diff --git a/.vscode/extensions.json b/.vscode/extensions.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c438347 --- /dev/null +++ b/.vscode/extensions.json @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +{ + "recommendations": [ + "mkaufman.HTMLHint" + ] +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/App/__pycache__/filters.cpython-310.pyc b/App/__pycache__/filters.cpython-310.pyc index 693dfdd..034c855 100644 Binary files a/App/__pycache__/filters.cpython-310.pyc and b/App/__pycache__/filters.cpython-310.pyc differ diff --git a/App/__pycache__/models.cpython-310.pyc b/App/__pycache__/models.cpython-310.pyc index eb3dafa..02a86b5 100644 Binary files a/App/__pycache__/models.cpython-310.pyc and b/App/__pycache__/models.cpython-310.pyc differ diff --git a/App/__pycache__/tfidfSimilarity.cpython-310.pyc b/App/__pycache__/tfidfSimilarity.cpython-310.pyc index 758aec0..4da1b5c 100644 Binary files a/App/__pycache__/tfidfSimilarity.cpython-310.pyc and b/App/__pycache__/tfidfSimilarity.cpython-310.pyc differ diff --git a/App/__pycache__/views.cpython-310.pyc b/App/__pycache__/views.cpython-310.pyc index 8f0b15c..c299f6a 100644 Binary files a/App/__pycache__/views.cpython-310.pyc and b/App/__pycache__/views.cpython-310.pyc differ diff --git a/App/filters.py b/App/filters.py index cdc1526..197fe5e 100644 --- a/App/filters.py +++ b/App/filters.py @@ -7,7 +7,6 @@ levels = Level.objects.all().values_list('levelNumber','levelName') standards = Standards.objects.all().values_list('standardTitle','standardTitle') class StandardsFilter(django_filters.FilterSet): - # level = django_filters.ModelChoiceFilter(queryset = SearchResults.objects.values('level')) level = django_filters.MultipleChoiceFilter(choices=levels) title = django_filters.MultipleChoiceFilter(choices=standards) class Meta: diff --git a/App/static/css/styles.css b/App/static/css/styles.css index d4b0d1a..825fd8c 100644 --- a/App/static/css/styles.css +++ b/App/static/css/styles.css @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ body, p, ul, ol { - font-size: 14px !important; + font-size: 16px !important; font-family: "Roboto", "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; color: #454545; letter-spacing: -0.35px; @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ ol { width: 30%; } -.title a { +.title{ font-family: "Roboto Condensed", "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 1; text-transform: none; @@ -441,4 +441,10 @@ ol { .dropdown-menu{ min-width: 25rem !important; +} + +/* ############featured Qs########################## */ +.fq{ + width: 45%; + background-color: rgb(238, 238, 238); } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/App/static/js/cloud.js b/App/static/js/cloud.js index 8a3da1e..44ef9c6 100644 --- a/App/static/js/cloud.js +++ b/App/static/js/cloud.js @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ anychart.onDocumentReady(function () { .enabled(true) .useHtml(true) .text( - 'Most Frequent Key-Phrases
' + + '

Most Frequent Key-Phrases


' + '' + 'Click on words to get results' + '' diff --git a/App/static/js/toggle.js b/App/static/js/toggle.js new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a14578e --- /dev/null +++ b/App/static/js/toggle.js @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +$(document).ready(function(){ + $('#filterBtn').click(function(){ + $child=$(this).children('i'); + $child.toggleClass("fa-arrow-down").toggleClass("fa-arrow-up"); + }); +}); \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/App/static/json/prcessedData.json b/App/static/json/prcessedData.json index 2d2fef2..8a2637f 100644 --- a/App/static/json/prcessedData.json +++ b/App/static/json/prcessedData.json @@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 13, - "Paragraph": "The three main aims of the IDDRS are:\\nto give DDR practitioners the opportunity to make informed decisions based on a clear, flexible and in-depth body of guidance across the range of DDR activities;\\nto serve as a common foundation for the commencement of integrated operational planning in Headquarters and at the country level; \\nto function as a resource for the training of DDR specialists.", + "Paragraph": "The three main aims of the IDDRS are:\nto give DDR practitioners the opportunity to make informed decisions based on a clear, flexible and in-depth body of guidance across the range of DDR activities;\nto serve as a common foundation for the commencement of integrated operational planning in Headquarters and at the country level; \nto function as a resource for the training of DDR specialists.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -552,14 +552,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The three main aims of the IDDRS are:\\nto give DDR practitioners the opportunity to make informed decisions based on a clear, flexible and in-depth body of guidance across the range of DDR activities;\\nto serve as a common foundation for the commencement of integrated operational planning in Headquarters and at the country level; \\nto function as a resource for the training of DDR specialists.", + "Sentence": "The three main aims of the IDDRS are:\nto give DDR practitioners the opportunity to make informed decisions based on a clear, flexible and in-depth body of guidance across the range of DDR activities;\nto serve as a common foundation for the commencement of integrated operational planning in Headquarters and at the country level; \nto function as a resource for the training of DDR specialists.", "newParagraph": "three main aim iddrs arento give ddr practitioner opportunity make informed decision based clear flexible indepth body guidance across range ddr activitiesnto serve common foundation commencement integrated operational planning headquarters country level nto function resource training ddr specialist", "ProcessedSent": "three main aim iddrs arento give ddr practitioner opportunity make informed decision based clear flexible indepth body guidance across range ddr activitiesnto serve common foundation commencement integrated operational planning headquarters country level nto function resource training ddr specialist", "SentID": 30 }, { "ParagraphID": 14, - "Paragraph": "The standards consist of 23 modules and three submodules divided into five levels:\\nLevel one consists of the introduction and a glossary to the full IDDRS; \\nLevel two sets out the strategic concepts of an integrated approach to DDR in a peacekeeping context; \\nLevel three elaborates on the structures and processes for planning and implementation of DDR at Headquarters and in the field; \\nLevel four provides considerations, options and tools for carrying out DDR operations;\\nLevel five covers the UN approach to essential cross-cutting issues, such as gender, youth and children associated with the armed forces and groups, cross-border movements, food assistance, HIV\/AIDS and health.", + "Paragraph": "The standards consist of 23 modules and three submodules divided into five levels:\nLevel one consists of the introduction and a glossary to the full IDDRS; \nLevel two sets out the strategic concepts of an integrated approach to DDR in a peacekeeping context; \nLevel three elaborates on the structures and processes for planning and implementation of DDR at Headquarters and in the field; \nLevel four provides considerations, options and tools for carrying out DDR operations;\nLevel five covers the UN approach to essential cross-cutting issues, such as gender, youth and children associated with the armed forces and groups, cross-border movements, food assistance, HIV\/AIDS and health.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ "Heading2": "3.1. IDDRS levels and modules", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The standards consist of 23 modules and three submodules divided into five levels:\\nLevel one consists of the introduction and a glossary to the full IDDRS; \\nLevel two sets out the strategic concepts of an integrated approach to DDR in a peacekeeping context; \\nLevel three elaborates on the structures and processes for planning and implementation of DDR at Headquarters and in the field; \\nLevel four provides considerations, options and tools for carrying out DDR operations;\\nLevel five covers the UN approach to essential cross-cutting issues, such as gender, youth and children associated with the armed forces and groups, cross-border movements, food assistance, HIV\/AIDS and health.", + "Sentence": "The standards consist of 23 modules and three submodules divided into five levels:\nLevel one consists of the introduction and a glossary to the full IDDRS; \nLevel two sets out the strategic concepts of an integrated approach to DDR in a peacekeeping context; \nLevel three elaborates on the structures and processes for planning and implementation of DDR at Headquarters and in the field; \nLevel four provides considerations, options and tools for carrying out DDR operations;\nLevel five covers the UN approach to essential cross-cutting issues, such as gender, youth and children associated with the armed forces and groups, cross-border movements, food assistance, HIV\/AIDS and health.", "newParagraph": "standard consist 23 module three submodules divided five levelsnlevel one consists introduction glossary full iddrs nlevel two set strategic concept integrated approach ddr peacekeeping context nlevel three elaborates structure process planning implementation ddr headquarters field nlevel four provides consideration option tool carrying ddr operationsnlevel five cover un approach essential crosscutting issue gender youth child associated armed force group crossborder movement food assistance hivaids health", "ProcessedSent": "standard consist 23 module three submodules divided five levelsnlevel one consists introduction glossary full iddrs nlevel two set strategic concept integrated approach ddr peacekeeping context nlevel three elaborates structure process planning implementation ddr headquarters field nlevel four provides consideration option tool carrying ddr operationsnlevel five cover un approach essential crosscutting issue gender youth child associated armed force group crossborder movement food assistance hivaids health", "SentID": 31 @@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 16, - "Paragraph": "Following a summary, a table of contents and a description of the scope and objectives, each IDDRS module also contains a section on terms, definitions and abbreviations. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines:\\n\u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard;\\nb) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; and\\nc) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "Following a summary, a table of contents and a description of the scope and objectives, each IDDRS module also contains a section on terms, definitions and abbreviations. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines:\n\u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard;\nb) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; and\nc) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -613,7 +613,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 16, - "Paragraph": "Following a summary, a table of contents and a description of the scope and objectives, each IDDRS module also contains a section on terms, definitions and abbreviations. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines:\\n\u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard;\\nb) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; and\\nc) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "Following a summary, a table of contents and a description of the scope and objectives, each IDDRS module also contains a section on terms, definitions and abbreviations. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines:\n\u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard;\nb) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; and\nc) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -631,7 +631,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 16, - "Paragraph": "Following a summary, a table of contents and a description of the scope and objectives, each IDDRS module also contains a section on terms, definitions and abbreviations. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines:\\n\u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard;\\nb) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; and\\nc) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "Following a summary, a table of contents and a description of the scope and objectives, each IDDRS module also contains a section on terms, definitions and abbreviations. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines:\n\u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard;\nb) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; and\nc) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -642,7 +642,7 @@ "Heading2": "3.2. Technical language", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines:\\n\u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard;\\nb) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; and\\nc) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines:\n\u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard;\nb) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; and\nc) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "newParagraph": "following summary table content description scope objective iddrs module also contains section term definition abbreviation iddrs series word shall may used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guidelinesn shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standardnb used indicate preferred requirement method specification andnc may used indicate possible method course action ", "ProcessedSent": "use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guidelinesn shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standardnb used indicate preferred requirement method specification andnc may used indicate possible method course action ", "SentID": 35 @@ -811,7 +811,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 21, - "Paragraph": "Each IDDRS module is current with effect from the date shown on the cover page. As the IDDRS are periodically reviewed, users should consult the UN DDR Resource Centre web site for updates: http:\/\/www.unddr.org.\\nFeedback and comments on the IDDRS are actively encouraged and should be sent to the Secretariat of the Inter-Agency Working Group via the DDR Resource Centre web site.", + "Paragraph": "Each IDDRS module is current with effect from the date shown on the cover page. As the IDDRS are periodically reviewed, users should consult the UN DDR Resource Centre web site for updates: http:\/\/www.unddr.org.\nFeedback and comments on the IDDRS are actively encouraged and should be sent to the Secretariat of the Inter-Agency Working Group via the DDR Resource Centre web site.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -829,7 +829,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 21, - "Paragraph": "Each IDDRS module is current with effect from the date shown on the cover page. As the IDDRS are periodically reviewed, users should consult the UN DDR Resource Centre web site for updates: http:\/\/www.unddr.org.\\nFeedback and comments on the IDDRS are actively encouraged and should be sent to the Secretariat of the Inter-Agency Working Group via the DDR Resource Centre web site.", + "Paragraph": "Each IDDRS module is current with effect from the date shown on the cover page. As the IDDRS are periodically reviewed, users should consult the UN DDR Resource Centre web site for updates: http:\/\/www.unddr.org.\nFeedback and comments on the IDDRS are actively encouraged and should be sent to the Secretariat of the Inter-Agency Working Group via the DDR Resource Centre web site.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -840,14 +840,14 @@ "Heading2": "3.5. Updates and feedback", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "As the IDDRS are periodically reviewed, users should consult the UN DDR Resource Centre web site for updates: http:\/\/www.unddr.org.\\nFeedback and comments on the IDDRS are actively encouraged and should be sent to the Secretariat of the Inter-Agency Working Group via the DDR Resource Centre web site.", + "Sentence": "As the IDDRS are periodically reviewed, users should consult the UN DDR Resource Centre web site for updates: http:\/\/www.unddr.org.\nFeedback and comments on the IDDRS are actively encouraged and should be sent to the Secretariat of the Inter-Agency Working Group via the DDR Resource Centre web site.", "newParagraph": "iddrs module current effect date shown cover page iddrs periodically reviewed user consult un ddr resource centre web site update httpwwwunddrorgnfeedback comment iddrs actively encouraged sent secretariat interagency working group via ddr resource centre web site", "ProcessedSent": "iddrs periodically reviewed user consult un ddr resource centre web site update httpwwwunddrorgnfeedback comment iddrs actively encouraged sent secretariat interagency working group via ddr resource centre web site", "SentID": 46 }, { "ParagraphID": 22, - "Paragraph": "1. Department of Disarmament Affairs, Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Department of Political Affairs, Department of Public Information, International Labour Organization, International Organization for Migration, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV\/AIDS, United Nations Children\u2019s Fund, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Development Fund for Women, United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, United Nations Population Fund, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, World Food Programme, World Health Organization.\\n2. Note of the Secretary-General to the General Assembly on the administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of the United Nations peacekeeping operations, A\/C.5\/59\/31, 24 May 2005.\\n3. A worldwide federation of national bodies from over 130 countries. Its work results in international agreements, which are published as ISO standards and guides. ISO is a non-governmental organization and the standards it develops are voluntary, although some (mainly those concerned with health, safety and environmental aspects) have been adopted by many countries as part of their regulatory framework. A list of ISO standards and guides is given in the ISO Catalogue, at http:\/\/www.iso.ch\/infoe\/catinfo\/html.\\nThe IDDRS have been developed to be compatible with ISO standards and guides. Adopting the ISO format and language provides some important advantages, including consistency of layout, use of internationally recognized terminology, and a greater acceptance by international, national and regional organizations who are accustomed to the ISO series of standards and guides.", + "Paragraph": "1. Department of Disarmament Affairs, Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Department of Political Affairs, Department of Public Information, International Labour Organization, International Organization for Migration, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV\/AIDS, United Nations Children\u2019s Fund, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Development Fund for Women, United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, United Nations Population Fund, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, World Food Programme, World Health Organization.\n2. Note of the Secretary-General to the General Assembly on the administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of the United Nations peacekeeping operations, A\/C.5\/59\/31, 24 May 2005.\n3. A worldwide federation of national bodies from over 130 countries. Its work results in international agreements, which are published as ISO standards and guides. ISO is a non-governmental organization and the standards it develops are voluntary, although some (mainly those concerned with health, safety and environmental aspects) have been adopted by many countries as part of their regulatory framework. A list of ISO standards and guides is given in the ISO Catalogue, at http:\/\/www.iso.ch\/infoe\/catinfo\/html.\nThe IDDRS have been developed to be compatible with ISO standards and guides. Adopting the ISO format and language provides some important advantages, including consistency of layout, use of internationally recognized terminology, and a greater acceptance by international, national and regional organizations who are accustomed to the ISO series of standards and guides.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -865,7 +865,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 22, - "Paragraph": "1. Department of Disarmament Affairs, Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Department of Political Affairs, Department of Public Information, International Labour Organization, International Organization for Migration, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV\/AIDS, United Nations Children\u2019s Fund, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Development Fund for Women, United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, United Nations Population Fund, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, World Food Programme, World Health Organization.\\n2. Note of the Secretary-General to the General Assembly on the administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of the United Nations peacekeeping operations, A\/C.5\/59\/31, 24 May 2005.\\n3. A worldwide federation of national bodies from over 130 countries. Its work results in international agreements, which are published as ISO standards and guides. ISO is a non-governmental organization and the standards it develops are voluntary, although some (mainly those concerned with health, safety and environmental aspects) have been adopted by many countries as part of their regulatory framework. A list of ISO standards and guides is given in the ISO Catalogue, at http:\/\/www.iso.ch\/infoe\/catinfo\/html.\\nThe IDDRS have been developed to be compatible with ISO standards and guides. Adopting the ISO format and language provides some important advantages, including consistency of layout, use of internationally recognized terminology, and a greater acceptance by international, national and regional organizations who are accustomed to the ISO series of standards and guides.", + "Paragraph": "1. Department of Disarmament Affairs, Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Department of Political Affairs, Department of Public Information, International Labour Organization, International Organization for Migration, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV\/AIDS, United Nations Children\u2019s Fund, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Development Fund for Women, United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, United Nations Population Fund, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, World Food Programme, World Health Organization.\n2. Note of the Secretary-General to the General Assembly on the administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of the United Nations peacekeeping operations, A\/C.5\/59\/31, 24 May 2005.\n3. A worldwide federation of national bodies from over 130 countries. Its work results in international agreements, which are published as ISO standards and guides. ISO is a non-governmental organization and the standards it develops are voluntary, although some (mainly those concerned with health, safety and environmental aspects) have been adopted by many countries as part of their regulatory framework. A list of ISO standards and guides is given in the ISO Catalogue, at http:\/\/www.iso.ch\/infoe\/catinfo\/html.\nThe IDDRS have been developed to be compatible with ISO standards and guides. Adopting the ISO format and language provides some important advantages, including consistency of layout, use of internationally recognized terminology, and a greater acceptance by international, national and regional organizations who are accustomed to the ISO series of standards and guides.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -876,14 +876,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Department of Disarmament Affairs, Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Department of Political Affairs, Department of Public Information, International Labour Organization, International Organization for Migration, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV\/AIDS, United Nations Children\u2019s Fund, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Development Fund for Women, United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, United Nations Population Fund, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, World Food Programme, World Health Organization.\\n2.", + "Sentence": "Department of Disarmament Affairs, Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Department of Political Affairs, Department of Public Information, International Labour Organization, International Organization for Migration, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV\/AIDS, United Nations Children\u2019s Fund, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Development Fund for Women, United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, United Nations Population Fund, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, World Food Programme, World Health Organization.\n2.", "newParagraph": "1 department disarmament affair department peacekeeping operation department political affair department public information international labour organization international organization migration joint united nation programme hivaids united nation child fund united nation development programme united nation development fund woman united nation institute disarmament research united nation population fund united nation high commissioner refugee world food programme world health organizationn2 note secretarygeneral general assembly administrative budgetary aspect financing united nation peacekeeping operation ac55931 24 may 2005n3 worldwide federation national body 130 country work result international agreement published iso standard guide iso nongovernmental organization standard develops voluntary although mainly concerned health safety environmental aspect adopted many country part regulatory framework list iso standard guide given iso catalogue httpwwwisochinfoecatinfohtmlnthe iddrs developed compatible iso standard guide adopting iso format language provides important advantage including consistency layout use internationally recognized terminology greater acceptance international national regional organization accustomed iso series standard guide", "ProcessedSent": "department disarmament affair department peacekeeping operation department political affair department public information international labour organization international organization migration joint united nation programme hivaids united nation child fund united nation development programme united nation development fund woman united nation institute disarmament research united nation population fund united nation high commissioner refugee world food programme world health organizationn2", "SentID": 48 }, { "ParagraphID": 22, - "Paragraph": "1. Department of Disarmament Affairs, Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Department of Political Affairs, Department of Public Information, International Labour Organization, International Organization for Migration, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV\/AIDS, United Nations Children\u2019s Fund, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Development Fund for Women, United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, United Nations Population Fund, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, World Food Programme, World Health Organization.\\n2. Note of the Secretary-General to the General Assembly on the administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of the United Nations peacekeeping operations, A\/C.5\/59\/31, 24 May 2005.\\n3. A worldwide federation of national bodies from over 130 countries. Its work results in international agreements, which are published as ISO standards and guides. ISO is a non-governmental organization and the standards it develops are voluntary, although some (mainly those concerned with health, safety and environmental aspects) have been adopted by many countries as part of their regulatory framework. A list of ISO standards and guides is given in the ISO Catalogue, at http:\/\/www.iso.ch\/infoe\/catinfo\/html.\\nThe IDDRS have been developed to be compatible with ISO standards and guides. Adopting the ISO format and language provides some important advantages, including consistency of layout, use of internationally recognized terminology, and a greater acceptance by international, national and regional organizations who are accustomed to the ISO series of standards and guides.", + "Paragraph": "1. Department of Disarmament Affairs, Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Department of Political Affairs, Department of Public Information, International Labour Organization, International Organization for Migration, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV\/AIDS, United Nations Children\u2019s Fund, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Development Fund for Women, United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, United Nations Population Fund, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, World Food Programme, World Health Organization.\n2. Note of the Secretary-General to the General Assembly on the administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of the United Nations peacekeeping operations, A\/C.5\/59\/31, 24 May 2005.\n3. A worldwide federation of national bodies from over 130 countries. Its work results in international agreements, which are published as ISO standards and guides. ISO is a non-governmental organization and the standards it develops are voluntary, although some (mainly those concerned with health, safety and environmental aspects) have been adopted by many countries as part of their regulatory framework. A list of ISO standards and guides is given in the ISO Catalogue, at http:\/\/www.iso.ch\/infoe\/catinfo\/html.\nThe IDDRS have been developed to be compatible with ISO standards and guides. Adopting the ISO format and language provides some important advantages, including consistency of layout, use of internationally recognized terminology, and a greater acceptance by international, national and regional organizations who are accustomed to the ISO series of standards and guides.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -894,14 +894,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Note of the Secretary-General to the General Assembly on the administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of the United Nations peacekeeping operations, A\/C.5\/59\/31, 24 May 2005.\\n3.", + "Sentence": "Note of the Secretary-General to the General Assembly on the administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of the United Nations peacekeeping operations, A\/C.5\/59\/31, 24 May 2005.\n3.", "newParagraph": "1 department disarmament affair department peacekeeping operation department political affair department public information international labour organization international organization migration joint united nation programme hivaids united nation child fund united nation development programme united nation development fund woman united nation institute disarmament research united nation population fund united nation high commissioner refugee world food programme world health organizationn2 note secretarygeneral general assembly administrative budgetary aspect financing united nation peacekeeping operation ac55931 24 may 2005n3 worldwide federation national body 130 country work result international agreement published iso standard guide iso nongovernmental organization standard develops voluntary although mainly concerned health safety environmental aspect adopted many country part regulatory framework list iso standard guide given iso catalogue httpwwwisochinfoecatinfohtmlnthe iddrs developed compatible iso standard guide adopting iso format language provides important advantage including consistency layout use internationally recognized terminology greater acceptance international national regional organization accustomed iso series standard guide", "ProcessedSent": "note secretarygeneral general assembly administrative budgetary aspect financing united nation peacekeeping operation ac55931 24 may 2005n3", "SentID": 49 }, { "ParagraphID": 22, - "Paragraph": "1. Department of Disarmament Affairs, Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Department of Political Affairs, Department of Public Information, International Labour Organization, International Organization for Migration, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV\/AIDS, United Nations Children\u2019s Fund, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Development Fund for Women, United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, United Nations Population Fund, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, World Food Programme, World Health Organization.\\n2. Note of the Secretary-General to the General Assembly on the administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of the United Nations peacekeeping operations, A\/C.5\/59\/31, 24 May 2005.\\n3. A worldwide federation of national bodies from over 130 countries. Its work results in international agreements, which are published as ISO standards and guides. ISO is a non-governmental organization and the standards it develops are voluntary, although some (mainly those concerned with health, safety and environmental aspects) have been adopted by many countries as part of their regulatory framework. A list of ISO standards and guides is given in the ISO Catalogue, at http:\/\/www.iso.ch\/infoe\/catinfo\/html.\\nThe IDDRS have been developed to be compatible with ISO standards and guides. Adopting the ISO format and language provides some important advantages, including consistency of layout, use of internationally recognized terminology, and a greater acceptance by international, national and regional organizations who are accustomed to the ISO series of standards and guides.", + "Paragraph": "1. Department of Disarmament Affairs, Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Department of Political Affairs, Department of Public Information, International Labour Organization, International Organization for Migration, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV\/AIDS, United Nations Children\u2019s Fund, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Development Fund for Women, United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, United Nations Population Fund, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, World Food Programme, World Health Organization.\n2. Note of the Secretary-General to the General Assembly on the administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of the United Nations peacekeeping operations, A\/C.5\/59\/31, 24 May 2005.\n3. A worldwide federation of national bodies from over 130 countries. Its work results in international agreements, which are published as ISO standards and guides. ISO is a non-governmental organization and the standards it develops are voluntary, although some (mainly those concerned with health, safety and environmental aspects) have been adopted by many countries as part of their regulatory framework. A list of ISO standards and guides is given in the ISO Catalogue, at http:\/\/www.iso.ch\/infoe\/catinfo\/html.\nThe IDDRS have been developed to be compatible with ISO standards and guides. Adopting the ISO format and language provides some important advantages, including consistency of layout, use of internationally recognized terminology, and a greater acceptance by international, national and regional organizations who are accustomed to the ISO series of standards and guides.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -919,7 +919,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 22, - "Paragraph": "1. Department of Disarmament Affairs, Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Department of Political Affairs, Department of Public Information, International Labour Organization, International Organization for Migration, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV\/AIDS, United Nations Children\u2019s Fund, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Development Fund for Women, United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, United Nations Population Fund, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, World Food Programme, World Health Organization.\\n2. Note of the Secretary-General to the General Assembly on the administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of the United Nations peacekeeping operations, A\/C.5\/59\/31, 24 May 2005.\\n3. A worldwide federation of national bodies from over 130 countries. Its work results in international agreements, which are published as ISO standards and guides. ISO is a non-governmental organization and the standards it develops are voluntary, although some (mainly those concerned with health, safety and environmental aspects) have been adopted by many countries as part of their regulatory framework. A list of ISO standards and guides is given in the ISO Catalogue, at http:\/\/www.iso.ch\/infoe\/catinfo\/html.\\nThe IDDRS have been developed to be compatible with ISO standards and guides. Adopting the ISO format and language provides some important advantages, including consistency of layout, use of internationally recognized terminology, and a greater acceptance by international, national and regional organizations who are accustomed to the ISO series of standards and guides.", + "Paragraph": "1. Department of Disarmament Affairs, Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Department of Political Affairs, Department of Public Information, International Labour Organization, International Organization for Migration, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV\/AIDS, United Nations Children\u2019s Fund, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Development Fund for Women, United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, United Nations Population Fund, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, World Food Programme, World Health Organization.\n2. Note of the Secretary-General to the General Assembly on the administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of the United Nations peacekeeping operations, A\/C.5\/59\/31, 24 May 2005.\n3. A worldwide federation of national bodies from over 130 countries. Its work results in international agreements, which are published as ISO standards and guides. ISO is a non-governmental organization and the standards it develops are voluntary, although some (mainly those concerned with health, safety and environmental aspects) have been adopted by many countries as part of their regulatory framework. A list of ISO standards and guides is given in the ISO Catalogue, at http:\/\/www.iso.ch\/infoe\/catinfo\/html.\nThe IDDRS have been developed to be compatible with ISO standards and guides. Adopting the ISO format and language provides some important advantages, including consistency of layout, use of internationally recognized terminology, and a greater acceptance by international, national and regional organizations who are accustomed to the ISO series of standards and guides.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -937,7 +937,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 22, - "Paragraph": "1. Department of Disarmament Affairs, Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Department of Political Affairs, Department of Public Information, International Labour Organization, International Organization for Migration, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV\/AIDS, United Nations Children\u2019s Fund, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Development Fund for Women, United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, United Nations Population Fund, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, World Food Programme, World Health Organization.\\n2. Note of the Secretary-General to the General Assembly on the administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of the United Nations peacekeeping operations, A\/C.5\/59\/31, 24 May 2005.\\n3. A worldwide federation of national bodies from over 130 countries. Its work results in international agreements, which are published as ISO standards and guides. ISO is a non-governmental organization and the standards it develops are voluntary, although some (mainly those concerned with health, safety and environmental aspects) have been adopted by many countries as part of their regulatory framework. A list of ISO standards and guides is given in the ISO Catalogue, at http:\/\/www.iso.ch\/infoe\/catinfo\/html.\\nThe IDDRS have been developed to be compatible with ISO standards and guides. Adopting the ISO format and language provides some important advantages, including consistency of layout, use of internationally recognized terminology, and a greater acceptance by international, national and regional organizations who are accustomed to the ISO series of standards and guides.", + "Paragraph": "1. Department of Disarmament Affairs, Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Department of Political Affairs, Department of Public Information, International Labour Organization, International Organization for Migration, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV\/AIDS, United Nations Children\u2019s Fund, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Development Fund for Women, United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, United Nations Population Fund, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, World Food Programme, World Health Organization.\n2. Note of the Secretary-General to the General Assembly on the administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of the United Nations peacekeeping operations, A\/C.5\/59\/31, 24 May 2005.\n3. A worldwide federation of national bodies from over 130 countries. Its work results in international agreements, which are published as ISO standards and guides. ISO is a non-governmental organization and the standards it develops are voluntary, although some (mainly those concerned with health, safety and environmental aspects) have been adopted by many countries as part of their regulatory framework. A list of ISO standards and guides is given in the ISO Catalogue, at http:\/\/www.iso.ch\/infoe\/catinfo\/html.\nThe IDDRS have been developed to be compatible with ISO standards and guides. Adopting the ISO format and language provides some important advantages, including consistency of layout, use of internationally recognized terminology, and a greater acceptance by international, national and regional organizations who are accustomed to the ISO series of standards and guides.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -955,7 +955,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 22, - "Paragraph": "1. Department of Disarmament Affairs, Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Department of Political Affairs, Department of Public Information, International Labour Organization, International Organization for Migration, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV\/AIDS, United Nations Children\u2019s Fund, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Development Fund for Women, United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, United Nations Population Fund, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, World Food Programme, World Health Organization.\\n2. Note of the Secretary-General to the General Assembly on the administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of the United Nations peacekeeping operations, A\/C.5\/59\/31, 24 May 2005.\\n3. A worldwide federation of national bodies from over 130 countries. Its work results in international agreements, which are published as ISO standards and guides. ISO is a non-governmental organization and the standards it develops are voluntary, although some (mainly those concerned with health, safety and environmental aspects) have been adopted by many countries as part of their regulatory framework. A list of ISO standards and guides is given in the ISO Catalogue, at http:\/\/www.iso.ch\/infoe\/catinfo\/html.\\nThe IDDRS have been developed to be compatible with ISO standards and guides. Adopting the ISO format and language provides some important advantages, including consistency of layout, use of internationally recognized terminology, and a greater acceptance by international, national and regional organizations who are accustomed to the ISO series of standards and guides.", + "Paragraph": "1. Department of Disarmament Affairs, Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Department of Political Affairs, Department of Public Information, International Labour Organization, International Organization for Migration, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV\/AIDS, United Nations Children\u2019s Fund, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Development Fund for Women, United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, United Nations Population Fund, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, World Food Programme, World Health Organization.\n2. Note of the Secretary-General to the General Assembly on the administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of the United Nations peacekeeping operations, A\/C.5\/59\/31, 24 May 2005.\n3. A worldwide federation of national bodies from over 130 countries. Its work results in international agreements, which are published as ISO standards and guides. ISO is a non-governmental organization and the standards it develops are voluntary, although some (mainly those concerned with health, safety and environmental aspects) have been adopted by many countries as part of their regulatory framework. A list of ISO standards and guides is given in the ISO Catalogue, at http:\/\/www.iso.ch\/infoe\/catinfo\/html.\nThe IDDRS have been developed to be compatible with ISO standards and guides. Adopting the ISO format and language provides some important advantages, including consistency of layout, use of internationally recognized terminology, and a greater acceptance by international, national and regional organizations who are accustomed to the ISO series of standards and guides.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -966,14 +966,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "A list of ISO standards and guides is given in the ISO Catalogue, at http:\/\/www.iso.ch\/infoe\/catinfo\/html.\\nThe IDDRS have been developed to be compatible with ISO standards and guides.", + "Sentence": "A list of ISO standards and guides is given in the ISO Catalogue, at http:\/\/www.iso.ch\/infoe\/catinfo\/html.\nThe IDDRS have been developed to be compatible with ISO standards and guides.", "newParagraph": "1 department disarmament affair department peacekeeping operation department political affair department public information international labour organization international organization migration joint united nation programme hivaids united nation child fund united nation development programme united nation development fund woman united nation institute disarmament research united nation population fund united nation high commissioner refugee world food programme world health organizationn2 note secretarygeneral general assembly administrative budgetary aspect financing united nation peacekeeping operation ac55931 24 may 2005n3 worldwide federation national body 130 country work result international agreement published iso standard guide iso nongovernmental organization standard develops voluntary although mainly concerned health safety environmental aspect adopted many country part regulatory framework list iso standard guide given iso catalogue httpwwwisochinfoecatinfohtmlnthe iddrs developed compatible iso standard guide adopting iso format language provides important advantage including consistency layout use internationally recognized terminology greater acceptance international national regional organization accustomed iso series standard guide", "ProcessedSent": "list iso standard guide given iso catalogue httpwwwisochinfoecatinfohtmlnthe iddrs developed compatible iso standard guide", "SentID": 53 }, { "ParagraphID": 22, - "Paragraph": "1. Department of Disarmament Affairs, Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Department of Political Affairs, Department of Public Information, International Labour Organization, International Organization for Migration, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV\/AIDS, United Nations Children\u2019s Fund, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Development Fund for Women, United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, United Nations Population Fund, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, World Food Programme, World Health Organization.\\n2. Note of the Secretary-General to the General Assembly on the administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of the United Nations peacekeeping operations, A\/C.5\/59\/31, 24 May 2005.\\n3. A worldwide federation of national bodies from over 130 countries. Its work results in international agreements, which are published as ISO standards and guides. ISO is a non-governmental organization and the standards it develops are voluntary, although some (mainly those concerned with health, safety and environmental aspects) have been adopted by many countries as part of their regulatory framework. A list of ISO standards and guides is given in the ISO Catalogue, at http:\/\/www.iso.ch\/infoe\/catinfo\/html.\\nThe IDDRS have been developed to be compatible with ISO standards and guides. Adopting the ISO format and language provides some important advantages, including consistency of layout, use of internationally recognized terminology, and a greater acceptance by international, national and regional organizations who are accustomed to the ISO series of standards and guides.", + "Paragraph": "1. Department of Disarmament Affairs, Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Department of Political Affairs, Department of Public Information, International Labour Organization, International Organization for Migration, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV\/AIDS, United Nations Children\u2019s Fund, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Development Fund for Women, United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, United Nations Population Fund, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, World Food Programme, World Health Organization.\n2. Note of the Secretary-General to the General Assembly on the administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of the United Nations peacekeeping operations, A\/C.5\/59\/31, 24 May 2005.\n3. A worldwide federation of national bodies from over 130 countries. Its work results in international agreements, which are published as ISO standards and guides. ISO is a non-governmental organization and the standards it develops are voluntary, although some (mainly those concerned with health, safety and environmental aspects) have been adopted by many countries as part of their regulatory framework. A list of ISO standards and guides is given in the ISO Catalogue, at http:\/\/www.iso.ch\/infoe\/catinfo\/html.\nThe IDDRS have been developed to be compatible with ISO standards and guides. Adopting the ISO format and language provides some important advantages, including consistency of layout, use of internationally recognized terminology, and a greater acceptance by international, national and regional organizations who are accustomed to the ISO series of standards and guides.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -1369,7 +1369,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 38, - "Paragraph": "Activities that serve to facilitate the transfer of arms between persons in different third countries, insofar as such transfer is furthered through the assistance of a so-called broker. Core brokering activities include:\\nacquisition of SALW located in one third country for the purpose of transfer to another third country;\\nmediation between sellers and buyers of SALW to facilitate the trans\u00adfer of these arms from one third country to another; \\nthe indication of an opportunity for such a transaction to the seller or buyer (in particular, the introduction of a seller or buyer in return for a fee or other consideration).", + "Paragraph": "Activities that serve to facilitate the transfer of arms between persons in different third countries, insofar as such transfer is furthered through the assistance of a so-called broker. Core brokering activities include:\nacquisition of SALW located in one third country for the purpose of transfer to another third country;\nmediation between sellers and buyers of SALW to facilitate the trans\u00adfer of these arms from one third country to another; \nthe indication of an opportunity for such a transaction to the seller or buyer (in particular, the introduction of a seller or buyer in return for a fee or other consideration).", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -1387,7 +1387,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 38, - "Paragraph": "Activities that serve to facilitate the transfer of arms between persons in different third countries, insofar as such transfer is furthered through the assistance of a so-called broker. Core brokering activities include:\\nacquisition of SALW located in one third country for the purpose of transfer to another third country;\\nmediation between sellers and buyers of SALW to facilitate the trans\u00adfer of these arms from one third country to another; \\nthe indication of an opportunity for such a transaction to the seller or buyer (in particular, the introduction of a seller or buyer in return for a fee or other consideration).", + "Paragraph": "Activities that serve to facilitate the transfer of arms between persons in different third countries, insofar as such transfer is furthered through the assistance of a so-called broker. Core brokering activities include:\nacquisition of SALW located in one third country for the purpose of transfer to another third country;\nmediation between sellers and buyers of SALW to facilitate the trans\u00adfer of these arms from one third country to another; \nthe indication of an opportunity for such a transaction to the seller or buyer (in particular, the introduction of a seller or buyer in return for a fee or other consideration).", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -1398,7 +1398,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Core brokering activities include:\\nacquisition of SALW located in one third country for the purpose of transfer to another third country;\\nmediation between sellers and buyers of SALW to facilitate the trans\u00adfer of these arms from one third country to another; \\nthe indication of an opportunity for such a transaction to the seller or buyer (in particular, the introduction of a seller or buyer in return for a fee or other consideration).", + "Sentence": "Core brokering activities include:\nacquisition of SALW located in one third country for the purpose of transfer to another third country;\nmediation between sellers and buyers of SALW to facilitate the trans\u00adfer of these arms from one third country to another; \nthe indication of an opportunity for such a transaction to the seller or buyer (in particular, the introduction of a seller or buyer in return for a fee or other consideration).", "newParagraph": "activity serve facilitate transfer arm person different third country insofar transfer furthered assistance socalled broker core brokering activity includenacquisition salw located one third country purpose transfer another third countrynmediation seller buyer salw facilitate trans fer arm one third country another nthe indication opportunity transaction seller buyer particular introduction seller buyer return fee consideration", "ProcessedSent": "core brokering activity includenacquisition salw located one third country purpose transfer another third countrynmediation seller buyer salw facilitate trans fer arm one third country another nthe indication opportunity transaction seller buyer particular introduction seller buyer return fee consideration", "SentID": 77 @@ -1567,7 +1567,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 45, - "Paragraph": "The definition commonly applied to children associated with armed forces andGroups in prevention, demobilization and reintegration programmes derives from the Cape Town Principles and Best Practices (1997), in which the term \u2018child soldier\u2019 refers to: \u201cAny person under 18 years of age who is part of any kind of regular or irregular armed force or armed group in any capacity, including, but not limited to: cooks, porters, messengers and anyone accompanying such groups, other than family members. The definition includes girls recruited for sexual purposes and for forced marriage. It does not, therefore, only refer to a child who is carrying or has carried arms.\u201d\\nIn his February 2000 report to the UN Security Council, the SecretaryGeneral defined a child soldier \u201cas any person under the age 18 years of age who forms part of an armed force in any capacity and those accompanying such groups, other than purely as family members, as well as girls recruited for sexual purposes and forced marriage\u201d. The CRC specifies that a child is every human below the age of 18.\\nThe term \u2018children associated with armed forces and groups\u2019, although more cumbersome, is now used to avoid the perception that the only children of concern are combatant boys. It points out that children eligible for release and reintegration programmes are both those associated with armed forces and groups and those who fled armed forces and groups (often considered as deserters and therefore requiring support and protection), children who were abducted, those forcibly married and those in detention.\\nAccess to demobilization does not depend on a child\u2019s level of involvement in armed forces and groups. No distinction is made between combatants and non-combatants for fear of unfair treatment, oversight or exclusion (mainly of girls). Nevertheless, the child\u2019s personal history and activities in the armed conflict can help decide on the kind of support he\/she needs in the reintegration phase.", + "Paragraph": "The definition commonly applied to children associated with armed forces andGroups in prevention, demobilization and reintegration programmes derives from the Cape Town Principles and Best Practices (1997), in which the term \u2018child soldier\u2019 refers to: \u201cAny person under 18 years of age who is part of any kind of regular or irregular armed force or armed group in any capacity, including, but not limited to: cooks, porters, messengers and anyone accompanying such groups, other than family members. The definition includes girls recruited for sexual purposes and for forced marriage. It does not, therefore, only refer to a child who is carrying or has carried arms.\u201d\nIn his February 2000 report to the UN Security Council, the SecretaryGeneral defined a child soldier \u201cas any person under the age 18 years of age who forms part of an armed force in any capacity and those accompanying such groups, other than purely as family members, as well as girls recruited for sexual purposes and forced marriage\u201d. The CRC specifies that a child is every human below the age of 18.\nThe term \u2018children associated with armed forces and groups\u2019, although more cumbersome, is now used to avoid the perception that the only children of concern are combatant boys. It points out that children eligible for release and reintegration programmes are both those associated with armed forces and groups and those who fled armed forces and groups (often considered as deserters and therefore requiring support and protection), children who were abducted, those forcibly married and those in detention.\nAccess to demobilization does not depend on a child\u2019s level of involvement in armed forces and groups. No distinction is made between combatants and non-combatants for fear of unfair treatment, oversight or exclusion (mainly of girls). Nevertheless, the child\u2019s personal history and activities in the armed conflict can help decide on the kind of support he\/she needs in the reintegration phase.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -1585,7 +1585,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 45, - "Paragraph": "The definition commonly applied to children associated with armed forces andGroups in prevention, demobilization and reintegration programmes derives from the Cape Town Principles and Best Practices (1997), in which the term \u2018child soldier\u2019 refers to: \u201cAny person under 18 years of age who is part of any kind of regular or irregular armed force or armed group in any capacity, including, but not limited to: cooks, porters, messengers and anyone accompanying such groups, other than family members. The definition includes girls recruited for sexual purposes and for forced marriage. It does not, therefore, only refer to a child who is carrying or has carried arms.\u201d\\nIn his February 2000 report to the UN Security Council, the SecretaryGeneral defined a child soldier \u201cas any person under the age 18 years of age who forms part of an armed force in any capacity and those accompanying such groups, other than purely as family members, as well as girls recruited for sexual purposes and forced marriage\u201d. The CRC specifies that a child is every human below the age of 18.\\nThe term \u2018children associated with armed forces and groups\u2019, although more cumbersome, is now used to avoid the perception that the only children of concern are combatant boys. It points out that children eligible for release and reintegration programmes are both those associated with armed forces and groups and those who fled armed forces and groups (often considered as deserters and therefore requiring support and protection), children who were abducted, those forcibly married and those in detention.\\nAccess to demobilization does not depend on a child\u2019s level of involvement in armed forces and groups. No distinction is made between combatants and non-combatants for fear of unfair treatment, oversight or exclusion (mainly of girls). Nevertheless, the child\u2019s personal history and activities in the armed conflict can help decide on the kind of support he\/she needs in the reintegration phase.", + "Paragraph": "The definition commonly applied to children associated with armed forces andGroups in prevention, demobilization and reintegration programmes derives from the Cape Town Principles and Best Practices (1997), in which the term \u2018child soldier\u2019 refers to: \u201cAny person under 18 years of age who is part of any kind of regular or irregular armed force or armed group in any capacity, including, but not limited to: cooks, porters, messengers and anyone accompanying such groups, other than family members. The definition includes girls recruited for sexual purposes and for forced marriage. It does not, therefore, only refer to a child who is carrying or has carried arms.\u201d\nIn his February 2000 report to the UN Security Council, the SecretaryGeneral defined a child soldier \u201cas any person under the age 18 years of age who forms part of an armed force in any capacity and those accompanying such groups, other than purely as family members, as well as girls recruited for sexual purposes and forced marriage\u201d. The CRC specifies that a child is every human below the age of 18.\nThe term \u2018children associated with armed forces and groups\u2019, although more cumbersome, is now used to avoid the perception that the only children of concern are combatant boys. It points out that children eligible for release and reintegration programmes are both those associated with armed forces and groups and those who fled armed forces and groups (often considered as deserters and therefore requiring support and protection), children who were abducted, those forcibly married and those in detention.\nAccess to demobilization does not depend on a child\u2019s level of involvement in armed forces and groups. No distinction is made between combatants and non-combatants for fear of unfair treatment, oversight or exclusion (mainly of girls). Nevertheless, the child\u2019s personal history and activities in the armed conflict can help decide on the kind of support he\/she needs in the reintegration phase.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -1603,7 +1603,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 45, - "Paragraph": "The definition commonly applied to children associated with armed forces andGroups in prevention, demobilization and reintegration programmes derives from the Cape Town Principles and Best Practices (1997), in which the term \u2018child soldier\u2019 refers to: \u201cAny person under 18 years of age who is part of any kind of regular or irregular armed force or armed group in any capacity, including, but not limited to: cooks, porters, messengers and anyone accompanying such groups, other than family members. The definition includes girls recruited for sexual purposes and for forced marriage. It does not, therefore, only refer to a child who is carrying or has carried arms.\u201d\\nIn his February 2000 report to the UN Security Council, the SecretaryGeneral defined a child soldier \u201cas any person under the age 18 years of age who forms part of an armed force in any capacity and those accompanying such groups, other than purely as family members, as well as girls recruited for sexual purposes and forced marriage\u201d. The CRC specifies that a child is every human below the age of 18.\\nThe term \u2018children associated with armed forces and groups\u2019, although more cumbersome, is now used to avoid the perception that the only children of concern are combatant boys. It points out that children eligible for release and reintegration programmes are both those associated with armed forces and groups and those who fled armed forces and groups (often considered as deserters and therefore requiring support and protection), children who were abducted, those forcibly married and those in detention.\\nAccess to demobilization does not depend on a child\u2019s level of involvement in armed forces and groups. No distinction is made between combatants and non-combatants for fear of unfair treatment, oversight or exclusion (mainly of girls). Nevertheless, the child\u2019s personal history and activities in the armed conflict can help decide on the kind of support he\/she needs in the reintegration phase.", + "Paragraph": "The definition commonly applied to children associated with armed forces andGroups in prevention, demobilization and reintegration programmes derives from the Cape Town Principles and Best Practices (1997), in which the term \u2018child soldier\u2019 refers to: \u201cAny person under 18 years of age who is part of any kind of regular or irregular armed force or armed group in any capacity, including, but not limited to: cooks, porters, messengers and anyone accompanying such groups, other than family members. The definition includes girls recruited for sexual purposes and for forced marriage. It does not, therefore, only refer to a child who is carrying or has carried arms.\u201d\nIn his February 2000 report to the UN Security Council, the SecretaryGeneral defined a child soldier \u201cas any person under the age 18 years of age who forms part of an armed force in any capacity and those accompanying such groups, other than purely as family members, as well as girls recruited for sexual purposes and forced marriage\u201d. The CRC specifies that a child is every human below the age of 18.\nThe term \u2018children associated with armed forces and groups\u2019, although more cumbersome, is now used to avoid the perception that the only children of concern are combatant boys. It points out that children eligible for release and reintegration programmes are both those associated with armed forces and groups and those who fled armed forces and groups (often considered as deserters and therefore requiring support and protection), children who were abducted, those forcibly married and those in detention.\nAccess to demobilization does not depend on a child\u2019s level of involvement in armed forces and groups. No distinction is made between combatants and non-combatants for fear of unfair treatment, oversight or exclusion (mainly of girls). Nevertheless, the child\u2019s personal history and activities in the armed conflict can help decide on the kind of support he\/she needs in the reintegration phase.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -1614,14 +1614,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "It does not, therefore, only refer to a child who is carrying or has carried arms.\u201d\\nIn his February 2000 report to the UN Security Council, the SecretaryGeneral defined a child soldier \u201cas any person under the age 18 years of age who forms part of an armed force in any capacity and those accompanying such groups, other than purely as family members, as well as girls recruited for sexual purposes and forced marriage\u201d.", + "Sentence": "It does not, therefore, only refer to a child who is carrying or has carried arms.\u201d\nIn his February 2000 report to the UN Security Council, the SecretaryGeneral defined a child soldier \u201cas any person under the age 18 years of age who forms part of an armed force in any capacity and those accompanying such groups, other than purely as family members, as well as girls recruited for sexual purposes and forced marriage\u201d.", "newParagraph": "definition commonly applied child associated armed force andgroups prevention demobilization reintegration programme derives cape town principle best practice 1997 term child soldier refers person 18 year age part kind regular irregular armed force armed group capacity including limited cook porter messenger anyone accompanying group family member definition includes girl recruited sexual purpose forced marriage therefore refer child carrying carried arm nin february 2000 report un security council secretarygeneral defined child soldier person age 18 year age form part armed force capacity accompanying group purely family member well girl recruited sexual purpose forced marriage crc specifies child every human age 18nthe term child associated armed force group although cumbersome used avoid perception child concern combatant boy point child eligible release reintegration programme associated armed force group fled armed force group often considered deserter therefore requiring support protection child abducted forcibly married detentionnaccess demobilization depend child level involvement armed force group distinction made combatant noncombatant fear unfair treatment oversight exclusion mainly girl nevertheless child personal history activity armed conflict help decide kind support heshe need reintegration phase", "ProcessedSent": "therefore refer child carrying carried arm nin february 2000 report un security council secretarygeneral defined child soldier person age 18 year age form part armed force capacity accompanying group purely family member well girl recruited sexual purpose forced marriage ", "SentID": 89 }, { "ParagraphID": 45, - "Paragraph": "The definition commonly applied to children associated with armed forces andGroups in prevention, demobilization and reintegration programmes derives from the Cape Town Principles and Best Practices (1997), in which the term \u2018child soldier\u2019 refers to: \u201cAny person under 18 years of age who is part of any kind of regular or irregular armed force or armed group in any capacity, including, but not limited to: cooks, porters, messengers and anyone accompanying such groups, other than family members. The definition includes girls recruited for sexual purposes and for forced marriage. It does not, therefore, only refer to a child who is carrying or has carried arms.\u201d\\nIn his February 2000 report to the UN Security Council, the SecretaryGeneral defined a child soldier \u201cas any person under the age 18 years of age who forms part of an armed force in any capacity and those accompanying such groups, other than purely as family members, as well as girls recruited for sexual purposes and forced marriage\u201d. The CRC specifies that a child is every human below the age of 18.\\nThe term \u2018children associated with armed forces and groups\u2019, although more cumbersome, is now used to avoid the perception that the only children of concern are combatant boys. It points out that children eligible for release and reintegration programmes are both those associated with armed forces and groups and those who fled armed forces and groups (often considered as deserters and therefore requiring support and protection), children who were abducted, those forcibly married and those in detention.\\nAccess to demobilization does not depend on a child\u2019s level of involvement in armed forces and groups. No distinction is made between combatants and non-combatants for fear of unfair treatment, oversight or exclusion (mainly of girls). Nevertheless, the child\u2019s personal history and activities in the armed conflict can help decide on the kind of support he\/she needs in the reintegration phase.", + "Paragraph": "The definition commonly applied to children associated with armed forces andGroups in prevention, demobilization and reintegration programmes derives from the Cape Town Principles and Best Practices (1997), in which the term \u2018child soldier\u2019 refers to: \u201cAny person under 18 years of age who is part of any kind of regular or irregular armed force or armed group in any capacity, including, but not limited to: cooks, porters, messengers and anyone accompanying such groups, other than family members. The definition includes girls recruited for sexual purposes and for forced marriage. It does not, therefore, only refer to a child who is carrying or has carried arms.\u201d\nIn his February 2000 report to the UN Security Council, the SecretaryGeneral defined a child soldier \u201cas any person under the age 18 years of age who forms part of an armed force in any capacity and those accompanying such groups, other than purely as family members, as well as girls recruited for sexual purposes and forced marriage\u201d. The CRC specifies that a child is every human below the age of 18.\nThe term \u2018children associated with armed forces and groups\u2019, although more cumbersome, is now used to avoid the perception that the only children of concern are combatant boys. It points out that children eligible for release and reintegration programmes are both those associated with armed forces and groups and those who fled armed forces and groups (often considered as deserters and therefore requiring support and protection), children who were abducted, those forcibly married and those in detention.\nAccess to demobilization does not depend on a child\u2019s level of involvement in armed forces and groups. No distinction is made between combatants and non-combatants for fear of unfair treatment, oversight or exclusion (mainly of girls). Nevertheless, the child\u2019s personal history and activities in the armed conflict can help decide on the kind of support he\/she needs in the reintegration phase.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -1632,14 +1632,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The CRC specifies that a child is every human below the age of 18.\\nThe term \u2018children associated with armed forces and groups\u2019, although more cumbersome, is now used to avoid the perception that the only children of concern are combatant boys.", + "Sentence": "The CRC specifies that a child is every human below the age of 18.\nThe term \u2018children associated with armed forces and groups\u2019, although more cumbersome, is now used to avoid the perception that the only children of concern are combatant boys.", "newParagraph": "definition commonly applied child associated armed force andgroups prevention demobilization reintegration programme derives cape town principle best practice 1997 term child soldier refers person 18 year age part kind regular irregular armed force armed group capacity including limited cook porter messenger anyone accompanying group family member definition includes girl recruited sexual purpose forced marriage therefore refer child carrying carried arm nin february 2000 report un security council secretarygeneral defined child soldier person age 18 year age form part armed force capacity accompanying group purely family member well girl recruited sexual purpose forced marriage crc specifies child every human age 18nthe term child associated armed force group although cumbersome used avoid perception child concern combatant boy point child eligible release reintegration programme associated armed force group fled armed force group often considered deserter therefore requiring support protection child abducted forcibly married detentionnaccess demobilization depend child level involvement armed force group distinction made combatant noncombatant fear unfair treatment oversight exclusion mainly girl nevertheless child personal history activity armed conflict help decide kind support heshe need reintegration phase", "ProcessedSent": "crc specifies child every human age 18nthe term child associated armed force group although cumbersome used avoid perception child concern combatant boy", "SentID": 90 }, { "ParagraphID": 45, - "Paragraph": "The definition commonly applied to children associated with armed forces andGroups in prevention, demobilization and reintegration programmes derives from the Cape Town Principles and Best Practices (1997), in which the term \u2018child soldier\u2019 refers to: \u201cAny person under 18 years of age who is part of any kind of regular or irregular armed force or armed group in any capacity, including, but not limited to: cooks, porters, messengers and anyone accompanying such groups, other than family members. The definition includes girls recruited for sexual purposes and for forced marriage. It does not, therefore, only refer to a child who is carrying or has carried arms.\u201d\\nIn his February 2000 report to the UN Security Council, the SecretaryGeneral defined a child soldier \u201cas any person under the age 18 years of age who forms part of an armed force in any capacity and those accompanying such groups, other than purely as family members, as well as girls recruited for sexual purposes and forced marriage\u201d. The CRC specifies that a child is every human below the age of 18.\\nThe term \u2018children associated with armed forces and groups\u2019, although more cumbersome, is now used to avoid the perception that the only children of concern are combatant boys. It points out that children eligible for release and reintegration programmes are both those associated with armed forces and groups and those who fled armed forces and groups (often considered as deserters and therefore requiring support and protection), children who were abducted, those forcibly married and those in detention.\\nAccess to demobilization does not depend on a child\u2019s level of involvement in armed forces and groups. No distinction is made between combatants and non-combatants for fear of unfair treatment, oversight or exclusion (mainly of girls). Nevertheless, the child\u2019s personal history and activities in the armed conflict can help decide on the kind of support he\/she needs in the reintegration phase.", + "Paragraph": "The definition commonly applied to children associated with armed forces andGroups in prevention, demobilization and reintegration programmes derives from the Cape Town Principles and Best Practices (1997), in which the term \u2018child soldier\u2019 refers to: \u201cAny person under 18 years of age who is part of any kind of regular or irregular armed force or armed group in any capacity, including, but not limited to: cooks, porters, messengers and anyone accompanying such groups, other than family members. The definition includes girls recruited for sexual purposes and for forced marriage. It does not, therefore, only refer to a child who is carrying or has carried arms.\u201d\nIn his February 2000 report to the UN Security Council, the SecretaryGeneral defined a child soldier \u201cas any person under the age 18 years of age who forms part of an armed force in any capacity and those accompanying such groups, other than purely as family members, as well as girls recruited for sexual purposes and forced marriage\u201d. The CRC specifies that a child is every human below the age of 18.\nThe term \u2018children associated with armed forces and groups\u2019, although more cumbersome, is now used to avoid the perception that the only children of concern are combatant boys. It points out that children eligible for release and reintegration programmes are both those associated with armed forces and groups and those who fled armed forces and groups (often considered as deserters and therefore requiring support and protection), children who were abducted, those forcibly married and those in detention.\nAccess to demobilization does not depend on a child\u2019s level of involvement in armed forces and groups. No distinction is made between combatants and non-combatants for fear of unfair treatment, oversight or exclusion (mainly of girls). Nevertheless, the child\u2019s personal history and activities in the armed conflict can help decide on the kind of support he\/she needs in the reintegration phase.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -1650,14 +1650,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "It points out that children eligible for release and reintegration programmes are both those associated with armed forces and groups and those who fled armed forces and groups (often considered as deserters and therefore requiring support and protection), children who were abducted, those forcibly married and those in detention.\\nAccess to demobilization does not depend on a child\u2019s level of involvement in armed forces and groups.", + "Sentence": "It points out that children eligible for release and reintegration programmes are both those associated with armed forces and groups and those who fled armed forces and groups (often considered as deserters and therefore requiring support and protection), children who were abducted, those forcibly married and those in detention.\nAccess to demobilization does not depend on a child\u2019s level of involvement in armed forces and groups.", "newParagraph": "definition commonly applied child associated armed force andgroups prevention demobilization reintegration programme derives cape town principle best practice 1997 term child soldier refers person 18 year age part kind regular irregular armed force armed group capacity including limited cook porter messenger anyone accompanying group family member definition includes girl recruited sexual purpose forced marriage therefore refer child carrying carried arm nin february 2000 report un security council secretarygeneral defined child soldier person age 18 year age form part armed force capacity accompanying group purely family member well girl recruited sexual purpose forced marriage crc specifies child every human age 18nthe term child associated armed force group although cumbersome used avoid perception child concern combatant boy point child eligible release reintegration programme associated armed force group fled armed force group often considered deserter therefore requiring support protection child abducted forcibly married detentionnaccess demobilization depend child level involvement armed force group distinction made combatant noncombatant fear unfair treatment oversight exclusion mainly girl nevertheless child personal history activity armed conflict help decide kind support heshe need reintegration phase", "ProcessedSent": "point child eligible release reintegration programme associated armed force group fled armed force group often considered deserter therefore requiring support protection child abducted forcibly married detentionnaccess demobilization depend child level involvement armed force group", "SentID": 91 }, { "ParagraphID": 45, - "Paragraph": "The definition commonly applied to children associated with armed forces andGroups in prevention, demobilization and reintegration programmes derives from the Cape Town Principles and Best Practices (1997), in which the term \u2018child soldier\u2019 refers to: \u201cAny person under 18 years of age who is part of any kind of regular or irregular armed force or armed group in any capacity, including, but not limited to: cooks, porters, messengers and anyone accompanying such groups, other than family members. The definition includes girls recruited for sexual purposes and for forced marriage. It does not, therefore, only refer to a child who is carrying or has carried arms.\u201d\\nIn his February 2000 report to the UN Security Council, the SecretaryGeneral defined a child soldier \u201cas any person under the age 18 years of age who forms part of an armed force in any capacity and those accompanying such groups, other than purely as family members, as well as girls recruited for sexual purposes and forced marriage\u201d. The CRC specifies that a child is every human below the age of 18.\\nThe term \u2018children associated with armed forces and groups\u2019, although more cumbersome, is now used to avoid the perception that the only children of concern are combatant boys. It points out that children eligible for release and reintegration programmes are both those associated with armed forces and groups and those who fled armed forces and groups (often considered as deserters and therefore requiring support and protection), children who were abducted, those forcibly married and those in detention.\\nAccess to demobilization does not depend on a child\u2019s level of involvement in armed forces and groups. No distinction is made between combatants and non-combatants for fear of unfair treatment, oversight or exclusion (mainly of girls). Nevertheless, the child\u2019s personal history and activities in the armed conflict can help decide on the kind of support he\/she needs in the reintegration phase.", + "Paragraph": "The definition commonly applied to children associated with armed forces andGroups in prevention, demobilization and reintegration programmes derives from the Cape Town Principles and Best Practices (1997), in which the term \u2018child soldier\u2019 refers to: \u201cAny person under 18 years of age who is part of any kind of regular or irregular armed force or armed group in any capacity, including, but not limited to: cooks, porters, messengers and anyone accompanying such groups, other than family members. The definition includes girls recruited for sexual purposes and for forced marriage. It does not, therefore, only refer to a child who is carrying or has carried arms.\u201d\nIn his February 2000 report to the UN Security Council, the SecretaryGeneral defined a child soldier \u201cas any person under the age 18 years of age who forms part of an armed force in any capacity and those accompanying such groups, other than purely as family members, as well as girls recruited for sexual purposes and forced marriage\u201d. The CRC specifies that a child is every human below the age of 18.\nThe term \u2018children associated with armed forces and groups\u2019, although more cumbersome, is now used to avoid the perception that the only children of concern are combatant boys. It points out that children eligible for release and reintegration programmes are both those associated with armed forces and groups and those who fled armed forces and groups (often considered as deserters and therefore requiring support and protection), children who were abducted, those forcibly married and those in detention.\nAccess to demobilization does not depend on a child\u2019s level of involvement in armed forces and groups. No distinction is made between combatants and non-combatants for fear of unfair treatment, oversight or exclusion (mainly of girls). Nevertheless, the child\u2019s personal history and activities in the armed conflict can help decide on the kind of support he\/she needs in the reintegration phase.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -1675,7 +1675,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 45, - "Paragraph": "The definition commonly applied to children associated with armed forces andGroups in prevention, demobilization and reintegration programmes derives from the Cape Town Principles and Best Practices (1997), in which the term \u2018child soldier\u2019 refers to: \u201cAny person under 18 years of age who is part of any kind of regular or irregular armed force or armed group in any capacity, including, but not limited to: cooks, porters, messengers and anyone accompanying such groups, other than family members. The definition includes girls recruited for sexual purposes and for forced marriage. It does not, therefore, only refer to a child who is carrying or has carried arms.\u201d\\nIn his February 2000 report to the UN Security Council, the SecretaryGeneral defined a child soldier \u201cas any person under the age 18 years of age who forms part of an armed force in any capacity and those accompanying such groups, other than purely as family members, as well as girls recruited for sexual purposes and forced marriage\u201d. The CRC specifies that a child is every human below the age of 18.\\nThe term \u2018children associated with armed forces and groups\u2019, although more cumbersome, is now used to avoid the perception that the only children of concern are combatant boys. It points out that children eligible for release and reintegration programmes are both those associated with armed forces and groups and those who fled armed forces and groups (often considered as deserters and therefore requiring support and protection), children who were abducted, those forcibly married and those in detention.\\nAccess to demobilization does not depend on a child\u2019s level of involvement in armed forces and groups. No distinction is made between combatants and non-combatants for fear of unfair treatment, oversight or exclusion (mainly of girls). Nevertheless, the child\u2019s personal history and activities in the armed conflict can help decide on the kind of support he\/she needs in the reintegration phase.", + "Paragraph": "The definition commonly applied to children associated with armed forces andGroups in prevention, demobilization and reintegration programmes derives from the Cape Town Principles and Best Practices (1997), in which the term \u2018child soldier\u2019 refers to: \u201cAny person under 18 years of age who is part of any kind of regular or irregular armed force or armed group in any capacity, including, but not limited to: cooks, porters, messengers and anyone accompanying such groups, other than family members. The definition includes girls recruited for sexual purposes and for forced marriage. It does not, therefore, only refer to a child who is carrying or has carried arms.\u201d\nIn his February 2000 report to the UN Security Council, the SecretaryGeneral defined a child soldier \u201cas any person under the age 18 years of age who forms part of an armed force in any capacity and those accompanying such groups, other than purely as family members, as well as girls recruited for sexual purposes and forced marriage\u201d. The CRC specifies that a child is every human below the age of 18.\nThe term \u2018children associated with armed forces and groups\u2019, although more cumbersome, is now used to avoid the perception that the only children of concern are combatant boys. It points out that children eligible for release and reintegration programmes are both those associated with armed forces and groups and those who fled armed forces and groups (often considered as deserters and therefore requiring support and protection), children who were abducted, those forcibly married and those in detention.\nAccess to demobilization does not depend on a child\u2019s level of involvement in armed forces and groups. No distinction is made between combatants and non-combatants for fear of unfair treatment, oversight or exclusion (mainly of girls). Nevertheless, the child\u2019s personal history and activities in the armed conflict can help decide on the kind of support he\/she needs in the reintegration phase.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -1693,7 +1693,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 46, - "Paragraph": "The term \u2018demobilization\u2019 refers to ending a child\u2019s association with armed forces or groups. The terms \u2018release\u2019 or \u2018exit from an armed force or group\u2019 and \u2018children coming or exiting from armed forces and groups\u2019 rather than \u2018demobilized children\u2019 are preferred.\\nChild demobilization\/release is very brief and involves removing a child from a military or armed group as swiftly as possible. This action may require official documentation (e.g., issuing a demobilization card or official registration in a database for ex-combatants) to confirm that the child has no military status, although formal documentation must be used carefully so that it does not stigmatize an already-vulnerable child.", + "Paragraph": "The term \u2018demobilization\u2019 refers to ending a child\u2019s association with armed forces or groups. The terms \u2018release\u2019 or \u2018exit from an armed force or group\u2019 and \u2018children coming or exiting from armed forces and groups\u2019 rather than \u2018demobilized children\u2019 are preferred.\nChild demobilization\/release is very brief and involves removing a child from a military or armed group as swiftly as possible. This action may require official documentation (e.g., issuing a demobilization card or official registration in a database for ex-combatants) to confirm that the child has no military status, although formal documentation must be used carefully so that it does not stigmatize an already-vulnerable child.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -1711,7 +1711,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 46, - "Paragraph": "The term \u2018demobilization\u2019 refers to ending a child\u2019s association with armed forces or groups. The terms \u2018release\u2019 or \u2018exit from an armed force or group\u2019 and \u2018children coming or exiting from armed forces and groups\u2019 rather than \u2018demobilized children\u2019 are preferred.\\nChild demobilization\/release is very brief and involves removing a child from a military or armed group as swiftly as possible. This action may require official documentation (e.g., issuing a demobilization card or official registration in a database for ex-combatants) to confirm that the child has no military status, although formal documentation must be used carefully so that it does not stigmatize an already-vulnerable child.", + "Paragraph": "The term \u2018demobilization\u2019 refers to ending a child\u2019s association with armed forces or groups. The terms \u2018release\u2019 or \u2018exit from an armed force or group\u2019 and \u2018children coming or exiting from armed forces and groups\u2019 rather than \u2018demobilized children\u2019 are preferred.\nChild demobilization\/release is very brief and involves removing a child from a military or armed group as swiftly as possible. This action may require official documentation (e.g., issuing a demobilization card or official registration in a database for ex-combatants) to confirm that the child has no military status, although formal documentation must be used carefully so that it does not stigmatize an already-vulnerable child.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -1722,14 +1722,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The terms \u2018release\u2019 or \u2018exit from an armed force or group\u2019 and \u2018children coming or exiting from armed forces and groups\u2019 rather than \u2018demobilized children\u2019 are preferred.\\nChild demobilization\/release is very brief and involves removing a child from a military or armed group as swiftly as possible.", + "Sentence": "The terms \u2018release\u2019 or \u2018exit from an armed force or group\u2019 and \u2018children coming or exiting from armed forces and groups\u2019 rather than \u2018demobilized children\u2019 are preferred.\nChild demobilization\/release is very brief and involves removing a child from a military or armed group as swiftly as possible.", "newParagraph": "term demobilization refers ending child association armed force group term release exit armed force group child coming exiting armed force group rather demobilized child preferrednchild demobilizationrelease brief involves removing child military armed group swiftly possible action may require official documentation eg issuing demobilization card official registration database excombatants confirm child military status although formal documentation must used carefully stigmatize alreadyvulnerable child", "ProcessedSent": "term release exit armed force group child coming exiting armed force group rather demobilized child preferrednchild demobilizationrelease brief involves removing child military armed group swiftly possible", "SentID": 95 }, { "ParagraphID": 46, - "Paragraph": "The term \u2018demobilization\u2019 refers to ending a child\u2019s association with armed forces or groups. The terms \u2018release\u2019 or \u2018exit from an armed force or group\u2019 and \u2018children coming or exiting from armed forces and groups\u2019 rather than \u2018demobilized children\u2019 are preferred.\\nChild demobilization\/release is very brief and involves removing a child from a military or armed group as swiftly as possible. This action may require official documentation (e.g., issuing a demobilization card or official registration in a database for ex-combatants) to confirm that the child has no military status, although formal documentation must be used carefully so that it does not stigmatize an already-vulnerable child.", + "Paragraph": "The term \u2018demobilization\u2019 refers to ending a child\u2019s association with armed forces or groups. The terms \u2018release\u2019 or \u2018exit from an armed force or group\u2019 and \u2018children coming or exiting from armed forces and groups\u2019 rather than \u2018demobilized children\u2019 are preferred.\nChild demobilization\/release is very brief and involves removing a child from a military or armed group as swiftly as possible. This action may require official documentation (e.g., issuing a demobilization card or official registration in a database for ex-combatants) to confirm that the child has no military status, although formal documentation must be used carefully so that it does not stigmatize an already-vulnerable child.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -1747,7 +1747,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 47, - "Paragraph": "According to article 39 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, \u201cStates parties shall take all appropriate measures to promote . . . social reintegration of a child victim of . . . armed conflicts\u201d.\\nReintegration includes family reunification, mobilizing and enabling the child\u2019s existing care system, medical screening and health care, schooling and\/or vocational training, psychosocial support, and social and community-based reintegration. Reintegration programmes need to be sustainable and to take into account children\u2019s aspirations.", + "Paragraph": "According to article 39 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, \u201cStates parties shall take all appropriate measures to promote . . . social reintegration of a child victim of . . . armed conflicts\u201d.\nReintegration includes family reunification, mobilizing and enabling the child\u2019s existing care system, medical screening and health care, schooling and\/or vocational training, psychosocial support, and social and community-based reintegration. Reintegration programmes need to be sustainable and to take into account children\u2019s aspirations.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -1765,7 +1765,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 47, - "Paragraph": "According to article 39 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, \u201cStates parties shall take all appropriate measures to promote . . . social reintegration of a child victim of . . . armed conflicts\u201d.\\nReintegration includes family reunification, mobilizing and enabling the child\u2019s existing care system, medical screening and health care, schooling and\/or vocational training, psychosocial support, and social and community-based reintegration. Reintegration programmes need to be sustainable and to take into account children\u2019s aspirations.", + "Paragraph": "According to article 39 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, \u201cStates parties shall take all appropriate measures to promote . . . social reintegration of a child victim of . . . armed conflicts\u201d.\nReintegration includes family reunification, mobilizing and enabling the child\u2019s existing care system, medical screening and health care, schooling and\/or vocational training, psychosocial support, and social and community-based reintegration. Reintegration programmes need to be sustainable and to take into account children\u2019s aspirations.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -1783,7 +1783,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 47, - "Paragraph": "According to article 39 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, \u201cStates parties shall take all appropriate measures to promote . . . social reintegration of a child victim of . . . armed conflicts\u201d.\\nReintegration includes family reunification, mobilizing and enabling the child\u2019s existing care system, medical screening and health care, schooling and\/or vocational training, psychosocial support, and social and community-based reintegration. Reintegration programmes need to be sustainable and to take into account children\u2019s aspirations.", + "Paragraph": "According to article 39 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, \u201cStates parties shall take all appropriate measures to promote . . . social reintegration of a child victim of . . . armed conflicts\u201d.\nReintegration includes family reunification, mobilizing and enabling the child\u2019s existing care system, medical screening and health care, schooling and\/or vocational training, psychosocial support, and social and community-based reintegration. Reintegration programmes need to be sustainable and to take into account children\u2019s aspirations.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -1794,14 +1794,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": ". . armed conflicts\u201d.\\nReintegration includes family reunification, mobilizing and enabling the child\u2019s existing care system, medical screening and health care, schooling and\/or vocational training, psychosocial support, and social and community-based reintegration.", + "Sentence": ". . armed conflicts\u201d.\nReintegration includes family reunification, mobilizing and enabling the child\u2019s existing care system, medical screening and health care, schooling and\/or vocational training, psychosocial support, and social and community-based reintegration.", "newParagraph": "according article 39 convention right child state party shall take appropriate measure promote social reintegration child victim armed conflict nreintegration includes family reunification mobilizing enabling child existing care system medical screening health care schooling andor vocational training psychosocial support social communitybased reintegration reintegration programme need sustainable take account child aspiration", "ProcessedSent": " armed conflict nreintegration includes family reunification mobilizing enabling child existing care system medical screening health care schooling andor vocational training psychosocial support social communitybased reintegration", "SentID": 99 }, { "ParagraphID": 47, - "Paragraph": "According to article 39 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, \u201cStates parties shall take all appropriate measures to promote . . . social reintegration of a child victim of . . . armed conflicts\u201d.\\nReintegration includes family reunification, mobilizing and enabling the child\u2019s existing care system, medical screening and health care, schooling and\/or vocational training, psychosocial support, and social and community-based reintegration. Reintegration programmes need to be sustainable and to take into account children\u2019s aspirations.", + "Paragraph": "According to article 39 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, \u201cStates parties shall take all appropriate measures to promote . . . social reintegration of a child victim of . . . armed conflicts\u201d.\nReintegration includes family reunification, mobilizing and enabling the child\u2019s existing care system, medical screening and health care, schooling and\/or vocational training, psychosocial support, and social and community-based reintegration. Reintegration programmes need to be sustainable and to take into account children\u2019s aspirations.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -1891,7 +1891,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 50, - "Paragraph": "Based on an analogy with the definition set out in the Third Geneva Convention of 1949 relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War in relation to persons engaged in international armed conflicts, a combatant is a person who:\\nis a member of a national army or an irregular military organization; or \\nis actively participating in military activities and hostilities; or\\nis involved in recruiting or training military personnel; or \\nholds a command or decision-making position within a national army or an armed organization; or \\narrived in a host country carrying arms or in military uniform or as part of a military structure; or \\nhaving arrived in a host country as an ordinary civilian, thereafter assumes, or shows determination to assume, any of the above attributes.", + "Paragraph": "Based on an analogy with the definition set out in the Third Geneva Convention of 1949 relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War in relation to persons engaged in international armed conflicts, a combatant is a person who:\nis a member of a national army or an irregular military organization; or \nis actively participating in military activities and hostilities; or\nis involved in recruiting or training military personnel; or \nholds a command or decision-making position within a national army or an armed organization; or \narrived in a host country carrying arms or in military uniform or as part of a military structure; or \nhaving arrived in a host country as an ordinary civilian, thereafter assumes, or shows determination to assume, any of the above attributes.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -1902,7 +1902,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Based on an analogy with the definition set out in the Third Geneva Convention of 1949 relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War in relation to persons engaged in international armed conflicts, a combatant is a person who:\\nis a member of a national army or an irregular military organization; or \\nis actively participating in military activities and hostilities; or\\nis involved in recruiting or training military personnel; or \\nholds a command or decision-making position within a national army or an armed organization; or \\narrived in a host country carrying arms or in military uniform or as part of a military structure; or \\nhaving arrived in a host country as an ordinary civilian, thereafter assumes, or shows determination to assume, any of the above attributes.", + "Sentence": "Based on an analogy with the definition set out in the Third Geneva Convention of 1949 relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War in relation to persons engaged in international armed conflicts, a combatant is a person who:\nis a member of a national army or an irregular military organization; or \nis actively participating in military activities and hostilities; or\nis involved in recruiting or training military personnel; or \nholds a command or decision-making position within a national army or an armed organization; or \narrived in a host country carrying arms or in military uniform or as part of a military structure; or \nhaving arrived in a host country as an ordinary civilian, thereafter assumes, or shows determination to assume, any of the above attributes.", "newParagraph": "based analogy definition set third geneva convention 1949 relative treatment prisoner war relation person engaged international armed conflict combatant person whonis member national army irregular military organization ni actively participating military activity hostility ornis involved recruiting training military personnel nholds command decisionmaking position within national army armed organization narrived host country carrying arm military uniform part military structure nhaving arrived host country ordinary civilian thereafter assumes show determination assume attribute", "ProcessedSent": "based analogy definition set third geneva convention 1949 relative treatment prisoner war relation person engaged international armed conflict combatant person whonis member national army irregular military organization ni actively participating military activity hostility ornis involved recruiting training military personnel nholds command decisionmaking position within national army armed organization narrived host country carrying arm military uniform part military structure nhaving arrived host country ordinary civilian thereafter assumes show determination assume attribute", "SentID": 105 @@ -1963,7 +1963,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 53, - "Paragraph": "In the context of SALW, the term refers to a process designed to place the needs and priorities of affected communities at the centre of the planning, implementation and monitoring of SALW control and other sectors.\\nCommunity involvement is based on an exchange of information and involves communities in the decision-making process in order to establish priorities for SALW control. In this way, SALW control aims to be inclusive, community focused and ensure the maximum involvement of all sections of the community. This involvement includes joint planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of projects.\\nCommunity involvement also works with communities to develop specific interim safety strategies that encourage individual and community behavioural change. This is designed to reduce the impact of SALW on individuals and communities until such time as the threat is removed.", + "Paragraph": "In the context of SALW, the term refers to a process designed to place the needs and priorities of affected communities at the centre of the planning, implementation and monitoring of SALW control and other sectors.\nCommunity involvement is based on an exchange of information and involves communities in the decision-making process in order to establish priorities for SALW control. In this way, SALW control aims to be inclusive, community focused and ensure the maximum involvement of all sections of the community. This involvement includes joint planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of projects.\nCommunity involvement also works with communities to develop specific interim safety strategies that encourage individual and community behavioural change. This is designed to reduce the impact of SALW on individuals and communities until such time as the threat is removed.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -1974,14 +1974,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "In the context of SALW, the term refers to a process designed to place the needs and priorities of affected communities at the centre of the planning, implementation and monitoring of SALW control and other sectors.\\nCommunity involvement is based on an exchange of information and involves communities in the decision-making process in order to establish priorities for SALW control.", + "Sentence": "In the context of SALW, the term refers to a process designed to place the needs and priorities of affected communities at the centre of the planning, implementation and monitoring of SALW control and other sectors.\nCommunity involvement is based on an exchange of information and involves communities in the decision-making process in order to establish priorities for SALW control.", "newParagraph": "context salw term refers process designed place need priority affected community centre planning implementation monitoring salw control sectorsncommunity involvement based exchange information involves community decisionmaking process order establish priority salw control way salw control aim inclusive community focused ensure maximum involvement section community involvement includes joint planning implementation monitoring evaluation projectsncommunity involvement also work community develop specific interim safety strategy encourage individual community behavioural change designed reduce impact salw individual community time threat removed", "ProcessedSent": "context salw term refers process designed place need priority affected community centre planning implementation monitoring salw control sectorsncommunity involvement based exchange information involves community decisionmaking process order establish priority salw control", "SentID": 109 }, { "ParagraphID": 53, - "Paragraph": "In the context of SALW, the term refers to a process designed to place the needs and priorities of affected communities at the centre of the planning, implementation and monitoring of SALW control and other sectors.\\nCommunity involvement is based on an exchange of information and involves communities in the decision-making process in order to establish priorities for SALW control. In this way, SALW control aims to be inclusive, community focused and ensure the maximum involvement of all sections of the community. This involvement includes joint planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of projects.\\nCommunity involvement also works with communities to develop specific interim safety strategies that encourage individual and community behavioural change. This is designed to reduce the impact of SALW on individuals and communities until such time as the threat is removed.", + "Paragraph": "In the context of SALW, the term refers to a process designed to place the needs and priorities of affected communities at the centre of the planning, implementation and monitoring of SALW control and other sectors.\nCommunity involvement is based on an exchange of information and involves communities in the decision-making process in order to establish priorities for SALW control. In this way, SALW control aims to be inclusive, community focused and ensure the maximum involvement of all sections of the community. This involvement includes joint planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of projects.\nCommunity involvement also works with communities to develop specific interim safety strategies that encourage individual and community behavioural change. This is designed to reduce the impact of SALW on individuals and communities until such time as the threat is removed.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -1999,7 +1999,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 53, - "Paragraph": "In the context of SALW, the term refers to a process designed to place the needs and priorities of affected communities at the centre of the planning, implementation and monitoring of SALW control and other sectors.\\nCommunity involvement is based on an exchange of information and involves communities in the decision-making process in order to establish priorities for SALW control. In this way, SALW control aims to be inclusive, community focused and ensure the maximum involvement of all sections of the community. This involvement includes joint planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of projects.\\nCommunity involvement also works with communities to develop specific interim safety strategies that encourage individual and community behavioural change. This is designed to reduce the impact of SALW on individuals and communities until such time as the threat is removed.", + "Paragraph": "In the context of SALW, the term refers to a process designed to place the needs and priorities of affected communities at the centre of the planning, implementation and monitoring of SALW control and other sectors.\nCommunity involvement is based on an exchange of information and involves communities in the decision-making process in order to establish priorities for SALW control. In this way, SALW control aims to be inclusive, community focused and ensure the maximum involvement of all sections of the community. This involvement includes joint planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of projects.\nCommunity involvement also works with communities to develop specific interim safety strategies that encourage individual and community behavioural change. This is designed to reduce the impact of SALW on individuals and communities until such time as the threat is removed.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -2010,14 +2010,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This involvement includes joint planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of projects.\\nCommunity involvement also works with communities to develop specific interim safety strategies that encourage individual and community behavioural change.", + "Sentence": "This involvement includes joint planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of projects.\nCommunity involvement also works with communities to develop specific interim safety strategies that encourage individual and community behavioural change.", "newParagraph": "context salw term refers process designed place need priority affected community centre planning implementation monitoring salw control sectorsncommunity involvement based exchange information involves community decisionmaking process order establish priority salw control way salw control aim inclusive community focused ensure maximum involvement section community involvement includes joint planning implementation monitoring evaluation projectsncommunity involvement also work community develop specific interim safety strategy encourage individual community behavioural change designed reduce impact salw individual community time threat removed", "ProcessedSent": "involvement includes joint planning implementation monitoring evaluation projectsncommunity involvement also work community develop specific interim safety strategy encourage individual community behavioural change", "SentID": 111 }, { "ParagraphID": 53, - "Paragraph": "In the context of SALW, the term refers to a process designed to place the needs and priorities of affected communities at the centre of the planning, implementation and monitoring of SALW control and other sectors.\\nCommunity involvement is based on an exchange of information and involves communities in the decision-making process in order to establish priorities for SALW control. In this way, SALW control aims to be inclusive, community focused and ensure the maximum involvement of all sections of the community. This involvement includes joint planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of projects.\\nCommunity involvement also works with communities to develop specific interim safety strategies that encourage individual and community behavioural change. This is designed to reduce the impact of SALW on individuals and communities until such time as the threat is removed.", + "Paragraph": "In the context of SALW, the term refers to a process designed to place the needs and priorities of affected communities at the centre of the planning, implementation and monitoring of SALW control and other sectors.\nCommunity involvement is based on an exchange of information and involves communities in the decision-making process in order to establish priorities for SALW control. In this way, SALW control aims to be inclusive, community focused and ensure the maximum involvement of all sections of the community. This involvement includes joint planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of projects.\nCommunity involvement also works with communities to develop specific interim safety strategies that encourage individual and community behavioural change. This is designed to reduce the impact of SALW on individuals and communities until such time as the threat is removed.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -2125,7 +2125,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 56, - "Paragraph": "Process employed by States with the aim of diffusing tensions and building sustainable peace.\\nConflict reduction strategies may include programmes designed to build national and local capacity to settle disputes; encouraging the establishment of coordinated conflict prevention policies among international actors, and assisting countries in reducing the spread of arms.", + "Paragraph": "Process employed by States with the aim of diffusing tensions and building sustainable peace.\nConflict reduction strategies may include programmes designed to build national and local capacity to settle disputes; encouraging the establishment of coordinated conflict prevention policies among international actors, and assisting countries in reducing the spread of arms.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -2136,7 +2136,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Process employed by States with the aim of diffusing tensions and building sustainable peace.\\nConflict reduction strategies may include programmes designed to build national and local capacity to settle disputes; encouraging the establishment of coordinated conflict prevention policies among international actors, and assisting countries in reducing the spread of arms.", + "Sentence": "Process employed by States with the aim of diffusing tensions and building sustainable peace.\nConflict reduction strategies may include programmes designed to build national and local capacity to settle disputes; encouraging the establishment of coordinated conflict prevention policies among international actors, and assisting countries in reducing the spread of arms.", "newParagraph": "process employed state aim diffusing tension building sustainable peacenconflict reduction strategy may include programme designed build national local capacity settle dispute encouraging establishment coordinated conflict prevention policy among international actor assisting country reducing spread arm", "ProcessedSent": "process employed state aim diffusing tension building sustainable peacenconflict reduction strategy may include programme designed build national local capacity settle dispute encouraging establishment coordinated conflict prevention policy among international actor assisting country reducing spread arm", "SentID": 118 @@ -2665,7 +2665,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 72, - "Paragraph": "Criteria that establish who will benefit from DDR assistance and who will not. there are five categories of people that should be taken into consideration in DDR programmes: (1) male and female adult combatants; (2) children associated with armed forces and groups; (3) those working in non-combat roles (including women); (4) ex-combatants with disabilities and chronic illnesses; and (5) dependants. \\nWhen deciding on who will benefit from DDR assistance, planners should be guided by three principles, which include: (1) focusing on improving security. DDR assistance should target groups that pose the greatest risk to peace, while paying careful attentions to laying the foundation for recovery and development; (2) balancing equity with security. Targeted assistance should be balanced against rewarding violence. Fairness should guide eligibility; and (3) achieving flexibility. \\nThe eligibility criteria are decided at the beginning of a DDR planning process and determine the cost, scope and duration of the DDR programme in question.", + "Paragraph": "Criteria that establish who will benefit from DDR assistance and who will not. there are five categories of people that should be taken into consideration in DDR programmes: (1) male and female adult combatants; (2) children associated with armed forces and groups; (3) those working in non-combat roles (including women); (4) ex-combatants with disabilities and chronic illnesses; and (5) dependants. \nWhen deciding on who will benefit from DDR assistance, planners should be guided by three principles, which include: (1) focusing on improving security. DDR assistance should target groups that pose the greatest risk to peace, while paying careful attentions to laying the foundation for recovery and development; (2) balancing equity with security. Targeted assistance should be balanced against rewarding violence. Fairness should guide eligibility; and (3) achieving flexibility. \nThe eligibility criteria are decided at the beginning of a DDR planning process and determine the cost, scope and duration of the DDR programme in question.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -2683,7 +2683,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 72, - "Paragraph": "Criteria that establish who will benefit from DDR assistance and who will not. there are five categories of people that should be taken into consideration in DDR programmes: (1) male and female adult combatants; (2) children associated with armed forces and groups; (3) those working in non-combat roles (including women); (4) ex-combatants with disabilities and chronic illnesses; and (5) dependants. \\nWhen deciding on who will benefit from DDR assistance, planners should be guided by three principles, which include: (1) focusing on improving security. DDR assistance should target groups that pose the greatest risk to peace, while paying careful attentions to laying the foundation for recovery and development; (2) balancing equity with security. Targeted assistance should be balanced against rewarding violence. Fairness should guide eligibility; and (3) achieving flexibility. \\nThe eligibility criteria are decided at the beginning of a DDR planning process and determine the cost, scope and duration of the DDR programme in question.", + "Paragraph": "Criteria that establish who will benefit from DDR assistance and who will not. there are five categories of people that should be taken into consideration in DDR programmes: (1) male and female adult combatants; (2) children associated with armed forces and groups; (3) those working in non-combat roles (including women); (4) ex-combatants with disabilities and chronic illnesses; and (5) dependants. \nWhen deciding on who will benefit from DDR assistance, planners should be guided by three principles, which include: (1) focusing on improving security. DDR assistance should target groups that pose the greatest risk to peace, while paying careful attentions to laying the foundation for recovery and development; (2) balancing equity with security. Targeted assistance should be balanced against rewarding violence. Fairness should guide eligibility; and (3) achieving flexibility. \nThe eligibility criteria are decided at the beginning of a DDR planning process and determine the cost, scope and duration of the DDR programme in question.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -2701,7 +2701,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 72, - "Paragraph": "Criteria that establish who will benefit from DDR assistance and who will not. there are five categories of people that should be taken into consideration in DDR programmes: (1) male and female adult combatants; (2) children associated with armed forces and groups; (3) those working in non-combat roles (including women); (4) ex-combatants with disabilities and chronic illnesses; and (5) dependants. \\nWhen deciding on who will benefit from DDR assistance, planners should be guided by three principles, which include: (1) focusing on improving security. DDR assistance should target groups that pose the greatest risk to peace, while paying careful attentions to laying the foundation for recovery and development; (2) balancing equity with security. Targeted assistance should be balanced against rewarding violence. Fairness should guide eligibility; and (3) achieving flexibility. \\nThe eligibility criteria are decided at the beginning of a DDR planning process and determine the cost, scope and duration of the DDR programme in question.", + "Paragraph": "Criteria that establish who will benefit from DDR assistance and who will not. there are five categories of people that should be taken into consideration in DDR programmes: (1) male and female adult combatants; (2) children associated with armed forces and groups; (3) those working in non-combat roles (including women); (4) ex-combatants with disabilities and chronic illnesses; and (5) dependants. \nWhen deciding on who will benefit from DDR assistance, planners should be guided by three principles, which include: (1) focusing on improving security. DDR assistance should target groups that pose the greatest risk to peace, while paying careful attentions to laying the foundation for recovery and development; (2) balancing equity with security. Targeted assistance should be balanced against rewarding violence. Fairness should guide eligibility; and (3) achieving flexibility. \nThe eligibility criteria are decided at the beginning of a DDR planning process and determine the cost, scope and duration of the DDR programme in question.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -2712,14 +2712,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nWhen deciding on who will benefit from DDR assistance, planners should be guided by three principles, which include: (1) focusing on improving security.", + "Sentence": "\nWhen deciding on who will benefit from DDR assistance, planners should be guided by three principles, which include: (1) focusing on improving security.", "newParagraph": "criterion establish benefit ddr assistance five category people taken consideration ddr programme 1 male female adult combatant 2 child associated armed force group 3 working noncombat role including woman 4 excombatants disability chronic illness 5 dependant nwhen deciding benefit ddr assistance planner guided three principle include 1 focusing improving security ddr assistance target group pose greatest risk peace paying careful attention laying foundation recovery development 2 balancing equity security targeted assistance balanced rewarding violence fairness guide eligibility 3 achieving flexibility nthe eligibility criterion decided beginning ddr planning process determine cost scope duration ddr programme question", "ProcessedSent": "nwhen deciding benefit ddr assistance planner guided three principle include 1 focusing improving security", "SentID": 150 }, { "ParagraphID": 72, - "Paragraph": "Criteria that establish who will benefit from DDR assistance and who will not. there are five categories of people that should be taken into consideration in DDR programmes: (1) male and female adult combatants; (2) children associated with armed forces and groups; (3) those working in non-combat roles (including women); (4) ex-combatants with disabilities and chronic illnesses; and (5) dependants. \\nWhen deciding on who will benefit from DDR assistance, planners should be guided by three principles, which include: (1) focusing on improving security. DDR assistance should target groups that pose the greatest risk to peace, while paying careful attentions to laying the foundation for recovery and development; (2) balancing equity with security. Targeted assistance should be balanced against rewarding violence. Fairness should guide eligibility; and (3) achieving flexibility. \\nThe eligibility criteria are decided at the beginning of a DDR planning process and determine the cost, scope and duration of the DDR programme in question.", + "Paragraph": "Criteria that establish who will benefit from DDR assistance and who will not. there are five categories of people that should be taken into consideration in DDR programmes: (1) male and female adult combatants; (2) children associated with armed forces and groups; (3) those working in non-combat roles (including women); (4) ex-combatants with disabilities and chronic illnesses; and (5) dependants. \nWhen deciding on who will benefit from DDR assistance, planners should be guided by three principles, which include: (1) focusing on improving security. DDR assistance should target groups that pose the greatest risk to peace, while paying careful attentions to laying the foundation for recovery and development; (2) balancing equity with security. Targeted assistance should be balanced against rewarding violence. Fairness should guide eligibility; and (3) achieving flexibility. \nThe eligibility criteria are decided at the beginning of a DDR planning process and determine the cost, scope and duration of the DDR programme in question.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -2737,7 +2737,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 72, - "Paragraph": "Criteria that establish who will benefit from DDR assistance and who will not. there are five categories of people that should be taken into consideration in DDR programmes: (1) male and female adult combatants; (2) children associated with armed forces and groups; (3) those working in non-combat roles (including women); (4) ex-combatants with disabilities and chronic illnesses; and (5) dependants. \\nWhen deciding on who will benefit from DDR assistance, planners should be guided by three principles, which include: (1) focusing on improving security. DDR assistance should target groups that pose the greatest risk to peace, while paying careful attentions to laying the foundation for recovery and development; (2) balancing equity with security. Targeted assistance should be balanced against rewarding violence. Fairness should guide eligibility; and (3) achieving flexibility. \\nThe eligibility criteria are decided at the beginning of a DDR planning process and determine the cost, scope and duration of the DDR programme in question.", + "Paragraph": "Criteria that establish who will benefit from DDR assistance and who will not. there are five categories of people that should be taken into consideration in DDR programmes: (1) male and female adult combatants; (2) children associated with armed forces and groups; (3) those working in non-combat roles (including women); (4) ex-combatants with disabilities and chronic illnesses; and (5) dependants. \nWhen deciding on who will benefit from DDR assistance, planners should be guided by three principles, which include: (1) focusing on improving security. DDR assistance should target groups that pose the greatest risk to peace, while paying careful attentions to laying the foundation for recovery and development; (2) balancing equity with security. Targeted assistance should be balanced against rewarding violence. Fairness should guide eligibility; and (3) achieving flexibility. \nThe eligibility criteria are decided at the beginning of a DDR planning process and determine the cost, scope and duration of the DDR programme in question.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -2755,7 +2755,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 72, - "Paragraph": "Criteria that establish who will benefit from DDR assistance and who will not. there are five categories of people that should be taken into consideration in DDR programmes: (1) male and female adult combatants; (2) children associated with armed forces and groups; (3) those working in non-combat roles (including women); (4) ex-combatants with disabilities and chronic illnesses; and (5) dependants. \\nWhen deciding on who will benefit from DDR assistance, planners should be guided by three principles, which include: (1) focusing on improving security. DDR assistance should target groups that pose the greatest risk to peace, while paying careful attentions to laying the foundation for recovery and development; (2) balancing equity with security. Targeted assistance should be balanced against rewarding violence. Fairness should guide eligibility; and (3) achieving flexibility. \\nThe eligibility criteria are decided at the beginning of a DDR planning process and determine the cost, scope and duration of the DDR programme in question.", + "Paragraph": "Criteria that establish who will benefit from DDR assistance and who will not. there are five categories of people that should be taken into consideration in DDR programmes: (1) male and female adult combatants; (2) children associated with armed forces and groups; (3) those working in non-combat roles (including women); (4) ex-combatants with disabilities and chronic illnesses; and (5) dependants. \nWhen deciding on who will benefit from DDR assistance, planners should be guided by three principles, which include: (1) focusing on improving security. DDR assistance should target groups that pose the greatest risk to peace, while paying careful attentions to laying the foundation for recovery and development; (2) balancing equity with security. Targeted assistance should be balanced against rewarding violence. Fairness should guide eligibility; and (3) achieving flexibility. \nThe eligibility criteria are decided at the beginning of a DDR planning process and determine the cost, scope and duration of the DDR programme in question.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -2773,7 +2773,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 72, - "Paragraph": "Criteria that establish who will benefit from DDR assistance and who will not. there are five categories of people that should be taken into consideration in DDR programmes: (1) male and female adult combatants; (2) children associated with armed forces and groups; (3) those working in non-combat roles (including women); (4) ex-combatants with disabilities and chronic illnesses; and (5) dependants. \\nWhen deciding on who will benefit from DDR assistance, planners should be guided by three principles, which include: (1) focusing on improving security. DDR assistance should target groups that pose the greatest risk to peace, while paying careful attentions to laying the foundation for recovery and development; (2) balancing equity with security. Targeted assistance should be balanced against rewarding violence. Fairness should guide eligibility; and (3) achieving flexibility. \\nThe eligibility criteria are decided at the beginning of a DDR planning process and determine the cost, scope and duration of the DDR programme in question.", + "Paragraph": "Criteria that establish who will benefit from DDR assistance and who will not. there are five categories of people that should be taken into consideration in DDR programmes: (1) male and female adult combatants; (2) children associated with armed forces and groups; (3) those working in non-combat roles (including women); (4) ex-combatants with disabilities and chronic illnesses; and (5) dependants. \nWhen deciding on who will benefit from DDR assistance, planners should be guided by three principles, which include: (1) focusing on improving security. DDR assistance should target groups that pose the greatest risk to peace, while paying careful attentions to laying the foundation for recovery and development; (2) balancing equity with security. Targeted assistance should be balanced against rewarding violence. Fairness should guide eligibility; and (3) achieving flexibility. \nThe eligibility criteria are decided at the beginning of a DDR planning process and determine the cost, scope and duration of the DDR programme in question.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -2784,7 +2784,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nThe eligibility criteria are decided at the beginning of a DDR planning process and determine the cost, scope and duration of the DDR programme in question.", + "Sentence": "\nThe eligibility criteria are decided at the beginning of a DDR planning process and determine the cost, scope and duration of the DDR programme in question.", "newParagraph": "criterion establish benefit ddr assistance five category people taken consideration ddr programme 1 male female adult combatant 2 child associated armed force group 3 working noncombat role including woman 4 excombatants disability chronic illness 5 dependant nwhen deciding benefit ddr assistance planner guided three principle include 1 focusing improving security ddr assistance target group pose greatest risk peace paying careful attention laying foundation recovery development 2 balancing equity security targeted assistance balanced rewarding violence fairness guide eligibility 3 achieving flexibility nthe eligibility criterion decided beginning ddr planning process determine cost scope duration ddr programme question", "ProcessedSent": "nthe eligibility criterion decided beginning ddr planning process determine cost scope duration ddr programme question", "SentID": 154 @@ -3943,7 +3943,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 96, - "Paragraph": "Policies that utilize gender analysis in their formulation and design, and recognize gender differences in terms of needs, interests, priorities, power and roles. They further recognize that both men and women are active development actors for their community. Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \\nGender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs. \\nGender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations. These policies use knowledge of gender difference to respond to the practical gender needs of women or men. \\nGender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs. These policies can target both sexes together, or separately. Interventions may focus on women\u2019s and\/or men\u2019s practical gender needs, but with the objective of creating a conducive environment in which women or men can empower themselve", + "Paragraph": "Policies that utilize gender analysis in their formulation and design, and recognize gender differences in terms of needs, interests, priorities, power and roles. They further recognize that both men and women are active development actors for their community. Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \nGender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs. \nGender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations. These policies use knowledge of gender difference to respond to the practical gender needs of women or men. \nGender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs. These policies can target both sexes together, or separately. Interventions may focus on women\u2019s and\/or men\u2019s practical gender needs, but with the objective of creating a conducive environment in which women or men can empower themselve", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -3961,7 +3961,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 96, - "Paragraph": "Policies that utilize gender analysis in their formulation and design, and recognize gender differences in terms of needs, interests, priorities, power and roles. They further recognize that both men and women are active development actors for their community. Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \\nGender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs. \\nGender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations. These policies use knowledge of gender difference to respond to the practical gender needs of women or men. \\nGender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs. These policies can target both sexes together, or separately. Interventions may focus on women\u2019s and\/or men\u2019s practical gender needs, but with the objective of creating a conducive environment in which women or men can empower themselve", + "Paragraph": "Policies that utilize gender analysis in their formulation and design, and recognize gender differences in terms of needs, interests, priorities, power and roles. They further recognize that both men and women are active development actors for their community. Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \nGender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs. \nGender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations. These policies use knowledge of gender difference to respond to the practical gender needs of women or men. \nGender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs. These policies can target both sexes together, or separately. Interventions may focus on women\u2019s and\/or men\u2019s practical gender needs, but with the objective of creating a conducive environment in which women or men can empower themselve", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -3979,7 +3979,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 96, - "Paragraph": "Policies that utilize gender analysis in their formulation and design, and recognize gender differences in terms of needs, interests, priorities, power and roles. They further recognize that both men and women are active development actors for their community. Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \\nGender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs. \\nGender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations. These policies use knowledge of gender difference to respond to the practical gender needs of women or men. \\nGender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs. These policies can target both sexes together, or separately. Interventions may focus on women\u2019s and\/or men\u2019s practical gender needs, but with the objective of creating a conducive environment in which women or men can empower themselve", + "Paragraph": "Policies that utilize gender analysis in their formulation and design, and recognize gender differences in terms of needs, interests, priorities, power and roles. They further recognize that both men and women are active development actors for their community. Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \nGender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs. \nGender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations. These policies use knowledge of gender difference to respond to the practical gender needs of women or men. \nGender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs. These policies can target both sexes together, or separately. Interventions may focus on women\u2019s and\/or men\u2019s practical gender needs, but with the objective of creating a conducive environment in which women or men can empower themselve", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -3990,14 +3990,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \\nGender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs.", + "Sentence": "Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \nGender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs.", "newParagraph": "policy utilize gender analysis formulation design recognize gender difference term need interest priority power role recognize men woman active development actor community genderaware policy divided following three policy ngenderneutral policy use knowledge gender difference society reduce bias development work order enable woman men meet practical gender need ngenderspecific policy based understanding existing gendered division resource responsibility gender power relation policy use knowledge gender difference respond practical gender need woman men ngendertransformative policy consist intervention attempt transform existing distribution power resource create balanced relationship among woman men girl boy responding strategic gender need policy target sex together separately intervention may focus woman andor men practical gender need objective creating conducive environment woman men empower themselve", "ProcessedSent": "genderaware policy divided following three policy ngenderneutral policy use knowledge gender difference society reduce bias development work order enable woman men meet practical gender need", "SentID": 221 }, { "ParagraphID": 96, - "Paragraph": "Policies that utilize gender analysis in their formulation and design, and recognize gender differences in terms of needs, interests, priorities, power and roles. They further recognize that both men and women are active development actors for their community. Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \\nGender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs. \\nGender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations. These policies use knowledge of gender difference to respond to the practical gender needs of women or men. \\nGender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs. These policies can target both sexes together, or separately. Interventions may focus on women\u2019s and\/or men\u2019s practical gender needs, but with the objective of creating a conducive environment in which women or men can empower themselve", + "Paragraph": "Policies that utilize gender analysis in their formulation and design, and recognize gender differences in terms of needs, interests, priorities, power and roles. They further recognize that both men and women are active development actors for their community. Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \nGender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs. \nGender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations. These policies use knowledge of gender difference to respond to the practical gender needs of women or men. \nGender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs. These policies can target both sexes together, or separately. Interventions may focus on women\u2019s and\/or men\u2019s practical gender needs, but with the objective of creating a conducive environment in which women or men can empower themselve", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -4008,14 +4008,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nGender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations.", + "Sentence": "\nGender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations.", "newParagraph": "policy utilize gender analysis formulation design recognize gender difference term need interest priority power role recognize men woman active development actor community genderaware policy divided following three policy ngenderneutral policy use knowledge gender difference society reduce bias development work order enable woman men meet practical gender need ngenderspecific policy based understanding existing gendered division resource responsibility gender power relation policy use knowledge gender difference respond practical gender need woman men ngendertransformative policy consist intervention attempt transform existing distribution power resource create balanced relationship among woman men girl boy responding strategic gender need policy target sex together separately intervention may focus woman andor men practical gender need objective creating conducive environment woman men empower themselve", "ProcessedSent": "ngenderspecific policy based understanding existing gendered division resource responsibility gender power relation", "SentID": 222 }, { "ParagraphID": 96, - "Paragraph": "Policies that utilize gender analysis in their formulation and design, and recognize gender differences in terms of needs, interests, priorities, power and roles. They further recognize that both men and women are active development actors for their community. Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \\nGender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs. \\nGender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations. These policies use knowledge of gender difference to respond to the practical gender needs of women or men. \\nGender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs. These policies can target both sexes together, or separately. Interventions may focus on women\u2019s and\/or men\u2019s practical gender needs, but with the objective of creating a conducive environment in which women or men can empower themselve", + "Paragraph": "Policies that utilize gender analysis in their formulation and design, and recognize gender differences in terms of needs, interests, priorities, power and roles. They further recognize that both men and women are active development actors for their community. Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \nGender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs. \nGender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations. These policies use knowledge of gender difference to respond to the practical gender needs of women or men. \nGender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs. These policies can target both sexes together, or separately. Interventions may focus on women\u2019s and\/or men\u2019s practical gender needs, but with the objective of creating a conducive environment in which women or men can empower themselve", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -4033,7 +4033,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 96, - "Paragraph": "Policies that utilize gender analysis in their formulation and design, and recognize gender differences in terms of needs, interests, priorities, power and roles. They further recognize that both men and women are active development actors for their community. Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \\nGender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs. \\nGender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations. These policies use knowledge of gender difference to respond to the practical gender needs of women or men. \\nGender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs. These policies can target both sexes together, or separately. Interventions may focus on women\u2019s and\/or men\u2019s practical gender needs, but with the objective of creating a conducive environment in which women or men can empower themselve", + "Paragraph": "Policies that utilize gender analysis in their formulation and design, and recognize gender differences in terms of needs, interests, priorities, power and roles. They further recognize that both men and women are active development actors for their community. Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \nGender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs. \nGender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations. These policies use knowledge of gender difference to respond to the practical gender needs of women or men. \nGender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs. These policies can target both sexes together, or separately. Interventions may focus on women\u2019s and\/or men\u2019s practical gender needs, but with the objective of creating a conducive environment in which women or men can empower themselve", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -4044,14 +4044,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nGender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs.", + "Sentence": "\nGender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs.", "newParagraph": "policy utilize gender analysis formulation design recognize gender difference term need interest priority power role recognize men woman active development actor community genderaware policy divided following three policy ngenderneutral policy use knowledge gender difference society reduce bias development work order enable woman men meet practical gender need ngenderspecific policy based understanding existing gendered division resource responsibility gender power relation policy use knowledge gender difference respond practical gender need woman men ngendertransformative policy consist intervention attempt transform existing distribution power resource create balanced relationship among woman men girl boy responding strategic gender need policy target sex together separately intervention may focus woman andor men practical gender need objective creating conducive environment woman men empower themselve", "ProcessedSent": "ngendertransformative policy consist intervention attempt transform existing distribution power resource create balanced relationship among woman men girl boy responding strategic gender need", "SentID": 224 }, { "ParagraphID": 96, - "Paragraph": "Policies that utilize gender analysis in their formulation and design, and recognize gender differences in terms of needs, interests, priorities, power and roles. They further recognize that both men and women are active development actors for their community. Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \\nGender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs. \\nGender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations. These policies use knowledge of gender difference to respond to the practical gender needs of women or men. \\nGender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs. These policies can target both sexes together, or separately. Interventions may focus on women\u2019s and\/or men\u2019s practical gender needs, but with the objective of creating a conducive environment in which women or men can empower themselve", + "Paragraph": "Policies that utilize gender analysis in their formulation and design, and recognize gender differences in terms of needs, interests, priorities, power and roles. They further recognize that both men and women are active development actors for their community. Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \nGender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs. \nGender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations. These policies use knowledge of gender difference to respond to the practical gender needs of women or men. \nGender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs. These policies can target both sexes together, or separately. Interventions may focus on women\u2019s and\/or men\u2019s practical gender needs, but with the objective of creating a conducive environment in which women or men can empower themselve", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -4069,7 +4069,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 96, - "Paragraph": "Policies that utilize gender analysis in their formulation and design, and recognize gender differences in terms of needs, interests, priorities, power and roles. They further recognize that both men and women are active development actors for their community. Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \\nGender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs. \\nGender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations. These policies use knowledge of gender difference to respond to the practical gender needs of women or men. \\nGender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs. These policies can target both sexes together, or separately. Interventions may focus on women\u2019s and\/or men\u2019s practical gender needs, but with the objective of creating a conducive environment in which women or men can empower themselve", + "Paragraph": "Policies that utilize gender analysis in their formulation and design, and recognize gender differences in terms of needs, interests, priorities, power and roles. They further recognize that both men and women are active development actors for their community. Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \nGender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs. \nGender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations. These policies use knowledge of gender difference to respond to the practical gender needs of women or men. \nGender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs. These policies can target both sexes together, or separately. Interventions may focus on women\u2019s and\/or men\u2019s practical gender needs, but with the objective of creating a conducive environment in which women or men can empower themselve", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -4429,7 +4429,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 109, - "Paragraph": "Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\nHIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\nSimple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available.", + "Paragraph": "Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \nHIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \nSimple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -4447,7 +4447,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 109, - "Paragraph": "Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\nHIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\nSimple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available.", + "Paragraph": "Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \nHIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \nSimple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -4458,14 +4458,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\nHIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\nSimple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA.", + "Sentence": "There are two main methods of HIV testing: \nHIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \nSimple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA.", "newParagraph": "usually test presence antibody two main method hiv testing nhiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply nsimplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa rapid test usually give result approximately 30 minute easy perform suitable combination three simplerapid test recommended facility elisa elisawestern blot testing available", "ProcessedSent": "two main method hiv testing nhiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply nsimplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa", "SentID": 247 }, { "ParagraphID": 109, - "Paragraph": "Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\nHIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\nSimple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available.", + "Paragraph": "Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \nHIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \nSimple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -4483,7 +4483,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 109, - "Paragraph": "Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\nHIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\nSimple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available.", + "Paragraph": "Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \nHIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \nSimple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -5221,7 +5221,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 132, - "Paragraph": "\u201cA mercenary is any person who:\\n(a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad in order to fight in an armed conflict;\\n(b) Is motivated to take part in the hostilities essentially by the desire for private gain and, in fact, is promised, by or on behalf of a party to the conflict, material compensation substantially in excess of that promised or paid to combatants of similar rank and functions in the armed forces of that party;\\n(c) Is neither a national of a party to the conflict nor a resident of territory controlled by a party to the conflict;\\n(d) Is not a member of the armed forces of a party to the conflict; and \\n(e) Has not been sent by a State which is not a party to the conflict on official duty as a member of its armed forces.\\n\\nA mercenary is also any person who, in any other situation:\\n(a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad for the purpose of participating in a concerted act of violence aimed at:\\n(i) Overthrowing a Government or otherwise undermining the constitutional order of a State; or\\n(ii) Undermining the territorial integrity of a State;\\n(b) Is motivated to take part therein essentially by the desire for significant private gain and is prompted by the promise of payment of material compen\u00adsation;\\n(c) Is neither a national nor a resident of the State against which such an act is directed;\\n(d) Has not been sent by a State on official duty; and\\n(e) Is not a member of the armed forces of the State on whose territory the act is undertaken\u201d (International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, financing and Training of Mercenaries, 1989)", + "Paragraph": "\u201cA mercenary is any person who:\n(a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad in order to fight in an armed conflict;\n(b) Is motivated to take part in the hostilities essentially by the desire for private gain and, in fact, is promised, by or on behalf of a party to the conflict, material compensation substantially in excess of that promised or paid to combatants of similar rank and functions in the armed forces of that party;\n(c) Is neither a national of a party to the conflict nor a resident of territory controlled by a party to the conflict;\n(d) Is not a member of the armed forces of a party to the conflict; and \n(e) Has not been sent by a State which is not a party to the conflict on official duty as a member of its armed forces.\n\nA mercenary is also any person who, in any other situation:\n(a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad for the purpose of participating in a concerted act of violence aimed at:\n(i) Overthrowing a Government or otherwise undermining the constitutional order of a State; or\n(ii) Undermining the territorial integrity of a State;\n(b) Is motivated to take part therein essentially by the desire for significant private gain and is prompted by the promise of payment of material compen\u00adsation;\n(c) Is neither a national nor a resident of the State against which such an act is directed;\n(d) Has not been sent by a State on official duty; and\n(e) Is not a member of the armed forces of the State on whose territory the act is undertaken\u201d (International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, financing and Training of Mercenaries, 1989)", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -5232,7 +5232,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\u201cA mercenary is any person who:\\n(a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad in order to fight in an armed conflict;\\n(b) Is motivated to take part in the hostilities essentially by the desire for private gain and, in fact, is promised, by or on behalf of a party to the conflict, material compensation substantially in excess of that promised or paid to combatants of similar rank and functions in the armed forces of that party;\\n(c) Is neither a national of a party to the conflict nor a resident of territory controlled by a party to the conflict;\\n(d) Is not a member of the armed forces of a party to the conflict; and \\n(e) Has not been sent by a State which is not a party to the conflict on official duty as a member of its armed forces.\\n\\nA mercenary is also any person who, in any other situation:\\n(a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad for the purpose of participating in a concerted act of violence aimed at:\\n(i) Overthrowing a Government or otherwise undermining the constitutional order of a State; or\\n(ii) Undermining the territorial integrity of a State;\\n(b) Is motivated to take part therein essentially by the desire for significant private gain and is prompted by the promise of payment of material compen\u00adsation;\\n(c) Is neither a national nor a resident of the State against which such an act is directed;\\n(d) Has not been sent by a State on official duty; and\\n(e) Is not a member of the armed forces of the State on whose territory the act is undertaken\u201d (International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, financing and Training of Mercenaries, 1989)", + "Sentence": "\u201cA mercenary is any person who:\n(a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad in order to fight in an armed conflict;\n(b) Is motivated to take part in the hostilities essentially by the desire for private gain and, in fact, is promised, by or on behalf of a party to the conflict, material compensation substantially in excess of that promised or paid to combatants of similar rank and functions in the armed forces of that party;\n(c) Is neither a national of a party to the conflict nor a resident of territory controlled by a party to the conflict;\n(d) Is not a member of the armed forces of a party to the conflict; and \n(e) Has not been sent by a State which is not a party to the conflict on official duty as a member of its armed forces.\n\nA mercenary is also any person who, in any other situation:\n(a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad for the purpose of participating in a concerted act of violence aimed at:\n(i) Overthrowing a Government or otherwise undermining the constitutional order of a State; or\n(ii) Undermining the territorial integrity of a State;\n(b) Is motivated to take part therein essentially by the desire for significant private gain and is prompted by the promise of payment of material compen\u00adsation;\n(c) Is neither a national nor a resident of the State against which such an act is directed;\n(d) Has not been sent by a State on official duty; and\n(e) Is not a member of the armed forces of the State on whose territory the act is undertaken\u201d (International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, financing and Training of Mercenaries, 1989)", "newParagraph": " mercenary person whona specially recruited locally abroad order fight armed conflictnb motivated take part hostility essentially desire private gain fact promised behalf party conflict material compensation substantially excess promised paid combatant similar rank function armed force partync neither national party conflict resident territory controlled party conflictnd member armed force party conflict ne sent state party conflict official duty member armed forcesnna mercenary also person situationna specially recruited locally abroad purpose participating concerted act violence aimed atni overthrowing government otherwise undermining constitutional order state ornii undermining territorial integrity statenb motivated take part therein essentially desire significant private gain prompted promise payment material compen sationnc neither national resident state act directednd sent state official duty andne member armed force state whose territory act undertaken international convention recruitment use financing training mercenary 1989", "ProcessedSent": " mercenary person whona specially recruited locally abroad order fight armed conflictnb motivated take part hostility essentially desire private gain fact promised behalf party conflict material compensation substantially excess promised paid combatant similar rank function armed force partync neither national party conflict resident territory controlled party conflictnd member armed force party conflict ne sent state party conflict official duty member armed forcesnna mercenary also person situationna specially recruited locally abroad purpose participating concerted act violence aimed atni overthrowing government otherwise undermining constitutional order state ornii undermining territorial integrity statenb motivated take part therein essentially desire significant private gain prompted promise payment material compen sationnc neither national resident state act directednd sent state official duty andne member armed force state whose territory act undertaken international convention recruitment use financing training mercenary 1989", "SentID": 290 @@ -5275,7 +5275,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 134, - "Paragraph": "The Millennium Development Goals summarize the development goals agreedon at international conferences and world summits during the 1990s. At the end of the decade, world leaders distilled the key goals and targets in the millennium Declaration (September 2000).the Millennium Development Goals, to be achieved between 1990 and 2015, include:\\nhalving extreme poverty and hunger;\\nachieving universal primary education;\\npromoting gender equality; \\nreducing under-five mortality by two-thirds;\\nreducing maternal mortality by three-quarters;\\nreversing the spread of HIV\/AIDS, malaria and TB; \\nensuring environmental sustainability; \\ndeveloping a global partnership for development, with targets for aid, \\ntrade and debt relief.", + "Paragraph": "The Millennium Development Goals summarize the development goals agreedon at international conferences and world summits during the 1990s. At the end of the decade, world leaders distilled the key goals and targets in the millennium Declaration (September 2000).the Millennium Development Goals, to be achieved between 1990 and 2015, include:\nhalving extreme poverty and hunger;\nachieving universal primary education;\npromoting gender equality; \nreducing under-five mortality by two-thirds;\nreducing maternal mortality by three-quarters;\nreversing the spread of HIV\/AIDS, malaria and TB; \nensuring environmental sustainability; \ndeveloping a global partnership for development, with targets for aid, \ntrade and debt relief.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -5293,7 +5293,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 134, - "Paragraph": "The Millennium Development Goals summarize the development goals agreedon at international conferences and world summits during the 1990s. At the end of the decade, world leaders distilled the key goals and targets in the millennium Declaration (September 2000).the Millennium Development Goals, to be achieved between 1990 and 2015, include:\\nhalving extreme poverty and hunger;\\nachieving universal primary education;\\npromoting gender equality; \\nreducing under-five mortality by two-thirds;\\nreducing maternal mortality by three-quarters;\\nreversing the spread of HIV\/AIDS, malaria and TB; \\nensuring environmental sustainability; \\ndeveloping a global partnership for development, with targets for aid, \\ntrade and debt relief.", + "Paragraph": "The Millennium Development Goals summarize the development goals agreedon at international conferences and world summits during the 1990s. At the end of the decade, world leaders distilled the key goals and targets in the millennium Declaration (September 2000).the Millennium Development Goals, to be achieved between 1990 and 2015, include:\nhalving extreme poverty and hunger;\nachieving universal primary education;\npromoting gender equality; \nreducing under-five mortality by two-thirds;\nreducing maternal mortality by three-quarters;\nreversing the spread of HIV\/AIDS, malaria and TB; \nensuring environmental sustainability; \ndeveloping a global partnership for development, with targets for aid, \ntrade and debt relief.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -5304,7 +5304,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "At the end of the decade, world leaders distilled the key goals and targets in the millennium Declaration (September 2000).the Millennium Development Goals, to be achieved between 1990 and 2015, include:\\nhalving extreme poverty and hunger;\\nachieving universal primary education;\\npromoting gender equality; \\nreducing under-five mortality by two-thirds;\\nreducing maternal mortality by three-quarters;\\nreversing the spread of HIV\/AIDS, malaria and TB; \\nensuring environmental sustainability; \\ndeveloping a global partnership for development, with targets for aid, \\ntrade and debt relief.", + "Sentence": "At the end of the decade, world leaders distilled the key goals and targets in the millennium Declaration (September 2000).the Millennium Development Goals, to be achieved between 1990 and 2015, include:\nhalving extreme poverty and hunger;\nachieving universal primary education;\npromoting gender equality; \nreducing under-five mortality by two-thirds;\nreducing maternal mortality by three-quarters;\nreversing the spread of HIV\/AIDS, malaria and TB; \nensuring environmental sustainability; \ndeveloping a global partnership for development, with targets for aid, \ntrade and debt relief.", "newParagraph": "millennium development goal summarize development goal agreedon international conference world summit 1990s end decade world leader distilled key goal target millennium declaration september 2000the millennium development goal achieved 1990 2015 includenhalving extreme poverty hungernachieving universal primary educationnpromoting gender equality nreducing underfive mortality twothirdsnreducing maternal mortality threequartersnreversing spread hivaids malaria tb nensuring environmental sustainability ndeveloping global partnership development target aid ntrade debt relief", "ProcessedSent": "end decade world leader distilled key goal target millennium declaration september 2000the millennium development goal achieved 1990 2015 includenhalving extreme poverty hungernachieving universal primary educationnpromoting gender equality nreducing underfive mortality twothirdsnreducing maternal mortality threequartersnreversing spread hivaids malaria tb nensuring environmental sustainability ndeveloping global partnership development target aid ntrade debt relief", "SentID": 294 @@ -5725,7 +5725,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 149, - "Paragraph": "A set of statements that define the purpose and goals of an organization and the rules, standards and principles of action that govern the way in which the organization aims to achieve these goals. \\nPolicy evolves in response to strategic direction and field experience. in turn, it influences the way in which plans are developed, and how resources are mobilized and applied. Policy is prescriptive and compliance is assumed, or at least is encouraged.", + "Paragraph": "A set of statements that define the purpose and goals of an organization and the rules, standards and principles of action that govern the way in which the organization aims to achieve these goals. \nPolicy evolves in response to strategic direction and field experience. in turn, it influences the way in which plans are developed, and how resources are mobilized and applied. Policy is prescriptive and compliance is assumed, or at least is encouraged.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -5743,7 +5743,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 149, - "Paragraph": "A set of statements that define the purpose and goals of an organization and the rules, standards and principles of action that govern the way in which the organization aims to achieve these goals. \\nPolicy evolves in response to strategic direction and field experience. in turn, it influences the way in which plans are developed, and how resources are mobilized and applied. Policy is prescriptive and compliance is assumed, or at least is encouraged.", + "Paragraph": "A set of statements that define the purpose and goals of an organization and the rules, standards and principles of action that govern the way in which the organization aims to achieve these goals. \nPolicy evolves in response to strategic direction and field experience. in turn, it influences the way in which plans are developed, and how resources are mobilized and applied. Policy is prescriptive and compliance is assumed, or at least is encouraged.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -5754,14 +5754,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nPolicy evolves in response to strategic direction and field experience.", + "Sentence": "\nPolicy evolves in response to strategic direction and field experience.", "newParagraph": "set statement define purpose goal organization rule standard principle action govern way organization aim achieve goal npolicy evolves response strategic direction field experience turn influence way plan developed resource mobilized applied policy prescriptive compliance assumed least encouraged", "ProcessedSent": "npolicy evolves response strategic direction field experience", "SentID": 319 }, { "ParagraphID": 149, - "Paragraph": "A set of statements that define the purpose and goals of an organization and the rules, standards and principles of action that govern the way in which the organization aims to achieve these goals. \\nPolicy evolves in response to strategic direction and field experience. in turn, it influences the way in which plans are developed, and how resources are mobilized and applied. Policy is prescriptive and compliance is assumed, or at least is encouraged.", + "Paragraph": "A set of statements that define the purpose and goals of an organization and the rules, standards and principles of action that govern the way in which the organization aims to achieve these goals. \nPolicy evolves in response to strategic direction and field experience. in turn, it influences the way in which plans are developed, and how resources are mobilized and applied. Policy is prescriptive and compliance is assumed, or at least is encouraged.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -5779,7 +5779,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 149, - "Paragraph": "A set of statements that define the purpose and goals of an organization and the rules, standards and principles of action that govern the way in which the organization aims to achieve these goals. \\nPolicy evolves in response to strategic direction and field experience. in turn, it influences the way in which plans are developed, and how resources are mobilized and applied. Policy is prescriptive and compliance is assumed, or at least is encouraged.", + "Paragraph": "A set of statements that define the purpose and goals of an organization and the rules, standards and principles of action that govern the way in which the organization aims to achieve these goals. \nPolicy evolves in response to strategic direction and field experience. in turn, it influences the way in which plans are developed, and how resources are mobilized and applied. Policy is prescriptive and compliance is assumed, or at least is encouraged.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -6391,7 +6391,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 164, - "Paragraph": "Quick-impact projects are small, rapidly implemented projects intended to: \\nhelp create conditions for durable solutions for refugees and returnees through rapid interventions; \\nthrough community participation, provide for small-scale initial rehabilitation and enable communities to take advantage of development opportunities; \\nhelp strengthen the absorptive capacity of target areas, while meeting urgent community needs (UNHCR, Quick Impact Projects (QIPs): A Provisional Guide, Geneva, May 2004).", + "Paragraph": "Quick-impact projects are small, rapidly implemented projects intended to: \nhelp create conditions for durable solutions for refugees and returnees through rapid interventions; \nthrough community participation, provide for small-scale initial rehabilitation and enable communities to take advantage of development opportunities; \nhelp strengthen the absorptive capacity of target areas, while meeting urgent community needs (UNHCR, Quick Impact Projects (QIPs): A Provisional Guide, Geneva, May 2004).", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -6402,7 +6402,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Quick-impact projects are small, rapidly implemented projects intended to: \\nhelp create conditions for durable solutions for refugees and returnees through rapid interventions; \\nthrough community participation, provide for small-scale initial rehabilitation and enable communities to take advantage of development opportunities; \\nhelp strengthen the absorptive capacity of target areas, while meeting urgent community needs (UNHCR, Quick Impact Projects (QIPs): A Provisional Guide, Geneva, May 2004).", + "Sentence": "Quick-impact projects are small, rapidly implemented projects intended to: \nhelp create conditions for durable solutions for refugees and returnees through rapid interventions; \nthrough community participation, provide for small-scale initial rehabilitation and enable communities to take advantage of development opportunities; \nhelp strengthen the absorptive capacity of target areas, while meeting urgent community needs (UNHCR, Quick Impact Projects (QIPs): A Provisional Guide, Geneva, May 2004).", "newParagraph": "quickimpact project small rapidly implemented project intended nhelp create condition durable solution refugee returnees rapid intervention nthrough community participation provide smallscale initial rehabilitation enable community take advantage development opportunity nhelp strengthen absorptive capacity target area meeting urgent community need unhcr quick impact project qips provisional guide geneva may 2004", "ProcessedSent": "quickimpact project small rapidly implemented project intended nhelp create condition durable solution refugee returnees rapid intervention nthrough community participation provide smallscale initial rehabilitation enable community take advantage development opportunity nhelp strengthen absorptive capacity target area meeting urgent community need unhcr quick impact project qips provisional guide geneva may 2004", "SentID": 355 @@ -6553,7 +6553,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 170, - "Paragraph": "Defined in the 1951 UN Convention relating to the Status of Refugees as a person who: \\n\u201cIs outside the country of origin; \\nHas a well-founded fear of persecution because of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion; and \\nIs unable or unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country, or to return there, for fear of persecution.\u201d \\nIn Africa and Latin America, this definition has been extended. The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa also includes as refugees persons fleeing civil disturbances, widespread violence and war. In Latin America, the Cartagena Declaration of 1984, although not binding, recommends that the definition should also include persons who fled their country \u201cbecause their lives, safety or freedom have been threatened by generalised violence, foreign aggression, internal conflicts, massive violations of human rights or other circumstances which have seriously disturbed public order\u201d.", + "Paragraph": "Defined in the 1951 UN Convention relating to the Status of Refugees as a person who: \n\u201cIs outside the country of origin; \nHas a well-founded fear of persecution because of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion; and \nIs unable or unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country, or to return there, for fear of persecution.\u201d \nIn Africa and Latin America, this definition has been extended. The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa also includes as refugees persons fleeing civil disturbances, widespread violence and war. In Latin America, the Cartagena Declaration of 1984, although not binding, recommends that the definition should also include persons who fled their country \u201cbecause their lives, safety or freedom have been threatened by generalised violence, foreign aggression, internal conflicts, massive violations of human rights or other circumstances which have seriously disturbed public order\u201d.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -6564,14 +6564,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Defined in the 1951 UN Convention relating to the Status of Refugees as a person who: \\n\u201cIs outside the country of origin; \\nHas a well-founded fear of persecution because of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion; and \\nIs unable or unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country, or to return there, for fear of persecution.\u201d \\nIn Africa and Latin America, this definition has been extended.", + "Sentence": "Defined in the 1951 UN Convention relating to the Status of Refugees as a person who: \n\u201cIs outside the country of origin; \nHas a well-founded fear of persecution because of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion; and \nIs unable or unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country, or to return there, for fear of persecution.\u201d \nIn Africa and Latin America, this definition has been extended.", "newParagraph": "defined 1951 un convention relating status refugee person n outside country origin nhas wellfounded fear persecution race religion nationality membership particular social group political opinion ni unable unwilling avail protection country return fear persecution nin africa latin america definition extended 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa also includes refugee person fleeing civil disturbance widespread violence war latin america cartagena declaration 1984 although binding recommends definition also include person fled country life safety freedom threatened generalised violence foreign aggression internal conflict massive violation human right circumstance seriously disturbed public order ", "ProcessedSent": "defined 1951 un convention relating status refugee person n outside country origin nhas wellfounded fear persecution race religion nationality membership particular social group political opinion ni unable unwilling avail protection country return fear persecution nin africa latin america definition extended", "SentID": 364 }, { "ParagraphID": 170, - "Paragraph": "Defined in the 1951 UN Convention relating to the Status of Refugees as a person who: \\n\u201cIs outside the country of origin; \\nHas a well-founded fear of persecution because of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion; and \\nIs unable or unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country, or to return there, for fear of persecution.\u201d \\nIn Africa and Latin America, this definition has been extended. The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa also includes as refugees persons fleeing civil disturbances, widespread violence and war. In Latin America, the Cartagena Declaration of 1984, although not binding, recommends that the definition should also include persons who fled their country \u201cbecause their lives, safety or freedom have been threatened by generalised violence, foreign aggression, internal conflicts, massive violations of human rights or other circumstances which have seriously disturbed public order\u201d.", + "Paragraph": "Defined in the 1951 UN Convention relating to the Status of Refugees as a person who: \n\u201cIs outside the country of origin; \nHas a well-founded fear of persecution because of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion; and \nIs unable or unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country, or to return there, for fear of persecution.\u201d \nIn Africa and Latin America, this definition has been extended. The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa also includes as refugees persons fleeing civil disturbances, widespread violence and war. In Latin America, the Cartagena Declaration of 1984, although not binding, recommends that the definition should also include persons who fled their country \u201cbecause their lives, safety or freedom have been threatened by generalised violence, foreign aggression, internal conflicts, massive violations of human rights or other circumstances which have seriously disturbed public order\u201d.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -6589,7 +6589,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 170, - "Paragraph": "Defined in the 1951 UN Convention relating to the Status of Refugees as a person who: \\n\u201cIs outside the country of origin; \\nHas a well-founded fear of persecution because of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion; and \\nIs unable or unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country, or to return there, for fear of persecution.\u201d \\nIn Africa and Latin America, this definition has been extended. The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa also includes as refugees persons fleeing civil disturbances, widespread violence and war. In Latin America, the Cartagena Declaration of 1984, although not binding, recommends that the definition should also include persons who fled their country \u201cbecause their lives, safety or freedom have been threatened by generalised violence, foreign aggression, internal conflicts, massive violations of human rights or other circumstances which have seriously disturbed public order\u201d.", + "Paragraph": "Defined in the 1951 UN Convention relating to the Status of Refugees as a person who: \n\u201cIs outside the country of origin; \nHas a well-founded fear of persecution because of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion; and \nIs unable or unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country, or to return there, for fear of persecution.\u201d \nIn Africa and Latin America, this definition has been extended. The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa also includes as refugees persons fleeing civil disturbances, widespread violence and war. In Latin America, the Cartagena Declaration of 1984, although not binding, recommends that the definition should also include persons who fled their country \u201cbecause their lives, safety or freedom have been threatened by generalised violence, foreign aggression, internal conflicts, massive violations of human rights or other circumstances which have seriously disturbed public order\u201d.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -7435,7 +7435,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 194, - "Paragraph": "A process that encourages the adoption of safer behaviours by at-risk groups and by SALW holders, and which provides the links among affected communities, other SALW components and other sectors. SALW risk education can be implemented as a stand-alone activity, in contexts where no weapons collection is taking place. If an amnesty is to be set up at a later stage, risk education activities will permit an information campaign to take place efficiently, using the networks, systems and methods in place as part of the risk education programme and adapting the content accordingly. \\nSALW risk education is an essential component of SALW control. There are two related and mutually reinforcing components: (1) community involvement; and (2) public education. \\nGenerally, SALW risk education programmes can use both approaches, as they reinforce each other. They are not, however, alternatives to each other, nor are they alternatives to eradicating the SALW threat by weapons collection and destruction. The use of those approaches will also depend on whether a weapons collection programme is taking place or not.", + "Paragraph": "A process that encourages the adoption of safer behaviours by at-risk groups and by SALW holders, and which provides the links among affected communities, other SALW components and other sectors. SALW risk education can be implemented as a stand-alone activity, in contexts where no weapons collection is taking place. If an amnesty is to be set up at a later stage, risk education activities will permit an information campaign to take place efficiently, using the networks, systems and methods in place as part of the risk education programme and adapting the content accordingly. \nSALW risk education is an essential component of SALW control. There are two related and mutually reinforcing components: (1) community involvement; and (2) public education. \nGenerally, SALW risk education programmes can use both approaches, as they reinforce each other. They are not, however, alternatives to each other, nor are they alternatives to eradicating the SALW threat by weapons collection and destruction. The use of those approaches will also depend on whether a weapons collection programme is taking place or not.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -7453,7 +7453,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 194, - "Paragraph": "A process that encourages the adoption of safer behaviours by at-risk groups and by SALW holders, and which provides the links among affected communities, other SALW components and other sectors. SALW risk education can be implemented as a stand-alone activity, in contexts where no weapons collection is taking place. If an amnesty is to be set up at a later stage, risk education activities will permit an information campaign to take place efficiently, using the networks, systems and methods in place as part of the risk education programme and adapting the content accordingly. \\nSALW risk education is an essential component of SALW control. There are two related and mutually reinforcing components: (1) community involvement; and (2) public education. \\nGenerally, SALW risk education programmes can use both approaches, as they reinforce each other. They are not, however, alternatives to each other, nor are they alternatives to eradicating the SALW threat by weapons collection and destruction. The use of those approaches will also depend on whether a weapons collection programme is taking place or not.", + "Paragraph": "A process that encourages the adoption of safer behaviours by at-risk groups and by SALW holders, and which provides the links among affected communities, other SALW components and other sectors. SALW risk education can be implemented as a stand-alone activity, in contexts where no weapons collection is taking place. If an amnesty is to be set up at a later stage, risk education activities will permit an information campaign to take place efficiently, using the networks, systems and methods in place as part of the risk education programme and adapting the content accordingly. \nSALW risk education is an essential component of SALW control. There are two related and mutually reinforcing components: (1) community involvement; and (2) public education. \nGenerally, SALW risk education programmes can use both approaches, as they reinforce each other. They are not, however, alternatives to each other, nor are they alternatives to eradicating the SALW threat by weapons collection and destruction. The use of those approaches will also depend on whether a weapons collection programme is taking place or not.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -7471,7 +7471,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 194, - "Paragraph": "A process that encourages the adoption of safer behaviours by at-risk groups and by SALW holders, and which provides the links among affected communities, other SALW components and other sectors. SALW risk education can be implemented as a stand-alone activity, in contexts where no weapons collection is taking place. If an amnesty is to be set up at a later stage, risk education activities will permit an information campaign to take place efficiently, using the networks, systems and methods in place as part of the risk education programme and adapting the content accordingly. \\nSALW risk education is an essential component of SALW control. There are two related and mutually reinforcing components: (1) community involvement; and (2) public education. \\nGenerally, SALW risk education programmes can use both approaches, as they reinforce each other. They are not, however, alternatives to each other, nor are they alternatives to eradicating the SALW threat by weapons collection and destruction. The use of those approaches will also depend on whether a weapons collection programme is taking place or not.", + "Paragraph": "A process that encourages the adoption of safer behaviours by at-risk groups and by SALW holders, and which provides the links among affected communities, other SALW components and other sectors. SALW risk education can be implemented as a stand-alone activity, in contexts where no weapons collection is taking place. If an amnesty is to be set up at a later stage, risk education activities will permit an information campaign to take place efficiently, using the networks, systems and methods in place as part of the risk education programme and adapting the content accordingly. \nSALW risk education is an essential component of SALW control. There are two related and mutually reinforcing components: (1) community involvement; and (2) public education. \nGenerally, SALW risk education programmes can use both approaches, as they reinforce each other. They are not, however, alternatives to each other, nor are they alternatives to eradicating the SALW threat by weapons collection and destruction. The use of those approaches will also depend on whether a weapons collection programme is taking place or not.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -7489,7 +7489,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 194, - "Paragraph": "A process that encourages the adoption of safer behaviours by at-risk groups and by SALW holders, and which provides the links among affected communities, other SALW components and other sectors. SALW risk education can be implemented as a stand-alone activity, in contexts where no weapons collection is taking place. If an amnesty is to be set up at a later stage, risk education activities will permit an information campaign to take place efficiently, using the networks, systems and methods in place as part of the risk education programme and adapting the content accordingly. \\nSALW risk education is an essential component of SALW control. There are two related and mutually reinforcing components: (1) community involvement; and (2) public education. \\nGenerally, SALW risk education programmes can use both approaches, as they reinforce each other. They are not, however, alternatives to each other, nor are they alternatives to eradicating the SALW threat by weapons collection and destruction. The use of those approaches will also depend on whether a weapons collection programme is taking place or not.", + "Paragraph": "A process that encourages the adoption of safer behaviours by at-risk groups and by SALW holders, and which provides the links among affected communities, other SALW components and other sectors. SALW risk education can be implemented as a stand-alone activity, in contexts where no weapons collection is taking place. If an amnesty is to be set up at a later stage, risk education activities will permit an information campaign to take place efficiently, using the networks, systems and methods in place as part of the risk education programme and adapting the content accordingly. \nSALW risk education is an essential component of SALW control. There are two related and mutually reinforcing components: (1) community involvement; and (2) public education. \nGenerally, SALW risk education programmes can use both approaches, as they reinforce each other. They are not, however, alternatives to each other, nor are they alternatives to eradicating the SALW threat by weapons collection and destruction. The use of those approaches will also depend on whether a weapons collection programme is taking place or not.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -7500,14 +7500,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nSALW risk education is an essential component of SALW control.", + "Sentence": "\nSALW risk education is an essential component of SALW control.", "newParagraph": "process encourages adoption safer behaviour atrisk group salw holder provides link among affected community salw component sector salw risk education implemented standalone activity context weapon collection taking place amnesty set later stage risk education activity permit information campaign take place efficiently using network system method place part risk education programme adapting content accordingly nsalw risk education essential component salw control two related mutually reinforcing component 1 community involvement 2 public education ngenerally salw risk education programme use approach reinforce however alternative alternative eradicating salw threat weapon collection destruction use approach also depend whether weapon collection programme taking place", "ProcessedSent": "nsalw risk education essential component salw control", "SentID": 416 }, { "ParagraphID": 194, - "Paragraph": "A process that encourages the adoption of safer behaviours by at-risk groups and by SALW holders, and which provides the links among affected communities, other SALW components and other sectors. SALW risk education can be implemented as a stand-alone activity, in contexts where no weapons collection is taking place. If an amnesty is to be set up at a later stage, risk education activities will permit an information campaign to take place efficiently, using the networks, systems and methods in place as part of the risk education programme and adapting the content accordingly. \\nSALW risk education is an essential component of SALW control. There are two related and mutually reinforcing components: (1) community involvement; and (2) public education. \\nGenerally, SALW risk education programmes can use both approaches, as they reinforce each other. They are not, however, alternatives to each other, nor are they alternatives to eradicating the SALW threat by weapons collection and destruction. The use of those approaches will also depend on whether a weapons collection programme is taking place or not.", + "Paragraph": "A process that encourages the adoption of safer behaviours by at-risk groups and by SALW holders, and which provides the links among affected communities, other SALW components and other sectors. SALW risk education can be implemented as a stand-alone activity, in contexts where no weapons collection is taking place. If an amnesty is to be set up at a later stage, risk education activities will permit an information campaign to take place efficiently, using the networks, systems and methods in place as part of the risk education programme and adapting the content accordingly. \nSALW risk education is an essential component of SALW control. There are two related and mutually reinforcing components: (1) community involvement; and (2) public education. \nGenerally, SALW risk education programmes can use both approaches, as they reinforce each other. They are not, however, alternatives to each other, nor are they alternatives to eradicating the SALW threat by weapons collection and destruction. The use of those approaches will also depend on whether a weapons collection programme is taking place or not.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -7525,7 +7525,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 194, - "Paragraph": "A process that encourages the adoption of safer behaviours by at-risk groups and by SALW holders, and which provides the links among affected communities, other SALW components and other sectors. SALW risk education can be implemented as a stand-alone activity, in contexts where no weapons collection is taking place. If an amnesty is to be set up at a later stage, risk education activities will permit an information campaign to take place efficiently, using the networks, systems and methods in place as part of the risk education programme and adapting the content accordingly. \\nSALW risk education is an essential component of SALW control. There are two related and mutually reinforcing components: (1) community involvement; and (2) public education. \\nGenerally, SALW risk education programmes can use both approaches, as they reinforce each other. They are not, however, alternatives to each other, nor are they alternatives to eradicating the SALW threat by weapons collection and destruction. The use of those approaches will also depend on whether a weapons collection programme is taking place or not.", + "Paragraph": "A process that encourages the adoption of safer behaviours by at-risk groups and by SALW holders, and which provides the links among affected communities, other SALW components and other sectors. SALW risk education can be implemented as a stand-alone activity, in contexts where no weapons collection is taking place. If an amnesty is to be set up at a later stage, risk education activities will permit an information campaign to take place efficiently, using the networks, systems and methods in place as part of the risk education programme and adapting the content accordingly. \nSALW risk education is an essential component of SALW control. There are two related and mutually reinforcing components: (1) community involvement; and (2) public education. \nGenerally, SALW risk education programmes can use both approaches, as they reinforce each other. They are not, however, alternatives to each other, nor are they alternatives to eradicating the SALW threat by weapons collection and destruction. The use of those approaches will also depend on whether a weapons collection programme is taking place or not.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -7536,14 +7536,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nGenerally, SALW risk education programmes can use both approaches, as they reinforce each other.", + "Sentence": "\nGenerally, SALW risk education programmes can use both approaches, as they reinforce each other.", "newParagraph": "process encourages adoption safer behaviour atrisk group salw holder provides link among affected community salw component sector salw risk education implemented standalone activity context weapon collection taking place amnesty set later stage risk education activity permit information campaign take place efficiently using network system method place part risk education programme adapting content accordingly nsalw risk education essential component salw control two related mutually reinforcing component 1 community involvement 2 public education ngenerally salw risk education programme use approach reinforce however alternative alternative eradicating salw threat weapon collection destruction use approach also depend whether weapon collection programme taking place", "ProcessedSent": "ngenerally salw risk education programme use approach reinforce", "SentID": 418 }, { "ParagraphID": 194, - "Paragraph": "A process that encourages the adoption of safer behaviours by at-risk groups and by SALW holders, and which provides the links among affected communities, other SALW components and other sectors. SALW risk education can be implemented as a stand-alone activity, in contexts where no weapons collection is taking place. If an amnesty is to be set up at a later stage, risk education activities will permit an information campaign to take place efficiently, using the networks, systems and methods in place as part of the risk education programme and adapting the content accordingly. \\nSALW risk education is an essential component of SALW control. There are two related and mutually reinforcing components: (1) community involvement; and (2) public education. \\nGenerally, SALW risk education programmes can use both approaches, as they reinforce each other. They are not, however, alternatives to each other, nor are they alternatives to eradicating the SALW threat by weapons collection and destruction. The use of those approaches will also depend on whether a weapons collection programme is taking place or not.", + "Paragraph": "A process that encourages the adoption of safer behaviours by at-risk groups and by SALW holders, and which provides the links among affected communities, other SALW components and other sectors. SALW risk education can be implemented as a stand-alone activity, in contexts where no weapons collection is taking place. If an amnesty is to be set up at a later stage, risk education activities will permit an information campaign to take place efficiently, using the networks, systems and methods in place as part of the risk education programme and adapting the content accordingly. \nSALW risk education is an essential component of SALW control. There are two related and mutually reinforcing components: (1) community involvement; and (2) public education. \nGenerally, SALW risk education programmes can use both approaches, as they reinforce each other. They are not, however, alternatives to each other, nor are they alternatives to eradicating the SALW threat by weapons collection and destruction. The use of those approaches will also depend on whether a weapons collection programme is taking place or not.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -7561,7 +7561,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 194, - "Paragraph": "A process that encourages the adoption of safer behaviours by at-risk groups and by SALW holders, and which provides the links among affected communities, other SALW components and other sectors. SALW risk education can be implemented as a stand-alone activity, in contexts where no weapons collection is taking place. If an amnesty is to be set up at a later stage, risk education activities will permit an information campaign to take place efficiently, using the networks, systems and methods in place as part of the risk education programme and adapting the content accordingly. \\nSALW risk education is an essential component of SALW control. There are two related and mutually reinforcing components: (1) community involvement; and (2) public education. \\nGenerally, SALW risk education programmes can use both approaches, as they reinforce each other. They are not, however, alternatives to each other, nor are they alternatives to eradicating the SALW threat by weapons collection and destruction. The use of those approaches will also depend on whether a weapons collection programme is taking place or not.", + "Paragraph": "A process that encourages the adoption of safer behaviours by at-risk groups and by SALW holders, and which provides the links among affected communities, other SALW components and other sectors. SALW risk education can be implemented as a stand-alone activity, in contexts where no weapons collection is taking place. If an amnesty is to be set up at a later stage, risk education activities will permit an information campaign to take place efficiently, using the networks, systems and methods in place as part of the risk education programme and adapting the content accordingly. \nSALW risk education is an essential component of SALW control. There are two related and mutually reinforcing components: (1) community involvement; and (2) public education. \nGenerally, SALW risk education programmes can use both approaches, as they reinforce each other. They are not, however, alternatives to each other, nor are they alternatives to eradicating the SALW threat by weapons collection and destruction. The use of those approaches will also depend on whether a weapons collection programme is taking place or not.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -8569,7 +8569,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 225, - "Paragraph": "Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmission of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\nUse of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recommended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equipment is not available. \\nDiscard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\nDocument the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percutaneous procedures. \\nWash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\nDisinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\nHandle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as possible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water.", + "Paragraph": "Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmission of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \nUse of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recommended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equipment is not available. \nDiscard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \nDocument the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percutaneous procedures. \nWash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \nDisinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \nHandle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as possible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -8587,7 +8587,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 225, - "Paragraph": "Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmission of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\nUse of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recommended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equipment is not available. \\nDiscard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\nDocument the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percutaneous procedures. \\nWash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\nDisinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\nHandle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as possible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water.", + "Paragraph": "Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmission of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \nUse of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recommended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equipment is not available. \nDiscard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \nDocument the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percutaneous procedures. \nWash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \nDisinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \nHandle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as possible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -8605,7 +8605,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 225, - "Paragraph": "Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmission of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\nUse of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recommended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equipment is not available. \\nDiscard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\nDocument the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percutaneous procedures. \\nWash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\nDisinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\nHandle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as possible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water.", + "Paragraph": "Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmission of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \nUse of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recommended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equipment is not available. \nDiscard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \nDocument the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percutaneous procedures. \nWash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \nDisinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \nHandle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as possible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -8616,14 +8616,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nUse of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recommended.", + "Sentence": "\nUse of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recommended.", "newParagraph": "simple infection control measure reduce risk transmission blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person nuse new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recommended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equipment available ndiscard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full ndocument quality sterilization medical equipment used percutaneous procedure nwash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid ndisinfect instrument contaminated equipment nhandle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little possible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water", "ProcessedSent": "nuse new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recommended", "SentID": 478 }, { "ParagraphID": 225, - "Paragraph": "Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmission of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\nUse of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recommended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equipment is not available. \\nDiscard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\nDocument the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percutaneous procedures. \\nWash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\nDisinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\nHandle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as possible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water.", + "Paragraph": "Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmission of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \nUse of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recommended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equipment is not available. \nDiscard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \nDocument the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percutaneous procedures. \nWash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \nDisinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \nHandle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as possible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -8641,7 +8641,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 225, - "Paragraph": "Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmission of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\nUse of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recommended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equipment is not available. \\nDiscard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\nDocument the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percutaneous procedures. \\nWash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\nDisinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\nHandle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as possible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water.", + "Paragraph": "Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmission of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \nUse of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recommended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equipment is not available. \nDiscard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \nDocument the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percutaneous procedures. \nWash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \nDisinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \nHandle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as possible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -8652,14 +8652,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nDiscard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full.", + "Sentence": "\nDiscard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full.", "newParagraph": "simple infection control measure reduce risk transmission blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person nuse new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recommended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equipment available ndiscard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full ndocument quality sterilization medical equipment used percutaneous procedure nwash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid ndisinfect instrument contaminated equipment nhandle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little possible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water", "ProcessedSent": "ndiscard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full", "SentID": 480 }, { "ParagraphID": 225, - "Paragraph": "Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmission of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\nUse of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recommended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equipment is not available. \\nDiscard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\nDocument the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percutaneous procedures. \\nWash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\nDisinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\nHandle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as possible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water.", + "Paragraph": "Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmission of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \nUse of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recommended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equipment is not available. \nDiscard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \nDocument the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percutaneous procedures. \nWash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \nDisinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \nHandle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as possible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -8670,14 +8670,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nDocument the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percutaneous procedures.", + "Sentence": "\nDocument the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percutaneous procedures.", "newParagraph": "simple infection control measure reduce risk transmission blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person nuse new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recommended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equipment available ndiscard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full ndocument quality sterilization medical equipment used percutaneous procedure nwash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid ndisinfect instrument contaminated equipment nhandle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little possible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water", "ProcessedSent": "ndocument quality sterilization medical equipment used percutaneous procedure", "SentID": 481 }, { "ParagraphID": 225, - "Paragraph": "Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmission of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\nUse of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recommended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equipment is not available. \\nDiscard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\nDocument the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percutaneous procedures. \\nWash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\nDisinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\nHandle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as possible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water.", + "Paragraph": "Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmission of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \nUse of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recommended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equipment is not available. \nDiscard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \nDocument the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percutaneous procedures. \nWash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \nDisinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \nHandle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as possible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -8688,14 +8688,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nWash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids.", + "Sentence": "\nWash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids.", "newParagraph": "simple infection control measure reduce risk transmission blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person nuse new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recommended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equipment available ndiscard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full ndocument quality sterilization medical equipment used percutaneous procedure nwash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid ndisinfect instrument contaminated equipment nhandle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little possible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water", "ProcessedSent": "nwash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid", "SentID": 482 }, { "ParagraphID": 225, - "Paragraph": "Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmission of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\nUse of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recommended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equipment is not available. \\nDiscard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\nDocument the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percutaneous procedures. \\nWash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\nDisinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\nHandle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as possible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water.", + "Paragraph": "Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmission of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \nUse of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recommended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equipment is not available. \nDiscard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \nDocument the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percutaneous procedures. \nWash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \nDisinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \nHandle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as possible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -8706,14 +8706,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nDisinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment.", + "Sentence": "\nDisinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment.", "newParagraph": "simple infection control measure reduce risk transmission blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person nuse new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recommended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equipment available ndiscard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full ndocument quality sterilization medical equipment used percutaneous procedure nwash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid ndisinfect instrument contaminated equipment nhandle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little possible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water", "ProcessedSent": "ndisinfect instrument contaminated equipment", "SentID": 483 }, { "ParagraphID": 225, - "Paragraph": "Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmission of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\nUse of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recommended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equipment is not available. \\nDiscard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\nDocument the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percutaneous procedures. \\nWash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\nDisinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\nHandle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as possible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water.", + "Paragraph": "Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmission of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \nUse of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recommended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equipment is not available. \nDiscard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \nDocument the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percutaneous procedures. \nWash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \nDisinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \nHandle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as possible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -8724,14 +8724,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nHandle properly soiled linen with care.", + "Sentence": "\nHandle properly soiled linen with care.", "newParagraph": "simple infection control measure reduce risk transmission blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person nuse new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recommended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equipment available ndiscard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full ndocument quality sterilization medical equipment used percutaneous procedure nwash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid ndisinfect instrument contaminated equipment nhandle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little possible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water", "ProcessedSent": "nhandle properly soiled linen care", "SentID": 484 }, { "ParagraphID": 225, - "Paragraph": "Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmission of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\nUse of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recommended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equipment is not available. \\nDiscard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\nDocument the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percutaneous procedures. \\nWash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\nDisinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\nHandle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as possible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water.", + "Paragraph": "Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmission of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \nUse of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recommended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equipment is not available. \nDiscard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \nDocument the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percutaneous procedures. \nWash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \nDisinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \nHandle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as possible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -8749,7 +8749,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 225, - "Paragraph": "Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmission of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\nUse of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recommended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equipment is not available. \\nDiscard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\nDocument the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percutaneous procedures. \\nWash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\nDisinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\nHandle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as possible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water.", + "Paragraph": "Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmission of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \nUse of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recommended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equipment is not available. \nDiscard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \nDocument the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percutaneous procedures. \nWash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \nDisinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \nHandle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as possible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -8767,7 +8767,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 225, - "Paragraph": "Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmission of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\nUse of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recommended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equipment is not available. \\nDiscard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\nDocument the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percutaneous procedures. \\nWash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\nDisinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\nHandle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as possible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water.", + "Paragraph": "Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmission of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \nUse of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recommended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equipment is not available. \nDiscard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \nDocument the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percutaneous procedures. \nWash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \nDisinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \nHandle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as possible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -8983,7 +8983,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 233, - "Paragraph": "Anything used, designed or used or intended for use: \\n(1) in causing death or injury to any person; or \\n(2) for the purposes of threatening or intimidating any person and, without restricting the generality of the foregoing, includes a firearm.", + "Paragraph": "Anything used, designed or used or intended for use: \n(1) in causing death or injury to any person; or \n(2) for the purposes of threatening or intimidating any person and, without restricting the generality of the foregoing, includes a firearm.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -8994,7 +8994,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Anything used, designed or used or intended for use: \\n(1) in causing death or injury to any person; or \\n(2) for the purposes of threatening or intimidating any person and, without restricting the generality of the foregoing, includes a firearm.", + "Sentence": "Anything used, designed or used or intended for use: \n(1) in causing death or injury to any person; or \n(2) for the purposes of threatening or intimidating any person and, without restricting the generality of the foregoing, includes a firearm.", "newParagraph": "anything used designed used intended use n1 causing death injury person n2 purpose threatening intimidating person without restricting generality foregoing includes firearm", "ProcessedSent": "anything used designed used intended use n1 causing death injury person n2 purpose threatening intimidating person without restricting generality foregoing includes firearm", "SentID": 499 @@ -9127,7 +9127,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 240, - "Paragraph": "Within the DDR context, weapons management refers to the handling, administration and oversight of surrendered weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance (UXO) whether received, disposed of, destroyed or kept in long-term storage. An integral part of managing weapons during the DDR process is their registration, which should preferably be managed by international and government agencies, and local police, and monitored by international forces. A good inventory list of weapons\u2019 serial numbers allows for the effective tracing and tracking of weapons\u2019 future usage. During voluntary weapons collections, food or money-related incentives are given in order to encourage registration. \\nAlternately, weapons management refers to a national government\u2019s administration of its own legal weapons stock. Such administration includes registration, according to national legislation, of the type, number, location and condition of weapons. In addition, a national government\u2019s implementation of its transfer controls of weapons, to decrease illicit weapons\u2019 flow, and regulations for weapons\u2019 export and import authorizations (within existing State responsibilities), also fall under this definition.", + "Paragraph": "Within the DDR context, weapons management refers to the handling, administration and oversight of surrendered weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance (UXO) whether received, disposed of, destroyed or kept in long-term storage. An integral part of managing weapons during the DDR process is their registration, which should preferably be managed by international and government agencies, and local police, and monitored by international forces. A good inventory list of weapons\u2019 serial numbers allows for the effective tracing and tracking of weapons\u2019 future usage. During voluntary weapons collections, food or money-related incentives are given in order to encourage registration. \nAlternately, weapons management refers to a national government\u2019s administration of its own legal weapons stock. Such administration includes registration, according to national legislation, of the type, number, location and condition of weapons. In addition, a national government\u2019s implementation of its transfer controls of weapons, to decrease illicit weapons\u2019 flow, and regulations for weapons\u2019 export and import authorizations (within existing State responsibilities), also fall under this definition.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -9145,7 +9145,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 240, - "Paragraph": "Within the DDR context, weapons management refers to the handling, administration and oversight of surrendered weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance (UXO) whether received, disposed of, destroyed or kept in long-term storage. An integral part of managing weapons during the DDR process is their registration, which should preferably be managed by international and government agencies, and local police, and monitored by international forces. A good inventory list of weapons\u2019 serial numbers allows for the effective tracing and tracking of weapons\u2019 future usage. During voluntary weapons collections, food or money-related incentives are given in order to encourage registration. \\nAlternately, weapons management refers to a national government\u2019s administration of its own legal weapons stock. Such administration includes registration, according to national legislation, of the type, number, location and condition of weapons. In addition, a national government\u2019s implementation of its transfer controls of weapons, to decrease illicit weapons\u2019 flow, and regulations for weapons\u2019 export and import authorizations (within existing State responsibilities), also fall under this definition.", + "Paragraph": "Within the DDR context, weapons management refers to the handling, administration and oversight of surrendered weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance (UXO) whether received, disposed of, destroyed or kept in long-term storage. An integral part of managing weapons during the DDR process is their registration, which should preferably be managed by international and government agencies, and local police, and monitored by international forces. A good inventory list of weapons\u2019 serial numbers allows for the effective tracing and tracking of weapons\u2019 future usage. During voluntary weapons collections, food or money-related incentives are given in order to encourage registration. \nAlternately, weapons management refers to a national government\u2019s administration of its own legal weapons stock. Such administration includes registration, according to national legislation, of the type, number, location and condition of weapons. In addition, a national government\u2019s implementation of its transfer controls of weapons, to decrease illicit weapons\u2019 flow, and regulations for weapons\u2019 export and import authorizations (within existing State responsibilities), also fall under this definition.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -9163,7 +9163,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 240, - "Paragraph": "Within the DDR context, weapons management refers to the handling, administration and oversight of surrendered weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance (UXO) whether received, disposed of, destroyed or kept in long-term storage. An integral part of managing weapons during the DDR process is their registration, which should preferably be managed by international and government agencies, and local police, and monitored by international forces. A good inventory list of weapons\u2019 serial numbers allows for the effective tracing and tracking of weapons\u2019 future usage. During voluntary weapons collections, food or money-related incentives are given in order to encourage registration. \\nAlternately, weapons management refers to a national government\u2019s administration of its own legal weapons stock. Such administration includes registration, according to national legislation, of the type, number, location and condition of weapons. In addition, a national government\u2019s implementation of its transfer controls of weapons, to decrease illicit weapons\u2019 flow, and regulations for weapons\u2019 export and import authorizations (within existing State responsibilities), also fall under this definition.", + "Paragraph": "Within the DDR context, weapons management refers to the handling, administration and oversight of surrendered weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance (UXO) whether received, disposed of, destroyed or kept in long-term storage. An integral part of managing weapons during the DDR process is their registration, which should preferably be managed by international and government agencies, and local police, and monitored by international forces. A good inventory list of weapons\u2019 serial numbers allows for the effective tracing and tracking of weapons\u2019 future usage. During voluntary weapons collections, food or money-related incentives are given in order to encourage registration. \nAlternately, weapons management refers to a national government\u2019s administration of its own legal weapons stock. Such administration includes registration, according to national legislation, of the type, number, location and condition of weapons. In addition, a national government\u2019s implementation of its transfer controls of weapons, to decrease illicit weapons\u2019 flow, and regulations for weapons\u2019 export and import authorizations (within existing State responsibilities), also fall under this definition.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -9181,7 +9181,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 240, - "Paragraph": "Within the DDR context, weapons management refers to the handling, administration and oversight of surrendered weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance (UXO) whether received, disposed of, destroyed or kept in long-term storage. An integral part of managing weapons during the DDR process is their registration, which should preferably be managed by international and government agencies, and local police, and monitored by international forces. A good inventory list of weapons\u2019 serial numbers allows for the effective tracing and tracking of weapons\u2019 future usage. During voluntary weapons collections, food or money-related incentives are given in order to encourage registration. \\nAlternately, weapons management refers to a national government\u2019s administration of its own legal weapons stock. Such administration includes registration, according to national legislation, of the type, number, location and condition of weapons. In addition, a national government\u2019s implementation of its transfer controls of weapons, to decrease illicit weapons\u2019 flow, and regulations for weapons\u2019 export and import authorizations (within existing State responsibilities), also fall under this definition.", + "Paragraph": "Within the DDR context, weapons management refers to the handling, administration and oversight of surrendered weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance (UXO) whether received, disposed of, destroyed or kept in long-term storage. An integral part of managing weapons during the DDR process is their registration, which should preferably be managed by international and government agencies, and local police, and monitored by international forces. A good inventory list of weapons\u2019 serial numbers allows for the effective tracing and tracking of weapons\u2019 future usage. During voluntary weapons collections, food or money-related incentives are given in order to encourage registration. \nAlternately, weapons management refers to a national government\u2019s administration of its own legal weapons stock. Such administration includes registration, according to national legislation, of the type, number, location and condition of weapons. In addition, a national government\u2019s implementation of its transfer controls of weapons, to decrease illicit weapons\u2019 flow, and regulations for weapons\u2019 export and import authorizations (within existing State responsibilities), also fall under this definition.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -9199,7 +9199,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 240, - "Paragraph": "Within the DDR context, weapons management refers to the handling, administration and oversight of surrendered weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance (UXO) whether received, disposed of, destroyed or kept in long-term storage. An integral part of managing weapons during the DDR process is their registration, which should preferably be managed by international and government agencies, and local police, and monitored by international forces. A good inventory list of weapons\u2019 serial numbers allows for the effective tracing and tracking of weapons\u2019 future usage. During voluntary weapons collections, food or money-related incentives are given in order to encourage registration. \\nAlternately, weapons management refers to a national government\u2019s administration of its own legal weapons stock. Such administration includes registration, according to national legislation, of the type, number, location and condition of weapons. In addition, a national government\u2019s implementation of its transfer controls of weapons, to decrease illicit weapons\u2019 flow, and regulations for weapons\u2019 export and import authorizations (within existing State responsibilities), also fall under this definition.", + "Paragraph": "Within the DDR context, weapons management refers to the handling, administration and oversight of surrendered weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance (UXO) whether received, disposed of, destroyed or kept in long-term storage. An integral part of managing weapons during the DDR process is their registration, which should preferably be managed by international and government agencies, and local police, and monitored by international forces. A good inventory list of weapons\u2019 serial numbers allows for the effective tracing and tracking of weapons\u2019 future usage. During voluntary weapons collections, food or money-related incentives are given in order to encourage registration. \nAlternately, weapons management refers to a national government\u2019s administration of its own legal weapons stock. Such administration includes registration, according to national legislation, of the type, number, location and condition of weapons. In addition, a national government\u2019s implementation of its transfer controls of weapons, to decrease illicit weapons\u2019 flow, and regulations for weapons\u2019 export and import authorizations (within existing State responsibilities), also fall under this definition.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -9210,14 +9210,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nAlternately, weapons management refers to a national government\u2019s administration of its own legal weapons stock.", + "Sentence": "\nAlternately, weapons management refers to a national government\u2019s administration of its own legal weapons stock.", "newParagraph": "within ddr context weapon management refers handling administration oversight surrendered weapon ammunition unexploded ordnance uxo whether received disposed destroyed kept longterm storage integral part managing weapon ddr process registration preferably managed international government agency local police monitored international force good inventory list weapon serial number allows effective tracing tracking weapon future usage voluntary weapon collection food moneyrelated incentive given order encourage registration nalternately weapon management refers national government administration legal weapon stock administration includes registration according national legislation type number location condition weapon addition national government implementation transfer control weapon decrease illicit weapon flow regulation weapon export import authorization within existing state responsibility also fall definition", "ProcessedSent": "nalternately weapon management refers national government administration legal weapon stock", "SentID": 511 }, { "ParagraphID": 240, - "Paragraph": "Within the DDR context, weapons management refers to the handling, administration and oversight of surrendered weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance (UXO) whether received, disposed of, destroyed or kept in long-term storage. An integral part of managing weapons during the DDR process is their registration, which should preferably be managed by international and government agencies, and local police, and monitored by international forces. A good inventory list of weapons\u2019 serial numbers allows for the effective tracing and tracking of weapons\u2019 future usage. During voluntary weapons collections, food or money-related incentives are given in order to encourage registration. \\nAlternately, weapons management refers to a national government\u2019s administration of its own legal weapons stock. Such administration includes registration, according to national legislation, of the type, number, location and condition of weapons. In addition, a national government\u2019s implementation of its transfer controls of weapons, to decrease illicit weapons\u2019 flow, and regulations for weapons\u2019 export and import authorizations (within existing State responsibilities), also fall under this definition.", + "Paragraph": "Within the DDR context, weapons management refers to the handling, administration and oversight of surrendered weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance (UXO) whether received, disposed of, destroyed or kept in long-term storage. An integral part of managing weapons during the DDR process is their registration, which should preferably be managed by international and government agencies, and local police, and monitored by international forces. A good inventory list of weapons\u2019 serial numbers allows for the effective tracing and tracking of weapons\u2019 future usage. During voluntary weapons collections, food or money-related incentives are given in order to encourage registration. \nAlternately, weapons management refers to a national government\u2019s administration of its own legal weapons stock. Such administration includes registration, according to national legislation, of the type, number, location and condition of weapons. In addition, a national government\u2019s implementation of its transfer controls of weapons, to decrease illicit weapons\u2019 flow, and regulations for weapons\u2019 export and import authorizations (within existing State responsibilities), also fall under this definition.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -9235,7 +9235,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 240, - "Paragraph": "Within the DDR context, weapons management refers to the handling, administration and oversight of surrendered weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance (UXO) whether received, disposed of, destroyed or kept in long-term storage. An integral part of managing weapons during the DDR process is their registration, which should preferably be managed by international and government agencies, and local police, and monitored by international forces. A good inventory list of weapons\u2019 serial numbers allows for the effective tracing and tracking of weapons\u2019 future usage. During voluntary weapons collections, food or money-related incentives are given in order to encourage registration. \\nAlternately, weapons management refers to a national government\u2019s administration of its own legal weapons stock. Such administration includes registration, according to national legislation, of the type, number, location and condition of weapons. In addition, a national government\u2019s implementation of its transfer controls of weapons, to decrease illicit weapons\u2019 flow, and regulations for weapons\u2019 export and import authorizations (within existing State responsibilities), also fall under this definition.", + "Paragraph": "Within the DDR context, weapons management refers to the handling, administration and oversight of surrendered weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance (UXO) whether received, disposed of, destroyed or kept in long-term storage. An integral part of managing weapons during the DDR process is their registration, which should preferably be managed by international and government agencies, and local police, and monitored by international forces. A good inventory list of weapons\u2019 serial numbers allows for the effective tracing and tracking of weapons\u2019 future usage. During voluntary weapons collections, food or money-related incentives are given in order to encourage registration. \nAlternately, weapons management refers to a national government\u2019s administration of its own legal weapons stock. Such administration includes registration, according to national legislation, of the type, number, location and condition of weapons. In addition, a national government\u2019s implementation of its transfer controls of weapons, to decrease illicit weapons\u2019 flow, and regulations for weapons\u2019 export and import authorizations (within existing State responsibilities), also fall under this definition.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -9523,7 +9523,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 245, - "Paragraph": "Integrated disarmament, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) is part of the United Nations (UN) system\u2019s multidimensional approach that contributes to the entire peace continuum, from prevention, conflict resolution and peacekeeping, to peace-building and development. Integrated DDR processes are made up of various combinations of: \\nDDR programmes; \\nDDR-related tools; \\nReintegration support, including when complementing DDR-related tools.", + "Paragraph": "Integrated disarmament, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) is part of the United Nations (UN) system\u2019s multidimensional approach that contributes to the entire peace continuum, from prevention, conflict resolution and peacekeeping, to peace-building and development. Integrated DDR processes are made up of various combinations of: \nDDR programmes; \nDDR-related tools; \nReintegration support, including when complementing DDR-related tools.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -9541,7 +9541,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 245, - "Paragraph": "Integrated disarmament, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) is part of the United Nations (UN) system\u2019s multidimensional approach that contributes to the entire peace continuum, from prevention, conflict resolution and peacekeeping, to peace-building and development. Integrated DDR processes are made up of various combinations of: \\nDDR programmes; \\nDDR-related tools; \\nReintegration support, including when complementing DDR-related tools.", + "Paragraph": "Integrated disarmament, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) is part of the United Nations (UN) system\u2019s multidimensional approach that contributes to the entire peace continuum, from prevention, conflict resolution and peacekeeping, to peace-building and development. Integrated DDR processes are made up of various combinations of: \nDDR programmes; \nDDR-related tools; \nReintegration support, including when complementing DDR-related tools.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -9552,7 +9552,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Integrated DDR processes are made up of various combinations of: \\nDDR programmes; \\nDDR-related tools; \\nReintegration support, including when complementing DDR-related tools.", + "Sentence": "Integrated DDR processes are made up of various combinations of: \nDDR programmes; \nDDR-related tools; \nReintegration support, including when complementing DDR-related tools.", "newParagraph": "integrated disarmament demobilization reintegration ddr part united nation un system multidimensional approach contributes entire peace continuum prevention conflict resolution peacekeeping peacebuilding development integrated ddr process made various combination nddr programme nddrrelated tool nreintegration support including complementing ddrrelated tool", "ProcessedSent": "integrated ddr process made various combination nddr programme nddrrelated tool nreintegration support including complementing ddrrelated tool", "SentID": 530 @@ -9847,7 +9847,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 252, - "Paragraph": "Five categories of people should be taken into consideration in integrated DDR processes as participants or beneficiaries, depending on the context: \\n1. members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \\n2. abductees or victims; \\n3. dependents\/families; \\n4. civilian returnees or \u2018self-demobilized\u2019; \\n5. community members.", + "Paragraph": "Five categories of people should be taken into consideration in integrated DDR processes as participants or beneficiaries, depending on the context: \n1. members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \n2. abductees or victims; \n3. dependents\/families; \n4. civilian returnees or \u2018self-demobilized\u2019; \n5. community members.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -9858,14 +9858,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Five categories of people should be taken into consideration in integrated DDR processes as participants or beneficiaries, depending on the context: \\n1.", + "Sentence": "Five categories of people should be taken into consideration in integrated DDR processes as participants or beneficiaries, depending on the context: \n1.", "newParagraph": "five category people taken consideration integrated ddr process participant beneficiary depending context n1 member armed force group served combat andor support role support role often referred associated armed force group n2 abductees victim n3 dependentsfamilies n4 civilian returnees selfdemobilized n5 community member", "ProcessedSent": "five category people taken consideration integrated ddr process participant beneficiary depending context n1", "SentID": 547 }, { "ParagraphID": 252, - "Paragraph": "Five categories of people should be taken into consideration in integrated DDR processes as participants or beneficiaries, depending on the context: \\n1. members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \\n2. abductees or victims; \\n3. dependents\/families; \\n4. civilian returnees or \u2018self-demobilized\u2019; \\n5. community members.", + "Paragraph": "Five categories of people should be taken into consideration in integrated DDR processes as participants or beneficiaries, depending on the context: \n1. members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \n2. abductees or victims; \n3. dependents\/families; \n4. civilian returnees or \u2018self-demobilized\u2019; \n5. community members.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -9876,14 +9876,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \\n2.", + "Sentence": "members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \n2.", "newParagraph": "five category people taken consideration integrated ddr process participant beneficiary depending context n1 member armed force group served combat andor support role support role often referred associated armed force group n2 abductees victim n3 dependentsfamilies n4 civilian returnees selfdemobilized n5 community member", "ProcessedSent": "member armed force group served combat andor support role support role often referred associated armed force group n2", "SentID": 548 }, { "ParagraphID": 252, - "Paragraph": "Five categories of people should be taken into consideration in integrated DDR processes as participants or beneficiaries, depending on the context: \\n1. members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \\n2. abductees or victims; \\n3. dependents\/families; \\n4. civilian returnees or \u2018self-demobilized\u2019; \\n5. community members.", + "Paragraph": "Five categories of people should be taken into consideration in integrated DDR processes as participants or beneficiaries, depending on the context: \n1. members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \n2. abductees or victims; \n3. dependents\/families; \n4. civilian returnees or \u2018self-demobilized\u2019; \n5. community members.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -9894,14 +9894,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "abductees or victims; \\n3.", + "Sentence": "abductees or victims; \n3.", "newParagraph": "five category people taken consideration integrated ddr process participant beneficiary depending context n1 member armed force group served combat andor support role support role often referred associated armed force group n2 abductees victim n3 dependentsfamilies n4 civilian returnees selfdemobilized n5 community member", "ProcessedSent": "abductees victim n3", "SentID": 549 }, { "ParagraphID": 252, - "Paragraph": "Five categories of people should be taken into consideration in integrated DDR processes as participants or beneficiaries, depending on the context: \\n1. members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \\n2. abductees or victims; \\n3. dependents\/families; \\n4. civilian returnees or \u2018self-demobilized\u2019; \\n5. community members.", + "Paragraph": "Five categories of people should be taken into consideration in integrated DDR processes as participants or beneficiaries, depending on the context: \n1. members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \n2. abductees or victims; \n3. dependents\/families; \n4. civilian returnees or \u2018self-demobilized\u2019; \n5. community members.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -9912,14 +9912,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "dependents\/families; \\n4.", + "Sentence": "dependents\/families; \n4.", "newParagraph": "five category people taken consideration integrated ddr process participant beneficiary depending context n1 member armed force group served combat andor support role support role often referred associated armed force group n2 abductees victim n3 dependentsfamilies n4 civilian returnees selfdemobilized n5 community member", "ProcessedSent": "dependentsfamilies n4", "SentID": 550 }, { "ParagraphID": 252, - "Paragraph": "Five categories of people should be taken into consideration in integrated DDR processes as participants or beneficiaries, depending on the context: \\n1. members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \\n2. abductees or victims; \\n3. dependents\/families; \\n4. civilian returnees or \u2018self-demobilized\u2019; \\n5. community members.", + "Paragraph": "Five categories of people should be taken into consideration in integrated DDR processes as participants or beneficiaries, depending on the context: \n1. members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \n2. abductees or victims; \n3. dependents\/families; \n4. civilian returnees or \u2018self-demobilized\u2019; \n5. community members.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -9930,14 +9930,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "civilian returnees or \u2018self-demobilized\u2019; \\n5.", + "Sentence": "civilian returnees or \u2018self-demobilized\u2019; \n5.", "newParagraph": "five category people taken consideration integrated ddr process participant beneficiary depending context n1 member armed force group served combat andor support role support role often referred associated armed force group n2 abductees victim n3 dependentsfamilies n4 civilian returnees selfdemobilized n5 community member", "ProcessedSent": "civilian returnees selfdemobilized n5", "SentID": 551 }, { "ParagraphID": 252, - "Paragraph": "Five categories of people should be taken into consideration in integrated DDR processes as participants or beneficiaries, depending on the context: \\n1. members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \\n2. abductees or victims; \\n3. dependents\/families; \\n4. civilian returnees or \u2018self-demobilized\u2019; \\n5. community members.", + "Paragraph": "Five categories of people should be taken into consideration in integrated DDR processes as participants or beneficiaries, depending on the context: \n1. members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \n2. abductees or victims; \n3. dependents\/families; \n4. civilian returnees or \u2018self-demobilized\u2019; \n5. community members.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -10081,7 +10081,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 255, - "Paragraph": "Lessons and experiences have shown that the following preconditions are required for the implementation of a viable DDR programme: \\nthe signing of a negotiated ceasefire and\/or peace agreement that provides the framework for DDR; \\ntrust in the peace process; \\nwillingness of the parties to the armed conflict to engage in DDR; and \\na minimum guarantee of security.", + "Paragraph": "Lessons and experiences have shown that the following preconditions are required for the implementation of a viable DDR programme: \nthe signing of a negotiated ceasefire and\/or peace agreement that provides the framework for DDR; \ntrust in the peace process; \nwillingness of the parties to the armed conflict to engage in DDR; and \na minimum guarantee of security.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -10092,7 +10092,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Lessons and experiences have shown that the following preconditions are required for the implementation of a viable DDR programme: \\nthe signing of a negotiated ceasefire and\/or peace agreement that provides the framework for DDR; \\ntrust in the peace process; \\nwillingness of the parties to the armed conflict to engage in DDR; and \\na minimum guarantee of security.", + "Sentence": "Lessons and experiences have shown that the following preconditions are required for the implementation of a viable DDR programme: \nthe signing of a negotiated ceasefire and\/or peace agreement that provides the framework for DDR; \ntrust in the peace process; \nwillingness of the parties to the armed conflict to engage in DDR; and \na minimum guarantee of security.", "newParagraph": "lesson experience shown following precondition required implementation viable ddr programme nthe signing negotiated ceasefire andor peace agreement provides framework ddr ntrust peace process nwillingness party armed conflict engage ddr na minimum guarantee security", "ProcessedSent": "lesson experience shown following precondition required implementation viable ddr programme nthe signing negotiated ceasefire andor peace agreement provides framework ddr ntrust peace process nwillingness party armed conflict engage ddr na minimum guarantee security", "SentID": 560 @@ -10585,7 +10585,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 264, - "Paragraph": "This module outlines the reasons behind integrated DDR, defines the elements that makeup DDR programmes as agreed by the UN General Assembly, and establishes how the UN views integrated DDR processes. The module also defines the UN approach to integrated DDR for both mission and non-mission settings, which is: \\nvoluntary; \\npeople-centred; \\ngender-responsive and inclusive; \\nconflict-sensitive; \\ncontext-specific; \\nflexible, accountable and transparent; \\nnationally and locally owned; \\nregionally supported; \\nintegrated; and \\nwell planned.", + "Paragraph": "This module outlines the reasons behind integrated DDR, defines the elements that makeup DDR programmes as agreed by the UN General Assembly, and establishes how the UN views integrated DDR processes. The module also defines the UN approach to integrated DDR for both mission and non-mission settings, which is: \nvoluntary; \npeople-centred; \ngender-responsive and inclusive; \nconflict-sensitive; \ncontext-specific; \nflexible, accountable and transparent; \nnationally and locally owned; \nregionally supported; \nintegrated; and \nwell planned.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -10603,7 +10603,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 264, - "Paragraph": "This module outlines the reasons behind integrated DDR, defines the elements that makeup DDR programmes as agreed by the UN General Assembly, and establishes how the UN views integrated DDR processes. The module also defines the UN approach to integrated DDR for both mission and non-mission settings, which is: \\nvoluntary; \\npeople-centred; \\ngender-responsive and inclusive; \\nconflict-sensitive; \\ncontext-specific; \\nflexible, accountable and transparent; \\nnationally and locally owned; \\nregionally supported; \\nintegrated; and \\nwell planned.", + "Paragraph": "This module outlines the reasons behind integrated DDR, defines the elements that makeup DDR programmes as agreed by the UN General Assembly, and establishes how the UN views integrated DDR processes. The module also defines the UN approach to integrated DDR for both mission and non-mission settings, which is: \nvoluntary; \npeople-centred; \ngender-responsive and inclusive; \nconflict-sensitive; \ncontext-specific; \nflexible, accountable and transparent; \nnationally and locally owned; \nregionally supported; \nintegrated; and \nwell planned.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -10614,7 +10614,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The module also defines the UN approach to integrated DDR for both mission and non-mission settings, which is: \\nvoluntary; \\npeople-centred; \\ngender-responsive and inclusive; \\nconflict-sensitive; \\ncontext-specific; \\nflexible, accountable and transparent; \\nnationally and locally owned; \\nregionally supported; \\nintegrated; and \\nwell planned.", + "Sentence": "The module also defines the UN approach to integrated DDR for both mission and non-mission settings, which is: \nvoluntary; \npeople-centred; \ngender-responsive and inclusive; \nconflict-sensitive; \ncontext-specific; \nflexible, accountable and transparent; \nnationally and locally owned; \nregionally supported; \nintegrated; and \nwell planned.", "newParagraph": "module outline reason behind integrated ddr defines element makeup ddr programme agreed un general assembly establishes un view integrated ddr process module also defines un approach integrated ddr mission nonmission setting nvoluntary npeoplecentred ngenderresponsive inclusive nconflictsensitive ncontextspecific nflexible accountable transparent nnationally locally owned nregionally supported nintegrated nwell planned", "ProcessedSent": "module also defines un approach integrated ddr mission nonmission setting nvoluntary npeoplecentred ngenderresponsive inclusive nconflictsensitive ncontextspecific nflexible accountable transparent nnationally locally owned nregionally supported nintegrated nwell planned", "SentID": 589 @@ -10963,7 +10963,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 271, - "Paragraph": "Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open time frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance. \\n\\nRecognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 Note, the Third Report of the Secretary-General on DDR (2011) includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration \u2026 is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes\u201d, including interventions, such as psychosocial support, mental health counseling and clinical treatment and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/ transitional justice and participation in political processes. Additionally, it emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature \u2026 the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the individual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d \\n\\nNote by the Secretary-General on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations, 24 May 2005 (A\/C.5\/59\/31); Third report of the Secretary-General on disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741", + "Paragraph": "Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open time frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance. \n\nRecognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 Note, the Third Report of the Secretary-General on DDR (2011) includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration \u2026 is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes\u201d, including interventions, such as psychosocial support, mental health counseling and clinical treatment and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/ transitional justice and participation in political processes. Additionally, it emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature \u2026 the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the individual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d \n\nNote by the Secretary-General on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations, 24 May 2005 (A\/C.5\/59\/31); Third report of the Secretary-General on disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -10981,7 +10981,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 271, - "Paragraph": "Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open time frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance. \\n\\nRecognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 Note, the Third Report of the Secretary-General on DDR (2011) includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration \u2026 is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes\u201d, including interventions, such as psychosocial support, mental health counseling and clinical treatment and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/ transitional justice and participation in political processes. Additionally, it emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature \u2026 the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the individual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d \\n\\nNote by the Secretary-General on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations, 24 May 2005 (A\/C.5\/59\/31); Third report of the Secretary-General on disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741", + "Paragraph": "Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open time frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance. \n\nRecognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 Note, the Third Report of the Secretary-General on DDR (2011) includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration \u2026 is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes\u201d, including interventions, such as psychosocial support, mental health counseling and clinical treatment and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/ transitional justice and participation in political processes. Additionally, it emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature \u2026 the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the individual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d \n\nNote by the Secretary-General on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations, 24 May 2005 (A\/C.5\/59\/31); Third report of the Secretary-General on disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -10999,7 +10999,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 271, - "Paragraph": "Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open time frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance. \\n\\nRecognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 Note, the Third Report of the Secretary-General on DDR (2011) includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration \u2026 is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes\u201d, including interventions, such as psychosocial support, mental health counseling and clinical treatment and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/ transitional justice and participation in political processes. Additionally, it emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature \u2026 the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the individual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d \\n\\nNote by the Secretary-General on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations, 24 May 2005 (A\/C.5\/59\/31); Third report of the Secretary-General on disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741", + "Paragraph": "Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open time frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance. \n\nRecognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 Note, the Third Report of the Secretary-General on DDR (2011) includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration \u2026 is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes\u201d, including interventions, such as psychosocial support, mental health counseling and clinical treatment and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/ transitional justice and participation in political processes. Additionally, it emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature \u2026 the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the individual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d \n\nNote by the Secretary-General on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations, 24 May 2005 (A\/C.5\/59\/31); Third report of the Secretary-General on disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -11017,7 +11017,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 271, - "Paragraph": "Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open time frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance. \\n\\nRecognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 Note, the Third Report of the Secretary-General on DDR (2011) includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration \u2026 is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes\u201d, including interventions, such as psychosocial support, mental health counseling and clinical treatment and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/ transitional justice and participation in political processes. Additionally, it emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature \u2026 the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the individual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d \\n\\nNote by the Secretary-General on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations, 24 May 2005 (A\/C.5\/59\/31); Third report of the Secretary-General on disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741", + "Paragraph": "Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open time frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance. \n\nRecognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 Note, the Third Report of the Secretary-General on DDR (2011) includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration \u2026 is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes\u201d, including interventions, such as psychosocial support, mental health counseling and clinical treatment and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/ transitional justice and participation in political processes. Additionally, it emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature \u2026 the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the individual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d \n\nNote by the Secretary-General on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations, 24 May 2005 (A\/C.5\/59\/31); Third report of the Secretary-General on disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -11028,14 +11028,14 @@ "Heading2": "DEFINITIONS OF DISARMAMENT, DEMOBILIZATION AND REINTEGRATION", "Heading3": "REINTEGRATION", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\nRecognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 Note, the Third Report of the Secretary-General on DDR (2011) includes revised policy and guidance.", + "Sentence": "\n\nRecognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 Note, the Third Report of the Secretary-General on DDR (2011) includes revised policy and guidance.", "newParagraph": "reintegration process excombatants acquire civilian status gain sustainable employment income reintegration essentially social economic process open time frame primarily taking place community local level part general development country national responsibility often necessitates longterm external assistance nnrecognizing new development reintegration excombatants associated group since release 2005 note third report secretarygeneral ddr 2011 includes revised policy guidance observes country economic aspect central sufficient sustainable reintegration excombatants serious consideration social political aspect reintegration also crucial sustainability success reintegration programme including intervention psychosocial support mental health counseling clinical treatment medical health support well reconciliation access justice transitional justice participation political process additionally emphasizes reintegration programme supported united nation timebound nature reintegration excombatants associated group longterm process take place individual community national regional level dependent upon wider recovery development nnnote secretarygeneral administrative budgetary aspect financing un peacekeeping operation 24 may 2005 ac55931 third report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration 21 march 2011 a65741", "ProcessedSent": "nnrecognizing new development reintegration excombatants associated group since release 2005 note third report secretarygeneral ddr 2011 includes revised policy guidance", "SentID": 612 }, { "ParagraphID": 271, - "Paragraph": "Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open time frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance. \\n\\nRecognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 Note, the Third Report of the Secretary-General on DDR (2011) includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration \u2026 is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes\u201d, including interventions, such as psychosocial support, mental health counseling and clinical treatment and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/ transitional justice and participation in political processes. Additionally, it emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature \u2026 the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the individual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d \\n\\nNote by the Secretary-General on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations, 24 May 2005 (A\/C.5\/59\/31); Third report of the Secretary-General on disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741", + "Paragraph": "Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open time frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance. \n\nRecognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 Note, the Third Report of the Secretary-General on DDR (2011) includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration \u2026 is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes\u201d, including interventions, such as psychosocial support, mental health counseling and clinical treatment and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/ transitional justice and participation in political processes. Additionally, it emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature \u2026 the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the individual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d \n\nNote by the Secretary-General on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations, 24 May 2005 (A\/C.5\/59\/31); Third report of the Secretary-General on disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -11053,7 +11053,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 271, - "Paragraph": "Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open time frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance. \\n\\nRecognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 Note, the Third Report of the Secretary-General on DDR (2011) includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration \u2026 is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes\u201d, including interventions, such as psychosocial support, mental health counseling and clinical treatment and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/ transitional justice and participation in political processes. Additionally, it emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature \u2026 the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the individual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d \\n\\nNote by the Secretary-General on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations, 24 May 2005 (A\/C.5\/59\/31); Third report of the Secretary-General on disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741", + "Paragraph": "Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open time frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance. \n\nRecognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 Note, the Third Report of the Secretary-General on DDR (2011) includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration \u2026 is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes\u201d, including interventions, such as psychosocial support, mental health counseling and clinical treatment and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/ transitional justice and participation in political processes. Additionally, it emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature \u2026 the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the individual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d \n\nNote by the Secretary-General on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations, 24 May 2005 (A\/C.5\/59\/31); Third report of the Secretary-General on disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -11071,7 +11071,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 271, - "Paragraph": "Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open time frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance. \\n\\nRecognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 Note, the Third Report of the Secretary-General on DDR (2011) includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration \u2026 is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes\u201d, including interventions, such as psychosocial support, mental health counseling and clinical treatment and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/ transitional justice and participation in political processes. Additionally, it emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature \u2026 the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the individual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d \\n\\nNote by the Secretary-General on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations, 24 May 2005 (A\/C.5\/59\/31); Third report of the Secretary-General on disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741", + "Paragraph": "Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open time frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance. \n\nRecognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 Note, the Third Report of the Secretary-General on DDR (2011) includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration \u2026 is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes\u201d, including interventions, such as psychosocial support, mental health counseling and clinical treatment and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/ transitional justice and participation in political processes. Additionally, it emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature \u2026 the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the individual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d \n\nNote by the Secretary-General on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations, 24 May 2005 (A\/C.5\/59\/31); Third report of the Secretary-General on disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -11082,7 +11082,7 @@ "Heading2": "DEFINITIONS OF DISARMAMENT, DEMOBILIZATION AND REINTEGRATION", "Heading3": "REINTEGRATION", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Additionally, it emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature \u2026 the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the individual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d \\n\\nNote by the Secretary-General on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations, 24 May 2005 (A\/C.5\/59\/31); Third report of the Secretary-General on disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741", + "Sentence": "Additionally, it emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature \u2026 the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the individual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d \n\nNote by the Secretary-General on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations, 24 May 2005 (A\/C.5\/59\/31); Third report of the Secretary-General on disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741", "newParagraph": "reintegration process excombatants acquire civilian status gain sustainable employment income reintegration essentially social economic process open time frame primarily taking place community local level part general development country national responsibility often necessitates longterm external assistance nnrecognizing new development reintegration excombatants associated group since release 2005 note third report secretarygeneral ddr 2011 includes revised policy guidance observes country economic aspect central sufficient sustainable reintegration excombatants serious consideration social political aspect reintegration also crucial sustainability success reintegration programme including intervention psychosocial support mental health counseling clinical treatment medical health support well reconciliation access justice transitional justice participation political process additionally emphasizes reintegration programme supported united nation timebound nature reintegration excombatants associated group longterm process take place individual community national regional level dependent upon wider recovery development nnnote secretarygeneral administrative budgetary aspect financing un peacekeeping operation 24 may 2005 ac55931 third report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration 21 march 2011 a65741", "ProcessedSent": "additionally emphasizes reintegration programme supported united nation timebound nature reintegration excombatants associated group longterm process take place individual community national regional level dependent upon wider recovery development nnnote secretarygeneral administrative budgetary aspect financing un peacekeeping operation 24 may 2005 ac55931 third report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration 21 march 2011 a65741", "SentID": 615 @@ -11377,7 +11377,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 277, - "Paragraph": "The Sustaining Peace Approach \u2013 manifested in the General Assembly and Security Council twin resolutions on the Review of the United Nations Peacebuilding Architecture (General Assembly resolution 70\/262 and Security Council resolution 2282 [2016]) \u2013 underscores the mutually reinforcing relationship between prevention and sustaining peace, while recognizing that effective peacebuilding must involve the entire UN system. It also emphasizes the importance of joint analysis and effective strategic planning across the UN system in its long-term engagement with conflict-affected countries, and, where appropriate, in cooperation and coordination with regional and sub-regional organizations as well as international financial institutions. \\nIntegrated DDR also needs to be understood as a concrete and direct contribution to the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The SDGs are underpinned by the principle of leaving no one behind. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development explicitly links development to peace and security, while SDG 16 is \\nSDG 16.1: Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere. \\nSDG 16.4: By 2030, significantly reduce illicit financial and arms flows, strengthen the recovery and return of stolen assets and combat all forms of organized crime. \\nSDG 8.7: Take immediate steps to \u2026secure the prohibition and elimination of child labour, including recruitment and use of child soldiers, and by 2015 end child labour in all its forms. \\n\\nGender-responsive DDR also contributes to: \\nSDG 5.1: End all forms of discrimination against women. \\nSDG 5.2: Eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls in public and private spaces, including trafficking, sexual and other types of exploitation. \\nSDG 5.6: Ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights.", + "Paragraph": "The Sustaining Peace Approach \u2013 manifested in the General Assembly and Security Council twin resolutions on the Review of the United Nations Peacebuilding Architecture (General Assembly resolution 70\/262 and Security Council resolution 2282 [2016]) \u2013 underscores the mutually reinforcing relationship between prevention and sustaining peace, while recognizing that effective peacebuilding must involve the entire UN system. It also emphasizes the importance of joint analysis and effective strategic planning across the UN system in its long-term engagement with conflict-affected countries, and, where appropriate, in cooperation and coordination with regional and sub-regional organizations as well as international financial institutions. \nIntegrated DDR also needs to be understood as a concrete and direct contribution to the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The SDGs are underpinned by the principle of leaving no one behind. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development explicitly links development to peace and security, while SDG 16 is \nSDG 16.1: Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere. \nSDG 16.4: By 2030, significantly reduce illicit financial and arms flows, strengthen the recovery and return of stolen assets and combat all forms of organized crime. \nSDG 8.7: Take immediate steps to \u2026secure the prohibition and elimination of child labour, including recruitment and use of child soldiers, and by 2015 end child labour in all its forms. \n\nGender-responsive DDR also contributes to: \nSDG 5.1: End all forms of discrimination against women. \nSDG 5.2: Eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls in public and private spaces, including trafficking, sexual and other types of exploitation. \nSDG 5.6: Ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -11395,7 +11395,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 277, - "Paragraph": "The Sustaining Peace Approach \u2013 manifested in the General Assembly and Security Council twin resolutions on the Review of the United Nations Peacebuilding Architecture (General Assembly resolution 70\/262 and Security Council resolution 2282 [2016]) \u2013 underscores the mutually reinforcing relationship between prevention and sustaining peace, while recognizing that effective peacebuilding must involve the entire UN system. It also emphasizes the importance of joint analysis and effective strategic planning across the UN system in its long-term engagement with conflict-affected countries, and, where appropriate, in cooperation and coordination with regional and sub-regional organizations as well as international financial institutions. \\nIntegrated DDR also needs to be understood as a concrete and direct contribution to the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The SDGs are underpinned by the principle of leaving no one behind. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development explicitly links development to peace and security, while SDG 16 is \\nSDG 16.1: Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere. \\nSDG 16.4: By 2030, significantly reduce illicit financial and arms flows, strengthen the recovery and return of stolen assets and combat all forms of organized crime. \\nSDG 8.7: Take immediate steps to \u2026secure the prohibition and elimination of child labour, including recruitment and use of child soldiers, and by 2015 end child labour in all its forms. \\n\\nGender-responsive DDR also contributes to: \\nSDG 5.1: End all forms of discrimination against women. \\nSDG 5.2: Eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls in public and private spaces, including trafficking, sexual and other types of exploitation. \\nSDG 5.6: Ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights.", + "Paragraph": "The Sustaining Peace Approach \u2013 manifested in the General Assembly and Security Council twin resolutions on the Review of the United Nations Peacebuilding Architecture (General Assembly resolution 70\/262 and Security Council resolution 2282 [2016]) \u2013 underscores the mutually reinforcing relationship between prevention and sustaining peace, while recognizing that effective peacebuilding must involve the entire UN system. It also emphasizes the importance of joint analysis and effective strategic planning across the UN system in its long-term engagement with conflict-affected countries, and, where appropriate, in cooperation and coordination with regional and sub-regional organizations as well as international financial institutions. \nIntegrated DDR also needs to be understood as a concrete and direct contribution to the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The SDGs are underpinned by the principle of leaving no one behind. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development explicitly links development to peace and security, while SDG 16 is \nSDG 16.1: Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere. \nSDG 16.4: By 2030, significantly reduce illicit financial and arms flows, strengthen the recovery and return of stolen assets and combat all forms of organized crime. \nSDG 8.7: Take immediate steps to \u2026secure the prohibition and elimination of child labour, including recruitment and use of child soldiers, and by 2015 end child labour in all its forms. \n\nGender-responsive DDR also contributes to: \nSDG 5.1: End all forms of discrimination against women. \nSDG 5.2: Eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls in public and private spaces, including trafficking, sexual and other types of exploitation. \nSDG 5.6: Ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -11413,7 +11413,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 277, - "Paragraph": "The Sustaining Peace Approach \u2013 manifested in the General Assembly and Security Council twin resolutions on the Review of the United Nations Peacebuilding Architecture (General Assembly resolution 70\/262 and Security Council resolution 2282 [2016]) \u2013 underscores the mutually reinforcing relationship between prevention and sustaining peace, while recognizing that effective peacebuilding must involve the entire UN system. It also emphasizes the importance of joint analysis and effective strategic planning across the UN system in its long-term engagement with conflict-affected countries, and, where appropriate, in cooperation and coordination with regional and sub-regional organizations as well as international financial institutions. \\nIntegrated DDR also needs to be understood as a concrete and direct contribution to the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The SDGs are underpinned by the principle of leaving no one behind. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development explicitly links development to peace and security, while SDG 16 is \\nSDG 16.1: Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere. \\nSDG 16.4: By 2030, significantly reduce illicit financial and arms flows, strengthen the recovery and return of stolen assets and combat all forms of organized crime. \\nSDG 8.7: Take immediate steps to \u2026secure the prohibition and elimination of child labour, including recruitment and use of child soldiers, and by 2015 end child labour in all its forms. \\n\\nGender-responsive DDR also contributes to: \\nSDG 5.1: End all forms of discrimination against women. \\nSDG 5.2: Eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls in public and private spaces, including trafficking, sexual and other types of exploitation. \\nSDG 5.6: Ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights.", + "Paragraph": "The Sustaining Peace Approach \u2013 manifested in the General Assembly and Security Council twin resolutions on the Review of the United Nations Peacebuilding Architecture (General Assembly resolution 70\/262 and Security Council resolution 2282 [2016]) \u2013 underscores the mutually reinforcing relationship between prevention and sustaining peace, while recognizing that effective peacebuilding must involve the entire UN system. It also emphasizes the importance of joint analysis and effective strategic planning across the UN system in its long-term engagement with conflict-affected countries, and, where appropriate, in cooperation and coordination with regional and sub-regional organizations as well as international financial institutions. \nIntegrated DDR also needs to be understood as a concrete and direct contribution to the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The SDGs are underpinned by the principle of leaving no one behind. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development explicitly links development to peace and security, while SDG 16 is \nSDG 16.1: Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere. \nSDG 16.4: By 2030, significantly reduce illicit financial and arms flows, strengthen the recovery and return of stolen assets and combat all forms of organized crime. \nSDG 8.7: Take immediate steps to \u2026secure the prohibition and elimination of child labour, including recruitment and use of child soldiers, and by 2015 end child labour in all its forms. \n\nGender-responsive DDR also contributes to: \nSDG 5.1: End all forms of discrimination against women. \nSDG 5.2: Eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls in public and private spaces, including trafficking, sexual and other types of exploitation. \nSDG 5.6: Ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -11424,14 +11424,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nIntegrated DDR also needs to be understood as a concrete and direct contribution to the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).", + "Sentence": "\nIntegrated DDR also needs to be understood as a concrete and direct contribution to the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).", "newParagraph": "sustaining peace approach manifested general assembly security council twin resolution review united nation peacebuilding architecture general assembly resolution 70262 security council resolution 2282 2016 underscore mutually reinforcing relationship prevention sustaining peace recognizing effective peacebuilding must involve entire un system also emphasizes importance joint analysis effective strategic planning across un system longterm engagement conflictaffected country appropriate cooperation coordination regional subregional organization well international financial institution nintegrated ddr also need understood concrete direct contribution implementation sustainable development goal sdgs sdgs underpinned principle leaving one behind 2030 agenda sustainable development explicitly link development peace security sdg 16 nsdg 161 significantly reduce form violence related death rate everywhere nsdg 164 2030 significantly reduce illicit financial arm flow strengthen recovery return stolen asset combat form organized crime nsdg 87 take immediate step secure prohibition elimination child labour including recruitment use child soldier 2015 end child labour form nngenderresponsive ddr also contributes nsdg 51 end form discrimination woman nsdg 52 eliminate form violence woman girl public private space including trafficking sexual type exploitation nsdg 56 ensure universal access sexual reproductive health reproductive right", "ProcessedSent": "nintegrated ddr also need understood concrete direct contribution implementation sustainable development goal sdgs", "SentID": 634 }, { "ParagraphID": 277, - "Paragraph": "The Sustaining Peace Approach \u2013 manifested in the General Assembly and Security Council twin resolutions on the Review of the United Nations Peacebuilding Architecture (General Assembly resolution 70\/262 and Security Council resolution 2282 [2016]) \u2013 underscores the mutually reinforcing relationship between prevention and sustaining peace, while recognizing that effective peacebuilding must involve the entire UN system. It also emphasizes the importance of joint analysis and effective strategic planning across the UN system in its long-term engagement with conflict-affected countries, and, where appropriate, in cooperation and coordination with regional and sub-regional organizations as well as international financial institutions. \\nIntegrated DDR also needs to be understood as a concrete and direct contribution to the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The SDGs are underpinned by the principle of leaving no one behind. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development explicitly links development to peace and security, while SDG 16 is \\nSDG 16.1: Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere. \\nSDG 16.4: By 2030, significantly reduce illicit financial and arms flows, strengthen the recovery and return of stolen assets and combat all forms of organized crime. \\nSDG 8.7: Take immediate steps to \u2026secure the prohibition and elimination of child labour, including recruitment and use of child soldiers, and by 2015 end child labour in all its forms. \\n\\nGender-responsive DDR also contributes to: \\nSDG 5.1: End all forms of discrimination against women. \\nSDG 5.2: Eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls in public and private spaces, including trafficking, sexual and other types of exploitation. \\nSDG 5.6: Ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights.", + "Paragraph": "The Sustaining Peace Approach \u2013 manifested in the General Assembly and Security Council twin resolutions on the Review of the United Nations Peacebuilding Architecture (General Assembly resolution 70\/262 and Security Council resolution 2282 [2016]) \u2013 underscores the mutually reinforcing relationship between prevention and sustaining peace, while recognizing that effective peacebuilding must involve the entire UN system. It also emphasizes the importance of joint analysis and effective strategic planning across the UN system in its long-term engagement with conflict-affected countries, and, where appropriate, in cooperation and coordination with regional and sub-regional organizations as well as international financial institutions. \nIntegrated DDR also needs to be understood as a concrete and direct contribution to the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The SDGs are underpinned by the principle of leaving no one behind. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development explicitly links development to peace and security, while SDG 16 is \nSDG 16.1: Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere. \nSDG 16.4: By 2030, significantly reduce illicit financial and arms flows, strengthen the recovery and return of stolen assets and combat all forms of organized crime. \nSDG 8.7: Take immediate steps to \u2026secure the prohibition and elimination of child labour, including recruitment and use of child soldiers, and by 2015 end child labour in all its forms. \n\nGender-responsive DDR also contributes to: \nSDG 5.1: End all forms of discrimination against women. \nSDG 5.2: Eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls in public and private spaces, including trafficking, sexual and other types of exploitation. \nSDG 5.6: Ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -11449,7 +11449,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 277, - "Paragraph": "The Sustaining Peace Approach \u2013 manifested in the General Assembly and Security Council twin resolutions on the Review of the United Nations Peacebuilding Architecture (General Assembly resolution 70\/262 and Security Council resolution 2282 [2016]) \u2013 underscores the mutually reinforcing relationship between prevention and sustaining peace, while recognizing that effective peacebuilding must involve the entire UN system. It also emphasizes the importance of joint analysis and effective strategic planning across the UN system in its long-term engagement with conflict-affected countries, and, where appropriate, in cooperation and coordination with regional and sub-regional organizations as well as international financial institutions. \\nIntegrated DDR also needs to be understood as a concrete and direct contribution to the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The SDGs are underpinned by the principle of leaving no one behind. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development explicitly links development to peace and security, while SDG 16 is \\nSDG 16.1: Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere. \\nSDG 16.4: By 2030, significantly reduce illicit financial and arms flows, strengthen the recovery and return of stolen assets and combat all forms of organized crime. \\nSDG 8.7: Take immediate steps to \u2026secure the prohibition and elimination of child labour, including recruitment and use of child soldiers, and by 2015 end child labour in all its forms. \\n\\nGender-responsive DDR also contributes to: \\nSDG 5.1: End all forms of discrimination against women. \\nSDG 5.2: Eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls in public and private spaces, including trafficking, sexual and other types of exploitation. \\nSDG 5.6: Ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights.", + "Paragraph": "The Sustaining Peace Approach \u2013 manifested in the General Assembly and Security Council twin resolutions on the Review of the United Nations Peacebuilding Architecture (General Assembly resolution 70\/262 and Security Council resolution 2282 [2016]) \u2013 underscores the mutually reinforcing relationship between prevention and sustaining peace, while recognizing that effective peacebuilding must involve the entire UN system. It also emphasizes the importance of joint analysis and effective strategic planning across the UN system in its long-term engagement with conflict-affected countries, and, where appropriate, in cooperation and coordination with regional and sub-regional organizations as well as international financial institutions. \nIntegrated DDR also needs to be understood as a concrete and direct contribution to the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The SDGs are underpinned by the principle of leaving no one behind. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development explicitly links development to peace and security, while SDG 16 is \nSDG 16.1: Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere. \nSDG 16.4: By 2030, significantly reduce illicit financial and arms flows, strengthen the recovery and return of stolen assets and combat all forms of organized crime. \nSDG 8.7: Take immediate steps to \u2026secure the prohibition and elimination of child labour, including recruitment and use of child soldiers, and by 2015 end child labour in all its forms. \n\nGender-responsive DDR also contributes to: \nSDG 5.1: End all forms of discrimination against women. \nSDG 5.2: Eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls in public and private spaces, including trafficking, sexual and other types of exploitation. \nSDG 5.6: Ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -11460,14 +11460,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development explicitly links development to peace and security, while SDG 16 is \\nSDG 16.1: Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere.", + "Sentence": "The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development explicitly links development to peace and security, while SDG 16 is \nSDG 16.1: Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere.", "newParagraph": "sustaining peace approach manifested general assembly security council twin resolution review united nation peacebuilding architecture general assembly resolution 70262 security council resolution 2282 2016 underscore mutually reinforcing relationship prevention sustaining peace recognizing effective peacebuilding must involve entire un system also emphasizes importance joint analysis effective strategic planning across un system longterm engagement conflictaffected country appropriate cooperation coordination regional subregional organization well international financial institution nintegrated ddr also need understood concrete direct contribution implementation sustainable development goal sdgs sdgs underpinned principle leaving one behind 2030 agenda sustainable development explicitly link development peace security sdg 16 nsdg 161 significantly reduce form violence related death rate everywhere nsdg 164 2030 significantly reduce illicit financial arm flow strengthen recovery return stolen asset combat form organized crime nsdg 87 take immediate step secure prohibition elimination child labour including recruitment use child soldier 2015 end child labour form nngenderresponsive ddr also contributes nsdg 51 end form discrimination woman nsdg 52 eliminate form violence woman girl public private space including trafficking sexual type exploitation nsdg 56 ensure universal access sexual reproductive health reproductive right", "ProcessedSent": "2030 agenda sustainable development explicitly link development peace security sdg 16 nsdg 161 significantly reduce form violence related death rate everywhere", "SentID": 636 }, { "ParagraphID": 277, - "Paragraph": "The Sustaining Peace Approach \u2013 manifested in the General Assembly and Security Council twin resolutions on the Review of the United Nations Peacebuilding Architecture (General Assembly resolution 70\/262 and Security Council resolution 2282 [2016]) \u2013 underscores the mutually reinforcing relationship between prevention and sustaining peace, while recognizing that effective peacebuilding must involve the entire UN system. It also emphasizes the importance of joint analysis and effective strategic planning across the UN system in its long-term engagement with conflict-affected countries, and, where appropriate, in cooperation and coordination with regional and sub-regional organizations as well as international financial institutions. \\nIntegrated DDR also needs to be understood as a concrete and direct contribution to the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The SDGs are underpinned by the principle of leaving no one behind. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development explicitly links development to peace and security, while SDG 16 is \\nSDG 16.1: Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere. \\nSDG 16.4: By 2030, significantly reduce illicit financial and arms flows, strengthen the recovery and return of stolen assets and combat all forms of organized crime. \\nSDG 8.7: Take immediate steps to \u2026secure the prohibition and elimination of child labour, including recruitment and use of child soldiers, and by 2015 end child labour in all its forms. \\n\\nGender-responsive DDR also contributes to: \\nSDG 5.1: End all forms of discrimination against women. \\nSDG 5.2: Eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls in public and private spaces, including trafficking, sexual and other types of exploitation. \\nSDG 5.6: Ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights.", + "Paragraph": "The Sustaining Peace Approach \u2013 manifested in the General Assembly and Security Council twin resolutions on the Review of the United Nations Peacebuilding Architecture (General Assembly resolution 70\/262 and Security Council resolution 2282 [2016]) \u2013 underscores the mutually reinforcing relationship between prevention and sustaining peace, while recognizing that effective peacebuilding must involve the entire UN system. It also emphasizes the importance of joint analysis and effective strategic planning across the UN system in its long-term engagement with conflict-affected countries, and, where appropriate, in cooperation and coordination with regional and sub-regional organizations as well as international financial institutions. \nIntegrated DDR also needs to be understood as a concrete and direct contribution to the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The SDGs are underpinned by the principle of leaving no one behind. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development explicitly links development to peace and security, while SDG 16 is \nSDG 16.1: Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere. \nSDG 16.4: By 2030, significantly reduce illicit financial and arms flows, strengthen the recovery and return of stolen assets and combat all forms of organized crime. \nSDG 8.7: Take immediate steps to \u2026secure the prohibition and elimination of child labour, including recruitment and use of child soldiers, and by 2015 end child labour in all its forms. \n\nGender-responsive DDR also contributes to: \nSDG 5.1: End all forms of discrimination against women. \nSDG 5.2: Eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls in public and private spaces, including trafficking, sexual and other types of exploitation. \nSDG 5.6: Ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -11478,14 +11478,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nSDG 16.4: By 2030, significantly reduce illicit financial and arms flows, strengthen the recovery and return of stolen assets and combat all forms of organized crime.", + "Sentence": "\nSDG 16.4: By 2030, significantly reduce illicit financial and arms flows, strengthen the recovery and return of stolen assets and combat all forms of organized crime.", "newParagraph": "sustaining peace approach manifested general assembly security council twin resolution review united nation peacebuilding architecture general assembly resolution 70262 security council resolution 2282 2016 underscore mutually reinforcing relationship prevention sustaining peace recognizing effective peacebuilding must involve entire un system also emphasizes importance joint analysis effective strategic planning across un system longterm engagement conflictaffected country appropriate cooperation coordination regional subregional organization well international financial institution nintegrated ddr also need understood concrete direct contribution implementation sustainable development goal sdgs sdgs underpinned principle leaving one behind 2030 agenda sustainable development explicitly link development peace security sdg 16 nsdg 161 significantly reduce form violence related death rate everywhere nsdg 164 2030 significantly reduce illicit financial arm flow strengthen recovery return stolen asset combat form organized crime nsdg 87 take immediate step secure prohibition elimination child labour including recruitment use child soldier 2015 end child labour form nngenderresponsive ddr also contributes nsdg 51 end form discrimination woman nsdg 52 eliminate form violence woman girl public private space including trafficking sexual type exploitation nsdg 56 ensure universal access sexual reproductive health reproductive right", "ProcessedSent": "nsdg 164 2030 significantly reduce illicit financial arm flow strengthen recovery return stolen asset combat form organized crime", "SentID": 637 }, { "ParagraphID": 277, - "Paragraph": "The Sustaining Peace Approach \u2013 manifested in the General Assembly and Security Council twin resolutions on the Review of the United Nations Peacebuilding Architecture (General Assembly resolution 70\/262 and Security Council resolution 2282 [2016]) \u2013 underscores the mutually reinforcing relationship between prevention and sustaining peace, while recognizing that effective peacebuilding must involve the entire UN system. It also emphasizes the importance of joint analysis and effective strategic planning across the UN system in its long-term engagement with conflict-affected countries, and, where appropriate, in cooperation and coordination with regional and sub-regional organizations as well as international financial institutions. \\nIntegrated DDR also needs to be understood as a concrete and direct contribution to the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The SDGs are underpinned by the principle of leaving no one behind. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development explicitly links development to peace and security, while SDG 16 is \\nSDG 16.1: Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere. \\nSDG 16.4: By 2030, significantly reduce illicit financial and arms flows, strengthen the recovery and return of stolen assets and combat all forms of organized crime. \\nSDG 8.7: Take immediate steps to \u2026secure the prohibition and elimination of child labour, including recruitment and use of child soldiers, and by 2015 end child labour in all its forms. \\n\\nGender-responsive DDR also contributes to: \\nSDG 5.1: End all forms of discrimination against women. \\nSDG 5.2: Eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls in public and private spaces, including trafficking, sexual and other types of exploitation. \\nSDG 5.6: Ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights.", + "Paragraph": "The Sustaining Peace Approach \u2013 manifested in the General Assembly and Security Council twin resolutions on the Review of the United Nations Peacebuilding Architecture (General Assembly resolution 70\/262 and Security Council resolution 2282 [2016]) \u2013 underscores the mutually reinforcing relationship between prevention and sustaining peace, while recognizing that effective peacebuilding must involve the entire UN system. It also emphasizes the importance of joint analysis and effective strategic planning across the UN system in its long-term engagement with conflict-affected countries, and, where appropriate, in cooperation and coordination with regional and sub-regional organizations as well as international financial institutions. \nIntegrated DDR also needs to be understood as a concrete and direct contribution to the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The SDGs are underpinned by the principle of leaving no one behind. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development explicitly links development to peace and security, while SDG 16 is \nSDG 16.1: Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere. \nSDG 16.4: By 2030, significantly reduce illicit financial and arms flows, strengthen the recovery and return of stolen assets and combat all forms of organized crime. \nSDG 8.7: Take immediate steps to \u2026secure the prohibition and elimination of child labour, including recruitment and use of child soldiers, and by 2015 end child labour in all its forms. \n\nGender-responsive DDR also contributes to: \nSDG 5.1: End all forms of discrimination against women. \nSDG 5.2: Eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls in public and private spaces, including trafficking, sexual and other types of exploitation. \nSDG 5.6: Ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -11496,14 +11496,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nSDG 8.7: Take immediate steps to \u2026secure the prohibition and elimination of child labour, including recruitment and use of child soldiers, and by 2015 end child labour in all its forms.", + "Sentence": "\nSDG 8.7: Take immediate steps to \u2026secure the prohibition and elimination of child labour, including recruitment and use of child soldiers, and by 2015 end child labour in all its forms.", "newParagraph": "sustaining peace approach manifested general assembly security council twin resolution review united nation peacebuilding architecture general assembly resolution 70262 security council resolution 2282 2016 underscore mutually reinforcing relationship prevention sustaining peace recognizing effective peacebuilding must involve entire un system also emphasizes importance joint analysis effective strategic planning across un system longterm engagement conflictaffected country appropriate cooperation coordination regional subregional organization well international financial institution nintegrated ddr also need understood concrete direct contribution implementation sustainable development goal sdgs sdgs underpinned principle leaving one behind 2030 agenda sustainable development explicitly link development peace security sdg 16 nsdg 161 significantly reduce form violence related death rate everywhere nsdg 164 2030 significantly reduce illicit financial arm flow strengthen recovery return stolen asset combat form organized crime nsdg 87 take immediate step secure prohibition elimination child labour including recruitment use child soldier 2015 end child labour form nngenderresponsive ddr also contributes nsdg 51 end form discrimination woman nsdg 52 eliminate form violence woman girl public private space including trafficking sexual type exploitation nsdg 56 ensure universal access sexual reproductive health reproductive right", "ProcessedSent": "nsdg 87 take immediate step secure prohibition elimination child labour including recruitment use child soldier 2015 end child labour form", "SentID": 638 }, { "ParagraphID": 277, - "Paragraph": "The Sustaining Peace Approach \u2013 manifested in the General Assembly and Security Council twin resolutions on the Review of the United Nations Peacebuilding Architecture (General Assembly resolution 70\/262 and Security Council resolution 2282 [2016]) \u2013 underscores the mutually reinforcing relationship between prevention and sustaining peace, while recognizing that effective peacebuilding must involve the entire UN system. It also emphasizes the importance of joint analysis and effective strategic planning across the UN system in its long-term engagement with conflict-affected countries, and, where appropriate, in cooperation and coordination with regional and sub-regional organizations as well as international financial institutions. \\nIntegrated DDR also needs to be understood as a concrete and direct contribution to the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The SDGs are underpinned by the principle of leaving no one behind. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development explicitly links development to peace and security, while SDG 16 is \\nSDG 16.1: Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere. \\nSDG 16.4: By 2030, significantly reduce illicit financial and arms flows, strengthen the recovery and return of stolen assets and combat all forms of organized crime. \\nSDG 8.7: Take immediate steps to \u2026secure the prohibition and elimination of child labour, including recruitment and use of child soldiers, and by 2015 end child labour in all its forms. \\n\\nGender-responsive DDR also contributes to: \\nSDG 5.1: End all forms of discrimination against women. \\nSDG 5.2: Eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls in public and private spaces, including trafficking, sexual and other types of exploitation. \\nSDG 5.6: Ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights.", + "Paragraph": "The Sustaining Peace Approach \u2013 manifested in the General Assembly and Security Council twin resolutions on the Review of the United Nations Peacebuilding Architecture (General Assembly resolution 70\/262 and Security Council resolution 2282 [2016]) \u2013 underscores the mutually reinforcing relationship between prevention and sustaining peace, while recognizing that effective peacebuilding must involve the entire UN system. It also emphasizes the importance of joint analysis and effective strategic planning across the UN system in its long-term engagement with conflict-affected countries, and, where appropriate, in cooperation and coordination with regional and sub-regional organizations as well as international financial institutions. \nIntegrated DDR also needs to be understood as a concrete and direct contribution to the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The SDGs are underpinned by the principle of leaving no one behind. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development explicitly links development to peace and security, while SDG 16 is \nSDG 16.1: Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere. \nSDG 16.4: By 2030, significantly reduce illicit financial and arms flows, strengthen the recovery and return of stolen assets and combat all forms of organized crime. \nSDG 8.7: Take immediate steps to \u2026secure the prohibition and elimination of child labour, including recruitment and use of child soldiers, and by 2015 end child labour in all its forms. \n\nGender-responsive DDR also contributes to: \nSDG 5.1: End all forms of discrimination against women. \nSDG 5.2: Eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls in public and private spaces, including trafficking, sexual and other types of exploitation. \nSDG 5.6: Ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -11514,14 +11514,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\nGender-responsive DDR also contributes to: \\nSDG 5.1: End all forms of discrimination against women.", + "Sentence": "\n\nGender-responsive DDR also contributes to: \nSDG 5.1: End all forms of discrimination against women.", "newParagraph": "sustaining peace approach manifested general assembly security council twin resolution review united nation peacebuilding architecture general assembly resolution 70262 security council resolution 2282 2016 underscore mutually reinforcing relationship prevention sustaining peace recognizing effective peacebuilding must involve entire un system also emphasizes importance joint analysis effective strategic planning across un system longterm engagement conflictaffected country appropriate cooperation coordination regional subregional organization well international financial institution nintegrated ddr also need understood concrete direct contribution implementation sustainable development goal sdgs sdgs underpinned principle leaving one behind 2030 agenda sustainable development explicitly link development peace security sdg 16 nsdg 161 significantly reduce form violence related death rate everywhere nsdg 164 2030 significantly reduce illicit financial arm flow strengthen recovery return stolen asset combat form organized crime nsdg 87 take immediate step secure prohibition elimination child labour including recruitment use child soldier 2015 end child labour form nngenderresponsive ddr also contributes nsdg 51 end form discrimination woman nsdg 52 eliminate form violence woman girl public private space including trafficking sexual type exploitation nsdg 56 ensure universal access sexual reproductive health reproductive right", "ProcessedSent": "nngenderresponsive ddr also contributes nsdg 51 end form discrimination woman", "SentID": 639 }, { "ParagraphID": 277, - "Paragraph": "The Sustaining Peace Approach \u2013 manifested in the General Assembly and Security Council twin resolutions on the Review of the United Nations Peacebuilding Architecture (General Assembly resolution 70\/262 and Security Council resolution 2282 [2016]) \u2013 underscores the mutually reinforcing relationship between prevention and sustaining peace, while recognizing that effective peacebuilding must involve the entire UN system. It also emphasizes the importance of joint analysis and effective strategic planning across the UN system in its long-term engagement with conflict-affected countries, and, where appropriate, in cooperation and coordination with regional and sub-regional organizations as well as international financial institutions. \\nIntegrated DDR also needs to be understood as a concrete and direct contribution to the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The SDGs are underpinned by the principle of leaving no one behind. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development explicitly links development to peace and security, while SDG 16 is \\nSDG 16.1: Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere. \\nSDG 16.4: By 2030, significantly reduce illicit financial and arms flows, strengthen the recovery and return of stolen assets and combat all forms of organized crime. \\nSDG 8.7: Take immediate steps to \u2026secure the prohibition and elimination of child labour, including recruitment and use of child soldiers, and by 2015 end child labour in all its forms. \\n\\nGender-responsive DDR also contributes to: \\nSDG 5.1: End all forms of discrimination against women. \\nSDG 5.2: Eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls in public and private spaces, including trafficking, sexual and other types of exploitation. \\nSDG 5.6: Ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights.", + "Paragraph": "The Sustaining Peace Approach \u2013 manifested in the General Assembly and Security Council twin resolutions on the Review of the United Nations Peacebuilding Architecture (General Assembly resolution 70\/262 and Security Council resolution 2282 [2016]) \u2013 underscores the mutually reinforcing relationship between prevention and sustaining peace, while recognizing that effective peacebuilding must involve the entire UN system. It also emphasizes the importance of joint analysis and effective strategic planning across the UN system in its long-term engagement with conflict-affected countries, and, where appropriate, in cooperation and coordination with regional and sub-regional organizations as well as international financial institutions. \nIntegrated DDR also needs to be understood as a concrete and direct contribution to the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The SDGs are underpinned by the principle of leaving no one behind. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development explicitly links development to peace and security, while SDG 16 is \nSDG 16.1: Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere. \nSDG 16.4: By 2030, significantly reduce illicit financial and arms flows, strengthen the recovery and return of stolen assets and combat all forms of organized crime. \nSDG 8.7: Take immediate steps to \u2026secure the prohibition and elimination of child labour, including recruitment and use of child soldiers, and by 2015 end child labour in all its forms. \n\nGender-responsive DDR also contributes to: \nSDG 5.1: End all forms of discrimination against women. \nSDG 5.2: Eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls in public and private spaces, including trafficking, sexual and other types of exploitation. \nSDG 5.6: Ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -11532,14 +11532,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nSDG 5.2: Eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls in public and private spaces, including trafficking, sexual and other types of exploitation.", + "Sentence": "\nSDG 5.2: Eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls in public and private spaces, including trafficking, sexual and other types of exploitation.", "newParagraph": "sustaining peace approach manifested general assembly security council twin resolution review united nation peacebuilding architecture general assembly resolution 70262 security council resolution 2282 2016 underscore mutually reinforcing relationship prevention sustaining peace recognizing effective peacebuilding must involve entire un system also emphasizes importance joint analysis effective strategic planning across un system longterm engagement conflictaffected country appropriate cooperation coordination regional subregional organization well international financial institution nintegrated ddr also need understood concrete direct contribution implementation sustainable development goal sdgs sdgs underpinned principle leaving one behind 2030 agenda sustainable development explicitly link development peace security sdg 16 nsdg 161 significantly reduce form violence related death rate everywhere nsdg 164 2030 significantly reduce illicit financial arm flow strengthen recovery return stolen asset combat form organized crime nsdg 87 take immediate step secure prohibition elimination child labour including recruitment use child soldier 2015 end child labour form nngenderresponsive ddr also contributes nsdg 51 end form discrimination woman nsdg 52 eliminate form violence woman girl public private space including trafficking sexual type exploitation nsdg 56 ensure universal access sexual reproductive health reproductive right", "ProcessedSent": "nsdg 52 eliminate form violence woman girl public private space including trafficking sexual type exploitation", "SentID": 640 }, { "ParagraphID": 277, - "Paragraph": "The Sustaining Peace Approach \u2013 manifested in the General Assembly and Security Council twin resolutions on the Review of the United Nations Peacebuilding Architecture (General Assembly resolution 70\/262 and Security Council resolution 2282 [2016]) \u2013 underscores the mutually reinforcing relationship between prevention and sustaining peace, while recognizing that effective peacebuilding must involve the entire UN system. It also emphasizes the importance of joint analysis and effective strategic planning across the UN system in its long-term engagement with conflict-affected countries, and, where appropriate, in cooperation and coordination with regional and sub-regional organizations as well as international financial institutions. \\nIntegrated DDR also needs to be understood as a concrete and direct contribution to the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The SDGs are underpinned by the principle of leaving no one behind. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development explicitly links development to peace and security, while SDG 16 is \\nSDG 16.1: Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere. \\nSDG 16.4: By 2030, significantly reduce illicit financial and arms flows, strengthen the recovery and return of stolen assets and combat all forms of organized crime. \\nSDG 8.7: Take immediate steps to \u2026secure the prohibition and elimination of child labour, including recruitment and use of child soldiers, and by 2015 end child labour in all its forms. \\n\\nGender-responsive DDR also contributes to: \\nSDG 5.1: End all forms of discrimination against women. \\nSDG 5.2: Eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls in public and private spaces, including trafficking, sexual and other types of exploitation. \\nSDG 5.6: Ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights.", + "Paragraph": "The Sustaining Peace Approach \u2013 manifested in the General Assembly and Security Council twin resolutions on the Review of the United Nations Peacebuilding Architecture (General Assembly resolution 70\/262 and Security Council resolution 2282 [2016]) \u2013 underscores the mutually reinforcing relationship between prevention and sustaining peace, while recognizing that effective peacebuilding must involve the entire UN system. It also emphasizes the importance of joint analysis and effective strategic planning across the UN system in its long-term engagement with conflict-affected countries, and, where appropriate, in cooperation and coordination with regional and sub-regional organizations as well as international financial institutions. \nIntegrated DDR also needs to be understood as a concrete and direct contribution to the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The SDGs are underpinned by the principle of leaving no one behind. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development explicitly links development to peace and security, while SDG 16 is \nSDG 16.1: Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere. \nSDG 16.4: By 2030, significantly reduce illicit financial and arms flows, strengthen the recovery and return of stolen assets and combat all forms of organized crime. \nSDG 8.7: Take immediate steps to \u2026secure the prohibition and elimination of child labour, including recruitment and use of child soldiers, and by 2015 end child labour in all its forms. \n\nGender-responsive DDR also contributes to: \nSDG 5.1: End all forms of discrimination against women. \nSDG 5.2: Eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls in public and private spaces, including trafficking, sexual and other types of exploitation. \nSDG 5.6: Ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -11550,7 +11550,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nSDG 5.6: Ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights.", + "Sentence": "\nSDG 5.6: Ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights.", "newParagraph": "sustaining peace approach manifested general assembly security council twin resolution review united nation peacebuilding architecture general assembly resolution 70262 security council resolution 2282 2016 underscore mutually reinforcing relationship prevention sustaining peace recognizing effective peacebuilding must involve entire un system also emphasizes importance joint analysis effective strategic planning across un system longterm engagement conflictaffected country appropriate cooperation coordination regional subregional organization well international financial institution nintegrated ddr also need understood concrete direct contribution implementation sustainable development goal sdgs sdgs underpinned principle leaving one behind 2030 agenda sustainable development explicitly link development peace security sdg 16 nsdg 161 significantly reduce form violence related death rate everywhere nsdg 164 2030 significantly reduce illicit financial arm flow strengthen recovery return stolen asset combat form organized crime nsdg 87 take immediate step secure prohibition elimination child labour including recruitment use child soldier 2015 end child labour form nngenderresponsive ddr also contributes nsdg 51 end form discrimination woman nsdg 52 eliminate form violence woman girl public private space including trafficking sexual type exploitation nsdg 56 ensure universal access sexual reproductive health reproductive right", "ProcessedSent": "nsdg 56 ensure universal access sexual reproductive health reproductive right", "SentID": 641 @@ -12151,7 +12151,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 289, - "Paragraph": "DDR programmes are complex endeavours, with political, military, security, humanitarian and socio-economic dimensions. The establishment of a DDR programme is usually agreed to and defined within a ceasefire, the ending of hostilities or a comprehensive peace agreement. This provides the political, policy and operational framework for the DDR programme. More generally, lessons and experiences have shown that the following preconditions are required for the implementation of a viable DDR programme: \\nthe signing of a negotiated ceasefire and\/or peace agreement that provides the framework for \\nDDR; \\ntrust in the peace process; \\nwillingness of the parties to the armed conflict to engage in DDR; and \\na minimum guarantee of security.", + "Paragraph": "DDR programmes are complex endeavours, with political, military, security, humanitarian and socio-economic dimensions. The establishment of a DDR programme is usually agreed to and defined within a ceasefire, the ending of hostilities or a comprehensive peace agreement. This provides the political, policy and operational framework for the DDR programme. More generally, lessons and experiences have shown that the following preconditions are required for the implementation of a viable DDR programme: \nthe signing of a negotiated ceasefire and\/or peace agreement that provides the framework for \nDDR; \ntrust in the peace process; \nwillingness of the parties to the armed conflict to engage in DDR; and \na minimum guarantee of security.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -12169,7 +12169,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 289, - "Paragraph": "DDR programmes are complex endeavours, with political, military, security, humanitarian and socio-economic dimensions. The establishment of a DDR programme is usually agreed to and defined within a ceasefire, the ending of hostilities or a comprehensive peace agreement. This provides the political, policy and operational framework for the DDR programme. More generally, lessons and experiences have shown that the following preconditions are required for the implementation of a viable DDR programme: \\nthe signing of a negotiated ceasefire and\/or peace agreement that provides the framework for \\nDDR; \\ntrust in the peace process; \\nwillingness of the parties to the armed conflict to engage in DDR; and \\na minimum guarantee of security.", + "Paragraph": "DDR programmes are complex endeavours, with political, military, security, humanitarian and socio-economic dimensions. The establishment of a DDR programme is usually agreed to and defined within a ceasefire, the ending of hostilities or a comprehensive peace agreement. This provides the political, policy and operational framework for the DDR programme. More generally, lessons and experiences have shown that the following preconditions are required for the implementation of a viable DDR programme: \nthe signing of a negotiated ceasefire and\/or peace agreement that provides the framework for \nDDR; \ntrust in the peace process; \nwillingness of the parties to the armed conflict to engage in DDR; and \na minimum guarantee of security.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -12187,7 +12187,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 289, - "Paragraph": "DDR programmes are complex endeavours, with political, military, security, humanitarian and socio-economic dimensions. The establishment of a DDR programme is usually agreed to and defined within a ceasefire, the ending of hostilities or a comprehensive peace agreement. This provides the political, policy and operational framework for the DDR programme. More generally, lessons and experiences have shown that the following preconditions are required for the implementation of a viable DDR programme: \\nthe signing of a negotiated ceasefire and\/or peace agreement that provides the framework for \\nDDR; \\ntrust in the peace process; \\nwillingness of the parties to the armed conflict to engage in DDR; and \\na minimum guarantee of security.", + "Paragraph": "DDR programmes are complex endeavours, with political, military, security, humanitarian and socio-economic dimensions. The establishment of a DDR programme is usually agreed to and defined within a ceasefire, the ending of hostilities or a comprehensive peace agreement. This provides the political, policy and operational framework for the DDR programme. More generally, lessons and experiences have shown that the following preconditions are required for the implementation of a viable DDR programme: \nthe signing of a negotiated ceasefire and\/or peace agreement that provides the framework for \nDDR; \ntrust in the peace process; \nwillingness of the parties to the armed conflict to engage in DDR; and \na minimum guarantee of security.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -12205,7 +12205,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 289, - "Paragraph": "DDR programmes are complex endeavours, with political, military, security, humanitarian and socio-economic dimensions. The establishment of a DDR programme is usually agreed to and defined within a ceasefire, the ending of hostilities or a comprehensive peace agreement. This provides the political, policy and operational framework for the DDR programme. More generally, lessons and experiences have shown that the following preconditions are required for the implementation of a viable DDR programme: \\nthe signing of a negotiated ceasefire and\/or peace agreement that provides the framework for \\nDDR; \\ntrust in the peace process; \\nwillingness of the parties to the armed conflict to engage in DDR; and \\na minimum guarantee of security.", + "Paragraph": "DDR programmes are complex endeavours, with political, military, security, humanitarian and socio-economic dimensions. The establishment of a DDR programme is usually agreed to and defined within a ceasefire, the ending of hostilities or a comprehensive peace agreement. This provides the political, policy and operational framework for the DDR programme. More generally, lessons and experiences have shown that the following preconditions are required for the implementation of a viable DDR programme: \nthe signing of a negotiated ceasefire and\/or peace agreement that provides the framework for \nDDR; \ntrust in the peace process; \nwillingness of the parties to the armed conflict to engage in DDR; and \na minimum guarantee of security.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -12216,7 +12216,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "More generally, lessons and experiences have shown that the following preconditions are required for the implementation of a viable DDR programme: \\nthe signing of a negotiated ceasefire and\/or peace agreement that provides the framework for \\nDDR; \\ntrust in the peace process; \\nwillingness of the parties to the armed conflict to engage in DDR; and \\na minimum guarantee of security.", + "Sentence": "More generally, lessons and experiences have shown that the following preconditions are required for the implementation of a viable DDR programme: \nthe signing of a negotiated ceasefire and\/or peace agreement that provides the framework for \nDDR; \ntrust in the peace process; \nwillingness of the parties to the armed conflict to engage in DDR; and \na minimum guarantee of security.", "newParagraph": "ddr programme complex endeavour political military security humanitarian socioeconomic dimension establishment ddr programme usually agreed defined within ceasefire ending hostility comprehensive peace agreement provides political policy operational framework ddr programme generally lesson experience shown following precondition required implementation viable ddr programme nthe signing negotiated ceasefire andor peace agreement provides framework nddr ntrust peace process nwillingness party armed conflict engage ddr na minimum guarantee security", "ProcessedSent": "generally lesson experience shown following precondition required implementation viable ddr programme nthe signing negotiated ceasefire andor peace agreement provides framework nddr ntrust peace process nwillingness party armed conflict engage ddr na minimum guarantee security", "SentID": 678 @@ -13699,7 +13699,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 317, - "Paragraph": "The UN may employ or support a variety of DDR programming elements adapted to suit each context. These may include: \\nThe disbanding of armed groups: Governments may request assistance to disband armed groups. The establishment of a DDR programme is agreed to and defined within a ceasefire, the ending of hostilities or a comprehensive peace agreement. Trust and commitment by the parties to the implementation of an agreement and minimum conditions of security are essential for the success of a DDR programme. Administratively, there is little difference between DDR programmes for armed forces and armed groups. Both may require the full registration of weapons and personnel, followed by the collection of information, referral and counselling that are needed before effective reintegration programmes can be put in place. \\nThe rightsizing of armed forces or police: Governments may request assistance to downsize or restructure their armies or police and supporting institutional infrastructure (salaries, benefits, basic services, etc.). Such processes contribute to security sector reform (SSR) (see IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform). DDR practitioners should work in close collaboration with SSR experts while planning reintegration support to former members of armed forces. \\nThe repatriation of foreign combatants and associated groups: Considering the regional dimensions of conflict, Governments may agree to assistance to repatriation. DDR programmes may need to become involved in repatriating national combatants and their civilian family members, as well as children associated with armed forces and groups who may have crossed an international border. Such repatriation needs to be in accordance with the principle of non-refoulement, as set out in international humanitarian, human rights and refugee law (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", + "Paragraph": "The UN may employ or support a variety of DDR programming elements adapted to suit each context. These may include: \nThe disbanding of armed groups: Governments may request assistance to disband armed groups. The establishment of a DDR programme is agreed to and defined within a ceasefire, the ending of hostilities or a comprehensive peace agreement. Trust and commitment by the parties to the implementation of an agreement and minimum conditions of security are essential for the success of a DDR programme. Administratively, there is little difference between DDR programmes for armed forces and armed groups. Both may require the full registration of weapons and personnel, followed by the collection of information, referral and counselling that are needed before effective reintegration programmes can be put in place. \nThe rightsizing of armed forces or police: Governments may request assistance to downsize or restructure their armies or police and supporting institutional infrastructure (salaries, benefits, basic services, etc.). Such processes contribute to security sector reform (SSR) (see IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform). DDR practitioners should work in close collaboration with SSR experts while planning reintegration support to former members of armed forces. \nThe repatriation of foreign combatants and associated groups: Considering the regional dimensions of conflict, Governments may agree to assistance to repatriation. DDR programmes may need to become involved in repatriating national combatants and their civilian family members, as well as children associated with armed forces and groups who may have crossed an international border. Such repatriation needs to be in accordance with the principle of non-refoulement, as set out in international humanitarian, human rights and refugee law (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -13717,7 +13717,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 317, - "Paragraph": "The UN may employ or support a variety of DDR programming elements adapted to suit each context. These may include: \\nThe disbanding of armed groups: Governments may request assistance to disband armed groups. The establishment of a DDR programme is agreed to and defined within a ceasefire, the ending of hostilities or a comprehensive peace agreement. Trust and commitment by the parties to the implementation of an agreement and minimum conditions of security are essential for the success of a DDR programme. Administratively, there is little difference between DDR programmes for armed forces and armed groups. Both may require the full registration of weapons and personnel, followed by the collection of information, referral and counselling that are needed before effective reintegration programmes can be put in place. \\nThe rightsizing of armed forces or police: Governments may request assistance to downsize or restructure their armies or police and supporting institutional infrastructure (salaries, benefits, basic services, etc.). Such processes contribute to security sector reform (SSR) (see IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform). DDR practitioners should work in close collaboration with SSR experts while planning reintegration support to former members of armed forces. \\nThe repatriation of foreign combatants and associated groups: Considering the regional dimensions of conflict, Governments may agree to assistance to repatriation. DDR programmes may need to become involved in repatriating national combatants and their civilian family members, as well as children associated with armed forces and groups who may have crossed an international border. Such repatriation needs to be in accordance with the principle of non-refoulement, as set out in international humanitarian, human rights and refugee law (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", + "Paragraph": "The UN may employ or support a variety of DDR programming elements adapted to suit each context. These may include: \nThe disbanding of armed groups: Governments may request assistance to disband armed groups. The establishment of a DDR programme is agreed to and defined within a ceasefire, the ending of hostilities or a comprehensive peace agreement. Trust and commitment by the parties to the implementation of an agreement and minimum conditions of security are essential for the success of a DDR programme. Administratively, there is little difference between DDR programmes for armed forces and armed groups. Both may require the full registration of weapons and personnel, followed by the collection of information, referral and counselling that are needed before effective reintegration programmes can be put in place. \nThe rightsizing of armed forces or police: Governments may request assistance to downsize or restructure their armies or police and supporting institutional infrastructure (salaries, benefits, basic services, etc.). Such processes contribute to security sector reform (SSR) (see IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform). DDR practitioners should work in close collaboration with SSR experts while planning reintegration support to former members of armed forces. \nThe repatriation of foreign combatants and associated groups: Considering the regional dimensions of conflict, Governments may agree to assistance to repatriation. DDR programmes may need to become involved in repatriating national combatants and their civilian family members, as well as children associated with armed forces and groups who may have crossed an international border. Such repatriation needs to be in accordance with the principle of non-refoulement, as set out in international humanitarian, human rights and refugee law (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -13728,14 +13728,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "These may include: \\nThe disbanding of armed groups: Governments may request assistance to disband armed groups.", + "Sentence": "These may include: \nThe disbanding of armed groups: Governments may request assistance to disband armed groups.", "newParagraph": "un may employ support variety ddr programming element adapted suit context may include nthe disbanding armed group government may request assistance disband armed group establishment ddr programme agreed defined within ceasefire ending hostility comprehensive peace agreement trust commitment party implementation agreement minimum condition security essential success ddr programme administratively little difference ddr programme armed force armed group may require full registration weapon personnel followed collection information referral counselling needed effective reintegration programme put place nthe rightsizing armed force police government may request assistance downsize restructure army police supporting institutional infrastructure salary benefit basic service etc process contribute security sector reform ssr see iddrs 610 ddr security sector reform ddr practitioner work close collaboration ssr expert planning reintegration support former member armed force nthe repatriation foreign combatant associated group considering regional dimension conflict government may agree assistance repatriation ddr programme may need become involved repatriating national combatant civilian family member well child associated armed force group may crossed international border repatriation need accordance principle nonrefoulement set international humanitarian human right refugee law see iddrs 211 legal framework un ddr", "ProcessedSent": "may include nthe disbanding armed group government may request assistance disband armed group", "SentID": 762 }, { "ParagraphID": 317, - "Paragraph": "The UN may employ or support a variety of DDR programming elements adapted to suit each context. These may include: \\nThe disbanding of armed groups: Governments may request assistance to disband armed groups. The establishment of a DDR programme is agreed to and defined within a ceasefire, the ending of hostilities or a comprehensive peace agreement. Trust and commitment by the parties to the implementation of an agreement and minimum conditions of security are essential for the success of a DDR programme. Administratively, there is little difference between DDR programmes for armed forces and armed groups. Both may require the full registration of weapons and personnel, followed by the collection of information, referral and counselling that are needed before effective reintegration programmes can be put in place. \\nThe rightsizing of armed forces or police: Governments may request assistance to downsize or restructure their armies or police and supporting institutional infrastructure (salaries, benefits, basic services, etc.). Such processes contribute to security sector reform (SSR) (see IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform). DDR practitioners should work in close collaboration with SSR experts while planning reintegration support to former members of armed forces. \\nThe repatriation of foreign combatants and associated groups: Considering the regional dimensions of conflict, Governments may agree to assistance to repatriation. DDR programmes may need to become involved in repatriating national combatants and their civilian family members, as well as children associated with armed forces and groups who may have crossed an international border. Such repatriation needs to be in accordance with the principle of non-refoulement, as set out in international humanitarian, human rights and refugee law (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", + "Paragraph": "The UN may employ or support a variety of DDR programming elements adapted to suit each context. These may include: \nThe disbanding of armed groups: Governments may request assistance to disband armed groups. The establishment of a DDR programme is agreed to and defined within a ceasefire, the ending of hostilities or a comprehensive peace agreement. Trust and commitment by the parties to the implementation of an agreement and minimum conditions of security are essential for the success of a DDR programme. Administratively, there is little difference between DDR programmes for armed forces and armed groups. Both may require the full registration of weapons and personnel, followed by the collection of information, referral and counselling that are needed before effective reintegration programmes can be put in place. \nThe rightsizing of armed forces or police: Governments may request assistance to downsize or restructure their armies or police and supporting institutional infrastructure (salaries, benefits, basic services, etc.). Such processes contribute to security sector reform (SSR) (see IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform). DDR practitioners should work in close collaboration with SSR experts while planning reintegration support to former members of armed forces. \nThe repatriation of foreign combatants and associated groups: Considering the regional dimensions of conflict, Governments may agree to assistance to repatriation. DDR programmes may need to become involved in repatriating national combatants and their civilian family members, as well as children associated with armed forces and groups who may have crossed an international border. Such repatriation needs to be in accordance with the principle of non-refoulement, as set out in international humanitarian, human rights and refugee law (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -13753,7 +13753,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 317, - "Paragraph": "The UN may employ or support a variety of DDR programming elements adapted to suit each context. These may include: \\nThe disbanding of armed groups: Governments may request assistance to disband armed groups. The establishment of a DDR programme is agreed to and defined within a ceasefire, the ending of hostilities or a comprehensive peace agreement. Trust and commitment by the parties to the implementation of an agreement and minimum conditions of security are essential for the success of a DDR programme. Administratively, there is little difference between DDR programmes for armed forces and armed groups. Both may require the full registration of weapons and personnel, followed by the collection of information, referral and counselling that are needed before effective reintegration programmes can be put in place. \\nThe rightsizing of armed forces or police: Governments may request assistance to downsize or restructure their armies or police and supporting institutional infrastructure (salaries, benefits, basic services, etc.). Such processes contribute to security sector reform (SSR) (see IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform). DDR practitioners should work in close collaboration with SSR experts while planning reintegration support to former members of armed forces. \\nThe repatriation of foreign combatants and associated groups: Considering the regional dimensions of conflict, Governments may agree to assistance to repatriation. DDR programmes may need to become involved in repatriating national combatants and their civilian family members, as well as children associated with armed forces and groups who may have crossed an international border. Such repatriation needs to be in accordance with the principle of non-refoulement, as set out in international humanitarian, human rights and refugee law (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", + "Paragraph": "The UN may employ or support a variety of DDR programming elements adapted to suit each context. These may include: \nThe disbanding of armed groups: Governments may request assistance to disband armed groups. The establishment of a DDR programme is agreed to and defined within a ceasefire, the ending of hostilities or a comprehensive peace agreement. Trust and commitment by the parties to the implementation of an agreement and minimum conditions of security are essential for the success of a DDR programme. Administratively, there is little difference between DDR programmes for armed forces and armed groups. Both may require the full registration of weapons and personnel, followed by the collection of information, referral and counselling that are needed before effective reintegration programmes can be put in place. \nThe rightsizing of armed forces or police: Governments may request assistance to downsize or restructure their armies or police and supporting institutional infrastructure (salaries, benefits, basic services, etc.). Such processes contribute to security sector reform (SSR) (see IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform). DDR practitioners should work in close collaboration with SSR experts while planning reintegration support to former members of armed forces. \nThe repatriation of foreign combatants and associated groups: Considering the regional dimensions of conflict, Governments may agree to assistance to repatriation. DDR programmes may need to become involved in repatriating national combatants and their civilian family members, as well as children associated with armed forces and groups who may have crossed an international border. Such repatriation needs to be in accordance with the principle of non-refoulement, as set out in international humanitarian, human rights and refugee law (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -13771,7 +13771,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 317, - "Paragraph": "The UN may employ or support a variety of DDR programming elements adapted to suit each context. These may include: \\nThe disbanding of armed groups: Governments may request assistance to disband armed groups. The establishment of a DDR programme is agreed to and defined within a ceasefire, the ending of hostilities or a comprehensive peace agreement. Trust and commitment by the parties to the implementation of an agreement and minimum conditions of security are essential for the success of a DDR programme. Administratively, there is little difference between DDR programmes for armed forces and armed groups. Both may require the full registration of weapons and personnel, followed by the collection of information, referral and counselling that are needed before effective reintegration programmes can be put in place. \\nThe rightsizing of armed forces or police: Governments may request assistance to downsize or restructure their armies or police and supporting institutional infrastructure (salaries, benefits, basic services, etc.). Such processes contribute to security sector reform (SSR) (see IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform). DDR practitioners should work in close collaboration with SSR experts while planning reintegration support to former members of armed forces. \\nThe repatriation of foreign combatants and associated groups: Considering the regional dimensions of conflict, Governments may agree to assistance to repatriation. DDR programmes may need to become involved in repatriating national combatants and their civilian family members, as well as children associated with armed forces and groups who may have crossed an international border. Such repatriation needs to be in accordance with the principle of non-refoulement, as set out in international humanitarian, human rights and refugee law (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", + "Paragraph": "The UN may employ or support a variety of DDR programming elements adapted to suit each context. These may include: \nThe disbanding of armed groups: Governments may request assistance to disband armed groups. The establishment of a DDR programme is agreed to and defined within a ceasefire, the ending of hostilities or a comprehensive peace agreement. Trust and commitment by the parties to the implementation of an agreement and minimum conditions of security are essential for the success of a DDR programme. Administratively, there is little difference between DDR programmes for armed forces and armed groups. Both may require the full registration of weapons and personnel, followed by the collection of information, referral and counselling that are needed before effective reintegration programmes can be put in place. \nThe rightsizing of armed forces or police: Governments may request assistance to downsize or restructure their armies or police and supporting institutional infrastructure (salaries, benefits, basic services, etc.). Such processes contribute to security sector reform (SSR) (see IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform). DDR practitioners should work in close collaboration with SSR experts while planning reintegration support to former members of armed forces. \nThe repatriation of foreign combatants and associated groups: Considering the regional dimensions of conflict, Governments may agree to assistance to repatriation. DDR programmes may need to become involved in repatriating national combatants and their civilian family members, as well as children associated with armed forces and groups who may have crossed an international border. Such repatriation needs to be in accordance with the principle of non-refoulement, as set out in international humanitarian, human rights and refugee law (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -13789,7 +13789,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 317, - "Paragraph": "The UN may employ or support a variety of DDR programming elements adapted to suit each context. These may include: \\nThe disbanding of armed groups: Governments may request assistance to disband armed groups. The establishment of a DDR programme is agreed to and defined within a ceasefire, the ending of hostilities or a comprehensive peace agreement. Trust and commitment by the parties to the implementation of an agreement and minimum conditions of security are essential for the success of a DDR programme. Administratively, there is little difference between DDR programmes for armed forces and armed groups. Both may require the full registration of weapons and personnel, followed by the collection of information, referral and counselling that are needed before effective reintegration programmes can be put in place. \\nThe rightsizing of armed forces or police: Governments may request assistance to downsize or restructure their armies or police and supporting institutional infrastructure (salaries, benefits, basic services, etc.). Such processes contribute to security sector reform (SSR) (see IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform). DDR practitioners should work in close collaboration with SSR experts while planning reintegration support to former members of armed forces. \\nThe repatriation of foreign combatants and associated groups: Considering the regional dimensions of conflict, Governments may agree to assistance to repatriation. DDR programmes may need to become involved in repatriating national combatants and their civilian family members, as well as children associated with armed forces and groups who may have crossed an international border. Such repatriation needs to be in accordance with the principle of non-refoulement, as set out in international humanitarian, human rights and refugee law (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", + "Paragraph": "The UN may employ or support a variety of DDR programming elements adapted to suit each context. These may include: \nThe disbanding of armed groups: Governments may request assistance to disband armed groups. The establishment of a DDR programme is agreed to and defined within a ceasefire, the ending of hostilities or a comprehensive peace agreement. Trust and commitment by the parties to the implementation of an agreement and minimum conditions of security are essential for the success of a DDR programme. Administratively, there is little difference between DDR programmes for armed forces and armed groups. Both may require the full registration of weapons and personnel, followed by the collection of information, referral and counselling that are needed before effective reintegration programmes can be put in place. \nThe rightsizing of armed forces or police: Governments may request assistance to downsize or restructure their armies or police and supporting institutional infrastructure (salaries, benefits, basic services, etc.). Such processes contribute to security sector reform (SSR) (see IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform). DDR practitioners should work in close collaboration with SSR experts while planning reintegration support to former members of armed forces. \nThe repatriation of foreign combatants and associated groups: Considering the regional dimensions of conflict, Governments may agree to assistance to repatriation. DDR programmes may need to become involved in repatriating national combatants and their civilian family members, as well as children associated with armed forces and groups who may have crossed an international border. Such repatriation needs to be in accordance with the principle of non-refoulement, as set out in international humanitarian, human rights and refugee law (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -13807,7 +13807,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 317, - "Paragraph": "The UN may employ or support a variety of DDR programming elements adapted to suit each context. These may include: \\nThe disbanding of armed groups: Governments may request assistance to disband armed groups. The establishment of a DDR programme is agreed to and defined within a ceasefire, the ending of hostilities or a comprehensive peace agreement. Trust and commitment by the parties to the implementation of an agreement and minimum conditions of security are essential for the success of a DDR programme. Administratively, there is little difference between DDR programmes for armed forces and armed groups. Both may require the full registration of weapons and personnel, followed by the collection of information, referral and counselling that are needed before effective reintegration programmes can be put in place. \\nThe rightsizing of armed forces or police: Governments may request assistance to downsize or restructure their armies or police and supporting institutional infrastructure (salaries, benefits, basic services, etc.). Such processes contribute to security sector reform (SSR) (see IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform). DDR practitioners should work in close collaboration with SSR experts while planning reintegration support to former members of armed forces. \\nThe repatriation of foreign combatants and associated groups: Considering the regional dimensions of conflict, Governments may agree to assistance to repatriation. DDR programmes may need to become involved in repatriating national combatants and their civilian family members, as well as children associated with armed forces and groups who may have crossed an international border. Such repatriation needs to be in accordance with the principle of non-refoulement, as set out in international humanitarian, human rights and refugee law (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", + "Paragraph": "The UN may employ or support a variety of DDR programming elements adapted to suit each context. These may include: \nThe disbanding of armed groups: Governments may request assistance to disband armed groups. The establishment of a DDR programme is agreed to and defined within a ceasefire, the ending of hostilities or a comprehensive peace agreement. Trust and commitment by the parties to the implementation of an agreement and minimum conditions of security are essential for the success of a DDR programme. Administratively, there is little difference between DDR programmes for armed forces and armed groups. Both may require the full registration of weapons and personnel, followed by the collection of information, referral and counselling that are needed before effective reintegration programmes can be put in place. \nThe rightsizing of armed forces or police: Governments may request assistance to downsize or restructure their armies or police and supporting institutional infrastructure (salaries, benefits, basic services, etc.). Such processes contribute to security sector reform (SSR) (see IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform). DDR practitioners should work in close collaboration with SSR experts while planning reintegration support to former members of armed forces. \nThe repatriation of foreign combatants and associated groups: Considering the regional dimensions of conflict, Governments may agree to assistance to repatriation. DDR programmes may need to become involved in repatriating national combatants and their civilian family members, as well as children associated with armed forces and groups who may have crossed an international border. Such repatriation needs to be in accordance with the principle of non-refoulement, as set out in international humanitarian, human rights and refugee law (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -13818,14 +13818,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nThe rightsizing of armed forces or police: Governments may request assistance to downsize or restructure their armies or police and supporting institutional infrastructure (salaries, benefits, basic services, etc.).", + "Sentence": "\nThe rightsizing of armed forces or police: Governments may request assistance to downsize or restructure their armies or police and supporting institutional infrastructure (salaries, benefits, basic services, etc.).", "newParagraph": "un may employ support variety ddr programming element adapted suit context may include nthe disbanding armed group government may request assistance disband armed group establishment ddr programme agreed defined within ceasefire ending hostility comprehensive peace agreement trust commitment party implementation agreement minimum condition security essential success ddr programme administratively little difference ddr programme armed force armed group may require full registration weapon personnel followed collection information referral counselling needed effective reintegration programme put place nthe rightsizing armed force police government may request assistance downsize restructure army police supporting institutional infrastructure salary benefit basic service etc process contribute security sector reform ssr see iddrs 610 ddr security sector reform ddr practitioner work close collaboration ssr expert planning reintegration support former member armed force nthe repatriation foreign combatant associated group considering regional dimension conflict government may agree assistance repatriation ddr programme may need become involved repatriating national combatant civilian family member well child associated armed force group may crossed international border repatriation need accordance principle nonrefoulement set international humanitarian human right refugee law see iddrs 211 legal framework un ddr", "ProcessedSent": "nthe rightsizing armed force police government may request assistance downsize restructure army police supporting institutional infrastructure salary benefit basic service etc", "SentID": 767 }, { "ParagraphID": 317, - "Paragraph": "The UN may employ or support a variety of DDR programming elements adapted to suit each context. These may include: \\nThe disbanding of armed groups: Governments may request assistance to disband armed groups. The establishment of a DDR programme is agreed to and defined within a ceasefire, the ending of hostilities or a comprehensive peace agreement. Trust and commitment by the parties to the implementation of an agreement and minimum conditions of security are essential for the success of a DDR programme. Administratively, there is little difference between DDR programmes for armed forces and armed groups. Both may require the full registration of weapons and personnel, followed by the collection of information, referral and counselling that are needed before effective reintegration programmes can be put in place. \\nThe rightsizing of armed forces or police: Governments may request assistance to downsize or restructure their armies or police and supporting institutional infrastructure (salaries, benefits, basic services, etc.). Such processes contribute to security sector reform (SSR) (see IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform). DDR practitioners should work in close collaboration with SSR experts while planning reintegration support to former members of armed forces. \\nThe repatriation of foreign combatants and associated groups: Considering the regional dimensions of conflict, Governments may agree to assistance to repatriation. DDR programmes may need to become involved in repatriating national combatants and their civilian family members, as well as children associated with armed forces and groups who may have crossed an international border. Such repatriation needs to be in accordance with the principle of non-refoulement, as set out in international humanitarian, human rights and refugee law (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", + "Paragraph": "The UN may employ or support a variety of DDR programming elements adapted to suit each context. These may include: \nThe disbanding of armed groups: Governments may request assistance to disband armed groups. The establishment of a DDR programme is agreed to and defined within a ceasefire, the ending of hostilities or a comprehensive peace agreement. Trust and commitment by the parties to the implementation of an agreement and minimum conditions of security are essential for the success of a DDR programme. Administratively, there is little difference between DDR programmes for armed forces and armed groups. Both may require the full registration of weapons and personnel, followed by the collection of information, referral and counselling that are needed before effective reintegration programmes can be put in place. \nThe rightsizing of armed forces or police: Governments may request assistance to downsize or restructure their armies or police and supporting institutional infrastructure (salaries, benefits, basic services, etc.). Such processes contribute to security sector reform (SSR) (see IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform). DDR practitioners should work in close collaboration with SSR experts while planning reintegration support to former members of armed forces. \nThe repatriation of foreign combatants and associated groups: Considering the regional dimensions of conflict, Governments may agree to assistance to repatriation. DDR programmes may need to become involved in repatriating national combatants and their civilian family members, as well as children associated with armed forces and groups who may have crossed an international border. Such repatriation needs to be in accordance with the principle of non-refoulement, as set out in international humanitarian, human rights and refugee law (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -13843,7 +13843,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 317, - "Paragraph": "The UN may employ or support a variety of DDR programming elements adapted to suit each context. These may include: \\nThe disbanding of armed groups: Governments may request assistance to disband armed groups. The establishment of a DDR programme is agreed to and defined within a ceasefire, the ending of hostilities or a comprehensive peace agreement. Trust and commitment by the parties to the implementation of an agreement and minimum conditions of security are essential for the success of a DDR programme. Administratively, there is little difference between DDR programmes for armed forces and armed groups. Both may require the full registration of weapons and personnel, followed by the collection of information, referral and counselling that are needed before effective reintegration programmes can be put in place. \\nThe rightsizing of armed forces or police: Governments may request assistance to downsize or restructure their armies or police and supporting institutional infrastructure (salaries, benefits, basic services, etc.). Such processes contribute to security sector reform (SSR) (see IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform). DDR practitioners should work in close collaboration with SSR experts while planning reintegration support to former members of armed forces. \\nThe repatriation of foreign combatants and associated groups: Considering the regional dimensions of conflict, Governments may agree to assistance to repatriation. DDR programmes may need to become involved in repatriating national combatants and their civilian family members, as well as children associated with armed forces and groups who may have crossed an international border. Such repatriation needs to be in accordance with the principle of non-refoulement, as set out in international humanitarian, human rights and refugee law (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", + "Paragraph": "The UN may employ or support a variety of DDR programming elements adapted to suit each context. These may include: \nThe disbanding of armed groups: Governments may request assistance to disband armed groups. The establishment of a DDR programme is agreed to and defined within a ceasefire, the ending of hostilities or a comprehensive peace agreement. Trust and commitment by the parties to the implementation of an agreement and minimum conditions of security are essential for the success of a DDR programme. Administratively, there is little difference between DDR programmes for armed forces and armed groups. Both may require the full registration of weapons and personnel, followed by the collection of information, referral and counselling that are needed before effective reintegration programmes can be put in place. \nThe rightsizing of armed forces or police: Governments may request assistance to downsize or restructure their armies or police and supporting institutional infrastructure (salaries, benefits, basic services, etc.). Such processes contribute to security sector reform (SSR) (see IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform). DDR practitioners should work in close collaboration with SSR experts while planning reintegration support to former members of armed forces. \nThe repatriation of foreign combatants and associated groups: Considering the regional dimensions of conflict, Governments may agree to assistance to repatriation. DDR programmes may need to become involved in repatriating national combatants and their civilian family members, as well as children associated with armed forces and groups who may have crossed an international border. Such repatriation needs to be in accordance with the principle of non-refoulement, as set out in international humanitarian, human rights and refugee law (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -13861,7 +13861,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 317, - "Paragraph": "The UN may employ or support a variety of DDR programming elements adapted to suit each context. These may include: \\nThe disbanding of armed groups: Governments may request assistance to disband armed groups. The establishment of a DDR programme is agreed to and defined within a ceasefire, the ending of hostilities or a comprehensive peace agreement. Trust and commitment by the parties to the implementation of an agreement and minimum conditions of security are essential for the success of a DDR programme. Administratively, there is little difference between DDR programmes for armed forces and armed groups. Both may require the full registration of weapons and personnel, followed by the collection of information, referral and counselling that are needed before effective reintegration programmes can be put in place. \\nThe rightsizing of armed forces or police: Governments may request assistance to downsize or restructure their armies or police and supporting institutional infrastructure (salaries, benefits, basic services, etc.). Such processes contribute to security sector reform (SSR) (see IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform). DDR practitioners should work in close collaboration with SSR experts while planning reintegration support to former members of armed forces. \\nThe repatriation of foreign combatants and associated groups: Considering the regional dimensions of conflict, Governments may agree to assistance to repatriation. DDR programmes may need to become involved in repatriating national combatants and their civilian family members, as well as children associated with armed forces and groups who may have crossed an international border. Such repatriation needs to be in accordance with the principle of non-refoulement, as set out in international humanitarian, human rights and refugee law (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", + "Paragraph": "The UN may employ or support a variety of DDR programming elements adapted to suit each context. These may include: \nThe disbanding of armed groups: Governments may request assistance to disband armed groups. The establishment of a DDR programme is agreed to and defined within a ceasefire, the ending of hostilities or a comprehensive peace agreement. Trust and commitment by the parties to the implementation of an agreement and minimum conditions of security are essential for the success of a DDR programme. Administratively, there is little difference between DDR programmes for armed forces and armed groups. Both may require the full registration of weapons and personnel, followed by the collection of information, referral and counselling that are needed before effective reintegration programmes can be put in place. \nThe rightsizing of armed forces or police: Governments may request assistance to downsize or restructure their armies or police and supporting institutional infrastructure (salaries, benefits, basic services, etc.). Such processes contribute to security sector reform (SSR) (see IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform). DDR practitioners should work in close collaboration with SSR experts while planning reintegration support to former members of armed forces. \nThe repatriation of foreign combatants and associated groups: Considering the regional dimensions of conflict, Governments may agree to assistance to repatriation. DDR programmes may need to become involved in repatriating national combatants and their civilian family members, as well as children associated with armed forces and groups who may have crossed an international border. Such repatriation needs to be in accordance with the principle of non-refoulement, as set out in international humanitarian, human rights and refugee law (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -13872,14 +13872,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nThe repatriation of foreign combatants and associated groups: Considering the regional dimensions of conflict, Governments may agree to assistance to repatriation.", + "Sentence": "\nThe repatriation of foreign combatants and associated groups: Considering the regional dimensions of conflict, Governments may agree to assistance to repatriation.", "newParagraph": "un may employ support variety ddr programming element adapted suit context may include nthe disbanding armed group government may request assistance disband armed group establishment ddr programme agreed defined within ceasefire ending hostility comprehensive peace agreement trust commitment party implementation agreement minimum condition security essential success ddr programme administratively little difference ddr programme armed force armed group may require full registration weapon personnel followed collection information referral counselling needed effective reintegration programme put place nthe rightsizing armed force police government may request assistance downsize restructure army police supporting institutional infrastructure salary benefit basic service etc process contribute security sector reform ssr see iddrs 610 ddr security sector reform ddr practitioner work close collaboration ssr expert planning reintegration support former member armed force nthe repatriation foreign combatant associated group considering regional dimension conflict government may agree assistance repatriation ddr programme may need become involved repatriating national combatant civilian family member well child associated armed force group may crossed international border repatriation need accordance principle nonrefoulement set international humanitarian human right refugee law see iddrs 211 legal framework un ddr", "ProcessedSent": "nthe repatriation foreign combatant associated group considering regional dimension conflict government may agree assistance repatriation", "SentID": 770 }, { "ParagraphID": 317, - "Paragraph": "The UN may employ or support a variety of DDR programming elements adapted to suit each context. These may include: \\nThe disbanding of armed groups: Governments may request assistance to disband armed groups. The establishment of a DDR programme is agreed to and defined within a ceasefire, the ending of hostilities or a comprehensive peace agreement. Trust and commitment by the parties to the implementation of an agreement and minimum conditions of security are essential for the success of a DDR programme. Administratively, there is little difference between DDR programmes for armed forces and armed groups. Both may require the full registration of weapons and personnel, followed by the collection of information, referral and counselling that are needed before effective reintegration programmes can be put in place. \\nThe rightsizing of armed forces or police: Governments may request assistance to downsize or restructure their armies or police and supporting institutional infrastructure (salaries, benefits, basic services, etc.). Such processes contribute to security sector reform (SSR) (see IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform). DDR practitioners should work in close collaboration with SSR experts while planning reintegration support to former members of armed forces. \\nThe repatriation of foreign combatants and associated groups: Considering the regional dimensions of conflict, Governments may agree to assistance to repatriation. DDR programmes may need to become involved in repatriating national combatants and their civilian family members, as well as children associated with armed forces and groups who may have crossed an international border. Such repatriation needs to be in accordance with the principle of non-refoulement, as set out in international humanitarian, human rights and refugee law (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", + "Paragraph": "The UN may employ or support a variety of DDR programming elements adapted to suit each context. These may include: \nThe disbanding of armed groups: Governments may request assistance to disband armed groups. The establishment of a DDR programme is agreed to and defined within a ceasefire, the ending of hostilities or a comprehensive peace agreement. Trust and commitment by the parties to the implementation of an agreement and minimum conditions of security are essential for the success of a DDR programme. Administratively, there is little difference between DDR programmes for armed forces and armed groups. Both may require the full registration of weapons and personnel, followed by the collection of information, referral and counselling that are needed before effective reintegration programmes can be put in place. \nThe rightsizing of armed forces or police: Governments may request assistance to downsize or restructure their armies or police and supporting institutional infrastructure (salaries, benefits, basic services, etc.). Such processes contribute to security sector reform (SSR) (see IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform). DDR practitioners should work in close collaboration with SSR experts while planning reintegration support to former members of armed forces. \nThe repatriation of foreign combatants and associated groups: Considering the regional dimensions of conflict, Governments may agree to assistance to repatriation. DDR programmes may need to become involved in repatriating national combatants and their civilian family members, as well as children associated with armed forces and groups who may have crossed an international border. Such repatriation needs to be in accordance with the principle of non-refoulement, as set out in international humanitarian, human rights and refugee law (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -13897,7 +13897,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 317, - "Paragraph": "The UN may employ or support a variety of DDR programming elements adapted to suit each context. These may include: \\nThe disbanding of armed groups: Governments may request assistance to disband armed groups. The establishment of a DDR programme is agreed to and defined within a ceasefire, the ending of hostilities or a comprehensive peace agreement. Trust and commitment by the parties to the implementation of an agreement and minimum conditions of security are essential for the success of a DDR programme. Administratively, there is little difference between DDR programmes for armed forces and armed groups. Both may require the full registration of weapons and personnel, followed by the collection of information, referral and counselling that are needed before effective reintegration programmes can be put in place. \\nThe rightsizing of armed forces or police: Governments may request assistance to downsize or restructure their armies or police and supporting institutional infrastructure (salaries, benefits, basic services, etc.). Such processes contribute to security sector reform (SSR) (see IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform). DDR practitioners should work in close collaboration with SSR experts while planning reintegration support to former members of armed forces. \\nThe repatriation of foreign combatants and associated groups: Considering the regional dimensions of conflict, Governments may agree to assistance to repatriation. DDR programmes may need to become involved in repatriating national combatants and their civilian family members, as well as children associated with armed forces and groups who may have crossed an international border. Such repatriation needs to be in accordance with the principle of non-refoulement, as set out in international humanitarian, human rights and refugee law (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", + "Paragraph": "The UN may employ or support a variety of DDR programming elements adapted to suit each context. These may include: \nThe disbanding of armed groups: Governments may request assistance to disband armed groups. The establishment of a DDR programme is agreed to and defined within a ceasefire, the ending of hostilities or a comprehensive peace agreement. Trust and commitment by the parties to the implementation of an agreement and minimum conditions of security are essential for the success of a DDR programme. Administratively, there is little difference between DDR programmes for armed forces and armed groups. Both may require the full registration of weapons and personnel, followed by the collection of information, referral and counselling that are needed before effective reintegration programmes can be put in place. \nThe rightsizing of armed forces or police: Governments may request assistance to downsize or restructure their armies or police and supporting institutional infrastructure (salaries, benefits, basic services, etc.). Such processes contribute to security sector reform (SSR) (see IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform). DDR practitioners should work in close collaboration with SSR experts while planning reintegration support to former members of armed forces. \nThe repatriation of foreign combatants and associated groups: Considering the regional dimensions of conflict, Governments may agree to assistance to repatriation. DDR programmes may need to become involved in repatriating national combatants and their civilian family members, as well as children associated with armed forces and groups who may have crossed an international border. Such repatriation needs to be in accordance with the principle of non-refoulement, as set out in international humanitarian, human rights and refugee law (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -13969,7 +13969,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 320, - "Paragraph": "Five categories of people should be taken into consideration, as participants and beneficiaries, in integrated DDR processes. This will depend on the context, and the particular combination of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, and reintegration support in use: \\n1. members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \\n2. abductees\/victims; \\n3. dependents\/families; \\n4. civilian returnees\/\u2019self-demobilized\u2019; \\n5. community members.", + "Paragraph": "Five categories of people should be taken into consideration, as participants and beneficiaries, in integrated DDR processes. This will depend on the context, and the particular combination of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, and reintegration support in use: \n1. members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \n2. abductees\/victims; \n3. dependents\/families; \n4. civilian returnees\/\u2019self-demobilized\u2019; \n5. community members.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -13987,7 +13987,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 320, - "Paragraph": "Five categories of people should be taken into consideration, as participants and beneficiaries, in integrated DDR processes. This will depend on the context, and the particular combination of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, and reintegration support in use: \\n1. members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \\n2. abductees\/victims; \\n3. dependents\/families; \\n4. civilian returnees\/\u2019self-demobilized\u2019; \\n5. community members.", + "Paragraph": "Five categories of people should be taken into consideration, as participants and beneficiaries, in integrated DDR processes. This will depend on the context, and the particular combination of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, and reintegration support in use: \n1. members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \n2. abductees\/victims; \n3. dependents\/families; \n4. civilian returnees\/\u2019self-demobilized\u2019; \n5. community members.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -13998,14 +13998,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This will depend on the context, and the particular combination of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, and reintegration support in use: \\n1.", + "Sentence": "This will depend on the context, and the particular combination of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, and reintegration support in use: \n1.", "newParagraph": "five category people taken consideration participant beneficiary integrated ddr process depend context particular combination ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support use n1 member armed force group served combat andor support role support role often referred associated armed force group n2 abducteesvictims n3 dependentsfamilies n4 civilian returnees selfdemobilized n5 community member", "ProcessedSent": "depend context particular combination ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support use n1", "SentID": 777 }, { "ParagraphID": 320, - "Paragraph": "Five categories of people should be taken into consideration, as participants and beneficiaries, in integrated DDR processes. This will depend on the context, and the particular combination of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, and reintegration support in use: \\n1. members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \\n2. abductees\/victims; \\n3. dependents\/families; \\n4. civilian returnees\/\u2019self-demobilized\u2019; \\n5. community members.", + "Paragraph": "Five categories of people should be taken into consideration, as participants and beneficiaries, in integrated DDR processes. This will depend on the context, and the particular combination of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, and reintegration support in use: \n1. members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \n2. abductees\/victims; \n3. dependents\/families; \n4. civilian returnees\/\u2019self-demobilized\u2019; \n5. community members.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -14016,14 +14016,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \\n2.", + "Sentence": "members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \n2.", "newParagraph": "five category people taken consideration participant beneficiary integrated ddr process depend context particular combination ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support use n1 member armed force group served combat andor support role support role often referred associated armed force group n2 abducteesvictims n3 dependentsfamilies n4 civilian returnees selfdemobilized n5 community member", "ProcessedSent": "member armed force group served combat andor support role support role often referred associated armed force group n2", "SentID": 778 }, { "ParagraphID": 320, - "Paragraph": "Five categories of people should be taken into consideration, as participants and beneficiaries, in integrated DDR processes. This will depend on the context, and the particular combination of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, and reintegration support in use: \\n1. members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \\n2. abductees\/victims; \\n3. dependents\/families; \\n4. civilian returnees\/\u2019self-demobilized\u2019; \\n5. community members.", + "Paragraph": "Five categories of people should be taken into consideration, as participants and beneficiaries, in integrated DDR processes. This will depend on the context, and the particular combination of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, and reintegration support in use: \n1. members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \n2. abductees\/victims; \n3. dependents\/families; \n4. civilian returnees\/\u2019self-demobilized\u2019; \n5. community members.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -14034,14 +14034,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "abductees\/victims; \\n3.", + "Sentence": "abductees\/victims; \n3.", "newParagraph": "five category people taken consideration participant beneficiary integrated ddr process depend context particular combination ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support use n1 member armed force group served combat andor support role support role often referred associated armed force group n2 abducteesvictims n3 dependentsfamilies n4 civilian returnees selfdemobilized n5 community member", "ProcessedSent": "abducteesvictims n3", "SentID": 779 }, { "ParagraphID": 320, - "Paragraph": "Five categories of people should be taken into consideration, as participants and beneficiaries, in integrated DDR processes. This will depend on the context, and the particular combination of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, and reintegration support in use: \\n1. members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \\n2. abductees\/victims; \\n3. dependents\/families; \\n4. civilian returnees\/\u2019self-demobilized\u2019; \\n5. community members.", + "Paragraph": "Five categories of people should be taken into consideration, as participants and beneficiaries, in integrated DDR processes. This will depend on the context, and the particular combination of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, and reintegration support in use: \n1. members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \n2. abductees\/victims; \n3. dependents\/families; \n4. civilian returnees\/\u2019self-demobilized\u2019; \n5. community members.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -14052,14 +14052,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "dependents\/families; \\n4.", + "Sentence": "dependents\/families; \n4.", "newParagraph": "five category people taken consideration participant beneficiary integrated ddr process depend context particular combination ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support use n1 member armed force group served combat andor support role support role often referred associated armed force group n2 abducteesvictims n3 dependentsfamilies n4 civilian returnees selfdemobilized n5 community member", "ProcessedSent": "dependentsfamilies n4", "SentID": 780 }, { "ParagraphID": 320, - "Paragraph": "Five categories of people should be taken into consideration, as participants and beneficiaries, in integrated DDR processes. This will depend on the context, and the particular combination of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, and reintegration support in use: \\n1. members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \\n2. abductees\/victims; \\n3. dependents\/families; \\n4. civilian returnees\/\u2019self-demobilized\u2019; \\n5. community members.", + "Paragraph": "Five categories of people should be taken into consideration, as participants and beneficiaries, in integrated DDR processes. This will depend on the context, and the particular combination of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, and reintegration support in use: \n1. members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \n2. abductees\/victims; \n3. dependents\/families; \n4. civilian returnees\/\u2019self-demobilized\u2019; \n5. community members.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -14070,14 +14070,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "civilian returnees\/\u2019self-demobilized\u2019; \\n5.", + "Sentence": "civilian returnees\/\u2019self-demobilized\u2019; \n5.", "newParagraph": "five category people taken consideration participant beneficiary integrated ddr process depend context particular combination ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support use n1 member armed force group served combat andor support role support role often referred associated armed force group n2 abducteesvictims n3 dependentsfamilies n4 civilian returnees selfdemobilized n5 community member", "ProcessedSent": "civilian returnees selfdemobilized n5", "SentID": 781 }, { "ParagraphID": 320, - "Paragraph": "Five categories of people should be taken into consideration, as participants and beneficiaries, in integrated DDR processes. This will depend on the context, and the particular combination of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, and reintegration support in use: \\n1. members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \\n2. abductees\/victims; \\n3. dependents\/families; \\n4. civilian returnees\/\u2019self-demobilized\u2019; \\n5. community members.", + "Paragraph": "Five categories of people should be taken into consideration, as participants and beneficiaries, in integrated DDR processes. This will depend on the context, and the particular combination of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, and reintegration support in use: \n1. members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \n2. abductees\/victims; \n3. dependents\/families; \n4. civilian returnees\/\u2019self-demobilized\u2019; \n5. community members.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -15211,7 +15211,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 341, - "Paragraph": "The UN aims to establish transparent mechanisms for the independent monitoring, oversight and evaluation of integrated DDR and its financing mechanisms. It also attempts to create an environment in which all stakeholders understand and are accountable for achieving broad objectives and implementing the details of integrated DDR processes, even if circumstances change. Many types of accountability are needed to ensure transparency, including: \\n the commitment of the national authorities and the parties to a peace agreement or political framework to honour the agreements they have signed and implement DDR programmes in good faith; the accountability and transparency of all relevant actors in contexts where the preconditions for DDR are not in place and alternative DDR-related tools and reintegration support measures are implemented; \\n the accountability of national and international implementing agencies to the five categories of persons who can become participants in DDR for the professional and timely carrying out of activities and delivery of services; \\n the adherence of all parts of the UN system (missions, departments, agencies, programmes and funds) to IDDRS principles and guidance for designing and implementing DDR; \\n the commitment of Member States and bilateral partners to provide timely political and financial support to integrated DDR processes", + "Paragraph": "The UN aims to establish transparent mechanisms for the independent monitoring, oversight and evaluation of integrated DDR and its financing mechanisms. It also attempts to create an environment in which all stakeholders understand and are accountable for achieving broad objectives and implementing the details of integrated DDR processes, even if circumstances change. Many types of accountability are needed to ensure transparency, including: \n the commitment of the national authorities and the parties to a peace agreement or political framework to honour the agreements they have signed and implement DDR programmes in good faith; the accountability and transparency of all relevant actors in contexts where the preconditions for DDR are not in place and alternative DDR-related tools and reintegration support measures are implemented; \n the accountability of national and international implementing agencies to the five categories of persons who can become participants in DDR for the professional and timely carrying out of activities and delivery of services; \n the adherence of all parts of the UN system (missions, departments, agencies, programmes and funds) to IDDRS principles and guidance for designing and implementing DDR; \n the commitment of Member States and bilateral partners to provide timely political and financial support to integrated DDR processes", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -15229,7 +15229,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 341, - "Paragraph": "The UN aims to establish transparent mechanisms for the independent monitoring, oversight and evaluation of integrated DDR and its financing mechanisms. It also attempts to create an environment in which all stakeholders understand and are accountable for achieving broad objectives and implementing the details of integrated DDR processes, even if circumstances change. Many types of accountability are needed to ensure transparency, including: \\n the commitment of the national authorities and the parties to a peace agreement or political framework to honour the agreements they have signed and implement DDR programmes in good faith; the accountability and transparency of all relevant actors in contexts where the preconditions for DDR are not in place and alternative DDR-related tools and reintegration support measures are implemented; \\n the accountability of national and international implementing agencies to the five categories of persons who can become participants in DDR for the professional and timely carrying out of activities and delivery of services; \\n the adherence of all parts of the UN system (missions, departments, agencies, programmes and funds) to IDDRS principles and guidance for designing and implementing DDR; \\n the commitment of Member States and bilateral partners to provide timely political and financial support to integrated DDR processes", + "Paragraph": "The UN aims to establish transparent mechanisms for the independent monitoring, oversight and evaluation of integrated DDR and its financing mechanisms. It also attempts to create an environment in which all stakeholders understand and are accountable for achieving broad objectives and implementing the details of integrated DDR processes, even if circumstances change. Many types of accountability are needed to ensure transparency, including: \n the commitment of the national authorities and the parties to a peace agreement or political framework to honour the agreements they have signed and implement DDR programmes in good faith; the accountability and transparency of all relevant actors in contexts where the preconditions for DDR are not in place and alternative DDR-related tools and reintegration support measures are implemented; \n the accountability of national and international implementing agencies to the five categories of persons who can become participants in DDR for the professional and timely carrying out of activities and delivery of services; \n the adherence of all parts of the UN system (missions, departments, agencies, programmes and funds) to IDDRS principles and guidance for designing and implementing DDR; \n the commitment of Member States and bilateral partners to provide timely political and financial support to integrated DDR processes", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -15247,7 +15247,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 341, - "Paragraph": "The UN aims to establish transparent mechanisms for the independent monitoring, oversight and evaluation of integrated DDR and its financing mechanisms. It also attempts to create an environment in which all stakeholders understand and are accountable for achieving broad objectives and implementing the details of integrated DDR processes, even if circumstances change. Many types of accountability are needed to ensure transparency, including: \\n the commitment of the national authorities and the parties to a peace agreement or political framework to honour the agreements they have signed and implement DDR programmes in good faith; the accountability and transparency of all relevant actors in contexts where the preconditions for DDR are not in place and alternative DDR-related tools and reintegration support measures are implemented; \\n the accountability of national and international implementing agencies to the five categories of persons who can become participants in DDR for the professional and timely carrying out of activities and delivery of services; \\n the adherence of all parts of the UN system (missions, departments, agencies, programmes and funds) to IDDRS principles and guidance for designing and implementing DDR; \\n the commitment of Member States and bilateral partners to provide timely political and financial support to integrated DDR processes", + "Paragraph": "The UN aims to establish transparent mechanisms for the independent monitoring, oversight and evaluation of integrated DDR and its financing mechanisms. It also attempts to create an environment in which all stakeholders understand and are accountable for achieving broad objectives and implementing the details of integrated DDR processes, even if circumstances change. Many types of accountability are needed to ensure transparency, including: \n the commitment of the national authorities and the parties to a peace agreement or political framework to honour the agreements they have signed and implement DDR programmes in good faith; the accountability and transparency of all relevant actors in contexts where the preconditions for DDR are not in place and alternative DDR-related tools and reintegration support measures are implemented; \n the accountability of national and international implementing agencies to the five categories of persons who can become participants in DDR for the professional and timely carrying out of activities and delivery of services; \n the adherence of all parts of the UN system (missions, departments, agencies, programmes and funds) to IDDRS principles and guidance for designing and implementing DDR; \n the commitment of Member States and bilateral partners to provide timely political and financial support to integrated DDR processes", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -15258,7 +15258,7 @@ "Heading2": "8.6 Flexible, accountable and transparent ", "Heading3": "8.6.2 Accountability and transparency", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Many types of accountability are needed to ensure transparency, including: \\n the commitment of the national authorities and the parties to a peace agreement or political framework to honour the agreements they have signed and implement DDR programmes in good faith; the accountability and transparency of all relevant actors in contexts where the preconditions for DDR are not in place and alternative DDR-related tools and reintegration support measures are implemented; \\n the accountability of national and international implementing agencies to the five categories of persons who can become participants in DDR for the professional and timely carrying out of activities and delivery of services; \\n the adherence of all parts of the UN system (missions, departments, agencies, programmes and funds) to IDDRS principles and guidance for designing and implementing DDR; \\n the commitment of Member States and bilateral partners to provide timely political and financial support to integrated DDR processes", + "Sentence": "Many types of accountability are needed to ensure transparency, including: \n the commitment of the national authorities and the parties to a peace agreement or political framework to honour the agreements they have signed and implement DDR programmes in good faith; the accountability and transparency of all relevant actors in contexts where the preconditions for DDR are not in place and alternative DDR-related tools and reintegration support measures are implemented; \n the accountability of national and international implementing agencies to the five categories of persons who can become participants in DDR for the professional and timely carrying out of activities and delivery of services; \n the adherence of all parts of the UN system (missions, departments, agencies, programmes and funds) to IDDRS principles and guidance for designing and implementing DDR; \n the commitment of Member States and bilateral partners to provide timely political and financial support to integrated DDR processes", "newParagraph": "un aim establish transparent mechanism independent monitoring oversight evaluation integrated ddr financing mechanism also attempt create environment stakeholder understand accountable achieving broad objective implementing detail integrated ddr process even circumstance change many type accountability needed ensure transparency including n commitment national authority party peace agreement political framework honour agreement signed implement ddr programme good faith accountability transparency relevant actor context precondition ddr place alternative ddrrelated tool reintegration support measure implemented n accountability national international implementing agency five category person become participant ddr professional timely carrying activity delivery service n adherence part un system mission department agency programme fund iddrs principle guidance designing implementing ddr n commitment member state bilateral partner provide timely political financial support integrated ddr process", "ProcessedSent": "many type accountability needed ensure transparency including n commitment national authority party peace agreement political framework honour agreement signed implement ddr programme good faith accountability transparency relevant actor context precondition ddr place alternative ddrrelated tool reintegration support measure implemented n accountability national international implementing agency five category person become participant ddr professional timely carrying activity delivery service n adherence part un system mission department agency programme fund iddrs principle guidance designing implementing ddr n commitment member state bilateral partner provide timely political financial support integrated ddr process", "SentID": 847 @@ -15409,7 +15409,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 345, - "Paragraph": "National and local capacity must be systematically developed, as follows: \\n Creating national and local institutional capacity: A primary role of the UN is to supply technical assistance, training and financial support to national authorities to establish credible, capable, representative and sustainable national institutions and programmes. Such assistance should be based on an assessment and understanding of the particular context and the type of DDR activities to be implemented, including commitments to gender equality. \\n Finding implementing partners: Besides national institutions, civil society is a key partner in DDR. The technical capacity and expertise of civil society groups will often need to be strengthened, particularly when conflict has diminished human and financial resources. Particular attention should be paid to supporting the capacity development of women\u2019s civil society groups to ensure equal participation as partners in DDR. Doing so will help to create a sustainable environment for DDR and to ensure its long-term success. \\n Employing local communities and authorities: Local communities and authorities play an important role in ensuring the sustainability of DDR, particularly in support of reintegration and the implementation of DDR-related tools. Therefore, their capacities for strategic planning and programme and\/or financial management must be strengthened. Local authorities and populations, ex-combatants and their dependents\/families, and women and girls formerly associated with armed forces and groups shall all be involved in the planning, implementation and monitoring of integrated DDR processes. This is to ensure that the needs of both individuals and the community are addressed. Increased local ownership builds support for reintegration and reconciliation efforts and supports other local peacebuilding and recovery processes.", + "Paragraph": "National and local capacity must be systematically developed, as follows: \n Creating national and local institutional capacity: A primary role of the UN is to supply technical assistance, training and financial support to national authorities to establish credible, capable, representative and sustainable national institutions and programmes. Such assistance should be based on an assessment and understanding of the particular context and the type of DDR activities to be implemented, including commitments to gender equality. \n Finding implementing partners: Besides national institutions, civil society is a key partner in DDR. The technical capacity and expertise of civil society groups will often need to be strengthened, particularly when conflict has diminished human and financial resources. Particular attention should be paid to supporting the capacity development of women\u2019s civil society groups to ensure equal participation as partners in DDR. Doing so will help to create a sustainable environment for DDR and to ensure its long-term success. \n Employing local communities and authorities: Local communities and authorities play an important role in ensuring the sustainability of DDR, particularly in support of reintegration and the implementation of DDR-related tools. Therefore, their capacities for strategic planning and programme and\/or financial management must be strengthened. Local authorities and populations, ex-combatants and their dependents\/families, and women and girls formerly associated with armed forces and groups shall all be involved in the planning, implementation and monitoring of integrated DDR processes. This is to ensure that the needs of both individuals and the community are addressed. Increased local ownership builds support for reintegration and reconciliation efforts and supports other local peacebuilding and recovery processes.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -15420,14 +15420,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.7. Nationally and locally owned", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "National and local capacity must be systematically developed, as follows: \\n Creating national and local institutional capacity: A primary role of the UN is to supply technical assistance, training and financial support to national authorities to establish credible, capable, representative and sustainable national institutions and programmes.", + "Sentence": "National and local capacity must be systematically developed, as follows: \n Creating national and local institutional capacity: A primary role of the UN is to supply technical assistance, training and financial support to national authorities to establish credible, capable, representative and sustainable national institutions and programmes.", "newParagraph": "national local capacity must systematically developed follows n creating national local institutional capacity primary role un supply technical assistance training financial support national authority establish credible capable representative sustainable national institution programme assistance based assessment understanding particular context type ddr activity implemented including commitment gender equality n finding implementing partner besides national institution civil society key partner ddr technical capacity expertise civil society group often need strengthened particularly conflict diminished human financial resource particular attention paid supporting capacity development woman civil society group ensure equal participation partner ddr help create sustainable environment ddr ensure longterm success n employing local community authority local community authority play important role ensuring sustainability ddr particularly support reintegration implementation ddrrelated tool therefore capacity strategic planning programme andor financial management must strengthened local authority population excombatants dependentsfamilies woman girl formerly associated armed force group shall involved planning implementation monitoring integrated ddr process ensure need individual community addressed increased local ownership build support reintegration reconciliation effort support local peacebuilding recovery process", "ProcessedSent": "national local capacity must systematically developed follows n creating national local institutional capacity primary role un supply technical assistance training financial support national authority establish credible capable representative sustainable national institution programme", "SentID": 856 }, { "ParagraphID": 345, - "Paragraph": "National and local capacity must be systematically developed, as follows: \\n Creating national and local institutional capacity: A primary role of the UN is to supply technical assistance, training and financial support to national authorities to establish credible, capable, representative and sustainable national institutions and programmes. Such assistance should be based on an assessment and understanding of the particular context and the type of DDR activities to be implemented, including commitments to gender equality. \\n Finding implementing partners: Besides national institutions, civil society is a key partner in DDR. The technical capacity and expertise of civil society groups will often need to be strengthened, particularly when conflict has diminished human and financial resources. Particular attention should be paid to supporting the capacity development of women\u2019s civil society groups to ensure equal participation as partners in DDR. Doing so will help to create a sustainable environment for DDR and to ensure its long-term success. \\n Employing local communities and authorities: Local communities and authorities play an important role in ensuring the sustainability of DDR, particularly in support of reintegration and the implementation of DDR-related tools. Therefore, their capacities for strategic planning and programme and\/or financial management must be strengthened. Local authorities and populations, ex-combatants and their dependents\/families, and women and girls formerly associated with armed forces and groups shall all be involved in the planning, implementation and monitoring of integrated DDR processes. This is to ensure that the needs of both individuals and the community are addressed. Increased local ownership builds support for reintegration and reconciliation efforts and supports other local peacebuilding and recovery processes.", + "Paragraph": "National and local capacity must be systematically developed, as follows: \n Creating national and local institutional capacity: A primary role of the UN is to supply technical assistance, training and financial support to national authorities to establish credible, capable, representative and sustainable national institutions and programmes. Such assistance should be based on an assessment and understanding of the particular context and the type of DDR activities to be implemented, including commitments to gender equality. \n Finding implementing partners: Besides national institutions, civil society is a key partner in DDR. The technical capacity and expertise of civil society groups will often need to be strengthened, particularly when conflict has diminished human and financial resources. Particular attention should be paid to supporting the capacity development of women\u2019s civil society groups to ensure equal participation as partners in DDR. Doing so will help to create a sustainable environment for DDR and to ensure its long-term success. \n Employing local communities and authorities: Local communities and authorities play an important role in ensuring the sustainability of DDR, particularly in support of reintegration and the implementation of DDR-related tools. Therefore, their capacities for strategic planning and programme and\/or financial management must be strengthened. Local authorities and populations, ex-combatants and their dependents\/families, and women and girls formerly associated with armed forces and groups shall all be involved in the planning, implementation and monitoring of integrated DDR processes. This is to ensure that the needs of both individuals and the community are addressed. Increased local ownership builds support for reintegration and reconciliation efforts and supports other local peacebuilding and recovery processes.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -15445,7 +15445,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 345, - "Paragraph": "National and local capacity must be systematically developed, as follows: \\n Creating national and local institutional capacity: A primary role of the UN is to supply technical assistance, training and financial support to national authorities to establish credible, capable, representative and sustainable national institutions and programmes. Such assistance should be based on an assessment and understanding of the particular context and the type of DDR activities to be implemented, including commitments to gender equality. \\n Finding implementing partners: Besides national institutions, civil society is a key partner in DDR. The technical capacity and expertise of civil society groups will often need to be strengthened, particularly when conflict has diminished human and financial resources. Particular attention should be paid to supporting the capacity development of women\u2019s civil society groups to ensure equal participation as partners in DDR. Doing so will help to create a sustainable environment for DDR and to ensure its long-term success. \\n Employing local communities and authorities: Local communities and authorities play an important role in ensuring the sustainability of DDR, particularly in support of reintegration and the implementation of DDR-related tools. Therefore, their capacities for strategic planning and programme and\/or financial management must be strengthened. Local authorities and populations, ex-combatants and their dependents\/families, and women and girls formerly associated with armed forces and groups shall all be involved in the planning, implementation and monitoring of integrated DDR processes. This is to ensure that the needs of both individuals and the community are addressed. Increased local ownership builds support for reintegration and reconciliation efforts and supports other local peacebuilding and recovery processes.", + "Paragraph": "National and local capacity must be systematically developed, as follows: \n Creating national and local institutional capacity: A primary role of the UN is to supply technical assistance, training and financial support to national authorities to establish credible, capable, representative and sustainable national institutions and programmes. Such assistance should be based on an assessment and understanding of the particular context and the type of DDR activities to be implemented, including commitments to gender equality. \n Finding implementing partners: Besides national institutions, civil society is a key partner in DDR. The technical capacity and expertise of civil society groups will often need to be strengthened, particularly when conflict has diminished human and financial resources. Particular attention should be paid to supporting the capacity development of women\u2019s civil society groups to ensure equal participation as partners in DDR. Doing so will help to create a sustainable environment for DDR and to ensure its long-term success. \n Employing local communities and authorities: Local communities and authorities play an important role in ensuring the sustainability of DDR, particularly in support of reintegration and the implementation of DDR-related tools. Therefore, their capacities for strategic planning and programme and\/or financial management must be strengthened. Local authorities and populations, ex-combatants and their dependents\/families, and women and girls formerly associated with armed forces and groups shall all be involved in the planning, implementation and monitoring of integrated DDR processes. This is to ensure that the needs of both individuals and the community are addressed. Increased local ownership builds support for reintegration and reconciliation efforts and supports other local peacebuilding and recovery processes.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -15456,14 +15456,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.7. Nationally and locally owned", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Finding implementing partners: Besides national institutions, civil society is a key partner in DDR.", + "Sentence": "\n Finding implementing partners: Besides national institutions, civil society is a key partner in DDR.", "newParagraph": "national local capacity must systematically developed follows n creating national local institutional capacity primary role un supply technical assistance training financial support national authority establish credible capable representative sustainable national institution programme assistance based assessment understanding particular context type ddr activity implemented including commitment gender equality n finding implementing partner besides national institution civil society key partner ddr technical capacity expertise civil society group often need strengthened particularly conflict diminished human financial resource particular attention paid supporting capacity development woman civil society group ensure equal participation partner ddr help create sustainable environment ddr ensure longterm success n employing local community authority local community authority play important role ensuring sustainability ddr particularly support reintegration implementation ddrrelated tool therefore capacity strategic planning programme andor financial management must strengthened local authority population excombatants dependentsfamilies woman girl formerly associated armed force group shall involved planning implementation monitoring integrated ddr process ensure need individual community addressed increased local ownership build support reintegration reconciliation effort support local peacebuilding recovery process", "ProcessedSent": "n finding implementing partner besides national institution civil society key partner ddr", "SentID": 858 }, { "ParagraphID": 345, - "Paragraph": "National and local capacity must be systematically developed, as follows: \\n Creating national and local institutional capacity: A primary role of the UN is to supply technical assistance, training and financial support to national authorities to establish credible, capable, representative and sustainable national institutions and programmes. Such assistance should be based on an assessment and understanding of the particular context and the type of DDR activities to be implemented, including commitments to gender equality. \\n Finding implementing partners: Besides national institutions, civil society is a key partner in DDR. The technical capacity and expertise of civil society groups will often need to be strengthened, particularly when conflict has diminished human and financial resources. Particular attention should be paid to supporting the capacity development of women\u2019s civil society groups to ensure equal participation as partners in DDR. Doing so will help to create a sustainable environment for DDR and to ensure its long-term success. \\n Employing local communities and authorities: Local communities and authorities play an important role in ensuring the sustainability of DDR, particularly in support of reintegration and the implementation of DDR-related tools. Therefore, their capacities for strategic planning and programme and\/or financial management must be strengthened. Local authorities and populations, ex-combatants and their dependents\/families, and women and girls formerly associated with armed forces and groups shall all be involved in the planning, implementation and monitoring of integrated DDR processes. This is to ensure that the needs of both individuals and the community are addressed. Increased local ownership builds support for reintegration and reconciliation efforts and supports other local peacebuilding and recovery processes.", + "Paragraph": "National and local capacity must be systematically developed, as follows: \n Creating national and local institutional capacity: A primary role of the UN is to supply technical assistance, training and financial support to national authorities to establish credible, capable, representative and sustainable national institutions and programmes. Such assistance should be based on an assessment and understanding of the particular context and the type of DDR activities to be implemented, including commitments to gender equality. \n Finding implementing partners: Besides national institutions, civil society is a key partner in DDR. The technical capacity and expertise of civil society groups will often need to be strengthened, particularly when conflict has diminished human and financial resources. Particular attention should be paid to supporting the capacity development of women\u2019s civil society groups to ensure equal participation as partners in DDR. Doing so will help to create a sustainable environment for DDR and to ensure its long-term success. \n Employing local communities and authorities: Local communities and authorities play an important role in ensuring the sustainability of DDR, particularly in support of reintegration and the implementation of DDR-related tools. Therefore, their capacities for strategic planning and programme and\/or financial management must be strengthened. Local authorities and populations, ex-combatants and their dependents\/families, and women and girls formerly associated with armed forces and groups shall all be involved in the planning, implementation and monitoring of integrated DDR processes. This is to ensure that the needs of both individuals and the community are addressed. Increased local ownership builds support for reintegration and reconciliation efforts and supports other local peacebuilding and recovery processes.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -15481,7 +15481,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 345, - "Paragraph": "National and local capacity must be systematically developed, as follows: \\n Creating national and local institutional capacity: A primary role of the UN is to supply technical assistance, training and financial support to national authorities to establish credible, capable, representative and sustainable national institutions and programmes. Such assistance should be based on an assessment and understanding of the particular context and the type of DDR activities to be implemented, including commitments to gender equality. \\n Finding implementing partners: Besides national institutions, civil society is a key partner in DDR. The technical capacity and expertise of civil society groups will often need to be strengthened, particularly when conflict has diminished human and financial resources. Particular attention should be paid to supporting the capacity development of women\u2019s civil society groups to ensure equal participation as partners in DDR. Doing so will help to create a sustainable environment for DDR and to ensure its long-term success. \\n Employing local communities and authorities: Local communities and authorities play an important role in ensuring the sustainability of DDR, particularly in support of reintegration and the implementation of DDR-related tools. Therefore, their capacities for strategic planning and programme and\/or financial management must be strengthened. Local authorities and populations, ex-combatants and their dependents\/families, and women and girls formerly associated with armed forces and groups shall all be involved in the planning, implementation and monitoring of integrated DDR processes. This is to ensure that the needs of both individuals and the community are addressed. Increased local ownership builds support for reintegration and reconciliation efforts and supports other local peacebuilding and recovery processes.", + "Paragraph": "National and local capacity must be systematically developed, as follows: \n Creating national and local institutional capacity: A primary role of the UN is to supply technical assistance, training and financial support to national authorities to establish credible, capable, representative and sustainable national institutions and programmes. Such assistance should be based on an assessment and understanding of the particular context and the type of DDR activities to be implemented, including commitments to gender equality. \n Finding implementing partners: Besides national institutions, civil society is a key partner in DDR. The technical capacity and expertise of civil society groups will often need to be strengthened, particularly when conflict has diminished human and financial resources. Particular attention should be paid to supporting the capacity development of women\u2019s civil society groups to ensure equal participation as partners in DDR. Doing so will help to create a sustainable environment for DDR and to ensure its long-term success. \n Employing local communities and authorities: Local communities and authorities play an important role in ensuring the sustainability of DDR, particularly in support of reintegration and the implementation of DDR-related tools. Therefore, their capacities for strategic planning and programme and\/or financial management must be strengthened. Local authorities and populations, ex-combatants and their dependents\/families, and women and girls formerly associated with armed forces and groups shall all be involved in the planning, implementation and monitoring of integrated DDR processes. This is to ensure that the needs of both individuals and the community are addressed. Increased local ownership builds support for reintegration and reconciliation efforts and supports other local peacebuilding and recovery processes.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -15499,7 +15499,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 345, - "Paragraph": "National and local capacity must be systematically developed, as follows: \\n Creating national and local institutional capacity: A primary role of the UN is to supply technical assistance, training and financial support to national authorities to establish credible, capable, representative and sustainable national institutions and programmes. Such assistance should be based on an assessment and understanding of the particular context and the type of DDR activities to be implemented, including commitments to gender equality. \\n Finding implementing partners: Besides national institutions, civil society is a key partner in DDR. The technical capacity and expertise of civil society groups will often need to be strengthened, particularly when conflict has diminished human and financial resources. Particular attention should be paid to supporting the capacity development of women\u2019s civil society groups to ensure equal participation as partners in DDR. Doing so will help to create a sustainable environment for DDR and to ensure its long-term success. \\n Employing local communities and authorities: Local communities and authorities play an important role in ensuring the sustainability of DDR, particularly in support of reintegration and the implementation of DDR-related tools. Therefore, their capacities for strategic planning and programme and\/or financial management must be strengthened. Local authorities and populations, ex-combatants and their dependents\/families, and women and girls formerly associated with armed forces and groups shall all be involved in the planning, implementation and monitoring of integrated DDR processes. This is to ensure that the needs of both individuals and the community are addressed. Increased local ownership builds support for reintegration and reconciliation efforts and supports other local peacebuilding and recovery processes.", + "Paragraph": "National and local capacity must be systematically developed, as follows: \n Creating national and local institutional capacity: A primary role of the UN is to supply technical assistance, training and financial support to national authorities to establish credible, capable, representative and sustainable national institutions and programmes. Such assistance should be based on an assessment and understanding of the particular context and the type of DDR activities to be implemented, including commitments to gender equality. \n Finding implementing partners: Besides national institutions, civil society is a key partner in DDR. The technical capacity and expertise of civil society groups will often need to be strengthened, particularly when conflict has diminished human and financial resources. Particular attention should be paid to supporting the capacity development of women\u2019s civil society groups to ensure equal participation as partners in DDR. Doing so will help to create a sustainable environment for DDR and to ensure its long-term success. \n Employing local communities and authorities: Local communities and authorities play an important role in ensuring the sustainability of DDR, particularly in support of reintegration and the implementation of DDR-related tools. Therefore, their capacities for strategic planning and programme and\/or financial management must be strengthened. Local authorities and populations, ex-combatants and their dependents\/families, and women and girls formerly associated with armed forces and groups shall all be involved in the planning, implementation and monitoring of integrated DDR processes. This is to ensure that the needs of both individuals and the community are addressed. Increased local ownership builds support for reintegration and reconciliation efforts and supports other local peacebuilding and recovery processes.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -15517,7 +15517,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 345, - "Paragraph": "National and local capacity must be systematically developed, as follows: \\n Creating national and local institutional capacity: A primary role of the UN is to supply technical assistance, training and financial support to national authorities to establish credible, capable, representative and sustainable national institutions and programmes. Such assistance should be based on an assessment and understanding of the particular context and the type of DDR activities to be implemented, including commitments to gender equality. \\n Finding implementing partners: Besides national institutions, civil society is a key partner in DDR. The technical capacity and expertise of civil society groups will often need to be strengthened, particularly when conflict has diminished human and financial resources. Particular attention should be paid to supporting the capacity development of women\u2019s civil society groups to ensure equal participation as partners in DDR. Doing so will help to create a sustainable environment for DDR and to ensure its long-term success. \\n Employing local communities and authorities: Local communities and authorities play an important role in ensuring the sustainability of DDR, particularly in support of reintegration and the implementation of DDR-related tools. Therefore, their capacities for strategic planning and programme and\/or financial management must be strengthened. Local authorities and populations, ex-combatants and their dependents\/families, and women and girls formerly associated with armed forces and groups shall all be involved in the planning, implementation and monitoring of integrated DDR processes. This is to ensure that the needs of both individuals and the community are addressed. Increased local ownership builds support for reintegration and reconciliation efforts and supports other local peacebuilding and recovery processes.", + "Paragraph": "National and local capacity must be systematically developed, as follows: \n Creating national and local institutional capacity: A primary role of the UN is to supply technical assistance, training and financial support to national authorities to establish credible, capable, representative and sustainable national institutions and programmes. Such assistance should be based on an assessment and understanding of the particular context and the type of DDR activities to be implemented, including commitments to gender equality. \n Finding implementing partners: Besides national institutions, civil society is a key partner in DDR. The technical capacity and expertise of civil society groups will often need to be strengthened, particularly when conflict has diminished human and financial resources. Particular attention should be paid to supporting the capacity development of women\u2019s civil society groups to ensure equal participation as partners in DDR. Doing so will help to create a sustainable environment for DDR and to ensure its long-term success. \n Employing local communities and authorities: Local communities and authorities play an important role in ensuring the sustainability of DDR, particularly in support of reintegration and the implementation of DDR-related tools. Therefore, their capacities for strategic planning and programme and\/or financial management must be strengthened. Local authorities and populations, ex-combatants and their dependents\/families, and women and girls formerly associated with armed forces and groups shall all be involved in the planning, implementation and monitoring of integrated DDR processes. This is to ensure that the needs of both individuals and the community are addressed. Increased local ownership builds support for reintegration and reconciliation efforts and supports other local peacebuilding and recovery processes.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -15528,14 +15528,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.7. Nationally and locally owned", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Employing local communities and authorities: Local communities and authorities play an important role in ensuring the sustainability of DDR, particularly in support of reintegration and the implementation of DDR-related tools.", + "Sentence": "\n Employing local communities and authorities: Local communities and authorities play an important role in ensuring the sustainability of DDR, particularly in support of reintegration and the implementation of DDR-related tools.", "newParagraph": "national local capacity must systematically developed follows n creating national local institutional capacity primary role un supply technical assistance training financial support national authority establish credible capable representative sustainable national institution programme assistance based assessment understanding particular context type ddr activity implemented including commitment gender equality n finding implementing partner besides national institution civil society key partner ddr technical capacity expertise civil society group often need strengthened particularly conflict diminished human financial resource particular attention paid supporting capacity development woman civil society group ensure equal participation partner ddr help create sustainable environment ddr ensure longterm success n employing local community authority local community authority play important role ensuring sustainability ddr particularly support reintegration implementation ddrrelated tool therefore capacity strategic planning programme andor financial management must strengthened local authority population excombatants dependentsfamilies woman girl formerly associated armed force group shall involved planning implementation monitoring integrated ddr process ensure need individual community addressed increased local ownership build support reintegration reconciliation effort support local peacebuilding recovery process", "ProcessedSent": "n employing local community authority local community authority play important role ensuring sustainability ddr particularly support reintegration implementation ddrrelated tool", "SentID": 862 }, { "ParagraphID": 345, - "Paragraph": "National and local capacity must be systematically developed, as follows: \\n Creating national and local institutional capacity: A primary role of the UN is to supply technical assistance, training and financial support to national authorities to establish credible, capable, representative and sustainable national institutions and programmes. Such assistance should be based on an assessment and understanding of the particular context and the type of DDR activities to be implemented, including commitments to gender equality. \\n Finding implementing partners: Besides national institutions, civil society is a key partner in DDR. The technical capacity and expertise of civil society groups will often need to be strengthened, particularly when conflict has diminished human and financial resources. Particular attention should be paid to supporting the capacity development of women\u2019s civil society groups to ensure equal participation as partners in DDR. Doing so will help to create a sustainable environment for DDR and to ensure its long-term success. \\n Employing local communities and authorities: Local communities and authorities play an important role in ensuring the sustainability of DDR, particularly in support of reintegration and the implementation of DDR-related tools. Therefore, their capacities for strategic planning and programme and\/or financial management must be strengthened. Local authorities and populations, ex-combatants and their dependents\/families, and women and girls formerly associated with armed forces and groups shall all be involved in the planning, implementation and monitoring of integrated DDR processes. This is to ensure that the needs of both individuals and the community are addressed. Increased local ownership builds support for reintegration and reconciliation efforts and supports other local peacebuilding and recovery processes.", + "Paragraph": "National and local capacity must be systematically developed, as follows: \n Creating national and local institutional capacity: A primary role of the UN is to supply technical assistance, training and financial support to national authorities to establish credible, capable, representative and sustainable national institutions and programmes. Such assistance should be based on an assessment and understanding of the particular context and the type of DDR activities to be implemented, including commitments to gender equality. \n Finding implementing partners: Besides national institutions, civil society is a key partner in DDR. The technical capacity and expertise of civil society groups will often need to be strengthened, particularly when conflict has diminished human and financial resources. Particular attention should be paid to supporting the capacity development of women\u2019s civil society groups to ensure equal participation as partners in DDR. Doing so will help to create a sustainable environment for DDR and to ensure its long-term success. \n Employing local communities and authorities: Local communities and authorities play an important role in ensuring the sustainability of DDR, particularly in support of reintegration and the implementation of DDR-related tools. Therefore, their capacities for strategic planning and programme and\/or financial management must be strengthened. Local authorities and populations, ex-combatants and their dependents\/families, and women and girls formerly associated with armed forces and groups shall all be involved in the planning, implementation and monitoring of integrated DDR processes. This is to ensure that the needs of both individuals and the community are addressed. Increased local ownership builds support for reintegration and reconciliation efforts and supports other local peacebuilding and recovery processes.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -15553,7 +15553,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 345, - "Paragraph": "National and local capacity must be systematically developed, as follows: \\n Creating national and local institutional capacity: A primary role of the UN is to supply technical assistance, training and financial support to national authorities to establish credible, capable, representative and sustainable national institutions and programmes. Such assistance should be based on an assessment and understanding of the particular context and the type of DDR activities to be implemented, including commitments to gender equality. \\n Finding implementing partners: Besides national institutions, civil society is a key partner in DDR. The technical capacity and expertise of civil society groups will often need to be strengthened, particularly when conflict has diminished human and financial resources. Particular attention should be paid to supporting the capacity development of women\u2019s civil society groups to ensure equal participation as partners in DDR. Doing so will help to create a sustainable environment for DDR and to ensure its long-term success. \\n Employing local communities and authorities: Local communities and authorities play an important role in ensuring the sustainability of DDR, particularly in support of reintegration and the implementation of DDR-related tools. Therefore, their capacities for strategic planning and programme and\/or financial management must be strengthened. Local authorities and populations, ex-combatants and their dependents\/families, and women and girls formerly associated with armed forces and groups shall all be involved in the planning, implementation and monitoring of integrated DDR processes. This is to ensure that the needs of both individuals and the community are addressed. Increased local ownership builds support for reintegration and reconciliation efforts and supports other local peacebuilding and recovery processes.", + "Paragraph": "National and local capacity must be systematically developed, as follows: \n Creating national and local institutional capacity: A primary role of the UN is to supply technical assistance, training and financial support to national authorities to establish credible, capable, representative and sustainable national institutions and programmes. Such assistance should be based on an assessment and understanding of the particular context and the type of DDR activities to be implemented, including commitments to gender equality. \n Finding implementing partners: Besides national institutions, civil society is a key partner in DDR. The technical capacity and expertise of civil society groups will often need to be strengthened, particularly when conflict has diminished human and financial resources. Particular attention should be paid to supporting the capacity development of women\u2019s civil society groups to ensure equal participation as partners in DDR. Doing so will help to create a sustainable environment for DDR and to ensure its long-term success. \n Employing local communities and authorities: Local communities and authorities play an important role in ensuring the sustainability of DDR, particularly in support of reintegration and the implementation of DDR-related tools. Therefore, their capacities for strategic planning and programme and\/or financial management must be strengthened. Local authorities and populations, ex-combatants and their dependents\/families, and women and girls formerly associated with armed forces and groups shall all be involved in the planning, implementation and monitoring of integrated DDR processes. This is to ensure that the needs of both individuals and the community are addressed. Increased local ownership builds support for reintegration and reconciliation efforts and supports other local peacebuilding and recovery processes.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -15571,7 +15571,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 345, - "Paragraph": "National and local capacity must be systematically developed, as follows: \\n Creating national and local institutional capacity: A primary role of the UN is to supply technical assistance, training and financial support to national authorities to establish credible, capable, representative and sustainable national institutions and programmes. Such assistance should be based on an assessment and understanding of the particular context and the type of DDR activities to be implemented, including commitments to gender equality. \\n Finding implementing partners: Besides national institutions, civil society is a key partner in DDR. The technical capacity and expertise of civil society groups will often need to be strengthened, particularly when conflict has diminished human and financial resources. Particular attention should be paid to supporting the capacity development of women\u2019s civil society groups to ensure equal participation as partners in DDR. Doing so will help to create a sustainable environment for DDR and to ensure its long-term success. \\n Employing local communities and authorities: Local communities and authorities play an important role in ensuring the sustainability of DDR, particularly in support of reintegration and the implementation of DDR-related tools. Therefore, their capacities for strategic planning and programme and\/or financial management must be strengthened. Local authorities and populations, ex-combatants and their dependents\/families, and women and girls formerly associated with armed forces and groups shall all be involved in the planning, implementation and monitoring of integrated DDR processes. This is to ensure that the needs of both individuals and the community are addressed. Increased local ownership builds support for reintegration and reconciliation efforts and supports other local peacebuilding and recovery processes.", + "Paragraph": "National and local capacity must be systematically developed, as follows: \n Creating national and local institutional capacity: A primary role of the UN is to supply technical assistance, training and financial support to national authorities to establish credible, capable, representative and sustainable national institutions and programmes. Such assistance should be based on an assessment and understanding of the particular context and the type of DDR activities to be implemented, including commitments to gender equality. \n Finding implementing partners: Besides national institutions, civil society is a key partner in DDR. The technical capacity and expertise of civil society groups will often need to be strengthened, particularly when conflict has diminished human and financial resources. Particular attention should be paid to supporting the capacity development of women\u2019s civil society groups to ensure equal participation as partners in DDR. Doing so will help to create a sustainable environment for DDR and to ensure its long-term success. \n Employing local communities and authorities: Local communities and authorities play an important role in ensuring the sustainability of DDR, particularly in support of reintegration and the implementation of DDR-related tools. Therefore, their capacities for strategic planning and programme and\/or financial management must be strengthened. Local authorities and populations, ex-combatants and their dependents\/families, and women and girls formerly associated with armed forces and groups shall all be involved in the planning, implementation and monitoring of integrated DDR processes. This is to ensure that the needs of both individuals and the community are addressed. Increased local ownership builds support for reintegration and reconciliation efforts and supports other local peacebuilding and recovery processes.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -15589,7 +15589,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 345, - "Paragraph": "National and local capacity must be systematically developed, as follows: \\n Creating national and local institutional capacity: A primary role of the UN is to supply technical assistance, training and financial support to national authorities to establish credible, capable, representative and sustainable national institutions and programmes. Such assistance should be based on an assessment and understanding of the particular context and the type of DDR activities to be implemented, including commitments to gender equality. \\n Finding implementing partners: Besides national institutions, civil society is a key partner in DDR. The technical capacity and expertise of civil society groups will often need to be strengthened, particularly when conflict has diminished human and financial resources. Particular attention should be paid to supporting the capacity development of women\u2019s civil society groups to ensure equal participation as partners in DDR. Doing so will help to create a sustainable environment for DDR and to ensure its long-term success. \\n Employing local communities and authorities: Local communities and authorities play an important role in ensuring the sustainability of DDR, particularly in support of reintegration and the implementation of DDR-related tools. Therefore, their capacities for strategic planning and programme and\/or financial management must be strengthened. Local authorities and populations, ex-combatants and their dependents\/families, and women and girls formerly associated with armed forces and groups shall all be involved in the planning, implementation and monitoring of integrated DDR processes. This is to ensure that the needs of both individuals and the community are addressed. Increased local ownership builds support for reintegration and reconciliation efforts and supports other local peacebuilding and recovery processes.", + "Paragraph": "National and local capacity must be systematically developed, as follows: \n Creating national and local institutional capacity: A primary role of the UN is to supply technical assistance, training and financial support to national authorities to establish credible, capable, representative and sustainable national institutions and programmes. Such assistance should be based on an assessment and understanding of the particular context and the type of DDR activities to be implemented, including commitments to gender equality. \n Finding implementing partners: Besides national institutions, civil society is a key partner in DDR. The technical capacity and expertise of civil society groups will often need to be strengthened, particularly when conflict has diminished human and financial resources. Particular attention should be paid to supporting the capacity development of women\u2019s civil society groups to ensure equal participation as partners in DDR. Doing so will help to create a sustainable environment for DDR and to ensure its long-term success. \n Employing local communities and authorities: Local communities and authorities play an important role in ensuring the sustainability of DDR, particularly in support of reintegration and the implementation of DDR-related tools. Therefore, their capacities for strategic planning and programme and\/or financial management must be strengthened. Local authorities and populations, ex-combatants and their dependents\/families, and women and girls formerly associated with armed forces and groups shall all be involved in the planning, implementation and monitoring of integrated DDR processes. This is to ensure that the needs of both individuals and the community are addressed. Increased local ownership builds support for reintegration and reconciliation efforts and supports other local peacebuilding and recovery processes.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -16453,7 +16453,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 362, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\na) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\nb) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\nc) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\nd) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \\ne) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \na) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \nb) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \nc) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \nd) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \ne) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -16471,7 +16471,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 362, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\na) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\nb) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\nc) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\nd) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \\ne) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \na) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \nb) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \nc) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \nd) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \ne) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -16482,7 +16482,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\na) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\nb) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\nc) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\nd) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \\ne) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \na) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \nb) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \nc) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \nd) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \ne) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may must used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline na shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard nb used indicate preferred requirement method specification nc may used indicate possible method course action nd used indicate possibility capability ne must used indicate external constraint obligation", "ProcessedSent": "use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline na shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard nb used indicate preferred requirement method specification nc may used indicate possible method course action nd used indicate possibility capability ne must used indicate external constraint obligation", "SentID": 915 @@ -16849,7 +16849,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 370, - "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \\n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \\n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \\n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \\n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \\n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \\n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", + "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -16867,7 +16867,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 370, - "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \\n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \\n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \\n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \\n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \\n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \\n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", + "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -16885,7 +16885,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 370, - "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \\n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \\n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \\n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \\n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \\n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \\n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", + "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -16896,14 +16896,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Abide by the applicable legal framework.", + "Sentence": "\n Abide by the applicable legal framework.", "newParagraph": "iddrs 210 un approach ddr set main principle guide aspect un supported ddr process addition principle following general guiding principle related specifically legal framework apply carrying ddr process n abide applicable legal framework applicable legal framework core consideration stage drafting designing executing evaluating ddr process failure abide applicable legal framework may result consequence un entity involved un generally including possible liability may also lead personal accountability ddr practitioner involved n know mandate ddr practitioner familiar source scope mandate extent involvement ddr process requires coordination andor cooperation un system actor also know respective role responsibility actor peace agreement exists one first document ddr practitioner consult understand framework carry ddr process n develop concept operation conops ddr practitioner common agreed approach order ensure coherence amongst un systemsupported ddr process coordination among various un system actor conducting ddr particular context achieved written conops developed consultation necessary relevant headquarters conops also adjusted include legal obligation un system actor n develop operationspecific standard operating procedure sop guideline ddr consistent conops ddr practitioner consider developing operationspecific sop guideline may address instance standard cooperation criminal justice accountability process measure controlling access ddr encampment installation measure safe handling destruction weapon ammunition relevant issue may also include reference explanation applicable legal standard n include legal consideration relevant project document general legal consideration integrated addressed appropriate relevant written project document including agreed host state n seek legal advice general matter ddr practitioner seek legal advice doubt whether situation raise legal concern particular ddr practitioner seek advice foresee new element significant change ddr process eg new type activity new partner involved important know advice may requested obtained familiarity legal office incountry clear channel communication seeking expeditious advice headquarters critical", "ProcessedSent": "n abide applicable legal framework", "SentID": 938 }, { "ParagraphID": 370, - "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \\n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \\n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \\n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \\n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \\n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \\n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", + "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -16921,7 +16921,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 370, - "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \\n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \\n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \\n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \\n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \\n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \\n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", + "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -16939,7 +16939,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 370, - "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \\n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \\n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \\n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \\n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \\n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \\n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", + "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -16957,7 +16957,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 370, - "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \\n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \\n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \\n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \\n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \\n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \\n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", + "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -16968,14 +16968,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Know your mandate.", + "Sentence": "\n Know your mandate.", "newParagraph": "iddrs 210 un approach ddr set main principle guide aspect un supported ddr process addition principle following general guiding principle related specifically legal framework apply carrying ddr process n abide applicable legal framework applicable legal framework core consideration stage drafting designing executing evaluating ddr process failure abide applicable legal framework may result consequence un entity involved un generally including possible liability may also lead personal accountability ddr practitioner involved n know mandate ddr practitioner familiar source scope mandate extent involvement ddr process requires coordination andor cooperation un system actor also know respective role responsibility actor peace agreement exists one first document ddr practitioner consult understand framework carry ddr process n develop concept operation conops ddr practitioner common agreed approach order ensure coherence amongst un systemsupported ddr process coordination among various un system actor conducting ddr particular context achieved written conops developed consultation necessary relevant headquarters conops also adjusted include legal obligation un system actor n develop operationspecific standard operating procedure sop guideline ddr consistent conops ddr practitioner consider developing operationspecific sop guideline may address instance standard cooperation criminal justice accountability process measure controlling access ddr encampment installation measure safe handling destruction weapon ammunition relevant issue may also include reference explanation applicable legal standard n include legal consideration relevant project document general legal consideration integrated addressed appropriate relevant written project document including agreed host state n seek legal advice general matter ddr practitioner seek legal advice doubt whether situation raise legal concern particular ddr practitioner seek advice foresee new element significant change ddr process eg new type activity new partner involved important know advice may requested obtained familiarity legal office incountry clear channel communication seeking expeditious advice headquarters critical", "ProcessedSent": "n know mandate", "SentID": 942 }, { "ParagraphID": 370, - "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \\n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \\n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \\n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \\n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \\n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \\n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", + "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -16993,7 +16993,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 370, - "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \\n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \\n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \\n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \\n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \\n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \\n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", + "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -17011,7 +17011,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 370, - "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \\n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \\n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \\n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \\n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \\n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \\n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", + "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -17029,7 +17029,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 370, - "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \\n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \\n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \\n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \\n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \\n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \\n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", + "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -17040,14 +17040,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS).", + "Sentence": "\n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS).", "newParagraph": "iddrs 210 un approach ddr set main principle guide aspect un supported ddr process addition principle following general guiding principle related specifically legal framework apply carrying ddr process n abide applicable legal framework applicable legal framework core consideration stage drafting designing executing evaluating ddr process failure abide applicable legal framework may result consequence un entity involved un generally including possible liability may also lead personal accountability ddr practitioner involved n know mandate ddr practitioner familiar source scope mandate extent involvement ddr process requires coordination andor cooperation un system actor also know respective role responsibility actor peace agreement exists one first document ddr practitioner consult understand framework carry ddr process n develop concept operation conops ddr practitioner common agreed approach order ensure coherence amongst un systemsupported ddr process coordination among various un system actor conducting ddr particular context achieved written conops developed consultation necessary relevant headquarters conops also adjusted include legal obligation un system actor n develop operationspecific standard operating procedure sop guideline ddr consistent conops ddr practitioner consider developing operationspecific sop guideline may address instance standard cooperation criminal justice accountability process measure controlling access ddr encampment installation measure safe handling destruction weapon ammunition relevant issue may also include reference explanation applicable legal standard n include legal consideration relevant project document general legal consideration integrated addressed appropriate relevant written project document including agreed host state n seek legal advice general matter ddr practitioner seek legal advice doubt whether situation raise legal concern particular ddr practitioner seek advice foresee new element significant change ddr process eg new type activity new partner involved important know advice may requested obtained familiarity legal office incountry clear channel communication seeking expeditious advice headquarters critical", "ProcessedSent": "n develop concept operation conops", "SentID": 946 }, { "ParagraphID": 370, - "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \\n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \\n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \\n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \\n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \\n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \\n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", + "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -17065,7 +17065,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 370, - "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \\n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \\n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \\n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \\n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \\n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \\n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", + "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -17083,7 +17083,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 370, - "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \\n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \\n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \\n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \\n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \\n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \\n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", + "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -17101,7 +17101,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 370, - "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \\n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \\n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \\n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \\n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \\n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \\n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", + "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -17112,14 +17112,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR.", + "Sentence": "\n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR.", "newParagraph": "iddrs 210 un approach ddr set main principle guide aspect un supported ddr process addition principle following general guiding principle related specifically legal framework apply carrying ddr process n abide applicable legal framework applicable legal framework core consideration stage drafting designing executing evaluating ddr process failure abide applicable legal framework may result consequence un entity involved un generally including possible liability may also lead personal accountability ddr practitioner involved n know mandate ddr practitioner familiar source scope mandate extent involvement ddr process requires coordination andor cooperation un system actor also know respective role responsibility actor peace agreement exists one first document ddr practitioner consult understand framework carry ddr process n develop concept operation conops ddr practitioner common agreed approach order ensure coherence amongst un systemsupported ddr process coordination among various un system actor conducting ddr particular context achieved written conops developed consultation necessary relevant headquarters conops also adjusted include legal obligation un system actor n develop operationspecific standard operating procedure sop guideline ddr consistent conops ddr practitioner consider developing operationspecific sop guideline may address instance standard cooperation criminal justice accountability process measure controlling access ddr encampment installation measure safe handling destruction weapon ammunition relevant issue may also include reference explanation applicable legal standard n include legal consideration relevant project document general legal consideration integrated addressed appropriate relevant written project document including agreed host state n seek legal advice general matter ddr practitioner seek legal advice doubt whether situation raise legal concern particular ddr practitioner seek advice foresee new element significant change ddr process eg new type activity new partner involved important know advice may requested obtained familiarity legal office incountry clear channel communication seeking expeditious advice headquarters critical", "ProcessedSent": "n develop operationspecific standard operating procedure sop guideline ddr", "SentID": 950 }, { "ParagraphID": 370, - "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \\n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \\n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \\n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \\n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \\n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \\n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", + "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -17137,7 +17137,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 370, - "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \\n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \\n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \\n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \\n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \\n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \\n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", + "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -17155,7 +17155,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 370, - "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \\n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \\n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \\n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \\n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \\n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \\n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", + "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -17173,7 +17173,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 370, - "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \\n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \\n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \\n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \\n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \\n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \\n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", + "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -17184,14 +17184,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents.", + "Sentence": "\n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents.", "newParagraph": "iddrs 210 un approach ddr set main principle guide aspect un supported ddr process addition principle following general guiding principle related specifically legal framework apply carrying ddr process n abide applicable legal framework applicable legal framework core consideration stage drafting designing executing evaluating ddr process failure abide applicable legal framework may result consequence un entity involved un generally including possible liability may also lead personal accountability ddr practitioner involved n know mandate ddr practitioner familiar source scope mandate extent involvement ddr process requires coordination andor cooperation un system actor also know respective role responsibility actor peace agreement exists one first document ddr practitioner consult understand framework carry ddr process n develop concept operation conops ddr practitioner common agreed approach order ensure coherence amongst un systemsupported ddr process coordination among various un system actor conducting ddr particular context achieved written conops developed consultation necessary relevant headquarters conops also adjusted include legal obligation un system actor n develop operationspecific standard operating procedure sop guideline ddr consistent conops ddr practitioner consider developing operationspecific sop guideline may address instance standard cooperation criminal justice accountability process measure controlling access ddr encampment installation measure safe handling destruction weapon ammunition relevant issue may also include reference explanation applicable legal standard n include legal consideration relevant project document general legal consideration integrated addressed appropriate relevant written project document including agreed host state n seek legal advice general matter ddr practitioner seek legal advice doubt whether situation raise legal concern particular ddr practitioner seek advice foresee new element significant change ddr process eg new type activity new partner involved important know advice may requested obtained familiarity legal office incountry clear channel communication seeking expeditious advice headquarters critical", "ProcessedSent": "n include legal consideration relevant project document", "SentID": 954 }, { "ParagraphID": 370, - "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \\n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \\n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \\n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \\n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \\n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \\n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", + "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -17209,7 +17209,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 370, - "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \\n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \\n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \\n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \\n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \\n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \\n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", + "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -17220,14 +17220,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Seek legal advice.", + "Sentence": "\n Seek legal advice.", "newParagraph": "iddrs 210 un approach ddr set main principle guide aspect un supported ddr process addition principle following general guiding principle related specifically legal framework apply carrying ddr process n abide applicable legal framework applicable legal framework core consideration stage drafting designing executing evaluating ddr process failure abide applicable legal framework may result consequence un entity involved un generally including possible liability may also lead personal accountability ddr practitioner involved n know mandate ddr practitioner familiar source scope mandate extent involvement ddr process requires coordination andor cooperation un system actor also know respective role responsibility actor peace agreement exists one first document ddr practitioner consult understand framework carry ddr process n develop concept operation conops ddr practitioner common agreed approach order ensure coherence amongst un systemsupported ddr process coordination among various un system actor conducting ddr particular context achieved written conops developed consultation necessary relevant headquarters conops also adjusted include legal obligation un system actor n develop operationspecific standard operating procedure sop guideline ddr consistent conops ddr practitioner consider developing operationspecific sop guideline may address instance standard cooperation criminal justice accountability process measure controlling access ddr encampment installation measure safe handling destruction weapon ammunition relevant issue may also include reference explanation applicable legal standard n include legal consideration relevant project document general legal consideration integrated addressed appropriate relevant written project document including agreed host state n seek legal advice general matter ddr practitioner seek legal advice doubt whether situation raise legal concern particular ddr practitioner seek advice foresee new element significant change ddr process eg new type activity new partner involved important know advice may requested obtained familiarity legal office incountry clear channel communication seeking expeditious advice headquarters critical", "ProcessedSent": "n seek legal advice", "SentID": 956 }, { "ParagraphID": 370, - "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \\n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \\n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \\n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \\n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \\n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \\n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", + "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -17245,7 +17245,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 370, - "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \\n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \\n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \\n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \\n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \\n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \\n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", + "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -17263,7 +17263,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 370, - "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \\n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \\n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \\n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \\n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \\n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \\n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", + "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -17281,7 +17281,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 370, - "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \\n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \\n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \\n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \\n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \\n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \\n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", + "Paragraph": "IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR sets out the main principles that guide all aspects of UN supported DDR processes. In addition to these principles, the following general guiding principles related specifically to the legal framework apply when carrying out DDR processes. \n Abide by the applicable legal framework. The applicable legal framework should be a core consideration at all stages, when drafting, designing, executing and evaluating DDR processes. Failure to abide by the applicable legal framework may result in consequences for the UN entity involved and the UN more generally, including possible liabilities. It may also lead to personal accountability for the DDR practitioner(s) involved. \n Know your mandate. DDR practitioners should be familiar with the source and scope of their mandate. To the extent that their involvement in the DDR process requires coordination and\/or cooperation with other UN system actors, they should also know the respective roles and responsibilities of those other actors. If a peace agreement exists, it should be one of the first documents that DDR practitioners consult to understand the framework in which they will carry out the DDR process. \n Develop a concept of operations (CONOPS). DDR practitioners should have a common, agreed approach in order to ensure coherence amongst UN system-supported DDR processes and coordination among the various UN system actors that are conducting DDR in a particular context. This can be achieved through a written CONOPS, developed in consultation, as necessary, with the relevant headquarters. The CONOPS can also be adjusted to include the legal obligations of the UN system actor. \n Develop operation-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) or guidelines for DDR. Consistent with the CONOPS, DDR practitioners should consider developing operation-specific SOPs or guidelines. These may address, for instance, standards for cooperation with criminal justice and other accountability processes, measures for controlling access to DDR encampments or other installations, measures for the safe handling and destruction of weapons and ammunition, and other relevant issues. They may also include references to, and explanations of, the applicable legal standards. \n Include legal considerations in all relevant project documents. In general, legal considerations should be integrated and addressed, as appropriate, in all relevant written project documents, including those agreed with the host State. \n Seek legal advice. As a general matter, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice when they are in doubt as to whether a situation raises legal concerns. In particular, DDR practitioners should seek advice when they foresee new elements or significant changes in their DDR processes (e.g., when a new type of activity or new partners are involved). It is important to know where, and how, such advice may be requested and obtained. Familiarity with the legal office in-country and having clear channels of communication for seeking expeditious advice from headquarters are critical.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -17677,7 +17677,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 379, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be familiar with the most recent documents establishing the mandate to conduct DDR processes, specifically, the source and scope of that mandate. \\n When starting a new form of activity related to the DDR process, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if there is doubt as to whether this new form of activity is authorized under the mandate of their particular entity. \\n When starting a new form of activity related to the DDR process, DDR practitioners should ensure coordination with other relevant initiatives. \\n Peace agreements, in themselves, do not provide UN entities with a mandate to support DDR. It is the reference to the peace agreement in the mandate of the DDR practitioner\u2019s particular entity that makes the peace agreement (and the accompanying DDR policy document) relevant. This mandate may set boundaries regarding what DDR practitioners can do or how they go about their jobs.", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be familiar with the most recent documents establishing the mandate to conduct DDR processes, specifically, the source and scope of that mandate. \n When starting a new form of activity related to the DDR process, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if there is doubt as to whether this new form of activity is authorized under the mandate of their particular entity. \n When starting a new form of activity related to the DDR process, DDR practitioners should ensure coordination with other relevant initiatives. \n Peace agreements, in themselves, do not provide UN entities with a mandate to support DDR. It is the reference to the peace agreement in the mandate of the DDR practitioner\u2019s particular entity that makes the peace agreement (and the accompanying DDR policy document) relevant. This mandate may set boundaries regarding what DDR practitioners can do or how they go about their jobs.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -17688,14 +17688,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.1 Mandate ", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be familiar with the most recent documents establishing the mandate to conduct DDR processes, specifically, the source and scope of that mandate.", + "Sentence": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be familiar with the most recent documents establishing the mandate to conduct DDR processes, specifically, the source and scope of that mandate.", "newParagraph": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner familiar recent document establishing mandate conduct ddr process specifically source scope mandate n starting new form activity related ddr process ddr practitioner seek legal advice doubt whether new form activity authorized mandate particular entity n starting new form activity related ddr process ddr practitioner ensure coordination relevant initiative n peace agreement provide un entity mandate support ddr reference peace agreement mandate ddr practitioner particular entity make peace agreement accompanying ddr policy document relevant mandate may set boundary regarding ddr practitioner go job", "ProcessedSent": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner familiar recent document establishing mandate conduct ddr process specifically source scope mandate", "SentID": 982 }, { "ParagraphID": 379, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be familiar with the most recent documents establishing the mandate to conduct DDR processes, specifically, the source and scope of that mandate. \\n When starting a new form of activity related to the DDR process, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if there is doubt as to whether this new form of activity is authorized under the mandate of their particular entity. \\n When starting a new form of activity related to the DDR process, DDR practitioners should ensure coordination with other relevant initiatives. \\n Peace agreements, in themselves, do not provide UN entities with a mandate to support DDR. It is the reference to the peace agreement in the mandate of the DDR practitioner\u2019s particular entity that makes the peace agreement (and the accompanying DDR policy document) relevant. This mandate may set boundaries regarding what DDR practitioners can do or how they go about their jobs.", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be familiar with the most recent documents establishing the mandate to conduct DDR processes, specifically, the source and scope of that mandate. \n When starting a new form of activity related to the DDR process, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if there is doubt as to whether this new form of activity is authorized under the mandate of their particular entity. \n When starting a new form of activity related to the DDR process, DDR practitioners should ensure coordination with other relevant initiatives. \n Peace agreements, in themselves, do not provide UN entities with a mandate to support DDR. It is the reference to the peace agreement in the mandate of the DDR practitioner\u2019s particular entity that makes the peace agreement (and the accompanying DDR policy document) relevant. This mandate may set boundaries regarding what DDR practitioners can do or how they go about their jobs.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -17706,14 +17706,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.1 Mandate ", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n When starting a new form of activity related to the DDR process, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if there is doubt as to whether this new form of activity is authorized under the mandate of their particular entity.", + "Sentence": "\n When starting a new form of activity related to the DDR process, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if there is doubt as to whether this new form of activity is authorized under the mandate of their particular entity.", "newParagraph": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner familiar recent document establishing mandate conduct ddr process specifically source scope mandate n starting new form activity related ddr process ddr practitioner seek legal advice doubt whether new form activity authorized mandate particular entity n starting new form activity related ddr process ddr practitioner ensure coordination relevant initiative n peace agreement provide un entity mandate support ddr reference peace agreement mandate ddr practitioner particular entity make peace agreement accompanying ddr policy document relevant mandate may set boundary regarding ddr practitioner go job", "ProcessedSent": "n starting new form activity related ddr process ddr practitioner seek legal advice doubt whether new form activity authorized mandate particular entity", "SentID": 983 }, { "ParagraphID": 379, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be familiar with the most recent documents establishing the mandate to conduct DDR processes, specifically, the source and scope of that mandate. \\n When starting a new form of activity related to the DDR process, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if there is doubt as to whether this new form of activity is authorized under the mandate of their particular entity. \\n When starting a new form of activity related to the DDR process, DDR practitioners should ensure coordination with other relevant initiatives. \\n Peace agreements, in themselves, do not provide UN entities with a mandate to support DDR. It is the reference to the peace agreement in the mandate of the DDR practitioner\u2019s particular entity that makes the peace agreement (and the accompanying DDR policy document) relevant. This mandate may set boundaries regarding what DDR practitioners can do or how they go about their jobs.", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be familiar with the most recent documents establishing the mandate to conduct DDR processes, specifically, the source and scope of that mandate. \n When starting a new form of activity related to the DDR process, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if there is doubt as to whether this new form of activity is authorized under the mandate of their particular entity. \n When starting a new form of activity related to the DDR process, DDR practitioners should ensure coordination with other relevant initiatives. \n Peace agreements, in themselves, do not provide UN entities with a mandate to support DDR. It is the reference to the peace agreement in the mandate of the DDR practitioner\u2019s particular entity that makes the peace agreement (and the accompanying DDR policy document) relevant. This mandate may set boundaries regarding what DDR practitioners can do or how they go about their jobs.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -17724,14 +17724,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.1 Mandate ", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n When starting a new form of activity related to the DDR process, DDR practitioners should ensure coordination with other relevant initiatives.", + "Sentence": "\n When starting a new form of activity related to the DDR process, DDR practitioners should ensure coordination with other relevant initiatives.", "newParagraph": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner familiar recent document establishing mandate conduct ddr process specifically source scope mandate n starting new form activity related ddr process ddr practitioner seek legal advice doubt whether new form activity authorized mandate particular entity n starting new form activity related ddr process ddr practitioner ensure coordination relevant initiative n peace agreement provide un entity mandate support ddr reference peace agreement mandate ddr practitioner particular entity make peace agreement accompanying ddr policy document relevant mandate may set boundary regarding ddr practitioner go job", "ProcessedSent": "n starting new form activity related ddr process ddr practitioner ensure coordination relevant initiative", "SentID": 984 }, { "ParagraphID": 379, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be familiar with the most recent documents establishing the mandate to conduct DDR processes, specifically, the source and scope of that mandate. \\n When starting a new form of activity related to the DDR process, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if there is doubt as to whether this new form of activity is authorized under the mandate of their particular entity. \\n When starting a new form of activity related to the DDR process, DDR practitioners should ensure coordination with other relevant initiatives. \\n Peace agreements, in themselves, do not provide UN entities with a mandate to support DDR. It is the reference to the peace agreement in the mandate of the DDR practitioner\u2019s particular entity that makes the peace agreement (and the accompanying DDR policy document) relevant. This mandate may set boundaries regarding what DDR practitioners can do or how they go about their jobs.", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be familiar with the most recent documents establishing the mandate to conduct DDR processes, specifically, the source and scope of that mandate. \n When starting a new form of activity related to the DDR process, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if there is doubt as to whether this new form of activity is authorized under the mandate of their particular entity. \n When starting a new form of activity related to the DDR process, DDR practitioners should ensure coordination with other relevant initiatives. \n Peace agreements, in themselves, do not provide UN entities with a mandate to support DDR. It is the reference to the peace agreement in the mandate of the DDR practitioner\u2019s particular entity that makes the peace agreement (and the accompanying DDR policy document) relevant. This mandate may set boundaries regarding what DDR practitioners can do or how they go about their jobs.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -17742,14 +17742,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.1 Mandate ", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Peace agreements, in themselves, do not provide UN entities with a mandate to support DDR.", + "Sentence": "\n Peace agreements, in themselves, do not provide UN entities with a mandate to support DDR.", "newParagraph": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner familiar recent document establishing mandate conduct ddr process specifically source scope mandate n starting new form activity related ddr process ddr practitioner seek legal advice doubt whether new form activity authorized mandate particular entity n starting new form activity related ddr process ddr practitioner ensure coordination relevant initiative n peace agreement provide un entity mandate support ddr reference peace agreement mandate ddr practitioner particular entity make peace agreement accompanying ddr policy document relevant mandate may set boundary regarding ddr practitioner go job", "ProcessedSent": "n peace agreement provide un entity mandate support ddr", "SentID": 985 }, { "ParagraphID": 379, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be familiar with the most recent documents establishing the mandate to conduct DDR processes, specifically, the source and scope of that mandate. \\n When starting a new form of activity related to the DDR process, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if there is doubt as to whether this new form of activity is authorized under the mandate of their particular entity. \\n When starting a new form of activity related to the DDR process, DDR practitioners should ensure coordination with other relevant initiatives. \\n Peace agreements, in themselves, do not provide UN entities with a mandate to support DDR. It is the reference to the peace agreement in the mandate of the DDR practitioner\u2019s particular entity that makes the peace agreement (and the accompanying DDR policy document) relevant. This mandate may set boundaries regarding what DDR practitioners can do or how they go about their jobs.", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be familiar with the most recent documents establishing the mandate to conduct DDR processes, specifically, the source and scope of that mandate. \n When starting a new form of activity related to the DDR process, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if there is doubt as to whether this new form of activity is authorized under the mandate of their particular entity. \n When starting a new form of activity related to the DDR process, DDR practitioners should ensure coordination with other relevant initiatives. \n Peace agreements, in themselves, do not provide UN entities with a mandate to support DDR. It is the reference to the peace agreement in the mandate of the DDR practitioner\u2019s particular entity that makes the peace agreement (and the accompanying DDR policy document) relevant. This mandate may set boundaries regarding what DDR practitioners can do or how they go about their jobs.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -17767,7 +17767,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 379, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be familiar with the most recent documents establishing the mandate to conduct DDR processes, specifically, the source and scope of that mandate. \\n When starting a new form of activity related to the DDR process, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if there is doubt as to whether this new form of activity is authorized under the mandate of their particular entity. \\n When starting a new form of activity related to the DDR process, DDR practitioners should ensure coordination with other relevant initiatives. \\n Peace agreements, in themselves, do not provide UN entities with a mandate to support DDR. It is the reference to the peace agreement in the mandate of the DDR practitioner\u2019s particular entity that makes the peace agreement (and the accompanying DDR policy document) relevant. This mandate may set boundaries regarding what DDR practitioners can do or how they go about their jobs.", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be familiar with the most recent documents establishing the mandate to conduct DDR processes, specifically, the source and scope of that mandate. \n When starting a new form of activity related to the DDR process, DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if there is doubt as to whether this new form of activity is authorized under the mandate of their particular entity. \n When starting a new form of activity related to the DDR process, DDR practitioners should ensure coordination with other relevant initiatives. \n Peace agreements, in themselves, do not provide UN entities with a mandate to support DDR. It is the reference to the peace agreement in the mandate of the DDR practitioner\u2019s particular entity that makes the peace agreement (and the accompanying DDR policy document) relevant. This mandate may set boundaries regarding what DDR practitioners can do or how they go about their jobs.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -18199,7 +18199,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 388, - "Paragraph": "IHL may nevertheless apply to the wider context within which a DDR process is situated. For example, when national authorities, for whatever purpose, wish to take into custody persons enrolled in DDR processes, the UN peacekeeping operation or other UN system actor concerned should take measures to ensure that those national authorities will treat the persons concerned in accordance with their obligations under IHL, and international human rights and refugee laws, where applicable. \\n\\nSpecific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the conditions of DDR facilities, particularly with respect to the voluntariness of the presence and involvement of DDR participants and beneficiaries (see IDDRS 3.10 on Participants, Beneficiaries and Partners). \\n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the fact that IHL may apply to the wider context within which DDR processes are situated. Safeguards should be put in place to ensure compliance with IHL and international human rights and refugee laws by the host State authorities. \\n\\n Red lines \\nParticipation in DDR processes shall be voluntary at all times. DDR participants and beneficiaries are not detained, interned or otherwise deprived of their liberty. DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if there are concerns about the voluntariness of involvement in DDR processes", + "Paragraph": "IHL may nevertheless apply to the wider context within which a DDR process is situated. For example, when national authorities, for whatever purpose, wish to take into custody persons enrolled in DDR processes, the UN peacekeeping operation or other UN system actor concerned should take measures to ensure that those national authorities will treat the persons concerned in accordance with their obligations under IHL, and international human rights and refugee laws, where applicable. \n\nSpecific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the conditions of DDR facilities, particularly with respect to the voluntariness of the presence and involvement of DDR participants and beneficiaries (see IDDRS 3.10 on Participants, Beneficiaries and Partners). \n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the fact that IHL may apply to the wider context within which DDR processes are situated. Safeguards should be put in place to ensure compliance with IHL and international human rights and refugee laws by the host State authorities. \n\n Red lines \nParticipation in DDR processes shall be voluntary at all times. DDR participants and beneficiaries are not detained, interned or otherwise deprived of their liberty. DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if there are concerns about the voluntariness of involvement in DDR processes", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -18217,7 +18217,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 388, - "Paragraph": "IHL may nevertheless apply to the wider context within which a DDR process is situated. For example, when national authorities, for whatever purpose, wish to take into custody persons enrolled in DDR processes, the UN peacekeeping operation or other UN system actor concerned should take measures to ensure that those national authorities will treat the persons concerned in accordance with their obligations under IHL, and international human rights and refugee laws, where applicable. \\n\\nSpecific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the conditions of DDR facilities, particularly with respect to the voluntariness of the presence and involvement of DDR participants and beneficiaries (see IDDRS 3.10 on Participants, Beneficiaries and Partners). \\n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the fact that IHL may apply to the wider context within which DDR processes are situated. Safeguards should be put in place to ensure compliance with IHL and international human rights and refugee laws by the host State authorities. \\n\\n Red lines \\nParticipation in DDR processes shall be voluntary at all times. DDR participants and beneficiaries are not detained, interned or otherwise deprived of their liberty. DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if there are concerns about the voluntariness of involvement in DDR processes", + "Paragraph": "IHL may nevertheless apply to the wider context within which a DDR process is situated. For example, when national authorities, for whatever purpose, wish to take into custody persons enrolled in DDR processes, the UN peacekeeping operation or other UN system actor concerned should take measures to ensure that those national authorities will treat the persons concerned in accordance with their obligations under IHL, and international human rights and refugee laws, where applicable. \n\nSpecific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the conditions of DDR facilities, particularly with respect to the voluntariness of the presence and involvement of DDR participants and beneficiaries (see IDDRS 3.10 on Participants, Beneficiaries and Partners). \n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the fact that IHL may apply to the wider context within which DDR processes are situated. Safeguards should be put in place to ensure compliance with IHL and international human rights and refugee laws by the host State authorities. \n\n Red lines \nParticipation in DDR processes shall be voluntary at all times. DDR participants and beneficiaries are not detained, interned or otherwise deprived of their liberty. DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if there are concerns about the voluntariness of involvement in DDR processes", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -18235,7 +18235,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 388, - "Paragraph": "IHL may nevertheless apply to the wider context within which a DDR process is situated. For example, when national authorities, for whatever purpose, wish to take into custody persons enrolled in DDR processes, the UN peacekeeping operation or other UN system actor concerned should take measures to ensure that those national authorities will treat the persons concerned in accordance with their obligations under IHL, and international human rights and refugee laws, where applicable. \\n\\nSpecific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the conditions of DDR facilities, particularly with respect to the voluntariness of the presence and involvement of DDR participants and beneficiaries (see IDDRS 3.10 on Participants, Beneficiaries and Partners). \\n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the fact that IHL may apply to the wider context within which DDR processes are situated. Safeguards should be put in place to ensure compliance with IHL and international human rights and refugee laws by the host State authorities. \\n\\n Red lines \\nParticipation in DDR processes shall be voluntary at all times. DDR participants and beneficiaries are not detained, interned or otherwise deprived of their liberty. DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if there are concerns about the voluntariness of involvement in DDR processes", + "Paragraph": "IHL may nevertheless apply to the wider context within which a DDR process is situated. For example, when national authorities, for whatever purpose, wish to take into custody persons enrolled in DDR processes, the UN peacekeeping operation or other UN system actor concerned should take measures to ensure that those national authorities will treat the persons concerned in accordance with their obligations under IHL, and international human rights and refugee laws, where applicable. \n\nSpecific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the conditions of DDR facilities, particularly with respect to the voluntariness of the presence and involvement of DDR participants and beneficiaries (see IDDRS 3.10 on Participants, Beneficiaries and Partners). \n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the fact that IHL may apply to the wider context within which DDR processes are situated. Safeguards should be put in place to ensure compliance with IHL and international human rights and refugee laws by the host State authorities. \n\n Red lines \nParticipation in DDR processes shall be voluntary at all times. DDR participants and beneficiaries are not detained, interned or otherwise deprived of their liberty. DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if there are concerns about the voluntariness of involvement in DDR processes", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -18246,14 +18246,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.1 International humanitarian law", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\nSpecific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the conditions of DDR facilities, particularly with respect to the voluntariness of the presence and involvement of DDR participants and beneficiaries (see IDDRS 3.10 on Participants, Beneficiaries and Partners).", + "Sentence": "\n\nSpecific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the conditions of DDR facilities, particularly with respect to the voluntariness of the presence and involvement of DDR participants and beneficiaries (see IDDRS 3.10 on Participants, Beneficiaries and Partners).", "newParagraph": "ihl may nevertheless apply wider context within ddr process situated example national authority whatever purpose wish take custody person enrolled ddr process un peacekeeping operation un system actor concerned take measure ensure national authority treat person concerned accordance obligation ihl international human right refugee law applicable nnspecific guiding principle n ddr practitioner conscious condition ddr facility particularly respect voluntariness presence involvement ddr participant beneficiary see iddrs 310 participant beneficiary partner n ddr practitioner conscious fact ihl may apply wider context within ddr process situated safeguard put place ensure compliance ihl international human right refugee law host state authority nn red line nparticipation ddr process shall voluntary time ddr participant beneficiary detained interned otherwise deprived liberty ddr practitioner seek legal advice concern voluntariness involvement ddr process", "ProcessedSent": "nnspecific guiding principle n ddr practitioner conscious condition ddr facility particularly respect voluntariness presence involvement ddr participant beneficiary see iddrs 310 participant beneficiary partner", "SentID": 1013 }, { "ParagraphID": 388, - "Paragraph": "IHL may nevertheless apply to the wider context within which a DDR process is situated. For example, when national authorities, for whatever purpose, wish to take into custody persons enrolled in DDR processes, the UN peacekeeping operation or other UN system actor concerned should take measures to ensure that those national authorities will treat the persons concerned in accordance with their obligations under IHL, and international human rights and refugee laws, where applicable. \\n\\nSpecific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the conditions of DDR facilities, particularly with respect to the voluntariness of the presence and involvement of DDR participants and beneficiaries (see IDDRS 3.10 on Participants, Beneficiaries and Partners). \\n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the fact that IHL may apply to the wider context within which DDR processes are situated. Safeguards should be put in place to ensure compliance with IHL and international human rights and refugee laws by the host State authorities. \\n\\n Red lines \\nParticipation in DDR processes shall be voluntary at all times. DDR participants and beneficiaries are not detained, interned or otherwise deprived of their liberty. DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if there are concerns about the voluntariness of involvement in DDR processes", + "Paragraph": "IHL may nevertheless apply to the wider context within which a DDR process is situated. For example, when national authorities, for whatever purpose, wish to take into custody persons enrolled in DDR processes, the UN peacekeeping operation or other UN system actor concerned should take measures to ensure that those national authorities will treat the persons concerned in accordance with their obligations under IHL, and international human rights and refugee laws, where applicable. \n\nSpecific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the conditions of DDR facilities, particularly with respect to the voluntariness of the presence and involvement of DDR participants and beneficiaries (see IDDRS 3.10 on Participants, Beneficiaries and Partners). \n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the fact that IHL may apply to the wider context within which DDR processes are situated. Safeguards should be put in place to ensure compliance with IHL and international human rights and refugee laws by the host State authorities. \n\n Red lines \nParticipation in DDR processes shall be voluntary at all times. DDR participants and beneficiaries are not detained, interned or otherwise deprived of their liberty. DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if there are concerns about the voluntariness of involvement in DDR processes", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -18264,14 +18264,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.1 International humanitarian law", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the fact that IHL may apply to the wider context within which DDR processes are situated.", + "Sentence": "\n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the fact that IHL may apply to the wider context within which DDR processes are situated.", "newParagraph": "ihl may nevertheless apply wider context within ddr process situated example national authority whatever purpose wish take custody person enrolled ddr process un peacekeeping operation un system actor concerned take measure ensure national authority treat person concerned accordance obligation ihl international human right refugee law applicable nnspecific guiding principle n ddr practitioner conscious condition ddr facility particularly respect voluntariness presence involvement ddr participant beneficiary see iddrs 310 participant beneficiary partner n ddr practitioner conscious fact ihl may apply wider context within ddr process situated safeguard put place ensure compliance ihl international human right refugee law host state authority nn red line nparticipation ddr process shall voluntary time ddr participant beneficiary detained interned otherwise deprived liberty ddr practitioner seek legal advice concern voluntariness involvement ddr process", "ProcessedSent": "n ddr practitioner conscious fact ihl may apply wider context within ddr process situated", "SentID": 1014 }, { "ParagraphID": 388, - "Paragraph": "IHL may nevertheless apply to the wider context within which a DDR process is situated. For example, when national authorities, for whatever purpose, wish to take into custody persons enrolled in DDR processes, the UN peacekeeping operation or other UN system actor concerned should take measures to ensure that those national authorities will treat the persons concerned in accordance with their obligations under IHL, and international human rights and refugee laws, where applicable. \\n\\nSpecific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the conditions of DDR facilities, particularly with respect to the voluntariness of the presence and involvement of DDR participants and beneficiaries (see IDDRS 3.10 on Participants, Beneficiaries and Partners). \\n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the fact that IHL may apply to the wider context within which DDR processes are situated. Safeguards should be put in place to ensure compliance with IHL and international human rights and refugee laws by the host State authorities. \\n\\n Red lines \\nParticipation in DDR processes shall be voluntary at all times. DDR participants and beneficiaries are not detained, interned or otherwise deprived of their liberty. DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if there are concerns about the voluntariness of involvement in DDR processes", + "Paragraph": "IHL may nevertheless apply to the wider context within which a DDR process is situated. For example, when national authorities, for whatever purpose, wish to take into custody persons enrolled in DDR processes, the UN peacekeeping operation or other UN system actor concerned should take measures to ensure that those national authorities will treat the persons concerned in accordance with their obligations under IHL, and international human rights and refugee laws, where applicable. \n\nSpecific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the conditions of DDR facilities, particularly with respect to the voluntariness of the presence and involvement of DDR participants and beneficiaries (see IDDRS 3.10 on Participants, Beneficiaries and Partners). \n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the fact that IHL may apply to the wider context within which DDR processes are situated. Safeguards should be put in place to ensure compliance with IHL and international human rights and refugee laws by the host State authorities. \n\n Red lines \nParticipation in DDR processes shall be voluntary at all times. DDR participants and beneficiaries are not detained, interned or otherwise deprived of their liberty. DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if there are concerns about the voluntariness of involvement in DDR processes", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -18289,7 +18289,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 388, - "Paragraph": "IHL may nevertheless apply to the wider context within which a DDR process is situated. For example, when national authorities, for whatever purpose, wish to take into custody persons enrolled in DDR processes, the UN peacekeeping operation or other UN system actor concerned should take measures to ensure that those national authorities will treat the persons concerned in accordance with their obligations under IHL, and international human rights and refugee laws, where applicable. \\n\\nSpecific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the conditions of DDR facilities, particularly with respect to the voluntariness of the presence and involvement of DDR participants and beneficiaries (see IDDRS 3.10 on Participants, Beneficiaries and Partners). \\n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the fact that IHL may apply to the wider context within which DDR processes are situated. Safeguards should be put in place to ensure compliance with IHL and international human rights and refugee laws by the host State authorities. \\n\\n Red lines \\nParticipation in DDR processes shall be voluntary at all times. DDR participants and beneficiaries are not detained, interned or otherwise deprived of their liberty. DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if there are concerns about the voluntariness of involvement in DDR processes", + "Paragraph": "IHL may nevertheless apply to the wider context within which a DDR process is situated. For example, when national authorities, for whatever purpose, wish to take into custody persons enrolled in DDR processes, the UN peacekeeping operation or other UN system actor concerned should take measures to ensure that those national authorities will treat the persons concerned in accordance with their obligations under IHL, and international human rights and refugee laws, where applicable. \n\nSpecific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the conditions of DDR facilities, particularly with respect to the voluntariness of the presence and involvement of DDR participants and beneficiaries (see IDDRS 3.10 on Participants, Beneficiaries and Partners). \n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the fact that IHL may apply to the wider context within which DDR processes are situated. Safeguards should be put in place to ensure compliance with IHL and international human rights and refugee laws by the host State authorities. \n\n Red lines \nParticipation in DDR processes shall be voluntary at all times. DDR participants and beneficiaries are not detained, interned or otherwise deprived of their liberty. DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if there are concerns about the voluntariness of involvement in DDR processes", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -18300,14 +18300,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.1 International humanitarian law", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Red lines \\nParticipation in DDR processes shall be voluntary at all times.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Red lines \nParticipation in DDR processes shall be voluntary at all times.", "newParagraph": "ihl may nevertheless apply wider context within ddr process situated example national authority whatever purpose wish take custody person enrolled ddr process un peacekeeping operation un system actor concerned take measure ensure national authority treat person concerned accordance obligation ihl international human right refugee law applicable nnspecific guiding principle n ddr practitioner conscious condition ddr facility particularly respect voluntariness presence involvement ddr participant beneficiary see iddrs 310 participant beneficiary partner n ddr practitioner conscious fact ihl may apply wider context within ddr process situated safeguard put place ensure compliance ihl international human right refugee law host state authority nn red line nparticipation ddr process shall voluntary time ddr participant beneficiary detained interned otherwise deprived liberty ddr practitioner seek legal advice concern voluntariness involvement ddr process", "ProcessedSent": "nn red line nparticipation ddr process shall voluntary time", "SentID": 1016 }, { "ParagraphID": 388, - "Paragraph": "IHL may nevertheless apply to the wider context within which a DDR process is situated. For example, when national authorities, for whatever purpose, wish to take into custody persons enrolled in DDR processes, the UN peacekeeping operation or other UN system actor concerned should take measures to ensure that those national authorities will treat the persons concerned in accordance with their obligations under IHL, and international human rights and refugee laws, where applicable. \\n\\nSpecific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the conditions of DDR facilities, particularly with respect to the voluntariness of the presence and involvement of DDR participants and beneficiaries (see IDDRS 3.10 on Participants, Beneficiaries and Partners). \\n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the fact that IHL may apply to the wider context within which DDR processes are situated. Safeguards should be put in place to ensure compliance with IHL and international human rights and refugee laws by the host State authorities. \\n\\n Red lines \\nParticipation in DDR processes shall be voluntary at all times. DDR participants and beneficiaries are not detained, interned or otherwise deprived of their liberty. DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if there are concerns about the voluntariness of involvement in DDR processes", + "Paragraph": "IHL may nevertheless apply to the wider context within which a DDR process is situated. For example, when national authorities, for whatever purpose, wish to take into custody persons enrolled in DDR processes, the UN peacekeeping operation or other UN system actor concerned should take measures to ensure that those national authorities will treat the persons concerned in accordance with their obligations under IHL, and international human rights and refugee laws, where applicable. \n\nSpecific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the conditions of DDR facilities, particularly with respect to the voluntariness of the presence and involvement of DDR participants and beneficiaries (see IDDRS 3.10 on Participants, Beneficiaries and Partners). \n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the fact that IHL may apply to the wider context within which DDR processes are situated. Safeguards should be put in place to ensure compliance with IHL and international human rights and refugee laws by the host State authorities. \n\n Red lines \nParticipation in DDR processes shall be voluntary at all times. DDR participants and beneficiaries are not detained, interned or otherwise deprived of their liberty. DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if there are concerns about the voluntariness of involvement in DDR processes", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -18325,7 +18325,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 388, - "Paragraph": "IHL may nevertheless apply to the wider context within which a DDR process is situated. For example, when national authorities, for whatever purpose, wish to take into custody persons enrolled in DDR processes, the UN peacekeeping operation or other UN system actor concerned should take measures to ensure that those national authorities will treat the persons concerned in accordance with their obligations under IHL, and international human rights and refugee laws, where applicable. \\n\\nSpecific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the conditions of DDR facilities, particularly with respect to the voluntariness of the presence and involvement of DDR participants and beneficiaries (see IDDRS 3.10 on Participants, Beneficiaries and Partners). \\n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the fact that IHL may apply to the wider context within which DDR processes are situated. Safeguards should be put in place to ensure compliance with IHL and international human rights and refugee laws by the host State authorities. \\n\\n Red lines \\nParticipation in DDR processes shall be voluntary at all times. DDR participants and beneficiaries are not detained, interned or otherwise deprived of their liberty. DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if there are concerns about the voluntariness of involvement in DDR processes", + "Paragraph": "IHL may nevertheless apply to the wider context within which a DDR process is situated. For example, when national authorities, for whatever purpose, wish to take into custody persons enrolled in DDR processes, the UN peacekeeping operation or other UN system actor concerned should take measures to ensure that those national authorities will treat the persons concerned in accordance with their obligations under IHL, and international human rights and refugee laws, where applicable. \n\nSpecific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the conditions of DDR facilities, particularly with respect to the voluntariness of the presence and involvement of DDR participants and beneficiaries (see IDDRS 3.10 on Participants, Beneficiaries and Partners). \n DDR practitioners should be conscious of the fact that IHL may apply to the wider context within which DDR processes are situated. Safeguards should be put in place to ensure compliance with IHL and international human rights and refugee laws by the host State authorities. \n\n Red lines \nParticipation in DDR processes shall be voluntary at all times. DDR participants and beneficiaries are not detained, interned or otherwise deprived of their liberty. DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if there are concerns about the voluntariness of involvement in DDR processes", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -18397,7 +18397,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 391, - "Paragraph": "The main sources of international human rights law are: \\n The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR) was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. It set out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected. \\n The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (ICCPR) establishes a range of civil and political rights, including rights of due process and equality before the law, freedom of movement and association, freedom of religion and political opinion, and the right to liberty and security of person. \\n The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) (ICESCR) establishes the rights of individuals and duties of States to provide for the basic needs of all persons, including access to employment, education and health care. \\n The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984) (CAT) establishes that torture is prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war, internal political instability or other public emergency, and regardless of the orders of superiors or public authorities. \\n The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) (CRC) and the Optional Protocol to the CRC on Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000) recognize the special status of children and reconfirm their rights, as well as States\u2019 duty to protect children in a number of specific settings, including during armed conflict. The Optional Protocol is particularly relevant to the DDR context, as it concerns the rights of children involved in armed conflict. \\n The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) (CEDAW) defines what constitutes discrimination against women and sets up an agenda for national action to end it. CEDAW provides the basis for realizing equality between women and men through ensuring women\u2019s equal access to, and equal opportunities in, political and public life \u2013 including the right to vote and to stand for election \u2013 as well as education, health and employment. States parties agree to take all appropriate measures, including legislation and temporary special measures, so that women can enjoy all their human rights and fundamental freedoms. General recommendation No. 30 on women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations, issued by the CEDAW Committee in 2013, specifically recommends that States parties, among others, ensure (a) women\u2019s participation in all stages of DDR processes; (b) that DDR processes specifically target female combatants and women and girls associated with armed groups and that barriers to their equitable participation are addressed; (c) that mental health and psychosocial support as well as other support services are provided to them; and (d) that DDR processes specifically address women\u2019s distinct needs in order to provide age and gender-specific DDR support. \\n The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) (CRPD) clarifies and qualifies how all categories of rights apply to persons with disabilities and identifies areas where adaptations have to be made for persons with disabilities to effectively exercise their rights, and where protection of rights must be reinforced. This is also relevant for people with psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities, and is a key legislative framework addressing their human rights including the right to quality services and the right to community integration. \\n The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) (ICPPED) establishes that enforced disappearances are prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or other public emergency.", + "Paragraph": "The main sources of international human rights law are: \n The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR) was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. It set out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected. \n The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (ICCPR) establishes a range of civil and political rights, including rights of due process and equality before the law, freedom of movement and association, freedom of religion and political opinion, and the right to liberty and security of person. \n The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) (ICESCR) establishes the rights of individuals and duties of States to provide for the basic needs of all persons, including access to employment, education and health care. \n The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984) (CAT) establishes that torture is prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war, internal political instability or other public emergency, and regardless of the orders of superiors or public authorities. \n The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) (CRC) and the Optional Protocol to the CRC on Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000) recognize the special status of children and reconfirm their rights, as well as States\u2019 duty to protect children in a number of specific settings, including during armed conflict. The Optional Protocol is particularly relevant to the DDR context, as it concerns the rights of children involved in armed conflict. \n The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) (CEDAW) defines what constitutes discrimination against women and sets up an agenda for national action to end it. CEDAW provides the basis for realizing equality between women and men through ensuring women\u2019s equal access to, and equal opportunities in, political and public life \u2013 including the right to vote and to stand for election \u2013 as well as education, health and employment. States parties agree to take all appropriate measures, including legislation and temporary special measures, so that women can enjoy all their human rights and fundamental freedoms. General recommendation No. 30 on women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations, issued by the CEDAW Committee in 2013, specifically recommends that States parties, among others, ensure (a) women\u2019s participation in all stages of DDR processes; (b) that DDR processes specifically target female combatants and women and girls associated with armed groups and that barriers to their equitable participation are addressed; (c) that mental health and psychosocial support as well as other support services are provided to them; and (d) that DDR processes specifically address women\u2019s distinct needs in order to provide age and gender-specific DDR support. \n The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) (CRPD) clarifies and qualifies how all categories of rights apply to persons with disabilities and identifies areas where adaptations have to be made for persons with disabilities to effectively exercise their rights, and where protection of rights must be reinforced. This is also relevant for people with psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities, and is a key legislative framework addressing their human rights including the right to quality services and the right to community integration. \n The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) (ICPPED) establishes that enforced disappearances are prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or other public emergency.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -18408,14 +18408,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.2 International humanitarian law", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The main sources of international human rights law are: \\n The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR) was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations.", + "Sentence": "The main sources of international human rights law are: \n The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR) was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations.", "newParagraph": "main source international human right law n universal declaration human right 1948 udhr proclaimed un general assembly paris 10 december 1948 common standard achievement people nation set first time fundamental human right universally protected n international covenant civil political right 1966 iccpr establishes range civil political right including right due process equality law freedom movement association freedom religion political opinion right liberty security person n international covenant economic social cultural right 1966 icescr establishes right individual duty state provide basic need person including access employment education health care n convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 1984 cat establishes torture prohibited circumstance including time war internal political instability public emergency regardless order superior public authority n convention right child 1989 crc optional protocol crc involvement child armed conflict 2000 recognize special status child reconfirm right well state duty protect child number specific setting including armed conflict optional protocol particularly relevant ddr context concern right child involved armed conflict n convention elimination form discrimination woman 1979 cedaw defines constitutes discrimination woman set agenda national action end cedaw provides basis realizing equality woman men ensuring woman equal access equal opportunity political public life including right vote stand election well education health employment state party agree take appropriate measure including legislation temporary special measure woman enjoy human right fundamental freedom general recommendation 30 woman conflict prevention conflict postconflict situation issued cedaw committee 2013 specifically recommends state party among others ensure woman participation stage ddr process b ddr process specifically target female combatant woman girl associated armed group barrier equitable participation addressed c mental health psychosocial support well support service provided ddr process specifically address woman distinct need order provide age genderspecific ddr support n convention right person disability 2006 crpd clarifies qualifies category right apply person disability identifies area adaptation made person disability effectively exercise right protection right must reinforced also relevant people psychosocial intellectual cognitive disability key legislative framework addressing human right including right quality service right community integration n international convention protection person enforced disappearance 2006 icpped establishes enforced disappearance prohibited circumstance including time war threat war internal political instability public emergency", "ProcessedSent": "main source international human right law n universal declaration human right 1948 udhr proclaimed un general assembly paris 10 december 1948 common standard achievement people nation", "SentID": 1022 }, { "ParagraphID": 391, - "Paragraph": "The main sources of international human rights law are: \\n The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR) was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. It set out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected. \\n The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (ICCPR) establishes a range of civil and political rights, including rights of due process and equality before the law, freedom of movement and association, freedom of religion and political opinion, and the right to liberty and security of person. \\n The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) (ICESCR) establishes the rights of individuals and duties of States to provide for the basic needs of all persons, including access to employment, education and health care. \\n The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984) (CAT) establishes that torture is prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war, internal political instability or other public emergency, and regardless of the orders of superiors or public authorities. \\n The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) (CRC) and the Optional Protocol to the CRC on Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000) recognize the special status of children and reconfirm their rights, as well as States\u2019 duty to protect children in a number of specific settings, including during armed conflict. The Optional Protocol is particularly relevant to the DDR context, as it concerns the rights of children involved in armed conflict. \\n The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) (CEDAW) defines what constitutes discrimination against women and sets up an agenda for national action to end it. CEDAW provides the basis for realizing equality between women and men through ensuring women\u2019s equal access to, and equal opportunities in, political and public life \u2013 including the right to vote and to stand for election \u2013 as well as education, health and employment. States parties agree to take all appropriate measures, including legislation and temporary special measures, so that women can enjoy all their human rights and fundamental freedoms. General recommendation No. 30 on women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations, issued by the CEDAW Committee in 2013, specifically recommends that States parties, among others, ensure (a) women\u2019s participation in all stages of DDR processes; (b) that DDR processes specifically target female combatants and women and girls associated with armed groups and that barriers to their equitable participation are addressed; (c) that mental health and psychosocial support as well as other support services are provided to them; and (d) that DDR processes specifically address women\u2019s distinct needs in order to provide age and gender-specific DDR support. \\n The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) (CRPD) clarifies and qualifies how all categories of rights apply to persons with disabilities and identifies areas where adaptations have to be made for persons with disabilities to effectively exercise their rights, and where protection of rights must be reinforced. This is also relevant for people with psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities, and is a key legislative framework addressing their human rights including the right to quality services and the right to community integration. \\n The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) (ICPPED) establishes that enforced disappearances are prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or other public emergency.", + "Paragraph": "The main sources of international human rights law are: \n The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR) was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. It set out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected. \n The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (ICCPR) establishes a range of civil and political rights, including rights of due process and equality before the law, freedom of movement and association, freedom of religion and political opinion, and the right to liberty and security of person. \n The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) (ICESCR) establishes the rights of individuals and duties of States to provide for the basic needs of all persons, including access to employment, education and health care. \n The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984) (CAT) establishes that torture is prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war, internal political instability or other public emergency, and regardless of the orders of superiors or public authorities. \n The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) (CRC) and the Optional Protocol to the CRC on Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000) recognize the special status of children and reconfirm their rights, as well as States\u2019 duty to protect children in a number of specific settings, including during armed conflict. The Optional Protocol is particularly relevant to the DDR context, as it concerns the rights of children involved in armed conflict. \n The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) (CEDAW) defines what constitutes discrimination against women and sets up an agenda for national action to end it. CEDAW provides the basis for realizing equality between women and men through ensuring women\u2019s equal access to, and equal opportunities in, political and public life \u2013 including the right to vote and to stand for election \u2013 as well as education, health and employment. States parties agree to take all appropriate measures, including legislation and temporary special measures, so that women can enjoy all their human rights and fundamental freedoms. General recommendation No. 30 on women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations, issued by the CEDAW Committee in 2013, specifically recommends that States parties, among others, ensure (a) women\u2019s participation in all stages of DDR processes; (b) that DDR processes specifically target female combatants and women and girls associated with armed groups and that barriers to their equitable participation are addressed; (c) that mental health and psychosocial support as well as other support services are provided to them; and (d) that DDR processes specifically address women\u2019s distinct needs in order to provide age and gender-specific DDR support. \n The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) (CRPD) clarifies and qualifies how all categories of rights apply to persons with disabilities and identifies areas where adaptations have to be made for persons with disabilities to effectively exercise their rights, and where protection of rights must be reinforced. This is also relevant for people with psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities, and is a key legislative framework addressing their human rights including the right to quality services and the right to community integration. \n The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) (ICPPED) establishes that enforced disappearances are prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or other public emergency.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -18433,7 +18433,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 391, - "Paragraph": "The main sources of international human rights law are: \\n The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR) was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. It set out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected. \\n The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (ICCPR) establishes a range of civil and political rights, including rights of due process and equality before the law, freedom of movement and association, freedom of religion and political opinion, and the right to liberty and security of person. \\n The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) (ICESCR) establishes the rights of individuals and duties of States to provide for the basic needs of all persons, including access to employment, education and health care. \\n The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984) (CAT) establishes that torture is prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war, internal political instability or other public emergency, and regardless of the orders of superiors or public authorities. \\n The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) (CRC) and the Optional Protocol to the CRC on Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000) recognize the special status of children and reconfirm their rights, as well as States\u2019 duty to protect children in a number of specific settings, including during armed conflict. The Optional Protocol is particularly relevant to the DDR context, as it concerns the rights of children involved in armed conflict. \\n The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) (CEDAW) defines what constitutes discrimination against women and sets up an agenda for national action to end it. CEDAW provides the basis for realizing equality between women and men through ensuring women\u2019s equal access to, and equal opportunities in, political and public life \u2013 including the right to vote and to stand for election \u2013 as well as education, health and employment. States parties agree to take all appropriate measures, including legislation and temporary special measures, so that women can enjoy all their human rights and fundamental freedoms. General recommendation No. 30 on women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations, issued by the CEDAW Committee in 2013, specifically recommends that States parties, among others, ensure (a) women\u2019s participation in all stages of DDR processes; (b) that DDR processes specifically target female combatants and women and girls associated with armed groups and that barriers to their equitable participation are addressed; (c) that mental health and psychosocial support as well as other support services are provided to them; and (d) that DDR processes specifically address women\u2019s distinct needs in order to provide age and gender-specific DDR support. \\n The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) (CRPD) clarifies and qualifies how all categories of rights apply to persons with disabilities and identifies areas where adaptations have to be made for persons with disabilities to effectively exercise their rights, and where protection of rights must be reinforced. This is also relevant for people with psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities, and is a key legislative framework addressing their human rights including the right to quality services and the right to community integration. \\n The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) (ICPPED) establishes that enforced disappearances are prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or other public emergency.", + "Paragraph": "The main sources of international human rights law are: \n The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR) was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. It set out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected. \n The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (ICCPR) establishes a range of civil and political rights, including rights of due process and equality before the law, freedom of movement and association, freedom of religion and political opinion, and the right to liberty and security of person. \n The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) (ICESCR) establishes the rights of individuals and duties of States to provide for the basic needs of all persons, including access to employment, education and health care. \n The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984) (CAT) establishes that torture is prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war, internal political instability or other public emergency, and regardless of the orders of superiors or public authorities. \n The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) (CRC) and the Optional Protocol to the CRC on Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000) recognize the special status of children and reconfirm their rights, as well as States\u2019 duty to protect children in a number of specific settings, including during armed conflict. The Optional Protocol is particularly relevant to the DDR context, as it concerns the rights of children involved in armed conflict. \n The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) (CEDAW) defines what constitutes discrimination against women and sets up an agenda for national action to end it. CEDAW provides the basis for realizing equality between women and men through ensuring women\u2019s equal access to, and equal opportunities in, political and public life \u2013 including the right to vote and to stand for election \u2013 as well as education, health and employment. States parties agree to take all appropriate measures, including legislation and temporary special measures, so that women can enjoy all their human rights and fundamental freedoms. General recommendation No. 30 on women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations, issued by the CEDAW Committee in 2013, specifically recommends that States parties, among others, ensure (a) women\u2019s participation in all stages of DDR processes; (b) that DDR processes specifically target female combatants and women and girls associated with armed groups and that barriers to their equitable participation are addressed; (c) that mental health and psychosocial support as well as other support services are provided to them; and (d) that DDR processes specifically address women\u2019s distinct needs in order to provide age and gender-specific DDR support. \n The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) (CRPD) clarifies and qualifies how all categories of rights apply to persons with disabilities and identifies areas where adaptations have to be made for persons with disabilities to effectively exercise their rights, and where protection of rights must be reinforced. This is also relevant for people with psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities, and is a key legislative framework addressing their human rights including the right to quality services and the right to community integration. \n The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) (ICPPED) establishes that enforced disappearances are prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or other public emergency.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -18444,14 +18444,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.2 International humanitarian law", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (ICCPR) establishes a range of civil and political rights, including rights of due process and equality before the law, freedom of movement and association, freedom of religion and political opinion, and the right to liberty and security of person.", + "Sentence": "\n The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (ICCPR) establishes a range of civil and political rights, including rights of due process and equality before the law, freedom of movement and association, freedom of religion and political opinion, and the right to liberty and security of person.", "newParagraph": "main source international human right law n universal declaration human right 1948 udhr proclaimed un general assembly paris 10 december 1948 common standard achievement people nation set first time fundamental human right universally protected n international covenant civil political right 1966 iccpr establishes range civil political right including right due process equality law freedom movement association freedom religion political opinion right liberty security person n international covenant economic social cultural right 1966 icescr establishes right individual duty state provide basic need person including access employment education health care n convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 1984 cat establishes torture prohibited circumstance including time war internal political instability public emergency regardless order superior public authority n convention right child 1989 crc optional protocol crc involvement child armed conflict 2000 recognize special status child reconfirm right well state duty protect child number specific setting including armed conflict optional protocol particularly relevant ddr context concern right child involved armed conflict n convention elimination form discrimination woman 1979 cedaw defines constitutes discrimination woman set agenda national action end cedaw provides basis realizing equality woman men ensuring woman equal access equal opportunity political public life including right vote stand election well education health employment state party agree take appropriate measure including legislation temporary special measure woman enjoy human right fundamental freedom general recommendation 30 woman conflict prevention conflict postconflict situation issued cedaw committee 2013 specifically recommends state party among others ensure woman participation stage ddr process b ddr process specifically target female combatant woman girl associated armed group barrier equitable participation addressed c mental health psychosocial support well support service provided ddr process specifically address woman distinct need order provide age genderspecific ddr support n convention right person disability 2006 crpd clarifies qualifies category right apply person disability identifies area adaptation made person disability effectively exercise right protection right must reinforced also relevant people psychosocial intellectual cognitive disability key legislative framework addressing human right including right quality service right community integration n international convention protection person enforced disappearance 2006 icpped establishes enforced disappearance prohibited circumstance including time war threat war internal political instability public emergency", "ProcessedSent": "n international covenant civil political right 1966 iccpr establishes range civil political right including right due process equality law freedom movement association freedom religion political opinion right liberty security person", "SentID": 1024 }, { "ParagraphID": 391, - "Paragraph": "The main sources of international human rights law are: \\n The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR) was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. It set out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected. \\n The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (ICCPR) establishes a range of civil and political rights, including rights of due process and equality before the law, freedom of movement and association, freedom of religion and political opinion, and the right to liberty and security of person. \\n The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) (ICESCR) establishes the rights of individuals and duties of States to provide for the basic needs of all persons, including access to employment, education and health care. \\n The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984) (CAT) establishes that torture is prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war, internal political instability or other public emergency, and regardless of the orders of superiors or public authorities. \\n The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) (CRC) and the Optional Protocol to the CRC on Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000) recognize the special status of children and reconfirm their rights, as well as States\u2019 duty to protect children in a number of specific settings, including during armed conflict. The Optional Protocol is particularly relevant to the DDR context, as it concerns the rights of children involved in armed conflict. \\n The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) (CEDAW) defines what constitutes discrimination against women and sets up an agenda for national action to end it. CEDAW provides the basis for realizing equality between women and men through ensuring women\u2019s equal access to, and equal opportunities in, political and public life \u2013 including the right to vote and to stand for election \u2013 as well as education, health and employment. States parties agree to take all appropriate measures, including legislation and temporary special measures, so that women can enjoy all their human rights and fundamental freedoms. General recommendation No. 30 on women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations, issued by the CEDAW Committee in 2013, specifically recommends that States parties, among others, ensure (a) women\u2019s participation in all stages of DDR processes; (b) that DDR processes specifically target female combatants and women and girls associated with armed groups and that barriers to their equitable participation are addressed; (c) that mental health and psychosocial support as well as other support services are provided to them; and (d) that DDR processes specifically address women\u2019s distinct needs in order to provide age and gender-specific DDR support. \\n The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) (CRPD) clarifies and qualifies how all categories of rights apply to persons with disabilities and identifies areas where adaptations have to be made for persons with disabilities to effectively exercise their rights, and where protection of rights must be reinforced. This is also relevant for people with psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities, and is a key legislative framework addressing their human rights including the right to quality services and the right to community integration. \\n The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) (ICPPED) establishes that enforced disappearances are prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or other public emergency.", + "Paragraph": "The main sources of international human rights law are: \n The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR) was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. It set out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected. \n The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (ICCPR) establishes a range of civil and political rights, including rights of due process and equality before the law, freedom of movement and association, freedom of religion and political opinion, and the right to liberty and security of person. \n The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) (ICESCR) establishes the rights of individuals and duties of States to provide for the basic needs of all persons, including access to employment, education and health care. \n The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984) (CAT) establishes that torture is prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war, internal political instability or other public emergency, and regardless of the orders of superiors or public authorities. \n The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) (CRC) and the Optional Protocol to the CRC on Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000) recognize the special status of children and reconfirm their rights, as well as States\u2019 duty to protect children in a number of specific settings, including during armed conflict. The Optional Protocol is particularly relevant to the DDR context, as it concerns the rights of children involved in armed conflict. \n The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) (CEDAW) defines what constitutes discrimination against women and sets up an agenda for national action to end it. CEDAW provides the basis for realizing equality between women and men through ensuring women\u2019s equal access to, and equal opportunities in, political and public life \u2013 including the right to vote and to stand for election \u2013 as well as education, health and employment. States parties agree to take all appropriate measures, including legislation and temporary special measures, so that women can enjoy all their human rights and fundamental freedoms. General recommendation No. 30 on women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations, issued by the CEDAW Committee in 2013, specifically recommends that States parties, among others, ensure (a) women\u2019s participation in all stages of DDR processes; (b) that DDR processes specifically target female combatants and women and girls associated with armed groups and that barriers to their equitable participation are addressed; (c) that mental health and psychosocial support as well as other support services are provided to them; and (d) that DDR processes specifically address women\u2019s distinct needs in order to provide age and gender-specific DDR support. \n The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) (CRPD) clarifies and qualifies how all categories of rights apply to persons with disabilities and identifies areas where adaptations have to be made for persons with disabilities to effectively exercise their rights, and where protection of rights must be reinforced. This is also relevant for people with psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities, and is a key legislative framework addressing their human rights including the right to quality services and the right to community integration. \n The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) (ICPPED) establishes that enforced disappearances are prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or other public emergency.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -18462,14 +18462,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.2 International humanitarian law", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) (ICESCR) establishes the rights of individuals and duties of States to provide for the basic needs of all persons, including access to employment, education and health care.", + "Sentence": "\n The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) (ICESCR) establishes the rights of individuals and duties of States to provide for the basic needs of all persons, including access to employment, education and health care.", "newParagraph": "main source international human right law n universal declaration human right 1948 udhr proclaimed un general assembly paris 10 december 1948 common standard achievement people nation set first time fundamental human right universally protected n international covenant civil political right 1966 iccpr establishes range civil political right including right due process equality law freedom movement association freedom religion political opinion right liberty security person n international covenant economic social cultural right 1966 icescr establishes right individual duty state provide basic need person including access employment education health care n convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 1984 cat establishes torture prohibited circumstance including time war internal political instability public emergency regardless order superior public authority n convention right child 1989 crc optional protocol crc involvement child armed conflict 2000 recognize special status child reconfirm right well state duty protect child number specific setting including armed conflict optional protocol particularly relevant ddr context concern right child involved armed conflict n convention elimination form discrimination woman 1979 cedaw defines constitutes discrimination woman set agenda national action end cedaw provides basis realizing equality woman men ensuring woman equal access equal opportunity political public life including right vote stand election well education health employment state party agree take appropriate measure including legislation temporary special measure woman enjoy human right fundamental freedom general recommendation 30 woman conflict prevention conflict postconflict situation issued cedaw committee 2013 specifically recommends state party among others ensure woman participation stage ddr process b ddr process specifically target female combatant woman girl associated armed group barrier equitable participation addressed c mental health psychosocial support well support service provided ddr process specifically address woman distinct need order provide age genderspecific ddr support n convention right person disability 2006 crpd clarifies qualifies category right apply person disability identifies area adaptation made person disability effectively exercise right protection right must reinforced also relevant people psychosocial intellectual cognitive disability key legislative framework addressing human right including right quality service right community integration n international convention protection person enforced disappearance 2006 icpped establishes enforced disappearance prohibited circumstance including time war threat war internal political instability public emergency", "ProcessedSent": "n international covenant economic social cultural right 1966 icescr establishes right individual duty state provide basic need person including access employment education health care", "SentID": 1025 }, { "ParagraphID": 391, - "Paragraph": "The main sources of international human rights law are: \\n The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR) was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. It set out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected. \\n The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (ICCPR) establishes a range of civil and political rights, including rights of due process and equality before the law, freedom of movement and association, freedom of religion and political opinion, and the right to liberty and security of person. \\n The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) (ICESCR) establishes the rights of individuals and duties of States to provide for the basic needs of all persons, including access to employment, education and health care. \\n The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984) (CAT) establishes that torture is prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war, internal political instability or other public emergency, and regardless of the orders of superiors or public authorities. \\n The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) (CRC) and the Optional Protocol to the CRC on Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000) recognize the special status of children and reconfirm their rights, as well as States\u2019 duty to protect children in a number of specific settings, including during armed conflict. The Optional Protocol is particularly relevant to the DDR context, as it concerns the rights of children involved in armed conflict. \\n The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) (CEDAW) defines what constitutes discrimination against women and sets up an agenda for national action to end it. CEDAW provides the basis for realizing equality between women and men through ensuring women\u2019s equal access to, and equal opportunities in, political and public life \u2013 including the right to vote and to stand for election \u2013 as well as education, health and employment. States parties agree to take all appropriate measures, including legislation and temporary special measures, so that women can enjoy all their human rights and fundamental freedoms. General recommendation No. 30 on women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations, issued by the CEDAW Committee in 2013, specifically recommends that States parties, among others, ensure (a) women\u2019s participation in all stages of DDR processes; (b) that DDR processes specifically target female combatants and women and girls associated with armed groups and that barriers to their equitable participation are addressed; (c) that mental health and psychosocial support as well as other support services are provided to them; and (d) that DDR processes specifically address women\u2019s distinct needs in order to provide age and gender-specific DDR support. \\n The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) (CRPD) clarifies and qualifies how all categories of rights apply to persons with disabilities and identifies areas where adaptations have to be made for persons with disabilities to effectively exercise their rights, and where protection of rights must be reinforced. This is also relevant for people with psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities, and is a key legislative framework addressing their human rights including the right to quality services and the right to community integration. \\n The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) (ICPPED) establishes that enforced disappearances are prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or other public emergency.", + "Paragraph": "The main sources of international human rights law are: \n The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR) was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. It set out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected. \n The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (ICCPR) establishes a range of civil and political rights, including rights of due process and equality before the law, freedom of movement and association, freedom of religion and political opinion, and the right to liberty and security of person. \n The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) (ICESCR) establishes the rights of individuals and duties of States to provide for the basic needs of all persons, including access to employment, education and health care. \n The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984) (CAT) establishes that torture is prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war, internal political instability or other public emergency, and regardless of the orders of superiors or public authorities. \n The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) (CRC) and the Optional Protocol to the CRC on Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000) recognize the special status of children and reconfirm their rights, as well as States\u2019 duty to protect children in a number of specific settings, including during armed conflict. The Optional Protocol is particularly relevant to the DDR context, as it concerns the rights of children involved in armed conflict. \n The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) (CEDAW) defines what constitutes discrimination against women and sets up an agenda for national action to end it. CEDAW provides the basis for realizing equality between women and men through ensuring women\u2019s equal access to, and equal opportunities in, political and public life \u2013 including the right to vote and to stand for election \u2013 as well as education, health and employment. States parties agree to take all appropriate measures, including legislation and temporary special measures, so that women can enjoy all their human rights and fundamental freedoms. General recommendation No. 30 on women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations, issued by the CEDAW Committee in 2013, specifically recommends that States parties, among others, ensure (a) women\u2019s participation in all stages of DDR processes; (b) that DDR processes specifically target female combatants and women and girls associated with armed groups and that barriers to their equitable participation are addressed; (c) that mental health and psychosocial support as well as other support services are provided to them; and (d) that DDR processes specifically address women\u2019s distinct needs in order to provide age and gender-specific DDR support. \n The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) (CRPD) clarifies and qualifies how all categories of rights apply to persons with disabilities and identifies areas where adaptations have to be made for persons with disabilities to effectively exercise their rights, and where protection of rights must be reinforced. This is also relevant for people with psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities, and is a key legislative framework addressing their human rights including the right to quality services and the right to community integration. \n The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) (ICPPED) establishes that enforced disappearances are prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or other public emergency.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -18480,14 +18480,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.2 International humanitarian law", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984) (CAT) establishes that torture is prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war, internal political instability or other public emergency, and regardless of the orders of superiors or public authorities.", + "Sentence": "\n The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984) (CAT) establishes that torture is prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war, internal political instability or other public emergency, and regardless of the orders of superiors or public authorities.", "newParagraph": "main source international human right law n universal declaration human right 1948 udhr proclaimed un general assembly paris 10 december 1948 common standard achievement people nation set first time fundamental human right universally protected n international covenant civil political right 1966 iccpr establishes range civil political right including right due process equality law freedom movement association freedom religion political opinion right liberty security person n international covenant economic social cultural right 1966 icescr establishes right individual duty state provide basic need person including access employment education health care n convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 1984 cat establishes torture prohibited circumstance including time war internal political instability public emergency regardless order superior public authority n convention right child 1989 crc optional protocol crc involvement child armed conflict 2000 recognize special status child reconfirm right well state duty protect child number specific setting including armed conflict optional protocol particularly relevant ddr context concern right child involved armed conflict n convention elimination form discrimination woman 1979 cedaw defines constitutes discrimination woman set agenda national action end cedaw provides basis realizing equality woman men ensuring woman equal access equal opportunity political public life including right vote stand election well education health employment state party agree take appropriate measure including legislation temporary special measure woman enjoy human right fundamental freedom general recommendation 30 woman conflict prevention conflict postconflict situation issued cedaw committee 2013 specifically recommends state party among others ensure woman participation stage ddr process b ddr process specifically target female combatant woman girl associated armed group barrier equitable participation addressed c mental health psychosocial support well support service provided ddr process specifically address woman distinct need order provide age genderspecific ddr support n convention right person disability 2006 crpd clarifies qualifies category right apply person disability identifies area adaptation made person disability effectively exercise right protection right must reinforced also relevant people psychosocial intellectual cognitive disability key legislative framework addressing human right including right quality service right community integration n international convention protection person enforced disappearance 2006 icpped establishes enforced disappearance prohibited circumstance including time war threat war internal political instability public emergency", "ProcessedSent": "n convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 1984 cat establishes torture prohibited circumstance including time war internal political instability public emergency regardless order superior public authority", "SentID": 1026 }, { "ParagraphID": 391, - "Paragraph": "The main sources of international human rights law are: \\n The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR) was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. It set out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected. \\n The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (ICCPR) establishes a range of civil and political rights, including rights of due process and equality before the law, freedom of movement and association, freedom of religion and political opinion, and the right to liberty and security of person. \\n The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) (ICESCR) establishes the rights of individuals and duties of States to provide for the basic needs of all persons, including access to employment, education and health care. \\n The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984) (CAT) establishes that torture is prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war, internal political instability or other public emergency, and regardless of the orders of superiors or public authorities. \\n The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) (CRC) and the Optional Protocol to the CRC on Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000) recognize the special status of children and reconfirm their rights, as well as States\u2019 duty to protect children in a number of specific settings, including during armed conflict. The Optional Protocol is particularly relevant to the DDR context, as it concerns the rights of children involved in armed conflict. \\n The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) (CEDAW) defines what constitutes discrimination against women and sets up an agenda for national action to end it. CEDAW provides the basis for realizing equality between women and men through ensuring women\u2019s equal access to, and equal opportunities in, political and public life \u2013 including the right to vote and to stand for election \u2013 as well as education, health and employment. States parties agree to take all appropriate measures, including legislation and temporary special measures, so that women can enjoy all their human rights and fundamental freedoms. General recommendation No. 30 on women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations, issued by the CEDAW Committee in 2013, specifically recommends that States parties, among others, ensure (a) women\u2019s participation in all stages of DDR processes; (b) that DDR processes specifically target female combatants and women and girls associated with armed groups and that barriers to their equitable participation are addressed; (c) that mental health and psychosocial support as well as other support services are provided to them; and (d) that DDR processes specifically address women\u2019s distinct needs in order to provide age and gender-specific DDR support. \\n The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) (CRPD) clarifies and qualifies how all categories of rights apply to persons with disabilities and identifies areas where adaptations have to be made for persons with disabilities to effectively exercise their rights, and where protection of rights must be reinforced. This is also relevant for people with psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities, and is a key legislative framework addressing their human rights including the right to quality services and the right to community integration. \\n The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) (ICPPED) establishes that enforced disappearances are prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or other public emergency.", + "Paragraph": "The main sources of international human rights law are: \n The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR) was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. It set out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected. \n The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (ICCPR) establishes a range of civil and political rights, including rights of due process and equality before the law, freedom of movement and association, freedom of religion and political opinion, and the right to liberty and security of person. \n The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) (ICESCR) establishes the rights of individuals and duties of States to provide for the basic needs of all persons, including access to employment, education and health care. \n The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984) (CAT) establishes that torture is prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war, internal political instability or other public emergency, and regardless of the orders of superiors or public authorities. \n The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) (CRC) and the Optional Protocol to the CRC on Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000) recognize the special status of children and reconfirm their rights, as well as States\u2019 duty to protect children in a number of specific settings, including during armed conflict. The Optional Protocol is particularly relevant to the DDR context, as it concerns the rights of children involved in armed conflict. \n The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) (CEDAW) defines what constitutes discrimination against women and sets up an agenda for national action to end it. CEDAW provides the basis for realizing equality between women and men through ensuring women\u2019s equal access to, and equal opportunities in, political and public life \u2013 including the right to vote and to stand for election \u2013 as well as education, health and employment. States parties agree to take all appropriate measures, including legislation and temporary special measures, so that women can enjoy all their human rights and fundamental freedoms. General recommendation No. 30 on women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations, issued by the CEDAW Committee in 2013, specifically recommends that States parties, among others, ensure (a) women\u2019s participation in all stages of DDR processes; (b) that DDR processes specifically target female combatants and women and girls associated with armed groups and that barriers to their equitable participation are addressed; (c) that mental health and psychosocial support as well as other support services are provided to them; and (d) that DDR processes specifically address women\u2019s distinct needs in order to provide age and gender-specific DDR support. \n The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) (CRPD) clarifies and qualifies how all categories of rights apply to persons with disabilities and identifies areas where adaptations have to be made for persons with disabilities to effectively exercise their rights, and where protection of rights must be reinforced. This is also relevant for people with psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities, and is a key legislative framework addressing their human rights including the right to quality services and the right to community integration. \n The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) (ICPPED) establishes that enforced disappearances are prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or other public emergency.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -18498,14 +18498,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.2 International humanitarian law", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) (CRC) and the Optional Protocol to the CRC on Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000) recognize the special status of children and reconfirm their rights, as well as States\u2019 duty to protect children in a number of specific settings, including during armed conflict.", + "Sentence": "\n The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) (CRC) and the Optional Protocol to the CRC on Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000) recognize the special status of children and reconfirm their rights, as well as States\u2019 duty to protect children in a number of specific settings, including during armed conflict.", "newParagraph": "main source international human right law n universal declaration human right 1948 udhr proclaimed un general assembly paris 10 december 1948 common standard achievement people nation set first time fundamental human right universally protected n international covenant civil political right 1966 iccpr establishes range civil political right including right due process equality law freedom movement association freedom religion political opinion right liberty security person n international covenant economic social cultural right 1966 icescr establishes right individual duty state provide basic need person including access employment education health care n convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 1984 cat establishes torture prohibited circumstance including time war internal political instability public emergency regardless order superior public authority n convention right child 1989 crc optional protocol crc involvement child armed conflict 2000 recognize special status child reconfirm right well state duty protect child number specific setting including armed conflict optional protocol particularly relevant ddr context concern right child involved armed conflict n convention elimination form discrimination woman 1979 cedaw defines constitutes discrimination woman set agenda national action end cedaw provides basis realizing equality woman men ensuring woman equal access equal opportunity political public life including right vote stand election well education health employment state party agree take appropriate measure including legislation temporary special measure woman enjoy human right fundamental freedom general recommendation 30 woman conflict prevention conflict postconflict situation issued cedaw committee 2013 specifically recommends state party among others ensure woman participation stage ddr process b ddr process specifically target female combatant woman girl associated armed group barrier equitable participation addressed c mental health psychosocial support well support service provided ddr process specifically address woman distinct need order provide age genderspecific ddr support n convention right person disability 2006 crpd clarifies qualifies category right apply person disability identifies area adaptation made person disability effectively exercise right protection right must reinforced also relevant people psychosocial intellectual cognitive disability key legislative framework addressing human right including right quality service right community integration n international convention protection person enforced disappearance 2006 icpped establishes enforced disappearance prohibited circumstance including time war threat war internal political instability public emergency", "ProcessedSent": "n convention right child 1989 crc optional protocol crc involvement child armed conflict 2000 recognize special status child reconfirm right well state duty protect child number specific setting including armed conflict", "SentID": 1027 }, { "ParagraphID": 391, - "Paragraph": "The main sources of international human rights law are: \\n The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR) was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. It set out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected. \\n The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (ICCPR) establishes a range of civil and political rights, including rights of due process and equality before the law, freedom of movement and association, freedom of religion and political opinion, and the right to liberty and security of person. \\n The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) (ICESCR) establishes the rights of individuals and duties of States to provide for the basic needs of all persons, including access to employment, education and health care. \\n The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984) (CAT) establishes that torture is prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war, internal political instability or other public emergency, and regardless of the orders of superiors or public authorities. \\n The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) (CRC) and the Optional Protocol to the CRC on Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000) recognize the special status of children and reconfirm their rights, as well as States\u2019 duty to protect children in a number of specific settings, including during armed conflict. The Optional Protocol is particularly relevant to the DDR context, as it concerns the rights of children involved in armed conflict. \\n The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) (CEDAW) defines what constitutes discrimination against women and sets up an agenda for national action to end it. CEDAW provides the basis for realizing equality between women and men through ensuring women\u2019s equal access to, and equal opportunities in, political and public life \u2013 including the right to vote and to stand for election \u2013 as well as education, health and employment. States parties agree to take all appropriate measures, including legislation and temporary special measures, so that women can enjoy all their human rights and fundamental freedoms. General recommendation No. 30 on women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations, issued by the CEDAW Committee in 2013, specifically recommends that States parties, among others, ensure (a) women\u2019s participation in all stages of DDR processes; (b) that DDR processes specifically target female combatants and women and girls associated with armed groups and that barriers to their equitable participation are addressed; (c) that mental health and psychosocial support as well as other support services are provided to them; and (d) that DDR processes specifically address women\u2019s distinct needs in order to provide age and gender-specific DDR support. \\n The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) (CRPD) clarifies and qualifies how all categories of rights apply to persons with disabilities and identifies areas where adaptations have to be made for persons with disabilities to effectively exercise their rights, and where protection of rights must be reinforced. This is also relevant for people with psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities, and is a key legislative framework addressing their human rights including the right to quality services and the right to community integration. \\n The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) (ICPPED) establishes that enforced disappearances are prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or other public emergency.", + "Paragraph": "The main sources of international human rights law are: \n The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR) was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. It set out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected. \n The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (ICCPR) establishes a range of civil and political rights, including rights of due process and equality before the law, freedom of movement and association, freedom of religion and political opinion, and the right to liberty and security of person. \n The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) (ICESCR) establishes the rights of individuals and duties of States to provide for the basic needs of all persons, including access to employment, education and health care. \n The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984) (CAT) establishes that torture is prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war, internal political instability or other public emergency, and regardless of the orders of superiors or public authorities. \n The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) (CRC) and the Optional Protocol to the CRC on Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000) recognize the special status of children and reconfirm their rights, as well as States\u2019 duty to protect children in a number of specific settings, including during armed conflict. The Optional Protocol is particularly relevant to the DDR context, as it concerns the rights of children involved in armed conflict. \n The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) (CEDAW) defines what constitutes discrimination against women and sets up an agenda for national action to end it. CEDAW provides the basis for realizing equality between women and men through ensuring women\u2019s equal access to, and equal opportunities in, political and public life \u2013 including the right to vote and to stand for election \u2013 as well as education, health and employment. States parties agree to take all appropriate measures, including legislation and temporary special measures, so that women can enjoy all their human rights and fundamental freedoms. General recommendation No. 30 on women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations, issued by the CEDAW Committee in 2013, specifically recommends that States parties, among others, ensure (a) women\u2019s participation in all stages of DDR processes; (b) that DDR processes specifically target female combatants and women and girls associated with armed groups and that barriers to their equitable participation are addressed; (c) that mental health and psychosocial support as well as other support services are provided to them; and (d) that DDR processes specifically address women\u2019s distinct needs in order to provide age and gender-specific DDR support. \n The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) (CRPD) clarifies and qualifies how all categories of rights apply to persons with disabilities and identifies areas where adaptations have to be made for persons with disabilities to effectively exercise their rights, and where protection of rights must be reinforced. This is also relevant for people with psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities, and is a key legislative framework addressing their human rights including the right to quality services and the right to community integration. \n The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) (ICPPED) establishes that enforced disappearances are prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or other public emergency.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -18523,7 +18523,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 391, - "Paragraph": "The main sources of international human rights law are: \\n The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR) was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. It set out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected. \\n The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (ICCPR) establishes a range of civil and political rights, including rights of due process and equality before the law, freedom of movement and association, freedom of religion and political opinion, and the right to liberty and security of person. \\n The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) (ICESCR) establishes the rights of individuals and duties of States to provide for the basic needs of all persons, including access to employment, education and health care. \\n The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984) (CAT) establishes that torture is prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war, internal political instability or other public emergency, and regardless of the orders of superiors or public authorities. \\n The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) (CRC) and the Optional Protocol to the CRC on Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000) recognize the special status of children and reconfirm their rights, as well as States\u2019 duty to protect children in a number of specific settings, including during armed conflict. The Optional Protocol is particularly relevant to the DDR context, as it concerns the rights of children involved in armed conflict. \\n The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) (CEDAW) defines what constitutes discrimination against women and sets up an agenda for national action to end it. CEDAW provides the basis for realizing equality between women and men through ensuring women\u2019s equal access to, and equal opportunities in, political and public life \u2013 including the right to vote and to stand for election \u2013 as well as education, health and employment. States parties agree to take all appropriate measures, including legislation and temporary special measures, so that women can enjoy all their human rights and fundamental freedoms. General recommendation No. 30 on women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations, issued by the CEDAW Committee in 2013, specifically recommends that States parties, among others, ensure (a) women\u2019s participation in all stages of DDR processes; (b) that DDR processes specifically target female combatants and women and girls associated with armed groups and that barriers to their equitable participation are addressed; (c) that mental health and psychosocial support as well as other support services are provided to them; and (d) that DDR processes specifically address women\u2019s distinct needs in order to provide age and gender-specific DDR support. \\n The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) (CRPD) clarifies and qualifies how all categories of rights apply to persons with disabilities and identifies areas where adaptations have to be made for persons with disabilities to effectively exercise their rights, and where protection of rights must be reinforced. This is also relevant for people with psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities, and is a key legislative framework addressing their human rights including the right to quality services and the right to community integration. \\n The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) (ICPPED) establishes that enforced disappearances are prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or other public emergency.", + "Paragraph": "The main sources of international human rights law are: \n The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR) was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. It set out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected. \n The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (ICCPR) establishes a range of civil and political rights, including rights of due process and equality before the law, freedom of movement and association, freedom of religion and political opinion, and the right to liberty and security of person. \n The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) (ICESCR) establishes the rights of individuals and duties of States to provide for the basic needs of all persons, including access to employment, education and health care. \n The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984) (CAT) establishes that torture is prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war, internal political instability or other public emergency, and regardless of the orders of superiors or public authorities. \n The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) (CRC) and the Optional Protocol to the CRC on Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000) recognize the special status of children and reconfirm their rights, as well as States\u2019 duty to protect children in a number of specific settings, including during armed conflict. The Optional Protocol is particularly relevant to the DDR context, as it concerns the rights of children involved in armed conflict. \n The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) (CEDAW) defines what constitutes discrimination against women and sets up an agenda for national action to end it. CEDAW provides the basis for realizing equality between women and men through ensuring women\u2019s equal access to, and equal opportunities in, political and public life \u2013 including the right to vote and to stand for election \u2013 as well as education, health and employment. States parties agree to take all appropriate measures, including legislation and temporary special measures, so that women can enjoy all their human rights and fundamental freedoms. General recommendation No. 30 on women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations, issued by the CEDAW Committee in 2013, specifically recommends that States parties, among others, ensure (a) women\u2019s participation in all stages of DDR processes; (b) that DDR processes specifically target female combatants and women and girls associated with armed groups and that barriers to their equitable participation are addressed; (c) that mental health and psychosocial support as well as other support services are provided to them; and (d) that DDR processes specifically address women\u2019s distinct needs in order to provide age and gender-specific DDR support. \n The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) (CRPD) clarifies and qualifies how all categories of rights apply to persons with disabilities and identifies areas where adaptations have to be made for persons with disabilities to effectively exercise their rights, and where protection of rights must be reinforced. This is also relevant for people with psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities, and is a key legislative framework addressing their human rights including the right to quality services and the right to community integration. \n The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) (ICPPED) establishes that enforced disappearances are prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or other public emergency.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -18534,14 +18534,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.2 International humanitarian law", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) (CEDAW) defines what constitutes discrimination against women and sets up an agenda for national action to end it.", + "Sentence": "\n The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) (CEDAW) defines what constitutes discrimination against women and sets up an agenda for national action to end it.", "newParagraph": "main source international human right law n universal declaration human right 1948 udhr proclaimed un general assembly paris 10 december 1948 common standard achievement people nation set first time fundamental human right universally protected n international covenant civil political right 1966 iccpr establishes range civil political right including right due process equality law freedom movement association freedom religion political opinion right liberty security person n international covenant economic social cultural right 1966 icescr establishes right individual duty state provide basic need person including access employment education health care n convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 1984 cat establishes torture prohibited circumstance including time war internal political instability public emergency regardless order superior public authority n convention right child 1989 crc optional protocol crc involvement child armed conflict 2000 recognize special status child reconfirm right well state duty protect child number specific setting including armed conflict optional protocol particularly relevant ddr context concern right child involved armed conflict n convention elimination form discrimination woman 1979 cedaw defines constitutes discrimination woman set agenda national action end cedaw provides basis realizing equality woman men ensuring woman equal access equal opportunity political public life including right vote stand election well education health employment state party agree take appropriate measure including legislation temporary special measure woman enjoy human right fundamental freedom general recommendation 30 woman conflict prevention conflict postconflict situation issued cedaw committee 2013 specifically recommends state party among others ensure woman participation stage ddr process b ddr process specifically target female combatant woman girl associated armed group barrier equitable participation addressed c mental health psychosocial support well support service provided ddr process specifically address woman distinct need order provide age genderspecific ddr support n convention right person disability 2006 crpd clarifies qualifies category right apply person disability identifies area adaptation made person disability effectively exercise right protection right must reinforced also relevant people psychosocial intellectual cognitive disability key legislative framework addressing human right including right quality service right community integration n international convention protection person enforced disappearance 2006 icpped establishes enforced disappearance prohibited circumstance including time war threat war internal political instability public emergency", "ProcessedSent": "n convention elimination form discrimination woman 1979 cedaw defines constitutes discrimination woman set agenda national action end", "SentID": 1029 }, { "ParagraphID": 391, - "Paragraph": "The main sources of international human rights law are: \\n The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR) was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. It set out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected. \\n The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (ICCPR) establishes a range of civil and political rights, including rights of due process and equality before the law, freedom of movement and association, freedom of religion and political opinion, and the right to liberty and security of person. \\n The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) (ICESCR) establishes the rights of individuals and duties of States to provide for the basic needs of all persons, including access to employment, education and health care. \\n The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984) (CAT) establishes that torture is prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war, internal political instability or other public emergency, and regardless of the orders of superiors or public authorities. \\n The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) (CRC) and the Optional Protocol to the CRC on Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000) recognize the special status of children and reconfirm their rights, as well as States\u2019 duty to protect children in a number of specific settings, including during armed conflict. The Optional Protocol is particularly relevant to the DDR context, as it concerns the rights of children involved in armed conflict. \\n The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) (CEDAW) defines what constitutes discrimination against women and sets up an agenda for national action to end it. CEDAW provides the basis for realizing equality between women and men through ensuring women\u2019s equal access to, and equal opportunities in, political and public life \u2013 including the right to vote and to stand for election \u2013 as well as education, health and employment. States parties agree to take all appropriate measures, including legislation and temporary special measures, so that women can enjoy all their human rights and fundamental freedoms. General recommendation No. 30 on women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations, issued by the CEDAW Committee in 2013, specifically recommends that States parties, among others, ensure (a) women\u2019s participation in all stages of DDR processes; (b) that DDR processes specifically target female combatants and women and girls associated with armed groups and that barriers to their equitable participation are addressed; (c) that mental health and psychosocial support as well as other support services are provided to them; and (d) that DDR processes specifically address women\u2019s distinct needs in order to provide age and gender-specific DDR support. \\n The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) (CRPD) clarifies and qualifies how all categories of rights apply to persons with disabilities and identifies areas where adaptations have to be made for persons with disabilities to effectively exercise their rights, and where protection of rights must be reinforced. This is also relevant for people with psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities, and is a key legislative framework addressing their human rights including the right to quality services and the right to community integration. \\n The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) (ICPPED) establishes that enforced disappearances are prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or other public emergency.", + "Paragraph": "The main sources of international human rights law are: \n The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR) was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. It set out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected. \n The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (ICCPR) establishes a range of civil and political rights, including rights of due process and equality before the law, freedom of movement and association, freedom of religion and political opinion, and the right to liberty and security of person. \n The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) (ICESCR) establishes the rights of individuals and duties of States to provide for the basic needs of all persons, including access to employment, education and health care. \n The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984) (CAT) establishes that torture is prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war, internal political instability or other public emergency, and regardless of the orders of superiors or public authorities. \n The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) (CRC) and the Optional Protocol to the CRC on Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000) recognize the special status of children and reconfirm their rights, as well as States\u2019 duty to protect children in a number of specific settings, including during armed conflict. The Optional Protocol is particularly relevant to the DDR context, as it concerns the rights of children involved in armed conflict. \n The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) (CEDAW) defines what constitutes discrimination against women and sets up an agenda for national action to end it. CEDAW provides the basis for realizing equality between women and men through ensuring women\u2019s equal access to, and equal opportunities in, political and public life \u2013 including the right to vote and to stand for election \u2013 as well as education, health and employment. States parties agree to take all appropriate measures, including legislation and temporary special measures, so that women can enjoy all their human rights and fundamental freedoms. General recommendation No. 30 on women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations, issued by the CEDAW Committee in 2013, specifically recommends that States parties, among others, ensure (a) women\u2019s participation in all stages of DDR processes; (b) that DDR processes specifically target female combatants and women and girls associated with armed groups and that barriers to their equitable participation are addressed; (c) that mental health and psychosocial support as well as other support services are provided to them; and (d) that DDR processes specifically address women\u2019s distinct needs in order to provide age and gender-specific DDR support. \n The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) (CRPD) clarifies and qualifies how all categories of rights apply to persons with disabilities and identifies areas where adaptations have to be made for persons with disabilities to effectively exercise their rights, and where protection of rights must be reinforced. This is also relevant for people with psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities, and is a key legislative framework addressing their human rights including the right to quality services and the right to community integration. \n The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) (ICPPED) establishes that enforced disappearances are prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or other public emergency.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -18559,7 +18559,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 391, - "Paragraph": "The main sources of international human rights law are: \\n The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR) was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. It set out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected. \\n The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (ICCPR) establishes a range of civil and political rights, including rights of due process and equality before the law, freedom of movement and association, freedom of religion and political opinion, and the right to liberty and security of person. \\n The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) (ICESCR) establishes the rights of individuals and duties of States to provide for the basic needs of all persons, including access to employment, education and health care. \\n The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984) (CAT) establishes that torture is prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war, internal political instability or other public emergency, and regardless of the orders of superiors or public authorities. \\n The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) (CRC) and the Optional Protocol to the CRC on Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000) recognize the special status of children and reconfirm their rights, as well as States\u2019 duty to protect children in a number of specific settings, including during armed conflict. The Optional Protocol is particularly relevant to the DDR context, as it concerns the rights of children involved in armed conflict. \\n The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) (CEDAW) defines what constitutes discrimination against women and sets up an agenda for national action to end it. CEDAW provides the basis for realizing equality between women and men through ensuring women\u2019s equal access to, and equal opportunities in, political and public life \u2013 including the right to vote and to stand for election \u2013 as well as education, health and employment. States parties agree to take all appropriate measures, including legislation and temporary special measures, so that women can enjoy all their human rights and fundamental freedoms. General recommendation No. 30 on women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations, issued by the CEDAW Committee in 2013, specifically recommends that States parties, among others, ensure (a) women\u2019s participation in all stages of DDR processes; (b) that DDR processes specifically target female combatants and women and girls associated with armed groups and that barriers to their equitable participation are addressed; (c) that mental health and psychosocial support as well as other support services are provided to them; and (d) that DDR processes specifically address women\u2019s distinct needs in order to provide age and gender-specific DDR support. \\n The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) (CRPD) clarifies and qualifies how all categories of rights apply to persons with disabilities and identifies areas where adaptations have to be made for persons with disabilities to effectively exercise their rights, and where protection of rights must be reinforced. This is also relevant for people with psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities, and is a key legislative framework addressing their human rights including the right to quality services and the right to community integration. \\n The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) (ICPPED) establishes that enforced disappearances are prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or other public emergency.", + "Paragraph": "The main sources of international human rights law are: \n The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR) was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. It set out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected. \n The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (ICCPR) establishes a range of civil and political rights, including rights of due process and equality before the law, freedom of movement and association, freedom of religion and political opinion, and the right to liberty and security of person. \n The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) (ICESCR) establishes the rights of individuals and duties of States to provide for the basic needs of all persons, including access to employment, education and health care. \n The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984) (CAT) establishes that torture is prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war, internal political instability or other public emergency, and regardless of the orders of superiors or public authorities. \n The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) (CRC) and the Optional Protocol to the CRC on Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000) recognize the special status of children and reconfirm their rights, as well as States\u2019 duty to protect children in a number of specific settings, including during armed conflict. The Optional Protocol is particularly relevant to the DDR context, as it concerns the rights of children involved in armed conflict. \n The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) (CEDAW) defines what constitutes discrimination against women and sets up an agenda for national action to end it. CEDAW provides the basis for realizing equality between women and men through ensuring women\u2019s equal access to, and equal opportunities in, political and public life \u2013 including the right to vote and to stand for election \u2013 as well as education, health and employment. States parties agree to take all appropriate measures, including legislation and temporary special measures, so that women can enjoy all their human rights and fundamental freedoms. General recommendation No. 30 on women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations, issued by the CEDAW Committee in 2013, specifically recommends that States parties, among others, ensure (a) women\u2019s participation in all stages of DDR processes; (b) that DDR processes specifically target female combatants and women and girls associated with armed groups and that barriers to their equitable participation are addressed; (c) that mental health and psychosocial support as well as other support services are provided to them; and (d) that DDR processes specifically address women\u2019s distinct needs in order to provide age and gender-specific DDR support. \n The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) (CRPD) clarifies and qualifies how all categories of rights apply to persons with disabilities and identifies areas where adaptations have to be made for persons with disabilities to effectively exercise their rights, and where protection of rights must be reinforced. This is also relevant for people with psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities, and is a key legislative framework addressing their human rights including the right to quality services and the right to community integration. \n The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) (ICPPED) establishes that enforced disappearances are prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or other public emergency.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -18577,7 +18577,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 391, - "Paragraph": "The main sources of international human rights law are: \\n The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR) was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. It set out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected. \\n The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (ICCPR) establishes a range of civil and political rights, including rights of due process and equality before the law, freedom of movement and association, freedom of religion and political opinion, and the right to liberty and security of person. \\n The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) (ICESCR) establishes the rights of individuals and duties of States to provide for the basic needs of all persons, including access to employment, education and health care. \\n The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984) (CAT) establishes that torture is prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war, internal political instability or other public emergency, and regardless of the orders of superiors or public authorities. \\n The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) (CRC) and the Optional Protocol to the CRC on Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000) recognize the special status of children and reconfirm their rights, as well as States\u2019 duty to protect children in a number of specific settings, including during armed conflict. The Optional Protocol is particularly relevant to the DDR context, as it concerns the rights of children involved in armed conflict. \\n The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) (CEDAW) defines what constitutes discrimination against women and sets up an agenda for national action to end it. CEDAW provides the basis for realizing equality between women and men through ensuring women\u2019s equal access to, and equal opportunities in, political and public life \u2013 including the right to vote and to stand for election \u2013 as well as education, health and employment. States parties agree to take all appropriate measures, including legislation and temporary special measures, so that women can enjoy all their human rights and fundamental freedoms. General recommendation No. 30 on women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations, issued by the CEDAW Committee in 2013, specifically recommends that States parties, among others, ensure (a) women\u2019s participation in all stages of DDR processes; (b) that DDR processes specifically target female combatants and women and girls associated with armed groups and that barriers to their equitable participation are addressed; (c) that mental health and psychosocial support as well as other support services are provided to them; and (d) that DDR processes specifically address women\u2019s distinct needs in order to provide age and gender-specific DDR support. \\n The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) (CRPD) clarifies and qualifies how all categories of rights apply to persons with disabilities and identifies areas where adaptations have to be made for persons with disabilities to effectively exercise their rights, and where protection of rights must be reinforced. This is also relevant for people with psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities, and is a key legislative framework addressing their human rights including the right to quality services and the right to community integration. \\n The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) (ICPPED) establishes that enforced disappearances are prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or other public emergency.", + "Paragraph": "The main sources of international human rights law are: \n The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR) was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. It set out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected. \n The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (ICCPR) establishes a range of civil and political rights, including rights of due process and equality before the law, freedom of movement and association, freedom of religion and political opinion, and the right to liberty and security of person. \n The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) (ICESCR) establishes the rights of individuals and duties of States to provide for the basic needs of all persons, including access to employment, education and health care. \n The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984) (CAT) establishes that torture is prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war, internal political instability or other public emergency, and regardless of the orders of superiors or public authorities. \n The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) (CRC) and the Optional Protocol to the CRC on Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000) recognize the special status of children and reconfirm their rights, as well as States\u2019 duty to protect children in a number of specific settings, including during armed conflict. The Optional Protocol is particularly relevant to the DDR context, as it concerns the rights of children involved in armed conflict. \n The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) (CEDAW) defines what constitutes discrimination against women and sets up an agenda for national action to end it. CEDAW provides the basis for realizing equality between women and men through ensuring women\u2019s equal access to, and equal opportunities in, political and public life \u2013 including the right to vote and to stand for election \u2013 as well as education, health and employment. States parties agree to take all appropriate measures, including legislation and temporary special measures, so that women can enjoy all their human rights and fundamental freedoms. General recommendation No. 30 on women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations, issued by the CEDAW Committee in 2013, specifically recommends that States parties, among others, ensure (a) women\u2019s participation in all stages of DDR processes; (b) that DDR processes specifically target female combatants and women and girls associated with armed groups and that barriers to their equitable participation are addressed; (c) that mental health and psychosocial support as well as other support services are provided to them; and (d) that DDR processes specifically address women\u2019s distinct needs in order to provide age and gender-specific DDR support. \n The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) (CRPD) clarifies and qualifies how all categories of rights apply to persons with disabilities and identifies areas where adaptations have to be made for persons with disabilities to effectively exercise their rights, and where protection of rights must be reinforced. This is also relevant for people with psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities, and is a key legislative framework addressing their human rights including the right to quality services and the right to community integration. \n The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) (ICPPED) establishes that enforced disappearances are prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or other public emergency.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -18595,7 +18595,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 391, - "Paragraph": "The main sources of international human rights law are: \\n The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR) was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. It set out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected. \\n The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (ICCPR) establishes a range of civil and political rights, including rights of due process and equality before the law, freedom of movement and association, freedom of religion and political opinion, and the right to liberty and security of person. \\n The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) (ICESCR) establishes the rights of individuals and duties of States to provide for the basic needs of all persons, including access to employment, education and health care. \\n The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984) (CAT) establishes that torture is prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war, internal political instability or other public emergency, and regardless of the orders of superiors or public authorities. \\n The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) (CRC) and the Optional Protocol to the CRC on Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000) recognize the special status of children and reconfirm their rights, as well as States\u2019 duty to protect children in a number of specific settings, including during armed conflict. The Optional Protocol is particularly relevant to the DDR context, as it concerns the rights of children involved in armed conflict. \\n The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) (CEDAW) defines what constitutes discrimination against women and sets up an agenda for national action to end it. CEDAW provides the basis for realizing equality between women and men through ensuring women\u2019s equal access to, and equal opportunities in, political and public life \u2013 including the right to vote and to stand for election \u2013 as well as education, health and employment. States parties agree to take all appropriate measures, including legislation and temporary special measures, so that women can enjoy all their human rights and fundamental freedoms. General recommendation No. 30 on women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations, issued by the CEDAW Committee in 2013, specifically recommends that States parties, among others, ensure (a) women\u2019s participation in all stages of DDR processes; (b) that DDR processes specifically target female combatants and women and girls associated with armed groups and that barriers to their equitable participation are addressed; (c) that mental health and psychosocial support as well as other support services are provided to them; and (d) that DDR processes specifically address women\u2019s distinct needs in order to provide age and gender-specific DDR support. \\n The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) (CRPD) clarifies and qualifies how all categories of rights apply to persons with disabilities and identifies areas where adaptations have to be made for persons with disabilities to effectively exercise their rights, and where protection of rights must be reinforced. This is also relevant for people with psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities, and is a key legislative framework addressing their human rights including the right to quality services and the right to community integration. \\n The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) (ICPPED) establishes that enforced disappearances are prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or other public emergency.", + "Paragraph": "The main sources of international human rights law are: \n The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR) was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. It set out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected. \n The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (ICCPR) establishes a range of civil and political rights, including rights of due process and equality before the law, freedom of movement and association, freedom of religion and political opinion, and the right to liberty and security of person. \n The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) (ICESCR) establishes the rights of individuals and duties of States to provide for the basic needs of all persons, including access to employment, education and health care. \n The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984) (CAT) establishes that torture is prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war, internal political instability or other public emergency, and regardless of the orders of superiors or public authorities. \n The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) (CRC) and the Optional Protocol to the CRC on Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000) recognize the special status of children and reconfirm their rights, as well as States\u2019 duty to protect children in a number of specific settings, including during armed conflict. The Optional Protocol is particularly relevant to the DDR context, as it concerns the rights of children involved in armed conflict. \n The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) (CEDAW) defines what constitutes discrimination against women and sets up an agenda for national action to end it. CEDAW provides the basis for realizing equality between women and men through ensuring women\u2019s equal access to, and equal opportunities in, political and public life \u2013 including the right to vote and to stand for election \u2013 as well as education, health and employment. States parties agree to take all appropriate measures, including legislation and temporary special measures, so that women can enjoy all their human rights and fundamental freedoms. General recommendation No. 30 on women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations, issued by the CEDAW Committee in 2013, specifically recommends that States parties, among others, ensure (a) women\u2019s participation in all stages of DDR processes; (b) that DDR processes specifically target female combatants and women and girls associated with armed groups and that barriers to their equitable participation are addressed; (c) that mental health and psychosocial support as well as other support services are provided to them; and (d) that DDR processes specifically address women\u2019s distinct needs in order to provide age and gender-specific DDR support. \n The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) (CRPD) clarifies and qualifies how all categories of rights apply to persons with disabilities and identifies areas where adaptations have to be made for persons with disabilities to effectively exercise their rights, and where protection of rights must be reinforced. This is also relevant for people with psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities, and is a key legislative framework addressing their human rights including the right to quality services and the right to community integration. \n The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) (ICPPED) establishes that enforced disappearances are prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or other public emergency.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -18613,7 +18613,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 391, - "Paragraph": "The main sources of international human rights law are: \\n The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR) was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. It set out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected. \\n The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (ICCPR) establishes a range of civil and political rights, including rights of due process and equality before the law, freedom of movement and association, freedom of religion and political opinion, and the right to liberty and security of person. \\n The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) (ICESCR) establishes the rights of individuals and duties of States to provide for the basic needs of all persons, including access to employment, education and health care. \\n The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984) (CAT) establishes that torture is prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war, internal political instability or other public emergency, and regardless of the orders of superiors or public authorities. \\n The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) (CRC) and the Optional Protocol to the CRC on Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000) recognize the special status of children and reconfirm their rights, as well as States\u2019 duty to protect children in a number of specific settings, including during armed conflict. The Optional Protocol is particularly relevant to the DDR context, as it concerns the rights of children involved in armed conflict. \\n The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) (CEDAW) defines what constitutes discrimination against women and sets up an agenda for national action to end it. CEDAW provides the basis for realizing equality between women and men through ensuring women\u2019s equal access to, and equal opportunities in, political and public life \u2013 including the right to vote and to stand for election \u2013 as well as education, health and employment. States parties agree to take all appropriate measures, including legislation and temporary special measures, so that women can enjoy all their human rights and fundamental freedoms. General recommendation No. 30 on women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations, issued by the CEDAW Committee in 2013, specifically recommends that States parties, among others, ensure (a) women\u2019s participation in all stages of DDR processes; (b) that DDR processes specifically target female combatants and women and girls associated with armed groups and that barriers to their equitable participation are addressed; (c) that mental health and psychosocial support as well as other support services are provided to them; and (d) that DDR processes specifically address women\u2019s distinct needs in order to provide age and gender-specific DDR support. \\n The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) (CRPD) clarifies and qualifies how all categories of rights apply to persons with disabilities and identifies areas where adaptations have to be made for persons with disabilities to effectively exercise their rights, and where protection of rights must be reinforced. This is also relevant for people with psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities, and is a key legislative framework addressing their human rights including the right to quality services and the right to community integration. \\n The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) (ICPPED) establishes that enforced disappearances are prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or other public emergency.", + "Paragraph": "The main sources of international human rights law are: \n The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR) was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. It set out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected. \n The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (ICCPR) establishes a range of civil and political rights, including rights of due process and equality before the law, freedom of movement and association, freedom of religion and political opinion, and the right to liberty and security of person. \n The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) (ICESCR) establishes the rights of individuals and duties of States to provide for the basic needs of all persons, including access to employment, education and health care. \n The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984) (CAT) establishes that torture is prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war, internal political instability or other public emergency, and regardless of the orders of superiors or public authorities. \n The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) (CRC) and the Optional Protocol to the CRC on Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000) recognize the special status of children and reconfirm their rights, as well as States\u2019 duty to protect children in a number of specific settings, including during armed conflict. The Optional Protocol is particularly relevant to the DDR context, as it concerns the rights of children involved in armed conflict. \n The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) (CEDAW) defines what constitutes discrimination against women and sets up an agenda for national action to end it. CEDAW provides the basis for realizing equality between women and men through ensuring women\u2019s equal access to, and equal opportunities in, political and public life \u2013 including the right to vote and to stand for election \u2013 as well as education, health and employment. States parties agree to take all appropriate measures, including legislation and temporary special measures, so that women can enjoy all their human rights and fundamental freedoms. General recommendation No. 30 on women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations, issued by the CEDAW Committee in 2013, specifically recommends that States parties, among others, ensure (a) women\u2019s participation in all stages of DDR processes; (b) that DDR processes specifically target female combatants and women and girls associated with armed groups and that barriers to their equitable participation are addressed; (c) that mental health and psychosocial support as well as other support services are provided to them; and (d) that DDR processes specifically address women\u2019s distinct needs in order to provide age and gender-specific DDR support. \n The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) (CRPD) clarifies and qualifies how all categories of rights apply to persons with disabilities and identifies areas where adaptations have to be made for persons with disabilities to effectively exercise their rights, and where protection of rights must be reinforced. This is also relevant for people with psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities, and is a key legislative framework addressing their human rights including the right to quality services and the right to community integration. \n The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) (ICPPED) establishes that enforced disappearances are prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or other public emergency.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -18624,14 +18624,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.2 International humanitarian law", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) (CRPD) clarifies and qualifies how all categories of rights apply to persons with disabilities and identifies areas where adaptations have to be made for persons with disabilities to effectively exercise their rights, and where protection of rights must be reinforced.", + "Sentence": "\n The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) (CRPD) clarifies and qualifies how all categories of rights apply to persons with disabilities and identifies areas where adaptations have to be made for persons with disabilities to effectively exercise their rights, and where protection of rights must be reinforced.", "newParagraph": "main source international human right law n universal declaration human right 1948 udhr proclaimed un general assembly paris 10 december 1948 common standard achievement people nation set first time fundamental human right universally protected n international covenant civil political right 1966 iccpr establishes range civil political right including right due process equality law freedom movement association freedom religion political opinion right liberty security person n international covenant economic social cultural right 1966 icescr establishes right individual duty state provide basic need person including access employment education health care n convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 1984 cat establishes torture prohibited circumstance including time war internal political instability public emergency regardless order superior public authority n convention right child 1989 crc optional protocol crc involvement child armed conflict 2000 recognize special status child reconfirm right well state duty protect child number specific setting including armed conflict optional protocol particularly relevant ddr context concern right child involved armed conflict n convention elimination form discrimination woman 1979 cedaw defines constitutes discrimination woman set agenda national action end cedaw provides basis realizing equality woman men ensuring woman equal access equal opportunity political public life including right vote stand election well education health employment state party agree take appropriate measure including legislation temporary special measure woman enjoy human right fundamental freedom general recommendation 30 woman conflict prevention conflict postconflict situation issued cedaw committee 2013 specifically recommends state party among others ensure woman participation stage ddr process b ddr process specifically target female combatant woman girl associated armed group barrier equitable participation addressed c mental health psychosocial support well support service provided ddr process specifically address woman distinct need order provide age genderspecific ddr support n convention right person disability 2006 crpd clarifies qualifies category right apply person disability identifies area adaptation made person disability effectively exercise right protection right must reinforced also relevant people psychosocial intellectual cognitive disability key legislative framework addressing human right including right quality service right community integration n international convention protection person enforced disappearance 2006 icpped establishes enforced disappearance prohibited circumstance including time war threat war internal political instability public emergency", "ProcessedSent": "n convention right person disability 2006 crpd clarifies qualifies category right apply person disability identifies area adaptation made person disability effectively exercise right protection right must reinforced", "SentID": 1034 }, { "ParagraphID": 391, - "Paragraph": "The main sources of international human rights law are: \\n The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR) was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. It set out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected. \\n The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (ICCPR) establishes a range of civil and political rights, including rights of due process and equality before the law, freedom of movement and association, freedom of religion and political opinion, and the right to liberty and security of person. \\n The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) (ICESCR) establishes the rights of individuals and duties of States to provide for the basic needs of all persons, including access to employment, education and health care. \\n The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984) (CAT) establishes that torture is prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war, internal political instability or other public emergency, and regardless of the orders of superiors or public authorities. \\n The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) (CRC) and the Optional Protocol to the CRC on Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000) recognize the special status of children and reconfirm their rights, as well as States\u2019 duty to protect children in a number of specific settings, including during armed conflict. The Optional Protocol is particularly relevant to the DDR context, as it concerns the rights of children involved in armed conflict. \\n The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) (CEDAW) defines what constitutes discrimination against women and sets up an agenda for national action to end it. CEDAW provides the basis for realizing equality between women and men through ensuring women\u2019s equal access to, and equal opportunities in, political and public life \u2013 including the right to vote and to stand for election \u2013 as well as education, health and employment. States parties agree to take all appropriate measures, including legislation and temporary special measures, so that women can enjoy all their human rights and fundamental freedoms. General recommendation No. 30 on women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations, issued by the CEDAW Committee in 2013, specifically recommends that States parties, among others, ensure (a) women\u2019s participation in all stages of DDR processes; (b) that DDR processes specifically target female combatants and women and girls associated with armed groups and that barriers to their equitable participation are addressed; (c) that mental health and psychosocial support as well as other support services are provided to them; and (d) that DDR processes specifically address women\u2019s distinct needs in order to provide age and gender-specific DDR support. \\n The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) (CRPD) clarifies and qualifies how all categories of rights apply to persons with disabilities and identifies areas where adaptations have to be made for persons with disabilities to effectively exercise their rights, and where protection of rights must be reinforced. This is also relevant for people with psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities, and is a key legislative framework addressing their human rights including the right to quality services and the right to community integration. \\n The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) (ICPPED) establishes that enforced disappearances are prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or other public emergency.", + "Paragraph": "The main sources of international human rights law are: \n The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR) was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. It set out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected. \n The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (ICCPR) establishes a range of civil and political rights, including rights of due process and equality before the law, freedom of movement and association, freedom of religion and political opinion, and the right to liberty and security of person. \n The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) (ICESCR) establishes the rights of individuals and duties of States to provide for the basic needs of all persons, including access to employment, education and health care. \n The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984) (CAT) establishes that torture is prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war, internal political instability or other public emergency, and regardless of the orders of superiors or public authorities. \n The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) (CRC) and the Optional Protocol to the CRC on Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000) recognize the special status of children and reconfirm their rights, as well as States\u2019 duty to protect children in a number of specific settings, including during armed conflict. The Optional Protocol is particularly relevant to the DDR context, as it concerns the rights of children involved in armed conflict. \n The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) (CEDAW) defines what constitutes discrimination against women and sets up an agenda for national action to end it. CEDAW provides the basis for realizing equality between women and men through ensuring women\u2019s equal access to, and equal opportunities in, political and public life \u2013 including the right to vote and to stand for election \u2013 as well as education, health and employment. States parties agree to take all appropriate measures, including legislation and temporary special measures, so that women can enjoy all their human rights and fundamental freedoms. General recommendation No. 30 on women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations, issued by the CEDAW Committee in 2013, specifically recommends that States parties, among others, ensure (a) women\u2019s participation in all stages of DDR processes; (b) that DDR processes specifically target female combatants and women and girls associated with armed groups and that barriers to their equitable participation are addressed; (c) that mental health and psychosocial support as well as other support services are provided to them; and (d) that DDR processes specifically address women\u2019s distinct needs in order to provide age and gender-specific DDR support. \n The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) (CRPD) clarifies and qualifies how all categories of rights apply to persons with disabilities and identifies areas where adaptations have to be made for persons with disabilities to effectively exercise their rights, and where protection of rights must be reinforced. This is also relevant for people with psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities, and is a key legislative framework addressing their human rights including the right to quality services and the right to community integration. \n The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) (ICPPED) establishes that enforced disappearances are prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or other public emergency.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -18649,7 +18649,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 391, - "Paragraph": "The main sources of international human rights law are: \\n The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR) was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. It set out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected. \\n The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (ICCPR) establishes a range of civil and political rights, including rights of due process and equality before the law, freedom of movement and association, freedom of religion and political opinion, and the right to liberty and security of person. \\n The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) (ICESCR) establishes the rights of individuals and duties of States to provide for the basic needs of all persons, including access to employment, education and health care. \\n The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984) (CAT) establishes that torture is prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war, internal political instability or other public emergency, and regardless of the orders of superiors or public authorities. \\n The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) (CRC) and the Optional Protocol to the CRC on Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000) recognize the special status of children and reconfirm their rights, as well as States\u2019 duty to protect children in a number of specific settings, including during armed conflict. The Optional Protocol is particularly relevant to the DDR context, as it concerns the rights of children involved in armed conflict. \\n The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) (CEDAW) defines what constitutes discrimination against women and sets up an agenda for national action to end it. CEDAW provides the basis for realizing equality between women and men through ensuring women\u2019s equal access to, and equal opportunities in, political and public life \u2013 including the right to vote and to stand for election \u2013 as well as education, health and employment. States parties agree to take all appropriate measures, including legislation and temporary special measures, so that women can enjoy all their human rights and fundamental freedoms. General recommendation No. 30 on women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations, issued by the CEDAW Committee in 2013, specifically recommends that States parties, among others, ensure (a) women\u2019s participation in all stages of DDR processes; (b) that DDR processes specifically target female combatants and women and girls associated with armed groups and that barriers to their equitable participation are addressed; (c) that mental health and psychosocial support as well as other support services are provided to them; and (d) that DDR processes specifically address women\u2019s distinct needs in order to provide age and gender-specific DDR support. \\n The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) (CRPD) clarifies and qualifies how all categories of rights apply to persons with disabilities and identifies areas where adaptations have to be made for persons with disabilities to effectively exercise their rights, and where protection of rights must be reinforced. This is also relevant for people with psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities, and is a key legislative framework addressing their human rights including the right to quality services and the right to community integration. \\n The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) (ICPPED) establishes that enforced disappearances are prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or other public emergency.", + "Paragraph": "The main sources of international human rights law are: \n The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR) was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. It set out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected. \n The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (ICCPR) establishes a range of civil and political rights, including rights of due process and equality before the law, freedom of movement and association, freedom of religion and political opinion, and the right to liberty and security of person. \n The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) (ICESCR) establishes the rights of individuals and duties of States to provide for the basic needs of all persons, including access to employment, education and health care. \n The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984) (CAT) establishes that torture is prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war, internal political instability or other public emergency, and regardless of the orders of superiors or public authorities. \n The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) (CRC) and the Optional Protocol to the CRC on Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000) recognize the special status of children and reconfirm their rights, as well as States\u2019 duty to protect children in a number of specific settings, including during armed conflict. The Optional Protocol is particularly relevant to the DDR context, as it concerns the rights of children involved in armed conflict. \n The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) (CEDAW) defines what constitutes discrimination against women and sets up an agenda for national action to end it. CEDAW provides the basis for realizing equality between women and men through ensuring women\u2019s equal access to, and equal opportunities in, political and public life \u2013 including the right to vote and to stand for election \u2013 as well as education, health and employment. States parties agree to take all appropriate measures, including legislation and temporary special measures, so that women can enjoy all their human rights and fundamental freedoms. General recommendation No. 30 on women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations, issued by the CEDAW Committee in 2013, specifically recommends that States parties, among others, ensure (a) women\u2019s participation in all stages of DDR processes; (b) that DDR processes specifically target female combatants and women and girls associated with armed groups and that barriers to their equitable participation are addressed; (c) that mental health and psychosocial support as well as other support services are provided to them; and (d) that DDR processes specifically address women\u2019s distinct needs in order to provide age and gender-specific DDR support. \n The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) (CRPD) clarifies and qualifies how all categories of rights apply to persons with disabilities and identifies areas where adaptations have to be made for persons with disabilities to effectively exercise their rights, and where protection of rights must be reinforced. This is also relevant for people with psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities, and is a key legislative framework addressing their human rights including the right to quality services and the right to community integration. \n The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) (ICPPED) establishes that enforced disappearances are prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or other public emergency.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -18660,14 +18660,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.2 International humanitarian law", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) (ICPPED) establishes that enforced disappearances are prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or other public emergency.", + "Sentence": "\n The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) (ICPPED) establishes that enforced disappearances are prohibited under all circumstances, including in times of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or other public emergency.", "newParagraph": "main source international human right law n universal declaration human right 1948 udhr proclaimed un general assembly paris 10 december 1948 common standard achievement people nation set first time fundamental human right universally protected n international covenant civil political right 1966 iccpr establishes range civil political right including right due process equality law freedom movement association freedom religion political opinion right liberty security person n international covenant economic social cultural right 1966 icescr establishes right individual duty state provide basic need person including access employment education health care n convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 1984 cat establishes torture prohibited circumstance including time war internal political instability public emergency regardless order superior public authority n convention right child 1989 crc optional protocol crc involvement child armed conflict 2000 recognize special status child reconfirm right well state duty protect child number specific setting including armed conflict optional protocol particularly relevant ddr context concern right child involved armed conflict n convention elimination form discrimination woman 1979 cedaw defines constitutes discrimination woman set agenda national action end cedaw provides basis realizing equality woman men ensuring woman equal access equal opportunity political public life including right vote stand election well education health employment state party agree take appropriate measure including legislation temporary special measure woman enjoy human right fundamental freedom general recommendation 30 woman conflict prevention conflict postconflict situation issued cedaw committee 2013 specifically recommends state party among others ensure woman participation stage ddr process b ddr process specifically target female combatant woman girl associated armed group barrier equitable participation addressed c mental health psychosocial support well support service provided ddr process specifically address woman distinct need order provide age genderspecific ddr support n convention right person disability 2006 crpd clarifies qualifies category right apply person disability identifies area adaptation made person disability effectively exercise right protection right must reinforced also relevant people psychosocial intellectual cognitive disability key legislative framework addressing human right including right quality service right community integration n international convention protection person enforced disappearance 2006 icpped establishes enforced disappearance prohibited circumstance including time war threat war internal political instability public emergency", "ProcessedSent": "n international convention protection person enforced disappearance 2006 icpped establishes enforced disappearance prohibited circumstance including time war threat war internal political instability public emergency", "SentID": 1036 }, { "ParagraphID": 392, - "Paragraph": "The following rights enshrined in these instruments are particularly relevant, as they often arise within the DDR context, especially with regard to the treatment of persons located in DDR facilities (including but not limited to encampments): \\n Right to life (article 3 of UDHR; article 6 of ICCPR; article 6 of CRC; article 10 of CRPD); \\n Right to freedom from torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (article 5 of UDHR; article 7 of ICCPR; article 2 of CAT; article 37(a) of CRC; article 15 of CRPD); \\n Right to liberty and security of person, which includes the prohibition of arbitrary arrest or detention (article 9 of UDHR; article 9(1) of ICCPR; article 37 of CRC); \\n Right to fair trial (article 10 of UDHR; article 9 of ICCPR; article 40(2)(iii) of CRC); \\n Right to be free from discrimination (article 2 of UDHR; articles 2 and 24 of ICCPR; article 2 of CRC; article 2 of CEDAW; article 5 of CRPD); and \\n Rights of the child, including considering the best interests of the child (article 3 of CRC; article 7(2) of CRPD), and protection from all forms of physical or mental violence, injury or abuse, neglect or negligent treatment, maltreatment or exploitation (article 19 of CRC).", + "Paragraph": "The following rights enshrined in these instruments are particularly relevant, as they often arise within the DDR context, especially with regard to the treatment of persons located in DDR facilities (including but not limited to encampments): \n Right to life (article 3 of UDHR; article 6 of ICCPR; article 6 of CRC; article 10 of CRPD); \n Right to freedom from torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (article 5 of UDHR; article 7 of ICCPR; article 2 of CAT; article 37(a) of CRC; article 15 of CRPD); \n Right to liberty and security of person, which includes the prohibition of arbitrary arrest or detention (article 9 of UDHR; article 9(1) of ICCPR; article 37 of CRC); \n Right to fair trial (article 10 of UDHR; article 9 of ICCPR; article 40(2)(iii) of CRC); \n Right to be free from discrimination (article 2 of UDHR; articles 2 and 24 of ICCPR; article 2 of CRC; article 2 of CEDAW; article 5 of CRPD); and \n Rights of the child, including considering the best interests of the child (article 3 of CRC; article 7(2) of CRPD), and protection from all forms of physical or mental violence, injury or abuse, neglect or negligent treatment, maltreatment or exploitation (article 19 of CRC).", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -18678,7 +18678,7 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.2 International humanitarian law", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The following rights enshrined in these instruments are particularly relevant, as they often arise within the DDR context, especially with regard to the treatment of persons located in DDR facilities (including but not limited to encampments): \\n Right to life (article 3 of UDHR; article 6 of ICCPR; article 6 of CRC; article 10 of CRPD); \\n Right to freedom from torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (article 5 of UDHR; article 7 of ICCPR; article 2 of CAT; article 37(a) of CRC; article 15 of CRPD); \\n Right to liberty and security of person, which includes the prohibition of arbitrary arrest or detention (article 9 of UDHR; article 9(1) of ICCPR; article 37 of CRC); \\n Right to fair trial (article 10 of UDHR; article 9 of ICCPR; article 40(2)(iii) of CRC); \\n Right to be free from discrimination (article 2 of UDHR; articles 2 and 24 of ICCPR; article 2 of CRC; article 2 of CEDAW; article 5 of CRPD); and \\n Rights of the child, including considering the best interests of the child (article 3 of CRC; article 7(2) of CRPD), and protection from all forms of physical or mental violence, injury or abuse, neglect or negligent treatment, maltreatment or exploitation (article 19 of CRC).", + "Sentence": "The following rights enshrined in these instruments are particularly relevant, as they often arise within the DDR context, especially with regard to the treatment of persons located in DDR facilities (including but not limited to encampments): \n Right to life (article 3 of UDHR; article 6 of ICCPR; article 6 of CRC; article 10 of CRPD); \n Right to freedom from torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (article 5 of UDHR; article 7 of ICCPR; article 2 of CAT; article 37(a) of CRC; article 15 of CRPD); \n Right to liberty and security of person, which includes the prohibition of arbitrary arrest or detention (article 9 of UDHR; article 9(1) of ICCPR; article 37 of CRC); \n Right to fair trial (article 10 of UDHR; article 9 of ICCPR; article 40(2)(iii) of CRC); \n Right to be free from discrimination (article 2 of UDHR; articles 2 and 24 of ICCPR; article 2 of CRC; article 2 of CEDAW; article 5 of CRPD); and \n Rights of the child, including considering the best interests of the child (article 3 of CRC; article 7(2) of CRPD), and protection from all forms of physical or mental violence, injury or abuse, neglect or negligent treatment, maltreatment or exploitation (article 19 of CRC).", "newParagraph": "following right enshrined instrument particularly relevant often arise within ddr context especially regard treatment person located ddr facility including limited encampment n right life article 3 udhr article 6 iccpr article 6 crc article 10 crpd n right freedom torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment article 5 udhr article 7 iccpr article 2 cat article 37a crc article 15 crpd n right liberty security person includes prohibition arbitrary arrest detention article 9 udhr article 91 iccpr article 37 crc n right fair trial article 10 udhr article 9 iccpr article 402iii crc n right free discrimination article 2 udhr article 2 24 iccpr article 2 crc article 2 cedaw article 5 crpd n right child including considering best interest child article 3 crc article 72 crpd protection form physical mental violence injury abuse neglect negligent treatment maltreatment exploitation article 19 crc", "ProcessedSent": "following right enshrined instrument particularly relevant often arise within ddr context especially regard treatment person located ddr facility including limited encampment n right life article 3 udhr article 6 iccpr article 6 crc article 10 crpd n right freedom torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment article 5 udhr article 7 iccpr article 2 cat article 37a crc article 15 crpd n right liberty security person includes prohibition arbitrary arrest detention article 9 udhr article 91 iccpr article 37 crc n right fair trial article 10 udhr article 9 iccpr article 402iii crc n right free discrimination article 2 udhr article 2 24 iccpr article 2 crc article 2 cedaw article 5 crpd n right child including considering best interest child article 3 crc article 72 crpd protection form physical mental violence injury abuse neglect negligent treatment maltreatment exploitation article 19 crc", "SentID": 1037 @@ -18847,7 +18847,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 396, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of the international human rights instruments that guide the UN in supporting DDR processes. \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of the relevant domestic legislation that provides for the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries within the Member State where the DDR process is being undertaken. \\n DDR practitioners shall take the necessary precautions, special measures or actions to protect and ensure the human rights of DDR participants and beneficiaries. \\n DDR practitioners shall report and seek legal advice in the event that they witness any violations of human rights by national authorities within a UN-supported DDR facility.", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware of the international human rights instruments that guide the UN in supporting DDR processes. \n DDR practitioners should be aware of the relevant domestic legislation that provides for the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries within the Member State where the DDR process is being undertaken. \n DDR practitioners shall take the necessary precautions, special measures or actions to protect and ensure the human rights of DDR participants and beneficiaries. \n DDR practitioners shall report and seek legal advice in the event that they witness any violations of human rights by national authorities within a UN-supported DDR facility.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -18858,14 +18858,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.2 International humanitarian law", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of the international human rights instruments that guide the UN in supporting DDR processes.", + "Sentence": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware of the international human rights instruments that guide the UN in supporting DDR processes.", "newParagraph": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner aware international human right instrument guide un supporting ddr process n ddr practitioner aware relevant domestic legislation provides right freedom ddr participant beneficiary within member state ddr process undertaken n ddr practitioner shall take necessary precaution special measure action protect ensure human right ddr participant beneficiary n ddr practitioner shall report seek legal advice event witness violation human right national authority within unsupported ddr facility", "ProcessedSent": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner aware international human right instrument guide un supporting ddr process", "SentID": 1047 }, { "ParagraphID": 396, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of the international human rights instruments that guide the UN in supporting DDR processes. \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of the relevant domestic legislation that provides for the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries within the Member State where the DDR process is being undertaken. \\n DDR practitioners shall take the necessary precautions, special measures or actions to protect and ensure the human rights of DDR participants and beneficiaries. \\n DDR practitioners shall report and seek legal advice in the event that they witness any violations of human rights by national authorities within a UN-supported DDR facility.", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware of the international human rights instruments that guide the UN in supporting DDR processes. \n DDR practitioners should be aware of the relevant domestic legislation that provides for the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries within the Member State where the DDR process is being undertaken. \n DDR practitioners shall take the necessary precautions, special measures or actions to protect and ensure the human rights of DDR participants and beneficiaries. \n DDR practitioners shall report and seek legal advice in the event that they witness any violations of human rights by national authorities within a UN-supported DDR facility.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -18876,14 +18876,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.2 International humanitarian law", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n DDR practitioners should be aware of the relevant domestic legislation that provides for the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries within the Member State where the DDR process is being undertaken.", + "Sentence": "\n DDR practitioners should be aware of the relevant domestic legislation that provides for the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries within the Member State where the DDR process is being undertaken.", "newParagraph": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner aware international human right instrument guide un supporting ddr process n ddr practitioner aware relevant domestic legislation provides right freedom ddr participant beneficiary within member state ddr process undertaken n ddr practitioner shall take necessary precaution special measure action protect ensure human right ddr participant beneficiary n ddr practitioner shall report seek legal advice event witness violation human right national authority within unsupported ddr facility", "ProcessedSent": "n ddr practitioner aware relevant domestic legislation provides right freedom ddr participant beneficiary within member state ddr process undertaken", "SentID": 1048 }, { "ParagraphID": 396, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of the international human rights instruments that guide the UN in supporting DDR processes. \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of the relevant domestic legislation that provides for the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries within the Member State where the DDR process is being undertaken. \\n DDR practitioners shall take the necessary precautions, special measures or actions to protect and ensure the human rights of DDR participants and beneficiaries. \\n DDR practitioners shall report and seek legal advice in the event that they witness any violations of human rights by national authorities within a UN-supported DDR facility.", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware of the international human rights instruments that guide the UN in supporting DDR processes. \n DDR practitioners should be aware of the relevant domestic legislation that provides for the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries within the Member State where the DDR process is being undertaken. \n DDR practitioners shall take the necessary precautions, special measures or actions to protect and ensure the human rights of DDR participants and beneficiaries. \n DDR practitioners shall report and seek legal advice in the event that they witness any violations of human rights by national authorities within a UN-supported DDR facility.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -18894,14 +18894,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.2 International humanitarian law", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n DDR practitioners shall take the necessary precautions, special measures or actions to protect and ensure the human rights of DDR participants and beneficiaries.", + "Sentence": "\n DDR practitioners shall take the necessary precautions, special measures or actions to protect and ensure the human rights of DDR participants and beneficiaries.", "newParagraph": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner aware international human right instrument guide un supporting ddr process n ddr practitioner aware relevant domestic legislation provides right freedom ddr participant beneficiary within member state ddr process undertaken n ddr practitioner shall take necessary precaution special measure action protect ensure human right ddr participant beneficiary n ddr practitioner shall report seek legal advice event witness violation human right national authority within unsupported ddr facility", "ProcessedSent": "n ddr practitioner shall take necessary precaution special measure action protect ensure human right ddr participant beneficiary", "SentID": 1049 }, { "ParagraphID": 396, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of the international human rights instruments that guide the UN in supporting DDR processes. \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of the relevant domestic legislation that provides for the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries within the Member State where the DDR process is being undertaken. \\n DDR practitioners shall take the necessary precautions, special measures or actions to protect and ensure the human rights of DDR participants and beneficiaries. \\n DDR practitioners shall report and seek legal advice in the event that they witness any violations of human rights by national authorities within a UN-supported DDR facility.", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware of the international human rights instruments that guide the UN in supporting DDR processes. \n DDR practitioners should be aware of the relevant domestic legislation that provides for the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries within the Member State where the DDR process is being undertaken. \n DDR practitioners shall take the necessary precautions, special measures or actions to protect and ensure the human rights of DDR participants and beneficiaries. \n DDR practitioners shall report and seek legal advice in the event that they witness any violations of human rights by national authorities within a UN-supported DDR facility.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -18912,14 +18912,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.2 International humanitarian law", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n DDR practitioners shall report and seek legal advice in the event that they witness any violations of human rights by national authorities within a UN-supported DDR facility.", + "Sentence": "\n DDR practitioners shall report and seek legal advice in the event that they witness any violations of human rights by national authorities within a UN-supported DDR facility.", "newParagraph": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner aware international human right instrument guide un supporting ddr process n ddr practitioner aware relevant domestic legislation provides right freedom ddr participant beneficiary within member state ddr process undertaken n ddr practitioner shall take necessary precaution special measure action protect ensure human right ddr participant beneficiary n ddr practitioner shall report seek legal advice event witness violation human right national authority within unsupported ddr facility", "ProcessedSent": "n ddr practitioner shall report seek legal advice event witness violation human right national authority within unsupported ddr facility", "SentID": 1050 }, { "ParagraphID": 397, - "Paragraph": "Red lines \\n DDR practitioners shall not facilitate any violations of human rights by national authorities within a UN-supported DDR facility.", + "Paragraph": "Red lines \n DDR practitioners shall not facilitate any violations of human rights by national authorities within a UN-supported DDR facility.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -18930,7 +18930,7 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.2 International humanitarian law", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Red lines \\n DDR practitioners shall not facilitate any violations of human rights by national authorities within a UN-supported DDR facility.", + "Sentence": "Red lines \n DDR practitioners shall not facilitate any violations of human rights by national authorities within a UN-supported DDR facility.", "newParagraph": "red line n ddr practitioner shall facilitate violation human right national authority within unsupported ddr facility", "ProcessedSent": "red line n ddr practitioner shall facilitate violation human right national authority within unsupported ddr facility", "SentID": 1051 @@ -19027,7 +19027,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 401, - "Paragraph": "However, articles 1C to 1F of the 1951 Convention provide for circumstances in which it shall not apply to a person who would otherwise fall within the general definition of a refugee. In the context of situations involving DDR processes, article 1F is of particular relevance, in that it stipulates that the provisions of the 1951 Convention shall not apply to any person with respect to whom there are serious reasons for considering that he or she has: \\n committed a crime against peace, a war crime or a crime against humanity, as defined in relevant international instruments; \\n committed a serious non-political crime outside the country of refuge prior to the person\u2019s admission to that country as a refugee; or \\n been guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the UN.", + "Paragraph": "However, articles 1C to 1F of the 1951 Convention provide for circumstances in which it shall not apply to a person who would otherwise fall within the general definition of a refugee. In the context of situations involving DDR processes, article 1F is of particular relevance, in that it stipulates that the provisions of the 1951 Convention shall not apply to any person with respect to whom there are serious reasons for considering that he or she has: \n committed a crime against peace, a war crime or a crime against humanity, as defined in relevant international instruments; \n committed a serious non-political crime outside the country of refuge prior to the person\u2019s admission to that country as a refugee; or \n been guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the UN.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -19045,7 +19045,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 401, - "Paragraph": "However, articles 1C to 1F of the 1951 Convention provide for circumstances in which it shall not apply to a person who would otherwise fall within the general definition of a refugee. In the context of situations involving DDR processes, article 1F is of particular relevance, in that it stipulates that the provisions of the 1951 Convention shall not apply to any person with respect to whom there are serious reasons for considering that he or she has: \\n committed a crime against peace, a war crime or a crime against humanity, as defined in relevant international instruments; \\n committed a serious non-political crime outside the country of refuge prior to the person\u2019s admission to that country as a refugee; or \\n been guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the UN.", + "Paragraph": "However, articles 1C to 1F of the 1951 Convention provide for circumstances in which it shall not apply to a person who would otherwise fall within the general definition of a refugee. In the context of situations involving DDR processes, article 1F is of particular relevance, in that it stipulates that the provisions of the 1951 Convention shall not apply to any person with respect to whom there are serious reasons for considering that he or she has: \n committed a crime against peace, a war crime or a crime against humanity, as defined in relevant international instruments; \n committed a serious non-political crime outside the country of refuge prior to the person\u2019s admission to that country as a refugee; or \n been guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the UN.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -19056,7 +19056,7 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.3 International refugee law and internally displaced persons", "Heading4": "i. International refugee law", - "Sentence": "In the context of situations involving DDR processes, article 1F is of particular relevance, in that it stipulates that the provisions of the 1951 Convention shall not apply to any person with respect to whom there are serious reasons for considering that he or she has: \\n committed a crime against peace, a war crime or a crime against humanity, as defined in relevant international instruments; \\n committed a serious non-political crime outside the country of refuge prior to the person\u2019s admission to that country as a refugee; or \\n been guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the UN.", + "Sentence": "In the context of situations involving DDR processes, article 1F is of particular relevance, in that it stipulates that the provisions of the 1951 Convention shall not apply to any person with respect to whom there are serious reasons for considering that he or she has: \n committed a crime against peace, a war crime or a crime against humanity, as defined in relevant international instruments; \n committed a serious non-political crime outside the country of refuge prior to the person\u2019s admission to that country as a refugee; or \n been guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the UN.", "newParagraph": "however article 1c 1f 1951 convention provide circumstance shall apply person would otherwise fall within general definition refugee context situation involving ddr process article 1f particular relevance stipulates provision 1951 convention shall apply person respect serious reason considering n committed crime peace war crime crime humanity defined relevant international instrument n committed serious nonpolitical crime outside country refuge prior person admission country refugee n guilty act contrary purpose principle un", "ProcessedSent": "context situation involving ddr process article 1f particular relevance stipulates provision 1951 convention shall apply person respect serious reason considering n committed crime peace war crime crime humanity defined relevant international instrument n committed serious nonpolitical crime outside country refuge prior person admission country refugee n guilty act contrary purpose principle un", "SentID": 1058 @@ -19567,7 +19567,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 413, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of international refugee law and how it relates to UN DDR processes. \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of the principle of non-refoulement, which exists under both international human rights law and international refugee law, though with different conditions. \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of the relevant domestic legislation that provides for the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries within the Member State where the DDR process is carried out.", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware of international refugee law and how it relates to UN DDR processes. \n DDR practitioners should be aware of the principle of non-refoulement, which exists under both international human rights law and international refugee law, though with different conditions. \n DDR practitioners should be aware of the relevant domestic legislation that provides for the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries within the Member State where the DDR process is carried out.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -19578,14 +19578,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.3 International refugee law and internally displaced persons", "Heading4": "iii. Internally displaced persons", - "Sentence": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of international refugee law and how it relates to UN DDR processes.", + "Sentence": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware of international refugee law and how it relates to UN DDR processes.", "newParagraph": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner aware international refugee law relates un ddr process n ddr practitioner aware principle nonrefoulement exists international human right law international refugee law though different condition n ddr practitioner aware relevant domestic legislation provides right freedom ddr participant beneficiary within member state ddr process carried", "ProcessedSent": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner aware international refugee law relates un ddr process", "SentID": 1087 }, { "ParagraphID": 413, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of international refugee law and how it relates to UN DDR processes. \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of the principle of non-refoulement, which exists under both international human rights law and international refugee law, though with different conditions. \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of the relevant domestic legislation that provides for the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries within the Member State where the DDR process is carried out.", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware of international refugee law and how it relates to UN DDR processes. \n DDR practitioners should be aware of the principle of non-refoulement, which exists under both international human rights law and international refugee law, though with different conditions. \n DDR practitioners should be aware of the relevant domestic legislation that provides for the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries within the Member State where the DDR process is carried out.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -19596,14 +19596,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.3 International refugee law and internally displaced persons", "Heading4": "iii. Internally displaced persons", - "Sentence": "\\n DDR practitioners should be aware of the principle of non-refoulement, which exists under both international human rights law and international refugee law, though with different conditions.", + "Sentence": "\n DDR practitioners should be aware of the principle of non-refoulement, which exists under both international human rights law and international refugee law, though with different conditions.", "newParagraph": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner aware international refugee law relates un ddr process n ddr practitioner aware principle nonrefoulement exists international human right law international refugee law though different condition n ddr practitioner aware relevant domestic legislation provides right freedom ddr participant beneficiary within member state ddr process carried", "ProcessedSent": "n ddr practitioner aware principle nonrefoulement exists international human right law international refugee law though different condition", "SentID": 1088 }, { "ParagraphID": 413, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of international refugee law and how it relates to UN DDR processes. \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of the principle of non-refoulement, which exists under both international human rights law and international refugee law, though with different conditions. \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of the relevant domestic legislation that provides for the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries within the Member State where the DDR process is carried out.", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware of international refugee law and how it relates to UN DDR processes. \n DDR practitioners should be aware of the principle of non-refoulement, which exists under both international human rights law and international refugee law, though with different conditions. \n DDR practitioners should be aware of the relevant domestic legislation that provides for the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries within the Member State where the DDR process is carried out.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -19614,14 +19614,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.3 International refugee law and internally displaced persons", "Heading4": "iii. Internally displaced persons", - "Sentence": "\\n DDR practitioners should be aware of the relevant domestic legislation that provides for the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries within the Member State where the DDR process is carried out.", + "Sentence": "\n DDR practitioners should be aware of the relevant domestic legislation that provides for the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries within the Member State where the DDR process is carried out.", "newParagraph": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner aware international refugee law relates un ddr process n ddr practitioner aware principle nonrefoulement exists international human right law international refugee law though different condition n ddr practitioner aware relevant domestic legislation provides right freedom ddr participant beneficiary within member state ddr process carried", "ProcessedSent": "n ddr practitioner aware relevant domestic legislation provides right freedom ddr participant beneficiary within member state ddr process carried", "SentID": 1089 }, { "ParagraphID": 414, - "Paragraph": "Red lines \\n DDR practitioners shall not facilitate any violations of international refugee law by national authorities. In particular, they shall not facilitate any violations of the principle of non-refoulement including for DDR participants and beneficiaries who may not qualify as refugees.", + "Paragraph": "Red lines \n DDR practitioners shall not facilitate any violations of international refugee law by national authorities. In particular, they shall not facilitate any violations of the principle of non-refoulement including for DDR participants and beneficiaries who may not qualify as refugees.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -19632,14 +19632,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.3 International refugee law and internally displaced persons", "Heading4": "iii. Internally displaced persons", - "Sentence": "Red lines \\n DDR practitioners shall not facilitate any violations of international refugee law by national authorities.", + "Sentence": "Red lines \n DDR practitioners shall not facilitate any violations of international refugee law by national authorities.", "newParagraph": "red line n ddr practitioner shall facilitate violation international refugee law national authority particular shall facilitate violation principle nonrefoulement including ddr participant beneficiary may qualify refugee", "ProcessedSent": "red line n ddr practitioner shall facilitate violation international refugee law national authority", "SentID": 1090 }, { "ParagraphID": 414, - "Paragraph": "Red lines \\n DDR practitioners shall not facilitate any violations of international refugee law by national authorities. In particular, they shall not facilitate any violations of the principle of non-refoulement including for DDR participants and beneficiaries who may not qualify as refugees.", + "Paragraph": "Red lines \n DDR practitioners shall not facilitate any violations of international refugee law by national authorities. In particular, they shall not facilitate any violations of the principle of non-refoulement including for DDR participants and beneficiaries who may not qualify as refugees.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -19999,7 +19999,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 425, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware that it is the primary duty of States to prosecute those responsible for international crimes. \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of a parallel UN or national mandate, if any, for transitional justice in the State. \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of ongoing international and\/or national accountability and\/or transitional justice mechanisms or processes. \\n When planning for and conducting DDR processes, DDR practitioners should consult with UN human rights, accountability and\/or transitional justice advisers to ensure coordination, where such mechanisms or processes exist. \\n DDR practitioners should incorporate screening mechanisms and criteria into DDR processes for adults to identify suspected perpetrators of international crimes and exclude them from DDR processes. Suspected perpetrators should be reported to the competent national authorities. Legal advice should be sought, if possible, beforehand. \\n If the potential DDR participant is under 18 years old, DDR practitioners should refer to IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR for additional guidance.", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware that it is the primary duty of States to prosecute those responsible for international crimes. \n DDR practitioners should be aware of a parallel UN or national mandate, if any, for transitional justice in the State. \n DDR practitioners should be aware of ongoing international and\/or national accountability and\/or transitional justice mechanisms or processes. \n When planning for and conducting DDR processes, DDR practitioners should consult with UN human rights, accountability and\/or transitional justice advisers to ensure coordination, where such mechanisms or processes exist. \n DDR practitioners should incorporate screening mechanisms and criteria into DDR processes for adults to identify suspected perpetrators of international crimes and exclude them from DDR processes. Suspected perpetrators should be reported to the competent national authorities. Legal advice should be sought, if possible, beforehand. \n If the potential DDR participant is under 18 years old, DDR practitioners should refer to IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR for additional guidance.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20010,14 +20010,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.5 UN Security Council sanctions regimes", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware that it is the primary duty of States to prosecute those responsible for international crimes.", + "Sentence": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware that it is the primary duty of States to prosecute those responsible for international crimes.", "newParagraph": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner aware primary duty state prosecute responsible international crime n ddr practitioner aware parallel un national mandate transitional justice state n ddr practitioner aware ongoing international andor national accountability andor transitional justice mechanism process n planning conducting ddr process ddr practitioner consult un human right accountability andor transitional justice adviser ensure coordination mechanism process exist n ddr practitioner incorporate screening mechanism criterion ddr process adult identify suspected perpetrator international crime exclude ddr process suspected perpetrator reported competent national authority legal advice sought possible beforehand n potential ddr participant 18 year old ddr practitioner refer iddrs 520 child ddr iddrs 530 youth ddr additional guidance", "ProcessedSent": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner aware primary duty state prosecute responsible international crime", "SentID": 1111 }, { "ParagraphID": 425, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware that it is the primary duty of States to prosecute those responsible for international crimes. \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of a parallel UN or national mandate, if any, for transitional justice in the State. \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of ongoing international and\/or national accountability and\/or transitional justice mechanisms or processes. \\n When planning for and conducting DDR processes, DDR practitioners should consult with UN human rights, accountability and\/or transitional justice advisers to ensure coordination, where such mechanisms or processes exist. \\n DDR practitioners should incorporate screening mechanisms and criteria into DDR processes for adults to identify suspected perpetrators of international crimes and exclude them from DDR processes. Suspected perpetrators should be reported to the competent national authorities. Legal advice should be sought, if possible, beforehand. \\n If the potential DDR participant is under 18 years old, DDR practitioners should refer to IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR for additional guidance.", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware that it is the primary duty of States to prosecute those responsible for international crimes. \n DDR practitioners should be aware of a parallel UN or national mandate, if any, for transitional justice in the State. \n DDR practitioners should be aware of ongoing international and\/or national accountability and\/or transitional justice mechanisms or processes. \n When planning for and conducting DDR processes, DDR practitioners should consult with UN human rights, accountability and\/or transitional justice advisers to ensure coordination, where such mechanisms or processes exist. \n DDR practitioners should incorporate screening mechanisms and criteria into DDR processes for adults to identify suspected perpetrators of international crimes and exclude them from DDR processes. Suspected perpetrators should be reported to the competent national authorities. Legal advice should be sought, if possible, beforehand. \n If the potential DDR participant is under 18 years old, DDR practitioners should refer to IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR for additional guidance.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20028,14 +20028,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.5 UN Security Council sanctions regimes", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n DDR practitioners should be aware of a parallel UN or national mandate, if any, for transitional justice in the State.", + "Sentence": "\n DDR practitioners should be aware of a parallel UN or national mandate, if any, for transitional justice in the State.", "newParagraph": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner aware primary duty state prosecute responsible international crime n ddr practitioner aware parallel un national mandate transitional justice state n ddr practitioner aware ongoing international andor national accountability andor transitional justice mechanism process n planning conducting ddr process ddr practitioner consult un human right accountability andor transitional justice adviser ensure coordination mechanism process exist n ddr practitioner incorporate screening mechanism criterion ddr process adult identify suspected perpetrator international crime exclude ddr process suspected perpetrator reported competent national authority legal advice sought possible beforehand n potential ddr participant 18 year old ddr practitioner refer iddrs 520 child ddr iddrs 530 youth ddr additional guidance", "ProcessedSent": "n ddr practitioner aware parallel un national mandate transitional justice state", "SentID": 1112 }, { "ParagraphID": 425, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware that it is the primary duty of States to prosecute those responsible for international crimes. \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of a parallel UN or national mandate, if any, for transitional justice in the State. \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of ongoing international and\/or national accountability and\/or transitional justice mechanisms or processes. \\n When planning for and conducting DDR processes, DDR practitioners should consult with UN human rights, accountability and\/or transitional justice advisers to ensure coordination, where such mechanisms or processes exist. \\n DDR practitioners should incorporate screening mechanisms and criteria into DDR processes for adults to identify suspected perpetrators of international crimes and exclude them from DDR processes. Suspected perpetrators should be reported to the competent national authorities. Legal advice should be sought, if possible, beforehand. \\n If the potential DDR participant is under 18 years old, DDR practitioners should refer to IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR for additional guidance.", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware that it is the primary duty of States to prosecute those responsible for international crimes. \n DDR practitioners should be aware of a parallel UN or national mandate, if any, for transitional justice in the State. \n DDR practitioners should be aware of ongoing international and\/or national accountability and\/or transitional justice mechanisms or processes. \n When planning for and conducting DDR processes, DDR practitioners should consult with UN human rights, accountability and\/or transitional justice advisers to ensure coordination, where such mechanisms or processes exist. \n DDR practitioners should incorporate screening mechanisms and criteria into DDR processes for adults to identify suspected perpetrators of international crimes and exclude them from DDR processes. Suspected perpetrators should be reported to the competent national authorities. Legal advice should be sought, if possible, beforehand. \n If the potential DDR participant is under 18 years old, DDR practitioners should refer to IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR for additional guidance.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20046,14 +20046,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.5 UN Security Council sanctions regimes", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n DDR practitioners should be aware of ongoing international and\/or national accountability and\/or transitional justice mechanisms or processes.", + "Sentence": "\n DDR practitioners should be aware of ongoing international and\/or national accountability and\/or transitional justice mechanisms or processes.", "newParagraph": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner aware primary duty state prosecute responsible international crime n ddr practitioner aware parallel un national mandate transitional justice state n ddr practitioner aware ongoing international andor national accountability andor transitional justice mechanism process n planning conducting ddr process ddr practitioner consult un human right accountability andor transitional justice adviser ensure coordination mechanism process exist n ddr practitioner incorporate screening mechanism criterion ddr process adult identify suspected perpetrator international crime exclude ddr process suspected perpetrator reported competent national authority legal advice sought possible beforehand n potential ddr participant 18 year old ddr practitioner refer iddrs 520 child ddr iddrs 530 youth ddr additional guidance", "ProcessedSent": "n ddr practitioner aware ongoing international andor national accountability andor transitional justice mechanism process", "SentID": 1113 }, { "ParagraphID": 425, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware that it is the primary duty of States to prosecute those responsible for international crimes. \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of a parallel UN or national mandate, if any, for transitional justice in the State. \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of ongoing international and\/or national accountability and\/or transitional justice mechanisms or processes. \\n When planning for and conducting DDR processes, DDR practitioners should consult with UN human rights, accountability and\/or transitional justice advisers to ensure coordination, where such mechanisms or processes exist. \\n DDR practitioners should incorporate screening mechanisms and criteria into DDR processes for adults to identify suspected perpetrators of international crimes and exclude them from DDR processes. Suspected perpetrators should be reported to the competent national authorities. Legal advice should be sought, if possible, beforehand. \\n If the potential DDR participant is under 18 years old, DDR practitioners should refer to IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR for additional guidance.", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware that it is the primary duty of States to prosecute those responsible for international crimes. \n DDR practitioners should be aware of a parallel UN or national mandate, if any, for transitional justice in the State. \n DDR practitioners should be aware of ongoing international and\/or national accountability and\/or transitional justice mechanisms or processes. \n When planning for and conducting DDR processes, DDR practitioners should consult with UN human rights, accountability and\/or transitional justice advisers to ensure coordination, where such mechanisms or processes exist. \n DDR practitioners should incorporate screening mechanisms and criteria into DDR processes for adults to identify suspected perpetrators of international crimes and exclude them from DDR processes. Suspected perpetrators should be reported to the competent national authorities. Legal advice should be sought, if possible, beforehand. \n If the potential DDR participant is under 18 years old, DDR practitioners should refer to IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR for additional guidance.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20064,14 +20064,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.5 UN Security Council sanctions regimes", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n When planning for and conducting DDR processes, DDR practitioners should consult with UN human rights, accountability and\/or transitional justice advisers to ensure coordination, where such mechanisms or processes exist.", + "Sentence": "\n When planning for and conducting DDR processes, DDR practitioners should consult with UN human rights, accountability and\/or transitional justice advisers to ensure coordination, where such mechanisms or processes exist.", "newParagraph": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner aware primary duty state prosecute responsible international crime n ddr practitioner aware parallel un national mandate transitional justice state n ddr practitioner aware ongoing international andor national accountability andor transitional justice mechanism process n planning conducting ddr process ddr practitioner consult un human right accountability andor transitional justice adviser ensure coordination mechanism process exist n ddr practitioner incorporate screening mechanism criterion ddr process adult identify suspected perpetrator international crime exclude ddr process suspected perpetrator reported competent national authority legal advice sought possible beforehand n potential ddr participant 18 year old ddr practitioner refer iddrs 520 child ddr iddrs 530 youth ddr additional guidance", "ProcessedSent": "n planning conducting ddr process ddr practitioner consult un human right accountability andor transitional justice adviser ensure coordination mechanism process exist", "SentID": 1114 }, { "ParagraphID": 425, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware that it is the primary duty of States to prosecute those responsible for international crimes. \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of a parallel UN or national mandate, if any, for transitional justice in the State. \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of ongoing international and\/or national accountability and\/or transitional justice mechanisms or processes. \\n When planning for and conducting DDR processes, DDR practitioners should consult with UN human rights, accountability and\/or transitional justice advisers to ensure coordination, where such mechanisms or processes exist. \\n DDR practitioners should incorporate screening mechanisms and criteria into DDR processes for adults to identify suspected perpetrators of international crimes and exclude them from DDR processes. Suspected perpetrators should be reported to the competent national authorities. Legal advice should be sought, if possible, beforehand. \\n If the potential DDR participant is under 18 years old, DDR practitioners should refer to IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR for additional guidance.", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware that it is the primary duty of States to prosecute those responsible for international crimes. \n DDR practitioners should be aware of a parallel UN or national mandate, if any, for transitional justice in the State. \n DDR practitioners should be aware of ongoing international and\/or national accountability and\/or transitional justice mechanisms or processes. \n When planning for and conducting DDR processes, DDR practitioners should consult with UN human rights, accountability and\/or transitional justice advisers to ensure coordination, where such mechanisms or processes exist. \n DDR practitioners should incorporate screening mechanisms and criteria into DDR processes for adults to identify suspected perpetrators of international crimes and exclude them from DDR processes. Suspected perpetrators should be reported to the competent national authorities. Legal advice should be sought, if possible, beforehand. \n If the potential DDR participant is under 18 years old, DDR practitioners should refer to IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR for additional guidance.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20082,14 +20082,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.5 UN Security Council sanctions regimes", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n DDR practitioners should incorporate screening mechanisms and criteria into DDR processes for adults to identify suspected perpetrators of international crimes and exclude them from DDR processes.", + "Sentence": "\n DDR practitioners should incorporate screening mechanisms and criteria into DDR processes for adults to identify suspected perpetrators of international crimes and exclude them from DDR processes.", "newParagraph": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner aware primary duty state prosecute responsible international crime n ddr practitioner aware parallel un national mandate transitional justice state n ddr practitioner aware ongoing international andor national accountability andor transitional justice mechanism process n planning conducting ddr process ddr practitioner consult un human right accountability andor transitional justice adviser ensure coordination mechanism process exist n ddr practitioner incorporate screening mechanism criterion ddr process adult identify suspected perpetrator international crime exclude ddr process suspected perpetrator reported competent national authority legal advice sought possible beforehand n potential ddr participant 18 year old ddr practitioner refer iddrs 520 child ddr iddrs 530 youth ddr additional guidance", "ProcessedSent": "n ddr practitioner incorporate screening mechanism criterion ddr process adult identify suspected perpetrator international crime exclude ddr process", "SentID": 1115 }, { "ParagraphID": 425, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware that it is the primary duty of States to prosecute those responsible for international crimes. \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of a parallel UN or national mandate, if any, for transitional justice in the State. \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of ongoing international and\/or national accountability and\/or transitional justice mechanisms or processes. \\n When planning for and conducting DDR processes, DDR practitioners should consult with UN human rights, accountability and\/or transitional justice advisers to ensure coordination, where such mechanisms or processes exist. \\n DDR practitioners should incorporate screening mechanisms and criteria into DDR processes for adults to identify suspected perpetrators of international crimes and exclude them from DDR processes. Suspected perpetrators should be reported to the competent national authorities. Legal advice should be sought, if possible, beforehand. \\n If the potential DDR participant is under 18 years old, DDR practitioners should refer to IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR for additional guidance.", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware that it is the primary duty of States to prosecute those responsible for international crimes. \n DDR practitioners should be aware of a parallel UN or national mandate, if any, for transitional justice in the State. \n DDR practitioners should be aware of ongoing international and\/or national accountability and\/or transitional justice mechanisms or processes. \n When planning for and conducting DDR processes, DDR practitioners should consult with UN human rights, accountability and\/or transitional justice advisers to ensure coordination, where such mechanisms or processes exist. \n DDR practitioners should incorporate screening mechanisms and criteria into DDR processes for adults to identify suspected perpetrators of international crimes and exclude them from DDR processes. Suspected perpetrators should be reported to the competent national authorities. Legal advice should be sought, if possible, beforehand. \n If the potential DDR participant is under 18 years old, DDR practitioners should refer to IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR for additional guidance.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20107,7 +20107,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 425, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware that it is the primary duty of States to prosecute those responsible for international crimes. \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of a parallel UN or national mandate, if any, for transitional justice in the State. \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of ongoing international and\/or national accountability and\/or transitional justice mechanisms or processes. \\n When planning for and conducting DDR processes, DDR practitioners should consult with UN human rights, accountability and\/or transitional justice advisers to ensure coordination, where such mechanisms or processes exist. \\n DDR practitioners should incorporate screening mechanisms and criteria into DDR processes for adults to identify suspected perpetrators of international crimes and exclude them from DDR processes. Suspected perpetrators should be reported to the competent national authorities. Legal advice should be sought, if possible, beforehand. \\n If the potential DDR participant is under 18 years old, DDR practitioners should refer to IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR for additional guidance.", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware that it is the primary duty of States to prosecute those responsible for international crimes. \n DDR practitioners should be aware of a parallel UN or national mandate, if any, for transitional justice in the State. \n DDR practitioners should be aware of ongoing international and\/or national accountability and\/or transitional justice mechanisms or processes. \n When planning for and conducting DDR processes, DDR practitioners should consult with UN human rights, accountability and\/or transitional justice advisers to ensure coordination, where such mechanisms or processes exist. \n DDR practitioners should incorporate screening mechanisms and criteria into DDR processes for adults to identify suspected perpetrators of international crimes and exclude them from DDR processes. Suspected perpetrators should be reported to the competent national authorities. Legal advice should be sought, if possible, beforehand. \n If the potential DDR participant is under 18 years old, DDR practitioners should refer to IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR for additional guidance.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20125,7 +20125,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 425, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware that it is the primary duty of States to prosecute those responsible for international crimes. \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of a parallel UN or national mandate, if any, for transitional justice in the State. \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of ongoing international and\/or national accountability and\/or transitional justice mechanisms or processes. \\n When planning for and conducting DDR processes, DDR practitioners should consult with UN human rights, accountability and\/or transitional justice advisers to ensure coordination, where such mechanisms or processes exist. \\n DDR practitioners should incorporate screening mechanisms and criteria into DDR processes for adults to identify suspected perpetrators of international crimes and exclude them from DDR processes. Suspected perpetrators should be reported to the competent national authorities. Legal advice should be sought, if possible, beforehand. \\n If the potential DDR participant is under 18 years old, DDR practitioners should refer to IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR for additional guidance.", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware that it is the primary duty of States to prosecute those responsible for international crimes. \n DDR practitioners should be aware of a parallel UN or national mandate, if any, for transitional justice in the State. \n DDR practitioners should be aware of ongoing international and\/or national accountability and\/or transitional justice mechanisms or processes. \n When planning for and conducting DDR processes, DDR practitioners should consult with UN human rights, accountability and\/or transitional justice advisers to ensure coordination, where such mechanisms or processes exist. \n DDR practitioners should incorporate screening mechanisms and criteria into DDR processes for adults to identify suspected perpetrators of international crimes and exclude them from DDR processes. Suspected perpetrators should be reported to the competent national authorities. Legal advice should be sought, if possible, beforehand. \n If the potential DDR participant is under 18 years old, DDR practitioners should refer to IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR for additional guidance.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20136,7 +20136,7 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.5 UN Security Council sanctions regimes", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n If the potential DDR participant is under 18 years old, DDR practitioners should refer to IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR for additional guidance.", + "Sentence": "\n If the potential DDR participant is under 18 years old, DDR practitioners should refer to IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR for additional guidance.", "newParagraph": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner aware primary duty state prosecute responsible international crime n ddr practitioner aware parallel un national mandate transitional justice state n ddr practitioner aware ongoing international andor national accountability andor transitional justice mechanism process n planning conducting ddr process ddr practitioner consult un human right accountability andor transitional justice adviser ensure coordination mechanism process exist n ddr practitioner incorporate screening mechanism criterion ddr process adult identify suspected perpetrator international crime exclude ddr process suspected perpetrator reported competent national authority legal advice sought possible beforehand n potential ddr participant 18 year old ddr practitioner refer iddrs 520 child ddr iddrs 530 youth ddr additional guidance", "ProcessedSent": "n potential ddr participant 18 year old ddr practitioner refer iddrs 520 child ddr iddrs 530 youth ddr additional guidance", "SentID": 1118 @@ -20179,7 +20179,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 427, - "Paragraph": "Under the Security Council resolutions, Member States are required, among other things, to: \\n Ensure that any person who participates in the preparation or perpetration of terrorist acts or in supporting terrorist acts is brought to justice; \\n Ensure that such terrorist acts are established as serious criminal offences in domestic laws and regulations and that the punishment duly reflects the seriousness of such terrorist acts,19 including with respect to: \\n Financing, planning, preparation or perpetration of terrorist acts or support of these acts and \\n Offences related to the travel of foreign terrorist fighters.20", + "Paragraph": "Under the Security Council resolutions, Member States are required, among other things, to: \n Ensure that any person who participates in the preparation or perpetration of terrorist acts or in supporting terrorist acts is brought to justice; \n Ensure that such terrorist acts are established as serious criminal offences in domestic laws and regulations and that the punishment duly reflects the seriousness of such terrorist acts,19 including with respect to: \n Financing, planning, preparation or perpetration of terrorist acts or support of these acts and \n Offences related to the travel of foreign terrorist fighters.20", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20190,14 +20190,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.6 International counter-terrorism framework", "Heading4": "i. The requirement \u2018to bring terrorists to justice\u2019", - "Sentence": "Under the Security Council resolutions, Member States are required, among other things, to: \\n Ensure that any person who participates in the preparation or perpetration of terrorist acts or in supporting terrorist acts is brought to justice; \\n Ensure that such terrorist acts are established as serious criminal offences in domestic laws and regulations and that the punishment duly reflects the seriousness of such terrorist acts,19 including with respect to: \\n Financing, planning, preparation or perpetration of terrorist acts or support of these acts and \\n Offences related to the travel of foreign terrorist fighters.20", + "Sentence": "Under the Security Council resolutions, Member States are required, among other things, to: \n Ensure that any person who participates in the preparation or perpetration of terrorist acts or in supporting terrorist acts is brought to justice; \n Ensure that such terrorist acts are established as serious criminal offences in domestic laws and regulations and that the punishment duly reflects the seriousness of such terrorist acts,19 including with respect to: \n Financing, planning, preparation or perpetration of terrorist acts or support of these acts and \n Offences related to the travel of foreign terrorist fighters.20", "newParagraph": "security council resolution member state required among thing n ensure person participates preparation perpetration terrorist act supporting terrorist act brought justice n ensure terrorist act established serious criminal offence domestic law regulation punishment duly reflects seriousness terrorist acts19 including respect n financing planning preparation perpetration terrorist act support act n offence related travel foreign terrorist fighters20", "ProcessedSent": "security council resolution member state required among thing n ensure person participates preparation perpetration terrorist act supporting terrorist act brought justice n ensure terrorist act established serious criminal offence domestic law regulation punishment duly reflects seriousness terrorist acts19 including respect n financing planning preparation perpetration terrorist act support act n offence related travel foreign terrorist fighters20", "SentID": 1121 }, { "ParagraphID": 428, - "Paragraph": "Under the Security Council resolutions, Member States are also exhorted to establish criminal responsibility for: \\n Terrorist acts intended to destroy critical infrastructure21 and \\n Trafficking in persons by terrorist organizations and individuals.22", + "Paragraph": "Under the Security Council resolutions, Member States are also exhorted to establish criminal responsibility for: \n Terrorist acts intended to destroy critical infrastructure21 and \n Trafficking in persons by terrorist organizations and individuals.22", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20208,7 +20208,7 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.6 International counter-terrorism framework", "Heading4": "i. The requirement \u2018to bring terrorists to justice\u2019", - "Sentence": "Under the Security Council resolutions, Member States are also exhorted to establish criminal responsibility for: \\n Terrorist acts intended to destroy critical infrastructure21 and \\n Trafficking in persons by terrorist organizations and individuals.22", + "Sentence": "Under the Security Council resolutions, Member States are also exhorted to establish criminal responsibility for: \n Terrorist acts intended to destroy critical infrastructure21 and \n Trafficking in persons by terrorist organizations and individuals.22", "newParagraph": "security council resolution member state also exhorted establish criminal responsibility n terrorist act intended destroy critical infrastructure21 n trafficking person terrorist organization individuals22", "ProcessedSent": "security council resolution member state also exhorted establish criminal responsibility n terrorist act intended destroy critical infrastructure21 n trafficking person terrorist organization individuals22", "SentID": 1122 @@ -20233,7 +20233,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 430, - "Paragraph": "The Member State\u2019s obligation to \u2018bring terrorists to justice\u2019 is triggered and it shall consider whether a prosecution is warranted when there are reasonable grounds to believe that a group or individual has committed a terrorist offence set out in: \\n 1. A Security Council resolution or \\n 2. One of the 19 international counter-terrorism instruments to which a Member State is a party", + "Paragraph": "The Member State\u2019s obligation to \u2018bring terrorists to justice\u2019 is triggered and it shall consider whether a prosecution is warranted when there are reasonable grounds to believe that a group or individual has committed a terrorist offence set out in: \n 1. A Security Council resolution or \n 2. One of the 19 international counter-terrorism instruments to which a Member State is a party", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20244,14 +20244,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.6 International counter-terrorism framework", "Heading4": "i. The requirement \u2018to bring terrorists to justice\u2019", - "Sentence": "The Member State\u2019s obligation to \u2018bring terrorists to justice\u2019 is triggered and it shall consider whether a prosecution is warranted when there are reasonable grounds to believe that a group or individual has committed a terrorist offence set out in: \\n 1.", + "Sentence": "The Member State\u2019s obligation to \u2018bring terrorists to justice\u2019 is triggered and it shall consider whether a prosecution is warranted when there are reasonable grounds to believe that a group or individual has committed a terrorist offence set out in: \n 1.", "newParagraph": "member state obligation bring terrorist justice triggered shall consider whether prosecution warranted reasonable ground believe group individual committed terrorist offence set n 1 security council resolution n 2 one 19 international counterterrorism instrument member state party", "ProcessedSent": "member state obligation bring terrorist justice triggered shall consider whether prosecution warranted reasonable ground believe group individual committed terrorist offence set n 1", "SentID": 1124 }, { "ParagraphID": 430, - "Paragraph": "The Member State\u2019s obligation to \u2018bring terrorists to justice\u2019 is triggered and it shall consider whether a prosecution is warranted when there are reasonable grounds to believe that a group or individual has committed a terrorist offence set out in: \\n 1. A Security Council resolution or \\n 2. One of the 19 international counter-terrorism instruments to which a Member State is a party", + "Paragraph": "The Member State\u2019s obligation to \u2018bring terrorists to justice\u2019 is triggered and it shall consider whether a prosecution is warranted when there are reasonable grounds to believe that a group or individual has committed a terrorist offence set out in: \n 1. A Security Council resolution or \n 2. One of the 19 international counter-terrorism instruments to which a Member State is a party", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20262,14 +20262,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.6 International counter-terrorism framework", "Heading4": "i. The requirement \u2018to bring terrorists to justice\u2019", - "Sentence": "A Security Council resolution or \\n 2.", + "Sentence": "A Security Council resolution or \n 2.", "newParagraph": "member state obligation bring terrorist justice triggered shall consider whether prosecution warranted reasonable ground believe group individual committed terrorist offence set n 1 security council resolution n 2 one 19 international counterterrorism instrument member state party", "ProcessedSent": "security council resolution n 2", "SentID": 1125 }, { "ParagraphID": 430, - "Paragraph": "The Member State\u2019s obligation to \u2018bring terrorists to justice\u2019 is triggered and it shall consider whether a prosecution is warranted when there are reasonable grounds to believe that a group or individual has committed a terrorist offence set out in: \\n 1. A Security Council resolution or \\n 2. One of the 19 international counter-terrorism instruments to which a Member State is a party", + "Paragraph": "The Member State\u2019s obligation to \u2018bring terrorists to justice\u2019 is triggered and it shall consider whether a prosecution is warranted when there are reasonable grounds to believe that a group or individual has committed a terrorist offence set out in: \n 1. A Security Council resolution or \n 2. One of the 19 international counter-terrorism instruments to which a Member State is a party", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20305,7 +20305,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 432, - "Paragraph": "Of particular relevance to the DDR practitioner is the fact that under Security Council resolutions, with respect to suspected terrorists (as defined above), Member States are further called upon to: \\n Develop and implement comprehensive and tailored prosecution, rehabilitation, and reintegration strategies and protocols, in line with their obligations under international law, including with respect to returning and relocating foreign terrorist fighters and their spouses and children who accompany them, and to address their suitability for rehabilitation.24", + "Paragraph": "Of particular relevance to the DDR practitioner is the fact that under Security Council resolutions, with respect to suspected terrorists (as defined above), Member States are further called upon to: \n Develop and implement comprehensive and tailored prosecution, rehabilitation, and reintegration strategies and protocols, in line with their obligations under international law, including with respect to returning and relocating foreign terrorist fighters and their spouses and children who accompany them, and to address their suitability for rehabilitation.24", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20316,14 +20316,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.6 International counter-terrorism framework", "Heading4": "i. The requirement \u2018to bring terrorists to justice\u2019", - "Sentence": "Of particular relevance to the DDR practitioner is the fact that under Security Council resolutions, with respect to suspected terrorists (as defined above), Member States are further called upon to: \\n Develop and implement comprehensive and tailored prosecution, rehabilitation, and reintegration strategies and protocols, in line with their obligations under international law, including with respect to returning and relocating foreign terrorist fighters and their spouses and children who accompany them, and to address their suitability for rehabilitation.24", + "Sentence": "Of particular relevance to the DDR practitioner is the fact that under Security Council resolutions, with respect to suspected terrorists (as defined above), Member States are further called upon to: \n Develop and implement comprehensive and tailored prosecution, rehabilitation, and reintegration strategies and protocols, in line with their obligations under international law, including with respect to returning and relocating foreign terrorist fighters and their spouses and children who accompany them, and to address their suitability for rehabilitation.24", "newParagraph": "particular relevance ddr practitioner fact security council resolution respect suspected terrorist defined member state called upon n develop implement comprehensive tailored prosecution rehabilitation reintegration strategy protocol line obligation international law including respect returning relocating foreign terrorist fighter spouse child accompany address suitability rehabilitation24", "ProcessedSent": "particular relevance ddr practitioner fact security council resolution respect suspected terrorist defined member state called upon n develop implement comprehensive tailored prosecution rehabilitation reintegration strategy protocol line obligation international law including respect returning relocating foreign terrorist fighter spouse child accompany address suitability rehabilitation24", "SentID": 1128 }, { "ParagraphID": 433, - "Paragraph": "There are two main scenarios where DDR processes and the international counter-terrorism legal framework may intersect: \\n 1. In addition to the traditional concerns with regard to screening out for prosecution persons suspected of war crimes, crimes against humanity or genocide, the DDR practitioner, in advising and assisting a Member State, should also be aware of the Member State\u2019s obligations under the international counter-terrorism legal framework, and remind them of those obligations, if need be. Specific criteria, as appropriate and applicable to the context and Member States, should be incorporated into screening for DDR processes to identify and disqualify persons who have committed or are reasonably believed to have committed a terrorist act, or who are identified as clearly associated with a Security Council-designated terrorist organization. \\n 2. Although DDR programmes are not appropriate for persons associated with such organizations (see section below), lessons learned and programming experience from DDR programmes may be very relevant to the design, implementation and support to programmes to prosecute, rehabilitate and reintegrate these persons.", + "Paragraph": "There are two main scenarios where DDR processes and the international counter-terrorism legal framework may intersect: \n 1. In addition to the traditional concerns with regard to screening out for prosecution persons suspected of war crimes, crimes against humanity or genocide, the DDR practitioner, in advising and assisting a Member State, should also be aware of the Member State\u2019s obligations under the international counter-terrorism legal framework, and remind them of those obligations, if need be. Specific criteria, as appropriate and applicable to the context and Member States, should be incorporated into screening for DDR processes to identify and disqualify persons who have committed or are reasonably believed to have committed a terrorist act, or who are identified as clearly associated with a Security Council-designated terrorist organization. \n 2. Although DDR programmes are not appropriate for persons associated with such organizations (see section below), lessons learned and programming experience from DDR programmes may be very relevant to the design, implementation and support to programmes to prosecute, rehabilitate and reintegrate these persons.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20334,14 +20334,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.6 International counter-terrorism framework", "Heading4": "i. The requirement \u2018to bring terrorists to justice\u2019", - "Sentence": "There are two main scenarios where DDR processes and the international counter-terrorism legal framework may intersect: \\n 1.", + "Sentence": "There are two main scenarios where DDR processes and the international counter-terrorism legal framework may intersect: \n 1.", "newParagraph": "two main scenario ddr process international counterterrorism legal framework may intersect n 1 addition traditional concern regard screening prosecution person suspected war crime crime humanity genocide ddr practitioner advising assisting member state also aware member state obligation international counterterrorism legal framework remind obligation need specific criterion appropriate applicable context member state incorporated screening ddr process identify disqualify person committed reasonably believed committed terrorist act identified clearly associated security councildesignated terrorist organization n 2 although ddr programme appropriate person associated organization see section lesson learned programming experience ddr programme may relevant design implementation support programme prosecute rehabilitate reintegrate person", "ProcessedSent": "two main scenario ddr process international counterterrorism legal framework may intersect n 1", "SentID": 1129 }, { "ParagraphID": 433, - "Paragraph": "There are two main scenarios where DDR processes and the international counter-terrorism legal framework may intersect: \\n 1. In addition to the traditional concerns with regard to screening out for prosecution persons suspected of war crimes, crimes against humanity or genocide, the DDR practitioner, in advising and assisting a Member State, should also be aware of the Member State\u2019s obligations under the international counter-terrorism legal framework, and remind them of those obligations, if need be. Specific criteria, as appropriate and applicable to the context and Member States, should be incorporated into screening for DDR processes to identify and disqualify persons who have committed or are reasonably believed to have committed a terrorist act, or who are identified as clearly associated with a Security Council-designated terrorist organization. \\n 2. Although DDR programmes are not appropriate for persons associated with such organizations (see section below), lessons learned and programming experience from DDR programmes may be very relevant to the design, implementation and support to programmes to prosecute, rehabilitate and reintegrate these persons.", + "Paragraph": "There are two main scenarios where DDR processes and the international counter-terrorism legal framework may intersect: \n 1. In addition to the traditional concerns with regard to screening out for prosecution persons suspected of war crimes, crimes against humanity or genocide, the DDR practitioner, in advising and assisting a Member State, should also be aware of the Member State\u2019s obligations under the international counter-terrorism legal framework, and remind them of those obligations, if need be. Specific criteria, as appropriate and applicable to the context and Member States, should be incorporated into screening for DDR processes to identify and disqualify persons who have committed or are reasonably believed to have committed a terrorist act, or who are identified as clearly associated with a Security Council-designated terrorist organization. \n 2. Although DDR programmes are not appropriate for persons associated with such organizations (see section below), lessons learned and programming experience from DDR programmes may be very relevant to the design, implementation and support to programmes to prosecute, rehabilitate and reintegrate these persons.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20359,7 +20359,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 433, - "Paragraph": "There are two main scenarios where DDR processes and the international counter-terrorism legal framework may intersect: \\n 1. In addition to the traditional concerns with regard to screening out for prosecution persons suspected of war crimes, crimes against humanity or genocide, the DDR practitioner, in advising and assisting a Member State, should also be aware of the Member State\u2019s obligations under the international counter-terrorism legal framework, and remind them of those obligations, if need be. Specific criteria, as appropriate and applicable to the context and Member States, should be incorporated into screening for DDR processes to identify and disqualify persons who have committed or are reasonably believed to have committed a terrorist act, or who are identified as clearly associated with a Security Council-designated terrorist organization. \\n 2. Although DDR programmes are not appropriate for persons associated with such organizations (see section below), lessons learned and programming experience from DDR programmes may be very relevant to the design, implementation and support to programmes to prosecute, rehabilitate and reintegrate these persons.", + "Paragraph": "There are two main scenarios where DDR processes and the international counter-terrorism legal framework may intersect: \n 1. In addition to the traditional concerns with regard to screening out for prosecution persons suspected of war crimes, crimes against humanity or genocide, the DDR practitioner, in advising and assisting a Member State, should also be aware of the Member State\u2019s obligations under the international counter-terrorism legal framework, and remind them of those obligations, if need be. Specific criteria, as appropriate and applicable to the context and Member States, should be incorporated into screening for DDR processes to identify and disqualify persons who have committed or are reasonably believed to have committed a terrorist act, or who are identified as clearly associated with a Security Council-designated terrorist organization. \n 2. Although DDR programmes are not appropriate for persons associated with such organizations (see section below), lessons learned and programming experience from DDR programmes may be very relevant to the design, implementation and support to programmes to prosecute, rehabilitate and reintegrate these persons.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20377,7 +20377,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 433, - "Paragraph": "There are two main scenarios where DDR processes and the international counter-terrorism legal framework may intersect: \\n 1. In addition to the traditional concerns with regard to screening out for prosecution persons suspected of war crimes, crimes against humanity or genocide, the DDR practitioner, in advising and assisting a Member State, should also be aware of the Member State\u2019s obligations under the international counter-terrorism legal framework, and remind them of those obligations, if need be. Specific criteria, as appropriate and applicable to the context and Member States, should be incorporated into screening for DDR processes to identify and disqualify persons who have committed or are reasonably believed to have committed a terrorist act, or who are identified as clearly associated with a Security Council-designated terrorist organization. \\n 2. Although DDR programmes are not appropriate for persons associated with such organizations (see section below), lessons learned and programming experience from DDR programmes may be very relevant to the design, implementation and support to programmes to prosecute, rehabilitate and reintegrate these persons.", + "Paragraph": "There are two main scenarios where DDR processes and the international counter-terrorism legal framework may intersect: \n 1. In addition to the traditional concerns with regard to screening out for prosecution persons suspected of war crimes, crimes against humanity or genocide, the DDR practitioner, in advising and assisting a Member State, should also be aware of the Member State\u2019s obligations under the international counter-terrorism legal framework, and remind them of those obligations, if need be. Specific criteria, as appropriate and applicable to the context and Member States, should be incorporated into screening for DDR processes to identify and disqualify persons who have committed or are reasonably believed to have committed a terrorist act, or who are identified as clearly associated with a Security Council-designated terrorist organization. \n 2. Although DDR programmes are not appropriate for persons associated with such organizations (see section below), lessons learned and programming experience from DDR programmes may be very relevant to the design, implementation and support to programmes to prosecute, rehabilitate and reintegrate these persons.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20388,14 +20388,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.6 International counter-terrorism framework", "Heading4": "i. The requirement \u2018to bring terrorists to justice\u2019", - "Sentence": "\\n 2.", + "Sentence": "\n 2.", "newParagraph": "two main scenario ddr process international counterterrorism legal framework may intersect n 1 addition traditional concern regard screening prosecution person suspected war crime crime humanity genocide ddr practitioner advising assisting member state also aware member state obligation international counterterrorism legal framework remind obligation need specific criterion appropriate applicable context member state incorporated screening ddr process identify disqualify person committed reasonably believed committed terrorist act identified clearly associated security councildesignated terrorist organization n 2 although ddr programme appropriate person associated organization see section lesson learned programming experience ddr programme may relevant design implementation support programme prosecute rehabilitate reintegrate person", "ProcessedSent": "n 2", "SentID": 1132 }, { "ParagraphID": 433, - "Paragraph": "There are two main scenarios where DDR processes and the international counter-terrorism legal framework may intersect: \\n 1. In addition to the traditional concerns with regard to screening out for prosecution persons suspected of war crimes, crimes against humanity or genocide, the DDR practitioner, in advising and assisting a Member State, should also be aware of the Member State\u2019s obligations under the international counter-terrorism legal framework, and remind them of those obligations, if need be. Specific criteria, as appropriate and applicable to the context and Member States, should be incorporated into screening for DDR processes to identify and disqualify persons who have committed or are reasonably believed to have committed a terrorist act, or who are identified as clearly associated with a Security Council-designated terrorist organization. \\n 2. Although DDR programmes are not appropriate for persons associated with such organizations (see section below), lessons learned and programming experience from DDR programmes may be very relevant to the design, implementation and support to programmes to prosecute, rehabilitate and reintegrate these persons.", + "Paragraph": "There are two main scenarios where DDR processes and the international counter-terrorism legal framework may intersect: \n 1. In addition to the traditional concerns with regard to screening out for prosecution persons suspected of war crimes, crimes against humanity or genocide, the DDR practitioner, in advising and assisting a Member State, should also be aware of the Member State\u2019s obligations under the international counter-terrorism legal framework, and remind them of those obligations, if need be. Specific criteria, as appropriate and applicable to the context and Member States, should be incorporated into screening for DDR processes to identify and disqualify persons who have committed or are reasonably believed to have committed a terrorist act, or who are identified as clearly associated with a Security Council-designated terrorist organization. \n 2. Although DDR programmes are not appropriate for persons associated with such organizations (see section below), lessons learned and programming experience from DDR programmes may be very relevant to the design, implementation and support to programmes to prosecute, rehabilitate and reintegrate these persons.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20539,7 +20539,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 437, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware that the host State has legal obligations under Security Council resolutions and\/or international counter-terrorism instruments to ensure that terrorists are brought to justice. \\n DDR practitioners shall incorporate proper screening mechanisms and criteria into DDR processes to identify suspected terrorists. \\n Depending on the circumstances, the terrorist organization they are associated with and the terrorist offences committed, it may not be appropriate for suspected terrorists to participate in DDR processes. Children associated with such groups should be treated in accordance with the standards set out in IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR.", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware that the host State has legal obligations under Security Council resolutions and\/or international counter-terrorism instruments to ensure that terrorists are brought to justice. \n DDR practitioners shall incorporate proper screening mechanisms and criteria into DDR processes to identify suspected terrorists. \n Depending on the circumstances, the terrorist organization they are associated with and the terrorist offences committed, it may not be appropriate for suspected terrorists to participate in DDR processes. Children associated with such groups should be treated in accordance with the standards set out in IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20550,14 +20550,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.6 International counter-terrorism framework", "Heading4": "i. The requirement \u2018to bring terrorists to justice\u2019", - "Sentence": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware that the host State has legal obligations under Security Council resolutions and\/or international counter-terrorism instruments to ensure that terrorists are brought to justice.", + "Sentence": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware that the host State has legal obligations under Security Council resolutions and\/or international counter-terrorism instruments to ensure that terrorists are brought to justice.", "newParagraph": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner aware host state legal obligation security council resolution andor international counterterrorism instrument ensure terrorist brought justice n ddr practitioner shall incorporate proper screening mechanism criterion ddr process identify suspected terrorist n depending circumstance terrorist organization associated terrorist offence committed may appropriate suspected terrorist participate ddr process child associated group treated accordance standard set iddrs 520 child ddr iddrs 530 youth ddr", "ProcessedSent": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner aware host state legal obligation security council resolution andor international counterterrorism instrument ensure terrorist brought justice", "SentID": 1141 }, { "ParagraphID": 437, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware that the host State has legal obligations under Security Council resolutions and\/or international counter-terrorism instruments to ensure that terrorists are brought to justice. \\n DDR practitioners shall incorporate proper screening mechanisms and criteria into DDR processes to identify suspected terrorists. \\n Depending on the circumstances, the terrorist organization they are associated with and the terrorist offences committed, it may not be appropriate for suspected terrorists to participate in DDR processes. Children associated with such groups should be treated in accordance with the standards set out in IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR.", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware that the host State has legal obligations under Security Council resolutions and\/or international counter-terrorism instruments to ensure that terrorists are brought to justice. \n DDR practitioners shall incorporate proper screening mechanisms and criteria into DDR processes to identify suspected terrorists. \n Depending on the circumstances, the terrorist organization they are associated with and the terrorist offences committed, it may not be appropriate for suspected terrorists to participate in DDR processes. Children associated with such groups should be treated in accordance with the standards set out in IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20568,14 +20568,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.6 International counter-terrorism framework", "Heading4": "i. The requirement \u2018to bring terrorists to justice\u2019", - "Sentence": "\\n DDR practitioners shall incorporate proper screening mechanisms and criteria into DDR processes to identify suspected terrorists.", + "Sentence": "\n DDR practitioners shall incorporate proper screening mechanisms and criteria into DDR processes to identify suspected terrorists.", "newParagraph": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner aware host state legal obligation security council resolution andor international counterterrorism instrument ensure terrorist brought justice n ddr practitioner shall incorporate proper screening mechanism criterion ddr process identify suspected terrorist n depending circumstance terrorist organization associated terrorist offence committed may appropriate suspected terrorist participate ddr process child associated group treated accordance standard set iddrs 520 child ddr iddrs 530 youth ddr", "ProcessedSent": "n ddr practitioner shall incorporate proper screening mechanism criterion ddr process identify suspected terrorist", "SentID": 1142 }, { "ParagraphID": 437, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware that the host State has legal obligations under Security Council resolutions and\/or international counter-terrorism instruments to ensure that terrorists are brought to justice. \\n DDR practitioners shall incorporate proper screening mechanisms and criteria into DDR processes to identify suspected terrorists. \\n Depending on the circumstances, the terrorist organization they are associated with and the terrorist offences committed, it may not be appropriate for suspected terrorists to participate in DDR processes. Children associated with such groups should be treated in accordance with the standards set out in IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR.", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware that the host State has legal obligations under Security Council resolutions and\/or international counter-terrorism instruments to ensure that terrorists are brought to justice. \n DDR practitioners shall incorporate proper screening mechanisms and criteria into DDR processes to identify suspected terrorists. \n Depending on the circumstances, the terrorist organization they are associated with and the terrorist offences committed, it may not be appropriate for suspected terrorists to participate in DDR processes. Children associated with such groups should be treated in accordance with the standards set out in IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20586,14 +20586,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.6 International counter-terrorism framework", "Heading4": "i. The requirement \u2018to bring terrorists to justice\u2019", - "Sentence": "\\n Depending on the circumstances, the terrorist organization they are associated with and the terrorist offences committed, it may not be appropriate for suspected terrorists to participate in DDR processes.", + "Sentence": "\n Depending on the circumstances, the terrorist organization they are associated with and the terrorist offences committed, it may not be appropriate for suspected terrorists to participate in DDR processes.", "newParagraph": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner aware host state legal obligation security council resolution andor international counterterrorism instrument ensure terrorist brought justice n ddr practitioner shall incorporate proper screening mechanism criterion ddr process identify suspected terrorist n depending circumstance terrorist organization associated terrorist offence committed may appropriate suspected terrorist participate ddr process child associated group treated accordance standard set iddrs 520 child ddr iddrs 530 youth ddr", "ProcessedSent": "n depending circumstance terrorist organization associated terrorist offence committed may appropriate suspected terrorist participate ddr process", "SentID": 1143 }, { "ParagraphID": 437, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware that the host State has legal obligations under Security Council resolutions and\/or international counter-terrorism instruments to ensure that terrorists are brought to justice. \\n DDR practitioners shall incorporate proper screening mechanisms and criteria into DDR processes to identify suspected terrorists. \\n Depending on the circumstances, the terrorist organization they are associated with and the terrorist offences committed, it may not be appropriate for suspected terrorists to participate in DDR processes. Children associated with such groups should be treated in accordance with the standards set out in IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR.", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware that the host State has legal obligations under Security Council resolutions and\/or international counter-terrorism instruments to ensure that terrorists are brought to justice. \n DDR practitioners shall incorporate proper screening mechanisms and criteria into DDR processes to identify suspected terrorists. \n Depending on the circumstances, the terrorist organization they are associated with and the terrorist offences committed, it may not be appropriate for suspected terrorists to participate in DDR processes. Children associated with such groups should be treated in accordance with the standards set out in IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20737,7 +20737,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 442, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of whether or not a group, entity or individual has been listed by the Security Council Committee pursuant to resolutions 1267 (1999), 1989 (2011) and 2253 (2015) and should consult their legal adviser on the implications this may have for planning or implementation of DDR processes. \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of whether or not a group, entity or individual has been designated a terrorist organization or individual by a regional organization or Member State (including the host State or donor country) and should consult their legal adviser on the implications this may have on the planning and implementation of DDR processes. \\n DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser upon applicable host State national legislation targeting the provision of support to listed terrorist groups, including its possible criminalization.", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware of whether or not a group, entity or individual has been listed by the Security Council Committee pursuant to resolutions 1267 (1999), 1989 (2011) and 2253 (2015) and should consult their legal adviser on the implications this may have for planning or implementation of DDR processes. \n DDR practitioners should be aware of whether or not a group, entity or individual has been designated a terrorist organization or individual by a regional organization or Member State (including the host State or donor country) and should consult their legal adviser on the implications this may have on the planning and implementation of DDR processes. \n DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser upon applicable host State national legislation targeting the provision of support to listed terrorist groups, including its possible criminalization.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20748,14 +20748,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.6 International counter-terrorism framework", "Heading4": "ii. Sanctions relating to terrorism, including from Security Council committees ", - "Sentence": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of whether or not a group, entity or individual has been listed by the Security Council Committee pursuant to resolutions 1267 (1999), 1989 (2011) and 2253 (2015) and should consult their legal adviser on the implications this may have for planning or implementation of DDR processes.", + "Sentence": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware of whether or not a group, entity or individual has been listed by the Security Council Committee pursuant to resolutions 1267 (1999), 1989 (2011) and 2253 (2015) and should consult their legal adviser on the implications this may have for planning or implementation of DDR processes.", "newParagraph": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner aware whether group entity individual listed security council committee pursuant resolution 1267 1999 1989 2011 2253 2015 consult legal adviser implication may planning implementation ddr process n ddr practitioner aware whether group entity individual designated terrorist organization individual regional organization member state including host state donor country consult legal adviser implication may planning implementation ddr process n ddr practitioner consult legal adviser upon applicable host state national legislation targeting provision support listed terrorist group including possible criminalization", "ProcessedSent": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner aware whether group entity individual listed security council committee pursuant resolution 1267 1999 1989 2011 2253 2015 consult legal adviser implication may planning implementation ddr process", "SentID": 1152 }, { "ParagraphID": 442, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of whether or not a group, entity or individual has been listed by the Security Council Committee pursuant to resolutions 1267 (1999), 1989 (2011) and 2253 (2015) and should consult their legal adviser on the implications this may have for planning or implementation of DDR processes. \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of whether or not a group, entity or individual has been designated a terrorist organization or individual by a regional organization or Member State (including the host State or donor country) and should consult their legal adviser on the implications this may have on the planning and implementation of DDR processes. \\n DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser upon applicable host State national legislation targeting the provision of support to listed terrorist groups, including its possible criminalization.", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware of whether or not a group, entity or individual has been listed by the Security Council Committee pursuant to resolutions 1267 (1999), 1989 (2011) and 2253 (2015) and should consult their legal adviser on the implications this may have for planning or implementation of DDR processes. \n DDR practitioners should be aware of whether or not a group, entity or individual has been designated a terrorist organization or individual by a regional organization or Member State (including the host State or donor country) and should consult their legal adviser on the implications this may have on the planning and implementation of DDR processes. \n DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser upon applicable host State national legislation targeting the provision of support to listed terrorist groups, including its possible criminalization.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20766,14 +20766,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.6 International counter-terrorism framework", "Heading4": "ii. Sanctions relating to terrorism, including from Security Council committees ", - "Sentence": "\\n DDR practitioners should be aware of whether or not a group, entity or individual has been designated a terrorist organization or individual by a regional organization or Member State (including the host State or donor country) and should consult their legal adviser on the implications this may have on the planning and implementation of DDR processes.", + "Sentence": "\n DDR practitioners should be aware of whether or not a group, entity or individual has been designated a terrorist organization or individual by a regional organization or Member State (including the host State or donor country) and should consult their legal adviser on the implications this may have on the planning and implementation of DDR processes.", "newParagraph": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner aware whether group entity individual listed security council committee pursuant resolution 1267 1999 1989 2011 2253 2015 consult legal adviser implication may planning implementation ddr process n ddr practitioner aware whether group entity individual designated terrorist organization individual regional organization member state including host state donor country consult legal adviser implication may planning implementation ddr process n ddr practitioner consult legal adviser upon applicable host state national legislation targeting provision support listed terrorist group including possible criminalization", "ProcessedSent": "n ddr practitioner aware whether group entity individual designated terrorist organization individual regional organization member state including host state donor country consult legal adviser implication may planning implementation ddr process", "SentID": 1153 }, { "ParagraphID": 442, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of whether or not a group, entity or individual has been listed by the Security Council Committee pursuant to resolutions 1267 (1999), 1989 (2011) and 2253 (2015) and should consult their legal adviser on the implications this may have for planning or implementation of DDR processes. \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of whether or not a group, entity or individual has been designated a terrorist organization or individual by a regional organization or Member State (including the host State or donor country) and should consult their legal adviser on the implications this may have on the planning and implementation of DDR processes. \\n DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser upon applicable host State national legislation targeting the provision of support to listed terrorist groups, including its possible criminalization.", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware of whether or not a group, entity or individual has been listed by the Security Council Committee pursuant to resolutions 1267 (1999), 1989 (2011) and 2253 (2015) and should consult their legal adviser on the implications this may have for planning or implementation of DDR processes. \n DDR practitioners should be aware of whether or not a group, entity or individual has been designated a terrorist organization or individual by a regional organization or Member State (including the host State or donor country) and should consult their legal adviser on the implications this may have on the planning and implementation of DDR processes. \n DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser upon applicable host State national legislation targeting the provision of support to listed terrorist groups, including its possible criminalization.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20784,14 +20784,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.6 International counter-terrorism framework", "Heading4": "ii. Sanctions relating to terrorism, including from Security Council committees ", - "Sentence": "\\n DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser upon applicable host State national legislation targeting the provision of support to listed terrorist groups, including its possible criminalization.", + "Sentence": "\n DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser upon applicable host State national legislation targeting the provision of support to listed terrorist groups, including its possible criminalization.", "newParagraph": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner aware whether group entity individual listed security council committee pursuant resolution 1267 1999 1989 2011 2253 2015 consult legal adviser implication may planning implementation ddr process n ddr practitioner aware whether group entity individual designated terrorist organization individual regional organization member state including host state donor country consult legal adviser implication may planning implementation ddr process n ddr practitioner consult legal adviser upon applicable host state national legislation targeting provision support listed terrorist group including possible criminalization", "ProcessedSent": "n ddr practitioner consult legal adviser upon applicable host state national legislation targeting provision support listed terrorist group including possible criminalization", "SentID": 1154 }, { "ParagraphID": 443, - "Paragraph": "Red line \\n Groups or individuals listed by the Security Council, as well as perpetrators or suspected perpetrators of terrorist acts cannot be participants in DDR programmes. However, in compliance with relevant international standards and within the proper framework, support may be provided by DDR practitioners, using DDR-related tools, to persons associated to Security Council\u2013designated terrorist organizations.", + "Paragraph": "Red line \n Groups or individuals listed by the Security Council, as well as perpetrators or suspected perpetrators of terrorist acts cannot be participants in DDR programmes. However, in compliance with relevant international standards and within the proper framework, support may be provided by DDR practitioners, using DDR-related tools, to persons associated to Security Council\u2013designated terrorist organizations.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20802,14 +20802,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.6 International counter-terrorism framework", "Heading4": "ii. Sanctions relating to terrorism, including from Security Council committees ", - "Sentence": "Red line \\n Groups or individuals listed by the Security Council, as well as perpetrators or suspected perpetrators of terrorist acts cannot be participants in DDR programmes.", + "Sentence": "Red line \n Groups or individuals listed by the Security Council, as well as perpetrators or suspected perpetrators of terrorist acts cannot be participants in DDR programmes.", "newParagraph": "red line n group individual listed security council well perpetrator suspected perpetrator terrorist act cannot participant ddr programme however compliance relevant international standard within proper framework support may provided ddr practitioner using ddrrelated tool person associated security council designated terrorist organization", "ProcessedSent": "red line n group individual listed security council well perpetrator suspected perpetrator terrorist act cannot participant ddr programme", "SentID": 1155 }, { "ParagraphID": 443, - "Paragraph": "Red line \\n Groups or individuals listed by the Security Council, as well as perpetrators or suspected perpetrators of terrorist acts cannot be participants in DDR programmes. However, in compliance with relevant international standards and within the proper framework, support may be provided by DDR practitioners, using DDR-related tools, to persons associated to Security Council\u2013designated terrorist organizations.", + "Paragraph": "Red line \n Groups or individuals listed by the Security Council, as well as perpetrators or suspected perpetrators of terrorist acts cannot be participants in DDR programmes. However, in compliance with relevant international standards and within the proper framework, support may be provided by DDR practitioners, using DDR-related tools, to persons associated to Security Council\u2013designated terrorist organizations.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20827,7 +20827,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 444, - "Paragraph": "The international arms control framework is made up of a number of international legal instruments that set out obligations for Member States with regard to a range of arms control issues relevant to DDR activities, including the management, storage, security, transfer and disposal of arms, ammunition and related material. These instruments include: \\n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts and Components and Ammunition, supplementing the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, is the only legally binding instrument at the global level to counter the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. It provides a framework for States to control and regulate licit arms and arms flows, prevent their diversion into illegal circulation, and facilitate the investigation and prosecution of related offences without hampering legitimate transfers. \\n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international trade in conventional arms, ranging from small arms to battle tanks, combat aircraft and warships. \\n The Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects as amended on 21 December 2001 bans or restricts the use of specific types of weapons that are considered to cause unnecessary or unjustifiable suffering to combatants or to affect civilians indiscriminately. \\n The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction prohibits the development, production, stockpiling, transfer and use of anti-personnel mines. \\n The Convention on Cluster Munitions prohibits all use, production, transfer and stockpiling of cluster munitions. It also establishes a framework for cooperation and assistance to ensure adequate support to survivors and their communities, clearance of contaminated areas, risk reduction education and destruction of stockpiles.", + "Paragraph": "The international arms control framework is made up of a number of international legal instruments that set out obligations for Member States with regard to a range of arms control issues relevant to DDR activities, including the management, storage, security, transfer and disposal of arms, ammunition and related material. These instruments include: \n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts and Components and Ammunition, supplementing the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, is the only legally binding instrument at the global level to counter the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. It provides a framework for States to control and regulate licit arms and arms flows, prevent their diversion into illegal circulation, and facilitate the investigation and prosecution of related offences without hampering legitimate transfers. \n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international trade in conventional arms, ranging from small arms to battle tanks, combat aircraft and warships. \n The Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects as amended on 21 December 2001 bans or restricts the use of specific types of weapons that are considered to cause unnecessary or unjustifiable suffering to combatants or to affect civilians indiscriminately. \n The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction prohibits the development, production, stockpiling, transfer and use of anti-personnel mines. \n The Convention on Cluster Munitions prohibits all use, production, transfer and stockpiling of cluster munitions. It also establishes a framework for cooperation and assistance to ensure adequate support to survivors and their communities, clearance of contaminated areas, risk reduction education and destruction of stockpiles.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20845,7 +20845,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 444, - "Paragraph": "The international arms control framework is made up of a number of international legal instruments that set out obligations for Member States with regard to a range of arms control issues relevant to DDR activities, including the management, storage, security, transfer and disposal of arms, ammunition and related material. These instruments include: \\n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts and Components and Ammunition, supplementing the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, is the only legally binding instrument at the global level to counter the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. It provides a framework for States to control and regulate licit arms and arms flows, prevent their diversion into illegal circulation, and facilitate the investigation and prosecution of related offences without hampering legitimate transfers. \\n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international trade in conventional arms, ranging from small arms to battle tanks, combat aircraft and warships. \\n The Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects as amended on 21 December 2001 bans or restricts the use of specific types of weapons that are considered to cause unnecessary or unjustifiable suffering to combatants or to affect civilians indiscriminately. \\n The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction prohibits the development, production, stockpiling, transfer and use of anti-personnel mines. \\n The Convention on Cluster Munitions prohibits all use, production, transfer and stockpiling of cluster munitions. It also establishes a framework for cooperation and assistance to ensure adequate support to survivors and their communities, clearance of contaminated areas, risk reduction education and destruction of stockpiles.", + "Paragraph": "The international arms control framework is made up of a number of international legal instruments that set out obligations for Member States with regard to a range of arms control issues relevant to DDR activities, including the management, storage, security, transfer and disposal of arms, ammunition and related material. These instruments include: \n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts and Components and Ammunition, supplementing the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, is the only legally binding instrument at the global level to counter the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. It provides a framework for States to control and regulate licit arms and arms flows, prevent their diversion into illegal circulation, and facilitate the investigation and prosecution of related offences without hampering legitimate transfers. \n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international trade in conventional arms, ranging from small arms to battle tanks, combat aircraft and warships. \n The Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects as amended on 21 December 2001 bans or restricts the use of specific types of weapons that are considered to cause unnecessary or unjustifiable suffering to combatants or to affect civilians indiscriminately. \n The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction prohibits the development, production, stockpiling, transfer and use of anti-personnel mines. \n The Convention on Cluster Munitions prohibits all use, production, transfer and stockpiling of cluster munitions. It also establishes a framework for cooperation and assistance to ensure adequate support to survivors and their communities, clearance of contaminated areas, risk reduction education and destruction of stockpiles.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20856,14 +20856,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.7 International arms control framework ", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "These instruments include: \\n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts and Components and Ammunition, supplementing the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, is the only legally binding instrument at the global level to counter the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition.", + "Sentence": "These instruments include: \n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts and Components and Ammunition, supplementing the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, is the only legally binding instrument at the global level to counter the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition.", "newParagraph": "international arm control framework made number international legal instrument set obligation member state regard range arm control issue relevant ddr activity including management storage security transfer disposal arm ammunition related material instrument include n protocol illicit manufacturing trafficking firearm part component ammunition supplementing un convention transnational organized crime legally binding instrument global level counter illicit manufacturing trafficking firearm part component ammunition provides framework state control regulate licit arm arm flow prevent diversion illegal circulation facilitate investigation prosecution related offence without hampering legitimate transfer n arm trade treaty regulates international trade conventional arm ranging small arm battle tank combat aircraft warship n convention certain conventional weapon may deemed excessively injurious indiscriminate effect amended 21 december 2001 ban restricts use specific type weapon considered cause unnecessary unjustifiable suffering combatant affect civilian indiscriminately n convention prohibition use stockpiling production transfer antipersonnel mine destruction prohibits development production stockpiling transfer use antipersonnel mine n convention cluster munition prohibits use production transfer stockpiling cluster munition also establishes framework cooperation assistance ensure adequate support survivor community clearance contaminated area risk reduction education destruction stockpile", "ProcessedSent": "instrument include n protocol illicit manufacturing trafficking firearm part component ammunition supplementing un convention transnational organized crime legally binding instrument global level counter illicit manufacturing trafficking firearm part component ammunition", "SentID": 1158 }, { "ParagraphID": 444, - "Paragraph": "The international arms control framework is made up of a number of international legal instruments that set out obligations for Member States with regard to a range of arms control issues relevant to DDR activities, including the management, storage, security, transfer and disposal of arms, ammunition and related material. These instruments include: \\n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts and Components and Ammunition, supplementing the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, is the only legally binding instrument at the global level to counter the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. It provides a framework for States to control and regulate licit arms and arms flows, prevent their diversion into illegal circulation, and facilitate the investigation and prosecution of related offences without hampering legitimate transfers. \\n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international trade in conventional arms, ranging from small arms to battle tanks, combat aircraft and warships. \\n The Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects as amended on 21 December 2001 bans or restricts the use of specific types of weapons that are considered to cause unnecessary or unjustifiable suffering to combatants or to affect civilians indiscriminately. \\n The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction prohibits the development, production, stockpiling, transfer and use of anti-personnel mines. \\n The Convention on Cluster Munitions prohibits all use, production, transfer and stockpiling of cluster munitions. It also establishes a framework for cooperation and assistance to ensure adequate support to survivors and their communities, clearance of contaminated areas, risk reduction education and destruction of stockpiles.", + "Paragraph": "The international arms control framework is made up of a number of international legal instruments that set out obligations for Member States with regard to a range of arms control issues relevant to DDR activities, including the management, storage, security, transfer and disposal of arms, ammunition and related material. These instruments include: \n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts and Components and Ammunition, supplementing the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, is the only legally binding instrument at the global level to counter the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. It provides a framework for States to control and regulate licit arms and arms flows, prevent their diversion into illegal circulation, and facilitate the investigation and prosecution of related offences without hampering legitimate transfers. \n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international trade in conventional arms, ranging from small arms to battle tanks, combat aircraft and warships. \n The Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects as amended on 21 December 2001 bans or restricts the use of specific types of weapons that are considered to cause unnecessary or unjustifiable suffering to combatants or to affect civilians indiscriminately. \n The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction prohibits the development, production, stockpiling, transfer and use of anti-personnel mines. \n The Convention on Cluster Munitions prohibits all use, production, transfer and stockpiling of cluster munitions. It also establishes a framework for cooperation and assistance to ensure adequate support to survivors and their communities, clearance of contaminated areas, risk reduction education and destruction of stockpiles.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20881,7 +20881,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 444, - "Paragraph": "The international arms control framework is made up of a number of international legal instruments that set out obligations for Member States with regard to a range of arms control issues relevant to DDR activities, including the management, storage, security, transfer and disposal of arms, ammunition and related material. These instruments include: \\n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts and Components and Ammunition, supplementing the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, is the only legally binding instrument at the global level to counter the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. It provides a framework for States to control and regulate licit arms and arms flows, prevent their diversion into illegal circulation, and facilitate the investigation and prosecution of related offences without hampering legitimate transfers. \\n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international trade in conventional arms, ranging from small arms to battle tanks, combat aircraft and warships. \\n The Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects as amended on 21 December 2001 bans or restricts the use of specific types of weapons that are considered to cause unnecessary or unjustifiable suffering to combatants or to affect civilians indiscriminately. \\n The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction prohibits the development, production, stockpiling, transfer and use of anti-personnel mines. \\n The Convention on Cluster Munitions prohibits all use, production, transfer and stockpiling of cluster munitions. It also establishes a framework for cooperation and assistance to ensure adequate support to survivors and their communities, clearance of contaminated areas, risk reduction education and destruction of stockpiles.", + "Paragraph": "The international arms control framework is made up of a number of international legal instruments that set out obligations for Member States with regard to a range of arms control issues relevant to DDR activities, including the management, storage, security, transfer and disposal of arms, ammunition and related material. These instruments include: \n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts and Components and Ammunition, supplementing the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, is the only legally binding instrument at the global level to counter the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. It provides a framework for States to control and regulate licit arms and arms flows, prevent their diversion into illegal circulation, and facilitate the investigation and prosecution of related offences without hampering legitimate transfers. \n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international trade in conventional arms, ranging from small arms to battle tanks, combat aircraft and warships. \n The Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects as amended on 21 December 2001 bans or restricts the use of specific types of weapons that are considered to cause unnecessary or unjustifiable suffering to combatants or to affect civilians indiscriminately. \n The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction prohibits the development, production, stockpiling, transfer and use of anti-personnel mines. \n The Convention on Cluster Munitions prohibits all use, production, transfer and stockpiling of cluster munitions. It also establishes a framework for cooperation and assistance to ensure adequate support to survivors and their communities, clearance of contaminated areas, risk reduction education and destruction of stockpiles.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20892,14 +20892,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.7 International arms control framework ", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international trade in conventional arms, ranging from small arms to battle tanks, combat aircraft and warships.", + "Sentence": "\n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international trade in conventional arms, ranging from small arms to battle tanks, combat aircraft and warships.", "newParagraph": "international arm control framework made number international legal instrument set obligation member state regard range arm control issue relevant ddr activity including management storage security transfer disposal arm ammunition related material instrument include n protocol illicit manufacturing trafficking firearm part component ammunition supplementing un convention transnational organized crime legally binding instrument global level counter illicit manufacturing trafficking firearm part component ammunition provides framework state control regulate licit arm arm flow prevent diversion illegal circulation facilitate investigation prosecution related offence without hampering legitimate transfer n arm trade treaty regulates international trade conventional arm ranging small arm battle tank combat aircraft warship n convention certain conventional weapon may deemed excessively injurious indiscriminate effect amended 21 december 2001 ban restricts use specific type weapon considered cause unnecessary unjustifiable suffering combatant affect civilian indiscriminately n convention prohibition use stockpiling production transfer antipersonnel mine destruction prohibits development production stockpiling transfer use antipersonnel mine n convention cluster munition prohibits use production transfer stockpiling cluster munition also establishes framework cooperation assistance ensure adequate support survivor community clearance contaminated area risk reduction education destruction stockpile", "ProcessedSent": "n arm trade treaty regulates international trade conventional arm ranging small arm battle tank combat aircraft warship", "SentID": 1160 }, { "ParagraphID": 444, - "Paragraph": "The international arms control framework is made up of a number of international legal instruments that set out obligations for Member States with regard to a range of arms control issues relevant to DDR activities, including the management, storage, security, transfer and disposal of arms, ammunition and related material. These instruments include: \\n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts and Components and Ammunition, supplementing the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, is the only legally binding instrument at the global level to counter the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. It provides a framework for States to control and regulate licit arms and arms flows, prevent their diversion into illegal circulation, and facilitate the investigation and prosecution of related offences without hampering legitimate transfers. \\n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international trade in conventional arms, ranging from small arms to battle tanks, combat aircraft and warships. \\n The Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects as amended on 21 December 2001 bans or restricts the use of specific types of weapons that are considered to cause unnecessary or unjustifiable suffering to combatants or to affect civilians indiscriminately. \\n The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction prohibits the development, production, stockpiling, transfer and use of anti-personnel mines. \\n The Convention on Cluster Munitions prohibits all use, production, transfer and stockpiling of cluster munitions. It also establishes a framework for cooperation and assistance to ensure adequate support to survivors and their communities, clearance of contaminated areas, risk reduction education and destruction of stockpiles.", + "Paragraph": "The international arms control framework is made up of a number of international legal instruments that set out obligations for Member States with regard to a range of arms control issues relevant to DDR activities, including the management, storage, security, transfer and disposal of arms, ammunition and related material. These instruments include: \n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts and Components and Ammunition, supplementing the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, is the only legally binding instrument at the global level to counter the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. It provides a framework for States to control and regulate licit arms and arms flows, prevent their diversion into illegal circulation, and facilitate the investigation and prosecution of related offences without hampering legitimate transfers. \n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international trade in conventional arms, ranging from small arms to battle tanks, combat aircraft and warships. \n The Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects as amended on 21 December 2001 bans or restricts the use of specific types of weapons that are considered to cause unnecessary or unjustifiable suffering to combatants or to affect civilians indiscriminately. \n The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction prohibits the development, production, stockpiling, transfer and use of anti-personnel mines. \n The Convention on Cluster Munitions prohibits all use, production, transfer and stockpiling of cluster munitions. It also establishes a framework for cooperation and assistance to ensure adequate support to survivors and their communities, clearance of contaminated areas, risk reduction education and destruction of stockpiles.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20910,14 +20910,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.7 International arms control framework ", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects as amended on 21 December 2001 bans or restricts the use of specific types of weapons that are considered to cause unnecessary or unjustifiable suffering to combatants or to affect civilians indiscriminately.", + "Sentence": "\n The Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects as amended on 21 December 2001 bans or restricts the use of specific types of weapons that are considered to cause unnecessary or unjustifiable suffering to combatants or to affect civilians indiscriminately.", "newParagraph": "international arm control framework made number international legal instrument set obligation member state regard range arm control issue relevant ddr activity including management storage security transfer disposal arm ammunition related material instrument include n protocol illicit manufacturing trafficking firearm part component ammunition supplementing un convention transnational organized crime legally binding instrument global level counter illicit manufacturing trafficking firearm part component ammunition provides framework state control regulate licit arm arm flow prevent diversion illegal circulation facilitate investigation prosecution related offence without hampering legitimate transfer n arm trade treaty regulates international trade conventional arm ranging small arm battle tank combat aircraft warship n convention certain conventional weapon may deemed excessively injurious indiscriminate effect amended 21 december 2001 ban restricts use specific type weapon considered cause unnecessary unjustifiable suffering combatant affect civilian indiscriminately n convention prohibition use stockpiling production transfer antipersonnel mine destruction prohibits development production stockpiling transfer use antipersonnel mine n convention cluster munition prohibits use production transfer stockpiling cluster munition also establishes framework cooperation assistance ensure adequate support survivor community clearance contaminated area risk reduction education destruction stockpile", "ProcessedSent": "n convention certain conventional weapon may deemed excessively injurious indiscriminate effect amended 21 december 2001 ban restricts use specific type weapon considered cause unnecessary unjustifiable suffering combatant affect civilian indiscriminately", "SentID": 1161 }, { "ParagraphID": 444, - "Paragraph": "The international arms control framework is made up of a number of international legal instruments that set out obligations for Member States with regard to a range of arms control issues relevant to DDR activities, including the management, storage, security, transfer and disposal of arms, ammunition and related material. These instruments include: \\n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts and Components and Ammunition, supplementing the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, is the only legally binding instrument at the global level to counter the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. It provides a framework for States to control and regulate licit arms and arms flows, prevent their diversion into illegal circulation, and facilitate the investigation and prosecution of related offences without hampering legitimate transfers. \\n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international trade in conventional arms, ranging from small arms to battle tanks, combat aircraft and warships. \\n The Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects as amended on 21 December 2001 bans or restricts the use of specific types of weapons that are considered to cause unnecessary or unjustifiable suffering to combatants or to affect civilians indiscriminately. \\n The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction prohibits the development, production, stockpiling, transfer and use of anti-personnel mines. \\n The Convention on Cluster Munitions prohibits all use, production, transfer and stockpiling of cluster munitions. It also establishes a framework for cooperation and assistance to ensure adequate support to survivors and their communities, clearance of contaminated areas, risk reduction education and destruction of stockpiles.", + "Paragraph": "The international arms control framework is made up of a number of international legal instruments that set out obligations for Member States with regard to a range of arms control issues relevant to DDR activities, including the management, storage, security, transfer and disposal of arms, ammunition and related material. These instruments include: \n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts and Components and Ammunition, supplementing the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, is the only legally binding instrument at the global level to counter the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. It provides a framework for States to control and regulate licit arms and arms flows, prevent their diversion into illegal circulation, and facilitate the investigation and prosecution of related offences without hampering legitimate transfers. \n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international trade in conventional arms, ranging from small arms to battle tanks, combat aircraft and warships. \n The Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects as amended on 21 December 2001 bans or restricts the use of specific types of weapons that are considered to cause unnecessary or unjustifiable suffering to combatants or to affect civilians indiscriminately. \n The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction prohibits the development, production, stockpiling, transfer and use of anti-personnel mines. \n The Convention on Cluster Munitions prohibits all use, production, transfer and stockpiling of cluster munitions. It also establishes a framework for cooperation and assistance to ensure adequate support to survivors and their communities, clearance of contaminated areas, risk reduction education and destruction of stockpiles.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20928,14 +20928,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.7 International arms control framework ", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction prohibits the development, production, stockpiling, transfer and use of anti-personnel mines.", + "Sentence": "\n The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction prohibits the development, production, stockpiling, transfer and use of anti-personnel mines.", "newParagraph": "international arm control framework made number international legal instrument set obligation member state regard range arm control issue relevant ddr activity including management storage security transfer disposal arm ammunition related material instrument include n protocol illicit manufacturing trafficking firearm part component ammunition supplementing un convention transnational organized crime legally binding instrument global level counter illicit manufacturing trafficking firearm part component ammunition provides framework state control regulate licit arm arm flow prevent diversion illegal circulation facilitate investigation prosecution related offence without hampering legitimate transfer n arm trade treaty regulates international trade conventional arm ranging small arm battle tank combat aircraft warship n convention certain conventional weapon may deemed excessively injurious indiscriminate effect amended 21 december 2001 ban restricts use specific type weapon considered cause unnecessary unjustifiable suffering combatant affect civilian indiscriminately n convention prohibition use stockpiling production transfer antipersonnel mine destruction prohibits development production stockpiling transfer use antipersonnel mine n convention cluster munition prohibits use production transfer stockpiling cluster munition also establishes framework cooperation assistance ensure adequate support survivor community clearance contaminated area risk reduction education destruction stockpile", "ProcessedSent": "n convention prohibition use stockpiling production transfer antipersonnel mine destruction prohibits development production stockpiling transfer use antipersonnel mine", "SentID": 1162 }, { "ParagraphID": 444, - "Paragraph": "The international arms control framework is made up of a number of international legal instruments that set out obligations for Member States with regard to a range of arms control issues relevant to DDR activities, including the management, storage, security, transfer and disposal of arms, ammunition and related material. These instruments include: \\n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts and Components and Ammunition, supplementing the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, is the only legally binding instrument at the global level to counter the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. It provides a framework for States to control and regulate licit arms and arms flows, prevent their diversion into illegal circulation, and facilitate the investigation and prosecution of related offences without hampering legitimate transfers. \\n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international trade in conventional arms, ranging from small arms to battle tanks, combat aircraft and warships. \\n The Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects as amended on 21 December 2001 bans or restricts the use of specific types of weapons that are considered to cause unnecessary or unjustifiable suffering to combatants or to affect civilians indiscriminately. \\n The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction prohibits the development, production, stockpiling, transfer and use of anti-personnel mines. \\n The Convention on Cluster Munitions prohibits all use, production, transfer and stockpiling of cluster munitions. It also establishes a framework for cooperation and assistance to ensure adequate support to survivors and their communities, clearance of contaminated areas, risk reduction education and destruction of stockpiles.", + "Paragraph": "The international arms control framework is made up of a number of international legal instruments that set out obligations for Member States with regard to a range of arms control issues relevant to DDR activities, including the management, storage, security, transfer and disposal of arms, ammunition and related material. These instruments include: \n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts and Components and Ammunition, supplementing the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, is the only legally binding instrument at the global level to counter the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. It provides a framework for States to control and regulate licit arms and arms flows, prevent their diversion into illegal circulation, and facilitate the investigation and prosecution of related offences without hampering legitimate transfers. \n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international trade in conventional arms, ranging from small arms to battle tanks, combat aircraft and warships. \n The Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects as amended on 21 December 2001 bans or restricts the use of specific types of weapons that are considered to cause unnecessary or unjustifiable suffering to combatants or to affect civilians indiscriminately. \n The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction prohibits the development, production, stockpiling, transfer and use of anti-personnel mines. \n The Convention on Cluster Munitions prohibits all use, production, transfer and stockpiling of cluster munitions. It also establishes a framework for cooperation and assistance to ensure adequate support to survivors and their communities, clearance of contaminated areas, risk reduction education and destruction of stockpiles.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20946,14 +20946,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.7 International arms control framework ", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The Convention on Cluster Munitions prohibits all use, production, transfer and stockpiling of cluster munitions.", + "Sentence": "\n The Convention on Cluster Munitions prohibits all use, production, transfer and stockpiling of cluster munitions.", "newParagraph": "international arm control framework made number international legal instrument set obligation member state regard range arm control issue relevant ddr activity including management storage security transfer disposal arm ammunition related material instrument include n protocol illicit manufacturing trafficking firearm part component ammunition supplementing un convention transnational organized crime legally binding instrument global level counter illicit manufacturing trafficking firearm part component ammunition provides framework state control regulate licit arm arm flow prevent diversion illegal circulation facilitate investigation prosecution related offence without hampering legitimate transfer n arm trade treaty regulates international trade conventional arm ranging small arm battle tank combat aircraft warship n convention certain conventional weapon may deemed excessively injurious indiscriminate effect amended 21 december 2001 ban restricts use specific type weapon considered cause unnecessary unjustifiable suffering combatant affect civilian indiscriminately n convention prohibition use stockpiling production transfer antipersonnel mine destruction prohibits development production stockpiling transfer use antipersonnel mine n convention cluster munition prohibits use production transfer stockpiling cluster munition also establishes framework cooperation assistance ensure adequate support survivor community clearance contaminated area risk reduction education destruction stockpile", "ProcessedSent": "n convention cluster munition prohibits use production transfer stockpiling cluster munition", "SentID": 1163 }, { "ParagraphID": 444, - "Paragraph": "The international arms control framework is made up of a number of international legal instruments that set out obligations for Member States with regard to a range of arms control issues relevant to DDR activities, including the management, storage, security, transfer and disposal of arms, ammunition and related material. These instruments include: \\n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts and Components and Ammunition, supplementing the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, is the only legally binding instrument at the global level to counter the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. It provides a framework for States to control and regulate licit arms and arms flows, prevent their diversion into illegal circulation, and facilitate the investigation and prosecution of related offences without hampering legitimate transfers. \\n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international trade in conventional arms, ranging from small arms to battle tanks, combat aircraft and warships. \\n The Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects as amended on 21 December 2001 bans or restricts the use of specific types of weapons that are considered to cause unnecessary or unjustifiable suffering to combatants or to affect civilians indiscriminately. \\n The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction prohibits the development, production, stockpiling, transfer and use of anti-personnel mines. \\n The Convention on Cluster Munitions prohibits all use, production, transfer and stockpiling of cluster munitions. It also establishes a framework for cooperation and assistance to ensure adequate support to survivors and their communities, clearance of contaminated areas, risk reduction education and destruction of stockpiles.", + "Paragraph": "The international arms control framework is made up of a number of international legal instruments that set out obligations for Member States with regard to a range of arms control issues relevant to DDR activities, including the management, storage, security, transfer and disposal of arms, ammunition and related material. These instruments include: \n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts and Components and Ammunition, supplementing the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, is the only legally binding instrument at the global level to counter the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. It provides a framework for States to control and regulate licit arms and arms flows, prevent their diversion into illegal circulation, and facilitate the investigation and prosecution of related offences without hampering legitimate transfers. \n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international trade in conventional arms, ranging from small arms to battle tanks, combat aircraft and warships. \n The Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects as amended on 21 December 2001 bans or restricts the use of specific types of weapons that are considered to cause unnecessary or unjustifiable suffering to combatants or to affect civilians indiscriminately. \n The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction prohibits the development, production, stockpiling, transfer and use of anti-personnel mines. \n The Convention on Cluster Munitions prohibits all use, production, transfer and stockpiling of cluster munitions. It also establishes a framework for cooperation and assistance to ensure adequate support to survivors and their communities, clearance of contaminated areas, risk reduction education and destruction of stockpiles.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20971,7 +20971,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 445, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n In addition to relevant national legislation, DDR practitioners should be aware of the international and regional legal instruments that the State in which the DDR practitioner is operating has ratified, and how these may impact the design of disarmament and transitional weapons and ammunition management activities (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament and IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammunition Management).", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n In addition to relevant national legislation, DDR practitioners should be aware of the international and regional legal instruments that the State in which the DDR practitioner is operating has ratified, and how these may impact the design of disarmament and transitional weapons and ammunition management activities (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament and IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammunition Management).", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -20982,7 +20982,7 @@ "Heading2": "4.2 Normative legal framework ", "Heading3": "4.2.7 International arms control framework ", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Specific guiding principles \\n In addition to relevant national legislation, DDR practitioners should be aware of the international and regional legal instruments that the State in which the DDR practitioner is operating has ratified, and how these may impact the design of disarmament and transitional weapons and ammunition management activities (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament and IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammunition Management).", + "Sentence": "Specific guiding principles \n In addition to relevant national legislation, DDR practitioners should be aware of the international and regional legal instruments that the State in which the DDR practitioner is operating has ratified, and how these may impact the design of disarmament and transitional weapons and ammunition management activities (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament and IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammunition Management).", "newParagraph": "specific guiding principle n addition relevant national legislation ddr practitioner aware international regional legal instrument state ddr practitioner operating ratified may impact design disarmament transitional weapon ammunition management activity see iddrs 410 disarmament iddrs 411 transitional weapon ammunition management", "ProcessedSent": "specific guiding principle n addition relevant national legislation ddr practitioner aware international regional legal instrument state ddr practitioner operating ratified may impact design disarmament transitional weapon ammunition management activity see iddrs 410 disarmament iddrs 411 transitional weapon ammunition management", "SentID": 1165 @@ -21061,7 +21061,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 448, - "Paragraph": "For example, the following issues would usually be addressed in a Member State\u2019s domestic legislation, in particular its constitution and criminal procedure code: \\n Length of pretrial detention; \\n Due process rights; \\n Protections and procedure with regard to investigations and prosecutions of alleged crimes, and \\n Criminal penalties", + "Paragraph": "For example, the following issues would usually be addressed in a Member State\u2019s domestic legislation, in particular its constitution and criminal procedure code: \n Length of pretrial detention; \n Due process rights; \n Protections and procedure with regard to investigations and prosecutions of alleged crimes, and \n Criminal penalties", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -21072,7 +21072,7 @@ "Heading2": "4.3 Member States\u2019 international obligations and domestic legal framework ", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "For example, the following issues would usually be addressed in a Member State\u2019s domestic legislation, in particular its constitution and criminal procedure code: \\n Length of pretrial detention; \\n Due process rights; \\n Protections and procedure with regard to investigations and prosecutions of alleged crimes, and \\n Criminal penalties", + "Sentence": "For example, the following issues would usually be addressed in a Member State\u2019s domestic legislation, in particular its constitution and criminal procedure code: \n Length of pretrial detention; \n Due process rights; \n Protections and procedure with regard to investigations and prosecutions of alleged crimes, and \n Criminal penalties", "newParagraph": "example following issue would usually addressed member state domestic legislation particular constitution criminal procedure code n length pretrial detention n due process right n protection procedure regard investigation prosecution alleged crime n criminal penalty", "ProcessedSent": "example following issue would usually addressed member state domestic legislation particular constitution criminal procedure code n length pretrial detention n due process right n protection procedure regard investigation prosecution alleged crime n criminal penalty", "SentID": 1170 @@ -21115,7 +21115,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 451, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of the international conventions that the Member State, in which they operate, has signed and ratified. \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of domestic legislation that may address the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries, as well as limit their participation in DDR processes, in particular the penal code, criminal procedure code and counter-terrorism legislation. \\n DDR practitioners may wish to rely on domestic legislation to secure the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries within the Member State, as appropriate and necessary", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware of the international conventions that the Member State, in which they operate, has signed and ratified. \n DDR practitioners should be aware of domestic legislation that may address the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries, as well as limit their participation in DDR processes, in particular the penal code, criminal procedure code and counter-terrorism legislation. \n DDR practitioners may wish to rely on domestic legislation to secure the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries within the Member State, as appropriate and necessary", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -21126,14 +21126,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.3 Member States\u2019 international obligations and domestic legal framework ", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of the international conventions that the Member State, in which they operate, has signed and ratified.", + "Sentence": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware of the international conventions that the Member State, in which they operate, has signed and ratified.", "newParagraph": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner aware international convention member state operate signed ratified n ddr practitioner aware domestic legislation may address right freedom ddr participant beneficiary well limit participation ddr process particular penal code criminal procedure code counterterrorism legislation n ddr practitioner may wish rely domestic legislation secure right freedom ddr participant beneficiary within member state appropriate necessary", "ProcessedSent": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner aware international convention member state operate signed ratified", "SentID": 1173 }, { "ParagraphID": 451, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of the international conventions that the Member State, in which they operate, has signed and ratified. \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of domestic legislation that may address the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries, as well as limit their participation in DDR processes, in particular the penal code, criminal procedure code and counter-terrorism legislation. \\n DDR practitioners may wish to rely on domestic legislation to secure the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries within the Member State, as appropriate and necessary", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware of the international conventions that the Member State, in which they operate, has signed and ratified. \n DDR practitioners should be aware of domestic legislation that may address the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries, as well as limit their participation in DDR processes, in particular the penal code, criminal procedure code and counter-terrorism legislation. \n DDR practitioners may wish to rely on domestic legislation to secure the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries within the Member State, as appropriate and necessary", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -21144,14 +21144,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.3 Member States\u2019 international obligations and domestic legal framework ", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n DDR practitioners should be aware of domestic legislation that may address the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries, as well as limit their participation in DDR processes, in particular the penal code, criminal procedure code and counter-terrorism legislation.", + "Sentence": "\n DDR practitioners should be aware of domestic legislation that may address the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries, as well as limit their participation in DDR processes, in particular the penal code, criminal procedure code and counter-terrorism legislation.", "newParagraph": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner aware international convention member state operate signed ratified n ddr practitioner aware domestic legislation may address right freedom ddr participant beneficiary well limit participation ddr process particular penal code criminal procedure code counterterrorism legislation n ddr practitioner may wish rely domestic legislation secure right freedom ddr participant beneficiary within member state appropriate necessary", "ProcessedSent": "n ddr practitioner aware domestic legislation may address right freedom ddr participant beneficiary well limit participation ddr process particular penal code criminal procedure code counterterrorism legislation", "SentID": 1174 }, { "ParagraphID": 451, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of the international conventions that the Member State, in which they operate, has signed and ratified. \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of domestic legislation that may address the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries, as well as limit their participation in DDR processes, in particular the penal code, criminal procedure code and counter-terrorism legislation. \\n DDR practitioners may wish to rely on domestic legislation to secure the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries within the Member State, as appropriate and necessary", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware of the international conventions that the Member State, in which they operate, has signed and ratified. \n DDR practitioners should be aware of domestic legislation that may address the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries, as well as limit their participation in DDR processes, in particular the penal code, criminal procedure code and counter-terrorism legislation. \n DDR practitioners may wish to rely on domestic legislation to secure the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries within the Member State, as appropriate and necessary", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -21162,14 +21162,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.3 Member States\u2019 international obligations and domestic legal framework ", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n DDR practitioners may wish to rely on domestic legislation to secure the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries within the Member State, as appropriate and necessary", + "Sentence": "\n DDR practitioners may wish to rely on domestic legislation to secure the rights and freedoms of DDR participants and beneficiaries within the Member State, as appropriate and necessary", "newParagraph": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner aware international convention member state operate signed ratified n ddr practitioner aware domestic legislation may address right freedom ddr participant beneficiary well limit participation ddr process particular penal code criminal procedure code counterterrorism legislation n ddr practitioner may wish rely domestic legislation secure right freedom ddr participant beneficiary within member state appropriate necessary", "ProcessedSent": "n ddr practitioner may wish rely domestic legislation secure right freedom ddr participant beneficiary within member state appropriate necessary", "SentID": 1175 }, { "ParagraphID": 452, - "Paragraph": "Red line \\n DDR practitioners shall respect the national laws of the host State. If there is a concern regarding the obligation to respect a host State\u2019s law and the activities of the DDR practitioner, the DDR practitioner should seek legal advice.", + "Paragraph": "Red line \n DDR practitioners shall respect the national laws of the host State. If there is a concern regarding the obligation to respect a host State\u2019s law and the activities of the DDR practitioner, the DDR practitioner should seek legal advice.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -21180,14 +21180,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.3 Member States\u2019 international obligations and domestic legal framework ", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Red line \\n DDR practitioners shall respect the national laws of the host State.", + "Sentence": "Red line \n DDR practitioners shall respect the national laws of the host State.", "newParagraph": "red line n ddr practitioner shall respect national law host state concern regarding obligation respect host state law activity ddr practitioner ddr practitioner seek legal advice", "ProcessedSent": "red line n ddr practitioner shall respect national law host state", "SentID": 1176 }, { "ParagraphID": 452, - "Paragraph": "Red line \\n DDR practitioners shall respect the national laws of the host State. If there is a concern regarding the obligation to respect a host State\u2019s law and the activities of the DDR practitioner, the DDR practitioner should seek legal advice.", + "Paragraph": "Red line \n DDR practitioners shall respect the national laws of the host State. If there is a concern regarding the obligation to respect a host State\u2019s law and the activities of the DDR practitioner, the DDR practitioner should seek legal advice.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -21277,7 +21277,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 455, - "Paragraph": "The general guide for UN-supported DDR processes is the UN IDDRS. Other internal documents that may be relevant to DDR processes include the following: \\n The UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy (HRDDP) (A\/67\/775-S\/2013\/110) governs the UN\u2019s provision of support to non-UN security forces, which could include the provision of support to national DDR processes if such processes or their programmes are being implemented by security forces, or if there is any repatriation of DDR participants and beneficiaries by security forces. The HRDDP requires UN entities that are contemplating providing support to non-UN security forces to take certain due diligence, compliance and monitoring measures with the aim of ensuring that receiving entities do not commit grave violations of international humanitarian law, international human rights law or refugee law. Where there are substantial grounds for believing that grave violations are occurring or have occurred, involving security forces to which support is being provided by the UN, the UN shall intercede with the competent authorities to bring such violations to an end and\/or seek accountability in respect of them. For further information, please refer to the Guidance Note for the implementation of the HRDDP.28 \\n The Secretary-General issued a bulletin on special measures for protection from sexual exploitation and sexual abuse (ST\/SGB\/2003\/13), which applies to the staff of all UN departments, programmes, funds and agencies, prohibiting them from committing acts of sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. In line with the UN Staff Regulations and Rules, sexual exploitation and sexual abuse constitute acts of serious misconduct and are therefore grounds for disciplinary measures, including dismissal. Further, UN staff are obliged to create and maintain an environment that prevents sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. Managers at all levels have a particular responsibility to support and develop systems that maintain this environment.", + "Paragraph": "The general guide for UN-supported DDR processes is the UN IDDRS. Other internal documents that may be relevant to DDR processes include the following: \n The UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy (HRDDP) (A\/67\/775-S\/2013\/110) governs the UN\u2019s provision of support to non-UN security forces, which could include the provision of support to national DDR processes if such processes or their programmes are being implemented by security forces, or if there is any repatriation of DDR participants and beneficiaries by security forces. The HRDDP requires UN entities that are contemplating providing support to non-UN security forces to take certain due diligence, compliance and monitoring measures with the aim of ensuring that receiving entities do not commit grave violations of international humanitarian law, international human rights law or refugee law. Where there are substantial grounds for believing that grave violations are occurring or have occurred, involving security forces to which support is being provided by the UN, the UN shall intercede with the competent authorities to bring such violations to an end and\/or seek accountability in respect of them. For further information, please refer to the Guidance Note for the implementation of the HRDDP.28 \n The Secretary-General issued a bulletin on special measures for protection from sexual exploitation and sexual abuse (ST\/SGB\/2003\/13), which applies to the staff of all UN departments, programmes, funds and agencies, prohibiting them from committing acts of sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. In line with the UN Staff Regulations and Rules, sexual exploitation and sexual abuse constitute acts of serious misconduct and are therefore grounds for disciplinary measures, including dismissal. Further, UN staff are obliged to create and maintain an environment that prevents sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. Managers at all levels have a particular responsibility to support and develop systems that maintain this environment.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -21295,7 +21295,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 455, - "Paragraph": "The general guide for UN-supported DDR processes is the UN IDDRS. Other internal documents that may be relevant to DDR processes include the following: \\n The UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy (HRDDP) (A\/67\/775-S\/2013\/110) governs the UN\u2019s provision of support to non-UN security forces, which could include the provision of support to national DDR processes if such processes or their programmes are being implemented by security forces, or if there is any repatriation of DDR participants and beneficiaries by security forces. The HRDDP requires UN entities that are contemplating providing support to non-UN security forces to take certain due diligence, compliance and monitoring measures with the aim of ensuring that receiving entities do not commit grave violations of international humanitarian law, international human rights law or refugee law. Where there are substantial grounds for believing that grave violations are occurring or have occurred, involving security forces to which support is being provided by the UN, the UN shall intercede with the competent authorities to bring such violations to an end and\/or seek accountability in respect of them. For further information, please refer to the Guidance Note for the implementation of the HRDDP.28 \\n The Secretary-General issued a bulletin on special measures for protection from sexual exploitation and sexual abuse (ST\/SGB\/2003\/13), which applies to the staff of all UN departments, programmes, funds and agencies, prohibiting them from committing acts of sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. In line with the UN Staff Regulations and Rules, sexual exploitation and sexual abuse constitute acts of serious misconduct and are therefore grounds for disciplinary measures, including dismissal. Further, UN staff are obliged to create and maintain an environment that prevents sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. Managers at all levels have a particular responsibility to support and develop systems that maintain this environment.", + "Paragraph": "The general guide for UN-supported DDR processes is the UN IDDRS. Other internal documents that may be relevant to DDR processes include the following: \n The UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy (HRDDP) (A\/67\/775-S\/2013\/110) governs the UN\u2019s provision of support to non-UN security forces, which could include the provision of support to national DDR processes if such processes or their programmes are being implemented by security forces, or if there is any repatriation of DDR participants and beneficiaries by security forces. The HRDDP requires UN entities that are contemplating providing support to non-UN security forces to take certain due diligence, compliance and monitoring measures with the aim of ensuring that receiving entities do not commit grave violations of international humanitarian law, international human rights law or refugee law. Where there are substantial grounds for believing that grave violations are occurring or have occurred, involving security forces to which support is being provided by the UN, the UN shall intercede with the competent authorities to bring such violations to an end and\/or seek accountability in respect of them. For further information, please refer to the Guidance Note for the implementation of the HRDDP.28 \n The Secretary-General issued a bulletin on special measures for protection from sexual exploitation and sexual abuse (ST\/SGB\/2003\/13), which applies to the staff of all UN departments, programmes, funds and agencies, prohibiting them from committing acts of sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. In line with the UN Staff Regulations and Rules, sexual exploitation and sexual abuse constitute acts of serious misconduct and are therefore grounds for disciplinary measures, including dismissal. Further, UN staff are obliged to create and maintain an environment that prevents sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. Managers at all levels have a particular responsibility to support and develop systems that maintain this environment.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -21306,14 +21306,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.4 Internal rules, policies and procedures", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Other internal documents that may be relevant to DDR processes include the following: \\n The UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy (HRDDP) (A\/67\/775-S\/2013\/110) governs the UN\u2019s provision of support to non-UN security forces, which could include the provision of support to national DDR processes if such processes or their programmes are being implemented by security forces, or if there is any repatriation of DDR participants and beneficiaries by security forces.", + "Sentence": "Other internal documents that may be relevant to DDR processes include the following: \n The UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy (HRDDP) (A\/67\/775-S\/2013\/110) governs the UN\u2019s provision of support to non-UN security forces, which could include the provision of support to national DDR processes if such processes or their programmes are being implemented by security forces, or if there is any repatriation of DDR participants and beneficiaries by security forces.", "newParagraph": "general guide unsupported ddr process un iddrs internal document may relevant ddr process include following n un human right due diligence policy hrddp a67775s2013110 governs un provision support nonun security force could include provision support national ddr process process programme implemented security force repatriation ddr participant beneficiary security force hrddp requires un entity contemplating providing support nonun security force take certain due diligence compliance monitoring measure aim ensuring receiving entity commit grave violation international humanitarian law international human right law refugee law substantial ground believing grave violation occurring occurred involving security force support provided un un shall intercede competent authority bring violation end andor seek accountability respect information please refer guidance note implementation hrddp28 n secretarygeneral issued bulletin special measure protection sexual exploitation sexual abuse stsgb200313 applies staff un department programme fund agency prohibiting committing act sexual exploitation sexual abuse line un staff regulation rule sexual exploitation sexual abuse constitute act serious misconduct therefore ground disciplinary measure including dismissal un staff obliged create maintain environment prevents sexual exploitation sexual abuse manager level particular responsibility support develop system maintain environment", "ProcessedSent": "internal document may relevant ddr process include following n un human right due diligence policy hrddp a67775s2013110 governs un provision support nonun security force could include provision support national ddr process process programme implemented security force repatriation ddr participant beneficiary security force", "SentID": 1183 }, { "ParagraphID": 455, - "Paragraph": "The general guide for UN-supported DDR processes is the UN IDDRS. Other internal documents that may be relevant to DDR processes include the following: \\n The UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy (HRDDP) (A\/67\/775-S\/2013\/110) governs the UN\u2019s provision of support to non-UN security forces, which could include the provision of support to national DDR processes if such processes or their programmes are being implemented by security forces, or if there is any repatriation of DDR participants and beneficiaries by security forces. The HRDDP requires UN entities that are contemplating providing support to non-UN security forces to take certain due diligence, compliance and monitoring measures with the aim of ensuring that receiving entities do not commit grave violations of international humanitarian law, international human rights law or refugee law. Where there are substantial grounds for believing that grave violations are occurring or have occurred, involving security forces to which support is being provided by the UN, the UN shall intercede with the competent authorities to bring such violations to an end and\/or seek accountability in respect of them. For further information, please refer to the Guidance Note for the implementation of the HRDDP.28 \\n The Secretary-General issued a bulletin on special measures for protection from sexual exploitation and sexual abuse (ST\/SGB\/2003\/13), which applies to the staff of all UN departments, programmes, funds and agencies, prohibiting them from committing acts of sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. In line with the UN Staff Regulations and Rules, sexual exploitation and sexual abuse constitute acts of serious misconduct and are therefore grounds for disciplinary measures, including dismissal. Further, UN staff are obliged to create and maintain an environment that prevents sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. Managers at all levels have a particular responsibility to support and develop systems that maintain this environment.", + "Paragraph": "The general guide for UN-supported DDR processes is the UN IDDRS. Other internal documents that may be relevant to DDR processes include the following: \n The UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy (HRDDP) (A\/67\/775-S\/2013\/110) governs the UN\u2019s provision of support to non-UN security forces, which could include the provision of support to national DDR processes if such processes or their programmes are being implemented by security forces, or if there is any repatriation of DDR participants and beneficiaries by security forces. The HRDDP requires UN entities that are contemplating providing support to non-UN security forces to take certain due diligence, compliance and monitoring measures with the aim of ensuring that receiving entities do not commit grave violations of international humanitarian law, international human rights law or refugee law. Where there are substantial grounds for believing that grave violations are occurring or have occurred, involving security forces to which support is being provided by the UN, the UN shall intercede with the competent authorities to bring such violations to an end and\/or seek accountability in respect of them. For further information, please refer to the Guidance Note for the implementation of the HRDDP.28 \n The Secretary-General issued a bulletin on special measures for protection from sexual exploitation and sexual abuse (ST\/SGB\/2003\/13), which applies to the staff of all UN departments, programmes, funds and agencies, prohibiting them from committing acts of sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. In line with the UN Staff Regulations and Rules, sexual exploitation and sexual abuse constitute acts of serious misconduct and are therefore grounds for disciplinary measures, including dismissal. Further, UN staff are obliged to create and maintain an environment that prevents sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. Managers at all levels have a particular responsibility to support and develop systems that maintain this environment.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -21331,7 +21331,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 455, - "Paragraph": "The general guide for UN-supported DDR processes is the UN IDDRS. Other internal documents that may be relevant to DDR processes include the following: \\n The UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy (HRDDP) (A\/67\/775-S\/2013\/110) governs the UN\u2019s provision of support to non-UN security forces, which could include the provision of support to national DDR processes if such processes or their programmes are being implemented by security forces, or if there is any repatriation of DDR participants and beneficiaries by security forces. The HRDDP requires UN entities that are contemplating providing support to non-UN security forces to take certain due diligence, compliance and monitoring measures with the aim of ensuring that receiving entities do not commit grave violations of international humanitarian law, international human rights law or refugee law. Where there are substantial grounds for believing that grave violations are occurring or have occurred, involving security forces to which support is being provided by the UN, the UN shall intercede with the competent authorities to bring such violations to an end and\/or seek accountability in respect of them. For further information, please refer to the Guidance Note for the implementation of the HRDDP.28 \\n The Secretary-General issued a bulletin on special measures for protection from sexual exploitation and sexual abuse (ST\/SGB\/2003\/13), which applies to the staff of all UN departments, programmes, funds and agencies, prohibiting them from committing acts of sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. In line with the UN Staff Regulations and Rules, sexual exploitation and sexual abuse constitute acts of serious misconduct and are therefore grounds for disciplinary measures, including dismissal. Further, UN staff are obliged to create and maintain an environment that prevents sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. Managers at all levels have a particular responsibility to support and develop systems that maintain this environment.", + "Paragraph": "The general guide for UN-supported DDR processes is the UN IDDRS. Other internal documents that may be relevant to DDR processes include the following: \n The UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy (HRDDP) (A\/67\/775-S\/2013\/110) governs the UN\u2019s provision of support to non-UN security forces, which could include the provision of support to national DDR processes if such processes or their programmes are being implemented by security forces, or if there is any repatriation of DDR participants and beneficiaries by security forces. The HRDDP requires UN entities that are contemplating providing support to non-UN security forces to take certain due diligence, compliance and monitoring measures with the aim of ensuring that receiving entities do not commit grave violations of international humanitarian law, international human rights law or refugee law. Where there are substantial grounds for believing that grave violations are occurring or have occurred, involving security forces to which support is being provided by the UN, the UN shall intercede with the competent authorities to bring such violations to an end and\/or seek accountability in respect of them. For further information, please refer to the Guidance Note for the implementation of the HRDDP.28 \n The Secretary-General issued a bulletin on special measures for protection from sexual exploitation and sexual abuse (ST\/SGB\/2003\/13), which applies to the staff of all UN departments, programmes, funds and agencies, prohibiting them from committing acts of sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. In line with the UN Staff Regulations and Rules, sexual exploitation and sexual abuse constitute acts of serious misconduct and are therefore grounds for disciplinary measures, including dismissal. Further, UN staff are obliged to create and maintain an environment that prevents sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. Managers at all levels have a particular responsibility to support and develop systems that maintain this environment.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -21349,7 +21349,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 455, - "Paragraph": "The general guide for UN-supported DDR processes is the UN IDDRS. Other internal documents that may be relevant to DDR processes include the following: \\n The UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy (HRDDP) (A\/67\/775-S\/2013\/110) governs the UN\u2019s provision of support to non-UN security forces, which could include the provision of support to national DDR processes if such processes or their programmes are being implemented by security forces, or if there is any repatriation of DDR participants and beneficiaries by security forces. The HRDDP requires UN entities that are contemplating providing support to non-UN security forces to take certain due diligence, compliance and monitoring measures with the aim of ensuring that receiving entities do not commit grave violations of international humanitarian law, international human rights law or refugee law. Where there are substantial grounds for believing that grave violations are occurring or have occurred, involving security forces to which support is being provided by the UN, the UN shall intercede with the competent authorities to bring such violations to an end and\/or seek accountability in respect of them. For further information, please refer to the Guidance Note for the implementation of the HRDDP.28 \\n The Secretary-General issued a bulletin on special measures for protection from sexual exploitation and sexual abuse (ST\/SGB\/2003\/13), which applies to the staff of all UN departments, programmes, funds and agencies, prohibiting them from committing acts of sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. In line with the UN Staff Regulations and Rules, sexual exploitation and sexual abuse constitute acts of serious misconduct and are therefore grounds for disciplinary measures, including dismissal. Further, UN staff are obliged to create and maintain an environment that prevents sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. Managers at all levels have a particular responsibility to support and develop systems that maintain this environment.", + "Paragraph": "The general guide for UN-supported DDR processes is the UN IDDRS. Other internal documents that may be relevant to DDR processes include the following: \n The UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy (HRDDP) (A\/67\/775-S\/2013\/110) governs the UN\u2019s provision of support to non-UN security forces, which could include the provision of support to national DDR processes if such processes or their programmes are being implemented by security forces, or if there is any repatriation of DDR participants and beneficiaries by security forces. The HRDDP requires UN entities that are contemplating providing support to non-UN security forces to take certain due diligence, compliance and monitoring measures with the aim of ensuring that receiving entities do not commit grave violations of international humanitarian law, international human rights law or refugee law. Where there are substantial grounds for believing that grave violations are occurring or have occurred, involving security forces to which support is being provided by the UN, the UN shall intercede with the competent authorities to bring such violations to an end and\/or seek accountability in respect of them. For further information, please refer to the Guidance Note for the implementation of the HRDDP.28 \n The Secretary-General issued a bulletin on special measures for protection from sexual exploitation and sexual abuse (ST\/SGB\/2003\/13), which applies to the staff of all UN departments, programmes, funds and agencies, prohibiting them from committing acts of sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. In line with the UN Staff Regulations and Rules, sexual exploitation and sexual abuse constitute acts of serious misconduct and are therefore grounds for disciplinary measures, including dismissal. Further, UN staff are obliged to create and maintain an environment that prevents sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. Managers at all levels have a particular responsibility to support and develop systems that maintain this environment.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -21360,14 +21360,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.4 Internal rules, policies and procedures", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "For further information, please refer to the Guidance Note for the implementation of the HRDDP.28 \\n The Secretary-General issued a bulletin on special measures for protection from sexual exploitation and sexual abuse (ST\/SGB\/2003\/13), which applies to the staff of all UN departments, programmes, funds and agencies, prohibiting them from committing acts of sexual exploitation and sexual abuse.", + "Sentence": "For further information, please refer to the Guidance Note for the implementation of the HRDDP.28 \n The Secretary-General issued a bulletin on special measures for protection from sexual exploitation and sexual abuse (ST\/SGB\/2003\/13), which applies to the staff of all UN departments, programmes, funds and agencies, prohibiting them from committing acts of sexual exploitation and sexual abuse.", "newParagraph": "general guide unsupported ddr process un iddrs internal document may relevant ddr process include following n un human right due diligence policy hrddp a67775s2013110 governs un provision support nonun security force could include provision support national ddr process process programme implemented security force repatriation ddr participant beneficiary security force hrddp requires un entity contemplating providing support nonun security force take certain due diligence compliance monitoring measure aim ensuring receiving entity commit grave violation international humanitarian law international human right law refugee law substantial ground believing grave violation occurring occurred involving security force support provided un un shall intercede competent authority bring violation end andor seek accountability respect information please refer guidance note implementation hrddp28 n secretarygeneral issued bulletin special measure protection sexual exploitation sexual abuse stsgb200313 applies staff un department programme fund agency prohibiting committing act sexual exploitation sexual abuse line un staff regulation rule sexual exploitation sexual abuse constitute act serious misconduct therefore ground disciplinary measure including dismissal un staff obliged create maintain environment prevents sexual exploitation sexual abuse manager level particular responsibility support develop system maintain environment", "ProcessedSent": "information please refer guidance note implementation hrddp28 n secretarygeneral issued bulletin special measure protection sexual exploitation sexual abuse stsgb200313 applies staff un department programme fund agency prohibiting committing act sexual exploitation sexual abuse", "SentID": 1186 }, { "ParagraphID": 455, - "Paragraph": "The general guide for UN-supported DDR processes is the UN IDDRS. Other internal documents that may be relevant to DDR processes include the following: \\n The UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy (HRDDP) (A\/67\/775-S\/2013\/110) governs the UN\u2019s provision of support to non-UN security forces, which could include the provision of support to national DDR processes if such processes or their programmes are being implemented by security forces, or if there is any repatriation of DDR participants and beneficiaries by security forces. The HRDDP requires UN entities that are contemplating providing support to non-UN security forces to take certain due diligence, compliance and monitoring measures with the aim of ensuring that receiving entities do not commit grave violations of international humanitarian law, international human rights law or refugee law. Where there are substantial grounds for believing that grave violations are occurring or have occurred, involving security forces to which support is being provided by the UN, the UN shall intercede with the competent authorities to bring such violations to an end and\/or seek accountability in respect of them. For further information, please refer to the Guidance Note for the implementation of the HRDDP.28 \\n The Secretary-General issued a bulletin on special measures for protection from sexual exploitation and sexual abuse (ST\/SGB\/2003\/13), which applies to the staff of all UN departments, programmes, funds and agencies, prohibiting them from committing acts of sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. In line with the UN Staff Regulations and Rules, sexual exploitation and sexual abuse constitute acts of serious misconduct and are therefore grounds for disciplinary measures, including dismissal. Further, UN staff are obliged to create and maintain an environment that prevents sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. Managers at all levels have a particular responsibility to support and develop systems that maintain this environment.", + "Paragraph": "The general guide for UN-supported DDR processes is the UN IDDRS. Other internal documents that may be relevant to DDR processes include the following: \n The UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy (HRDDP) (A\/67\/775-S\/2013\/110) governs the UN\u2019s provision of support to non-UN security forces, which could include the provision of support to national DDR processes if such processes or their programmes are being implemented by security forces, or if there is any repatriation of DDR participants and beneficiaries by security forces. The HRDDP requires UN entities that are contemplating providing support to non-UN security forces to take certain due diligence, compliance and monitoring measures with the aim of ensuring that receiving entities do not commit grave violations of international humanitarian law, international human rights law or refugee law. Where there are substantial grounds for believing that grave violations are occurring or have occurred, involving security forces to which support is being provided by the UN, the UN shall intercede with the competent authorities to bring such violations to an end and\/or seek accountability in respect of them. For further information, please refer to the Guidance Note for the implementation of the HRDDP.28 \n The Secretary-General issued a bulletin on special measures for protection from sexual exploitation and sexual abuse (ST\/SGB\/2003\/13), which applies to the staff of all UN departments, programmes, funds and agencies, prohibiting them from committing acts of sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. In line with the UN Staff Regulations and Rules, sexual exploitation and sexual abuse constitute acts of serious misconduct and are therefore grounds for disciplinary measures, including dismissal. Further, UN staff are obliged to create and maintain an environment that prevents sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. Managers at all levels have a particular responsibility to support and develop systems that maintain this environment.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -21385,7 +21385,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 455, - "Paragraph": "The general guide for UN-supported DDR processes is the UN IDDRS. Other internal documents that may be relevant to DDR processes include the following: \\n The UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy (HRDDP) (A\/67\/775-S\/2013\/110) governs the UN\u2019s provision of support to non-UN security forces, which could include the provision of support to national DDR processes if such processes or their programmes are being implemented by security forces, or if there is any repatriation of DDR participants and beneficiaries by security forces. The HRDDP requires UN entities that are contemplating providing support to non-UN security forces to take certain due diligence, compliance and monitoring measures with the aim of ensuring that receiving entities do not commit grave violations of international humanitarian law, international human rights law or refugee law. Where there are substantial grounds for believing that grave violations are occurring or have occurred, involving security forces to which support is being provided by the UN, the UN shall intercede with the competent authorities to bring such violations to an end and\/or seek accountability in respect of them. For further information, please refer to the Guidance Note for the implementation of the HRDDP.28 \\n The Secretary-General issued a bulletin on special measures for protection from sexual exploitation and sexual abuse (ST\/SGB\/2003\/13), which applies to the staff of all UN departments, programmes, funds and agencies, prohibiting them from committing acts of sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. In line with the UN Staff Regulations and Rules, sexual exploitation and sexual abuse constitute acts of serious misconduct and are therefore grounds for disciplinary measures, including dismissal. Further, UN staff are obliged to create and maintain an environment that prevents sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. Managers at all levels have a particular responsibility to support and develop systems that maintain this environment.", + "Paragraph": "The general guide for UN-supported DDR processes is the UN IDDRS. Other internal documents that may be relevant to DDR processes include the following: \n The UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy (HRDDP) (A\/67\/775-S\/2013\/110) governs the UN\u2019s provision of support to non-UN security forces, which could include the provision of support to national DDR processes if such processes or their programmes are being implemented by security forces, or if there is any repatriation of DDR participants and beneficiaries by security forces. The HRDDP requires UN entities that are contemplating providing support to non-UN security forces to take certain due diligence, compliance and monitoring measures with the aim of ensuring that receiving entities do not commit grave violations of international humanitarian law, international human rights law or refugee law. Where there are substantial grounds for believing that grave violations are occurring or have occurred, involving security forces to which support is being provided by the UN, the UN shall intercede with the competent authorities to bring such violations to an end and\/or seek accountability in respect of them. For further information, please refer to the Guidance Note for the implementation of the HRDDP.28 \n The Secretary-General issued a bulletin on special measures for protection from sexual exploitation and sexual abuse (ST\/SGB\/2003\/13), which applies to the staff of all UN departments, programmes, funds and agencies, prohibiting them from committing acts of sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. In line with the UN Staff Regulations and Rules, sexual exploitation and sexual abuse constitute acts of serious misconduct and are therefore grounds for disciplinary measures, including dismissal. Further, UN staff are obliged to create and maintain an environment that prevents sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. Managers at all levels have a particular responsibility to support and develop systems that maintain this environment.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -21403,7 +21403,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 455, - "Paragraph": "The general guide for UN-supported DDR processes is the UN IDDRS. Other internal documents that may be relevant to DDR processes include the following: \\n The UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy (HRDDP) (A\/67\/775-S\/2013\/110) governs the UN\u2019s provision of support to non-UN security forces, which could include the provision of support to national DDR processes if such processes or their programmes are being implemented by security forces, or if there is any repatriation of DDR participants and beneficiaries by security forces. The HRDDP requires UN entities that are contemplating providing support to non-UN security forces to take certain due diligence, compliance and monitoring measures with the aim of ensuring that receiving entities do not commit grave violations of international humanitarian law, international human rights law or refugee law. Where there are substantial grounds for believing that grave violations are occurring or have occurred, involving security forces to which support is being provided by the UN, the UN shall intercede with the competent authorities to bring such violations to an end and\/or seek accountability in respect of them. For further information, please refer to the Guidance Note for the implementation of the HRDDP.28 \\n The Secretary-General issued a bulletin on special measures for protection from sexual exploitation and sexual abuse (ST\/SGB\/2003\/13), which applies to the staff of all UN departments, programmes, funds and agencies, prohibiting them from committing acts of sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. In line with the UN Staff Regulations and Rules, sexual exploitation and sexual abuse constitute acts of serious misconduct and are therefore grounds for disciplinary measures, including dismissal. Further, UN staff are obliged to create and maintain an environment that prevents sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. Managers at all levels have a particular responsibility to support and develop systems that maintain this environment.", + "Paragraph": "The general guide for UN-supported DDR processes is the UN IDDRS. Other internal documents that may be relevant to DDR processes include the following: \n The UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy (HRDDP) (A\/67\/775-S\/2013\/110) governs the UN\u2019s provision of support to non-UN security forces, which could include the provision of support to national DDR processes if such processes or their programmes are being implemented by security forces, or if there is any repatriation of DDR participants and beneficiaries by security forces. The HRDDP requires UN entities that are contemplating providing support to non-UN security forces to take certain due diligence, compliance and monitoring measures with the aim of ensuring that receiving entities do not commit grave violations of international humanitarian law, international human rights law or refugee law. Where there are substantial grounds for believing that grave violations are occurring or have occurred, involving security forces to which support is being provided by the UN, the UN shall intercede with the competent authorities to bring such violations to an end and\/or seek accountability in respect of them. For further information, please refer to the Guidance Note for the implementation of the HRDDP.28 \n The Secretary-General issued a bulletin on special measures for protection from sexual exploitation and sexual abuse (ST\/SGB\/2003\/13), which applies to the staff of all UN departments, programmes, funds and agencies, prohibiting them from committing acts of sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. In line with the UN Staff Regulations and Rules, sexual exploitation and sexual abuse constitute acts of serious misconduct and are therefore grounds for disciplinary measures, including dismissal. Further, UN staff are obliged to create and maintain an environment that prevents sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. Managers at all levels have a particular responsibility to support and develop systems that maintain this environment.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -21421,7 +21421,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 456, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of and follow relevant internal rules, policies and procedures at all stages of the DDR process. \\n DDR practitioners in management positions shall ensure that team members are kept up to date on the most recent developments in the internal rules, policies and procedures, and that managers and team members complete all necessary training and courses", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware of and follow relevant internal rules, policies and procedures at all stages of the DDR process. \n DDR practitioners in management positions shall ensure that team members are kept up to date on the most recent developments in the internal rules, policies and procedures, and that managers and team members complete all necessary training and courses", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -21432,14 +21432,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.4 Internal rules, policies and procedures", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of and follow relevant internal rules, policies and procedures at all stages of the DDR process.", + "Sentence": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware of and follow relevant internal rules, policies and procedures at all stages of the DDR process.", "newParagraph": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner aware follow relevant internal rule policy procedure stage ddr process n ddr practitioner management position shall ensure team member kept date recent development internal rule policy procedure manager team member complete necessary training course", "ProcessedSent": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner aware follow relevant internal rule policy procedure stage ddr process", "SentID": 1190 }, { "ParagraphID": 456, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should be aware of and follow relevant internal rules, policies and procedures at all stages of the DDR process. \\n DDR practitioners in management positions shall ensure that team members are kept up to date on the most recent developments in the internal rules, policies and procedures, and that managers and team members complete all necessary training and courses", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should be aware of and follow relevant internal rules, policies and procedures at all stages of the DDR process. \n DDR practitioners in management positions shall ensure that team members are kept up to date on the most recent developments in the internal rules, policies and procedures, and that managers and team members complete all necessary training and courses", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -21450,14 +21450,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.4 Internal rules, policies and procedures", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n DDR practitioners in management positions shall ensure that team members are kept up to date on the most recent developments in the internal rules, policies and procedures, and that managers and team members complete all necessary training and courses", + "Sentence": "\n DDR practitioners in management positions shall ensure that team members are kept up to date on the most recent developments in the internal rules, policies and procedures, and that managers and team members complete all necessary training and courses", "newParagraph": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner aware follow relevant internal rule policy procedure stage ddr process n ddr practitioner management position shall ensure team member kept date recent development internal rule policy procedure manager team member complete necessary training course", "ProcessedSent": "n ddr practitioner management position shall ensure team member kept date recent development internal rule policy procedure manager team member complete necessary training course", "SentID": 1191 }, { "ParagraphID": 457, - "Paragraph": "Red line \\n Violation of the UN internal rules, policies and procedures could lead to harm to the UN, and may lead to disciplinary measures for DDR practitioners.", + "Paragraph": "Red line \n Violation of the UN internal rules, policies and procedures could lead to harm to the UN, and may lead to disciplinary measures for DDR practitioners.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -21468,7 +21468,7 @@ "Heading2": "4.4 Internal rules, policies and procedures", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Red line \\n Violation of the UN internal rules, policies and procedures could lead to harm to the UN, and may lead to disciplinary measures for DDR practitioners.", + "Sentence": "Red line \n Violation of the UN internal rules, policies and procedures could lead to harm to the UN, and may lead to disciplinary measures for DDR practitioners.", "newParagraph": "red line n violation un internal rule policy procedure could lead harm un may lead disciplinary measure ddr practitioner", "ProcessedSent": "red line n violation un internal rule policy procedure could lead harm un may lead disciplinary measure ddr practitioner", "SentID": 1192 @@ -21799,7 +21799,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 466, - "Paragraph": "Any request for the production or disclosure of UN documents that are not in the public domain should be by way of an official request from the Member State Government to the UN. The sharing of information is regulated by the Secretary-General\u2019s bulletin on information sensitivity, classification, and handling (ST\/SGB\/2007\/6). Pursuant to this bulletin, documents that are responsive to a request shall be reviewed to verify that they do not contain any sensitive information. \u2018Sensitive\u2019 information means: \\n Information received from third parties under an expectation of confidentiality; \\n Information whose disclosure would endanger the safety or security of any individual; \\n Information whose disclosure would violate any individual\u2019s rights or invade his or her privacy; \\n Information whose disclosure is likely to endanger the security of a Member State; \\n Information whose disclosure would prejudice the security or proper conduct of any operation or activity of the UN; \\n Information covered by legal privilege or relating to internal investigations; \\n Information whose disclosure would undermine the Organization\u2019s free and independent decision-making process; \\n Commercial information whose disclosure would harm either the financial interests of the UN or those of other parties involved; or \\n Other kinds of information, which because of their content or the circumstances of their creation or communication shall be deemed confidential.", + "Paragraph": "Any request for the production or disclosure of UN documents that are not in the public domain should be by way of an official request from the Member State Government to the UN. The sharing of information is regulated by the Secretary-General\u2019s bulletin on information sensitivity, classification, and handling (ST\/SGB\/2007\/6). Pursuant to this bulletin, documents that are responsive to a request shall be reviewed to verify that they do not contain any sensitive information. \u2018Sensitive\u2019 information means: \n Information received from third parties under an expectation of confidentiality; \n Information whose disclosure would endanger the safety or security of any individual; \n Information whose disclosure would violate any individual\u2019s rights or invade his or her privacy; \n Information whose disclosure is likely to endanger the security of a Member State; \n Information whose disclosure would prejudice the security or proper conduct of any operation or activity of the UN; \n Information covered by legal privilege or relating to internal investigations; \n Information whose disclosure would undermine the Organization\u2019s free and independent decision-making process; \n Commercial information whose disclosure would harm either the financial interests of the UN or those of other parties involved; or \n Other kinds of information, which because of their content or the circumstances of their creation or communication shall be deemed confidential.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -21817,7 +21817,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 466, - "Paragraph": "Any request for the production or disclosure of UN documents that are not in the public domain should be by way of an official request from the Member State Government to the UN. The sharing of information is regulated by the Secretary-General\u2019s bulletin on information sensitivity, classification, and handling (ST\/SGB\/2007\/6). Pursuant to this bulletin, documents that are responsive to a request shall be reviewed to verify that they do not contain any sensitive information. \u2018Sensitive\u2019 information means: \\n Information received from third parties under an expectation of confidentiality; \\n Information whose disclosure would endanger the safety or security of any individual; \\n Information whose disclosure would violate any individual\u2019s rights or invade his or her privacy; \\n Information whose disclosure is likely to endanger the security of a Member State; \\n Information whose disclosure would prejudice the security or proper conduct of any operation or activity of the UN; \\n Information covered by legal privilege or relating to internal investigations; \\n Information whose disclosure would undermine the Organization\u2019s free and independent decision-making process; \\n Commercial information whose disclosure would harm either the financial interests of the UN or those of other parties involved; or \\n Other kinds of information, which because of their content or the circumstances of their creation or communication shall be deemed confidential.", + "Paragraph": "Any request for the production or disclosure of UN documents that are not in the public domain should be by way of an official request from the Member State Government to the UN. The sharing of information is regulated by the Secretary-General\u2019s bulletin on information sensitivity, classification, and handling (ST\/SGB\/2007\/6). Pursuant to this bulletin, documents that are responsive to a request shall be reviewed to verify that they do not contain any sensitive information. \u2018Sensitive\u2019 information means: \n Information received from third parties under an expectation of confidentiality; \n Information whose disclosure would endanger the safety or security of any individual; \n Information whose disclosure would violate any individual\u2019s rights or invade his or her privacy; \n Information whose disclosure is likely to endanger the security of a Member State; \n Information whose disclosure would prejudice the security or proper conduct of any operation or activity of the UN; \n Information covered by legal privilege or relating to internal investigations; \n Information whose disclosure would undermine the Organization\u2019s free and independent decision-making process; \n Commercial information whose disclosure would harm either the financial interests of the UN or those of other parties involved; or \n Other kinds of information, which because of their content or the circumstances of their creation or communication shall be deemed confidential.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -21835,7 +21835,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 466, - "Paragraph": "Any request for the production or disclosure of UN documents that are not in the public domain should be by way of an official request from the Member State Government to the UN. The sharing of information is regulated by the Secretary-General\u2019s bulletin on information sensitivity, classification, and handling (ST\/SGB\/2007\/6). Pursuant to this bulletin, documents that are responsive to a request shall be reviewed to verify that they do not contain any sensitive information. \u2018Sensitive\u2019 information means: \\n Information received from third parties under an expectation of confidentiality; \\n Information whose disclosure would endanger the safety or security of any individual; \\n Information whose disclosure would violate any individual\u2019s rights or invade his or her privacy; \\n Information whose disclosure is likely to endanger the security of a Member State; \\n Information whose disclosure would prejudice the security or proper conduct of any operation or activity of the UN; \\n Information covered by legal privilege or relating to internal investigations; \\n Information whose disclosure would undermine the Organization\u2019s free and independent decision-making process; \\n Commercial information whose disclosure would harm either the financial interests of the UN or those of other parties involved; or \\n Other kinds of information, which because of their content or the circumstances of their creation or communication shall be deemed confidential.", + "Paragraph": "Any request for the production or disclosure of UN documents that are not in the public domain should be by way of an official request from the Member State Government to the UN. The sharing of information is regulated by the Secretary-General\u2019s bulletin on information sensitivity, classification, and handling (ST\/SGB\/2007\/6). Pursuant to this bulletin, documents that are responsive to a request shall be reviewed to verify that they do not contain any sensitive information. \u2018Sensitive\u2019 information means: \n Information received from third parties under an expectation of confidentiality; \n Information whose disclosure would endanger the safety or security of any individual; \n Information whose disclosure would violate any individual\u2019s rights or invade his or her privacy; \n Information whose disclosure is likely to endanger the security of a Member State; \n Information whose disclosure would prejudice the security or proper conduct of any operation or activity of the UN; \n Information covered by legal privilege or relating to internal investigations; \n Information whose disclosure would undermine the Organization\u2019s free and independent decision-making process; \n Commercial information whose disclosure would harm either the financial interests of the UN or those of other parties involved; or \n Other kinds of information, which because of their content or the circumstances of their creation or communication shall be deemed confidential.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -21853,7 +21853,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 466, - "Paragraph": "Any request for the production or disclosure of UN documents that are not in the public domain should be by way of an official request from the Member State Government to the UN. The sharing of information is regulated by the Secretary-General\u2019s bulletin on information sensitivity, classification, and handling (ST\/SGB\/2007\/6). Pursuant to this bulletin, documents that are responsive to a request shall be reviewed to verify that they do not contain any sensitive information. \u2018Sensitive\u2019 information means: \\n Information received from third parties under an expectation of confidentiality; \\n Information whose disclosure would endanger the safety or security of any individual; \\n Information whose disclosure would violate any individual\u2019s rights or invade his or her privacy; \\n Information whose disclosure is likely to endanger the security of a Member State; \\n Information whose disclosure would prejudice the security or proper conduct of any operation or activity of the UN; \\n Information covered by legal privilege or relating to internal investigations; \\n Information whose disclosure would undermine the Organization\u2019s free and independent decision-making process; \\n Commercial information whose disclosure would harm either the financial interests of the UN or those of other parties involved; or \\n Other kinds of information, which because of their content or the circumstances of their creation or communication shall be deemed confidential.", + "Paragraph": "Any request for the production or disclosure of UN documents that are not in the public domain should be by way of an official request from the Member State Government to the UN. The sharing of information is regulated by the Secretary-General\u2019s bulletin on information sensitivity, classification, and handling (ST\/SGB\/2007\/6). Pursuant to this bulletin, documents that are responsive to a request shall be reviewed to verify that they do not contain any sensitive information. \u2018Sensitive\u2019 information means: \n Information received from third parties under an expectation of confidentiality; \n Information whose disclosure would endanger the safety or security of any individual; \n Information whose disclosure would violate any individual\u2019s rights or invade his or her privacy; \n Information whose disclosure is likely to endanger the security of a Member State; \n Information whose disclosure would prejudice the security or proper conduct of any operation or activity of the UN; \n Information covered by legal privilege or relating to internal investigations; \n Information whose disclosure would undermine the Organization\u2019s free and independent decision-making process; \n Commercial information whose disclosure would harm either the financial interests of the UN or those of other parties involved; or \n Other kinds of information, which because of their content or the circumstances of their creation or communication shall be deemed confidential.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -21864,7 +21864,7 @@ "Heading2": "4.5 Status, privileges and immunities", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\u2018Sensitive\u2019 information means: \\n Information received from third parties under an expectation of confidentiality; \\n Information whose disclosure would endanger the safety or security of any individual; \\n Information whose disclosure would violate any individual\u2019s rights or invade his or her privacy; \\n Information whose disclosure is likely to endanger the security of a Member State; \\n Information whose disclosure would prejudice the security or proper conduct of any operation or activity of the UN; \\n Information covered by legal privilege or relating to internal investigations; \\n Information whose disclosure would undermine the Organization\u2019s free and independent decision-making process; \\n Commercial information whose disclosure would harm either the financial interests of the UN or those of other parties involved; or \\n Other kinds of information, which because of their content or the circumstances of their creation or communication shall be deemed confidential.", + "Sentence": "\u2018Sensitive\u2019 information means: \n Information received from third parties under an expectation of confidentiality; \n Information whose disclosure would endanger the safety or security of any individual; \n Information whose disclosure would violate any individual\u2019s rights or invade his or her privacy; \n Information whose disclosure is likely to endanger the security of a Member State; \n Information whose disclosure would prejudice the security or proper conduct of any operation or activity of the UN; \n Information covered by legal privilege or relating to internal investigations; \n Information whose disclosure would undermine the Organization\u2019s free and independent decision-making process; \n Commercial information whose disclosure would harm either the financial interests of the UN or those of other parties involved; or \n Other kinds of information, which because of their content or the circumstances of their creation or communication shall be deemed confidential.", "newParagraph": "request production disclosure un document public domain way official request member state government un sharing information regulated secretarygeneral bulletin information sensitivity classification handling stsgb20076 pursuant bulletin document responsive request shall reviewed verify contain sensitive information sensitive information mean n information received third party expectation confidentiality n information whose disclosure would endanger safety security individual n information whose disclosure would violate individual right invade privacy n information whose disclosure likely endanger security member state n information whose disclosure would prejudice security proper conduct operation activity un n information covered legal privilege relating internal investigation n information whose disclosure would undermine organization free independent decisionmaking process n commercial information whose disclosure would harm either financial interest un party involved n kind information content circumstance creation communication shall deemed confidential", "ProcessedSent": " sensitive information mean n information received third party expectation confidentiality n information whose disclosure would endanger safety security individual n information whose disclosure would violate individual right invade privacy n information whose disclosure likely endanger security member state n information whose disclosure would prejudice security proper conduct operation activity un n information covered legal privilege relating internal investigation n information whose disclosure would undermine organization free independent decisionmaking process n commercial information whose disclosure would harm either financial interest un party involved n kind information content circumstance creation communication shall deemed confidential", "SentID": 1214 @@ -21943,7 +21943,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 470, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should seek legal advice from the relevant legal adviser of the mission or field presence if there are requests for the production or disclosure of documents or information produced by or in the possession of the UN. \\n DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if asked to provide testimony or participate in an interview or interrogation by national authorities.", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should seek legal advice from the relevant legal adviser of the mission or field presence if there are requests for the production or disclosure of documents or information produced by or in the possession of the UN. \n DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if asked to provide testimony or participate in an interview or interrogation by national authorities.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -21954,14 +21954,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.5 Status, privileges and immunities", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should seek legal advice from the relevant legal adviser of the mission or field presence if there are requests for the production or disclosure of documents or information produced by or in the possession of the UN.", + "Sentence": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should seek legal advice from the relevant legal adviser of the mission or field presence if there are requests for the production or disclosure of documents or information produced by or in the possession of the UN.", "newParagraph": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner seek legal advice relevant legal adviser mission field presence request production disclosure document information produced possession un n ddr practitioner seek legal advice asked provide testimony participate interview interrogation national authority", "ProcessedSent": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner seek legal advice relevant legal adviser mission field presence request production disclosure document information produced possession un", "SentID": 1219 }, { "ParagraphID": 470, - "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \\n DDR practitioners should seek legal advice from the relevant legal adviser of the mission or field presence if there are requests for the production or disclosure of documents or information produced by or in the possession of the UN. \\n DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if asked to provide testimony or participate in an interview or interrogation by national authorities.", + "Paragraph": "Specific guiding principles \n DDR practitioners should seek legal advice from the relevant legal adviser of the mission or field presence if there are requests for the production or disclosure of documents or information produced by or in the possession of the UN. \n DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if asked to provide testimony or participate in an interview or interrogation by national authorities.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -21972,14 +21972,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.5 Status, privileges and immunities", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if asked to provide testimony or participate in an interview or interrogation by national authorities.", + "Sentence": "\n DDR practitioners should seek legal advice if asked to provide testimony or participate in an interview or interrogation by national authorities.", "newParagraph": "specific guiding principle n ddr practitioner seek legal advice relevant legal adviser mission field presence request production disclosure document information produced possession un n ddr practitioner seek legal advice asked provide testimony participate interview interrogation national authority", "ProcessedSent": "n ddr practitioner seek legal advice asked provide testimony participate interview interrogation national authority", "SentID": 1220 }, { "ParagraphID": 471, - "Paragraph": "Red lines \\n DDR practitioners shall not produce or disclose any documents or information produced by or in the possession of the UN that are not in the public domain without first seeking legal advice. \\n DDR practitioners shall not provide testimony to or participate in any interview or interrogation by the State authorities without first seeking legal advice and receiving authorization to do so (which may require a waiver of immunity", + "Paragraph": "Red lines \n DDR practitioners shall not produce or disclose any documents or information produced by or in the possession of the UN that are not in the public domain without first seeking legal advice. \n DDR practitioners shall not provide testimony to or participate in any interview or interrogation by the State authorities without first seeking legal advice and receiving authorization to do so (which may require a waiver of immunity", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -21990,14 +21990,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.5 Status, privileges and immunities", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Red lines \\n DDR practitioners shall not produce or disclose any documents or information produced by or in the possession of the UN that are not in the public domain without first seeking legal advice.", + "Sentence": "Red lines \n DDR practitioners shall not produce or disclose any documents or information produced by or in the possession of the UN that are not in the public domain without first seeking legal advice.", "newParagraph": "red line n ddr practitioner shall produce disclose document information produced possession un public domain without first seeking legal advice n ddr practitioner shall provide testimony participate interview interrogation state authority without first seeking legal advice receiving authorization may require waiver immunity", "ProcessedSent": "red line n ddr practitioner shall produce disclose document information produced possession un public domain without first seeking legal advice", "SentID": 1221 }, { "ParagraphID": 471, - "Paragraph": "Red lines \\n DDR practitioners shall not produce or disclose any documents or information produced by or in the possession of the UN that are not in the public domain without first seeking legal advice. \\n DDR practitioners shall not provide testimony to or participate in any interview or interrogation by the State authorities without first seeking legal advice and receiving authorization to do so (which may require a waiver of immunity", + "Paragraph": "Red lines \n DDR practitioners shall not produce or disclose any documents or information produced by or in the possession of the UN that are not in the public domain without first seeking legal advice. \n DDR practitioners shall not provide testimony to or participate in any interview or interrogation by the State authorities without first seeking legal advice and receiving authorization to do so (which may require a waiver of immunity", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22008,14 +22008,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.5 Status, privileges and immunities", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n DDR practitioners shall not provide testimony to or participate in any interview or interrogation by the State authorities without first seeking legal advice and receiving authorization to do so (which may require a waiver of immunity", + "Sentence": "\n DDR practitioners shall not provide testimony to or participate in any interview or interrogation by the State authorities without first seeking legal advice and receiving authorization to do so (which may require a waiver of immunity", "newParagraph": "red line n ddr practitioner shall produce disclose document information produced possession un public domain without first seeking legal advice n ddr practitioner shall provide testimony participate interview interrogation state authority without first seeking legal advice receiving authorization may require waiver immunity", "ProcessedSent": "n ddr practitioner shall provide testimony participate interview interrogation state authority without first seeking legal advice receiving authorization may require waiver immunity", "SentID": 1222 }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22033,7 +22033,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22044,14 +22044,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea.", + "Sentence": "\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea.", "newParagraph": "1 source include among others international law source instrument well internal rule policy procedure n2 specifically first second geneva convention relate respectively improvement condition 1 wounded sick armed force field 2 condition wounded sick shipwrecked member armed force sea third geneva convention relates treatment prisoner war fourth geneva convention relates protection civilian time war including occupied territory additional protocol ii international treaty supplement geneva convention 1949 significantly improve legal protection covering civilian wounded additional protocol concern international armed conflict involving least two country additional protocol ii first international treaty applies solely civil war armed conflict within state set restriction use force conflict n3 article 31 1951 convention n4 article 12a 1951 convention n5 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 7 n6 human right committee general comment 36 2018 article 6 international covenant civil political right right life 30 october 2018 para 30 31 human right committee general comment 20 1992 article 7 international covenant civil political right prohibition torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 10 march 1992 para 9 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 18 19 n7 preamble rome statute icc sixth recital n8 article 6 rome statute icc genocide n9 article 7 rome statute icc crime humanity n10 article 8 rome statute icc war crime n11 article 8 bi rome statute icc crime aggression n12 see convention prevention punishment crime genocide 9 december 1948 article 1 genocide convention provides contracting party confirm genocide whether committed time peace time war crime international law undertake prevent punish n13 see international law commission draft article crime humanity n14 example international criminal tribunal rwanda international tribunal former yugoslavia international residual mechanism criminal tribunal n15 example special court sierra leone residual special court sierra leone extraordinary chamber court cambodia n16 example special criminal court central african republic n17 consolidated sanction list includes individual entity subject sanction measure imposed security council httpswwwunorgscsuborgensanctionsunscconsolidatedlist n18 httpswwwunorgscctcresourcesinternationallegalinstruments httpwwwunorgen counterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n19 security council resolution 1373 2001 operative para 2e security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 19 n20 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 6 b c security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 n21 see resolution 2341 2017 n22 see resolution 2331 2016 n23 httpwwwunorgencounterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n24 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 4 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 18 30 n25 security council resolution 2349 2017 operative para 32 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 30 31 36 ares72282 para 39 n26 httpswwwunorgsecuritycouncilsanctionsinformation n27 one example description un security council group listed un security council committee established pursuant resolution 751 1992 1907 2009 concerning somalia terrorist group mandate united nation assistance mission somalia n28 httphrbaportalorgwpcontentfilesinteragencyhrddpguidancenote2015pdf n29 article 105 para 1 2 n30 convention privilege immunity un sect 20 23 n31 convention privilege immunity specialized agency sect 22 n32 convention privilege immunity un sect 21 responsibility generally reflected un host country agreement", "ProcessedSent": "n2 specifically first second geneva convention relate respectively improvement condition 1 wounded sick armed force field 2 condition wounded sick shipwrecked member armed force sea", "SentID": 1224 }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22069,7 +22069,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22087,7 +22087,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22105,7 +22105,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22123,7 +22123,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22141,7 +22141,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22152,14 +22152,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention.", + "Sentence": "\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention.", "newParagraph": "1 source include among others international law source instrument well internal rule policy procedure n2 specifically first second geneva convention relate respectively improvement condition 1 wounded sick armed force field 2 condition wounded sick shipwrecked member armed force sea third geneva convention relates treatment prisoner war fourth geneva convention relates protection civilian time war including occupied territory additional protocol ii international treaty supplement geneva convention 1949 significantly improve legal protection covering civilian wounded additional protocol concern international armed conflict involving least two country additional protocol ii first international treaty applies solely civil war armed conflict within state set restriction use force conflict n3 article 31 1951 convention n4 article 12a 1951 convention n5 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 7 n6 human right committee general comment 36 2018 article 6 international covenant civil political right right life 30 october 2018 para 30 31 human right committee general comment 20 1992 article 7 international covenant civil political right prohibition torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 10 march 1992 para 9 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 18 19 n7 preamble rome statute icc sixth recital n8 article 6 rome statute icc genocide n9 article 7 rome statute icc crime humanity n10 article 8 rome statute icc war crime n11 article 8 bi rome statute icc crime aggression n12 see convention prevention punishment crime genocide 9 december 1948 article 1 genocide convention provides contracting party confirm genocide whether committed time peace time war crime international law undertake prevent punish n13 see international law commission draft article crime humanity n14 example international criminal tribunal rwanda international tribunal former yugoslavia international residual mechanism criminal tribunal n15 example special court sierra leone residual special court sierra leone extraordinary chamber court cambodia n16 example special criminal court central african republic n17 consolidated sanction list includes individual entity subject sanction measure imposed security council httpswwwunorgscsuborgensanctionsunscconsolidatedlist n18 httpswwwunorgscctcresourcesinternationallegalinstruments httpwwwunorgen counterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n19 security council resolution 1373 2001 operative para 2e security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 19 n20 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 6 b c security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 n21 see resolution 2341 2017 n22 see resolution 2331 2016 n23 httpwwwunorgencounterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n24 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 4 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 18 30 n25 security council resolution 2349 2017 operative para 32 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 30 31 36 ares72282 para 39 n26 httpswwwunorgsecuritycouncilsanctionsinformation n27 one example description un security council group listed un security council committee established pursuant resolution 751 1992 1907 2009 concerning somalia terrorist group mandate united nation assistance mission somalia n28 httphrbaportalorgwpcontentfilesinteragencyhrddpguidancenote2015pdf n29 article 105 para 1 2 n30 convention privilege immunity un sect 20 23 n31 convention privilege immunity specialized agency sect 22 n32 convention privilege immunity un sect 21 responsibility generally reflected un host country agreement", "ProcessedSent": "n3 article 31 1951 convention", "SentID": 1230 }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22170,14 +22170,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention.", + "Sentence": "\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention.", "newParagraph": "1 source include among others international law source instrument well internal rule policy procedure n2 specifically first second geneva convention relate respectively improvement condition 1 wounded sick armed force field 2 condition wounded sick shipwrecked member armed force sea third geneva convention relates treatment prisoner war fourth geneva convention relates protection civilian time war including occupied territory additional protocol ii international treaty supplement geneva convention 1949 significantly improve legal protection covering civilian wounded additional protocol concern international armed conflict involving least two country additional protocol ii first international treaty applies solely civil war armed conflict within state set restriction use force conflict n3 article 31 1951 convention n4 article 12a 1951 convention n5 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 7 n6 human right committee general comment 36 2018 article 6 international covenant civil political right right life 30 october 2018 para 30 31 human right committee general comment 20 1992 article 7 international covenant civil political right prohibition torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 10 march 1992 para 9 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 18 19 n7 preamble rome statute icc sixth recital n8 article 6 rome statute icc genocide n9 article 7 rome statute icc crime humanity n10 article 8 rome statute icc war crime n11 article 8 bi rome statute icc crime aggression n12 see convention prevention punishment crime genocide 9 december 1948 article 1 genocide convention provides contracting party confirm genocide whether committed time peace time war crime international law undertake prevent punish n13 see international law commission draft article crime humanity n14 example international criminal tribunal rwanda international tribunal former yugoslavia international residual mechanism criminal tribunal n15 example special court sierra leone residual special court sierra leone extraordinary chamber court cambodia n16 example special criminal court central african republic n17 consolidated sanction list includes individual entity subject sanction measure imposed security council httpswwwunorgscsuborgensanctionsunscconsolidatedlist n18 httpswwwunorgscctcresourcesinternationallegalinstruments httpwwwunorgen counterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n19 security council resolution 1373 2001 operative para 2e security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 19 n20 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 6 b c security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 n21 see resolution 2341 2017 n22 see resolution 2331 2016 n23 httpwwwunorgencounterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n24 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 4 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 18 30 n25 security council resolution 2349 2017 operative para 32 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 30 31 36 ares72282 para 39 n26 httpswwwunorgsecuritycouncilsanctionsinformation n27 one example description un security council group listed un security council committee established pursuant resolution 751 1992 1907 2009 concerning somalia terrorist group mandate united nation assistance mission somalia n28 httphrbaportalorgwpcontentfilesinteragencyhrddpguidancenote2015pdf n29 article 105 para 1 2 n30 convention privilege immunity un sect 20 23 n31 convention privilege immunity specialized agency sect 22 n32 convention privilege immunity un sect 21 responsibility generally reflected un host country agreement", "ProcessedSent": "n4 article 12a 1951 convention", "SentID": 1231 }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22188,14 +22188,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7.", + "Sentence": "\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7.", "newParagraph": "1 source include among others international law source instrument well internal rule policy procedure n2 specifically first second geneva convention relate respectively improvement condition 1 wounded sick armed force field 2 condition wounded sick shipwrecked member armed force sea third geneva convention relates treatment prisoner war fourth geneva convention relates protection civilian time war including occupied territory additional protocol ii international treaty supplement geneva convention 1949 significantly improve legal protection covering civilian wounded additional protocol concern international armed conflict involving least two country additional protocol ii first international treaty applies solely civil war armed conflict within state set restriction use force conflict n3 article 31 1951 convention n4 article 12a 1951 convention n5 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 7 n6 human right committee general comment 36 2018 article 6 international covenant civil political right right life 30 october 2018 para 30 31 human right committee general comment 20 1992 article 7 international covenant civil political right prohibition torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 10 march 1992 para 9 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 18 19 n7 preamble rome statute icc sixth recital n8 article 6 rome statute icc genocide n9 article 7 rome statute icc crime humanity n10 article 8 rome statute icc war crime n11 article 8 bi rome statute icc crime aggression n12 see convention prevention punishment crime genocide 9 december 1948 article 1 genocide convention provides contracting party confirm genocide whether committed time peace time war crime international law undertake prevent punish n13 see international law commission draft article crime humanity n14 example international criminal tribunal rwanda international tribunal former yugoslavia international residual mechanism criminal tribunal n15 example special court sierra leone residual special court sierra leone extraordinary chamber court cambodia n16 example special criminal court central african republic n17 consolidated sanction list includes individual entity subject sanction measure imposed security council httpswwwunorgscsuborgensanctionsunscconsolidatedlist n18 httpswwwunorgscctcresourcesinternationallegalinstruments httpwwwunorgen counterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n19 security council resolution 1373 2001 operative para 2e security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 19 n20 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 6 b c security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 n21 see resolution 2341 2017 n22 see resolution 2331 2016 n23 httpwwwunorgencounterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n24 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 4 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 18 30 n25 security council resolution 2349 2017 operative para 32 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 30 31 36 ares72282 para 39 n26 httpswwwunorgsecuritycouncilsanctionsinformation n27 one example description un security council group listed un security council committee established pursuant resolution 751 1992 1907 2009 concerning somalia terrorist group mandate united nation assistance mission somalia n28 httphrbaportalorgwpcontentfilesinteragencyhrddpguidancenote2015pdf n29 article 105 para 1 2 n30 convention privilege immunity un sect 20 23 n31 convention privilege immunity specialized agency sect 22 n32 convention privilege immunity un sect 21 responsibility generally reflected un host country agreement", "ProcessedSent": "n5 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 7", "SentID": 1232 }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22206,14 +22206,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No.", + "Sentence": "\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No.", "newParagraph": "1 source include among others international law source instrument well internal rule policy procedure n2 specifically first second geneva convention relate respectively improvement condition 1 wounded sick armed force field 2 condition wounded sick shipwrecked member armed force sea third geneva convention relates treatment prisoner war fourth geneva convention relates protection civilian time war including occupied territory additional protocol ii international treaty supplement geneva convention 1949 significantly improve legal protection covering civilian wounded additional protocol concern international armed conflict involving least two country additional protocol ii first international treaty applies solely civil war armed conflict within state set restriction use force conflict n3 article 31 1951 convention n4 article 12a 1951 convention n5 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 7 n6 human right committee general comment 36 2018 article 6 international covenant civil political right right life 30 october 2018 para 30 31 human right committee general comment 20 1992 article 7 international covenant civil political right prohibition torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 10 march 1992 para 9 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 18 19 n7 preamble rome statute icc sixth recital n8 article 6 rome statute icc genocide n9 article 7 rome statute icc crime humanity n10 article 8 rome statute icc war crime n11 article 8 bi rome statute icc crime aggression n12 see convention prevention punishment crime genocide 9 december 1948 article 1 genocide convention provides contracting party confirm genocide whether committed time peace time war crime international law undertake prevent punish n13 see international law commission draft article crime humanity n14 example international criminal tribunal rwanda international tribunal former yugoslavia international residual mechanism criminal tribunal n15 example special court sierra leone residual special court sierra leone extraordinary chamber court cambodia n16 example special criminal court central african republic n17 consolidated sanction list includes individual entity subject sanction measure imposed security council httpswwwunorgscsuborgensanctionsunscconsolidatedlist n18 httpswwwunorgscctcresourcesinternationallegalinstruments httpwwwunorgen counterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n19 security council resolution 1373 2001 operative para 2e security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 19 n20 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 6 b c security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 n21 see resolution 2341 2017 n22 see resolution 2331 2016 n23 httpwwwunorgencounterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n24 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 4 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 18 30 n25 security council resolution 2349 2017 operative para 32 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 30 31 36 ares72282 para 39 n26 httpswwwunorgsecuritycouncilsanctionsinformation n27 one example description un security council group listed un security council committee established pursuant resolution 751 1992 1907 2009 concerning somalia terrorist group mandate united nation assistance mission somalia n28 httphrbaportalorgwpcontentfilesinteragencyhrddpguidancenote2015pdf n29 article 105 para 1 2 n30 convention privilege immunity un sect 20 23 n31 convention privilege immunity specialized agency sect 22 n32 convention privilege immunity un sect 21 responsibility generally reflected un host country agreement", "ProcessedSent": "n6 human right committee general comment", "SentID": 1233 }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22231,7 +22231,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22249,7 +22249,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22267,7 +22267,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22285,7 +22285,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22303,7 +22303,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22314,14 +22314,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital.", + "Sentence": "\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital.", "newParagraph": "1 source include among others international law source instrument well internal rule policy procedure n2 specifically first second geneva convention relate respectively improvement condition 1 wounded sick armed force field 2 condition wounded sick shipwrecked member armed force sea third geneva convention relates treatment prisoner war fourth geneva convention relates protection civilian time war including occupied territory additional protocol ii international treaty supplement geneva convention 1949 significantly improve legal protection covering civilian wounded additional protocol concern international armed conflict involving least two country additional protocol ii first international treaty applies solely civil war armed conflict within state set restriction use force conflict n3 article 31 1951 convention n4 article 12a 1951 convention n5 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 7 n6 human right committee general comment 36 2018 article 6 international covenant civil political right right life 30 october 2018 para 30 31 human right committee general comment 20 1992 article 7 international covenant civil political right prohibition torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 10 march 1992 para 9 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 18 19 n7 preamble rome statute icc sixth recital n8 article 6 rome statute icc genocide n9 article 7 rome statute icc crime humanity n10 article 8 rome statute icc war crime n11 article 8 bi rome statute icc crime aggression n12 see convention prevention punishment crime genocide 9 december 1948 article 1 genocide convention provides contracting party confirm genocide whether committed time peace time war crime international law undertake prevent punish n13 see international law commission draft article crime humanity n14 example international criminal tribunal rwanda international tribunal former yugoslavia international residual mechanism criminal tribunal n15 example special court sierra leone residual special court sierra leone extraordinary chamber court cambodia n16 example special criminal court central african republic n17 consolidated sanction list includes individual entity subject sanction measure imposed security council httpswwwunorgscsuborgensanctionsunscconsolidatedlist n18 httpswwwunorgscctcresourcesinternationallegalinstruments httpwwwunorgen counterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n19 security council resolution 1373 2001 operative para 2e security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 19 n20 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 6 b c security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 n21 see resolution 2341 2017 n22 see resolution 2331 2016 n23 httpwwwunorgencounterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n24 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 4 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 18 30 n25 security council resolution 2349 2017 operative para 32 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 30 31 36 ares72282 para 39 n26 httpswwwunorgsecuritycouncilsanctionsinformation n27 one example description un security council group listed un security council committee established pursuant resolution 751 1992 1907 2009 concerning somalia terrorist group mandate united nation assistance mission somalia n28 httphrbaportalorgwpcontentfilesinteragencyhrddpguidancenote2015pdf n29 article 105 para 1 2 n30 convention privilege immunity un sect 20 23 n31 convention privilege immunity specialized agency sect 22 n32 convention privilege immunity un sect 21 responsibility generally reflected un host country agreement", "ProcessedSent": "n7 preamble rome statute icc sixth recital", "SentID": 1239 }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22332,14 +22332,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide.", + "Sentence": "\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide.", "newParagraph": "1 source include among others international law source instrument well internal rule policy procedure n2 specifically first second geneva convention relate respectively improvement condition 1 wounded sick armed force field 2 condition wounded sick shipwrecked member armed force sea third geneva convention relates treatment prisoner war fourth geneva convention relates protection civilian time war including occupied territory additional protocol ii international treaty supplement geneva convention 1949 significantly improve legal protection covering civilian wounded additional protocol concern international armed conflict involving least two country additional protocol ii first international treaty applies solely civil war armed conflict within state set restriction use force conflict n3 article 31 1951 convention n4 article 12a 1951 convention n5 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 7 n6 human right committee general comment 36 2018 article 6 international covenant civil political right right life 30 october 2018 para 30 31 human right committee general comment 20 1992 article 7 international covenant civil political right prohibition torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 10 march 1992 para 9 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 18 19 n7 preamble rome statute icc sixth recital n8 article 6 rome statute icc genocide n9 article 7 rome statute icc crime humanity n10 article 8 rome statute icc war crime n11 article 8 bi rome statute icc crime aggression n12 see convention prevention punishment crime genocide 9 december 1948 article 1 genocide convention provides contracting party confirm genocide whether committed time peace time war crime international law undertake prevent punish n13 see international law commission draft article crime humanity n14 example international criminal tribunal rwanda international tribunal former yugoslavia international residual mechanism criminal tribunal n15 example special court sierra leone residual special court sierra leone extraordinary chamber court cambodia n16 example special criminal court central african republic n17 consolidated sanction list includes individual entity subject sanction measure imposed security council httpswwwunorgscsuborgensanctionsunscconsolidatedlist n18 httpswwwunorgscctcresourcesinternationallegalinstruments httpwwwunorgen counterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n19 security council resolution 1373 2001 operative para 2e security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 19 n20 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 6 b c security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 n21 see resolution 2341 2017 n22 see resolution 2331 2016 n23 httpwwwunorgencounterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n24 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 4 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 18 30 n25 security council resolution 2349 2017 operative para 32 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 30 31 36 ares72282 para 39 n26 httpswwwunorgsecuritycouncilsanctionsinformation n27 one example description un security council group listed un security council committee established pursuant resolution 751 1992 1907 2009 concerning somalia terrorist group mandate united nation assistance mission somalia n28 httphrbaportalorgwpcontentfilesinteragencyhrddpguidancenote2015pdf n29 article 105 para 1 2 n30 convention privilege immunity un sect 20 23 n31 convention privilege immunity specialized agency sect 22 n32 convention privilege immunity un sect 21 responsibility generally reflected un host country agreement", "ProcessedSent": "n8 article 6 rome statute icc genocide", "SentID": 1240 }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22350,14 +22350,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity.", + "Sentence": "\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity.", "newParagraph": "1 source include among others international law source instrument well internal rule policy procedure n2 specifically first second geneva convention relate respectively improvement condition 1 wounded sick armed force field 2 condition wounded sick shipwrecked member armed force sea third geneva convention relates treatment prisoner war fourth geneva convention relates protection civilian time war including occupied territory additional protocol ii international treaty supplement geneva convention 1949 significantly improve legal protection covering civilian wounded additional protocol concern international armed conflict involving least two country additional protocol ii first international treaty applies solely civil war armed conflict within state set restriction use force conflict n3 article 31 1951 convention n4 article 12a 1951 convention n5 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 7 n6 human right committee general comment 36 2018 article 6 international covenant civil political right right life 30 october 2018 para 30 31 human right committee general comment 20 1992 article 7 international covenant civil political right prohibition torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 10 march 1992 para 9 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 18 19 n7 preamble rome statute icc sixth recital n8 article 6 rome statute icc genocide n9 article 7 rome statute icc crime humanity n10 article 8 rome statute icc war crime n11 article 8 bi rome statute icc crime aggression n12 see convention prevention punishment crime genocide 9 december 1948 article 1 genocide convention provides contracting party confirm genocide whether committed time peace time war crime international law undertake prevent punish n13 see international law commission draft article crime humanity n14 example international criminal tribunal rwanda international tribunal former yugoslavia international residual mechanism criminal tribunal n15 example special court sierra leone residual special court sierra leone extraordinary chamber court cambodia n16 example special criminal court central african republic n17 consolidated sanction list includes individual entity subject sanction measure imposed security council httpswwwunorgscsuborgensanctionsunscconsolidatedlist n18 httpswwwunorgscctcresourcesinternationallegalinstruments httpwwwunorgen counterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n19 security council resolution 1373 2001 operative para 2e security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 19 n20 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 6 b c security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 n21 see resolution 2341 2017 n22 see resolution 2331 2016 n23 httpwwwunorgencounterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n24 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 4 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 18 30 n25 security council resolution 2349 2017 operative para 32 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 30 31 36 ares72282 para 39 n26 httpswwwunorgsecuritycouncilsanctionsinformation n27 one example description un security council group listed un security council committee established pursuant resolution 751 1992 1907 2009 concerning somalia terrorist group mandate united nation assistance mission somalia n28 httphrbaportalorgwpcontentfilesinteragencyhrddpguidancenote2015pdf n29 article 105 para 1 2 n30 convention privilege immunity un sect 20 23 n31 convention privilege immunity specialized agency sect 22 n32 convention privilege immunity un sect 21 responsibility generally reflected un host country agreement", "ProcessedSent": "n9 article 7 rome statute icc crime humanity", "SentID": 1241 }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22368,14 +22368,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes.", + "Sentence": "\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes.", "newParagraph": "1 source include among others international law source instrument well internal rule policy procedure n2 specifically first second geneva convention relate respectively improvement condition 1 wounded sick armed force field 2 condition wounded sick shipwrecked member armed force sea third geneva convention relates treatment prisoner war fourth geneva convention relates protection civilian time war including occupied territory additional protocol ii international treaty supplement geneva convention 1949 significantly improve legal protection covering civilian wounded additional protocol concern international armed conflict involving least two country additional protocol ii first international treaty applies solely civil war armed conflict within state set restriction use force conflict n3 article 31 1951 convention n4 article 12a 1951 convention n5 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 7 n6 human right committee general comment 36 2018 article 6 international covenant civil political right right life 30 october 2018 para 30 31 human right committee general comment 20 1992 article 7 international covenant civil political right prohibition torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 10 march 1992 para 9 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 18 19 n7 preamble rome statute icc sixth recital n8 article 6 rome statute icc genocide n9 article 7 rome statute icc crime humanity n10 article 8 rome statute icc war crime n11 article 8 bi rome statute icc crime aggression n12 see convention prevention punishment crime genocide 9 december 1948 article 1 genocide convention provides contracting party confirm genocide whether committed time peace time war crime international law undertake prevent punish n13 see international law commission draft article crime humanity n14 example international criminal tribunal rwanda international tribunal former yugoslavia international residual mechanism criminal tribunal n15 example special court sierra leone residual special court sierra leone extraordinary chamber court cambodia n16 example special criminal court central african republic n17 consolidated sanction list includes individual entity subject sanction measure imposed security council httpswwwunorgscsuborgensanctionsunscconsolidatedlist n18 httpswwwunorgscctcresourcesinternationallegalinstruments httpwwwunorgen counterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n19 security council resolution 1373 2001 operative para 2e security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 19 n20 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 6 b c security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 n21 see resolution 2341 2017 n22 see resolution 2331 2016 n23 httpwwwunorgencounterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n24 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 4 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 18 30 n25 security council resolution 2349 2017 operative para 32 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 30 31 36 ares72282 para 39 n26 httpswwwunorgsecuritycouncilsanctionsinformation n27 one example description un security council group listed un security council committee established pursuant resolution 751 1992 1907 2009 concerning somalia terrorist group mandate united nation assistance mission somalia n28 httphrbaportalorgwpcontentfilesinteragencyhrddpguidancenote2015pdf n29 article 105 para 1 2 n30 convention privilege immunity un sect 20 23 n31 convention privilege immunity specialized agency sect 22 n32 convention privilege immunity un sect 21 responsibility generally reflected un host country agreement", "ProcessedSent": "n10 article 8 rome statute icc war crime", "SentID": 1242 }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22386,14 +22386,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression.", + "Sentence": "\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression.", "newParagraph": "1 source include among others international law source instrument well internal rule policy procedure n2 specifically first second geneva convention relate respectively improvement condition 1 wounded sick armed force field 2 condition wounded sick shipwrecked member armed force sea third geneva convention relates treatment prisoner war fourth geneva convention relates protection civilian time war including occupied territory additional protocol ii international treaty supplement geneva convention 1949 significantly improve legal protection covering civilian wounded additional protocol concern international armed conflict involving least two country additional protocol ii first international treaty applies solely civil war armed conflict within state set restriction use force conflict n3 article 31 1951 convention n4 article 12a 1951 convention n5 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 7 n6 human right committee general comment 36 2018 article 6 international covenant civil political right right life 30 october 2018 para 30 31 human right committee general comment 20 1992 article 7 international covenant civil political right prohibition torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 10 march 1992 para 9 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 18 19 n7 preamble rome statute icc sixth recital n8 article 6 rome statute icc genocide n9 article 7 rome statute icc crime humanity n10 article 8 rome statute icc war crime n11 article 8 bi rome statute icc crime aggression n12 see convention prevention punishment crime genocide 9 december 1948 article 1 genocide convention provides contracting party confirm genocide whether committed time peace time war crime international law undertake prevent punish n13 see international law commission draft article crime humanity n14 example international criminal tribunal rwanda international tribunal former yugoslavia international residual mechanism criminal tribunal n15 example special court sierra leone residual special court sierra leone extraordinary chamber court cambodia n16 example special criminal court central african republic n17 consolidated sanction list includes individual entity subject sanction measure imposed security council httpswwwunorgscsuborgensanctionsunscconsolidatedlist n18 httpswwwunorgscctcresourcesinternationallegalinstruments httpwwwunorgen counterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n19 security council resolution 1373 2001 operative para 2e security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 19 n20 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 6 b c security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 n21 see resolution 2341 2017 n22 see resolution 2331 2016 n23 httpwwwunorgencounterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n24 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 4 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 18 30 n25 security council resolution 2349 2017 operative para 32 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 30 31 36 ares72282 para 39 n26 httpswwwunorgsecuritycouncilsanctionsinformation n27 one example description un security council group listed un security council committee established pursuant resolution 751 1992 1907 2009 concerning somalia terrorist group mandate united nation assistance mission somalia n28 httphrbaportalorgwpcontentfilesinteragencyhrddpguidancenote2015pdf n29 article 105 para 1 2 n30 convention privilege immunity un sect 20 23 n31 convention privilege immunity specialized agency sect 22 n32 convention privilege immunity un sect 21 responsibility generally reflected un host country agreement", "ProcessedSent": "n11 article 8 bi rome statute icc crime aggression", "SentID": 1243 }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22404,14 +22404,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948).", + "Sentence": "\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948).", "newParagraph": "1 source include among others international law source instrument well internal rule policy procedure n2 specifically first second geneva convention relate respectively improvement condition 1 wounded sick armed force field 2 condition wounded sick shipwrecked member armed force sea third geneva convention relates treatment prisoner war fourth geneva convention relates protection civilian time war including occupied territory additional protocol ii international treaty supplement geneva convention 1949 significantly improve legal protection covering civilian wounded additional protocol concern international armed conflict involving least two country additional protocol ii first international treaty applies solely civil war armed conflict within state set restriction use force conflict n3 article 31 1951 convention n4 article 12a 1951 convention n5 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 7 n6 human right committee general comment 36 2018 article 6 international covenant civil political right right life 30 october 2018 para 30 31 human right committee general comment 20 1992 article 7 international covenant civil political right prohibition torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 10 march 1992 para 9 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 18 19 n7 preamble rome statute icc sixth recital n8 article 6 rome statute icc genocide n9 article 7 rome statute icc crime humanity n10 article 8 rome statute icc war crime n11 article 8 bi rome statute icc crime aggression n12 see convention prevention punishment crime genocide 9 december 1948 article 1 genocide convention provides contracting party confirm genocide whether committed time peace time war crime international law undertake prevent punish n13 see international law commission draft article crime humanity n14 example international criminal tribunal rwanda international tribunal former yugoslavia international residual mechanism criminal tribunal n15 example special court sierra leone residual special court sierra leone extraordinary chamber court cambodia n16 example special criminal court central african republic n17 consolidated sanction list includes individual entity subject sanction measure imposed security council httpswwwunorgscsuborgensanctionsunscconsolidatedlist n18 httpswwwunorgscctcresourcesinternationallegalinstruments httpwwwunorgen counterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n19 security council resolution 1373 2001 operative para 2e security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 19 n20 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 6 b c security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 n21 see resolution 2341 2017 n22 see resolution 2331 2016 n23 httpwwwunorgencounterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n24 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 4 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 18 30 n25 security council resolution 2349 2017 operative para 32 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 30 31 36 ares72282 para 39 n26 httpswwwunorgsecuritycouncilsanctionsinformation n27 one example description un security council group listed un security council committee established pursuant resolution 751 1992 1907 2009 concerning somalia terrorist group mandate united nation assistance mission somalia n28 httphrbaportalorgwpcontentfilesinteragencyhrddpguidancenote2015pdf n29 article 105 para 1 2 n30 convention privilege immunity un sect 20 23 n31 convention privilege immunity specialized agency sect 22 n32 convention privilege immunity un sect 21 responsibility generally reflected un host country agreement", "ProcessedSent": "n12 see convention prevention punishment crime genocide 9 december 1948", "SentID": 1244 }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22429,7 +22429,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22440,14 +22440,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity.", + "Sentence": "\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity.", "newParagraph": "1 source include among others international law source instrument well internal rule policy procedure n2 specifically first second geneva convention relate respectively improvement condition 1 wounded sick armed force field 2 condition wounded sick shipwrecked member armed force sea third geneva convention relates treatment prisoner war fourth geneva convention relates protection civilian time war including occupied territory additional protocol ii international treaty supplement geneva convention 1949 significantly improve legal protection covering civilian wounded additional protocol concern international armed conflict involving least two country additional protocol ii first international treaty applies solely civil war armed conflict within state set restriction use force conflict n3 article 31 1951 convention n4 article 12a 1951 convention n5 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 7 n6 human right committee general comment 36 2018 article 6 international covenant civil political right right life 30 october 2018 para 30 31 human right committee general comment 20 1992 article 7 international covenant civil political right prohibition torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 10 march 1992 para 9 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 18 19 n7 preamble rome statute icc sixth recital n8 article 6 rome statute icc genocide n9 article 7 rome statute icc crime humanity n10 article 8 rome statute icc war crime n11 article 8 bi rome statute icc crime aggression n12 see convention prevention punishment crime genocide 9 december 1948 article 1 genocide convention provides contracting party confirm genocide whether committed time peace time war crime international law undertake prevent punish n13 see international law commission draft article crime humanity n14 example international criminal tribunal rwanda international tribunal former yugoslavia international residual mechanism criminal tribunal n15 example special court sierra leone residual special court sierra leone extraordinary chamber court cambodia n16 example special criminal court central african republic n17 consolidated sanction list includes individual entity subject sanction measure imposed security council httpswwwunorgscsuborgensanctionsunscconsolidatedlist n18 httpswwwunorgscctcresourcesinternationallegalinstruments httpwwwunorgen counterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n19 security council resolution 1373 2001 operative para 2e security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 19 n20 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 6 b c security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 n21 see resolution 2341 2017 n22 see resolution 2331 2016 n23 httpwwwunorgencounterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n24 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 4 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 18 30 n25 security council resolution 2349 2017 operative para 32 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 30 31 36 ares72282 para 39 n26 httpswwwunorgsecuritycouncilsanctionsinformation n27 one example description un security council group listed un security council committee established pursuant resolution 751 1992 1907 2009 concerning somalia terrorist group mandate united nation assistance mission somalia n28 httphrbaportalorgwpcontentfilesinteragencyhrddpguidancenote2015pdf n29 article 105 para 1 2 n30 convention privilege immunity un sect 20 23 n31 convention privilege immunity specialized agency sect 22 n32 convention privilege immunity un sect 21 responsibility generally reflected un host country agreement", "ProcessedSent": "n13 see international law commission draft article crime humanity", "SentID": 1246 }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22458,14 +22458,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals.", + "Sentence": "\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals.", "newParagraph": "1 source include among others international law source instrument well internal rule policy procedure n2 specifically first second geneva convention relate respectively improvement condition 1 wounded sick armed force field 2 condition wounded sick shipwrecked member armed force sea third geneva convention relates treatment prisoner war fourth geneva convention relates protection civilian time war including occupied territory additional protocol ii international treaty supplement geneva convention 1949 significantly improve legal protection covering civilian wounded additional protocol concern international armed conflict involving least two country additional protocol ii first international treaty applies solely civil war armed conflict within state set restriction use force conflict n3 article 31 1951 convention n4 article 12a 1951 convention n5 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 7 n6 human right committee general comment 36 2018 article 6 international covenant civil political right right life 30 october 2018 para 30 31 human right committee general comment 20 1992 article 7 international covenant civil political right prohibition torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 10 march 1992 para 9 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 18 19 n7 preamble rome statute icc sixth recital n8 article 6 rome statute icc genocide n9 article 7 rome statute icc crime humanity n10 article 8 rome statute icc war crime n11 article 8 bi rome statute icc crime aggression n12 see convention prevention punishment crime genocide 9 december 1948 article 1 genocide convention provides contracting party confirm genocide whether committed time peace time war crime international law undertake prevent punish n13 see international law commission draft article crime humanity n14 example international criminal tribunal rwanda international tribunal former yugoslavia international residual mechanism criminal tribunal n15 example special court sierra leone residual special court sierra leone extraordinary chamber court cambodia n16 example special criminal court central african republic n17 consolidated sanction list includes individual entity subject sanction measure imposed security council httpswwwunorgscsuborgensanctionsunscconsolidatedlist n18 httpswwwunorgscctcresourcesinternationallegalinstruments httpwwwunorgen counterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n19 security council resolution 1373 2001 operative para 2e security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 19 n20 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 6 b c security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 n21 see resolution 2341 2017 n22 see resolution 2331 2016 n23 httpwwwunorgencounterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n24 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 4 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 18 30 n25 security council resolution 2349 2017 operative para 32 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 30 31 36 ares72282 para 39 n26 httpswwwunorgsecuritycouncilsanctionsinformation n27 one example description un security council group listed un security council committee established pursuant resolution 751 1992 1907 2009 concerning somalia terrorist group mandate united nation assistance mission somalia n28 httphrbaportalorgwpcontentfilesinteragencyhrddpguidancenote2015pdf n29 article 105 para 1 2 n30 convention privilege immunity un sect 20 23 n31 convention privilege immunity specialized agency sect 22 n32 convention privilege immunity un sect 21 responsibility generally reflected un host country agreement", "ProcessedSent": "n14 example international criminal tribunal rwanda international tribunal former yugoslavia international residual mechanism criminal tribunal", "SentID": 1247 }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22476,14 +22476,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia.", + "Sentence": "\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia.", "newParagraph": "1 source include among others international law source instrument well internal rule policy procedure n2 specifically first second geneva convention relate respectively improvement condition 1 wounded sick armed force field 2 condition wounded sick shipwrecked member armed force sea third geneva convention relates treatment prisoner war fourth geneva convention relates protection civilian time war including occupied territory additional protocol ii international treaty supplement geneva convention 1949 significantly improve legal protection covering civilian wounded additional protocol concern international armed conflict involving least two country additional protocol ii first international treaty applies solely civil war armed conflict within state set restriction use force conflict n3 article 31 1951 convention n4 article 12a 1951 convention n5 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 7 n6 human right committee general comment 36 2018 article 6 international covenant civil political right right life 30 october 2018 para 30 31 human right committee general comment 20 1992 article 7 international covenant civil political right prohibition torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 10 march 1992 para 9 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 18 19 n7 preamble rome statute icc sixth recital n8 article 6 rome statute icc genocide n9 article 7 rome statute icc crime humanity n10 article 8 rome statute icc war crime n11 article 8 bi rome statute icc crime aggression n12 see convention prevention punishment crime genocide 9 december 1948 article 1 genocide convention provides contracting party confirm genocide whether committed time peace time war crime international law undertake prevent punish n13 see international law commission draft article crime humanity n14 example international criminal tribunal rwanda international tribunal former yugoslavia international residual mechanism criminal tribunal n15 example special court sierra leone residual special court sierra leone extraordinary chamber court cambodia n16 example special criminal court central african republic n17 consolidated sanction list includes individual entity subject sanction measure imposed security council httpswwwunorgscsuborgensanctionsunscconsolidatedlist n18 httpswwwunorgscctcresourcesinternationallegalinstruments httpwwwunorgen counterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n19 security council resolution 1373 2001 operative para 2e security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 19 n20 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 6 b c security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 n21 see resolution 2341 2017 n22 see resolution 2331 2016 n23 httpwwwunorgencounterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n24 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 4 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 18 30 n25 security council resolution 2349 2017 operative para 32 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 30 31 36 ares72282 para 39 n26 httpswwwunorgsecuritycouncilsanctionsinformation n27 one example description un security council group listed un security council committee established pursuant resolution 751 1992 1907 2009 concerning somalia terrorist group mandate united nation assistance mission somalia n28 httphrbaportalorgwpcontentfilesinteragencyhrddpguidancenote2015pdf n29 article 105 para 1 2 n30 convention privilege immunity un sect 20 23 n31 convention privilege immunity specialized agency sect 22 n32 convention privilege immunity un sect 21 responsibility generally reflected un host country agreement", "ProcessedSent": "n15 example special court sierra leone residual special court sierra leone extraordinary chamber court cambodia", "SentID": 1248 }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22494,14 +22494,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic.", + "Sentence": "\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic.", "newParagraph": "1 source include among others international law source instrument well internal rule policy procedure n2 specifically first second geneva convention relate respectively improvement condition 1 wounded sick armed force field 2 condition wounded sick shipwrecked member armed force sea third geneva convention relates treatment prisoner war fourth geneva convention relates protection civilian time war including occupied territory additional protocol ii international treaty supplement geneva convention 1949 significantly improve legal protection covering civilian wounded additional protocol concern international armed conflict involving least two country additional protocol ii first international treaty applies solely civil war armed conflict within state set restriction use force conflict n3 article 31 1951 convention n4 article 12a 1951 convention n5 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 7 n6 human right committee general comment 36 2018 article 6 international covenant civil political right right life 30 october 2018 para 30 31 human right committee general comment 20 1992 article 7 international covenant civil political right prohibition torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 10 march 1992 para 9 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 18 19 n7 preamble rome statute icc sixth recital n8 article 6 rome statute icc genocide n9 article 7 rome statute icc crime humanity n10 article 8 rome statute icc war crime n11 article 8 bi rome statute icc crime aggression n12 see convention prevention punishment crime genocide 9 december 1948 article 1 genocide convention provides contracting party confirm genocide whether committed time peace time war crime international law undertake prevent punish n13 see international law commission draft article crime humanity n14 example international criminal tribunal rwanda international tribunal former yugoslavia international residual mechanism criminal tribunal n15 example special court sierra leone residual special court sierra leone extraordinary chamber court cambodia n16 example special criminal court central african republic n17 consolidated sanction list includes individual entity subject sanction measure imposed security council httpswwwunorgscsuborgensanctionsunscconsolidatedlist n18 httpswwwunorgscctcresourcesinternationallegalinstruments httpwwwunorgen counterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n19 security council resolution 1373 2001 operative para 2e security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 19 n20 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 6 b c security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 n21 see resolution 2341 2017 n22 see resolution 2331 2016 n23 httpwwwunorgencounterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n24 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 4 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 18 30 n25 security council resolution 2349 2017 operative para 32 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 30 31 36 ares72282 para 39 n26 httpswwwunorgsecuritycouncilsanctionsinformation n27 one example description un security council group listed un security council committee established pursuant resolution 751 1992 1907 2009 concerning somalia terrorist group mandate united nation assistance mission somalia n28 httphrbaportalorgwpcontentfilesinteragencyhrddpguidancenote2015pdf n29 article 105 para 1 2 n30 convention privilege immunity un sect 20 23 n31 convention privilege immunity specialized agency sect 22 n32 convention privilege immunity un sect 21 responsibility generally reflected un host country agreement", "ProcessedSent": "n16 example special criminal court central african republic", "SentID": 1249 }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22512,14 +22512,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council.", + "Sentence": "\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council.", "newParagraph": "1 source include among others international law source instrument well internal rule policy procedure n2 specifically first second geneva convention relate respectively improvement condition 1 wounded sick armed force field 2 condition wounded sick shipwrecked member armed force sea third geneva convention relates treatment prisoner war fourth geneva convention relates protection civilian time war including occupied territory additional protocol ii international treaty supplement geneva convention 1949 significantly improve legal protection covering civilian wounded additional protocol concern international armed conflict involving least two country additional protocol ii first international treaty applies solely civil war armed conflict within state set restriction use force conflict n3 article 31 1951 convention n4 article 12a 1951 convention n5 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 7 n6 human right committee general comment 36 2018 article 6 international covenant civil political right right life 30 october 2018 para 30 31 human right committee general comment 20 1992 article 7 international covenant civil political right prohibition torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 10 march 1992 para 9 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 18 19 n7 preamble rome statute icc sixth recital n8 article 6 rome statute icc genocide n9 article 7 rome statute icc crime humanity n10 article 8 rome statute icc war crime n11 article 8 bi rome statute icc crime aggression n12 see convention prevention punishment crime genocide 9 december 1948 article 1 genocide convention provides contracting party confirm genocide whether committed time peace time war crime international law undertake prevent punish n13 see international law commission draft article crime humanity n14 example international criminal tribunal rwanda international tribunal former yugoslavia international residual mechanism criminal tribunal n15 example special court sierra leone residual special court sierra leone extraordinary chamber court cambodia n16 example special criminal court central african republic n17 consolidated sanction list includes individual entity subject sanction measure imposed security council httpswwwunorgscsuborgensanctionsunscconsolidatedlist n18 httpswwwunorgscctcresourcesinternationallegalinstruments httpwwwunorgen counterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n19 security council resolution 1373 2001 operative para 2e security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 19 n20 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 6 b c security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 n21 see resolution 2341 2017 n22 see resolution 2331 2016 n23 httpwwwunorgencounterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n24 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 4 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 18 30 n25 security council resolution 2349 2017 operative para 32 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 30 31 36 ares72282 para 39 n26 httpswwwunorgsecuritycouncilsanctionsinformation n27 one example description un security council group listed un security council committee established pursuant resolution 751 1992 1907 2009 concerning somalia terrorist group mandate united nation assistance mission somalia n28 httphrbaportalorgwpcontentfilesinteragencyhrddpguidancenote2015pdf n29 article 105 para 1 2 n30 convention privilege immunity un sect 20 23 n31 convention privilege immunity specialized agency sect 22 n32 convention privilege immunity un sect 21 responsibility generally reflected un host country agreement", "ProcessedSent": "n17 consolidated sanction list includes individual entity subject sanction measure imposed security council", "SentID": 1250 }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22537,7 +22537,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22548,14 +22548,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml.", + "Sentence": "\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml.", "newParagraph": "1 source include among others international law source instrument well internal rule policy procedure n2 specifically first second geneva convention relate respectively improvement condition 1 wounded sick armed force field 2 condition wounded sick shipwrecked member armed force sea third geneva convention relates treatment prisoner war fourth geneva convention relates protection civilian time war including occupied territory additional protocol ii international treaty supplement geneva convention 1949 significantly improve legal protection covering civilian wounded additional protocol concern international armed conflict involving least two country additional protocol ii first international treaty applies solely civil war armed conflict within state set restriction use force conflict n3 article 31 1951 convention n4 article 12a 1951 convention n5 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 7 n6 human right committee general comment 36 2018 article 6 international covenant civil political right right life 30 october 2018 para 30 31 human right committee general comment 20 1992 article 7 international covenant civil political right prohibition torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 10 march 1992 para 9 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 18 19 n7 preamble rome statute icc sixth recital n8 article 6 rome statute icc genocide n9 article 7 rome statute icc crime humanity n10 article 8 rome statute icc war crime n11 article 8 bi rome statute icc crime aggression n12 see convention prevention punishment crime genocide 9 december 1948 article 1 genocide convention provides contracting party confirm genocide whether committed time peace time war crime international law undertake prevent punish n13 see international law commission draft article crime humanity n14 example international criminal tribunal rwanda international tribunal former yugoslavia international residual mechanism criminal tribunal n15 example special court sierra leone residual special court sierra leone extraordinary chamber court cambodia n16 example special criminal court central african republic n17 consolidated sanction list includes individual entity subject sanction measure imposed security council httpswwwunorgscsuborgensanctionsunscconsolidatedlist n18 httpswwwunorgscctcresourcesinternationallegalinstruments httpwwwunorgen counterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n19 security council resolution 1373 2001 operative para 2e security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 19 n20 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 6 b c security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 n21 see resolution 2341 2017 n22 see resolution 2331 2016 n23 httpwwwunorgencounterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n24 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 4 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 18 30 n25 security council resolution 2349 2017 operative para 32 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 30 31 36 ares72282 para 39 n26 httpswwwunorgsecuritycouncilsanctionsinformation n27 one example description un security council group listed un security council committee established pursuant resolution 751 1992 1907 2009 concerning somalia terrorist group mandate united nation assistance mission somalia n28 httphrbaportalorgwpcontentfilesinteragencyhrddpguidancenote2015pdf n29 article 105 para 1 2 n30 convention privilege immunity un sect 20 23 n31 convention privilege immunity specialized agency sect 22 n32 convention privilege immunity un sect 21 responsibility generally reflected un host country agreement", "ProcessedSent": "n18 httpswwwunorgscctcresourcesinternationallegalinstruments httpwwwunorgen counterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml", "SentID": 1252 }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22566,14 +22566,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para.", + "Sentence": "\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para.", "newParagraph": "1 source include among others international law source instrument well internal rule policy procedure n2 specifically first second geneva convention relate respectively improvement condition 1 wounded sick armed force field 2 condition wounded sick shipwrecked member armed force sea third geneva convention relates treatment prisoner war fourth geneva convention relates protection civilian time war including occupied territory additional protocol ii international treaty supplement geneva convention 1949 significantly improve legal protection covering civilian wounded additional protocol concern international armed conflict involving least two country additional protocol ii first international treaty applies solely civil war armed conflict within state set restriction use force conflict n3 article 31 1951 convention n4 article 12a 1951 convention n5 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 7 n6 human right committee general comment 36 2018 article 6 international covenant civil political right right life 30 october 2018 para 30 31 human right committee general comment 20 1992 article 7 international covenant civil political right prohibition torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 10 march 1992 para 9 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 18 19 n7 preamble rome statute icc sixth recital n8 article 6 rome statute icc genocide n9 article 7 rome statute icc crime humanity n10 article 8 rome statute icc war crime n11 article 8 bi rome statute icc crime aggression n12 see convention prevention punishment crime genocide 9 december 1948 article 1 genocide convention provides contracting party confirm genocide whether committed time peace time war crime international law undertake prevent punish n13 see international law commission draft article crime humanity n14 example international criminal tribunal rwanda international tribunal former yugoslavia international residual mechanism criminal tribunal n15 example special court sierra leone residual special court sierra leone extraordinary chamber court cambodia n16 example special criminal court central african republic n17 consolidated sanction list includes individual entity subject sanction measure imposed security council httpswwwunorgscsuborgensanctionsunscconsolidatedlist n18 httpswwwunorgscctcresourcesinternationallegalinstruments httpwwwunorgen counterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n19 security council resolution 1373 2001 operative para 2e security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 19 n20 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 6 b c security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 n21 see resolution 2341 2017 n22 see resolution 2331 2016 n23 httpwwwunorgencounterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n24 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 4 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 18 30 n25 security council resolution 2349 2017 operative para 32 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 30 31 36 ares72282 para 39 n26 httpswwwunorgsecuritycouncilsanctionsinformation n27 one example description un security council group listed un security council committee established pursuant resolution 751 1992 1907 2009 concerning somalia terrorist group mandate united nation assistance mission somalia n28 httphrbaportalorgwpcontentfilesinteragencyhrddpguidancenote2015pdf n29 article 105 para 1 2 n30 convention privilege immunity un sect 20 23 n31 convention privilege immunity specialized agency sect 22 n32 convention privilege immunity un sect 21 responsibility generally reflected un host country agreement", "ProcessedSent": "n19 security council resolution 1373 2001 operative para", "SentID": 1253 }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22591,7 +22591,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22609,7 +22609,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22620,14 +22620,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras.", + "Sentence": "\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras.", "newParagraph": "1 source include among others international law source instrument well internal rule policy procedure n2 specifically first second geneva convention relate respectively improvement condition 1 wounded sick armed force field 2 condition wounded sick shipwrecked member armed force sea third geneva convention relates treatment prisoner war fourth geneva convention relates protection civilian time war including occupied territory additional protocol ii international treaty supplement geneva convention 1949 significantly improve legal protection covering civilian wounded additional protocol concern international armed conflict involving least two country additional protocol ii first international treaty applies solely civil war armed conflict within state set restriction use force conflict n3 article 31 1951 convention n4 article 12a 1951 convention n5 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 7 n6 human right committee general comment 36 2018 article 6 international covenant civil political right right life 30 october 2018 para 30 31 human right committee general comment 20 1992 article 7 international covenant civil political right prohibition torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 10 march 1992 para 9 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 18 19 n7 preamble rome statute icc sixth recital n8 article 6 rome statute icc genocide n9 article 7 rome statute icc crime humanity n10 article 8 rome statute icc war crime n11 article 8 bi rome statute icc crime aggression n12 see convention prevention punishment crime genocide 9 december 1948 article 1 genocide convention provides contracting party confirm genocide whether committed time peace time war crime international law undertake prevent punish n13 see international law commission draft article crime humanity n14 example international criminal tribunal rwanda international tribunal former yugoslavia international residual mechanism criminal tribunal n15 example special court sierra leone residual special court sierra leone extraordinary chamber court cambodia n16 example special criminal court central african republic n17 consolidated sanction list includes individual entity subject sanction measure imposed security council httpswwwunorgscsuborgensanctionsunscconsolidatedlist n18 httpswwwunorgscctcresourcesinternationallegalinstruments httpwwwunorgen counterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n19 security council resolution 1373 2001 operative para 2e security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 19 n20 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 6 b c security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 n21 see resolution 2341 2017 n22 see resolution 2331 2016 n23 httpwwwunorgencounterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n24 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 4 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 18 30 n25 security council resolution 2349 2017 operative para 32 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 30 31 36 ares72282 para 39 n26 httpswwwunorgsecuritycouncilsanctionsinformation n27 one example description un security council group listed un security council committee established pursuant resolution 751 1992 1907 2009 concerning somalia terrorist group mandate united nation assistance mission somalia n28 httphrbaportalorgwpcontentfilesinteragencyhrddpguidancenote2015pdf n29 article 105 para 1 2 n30 convention privilege immunity un sect 20 23 n31 convention privilege immunity specialized agency sect 22 n32 convention privilege immunity un sect 21 responsibility generally reflected un host country agreement", "ProcessedSent": "n20 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para", "SentID": 1256 }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22645,7 +22645,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22663,7 +22663,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22674,14 +22674,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016).", + "Sentence": "\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016).", "newParagraph": "1 source include among others international law source instrument well internal rule policy procedure n2 specifically first second geneva convention relate respectively improvement condition 1 wounded sick armed force field 2 condition wounded sick shipwrecked member armed force sea third geneva convention relates treatment prisoner war fourth geneva convention relates protection civilian time war including occupied territory additional protocol ii international treaty supplement geneva convention 1949 significantly improve legal protection covering civilian wounded additional protocol concern international armed conflict involving least two country additional protocol ii first international treaty applies solely civil war armed conflict within state set restriction use force conflict n3 article 31 1951 convention n4 article 12a 1951 convention n5 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 7 n6 human right committee general comment 36 2018 article 6 international covenant civil political right right life 30 october 2018 para 30 31 human right committee general comment 20 1992 article 7 international covenant civil political right prohibition torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 10 march 1992 para 9 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 18 19 n7 preamble rome statute icc sixth recital n8 article 6 rome statute icc genocide n9 article 7 rome statute icc crime humanity n10 article 8 rome statute icc war crime n11 article 8 bi rome statute icc crime aggression n12 see convention prevention punishment crime genocide 9 december 1948 article 1 genocide convention provides contracting party confirm genocide whether committed time peace time war crime international law undertake prevent punish n13 see international law commission draft article crime humanity n14 example international criminal tribunal rwanda international tribunal former yugoslavia international residual mechanism criminal tribunal n15 example special court sierra leone residual special court sierra leone extraordinary chamber court cambodia n16 example special criminal court central african republic n17 consolidated sanction list includes individual entity subject sanction measure imposed security council httpswwwunorgscsuborgensanctionsunscconsolidatedlist n18 httpswwwunorgscctcresourcesinternationallegalinstruments httpwwwunorgen counterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n19 security council resolution 1373 2001 operative para 2e security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 19 n20 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 6 b c security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 n21 see resolution 2341 2017 n22 see resolution 2331 2016 n23 httpwwwunorgencounterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n24 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 4 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 18 30 n25 security council resolution 2349 2017 operative para 32 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 30 31 36 ares72282 para 39 n26 httpswwwunorgsecuritycouncilsanctionsinformation n27 one example description un security council group listed un security council committee established pursuant resolution 751 1992 1907 2009 concerning somalia terrorist group mandate united nation assistance mission somalia n28 httphrbaportalorgwpcontentfilesinteragencyhrddpguidancenote2015pdf n29 article 105 para 1 2 n30 convention privilege immunity un sect 20 23 n31 convention privilege immunity specialized agency sect 22 n32 convention privilege immunity un sect 21 responsibility generally reflected un host country agreement", "ProcessedSent": "n21 see resolution 2341 2017 n22 see resolution 2331 2016", "SentID": 1259 }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22692,14 +22692,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para.", + "Sentence": "\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para.", "newParagraph": "1 source include among others international law source instrument well internal rule policy procedure n2 specifically first second geneva convention relate respectively improvement condition 1 wounded sick armed force field 2 condition wounded sick shipwrecked member armed force sea third geneva convention relates treatment prisoner war fourth geneva convention relates protection civilian time war including occupied territory additional protocol ii international treaty supplement geneva convention 1949 significantly improve legal protection covering civilian wounded additional protocol concern international armed conflict involving least two country additional protocol ii first international treaty applies solely civil war armed conflict within state set restriction use force conflict n3 article 31 1951 convention n4 article 12a 1951 convention n5 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 7 n6 human right committee general comment 36 2018 article 6 international covenant civil political right right life 30 october 2018 para 30 31 human right committee general comment 20 1992 article 7 international covenant civil political right prohibition torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 10 march 1992 para 9 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 18 19 n7 preamble rome statute icc sixth recital n8 article 6 rome statute icc genocide n9 article 7 rome statute icc crime humanity n10 article 8 rome statute icc war crime n11 article 8 bi rome statute icc crime aggression n12 see convention prevention punishment crime genocide 9 december 1948 article 1 genocide convention provides contracting party confirm genocide whether committed time peace time war crime international law undertake prevent punish n13 see international law commission draft article crime humanity n14 example international criminal tribunal rwanda international tribunal former yugoslavia international residual mechanism criminal tribunal n15 example special court sierra leone residual special court sierra leone extraordinary chamber court cambodia n16 example special criminal court central african republic n17 consolidated sanction list includes individual entity subject sanction measure imposed security council httpswwwunorgscsuborgensanctionsunscconsolidatedlist n18 httpswwwunorgscctcresourcesinternationallegalinstruments httpwwwunorgen counterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n19 security council resolution 1373 2001 operative para 2e security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 19 n20 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 6 b c security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 n21 see resolution 2341 2017 n22 see resolution 2331 2016 n23 httpwwwunorgencounterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n24 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 4 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 18 30 n25 security council resolution 2349 2017 operative para 32 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 30 31 36 ares72282 para 39 n26 httpswwwunorgsecuritycouncilsanctionsinformation n27 one example description un security council group listed un security council committee established pursuant resolution 751 1992 1907 2009 concerning somalia terrorist group mandate united nation assistance mission somalia n28 httphrbaportalorgwpcontentfilesinteragencyhrddpguidancenote2015pdf n29 article 105 para 1 2 n30 convention privilege immunity un sect 20 23 n31 convention privilege immunity specialized agency sect 22 n32 convention privilege immunity un sect 21 responsibility generally reflected un host country agreement", "ProcessedSent": "n23 httpwwwunorgencounterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n24 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para", "SentID": 1260 }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22717,7 +22717,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22735,7 +22735,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22746,14 +22746,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para.", + "Sentence": "\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para.", "newParagraph": "1 source include among others international law source instrument well internal rule policy procedure n2 specifically first second geneva convention relate respectively improvement condition 1 wounded sick armed force field 2 condition wounded sick shipwrecked member armed force sea third geneva convention relates treatment prisoner war fourth geneva convention relates protection civilian time war including occupied territory additional protocol ii international treaty supplement geneva convention 1949 significantly improve legal protection covering civilian wounded additional protocol concern international armed conflict involving least two country additional protocol ii first international treaty applies solely civil war armed conflict within state set restriction use force conflict n3 article 31 1951 convention n4 article 12a 1951 convention n5 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 7 n6 human right committee general comment 36 2018 article 6 international covenant civil political right right life 30 october 2018 para 30 31 human right committee general comment 20 1992 article 7 international covenant civil political right prohibition torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 10 march 1992 para 9 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 18 19 n7 preamble rome statute icc sixth recital n8 article 6 rome statute icc genocide n9 article 7 rome statute icc crime humanity n10 article 8 rome statute icc war crime n11 article 8 bi rome statute icc crime aggression n12 see convention prevention punishment crime genocide 9 december 1948 article 1 genocide convention provides contracting party confirm genocide whether committed time peace time war crime international law undertake prevent punish n13 see international law commission draft article crime humanity n14 example international criminal tribunal rwanda international tribunal former yugoslavia international residual mechanism criminal tribunal n15 example special court sierra leone residual special court sierra leone extraordinary chamber court cambodia n16 example special criminal court central african republic n17 consolidated sanction list includes individual entity subject sanction measure imposed security council httpswwwunorgscsuborgensanctionsunscconsolidatedlist n18 httpswwwunorgscctcresourcesinternationallegalinstruments httpwwwunorgen counterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n19 security council resolution 1373 2001 operative para 2e security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 19 n20 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 6 b c security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 n21 see resolution 2341 2017 n22 see resolution 2331 2016 n23 httpwwwunorgencounterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n24 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 4 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 18 30 n25 security council resolution 2349 2017 operative para 32 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 30 31 36 ares72282 para 39 n26 httpswwwunorgsecuritycouncilsanctionsinformation n27 one example description un security council group listed un security council committee established pursuant resolution 751 1992 1907 2009 concerning somalia terrorist group mandate united nation assistance mission somalia n28 httphrbaportalorgwpcontentfilesinteragencyhrddpguidancenote2015pdf n29 article 105 para 1 2 n30 convention privilege immunity un sect 20 23 n31 convention privilege immunity specialized agency sect 22 n32 convention privilege immunity un sect 21 responsibility generally reflected un host country agreement", "ProcessedSent": "n25 security council resolution 2349 2017 operative para", "SentID": 1263 }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22771,7 +22771,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22789,7 +22789,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22807,7 +22807,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22818,14 +22818,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information.", + "Sentence": "\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information.", "newParagraph": "1 source include among others international law source instrument well internal rule policy procedure n2 specifically first second geneva convention relate respectively improvement condition 1 wounded sick armed force field 2 condition wounded sick shipwrecked member armed force sea third geneva convention relates treatment prisoner war fourth geneva convention relates protection civilian time war including occupied territory additional protocol ii international treaty supplement geneva convention 1949 significantly improve legal protection covering civilian wounded additional protocol concern international armed conflict involving least two country additional protocol ii first international treaty applies solely civil war armed conflict within state set restriction use force conflict n3 article 31 1951 convention n4 article 12a 1951 convention n5 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 7 n6 human right committee general comment 36 2018 article 6 international covenant civil political right right life 30 october 2018 para 30 31 human right committee general comment 20 1992 article 7 international covenant civil political right prohibition torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 10 march 1992 para 9 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 18 19 n7 preamble rome statute icc sixth recital n8 article 6 rome statute icc genocide n9 article 7 rome statute icc crime humanity n10 article 8 rome statute icc war crime n11 article 8 bi rome statute icc crime aggression n12 see convention prevention punishment crime genocide 9 december 1948 article 1 genocide convention provides contracting party confirm genocide whether committed time peace time war crime international law undertake prevent punish n13 see international law commission draft article crime humanity n14 example international criminal tribunal rwanda international tribunal former yugoslavia international residual mechanism criminal tribunal n15 example special court sierra leone residual special court sierra leone extraordinary chamber court cambodia n16 example special criminal court central african republic n17 consolidated sanction list includes individual entity subject sanction measure imposed security council httpswwwunorgscsuborgensanctionsunscconsolidatedlist n18 httpswwwunorgscctcresourcesinternationallegalinstruments httpwwwunorgen counterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n19 security council resolution 1373 2001 operative para 2e security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 19 n20 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 6 b c security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 n21 see resolution 2341 2017 n22 see resolution 2331 2016 n23 httpwwwunorgencounterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n24 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 4 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 18 30 n25 security council resolution 2349 2017 operative para 32 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 30 31 36 ares72282 para 39 n26 httpswwwunorgsecuritycouncilsanctionsinformation n27 one example description un security council group listed un security council committee established pursuant resolution 751 1992 1907 2009 concerning somalia terrorist group mandate united nation assistance mission somalia n28 httphrbaportalorgwpcontentfilesinteragencyhrddpguidancenote2015pdf n29 article 105 para 1 2 n30 convention privilege immunity un sect 20 23 n31 convention privilege immunity specialized agency sect 22 n32 convention privilege immunity un sect 21 responsibility generally reflected un host country agreement", "ProcessedSent": "n26 httpswwwunorgsecuritycouncilsanctionsinformation", "SentID": 1267 }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22836,14 +22836,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia.", + "Sentence": "\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia.", "newParagraph": "1 source include among others international law source instrument well internal rule policy procedure n2 specifically first second geneva convention relate respectively improvement condition 1 wounded sick armed force field 2 condition wounded sick shipwrecked member armed force sea third geneva convention relates treatment prisoner war fourth geneva convention relates protection civilian time war including occupied territory additional protocol ii international treaty supplement geneva convention 1949 significantly improve legal protection covering civilian wounded additional protocol concern international armed conflict involving least two country additional protocol ii first international treaty applies solely civil war armed conflict within state set restriction use force conflict n3 article 31 1951 convention n4 article 12a 1951 convention n5 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 7 n6 human right committee general comment 36 2018 article 6 international covenant civil political right right life 30 october 2018 para 30 31 human right committee general comment 20 1992 article 7 international covenant civil political right prohibition torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 10 march 1992 para 9 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 18 19 n7 preamble rome statute icc sixth recital n8 article 6 rome statute icc genocide n9 article 7 rome statute icc crime humanity n10 article 8 rome statute icc war crime n11 article 8 bi rome statute icc crime aggression n12 see convention prevention punishment crime genocide 9 december 1948 article 1 genocide convention provides contracting party confirm genocide whether committed time peace time war crime international law undertake prevent punish n13 see international law commission draft article crime humanity n14 example international criminal tribunal rwanda international tribunal former yugoslavia international residual mechanism criminal tribunal n15 example special court sierra leone residual special court sierra leone extraordinary chamber court cambodia n16 example special criminal court central african republic n17 consolidated sanction list includes individual entity subject sanction measure imposed security council httpswwwunorgscsuborgensanctionsunscconsolidatedlist n18 httpswwwunorgscctcresourcesinternationallegalinstruments httpwwwunorgen counterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n19 security council resolution 1373 2001 operative para 2e security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 19 n20 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 6 b c security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 n21 see resolution 2341 2017 n22 see resolution 2331 2016 n23 httpwwwunorgencounterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n24 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 4 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 18 30 n25 security council resolution 2349 2017 operative para 32 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 30 31 36 ares72282 para 39 n26 httpswwwunorgsecuritycouncilsanctionsinformation n27 one example description un security council group listed un security council committee established pursuant resolution 751 1992 1907 2009 concerning somalia terrorist group mandate united nation assistance mission somalia n28 httphrbaportalorgwpcontentfilesinteragencyhrddpguidancenote2015pdf n29 article 105 para 1 2 n30 convention privilege immunity un sect 20 23 n31 convention privilege immunity specialized agency sect 22 n32 convention privilege immunity un sect 21 responsibility generally reflected un host country agreement", "ProcessedSent": "n27 one example description un security council group listed un security council committee established pursuant resolution 751 1992 1907 2009 concerning somalia terrorist group mandate united nation assistance mission somalia", "SentID": 1268 }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22854,14 +22854,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf.", + "Sentence": "\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf.", "newParagraph": "1 source include among others international law source instrument well internal rule policy procedure n2 specifically first second geneva convention relate respectively improvement condition 1 wounded sick armed force field 2 condition wounded sick shipwrecked member armed force sea third geneva convention relates treatment prisoner war fourth geneva convention relates protection civilian time war including occupied territory additional protocol ii international treaty supplement geneva convention 1949 significantly improve legal protection covering civilian wounded additional protocol concern international armed conflict involving least two country additional protocol ii first international treaty applies solely civil war armed conflict within state set restriction use force conflict n3 article 31 1951 convention n4 article 12a 1951 convention n5 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 7 n6 human right committee general comment 36 2018 article 6 international covenant civil political right right life 30 october 2018 para 30 31 human right committee general comment 20 1992 article 7 international covenant civil political right prohibition torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 10 march 1992 para 9 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 18 19 n7 preamble rome statute icc sixth recital n8 article 6 rome statute icc genocide n9 article 7 rome statute icc crime humanity n10 article 8 rome statute icc war crime n11 article 8 bi rome statute icc crime aggression n12 see convention prevention punishment crime genocide 9 december 1948 article 1 genocide convention provides contracting party confirm genocide whether committed time peace time war crime international law undertake prevent punish n13 see international law commission draft article crime humanity n14 example international criminal tribunal rwanda international tribunal former yugoslavia international residual mechanism criminal tribunal n15 example special court sierra leone residual special court sierra leone extraordinary chamber court cambodia n16 example special criminal court central african republic n17 consolidated sanction list includes individual entity subject sanction measure imposed security council httpswwwunorgscsuborgensanctionsunscconsolidatedlist n18 httpswwwunorgscctcresourcesinternationallegalinstruments httpwwwunorgen counterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n19 security council resolution 1373 2001 operative para 2e security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 19 n20 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 6 b c security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 n21 see resolution 2341 2017 n22 see resolution 2331 2016 n23 httpwwwunorgencounterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n24 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 4 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 18 30 n25 security council resolution 2349 2017 operative para 32 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 30 31 36 ares72282 para 39 n26 httpswwwunorgsecuritycouncilsanctionsinformation n27 one example description un security council group listed un security council committee established pursuant resolution 751 1992 1907 2009 concerning somalia terrorist group mandate united nation assistance mission somalia n28 httphrbaportalorgwpcontentfilesinteragencyhrddpguidancenote2015pdf n29 article 105 para 1 2 n30 convention privilege immunity un sect 20 23 n31 convention privilege immunity specialized agency sect 22 n32 convention privilege immunity un sect 21 responsibility generally reflected un host country agreement", "ProcessedSent": "n28 httphrbaportalorgwpcontentfilesinteragencyhrddpguidancenote2015pdf", "SentID": 1269 }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22872,14 +22872,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n29 Article 105, paras.", + "Sentence": "\n29 Article 105, paras.", "newParagraph": "1 source include among others international law source instrument well internal rule policy procedure n2 specifically first second geneva convention relate respectively improvement condition 1 wounded sick armed force field 2 condition wounded sick shipwrecked member armed force sea third geneva convention relates treatment prisoner war fourth geneva convention relates protection civilian time war including occupied territory additional protocol ii international treaty supplement geneva convention 1949 significantly improve legal protection covering civilian wounded additional protocol concern international armed conflict involving least two country additional protocol ii first international treaty applies solely civil war armed conflict within state set restriction use force conflict n3 article 31 1951 convention n4 article 12a 1951 convention n5 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 7 n6 human right committee general comment 36 2018 article 6 international covenant civil political right right life 30 october 2018 para 30 31 human right committee general comment 20 1992 article 7 international covenant civil political right prohibition torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 10 march 1992 para 9 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 18 19 n7 preamble rome statute icc sixth recital n8 article 6 rome statute icc genocide n9 article 7 rome statute icc crime humanity n10 article 8 rome statute icc war crime n11 article 8 bi rome statute icc crime aggression n12 see convention prevention punishment crime genocide 9 december 1948 article 1 genocide convention provides contracting party confirm genocide whether committed time peace time war crime international law undertake prevent punish n13 see international law commission draft article crime humanity n14 example international criminal tribunal rwanda international tribunal former yugoslavia international residual mechanism criminal tribunal n15 example special court sierra leone residual special court sierra leone extraordinary chamber court cambodia n16 example special criminal court central african republic n17 consolidated sanction list includes individual entity subject sanction measure imposed security council httpswwwunorgscsuborgensanctionsunscconsolidatedlist n18 httpswwwunorgscctcresourcesinternationallegalinstruments httpwwwunorgen counterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n19 security council resolution 1373 2001 operative para 2e security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 19 n20 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 6 b c security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 n21 see resolution 2341 2017 n22 see resolution 2331 2016 n23 httpwwwunorgencounterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n24 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 4 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 18 30 n25 security council resolution 2349 2017 operative para 32 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 30 31 36 ares72282 para 39 n26 httpswwwunorgsecuritycouncilsanctionsinformation n27 one example description un security council group listed un security council committee established pursuant resolution 751 1992 1907 2009 concerning somalia terrorist group mandate united nation assistance mission somalia n28 httphrbaportalorgwpcontentfilesinteragencyhrddpguidancenote2015pdf n29 article 105 para 1 2 n30 convention privilege immunity un sect 20 23 n31 convention privilege immunity specialized agency sect 22 n32 convention privilege immunity un sect 21 responsibility generally reflected un host country agreement", "ProcessedSent": "n29 article 105 para", "SentID": 1270 }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22897,7 +22897,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22908,14 +22908,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect.", + "Sentence": "\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect.", "newParagraph": "1 source include among others international law source instrument well internal rule policy procedure n2 specifically first second geneva convention relate respectively improvement condition 1 wounded sick armed force field 2 condition wounded sick shipwrecked member armed force sea third geneva convention relates treatment prisoner war fourth geneva convention relates protection civilian time war including occupied territory additional protocol ii international treaty supplement geneva convention 1949 significantly improve legal protection covering civilian wounded additional protocol concern international armed conflict involving least two country additional protocol ii first international treaty applies solely civil war armed conflict within state set restriction use force conflict n3 article 31 1951 convention n4 article 12a 1951 convention n5 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 7 n6 human right committee general comment 36 2018 article 6 international covenant civil political right right life 30 october 2018 para 30 31 human right committee general comment 20 1992 article 7 international covenant civil political right prohibition torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 10 march 1992 para 9 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 18 19 n7 preamble rome statute icc sixth recital n8 article 6 rome statute icc genocide n9 article 7 rome statute icc crime humanity n10 article 8 rome statute icc war crime n11 article 8 bi rome statute icc crime aggression n12 see convention prevention punishment crime genocide 9 december 1948 article 1 genocide convention provides contracting party confirm genocide whether committed time peace time war crime international law undertake prevent punish n13 see international law commission draft article crime humanity n14 example international criminal tribunal rwanda international tribunal former yugoslavia international residual mechanism criminal tribunal n15 example special court sierra leone residual special court sierra leone extraordinary chamber court cambodia n16 example special criminal court central african republic n17 consolidated sanction list includes individual entity subject sanction measure imposed security council httpswwwunorgscsuborgensanctionsunscconsolidatedlist n18 httpswwwunorgscctcresourcesinternationallegalinstruments httpwwwunorgen counterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n19 security council resolution 1373 2001 operative para 2e security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 19 n20 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 6 b c security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 n21 see resolution 2341 2017 n22 see resolution 2331 2016 n23 httpwwwunorgencounterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n24 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 4 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 18 30 n25 security council resolution 2349 2017 operative para 32 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 30 31 36 ares72282 para 39 n26 httpswwwunorgsecuritycouncilsanctionsinformation n27 one example description un security council group listed un security council committee established pursuant resolution 751 1992 1907 2009 concerning somalia terrorist group mandate united nation assistance mission somalia n28 httphrbaportalorgwpcontentfilesinteragencyhrddpguidancenote2015pdf n29 article 105 para 1 2 n30 convention privilege immunity un sect 20 23 n31 convention privilege immunity specialized agency sect 22 n32 convention privilege immunity un sect 21 responsibility generally reflected un host country agreement", "ProcessedSent": "n30 convention privilege immunity un sect", "SentID": 1272 }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22933,7 +22933,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22944,14 +22944,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect.", + "Sentence": "\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect.", "newParagraph": "1 source include among others international law source instrument well internal rule policy procedure n2 specifically first second geneva convention relate respectively improvement condition 1 wounded sick armed force field 2 condition wounded sick shipwrecked member armed force sea third geneva convention relates treatment prisoner war fourth geneva convention relates protection civilian time war including occupied territory additional protocol ii international treaty supplement geneva convention 1949 significantly improve legal protection covering civilian wounded additional protocol concern international armed conflict involving least two country additional protocol ii first international treaty applies solely civil war armed conflict within state set restriction use force conflict n3 article 31 1951 convention n4 article 12a 1951 convention n5 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 7 n6 human right committee general comment 36 2018 article 6 international covenant civil political right right life 30 october 2018 para 30 31 human right committee general comment 20 1992 article 7 international covenant civil political right prohibition torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 10 march 1992 para 9 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 18 19 n7 preamble rome statute icc sixth recital n8 article 6 rome statute icc genocide n9 article 7 rome statute icc crime humanity n10 article 8 rome statute icc war crime n11 article 8 bi rome statute icc crime aggression n12 see convention prevention punishment crime genocide 9 december 1948 article 1 genocide convention provides contracting party confirm genocide whether committed time peace time war crime international law undertake prevent punish n13 see international law commission draft article crime humanity n14 example international criminal tribunal rwanda international tribunal former yugoslavia international residual mechanism criminal tribunal n15 example special court sierra leone residual special court sierra leone extraordinary chamber court cambodia n16 example special criminal court central african republic n17 consolidated sanction list includes individual entity subject sanction measure imposed security council httpswwwunorgscsuborgensanctionsunscconsolidatedlist n18 httpswwwunorgscctcresourcesinternationallegalinstruments httpwwwunorgen counterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n19 security council resolution 1373 2001 operative para 2e security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 19 n20 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 6 b c security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 n21 see resolution 2341 2017 n22 see resolution 2331 2016 n23 httpwwwunorgencounterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n24 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 4 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 18 30 n25 security council resolution 2349 2017 operative para 32 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 30 31 36 ares72282 para 39 n26 httpswwwunorgsecuritycouncilsanctionsinformation n27 one example description un security council group listed un security council committee established pursuant resolution 751 1992 1907 2009 concerning somalia terrorist group mandate united nation assistance mission somalia n28 httphrbaportalorgwpcontentfilesinteragencyhrddpguidancenote2015pdf n29 article 105 para 1 2 n30 convention privilege immunity un sect 20 23 n31 convention privilege immunity specialized agency sect 22 n32 convention privilege immunity un sect 21 responsibility generally reflected un host country agreement", "ProcessedSent": "n31 convention privilege immunity specialized agency sect", "SentID": 1274 }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22969,7 +22969,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -22980,14 +22980,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect.", + "Sentence": "\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect.", "newParagraph": "1 source include among others international law source instrument well internal rule policy procedure n2 specifically first second geneva convention relate respectively improvement condition 1 wounded sick armed force field 2 condition wounded sick shipwrecked member armed force sea third geneva convention relates treatment prisoner war fourth geneva convention relates protection civilian time war including occupied territory additional protocol ii international treaty supplement geneva convention 1949 significantly improve legal protection covering civilian wounded additional protocol concern international armed conflict involving least two country additional protocol ii first international treaty applies solely civil war armed conflict within state set restriction use force conflict n3 article 31 1951 convention n4 article 12a 1951 convention n5 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 7 n6 human right committee general comment 36 2018 article 6 international covenant civil political right right life 30 october 2018 para 30 31 human right committee general comment 20 1992 article 7 international covenant civil political right prohibition torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment 10 march 1992 para 9 unhcr advisory opinion extraterritorial application nonrefoulement obligation 1951 convention relating status refugee 1967 protocol 26 january 2007 para 18 19 n7 preamble rome statute icc sixth recital n8 article 6 rome statute icc genocide n9 article 7 rome statute icc crime humanity n10 article 8 rome statute icc war crime n11 article 8 bi rome statute icc crime aggression n12 see convention prevention punishment crime genocide 9 december 1948 article 1 genocide convention provides contracting party confirm genocide whether committed time peace time war crime international law undertake prevent punish n13 see international law commission draft article crime humanity n14 example international criminal tribunal rwanda international tribunal former yugoslavia international residual mechanism criminal tribunal n15 example special court sierra leone residual special court sierra leone extraordinary chamber court cambodia n16 example special criminal court central african republic n17 consolidated sanction list includes individual entity subject sanction measure imposed security council httpswwwunorgscsuborgensanctionsunscconsolidatedlist n18 httpswwwunorgscctcresourcesinternationallegalinstruments httpwwwunorgen counterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n19 security council resolution 1373 2001 operative para 2e security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 19 n20 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 6 b c security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 17 n21 see resolution 2341 2017 n22 see resolution 2331 2016 n23 httpwwwunorgencounterterrorismlegalinstrumentsshtml n24 security council resolution 2178 2014 operative para 4 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 18 30 n25 security council resolution 2349 2017 operative para 32 security council resolution 2396 2017 operative para 30 31 36 ares72282 para 39 n26 httpswwwunorgsecuritycouncilsanctionsinformation n27 one example description un security council group listed un security council committee established pursuant resolution 751 1992 1907 2009 concerning somalia terrorist group mandate united nation assistance mission somalia n28 httphrbaportalorgwpcontentfilesinteragencyhrddpguidancenote2015pdf n29 article 105 para 1 2 n30 convention privilege immunity un sect 20 23 n31 convention privilege immunity specialized agency sect 22 n32 convention privilege immunity un sect 21 responsibility generally reflected un host country agreement", "ProcessedSent": "n32 convention privilege immunity un sect", "SentID": 1276 }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -23005,7 +23005,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 472, - "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \\n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \\n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \\n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \\n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \\n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \\n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \\n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \\n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \\n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \\n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \\n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \\n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \\n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \\n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \\n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \\n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \\n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \\n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \\n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \\n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \\n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \\n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \\n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \\n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \\n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \\n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \\n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \\n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \\n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \\n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \\n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", + "Paragraph": "1 These sources include, among others, international law sources and instruments, as well as internal rules, policies and procedures. \n2 Specifically, the first and second Geneva Conventions relate respectively to the improvement of the conditions of (1) the wounded and sick of armed forces in the field and (2) the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. The third Geneva Convention relates to the treatment of prisoners of war, and the fourth Geneva Convention relates to the protection of civilians in time of war, including in occupied territory. Additional Protocols I and II are international treaties that supplement the Geneva Conventions of 1949. They significantly improve the legal protections covering civilians and the wounded. Additional Protocol I concerns international armed conflicts, that is, those involving at least two countries. Additional Protocol II is the first international treaty that applies solely to civil wars and other armed conflicts within a State and sets restrictions on the use of force in those conflicts. \n3 Article 31 of the 1951 Convention. \n4 Article 1(2)A of the 1951 Convention. \n5 UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), para 7. \n6 Human Rights Committee general comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life (30 October 2018), paras. 30 and 31; Human Rights Committee general comment No. 20 (1992) on article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (10 March 1992), para. 9; UNHCR Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (26 January 2007), paras. 18 and 19. \n7 Preamble of the Rome Statute of the ICC, sixth recital. \n8 Article 6 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Genocide. \n9 Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crimes against humanity. \n10 Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 War crimes. \n11 Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute of the ICC \u2013 Crime of aggression. \n12 See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (9 December 1948). Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. \n13 See International Law Commission\u2019s draft articles on crimes against humanity. \n14 For example, the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. \n15 For example, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. \n16 For example, the Special Criminal Court in Central African Republic. \n17 The Consolidated Sanctions List includes all individuals and entities subject to sanctions measures imposed by the Security Council. (https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/suborg\/en\/sanctions\/un-sc-consolidated-list#). \n18 https:\/\/www.un.org\/sc\/ctc\/resources\/international-legal-instruments\/ and http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/ counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml. \n19 Security Council resolution 1373 (2001), operative para. 2(e); and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 17 and 19. \n20 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative paras. 6 (a), (b) and (c); Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative para. 17. \n21 See resolution 2341 (2017) \n22 See resolution 2331 (2016). \n23 http:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/counterterrorism\/legal-instruments.shtml \n24 Security Council resolution 2178 (2014), operative para. 4, and Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 18 and 30. \n25 Security Council resolution 2349 (2017), operative para. 32; Security Council resolution 2396 (2017), operative paras. 30, 31, 36, A\/RES\/72\/282, para. 39. \n26 https:\/\/www.un.org\/securitycouncil\/sanctions\/information. \n27 One example is the description, by the UN Security Council, of a group that is listed by the UN Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia, as a \u2018terrorist group\u2019 in the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia. \n28 http:\/\/hrbaportal.org\/wp-content\/files\/Inter-Agency-HRDDP-Guidance-Note-2015.pdf. \n29 Article 105, paras. 1 and 2. \n30 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 20 and 23. \n31 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, sect. 22. \n32 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, sect. 21. This responsibility is generally reflected in UN host country agreements.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -23509,7 +23509,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 481, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a. \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b. \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c. \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d. \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \\n e. \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a. \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b. \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c. \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d. \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \n e. \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -23527,7 +23527,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 481, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a. \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b. \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c. \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d. \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \\n e. \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a. \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b. \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c. \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d. \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \n e. \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -23538,14 +23538,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a.", + "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a.", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may must used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "ProcessedSent": "use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n", "SentID": 1307 }, { "ParagraphID": 481, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a. \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b. \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c. \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d. \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \\n e. \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a. \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b. \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c. \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d. \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \n e. \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -23556,14 +23556,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b.", + "Sentence": "\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b.", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may must used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "ProcessedSent": " shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b", "SentID": 1308 }, { "ParagraphID": 481, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a. \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b. \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c. \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d. \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \\n e. \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a. \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b. \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c. \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d. \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \n e. \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -23574,7 +23574,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c. \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d. \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \\n e. \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Sentence": "\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c. \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d. \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \n e. \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may must used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "ProcessedSent": " used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "SentID": 1309 @@ -24265,7 +24265,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 494, - "Paragraph": "The structures and motivations of armed forces and groups should be assessed. \\n It should be kept in mind, however, that these structures and motivations may vary over time and at the individual and collective levels. For example, certain individuals may have been motivated to join armed groups for reasons of opportunism rather than political goals. Some opportunist individuals may become progressively politicized or, alternatively, those with political motives may become more opportunist. Crafting an effective DDR process requires an understanding of these different and changing motivations. Furthermore, the stated motives of warring parties and their members may differ significantly from their actual motives or be against international law and principles.", + "Paragraph": "The structures and motivations of armed forces and groups should be assessed. \n It should be kept in mind, however, that these structures and motivations may vary over time and at the individual and collective levels. For example, certain individuals may have been motivated to join armed groups for reasons of opportunism rather than political goals. Some opportunist individuals may become progressively politicized or, alternatively, those with political motives may become more opportunist. Crafting an effective DDR process requires an understanding of these different and changing motivations. Furthermore, the stated motives of warring parties and their members may differ significantly from their actual motives or be against international law and principles.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24283,7 +24283,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 494, - "Paragraph": "The structures and motivations of armed forces and groups should be assessed. \\n It should be kept in mind, however, that these structures and motivations may vary over time and at the individual and collective levels. For example, certain individuals may have been motivated to join armed groups for reasons of opportunism rather than political goals. Some opportunist individuals may become progressively politicized or, alternatively, those with political motives may become more opportunist. Crafting an effective DDR process requires an understanding of these different and changing motivations. Furthermore, the stated motives of warring parties and their members may differ significantly from their actual motives or be against international law and principles.", + "Paragraph": "The structures and motivations of armed forces and groups should be assessed. \n It should be kept in mind, however, that these structures and motivations may vary over time and at the individual and collective levels. For example, certain individuals may have been motivated to join armed groups for reasons of opportunism rather than political goals. Some opportunist individuals may become progressively politicized or, alternatively, those with political motives may become more opportunist. Crafting an effective DDR process requires an understanding of these different and changing motivations. Furthermore, the stated motives of warring parties and their members may differ significantly from their actual motives or be against international law and principles.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24294,14 +24294,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Contextual considerations ", "Heading3": "5.1.2. The structures and motivations of armed forces and groups", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n It should be kept in mind, however, that these structures and motivations may vary over time and at the individual and collective levels.", + "Sentence": "\n It should be kept in mind, however, that these structures and motivations may vary over time and at the individual and collective levels.", "newParagraph": "structure motivation armed force group assessed n kept mind however structure motivation may vary time individual collective level example certain individual may motivated join armed group reason opportunism rather political goal opportunist individual may become progressively politicized alternatively political motif may become opportunist crafting effective ddr process requires understanding different changing motivation furthermore stated motif warring party member may differ significantly actual motif international law principle", "ProcessedSent": "n kept mind however structure motivation may vary time individual collective level", "SentID": 1349 }, { "ParagraphID": 494, - "Paragraph": "The structures and motivations of armed forces and groups should be assessed. \\n It should be kept in mind, however, that these structures and motivations may vary over time and at the individual and collective levels. For example, certain individuals may have been motivated to join armed groups for reasons of opportunism rather than political goals. Some opportunist individuals may become progressively politicized or, alternatively, those with political motives may become more opportunist. Crafting an effective DDR process requires an understanding of these different and changing motivations. Furthermore, the stated motives of warring parties and their members may differ significantly from their actual motives or be against international law and principles.", + "Paragraph": "The structures and motivations of armed forces and groups should be assessed. \n It should be kept in mind, however, that these structures and motivations may vary over time and at the individual and collective levels. For example, certain individuals may have been motivated to join armed groups for reasons of opportunism rather than political goals. Some opportunist individuals may become progressively politicized or, alternatively, those with political motives may become more opportunist. Crafting an effective DDR process requires an understanding of these different and changing motivations. Furthermore, the stated motives of warring parties and their members may differ significantly from their actual motives or be against international law and principles.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24319,7 +24319,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 494, - "Paragraph": "The structures and motivations of armed forces and groups should be assessed. \\n It should be kept in mind, however, that these structures and motivations may vary over time and at the individual and collective levels. For example, certain individuals may have been motivated to join armed groups for reasons of opportunism rather than political goals. Some opportunist individuals may become progressively politicized or, alternatively, those with political motives may become more opportunist. Crafting an effective DDR process requires an understanding of these different and changing motivations. Furthermore, the stated motives of warring parties and their members may differ significantly from their actual motives or be against international law and principles.", + "Paragraph": "The structures and motivations of armed forces and groups should be assessed. \n It should be kept in mind, however, that these structures and motivations may vary over time and at the individual and collective levels. For example, certain individuals may have been motivated to join armed groups for reasons of opportunism rather than political goals. Some opportunist individuals may become progressively politicized or, alternatively, those with political motives may become more opportunist. Crafting an effective DDR process requires an understanding of these different and changing motivations. Furthermore, the stated motives of warring parties and their members may differ significantly from their actual motives or be against international law and principles.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24337,7 +24337,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 494, - "Paragraph": "The structures and motivations of armed forces and groups should be assessed. \\n It should be kept in mind, however, that these structures and motivations may vary over time and at the individual and collective levels. For example, certain individuals may have been motivated to join armed groups for reasons of opportunism rather than political goals. Some opportunist individuals may become progressively politicized or, alternatively, those with political motives may become more opportunist. Crafting an effective DDR process requires an understanding of these different and changing motivations. Furthermore, the stated motives of warring parties and their members may differ significantly from their actual motives or be against international law and principles.", + "Paragraph": "The structures and motivations of armed forces and groups should be assessed. \n It should be kept in mind, however, that these structures and motivations may vary over time and at the individual and collective levels. For example, certain individuals may have been motivated to join armed groups for reasons of opportunism rather than political goals. Some opportunist individuals may become progressively politicized or, alternatively, those with political motives may become more opportunist. Crafting an effective DDR process requires an understanding of these different and changing motivations. Furthermore, the stated motives of warring parties and their members may differ significantly from their actual motives or be against international law and principles.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24355,7 +24355,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 494, - "Paragraph": "The structures and motivations of armed forces and groups should be assessed. \\n It should be kept in mind, however, that these structures and motivations may vary over time and at the individual and collective levels. For example, certain individuals may have been motivated to join armed groups for reasons of opportunism rather than political goals. Some opportunist individuals may become progressively politicized or, alternatively, those with political motives may become more opportunist. Crafting an effective DDR process requires an understanding of these different and changing motivations. Furthermore, the stated motives of warring parties and their members may differ significantly from their actual motives or be against international law and principles.", + "Paragraph": "The structures and motivations of armed forces and groups should be assessed. \n It should be kept in mind, however, that these structures and motivations may vary over time and at the individual and collective levels. For example, certain individuals may have been motivated to join armed groups for reasons of opportunism rather than political goals. Some opportunist individuals may become progressively politicized or, alternatively, those with political motives may become more opportunist. Crafting an effective DDR process requires an understanding of these different and changing motivations. Furthermore, the stated motives of warring parties and their members may differ significantly from their actual motives or be against international law and principles.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24373,7 +24373,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 495, - "Paragraph": "As explained in more detail in Annex B, potential motives may include one or several of the following: \\nPolitical \u2013 seeking to impose or protect a political system, ideology or party. \\nSocial \u2013 seeking to bring about changes in social status, roles or balances of power, discrimination and marginalization. \\nEconomic \u2013 seeking a redistribution or accumulation of wealth, often coupled with joining to escape poverty and to provide for the family. \\nSecurity driven \u2013 seeking to protect a community or group from a real or per- ceived threat. \\nCultural\/spiritual \u2013 seeking to protect or impose values, ideas or principles. \\nReligious \u2013 seeking to advance religious values, customs and ideas. \\nMaterial \u2013 seeking to protect material resources. \\nOpportunistic \u2013 seeking to leverage a situation to achieve any of the above.", + "Paragraph": "As explained in more detail in Annex B, potential motives may include one or several of the following: \nPolitical \u2013 seeking to impose or protect a political system, ideology or party. \nSocial \u2013 seeking to bring about changes in social status, roles or balances of power, discrimination and marginalization. \nEconomic \u2013 seeking a redistribution or accumulation of wealth, often coupled with joining to escape poverty and to provide for the family. \nSecurity driven \u2013 seeking to protect a community or group from a real or per- ceived threat. \nCultural\/spiritual \u2013 seeking to protect or impose values, ideas or principles. \nReligious \u2013 seeking to advance religious values, customs and ideas. \nMaterial \u2013 seeking to protect material resources. \nOpportunistic \u2013 seeking to leverage a situation to achieve any of the above.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24384,14 +24384,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Contextual considerations ", "Heading3": "5.1.2. The structures and motivations of armed forces and groups", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "As explained in more detail in Annex B, potential motives may include one or several of the following: \\nPolitical \u2013 seeking to impose or protect a political system, ideology or party.", + "Sentence": "As explained in more detail in Annex B, potential motives may include one or several of the following: \nPolitical \u2013 seeking to impose or protect a political system, ideology or party.", "newParagraph": "explained detail annex b potential motif may include one several following npolitical seeking impose protect political system ideology party nsocial seeking bring change social status role balance power discrimination marginalization neconomic seeking redistribution accumulation wealth often coupled joining escape poverty provide family nsecurity driven seeking protect community group real per ceived threat nculturalspiritual seeking protect impose value idea principle nreligious seeking advance religious value custom idea nmaterial seeking protect material resource nopportunistic seeking leverage situation achieve", "ProcessedSent": "explained detail annex b potential motif may include one several following npolitical seeking impose protect political system ideology party", "SentID": 1354 }, { "ParagraphID": 495, - "Paragraph": "As explained in more detail in Annex B, potential motives may include one or several of the following: \\nPolitical \u2013 seeking to impose or protect a political system, ideology or party. \\nSocial \u2013 seeking to bring about changes in social status, roles or balances of power, discrimination and marginalization. \\nEconomic \u2013 seeking a redistribution or accumulation of wealth, often coupled with joining to escape poverty and to provide for the family. \\nSecurity driven \u2013 seeking to protect a community or group from a real or per- ceived threat. \\nCultural\/spiritual \u2013 seeking to protect or impose values, ideas or principles. \\nReligious \u2013 seeking to advance religious values, customs and ideas. \\nMaterial \u2013 seeking to protect material resources. \\nOpportunistic \u2013 seeking to leverage a situation to achieve any of the above.", + "Paragraph": "As explained in more detail in Annex B, potential motives may include one or several of the following: \nPolitical \u2013 seeking to impose or protect a political system, ideology or party. \nSocial \u2013 seeking to bring about changes in social status, roles or balances of power, discrimination and marginalization. \nEconomic \u2013 seeking a redistribution or accumulation of wealth, often coupled with joining to escape poverty and to provide for the family. \nSecurity driven \u2013 seeking to protect a community or group from a real or per- ceived threat. \nCultural\/spiritual \u2013 seeking to protect or impose values, ideas or principles. \nReligious \u2013 seeking to advance religious values, customs and ideas. \nMaterial \u2013 seeking to protect material resources. \nOpportunistic \u2013 seeking to leverage a situation to achieve any of the above.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24402,14 +24402,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Contextual considerations ", "Heading3": "5.1.2. The structures and motivations of armed forces and groups", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nSocial \u2013 seeking to bring about changes in social status, roles or balances of power, discrimination and marginalization.", + "Sentence": "\nSocial \u2013 seeking to bring about changes in social status, roles or balances of power, discrimination and marginalization.", "newParagraph": "explained detail annex b potential motif may include one several following npolitical seeking impose protect political system ideology party nsocial seeking bring change social status role balance power discrimination marginalization neconomic seeking redistribution accumulation wealth often coupled joining escape poverty provide family nsecurity driven seeking protect community group real per ceived threat nculturalspiritual seeking protect impose value idea principle nreligious seeking advance religious value custom idea nmaterial seeking protect material resource nopportunistic seeking leverage situation achieve", "ProcessedSent": "nsocial seeking bring change social status role balance power discrimination marginalization", "SentID": 1355 }, { "ParagraphID": 495, - "Paragraph": "As explained in more detail in Annex B, potential motives may include one or several of the following: \\nPolitical \u2013 seeking to impose or protect a political system, ideology or party. \\nSocial \u2013 seeking to bring about changes in social status, roles or balances of power, discrimination and marginalization. \\nEconomic \u2013 seeking a redistribution or accumulation of wealth, often coupled with joining to escape poverty and to provide for the family. \\nSecurity driven \u2013 seeking to protect a community or group from a real or per- ceived threat. \\nCultural\/spiritual \u2013 seeking to protect or impose values, ideas or principles. \\nReligious \u2013 seeking to advance religious values, customs and ideas. \\nMaterial \u2013 seeking to protect material resources. \\nOpportunistic \u2013 seeking to leverage a situation to achieve any of the above.", + "Paragraph": "As explained in more detail in Annex B, potential motives may include one or several of the following: \nPolitical \u2013 seeking to impose or protect a political system, ideology or party. \nSocial \u2013 seeking to bring about changes in social status, roles or balances of power, discrimination and marginalization. \nEconomic \u2013 seeking a redistribution or accumulation of wealth, often coupled with joining to escape poverty and to provide for the family. \nSecurity driven \u2013 seeking to protect a community or group from a real or per- ceived threat. \nCultural\/spiritual \u2013 seeking to protect or impose values, ideas or principles. \nReligious \u2013 seeking to advance religious values, customs and ideas. \nMaterial \u2013 seeking to protect material resources. \nOpportunistic \u2013 seeking to leverage a situation to achieve any of the above.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24420,14 +24420,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Contextual considerations ", "Heading3": "5.1.2. The structures and motivations of armed forces and groups", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nEconomic \u2013 seeking a redistribution or accumulation of wealth, often coupled with joining to escape poverty and to provide for the family.", + "Sentence": "\nEconomic \u2013 seeking a redistribution or accumulation of wealth, often coupled with joining to escape poverty and to provide for the family.", "newParagraph": "explained detail annex b potential motif may include one several following npolitical seeking impose protect political system ideology party nsocial seeking bring change social status role balance power discrimination marginalization neconomic seeking redistribution accumulation wealth often coupled joining escape poverty provide family nsecurity driven seeking protect community group real per ceived threat nculturalspiritual seeking protect impose value idea principle nreligious seeking advance religious value custom idea nmaterial seeking protect material resource nopportunistic seeking leverage situation achieve", "ProcessedSent": "neconomic seeking redistribution accumulation wealth often coupled joining escape poverty provide family", "SentID": 1356 }, { "ParagraphID": 495, - "Paragraph": "As explained in more detail in Annex B, potential motives may include one or several of the following: \\nPolitical \u2013 seeking to impose or protect a political system, ideology or party. \\nSocial \u2013 seeking to bring about changes in social status, roles or balances of power, discrimination and marginalization. \\nEconomic \u2013 seeking a redistribution or accumulation of wealth, often coupled with joining to escape poverty and to provide for the family. \\nSecurity driven \u2013 seeking to protect a community or group from a real or per- ceived threat. \\nCultural\/spiritual \u2013 seeking to protect or impose values, ideas or principles. \\nReligious \u2013 seeking to advance religious values, customs and ideas. \\nMaterial \u2013 seeking to protect material resources. \\nOpportunistic \u2013 seeking to leverage a situation to achieve any of the above.", + "Paragraph": "As explained in more detail in Annex B, potential motives may include one or several of the following: \nPolitical \u2013 seeking to impose or protect a political system, ideology or party. \nSocial \u2013 seeking to bring about changes in social status, roles or balances of power, discrimination and marginalization. \nEconomic \u2013 seeking a redistribution or accumulation of wealth, often coupled with joining to escape poverty and to provide for the family. \nSecurity driven \u2013 seeking to protect a community or group from a real or per- ceived threat. \nCultural\/spiritual \u2013 seeking to protect or impose values, ideas or principles. \nReligious \u2013 seeking to advance religious values, customs and ideas. \nMaterial \u2013 seeking to protect material resources. \nOpportunistic \u2013 seeking to leverage a situation to achieve any of the above.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24438,14 +24438,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Contextual considerations ", "Heading3": "5.1.2. The structures and motivations of armed forces and groups", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nSecurity driven \u2013 seeking to protect a community or group from a real or per- ceived threat.", + "Sentence": "\nSecurity driven \u2013 seeking to protect a community or group from a real or per- ceived threat.", "newParagraph": "explained detail annex b potential motif may include one several following npolitical seeking impose protect political system ideology party nsocial seeking bring change social status role balance power discrimination marginalization neconomic seeking redistribution accumulation wealth often coupled joining escape poverty provide family nsecurity driven seeking protect community group real per ceived threat nculturalspiritual seeking protect impose value idea principle nreligious seeking advance religious value custom idea nmaterial seeking protect material resource nopportunistic seeking leverage situation achieve", "ProcessedSent": "nsecurity driven seeking protect community group real per ceived threat", "SentID": 1357 }, { "ParagraphID": 495, - "Paragraph": "As explained in more detail in Annex B, potential motives may include one or several of the following: \\nPolitical \u2013 seeking to impose or protect a political system, ideology or party. \\nSocial \u2013 seeking to bring about changes in social status, roles or balances of power, discrimination and marginalization. \\nEconomic \u2013 seeking a redistribution or accumulation of wealth, often coupled with joining to escape poverty and to provide for the family. \\nSecurity driven \u2013 seeking to protect a community or group from a real or per- ceived threat. \\nCultural\/spiritual \u2013 seeking to protect or impose values, ideas or principles. \\nReligious \u2013 seeking to advance religious values, customs and ideas. \\nMaterial \u2013 seeking to protect material resources. \\nOpportunistic \u2013 seeking to leverage a situation to achieve any of the above.", + "Paragraph": "As explained in more detail in Annex B, potential motives may include one or several of the following: \nPolitical \u2013 seeking to impose or protect a political system, ideology or party. \nSocial \u2013 seeking to bring about changes in social status, roles or balances of power, discrimination and marginalization. \nEconomic \u2013 seeking a redistribution or accumulation of wealth, often coupled with joining to escape poverty and to provide for the family. \nSecurity driven \u2013 seeking to protect a community or group from a real or per- ceived threat. \nCultural\/spiritual \u2013 seeking to protect or impose values, ideas or principles. \nReligious \u2013 seeking to advance religious values, customs and ideas. \nMaterial \u2013 seeking to protect material resources. \nOpportunistic \u2013 seeking to leverage a situation to achieve any of the above.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24456,14 +24456,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Contextual considerations ", "Heading3": "5.1.2. The structures and motivations of armed forces and groups", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nCultural\/spiritual \u2013 seeking to protect or impose values, ideas or principles.", + "Sentence": "\nCultural\/spiritual \u2013 seeking to protect or impose values, ideas or principles.", "newParagraph": "explained detail annex b potential motif may include one several following npolitical seeking impose protect political system ideology party nsocial seeking bring change social status role balance power discrimination marginalization neconomic seeking redistribution accumulation wealth often coupled joining escape poverty provide family nsecurity driven seeking protect community group real per ceived threat nculturalspiritual seeking protect impose value idea principle nreligious seeking advance religious value custom idea nmaterial seeking protect material resource nopportunistic seeking leverage situation achieve", "ProcessedSent": "nculturalspiritual seeking protect impose value idea principle", "SentID": 1358 }, { "ParagraphID": 495, - "Paragraph": "As explained in more detail in Annex B, potential motives may include one or several of the following: \\nPolitical \u2013 seeking to impose or protect a political system, ideology or party. \\nSocial \u2013 seeking to bring about changes in social status, roles or balances of power, discrimination and marginalization. \\nEconomic \u2013 seeking a redistribution or accumulation of wealth, often coupled with joining to escape poverty and to provide for the family. \\nSecurity driven \u2013 seeking to protect a community or group from a real or per- ceived threat. \\nCultural\/spiritual \u2013 seeking to protect or impose values, ideas or principles. \\nReligious \u2013 seeking to advance religious values, customs and ideas. \\nMaterial \u2013 seeking to protect material resources. \\nOpportunistic \u2013 seeking to leverage a situation to achieve any of the above.", + "Paragraph": "As explained in more detail in Annex B, potential motives may include one or several of the following: \nPolitical \u2013 seeking to impose or protect a political system, ideology or party. \nSocial \u2013 seeking to bring about changes in social status, roles or balances of power, discrimination and marginalization. \nEconomic \u2013 seeking a redistribution or accumulation of wealth, often coupled with joining to escape poverty and to provide for the family. \nSecurity driven \u2013 seeking to protect a community or group from a real or per- ceived threat. \nCultural\/spiritual \u2013 seeking to protect or impose values, ideas or principles. \nReligious \u2013 seeking to advance religious values, customs and ideas. \nMaterial \u2013 seeking to protect material resources. \nOpportunistic \u2013 seeking to leverage a situation to achieve any of the above.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24474,14 +24474,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Contextual considerations ", "Heading3": "5.1.2. The structures and motivations of armed forces and groups", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nReligious \u2013 seeking to advance religious values, customs and ideas.", + "Sentence": "\nReligious \u2013 seeking to advance religious values, customs and ideas.", "newParagraph": "explained detail annex b potential motif may include one several following npolitical seeking impose protect political system ideology party nsocial seeking bring change social status role balance power discrimination marginalization neconomic seeking redistribution accumulation wealth often coupled joining escape poverty provide family nsecurity driven seeking protect community group real per ceived threat nculturalspiritual seeking protect impose value idea principle nreligious seeking advance religious value custom idea nmaterial seeking protect material resource nopportunistic seeking leverage situation achieve", "ProcessedSent": "nreligious seeking advance religious value custom idea", "SentID": 1359 }, { "ParagraphID": 495, - "Paragraph": "As explained in more detail in Annex B, potential motives may include one or several of the following: \\nPolitical \u2013 seeking to impose or protect a political system, ideology or party. \\nSocial \u2013 seeking to bring about changes in social status, roles or balances of power, discrimination and marginalization. \\nEconomic \u2013 seeking a redistribution or accumulation of wealth, often coupled with joining to escape poverty and to provide for the family. \\nSecurity driven \u2013 seeking to protect a community or group from a real or per- ceived threat. \\nCultural\/spiritual \u2013 seeking to protect or impose values, ideas or principles. \\nReligious \u2013 seeking to advance religious values, customs and ideas. \\nMaterial \u2013 seeking to protect material resources. \\nOpportunistic \u2013 seeking to leverage a situation to achieve any of the above.", + "Paragraph": "As explained in more detail in Annex B, potential motives may include one or several of the following: \nPolitical \u2013 seeking to impose or protect a political system, ideology or party. \nSocial \u2013 seeking to bring about changes in social status, roles or balances of power, discrimination and marginalization. \nEconomic \u2013 seeking a redistribution or accumulation of wealth, often coupled with joining to escape poverty and to provide for the family. \nSecurity driven \u2013 seeking to protect a community or group from a real or per- ceived threat. \nCultural\/spiritual \u2013 seeking to protect or impose values, ideas or principles. \nReligious \u2013 seeking to advance religious values, customs and ideas. \nMaterial \u2013 seeking to protect material resources. \nOpportunistic \u2013 seeking to leverage a situation to achieve any of the above.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24492,14 +24492,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Contextual considerations ", "Heading3": "5.1.2. The structures and motivations of armed forces and groups", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nMaterial \u2013 seeking to protect material resources.", + "Sentence": "\nMaterial \u2013 seeking to protect material resources.", "newParagraph": "explained detail annex b potential motif may include one several following npolitical seeking impose protect political system ideology party nsocial seeking bring change social status role balance power discrimination marginalization neconomic seeking redistribution accumulation wealth often coupled joining escape poverty provide family nsecurity driven seeking protect community group real per ceived threat nculturalspiritual seeking protect impose value idea principle nreligious seeking advance religious value custom idea nmaterial seeking protect material resource nopportunistic seeking leverage situation achieve", "ProcessedSent": "nmaterial seeking protect material resource", "SentID": 1360 }, { "ParagraphID": 495, - "Paragraph": "As explained in more detail in Annex B, potential motives may include one or several of the following: \\nPolitical \u2013 seeking to impose or protect a political system, ideology or party. \\nSocial \u2013 seeking to bring about changes in social status, roles or balances of power, discrimination and marginalization. \\nEconomic \u2013 seeking a redistribution or accumulation of wealth, often coupled with joining to escape poverty and to provide for the family. \\nSecurity driven \u2013 seeking to protect a community or group from a real or per- ceived threat. \\nCultural\/spiritual \u2013 seeking to protect or impose values, ideas or principles. \\nReligious \u2013 seeking to advance religious values, customs and ideas. \\nMaterial \u2013 seeking to protect material resources. \\nOpportunistic \u2013 seeking to leverage a situation to achieve any of the above.", + "Paragraph": "As explained in more detail in Annex B, potential motives may include one or several of the following: \nPolitical \u2013 seeking to impose or protect a political system, ideology or party. \nSocial \u2013 seeking to bring about changes in social status, roles or balances of power, discrimination and marginalization. \nEconomic \u2013 seeking a redistribution or accumulation of wealth, often coupled with joining to escape poverty and to provide for the family. \nSecurity driven \u2013 seeking to protect a community or group from a real or per- ceived threat. \nCultural\/spiritual \u2013 seeking to protect or impose values, ideas or principles. \nReligious \u2013 seeking to advance religious values, customs and ideas. \nMaterial \u2013 seeking to protect material resources. \nOpportunistic \u2013 seeking to leverage a situation to achieve any of the above.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24510,14 +24510,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Contextual considerations ", "Heading3": "5.1.2. The structures and motivations of armed forces and groups", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nOpportunistic \u2013 seeking to leverage a situation to achieve any of the above.", + "Sentence": "\nOpportunistic \u2013 seeking to leverage a situation to achieve any of the above.", "newParagraph": "explained detail annex b potential motif may include one several following npolitical seeking impose protect political system ideology party nsocial seeking bring change social status role balance power discrimination marginalization neconomic seeking redistribution accumulation wealth often coupled joining escape poverty provide family nsecurity driven seeking protect community group real per ceived threat nculturalspiritual seeking protect impose value idea principle nreligious seeking advance religious value custom idea nmaterial seeking protect material resource nopportunistic seeking leverage situation achieve", "ProcessedSent": "nopportunistic seeking leverage situation achieve", "SentID": 1361 }, { "ParagraphID": 496, - "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \\n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \\n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \\n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \\n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \\n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \\n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \\n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", + "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24535,7 +24535,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 496, - "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \\n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \\n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \\n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \\n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \\n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \\n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \\n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", + "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24546,14 +24546,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Contextual considerations ", "Heading3": "5.1.2. The structures and motivations of armed forces and groups", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \\n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties.", + "Sentence": "Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties.", "newParagraph": "important undertake thorough analysis armed force group better understand ddr target group design ddr process maximize political buyin analysis armed force group include following n leadership including associated political leader structure see person may influence warring party analysis take account external actor including possible foreign supporter also exiled leader others may control armed group also consider much control leadership combatant extent leadership representative member control representativeness change time n internal group dynamic including balance organization po litical military wing interaction prominent member faction within armed force group influence behaviour ganization internal conflict pattern potential fragmentation presence female fighter woman associated armed force group waafg gender norm group existence pervasiveness sexual violence n associated political leader structure including whether warring party separate political branch integrated politicomilitary movement shape agenda woman involved political structure extent armed group separate political structure history political engagement prior conflict sometimes successful transforming political party although potential may erode prolonged conflict n associated religious leader religious leader personality associated armed group role could play peace negotiation influence warring party help shape outcome peace effort n linkage base given armed group close political base popu lation linkage influence group support weak ened use certain tactic action eg mass atrocity repression base influence armed group effort demobilize combatant affect armed group relation base otherwise push change tactic instance eschewing violence mobilize political base would otherwise reject violence n linkage local national regional elite including influential indi viduals group hold sway armed force group could include business people community religious traditional leader insti tutions trade union cultural grouping diaspora may also important actor providing political economic support community andor armed group n external support regional andor broader international actor net work provide political financial support armed group including basis geopolitical interest might include state sponsor diaspora political exile transnational criminal network ideological affiliation franchising foreign often extremist armed group", "ProcessedSent": "analysis armed force group include following n leadership including associated political leader structure see person may influence warring party", "SentID": 1363 }, { "ParagraphID": 496, - "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \\n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \\n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \\n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \\n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \\n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \\n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \\n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", + "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24571,7 +24571,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 496, - "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \\n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \\n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \\n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \\n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \\n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \\n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \\n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", + "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24589,7 +24589,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 496, - "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \\n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \\n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \\n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \\n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \\n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \\n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \\n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", + "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24607,7 +24607,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 496, - "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \\n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \\n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \\n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \\n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \\n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \\n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \\n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", + "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24618,14 +24618,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Contextual considerations ", "Heading3": "5.1.2. The structures and motivations of armed forces and groups", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence.", + "Sentence": "\n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence.", "newParagraph": "important undertake thorough analysis armed force group better understand ddr target group design ddr process maximize political buyin analysis armed force group include following n leadership including associated political leader structure see person may influence warring party analysis take account external actor including possible foreign supporter also exiled leader others may control armed group also consider much control leadership combatant extent leadership representative member control representativeness change time n internal group dynamic including balance organization po litical military wing interaction prominent member faction within armed force group influence behaviour ganization internal conflict pattern potential fragmentation presence female fighter woman associated armed force group waafg gender norm group existence pervasiveness sexual violence n associated political leader structure including whether warring party separate political branch integrated politicomilitary movement shape agenda woman involved political structure extent armed group separate political structure history political engagement prior conflict sometimes successful transforming political party although potential may erode prolonged conflict n associated religious leader religious leader personality associated armed group role could play peace negotiation influence warring party help shape outcome peace effort n linkage base given armed group close political base popu lation linkage influence group support weak ened use certain tactic action eg mass atrocity repression base influence armed group effort demobilize combatant affect armed group relation base otherwise push change tactic instance eschewing violence mobilize political base would otherwise reject violence n linkage local national regional elite including influential indi viduals group hold sway armed force group could include business people community religious traditional leader insti tutions trade union cultural grouping diaspora may also important actor providing political economic support community andor armed group n external support regional andor broader international actor net work provide political financial support armed group including basis geopolitical interest might include state sponsor diaspora political exile transnational criminal network ideological affiliation franchising foreign often extremist armed group", "ProcessedSent": "n internal group dynamic including balance organization po litical military wing interaction prominent member faction within armed force group influence behaviour ganization internal conflict pattern potential fragmentation presence female fighter woman associated armed force group waafg gender norm group existence pervasiveness sexual violence", "SentID": 1367 }, { "ParagraphID": 496, - "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \\n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \\n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \\n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \\n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \\n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \\n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \\n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", + "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24636,14 +24636,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Contextual considerations ", "Heading3": "5.1.2. The structures and motivations of armed forces and groups", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda.", + "Sentence": "\n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda.", "newParagraph": "important undertake thorough analysis armed force group better understand ddr target group design ddr process maximize political buyin analysis armed force group include following n leadership including associated political leader structure see person may influence warring party analysis take account external actor including possible foreign supporter also exiled leader others may control armed group also consider much control leadership combatant extent leadership representative member control representativeness change time n internal group dynamic including balance organization po litical military wing interaction prominent member faction within armed force group influence behaviour ganization internal conflict pattern potential fragmentation presence female fighter woman associated armed force group waafg gender norm group existence pervasiveness sexual violence n associated political leader structure including whether warring party separate political branch integrated politicomilitary movement shape agenda woman involved political structure extent armed group separate political structure history political engagement prior conflict sometimes successful transforming political party although potential may erode prolonged conflict n associated religious leader religious leader personality associated armed group role could play peace negotiation influence warring party help shape outcome peace effort n linkage base given armed group close political base popu lation linkage influence group support weak ened use certain tactic action eg mass atrocity repression base influence armed group effort demobilize combatant affect armed group relation base otherwise push change tactic instance eschewing violence mobilize political base would otherwise reject violence n linkage local national regional elite including influential indi viduals group hold sway armed force group could include business people community religious traditional leader insti tutions trade union cultural grouping diaspora may also important actor providing political economic support community andor armed group n external support regional andor broader international actor net work provide political financial support armed group including basis geopolitical interest might include state sponsor diaspora political exile transnational criminal network ideological affiliation franchising foreign often extremist armed group", "ProcessedSent": "n associated political leader structure including whether warring party separate political branch integrated politicomilitary movement shape agenda", "SentID": 1368 }, { "ParagraphID": 496, - "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \\n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \\n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \\n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \\n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \\n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \\n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \\n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", + "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24661,7 +24661,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 496, - "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \\n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \\n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \\n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \\n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \\n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \\n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \\n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", + "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24679,7 +24679,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 496, - "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \\n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \\n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \\n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \\n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \\n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \\n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \\n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", + "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24690,14 +24690,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Contextual considerations ", "Heading3": "5.1.2. The structures and motivations of armed forces and groups", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups?", + "Sentence": "\n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups?", "newParagraph": "important undertake thorough analysis armed force group better understand ddr target group design ddr process maximize political buyin analysis armed force group include following n leadership including associated political leader structure see person may influence warring party analysis take account external actor including possible foreign supporter also exiled leader others may control armed group also consider much control leadership combatant extent leadership representative member control representativeness change time n internal group dynamic including balance organization po litical military wing interaction prominent member faction within armed force group influence behaviour ganization internal conflict pattern potential fragmentation presence female fighter woman associated armed force group waafg gender norm group existence pervasiveness sexual violence n associated political leader structure including whether warring party separate political branch integrated politicomilitary movement shape agenda woman involved political structure extent armed group separate political structure history political engagement prior conflict sometimes successful transforming political party although potential may erode prolonged conflict n associated religious leader religious leader personality associated armed group role could play peace negotiation influence warring party help shape outcome peace effort n linkage base given armed group close political base popu lation linkage influence group support weak ened use certain tactic action eg mass atrocity repression base influence armed group effort demobilize combatant affect armed group relation base otherwise push change tactic instance eschewing violence mobilize political base would otherwise reject violence n linkage local national regional elite including influential indi viduals group hold sway armed force group could include business people community religious traditional leader insti tutions trade union cultural grouping diaspora may also important actor providing political economic support community andor armed group n external support regional andor broader international actor net work provide political financial support armed group including basis geopolitical interest might include state sponsor diaspora political exile transnational criminal network ideological affiliation franchising foreign often extremist armed group", "ProcessedSent": "n associated religious leader religious leader personality associated armed group", "SentID": 1371 }, { "ParagraphID": 496, - "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \\n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \\n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \\n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \\n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \\n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \\n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \\n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", + "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24715,7 +24715,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 496, - "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \\n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \\n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \\n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \\n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \\n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \\n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \\n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", + "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24733,7 +24733,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 496, - "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \\n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \\n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \\n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \\n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \\n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \\n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \\n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", + "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24744,14 +24744,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Contextual considerations ", "Heading3": "5.1.2. The structures and motivations of armed forces and groups", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group?", + "Sentence": "\n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group?", "newParagraph": "important undertake thorough analysis armed force group better understand ddr target group design ddr process maximize political buyin analysis armed force group include following n leadership including associated political leader structure see person may influence warring party analysis take account external actor including possible foreign supporter also exiled leader others may control armed group also consider much control leadership combatant extent leadership representative member control representativeness change time n internal group dynamic including balance organization po litical military wing interaction prominent member faction within armed force group influence behaviour ganization internal conflict pattern potential fragmentation presence female fighter woman associated armed force group waafg gender norm group existence pervasiveness sexual violence n associated political leader structure including whether warring party separate political branch integrated politicomilitary movement shape agenda woman involved political structure extent armed group separate political structure history political engagement prior conflict sometimes successful transforming political party although potential may erode prolonged conflict n associated religious leader religious leader personality associated armed group role could play peace negotiation influence warring party help shape outcome peace effort n linkage base given armed group close political base popu lation linkage influence group support weak ened use certain tactic action eg mass atrocity repression base influence armed group effort demobilize combatant affect armed group relation base otherwise push change tactic instance eschewing violence mobilize political base would otherwise reject violence n linkage local national regional elite including influential indi viduals group hold sway armed force group could include business people community religious traditional leader insti tutions trade union cultural grouping diaspora may also important actor providing political economic support community andor armed group n external support regional andor broader international actor net work provide political financial support armed group including basis geopolitical interest might include state sponsor diaspora political exile transnational criminal network ideological affiliation franchising foreign often extremist armed group", "ProcessedSent": "n linkage base given armed group close political base popu lation linkage influence group", "SentID": 1374 }, { "ParagraphID": 496, - "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \\n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \\n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \\n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \\n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \\n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \\n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \\n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", + "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24769,7 +24769,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 496, - "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \\n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \\n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \\n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \\n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \\n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \\n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \\n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", + "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24787,7 +24787,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 496, - "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \\n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \\n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \\n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \\n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \\n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \\n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \\n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", + "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24798,14 +24798,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Contextual considerations ", "Heading3": "5.1.2. The structures and motivations of armed forces and groups", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups.", + "Sentence": "\n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups.", "newParagraph": "important undertake thorough analysis armed force group better understand ddr target group design ddr process maximize political buyin analysis armed force group include following n leadership including associated political leader structure see person may influence warring party analysis take account external actor including possible foreign supporter also exiled leader others may control armed group also consider much control leadership combatant extent leadership representative member control representativeness change time n internal group dynamic including balance organization po litical military wing interaction prominent member faction within armed force group influence behaviour ganization internal conflict pattern potential fragmentation presence female fighter woman associated armed force group waafg gender norm group existence pervasiveness sexual violence n associated political leader structure including whether warring party separate political branch integrated politicomilitary movement shape agenda woman involved political structure extent armed group separate political structure history political engagement prior conflict sometimes successful transforming political party although potential may erode prolonged conflict n associated religious leader religious leader personality associated armed group role could play peace negotiation influence warring party help shape outcome peace effort n linkage base given armed group close political base popu lation linkage influence group support weak ened use certain tactic action eg mass atrocity repression base influence armed group effort demobilize combatant affect armed group relation base otherwise push change tactic instance eschewing violence mobilize political base would otherwise reject violence n linkage local national regional elite including influential indi viduals group hold sway armed force group could include business people community religious traditional leader insti tutions trade union cultural grouping diaspora may also important actor providing political economic support community andor armed group n external support regional andor broader international actor net work provide political financial support armed group including basis geopolitical interest might include state sponsor diaspora political exile transnational criminal network ideological affiliation franchising foreign often extremist armed group", "ProcessedSent": "n linkage local national regional elite including influential indi viduals group hold sway armed force group", "SentID": 1377 }, { "ParagraphID": 496, - "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \\n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \\n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \\n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \\n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \\n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \\n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \\n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", + "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24823,7 +24823,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 496, - "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \\n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \\n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \\n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \\n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \\n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \\n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \\n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", + "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24841,7 +24841,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 496, - "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \\n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \\n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \\n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \\n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \\n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \\n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \\n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", + "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24852,14 +24852,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Contextual considerations ", "Heading3": "5.1.2. The structures and motivations of armed forces and groups", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests?", + "Sentence": "\n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests?", "newParagraph": "important undertake thorough analysis armed force group better understand ddr target group design ddr process maximize political buyin analysis armed force group include following n leadership including associated political leader structure see person may influence warring party analysis take account external actor including possible foreign supporter also exiled leader others may control armed group also consider much control leadership combatant extent leadership representative member control representativeness change time n internal group dynamic including balance organization po litical military wing interaction prominent member faction within armed force group influence behaviour ganization internal conflict pattern potential fragmentation presence female fighter woman associated armed force group waafg gender norm group existence pervasiveness sexual violence n associated political leader structure including whether warring party separate political branch integrated politicomilitary movement shape agenda woman involved political structure extent armed group separate political structure history political engagement prior conflict sometimes successful transforming political party although potential may erode prolonged conflict n associated religious leader religious leader personality associated armed group role could play peace negotiation influence warring party help shape outcome peace effort n linkage base given armed group close political base popu lation linkage influence group support weak ened use certain tactic action eg mass atrocity repression base influence armed group effort demobilize combatant affect armed group relation base otherwise push change tactic instance eschewing violence mobilize political base would otherwise reject violence n linkage local national regional elite including influential indi viduals group hold sway armed force group could include business people community religious traditional leader insti tutions trade union cultural grouping diaspora may also important actor providing political economic support community andor armed group n external support regional andor broader international actor net work provide political financial support armed group including basis geopolitical interest might include state sponsor diaspora political exile transnational criminal network ideological affiliation franchising foreign often extremist armed group", "ProcessedSent": "n external support regional andor broader international actor net work provide political financial support armed group including basis geopolitical interest", "SentID": 1380 }, { "ParagraphID": 496, - "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \\n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \\n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \\n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \\n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \\n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \\n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \\n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", + "Paragraph": "It is important to undertake a thorough analysis of armed forces and groups so as to better understand the DDR target groups and to design DDR processes that maximize political buy-in. Analysis of armed forces and groups should include the following: \n Leadership: Including associated political leaders or structures (see below) and other persons who may have influence over the warring parties. The analysis should take into account external actors, including possible foreign supporters but also exiled leaders or others who may have some control over armed groups. It should also consider how much control the leadership has over the combatants and to what extent the leadership is representative of its members. Both control and representativeness can change over time. \n Internal group dynamics: Including the balance between an organization\u2019s po- litical and military wings, interactions between prominent members or factions within an armed force or group and how they influence the behaviour of the or- ganization, internal conflict patterns and potential fragmentation, the presence of female fighters or women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG), gender norms in the group, and the existence and pervasiveness of sexual violence. \n Associated political leaders and structures: Including whether warring parties have a separate political branch or are integrated politico-military movements and how this shapes their agenda. Are women involved in political structures, and if so to what extent? Armed groups with separate political structures or a history of political engagement prior to the conflict have sometimes been more successful at transforming themselves into political parties, although this potential may erode during a prolonged conflict. \n Associated religious leaders: Are religious leaders or personalities associated with the armed groups? What role could they play in peace negotiations? Do they have influence on the warring parties, and how can they help to shape the outcome of peace efforts? \n Linkages with their base: Is a given armed group close to a political base or a popu- lation, and how do these linkages influence the group? Has this support been weak- ened by the use of certain tactics or actions (e.g., mass atrocities), or will repression of its base influence the armed group? Will efforts to demobilize combatants affect the armed group\u2019s relations with its base or otherwise push it to change tactics \u2013 for instance eschewing violence so as to mobilize a political base that would otherwise reject violence. \n Linkages with local, national and regional elites: Including influential indi- viduals or groups who hold sway over the armed forces and groups. These could include business people or communities, religious or traditional leaders or insti- tutions such as trade unions or cultural groupings. The diaspora may also be an important actor, providing political and economic support to communities and\/or armed groups. \n External support: Are there regional and\/or broader international actors or net- works that provide political and financial support to armed groups, including on the basis of geopolitical interests? This might include State sponsors, diaspora or political exiles, transnational criminal networks or ideological affiliation and \u2018franchising\u2019 with foreign, often extremist, armed groups.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24877,7 +24877,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 497, - "Paragraph": "The way a conflict ends can influence the political dynamics of DDR. The following scenarios should be considered: \\n A clear victor: This usually results in a \u2018victor\u2019s peace\u2019, where the winner can \u2018im- pose\u2019 demands on the party that lost the conflict. This may mean that the armed structures of the victor are preserved, while the losing party will be the one tar- geted for DDR. Less emphasis may be placed on the reintegration of the defeated combatants, and the stigma of being an ex-combatant or person formerly associated with an armed force or group (including children associated with armed forces and groups [CAAFG] and WAAFG) is compounded by that of having been a part of a defeated group, resulting in increased marginalization, exclusion and discrim- ination. The victorious group may seek to dominate the new security structures. \\n A negotiated process: At the national level, this is the most common form of con- flict resolution and often results in a comprehensive peace agreement (CPA) that addresses the political aspects of a conflict and might include provisions for DDR (this is considered a prerequisite for a DDR programme). Negotiated processes can also lead to local-level peace agreements, which can be followed by DDR- related tools such as CVR and transitional weapons and ammunition management (WAM) or reintegration support. DDR processes that are the outcome of negotiations (whether local or national) are more likely to be acceptable to warring parties. However, unless expert advice is provided, the DDR-related clauses in such agree- ments can be unrealistic. \\n Partial peace: In some conflicts the multiplicity of armed groups may result in peace processes that are not fully inclusive, since some of the armed groups are excluded from or refuse to sign the agreement. This can be a disincentive for signatory armed groups to disarm and demobilize due to fear for their security and that of the population they represent, concerns over loss of territory to a non- signatory armed group or uncertainty about how their political position might be affected should other armed groups eventually join the peace process.", + "Paragraph": "The way a conflict ends can influence the political dynamics of DDR. The following scenarios should be considered: \n A clear victor: This usually results in a \u2018victor\u2019s peace\u2019, where the winner can \u2018im- pose\u2019 demands on the party that lost the conflict. This may mean that the armed structures of the victor are preserved, while the losing party will be the one tar- geted for DDR. Less emphasis may be placed on the reintegration of the defeated combatants, and the stigma of being an ex-combatant or person formerly associated with an armed force or group (including children associated with armed forces and groups [CAAFG] and WAAFG) is compounded by that of having been a part of a defeated group, resulting in increased marginalization, exclusion and discrim- ination. The victorious group may seek to dominate the new security structures. \n A negotiated process: At the national level, this is the most common form of con- flict resolution and often results in a comprehensive peace agreement (CPA) that addresses the political aspects of a conflict and might include provisions for DDR (this is considered a prerequisite for a DDR programme). Negotiated processes can also lead to local-level peace agreements, which can be followed by DDR- related tools such as CVR and transitional weapons and ammunition management (WAM) or reintegration support. DDR processes that are the outcome of negotiations (whether local or national) are more likely to be acceptable to warring parties. However, unless expert advice is provided, the DDR-related clauses in such agree- ments can be unrealistic. \n Partial peace: In some conflicts the multiplicity of armed groups may result in peace processes that are not fully inclusive, since some of the armed groups are excluded from or refuse to sign the agreement. This can be a disincentive for signatory armed groups to disarm and demobilize due to fear for their security and that of the population they represent, concerns over loss of territory to a non- signatory armed group or uncertainty about how their political position might be affected should other armed groups eventually join the peace process.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24895,7 +24895,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 497, - "Paragraph": "The way a conflict ends can influence the political dynamics of DDR. The following scenarios should be considered: \\n A clear victor: This usually results in a \u2018victor\u2019s peace\u2019, where the winner can \u2018im- pose\u2019 demands on the party that lost the conflict. This may mean that the armed structures of the victor are preserved, while the losing party will be the one tar- geted for DDR. Less emphasis may be placed on the reintegration of the defeated combatants, and the stigma of being an ex-combatant or person formerly associated with an armed force or group (including children associated with armed forces and groups [CAAFG] and WAAFG) is compounded by that of having been a part of a defeated group, resulting in increased marginalization, exclusion and discrim- ination. The victorious group may seek to dominate the new security structures. \\n A negotiated process: At the national level, this is the most common form of con- flict resolution and often results in a comprehensive peace agreement (CPA) that addresses the political aspects of a conflict and might include provisions for DDR (this is considered a prerequisite for a DDR programme). Negotiated processes can also lead to local-level peace agreements, which can be followed by DDR- related tools such as CVR and transitional weapons and ammunition management (WAM) or reintegration support. DDR processes that are the outcome of negotiations (whether local or national) are more likely to be acceptable to warring parties. However, unless expert advice is provided, the DDR-related clauses in such agree- ments can be unrealistic. \\n Partial peace: In some conflicts the multiplicity of armed groups may result in peace processes that are not fully inclusive, since some of the armed groups are excluded from or refuse to sign the agreement. This can be a disincentive for signatory armed groups to disarm and demobilize due to fear for their security and that of the population they represent, concerns over loss of territory to a non- signatory armed group or uncertainty about how their political position might be affected should other armed groups eventually join the peace process.", + "Paragraph": "The way a conflict ends can influence the political dynamics of DDR. The following scenarios should be considered: \n A clear victor: This usually results in a \u2018victor\u2019s peace\u2019, where the winner can \u2018im- pose\u2019 demands on the party that lost the conflict. This may mean that the armed structures of the victor are preserved, while the losing party will be the one tar- geted for DDR. Less emphasis may be placed on the reintegration of the defeated combatants, and the stigma of being an ex-combatant or person formerly associated with an armed force or group (including children associated with armed forces and groups [CAAFG] and WAAFG) is compounded by that of having been a part of a defeated group, resulting in increased marginalization, exclusion and discrim- ination. The victorious group may seek to dominate the new security structures. \n A negotiated process: At the national level, this is the most common form of con- flict resolution and often results in a comprehensive peace agreement (CPA) that addresses the political aspects of a conflict and might include provisions for DDR (this is considered a prerequisite for a DDR programme). Negotiated processes can also lead to local-level peace agreements, which can be followed by DDR- related tools such as CVR and transitional weapons and ammunition management (WAM) or reintegration support. DDR processes that are the outcome of negotiations (whether local or national) are more likely to be acceptable to warring parties. However, unless expert advice is provided, the DDR-related clauses in such agree- ments can be unrealistic. \n Partial peace: In some conflicts the multiplicity of armed groups may result in peace processes that are not fully inclusive, since some of the armed groups are excluded from or refuse to sign the agreement. This can be a disincentive for signatory armed groups to disarm and demobilize due to fear for their security and that of the population they represent, concerns over loss of territory to a non- signatory armed group or uncertainty about how their political position might be affected should other armed groups eventually join the peace process.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24906,14 +24906,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Contextual considerations ", "Heading3": "5.1.3 Conflict outcomes", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The following scenarios should be considered: \\n A clear victor: This usually results in a \u2018victor\u2019s peace\u2019, where the winner can \u2018im- pose\u2019 demands on the party that lost the conflict.", + "Sentence": "The following scenarios should be considered: \n A clear victor: This usually results in a \u2018victor\u2019s peace\u2019, where the winner can \u2018im- pose\u2019 demands on the party that lost the conflict.", "newParagraph": "way conflict end influence political dynamic ddr following scenario considered n clear victor usually result victor peace winner im pose demand party lost conflict may mean armed structure victor preserved losing party one tar geted ddr le emphasis may placed reintegration defeated combatant stigma excombatant person formerly associated armed force group including child associated armed force group caafg waafg compounded part defeated group resulting increased marginalization exclusion discrim ination victorious group may seek dominate new security structure n negotiated process national level common form con flict resolution often result comprehensive peace agreement cpa address political aspect conflict might include provision ddr considered prerequisite ddr programme negotiated process also lead locallevel peace agreement followed ddr related tool cvr transitional weapon ammunition management wam reintegration support ddr process outcome negotiation whether local national likely acceptable warring party however unless expert advice provided ddrrelated clause agree ments unrealistic n partial peace conflict multiplicity armed group may result peace process fully inclusive since armed group excluded refuse sign agreement disincentive signatory armed group disarm demobilize due fear security population represent concern loss territory non signatory armed group uncertainty political position might affected armed group eventually join peace process", "ProcessedSent": "following scenario considered n clear victor usually result victor peace winner im pose demand party lost conflict", "SentID": 1383 }, { "ParagraphID": 497, - "Paragraph": "The way a conflict ends can influence the political dynamics of DDR. The following scenarios should be considered: \\n A clear victor: This usually results in a \u2018victor\u2019s peace\u2019, where the winner can \u2018im- pose\u2019 demands on the party that lost the conflict. This may mean that the armed structures of the victor are preserved, while the losing party will be the one tar- geted for DDR. Less emphasis may be placed on the reintegration of the defeated combatants, and the stigma of being an ex-combatant or person formerly associated with an armed force or group (including children associated with armed forces and groups [CAAFG] and WAAFG) is compounded by that of having been a part of a defeated group, resulting in increased marginalization, exclusion and discrim- ination. The victorious group may seek to dominate the new security structures. \\n A negotiated process: At the national level, this is the most common form of con- flict resolution and often results in a comprehensive peace agreement (CPA) that addresses the political aspects of a conflict and might include provisions for DDR (this is considered a prerequisite for a DDR programme). Negotiated processes can also lead to local-level peace agreements, which can be followed by DDR- related tools such as CVR and transitional weapons and ammunition management (WAM) or reintegration support. DDR processes that are the outcome of negotiations (whether local or national) are more likely to be acceptable to warring parties. However, unless expert advice is provided, the DDR-related clauses in such agree- ments can be unrealistic. \\n Partial peace: In some conflicts the multiplicity of armed groups may result in peace processes that are not fully inclusive, since some of the armed groups are excluded from or refuse to sign the agreement. This can be a disincentive for signatory armed groups to disarm and demobilize due to fear for their security and that of the population they represent, concerns over loss of territory to a non- signatory armed group or uncertainty about how their political position might be affected should other armed groups eventually join the peace process.", + "Paragraph": "The way a conflict ends can influence the political dynamics of DDR. The following scenarios should be considered: \n A clear victor: This usually results in a \u2018victor\u2019s peace\u2019, where the winner can \u2018im- pose\u2019 demands on the party that lost the conflict. This may mean that the armed structures of the victor are preserved, while the losing party will be the one tar- geted for DDR. Less emphasis may be placed on the reintegration of the defeated combatants, and the stigma of being an ex-combatant or person formerly associated with an armed force or group (including children associated with armed forces and groups [CAAFG] and WAAFG) is compounded by that of having been a part of a defeated group, resulting in increased marginalization, exclusion and discrim- ination. The victorious group may seek to dominate the new security structures. \n A negotiated process: At the national level, this is the most common form of con- flict resolution and often results in a comprehensive peace agreement (CPA) that addresses the political aspects of a conflict and might include provisions for DDR (this is considered a prerequisite for a DDR programme). Negotiated processes can also lead to local-level peace agreements, which can be followed by DDR- related tools such as CVR and transitional weapons and ammunition management (WAM) or reintegration support. DDR processes that are the outcome of negotiations (whether local or national) are more likely to be acceptable to warring parties. However, unless expert advice is provided, the DDR-related clauses in such agree- ments can be unrealistic. \n Partial peace: In some conflicts the multiplicity of armed groups may result in peace processes that are not fully inclusive, since some of the armed groups are excluded from or refuse to sign the agreement. This can be a disincentive for signatory armed groups to disarm and demobilize due to fear for their security and that of the population they represent, concerns over loss of territory to a non- signatory armed group or uncertainty about how their political position might be affected should other armed groups eventually join the peace process.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24931,7 +24931,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 497, - "Paragraph": "The way a conflict ends can influence the political dynamics of DDR. The following scenarios should be considered: \\n A clear victor: This usually results in a \u2018victor\u2019s peace\u2019, where the winner can \u2018im- pose\u2019 demands on the party that lost the conflict. This may mean that the armed structures of the victor are preserved, while the losing party will be the one tar- geted for DDR. Less emphasis may be placed on the reintegration of the defeated combatants, and the stigma of being an ex-combatant or person formerly associated with an armed force or group (including children associated with armed forces and groups [CAAFG] and WAAFG) is compounded by that of having been a part of a defeated group, resulting in increased marginalization, exclusion and discrim- ination. The victorious group may seek to dominate the new security structures. \\n A negotiated process: At the national level, this is the most common form of con- flict resolution and often results in a comprehensive peace agreement (CPA) that addresses the political aspects of a conflict and might include provisions for DDR (this is considered a prerequisite for a DDR programme). Negotiated processes can also lead to local-level peace agreements, which can be followed by DDR- related tools such as CVR and transitional weapons and ammunition management (WAM) or reintegration support. DDR processes that are the outcome of negotiations (whether local or national) are more likely to be acceptable to warring parties. However, unless expert advice is provided, the DDR-related clauses in such agree- ments can be unrealistic. \\n Partial peace: In some conflicts the multiplicity of armed groups may result in peace processes that are not fully inclusive, since some of the armed groups are excluded from or refuse to sign the agreement. This can be a disincentive for signatory armed groups to disarm and demobilize due to fear for their security and that of the population they represent, concerns over loss of territory to a non- signatory armed group or uncertainty about how their political position might be affected should other armed groups eventually join the peace process.", + "Paragraph": "The way a conflict ends can influence the political dynamics of DDR. The following scenarios should be considered: \n A clear victor: This usually results in a \u2018victor\u2019s peace\u2019, where the winner can \u2018im- pose\u2019 demands on the party that lost the conflict. This may mean that the armed structures of the victor are preserved, while the losing party will be the one tar- geted for DDR. Less emphasis may be placed on the reintegration of the defeated combatants, and the stigma of being an ex-combatant or person formerly associated with an armed force or group (including children associated with armed forces and groups [CAAFG] and WAAFG) is compounded by that of having been a part of a defeated group, resulting in increased marginalization, exclusion and discrim- ination. The victorious group may seek to dominate the new security structures. \n A negotiated process: At the national level, this is the most common form of con- flict resolution and often results in a comprehensive peace agreement (CPA) that addresses the political aspects of a conflict and might include provisions for DDR (this is considered a prerequisite for a DDR programme). Negotiated processes can also lead to local-level peace agreements, which can be followed by DDR- related tools such as CVR and transitional weapons and ammunition management (WAM) or reintegration support. DDR processes that are the outcome of negotiations (whether local or national) are more likely to be acceptable to warring parties. However, unless expert advice is provided, the DDR-related clauses in such agree- ments can be unrealistic. \n Partial peace: In some conflicts the multiplicity of armed groups may result in peace processes that are not fully inclusive, since some of the armed groups are excluded from or refuse to sign the agreement. This can be a disincentive for signatory armed groups to disarm and demobilize due to fear for their security and that of the population they represent, concerns over loss of territory to a non- signatory armed group or uncertainty about how their political position might be affected should other armed groups eventually join the peace process.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24949,7 +24949,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 497, - "Paragraph": "The way a conflict ends can influence the political dynamics of DDR. The following scenarios should be considered: \\n A clear victor: This usually results in a \u2018victor\u2019s peace\u2019, where the winner can \u2018im- pose\u2019 demands on the party that lost the conflict. This may mean that the armed structures of the victor are preserved, while the losing party will be the one tar- geted for DDR. Less emphasis may be placed on the reintegration of the defeated combatants, and the stigma of being an ex-combatant or person formerly associated with an armed force or group (including children associated with armed forces and groups [CAAFG] and WAAFG) is compounded by that of having been a part of a defeated group, resulting in increased marginalization, exclusion and discrim- ination. The victorious group may seek to dominate the new security structures. \\n A negotiated process: At the national level, this is the most common form of con- flict resolution and often results in a comprehensive peace agreement (CPA) that addresses the political aspects of a conflict and might include provisions for DDR (this is considered a prerequisite for a DDR programme). Negotiated processes can also lead to local-level peace agreements, which can be followed by DDR- related tools such as CVR and transitional weapons and ammunition management (WAM) or reintegration support. DDR processes that are the outcome of negotiations (whether local or national) are more likely to be acceptable to warring parties. However, unless expert advice is provided, the DDR-related clauses in such agree- ments can be unrealistic. \\n Partial peace: In some conflicts the multiplicity of armed groups may result in peace processes that are not fully inclusive, since some of the armed groups are excluded from or refuse to sign the agreement. This can be a disincentive for signatory armed groups to disarm and demobilize due to fear for their security and that of the population they represent, concerns over loss of territory to a non- signatory armed group or uncertainty about how their political position might be affected should other armed groups eventually join the peace process.", + "Paragraph": "The way a conflict ends can influence the political dynamics of DDR. The following scenarios should be considered: \n A clear victor: This usually results in a \u2018victor\u2019s peace\u2019, where the winner can \u2018im- pose\u2019 demands on the party that lost the conflict. This may mean that the armed structures of the victor are preserved, while the losing party will be the one tar- geted for DDR. Less emphasis may be placed on the reintegration of the defeated combatants, and the stigma of being an ex-combatant or person formerly associated with an armed force or group (including children associated with armed forces and groups [CAAFG] and WAAFG) is compounded by that of having been a part of a defeated group, resulting in increased marginalization, exclusion and discrim- ination. The victorious group may seek to dominate the new security structures. \n A negotiated process: At the national level, this is the most common form of con- flict resolution and often results in a comprehensive peace agreement (CPA) that addresses the political aspects of a conflict and might include provisions for DDR (this is considered a prerequisite for a DDR programme). Negotiated processes can also lead to local-level peace agreements, which can be followed by DDR- related tools such as CVR and transitional weapons and ammunition management (WAM) or reintegration support. DDR processes that are the outcome of negotiations (whether local or national) are more likely to be acceptable to warring parties. However, unless expert advice is provided, the DDR-related clauses in such agree- ments can be unrealistic. \n Partial peace: In some conflicts the multiplicity of armed groups may result in peace processes that are not fully inclusive, since some of the armed groups are excluded from or refuse to sign the agreement. This can be a disincentive for signatory armed groups to disarm and demobilize due to fear for their security and that of the population they represent, concerns over loss of territory to a non- signatory armed group or uncertainty about how their political position might be affected should other armed groups eventually join the peace process.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24967,7 +24967,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 497, - "Paragraph": "The way a conflict ends can influence the political dynamics of DDR. The following scenarios should be considered: \\n A clear victor: This usually results in a \u2018victor\u2019s peace\u2019, where the winner can \u2018im- pose\u2019 demands on the party that lost the conflict. This may mean that the armed structures of the victor are preserved, while the losing party will be the one tar- geted for DDR. Less emphasis may be placed on the reintegration of the defeated combatants, and the stigma of being an ex-combatant or person formerly associated with an armed force or group (including children associated with armed forces and groups [CAAFG] and WAAFG) is compounded by that of having been a part of a defeated group, resulting in increased marginalization, exclusion and discrim- ination. The victorious group may seek to dominate the new security structures. \\n A negotiated process: At the national level, this is the most common form of con- flict resolution and often results in a comprehensive peace agreement (CPA) that addresses the political aspects of a conflict and might include provisions for DDR (this is considered a prerequisite for a DDR programme). Negotiated processes can also lead to local-level peace agreements, which can be followed by DDR- related tools such as CVR and transitional weapons and ammunition management (WAM) or reintegration support. DDR processes that are the outcome of negotiations (whether local or national) are more likely to be acceptable to warring parties. However, unless expert advice is provided, the DDR-related clauses in such agree- ments can be unrealistic. \\n Partial peace: In some conflicts the multiplicity of armed groups may result in peace processes that are not fully inclusive, since some of the armed groups are excluded from or refuse to sign the agreement. This can be a disincentive for signatory armed groups to disarm and demobilize due to fear for their security and that of the population they represent, concerns over loss of territory to a non- signatory armed group or uncertainty about how their political position might be affected should other armed groups eventually join the peace process.", + "Paragraph": "The way a conflict ends can influence the political dynamics of DDR. The following scenarios should be considered: \n A clear victor: This usually results in a \u2018victor\u2019s peace\u2019, where the winner can \u2018im- pose\u2019 demands on the party that lost the conflict. This may mean that the armed structures of the victor are preserved, while the losing party will be the one tar- geted for DDR. Less emphasis may be placed on the reintegration of the defeated combatants, and the stigma of being an ex-combatant or person formerly associated with an armed force or group (including children associated with armed forces and groups [CAAFG] and WAAFG) is compounded by that of having been a part of a defeated group, resulting in increased marginalization, exclusion and discrim- ination. The victorious group may seek to dominate the new security structures. \n A negotiated process: At the national level, this is the most common form of con- flict resolution and often results in a comprehensive peace agreement (CPA) that addresses the political aspects of a conflict and might include provisions for DDR (this is considered a prerequisite for a DDR programme). Negotiated processes can also lead to local-level peace agreements, which can be followed by DDR- related tools such as CVR and transitional weapons and ammunition management (WAM) or reintegration support. DDR processes that are the outcome of negotiations (whether local or national) are more likely to be acceptable to warring parties. However, unless expert advice is provided, the DDR-related clauses in such agree- ments can be unrealistic. \n Partial peace: In some conflicts the multiplicity of armed groups may result in peace processes that are not fully inclusive, since some of the armed groups are excluded from or refuse to sign the agreement. This can be a disincentive for signatory armed groups to disarm and demobilize due to fear for their security and that of the population they represent, concerns over loss of territory to a non- signatory armed group or uncertainty about how their political position might be affected should other armed groups eventually join the peace process.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -24978,14 +24978,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Contextual considerations ", "Heading3": "5.1.3 Conflict outcomes", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n A negotiated process: At the national level, this is the most common form of con- flict resolution and often results in a comprehensive peace agreement (CPA) that addresses the political aspects of a conflict and might include provisions for DDR (this is considered a prerequisite for a DDR programme).", + "Sentence": "\n A negotiated process: At the national level, this is the most common form of con- flict resolution and often results in a comprehensive peace agreement (CPA) that addresses the political aspects of a conflict and might include provisions for DDR (this is considered a prerequisite for a DDR programme).", "newParagraph": "way conflict end influence political dynamic ddr following scenario considered n clear victor usually result victor peace winner im pose demand party lost conflict may mean armed structure victor preserved losing party one tar geted ddr le emphasis may placed reintegration defeated combatant stigma excombatant person formerly associated armed force group including child associated armed force group caafg waafg compounded part defeated group resulting increased marginalization exclusion discrim ination victorious group may seek dominate new security structure n negotiated process national level common form con flict resolution often result comprehensive peace agreement cpa address political aspect conflict might include provision ddr considered prerequisite ddr programme negotiated process also lead locallevel peace agreement followed ddr related tool cvr transitional weapon ammunition management wam reintegration support ddr process outcome negotiation whether local national likely acceptable warring party however unless expert advice provided ddrrelated clause agree ments unrealistic n partial peace conflict multiplicity armed group may result peace process fully inclusive since armed group excluded refuse sign agreement disincentive signatory armed group disarm demobilize due fear security population represent concern loss territory non signatory armed group uncertainty political position might affected armed group eventually join peace process", "ProcessedSent": "n negotiated process national level common form con flict resolution often result comprehensive peace agreement cpa address political aspect conflict might include provision ddr considered prerequisite ddr programme", "SentID": 1387 }, { "ParagraphID": 497, - "Paragraph": "The way a conflict ends can influence the political dynamics of DDR. The following scenarios should be considered: \\n A clear victor: This usually results in a \u2018victor\u2019s peace\u2019, where the winner can \u2018im- pose\u2019 demands on the party that lost the conflict. This may mean that the armed structures of the victor are preserved, while the losing party will be the one tar- geted for DDR. Less emphasis may be placed on the reintegration of the defeated combatants, and the stigma of being an ex-combatant or person formerly associated with an armed force or group (including children associated with armed forces and groups [CAAFG] and WAAFG) is compounded by that of having been a part of a defeated group, resulting in increased marginalization, exclusion and discrim- ination. The victorious group may seek to dominate the new security structures. \\n A negotiated process: At the national level, this is the most common form of con- flict resolution and often results in a comprehensive peace agreement (CPA) that addresses the political aspects of a conflict and might include provisions for DDR (this is considered a prerequisite for a DDR programme). Negotiated processes can also lead to local-level peace agreements, which can be followed by DDR- related tools such as CVR and transitional weapons and ammunition management (WAM) or reintegration support. DDR processes that are the outcome of negotiations (whether local or national) are more likely to be acceptable to warring parties. However, unless expert advice is provided, the DDR-related clauses in such agree- ments can be unrealistic. \\n Partial peace: In some conflicts the multiplicity of armed groups may result in peace processes that are not fully inclusive, since some of the armed groups are excluded from or refuse to sign the agreement. This can be a disincentive for signatory armed groups to disarm and demobilize due to fear for their security and that of the population they represent, concerns over loss of territory to a non- signatory armed group or uncertainty about how their political position might be affected should other armed groups eventually join the peace process.", + "Paragraph": "The way a conflict ends can influence the political dynamics of DDR. The following scenarios should be considered: \n A clear victor: This usually results in a \u2018victor\u2019s peace\u2019, where the winner can \u2018im- pose\u2019 demands on the party that lost the conflict. This may mean that the armed structures of the victor are preserved, while the losing party will be the one tar- geted for DDR. Less emphasis may be placed on the reintegration of the defeated combatants, and the stigma of being an ex-combatant or person formerly associated with an armed force or group (including children associated with armed forces and groups [CAAFG] and WAAFG) is compounded by that of having been a part of a defeated group, resulting in increased marginalization, exclusion and discrim- ination. The victorious group may seek to dominate the new security structures. \n A negotiated process: At the national level, this is the most common form of con- flict resolution and often results in a comprehensive peace agreement (CPA) that addresses the political aspects of a conflict and might include provisions for DDR (this is considered a prerequisite for a DDR programme). Negotiated processes can also lead to local-level peace agreements, which can be followed by DDR- related tools such as CVR and transitional weapons and ammunition management (WAM) or reintegration support. DDR processes that are the outcome of negotiations (whether local or national) are more likely to be acceptable to warring parties. However, unless expert advice is provided, the DDR-related clauses in such agree- ments can be unrealistic. \n Partial peace: In some conflicts the multiplicity of armed groups may result in peace processes that are not fully inclusive, since some of the armed groups are excluded from or refuse to sign the agreement. This can be a disincentive for signatory armed groups to disarm and demobilize due to fear for their security and that of the population they represent, concerns over loss of territory to a non- signatory armed group or uncertainty about how their political position might be affected should other armed groups eventually join the peace process.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -25003,7 +25003,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 497, - "Paragraph": "The way a conflict ends can influence the political dynamics of DDR. The following scenarios should be considered: \\n A clear victor: This usually results in a \u2018victor\u2019s peace\u2019, where the winner can \u2018im- pose\u2019 demands on the party that lost the conflict. This may mean that the armed structures of the victor are preserved, while the losing party will be the one tar- geted for DDR. Less emphasis may be placed on the reintegration of the defeated combatants, and the stigma of being an ex-combatant or person formerly associated with an armed force or group (including children associated with armed forces and groups [CAAFG] and WAAFG) is compounded by that of having been a part of a defeated group, resulting in increased marginalization, exclusion and discrim- ination. The victorious group may seek to dominate the new security structures. \\n A negotiated process: At the national level, this is the most common form of con- flict resolution and often results in a comprehensive peace agreement (CPA) that addresses the political aspects of a conflict and might include provisions for DDR (this is considered a prerequisite for a DDR programme). Negotiated processes can also lead to local-level peace agreements, which can be followed by DDR- related tools such as CVR and transitional weapons and ammunition management (WAM) or reintegration support. DDR processes that are the outcome of negotiations (whether local or national) are more likely to be acceptable to warring parties. However, unless expert advice is provided, the DDR-related clauses in such agree- ments can be unrealistic. \\n Partial peace: In some conflicts the multiplicity of armed groups may result in peace processes that are not fully inclusive, since some of the armed groups are excluded from or refuse to sign the agreement. This can be a disincentive for signatory armed groups to disarm and demobilize due to fear for their security and that of the population they represent, concerns over loss of territory to a non- signatory armed group or uncertainty about how their political position might be affected should other armed groups eventually join the peace process.", + "Paragraph": "The way a conflict ends can influence the political dynamics of DDR. The following scenarios should be considered: \n A clear victor: This usually results in a \u2018victor\u2019s peace\u2019, where the winner can \u2018im- pose\u2019 demands on the party that lost the conflict. This may mean that the armed structures of the victor are preserved, while the losing party will be the one tar- geted for DDR. Less emphasis may be placed on the reintegration of the defeated combatants, and the stigma of being an ex-combatant or person formerly associated with an armed force or group (including children associated with armed forces and groups [CAAFG] and WAAFG) is compounded by that of having been a part of a defeated group, resulting in increased marginalization, exclusion and discrim- ination. The victorious group may seek to dominate the new security structures. \n A negotiated process: At the national level, this is the most common form of con- flict resolution and often results in a comprehensive peace agreement (CPA) that addresses the political aspects of a conflict and might include provisions for DDR (this is considered a prerequisite for a DDR programme). Negotiated processes can also lead to local-level peace agreements, which can be followed by DDR- related tools such as CVR and transitional weapons and ammunition management (WAM) or reintegration support. DDR processes that are the outcome of negotiations (whether local or national) are more likely to be acceptable to warring parties. However, unless expert advice is provided, the DDR-related clauses in such agree- ments can be unrealistic. \n Partial peace: In some conflicts the multiplicity of armed groups may result in peace processes that are not fully inclusive, since some of the armed groups are excluded from or refuse to sign the agreement. This can be a disincentive for signatory armed groups to disarm and demobilize due to fear for their security and that of the population they represent, concerns over loss of territory to a non- signatory armed group or uncertainty about how their political position might be affected should other armed groups eventually join the peace process.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -25021,7 +25021,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 497, - "Paragraph": "The way a conflict ends can influence the political dynamics of DDR. The following scenarios should be considered: \\n A clear victor: This usually results in a \u2018victor\u2019s peace\u2019, where the winner can \u2018im- pose\u2019 demands on the party that lost the conflict. This may mean that the armed structures of the victor are preserved, while the losing party will be the one tar- geted for DDR. Less emphasis may be placed on the reintegration of the defeated combatants, and the stigma of being an ex-combatant or person formerly associated with an armed force or group (including children associated with armed forces and groups [CAAFG] and WAAFG) is compounded by that of having been a part of a defeated group, resulting in increased marginalization, exclusion and discrim- ination. The victorious group may seek to dominate the new security structures. \\n A negotiated process: At the national level, this is the most common form of con- flict resolution and often results in a comprehensive peace agreement (CPA) that addresses the political aspects of a conflict and might include provisions for DDR (this is considered a prerequisite for a DDR programme). Negotiated processes can also lead to local-level peace agreements, which can be followed by DDR- related tools such as CVR and transitional weapons and ammunition management (WAM) or reintegration support. DDR processes that are the outcome of negotiations (whether local or national) are more likely to be acceptable to warring parties. However, unless expert advice is provided, the DDR-related clauses in such agree- ments can be unrealistic. \\n Partial peace: In some conflicts the multiplicity of armed groups may result in peace processes that are not fully inclusive, since some of the armed groups are excluded from or refuse to sign the agreement. This can be a disincentive for signatory armed groups to disarm and demobilize due to fear for their security and that of the population they represent, concerns over loss of territory to a non- signatory armed group or uncertainty about how their political position might be affected should other armed groups eventually join the peace process.", + "Paragraph": "The way a conflict ends can influence the political dynamics of DDR. The following scenarios should be considered: \n A clear victor: This usually results in a \u2018victor\u2019s peace\u2019, where the winner can \u2018im- pose\u2019 demands on the party that lost the conflict. This may mean that the armed structures of the victor are preserved, while the losing party will be the one tar- geted for DDR. Less emphasis may be placed on the reintegration of the defeated combatants, and the stigma of being an ex-combatant or person formerly associated with an armed force or group (including children associated with armed forces and groups [CAAFG] and WAAFG) is compounded by that of having been a part of a defeated group, resulting in increased marginalization, exclusion and discrim- ination. The victorious group may seek to dominate the new security structures. \n A negotiated process: At the national level, this is the most common form of con- flict resolution and often results in a comprehensive peace agreement (CPA) that addresses the political aspects of a conflict and might include provisions for DDR (this is considered a prerequisite for a DDR programme). Negotiated processes can also lead to local-level peace agreements, which can be followed by DDR- related tools such as CVR and transitional weapons and ammunition management (WAM) or reintegration support. DDR processes that are the outcome of negotiations (whether local or national) are more likely to be acceptable to warring parties. However, unless expert advice is provided, the DDR-related clauses in such agree- ments can be unrealistic. \n Partial peace: In some conflicts the multiplicity of armed groups may result in peace processes that are not fully inclusive, since some of the armed groups are excluded from or refuse to sign the agreement. This can be a disincentive for signatory armed groups to disarm and demobilize due to fear for their security and that of the population they represent, concerns over loss of territory to a non- signatory armed group or uncertainty about how their political position might be affected should other armed groups eventually join the peace process.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -25039,7 +25039,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 497, - "Paragraph": "The way a conflict ends can influence the political dynamics of DDR. The following scenarios should be considered: \\n A clear victor: This usually results in a \u2018victor\u2019s peace\u2019, where the winner can \u2018im- pose\u2019 demands on the party that lost the conflict. This may mean that the armed structures of the victor are preserved, while the losing party will be the one tar- geted for DDR. Less emphasis may be placed on the reintegration of the defeated combatants, and the stigma of being an ex-combatant or person formerly associated with an armed force or group (including children associated with armed forces and groups [CAAFG] and WAAFG) is compounded by that of having been a part of a defeated group, resulting in increased marginalization, exclusion and discrim- ination. The victorious group may seek to dominate the new security structures. \\n A negotiated process: At the national level, this is the most common form of con- flict resolution and often results in a comprehensive peace agreement (CPA) that addresses the political aspects of a conflict and might include provisions for DDR (this is considered a prerequisite for a DDR programme). Negotiated processes can also lead to local-level peace agreements, which can be followed by DDR- related tools such as CVR and transitional weapons and ammunition management (WAM) or reintegration support. DDR processes that are the outcome of negotiations (whether local or national) are more likely to be acceptable to warring parties. However, unless expert advice is provided, the DDR-related clauses in such agree- ments can be unrealistic. \\n Partial peace: In some conflicts the multiplicity of armed groups may result in peace processes that are not fully inclusive, since some of the armed groups are excluded from or refuse to sign the agreement. This can be a disincentive for signatory armed groups to disarm and demobilize due to fear for their security and that of the population they represent, concerns over loss of territory to a non- signatory armed group or uncertainty about how their political position might be affected should other armed groups eventually join the peace process.", + "Paragraph": "The way a conflict ends can influence the political dynamics of DDR. The following scenarios should be considered: \n A clear victor: This usually results in a \u2018victor\u2019s peace\u2019, where the winner can \u2018im- pose\u2019 demands on the party that lost the conflict. This may mean that the armed structures of the victor are preserved, while the losing party will be the one tar- geted for DDR. Less emphasis may be placed on the reintegration of the defeated combatants, and the stigma of being an ex-combatant or person formerly associated with an armed force or group (including children associated with armed forces and groups [CAAFG] and WAAFG) is compounded by that of having been a part of a defeated group, resulting in increased marginalization, exclusion and discrim- ination. The victorious group may seek to dominate the new security structures. \n A negotiated process: At the national level, this is the most common form of con- flict resolution and often results in a comprehensive peace agreement (CPA) that addresses the political aspects of a conflict and might include provisions for DDR (this is considered a prerequisite for a DDR programme). Negotiated processes can also lead to local-level peace agreements, which can be followed by DDR- related tools such as CVR and transitional weapons and ammunition management (WAM) or reintegration support. DDR processes that are the outcome of negotiations (whether local or national) are more likely to be acceptable to warring parties. However, unless expert advice is provided, the DDR-related clauses in such agree- ments can be unrealistic. \n Partial peace: In some conflicts the multiplicity of armed groups may result in peace processes that are not fully inclusive, since some of the armed groups are excluded from or refuse to sign the agreement. This can be a disincentive for signatory armed groups to disarm and demobilize due to fear for their security and that of the population they represent, concerns over loss of territory to a non- signatory armed group or uncertainty about how their political position might be affected should other armed groups eventually join the peace process.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -25050,14 +25050,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Contextual considerations ", "Heading3": "5.1.3 Conflict outcomes", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Partial peace: In some conflicts the multiplicity of armed groups may result in peace processes that are not fully inclusive, since some of the armed groups are excluded from or refuse to sign the agreement.", + "Sentence": "\n Partial peace: In some conflicts the multiplicity of armed groups may result in peace processes that are not fully inclusive, since some of the armed groups are excluded from or refuse to sign the agreement.", "newParagraph": "way conflict end influence political dynamic ddr following scenario considered n clear victor usually result victor peace winner im pose demand party lost conflict may mean armed structure victor preserved losing party one tar geted ddr le emphasis may placed reintegration defeated combatant stigma excombatant person formerly associated armed force group including child associated armed force group caafg waafg compounded part defeated group resulting increased marginalization exclusion discrim ination victorious group may seek dominate new security structure n negotiated process national level common form con flict resolution often result comprehensive peace agreement cpa address political aspect conflict might include provision ddr considered prerequisite ddr programme negotiated process also lead locallevel peace agreement followed ddr related tool cvr transitional weapon ammunition management wam reintegration support ddr process outcome negotiation whether local national likely acceptable warring party however unless expert advice provided ddrrelated clause agree ments unrealistic n partial peace conflict multiplicity armed group may result peace process fully inclusive since armed group excluded refuse sign agreement disincentive signatory armed group disarm demobilize due fear security population represent concern loss territory non signatory armed group uncertainty political position might affected armed group eventually join peace process", "ProcessedSent": "n partial peace conflict multiplicity armed group may result peace process fully inclusive since armed group excluded refuse sign agreement", "SentID": 1391 }, { "ParagraphID": 497, - "Paragraph": "The way a conflict ends can influence the political dynamics of DDR. The following scenarios should be considered: \\n A clear victor: This usually results in a \u2018victor\u2019s peace\u2019, where the winner can \u2018im- pose\u2019 demands on the party that lost the conflict. This may mean that the armed structures of the victor are preserved, while the losing party will be the one tar- geted for DDR. Less emphasis may be placed on the reintegration of the defeated combatants, and the stigma of being an ex-combatant or person formerly associated with an armed force or group (including children associated with armed forces and groups [CAAFG] and WAAFG) is compounded by that of having been a part of a defeated group, resulting in increased marginalization, exclusion and discrim- ination. The victorious group may seek to dominate the new security structures. \\n A negotiated process: At the national level, this is the most common form of con- flict resolution and often results in a comprehensive peace agreement (CPA) that addresses the political aspects of a conflict and might include provisions for DDR (this is considered a prerequisite for a DDR programme). Negotiated processes can also lead to local-level peace agreements, which can be followed by DDR- related tools such as CVR and transitional weapons and ammunition management (WAM) or reintegration support. DDR processes that are the outcome of negotiations (whether local or national) are more likely to be acceptable to warring parties. However, unless expert advice is provided, the DDR-related clauses in such agree- ments can be unrealistic. \\n Partial peace: In some conflicts the multiplicity of armed groups may result in peace processes that are not fully inclusive, since some of the armed groups are excluded from or refuse to sign the agreement. This can be a disincentive for signatory armed groups to disarm and demobilize due to fear for their security and that of the population they represent, concerns over loss of territory to a non- signatory armed group or uncertainty about how their political position might be affected should other armed groups eventually join the peace process.", + "Paragraph": "The way a conflict ends can influence the political dynamics of DDR. The following scenarios should be considered: \n A clear victor: This usually results in a \u2018victor\u2019s peace\u2019, where the winner can \u2018im- pose\u2019 demands on the party that lost the conflict. This may mean that the armed structures of the victor are preserved, while the losing party will be the one tar- geted for DDR. Less emphasis may be placed on the reintegration of the defeated combatants, and the stigma of being an ex-combatant or person formerly associated with an armed force or group (including children associated with armed forces and groups [CAAFG] and WAAFG) is compounded by that of having been a part of a defeated group, resulting in increased marginalization, exclusion and discrim- ination. The victorious group may seek to dominate the new security structures. \n A negotiated process: At the national level, this is the most common form of con- flict resolution and often results in a comprehensive peace agreement (CPA) that addresses the political aspects of a conflict and might include provisions for DDR (this is considered a prerequisite for a DDR programme). Negotiated processes can also lead to local-level peace agreements, which can be followed by DDR- related tools such as CVR and transitional weapons and ammunition management (WAM) or reintegration support. DDR processes that are the outcome of negotiations (whether local or national) are more likely to be acceptable to warring parties. However, unless expert advice is provided, the DDR-related clauses in such agree- ments can be unrealistic. \n Partial peace: In some conflicts the multiplicity of armed groups may result in peace processes that are not fully inclusive, since some of the armed groups are excluded from or refuse to sign the agreement. This can be a disincentive for signatory armed groups to disarm and demobilize due to fear for their security and that of the population they represent, concerns over loss of territory to a non- signatory armed group or uncertainty about how their political position might be affected should other armed groups eventually join the peace process.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -26623,7 +26623,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 526, - "Paragraph": "As illustrated in Diagram 1 below, CPAs usually include several chapters or annexes addressing different substantive issues. \\n The first three activities under \u201cCeasefire and Security Arrangements\u201d are typically part of the ceasefire process. The cantonment of forces, especially when cantonment sites are also used for DDR activities, is usually the nexus between the ceasefire and the \u201cfinal security arrangements\u201d that include DDR and SSR (see section 7.5).", + "Paragraph": "As illustrated in Diagram 1 below, CPAs usually include several chapters or annexes addressing different substantive issues. \n The first three activities under \u201cCeasefire and Security Arrangements\u201d are typically part of the ceasefire process. The cantonment of forces, especially when cantonment sites are also used for DDR activities, is usually the nexus between the ceasefire and the \u201cfinal security arrangements\u201d that include DDR and SSR (see section 7.5).", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -26641,7 +26641,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 526, - "Paragraph": "As illustrated in Diagram 1 below, CPAs usually include several chapters or annexes addressing different substantive issues. \\n The first three activities under \u201cCeasefire and Security Arrangements\u201d are typically part of the ceasefire process. The cantonment of forces, especially when cantonment sites are also used for DDR activities, is usually the nexus between the ceasefire and the \u201cfinal security arrangements\u201d that include DDR and SSR (see section 7.5).", + "Paragraph": "As illustrated in Diagram 1 below, CPAs usually include several chapters or annexes addressing different substantive issues. \n The first three activities under \u201cCeasefire and Security Arrangements\u201d are typically part of the ceasefire process. The cantonment of forces, especially when cantonment sites are also used for DDR activities, is usually the nexus between the ceasefire and the \u201cfinal security arrangements\u201d that include DDR and SSR (see section 7.5).", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -26652,14 +26652,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Preliminary ceasefires and comprehensive peace agreements ", "Heading3": "7.2.2 Comprehensive Peace Agreements", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The first three activities under \u201cCeasefire and Security Arrangements\u201d are typically part of the ceasefire process.", + "Sentence": "\n The first three activities under \u201cCeasefire and Security Arrangements\u201d are typically part of the ceasefire process.", "newParagraph": "illustrated diagram 1 cpa usually include several chapter annex addressing different substantive issue n first three activity ceasefire security arrangement typically part ceasefire process cantonment force especially cantonment site also used ddr activity usually nexus ceasefire final security arrangement include ddr ssr see section 75", "ProcessedSent": "n first three activity ceasefire security arrangement typically part ceasefire process", "SentID": 1480 }, { "ParagraphID": 526, - "Paragraph": "As illustrated in Diagram 1 below, CPAs usually include several chapters or annexes addressing different substantive issues. \\n The first three activities under \u201cCeasefire and Security Arrangements\u201d are typically part of the ceasefire process. The cantonment of forces, especially when cantonment sites are also used for DDR activities, is usually the nexus between the ceasefire and the \u201cfinal security arrangements\u201d that include DDR and SSR (see section 7.5).", + "Paragraph": "As illustrated in Diagram 1 below, CPAs usually include several chapters or annexes addressing different substantive issues. \n The first three activities under \u201cCeasefire and Security Arrangements\u201d are typically part of the ceasefire process. The cantonment of forces, especially when cantonment sites are also used for DDR activities, is usually the nexus between the ceasefire and the \u201cfinal security arrangements\u201d that include DDR and SSR (see section 7.5).", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -27271,7 +27271,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 537, - "Paragraph": "Security Council Resolution 1325 (2000) calls on all actors involved, when negotiating and implementing peace agreements, to adopt a gender perspective, including, inter alia: \\na.The special needs of women and girls during repatriation and resettlement and for rehabilitation, reintegration and post-conflict reconstruction; \\nb.Measures that support local women\u2019s peace initiatives and indigenous pro- cesses for conflict resolution, and that involve women in all of the implementa- tion mechanisms of the peace agreements; \\nc.Measures that ensure the protection of and respect for human rights of women and girls, particularly as they relate to the constitution, the electoral system, the police and the judiciary.", + "Paragraph": "Security Council Resolution 1325 (2000) calls on all actors involved, when negotiating and implementing peace agreements, to adopt a gender perspective, including, inter alia: \na.The special needs of women and girls during repatriation and resettlement and for rehabilitation, reintegration and post-conflict reconstruction; \nb.Measures that support local women\u2019s peace initiatives and indigenous pro- cesses for conflict resolution, and that involve women in all of the implementa- tion mechanisms of the peace agreements; \nc.Measures that ensure the protection of and respect for human rights of women and girls, particularly as they relate to the constitution, the electoral system, the police and the judiciary.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -27282,7 +27282,7 @@ "Heading2": "7.3 DDR support to mediation", "Heading3": "7.3.1 Peace mediation and gender", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Security Council Resolution 1325 (2000) calls on all actors involved, when negotiating and implementing peace agreements, to adopt a gender perspective, including, inter alia: \\na.The special needs of women and girls during repatriation and resettlement and for rehabilitation, reintegration and post-conflict reconstruction; \\nb.Measures that support local women\u2019s peace initiatives and indigenous pro- cesses for conflict resolution, and that involve women in all of the implementa- tion mechanisms of the peace agreements; \\nc.Measures that ensure the protection of and respect for human rights of women and girls, particularly as they relate to the constitution, the electoral system, the police and the judiciary.", + "Sentence": "Security Council Resolution 1325 (2000) calls on all actors involved, when negotiating and implementing peace agreements, to adopt a gender perspective, including, inter alia: \na.The special needs of women and girls during repatriation and resettlement and for rehabilitation, reintegration and post-conflict reconstruction; \nb.Measures that support local women\u2019s peace initiatives and indigenous pro- cesses for conflict resolution, and that involve women in all of the implementa- tion mechanisms of the peace agreements; \nc.Measures that ensure the protection of and respect for human rights of women and girls, particularly as they relate to the constitution, the electoral system, the police and the judiciary.", "newParagraph": "security council resolution 1325 2000 call actor involved negotiating implementing peace agreement adopt gender perspective including inter alia nathe special need woman girl repatriation resettlement rehabilitation reintegration postconflict reconstruction nbmeasures support local woman peace initiative indigenous pro ce conflict resolution involve woman implementa tion mechanism peace agreement ncmeasures ensure protection respect human right woman girl particularly relate constitution electoral system police judiciary", "ProcessedSent": "security council resolution 1325 2000 call actor involved negotiating implementing peace agreement adopt gender perspective including inter alia nathe special need woman girl repatriation resettlement rehabilitation reintegration postconflict reconstruction nbmeasures support local woman peace initiative indigenous pro ce conflict resolution involve woman implementa tion mechanism peace agreement ncmeasures ensure protection respect human right woman girl particularly relate constitution electoral system police judiciary", "SentID": 1515 @@ -27559,7 +27559,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 542, - "Paragraph": "Transitional security arrangements vary in scope depending on the context, levels of trust and what might be acceptable to the parties. Options that might be considered include: \\n Acceptable third-party actor(s) who are able to secure the process. \\n Joint units, patrols or operations involving the parties to a conflict, often alongside a third-party presence (see also IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammu- nition Management). \\n Local security actors such as community police who are acceptable to the commu- nities and to the actors, as they are considered neutral and not a force brought in from outside. \\n Deployment of national police. Depending on the situation, this may have to occur with prior consent for any operations within a zone or be done alongside a third-party actor.", + "Paragraph": "Transitional security arrangements vary in scope depending on the context, levels of trust and what might be acceptable to the parties. Options that might be considered include: \n Acceptable third-party actor(s) who are able to secure the process. \n Joint units, patrols or operations involving the parties to a conflict, often alongside a third-party presence (see also IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammu- nition Management). \n Local security actors such as community police who are acceptable to the commu- nities and to the actors, as they are considered neutral and not a force brought in from outside. \n Deployment of national police. Depending on the situation, this may have to occur with prior consent for any operations within a zone or be done alongside a third-party actor.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -27577,7 +27577,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 542, - "Paragraph": "Transitional security arrangements vary in scope depending on the context, levels of trust and what might be acceptable to the parties. Options that might be considered include: \\n Acceptable third-party actor(s) who are able to secure the process. \\n Joint units, patrols or operations involving the parties to a conflict, often alongside a third-party presence (see also IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammu- nition Management). \\n Local security actors such as community police who are acceptable to the commu- nities and to the actors, as they are considered neutral and not a force brought in from outside. \\n Deployment of national police. Depending on the situation, this may have to occur with prior consent for any operations within a zone or be done alongside a third-party actor.", + "Paragraph": "Transitional security arrangements vary in scope depending on the context, levels of trust and what might be acceptable to the parties. Options that might be considered include: \n Acceptable third-party actor(s) who are able to secure the process. \n Joint units, patrols or operations involving the parties to a conflict, often alongside a third-party presence (see also IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammu- nition Management). \n Local security actors such as community police who are acceptable to the commu- nities and to the actors, as they are considered neutral and not a force brought in from outside. \n Deployment of national police. Depending on the situation, this may have to occur with prior consent for any operations within a zone or be done alongside a third-party actor.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -27588,14 +27588,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.5 DDR and transitional and final security arrangements", "Heading3": "7.5.1 Transitional security", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Options that might be considered include: \\n Acceptable third-party actor(s) who are able to secure the process.", + "Sentence": "Options that might be considered include: \n Acceptable third-party actor(s) who are able to secure the process.", "newParagraph": "transitional security arrangement vary scope depending context level trust might acceptable party option might considered include n acceptable thirdparty actor able secure process n joint unit patrol operation involving party conflict often alongside thirdparty presence see also iddrs 411 transitional weapon ammu nition management n local security actor community police acceptable commu nities actor considered neutral force brought outside n deployment national police depending situation may occur prior consent operation within zone done alongside thirdparty actor", "ProcessedSent": "option might considered include n acceptable thirdparty actor able secure process", "SentID": 1532 }, { "ParagraphID": 542, - "Paragraph": "Transitional security arrangements vary in scope depending on the context, levels of trust and what might be acceptable to the parties. Options that might be considered include: \\n Acceptable third-party actor(s) who are able to secure the process. \\n Joint units, patrols or operations involving the parties to a conflict, often alongside a third-party presence (see also IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammu- nition Management). \\n Local security actors such as community police who are acceptable to the commu- nities and to the actors, as they are considered neutral and not a force brought in from outside. \\n Deployment of national police. Depending on the situation, this may have to occur with prior consent for any operations within a zone or be done alongside a third-party actor.", + "Paragraph": "Transitional security arrangements vary in scope depending on the context, levels of trust and what might be acceptable to the parties. Options that might be considered include: \n Acceptable third-party actor(s) who are able to secure the process. \n Joint units, patrols or operations involving the parties to a conflict, often alongside a third-party presence (see also IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammu- nition Management). \n Local security actors such as community police who are acceptable to the commu- nities and to the actors, as they are considered neutral and not a force brought in from outside. \n Deployment of national police. Depending on the situation, this may have to occur with prior consent for any operations within a zone or be done alongside a third-party actor.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -27606,14 +27606,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.5 DDR and transitional and final security arrangements", "Heading3": "7.5.1 Transitional security", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Joint units, patrols or operations involving the parties to a conflict, often alongside a third-party presence (see also IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammu- nition Management).", + "Sentence": "\n Joint units, patrols or operations involving the parties to a conflict, often alongside a third-party presence (see also IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammu- nition Management).", "newParagraph": "transitional security arrangement vary scope depending context level trust might acceptable party option might considered include n acceptable thirdparty actor able secure process n joint unit patrol operation involving party conflict often alongside thirdparty presence see also iddrs 411 transitional weapon ammu nition management n local security actor community police acceptable commu nities actor considered neutral force brought outside n deployment national police depending situation may occur prior consent operation within zone done alongside thirdparty actor", "ProcessedSent": "n joint unit patrol operation involving party conflict often alongside thirdparty presence see also iddrs 411 transitional weapon ammu nition management", "SentID": 1533 }, { "ParagraphID": 542, - "Paragraph": "Transitional security arrangements vary in scope depending on the context, levels of trust and what might be acceptable to the parties. Options that might be considered include: \\n Acceptable third-party actor(s) who are able to secure the process. \\n Joint units, patrols or operations involving the parties to a conflict, often alongside a third-party presence (see also IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammu- nition Management). \\n Local security actors such as community police who are acceptable to the commu- nities and to the actors, as they are considered neutral and not a force brought in from outside. \\n Deployment of national police. Depending on the situation, this may have to occur with prior consent for any operations within a zone or be done alongside a third-party actor.", + "Paragraph": "Transitional security arrangements vary in scope depending on the context, levels of trust and what might be acceptable to the parties. Options that might be considered include: \n Acceptable third-party actor(s) who are able to secure the process. \n Joint units, patrols or operations involving the parties to a conflict, often alongside a third-party presence (see also IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammu- nition Management). \n Local security actors such as community police who are acceptable to the commu- nities and to the actors, as they are considered neutral and not a force brought in from outside. \n Deployment of national police. Depending on the situation, this may have to occur with prior consent for any operations within a zone or be done alongside a third-party actor.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -27624,14 +27624,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.5 DDR and transitional and final security arrangements", "Heading3": "7.5.1 Transitional security", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Local security actors such as community police who are acceptable to the commu- nities and to the actors, as they are considered neutral and not a force brought in from outside.", + "Sentence": "\n Local security actors such as community police who are acceptable to the commu- nities and to the actors, as they are considered neutral and not a force brought in from outside.", "newParagraph": "transitional security arrangement vary scope depending context level trust might acceptable party option might considered include n acceptable thirdparty actor able secure process n joint unit patrol operation involving party conflict often alongside thirdparty presence see also iddrs 411 transitional weapon ammu nition management n local security actor community police acceptable commu nities actor considered neutral force brought outside n deployment national police depending situation may occur prior consent operation within zone done alongside thirdparty actor", "ProcessedSent": "n local security actor community police acceptable commu nities actor considered neutral force brought outside", "SentID": 1534 }, { "ParagraphID": 542, - "Paragraph": "Transitional security arrangements vary in scope depending on the context, levels of trust and what might be acceptable to the parties. Options that might be considered include: \\n Acceptable third-party actor(s) who are able to secure the process. \\n Joint units, patrols or operations involving the parties to a conflict, often alongside a third-party presence (see also IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammu- nition Management). \\n Local security actors such as community police who are acceptable to the commu- nities and to the actors, as they are considered neutral and not a force brought in from outside. \\n Deployment of national police. Depending on the situation, this may have to occur with prior consent for any operations within a zone or be done alongside a third-party actor.", + "Paragraph": "Transitional security arrangements vary in scope depending on the context, levels of trust and what might be acceptable to the parties. Options that might be considered include: \n Acceptable third-party actor(s) who are able to secure the process. \n Joint units, patrols or operations involving the parties to a conflict, often alongside a third-party presence (see also IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammu- nition Management). \n Local security actors such as community police who are acceptable to the commu- nities and to the actors, as they are considered neutral and not a force brought in from outside. \n Deployment of national police. Depending on the situation, this may have to occur with prior consent for any operations within a zone or be done alongside a third-party actor.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -27642,14 +27642,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.5 DDR and transitional and final security arrangements", "Heading3": "7.5.1 Transitional security", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Deployment of national police.", + "Sentence": "\n Deployment of national police.", "newParagraph": "transitional security arrangement vary scope depending context level trust might acceptable party option might considered include n acceptable thirdparty actor able secure process n joint unit patrol operation involving party conflict often alongside thirdparty presence see also iddrs 411 transitional weapon ammu nition management n local security actor community police acceptable commu nities actor considered neutral force brought outside n deployment national police depending situation may occur prior consent operation within zone done alongside thirdparty actor", "ProcessedSent": "n deployment national police", "SentID": 1535 }, { "ParagraphID": 542, - "Paragraph": "Transitional security arrangements vary in scope depending on the context, levels of trust and what might be acceptable to the parties. Options that might be considered include: \\n Acceptable third-party actor(s) who are able to secure the process. \\n Joint units, patrols or operations involving the parties to a conflict, often alongside a third-party presence (see also IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammu- nition Management). \\n Local security actors such as community police who are acceptable to the commu- nities and to the actors, as they are considered neutral and not a force brought in from outside. \\n Deployment of national police. Depending on the situation, this may have to occur with prior consent for any operations within a zone or be done alongside a third-party actor.", + "Paragraph": "Transitional security arrangements vary in scope depending on the context, levels of trust and what might be acceptable to the parties. Options that might be considered include: \n Acceptable third-party actor(s) who are able to secure the process. \n Joint units, patrols or operations involving the parties to a conflict, often alongside a third-party presence (see also IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammu- nition Management). \n Local security actors such as community police who are acceptable to the commu- nities and to the actors, as they are considered neutral and not a force brought in from outside. \n Deployment of national police. Depending on the situation, this may have to occur with prior consent for any operations within a zone or be done alongside a third-party actor.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -28135,7 +28135,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 550, - "Paragraph": "The handover of weapons from one party to another (e.g., from an armed group to a Government) may be inappropriate, as it could be viewed as one side surrendering to the other (see also IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). To address this issue, DDR practitioners can consider: \\n The handover of weapons to a neutral third party. \\n The design of disarmament sites, as well as who is present there. The design should seek to minimize negative perceptions linked to the handover of weapons. This may also mean that the sites are under the control of a neutral party.", + "Paragraph": "The handover of weapons from one party to another (e.g., from an armed group to a Government) may be inappropriate, as it could be viewed as one side surrendering to the other (see also IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). To address this issue, DDR practitioners can consider: \n The handover of weapons to a neutral third party. \n The design of disarmament sites, as well as who is present there. The design should seek to minimize negative perceptions linked to the handover of weapons. This may also mean that the sites are under the control of a neutral party.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -28153,7 +28153,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 550, - "Paragraph": "The handover of weapons from one party to another (e.g., from an armed group to a Government) may be inappropriate, as it could be viewed as one side surrendering to the other (see also IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). To address this issue, DDR practitioners can consider: \\n The handover of weapons to a neutral third party. \\n The design of disarmament sites, as well as who is present there. The design should seek to minimize negative perceptions linked to the handover of weapons. This may also mean that the sites are under the control of a neutral party.", + "Paragraph": "The handover of weapons from one party to another (e.g., from an armed group to a Government) may be inappropriate, as it could be viewed as one side surrendering to the other (see also IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). To address this issue, DDR practitioners can consider: \n The handover of weapons to a neutral third party. \n The design of disarmament sites, as well as who is present there. The design should seek to minimize negative perceptions linked to the handover of weapons. This may also mean that the sites are under the control of a neutral party.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -28164,14 +28164,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.3 DDR programmes", "Heading3": "8.3.1 Political optics", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "To address this issue, DDR practitioners can consider: \\n The handover of weapons to a neutral third party.", + "Sentence": "To address this issue, DDR practitioners can consider: \n The handover of weapons to a neutral third party.", "newParagraph": "handover weapon one party another eg armed group government may inappropriate could viewed one side surrendering see also iddrs 410 disarmament address issue ddr practitioner consider n handover weapon neutral third party n design disarmament site well present design seek minimize negative perception linked handover weapon may also mean site control neutral party", "ProcessedSent": "address issue ddr practitioner consider n handover weapon neutral third party", "SentID": 1564 }, { "ParagraphID": 550, - "Paragraph": "The handover of weapons from one party to another (e.g., from an armed group to a Government) may be inappropriate, as it could be viewed as one side surrendering to the other (see also IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). To address this issue, DDR practitioners can consider: \\n The handover of weapons to a neutral third party. \\n The design of disarmament sites, as well as who is present there. The design should seek to minimize negative perceptions linked to the handover of weapons. This may also mean that the sites are under the control of a neutral party.", + "Paragraph": "The handover of weapons from one party to another (e.g., from an armed group to a Government) may be inappropriate, as it could be viewed as one side surrendering to the other (see also IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). To address this issue, DDR practitioners can consider: \n The handover of weapons to a neutral third party. \n The design of disarmament sites, as well as who is present there. The design should seek to minimize negative perceptions linked to the handover of weapons. This may also mean that the sites are under the control of a neutral party.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -28182,14 +28182,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.3 DDR programmes", "Heading3": "8.3.1 Political optics", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The design of disarmament sites, as well as who is present there.", + "Sentence": "\n The design of disarmament sites, as well as who is present there.", "newParagraph": "handover weapon one party another eg armed group government may inappropriate could viewed one side surrendering see also iddrs 410 disarmament address issue ddr practitioner consider n handover weapon neutral third party n design disarmament site well present design seek minimize negative perception linked handover weapon may also mean site control neutral party", "ProcessedSent": "n design disarmament site well present", "SentID": 1565 }, { "ParagraphID": 550, - "Paragraph": "The handover of weapons from one party to another (e.g., from an armed group to a Government) may be inappropriate, as it could be viewed as one side surrendering to the other (see also IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). To address this issue, DDR practitioners can consider: \\n The handover of weapons to a neutral third party. \\n The design of disarmament sites, as well as who is present there. The design should seek to minimize negative perceptions linked to the handover of weapons. This may also mean that the sites are under the control of a neutral party.", + "Paragraph": "The handover of weapons from one party to another (e.g., from an armed group to a Government) may be inappropriate, as it could be viewed as one side surrendering to the other (see also IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). To address this issue, DDR practitioners can consider: \n The handover of weapons to a neutral third party. \n The design of disarmament sites, as well as who is present there. The design should seek to minimize negative perceptions linked to the handover of weapons. This may also mean that the sites are under the control of a neutral party.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -28207,7 +28207,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 550, - "Paragraph": "The handover of weapons from one party to another (e.g., from an armed group to a Government) may be inappropriate, as it could be viewed as one side surrendering to the other (see also IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). To address this issue, DDR practitioners can consider: \\n The handover of weapons to a neutral third party. \\n The design of disarmament sites, as well as who is present there. The design should seek to minimize negative perceptions linked to the handover of weapons. This may also mean that the sites are under the control of a neutral party.", + "Paragraph": "The handover of weapons from one party to another (e.g., from an armed group to a Government) may be inappropriate, as it could be viewed as one side surrendering to the other (see also IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). To address this issue, DDR practitioners can consider: \n The handover of weapons to a neutral third party. \n The design of disarmament sites, as well as who is present there. The design should seek to minimize negative perceptions linked to the handover of weapons. This may also mean that the sites are under the control of a neutral party.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -28405,7 +28405,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 554, - "Paragraph": "Opposition armed groups may be reluctant to demobilize their troops and dismantle their command structures before receiving tangible indications that the political aspects of an agreement will be implemented. This can take time, and there may be a need to consider measures to keep troops under command and control, fed and paid in the interim. They could include: \\n Extended cantonment (this should not be open ended, and a reasonable end date should be set, even if it needs to be renegotiated later); \\n Linking demobilization to the successful completion of benchmarks in the political arena and in the transformation of armed groups into political parties; \\n Pre-DDR activities; \\n Providing other opportunities such as work brigades that keep the command and control of the groups but reorientate them towards more constructive activities.", + "Paragraph": "Opposition armed groups may be reluctant to demobilize their troops and dismantle their command structures before receiving tangible indications that the political aspects of an agreement will be implemented. This can take time, and there may be a need to consider measures to keep troops under command and control, fed and paid in the interim. They could include: \n Extended cantonment (this should not be open ended, and a reasonable end date should be set, even if it needs to be renegotiated later); \n Linking demobilization to the successful completion of benchmarks in the political arena and in the transformation of armed groups into political parties; \n Pre-DDR activities; \n Providing other opportunities such as work brigades that keep the command and control of the groups but reorientate them towards more constructive activities.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -28423,7 +28423,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 554, - "Paragraph": "Opposition armed groups may be reluctant to demobilize their troops and dismantle their command structures before receiving tangible indications that the political aspects of an agreement will be implemented. This can take time, and there may be a need to consider measures to keep troops under command and control, fed and paid in the interim. They could include: \\n Extended cantonment (this should not be open ended, and a reasonable end date should be set, even if it needs to be renegotiated later); \\n Linking demobilization to the successful completion of benchmarks in the political arena and in the transformation of armed groups into political parties; \\n Pre-DDR activities; \\n Providing other opportunities such as work brigades that keep the command and control of the groups but reorientate them towards more constructive activities.", + "Paragraph": "Opposition armed groups may be reluctant to demobilize their troops and dismantle their command structures before receiving tangible indications that the political aspects of an agreement will be implemented. This can take time, and there may be a need to consider measures to keep troops under command and control, fed and paid in the interim. They could include: \n Extended cantonment (this should not be open ended, and a reasonable end date should be set, even if it needs to be renegotiated later); \n Linking demobilization to the successful completion of benchmarks in the political arena and in the transformation of armed groups into political parties; \n Pre-DDR activities; \n Providing other opportunities such as work brigades that keep the command and control of the groups but reorientate them towards more constructive activities.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -28441,7 +28441,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 554, - "Paragraph": "Opposition armed groups may be reluctant to demobilize their troops and dismantle their command structures before receiving tangible indications that the political aspects of an agreement will be implemented. This can take time, and there may be a need to consider measures to keep troops under command and control, fed and paid in the interim. They could include: \\n Extended cantonment (this should not be open ended, and a reasonable end date should be set, even if it needs to be renegotiated later); \\n Linking demobilization to the successful completion of benchmarks in the political arena and in the transformation of armed groups into political parties; \\n Pre-DDR activities; \\n Providing other opportunities such as work brigades that keep the command and control of the groups but reorientate them towards more constructive activities.", + "Paragraph": "Opposition armed groups may be reluctant to demobilize their troops and dismantle their command structures before receiving tangible indications that the political aspects of an agreement will be implemented. This can take time, and there may be a need to consider measures to keep troops under command and control, fed and paid in the interim. They could include: \n Extended cantonment (this should not be open ended, and a reasonable end date should be set, even if it needs to be renegotiated later); \n Linking demobilization to the successful completion of benchmarks in the political arena and in the transformation of armed groups into political parties; \n Pre-DDR activities; \n Providing other opportunities such as work brigades that keep the command and control of the groups but reorientate them towards more constructive activities.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -28452,7 +28452,7 @@ "Heading2": "8.3 DDR programmes", "Heading3": "8.3.3 Linkages to other aspects of the peace process", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "They could include: \\n Extended cantonment (this should not be open ended, and a reasonable end date should be set, even if it needs to be renegotiated later); \\n Linking demobilization to the successful completion of benchmarks in the political arena and in the transformation of armed groups into political parties; \\n Pre-DDR activities; \\n Providing other opportunities such as work brigades that keep the command and control of the groups but reorientate them towards more constructive activities.", + "Sentence": "They could include: \n Extended cantonment (this should not be open ended, and a reasonable end date should be set, even if it needs to be renegotiated later); \n Linking demobilization to the successful completion of benchmarks in the political arena and in the transformation of armed groups into political parties; \n Pre-DDR activities; \n Providing other opportunities such as work brigades that keep the command and control of the groups but reorientate them towards more constructive activities.", "newParagraph": "opposition armed group may reluctant demobilize troop dismantle command structure receiving tangible indication political aspect agreement implemented take time may need consider measure keep troop command control fed paid interim could include n extended cantonment open ended reasonable end date set even need renegotiated later n linking demobilization successful completion benchmark political arena transformation armed group political party n preddr activity n providing opportunity work brigade keep command control group reorientate towards constructive activity", "ProcessedSent": "could include n extended cantonment open ended reasonable end date set even need renegotiated later n linking demobilization successful completion benchmark political arena transformation armed group political party n preddr activity n providing opportunity work brigade keep command control group reorientate towards constructive activity", "SentID": 1580 @@ -28783,7 +28783,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 559, - "Paragraph": "DDR may affect the holding of or influence the outcome of elections in several ways: \\n Armed forces and groups that wield power through weapons and the threat of violence can influence the way people vote, affecting the free and fair nature of the elections. \\n Hybrid political \u2019parties\u2019 that are armed and able to organize violence retain the ability to challenge electoral results through force. \\n Armed groups may not have had the time nor space to transform into political actors. They may feel cheated if they are not able to participate fully in the process and revert to violence, as this is their usual way of challenging institutions or articulating grievances. \\n Women in armed groups may be excluded or marginalized as leadership roles and places in the political ranks are carved out.", + "Paragraph": "DDR may affect the holding of or influence the outcome of elections in several ways: \n Armed forces and groups that wield power through weapons and the threat of violence can influence the way people vote, affecting the free and fair nature of the elections. \n Hybrid political \u2019parties\u2019 that are armed and able to organize violence retain the ability to challenge electoral results through force. \n Armed groups may not have had the time nor space to transform into political actors. They may feel cheated if they are not able to participate fully in the process and revert to violence, as this is their usual way of challenging institutions or articulating grievances. \n Women in armed groups may be excluded or marginalized as leadership roles and places in the political ranks are carved out.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -28794,14 +28794,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.3 DDR programmes", "Heading3": "8.3.4 Elections and the transformation of armed groups", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "DDR may affect the holding of or influence the outcome of elections in several ways: \\n Armed forces and groups that wield power through weapons and the threat of violence can influence the way people vote, affecting the free and fair nature of the elections.", + "Sentence": "DDR may affect the holding of or influence the outcome of elections in several ways: \n Armed forces and groups that wield power through weapons and the threat of violence can influence the way people vote, affecting the free and fair nature of the elections.", "newParagraph": "ddr may affect holding influence outcome election several way n armed force group wield power weapon threat violence influence way people vote affecting free fair nature election n hybrid political party armed able organize violence retain ability challenge electoral result force n armed group may time space transform political actor may feel cheated able participate fully process revert violence usual way challenging institution articulating grievance n woman armed group may excluded marginalized leadership role place political rank carved", "ProcessedSent": "ddr may affect holding influence outcome election several way n armed force group wield power weapon threat violence influence way people vote affecting free fair nature election", "SentID": 1599 }, { "ParagraphID": 559, - "Paragraph": "DDR may affect the holding of or influence the outcome of elections in several ways: \\n Armed forces and groups that wield power through weapons and the threat of violence can influence the way people vote, affecting the free and fair nature of the elections. \\n Hybrid political \u2019parties\u2019 that are armed and able to organize violence retain the ability to challenge electoral results through force. \\n Armed groups may not have had the time nor space to transform into political actors. They may feel cheated if they are not able to participate fully in the process and revert to violence, as this is their usual way of challenging institutions or articulating grievances. \\n Women in armed groups may be excluded or marginalized as leadership roles and places in the political ranks are carved out.", + "Paragraph": "DDR may affect the holding of or influence the outcome of elections in several ways: \n Armed forces and groups that wield power through weapons and the threat of violence can influence the way people vote, affecting the free and fair nature of the elections. \n Hybrid political \u2019parties\u2019 that are armed and able to organize violence retain the ability to challenge electoral results through force. \n Armed groups may not have had the time nor space to transform into political actors. They may feel cheated if they are not able to participate fully in the process and revert to violence, as this is their usual way of challenging institutions or articulating grievances. \n Women in armed groups may be excluded or marginalized as leadership roles and places in the political ranks are carved out.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -28812,14 +28812,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.3 DDR programmes", "Heading3": "8.3.4 Elections and the transformation of armed groups", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Hybrid political \u2019parties\u2019 that are armed and able to organize violence retain the ability to challenge electoral results through force.", + "Sentence": "\n Hybrid political \u2019parties\u2019 that are armed and able to organize violence retain the ability to challenge electoral results through force.", "newParagraph": "ddr may affect holding influence outcome election several way n armed force group wield power weapon threat violence influence way people vote affecting free fair nature election n hybrid political party armed able organize violence retain ability challenge electoral result force n armed group may time space transform political actor may feel cheated able participate fully process revert violence usual way challenging institution articulating grievance n woman armed group may excluded marginalized leadership role place political rank carved", "ProcessedSent": "n hybrid political party armed able organize violence retain ability challenge electoral result force", "SentID": 1600 }, { "ParagraphID": 559, - "Paragraph": "DDR may affect the holding of or influence the outcome of elections in several ways: \\n Armed forces and groups that wield power through weapons and the threat of violence can influence the way people vote, affecting the free and fair nature of the elections. \\n Hybrid political \u2019parties\u2019 that are armed and able to organize violence retain the ability to challenge electoral results through force. \\n Armed groups may not have had the time nor space to transform into political actors. They may feel cheated if they are not able to participate fully in the process and revert to violence, as this is their usual way of challenging institutions or articulating grievances. \\n Women in armed groups may be excluded or marginalized as leadership roles and places in the political ranks are carved out.", + "Paragraph": "DDR may affect the holding of or influence the outcome of elections in several ways: \n Armed forces and groups that wield power through weapons and the threat of violence can influence the way people vote, affecting the free and fair nature of the elections. \n Hybrid political \u2019parties\u2019 that are armed and able to organize violence retain the ability to challenge electoral results through force. \n Armed groups may not have had the time nor space to transform into political actors. They may feel cheated if they are not able to participate fully in the process and revert to violence, as this is their usual way of challenging institutions or articulating grievances. \n Women in armed groups may be excluded or marginalized as leadership roles and places in the political ranks are carved out.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -28830,14 +28830,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.3 DDR programmes", "Heading3": "8.3.4 Elections and the transformation of armed groups", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Armed groups may not have had the time nor space to transform into political actors.", + "Sentence": "\n Armed groups may not have had the time nor space to transform into political actors.", "newParagraph": "ddr may affect holding influence outcome election several way n armed force group wield power weapon threat violence influence way people vote affecting free fair nature election n hybrid political party armed able organize violence retain ability challenge electoral result force n armed group may time space transform political actor may feel cheated able participate fully process revert violence usual way challenging institution articulating grievance n woman armed group may excluded marginalized leadership role place political rank carved", "ProcessedSent": "n armed group may time space transform political actor", "SentID": 1601 }, { "ParagraphID": 559, - "Paragraph": "DDR may affect the holding of or influence the outcome of elections in several ways: \\n Armed forces and groups that wield power through weapons and the threat of violence can influence the way people vote, affecting the free and fair nature of the elections. \\n Hybrid political \u2019parties\u2019 that are armed and able to organize violence retain the ability to challenge electoral results through force. \\n Armed groups may not have had the time nor space to transform into political actors. They may feel cheated if they are not able to participate fully in the process and revert to violence, as this is their usual way of challenging institutions or articulating grievances. \\n Women in armed groups may be excluded or marginalized as leadership roles and places in the political ranks are carved out.", + "Paragraph": "DDR may affect the holding of or influence the outcome of elections in several ways: \n Armed forces and groups that wield power through weapons and the threat of violence can influence the way people vote, affecting the free and fair nature of the elections. \n Hybrid political \u2019parties\u2019 that are armed and able to organize violence retain the ability to challenge electoral results through force. \n Armed groups may not have had the time nor space to transform into political actors. They may feel cheated if they are not able to participate fully in the process and revert to violence, as this is their usual way of challenging institutions or articulating grievances. \n Women in armed groups may be excluded or marginalized as leadership roles and places in the political ranks are carved out.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -28855,7 +28855,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 559, - "Paragraph": "DDR may affect the holding of or influence the outcome of elections in several ways: \\n Armed forces and groups that wield power through weapons and the threat of violence can influence the way people vote, affecting the free and fair nature of the elections. \\n Hybrid political \u2019parties\u2019 that are armed and able to organize violence retain the ability to challenge electoral results through force. \\n Armed groups may not have had the time nor space to transform into political actors. They may feel cheated if they are not able to participate fully in the process and revert to violence, as this is their usual way of challenging institutions or articulating grievances. \\n Women in armed groups may be excluded or marginalized as leadership roles and places in the political ranks are carved out.", + "Paragraph": "DDR may affect the holding of or influence the outcome of elections in several ways: \n Armed forces and groups that wield power through weapons and the threat of violence can influence the way people vote, affecting the free and fair nature of the elections. \n Hybrid political \u2019parties\u2019 that are armed and able to organize violence retain the ability to challenge electoral results through force. \n Armed groups may not have had the time nor space to transform into political actors. They may feel cheated if they are not able to participate fully in the process and revert to violence, as this is their usual way of challenging institutions or articulating grievances. \n Women in armed groups may be excluded or marginalized as leadership roles and places in the political ranks are carved out.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -28866,7 +28866,7 @@ "Heading2": "8.3 DDR programmes", "Heading3": "8.3.4 Elections and the transformation of armed groups", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Women in armed groups may be excluded or marginalized as leadership roles and places in the political ranks are carved out.", + "Sentence": "\n Women in armed groups may be excluded or marginalized as leadership roles and places in the political ranks are carved out.", "newParagraph": "ddr may affect holding influence outcome election several way n armed force group wield power weapon threat violence influence way people vote affecting free fair nature election n hybrid political party armed able organize violence retain ability challenge electoral result force n armed group may time space transform political actor may feel cheated able participate fully process revert violence usual way challenging institution articulating grievance n woman armed group may excluded marginalized leadership role place political rank carved", "ProcessedSent": "n woman armed group may excluded marginalized leadership role place political rank carved", "SentID": 1603 @@ -29431,7 +29431,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 569, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardiza- tion (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \\n \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardiza- tion (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \n \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -29449,7 +29449,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 569, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardiza- tion (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \\n \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardiza- tion (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \n \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -29460,14 +29460,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardiza- tion (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \\n \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardiza- tion (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \n \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may must used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardiza tion iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n used indicate preferred requirement method specification n may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n must used indicate external constraint obligation", "ProcessedSent": "use consistent language used international organization standardiza tion iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n used indicate preferred requirement method specification n may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n must used indicate external constraint obligation", "SentID": 1636 }, { "ParagraphID": 570, - "Paragraph": "CVR programmes may include different types of coordination mechanisms to guide CVR project selection, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation. Two common coordination mechanisms are: \\n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsible for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC. (See below.) All project selec- tion should comply with gender quotas of a minimum of 30% of projects benefitting women, and women\u2019s involvement in 30% of leadership and management positions. \\n Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the overall strategic direction for CVR, vets and approves projects selected by PSCs, and helps to raise finances. The PAC\/PRC should exhibit a high degree of clarity on its roles and functions. Such entities meet on a semi-regular basis, usually after a certain number of CVR projects have been presented (a minimum of a week in advance) to PAC\/PRC members for consideration. The PAC\/PRC should ensure all proposals comply with gender quotas.", + "Paragraph": "CVR programmes may include different types of coordination mechanisms to guide CVR project selection, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation. Two common coordination mechanisms are: \n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsible for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC. (See below.) All project selec- tion should comply with gender quotas of a minimum of 30% of projects benefitting women, and women\u2019s involvement in 30% of leadership and management positions. \n Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the overall strategic direction for CVR, vets and approves projects selected by PSCs, and helps to raise finances. The PAC\/PRC should exhibit a high degree of clarity on its roles and functions. Such entities meet on a semi-regular basis, usually after a certain number of CVR projects have been presented (a minimum of a week in advance) to PAC\/PRC members for consideration. The PAC\/PRC should ensure all proposals comply with gender quotas.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -29485,7 +29485,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 570, - "Paragraph": "CVR programmes may include different types of coordination mechanisms to guide CVR project selection, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation. Two common coordination mechanisms are: \\n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsible for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC. (See below.) All project selec- tion should comply with gender quotas of a minimum of 30% of projects benefitting women, and women\u2019s involvement in 30% of leadership and management positions. \\n Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the overall strategic direction for CVR, vets and approves projects selected by PSCs, and helps to raise finances. The PAC\/PRC should exhibit a high degree of clarity on its roles and functions. Such entities meet on a semi-regular basis, usually after a certain number of CVR projects have been presented (a minimum of a week in advance) to PAC\/PRC members for consideration. The PAC\/PRC should ensure all proposals comply with gender quotas.", + "Paragraph": "CVR programmes may include different types of coordination mechanisms to guide CVR project selection, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation. Two common coordination mechanisms are: \n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsible for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC. (See below.) All project selec- tion should comply with gender quotas of a minimum of 30% of projects benefitting women, and women\u2019s involvement in 30% of leadership and management positions. \n Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the overall strategic direction for CVR, vets and approves projects selected by PSCs, and helps to raise finances. The PAC\/PRC should exhibit a high degree of clarity on its roles and functions. Such entities meet on a semi-regular basis, usually after a certain number of CVR projects have been presented (a minimum of a week in advance) to PAC\/PRC members for consideration. The PAC\/PRC should ensure all proposals comply with gender quotas.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -29496,14 +29496,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Two common coordination mechanisms are: \\n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsible for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC.", + "Sentence": "Two common coordination mechanisms are: \n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsible for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC.", "newParagraph": "cvr programme may include different type coordination mechanism guide cvr project selection implementation monitoring evaluation two common coordination mechanism n project selection committee pscs communitybased pscs established selected area include representative sample stakeholder responsible selecting project vetted pacprc see project selec tion comply gender quota minimum 30 project benefitting woman woman involvement 30 leadership management position n project approvalreview committee pacprc pacprc set overall strategic direction cvr vet approves project selected pscs help raise finance pacprc exhibit high degree clarity role function entity meet semiregular basis usually certain number cvr project presented minimum week advance pacprc member consideration pacprc ensure proposal comply gender quota", "ProcessedSent": "two common coordination mechanism n project selection committee pscs communitybased pscs established selected area include representative sample stakeholder responsible selecting project vetted pacprc", "SentID": 1638 }, { "ParagraphID": 570, - "Paragraph": "CVR programmes may include different types of coordination mechanisms to guide CVR project selection, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation. Two common coordination mechanisms are: \\n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsible for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC. (See below.) All project selec- tion should comply with gender quotas of a minimum of 30% of projects benefitting women, and women\u2019s involvement in 30% of leadership and management positions. \\n Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the overall strategic direction for CVR, vets and approves projects selected by PSCs, and helps to raise finances. The PAC\/PRC should exhibit a high degree of clarity on its roles and functions. Such entities meet on a semi-regular basis, usually after a certain number of CVR projects have been presented (a minimum of a week in advance) to PAC\/PRC members for consideration. The PAC\/PRC should ensure all proposals comply with gender quotas.", + "Paragraph": "CVR programmes may include different types of coordination mechanisms to guide CVR project selection, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation. Two common coordination mechanisms are: \n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsible for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC. (See below.) All project selec- tion should comply with gender quotas of a minimum of 30% of projects benefitting women, and women\u2019s involvement in 30% of leadership and management positions. \n Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the overall strategic direction for CVR, vets and approves projects selected by PSCs, and helps to raise finances. The PAC\/PRC should exhibit a high degree of clarity on its roles and functions. Such entities meet on a semi-regular basis, usually after a certain number of CVR projects have been presented (a minimum of a week in advance) to PAC\/PRC members for consideration. The PAC\/PRC should ensure all proposals comply with gender quotas.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -29521,7 +29521,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 570, - "Paragraph": "CVR programmes may include different types of coordination mechanisms to guide CVR project selection, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation. Two common coordination mechanisms are: \\n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsible for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC. (See below.) All project selec- tion should comply with gender quotas of a minimum of 30% of projects benefitting women, and women\u2019s involvement in 30% of leadership and management positions. \\n Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the overall strategic direction for CVR, vets and approves projects selected by PSCs, and helps to raise finances. The PAC\/PRC should exhibit a high degree of clarity on its roles and functions. Such entities meet on a semi-regular basis, usually after a certain number of CVR projects have been presented (a minimum of a week in advance) to PAC\/PRC members for consideration. The PAC\/PRC should ensure all proposals comply with gender quotas.", + "Paragraph": "CVR programmes may include different types of coordination mechanisms to guide CVR project selection, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation. Two common coordination mechanisms are: \n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsible for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC. (See below.) All project selec- tion should comply with gender quotas of a minimum of 30% of projects benefitting women, and women\u2019s involvement in 30% of leadership and management positions. \n Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the overall strategic direction for CVR, vets and approves projects selected by PSCs, and helps to raise finances. The PAC\/PRC should exhibit a high degree of clarity on its roles and functions. Such entities meet on a semi-regular basis, usually after a certain number of CVR projects have been presented (a minimum of a week in advance) to PAC\/PRC members for consideration. The PAC\/PRC should ensure all proposals comply with gender quotas.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -29539,7 +29539,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 570, - "Paragraph": "CVR programmes may include different types of coordination mechanisms to guide CVR project selection, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation. Two common coordination mechanisms are: \\n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsible for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC. (See below.) All project selec- tion should comply with gender quotas of a minimum of 30% of projects benefitting women, and women\u2019s involvement in 30% of leadership and management positions. \\n Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the overall strategic direction for CVR, vets and approves projects selected by PSCs, and helps to raise finances. The PAC\/PRC should exhibit a high degree of clarity on its roles and functions. Such entities meet on a semi-regular basis, usually after a certain number of CVR projects have been presented (a minimum of a week in advance) to PAC\/PRC members for consideration. The PAC\/PRC should ensure all proposals comply with gender quotas.", + "Paragraph": "CVR programmes may include different types of coordination mechanisms to guide CVR project selection, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation. Two common coordination mechanisms are: \n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsible for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC. (See below.) All project selec- tion should comply with gender quotas of a minimum of 30% of projects benefitting women, and women\u2019s involvement in 30% of leadership and management positions. \n Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the overall strategic direction for CVR, vets and approves projects selected by PSCs, and helps to raise finances. The PAC\/PRC should exhibit a high degree of clarity on its roles and functions. Such entities meet on a semi-regular basis, usually after a certain number of CVR projects have been presented (a minimum of a week in advance) to PAC\/PRC members for consideration. The PAC\/PRC should ensure all proposals comply with gender quotas.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -29550,14 +29550,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the overall strategic direction for CVR, vets and approves projects selected by PSCs, and helps to raise finances.", + "Sentence": "\n Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the overall strategic direction for CVR, vets and approves projects selected by PSCs, and helps to raise finances.", "newParagraph": "cvr programme may include different type coordination mechanism guide cvr project selection implementation monitoring evaluation two common coordination mechanism n project selection committee pscs communitybased pscs established selected area include representative sample stakeholder responsible selecting project vetted pacprc see project selec tion comply gender quota minimum 30 project benefitting woman woman involvement 30 leadership management position n project approvalreview committee pacprc pacprc set overall strategic direction cvr vet approves project selected pscs help raise finance pacprc exhibit high degree clarity role function entity meet semiregular basis usually certain number cvr project presented minimum week advance pacprc member consideration pacprc ensure proposal comply gender quota", "ProcessedSent": "n project approvalreview committee pacprc pacprc set overall strategic direction cvr vet approves project selected pscs help raise finance", "SentID": 1641 }, { "ParagraphID": 570, - "Paragraph": "CVR programmes may include different types of coordination mechanisms to guide CVR project selection, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation. Two common coordination mechanisms are: \\n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsible for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC. (See below.) All project selec- tion should comply with gender quotas of a minimum of 30% of projects benefitting women, and women\u2019s involvement in 30% of leadership and management positions. \\n Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the overall strategic direction for CVR, vets and approves projects selected by PSCs, and helps to raise finances. The PAC\/PRC should exhibit a high degree of clarity on its roles and functions. Such entities meet on a semi-regular basis, usually after a certain number of CVR projects have been presented (a minimum of a week in advance) to PAC\/PRC members for consideration. The PAC\/PRC should ensure all proposals comply with gender quotas.", + "Paragraph": "CVR programmes may include different types of coordination mechanisms to guide CVR project selection, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation. Two common coordination mechanisms are: \n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsible for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC. (See below.) All project selec- tion should comply with gender quotas of a minimum of 30% of projects benefitting women, and women\u2019s involvement in 30% of leadership and management positions. \n Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the overall strategic direction for CVR, vets and approves projects selected by PSCs, and helps to raise finances. The PAC\/PRC should exhibit a high degree of clarity on its roles and functions. Such entities meet on a semi-regular basis, usually after a certain number of CVR projects have been presented (a minimum of a week in advance) to PAC\/PRC members for consideration. The PAC\/PRC should ensure all proposals comply with gender quotas.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -29575,7 +29575,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 570, - "Paragraph": "CVR programmes may include different types of coordination mechanisms to guide CVR project selection, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation. Two common coordination mechanisms are: \\n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsible for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC. (See below.) All project selec- tion should comply with gender quotas of a minimum of 30% of projects benefitting women, and women\u2019s involvement in 30% of leadership and management positions. \\n Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the overall strategic direction for CVR, vets and approves projects selected by PSCs, and helps to raise finances. The PAC\/PRC should exhibit a high degree of clarity on its roles and functions. Such entities meet on a semi-regular basis, usually after a certain number of CVR projects have been presented (a minimum of a week in advance) to PAC\/PRC members for consideration. The PAC\/PRC should ensure all proposals comply with gender quotas.", + "Paragraph": "CVR programmes may include different types of coordination mechanisms to guide CVR project selection, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation. Two common coordination mechanisms are: \n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsible for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC. (See below.) All project selec- tion should comply with gender quotas of a minimum of 30% of projects benefitting women, and women\u2019s involvement in 30% of leadership and management positions. \n Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the overall strategic direction for CVR, vets and approves projects selected by PSCs, and helps to raise finances. The PAC\/PRC should exhibit a high degree of clarity on its roles and functions. Such entities meet on a semi-regular basis, usually after a certain number of CVR projects have been presented (a minimum of a week in advance) to PAC\/PRC members for consideration. The PAC\/PRC should ensure all proposals comply with gender quotas.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -29593,7 +29593,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 570, - "Paragraph": "CVR programmes may include different types of coordination mechanisms to guide CVR project selection, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation. Two common coordination mechanisms are: \\n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsible for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC. (See below.) All project selec- tion should comply with gender quotas of a minimum of 30% of projects benefitting women, and women\u2019s involvement in 30% of leadership and management positions. \\n Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the overall strategic direction for CVR, vets and approves projects selected by PSCs, and helps to raise finances. The PAC\/PRC should exhibit a high degree of clarity on its roles and functions. Such entities meet on a semi-regular basis, usually after a certain number of CVR projects have been presented (a minimum of a week in advance) to PAC\/PRC members for consideration. The PAC\/PRC should ensure all proposals comply with gender quotas.", + "Paragraph": "CVR programmes may include different types of coordination mechanisms to guide CVR project selection, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation. Two common coordination mechanisms are: \n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsible for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC. (See below.) All project selec- tion should comply with gender quotas of a minimum of 30% of projects benefitting women, and women\u2019s involvement in 30% of leadership and management positions. \n Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the overall strategic direction for CVR, vets and approves projects selected by PSCs, and helps to raise finances. The PAC\/PRC should exhibit a high degree of clarity on its roles and functions. Such entities meet on a semi-regular basis, usually after a certain number of CVR projects have been presented (a minimum of a week in advance) to PAC\/PRC members for consideration. The PAC\/PRC should ensure all proposals comply with gender quotas.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -29701,7 +29701,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 574, - "Paragraph": "When the preconditions for a DDR programme are absent, CVR may be used to contribute to security and stabilization, to help make the returns of stability more tangible, and to create more conducive environments for national and local peace processes. More specifically, CVR programmes can be used as a means to: \\n De-escalate violence during a preliminary ceasefire and build confidence before the signature of a Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) and the launch of a DDR programme; \\n Prevent at-risk individuals, particularly at-risk youth, from joining armed groups; \\n Stop former members of armed groups from rejoining these groups and from en- gaging in violent crime and destructive social unrest; \\n Provide stop-gap reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months), par- ticularly if demobilization is complete and reintegration support is still at the planning and\/or resource mobilization stage; \\n Encourage members of armed groups that have not signed on to peace agreements to move away from armed violence; \\n Reorient members of armed groups away from waging war and towards construc- tive activities; \\n Reduce violence in communities and neighbourhoods that are vulnerable to high rates of armed violence, organized crime and\/or sexual or gender-based violence; and \\n Increase the capacity of communities and neighbourhoods to absorb newly rein- serted and reintegrated former combatants.", + "Paragraph": "When the preconditions for a DDR programme are absent, CVR may be used to contribute to security and stabilization, to help make the returns of stability more tangible, and to create more conducive environments for national and local peace processes. More specifically, CVR programmes can be used as a means to: \n De-escalate violence during a preliminary ceasefire and build confidence before the signature of a Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) and the launch of a DDR programme; \n Prevent at-risk individuals, particularly at-risk youth, from joining armed groups; \n Stop former members of armed groups from rejoining these groups and from en- gaging in violent crime and destructive social unrest; \n Provide stop-gap reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months), par- ticularly if demobilization is complete and reintegration support is still at the planning and\/or resource mobilization stage; \n Encourage members of armed groups that have not signed on to peace agreements to move away from armed violence; \n Reorient members of armed groups away from waging war and towards construc- tive activities; \n Reduce violence in communities and neighbourhoods that are vulnerable to high rates of armed violence, organized crime and\/or sexual or gender-based violence; and \n Increase the capacity of communities and neighbourhoods to absorb newly rein- serted and reintegrated former combatants.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -29719,7 +29719,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 574, - "Paragraph": "When the preconditions for a DDR programme are absent, CVR may be used to contribute to security and stabilization, to help make the returns of stability more tangible, and to create more conducive environments for national and local peace processes. More specifically, CVR programmes can be used as a means to: \\n De-escalate violence during a preliminary ceasefire and build confidence before the signature of a Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) and the launch of a DDR programme; \\n Prevent at-risk individuals, particularly at-risk youth, from joining armed groups; \\n Stop former members of armed groups from rejoining these groups and from en- gaging in violent crime and destructive social unrest; \\n Provide stop-gap reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months), par- ticularly if demobilization is complete and reintegration support is still at the planning and\/or resource mobilization stage; \\n Encourage members of armed groups that have not signed on to peace agreements to move away from armed violence; \\n Reorient members of armed groups away from waging war and towards construc- tive activities; \\n Reduce violence in communities and neighbourhoods that are vulnerable to high rates of armed violence, organized crime and\/or sexual or gender-based violence; and \\n Increase the capacity of communities and neighbourhoods to absorb newly rein- serted and reintegrated former combatants.", + "Paragraph": "When the preconditions for a DDR programme are absent, CVR may be used to contribute to security and stabilization, to help make the returns of stability more tangible, and to create more conducive environments for national and local peace processes. More specifically, CVR programmes can be used as a means to: \n De-escalate violence during a preliminary ceasefire and build confidence before the signature of a Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) and the launch of a DDR programme; \n Prevent at-risk individuals, particularly at-risk youth, from joining armed groups; \n Stop former members of armed groups from rejoining these groups and from en- gaging in violent crime and destructive social unrest; \n Provide stop-gap reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months), par- ticularly if demobilization is complete and reintegration support is still at the planning and\/or resource mobilization stage; \n Encourage members of armed groups that have not signed on to peace agreements to move away from armed violence; \n Reorient members of armed groups away from waging war and towards construc- tive activities; \n Reduce violence in communities and neighbourhoods that are vulnerable to high rates of armed violence, organized crime and\/or sexual or gender-based violence; and \n Increase the capacity of communities and neighbourhoods to absorb newly rein- serted and reintegrated former combatants.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -29730,14 +29730,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "More specifically, CVR programmes can be used as a means to: \\n De-escalate violence during a preliminary ceasefire and build confidence before the signature of a Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) and the launch of a DDR programme; \\n Prevent at-risk individuals, particularly at-risk youth, from joining armed groups; \\n Stop former members of armed groups from rejoining these groups and from en- gaging in violent crime and destructive social unrest; \\n Provide stop-gap reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months), par- ticularly if demobilization is complete and reintegration support is still at the planning and\/or resource mobilization stage; \\n Encourage members of armed groups that have not signed on to peace agreements to move away from armed violence; \\n Reorient members of armed groups away from waging war and towards construc- tive activities; \\n Reduce violence in communities and neighbourhoods that are vulnerable to high rates of armed violence, organized crime and\/or sexual or gender-based violence; and \\n Increase the capacity of communities and neighbourhoods to absorb newly rein- serted and reintegrated former combatants.", + "Sentence": "More specifically, CVR programmes can be used as a means to: \n De-escalate violence during a preliminary ceasefire and build confidence before the signature of a Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) and the launch of a DDR programme; \n Prevent at-risk individuals, particularly at-risk youth, from joining armed groups; \n Stop former members of armed groups from rejoining these groups and from en- gaging in violent crime and destructive social unrest; \n Provide stop-gap reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months), par- ticularly if demobilization is complete and reintegration support is still at the planning and\/or resource mobilization stage; \n Encourage members of armed groups that have not signed on to peace agreements to move away from armed violence; \n Reorient members of armed groups away from waging war and towards construc- tive activities; \n Reduce violence in communities and neighbourhoods that are vulnerable to high rates of armed violence, organized crime and\/or sexual or gender-based violence; and \n Increase the capacity of communities and neighbourhoods to absorb newly rein- serted and reintegrated former combatants.", "newParagraph": "precondition ddr programme absent cvr may used contribute security stabilization help make return stability tangible create conducive environment national local peace process specifically cvr programme used mean n deescalate violence preliminary ceasefire build confidence signature comprehensive peace agreement cpa launch ddr programme n prevent atrisk individual particularly atrisk youth joining armed group n stop former member armed group rejoining group en gaging violent crime destructive social unrest n provide stopgap reinsertion assistance defined period 6 18 month par ticularly demobilization complete reintegration support still planning andor resource mobilization stage n encourage member armed group signed peace agreement move away armed violence n reorient member armed group away waging war towards construc tive activity n reduce violence community neighbourhood vulnerable high rate armed violence organized crime andor sexual genderbased violence n increase capacity community neighbourhood absorb newly rein serted reintegrated former combatant", "ProcessedSent": "specifically cvr programme used mean n deescalate violence preliminary ceasefire build confidence signature comprehensive peace agreement cpa launch ddr programme n prevent atrisk individual particularly atrisk youth joining armed group n stop former member armed group rejoining group en gaging violent crime destructive social unrest n provide stopgap reinsertion assistance defined period 6 18 month par ticularly demobilization complete reintegration support still planning andor resource mobilization stage n encourage member armed group signed peace agreement move away armed violence n reorient member armed group away waging war towards construc tive activity n reduce violence community neighbourhood vulnerable high rate armed violence organized crime andor sexual genderbased violence n increase capacity community neighbourhood absorb newly rein serted reintegrated former combatant", "SentID": 1651 }, { "ParagraphID": 575, - "Paragraph": "CVR programmes are typically short to medium term and include, but are not limited to, a combination of: \\n Weapons and ammunition management; \\n Labour-intensive short-term employment; \\n Vocational\/skills training and job employment; \\n Infrastructure improvement; \\n Community security and police rapprochement; \\n Educational outreach and social mobilization; \\n Mental health and psychosocial support, in both collective and individual formats; \\n Civic education; and \\n Gender transformative projects including education and awareness-raising pro- grammes with community members on gender, women\u2019s empowerment, and con- flict-related sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) prevention and response.", + "Paragraph": "CVR programmes are typically short to medium term and include, but are not limited to, a combination of: \n Weapons and ammunition management; \n Labour-intensive short-term employment; \n Vocational\/skills training and job employment; \n Infrastructure improvement; \n Community security and police rapprochement; \n Educational outreach and social mobilization; \n Mental health and psychosocial support, in both collective and individual formats; \n Civic education; and \n Gender transformative projects including education and awareness-raising pro- grammes with community members on gender, women\u2019s empowerment, and con- flict-related sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) prevention and response.", "Color": "#F07F4E", "Level": 1, "LevelName": "General IDDRS", @@ -29748,7 +29748,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "CVR programmes are typically short to medium term and include, but are not limited to, a combination of: \\n Weapons and ammunition management; \\n Labour-intensive short-term employment; \\n Vocational\/skills training and job employment; \\n Infrastructure improvement; \\n Community security and police rapprochement; \\n Educational outreach and social mobilization; \\n Mental health and psychosocial support, in both collective and individual formats; \\n Civic education; and \\n Gender transformative projects including education and awareness-raising pro- grammes with community members on gender, women\u2019s empowerment, and con- flict-related sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) prevention and response.", + "Sentence": "CVR programmes are typically short to medium term and include, but are not limited to, a combination of: \n Weapons and ammunition management; \n Labour-intensive short-term employment; \n Vocational\/skills training and job employment; \n Infrastructure improvement; \n Community security and police rapprochement; \n Educational outreach and social mobilization; \n Mental health and psychosocial support, in both collective and individual formats; \n Civic education; and \n Gender transformative projects including education and awareness-raising pro- grammes with community members on gender, women\u2019s empowerment, and con- flict-related sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) prevention and response.", "newParagraph": "cvr programme typically short medium term include limited combination n weapon ammunition management n labourintensive shortterm employment n vocationalskills training job employment n infrastructure improvement n community security police rapprochement n educational outreach social mobilization n mental health psychosocial support collective individual format n civic education n gender transformative project including education awarenessraising pro gramme community member gender woman empowerment con flictrelated sexual genderbased violence sgbv prevention response", "ProcessedSent": "cvr programme typically short medium term include limited combination n weapon ammunition management n labourintensive shortterm employment n vocationalskills training job employment n infrastructure improvement n community security police rapprochement n educational outreach social mobilization n mental health psychosocial support collective individual format n civic education n gender transformative project including education awarenessraising pro gramme community member gender woman empowerment con flictrelated sexual genderbased violence sgbv prevention response", "SentID": 1652 @@ -31483,7 +31483,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 601, - "Paragraph": "The target groups for CVR programmes may vary according to the context. (See section 6.4.) However, four categories stand out: \\n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme. These typically include ex-combatants and persons formerly associat- ed with armed groups who are waiting for support and could be perceived as a threat to broader security and stability. If reintegration support is delayed, CVR can serve as a stop-gap measure, providing temporary reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months) (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). \\n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement. These groups may include rebel factions, paramilitaries, militia groups, members of armed gangs or other entities that are not part of a peace agreement. This category may include individuals who voluntarily leave active armed groups, including those that are designated as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security Council (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). The status of these individuals and armed groups must be analysed and specified to mitigate any risks associated with their inclusion in CVR programmes. \\n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups. These individuals are not part of an established armed group and are therefore ineligible to participate in a DDR programme. They do, however, exhibit the potential to build peace and to contribute to the prevention of recruitment in their community. This wide category of beneficiaries can include male and female children and youth (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and 5.30 on Youth and DDR). \\n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants. In some cases, CVR may target communities and neighbourhoods that are situated close to cantonment sites and\/or vulnerable to high rates of political violence, organized crime, or sex- ual or gender-based violence. CVR can also be focused on a sample of productive members of a community to enhance their potential to absorb newly reinserted and reintegrated former combatants.", + "Paragraph": "The target groups for CVR programmes may vary according to the context. (See section 6.4.) However, four categories stand out: \n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme. These typically include ex-combatants and persons formerly associat- ed with armed groups who are waiting for support and could be perceived as a threat to broader security and stability. If reintegration support is delayed, CVR can serve as a stop-gap measure, providing temporary reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months) (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). \n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement. These groups may include rebel factions, paramilitaries, militia groups, members of armed gangs or other entities that are not part of a peace agreement. This category may include individuals who voluntarily leave active armed groups, including those that are designated as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security Council (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). The status of these individuals and armed groups must be analysed and specified to mitigate any risks associated with their inclusion in CVR programmes. \n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups. These individuals are not part of an established armed group and are therefore ineligible to participate in a DDR programme. They do, however, exhibit the potential to build peace and to contribute to the prevention of recruitment in their community. This wide category of beneficiaries can include male and female children and youth (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and 5.30 on Youth and DDR). \n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants. In some cases, CVR may target communities and neighbourhoods that are situated close to cantonment sites and\/or vulnerable to high rates of political violence, organized crime, or sex- ual or gender-based violence. CVR can also be focused on a sample of productive members of a community to enhance their potential to absorb newly reinserted and reintegrated former combatants.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -31501,7 +31501,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 601, - "Paragraph": "The target groups for CVR programmes may vary according to the context. (See section 6.4.) However, four categories stand out: \\n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme. These typically include ex-combatants and persons formerly associat- ed with armed groups who are waiting for support and could be perceived as a threat to broader security and stability. If reintegration support is delayed, CVR can serve as a stop-gap measure, providing temporary reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months) (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). \\n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement. These groups may include rebel factions, paramilitaries, militia groups, members of armed gangs or other entities that are not part of a peace agreement. This category may include individuals who voluntarily leave active armed groups, including those that are designated as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security Council (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). The status of these individuals and armed groups must be analysed and specified to mitigate any risks associated with their inclusion in CVR programmes. \\n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups. These individuals are not part of an established armed group and are therefore ineligible to participate in a DDR programme. They do, however, exhibit the potential to build peace and to contribute to the prevention of recruitment in their community. This wide category of beneficiaries can include male and female children and youth (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and 5.30 on Youth and DDR). \\n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants. In some cases, CVR may target communities and neighbourhoods that are situated close to cantonment sites and\/or vulnerable to high rates of political violence, organized crime, or sex- ual or gender-based violence. CVR can also be focused on a sample of productive members of a community to enhance their potential to absorb newly reinserted and reintegrated former combatants.", + "Paragraph": "The target groups for CVR programmes may vary according to the context. (See section 6.4.) However, four categories stand out: \n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme. These typically include ex-combatants and persons formerly associat- ed with armed groups who are waiting for support and could be perceived as a threat to broader security and stability. If reintegration support is delayed, CVR can serve as a stop-gap measure, providing temporary reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months) (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). \n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement. These groups may include rebel factions, paramilitaries, militia groups, members of armed gangs or other entities that are not part of a peace agreement. This category may include individuals who voluntarily leave active armed groups, including those that are designated as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security Council (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). The status of these individuals and armed groups must be analysed and specified to mitigate any risks associated with their inclusion in CVR programmes. \n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups. These individuals are not part of an established armed group and are therefore ineligible to participate in a DDR programme. They do, however, exhibit the potential to build peace and to contribute to the prevention of recruitment in their community. This wide category of beneficiaries can include male and female children and youth (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and 5.30 on Youth and DDR). \n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants. In some cases, CVR may target communities and neighbourhoods that are situated close to cantonment sites and\/or vulnerable to high rates of political violence, organized crime, or sex- ual or gender-based violence. CVR can also be focused on a sample of productive members of a community to enhance their potential to absorb newly reinserted and reintegrated former combatants.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -31519,7 +31519,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 601, - "Paragraph": "The target groups for CVR programmes may vary according to the context. (See section 6.4.) However, four categories stand out: \\n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme. These typically include ex-combatants and persons formerly associat- ed with armed groups who are waiting for support and could be perceived as a threat to broader security and stability. If reintegration support is delayed, CVR can serve as a stop-gap measure, providing temporary reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months) (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). \\n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement. These groups may include rebel factions, paramilitaries, militia groups, members of armed gangs or other entities that are not part of a peace agreement. This category may include individuals who voluntarily leave active armed groups, including those that are designated as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security Council (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). The status of these individuals and armed groups must be analysed and specified to mitigate any risks associated with their inclusion in CVR programmes. \\n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups. These individuals are not part of an established armed group and are therefore ineligible to participate in a DDR programme. They do, however, exhibit the potential to build peace and to contribute to the prevention of recruitment in their community. This wide category of beneficiaries can include male and female children and youth (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and 5.30 on Youth and DDR). \\n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants. In some cases, CVR may target communities and neighbourhoods that are situated close to cantonment sites and\/or vulnerable to high rates of political violence, organized crime, or sex- ual or gender-based violence. CVR can also be focused on a sample of productive members of a community to enhance their potential to absorb newly reinserted and reintegrated former combatants.", + "Paragraph": "The target groups for CVR programmes may vary according to the context. (See section 6.4.) However, four categories stand out: \n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme. These typically include ex-combatants and persons formerly associat- ed with armed groups who are waiting for support and could be perceived as a threat to broader security and stability. If reintegration support is delayed, CVR can serve as a stop-gap measure, providing temporary reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months) (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). \n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement. These groups may include rebel factions, paramilitaries, militia groups, members of armed gangs or other entities that are not part of a peace agreement. This category may include individuals who voluntarily leave active armed groups, including those that are designated as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security Council (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). The status of these individuals and armed groups must be analysed and specified to mitigate any risks associated with their inclusion in CVR programmes. \n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups. These individuals are not part of an established armed group and are therefore ineligible to participate in a DDR programme. They do, however, exhibit the potential to build peace and to contribute to the prevention of recruitment in their community. This wide category of beneficiaries can include male and female children and youth (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and 5.30 on Youth and DDR). \n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants. In some cases, CVR may target communities and neighbourhoods that are situated close to cantonment sites and\/or vulnerable to high rates of political violence, organized crime, or sex- ual or gender-based violence. CVR can also be focused on a sample of productive members of a community to enhance their potential to absorb newly reinserted and reintegrated former combatants.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -31530,14 +31530,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "However, four categories stand out: \\n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme.", + "Sentence": "However, four categories stand out: \n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme.", "newParagraph": "target group cvr programme may vary according context see section 64 however four category stand n former combatant part existing unsupported national ddr programme typically include excombatants person formerly associat ed armed group waiting support could perceived threat broader security stability reintegration support delayed cvr serve stopgap measure providing temporary reinsertion assistance defined period 6 18 month also see iddrs 420 demobilization n member armed group formally eligible ddr programme group signatory peace agreement group may include rebel faction paramilitary militia group member armed gang entity part peace agreement category may include individual voluntarily leave active armed group including designated terrorist organization united nation security council see iddrs 211 legal framework un ddr status individual armed group must analysed specified mitigate risk associated inclusion cvr programme n individual member armed group risk cruitment group individual part established armed group therefore ineligible participate ddr programme however exhibit potential build peace contribute prevention recruitment community wide category beneficiary include male female child youth see iddrs 520 child ddr 530 youth ddr n designated community susceptible outbreak violence close cantonment site likely receive former combatant case cvr may target community neighbourhood situated close cantonment site andor vulnerable high rate political violence organized crime sex ual genderbased violence cvr also focused sample productive member community enhance potential absorb newly reinserted reintegrated former combatant", "ProcessedSent": "however four category stand n former combatant part existing unsupported national ddr programme", "SentID": 1751 }, { "ParagraphID": 601, - "Paragraph": "The target groups for CVR programmes may vary according to the context. (See section 6.4.) However, four categories stand out: \\n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme. These typically include ex-combatants and persons formerly associat- ed with armed groups who are waiting for support and could be perceived as a threat to broader security and stability. If reintegration support is delayed, CVR can serve as a stop-gap measure, providing temporary reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months) (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). \\n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement. These groups may include rebel factions, paramilitaries, militia groups, members of armed gangs or other entities that are not part of a peace agreement. This category may include individuals who voluntarily leave active armed groups, including those that are designated as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security Council (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). The status of these individuals and armed groups must be analysed and specified to mitigate any risks associated with their inclusion in CVR programmes. \\n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups. These individuals are not part of an established armed group and are therefore ineligible to participate in a DDR programme. They do, however, exhibit the potential to build peace and to contribute to the prevention of recruitment in their community. This wide category of beneficiaries can include male and female children and youth (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and 5.30 on Youth and DDR). \\n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants. In some cases, CVR may target communities and neighbourhoods that are situated close to cantonment sites and\/or vulnerable to high rates of political violence, organized crime, or sex- ual or gender-based violence. CVR can also be focused on a sample of productive members of a community to enhance their potential to absorb newly reinserted and reintegrated former combatants.", + "Paragraph": "The target groups for CVR programmes may vary according to the context. (See section 6.4.) However, four categories stand out: \n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme. These typically include ex-combatants and persons formerly associat- ed with armed groups who are waiting for support and could be perceived as a threat to broader security and stability. If reintegration support is delayed, CVR can serve as a stop-gap measure, providing temporary reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months) (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). \n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement. These groups may include rebel factions, paramilitaries, militia groups, members of armed gangs or other entities that are not part of a peace agreement. This category may include individuals who voluntarily leave active armed groups, including those that are designated as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security Council (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). The status of these individuals and armed groups must be analysed and specified to mitigate any risks associated with their inclusion in CVR programmes. \n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups. These individuals are not part of an established armed group and are therefore ineligible to participate in a DDR programme. They do, however, exhibit the potential to build peace and to contribute to the prevention of recruitment in their community. This wide category of beneficiaries can include male and female children and youth (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and 5.30 on Youth and DDR). \n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants. In some cases, CVR may target communities and neighbourhoods that are situated close to cantonment sites and\/or vulnerable to high rates of political violence, organized crime, or sex- ual or gender-based violence. CVR can also be focused on a sample of productive members of a community to enhance their potential to absorb newly reinserted and reintegrated former combatants.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -31555,7 +31555,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 601, - "Paragraph": "The target groups for CVR programmes may vary according to the context. (See section 6.4.) However, four categories stand out: \\n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme. These typically include ex-combatants and persons formerly associat- ed with armed groups who are waiting for support and could be perceived as a threat to broader security and stability. If reintegration support is delayed, CVR can serve as a stop-gap measure, providing temporary reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months) (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). \\n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement. These groups may include rebel factions, paramilitaries, militia groups, members of armed gangs or other entities that are not part of a peace agreement. This category may include individuals who voluntarily leave active armed groups, including those that are designated as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security Council (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). The status of these individuals and armed groups must be analysed and specified to mitigate any risks associated with their inclusion in CVR programmes. \\n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups. These individuals are not part of an established armed group and are therefore ineligible to participate in a DDR programme. They do, however, exhibit the potential to build peace and to contribute to the prevention of recruitment in their community. This wide category of beneficiaries can include male and female children and youth (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and 5.30 on Youth and DDR). \\n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants. In some cases, CVR may target communities and neighbourhoods that are situated close to cantonment sites and\/or vulnerable to high rates of political violence, organized crime, or sex- ual or gender-based violence. CVR can also be focused on a sample of productive members of a community to enhance their potential to absorb newly reinserted and reintegrated former combatants.", + "Paragraph": "The target groups for CVR programmes may vary according to the context. (See section 6.4.) However, four categories stand out: \n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme. These typically include ex-combatants and persons formerly associat- ed with armed groups who are waiting for support and could be perceived as a threat to broader security and stability. If reintegration support is delayed, CVR can serve as a stop-gap measure, providing temporary reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months) (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). \n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement. These groups may include rebel factions, paramilitaries, militia groups, members of armed gangs or other entities that are not part of a peace agreement. This category may include individuals who voluntarily leave active armed groups, including those that are designated as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security Council (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). The status of these individuals and armed groups must be analysed and specified to mitigate any risks associated with their inclusion in CVR programmes. \n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups. These individuals are not part of an established armed group and are therefore ineligible to participate in a DDR programme. They do, however, exhibit the potential to build peace and to contribute to the prevention of recruitment in their community. This wide category of beneficiaries can include male and female children and youth (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and 5.30 on Youth and DDR). \n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants. In some cases, CVR may target communities and neighbourhoods that are situated close to cantonment sites and\/or vulnerable to high rates of political violence, organized crime, or sex- ual or gender-based violence. CVR can also be focused on a sample of productive members of a community to enhance their potential to absorb newly reinserted and reintegrated former combatants.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -31573,7 +31573,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 601, - "Paragraph": "The target groups for CVR programmes may vary according to the context. (See section 6.4.) However, four categories stand out: \\n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme. These typically include ex-combatants and persons formerly associat- ed with armed groups who are waiting for support and could be perceived as a threat to broader security and stability. If reintegration support is delayed, CVR can serve as a stop-gap measure, providing temporary reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months) (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). \\n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement. These groups may include rebel factions, paramilitaries, militia groups, members of armed gangs or other entities that are not part of a peace agreement. This category may include individuals who voluntarily leave active armed groups, including those that are designated as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security Council (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). The status of these individuals and armed groups must be analysed and specified to mitigate any risks associated with their inclusion in CVR programmes. \\n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups. These individuals are not part of an established armed group and are therefore ineligible to participate in a DDR programme. They do, however, exhibit the potential to build peace and to contribute to the prevention of recruitment in their community. This wide category of beneficiaries can include male and female children and youth (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and 5.30 on Youth and DDR). \\n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants. In some cases, CVR may target communities and neighbourhoods that are situated close to cantonment sites and\/or vulnerable to high rates of political violence, organized crime, or sex- ual or gender-based violence. CVR can also be focused on a sample of productive members of a community to enhance their potential to absorb newly reinserted and reintegrated former combatants.", + "Paragraph": "The target groups for CVR programmes may vary according to the context. (See section 6.4.) However, four categories stand out: \n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme. These typically include ex-combatants and persons formerly associat- ed with armed groups who are waiting for support and could be perceived as a threat to broader security and stability. If reintegration support is delayed, CVR can serve as a stop-gap measure, providing temporary reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months) (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). \n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement. These groups may include rebel factions, paramilitaries, militia groups, members of armed gangs or other entities that are not part of a peace agreement. This category may include individuals who voluntarily leave active armed groups, including those that are designated as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security Council (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). The status of these individuals and armed groups must be analysed and specified to mitigate any risks associated with their inclusion in CVR programmes. \n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups. These individuals are not part of an established armed group and are therefore ineligible to participate in a DDR programme. They do, however, exhibit the potential to build peace and to contribute to the prevention of recruitment in their community. This wide category of beneficiaries can include male and female children and youth (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and 5.30 on Youth and DDR). \n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants. In some cases, CVR may target communities and neighbourhoods that are situated close to cantonment sites and\/or vulnerable to high rates of political violence, organized crime, or sex- ual or gender-based violence. CVR can also be focused on a sample of productive members of a community to enhance their potential to absorb newly reinserted and reintegrated former combatants.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -31584,14 +31584,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement.", + "Sentence": "\n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement.", "newParagraph": "target group cvr programme may vary according context see section 64 however four category stand n former combatant part existing unsupported national ddr programme typically include excombatants person formerly associat ed armed group waiting support could perceived threat broader security stability reintegration support delayed cvr serve stopgap measure providing temporary reinsertion assistance defined period 6 18 month also see iddrs 420 demobilization n member armed group formally eligible ddr programme group signatory peace agreement group may include rebel faction paramilitary militia group member armed gang entity part peace agreement category may include individual voluntarily leave active armed group including designated terrorist organization united nation security council see iddrs 211 legal framework un ddr status individual armed group must analysed specified mitigate risk associated inclusion cvr programme n individual member armed group risk cruitment group individual part established armed group therefore ineligible participate ddr programme however exhibit potential build peace contribute prevention recruitment community wide category beneficiary include male female child youth see iddrs 520 child ddr 530 youth ddr n designated community susceptible outbreak violence close cantonment site likely receive former combatant case cvr may target community neighbourhood situated close cantonment site andor vulnerable high rate political violence organized crime sex ual genderbased violence cvr also focused sample productive member community enhance potential absorb newly reinserted reintegrated former combatant", "ProcessedSent": "n member armed group formally eligible ddr programme group signatory peace agreement", "SentID": 1754 }, { "ParagraphID": 601, - "Paragraph": "The target groups for CVR programmes may vary according to the context. (See section 6.4.) However, four categories stand out: \\n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme. These typically include ex-combatants and persons formerly associat- ed with armed groups who are waiting for support and could be perceived as a threat to broader security and stability. If reintegration support is delayed, CVR can serve as a stop-gap measure, providing temporary reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months) (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). \\n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement. These groups may include rebel factions, paramilitaries, militia groups, members of armed gangs or other entities that are not part of a peace agreement. This category may include individuals who voluntarily leave active armed groups, including those that are designated as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security Council (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). The status of these individuals and armed groups must be analysed and specified to mitigate any risks associated with their inclusion in CVR programmes. \\n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups. These individuals are not part of an established armed group and are therefore ineligible to participate in a DDR programme. They do, however, exhibit the potential to build peace and to contribute to the prevention of recruitment in their community. This wide category of beneficiaries can include male and female children and youth (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and 5.30 on Youth and DDR). \\n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants. In some cases, CVR may target communities and neighbourhoods that are situated close to cantonment sites and\/or vulnerable to high rates of political violence, organized crime, or sex- ual or gender-based violence. CVR can also be focused on a sample of productive members of a community to enhance their potential to absorb newly reinserted and reintegrated former combatants.", + "Paragraph": "The target groups for CVR programmes may vary according to the context. (See section 6.4.) However, four categories stand out: \n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme. These typically include ex-combatants and persons formerly associat- ed with armed groups who are waiting for support and could be perceived as a threat to broader security and stability. If reintegration support is delayed, CVR can serve as a stop-gap measure, providing temporary reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months) (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). \n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement. These groups may include rebel factions, paramilitaries, militia groups, members of armed gangs or other entities that are not part of a peace agreement. This category may include individuals who voluntarily leave active armed groups, including those that are designated as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security Council (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). The status of these individuals and armed groups must be analysed and specified to mitigate any risks associated with their inclusion in CVR programmes. \n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups. These individuals are not part of an established armed group and are therefore ineligible to participate in a DDR programme. They do, however, exhibit the potential to build peace and to contribute to the prevention of recruitment in their community. This wide category of beneficiaries can include male and female children and youth (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and 5.30 on Youth and DDR). \n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants. In some cases, CVR may target communities and neighbourhoods that are situated close to cantonment sites and\/or vulnerable to high rates of political violence, organized crime, or sex- ual or gender-based violence. CVR can also be focused on a sample of productive members of a community to enhance their potential to absorb newly reinserted and reintegrated former combatants.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -31609,7 +31609,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 601, - "Paragraph": "The target groups for CVR programmes may vary according to the context. (See section 6.4.) However, four categories stand out: \\n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme. These typically include ex-combatants and persons formerly associat- ed with armed groups who are waiting for support and could be perceived as a threat to broader security and stability. If reintegration support is delayed, CVR can serve as a stop-gap measure, providing temporary reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months) (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). \\n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement. These groups may include rebel factions, paramilitaries, militia groups, members of armed gangs or other entities that are not part of a peace agreement. This category may include individuals who voluntarily leave active armed groups, including those that are designated as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security Council (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). The status of these individuals and armed groups must be analysed and specified to mitigate any risks associated with their inclusion in CVR programmes. \\n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups. These individuals are not part of an established armed group and are therefore ineligible to participate in a DDR programme. They do, however, exhibit the potential to build peace and to contribute to the prevention of recruitment in their community. This wide category of beneficiaries can include male and female children and youth (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and 5.30 on Youth and DDR). \\n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants. In some cases, CVR may target communities and neighbourhoods that are situated close to cantonment sites and\/or vulnerable to high rates of political violence, organized crime, or sex- ual or gender-based violence. CVR can also be focused on a sample of productive members of a community to enhance their potential to absorb newly reinserted and reintegrated former combatants.", + "Paragraph": "The target groups for CVR programmes may vary according to the context. (See section 6.4.) However, four categories stand out: \n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme. These typically include ex-combatants and persons formerly associat- ed with armed groups who are waiting for support and could be perceived as a threat to broader security and stability. If reintegration support is delayed, CVR can serve as a stop-gap measure, providing temporary reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months) (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). \n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement. These groups may include rebel factions, paramilitaries, militia groups, members of armed gangs or other entities that are not part of a peace agreement. This category may include individuals who voluntarily leave active armed groups, including those that are designated as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security Council (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). The status of these individuals and armed groups must be analysed and specified to mitigate any risks associated with their inclusion in CVR programmes. \n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups. These individuals are not part of an established armed group and are therefore ineligible to participate in a DDR programme. They do, however, exhibit the potential to build peace and to contribute to the prevention of recruitment in their community. This wide category of beneficiaries can include male and female children and youth (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and 5.30 on Youth and DDR). \n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants. In some cases, CVR may target communities and neighbourhoods that are situated close to cantonment sites and\/or vulnerable to high rates of political violence, organized crime, or sex- ual or gender-based violence. CVR can also be focused on a sample of productive members of a community to enhance their potential to absorb newly reinserted and reintegrated former combatants.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -31627,7 +31627,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 601, - "Paragraph": "The target groups for CVR programmes may vary according to the context. (See section 6.4.) However, four categories stand out: \\n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme. These typically include ex-combatants and persons formerly associat- ed with armed groups who are waiting for support and could be perceived as a threat to broader security and stability. If reintegration support is delayed, CVR can serve as a stop-gap measure, providing temporary reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months) (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). \\n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement. These groups may include rebel factions, paramilitaries, militia groups, members of armed gangs or other entities that are not part of a peace agreement. This category may include individuals who voluntarily leave active armed groups, including those that are designated as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security Council (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). The status of these individuals and armed groups must be analysed and specified to mitigate any risks associated with their inclusion in CVR programmes. \\n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups. These individuals are not part of an established armed group and are therefore ineligible to participate in a DDR programme. They do, however, exhibit the potential to build peace and to contribute to the prevention of recruitment in their community. This wide category of beneficiaries can include male and female children and youth (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and 5.30 on Youth and DDR). \\n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants. In some cases, CVR may target communities and neighbourhoods that are situated close to cantonment sites and\/or vulnerable to high rates of political violence, organized crime, or sex- ual or gender-based violence. CVR can also be focused on a sample of productive members of a community to enhance their potential to absorb newly reinserted and reintegrated former combatants.", + "Paragraph": "The target groups for CVR programmes may vary according to the context. (See section 6.4.) However, four categories stand out: \n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme. These typically include ex-combatants and persons formerly associat- ed with armed groups who are waiting for support and could be perceived as a threat to broader security and stability. If reintegration support is delayed, CVR can serve as a stop-gap measure, providing temporary reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months) (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). \n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement. These groups may include rebel factions, paramilitaries, militia groups, members of armed gangs or other entities that are not part of a peace agreement. This category may include individuals who voluntarily leave active armed groups, including those that are designated as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security Council (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). The status of these individuals and armed groups must be analysed and specified to mitigate any risks associated with their inclusion in CVR programmes. \n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups. These individuals are not part of an established armed group and are therefore ineligible to participate in a DDR programme. They do, however, exhibit the potential to build peace and to contribute to the prevention of recruitment in their community. This wide category of beneficiaries can include male and female children and youth (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and 5.30 on Youth and DDR). \n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants. In some cases, CVR may target communities and neighbourhoods that are situated close to cantonment sites and\/or vulnerable to high rates of political violence, organized crime, or sex- ual or gender-based violence. CVR can also be focused on a sample of productive members of a community to enhance their potential to absorb newly reinserted and reintegrated former combatants.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -31645,7 +31645,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 601, - "Paragraph": "The target groups for CVR programmes may vary according to the context. (See section 6.4.) However, four categories stand out: \\n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme. These typically include ex-combatants and persons formerly associat- ed with armed groups who are waiting for support and could be perceived as a threat to broader security and stability. If reintegration support is delayed, CVR can serve as a stop-gap measure, providing temporary reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months) (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). \\n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement. These groups may include rebel factions, paramilitaries, militia groups, members of armed gangs or other entities that are not part of a peace agreement. This category may include individuals who voluntarily leave active armed groups, including those that are designated as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security Council (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). The status of these individuals and armed groups must be analysed and specified to mitigate any risks associated with their inclusion in CVR programmes. \\n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups. These individuals are not part of an established armed group and are therefore ineligible to participate in a DDR programme. They do, however, exhibit the potential to build peace and to contribute to the prevention of recruitment in their community. This wide category of beneficiaries can include male and female children and youth (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and 5.30 on Youth and DDR). \\n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants. In some cases, CVR may target communities and neighbourhoods that are situated close to cantonment sites and\/or vulnerable to high rates of political violence, organized crime, or sex- ual or gender-based violence. CVR can also be focused on a sample of productive members of a community to enhance their potential to absorb newly reinserted and reintegrated former combatants.", + "Paragraph": "The target groups for CVR programmes may vary according to the context. (See section 6.4.) However, four categories stand out: \n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme. These typically include ex-combatants and persons formerly associat- ed with armed groups who are waiting for support and could be perceived as a threat to broader security and stability. If reintegration support is delayed, CVR can serve as a stop-gap measure, providing temporary reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months) (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). \n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement. These groups may include rebel factions, paramilitaries, militia groups, members of armed gangs or other entities that are not part of a peace agreement. This category may include individuals who voluntarily leave active armed groups, including those that are designated as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security Council (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). The status of these individuals and armed groups must be analysed and specified to mitigate any risks associated with their inclusion in CVR programmes. \n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups. These individuals are not part of an established armed group and are therefore ineligible to participate in a DDR programme. They do, however, exhibit the potential to build peace and to contribute to the prevention of recruitment in their community. This wide category of beneficiaries can include male and female children and youth (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and 5.30 on Youth and DDR). \n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants. In some cases, CVR may target communities and neighbourhoods that are situated close to cantonment sites and\/or vulnerable to high rates of political violence, organized crime, or sex- ual or gender-based violence. CVR can also be focused on a sample of productive members of a community to enhance their potential to absorb newly reinserted and reintegrated former combatants.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -31656,14 +31656,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups.", + "Sentence": "\n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups.", "newParagraph": "target group cvr programme may vary according context see section 64 however four category stand n former combatant part existing unsupported national ddr programme typically include excombatants person formerly associat ed armed group waiting support could perceived threat broader security stability reintegration support delayed cvr serve stopgap measure providing temporary reinsertion assistance defined period 6 18 month also see iddrs 420 demobilization n member armed group formally eligible ddr programme group signatory peace agreement group may include rebel faction paramilitary militia group member armed gang entity part peace agreement category may include individual voluntarily leave active armed group including designated terrorist organization united nation security council see iddrs 211 legal framework un ddr status individual armed group must analysed specified mitigate risk associated inclusion cvr programme n individual member armed group risk cruitment group individual part established armed group therefore ineligible participate ddr programme however exhibit potential build peace contribute prevention recruitment community wide category beneficiary include male female child youth see iddrs 520 child ddr 530 youth ddr n designated community susceptible outbreak violence close cantonment site likely receive former combatant case cvr may target community neighbourhood situated close cantonment site andor vulnerable high rate political violence organized crime sex ual genderbased violence cvr also focused sample productive member community enhance potential absorb newly reinserted reintegrated former combatant", "ProcessedSent": "n individual member armed group risk cruitment group", "SentID": 1758 }, { "ParagraphID": 601, - "Paragraph": "The target groups for CVR programmes may vary according to the context. (See section 6.4.) However, four categories stand out: \\n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme. These typically include ex-combatants and persons formerly associat- ed with armed groups who are waiting for support and could be perceived as a threat to broader security and stability. If reintegration support is delayed, CVR can serve as a stop-gap measure, providing temporary reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months) (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). \\n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement. These groups may include rebel factions, paramilitaries, militia groups, members of armed gangs or other entities that are not part of a peace agreement. This category may include individuals who voluntarily leave active armed groups, including those that are designated as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security Council (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). The status of these individuals and armed groups must be analysed and specified to mitigate any risks associated with their inclusion in CVR programmes. \\n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups. These individuals are not part of an established armed group and are therefore ineligible to participate in a DDR programme. They do, however, exhibit the potential to build peace and to contribute to the prevention of recruitment in their community. This wide category of beneficiaries can include male and female children and youth (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and 5.30 on Youth and DDR). \\n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants. In some cases, CVR may target communities and neighbourhoods that are situated close to cantonment sites and\/or vulnerable to high rates of political violence, organized crime, or sex- ual or gender-based violence. CVR can also be focused on a sample of productive members of a community to enhance their potential to absorb newly reinserted and reintegrated former combatants.", + "Paragraph": "The target groups for CVR programmes may vary according to the context. (See section 6.4.) However, four categories stand out: \n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme. These typically include ex-combatants and persons formerly associat- ed with armed groups who are waiting for support and could be perceived as a threat to broader security and stability. If reintegration support is delayed, CVR can serve as a stop-gap measure, providing temporary reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months) (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). \n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement. These groups may include rebel factions, paramilitaries, militia groups, members of armed gangs or other entities that are not part of a peace agreement. This category may include individuals who voluntarily leave active armed groups, including those that are designated as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security Council (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). The status of these individuals and armed groups must be analysed and specified to mitigate any risks associated with their inclusion in CVR programmes. \n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups. These individuals are not part of an established armed group and are therefore ineligible to participate in a DDR programme. They do, however, exhibit the potential to build peace and to contribute to the prevention of recruitment in their community. This wide category of beneficiaries can include male and female children and youth (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and 5.30 on Youth and DDR). \n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants. In some cases, CVR may target communities and neighbourhoods that are situated close to cantonment sites and\/or vulnerable to high rates of political violence, organized crime, or sex- ual or gender-based violence. CVR can also be focused on a sample of productive members of a community to enhance their potential to absorb newly reinserted and reintegrated former combatants.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -31681,7 +31681,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 601, - "Paragraph": "The target groups for CVR programmes may vary according to the context. (See section 6.4.) However, four categories stand out: \\n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme. These typically include ex-combatants and persons formerly associat- ed with armed groups who are waiting for support and could be perceived as a threat to broader security and stability. If reintegration support is delayed, CVR can serve as a stop-gap measure, providing temporary reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months) (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). \\n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement. These groups may include rebel factions, paramilitaries, militia groups, members of armed gangs or other entities that are not part of a peace agreement. This category may include individuals who voluntarily leave active armed groups, including those that are designated as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security Council (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). The status of these individuals and armed groups must be analysed and specified to mitigate any risks associated with their inclusion in CVR programmes. \\n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups. These individuals are not part of an established armed group and are therefore ineligible to participate in a DDR programme. They do, however, exhibit the potential to build peace and to contribute to the prevention of recruitment in their community. This wide category of beneficiaries can include male and female children and youth (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and 5.30 on Youth and DDR). \\n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants. In some cases, CVR may target communities and neighbourhoods that are situated close to cantonment sites and\/or vulnerable to high rates of political violence, organized crime, or sex- ual or gender-based violence. CVR can also be focused on a sample of productive members of a community to enhance their potential to absorb newly reinserted and reintegrated former combatants.", + "Paragraph": "The target groups for CVR programmes may vary according to the context. (See section 6.4.) However, four categories stand out: \n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme. These typically include ex-combatants and persons formerly associat- ed with armed groups who are waiting for support and could be perceived as a threat to broader security and stability. If reintegration support is delayed, CVR can serve as a stop-gap measure, providing temporary reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months) (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). \n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement. These groups may include rebel factions, paramilitaries, militia groups, members of armed gangs or other entities that are not part of a peace agreement. This category may include individuals who voluntarily leave active armed groups, including those that are designated as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security Council (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). The status of these individuals and armed groups must be analysed and specified to mitigate any risks associated with their inclusion in CVR programmes. \n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups. These individuals are not part of an established armed group and are therefore ineligible to participate in a DDR programme. They do, however, exhibit the potential to build peace and to contribute to the prevention of recruitment in their community. This wide category of beneficiaries can include male and female children and youth (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and 5.30 on Youth and DDR). \n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants. In some cases, CVR may target communities and neighbourhoods that are situated close to cantonment sites and\/or vulnerable to high rates of political violence, organized crime, or sex- ual or gender-based violence. CVR can also be focused on a sample of productive members of a community to enhance their potential to absorb newly reinserted and reintegrated former combatants.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -31699,7 +31699,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 601, - "Paragraph": "The target groups for CVR programmes may vary according to the context. (See section 6.4.) However, four categories stand out: \\n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme. These typically include ex-combatants and persons formerly associat- ed with armed groups who are waiting for support and could be perceived as a threat to broader security and stability. If reintegration support is delayed, CVR can serve as a stop-gap measure, providing temporary reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months) (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). \\n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement. These groups may include rebel factions, paramilitaries, militia groups, members of armed gangs or other entities that are not part of a peace agreement. This category may include individuals who voluntarily leave active armed groups, including those that are designated as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security Council (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). The status of these individuals and armed groups must be analysed and specified to mitigate any risks associated with their inclusion in CVR programmes. \\n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups. These individuals are not part of an established armed group and are therefore ineligible to participate in a DDR programme. They do, however, exhibit the potential to build peace and to contribute to the prevention of recruitment in their community. This wide category of beneficiaries can include male and female children and youth (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and 5.30 on Youth and DDR). \\n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants. In some cases, CVR may target communities and neighbourhoods that are situated close to cantonment sites and\/or vulnerable to high rates of political violence, organized crime, or sex- ual or gender-based violence. CVR can also be focused on a sample of productive members of a community to enhance their potential to absorb newly reinserted and reintegrated former combatants.", + "Paragraph": "The target groups for CVR programmes may vary according to the context. (See section 6.4.) However, four categories stand out: \n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme. These typically include ex-combatants and persons formerly associat- ed with armed groups who are waiting for support and could be perceived as a threat to broader security and stability. If reintegration support is delayed, CVR can serve as a stop-gap measure, providing temporary reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months) (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). \n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement. These groups may include rebel factions, paramilitaries, militia groups, members of armed gangs or other entities that are not part of a peace agreement. This category may include individuals who voluntarily leave active armed groups, including those that are designated as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security Council (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). The status of these individuals and armed groups must be analysed and specified to mitigate any risks associated with their inclusion in CVR programmes. \n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups. These individuals are not part of an established armed group and are therefore ineligible to participate in a DDR programme. They do, however, exhibit the potential to build peace and to contribute to the prevention of recruitment in their community. This wide category of beneficiaries can include male and female children and youth (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and 5.30 on Youth and DDR). \n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants. In some cases, CVR may target communities and neighbourhoods that are situated close to cantonment sites and\/or vulnerable to high rates of political violence, organized crime, or sex- ual or gender-based violence. CVR can also be focused on a sample of productive members of a community to enhance their potential to absorb newly reinserted and reintegrated former combatants.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -31717,7 +31717,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 601, - "Paragraph": "The target groups for CVR programmes may vary according to the context. (See section 6.4.) However, four categories stand out: \\n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme. These typically include ex-combatants and persons formerly associat- ed with armed groups who are waiting for support and could be perceived as a threat to broader security and stability. If reintegration support is delayed, CVR can serve as a stop-gap measure, providing temporary reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months) (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). \\n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement. These groups may include rebel factions, paramilitaries, militia groups, members of armed gangs or other entities that are not part of a peace agreement. This category may include individuals who voluntarily leave active armed groups, including those that are designated as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security Council (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). The status of these individuals and armed groups must be analysed and specified to mitigate any risks associated with their inclusion in CVR programmes. \\n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups. These individuals are not part of an established armed group and are therefore ineligible to participate in a DDR programme. They do, however, exhibit the potential to build peace and to contribute to the prevention of recruitment in their community. This wide category of beneficiaries can include male and female children and youth (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and 5.30 on Youth and DDR). \\n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants. In some cases, CVR may target communities and neighbourhoods that are situated close to cantonment sites and\/or vulnerable to high rates of political violence, organized crime, or sex- ual or gender-based violence. CVR can also be focused on a sample of productive members of a community to enhance their potential to absorb newly reinserted and reintegrated former combatants.", + "Paragraph": "The target groups for CVR programmes may vary according to the context. (See section 6.4.) However, four categories stand out: \n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme. These typically include ex-combatants and persons formerly associat- ed with armed groups who are waiting for support and could be perceived as a threat to broader security and stability. If reintegration support is delayed, CVR can serve as a stop-gap measure, providing temporary reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months) (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). \n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement. These groups may include rebel factions, paramilitaries, militia groups, members of armed gangs or other entities that are not part of a peace agreement. This category may include individuals who voluntarily leave active armed groups, including those that are designated as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security Council (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). The status of these individuals and armed groups must be analysed and specified to mitigate any risks associated with their inclusion in CVR programmes. \n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups. These individuals are not part of an established armed group and are therefore ineligible to participate in a DDR programme. They do, however, exhibit the potential to build peace and to contribute to the prevention of recruitment in their community. This wide category of beneficiaries can include male and female children and youth (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and 5.30 on Youth and DDR). \n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants. In some cases, CVR may target communities and neighbourhoods that are situated close to cantonment sites and\/or vulnerable to high rates of political violence, organized crime, or sex- ual or gender-based violence. CVR can also be focused on a sample of productive members of a community to enhance their potential to absorb newly reinserted and reintegrated former combatants.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -31728,14 +31728,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants.", + "Sentence": "\n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants.", "newParagraph": "target group cvr programme may vary according context see section 64 however four category stand n former combatant part existing unsupported national ddr programme typically include excombatants person formerly associat ed armed group waiting support could perceived threat broader security stability reintegration support delayed cvr serve stopgap measure providing temporary reinsertion assistance defined period 6 18 month also see iddrs 420 demobilization n member armed group formally eligible ddr programme group signatory peace agreement group may include rebel faction paramilitary militia group member armed gang entity part peace agreement category may include individual voluntarily leave active armed group including designated terrorist organization united nation security council see iddrs 211 legal framework un ddr status individual armed group must analysed specified mitigate risk associated inclusion cvr programme n individual member armed group risk cruitment group individual part established armed group therefore ineligible participate ddr programme however exhibit potential build peace contribute prevention recruitment community wide category beneficiary include male female child youth see iddrs 520 child ddr 530 youth ddr n designated community susceptible outbreak violence close cantonment site likely receive former combatant case cvr may target community neighbourhood situated close cantonment site andor vulnerable high rate political violence organized crime sex ual genderbased violence cvr also focused sample productive member community enhance potential absorb newly reinserted reintegrated former combatant", "ProcessedSent": "n designated community susceptible outbreak violence close cantonment site likely receive former combatant", "SentID": 1762 }, { "ParagraphID": 601, - "Paragraph": "The target groups for CVR programmes may vary according to the context. (See section 6.4.) However, four categories stand out: \\n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme. These typically include ex-combatants and persons formerly associat- ed with armed groups who are waiting for support and could be perceived as a threat to broader security and stability. If reintegration support is delayed, CVR can serve as a stop-gap measure, providing temporary reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months) (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). \\n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement. These groups may include rebel factions, paramilitaries, militia groups, members of armed gangs or other entities that are not part of a peace agreement. This category may include individuals who voluntarily leave active armed groups, including those that are designated as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security Council (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). The status of these individuals and armed groups must be analysed and specified to mitigate any risks associated with their inclusion in CVR programmes. \\n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups. These individuals are not part of an established armed group and are therefore ineligible to participate in a DDR programme. They do, however, exhibit the potential to build peace and to contribute to the prevention of recruitment in their community. This wide category of beneficiaries can include male and female children and youth (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and 5.30 on Youth and DDR). \\n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants. In some cases, CVR may target communities and neighbourhoods that are situated close to cantonment sites and\/or vulnerable to high rates of political violence, organized crime, or sex- ual or gender-based violence. CVR can also be focused on a sample of productive members of a community to enhance their potential to absorb newly reinserted and reintegrated former combatants.", + "Paragraph": "The target groups for CVR programmes may vary according to the context. (See section 6.4.) However, four categories stand out: \n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme. These typically include ex-combatants and persons formerly associat- ed with armed groups who are waiting for support and could be perceived as a threat to broader security and stability. If reintegration support is delayed, CVR can serve as a stop-gap measure, providing temporary reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months) (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). \n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement. These groups may include rebel factions, paramilitaries, militia groups, members of armed gangs or other entities that are not part of a peace agreement. This category may include individuals who voluntarily leave active armed groups, including those that are designated as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security Council (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). The status of these individuals and armed groups must be analysed and specified to mitigate any risks associated with their inclusion in CVR programmes. \n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups. These individuals are not part of an established armed group and are therefore ineligible to participate in a DDR programme. They do, however, exhibit the potential to build peace and to contribute to the prevention of recruitment in their community. This wide category of beneficiaries can include male and female children and youth (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and 5.30 on Youth and DDR). \n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants. In some cases, CVR may target communities and neighbourhoods that are situated close to cantonment sites and\/or vulnerable to high rates of political violence, organized crime, or sex- ual or gender-based violence. CVR can also be focused on a sample of productive members of a community to enhance their potential to absorb newly reinserted and reintegrated former combatants.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -31753,7 +31753,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 601, - "Paragraph": "The target groups for CVR programmes may vary according to the context. (See section 6.4.) However, four categories stand out: \\n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme. These typically include ex-combatants and persons formerly associat- ed with armed groups who are waiting for support and could be perceived as a threat to broader security and stability. If reintegration support is delayed, CVR can serve as a stop-gap measure, providing temporary reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months) (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). \\n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement. These groups may include rebel factions, paramilitaries, militia groups, members of armed gangs or other entities that are not part of a peace agreement. This category may include individuals who voluntarily leave active armed groups, including those that are designated as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security Council (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). The status of these individuals and armed groups must be analysed and specified to mitigate any risks associated with their inclusion in CVR programmes. \\n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups. These individuals are not part of an established armed group and are therefore ineligible to participate in a DDR programme. They do, however, exhibit the potential to build peace and to contribute to the prevention of recruitment in their community. This wide category of beneficiaries can include male and female children and youth (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and 5.30 on Youth and DDR). \\n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants. In some cases, CVR may target communities and neighbourhoods that are situated close to cantonment sites and\/or vulnerable to high rates of political violence, organized crime, or sex- ual or gender-based violence. CVR can also be focused on a sample of productive members of a community to enhance their potential to absorb newly reinserted and reintegrated former combatants.", + "Paragraph": "The target groups for CVR programmes may vary according to the context. (See section 6.4.) However, four categories stand out: \n Former combatants who are part of an existing UN-supported or national DDR programme. These typically include ex-combatants and persons formerly associat- ed with armed groups who are waiting for support and could be perceived as a threat to broader security and stability. If reintegration support is delayed, CVR can serve as a stop-gap measure, providing temporary reinsertion assistance for a defined period (6\u201318 months) (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). \n Members of armed groups who are not formally eligible for a DDR programme because their group is not signatory to a peace agreement. These groups may include rebel factions, paramilitaries, militia groups, members of armed gangs or other entities that are not part of a peace agreement. This category may include individuals who voluntarily leave active armed groups, including those that are designated as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security Council (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). The status of these individuals and armed groups must be analysed and specified to mitigate any risks associated with their inclusion in CVR programmes. \n Individuals who are not members of an armed group, but who are at risk of re- cruitment by such groups. These individuals are not part of an established armed group and are therefore ineligible to participate in a DDR programme. They do, however, exhibit the potential to build peace and to contribute to the prevention of recruitment in their community. This wide category of beneficiaries can include male and female children and youth (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR and 5.30 on Youth and DDR). \n Designated communities that are susceptible to outbreaks of violence, close to cantonment sites, or likely to receive former combatants. In some cases, CVR may target communities and neighbourhoods that are situated close to cantonment sites and\/or vulnerable to high rates of political violence, organized crime, or sex- ual or gender-based violence. CVR can also be focused on a sample of productive members of a community to enhance their potential to absorb newly reinserted and reintegrated former combatants.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -33139,7 +33139,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 622, - "Paragraph": "Two commonly utilized CVR coordination mechanisms are: \\n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsi- ble for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC (see below). All project selection shall comply with gender quotas of a minimum of 30% of projects bene- fitting women, and women\u2019s involvement in 30% of leadership and management positions. \\n A Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the over- all strategic direction for CVR and vets and approves projects selected by PSCs. The PAC\/PRC should exhibit a high degree of clarity on its roles and functions. Such entities meet on a semi-regular basis, usually after a certain number of CVR projects have been presented (a minimum of a week in advance) to PAC\/PRC members for consideration. The PAC\/PRC may request changes to project proposals or ask for additional information to be provided. The PAC\/PRC shall ensure all proposals comply with gender quotas.", + "Paragraph": "Two commonly utilized CVR coordination mechanisms are: \n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsi- ble for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC (see below). All project selection shall comply with gender quotas of a minimum of 30% of projects bene- fitting women, and women\u2019s involvement in 30% of leadership and management positions. \n A Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the over- all strategic direction for CVR and vets and approves projects selected by PSCs. The PAC\/PRC should exhibit a high degree of clarity on its roles and functions. Such entities meet on a semi-regular basis, usually after a certain number of CVR projects have been presented (a minimum of a week in advance) to PAC\/PRC members for consideration. The PAC\/PRC may request changes to project proposals or ask for additional information to be provided. The PAC\/PRC shall ensure all proposals comply with gender quotas.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -33150,14 +33150,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 CVR strategy and coordination mechanisms", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Two commonly utilized CVR coordination mechanisms are: \\n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsi- ble for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC (see below).", + "Sentence": "Two commonly utilized CVR coordination mechanisms are: \n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsi- ble for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC (see below).", "newParagraph": "two commonly utilized cvr coordination mechanism n project selection committee pscs communitybased pscs established selected area include representative sample stakeholder responsi ble selecting project vetted pacprc see project selection shall comply gender quota minimum 30 project bene fitting woman woman involvement 30 leadership management position n project approvalreview committee pacprc pacprc set strategic direction cvr vet approves project selected pscs pacprc exhibit high degree clarity role function entity meet semiregular basis usually certain number cvr project presented minimum week advance pacprc member consideration pacprc may request change project proposal ask additional information provided pacprc shall ensure proposal comply gender quota", "ProcessedSent": "two commonly utilized cvr coordination mechanism n project selection committee pscs communitybased pscs established selected area include representative sample stakeholder responsi ble selecting project vetted pacprc see", "SentID": 1841 }, { "ParagraphID": 622, - "Paragraph": "Two commonly utilized CVR coordination mechanisms are: \\n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsi- ble for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC (see below). All project selection shall comply with gender quotas of a minimum of 30% of projects bene- fitting women, and women\u2019s involvement in 30% of leadership and management positions. \\n A Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the over- all strategic direction for CVR and vets and approves projects selected by PSCs. The PAC\/PRC should exhibit a high degree of clarity on its roles and functions. Such entities meet on a semi-regular basis, usually after a certain number of CVR projects have been presented (a minimum of a week in advance) to PAC\/PRC members for consideration. The PAC\/PRC may request changes to project proposals or ask for additional information to be provided. The PAC\/PRC shall ensure all proposals comply with gender quotas.", + "Paragraph": "Two commonly utilized CVR coordination mechanisms are: \n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsi- ble for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC (see below). All project selection shall comply with gender quotas of a minimum of 30% of projects bene- fitting women, and women\u2019s involvement in 30% of leadership and management positions. \n A Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the over- all strategic direction for CVR and vets and approves projects selected by PSCs. The PAC\/PRC should exhibit a high degree of clarity on its roles and functions. Such entities meet on a semi-regular basis, usually after a certain number of CVR projects have been presented (a minimum of a week in advance) to PAC\/PRC members for consideration. The PAC\/PRC may request changes to project proposals or ask for additional information to be provided. The PAC\/PRC shall ensure all proposals comply with gender quotas.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -33175,7 +33175,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 622, - "Paragraph": "Two commonly utilized CVR coordination mechanisms are: \\n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsi- ble for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC (see below). All project selection shall comply with gender quotas of a minimum of 30% of projects bene- fitting women, and women\u2019s involvement in 30% of leadership and management positions. \\n A Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the over- all strategic direction for CVR and vets and approves projects selected by PSCs. The PAC\/PRC should exhibit a high degree of clarity on its roles and functions. Such entities meet on a semi-regular basis, usually after a certain number of CVR projects have been presented (a minimum of a week in advance) to PAC\/PRC members for consideration. The PAC\/PRC may request changes to project proposals or ask for additional information to be provided. The PAC\/PRC shall ensure all proposals comply with gender quotas.", + "Paragraph": "Two commonly utilized CVR coordination mechanisms are: \n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsi- ble for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC (see below). All project selection shall comply with gender quotas of a minimum of 30% of projects bene- fitting women, and women\u2019s involvement in 30% of leadership and management positions. \n A Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the over- all strategic direction for CVR and vets and approves projects selected by PSCs. The PAC\/PRC should exhibit a high degree of clarity on its roles and functions. Such entities meet on a semi-regular basis, usually after a certain number of CVR projects have been presented (a minimum of a week in advance) to PAC\/PRC members for consideration. The PAC\/PRC may request changes to project proposals or ask for additional information to be provided. The PAC\/PRC shall ensure all proposals comply with gender quotas.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -33186,14 +33186,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 CVR strategy and coordination mechanisms", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n A Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the over- all strategic direction for CVR and vets and approves projects selected by PSCs.", + "Sentence": "\n A Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the over- all strategic direction for CVR and vets and approves projects selected by PSCs.", "newParagraph": "two commonly utilized cvr coordination mechanism n project selection committee pscs communitybased pscs established selected area include representative sample stakeholder responsi ble selecting project vetted pacprc see project selection shall comply gender quota minimum 30 project bene fitting woman woman involvement 30 leadership management position n project approvalreview committee pacprc pacprc set strategic direction cvr vet approves project selected pscs pacprc exhibit high degree clarity role function entity meet semiregular basis usually certain number cvr project presented minimum week advance pacprc member consideration pacprc may request change project proposal ask additional information provided pacprc shall ensure proposal comply gender quota", "ProcessedSent": "n project approvalreview committee pacprc pacprc set strategic direction cvr vet approves project selected pscs", "SentID": 1843 }, { "ParagraphID": 622, - "Paragraph": "Two commonly utilized CVR coordination mechanisms are: \\n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsi- ble for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC (see below). All project selection shall comply with gender quotas of a minimum of 30% of projects bene- fitting women, and women\u2019s involvement in 30% of leadership and management positions. \\n A Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the over- all strategic direction for CVR and vets and approves projects selected by PSCs. The PAC\/PRC should exhibit a high degree of clarity on its roles and functions. Such entities meet on a semi-regular basis, usually after a certain number of CVR projects have been presented (a minimum of a week in advance) to PAC\/PRC members for consideration. The PAC\/PRC may request changes to project proposals or ask for additional information to be provided. The PAC\/PRC shall ensure all proposals comply with gender quotas.", + "Paragraph": "Two commonly utilized CVR coordination mechanisms are: \n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsi- ble for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC (see below). All project selection shall comply with gender quotas of a minimum of 30% of projects bene- fitting women, and women\u2019s involvement in 30% of leadership and management positions. \n A Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the over- all strategic direction for CVR and vets and approves projects selected by PSCs. The PAC\/PRC should exhibit a high degree of clarity on its roles and functions. Such entities meet on a semi-regular basis, usually after a certain number of CVR projects have been presented (a minimum of a week in advance) to PAC\/PRC members for consideration. The PAC\/PRC may request changes to project proposals or ask for additional information to be provided. The PAC\/PRC shall ensure all proposals comply with gender quotas.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -33211,7 +33211,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 622, - "Paragraph": "Two commonly utilized CVR coordination mechanisms are: \\n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsi- ble for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC (see below). All project selection shall comply with gender quotas of a minimum of 30% of projects bene- fitting women, and women\u2019s involvement in 30% of leadership and management positions. \\n A Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the over- all strategic direction for CVR and vets and approves projects selected by PSCs. The PAC\/PRC should exhibit a high degree of clarity on its roles and functions. Such entities meet on a semi-regular basis, usually after a certain number of CVR projects have been presented (a minimum of a week in advance) to PAC\/PRC members for consideration. The PAC\/PRC may request changes to project proposals or ask for additional information to be provided. The PAC\/PRC shall ensure all proposals comply with gender quotas.", + "Paragraph": "Two commonly utilized CVR coordination mechanisms are: \n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsi- ble for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC (see below). All project selection shall comply with gender quotas of a minimum of 30% of projects bene- fitting women, and women\u2019s involvement in 30% of leadership and management positions. \n A Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the over- all strategic direction for CVR and vets and approves projects selected by PSCs. The PAC\/PRC should exhibit a high degree of clarity on its roles and functions. Such entities meet on a semi-regular basis, usually after a certain number of CVR projects have been presented (a minimum of a week in advance) to PAC\/PRC members for consideration. The PAC\/PRC may request changes to project proposals or ask for additional information to be provided. The PAC\/PRC shall ensure all proposals comply with gender quotas.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -33229,7 +33229,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 622, - "Paragraph": "Two commonly utilized CVR coordination mechanisms are: \\n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsi- ble for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC (see below). All project selection shall comply with gender quotas of a minimum of 30% of projects bene- fitting women, and women\u2019s involvement in 30% of leadership and management positions. \\n A Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the over- all strategic direction for CVR and vets and approves projects selected by PSCs. The PAC\/PRC should exhibit a high degree of clarity on its roles and functions. Such entities meet on a semi-regular basis, usually after a certain number of CVR projects have been presented (a minimum of a week in advance) to PAC\/PRC members for consideration. The PAC\/PRC may request changes to project proposals or ask for additional information to be provided. The PAC\/PRC shall ensure all proposals comply with gender quotas.", + "Paragraph": "Two commonly utilized CVR coordination mechanisms are: \n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsi- ble for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC (see below). All project selection shall comply with gender quotas of a minimum of 30% of projects bene- fitting women, and women\u2019s involvement in 30% of leadership and management positions. \n A Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the over- all strategic direction for CVR and vets and approves projects selected by PSCs. The PAC\/PRC should exhibit a high degree of clarity on its roles and functions. Such entities meet on a semi-regular basis, usually after a certain number of CVR projects have been presented (a minimum of a week in advance) to PAC\/PRC members for consideration. The PAC\/PRC may request changes to project proposals or ask for additional information to be provided. The PAC\/PRC shall ensure all proposals comply with gender quotas.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -33247,7 +33247,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 622, - "Paragraph": "Two commonly utilized CVR coordination mechanisms are: \\n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsi- ble for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC (see below). All project selection shall comply with gender quotas of a minimum of 30% of projects bene- fitting women, and women\u2019s involvement in 30% of leadership and management positions. \\n A Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the over- all strategic direction for CVR and vets and approves projects selected by PSCs. The PAC\/PRC should exhibit a high degree of clarity on its roles and functions. Such entities meet on a semi-regular basis, usually after a certain number of CVR projects have been presented (a minimum of a week in advance) to PAC\/PRC members for consideration. The PAC\/PRC may request changes to project proposals or ask for additional information to be provided. The PAC\/PRC shall ensure all proposals comply with gender quotas.", + "Paragraph": "Two commonly utilized CVR coordination mechanisms are: \n Project Selection Committees (PSCs): Community-based PSCs are established in selected areas, include a representative sample of stakeholders, and are responsi- ble for selecting projects that are vetted by the PAC\/PRC (see below). All project selection shall comply with gender quotas of a minimum of 30% of projects bene- fitting women, and women\u2019s involvement in 30% of leadership and management positions. \n A Project Approval\/Review Committee (PAC\/PRC): A PAC\/PRC sets the over- all strategic direction for CVR and vets and approves projects selected by PSCs. The PAC\/PRC should exhibit a high degree of clarity on its roles and functions. Such entities meet on a semi-regular basis, usually after a certain number of CVR projects have been presented (a minimum of a week in advance) to PAC\/PRC members for consideration. The PAC\/PRC may request changes to project proposals or ask for additional information to be provided. The PAC\/PRC shall ensure all proposals comply with gender quotas.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -34147,7 +34147,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 637, - "Paragraph": "In both mission and non-mission contexts, CVR programmes shall be preceded by regularly updated assessments, including but not limited to: \\n A security and consequence assessment accounting for the costs and benefits of conducting selected activities (and the risks of not conducting them). \\n A comprehensive and gender-responsive baseline assessment of local violence dynamics. This assessment should take note of factors that may contribute to violence (e.g., harmful use of alcohol and drugs) as well as the impact that vio- lence can have on mental health and well-being (e.g., acute stress, grief, depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder). It should also explicitly unpack the threats to security for men, women, boys and girls, and analyse the root causes of violence and insecurity, including their gender dimensions. \\n Conflict context analysis. \\n A detailed stakeholder mapping and a diagnostic of the capacities, interests and cohesiveness of communities and national institutions. \\n An assessment of local market conditions. \\n The dynamics of eligible and non-eligible armed groups \u2013 their leadership, internal dynamics, command and control, linkages with elites and external support.", + "Paragraph": "In both mission and non-mission contexts, CVR programmes shall be preceded by regularly updated assessments, including but not limited to: \n A security and consequence assessment accounting for the costs and benefits of conducting selected activities (and the risks of not conducting them). \n A comprehensive and gender-responsive baseline assessment of local violence dynamics. This assessment should take note of factors that may contribute to violence (e.g., harmful use of alcohol and drugs) as well as the impact that vio- lence can have on mental health and well-being (e.g., acute stress, grief, depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder). It should also explicitly unpack the threats to security for men, women, boys and girls, and analyse the root causes of violence and insecurity, including their gender dimensions. \n Conflict context analysis. \n A detailed stakeholder mapping and a diagnostic of the capacities, interests and cohesiveness of communities and national institutions. \n An assessment of local market conditions. \n The dynamics of eligible and non-eligible armed groups \u2013 their leadership, internal dynamics, command and control, linkages with elites and external support.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -34158,14 +34158,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.3 Assessments", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "In both mission and non-mission contexts, CVR programmes shall be preceded by regularly updated assessments, including but not limited to: \\n A security and consequence assessment accounting for the costs and benefits of conducting selected activities (and the risks of not conducting them).", + "Sentence": "In both mission and non-mission contexts, CVR programmes shall be preceded by regularly updated assessments, including but not limited to: \n A security and consequence assessment accounting for the costs and benefits of conducting selected activities (and the risks of not conducting them).", "newParagraph": "mission nonmission context cvr programme shall preceded regularly updated assessment including limited n security consequence assessment accounting cost benefit conducting selected activity risk conducting n comprehensive genderresponsive baseline assessment local violence dynamic assessment take note factor may contribute violence eg harmful use alcohol drug well impact vio lence mental health wellbeing eg acute stress grief depression post traumatic stress disorder also explicitly unpack threat security men woman boy girl analyse root cause violence insecurity including gender dimension n conflict context analysis n detailed stakeholder mapping diagnostic capacity interest cohesiveness community national institution n assessment local market condition n dynamic eligible noneligible armed group leadership internal dynamic command control linkage elite external support", "ProcessedSent": "mission nonmission context cvr programme shall preceded regularly updated assessment including limited n security consequence assessment accounting cost benefit conducting selected activity risk conducting", "SentID": 1897 }, { "ParagraphID": 637, - "Paragraph": "In both mission and non-mission contexts, CVR programmes shall be preceded by regularly updated assessments, including but not limited to: \\n A security and consequence assessment accounting for the costs and benefits of conducting selected activities (and the risks of not conducting them). \\n A comprehensive and gender-responsive baseline assessment of local violence dynamics. This assessment should take note of factors that may contribute to violence (e.g., harmful use of alcohol and drugs) as well as the impact that vio- lence can have on mental health and well-being (e.g., acute stress, grief, depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder). It should also explicitly unpack the threats to security for men, women, boys and girls, and analyse the root causes of violence and insecurity, including their gender dimensions. \\n Conflict context analysis. \\n A detailed stakeholder mapping and a diagnostic of the capacities, interests and cohesiveness of communities and national institutions. \\n An assessment of local market conditions. \\n The dynamics of eligible and non-eligible armed groups \u2013 their leadership, internal dynamics, command and control, linkages with elites and external support.", + "Paragraph": "In both mission and non-mission contexts, CVR programmes shall be preceded by regularly updated assessments, including but not limited to: \n A security and consequence assessment accounting for the costs and benefits of conducting selected activities (and the risks of not conducting them). \n A comprehensive and gender-responsive baseline assessment of local violence dynamics. This assessment should take note of factors that may contribute to violence (e.g., harmful use of alcohol and drugs) as well as the impact that vio- lence can have on mental health and well-being (e.g., acute stress, grief, depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder). It should also explicitly unpack the threats to security for men, women, boys and girls, and analyse the root causes of violence and insecurity, including their gender dimensions. \n Conflict context analysis. \n A detailed stakeholder mapping and a diagnostic of the capacities, interests and cohesiveness of communities and national institutions. \n An assessment of local market conditions. \n The dynamics of eligible and non-eligible armed groups \u2013 their leadership, internal dynamics, command and control, linkages with elites and external support.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -34176,14 +34176,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.3 Assessments", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n A comprehensive and gender-responsive baseline assessment of local violence dynamics.", + "Sentence": "\n A comprehensive and gender-responsive baseline assessment of local violence dynamics.", "newParagraph": "mission nonmission context cvr programme shall preceded regularly updated assessment including limited n security consequence assessment accounting cost benefit conducting selected activity risk conducting n comprehensive genderresponsive baseline assessment local violence dynamic assessment take note factor may contribute violence eg harmful use alcohol drug well impact vio lence mental health wellbeing eg acute stress grief depression post traumatic stress disorder also explicitly unpack threat security men woman boy girl analyse root cause violence insecurity including gender dimension n conflict context analysis n detailed stakeholder mapping diagnostic capacity interest cohesiveness community national institution n assessment local market condition n dynamic eligible noneligible armed group leadership internal dynamic command control linkage elite external support", "ProcessedSent": "n comprehensive genderresponsive baseline assessment local violence dynamic", "SentID": 1898 }, { "ParagraphID": 637, - "Paragraph": "In both mission and non-mission contexts, CVR programmes shall be preceded by regularly updated assessments, including but not limited to: \\n A security and consequence assessment accounting for the costs and benefits of conducting selected activities (and the risks of not conducting them). \\n A comprehensive and gender-responsive baseline assessment of local violence dynamics. This assessment should take note of factors that may contribute to violence (e.g., harmful use of alcohol and drugs) as well as the impact that vio- lence can have on mental health and well-being (e.g., acute stress, grief, depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder). It should also explicitly unpack the threats to security for men, women, boys and girls, and analyse the root causes of violence and insecurity, including their gender dimensions. \\n Conflict context analysis. \\n A detailed stakeholder mapping and a diagnostic of the capacities, interests and cohesiveness of communities and national institutions. \\n An assessment of local market conditions. \\n The dynamics of eligible and non-eligible armed groups \u2013 their leadership, internal dynamics, command and control, linkages with elites and external support.", + "Paragraph": "In both mission and non-mission contexts, CVR programmes shall be preceded by regularly updated assessments, including but not limited to: \n A security and consequence assessment accounting for the costs and benefits of conducting selected activities (and the risks of not conducting them). \n A comprehensive and gender-responsive baseline assessment of local violence dynamics. This assessment should take note of factors that may contribute to violence (e.g., harmful use of alcohol and drugs) as well as the impact that vio- lence can have on mental health and well-being (e.g., acute stress, grief, depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder). It should also explicitly unpack the threats to security for men, women, boys and girls, and analyse the root causes of violence and insecurity, including their gender dimensions. \n Conflict context analysis. \n A detailed stakeholder mapping and a diagnostic of the capacities, interests and cohesiveness of communities and national institutions. \n An assessment of local market conditions. \n The dynamics of eligible and non-eligible armed groups \u2013 their leadership, internal dynamics, command and control, linkages with elites and external support.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -34201,7 +34201,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 637, - "Paragraph": "In both mission and non-mission contexts, CVR programmes shall be preceded by regularly updated assessments, including but not limited to: \\n A security and consequence assessment accounting for the costs and benefits of conducting selected activities (and the risks of not conducting them). \\n A comprehensive and gender-responsive baseline assessment of local violence dynamics. This assessment should take note of factors that may contribute to violence (e.g., harmful use of alcohol and drugs) as well as the impact that vio- lence can have on mental health and well-being (e.g., acute stress, grief, depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder). It should also explicitly unpack the threats to security for men, women, boys and girls, and analyse the root causes of violence and insecurity, including their gender dimensions. \\n Conflict context analysis. \\n A detailed stakeholder mapping and a diagnostic of the capacities, interests and cohesiveness of communities and national institutions. \\n An assessment of local market conditions. \\n The dynamics of eligible and non-eligible armed groups \u2013 their leadership, internal dynamics, command and control, linkages with elites and external support.", + "Paragraph": "In both mission and non-mission contexts, CVR programmes shall be preceded by regularly updated assessments, including but not limited to: \n A security and consequence assessment accounting for the costs and benefits of conducting selected activities (and the risks of not conducting them). \n A comprehensive and gender-responsive baseline assessment of local violence dynamics. This assessment should take note of factors that may contribute to violence (e.g., harmful use of alcohol and drugs) as well as the impact that vio- lence can have on mental health and well-being (e.g., acute stress, grief, depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder). It should also explicitly unpack the threats to security for men, women, boys and girls, and analyse the root causes of violence and insecurity, including their gender dimensions. \n Conflict context analysis. \n A detailed stakeholder mapping and a diagnostic of the capacities, interests and cohesiveness of communities and national institutions. \n An assessment of local market conditions. \n The dynamics of eligible and non-eligible armed groups \u2013 their leadership, internal dynamics, command and control, linkages with elites and external support.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -34219,7 +34219,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 637, - "Paragraph": "In both mission and non-mission contexts, CVR programmes shall be preceded by regularly updated assessments, including but not limited to: \\n A security and consequence assessment accounting for the costs and benefits of conducting selected activities (and the risks of not conducting them). \\n A comprehensive and gender-responsive baseline assessment of local violence dynamics. This assessment should take note of factors that may contribute to violence (e.g., harmful use of alcohol and drugs) as well as the impact that vio- lence can have on mental health and well-being (e.g., acute stress, grief, depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder). It should also explicitly unpack the threats to security for men, women, boys and girls, and analyse the root causes of violence and insecurity, including their gender dimensions. \\n Conflict context analysis. \\n A detailed stakeholder mapping and a diagnostic of the capacities, interests and cohesiveness of communities and national institutions. \\n An assessment of local market conditions. \\n The dynamics of eligible and non-eligible armed groups \u2013 their leadership, internal dynamics, command and control, linkages with elites and external support.", + "Paragraph": "In both mission and non-mission contexts, CVR programmes shall be preceded by regularly updated assessments, including but not limited to: \n A security and consequence assessment accounting for the costs and benefits of conducting selected activities (and the risks of not conducting them). \n A comprehensive and gender-responsive baseline assessment of local violence dynamics. This assessment should take note of factors that may contribute to violence (e.g., harmful use of alcohol and drugs) as well as the impact that vio- lence can have on mental health and well-being (e.g., acute stress, grief, depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder). It should also explicitly unpack the threats to security for men, women, boys and girls, and analyse the root causes of violence and insecurity, including their gender dimensions. \n Conflict context analysis. \n A detailed stakeholder mapping and a diagnostic of the capacities, interests and cohesiveness of communities and national institutions. \n An assessment of local market conditions. \n The dynamics of eligible and non-eligible armed groups \u2013 their leadership, internal dynamics, command and control, linkages with elites and external support.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -34230,14 +34230,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.3 Assessments", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Conflict context analysis.", + "Sentence": "\n Conflict context analysis.", "newParagraph": "mission nonmission context cvr programme shall preceded regularly updated assessment including limited n security consequence assessment accounting cost benefit conducting selected activity risk conducting n comprehensive genderresponsive baseline assessment local violence dynamic assessment take note factor may contribute violence eg harmful use alcohol drug well impact vio lence mental health wellbeing eg acute stress grief depression post traumatic stress disorder also explicitly unpack threat security men woman boy girl analyse root cause violence insecurity including gender dimension n conflict context analysis n detailed stakeholder mapping diagnostic capacity interest cohesiveness community national institution n assessment local market condition n dynamic eligible noneligible armed group leadership internal dynamic command control linkage elite external support", "ProcessedSent": "n conflict context analysis", "SentID": 1901 }, { "ParagraphID": 637, - "Paragraph": "In both mission and non-mission contexts, CVR programmes shall be preceded by regularly updated assessments, including but not limited to: \\n A security and consequence assessment accounting for the costs and benefits of conducting selected activities (and the risks of not conducting them). \\n A comprehensive and gender-responsive baseline assessment of local violence dynamics. This assessment should take note of factors that may contribute to violence (e.g., harmful use of alcohol and drugs) as well as the impact that vio- lence can have on mental health and well-being (e.g., acute stress, grief, depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder). It should also explicitly unpack the threats to security for men, women, boys and girls, and analyse the root causes of violence and insecurity, including their gender dimensions. \\n Conflict context analysis. \\n A detailed stakeholder mapping and a diagnostic of the capacities, interests and cohesiveness of communities and national institutions. \\n An assessment of local market conditions. \\n The dynamics of eligible and non-eligible armed groups \u2013 their leadership, internal dynamics, command and control, linkages with elites and external support.", + "Paragraph": "In both mission and non-mission contexts, CVR programmes shall be preceded by regularly updated assessments, including but not limited to: \n A security and consequence assessment accounting for the costs and benefits of conducting selected activities (and the risks of not conducting them). \n A comprehensive and gender-responsive baseline assessment of local violence dynamics. This assessment should take note of factors that may contribute to violence (e.g., harmful use of alcohol and drugs) as well as the impact that vio- lence can have on mental health and well-being (e.g., acute stress, grief, depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder). It should also explicitly unpack the threats to security for men, women, boys and girls, and analyse the root causes of violence and insecurity, including their gender dimensions. \n Conflict context analysis. \n A detailed stakeholder mapping and a diagnostic of the capacities, interests and cohesiveness of communities and national institutions. \n An assessment of local market conditions. \n The dynamics of eligible and non-eligible armed groups \u2013 their leadership, internal dynamics, command and control, linkages with elites and external support.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -34248,14 +34248,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.3 Assessments", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n A detailed stakeholder mapping and a diagnostic of the capacities, interests and cohesiveness of communities and national institutions.", + "Sentence": "\n A detailed stakeholder mapping and a diagnostic of the capacities, interests and cohesiveness of communities and national institutions.", "newParagraph": "mission nonmission context cvr programme shall preceded regularly updated assessment including limited n security consequence assessment accounting cost benefit conducting selected activity risk conducting n comprehensive genderresponsive baseline assessment local violence dynamic assessment take note factor may contribute violence eg harmful use alcohol drug well impact vio lence mental health wellbeing eg acute stress grief depression post traumatic stress disorder also explicitly unpack threat security men woman boy girl analyse root cause violence insecurity including gender dimension n conflict context analysis n detailed stakeholder mapping diagnostic capacity interest cohesiveness community national institution n assessment local market condition n dynamic eligible noneligible armed group leadership internal dynamic command control linkage elite external support", "ProcessedSent": "n detailed stakeholder mapping diagnostic capacity interest cohesiveness community national institution", "SentID": 1902 }, { "ParagraphID": 637, - "Paragraph": "In both mission and non-mission contexts, CVR programmes shall be preceded by regularly updated assessments, including but not limited to: \\n A security and consequence assessment accounting for the costs and benefits of conducting selected activities (and the risks of not conducting them). \\n A comprehensive and gender-responsive baseline assessment of local violence dynamics. This assessment should take note of factors that may contribute to violence (e.g., harmful use of alcohol and drugs) as well as the impact that vio- lence can have on mental health and well-being (e.g., acute stress, grief, depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder). It should also explicitly unpack the threats to security for men, women, boys and girls, and analyse the root causes of violence and insecurity, including their gender dimensions. \\n Conflict context analysis. \\n A detailed stakeholder mapping and a diagnostic of the capacities, interests and cohesiveness of communities and national institutions. \\n An assessment of local market conditions. \\n The dynamics of eligible and non-eligible armed groups \u2013 their leadership, internal dynamics, command and control, linkages with elites and external support.", + "Paragraph": "In both mission and non-mission contexts, CVR programmes shall be preceded by regularly updated assessments, including but not limited to: \n A security and consequence assessment accounting for the costs and benefits of conducting selected activities (and the risks of not conducting them). \n A comprehensive and gender-responsive baseline assessment of local violence dynamics. This assessment should take note of factors that may contribute to violence (e.g., harmful use of alcohol and drugs) as well as the impact that vio- lence can have on mental health and well-being (e.g., acute stress, grief, depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder). It should also explicitly unpack the threats to security for men, women, boys and girls, and analyse the root causes of violence and insecurity, including their gender dimensions. \n Conflict context analysis. \n A detailed stakeholder mapping and a diagnostic of the capacities, interests and cohesiveness of communities and national institutions. \n An assessment of local market conditions. \n The dynamics of eligible and non-eligible armed groups \u2013 their leadership, internal dynamics, command and control, linkages with elites and external support.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -34266,14 +34266,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.3 Assessments", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n An assessment of local market conditions.", + "Sentence": "\n An assessment of local market conditions.", "newParagraph": "mission nonmission context cvr programme shall preceded regularly updated assessment including limited n security consequence assessment accounting cost benefit conducting selected activity risk conducting n comprehensive genderresponsive baseline assessment local violence dynamic assessment take note factor may contribute violence eg harmful use alcohol drug well impact vio lence mental health wellbeing eg acute stress grief depression post traumatic stress disorder also explicitly unpack threat security men woman boy girl analyse root cause violence insecurity including gender dimension n conflict context analysis n detailed stakeholder mapping diagnostic capacity interest cohesiveness community national institution n assessment local market condition n dynamic eligible noneligible armed group leadership internal dynamic command control linkage elite external support", "ProcessedSent": "n assessment local market condition", "SentID": 1903 }, { "ParagraphID": 637, - "Paragraph": "In both mission and non-mission contexts, CVR programmes shall be preceded by regularly updated assessments, including but not limited to: \\n A security and consequence assessment accounting for the costs and benefits of conducting selected activities (and the risks of not conducting them). \\n A comprehensive and gender-responsive baseline assessment of local violence dynamics. This assessment should take note of factors that may contribute to violence (e.g., harmful use of alcohol and drugs) as well as the impact that vio- lence can have on mental health and well-being (e.g., acute stress, grief, depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder). It should also explicitly unpack the threats to security for men, women, boys and girls, and analyse the root causes of violence and insecurity, including their gender dimensions. \\n Conflict context analysis. \\n A detailed stakeholder mapping and a diagnostic of the capacities, interests and cohesiveness of communities and national institutions. \\n An assessment of local market conditions. \\n The dynamics of eligible and non-eligible armed groups \u2013 their leadership, internal dynamics, command and control, linkages with elites and external support.", + "Paragraph": "In both mission and non-mission contexts, CVR programmes shall be preceded by regularly updated assessments, including but not limited to: \n A security and consequence assessment accounting for the costs and benefits of conducting selected activities (and the risks of not conducting them). \n A comprehensive and gender-responsive baseline assessment of local violence dynamics. This assessment should take note of factors that may contribute to violence (e.g., harmful use of alcohol and drugs) as well as the impact that vio- lence can have on mental health and well-being (e.g., acute stress, grief, depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder). It should also explicitly unpack the threats to security for men, women, boys and girls, and analyse the root causes of violence and insecurity, including their gender dimensions. \n Conflict context analysis. \n A detailed stakeholder mapping and a diagnostic of the capacities, interests and cohesiveness of communities and national institutions. \n An assessment of local market conditions. \n The dynamics of eligible and non-eligible armed groups \u2013 their leadership, internal dynamics, command and control, linkages with elites and external support.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -34284,7 +34284,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.3 Assessments", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The dynamics of eligible and non-eligible armed groups \u2013 their leadership, internal dynamics, command and control, linkages with elites and external support.", + "Sentence": "\n The dynamics of eligible and non-eligible armed groups \u2013 their leadership, internal dynamics, command and control, linkages with elites and external support.", "newParagraph": "mission nonmission context cvr programme shall preceded regularly updated assessment including limited n security consequence assessment accounting cost benefit conducting selected activity risk conducting n comprehensive genderresponsive baseline assessment local violence dynamic assessment take note factor may contribute violence eg harmful use alcohol drug well impact vio lence mental health wellbeing eg acute stress grief depression post traumatic stress disorder also explicitly unpack threat security men woman boy girl analyse root cause violence insecurity including gender dimension n conflict context analysis n detailed stakeholder mapping diagnostic capacity interest cohesiveness community national institution n assessment local market condition n dynamic eligible noneligible armed group leadership internal dynamic command control linkage elite external support", "ProcessedSent": "n dynamic eligible noneligible armed group leadership internal dynamic command control linkage elite external support", "SentID": 1904 @@ -34381,7 +34381,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 639, - "Paragraph": "The selection of CVR target groups and intervention sites is a political decision that should be taken on the basis of assessments (see section 6.3), and in consultation with national and\/or local government authorities. The identification of target groups and locations for CVR should also be informed through: \\n The priorities of the host government and, if in a mission context, the mandate of the mission; and \\n Consultations with UN senior management.", + "Paragraph": "The selection of CVR target groups and intervention sites is a political decision that should be taken on the basis of assessments (see section 6.3), and in consultation with national and\/or local government authorities. The identification of target groups and locations for CVR should also be informed through: \n The priorities of the host government and, if in a mission context, the mandate of the mission; and \n Consultations with UN senior management.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -34399,7 +34399,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 639, - "Paragraph": "The selection of CVR target groups and intervention sites is a political decision that should be taken on the basis of assessments (see section 6.3), and in consultation with national and\/or local government authorities. The identification of target groups and locations for CVR should also be informed through: \\n The priorities of the host government and, if in a mission context, the mandate of the mission; and \\n Consultations with UN senior management.", + "Paragraph": "The selection of CVR target groups and intervention sites is a political decision that should be taken on the basis of assessments (see section 6.3), and in consultation with national and\/or local government authorities. The identification of target groups and locations for CVR should also be informed through: \n The priorities of the host government and, if in a mission context, the mandate of the mission; and \n Consultations with UN senior management.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -34410,7 +34410,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.4 Target groups and locations", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The identification of target groups and locations for CVR should also be informed through: \\n The priorities of the host government and, if in a mission context, the mandate of the mission; and \\n Consultations with UN senior management.", + "Sentence": "The identification of target groups and locations for CVR should also be informed through: \n The priorities of the host government and, if in a mission context, the mandate of the mission; and \n Consultations with UN senior management.", "newParagraph": "selection cvr target group intervention site political decision taken basis assessment see section 63 consultation national andor local government authority identification target group location cvr also informed n priority host government mission context mandate mission n consultation un senior management", "ProcessedSent": "identification target group location cvr also informed n priority host government mission context mandate mission n consultation un senior management", "SentID": 1911 @@ -34489,7 +34489,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 641, - "Paragraph": "Clear criteria for who is included and excluded from CVR programmes should be carefully communicated in order to avoid unnecessarily inflating expectations and generating tension. One means of doing this is to prepare a glossary with specific selection criteria that can be shared with implementing partners and PSCs. In all cases, DDR practitioners shall ensure that women and girls are adequately represented in the iden- tification of priorities and implementation strategies, by making sure that: \\n Assessments include separate focus group discussions for women, led by female facilitators. \\n Women\u2019s groups are engaged in the consultative process and as implementing partners. \\n The PAC\/PRC (or equivalent entity) is 30% female. \\n A minimum of 30% of CVR projects within the broader CVR programme directly benefit women\u2019s safety and security issues. \\n The entire CVR programme integrates and leverages opportunities for women\u2019s leadership and gender equality. \\n Staffing of CVR projects includes female employees.", + "Paragraph": "Clear criteria for who is included and excluded from CVR programmes should be carefully communicated in order to avoid unnecessarily inflating expectations and generating tension. One means of doing this is to prepare a glossary with specific selection criteria that can be shared with implementing partners and PSCs. In all cases, DDR practitioners shall ensure that women and girls are adequately represented in the iden- tification of priorities and implementation strategies, by making sure that: \n Assessments include separate focus group discussions for women, led by female facilitators. \n Women\u2019s groups are engaged in the consultative process and as implementing partners. \n The PAC\/PRC (or equivalent entity) is 30% female. \n A minimum of 30% of CVR projects within the broader CVR programme directly benefit women\u2019s safety and security issues. \n The entire CVR programme integrates and leverages opportunities for women\u2019s leadership and gender equality. \n Staffing of CVR projects includes female employees.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -34507,7 +34507,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 641, - "Paragraph": "Clear criteria for who is included and excluded from CVR programmes should be carefully communicated in order to avoid unnecessarily inflating expectations and generating tension. One means of doing this is to prepare a glossary with specific selection criteria that can be shared with implementing partners and PSCs. In all cases, DDR practitioners shall ensure that women and girls are adequately represented in the iden- tification of priorities and implementation strategies, by making sure that: \\n Assessments include separate focus group discussions for women, led by female facilitators. \\n Women\u2019s groups are engaged in the consultative process and as implementing partners. \\n The PAC\/PRC (or equivalent entity) is 30% female. \\n A minimum of 30% of CVR projects within the broader CVR programme directly benefit women\u2019s safety and security issues. \\n The entire CVR programme integrates and leverages opportunities for women\u2019s leadership and gender equality. \\n Staffing of CVR projects includes female employees.", + "Paragraph": "Clear criteria for who is included and excluded from CVR programmes should be carefully communicated in order to avoid unnecessarily inflating expectations and generating tension. One means of doing this is to prepare a glossary with specific selection criteria that can be shared with implementing partners and PSCs. In all cases, DDR practitioners shall ensure that women and girls are adequately represented in the iden- tification of priorities and implementation strategies, by making sure that: \n Assessments include separate focus group discussions for women, led by female facilitators. \n Women\u2019s groups are engaged in the consultative process and as implementing partners. \n The PAC\/PRC (or equivalent entity) is 30% female. \n A minimum of 30% of CVR projects within the broader CVR programme directly benefit women\u2019s safety and security issues. \n The entire CVR programme integrates and leverages opportunities for women\u2019s leadership and gender equality. \n Staffing of CVR projects includes female employees.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -34525,7 +34525,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 641, - "Paragraph": "Clear criteria for who is included and excluded from CVR programmes should be carefully communicated in order to avoid unnecessarily inflating expectations and generating tension. One means of doing this is to prepare a glossary with specific selection criteria that can be shared with implementing partners and PSCs. In all cases, DDR practitioners shall ensure that women and girls are adequately represented in the iden- tification of priorities and implementation strategies, by making sure that: \\n Assessments include separate focus group discussions for women, led by female facilitators. \\n Women\u2019s groups are engaged in the consultative process and as implementing partners. \\n The PAC\/PRC (or equivalent entity) is 30% female. \\n A minimum of 30% of CVR projects within the broader CVR programme directly benefit women\u2019s safety and security issues. \\n The entire CVR programme integrates and leverages opportunities for women\u2019s leadership and gender equality. \\n Staffing of CVR projects includes female employees.", + "Paragraph": "Clear criteria for who is included and excluded from CVR programmes should be carefully communicated in order to avoid unnecessarily inflating expectations and generating tension. One means of doing this is to prepare a glossary with specific selection criteria that can be shared with implementing partners and PSCs. In all cases, DDR practitioners shall ensure that women and girls are adequately represented in the iden- tification of priorities and implementation strategies, by making sure that: \n Assessments include separate focus group discussions for women, led by female facilitators. \n Women\u2019s groups are engaged in the consultative process and as implementing partners. \n The PAC\/PRC (or equivalent entity) is 30% female. \n A minimum of 30% of CVR projects within the broader CVR programme directly benefit women\u2019s safety and security issues. \n The entire CVR programme integrates and leverages opportunities for women\u2019s leadership and gender equality. \n Staffing of CVR projects includes female employees.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -34536,14 +34536,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.4 Target groups and locations", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "In all cases, DDR practitioners shall ensure that women and girls are adequately represented in the iden- tification of priorities and implementation strategies, by making sure that: \\n Assessments include separate focus group discussions for women, led by female facilitators.", + "Sentence": "In all cases, DDR practitioners shall ensure that women and girls are adequately represented in the iden- tification of priorities and implementation strategies, by making sure that: \n Assessments include separate focus group discussions for women, led by female facilitators.", "newParagraph": "clear criterion included excluded cvr programme carefully communicated order avoid unnecessarily inflating expectation generating tension one mean prepare glossary specific selection criterion shared implementing partner pscs case ddr practitioner shall ensure woman girl adequately represented iden tification priority implementation strategy making sure n assessment include separate focus group discussion woman led female facilitator n woman group engaged consultative process implementing partner n pacprc equivalent entity 30 female n minimum 30 cvr project within broader cvr programme directly benefit woman safety security issue n entire cvr programme integrates leverage opportunity woman leadership gender equality n staffing cvr project includes female employee", "ProcessedSent": "case ddr practitioner shall ensure woman girl adequately represented iden tification priority implementation strategy making sure n assessment include separate focus group discussion woman led female facilitator", "SentID": 1918 }, { "ParagraphID": 641, - "Paragraph": "Clear criteria for who is included and excluded from CVR programmes should be carefully communicated in order to avoid unnecessarily inflating expectations and generating tension. One means of doing this is to prepare a glossary with specific selection criteria that can be shared with implementing partners and PSCs. In all cases, DDR practitioners shall ensure that women and girls are adequately represented in the iden- tification of priorities and implementation strategies, by making sure that: \\n Assessments include separate focus group discussions for women, led by female facilitators. \\n Women\u2019s groups are engaged in the consultative process and as implementing partners. \\n The PAC\/PRC (or equivalent entity) is 30% female. \\n A minimum of 30% of CVR projects within the broader CVR programme directly benefit women\u2019s safety and security issues. \\n The entire CVR programme integrates and leverages opportunities for women\u2019s leadership and gender equality. \\n Staffing of CVR projects includes female employees.", + "Paragraph": "Clear criteria for who is included and excluded from CVR programmes should be carefully communicated in order to avoid unnecessarily inflating expectations and generating tension. One means of doing this is to prepare a glossary with specific selection criteria that can be shared with implementing partners and PSCs. In all cases, DDR practitioners shall ensure that women and girls are adequately represented in the iden- tification of priorities and implementation strategies, by making sure that: \n Assessments include separate focus group discussions for women, led by female facilitators. \n Women\u2019s groups are engaged in the consultative process and as implementing partners. \n The PAC\/PRC (or equivalent entity) is 30% female. \n A minimum of 30% of CVR projects within the broader CVR programme directly benefit women\u2019s safety and security issues. \n The entire CVR programme integrates and leverages opportunities for women\u2019s leadership and gender equality. \n Staffing of CVR projects includes female employees.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -34554,14 +34554,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.4 Target groups and locations", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Women\u2019s groups are engaged in the consultative process and as implementing partners.", + "Sentence": "\n Women\u2019s groups are engaged in the consultative process and as implementing partners.", "newParagraph": "clear criterion included excluded cvr programme carefully communicated order avoid unnecessarily inflating expectation generating tension one mean prepare glossary specific selection criterion shared implementing partner pscs case ddr practitioner shall ensure woman girl adequately represented iden tification priority implementation strategy making sure n assessment include separate focus group discussion woman led female facilitator n woman group engaged consultative process implementing partner n pacprc equivalent entity 30 female n minimum 30 cvr project within broader cvr programme directly benefit woman safety security issue n entire cvr programme integrates leverage opportunity woman leadership gender equality n staffing cvr project includes female employee", "ProcessedSent": "n woman group engaged consultative process implementing partner", "SentID": 1919 }, { "ParagraphID": 641, - "Paragraph": "Clear criteria for who is included and excluded from CVR programmes should be carefully communicated in order to avoid unnecessarily inflating expectations and generating tension. One means of doing this is to prepare a glossary with specific selection criteria that can be shared with implementing partners and PSCs. In all cases, DDR practitioners shall ensure that women and girls are adequately represented in the iden- tification of priorities and implementation strategies, by making sure that: \\n Assessments include separate focus group discussions for women, led by female facilitators. \\n Women\u2019s groups are engaged in the consultative process and as implementing partners. \\n The PAC\/PRC (or equivalent entity) is 30% female. \\n A minimum of 30% of CVR projects within the broader CVR programme directly benefit women\u2019s safety and security issues. \\n The entire CVR programme integrates and leverages opportunities for women\u2019s leadership and gender equality. \\n Staffing of CVR projects includes female employees.", + "Paragraph": "Clear criteria for who is included and excluded from CVR programmes should be carefully communicated in order to avoid unnecessarily inflating expectations and generating tension. One means of doing this is to prepare a glossary with specific selection criteria that can be shared with implementing partners and PSCs. In all cases, DDR practitioners shall ensure that women and girls are adequately represented in the iden- tification of priorities and implementation strategies, by making sure that: \n Assessments include separate focus group discussions for women, led by female facilitators. \n Women\u2019s groups are engaged in the consultative process and as implementing partners. \n The PAC\/PRC (or equivalent entity) is 30% female. \n A minimum of 30% of CVR projects within the broader CVR programme directly benefit women\u2019s safety and security issues. \n The entire CVR programme integrates and leverages opportunities for women\u2019s leadership and gender equality. \n Staffing of CVR projects includes female employees.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -34572,14 +34572,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.4 Target groups and locations", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The PAC\/PRC (or equivalent entity) is 30% female.", + "Sentence": "\n The PAC\/PRC (or equivalent entity) is 30% female.", "newParagraph": "clear criterion included excluded cvr programme carefully communicated order avoid unnecessarily inflating expectation generating tension one mean prepare glossary specific selection criterion shared implementing partner pscs case ddr practitioner shall ensure woman girl adequately represented iden tification priority implementation strategy making sure n assessment include separate focus group discussion woman led female facilitator n woman group engaged consultative process implementing partner n pacprc equivalent entity 30 female n minimum 30 cvr project within broader cvr programme directly benefit woman safety security issue n entire cvr programme integrates leverage opportunity woman leadership gender equality n staffing cvr project includes female employee", "ProcessedSent": "n pacprc equivalent entity 30 female", "SentID": 1920 }, { "ParagraphID": 641, - "Paragraph": "Clear criteria for who is included and excluded from CVR programmes should be carefully communicated in order to avoid unnecessarily inflating expectations and generating tension. One means of doing this is to prepare a glossary with specific selection criteria that can be shared with implementing partners and PSCs. In all cases, DDR practitioners shall ensure that women and girls are adequately represented in the iden- tification of priorities and implementation strategies, by making sure that: \\n Assessments include separate focus group discussions for women, led by female facilitators. \\n Women\u2019s groups are engaged in the consultative process and as implementing partners. \\n The PAC\/PRC (or equivalent entity) is 30% female. \\n A minimum of 30% of CVR projects within the broader CVR programme directly benefit women\u2019s safety and security issues. \\n The entire CVR programme integrates and leverages opportunities for women\u2019s leadership and gender equality. \\n Staffing of CVR projects includes female employees.", + "Paragraph": "Clear criteria for who is included and excluded from CVR programmes should be carefully communicated in order to avoid unnecessarily inflating expectations and generating tension. One means of doing this is to prepare a glossary with specific selection criteria that can be shared with implementing partners and PSCs. In all cases, DDR practitioners shall ensure that women and girls are adequately represented in the iden- tification of priorities and implementation strategies, by making sure that: \n Assessments include separate focus group discussions for women, led by female facilitators. \n Women\u2019s groups are engaged in the consultative process and as implementing partners. \n The PAC\/PRC (or equivalent entity) is 30% female. \n A minimum of 30% of CVR projects within the broader CVR programme directly benefit women\u2019s safety and security issues. \n The entire CVR programme integrates and leverages opportunities for women\u2019s leadership and gender equality. \n Staffing of CVR projects includes female employees.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -34590,14 +34590,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.4 Target groups and locations", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n A minimum of 30% of CVR projects within the broader CVR programme directly benefit women\u2019s safety and security issues.", + "Sentence": "\n A minimum of 30% of CVR projects within the broader CVR programme directly benefit women\u2019s safety and security issues.", "newParagraph": "clear criterion included excluded cvr programme carefully communicated order avoid unnecessarily inflating expectation generating tension one mean prepare glossary specific selection criterion shared implementing partner pscs case ddr practitioner shall ensure woman girl adequately represented iden tification priority implementation strategy making sure n assessment include separate focus group discussion woman led female facilitator n woman group engaged consultative process implementing partner n pacprc equivalent entity 30 female n minimum 30 cvr project within broader cvr programme directly benefit woman safety security issue n entire cvr programme integrates leverage opportunity woman leadership gender equality n staffing cvr project includes female employee", "ProcessedSent": "n minimum 30 cvr project within broader cvr programme directly benefit woman safety security issue", "SentID": 1921 }, { "ParagraphID": 641, - "Paragraph": "Clear criteria for who is included and excluded from CVR programmes should be carefully communicated in order to avoid unnecessarily inflating expectations and generating tension. One means of doing this is to prepare a glossary with specific selection criteria that can be shared with implementing partners and PSCs. In all cases, DDR practitioners shall ensure that women and girls are adequately represented in the iden- tification of priorities and implementation strategies, by making sure that: \\n Assessments include separate focus group discussions for women, led by female facilitators. \\n Women\u2019s groups are engaged in the consultative process and as implementing partners. \\n The PAC\/PRC (or equivalent entity) is 30% female. \\n A minimum of 30% of CVR projects within the broader CVR programme directly benefit women\u2019s safety and security issues. \\n The entire CVR programme integrates and leverages opportunities for women\u2019s leadership and gender equality. \\n Staffing of CVR projects includes female employees.", + "Paragraph": "Clear criteria for who is included and excluded from CVR programmes should be carefully communicated in order to avoid unnecessarily inflating expectations and generating tension. One means of doing this is to prepare a glossary with specific selection criteria that can be shared with implementing partners and PSCs. In all cases, DDR practitioners shall ensure that women and girls are adequately represented in the iden- tification of priorities and implementation strategies, by making sure that: \n Assessments include separate focus group discussions for women, led by female facilitators. \n Women\u2019s groups are engaged in the consultative process and as implementing partners. \n The PAC\/PRC (or equivalent entity) is 30% female. \n A minimum of 30% of CVR projects within the broader CVR programme directly benefit women\u2019s safety and security issues. \n The entire CVR programme integrates and leverages opportunities for women\u2019s leadership and gender equality. \n Staffing of CVR projects includes female employees.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -34608,14 +34608,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.4 Target groups and locations", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The entire CVR programme integrates and leverages opportunities for women\u2019s leadership and gender equality.", + "Sentence": "\n The entire CVR programme integrates and leverages opportunities for women\u2019s leadership and gender equality.", "newParagraph": "clear criterion included excluded cvr programme carefully communicated order avoid unnecessarily inflating expectation generating tension one mean prepare glossary specific selection criterion shared implementing partner pscs case ddr practitioner shall ensure woman girl adequately represented iden tification priority implementation strategy making sure n assessment include separate focus group discussion woman led female facilitator n woman group engaged consultative process implementing partner n pacprc equivalent entity 30 female n minimum 30 cvr project within broader cvr programme directly benefit woman safety security issue n entire cvr programme integrates leverage opportunity woman leadership gender equality n staffing cvr project includes female employee", "ProcessedSent": "n entire cvr programme integrates leverage opportunity woman leadership gender equality", "SentID": 1922 }, { "ParagraphID": 641, - "Paragraph": "Clear criteria for who is included and excluded from CVR programmes should be carefully communicated in order to avoid unnecessarily inflating expectations and generating tension. One means of doing this is to prepare a glossary with specific selection criteria that can be shared with implementing partners and PSCs. In all cases, DDR practitioners shall ensure that women and girls are adequately represented in the iden- tification of priorities and implementation strategies, by making sure that: \\n Assessments include separate focus group discussions for women, led by female facilitators. \\n Women\u2019s groups are engaged in the consultative process and as implementing partners. \\n The PAC\/PRC (or equivalent entity) is 30% female. \\n A minimum of 30% of CVR projects within the broader CVR programme directly benefit women\u2019s safety and security issues. \\n The entire CVR programme integrates and leverages opportunities for women\u2019s leadership and gender equality. \\n Staffing of CVR projects includes female employees.", + "Paragraph": "Clear criteria for who is included and excluded from CVR programmes should be carefully communicated in order to avoid unnecessarily inflating expectations and generating tension. One means of doing this is to prepare a glossary with specific selection criteria that can be shared with implementing partners and PSCs. In all cases, DDR practitioners shall ensure that women and girls are adequately represented in the iden- tification of priorities and implementation strategies, by making sure that: \n Assessments include separate focus group discussions for women, led by female facilitators. \n Women\u2019s groups are engaged in the consultative process and as implementing partners. \n The PAC\/PRC (or equivalent entity) is 30% female. \n A minimum of 30% of CVR projects within the broader CVR programme directly benefit women\u2019s safety and security issues. \n The entire CVR programme integrates and leverages opportunities for women\u2019s leadership and gender equality. \n Staffing of CVR projects includes female employees.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -34626,7 +34626,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.4 Target groups and locations", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Staffing of CVR projects includes female employees.", + "Sentence": "\n Staffing of CVR projects includes female employees.", "newParagraph": "clear criterion included excluded cvr programme carefully communicated order avoid unnecessarily inflating expectation generating tension one mean prepare glossary specific selection criterion shared implementing partner pscs case ddr practitioner shall ensure woman girl adequately represented iden tification priority implementation strategy making sure n assessment include separate focus group discussion woman led female facilitator n woman group engaged consultative process implementing partner n pacprc equivalent entity 30 female n minimum 30 cvr project within broader cvr programme directly benefit woman safety security issue n entire cvr programme integrates leverage opportunity woman leadership gender equality n staffing cvr project includes female employee", "ProcessedSent": "n staffing cvr project includes female employee", "SentID": 1923 @@ -36343,7 +36343,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 661, - "Paragraph": "This module explains the shift introduced by IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR concerning reintegration support to ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups. Reintegration support has long been presented as a component of post-conflict DDR programmes, i.e., DDR programmes supported when the following preconditions are in place: \\n The signing of a negotiated ceasefire and\/or peace agreement that provides the framework for DDR; \\n Trust in the peace process; \\n Willingness of the parties to the armed conflict to engage in DDR; and \\n A minimum guarantee of security.", + "Paragraph": "This module explains the shift introduced by IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR concerning reintegration support to ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups. Reintegration support has long been presented as a component of post-conflict DDR programmes, i.e., DDR programmes supported when the following preconditions are in place: \n The signing of a negotiated ceasefire and\/or peace agreement that provides the framework for DDR; \n Trust in the peace process; \n Willingness of the parties to the armed conflict to engage in DDR; and \n A minimum guarantee of security.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -36361,7 +36361,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 661, - "Paragraph": "This module explains the shift introduced by IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR concerning reintegration support to ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups. Reintegration support has long been presented as a component of post-conflict DDR programmes, i.e., DDR programmes supported when the following preconditions are in place: \\n The signing of a negotiated ceasefire and\/or peace agreement that provides the framework for DDR; \\n Trust in the peace process; \\n Willingness of the parties to the armed conflict to engage in DDR; and \\n A minimum guarantee of security.", + "Paragraph": "This module explains the shift introduced by IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR concerning reintegration support to ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups. Reintegration support has long been presented as a component of post-conflict DDR programmes, i.e., DDR programmes supported when the following preconditions are in place: \n The signing of a negotiated ceasefire and\/or peace agreement that provides the framework for DDR; \n Trust in the peace process; \n Willingness of the parties to the armed conflict to engage in DDR; and \n A minimum guarantee of security.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -36372,7 +36372,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Reintegration support has long been presented as a component of post-conflict DDR programmes, i.e., DDR programmes supported when the following preconditions are in place: \\n The signing of a negotiated ceasefire and\/or peace agreement that provides the framework for DDR; \\n Trust in the peace process; \\n Willingness of the parties to the armed conflict to engage in DDR; and \\n A minimum guarantee of security.", + "Sentence": "Reintegration support has long been presented as a component of post-conflict DDR programmes, i.e., DDR programmes supported when the following preconditions are in place: \n The signing of a negotiated ceasefire and\/or peace agreement that provides the framework for DDR; \n Trust in the peace process; \n Willingness of the parties to the armed conflict to engage in DDR; and \n A minimum guarantee of security.", "newParagraph": "module explains shift introduced iddrs 210 un approach ddr concerning reintegration support excombatants person formerly associated armed force group reintegration support long presented component postconflict ddr programme ie ddr programme supported following precondition place n signing negotiated ceasefire andor peace agreement provides framework ddr n trust peace process n willingness party armed conflict engage ddr n minimum guarantee security", "ProcessedSent": "reintegration support long presented component postconflict ddr programme ie ddr programme supported following precondition place n signing negotiated ceasefire andor peace agreement provides framework ddr n trust peace process n willingness party armed conflict engage ddr n minimum guarantee security", "SentID": 2020 @@ -36415,7 +36415,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 663, - "Paragraph": "The objectives of this module are to: \\n Explain the implications of the UN\u2019s sustaining peace approach for reintegration support. \\n Provide policy guidance on how to address reintegration challenges and realize reintegration opportunities across the peace continuum. \\n Consider the general issues concerning reintegration support in contexts where the preconditions for DDR programmes are not in place.", + "Paragraph": "The objectives of this module are to: \n Explain the implications of the UN\u2019s sustaining peace approach for reintegration support. \n Provide policy guidance on how to address reintegration challenges and realize reintegration opportunities across the peace continuum. \n Consider the general issues concerning reintegration support in contexts where the preconditions for DDR programmes are not in place.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -36426,14 +36426,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The objectives of this module are to: \\n Explain the implications of the UN\u2019s sustaining peace approach for reintegration support.", + "Sentence": "The objectives of this module are to: \n Explain the implications of the UN\u2019s sustaining peace approach for reintegration support.", "newParagraph": "objective module n explain implication un sustaining peace approach reintegration support n provide policy guidance address reintegration challenge realize reintegration opportunity across peace continuum n consider general issue concerning reintegration support context precondition ddr programme place", "ProcessedSent": "objective module n explain implication un sustaining peace approach reintegration support", "SentID": 2023 }, { "ParagraphID": 663, - "Paragraph": "The objectives of this module are to: \\n Explain the implications of the UN\u2019s sustaining peace approach for reintegration support. \\n Provide policy guidance on how to address reintegration challenges and realize reintegration opportunities across the peace continuum. \\n Consider the general issues concerning reintegration support in contexts where the preconditions for DDR programmes are not in place.", + "Paragraph": "The objectives of this module are to: \n Explain the implications of the UN\u2019s sustaining peace approach for reintegration support. \n Provide policy guidance on how to address reintegration challenges and realize reintegration opportunities across the peace continuum. \n Consider the general issues concerning reintegration support in contexts where the preconditions for DDR programmes are not in place.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -36444,14 +36444,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Provide policy guidance on how to address reintegration challenges and realize reintegration opportunities across the peace continuum.", + "Sentence": "\n Provide policy guidance on how to address reintegration challenges and realize reintegration opportunities across the peace continuum.", "newParagraph": "objective module n explain implication un sustaining peace approach reintegration support n provide policy guidance address reintegration challenge realize reintegration opportunity across peace continuum n consider general issue concerning reintegration support context precondition ddr programme place", "ProcessedSent": "n provide policy guidance address reintegration challenge realize reintegration opportunity across peace continuum", "SentID": 2024 }, { "ParagraphID": 663, - "Paragraph": "The objectives of this module are to: \\n Explain the implications of the UN\u2019s sustaining peace approach for reintegration support. \\n Provide policy guidance on how to address reintegration challenges and realize reintegration opportunities across the peace continuum. \\n Consider the general issues concerning reintegration support in contexts where the preconditions for DDR programmes are not in place.", + "Paragraph": "The objectives of this module are to: \n Explain the implications of the UN\u2019s sustaining peace approach for reintegration support. \n Provide policy guidance on how to address reintegration challenges and realize reintegration opportunities across the peace continuum. \n Consider the general issues concerning reintegration support in contexts where the preconditions for DDR programmes are not in place.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -36462,7 +36462,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Consider the general issues concerning reintegration support in contexts where the preconditions for DDR programmes are not in place.", + "Sentence": "\n Consider the general issues concerning reintegration support in contexts where the preconditions for DDR programmes are not in place.", "newParagraph": "objective module n explain implication un sustaining peace approach reintegration support n provide policy guidance address reintegration challenge realize reintegration opportunity across peace continuum n consider general issue concerning reintegration support context precondition ddr programme place", "ProcessedSent": "n consider general issue concerning reintegration support context precondition ddr programme place", "SentID": 2025 @@ -36559,7 +36559,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 666, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a)\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b)\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c)\u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d)\u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and \\n e)\u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a)\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b)\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c)\u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d)\u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and \n e)\u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -36577,7 +36577,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 666, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a)\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b)\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c)\u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d)\u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and \\n e)\u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a)\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b)\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c)\u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d)\u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and \n e)\u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -36588,14 +36588,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a)\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b)\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c)\u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d)\u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and \\n e)\u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a)\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b)\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c)\u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d)\u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and \n e)\u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "newParagraph": "iddrs word shall may must used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "ProcessedSent": "use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "SentID": 2032 }, { "ParagraphID": 667, - "Paragraph": "Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open time frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.\\nRecognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 note on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations (A\/C.5\/59\/31), the third report of the Secretary-General on DDR (A\/65\/741), issued in 2011, includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration\u2026is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes\u201d, including psychosocial and psychological support, clinical mental health care and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/transitional justice and participation in political processes. Additionally, the report emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature\u2026the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the individual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open time frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.\nRecognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 note on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations (A\/C.5\/59\/31), the third report of the Secretary-General on DDR (A\/65\/741), issued in 2011, includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration\u2026is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes\u201d, including psychosocial and psychological support, clinical mental health care and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/transitional justice and participation in political processes. Additionally, the report emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature\u2026the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the individual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -36613,7 +36613,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 667, - "Paragraph": "Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open time frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.\\nRecognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 note on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations (A\/C.5\/59\/31), the third report of the Secretary-General on DDR (A\/65\/741), issued in 2011, includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration\u2026is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes\u201d, including psychosocial and psychological support, clinical mental health care and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/transitional justice and participation in political processes. Additionally, the report emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature\u2026the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the individual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open time frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.\nRecognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 note on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations (A\/C.5\/59\/31), the third report of the Secretary-General on DDR (A\/65\/741), issued in 2011, includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration\u2026is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes\u201d, including psychosocial and psychological support, clinical mental health care and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/transitional justice and participation in political processes. Additionally, the report emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature\u2026the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the individual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -36631,7 +36631,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 667, - "Paragraph": "Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open time frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.\\nRecognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 note on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations (A\/C.5\/59\/31), the third report of the Secretary-General on DDR (A\/65\/741), issued in 2011, includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration\u2026is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes\u201d, including psychosocial and psychological support, clinical mental health care and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/transitional justice and participation in political processes. Additionally, the report emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature\u2026the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the individual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open time frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.\nRecognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 note on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations (A\/C.5\/59\/31), the third report of the Secretary-General on DDR (A\/65\/741), issued in 2011, includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration\u2026is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes\u201d, including psychosocial and psychological support, clinical mental health care and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/transitional justice and participation in political processes. Additionally, the report emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature\u2026the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the individual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -36642,14 +36642,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.\\nRecognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 note on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations (A\/C.5\/59\/31), the third report of the Secretary-General on DDR (A\/65\/741), issued in 2011, includes revised policy and guidance.", + "Sentence": "It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.\nRecognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 note on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations (A\/C.5\/59\/31), the third report of the Secretary-General on DDR (A\/65\/741), issued in 2011, includes revised policy and guidance.", "newParagraph": "reintegration process excombatants acquire civilian status gain sustainable employment income reintegration essentially social economic process open time frame primarily taking place community local level part general development country national responsibility often necessitates longterm external assistancenrecognizing new development reintegration excombatants associated group since release 2005 note administrative budgetary aspect financing un peacekeeping operation ac55931 third report secretarygeneral ddr a65741 issued 2011 includes revised policy guidance observes country economic aspect central sufficient sustainable reintegration excombatants serious consideration social political aspect reintegration also crucial sustainability success reintegration programme including psychosocial psychological support clinical mental health care medical health support well reconciliation access justicetransitional justice participation political process additionally report emphasizes reintegration programme supported united nation timebound nature reintegration excombatants associated group longterm process take place individual community national regional level dependent upon wider recovery development ", "ProcessedSent": "part general development country national responsibility often necessitates longterm external assistancenrecognizing new development reintegration excombatants associated group since release 2005 note administrative budgetary aspect financing un peacekeeping operation ac55931 third report secretarygeneral ddr a65741 issued 2011 includes revised policy guidance", "SentID": 2035 }, { "ParagraphID": 667, - "Paragraph": "Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open time frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.\\nRecognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 note on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations (A\/C.5\/59\/31), the third report of the Secretary-General on DDR (A\/65\/741), issued in 2011, includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration\u2026is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes\u201d, including psychosocial and psychological support, clinical mental health care and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/transitional justice and participation in political processes. Additionally, the report emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature\u2026the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the individual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open time frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.\nRecognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 note on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations (A\/C.5\/59\/31), the third report of the Secretary-General on DDR (A\/65\/741), issued in 2011, includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration\u2026is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes\u201d, including psychosocial and psychological support, clinical mental health care and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/transitional justice and participation in political processes. Additionally, the report emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature\u2026the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the individual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -36667,7 +36667,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 667, - "Paragraph": "Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open time frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.\\nRecognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 note on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations (A\/C.5\/59\/31), the third report of the Secretary-General on DDR (A\/65\/741), issued in 2011, includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration\u2026is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes\u201d, including psychosocial and psychological support, clinical mental health care and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/transitional justice and participation in political processes. Additionally, the report emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature\u2026the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the individual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open time frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.\nRecognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 note on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations (A\/C.5\/59\/31), the third report of the Secretary-General on DDR (A\/65\/741), issued in 2011, includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration\u2026is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes\u201d, including psychosocial and psychological support, clinical mental health care and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/transitional justice and participation in political processes. Additionally, the report emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature\u2026the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the individual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -36685,7 +36685,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 667, - "Paragraph": "Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open time frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.\\nRecognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 note on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations (A\/C.5\/59\/31), the third report of the Secretary-General on DDR (A\/65\/741), issued in 2011, includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration\u2026is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes\u201d, including psychosocial and psychological support, clinical mental health care and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/transitional justice and participation in political processes. Additionally, the report emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature\u2026the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the individual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open time frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.\nRecognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 note on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations (A\/C.5\/59\/31), the third report of the Secretary-General on DDR (A\/65\/741), issued in 2011, includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration\u2026is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes\u201d, including psychosocial and psychological support, clinical mental health care and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/transitional justice and participation in political processes. Additionally, the report emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature\u2026the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the individual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -37081,7 +37081,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 675, - "Paragraph": "Children who were recruited by armed groups may have experienced significant harm and have specific needs. Furthermore, children who joined or supported armed forces or groups may have done so under duress, coercion or manipulation. For many children and youth who have been associated with armed forces or groups, the focus should be on reintegration and highlighting their self-worth and their ability to contribute to society, as well as offering alternatives to participation in armed groups in the form of training and education. At the same time, opportunities should be provided to other children and youth in the area, so as not to create tension or stigma. The following principles regarding reintegration support to children and youth apply: \\n Children shall be treated as children and, if they have been associated with armed forces or groups, as survivors of violations of their rights. They shall always be referred to as children. \\n In any decision that affects children, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration. International legal standards pertaining to children shall be applied. \\n States shall engage children\u2019s families to support rehabilitation and reintegration.", + "Paragraph": "Children who were recruited by armed groups may have experienced significant harm and have specific needs. Furthermore, children who joined or supported armed forces or groups may have done so under duress, coercion or manipulation. For many children and youth who have been associated with armed forces or groups, the focus should be on reintegration and highlighting their self-worth and their ability to contribute to society, as well as offering alternatives to participation in armed groups in the form of training and education. At the same time, opportunities should be provided to other children and youth in the area, so as not to create tension or stigma. The following principles regarding reintegration support to children and youth apply: \n Children shall be treated as children and, if they have been associated with armed forces or groups, as survivors of violations of their rights. They shall always be referred to as children. \n In any decision that affects children, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration. International legal standards pertaining to children shall be applied. \n States shall engage children\u2019s families to support rehabilitation and reintegration.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -37099,7 +37099,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 675, - "Paragraph": "Children who were recruited by armed groups may have experienced significant harm and have specific needs. Furthermore, children who joined or supported armed forces or groups may have done so under duress, coercion or manipulation. For many children and youth who have been associated with armed forces or groups, the focus should be on reintegration and highlighting their self-worth and their ability to contribute to society, as well as offering alternatives to participation in armed groups in the form of training and education. At the same time, opportunities should be provided to other children and youth in the area, so as not to create tension or stigma. The following principles regarding reintegration support to children and youth apply: \\n Children shall be treated as children and, if they have been associated with armed forces or groups, as survivors of violations of their rights. They shall always be referred to as children. \\n In any decision that affects children, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration. International legal standards pertaining to children shall be applied. \\n States shall engage children\u2019s families to support rehabilitation and reintegration.", + "Paragraph": "Children who were recruited by armed groups may have experienced significant harm and have specific needs. Furthermore, children who joined or supported armed forces or groups may have done so under duress, coercion or manipulation. For many children and youth who have been associated with armed forces or groups, the focus should be on reintegration and highlighting their self-worth and their ability to contribute to society, as well as offering alternatives to participation in armed groups in the form of training and education. At the same time, opportunities should be provided to other children and youth in the area, so as not to create tension or stigma. The following principles regarding reintegration support to children and youth apply: \n Children shall be treated as children and, if they have been associated with armed forces or groups, as survivors of violations of their rights. They shall always be referred to as children. \n In any decision that affects children, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration. International legal standards pertaining to children shall be applied. \n States shall engage children\u2019s families to support rehabilitation and reintegration.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -37117,7 +37117,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 675, - "Paragraph": "Children who were recruited by armed groups may have experienced significant harm and have specific needs. Furthermore, children who joined or supported armed forces or groups may have done so under duress, coercion or manipulation. For many children and youth who have been associated with armed forces or groups, the focus should be on reintegration and highlighting their self-worth and their ability to contribute to society, as well as offering alternatives to participation in armed groups in the form of training and education. At the same time, opportunities should be provided to other children and youth in the area, so as not to create tension or stigma. The following principles regarding reintegration support to children and youth apply: \\n Children shall be treated as children and, if they have been associated with armed forces or groups, as survivors of violations of their rights. They shall always be referred to as children. \\n In any decision that affects children, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration. International legal standards pertaining to children shall be applied. \\n States shall engage children\u2019s families to support rehabilitation and reintegration.", + "Paragraph": "Children who were recruited by armed groups may have experienced significant harm and have specific needs. Furthermore, children who joined or supported armed forces or groups may have done so under duress, coercion or manipulation. For many children and youth who have been associated with armed forces or groups, the focus should be on reintegration and highlighting their self-worth and their ability to contribute to society, as well as offering alternatives to participation in armed groups in the form of training and education. At the same time, opportunities should be provided to other children and youth in the area, so as not to create tension or stigma. The following principles regarding reintegration support to children and youth apply: \n Children shall be treated as children and, if they have been associated with armed forces or groups, as survivors of violations of their rights. They shall always be referred to as children. \n In any decision that affects children, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration. International legal standards pertaining to children shall be applied. \n States shall engage children\u2019s families to support rehabilitation and reintegration.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -37135,7 +37135,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 675, - "Paragraph": "Children who were recruited by armed groups may have experienced significant harm and have specific needs. Furthermore, children who joined or supported armed forces or groups may have done so under duress, coercion or manipulation. For many children and youth who have been associated with armed forces or groups, the focus should be on reintegration and highlighting their self-worth and their ability to contribute to society, as well as offering alternatives to participation in armed groups in the form of training and education. At the same time, opportunities should be provided to other children and youth in the area, so as not to create tension or stigma. The following principles regarding reintegration support to children and youth apply: \\n Children shall be treated as children and, if they have been associated with armed forces or groups, as survivors of violations of their rights. They shall always be referred to as children. \\n In any decision that affects children, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration. International legal standards pertaining to children shall be applied. \\n States shall engage children\u2019s families to support rehabilitation and reintegration.", + "Paragraph": "Children who were recruited by armed groups may have experienced significant harm and have specific needs. Furthermore, children who joined or supported armed forces or groups may have done so under duress, coercion or manipulation. For many children and youth who have been associated with armed forces or groups, the focus should be on reintegration and highlighting their self-worth and their ability to contribute to society, as well as offering alternatives to participation in armed groups in the form of training and education. At the same time, opportunities should be provided to other children and youth in the area, so as not to create tension or stigma. The following principles regarding reintegration support to children and youth apply: \n Children shall be treated as children and, if they have been associated with armed forces or groups, as survivors of violations of their rights. They shall always be referred to as children. \n In any decision that affects children, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration. International legal standards pertaining to children shall be applied. \n States shall engage children\u2019s families to support rehabilitation and reintegration.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -37153,7 +37153,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 675, - "Paragraph": "Children who were recruited by armed groups may have experienced significant harm and have specific needs. Furthermore, children who joined or supported armed forces or groups may have done so under duress, coercion or manipulation. For many children and youth who have been associated with armed forces or groups, the focus should be on reintegration and highlighting their self-worth and their ability to contribute to society, as well as offering alternatives to participation in armed groups in the form of training and education. At the same time, opportunities should be provided to other children and youth in the area, so as not to create tension or stigma. The following principles regarding reintegration support to children and youth apply: \\n Children shall be treated as children and, if they have been associated with armed forces or groups, as survivors of violations of their rights. They shall always be referred to as children. \\n In any decision that affects children, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration. International legal standards pertaining to children shall be applied. \\n States shall engage children\u2019s families to support rehabilitation and reintegration.", + "Paragraph": "Children who were recruited by armed groups may have experienced significant harm and have specific needs. Furthermore, children who joined or supported armed forces or groups may have done so under duress, coercion or manipulation. For many children and youth who have been associated with armed forces or groups, the focus should be on reintegration and highlighting their self-worth and their ability to contribute to society, as well as offering alternatives to participation in armed groups in the form of training and education. At the same time, opportunities should be provided to other children and youth in the area, so as not to create tension or stigma. The following principles regarding reintegration support to children and youth apply: \n Children shall be treated as children and, if they have been associated with armed forces or groups, as survivors of violations of their rights. They shall always be referred to as children. \n In any decision that affects children, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration. International legal standards pertaining to children shall be applied. \n States shall engage children\u2019s families to support rehabilitation and reintegration.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -37164,14 +37164,14 @@ "Heading2": "3.2.2 Unconditional release and protection of children", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The following principles regarding reintegration support to children and youth apply: \\n Children shall be treated as children and, if they have been associated with armed forces or groups, as survivors of violations of their rights.", + "Sentence": "The following principles regarding reintegration support to children and youth apply: \n Children shall be treated as children and, if they have been associated with armed forces or groups, as survivors of violations of their rights.", "newParagraph": "child recruited armed group may experienced significant harm specific need furthermore child joined supported armed force group may done duress coercion manipulation many child youth associated armed force group focus reintegration highlighting selfworth ability contribute society well offering alternative participation armed group form training education time opportunity provided child youth area create tension stigma following principle regarding reintegration support child youth apply n child shall treated child associated armed force group survivor violation right shall always referred child n decision affect child best interest child shall primary consideration international legal standard pertaining child shall applied n state shall engage child family support rehabilitation reintegration", "ProcessedSent": "following principle regarding reintegration support child youth apply n child shall treated child associated armed force group survivor violation right", "SentID": 2064 }, { "ParagraphID": 675, - "Paragraph": "Children who were recruited by armed groups may have experienced significant harm and have specific needs. Furthermore, children who joined or supported armed forces or groups may have done so under duress, coercion or manipulation. For many children and youth who have been associated with armed forces or groups, the focus should be on reintegration and highlighting their self-worth and their ability to contribute to society, as well as offering alternatives to participation in armed groups in the form of training and education. At the same time, opportunities should be provided to other children and youth in the area, so as not to create tension or stigma. The following principles regarding reintegration support to children and youth apply: \\n Children shall be treated as children and, if they have been associated with armed forces or groups, as survivors of violations of their rights. They shall always be referred to as children. \\n In any decision that affects children, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration. International legal standards pertaining to children shall be applied. \\n States shall engage children\u2019s families to support rehabilitation and reintegration.", + "Paragraph": "Children who were recruited by armed groups may have experienced significant harm and have specific needs. Furthermore, children who joined or supported armed forces or groups may have done so under duress, coercion or manipulation. For many children and youth who have been associated with armed forces or groups, the focus should be on reintegration and highlighting their self-worth and their ability to contribute to society, as well as offering alternatives to participation in armed groups in the form of training and education. At the same time, opportunities should be provided to other children and youth in the area, so as not to create tension or stigma. The following principles regarding reintegration support to children and youth apply: \n Children shall be treated as children and, if they have been associated with armed forces or groups, as survivors of violations of their rights. They shall always be referred to as children. \n In any decision that affects children, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration. International legal standards pertaining to children shall be applied. \n States shall engage children\u2019s families to support rehabilitation and reintegration.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -37189,7 +37189,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 675, - "Paragraph": "Children who were recruited by armed groups may have experienced significant harm and have specific needs. Furthermore, children who joined or supported armed forces or groups may have done so under duress, coercion or manipulation. For many children and youth who have been associated with armed forces or groups, the focus should be on reintegration and highlighting their self-worth and their ability to contribute to society, as well as offering alternatives to participation in armed groups in the form of training and education. At the same time, opportunities should be provided to other children and youth in the area, so as not to create tension or stigma. The following principles regarding reintegration support to children and youth apply: \\n Children shall be treated as children and, if they have been associated with armed forces or groups, as survivors of violations of their rights. They shall always be referred to as children. \\n In any decision that affects children, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration. International legal standards pertaining to children shall be applied. \\n States shall engage children\u2019s families to support rehabilitation and reintegration.", + "Paragraph": "Children who were recruited by armed groups may have experienced significant harm and have specific needs. Furthermore, children who joined or supported armed forces or groups may have done so under duress, coercion or manipulation. For many children and youth who have been associated with armed forces or groups, the focus should be on reintegration and highlighting their self-worth and their ability to contribute to society, as well as offering alternatives to participation in armed groups in the form of training and education. At the same time, opportunities should be provided to other children and youth in the area, so as not to create tension or stigma. The following principles regarding reintegration support to children and youth apply: \n Children shall be treated as children and, if they have been associated with armed forces or groups, as survivors of violations of their rights. They shall always be referred to as children. \n In any decision that affects children, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration. International legal standards pertaining to children shall be applied. \n States shall engage children\u2019s families to support rehabilitation and reintegration.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -37200,14 +37200,14 @@ "Heading2": "3.2.2 Unconditional release and protection of children", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n In any decision that affects children, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration.", + "Sentence": "\n In any decision that affects children, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration.", "newParagraph": "child recruited armed group may experienced significant harm specific need furthermore child joined supported armed force group may done duress coercion manipulation many child youth associated armed force group focus reintegration highlighting selfworth ability contribute society well offering alternative participation armed group form training education time opportunity provided child youth area create tension stigma following principle regarding reintegration support child youth apply n child shall treated child associated armed force group survivor violation right shall always referred child n decision affect child best interest child shall primary consideration international legal standard pertaining child shall applied n state shall engage child family support rehabilitation reintegration", "ProcessedSent": "n decision affect child best interest child shall primary consideration", "SentID": 2066 }, { "ParagraphID": 675, - "Paragraph": "Children who were recruited by armed groups may have experienced significant harm and have specific needs. Furthermore, children who joined or supported armed forces or groups may have done so under duress, coercion or manipulation. For many children and youth who have been associated with armed forces or groups, the focus should be on reintegration and highlighting their self-worth and their ability to contribute to society, as well as offering alternatives to participation in armed groups in the form of training and education. At the same time, opportunities should be provided to other children and youth in the area, so as not to create tension or stigma. The following principles regarding reintegration support to children and youth apply: \\n Children shall be treated as children and, if they have been associated with armed forces or groups, as survivors of violations of their rights. They shall always be referred to as children. \\n In any decision that affects children, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration. International legal standards pertaining to children shall be applied. \\n States shall engage children\u2019s families to support rehabilitation and reintegration.", + "Paragraph": "Children who were recruited by armed groups may have experienced significant harm and have specific needs. Furthermore, children who joined or supported armed forces or groups may have done so under duress, coercion or manipulation. For many children and youth who have been associated with armed forces or groups, the focus should be on reintegration and highlighting their self-worth and their ability to contribute to society, as well as offering alternatives to participation in armed groups in the form of training and education. At the same time, opportunities should be provided to other children and youth in the area, so as not to create tension or stigma. The following principles regarding reintegration support to children and youth apply: \n Children shall be treated as children and, if they have been associated with armed forces or groups, as survivors of violations of their rights. They shall always be referred to as children. \n In any decision that affects children, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration. International legal standards pertaining to children shall be applied. \n States shall engage children\u2019s families to support rehabilitation and reintegration.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -37225,7 +37225,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 675, - "Paragraph": "Children who were recruited by armed groups may have experienced significant harm and have specific needs. Furthermore, children who joined or supported armed forces or groups may have done so under duress, coercion or manipulation. For many children and youth who have been associated with armed forces or groups, the focus should be on reintegration and highlighting their self-worth and their ability to contribute to society, as well as offering alternatives to participation in armed groups in the form of training and education. At the same time, opportunities should be provided to other children and youth in the area, so as not to create tension or stigma. The following principles regarding reintegration support to children and youth apply: \\n Children shall be treated as children and, if they have been associated with armed forces or groups, as survivors of violations of their rights. They shall always be referred to as children. \\n In any decision that affects children, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration. International legal standards pertaining to children shall be applied. \\n States shall engage children\u2019s families to support rehabilitation and reintegration.", + "Paragraph": "Children who were recruited by armed groups may have experienced significant harm and have specific needs. Furthermore, children who joined or supported armed forces or groups may have done so under duress, coercion or manipulation. For many children and youth who have been associated with armed forces or groups, the focus should be on reintegration and highlighting their self-worth and their ability to contribute to society, as well as offering alternatives to participation in armed groups in the form of training and education. At the same time, opportunities should be provided to other children and youth in the area, so as not to create tension or stigma. The following principles regarding reintegration support to children and youth apply: \n Children shall be treated as children and, if they have been associated with armed forces or groups, as survivors of violations of their rights. They shall always be referred to as children. \n In any decision that affects children, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration. International legal standards pertaining to children shall be applied. \n States shall engage children\u2019s families to support rehabilitation and reintegration.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -37236,7 +37236,7 @@ "Heading2": "3.2.2 Unconditional release and protection of children", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n States shall engage children\u2019s families to support rehabilitation and reintegration.", + "Sentence": "\n States shall engage children\u2019s families to support rehabilitation and reintegration.", "newParagraph": "child recruited armed group may experienced significant harm specific need furthermore child joined supported armed force group may done duress coercion manipulation many child youth associated armed force group focus reintegration highlighting selfworth ability contribute society well offering alternative participation armed group form training education time opportunity provided child youth area create tension stigma following principle regarding reintegration support child youth apply n child shall treated child associated armed force group survivor violation right shall always referred child n decision affect child best interest child shall primary consideration international legal standard pertaining child shall applied n state shall engage child family support rehabilitation reintegration", "ProcessedSent": "n state shall engage child family support rehabilitation reintegration", "SentID": 2068 @@ -37585,7 +37585,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 682, - "Paragraph": "A conflict-sensitive approach involves ensuring a sound understanding of the two-way interaction between activities and context, and acting to minimize the negative impacts and maximize the positive impacts of intervention on conflict, within an organization\u2019s given mandate. The first principle that is usually applied in a conflict-sensitive approach is do no harm; however, conflict sensitivity goes beyond this. To do no harm and to support local capacities for peace requires: \\n An awareness of both the intended and unintended consequences of reintegration programming; \\n Analysis of the conflict context and the programme, examining how reintegration support interacts with the conflict; \\n A willingness to adapt, create options and, if needed, redesign programmes to improve quality; \\n Careful reflection on staff conduct and organizational policies, to ensure that the behaviour of individuals and organizations meets the highest standards of ethics and professionalism.", + "Paragraph": "A conflict-sensitive approach involves ensuring a sound understanding of the two-way interaction between activities and context, and acting to minimize the negative impacts and maximize the positive impacts of intervention on conflict, within an organization\u2019s given mandate. The first principle that is usually applied in a conflict-sensitive approach is do no harm; however, conflict sensitivity goes beyond this. To do no harm and to support local capacities for peace requires: \n An awareness of both the intended and unintended consequences of reintegration programming; \n Analysis of the conflict context and the programme, examining how reintegration support interacts with the conflict; \n A willingness to adapt, create options and, if needed, redesign programmes to improve quality; \n Careful reflection on staff conduct and organizational policies, to ensure that the behaviour of individuals and organizations meets the highest standards of ethics and professionalism.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -37603,7 +37603,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 682, - "Paragraph": "A conflict-sensitive approach involves ensuring a sound understanding of the two-way interaction between activities and context, and acting to minimize the negative impacts and maximize the positive impacts of intervention on conflict, within an organization\u2019s given mandate. The first principle that is usually applied in a conflict-sensitive approach is do no harm; however, conflict sensitivity goes beyond this. To do no harm and to support local capacities for peace requires: \\n An awareness of both the intended and unintended consequences of reintegration programming; \\n Analysis of the conflict context and the programme, examining how reintegration support interacts with the conflict; \\n A willingness to adapt, create options and, if needed, redesign programmes to improve quality; \\n Careful reflection on staff conduct and organizational policies, to ensure that the behaviour of individuals and organizations meets the highest standards of ethics and professionalism.", + "Paragraph": "A conflict-sensitive approach involves ensuring a sound understanding of the two-way interaction between activities and context, and acting to minimize the negative impacts and maximize the positive impacts of intervention on conflict, within an organization\u2019s given mandate. The first principle that is usually applied in a conflict-sensitive approach is do no harm; however, conflict sensitivity goes beyond this. To do no harm and to support local capacities for peace requires: \n An awareness of both the intended and unintended consequences of reintegration programming; \n Analysis of the conflict context and the programme, examining how reintegration support interacts with the conflict; \n A willingness to adapt, create options and, if needed, redesign programmes to improve quality; \n Careful reflection on staff conduct and organizational policies, to ensure that the behaviour of individuals and organizations meets the highest standards of ethics and professionalism.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -37621,7 +37621,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 682, - "Paragraph": "A conflict-sensitive approach involves ensuring a sound understanding of the two-way interaction between activities and context, and acting to minimize the negative impacts and maximize the positive impacts of intervention on conflict, within an organization\u2019s given mandate. The first principle that is usually applied in a conflict-sensitive approach is do no harm; however, conflict sensitivity goes beyond this. To do no harm and to support local capacities for peace requires: \\n An awareness of both the intended and unintended consequences of reintegration programming; \\n Analysis of the conflict context and the programme, examining how reintegration support interacts with the conflict; \\n A willingness to adapt, create options and, if needed, redesign programmes to improve quality; \\n Careful reflection on staff conduct and organizational policies, to ensure that the behaviour of individuals and organizations meets the highest standards of ethics and professionalism.", + "Paragraph": "A conflict-sensitive approach involves ensuring a sound understanding of the two-way interaction between activities and context, and acting to minimize the negative impacts and maximize the positive impacts of intervention on conflict, within an organization\u2019s given mandate. The first principle that is usually applied in a conflict-sensitive approach is do no harm; however, conflict sensitivity goes beyond this. To do no harm and to support local capacities for peace requires: \n An awareness of both the intended and unintended consequences of reintegration programming; \n Analysis of the conflict context and the programme, examining how reintegration support interacts with the conflict; \n A willingness to adapt, create options and, if needed, redesign programmes to improve quality; \n Careful reflection on staff conduct and organizational policies, to ensure that the behaviour of individuals and organizations meets the highest standards of ethics and professionalism.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -37632,7 +37632,7 @@ "Heading2": "3.4 Conflict sensitive", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "To do no harm and to support local capacities for peace requires: \\n An awareness of both the intended and unintended consequences of reintegration programming; \\n Analysis of the conflict context and the programme, examining how reintegration support interacts with the conflict; \\n A willingness to adapt, create options and, if needed, redesign programmes to improve quality; \\n Careful reflection on staff conduct and organizational policies, to ensure that the behaviour of individuals and organizations meets the highest standards of ethics and professionalism.", + "Sentence": "To do no harm and to support local capacities for peace requires: \n An awareness of both the intended and unintended consequences of reintegration programming; \n Analysis of the conflict context and the programme, examining how reintegration support interacts with the conflict; \n A willingness to adapt, create options and, if needed, redesign programmes to improve quality; \n Careful reflection on staff conduct and organizational policies, to ensure that the behaviour of individuals and organizations meets the highest standards of ethics and professionalism.", "newParagraph": "conflictsensitive approach involves ensuring sound understanding twoway interaction activity context acting minimize negative impact maximize positive impact intervention conflict within organization given mandate first principle usually applied conflictsensitive approach harm however conflict sensitivity go beyond harm support local capacity peace requires n awareness intended unintended consequence reintegration programming n analysis conflict context programme examining reintegration support interacts conflict n willingness adapt create option needed redesign programme improve quality n careful reflection staff conduct organizational policy ensure behaviour individual organization meet highest standard ethic professionalism", "ProcessedSent": "harm support local capacity peace requires n awareness intended unintended consequence reintegration programming n analysis conflict context programme examining reintegration support interacts conflict n willingness adapt create option needed redesign programme improve quality n careful reflection staff conduct organizational policy ensure behaviour individual organization meet highest standard ethic professionalism", "SentID": 2090 @@ -39187,7 +39187,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 707, - "Paragraph": "In light of the above, reintegration support as part of sustaining peace should focus on: \\n The enhancement of capacities for peace. \\n The adoption of a clear definition of reintegration outcomes within the humanitarian- development-peace nexus, recognizing the strong interconnectedness between and among the three pillars. \\n Efforts to actively break out of institutional silos, eliminating fragmentation and contributing to a comprehensive, coordinated and coherent DDR process. \\n The application of a gender lens to all reintegration support. The rationale is that men and women, boys and girls, have differentiated needs, aspirations, capacities and contributions. \\n The importance of strengthening resilience during reintegration support. Individuals, communities, countries and regions lay the foundations for resilience to stresses and shocks associated with insecure environments through the development of local and national development plans, including national action plans on UN Security Council Resolution 1325. \\n The consistent implementation of monitoring and evaluation across all phases of the peace continuum with a focus on cross-sectoral approaches that emphasize collective programming outcomes. \\n The development of innovative partnerships to achieve reintegration as part of sustaining peace, based on whole-of-government and whole-of-society approaches, involving ex-combatants, persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups and their families, as well as receiving communities. \\n The engagement of the private sector in the creation of economic opportunities, fostering capacities of local small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as involving international private- sector investment in reintegration opportunities, where appropriate.", + "Paragraph": "In light of the above, reintegration support as part of sustaining peace should focus on: \n The enhancement of capacities for peace. \n The adoption of a clear definition of reintegration outcomes within the humanitarian- development-peace nexus, recognizing the strong interconnectedness between and among the three pillars. \n Efforts to actively break out of institutional silos, eliminating fragmentation and contributing to a comprehensive, coordinated and coherent DDR process. \n The application of a gender lens to all reintegration support. The rationale is that men and women, boys and girls, have differentiated needs, aspirations, capacities and contributions. \n The importance of strengthening resilience during reintegration support. Individuals, communities, countries and regions lay the foundations for resilience to stresses and shocks associated with insecure environments through the development of local and national development plans, including national action plans on UN Security Council Resolution 1325. \n The consistent implementation of monitoring and evaluation across all phases of the peace continuum with a focus on cross-sectoral approaches that emphasize collective programming outcomes. \n The development of innovative partnerships to achieve reintegration as part of sustaining peace, based on whole-of-government and whole-of-society approaches, involving ex-combatants, persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups and their families, as well as receiving communities. \n The engagement of the private sector in the creation of economic opportunities, fostering capacities of local small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as involving international private- sector investment in reintegration opportunities, where appropriate.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -39198,14 +39198,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.1 The Sustaining Peace Approach", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "In light of the above, reintegration support as part of sustaining peace should focus on: \\n The enhancement of capacities for peace.", + "Sentence": "In light of the above, reintegration support as part of sustaining peace should focus on: \n The enhancement of capacities for peace.", "newParagraph": "light reintegration support part sustaining peace focus n enhancement capacity peace n adoption clear definition reintegration outcome within humanitarian developmentpeace nexus recognizing strong interconnectedness among three pillar n effort actively break institutional silo eliminating fragmentation contributing comprehensive coordinated coherent ddr process n application gender lens reintegration support rationale men woman boy girl differentiated need aspiration capacity contribution n importance strengthening resilience reintegration support individual community country region lay foundation resilience stress shock associated insecure environment development local national development plan including national action plan un security council resolution 1325 n consistent implementation monitoring evaluation across phase peace continuum focus crosssectoral approach emphasize collective programming outcome n development innovative partnership achieve reintegration part sustaining peace based wholeofgovernment wholeofsociety approach involving excombatants person formerly associated armed force group family well receiving community n engagement private sector creation economic opportunity fostering capacity local small mediumsized enterprise well involving international private sector investment reintegration opportunity appropriate", "ProcessedSent": "light reintegration support part sustaining peace focus n enhancement capacity peace", "SentID": 2177 }, { "ParagraphID": 707, - "Paragraph": "In light of the above, reintegration support as part of sustaining peace should focus on: \\n The enhancement of capacities for peace. \\n The adoption of a clear definition of reintegration outcomes within the humanitarian- development-peace nexus, recognizing the strong interconnectedness between and among the three pillars. \\n Efforts to actively break out of institutional silos, eliminating fragmentation and contributing to a comprehensive, coordinated and coherent DDR process. \\n The application of a gender lens to all reintegration support. The rationale is that men and women, boys and girls, have differentiated needs, aspirations, capacities and contributions. \\n The importance of strengthening resilience during reintegration support. Individuals, communities, countries and regions lay the foundations for resilience to stresses and shocks associated with insecure environments through the development of local and national development plans, including national action plans on UN Security Council Resolution 1325. \\n The consistent implementation of monitoring and evaluation across all phases of the peace continuum with a focus on cross-sectoral approaches that emphasize collective programming outcomes. \\n The development of innovative partnerships to achieve reintegration as part of sustaining peace, based on whole-of-government and whole-of-society approaches, involving ex-combatants, persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups and their families, as well as receiving communities. \\n The engagement of the private sector in the creation of economic opportunities, fostering capacities of local small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as involving international private- sector investment in reintegration opportunities, where appropriate.", + "Paragraph": "In light of the above, reintegration support as part of sustaining peace should focus on: \n The enhancement of capacities for peace. \n The adoption of a clear definition of reintegration outcomes within the humanitarian- development-peace nexus, recognizing the strong interconnectedness between and among the three pillars. \n Efforts to actively break out of institutional silos, eliminating fragmentation and contributing to a comprehensive, coordinated and coherent DDR process. \n The application of a gender lens to all reintegration support. The rationale is that men and women, boys and girls, have differentiated needs, aspirations, capacities and contributions. \n The importance of strengthening resilience during reintegration support. Individuals, communities, countries and regions lay the foundations for resilience to stresses and shocks associated with insecure environments through the development of local and national development plans, including national action plans on UN Security Council Resolution 1325. \n The consistent implementation of monitoring and evaluation across all phases of the peace continuum with a focus on cross-sectoral approaches that emphasize collective programming outcomes. \n The development of innovative partnerships to achieve reintegration as part of sustaining peace, based on whole-of-government and whole-of-society approaches, involving ex-combatants, persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups and their families, as well as receiving communities. \n The engagement of the private sector in the creation of economic opportunities, fostering capacities of local small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as involving international private- sector investment in reintegration opportunities, where appropriate.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -39216,14 +39216,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.1 The Sustaining Peace Approach", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The adoption of a clear definition of reintegration outcomes within the humanitarian- development-peace nexus, recognizing the strong interconnectedness between and among the three pillars.", + "Sentence": "\n The adoption of a clear definition of reintegration outcomes within the humanitarian- development-peace nexus, recognizing the strong interconnectedness between and among the three pillars.", "newParagraph": "light reintegration support part sustaining peace focus n enhancement capacity peace n adoption clear definition reintegration outcome within humanitarian developmentpeace nexus recognizing strong interconnectedness among three pillar n effort actively break institutional silo eliminating fragmentation contributing comprehensive coordinated coherent ddr process n application gender lens reintegration support rationale men woman boy girl differentiated need aspiration capacity contribution n importance strengthening resilience reintegration support individual community country region lay foundation resilience stress shock associated insecure environment development local national development plan including national action plan un security council resolution 1325 n consistent implementation monitoring evaluation across phase peace continuum focus crosssectoral approach emphasize collective programming outcome n development innovative partnership achieve reintegration part sustaining peace based wholeofgovernment wholeofsociety approach involving excombatants person formerly associated armed force group family well receiving community n engagement private sector creation economic opportunity fostering capacity local small mediumsized enterprise well involving international private sector investment reintegration opportunity appropriate", "ProcessedSent": "n adoption clear definition reintegration outcome within humanitarian developmentpeace nexus recognizing strong interconnectedness among three pillar", "SentID": 2178 }, { "ParagraphID": 707, - "Paragraph": "In light of the above, reintegration support as part of sustaining peace should focus on: \\n The enhancement of capacities for peace. \\n The adoption of a clear definition of reintegration outcomes within the humanitarian- development-peace nexus, recognizing the strong interconnectedness between and among the three pillars. \\n Efforts to actively break out of institutional silos, eliminating fragmentation and contributing to a comprehensive, coordinated and coherent DDR process. \\n The application of a gender lens to all reintegration support. The rationale is that men and women, boys and girls, have differentiated needs, aspirations, capacities and contributions. \\n The importance of strengthening resilience during reintegration support. Individuals, communities, countries and regions lay the foundations for resilience to stresses and shocks associated with insecure environments through the development of local and national development plans, including national action plans on UN Security Council Resolution 1325. \\n The consistent implementation of monitoring and evaluation across all phases of the peace continuum with a focus on cross-sectoral approaches that emphasize collective programming outcomes. \\n The development of innovative partnerships to achieve reintegration as part of sustaining peace, based on whole-of-government and whole-of-society approaches, involving ex-combatants, persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups and their families, as well as receiving communities. \\n The engagement of the private sector in the creation of economic opportunities, fostering capacities of local small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as involving international private- sector investment in reintegration opportunities, where appropriate.", + "Paragraph": "In light of the above, reintegration support as part of sustaining peace should focus on: \n The enhancement of capacities for peace. \n The adoption of a clear definition of reintegration outcomes within the humanitarian- development-peace nexus, recognizing the strong interconnectedness between and among the three pillars. \n Efforts to actively break out of institutional silos, eliminating fragmentation and contributing to a comprehensive, coordinated and coherent DDR process. \n The application of a gender lens to all reintegration support. The rationale is that men and women, boys and girls, have differentiated needs, aspirations, capacities and contributions. \n The importance of strengthening resilience during reintegration support. Individuals, communities, countries and regions lay the foundations for resilience to stresses and shocks associated with insecure environments through the development of local and national development plans, including national action plans on UN Security Council Resolution 1325. \n The consistent implementation of monitoring and evaluation across all phases of the peace continuum with a focus on cross-sectoral approaches that emphasize collective programming outcomes. \n The development of innovative partnerships to achieve reintegration as part of sustaining peace, based on whole-of-government and whole-of-society approaches, involving ex-combatants, persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups and their families, as well as receiving communities. \n The engagement of the private sector in the creation of economic opportunities, fostering capacities of local small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as involving international private- sector investment in reintegration opportunities, where appropriate.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -39234,14 +39234,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.1 The Sustaining Peace Approach", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Efforts to actively break out of institutional silos, eliminating fragmentation and contributing to a comprehensive, coordinated and coherent DDR process.", + "Sentence": "\n Efforts to actively break out of institutional silos, eliminating fragmentation and contributing to a comprehensive, coordinated and coherent DDR process.", "newParagraph": "light reintegration support part sustaining peace focus n enhancement capacity peace n adoption clear definition reintegration outcome within humanitarian developmentpeace nexus recognizing strong interconnectedness among three pillar n effort actively break institutional silo eliminating fragmentation contributing comprehensive coordinated coherent ddr process n application gender lens reintegration support rationale men woman boy girl differentiated need aspiration capacity contribution n importance strengthening resilience reintegration support individual community country region lay foundation resilience stress shock associated insecure environment development local national development plan including national action plan un security council resolution 1325 n consistent implementation monitoring evaluation across phase peace continuum focus crosssectoral approach emphasize collective programming outcome n development innovative partnership achieve reintegration part sustaining peace based wholeofgovernment wholeofsociety approach involving excombatants person formerly associated armed force group family well receiving community n engagement private sector creation economic opportunity fostering capacity local small mediumsized enterprise well involving international private sector investment reintegration opportunity appropriate", "ProcessedSent": "n effort actively break institutional silo eliminating fragmentation contributing comprehensive coordinated coherent ddr process", "SentID": 2179 }, { "ParagraphID": 707, - "Paragraph": "In light of the above, reintegration support as part of sustaining peace should focus on: \\n The enhancement of capacities for peace. \\n The adoption of a clear definition of reintegration outcomes within the humanitarian- development-peace nexus, recognizing the strong interconnectedness between and among the three pillars. \\n Efforts to actively break out of institutional silos, eliminating fragmentation and contributing to a comprehensive, coordinated and coherent DDR process. \\n The application of a gender lens to all reintegration support. The rationale is that men and women, boys and girls, have differentiated needs, aspirations, capacities and contributions. \\n The importance of strengthening resilience during reintegration support. Individuals, communities, countries and regions lay the foundations for resilience to stresses and shocks associated with insecure environments through the development of local and national development plans, including national action plans on UN Security Council Resolution 1325. \\n The consistent implementation of monitoring and evaluation across all phases of the peace continuum with a focus on cross-sectoral approaches that emphasize collective programming outcomes. \\n The development of innovative partnerships to achieve reintegration as part of sustaining peace, based on whole-of-government and whole-of-society approaches, involving ex-combatants, persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups and their families, as well as receiving communities. \\n The engagement of the private sector in the creation of economic opportunities, fostering capacities of local small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as involving international private- sector investment in reintegration opportunities, where appropriate.", + "Paragraph": "In light of the above, reintegration support as part of sustaining peace should focus on: \n The enhancement of capacities for peace. \n The adoption of a clear definition of reintegration outcomes within the humanitarian- development-peace nexus, recognizing the strong interconnectedness between and among the three pillars. \n Efforts to actively break out of institutional silos, eliminating fragmentation and contributing to a comprehensive, coordinated and coherent DDR process. \n The application of a gender lens to all reintegration support. The rationale is that men and women, boys and girls, have differentiated needs, aspirations, capacities and contributions. \n The importance of strengthening resilience during reintegration support. Individuals, communities, countries and regions lay the foundations for resilience to stresses and shocks associated with insecure environments through the development of local and national development plans, including national action plans on UN Security Council Resolution 1325. \n The consistent implementation of monitoring and evaluation across all phases of the peace continuum with a focus on cross-sectoral approaches that emphasize collective programming outcomes. \n The development of innovative partnerships to achieve reintegration as part of sustaining peace, based on whole-of-government and whole-of-society approaches, involving ex-combatants, persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups and their families, as well as receiving communities. \n The engagement of the private sector in the creation of economic opportunities, fostering capacities of local small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as involving international private- sector investment in reintegration opportunities, where appropriate.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -39252,14 +39252,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.1 The Sustaining Peace Approach", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The application of a gender lens to all reintegration support.", + "Sentence": "\n The application of a gender lens to all reintegration support.", "newParagraph": "light reintegration support part sustaining peace focus n enhancement capacity peace n adoption clear definition reintegration outcome within humanitarian developmentpeace nexus recognizing strong interconnectedness among three pillar n effort actively break institutional silo eliminating fragmentation contributing comprehensive coordinated coherent ddr process n application gender lens reintegration support rationale men woman boy girl differentiated need aspiration capacity contribution n importance strengthening resilience reintegration support individual community country region lay foundation resilience stress shock associated insecure environment development local national development plan including national action plan un security council resolution 1325 n consistent implementation monitoring evaluation across phase peace continuum focus crosssectoral approach emphasize collective programming outcome n development innovative partnership achieve reintegration part sustaining peace based wholeofgovernment wholeofsociety approach involving excombatants person formerly associated armed force group family well receiving community n engagement private sector creation economic opportunity fostering capacity local small mediumsized enterprise well involving international private sector investment reintegration opportunity appropriate", "ProcessedSent": "n application gender lens reintegration support", "SentID": 2180 }, { "ParagraphID": 707, - "Paragraph": "In light of the above, reintegration support as part of sustaining peace should focus on: \\n The enhancement of capacities for peace. \\n The adoption of a clear definition of reintegration outcomes within the humanitarian- development-peace nexus, recognizing the strong interconnectedness between and among the three pillars. \\n Efforts to actively break out of institutional silos, eliminating fragmentation and contributing to a comprehensive, coordinated and coherent DDR process. \\n The application of a gender lens to all reintegration support. The rationale is that men and women, boys and girls, have differentiated needs, aspirations, capacities and contributions. \\n The importance of strengthening resilience during reintegration support. Individuals, communities, countries and regions lay the foundations for resilience to stresses and shocks associated with insecure environments through the development of local and national development plans, including national action plans on UN Security Council Resolution 1325. \\n The consistent implementation of monitoring and evaluation across all phases of the peace continuum with a focus on cross-sectoral approaches that emphasize collective programming outcomes. \\n The development of innovative partnerships to achieve reintegration as part of sustaining peace, based on whole-of-government and whole-of-society approaches, involving ex-combatants, persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups and their families, as well as receiving communities. \\n The engagement of the private sector in the creation of economic opportunities, fostering capacities of local small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as involving international private- sector investment in reintegration opportunities, where appropriate.", + "Paragraph": "In light of the above, reintegration support as part of sustaining peace should focus on: \n The enhancement of capacities for peace. \n The adoption of a clear definition of reintegration outcomes within the humanitarian- development-peace nexus, recognizing the strong interconnectedness between and among the three pillars. \n Efforts to actively break out of institutional silos, eliminating fragmentation and contributing to a comprehensive, coordinated and coherent DDR process. \n The application of a gender lens to all reintegration support. The rationale is that men and women, boys and girls, have differentiated needs, aspirations, capacities and contributions. \n The importance of strengthening resilience during reintegration support. Individuals, communities, countries and regions lay the foundations for resilience to stresses and shocks associated with insecure environments through the development of local and national development plans, including national action plans on UN Security Council Resolution 1325. \n The consistent implementation of monitoring and evaluation across all phases of the peace continuum with a focus on cross-sectoral approaches that emphasize collective programming outcomes. \n The development of innovative partnerships to achieve reintegration as part of sustaining peace, based on whole-of-government and whole-of-society approaches, involving ex-combatants, persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups and their families, as well as receiving communities. \n The engagement of the private sector in the creation of economic opportunities, fostering capacities of local small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as involving international private- sector investment in reintegration opportunities, where appropriate.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -39277,7 +39277,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 707, - "Paragraph": "In light of the above, reintegration support as part of sustaining peace should focus on: \\n The enhancement of capacities for peace. \\n The adoption of a clear definition of reintegration outcomes within the humanitarian- development-peace nexus, recognizing the strong interconnectedness between and among the three pillars. \\n Efforts to actively break out of institutional silos, eliminating fragmentation and contributing to a comprehensive, coordinated and coherent DDR process. \\n The application of a gender lens to all reintegration support. The rationale is that men and women, boys and girls, have differentiated needs, aspirations, capacities and contributions. \\n The importance of strengthening resilience during reintegration support. Individuals, communities, countries and regions lay the foundations for resilience to stresses and shocks associated with insecure environments through the development of local and national development plans, including national action plans on UN Security Council Resolution 1325. \\n The consistent implementation of monitoring and evaluation across all phases of the peace continuum with a focus on cross-sectoral approaches that emphasize collective programming outcomes. \\n The development of innovative partnerships to achieve reintegration as part of sustaining peace, based on whole-of-government and whole-of-society approaches, involving ex-combatants, persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups and their families, as well as receiving communities. \\n The engagement of the private sector in the creation of economic opportunities, fostering capacities of local small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as involving international private- sector investment in reintegration opportunities, where appropriate.", + "Paragraph": "In light of the above, reintegration support as part of sustaining peace should focus on: \n The enhancement of capacities for peace. \n The adoption of a clear definition of reintegration outcomes within the humanitarian- development-peace nexus, recognizing the strong interconnectedness between and among the three pillars. \n Efforts to actively break out of institutional silos, eliminating fragmentation and contributing to a comprehensive, coordinated and coherent DDR process. \n The application of a gender lens to all reintegration support. The rationale is that men and women, boys and girls, have differentiated needs, aspirations, capacities and contributions. \n The importance of strengthening resilience during reintegration support. Individuals, communities, countries and regions lay the foundations for resilience to stresses and shocks associated with insecure environments through the development of local and national development plans, including national action plans on UN Security Council Resolution 1325. \n The consistent implementation of monitoring and evaluation across all phases of the peace continuum with a focus on cross-sectoral approaches that emphasize collective programming outcomes. \n The development of innovative partnerships to achieve reintegration as part of sustaining peace, based on whole-of-government and whole-of-society approaches, involving ex-combatants, persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups and their families, as well as receiving communities. \n The engagement of the private sector in the creation of economic opportunities, fostering capacities of local small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as involving international private- sector investment in reintegration opportunities, where appropriate.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -39288,14 +39288,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.1 The Sustaining Peace Approach", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The importance of strengthening resilience during reintegration support.", + "Sentence": "\n The importance of strengthening resilience during reintegration support.", "newParagraph": "light reintegration support part sustaining peace focus n enhancement capacity peace n adoption clear definition reintegration outcome within humanitarian developmentpeace nexus recognizing strong interconnectedness among three pillar n effort actively break institutional silo eliminating fragmentation contributing comprehensive coordinated coherent ddr process n application gender lens reintegration support rationale men woman boy girl differentiated need aspiration capacity contribution n importance strengthening resilience reintegration support individual community country region lay foundation resilience stress shock associated insecure environment development local national development plan including national action plan un security council resolution 1325 n consistent implementation monitoring evaluation across phase peace continuum focus crosssectoral approach emphasize collective programming outcome n development innovative partnership achieve reintegration part sustaining peace based wholeofgovernment wholeofsociety approach involving excombatants person formerly associated armed force group family well receiving community n engagement private sector creation economic opportunity fostering capacity local small mediumsized enterprise well involving international private sector investment reintegration opportunity appropriate", "ProcessedSent": "n importance strengthening resilience reintegration support", "SentID": 2182 }, { "ParagraphID": 707, - "Paragraph": "In light of the above, reintegration support as part of sustaining peace should focus on: \\n The enhancement of capacities for peace. \\n The adoption of a clear definition of reintegration outcomes within the humanitarian- development-peace nexus, recognizing the strong interconnectedness between and among the three pillars. \\n Efforts to actively break out of institutional silos, eliminating fragmentation and contributing to a comprehensive, coordinated and coherent DDR process. \\n The application of a gender lens to all reintegration support. The rationale is that men and women, boys and girls, have differentiated needs, aspirations, capacities and contributions. \\n The importance of strengthening resilience during reintegration support. Individuals, communities, countries and regions lay the foundations for resilience to stresses and shocks associated with insecure environments through the development of local and national development plans, including national action plans on UN Security Council Resolution 1325. \\n The consistent implementation of monitoring and evaluation across all phases of the peace continuum with a focus on cross-sectoral approaches that emphasize collective programming outcomes. \\n The development of innovative partnerships to achieve reintegration as part of sustaining peace, based on whole-of-government and whole-of-society approaches, involving ex-combatants, persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups and their families, as well as receiving communities. \\n The engagement of the private sector in the creation of economic opportunities, fostering capacities of local small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as involving international private- sector investment in reintegration opportunities, where appropriate.", + "Paragraph": "In light of the above, reintegration support as part of sustaining peace should focus on: \n The enhancement of capacities for peace. \n The adoption of a clear definition of reintegration outcomes within the humanitarian- development-peace nexus, recognizing the strong interconnectedness between and among the three pillars. \n Efforts to actively break out of institutional silos, eliminating fragmentation and contributing to a comprehensive, coordinated and coherent DDR process. \n The application of a gender lens to all reintegration support. The rationale is that men and women, boys and girls, have differentiated needs, aspirations, capacities and contributions. \n The importance of strengthening resilience during reintegration support. Individuals, communities, countries and regions lay the foundations for resilience to stresses and shocks associated with insecure environments through the development of local and national development plans, including national action plans on UN Security Council Resolution 1325. \n The consistent implementation of monitoring and evaluation across all phases of the peace continuum with a focus on cross-sectoral approaches that emphasize collective programming outcomes. \n The development of innovative partnerships to achieve reintegration as part of sustaining peace, based on whole-of-government and whole-of-society approaches, involving ex-combatants, persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups and their families, as well as receiving communities. \n The engagement of the private sector in the creation of economic opportunities, fostering capacities of local small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as involving international private- sector investment in reintegration opportunities, where appropriate.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -39313,7 +39313,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 707, - "Paragraph": "In light of the above, reintegration support as part of sustaining peace should focus on: \\n The enhancement of capacities for peace. \\n The adoption of a clear definition of reintegration outcomes within the humanitarian- development-peace nexus, recognizing the strong interconnectedness between and among the three pillars. \\n Efforts to actively break out of institutional silos, eliminating fragmentation and contributing to a comprehensive, coordinated and coherent DDR process. \\n The application of a gender lens to all reintegration support. The rationale is that men and women, boys and girls, have differentiated needs, aspirations, capacities and contributions. \\n The importance of strengthening resilience during reintegration support. Individuals, communities, countries and regions lay the foundations for resilience to stresses and shocks associated with insecure environments through the development of local and national development plans, including national action plans on UN Security Council Resolution 1325. \\n The consistent implementation of monitoring and evaluation across all phases of the peace continuum with a focus on cross-sectoral approaches that emphasize collective programming outcomes. \\n The development of innovative partnerships to achieve reintegration as part of sustaining peace, based on whole-of-government and whole-of-society approaches, involving ex-combatants, persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups and their families, as well as receiving communities. \\n The engagement of the private sector in the creation of economic opportunities, fostering capacities of local small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as involving international private- sector investment in reintegration opportunities, where appropriate.", + "Paragraph": "In light of the above, reintegration support as part of sustaining peace should focus on: \n The enhancement of capacities for peace. \n The adoption of a clear definition of reintegration outcomes within the humanitarian- development-peace nexus, recognizing the strong interconnectedness between and among the three pillars. \n Efforts to actively break out of institutional silos, eliminating fragmentation and contributing to a comprehensive, coordinated and coherent DDR process. \n The application of a gender lens to all reintegration support. The rationale is that men and women, boys and girls, have differentiated needs, aspirations, capacities and contributions. \n The importance of strengthening resilience during reintegration support. Individuals, communities, countries and regions lay the foundations for resilience to stresses and shocks associated with insecure environments through the development of local and national development plans, including national action plans on UN Security Council Resolution 1325. \n The consistent implementation of monitoring and evaluation across all phases of the peace continuum with a focus on cross-sectoral approaches that emphasize collective programming outcomes. \n The development of innovative partnerships to achieve reintegration as part of sustaining peace, based on whole-of-government and whole-of-society approaches, involving ex-combatants, persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups and their families, as well as receiving communities. \n The engagement of the private sector in the creation of economic opportunities, fostering capacities of local small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as involving international private- sector investment in reintegration opportunities, where appropriate.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -39324,14 +39324,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.1 The Sustaining Peace Approach", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The consistent implementation of monitoring and evaluation across all phases of the peace continuum with a focus on cross-sectoral approaches that emphasize collective programming outcomes.", + "Sentence": "\n The consistent implementation of monitoring and evaluation across all phases of the peace continuum with a focus on cross-sectoral approaches that emphasize collective programming outcomes.", "newParagraph": "light reintegration support part sustaining peace focus n enhancement capacity peace n adoption clear definition reintegration outcome within humanitarian developmentpeace nexus recognizing strong interconnectedness among three pillar n effort actively break institutional silo eliminating fragmentation contributing comprehensive coordinated coherent ddr process n application gender lens reintegration support rationale men woman boy girl differentiated need aspiration capacity contribution n importance strengthening resilience reintegration support individual community country region lay foundation resilience stress shock associated insecure environment development local national development plan including national action plan un security council resolution 1325 n consistent implementation monitoring evaluation across phase peace continuum focus crosssectoral approach emphasize collective programming outcome n development innovative partnership achieve reintegration part sustaining peace based wholeofgovernment wholeofsociety approach involving excombatants person formerly associated armed force group family well receiving community n engagement private sector creation economic opportunity fostering capacity local small mediumsized enterprise well involving international private sector investment reintegration opportunity appropriate", "ProcessedSent": "n consistent implementation monitoring evaluation across phase peace continuum focus crosssectoral approach emphasize collective programming outcome", "SentID": 2184 }, { "ParagraphID": 707, - "Paragraph": "In light of the above, reintegration support as part of sustaining peace should focus on: \\n The enhancement of capacities for peace. \\n The adoption of a clear definition of reintegration outcomes within the humanitarian- development-peace nexus, recognizing the strong interconnectedness between and among the three pillars. \\n Efforts to actively break out of institutional silos, eliminating fragmentation and contributing to a comprehensive, coordinated and coherent DDR process. \\n The application of a gender lens to all reintegration support. The rationale is that men and women, boys and girls, have differentiated needs, aspirations, capacities and contributions. \\n The importance of strengthening resilience during reintegration support. Individuals, communities, countries and regions lay the foundations for resilience to stresses and shocks associated with insecure environments through the development of local and national development plans, including national action plans on UN Security Council Resolution 1325. \\n The consistent implementation of monitoring and evaluation across all phases of the peace continuum with a focus on cross-sectoral approaches that emphasize collective programming outcomes. \\n The development of innovative partnerships to achieve reintegration as part of sustaining peace, based on whole-of-government and whole-of-society approaches, involving ex-combatants, persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups and their families, as well as receiving communities. \\n The engagement of the private sector in the creation of economic opportunities, fostering capacities of local small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as involving international private- sector investment in reintegration opportunities, where appropriate.", + "Paragraph": "In light of the above, reintegration support as part of sustaining peace should focus on: \n The enhancement of capacities for peace. \n The adoption of a clear definition of reintegration outcomes within the humanitarian- development-peace nexus, recognizing the strong interconnectedness between and among the three pillars. \n Efforts to actively break out of institutional silos, eliminating fragmentation and contributing to a comprehensive, coordinated and coherent DDR process. \n The application of a gender lens to all reintegration support. The rationale is that men and women, boys and girls, have differentiated needs, aspirations, capacities and contributions. \n The importance of strengthening resilience during reintegration support. Individuals, communities, countries and regions lay the foundations for resilience to stresses and shocks associated with insecure environments through the development of local and national development plans, including national action plans on UN Security Council Resolution 1325. \n The consistent implementation of monitoring and evaluation across all phases of the peace continuum with a focus on cross-sectoral approaches that emphasize collective programming outcomes. \n The development of innovative partnerships to achieve reintegration as part of sustaining peace, based on whole-of-government and whole-of-society approaches, involving ex-combatants, persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups and their families, as well as receiving communities. \n The engagement of the private sector in the creation of economic opportunities, fostering capacities of local small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as involving international private- sector investment in reintegration opportunities, where appropriate.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -39342,14 +39342,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.1 The Sustaining Peace Approach", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The development of innovative partnerships to achieve reintegration as part of sustaining peace, based on whole-of-government and whole-of-society approaches, involving ex-combatants, persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups and their families, as well as receiving communities.", + "Sentence": "\n The development of innovative partnerships to achieve reintegration as part of sustaining peace, based on whole-of-government and whole-of-society approaches, involving ex-combatants, persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups and their families, as well as receiving communities.", "newParagraph": "light reintegration support part sustaining peace focus n enhancement capacity peace n adoption clear definition reintegration outcome within humanitarian developmentpeace nexus recognizing strong interconnectedness among three pillar n effort actively break institutional silo eliminating fragmentation contributing comprehensive coordinated coherent ddr process n application gender lens reintegration support rationale men woman boy girl differentiated need aspiration capacity contribution n importance strengthening resilience reintegration support individual community country region lay foundation resilience stress shock associated insecure environment development local national development plan including national action plan un security council resolution 1325 n consistent implementation monitoring evaluation across phase peace continuum focus crosssectoral approach emphasize collective programming outcome n development innovative partnership achieve reintegration part sustaining peace based wholeofgovernment wholeofsociety approach involving excombatants person formerly associated armed force group family well receiving community n engagement private sector creation economic opportunity fostering capacity local small mediumsized enterprise well involving international private sector investment reintegration opportunity appropriate", "ProcessedSent": "n development innovative partnership achieve reintegration part sustaining peace based wholeofgovernment wholeofsociety approach involving excombatants person formerly associated armed force group family well receiving community", "SentID": 2185 }, { "ParagraphID": 707, - "Paragraph": "In light of the above, reintegration support as part of sustaining peace should focus on: \\n The enhancement of capacities for peace. \\n The adoption of a clear definition of reintegration outcomes within the humanitarian- development-peace nexus, recognizing the strong interconnectedness between and among the three pillars. \\n Efforts to actively break out of institutional silos, eliminating fragmentation and contributing to a comprehensive, coordinated and coherent DDR process. \\n The application of a gender lens to all reintegration support. The rationale is that men and women, boys and girls, have differentiated needs, aspirations, capacities and contributions. \\n The importance of strengthening resilience during reintegration support. Individuals, communities, countries and regions lay the foundations for resilience to stresses and shocks associated with insecure environments through the development of local and national development plans, including national action plans on UN Security Council Resolution 1325. \\n The consistent implementation of monitoring and evaluation across all phases of the peace continuum with a focus on cross-sectoral approaches that emphasize collective programming outcomes. \\n The development of innovative partnerships to achieve reintegration as part of sustaining peace, based on whole-of-government and whole-of-society approaches, involving ex-combatants, persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups and their families, as well as receiving communities. \\n The engagement of the private sector in the creation of economic opportunities, fostering capacities of local small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as involving international private- sector investment in reintegration opportunities, where appropriate.", + "Paragraph": "In light of the above, reintegration support as part of sustaining peace should focus on: \n The enhancement of capacities for peace. \n The adoption of a clear definition of reintegration outcomes within the humanitarian- development-peace nexus, recognizing the strong interconnectedness between and among the three pillars. \n Efforts to actively break out of institutional silos, eliminating fragmentation and contributing to a comprehensive, coordinated and coherent DDR process. \n The application of a gender lens to all reintegration support. The rationale is that men and women, boys and girls, have differentiated needs, aspirations, capacities and contributions. \n The importance of strengthening resilience during reintegration support. Individuals, communities, countries and regions lay the foundations for resilience to stresses and shocks associated with insecure environments through the development of local and national development plans, including national action plans on UN Security Council Resolution 1325. \n The consistent implementation of monitoring and evaluation across all phases of the peace continuum with a focus on cross-sectoral approaches that emphasize collective programming outcomes. \n The development of innovative partnerships to achieve reintegration as part of sustaining peace, based on whole-of-government and whole-of-society approaches, involving ex-combatants, persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups and their families, as well as receiving communities. \n The engagement of the private sector in the creation of economic opportunities, fostering capacities of local small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as involving international private- sector investment in reintegration opportunities, where appropriate.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -39360,14 +39360,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.1 The Sustaining Peace Approach", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The engagement of the private sector in the creation of economic opportunities, fostering capacities of local small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as involving international private- sector investment in reintegration opportunities, where appropriate.", + "Sentence": "\n The engagement of the private sector in the creation of economic opportunities, fostering capacities of local small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as involving international private- sector investment in reintegration opportunities, where appropriate.", "newParagraph": "light reintegration support part sustaining peace focus n enhancement capacity peace n adoption clear definition reintegration outcome within humanitarian developmentpeace nexus recognizing strong interconnectedness among three pillar n effort actively break institutional silo eliminating fragmentation contributing comprehensive coordinated coherent ddr process n application gender lens reintegration support rationale men woman boy girl differentiated need aspiration capacity contribution n importance strengthening resilience reintegration support individual community country region lay foundation resilience stress shock associated insecure environment development local national development plan including national action plan un security council resolution 1325 n consistent implementation monitoring evaluation across phase peace continuum focus crosssectoral approach emphasize collective programming outcome n development innovative partnership achieve reintegration part sustaining peace based wholeofgovernment wholeofsociety approach involving excombatants person formerly associated armed force group family well receiving community n engagement private sector creation economic opportunity fostering capacity local small mediumsized enterprise well involving international private sector investment reintegration opportunity appropriate", "ProcessedSent": "n engagement private sector creation economic opportunity fostering capacity local small mediumsized enterprise well involving international private sector investment reintegration opportunity appropriate", "SentID": 2186 }, { "ParagraphID": 708, - "Paragraph": "For reintegration programmes to play their role in sustaining peace effectively, DDR practitioners and others involved in the planning and implementation of reintegration support should ensure that they: \\n Have a shared understanding of the drivers of a specific conflict, as well as the risks faced by individuals who are reintegrating and their receiving communities and countries; \\n Conduct joint analysis and monitoring and evaluation allowing for the development of strategic approaches that can strengthen peace and resilience; \\n Align with the women, peace and security agenda, ensuring that gender considerations are front and centre in reintegration support; \\n Have a shared understanding of the importance of youth in all efforts towards peace and security; \\\n Foster collective ownership by local authorities and other stakeholders that is anchored in local and national development plans \u2013 the international community shall play a supporting role and avoid creating parallel structures; \\n Create the long-term partnerships necessary for sustaining peace through the development of local institutional capacity, adaptive programming that is responsive to the context, and adequate human and financial resources.", + "Paragraph": "For reintegration programmes to play their role in sustaining peace effectively, DDR practitioners and others involved in the planning and implementation of reintegration support should ensure that they: \n Have a shared understanding of the drivers of a specific conflict, as well as the risks faced by individuals who are reintegrating and their receiving communities and countries; \n Conduct joint analysis and monitoring and evaluation allowing for the development of strategic approaches that can strengthen peace and resilience; \n Align with the women, peace and security agenda, ensuring that gender considerations are front and centre in reintegration support; \n Have a shared understanding of the importance of youth in all efforts towards peace and security; \\n Foster collective ownership by local authorities and other stakeholders that is anchored in local and national development plans \u2013 the international community shall play a supporting role and avoid creating parallel structures; \n Create the long-term partnerships necessary for sustaining peace through the development of local institutional capacity, adaptive programming that is responsive to the context, and adequate human and financial resources.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -39378,7 +39378,7 @@ "Heading2": "4.1 The Sustaining Peace Approach", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "For reintegration programmes to play their role in sustaining peace effectively, DDR practitioners and others involved in the planning and implementation of reintegration support should ensure that they: \\n Have a shared understanding of the drivers of a specific conflict, as well as the risks faced by individuals who are reintegrating and their receiving communities and countries; \\n Conduct joint analysis and monitoring and evaluation allowing for the development of strategic approaches that can strengthen peace and resilience; \\n Align with the women, peace and security agenda, ensuring that gender considerations are front and centre in reintegration support; \\n Have a shared understanding of the importance of youth in all efforts towards peace and security; \\\n Foster collective ownership by local authorities and other stakeholders that is anchored in local and national development plans \u2013 the international community shall play a supporting role and avoid creating parallel structures; \\n Create the long-term partnerships necessary for sustaining peace through the development of local institutional capacity, adaptive programming that is responsive to the context, and adequate human and financial resources.", + "Sentence": "For reintegration programmes to play their role in sustaining peace effectively, DDR practitioners and others involved in the planning and implementation of reintegration support should ensure that they: \n Have a shared understanding of the drivers of a specific conflict, as well as the risks faced by individuals who are reintegrating and their receiving communities and countries; \n Conduct joint analysis and monitoring and evaluation allowing for the development of strategic approaches that can strengthen peace and resilience; \n Align with the women, peace and security agenda, ensuring that gender considerations are front and centre in reintegration support; \n Have a shared understanding of the importance of youth in all efforts towards peace and security; \\n Foster collective ownership by local authorities and other stakeholders that is anchored in local and national development plans \u2013 the international community shall play a supporting role and avoid creating parallel structures; \n Create the long-term partnerships necessary for sustaining peace through the development of local institutional capacity, adaptive programming that is responsive to the context, and adequate human and financial resources.", "newParagraph": "reintegration programme play role sustaining peace effectively ddr practitioner others involved planning implementation reintegration support ensure n shared understanding driver specific conflict well risk faced individual reintegrating receiving community country n conduct joint analysis monitoring evaluation allowing development strategic approach strengthen peace resilience n align woman peace security agenda ensuring gender consideration front centre reintegration support n shared understanding importance youth effort towards peace security foster collective ownership local authority stakeholder anchored local national development plan international community shall play supporting role avoid creating parallel structure n create longterm partnership necessary sustaining peace development local institutional capacity adaptive programming responsive context adequate human financial resource", "ProcessedSent": "reintegration programme play role sustaining peace effectively ddr practitioner others involved planning implementation reintegration support ensure n shared understanding driver specific conflict well risk faced individual reintegrating receiving community country n conduct joint analysis monitoring evaluation allowing development strategic approach strengthen peace resilience n align woman peace security agenda ensuring gender consideration front centre reintegration support n shared understanding importance youth effort towards peace security foster collective ownership local authority stakeholder anchored local national development plan international community shall play supporting role avoid creating parallel structure n create longterm partnership necessary sustaining peace development local institutional capacity adaptive programming responsive context adequate human financial resource", "SentID": 2187 @@ -39925,7 +39925,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 716, - "Paragraph": "In addition to programmed support, there are numerous non-programmatic factors that can have a major impact on whether or not reintegration is successful. Some of the key non-programmatic factors are: \\n Acceptance in the community\/society; \\n The general security situation\/perception of the security situation; \\n The economic environment and associated opportunities; \\n The availability of relevant basic and social services; \\n The protection of land rights and other property rights.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to programmed support, there are numerous non-programmatic factors that can have a major impact on whether or not reintegration is successful. Some of the key non-programmatic factors are: \n Acceptance in the community\/society; \n The general security situation\/perception of the security situation; \n The economic environment and associated opportunities; \n The availability of relevant basic and social services; \n The protection of land rights and other property rights.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -39943,7 +39943,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 716, - "Paragraph": "In addition to programmed support, there are numerous non-programmatic factors that can have a major impact on whether or not reintegration is successful. Some of the key non-programmatic factors are: \\n Acceptance in the community\/society; \\n The general security situation\/perception of the security situation; \\n The economic environment and associated opportunities; \\n The availability of relevant basic and social services; \\n The protection of land rights and other property rights.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to programmed support, there are numerous non-programmatic factors that can have a major impact on whether or not reintegration is successful. Some of the key non-programmatic factors are: \n Acceptance in the community\/society; \n The general security situation\/perception of the security situation; \n The economic environment and associated opportunities; \n The availability of relevant basic and social services; \n The protection of land rights and other property rights.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -39954,7 +39954,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Some of the key non-programmatic factors are: \\n Acceptance in the community\/society; \\n The general security situation\/perception of the security situation; \\n The economic environment and associated opportunities; \\n The availability of relevant basic and social services; \\n The protection of land rights and other property rights.", + "Sentence": "Some of the key non-programmatic factors are: \n Acceptance in the community\/society; \n The general security situation\/perception of the security situation; \n The economic environment and associated opportunities; \n The availability of relevant basic and social services; \n The protection of land rights and other property rights.", "newParagraph": "addition programmed support numerous nonprogrammatic factor major impact whether reintegration successful key nonprogrammatic factor n acceptance communitysociety n general security situationperception security situation n economic environment associated opportunity n availability relevant basic social service n protection land right property right", "ProcessedSent": "key nonprogrammatic factor n acceptance communitysociety n general security situationperception security situation n economic environment associated opportunity n availability relevant basic social service n protection land right property right", "SentID": 2219 @@ -40375,7 +40375,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 722, - "Paragraph": "Second, while some reintegration support measures focus on education, vocational skills training and income-generating opportunities, they may help to prevent conflict if aligned with and supportive of the absorption capacities of receiving communities. Situated within the humanitarian-development-peace nexus, approaches to reintegration support shall be sensitive to the fact that populations in fragile situations and subjected to protracted conflict experience diverse needs simultaneously \u2013 be they humanitarian, security-related or developmental. As a result, reintegration support may only play an effective role in conflict prevention when these needs are acknowledged and addressed comprehensively. Thus, reintegration programmes can help to prevent conflict only when they account for: \\n The motivations of individuals to engage in and leave armed groups; \\n The criminogenic, or crime-inducing, risks present in the context that may impede sustained reintegration and increase vulnerability to involvement in armed groups and other criminal behaviour; \\n Local needs and existing capacities; \\n The strengthened resilience of individuals, families, communities and institutions to cope with adversity and to withstand violence and conflict-related pressures.", + "Paragraph": "Second, while some reintegration support measures focus on education, vocational skills training and income-generating opportunities, they may help to prevent conflict if aligned with and supportive of the absorption capacities of receiving communities. Situated within the humanitarian-development-peace nexus, approaches to reintegration support shall be sensitive to the fact that populations in fragile situations and subjected to protracted conflict experience diverse needs simultaneously \u2013 be they humanitarian, security-related or developmental. As a result, reintegration support may only play an effective role in conflict prevention when these needs are acknowledged and addressed comprehensively. Thus, reintegration programmes can help to prevent conflict only when they account for: \n The motivations of individuals to engage in and leave armed groups; \n The criminogenic, or crime-inducing, risks present in the context that may impede sustained reintegration and increase vulnerability to involvement in armed groups and other criminal behaviour; \n Local needs and existing capacities; \n The strengthened resilience of individuals, families, communities and institutions to cope with adversity and to withstand violence and conflict-related pressures.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -40393,7 +40393,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 722, - "Paragraph": "Second, while some reintegration support measures focus on education, vocational skills training and income-generating opportunities, they may help to prevent conflict if aligned with and supportive of the absorption capacities of receiving communities. Situated within the humanitarian-development-peace nexus, approaches to reintegration support shall be sensitive to the fact that populations in fragile situations and subjected to protracted conflict experience diverse needs simultaneously \u2013 be they humanitarian, security-related or developmental. As a result, reintegration support may only play an effective role in conflict prevention when these needs are acknowledged and addressed comprehensively. Thus, reintegration programmes can help to prevent conflict only when they account for: \\n The motivations of individuals to engage in and leave armed groups; \\n The criminogenic, or crime-inducing, risks present in the context that may impede sustained reintegration and increase vulnerability to involvement in armed groups and other criminal behaviour; \\n Local needs and existing capacities; \\n The strengthened resilience of individuals, families, communities and institutions to cope with adversity and to withstand violence and conflict-related pressures.", + "Paragraph": "Second, while some reintegration support measures focus on education, vocational skills training and income-generating opportunities, they may help to prevent conflict if aligned with and supportive of the absorption capacities of receiving communities. Situated within the humanitarian-development-peace nexus, approaches to reintegration support shall be sensitive to the fact that populations in fragile situations and subjected to protracted conflict experience diverse needs simultaneously \u2013 be they humanitarian, security-related or developmental. As a result, reintegration support may only play an effective role in conflict prevention when these needs are acknowledged and addressed comprehensively. Thus, reintegration programmes can help to prevent conflict only when they account for: \n The motivations of individuals to engage in and leave armed groups; \n The criminogenic, or crime-inducing, risks present in the context that may impede sustained reintegration and increase vulnerability to involvement in armed groups and other criminal behaviour; \n Local needs and existing capacities; \n The strengthened resilience of individuals, families, communities and institutions to cope with adversity and to withstand violence and conflict-related pressures.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -40411,7 +40411,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 722, - "Paragraph": "Second, while some reintegration support measures focus on education, vocational skills training and income-generating opportunities, they may help to prevent conflict if aligned with and supportive of the absorption capacities of receiving communities. Situated within the humanitarian-development-peace nexus, approaches to reintegration support shall be sensitive to the fact that populations in fragile situations and subjected to protracted conflict experience diverse needs simultaneously \u2013 be they humanitarian, security-related or developmental. As a result, reintegration support may only play an effective role in conflict prevention when these needs are acknowledged and addressed comprehensively. Thus, reintegration programmes can help to prevent conflict only when they account for: \\n The motivations of individuals to engage in and leave armed groups; \\n The criminogenic, or crime-inducing, risks present in the context that may impede sustained reintegration and increase vulnerability to involvement in armed groups and other criminal behaviour; \\n Local needs and existing capacities; \\n The strengthened resilience of individuals, families, communities and institutions to cope with adversity and to withstand violence and conflict-related pressures.", + "Paragraph": "Second, while some reintegration support measures focus on education, vocational skills training and income-generating opportunities, they may help to prevent conflict if aligned with and supportive of the absorption capacities of receiving communities. Situated within the humanitarian-development-peace nexus, approaches to reintegration support shall be sensitive to the fact that populations in fragile situations and subjected to protracted conflict experience diverse needs simultaneously \u2013 be they humanitarian, security-related or developmental. As a result, reintegration support may only play an effective role in conflict prevention when these needs are acknowledged and addressed comprehensively. Thus, reintegration programmes can help to prevent conflict only when they account for: \n The motivations of individuals to engage in and leave armed groups; \n The criminogenic, or crime-inducing, risks present in the context that may impede sustained reintegration and increase vulnerability to involvement in armed groups and other criminal behaviour; \n Local needs and existing capacities; \n The strengthened resilience of individuals, families, communities and institutions to cope with adversity and to withstand violence and conflict-related pressures.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -40429,7 +40429,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 722, - "Paragraph": "Second, while some reintegration support measures focus on education, vocational skills training and income-generating opportunities, they may help to prevent conflict if aligned with and supportive of the absorption capacities of receiving communities. Situated within the humanitarian-development-peace nexus, approaches to reintegration support shall be sensitive to the fact that populations in fragile situations and subjected to protracted conflict experience diverse needs simultaneously \u2013 be they humanitarian, security-related or developmental. As a result, reintegration support may only play an effective role in conflict prevention when these needs are acknowledged and addressed comprehensively. Thus, reintegration programmes can help to prevent conflict only when they account for: \\n The motivations of individuals to engage in and leave armed groups; \\n The criminogenic, or crime-inducing, risks present in the context that may impede sustained reintegration and increase vulnerability to involvement in armed groups and other criminal behaviour; \\n Local needs and existing capacities; \\n The strengthened resilience of individuals, families, communities and institutions to cope with adversity and to withstand violence and conflict-related pressures.", + "Paragraph": "Second, while some reintegration support measures focus on education, vocational skills training and income-generating opportunities, they may help to prevent conflict if aligned with and supportive of the absorption capacities of receiving communities. Situated within the humanitarian-development-peace nexus, approaches to reintegration support shall be sensitive to the fact that populations in fragile situations and subjected to protracted conflict experience diverse needs simultaneously \u2013 be they humanitarian, security-related or developmental. As a result, reintegration support may only play an effective role in conflict prevention when these needs are acknowledged and addressed comprehensively. Thus, reintegration programmes can help to prevent conflict only when they account for: \n The motivations of individuals to engage in and leave armed groups; \n The criminogenic, or crime-inducing, risks present in the context that may impede sustained reintegration and increase vulnerability to involvement in armed groups and other criminal behaviour; \n Local needs and existing capacities; \n The strengthened resilience of individuals, families, communities and institutions to cope with adversity and to withstand violence and conflict-related pressures.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -40440,7 +40440,7 @@ "Heading2": "5.2 Reintegration support for conflict prevention", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Thus, reintegration programmes can help to prevent conflict only when they account for: \\n The motivations of individuals to engage in and leave armed groups; \\n The criminogenic, or crime-inducing, risks present in the context that may impede sustained reintegration and increase vulnerability to involvement in armed groups and other criminal behaviour; \\n Local needs and existing capacities; \\n The strengthened resilience of individuals, families, communities and institutions to cope with adversity and to withstand violence and conflict-related pressures.", + "Sentence": "Thus, reintegration programmes can help to prevent conflict only when they account for: \n The motivations of individuals to engage in and leave armed groups; \n The criminogenic, or crime-inducing, risks present in the context that may impede sustained reintegration and increase vulnerability to involvement in armed groups and other criminal behaviour; \n Local needs and existing capacities; \n The strengthened resilience of individuals, families, communities and institutions to cope with adversity and to withstand violence and conflict-related pressures.", "newParagraph": "second reintegration support measure focus education vocational skill training incomegenerating opportunity may help prevent conflict aligned supportive absorption capacity receiving community situated within humanitariandevelopmentpeace nexus approach reintegration support shall sensitive fact population fragile situation subjected protracted conflict experience diverse need simultaneously humanitarian securityrelated developmental result reintegration support may play effective role conflict prevention need acknowledged addressed comprehensively thus reintegration programme help prevent conflict account n motivation individual engage leave armed group n criminogenic crimeinducing risk present context may impede sustained reintegration increase vulnerability involvement armed group criminal behaviour n local need existing capacity n strengthened resilience individual family community institution cope adversity withstand violence conflictrelated pressure", "ProcessedSent": "thus reintegration programme help prevent conflict account n motivation individual engage leave armed group n criminogenic crimeinducing risk present context may impede sustained reintegration increase vulnerability involvement armed group criminal behaviour n local need existing capacity n strengthened resilience individual family community institution cope adversity withstand violence conflictrelated pressure", "SentID": 2246 @@ -40483,7 +40483,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 724, - "Paragraph": "From a conflict sensitivity angle, it is important to note that reintegration support is sometimes provided later than expected, and that actual levels of support are sometimes lower than foreseen, for example, due to slow political processes, logistical constraints and\/or the unavailability (or delay) of financing. It is therefore important to explicitly raise questions about the possible negative impact of waiting for reintegration support on the actual reintegration processes of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups. The following questions should be raised as soon as the negotiation and planning of reintegration support begins: \\n Is the reintegration support foreseen realistic? \\n Will the reintegration support be able to meet the various expectations? \\n How will the (expected) reintegration support affect the coping strategies of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups? \\n What are potential negative effects of reintegration support on social dynamics, power dynamics and social equity issues? \\n How can expectations and\/or misinformation concerning reintegration support be managed by the relevant Government and UN agencies, for example, through appropriate communication and risk management?", + "Paragraph": "From a conflict sensitivity angle, it is important to note that reintegration support is sometimes provided later than expected, and that actual levels of support are sometimes lower than foreseen, for example, due to slow political processes, logistical constraints and\/or the unavailability (or delay) of financing. It is therefore important to explicitly raise questions about the possible negative impact of waiting for reintegration support on the actual reintegration processes of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups. The following questions should be raised as soon as the negotiation and planning of reintegration support begins: \n Is the reintegration support foreseen realistic? \n Will the reintegration support be able to meet the various expectations? \n How will the (expected) reintegration support affect the coping strategies of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups? \n What are potential negative effects of reintegration support on social dynamics, power dynamics and social equity issues? \n How can expectations and\/or misinformation concerning reintegration support be managed by the relevant Government and UN agencies, for example, through appropriate communication and risk management?", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -40501,7 +40501,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 724, - "Paragraph": "From a conflict sensitivity angle, it is important to note that reintegration support is sometimes provided later than expected, and that actual levels of support are sometimes lower than foreseen, for example, due to slow political processes, logistical constraints and\/or the unavailability (or delay) of financing. It is therefore important to explicitly raise questions about the possible negative impact of waiting for reintegration support on the actual reintegration processes of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups. The following questions should be raised as soon as the negotiation and planning of reintegration support begins: \\n Is the reintegration support foreseen realistic? \\n Will the reintegration support be able to meet the various expectations? \\n How will the (expected) reintegration support affect the coping strategies of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups? \\n What are potential negative effects of reintegration support on social dynamics, power dynamics and social equity issues? \\n How can expectations and\/or misinformation concerning reintegration support be managed by the relevant Government and UN agencies, for example, through appropriate communication and risk management?", + "Paragraph": "From a conflict sensitivity angle, it is important to note that reintegration support is sometimes provided later than expected, and that actual levels of support are sometimes lower than foreseen, for example, due to slow political processes, logistical constraints and\/or the unavailability (or delay) of financing. It is therefore important to explicitly raise questions about the possible negative impact of waiting for reintegration support on the actual reintegration processes of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups. The following questions should be raised as soon as the negotiation and planning of reintegration support begins: \n Is the reintegration support foreseen realistic? \n Will the reintegration support be able to meet the various expectations? \n How will the (expected) reintegration support affect the coping strategies of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups? \n What are potential negative effects of reintegration support on social dynamics, power dynamics and social equity issues? \n How can expectations and\/or misinformation concerning reintegration support be managed by the relevant Government and UN agencies, for example, through appropriate communication and risk management?", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -40519,7 +40519,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 724, - "Paragraph": "From a conflict sensitivity angle, it is important to note that reintegration support is sometimes provided later than expected, and that actual levels of support are sometimes lower than foreseen, for example, due to slow political processes, logistical constraints and\/or the unavailability (or delay) of financing. It is therefore important to explicitly raise questions about the possible negative impact of waiting for reintegration support on the actual reintegration processes of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups. The following questions should be raised as soon as the negotiation and planning of reintegration support begins: \\n Is the reintegration support foreseen realistic? \\n Will the reintegration support be able to meet the various expectations? \\n How will the (expected) reintegration support affect the coping strategies of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups? \\n What are potential negative effects of reintegration support on social dynamics, power dynamics and social equity issues? \\n How can expectations and\/or misinformation concerning reintegration support be managed by the relevant Government and UN agencies, for example, through appropriate communication and risk management?", + "Paragraph": "From a conflict sensitivity angle, it is important to note that reintegration support is sometimes provided later than expected, and that actual levels of support are sometimes lower than foreseen, for example, due to slow political processes, logistical constraints and\/or the unavailability (or delay) of financing. It is therefore important to explicitly raise questions about the possible negative impact of waiting for reintegration support on the actual reintegration processes of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups. The following questions should be raised as soon as the negotiation and planning of reintegration support begins: \n Is the reintegration support foreseen realistic? \n Will the reintegration support be able to meet the various expectations? \n How will the (expected) reintegration support affect the coping strategies of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups? \n What are potential negative effects of reintegration support on social dynamics, power dynamics and social equity issues? \n How can expectations and\/or misinformation concerning reintegration support be managed by the relevant Government and UN agencies, for example, through appropriate communication and risk management?", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -40530,14 +40530,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2 Reintegration support for conflict prevention", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The following questions should be raised as soon as the negotiation and planning of reintegration support begins: \\n Is the reintegration support foreseen realistic?", + "Sentence": "The following questions should be raised as soon as the negotiation and planning of reintegration support begins: \n Is the reintegration support foreseen realistic?", "newParagraph": "conflict sensitivity angle important note reintegration support sometimes provided later expected actual level support sometimes lower foreseen example due slow political process logistical constraint andor unavailability delay financing therefore important explicitly raise question possible negative impact waiting reintegration support actual reintegration process excombatants person formerly associated armed force group following question raised soon negotiation planning reintegration support begin n reintegration support foreseen realistic n reintegration support able meet various expectation n expected reintegration support affect coping strategy excombatants person formerly associated armed force group n potential negative effect reintegration support social dynamic power dynamic social equity issue n expectation andor misinformation concerning reintegration support managed relevant government un agency example appropriate communication risk management", "ProcessedSent": "following question raised soon negotiation planning reintegration support begin n reintegration support foreseen realistic", "SentID": 2251 }, { "ParagraphID": 724, - "Paragraph": "From a conflict sensitivity angle, it is important to note that reintegration support is sometimes provided later than expected, and that actual levels of support are sometimes lower than foreseen, for example, due to slow political processes, logistical constraints and\/or the unavailability (or delay) of financing. It is therefore important to explicitly raise questions about the possible negative impact of waiting for reintegration support on the actual reintegration processes of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups. The following questions should be raised as soon as the negotiation and planning of reintegration support begins: \\n Is the reintegration support foreseen realistic? \\n Will the reintegration support be able to meet the various expectations? \\n How will the (expected) reintegration support affect the coping strategies of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups? \\n What are potential negative effects of reintegration support on social dynamics, power dynamics and social equity issues? \\n How can expectations and\/or misinformation concerning reintegration support be managed by the relevant Government and UN agencies, for example, through appropriate communication and risk management?", + "Paragraph": "From a conflict sensitivity angle, it is important to note that reintegration support is sometimes provided later than expected, and that actual levels of support are sometimes lower than foreseen, for example, due to slow political processes, logistical constraints and\/or the unavailability (or delay) of financing. It is therefore important to explicitly raise questions about the possible negative impact of waiting for reintegration support on the actual reintegration processes of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups. The following questions should be raised as soon as the negotiation and planning of reintegration support begins: \n Is the reintegration support foreseen realistic? \n Will the reintegration support be able to meet the various expectations? \n How will the (expected) reintegration support affect the coping strategies of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups? \n What are potential negative effects of reintegration support on social dynamics, power dynamics and social equity issues? \n How can expectations and\/or misinformation concerning reintegration support be managed by the relevant Government and UN agencies, for example, through appropriate communication and risk management?", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -40548,14 +40548,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2 Reintegration support for conflict prevention", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Will the reintegration support be able to meet the various expectations?", + "Sentence": "\n Will the reintegration support be able to meet the various expectations?", "newParagraph": "conflict sensitivity angle important note reintegration support sometimes provided later expected actual level support sometimes lower foreseen example due slow political process logistical constraint andor unavailability delay financing therefore important explicitly raise question possible negative impact waiting reintegration support actual reintegration process excombatants person formerly associated armed force group following question raised soon negotiation planning reintegration support begin n reintegration support foreseen realistic n reintegration support able meet various expectation n expected reintegration support affect coping strategy excombatants person formerly associated armed force group n potential negative effect reintegration support social dynamic power dynamic social equity issue n expectation andor misinformation concerning reintegration support managed relevant government un agency example appropriate communication risk management", "ProcessedSent": "n reintegration support able meet various expectation", "SentID": 2252 }, { "ParagraphID": 724, - "Paragraph": "From a conflict sensitivity angle, it is important to note that reintegration support is sometimes provided later than expected, and that actual levels of support are sometimes lower than foreseen, for example, due to slow political processes, logistical constraints and\/or the unavailability (or delay) of financing. It is therefore important to explicitly raise questions about the possible negative impact of waiting for reintegration support on the actual reintegration processes of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups. The following questions should be raised as soon as the negotiation and planning of reintegration support begins: \\n Is the reintegration support foreseen realistic? \\n Will the reintegration support be able to meet the various expectations? \\n How will the (expected) reintegration support affect the coping strategies of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups? \\n What are potential negative effects of reintegration support on social dynamics, power dynamics and social equity issues? \\n How can expectations and\/or misinformation concerning reintegration support be managed by the relevant Government and UN agencies, for example, through appropriate communication and risk management?", + "Paragraph": "From a conflict sensitivity angle, it is important to note that reintegration support is sometimes provided later than expected, and that actual levels of support are sometimes lower than foreseen, for example, due to slow political processes, logistical constraints and\/or the unavailability (or delay) of financing. It is therefore important to explicitly raise questions about the possible negative impact of waiting for reintegration support on the actual reintegration processes of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups. The following questions should be raised as soon as the negotiation and planning of reintegration support begins: \n Is the reintegration support foreseen realistic? \n Will the reintegration support be able to meet the various expectations? \n How will the (expected) reintegration support affect the coping strategies of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups? \n What are potential negative effects of reintegration support on social dynamics, power dynamics and social equity issues? \n How can expectations and\/or misinformation concerning reintegration support be managed by the relevant Government and UN agencies, for example, through appropriate communication and risk management?", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -40566,14 +40566,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2 Reintegration support for conflict prevention", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n How will the (expected) reintegration support affect the coping strategies of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups?", + "Sentence": "\n How will the (expected) reintegration support affect the coping strategies of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups?", "newParagraph": "conflict sensitivity angle important note reintegration support sometimes provided later expected actual level support sometimes lower foreseen example due slow political process logistical constraint andor unavailability delay financing therefore important explicitly raise question possible negative impact waiting reintegration support actual reintegration process excombatants person formerly associated armed force group following question raised soon negotiation planning reintegration support begin n reintegration support foreseen realistic n reintegration support able meet various expectation n expected reintegration support affect coping strategy excombatants person formerly associated armed force group n potential negative effect reintegration support social dynamic power dynamic social equity issue n expectation andor misinformation concerning reintegration support managed relevant government un agency example appropriate communication risk management", "ProcessedSent": "n expected reintegration support affect coping strategy excombatants person formerly associated armed force group", "SentID": 2253 }, { "ParagraphID": 724, - "Paragraph": "From a conflict sensitivity angle, it is important to note that reintegration support is sometimes provided later than expected, and that actual levels of support are sometimes lower than foreseen, for example, due to slow political processes, logistical constraints and\/or the unavailability (or delay) of financing. It is therefore important to explicitly raise questions about the possible negative impact of waiting for reintegration support on the actual reintegration processes of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups. The following questions should be raised as soon as the negotiation and planning of reintegration support begins: \\n Is the reintegration support foreseen realistic? \\n Will the reintegration support be able to meet the various expectations? \\n How will the (expected) reintegration support affect the coping strategies of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups? \\n What are potential negative effects of reintegration support on social dynamics, power dynamics and social equity issues? \\n How can expectations and\/or misinformation concerning reintegration support be managed by the relevant Government and UN agencies, for example, through appropriate communication and risk management?", + "Paragraph": "From a conflict sensitivity angle, it is important to note that reintegration support is sometimes provided later than expected, and that actual levels of support are sometimes lower than foreseen, for example, due to slow political processes, logistical constraints and\/or the unavailability (or delay) of financing. It is therefore important to explicitly raise questions about the possible negative impact of waiting for reintegration support on the actual reintegration processes of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups. The following questions should be raised as soon as the negotiation and planning of reintegration support begins: \n Is the reintegration support foreseen realistic? \n Will the reintegration support be able to meet the various expectations? \n How will the (expected) reintegration support affect the coping strategies of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups? \n What are potential negative effects of reintegration support on social dynamics, power dynamics and social equity issues? \n How can expectations and\/or misinformation concerning reintegration support be managed by the relevant Government and UN agencies, for example, through appropriate communication and risk management?", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -40584,14 +40584,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2 Reintegration support for conflict prevention", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are potential negative effects of reintegration support on social dynamics, power dynamics and social equity issues?", + "Sentence": "\n What are potential negative effects of reintegration support on social dynamics, power dynamics and social equity issues?", "newParagraph": "conflict sensitivity angle important note reintegration support sometimes provided later expected actual level support sometimes lower foreseen example due slow political process logistical constraint andor unavailability delay financing therefore important explicitly raise question possible negative impact waiting reintegration support actual reintegration process excombatants person formerly associated armed force group following question raised soon negotiation planning reintegration support begin n reintegration support foreseen realistic n reintegration support able meet various expectation n expected reintegration support affect coping strategy excombatants person formerly associated armed force group n potential negative effect reintegration support social dynamic power dynamic social equity issue n expectation andor misinformation concerning reintegration support managed relevant government un agency example appropriate communication risk management", "ProcessedSent": "n potential negative effect reintegration support social dynamic power dynamic social equity issue", "SentID": 2254 }, { "ParagraphID": 724, - "Paragraph": "From a conflict sensitivity angle, it is important to note that reintegration support is sometimes provided later than expected, and that actual levels of support are sometimes lower than foreseen, for example, due to slow political processes, logistical constraints and\/or the unavailability (or delay) of financing. It is therefore important to explicitly raise questions about the possible negative impact of waiting for reintegration support on the actual reintegration processes of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups. The following questions should be raised as soon as the negotiation and planning of reintegration support begins: \\n Is the reintegration support foreseen realistic? \\n Will the reintegration support be able to meet the various expectations? \\n How will the (expected) reintegration support affect the coping strategies of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups? \\n What are potential negative effects of reintegration support on social dynamics, power dynamics and social equity issues? \\n How can expectations and\/or misinformation concerning reintegration support be managed by the relevant Government and UN agencies, for example, through appropriate communication and risk management?", + "Paragraph": "From a conflict sensitivity angle, it is important to note that reintegration support is sometimes provided later than expected, and that actual levels of support are sometimes lower than foreseen, for example, due to slow political processes, logistical constraints and\/or the unavailability (or delay) of financing. It is therefore important to explicitly raise questions about the possible negative impact of waiting for reintegration support on the actual reintegration processes of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups. The following questions should be raised as soon as the negotiation and planning of reintegration support begins: \n Is the reintegration support foreseen realistic? \n Will the reintegration support be able to meet the various expectations? \n How will the (expected) reintegration support affect the coping strategies of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups? \n What are potential negative effects of reintegration support on social dynamics, power dynamics and social equity issues? \n How can expectations and\/or misinformation concerning reintegration support be managed by the relevant Government and UN agencies, for example, through appropriate communication and risk management?", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -40602,7 +40602,7 @@ "Heading2": "5.2 Reintegration support for conflict prevention", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n How can expectations and\/or misinformation concerning reintegration support be managed by the relevant Government and UN agencies, for example, through appropriate communication and risk management?", + "Sentence": "\n How can expectations and\/or misinformation concerning reintegration support be managed by the relevant Government and UN agencies, for example, through appropriate communication and risk management?", "newParagraph": "conflict sensitivity angle important note reintegration support sometimes provided later expected actual level support sometimes lower foreseen example due slow political process logistical constraint andor unavailability delay financing therefore important explicitly raise question possible negative impact waiting reintegration support actual reintegration process excombatants person formerly associated armed force group following question raised soon negotiation planning reintegration support begin n reintegration support foreseen realistic n reintegration support able meet various expectation n expected reintegration support affect coping strategy excombatants person formerly associated armed force group n potential negative effect reintegration support social dynamic power dynamic social equity issue n expectation andor misinformation concerning reintegration support managed relevant government un agency example appropriate communication risk management", "ProcessedSent": "n expectation andor misinformation concerning reintegration support managed relevant government un agency example appropriate communication risk management", "SentID": 2255 @@ -41347,7 +41347,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 738, - "Paragraph": "In summary, the following are key considerations that, in contexts of ongoing conflict, DDR practitioners and others involved in the planning, implementation and evaluation of reintegration programmes should take into account: \\n Conflict and context analysis and assessment will be more challenging to undertake than in post- conflict settings and will need to be frequently updated. \\n There will be increased security risks if ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups: \\n\\n are perceived as traitors by active members of their former group, particularly if the group is still operating in the country, across a nearby border or in the community in which the individual would like to return; \\n\\n become involved in providing information to military or security agencies for the planning of counter-insurgency operations; \\n\\n return to communities still affected by armed conflict and\/or where armed groups operate. \\n Alongside the need for constructive collaboration with military and security agencies, there will be a need to preserve the independence and impartiality of the reintegration programme in order to avoid the perception that the programme is part of the counter-insurgency strategy. \\n The national stakeholders leading reintegration support could have been \u2013 or may still be \u2013 in conflict with the armed groups to which ex-combatants previously belonged. \\n The use of case management is necessary and could include traditional chiefs or religious leaders (imams, bishops, ministers), and trained and supervised providers of mental health services as community supervision officers where appropriate. \\n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with other women, peace and security actors and prevent violence against women and girls. \\n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with programmes aiming to protect children and support the reintegration of children formerly associated with armed forces and groups. More specifically, there is a need to develop common strategies for the prevention of recruitment for youth at risk.", + "Paragraph": "In summary, the following are key considerations that, in contexts of ongoing conflict, DDR practitioners and others involved in the planning, implementation and evaluation of reintegration programmes should take into account: \n Conflict and context analysis and assessment will be more challenging to undertake than in post- conflict settings and will need to be frequently updated. \n There will be increased security risks if ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups: \n\n are perceived as traitors by active members of their former group, particularly if the group is still operating in the country, across a nearby border or in the community in which the individual would like to return; \n\n become involved in providing information to military or security agencies for the planning of counter-insurgency operations; \n\n return to communities still affected by armed conflict and\/or where armed groups operate. \n Alongside the need for constructive collaboration with military and security agencies, there will be a need to preserve the independence and impartiality of the reintegration programme in order to avoid the perception that the programme is part of the counter-insurgency strategy. \n The national stakeholders leading reintegration support could have been \u2013 or may still be \u2013 in conflict with the armed groups to which ex-combatants previously belonged. \n The use of case management is necessary and could include traditional chiefs or religious leaders (imams, bishops, ministers), and trained and supervised providers of mental health services as community supervision officers where appropriate. \n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with other women, peace and security actors and prevent violence against women and girls. \n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with programmes aiming to protect children and support the reintegration of children formerly associated with armed forces and groups. More specifically, there is a need to develop common strategies for the prevention of recruitment for youth at risk.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -41358,14 +41358,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.5 Common challenges in supporting reintegration during conflict", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "In summary, the following are key considerations that, in contexts of ongoing conflict, DDR practitioners and others involved in the planning, implementation and evaluation of reintegration programmes should take into account: \\n Conflict and context analysis and assessment will be more challenging to undertake than in post- conflict settings and will need to be frequently updated.", + "Sentence": "In summary, the following are key considerations that, in contexts of ongoing conflict, DDR practitioners and others involved in the planning, implementation and evaluation of reintegration programmes should take into account: \n Conflict and context analysis and assessment will be more challenging to undertake than in post- conflict settings and will need to be frequently updated.", "newParagraph": "summary following key consideration context ongoing conflict ddr practitioner others involved planning implementation evaluation reintegration programme take account n conflict context analysis assessment challenging undertake post conflict setting need frequently updated n increased security risk excombatants person formerly associated armed force group nn perceived traitor active member former group particularly group still operating country across nearby border community individual would like return nn become involved providing information military security agency planning counterinsurgency operation nn return community still affected armed conflict andor armed group operate n alongside need constructive collaboration military security agency need preserve independence impartiality reintegration programme order avoid perception programme part counterinsurgency strategy n national stakeholder leading reintegration support could may still conflict armed group excombatants previously belonged n use case management necessary could include traditional chief religious leader imam bishop minister trained supervised provider mental health service community supervision officer appropriate n important work closely develop common reintegration strategy woman peace security actor prevent violence woman girl n important work closely develop common reintegration strategy programme aiming protect child support reintegration child formerly associated armed force group specifically need develop common strategy prevention recruitment youth risk", "ProcessedSent": "summary following key consideration context ongoing conflict ddr practitioner others involved planning implementation evaluation reintegration programme take account n conflict context analysis assessment challenging undertake post conflict setting need frequently updated", "SentID": 2297 }, { "ParagraphID": 738, - "Paragraph": "In summary, the following are key considerations that, in contexts of ongoing conflict, DDR practitioners and others involved in the planning, implementation and evaluation of reintegration programmes should take into account: \\n Conflict and context analysis and assessment will be more challenging to undertake than in post- conflict settings and will need to be frequently updated. \\n There will be increased security risks if ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups: \\n\\n are perceived as traitors by active members of their former group, particularly if the group is still operating in the country, across a nearby border or in the community in which the individual would like to return; \\n\\n become involved in providing information to military or security agencies for the planning of counter-insurgency operations; \\n\\n return to communities still affected by armed conflict and\/or where armed groups operate. \\n Alongside the need for constructive collaboration with military and security agencies, there will be a need to preserve the independence and impartiality of the reintegration programme in order to avoid the perception that the programme is part of the counter-insurgency strategy. \\n The national stakeholders leading reintegration support could have been \u2013 or may still be \u2013 in conflict with the armed groups to which ex-combatants previously belonged. \\n The use of case management is necessary and could include traditional chiefs or religious leaders (imams, bishops, ministers), and trained and supervised providers of mental health services as community supervision officers where appropriate. \\n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with other women, peace and security actors and prevent violence against women and girls. \\n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with programmes aiming to protect children and support the reintegration of children formerly associated with armed forces and groups. More specifically, there is a need to develop common strategies for the prevention of recruitment for youth at risk.", + "Paragraph": "In summary, the following are key considerations that, in contexts of ongoing conflict, DDR practitioners and others involved in the planning, implementation and evaluation of reintegration programmes should take into account: \n Conflict and context analysis and assessment will be more challenging to undertake than in post- conflict settings and will need to be frequently updated. \n There will be increased security risks if ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups: \n\n are perceived as traitors by active members of their former group, particularly if the group is still operating in the country, across a nearby border or in the community in which the individual would like to return; \n\n become involved in providing information to military or security agencies for the planning of counter-insurgency operations; \n\n return to communities still affected by armed conflict and\/or where armed groups operate. \n Alongside the need for constructive collaboration with military and security agencies, there will be a need to preserve the independence and impartiality of the reintegration programme in order to avoid the perception that the programme is part of the counter-insurgency strategy. \n The national stakeholders leading reintegration support could have been \u2013 or may still be \u2013 in conflict with the armed groups to which ex-combatants previously belonged. \n The use of case management is necessary and could include traditional chiefs or religious leaders (imams, bishops, ministers), and trained and supervised providers of mental health services as community supervision officers where appropriate. \n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with other women, peace and security actors and prevent violence against women and girls. \n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with programmes aiming to protect children and support the reintegration of children formerly associated with armed forces and groups. More specifically, there is a need to develop common strategies for the prevention of recruitment for youth at risk.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -41376,14 +41376,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.5 Common challenges in supporting reintegration during conflict", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n There will be increased security risks if ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups: \\n\\n are perceived as traitors by active members of their former group, particularly if the group is still operating in the country, across a nearby border or in the community in which the individual would like to return; \\n\\n become involved in providing information to military or security agencies for the planning of counter-insurgency operations; \\n\\n return to communities still affected by armed conflict and\/or where armed groups operate.", + "Sentence": "\n There will be increased security risks if ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups: \n\n are perceived as traitors by active members of their former group, particularly if the group is still operating in the country, across a nearby border or in the community in which the individual would like to return; \n\n become involved in providing information to military or security agencies for the planning of counter-insurgency operations; \n\n return to communities still affected by armed conflict and\/or where armed groups operate.", "newParagraph": "summary following key consideration context ongoing conflict ddr practitioner others involved planning implementation evaluation reintegration programme take account n conflict context analysis assessment challenging undertake post conflict setting need frequently updated n increased security risk excombatants person formerly associated armed force group nn perceived traitor active member former group particularly group still operating country across nearby border community individual would like return nn become involved providing information military security agency planning counterinsurgency operation nn return community still affected armed conflict andor armed group operate n alongside need constructive collaboration military security agency need preserve independence impartiality reintegration programme order avoid perception programme part counterinsurgency strategy n national stakeholder leading reintegration support could may still conflict armed group excombatants previously belonged n use case management necessary could include traditional chief religious leader imam bishop minister trained supervised provider mental health service community supervision officer appropriate n important work closely develop common reintegration strategy woman peace security actor prevent violence woman girl n important work closely develop common reintegration strategy programme aiming protect child support reintegration child formerly associated armed force group specifically need develop common strategy prevention recruitment youth risk", "ProcessedSent": "n increased security risk excombatants person formerly associated armed force group nn perceived traitor active member former group particularly group still operating country across nearby border community individual would like return nn become involved providing information military security agency planning counterinsurgency operation nn return community still affected armed conflict andor armed group operate", "SentID": 2298 }, { "ParagraphID": 738, - "Paragraph": "In summary, the following are key considerations that, in contexts of ongoing conflict, DDR practitioners and others involved in the planning, implementation and evaluation of reintegration programmes should take into account: \\n Conflict and context analysis and assessment will be more challenging to undertake than in post- conflict settings and will need to be frequently updated. \\n There will be increased security risks if ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups: \\n\\n are perceived as traitors by active members of their former group, particularly if the group is still operating in the country, across a nearby border or in the community in which the individual would like to return; \\n\\n become involved in providing information to military or security agencies for the planning of counter-insurgency operations; \\n\\n return to communities still affected by armed conflict and\/or where armed groups operate. \\n Alongside the need for constructive collaboration with military and security agencies, there will be a need to preserve the independence and impartiality of the reintegration programme in order to avoid the perception that the programme is part of the counter-insurgency strategy. \\n The national stakeholders leading reintegration support could have been \u2013 or may still be \u2013 in conflict with the armed groups to which ex-combatants previously belonged. \\n The use of case management is necessary and could include traditional chiefs or religious leaders (imams, bishops, ministers), and trained and supervised providers of mental health services as community supervision officers where appropriate. \\n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with other women, peace and security actors and prevent violence against women and girls. \\n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with programmes aiming to protect children and support the reintegration of children formerly associated with armed forces and groups. More specifically, there is a need to develop common strategies for the prevention of recruitment for youth at risk.", + "Paragraph": "In summary, the following are key considerations that, in contexts of ongoing conflict, DDR practitioners and others involved in the planning, implementation and evaluation of reintegration programmes should take into account: \n Conflict and context analysis and assessment will be more challenging to undertake than in post- conflict settings and will need to be frequently updated. \n There will be increased security risks if ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups: \n\n are perceived as traitors by active members of their former group, particularly if the group is still operating in the country, across a nearby border or in the community in which the individual would like to return; \n\n become involved in providing information to military or security agencies for the planning of counter-insurgency operations; \n\n return to communities still affected by armed conflict and\/or where armed groups operate. \n Alongside the need for constructive collaboration with military and security agencies, there will be a need to preserve the independence and impartiality of the reintegration programme in order to avoid the perception that the programme is part of the counter-insurgency strategy. \n The national stakeholders leading reintegration support could have been \u2013 or may still be \u2013 in conflict with the armed groups to which ex-combatants previously belonged. \n The use of case management is necessary and could include traditional chiefs or religious leaders (imams, bishops, ministers), and trained and supervised providers of mental health services as community supervision officers where appropriate. \n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with other women, peace and security actors and prevent violence against women and girls. \n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with programmes aiming to protect children and support the reintegration of children formerly associated with armed forces and groups. More specifically, there is a need to develop common strategies for the prevention of recruitment for youth at risk.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -41394,14 +41394,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.5 Common challenges in supporting reintegration during conflict", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Alongside the need for constructive collaboration with military and security agencies, there will be a need to preserve the independence and impartiality of the reintegration programme in order to avoid the perception that the programme is part of the counter-insurgency strategy.", + "Sentence": "\n Alongside the need for constructive collaboration with military and security agencies, there will be a need to preserve the independence and impartiality of the reintegration programme in order to avoid the perception that the programme is part of the counter-insurgency strategy.", "newParagraph": "summary following key consideration context ongoing conflict ddr practitioner others involved planning implementation evaluation reintegration programme take account n conflict context analysis assessment challenging undertake post conflict setting need frequently updated n increased security risk excombatants person formerly associated armed force group nn perceived traitor active member former group particularly group still operating country across nearby border community individual would like return nn become involved providing information military security agency planning counterinsurgency operation nn return community still affected armed conflict andor armed group operate n alongside need constructive collaboration military security agency need preserve independence impartiality reintegration programme order avoid perception programme part counterinsurgency strategy n national stakeholder leading reintegration support could may still conflict armed group excombatants previously belonged n use case management necessary could include traditional chief religious leader imam bishop minister trained supervised provider mental health service community supervision officer appropriate n important work closely develop common reintegration strategy woman peace security actor prevent violence woman girl n important work closely develop common reintegration strategy programme aiming protect child support reintegration child formerly associated armed force group specifically need develop common strategy prevention recruitment youth risk", "ProcessedSent": "n alongside need constructive collaboration military security agency need preserve independence impartiality reintegration programme order avoid perception programme part counterinsurgency strategy", "SentID": 2299 }, { "ParagraphID": 738, - "Paragraph": "In summary, the following are key considerations that, in contexts of ongoing conflict, DDR practitioners and others involved in the planning, implementation and evaluation of reintegration programmes should take into account: \\n Conflict and context analysis and assessment will be more challenging to undertake than in post- conflict settings and will need to be frequently updated. \\n There will be increased security risks if ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups: \\n\\n are perceived as traitors by active members of their former group, particularly if the group is still operating in the country, across a nearby border or in the community in which the individual would like to return; \\n\\n become involved in providing information to military or security agencies for the planning of counter-insurgency operations; \\n\\n return to communities still affected by armed conflict and\/or where armed groups operate. \\n Alongside the need for constructive collaboration with military and security agencies, there will be a need to preserve the independence and impartiality of the reintegration programme in order to avoid the perception that the programme is part of the counter-insurgency strategy. \\n The national stakeholders leading reintegration support could have been \u2013 or may still be \u2013 in conflict with the armed groups to which ex-combatants previously belonged. \\n The use of case management is necessary and could include traditional chiefs or religious leaders (imams, bishops, ministers), and trained and supervised providers of mental health services as community supervision officers where appropriate. \\n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with other women, peace and security actors and prevent violence against women and girls. \\n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with programmes aiming to protect children and support the reintegration of children formerly associated with armed forces and groups. More specifically, there is a need to develop common strategies for the prevention of recruitment for youth at risk.", + "Paragraph": "In summary, the following are key considerations that, in contexts of ongoing conflict, DDR practitioners and others involved in the planning, implementation and evaluation of reintegration programmes should take into account: \n Conflict and context analysis and assessment will be more challenging to undertake than in post- conflict settings and will need to be frequently updated. \n There will be increased security risks if ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups: \n\n are perceived as traitors by active members of their former group, particularly if the group is still operating in the country, across a nearby border or in the community in which the individual would like to return; \n\n become involved in providing information to military or security agencies for the planning of counter-insurgency operations; \n\n return to communities still affected by armed conflict and\/or where armed groups operate. \n Alongside the need for constructive collaboration with military and security agencies, there will be a need to preserve the independence and impartiality of the reintegration programme in order to avoid the perception that the programme is part of the counter-insurgency strategy. \n The national stakeholders leading reintegration support could have been \u2013 or may still be \u2013 in conflict with the armed groups to which ex-combatants previously belonged. \n The use of case management is necessary and could include traditional chiefs or religious leaders (imams, bishops, ministers), and trained and supervised providers of mental health services as community supervision officers where appropriate. \n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with other women, peace and security actors and prevent violence against women and girls. \n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with programmes aiming to protect children and support the reintegration of children formerly associated with armed forces and groups. More specifically, there is a need to develop common strategies for the prevention of recruitment for youth at risk.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -41412,14 +41412,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.5 Common challenges in supporting reintegration during conflict", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The national stakeholders leading reintegration support could have been \u2013 or may still be \u2013 in conflict with the armed groups to which ex-combatants previously belonged.", + "Sentence": "\n The national stakeholders leading reintegration support could have been \u2013 or may still be \u2013 in conflict with the armed groups to which ex-combatants previously belonged.", "newParagraph": "summary following key consideration context ongoing conflict ddr practitioner others involved planning implementation evaluation reintegration programme take account n conflict context analysis assessment challenging undertake post conflict setting need frequently updated n increased security risk excombatants person formerly associated armed force group nn perceived traitor active member former group particularly group still operating country across nearby border community individual would like return nn become involved providing information military security agency planning counterinsurgency operation nn return community still affected armed conflict andor armed group operate n alongside need constructive collaboration military security agency need preserve independence impartiality reintegration programme order avoid perception programme part counterinsurgency strategy n national stakeholder leading reintegration support could may still conflict armed group excombatants previously belonged n use case management necessary could include traditional chief religious leader imam bishop minister trained supervised provider mental health service community supervision officer appropriate n important work closely develop common reintegration strategy woman peace security actor prevent violence woman girl n important work closely develop common reintegration strategy programme aiming protect child support reintegration child formerly associated armed force group specifically need develop common strategy prevention recruitment youth risk", "ProcessedSent": "n national stakeholder leading reintegration support could may still conflict armed group excombatants previously belonged", "SentID": 2300 }, { "ParagraphID": 738, - "Paragraph": "In summary, the following are key considerations that, in contexts of ongoing conflict, DDR practitioners and others involved in the planning, implementation and evaluation of reintegration programmes should take into account: \\n Conflict and context analysis and assessment will be more challenging to undertake than in post- conflict settings and will need to be frequently updated. \\n There will be increased security risks if ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups: \\n\\n are perceived as traitors by active members of their former group, particularly if the group is still operating in the country, across a nearby border or in the community in which the individual would like to return; \\n\\n become involved in providing information to military or security agencies for the planning of counter-insurgency operations; \\n\\n return to communities still affected by armed conflict and\/or where armed groups operate. \\n Alongside the need for constructive collaboration with military and security agencies, there will be a need to preserve the independence and impartiality of the reintegration programme in order to avoid the perception that the programme is part of the counter-insurgency strategy. \\n The national stakeholders leading reintegration support could have been \u2013 or may still be \u2013 in conflict with the armed groups to which ex-combatants previously belonged. \\n The use of case management is necessary and could include traditional chiefs or religious leaders (imams, bishops, ministers), and trained and supervised providers of mental health services as community supervision officers where appropriate. \\n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with other women, peace and security actors and prevent violence against women and girls. \\n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with programmes aiming to protect children and support the reintegration of children formerly associated with armed forces and groups. More specifically, there is a need to develop common strategies for the prevention of recruitment for youth at risk.", + "Paragraph": "In summary, the following are key considerations that, in contexts of ongoing conflict, DDR practitioners and others involved in the planning, implementation and evaluation of reintegration programmes should take into account: \n Conflict and context analysis and assessment will be more challenging to undertake than in post- conflict settings and will need to be frequently updated. \n There will be increased security risks if ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups: \n\n are perceived as traitors by active members of their former group, particularly if the group is still operating in the country, across a nearby border or in the community in which the individual would like to return; \n\n become involved in providing information to military or security agencies for the planning of counter-insurgency operations; \n\n return to communities still affected by armed conflict and\/or where armed groups operate. \n Alongside the need for constructive collaboration with military and security agencies, there will be a need to preserve the independence and impartiality of the reintegration programme in order to avoid the perception that the programme is part of the counter-insurgency strategy. \n The national stakeholders leading reintegration support could have been \u2013 or may still be \u2013 in conflict with the armed groups to which ex-combatants previously belonged. \n The use of case management is necessary and could include traditional chiefs or religious leaders (imams, bishops, ministers), and trained and supervised providers of mental health services as community supervision officers where appropriate. \n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with other women, peace and security actors and prevent violence against women and girls. \n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with programmes aiming to protect children and support the reintegration of children formerly associated with armed forces and groups. More specifically, there is a need to develop common strategies for the prevention of recruitment for youth at risk.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -41430,14 +41430,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.5 Common challenges in supporting reintegration during conflict", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The use of case management is necessary and could include traditional chiefs or religious leaders (imams, bishops, ministers), and trained and supervised providers of mental health services as community supervision officers where appropriate.", + "Sentence": "\n The use of case management is necessary and could include traditional chiefs or religious leaders (imams, bishops, ministers), and trained and supervised providers of mental health services as community supervision officers where appropriate.", "newParagraph": "summary following key consideration context ongoing conflict ddr practitioner others involved planning implementation evaluation reintegration programme take account n conflict context analysis assessment challenging undertake post conflict setting need frequently updated n increased security risk excombatants person formerly associated armed force group nn perceived traitor active member former group particularly group still operating country across nearby border community individual would like return nn become involved providing information military security agency planning counterinsurgency operation nn return community still affected armed conflict andor armed group operate n alongside need constructive collaboration military security agency need preserve independence impartiality reintegration programme order avoid perception programme part counterinsurgency strategy n national stakeholder leading reintegration support could may still conflict armed group excombatants previously belonged n use case management necessary could include traditional chief religious leader imam bishop minister trained supervised provider mental health service community supervision officer appropriate n important work closely develop common reintegration strategy woman peace security actor prevent violence woman girl n important work closely develop common reintegration strategy programme aiming protect child support reintegration child formerly associated armed force group specifically need develop common strategy prevention recruitment youth risk", "ProcessedSent": "n use case management necessary could include traditional chief religious leader imam bishop minister trained supervised provider mental health service community supervision officer appropriate", "SentID": 2301 }, { "ParagraphID": 738, - "Paragraph": "In summary, the following are key considerations that, in contexts of ongoing conflict, DDR practitioners and others involved in the planning, implementation and evaluation of reintegration programmes should take into account: \\n Conflict and context analysis and assessment will be more challenging to undertake than in post- conflict settings and will need to be frequently updated. \\n There will be increased security risks if ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups: \\n\\n are perceived as traitors by active members of their former group, particularly if the group is still operating in the country, across a nearby border or in the community in which the individual would like to return; \\n\\n become involved in providing information to military or security agencies for the planning of counter-insurgency operations; \\n\\n return to communities still affected by armed conflict and\/or where armed groups operate. \\n Alongside the need for constructive collaboration with military and security agencies, there will be a need to preserve the independence and impartiality of the reintegration programme in order to avoid the perception that the programme is part of the counter-insurgency strategy. \\n The national stakeholders leading reintegration support could have been \u2013 or may still be \u2013 in conflict with the armed groups to which ex-combatants previously belonged. \\n The use of case management is necessary and could include traditional chiefs or religious leaders (imams, bishops, ministers), and trained and supervised providers of mental health services as community supervision officers where appropriate. \\n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with other women, peace and security actors and prevent violence against women and girls. \\n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with programmes aiming to protect children and support the reintegration of children formerly associated with armed forces and groups. More specifically, there is a need to develop common strategies for the prevention of recruitment for youth at risk.", + "Paragraph": "In summary, the following are key considerations that, in contexts of ongoing conflict, DDR practitioners and others involved in the planning, implementation and evaluation of reintegration programmes should take into account: \n Conflict and context analysis and assessment will be more challenging to undertake than in post- conflict settings and will need to be frequently updated. \n There will be increased security risks if ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups: \n\n are perceived as traitors by active members of their former group, particularly if the group is still operating in the country, across a nearby border or in the community in which the individual would like to return; \n\n become involved in providing information to military or security agencies for the planning of counter-insurgency operations; \n\n return to communities still affected by armed conflict and\/or where armed groups operate. \n Alongside the need for constructive collaboration with military and security agencies, there will be a need to preserve the independence and impartiality of the reintegration programme in order to avoid the perception that the programme is part of the counter-insurgency strategy. \n The national stakeholders leading reintegration support could have been \u2013 or may still be \u2013 in conflict with the armed groups to which ex-combatants previously belonged. \n The use of case management is necessary and could include traditional chiefs or religious leaders (imams, bishops, ministers), and trained and supervised providers of mental health services as community supervision officers where appropriate. \n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with other women, peace and security actors and prevent violence against women and girls. \n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with programmes aiming to protect children and support the reintegration of children formerly associated with armed forces and groups. More specifically, there is a need to develop common strategies for the prevention of recruitment for youth at risk.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -41448,14 +41448,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.5 Common challenges in supporting reintegration during conflict", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with other women, peace and security actors and prevent violence against women and girls.", + "Sentence": "\n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with other women, peace and security actors and prevent violence against women and girls.", "newParagraph": "summary following key consideration context ongoing conflict ddr practitioner others involved planning implementation evaluation reintegration programme take account n conflict context analysis assessment challenging undertake post conflict setting need frequently updated n increased security risk excombatants person formerly associated armed force group nn perceived traitor active member former group particularly group still operating country across nearby border community individual would like return nn become involved providing information military security agency planning counterinsurgency operation nn return community still affected armed conflict andor armed group operate n alongside need constructive collaboration military security agency need preserve independence impartiality reintegration programme order avoid perception programme part counterinsurgency strategy n national stakeholder leading reintegration support could may still conflict armed group excombatants previously belonged n use case management necessary could include traditional chief religious leader imam bishop minister trained supervised provider mental health service community supervision officer appropriate n important work closely develop common reintegration strategy woman peace security actor prevent violence woman girl n important work closely develop common reintegration strategy programme aiming protect child support reintegration child formerly associated armed force group specifically need develop common strategy prevention recruitment youth risk", "ProcessedSent": "n important work closely develop common reintegration strategy woman peace security actor prevent violence woman girl", "SentID": 2302 }, { "ParagraphID": 738, - "Paragraph": "In summary, the following are key considerations that, in contexts of ongoing conflict, DDR practitioners and others involved in the planning, implementation and evaluation of reintegration programmes should take into account: \\n Conflict and context analysis and assessment will be more challenging to undertake than in post- conflict settings and will need to be frequently updated. \\n There will be increased security risks if ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups: \\n\\n are perceived as traitors by active members of their former group, particularly if the group is still operating in the country, across a nearby border or in the community in which the individual would like to return; \\n\\n become involved in providing information to military or security agencies for the planning of counter-insurgency operations; \\n\\n return to communities still affected by armed conflict and\/or where armed groups operate. \\n Alongside the need for constructive collaboration with military and security agencies, there will be a need to preserve the independence and impartiality of the reintegration programme in order to avoid the perception that the programme is part of the counter-insurgency strategy. \\n The national stakeholders leading reintegration support could have been \u2013 or may still be \u2013 in conflict with the armed groups to which ex-combatants previously belonged. \\n The use of case management is necessary and could include traditional chiefs or religious leaders (imams, bishops, ministers), and trained and supervised providers of mental health services as community supervision officers where appropriate. \\n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with other women, peace and security actors and prevent violence against women and girls. \\n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with programmes aiming to protect children and support the reintegration of children formerly associated with armed forces and groups. More specifically, there is a need to develop common strategies for the prevention of recruitment for youth at risk.", + "Paragraph": "In summary, the following are key considerations that, in contexts of ongoing conflict, DDR practitioners and others involved in the planning, implementation and evaluation of reintegration programmes should take into account: \n Conflict and context analysis and assessment will be more challenging to undertake than in post- conflict settings and will need to be frequently updated. \n There will be increased security risks if ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups: \n\n are perceived as traitors by active members of their former group, particularly if the group is still operating in the country, across a nearby border or in the community in which the individual would like to return; \n\n become involved in providing information to military or security agencies for the planning of counter-insurgency operations; \n\n return to communities still affected by armed conflict and\/or where armed groups operate. \n Alongside the need for constructive collaboration with military and security agencies, there will be a need to preserve the independence and impartiality of the reintegration programme in order to avoid the perception that the programme is part of the counter-insurgency strategy. \n The national stakeholders leading reintegration support could have been \u2013 or may still be \u2013 in conflict with the armed groups to which ex-combatants previously belonged. \n The use of case management is necessary and could include traditional chiefs or religious leaders (imams, bishops, ministers), and trained and supervised providers of mental health services as community supervision officers where appropriate. \n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with other women, peace and security actors and prevent violence against women and girls. \n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with programmes aiming to protect children and support the reintegration of children formerly associated with armed forces and groups. More specifically, there is a need to develop common strategies for the prevention of recruitment for youth at risk.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -41466,14 +41466,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.5 Common challenges in supporting reintegration during conflict", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with programmes aiming to protect children and support the reintegration of children formerly associated with armed forces and groups.", + "Sentence": "\n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with programmes aiming to protect children and support the reintegration of children formerly associated with armed forces and groups.", "newParagraph": "summary following key consideration context ongoing conflict ddr practitioner others involved planning implementation evaluation reintegration programme take account n conflict context analysis assessment challenging undertake post conflict setting need frequently updated n increased security risk excombatants person formerly associated armed force group nn perceived traitor active member former group particularly group still operating country across nearby border community individual would like return nn become involved providing information military security agency planning counterinsurgency operation nn return community still affected armed conflict andor armed group operate n alongside need constructive collaboration military security agency need preserve independence impartiality reintegration programme order avoid perception programme part counterinsurgency strategy n national stakeholder leading reintegration support could may still conflict armed group excombatants previously belonged n use case management necessary could include traditional chief religious leader imam bishop minister trained supervised provider mental health service community supervision officer appropriate n important work closely develop common reintegration strategy woman peace security actor prevent violence woman girl n important work closely develop common reintegration strategy programme aiming protect child support reintegration child formerly associated armed force group specifically need develop common strategy prevention recruitment youth risk", "ProcessedSent": "n important work closely develop common reintegration strategy programme aiming protect child support reintegration child formerly associated armed force group", "SentID": 2303 }, { "ParagraphID": 738, - "Paragraph": "In summary, the following are key considerations that, in contexts of ongoing conflict, DDR practitioners and others involved in the planning, implementation and evaluation of reintegration programmes should take into account: \\n Conflict and context analysis and assessment will be more challenging to undertake than in post- conflict settings and will need to be frequently updated. \\n There will be increased security risks if ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups: \\n\\n are perceived as traitors by active members of their former group, particularly if the group is still operating in the country, across a nearby border or in the community in which the individual would like to return; \\n\\n become involved in providing information to military or security agencies for the planning of counter-insurgency operations; \\n\\n return to communities still affected by armed conflict and\/or where armed groups operate. \\n Alongside the need for constructive collaboration with military and security agencies, there will be a need to preserve the independence and impartiality of the reintegration programme in order to avoid the perception that the programme is part of the counter-insurgency strategy. \\n The national stakeholders leading reintegration support could have been \u2013 or may still be \u2013 in conflict with the armed groups to which ex-combatants previously belonged. \\n The use of case management is necessary and could include traditional chiefs or religious leaders (imams, bishops, ministers), and trained and supervised providers of mental health services as community supervision officers where appropriate. \\n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with other women, peace and security actors and prevent violence against women and girls. \\n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with programmes aiming to protect children and support the reintegration of children formerly associated with armed forces and groups. More specifically, there is a need to develop common strategies for the prevention of recruitment for youth at risk.", + "Paragraph": "In summary, the following are key considerations that, in contexts of ongoing conflict, DDR practitioners and others involved in the planning, implementation and evaluation of reintegration programmes should take into account: \n Conflict and context analysis and assessment will be more challenging to undertake than in post- conflict settings and will need to be frequently updated. \n There will be increased security risks if ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups: \n\n are perceived as traitors by active members of their former group, particularly if the group is still operating in the country, across a nearby border or in the community in which the individual would like to return; \n\n become involved in providing information to military or security agencies for the planning of counter-insurgency operations; \n\n return to communities still affected by armed conflict and\/or where armed groups operate. \n Alongside the need for constructive collaboration with military and security agencies, there will be a need to preserve the independence and impartiality of the reintegration programme in order to avoid the perception that the programme is part of the counter-insurgency strategy. \n The national stakeholders leading reintegration support could have been \u2013 or may still be \u2013 in conflict with the armed groups to which ex-combatants previously belonged. \n The use of case management is necessary and could include traditional chiefs or religious leaders (imams, bishops, ministers), and trained and supervised providers of mental health services as community supervision officers where appropriate. \n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with other women, peace and security actors and prevent violence against women and girls. \n It is important to work closely with and develop common reintegration strategies with programmes aiming to protect children and support the reintegration of children formerly associated with armed forces and groups. More specifically, there is a need to develop common strategies for the prevention of recruitment for youth at risk.", "Color": "#008DCA", "Level": 2, "LevelName": "Concepts, Policy and Strategy of the IDDRS", @@ -41671,7 +41671,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 742, - "Paragraph": "The planning process and requirements given in this module are intended to serve as a general guide. A number of factors will affect the various planning processes, including: \\n The pace and duration of a peace process: A drawn-out peace process gives the UN, and the international community generally, more time to consult, plan and develop pro- grammes for later implementation (the Sudanese peace process is a good example); \\n Contextual and local realities: The dynamics and consequences of conflict; the attitudes of the actors and other parties associated with it; and post-conflict social, economic and institutional capacities will affect planning for DDR, and have an impact on the strategic orientation of UN support; \\n National capacities for DDR: The extent of pre-existing national and institutional capacities in the conflict-affected country to plan and implement DDR will considerably affect the nature of UN support and, consequently, planning requirements. Planning for DDR in contexts with weak or non-existent national institutions will differ greatly from planning DDR in contexts with stable and effective national institutions; \\n The role of the UN: How the role of the UN is defined in general terms, and for DDR specifically, will depend on the extent of responsibility and direct involvement assumed by national actors, and the UN\u2019s own capacity to complement and support these efforts. This role definition will directly influence the scope and nature of the UN\u2019s engagement in DDR, and hence requirements for planning; \\n Interaction with other international and regional actors: The presence and need to collaborate with international or regional actors (e.g., the European Union, NATO, the African Union, the Economic Community of West African States) with a current or potential role in the management of the conflict will affect the general planning process.", + "Paragraph": "The planning process and requirements given in this module are intended to serve as a general guide. A number of factors will affect the various planning processes, including: \n The pace and duration of a peace process: A drawn-out peace process gives the UN, and the international community generally, more time to consult, plan and develop pro- grammes for later implementation (the Sudanese peace process is a good example); \n Contextual and local realities: The dynamics and consequences of conflict; the attitudes of the actors and other parties associated with it; and post-conflict social, economic and institutional capacities will affect planning for DDR, and have an impact on the strategic orientation of UN support; \n National capacities for DDR: The extent of pre-existing national and institutional capacities in the conflict-affected country to plan and implement DDR will considerably affect the nature of UN support and, consequently, planning requirements. Planning for DDR in contexts with weak or non-existent national institutions will differ greatly from planning DDR in contexts with stable and effective national institutions; \n The role of the UN: How the role of the UN is defined in general terms, and for DDR specifically, will depend on the extent of responsibility and direct involvement assumed by national actors, and the UN\u2019s own capacity to complement and support these efforts. This role definition will directly influence the scope and nature of the UN\u2019s engagement in DDR, and hence requirements for planning; \n Interaction with other international and regional actors: The presence and need to collaborate with international or regional actors (e.g., the European Union, NATO, the African Union, the Economic Community of West African States) with a current or potential role in the management of the conflict will affect the general planning process.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -41689,7 +41689,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 742, - "Paragraph": "The planning process and requirements given in this module are intended to serve as a general guide. A number of factors will affect the various planning processes, including: \\n The pace and duration of a peace process: A drawn-out peace process gives the UN, and the international community generally, more time to consult, plan and develop pro- grammes for later implementation (the Sudanese peace process is a good example); \\n Contextual and local realities: The dynamics and consequences of conflict; the attitudes of the actors and other parties associated with it; and post-conflict social, economic and institutional capacities will affect planning for DDR, and have an impact on the strategic orientation of UN support; \\n National capacities for DDR: The extent of pre-existing national and institutional capacities in the conflict-affected country to plan and implement DDR will considerably affect the nature of UN support and, consequently, planning requirements. Planning for DDR in contexts with weak or non-existent national institutions will differ greatly from planning DDR in contexts with stable and effective national institutions; \\n The role of the UN: How the role of the UN is defined in general terms, and for DDR specifically, will depend on the extent of responsibility and direct involvement assumed by national actors, and the UN\u2019s own capacity to complement and support these efforts. This role definition will directly influence the scope and nature of the UN\u2019s engagement in DDR, and hence requirements for planning; \\n Interaction with other international and regional actors: The presence and need to collaborate with international or regional actors (e.g., the European Union, NATO, the African Union, the Economic Community of West African States) with a current or potential role in the management of the conflict will affect the general planning process.", + "Paragraph": "The planning process and requirements given in this module are intended to serve as a general guide. A number of factors will affect the various planning processes, including: \n The pace and duration of a peace process: A drawn-out peace process gives the UN, and the international community generally, more time to consult, plan and develop pro- grammes for later implementation (the Sudanese peace process is a good example); \n Contextual and local realities: The dynamics and consequences of conflict; the attitudes of the actors and other parties associated with it; and post-conflict social, economic and institutional capacities will affect planning for DDR, and have an impact on the strategic orientation of UN support; \n National capacities for DDR: The extent of pre-existing national and institutional capacities in the conflict-affected country to plan and implement DDR will considerably affect the nature of UN support and, consequently, planning requirements. Planning for DDR in contexts with weak or non-existent national institutions will differ greatly from planning DDR in contexts with stable and effective national institutions; \n The role of the UN: How the role of the UN is defined in general terms, and for DDR specifically, will depend on the extent of responsibility and direct involvement assumed by national actors, and the UN\u2019s own capacity to complement and support these efforts. This role definition will directly influence the scope and nature of the UN\u2019s engagement in DDR, and hence requirements for planning; \n Interaction with other international and regional actors: The presence and need to collaborate with international or regional actors (e.g., the European Union, NATO, the African Union, the Economic Community of West African States) with a current or potential role in the management of the conflict will affect the general planning process.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -41700,14 +41700,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "A number of factors will affect the various planning processes, including: \\n The pace and duration of a peace process: A drawn-out peace process gives the UN, and the international community generally, more time to consult, plan and develop pro- grammes for later implementation (the Sudanese peace process is a good example); \\n Contextual and local realities: The dynamics and consequences of conflict; the attitudes of the actors and other parties associated with it; and post-conflict social, economic and institutional capacities will affect planning for DDR, and have an impact on the strategic orientation of UN support; \\n National capacities for DDR: The extent of pre-existing national and institutional capacities in the conflict-affected country to plan and implement DDR will considerably affect the nature of UN support and, consequently, planning requirements.", + "Sentence": "A number of factors will affect the various planning processes, including: \n The pace and duration of a peace process: A drawn-out peace process gives the UN, and the international community generally, more time to consult, plan and develop pro- grammes for later implementation (the Sudanese peace process is a good example); \n Contextual and local realities: The dynamics and consequences of conflict; the attitudes of the actors and other parties associated with it; and post-conflict social, economic and institutional capacities will affect planning for DDR, and have an impact on the strategic orientation of UN support; \n National capacities for DDR: The extent of pre-existing national and institutional capacities in the conflict-affected country to plan and implement DDR will considerably affect the nature of UN support and, consequently, planning requirements.", "newParagraph": "planning process requirement given module intended serve general guide number factor affect various planning process including n pace duration peace process drawnout peace process give un international community generally time consult plan develop pro gramme later implementation sudanese peace process good example n contextual local reality dynamic consequence conflict attitude actor party associated postconflict social economic institutional capacity affect planning ddr impact strategic orientation un support n national capacity ddr extent preexisting national institutional capacity conflictaffected country plan implement ddr considerably affect nature un support consequently planning requirement planning ddr context weak nonexistent national institution differ greatly planning ddr context stable effective national institution n role un role un defined general term ddr specifically depend extent responsibility direct involvement assumed national actor un capacity complement support effort role definition directly influence scope nature un engagement ddr hence requirement planning n interaction international regional actor presence need collaborate international regional actor eg european union nato african union economic community west african state current potential role management conflict affect general planning process", "ProcessedSent": "number factor affect various planning process including n pace duration peace process drawnout peace process give un international community generally time consult plan develop pro gramme later implementation sudanese peace process good example n contextual local reality dynamic consequence conflict attitude actor party associated postconflict social economic institutional capacity affect planning ddr impact strategic orientation un support n national capacity ddr extent preexisting national institutional capacity conflictaffected country plan implement ddr considerably affect nature un support consequently planning requirement", "SentID": 2316 }, { "ParagraphID": 742, - "Paragraph": "The planning process and requirements given in this module are intended to serve as a general guide. A number of factors will affect the various planning processes, including: \\n The pace and duration of a peace process: A drawn-out peace process gives the UN, and the international community generally, more time to consult, plan and develop pro- grammes for later implementation (the Sudanese peace process is a good example); \\n Contextual and local realities: The dynamics and consequences of conflict; the attitudes of the actors and other parties associated with it; and post-conflict social, economic and institutional capacities will affect planning for DDR, and have an impact on the strategic orientation of UN support; \\n National capacities for DDR: The extent of pre-existing national and institutional capacities in the conflict-affected country to plan and implement DDR will considerably affect the nature of UN support and, consequently, planning requirements. Planning for DDR in contexts with weak or non-existent national institutions will differ greatly from planning DDR in contexts with stable and effective national institutions; \\n The role of the UN: How the role of the UN is defined in general terms, and for DDR specifically, will depend on the extent of responsibility and direct involvement assumed by national actors, and the UN\u2019s own capacity to complement and support these efforts. This role definition will directly influence the scope and nature of the UN\u2019s engagement in DDR, and hence requirements for planning; \\n Interaction with other international and regional actors: The presence and need to collaborate with international or regional actors (e.g., the European Union, NATO, the African Union, the Economic Community of West African States) with a current or potential role in the management of the conflict will affect the general planning process.", + "Paragraph": "The planning process and requirements given in this module are intended to serve as a general guide. A number of factors will affect the various planning processes, including: \n The pace and duration of a peace process: A drawn-out peace process gives the UN, and the international community generally, more time to consult, plan and develop pro- grammes for later implementation (the Sudanese peace process is a good example); \n Contextual and local realities: The dynamics and consequences of conflict; the attitudes of the actors and other parties associated with it; and post-conflict social, economic and institutional capacities will affect planning for DDR, and have an impact on the strategic orientation of UN support; \n National capacities for DDR: The extent of pre-existing national and institutional capacities in the conflict-affected country to plan and implement DDR will considerably affect the nature of UN support and, consequently, planning requirements. Planning for DDR in contexts with weak or non-existent national institutions will differ greatly from planning DDR in contexts with stable and effective national institutions; \n The role of the UN: How the role of the UN is defined in general terms, and for DDR specifically, will depend on the extent of responsibility and direct involvement assumed by national actors, and the UN\u2019s own capacity to complement and support these efforts. This role definition will directly influence the scope and nature of the UN\u2019s engagement in DDR, and hence requirements for planning; \n Interaction with other international and regional actors: The presence and need to collaborate with international or regional actors (e.g., the European Union, NATO, the African Union, the Economic Community of West African States) with a current or potential role in the management of the conflict will affect the general planning process.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -41718,14 +41718,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Planning for DDR in contexts with weak or non-existent national institutions will differ greatly from planning DDR in contexts with stable and effective national institutions; \\n The role of the UN: How the role of the UN is defined in general terms, and for DDR specifically, will depend on the extent of responsibility and direct involvement assumed by national actors, and the UN\u2019s own capacity to complement and support these efforts.", + "Sentence": "Planning for DDR in contexts with weak or non-existent national institutions will differ greatly from planning DDR in contexts with stable and effective national institutions; \n The role of the UN: How the role of the UN is defined in general terms, and for DDR specifically, will depend on the extent of responsibility and direct involvement assumed by national actors, and the UN\u2019s own capacity to complement and support these efforts.", "newParagraph": "planning process requirement given module intended serve general guide number factor affect various planning process including n pace duration peace process drawnout peace process give un international community generally time consult plan develop pro gramme later implementation sudanese peace process good example n contextual local reality dynamic consequence conflict attitude actor party associated postconflict social economic institutional capacity affect planning ddr impact strategic orientation un support n national capacity ddr extent preexisting national institutional capacity conflictaffected country plan implement ddr considerably affect nature un support consequently planning requirement planning ddr context weak nonexistent national institution differ greatly planning ddr context stable effective national institution n role un role un defined general term ddr specifically depend extent responsibility direct involvement assumed national actor un capacity complement support effort role definition directly influence scope nature un engagement ddr hence requirement planning n interaction international regional actor presence need collaborate international regional actor eg european union nato african union economic community west african state current potential role management conflict affect general planning process", "ProcessedSent": "planning ddr context weak nonexistent national institution differ greatly planning ddr context stable effective national institution n role un role un defined general term ddr specifically depend extent responsibility direct involvement assumed national actor un capacity complement support effort", "SentID": 2317 }, { "ParagraphID": 742, - "Paragraph": "The planning process and requirements given in this module are intended to serve as a general guide. A number of factors will affect the various planning processes, including: \\n The pace and duration of a peace process: A drawn-out peace process gives the UN, and the international community generally, more time to consult, plan and develop pro- grammes for later implementation (the Sudanese peace process is a good example); \\n Contextual and local realities: The dynamics and consequences of conflict; the attitudes of the actors and other parties associated with it; and post-conflict social, economic and institutional capacities will affect planning for DDR, and have an impact on the strategic orientation of UN support; \\n National capacities for DDR: The extent of pre-existing national and institutional capacities in the conflict-affected country to plan and implement DDR will considerably affect the nature of UN support and, consequently, planning requirements. Planning for DDR in contexts with weak or non-existent national institutions will differ greatly from planning DDR in contexts with stable and effective national institutions; \\n The role of the UN: How the role of the UN is defined in general terms, and for DDR specifically, will depend on the extent of responsibility and direct involvement assumed by national actors, and the UN\u2019s own capacity to complement and support these efforts. This role definition will directly influence the scope and nature of the UN\u2019s engagement in DDR, and hence requirements for planning; \\n Interaction with other international and regional actors: The presence and need to collaborate with international or regional actors (e.g., the European Union, NATO, the African Union, the Economic Community of West African States) with a current or potential role in the management of the conflict will affect the general planning process.", + "Paragraph": "The planning process and requirements given in this module are intended to serve as a general guide. A number of factors will affect the various planning processes, including: \n The pace and duration of a peace process: A drawn-out peace process gives the UN, and the international community generally, more time to consult, plan and develop pro- grammes for later implementation (the Sudanese peace process is a good example); \n Contextual and local realities: The dynamics and consequences of conflict; the attitudes of the actors and other parties associated with it; and post-conflict social, economic and institutional capacities will affect planning for DDR, and have an impact on the strategic orientation of UN support; \n National capacities for DDR: The extent of pre-existing national and institutional capacities in the conflict-affected country to plan and implement DDR will considerably affect the nature of UN support and, consequently, planning requirements. Planning for DDR in contexts with weak or non-existent national institutions will differ greatly from planning DDR in contexts with stable and effective national institutions; \n The role of the UN: How the role of the UN is defined in general terms, and for DDR specifically, will depend on the extent of responsibility and direct involvement assumed by national actors, and the UN\u2019s own capacity to complement and support these efforts. This role definition will directly influence the scope and nature of the UN\u2019s engagement in DDR, and hence requirements for planning; \n Interaction with other international and regional actors: The presence and need to collaborate with international or regional actors (e.g., the European Union, NATO, the African Union, the Economic Community of West African States) with a current or potential role in the management of the conflict will affect the general planning process.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -41736,14 +41736,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This role definition will directly influence the scope and nature of the UN\u2019s engagement in DDR, and hence requirements for planning; \\n Interaction with other international and regional actors: The presence and need to collaborate with international or regional actors (e.g., the European Union, NATO, the African Union, the Economic Community of West African States) with a current or potential role in the management of the conflict will affect the general planning process.", + "Sentence": "This role definition will directly influence the scope and nature of the UN\u2019s engagement in DDR, and hence requirements for planning; \n Interaction with other international and regional actors: The presence and need to collaborate with international or regional actors (e.g., the European Union, NATO, the African Union, the Economic Community of West African States) with a current or potential role in the management of the conflict will affect the general planning process.", "newParagraph": "planning process requirement given module intended serve general guide number factor affect various planning process including n pace duration peace process drawnout peace process give un international community generally time consult plan develop pro gramme later implementation sudanese peace process good example n contextual local reality dynamic consequence conflict attitude actor party associated postconflict social economic institutional capacity affect planning ddr impact strategic orientation un support n national capacity ddr extent preexisting national institutional capacity conflictaffected country plan implement ddr considerably affect nature un support consequently planning requirement planning ddr context weak nonexistent national institution differ greatly planning ddr context stable effective national institution n role un role un defined general term ddr specifically depend extent responsibility direct involvement assumed national actor un capacity complement support effort role definition directly influence scope nature un engagement ddr hence requirement planning n interaction international regional actor presence need collaborate international regional actor eg european union nato african union economic community west african state current potential role management conflict affect general planning process", "ProcessedSent": "role definition directly influence scope nature un engagement ddr hence requirement planning n interaction international regional actor presence need collaborate international regional actor eg european union nato african union economic community west african state current potential role management conflict affect general planning process", "SentID": 2318 }, { "ParagraphID": 743, - "Paragraph": "In addition, this module provides guidance on: \\n adapting the DDR planning process to the broader framework of mission and UN country team planning in post-conflict contexts; \\n linking the UN planning process to national DDR planning processes; \\n the chronological stages and sequencing (i.e., the ordering of activities over time) of DDR planning activities; \\n the different aspects and products of the planning process, including its political (peace process and Security Council mandate), programmatic\/operational and organizational\/ institutional dimensions; \\n the institutional capacities required at both Headquarters and country levels to ensure an efficient and integrated UN planning process.", + "Paragraph": "In addition, this module provides guidance on: \n adapting the DDR planning process to the broader framework of mission and UN country team planning in post-conflict contexts; \n linking the UN planning process to national DDR planning processes; \n the chronological stages and sequencing (i.e., the ordering of activities over time) of DDR planning activities; \n the different aspects and products of the planning process, including its political (peace process and Security Council mandate), programmatic\/operational and organizational\/ institutional dimensions; \n the institutional capacities required at both Headquarters and country levels to ensure an efficient and integrated UN planning process.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -41754,7 +41754,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "In addition, this module provides guidance on: \\n adapting the DDR planning process to the broader framework of mission and UN country team planning in post-conflict contexts; \\n linking the UN planning process to national DDR planning processes; \\n the chronological stages and sequencing (i.e., the ordering of activities over time) of DDR planning activities; \\n the different aspects and products of the planning process, including its political (peace process and Security Council mandate), programmatic\/operational and organizational\/ institutional dimensions; \\n the institutional capacities required at both Headquarters and country levels to ensure an efficient and integrated UN planning process.", + "Sentence": "In addition, this module provides guidance on: \n adapting the DDR planning process to the broader framework of mission and UN country team planning in post-conflict contexts; \n linking the UN planning process to national DDR planning processes; \n the chronological stages and sequencing (i.e., the ordering of activities over time) of DDR planning activities; \n the different aspects and products of the planning process, including its political (peace process and Security Council mandate), programmatic\/operational and organizational\/ institutional dimensions; \n the institutional capacities required at both Headquarters and country levels to ensure an efficient and integrated UN planning process.", "newParagraph": "addition module provides guidance n adapting ddr planning process broader framework mission un country team planning postconflict context n linking un planning process national ddr planning process n chronological stage sequencing ie ordering activity time ddr planning activity n different aspect product planning process including political peace process security council mandate programmaticoperational organizational institutional dimension n institutional capacity required headquarters country level ensure efficient integrated un planning process", "ProcessedSent": "addition module provides guidance n adapting ddr planning process broader framework mission un country team planning postconflict context n linking un planning process national ddr planning process n chronological stage sequencing ie ordering activity time ddr planning activity n different aspect product planning process including political peace process security council mandate programmaticoperational organizational institutional dimension n institutional capacity required headquarters country level ensure efficient integrated un planning process", "SentID": 2319 @@ -41797,7 +41797,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 745, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca)\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \\n b)\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \\n c)\u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca)\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \n b)\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \n c)\u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -41815,7 +41815,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 745, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca)\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \\n b)\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \\n c)\u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca)\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \n b)\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \n c)\u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -41826,14 +41826,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca)\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard.", + "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca)\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard.", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "ProcessedSent": "use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard", "SentID": 2323 }, { "ParagraphID": 745, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca)\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \\n b)\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \\n c)\u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca)\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \n b)\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \n c)\u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -41844,14 +41844,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n b)\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications.", + "Sentence": "\n b)\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications.", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "ProcessedSent": "n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification", "SentID": 2324 }, { "ParagraphID": 745, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca)\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \\n b)\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \\n c)\u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca)\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \n b)\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \n c)\u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -41862,7 +41862,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n c)\u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Sentence": "\n c)\u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "ProcessedSent": "n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "SentID": 2325 @@ -41995,7 +41995,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 749, - "Paragraph": "The planning process for the DDR programmes is guided by the principles, key considerations and approaches defined in IDDRS 2.10 on the UN Approach to DDR. Of particular importance are: \\n Unity of effort: The achievement of unity of effort and integration is only possible with an inclusive and sound mission planning process involving all relevant UN agencies, departments, funds and programmes at both the Headquarters and field levels. DDR planning takes place within this broader integrated mission planning process; \\n Integration: The integrated approach to planning tries to develop, to the extent possible: \\n\\n a common framework (i.e., one that everyone involved uses) for developing, man- aging, funding and implementing a UN DDR strategy within the context of a peace mission; \\n\\n an integrated DDR management structure (unit or section), with the participation of staff from participating UN agencies and primary reporting lines to the Deputy Special Representative of the Secretary-General (DSRSG) for humanitarian and development affairs. Such an approach should include the co-location of staff, infrastructure and resources, as this allows for increased efficiency and reduced overhead costs, and brings about more responsive planning, implementation and coordination; \\n\\n joint programmes that harness UN country team and mission resources into a single process and results-based approach to putting the DDR strategy into operation and achieving shared objectives; \\n\\n a single framework for managing multiple sources of funding, as well as for co- ordinating funding mechanisms, thus ensuring that resources are used to deal with common priorities and needs; Efficient and effective planning: At the planning stage, a common DDR strategy and work plan should be developed on the basis of joint assessments and evaluation. This should establish a set of operational objectives, activities and expected results that all UN entities involved in DDR will use as the basis for their programming and implemen- tation activities. A common resource mobilization strategy involving all participating UN entities should be established within the integrated DDR framework in order to prevent duplication, and ensure coordination with donors and national authorities, and coherent and efficient planning.", + "Paragraph": "The planning process for the DDR programmes is guided by the principles, key considerations and approaches defined in IDDRS 2.10 on the UN Approach to DDR. Of particular importance are: \n Unity of effort: The achievement of unity of effort and integration is only possible with an inclusive and sound mission planning process involving all relevant UN agencies, departments, funds and programmes at both the Headquarters and field levels. DDR planning takes place within this broader integrated mission planning process; \n Integration: The integrated approach to planning tries to develop, to the extent possible: \n\n a common framework (i.e., one that everyone involved uses) for developing, man- aging, funding and implementing a UN DDR strategy within the context of a peace mission; \n\n an integrated DDR management structure (unit or section), with the participation of staff from participating UN agencies and primary reporting lines to the Deputy Special Representative of the Secretary-General (DSRSG) for humanitarian and development affairs. Such an approach should include the co-location of staff, infrastructure and resources, as this allows for increased efficiency and reduced overhead costs, and brings about more responsive planning, implementation and coordination; \n\n joint programmes that harness UN country team and mission resources into a single process and results-based approach to putting the DDR strategy into operation and achieving shared objectives; \n\n a single framework for managing multiple sources of funding, as well as for co- ordinating funding mechanisms, thus ensuring that resources are used to deal with common priorities and needs; Efficient and effective planning: At the planning stage, a common DDR strategy and work plan should be developed on the basis of joint assessments and evaluation. This should establish a set of operational objectives, activities and expected results that all UN entities involved in DDR will use as the basis for their programming and implemen- tation activities. A common resource mobilization strategy involving all participating UN entities should be established within the integrated DDR framework in order to prevent duplication, and ensure coordination with donors and national authorities, and coherent and efficient planning.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -42013,7 +42013,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 749, - "Paragraph": "The planning process for the DDR programmes is guided by the principles, key considerations and approaches defined in IDDRS 2.10 on the UN Approach to DDR. Of particular importance are: \\n Unity of effort: The achievement of unity of effort and integration is only possible with an inclusive and sound mission planning process involving all relevant UN agencies, departments, funds and programmes at both the Headquarters and field levels. DDR planning takes place within this broader integrated mission planning process; \\n Integration: The integrated approach to planning tries to develop, to the extent possible: \\n\\n a common framework (i.e., one that everyone involved uses) for developing, man- aging, funding and implementing a UN DDR strategy within the context of a peace mission; \\n\\n an integrated DDR management structure (unit or section), with the participation of staff from participating UN agencies and primary reporting lines to the Deputy Special Representative of the Secretary-General (DSRSG) for humanitarian and development affairs. Such an approach should include the co-location of staff, infrastructure and resources, as this allows for increased efficiency and reduced overhead costs, and brings about more responsive planning, implementation and coordination; \\n\\n joint programmes that harness UN country team and mission resources into a single process and results-based approach to putting the DDR strategy into operation and achieving shared objectives; \\n\\n a single framework for managing multiple sources of funding, as well as for co- ordinating funding mechanisms, thus ensuring that resources are used to deal with common priorities and needs; Efficient and effective planning: At the planning stage, a common DDR strategy and work plan should be developed on the basis of joint assessments and evaluation. This should establish a set of operational objectives, activities and expected results that all UN entities involved in DDR will use as the basis for their programming and implemen- tation activities. A common resource mobilization strategy involving all participating UN entities should be established within the integrated DDR framework in order to prevent duplication, and ensure coordination with donors and national authorities, and coherent and efficient planning.", + "Paragraph": "The planning process for the DDR programmes is guided by the principles, key considerations and approaches defined in IDDRS 2.10 on the UN Approach to DDR. Of particular importance are: \n Unity of effort: The achievement of unity of effort and integration is only possible with an inclusive and sound mission planning process involving all relevant UN agencies, departments, funds and programmes at both the Headquarters and field levels. DDR planning takes place within this broader integrated mission planning process; \n Integration: The integrated approach to planning tries to develop, to the extent possible: \n\n a common framework (i.e., one that everyone involved uses) for developing, man- aging, funding and implementing a UN DDR strategy within the context of a peace mission; \n\n an integrated DDR management structure (unit or section), with the participation of staff from participating UN agencies and primary reporting lines to the Deputy Special Representative of the Secretary-General (DSRSG) for humanitarian and development affairs. Such an approach should include the co-location of staff, infrastructure and resources, as this allows for increased efficiency and reduced overhead costs, and brings about more responsive planning, implementation and coordination; \n\n joint programmes that harness UN country team and mission resources into a single process and results-based approach to putting the DDR strategy into operation and achieving shared objectives; \n\n a single framework for managing multiple sources of funding, as well as for co- ordinating funding mechanisms, thus ensuring that resources are used to deal with common priorities and needs; Efficient and effective planning: At the planning stage, a common DDR strategy and work plan should be developed on the basis of joint assessments and evaluation. This should establish a set of operational objectives, activities and expected results that all UN entities involved in DDR will use as the basis for their programming and implemen- tation activities. A common resource mobilization strategy involving all participating UN entities should be established within the integrated DDR framework in order to prevent duplication, and ensure coordination with donors and national authorities, and coherent and efficient planning.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -42024,14 +42024,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Of particular importance are: \\n Unity of effort: The achievement of unity of effort and integration is only possible with an inclusive and sound mission planning process involving all relevant UN agencies, departments, funds and programmes at both the Headquarters and field levels.", + "Sentence": "Of particular importance are: \n Unity of effort: The achievement of unity of effort and integration is only possible with an inclusive and sound mission planning process involving all relevant UN agencies, departments, funds and programmes at both the Headquarters and field levels.", "newParagraph": "planning process ddr programme guided principle key consideration approach defined iddrs 210 un approach ddr particular importance n unity effort achievement unity effort integration possible inclusive sound mission planning process involving relevant un agency department fund programme headquarters field level ddr planning take place within broader integrated mission planning process n integration integrated approach planning try develop extent possible nn common framework ie one everyone involved us developing man aging funding implementing un ddr strategy within context peace mission nn integrated ddr management structure unit section participation staff participating un agency primary reporting line deputy special representative secretarygeneral dsrsg humanitarian development affair approach include colocation staff infrastructure resource allows increased efficiency reduced overhead cost brings responsive planning implementation coordination nn joint programme harness un country team mission resource single process resultsbased approach putting ddr strategy operation achieving shared objective nn single framework managing multiple source funding well co ordinating funding mechanism thus ensuring resource used deal common priority need efficient effective planning planning stage common ddr strategy work plan developed basis joint assessment evaluation establish set operational objective activity expected result un entity involved ddr use basis programming implemen tation activity common resource mobilization strategy involving participating un entity established within integrated ddr framework order prevent duplication ensure coordination donor national authority coherent efficient planning", "ProcessedSent": "particular importance n unity effort achievement unity effort integration possible inclusive sound mission planning process involving relevant un agency department fund programme headquarters field level", "SentID": 2334 }, { "ParagraphID": 749, - "Paragraph": "The planning process for the DDR programmes is guided by the principles, key considerations and approaches defined in IDDRS 2.10 on the UN Approach to DDR. Of particular importance are: \\n Unity of effort: The achievement of unity of effort and integration is only possible with an inclusive and sound mission planning process involving all relevant UN agencies, departments, funds and programmes at both the Headquarters and field levels. DDR planning takes place within this broader integrated mission planning process; \\n Integration: The integrated approach to planning tries to develop, to the extent possible: \\n\\n a common framework (i.e., one that everyone involved uses) for developing, man- aging, funding and implementing a UN DDR strategy within the context of a peace mission; \\n\\n an integrated DDR management structure (unit or section), with the participation of staff from participating UN agencies and primary reporting lines to the Deputy Special Representative of the Secretary-General (DSRSG) for humanitarian and development affairs. Such an approach should include the co-location of staff, infrastructure and resources, as this allows for increased efficiency and reduced overhead costs, and brings about more responsive planning, implementation and coordination; \\n\\n joint programmes that harness UN country team and mission resources into a single process and results-based approach to putting the DDR strategy into operation and achieving shared objectives; \\n\\n a single framework for managing multiple sources of funding, as well as for co- ordinating funding mechanisms, thus ensuring that resources are used to deal with common priorities and needs; Efficient and effective planning: At the planning stage, a common DDR strategy and work plan should be developed on the basis of joint assessments and evaluation. This should establish a set of operational objectives, activities and expected results that all UN entities involved in DDR will use as the basis for their programming and implemen- tation activities. A common resource mobilization strategy involving all participating UN entities should be established within the integrated DDR framework in order to prevent duplication, and ensure coordination with donors and national authorities, and coherent and efficient planning.", + "Paragraph": "The planning process for the DDR programmes is guided by the principles, key considerations and approaches defined in IDDRS 2.10 on the UN Approach to DDR. Of particular importance are: \n Unity of effort: The achievement of unity of effort and integration is only possible with an inclusive and sound mission planning process involving all relevant UN agencies, departments, funds and programmes at both the Headquarters and field levels. DDR planning takes place within this broader integrated mission planning process; \n Integration: The integrated approach to planning tries to develop, to the extent possible: \n\n a common framework (i.e., one that everyone involved uses) for developing, man- aging, funding and implementing a UN DDR strategy within the context of a peace mission; \n\n an integrated DDR management structure (unit or section), with the participation of staff from participating UN agencies and primary reporting lines to the Deputy Special Representative of the Secretary-General (DSRSG) for humanitarian and development affairs. Such an approach should include the co-location of staff, infrastructure and resources, as this allows for increased efficiency and reduced overhead costs, and brings about more responsive planning, implementation and coordination; \n\n joint programmes that harness UN country team and mission resources into a single process and results-based approach to putting the DDR strategy into operation and achieving shared objectives; \n\n a single framework for managing multiple sources of funding, as well as for co- ordinating funding mechanisms, thus ensuring that resources are used to deal with common priorities and needs; Efficient and effective planning: At the planning stage, a common DDR strategy and work plan should be developed on the basis of joint assessments and evaluation. This should establish a set of operational objectives, activities and expected results that all UN entities involved in DDR will use as the basis for their programming and implemen- tation activities. A common resource mobilization strategy involving all participating UN entities should be established within the integrated DDR framework in order to prevent duplication, and ensure coordination with donors and national authorities, and coherent and efficient planning.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -42042,14 +42042,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "DDR planning takes place within this broader integrated mission planning process; \\n Integration: The integrated approach to planning tries to develop, to the extent possible: \\n\\n a common framework (i.e., one that everyone involved uses) for developing, man- aging, funding and implementing a UN DDR strategy within the context of a peace mission; \\n\\n an integrated DDR management structure (unit or section), with the participation of staff from participating UN agencies and primary reporting lines to the Deputy Special Representative of the Secretary-General (DSRSG) for humanitarian and development affairs.", + "Sentence": "DDR planning takes place within this broader integrated mission planning process; \n Integration: The integrated approach to planning tries to develop, to the extent possible: \n\n a common framework (i.e., one that everyone involved uses) for developing, man- aging, funding and implementing a UN DDR strategy within the context of a peace mission; \n\n an integrated DDR management structure (unit or section), with the participation of staff from participating UN agencies and primary reporting lines to the Deputy Special Representative of the Secretary-General (DSRSG) for humanitarian and development affairs.", "newParagraph": "planning process ddr programme guided principle key consideration approach defined iddrs 210 un approach ddr particular importance n unity effort achievement unity effort integration possible inclusive sound mission planning process involving relevant un agency department fund programme headquarters field level ddr planning take place within broader integrated mission planning process n integration integrated approach planning try develop extent possible nn common framework ie one everyone involved us developing man aging funding implementing un ddr strategy within context peace mission nn integrated ddr management structure unit section participation staff participating un agency primary reporting line deputy special representative secretarygeneral dsrsg humanitarian development affair approach include colocation staff infrastructure resource allows increased efficiency reduced overhead cost brings responsive planning implementation coordination nn joint programme harness un country team mission resource single process resultsbased approach putting ddr strategy operation achieving shared objective nn single framework managing multiple source funding well co ordinating funding mechanism thus ensuring resource used deal common priority need efficient effective planning planning stage common ddr strategy work plan developed basis joint assessment evaluation establish set operational objective activity expected result un entity involved ddr use basis programming implemen tation activity common resource mobilization strategy involving participating un entity established within integrated ddr framework order prevent duplication ensure coordination donor national authority coherent efficient planning", "ProcessedSent": "ddr planning take place within broader integrated mission planning process n integration integrated approach planning try develop extent possible nn common framework ie one everyone involved us developing man aging funding implementing un ddr strategy within context peace mission nn integrated ddr management structure unit section participation staff participating un agency primary reporting line deputy special representative secretarygeneral dsrsg humanitarian development affair", "SentID": 2335 }, { "ParagraphID": 749, - "Paragraph": "The planning process for the DDR programmes is guided by the principles, key considerations and approaches defined in IDDRS 2.10 on the UN Approach to DDR. Of particular importance are: \\n Unity of effort: The achievement of unity of effort and integration is only possible with an inclusive and sound mission planning process involving all relevant UN agencies, departments, funds and programmes at both the Headquarters and field levels. DDR planning takes place within this broader integrated mission planning process; \\n Integration: The integrated approach to planning tries to develop, to the extent possible: \\n\\n a common framework (i.e., one that everyone involved uses) for developing, man- aging, funding and implementing a UN DDR strategy within the context of a peace mission; \\n\\n an integrated DDR management structure (unit or section), with the participation of staff from participating UN agencies and primary reporting lines to the Deputy Special Representative of the Secretary-General (DSRSG) for humanitarian and development affairs. Such an approach should include the co-location of staff, infrastructure and resources, as this allows for increased efficiency and reduced overhead costs, and brings about more responsive planning, implementation and coordination; \\n\\n joint programmes that harness UN country team and mission resources into a single process and results-based approach to putting the DDR strategy into operation and achieving shared objectives; \\n\\n a single framework for managing multiple sources of funding, as well as for co- ordinating funding mechanisms, thus ensuring that resources are used to deal with common priorities and needs; Efficient and effective planning: At the planning stage, a common DDR strategy and work plan should be developed on the basis of joint assessments and evaluation. This should establish a set of operational objectives, activities and expected results that all UN entities involved in DDR will use as the basis for their programming and implemen- tation activities. A common resource mobilization strategy involving all participating UN entities should be established within the integrated DDR framework in order to prevent duplication, and ensure coordination with donors and national authorities, and coherent and efficient planning.", + "Paragraph": "The planning process for the DDR programmes is guided by the principles, key considerations and approaches defined in IDDRS 2.10 on the UN Approach to DDR. Of particular importance are: \n Unity of effort: The achievement of unity of effort and integration is only possible with an inclusive and sound mission planning process involving all relevant UN agencies, departments, funds and programmes at both the Headquarters and field levels. DDR planning takes place within this broader integrated mission planning process; \n Integration: The integrated approach to planning tries to develop, to the extent possible: \n\n a common framework (i.e., one that everyone involved uses) for developing, man- aging, funding and implementing a UN DDR strategy within the context of a peace mission; \n\n an integrated DDR management structure (unit or section), with the participation of staff from participating UN agencies and primary reporting lines to the Deputy Special Representative of the Secretary-General (DSRSG) for humanitarian and development affairs. Such an approach should include the co-location of staff, infrastructure and resources, as this allows for increased efficiency and reduced overhead costs, and brings about more responsive planning, implementation and coordination; \n\n joint programmes that harness UN country team and mission resources into a single process and results-based approach to putting the DDR strategy into operation and achieving shared objectives; \n\n a single framework for managing multiple sources of funding, as well as for co- ordinating funding mechanisms, thus ensuring that resources are used to deal with common priorities and needs; Efficient and effective planning: At the planning stage, a common DDR strategy and work plan should be developed on the basis of joint assessments and evaluation. This should establish a set of operational objectives, activities and expected results that all UN entities involved in DDR will use as the basis for their programming and implemen- tation activities. A common resource mobilization strategy involving all participating UN entities should be established within the integrated DDR framework in order to prevent duplication, and ensure coordination with donors and national authorities, and coherent and efficient planning.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -42060,14 +42060,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Such an approach should include the co-location of staff, infrastructure and resources, as this allows for increased efficiency and reduced overhead costs, and brings about more responsive planning, implementation and coordination; \\n\\n joint programmes that harness UN country team and mission resources into a single process and results-based approach to putting the DDR strategy into operation and achieving shared objectives; \\n\\n a single framework for managing multiple sources of funding, as well as for co- ordinating funding mechanisms, thus ensuring that resources are used to deal with common priorities and needs; Efficient and effective planning: At the planning stage, a common DDR strategy and work plan should be developed on the basis of joint assessments and evaluation.", + "Sentence": "Such an approach should include the co-location of staff, infrastructure and resources, as this allows for increased efficiency and reduced overhead costs, and brings about more responsive planning, implementation and coordination; \n\n joint programmes that harness UN country team and mission resources into a single process and results-based approach to putting the DDR strategy into operation and achieving shared objectives; \n\n a single framework for managing multiple sources of funding, as well as for co- ordinating funding mechanisms, thus ensuring that resources are used to deal with common priorities and needs; Efficient and effective planning: At the planning stage, a common DDR strategy and work plan should be developed on the basis of joint assessments and evaluation.", "newParagraph": "planning process ddr programme guided principle key consideration approach defined iddrs 210 un approach ddr particular importance n unity effort achievement unity effort integration possible inclusive sound mission planning process involving relevant un agency department fund programme headquarters field level ddr planning take place within broader integrated mission planning process n integration integrated approach planning try develop extent possible nn common framework ie one everyone involved us developing man aging funding implementing un ddr strategy within context peace mission nn integrated ddr management structure unit section participation staff participating un agency primary reporting line deputy special representative secretarygeneral dsrsg humanitarian development affair approach include colocation staff infrastructure resource allows increased efficiency reduced overhead cost brings responsive planning implementation coordination nn joint programme harness un country team mission resource single process resultsbased approach putting ddr strategy operation achieving shared objective nn single framework managing multiple source funding well co ordinating funding mechanism thus ensuring resource used deal common priority need efficient effective planning planning stage common ddr strategy work plan developed basis joint assessment evaluation establish set operational objective activity expected result un entity involved ddr use basis programming implemen tation activity common resource mobilization strategy involving participating un entity established within integrated ddr framework order prevent duplication ensure coordination donor national authority coherent efficient planning", "ProcessedSent": "approach include colocation staff infrastructure resource allows increased efficiency reduced overhead cost brings responsive planning implementation coordination nn joint programme harness un country team mission resource single process resultsbased approach putting ddr strategy operation achieving shared objective nn single framework managing multiple source funding well co ordinating funding mechanism thus ensuring resource used deal common priority need efficient effective planning planning stage common ddr strategy work plan developed basis joint assessment evaluation", "SentID": 2336 }, { "ParagraphID": 749, - "Paragraph": "The planning process for the DDR programmes is guided by the principles, key considerations and approaches defined in IDDRS 2.10 on the UN Approach to DDR. Of particular importance are: \\n Unity of effort: The achievement of unity of effort and integration is only possible with an inclusive and sound mission planning process involving all relevant UN agencies, departments, funds and programmes at both the Headquarters and field levels. DDR planning takes place within this broader integrated mission planning process; \\n Integration: The integrated approach to planning tries to develop, to the extent possible: \\n\\n a common framework (i.e., one that everyone involved uses) for developing, man- aging, funding and implementing a UN DDR strategy within the context of a peace mission; \\n\\n an integrated DDR management structure (unit or section), with the participation of staff from participating UN agencies and primary reporting lines to the Deputy Special Representative of the Secretary-General (DSRSG) for humanitarian and development affairs. Such an approach should include the co-location of staff, infrastructure and resources, as this allows for increased efficiency and reduced overhead costs, and brings about more responsive planning, implementation and coordination; \\n\\n joint programmes that harness UN country team and mission resources into a single process and results-based approach to putting the DDR strategy into operation and achieving shared objectives; \\n\\n a single framework for managing multiple sources of funding, as well as for co- ordinating funding mechanisms, thus ensuring that resources are used to deal with common priorities and needs; Efficient and effective planning: At the planning stage, a common DDR strategy and work plan should be developed on the basis of joint assessments and evaluation. This should establish a set of operational objectives, activities and expected results that all UN entities involved in DDR will use as the basis for their programming and implemen- tation activities. A common resource mobilization strategy involving all participating UN entities should be established within the integrated DDR framework in order to prevent duplication, and ensure coordination with donors and national authorities, and coherent and efficient planning.", + "Paragraph": "The planning process for the DDR programmes is guided by the principles, key considerations and approaches defined in IDDRS 2.10 on the UN Approach to DDR. Of particular importance are: \n Unity of effort: The achievement of unity of effort and integration is only possible with an inclusive and sound mission planning process involving all relevant UN agencies, departments, funds and programmes at both the Headquarters and field levels. DDR planning takes place within this broader integrated mission planning process; \n Integration: The integrated approach to planning tries to develop, to the extent possible: \n\n a common framework (i.e., one that everyone involved uses) for developing, man- aging, funding and implementing a UN DDR strategy within the context of a peace mission; \n\n an integrated DDR management structure (unit or section), with the participation of staff from participating UN agencies and primary reporting lines to the Deputy Special Representative of the Secretary-General (DSRSG) for humanitarian and development affairs. Such an approach should include the co-location of staff, infrastructure and resources, as this allows for increased efficiency and reduced overhead costs, and brings about more responsive planning, implementation and coordination; \n\n joint programmes that harness UN country team and mission resources into a single process and results-based approach to putting the DDR strategy into operation and achieving shared objectives; \n\n a single framework for managing multiple sources of funding, as well as for co- ordinating funding mechanisms, thus ensuring that resources are used to deal with common priorities and needs; Efficient and effective planning: At the planning stage, a common DDR strategy and work plan should be developed on the basis of joint assessments and evaluation. This should establish a set of operational objectives, activities and expected results that all UN entities involved in DDR will use as the basis for their programming and implemen- tation activities. A common resource mobilization strategy involving all participating UN entities should be established within the integrated DDR framework in order to prevent duplication, and ensure coordination with donors and national authorities, and coherent and efficient planning.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -42085,7 +42085,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 749, - "Paragraph": "The planning process for the DDR programmes is guided by the principles, key considerations and approaches defined in IDDRS 2.10 on the UN Approach to DDR. Of particular importance are: \\n Unity of effort: The achievement of unity of effort and integration is only possible with an inclusive and sound mission planning process involving all relevant UN agencies, departments, funds and programmes at both the Headquarters and field levels. DDR planning takes place within this broader integrated mission planning process; \\n Integration: The integrated approach to planning tries to develop, to the extent possible: \\n\\n a common framework (i.e., one that everyone involved uses) for developing, man- aging, funding and implementing a UN DDR strategy within the context of a peace mission; \\n\\n an integrated DDR management structure (unit or section), with the participation of staff from participating UN agencies and primary reporting lines to the Deputy Special Representative of the Secretary-General (DSRSG) for humanitarian and development affairs. Such an approach should include the co-location of staff, infrastructure and resources, as this allows for increased efficiency and reduced overhead costs, and brings about more responsive planning, implementation and coordination; \\n\\n joint programmes that harness UN country team and mission resources into a single process and results-based approach to putting the DDR strategy into operation and achieving shared objectives; \\n\\n a single framework for managing multiple sources of funding, as well as for co- ordinating funding mechanisms, thus ensuring that resources are used to deal with common priorities and needs; Efficient and effective planning: At the planning stage, a common DDR strategy and work plan should be developed on the basis of joint assessments and evaluation. This should establish a set of operational objectives, activities and expected results that all UN entities involved in DDR will use as the basis for their programming and implemen- tation activities. A common resource mobilization strategy involving all participating UN entities should be established within the integrated DDR framework in order to prevent duplication, and ensure coordination with donors and national authorities, and coherent and efficient planning.", + "Paragraph": "The planning process for the DDR programmes is guided by the principles, key considerations and approaches defined in IDDRS 2.10 on the UN Approach to DDR. Of particular importance are: \n Unity of effort: The achievement of unity of effort and integration is only possible with an inclusive and sound mission planning process involving all relevant UN agencies, departments, funds and programmes at both the Headquarters and field levels. DDR planning takes place within this broader integrated mission planning process; \n Integration: The integrated approach to planning tries to develop, to the extent possible: \n\n a common framework (i.e., one that everyone involved uses) for developing, man- aging, funding and implementing a UN DDR strategy within the context of a peace mission; \n\n an integrated DDR management structure (unit or section), with the participation of staff from participating UN agencies and primary reporting lines to the Deputy Special Representative of the Secretary-General (DSRSG) for humanitarian and development affairs. Such an approach should include the co-location of staff, infrastructure and resources, as this allows for increased efficiency and reduced overhead costs, and brings about more responsive planning, implementation and coordination; \n\n joint programmes that harness UN country team and mission resources into a single process and results-based approach to putting the DDR strategy into operation and achieving shared objectives; \n\n a single framework for managing multiple sources of funding, as well as for co- ordinating funding mechanisms, thus ensuring that resources are used to deal with common priorities and needs; Efficient and effective planning: At the planning stage, a common DDR strategy and work plan should be developed on the basis of joint assessments and evaluation. This should establish a set of operational objectives, activities and expected results that all UN entities involved in DDR will use as the basis for their programming and implemen- tation activities. A common resource mobilization strategy involving all participating UN entities should be established within the integrated DDR framework in order to prevent duplication, and ensure coordination with donors and national authorities, and coherent and efficient planning.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -42373,7 +42373,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 754, - "Paragraph": "During the pre-planning phase of the UN\u2019s involvement in a post-conflict peacekeeping or peace-building context, the identification of an appropriate role for the UN in supporting DDR efforts should be based on timely assessments and analyses of the situation and its requirements. The early identification of potential entry points and strategic options for UN support is essential to ensuring the UN\u2019s capacity to respond efficiently and effectively. Integrated preparatory activities and pre-mission planning are vital to the delivery of that capacity. While there is no section\/unit at UN Headquarters with the specific role of coordinating integrated DDR planning at present, many of the following DDR pre-planning tasks can and should be coordinated by the lead planning department and key operational agencies of the UN country team. Activities that should be included in a preparatory assistance or pre- planning framework include: \\n the development of an initial set of strategic options for or assessments of DDR, and the potential role of the UN in supporting DDR; \\n the provision of DDR technical advice to special envoys, Special Representatives of the Secretary-General or country-level UN staff within the context of peace negotiations or UN mediation; \\n the secondment of DDR specialists or hiring of private DDR consultants (sometimes funded by interested Member States) to assist during the peace process and provide strategic and policy advice to the UN and relevant national parties at country level for planning purposes; \\n the assignment of a UN country team to carry out exploratory DDR assessments and surveys as early as possible. These surveys and assessments include: conflict assess- ment; combatant needs assessments; the identification of reintegration opportunities; and labour and goods markets assessments; \\n assessing the in-country DDR planning and delivery capacity to support any DDR programme that might be set up (both UN and national institutional capacities); \\n contacting key donors and other international stakeholders on DDR issues with the aim of defining priorities and methods for information sharing and collaboration; \\n the early identification of potential key DDR personnel for the integrated DDR unit.", + "Paragraph": "During the pre-planning phase of the UN\u2019s involvement in a post-conflict peacekeeping or peace-building context, the identification of an appropriate role for the UN in supporting DDR efforts should be based on timely assessments and analyses of the situation and its requirements. The early identification of potential entry points and strategic options for UN support is essential to ensuring the UN\u2019s capacity to respond efficiently and effectively. Integrated preparatory activities and pre-mission planning are vital to the delivery of that capacity. While there is no section\/unit at UN Headquarters with the specific role of coordinating integrated DDR planning at present, many of the following DDR pre-planning tasks can and should be coordinated by the lead planning department and key operational agencies of the UN country team. Activities that should be included in a preparatory assistance or pre- planning framework include: \n the development of an initial set of strategic options for or assessments of DDR, and the potential role of the UN in supporting DDR; \n the provision of DDR technical advice to special envoys, Special Representatives of the Secretary-General or country-level UN staff within the context of peace negotiations or UN mediation; \n the secondment of DDR specialists or hiring of private DDR consultants (sometimes funded by interested Member States) to assist during the peace process and provide strategic and policy advice to the UN and relevant national parties at country level for planning purposes; \n the assignment of a UN country team to carry out exploratory DDR assessments and surveys as early as possible. These surveys and assessments include: conflict assess- ment; combatant needs assessments; the identification of reintegration opportunities; and labour and goods markets assessments; \n assessing the in-country DDR planning and delivery capacity to support any DDR programme that might be set up (both UN and national institutional capacities); \n contacting key donors and other international stakeholders on DDR issues with the aim of defining priorities and methods for information sharing and collaboration; \n the early identification of potential key DDR personnel for the integrated DDR unit.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -42391,7 +42391,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 754, - "Paragraph": "During the pre-planning phase of the UN\u2019s involvement in a post-conflict peacekeeping or peace-building context, the identification of an appropriate role for the UN in supporting DDR efforts should be based on timely assessments and analyses of the situation and its requirements. The early identification of potential entry points and strategic options for UN support is essential to ensuring the UN\u2019s capacity to respond efficiently and effectively. Integrated preparatory activities and pre-mission planning are vital to the delivery of that capacity. While there is no section\/unit at UN Headquarters with the specific role of coordinating integrated DDR planning at present, many of the following DDR pre-planning tasks can and should be coordinated by the lead planning department and key operational agencies of the UN country team. Activities that should be included in a preparatory assistance or pre- planning framework include: \\n the development of an initial set of strategic options for or assessments of DDR, and the potential role of the UN in supporting DDR; \\n the provision of DDR technical advice to special envoys, Special Representatives of the Secretary-General or country-level UN staff within the context of peace negotiations or UN mediation; \\n the secondment of DDR specialists or hiring of private DDR consultants (sometimes funded by interested Member States) to assist during the peace process and provide strategic and policy advice to the UN and relevant national parties at country level for planning purposes; \\n the assignment of a UN country team to carry out exploratory DDR assessments and surveys as early as possible. These surveys and assessments include: conflict assess- ment; combatant needs assessments; the identification of reintegration opportunities; and labour and goods markets assessments; \\n assessing the in-country DDR planning and delivery capacity to support any DDR programme that might be set up (both UN and national institutional capacities); \\n contacting key donors and other international stakeholders on DDR issues with the aim of defining priorities and methods for information sharing and collaboration; \\n the early identification of potential key DDR personnel for the integrated DDR unit.", + "Paragraph": "During the pre-planning phase of the UN\u2019s involvement in a post-conflict peacekeeping or peace-building context, the identification of an appropriate role for the UN in supporting DDR efforts should be based on timely assessments and analyses of the situation and its requirements. The early identification of potential entry points and strategic options for UN support is essential to ensuring the UN\u2019s capacity to respond efficiently and effectively. Integrated preparatory activities and pre-mission planning are vital to the delivery of that capacity. While there is no section\/unit at UN Headquarters with the specific role of coordinating integrated DDR planning at present, many of the following DDR pre-planning tasks can and should be coordinated by the lead planning department and key operational agencies of the UN country team. Activities that should be included in a preparatory assistance or pre- planning framework include: \n the development of an initial set of strategic options for or assessments of DDR, and the potential role of the UN in supporting DDR; \n the provision of DDR technical advice to special envoys, Special Representatives of the Secretary-General or country-level UN staff within the context of peace negotiations or UN mediation; \n the secondment of DDR specialists or hiring of private DDR consultants (sometimes funded by interested Member States) to assist during the peace process and provide strategic and policy advice to the UN and relevant national parties at country level for planning purposes; \n the assignment of a UN country team to carry out exploratory DDR assessments and surveys as early as possible. These surveys and assessments include: conflict assess- ment; combatant needs assessments; the identification of reintegration opportunities; and labour and goods markets assessments; \n assessing the in-country DDR planning and delivery capacity to support any DDR programme that might be set up (both UN and national institutional capacities); \n contacting key donors and other international stakeholders on DDR issues with the aim of defining priorities and methods for information sharing and collaboration; \n the early identification of potential key DDR personnel for the integrated DDR unit.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -42409,7 +42409,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 754, - "Paragraph": "During the pre-planning phase of the UN\u2019s involvement in a post-conflict peacekeeping or peace-building context, the identification of an appropriate role for the UN in supporting DDR efforts should be based on timely assessments and analyses of the situation and its requirements. The early identification of potential entry points and strategic options for UN support is essential to ensuring the UN\u2019s capacity to respond efficiently and effectively. Integrated preparatory activities and pre-mission planning are vital to the delivery of that capacity. While there is no section\/unit at UN Headquarters with the specific role of coordinating integrated DDR planning at present, many of the following DDR pre-planning tasks can and should be coordinated by the lead planning department and key operational agencies of the UN country team. Activities that should be included in a preparatory assistance or pre- planning framework include: \\n the development of an initial set of strategic options for or assessments of DDR, and the potential role of the UN in supporting DDR; \\n the provision of DDR technical advice to special envoys, Special Representatives of the Secretary-General or country-level UN staff within the context of peace negotiations or UN mediation; \\n the secondment of DDR specialists or hiring of private DDR consultants (sometimes funded by interested Member States) to assist during the peace process and provide strategic and policy advice to the UN and relevant national parties at country level for planning purposes; \\n the assignment of a UN country team to carry out exploratory DDR assessments and surveys as early as possible. These surveys and assessments include: conflict assess- ment; combatant needs assessments; the identification of reintegration opportunities; and labour and goods markets assessments; \\n assessing the in-country DDR planning and delivery capacity to support any DDR programme that might be set up (both UN and national institutional capacities); \\n contacting key donors and other international stakeholders on DDR issues with the aim of defining priorities and methods for information sharing and collaboration; \\n the early identification of potential key DDR personnel for the integrated DDR unit.", + "Paragraph": "During the pre-planning phase of the UN\u2019s involvement in a post-conflict peacekeeping or peace-building context, the identification of an appropriate role for the UN in supporting DDR efforts should be based on timely assessments and analyses of the situation and its requirements. The early identification of potential entry points and strategic options for UN support is essential to ensuring the UN\u2019s capacity to respond efficiently and effectively. Integrated preparatory activities and pre-mission planning are vital to the delivery of that capacity. While there is no section\/unit at UN Headquarters with the specific role of coordinating integrated DDR planning at present, many of the following DDR pre-planning tasks can and should be coordinated by the lead planning department and key operational agencies of the UN country team. Activities that should be included in a preparatory assistance or pre- planning framework include: \n the development of an initial set of strategic options for or assessments of DDR, and the potential role of the UN in supporting DDR; \n the provision of DDR technical advice to special envoys, Special Representatives of the Secretary-General or country-level UN staff within the context of peace negotiations or UN mediation; \n the secondment of DDR specialists or hiring of private DDR consultants (sometimes funded by interested Member States) to assist during the peace process and provide strategic and policy advice to the UN and relevant national parties at country level for planning purposes; \n the assignment of a UN country team to carry out exploratory DDR assessments and surveys as early as possible. These surveys and assessments include: conflict assess- ment; combatant needs assessments; the identification of reintegration opportunities; and labour and goods markets assessments; \n assessing the in-country DDR planning and delivery capacity to support any DDR programme that might be set up (both UN and national institutional capacities); \n contacting key donors and other international stakeholders on DDR issues with the aim of defining priorities and methods for information sharing and collaboration; \n the early identification of potential key DDR personnel for the integrated DDR unit.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -42427,7 +42427,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 754, - "Paragraph": "During the pre-planning phase of the UN\u2019s involvement in a post-conflict peacekeeping or peace-building context, the identification of an appropriate role for the UN in supporting DDR efforts should be based on timely assessments and analyses of the situation and its requirements. The early identification of potential entry points and strategic options for UN support is essential to ensuring the UN\u2019s capacity to respond efficiently and effectively. Integrated preparatory activities and pre-mission planning are vital to the delivery of that capacity. While there is no section\/unit at UN Headquarters with the specific role of coordinating integrated DDR planning at present, many of the following DDR pre-planning tasks can and should be coordinated by the lead planning department and key operational agencies of the UN country team. Activities that should be included in a preparatory assistance or pre- planning framework include: \\n the development of an initial set of strategic options for or assessments of DDR, and the potential role of the UN in supporting DDR; \\n the provision of DDR technical advice to special envoys, Special Representatives of the Secretary-General or country-level UN staff within the context of peace negotiations or UN mediation; \\n the secondment of DDR specialists or hiring of private DDR consultants (sometimes funded by interested Member States) to assist during the peace process and provide strategic and policy advice to the UN and relevant national parties at country level for planning purposes; \\n the assignment of a UN country team to carry out exploratory DDR assessments and surveys as early as possible. These surveys and assessments include: conflict assess- ment; combatant needs assessments; the identification of reintegration opportunities; and labour and goods markets assessments; \\n assessing the in-country DDR planning and delivery capacity to support any DDR programme that might be set up (both UN and national institutional capacities); \\n contacting key donors and other international stakeholders on DDR issues with the aim of defining priorities and methods for information sharing and collaboration; \\n the early identification of potential key DDR personnel for the integrated DDR unit.", + "Paragraph": "During the pre-planning phase of the UN\u2019s involvement in a post-conflict peacekeeping or peace-building context, the identification of an appropriate role for the UN in supporting DDR efforts should be based on timely assessments and analyses of the situation and its requirements. The early identification of potential entry points and strategic options for UN support is essential to ensuring the UN\u2019s capacity to respond efficiently and effectively. Integrated preparatory activities and pre-mission planning are vital to the delivery of that capacity. While there is no section\/unit at UN Headquarters with the specific role of coordinating integrated DDR planning at present, many of the following DDR pre-planning tasks can and should be coordinated by the lead planning department and key operational agencies of the UN country team. Activities that should be included in a preparatory assistance or pre- planning framework include: \n the development of an initial set of strategic options for or assessments of DDR, and the potential role of the UN in supporting DDR; \n the provision of DDR technical advice to special envoys, Special Representatives of the Secretary-General or country-level UN staff within the context of peace negotiations or UN mediation; \n the secondment of DDR specialists or hiring of private DDR consultants (sometimes funded by interested Member States) to assist during the peace process and provide strategic and policy advice to the UN and relevant national parties at country level for planning purposes; \n the assignment of a UN country team to carry out exploratory DDR assessments and surveys as early as possible. These surveys and assessments include: conflict assess- ment; combatant needs assessments; the identification of reintegration opportunities; and labour and goods markets assessments; \n assessing the in-country DDR planning and delivery capacity to support any DDR programme that might be set up (both UN and national institutional capacities); \n contacting key donors and other international stakeholders on DDR issues with the aim of defining priorities and methods for information sharing and collaboration; \n the early identification of potential key DDR personnel for the integrated DDR unit.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -42445,7 +42445,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 754, - "Paragraph": "During the pre-planning phase of the UN\u2019s involvement in a post-conflict peacekeeping or peace-building context, the identification of an appropriate role for the UN in supporting DDR efforts should be based on timely assessments and analyses of the situation and its requirements. The early identification of potential entry points and strategic options for UN support is essential to ensuring the UN\u2019s capacity to respond efficiently and effectively. Integrated preparatory activities and pre-mission planning are vital to the delivery of that capacity. While there is no section\/unit at UN Headquarters with the specific role of coordinating integrated DDR planning at present, many of the following DDR pre-planning tasks can and should be coordinated by the lead planning department and key operational agencies of the UN country team. Activities that should be included in a preparatory assistance or pre- planning framework include: \\n the development of an initial set of strategic options for or assessments of DDR, and the potential role of the UN in supporting DDR; \\n the provision of DDR technical advice to special envoys, Special Representatives of the Secretary-General or country-level UN staff within the context of peace negotiations or UN mediation; \\n the secondment of DDR specialists or hiring of private DDR consultants (sometimes funded by interested Member States) to assist during the peace process and provide strategic and policy advice to the UN and relevant national parties at country level for planning purposes; \\n the assignment of a UN country team to carry out exploratory DDR assessments and surveys as early as possible. These surveys and assessments include: conflict assess- ment; combatant needs assessments; the identification of reintegration opportunities; and labour and goods markets assessments; \\n assessing the in-country DDR planning and delivery capacity to support any DDR programme that might be set up (both UN and national institutional capacities); \\n contacting key donors and other international stakeholders on DDR issues with the aim of defining priorities and methods for information sharing and collaboration; \\n the early identification of potential key DDR personnel for the integrated DDR unit.", + "Paragraph": "During the pre-planning phase of the UN\u2019s involvement in a post-conflict peacekeeping or peace-building context, the identification of an appropriate role for the UN in supporting DDR efforts should be based on timely assessments and analyses of the situation and its requirements. The early identification of potential entry points and strategic options for UN support is essential to ensuring the UN\u2019s capacity to respond efficiently and effectively. Integrated preparatory activities and pre-mission planning are vital to the delivery of that capacity. While there is no section\/unit at UN Headquarters with the specific role of coordinating integrated DDR planning at present, many of the following DDR pre-planning tasks can and should be coordinated by the lead planning department and key operational agencies of the UN country team. Activities that should be included in a preparatory assistance or pre- planning framework include: \n the development of an initial set of strategic options for or assessments of DDR, and the potential role of the UN in supporting DDR; \n the provision of DDR technical advice to special envoys, Special Representatives of the Secretary-General or country-level UN staff within the context of peace negotiations or UN mediation; \n the secondment of DDR specialists or hiring of private DDR consultants (sometimes funded by interested Member States) to assist during the peace process and provide strategic and policy advice to the UN and relevant national parties at country level for planning purposes; \n the assignment of a UN country team to carry out exploratory DDR assessments and surveys as early as possible. These surveys and assessments include: conflict assess- ment; combatant needs assessments; the identification of reintegration opportunities; and labour and goods markets assessments; \n assessing the in-country DDR planning and delivery capacity to support any DDR programme that might be set up (both UN and national institutional capacities); \n contacting key donors and other international stakeholders on DDR issues with the aim of defining priorities and methods for information sharing and collaboration; \n the early identification of potential key DDR personnel for the integrated DDR unit.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -42456,14 +42456,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Phase II: Initial technical assessment and concept of operations", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Activities that should be included in a preparatory assistance or pre- planning framework include: \\n the development of an initial set of strategic options for or assessments of DDR, and the potential role of the UN in supporting DDR; \\n the provision of DDR technical advice to special envoys, Special Representatives of the Secretary-General or country-level UN staff within the context of peace negotiations or UN mediation; \\n the secondment of DDR specialists or hiring of private DDR consultants (sometimes funded by interested Member States) to assist during the peace process and provide strategic and policy advice to the UN and relevant national parties at country level for planning purposes; \\n the assignment of a UN country team to carry out exploratory DDR assessments and surveys as early as possible.", + "Sentence": "Activities that should be included in a preparatory assistance or pre- planning framework include: \n the development of an initial set of strategic options for or assessments of DDR, and the potential role of the UN in supporting DDR; \n the provision of DDR technical advice to special envoys, Special Representatives of the Secretary-General or country-level UN staff within the context of peace negotiations or UN mediation; \n the secondment of DDR specialists or hiring of private DDR consultants (sometimes funded by interested Member States) to assist during the peace process and provide strategic and policy advice to the UN and relevant national parties at country level for planning purposes; \n the assignment of a UN country team to carry out exploratory DDR assessments and surveys as early as possible.", "newParagraph": "preplanning phase un involvement postconflict peacekeeping peacebuilding context identification appropriate role un supporting ddr effort based timely assessment analysis situation requirement early identification potential entry point strategic option un support essential ensuring un capacity respond efficiently effectively integrated preparatory activity premission planning vital delivery capacity sectionunit un headquarters specific role coordinating integrated ddr planning present many following ddr preplanning task coordinated lead planning department key operational agency un country team activity included preparatory assistance pre planning framework include n development initial set strategic option assessment ddr potential role un supporting ddr n provision ddr technical advice special envoy special representative secretarygeneral countrylevel un staff within context peace negotiation un mediation n secondment ddr specialist hiring private ddr consultant sometimes funded interested member state assist peace process provide strategic policy advice un relevant national party country level planning purpose n assignment un country team carry exploratory ddr assessment survey early possible survey assessment include conflict ass ment combatant need assessment identification reintegration opportunity labour good market assessment n assessing incountry ddr planning delivery capacity support ddr programme might set un national institutional capacity n contacting key donor international stakeholder ddr issue aim defining priority method information sharing collaboration n early identification potential key ddr personnel integrated ddr unit", "ProcessedSent": "activity included preparatory assistance pre planning framework include n development initial set strategic option assessment ddr potential role un supporting ddr n provision ddr technical advice special envoy special representative secretarygeneral countrylevel un staff within context peace negotiation un mediation n secondment ddr specialist hiring private ddr consultant sometimes funded interested member state assist peace process provide strategic policy advice un relevant national party country level planning purpose n assignment un country team carry exploratory ddr assessment survey early possible", "SentID": 2358 }, { "ParagraphID": 754, - "Paragraph": "During the pre-planning phase of the UN\u2019s involvement in a post-conflict peacekeeping or peace-building context, the identification of an appropriate role for the UN in supporting DDR efforts should be based on timely assessments and analyses of the situation and its requirements. The early identification of potential entry points and strategic options for UN support is essential to ensuring the UN\u2019s capacity to respond efficiently and effectively. Integrated preparatory activities and pre-mission planning are vital to the delivery of that capacity. While there is no section\/unit at UN Headquarters with the specific role of coordinating integrated DDR planning at present, many of the following DDR pre-planning tasks can and should be coordinated by the lead planning department and key operational agencies of the UN country team. Activities that should be included in a preparatory assistance or pre- planning framework include: \\n the development of an initial set of strategic options for or assessments of DDR, and the potential role of the UN in supporting DDR; \\n the provision of DDR technical advice to special envoys, Special Representatives of the Secretary-General or country-level UN staff within the context of peace negotiations or UN mediation; \\n the secondment of DDR specialists or hiring of private DDR consultants (sometimes funded by interested Member States) to assist during the peace process and provide strategic and policy advice to the UN and relevant national parties at country level for planning purposes; \\n the assignment of a UN country team to carry out exploratory DDR assessments and surveys as early as possible. These surveys and assessments include: conflict assess- ment; combatant needs assessments; the identification of reintegration opportunities; and labour and goods markets assessments; \\n assessing the in-country DDR planning and delivery capacity to support any DDR programme that might be set up (both UN and national institutional capacities); \\n contacting key donors and other international stakeholders on DDR issues with the aim of defining priorities and methods for information sharing and collaboration; \\n the early identification of potential key DDR personnel for the integrated DDR unit.", + "Paragraph": "During the pre-planning phase of the UN\u2019s involvement in a post-conflict peacekeeping or peace-building context, the identification of an appropriate role for the UN in supporting DDR efforts should be based on timely assessments and analyses of the situation and its requirements. The early identification of potential entry points and strategic options for UN support is essential to ensuring the UN\u2019s capacity to respond efficiently and effectively. Integrated preparatory activities and pre-mission planning are vital to the delivery of that capacity. While there is no section\/unit at UN Headquarters with the specific role of coordinating integrated DDR planning at present, many of the following DDR pre-planning tasks can and should be coordinated by the lead planning department and key operational agencies of the UN country team. Activities that should be included in a preparatory assistance or pre- planning framework include: \n the development of an initial set of strategic options for or assessments of DDR, and the potential role of the UN in supporting DDR; \n the provision of DDR technical advice to special envoys, Special Representatives of the Secretary-General or country-level UN staff within the context of peace negotiations or UN mediation; \n the secondment of DDR specialists or hiring of private DDR consultants (sometimes funded by interested Member States) to assist during the peace process and provide strategic and policy advice to the UN and relevant national parties at country level for planning purposes; \n the assignment of a UN country team to carry out exploratory DDR assessments and surveys as early as possible. These surveys and assessments include: conflict assess- ment; combatant needs assessments; the identification of reintegration opportunities; and labour and goods markets assessments; \n assessing the in-country DDR planning and delivery capacity to support any DDR programme that might be set up (both UN and national institutional capacities); \n contacting key donors and other international stakeholders on DDR issues with the aim of defining priorities and methods for information sharing and collaboration; \n the early identification of potential key DDR personnel for the integrated DDR unit.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -42474,7 +42474,7 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Phase II: Initial technical assessment and concept of operations", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "These surveys and assessments include: conflict assess- ment; combatant needs assessments; the identification of reintegration opportunities; and labour and goods markets assessments; \\n assessing the in-country DDR planning and delivery capacity to support any DDR programme that might be set up (both UN and national institutional capacities); \\n contacting key donors and other international stakeholders on DDR issues with the aim of defining priorities and methods for information sharing and collaboration; \\n the early identification of potential key DDR personnel for the integrated DDR unit.", + "Sentence": "These surveys and assessments include: conflict assess- ment; combatant needs assessments; the identification of reintegration opportunities; and labour and goods markets assessments; \n assessing the in-country DDR planning and delivery capacity to support any DDR programme that might be set up (both UN and national institutional capacities); \n contacting key donors and other international stakeholders on DDR issues with the aim of defining priorities and methods for information sharing and collaboration; \n the early identification of potential key DDR personnel for the integrated DDR unit.", "newParagraph": "preplanning phase un involvement postconflict peacekeeping peacebuilding context identification appropriate role un supporting ddr effort based timely assessment analysis situation requirement early identification potential entry point strategic option un support essential ensuring un capacity respond efficiently effectively integrated preparatory activity premission planning vital delivery capacity sectionunit un headquarters specific role coordinating integrated ddr planning present many following ddr preplanning task coordinated lead planning department key operational agency un country team activity included preparatory assistance pre planning framework include n development initial set strategic option assessment ddr potential role un supporting ddr n provision ddr technical advice special envoy special representative secretarygeneral countrylevel un staff within context peace negotiation un mediation n secondment ddr specialist hiring private ddr consultant sometimes funded interested member state assist peace process provide strategic policy advice un relevant national party country level planning purpose n assignment un country team carry exploratory ddr assessment survey early possible survey assessment include conflict ass ment combatant need assessment identification reintegration opportunity labour good market assessment n assessing incountry ddr planning delivery capacity support ddr programme might set un national institutional capacity n contacting key donor international stakeholder ddr issue aim defining priority method information sharing collaboration n early identification potential key ddr personnel integrated ddr unit", "ProcessedSent": "survey assessment include conflict ass ment combatant need assessment identification reintegration opportunity labour good market assessment n assessing incountry ddr planning delivery capacity support ddr programme might set un national institutional capacity n contacting key donor international stakeholder ddr issue aim defining priority method information sharing collaboration n early identification potential key ddr personnel integrated ddr unit", "SentID": 2359 @@ -42571,7 +42571,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 758, - "Paragraph": "A well-prepared and well-conducted technical assessment should focus on: \\n the conditions and requirements for DDR; its relation to a peace agreement; \\n an assessment of national capacities; \\n the identification of options for UN support, including strategic objectives and the UN\u2019s operational role; \\n the role of DDR within the broader UN peace-building and mission strategy; \\n the role of UN support in relation to that of other national and international stakeholders.", + "Paragraph": "A well-prepared and well-conducted technical assessment should focus on: \n the conditions and requirements for DDR; its relation to a peace agreement; \n an assessment of national capacities; \n the identification of options for UN support, including strategic objectives and the UN\u2019s operational role; \n the role of DDR within the broader UN peace-building and mission strategy; \n the role of UN support in relation to that of other national and international stakeholders.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -42582,7 +42582,7 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Phase II: Initial technical assessment and concept of operations", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "A well-prepared and well-conducted technical assessment should focus on: \\n the conditions and requirements for DDR; its relation to a peace agreement; \\n an assessment of national capacities; \\n the identification of options for UN support, including strategic objectives and the UN\u2019s operational role; \\n the role of DDR within the broader UN peace-building and mission strategy; \\n the role of UN support in relation to that of other national and international stakeholders.", + "Sentence": "A well-prepared and well-conducted technical assessment should focus on: \n the conditions and requirements for DDR; its relation to a peace agreement; \n an assessment of national capacities; \n the identification of options for UN support, including strategic objectives and the UN\u2019s operational role; \n the role of DDR within the broader UN peace-building and mission strategy; \n the role of UN support in relation to that of other national and international stakeholders.", "newParagraph": "wellprepared wellconducted technical assessment focus n condition requirement ddr relation peace agreement n assessment national capacity n identification option un support including strategic objective un operational role n role ddr within broader un peacebuilding mission strategy n role un support relation national international stakeholder", "ProcessedSent": "wellprepared wellconducted technical assessment focus n condition requirement ddr relation peace agreement n assessment national capacity n identification option un support including strategic objective un operational role n role ddr within broader un peacebuilding mission strategy n role un support relation national international stakeholder", "SentID": 2365 @@ -42661,7 +42661,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 761, - "Paragraph": "The report of the Secretary-General to the Security Council sometimes contains proposals for the mandate for peace operation. The following points should be considered when pro- viding inputs to the DDR mandate: \\n It shall be consistent with the UN approach to DDR; \\n While it is important to stress the national aspect of the DDR programme, it is also necessary to recognize the immediate need to provide capacity-building support to increase or bring about national ownership, and to recognize the political difficulties that may complicate national ownership in a transitional situation.", + "Paragraph": "The report of the Secretary-General to the Security Council sometimes contains proposals for the mandate for peace operation. The following points should be considered when pro- viding inputs to the DDR mandate: \n It shall be consistent with the UN approach to DDR; \n While it is important to stress the national aspect of the DDR programme, it is also necessary to recognize the immediate need to provide capacity-building support to increase or bring about national ownership, and to recognize the political difficulties that may complicate national ownership in a transitional situation.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -42679,7 +42679,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 761, - "Paragraph": "The report of the Secretary-General to the Security Council sometimes contains proposals for the mandate for peace operation. The following points should be considered when pro- viding inputs to the DDR mandate: \\n It shall be consistent with the UN approach to DDR; \\n While it is important to stress the national aspect of the DDR programme, it is also necessary to recognize the immediate need to provide capacity-building support to increase or bring about national ownership, and to recognize the political difficulties that may complicate national ownership in a transitional situation.", + "Paragraph": "The report of the Secretary-General to the Security Council sometimes contains proposals for the mandate for peace operation. The following points should be considered when pro- viding inputs to the DDR mandate: \n It shall be consistent with the UN approach to DDR; \n While it is important to stress the national aspect of the DDR programme, it is also necessary to recognize the immediate need to provide capacity-building support to increase or bring about national ownership, and to recognize the political difficulties that may complicate national ownership in a transitional situation.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -42690,7 +42690,7 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Phase II: Initial technical assessment and concept of operations", "Heading3": "5.2.2. Mission mandate on DDR", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The following points should be considered when pro- viding inputs to the DDR mandate: \\n It shall be consistent with the UN approach to DDR; \\n While it is important to stress the national aspect of the DDR programme, it is also necessary to recognize the immediate need to provide capacity-building support to increase or bring about national ownership, and to recognize the political difficulties that may complicate national ownership in a transitional situation.", + "Sentence": "The following points should be considered when pro- viding inputs to the DDR mandate: \n It shall be consistent with the UN approach to DDR; \n While it is important to stress the national aspect of the DDR programme, it is also necessary to recognize the immediate need to provide capacity-building support to increase or bring about national ownership, and to recognize the political difficulties that may complicate national ownership in a transitional situation.", "newParagraph": "report secretarygeneral security council sometimes contains proposal mandate peace operation following point considered pro viding input ddr mandate n shall consistent un approach ddr n important stress national aspect ddr programme also necessary recognize immediate need provide capacitybuilding support increase bring national ownership recognize political difficulty may complicate national ownership transitional situation", "ProcessedSent": "following point considered pro viding input ddr mandate n shall consistent un approach ddr n important stress national aspect ddr programme also necessary recognize immediate need provide capacitybuilding support increase bring national ownership recognize political difficulty may complicate national ownership transitional situation", "SentID": 2371 @@ -42769,7 +42769,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 763, - "Paragraph": "The inclusion of DDR as a component of the overall UN integrated mission and peace-building support strategy will require the development of initial strategic objectives for the DDR programme to guide further planning and programme development. DDR practitioners shall be required to identify four key elements to create this framework: \\n the overall strategic objectives of UN engagement in DDR in relation to national pri- orities (see Annex C for an example of how DDR aims may be developed); \\n the key DDR tasks of the UN (see Annex C for related DDR tasks that originate from the strategic objectives); \\n an initial organizational and institutional framework (see IDDRS 3.42 on Personnel and Staffing for the establishment of the integrated DDR unit and IDDRS 3.30 on National Institutions for DDR); \\n the identification of other national and international stakeholders on DDR and the areas of engagement of each.", + "Paragraph": "The inclusion of DDR as a component of the overall UN integrated mission and peace-building support strategy will require the development of initial strategic objectives for the DDR programme to guide further planning and programme development. DDR practitioners shall be required to identify four key elements to create this framework: \n the overall strategic objectives of UN engagement in DDR in relation to national pri- orities (see Annex C for an example of how DDR aims may be developed); \n the key DDR tasks of the UN (see Annex C for related DDR tasks that originate from the strategic objectives); \n an initial organizational and institutional framework (see IDDRS 3.42 on Personnel and Staffing for the establishment of the integrated DDR unit and IDDRS 3.30 on National Institutions for DDR); \n the identification of other national and international stakeholders on DDR and the areas of engagement of each.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -42787,7 +42787,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 763, - "Paragraph": "The inclusion of DDR as a component of the overall UN integrated mission and peace-building support strategy will require the development of initial strategic objectives for the DDR programme to guide further planning and programme development. DDR practitioners shall be required to identify four key elements to create this framework: \\n the overall strategic objectives of UN engagement in DDR in relation to national pri- orities (see Annex C for an example of how DDR aims may be developed); \\n the key DDR tasks of the UN (see Annex C for related DDR tasks that originate from the strategic objectives); \\n an initial organizational and institutional framework (see IDDRS 3.42 on Personnel and Staffing for the establishment of the integrated DDR unit and IDDRS 3.30 on National Institutions for DDR); \\n the identification of other national and international stakeholders on DDR and the areas of engagement of each.", + "Paragraph": "The inclusion of DDR as a component of the overall UN integrated mission and peace-building support strategy will require the development of initial strategic objectives for the DDR programme to guide further planning and programme development. DDR practitioners shall be required to identify four key elements to create this framework: \n the overall strategic objectives of UN engagement in DDR in relation to national pri- orities (see Annex C for an example of how DDR aims may be developed); \n the key DDR tasks of the UN (see Annex C for related DDR tasks that originate from the strategic objectives); \n an initial organizational and institutional framework (see IDDRS 3.42 on Personnel and Staffing for the establishment of the integrated DDR unit and IDDRS 3.30 on National Institutions for DDR); \n the identification of other national and international stakeholders on DDR and the areas of engagement of each.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -42798,14 +42798,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3. Phase III: Development of a strategic and policy framework (strategic planning)", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "DDR practitioners shall be required to identify four key elements to create this framework: \\n the overall strategic objectives of UN engagement in DDR in relation to national pri- orities (see Annex C for an example of how DDR aims may be developed); \\n the key DDR tasks of the UN (see Annex C for related DDR tasks that originate from the strategic objectives); \\n an initial organizational and institutional framework (see IDDRS 3.42 on Personnel and Staffing for the establishment of the integrated DDR unit and IDDRS 3.30 on National Institutions for DDR); \\n the identification of other national and international stakeholders on DDR and the areas of engagement of each.", + "Sentence": "DDR practitioners shall be required to identify four key elements to create this framework: \n the overall strategic objectives of UN engagement in DDR in relation to national pri- orities (see Annex C for an example of how DDR aims may be developed); \n the key DDR tasks of the UN (see Annex C for related DDR tasks that originate from the strategic objectives); \n an initial organizational and institutional framework (see IDDRS 3.42 on Personnel and Staffing for the establishment of the integrated DDR unit and IDDRS 3.30 on National Institutions for DDR); \n the identification of other national and international stakeholders on DDR and the areas of engagement of each.", "newParagraph": "inclusion ddr component overall un integrated mission peacebuilding support strategy require development initial strategic objective ddr programme guide planning programme development ddr practitioner shall required identify four key element create framework n overall strategic objective un engagement ddr relation national pri orities see annex c example ddr aim may developed n key ddr task un see annex c related ddr task originate strategic objective n initial organizational institutional framework see iddrs 342 personnel staffing establishment integrated ddr unit iddrs 330 national institution ddr n identification national international stakeholder ddr area engagement", "ProcessedSent": "ddr practitioner shall required identify four key element create framework n overall strategic objective un engagement ddr relation national pri orities see annex c example ddr aim may developed n key ddr task un see annex c related ddr task originate strategic objective n initial organizational institutional framework see iddrs 342 personnel staffing establishment integrated ddr unit iddrs 330 national institution ddr n identification national international stakeholder ddr area engagement", "SentID": 2377 }, { "ParagraphID": 764, - "Paragraph": "The policy and strategy framework for UN support for DDR should ideally be developed after the establishment of the mission, and at the same time as its actual deployment. Several key issues should be kept in mind in developing such a framework: \\n To ensure that this framework adequately reflects country realities and needs with respect to DDR, its development should be a joint effort of mission planners (whether Headquarters- or country-based), DDR staff already deployed and the UN country team; \\n Development of the framework should also involve consultations with relevant national counterparts, to ensure that UN engagement is consistent with national planning and frameworks; \\n The framework should be harmonized \u2014 and integrated \u2014 with other UN and national planning frameworks, notably Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO) results-based budgeting frameworks, UN work plans and transitional appeals, and post-conflict needs assessment processes.", + "Paragraph": "The policy and strategy framework for UN support for DDR should ideally be developed after the establishment of the mission, and at the same time as its actual deployment. Several key issues should be kept in mind in developing such a framework: \n To ensure that this framework adequately reflects country realities and needs with respect to DDR, its development should be a joint effort of mission planners (whether Headquarters- or country-based), DDR staff already deployed and the UN country team; \n Development of the framework should also involve consultations with relevant national counterparts, to ensure that UN engagement is consistent with national planning and frameworks; \n The framework should be harmonized \u2014 and integrated \u2014 with other UN and national planning frameworks, notably Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO) results-based budgeting frameworks, UN work plans and transitional appeals, and post-conflict needs assessment processes.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -42823,7 +42823,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 764, - "Paragraph": "The policy and strategy framework for UN support for DDR should ideally be developed after the establishment of the mission, and at the same time as its actual deployment. Several key issues should be kept in mind in developing such a framework: \\n To ensure that this framework adequately reflects country realities and needs with respect to DDR, its development should be a joint effort of mission planners (whether Headquarters- or country-based), DDR staff already deployed and the UN country team; \\n Development of the framework should also involve consultations with relevant national counterparts, to ensure that UN engagement is consistent with national planning and frameworks; \\n The framework should be harmonized \u2014 and integrated \u2014 with other UN and national planning frameworks, notably Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO) results-based budgeting frameworks, UN work plans and transitional appeals, and post-conflict needs assessment processes.", + "Paragraph": "The policy and strategy framework for UN support for DDR should ideally be developed after the establishment of the mission, and at the same time as its actual deployment. Several key issues should be kept in mind in developing such a framework: \n To ensure that this framework adequately reflects country realities and needs with respect to DDR, its development should be a joint effort of mission planners (whether Headquarters- or country-based), DDR staff already deployed and the UN country team; \n Development of the framework should also involve consultations with relevant national counterparts, to ensure that UN engagement is consistent with national planning and frameworks; \n The framework should be harmonized \u2014 and integrated \u2014 with other UN and national planning frameworks, notably Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO) results-based budgeting frameworks, UN work plans and transitional appeals, and post-conflict needs assessment processes.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -42834,7 +42834,7 @@ "Heading2": "5.3. Phase III: Development of a strategic and policy framework (strategic planning)", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Several key issues should be kept in mind in developing such a framework: \\n To ensure that this framework adequately reflects country realities and needs with respect to DDR, its development should be a joint effort of mission planners (whether Headquarters- or country-based), DDR staff already deployed and the UN country team; \\n Development of the framework should also involve consultations with relevant national counterparts, to ensure that UN engagement is consistent with national planning and frameworks; \\n The framework should be harmonized \u2014 and integrated \u2014 with other UN and national planning frameworks, notably Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO) results-based budgeting frameworks, UN work plans and transitional appeals, and post-conflict needs assessment processes.", + "Sentence": "Several key issues should be kept in mind in developing such a framework: \n To ensure that this framework adequately reflects country realities and needs with respect to DDR, its development should be a joint effort of mission planners (whether Headquarters- or country-based), DDR staff already deployed and the UN country team; \n Development of the framework should also involve consultations with relevant national counterparts, to ensure that UN engagement is consistent with national planning and frameworks; \n The framework should be harmonized \u2014 and integrated \u2014 with other UN and national planning frameworks, notably Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO) results-based budgeting frameworks, UN work plans and transitional appeals, and post-conflict needs assessment processes.", "newParagraph": "policy strategy framework un support ddr ideally developed establishment mission time actual deployment several key issue kept mind developing framework n ensure framework adequately reflects country reality need respect ddr development joint effort mission planner whether headquarters countrybased ddr staff already deployed un country team n development framework also involve consultation relevant national counterpart ensure un engagement consistent national planning framework n framework harmonized integrated un national planning framework notably department peacekeeping operation dpko resultsbased budgeting framework un work plan transitional appeal postconflict need assessment process", "ProcessedSent": "several key issue kept mind developing framework n ensure framework adequately reflects country reality need respect ddr development joint effort mission planner whether headquarters countrybased ddr staff already deployed un country team n development framework also involve consultation relevant national counterpart ensure un engagement consistent national planning framework n framework harmonized integrated un national planning framework notably department peacekeeping operation dpko resultsbased budgeting framework un work plan transitional appeal postconflict need assessment process", "SentID": 2379 @@ -42913,7 +42913,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 767, - "Paragraph": "In general, the programme design cycle should consist of three main phases: \\n Detailed field assessments: A detailed field assessment builds on the initial technical assess- ment described earlier, and is intended to provide a basis for developing the full DDR programme, as well as the implementation and operational plan. The main issues that should be dealt with in a detailed assessment include: \\n\\n the political, social and economic context and background of the armed conflict; \\n\\n the causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \\n\\n the identification of participants, potential partners and others involved; \\n\\n the distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \\n\\n the institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \\n\\n a survey of socio-economic conditions and the capacity of local communities to absorb ex-combatants and their dependants; \\n\\n preconditions and other factors influencing prospects for DDR; \\n\\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation; \\n Detailed programme development and costing of requirements: A DDR \u2018programme\u2019 is a framework that provides an agreed-upon blueprint (i.e., detailed plan) for how DDR will be put into operation in a given context. It also provides the basis for developing operational or implementation plans that provide time-bound information on how individual DDR tasks and activities will be carried out and who will be responsible for doing this. Designing a comprehensive DDR programme is a time- and labour-intensive process that usually takes place after a peacekeeping mission has been authorized and deployment in the field has started. In most cases, the design of a comprehensive UN programme on DDR should be integrated with the design of the national DDR programme and architecture, and linked to the design of programmes in other related sectors as part of the overall transition and recovery plan; \\n Development of an implementation plan: Once a programme has been developed, planning instruments should be developed that will aid practitioners (UN, non-UN and national government) to implement the activities and strategies that have been planned. Depen- ding on the scale and scope of a DDR programme, an implementation or operations plan usually consists of four main elements: implementation methods; time-frame; a detailed work plan; and management arrangements.", + "Paragraph": "In general, the programme design cycle should consist of three main phases: \n Detailed field assessments: A detailed field assessment builds on the initial technical assess- ment described earlier, and is intended to provide a basis for developing the full DDR programme, as well as the implementation and operational plan. The main issues that should be dealt with in a detailed assessment include: \n\n the political, social and economic context and background of the armed conflict; \n\n the causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \n\n the identification of participants, potential partners and others involved; \n\n the distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \n\n the institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \n\n a survey of socio-economic conditions and the capacity of local communities to absorb ex-combatants and their dependants; \n\n preconditions and other factors influencing prospects for DDR; \n\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation; \n Detailed programme development and costing of requirements: A DDR \u2018programme\u2019 is a framework that provides an agreed-upon blueprint (i.e., detailed plan) for how DDR will be put into operation in a given context. It also provides the basis for developing operational or implementation plans that provide time-bound information on how individual DDR tasks and activities will be carried out and who will be responsible for doing this. Designing a comprehensive DDR programme is a time- and labour-intensive process that usually takes place after a peacekeeping mission has been authorized and deployment in the field has started. In most cases, the design of a comprehensive UN programme on DDR should be integrated with the design of the national DDR programme and architecture, and linked to the design of programmes in other related sectors as part of the overall transition and recovery plan; \n Development of an implementation plan: Once a programme has been developed, planning instruments should be developed that will aid practitioners (UN, non-UN and national government) to implement the activities and strategies that have been planned. Depen- ding on the scale and scope of a DDR programme, an implementation or operations plan usually consists of four main elements: implementation methods; time-frame; a detailed work plan; and management arrangements.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -42924,14 +42924,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.4. Phase IV: Development of a programme and operational framework", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "In general, the programme design cycle should consist of three main phases: \\n Detailed field assessments: A detailed field assessment builds on the initial technical assess- ment described earlier, and is intended to provide a basis for developing the full DDR programme, as well as the implementation and operational plan.", + "Sentence": "In general, the programme design cycle should consist of three main phases: \n Detailed field assessments: A detailed field assessment builds on the initial technical assess- ment described earlier, and is intended to provide a basis for developing the full DDR programme, as well as the implementation and operational plan.", "newParagraph": "general programme design cycle consist three main phase n detailed field assessment detailed field assessment build initial technical ass ment described earlier intended provide basis developing full ddr programme well implementation operational plan main issue dealt detailed assessment include nn political social economic context background armed conflict nn cause dynamic consequence armed conflict nn identification participant potential partner others involved nn distribution availability proliferation weapon primarily small arm light weapon nn institutional capacity national stakeholder area related ddr nn survey socioeconomic condition capacity local community absorb excombatants dependant nn precondition factor influencing prospect ddr nn baseline data performance indicator programme design implementation monitoring evaluation n detailed programme development costing requirement ddr programme framework provides agreedupon blueprint ie detailed plan ddr put operation given context also provides basis developing operational implementation plan provide timebound information individual ddr task activity carried responsible designing comprehensive ddr programme time labourintensive process usually take place peacekeeping mission authorized deployment field started case design comprehensive un programme ddr integrated design national ddr programme architecture linked design programme related sector part overall transition recovery plan n development implementation plan programme developed planning instrument developed aid practitioner un nonun national government implement activity strategy planned depen ding scale scope ddr programme implementation operation plan usually consists four main element implementation method timeframe detailed work plan management arrangement", "ProcessedSent": "general programme design cycle consist three main phase n detailed field assessment detailed field assessment build initial technical ass ment described earlier intended provide basis developing full ddr programme well implementation operational plan", "SentID": 2384 }, { "ParagraphID": 767, - "Paragraph": "In general, the programme design cycle should consist of three main phases: \\n Detailed field assessments: A detailed field assessment builds on the initial technical assess- ment described earlier, and is intended to provide a basis for developing the full DDR programme, as well as the implementation and operational plan. The main issues that should be dealt with in a detailed assessment include: \\n\\n the political, social and economic context and background of the armed conflict; \\n\\n the causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \\n\\n the identification of participants, potential partners and others involved; \\n\\n the distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \\n\\n the institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \\n\\n a survey of socio-economic conditions and the capacity of local communities to absorb ex-combatants and their dependants; \\n\\n preconditions and other factors influencing prospects for DDR; \\n\\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation; \\n Detailed programme development and costing of requirements: A DDR \u2018programme\u2019 is a framework that provides an agreed-upon blueprint (i.e., detailed plan) for how DDR will be put into operation in a given context. It also provides the basis for developing operational or implementation plans that provide time-bound information on how individual DDR tasks and activities will be carried out and who will be responsible for doing this. Designing a comprehensive DDR programme is a time- and labour-intensive process that usually takes place after a peacekeeping mission has been authorized and deployment in the field has started. In most cases, the design of a comprehensive UN programme on DDR should be integrated with the design of the national DDR programme and architecture, and linked to the design of programmes in other related sectors as part of the overall transition and recovery plan; \\n Development of an implementation plan: Once a programme has been developed, planning instruments should be developed that will aid practitioners (UN, non-UN and national government) to implement the activities and strategies that have been planned. Depen- ding on the scale and scope of a DDR programme, an implementation or operations plan usually consists of four main elements: implementation methods; time-frame; a detailed work plan; and management arrangements.", + "Paragraph": "In general, the programme design cycle should consist of three main phases: \n Detailed field assessments: A detailed field assessment builds on the initial technical assess- ment described earlier, and is intended to provide a basis for developing the full DDR programme, as well as the implementation and operational plan. The main issues that should be dealt with in a detailed assessment include: \n\n the political, social and economic context and background of the armed conflict; \n\n the causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \n\n the identification of participants, potential partners and others involved; \n\n the distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \n\n the institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \n\n a survey of socio-economic conditions and the capacity of local communities to absorb ex-combatants and their dependants; \n\n preconditions and other factors influencing prospects for DDR; \n\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation; \n Detailed programme development and costing of requirements: A DDR \u2018programme\u2019 is a framework that provides an agreed-upon blueprint (i.e., detailed plan) for how DDR will be put into operation in a given context. It also provides the basis for developing operational or implementation plans that provide time-bound information on how individual DDR tasks and activities will be carried out and who will be responsible for doing this. Designing a comprehensive DDR programme is a time- and labour-intensive process that usually takes place after a peacekeeping mission has been authorized and deployment in the field has started. In most cases, the design of a comprehensive UN programme on DDR should be integrated with the design of the national DDR programme and architecture, and linked to the design of programmes in other related sectors as part of the overall transition and recovery plan; \n Development of an implementation plan: Once a programme has been developed, planning instruments should be developed that will aid practitioners (UN, non-UN and national government) to implement the activities and strategies that have been planned. Depen- ding on the scale and scope of a DDR programme, an implementation or operations plan usually consists of four main elements: implementation methods; time-frame; a detailed work plan; and management arrangements.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -42942,14 +42942,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.4. Phase IV: Development of a programme and operational framework", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The main issues that should be dealt with in a detailed assessment include: \\n\\n the political, social and economic context and background of the armed conflict; \\n\\n the causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \\n\\n the identification of participants, potential partners and others involved; \\n\\n the distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \\n\\n the institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \\n\\n a survey of socio-economic conditions and the capacity of local communities to absorb ex-combatants and their dependants; \\n\\n preconditions and other factors influencing prospects for DDR; \\n\\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation; \\n Detailed programme development and costing of requirements: A DDR \u2018programme\u2019 is a framework that provides an agreed-upon blueprint (i.e., detailed plan) for how DDR will be put into operation in a given context.", + "Sentence": "The main issues that should be dealt with in a detailed assessment include: \n\n the political, social and economic context and background of the armed conflict; \n\n the causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \n\n the identification of participants, potential partners and others involved; \n\n the distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \n\n the institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \n\n a survey of socio-economic conditions and the capacity of local communities to absorb ex-combatants and their dependants; \n\n preconditions and other factors influencing prospects for DDR; \n\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation; \n Detailed programme development and costing of requirements: A DDR \u2018programme\u2019 is a framework that provides an agreed-upon blueprint (i.e., detailed plan) for how DDR will be put into operation in a given context.", "newParagraph": "general programme design cycle consist three main phase n detailed field assessment detailed field assessment build initial technical ass ment described earlier intended provide basis developing full ddr programme well implementation operational plan main issue dealt detailed assessment include nn political social economic context background armed conflict nn cause dynamic consequence armed conflict nn identification participant potential partner others involved nn distribution availability proliferation weapon primarily small arm light weapon nn institutional capacity national stakeholder area related ddr nn survey socioeconomic condition capacity local community absorb excombatants dependant nn precondition factor influencing prospect ddr nn baseline data performance indicator programme design implementation monitoring evaluation n detailed programme development costing requirement ddr programme framework provides agreedupon blueprint ie detailed plan ddr put operation given context also provides basis developing operational implementation plan provide timebound information individual ddr task activity carried responsible designing comprehensive ddr programme time labourintensive process usually take place peacekeeping mission authorized deployment field started case design comprehensive un programme ddr integrated design national ddr programme architecture linked design programme related sector part overall transition recovery plan n development implementation plan programme developed planning instrument developed aid practitioner un nonun national government implement activity strategy planned depen ding scale scope ddr programme implementation operation plan usually consists four main element implementation method timeframe detailed work plan management arrangement", "ProcessedSent": "main issue dealt detailed assessment include nn political social economic context background armed conflict nn cause dynamic consequence armed conflict nn identification participant potential partner others involved nn distribution availability proliferation weapon primarily small arm light weapon nn institutional capacity national stakeholder area related ddr nn survey socioeconomic condition capacity local community absorb excombatants dependant nn precondition factor influencing prospect ddr nn baseline data performance indicator programme design implementation monitoring evaluation n detailed programme development costing requirement ddr programme framework provides agreedupon blueprint ie detailed plan ddr put operation given context", "SentID": 2385 }, { "ParagraphID": 767, - "Paragraph": "In general, the programme design cycle should consist of three main phases: \\n Detailed field assessments: A detailed field assessment builds on the initial technical assess- ment described earlier, and is intended to provide a basis for developing the full DDR programme, as well as the implementation and operational plan. The main issues that should be dealt with in a detailed assessment include: \\n\\n the political, social and economic context and background of the armed conflict; \\n\\n the causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \\n\\n the identification of participants, potential partners and others involved; \\n\\n the distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \\n\\n the institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \\n\\n a survey of socio-economic conditions and the capacity of local communities to absorb ex-combatants and their dependants; \\n\\n preconditions and other factors influencing prospects for DDR; \\n\\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation; \\n Detailed programme development and costing of requirements: A DDR \u2018programme\u2019 is a framework that provides an agreed-upon blueprint (i.e., detailed plan) for how DDR will be put into operation in a given context. It also provides the basis for developing operational or implementation plans that provide time-bound information on how individual DDR tasks and activities will be carried out and who will be responsible for doing this. Designing a comprehensive DDR programme is a time- and labour-intensive process that usually takes place after a peacekeeping mission has been authorized and deployment in the field has started. In most cases, the design of a comprehensive UN programme on DDR should be integrated with the design of the national DDR programme and architecture, and linked to the design of programmes in other related sectors as part of the overall transition and recovery plan; \\n Development of an implementation plan: Once a programme has been developed, planning instruments should be developed that will aid practitioners (UN, non-UN and national government) to implement the activities and strategies that have been planned. Depen- ding on the scale and scope of a DDR programme, an implementation or operations plan usually consists of four main elements: implementation methods; time-frame; a detailed work plan; and management arrangements.", + "Paragraph": "In general, the programme design cycle should consist of three main phases: \n Detailed field assessments: A detailed field assessment builds on the initial technical assess- ment described earlier, and is intended to provide a basis for developing the full DDR programme, as well as the implementation and operational plan. The main issues that should be dealt with in a detailed assessment include: \n\n the political, social and economic context and background of the armed conflict; \n\n the causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \n\n the identification of participants, potential partners and others involved; \n\n the distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \n\n the institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \n\n a survey of socio-economic conditions and the capacity of local communities to absorb ex-combatants and their dependants; \n\n preconditions and other factors influencing prospects for DDR; \n\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation; \n Detailed programme development and costing of requirements: A DDR \u2018programme\u2019 is a framework that provides an agreed-upon blueprint (i.e., detailed plan) for how DDR will be put into operation in a given context. It also provides the basis for developing operational or implementation plans that provide time-bound information on how individual DDR tasks and activities will be carried out and who will be responsible for doing this. Designing a comprehensive DDR programme is a time- and labour-intensive process that usually takes place after a peacekeeping mission has been authorized and deployment in the field has started. In most cases, the design of a comprehensive UN programme on DDR should be integrated with the design of the national DDR programme and architecture, and linked to the design of programmes in other related sectors as part of the overall transition and recovery plan; \n Development of an implementation plan: Once a programme has been developed, planning instruments should be developed that will aid practitioners (UN, non-UN and national government) to implement the activities and strategies that have been planned. Depen- ding on the scale and scope of a DDR programme, an implementation or operations plan usually consists of four main elements: implementation methods; time-frame; a detailed work plan; and management arrangements.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -42967,7 +42967,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 767, - "Paragraph": "In general, the programme design cycle should consist of three main phases: \\n Detailed field assessments: A detailed field assessment builds on the initial technical assess- ment described earlier, and is intended to provide a basis for developing the full DDR programme, as well as the implementation and operational plan. The main issues that should be dealt with in a detailed assessment include: \\n\\n the political, social and economic context and background of the armed conflict; \\n\\n the causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \\n\\n the identification of participants, potential partners and others involved; \\n\\n the distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \\n\\n the institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \\n\\n a survey of socio-economic conditions and the capacity of local communities to absorb ex-combatants and their dependants; \\n\\n preconditions and other factors influencing prospects for DDR; \\n\\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation; \\n Detailed programme development and costing of requirements: A DDR \u2018programme\u2019 is a framework that provides an agreed-upon blueprint (i.e., detailed plan) for how DDR will be put into operation in a given context. It also provides the basis for developing operational or implementation plans that provide time-bound information on how individual DDR tasks and activities will be carried out and who will be responsible for doing this. Designing a comprehensive DDR programme is a time- and labour-intensive process that usually takes place after a peacekeeping mission has been authorized and deployment in the field has started. In most cases, the design of a comprehensive UN programme on DDR should be integrated with the design of the national DDR programme and architecture, and linked to the design of programmes in other related sectors as part of the overall transition and recovery plan; \\n Development of an implementation plan: Once a programme has been developed, planning instruments should be developed that will aid practitioners (UN, non-UN and national government) to implement the activities and strategies that have been planned. Depen- ding on the scale and scope of a DDR programme, an implementation or operations plan usually consists of four main elements: implementation methods; time-frame; a detailed work plan; and management arrangements.", + "Paragraph": "In general, the programme design cycle should consist of three main phases: \n Detailed field assessments: A detailed field assessment builds on the initial technical assess- ment described earlier, and is intended to provide a basis for developing the full DDR programme, as well as the implementation and operational plan. The main issues that should be dealt with in a detailed assessment include: \n\n the political, social and economic context and background of the armed conflict; \n\n the causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \n\n the identification of participants, potential partners and others involved; \n\n the distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \n\n the institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \n\n a survey of socio-economic conditions and the capacity of local communities to absorb ex-combatants and their dependants; \n\n preconditions and other factors influencing prospects for DDR; \n\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation; \n Detailed programme development and costing of requirements: A DDR \u2018programme\u2019 is a framework that provides an agreed-upon blueprint (i.e., detailed plan) for how DDR will be put into operation in a given context. It also provides the basis for developing operational or implementation plans that provide time-bound information on how individual DDR tasks and activities will be carried out and who will be responsible for doing this. Designing a comprehensive DDR programme is a time- and labour-intensive process that usually takes place after a peacekeeping mission has been authorized and deployment in the field has started. In most cases, the design of a comprehensive UN programme on DDR should be integrated with the design of the national DDR programme and architecture, and linked to the design of programmes in other related sectors as part of the overall transition and recovery plan; \n Development of an implementation plan: Once a programme has been developed, planning instruments should be developed that will aid practitioners (UN, non-UN and national government) to implement the activities and strategies that have been planned. Depen- ding on the scale and scope of a DDR programme, an implementation or operations plan usually consists of four main elements: implementation methods; time-frame; a detailed work plan; and management arrangements.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -42985,7 +42985,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 767, - "Paragraph": "In general, the programme design cycle should consist of three main phases: \\n Detailed field assessments: A detailed field assessment builds on the initial technical assess- ment described earlier, and is intended to provide a basis for developing the full DDR programme, as well as the implementation and operational plan. The main issues that should be dealt with in a detailed assessment include: \\n\\n the political, social and economic context and background of the armed conflict; \\n\\n the causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \\n\\n the identification of participants, potential partners and others involved; \\n\\n the distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \\n\\n the institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \\n\\n a survey of socio-economic conditions and the capacity of local communities to absorb ex-combatants and their dependants; \\n\\n preconditions and other factors influencing prospects for DDR; \\n\\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation; \\n Detailed programme development and costing of requirements: A DDR \u2018programme\u2019 is a framework that provides an agreed-upon blueprint (i.e., detailed plan) for how DDR will be put into operation in a given context. It also provides the basis for developing operational or implementation plans that provide time-bound information on how individual DDR tasks and activities will be carried out and who will be responsible for doing this. Designing a comprehensive DDR programme is a time- and labour-intensive process that usually takes place after a peacekeeping mission has been authorized and deployment in the field has started. In most cases, the design of a comprehensive UN programme on DDR should be integrated with the design of the national DDR programme and architecture, and linked to the design of programmes in other related sectors as part of the overall transition and recovery plan; \\n Development of an implementation plan: Once a programme has been developed, planning instruments should be developed that will aid practitioners (UN, non-UN and national government) to implement the activities and strategies that have been planned. Depen- ding on the scale and scope of a DDR programme, an implementation or operations plan usually consists of four main elements: implementation methods; time-frame; a detailed work plan; and management arrangements.", + "Paragraph": "In general, the programme design cycle should consist of three main phases: \n Detailed field assessments: A detailed field assessment builds on the initial technical assess- ment described earlier, and is intended to provide a basis for developing the full DDR programme, as well as the implementation and operational plan. The main issues that should be dealt with in a detailed assessment include: \n\n the political, social and economic context and background of the armed conflict; \n\n the causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \n\n the identification of participants, potential partners and others involved; \n\n the distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \n\n the institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \n\n a survey of socio-economic conditions and the capacity of local communities to absorb ex-combatants and their dependants; \n\n preconditions and other factors influencing prospects for DDR; \n\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation; \n Detailed programme development and costing of requirements: A DDR \u2018programme\u2019 is a framework that provides an agreed-upon blueprint (i.e., detailed plan) for how DDR will be put into operation in a given context. It also provides the basis for developing operational or implementation plans that provide time-bound information on how individual DDR tasks and activities will be carried out and who will be responsible for doing this. Designing a comprehensive DDR programme is a time- and labour-intensive process that usually takes place after a peacekeeping mission has been authorized and deployment in the field has started. In most cases, the design of a comprehensive UN programme on DDR should be integrated with the design of the national DDR programme and architecture, and linked to the design of programmes in other related sectors as part of the overall transition and recovery plan; \n Development of an implementation plan: Once a programme has been developed, planning instruments should be developed that will aid practitioners (UN, non-UN and national government) to implement the activities and strategies that have been planned. Depen- ding on the scale and scope of a DDR programme, an implementation or operations plan usually consists of four main elements: implementation methods; time-frame; a detailed work plan; and management arrangements.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -42996,14 +42996,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.4. Phase IV: Development of a programme and operational framework", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "In most cases, the design of a comprehensive UN programme on DDR should be integrated with the design of the national DDR programme and architecture, and linked to the design of programmes in other related sectors as part of the overall transition and recovery plan; \\n Development of an implementation plan: Once a programme has been developed, planning instruments should be developed that will aid practitioners (UN, non-UN and national government) to implement the activities and strategies that have been planned.", + "Sentence": "In most cases, the design of a comprehensive UN programme on DDR should be integrated with the design of the national DDR programme and architecture, and linked to the design of programmes in other related sectors as part of the overall transition and recovery plan; \n Development of an implementation plan: Once a programme has been developed, planning instruments should be developed that will aid practitioners (UN, non-UN and national government) to implement the activities and strategies that have been planned.", "newParagraph": "general programme design cycle consist three main phase n detailed field assessment detailed field assessment build initial technical ass ment described earlier intended provide basis developing full ddr programme well implementation operational plan main issue dealt detailed assessment include nn political social economic context background armed conflict nn cause dynamic consequence armed conflict nn identification participant potential partner others involved nn distribution availability proliferation weapon primarily small arm light weapon nn institutional capacity national stakeholder area related ddr nn survey socioeconomic condition capacity local community absorb excombatants dependant nn precondition factor influencing prospect ddr nn baseline data performance indicator programme design implementation monitoring evaluation n detailed programme development costing requirement ddr programme framework provides agreedupon blueprint ie detailed plan ddr put operation given context also provides basis developing operational implementation plan provide timebound information individual ddr task activity carried responsible designing comprehensive ddr programme time labourintensive process usually take place peacekeeping mission authorized deployment field started case design comprehensive un programme ddr integrated design national ddr programme architecture linked design programme related sector part overall transition recovery plan n development implementation plan programme developed planning instrument developed aid practitioner un nonun national government implement activity strategy planned depen ding scale scope ddr programme implementation operation plan usually consists four main element implementation method timeframe detailed work plan management arrangement", "ProcessedSent": "case design comprehensive un programme ddr integrated design national ddr programme architecture linked design programme related sector part overall transition recovery plan n development implementation plan programme developed planning instrument developed aid practitioner un nonun national government implement activity strategy planned", "SentID": 2388 }, { "ParagraphID": 767, - "Paragraph": "In general, the programme design cycle should consist of three main phases: \\n Detailed field assessments: A detailed field assessment builds on the initial technical assess- ment described earlier, and is intended to provide a basis for developing the full DDR programme, as well as the implementation and operational plan. The main issues that should be dealt with in a detailed assessment include: \\n\\n the political, social and economic context and background of the armed conflict; \\n\\n the causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \\n\\n the identification of participants, potential partners and others involved; \\n\\n the distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \\n\\n the institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \\n\\n a survey of socio-economic conditions and the capacity of local communities to absorb ex-combatants and their dependants; \\n\\n preconditions and other factors influencing prospects for DDR; \\n\\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation; \\n Detailed programme development and costing of requirements: A DDR \u2018programme\u2019 is a framework that provides an agreed-upon blueprint (i.e., detailed plan) for how DDR will be put into operation in a given context. It also provides the basis for developing operational or implementation plans that provide time-bound information on how individual DDR tasks and activities will be carried out and who will be responsible for doing this. Designing a comprehensive DDR programme is a time- and labour-intensive process that usually takes place after a peacekeeping mission has been authorized and deployment in the field has started. In most cases, the design of a comprehensive UN programme on DDR should be integrated with the design of the national DDR programme and architecture, and linked to the design of programmes in other related sectors as part of the overall transition and recovery plan; \\n Development of an implementation plan: Once a programme has been developed, planning instruments should be developed that will aid practitioners (UN, non-UN and national government) to implement the activities and strategies that have been planned. Depen- ding on the scale and scope of a DDR programme, an implementation or operations plan usually consists of four main elements: implementation methods; time-frame; a detailed work plan; and management arrangements.", + "Paragraph": "In general, the programme design cycle should consist of three main phases: \n Detailed field assessments: A detailed field assessment builds on the initial technical assess- ment described earlier, and is intended to provide a basis for developing the full DDR programme, as well as the implementation and operational plan. The main issues that should be dealt with in a detailed assessment include: \n\n the political, social and economic context and background of the armed conflict; \n\n the causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \n\n the identification of participants, potential partners and others involved; \n\n the distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \n\n the institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \n\n a survey of socio-economic conditions and the capacity of local communities to absorb ex-combatants and their dependants; \n\n preconditions and other factors influencing prospects for DDR; \n\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation; \n Detailed programme development and costing of requirements: A DDR \u2018programme\u2019 is a framework that provides an agreed-upon blueprint (i.e., detailed plan) for how DDR will be put into operation in a given context. It also provides the basis for developing operational or implementation plans that provide time-bound information on how individual DDR tasks and activities will be carried out and who will be responsible for doing this. Designing a comprehensive DDR programme is a time- and labour-intensive process that usually takes place after a peacekeeping mission has been authorized and deployment in the field has started. In most cases, the design of a comprehensive UN programme on DDR should be integrated with the design of the national DDR programme and architecture, and linked to the design of programmes in other related sectors as part of the overall transition and recovery plan; \n Development of an implementation plan: Once a programme has been developed, planning instruments should be developed that will aid practitioners (UN, non-UN and national government) to implement the activities and strategies that have been planned. Depen- ding on the scale and scope of a DDR programme, an implementation or operations plan usually consists of four main elements: implementation methods; time-frame; a detailed work plan; and management arrangements.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -43561,7 +43561,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 784, - "Paragraph": "This will include developing a good understanding of the following: \\n the UN approach to DDR issues; \\n an overview of the regional conflict map; neighbouring States\u2019 political, commercial and security interests, etc.; \\n the country situation, including the number and availability of small arms and light weapons;1 \\n existing work being performed by the UN country team and other partners, such as the World Bank and non-governmental organizations (NGOs); \\n existing provisions for DDR within current security arrangements or peace agreements signed between parties to the conflict; \\n the experience of previous DDR operations (if any) and the role of regional organiza- tions and interested Member States.", + "Paragraph": "This will include developing a good understanding of the following: \n the UN approach to DDR issues; \n an overview of the regional conflict map; neighbouring States\u2019 political, commercial and security interests, etc.; \n the country situation, including the number and availability of small arms and light weapons;1 \n existing work being performed by the UN country team and other partners, such as the World Bank and non-governmental organizations (NGOs); \n existing provisions for DDR within current security arrangements or peace agreements signed between parties to the conflict; \n the experience of previous DDR operations (if any) and the role of regional organiza- tions and interested Member States.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -43572,14 +43572,14 @@ "Heading2": "Preparation", "Heading3": "Background information", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This will include developing a good understanding of the following: \\n the UN approach to DDR issues; \\n an overview of the regional conflict map; neighbouring States\u2019 political, commercial and security interests, etc.", + "Sentence": "This will include developing a good understanding of the following: \n the UN approach to DDR issues; \n an overview of the regional conflict map; neighbouring States\u2019 political, commercial and security interests, etc.", "newParagraph": "include developing good understanding following n un approach ddr issue n overview regional conflict map neighbouring state political commercial security interest etc n country situation including number availability small arm light weapons1 n existing work performed un country team partner world bank nongovernmental organization ngo n existing provision ddr within current security arrangement peace agreement signed party conflict n experience previous ddr operation role regional organiza tions interested member state", "ProcessedSent": "include developing good understanding following n un approach ddr issue n overview regional conflict map neighbouring state political commercial security interest etc", "SentID": 2420 }, { "ParagraphID": 784, - "Paragraph": "This will include developing a good understanding of the following: \\n the UN approach to DDR issues; \\n an overview of the regional conflict map; neighbouring States\u2019 political, commercial and security interests, etc.; \\n the country situation, including the number and availability of small arms and light weapons;1 \\n existing work being performed by the UN country team and other partners, such as the World Bank and non-governmental organizations (NGOs); \\n existing provisions for DDR within current security arrangements or peace agreements signed between parties to the conflict; \\n the experience of previous DDR operations (if any) and the role of regional organiza- tions and interested Member States.", + "Paragraph": "This will include developing a good understanding of the following: \n the UN approach to DDR issues; \n an overview of the regional conflict map; neighbouring States\u2019 political, commercial and security interests, etc.; \n the country situation, including the number and availability of small arms and light weapons;1 \n existing work being performed by the UN country team and other partners, such as the World Bank and non-governmental organizations (NGOs); \n existing provisions for DDR within current security arrangements or peace agreements signed between parties to the conflict; \n the experience of previous DDR operations (if any) and the role of regional organiza- tions and interested Member States.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -43590,14 +43590,14 @@ "Heading2": "Preparation", "Heading3": "Background information", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "; \\n the country situation, including the number and availability of small arms and light weapons;1 \\n existing work being performed by the UN country team and other partners, such as the World Bank and non-governmental organizations (NGOs); \\n existing provisions for DDR within current security arrangements or peace agreements signed between parties to the conflict; \\n the experience of previous DDR operations (if any) and the role of regional organiza- tions and interested Member States.", + "Sentence": "; \n the country situation, including the number and availability of small arms and light weapons;1 \n existing work being performed by the UN country team and other partners, such as the World Bank and non-governmental organizations (NGOs); \n existing provisions for DDR within current security arrangements or peace agreements signed between parties to the conflict; \n the experience of previous DDR operations (if any) and the role of regional organiza- tions and interested Member States.", "newParagraph": "include developing good understanding following n un approach ddr issue n overview regional conflict map neighbouring state political commercial security interest etc n country situation including number availability small arm light weapons1 n existing work performed un country team partner world bank nongovernmental organization ngo n existing provision ddr within current security arrangement peace agreement signed party conflict n experience previous ddr operation role regional organiza tions interested member state", "ProcessedSent": " n country situation including number availability small arm light weapons1 n existing work performed un country team partner world bank nongovernmental organization ngo n existing provision ddr within current security arrangement peace agreement signed party conflict n experience previous ddr operation role regional organiza tions interested member state", "SentID": 2421 }, { "ParagraphID": 785, - "Paragraph": "Staff members on a DDR assessment visit should plan to meet with representatives from: \\n the parties to the conflict at the political and military levels; \\n members of the government; \\n civil society (such as political parties, church groups, women\u2019s organizations, local NGOs, etc.); \\n regional mediators or regional organizations, including monitoring bodies; \n interested Member States supporting the peace process; \\n members of the UN country team and international organizations; \\n major international NGOs.", + "Paragraph": "Staff members on a DDR assessment visit should plan to meet with representatives from: \n the parties to the conflict at the political and military levels; \n members of the government; \n civil society (such as political parties, church groups, women\u2019s organizations, local NGOs, etc.); \n regional mediators or regional organizations, including monitoring bodies; \n interested Member States supporting the peace process; \n members of the UN country team and international organizations; \n major international NGOs.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -43608,14 +43608,14 @@ "Heading2": "Preparation", "Heading3": "Meetings", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Staff members on a DDR assessment visit should plan to meet with representatives from: \\n the parties to the conflict at the political and military levels; \\n members of the government; \\n civil society (such as political parties, church groups, women\u2019s organizations, local NGOs, etc.", + "Sentence": "Staff members on a DDR assessment visit should plan to meet with representatives from: \n the parties to the conflict at the political and military levels; \n members of the government; \n civil society (such as political parties, church groups, women\u2019s organizations, local NGOs, etc.", "newParagraph": "staff member ddr assessment visit plan meet representative n party conflict political military level n member government n civil society political party church group woman organization local ngo etc n regional mediator regional organization including monitoring body interested member state supporting peace process n member un country team international organization n major international ngo", "ProcessedSent": "staff member ddr assessment visit plan meet representative n party conflict political military level n member government n civil society political party church group woman organization local ngo etc", "SentID": 2422 }, { "ParagraphID": 785, - "Paragraph": "Staff members on a DDR assessment visit should plan to meet with representatives from: \\n the parties to the conflict at the political and military levels; \\n members of the government; \\n civil society (such as political parties, church groups, women\u2019s organizations, local NGOs, etc.); \\n regional mediators or regional organizations, including monitoring bodies; \n interested Member States supporting the peace process; \\n members of the UN country team and international organizations; \\n major international NGOs.", + "Paragraph": "Staff members on a DDR assessment visit should plan to meet with representatives from: \n the parties to the conflict at the political and military levels; \n members of the government; \n civil society (such as political parties, church groups, women\u2019s organizations, local NGOs, etc.); \n regional mediators or regional organizations, including monitoring bodies; \n interested Member States supporting the peace process; \n members of the UN country team and international organizations; \n major international NGOs.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -43626,14 +43626,14 @@ "Heading2": "Preparation", "Heading3": "Meetings", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "); \\n regional mediators or regional organizations, including monitoring bodies; \n interested Member States supporting the peace process; \\n members of the UN country team and international organizations; \\n major international NGOs.", + "Sentence": "); \n regional mediators or regional organizations, including monitoring bodies; \n interested Member States supporting the peace process; \n members of the UN country team and international organizations; \n major international NGOs.", "newParagraph": "staff member ddr assessment visit plan meet representative n party conflict political military level n member government n civil society political party church group woman organization local ngo etc n regional mediator regional organization including monitoring body interested member state supporting peace process n member un country team international organization n major international ngo", "ProcessedSent": " n regional mediator regional organization including monitoring body interested member state supporting peace process n member un country team international organization n major international ngo", "SentID": 2423 }, { "ParagraphID": 786, - "Paragraph": "The aim of the assessment mission is to develop an in-depth understanding of the key DDR-related areas, in order to ensure efficient, effective and timely planning and resource mobilization for the DDR programme. The DDR staff member(s) of a DDR assessment mission should develop a good understanding of the following areas: \\n the legal framework for the DDR programme, i.e., the peace agreement; \\n specifically designated groups that will participate in the DDR programme; \\n the DDR planning and implementation context; \\n international, regional and national implementing partners; \\n methods for implementing the different phases of the DDR programme; \\n a public information strategy for distributing information about the DDR programme; \\n military\/police- and security-related DDR tasks; \\n administrative and logistic support requirements.", + "Paragraph": "The aim of the assessment mission is to develop an in-depth understanding of the key DDR-related areas, in order to ensure efficient, effective and timely planning and resource mobilization for the DDR programme. The DDR staff member(s) of a DDR assessment mission should develop a good understanding of the following areas: \n the legal framework for the DDR programme, i.e., the peace agreement; \n specifically designated groups that will participate in the DDR programme; \n the DDR planning and implementation context; \n international, regional and national implementing partners; \n methods for implementing the different phases of the DDR programme; \n a public information strategy for distributing information about the DDR programme; \n military\/police- and security-related DDR tasks; \n administrative and logistic support requirements.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -43651,7 +43651,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 786, - "Paragraph": "The aim of the assessment mission is to develop an in-depth understanding of the key DDR-related areas, in order to ensure efficient, effective and timely planning and resource mobilization for the DDR programme. The DDR staff member(s) of a DDR assessment mission should develop a good understanding of the following areas: \\n the legal framework for the DDR programme, i.e., the peace agreement; \\n specifically designated groups that will participate in the DDR programme; \\n the DDR planning and implementation context; \\n international, regional and national implementing partners; \\n methods for implementing the different phases of the DDR programme; \\n a public information strategy for distributing information about the DDR programme; \\n military\/police- and security-related DDR tasks; \\n administrative and logistic support requirements.", + "Paragraph": "The aim of the assessment mission is to develop an in-depth understanding of the key DDR-related areas, in order to ensure efficient, effective and timely planning and resource mobilization for the DDR programme. The DDR staff member(s) of a DDR assessment mission should develop a good understanding of the following areas: \n the legal framework for the DDR programme, i.e., the peace agreement; \n specifically designated groups that will participate in the DDR programme; \n the DDR planning and implementation context; \n international, regional and national implementing partners; \n methods for implementing the different phases of the DDR programme; \n a public information strategy for distributing information about the DDR programme; \n military\/police- and security-related DDR tasks; \n administrative and logistic support requirements.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -43662,7 +43662,7 @@ "Heading2": "Conduct of the DDR assessment mission", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The DDR staff member(s) of a DDR assessment mission should develop a good understanding of the following areas: \\n the legal framework for the DDR programme, i.e., the peace agreement; \\n specifically designated groups that will participate in the DDR programme; \\n the DDR planning and implementation context; \\n international, regional and national implementing partners; \\n methods for implementing the different phases of the DDR programme; \\n a public information strategy for distributing information about the DDR programme; \\n military\/police- and security-related DDR tasks; \\n administrative and logistic support requirements.", + "Sentence": "The DDR staff member(s) of a DDR assessment mission should develop a good understanding of the following areas: \n the legal framework for the DDR programme, i.e., the peace agreement; \n specifically designated groups that will participate in the DDR programme; \n the DDR planning and implementation context; \n international, regional and national implementing partners; \n methods for implementing the different phases of the DDR programme; \n a public information strategy for distributing information about the DDR programme; \n military\/police- and security-related DDR tasks; \n administrative and logistic support requirements.", "newParagraph": "aim assessment mission develop indepth understanding key ddrrelated area order ensure efficient effective timely planning resource mobilization ddr programme ddr staff member ddr assessment mission develop good understanding following area n legal framework ddr programme ie peace agreement n specifically designated group participate ddr programme n ddr planning implementation context n international regional national implementing partner n method implementing different phase ddr programme n public information strategy distributing information ddr programme n militarypolice securityrelated ddr task n administrative logistic support requirement", "ProcessedSent": "ddr staff member ddr assessment mission develop good understanding following area n legal framework ddr programme ie peace agreement n specifically designated group participate ddr programme n ddr planning implementation context n international regional national implementing partner n method implementing different phase ddr programme n public information strategy distributing information ddr programme n militarypolice securityrelated ddr task n administrative logistic support requirement", "SentID": 2425 @@ -44569,7 +44569,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 802, - "Paragraph": "The character, size, composition and location of the groups specifically identified for DDR are among the required details that are often not included the legal framework, but which are essential to the development and implementation of a DDR programme. In consultation with the parties and other implementing partners on the ground, the assessment mission should develop a detailed picture of: \\n WHO will be disarmed, demobilized and reintegrated; \\n WHAT weapons are to be collected, destroyed and disposed of; \\n WHERE in the country the identified groups are situated, and where those being dis- armed and demobilized will be resettled or repatriated to; \\n WHEN DDR will (or can) take place, and in what sequence for which identified groups, including the priority of action for the different identified groups.", + "Paragraph": "The character, size, composition and location of the groups specifically identified for DDR are among the required details that are often not included the legal framework, but which are essential to the development and implementation of a DDR programme. In consultation with the parties and other implementing partners on the ground, the assessment mission should develop a detailed picture of: \n WHO will be disarmed, demobilized and reintegrated; \n WHAT weapons are to be collected, destroyed and disposed of; \n WHERE in the country the identified groups are situated, and where those being dis- armed and demobilized will be resettled or repatriated to; \n WHEN DDR will (or can) take place, and in what sequence for which identified groups, including the priority of action for the different identified groups.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -44587,7 +44587,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 802, - "Paragraph": "The character, size, composition and location of the groups specifically identified for DDR are among the required details that are often not included the legal framework, but which are essential to the development and implementation of a DDR programme. In consultation with the parties and other implementing partners on the ground, the assessment mission should develop a detailed picture of: \\n WHO will be disarmed, demobilized and reintegrated; \\n WHAT weapons are to be collected, destroyed and disposed of; \\n WHERE in the country the identified groups are situated, and where those being dis- armed and demobilized will be resettled or repatriated to; \\n WHEN DDR will (or can) take place, and in what sequence for which identified groups, including the priority of action for the different identified groups.", + "Paragraph": "The character, size, composition and location of the groups specifically identified for DDR are among the required details that are often not included the legal framework, but which are essential to the development and implementation of a DDR programme. In consultation with the parties and other implementing partners on the ground, the assessment mission should develop a detailed picture of: \n WHO will be disarmed, demobilized and reintegrated; \n WHAT weapons are to be collected, destroyed and disposed of; \n WHERE in the country the identified groups are situated, and where those being dis- armed and demobilized will be resettled or repatriated to; \n WHEN DDR will (or can) take place, and in what sequence for which identified groups, including the priority of action for the different identified groups.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -44598,7 +44598,7 @@ "Heading2": "Assessing the planning and implementation context", "Heading3": "Socio-economic factors", "Heading4": "Defining specific groups for DDR", - "Sentence": "In consultation with the parties and other implementing partners on the ground, the assessment mission should develop a detailed picture of: \\n WHO will be disarmed, demobilized and reintegrated; \\n WHAT weapons are to be collected, destroyed and disposed of; \\n WHERE in the country the identified groups are situated, and where those being dis- armed and demobilized will be resettled or repatriated to; \\n WHEN DDR will (or can) take place, and in what sequence for which identified groups, including the priority of action for the different identified groups.", + "Sentence": "In consultation with the parties and other implementing partners on the ground, the assessment mission should develop a detailed picture of: \n WHO will be disarmed, demobilized and reintegrated; \n WHAT weapons are to be collected, destroyed and disposed of; \n WHERE in the country the identified groups are situated, and where those being dis- armed and demobilized will be resettled or repatriated to; \n WHEN DDR will (or can) take place, and in what sequence for which identified groups, including the priority of action for the different identified groups.", "newParagraph": "character size composition location group specifically identified ddr among required detail often included legal framework essential development implementation ddr programme consultation party implementing partner ground assessment mission develop detailed picture n disarmed demobilized reintegrated n weapon collected destroyed disposed n country identified group situated dis armed demobilized resettled repatriated n ddr take place sequence identified group including priority action different identified group", "ProcessedSent": "consultation party implementing partner ground assessment mission develop detailed picture n disarmed demobilized reintegrated n weapon collected destroyed disposed n country identified group situated dis armed demobilized resettled repatriated n ddr take place sequence identified group including priority action different identified group", "SentID": 2477 @@ -44659,7 +44659,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 804, - "Paragraph": "Potential targets for disarmament include government armed forces, opposition armed groups, civil defence forces, irregular armed groups and armed individuals. These generally include: \\n male and female combatants, and those associated with the fighting groups, such as those performing support roles (voluntarily or because they have been forced to) or who have been abducted; \\n child (boys and girls) soldiers, and those associated with the armed forces and groups; \\n foreign combatants; \\n dependants of combatants.", + "Paragraph": "Potential targets for disarmament include government armed forces, opposition armed groups, civil defence forces, irregular armed groups and armed individuals. These generally include: \n male and female combatants, and those associated with the fighting groups, such as those performing support roles (voluntarily or because they have been forced to) or who have been abducted; \n child (boys and girls) soldiers, and those associated with the armed forces and groups; \n foreign combatants; \n dependants of combatants.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -44677,7 +44677,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 804, - "Paragraph": "Potential targets for disarmament include government armed forces, opposition armed groups, civil defence forces, irregular armed groups and armed individuals. These generally include: \\n male and female combatants, and those associated with the fighting groups, such as those performing support roles (voluntarily or because they have been forced to) or who have been abducted; \\n child (boys and girls) soldiers, and those associated with the armed forces and groups; \\n foreign combatants; \\n dependants of combatants.", + "Paragraph": "Potential targets for disarmament include government armed forces, opposition armed groups, civil defence forces, irregular armed groups and armed individuals. These generally include: \n male and female combatants, and those associated with the fighting groups, such as those performing support roles (voluntarily or because they have been forced to) or who have been abducted; \n child (boys and girls) soldiers, and those associated with the armed forces and groups; \n foreign combatants; \n dependants of combatants.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -44688,7 +44688,7 @@ "Heading2": "Assessing the planning and implementation context", "Heading3": "Socio-economic factors", "Heading4": "Defining specific groups for DDR", - "Sentence": "These generally include: \\n male and female combatants, and those associated with the fighting groups, such as those performing support roles (voluntarily or because they have been forced to) or who have been abducted; \\n child (boys and girls) soldiers, and those associated with the armed forces and groups; \\n foreign combatants; \\n dependants of combatants.", + "Sentence": "These generally include: \n male and female combatants, and those associated with the fighting groups, such as those performing support roles (voluntarily or because they have been forced to) or who have been abducted; \n child (boys and girls) soldiers, and those associated with the armed forces and groups; \n foreign combatants; \n dependants of combatants.", "newParagraph": "potential target disarmament include government armed force opposition armed group civil defence force irregular armed group armed individual generally include n male female combatant associated fighting group performing support role voluntarily forced abducted n child boy girl soldier associated armed force group n foreign combatant n dependant combatant", "ProcessedSent": "generally include n male female combatant associated fighting group performing support role voluntarily forced abducted n child boy girl soldier associated armed force group n foreign combatant n dependant combatant", "SentID": 2482 @@ -44731,7 +44731,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 807, - "Paragraph": "UN funds, agencies and programmes \\n UN agencies can perform certain functions needed for DDR. The resources available to the UN agencies in the country in question should be assessed and reflected in discussions at Headquarters level amongst the agencies concerned. The United Nations Development Programme may already be running a DDR programme in the mission area. This, along with support from other members of the DDR inter-agency forum, will provide the basis for the integrated DDR unit and the expansion of the DDR operation into the peacekeeping mission, if required.", + "Paragraph": "UN funds, agencies and programmes \n UN agencies can perform certain functions needed for DDR. The resources available to the UN agencies in the country in question should be assessed and reflected in discussions at Headquarters level amongst the agencies concerned. The United Nations Development Programme may already be running a DDR programme in the mission area. This, along with support from other members of the DDR inter-agency forum, will provide the basis for the integrated DDR unit and the expansion of the DDR operation into the peacekeeping mission, if required.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -44742,14 +44742,14 @@ "Heading2": "Assessing the planning and implementation context", "Heading3": "Socio-economic factors", "Heading4": "DRR planning and implementation partners", - "Sentence": "UN funds, agencies and programmes \\n UN agencies can perform certain functions needed for DDR.", + "Sentence": "UN funds, agencies and programmes \n UN agencies can perform certain functions needed for DDR.", "newParagraph": "un fund agency programme n un agency perform certain function needed ddr resource available un agency country question assessed reflected discussion headquarters level amongst agency concerned united nation development programme may already running ddr programme mission area along support member ddr interagency forum provide basis integrated ddr unit expansion ddr operation peacekeeping mission required", "ProcessedSent": "un fund agency programme n un agency perform certain function needed ddr", "SentID": 2485 }, { "ParagraphID": 807, - "Paragraph": "UN funds, agencies and programmes \\n UN agencies can perform certain functions needed for DDR. The resources available to the UN agencies in the country in question should be assessed and reflected in discussions at Headquarters level amongst the agencies concerned. The United Nations Development Programme may already be running a DDR programme in the mission area. This, along with support from other members of the DDR inter-agency forum, will provide the basis for the integrated DDR unit and the expansion of the DDR operation into the peacekeeping mission, if required.", + "Paragraph": "UN funds, agencies and programmes \n UN agencies can perform certain functions needed for DDR. The resources available to the UN agencies in the country in question should be assessed and reflected in discussions at Headquarters level amongst the agencies concerned. The United Nations Development Programme may already be running a DDR programme in the mission area. This, along with support from other members of the DDR inter-agency forum, will provide the basis for the integrated DDR unit and the expansion of the DDR operation into the peacekeeping mission, if required.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -44767,7 +44767,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 807, - "Paragraph": "UN funds, agencies and programmes \\n UN agencies can perform certain functions needed for DDR. The resources available to the UN agencies in the country in question should be assessed and reflected in discussions at Headquarters level amongst the agencies concerned. The United Nations Development Programme may already be running a DDR programme in the mission area. This, along with support from other members of the DDR inter-agency forum, will provide the basis for the integrated DDR unit and the expansion of the DDR operation into the peacekeeping mission, if required.", + "Paragraph": "UN funds, agencies and programmes \n UN agencies can perform certain functions needed for DDR. The resources available to the UN agencies in the country in question should be assessed and reflected in discussions at Headquarters level amongst the agencies concerned. The United Nations Development Programme may already be running a DDR programme in the mission area. This, along with support from other members of the DDR inter-agency forum, will provide the basis for the integrated DDR unit and the expansion of the DDR operation into the peacekeeping mission, if required.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -44785,7 +44785,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 807, - "Paragraph": "UN funds, agencies and programmes \\n UN agencies can perform certain functions needed for DDR. The resources available to the UN agencies in the country in question should be assessed and reflected in discussions at Headquarters level amongst the agencies concerned. The United Nations Development Programme may already be running a DDR programme in the mission area. This, along with support from other members of the DDR inter-agency forum, will provide the basis for the integrated DDR unit and the expansion of the DDR operation into the peacekeeping mission, if required.", + "Paragraph": "UN funds, agencies and programmes \n UN agencies can perform certain functions needed for DDR. The resources available to the UN agencies in the country in question should be assessed and reflected in discussions at Headquarters level amongst the agencies concerned. The United Nations Development Programme may already be running a DDR programme in the mission area. This, along with support from other members of the DDR inter-agency forum, will provide the basis for the integrated DDR unit and the expansion of the DDR operation into the peacekeeping mission, if required.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -44803,7 +44803,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 808, - "Paragraph": "International and regional organizations \\n Other international organizations, such as the World Bank, and other regional actors may be involved in DDR before the arrival of the peacekeeping mission. Their role should also be taken into account in the overall planning and implementation of the DDR programme.", + "Paragraph": "International and regional organizations \n Other international organizations, such as the World Bank, and other regional actors may be involved in DDR before the arrival of the peacekeeping mission. Their role should also be taken into account in the overall planning and implementation of the DDR programme.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -44814,14 +44814,14 @@ "Heading2": "Assessing the planning and implementation context", "Heading3": "Socio-economic factors", "Heading4": "DRR planning and implementation partners", - "Sentence": "International and regional organizations \\n Other international organizations, such as the World Bank, and other regional actors may be involved in DDR before the arrival of the peacekeeping mission.", + "Sentence": "International and regional organizations \n Other international organizations, such as the World Bank, and other regional actors may be involved in DDR before the arrival of the peacekeeping mission.", "newParagraph": "international regional organization n international organization world bank regional actor may involved ddr arrival peacekeeping mission role also taken account overall planning implementation ddr programme", "ProcessedSent": "international regional organization n international organization world bank regional actor may involved ddr arrival peacekeeping mission", "SentID": 2489 }, { "ParagraphID": 808, - "Paragraph": "International and regional organizations \\n Other international organizations, such as the World Bank, and other regional actors may be involved in DDR before the arrival of the peacekeeping mission. Their role should also be taken into account in the overall planning and implementation of the DDR programme.", + "Paragraph": "International and regional organizations \n Other international organizations, such as the World Bank, and other regional actors may be involved in DDR before the arrival of the peacekeeping mission. Their role should also be taken into account in the overall planning and implementation of the DDR programme.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -44839,7 +44839,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 809, - "Paragraph": "Non-governmental organizations \\n NGOs are usually the major implementing partners of specific DDR activities as part of the overall programme. The various NGOs contain a wide range of expertise, from child protection and gender issues to small arms, they tend to have a more intimate awareness of local culture and are an integral partner in a DDR programme of a peacekeeping mission. The assessment mission should identify the major NGOs that can work with the UN and the government, and should involve them in the planning process at the earliest opportunity.", + "Paragraph": "Non-governmental organizations \n NGOs are usually the major implementing partners of specific DDR activities as part of the overall programme. The various NGOs contain a wide range of expertise, from child protection and gender issues to small arms, they tend to have a more intimate awareness of local culture and are an integral partner in a DDR programme of a peacekeeping mission. The assessment mission should identify the major NGOs that can work with the UN and the government, and should involve them in the planning process at the earliest opportunity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -44850,14 +44850,14 @@ "Heading2": "Assessing the planning and implementation context", "Heading3": "Socio-economic factors", "Heading4": "DRR planning and implementation partners", - "Sentence": "Non-governmental organizations \\n NGOs are usually the major implementing partners of specific DDR activities as part of the overall programme.", + "Sentence": "Non-governmental organizations \n NGOs are usually the major implementing partners of specific DDR activities as part of the overall programme.", "newParagraph": "nongovernmental organization n ngo usually major implementing partner specific ddr activity part overall programme various ngo contain wide range expertise child protection gender issue small arm tend intimate awareness local culture integral partner ddr programme peacekeeping mission assessment mission identify major ngo work un government involve planning process earliest opportunity", "ProcessedSent": "nongovernmental organization n ngo usually major implementing partner specific ddr activity part overall programme", "SentID": 2491 }, { "ParagraphID": 809, - "Paragraph": "Non-governmental organizations \\n NGOs are usually the major implementing partners of specific DDR activities as part of the overall programme. The various NGOs contain a wide range of expertise, from child protection and gender issues to small arms, they tend to have a more intimate awareness of local culture and are an integral partner in a DDR programme of a peacekeeping mission. The assessment mission should identify the major NGOs that can work with the UN and the government, and should involve them in the planning process at the earliest opportunity.", + "Paragraph": "Non-governmental organizations \n NGOs are usually the major implementing partners of specific DDR activities as part of the overall programme. The various NGOs contain a wide range of expertise, from child protection and gender issues to small arms, they tend to have a more intimate awareness of local culture and are an integral partner in a DDR programme of a peacekeeping mission. The assessment mission should identify the major NGOs that can work with the UN and the government, and should involve them in the planning process at the earliest opportunity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -44875,7 +44875,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 809, - "Paragraph": "Non-governmental organizations \\n NGOs are usually the major implementing partners of specific DDR activities as part of the overall programme. The various NGOs contain a wide range of expertise, from child protection and gender issues to small arms, they tend to have a more intimate awareness of local culture and are an integral partner in a DDR programme of a peacekeeping mission. The assessment mission should identify the major NGOs that can work with the UN and the government, and should involve them in the planning process at the earliest opportunity.", + "Paragraph": "Non-governmental organizations \n NGOs are usually the major implementing partners of specific DDR activities as part of the overall programme. The various NGOs contain a wide range of expertise, from child protection and gender issues to small arms, they tend to have a more intimate awareness of local culture and are an integral partner in a DDR programme of a peacekeeping mission. The assessment mission should identify the major NGOs that can work with the UN and the government, and should involve them in the planning process at the earliest opportunity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -44911,7 +44911,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 811, - "Paragraph": "Finance \\n The amount of money required for the overall DDR programme should be estimated, including what portions are required from the assessed budget and what is to come from voluntary contributions. In the pre-mandate period, the potential of quick-impact projects that can be used to stabilize ex-combatant groups or communities before the formal start of the DDR should be examined. Finance and budgeting processes are detailed in IDDRS 3.41 on Finance and Budgeting.", + "Paragraph": "Finance \n The amount of money required for the overall DDR programme should be estimated, including what portions are required from the assessed budget and what is to come from voluntary contributions. In the pre-mandate period, the potential of quick-impact projects that can be used to stabilize ex-combatant groups or communities before the formal start of the DDR should be examined. Finance and budgeting processes are detailed in IDDRS 3.41 on Finance and Budgeting.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -44922,14 +44922,14 @@ "Heading2": "Assessing the planning and implementation context", "Heading3": "Socio-economic factors", "Heading4": "Support requirements", - "Sentence": "Finance \\n The amount of money required for the overall DDR programme should be estimated, including what portions are required from the assessed budget and what is to come from voluntary contributions.", + "Sentence": "Finance \n The amount of money required for the overall DDR programme should be estimated, including what portions are required from the assessed budget and what is to come from voluntary contributions.", "newParagraph": "finance n amount money required overall ddr programme estimated including portion required assessed budget come voluntary contribution premandate period potential quickimpact project used stabilize excombatant group community formal start ddr examined finance budgeting process detailed iddrs 341 finance budgeting", "ProcessedSent": "finance n amount money required overall ddr programme estimated including portion required assessed budget come voluntary contribution", "SentID": 2495 }, { "ParagraphID": 811, - "Paragraph": "Finance \\n The amount of money required for the overall DDR programme should be estimated, including what portions are required from the assessed budget and what is to come from voluntary contributions. In the pre-mandate period, the potential of quick-impact projects that can be used to stabilize ex-combatant groups or communities before the formal start of the DDR should be examined. Finance and budgeting processes are detailed in IDDRS 3.41 on Finance and Budgeting.", + "Paragraph": "Finance \n The amount of money required for the overall DDR programme should be estimated, including what portions are required from the assessed budget and what is to come from voluntary contributions. In the pre-mandate period, the potential of quick-impact projects that can be used to stabilize ex-combatant groups or communities before the formal start of the DDR should be examined. Finance and budgeting processes are detailed in IDDRS 3.41 on Finance and Budgeting.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -44947,7 +44947,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 811, - "Paragraph": "Finance \\n The amount of money required for the overall DDR programme should be estimated, including what portions are required from the assessed budget and what is to come from voluntary contributions. In the pre-mandate period, the potential of quick-impact projects that can be used to stabilize ex-combatant groups or communities before the formal start of the DDR should be examined. Finance and budgeting processes are detailed in IDDRS 3.41 on Finance and Budgeting.", + "Paragraph": "Finance \n The amount of money required for the overall DDR programme should be estimated, including what portions are required from the assessed budget and what is to come from voluntary contributions. In the pre-mandate period, the potential of quick-impact projects that can be used to stabilize ex-combatant groups or communities before the formal start of the DDR should be examined. Finance and budgeting processes are detailed in IDDRS 3.41 on Finance and Budgeting.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -44965,7 +44965,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 812, - "Paragraph": "Staffing \\n The civilian staff, civilian police and military staff requirements for the planning and imple- mentation of the DDR programme should be estimated, and a deployment sequence for these staff should be drawn up. The integrated DDR unit should contain personnel represent- ing mission components directly related to DDR operations: military; police; logistic support; public information; etc. (integrated DDR personnel and staffing matters are discussed in IDDRS 3.42 on Personnel and Staffing). \\n The material requirements for DDR should also be estimated, in particular weapons storage facilities, destruction machines and disposal equipment, as well as requirements for the demobilization phase of the operation, including transportation (air and land). Mission and programme support logistics matters are discussed in IDDRS 3.40 on Mission and Pro- gramme Support for DDR.", + "Paragraph": "Staffing \n The civilian staff, civilian police and military staff requirements for the planning and imple- mentation of the DDR programme should be estimated, and a deployment sequence for these staff should be drawn up. The integrated DDR unit should contain personnel represent- ing mission components directly related to DDR operations: military; police; logistic support; public information; etc. (integrated DDR personnel and staffing matters are discussed in IDDRS 3.42 on Personnel and Staffing). \n The material requirements for DDR should also be estimated, in particular weapons storage facilities, destruction machines and disposal equipment, as well as requirements for the demobilization phase of the operation, including transportation (air and land). Mission and programme support logistics matters are discussed in IDDRS 3.40 on Mission and Pro- gramme Support for DDR.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -44976,14 +44976,14 @@ "Heading2": "Assessing the planning and implementation context", "Heading3": "Socio-economic factors", "Heading4": "Support requirements", - "Sentence": "Staffing \\n The civilian staff, civilian police and military staff requirements for the planning and imple- mentation of the DDR programme should be estimated, and a deployment sequence for these staff should be drawn up.", + "Sentence": "Staffing \n The civilian staff, civilian police and military staff requirements for the planning and imple- mentation of the DDR programme should be estimated, and a deployment sequence for these staff should be drawn up.", "newParagraph": "staffing n civilian staff civilian police military staff requirement planning imple mentation ddr programme estimated deployment sequence staff drawn integrated ddr unit contain personnel represent ing mission component directly related ddr operation military police logistic support public information etc integrated ddr personnel staffing matter discussed iddrs 342 personnel staffing n material requirement ddr also estimated particular weapon storage facility destruction machine disposal equipment well requirement demobilization phase operation including transportation air land mission programme support logistics matter discussed iddrs 340 mission pro gramme support ddr", "ProcessedSent": "staffing n civilian staff civilian police military staff requirement planning imple mentation ddr programme estimated deployment sequence staff drawn", "SentID": 2498 }, { "ParagraphID": 812, - "Paragraph": "Staffing \\n The civilian staff, civilian police and military staff requirements for the planning and imple- mentation of the DDR programme should be estimated, and a deployment sequence for these staff should be drawn up. The integrated DDR unit should contain personnel represent- ing mission components directly related to DDR operations: military; police; logistic support; public information; etc. (integrated DDR personnel and staffing matters are discussed in IDDRS 3.42 on Personnel and Staffing). \\n The material requirements for DDR should also be estimated, in particular weapons storage facilities, destruction machines and disposal equipment, as well as requirements for the demobilization phase of the operation, including transportation (air and land). Mission and programme support logistics matters are discussed in IDDRS 3.40 on Mission and Pro- gramme Support for DDR.", + "Paragraph": "Staffing \n The civilian staff, civilian police and military staff requirements for the planning and imple- mentation of the DDR programme should be estimated, and a deployment sequence for these staff should be drawn up. The integrated DDR unit should contain personnel represent- ing mission components directly related to DDR operations: military; police; logistic support; public information; etc. (integrated DDR personnel and staffing matters are discussed in IDDRS 3.42 on Personnel and Staffing). \n The material requirements for DDR should also be estimated, in particular weapons storage facilities, destruction machines and disposal equipment, as well as requirements for the demobilization phase of the operation, including transportation (air and land). Mission and programme support logistics matters are discussed in IDDRS 3.40 on Mission and Pro- gramme Support for DDR.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -45001,7 +45001,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 812, - "Paragraph": "Staffing \\n The civilian staff, civilian police and military staff requirements for the planning and imple- mentation of the DDR programme should be estimated, and a deployment sequence for these staff should be drawn up. The integrated DDR unit should contain personnel represent- ing mission components directly related to DDR operations: military; police; logistic support; public information; etc. (integrated DDR personnel and staffing matters are discussed in IDDRS 3.42 on Personnel and Staffing). \\n The material requirements for DDR should also be estimated, in particular weapons storage facilities, destruction machines and disposal equipment, as well as requirements for the demobilization phase of the operation, including transportation (air and land). Mission and programme support logistics matters are discussed in IDDRS 3.40 on Mission and Pro- gramme Support for DDR.", + "Paragraph": "Staffing \n The civilian staff, civilian police and military staff requirements for the planning and imple- mentation of the DDR programme should be estimated, and a deployment sequence for these staff should be drawn up. The integrated DDR unit should contain personnel represent- ing mission components directly related to DDR operations: military; police; logistic support; public information; etc. (integrated DDR personnel and staffing matters are discussed in IDDRS 3.42 on Personnel and Staffing). \n The material requirements for DDR should also be estimated, in particular weapons storage facilities, destruction machines and disposal equipment, as well as requirements for the demobilization phase of the operation, including transportation (air and land). Mission and programme support logistics matters are discussed in IDDRS 3.40 on Mission and Pro- gramme Support for DDR.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -45019,7 +45019,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 812, - "Paragraph": "Staffing \\n The civilian staff, civilian police and military staff requirements for the planning and imple- mentation of the DDR programme should be estimated, and a deployment sequence for these staff should be drawn up. The integrated DDR unit should contain personnel represent- ing mission components directly related to DDR operations: military; police; logistic support; public information; etc. (integrated DDR personnel and staffing matters are discussed in IDDRS 3.42 on Personnel and Staffing). \\n The material requirements for DDR should also be estimated, in particular weapons storage facilities, destruction machines and disposal equipment, as well as requirements for the demobilization phase of the operation, including transportation (air and land). Mission and programme support logistics matters are discussed in IDDRS 3.40 on Mission and Pro- gramme Support for DDR.", + "Paragraph": "Staffing \n The civilian staff, civilian police and military staff requirements for the planning and imple- mentation of the DDR programme should be estimated, and a deployment sequence for these staff should be drawn up. The integrated DDR unit should contain personnel represent- ing mission components directly related to DDR operations: military; police; logistic support; public information; etc. (integrated DDR personnel and staffing matters are discussed in IDDRS 3.42 on Personnel and Staffing). \n The material requirements for DDR should also be estimated, in particular weapons storage facilities, destruction machines and disposal equipment, as well as requirements for the demobilization phase of the operation, including transportation (air and land). Mission and programme support logistics matters are discussed in IDDRS 3.40 on Mission and Pro- gramme Support for DDR.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -45030,14 +45030,14 @@ "Heading2": "Assessing the planning and implementation context", "Heading3": "Socio-economic factors", "Heading4": "Support requirements", - "Sentence": "\\n The material requirements for DDR should also be estimated, in particular weapons storage facilities, destruction machines and disposal equipment, as well as requirements for the demobilization phase of the operation, including transportation (air and land).", + "Sentence": "\n The material requirements for DDR should also be estimated, in particular weapons storage facilities, destruction machines and disposal equipment, as well as requirements for the demobilization phase of the operation, including transportation (air and land).", "newParagraph": "staffing n civilian staff civilian police military staff requirement planning imple mentation ddr programme estimated deployment sequence staff drawn integrated ddr unit contain personnel represent ing mission component directly related ddr operation military police logistic support public information etc integrated ddr personnel staffing matter discussed iddrs 342 personnel staffing n material requirement ddr also estimated particular weapon storage facility destruction machine disposal equipment well requirement demobilization phase operation including transportation air land mission programme support logistics matter discussed iddrs 340 mission pro gramme support ddr", "ProcessedSent": "n material requirement ddr also estimated particular weapon storage facility destruction machine disposal equipment well requirement demobilization phase operation including transportation air land", "SentID": 2501 }, { "ParagraphID": 812, - "Paragraph": "Staffing \\n The civilian staff, civilian police and military staff requirements for the planning and imple- mentation of the DDR programme should be estimated, and a deployment sequence for these staff should be drawn up. The integrated DDR unit should contain personnel represent- ing mission components directly related to DDR operations: military; police; logistic support; public information; etc. (integrated DDR personnel and staffing matters are discussed in IDDRS 3.42 on Personnel and Staffing). \\n The material requirements for DDR should also be estimated, in particular weapons storage facilities, destruction machines and disposal equipment, as well as requirements for the demobilization phase of the operation, including transportation (air and land). Mission and programme support logistics matters are discussed in IDDRS 3.40 on Mission and Pro- gramme Support for DDR.", + "Paragraph": "Staffing \n The civilian staff, civilian police and military staff requirements for the planning and imple- mentation of the DDR programme should be estimated, and a deployment sequence for these staff should be drawn up. The integrated DDR unit should contain personnel represent- ing mission components directly related to DDR operations: military; police; logistic support; public information; etc. (integrated DDR personnel and staffing matters are discussed in IDDRS 3.42 on Personnel and Staffing). \n The material requirements for DDR should also be estimated, in particular weapons storage facilities, destruction machines and disposal equipment, as well as requirements for the demobilization phase of the operation, including transportation (air and land). Mission and programme support logistics matters are discussed in IDDRS 3.40 on Mission and Pro- gramme Support for DDR.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -45055,7 +45055,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 813, - "Paragraph": "The assessment mission report should be submitted in the following format (Section II on the approach of the UN forms the input into the Secretary-General\u2019s report to the Security Council): \\n\\n Preface \\n Maps \\n Introduction \\n Background \\n Summary of the report \\n\\n Section I: Situation \\n Armed forces and groups \\n Political context \\n Socio-economic context \\n Security context \\n Legal context \\n Lessons learned from previous DDR operations in the region, the country and elsewhere (as relevant) \\n Implications and scenarios for DDR programme \\n Key guiding principles for DDR operations \\n Existing DDR programme in country \\n\\n Section II: The UN approach \\n DDR strategy and priorities \\n Support for national processes and institutions \\n Approach to disarmament \\n Approach to demobilization \\n Approach to socio-economic reintegration \\n Approach to children, women and disabled people in the DDR programme \\n Approach to public information \\n Approach to weapons control regimes (internal and external) \\n Approach to funding of the DDR programme \\n Role of the international community \\n\\n Section III: Support requirements \\n Budget \\n Staffing \\n Logistics \\n\\n Suggested annexes \\n Relevant Security Council resolution authorizing the assessment mission \\n Terms of reference of the multidisciplinary assessment mission \\n List of meetings conducted \\n Summary of armed forces and groups \\n Additional information on weapons flows in the region \\n Information on existing disarmament and reintegration activities \\n Lessons learned and evaluations of past disarmament and demobilization programmes \\n Proposed budget, staffing structure and logistic requirements", + "Paragraph": "The assessment mission report should be submitted in the following format (Section II on the approach of the UN forms the input into the Secretary-General\u2019s report to the Security Council): \n\n Preface \n Maps \n Introduction \n Background \n Summary of the report \n\n Section I: Situation \n Armed forces and groups \n Political context \n Socio-economic context \n Security context \n Legal context \n Lessons learned from previous DDR operations in the region, the country and elsewhere (as relevant) \n Implications and scenarios for DDR programme \n Key guiding principles for DDR operations \n Existing DDR programme in country \n\n Section II: The UN approach \n DDR strategy and priorities \n Support for national processes and institutions \n Approach to disarmament \n Approach to demobilization \n Approach to socio-economic reintegration \n Approach to children, women and disabled people in the DDR programme \n Approach to public information \n Approach to weapons control regimes (internal and external) \n Approach to funding of the DDR programme \n Role of the international community \n\n Section III: Support requirements \n Budget \n Staffing \n Logistics \n\n Suggested annexes \n Relevant Security Council resolution authorizing the assessment mission \n Terms of reference of the multidisciplinary assessment mission \n List of meetings conducted \n Summary of armed forces and groups \n Additional information on weapons flows in the region \n Information on existing disarmament and reintegration activities \n Lessons learned and evaluations of past disarmament and demobilization programmes \n Proposed budget, staffing structure and logistic requirements", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -45066,7 +45066,7 @@ "Heading2": "Assessing the planning and implementation context", "Heading3": "Socio-economic factors", "Heading4": "The structure and content of the joint assessment repor", - "Sentence": "The assessment mission report should be submitted in the following format (Section II on the approach of the UN forms the input into the Secretary-General\u2019s report to the Security Council): \\n\\n Preface \\n Maps \\n Introduction \\n Background \\n Summary of the report \\n\\n Section I: Situation \\n Armed forces and groups \\n Political context \\n Socio-economic context \\n Security context \\n Legal context \\n Lessons learned from previous DDR operations in the region, the country and elsewhere (as relevant) \\n Implications and scenarios for DDR programme \\n Key guiding principles for DDR operations \\n Existing DDR programme in country \\n\\n Section II: The UN approach \\n DDR strategy and priorities \\n Support for national processes and institutions \\n Approach to disarmament \\n Approach to demobilization \\n Approach to socio-economic reintegration \\n Approach to children, women and disabled people in the DDR programme \\n Approach to public information \\n Approach to weapons control regimes (internal and external) \\n Approach to funding of the DDR programme \\n Role of the international community \\n\\n Section III: Support requirements \\n Budget \\n Staffing \\n Logistics \\n\\n Suggested annexes \\n Relevant Security Council resolution authorizing the assessment mission \\n Terms of reference of the multidisciplinary assessment mission \\n List of meetings conducted \\n Summary of armed forces and groups \\n Additional information on weapons flows in the region \\n Information on existing disarmament and reintegration activities \\n Lessons learned and evaluations of past disarmament and demobilization programmes \\n Proposed budget, staffing structure and logistic requirements", + "Sentence": "The assessment mission report should be submitted in the following format (Section II on the approach of the UN forms the input into the Secretary-General\u2019s report to the Security Council): \n\n Preface \n Maps \n Introduction \n Background \n Summary of the report \n\n Section I: Situation \n Armed forces and groups \n Political context \n Socio-economic context \n Security context \n Legal context \n Lessons learned from previous DDR operations in the region, the country and elsewhere (as relevant) \n Implications and scenarios for DDR programme \n Key guiding principles for DDR operations \n Existing DDR programme in country \n\n Section II: The UN approach \n DDR strategy and priorities \n Support for national processes and institutions \n Approach to disarmament \n Approach to demobilization \n Approach to socio-economic reintegration \n Approach to children, women and disabled people in the DDR programme \n Approach to public information \n Approach to weapons control regimes (internal and external) \n Approach to funding of the DDR programme \n Role of the international community \n\n Section III: Support requirements \n Budget \n Staffing \n Logistics \n\n Suggested annexes \n Relevant Security Council resolution authorizing the assessment mission \n Terms of reference of the multidisciplinary assessment mission \n List of meetings conducted \n Summary of armed forces and groups \n Additional information on weapons flows in the region \n Information on existing disarmament and reintegration activities \n Lessons learned and evaluations of past disarmament and demobilization programmes \n Proposed budget, staffing structure and logistic requirements", "newParagraph": "assessment mission report submitted following format section ii approach un form input secretarygeneral report security council nn preface n map n introduction n background n summary report nn section situation n armed force group n political context n socioeconomic context n security context n legal context n lesson learned previous ddr operation region country elsewhere relevant n implication scenario ddr programme n key guiding principle ddr operation n existing ddr programme country nn section ii un approach n ddr strategy priority n support national process institution n approach disarmament n approach demobilization n approach socioeconomic reintegration n approach child woman disabled people ddr programme n approach public information n approach weapon control regime internal external n approach funding ddr programme n role international community nn section iii support requirement n budget n staffing n logistics nn suggested annex n relevant security council resolution authorizing assessment mission n term reference multidisciplinary assessment mission n list meeting conducted n summary armed force group n additional information weapon flow region n information existing disarmament reintegration activity n lesson learned evaluation past disarmament demobilization programme n proposed budget staffing structure logistic requirement", "ProcessedSent": "assessment mission report submitted following format section ii approach un form input secretarygeneral report security council nn preface n map n introduction n background n summary report nn section situation n armed force group n political context n socioeconomic context n security context n legal context n lesson learned previous ddr operation region country elsewhere relevant n implication scenario ddr programme n key guiding principle ddr operation n existing ddr programme country nn section ii un approach n ddr strategy priority n support national process institution n approach disarmament n approach demobilization n approach socioeconomic reintegration n approach child woman disabled people ddr programme n approach public information n approach weapon control regime internal external n approach funding ddr programme n role international community nn section iii support requirement n budget n staffing n logistics nn suggested annex n relevant security council resolution authorizing assessment mission n term reference multidisciplinary assessment mission n list meeting conducted n summary armed force group n additional information weapon flow region n information existing disarmament reintegration activity n lesson learned evaluation past disarmament demobilization programme n proposed budget staffing structure logistic requirement", "SentID": 2503 @@ -45091,7 +45091,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 815, - "Paragraph": "A detailed, realistic and achievable DDR implementation annex in the comprehensive peace agreement. \\n Key tasks \\n\\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing technical support to the parties at the peace talks to support the development of: \\n 1. Clear and sound DDR approaches for the different identified groups, with a focus on social and economic reintegration; \\n 2. An equal emphasis on vulnerable identified groups (children, women and disabled people) in or associated with the armed forces and \\n groups; \\n 3. A detailed description of the disposition and deployment of armed forces and groups (local and foreign) to be included in the DDR programme; \\n 4. A realistic time-line for the commencement and duration of the DDR programme; \\n 5. Unified national political, policy and operational mechanisms to support the implementation of the DDR programme; \\n 6. A clear division of labour among parties (government and party x) and other implementing partners (DPKO [civilian, military]; UN agencies, funds and programmes; international financial organizations [World Bank]; and local and international NGOs).", + "Paragraph": "A detailed, realistic and achievable DDR implementation annex in the comprehensive peace agreement. \n Key tasks \n\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing technical support to the parties at the peace talks to support the development of: \n 1. Clear and sound DDR approaches for the different identified groups, with a focus on social and economic reintegration; \n 2. An equal emphasis on vulnerable identified groups (children, women and disabled people) in or associated with the armed forces and \n groups; \n 3. A detailed description of the disposition and deployment of armed forces and groups (local and foreign) to be included in the DDR programme; \n 4. A realistic time-line for the commencement and duration of the DDR programme; \n 5. Unified national political, policy and operational mechanisms to support the implementation of the DDR programme; \n 6. A clear division of labour among parties (government and party x) and other implementing partners (DPKO [civilian, military]; UN agencies, funds and programmes; international financial organizations [World Bank]; and local and international NGOs).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -45109,7 +45109,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 815, - "Paragraph": "A detailed, realistic and achievable DDR implementation annex in the comprehensive peace agreement. \\n Key tasks \\n\\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing technical support to the parties at the peace talks to support the development of: \\n 1. Clear and sound DDR approaches for the different identified groups, with a focus on social and economic reintegration; \\n 2. An equal emphasis on vulnerable identified groups (children, women and disabled people) in or associated with the armed forces and \\n groups; \\n 3. A detailed description of the disposition and deployment of armed forces and groups (local and foreign) to be included in the DDR programme; \\n 4. A realistic time-line for the commencement and duration of the DDR programme; \\n 5. Unified national political, policy and operational mechanisms to support the implementation of the DDR programme; \\n 6. A clear division of labour among parties (government and party x) and other implementing partners (DPKO [civilian, military]; UN agencies, funds and programmes; international financial organizations [World Bank]; and local and international NGOs).", + "Paragraph": "A detailed, realistic and achievable DDR implementation annex in the comprehensive peace agreement. \n Key tasks \n\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing technical support to the parties at the peace talks to support the development of: \n 1. Clear and sound DDR approaches for the different identified groups, with a focus on social and economic reintegration; \n 2. An equal emphasis on vulnerable identified groups (children, women and disabled people) in or associated with the armed forces and \n groups; \n 3. A detailed description of the disposition and deployment of armed forces and groups (local and foreign) to be included in the DDR programme; \n 4. A realistic time-line for the commencement and duration of the DDR programme; \n 5. Unified national political, policy and operational mechanisms to support the implementation of the DDR programme; \n 6. A clear division of labour among parties (government and party x) and other implementing partners (DPKO [civilian, military]; UN agencies, funds and programmes; international financial organizations [World Bank]; and local and international NGOs).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -45120,14 +45120,14 @@ "Heading2": "An example of DDR strategic objectives", "Heading3": "DDR strategic objective #1", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Key tasks \\n\\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing technical support to the parties at the peace talks to support the development of: \\n 1.", + "Sentence": "\n Key tasks \n\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing technical support to the parties at the peace talks to support the development of: \n 1.", "newParagraph": "detailed realistic achievable ddr implementation annex comprehensive peace agreement n key task nn un assist achieving aim providing technical support party peace talk support development n 1 clear sound ddr approach different identified group focus social economic reintegration n 2 equal emphasis vulnerable identified group child woman disabled people associated armed force n group n 3 detailed description disposition deployment armed force group local foreign included ddr programme n 4 realistic timeline commencement duration ddr programme n 5 unified national political policy operational mechanism support implementation ddr programme n 6 clear division labour among party government party x implementing partner dpko civilian military un agency fund programme international financial organization world bank local international ngo", "ProcessedSent": "n key task nn un assist achieving aim providing technical support party peace talk support development n 1", "SentID": 2506 }, { "ParagraphID": 815, - "Paragraph": "A detailed, realistic and achievable DDR implementation annex in the comprehensive peace agreement. \\n Key tasks \\n\\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing technical support to the parties at the peace talks to support the development of: \\n 1. Clear and sound DDR approaches for the different identified groups, with a focus on social and economic reintegration; \\n 2. An equal emphasis on vulnerable identified groups (children, women and disabled people) in or associated with the armed forces and \\n groups; \\n 3. A detailed description of the disposition and deployment of armed forces and groups (local and foreign) to be included in the DDR programme; \\n 4. A realistic time-line for the commencement and duration of the DDR programme; \\n 5. Unified national political, policy and operational mechanisms to support the implementation of the DDR programme; \\n 6. A clear division of labour among parties (government and party x) and other implementing partners (DPKO [civilian, military]; UN agencies, funds and programmes; international financial organizations [World Bank]; and local and international NGOs).", + "Paragraph": "A detailed, realistic and achievable DDR implementation annex in the comprehensive peace agreement. \n Key tasks \n\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing technical support to the parties at the peace talks to support the development of: \n 1. Clear and sound DDR approaches for the different identified groups, with a focus on social and economic reintegration; \n 2. An equal emphasis on vulnerable identified groups (children, women and disabled people) in or associated with the armed forces and \n groups; \n 3. A detailed description of the disposition and deployment of armed forces and groups (local and foreign) to be included in the DDR programme; \n 4. A realistic time-line for the commencement and duration of the DDR programme; \n 5. Unified national political, policy and operational mechanisms to support the implementation of the DDR programme; \n 6. A clear division of labour among parties (government and party x) and other implementing partners (DPKO [civilian, military]; UN agencies, funds and programmes; international financial organizations [World Bank]; and local and international NGOs).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -45138,14 +45138,14 @@ "Heading2": "An example of DDR strategic objectives", "Heading3": "DDR strategic objective #1", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Clear and sound DDR approaches for the different identified groups, with a focus on social and economic reintegration; \\n 2.", + "Sentence": "Clear and sound DDR approaches for the different identified groups, with a focus on social and economic reintegration; \n 2.", "newParagraph": "detailed realistic achievable ddr implementation annex comprehensive peace agreement n key task nn un assist achieving aim providing technical support party peace talk support development n 1 clear sound ddr approach different identified group focus social economic reintegration n 2 equal emphasis vulnerable identified group child woman disabled people associated armed force n group n 3 detailed description disposition deployment armed force group local foreign included ddr programme n 4 realistic timeline commencement duration ddr programme n 5 unified national political policy operational mechanism support implementation ddr programme n 6 clear division labour among party government party x implementing partner dpko civilian military un agency fund programme international financial organization world bank local international ngo", "ProcessedSent": "clear sound ddr approach different identified group focus social economic reintegration n 2", "SentID": 2507 }, { "ParagraphID": 815, - "Paragraph": "A detailed, realistic and achievable DDR implementation annex in the comprehensive peace agreement. \\n Key tasks \\n\\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing technical support to the parties at the peace talks to support the development of: \\n 1. Clear and sound DDR approaches for the different identified groups, with a focus on social and economic reintegration; \\n 2. An equal emphasis on vulnerable identified groups (children, women and disabled people) in or associated with the armed forces and \\n groups; \\n 3. A detailed description of the disposition and deployment of armed forces and groups (local and foreign) to be included in the DDR programme; \\n 4. A realistic time-line for the commencement and duration of the DDR programme; \\n 5. Unified national political, policy and operational mechanisms to support the implementation of the DDR programme; \\n 6. A clear division of labour among parties (government and party x) and other implementing partners (DPKO [civilian, military]; UN agencies, funds and programmes; international financial organizations [World Bank]; and local and international NGOs).", + "Paragraph": "A detailed, realistic and achievable DDR implementation annex in the comprehensive peace agreement. \n Key tasks \n\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing technical support to the parties at the peace talks to support the development of: \n 1. Clear and sound DDR approaches for the different identified groups, with a focus on social and economic reintegration; \n 2. An equal emphasis on vulnerable identified groups (children, women and disabled people) in or associated with the armed forces and \n groups; \n 3. A detailed description of the disposition and deployment of armed forces and groups (local and foreign) to be included in the DDR programme; \n 4. A realistic time-line for the commencement and duration of the DDR programme; \n 5. Unified national political, policy and operational mechanisms to support the implementation of the DDR programme; \n 6. A clear division of labour among parties (government and party x) and other implementing partners (DPKO [civilian, military]; UN agencies, funds and programmes; international financial organizations [World Bank]; and local and international NGOs).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -45156,14 +45156,14 @@ "Heading2": "An example of DDR strategic objectives", "Heading3": "DDR strategic objective #1", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "An equal emphasis on vulnerable identified groups (children, women and disabled people) in or associated with the armed forces and \\n groups; \\n 3.", + "Sentence": "An equal emphasis on vulnerable identified groups (children, women and disabled people) in or associated with the armed forces and \n groups; \n 3.", "newParagraph": "detailed realistic achievable ddr implementation annex comprehensive peace agreement n key task nn un assist achieving aim providing technical support party peace talk support development n 1 clear sound ddr approach different identified group focus social economic reintegration n 2 equal emphasis vulnerable identified group child woman disabled people associated armed force n group n 3 detailed description disposition deployment armed force group local foreign included ddr programme n 4 realistic timeline commencement duration ddr programme n 5 unified national political policy operational mechanism support implementation ddr programme n 6 clear division labour among party government party x implementing partner dpko civilian military un agency fund programme international financial organization world bank local international ngo", "ProcessedSent": "equal emphasis vulnerable identified group child woman disabled people associated armed force n group n 3", "SentID": 2508 }, { "ParagraphID": 815, - "Paragraph": "A detailed, realistic and achievable DDR implementation annex in the comprehensive peace agreement. \\n Key tasks \\n\\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing technical support to the parties at the peace talks to support the development of: \\n 1. Clear and sound DDR approaches for the different identified groups, with a focus on social and economic reintegration; \\n 2. An equal emphasis on vulnerable identified groups (children, women and disabled people) in or associated with the armed forces and \\n groups; \\n 3. A detailed description of the disposition and deployment of armed forces and groups (local and foreign) to be included in the DDR programme; \\n 4. A realistic time-line for the commencement and duration of the DDR programme; \\n 5. Unified national political, policy and operational mechanisms to support the implementation of the DDR programme; \\n 6. A clear division of labour among parties (government and party x) and other implementing partners (DPKO [civilian, military]; UN agencies, funds and programmes; international financial organizations [World Bank]; and local and international NGOs).", + "Paragraph": "A detailed, realistic and achievable DDR implementation annex in the comprehensive peace agreement. \n Key tasks \n\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing technical support to the parties at the peace talks to support the development of: \n 1. Clear and sound DDR approaches for the different identified groups, with a focus on social and economic reintegration; \n 2. An equal emphasis on vulnerable identified groups (children, women and disabled people) in or associated with the armed forces and \n groups; \n 3. A detailed description of the disposition and deployment of armed forces and groups (local and foreign) to be included in the DDR programme; \n 4. A realistic time-line for the commencement and duration of the DDR programme; \n 5. Unified national political, policy and operational mechanisms to support the implementation of the DDR programme; \n 6. A clear division of labour among parties (government and party x) and other implementing partners (DPKO [civilian, military]; UN agencies, funds and programmes; international financial organizations [World Bank]; and local and international NGOs).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -45174,14 +45174,14 @@ "Heading2": "An example of DDR strategic objectives", "Heading3": "DDR strategic objective #1", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "A detailed description of the disposition and deployment of armed forces and groups (local and foreign) to be included in the DDR programme; \\n 4.", + "Sentence": "A detailed description of the disposition and deployment of armed forces and groups (local and foreign) to be included in the DDR programme; \n 4.", "newParagraph": "detailed realistic achievable ddr implementation annex comprehensive peace agreement n key task nn un assist achieving aim providing technical support party peace talk support development n 1 clear sound ddr approach different identified group focus social economic reintegration n 2 equal emphasis vulnerable identified group child woman disabled people associated armed force n group n 3 detailed description disposition deployment armed force group local foreign included ddr programme n 4 realistic timeline commencement duration ddr programme n 5 unified national political policy operational mechanism support implementation ddr programme n 6 clear division labour among party government party x implementing partner dpko civilian military un agency fund programme international financial organization world bank local international ngo", "ProcessedSent": "detailed description disposition deployment armed force group local foreign included ddr programme n 4", "SentID": 2509 }, { "ParagraphID": 815, - "Paragraph": "A detailed, realistic and achievable DDR implementation annex in the comprehensive peace agreement. \\n Key tasks \\n\\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing technical support to the parties at the peace talks to support the development of: \\n 1. Clear and sound DDR approaches for the different identified groups, with a focus on social and economic reintegration; \\n 2. An equal emphasis on vulnerable identified groups (children, women and disabled people) in or associated with the armed forces and \\n groups; \\n 3. A detailed description of the disposition and deployment of armed forces and groups (local and foreign) to be included in the DDR programme; \\n 4. A realistic time-line for the commencement and duration of the DDR programme; \\n 5. Unified national political, policy and operational mechanisms to support the implementation of the DDR programme; \\n 6. A clear division of labour among parties (government and party x) and other implementing partners (DPKO [civilian, military]; UN agencies, funds and programmes; international financial organizations [World Bank]; and local and international NGOs).", + "Paragraph": "A detailed, realistic and achievable DDR implementation annex in the comprehensive peace agreement. \n Key tasks \n\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing technical support to the parties at the peace talks to support the development of: \n 1. Clear and sound DDR approaches for the different identified groups, with a focus on social and economic reintegration; \n 2. An equal emphasis on vulnerable identified groups (children, women and disabled people) in or associated with the armed forces and \n groups; \n 3. A detailed description of the disposition and deployment of armed forces and groups (local and foreign) to be included in the DDR programme; \n 4. A realistic time-line for the commencement and duration of the DDR programme; \n 5. Unified national political, policy and operational mechanisms to support the implementation of the DDR programme; \n 6. A clear division of labour among parties (government and party x) and other implementing partners (DPKO [civilian, military]; UN agencies, funds and programmes; international financial organizations [World Bank]; and local and international NGOs).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -45192,14 +45192,14 @@ "Heading2": "An example of DDR strategic objectives", "Heading3": "DDR strategic objective #1", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "A realistic time-line for the commencement and duration of the DDR programme; \\n 5.", + "Sentence": "A realistic time-line for the commencement and duration of the DDR programme; \n 5.", "newParagraph": "detailed realistic achievable ddr implementation annex comprehensive peace agreement n key task nn un assist achieving aim providing technical support party peace talk support development n 1 clear sound ddr approach different identified group focus social economic reintegration n 2 equal emphasis vulnerable identified group child woman disabled people associated armed force n group n 3 detailed description disposition deployment armed force group local foreign included ddr programme n 4 realistic timeline commencement duration ddr programme n 5 unified national political policy operational mechanism support implementation ddr programme n 6 clear division labour among party government party x implementing partner dpko civilian military un agency fund programme international financial organization world bank local international ngo", "ProcessedSent": "realistic timeline commencement duration ddr programme n 5", "SentID": 2510 }, { "ParagraphID": 815, - "Paragraph": "A detailed, realistic and achievable DDR implementation annex in the comprehensive peace agreement. \\n Key tasks \\n\\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing technical support to the parties at the peace talks to support the development of: \\n 1. Clear and sound DDR approaches for the different identified groups, with a focus on social and economic reintegration; \\n 2. An equal emphasis on vulnerable identified groups (children, women and disabled people) in or associated with the armed forces and \\n groups; \\n 3. A detailed description of the disposition and deployment of armed forces and groups (local and foreign) to be included in the DDR programme; \\n 4. A realistic time-line for the commencement and duration of the DDR programme; \\n 5. Unified national political, policy and operational mechanisms to support the implementation of the DDR programme; \\n 6. A clear division of labour among parties (government and party x) and other implementing partners (DPKO [civilian, military]; UN agencies, funds and programmes; international financial organizations [World Bank]; and local and international NGOs).", + "Paragraph": "A detailed, realistic and achievable DDR implementation annex in the comprehensive peace agreement. \n Key tasks \n\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing technical support to the parties at the peace talks to support the development of: \n 1. Clear and sound DDR approaches for the different identified groups, with a focus on social and economic reintegration; \n 2. An equal emphasis on vulnerable identified groups (children, women and disabled people) in or associated with the armed forces and \n groups; \n 3. A detailed description of the disposition and deployment of armed forces and groups (local and foreign) to be included in the DDR programme; \n 4. A realistic time-line for the commencement and duration of the DDR programme; \n 5. Unified national political, policy and operational mechanisms to support the implementation of the DDR programme; \n 6. A clear division of labour among parties (government and party x) and other implementing partners (DPKO [civilian, military]; UN agencies, funds and programmes; international financial organizations [World Bank]; and local and international NGOs).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -45210,14 +45210,14 @@ "Heading2": "An example of DDR strategic objectives", "Heading3": "DDR strategic objective #1", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Unified national political, policy and operational mechanisms to support the implementation of the DDR programme; \\n 6.", + "Sentence": "Unified national political, policy and operational mechanisms to support the implementation of the DDR programme; \n 6.", "newParagraph": "detailed realistic achievable ddr implementation annex comprehensive peace agreement n key task nn un assist achieving aim providing technical support party peace talk support development n 1 clear sound ddr approach different identified group focus social economic reintegration n 2 equal emphasis vulnerable identified group child woman disabled people associated armed force n group n 3 detailed description disposition deployment armed force group local foreign included ddr programme n 4 realistic timeline commencement duration ddr programme n 5 unified national political policy operational mechanism support implementation ddr programme n 6 clear division labour among party government party x implementing partner dpko civilian military un agency fund programme international financial organization world bank local international ngo", "ProcessedSent": "unified national political policy operational mechanism support implementation ddr programme n 6", "SentID": 2511 }, { "ParagraphID": 815, - "Paragraph": "A detailed, realistic and achievable DDR implementation annex in the comprehensive peace agreement. \\n Key tasks \\n\\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing technical support to the parties at the peace talks to support the development of: \\n 1. Clear and sound DDR approaches for the different identified groups, with a focus on social and economic reintegration; \\n 2. An equal emphasis on vulnerable identified groups (children, women and disabled people) in or associated with the armed forces and \\n groups; \\n 3. A detailed description of the disposition and deployment of armed forces and groups (local and foreign) to be included in the DDR programme; \\n 4. A realistic time-line for the commencement and duration of the DDR programme; \\n 5. Unified national political, policy and operational mechanisms to support the implementation of the DDR programme; \\n 6. A clear division of labour among parties (government and party x) and other implementing partners (DPKO [civilian, military]; UN agencies, funds and programmes; international financial organizations [World Bank]; and local and international NGOs).", + "Paragraph": "A detailed, realistic and achievable DDR implementation annex in the comprehensive peace agreement. \n Key tasks \n\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing technical support to the parties at the peace talks to support the development of: \n 1. Clear and sound DDR approaches for the different identified groups, with a focus on social and economic reintegration; \n 2. An equal emphasis on vulnerable identified groups (children, women and disabled people) in or associated with the armed forces and \n groups; \n 3. A detailed description of the disposition and deployment of armed forces and groups (local and foreign) to be included in the DDR programme; \n 4. A realistic time-line for the commencement and duration of the DDR programme; \n 5. Unified national political, policy and operational mechanisms to support the implementation of the DDR programme; \n 6. A clear division of labour among parties (government and party x) and other implementing partners (DPKO [civilian, military]; UN agencies, funds and programmes; international financial organizations [World Bank]; and local and international NGOs).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -45235,7 +45235,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 816, - "Paragraph": "A well-resourced, joint strategic and operational plan for the implementation of DDR in country x. \\n Key tasks \\n\\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing planning capacities and physical resources to: \\n 1. Establish all-inclusive joint planning mechanisms; \\n 2. Develop a time-phased concept of the DDR operations; \\n 3. Establish division of labour for key DDR tasks; \\n 4. Estimate the broad resource requirements; \\n 5. Start securing voluntary contributions; \\n 6. Start the procurement of DDR items with long lead times; \\n 7. Start the phased recruitment of personnel required from DPKO and other UN agencies; \\n 8. Raise a military component from the armed forces of Member States for DDR activities; \\n 9. Establish an effective public information campaign; \\n 10. Establish programmatic links between the DDR operation and other areas of the mission\u2019s work: security sector reform; recovery and reconstruction; etc.; \\n 11. Support the implementation of the established DDR strategy\/plan.", + "Paragraph": "A well-resourced, joint strategic and operational plan for the implementation of DDR in country x. \n Key tasks \n\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing planning capacities and physical resources to: \n 1. Establish all-inclusive joint planning mechanisms; \n 2. Develop a time-phased concept of the DDR operations; \n 3. Establish division of labour for key DDR tasks; \n 4. Estimate the broad resource requirements; \n 5. Start securing voluntary contributions; \n 6. Start the procurement of DDR items with long lead times; \n 7. Start the phased recruitment of personnel required from DPKO and other UN agencies; \n 8. Raise a military component from the armed forces of Member States for DDR activities; \n 9. Establish an effective public information campaign; \n 10. Establish programmatic links between the DDR operation and other areas of the mission\u2019s work: security sector reform; recovery and reconstruction; etc.; \n 11. Support the implementation of the established DDR strategy\/plan.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -45253,7 +45253,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 816, - "Paragraph": "A well-resourced, joint strategic and operational plan for the implementation of DDR in country x. \\n Key tasks \\n\\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing planning capacities and physical resources to: \\n 1. Establish all-inclusive joint planning mechanisms; \\n 2. Develop a time-phased concept of the DDR operations; \\n 3. Establish division of labour for key DDR tasks; \\n 4. Estimate the broad resource requirements; \\n 5. Start securing voluntary contributions; \\n 6. Start the procurement of DDR items with long lead times; \\n 7. Start the phased recruitment of personnel required from DPKO and other UN agencies; \\n 8. Raise a military component from the armed forces of Member States for DDR activities; \\n 9. Establish an effective public information campaign; \\n 10. Establish programmatic links between the DDR operation and other areas of the mission\u2019s work: security sector reform; recovery and reconstruction; etc.; \\n 11. Support the implementation of the established DDR strategy\/plan.", + "Paragraph": "A well-resourced, joint strategic and operational plan for the implementation of DDR in country x. \n Key tasks \n\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing planning capacities and physical resources to: \n 1. Establish all-inclusive joint planning mechanisms; \n 2. Develop a time-phased concept of the DDR operations; \n 3. Establish division of labour for key DDR tasks; \n 4. Estimate the broad resource requirements; \n 5. Start securing voluntary contributions; \n 6. Start the procurement of DDR items with long lead times; \n 7. Start the phased recruitment of personnel required from DPKO and other UN agencies; \n 8. Raise a military component from the armed forces of Member States for DDR activities; \n 9. Establish an effective public information campaign; \n 10. Establish programmatic links between the DDR operation and other areas of the mission\u2019s work: security sector reform; recovery and reconstruction; etc.; \n 11. Support the implementation of the established DDR strategy\/plan.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -45264,14 +45264,14 @@ "Heading2": "An example of DDR strategic objectives", "Heading3": "DDR strategic objective #2", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Key tasks \\n\\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing planning capacities and physical resources to: \\n 1.", + "Sentence": "\n Key tasks \n\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing planning capacities and physical resources to: \n 1.", "newParagraph": "wellresourced joint strategic operational plan implementation ddr country x n key task nn un assist achieving aim providing planning capacity physical resource n 1 establish allinclusive joint planning mechanism n 2 develop timephased concept ddr operation n 3 establish division labour key ddr task n 4 estimate broad resource requirement n 5 start securing voluntary contribution n 6 start procurement ddr item long lead time n 7 start phased recruitment personnel required dpko un agency n 8 raise military component armed force member state ddr activity n 9 establish effective public information campaign n 10 establish programmatic link ddr operation area mission work security sector reform recovery reconstruction etc n 11 support implementation established ddr strategyplan", "ProcessedSent": "n key task nn un assist achieving aim providing planning capacity physical resource n 1", "SentID": 2514 }, { "ParagraphID": 816, - "Paragraph": "A well-resourced, joint strategic and operational plan for the implementation of DDR in country x. \\n Key tasks \\n\\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing planning capacities and physical resources to: \\n 1. Establish all-inclusive joint planning mechanisms; \\n 2. Develop a time-phased concept of the DDR operations; \\n 3. Establish division of labour for key DDR tasks; \\n 4. Estimate the broad resource requirements; \\n 5. Start securing voluntary contributions; \\n 6. Start the procurement of DDR items with long lead times; \\n 7. Start the phased recruitment of personnel required from DPKO and other UN agencies; \\n 8. Raise a military component from the armed forces of Member States for DDR activities; \\n 9. Establish an effective public information campaign; \\n 10. Establish programmatic links between the DDR operation and other areas of the mission\u2019s work: security sector reform; recovery and reconstruction; etc.; \\n 11. Support the implementation of the established DDR strategy\/plan.", + "Paragraph": "A well-resourced, joint strategic and operational plan for the implementation of DDR in country x. \n Key tasks \n\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing planning capacities and physical resources to: \n 1. Establish all-inclusive joint planning mechanisms; \n 2. Develop a time-phased concept of the DDR operations; \n 3. Establish division of labour for key DDR tasks; \n 4. Estimate the broad resource requirements; \n 5. Start securing voluntary contributions; \n 6. Start the procurement of DDR items with long lead times; \n 7. Start the phased recruitment of personnel required from DPKO and other UN agencies; \n 8. Raise a military component from the armed forces of Member States for DDR activities; \n 9. Establish an effective public information campaign; \n 10. Establish programmatic links between the DDR operation and other areas of the mission\u2019s work: security sector reform; recovery and reconstruction; etc.; \n 11. Support the implementation of the established DDR strategy\/plan.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -45282,14 +45282,14 @@ "Heading2": "An example of DDR strategic objectives", "Heading3": "DDR strategic objective #2", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Establish all-inclusive joint planning mechanisms; \\n 2.", + "Sentence": "Establish all-inclusive joint planning mechanisms; \n 2.", "newParagraph": "wellresourced joint strategic operational plan implementation ddr country x n key task nn un assist achieving aim providing planning capacity physical resource n 1 establish allinclusive joint planning mechanism n 2 develop timephased concept ddr operation n 3 establish division labour key ddr task n 4 estimate broad resource requirement n 5 start securing voluntary contribution n 6 start procurement ddr item long lead time n 7 start phased recruitment personnel required dpko un agency n 8 raise military component armed force member state ddr activity n 9 establish effective public information campaign n 10 establish programmatic link ddr operation area mission work security sector reform recovery reconstruction etc n 11 support implementation established ddr strategyplan", "ProcessedSent": "establish allinclusive joint planning mechanism n 2", "SentID": 2515 }, { "ParagraphID": 816, - "Paragraph": "A well-resourced, joint strategic and operational plan for the implementation of DDR in country x. \\n Key tasks \\n\\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing planning capacities and physical resources to: \\n 1. Establish all-inclusive joint planning mechanisms; \\n 2. Develop a time-phased concept of the DDR operations; \\n 3. Establish division of labour for key DDR tasks; \\n 4. Estimate the broad resource requirements; \\n 5. Start securing voluntary contributions; \\n 6. Start the procurement of DDR items with long lead times; \\n 7. Start the phased recruitment of personnel required from DPKO and other UN agencies; \\n 8. Raise a military component from the armed forces of Member States for DDR activities; \\n 9. Establish an effective public information campaign; \\n 10. Establish programmatic links between the DDR operation and other areas of the mission\u2019s work: security sector reform; recovery and reconstruction; etc.; \\n 11. Support the implementation of the established DDR strategy\/plan.", + "Paragraph": "A well-resourced, joint strategic and operational plan for the implementation of DDR in country x. \n Key tasks \n\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing planning capacities and physical resources to: \n 1. Establish all-inclusive joint planning mechanisms; \n 2. Develop a time-phased concept of the DDR operations; \n 3. Establish division of labour for key DDR tasks; \n 4. Estimate the broad resource requirements; \n 5. Start securing voluntary contributions; \n 6. Start the procurement of DDR items with long lead times; \n 7. Start the phased recruitment of personnel required from DPKO and other UN agencies; \n 8. Raise a military component from the armed forces of Member States for DDR activities; \n 9. Establish an effective public information campaign; \n 10. Establish programmatic links between the DDR operation and other areas of the mission\u2019s work: security sector reform; recovery and reconstruction; etc.; \n 11. Support the implementation of the established DDR strategy\/plan.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -45300,14 +45300,14 @@ "Heading2": "An example of DDR strategic objectives", "Heading3": "DDR strategic objective #2", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Develop a time-phased concept of the DDR operations; \\n 3.", + "Sentence": "Develop a time-phased concept of the DDR operations; \n 3.", "newParagraph": "wellresourced joint strategic operational plan implementation ddr country x n key task nn un assist achieving aim providing planning capacity physical resource n 1 establish allinclusive joint planning mechanism n 2 develop timephased concept ddr operation n 3 establish division labour key ddr task n 4 estimate broad resource requirement n 5 start securing voluntary contribution n 6 start procurement ddr item long lead time n 7 start phased recruitment personnel required dpko un agency n 8 raise military component armed force member state ddr activity n 9 establish effective public information campaign n 10 establish programmatic link ddr operation area mission work security sector reform recovery reconstruction etc n 11 support implementation established ddr strategyplan", "ProcessedSent": "develop timephased concept ddr operation n 3", "SentID": 2516 }, { "ParagraphID": 816, - "Paragraph": "A well-resourced, joint strategic and operational plan for the implementation of DDR in country x. \\n Key tasks \\n\\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing planning capacities and physical resources to: \\n 1. Establish all-inclusive joint planning mechanisms; \\n 2. Develop a time-phased concept of the DDR operations; \\n 3. Establish division of labour for key DDR tasks; \\n 4. Estimate the broad resource requirements; \\n 5. Start securing voluntary contributions; \\n 6. Start the procurement of DDR items with long lead times; \\n 7. Start the phased recruitment of personnel required from DPKO and other UN agencies; \\n 8. Raise a military component from the armed forces of Member States for DDR activities; \\n 9. Establish an effective public information campaign; \\n 10. Establish programmatic links between the DDR operation and other areas of the mission\u2019s work: security sector reform; recovery and reconstruction; etc.; \\n 11. Support the implementation of the established DDR strategy\/plan.", + "Paragraph": "A well-resourced, joint strategic and operational plan for the implementation of DDR in country x. \n Key tasks \n\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing planning capacities and physical resources to: \n 1. Establish all-inclusive joint planning mechanisms; \n 2. Develop a time-phased concept of the DDR operations; \n 3. Establish division of labour for key DDR tasks; \n 4. Estimate the broad resource requirements; \n 5. Start securing voluntary contributions; \n 6. Start the procurement of DDR items with long lead times; \n 7. Start the phased recruitment of personnel required from DPKO and other UN agencies; \n 8. Raise a military component from the armed forces of Member States for DDR activities; \n 9. Establish an effective public information campaign; \n 10. Establish programmatic links between the DDR operation and other areas of the mission\u2019s work: security sector reform; recovery and reconstruction; etc.; \n 11. Support the implementation of the established DDR strategy\/plan.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -45318,14 +45318,14 @@ "Heading2": "An example of DDR strategic objectives", "Heading3": "DDR strategic objective #2", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Establish division of labour for key DDR tasks; \\n 4.", + "Sentence": "Establish division of labour for key DDR tasks; \n 4.", "newParagraph": "wellresourced joint strategic operational plan implementation ddr country x n key task nn un assist achieving aim providing planning capacity physical resource n 1 establish allinclusive joint planning mechanism n 2 develop timephased concept ddr operation n 3 establish division labour key ddr task n 4 estimate broad resource requirement n 5 start securing voluntary contribution n 6 start procurement ddr item long lead time n 7 start phased recruitment personnel required dpko un agency n 8 raise military component armed force member state ddr activity n 9 establish effective public information campaign n 10 establish programmatic link ddr operation area mission work security sector reform recovery reconstruction etc n 11 support implementation established ddr strategyplan", "ProcessedSent": "establish division labour key ddr task n 4", "SentID": 2517 }, { "ParagraphID": 816, - "Paragraph": "A well-resourced, joint strategic and operational plan for the implementation of DDR in country x. \\n Key tasks \\n\\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing planning capacities and physical resources to: \\n 1. Establish all-inclusive joint planning mechanisms; \\n 2. Develop a time-phased concept of the DDR operations; \\n 3. Establish division of labour for key DDR tasks; \\n 4. Estimate the broad resource requirements; \\n 5. Start securing voluntary contributions; \\n 6. Start the procurement of DDR items with long lead times; \\n 7. Start the phased recruitment of personnel required from DPKO and other UN agencies; \\n 8. Raise a military component from the armed forces of Member States for DDR activities; \\n 9. Establish an effective public information campaign; \\n 10. Establish programmatic links between the DDR operation and other areas of the mission\u2019s work: security sector reform; recovery and reconstruction; etc.; \\n 11. Support the implementation of the established DDR strategy\/plan.", + "Paragraph": "A well-resourced, joint strategic and operational plan for the implementation of DDR in country x. \n Key tasks \n\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing planning capacities and physical resources to: \n 1. Establish all-inclusive joint planning mechanisms; \n 2. Develop a time-phased concept of the DDR operations; \n 3. Establish division of labour for key DDR tasks; \n 4. Estimate the broad resource requirements; \n 5. Start securing voluntary contributions; \n 6. Start the procurement of DDR items with long lead times; \n 7. Start the phased recruitment of personnel required from DPKO and other UN agencies; \n 8. Raise a military component from the armed forces of Member States for DDR activities; \n 9. Establish an effective public information campaign; \n 10. Establish programmatic links between the DDR operation and other areas of the mission\u2019s work: security sector reform; recovery and reconstruction; etc.; \n 11. Support the implementation of the established DDR strategy\/plan.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -45336,14 +45336,14 @@ "Heading2": "An example of DDR strategic objectives", "Heading3": "DDR strategic objective #2", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Estimate the broad resource requirements; \\n 5.", + "Sentence": "Estimate the broad resource requirements; \n 5.", "newParagraph": "wellresourced joint strategic operational plan implementation ddr country x n key task nn un assist achieving aim providing planning capacity physical resource n 1 establish allinclusive joint planning mechanism n 2 develop timephased concept ddr operation n 3 establish division labour key ddr task n 4 estimate broad resource requirement n 5 start securing voluntary contribution n 6 start procurement ddr item long lead time n 7 start phased recruitment personnel required dpko un agency n 8 raise military component armed force member state ddr activity n 9 establish effective public information campaign n 10 establish programmatic link ddr operation area mission work security sector reform recovery reconstruction etc n 11 support implementation established ddr strategyplan", "ProcessedSent": "estimate broad resource requirement n 5", "SentID": 2518 }, { "ParagraphID": 816, - "Paragraph": "A well-resourced, joint strategic and operational plan for the implementation of DDR in country x. \\n Key tasks \\n\\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing planning capacities and physical resources to: \\n 1. Establish all-inclusive joint planning mechanisms; \\n 2. Develop a time-phased concept of the DDR operations; \\n 3. Establish division of labour for key DDR tasks; \\n 4. Estimate the broad resource requirements; \\n 5. Start securing voluntary contributions; \\n 6. Start the procurement of DDR items with long lead times; \\n 7. Start the phased recruitment of personnel required from DPKO and other UN agencies; \\n 8. Raise a military component from the armed forces of Member States for DDR activities; \\n 9. Establish an effective public information campaign; \\n 10. Establish programmatic links between the DDR operation and other areas of the mission\u2019s work: security sector reform; recovery and reconstruction; etc.; \\n 11. Support the implementation of the established DDR strategy\/plan.", + "Paragraph": "A well-resourced, joint strategic and operational plan for the implementation of DDR in country x. \n Key tasks \n\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing planning capacities and physical resources to: \n 1. Establish all-inclusive joint planning mechanisms; \n 2. Develop a time-phased concept of the DDR operations; \n 3. Establish division of labour for key DDR tasks; \n 4. Estimate the broad resource requirements; \n 5. Start securing voluntary contributions; \n 6. Start the procurement of DDR items with long lead times; \n 7. Start the phased recruitment of personnel required from DPKO and other UN agencies; \n 8. Raise a military component from the armed forces of Member States for DDR activities; \n 9. Establish an effective public information campaign; \n 10. Establish programmatic links between the DDR operation and other areas of the mission\u2019s work: security sector reform; recovery and reconstruction; etc.; \n 11. Support the implementation of the established DDR strategy\/plan.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -45354,14 +45354,14 @@ "Heading2": "An example of DDR strategic objectives", "Heading3": "DDR strategic objective #2", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Start securing voluntary contributions; \\n 6.", + "Sentence": "Start securing voluntary contributions; \n 6.", "newParagraph": "wellresourced joint strategic operational plan implementation ddr country x n key task nn un assist achieving aim providing planning capacity physical resource n 1 establish allinclusive joint planning mechanism n 2 develop timephased concept ddr operation n 3 establish division labour key ddr task n 4 estimate broad resource requirement n 5 start securing voluntary contribution n 6 start procurement ddr item long lead time n 7 start phased recruitment personnel required dpko un agency n 8 raise military component armed force member state ddr activity n 9 establish effective public information campaign n 10 establish programmatic link ddr operation area mission work security sector reform recovery reconstruction etc n 11 support implementation established ddr strategyplan", "ProcessedSent": "start securing voluntary contribution n 6", "SentID": 2519 }, { "ParagraphID": 816, - "Paragraph": "A well-resourced, joint strategic and operational plan for the implementation of DDR in country x. \\n Key tasks \\n\\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing planning capacities and physical resources to: \\n 1. Establish all-inclusive joint planning mechanisms; \\n 2. Develop a time-phased concept of the DDR operations; \\n 3. Establish division of labour for key DDR tasks; \\n 4. Estimate the broad resource requirements; \\n 5. Start securing voluntary contributions; \\n 6. Start the procurement of DDR items with long lead times; \\n 7. Start the phased recruitment of personnel required from DPKO and other UN agencies; \\n 8. Raise a military component from the armed forces of Member States for DDR activities; \\n 9. Establish an effective public information campaign; \\n 10. Establish programmatic links between the DDR operation and other areas of the mission\u2019s work: security sector reform; recovery and reconstruction; etc.; \\n 11. Support the implementation of the established DDR strategy\/plan.", + "Paragraph": "A well-resourced, joint strategic and operational plan for the implementation of DDR in country x. \n Key tasks \n\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing planning capacities and physical resources to: \n 1. Establish all-inclusive joint planning mechanisms; \n 2. Develop a time-phased concept of the DDR operations; \n 3. Establish division of labour for key DDR tasks; \n 4. Estimate the broad resource requirements; \n 5. Start securing voluntary contributions; \n 6. Start the procurement of DDR items with long lead times; \n 7. Start the phased recruitment of personnel required from DPKO and other UN agencies; \n 8. Raise a military component from the armed forces of Member States for DDR activities; \n 9. Establish an effective public information campaign; \n 10. Establish programmatic links between the DDR operation and other areas of the mission\u2019s work: security sector reform; recovery and reconstruction; etc.; \n 11. Support the implementation of the established DDR strategy\/plan.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -45372,14 +45372,14 @@ "Heading2": "An example of DDR strategic objectives", "Heading3": "DDR strategic objective #2", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Start the procurement of DDR items with long lead times; \\n 7.", + "Sentence": "Start the procurement of DDR items with long lead times; \n 7.", "newParagraph": "wellresourced joint strategic operational plan implementation ddr country x n key task nn un assist achieving aim providing planning capacity physical resource n 1 establish allinclusive joint planning mechanism n 2 develop timephased concept ddr operation n 3 establish division labour key ddr task n 4 estimate broad resource requirement n 5 start securing voluntary contribution n 6 start procurement ddr item long lead time n 7 start phased recruitment personnel required dpko un agency n 8 raise military component armed force member state ddr activity n 9 establish effective public information campaign n 10 establish programmatic link ddr operation area mission work security sector reform recovery reconstruction etc n 11 support implementation established ddr strategyplan", "ProcessedSent": "start procurement ddr item long lead time n 7", "SentID": 2520 }, { "ParagraphID": 816, - "Paragraph": "A well-resourced, joint strategic and operational plan for the implementation of DDR in country x. \\n Key tasks \\n\\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing planning capacities and physical resources to: \\n 1. Establish all-inclusive joint planning mechanisms; \\n 2. Develop a time-phased concept of the DDR operations; \\n 3. Establish division of labour for key DDR tasks; \\n 4. Estimate the broad resource requirements; \\n 5. Start securing voluntary contributions; \\n 6. Start the procurement of DDR items with long lead times; \\n 7. Start the phased recruitment of personnel required from DPKO and other UN agencies; \\n 8. Raise a military component from the armed forces of Member States for DDR activities; \\n 9. Establish an effective public information campaign; \\n 10. Establish programmatic links between the DDR operation and other areas of the mission\u2019s work: security sector reform; recovery and reconstruction; etc.; \\n 11. Support the implementation of the established DDR strategy\/plan.", + "Paragraph": "A well-resourced, joint strategic and operational plan for the implementation of DDR in country x. \n Key tasks \n\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing planning capacities and physical resources to: \n 1. Establish all-inclusive joint planning mechanisms; \n 2. Develop a time-phased concept of the DDR operations; \n 3. Establish division of labour for key DDR tasks; \n 4. Estimate the broad resource requirements; \n 5. Start securing voluntary contributions; \n 6. Start the procurement of DDR items with long lead times; \n 7. Start the phased recruitment of personnel required from DPKO and other UN agencies; \n 8. Raise a military component from the armed forces of Member States for DDR activities; \n 9. Establish an effective public information campaign; \n 10. Establish programmatic links between the DDR operation and other areas of the mission\u2019s work: security sector reform; recovery and reconstruction; etc.; \n 11. Support the implementation of the established DDR strategy\/plan.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -45390,14 +45390,14 @@ "Heading2": "An example of DDR strategic objectives", "Heading3": "DDR strategic objective #2", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Start the phased recruitment of personnel required from DPKO and other UN agencies; \\n 8.", + "Sentence": "Start the phased recruitment of personnel required from DPKO and other UN agencies; \n 8.", "newParagraph": "wellresourced joint strategic operational plan implementation ddr country x n key task nn un assist achieving aim providing planning capacity physical resource n 1 establish allinclusive joint planning mechanism n 2 develop timephased concept ddr operation n 3 establish division labour key ddr task n 4 estimate broad resource requirement n 5 start securing voluntary contribution n 6 start procurement ddr item long lead time n 7 start phased recruitment personnel required dpko un agency n 8 raise military component armed force member state ddr activity n 9 establish effective public information campaign n 10 establish programmatic link ddr operation area mission work security sector reform recovery reconstruction etc n 11 support implementation established ddr strategyplan", "ProcessedSent": "start phased recruitment personnel required dpko un agency n 8", "SentID": 2521 }, { "ParagraphID": 816, - "Paragraph": "A well-resourced, joint strategic and operational plan for the implementation of DDR in country x. \\n Key tasks \\n\\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing planning capacities and physical resources to: \\n 1. Establish all-inclusive joint planning mechanisms; \\n 2. Develop a time-phased concept of the DDR operations; \\n 3. Establish division of labour for key DDR tasks; \\n 4. Estimate the broad resource requirements; \\n 5. Start securing voluntary contributions; \\n 6. Start the procurement of DDR items with long lead times; \\n 7. Start the phased recruitment of personnel required from DPKO and other UN agencies; \\n 8. Raise a military component from the armed forces of Member States for DDR activities; \\n 9. Establish an effective public information campaign; \\n 10. Establish programmatic links between the DDR operation and other areas of the mission\u2019s work: security sector reform; recovery and reconstruction; etc.; \\n 11. Support the implementation of the established DDR strategy\/plan.", + "Paragraph": "A well-resourced, joint strategic and operational plan for the implementation of DDR in country x. \n Key tasks \n\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing planning capacities and physical resources to: \n 1. Establish all-inclusive joint planning mechanisms; \n 2. Develop a time-phased concept of the DDR operations; \n 3. Establish division of labour for key DDR tasks; \n 4. Estimate the broad resource requirements; \n 5. Start securing voluntary contributions; \n 6. Start the procurement of DDR items with long lead times; \n 7. Start the phased recruitment of personnel required from DPKO and other UN agencies; \n 8. Raise a military component from the armed forces of Member States for DDR activities; \n 9. Establish an effective public information campaign; \n 10. Establish programmatic links between the DDR operation and other areas of the mission\u2019s work: security sector reform; recovery and reconstruction; etc.; \n 11. Support the implementation of the established DDR strategy\/plan.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -45408,14 +45408,14 @@ "Heading2": "An example of DDR strategic objectives", "Heading3": "DDR strategic objective #2", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Raise a military component from the armed forces of Member States for DDR activities; \\n 9.", + "Sentence": "Raise a military component from the armed forces of Member States for DDR activities; \n 9.", "newParagraph": "wellresourced joint strategic operational plan implementation ddr country x n key task nn un assist achieving aim providing planning capacity physical resource n 1 establish allinclusive joint planning mechanism n 2 develop timephased concept ddr operation n 3 establish division labour key ddr task n 4 estimate broad resource requirement n 5 start securing voluntary contribution n 6 start procurement ddr item long lead time n 7 start phased recruitment personnel required dpko un agency n 8 raise military component armed force member state ddr activity n 9 establish effective public information campaign n 10 establish programmatic link ddr operation area mission work security sector reform recovery reconstruction etc n 11 support implementation established ddr strategyplan", "ProcessedSent": "raise military component armed force member state ddr activity n 9", "SentID": 2522 }, { "ParagraphID": 816, - "Paragraph": "A well-resourced, joint strategic and operational plan for the implementation of DDR in country x. \\n Key tasks \\n\\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing planning capacities and physical resources to: \\n 1. Establish all-inclusive joint planning mechanisms; \\n 2. Develop a time-phased concept of the DDR operations; \\n 3. Establish division of labour for key DDR tasks; \\n 4. Estimate the broad resource requirements; \\n 5. Start securing voluntary contributions; \\n 6. Start the procurement of DDR items with long lead times; \\n 7. Start the phased recruitment of personnel required from DPKO and other UN agencies; \\n 8. Raise a military component from the armed forces of Member States for DDR activities; \\n 9. Establish an effective public information campaign; \\n 10. Establish programmatic links between the DDR operation and other areas of the mission\u2019s work: security sector reform; recovery and reconstruction; etc.; \\n 11. Support the implementation of the established DDR strategy\/plan.", + "Paragraph": "A well-resourced, joint strategic and operational plan for the implementation of DDR in country x. \n Key tasks \n\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing planning capacities and physical resources to: \n 1. Establish all-inclusive joint planning mechanisms; \n 2. Develop a time-phased concept of the DDR operations; \n 3. Establish division of labour for key DDR tasks; \n 4. Estimate the broad resource requirements; \n 5. Start securing voluntary contributions; \n 6. Start the procurement of DDR items with long lead times; \n 7. Start the phased recruitment of personnel required from DPKO and other UN agencies; \n 8. Raise a military component from the armed forces of Member States for DDR activities; \n 9. Establish an effective public information campaign; \n 10. Establish programmatic links between the DDR operation and other areas of the mission\u2019s work: security sector reform; recovery and reconstruction; etc.; \n 11. Support the implementation of the established DDR strategy\/plan.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -45426,14 +45426,14 @@ "Heading2": "An example of DDR strategic objectives", "Heading3": "DDR strategic objective #2", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Establish an effective public information campaign; \\n 10.", + "Sentence": "Establish an effective public information campaign; \n 10.", "newParagraph": "wellresourced joint strategic operational plan implementation ddr country x n key task nn un assist achieving aim providing planning capacity physical resource n 1 establish allinclusive joint planning mechanism n 2 develop timephased concept ddr operation n 3 establish division labour key ddr task n 4 estimate broad resource requirement n 5 start securing voluntary contribution n 6 start procurement ddr item long lead time n 7 start phased recruitment personnel required dpko un agency n 8 raise military component armed force member state ddr activity n 9 establish effective public information campaign n 10 establish programmatic link ddr operation area mission work security sector reform recovery reconstruction etc n 11 support implementation established ddr strategyplan", "ProcessedSent": "establish effective public information campaign n 10", "SentID": 2523 }, { "ParagraphID": 816, - "Paragraph": "A well-resourced, joint strategic and operational plan for the implementation of DDR in country x. \\n Key tasks \\n\\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing planning capacities and physical resources to: \\n 1. Establish all-inclusive joint planning mechanisms; \\n 2. Develop a time-phased concept of the DDR operations; \\n 3. Establish division of labour for key DDR tasks; \\n 4. Estimate the broad resource requirements; \\n 5. Start securing voluntary contributions; \\n 6. Start the procurement of DDR items with long lead times; \\n 7. Start the phased recruitment of personnel required from DPKO and other UN agencies; \\n 8. Raise a military component from the armed forces of Member States for DDR activities; \\n 9. Establish an effective public information campaign; \\n 10. Establish programmatic links between the DDR operation and other areas of the mission\u2019s work: security sector reform; recovery and reconstruction; etc.; \\n 11. Support the implementation of the established DDR strategy\/plan.", + "Paragraph": "A well-resourced, joint strategic and operational plan for the implementation of DDR in country x. \n Key tasks \n\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing planning capacities and physical resources to: \n 1. Establish all-inclusive joint planning mechanisms; \n 2. Develop a time-phased concept of the DDR operations; \n 3. Establish division of labour for key DDR tasks; \n 4. Estimate the broad resource requirements; \n 5. Start securing voluntary contributions; \n 6. Start the procurement of DDR items with long lead times; \n 7. Start the phased recruitment of personnel required from DPKO and other UN agencies; \n 8. Raise a military component from the armed forces of Member States for DDR activities; \n 9. Establish an effective public information campaign; \n 10. Establish programmatic links between the DDR operation and other areas of the mission\u2019s work: security sector reform; recovery and reconstruction; etc.; \n 11. Support the implementation of the established DDR strategy\/plan.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -45451,7 +45451,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 816, - "Paragraph": "A well-resourced, joint strategic and operational plan for the implementation of DDR in country x. \\n Key tasks \\n\\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing planning capacities and physical resources to: \\n 1. Establish all-inclusive joint planning mechanisms; \\n 2. Develop a time-phased concept of the DDR operations; \\n 3. Establish division of labour for key DDR tasks; \\n 4. Estimate the broad resource requirements; \\n 5. Start securing voluntary contributions; \\n 6. Start the procurement of DDR items with long lead times; \\n 7. Start the phased recruitment of personnel required from DPKO and other UN agencies; \\n 8. Raise a military component from the armed forces of Member States for DDR activities; \\n 9. Establish an effective public information campaign; \\n 10. Establish programmatic links between the DDR operation and other areas of the mission\u2019s work: security sector reform; recovery and reconstruction; etc.; \\n 11. Support the implementation of the established DDR strategy\/plan.", + "Paragraph": "A well-resourced, joint strategic and operational plan for the implementation of DDR in country x. \n Key tasks \n\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing planning capacities and physical resources to: \n 1. Establish all-inclusive joint planning mechanisms; \n 2. Develop a time-phased concept of the DDR operations; \n 3. Establish division of labour for key DDR tasks; \n 4. Estimate the broad resource requirements; \n 5. Start securing voluntary contributions; \n 6. Start the procurement of DDR items with long lead times; \n 7. Start the phased recruitment of personnel required from DPKO and other UN agencies; \n 8. Raise a military component from the armed forces of Member States for DDR activities; \n 9. Establish an effective public information campaign; \n 10. Establish programmatic links between the DDR operation and other areas of the mission\u2019s work: security sector reform; recovery and reconstruction; etc.; \n 11. Support the implementation of the established DDR strategy\/plan.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -45462,14 +45462,14 @@ "Heading2": "An example of DDR strategic objectives", "Heading3": "DDR strategic objective #2", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "; \\n 11.", + "Sentence": "; \n 11.", "newParagraph": "wellresourced joint strategic operational plan implementation ddr country x n key task nn un assist achieving aim providing planning capacity physical resource n 1 establish allinclusive joint planning mechanism n 2 develop timephased concept ddr operation n 3 establish division labour key ddr task n 4 estimate broad resource requirement n 5 start securing voluntary contribution n 6 start procurement ddr item long lead time n 7 start phased recruitment personnel required dpko un agency n 8 raise military component armed force member state ddr activity n 9 establish effective public information campaign n 10 establish programmatic link ddr operation area mission work security sector reform recovery reconstruction etc n 11 support implementation established ddr strategyplan", "ProcessedSent": " n 11", "SentID": 2525 }, { "ParagraphID": 816, - "Paragraph": "A well-resourced, joint strategic and operational plan for the implementation of DDR in country x. \\n Key tasks \\n\\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing planning capacities and physical resources to: \\n 1. Establish all-inclusive joint planning mechanisms; \\n 2. Develop a time-phased concept of the DDR operations; \\n 3. Establish division of labour for key DDR tasks; \\n 4. Estimate the broad resource requirements; \\n 5. Start securing voluntary contributions; \\n 6. Start the procurement of DDR items with long lead times; \\n 7. Start the phased recruitment of personnel required from DPKO and other UN agencies; \\n 8. Raise a military component from the armed forces of Member States for DDR activities; \\n 9. Establish an effective public information campaign; \\n 10. Establish programmatic links between the DDR operation and other areas of the mission\u2019s work: security sector reform; recovery and reconstruction; etc.; \\n 11. Support the implementation of the established DDR strategy\/plan.", + "Paragraph": "A well-resourced, joint strategic and operational plan for the implementation of DDR in country x. \n Key tasks \n\n The UN should assist in achieving this aim by providing planning capacities and physical resources to: \n 1. Establish all-inclusive joint planning mechanisms; \n 2. Develop a time-phased concept of the DDR operations; \n 3. Establish division of labour for key DDR tasks; \n 4. Estimate the broad resource requirements; \n 5. Start securing voluntary contributions; \n 6. Start the procurement of DDR items with long lead times; \n 7. Start the phased recruitment of personnel required from DPKO and other UN agencies; \n 8. Raise a military component from the armed forces of Member States for DDR activities; \n 9. Establish an effective public information campaign; \n 10. Establish programmatic links between the DDR operation and other areas of the mission\u2019s work: security sector reform; recovery and reconstruction; etc.; \n 11. Support the implementation of the established DDR strategy\/plan.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -45487,7 +45487,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 817, - "Paragraph": "A national weapons management programme and a regional strategy to stop the flow of small arms and light weapons into country x. \\n Key tasks \\n\\n To ensure a comprehensive approach to disarmament, the UN should also focus on the supply side of the weapons issue. In this regard, the UN can provide technical, political (good offices) and diplomatic support to: \\n assist the parties to establish and implement necessary weapons management legislation; \\n support country x\u2019s capacity to implement the UN \\n Programme of Action to Prevent, Com\u00ad bat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects in 2001 (A\/Conf.192\/15); \\n support regional initiatives to control the flow of illicit small arms and light weapons in the region.", + "Paragraph": "A national weapons management programme and a regional strategy to stop the flow of small arms and light weapons into country x. \n Key tasks \n\n To ensure a comprehensive approach to disarmament, the UN should also focus on the supply side of the weapons issue. In this regard, the UN can provide technical, political (good offices) and diplomatic support to: \n assist the parties to establish and implement necessary weapons management legislation; \n support country x\u2019s capacity to implement the UN \n Programme of Action to Prevent, Com\u00ad bat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects in 2001 (A\/Conf.192\/15); \n support regional initiatives to control the flow of illicit small arms and light weapons in the region.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -45505,7 +45505,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 817, - "Paragraph": "A national weapons management programme and a regional strategy to stop the flow of small arms and light weapons into country x. \\n Key tasks \\n\\n To ensure a comprehensive approach to disarmament, the UN should also focus on the supply side of the weapons issue. In this regard, the UN can provide technical, political (good offices) and diplomatic support to: \\n assist the parties to establish and implement necessary weapons management legislation; \\n support country x\u2019s capacity to implement the UN \\n Programme of Action to Prevent, Com\u00ad bat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects in 2001 (A\/Conf.192\/15); \\n support regional initiatives to control the flow of illicit small arms and light weapons in the region.", + "Paragraph": "A national weapons management programme and a regional strategy to stop the flow of small arms and light weapons into country x. \n Key tasks \n\n To ensure a comprehensive approach to disarmament, the UN should also focus on the supply side of the weapons issue. In this regard, the UN can provide technical, political (good offices) and diplomatic support to: \n assist the parties to establish and implement necessary weapons management legislation; \n support country x\u2019s capacity to implement the UN \n Programme of Action to Prevent, Com\u00ad bat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects in 2001 (A\/Conf.192\/15); \n support regional initiatives to control the flow of illicit small arms and light weapons in the region.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -45516,14 +45516,14 @@ "Heading2": "An example of DDR strategic objectives", "Heading3": "DDR strategic objective #3", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Key tasks \\n\\n To ensure a comprehensive approach to disarmament, the UN should also focus on the supply side of the weapons issue.", + "Sentence": "\n Key tasks \n\n To ensure a comprehensive approach to disarmament, the UN should also focus on the supply side of the weapons issue.", "newParagraph": "national weapon management programme regional strategy stop flow small arm light weapon country x n key task nn ensure comprehensive approach disarmament un also focus supply side weapon issue regard un provide technical political good office diplomatic support n assist party establish implement necessary weapon management legislation n support country x capacity implement un n programme action prevent com bat eradicate illicit trade small arm light weapon aspect 2001 aconf19215 n support regional initiative control flow illicit small arm light weapon region", "ProcessedSent": "n key task nn ensure comprehensive approach disarmament un also focus supply side weapon issue", "SentID": 2528 }, { "ParagraphID": 817, - "Paragraph": "A national weapons management programme and a regional strategy to stop the flow of small arms and light weapons into country x. \\n Key tasks \\n\\n To ensure a comprehensive approach to disarmament, the UN should also focus on the supply side of the weapons issue. In this regard, the UN can provide technical, political (good offices) and diplomatic support to: \\n assist the parties to establish and implement necessary weapons management legislation; \\n support country x\u2019s capacity to implement the UN \\n Programme of Action to Prevent, Com\u00ad bat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects in 2001 (A\/Conf.192\/15); \\n support regional initiatives to control the flow of illicit small arms and light weapons in the region.", + "Paragraph": "A national weapons management programme and a regional strategy to stop the flow of small arms and light weapons into country x. \n Key tasks \n\n To ensure a comprehensive approach to disarmament, the UN should also focus on the supply side of the weapons issue. In this regard, the UN can provide technical, political (good offices) and diplomatic support to: \n assist the parties to establish and implement necessary weapons management legislation; \n support country x\u2019s capacity to implement the UN \n Programme of Action to Prevent, Com\u00ad bat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects in 2001 (A\/Conf.192\/15); \n support regional initiatives to control the flow of illicit small arms and light weapons in the region.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -45534,14 +45534,14 @@ "Heading2": "An example of DDR strategic objectives", "Heading3": "DDR strategic objective #3", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "In this regard, the UN can provide technical, political (good offices) and diplomatic support to: \\n assist the parties to establish and implement necessary weapons management legislation; \\n support country x\u2019s capacity to implement the UN \\n Programme of Action to Prevent, Com\u00ad bat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects in 2001 (A\/Conf.192\/15); \\n support regional initiatives to control the flow of illicit small arms and light weapons in the region.", + "Sentence": "In this regard, the UN can provide technical, political (good offices) and diplomatic support to: \n assist the parties to establish and implement necessary weapons management legislation; \n support country x\u2019s capacity to implement the UN \n Programme of Action to Prevent, Com\u00ad bat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects in 2001 (A\/Conf.192\/15); \n support regional initiatives to control the flow of illicit small arms and light weapons in the region.", "newParagraph": "national weapon management programme regional strategy stop flow small arm light weapon country x n key task nn ensure comprehensive approach disarmament un also focus supply side weapon issue regard un provide technical political good office diplomatic support n assist party establish implement necessary weapon management legislation n support country x capacity implement un n programme action prevent com bat eradicate illicit trade small arm light weapon aspect 2001 aconf19215 n support regional initiative control flow illicit small arm light weapon region", "ProcessedSent": "regard un provide technical political good office diplomatic support n assist party establish implement necessary weapon management legislation n support country x capacity implement un n programme action prevent com bat eradicate illicit trade small arm light weapon aspect 2001 aconf19215 n support regional initiative control flow illicit small arm light weapon region", "SentID": 2529 }, { "ParagraphID": 818, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 A good source for this information is the relevant Small Arms Survey report; see http:\/\/www.small- armssurvey.org. \\n 2 In Liberia, the dispute over the allocation of ministerial positions resulted in the walkout of junior members of the three factions in the first meeting of the National Commission on Disarmament, Demobilization, Rehabilitation and Reintegration in 2003, while uncertainty and disagreement over elections delayed the start of the DDR programme in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 A good source for this information is the relevant Small Arms Survey report; see http:\/\/www.small- armssurvey.org. \n 2 In Liberia, the dispute over the allocation of ministerial positions resulted in the walkout of junior members of the three factions in the first meeting of the National Commission on Disarmament, Demobilization, Rehabilitation and Reintegration in 2003, while uncertainty and disagreement over elections delayed the start of the DDR programme in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -45552,14 +45552,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 1 A good source for this information is the relevant Small Arms Survey report; see http:\/\/www.small- armssurvey.org.", + "Sentence": "\n 1 A good source for this information is the relevant Small Arms Survey report; see http:\/\/www.small- armssurvey.org.", "newParagraph": "n 1 good source information relevant small arm survey report see httpwwwsmall armssurveyorg n 2 liberia dispute allocation ministerial position resulted walkout junior member three faction first meeting national commission disarmament demobilization rehabilitation reintegration 2003 uncertainty disagreement election delayed start ddr programme c\u00f4te ivoire", "ProcessedSent": "n 1 good source information relevant small arm survey report see httpwwwsmall armssurveyorg", "SentID": 2530 }, { "ParagraphID": 818, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 A good source for this information is the relevant Small Arms Survey report; see http:\/\/www.small- armssurvey.org. \\n 2 In Liberia, the dispute over the allocation of ministerial positions resulted in the walkout of junior members of the three factions in the first meeting of the National Commission on Disarmament, Demobilization, Rehabilitation and Reintegration in 2003, while uncertainty and disagreement over elections delayed the start of the DDR programme in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 A good source for this information is the relevant Small Arms Survey report; see http:\/\/www.small- armssurvey.org. \n 2 In Liberia, the dispute over the allocation of ministerial positions resulted in the walkout of junior members of the three factions in the first meeting of the National Commission on Disarmament, Demobilization, Rehabilitation and Reintegration in 2003, while uncertainty and disagreement over elections delayed the start of the DDR programme in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -45570,7 +45570,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 2 In Liberia, the dispute over the allocation of ministerial positions resulted in the walkout of junior members of the three factions in the first meeting of the National Commission on Disarmament, Demobilization, Rehabilitation and Reintegration in 2003, while uncertainty and disagreement over elections delayed the start of the DDR programme in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire.", + "Sentence": "\n 2 In Liberia, the dispute over the allocation of ministerial positions resulted in the walkout of junior members of the three factions in the first meeting of the National Commission on Disarmament, Demobilization, Rehabilitation and Reintegration in 2003, while uncertainty and disagreement over elections delayed the start of the DDR programme in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire.", "newParagraph": "n 1 good source information relevant small arm survey report see httpwwwsmall armssurveyorg n 2 liberia dispute allocation ministerial position resulted walkout junior member three faction first meeting national commission disarmament demobilization rehabilitation reintegration 2003 uncertainty disagreement election delayed start ddr programme c\u00f4te ivoire", "ProcessedSent": "n 2 liberia dispute allocation ministerial position resulted walkout junior member three faction first meeting national commission disarmament demobilization rehabilitation reintegration 2003 uncertainty disagreement election delayed start ddr programme c\u00f4te ivoire", "SentID": 2531 @@ -46009,7 +46009,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 828, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -46027,7 +46027,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 828, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -46038,14 +46038,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard.", + "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard.", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may used indicate intended degree compliance use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "ProcessedSent": "use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard", "SentID": 2557 }, { "ParagraphID": 828, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -46056,14 +46056,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications.", + "Sentence": "\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications.", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may used indicate intended degree compliance use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "ProcessedSent": "n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification", "SentID": 2558 }, { "ParagraphID": 828, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -46074,7 +46074,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Sentence": "\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may used indicate intended degree compliance use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "ProcessedSent": "n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "SentID": 2559 @@ -46207,7 +46207,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 833, - "Paragraph": "In general, the programme design cycle consists of three main stages: \\n I: Conducting a detailed field assessment; \\n II: Preparing the programme document and budget; \\n III: Developing an implementation plan.", + "Paragraph": "In general, the programme design cycle consists of three main stages: \n I: Conducting a detailed field assessment; \n II: Preparing the programme document and budget; \n III: Developing an implementation plan.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -46218,7 +46218,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "In general, the programme design cycle consists of three main stages: \\n I: Conducting a detailed field assessment; \\n II: Preparing the programme document and budget; \\n III: Developing an implementation plan.", + "Sentence": "In general, the programme design cycle consists of three main stages: \n I: Conducting a detailed field assessment; \n II: Preparing the programme document and budget; \n III: Developing an implementation plan.", "newParagraph": "general programme design cycle consists three main stage n conducting detailed field assessment n ii preparing programme document budget n iii developing implementation plan", "ProcessedSent": "general programme design cycle consists three main stage n conducting detailed field assessment n ii preparing programme document budget n iii developing implementation plan", "SentID": 2567 @@ -46297,7 +46297,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 836, - "Paragraph": "A detailed field assessment builds on assessments and planning for DDR that have been carried out in the pre\u00adplanning and technical assessment stages of the planning process (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures). Contributing to the design of the DDR programme, the detailed field assessment: \\n deepens understanding of key DDR issues and the broader operating environment; \\n verifies information gathered during the technical assessment mission; \\n verifies the assumptions on which planning will be based, and defines the overall approach of DDR; \\n identifies key priority objectives, issues of concern, and target and performance indicators; \\n identifies operational DDR options and interventions that are precisely targeted, realistic and sustainable.", + "Paragraph": "A detailed field assessment builds on assessments and planning for DDR that have been carried out in the pre\u00adplanning and technical assessment stages of the planning process (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures). Contributing to the design of the DDR programme, the detailed field assessment: \n deepens understanding of key DDR issues and the broader operating environment; \n verifies information gathered during the technical assessment mission; \n verifies the assumptions on which planning will be based, and defines the overall approach of DDR; \n identifies key priority objectives, issues of concern, and target and performance indicators; \n identifies operational DDR options and interventions that are precisely targeted, realistic and sustainable.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -46315,7 +46315,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 836, - "Paragraph": "A detailed field assessment builds on assessments and planning for DDR that have been carried out in the pre\u00adplanning and technical assessment stages of the planning process (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures). Contributing to the design of the DDR programme, the detailed field assessment: \\n deepens understanding of key DDR issues and the broader operating environment; \\n verifies information gathered during the technical assessment mission; \\n verifies the assumptions on which planning will be based, and defines the overall approach of DDR; \\n identifies key priority objectives, issues of concern, and target and performance indicators; \\n identifies operational DDR options and interventions that are precisely targeted, realistic and sustainable.", + "Paragraph": "A detailed field assessment builds on assessments and planning for DDR that have been carried out in the pre\u00adplanning and technical assessment stages of the planning process (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures). Contributing to the design of the DDR programme, the detailed field assessment: \n deepens understanding of key DDR issues and the broader operating environment; \n verifies information gathered during the technical assessment mission; \n verifies the assumptions on which planning will be based, and defines the overall approach of DDR; \n identifies key priority objectives, issues of concern, and target and performance indicators; \n identifies operational DDR options and interventions that are precisely targeted, realistic and sustainable.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -46326,14 +46326,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1. Objectives", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Contributing to the design of the DDR programme, the detailed field assessment: \\n deepens understanding of key DDR issues and the broader operating environment; \\n verifies information gathered during the technical assessment mission; \\n verifies the assumptions on which planning will be based, and defines the overall approach of DDR; \\n identifies key priority objectives, issues of concern, and target and performance indicators; \\n identifies operational DDR options and interventions that are precisely targeted, realistic and sustainable.", + "Sentence": "Contributing to the design of the DDR programme, the detailed field assessment: \n deepens understanding of key DDR issues and the broader operating environment; \n verifies information gathered during the technical assessment mission; \n verifies the assumptions on which planning will be based, and defines the overall approach of DDR; \n identifies key priority objectives, issues of concern, and target and performance indicators; \n identifies operational DDR options and interventions that are precisely targeted, realistic and sustainable.", "newParagraph": "detailed field assessment build assessment planning ddr carried pre planning technical assessment stage planning process also see iddrs 310 integrated ddr planning process structure contributing design ddr programme detailed field assessment n deepens understanding key ddr issue broader operating environment n verifies information gathered technical assessment mission n verifies assumption planning based defines overall approach ddr n identifies key priority objective issue concern target performance indicator n identifies operational ddr option intervention precisely targeted realistic sustainable", "ProcessedSent": "contributing design ddr programme detailed field assessment n deepens understanding key ddr issue broader operating environment n verifies information gathered technical assessment mission n verifies assumption planning based defines overall approach ddr n identifies key priority objective issue concern target performance indicator n identifies operational ddr option intervention precisely targeted realistic sustainable", "SentID": 2573 }, { "ParagraphID": 837, - "Paragraph": "The following should be considered when planning a detailed field assessment for DDR: \\n Scope: From the start of DDR, practitioners should determine the geographical area that will be covered by the programme, how long the programme will last, and the level of detail and accuracy needed for its smooth running and financing. The scope and depth of this detailed field assessment will depend on the amount of information gathered in previous assessments, such as the technical assessment mission. The current political and military situation in the country concerned and the amount of access possible to areas where combatants are located should also be carefully considered; \\n Thematic areas of focus: The detailed field assessment should deepen understanding, analysis and assessments conducted in the pre\u00admission period. It therefore builds on information gathered on the following thematic areas: \\n\\n political, social and economic context and background; \\n\\n causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \\n\\n identification of specific groups, potential partners and others involved in the discussion process; \\n\\n distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \\n\\n institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \\n\\n survey of socio\u00adeconomic conditions and local capacities to absorb ex\u00adcombatants and their dependants; \\n\\n preconditions and other factors that will influence DDR; \\n\\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \\n\\n (Also see Annex B of IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures.); \\n Expertise: The next step is to identify the DDR expertise required. Assessment teams should be composed of specialists in all aspects of DDR (see IDDRS Level 5 for more information on the different needs that have to be met during a DDR mission). To ensure coherence with the political process and overall objectives of the peacekeeping mandate, the assessment should be led by a member of the UN DDR unit; \\n Local participation: Where the political situation allows, national and local participation in the assessment should be emphasized to ensure that local analyses of the situation, the needs and appropriate solutions are reflected and included in the DDR pro\u00ad gramme. There is a need, however, to be aware of local bias, especially in the tense immediate post\u00adconflict environment; \\n Building confidence and managing expectations: Where possible, detailed field assessments should be linked with preparatory assistance projects and initiatives (e.g., community development programmes and quick\u00adimpact projects) to build confidence in and support for the DDR programme. Care must be taken, however, not to raise unrealistic expec\u00ad tations of the DDR programme; \\n Design of the field assessment: Before starting the assessment, DDR practitioners should: \\n\\n identify the research objectives and indicators (what are we assessing?); \\n\\n identify the sources and methods for data collection (where are we going to obtain our information?); \\n\\n develop appropriate analytical tools and techniques (how are we going to make sense of our data?); \\n\\n develop a method for interpreting the findings in a practical way (how are we going to apply the results?); \\n Being flexible: Thinking about and answering these questions are essential to developing a well\u00addesigned approach and work plan that allows for a systematic and well\u00adstructured data collection process. Naturally, the approach will change once data collection begins in the field, but this should not in any way reduce its importance as an initial guiding blueprint.", + "Paragraph": "The following should be considered when planning a detailed field assessment for DDR: \n Scope: From the start of DDR, practitioners should determine the geographical area that will be covered by the programme, how long the programme will last, and the level of detail and accuracy needed for its smooth running and financing. The scope and depth of this detailed field assessment will depend on the amount of information gathered in previous assessments, such as the technical assessment mission. The current political and military situation in the country concerned and the amount of access possible to areas where combatants are located should also be carefully considered; \n Thematic areas of focus: The detailed field assessment should deepen understanding, analysis and assessments conducted in the pre\u00admission period. It therefore builds on information gathered on the following thematic areas: \n\n political, social and economic context and background; \n\n causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \n\n identification of specific groups, potential partners and others involved in the discussion process; \n\n distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \n\n institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \n\n survey of socio\u00adeconomic conditions and local capacities to absorb ex\u00adcombatants and their dependants; \n\n preconditions and other factors that will influence DDR; \n\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \n\n (Also see Annex B of IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures.); \n Expertise: The next step is to identify the DDR expertise required. Assessment teams should be composed of specialists in all aspects of DDR (see IDDRS Level 5 for more information on the different needs that have to be met during a DDR mission). To ensure coherence with the political process and overall objectives of the peacekeeping mandate, the assessment should be led by a member of the UN DDR unit; \n Local participation: Where the political situation allows, national and local participation in the assessment should be emphasized to ensure that local analyses of the situation, the needs and appropriate solutions are reflected and included in the DDR pro\u00ad gramme. There is a need, however, to be aware of local bias, especially in the tense immediate post\u00adconflict environment; \n Building confidence and managing expectations: Where possible, detailed field assessments should be linked with preparatory assistance projects and initiatives (e.g., community development programmes and quick\u00adimpact projects) to build confidence in and support for the DDR programme. Care must be taken, however, not to raise unrealistic expec\u00ad tations of the DDR programme; \n Design of the field assessment: Before starting the assessment, DDR practitioners should: \n\n identify the research objectives and indicators (what are we assessing?); \n\n identify the sources and methods for data collection (where are we going to obtain our information?); \n\n develop appropriate analytical tools and techniques (how are we going to make sense of our data?); \n\n develop a method for interpreting the findings in a practical way (how are we going to apply the results?); \n Being flexible: Thinking about and answering these questions are essential to developing a well\u00addesigned approach and work plan that allows for a systematic and well\u00adstructured data collection process. Naturally, the approach will change once data collection begins in the field, but this should not in any way reduce its importance as an initial guiding blueprint.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -46344,14 +46344,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Planning for an assessment", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The following should be considered when planning a detailed field assessment for DDR: \\n Scope: From the start of DDR, practitioners should determine the geographical area that will be covered by the programme, how long the programme will last, and the level of detail and accuracy needed for its smooth running and financing.", + "Sentence": "The following should be considered when planning a detailed field assessment for DDR: \n Scope: From the start of DDR, practitioners should determine the geographical area that will be covered by the programme, how long the programme will last, and the level of detail and accuracy needed for its smooth running and financing.", "newParagraph": "following considered planning detailed field assessment ddr n scope start ddr practitioner determine geographical area covered programme long programme last level detail accuracy needed smooth running financing scope depth detailed field assessment depend amount information gathered previous assessment technical assessment mission current political military situation country concerned amount access possible area combatant located also carefully considered n thematic area focus detailed field assessment deepen understanding analysis assessment conducted pre mission period therefore build information gathered following thematic area nn political social economic context background nn cause dynamic consequence armed conflict nn identification specific group potential partner others involved discussion process nn distribution availability proliferation weapon primarily small arm light weapon nn institutional capacity national stakeholder area related ddr nn survey socio economic condition local capacity absorb ex combatant dependant nn precondition factor influence ddr nn baseline data performance indicator programme design implementation monitoring evaluation nn also see annex b iddrs 310 integrated ddr planning process structure n expertise next step identify ddr expertise required assessment team composed specialist aspect ddr see iddrs level 5 information different need met ddr mission ensure coherence political process overall objective peacekeeping mandate assessment led member un ddr unit n local participation political situation allows national local participation assessment emphasized ensure local analysis situation need appropriate solution reflected included ddr pro gramme need however aware local bias especially tense immediate post conflict environment n building confidence managing expectation possible detailed field assessment linked preparatory assistance project initiative eg community development programme quick impact project build confidence support ddr programme care must taken however raise unrealistic expec tations ddr programme n design field assessment starting assessment ddr practitioner nn identify research objective indicator assessing nn identify source method data collection going obtain information nn develop appropriate analytical tool technique going make sense data nn develop method interpreting finding practical way going apply result n flexible thinking answering question essential developing well designed approach work plan allows systematic well structured data collection process naturally approach change data collection begin field way reduce importance initial guiding blueprint", "ProcessedSent": "following considered planning detailed field assessment ddr n scope start ddr practitioner determine geographical area covered programme long programme last level detail accuracy needed smooth running financing", "SentID": 2574 }, { "ParagraphID": 837, - "Paragraph": "The following should be considered when planning a detailed field assessment for DDR: \\n Scope: From the start of DDR, practitioners should determine the geographical area that will be covered by the programme, how long the programme will last, and the level of detail and accuracy needed for its smooth running and financing. The scope and depth of this detailed field assessment will depend on the amount of information gathered in previous assessments, such as the technical assessment mission. The current political and military situation in the country concerned and the amount of access possible to areas where combatants are located should also be carefully considered; \\n Thematic areas of focus: The detailed field assessment should deepen understanding, analysis and assessments conducted in the pre\u00admission period. It therefore builds on information gathered on the following thematic areas: \\n\\n political, social and economic context and background; \\n\\n causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \\n\\n identification of specific groups, potential partners and others involved in the discussion process; \\n\\n distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \\n\\n institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \\n\\n survey of socio\u00adeconomic conditions and local capacities to absorb ex\u00adcombatants and their dependants; \\n\\n preconditions and other factors that will influence DDR; \\n\\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \\n\\n (Also see Annex B of IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures.); \\n Expertise: The next step is to identify the DDR expertise required. Assessment teams should be composed of specialists in all aspects of DDR (see IDDRS Level 5 for more information on the different needs that have to be met during a DDR mission). To ensure coherence with the political process and overall objectives of the peacekeeping mandate, the assessment should be led by a member of the UN DDR unit; \\n Local participation: Where the political situation allows, national and local participation in the assessment should be emphasized to ensure that local analyses of the situation, the needs and appropriate solutions are reflected and included in the DDR pro\u00ad gramme. There is a need, however, to be aware of local bias, especially in the tense immediate post\u00adconflict environment; \\n Building confidence and managing expectations: Where possible, detailed field assessments should be linked with preparatory assistance projects and initiatives (e.g., community development programmes and quick\u00adimpact projects) to build confidence in and support for the DDR programme. Care must be taken, however, not to raise unrealistic expec\u00ad tations of the DDR programme; \\n Design of the field assessment: Before starting the assessment, DDR practitioners should: \\n\\n identify the research objectives and indicators (what are we assessing?); \\n\\n identify the sources and methods for data collection (where are we going to obtain our information?); \\n\\n develop appropriate analytical tools and techniques (how are we going to make sense of our data?); \\n\\n develop a method for interpreting the findings in a practical way (how are we going to apply the results?); \\n Being flexible: Thinking about and answering these questions are essential to developing a well\u00addesigned approach and work plan that allows for a systematic and well\u00adstructured data collection process. Naturally, the approach will change once data collection begins in the field, but this should not in any way reduce its importance as an initial guiding blueprint.", + "Paragraph": "The following should be considered when planning a detailed field assessment for DDR: \n Scope: From the start of DDR, practitioners should determine the geographical area that will be covered by the programme, how long the programme will last, and the level of detail and accuracy needed for its smooth running and financing. The scope and depth of this detailed field assessment will depend on the amount of information gathered in previous assessments, such as the technical assessment mission. The current political and military situation in the country concerned and the amount of access possible to areas where combatants are located should also be carefully considered; \n Thematic areas of focus: The detailed field assessment should deepen understanding, analysis and assessments conducted in the pre\u00admission period. It therefore builds on information gathered on the following thematic areas: \n\n political, social and economic context and background; \n\n causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \n\n identification of specific groups, potential partners and others involved in the discussion process; \n\n distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \n\n institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \n\n survey of socio\u00adeconomic conditions and local capacities to absorb ex\u00adcombatants and their dependants; \n\n preconditions and other factors that will influence DDR; \n\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \n\n (Also see Annex B of IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures.); \n Expertise: The next step is to identify the DDR expertise required. Assessment teams should be composed of specialists in all aspects of DDR (see IDDRS Level 5 for more information on the different needs that have to be met during a DDR mission). To ensure coherence with the political process and overall objectives of the peacekeeping mandate, the assessment should be led by a member of the UN DDR unit; \n Local participation: Where the political situation allows, national and local participation in the assessment should be emphasized to ensure that local analyses of the situation, the needs and appropriate solutions are reflected and included in the DDR pro\u00ad gramme. There is a need, however, to be aware of local bias, especially in the tense immediate post\u00adconflict environment; \n Building confidence and managing expectations: Where possible, detailed field assessments should be linked with preparatory assistance projects and initiatives (e.g., community development programmes and quick\u00adimpact projects) to build confidence in and support for the DDR programme. Care must be taken, however, not to raise unrealistic expec\u00ad tations of the DDR programme; \n Design of the field assessment: Before starting the assessment, DDR practitioners should: \n\n identify the research objectives and indicators (what are we assessing?); \n\n identify the sources and methods for data collection (where are we going to obtain our information?); \n\n develop appropriate analytical tools and techniques (how are we going to make sense of our data?); \n\n develop a method for interpreting the findings in a practical way (how are we going to apply the results?); \n Being flexible: Thinking about and answering these questions are essential to developing a well\u00addesigned approach and work plan that allows for a systematic and well\u00adstructured data collection process. Naturally, the approach will change once data collection begins in the field, but this should not in any way reduce its importance as an initial guiding blueprint.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -46369,7 +46369,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 837, - "Paragraph": "The following should be considered when planning a detailed field assessment for DDR: \\n Scope: From the start of DDR, practitioners should determine the geographical area that will be covered by the programme, how long the programme will last, and the level of detail and accuracy needed for its smooth running and financing. The scope and depth of this detailed field assessment will depend on the amount of information gathered in previous assessments, such as the technical assessment mission. The current political and military situation in the country concerned and the amount of access possible to areas where combatants are located should also be carefully considered; \\n Thematic areas of focus: The detailed field assessment should deepen understanding, analysis and assessments conducted in the pre\u00admission period. It therefore builds on information gathered on the following thematic areas: \\n\\n political, social and economic context and background; \\n\\n causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \\n\\n identification of specific groups, potential partners and others involved in the discussion process; \\n\\n distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \\n\\n institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \\n\\n survey of socio\u00adeconomic conditions and local capacities to absorb ex\u00adcombatants and their dependants; \\n\\n preconditions and other factors that will influence DDR; \\n\\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \\n\\n (Also see Annex B of IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures.); \\n Expertise: The next step is to identify the DDR expertise required. Assessment teams should be composed of specialists in all aspects of DDR (see IDDRS Level 5 for more information on the different needs that have to be met during a DDR mission). To ensure coherence with the political process and overall objectives of the peacekeeping mandate, the assessment should be led by a member of the UN DDR unit; \\n Local participation: Where the political situation allows, national and local participation in the assessment should be emphasized to ensure that local analyses of the situation, the needs and appropriate solutions are reflected and included in the DDR pro\u00ad gramme. There is a need, however, to be aware of local bias, especially in the tense immediate post\u00adconflict environment; \\n Building confidence and managing expectations: Where possible, detailed field assessments should be linked with preparatory assistance projects and initiatives (e.g., community development programmes and quick\u00adimpact projects) to build confidence in and support for the DDR programme. Care must be taken, however, not to raise unrealistic expec\u00ad tations of the DDR programme; \\n Design of the field assessment: Before starting the assessment, DDR practitioners should: \\n\\n identify the research objectives and indicators (what are we assessing?); \\n\\n identify the sources and methods for data collection (where are we going to obtain our information?); \\n\\n develop appropriate analytical tools and techniques (how are we going to make sense of our data?); \\n\\n develop a method for interpreting the findings in a practical way (how are we going to apply the results?); \\n Being flexible: Thinking about and answering these questions are essential to developing a well\u00addesigned approach and work plan that allows for a systematic and well\u00adstructured data collection process. Naturally, the approach will change once data collection begins in the field, but this should not in any way reduce its importance as an initial guiding blueprint.", + "Paragraph": "The following should be considered when planning a detailed field assessment for DDR: \n Scope: From the start of DDR, practitioners should determine the geographical area that will be covered by the programme, how long the programme will last, and the level of detail and accuracy needed for its smooth running and financing. The scope and depth of this detailed field assessment will depend on the amount of information gathered in previous assessments, such as the technical assessment mission. The current political and military situation in the country concerned and the amount of access possible to areas where combatants are located should also be carefully considered; \n Thematic areas of focus: The detailed field assessment should deepen understanding, analysis and assessments conducted in the pre\u00admission period. It therefore builds on information gathered on the following thematic areas: \n\n political, social and economic context and background; \n\n causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \n\n identification of specific groups, potential partners and others involved in the discussion process; \n\n distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \n\n institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \n\n survey of socio\u00adeconomic conditions and local capacities to absorb ex\u00adcombatants and their dependants; \n\n preconditions and other factors that will influence DDR; \n\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \n\n (Also see Annex B of IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures.); \n Expertise: The next step is to identify the DDR expertise required. Assessment teams should be composed of specialists in all aspects of DDR (see IDDRS Level 5 for more information on the different needs that have to be met during a DDR mission). To ensure coherence with the political process and overall objectives of the peacekeeping mandate, the assessment should be led by a member of the UN DDR unit; \n Local participation: Where the political situation allows, national and local participation in the assessment should be emphasized to ensure that local analyses of the situation, the needs and appropriate solutions are reflected and included in the DDR pro\u00ad gramme. There is a need, however, to be aware of local bias, especially in the tense immediate post\u00adconflict environment; \n Building confidence and managing expectations: Where possible, detailed field assessments should be linked with preparatory assistance projects and initiatives (e.g., community development programmes and quick\u00adimpact projects) to build confidence in and support for the DDR programme. Care must be taken, however, not to raise unrealistic expec\u00ad tations of the DDR programme; \n Design of the field assessment: Before starting the assessment, DDR practitioners should: \n\n identify the research objectives and indicators (what are we assessing?); \n\n identify the sources and methods for data collection (where are we going to obtain our information?); \n\n develop appropriate analytical tools and techniques (how are we going to make sense of our data?); \n\n develop a method for interpreting the findings in a practical way (how are we going to apply the results?); \n Being flexible: Thinking about and answering these questions are essential to developing a well\u00addesigned approach and work plan that allows for a systematic and well\u00adstructured data collection process. Naturally, the approach will change once data collection begins in the field, but this should not in any way reduce its importance as an initial guiding blueprint.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -46380,14 +46380,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Planning for an assessment", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The current political and military situation in the country concerned and the amount of access possible to areas where combatants are located should also be carefully considered; \\n Thematic areas of focus: The detailed field assessment should deepen understanding, analysis and assessments conducted in the pre\u00admission period.", + "Sentence": "The current political and military situation in the country concerned and the amount of access possible to areas where combatants are located should also be carefully considered; \n Thematic areas of focus: The detailed field assessment should deepen understanding, analysis and assessments conducted in the pre\u00admission period.", "newParagraph": "following considered planning detailed field assessment ddr n scope start ddr practitioner determine geographical area covered programme long programme last level detail accuracy needed smooth running financing scope depth detailed field assessment depend amount information gathered previous assessment technical assessment mission current political military situation country concerned amount access possible area combatant located also carefully considered n thematic area focus detailed field assessment deepen understanding analysis assessment conducted pre mission period therefore build information gathered following thematic area nn political social economic context background nn cause dynamic consequence armed conflict nn identification specific group potential partner others involved discussion process nn distribution availability proliferation weapon primarily small arm light weapon nn institutional capacity national stakeholder area related ddr nn survey socio economic condition local capacity absorb ex combatant dependant nn precondition factor influence ddr nn baseline data performance indicator programme design implementation monitoring evaluation nn also see annex b iddrs 310 integrated ddr planning process structure n expertise next step identify ddr expertise required assessment team composed specialist aspect ddr see iddrs level 5 information different need met ddr mission ensure coherence political process overall objective peacekeeping mandate assessment led member un ddr unit n local participation political situation allows national local participation assessment emphasized ensure local analysis situation need appropriate solution reflected included ddr pro gramme need however aware local bias especially tense immediate post conflict environment n building confidence managing expectation possible detailed field assessment linked preparatory assistance project initiative eg community development programme quick impact project build confidence support ddr programme care must taken however raise unrealistic expec tations ddr programme n design field assessment starting assessment ddr practitioner nn identify research objective indicator assessing nn identify source method data collection going obtain information nn develop appropriate analytical tool technique going make sense data nn develop method interpreting finding practical way going apply result n flexible thinking answering question essential developing well designed approach work plan allows systematic well structured data collection process naturally approach change data collection begin field way reduce importance initial guiding blueprint", "ProcessedSent": "current political military situation country concerned amount access possible area combatant located also carefully considered n thematic area focus detailed field assessment deepen understanding analysis assessment conducted pre mission period", "SentID": 2576 }, { "ParagraphID": 837, - "Paragraph": "The following should be considered when planning a detailed field assessment for DDR: \\n Scope: From the start of DDR, practitioners should determine the geographical area that will be covered by the programme, how long the programme will last, and the level of detail and accuracy needed for its smooth running and financing. The scope and depth of this detailed field assessment will depend on the amount of information gathered in previous assessments, such as the technical assessment mission. The current political and military situation in the country concerned and the amount of access possible to areas where combatants are located should also be carefully considered; \\n Thematic areas of focus: The detailed field assessment should deepen understanding, analysis and assessments conducted in the pre\u00admission period. It therefore builds on information gathered on the following thematic areas: \\n\\n political, social and economic context and background; \\n\\n causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \\n\\n identification of specific groups, potential partners and others involved in the discussion process; \\n\\n distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \\n\\n institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \\n\\n survey of socio\u00adeconomic conditions and local capacities to absorb ex\u00adcombatants and their dependants; \\n\\n preconditions and other factors that will influence DDR; \\n\\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \\n\\n (Also see Annex B of IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures.); \\n Expertise: The next step is to identify the DDR expertise required. Assessment teams should be composed of specialists in all aspects of DDR (see IDDRS Level 5 for more information on the different needs that have to be met during a DDR mission). To ensure coherence with the political process and overall objectives of the peacekeeping mandate, the assessment should be led by a member of the UN DDR unit; \\n Local participation: Where the political situation allows, national and local participation in the assessment should be emphasized to ensure that local analyses of the situation, the needs and appropriate solutions are reflected and included in the DDR pro\u00ad gramme. There is a need, however, to be aware of local bias, especially in the tense immediate post\u00adconflict environment; \\n Building confidence and managing expectations: Where possible, detailed field assessments should be linked with preparatory assistance projects and initiatives (e.g., community development programmes and quick\u00adimpact projects) to build confidence in and support for the DDR programme. Care must be taken, however, not to raise unrealistic expec\u00ad tations of the DDR programme; \\n Design of the field assessment: Before starting the assessment, DDR practitioners should: \\n\\n identify the research objectives and indicators (what are we assessing?); \\n\\n identify the sources and methods for data collection (where are we going to obtain our information?); \\n\\n develop appropriate analytical tools and techniques (how are we going to make sense of our data?); \\n\\n develop a method for interpreting the findings in a practical way (how are we going to apply the results?); \\n Being flexible: Thinking about and answering these questions are essential to developing a well\u00addesigned approach and work plan that allows for a systematic and well\u00adstructured data collection process. Naturally, the approach will change once data collection begins in the field, but this should not in any way reduce its importance as an initial guiding blueprint.", + "Paragraph": "The following should be considered when planning a detailed field assessment for DDR: \n Scope: From the start of DDR, practitioners should determine the geographical area that will be covered by the programme, how long the programme will last, and the level of detail and accuracy needed for its smooth running and financing. The scope and depth of this detailed field assessment will depend on the amount of information gathered in previous assessments, such as the technical assessment mission. The current political and military situation in the country concerned and the amount of access possible to areas where combatants are located should also be carefully considered; \n Thematic areas of focus: The detailed field assessment should deepen understanding, analysis and assessments conducted in the pre\u00admission period. It therefore builds on information gathered on the following thematic areas: \n\n political, social and economic context and background; \n\n causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \n\n identification of specific groups, potential partners and others involved in the discussion process; \n\n distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \n\n institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \n\n survey of socio\u00adeconomic conditions and local capacities to absorb ex\u00adcombatants and their dependants; \n\n preconditions and other factors that will influence DDR; \n\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \n\n (Also see Annex B of IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures.); \n Expertise: The next step is to identify the DDR expertise required. Assessment teams should be composed of specialists in all aspects of DDR (see IDDRS Level 5 for more information on the different needs that have to be met during a DDR mission). To ensure coherence with the political process and overall objectives of the peacekeeping mandate, the assessment should be led by a member of the UN DDR unit; \n Local participation: Where the political situation allows, national and local participation in the assessment should be emphasized to ensure that local analyses of the situation, the needs and appropriate solutions are reflected and included in the DDR pro\u00ad gramme. There is a need, however, to be aware of local bias, especially in the tense immediate post\u00adconflict environment; \n Building confidence and managing expectations: Where possible, detailed field assessments should be linked with preparatory assistance projects and initiatives (e.g., community development programmes and quick\u00adimpact projects) to build confidence in and support for the DDR programme. Care must be taken, however, not to raise unrealistic expec\u00ad tations of the DDR programme; \n Design of the field assessment: Before starting the assessment, DDR practitioners should: \n\n identify the research objectives and indicators (what are we assessing?); \n\n identify the sources and methods for data collection (where are we going to obtain our information?); \n\n develop appropriate analytical tools and techniques (how are we going to make sense of our data?); \n\n develop a method for interpreting the findings in a practical way (how are we going to apply the results?); \n Being flexible: Thinking about and answering these questions are essential to developing a well\u00addesigned approach and work plan that allows for a systematic and well\u00adstructured data collection process. Naturally, the approach will change once data collection begins in the field, but this should not in any way reduce its importance as an initial guiding blueprint.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -46398,14 +46398,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Planning for an assessment", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "It therefore builds on information gathered on the following thematic areas: \\n\\n political, social and economic context and background; \\n\\n causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \\n\\n identification of specific groups, potential partners and others involved in the discussion process; \\n\\n distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \\n\\n institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \\n\\n survey of socio\u00adeconomic conditions and local capacities to absorb ex\u00adcombatants and their dependants; \\n\\n preconditions and other factors that will influence DDR; \\n\\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation.", + "Sentence": "It therefore builds on information gathered on the following thematic areas: \n\n political, social and economic context and background; \n\n causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \n\n identification of specific groups, potential partners and others involved in the discussion process; \n\n distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \n\n institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \n\n survey of socio\u00adeconomic conditions and local capacities to absorb ex\u00adcombatants and their dependants; \n\n preconditions and other factors that will influence DDR; \n\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation.", "newParagraph": "following considered planning detailed field assessment ddr n scope start ddr practitioner determine geographical area covered programme long programme last level detail accuracy needed smooth running financing scope depth detailed field assessment depend amount information gathered previous assessment technical assessment mission current political military situation country concerned amount access possible area combatant located also carefully considered n thematic area focus detailed field assessment deepen understanding analysis assessment conducted pre mission period therefore build information gathered following thematic area nn political social economic context background nn cause dynamic consequence armed conflict nn identification specific group potential partner others involved discussion process nn distribution availability proliferation weapon primarily small arm light weapon nn institutional capacity national stakeholder area related ddr nn survey socio economic condition local capacity absorb ex combatant dependant nn precondition factor influence ddr nn baseline data performance indicator programme design implementation monitoring evaluation nn also see annex b iddrs 310 integrated ddr planning process structure n expertise next step identify ddr expertise required assessment team composed specialist aspect ddr see iddrs level 5 information different need met ddr mission ensure coherence political process overall objective peacekeeping mandate assessment led member un ddr unit n local participation political situation allows national local participation assessment emphasized ensure local analysis situation need appropriate solution reflected included ddr pro gramme need however aware local bias especially tense immediate post conflict environment n building confidence managing expectation possible detailed field assessment linked preparatory assistance project initiative eg community development programme quick impact project build confidence support ddr programme care must taken however raise unrealistic expec tations ddr programme n design field assessment starting assessment ddr practitioner nn identify research objective indicator assessing nn identify source method data collection going obtain information nn develop appropriate analytical tool technique going make sense data nn develop method interpreting finding practical way going apply result n flexible thinking answering question essential developing well designed approach work plan allows systematic well structured data collection process naturally approach change data collection begin field way reduce importance initial guiding blueprint", "ProcessedSent": "therefore build information gathered following thematic area nn political social economic context background nn cause dynamic consequence armed conflict nn identification specific group potential partner others involved discussion process nn distribution availability proliferation weapon primarily small arm light weapon nn institutional capacity national stakeholder area related ddr nn survey socio economic condition local capacity absorb ex combatant dependant nn precondition factor influence ddr nn baseline data performance indicator programme design implementation monitoring evaluation", "SentID": 2577 }, { "ParagraphID": 837, - "Paragraph": "The following should be considered when planning a detailed field assessment for DDR: \\n Scope: From the start of DDR, practitioners should determine the geographical area that will be covered by the programme, how long the programme will last, and the level of detail and accuracy needed for its smooth running and financing. The scope and depth of this detailed field assessment will depend on the amount of information gathered in previous assessments, such as the technical assessment mission. The current political and military situation in the country concerned and the amount of access possible to areas where combatants are located should also be carefully considered; \\n Thematic areas of focus: The detailed field assessment should deepen understanding, analysis and assessments conducted in the pre\u00admission period. It therefore builds on information gathered on the following thematic areas: \\n\\n political, social and economic context and background; \\n\\n causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \\n\\n identification of specific groups, potential partners and others involved in the discussion process; \\n\\n distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \\n\\n institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \\n\\n survey of socio\u00adeconomic conditions and local capacities to absorb ex\u00adcombatants and their dependants; \\n\\n preconditions and other factors that will influence DDR; \\n\\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \\n\\n (Also see Annex B of IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures.); \\n Expertise: The next step is to identify the DDR expertise required. Assessment teams should be composed of specialists in all aspects of DDR (see IDDRS Level 5 for more information on the different needs that have to be met during a DDR mission). To ensure coherence with the political process and overall objectives of the peacekeeping mandate, the assessment should be led by a member of the UN DDR unit; \\n Local participation: Where the political situation allows, national and local participation in the assessment should be emphasized to ensure that local analyses of the situation, the needs and appropriate solutions are reflected and included in the DDR pro\u00ad gramme. There is a need, however, to be aware of local bias, especially in the tense immediate post\u00adconflict environment; \\n Building confidence and managing expectations: Where possible, detailed field assessments should be linked with preparatory assistance projects and initiatives (e.g., community development programmes and quick\u00adimpact projects) to build confidence in and support for the DDR programme. Care must be taken, however, not to raise unrealistic expec\u00ad tations of the DDR programme; \\n Design of the field assessment: Before starting the assessment, DDR practitioners should: \\n\\n identify the research objectives and indicators (what are we assessing?); \\n\\n identify the sources and methods for data collection (where are we going to obtain our information?); \\n\\n develop appropriate analytical tools and techniques (how are we going to make sense of our data?); \\n\\n develop a method for interpreting the findings in a practical way (how are we going to apply the results?); \\n Being flexible: Thinking about and answering these questions are essential to developing a well\u00addesigned approach and work plan that allows for a systematic and well\u00adstructured data collection process. Naturally, the approach will change once data collection begins in the field, but this should not in any way reduce its importance as an initial guiding blueprint.", + "Paragraph": "The following should be considered when planning a detailed field assessment for DDR: \n Scope: From the start of DDR, practitioners should determine the geographical area that will be covered by the programme, how long the programme will last, and the level of detail and accuracy needed for its smooth running and financing. The scope and depth of this detailed field assessment will depend on the amount of information gathered in previous assessments, such as the technical assessment mission. The current political and military situation in the country concerned and the amount of access possible to areas where combatants are located should also be carefully considered; \n Thematic areas of focus: The detailed field assessment should deepen understanding, analysis and assessments conducted in the pre\u00admission period. It therefore builds on information gathered on the following thematic areas: \n\n political, social and economic context and background; \n\n causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \n\n identification of specific groups, potential partners and others involved in the discussion process; \n\n distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \n\n institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \n\n survey of socio\u00adeconomic conditions and local capacities to absorb ex\u00adcombatants and their dependants; \n\n preconditions and other factors that will influence DDR; \n\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \n\n (Also see Annex B of IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures.); \n Expertise: The next step is to identify the DDR expertise required. Assessment teams should be composed of specialists in all aspects of DDR (see IDDRS Level 5 for more information on the different needs that have to be met during a DDR mission). To ensure coherence with the political process and overall objectives of the peacekeeping mandate, the assessment should be led by a member of the UN DDR unit; \n Local participation: Where the political situation allows, national and local participation in the assessment should be emphasized to ensure that local analyses of the situation, the needs and appropriate solutions are reflected and included in the DDR pro\u00ad gramme. There is a need, however, to be aware of local bias, especially in the tense immediate post\u00adconflict environment; \n Building confidence and managing expectations: Where possible, detailed field assessments should be linked with preparatory assistance projects and initiatives (e.g., community development programmes and quick\u00adimpact projects) to build confidence in and support for the DDR programme. Care must be taken, however, not to raise unrealistic expec\u00ad tations of the DDR programme; \n Design of the field assessment: Before starting the assessment, DDR practitioners should: \n\n identify the research objectives and indicators (what are we assessing?); \n\n identify the sources and methods for data collection (where are we going to obtain our information?); \n\n develop appropriate analytical tools and techniques (how are we going to make sense of our data?); \n\n develop a method for interpreting the findings in a practical way (how are we going to apply the results?); \n Being flexible: Thinking about and answering these questions are essential to developing a well\u00addesigned approach and work plan that allows for a systematic and well\u00adstructured data collection process. Naturally, the approach will change once data collection begins in the field, but this should not in any way reduce its importance as an initial guiding blueprint.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -46416,14 +46416,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Planning for an assessment", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n (Also see Annex B of IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures.", + "Sentence": "\n\n (Also see Annex B of IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures.", "newParagraph": "following considered planning detailed field assessment ddr n scope start ddr practitioner determine geographical area covered programme long programme last level detail accuracy needed smooth running financing scope depth detailed field assessment depend amount information gathered previous assessment technical assessment mission current political military situation country concerned amount access possible area combatant located also carefully considered n thematic area focus detailed field assessment deepen understanding analysis assessment conducted pre mission period therefore build information gathered following thematic area nn political social economic context background nn cause dynamic consequence armed conflict nn identification specific group potential partner others involved discussion process nn distribution availability proliferation weapon primarily small arm light weapon nn institutional capacity national stakeholder area related ddr nn survey socio economic condition local capacity absorb ex combatant dependant nn precondition factor influence ddr nn baseline data performance indicator programme design implementation monitoring evaluation nn also see annex b iddrs 310 integrated ddr planning process structure n expertise next step identify ddr expertise required assessment team composed specialist aspect ddr see iddrs level 5 information different need met ddr mission ensure coherence political process overall objective peacekeeping mandate assessment led member un ddr unit n local participation political situation allows national local participation assessment emphasized ensure local analysis situation need appropriate solution reflected included ddr pro gramme need however aware local bias especially tense immediate post conflict environment n building confidence managing expectation possible detailed field assessment linked preparatory assistance project initiative eg community development programme quick impact project build confidence support ddr programme care must taken however raise unrealistic expec tations ddr programme n design field assessment starting assessment ddr practitioner nn identify research objective indicator assessing nn identify source method data collection going obtain information nn develop appropriate analytical tool technique going make sense data nn develop method interpreting finding practical way going apply result n flexible thinking answering question essential developing well designed approach work plan allows systematic well structured data collection process naturally approach change data collection begin field way reduce importance initial guiding blueprint", "ProcessedSent": "nn also see annex b iddrs 310 integrated ddr planning process structure", "SentID": 2578 }, { "ParagraphID": 837, - "Paragraph": "The following should be considered when planning a detailed field assessment for DDR: \\n Scope: From the start of DDR, practitioners should determine the geographical area that will be covered by the programme, how long the programme will last, and the level of detail and accuracy needed for its smooth running and financing. The scope and depth of this detailed field assessment will depend on the amount of information gathered in previous assessments, such as the technical assessment mission. The current political and military situation in the country concerned and the amount of access possible to areas where combatants are located should also be carefully considered; \\n Thematic areas of focus: The detailed field assessment should deepen understanding, analysis and assessments conducted in the pre\u00admission period. It therefore builds on information gathered on the following thematic areas: \\n\\n political, social and economic context and background; \\n\\n causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \\n\\n identification of specific groups, potential partners and others involved in the discussion process; \\n\\n distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \\n\\n institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \\n\\n survey of socio\u00adeconomic conditions and local capacities to absorb ex\u00adcombatants and their dependants; \\n\\n preconditions and other factors that will influence DDR; \\n\\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \\n\\n (Also see Annex B of IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures.); \\n Expertise: The next step is to identify the DDR expertise required. Assessment teams should be composed of specialists in all aspects of DDR (see IDDRS Level 5 for more information on the different needs that have to be met during a DDR mission). To ensure coherence with the political process and overall objectives of the peacekeeping mandate, the assessment should be led by a member of the UN DDR unit; \\n Local participation: Where the political situation allows, national and local participation in the assessment should be emphasized to ensure that local analyses of the situation, the needs and appropriate solutions are reflected and included in the DDR pro\u00ad gramme. There is a need, however, to be aware of local bias, especially in the tense immediate post\u00adconflict environment; \\n Building confidence and managing expectations: Where possible, detailed field assessments should be linked with preparatory assistance projects and initiatives (e.g., community development programmes and quick\u00adimpact projects) to build confidence in and support for the DDR programme. Care must be taken, however, not to raise unrealistic expec\u00ad tations of the DDR programme; \\n Design of the field assessment: Before starting the assessment, DDR practitioners should: \\n\\n identify the research objectives and indicators (what are we assessing?); \\n\\n identify the sources and methods for data collection (where are we going to obtain our information?); \\n\\n develop appropriate analytical tools and techniques (how are we going to make sense of our data?); \\n\\n develop a method for interpreting the findings in a practical way (how are we going to apply the results?); \\n Being flexible: Thinking about and answering these questions are essential to developing a well\u00addesigned approach and work plan that allows for a systematic and well\u00adstructured data collection process. Naturally, the approach will change once data collection begins in the field, but this should not in any way reduce its importance as an initial guiding blueprint.", + "Paragraph": "The following should be considered when planning a detailed field assessment for DDR: \n Scope: From the start of DDR, practitioners should determine the geographical area that will be covered by the programme, how long the programme will last, and the level of detail and accuracy needed for its smooth running and financing. The scope and depth of this detailed field assessment will depend on the amount of information gathered in previous assessments, such as the technical assessment mission. The current political and military situation in the country concerned and the amount of access possible to areas where combatants are located should also be carefully considered; \n Thematic areas of focus: The detailed field assessment should deepen understanding, analysis and assessments conducted in the pre\u00admission period. It therefore builds on information gathered on the following thematic areas: \n\n political, social and economic context and background; \n\n causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \n\n identification of specific groups, potential partners and others involved in the discussion process; \n\n distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \n\n institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \n\n survey of socio\u00adeconomic conditions and local capacities to absorb ex\u00adcombatants and their dependants; \n\n preconditions and other factors that will influence DDR; \n\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \n\n (Also see Annex B of IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures.); \n Expertise: The next step is to identify the DDR expertise required. Assessment teams should be composed of specialists in all aspects of DDR (see IDDRS Level 5 for more information on the different needs that have to be met during a DDR mission). To ensure coherence with the political process and overall objectives of the peacekeeping mandate, the assessment should be led by a member of the UN DDR unit; \n Local participation: Where the political situation allows, national and local participation in the assessment should be emphasized to ensure that local analyses of the situation, the needs and appropriate solutions are reflected and included in the DDR pro\u00ad gramme. There is a need, however, to be aware of local bias, especially in the tense immediate post\u00adconflict environment; \n Building confidence and managing expectations: Where possible, detailed field assessments should be linked with preparatory assistance projects and initiatives (e.g., community development programmes and quick\u00adimpact projects) to build confidence in and support for the DDR programme. Care must be taken, however, not to raise unrealistic expec\u00ad tations of the DDR programme; \n Design of the field assessment: Before starting the assessment, DDR practitioners should: \n\n identify the research objectives and indicators (what are we assessing?); \n\n identify the sources and methods for data collection (where are we going to obtain our information?); \n\n develop appropriate analytical tools and techniques (how are we going to make sense of our data?); \n\n develop a method for interpreting the findings in a practical way (how are we going to apply the results?); \n Being flexible: Thinking about and answering these questions are essential to developing a well\u00addesigned approach and work plan that allows for a systematic and well\u00adstructured data collection process. Naturally, the approach will change once data collection begins in the field, but this should not in any way reduce its importance as an initial guiding blueprint.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -46434,14 +46434,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Planning for an assessment", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "); \\n Expertise: The next step is to identify the DDR expertise required.", + "Sentence": "); \n Expertise: The next step is to identify the DDR expertise required.", "newParagraph": "following considered planning detailed field assessment ddr n scope start ddr practitioner determine geographical area covered programme long programme last level detail accuracy needed smooth running financing scope depth detailed field assessment depend amount information gathered previous assessment technical assessment mission current political military situation country concerned amount access possible area combatant located also carefully considered n thematic area focus detailed field assessment deepen understanding analysis assessment conducted pre mission period therefore build information gathered following thematic area nn political social economic context background nn cause dynamic consequence armed conflict nn identification specific group potential partner others involved discussion process nn distribution availability proliferation weapon primarily small arm light weapon nn institutional capacity national stakeholder area related ddr nn survey socio economic condition local capacity absorb ex combatant dependant nn precondition factor influence ddr nn baseline data performance indicator programme design implementation monitoring evaluation nn also see annex b iddrs 310 integrated ddr planning process structure n expertise next step identify ddr expertise required assessment team composed specialist aspect ddr see iddrs level 5 information different need met ddr mission ensure coherence political process overall objective peacekeeping mandate assessment led member un ddr unit n local participation political situation allows national local participation assessment emphasized ensure local analysis situation need appropriate solution reflected included ddr pro gramme need however aware local bias especially tense immediate post conflict environment n building confidence managing expectation possible detailed field assessment linked preparatory assistance project initiative eg community development programme quick impact project build confidence support ddr programme care must taken however raise unrealistic expec tations ddr programme n design field assessment starting assessment ddr practitioner nn identify research objective indicator assessing nn identify source method data collection going obtain information nn develop appropriate analytical tool technique going make sense data nn develop method interpreting finding practical way going apply result n flexible thinking answering question essential developing well designed approach work plan allows systematic well structured data collection process naturally approach change data collection begin field way reduce importance initial guiding blueprint", "ProcessedSent": " n expertise next step identify ddr expertise required", "SentID": 2579 }, { "ParagraphID": 837, - "Paragraph": "The following should be considered when planning a detailed field assessment for DDR: \\n Scope: From the start of DDR, practitioners should determine the geographical area that will be covered by the programme, how long the programme will last, and the level of detail and accuracy needed for its smooth running and financing. The scope and depth of this detailed field assessment will depend on the amount of information gathered in previous assessments, such as the technical assessment mission. The current political and military situation in the country concerned and the amount of access possible to areas where combatants are located should also be carefully considered; \\n Thematic areas of focus: The detailed field assessment should deepen understanding, analysis and assessments conducted in the pre\u00admission period. It therefore builds on information gathered on the following thematic areas: \\n\\n political, social and economic context and background; \\n\\n causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \\n\\n identification of specific groups, potential partners and others involved in the discussion process; \\n\\n distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \\n\\n institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \\n\\n survey of socio\u00adeconomic conditions and local capacities to absorb ex\u00adcombatants and their dependants; \\n\\n preconditions and other factors that will influence DDR; \\n\\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \\n\\n (Also see Annex B of IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures.); \\n Expertise: The next step is to identify the DDR expertise required. Assessment teams should be composed of specialists in all aspects of DDR (see IDDRS Level 5 for more information on the different needs that have to be met during a DDR mission). To ensure coherence with the political process and overall objectives of the peacekeeping mandate, the assessment should be led by a member of the UN DDR unit; \\n Local participation: Where the political situation allows, national and local participation in the assessment should be emphasized to ensure that local analyses of the situation, the needs and appropriate solutions are reflected and included in the DDR pro\u00ad gramme. There is a need, however, to be aware of local bias, especially in the tense immediate post\u00adconflict environment; \\n Building confidence and managing expectations: Where possible, detailed field assessments should be linked with preparatory assistance projects and initiatives (e.g., community development programmes and quick\u00adimpact projects) to build confidence in and support for the DDR programme. Care must be taken, however, not to raise unrealistic expec\u00ad tations of the DDR programme; \\n Design of the field assessment: Before starting the assessment, DDR practitioners should: \\n\\n identify the research objectives and indicators (what are we assessing?); \\n\\n identify the sources and methods for data collection (where are we going to obtain our information?); \\n\\n develop appropriate analytical tools and techniques (how are we going to make sense of our data?); \\n\\n develop a method for interpreting the findings in a practical way (how are we going to apply the results?); \\n Being flexible: Thinking about and answering these questions are essential to developing a well\u00addesigned approach and work plan that allows for a systematic and well\u00adstructured data collection process. Naturally, the approach will change once data collection begins in the field, but this should not in any way reduce its importance as an initial guiding blueprint.", + "Paragraph": "The following should be considered when planning a detailed field assessment for DDR: \n Scope: From the start of DDR, practitioners should determine the geographical area that will be covered by the programme, how long the programme will last, and the level of detail and accuracy needed for its smooth running and financing. The scope and depth of this detailed field assessment will depend on the amount of information gathered in previous assessments, such as the technical assessment mission. The current political and military situation in the country concerned and the amount of access possible to areas where combatants are located should also be carefully considered; \n Thematic areas of focus: The detailed field assessment should deepen understanding, analysis and assessments conducted in the pre\u00admission period. It therefore builds on information gathered on the following thematic areas: \n\n political, social and economic context and background; \n\n causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \n\n identification of specific groups, potential partners and others involved in the discussion process; \n\n distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \n\n institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \n\n survey of socio\u00adeconomic conditions and local capacities to absorb ex\u00adcombatants and their dependants; \n\n preconditions and other factors that will influence DDR; \n\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \n\n (Also see Annex B of IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures.); \n Expertise: The next step is to identify the DDR expertise required. Assessment teams should be composed of specialists in all aspects of DDR (see IDDRS Level 5 for more information on the different needs that have to be met during a DDR mission). To ensure coherence with the political process and overall objectives of the peacekeeping mandate, the assessment should be led by a member of the UN DDR unit; \n Local participation: Where the political situation allows, national and local participation in the assessment should be emphasized to ensure that local analyses of the situation, the needs and appropriate solutions are reflected and included in the DDR pro\u00ad gramme. There is a need, however, to be aware of local bias, especially in the tense immediate post\u00adconflict environment; \n Building confidence and managing expectations: Where possible, detailed field assessments should be linked with preparatory assistance projects and initiatives (e.g., community development programmes and quick\u00adimpact projects) to build confidence in and support for the DDR programme. Care must be taken, however, not to raise unrealistic expec\u00ad tations of the DDR programme; \n Design of the field assessment: Before starting the assessment, DDR practitioners should: \n\n identify the research objectives and indicators (what are we assessing?); \n\n identify the sources and methods for data collection (where are we going to obtain our information?); \n\n develop appropriate analytical tools and techniques (how are we going to make sense of our data?); \n\n develop a method for interpreting the findings in a practical way (how are we going to apply the results?); \n Being flexible: Thinking about and answering these questions are essential to developing a well\u00addesigned approach and work plan that allows for a systematic and well\u00adstructured data collection process. Naturally, the approach will change once data collection begins in the field, but this should not in any way reduce its importance as an initial guiding blueprint.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -46459,7 +46459,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 837, - "Paragraph": "The following should be considered when planning a detailed field assessment for DDR: \\n Scope: From the start of DDR, practitioners should determine the geographical area that will be covered by the programme, how long the programme will last, and the level of detail and accuracy needed for its smooth running and financing. The scope and depth of this detailed field assessment will depend on the amount of information gathered in previous assessments, such as the technical assessment mission. The current political and military situation in the country concerned and the amount of access possible to areas where combatants are located should also be carefully considered; \\n Thematic areas of focus: The detailed field assessment should deepen understanding, analysis and assessments conducted in the pre\u00admission period. It therefore builds on information gathered on the following thematic areas: \\n\\n political, social and economic context and background; \\n\\n causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \\n\\n identification of specific groups, potential partners and others involved in the discussion process; \\n\\n distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \\n\\n institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \\n\\n survey of socio\u00adeconomic conditions and local capacities to absorb ex\u00adcombatants and their dependants; \\n\\n preconditions and other factors that will influence DDR; \\n\\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \\n\\n (Also see Annex B of IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures.); \\n Expertise: The next step is to identify the DDR expertise required. Assessment teams should be composed of specialists in all aspects of DDR (see IDDRS Level 5 for more information on the different needs that have to be met during a DDR mission). To ensure coherence with the political process and overall objectives of the peacekeeping mandate, the assessment should be led by a member of the UN DDR unit; \\n Local participation: Where the political situation allows, national and local participation in the assessment should be emphasized to ensure that local analyses of the situation, the needs and appropriate solutions are reflected and included in the DDR pro\u00ad gramme. There is a need, however, to be aware of local bias, especially in the tense immediate post\u00adconflict environment; \\n Building confidence and managing expectations: Where possible, detailed field assessments should be linked with preparatory assistance projects and initiatives (e.g., community development programmes and quick\u00adimpact projects) to build confidence in and support for the DDR programme. Care must be taken, however, not to raise unrealistic expec\u00ad tations of the DDR programme; \\n Design of the field assessment: Before starting the assessment, DDR practitioners should: \\n\\n identify the research objectives and indicators (what are we assessing?); \\n\\n identify the sources and methods for data collection (where are we going to obtain our information?); \\n\\n develop appropriate analytical tools and techniques (how are we going to make sense of our data?); \\n\\n develop a method for interpreting the findings in a practical way (how are we going to apply the results?); \\n Being flexible: Thinking about and answering these questions are essential to developing a well\u00addesigned approach and work plan that allows for a systematic and well\u00adstructured data collection process. Naturally, the approach will change once data collection begins in the field, but this should not in any way reduce its importance as an initial guiding blueprint.", + "Paragraph": "The following should be considered when planning a detailed field assessment for DDR: \n Scope: From the start of DDR, practitioners should determine the geographical area that will be covered by the programme, how long the programme will last, and the level of detail and accuracy needed for its smooth running and financing. The scope and depth of this detailed field assessment will depend on the amount of information gathered in previous assessments, such as the technical assessment mission. The current political and military situation in the country concerned and the amount of access possible to areas where combatants are located should also be carefully considered; \n Thematic areas of focus: The detailed field assessment should deepen understanding, analysis and assessments conducted in the pre\u00admission period. It therefore builds on information gathered on the following thematic areas: \n\n political, social and economic context and background; \n\n causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \n\n identification of specific groups, potential partners and others involved in the discussion process; \n\n distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \n\n institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \n\n survey of socio\u00adeconomic conditions and local capacities to absorb ex\u00adcombatants and their dependants; \n\n preconditions and other factors that will influence DDR; \n\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \n\n (Also see Annex B of IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures.); \n Expertise: The next step is to identify the DDR expertise required. Assessment teams should be composed of specialists in all aspects of DDR (see IDDRS Level 5 for more information on the different needs that have to be met during a DDR mission). To ensure coherence with the political process and overall objectives of the peacekeeping mandate, the assessment should be led by a member of the UN DDR unit; \n Local participation: Where the political situation allows, national and local participation in the assessment should be emphasized to ensure that local analyses of the situation, the needs and appropriate solutions are reflected and included in the DDR pro\u00ad gramme. There is a need, however, to be aware of local bias, especially in the tense immediate post\u00adconflict environment; \n Building confidence and managing expectations: Where possible, detailed field assessments should be linked with preparatory assistance projects and initiatives (e.g., community development programmes and quick\u00adimpact projects) to build confidence in and support for the DDR programme. Care must be taken, however, not to raise unrealistic expec\u00ad tations of the DDR programme; \n Design of the field assessment: Before starting the assessment, DDR practitioners should: \n\n identify the research objectives and indicators (what are we assessing?); \n\n identify the sources and methods for data collection (where are we going to obtain our information?); \n\n develop appropriate analytical tools and techniques (how are we going to make sense of our data?); \n\n develop a method for interpreting the findings in a practical way (how are we going to apply the results?); \n Being flexible: Thinking about and answering these questions are essential to developing a well\u00addesigned approach and work plan that allows for a systematic and well\u00adstructured data collection process. Naturally, the approach will change once data collection begins in the field, but this should not in any way reduce its importance as an initial guiding blueprint.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -46470,14 +46470,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Planning for an assessment", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "To ensure coherence with the political process and overall objectives of the peacekeeping mandate, the assessment should be led by a member of the UN DDR unit; \\n Local participation: Where the political situation allows, national and local participation in the assessment should be emphasized to ensure that local analyses of the situation, the needs and appropriate solutions are reflected and included in the DDR pro\u00ad gramme.", + "Sentence": "To ensure coherence with the political process and overall objectives of the peacekeeping mandate, the assessment should be led by a member of the UN DDR unit; \n Local participation: Where the political situation allows, national and local participation in the assessment should be emphasized to ensure that local analyses of the situation, the needs and appropriate solutions are reflected and included in the DDR pro\u00ad gramme.", "newParagraph": "following considered planning detailed field assessment ddr n scope start ddr practitioner determine geographical area covered programme long programme last level detail accuracy needed smooth running financing scope depth detailed field assessment depend amount information gathered previous assessment technical assessment mission current political military situation country concerned amount access possible area combatant located also carefully considered n thematic area focus detailed field assessment deepen understanding analysis assessment conducted pre mission period therefore build information gathered following thematic area nn political social economic context background nn cause dynamic consequence armed conflict nn identification specific group potential partner others involved discussion process nn distribution availability proliferation weapon primarily small arm light weapon nn institutional capacity national stakeholder area related ddr nn survey socio economic condition local capacity absorb ex combatant dependant nn precondition factor influence ddr nn baseline data performance indicator programme design implementation monitoring evaluation nn also see annex b iddrs 310 integrated ddr planning process structure n expertise next step identify ddr expertise required assessment team composed specialist aspect ddr see iddrs level 5 information different need met ddr mission ensure coherence political process overall objective peacekeeping mandate assessment led member un ddr unit n local participation political situation allows national local participation assessment emphasized ensure local analysis situation need appropriate solution reflected included ddr pro gramme need however aware local bias especially tense immediate post conflict environment n building confidence managing expectation possible detailed field assessment linked preparatory assistance project initiative eg community development programme quick impact project build confidence support ddr programme care must taken however raise unrealistic expec tations ddr programme n design field assessment starting assessment ddr practitioner nn identify research objective indicator assessing nn identify source method data collection going obtain information nn develop appropriate analytical tool technique going make sense data nn develop method interpreting finding practical way going apply result n flexible thinking answering question essential developing well designed approach work plan allows systematic well structured data collection process naturally approach change data collection begin field way reduce importance initial guiding blueprint", "ProcessedSent": "ensure coherence political process overall objective peacekeeping mandate assessment led member un ddr unit n local participation political situation allows national local participation assessment emphasized ensure local analysis situation need appropriate solution reflected included ddr pro gramme", "SentID": 2581 }, { "ParagraphID": 837, - "Paragraph": "The following should be considered when planning a detailed field assessment for DDR: \\n Scope: From the start of DDR, practitioners should determine the geographical area that will be covered by the programme, how long the programme will last, and the level of detail and accuracy needed for its smooth running and financing. The scope and depth of this detailed field assessment will depend on the amount of information gathered in previous assessments, such as the technical assessment mission. The current political and military situation in the country concerned and the amount of access possible to areas where combatants are located should also be carefully considered; \\n Thematic areas of focus: The detailed field assessment should deepen understanding, analysis and assessments conducted in the pre\u00admission period. It therefore builds on information gathered on the following thematic areas: \\n\\n political, social and economic context and background; \\n\\n causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \\n\\n identification of specific groups, potential partners and others involved in the discussion process; \\n\\n distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \\n\\n institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \\n\\n survey of socio\u00adeconomic conditions and local capacities to absorb ex\u00adcombatants and their dependants; \\n\\n preconditions and other factors that will influence DDR; \\n\\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \\n\\n (Also see Annex B of IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures.); \\n Expertise: The next step is to identify the DDR expertise required. Assessment teams should be composed of specialists in all aspects of DDR (see IDDRS Level 5 for more information on the different needs that have to be met during a DDR mission). To ensure coherence with the political process and overall objectives of the peacekeeping mandate, the assessment should be led by a member of the UN DDR unit; \\n Local participation: Where the political situation allows, national and local participation in the assessment should be emphasized to ensure that local analyses of the situation, the needs and appropriate solutions are reflected and included in the DDR pro\u00ad gramme. There is a need, however, to be aware of local bias, especially in the tense immediate post\u00adconflict environment; \\n Building confidence and managing expectations: Where possible, detailed field assessments should be linked with preparatory assistance projects and initiatives (e.g., community development programmes and quick\u00adimpact projects) to build confidence in and support for the DDR programme. Care must be taken, however, not to raise unrealistic expec\u00ad tations of the DDR programme; \\n Design of the field assessment: Before starting the assessment, DDR practitioners should: \\n\\n identify the research objectives and indicators (what are we assessing?); \\n\\n identify the sources and methods for data collection (where are we going to obtain our information?); \\n\\n develop appropriate analytical tools and techniques (how are we going to make sense of our data?); \\n\\n develop a method for interpreting the findings in a practical way (how are we going to apply the results?); \\n Being flexible: Thinking about and answering these questions are essential to developing a well\u00addesigned approach and work plan that allows for a systematic and well\u00adstructured data collection process. Naturally, the approach will change once data collection begins in the field, but this should not in any way reduce its importance as an initial guiding blueprint.", + "Paragraph": "The following should be considered when planning a detailed field assessment for DDR: \n Scope: From the start of DDR, practitioners should determine the geographical area that will be covered by the programme, how long the programme will last, and the level of detail and accuracy needed for its smooth running and financing. The scope and depth of this detailed field assessment will depend on the amount of information gathered in previous assessments, such as the technical assessment mission. The current political and military situation in the country concerned and the amount of access possible to areas where combatants are located should also be carefully considered; \n Thematic areas of focus: The detailed field assessment should deepen understanding, analysis and assessments conducted in the pre\u00admission period. It therefore builds on information gathered on the following thematic areas: \n\n political, social and economic context and background; \n\n causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \n\n identification of specific groups, potential partners and others involved in the discussion process; \n\n distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \n\n institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \n\n survey of socio\u00adeconomic conditions and local capacities to absorb ex\u00adcombatants and their dependants; \n\n preconditions and other factors that will influence DDR; \n\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \n\n (Also see Annex B of IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures.); \n Expertise: The next step is to identify the DDR expertise required. Assessment teams should be composed of specialists in all aspects of DDR (see IDDRS Level 5 for more information on the different needs that have to be met during a DDR mission). To ensure coherence with the political process and overall objectives of the peacekeeping mandate, the assessment should be led by a member of the UN DDR unit; \n Local participation: Where the political situation allows, national and local participation in the assessment should be emphasized to ensure that local analyses of the situation, the needs and appropriate solutions are reflected and included in the DDR pro\u00ad gramme. There is a need, however, to be aware of local bias, especially in the tense immediate post\u00adconflict environment; \n Building confidence and managing expectations: Where possible, detailed field assessments should be linked with preparatory assistance projects and initiatives (e.g., community development programmes and quick\u00adimpact projects) to build confidence in and support for the DDR programme. Care must be taken, however, not to raise unrealistic expec\u00ad tations of the DDR programme; \n Design of the field assessment: Before starting the assessment, DDR practitioners should: \n\n identify the research objectives and indicators (what are we assessing?); \n\n identify the sources and methods for data collection (where are we going to obtain our information?); \n\n develop appropriate analytical tools and techniques (how are we going to make sense of our data?); \n\n develop a method for interpreting the findings in a practical way (how are we going to apply the results?); \n Being flexible: Thinking about and answering these questions are essential to developing a well\u00addesigned approach and work plan that allows for a systematic and well\u00adstructured data collection process. Naturally, the approach will change once data collection begins in the field, but this should not in any way reduce its importance as an initial guiding blueprint.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -46488,14 +46488,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Planning for an assessment", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "There is a need, however, to be aware of local bias, especially in the tense immediate post\u00adconflict environment; \\n Building confidence and managing expectations: Where possible, detailed field assessments should be linked with preparatory assistance projects and initiatives (e.g., community development programmes and quick\u00adimpact projects) to build confidence in and support for the DDR programme.", + "Sentence": "There is a need, however, to be aware of local bias, especially in the tense immediate post\u00adconflict environment; \n Building confidence and managing expectations: Where possible, detailed field assessments should be linked with preparatory assistance projects and initiatives (e.g., community development programmes and quick\u00adimpact projects) to build confidence in and support for the DDR programme.", "newParagraph": "following considered planning detailed field assessment ddr n scope start ddr practitioner determine geographical area covered programme long programme last level detail accuracy needed smooth running financing scope depth detailed field assessment depend amount information gathered previous assessment technical assessment mission current political military situation country concerned amount access possible area combatant located also carefully considered n thematic area focus detailed field assessment deepen understanding analysis assessment conducted pre mission period therefore build information gathered following thematic area nn political social economic context background nn cause dynamic consequence armed conflict nn identification specific group potential partner others involved discussion process nn distribution availability proliferation weapon primarily small arm light weapon nn institutional capacity national stakeholder area related ddr nn survey socio economic condition local capacity absorb ex combatant dependant nn precondition factor influence ddr nn baseline data performance indicator programme design implementation monitoring evaluation nn also see annex b iddrs 310 integrated ddr planning process structure n expertise next step identify ddr expertise required assessment team composed specialist aspect ddr see iddrs level 5 information different need met ddr mission ensure coherence political process overall objective peacekeeping mandate assessment led member un ddr unit n local participation political situation allows national local participation assessment emphasized ensure local analysis situation need appropriate solution reflected included ddr pro gramme need however aware local bias especially tense immediate post conflict environment n building confidence managing expectation possible detailed field assessment linked preparatory assistance project initiative eg community development programme quick impact project build confidence support ddr programme care must taken however raise unrealistic expec tations ddr programme n design field assessment starting assessment ddr practitioner nn identify research objective indicator assessing nn identify source method data collection going obtain information nn develop appropriate analytical tool technique going make sense data nn develop method interpreting finding practical way going apply result n flexible thinking answering question essential developing well designed approach work plan allows systematic well structured data collection process naturally approach change data collection begin field way reduce importance initial guiding blueprint", "ProcessedSent": "need however aware local bias especially tense immediate post conflict environment n building confidence managing expectation possible detailed field assessment linked preparatory assistance project initiative eg community development programme quick impact project build confidence support ddr programme", "SentID": 2582 }, { "ParagraphID": 837, - "Paragraph": "The following should be considered when planning a detailed field assessment for DDR: \\n Scope: From the start of DDR, practitioners should determine the geographical area that will be covered by the programme, how long the programme will last, and the level of detail and accuracy needed for its smooth running and financing. The scope and depth of this detailed field assessment will depend on the amount of information gathered in previous assessments, such as the technical assessment mission. The current political and military situation in the country concerned and the amount of access possible to areas where combatants are located should also be carefully considered; \\n Thematic areas of focus: The detailed field assessment should deepen understanding, analysis and assessments conducted in the pre\u00admission period. It therefore builds on information gathered on the following thematic areas: \\n\\n political, social and economic context and background; \\n\\n causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \\n\\n identification of specific groups, potential partners and others involved in the discussion process; \\n\\n distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \\n\\n institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \\n\\n survey of socio\u00adeconomic conditions and local capacities to absorb ex\u00adcombatants and their dependants; \\n\\n preconditions and other factors that will influence DDR; \\n\\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \\n\\n (Also see Annex B of IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures.); \\n Expertise: The next step is to identify the DDR expertise required. Assessment teams should be composed of specialists in all aspects of DDR (see IDDRS Level 5 for more information on the different needs that have to be met during a DDR mission). To ensure coherence with the political process and overall objectives of the peacekeeping mandate, the assessment should be led by a member of the UN DDR unit; \\n Local participation: Where the political situation allows, national and local participation in the assessment should be emphasized to ensure that local analyses of the situation, the needs and appropriate solutions are reflected and included in the DDR pro\u00ad gramme. There is a need, however, to be aware of local bias, especially in the tense immediate post\u00adconflict environment; \\n Building confidence and managing expectations: Where possible, detailed field assessments should be linked with preparatory assistance projects and initiatives (e.g., community development programmes and quick\u00adimpact projects) to build confidence in and support for the DDR programme. Care must be taken, however, not to raise unrealistic expec\u00ad tations of the DDR programme; \\n Design of the field assessment: Before starting the assessment, DDR practitioners should: \\n\\n identify the research objectives and indicators (what are we assessing?); \\n\\n identify the sources and methods for data collection (where are we going to obtain our information?); \\n\\n develop appropriate analytical tools and techniques (how are we going to make sense of our data?); \\n\\n develop a method for interpreting the findings in a practical way (how are we going to apply the results?); \\n Being flexible: Thinking about and answering these questions are essential to developing a well\u00addesigned approach and work plan that allows for a systematic and well\u00adstructured data collection process. Naturally, the approach will change once data collection begins in the field, but this should not in any way reduce its importance as an initial guiding blueprint.", + "Paragraph": "The following should be considered when planning a detailed field assessment for DDR: \n Scope: From the start of DDR, practitioners should determine the geographical area that will be covered by the programme, how long the programme will last, and the level of detail and accuracy needed for its smooth running and financing. The scope and depth of this detailed field assessment will depend on the amount of information gathered in previous assessments, such as the technical assessment mission. The current political and military situation in the country concerned and the amount of access possible to areas where combatants are located should also be carefully considered; \n Thematic areas of focus: The detailed field assessment should deepen understanding, analysis and assessments conducted in the pre\u00admission period. It therefore builds on information gathered on the following thematic areas: \n\n political, social and economic context and background; \n\n causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \n\n identification of specific groups, potential partners and others involved in the discussion process; \n\n distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \n\n institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \n\n survey of socio\u00adeconomic conditions and local capacities to absorb ex\u00adcombatants and their dependants; \n\n preconditions and other factors that will influence DDR; \n\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \n\n (Also see Annex B of IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures.); \n Expertise: The next step is to identify the DDR expertise required. Assessment teams should be composed of specialists in all aspects of DDR (see IDDRS Level 5 for more information on the different needs that have to be met during a DDR mission). To ensure coherence with the political process and overall objectives of the peacekeeping mandate, the assessment should be led by a member of the UN DDR unit; \n Local participation: Where the political situation allows, national and local participation in the assessment should be emphasized to ensure that local analyses of the situation, the needs and appropriate solutions are reflected and included in the DDR pro\u00ad gramme. There is a need, however, to be aware of local bias, especially in the tense immediate post\u00adconflict environment; \n Building confidence and managing expectations: Where possible, detailed field assessments should be linked with preparatory assistance projects and initiatives (e.g., community development programmes and quick\u00adimpact projects) to build confidence in and support for the DDR programme. Care must be taken, however, not to raise unrealistic expec\u00ad tations of the DDR programme; \n Design of the field assessment: Before starting the assessment, DDR practitioners should: \n\n identify the research objectives and indicators (what are we assessing?); \n\n identify the sources and methods for data collection (where are we going to obtain our information?); \n\n develop appropriate analytical tools and techniques (how are we going to make sense of our data?); \n\n develop a method for interpreting the findings in a practical way (how are we going to apply the results?); \n Being flexible: Thinking about and answering these questions are essential to developing a well\u00addesigned approach and work plan that allows for a systematic and well\u00adstructured data collection process. Naturally, the approach will change once data collection begins in the field, but this should not in any way reduce its importance as an initial guiding blueprint.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -46506,14 +46506,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Planning for an assessment", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Care must be taken, however, not to raise unrealistic expec\u00ad tations of the DDR programme; \\n Design of the field assessment: Before starting the assessment, DDR practitioners should: \\n\\n identify the research objectives and indicators (what are we assessing?", + "Sentence": "Care must be taken, however, not to raise unrealistic expec\u00ad tations of the DDR programme; \n Design of the field assessment: Before starting the assessment, DDR practitioners should: \n\n identify the research objectives and indicators (what are we assessing?", "newParagraph": "following considered planning detailed field assessment ddr n scope start ddr practitioner determine geographical area covered programme long programme last level detail accuracy needed smooth running financing scope depth detailed field assessment depend amount information gathered previous assessment technical assessment mission current political military situation country concerned amount access possible area combatant located also carefully considered n thematic area focus detailed field assessment deepen understanding analysis assessment conducted pre mission period therefore build information gathered following thematic area nn political social economic context background nn cause dynamic consequence armed conflict nn identification specific group potential partner others involved discussion process nn distribution availability proliferation weapon primarily small arm light weapon nn institutional capacity national stakeholder area related ddr nn survey socio economic condition local capacity absorb ex combatant dependant nn precondition factor influence ddr nn baseline data performance indicator programme design implementation monitoring evaluation nn also see annex b iddrs 310 integrated ddr planning process structure n expertise next step identify ddr expertise required assessment team composed specialist aspect ddr see iddrs level 5 information different need met ddr mission ensure coherence political process overall objective peacekeeping mandate assessment led member un ddr unit n local participation political situation allows national local participation assessment emphasized ensure local analysis situation need appropriate solution reflected included ddr pro gramme need however aware local bias especially tense immediate post conflict environment n building confidence managing expectation possible detailed field assessment linked preparatory assistance project initiative eg community development programme quick impact project build confidence support ddr programme care must taken however raise unrealistic expec tations ddr programme n design field assessment starting assessment ddr practitioner nn identify research objective indicator assessing nn identify source method data collection going obtain information nn develop appropriate analytical tool technique going make sense data nn develop method interpreting finding practical way going apply result n flexible thinking answering question essential developing well designed approach work plan allows systematic well structured data collection process naturally approach change data collection begin field way reduce importance initial guiding blueprint", "ProcessedSent": "care must taken however raise unrealistic expec tations ddr programme n design field assessment starting assessment ddr practitioner nn identify research objective indicator assessing", "SentID": 2583 }, { "ParagraphID": 837, - "Paragraph": "The following should be considered when planning a detailed field assessment for DDR: \\n Scope: From the start of DDR, practitioners should determine the geographical area that will be covered by the programme, how long the programme will last, and the level of detail and accuracy needed for its smooth running and financing. The scope and depth of this detailed field assessment will depend on the amount of information gathered in previous assessments, such as the technical assessment mission. The current political and military situation in the country concerned and the amount of access possible to areas where combatants are located should also be carefully considered; \\n Thematic areas of focus: The detailed field assessment should deepen understanding, analysis and assessments conducted in the pre\u00admission period. It therefore builds on information gathered on the following thematic areas: \\n\\n political, social and economic context and background; \\n\\n causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \\n\\n identification of specific groups, potential partners and others involved in the discussion process; \\n\\n distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \\n\\n institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \\n\\n survey of socio\u00adeconomic conditions and local capacities to absorb ex\u00adcombatants and their dependants; \\n\\n preconditions and other factors that will influence DDR; \\n\\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \\n\\n (Also see Annex B of IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures.); \\n Expertise: The next step is to identify the DDR expertise required. Assessment teams should be composed of specialists in all aspects of DDR (see IDDRS Level 5 for more information on the different needs that have to be met during a DDR mission). To ensure coherence with the political process and overall objectives of the peacekeeping mandate, the assessment should be led by a member of the UN DDR unit; \\n Local participation: Where the political situation allows, national and local participation in the assessment should be emphasized to ensure that local analyses of the situation, the needs and appropriate solutions are reflected and included in the DDR pro\u00ad gramme. There is a need, however, to be aware of local bias, especially in the tense immediate post\u00adconflict environment; \\n Building confidence and managing expectations: Where possible, detailed field assessments should be linked with preparatory assistance projects and initiatives (e.g., community development programmes and quick\u00adimpact projects) to build confidence in and support for the DDR programme. Care must be taken, however, not to raise unrealistic expec\u00ad tations of the DDR programme; \\n Design of the field assessment: Before starting the assessment, DDR practitioners should: \\n\\n identify the research objectives and indicators (what are we assessing?); \\n\\n identify the sources and methods for data collection (where are we going to obtain our information?); \\n\\n develop appropriate analytical tools and techniques (how are we going to make sense of our data?); \\n\\n develop a method for interpreting the findings in a practical way (how are we going to apply the results?); \\n Being flexible: Thinking about and answering these questions are essential to developing a well\u00addesigned approach and work plan that allows for a systematic and well\u00adstructured data collection process. Naturally, the approach will change once data collection begins in the field, but this should not in any way reduce its importance as an initial guiding blueprint.", + "Paragraph": "The following should be considered when planning a detailed field assessment for DDR: \n Scope: From the start of DDR, practitioners should determine the geographical area that will be covered by the programme, how long the programme will last, and the level of detail and accuracy needed for its smooth running and financing. The scope and depth of this detailed field assessment will depend on the amount of information gathered in previous assessments, such as the technical assessment mission. The current political and military situation in the country concerned and the amount of access possible to areas where combatants are located should also be carefully considered; \n Thematic areas of focus: The detailed field assessment should deepen understanding, analysis and assessments conducted in the pre\u00admission period. It therefore builds on information gathered on the following thematic areas: \n\n political, social and economic context and background; \n\n causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \n\n identification of specific groups, potential partners and others involved in the discussion process; \n\n distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \n\n institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \n\n survey of socio\u00adeconomic conditions and local capacities to absorb ex\u00adcombatants and their dependants; \n\n preconditions and other factors that will influence DDR; \n\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \n\n (Also see Annex B of IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures.); \n Expertise: The next step is to identify the DDR expertise required. Assessment teams should be composed of specialists in all aspects of DDR (see IDDRS Level 5 for more information on the different needs that have to be met during a DDR mission). To ensure coherence with the political process and overall objectives of the peacekeeping mandate, the assessment should be led by a member of the UN DDR unit; \n Local participation: Where the political situation allows, national and local participation in the assessment should be emphasized to ensure that local analyses of the situation, the needs and appropriate solutions are reflected and included in the DDR pro\u00ad gramme. There is a need, however, to be aware of local bias, especially in the tense immediate post\u00adconflict environment; \n Building confidence and managing expectations: Where possible, detailed field assessments should be linked with preparatory assistance projects and initiatives (e.g., community development programmes and quick\u00adimpact projects) to build confidence in and support for the DDR programme. Care must be taken, however, not to raise unrealistic expec\u00ad tations of the DDR programme; \n Design of the field assessment: Before starting the assessment, DDR practitioners should: \n\n identify the research objectives and indicators (what are we assessing?); \n\n identify the sources and methods for data collection (where are we going to obtain our information?); \n\n develop appropriate analytical tools and techniques (how are we going to make sense of our data?); \n\n develop a method for interpreting the findings in a practical way (how are we going to apply the results?); \n Being flexible: Thinking about and answering these questions are essential to developing a well\u00addesigned approach and work plan that allows for a systematic and well\u00adstructured data collection process. Naturally, the approach will change once data collection begins in the field, but this should not in any way reduce its importance as an initial guiding blueprint.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -46524,14 +46524,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Planning for an assessment", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "); \\n\\n identify the sources and methods for data collection (where are we going to obtain our information?", + "Sentence": "); \n\n identify the sources and methods for data collection (where are we going to obtain our information?", "newParagraph": "following considered planning detailed field assessment ddr n scope start ddr practitioner determine geographical area covered programme long programme last level detail accuracy needed smooth running financing scope depth detailed field assessment depend amount information gathered previous assessment technical assessment mission current political military situation country concerned amount access possible area combatant located also carefully considered n thematic area focus detailed field assessment deepen understanding analysis assessment conducted pre mission period therefore build information gathered following thematic area nn political social economic context background nn cause dynamic consequence armed conflict nn identification specific group potential partner others involved discussion process nn distribution availability proliferation weapon primarily small arm light weapon nn institutional capacity national stakeholder area related ddr nn survey socio economic condition local capacity absorb ex combatant dependant nn precondition factor influence ddr nn baseline data performance indicator programme design implementation monitoring evaluation nn also see annex b iddrs 310 integrated ddr planning process structure n expertise next step identify ddr expertise required assessment team composed specialist aspect ddr see iddrs level 5 information different need met ddr mission ensure coherence political process overall objective peacekeeping mandate assessment led member un ddr unit n local participation political situation allows national local participation assessment emphasized ensure local analysis situation need appropriate solution reflected included ddr pro gramme need however aware local bias especially tense immediate post conflict environment n building confidence managing expectation possible detailed field assessment linked preparatory assistance project initiative eg community development programme quick impact project build confidence support ddr programme care must taken however raise unrealistic expec tations ddr programme n design field assessment starting assessment ddr practitioner nn identify research objective indicator assessing nn identify source method data collection going obtain information nn develop appropriate analytical tool technique going make sense data nn develop method interpreting finding practical way going apply result n flexible thinking answering question essential developing well designed approach work plan allows systematic well structured data collection process naturally approach change data collection begin field way reduce importance initial guiding blueprint", "ProcessedSent": " nn identify source method data collection going obtain information", "SentID": 2584 }, { "ParagraphID": 837, - "Paragraph": "The following should be considered when planning a detailed field assessment for DDR: \\n Scope: From the start of DDR, practitioners should determine the geographical area that will be covered by the programme, how long the programme will last, and the level of detail and accuracy needed for its smooth running and financing. The scope and depth of this detailed field assessment will depend on the amount of information gathered in previous assessments, such as the technical assessment mission. The current political and military situation in the country concerned and the amount of access possible to areas where combatants are located should also be carefully considered; \\n Thematic areas of focus: The detailed field assessment should deepen understanding, analysis and assessments conducted in the pre\u00admission period. It therefore builds on information gathered on the following thematic areas: \\n\\n political, social and economic context and background; \\n\\n causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \\n\\n identification of specific groups, potential partners and others involved in the discussion process; \\n\\n distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \\n\\n institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \\n\\n survey of socio\u00adeconomic conditions and local capacities to absorb ex\u00adcombatants and their dependants; \\n\\n preconditions and other factors that will influence DDR; \\n\\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \\n\\n (Also see Annex B of IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures.); \\n Expertise: The next step is to identify the DDR expertise required. Assessment teams should be composed of specialists in all aspects of DDR (see IDDRS Level 5 for more information on the different needs that have to be met during a DDR mission). To ensure coherence with the political process and overall objectives of the peacekeeping mandate, the assessment should be led by a member of the UN DDR unit; \\n Local participation: Where the political situation allows, national and local participation in the assessment should be emphasized to ensure that local analyses of the situation, the needs and appropriate solutions are reflected and included in the DDR pro\u00ad gramme. There is a need, however, to be aware of local bias, especially in the tense immediate post\u00adconflict environment; \\n Building confidence and managing expectations: Where possible, detailed field assessments should be linked with preparatory assistance projects and initiatives (e.g., community development programmes and quick\u00adimpact projects) to build confidence in and support for the DDR programme. Care must be taken, however, not to raise unrealistic expec\u00ad tations of the DDR programme; \\n Design of the field assessment: Before starting the assessment, DDR practitioners should: \\n\\n identify the research objectives and indicators (what are we assessing?); \\n\\n identify the sources and methods for data collection (where are we going to obtain our information?); \\n\\n develop appropriate analytical tools and techniques (how are we going to make sense of our data?); \\n\\n develop a method for interpreting the findings in a practical way (how are we going to apply the results?); \\n Being flexible: Thinking about and answering these questions are essential to developing a well\u00addesigned approach and work plan that allows for a systematic and well\u00adstructured data collection process. Naturally, the approach will change once data collection begins in the field, but this should not in any way reduce its importance as an initial guiding blueprint.", + "Paragraph": "The following should be considered when planning a detailed field assessment for DDR: \n Scope: From the start of DDR, practitioners should determine the geographical area that will be covered by the programme, how long the programme will last, and the level of detail and accuracy needed for its smooth running and financing. The scope and depth of this detailed field assessment will depend on the amount of information gathered in previous assessments, such as the technical assessment mission. The current political and military situation in the country concerned and the amount of access possible to areas where combatants are located should also be carefully considered; \n Thematic areas of focus: The detailed field assessment should deepen understanding, analysis and assessments conducted in the pre\u00admission period. It therefore builds on information gathered on the following thematic areas: \n\n political, social and economic context and background; \n\n causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \n\n identification of specific groups, potential partners and others involved in the discussion process; \n\n distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \n\n institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \n\n survey of socio\u00adeconomic conditions and local capacities to absorb ex\u00adcombatants and their dependants; \n\n preconditions and other factors that will influence DDR; \n\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \n\n (Also see Annex B of IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures.); \n Expertise: The next step is to identify the DDR expertise required. Assessment teams should be composed of specialists in all aspects of DDR (see IDDRS Level 5 for more information on the different needs that have to be met during a DDR mission). To ensure coherence with the political process and overall objectives of the peacekeeping mandate, the assessment should be led by a member of the UN DDR unit; \n Local participation: Where the political situation allows, national and local participation in the assessment should be emphasized to ensure that local analyses of the situation, the needs and appropriate solutions are reflected and included in the DDR pro\u00ad gramme. There is a need, however, to be aware of local bias, especially in the tense immediate post\u00adconflict environment; \n Building confidence and managing expectations: Where possible, detailed field assessments should be linked with preparatory assistance projects and initiatives (e.g., community development programmes and quick\u00adimpact projects) to build confidence in and support for the DDR programme. Care must be taken, however, not to raise unrealistic expec\u00ad tations of the DDR programme; \n Design of the field assessment: Before starting the assessment, DDR practitioners should: \n\n identify the research objectives and indicators (what are we assessing?); \n\n identify the sources and methods for data collection (where are we going to obtain our information?); \n\n develop appropriate analytical tools and techniques (how are we going to make sense of our data?); \n\n develop a method for interpreting the findings in a practical way (how are we going to apply the results?); \n Being flexible: Thinking about and answering these questions are essential to developing a well\u00addesigned approach and work plan that allows for a systematic and well\u00adstructured data collection process. Naturally, the approach will change once data collection begins in the field, but this should not in any way reduce its importance as an initial guiding blueprint.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -46542,14 +46542,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Planning for an assessment", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "); \\n\\n develop appropriate analytical tools and techniques (how are we going to make sense of our data?", + "Sentence": "); \n\n develop appropriate analytical tools and techniques (how are we going to make sense of our data?", "newParagraph": "following considered planning detailed field assessment ddr n scope start ddr practitioner determine geographical area covered programme long programme last level detail accuracy needed smooth running financing scope depth detailed field assessment depend amount information gathered previous assessment technical assessment mission current political military situation country concerned amount access possible area combatant located also carefully considered n thematic area focus detailed field assessment deepen understanding analysis assessment conducted pre mission period therefore build information gathered following thematic area nn political social economic context background nn cause dynamic consequence armed conflict nn identification specific group potential partner others involved discussion process nn distribution availability proliferation weapon primarily small arm light weapon nn institutional capacity national stakeholder area related ddr nn survey socio economic condition local capacity absorb ex combatant dependant nn precondition factor influence ddr nn baseline data performance indicator programme design implementation monitoring evaluation nn also see annex b iddrs 310 integrated ddr planning process structure n expertise next step identify ddr expertise required assessment team composed specialist aspect ddr see iddrs level 5 information different need met ddr mission ensure coherence political process overall objective peacekeeping mandate assessment led member un ddr unit n local participation political situation allows national local participation assessment emphasized ensure local analysis situation need appropriate solution reflected included ddr pro gramme need however aware local bias especially tense immediate post conflict environment n building confidence managing expectation possible detailed field assessment linked preparatory assistance project initiative eg community development programme quick impact project build confidence support ddr programme care must taken however raise unrealistic expec tations ddr programme n design field assessment starting assessment ddr practitioner nn identify research objective indicator assessing nn identify source method data collection going obtain information nn develop appropriate analytical tool technique going make sense data nn develop method interpreting finding practical way going apply result n flexible thinking answering question essential developing well designed approach work plan allows systematic well structured data collection process naturally approach change data collection begin field way reduce importance initial guiding blueprint", "ProcessedSent": " nn develop appropriate analytical tool technique going make sense data", "SentID": 2585 }, { "ParagraphID": 837, - "Paragraph": "The following should be considered when planning a detailed field assessment for DDR: \\n Scope: From the start of DDR, practitioners should determine the geographical area that will be covered by the programme, how long the programme will last, and the level of detail and accuracy needed for its smooth running and financing. The scope and depth of this detailed field assessment will depend on the amount of information gathered in previous assessments, such as the technical assessment mission. The current political and military situation in the country concerned and the amount of access possible to areas where combatants are located should also be carefully considered; \\n Thematic areas of focus: The detailed field assessment should deepen understanding, analysis and assessments conducted in the pre\u00admission period. It therefore builds on information gathered on the following thematic areas: \\n\\n political, social and economic context and background; \\n\\n causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \\n\\n identification of specific groups, potential partners and others involved in the discussion process; \\n\\n distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \\n\\n institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \\n\\n survey of socio\u00adeconomic conditions and local capacities to absorb ex\u00adcombatants and their dependants; \\n\\n preconditions and other factors that will influence DDR; \\n\\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \\n\\n (Also see Annex B of IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures.); \\n Expertise: The next step is to identify the DDR expertise required. Assessment teams should be composed of specialists in all aspects of DDR (see IDDRS Level 5 for more information on the different needs that have to be met during a DDR mission). To ensure coherence with the political process and overall objectives of the peacekeeping mandate, the assessment should be led by a member of the UN DDR unit; \\n Local participation: Where the political situation allows, national and local participation in the assessment should be emphasized to ensure that local analyses of the situation, the needs and appropriate solutions are reflected and included in the DDR pro\u00ad gramme. There is a need, however, to be aware of local bias, especially in the tense immediate post\u00adconflict environment; \\n Building confidence and managing expectations: Where possible, detailed field assessments should be linked with preparatory assistance projects and initiatives (e.g., community development programmes and quick\u00adimpact projects) to build confidence in and support for the DDR programme. Care must be taken, however, not to raise unrealistic expec\u00ad tations of the DDR programme; \\n Design of the field assessment: Before starting the assessment, DDR practitioners should: \\n\\n identify the research objectives and indicators (what are we assessing?); \\n\\n identify the sources and methods for data collection (where are we going to obtain our information?); \\n\\n develop appropriate analytical tools and techniques (how are we going to make sense of our data?); \\n\\n develop a method for interpreting the findings in a practical way (how are we going to apply the results?); \\n Being flexible: Thinking about and answering these questions are essential to developing a well\u00addesigned approach and work plan that allows for a systematic and well\u00adstructured data collection process. Naturally, the approach will change once data collection begins in the field, but this should not in any way reduce its importance as an initial guiding blueprint.", + "Paragraph": "The following should be considered when planning a detailed field assessment for DDR: \n Scope: From the start of DDR, practitioners should determine the geographical area that will be covered by the programme, how long the programme will last, and the level of detail and accuracy needed for its smooth running and financing. The scope and depth of this detailed field assessment will depend on the amount of information gathered in previous assessments, such as the technical assessment mission. The current political and military situation in the country concerned and the amount of access possible to areas where combatants are located should also be carefully considered; \n Thematic areas of focus: The detailed field assessment should deepen understanding, analysis and assessments conducted in the pre\u00admission period. It therefore builds on information gathered on the following thematic areas: \n\n political, social and economic context and background; \n\n causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \n\n identification of specific groups, potential partners and others involved in the discussion process; \n\n distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \n\n institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \n\n survey of socio\u00adeconomic conditions and local capacities to absorb ex\u00adcombatants and their dependants; \n\n preconditions and other factors that will influence DDR; \n\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \n\n (Also see Annex B of IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures.); \n Expertise: The next step is to identify the DDR expertise required. Assessment teams should be composed of specialists in all aspects of DDR (see IDDRS Level 5 for more information on the different needs that have to be met during a DDR mission). To ensure coherence with the political process and overall objectives of the peacekeeping mandate, the assessment should be led by a member of the UN DDR unit; \n Local participation: Where the political situation allows, national and local participation in the assessment should be emphasized to ensure that local analyses of the situation, the needs and appropriate solutions are reflected and included in the DDR pro\u00ad gramme. There is a need, however, to be aware of local bias, especially in the tense immediate post\u00adconflict environment; \n Building confidence and managing expectations: Where possible, detailed field assessments should be linked with preparatory assistance projects and initiatives (e.g., community development programmes and quick\u00adimpact projects) to build confidence in and support for the DDR programme. Care must be taken, however, not to raise unrealistic expec\u00ad tations of the DDR programme; \n Design of the field assessment: Before starting the assessment, DDR practitioners should: \n\n identify the research objectives and indicators (what are we assessing?); \n\n identify the sources and methods for data collection (where are we going to obtain our information?); \n\n develop appropriate analytical tools and techniques (how are we going to make sense of our data?); \n\n develop a method for interpreting the findings in a practical way (how are we going to apply the results?); \n Being flexible: Thinking about and answering these questions are essential to developing a well\u00addesigned approach and work plan that allows for a systematic and well\u00adstructured data collection process. Naturally, the approach will change once data collection begins in the field, but this should not in any way reduce its importance as an initial guiding blueprint.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -46560,14 +46560,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Planning for an assessment", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "); \\n\\n develop a method for interpreting the findings in a practical way (how are we going to apply the results?", + "Sentence": "); \n\n develop a method for interpreting the findings in a practical way (how are we going to apply the results?", "newParagraph": "following considered planning detailed field assessment ddr n scope start ddr practitioner determine geographical area covered programme long programme last level detail accuracy needed smooth running financing scope depth detailed field assessment depend amount information gathered previous assessment technical assessment mission current political military situation country concerned amount access possible area combatant located also carefully considered n thematic area focus detailed field assessment deepen understanding analysis assessment conducted pre mission period therefore build information gathered following thematic area nn political social economic context background nn cause dynamic consequence armed conflict nn identification specific group potential partner others involved discussion process nn distribution availability proliferation weapon primarily small arm light weapon nn institutional capacity national stakeholder area related ddr nn survey socio economic condition local capacity absorb ex combatant dependant nn precondition factor influence ddr nn baseline data performance indicator programme design implementation monitoring evaluation nn also see annex b iddrs 310 integrated ddr planning process structure n expertise next step identify ddr expertise required assessment team composed specialist aspect ddr see iddrs level 5 information different need met ddr mission ensure coherence political process overall objective peacekeeping mandate assessment led member un ddr unit n local participation political situation allows national local participation assessment emphasized ensure local analysis situation need appropriate solution reflected included ddr pro gramme need however aware local bias especially tense immediate post conflict environment n building confidence managing expectation possible detailed field assessment linked preparatory assistance project initiative eg community development programme quick impact project build confidence support ddr programme care must taken however raise unrealistic expec tations ddr programme n design field assessment starting assessment ddr practitioner nn identify research objective indicator assessing nn identify source method data collection going obtain information nn develop appropriate analytical tool technique going make sense data nn develop method interpreting finding practical way going apply result n flexible thinking answering question essential developing well designed approach work plan allows systematic well structured data collection process naturally approach change data collection begin field way reduce importance initial guiding blueprint", "ProcessedSent": " nn develop method interpreting finding practical way going apply result", "SentID": 2586 }, { "ParagraphID": 837, - "Paragraph": "The following should be considered when planning a detailed field assessment for DDR: \\n Scope: From the start of DDR, practitioners should determine the geographical area that will be covered by the programme, how long the programme will last, and the level of detail and accuracy needed for its smooth running and financing. The scope and depth of this detailed field assessment will depend on the amount of information gathered in previous assessments, such as the technical assessment mission. The current political and military situation in the country concerned and the amount of access possible to areas where combatants are located should also be carefully considered; \\n Thematic areas of focus: The detailed field assessment should deepen understanding, analysis and assessments conducted in the pre\u00admission period. It therefore builds on information gathered on the following thematic areas: \\n\\n political, social and economic context and background; \\n\\n causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \\n\\n identification of specific groups, potential partners and others involved in the discussion process; \\n\\n distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \\n\\n institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \\n\\n survey of socio\u00adeconomic conditions and local capacities to absorb ex\u00adcombatants and their dependants; \\n\\n preconditions and other factors that will influence DDR; \\n\\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \\n\\n (Also see Annex B of IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures.); \\n Expertise: The next step is to identify the DDR expertise required. Assessment teams should be composed of specialists in all aspects of DDR (see IDDRS Level 5 for more information on the different needs that have to be met during a DDR mission). To ensure coherence with the political process and overall objectives of the peacekeeping mandate, the assessment should be led by a member of the UN DDR unit; \\n Local participation: Where the political situation allows, national and local participation in the assessment should be emphasized to ensure that local analyses of the situation, the needs and appropriate solutions are reflected and included in the DDR pro\u00ad gramme. There is a need, however, to be aware of local bias, especially in the tense immediate post\u00adconflict environment; \\n Building confidence and managing expectations: Where possible, detailed field assessments should be linked with preparatory assistance projects and initiatives (e.g., community development programmes and quick\u00adimpact projects) to build confidence in and support for the DDR programme. Care must be taken, however, not to raise unrealistic expec\u00ad tations of the DDR programme; \\n Design of the field assessment: Before starting the assessment, DDR practitioners should: \\n\\n identify the research objectives and indicators (what are we assessing?); \\n\\n identify the sources and methods for data collection (where are we going to obtain our information?); \\n\\n develop appropriate analytical tools and techniques (how are we going to make sense of our data?); \\n\\n develop a method for interpreting the findings in a practical way (how are we going to apply the results?); \\n Being flexible: Thinking about and answering these questions are essential to developing a well\u00addesigned approach and work plan that allows for a systematic and well\u00adstructured data collection process. Naturally, the approach will change once data collection begins in the field, but this should not in any way reduce its importance as an initial guiding blueprint.", + "Paragraph": "The following should be considered when planning a detailed field assessment for DDR: \n Scope: From the start of DDR, practitioners should determine the geographical area that will be covered by the programme, how long the programme will last, and the level of detail and accuracy needed for its smooth running and financing. The scope and depth of this detailed field assessment will depend on the amount of information gathered in previous assessments, such as the technical assessment mission. The current political and military situation in the country concerned and the amount of access possible to areas where combatants are located should also be carefully considered; \n Thematic areas of focus: The detailed field assessment should deepen understanding, analysis and assessments conducted in the pre\u00admission period. It therefore builds on information gathered on the following thematic areas: \n\n political, social and economic context and background; \n\n causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \n\n identification of specific groups, potential partners and others involved in the discussion process; \n\n distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \n\n institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \n\n survey of socio\u00adeconomic conditions and local capacities to absorb ex\u00adcombatants and their dependants; \n\n preconditions and other factors that will influence DDR; \n\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \n\n (Also see Annex B of IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures.); \n Expertise: The next step is to identify the DDR expertise required. Assessment teams should be composed of specialists in all aspects of DDR (see IDDRS Level 5 for more information on the different needs that have to be met during a DDR mission). To ensure coherence with the political process and overall objectives of the peacekeeping mandate, the assessment should be led by a member of the UN DDR unit; \n Local participation: Where the political situation allows, national and local participation in the assessment should be emphasized to ensure that local analyses of the situation, the needs and appropriate solutions are reflected and included in the DDR pro\u00ad gramme. There is a need, however, to be aware of local bias, especially in the tense immediate post\u00adconflict environment; \n Building confidence and managing expectations: Where possible, detailed field assessments should be linked with preparatory assistance projects and initiatives (e.g., community development programmes and quick\u00adimpact projects) to build confidence in and support for the DDR programme. Care must be taken, however, not to raise unrealistic expec\u00ad tations of the DDR programme; \n Design of the field assessment: Before starting the assessment, DDR practitioners should: \n\n identify the research objectives and indicators (what are we assessing?); \n\n identify the sources and methods for data collection (where are we going to obtain our information?); \n\n develop appropriate analytical tools and techniques (how are we going to make sense of our data?); \n\n develop a method for interpreting the findings in a practical way (how are we going to apply the results?); \n Being flexible: Thinking about and answering these questions are essential to developing a well\u00addesigned approach and work plan that allows for a systematic and well\u00adstructured data collection process. Naturally, the approach will change once data collection begins in the field, but this should not in any way reduce its importance as an initial guiding blueprint.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -46578,14 +46578,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Planning for an assessment", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "); \\n Being flexible: Thinking about and answering these questions are essential to developing a well\u00addesigned approach and work plan that allows for a systematic and well\u00adstructured data collection process.", + "Sentence": "); \n Being flexible: Thinking about and answering these questions are essential to developing a well\u00addesigned approach and work plan that allows for a systematic and well\u00adstructured data collection process.", "newParagraph": "following considered planning detailed field assessment ddr n scope start ddr practitioner determine geographical area covered programme long programme last level detail accuracy needed smooth running financing scope depth detailed field assessment depend amount information gathered previous assessment technical assessment mission current political military situation country concerned amount access possible area combatant located also carefully considered n thematic area focus detailed field assessment deepen understanding analysis assessment conducted pre mission period therefore build information gathered following thematic area nn political social economic context background nn cause dynamic consequence armed conflict nn identification specific group potential partner others involved discussion process nn distribution availability proliferation weapon primarily small arm light weapon nn institutional capacity national stakeholder area related ddr nn survey socio economic condition local capacity absorb ex combatant dependant nn precondition factor influence ddr nn baseline data performance indicator programme design implementation monitoring evaluation nn also see annex b iddrs 310 integrated ddr planning process structure n expertise next step identify ddr expertise required assessment team composed specialist aspect ddr see iddrs level 5 information different need met ddr mission ensure coherence political process overall objective peacekeeping mandate assessment led member un ddr unit n local participation political situation allows national local participation assessment emphasized ensure local analysis situation need appropriate solution reflected included ddr pro gramme need however aware local bias especially tense immediate post conflict environment n building confidence managing expectation possible detailed field assessment linked preparatory assistance project initiative eg community development programme quick impact project build confidence support ddr programme care must taken however raise unrealistic expec tations ddr programme n design field assessment starting assessment ddr practitioner nn identify research objective indicator assessing nn identify source method data collection going obtain information nn develop appropriate analytical tool technique going make sense data nn develop method interpreting finding practical way going apply result n flexible thinking answering question essential developing well designed approach work plan allows systematic well structured data collection process naturally approach change data collection begin field way reduce importance initial guiding blueprint", "ProcessedSent": " n flexible thinking answering question essential developing well designed approach work plan allows systematic well structured data collection process", "SentID": 2587 }, { "ParagraphID": 837, - "Paragraph": "The following should be considered when planning a detailed field assessment for DDR: \\n Scope: From the start of DDR, practitioners should determine the geographical area that will be covered by the programme, how long the programme will last, and the level of detail and accuracy needed for its smooth running and financing. The scope and depth of this detailed field assessment will depend on the amount of information gathered in previous assessments, such as the technical assessment mission. The current political and military situation in the country concerned and the amount of access possible to areas where combatants are located should also be carefully considered; \\n Thematic areas of focus: The detailed field assessment should deepen understanding, analysis and assessments conducted in the pre\u00admission period. It therefore builds on information gathered on the following thematic areas: \\n\\n political, social and economic context and background; \\n\\n causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \\n\\n identification of specific groups, potential partners and others involved in the discussion process; \\n\\n distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \\n\\n institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \\n\\n survey of socio\u00adeconomic conditions and local capacities to absorb ex\u00adcombatants and their dependants; \\n\\n preconditions and other factors that will influence DDR; \\n\\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \\n\\n (Also see Annex B of IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures.); \\n Expertise: The next step is to identify the DDR expertise required. Assessment teams should be composed of specialists in all aspects of DDR (see IDDRS Level 5 for more information on the different needs that have to be met during a DDR mission). To ensure coherence with the political process and overall objectives of the peacekeeping mandate, the assessment should be led by a member of the UN DDR unit; \\n Local participation: Where the political situation allows, national and local participation in the assessment should be emphasized to ensure that local analyses of the situation, the needs and appropriate solutions are reflected and included in the DDR pro\u00ad gramme. There is a need, however, to be aware of local bias, especially in the tense immediate post\u00adconflict environment; \\n Building confidence and managing expectations: Where possible, detailed field assessments should be linked with preparatory assistance projects and initiatives (e.g., community development programmes and quick\u00adimpact projects) to build confidence in and support for the DDR programme. Care must be taken, however, not to raise unrealistic expec\u00ad tations of the DDR programme; \\n Design of the field assessment: Before starting the assessment, DDR practitioners should: \\n\\n identify the research objectives and indicators (what are we assessing?); \\n\\n identify the sources and methods for data collection (where are we going to obtain our information?); \\n\\n develop appropriate analytical tools and techniques (how are we going to make sense of our data?); \\n\\n develop a method for interpreting the findings in a practical way (how are we going to apply the results?); \\n Being flexible: Thinking about and answering these questions are essential to developing a well\u00addesigned approach and work plan that allows for a systematic and well\u00adstructured data collection process. Naturally, the approach will change once data collection begins in the field, but this should not in any way reduce its importance as an initial guiding blueprint.", + "Paragraph": "The following should be considered when planning a detailed field assessment for DDR: \n Scope: From the start of DDR, practitioners should determine the geographical area that will be covered by the programme, how long the programme will last, and the level of detail and accuracy needed for its smooth running and financing. The scope and depth of this detailed field assessment will depend on the amount of information gathered in previous assessments, such as the technical assessment mission. The current political and military situation in the country concerned and the amount of access possible to areas where combatants are located should also be carefully considered; \n Thematic areas of focus: The detailed field assessment should deepen understanding, analysis and assessments conducted in the pre\u00admission period. It therefore builds on information gathered on the following thematic areas: \n\n political, social and economic context and background; \n\n causes, dynamics and consequences of the armed conflict; \n\n identification of specific groups, potential partners and others involved in the discussion process; \n\n distribution, availability and proliferation of weapons (primarily small arms and light weapons); \n\n institutional capacities of national stakeholders in areas related to DDR; \n\n survey of socio\u00adeconomic conditions and local capacities to absorb ex\u00adcombatants and their dependants; \n\n preconditions and other factors that will influence DDR; \n\n baseline data and performance indicators for programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \n\n (Also see Annex B of IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures.); \n Expertise: The next step is to identify the DDR expertise required. Assessment teams should be composed of specialists in all aspects of DDR (see IDDRS Level 5 for more information on the different needs that have to be met during a DDR mission). To ensure coherence with the political process and overall objectives of the peacekeeping mandate, the assessment should be led by a member of the UN DDR unit; \n Local participation: Where the political situation allows, national and local participation in the assessment should be emphasized to ensure that local analyses of the situation, the needs and appropriate solutions are reflected and included in the DDR pro\u00ad gramme. There is a need, however, to be aware of local bias, especially in the tense immediate post\u00adconflict environment; \n Building confidence and managing expectations: Where possible, detailed field assessments should be linked with preparatory assistance projects and initiatives (e.g., community development programmes and quick\u00adimpact projects) to build confidence in and support for the DDR programme. Care must be taken, however, not to raise unrealistic expec\u00ad tations of the DDR programme; \n Design of the field assessment: Before starting the assessment, DDR practitioners should: \n\n identify the research objectives and indicators (what are we assessing?); \n\n identify the sources and methods for data collection (where are we going to obtain our information?); \n\n develop appropriate analytical tools and techniques (how are we going to make sense of our data?); \n\n develop a method for interpreting the findings in a practical way (how are we going to apply the results?); \n Being flexible: Thinking about and answering these questions are essential to developing a well\u00addesigned approach and work plan that allows for a systematic and well\u00adstructured data collection process. Naturally, the approach will change once data collection begins in the field, but this should not in any way reduce its importance as an initial guiding blueprint.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -46603,7 +46603,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 838, - "Paragraph": "Once the outlines for the assessment have been developed, the next stage should be to decide on the best methods to collect data, some of which are: \\n direct observation; \\n key informant interviews and focus groups; \\n mass surveys; \\n participatory assessments; \\n market research; \\n institutional capacity research; \\n sampling.", + "Paragraph": "Once the outlines for the assessment have been developed, the next stage should be to decide on the best methods to collect data, some of which are: \n direct observation; \n key informant interviews and focus groups; \n mass surveys; \n participatory assessments; \n market research; \n institutional capacity research; \n sampling.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -46614,7 +46614,7 @@ "Heading2": "5.3. Implementing the assessment", "Heading3": "5.3.6. Methodologies for data collection", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Once the outlines for the assessment have been developed, the next stage should be to decide on the best methods to collect data, some of which are: \\n direct observation; \\n key informant interviews and focus groups; \\n mass surveys; \\n participatory assessments; \\n market research; \\n institutional capacity research; \\n sampling.", + "Sentence": "Once the outlines for the assessment have been developed, the next stage should be to decide on the best methods to collect data, some of which are: \n direct observation; \n key informant interviews and focus groups; \n mass surveys; \n participatory assessments; \n market research; \n institutional capacity research; \n sampling.", "newParagraph": "outline assessment developed next stage decide best method collect data n direct observation n key informant interview focus group n mass survey n participatory assessment n market research n institutional capacity research n sampling", "ProcessedSent": "outline assessment developed next stage decide best method collect data n direct observation n key informant interview focus group n mass survey n participatory assessment n market research n institutional capacity research n sampling", "SentID": 2589 @@ -47251,7 +47251,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 849, - "Paragraph": "Once datasets for different themes or areas have been generated, the next step is to make sense of the results. Several analytical tools and techniques can be used, depending on the degree of accuracy needed and the quality of the data: \\n Qualitative analytical tools are used to make sense of facts, descriptions and perceptions through comparative analysis, inference, classification and categorization. Such tools help to understand the context; the political, social and historical background; and the details that numbers alone cannot provide; \\n Quantitative analytical tools (statistical, geometric and financial) are used to calculate trends and distribution, and help to accurately show the size and extent, quantity and dispersion of the factors being studied; \\n Estimation and extrapolation help to obtain generalized findings or results from sampled data. Given the large geographical areas in which DDR assessments are carried out, estimating and extrapolating based on a representative sample is the only way to obtain an idea of the \u2018bigger picture\u2019; \\n Triangulation (cross\u00adreferencing), or the comparison of results from three different methods or data sources, helps to confirm the validity of data collected in contexts where infor\u00admation is fragmentary, imprecise or unreliable. Although normally used with direct observation and interviewing (where facts are confirmed by using three or more differ\u00ad ent sources), triangulation can also be applied between different methods, to increase the probability of reaching a reasonably accurate result, and to maximize reliability and validity; \\n Geographic\/Demographic mapping, which draws on all the techniques mentioned above, involves plotting the information gained about participants and beneficiaries geo\u00ad graphically (i.e., the way they are spread over a geographical area) or chronologically (over time) to determine their concentration, spread and any changes over time.", + "Paragraph": "Once datasets for different themes or areas have been generated, the next step is to make sense of the results. Several analytical tools and techniques can be used, depending on the degree of accuracy needed and the quality of the data: \n Qualitative analytical tools are used to make sense of facts, descriptions and perceptions through comparative analysis, inference, classification and categorization. Such tools help to understand the context; the political, social and historical background; and the details that numbers alone cannot provide; \n Quantitative analytical tools (statistical, geometric and financial) are used to calculate trends and distribution, and help to accurately show the size and extent, quantity and dispersion of the factors being studied; \n Estimation and extrapolation help to obtain generalized findings or results from sampled data. Given the large geographical areas in which DDR assessments are carried out, estimating and extrapolating based on a representative sample is the only way to obtain an idea of the \u2018bigger picture\u2019; \n Triangulation (cross\u00adreferencing), or the comparison of results from three different methods or data sources, helps to confirm the validity of data collected in contexts where infor\u00admation is fragmentary, imprecise or unreliable. Although normally used with direct observation and interviewing (where facts are confirmed by using three or more differ\u00ad ent sources), triangulation can also be applied between different methods, to increase the probability of reaching a reasonably accurate result, and to maximize reliability and validity; \n Geographic\/Demographic mapping, which draws on all the techniques mentioned above, involves plotting the information gained about participants and beneficiaries geo\u00ad graphically (i.e., the way they are spread over a geographical area) or chronologically (over time) to determine their concentration, spread and any changes over time.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -47269,7 +47269,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 849, - "Paragraph": "Once datasets for different themes or areas have been generated, the next step is to make sense of the results. Several analytical tools and techniques can be used, depending on the degree of accuracy needed and the quality of the data: \\n Qualitative analytical tools are used to make sense of facts, descriptions and perceptions through comparative analysis, inference, classification and categorization. Such tools help to understand the context; the political, social and historical background; and the details that numbers alone cannot provide; \\n Quantitative analytical tools (statistical, geometric and financial) are used to calculate trends and distribution, and help to accurately show the size and extent, quantity and dispersion of the factors being studied; \\n Estimation and extrapolation help to obtain generalized findings or results from sampled data. Given the large geographical areas in which DDR assessments are carried out, estimating and extrapolating based on a representative sample is the only way to obtain an idea of the \u2018bigger picture\u2019; \\n Triangulation (cross\u00adreferencing), or the comparison of results from three different methods or data sources, helps to confirm the validity of data collected in contexts where infor\u00admation is fragmentary, imprecise or unreliable. Although normally used with direct observation and interviewing (where facts are confirmed by using three or more differ\u00ad ent sources), triangulation can also be applied between different methods, to increase the probability of reaching a reasonably accurate result, and to maximize reliability and validity; \\n Geographic\/Demographic mapping, which draws on all the techniques mentioned above, involves plotting the information gained about participants and beneficiaries geo\u00ad graphically (i.e., the way they are spread over a geographical area) or chronologically (over time) to determine their concentration, spread and any changes over time.", + "Paragraph": "Once datasets for different themes or areas have been generated, the next step is to make sense of the results. Several analytical tools and techniques can be used, depending on the degree of accuracy needed and the quality of the data: \n Qualitative analytical tools are used to make sense of facts, descriptions and perceptions through comparative analysis, inference, classification and categorization. Such tools help to understand the context; the political, social and historical background; and the details that numbers alone cannot provide; \n Quantitative analytical tools (statistical, geometric and financial) are used to calculate trends and distribution, and help to accurately show the size and extent, quantity and dispersion of the factors being studied; \n Estimation and extrapolation help to obtain generalized findings or results from sampled data. Given the large geographical areas in which DDR assessments are carried out, estimating and extrapolating based on a representative sample is the only way to obtain an idea of the \u2018bigger picture\u2019; \n Triangulation (cross\u00adreferencing), or the comparison of results from three different methods or data sources, helps to confirm the validity of data collected in contexts where infor\u00admation is fragmentary, imprecise or unreliable. Although normally used with direct observation and interviewing (where facts are confirmed by using three or more differ\u00ad ent sources), triangulation can also be applied between different methods, to increase the probability of reaching a reasonably accurate result, and to maximize reliability and validity; \n Geographic\/Demographic mapping, which draws on all the techniques mentioned above, involves plotting the information gained about participants and beneficiaries geo\u00ad graphically (i.e., the way they are spread over a geographical area) or chronologically (over time) to determine their concentration, spread and any changes over time.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -47280,14 +47280,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3.7. Analysing results: Tools and techniques", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Several analytical tools and techniques can be used, depending on the degree of accuracy needed and the quality of the data: \\n Qualitative analytical tools are used to make sense of facts, descriptions and perceptions through comparative analysis, inference, classification and categorization.", + "Sentence": "Several analytical tools and techniques can be used, depending on the degree of accuracy needed and the quality of the data: \n Qualitative analytical tools are used to make sense of facts, descriptions and perceptions through comparative analysis, inference, classification and categorization.", "newParagraph": "datasets different theme area generated next step make sense result several analytical tool technique used depending degree accuracy needed quality data n qualitative analytical tool used make sense fact description perception comparative analysis inference classification categorization tool help understand context political social historical background detail number alone cannot provide n quantitative analytical tool statistical geometric financial used calculate trend distribution help accurately show size extent quantity dispersion factor studied n estimation extrapolation help obtain generalized finding result sampled data given large geographical area ddr assessment carried estimating extrapolating based representative sample way obtain idea bigger picture n triangulation cross referencing comparison result three different method data source help confirm validity data collected context infor mation fragmentary imprecise unreliable although normally used direct observation interviewing fact confirmed using three differ ent source triangulation also applied different method increase probability reaching reasonably accurate result maximize reliability validity n geographicdemographic mapping draw technique mentioned involves plotting information gained participant beneficiary geo graphically ie way spread geographical area chronologically time determine concentration spread change time", "ProcessedSent": "several analytical tool technique used depending degree accuracy needed quality data n qualitative analytical tool used make sense fact description perception comparative analysis inference classification categorization", "SentID": 2626 }, { "ParagraphID": 849, - "Paragraph": "Once datasets for different themes or areas have been generated, the next step is to make sense of the results. Several analytical tools and techniques can be used, depending on the degree of accuracy needed and the quality of the data: \\n Qualitative analytical tools are used to make sense of facts, descriptions and perceptions through comparative analysis, inference, classification and categorization. Such tools help to understand the context; the political, social and historical background; and the details that numbers alone cannot provide; \\n Quantitative analytical tools (statistical, geometric and financial) are used to calculate trends and distribution, and help to accurately show the size and extent, quantity and dispersion of the factors being studied; \\n Estimation and extrapolation help to obtain generalized findings or results from sampled data. Given the large geographical areas in which DDR assessments are carried out, estimating and extrapolating based on a representative sample is the only way to obtain an idea of the \u2018bigger picture\u2019; \\n Triangulation (cross\u00adreferencing), or the comparison of results from three different methods or data sources, helps to confirm the validity of data collected in contexts where infor\u00admation is fragmentary, imprecise or unreliable. Although normally used with direct observation and interviewing (where facts are confirmed by using three or more differ\u00ad ent sources), triangulation can also be applied between different methods, to increase the probability of reaching a reasonably accurate result, and to maximize reliability and validity; \\n Geographic\/Demographic mapping, which draws on all the techniques mentioned above, involves plotting the information gained about participants and beneficiaries geo\u00ad graphically (i.e., the way they are spread over a geographical area) or chronologically (over time) to determine their concentration, spread and any changes over time.", + "Paragraph": "Once datasets for different themes or areas have been generated, the next step is to make sense of the results. Several analytical tools and techniques can be used, depending on the degree of accuracy needed and the quality of the data: \n Qualitative analytical tools are used to make sense of facts, descriptions and perceptions through comparative analysis, inference, classification and categorization. Such tools help to understand the context; the political, social and historical background; and the details that numbers alone cannot provide; \n Quantitative analytical tools (statistical, geometric and financial) are used to calculate trends and distribution, and help to accurately show the size and extent, quantity and dispersion of the factors being studied; \n Estimation and extrapolation help to obtain generalized findings or results from sampled data. Given the large geographical areas in which DDR assessments are carried out, estimating and extrapolating based on a representative sample is the only way to obtain an idea of the \u2018bigger picture\u2019; \n Triangulation (cross\u00adreferencing), or the comparison of results from three different methods or data sources, helps to confirm the validity of data collected in contexts where infor\u00admation is fragmentary, imprecise or unreliable. Although normally used with direct observation and interviewing (where facts are confirmed by using three or more differ\u00ad ent sources), triangulation can also be applied between different methods, to increase the probability of reaching a reasonably accurate result, and to maximize reliability and validity; \n Geographic\/Demographic mapping, which draws on all the techniques mentioned above, involves plotting the information gained about participants and beneficiaries geo\u00ad graphically (i.e., the way they are spread over a geographical area) or chronologically (over time) to determine their concentration, spread and any changes over time.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -47298,14 +47298,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3.7. Analysing results: Tools and techniques", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Such tools help to understand the context; the political, social and historical background; and the details that numbers alone cannot provide; \\n Quantitative analytical tools (statistical, geometric and financial) are used to calculate trends and distribution, and help to accurately show the size and extent, quantity and dispersion of the factors being studied; \\n Estimation and extrapolation help to obtain generalized findings or results from sampled data.", + "Sentence": "Such tools help to understand the context; the political, social and historical background; and the details that numbers alone cannot provide; \n Quantitative analytical tools (statistical, geometric and financial) are used to calculate trends and distribution, and help to accurately show the size and extent, quantity and dispersion of the factors being studied; \n Estimation and extrapolation help to obtain generalized findings or results from sampled data.", "newParagraph": "datasets different theme area generated next step make sense result several analytical tool technique used depending degree accuracy needed quality data n qualitative analytical tool used make sense fact description perception comparative analysis inference classification categorization tool help understand context political social historical background detail number alone cannot provide n quantitative analytical tool statistical geometric financial used calculate trend distribution help accurately show size extent quantity dispersion factor studied n estimation extrapolation help obtain generalized finding result sampled data given large geographical area ddr assessment carried estimating extrapolating based representative sample way obtain idea bigger picture n triangulation cross referencing comparison result three different method data source help confirm validity data collected context infor mation fragmentary imprecise unreliable although normally used direct observation interviewing fact confirmed using three differ ent source triangulation also applied different method increase probability reaching reasonably accurate result maximize reliability validity n geographicdemographic mapping draw technique mentioned involves plotting information gained participant beneficiary geo graphically ie way spread geographical area chronologically time determine concentration spread change time", "ProcessedSent": "tool help understand context political social historical background detail number alone cannot provide n quantitative analytical tool statistical geometric financial used calculate trend distribution help accurately show size extent quantity dispersion factor studied n estimation extrapolation help obtain generalized finding result sampled data", "SentID": 2627 }, { "ParagraphID": 849, - "Paragraph": "Once datasets for different themes or areas have been generated, the next step is to make sense of the results. Several analytical tools and techniques can be used, depending on the degree of accuracy needed and the quality of the data: \\n Qualitative analytical tools are used to make sense of facts, descriptions and perceptions through comparative analysis, inference, classification and categorization. Such tools help to understand the context; the political, social and historical background; and the details that numbers alone cannot provide; \\n Quantitative analytical tools (statistical, geometric and financial) are used to calculate trends and distribution, and help to accurately show the size and extent, quantity and dispersion of the factors being studied; \\n Estimation and extrapolation help to obtain generalized findings or results from sampled data. Given the large geographical areas in which DDR assessments are carried out, estimating and extrapolating based on a representative sample is the only way to obtain an idea of the \u2018bigger picture\u2019; \\n Triangulation (cross\u00adreferencing), or the comparison of results from three different methods or data sources, helps to confirm the validity of data collected in contexts where infor\u00admation is fragmentary, imprecise or unreliable. Although normally used with direct observation and interviewing (where facts are confirmed by using three or more differ\u00ad ent sources), triangulation can also be applied between different methods, to increase the probability of reaching a reasonably accurate result, and to maximize reliability and validity; \\n Geographic\/Demographic mapping, which draws on all the techniques mentioned above, involves plotting the information gained about participants and beneficiaries geo\u00ad graphically (i.e., the way they are spread over a geographical area) or chronologically (over time) to determine their concentration, spread and any changes over time.", + "Paragraph": "Once datasets for different themes or areas have been generated, the next step is to make sense of the results. Several analytical tools and techniques can be used, depending on the degree of accuracy needed and the quality of the data: \n Qualitative analytical tools are used to make sense of facts, descriptions and perceptions through comparative analysis, inference, classification and categorization. Such tools help to understand the context; the political, social and historical background; and the details that numbers alone cannot provide; \n Quantitative analytical tools (statistical, geometric and financial) are used to calculate trends and distribution, and help to accurately show the size and extent, quantity and dispersion of the factors being studied; \n Estimation and extrapolation help to obtain generalized findings or results from sampled data. Given the large geographical areas in which DDR assessments are carried out, estimating and extrapolating based on a representative sample is the only way to obtain an idea of the \u2018bigger picture\u2019; \n Triangulation (cross\u00adreferencing), or the comparison of results from three different methods or data sources, helps to confirm the validity of data collected in contexts where infor\u00admation is fragmentary, imprecise or unreliable. Although normally used with direct observation and interviewing (where facts are confirmed by using three or more differ\u00ad ent sources), triangulation can also be applied between different methods, to increase the probability of reaching a reasonably accurate result, and to maximize reliability and validity; \n Geographic\/Demographic mapping, which draws on all the techniques mentioned above, involves plotting the information gained about participants and beneficiaries geo\u00ad graphically (i.e., the way they are spread over a geographical area) or chronologically (over time) to determine their concentration, spread and any changes over time.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -47316,14 +47316,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3.7. Analysing results: Tools and techniques", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Given the large geographical areas in which DDR assessments are carried out, estimating and extrapolating based on a representative sample is the only way to obtain an idea of the \u2018bigger picture\u2019; \\n Triangulation (cross\u00adreferencing), or the comparison of results from three different methods or data sources, helps to confirm the validity of data collected in contexts where infor\u00admation is fragmentary, imprecise or unreliable.", + "Sentence": "Given the large geographical areas in which DDR assessments are carried out, estimating and extrapolating based on a representative sample is the only way to obtain an idea of the \u2018bigger picture\u2019; \n Triangulation (cross\u00adreferencing), or the comparison of results from three different methods or data sources, helps to confirm the validity of data collected in contexts where infor\u00admation is fragmentary, imprecise or unreliable.", "newParagraph": "datasets different theme area generated next step make sense result several analytical tool technique used depending degree accuracy needed quality data n qualitative analytical tool used make sense fact description perception comparative analysis inference classification categorization tool help understand context political social historical background detail number alone cannot provide n quantitative analytical tool statistical geometric financial used calculate trend distribution help accurately show size extent quantity dispersion factor studied n estimation extrapolation help obtain generalized finding result sampled data given large geographical area ddr assessment carried estimating extrapolating based representative sample way obtain idea bigger picture n triangulation cross referencing comparison result three different method data source help confirm validity data collected context infor mation fragmentary imprecise unreliable although normally used direct observation interviewing fact confirmed using three differ ent source triangulation also applied different method increase probability reaching reasonably accurate result maximize reliability validity n geographicdemographic mapping draw technique mentioned involves plotting information gained participant beneficiary geo graphically ie way spread geographical area chronologically time determine concentration spread change time", "ProcessedSent": "given large geographical area ddr assessment carried estimating extrapolating based representative sample way obtain idea bigger picture n triangulation cross referencing comparison result three different method data source help confirm validity data collected context infor mation fragmentary imprecise unreliable", "SentID": 2628 }, { "ParagraphID": 849, - "Paragraph": "Once datasets for different themes or areas have been generated, the next step is to make sense of the results. Several analytical tools and techniques can be used, depending on the degree of accuracy needed and the quality of the data: \\n Qualitative analytical tools are used to make sense of facts, descriptions and perceptions through comparative analysis, inference, classification and categorization. Such tools help to understand the context; the political, social and historical background; and the details that numbers alone cannot provide; \\n Quantitative analytical tools (statistical, geometric and financial) are used to calculate trends and distribution, and help to accurately show the size and extent, quantity and dispersion of the factors being studied; \\n Estimation and extrapolation help to obtain generalized findings or results from sampled data. Given the large geographical areas in which DDR assessments are carried out, estimating and extrapolating based on a representative sample is the only way to obtain an idea of the \u2018bigger picture\u2019; \\n Triangulation (cross\u00adreferencing), or the comparison of results from three different methods or data sources, helps to confirm the validity of data collected in contexts where infor\u00admation is fragmentary, imprecise or unreliable. Although normally used with direct observation and interviewing (where facts are confirmed by using three or more differ\u00ad ent sources), triangulation can also be applied between different methods, to increase the probability of reaching a reasonably accurate result, and to maximize reliability and validity; \\n Geographic\/Demographic mapping, which draws on all the techniques mentioned above, involves plotting the information gained about participants and beneficiaries geo\u00ad graphically (i.e., the way they are spread over a geographical area) or chronologically (over time) to determine their concentration, spread and any changes over time.", + "Paragraph": "Once datasets for different themes or areas have been generated, the next step is to make sense of the results. Several analytical tools and techniques can be used, depending on the degree of accuracy needed and the quality of the data: \n Qualitative analytical tools are used to make sense of facts, descriptions and perceptions through comparative analysis, inference, classification and categorization. Such tools help to understand the context; the political, social and historical background; and the details that numbers alone cannot provide; \n Quantitative analytical tools (statistical, geometric and financial) are used to calculate trends and distribution, and help to accurately show the size and extent, quantity and dispersion of the factors being studied; \n Estimation and extrapolation help to obtain generalized findings or results from sampled data. Given the large geographical areas in which DDR assessments are carried out, estimating and extrapolating based on a representative sample is the only way to obtain an idea of the \u2018bigger picture\u2019; \n Triangulation (cross\u00adreferencing), or the comparison of results from three different methods or data sources, helps to confirm the validity of data collected in contexts where infor\u00admation is fragmentary, imprecise or unreliable. Although normally used with direct observation and interviewing (where facts are confirmed by using three or more differ\u00ad ent sources), triangulation can also be applied between different methods, to increase the probability of reaching a reasonably accurate result, and to maximize reliability and validity; \n Geographic\/Demographic mapping, which draws on all the techniques mentioned above, involves plotting the information gained about participants and beneficiaries geo\u00ad graphically (i.e., the way they are spread over a geographical area) or chronologically (over time) to determine their concentration, spread and any changes over time.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -47334,7 +47334,7 @@ "Heading2": "5.3.7. Analysing results: Tools and techniques", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Although normally used with direct observation and interviewing (where facts are confirmed by using three or more differ\u00ad ent sources), triangulation can also be applied between different methods, to increase the probability of reaching a reasonably accurate result, and to maximize reliability and validity; \\n Geographic\/Demographic mapping, which draws on all the techniques mentioned above, involves plotting the information gained about participants and beneficiaries geo\u00ad graphically (i.e., the way they are spread over a geographical area) or chronologically (over time) to determine their concentration, spread and any changes over time.", + "Sentence": "Although normally used with direct observation and interviewing (where facts are confirmed by using three or more differ\u00ad ent sources), triangulation can also be applied between different methods, to increase the probability of reaching a reasonably accurate result, and to maximize reliability and validity; \n Geographic\/Demographic mapping, which draws on all the techniques mentioned above, involves plotting the information gained about participants and beneficiaries geo\u00ad graphically (i.e., the way they are spread over a geographical area) or chronologically (over time) to determine their concentration, spread and any changes over time.", "newParagraph": "datasets different theme area generated next step make sense result several analytical tool technique used depending degree accuracy needed quality data n qualitative analytical tool used make sense fact description perception comparative analysis inference classification categorization tool help understand context political social historical background detail number alone cannot provide n quantitative analytical tool statistical geometric financial used calculate trend distribution help accurately show size extent quantity dispersion factor studied n estimation extrapolation help obtain generalized finding result sampled data given large geographical area ddr assessment carried estimating extrapolating based representative sample way obtain idea bigger picture n triangulation cross referencing comparison result three different method data source help confirm validity data collected context infor mation fragmentary imprecise unreliable although normally used direct observation interviewing fact confirmed using three differ ent source triangulation also applied different method increase probability reaching reasonably accurate result maximize reliability validity n geographicdemographic mapping draw technique mentioned involves plotting information gained participant beneficiary geo graphically ie way spread geographical area chronologically time determine concentration spread change time", "ProcessedSent": "although normally used direct observation interviewing fact confirmed using three differ ent source triangulation also applied different method increase probability reaching reasonably accurate result maximize reliability validity n geographicdemographic mapping draw technique mentioned involves plotting information gained participant beneficiary geo graphically ie way spread geographical area chronologically time determine concentration spread change time", "SentID": 2629 @@ -47395,7 +47395,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 852, - "Paragraph": "The DDR programme document should be based on an in\u00addepth understanding of the national or local context and the situation in which the programme is to be implemented, as this will shape the objectives, overall strategy and criteria for entry, as follows: \\n General context and problem: This defines the \u2018problem\u2019 of DDR in the specific context in which it will be implemented (levels of violence, provisions in peace accords, lack of alternative livelihoods for ex\u00adcombatants, etc.), with a focus on the nature and con\u00ad sequences of the conflict; existing national and local capacities for DDR and SSR; and the broad political, social and economic characteristics of the operating environment; \\n Rationale and justification: Drawing from the situation analysis, this explains the need for DDR: why the approach suggested is an appropriate and viable response to the identified problem, the antecedents to the problem (i.e., what caused the problem in the first place) and degree of political will for its resolution; and any other factors that provide a compelling argument for undertaking DDR. In addition, the engagement and role of the UN should be specified here; \\n Overview of armed forces and groups: This section should provide an overview of all armed forces and groups and their key characteristics, e.g., force\/group strength, loca\u00ad tion, organization and structure, political affiliations, type of weaponry, etc. This information should be the basis for developing specifically designed strategies and approaches for the DDR of the armed forces and groups (see Annex D for a sample table of armed forces and groups); \\n Definition of participants and beneficiaries: Drawing on the comprehensive assessments and profiles of armed groups and forces and levels of violence that are normally inclu\u00ad ded in the framework, this section should identify which armed groups and forces should be prioritized for DDR programmes. This prioritization should be based on their involvement in or potential to cause violence, or otherwise affect security and the peace process. In addition, subgroups that should be given special attention (e.g., special needs groups) should be identified; \\n Socio-economic profile in areas of return: A general overview of socio\u00adeconomic conditions in the areas and communities to which ex\u00adcombatants will return is important in order to define both the general context of reintegration and specific strategies to ensure effec\u00ad tive and sustainable support for it. Such an overview can also provide an indication of how much pre\u00adDDR community recovery and reconstruction assistance will be necessary to improve the communities\u2019 capacity to absorb former combatants and other returning populations, and list potential links to other, either ongoing or planned, reconstruction and development initiatives.", + "Paragraph": "The DDR programme document should be based on an in\u00addepth understanding of the national or local context and the situation in which the programme is to be implemented, as this will shape the objectives, overall strategy and criteria for entry, as follows: \n General context and problem: This defines the \u2018problem\u2019 of DDR in the specific context in which it will be implemented (levels of violence, provisions in peace accords, lack of alternative livelihoods for ex\u00adcombatants, etc.), with a focus on the nature and con\u00ad sequences of the conflict; existing national and local capacities for DDR and SSR; and the broad political, social and economic characteristics of the operating environment; \n Rationale and justification: Drawing from the situation analysis, this explains the need for DDR: why the approach suggested is an appropriate and viable response to the identified problem, the antecedents to the problem (i.e., what caused the problem in the first place) and degree of political will for its resolution; and any other factors that provide a compelling argument for undertaking DDR. In addition, the engagement and role of the UN should be specified here; \n Overview of armed forces and groups: This section should provide an overview of all armed forces and groups and their key characteristics, e.g., force\/group strength, loca\u00ad tion, organization and structure, political affiliations, type of weaponry, etc. This information should be the basis for developing specifically designed strategies and approaches for the DDR of the armed forces and groups (see Annex D for a sample table of armed forces and groups); \n Definition of participants and beneficiaries: Drawing on the comprehensive assessments and profiles of armed groups and forces and levels of violence that are normally inclu\u00ad ded in the framework, this section should identify which armed groups and forces should be prioritized for DDR programmes. This prioritization should be based on their involvement in or potential to cause violence, or otherwise affect security and the peace process. In addition, subgroups that should be given special attention (e.g., special needs groups) should be identified; \n Socio-economic profile in areas of return: A general overview of socio\u00adeconomic conditions in the areas and communities to which ex\u00adcombatants will return is important in order to define both the general context of reintegration and specific strategies to ensure effec\u00ad tive and sustainable support for it. Such an overview can also provide an indication of how much pre\u00adDDR community recovery and reconstruction assistance will be necessary to improve the communities\u2019 capacity to absorb former combatants and other returning populations, and list potential links to other, either ongoing or planned, reconstruction and development initiatives.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -47406,14 +47406,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1. Contextual analysis and rationale", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The DDR programme document should be based on an in\u00addepth understanding of the national or local context and the situation in which the programme is to be implemented, as this will shape the objectives, overall strategy and criteria for entry, as follows: \\n General context and problem: This defines the \u2018problem\u2019 of DDR in the specific context in which it will be implemented (levels of violence, provisions in peace accords, lack of alternative livelihoods for ex\u00adcombatants, etc.", + "Sentence": "The DDR programme document should be based on an in\u00addepth understanding of the national or local context and the situation in which the programme is to be implemented, as this will shape the objectives, overall strategy and criteria for entry, as follows: \n General context and problem: This defines the \u2018problem\u2019 of DDR in the specific context in which it will be implemented (levels of violence, provisions in peace accords, lack of alternative livelihoods for ex\u00adcombatants, etc.", "newParagraph": "ddr programme document based depth understanding national local context situation programme implemented shape objective overall strategy criterion entry follows n general context problem defines problem ddr specific context implemented level violence provision peace accord lack alternative livelihood ex combatant etc focus nature con sequence conflict existing national local capacity ddr ssr broad political social economic characteristic operating environment n rationale justification drawing situation analysis explains need ddr approach suggested appropriate viable response identified problem antecedent problem ie caused problem first place degree political resolution factor provide compelling argument undertaking ddr addition engagement role un specified n overview armed force group section provide overview armed force group key characteristic eg forcegroup strength loca tion organization structure political affiliation type weaponry etc information basis developing specifically designed strategy approach ddr armed force group see annex sample table armed force group n definition participant beneficiary drawing comprehensive assessment profile armed group force level violence normally inclu ded framework section identify armed group force prioritized ddr programme prioritization based involvement potential cause violence otherwise affect security peace process addition subgroup given special attention eg special need group identified n socioeconomic profile area return general overview socio economic condition area community ex combatant return important order define general context reintegration specific strategy ensure effec tive sustainable support overview also provide indication much pre ddr community recovery reconstruction assistance necessary improve community capacity absorb former combatant returning population list potential link either ongoing planned reconstruction development initiative", "ProcessedSent": "ddr programme document based depth understanding national local context situation programme implemented shape objective overall strategy criterion entry follows n general context problem defines problem ddr specific context implemented level violence provision peace accord lack alternative livelihood ex combatant etc", "SentID": 2633 }, { "ParagraphID": 852, - "Paragraph": "The DDR programme document should be based on an in\u00addepth understanding of the national or local context and the situation in which the programme is to be implemented, as this will shape the objectives, overall strategy and criteria for entry, as follows: \\n General context and problem: This defines the \u2018problem\u2019 of DDR in the specific context in which it will be implemented (levels of violence, provisions in peace accords, lack of alternative livelihoods for ex\u00adcombatants, etc.), with a focus on the nature and con\u00ad sequences of the conflict; existing national and local capacities for DDR and SSR; and the broad political, social and economic characteristics of the operating environment; \\n Rationale and justification: Drawing from the situation analysis, this explains the need for DDR: why the approach suggested is an appropriate and viable response to the identified problem, the antecedents to the problem (i.e., what caused the problem in the first place) and degree of political will for its resolution; and any other factors that provide a compelling argument for undertaking DDR. In addition, the engagement and role of the UN should be specified here; \\n Overview of armed forces and groups: This section should provide an overview of all armed forces and groups and their key characteristics, e.g., force\/group strength, loca\u00ad tion, organization and structure, political affiliations, type of weaponry, etc. This information should be the basis for developing specifically designed strategies and approaches for the DDR of the armed forces and groups (see Annex D for a sample table of armed forces and groups); \\n Definition of participants and beneficiaries: Drawing on the comprehensive assessments and profiles of armed groups and forces and levels of violence that are normally inclu\u00ad ded in the framework, this section should identify which armed groups and forces should be prioritized for DDR programmes. This prioritization should be based on their involvement in or potential to cause violence, or otherwise affect security and the peace process. In addition, subgroups that should be given special attention (e.g., special needs groups) should be identified; \\n Socio-economic profile in areas of return: A general overview of socio\u00adeconomic conditions in the areas and communities to which ex\u00adcombatants will return is important in order to define both the general context of reintegration and specific strategies to ensure effec\u00ad tive and sustainable support for it. Such an overview can also provide an indication of how much pre\u00adDDR community recovery and reconstruction assistance will be necessary to improve the communities\u2019 capacity to absorb former combatants and other returning populations, and list potential links to other, either ongoing or planned, reconstruction and development initiatives.", + "Paragraph": "The DDR programme document should be based on an in\u00addepth understanding of the national or local context and the situation in which the programme is to be implemented, as this will shape the objectives, overall strategy and criteria for entry, as follows: \n General context and problem: This defines the \u2018problem\u2019 of DDR in the specific context in which it will be implemented (levels of violence, provisions in peace accords, lack of alternative livelihoods for ex\u00adcombatants, etc.), with a focus on the nature and con\u00ad sequences of the conflict; existing national and local capacities for DDR and SSR; and the broad political, social and economic characteristics of the operating environment; \n Rationale and justification: Drawing from the situation analysis, this explains the need for DDR: why the approach suggested is an appropriate and viable response to the identified problem, the antecedents to the problem (i.e., what caused the problem in the first place) and degree of political will for its resolution; and any other factors that provide a compelling argument for undertaking DDR. In addition, the engagement and role of the UN should be specified here; \n Overview of armed forces and groups: This section should provide an overview of all armed forces and groups and their key characteristics, e.g., force\/group strength, loca\u00ad tion, organization and structure, political affiliations, type of weaponry, etc. This information should be the basis for developing specifically designed strategies and approaches for the DDR of the armed forces and groups (see Annex D for a sample table of armed forces and groups); \n Definition of participants and beneficiaries: Drawing on the comprehensive assessments and profiles of armed groups and forces and levels of violence that are normally inclu\u00ad ded in the framework, this section should identify which armed groups and forces should be prioritized for DDR programmes. This prioritization should be based on their involvement in or potential to cause violence, or otherwise affect security and the peace process. In addition, subgroups that should be given special attention (e.g., special needs groups) should be identified; \n Socio-economic profile in areas of return: A general overview of socio\u00adeconomic conditions in the areas and communities to which ex\u00adcombatants will return is important in order to define both the general context of reintegration and specific strategies to ensure effec\u00ad tive and sustainable support for it. Such an overview can also provide an indication of how much pre\u00adDDR community recovery and reconstruction assistance will be necessary to improve the communities\u2019 capacity to absorb former combatants and other returning populations, and list potential links to other, either ongoing or planned, reconstruction and development initiatives.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -47424,14 +47424,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1. Contextual analysis and rationale", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "), with a focus on the nature and con\u00ad sequences of the conflict; existing national and local capacities for DDR and SSR; and the broad political, social and economic characteristics of the operating environment; \\n Rationale and justification: Drawing from the situation analysis, this explains the need for DDR: why the approach suggested is an appropriate and viable response to the identified problem, the antecedents to the problem (i.e., what caused the problem in the first place) and degree of political will for its resolution; and any other factors that provide a compelling argument for undertaking DDR.", + "Sentence": "), with a focus on the nature and con\u00ad sequences of the conflict; existing national and local capacities for DDR and SSR; and the broad political, social and economic characteristics of the operating environment; \n Rationale and justification: Drawing from the situation analysis, this explains the need for DDR: why the approach suggested is an appropriate and viable response to the identified problem, the antecedents to the problem (i.e., what caused the problem in the first place) and degree of political will for its resolution; and any other factors that provide a compelling argument for undertaking DDR.", "newParagraph": "ddr programme document based depth understanding national local context situation programme implemented shape objective overall strategy criterion entry follows n general context problem defines problem ddr specific context implemented level violence provision peace accord lack alternative livelihood ex combatant etc focus nature con sequence conflict existing national local capacity ddr ssr broad political social economic characteristic operating environment n rationale justification drawing situation analysis explains need ddr approach suggested appropriate viable response identified problem antecedent problem ie caused problem first place degree political resolution factor provide compelling argument undertaking ddr addition engagement role un specified n overview armed force group section provide overview armed force group key characteristic eg forcegroup strength loca tion organization structure political affiliation type weaponry etc information basis developing specifically designed strategy approach ddr armed force group see annex sample table armed force group n definition participant beneficiary drawing comprehensive assessment profile armed group force level violence normally inclu ded framework section identify armed group force prioritized ddr programme prioritization based involvement potential cause violence otherwise affect security peace process addition subgroup given special attention eg special need group identified n socioeconomic profile area return general overview socio economic condition area community ex combatant return important order define general context reintegration specific strategy ensure effec tive sustainable support overview also provide indication much pre ddr community recovery reconstruction assistance necessary improve community capacity absorb former combatant returning population list potential link either ongoing planned reconstruction development initiative", "ProcessedSent": " focus nature con sequence conflict existing national local capacity ddr ssr broad political social economic characteristic operating environment n rationale justification drawing situation analysis explains need ddr approach suggested appropriate viable response identified problem antecedent problem ie caused problem first place degree political resolution factor provide compelling argument undertaking ddr", "SentID": 2634 }, { "ParagraphID": 852, - "Paragraph": "The DDR programme document should be based on an in\u00addepth understanding of the national or local context and the situation in which the programme is to be implemented, as this will shape the objectives, overall strategy and criteria for entry, as follows: \\n General context and problem: This defines the \u2018problem\u2019 of DDR in the specific context in which it will be implemented (levels of violence, provisions in peace accords, lack of alternative livelihoods for ex\u00adcombatants, etc.), with a focus on the nature and con\u00ad sequences of the conflict; existing national and local capacities for DDR and SSR; and the broad political, social and economic characteristics of the operating environment; \\n Rationale and justification: Drawing from the situation analysis, this explains the need for DDR: why the approach suggested is an appropriate and viable response to the identified problem, the antecedents to the problem (i.e., what caused the problem in the first place) and degree of political will for its resolution; and any other factors that provide a compelling argument for undertaking DDR. In addition, the engagement and role of the UN should be specified here; \\n Overview of armed forces and groups: This section should provide an overview of all armed forces and groups and their key characteristics, e.g., force\/group strength, loca\u00ad tion, organization and structure, political affiliations, type of weaponry, etc. This information should be the basis for developing specifically designed strategies and approaches for the DDR of the armed forces and groups (see Annex D for a sample table of armed forces and groups); \\n Definition of participants and beneficiaries: Drawing on the comprehensive assessments and profiles of armed groups and forces and levels of violence that are normally inclu\u00ad ded in the framework, this section should identify which armed groups and forces should be prioritized for DDR programmes. This prioritization should be based on their involvement in or potential to cause violence, or otherwise affect security and the peace process. In addition, subgroups that should be given special attention (e.g., special needs groups) should be identified; \\n Socio-economic profile in areas of return: A general overview of socio\u00adeconomic conditions in the areas and communities to which ex\u00adcombatants will return is important in order to define both the general context of reintegration and specific strategies to ensure effec\u00ad tive and sustainable support for it. Such an overview can also provide an indication of how much pre\u00adDDR community recovery and reconstruction assistance will be necessary to improve the communities\u2019 capacity to absorb former combatants and other returning populations, and list potential links to other, either ongoing or planned, reconstruction and development initiatives.", + "Paragraph": "The DDR programme document should be based on an in\u00addepth understanding of the national or local context and the situation in which the programme is to be implemented, as this will shape the objectives, overall strategy and criteria for entry, as follows: \n General context and problem: This defines the \u2018problem\u2019 of DDR in the specific context in which it will be implemented (levels of violence, provisions in peace accords, lack of alternative livelihoods for ex\u00adcombatants, etc.), with a focus on the nature and con\u00ad sequences of the conflict; existing national and local capacities for DDR and SSR; and the broad political, social and economic characteristics of the operating environment; \n Rationale and justification: Drawing from the situation analysis, this explains the need for DDR: why the approach suggested is an appropriate and viable response to the identified problem, the antecedents to the problem (i.e., what caused the problem in the first place) and degree of political will for its resolution; and any other factors that provide a compelling argument for undertaking DDR. In addition, the engagement and role of the UN should be specified here; \n Overview of armed forces and groups: This section should provide an overview of all armed forces and groups and their key characteristics, e.g., force\/group strength, loca\u00ad tion, organization and structure, political affiliations, type of weaponry, etc. This information should be the basis for developing specifically designed strategies and approaches for the DDR of the armed forces and groups (see Annex D for a sample table of armed forces and groups); \n Definition of participants and beneficiaries: Drawing on the comprehensive assessments and profiles of armed groups and forces and levels of violence that are normally inclu\u00ad ded in the framework, this section should identify which armed groups and forces should be prioritized for DDR programmes. This prioritization should be based on their involvement in or potential to cause violence, or otherwise affect security and the peace process. In addition, subgroups that should be given special attention (e.g., special needs groups) should be identified; \n Socio-economic profile in areas of return: A general overview of socio\u00adeconomic conditions in the areas and communities to which ex\u00adcombatants will return is important in order to define both the general context of reintegration and specific strategies to ensure effec\u00ad tive and sustainable support for it. Such an overview can also provide an indication of how much pre\u00adDDR community recovery and reconstruction assistance will be necessary to improve the communities\u2019 capacity to absorb former combatants and other returning populations, and list potential links to other, either ongoing or planned, reconstruction and development initiatives.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -47442,14 +47442,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1. Contextual analysis and rationale", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "In addition, the engagement and role of the UN should be specified here; \\n Overview of armed forces and groups: This section should provide an overview of all armed forces and groups and their key characteristics, e.g., force\/group strength, loca\u00ad tion, organization and structure, political affiliations, type of weaponry, etc.", + "Sentence": "In addition, the engagement and role of the UN should be specified here; \n Overview of armed forces and groups: This section should provide an overview of all armed forces and groups and their key characteristics, e.g., force\/group strength, loca\u00ad tion, organization and structure, political affiliations, type of weaponry, etc.", "newParagraph": "ddr programme document based depth understanding national local context situation programme implemented shape objective overall strategy criterion entry follows n general context problem defines problem ddr specific context implemented level violence provision peace accord lack alternative livelihood ex combatant etc focus nature con sequence conflict existing national local capacity ddr ssr broad political social economic characteristic operating environment n rationale justification drawing situation analysis explains need ddr approach suggested appropriate viable response identified problem antecedent problem ie caused problem first place degree political resolution factor provide compelling argument undertaking ddr addition engagement role un specified n overview armed force group section provide overview armed force group key characteristic eg forcegroup strength loca tion organization structure political affiliation type weaponry etc information basis developing specifically designed strategy approach ddr armed force group see annex sample table armed force group n definition participant beneficiary drawing comprehensive assessment profile armed group force level violence normally inclu ded framework section identify armed group force prioritized ddr programme prioritization based involvement potential cause violence otherwise affect security peace process addition subgroup given special attention eg special need group identified n socioeconomic profile area return general overview socio economic condition area community ex combatant return important order define general context reintegration specific strategy ensure effec tive sustainable support overview also provide indication much pre ddr community recovery reconstruction assistance necessary improve community capacity absorb former combatant returning population list potential link either ongoing planned reconstruction development initiative", "ProcessedSent": "addition engagement role un specified n overview armed force group section provide overview armed force group key characteristic eg forcegroup strength loca tion organization structure political affiliation type weaponry etc", "SentID": 2635 }, { "ParagraphID": 852, - "Paragraph": "The DDR programme document should be based on an in\u00addepth understanding of the national or local context and the situation in which the programme is to be implemented, as this will shape the objectives, overall strategy and criteria for entry, as follows: \\n General context and problem: This defines the \u2018problem\u2019 of DDR in the specific context in which it will be implemented (levels of violence, provisions in peace accords, lack of alternative livelihoods for ex\u00adcombatants, etc.), with a focus on the nature and con\u00ad sequences of the conflict; existing national and local capacities for DDR and SSR; and the broad political, social and economic characteristics of the operating environment; \\n Rationale and justification: Drawing from the situation analysis, this explains the need for DDR: why the approach suggested is an appropriate and viable response to the identified problem, the antecedents to the problem (i.e., what caused the problem in the first place) and degree of political will for its resolution; and any other factors that provide a compelling argument for undertaking DDR. In addition, the engagement and role of the UN should be specified here; \\n Overview of armed forces and groups: This section should provide an overview of all armed forces and groups and their key characteristics, e.g., force\/group strength, loca\u00ad tion, organization and structure, political affiliations, type of weaponry, etc. This information should be the basis for developing specifically designed strategies and approaches for the DDR of the armed forces and groups (see Annex D for a sample table of armed forces and groups); \\n Definition of participants and beneficiaries: Drawing on the comprehensive assessments and profiles of armed groups and forces and levels of violence that are normally inclu\u00ad ded in the framework, this section should identify which armed groups and forces should be prioritized for DDR programmes. This prioritization should be based on their involvement in or potential to cause violence, or otherwise affect security and the peace process. In addition, subgroups that should be given special attention (e.g., special needs groups) should be identified; \\n Socio-economic profile in areas of return: A general overview of socio\u00adeconomic conditions in the areas and communities to which ex\u00adcombatants will return is important in order to define both the general context of reintegration and specific strategies to ensure effec\u00ad tive and sustainable support for it. Such an overview can also provide an indication of how much pre\u00adDDR community recovery and reconstruction assistance will be necessary to improve the communities\u2019 capacity to absorb former combatants and other returning populations, and list potential links to other, either ongoing or planned, reconstruction and development initiatives.", + "Paragraph": "The DDR programme document should be based on an in\u00addepth understanding of the national or local context and the situation in which the programme is to be implemented, as this will shape the objectives, overall strategy and criteria for entry, as follows: \n General context and problem: This defines the \u2018problem\u2019 of DDR in the specific context in which it will be implemented (levels of violence, provisions in peace accords, lack of alternative livelihoods for ex\u00adcombatants, etc.), with a focus on the nature and con\u00ad sequences of the conflict; existing national and local capacities for DDR and SSR; and the broad political, social and economic characteristics of the operating environment; \n Rationale and justification: Drawing from the situation analysis, this explains the need for DDR: why the approach suggested is an appropriate and viable response to the identified problem, the antecedents to the problem (i.e., what caused the problem in the first place) and degree of political will for its resolution; and any other factors that provide a compelling argument for undertaking DDR. In addition, the engagement and role of the UN should be specified here; \n Overview of armed forces and groups: This section should provide an overview of all armed forces and groups and their key characteristics, e.g., force\/group strength, loca\u00ad tion, organization and structure, political affiliations, type of weaponry, etc. This information should be the basis for developing specifically designed strategies and approaches for the DDR of the armed forces and groups (see Annex D for a sample table of armed forces and groups); \n Definition of participants and beneficiaries: Drawing on the comprehensive assessments and profiles of armed groups and forces and levels of violence that are normally inclu\u00ad ded in the framework, this section should identify which armed groups and forces should be prioritized for DDR programmes. This prioritization should be based on their involvement in or potential to cause violence, or otherwise affect security and the peace process. In addition, subgroups that should be given special attention (e.g., special needs groups) should be identified; \n Socio-economic profile in areas of return: A general overview of socio\u00adeconomic conditions in the areas and communities to which ex\u00adcombatants will return is important in order to define both the general context of reintegration and specific strategies to ensure effec\u00ad tive and sustainable support for it. Such an overview can also provide an indication of how much pre\u00adDDR community recovery and reconstruction assistance will be necessary to improve the communities\u2019 capacity to absorb former combatants and other returning populations, and list potential links to other, either ongoing or planned, reconstruction and development initiatives.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -47460,14 +47460,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1. Contextual analysis and rationale", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This information should be the basis for developing specifically designed strategies and approaches for the DDR of the armed forces and groups (see Annex D for a sample table of armed forces and groups); \\n Definition of participants and beneficiaries: Drawing on the comprehensive assessments and profiles of armed groups and forces and levels of violence that are normally inclu\u00ad ded in the framework, this section should identify which armed groups and forces should be prioritized for DDR programmes.", + "Sentence": "This information should be the basis for developing specifically designed strategies and approaches for the DDR of the armed forces and groups (see Annex D for a sample table of armed forces and groups); \n Definition of participants and beneficiaries: Drawing on the comprehensive assessments and profiles of armed groups and forces and levels of violence that are normally inclu\u00ad ded in the framework, this section should identify which armed groups and forces should be prioritized for DDR programmes.", "newParagraph": "ddr programme document based depth understanding national local context situation programme implemented shape objective overall strategy criterion entry follows n general context problem defines problem ddr specific context implemented level violence provision peace accord lack alternative livelihood ex combatant etc focus nature con sequence conflict existing national local capacity ddr ssr broad political social economic characteristic operating environment n rationale justification drawing situation analysis explains need ddr approach suggested appropriate viable response identified problem antecedent problem ie caused problem first place degree political resolution factor provide compelling argument undertaking ddr addition engagement role un specified n overview armed force group section provide overview armed force group key characteristic eg forcegroup strength loca tion organization structure political affiliation type weaponry etc information basis developing specifically designed strategy approach ddr armed force group see annex sample table armed force group n definition participant beneficiary drawing comprehensive assessment profile armed group force level violence normally inclu ded framework section identify armed group force prioritized ddr programme prioritization based involvement potential cause violence otherwise affect security peace process addition subgroup given special attention eg special need group identified n socioeconomic profile area return general overview socio economic condition area community ex combatant return important order define general context reintegration specific strategy ensure effec tive sustainable support overview also provide indication much pre ddr community recovery reconstruction assistance necessary improve community capacity absorb former combatant returning population list potential link either ongoing planned reconstruction development initiative", "ProcessedSent": "information basis developing specifically designed strategy approach ddr armed force group see annex sample table armed force group n definition participant beneficiary drawing comprehensive assessment profile armed group force level violence normally inclu ded framework section identify armed group force prioritized ddr programme", "SentID": 2636 }, { "ParagraphID": 852, - "Paragraph": "The DDR programme document should be based on an in\u00addepth understanding of the national or local context and the situation in which the programme is to be implemented, as this will shape the objectives, overall strategy and criteria for entry, as follows: \\n General context and problem: This defines the \u2018problem\u2019 of DDR in the specific context in which it will be implemented (levels of violence, provisions in peace accords, lack of alternative livelihoods for ex\u00adcombatants, etc.), with a focus on the nature and con\u00ad sequences of the conflict; existing national and local capacities for DDR and SSR; and the broad political, social and economic characteristics of the operating environment; \\n Rationale and justification: Drawing from the situation analysis, this explains the need for DDR: why the approach suggested is an appropriate and viable response to the identified problem, the antecedents to the problem (i.e., what caused the problem in the first place) and degree of political will for its resolution; and any other factors that provide a compelling argument for undertaking DDR. In addition, the engagement and role of the UN should be specified here; \\n Overview of armed forces and groups: This section should provide an overview of all armed forces and groups and their key characteristics, e.g., force\/group strength, loca\u00ad tion, organization and structure, political affiliations, type of weaponry, etc. This information should be the basis for developing specifically designed strategies and approaches for the DDR of the armed forces and groups (see Annex D for a sample table of armed forces and groups); \\n Definition of participants and beneficiaries: Drawing on the comprehensive assessments and profiles of armed groups and forces and levels of violence that are normally inclu\u00ad ded in the framework, this section should identify which armed groups and forces should be prioritized for DDR programmes. This prioritization should be based on their involvement in or potential to cause violence, or otherwise affect security and the peace process. In addition, subgroups that should be given special attention (e.g., special needs groups) should be identified; \\n Socio-economic profile in areas of return: A general overview of socio\u00adeconomic conditions in the areas and communities to which ex\u00adcombatants will return is important in order to define both the general context of reintegration and specific strategies to ensure effec\u00ad tive and sustainable support for it. Such an overview can also provide an indication of how much pre\u00adDDR community recovery and reconstruction assistance will be necessary to improve the communities\u2019 capacity to absorb former combatants and other returning populations, and list potential links to other, either ongoing or planned, reconstruction and development initiatives.", + "Paragraph": "The DDR programme document should be based on an in\u00addepth understanding of the national or local context and the situation in which the programme is to be implemented, as this will shape the objectives, overall strategy and criteria for entry, as follows: \n General context and problem: This defines the \u2018problem\u2019 of DDR in the specific context in which it will be implemented (levels of violence, provisions in peace accords, lack of alternative livelihoods for ex\u00adcombatants, etc.), with a focus on the nature and con\u00ad sequences of the conflict; existing national and local capacities for DDR and SSR; and the broad political, social and economic characteristics of the operating environment; \n Rationale and justification: Drawing from the situation analysis, this explains the need for DDR: why the approach suggested is an appropriate and viable response to the identified problem, the antecedents to the problem (i.e., what caused the problem in the first place) and degree of political will for its resolution; and any other factors that provide a compelling argument for undertaking DDR. In addition, the engagement and role of the UN should be specified here; \n Overview of armed forces and groups: This section should provide an overview of all armed forces and groups and their key characteristics, e.g., force\/group strength, loca\u00ad tion, organization and structure, political affiliations, type of weaponry, etc. This information should be the basis for developing specifically designed strategies and approaches for the DDR of the armed forces and groups (see Annex D for a sample table of armed forces and groups); \n Definition of participants and beneficiaries: Drawing on the comprehensive assessments and profiles of armed groups and forces and levels of violence that are normally inclu\u00ad ded in the framework, this section should identify which armed groups and forces should be prioritized for DDR programmes. This prioritization should be based on their involvement in or potential to cause violence, or otherwise affect security and the peace process. In addition, subgroups that should be given special attention (e.g., special needs groups) should be identified; \n Socio-economic profile in areas of return: A general overview of socio\u00adeconomic conditions in the areas and communities to which ex\u00adcombatants will return is important in order to define both the general context of reintegration and specific strategies to ensure effec\u00ad tive and sustainable support for it. Such an overview can also provide an indication of how much pre\u00adDDR community recovery and reconstruction assistance will be necessary to improve the communities\u2019 capacity to absorb former combatants and other returning populations, and list potential links to other, either ongoing or planned, reconstruction and development initiatives.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -47485,7 +47485,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 852, - "Paragraph": "The DDR programme document should be based on an in\u00addepth understanding of the national or local context and the situation in which the programme is to be implemented, as this will shape the objectives, overall strategy and criteria for entry, as follows: \\n General context and problem: This defines the \u2018problem\u2019 of DDR in the specific context in which it will be implemented (levels of violence, provisions in peace accords, lack of alternative livelihoods for ex\u00adcombatants, etc.), with a focus on the nature and con\u00ad sequences of the conflict; existing national and local capacities for DDR and SSR; and the broad political, social and economic characteristics of the operating environment; \\n Rationale and justification: Drawing from the situation analysis, this explains the need for DDR: why the approach suggested is an appropriate and viable response to the identified problem, the antecedents to the problem (i.e., what caused the problem in the first place) and degree of political will for its resolution; and any other factors that provide a compelling argument for undertaking DDR. In addition, the engagement and role of the UN should be specified here; \\n Overview of armed forces and groups: This section should provide an overview of all armed forces and groups and their key characteristics, e.g., force\/group strength, loca\u00ad tion, organization and structure, political affiliations, type of weaponry, etc. This information should be the basis for developing specifically designed strategies and approaches for the DDR of the armed forces and groups (see Annex D for a sample table of armed forces and groups); \\n Definition of participants and beneficiaries: Drawing on the comprehensive assessments and profiles of armed groups and forces and levels of violence that are normally inclu\u00ad ded in the framework, this section should identify which armed groups and forces should be prioritized for DDR programmes. This prioritization should be based on their involvement in or potential to cause violence, or otherwise affect security and the peace process. In addition, subgroups that should be given special attention (e.g., special needs groups) should be identified; \\n Socio-economic profile in areas of return: A general overview of socio\u00adeconomic conditions in the areas and communities to which ex\u00adcombatants will return is important in order to define both the general context of reintegration and specific strategies to ensure effec\u00ad tive and sustainable support for it. Such an overview can also provide an indication of how much pre\u00adDDR community recovery and reconstruction assistance will be necessary to improve the communities\u2019 capacity to absorb former combatants and other returning populations, and list potential links to other, either ongoing or planned, reconstruction and development initiatives.", + "Paragraph": "The DDR programme document should be based on an in\u00addepth understanding of the national or local context and the situation in which the programme is to be implemented, as this will shape the objectives, overall strategy and criteria for entry, as follows: \n General context and problem: This defines the \u2018problem\u2019 of DDR in the specific context in which it will be implemented (levels of violence, provisions in peace accords, lack of alternative livelihoods for ex\u00adcombatants, etc.), with a focus on the nature and con\u00ad sequences of the conflict; existing national and local capacities for DDR and SSR; and the broad political, social and economic characteristics of the operating environment; \n Rationale and justification: Drawing from the situation analysis, this explains the need for DDR: why the approach suggested is an appropriate and viable response to the identified problem, the antecedents to the problem (i.e., what caused the problem in the first place) and degree of political will for its resolution; and any other factors that provide a compelling argument for undertaking DDR. In addition, the engagement and role of the UN should be specified here; \n Overview of armed forces and groups: This section should provide an overview of all armed forces and groups and their key characteristics, e.g., force\/group strength, loca\u00ad tion, organization and structure, political affiliations, type of weaponry, etc. This information should be the basis for developing specifically designed strategies and approaches for the DDR of the armed forces and groups (see Annex D for a sample table of armed forces and groups); \n Definition of participants and beneficiaries: Drawing on the comprehensive assessments and profiles of armed groups and forces and levels of violence that are normally inclu\u00ad ded in the framework, this section should identify which armed groups and forces should be prioritized for DDR programmes. This prioritization should be based on their involvement in or potential to cause violence, or otherwise affect security and the peace process. In addition, subgroups that should be given special attention (e.g., special needs groups) should be identified; \n Socio-economic profile in areas of return: A general overview of socio\u00adeconomic conditions in the areas and communities to which ex\u00adcombatants will return is important in order to define both the general context of reintegration and specific strategies to ensure effec\u00ad tive and sustainable support for it. Such an overview can also provide an indication of how much pre\u00adDDR community recovery and reconstruction assistance will be necessary to improve the communities\u2019 capacity to absorb former combatants and other returning populations, and list potential links to other, either ongoing or planned, reconstruction and development initiatives.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -47496,14 +47496,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1. Contextual analysis and rationale", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "In addition, subgroups that should be given special attention (e.g., special needs groups) should be identified; \\n Socio-economic profile in areas of return: A general overview of socio\u00adeconomic conditions in the areas and communities to which ex\u00adcombatants will return is important in order to define both the general context of reintegration and specific strategies to ensure effec\u00ad tive and sustainable support for it.", + "Sentence": "In addition, subgroups that should be given special attention (e.g., special needs groups) should be identified; \n Socio-economic profile in areas of return: A general overview of socio\u00adeconomic conditions in the areas and communities to which ex\u00adcombatants will return is important in order to define both the general context of reintegration and specific strategies to ensure effec\u00ad tive and sustainable support for it.", "newParagraph": "ddr programme document based depth understanding national local context situation programme implemented shape objective overall strategy criterion entry follows n general context problem defines problem ddr specific context implemented level violence provision peace accord lack alternative livelihood ex combatant etc focus nature con sequence conflict existing national local capacity ddr ssr broad political social economic characteristic operating environment n rationale justification drawing situation analysis explains need ddr approach suggested appropriate viable response identified problem antecedent problem ie caused problem first place degree political resolution factor provide compelling argument undertaking ddr addition engagement role un specified n overview armed force group section provide overview armed force group key characteristic eg forcegroup strength loca tion organization structure political affiliation type weaponry etc information basis developing specifically designed strategy approach ddr armed force group see annex sample table armed force group n definition participant beneficiary drawing comprehensive assessment profile armed group force level violence normally inclu ded framework section identify armed group force prioritized ddr programme prioritization based involvement potential cause violence otherwise affect security peace process addition subgroup given special attention eg special need group identified n socioeconomic profile area return general overview socio economic condition area community ex combatant return important order define general context reintegration specific strategy ensure effec tive sustainable support overview also provide indication much pre ddr community recovery reconstruction assistance necessary improve community capacity absorb former combatant returning population list potential link either ongoing planned reconstruction development initiative", "ProcessedSent": "addition subgroup given special attention eg special need group identified n socioeconomic profile area return general overview socio economic condition area community ex combatant return important order define general context reintegration specific strategy ensure effec tive sustainable support", "SentID": 2638 }, { "ParagraphID": 852, - "Paragraph": "The DDR programme document should be based on an in\u00addepth understanding of the national or local context and the situation in which the programme is to be implemented, as this will shape the objectives, overall strategy and criteria for entry, as follows: \\n General context and problem: This defines the \u2018problem\u2019 of DDR in the specific context in which it will be implemented (levels of violence, provisions in peace accords, lack of alternative livelihoods for ex\u00adcombatants, etc.), with a focus on the nature and con\u00ad sequences of the conflict; existing national and local capacities for DDR and SSR; and the broad political, social and economic characteristics of the operating environment; \\n Rationale and justification: Drawing from the situation analysis, this explains the need for DDR: why the approach suggested is an appropriate and viable response to the identified problem, the antecedents to the problem (i.e., what caused the problem in the first place) and degree of political will for its resolution; and any other factors that provide a compelling argument for undertaking DDR. In addition, the engagement and role of the UN should be specified here; \\n Overview of armed forces and groups: This section should provide an overview of all armed forces and groups and their key characteristics, e.g., force\/group strength, loca\u00ad tion, organization and structure, political affiliations, type of weaponry, etc. This information should be the basis for developing specifically designed strategies and approaches for the DDR of the armed forces and groups (see Annex D for a sample table of armed forces and groups); \\n Definition of participants and beneficiaries: Drawing on the comprehensive assessments and profiles of armed groups and forces and levels of violence that are normally inclu\u00ad ded in the framework, this section should identify which armed groups and forces should be prioritized for DDR programmes. This prioritization should be based on their involvement in or potential to cause violence, or otherwise affect security and the peace process. In addition, subgroups that should be given special attention (e.g., special needs groups) should be identified; \\n Socio-economic profile in areas of return: A general overview of socio\u00adeconomic conditions in the areas and communities to which ex\u00adcombatants will return is important in order to define both the general context of reintegration and specific strategies to ensure effec\u00ad tive and sustainable support for it. Such an overview can also provide an indication of how much pre\u00adDDR community recovery and reconstruction assistance will be necessary to improve the communities\u2019 capacity to absorb former combatants and other returning populations, and list potential links to other, either ongoing or planned, reconstruction and development initiatives.", + "Paragraph": "The DDR programme document should be based on an in\u00addepth understanding of the national or local context and the situation in which the programme is to be implemented, as this will shape the objectives, overall strategy and criteria for entry, as follows: \n General context and problem: This defines the \u2018problem\u2019 of DDR in the specific context in which it will be implemented (levels of violence, provisions in peace accords, lack of alternative livelihoods for ex\u00adcombatants, etc.), with a focus on the nature and con\u00ad sequences of the conflict; existing national and local capacities for DDR and SSR; and the broad political, social and economic characteristics of the operating environment; \n Rationale and justification: Drawing from the situation analysis, this explains the need for DDR: why the approach suggested is an appropriate and viable response to the identified problem, the antecedents to the problem (i.e., what caused the problem in the first place) and degree of political will for its resolution; and any other factors that provide a compelling argument for undertaking DDR. In addition, the engagement and role of the UN should be specified here; \n Overview of armed forces and groups: This section should provide an overview of all armed forces and groups and their key characteristics, e.g., force\/group strength, loca\u00ad tion, organization and structure, political affiliations, type of weaponry, etc. This information should be the basis for developing specifically designed strategies and approaches for the DDR of the armed forces and groups (see Annex D for a sample table of armed forces and groups); \n Definition of participants and beneficiaries: Drawing on the comprehensive assessments and profiles of armed groups and forces and levels of violence that are normally inclu\u00ad ded in the framework, this section should identify which armed groups and forces should be prioritized for DDR programmes. This prioritization should be based on their involvement in or potential to cause violence, or otherwise affect security and the peace process. In addition, subgroups that should be given special attention (e.g., special needs groups) should be identified; \n Socio-economic profile in areas of return: A general overview of socio\u00adeconomic conditions in the areas and communities to which ex\u00adcombatants will return is important in order to define both the general context of reintegration and specific strategies to ensure effec\u00ad tive and sustainable support for it. Such an overview can also provide an indication of how much pre\u00adDDR community recovery and reconstruction assistance will be necessary to improve the communities\u2019 capacity to absorb former combatants and other returning populations, and list potential links to other, either ongoing or planned, reconstruction and development initiatives.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -47575,7 +47575,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 854, - "Paragraph": "Example: Objectives of the national DDR programme in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) \\n General objective: Contribute to the consolidation of peace, national reconciliation and the socio\u00adeconomic reconstruction of the country, as well as regional stability.", + "Paragraph": "Example: Objectives of the national DDR programme in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) \n General objective: Contribute to the consolidation of peace, national reconciliation and the socio\u00adeconomic reconstruction of the country, as well as regional stability.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -47586,14 +47586,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.2. DDR programme objectives", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Example: Objectives of the national DDR programme in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) \\n General objective: Contribute to the consolidation of peace, national reconciliation and the socio\u00adeconomic reconstruction of the country, as well as regional stability.", + "Sentence": "Example: Objectives of the national DDR programme in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) \n General objective: Contribute to the consolidation of peace, national reconciliation and the socio\u00adeconomic reconstruction of the country, as well as regional stability.", "newParagraph": "example objective national ddr programme democratic republic congo drc n general objective contribute consolidation peace national reconciliation socio economic reconstruction country well regional stability", "ProcessedSent": "example objective national ddr programme democratic republic congo drc n general objective contribute consolidation peace national reconciliation socio economic reconstruction country well regional stability", "SentID": 2643 }, { "ParagraphID": 855, - "Paragraph": "Specific objectives: \\n Disarm combatants belonging to the armed groups and forces that will not be integrated into the DRC armed forces or in the police, as foreseen in the DRC peace accords; \\n Demobilize the military elements and armed groups not eligible for integration into the DRC armed forces; \\n Reintegrate demobilized elements into social and economic life within the framework of community productive systems.", + "Paragraph": "Specific objectives: \n Disarm combatants belonging to the armed groups and forces that will not be integrated into the DRC armed forces or in the police, as foreseen in the DRC peace accords; \n Demobilize the military elements and armed groups not eligible for integration into the DRC armed forces; \n Reintegrate demobilized elements into social and economic life within the framework of community productive systems.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -47604,7 +47604,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.2. DDR programme objectives", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Specific objectives: \\n Disarm combatants belonging to the armed groups and forces that will not be integrated into the DRC armed forces or in the police, as foreseen in the DRC peace accords; \\n Demobilize the military elements and armed groups not eligible for integration into the DRC armed forces; \\n Reintegrate demobilized elements into social and economic life within the framework of community productive systems.", + "Sentence": "Specific objectives: \n Disarm combatants belonging to the armed groups and forces that will not be integrated into the DRC armed forces or in the police, as foreseen in the DRC peace accords; \n Demobilize the military elements and armed groups not eligible for integration into the DRC armed forces; \n Reintegrate demobilized elements into social and economic life within the framework of community productive systems.", "newParagraph": "specific objective n disarm combatant belonging armed group force integrated drc armed force police foreseen drc peace accord n demobilize military element armed group eligible integration drc armed force n reintegrate demobilized element social economic life within framework community productive system", "ProcessedSent": "specific objective n disarm combatant belonging armed group force integrated drc armed force police foreseen drc peace accord n demobilize military element armed group eligible integration drc armed force n reintegrate demobilized element social economic life within framework community productive system", "SentID": 2644 @@ -47755,7 +47755,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 858, - "Paragraph": "Example: Preconditions and foundations for DDR in Liberia \\n A government\u00addriven process of post\u00adconflict reconciliation is developed and imple\u00ad mented in order to shape and define the framework for post\u00adconflict rehabilitation and reintegration measures; \\n A National Transitional Government is established to run the affairs of the country up until 2006, when a democratically elected government will take office; \\n Comprehensive measures to stem and control the influx and possible recycling of weapons by all armed forces and groups and their regional network of contacts are put in place; \\n The process of disbandment of armed groups and restructuring of the Liberian security forces is organized and begun; \\n A comprehensive national recovery programme and a programme for community reconstruction, rehabilitation and reintegration are simultaneously developed and implemented by the government, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and other UN agencies as a strategy of pre\u00adpositioning and providing assistance to all war\u00adaffected communities, refugees and internally displaced persons (IDPs). This programme will provide the essential drive and broader framework for the post\u00adwar recovery effort; \\n Other complementary political provisions in the peace agreement are initiated and implemented in support of the overall peace process; \\n A complementary community arms collection programme, supported with legislative process outlawing the possession of arms in Liberia, would be started and enforced following the completion of formal disarmament process.", + "Paragraph": "Example: Preconditions and foundations for DDR in Liberia \n A government\u00addriven process of post\u00adconflict reconciliation is developed and imple\u00ad mented in order to shape and define the framework for post\u00adconflict rehabilitation and reintegration measures; \n A National Transitional Government is established to run the affairs of the country up until 2006, when a democratically elected government will take office; \n Comprehensive measures to stem and control the influx and possible recycling of weapons by all armed forces and groups and their regional network of contacts are put in place; \n The process of disbandment of armed groups and restructuring of the Liberian security forces is organized and begun; \n A comprehensive national recovery programme and a programme for community reconstruction, rehabilitation and reintegration are simultaneously developed and implemented by the government, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and other UN agencies as a strategy of pre\u00adpositioning and providing assistance to all war\u00adaffected communities, refugees and internally displaced persons (IDPs). This programme will provide the essential drive and broader framework for the post\u00adwar recovery effort; \n Other complementary political provisions in the peace agreement are initiated and implemented in support of the overall peace process; \n A complementary community arms collection programme, supported with legislative process outlawing the possession of arms in Liberia, would be started and enforced following the completion of formal disarmament process.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -47766,14 +47766,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.4. Preconditions and foundations for DDR", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Example: Preconditions and foundations for DDR in Liberia \\n A government\u00addriven process of post\u00adconflict reconciliation is developed and imple\u00ad mented in order to shape and define the framework for post\u00adconflict rehabilitation and reintegration measures; \\n A National Transitional Government is established to run the affairs of the country up until 2006, when a democratically elected government will take office; \\n Comprehensive measures to stem and control the influx and possible recycling of weapons by all armed forces and groups and their regional network of contacts are put in place; \\n The process of disbandment of armed groups and restructuring of the Liberian security forces is organized and begun; \\n A comprehensive national recovery programme and a programme for community reconstruction, rehabilitation and reintegration are simultaneously developed and implemented by the government, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and other UN agencies as a strategy of pre\u00adpositioning and providing assistance to all war\u00adaffected communities, refugees and internally displaced persons (IDPs).", + "Sentence": "Example: Preconditions and foundations for DDR in Liberia \n A government\u00addriven process of post\u00adconflict reconciliation is developed and imple\u00ad mented in order to shape and define the framework for post\u00adconflict rehabilitation and reintegration measures; \n A National Transitional Government is established to run the affairs of the country up until 2006, when a democratically elected government will take office; \n Comprehensive measures to stem and control the influx and possible recycling of weapons by all armed forces and groups and their regional network of contacts are put in place; \n The process of disbandment of armed groups and restructuring of the Liberian security forces is organized and begun; \n A comprehensive national recovery programme and a programme for community reconstruction, rehabilitation and reintegration are simultaneously developed and implemented by the government, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and other UN agencies as a strategy of pre\u00adpositioning and providing assistance to all war\u00adaffected communities, refugees and internally displaced persons (IDPs).", "newParagraph": "example precondition foundation ddr liberia n government driven process post conflict reconciliation developed imple mented order shape define framework post conflict rehabilitation reintegration measure n national transitional government established run affair country 2006 democratically elected government take office n comprehensive measure stem control influx possible recycling weapon armed force group regional network contact put place n process disbandment armed group restructuring liberian security force organized begun n comprehensive national recovery programme programme community reconstruction rehabilitation reintegration simultaneously developed implemented government united nation development programme undp un agency strategy pre positioning providing assistance war affected community refugee internally displaced person idp programme provide essential drive broader framework post war recovery effort n complementary political provision peace agreement initiated implemented support overall peace process n complementary community arm collection programme supported legislative process outlawing possession arm liberia would started enforced following completion formal disarmament process", "ProcessedSent": "example precondition foundation ddr liberia n government driven process post conflict reconciliation developed imple mented order shape define framework post conflict rehabilitation reintegration measure n national transitional government established run affair country 2006 democratically elected government take office n comprehensive measure stem control influx possible recycling weapon armed force group regional network contact put place n process disbandment armed group restructuring liberian security force organized begun n comprehensive national recovery programme programme community reconstruction rehabilitation reintegration simultaneously developed implemented government united nation development programme undp un agency strategy pre positioning providing assistance war affected community refugee internally displaced person idp", "SentID": 2653 }, { "ParagraphID": 858, - "Paragraph": "Example: Preconditions and foundations for DDR in Liberia \\n A government\u00addriven process of post\u00adconflict reconciliation is developed and imple\u00ad mented in order to shape and define the framework for post\u00adconflict rehabilitation and reintegration measures; \\n A National Transitional Government is established to run the affairs of the country up until 2006, when a democratically elected government will take office; \\n Comprehensive measures to stem and control the influx and possible recycling of weapons by all armed forces and groups and their regional network of contacts are put in place; \\n The process of disbandment of armed groups and restructuring of the Liberian security forces is organized and begun; \\n A comprehensive national recovery programme and a programme for community reconstruction, rehabilitation and reintegration are simultaneously developed and implemented by the government, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and other UN agencies as a strategy of pre\u00adpositioning and providing assistance to all war\u00adaffected communities, refugees and internally displaced persons (IDPs). This programme will provide the essential drive and broader framework for the post\u00adwar recovery effort; \\n Other complementary political provisions in the peace agreement are initiated and implemented in support of the overall peace process; \\n A complementary community arms collection programme, supported with legislative process outlawing the possession of arms in Liberia, would be started and enforced following the completion of formal disarmament process.", + "Paragraph": "Example: Preconditions and foundations for DDR in Liberia \n A government\u00addriven process of post\u00adconflict reconciliation is developed and imple\u00ad mented in order to shape and define the framework for post\u00adconflict rehabilitation and reintegration measures; \n A National Transitional Government is established to run the affairs of the country up until 2006, when a democratically elected government will take office; \n Comprehensive measures to stem and control the influx and possible recycling of weapons by all armed forces and groups and their regional network of contacts are put in place; \n The process of disbandment of armed groups and restructuring of the Liberian security forces is organized and begun; \n A comprehensive national recovery programme and a programme for community reconstruction, rehabilitation and reintegration are simultaneously developed and implemented by the government, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and other UN agencies as a strategy of pre\u00adpositioning and providing assistance to all war\u00adaffected communities, refugees and internally displaced persons (IDPs). This programme will provide the essential drive and broader framework for the post\u00adwar recovery effort; \n Other complementary political provisions in the peace agreement are initiated and implemented in support of the overall peace process; \n A complementary community arms collection programme, supported with legislative process outlawing the possession of arms in Liberia, would be started and enforced following the completion of formal disarmament process.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -47784,14 +47784,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.4. Preconditions and foundations for DDR", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This programme will provide the essential drive and broader framework for the post\u00adwar recovery effort; \\n Other complementary political provisions in the peace agreement are initiated and implemented in support of the overall peace process; \\n A complementary community arms collection programme, supported with legislative process outlawing the possession of arms in Liberia, would be started and enforced following the completion of formal disarmament process.", + "Sentence": "This programme will provide the essential drive and broader framework for the post\u00adwar recovery effort; \n Other complementary political provisions in the peace agreement are initiated and implemented in support of the overall peace process; \n A complementary community arms collection programme, supported with legislative process outlawing the possession of arms in Liberia, would be started and enforced following the completion of formal disarmament process.", "newParagraph": "example precondition foundation ddr liberia n government driven process post conflict reconciliation developed imple mented order shape define framework post conflict rehabilitation reintegration measure n national transitional government established run affair country 2006 democratically elected government take office n comprehensive measure stem control influx possible recycling weapon armed force group regional network contact put place n process disbandment armed group restructuring liberian security force organized begun n comprehensive national recovery programme programme community reconstruction rehabilitation reintegration simultaneously developed implemented government united nation development programme undp un agency strategy pre positioning providing assistance war affected community refugee internally displaced person idp programme provide essential drive broader framework post war recovery effort n complementary political provision peace agreement initiated implemented support overall peace process n complementary community arm collection programme supported legislative process outlawing possession arm liberia would started enforced following completion formal disarmament process", "ProcessedSent": "programme provide essential drive broader framework post war recovery effort n complementary political provision peace agreement initiated implemented support overall peace process n complementary community arm collection programme supported legislative process outlawing possession arm liberia would started enforced following completion formal disarmament process", "SentID": 2654 }, { "ParagraphID": 859, - "Paragraph": "While the objectives, principles and preconditions\/foundations establish the overall design and structure of the DDR programme, a description of the overall strategic approach is essential in order to explain how DDR will be implemented. This section is essential in order to: \\n explain how the multiple components of DDR will be designed to reflect realities and needs, thus ensuring efficiency, effectiveness and sustainability of the overall approach; \\n explain how the targets for assisting DDR participants and beneficiaries (number of ex\u00adcombatants assisted, etc.) will be met; \\n explain how the various components and activities of DDR will be divided into phases and sequenced (planned over time) within the programme time\u00adframe; \\n identify issues that are critical to the implementation of the overall programme and provide information on how they will be dealt with.", + "Paragraph": "While the objectives, principles and preconditions\/foundations establish the overall design and structure of the DDR programme, a description of the overall strategic approach is essential in order to explain how DDR will be implemented. This section is essential in order to: \n explain how the multiple components of DDR will be designed to reflect realities and needs, thus ensuring efficiency, effectiveness and sustainability of the overall approach; \n explain how the targets for assisting DDR participants and beneficiaries (number of ex\u00adcombatants assisted, etc.) will be met; \n explain how the various components and activities of DDR will be divided into phases and sequenced (planned over time) within the programme time\u00adframe; \n identify issues that are critical to the implementation of the overall programme and provide information on how they will be dealt with.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -47809,7 +47809,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 859, - "Paragraph": "While the objectives, principles and preconditions\/foundations establish the overall design and structure of the DDR programme, a description of the overall strategic approach is essential in order to explain how DDR will be implemented. This section is essential in order to: \\n explain how the multiple components of DDR will be designed to reflect realities and needs, thus ensuring efficiency, effectiveness and sustainability of the overall approach; \\n explain how the targets for assisting DDR participants and beneficiaries (number of ex\u00adcombatants assisted, etc.) will be met; \\n explain how the various components and activities of DDR will be divided into phases and sequenced (planned over time) within the programme time\u00adframe; \\n identify issues that are critical to the implementation of the overall programme and provide information on how they will be dealt with.", + "Paragraph": "While the objectives, principles and preconditions\/foundations establish the overall design and structure of the DDR programme, a description of the overall strategic approach is essential in order to explain how DDR will be implemented. This section is essential in order to: \n explain how the multiple components of DDR will be designed to reflect realities and needs, thus ensuring efficiency, effectiveness and sustainability of the overall approach; \n explain how the targets for assisting DDR participants and beneficiaries (number of ex\u00adcombatants assisted, etc.) will be met; \n explain how the various components and activities of DDR will be divided into phases and sequenced (planned over time) within the programme time\u00adframe; \n identify issues that are critical to the implementation of the overall programme and provide information on how they will be dealt with.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -47820,14 +47820,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.5. Overall strategic approach to DDR", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This section is essential in order to: \\n explain how the multiple components of DDR will be designed to reflect realities and needs, thus ensuring efficiency, effectiveness and sustainability of the overall approach; \\n explain how the targets for assisting DDR participants and beneficiaries (number of ex\u00adcombatants assisted, etc.)", + "Sentence": "This section is essential in order to: \n explain how the multiple components of DDR will be designed to reflect realities and needs, thus ensuring efficiency, effectiveness and sustainability of the overall approach; \n explain how the targets for assisting DDR participants and beneficiaries (number of ex\u00adcombatants assisted, etc.)", "newParagraph": "objective principle preconditionsfoundations establish overall design structure ddr programme description overall strategic approach essential order explain ddr implemented section essential order n explain multiple component ddr designed reflect reality need thus ensuring efficiency effectiveness sustainability overall approach n explain target assisting ddr participant beneficiary number ex combatant assisted etc met n explain various component activity ddr divided phase sequenced planned time within programme time frame n identify issue critical implementation overall programme provide information dealt", "ProcessedSent": "section essential order n explain multiple component ddr designed reflect reality need thus ensuring efficiency effectiveness sustainability overall approach n explain target assisting ddr participant beneficiary number ex combatant assisted etc", "SentID": 2656 }, { "ParagraphID": 859, - "Paragraph": "While the objectives, principles and preconditions\/foundations establish the overall design and structure of the DDR programme, a description of the overall strategic approach is essential in order to explain how DDR will be implemented. This section is essential in order to: \\n explain how the multiple components of DDR will be designed to reflect realities and needs, thus ensuring efficiency, effectiveness and sustainability of the overall approach; \\n explain how the targets for assisting DDR participants and beneficiaries (number of ex\u00adcombatants assisted, etc.) will be met; \\n explain how the various components and activities of DDR will be divided into phases and sequenced (planned over time) within the programme time\u00adframe; \\n identify issues that are critical to the implementation of the overall programme and provide information on how they will be dealt with.", + "Paragraph": "While the objectives, principles and preconditions\/foundations establish the overall design and structure of the DDR programme, a description of the overall strategic approach is essential in order to explain how DDR will be implemented. This section is essential in order to: \n explain how the multiple components of DDR will be designed to reflect realities and needs, thus ensuring efficiency, effectiveness and sustainability of the overall approach; \n explain how the targets for assisting DDR participants and beneficiaries (number of ex\u00adcombatants assisted, etc.) will be met; \n explain how the various components and activities of DDR will be divided into phases and sequenced (planned over time) within the programme time\u00adframe; \n identify issues that are critical to the implementation of the overall programme and provide information on how they will be dealt with.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -47838,7 +47838,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.5. Overall strategic approach to DDR", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "will be met; \\n explain how the various components and activities of DDR will be divided into phases and sequenced (planned over time) within the programme time\u00adframe; \\n identify issues that are critical to the implementation of the overall programme and provide information on how they will be dealt with.", + "Sentence": "will be met; \n explain how the various components and activities of DDR will be divided into phases and sequenced (planned over time) within the programme time\u00adframe; \n identify issues that are critical to the implementation of the overall programme and provide information on how they will be dealt with.", "newParagraph": "objective principle preconditionsfoundations establish overall design structure ddr programme description overall strategic approach essential order explain ddr implemented section essential order n explain multiple component ddr designed reflect reality need thus ensuring efficiency effectiveness sustainability overall approach n explain target assisting ddr participant beneficiary number ex combatant assisted etc met n explain various component activity ddr divided phase sequenced planned time within programme time frame n identify issue critical implementation overall programme provide information dealt", "ProcessedSent": "met n explain various component activity ddr divided phase sequenced planned time within programme time frame n identify issue critical implementation overall programme provide information dealt", "SentID": 2657 @@ -47935,7 +47935,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 861, - "Paragraph": "The specific context in which a DDR programme is to be implemented, the programme requirements and the best way to reach the defined objectives will all affect the way in which a DDR operation is conceptualized. When developing a DDR concept, there is a need to: describe the overall strategic approach; justify why this approach was chosen; describe the activities that the programme will carry out; and lay out the broad operational methods or guidelines for implementing them. In general, there are three strategic approaches that can be taken (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization): \\n DDR of conventional armed forces, involving the structured and centralized disarma\u00ad ment and demobilization of formed units in assembly or cantonment areas. This is often linked to their restructuring as part of an SSR process; \\n DDR of armed groups, involving a decentralized demobilization process in which indi\u00ad viduals are identified, registered and processed; incentives are provided for voluntary disarmament; and reintegration assistance schemes are integrated with broader com\u00ad munity\u00adbased recovery and reconstruction projects; \\n A \u2018mixed\u2019 DDR approach, combining both of the above models, used when participant groups include both armed forces and armed groups;", + "Paragraph": "The specific context in which a DDR programme is to be implemented, the programme requirements and the best way to reach the defined objectives will all affect the way in which a DDR operation is conceptualized. When developing a DDR concept, there is a need to: describe the overall strategic approach; justify why this approach was chosen; describe the activities that the programme will carry out; and lay out the broad operational methods or guidelines for implementing them. In general, there are three strategic approaches that can be taken (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization): \n DDR of conventional armed forces, involving the structured and centralized disarma\u00ad ment and demobilization of formed units in assembly or cantonment areas. This is often linked to their restructuring as part of an SSR process; \n DDR of armed groups, involving a decentralized demobilization process in which indi\u00ad viduals are identified, registered and processed; incentives are provided for voluntary disarmament; and reintegration assistance schemes are integrated with broader com\u00ad munity\u00adbased recovery and reconstruction projects; \n A \u2018mixed\u2019 DDR approach, combining both of the above models, used when participant groups include both armed forces and armed groups;", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -47953,7 +47953,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 861, - "Paragraph": "The specific context in which a DDR programme is to be implemented, the programme requirements and the best way to reach the defined objectives will all affect the way in which a DDR operation is conceptualized. When developing a DDR concept, there is a need to: describe the overall strategic approach; justify why this approach was chosen; describe the activities that the programme will carry out; and lay out the broad operational methods or guidelines for implementing them. In general, there are three strategic approaches that can be taken (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization): \\n DDR of conventional armed forces, involving the structured and centralized disarma\u00ad ment and demobilization of formed units in assembly or cantonment areas. This is often linked to their restructuring as part of an SSR process; \\n DDR of armed groups, involving a decentralized demobilization process in which indi\u00ad viduals are identified, registered and processed; incentives are provided for voluntary disarmament; and reintegration assistance schemes are integrated with broader com\u00ad munity\u00adbased recovery and reconstruction projects; \\n A \u2018mixed\u2019 DDR approach, combining both of the above models, used when participant groups include both armed forces and armed groups;", + "Paragraph": "The specific context in which a DDR programme is to be implemented, the programme requirements and the best way to reach the defined objectives will all affect the way in which a DDR operation is conceptualized. When developing a DDR concept, there is a need to: describe the overall strategic approach; justify why this approach was chosen; describe the activities that the programme will carry out; and lay out the broad operational methods or guidelines for implementing them. In general, there are three strategic approaches that can be taken (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization): \n DDR of conventional armed forces, involving the structured and centralized disarma\u00ad ment and demobilization of formed units in assembly or cantonment areas. This is often linked to their restructuring as part of an SSR process; \n DDR of armed groups, involving a decentralized demobilization process in which indi\u00ad viduals are identified, registered and processed; incentives are provided for voluntary disarmament; and reintegration assistance schemes are integrated with broader com\u00ad munity\u00adbased recovery and reconstruction projects; \n A \u2018mixed\u2019 DDR approach, combining both of the above models, used when participant groups include both armed forces and armed groups;", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -47971,7 +47971,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 861, - "Paragraph": "The specific context in which a DDR programme is to be implemented, the programme requirements and the best way to reach the defined objectives will all affect the way in which a DDR operation is conceptualized. When developing a DDR concept, there is a need to: describe the overall strategic approach; justify why this approach was chosen; describe the activities that the programme will carry out; and lay out the broad operational methods or guidelines for implementing them. In general, there are three strategic approaches that can be taken (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization): \\n DDR of conventional armed forces, involving the structured and centralized disarma\u00ad ment and demobilization of formed units in assembly or cantonment areas. This is often linked to their restructuring as part of an SSR process; \\n DDR of armed groups, involving a decentralized demobilization process in which indi\u00ad viduals are identified, registered and processed; incentives are provided for voluntary disarmament; and reintegration assistance schemes are integrated with broader com\u00ad munity\u00adbased recovery and reconstruction projects; \\n A \u2018mixed\u2019 DDR approach, combining both of the above models, used when participant groups include both armed forces and armed groups;", + "Paragraph": "The specific context in which a DDR programme is to be implemented, the programme requirements and the best way to reach the defined objectives will all affect the way in which a DDR operation is conceptualized. When developing a DDR concept, there is a need to: describe the overall strategic approach; justify why this approach was chosen; describe the activities that the programme will carry out; and lay out the broad operational methods or guidelines for implementing them. In general, there are three strategic approaches that can be taken (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization): \n DDR of conventional armed forces, involving the structured and centralized disarma\u00ad ment and demobilization of formed units in assembly or cantonment areas. This is often linked to their restructuring as part of an SSR process; \n DDR of armed groups, involving a decentralized demobilization process in which indi\u00ad viduals are identified, registered and processed; incentives are provided for voluntary disarmament; and reintegration assistance schemes are integrated with broader com\u00ad munity\u00adbased recovery and reconstruction projects; \n A \u2018mixed\u2019 DDR approach, combining both of the above models, used when participant groups include both armed forces and armed groups;", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -47982,14 +47982,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.5. Overall strategic approach to DDR", "Heading3": "6.5.1. Defining the approach to DDR", "Heading4": "6.5.1.1. Putting DDR into operation", - "Sentence": "In general, there are three strategic approaches that can be taken (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization): \\n DDR of conventional armed forces, involving the structured and centralized disarma\u00ad ment and demobilization of formed units in assembly or cantonment areas.", + "Sentence": "In general, there are three strategic approaches that can be taken (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization): \n DDR of conventional armed forces, involving the structured and centralized disarma\u00ad ment and demobilization of formed units in assembly or cantonment areas.", "newParagraph": "specific context ddr programme implemented programme requirement best way reach defined objective affect way ddr operation conceptualized developing ddr concept need describe overall strategic approach justify approach chosen describe activity programme carry lay broad operational method guideline implementing general three strategic approach taken also see iddrs 420 demobilization n ddr conventional armed force involving structured centralized disarma ment demobilization formed unit assembly cantonment area often linked restructuring part ssr process n ddr armed group involving decentralized demobilization process indi viduals identified registered processed incentive provided voluntary disarmament reintegration assistance scheme integrated broader com munity based recovery reconstruction project n mixed ddr approach combining model used participant group include armed force armed group", "ProcessedSent": "general three strategic approach taken also see iddrs 420 demobilization n ddr conventional armed force involving structured centralized disarma ment demobilization formed unit assembly cantonment area", "SentID": 2665 }, { "ParagraphID": 861, - "Paragraph": "The specific context in which a DDR programme is to be implemented, the programme requirements and the best way to reach the defined objectives will all affect the way in which a DDR operation is conceptualized. When developing a DDR concept, there is a need to: describe the overall strategic approach; justify why this approach was chosen; describe the activities that the programme will carry out; and lay out the broad operational methods or guidelines for implementing them. In general, there are three strategic approaches that can be taken (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization): \\n DDR of conventional armed forces, involving the structured and centralized disarma\u00ad ment and demobilization of formed units in assembly or cantonment areas. This is often linked to their restructuring as part of an SSR process; \\n DDR of armed groups, involving a decentralized demobilization process in which indi\u00ad viduals are identified, registered and processed; incentives are provided for voluntary disarmament; and reintegration assistance schemes are integrated with broader com\u00ad munity\u00adbased recovery and reconstruction projects; \\n A \u2018mixed\u2019 DDR approach, combining both of the above models, used when participant groups include both armed forces and armed groups;", + "Paragraph": "The specific context in which a DDR programme is to be implemented, the programme requirements and the best way to reach the defined objectives will all affect the way in which a DDR operation is conceptualized. When developing a DDR concept, there is a need to: describe the overall strategic approach; justify why this approach was chosen; describe the activities that the programme will carry out; and lay out the broad operational methods or guidelines for implementing them. In general, there are three strategic approaches that can be taken (also see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization): \n DDR of conventional armed forces, involving the structured and centralized disarma\u00ad ment and demobilization of formed units in assembly or cantonment areas. This is often linked to their restructuring as part of an SSR process; \n DDR of armed groups, involving a decentralized demobilization process in which indi\u00ad viduals are identified, registered and processed; incentives are provided for voluntary disarmament; and reintegration assistance schemes are integrated with broader com\u00ad munity\u00adbased recovery and reconstruction projects; \n A \u2018mixed\u2019 DDR approach, combining both of the above models, used when participant groups include both armed forces and armed groups;", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -48000,14 +48000,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.5. Overall strategic approach to DDR", "Heading3": "6.5.1. Defining the approach to DDR", "Heading4": "6.5.1.1. Putting DDR into operation", - "Sentence": "This is often linked to their restructuring as part of an SSR process; \\n DDR of armed groups, involving a decentralized demobilization process in which indi\u00ad viduals are identified, registered and processed; incentives are provided for voluntary disarmament; and reintegration assistance schemes are integrated with broader com\u00ad munity\u00adbased recovery and reconstruction projects; \\n A \u2018mixed\u2019 DDR approach, combining both of the above models, used when participant groups include both armed forces and armed groups;", + "Sentence": "This is often linked to their restructuring as part of an SSR process; \n DDR of armed groups, involving a decentralized demobilization process in which indi\u00ad viduals are identified, registered and processed; incentives are provided for voluntary disarmament; and reintegration assistance schemes are integrated with broader com\u00ad munity\u00adbased recovery and reconstruction projects; \n A \u2018mixed\u2019 DDR approach, combining both of the above models, used when participant groups include both armed forces and armed groups;", "newParagraph": "specific context ddr programme implemented programme requirement best way reach defined objective affect way ddr operation conceptualized developing ddr concept need describe overall strategic approach justify approach chosen describe activity programme carry lay broad operational method guideline implementing general three strategic approach taken also see iddrs 420 demobilization n ddr conventional armed force involving structured centralized disarma ment demobilization formed unit assembly cantonment area often linked restructuring part ssr process n ddr armed group involving decentralized demobilization process indi viduals identified registered processed incentive provided voluntary disarmament reintegration assistance scheme integrated broader com munity based recovery reconstruction project n mixed ddr approach combining model used participant group include armed force armed group", "ProcessedSent": "often linked restructuring part ssr process n ddr armed group involving decentralized demobilization process indi viduals identified registered processed incentive provided voluntary disarmament reintegration assistance scheme integrated broader com munity based recovery reconstruction project n mixed ddr approach combining model used participant group include armed force armed group", "SentID": 2666 }, { "ParagraphID": 862, - "Paragraph": "After a comprehensive assessment of the operational guidelines according to which DDR will be implemented, a model should be created as a basis for planning (see Annexes C and D. Annex E illustrates an approach taken to DDR in the DRC). In addition to defining how to operationalize the core components of DDR, the overall strategic approach should also describe any other components necessary for an effective and viable DDR process. For the most part, these will be activities that will take throughout the DDR programme and ensure the effectiveness of core DDR components. Some examples are: \\n awareness\u00adraising and sensitization (in order to increase local understanding of, and participation in, DDR processes); \\n capacity development for national institutions and communities (in contexts where capacities are weak or non\u00adexistent); \\n weapons control and management (in contexts involving widespread availability of weapons in society); \\n repatriation and resettlement (in contexts of massive internal and cross\u00adborder dis\u00ad placement); \\n local peace\u00adbuilding and reconciliation (in contexts of deep social\/ethnic conflict).", + "Paragraph": "After a comprehensive assessment of the operational guidelines according to which DDR will be implemented, a model should be created as a basis for planning (see Annexes C and D. Annex E illustrates an approach taken to DDR in the DRC). In addition to defining how to operationalize the core components of DDR, the overall strategic approach should also describe any other components necessary for an effective and viable DDR process. For the most part, these will be activities that will take throughout the DDR programme and ensure the effectiveness of core DDR components. Some examples are: \n awareness\u00adraising and sensitization (in order to increase local understanding of, and participation in, DDR processes); \n capacity development for national institutions and communities (in contexts where capacities are weak or non\u00adexistent); \n weapons control and management (in contexts involving widespread availability of weapons in society); \n repatriation and resettlement (in contexts of massive internal and cross\u00adborder dis\u00ad placement); \n local peace\u00adbuilding and reconciliation (in contexts of deep social\/ethnic conflict).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -48025,7 +48025,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 862, - "Paragraph": "After a comprehensive assessment of the operational guidelines according to which DDR will be implemented, a model should be created as a basis for planning (see Annexes C and D. Annex E illustrates an approach taken to DDR in the DRC). In addition to defining how to operationalize the core components of DDR, the overall strategic approach should also describe any other components necessary for an effective and viable DDR process. For the most part, these will be activities that will take throughout the DDR programme and ensure the effectiveness of core DDR components. Some examples are: \\n awareness\u00adraising and sensitization (in order to increase local understanding of, and participation in, DDR processes); \\n capacity development for national institutions and communities (in contexts where capacities are weak or non\u00adexistent); \\n weapons control and management (in contexts involving widespread availability of weapons in society); \\n repatriation and resettlement (in contexts of massive internal and cross\u00adborder dis\u00ad placement); \\n local peace\u00adbuilding and reconciliation (in contexts of deep social\/ethnic conflict).", + "Paragraph": "After a comprehensive assessment of the operational guidelines according to which DDR will be implemented, a model should be created as a basis for planning (see Annexes C and D. Annex E illustrates an approach taken to DDR in the DRC). In addition to defining how to operationalize the core components of DDR, the overall strategic approach should also describe any other components necessary for an effective and viable DDR process. For the most part, these will be activities that will take throughout the DDR programme and ensure the effectiveness of core DDR components. Some examples are: \n awareness\u00adraising and sensitization (in order to increase local understanding of, and participation in, DDR processes); \n capacity development for national institutions and communities (in contexts where capacities are weak or non\u00adexistent); \n weapons control and management (in contexts involving widespread availability of weapons in society); \n repatriation and resettlement (in contexts of massive internal and cross\u00adborder dis\u00ad placement); \n local peace\u00adbuilding and reconciliation (in contexts of deep social\/ethnic conflict).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -48043,7 +48043,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 862, - "Paragraph": "After a comprehensive assessment of the operational guidelines according to which DDR will be implemented, a model should be created as a basis for planning (see Annexes C and D. Annex E illustrates an approach taken to DDR in the DRC). In addition to defining how to operationalize the core components of DDR, the overall strategic approach should also describe any other components necessary for an effective and viable DDR process. For the most part, these will be activities that will take throughout the DDR programme and ensure the effectiveness of core DDR components. Some examples are: \\n awareness\u00adraising and sensitization (in order to increase local understanding of, and participation in, DDR processes); \\n capacity development for national institutions and communities (in contexts where capacities are weak or non\u00adexistent); \\n weapons control and management (in contexts involving widespread availability of weapons in society); \\n repatriation and resettlement (in contexts of massive internal and cross\u00adborder dis\u00ad placement); \\n local peace\u00adbuilding and reconciliation (in contexts of deep social\/ethnic conflict).", + "Paragraph": "After a comprehensive assessment of the operational guidelines according to which DDR will be implemented, a model should be created as a basis for planning (see Annexes C and D. Annex E illustrates an approach taken to DDR in the DRC). In addition to defining how to operationalize the core components of DDR, the overall strategic approach should also describe any other components necessary for an effective and viable DDR process. For the most part, these will be activities that will take throughout the DDR programme and ensure the effectiveness of core DDR components. Some examples are: \n awareness\u00adraising and sensitization (in order to increase local understanding of, and participation in, DDR processes); \n capacity development for national institutions and communities (in contexts where capacities are weak or non\u00adexistent); \n weapons control and management (in contexts involving widespread availability of weapons in society); \n repatriation and resettlement (in contexts of massive internal and cross\u00adborder dis\u00ad placement); \n local peace\u00adbuilding and reconciliation (in contexts of deep social\/ethnic conflict).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -48061,7 +48061,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 862, - "Paragraph": "After a comprehensive assessment of the operational guidelines according to which DDR will be implemented, a model should be created as a basis for planning (see Annexes C and D. Annex E illustrates an approach taken to DDR in the DRC). In addition to defining how to operationalize the core components of DDR, the overall strategic approach should also describe any other components necessary for an effective and viable DDR process. For the most part, these will be activities that will take throughout the DDR programme and ensure the effectiveness of core DDR components. Some examples are: \\n awareness\u00adraising and sensitization (in order to increase local understanding of, and participation in, DDR processes); \\n capacity development for national institutions and communities (in contexts where capacities are weak or non\u00adexistent); \\n weapons control and management (in contexts involving widespread availability of weapons in society); \\n repatriation and resettlement (in contexts of massive internal and cross\u00adborder dis\u00ad placement); \\n local peace\u00adbuilding and reconciliation (in contexts of deep social\/ethnic conflict).", + "Paragraph": "After a comprehensive assessment of the operational guidelines according to which DDR will be implemented, a model should be created as a basis for planning (see Annexes C and D. Annex E illustrates an approach taken to DDR in the DRC). In addition to defining how to operationalize the core components of DDR, the overall strategic approach should also describe any other components necessary for an effective and viable DDR process. For the most part, these will be activities that will take throughout the DDR programme and ensure the effectiveness of core DDR components. Some examples are: \n awareness\u00adraising and sensitization (in order to increase local understanding of, and participation in, DDR processes); \n capacity development for national institutions and communities (in contexts where capacities are weak or non\u00adexistent); \n weapons control and management (in contexts involving widespread availability of weapons in society); \n repatriation and resettlement (in contexts of massive internal and cross\u00adborder dis\u00ad placement); \n local peace\u00adbuilding and reconciliation (in contexts of deep social\/ethnic conflict).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -48072,7 +48072,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.5. Overall strategic approach to DDR", "Heading3": "6.5.1. Defining the approach to DDR", "Heading4": "6.5.1.1. Putting DDR into operation", - "Sentence": "Some examples are: \\n awareness\u00adraising and sensitization (in order to increase local understanding of, and participation in, DDR processes); \\n capacity development for national institutions and communities (in contexts where capacities are weak or non\u00adexistent); \\n weapons control and management (in contexts involving widespread availability of weapons in society); \\n repatriation and resettlement (in contexts of massive internal and cross\u00adborder dis\u00ad placement); \\n local peace\u00adbuilding and reconciliation (in contexts of deep social\/ethnic conflict).", + "Sentence": "Some examples are: \n awareness\u00adraising and sensitization (in order to increase local understanding of, and participation in, DDR processes); \n capacity development for national institutions and communities (in contexts where capacities are weak or non\u00adexistent); \n weapons control and management (in contexts involving widespread availability of weapons in society); \n repatriation and resettlement (in contexts of massive internal and cross\u00adborder dis\u00ad placement); \n local peace\u00adbuilding and reconciliation (in contexts of deep social\/ethnic conflict).", "newParagraph": "comprehensive assessment operational guideline according ddr implemented model created basis planning see annex c annex e illustrates approach taken ddr drc addition defining operationalize core component ddr overall strategic approach also describe component necessary effective viable ddr process part activity take throughout ddr programme ensure effectiveness core ddr component example n awareness raising sensitization order increase local understanding participation ddr process n capacity development national institution community context capacity weak non existent n weapon control management context involving widespread availability weapon society n repatriation resettlement context massive internal cross border dis placement n local peace building reconciliation context deep socialethnic conflict", "ProcessedSent": "example n awareness raising sensitization order increase local understanding participation ddr process n capacity development national institution community context capacity weak non existent n weapon control management context involving widespread availability weapon society n repatriation resettlement context massive internal cross border dis placement n local peace building reconciliation context deep socialethnic conflict", "SentID": 2670 @@ -48673,7 +48673,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 874, - "Paragraph": "Once the strategic approach for the DDR programme has been designed, detailed imple\u00ad mentation strategies should be developed for each programme component. These may be annexed to the original programme document or developed as separate documents. Each strategy should include the following: \\n the objective of the component; \\n the strategic approach and methods adopted for its implementation; \\n an explanation of how key issues and considerations will be dealt with; \\n an overview of the implementation process and key activities necessary to achieve the objective.", + "Paragraph": "Once the strategic approach for the DDR programme has been designed, detailed imple\u00ad mentation strategies should be developed for each programme component. These may be annexed to the original programme document or developed as separate documents. Each strategy should include the following: \n the objective of the component; \n the strategic approach and methods adopted for its implementation; \n an explanation of how key issues and considerations will be dealt with; \n an overview of the implementation process and key activities necessary to achieve the objective.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -48691,7 +48691,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 874, - "Paragraph": "Once the strategic approach for the DDR programme has been designed, detailed imple\u00ad mentation strategies should be developed for each programme component. These may be annexed to the original programme document or developed as separate documents. Each strategy should include the following: \\n the objective of the component; \\n the strategic approach and methods adopted for its implementation; \\n an explanation of how key issues and considerations will be dealt with; \\n an overview of the implementation process and key activities necessary to achieve the objective.", + "Paragraph": "Once the strategic approach for the DDR programme has been designed, detailed imple\u00ad mentation strategies should be developed for each programme component. These may be annexed to the original programme document or developed as separate documents. Each strategy should include the following: \n the objective of the component; \n the strategic approach and methods adopted for its implementation; \n an explanation of how key issues and considerations will be dealt with; \n an overview of the implementation process and key activities necessary to achieve the objective.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -48709,7 +48709,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 874, - "Paragraph": "Once the strategic approach for the DDR programme has been designed, detailed imple\u00ad mentation strategies should be developed for each programme component. These may be annexed to the original programme document or developed as separate documents. Each strategy should include the following: \\n the objective of the component; \\n the strategic approach and methods adopted for its implementation; \\n an explanation of how key issues and considerations will be dealt with; \\n an overview of the implementation process and key activities necessary to achieve the objective.", + "Paragraph": "Once the strategic approach for the DDR programme has been designed, detailed imple\u00ad mentation strategies should be developed for each programme component. These may be annexed to the original programme document or developed as separate documents. Each strategy should include the following: \n the objective of the component; \n the strategic approach and methods adopted for its implementation; \n an explanation of how key issues and considerations will be dealt with; \n an overview of the implementation process and key activities necessary to achieve the objective.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -48720,7 +48720,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.6. DDR strategies", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Each strategy should include the following: \\n the objective of the component; \\n the strategic approach and methods adopted for its implementation; \\n an explanation of how key issues and considerations will be dealt with; \\n an overview of the implementation process and key activities necessary to achieve the objective.", + "Sentence": "Each strategy should include the following: \n the objective of the component; \n the strategic approach and methods adopted for its implementation; \n an explanation of how key issues and considerations will be dealt with; \n an overview of the implementation process and key activities necessary to achieve the objective.", "newParagraph": "strategic approach ddr programme designed detailed imple mentation strategy developed programme component may annexed original programme document developed separate document strategy include following n objective component n strategic approach method adopted implementation n explanation key issue consideration dealt n overview implementation process key activity necessary achieve objective", "ProcessedSent": "strategy include following n objective component n strategic approach method adopted implementation n explanation key issue consideration dealt n overview implementation process key activity necessary achieve objective", "SentID": 2706 @@ -48889,7 +48889,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 878, - "Paragraph": "The general results framework for a DDR programme should consist of the following elements (but not necessarily all of them) (see also Annex F for a general results framework for DDR that was used in Liberia): \\n Specific objectives and component outcomes: For each component of a DDR programme (i.e., disarmament, demobilization, reinsertion, reintegration, etc.), the main or longer\u00ad term strategic objectives should be clearly defined, together with the outcomes the UN is supporting. These provide a strategic framework for organizing and anchoring relevant activities and outputs; \\n Baseline data: For each specific objective, the initial starting point should be briefly described. In the absence of hard quantitative baseline data, give a qualitative descrip\u00ad tion of the current situation. Defining the baseline is a critical part of monitoring and evaluating the performance and impact of programmes; \\n Indicative activities: For each objective, a list of indicative activities should be provided in order to give a sense of the range and kind of activities that need to be implemented so as to achieve the expected outputs and objectives. For the general results frame\u00ad work, these do not need to be complete or highly detailed, but they must be sufficient to provide a sense of the underlying strategy, scope and range of actions that will be implemented; \\n Intervals: Activities and priority outputs should be have precise time\u00adlines (preferably specific dates). For each of these dates, indicate the expected level of result that should be achieved. This should allow an overview of how each relevant component of the programme is expected to progress over time and what has to be achieved by what date; \\n Targets and monitoring indicators: For each activity there should be an observable target, objectively verifiable and useful as a monitoring indicator. These indicators will vary depending on the activity, and they do not always have to be quantitative. For example, \u2018reduction in perceptions of violence\u2019 is as useful as \u201815 percent of ex\u00adcombatants success\u00ad fully reintegrated\u2019; \\n Inputs: For each activity or output there should be an indication of inputs and their costs. General cost categories should be used to identify the essential requirements, which can include staff, infrastructure, equipment, operating expenses, service contracts, grants, consultancies, etc.", + "Paragraph": "The general results framework for a DDR programme should consist of the following elements (but not necessarily all of them) (see also Annex F for a general results framework for DDR that was used in Liberia): \n Specific objectives and component outcomes: For each component of a DDR programme (i.e., disarmament, demobilization, reinsertion, reintegration, etc.), the main or longer\u00ad term strategic objectives should be clearly defined, together with the outcomes the UN is supporting. These provide a strategic framework for organizing and anchoring relevant activities and outputs; \n Baseline data: For each specific objective, the initial starting point should be briefly described. In the absence of hard quantitative baseline data, give a qualitative descrip\u00ad tion of the current situation. Defining the baseline is a critical part of monitoring and evaluating the performance and impact of programmes; \n Indicative activities: For each objective, a list of indicative activities should be provided in order to give a sense of the range and kind of activities that need to be implemented so as to achieve the expected outputs and objectives. For the general results frame\u00ad work, these do not need to be complete or highly detailed, but they must be sufficient to provide a sense of the underlying strategy, scope and range of actions that will be implemented; \n Intervals: Activities and priority outputs should be have precise time\u00adlines (preferably specific dates). For each of these dates, indicate the expected level of result that should be achieved. This should allow an overview of how each relevant component of the programme is expected to progress over time and what has to be achieved by what date; \n Targets and monitoring indicators: For each activity there should be an observable target, objectively verifiable and useful as a monitoring indicator. These indicators will vary depending on the activity, and they do not always have to be quantitative. For example, \u2018reduction in perceptions of violence\u2019 is as useful as \u201815 percent of ex\u00adcombatants success\u00ad fully reintegrated\u2019; \n Inputs: For each activity or output there should be an indication of inputs and their costs. General cost categories should be used to identify the essential requirements, which can include staff, infrastructure, equipment, operating expenses, service contracts, grants, consultancies, etc.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -48900,14 +48900,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1. General results framework", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The general results framework for a DDR programme should consist of the following elements (but not necessarily all of them) (see also Annex F for a general results framework for DDR that was used in Liberia): \\n Specific objectives and component outcomes: For each component of a DDR programme (i.e., disarmament, demobilization, reinsertion, reintegration, etc.", + "Sentence": "The general results framework for a DDR programme should consist of the following elements (but not necessarily all of them) (see also Annex F for a general results framework for DDR that was used in Liberia): \n Specific objectives and component outcomes: For each component of a DDR programme (i.e., disarmament, demobilization, reinsertion, reintegration, etc.", "newParagraph": "general result framework ddr programme consist following element necessarily see also annex f general result framework ddr used liberia n specific objective component outcome component ddr programme ie disarmament demobilization reinsertion reintegration etc main longer term strategic objective clearly defined together outcome un supporting provide strategic framework organizing anchoring relevant activity output n baseline data specific objective initial starting point briefly described absence hard quantitative baseline data give qualitative descrip tion current situation defining baseline critical part monitoring evaluating performance impact programme n indicative activity objective list indicative activity provided order give sense range kind activity need implemented achieve expected output objective general result frame work need complete highly detailed must sufficient provide sense underlying strategy scope range action implemented n interval activity priority output precise time line preferably specific date date indicate expected level result achieved allow overview relevant component programme expected progress time achieved date n target monitoring indicator activity observable target objectively verifiable useful monitoring indicator indicator vary depending activity always quantitative example reduction perception violence useful 15 percent ex combatant success fully reintegrated n input activity output indication input cost general cost category used identify essential requirement include staff infrastructure equipment operating expense service contract grant consultancy etc", "ProcessedSent": "general result framework ddr programme consist following element necessarily see also annex f general result framework ddr used liberia n specific objective component outcome component ddr programme ie disarmament demobilization reinsertion reintegration etc", "SentID": 2716 }, { "ParagraphID": 878, - "Paragraph": "The general results framework for a DDR programme should consist of the following elements (but not necessarily all of them) (see also Annex F for a general results framework for DDR that was used in Liberia): \\n Specific objectives and component outcomes: For each component of a DDR programme (i.e., disarmament, demobilization, reinsertion, reintegration, etc.), the main or longer\u00ad term strategic objectives should be clearly defined, together with the outcomes the UN is supporting. These provide a strategic framework for organizing and anchoring relevant activities and outputs; \\n Baseline data: For each specific objective, the initial starting point should be briefly described. In the absence of hard quantitative baseline data, give a qualitative descrip\u00ad tion of the current situation. Defining the baseline is a critical part of monitoring and evaluating the performance and impact of programmes; \\n Indicative activities: For each objective, a list of indicative activities should be provided in order to give a sense of the range and kind of activities that need to be implemented so as to achieve the expected outputs and objectives. For the general results frame\u00ad work, these do not need to be complete or highly detailed, but they must be sufficient to provide a sense of the underlying strategy, scope and range of actions that will be implemented; \\n Intervals: Activities and priority outputs should be have precise time\u00adlines (preferably specific dates). For each of these dates, indicate the expected level of result that should be achieved. This should allow an overview of how each relevant component of the programme is expected to progress over time and what has to be achieved by what date; \\n Targets and monitoring indicators: For each activity there should be an observable target, objectively verifiable and useful as a monitoring indicator. These indicators will vary depending on the activity, and they do not always have to be quantitative. For example, \u2018reduction in perceptions of violence\u2019 is as useful as \u201815 percent of ex\u00adcombatants success\u00ad fully reintegrated\u2019; \\n Inputs: For each activity or output there should be an indication of inputs and their costs. General cost categories should be used to identify the essential requirements, which can include staff, infrastructure, equipment, operating expenses, service contracts, grants, consultancies, etc.", + "Paragraph": "The general results framework for a DDR programme should consist of the following elements (but not necessarily all of them) (see also Annex F for a general results framework for DDR that was used in Liberia): \n Specific objectives and component outcomes: For each component of a DDR programme (i.e., disarmament, demobilization, reinsertion, reintegration, etc.), the main or longer\u00ad term strategic objectives should be clearly defined, together with the outcomes the UN is supporting. These provide a strategic framework for organizing and anchoring relevant activities and outputs; \n Baseline data: For each specific objective, the initial starting point should be briefly described. In the absence of hard quantitative baseline data, give a qualitative descrip\u00ad tion of the current situation. Defining the baseline is a critical part of monitoring and evaluating the performance and impact of programmes; \n Indicative activities: For each objective, a list of indicative activities should be provided in order to give a sense of the range and kind of activities that need to be implemented so as to achieve the expected outputs and objectives. For the general results frame\u00ad work, these do not need to be complete or highly detailed, but they must be sufficient to provide a sense of the underlying strategy, scope and range of actions that will be implemented; \n Intervals: Activities and priority outputs should be have precise time\u00adlines (preferably specific dates). For each of these dates, indicate the expected level of result that should be achieved. This should allow an overview of how each relevant component of the programme is expected to progress over time and what has to be achieved by what date; \n Targets and monitoring indicators: For each activity there should be an observable target, objectively verifiable and useful as a monitoring indicator. These indicators will vary depending on the activity, and they do not always have to be quantitative. For example, \u2018reduction in perceptions of violence\u2019 is as useful as \u201815 percent of ex\u00adcombatants success\u00ad fully reintegrated\u2019; \n Inputs: For each activity or output there should be an indication of inputs and their costs. General cost categories should be used to identify the essential requirements, which can include staff, infrastructure, equipment, operating expenses, service contracts, grants, consultancies, etc.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -48925,7 +48925,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 878, - "Paragraph": "The general results framework for a DDR programme should consist of the following elements (but not necessarily all of them) (see also Annex F for a general results framework for DDR that was used in Liberia): \\n Specific objectives and component outcomes: For each component of a DDR programme (i.e., disarmament, demobilization, reinsertion, reintegration, etc.), the main or longer\u00ad term strategic objectives should be clearly defined, together with the outcomes the UN is supporting. These provide a strategic framework for organizing and anchoring relevant activities and outputs; \\n Baseline data: For each specific objective, the initial starting point should be briefly described. In the absence of hard quantitative baseline data, give a qualitative descrip\u00ad tion of the current situation. Defining the baseline is a critical part of monitoring and evaluating the performance and impact of programmes; \\n Indicative activities: For each objective, a list of indicative activities should be provided in order to give a sense of the range and kind of activities that need to be implemented so as to achieve the expected outputs and objectives. For the general results frame\u00ad work, these do not need to be complete or highly detailed, but they must be sufficient to provide a sense of the underlying strategy, scope and range of actions that will be implemented; \\n Intervals: Activities and priority outputs should be have precise time\u00adlines (preferably specific dates). For each of these dates, indicate the expected level of result that should be achieved. This should allow an overview of how each relevant component of the programme is expected to progress over time and what has to be achieved by what date; \\n Targets and monitoring indicators: For each activity there should be an observable target, objectively verifiable and useful as a monitoring indicator. These indicators will vary depending on the activity, and they do not always have to be quantitative. For example, \u2018reduction in perceptions of violence\u2019 is as useful as \u201815 percent of ex\u00adcombatants success\u00ad fully reintegrated\u2019; \\n Inputs: For each activity or output there should be an indication of inputs and their costs. General cost categories should be used to identify the essential requirements, which can include staff, infrastructure, equipment, operating expenses, service contracts, grants, consultancies, etc.", + "Paragraph": "The general results framework for a DDR programme should consist of the following elements (but not necessarily all of them) (see also Annex F for a general results framework for DDR that was used in Liberia): \n Specific objectives and component outcomes: For each component of a DDR programme (i.e., disarmament, demobilization, reinsertion, reintegration, etc.), the main or longer\u00ad term strategic objectives should be clearly defined, together with the outcomes the UN is supporting. These provide a strategic framework for organizing and anchoring relevant activities and outputs; \n Baseline data: For each specific objective, the initial starting point should be briefly described. In the absence of hard quantitative baseline data, give a qualitative descrip\u00ad tion of the current situation. Defining the baseline is a critical part of monitoring and evaluating the performance and impact of programmes; \n Indicative activities: For each objective, a list of indicative activities should be provided in order to give a sense of the range and kind of activities that need to be implemented so as to achieve the expected outputs and objectives. For the general results frame\u00ad work, these do not need to be complete or highly detailed, but they must be sufficient to provide a sense of the underlying strategy, scope and range of actions that will be implemented; \n Intervals: Activities and priority outputs should be have precise time\u00adlines (preferably specific dates). For each of these dates, indicate the expected level of result that should be achieved. This should allow an overview of how each relevant component of the programme is expected to progress over time and what has to be achieved by what date; \n Targets and monitoring indicators: For each activity there should be an observable target, objectively verifiable and useful as a monitoring indicator. These indicators will vary depending on the activity, and they do not always have to be quantitative. For example, \u2018reduction in perceptions of violence\u2019 is as useful as \u201815 percent of ex\u00adcombatants success\u00ad fully reintegrated\u2019; \n Inputs: For each activity or output there should be an indication of inputs and their costs. General cost categories should be used to identify the essential requirements, which can include staff, infrastructure, equipment, operating expenses, service contracts, grants, consultancies, etc.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -48936,14 +48936,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1. General results framework", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "These provide a strategic framework for organizing and anchoring relevant activities and outputs; \\n Baseline data: For each specific objective, the initial starting point should be briefly described.", + "Sentence": "These provide a strategic framework for organizing and anchoring relevant activities and outputs; \n Baseline data: For each specific objective, the initial starting point should be briefly described.", "newParagraph": "general result framework ddr programme consist following element necessarily see also annex f general result framework ddr used liberia n specific objective component outcome component ddr programme ie disarmament demobilization reinsertion reintegration etc main longer term strategic objective clearly defined together outcome un supporting provide strategic framework organizing anchoring relevant activity output n baseline data specific objective initial starting point briefly described absence hard quantitative baseline data give qualitative descrip tion current situation defining baseline critical part monitoring evaluating performance impact programme n indicative activity objective list indicative activity provided order give sense range kind activity need implemented achieve expected output objective general result frame work need complete highly detailed must sufficient provide sense underlying strategy scope range action implemented n interval activity priority output precise time line preferably specific date date indicate expected level result achieved allow overview relevant component programme expected progress time achieved date n target monitoring indicator activity observable target objectively verifiable useful monitoring indicator indicator vary depending activity always quantitative example reduction perception violence useful 15 percent ex combatant success fully reintegrated n input activity output indication input cost general cost category used identify essential requirement include staff infrastructure equipment operating expense service contract grant consultancy etc", "ProcessedSent": "provide strategic framework organizing anchoring relevant activity output n baseline data specific objective initial starting point briefly described", "SentID": 2718 }, { "ParagraphID": 878, - "Paragraph": "The general results framework for a DDR programme should consist of the following elements (but not necessarily all of them) (see also Annex F for a general results framework for DDR that was used in Liberia): \\n Specific objectives and component outcomes: For each component of a DDR programme (i.e., disarmament, demobilization, reinsertion, reintegration, etc.), the main or longer\u00ad term strategic objectives should be clearly defined, together with the outcomes the UN is supporting. These provide a strategic framework for organizing and anchoring relevant activities and outputs; \\n Baseline data: For each specific objective, the initial starting point should be briefly described. In the absence of hard quantitative baseline data, give a qualitative descrip\u00ad tion of the current situation. Defining the baseline is a critical part of monitoring and evaluating the performance and impact of programmes; \\n Indicative activities: For each objective, a list of indicative activities should be provided in order to give a sense of the range and kind of activities that need to be implemented so as to achieve the expected outputs and objectives. For the general results frame\u00ad work, these do not need to be complete or highly detailed, but they must be sufficient to provide a sense of the underlying strategy, scope and range of actions that will be implemented; \\n Intervals: Activities and priority outputs should be have precise time\u00adlines (preferably specific dates). For each of these dates, indicate the expected level of result that should be achieved. This should allow an overview of how each relevant component of the programme is expected to progress over time and what has to be achieved by what date; \\n Targets and monitoring indicators: For each activity there should be an observable target, objectively verifiable and useful as a monitoring indicator. These indicators will vary depending on the activity, and they do not always have to be quantitative. For example, \u2018reduction in perceptions of violence\u2019 is as useful as \u201815 percent of ex\u00adcombatants success\u00ad fully reintegrated\u2019; \\n Inputs: For each activity or output there should be an indication of inputs and their costs. General cost categories should be used to identify the essential requirements, which can include staff, infrastructure, equipment, operating expenses, service contracts, grants, consultancies, etc.", + "Paragraph": "The general results framework for a DDR programme should consist of the following elements (but not necessarily all of them) (see also Annex F for a general results framework for DDR that was used in Liberia): \n Specific objectives and component outcomes: For each component of a DDR programme (i.e., disarmament, demobilization, reinsertion, reintegration, etc.), the main or longer\u00ad term strategic objectives should be clearly defined, together with the outcomes the UN is supporting. These provide a strategic framework for organizing and anchoring relevant activities and outputs; \n Baseline data: For each specific objective, the initial starting point should be briefly described. In the absence of hard quantitative baseline data, give a qualitative descrip\u00ad tion of the current situation. Defining the baseline is a critical part of monitoring and evaluating the performance and impact of programmes; \n Indicative activities: For each objective, a list of indicative activities should be provided in order to give a sense of the range and kind of activities that need to be implemented so as to achieve the expected outputs and objectives. For the general results frame\u00ad work, these do not need to be complete or highly detailed, but they must be sufficient to provide a sense of the underlying strategy, scope and range of actions that will be implemented; \n Intervals: Activities and priority outputs should be have precise time\u00adlines (preferably specific dates). For each of these dates, indicate the expected level of result that should be achieved. This should allow an overview of how each relevant component of the programme is expected to progress over time and what has to be achieved by what date; \n Targets and monitoring indicators: For each activity there should be an observable target, objectively verifiable and useful as a monitoring indicator. These indicators will vary depending on the activity, and they do not always have to be quantitative. For example, \u2018reduction in perceptions of violence\u2019 is as useful as \u201815 percent of ex\u00adcombatants success\u00ad fully reintegrated\u2019; \n Inputs: For each activity or output there should be an indication of inputs and their costs. General cost categories should be used to identify the essential requirements, which can include staff, infrastructure, equipment, operating expenses, service contracts, grants, consultancies, etc.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -48961,7 +48961,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 878, - "Paragraph": "The general results framework for a DDR programme should consist of the following elements (but not necessarily all of them) (see also Annex F for a general results framework for DDR that was used in Liberia): \\n Specific objectives and component outcomes: For each component of a DDR programme (i.e., disarmament, demobilization, reinsertion, reintegration, etc.), the main or longer\u00ad term strategic objectives should be clearly defined, together with the outcomes the UN is supporting. These provide a strategic framework for organizing and anchoring relevant activities and outputs; \\n Baseline data: For each specific objective, the initial starting point should be briefly described. In the absence of hard quantitative baseline data, give a qualitative descrip\u00ad tion of the current situation. Defining the baseline is a critical part of monitoring and evaluating the performance and impact of programmes; \\n Indicative activities: For each objective, a list of indicative activities should be provided in order to give a sense of the range and kind of activities that need to be implemented so as to achieve the expected outputs and objectives. For the general results frame\u00ad work, these do not need to be complete or highly detailed, but they must be sufficient to provide a sense of the underlying strategy, scope and range of actions that will be implemented; \\n Intervals: Activities and priority outputs should be have precise time\u00adlines (preferably specific dates). For each of these dates, indicate the expected level of result that should be achieved. This should allow an overview of how each relevant component of the programme is expected to progress over time and what has to be achieved by what date; \\n Targets and monitoring indicators: For each activity there should be an observable target, objectively verifiable and useful as a monitoring indicator. These indicators will vary depending on the activity, and they do not always have to be quantitative. For example, \u2018reduction in perceptions of violence\u2019 is as useful as \u201815 percent of ex\u00adcombatants success\u00ad fully reintegrated\u2019; \\n Inputs: For each activity or output there should be an indication of inputs and their costs. General cost categories should be used to identify the essential requirements, which can include staff, infrastructure, equipment, operating expenses, service contracts, grants, consultancies, etc.", + "Paragraph": "The general results framework for a DDR programme should consist of the following elements (but not necessarily all of them) (see also Annex F for a general results framework for DDR that was used in Liberia): \n Specific objectives and component outcomes: For each component of a DDR programme (i.e., disarmament, demobilization, reinsertion, reintegration, etc.), the main or longer\u00ad term strategic objectives should be clearly defined, together with the outcomes the UN is supporting. These provide a strategic framework for organizing and anchoring relevant activities and outputs; \n Baseline data: For each specific objective, the initial starting point should be briefly described. In the absence of hard quantitative baseline data, give a qualitative descrip\u00ad tion of the current situation. Defining the baseline is a critical part of monitoring and evaluating the performance and impact of programmes; \n Indicative activities: For each objective, a list of indicative activities should be provided in order to give a sense of the range and kind of activities that need to be implemented so as to achieve the expected outputs and objectives. For the general results frame\u00ad work, these do not need to be complete or highly detailed, but they must be sufficient to provide a sense of the underlying strategy, scope and range of actions that will be implemented; \n Intervals: Activities and priority outputs should be have precise time\u00adlines (preferably specific dates). For each of these dates, indicate the expected level of result that should be achieved. This should allow an overview of how each relevant component of the programme is expected to progress over time and what has to be achieved by what date; \n Targets and monitoring indicators: For each activity there should be an observable target, objectively verifiable and useful as a monitoring indicator. These indicators will vary depending on the activity, and they do not always have to be quantitative. For example, \u2018reduction in perceptions of violence\u2019 is as useful as \u201815 percent of ex\u00adcombatants success\u00ad fully reintegrated\u2019; \n Inputs: For each activity or output there should be an indication of inputs and their costs. General cost categories should be used to identify the essential requirements, which can include staff, infrastructure, equipment, operating expenses, service contracts, grants, consultancies, etc.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -48972,14 +48972,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1. General results framework", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Defining the baseline is a critical part of monitoring and evaluating the performance and impact of programmes; \\n Indicative activities: For each objective, a list of indicative activities should be provided in order to give a sense of the range and kind of activities that need to be implemented so as to achieve the expected outputs and objectives.", + "Sentence": "Defining the baseline is a critical part of monitoring and evaluating the performance and impact of programmes; \n Indicative activities: For each objective, a list of indicative activities should be provided in order to give a sense of the range and kind of activities that need to be implemented so as to achieve the expected outputs and objectives.", "newParagraph": "general result framework ddr programme consist following element necessarily see also annex f general result framework ddr used liberia n specific objective component outcome component ddr programme ie disarmament demobilization reinsertion reintegration etc main longer term strategic objective clearly defined together outcome un supporting provide strategic framework organizing anchoring relevant activity output n baseline data specific objective initial starting point briefly described absence hard quantitative baseline data give qualitative descrip tion current situation defining baseline critical part monitoring evaluating performance impact programme n indicative activity objective list indicative activity provided order give sense range kind activity need implemented achieve expected output objective general result frame work need complete highly detailed must sufficient provide sense underlying strategy scope range action implemented n interval activity priority output precise time line preferably specific date date indicate expected level result achieved allow overview relevant component programme expected progress time achieved date n target monitoring indicator activity observable target objectively verifiable useful monitoring indicator indicator vary depending activity always quantitative example reduction perception violence useful 15 percent ex combatant success fully reintegrated n input activity output indication input cost general cost category used identify essential requirement include staff infrastructure equipment operating expense service contract grant consultancy etc", "ProcessedSent": "defining baseline critical part monitoring evaluating performance impact programme n indicative activity objective list indicative activity provided order give sense range kind activity need implemented achieve expected output objective", "SentID": 2720 }, { "ParagraphID": 878, - "Paragraph": "The general results framework for a DDR programme should consist of the following elements (but not necessarily all of them) (see also Annex F for a general results framework for DDR that was used in Liberia): \\n Specific objectives and component outcomes: For each component of a DDR programme (i.e., disarmament, demobilization, reinsertion, reintegration, etc.), the main or longer\u00ad term strategic objectives should be clearly defined, together with the outcomes the UN is supporting. These provide a strategic framework for organizing and anchoring relevant activities and outputs; \\n Baseline data: For each specific objective, the initial starting point should be briefly described. In the absence of hard quantitative baseline data, give a qualitative descrip\u00ad tion of the current situation. Defining the baseline is a critical part of monitoring and evaluating the performance and impact of programmes; \\n Indicative activities: For each objective, a list of indicative activities should be provided in order to give a sense of the range and kind of activities that need to be implemented so as to achieve the expected outputs and objectives. For the general results frame\u00ad work, these do not need to be complete or highly detailed, but they must be sufficient to provide a sense of the underlying strategy, scope and range of actions that will be implemented; \\n Intervals: Activities and priority outputs should be have precise time\u00adlines (preferably specific dates). For each of these dates, indicate the expected level of result that should be achieved. This should allow an overview of how each relevant component of the programme is expected to progress over time and what has to be achieved by what date; \\n Targets and monitoring indicators: For each activity there should be an observable target, objectively verifiable and useful as a monitoring indicator. These indicators will vary depending on the activity, and they do not always have to be quantitative. For example, \u2018reduction in perceptions of violence\u2019 is as useful as \u201815 percent of ex\u00adcombatants success\u00ad fully reintegrated\u2019; \\n Inputs: For each activity or output there should be an indication of inputs and their costs. General cost categories should be used to identify the essential requirements, which can include staff, infrastructure, equipment, operating expenses, service contracts, grants, consultancies, etc.", + "Paragraph": "The general results framework for a DDR programme should consist of the following elements (but not necessarily all of them) (see also Annex F for a general results framework for DDR that was used in Liberia): \n Specific objectives and component outcomes: For each component of a DDR programme (i.e., disarmament, demobilization, reinsertion, reintegration, etc.), the main or longer\u00ad term strategic objectives should be clearly defined, together with the outcomes the UN is supporting. These provide a strategic framework for organizing and anchoring relevant activities and outputs; \n Baseline data: For each specific objective, the initial starting point should be briefly described. In the absence of hard quantitative baseline data, give a qualitative descrip\u00ad tion of the current situation. Defining the baseline is a critical part of monitoring and evaluating the performance and impact of programmes; \n Indicative activities: For each objective, a list of indicative activities should be provided in order to give a sense of the range and kind of activities that need to be implemented so as to achieve the expected outputs and objectives. For the general results frame\u00ad work, these do not need to be complete or highly detailed, but they must be sufficient to provide a sense of the underlying strategy, scope and range of actions that will be implemented; \n Intervals: Activities and priority outputs should be have precise time\u00adlines (preferably specific dates). For each of these dates, indicate the expected level of result that should be achieved. This should allow an overview of how each relevant component of the programme is expected to progress over time and what has to be achieved by what date; \n Targets and monitoring indicators: For each activity there should be an observable target, objectively verifiable and useful as a monitoring indicator. These indicators will vary depending on the activity, and they do not always have to be quantitative. For example, \u2018reduction in perceptions of violence\u2019 is as useful as \u201815 percent of ex\u00adcombatants success\u00ad fully reintegrated\u2019; \n Inputs: For each activity or output there should be an indication of inputs and their costs. General cost categories should be used to identify the essential requirements, which can include staff, infrastructure, equipment, operating expenses, service contracts, grants, consultancies, etc.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -48990,14 +48990,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1. General results framework", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "For the general results frame\u00ad work, these do not need to be complete or highly detailed, but they must be sufficient to provide a sense of the underlying strategy, scope and range of actions that will be implemented; \\n Intervals: Activities and priority outputs should be have precise time\u00adlines (preferably specific dates).", + "Sentence": "For the general results frame\u00ad work, these do not need to be complete or highly detailed, but they must be sufficient to provide a sense of the underlying strategy, scope and range of actions that will be implemented; \n Intervals: Activities and priority outputs should be have precise time\u00adlines (preferably specific dates).", "newParagraph": "general result framework ddr programme consist following element necessarily see also annex f general result framework ddr used liberia n specific objective component outcome component ddr programme ie disarmament demobilization reinsertion reintegration etc main longer term strategic objective clearly defined together outcome un supporting provide strategic framework organizing anchoring relevant activity output n baseline data specific objective initial starting point briefly described absence hard quantitative baseline data give qualitative descrip tion current situation defining baseline critical part monitoring evaluating performance impact programme n indicative activity objective list indicative activity provided order give sense range kind activity need implemented achieve expected output objective general result frame work need complete highly detailed must sufficient provide sense underlying strategy scope range action implemented n interval activity priority output precise time line preferably specific date date indicate expected level result achieved allow overview relevant component programme expected progress time achieved date n target monitoring indicator activity observable target objectively verifiable useful monitoring indicator indicator vary depending activity always quantitative example reduction perception violence useful 15 percent ex combatant success fully reintegrated n input activity output indication input cost general cost category used identify essential requirement include staff infrastructure equipment operating expense service contract grant consultancy etc", "ProcessedSent": "general result frame work need complete highly detailed must sufficient provide sense underlying strategy scope range action implemented n interval activity priority output precise time line preferably specific date", "SentID": 2721 }, { "ParagraphID": 878, - "Paragraph": "The general results framework for a DDR programme should consist of the following elements (but not necessarily all of them) (see also Annex F for a general results framework for DDR that was used in Liberia): \\n Specific objectives and component outcomes: For each component of a DDR programme (i.e., disarmament, demobilization, reinsertion, reintegration, etc.), the main or longer\u00ad term strategic objectives should be clearly defined, together with the outcomes the UN is supporting. These provide a strategic framework for organizing and anchoring relevant activities and outputs; \\n Baseline data: For each specific objective, the initial starting point should be briefly described. In the absence of hard quantitative baseline data, give a qualitative descrip\u00ad tion of the current situation. Defining the baseline is a critical part of monitoring and evaluating the performance and impact of programmes; \\n Indicative activities: For each objective, a list of indicative activities should be provided in order to give a sense of the range and kind of activities that need to be implemented so as to achieve the expected outputs and objectives. For the general results frame\u00ad work, these do not need to be complete or highly detailed, but they must be sufficient to provide a sense of the underlying strategy, scope and range of actions that will be implemented; \\n Intervals: Activities and priority outputs should be have precise time\u00adlines (preferably specific dates). For each of these dates, indicate the expected level of result that should be achieved. This should allow an overview of how each relevant component of the programme is expected to progress over time and what has to be achieved by what date; \\n Targets and monitoring indicators: For each activity there should be an observable target, objectively verifiable and useful as a monitoring indicator. These indicators will vary depending on the activity, and they do not always have to be quantitative. For example, \u2018reduction in perceptions of violence\u2019 is as useful as \u201815 percent of ex\u00adcombatants success\u00ad fully reintegrated\u2019; \\n Inputs: For each activity or output there should be an indication of inputs and their costs. General cost categories should be used to identify the essential requirements, which can include staff, infrastructure, equipment, operating expenses, service contracts, grants, consultancies, etc.", + "Paragraph": "The general results framework for a DDR programme should consist of the following elements (but not necessarily all of them) (see also Annex F for a general results framework for DDR that was used in Liberia): \n Specific objectives and component outcomes: For each component of a DDR programme (i.e., disarmament, demobilization, reinsertion, reintegration, etc.), the main or longer\u00ad term strategic objectives should be clearly defined, together with the outcomes the UN is supporting. These provide a strategic framework for organizing and anchoring relevant activities and outputs; \n Baseline data: For each specific objective, the initial starting point should be briefly described. In the absence of hard quantitative baseline data, give a qualitative descrip\u00ad tion of the current situation. Defining the baseline is a critical part of monitoring and evaluating the performance and impact of programmes; \n Indicative activities: For each objective, a list of indicative activities should be provided in order to give a sense of the range and kind of activities that need to be implemented so as to achieve the expected outputs and objectives. For the general results frame\u00ad work, these do not need to be complete or highly detailed, but they must be sufficient to provide a sense of the underlying strategy, scope and range of actions that will be implemented; \n Intervals: Activities and priority outputs should be have precise time\u00adlines (preferably specific dates). For each of these dates, indicate the expected level of result that should be achieved. This should allow an overview of how each relevant component of the programme is expected to progress over time and what has to be achieved by what date; \n Targets and monitoring indicators: For each activity there should be an observable target, objectively verifiable and useful as a monitoring indicator. These indicators will vary depending on the activity, and they do not always have to be quantitative. For example, \u2018reduction in perceptions of violence\u2019 is as useful as \u201815 percent of ex\u00adcombatants success\u00ad fully reintegrated\u2019; \n Inputs: For each activity or output there should be an indication of inputs and their costs. General cost categories should be used to identify the essential requirements, which can include staff, infrastructure, equipment, operating expenses, service contracts, grants, consultancies, etc.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49015,7 +49015,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 878, - "Paragraph": "The general results framework for a DDR programme should consist of the following elements (but not necessarily all of them) (see also Annex F for a general results framework for DDR that was used in Liberia): \\n Specific objectives and component outcomes: For each component of a DDR programme (i.e., disarmament, demobilization, reinsertion, reintegration, etc.), the main or longer\u00ad term strategic objectives should be clearly defined, together with the outcomes the UN is supporting. These provide a strategic framework for organizing and anchoring relevant activities and outputs; \\n Baseline data: For each specific objective, the initial starting point should be briefly described. In the absence of hard quantitative baseline data, give a qualitative descrip\u00ad tion of the current situation. Defining the baseline is a critical part of monitoring and evaluating the performance and impact of programmes; \\n Indicative activities: For each objective, a list of indicative activities should be provided in order to give a sense of the range and kind of activities that need to be implemented so as to achieve the expected outputs and objectives. For the general results frame\u00ad work, these do not need to be complete or highly detailed, but they must be sufficient to provide a sense of the underlying strategy, scope and range of actions that will be implemented; \\n Intervals: Activities and priority outputs should be have precise time\u00adlines (preferably specific dates). For each of these dates, indicate the expected level of result that should be achieved. This should allow an overview of how each relevant component of the programme is expected to progress over time and what has to be achieved by what date; \\n Targets and monitoring indicators: For each activity there should be an observable target, objectively verifiable and useful as a monitoring indicator. These indicators will vary depending on the activity, and they do not always have to be quantitative. For example, \u2018reduction in perceptions of violence\u2019 is as useful as \u201815 percent of ex\u00adcombatants success\u00ad fully reintegrated\u2019; \\n Inputs: For each activity or output there should be an indication of inputs and their costs. General cost categories should be used to identify the essential requirements, which can include staff, infrastructure, equipment, operating expenses, service contracts, grants, consultancies, etc.", + "Paragraph": "The general results framework for a DDR programme should consist of the following elements (but not necessarily all of them) (see also Annex F for a general results framework for DDR that was used in Liberia): \n Specific objectives and component outcomes: For each component of a DDR programme (i.e., disarmament, demobilization, reinsertion, reintegration, etc.), the main or longer\u00ad term strategic objectives should be clearly defined, together with the outcomes the UN is supporting. These provide a strategic framework for organizing and anchoring relevant activities and outputs; \n Baseline data: For each specific objective, the initial starting point should be briefly described. In the absence of hard quantitative baseline data, give a qualitative descrip\u00ad tion of the current situation. Defining the baseline is a critical part of monitoring and evaluating the performance and impact of programmes; \n Indicative activities: For each objective, a list of indicative activities should be provided in order to give a sense of the range and kind of activities that need to be implemented so as to achieve the expected outputs and objectives. For the general results frame\u00ad work, these do not need to be complete or highly detailed, but they must be sufficient to provide a sense of the underlying strategy, scope and range of actions that will be implemented; \n Intervals: Activities and priority outputs should be have precise time\u00adlines (preferably specific dates). For each of these dates, indicate the expected level of result that should be achieved. This should allow an overview of how each relevant component of the programme is expected to progress over time and what has to be achieved by what date; \n Targets and monitoring indicators: For each activity there should be an observable target, objectively verifiable and useful as a monitoring indicator. These indicators will vary depending on the activity, and they do not always have to be quantitative. For example, \u2018reduction in perceptions of violence\u2019 is as useful as \u201815 percent of ex\u00adcombatants success\u00ad fully reintegrated\u2019; \n Inputs: For each activity or output there should be an indication of inputs and their costs. General cost categories should be used to identify the essential requirements, which can include staff, infrastructure, equipment, operating expenses, service contracts, grants, consultancies, etc.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49026,14 +49026,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1. General results framework", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This should allow an overview of how each relevant component of the programme is expected to progress over time and what has to be achieved by what date; \\n Targets and monitoring indicators: For each activity there should be an observable target, objectively verifiable and useful as a monitoring indicator.", + "Sentence": "This should allow an overview of how each relevant component of the programme is expected to progress over time and what has to be achieved by what date; \n Targets and monitoring indicators: For each activity there should be an observable target, objectively verifiable and useful as a monitoring indicator.", "newParagraph": "general result framework ddr programme consist following element necessarily see also annex f general result framework ddr used liberia n specific objective component outcome component ddr programme ie disarmament demobilization reinsertion reintegration etc main longer term strategic objective clearly defined together outcome un supporting provide strategic framework organizing anchoring relevant activity output n baseline data specific objective initial starting point briefly described absence hard quantitative baseline data give qualitative descrip tion current situation defining baseline critical part monitoring evaluating performance impact programme n indicative activity objective list indicative activity provided order give sense range kind activity need implemented achieve expected output objective general result frame work need complete highly detailed must sufficient provide sense underlying strategy scope range action implemented n interval activity priority output precise time line preferably specific date date indicate expected level result achieved allow overview relevant component programme expected progress time achieved date n target monitoring indicator activity observable target objectively verifiable useful monitoring indicator indicator vary depending activity always quantitative example reduction perception violence useful 15 percent ex combatant success fully reintegrated n input activity output indication input cost general cost category used identify essential requirement include staff infrastructure equipment operating expense service contract grant consultancy etc", "ProcessedSent": "allow overview relevant component programme expected progress time achieved date n target monitoring indicator activity observable target objectively verifiable useful monitoring indicator", "SentID": 2723 }, { "ParagraphID": 878, - "Paragraph": "The general results framework for a DDR programme should consist of the following elements (but not necessarily all of them) (see also Annex F for a general results framework for DDR that was used in Liberia): \\n Specific objectives and component outcomes: For each component of a DDR programme (i.e., disarmament, demobilization, reinsertion, reintegration, etc.), the main or longer\u00ad term strategic objectives should be clearly defined, together with the outcomes the UN is supporting. These provide a strategic framework for organizing and anchoring relevant activities and outputs; \\n Baseline data: For each specific objective, the initial starting point should be briefly described. In the absence of hard quantitative baseline data, give a qualitative descrip\u00ad tion of the current situation. Defining the baseline is a critical part of monitoring and evaluating the performance and impact of programmes; \\n Indicative activities: For each objective, a list of indicative activities should be provided in order to give a sense of the range and kind of activities that need to be implemented so as to achieve the expected outputs and objectives. For the general results frame\u00ad work, these do not need to be complete or highly detailed, but they must be sufficient to provide a sense of the underlying strategy, scope and range of actions that will be implemented; \\n Intervals: Activities and priority outputs should be have precise time\u00adlines (preferably specific dates). For each of these dates, indicate the expected level of result that should be achieved. This should allow an overview of how each relevant component of the programme is expected to progress over time and what has to be achieved by what date; \\n Targets and monitoring indicators: For each activity there should be an observable target, objectively verifiable and useful as a monitoring indicator. These indicators will vary depending on the activity, and they do not always have to be quantitative. For example, \u2018reduction in perceptions of violence\u2019 is as useful as \u201815 percent of ex\u00adcombatants success\u00ad fully reintegrated\u2019; \\n Inputs: For each activity or output there should be an indication of inputs and their costs. General cost categories should be used to identify the essential requirements, which can include staff, infrastructure, equipment, operating expenses, service contracts, grants, consultancies, etc.", + "Paragraph": "The general results framework for a DDR programme should consist of the following elements (but not necessarily all of them) (see also Annex F for a general results framework for DDR that was used in Liberia): \n Specific objectives and component outcomes: For each component of a DDR programme (i.e., disarmament, demobilization, reinsertion, reintegration, etc.), the main or longer\u00ad term strategic objectives should be clearly defined, together with the outcomes the UN is supporting. These provide a strategic framework for organizing and anchoring relevant activities and outputs; \n Baseline data: For each specific objective, the initial starting point should be briefly described. In the absence of hard quantitative baseline data, give a qualitative descrip\u00ad tion of the current situation. Defining the baseline is a critical part of monitoring and evaluating the performance and impact of programmes; \n Indicative activities: For each objective, a list of indicative activities should be provided in order to give a sense of the range and kind of activities that need to be implemented so as to achieve the expected outputs and objectives. For the general results frame\u00ad work, these do not need to be complete or highly detailed, but they must be sufficient to provide a sense of the underlying strategy, scope and range of actions that will be implemented; \n Intervals: Activities and priority outputs should be have precise time\u00adlines (preferably specific dates). For each of these dates, indicate the expected level of result that should be achieved. This should allow an overview of how each relevant component of the programme is expected to progress over time and what has to be achieved by what date; \n Targets and monitoring indicators: For each activity there should be an observable target, objectively verifiable and useful as a monitoring indicator. These indicators will vary depending on the activity, and they do not always have to be quantitative. For example, \u2018reduction in perceptions of violence\u2019 is as useful as \u201815 percent of ex\u00adcombatants success\u00ad fully reintegrated\u2019; \n Inputs: For each activity or output there should be an indication of inputs and their costs. General cost categories should be used to identify the essential requirements, which can include staff, infrastructure, equipment, operating expenses, service contracts, grants, consultancies, etc.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49051,7 +49051,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 878, - "Paragraph": "The general results framework for a DDR programme should consist of the following elements (but not necessarily all of them) (see also Annex F for a general results framework for DDR that was used in Liberia): \\n Specific objectives and component outcomes: For each component of a DDR programme (i.e., disarmament, demobilization, reinsertion, reintegration, etc.), the main or longer\u00ad term strategic objectives should be clearly defined, together with the outcomes the UN is supporting. These provide a strategic framework for organizing and anchoring relevant activities and outputs; \\n Baseline data: For each specific objective, the initial starting point should be briefly described. In the absence of hard quantitative baseline data, give a qualitative descrip\u00ad tion of the current situation. Defining the baseline is a critical part of monitoring and evaluating the performance and impact of programmes; \\n Indicative activities: For each objective, a list of indicative activities should be provided in order to give a sense of the range and kind of activities that need to be implemented so as to achieve the expected outputs and objectives. For the general results frame\u00ad work, these do not need to be complete or highly detailed, but they must be sufficient to provide a sense of the underlying strategy, scope and range of actions that will be implemented; \\n Intervals: Activities and priority outputs should be have precise time\u00adlines (preferably specific dates). For each of these dates, indicate the expected level of result that should be achieved. This should allow an overview of how each relevant component of the programme is expected to progress over time and what has to be achieved by what date; \\n Targets and monitoring indicators: For each activity there should be an observable target, objectively verifiable and useful as a monitoring indicator. These indicators will vary depending on the activity, and they do not always have to be quantitative. For example, \u2018reduction in perceptions of violence\u2019 is as useful as \u201815 percent of ex\u00adcombatants success\u00ad fully reintegrated\u2019; \\n Inputs: For each activity or output there should be an indication of inputs and their costs. General cost categories should be used to identify the essential requirements, which can include staff, infrastructure, equipment, operating expenses, service contracts, grants, consultancies, etc.", + "Paragraph": "The general results framework for a DDR programme should consist of the following elements (but not necessarily all of them) (see also Annex F for a general results framework for DDR that was used in Liberia): \n Specific objectives and component outcomes: For each component of a DDR programme (i.e., disarmament, demobilization, reinsertion, reintegration, etc.), the main or longer\u00ad term strategic objectives should be clearly defined, together with the outcomes the UN is supporting. These provide a strategic framework for organizing and anchoring relevant activities and outputs; \n Baseline data: For each specific objective, the initial starting point should be briefly described. In the absence of hard quantitative baseline data, give a qualitative descrip\u00ad tion of the current situation. Defining the baseline is a critical part of monitoring and evaluating the performance and impact of programmes; \n Indicative activities: For each objective, a list of indicative activities should be provided in order to give a sense of the range and kind of activities that need to be implemented so as to achieve the expected outputs and objectives. For the general results frame\u00ad work, these do not need to be complete or highly detailed, but they must be sufficient to provide a sense of the underlying strategy, scope and range of actions that will be implemented; \n Intervals: Activities and priority outputs should be have precise time\u00adlines (preferably specific dates). For each of these dates, indicate the expected level of result that should be achieved. This should allow an overview of how each relevant component of the programme is expected to progress over time and what has to be achieved by what date; \n Targets and monitoring indicators: For each activity there should be an observable target, objectively verifiable and useful as a monitoring indicator. These indicators will vary depending on the activity, and they do not always have to be quantitative. For example, \u2018reduction in perceptions of violence\u2019 is as useful as \u201815 percent of ex\u00adcombatants success\u00ad fully reintegrated\u2019; \n Inputs: For each activity or output there should be an indication of inputs and their costs. General cost categories should be used to identify the essential requirements, which can include staff, infrastructure, equipment, operating expenses, service contracts, grants, consultancies, etc.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49062,14 +49062,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1. General results framework", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "For example, \u2018reduction in perceptions of violence\u2019 is as useful as \u201815 percent of ex\u00adcombatants success\u00ad fully reintegrated\u2019; \\n Inputs: For each activity or output there should be an indication of inputs and their costs.", + "Sentence": "For example, \u2018reduction in perceptions of violence\u2019 is as useful as \u201815 percent of ex\u00adcombatants success\u00ad fully reintegrated\u2019; \n Inputs: For each activity or output there should be an indication of inputs and their costs.", "newParagraph": "general result framework ddr programme consist following element necessarily see also annex f general result framework ddr used liberia n specific objective component outcome component ddr programme ie disarmament demobilization reinsertion reintegration etc main longer term strategic objective clearly defined together outcome un supporting provide strategic framework organizing anchoring relevant activity output n baseline data specific objective initial starting point briefly described absence hard quantitative baseline data give qualitative descrip tion current situation defining baseline critical part monitoring evaluating performance impact programme n indicative activity objective list indicative activity provided order give sense range kind activity need implemented achieve expected output objective general result frame work need complete highly detailed must sufficient provide sense underlying strategy scope range action implemented n interval activity priority output precise time line preferably specific date date indicate expected level result achieved allow overview relevant component programme expected progress time achieved date n target monitoring indicator activity observable target objectively verifiable useful monitoring indicator indicator vary depending activity always quantitative example reduction perception violence useful 15 percent ex combatant success fully reintegrated n input activity output indication input cost general cost category used identify essential requirement include staff infrastructure equipment operating expense service contract grant consultancy etc", "ProcessedSent": "example reduction perception violence useful 15 percent ex combatant success fully reintegrated n input activity output indication input cost", "SentID": 2725 }, { "ParagraphID": 878, - "Paragraph": "The general results framework for a DDR programme should consist of the following elements (but not necessarily all of them) (see also Annex F for a general results framework for DDR that was used in Liberia): \\n Specific objectives and component outcomes: For each component of a DDR programme (i.e., disarmament, demobilization, reinsertion, reintegration, etc.), the main or longer\u00ad term strategic objectives should be clearly defined, together with the outcomes the UN is supporting. These provide a strategic framework for organizing and anchoring relevant activities and outputs; \\n Baseline data: For each specific objective, the initial starting point should be briefly described. In the absence of hard quantitative baseline data, give a qualitative descrip\u00ad tion of the current situation. Defining the baseline is a critical part of monitoring and evaluating the performance and impact of programmes; \\n Indicative activities: For each objective, a list of indicative activities should be provided in order to give a sense of the range and kind of activities that need to be implemented so as to achieve the expected outputs and objectives. For the general results frame\u00ad work, these do not need to be complete or highly detailed, but they must be sufficient to provide a sense of the underlying strategy, scope and range of actions that will be implemented; \\n Intervals: Activities and priority outputs should be have precise time\u00adlines (preferably specific dates). For each of these dates, indicate the expected level of result that should be achieved. This should allow an overview of how each relevant component of the programme is expected to progress over time and what has to be achieved by what date; \\n Targets and monitoring indicators: For each activity there should be an observable target, objectively verifiable and useful as a monitoring indicator. These indicators will vary depending on the activity, and they do not always have to be quantitative. For example, \u2018reduction in perceptions of violence\u2019 is as useful as \u201815 percent of ex\u00adcombatants success\u00ad fully reintegrated\u2019; \\n Inputs: For each activity or output there should be an indication of inputs and their costs. General cost categories should be used to identify the essential requirements, which can include staff, infrastructure, equipment, operating expenses, service contracts, grants, consultancies, etc.", + "Paragraph": "The general results framework for a DDR programme should consist of the following elements (but not necessarily all of them) (see also Annex F for a general results framework for DDR that was used in Liberia): \n Specific objectives and component outcomes: For each component of a DDR programme (i.e., disarmament, demobilization, reinsertion, reintegration, etc.), the main or longer\u00ad term strategic objectives should be clearly defined, together with the outcomes the UN is supporting. These provide a strategic framework for organizing and anchoring relevant activities and outputs; \n Baseline data: For each specific objective, the initial starting point should be briefly described. In the absence of hard quantitative baseline data, give a qualitative descrip\u00ad tion of the current situation. Defining the baseline is a critical part of monitoring and evaluating the performance and impact of programmes; \n Indicative activities: For each objective, a list of indicative activities should be provided in order to give a sense of the range and kind of activities that need to be implemented so as to achieve the expected outputs and objectives. For the general results frame\u00ad work, these do not need to be complete or highly detailed, but they must be sufficient to provide a sense of the underlying strategy, scope and range of actions that will be implemented; \n Intervals: Activities and priority outputs should be have precise time\u00adlines (preferably specific dates). For each of these dates, indicate the expected level of result that should be achieved. This should allow an overview of how each relevant component of the programme is expected to progress over time and what has to be achieved by what date; \n Targets and monitoring indicators: For each activity there should be an observable target, objectively verifiable and useful as a monitoring indicator. These indicators will vary depending on the activity, and they do not always have to be quantitative. For example, \u2018reduction in perceptions of violence\u2019 is as useful as \u201815 percent of ex\u00adcombatants success\u00ad fully reintegrated\u2019; \n Inputs: For each activity or output there should be an indication of inputs and their costs. General cost categories should be used to identify the essential requirements, which can include staff, infrastructure, equipment, operating expenses, service contracts, grants, consultancies, etc.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49195,7 +49195,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 881, - "Paragraph": "RBB has four main components: \\n the DDR objective statement, serving as the basis for developing programme activities and identifying benchmarks for success; \\n indicators of achievement, which measure performance, justify the resource requirements and are linked to outputs; \\n outputs, listing the activities that will be conducted in order to achieve the objective; \\n external factors, identifying factors outside of the programme manger\u2019s control that may have an impact on programme performance.", + "Paragraph": "RBB has four main components: \n the DDR objective statement, serving as the basis for developing programme activities and identifying benchmarks for success; \n indicators of achievement, which measure performance, justify the resource requirements and are linked to outputs; \n outputs, listing the activities that will be conducted in order to achieve the objective; \n external factors, identifying factors outside of the programme manger\u2019s control that may have an impact on programme performance.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49206,7 +49206,7 @@ "Heading2": "7.2. Peacekeeping results-based budgeting framework", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "RBB has four main components: \\n the DDR objective statement, serving as the basis for developing programme activities and identifying benchmarks for success; \\n indicators of achievement, which measure performance, justify the resource requirements and are linked to outputs; \\n outputs, listing the activities that will be conducted in order to achieve the objective; \\n external factors, identifying factors outside of the programme manger\u2019s control that may have an impact on programme performance.", + "Sentence": "RBB has four main components: \n the DDR objective statement, serving as the basis for developing programme activities and identifying benchmarks for success; \n indicators of achievement, which measure performance, justify the resource requirements and are linked to outputs; \n outputs, listing the activities that will be conducted in order to achieve the objective; \n external factors, identifying factors outside of the programme manger\u2019s control that may have an impact on programme performance.", "newParagraph": "rbb four main component n ddr objective statement serving basis developing programme activity identifying benchmark success n indicator achievement measure performance justify resource requirement linked output n output listing activity conducted order achieve objective n external factor identifying factor outside programme manger control may impact programme performance", "ProcessedSent": "rbb four main component n ddr objective statement serving basis developing programme activity identifying benchmark success n indicator achievement measure performance justify resource requirement linked output n output listing activity conducted order achieve objective n external factor identifying factor outside programme manger control may impact programme performance", "SentID": 2733 @@ -49249,7 +49249,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 883, - "Paragraph": "The DDR objective statement draws its legal foundation from Security Council mission mandates. It is important to note that the DDR objective will not be fully achieved in the lifetime of the peacekeeping mission, although certain activities such as the (limited) phys\u00ad ical disarmament of combatants may be completed. Other important aspects of DDR such as reintegration, the establishment of the legal framework, and the technical and logistic capacity to deal with small arms and light weapons often extend beyond the duration of a peacekeeping mission. In this regard, the objective statement must reflect the contribution of the peacekeeping mission to the \u2018progress towards\u2019 the DDR objective. An example of a DDR objective statement is as follows: \\n \u201cProgress towards the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of members of armed forces and groups, including meeting the specific needs of women and children associated with such groups, as well as weapons control and destruction.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "The DDR objective statement draws its legal foundation from Security Council mission mandates. It is important to note that the DDR objective will not be fully achieved in the lifetime of the peacekeeping mission, although certain activities such as the (limited) phys\u00ad ical disarmament of combatants may be completed. Other important aspects of DDR such as reintegration, the establishment of the legal framework, and the technical and logistic capacity to deal with small arms and light weapons often extend beyond the duration of a peacekeeping mission. In this regard, the objective statement must reflect the contribution of the peacekeeping mission to the \u2018progress towards\u2019 the DDR objective. An example of a DDR objective statement is as follows: \n \u201cProgress towards the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of members of armed forces and groups, including meeting the specific needs of women and children associated with such groups, as well as weapons control and destruction.\u201d", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49267,7 +49267,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 883, - "Paragraph": "The DDR objective statement draws its legal foundation from Security Council mission mandates. It is important to note that the DDR objective will not be fully achieved in the lifetime of the peacekeeping mission, although certain activities such as the (limited) phys\u00ad ical disarmament of combatants may be completed. Other important aspects of DDR such as reintegration, the establishment of the legal framework, and the technical and logistic capacity to deal with small arms and light weapons often extend beyond the duration of a peacekeeping mission. In this regard, the objective statement must reflect the contribution of the peacekeeping mission to the \u2018progress towards\u2019 the DDR objective. An example of a DDR objective statement is as follows: \\n \u201cProgress towards the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of members of armed forces and groups, including meeting the specific needs of women and children associated with such groups, as well as weapons control and destruction.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "The DDR objective statement draws its legal foundation from Security Council mission mandates. It is important to note that the DDR objective will not be fully achieved in the lifetime of the peacekeeping mission, although certain activities such as the (limited) phys\u00ad ical disarmament of combatants may be completed. Other important aspects of DDR such as reintegration, the establishment of the legal framework, and the technical and logistic capacity to deal with small arms and light weapons often extend beyond the duration of a peacekeeping mission. In this regard, the objective statement must reflect the contribution of the peacekeeping mission to the \u2018progress towards\u2019 the DDR objective. An example of a DDR objective statement is as follows: \n \u201cProgress towards the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of members of armed forces and groups, including meeting the specific needs of women and children associated with such groups, as well as weapons control and destruction.\u201d", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49285,7 +49285,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 883, - "Paragraph": "The DDR objective statement draws its legal foundation from Security Council mission mandates. It is important to note that the DDR objective will not be fully achieved in the lifetime of the peacekeeping mission, although certain activities such as the (limited) phys\u00ad ical disarmament of combatants may be completed. Other important aspects of DDR such as reintegration, the establishment of the legal framework, and the technical and logistic capacity to deal with small arms and light weapons often extend beyond the duration of a peacekeeping mission. In this regard, the objective statement must reflect the contribution of the peacekeeping mission to the \u2018progress towards\u2019 the DDR objective. An example of a DDR objective statement is as follows: \\n \u201cProgress towards the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of members of armed forces and groups, including meeting the specific needs of women and children associated with such groups, as well as weapons control and destruction.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "The DDR objective statement draws its legal foundation from Security Council mission mandates. It is important to note that the DDR objective will not be fully achieved in the lifetime of the peacekeeping mission, although certain activities such as the (limited) phys\u00ad ical disarmament of combatants may be completed. Other important aspects of DDR such as reintegration, the establishment of the legal framework, and the technical and logistic capacity to deal with small arms and light weapons often extend beyond the duration of a peacekeeping mission. In this regard, the objective statement must reflect the contribution of the peacekeeping mission to the \u2018progress towards\u2019 the DDR objective. An example of a DDR objective statement is as follows: \n \u201cProgress towards the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of members of armed forces and groups, including meeting the specific needs of women and children associated with such groups, as well as weapons control and destruction.\u201d", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49303,7 +49303,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 883, - "Paragraph": "The DDR objective statement draws its legal foundation from Security Council mission mandates. It is important to note that the DDR objective will not be fully achieved in the lifetime of the peacekeeping mission, although certain activities such as the (limited) phys\u00ad ical disarmament of combatants may be completed. Other important aspects of DDR such as reintegration, the establishment of the legal framework, and the technical and logistic capacity to deal with small arms and light weapons often extend beyond the duration of a peacekeeping mission. In this regard, the objective statement must reflect the contribution of the peacekeeping mission to the \u2018progress towards\u2019 the DDR objective. An example of a DDR objective statement is as follows: \\n \u201cProgress towards the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of members of armed forces and groups, including meeting the specific needs of women and children associated with such groups, as well as weapons control and destruction.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "The DDR objective statement draws its legal foundation from Security Council mission mandates. It is important to note that the DDR objective will not be fully achieved in the lifetime of the peacekeeping mission, although certain activities such as the (limited) phys\u00ad ical disarmament of combatants may be completed. Other important aspects of DDR such as reintegration, the establishment of the legal framework, and the technical and logistic capacity to deal with small arms and light weapons often extend beyond the duration of a peacekeeping mission. In this regard, the objective statement must reflect the contribution of the peacekeeping mission to the \u2018progress towards\u2019 the DDR objective. An example of a DDR objective statement is as follows: \n \u201cProgress towards the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of members of armed forces and groups, including meeting the specific needs of women and children associated with such groups, as well as weapons control and destruction.\u201d", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49321,7 +49321,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 883, - "Paragraph": "The DDR objective statement draws its legal foundation from Security Council mission mandates. It is important to note that the DDR objective will not be fully achieved in the lifetime of the peacekeeping mission, although certain activities such as the (limited) phys\u00ad ical disarmament of combatants may be completed. Other important aspects of DDR such as reintegration, the establishment of the legal framework, and the technical and logistic capacity to deal with small arms and light weapons often extend beyond the duration of a peacekeeping mission. In this regard, the objective statement must reflect the contribution of the peacekeeping mission to the \u2018progress towards\u2019 the DDR objective. An example of a DDR objective statement is as follows: \\n \u201cProgress towards the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of members of armed forces and groups, including meeting the specific needs of women and children associated with such groups, as well as weapons control and destruction.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "The DDR objective statement draws its legal foundation from Security Council mission mandates. It is important to note that the DDR objective will not be fully achieved in the lifetime of the peacekeeping mission, although certain activities such as the (limited) phys\u00ad ical disarmament of combatants may be completed. Other important aspects of DDR such as reintegration, the establishment of the legal framework, and the technical and logistic capacity to deal with small arms and light weapons often extend beyond the duration of a peacekeeping mission. In this regard, the objective statement must reflect the contribution of the peacekeeping mission to the \u2018progress towards\u2019 the DDR objective. An example of a DDR objective statement is as follows: \n \u201cProgress towards the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of members of armed forces and groups, including meeting the specific needs of women and children associated with such groups, as well as weapons control and destruction.\u201d", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49332,7 +49332,7 @@ "Heading2": "7.2. Peacekeeping results-based budgeting framework", "Heading3": "7.2.1. Developing an RBB framework", "Heading4": "7.2.1.1. The DDR objective statement", - "Sentence": "An example of a DDR objective statement is as follows: \\n \u201cProgress towards the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of members of armed forces and groups, including meeting the specific needs of women and children associated with such groups, as well as weapons control and destruction.\u201d", + "Sentence": "An example of a DDR objective statement is as follows: \n \u201cProgress towards the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of members of armed forces and groups, including meeting the specific needs of women and children associated with such groups, as well as weapons control and destruction.\u201d", "newParagraph": "ddr objective statement draw legal foundation security council mission mandate important note ddr objective fully achieved lifetime peacekeeping mission although certain activity limited phys ical disarmament combatant may completed important aspect ddr reintegration establishment legal framework technical logistic capacity deal small arm light weapon often extend beyond duration peacekeeping mission regard objective statement must reflect contribution peacekeeping mission progress towards ddr objective example ddr objective statement follows n progress towards disarmament demobilization reintegration member armed force group including meeting specific need woman child associated group well weapon control destruction ", "ProcessedSent": "example ddr objective statement follows n progress towards disarmament demobilization reintegration member armed force group including meeting specific need woman child associated group well weapon control destruction ", "SentID": 2740 @@ -49429,7 +49429,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 888, - "Paragraph": "Once a programme has been prepared, planning instruments should be developed that will aid practitioners (UN, non\u00adUN and the national government) to implement the planned activities and strategies. An actions or operations plan usually consists of four main elements: \\n Implementation methods: This consists of a narrative description of how each DDR com\u00ad ponent will be made operational within the framework of the programme, focusing on the precise sequencing of activities, operational requirements, logistic requirements, links with other mission components, key risks and factors that will reduce these risks. This section can be used by practitioners to guide implementation and operations and provide an overall framework for the other components of the operational and action plan; \\n Timing: There should be an overview of the time\u00adframe and schedule for implementation of DDR activities for each component of the programme, which provides an overall picture of the phasing and sequencing of programme implementation. This will provide practitioners with a quick overview of the activities, which is important for defining and planning resource requirements and allocations. An example of a time\u00adframe is included in Annex H; \\n Detailed work plan: A detailed work plan should also be included in the operational plan. It should break all programme activities down into their various tasks, and indi\u00ad cate who is responsible for different operational roles. The main categories of such a work plan should include: \\n\\n the activities to be implemented; \\n\\n a detailed description of individual tasks; \\n\\n the required inputs (human, material, financial); \\n\\n the actor \\n\\n responsible for funding each task; \\n\\n the actor responsible for logistic support; \\n\\n the actor responsible for staffing; \\n\\n the actor responsible for coordination\/supervision; \\n\\n the actor responsible for implementation; \\n\\n the expected time\u00adframe for implementation of task. \\n The work plan should be considered a dynamic document that should be updated periodically and used to guide DDR planners and practitioners on programme imple\u00ad mentation on a day\u00adto\u00adday basis. A generic work plan is included in Annex I; \\n Management arrangements: This section should detail the institutional arrangements established to provide strategic guidance, coordination and implementation of the programme (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures and IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR Programmes).", + "Paragraph": "Once a programme has been prepared, planning instruments should be developed that will aid practitioners (UN, non\u00adUN and the national government) to implement the planned activities and strategies. An actions or operations plan usually consists of four main elements: \n Implementation methods: This consists of a narrative description of how each DDR com\u00ad ponent will be made operational within the framework of the programme, focusing on the precise sequencing of activities, operational requirements, logistic requirements, links with other mission components, key risks and factors that will reduce these risks. This section can be used by practitioners to guide implementation and operations and provide an overall framework for the other components of the operational and action plan; \n Timing: There should be an overview of the time\u00adframe and schedule for implementation of DDR activities for each component of the programme, which provides an overall picture of the phasing and sequencing of programme implementation. This will provide practitioners with a quick overview of the activities, which is important for defining and planning resource requirements and allocations. An example of a time\u00adframe is included in Annex H; \n Detailed work plan: A detailed work plan should also be included in the operational plan. It should break all programme activities down into their various tasks, and indi\u00ad cate who is responsible for different operational roles. The main categories of such a work plan should include: \n\n the activities to be implemented; \n\n a detailed description of individual tasks; \n\n the required inputs (human, material, financial); \n\n the actor \n\n responsible for funding each task; \n\n the actor responsible for logistic support; \n\n the actor responsible for staffing; \n\n the actor responsible for coordination\/supervision; \n\n the actor responsible for implementation; \n\n the expected time\u00adframe for implementation of task. \n The work plan should be considered a dynamic document that should be updated periodically and used to guide DDR planners and practitioners on programme imple\u00ad mentation on a day\u00adto\u00adday basis. A generic work plan is included in Annex I; \n Management arrangements: This section should detail the institutional arrangements established to provide strategic guidance, coordination and implementation of the programme (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures and IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR Programmes).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49447,7 +49447,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 888, - "Paragraph": "Once a programme has been prepared, planning instruments should be developed that will aid practitioners (UN, non\u00adUN and the national government) to implement the planned activities and strategies. An actions or operations plan usually consists of four main elements: \\n Implementation methods: This consists of a narrative description of how each DDR com\u00ad ponent will be made operational within the framework of the programme, focusing on the precise sequencing of activities, operational requirements, logistic requirements, links with other mission components, key risks and factors that will reduce these risks. This section can be used by practitioners to guide implementation and operations and provide an overall framework for the other components of the operational and action plan; \\n Timing: There should be an overview of the time\u00adframe and schedule for implementation of DDR activities for each component of the programme, which provides an overall picture of the phasing and sequencing of programme implementation. This will provide practitioners with a quick overview of the activities, which is important for defining and planning resource requirements and allocations. An example of a time\u00adframe is included in Annex H; \\n Detailed work plan: A detailed work plan should also be included in the operational plan. It should break all programme activities down into their various tasks, and indi\u00ad cate who is responsible for different operational roles. The main categories of such a work plan should include: \\n\\n the activities to be implemented; \\n\\n a detailed description of individual tasks; \\n\\n the required inputs (human, material, financial); \\n\\n the actor \\n\\n responsible for funding each task; \\n\\n the actor responsible for logistic support; \\n\\n the actor responsible for staffing; \\n\\n the actor responsible for coordination\/supervision; \\n\\n the actor responsible for implementation; \\n\\n the expected time\u00adframe for implementation of task. \\n The work plan should be considered a dynamic document that should be updated periodically and used to guide DDR planners and practitioners on programme imple\u00ad mentation on a day\u00adto\u00adday basis. A generic work plan is included in Annex I; \\n Management arrangements: This section should detail the institutional arrangements established to provide strategic guidance, coordination and implementation of the programme (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures and IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR Programmes).", + "Paragraph": "Once a programme has been prepared, planning instruments should be developed that will aid practitioners (UN, non\u00adUN and the national government) to implement the planned activities and strategies. An actions or operations plan usually consists of four main elements: \n Implementation methods: This consists of a narrative description of how each DDR com\u00ad ponent will be made operational within the framework of the programme, focusing on the precise sequencing of activities, operational requirements, logistic requirements, links with other mission components, key risks and factors that will reduce these risks. This section can be used by practitioners to guide implementation and operations and provide an overall framework for the other components of the operational and action plan; \n Timing: There should be an overview of the time\u00adframe and schedule for implementation of DDR activities for each component of the programme, which provides an overall picture of the phasing and sequencing of programme implementation. This will provide practitioners with a quick overview of the activities, which is important for defining and planning resource requirements and allocations. An example of a time\u00adframe is included in Annex H; \n Detailed work plan: A detailed work plan should also be included in the operational plan. It should break all programme activities down into their various tasks, and indi\u00ad cate who is responsible for different operational roles. The main categories of such a work plan should include: \n\n the activities to be implemented; \n\n a detailed description of individual tasks; \n\n the required inputs (human, material, financial); \n\n the actor \n\n responsible for funding each task; \n\n the actor responsible for logistic support; \n\n the actor responsible for staffing; \n\n the actor responsible for coordination\/supervision; \n\n the actor responsible for implementation; \n\n the expected time\u00adframe for implementation of task. \n The work plan should be considered a dynamic document that should be updated periodically and used to guide DDR planners and practitioners on programme imple\u00ad mentation on a day\u00adto\u00adday basis. A generic work plan is included in Annex I; \n Management arrangements: This section should detail the institutional arrangements established to provide strategic guidance, coordination and implementation of the programme (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures and IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR Programmes).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49458,14 +49458,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "An actions or operations plan usually consists of four main elements: \\n Implementation methods: This consists of a narrative description of how each DDR com\u00ad ponent will be made operational within the framework of the programme, focusing on the precise sequencing of activities, operational requirements, logistic requirements, links with other mission components, key risks and factors that will reduce these risks.", + "Sentence": "An actions or operations plan usually consists of four main elements: \n Implementation methods: This consists of a narrative description of how each DDR com\u00ad ponent will be made operational within the framework of the programme, focusing on the precise sequencing of activities, operational requirements, logistic requirements, links with other mission components, key risks and factors that will reduce these risks.", "newParagraph": "programme prepared planning instrument developed aid practitioner un non un national government implement planned activity strategy action operation plan usually consists four main element n implementation method consists narrative description ddr com ponent made operational within framework programme focusing precise sequencing activity operational requirement logistic requirement link mission component key risk factor reduce risk section used practitioner guide implementation operation provide overall framework component operational action plan n timing overview time frame schedule implementation ddr activity component programme provides overall picture phasing sequencing programme implementation provide practitioner quick overview activity important defining planning resource requirement allocation example time frame included annex h n detailed work plan detailed work plan also included operational plan break programme activity various task indi cate responsible different operational role main category work plan include nn activity implemented nn detailed description individual task nn required input human material financial nn actor nn responsible funding task nn actor responsible logistic support nn actor responsible staffing nn actor responsible coordinationsupervision nn actor responsible implementation nn expected time frame implementation task n work plan considered dynamic document updated periodically used guide ddr planner practitioner programme imple mentation day day basis generic work plan included annex n management arrangement section detail institutional arrangement established provide strategic guidance coordination implementation programme also see iddrs 310 integrated ddr planning process structure iddrs 350 monitoring evaluation ddr programme", "ProcessedSent": "action operation plan usually consists four main element n implementation method consists narrative description ddr com ponent made operational within framework programme focusing precise sequencing activity operational requirement logistic requirement link mission component key risk factor reduce risk", "SentID": 2747 }, { "ParagraphID": 888, - "Paragraph": "Once a programme has been prepared, planning instruments should be developed that will aid practitioners (UN, non\u00adUN and the national government) to implement the planned activities and strategies. An actions or operations plan usually consists of four main elements: \\n Implementation methods: This consists of a narrative description of how each DDR com\u00ad ponent will be made operational within the framework of the programme, focusing on the precise sequencing of activities, operational requirements, logistic requirements, links with other mission components, key risks and factors that will reduce these risks. This section can be used by practitioners to guide implementation and operations and provide an overall framework for the other components of the operational and action plan; \\n Timing: There should be an overview of the time\u00adframe and schedule for implementation of DDR activities for each component of the programme, which provides an overall picture of the phasing and sequencing of programme implementation. This will provide practitioners with a quick overview of the activities, which is important for defining and planning resource requirements and allocations. An example of a time\u00adframe is included in Annex H; \\n Detailed work plan: A detailed work plan should also be included in the operational plan. It should break all programme activities down into their various tasks, and indi\u00ad cate who is responsible for different operational roles. The main categories of such a work plan should include: \\n\\n the activities to be implemented; \\n\\n a detailed description of individual tasks; \\n\\n the required inputs (human, material, financial); \\n\\n the actor \\n\\n responsible for funding each task; \\n\\n the actor responsible for logistic support; \\n\\n the actor responsible for staffing; \\n\\n the actor responsible for coordination\/supervision; \\n\\n the actor responsible for implementation; \\n\\n the expected time\u00adframe for implementation of task. \\n The work plan should be considered a dynamic document that should be updated periodically and used to guide DDR planners and practitioners on programme imple\u00ad mentation on a day\u00adto\u00adday basis. A generic work plan is included in Annex I; \\n Management arrangements: This section should detail the institutional arrangements established to provide strategic guidance, coordination and implementation of the programme (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures and IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR Programmes).", + "Paragraph": "Once a programme has been prepared, planning instruments should be developed that will aid practitioners (UN, non\u00adUN and the national government) to implement the planned activities and strategies. An actions or operations plan usually consists of four main elements: \n Implementation methods: This consists of a narrative description of how each DDR com\u00ad ponent will be made operational within the framework of the programme, focusing on the precise sequencing of activities, operational requirements, logistic requirements, links with other mission components, key risks and factors that will reduce these risks. This section can be used by practitioners to guide implementation and operations and provide an overall framework for the other components of the operational and action plan; \n Timing: There should be an overview of the time\u00adframe and schedule for implementation of DDR activities for each component of the programme, which provides an overall picture of the phasing and sequencing of programme implementation. This will provide practitioners with a quick overview of the activities, which is important for defining and planning resource requirements and allocations. An example of a time\u00adframe is included in Annex H; \n Detailed work plan: A detailed work plan should also be included in the operational plan. It should break all programme activities down into their various tasks, and indi\u00ad cate who is responsible for different operational roles. The main categories of such a work plan should include: \n\n the activities to be implemented; \n\n a detailed description of individual tasks; \n\n the required inputs (human, material, financial); \n\n the actor \n\n responsible for funding each task; \n\n the actor responsible for logistic support; \n\n the actor responsible for staffing; \n\n the actor responsible for coordination\/supervision; \n\n the actor responsible for implementation; \n\n the expected time\u00adframe for implementation of task. \n The work plan should be considered a dynamic document that should be updated periodically and used to guide DDR planners and practitioners on programme imple\u00ad mentation on a day\u00adto\u00adday basis. A generic work plan is included in Annex I; \n Management arrangements: This section should detail the institutional arrangements established to provide strategic guidance, coordination and implementation of the programme (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures and IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR Programmes).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49476,14 +49476,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This section can be used by practitioners to guide implementation and operations and provide an overall framework for the other components of the operational and action plan; \\n Timing: There should be an overview of the time\u00adframe and schedule for implementation of DDR activities for each component of the programme, which provides an overall picture of the phasing and sequencing of programme implementation.", + "Sentence": "This section can be used by practitioners to guide implementation and operations and provide an overall framework for the other components of the operational and action plan; \n Timing: There should be an overview of the time\u00adframe and schedule for implementation of DDR activities for each component of the programme, which provides an overall picture of the phasing and sequencing of programme implementation.", "newParagraph": "programme prepared planning instrument developed aid practitioner un non un national government implement planned activity strategy action operation plan usually consists four main element n implementation method consists narrative description ddr com ponent made operational within framework programme focusing precise sequencing activity operational requirement logistic requirement link mission component key risk factor reduce risk section used practitioner guide implementation operation provide overall framework component operational action plan n timing overview time frame schedule implementation ddr activity component programme provides overall picture phasing sequencing programme implementation provide practitioner quick overview activity important defining planning resource requirement allocation example time frame included annex h n detailed work plan detailed work plan also included operational plan break programme activity various task indi cate responsible different operational role main category work plan include nn activity implemented nn detailed description individual task nn required input human material financial nn actor nn responsible funding task nn actor responsible logistic support nn actor responsible staffing nn actor responsible coordinationsupervision nn actor responsible implementation nn expected time frame implementation task n work plan considered dynamic document updated periodically used guide ddr planner practitioner programme imple mentation day day basis generic work plan included annex n management arrangement section detail institutional arrangement established provide strategic guidance coordination implementation programme also see iddrs 310 integrated ddr planning process structure iddrs 350 monitoring evaluation ddr programme", "ProcessedSent": "section used practitioner guide implementation operation provide overall framework component operational action plan n timing overview time frame schedule implementation ddr activity component programme provides overall picture phasing sequencing programme implementation", "SentID": 2748 }, { "ParagraphID": 888, - "Paragraph": "Once a programme has been prepared, planning instruments should be developed that will aid practitioners (UN, non\u00adUN and the national government) to implement the planned activities and strategies. An actions or operations plan usually consists of four main elements: \\n Implementation methods: This consists of a narrative description of how each DDR com\u00ad ponent will be made operational within the framework of the programme, focusing on the precise sequencing of activities, operational requirements, logistic requirements, links with other mission components, key risks and factors that will reduce these risks. This section can be used by practitioners to guide implementation and operations and provide an overall framework for the other components of the operational and action plan; \\n Timing: There should be an overview of the time\u00adframe and schedule for implementation of DDR activities for each component of the programme, which provides an overall picture of the phasing and sequencing of programme implementation. This will provide practitioners with a quick overview of the activities, which is important for defining and planning resource requirements and allocations. An example of a time\u00adframe is included in Annex H; \\n Detailed work plan: A detailed work plan should also be included in the operational plan. It should break all programme activities down into their various tasks, and indi\u00ad cate who is responsible for different operational roles. The main categories of such a work plan should include: \\n\\n the activities to be implemented; \\n\\n a detailed description of individual tasks; \\n\\n the required inputs (human, material, financial); \\n\\n the actor \\n\\n responsible for funding each task; \\n\\n the actor responsible for logistic support; \\n\\n the actor responsible for staffing; \\n\\n the actor responsible for coordination\/supervision; \\n\\n the actor responsible for implementation; \\n\\n the expected time\u00adframe for implementation of task. \\n The work plan should be considered a dynamic document that should be updated periodically and used to guide DDR planners and practitioners on programme imple\u00ad mentation on a day\u00adto\u00adday basis. A generic work plan is included in Annex I; \\n Management arrangements: This section should detail the institutional arrangements established to provide strategic guidance, coordination and implementation of the programme (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures and IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR Programmes).", + "Paragraph": "Once a programme has been prepared, planning instruments should be developed that will aid practitioners (UN, non\u00adUN and the national government) to implement the planned activities and strategies. An actions or operations plan usually consists of four main elements: \n Implementation methods: This consists of a narrative description of how each DDR com\u00ad ponent will be made operational within the framework of the programme, focusing on the precise sequencing of activities, operational requirements, logistic requirements, links with other mission components, key risks and factors that will reduce these risks. This section can be used by practitioners to guide implementation and operations and provide an overall framework for the other components of the operational and action plan; \n Timing: There should be an overview of the time\u00adframe and schedule for implementation of DDR activities for each component of the programme, which provides an overall picture of the phasing and sequencing of programme implementation. This will provide practitioners with a quick overview of the activities, which is important for defining and planning resource requirements and allocations. An example of a time\u00adframe is included in Annex H; \n Detailed work plan: A detailed work plan should also be included in the operational plan. It should break all programme activities down into their various tasks, and indi\u00ad cate who is responsible for different operational roles. The main categories of such a work plan should include: \n\n the activities to be implemented; \n\n a detailed description of individual tasks; \n\n the required inputs (human, material, financial); \n\n the actor \n\n responsible for funding each task; \n\n the actor responsible for logistic support; \n\n the actor responsible for staffing; \n\n the actor responsible for coordination\/supervision; \n\n the actor responsible for implementation; \n\n the expected time\u00adframe for implementation of task. \n The work plan should be considered a dynamic document that should be updated periodically and used to guide DDR planners and practitioners on programme imple\u00ad mentation on a day\u00adto\u00adday basis. A generic work plan is included in Annex I; \n Management arrangements: This section should detail the institutional arrangements established to provide strategic guidance, coordination and implementation of the programme (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures and IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR Programmes).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49501,7 +49501,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 888, - "Paragraph": "Once a programme has been prepared, planning instruments should be developed that will aid practitioners (UN, non\u00adUN and the national government) to implement the planned activities and strategies. An actions or operations plan usually consists of four main elements: \\n Implementation methods: This consists of a narrative description of how each DDR com\u00ad ponent will be made operational within the framework of the programme, focusing on the precise sequencing of activities, operational requirements, logistic requirements, links with other mission components, key risks and factors that will reduce these risks. This section can be used by practitioners to guide implementation and operations and provide an overall framework for the other components of the operational and action plan; \\n Timing: There should be an overview of the time\u00adframe and schedule for implementation of DDR activities for each component of the programme, which provides an overall picture of the phasing and sequencing of programme implementation. This will provide practitioners with a quick overview of the activities, which is important for defining and planning resource requirements and allocations. An example of a time\u00adframe is included in Annex H; \\n Detailed work plan: A detailed work plan should also be included in the operational plan. It should break all programme activities down into their various tasks, and indi\u00ad cate who is responsible for different operational roles. The main categories of such a work plan should include: \\n\\n the activities to be implemented; \\n\\n a detailed description of individual tasks; \\n\\n the required inputs (human, material, financial); \\n\\n the actor \\n\\n responsible for funding each task; \\n\\n the actor responsible for logistic support; \\n\\n the actor responsible for staffing; \\n\\n the actor responsible for coordination\/supervision; \\n\\n the actor responsible for implementation; \\n\\n the expected time\u00adframe for implementation of task. \\n The work plan should be considered a dynamic document that should be updated periodically and used to guide DDR planners and practitioners on programme imple\u00ad mentation on a day\u00adto\u00adday basis. A generic work plan is included in Annex I; \\n Management arrangements: This section should detail the institutional arrangements established to provide strategic guidance, coordination and implementation of the programme (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures and IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR Programmes).", + "Paragraph": "Once a programme has been prepared, planning instruments should be developed that will aid practitioners (UN, non\u00adUN and the national government) to implement the planned activities and strategies. An actions or operations plan usually consists of four main elements: \n Implementation methods: This consists of a narrative description of how each DDR com\u00ad ponent will be made operational within the framework of the programme, focusing on the precise sequencing of activities, operational requirements, logistic requirements, links with other mission components, key risks and factors that will reduce these risks. This section can be used by practitioners to guide implementation and operations and provide an overall framework for the other components of the operational and action plan; \n Timing: There should be an overview of the time\u00adframe and schedule for implementation of DDR activities for each component of the programme, which provides an overall picture of the phasing and sequencing of programme implementation. This will provide practitioners with a quick overview of the activities, which is important for defining and planning resource requirements and allocations. An example of a time\u00adframe is included in Annex H; \n Detailed work plan: A detailed work plan should also be included in the operational plan. It should break all programme activities down into their various tasks, and indi\u00ad cate who is responsible for different operational roles. The main categories of such a work plan should include: \n\n the activities to be implemented; \n\n a detailed description of individual tasks; \n\n the required inputs (human, material, financial); \n\n the actor \n\n responsible for funding each task; \n\n the actor responsible for logistic support; \n\n the actor responsible for staffing; \n\n the actor responsible for coordination\/supervision; \n\n the actor responsible for implementation; \n\n the expected time\u00adframe for implementation of task. \n The work plan should be considered a dynamic document that should be updated periodically and used to guide DDR planners and practitioners on programme imple\u00ad mentation on a day\u00adto\u00adday basis. A generic work plan is included in Annex I; \n Management arrangements: This section should detail the institutional arrangements established to provide strategic guidance, coordination and implementation of the programme (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures and IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR Programmes).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49512,14 +49512,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "An example of a time\u00adframe is included in Annex H; \\n Detailed work plan: A detailed work plan should also be included in the operational plan.", + "Sentence": "An example of a time\u00adframe is included in Annex H; \n Detailed work plan: A detailed work plan should also be included in the operational plan.", "newParagraph": "programme prepared planning instrument developed aid practitioner un non un national government implement planned activity strategy action operation plan usually consists four main element n implementation method consists narrative description ddr com ponent made operational within framework programme focusing precise sequencing activity operational requirement logistic requirement link mission component key risk factor reduce risk section used practitioner guide implementation operation provide overall framework component operational action plan n timing overview time frame schedule implementation ddr activity component programme provides overall picture phasing sequencing programme implementation provide practitioner quick overview activity important defining planning resource requirement allocation example time frame included annex h n detailed work plan detailed work plan also included operational plan break programme activity various task indi cate responsible different operational role main category work plan include nn activity implemented nn detailed description individual task nn required input human material financial nn actor nn responsible funding task nn actor responsible logistic support nn actor responsible staffing nn actor responsible coordinationsupervision nn actor responsible implementation nn expected time frame implementation task n work plan considered dynamic document updated periodically used guide ddr planner practitioner programme imple mentation day day basis generic work plan included annex n management arrangement section detail institutional arrangement established provide strategic guidance coordination implementation programme also see iddrs 310 integrated ddr planning process structure iddrs 350 monitoring evaluation ddr programme", "ProcessedSent": "example time frame included annex h n detailed work plan detailed work plan also included operational plan", "SentID": 2750 }, { "ParagraphID": 888, - "Paragraph": "Once a programme has been prepared, planning instruments should be developed that will aid practitioners (UN, non\u00adUN and the national government) to implement the planned activities and strategies. An actions or operations plan usually consists of four main elements: \\n Implementation methods: This consists of a narrative description of how each DDR com\u00ad ponent will be made operational within the framework of the programme, focusing on the precise sequencing of activities, operational requirements, logistic requirements, links with other mission components, key risks and factors that will reduce these risks. This section can be used by practitioners to guide implementation and operations and provide an overall framework for the other components of the operational and action plan; \\n Timing: There should be an overview of the time\u00adframe and schedule for implementation of DDR activities for each component of the programme, which provides an overall picture of the phasing and sequencing of programme implementation. This will provide practitioners with a quick overview of the activities, which is important for defining and planning resource requirements and allocations. An example of a time\u00adframe is included in Annex H; \\n Detailed work plan: A detailed work plan should also be included in the operational plan. It should break all programme activities down into their various tasks, and indi\u00ad cate who is responsible for different operational roles. The main categories of such a work plan should include: \\n\\n the activities to be implemented; \\n\\n a detailed description of individual tasks; \\n\\n the required inputs (human, material, financial); \\n\\n the actor \\n\\n responsible for funding each task; \\n\\n the actor responsible for logistic support; \\n\\n the actor responsible for staffing; \\n\\n the actor responsible for coordination\/supervision; \\n\\n the actor responsible for implementation; \\n\\n the expected time\u00adframe for implementation of task. \\n The work plan should be considered a dynamic document that should be updated periodically and used to guide DDR planners and practitioners on programme imple\u00ad mentation on a day\u00adto\u00adday basis. A generic work plan is included in Annex I; \\n Management arrangements: This section should detail the institutional arrangements established to provide strategic guidance, coordination and implementation of the programme (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures and IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR Programmes).", + "Paragraph": "Once a programme has been prepared, planning instruments should be developed that will aid practitioners (UN, non\u00adUN and the national government) to implement the planned activities and strategies. An actions or operations plan usually consists of four main elements: \n Implementation methods: This consists of a narrative description of how each DDR com\u00ad ponent will be made operational within the framework of the programme, focusing on the precise sequencing of activities, operational requirements, logistic requirements, links with other mission components, key risks and factors that will reduce these risks. This section can be used by practitioners to guide implementation and operations and provide an overall framework for the other components of the operational and action plan; \n Timing: There should be an overview of the time\u00adframe and schedule for implementation of DDR activities for each component of the programme, which provides an overall picture of the phasing and sequencing of programme implementation. This will provide practitioners with a quick overview of the activities, which is important for defining and planning resource requirements and allocations. An example of a time\u00adframe is included in Annex H; \n Detailed work plan: A detailed work plan should also be included in the operational plan. It should break all programme activities down into their various tasks, and indi\u00ad cate who is responsible for different operational roles. The main categories of such a work plan should include: \n\n the activities to be implemented; \n\n a detailed description of individual tasks; \n\n the required inputs (human, material, financial); \n\n the actor \n\n responsible for funding each task; \n\n the actor responsible for logistic support; \n\n the actor responsible for staffing; \n\n the actor responsible for coordination\/supervision; \n\n the actor responsible for implementation; \n\n the expected time\u00adframe for implementation of task. \n The work plan should be considered a dynamic document that should be updated periodically and used to guide DDR planners and practitioners on programme imple\u00ad mentation on a day\u00adto\u00adday basis. A generic work plan is included in Annex I; \n Management arrangements: This section should detail the institutional arrangements established to provide strategic guidance, coordination and implementation of the programme (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures and IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR Programmes).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49537,7 +49537,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 888, - "Paragraph": "Once a programme has been prepared, planning instruments should be developed that will aid practitioners (UN, non\u00adUN and the national government) to implement the planned activities and strategies. An actions or operations plan usually consists of four main elements: \\n Implementation methods: This consists of a narrative description of how each DDR com\u00ad ponent will be made operational within the framework of the programme, focusing on the precise sequencing of activities, operational requirements, logistic requirements, links with other mission components, key risks and factors that will reduce these risks. This section can be used by practitioners to guide implementation and operations and provide an overall framework for the other components of the operational and action plan; \\n Timing: There should be an overview of the time\u00adframe and schedule for implementation of DDR activities for each component of the programme, which provides an overall picture of the phasing and sequencing of programme implementation. This will provide practitioners with a quick overview of the activities, which is important for defining and planning resource requirements and allocations. An example of a time\u00adframe is included in Annex H; \\n Detailed work plan: A detailed work plan should also be included in the operational plan. It should break all programme activities down into their various tasks, and indi\u00ad cate who is responsible for different operational roles. The main categories of such a work plan should include: \\n\\n the activities to be implemented; \\n\\n a detailed description of individual tasks; \\n\\n the required inputs (human, material, financial); \\n\\n the actor \\n\\n responsible for funding each task; \\n\\n the actor responsible for logistic support; \\n\\n the actor responsible for staffing; \\n\\n the actor responsible for coordination\/supervision; \\n\\n the actor responsible for implementation; \\n\\n the expected time\u00adframe for implementation of task. \\n The work plan should be considered a dynamic document that should be updated periodically and used to guide DDR planners and practitioners on programme imple\u00ad mentation on a day\u00adto\u00adday basis. A generic work plan is included in Annex I; \\n Management arrangements: This section should detail the institutional arrangements established to provide strategic guidance, coordination and implementation of the programme (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures and IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR Programmes).", + "Paragraph": "Once a programme has been prepared, planning instruments should be developed that will aid practitioners (UN, non\u00adUN and the national government) to implement the planned activities and strategies. An actions or operations plan usually consists of four main elements: \n Implementation methods: This consists of a narrative description of how each DDR com\u00ad ponent will be made operational within the framework of the programme, focusing on the precise sequencing of activities, operational requirements, logistic requirements, links with other mission components, key risks and factors that will reduce these risks. This section can be used by practitioners to guide implementation and operations and provide an overall framework for the other components of the operational and action plan; \n Timing: There should be an overview of the time\u00adframe and schedule for implementation of DDR activities for each component of the programme, which provides an overall picture of the phasing and sequencing of programme implementation. This will provide practitioners with a quick overview of the activities, which is important for defining and planning resource requirements and allocations. An example of a time\u00adframe is included in Annex H; \n Detailed work plan: A detailed work plan should also be included in the operational plan. It should break all programme activities down into their various tasks, and indi\u00ad cate who is responsible for different operational roles. The main categories of such a work plan should include: \n\n the activities to be implemented; \n\n a detailed description of individual tasks; \n\n the required inputs (human, material, financial); \n\n the actor \n\n responsible for funding each task; \n\n the actor responsible for logistic support; \n\n the actor responsible for staffing; \n\n the actor responsible for coordination\/supervision; \n\n the actor responsible for implementation; \n\n the expected time\u00adframe for implementation of task. \n The work plan should be considered a dynamic document that should be updated periodically and used to guide DDR planners and practitioners on programme imple\u00ad mentation on a day\u00adto\u00adday basis. A generic work plan is included in Annex I; \n Management arrangements: This section should detail the institutional arrangements established to provide strategic guidance, coordination and implementation of the programme (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures and IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR Programmes).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49548,14 +49548,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The main categories of such a work plan should include: \\n\\n the activities to be implemented; \\n\\n a detailed description of individual tasks; \\n\\n the required inputs (human, material, financial); \\n\\n the actor \\n\\n responsible for funding each task; \\n\\n the actor responsible for logistic support; \\n\\n the actor responsible for staffing; \\n\\n the actor responsible for coordination\/supervision; \\n\\n the actor responsible for implementation; \\n\\n the expected time\u00adframe for implementation of task.", + "Sentence": "The main categories of such a work plan should include: \n\n the activities to be implemented; \n\n a detailed description of individual tasks; \n\n the required inputs (human, material, financial); \n\n the actor \n\n responsible for funding each task; \n\n the actor responsible for logistic support; \n\n the actor responsible for staffing; \n\n the actor responsible for coordination\/supervision; \n\n the actor responsible for implementation; \n\n the expected time\u00adframe for implementation of task.", "newParagraph": "programme prepared planning instrument developed aid practitioner un non un national government implement planned activity strategy action operation plan usually consists four main element n implementation method consists narrative description ddr com ponent made operational within framework programme focusing precise sequencing activity operational requirement logistic requirement link mission component key risk factor reduce risk section used practitioner guide implementation operation provide overall framework component operational action plan n timing overview time frame schedule implementation ddr activity component programme provides overall picture phasing sequencing programme implementation provide practitioner quick overview activity important defining planning resource requirement allocation example time frame included annex h n detailed work plan detailed work plan also included operational plan break programme activity various task indi cate responsible different operational role main category work plan include nn activity implemented nn detailed description individual task nn required input human material financial nn actor nn responsible funding task nn actor responsible logistic support nn actor responsible staffing nn actor responsible coordinationsupervision nn actor responsible implementation nn expected time frame implementation task n work plan considered dynamic document updated periodically used guide ddr planner practitioner programme imple mentation day day basis generic work plan included annex n management arrangement section detail institutional arrangement established provide strategic guidance coordination implementation programme also see iddrs 310 integrated ddr planning process structure iddrs 350 monitoring evaluation ddr programme", "ProcessedSent": "main category work plan include nn activity implemented nn detailed description individual task nn required input human material financial nn actor nn responsible funding task nn actor responsible logistic support nn actor responsible staffing nn actor responsible coordinationsupervision nn actor responsible implementation nn expected time frame implementation task", "SentID": 2752 }, { "ParagraphID": 888, - "Paragraph": "Once a programme has been prepared, planning instruments should be developed that will aid practitioners (UN, non\u00adUN and the national government) to implement the planned activities and strategies. An actions or operations plan usually consists of four main elements: \\n Implementation methods: This consists of a narrative description of how each DDR com\u00ad ponent will be made operational within the framework of the programme, focusing on the precise sequencing of activities, operational requirements, logistic requirements, links with other mission components, key risks and factors that will reduce these risks. This section can be used by practitioners to guide implementation and operations and provide an overall framework for the other components of the operational and action plan; \\n Timing: There should be an overview of the time\u00adframe and schedule for implementation of DDR activities for each component of the programme, which provides an overall picture of the phasing and sequencing of programme implementation. This will provide practitioners with a quick overview of the activities, which is important for defining and planning resource requirements and allocations. An example of a time\u00adframe is included in Annex H; \\n Detailed work plan: A detailed work plan should also be included in the operational plan. It should break all programme activities down into their various tasks, and indi\u00ad cate who is responsible for different operational roles. The main categories of such a work plan should include: \\n\\n the activities to be implemented; \\n\\n a detailed description of individual tasks; \\n\\n the required inputs (human, material, financial); \\n\\n the actor \\n\\n responsible for funding each task; \\n\\n the actor responsible for logistic support; \\n\\n the actor responsible for staffing; \\n\\n the actor responsible for coordination\/supervision; \\n\\n the actor responsible for implementation; \\n\\n the expected time\u00adframe for implementation of task. \\n The work plan should be considered a dynamic document that should be updated periodically and used to guide DDR planners and practitioners on programme imple\u00ad mentation on a day\u00adto\u00adday basis. A generic work plan is included in Annex I; \\n Management arrangements: This section should detail the institutional arrangements established to provide strategic guidance, coordination and implementation of the programme (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures and IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR Programmes).", + "Paragraph": "Once a programme has been prepared, planning instruments should be developed that will aid practitioners (UN, non\u00adUN and the national government) to implement the planned activities and strategies. An actions or operations plan usually consists of four main elements: \n Implementation methods: This consists of a narrative description of how each DDR com\u00ad ponent will be made operational within the framework of the programme, focusing on the precise sequencing of activities, operational requirements, logistic requirements, links with other mission components, key risks and factors that will reduce these risks. This section can be used by practitioners to guide implementation and operations and provide an overall framework for the other components of the operational and action plan; \n Timing: There should be an overview of the time\u00adframe and schedule for implementation of DDR activities for each component of the programme, which provides an overall picture of the phasing and sequencing of programme implementation. This will provide practitioners with a quick overview of the activities, which is important for defining and planning resource requirements and allocations. An example of a time\u00adframe is included in Annex H; \n Detailed work plan: A detailed work plan should also be included in the operational plan. It should break all programme activities down into their various tasks, and indi\u00ad cate who is responsible for different operational roles. The main categories of such a work plan should include: \n\n the activities to be implemented; \n\n a detailed description of individual tasks; \n\n the required inputs (human, material, financial); \n\n the actor \n\n responsible for funding each task; \n\n the actor responsible for logistic support; \n\n the actor responsible for staffing; \n\n the actor responsible for coordination\/supervision; \n\n the actor responsible for implementation; \n\n the expected time\u00adframe for implementation of task. \n The work plan should be considered a dynamic document that should be updated periodically and used to guide DDR planners and practitioners on programme imple\u00ad mentation on a day\u00adto\u00adday basis. A generic work plan is included in Annex I; \n Management arrangements: This section should detail the institutional arrangements established to provide strategic guidance, coordination and implementation of the programme (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures and IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR Programmes).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49566,14 +49566,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The work plan should be considered a dynamic document that should be updated periodically and used to guide DDR planners and practitioners on programme imple\u00ad mentation on a day\u00adto\u00adday basis.", + "Sentence": "\n The work plan should be considered a dynamic document that should be updated periodically and used to guide DDR planners and practitioners on programme imple\u00ad mentation on a day\u00adto\u00adday basis.", "newParagraph": "programme prepared planning instrument developed aid practitioner un non un national government implement planned activity strategy action operation plan usually consists four main element n implementation method consists narrative description ddr com ponent made operational within framework programme focusing precise sequencing activity operational requirement logistic requirement link mission component key risk factor reduce risk section used practitioner guide implementation operation provide overall framework component operational action plan n timing overview time frame schedule implementation ddr activity component programme provides overall picture phasing sequencing programme implementation provide practitioner quick overview activity important defining planning resource requirement allocation example time frame included annex h n detailed work plan detailed work plan also included operational plan break programme activity various task indi cate responsible different operational role main category work plan include nn activity implemented nn detailed description individual task nn required input human material financial nn actor nn responsible funding task nn actor responsible logistic support nn actor responsible staffing nn actor responsible coordinationsupervision nn actor responsible implementation nn expected time frame implementation task n work plan considered dynamic document updated periodically used guide ddr planner practitioner programme imple mentation day day basis generic work plan included annex n management arrangement section detail institutional arrangement established provide strategic guidance coordination implementation programme also see iddrs 310 integrated ddr planning process structure iddrs 350 monitoring evaluation ddr programme", "ProcessedSent": "n work plan considered dynamic document updated periodically used guide ddr planner practitioner programme imple mentation day day basis", "SentID": 2753 }, { "ParagraphID": 888, - "Paragraph": "Once a programme has been prepared, planning instruments should be developed that will aid practitioners (UN, non\u00adUN and the national government) to implement the planned activities and strategies. An actions or operations plan usually consists of four main elements: \\n Implementation methods: This consists of a narrative description of how each DDR com\u00ad ponent will be made operational within the framework of the programme, focusing on the precise sequencing of activities, operational requirements, logistic requirements, links with other mission components, key risks and factors that will reduce these risks. This section can be used by practitioners to guide implementation and operations and provide an overall framework for the other components of the operational and action plan; \\n Timing: There should be an overview of the time\u00adframe and schedule for implementation of DDR activities for each component of the programme, which provides an overall picture of the phasing and sequencing of programme implementation. This will provide practitioners with a quick overview of the activities, which is important for defining and planning resource requirements and allocations. An example of a time\u00adframe is included in Annex H; \\n Detailed work plan: A detailed work plan should also be included in the operational plan. It should break all programme activities down into their various tasks, and indi\u00ad cate who is responsible for different operational roles. The main categories of such a work plan should include: \\n\\n the activities to be implemented; \\n\\n a detailed description of individual tasks; \\n\\n the required inputs (human, material, financial); \\n\\n the actor \\n\\n responsible for funding each task; \\n\\n the actor responsible for logistic support; \\n\\n the actor responsible for staffing; \\n\\n the actor responsible for coordination\/supervision; \\n\\n the actor responsible for implementation; \\n\\n the expected time\u00adframe for implementation of task. \\n The work plan should be considered a dynamic document that should be updated periodically and used to guide DDR planners and practitioners on programme imple\u00ad mentation on a day\u00adto\u00adday basis. A generic work plan is included in Annex I; \\n Management arrangements: This section should detail the institutional arrangements established to provide strategic guidance, coordination and implementation of the programme (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures and IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR Programmes).", + "Paragraph": "Once a programme has been prepared, planning instruments should be developed that will aid practitioners (UN, non\u00adUN and the national government) to implement the planned activities and strategies. An actions or operations plan usually consists of four main elements: \n Implementation methods: This consists of a narrative description of how each DDR com\u00ad ponent will be made operational within the framework of the programme, focusing on the precise sequencing of activities, operational requirements, logistic requirements, links with other mission components, key risks and factors that will reduce these risks. This section can be used by practitioners to guide implementation and operations and provide an overall framework for the other components of the operational and action plan; \n Timing: There should be an overview of the time\u00adframe and schedule for implementation of DDR activities for each component of the programme, which provides an overall picture of the phasing and sequencing of programme implementation. This will provide practitioners with a quick overview of the activities, which is important for defining and planning resource requirements and allocations. An example of a time\u00adframe is included in Annex H; \n Detailed work plan: A detailed work plan should also be included in the operational plan. It should break all programme activities down into their various tasks, and indi\u00ad cate who is responsible for different operational roles. The main categories of such a work plan should include: \n\n the activities to be implemented; \n\n a detailed description of individual tasks; \n\n the required inputs (human, material, financial); \n\n the actor \n\n responsible for funding each task; \n\n the actor responsible for logistic support; \n\n the actor responsible for staffing; \n\n the actor responsible for coordination\/supervision; \n\n the actor responsible for implementation; \n\n the expected time\u00adframe for implementation of task. \n The work plan should be considered a dynamic document that should be updated periodically and used to guide DDR planners and practitioners on programme imple\u00ad mentation on a day\u00adto\u00adday basis. A generic work plan is included in Annex I; \n Management arrangements: This section should detail the institutional arrangements established to provide strategic guidance, coordination and implementation of the programme (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures and IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR Programmes).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49584,14 +49584,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "A generic work plan is included in Annex I; \\n Management arrangements: This section should detail the institutional arrangements established to provide strategic guidance, coordination and implementation of the programme (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures and IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR Programmes).", + "Sentence": "A generic work plan is included in Annex I; \n Management arrangements: This section should detail the institutional arrangements established to provide strategic guidance, coordination and implementation of the programme (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures and IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR Programmes).", "newParagraph": "programme prepared planning instrument developed aid practitioner un non un national government implement planned activity strategy action operation plan usually consists four main element n implementation method consists narrative description ddr com ponent made operational within framework programme focusing precise sequencing activity operational requirement logistic requirement link mission component key risk factor reduce risk section used practitioner guide implementation operation provide overall framework component operational action plan n timing overview time frame schedule implementation ddr activity component programme provides overall picture phasing sequencing programme implementation provide practitioner quick overview activity important defining planning resource requirement allocation example time frame included annex h n detailed work plan detailed work plan also included operational plan break programme activity various task indi cate responsible different operational role main category work plan include nn activity implemented nn detailed description individual task nn required input human material financial nn actor nn responsible funding task nn actor responsible logistic support nn actor responsible staffing nn actor responsible coordinationsupervision nn actor responsible implementation nn expected time frame implementation task n work plan considered dynamic document updated periodically used guide ddr planner practitioner programme imple mentation day day basis generic work plan included annex n management arrangement section detail institutional arrangement established provide strategic guidance coordination implementation programme also see iddrs 310 integrated ddr planning process structure iddrs 350 monitoring evaluation ddr programme", "ProcessedSent": "generic work plan included annex n management arrangement section detail institutional arrangement established provide strategic guidance coordination implementation programme also see iddrs 310 integrated ddr planning process structure iddrs 350 monitoring evaluation ddr programme", "SentID": 2754 }, { "ParagraphID": 889, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n Detailed field assessment: A detailed field assessment is essential to identify the nature of the problem a DDR programme is to deal with, as well as to provide key indicators for the development of a detailed DDR strategy and its associated components. Detailed field assess\u00ad ments shall be undertaken to ensure that DDR strategies, programmes and implementation plans reflect realities, are well targeted and sustainable, and to assist with their monitoring and evaluation.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n Detailed field assessment: A detailed field assessment is essential to identify the nature of the problem a DDR programme is to deal with, as well as to provide key indicators for the development of a detailed DDR strategy and its associated components. Detailed field assess\u00ad ments shall be undertaken to ensure that DDR strategies, programmes and implementation plans reflect realities, are well targeted and sustainable, and to assist with their monitoring and evaluation.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49602,14 +49602,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Terms and definitions \\n Detailed field assessment: A detailed field assessment is essential to identify the nature of the problem a DDR programme is to deal with, as well as to provide key indicators for the development of a detailed DDR strategy and its associated components.", + "Sentence": "Terms and definitions \n Detailed field assessment: A detailed field assessment is essential to identify the nature of the problem a DDR programme is to deal with, as well as to provide key indicators for the development of a detailed DDR strategy and its associated components.", "newParagraph": "term definition n detailed field assessment detailed field assessment essential identify nature problem ddr programme deal well provide key indicator development detailed ddr strategy associated component detailed field ass ments shall undertaken ensure ddr strategy programme implementation plan reflect reality well targeted sustainable assist monitoring evaluation", "ProcessedSent": "term definition n detailed field assessment detailed field assessment essential identify nature problem ddr programme deal well provide key indicator development detailed ddr strategy associated component", "SentID": 2755 }, { "ParagraphID": 889, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n Detailed field assessment: A detailed field assessment is essential to identify the nature of the problem a DDR programme is to deal with, as well as to provide key indicators for the development of a detailed DDR strategy and its associated components. Detailed field assess\u00ad ments shall be undertaken to ensure that DDR strategies, programmes and implementation plans reflect realities, are well targeted and sustainable, and to assist with their monitoring and evaluation.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n Detailed field assessment: A detailed field assessment is essential to identify the nature of the problem a DDR programme is to deal with, as well as to provide key indicators for the development of a detailed DDR strategy and its associated components. Detailed field assess\u00ad ments shall be undertaken to ensure that DDR strategies, programmes and implementation plans reflect realities, are well targeted and sustainable, and to assist with their monitoring and evaluation.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49627,7 +49627,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 890, - "Paragraph": "Implementation plan: \\n Also known as an operations or action plan, an implementation plan describes the detailed steps necessary to implement programme activities, together with a division of labour and overall time\u00adframe.", + "Paragraph": "Implementation plan: \n Also known as an operations or action plan, an implementation plan describes the detailed steps necessary to implement programme activities, together with a division of labour and overall time\u00adframe.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49638,14 +49638,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Implementation plan: \\n Also known as an operations or action plan, an implementation plan describes the detailed steps necessary to implement programme activities, together with a division of labour and overall time\u00adframe.", + "Sentence": "Implementation plan: \n Also known as an operations or action plan, an implementation plan describes the detailed steps necessary to implement programme activities, together with a division of labour and overall time\u00adframe.", "newParagraph": "implementation plan n also known operation action plan implementation plan describes detailed step necessary implement programme activity together division labour overall time frame", "ProcessedSent": "implementation plan n also known operation action plan implementation plan describes detailed step necessary implement programme activity together division labour overall time frame", "SentID": 2757 }, { "ParagraphID": 891, - "Paragraph": "Programme: \\n A generic (general) term for a set of activities designed to achieve a specific objective. In order to ensure that a programme\u2019s results, outputs and overall outcome are reached, activities are often framed by a strategy, key principles and identified targets. Together, these indicate how the activities will be structured and implemented. Programmes also include a description of all aspects necessary to implement the planned activities, includ\u00ad ing inputs and resources (staff, equipment, funding, etc.), management arrangements, legal frameworks, partnerships and other risk analysis.", + "Paragraph": "Programme: \n A generic (general) term for a set of activities designed to achieve a specific objective. In order to ensure that a programme\u2019s results, outputs and overall outcome are reached, activities are often framed by a strategy, key principles and identified targets. Together, these indicate how the activities will be structured and implemented. Programmes also include a description of all aspects necessary to implement the planned activities, includ\u00ad ing inputs and resources (staff, equipment, funding, etc.), management arrangements, legal frameworks, partnerships and other risk analysis.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49656,14 +49656,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Programme: \\n A generic (general) term for a set of activities designed to achieve a specific objective.", + "Sentence": "Programme: \n A generic (general) term for a set of activities designed to achieve a specific objective.", "newParagraph": "programme n generic general term set activity designed achieve specific objective order ensure programme result output overall outcome reached activity often framed strategy key principle identified target together indicate activity structured implemented programme also include description aspect necessary implement planned activity includ ing input resource staff equipment funding etc management arrangement legal framework partnership risk analysis", "ProcessedSent": "programme n generic general term set activity designed achieve specific objective", "SentID": 2758 }, { "ParagraphID": 891, - "Paragraph": "Programme: \\n A generic (general) term for a set of activities designed to achieve a specific objective. In order to ensure that a programme\u2019s results, outputs and overall outcome are reached, activities are often framed by a strategy, key principles and identified targets. Together, these indicate how the activities will be structured and implemented. Programmes also include a description of all aspects necessary to implement the planned activities, includ\u00ad ing inputs and resources (staff, equipment, funding, etc.), management arrangements, legal frameworks, partnerships and other risk analysis.", + "Paragraph": "Programme: \n A generic (general) term for a set of activities designed to achieve a specific objective. In order to ensure that a programme\u2019s results, outputs and overall outcome are reached, activities are often framed by a strategy, key principles and identified targets. Together, these indicate how the activities will be structured and implemented. Programmes also include a description of all aspects necessary to implement the planned activities, includ\u00ad ing inputs and resources (staff, equipment, funding, etc.), management arrangements, legal frameworks, partnerships and other risk analysis.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49681,7 +49681,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 891, - "Paragraph": "Programme: \\n A generic (general) term for a set of activities designed to achieve a specific objective. In order to ensure that a programme\u2019s results, outputs and overall outcome are reached, activities are often framed by a strategy, key principles and identified targets. Together, these indicate how the activities will be structured and implemented. Programmes also include a description of all aspects necessary to implement the planned activities, includ\u00ad ing inputs and resources (staff, equipment, funding, etc.), management arrangements, legal frameworks, partnerships and other risk analysis.", + "Paragraph": "Programme: \n A generic (general) term for a set of activities designed to achieve a specific objective. In order to ensure that a programme\u2019s results, outputs and overall outcome are reached, activities are often framed by a strategy, key principles and identified targets. Together, these indicate how the activities will be structured and implemented. Programmes also include a description of all aspects necessary to implement the planned activities, includ\u00ad ing inputs and resources (staff, equipment, funding, etc.), management arrangements, legal frameworks, partnerships and other risk analysis.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49699,7 +49699,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 891, - "Paragraph": "Programme: \\n A generic (general) term for a set of activities designed to achieve a specific objective. In order to ensure that a programme\u2019s results, outputs and overall outcome are reached, activities are often framed by a strategy, key principles and identified targets. Together, these indicate how the activities will be structured and implemented. Programmes also include a description of all aspects necessary to implement the planned activities, includ\u00ad ing inputs and resources (staff, equipment, funding, etc.), management arrangements, legal frameworks, partnerships and other risk analysis.", + "Paragraph": "Programme: \n A generic (general) term for a set of activities designed to achieve a specific objective. In order to ensure that a programme\u2019s results, outputs and overall outcome are reached, activities are often framed by a strategy, key principles and identified targets. Together, these indicate how the activities will be structured and implemented. Programmes also include a description of all aspects necessary to implement the planned activities, includ\u00ad ing inputs and resources (staff, equipment, funding, etc.), management arrangements, legal frameworks, partnerships and other risk analysis.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49717,7 +49717,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 891, - "Paragraph": "Programme: \\n A generic (general) term for a set of activities designed to achieve a specific objective. In order to ensure that a programme\u2019s results, outputs and overall outcome are reached, activities are often framed by a strategy, key principles and identified targets. Together, these indicate how the activities will be structured and implemented. Programmes also include a description of all aspects necessary to implement the planned activities, includ\u00ad ing inputs and resources (staff, equipment, funding, etc.), management arrangements, legal frameworks, partnerships and other risk analysis.", + "Paragraph": "Programme: \n A generic (general) term for a set of activities designed to achieve a specific objective. In order to ensure that a programme\u2019s results, outputs and overall outcome are reached, activities are often framed by a strategy, key principles and identified targets. Together, these indicate how the activities will be structured and implemented. Programmes also include a description of all aspects necessary to implement the planned activities, includ\u00ad ing inputs and resources (staff, equipment, funding, etc.), management arrangements, legal frameworks, partnerships and other risk analysis.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49735,7 +49735,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 892, - "Paragraph": "Project: \\n Within each programme there may be several projects, each of which is a separately identified undertaking. A project is an intervention that consists of a set of planned, inter\u00ad related activities aimed at achieving defined objectives over a fixed time. A project\u2019s activities and objectives are normally given in a project document. This legal agreement binds the signatories to carry out the defined activities and to provide specific resources over a fixed period of time in order to reach agreed objectives.", + "Paragraph": "Project: \n Within each programme there may be several projects, each of which is a separately identified undertaking. A project is an intervention that consists of a set of planned, inter\u00ad related activities aimed at achieving defined objectives over a fixed time. A project\u2019s activities and objectives are normally given in a project document. This legal agreement binds the signatories to carry out the defined activities and to provide specific resources over a fixed period of time in order to reach agreed objectives.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49746,14 +49746,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Project: \\n Within each programme there may be several projects, each of which is a separately identified undertaking.", + "Sentence": "Project: \n Within each programme there may be several projects, each of which is a separately identified undertaking.", "newParagraph": "project n within programme may several project separately identified undertaking project intervention consists set planned inter related activity aimed achieving defined objective fixed time project activity objective normally given project document legal agreement bind signatory carry defined activity provide specific resource fixed period time order reach agreed objective", "ProcessedSent": "project n within programme may several project separately identified undertaking", "SentID": 2763 }, { "ParagraphID": 892, - "Paragraph": "Project: \\n Within each programme there may be several projects, each of which is a separately identified undertaking. A project is an intervention that consists of a set of planned, inter\u00ad related activities aimed at achieving defined objectives over a fixed time. A project\u2019s activities and objectives are normally given in a project document. This legal agreement binds the signatories to carry out the defined activities and to provide specific resources over a fixed period of time in order to reach agreed objectives.", + "Paragraph": "Project: \n Within each programme there may be several projects, each of which is a separately identified undertaking. A project is an intervention that consists of a set of planned, inter\u00ad related activities aimed at achieving defined objectives over a fixed time. A project\u2019s activities and objectives are normally given in a project document. This legal agreement binds the signatories to carry out the defined activities and to provide specific resources over a fixed period of time in order to reach agreed objectives.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49771,7 +49771,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 892, - "Paragraph": "Project: \\n Within each programme there may be several projects, each of which is a separately identified undertaking. A project is an intervention that consists of a set of planned, inter\u00ad related activities aimed at achieving defined objectives over a fixed time. A project\u2019s activities and objectives are normally given in a project document. This legal agreement binds the signatories to carry out the defined activities and to provide specific resources over a fixed period of time in order to reach agreed objectives.", + "Paragraph": "Project: \n Within each programme there may be several projects, each of which is a separately identified undertaking. A project is an intervention that consists of a set of planned, inter\u00ad related activities aimed at achieving defined objectives over a fixed time. A project\u2019s activities and objectives are normally given in a project document. This legal agreement binds the signatories to carry out the defined activities and to provide specific resources over a fixed period of time in order to reach agreed objectives.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49789,7 +49789,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 892, - "Paragraph": "Project: \\n Within each programme there may be several projects, each of which is a separately identified undertaking. A project is an intervention that consists of a set of planned, inter\u00ad related activities aimed at achieving defined objectives over a fixed time. A project\u2019s activities and objectives are normally given in a project document. This legal agreement binds the signatories to carry out the defined activities and to provide specific resources over a fixed period of time in order to reach agreed objectives.", + "Paragraph": "Project: \n Within each programme there may be several projects, each of which is a separately identified undertaking. A project is an intervention that consists of a set of planned, inter\u00ad related activities aimed at achieving defined objectives over a fixed time. A project\u2019s activities and objectives are normally given in a project document. This legal agreement binds the signatories to carry out the defined activities and to provide specific resources over a fixed period of time in order to reach agreed objectives.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49807,7 +49807,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 893, - "Paragraph": "1 PRA uses group animation and exercises to obtain information. Using PRA methods, local people carry out the data collection and analysis, with outsiders assisting with the process rather than control\u00ad ling it. This approach brings about shared learning between local people and outsiders; emphasizes local knowledge; and enables local people to make their own appraisal, analysis and plans. PRA was originally developed so as to enable development practitioners, government officials and local people to work together to plan context\u00adappropriate programmes. PRA\u00adtype exercises can also be used in other contexts such as in planning for DDR. \\n 2 LCA \u2013 Lusaka Ceasefire Accords, 1999; SCA \u2013 Sun City Accord, April 2002; DRA \u2013 DRC\/Rwanda Accords, July 2002. \\n 3 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \\n 4 DRC authorities. \\n 5 Privileged source. \\n 6 Unverified information. \\n 7 UNDP\/IOM registration records. \\n 8 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \\n 9 Government of Uganda sources, United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC). \\n 10 FNL estimated at 3,000 men (UNDP D3 report), located mainly in Burundi.", + "Paragraph": "1 PRA uses group animation and exercises to obtain information. Using PRA methods, local people carry out the data collection and analysis, with outsiders assisting with the process rather than control\u00ad ling it. This approach brings about shared learning between local people and outsiders; emphasizes local knowledge; and enables local people to make their own appraisal, analysis and plans. PRA was originally developed so as to enable development practitioners, government officials and local people to work together to plan context\u00adappropriate programmes. PRA\u00adtype exercises can also be used in other contexts such as in planning for DDR. \n 2 LCA \u2013 Lusaka Ceasefire Accords, 1999; SCA \u2013 Sun City Accord, April 2002; DRA \u2013 DRC\/Rwanda Accords, July 2002. \n 3 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \n 4 DRC authorities. \n 5 Privileged source. \n 6 Unverified information. \n 7 UNDP\/IOM registration records. \n 8 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \n 9 Government of Uganda sources, United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC). \n 10 FNL estimated at 3,000 men (UNDP D3 report), located mainly in Burundi.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49825,7 +49825,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 893, - "Paragraph": "1 PRA uses group animation and exercises to obtain information. Using PRA methods, local people carry out the data collection and analysis, with outsiders assisting with the process rather than control\u00ad ling it. This approach brings about shared learning between local people and outsiders; emphasizes local knowledge; and enables local people to make their own appraisal, analysis and plans. PRA was originally developed so as to enable development practitioners, government officials and local people to work together to plan context\u00adappropriate programmes. PRA\u00adtype exercises can also be used in other contexts such as in planning for DDR. \\n 2 LCA \u2013 Lusaka Ceasefire Accords, 1999; SCA \u2013 Sun City Accord, April 2002; DRA \u2013 DRC\/Rwanda Accords, July 2002. \\n 3 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \\n 4 DRC authorities. \\n 5 Privileged source. \\n 6 Unverified information. \\n 7 UNDP\/IOM registration records. \\n 8 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \\n 9 Government of Uganda sources, United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC). \\n 10 FNL estimated at 3,000 men (UNDP D3 report), located mainly in Burundi.", + "Paragraph": "1 PRA uses group animation and exercises to obtain information. Using PRA methods, local people carry out the data collection and analysis, with outsiders assisting with the process rather than control\u00ad ling it. This approach brings about shared learning between local people and outsiders; emphasizes local knowledge; and enables local people to make their own appraisal, analysis and plans. PRA was originally developed so as to enable development practitioners, government officials and local people to work together to plan context\u00adappropriate programmes. PRA\u00adtype exercises can also be used in other contexts such as in planning for DDR. \n 2 LCA \u2013 Lusaka Ceasefire Accords, 1999; SCA \u2013 Sun City Accord, April 2002; DRA \u2013 DRC\/Rwanda Accords, July 2002. \n 3 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \n 4 DRC authorities. \n 5 Privileged source. \n 6 Unverified information. \n 7 UNDP\/IOM registration records. \n 8 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \n 9 Government of Uganda sources, United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC). \n 10 FNL estimated at 3,000 men (UNDP D3 report), located mainly in Burundi.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49843,7 +49843,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 893, - "Paragraph": "1 PRA uses group animation and exercises to obtain information. Using PRA methods, local people carry out the data collection and analysis, with outsiders assisting with the process rather than control\u00ad ling it. This approach brings about shared learning between local people and outsiders; emphasizes local knowledge; and enables local people to make their own appraisal, analysis and plans. PRA was originally developed so as to enable development practitioners, government officials and local people to work together to plan context\u00adappropriate programmes. PRA\u00adtype exercises can also be used in other contexts such as in planning for DDR. \\n 2 LCA \u2013 Lusaka Ceasefire Accords, 1999; SCA \u2013 Sun City Accord, April 2002; DRA \u2013 DRC\/Rwanda Accords, July 2002. \\n 3 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \\n 4 DRC authorities. \\n 5 Privileged source. \\n 6 Unverified information. \\n 7 UNDP\/IOM registration records. \\n 8 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \\n 9 Government of Uganda sources, United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC). \\n 10 FNL estimated at 3,000 men (UNDP D3 report), located mainly in Burundi.", + "Paragraph": "1 PRA uses group animation and exercises to obtain information. Using PRA methods, local people carry out the data collection and analysis, with outsiders assisting with the process rather than control\u00ad ling it. This approach brings about shared learning between local people and outsiders; emphasizes local knowledge; and enables local people to make their own appraisal, analysis and plans. PRA was originally developed so as to enable development practitioners, government officials and local people to work together to plan context\u00adappropriate programmes. PRA\u00adtype exercises can also be used in other contexts such as in planning for DDR. \n 2 LCA \u2013 Lusaka Ceasefire Accords, 1999; SCA \u2013 Sun City Accord, April 2002; DRA \u2013 DRC\/Rwanda Accords, July 2002. \n 3 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \n 4 DRC authorities. \n 5 Privileged source. \n 6 Unverified information. \n 7 UNDP\/IOM registration records. \n 8 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \n 9 Government of Uganda sources, United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC). \n 10 FNL estimated at 3,000 men (UNDP D3 report), located mainly in Burundi.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49861,7 +49861,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 893, - "Paragraph": "1 PRA uses group animation and exercises to obtain information. Using PRA methods, local people carry out the data collection and analysis, with outsiders assisting with the process rather than control\u00ad ling it. This approach brings about shared learning between local people and outsiders; emphasizes local knowledge; and enables local people to make their own appraisal, analysis and plans. PRA was originally developed so as to enable development practitioners, government officials and local people to work together to plan context\u00adappropriate programmes. PRA\u00adtype exercises can also be used in other contexts such as in planning for DDR. \\n 2 LCA \u2013 Lusaka Ceasefire Accords, 1999; SCA \u2013 Sun City Accord, April 2002; DRA \u2013 DRC\/Rwanda Accords, July 2002. \\n 3 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \\n 4 DRC authorities. \\n 5 Privileged source. \\n 6 Unverified information. \\n 7 UNDP\/IOM registration records. \\n 8 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \\n 9 Government of Uganda sources, United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC). \\n 10 FNL estimated at 3,000 men (UNDP D3 report), located mainly in Burundi.", + "Paragraph": "1 PRA uses group animation and exercises to obtain information. Using PRA methods, local people carry out the data collection and analysis, with outsiders assisting with the process rather than control\u00ad ling it. This approach brings about shared learning between local people and outsiders; emphasizes local knowledge; and enables local people to make their own appraisal, analysis and plans. PRA was originally developed so as to enable development practitioners, government officials and local people to work together to plan context\u00adappropriate programmes. PRA\u00adtype exercises can also be used in other contexts such as in planning for DDR. \n 2 LCA \u2013 Lusaka Ceasefire Accords, 1999; SCA \u2013 Sun City Accord, April 2002; DRA \u2013 DRC\/Rwanda Accords, July 2002. \n 3 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \n 4 DRC authorities. \n 5 Privileged source. \n 6 Unverified information. \n 7 UNDP\/IOM registration records. \n 8 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \n 9 Government of Uganda sources, United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC). \n 10 FNL estimated at 3,000 men (UNDP D3 report), located mainly in Burundi.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49879,7 +49879,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 893, - "Paragraph": "1 PRA uses group animation and exercises to obtain information. Using PRA methods, local people carry out the data collection and analysis, with outsiders assisting with the process rather than control\u00ad ling it. This approach brings about shared learning between local people and outsiders; emphasizes local knowledge; and enables local people to make their own appraisal, analysis and plans. PRA was originally developed so as to enable development practitioners, government officials and local people to work together to plan context\u00adappropriate programmes. PRA\u00adtype exercises can also be used in other contexts such as in planning for DDR. \\n 2 LCA \u2013 Lusaka Ceasefire Accords, 1999; SCA \u2013 Sun City Accord, April 2002; DRA \u2013 DRC\/Rwanda Accords, July 2002. \\n 3 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \\n 4 DRC authorities. \\n 5 Privileged source. \\n 6 Unverified information. \\n 7 UNDP\/IOM registration records. \\n 8 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \\n 9 Government of Uganda sources, United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC). \\n 10 FNL estimated at 3,000 men (UNDP D3 report), located mainly in Burundi.", + "Paragraph": "1 PRA uses group animation and exercises to obtain information. Using PRA methods, local people carry out the data collection and analysis, with outsiders assisting with the process rather than control\u00ad ling it. This approach brings about shared learning between local people and outsiders; emphasizes local knowledge; and enables local people to make their own appraisal, analysis and plans. PRA was originally developed so as to enable development practitioners, government officials and local people to work together to plan context\u00adappropriate programmes. PRA\u00adtype exercises can also be used in other contexts such as in planning for DDR. \n 2 LCA \u2013 Lusaka Ceasefire Accords, 1999; SCA \u2013 Sun City Accord, April 2002; DRA \u2013 DRC\/Rwanda Accords, July 2002. \n 3 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \n 4 DRC authorities. \n 5 Privileged source. \n 6 Unverified information. \n 7 UNDP\/IOM registration records. \n 8 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \n 9 Government of Uganda sources, United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC). \n 10 FNL estimated at 3,000 men (UNDP D3 report), located mainly in Burundi.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49897,7 +49897,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 893, - "Paragraph": "1 PRA uses group animation and exercises to obtain information. Using PRA methods, local people carry out the data collection and analysis, with outsiders assisting with the process rather than control\u00ad ling it. This approach brings about shared learning between local people and outsiders; emphasizes local knowledge; and enables local people to make their own appraisal, analysis and plans. PRA was originally developed so as to enable development practitioners, government officials and local people to work together to plan context\u00adappropriate programmes. PRA\u00adtype exercises can also be used in other contexts such as in planning for DDR. \\n 2 LCA \u2013 Lusaka Ceasefire Accords, 1999; SCA \u2013 Sun City Accord, April 2002; DRA \u2013 DRC\/Rwanda Accords, July 2002. \\n 3 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \\n 4 DRC authorities. \\n 5 Privileged source. \\n 6 Unverified information. \\n 7 UNDP\/IOM registration records. \\n 8 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \\n 9 Government of Uganda sources, United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC). \\n 10 FNL estimated at 3,000 men (UNDP D3 report), located mainly in Burundi.", + "Paragraph": "1 PRA uses group animation and exercises to obtain information. Using PRA methods, local people carry out the data collection and analysis, with outsiders assisting with the process rather than control\u00ad ling it. This approach brings about shared learning between local people and outsiders; emphasizes local knowledge; and enables local people to make their own appraisal, analysis and plans. PRA was originally developed so as to enable development practitioners, government officials and local people to work together to plan context\u00adappropriate programmes. PRA\u00adtype exercises can also be used in other contexts such as in planning for DDR. \n 2 LCA \u2013 Lusaka Ceasefire Accords, 1999; SCA \u2013 Sun City Accord, April 2002; DRA \u2013 DRC\/Rwanda Accords, July 2002. \n 3 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \n 4 DRC authorities. \n 5 Privileged source. \n 6 Unverified information. \n 7 UNDP\/IOM registration records. \n 8 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \n 9 Government of Uganda sources, United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC). \n 10 FNL estimated at 3,000 men (UNDP D3 report), located mainly in Burundi.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49908,14 +49908,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 2 LCA \u2013 Lusaka Ceasefire Accords, 1999; SCA \u2013 Sun City Accord, April 2002; DRA \u2013 DRC\/Rwanda Accords, July 2002.", + "Sentence": "\n 2 LCA \u2013 Lusaka Ceasefire Accords, 1999; SCA \u2013 Sun City Accord, April 2002; DRA \u2013 DRC\/Rwanda Accords, July 2002.", "newParagraph": "1 pra us group animation exercise obtain information using pra method local people carry data collection analysis outsider assisting process rather control ling approach brings shared learning local people outsider emphasizes local knowledge enables local people make appraisal analysis plan pra originally developed enable development practitioner government official local people work together plan context appropriate programme pra type exercise also used context planning ddr n 2 lca lusaka ceasefire accord 1999 sca sun city accord april 2002 dra drcrwanda accord july 2002 n 3 undp d3 report 2001 n 4 drc authority n 5 privileged source n 6 unverified information n 7 undpiom registration record n 8 undp d3 report 2001 n 9 government uganda source united nation organization mission democratic republic congo monuc n 10 fnl estimated 3000 men undp d3 report located mainly burundi", "ProcessedSent": "n 2 lca lusaka ceasefire accord 1999 sca sun city accord april 2002 dra drcrwanda accord july 2002", "SentID": 2772 }, { "ParagraphID": 893, - "Paragraph": "1 PRA uses group animation and exercises to obtain information. Using PRA methods, local people carry out the data collection and analysis, with outsiders assisting with the process rather than control\u00ad ling it. This approach brings about shared learning between local people and outsiders; emphasizes local knowledge; and enables local people to make their own appraisal, analysis and plans. PRA was originally developed so as to enable development practitioners, government officials and local people to work together to plan context\u00adappropriate programmes. PRA\u00adtype exercises can also be used in other contexts such as in planning for DDR. \\n 2 LCA \u2013 Lusaka Ceasefire Accords, 1999; SCA \u2013 Sun City Accord, April 2002; DRA \u2013 DRC\/Rwanda Accords, July 2002. \\n 3 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \\n 4 DRC authorities. \\n 5 Privileged source. \\n 6 Unverified information. \\n 7 UNDP\/IOM registration records. \\n 8 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \\n 9 Government of Uganda sources, United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC). \\n 10 FNL estimated at 3,000 men (UNDP D3 report), located mainly in Burundi.", + "Paragraph": "1 PRA uses group animation and exercises to obtain information. Using PRA methods, local people carry out the data collection and analysis, with outsiders assisting with the process rather than control\u00ad ling it. This approach brings about shared learning between local people and outsiders; emphasizes local knowledge; and enables local people to make their own appraisal, analysis and plans. PRA was originally developed so as to enable development practitioners, government officials and local people to work together to plan context\u00adappropriate programmes. PRA\u00adtype exercises can also be used in other contexts such as in planning for DDR. \n 2 LCA \u2013 Lusaka Ceasefire Accords, 1999; SCA \u2013 Sun City Accord, April 2002; DRA \u2013 DRC\/Rwanda Accords, July 2002. \n 3 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \n 4 DRC authorities. \n 5 Privileged source. \n 6 Unverified information. \n 7 UNDP\/IOM registration records. \n 8 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \n 9 Government of Uganda sources, United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC). \n 10 FNL estimated at 3,000 men (UNDP D3 report), located mainly in Burundi.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49926,14 +49926,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 3 UNDP D3 report, 2001.", + "Sentence": "\n 3 UNDP D3 report, 2001.", "newParagraph": "1 pra us group animation exercise obtain information using pra method local people carry data collection analysis outsider assisting process rather control ling approach brings shared learning local people outsider emphasizes local knowledge enables local people make appraisal analysis plan pra originally developed enable development practitioner government official local people work together plan context appropriate programme pra type exercise also used context planning ddr n 2 lca lusaka ceasefire accord 1999 sca sun city accord april 2002 dra drcrwanda accord july 2002 n 3 undp d3 report 2001 n 4 drc authority n 5 privileged source n 6 unverified information n 7 undpiom registration record n 8 undp d3 report 2001 n 9 government uganda source united nation organization mission democratic republic congo monuc n 10 fnl estimated 3000 men undp d3 report located mainly burundi", "ProcessedSent": "n 3 undp d3 report 2001", "SentID": 2773 }, { "ParagraphID": 893, - "Paragraph": "1 PRA uses group animation and exercises to obtain information. Using PRA methods, local people carry out the data collection and analysis, with outsiders assisting with the process rather than control\u00ad ling it. This approach brings about shared learning between local people and outsiders; emphasizes local knowledge; and enables local people to make their own appraisal, analysis and plans. PRA was originally developed so as to enable development practitioners, government officials and local people to work together to plan context\u00adappropriate programmes. PRA\u00adtype exercises can also be used in other contexts such as in planning for DDR. \\n 2 LCA \u2013 Lusaka Ceasefire Accords, 1999; SCA \u2013 Sun City Accord, April 2002; DRA \u2013 DRC\/Rwanda Accords, July 2002. \\n 3 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \\n 4 DRC authorities. \\n 5 Privileged source. \\n 6 Unverified information. \\n 7 UNDP\/IOM registration records. \\n 8 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \\n 9 Government of Uganda sources, United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC). \\n 10 FNL estimated at 3,000 men (UNDP D3 report), located mainly in Burundi.", + "Paragraph": "1 PRA uses group animation and exercises to obtain information. Using PRA methods, local people carry out the data collection and analysis, with outsiders assisting with the process rather than control\u00ad ling it. This approach brings about shared learning between local people and outsiders; emphasizes local knowledge; and enables local people to make their own appraisal, analysis and plans. PRA was originally developed so as to enable development practitioners, government officials and local people to work together to plan context\u00adappropriate programmes. PRA\u00adtype exercises can also be used in other contexts such as in planning for DDR. \n 2 LCA \u2013 Lusaka Ceasefire Accords, 1999; SCA \u2013 Sun City Accord, April 2002; DRA \u2013 DRC\/Rwanda Accords, July 2002. \n 3 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \n 4 DRC authorities. \n 5 Privileged source. \n 6 Unverified information. \n 7 UNDP\/IOM registration records. \n 8 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \n 9 Government of Uganda sources, United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC). \n 10 FNL estimated at 3,000 men (UNDP D3 report), located mainly in Burundi.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49944,14 +49944,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 4 DRC authorities.", + "Sentence": "\n 4 DRC authorities.", "newParagraph": "1 pra us group animation exercise obtain information using pra method local people carry data collection analysis outsider assisting process rather control ling approach brings shared learning local people outsider emphasizes local knowledge enables local people make appraisal analysis plan pra originally developed enable development practitioner government official local people work together plan context appropriate programme pra type exercise also used context planning ddr n 2 lca lusaka ceasefire accord 1999 sca sun city accord april 2002 dra drcrwanda accord july 2002 n 3 undp d3 report 2001 n 4 drc authority n 5 privileged source n 6 unverified information n 7 undpiom registration record n 8 undp d3 report 2001 n 9 government uganda source united nation organization mission democratic republic congo monuc n 10 fnl estimated 3000 men undp d3 report located mainly burundi", "ProcessedSent": "n 4 drc authority", "SentID": 2774 }, { "ParagraphID": 893, - "Paragraph": "1 PRA uses group animation and exercises to obtain information. Using PRA methods, local people carry out the data collection and analysis, with outsiders assisting with the process rather than control\u00ad ling it. This approach brings about shared learning between local people and outsiders; emphasizes local knowledge; and enables local people to make their own appraisal, analysis and plans. PRA was originally developed so as to enable development practitioners, government officials and local people to work together to plan context\u00adappropriate programmes. PRA\u00adtype exercises can also be used in other contexts such as in planning for DDR. \\n 2 LCA \u2013 Lusaka Ceasefire Accords, 1999; SCA \u2013 Sun City Accord, April 2002; DRA \u2013 DRC\/Rwanda Accords, July 2002. \\n 3 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \\n 4 DRC authorities. \\n 5 Privileged source. \\n 6 Unverified information. \\n 7 UNDP\/IOM registration records. \\n 8 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \\n 9 Government of Uganda sources, United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC). \\n 10 FNL estimated at 3,000 men (UNDP D3 report), located mainly in Burundi.", + "Paragraph": "1 PRA uses group animation and exercises to obtain information. Using PRA methods, local people carry out the data collection and analysis, with outsiders assisting with the process rather than control\u00ad ling it. This approach brings about shared learning between local people and outsiders; emphasizes local knowledge; and enables local people to make their own appraisal, analysis and plans. PRA was originally developed so as to enable development practitioners, government officials and local people to work together to plan context\u00adappropriate programmes. PRA\u00adtype exercises can also be used in other contexts such as in planning for DDR. \n 2 LCA \u2013 Lusaka Ceasefire Accords, 1999; SCA \u2013 Sun City Accord, April 2002; DRA \u2013 DRC\/Rwanda Accords, July 2002. \n 3 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \n 4 DRC authorities. \n 5 Privileged source. \n 6 Unverified information. \n 7 UNDP\/IOM registration records. \n 8 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \n 9 Government of Uganda sources, United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC). \n 10 FNL estimated at 3,000 men (UNDP D3 report), located mainly in Burundi.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49962,14 +49962,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 5 Privileged source.", + "Sentence": "\n 5 Privileged source.", "newParagraph": "1 pra us group animation exercise obtain information using pra method local people carry data collection analysis outsider assisting process rather control ling approach brings shared learning local people outsider emphasizes local knowledge enables local people make appraisal analysis plan pra originally developed enable development practitioner government official local people work together plan context appropriate programme pra type exercise also used context planning ddr n 2 lca lusaka ceasefire accord 1999 sca sun city accord april 2002 dra drcrwanda accord july 2002 n 3 undp d3 report 2001 n 4 drc authority n 5 privileged source n 6 unverified information n 7 undpiom registration record n 8 undp d3 report 2001 n 9 government uganda source united nation organization mission democratic republic congo monuc n 10 fnl estimated 3000 men undp d3 report located mainly burundi", "ProcessedSent": "n 5 privileged source", "SentID": 2775 }, { "ParagraphID": 893, - "Paragraph": "1 PRA uses group animation and exercises to obtain information. Using PRA methods, local people carry out the data collection and analysis, with outsiders assisting with the process rather than control\u00ad ling it. This approach brings about shared learning between local people and outsiders; emphasizes local knowledge; and enables local people to make their own appraisal, analysis and plans. PRA was originally developed so as to enable development practitioners, government officials and local people to work together to plan context\u00adappropriate programmes. PRA\u00adtype exercises can also be used in other contexts such as in planning for DDR. \\n 2 LCA \u2013 Lusaka Ceasefire Accords, 1999; SCA \u2013 Sun City Accord, April 2002; DRA \u2013 DRC\/Rwanda Accords, July 2002. \\n 3 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \\n 4 DRC authorities. \\n 5 Privileged source. \\n 6 Unverified information. \\n 7 UNDP\/IOM registration records. \\n 8 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \\n 9 Government of Uganda sources, United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC). \\n 10 FNL estimated at 3,000 men (UNDP D3 report), located mainly in Burundi.", + "Paragraph": "1 PRA uses group animation and exercises to obtain information. Using PRA methods, local people carry out the data collection and analysis, with outsiders assisting with the process rather than control\u00ad ling it. This approach brings about shared learning between local people and outsiders; emphasizes local knowledge; and enables local people to make their own appraisal, analysis and plans. PRA was originally developed so as to enable development practitioners, government officials and local people to work together to plan context\u00adappropriate programmes. PRA\u00adtype exercises can also be used in other contexts such as in planning for DDR. \n 2 LCA \u2013 Lusaka Ceasefire Accords, 1999; SCA \u2013 Sun City Accord, April 2002; DRA \u2013 DRC\/Rwanda Accords, July 2002. \n 3 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \n 4 DRC authorities. \n 5 Privileged source. \n 6 Unverified information. \n 7 UNDP\/IOM registration records. \n 8 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \n 9 Government of Uganda sources, United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC). \n 10 FNL estimated at 3,000 men (UNDP D3 report), located mainly in Burundi.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49980,14 +49980,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 6 Unverified information.", + "Sentence": "\n 6 Unverified information.", "newParagraph": "1 pra us group animation exercise obtain information using pra method local people carry data collection analysis outsider assisting process rather control ling approach brings shared learning local people outsider emphasizes local knowledge enables local people make appraisal analysis plan pra originally developed enable development practitioner government official local people work together plan context appropriate programme pra type exercise also used context planning ddr n 2 lca lusaka ceasefire accord 1999 sca sun city accord april 2002 dra drcrwanda accord july 2002 n 3 undp d3 report 2001 n 4 drc authority n 5 privileged source n 6 unverified information n 7 undpiom registration record n 8 undp d3 report 2001 n 9 government uganda source united nation organization mission democratic republic congo monuc n 10 fnl estimated 3000 men undp d3 report located mainly burundi", "ProcessedSent": "n 6 unverified information", "SentID": 2776 }, { "ParagraphID": 893, - "Paragraph": "1 PRA uses group animation and exercises to obtain information. Using PRA methods, local people carry out the data collection and analysis, with outsiders assisting with the process rather than control\u00ad ling it. This approach brings about shared learning between local people and outsiders; emphasizes local knowledge; and enables local people to make their own appraisal, analysis and plans. PRA was originally developed so as to enable development practitioners, government officials and local people to work together to plan context\u00adappropriate programmes. PRA\u00adtype exercises can also be used in other contexts such as in planning for DDR. \\n 2 LCA \u2013 Lusaka Ceasefire Accords, 1999; SCA \u2013 Sun City Accord, April 2002; DRA \u2013 DRC\/Rwanda Accords, July 2002. \\n 3 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \\n 4 DRC authorities. \\n 5 Privileged source. \\n 6 Unverified information. \\n 7 UNDP\/IOM registration records. \\n 8 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \\n 9 Government of Uganda sources, United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC). \\n 10 FNL estimated at 3,000 men (UNDP D3 report), located mainly in Burundi.", + "Paragraph": "1 PRA uses group animation and exercises to obtain information. Using PRA methods, local people carry out the data collection and analysis, with outsiders assisting with the process rather than control\u00ad ling it. This approach brings about shared learning between local people and outsiders; emphasizes local knowledge; and enables local people to make their own appraisal, analysis and plans. PRA was originally developed so as to enable development practitioners, government officials and local people to work together to plan context\u00adappropriate programmes. PRA\u00adtype exercises can also be used in other contexts such as in planning for DDR. \n 2 LCA \u2013 Lusaka Ceasefire Accords, 1999; SCA \u2013 Sun City Accord, April 2002; DRA \u2013 DRC\/Rwanda Accords, July 2002. \n 3 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \n 4 DRC authorities. \n 5 Privileged source. \n 6 Unverified information. \n 7 UNDP\/IOM registration records. \n 8 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \n 9 Government of Uganda sources, United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC). \n 10 FNL estimated at 3,000 men (UNDP D3 report), located mainly in Burundi.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -49998,14 +49998,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 7 UNDP\/IOM registration records.", + "Sentence": "\n 7 UNDP\/IOM registration records.", "newParagraph": "1 pra us group animation exercise obtain information using pra method local people carry data collection analysis outsider assisting process rather control ling approach brings shared learning local people outsider emphasizes local knowledge enables local people make appraisal analysis plan pra originally developed enable development practitioner government official local people work together plan context appropriate programme pra type exercise also used context planning ddr n 2 lca lusaka ceasefire accord 1999 sca sun city accord april 2002 dra drcrwanda accord july 2002 n 3 undp d3 report 2001 n 4 drc authority n 5 privileged source n 6 unverified information n 7 undpiom registration record n 8 undp d3 report 2001 n 9 government uganda source united nation organization mission democratic republic congo monuc n 10 fnl estimated 3000 men undp d3 report located mainly burundi", "ProcessedSent": "n 7 undpiom registration record", "SentID": 2777 }, { "ParagraphID": 893, - "Paragraph": "1 PRA uses group animation and exercises to obtain information. Using PRA methods, local people carry out the data collection and analysis, with outsiders assisting with the process rather than control\u00ad ling it. This approach brings about shared learning between local people and outsiders; emphasizes local knowledge; and enables local people to make their own appraisal, analysis and plans. PRA was originally developed so as to enable development practitioners, government officials and local people to work together to plan context\u00adappropriate programmes. PRA\u00adtype exercises can also be used in other contexts such as in planning for DDR. \\n 2 LCA \u2013 Lusaka Ceasefire Accords, 1999; SCA \u2013 Sun City Accord, April 2002; DRA \u2013 DRC\/Rwanda Accords, July 2002. \\n 3 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \\n 4 DRC authorities. \\n 5 Privileged source. \\n 6 Unverified information. \\n 7 UNDP\/IOM registration records. \\n 8 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \\n 9 Government of Uganda sources, United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC). \\n 10 FNL estimated at 3,000 men (UNDP D3 report), located mainly in Burundi.", + "Paragraph": "1 PRA uses group animation and exercises to obtain information. Using PRA methods, local people carry out the data collection and analysis, with outsiders assisting with the process rather than control\u00ad ling it. This approach brings about shared learning between local people and outsiders; emphasizes local knowledge; and enables local people to make their own appraisal, analysis and plans. PRA was originally developed so as to enable development practitioners, government officials and local people to work together to plan context\u00adappropriate programmes. PRA\u00adtype exercises can also be used in other contexts such as in planning for DDR. \n 2 LCA \u2013 Lusaka Ceasefire Accords, 1999; SCA \u2013 Sun City Accord, April 2002; DRA \u2013 DRC\/Rwanda Accords, July 2002. \n 3 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \n 4 DRC authorities. \n 5 Privileged source. \n 6 Unverified information. \n 7 UNDP\/IOM registration records. \n 8 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \n 9 Government of Uganda sources, United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC). \n 10 FNL estimated at 3,000 men (UNDP D3 report), located mainly in Burundi.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -50016,14 +50016,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 8 UNDP D3 report, 2001.", + "Sentence": "\n 8 UNDP D3 report, 2001.", "newParagraph": "1 pra us group animation exercise obtain information using pra method local people carry data collection analysis outsider assisting process rather control ling approach brings shared learning local people outsider emphasizes local knowledge enables local people make appraisal analysis plan pra originally developed enable development practitioner government official local people work together plan context appropriate programme pra type exercise also used context planning ddr n 2 lca lusaka ceasefire accord 1999 sca sun city accord april 2002 dra drcrwanda accord july 2002 n 3 undp d3 report 2001 n 4 drc authority n 5 privileged source n 6 unverified information n 7 undpiom registration record n 8 undp d3 report 2001 n 9 government uganda source united nation organization mission democratic republic congo monuc n 10 fnl estimated 3000 men undp d3 report located mainly burundi", "ProcessedSent": "n 8 undp d3 report 2001", "SentID": 2778 }, { "ParagraphID": 893, - "Paragraph": "1 PRA uses group animation and exercises to obtain information. Using PRA methods, local people carry out the data collection and analysis, with outsiders assisting with the process rather than control\u00ad ling it. This approach brings about shared learning between local people and outsiders; emphasizes local knowledge; and enables local people to make their own appraisal, analysis and plans. PRA was originally developed so as to enable development practitioners, government officials and local people to work together to plan context\u00adappropriate programmes. PRA\u00adtype exercises can also be used in other contexts such as in planning for DDR. \\n 2 LCA \u2013 Lusaka Ceasefire Accords, 1999; SCA \u2013 Sun City Accord, April 2002; DRA \u2013 DRC\/Rwanda Accords, July 2002. \\n 3 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \\n 4 DRC authorities. \\n 5 Privileged source. \\n 6 Unverified information. \\n 7 UNDP\/IOM registration records. \\n 8 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \\n 9 Government of Uganda sources, United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC). \\n 10 FNL estimated at 3,000 men (UNDP D3 report), located mainly in Burundi.", + "Paragraph": "1 PRA uses group animation and exercises to obtain information. Using PRA methods, local people carry out the data collection and analysis, with outsiders assisting with the process rather than control\u00ad ling it. This approach brings about shared learning between local people and outsiders; emphasizes local knowledge; and enables local people to make their own appraisal, analysis and plans. PRA was originally developed so as to enable development practitioners, government officials and local people to work together to plan context\u00adappropriate programmes. PRA\u00adtype exercises can also be used in other contexts such as in planning for DDR. \n 2 LCA \u2013 Lusaka Ceasefire Accords, 1999; SCA \u2013 Sun City Accord, April 2002; DRA \u2013 DRC\/Rwanda Accords, July 2002. \n 3 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \n 4 DRC authorities. \n 5 Privileged source. \n 6 Unverified information. \n 7 UNDP\/IOM registration records. \n 8 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \n 9 Government of Uganda sources, United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC). \n 10 FNL estimated at 3,000 men (UNDP D3 report), located mainly in Burundi.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -50034,14 +50034,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 9 Government of Uganda sources, United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC).", + "Sentence": "\n 9 Government of Uganda sources, United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC).", "newParagraph": "1 pra us group animation exercise obtain information using pra method local people carry data collection analysis outsider assisting process rather control ling approach brings shared learning local people outsider emphasizes local knowledge enables local people make appraisal analysis plan pra originally developed enable development practitioner government official local people work together plan context appropriate programme pra type exercise also used context planning ddr n 2 lca lusaka ceasefire accord 1999 sca sun city accord april 2002 dra drcrwanda accord july 2002 n 3 undp d3 report 2001 n 4 drc authority n 5 privileged source n 6 unverified information n 7 undpiom registration record n 8 undp d3 report 2001 n 9 government uganda source united nation organization mission democratic republic congo monuc n 10 fnl estimated 3000 men undp d3 report located mainly burundi", "ProcessedSent": "n 9 government uganda source united nation organization mission democratic republic congo monuc", "SentID": 2779 }, { "ParagraphID": 893, - "Paragraph": "1 PRA uses group animation and exercises to obtain information. Using PRA methods, local people carry out the data collection and analysis, with outsiders assisting with the process rather than control\u00ad ling it. This approach brings about shared learning between local people and outsiders; emphasizes local knowledge; and enables local people to make their own appraisal, analysis and plans. PRA was originally developed so as to enable development practitioners, government officials and local people to work together to plan context\u00adappropriate programmes. PRA\u00adtype exercises can also be used in other contexts such as in planning for DDR. \\n 2 LCA \u2013 Lusaka Ceasefire Accords, 1999; SCA \u2013 Sun City Accord, April 2002; DRA \u2013 DRC\/Rwanda Accords, July 2002. \\n 3 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \\n 4 DRC authorities. \\n 5 Privileged source. \\n 6 Unverified information. \\n 7 UNDP\/IOM registration records. \\n 8 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \\n 9 Government of Uganda sources, United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC). \\n 10 FNL estimated at 3,000 men (UNDP D3 report), located mainly in Burundi.", + "Paragraph": "1 PRA uses group animation and exercises to obtain information. Using PRA methods, local people carry out the data collection and analysis, with outsiders assisting with the process rather than control\u00ad ling it. This approach brings about shared learning between local people and outsiders; emphasizes local knowledge; and enables local people to make their own appraisal, analysis and plans. PRA was originally developed so as to enable development practitioners, government officials and local people to work together to plan context\u00adappropriate programmes. PRA\u00adtype exercises can also be used in other contexts such as in planning for DDR. \n 2 LCA \u2013 Lusaka Ceasefire Accords, 1999; SCA \u2013 Sun City Accord, April 2002; DRA \u2013 DRC\/Rwanda Accords, July 2002. \n 3 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \n 4 DRC authorities. \n 5 Privileged source. \n 6 Unverified information. \n 7 UNDP\/IOM registration records. \n 8 UNDP D3 report, 2001. \n 9 Government of Uganda sources, United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC). \n 10 FNL estimated at 3,000 men (UNDP D3 report), located mainly in Burundi.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -50052,14 +50052,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 10 FNL estimated at 3,000 men (UNDP D3 report), located mainly in Burundi.", + "Sentence": "\n 10 FNL estimated at 3,000 men (UNDP D3 report), located mainly in Burundi.", "newParagraph": "1 pra us group animation exercise obtain information using pra method local people carry data collection analysis outsider assisting process rather control ling approach brings shared learning local people outsider emphasizes local knowledge enables local people make appraisal analysis plan pra originally developed enable development practitioner government official local people work together plan context appropriate programme pra type exercise also used context planning ddr n 2 lca lusaka ceasefire accord 1999 sca sun city accord april 2002 dra drcrwanda accord july 2002 n 3 undp d3 report 2001 n 4 drc authority n 5 privileged source n 6 unverified information n 7 undpiom registration record n 8 undp d3 report 2001 n 9 government uganda source united nation organization mission democratic republic congo monuc n 10 fnl estimated 3000 men undp d3 report located mainly burundi", "ProcessedSent": "n 10 fnl estimated 3000 men undp d3 report located mainly burundi", "SentID": 2780 }, { "ParagraphID": 894, - "Paragraph": "Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) programmes have increasingly relied on national institutions to ensure their success and sustainability. This module discusses three main issues related to national institutions: \\n 1) mandates and legal frameworks; \\n 2) structures and functions; and \\n 3) coordination with international DDR structures and processes.", + "Paragraph": "Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) programmes have increasingly relied on national institutions to ensure their success and sustainability. This module discusses three main issues related to national institutions: \n 1) mandates and legal frameworks; \n 2) structures and functions; and \n 3) coordination with international DDR structures and processes.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -50077,7 +50077,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 894, - "Paragraph": "Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) programmes have increasingly relied on national institutions to ensure their success and sustainability. This module discusses three main issues related to national institutions: \\n 1) mandates and legal frameworks; \\n 2) structures and functions; and \\n 3) coordination with international DDR structures and processes.", + "Paragraph": "Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) programmes have increasingly relied on national institutions to ensure their success and sustainability. This module discusses three main issues related to national institutions: \n 1) mandates and legal frameworks; \n 2) structures and functions; and \n 3) coordination with international DDR structures and processes.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -50088,7 +50088,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This module discusses three main issues related to national institutions: \\n 1) mandates and legal frameworks; \\n 2) structures and functions; and \\n 3) coordination with international DDR structures and processes.", + "Sentence": "This module discusses three main issues related to national institutions: \n 1) mandates and legal frameworks; \n 2) structures and functions; and \n 3) coordination with international DDR structures and processes.", "newParagraph": "disarmament demobilization reintegration ddr programme increasingly relied national institution ensure success sustainability module discus three main issue related national institution n 1 mandate legal framework n 2 structure function n 3 coordination international ddr structure process", "ProcessedSent": "module discus three main issue related national institution n 1 mandate legal framework n 2 structure function n 3 coordination international ddr structure process", "SentID": 2782 @@ -50185,7 +50185,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 897, - "Paragraph": "In addition, national institutions should adequately function at three different levels: \\n the policy\/strategic level through the establishment of a national commission on DDR; \\n the planning and technical levels through the creation of a national technical planning and coordination body; and \\n the implementation\/operational level through a joint implementation unit and field\/ regional offices.", + "Paragraph": "In addition, national institutions should adequately function at three different levels: \n the policy\/strategic level through the establishment of a national commission on DDR; \n the planning and technical levels through the creation of a national technical planning and coordination body; and \n the implementation\/operational level through a joint implementation unit and field\/ regional offices.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -50196,7 +50196,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "In addition, national institutions should adequately function at three different levels: \\n the policy\/strategic level through the establishment of a national commission on DDR; \\n the planning and technical levels through the creation of a national technical planning and coordination body; and \\n the implementation\/operational level through a joint implementation unit and field\/ regional offices.", + "Sentence": "In addition, national institutions should adequately function at three different levels: \n the policy\/strategic level through the establishment of a national commission on DDR; \n the planning and technical levels through the creation of a national technical planning and coordination body; and \n the implementation\/operational level through a joint implementation unit and field\/ regional offices.", "newParagraph": "addition national institution adequately function three different level n policystrategic level establishment national commission ddr n planning technical level creation national technical planning coordination body n implementationoperational level joint implementation unit field regional office", "ProcessedSent": "addition national institution adequately function three different level n policystrategic level establishment national commission ddr n planning technical level creation national technical planning coordination body n implementationoperational level joint implementation unit field regional office", "SentID": 2788 @@ -50365,7 +50365,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 903, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -50383,7 +50383,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 903, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -50394,14 +50394,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard.", + "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard.", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "ProcessedSent": "use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard", "SentID": 2799 }, { "ParagraphID": 903, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -50412,14 +50412,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications.", + "Sentence": "\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications.", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "ProcessedSent": "n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification", "SentID": 2800 }, { "ParagraphID": 903, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -50430,7 +50430,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Sentence": "\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "ProcessedSent": "n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "SentID": 2801 @@ -50743,7 +50743,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 911, - "Paragraph": "Accountability and transparency are important principles for all national institutions. DDR institutions should adopt and encourage\/support these values in order to: \\n build confidence among the parties to the DDR process; \\n establish the legitimacy of the process with the general population and local commu- nities; \\n ensure continued financial and technical support from international actors.", + "Paragraph": "Accountability and transparency are important principles for all national institutions. DDR institutions should adopt and encourage\/support these values in order to: \n build confidence among the parties to the DDR process; \n establish the legitimacy of the process with the general population and local commu- nities; \n ensure continued financial and technical support from international actors.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -50761,7 +50761,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 911, - "Paragraph": "Accountability and transparency are important principles for all national institutions. DDR institutions should adopt and encourage\/support these values in order to: \\n build confidence among the parties to the DDR process; \\n establish the legitimacy of the process with the general population and local commu- nities; \\n ensure continued financial and technical support from international actors.", + "Paragraph": "Accountability and transparency are important principles for all national institutions. DDR institutions should adopt and encourage\/support these values in order to: \n build confidence among the parties to the DDR process; \n establish the legitimacy of the process with the general population and local commu- nities; \n ensure continued financial and technical support from international actors.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -50772,7 +50772,7 @@ "Heading2": "4.3. Accountability and transparency", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "DDR institutions should adopt and encourage\/support these values in order to: \\n build confidence among the parties to the DDR process; \\n establish the legitimacy of the process with the general population and local commu- nities; \\n ensure continued financial and technical support from international actors.", + "Sentence": "DDR institutions should adopt and encourage\/support these values in order to: \n build confidence among the parties to the DDR process; \n establish the legitimacy of the process with the general population and local commu- nities; \n ensure continued financial and technical support from international actors.", "newParagraph": "accountability transparency important principle national institution ddr institution adopt encouragesupport value order n build confidence among party ddr process n establish legitimacy process general population local commu nities n ensure continued financial technical support international actor", "ProcessedSent": "ddr institution adopt encouragesupport value order n build confidence among party ddr process n establish legitimacy process general population local commu nities n ensure continued financial technical support international actor", "SentID": 2820 @@ -50851,7 +50851,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 914, - "Paragraph": "The national and international mandates for DDR should be clear and coherent. A clear division of responsibilities should be established in the different levels of programme co- ordination and for different programme components. This can be done through: \\n supporting international experts to provide technical advice on DDR to parties to the peace negotiations; \\n incorporating national authorities into inter-agency assessment missions to ensure that national policies and strategies are reflected in the Secretary-General\u2019s report and Secu- rity Council mandates for UN peace-support operations; \\n discussing national and international roles, responsibilities and functions within the framework of an agreed common DDR plan or programme; \\n providing technical advice to national authorities on the design and development of legal frameworks, institutional mechanisms and national programmes for DDR; \\n establishing mechanisms for the joint implementation and coordination of DDR pro- grammes and activities at the policy, planning and operational levels.", + "Paragraph": "The national and international mandates for DDR should be clear and coherent. A clear division of responsibilities should be established in the different levels of programme co- ordination and for different programme components. This can be done through: \n supporting international experts to provide technical advice on DDR to parties to the peace negotiations; \n incorporating national authorities into inter-agency assessment missions to ensure that national policies and strategies are reflected in the Secretary-General\u2019s report and Secu- rity Council mandates for UN peace-support operations; \n discussing national and international roles, responsibilities and functions within the framework of an agreed common DDR plan or programme; \n providing technical advice to national authorities on the design and development of legal frameworks, institutional mechanisms and national programmes for DDR; \n establishing mechanisms for the joint implementation and coordination of DDR pro- grammes and activities at the policy, planning and operational levels.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -50869,7 +50869,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 914, - "Paragraph": "The national and international mandates for DDR should be clear and coherent. A clear division of responsibilities should be established in the different levels of programme co- ordination and for different programme components. This can be done through: \\n supporting international experts to provide technical advice on DDR to parties to the peace negotiations; \\n incorporating national authorities into inter-agency assessment missions to ensure that national policies and strategies are reflected in the Secretary-General\u2019s report and Secu- rity Council mandates for UN peace-support operations; \\n discussing national and international roles, responsibilities and functions within the framework of an agreed common DDR plan or programme; \\n providing technical advice to national authorities on the design and development of legal frameworks, institutional mechanisms and national programmes for DDR; \\n establishing mechanisms for the joint implementation and coordination of DDR pro- grammes and activities at the policy, planning and operational levels.", + "Paragraph": "The national and international mandates for DDR should be clear and coherent. A clear division of responsibilities should be established in the different levels of programme co- ordination and for different programme components. This can be done through: \n supporting international experts to provide technical advice on DDR to parties to the peace negotiations; \n incorporating national authorities into inter-agency assessment missions to ensure that national policies and strategies are reflected in the Secretary-General\u2019s report and Secu- rity Council mandates for UN peace-support operations; \n discussing national and international roles, responsibilities and functions within the framework of an agreed common DDR plan or programme; \n providing technical advice to national authorities on the design and development of legal frameworks, institutional mechanisms and national programmes for DDR; \n establishing mechanisms for the joint implementation and coordination of DDR pro- grammes and activities at the policy, planning and operational levels.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -50887,7 +50887,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 914, - "Paragraph": "The national and international mandates for DDR should be clear and coherent. A clear division of responsibilities should be established in the different levels of programme co- ordination and for different programme components. This can be done through: \\n supporting international experts to provide technical advice on DDR to parties to the peace negotiations; \\n incorporating national authorities into inter-agency assessment missions to ensure that national policies and strategies are reflected in the Secretary-General\u2019s report and Secu- rity Council mandates for UN peace-support operations; \\n discussing national and international roles, responsibilities and functions within the framework of an agreed common DDR plan or programme; \\n providing technical advice to national authorities on the design and development of legal frameworks, institutional mechanisms and national programmes for DDR; \\n establishing mechanisms for the joint implementation and coordination of DDR pro- grammes and activities at the policy, planning and operational levels.", + "Paragraph": "The national and international mandates for DDR should be clear and coherent. A clear division of responsibilities should be established in the different levels of programme co- ordination and for different programme components. This can be done through: \n supporting international experts to provide technical advice on DDR to parties to the peace negotiations; \n incorporating national authorities into inter-agency assessment missions to ensure that national policies and strategies are reflected in the Secretary-General\u2019s report and Secu- rity Council mandates for UN peace-support operations; \n discussing national and international roles, responsibilities and functions within the framework of an agreed common DDR plan or programme; \n providing technical advice to national authorities on the design and development of legal frameworks, institutional mechanisms and national programmes for DDR; \n establishing mechanisms for the joint implementation and coordination of DDR pro- grammes and activities at the policy, planning and operational levels.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -50898,7 +50898,7 @@ "Heading2": "5.1. Establishing clear and coherent national and international mandates", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This can be done through: \\n supporting international experts to provide technical advice on DDR to parties to the peace negotiations; \\n incorporating national authorities into inter-agency assessment missions to ensure that national policies and strategies are reflected in the Secretary-General\u2019s report and Secu- rity Council mandates for UN peace-support operations; \\n discussing national and international roles, responsibilities and functions within the framework of an agreed common DDR plan or programme; \\n providing technical advice to national authorities on the design and development of legal frameworks, institutional mechanisms and national programmes for DDR; \\n establishing mechanisms for the joint implementation and coordination of DDR pro- grammes and activities at the policy, planning and operational levels.", + "Sentence": "This can be done through: \n supporting international experts to provide technical advice on DDR to parties to the peace negotiations; \n incorporating national authorities into inter-agency assessment missions to ensure that national policies and strategies are reflected in the Secretary-General\u2019s report and Secu- rity Council mandates for UN peace-support operations; \n discussing national and international roles, responsibilities and functions within the framework of an agreed common DDR plan or programme; \n providing technical advice to national authorities on the design and development of legal frameworks, institutional mechanisms and national programmes for DDR; \n establishing mechanisms for the joint implementation and coordination of DDR pro- grammes and activities at the policy, planning and operational levels.", "newParagraph": "national international mandate ddr clear coherent clear division responsibility established different level programme co ordination different programme component done n supporting international expert provide technical advice ddr party peace negotiation n incorporating national authority interagency assessment mission ensure national policy strategy reflected secretarygeneral report secu rity council mandate un peacesupport operation n discussing national international role responsibility function within framework agreed common ddr plan programme n providing technical advice national authority design development legal framework institutional mechanism national programme ddr n establishing mechanism joint implementation coordination ddr pro gramme activity policy planning operational level", "ProcessedSent": "done n supporting international expert provide technical advice ddr party peace negotiation n incorporating national authority interagency assessment mission ensure national policy strategy reflected secretarygeneral report secu rity council mandate un peacesupport operation n discussing national international role responsibility function within framework agreed common ddr plan programme n providing technical advice national authority design development legal framework institutional mechanism national programme ddr n establishing mechanism joint implementation coordination ddr pro gramme activity policy planning operational level", "SentID": 2827 @@ -50959,7 +50959,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 916, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the provisions of the peace accord, national authorities should develop legal instruments (legislation, decree[s] or executive order[s]) that establish the appropriate legal framework for DDR. These should include, but are not limited to, the following: \\n a letter of demobilization policy, which establishes the intent of national authorities to carry out a process of demobilization and reduction of armed forces and groups, indi- cating the total numbers to be demobilized, how this process will be carried out and under whose authority, and links to other national processes, particularly the reform and restructuring of the security sector; \\n legislation, decree(s) or executive order(s) establishing the national institutional frame- work for planning, implementing, monitoring and evaluating the DDR process. This legislation should include articles or separate instruments relating to: \\n\\n a national political body representing different parties to the process, ministries responsible for the programme and civil society. This legal instrument should establish the body\u2019s mandate for political coordination, policy direction and general oversight of the DDR programme. It should also establish the specific composi- tion of the body, frequency of meetings, responsible authority (usually the prime minister or president) and reporting lines to technical coordination and implemen- tation mechanisms; \\n\\n a technical planning and coordination body responsible for the technical design and implementation of the DDR programme. This legal instrument should specify the body\u2019s different technical units\/directions and overall management structure, as well as functional links to implementation mechanisms; \\n\\n operational and implementation mechanisms at national, provincial and local levels. Legal provisions should specify the institutions, international and local partners responsible for delivering different components of the DDR programme. It should also define financial management and reporting structures within the national programme; \\n\\n an institution or unit responsible for the financial management and oversight of the DDR programme, funds received from national accounts, bilateral and multi- lateral donors, and contracts and procurement. This unit may be housed within a national institution or entrusted to an international partner. Often a joint national\u2013 international management and oversight system is established, particularly where donor funds are being received.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the provisions of the peace accord, national authorities should develop legal instruments (legislation, decree[s] or executive order[s]) that establish the appropriate legal framework for DDR. These should include, but are not limited to, the following: \n a letter of demobilization policy, which establishes the intent of national authorities to carry out a process of demobilization and reduction of armed forces and groups, indi- cating the total numbers to be demobilized, how this process will be carried out and under whose authority, and links to other national processes, particularly the reform and restructuring of the security sector; \n legislation, decree(s) or executive order(s) establishing the national institutional frame- work for planning, implementing, monitoring and evaluating the DDR process. This legislation should include articles or separate instruments relating to: \n\n a national political body representing different parties to the process, ministries responsible for the programme and civil society. This legal instrument should establish the body\u2019s mandate for political coordination, policy direction and general oversight of the DDR programme. It should also establish the specific composi- tion of the body, frequency of meetings, responsible authority (usually the prime minister or president) and reporting lines to technical coordination and implemen- tation mechanisms; \n\n a technical planning and coordination body responsible for the technical design and implementation of the DDR programme. This legal instrument should specify the body\u2019s different technical units\/directions and overall management structure, as well as functional links to implementation mechanisms; \n\n operational and implementation mechanisms at national, provincial and local levels. Legal provisions should specify the institutions, international and local partners responsible for delivering different components of the DDR programme. It should also define financial management and reporting structures within the national programme; \n\n an institution or unit responsible for the financial management and oversight of the DDR programme, funds received from national accounts, bilateral and multi- lateral donors, and contracts and procurement. This unit may be housed within a national institution or entrusted to an international partner. Often a joint national\u2013 international management and oversight system is established, particularly where donor funds are being received.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -50977,7 +50977,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 916, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the provisions of the peace accord, national authorities should develop legal instruments (legislation, decree[s] or executive order[s]) that establish the appropriate legal framework for DDR. These should include, but are not limited to, the following: \\n a letter of demobilization policy, which establishes the intent of national authorities to carry out a process of demobilization and reduction of armed forces and groups, indi- cating the total numbers to be demobilized, how this process will be carried out and under whose authority, and links to other national processes, particularly the reform and restructuring of the security sector; \\n legislation, decree(s) or executive order(s) establishing the national institutional frame- work for planning, implementing, monitoring and evaluating the DDR process. This legislation should include articles or separate instruments relating to: \\n\\n a national political body representing different parties to the process, ministries responsible for the programme and civil society. This legal instrument should establish the body\u2019s mandate for political coordination, policy direction and general oversight of the DDR programme. It should also establish the specific composi- tion of the body, frequency of meetings, responsible authority (usually the prime minister or president) and reporting lines to technical coordination and implemen- tation mechanisms; \\n\\n a technical planning and coordination body responsible for the technical design and implementation of the DDR programme. This legal instrument should specify the body\u2019s different technical units\/directions and overall management structure, as well as functional links to implementation mechanisms; \\n\\n operational and implementation mechanisms at national, provincial and local levels. Legal provisions should specify the institutions, international and local partners responsible for delivering different components of the DDR programme. It should also define financial management and reporting structures within the national programme; \\n\\n an institution or unit responsible for the financial management and oversight of the DDR programme, funds received from national accounts, bilateral and multi- lateral donors, and contracts and procurement. This unit may be housed within a national institution or entrusted to an international partner. Often a joint national\u2013 international management and oversight system is established, particularly where donor funds are being received.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the provisions of the peace accord, national authorities should develop legal instruments (legislation, decree[s] or executive order[s]) that establish the appropriate legal framework for DDR. These should include, but are not limited to, the following: \n a letter of demobilization policy, which establishes the intent of national authorities to carry out a process of demobilization and reduction of armed forces and groups, indi- cating the total numbers to be demobilized, how this process will be carried out and under whose authority, and links to other national processes, particularly the reform and restructuring of the security sector; \n legislation, decree(s) or executive order(s) establishing the national institutional frame- work for planning, implementing, monitoring and evaluating the DDR process. This legislation should include articles or separate instruments relating to: \n\n a national political body representing different parties to the process, ministries responsible for the programme and civil society. This legal instrument should establish the body\u2019s mandate for political coordination, policy direction and general oversight of the DDR programme. It should also establish the specific composi- tion of the body, frequency of meetings, responsible authority (usually the prime minister or president) and reporting lines to technical coordination and implemen- tation mechanisms; \n\n a technical planning and coordination body responsible for the technical design and implementation of the DDR programme. This legal instrument should specify the body\u2019s different technical units\/directions and overall management structure, as well as functional links to implementation mechanisms; \n\n operational and implementation mechanisms at national, provincial and local levels. Legal provisions should specify the institutions, international and local partners responsible for delivering different components of the DDR programme. It should also define financial management and reporting structures within the national programme; \n\n an institution or unit responsible for the financial management and oversight of the DDR programme, funds received from national accounts, bilateral and multi- lateral donors, and contracts and procurement. This unit may be housed within a national institution or entrusted to an international partner. Often a joint national\u2013 international management and oversight system is established, particularly where donor funds are being received.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -50988,14 +50988,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3. National legislative framework", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "These should include, but are not limited to, the following: \\n a letter of demobilization policy, which establishes the intent of national authorities to carry out a process of demobilization and reduction of armed forces and groups, indi- cating the total numbers to be demobilized, how this process will be carried out and under whose authority, and links to other national processes, particularly the reform and restructuring of the security sector; \\n legislation, decree(s) or executive order(s) establishing the national institutional frame- work for planning, implementing, monitoring and evaluating the DDR process.", + "Sentence": "These should include, but are not limited to, the following: \n a letter of demobilization policy, which establishes the intent of national authorities to carry out a process of demobilization and reduction of armed forces and groups, indi- cating the total numbers to be demobilized, how this process will be carried out and under whose authority, and links to other national processes, particularly the reform and restructuring of the security sector; \n legislation, decree(s) or executive order(s) establishing the national institutional frame- work for planning, implementing, monitoring and evaluating the DDR process.", "newParagraph": "addition provision peace accord national authority develop legal instrument legislation decree executive order establish appropriate legal framework ddr include limited following n letter demobilization policy establishes intent national authority carry process demobilization reduction armed force group indi cating total number demobilized process carried whose authority link national process particularly reform restructuring security sector n legislation decree executive order establishing national institutional frame work planning implementing monitoring evaluating ddr process legislation include article separate instrument relating nn national political body representing different party process ministry responsible programme civil society legal instrument establish body mandate political coordination policy direction general oversight ddr programme also establish specific composi tion body frequency meeting responsible authority usually prime minister president reporting line technical coordination implemen tation mechanism nn technical planning coordination body responsible technical design implementation ddr programme legal instrument specify body different technical unitsdirections overall management structure well functional link implementation mechanism nn operational implementation mechanism national provincial local level legal provision specify institution international local partner responsible delivering different component ddr programme also define financial management reporting structure within national programme nn institution unit responsible financial management oversight ddr programme fund received national account bilateral multi lateral donor contract procurement unit may housed within national institution entrusted international partner often joint national international management oversight system established particularly donor fund received", "ProcessedSent": "include limited following n letter demobilization policy establishes intent national authority carry process demobilization reduction armed force group indi cating total number demobilized process carried whose authority link national process particularly reform restructuring security sector n legislation decree executive order establishing national institutional frame work planning implementing monitoring evaluating ddr process", "SentID": 2832 }, { "ParagraphID": 916, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the provisions of the peace accord, national authorities should develop legal instruments (legislation, decree[s] or executive order[s]) that establish the appropriate legal framework for DDR. These should include, but are not limited to, the following: \\n a letter of demobilization policy, which establishes the intent of national authorities to carry out a process of demobilization and reduction of armed forces and groups, indi- cating the total numbers to be demobilized, how this process will be carried out and under whose authority, and links to other national processes, particularly the reform and restructuring of the security sector; \\n legislation, decree(s) or executive order(s) establishing the national institutional frame- work for planning, implementing, monitoring and evaluating the DDR process. This legislation should include articles or separate instruments relating to: \\n\\n a national political body representing different parties to the process, ministries responsible for the programme and civil society. This legal instrument should establish the body\u2019s mandate for political coordination, policy direction and general oversight of the DDR programme. It should also establish the specific composi- tion of the body, frequency of meetings, responsible authority (usually the prime minister or president) and reporting lines to technical coordination and implemen- tation mechanisms; \\n\\n a technical planning and coordination body responsible for the technical design and implementation of the DDR programme. This legal instrument should specify the body\u2019s different technical units\/directions and overall management structure, as well as functional links to implementation mechanisms; \\n\\n operational and implementation mechanisms at national, provincial and local levels. Legal provisions should specify the institutions, international and local partners responsible for delivering different components of the DDR programme. It should also define financial management and reporting structures within the national programme; \\n\\n an institution or unit responsible for the financial management and oversight of the DDR programme, funds received from national accounts, bilateral and multi- lateral donors, and contracts and procurement. This unit may be housed within a national institution or entrusted to an international partner. Often a joint national\u2013 international management and oversight system is established, particularly where donor funds are being received.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the provisions of the peace accord, national authorities should develop legal instruments (legislation, decree[s] or executive order[s]) that establish the appropriate legal framework for DDR. These should include, but are not limited to, the following: \n a letter of demobilization policy, which establishes the intent of national authorities to carry out a process of demobilization and reduction of armed forces and groups, indi- cating the total numbers to be demobilized, how this process will be carried out and under whose authority, and links to other national processes, particularly the reform and restructuring of the security sector; \n legislation, decree(s) or executive order(s) establishing the national institutional frame- work for planning, implementing, monitoring and evaluating the DDR process. This legislation should include articles or separate instruments relating to: \n\n a national political body representing different parties to the process, ministries responsible for the programme and civil society. This legal instrument should establish the body\u2019s mandate for political coordination, policy direction and general oversight of the DDR programme. It should also establish the specific composi- tion of the body, frequency of meetings, responsible authority (usually the prime minister or president) and reporting lines to technical coordination and implemen- tation mechanisms; \n\n a technical planning and coordination body responsible for the technical design and implementation of the DDR programme. This legal instrument should specify the body\u2019s different technical units\/directions and overall management structure, as well as functional links to implementation mechanisms; \n\n operational and implementation mechanisms at national, provincial and local levels. Legal provisions should specify the institutions, international and local partners responsible for delivering different components of the DDR programme. It should also define financial management and reporting structures within the national programme; \n\n an institution or unit responsible for the financial management and oversight of the DDR programme, funds received from national accounts, bilateral and multi- lateral donors, and contracts and procurement. This unit may be housed within a national institution or entrusted to an international partner. Often a joint national\u2013 international management and oversight system is established, particularly where donor funds are being received.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -51006,14 +51006,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3. National legislative framework", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This legislation should include articles or separate instruments relating to: \\n\\n a national political body representing different parties to the process, ministries responsible for the programme and civil society.", + "Sentence": "This legislation should include articles or separate instruments relating to: \n\n a national political body representing different parties to the process, ministries responsible for the programme and civil society.", "newParagraph": "addition provision peace accord national authority develop legal instrument legislation decree executive order establish appropriate legal framework ddr include limited following n letter demobilization policy establishes intent national authority carry process demobilization reduction armed force group indi cating total number demobilized process carried whose authority link national process particularly reform restructuring security sector n legislation decree executive order establishing national institutional frame work planning implementing monitoring evaluating ddr process legislation include article separate instrument relating nn national political body representing different party process ministry responsible programme civil society legal instrument establish body mandate political coordination policy direction general oversight ddr programme also establish specific composi tion body frequency meeting responsible authority usually prime minister president reporting line technical coordination implemen tation mechanism nn technical planning coordination body responsible technical design implementation ddr programme legal instrument specify body different technical unitsdirections overall management structure well functional link implementation mechanism nn operational implementation mechanism national provincial local level legal provision specify institution international local partner responsible delivering different component ddr programme also define financial management reporting structure within national programme nn institution unit responsible financial management oversight ddr programme fund received national account bilateral multi lateral donor contract procurement unit may housed within national institution entrusted international partner often joint national international management oversight system established particularly donor fund received", "ProcessedSent": "legislation include article separate instrument relating nn national political body representing different party process ministry responsible programme civil society", "SentID": 2833 }, { "ParagraphID": 916, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the provisions of the peace accord, national authorities should develop legal instruments (legislation, decree[s] or executive order[s]) that establish the appropriate legal framework for DDR. These should include, but are not limited to, the following: \\n a letter of demobilization policy, which establishes the intent of national authorities to carry out a process of demobilization and reduction of armed forces and groups, indi- cating the total numbers to be demobilized, how this process will be carried out and under whose authority, and links to other national processes, particularly the reform and restructuring of the security sector; \\n legislation, decree(s) or executive order(s) establishing the national institutional frame- work for planning, implementing, monitoring and evaluating the DDR process. This legislation should include articles or separate instruments relating to: \\n\\n a national political body representing different parties to the process, ministries responsible for the programme and civil society. This legal instrument should establish the body\u2019s mandate for political coordination, policy direction and general oversight of the DDR programme. It should also establish the specific composi- tion of the body, frequency of meetings, responsible authority (usually the prime minister or president) and reporting lines to technical coordination and implemen- tation mechanisms; \\n\\n a technical planning and coordination body responsible for the technical design and implementation of the DDR programme. This legal instrument should specify the body\u2019s different technical units\/directions and overall management structure, as well as functional links to implementation mechanisms; \\n\\n operational and implementation mechanisms at national, provincial and local levels. Legal provisions should specify the institutions, international and local partners responsible for delivering different components of the DDR programme. It should also define financial management and reporting structures within the national programme; \\n\\n an institution or unit responsible for the financial management and oversight of the DDR programme, funds received from national accounts, bilateral and multi- lateral donors, and contracts and procurement. This unit may be housed within a national institution or entrusted to an international partner. Often a joint national\u2013 international management and oversight system is established, particularly where donor funds are being received.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the provisions of the peace accord, national authorities should develop legal instruments (legislation, decree[s] or executive order[s]) that establish the appropriate legal framework for DDR. These should include, but are not limited to, the following: \n a letter of demobilization policy, which establishes the intent of national authorities to carry out a process of demobilization and reduction of armed forces and groups, indi- cating the total numbers to be demobilized, how this process will be carried out and under whose authority, and links to other national processes, particularly the reform and restructuring of the security sector; \n legislation, decree(s) or executive order(s) establishing the national institutional frame- work for planning, implementing, monitoring and evaluating the DDR process. This legislation should include articles or separate instruments relating to: \n\n a national political body representing different parties to the process, ministries responsible for the programme and civil society. This legal instrument should establish the body\u2019s mandate for political coordination, policy direction and general oversight of the DDR programme. It should also establish the specific composi- tion of the body, frequency of meetings, responsible authority (usually the prime minister or president) and reporting lines to technical coordination and implemen- tation mechanisms; \n\n a technical planning and coordination body responsible for the technical design and implementation of the DDR programme. This legal instrument should specify the body\u2019s different technical units\/directions and overall management structure, as well as functional links to implementation mechanisms; \n\n operational and implementation mechanisms at national, provincial and local levels. Legal provisions should specify the institutions, international and local partners responsible for delivering different components of the DDR programme. It should also define financial management and reporting structures within the national programme; \n\n an institution or unit responsible for the financial management and oversight of the DDR programme, funds received from national accounts, bilateral and multi- lateral donors, and contracts and procurement. This unit may be housed within a national institution or entrusted to an international partner. Often a joint national\u2013 international management and oversight system is established, particularly where donor funds are being received.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -51031,7 +51031,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 916, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the provisions of the peace accord, national authorities should develop legal instruments (legislation, decree[s] or executive order[s]) that establish the appropriate legal framework for DDR. These should include, but are not limited to, the following: \\n a letter of demobilization policy, which establishes the intent of national authorities to carry out a process of demobilization and reduction of armed forces and groups, indi- cating the total numbers to be demobilized, how this process will be carried out and under whose authority, and links to other national processes, particularly the reform and restructuring of the security sector; \\n legislation, decree(s) or executive order(s) establishing the national institutional frame- work for planning, implementing, monitoring and evaluating the DDR process. This legislation should include articles or separate instruments relating to: \\n\\n a national political body representing different parties to the process, ministries responsible for the programme and civil society. This legal instrument should establish the body\u2019s mandate for political coordination, policy direction and general oversight of the DDR programme. It should also establish the specific composi- tion of the body, frequency of meetings, responsible authority (usually the prime minister or president) and reporting lines to technical coordination and implemen- tation mechanisms; \\n\\n a technical planning and coordination body responsible for the technical design and implementation of the DDR programme. This legal instrument should specify the body\u2019s different technical units\/directions and overall management structure, as well as functional links to implementation mechanisms; \\n\\n operational and implementation mechanisms at national, provincial and local levels. Legal provisions should specify the institutions, international and local partners responsible for delivering different components of the DDR programme. It should also define financial management and reporting structures within the national programme; \\n\\n an institution or unit responsible for the financial management and oversight of the DDR programme, funds received from national accounts, bilateral and multi- lateral donors, and contracts and procurement. This unit may be housed within a national institution or entrusted to an international partner. Often a joint national\u2013 international management and oversight system is established, particularly where donor funds are being received.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the provisions of the peace accord, national authorities should develop legal instruments (legislation, decree[s] or executive order[s]) that establish the appropriate legal framework for DDR. These should include, but are not limited to, the following: \n a letter of demobilization policy, which establishes the intent of national authorities to carry out a process of demobilization and reduction of armed forces and groups, indi- cating the total numbers to be demobilized, how this process will be carried out and under whose authority, and links to other national processes, particularly the reform and restructuring of the security sector; \n legislation, decree(s) or executive order(s) establishing the national institutional frame- work for planning, implementing, monitoring and evaluating the DDR process. This legislation should include articles or separate instruments relating to: \n\n a national political body representing different parties to the process, ministries responsible for the programme and civil society. This legal instrument should establish the body\u2019s mandate for political coordination, policy direction and general oversight of the DDR programme. It should also establish the specific composi- tion of the body, frequency of meetings, responsible authority (usually the prime minister or president) and reporting lines to technical coordination and implemen- tation mechanisms; \n\n a technical planning and coordination body responsible for the technical design and implementation of the DDR programme. This legal instrument should specify the body\u2019s different technical units\/directions and overall management structure, as well as functional links to implementation mechanisms; \n\n operational and implementation mechanisms at national, provincial and local levels. Legal provisions should specify the institutions, international and local partners responsible for delivering different components of the DDR programme. It should also define financial management and reporting structures within the national programme; \n\n an institution or unit responsible for the financial management and oversight of the DDR programme, funds received from national accounts, bilateral and multi- lateral donors, and contracts and procurement. This unit may be housed within a national institution or entrusted to an international partner. Often a joint national\u2013 international management and oversight system is established, particularly where donor funds are being received.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -51042,14 +51042,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3. National legislative framework", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "It should also establish the specific composi- tion of the body, frequency of meetings, responsible authority (usually the prime minister or president) and reporting lines to technical coordination and implemen- tation mechanisms; \\n\\n a technical planning and coordination body responsible for the technical design and implementation of the DDR programme.", + "Sentence": "It should also establish the specific composi- tion of the body, frequency of meetings, responsible authority (usually the prime minister or president) and reporting lines to technical coordination and implemen- tation mechanisms; \n\n a technical planning and coordination body responsible for the technical design and implementation of the DDR programme.", "newParagraph": "addition provision peace accord national authority develop legal instrument legislation decree executive order establish appropriate legal framework ddr include limited following n letter demobilization policy establishes intent national authority carry process demobilization reduction armed force group indi cating total number demobilized process carried whose authority link national process particularly reform restructuring security sector n legislation decree executive order establishing national institutional frame work planning implementing monitoring evaluating ddr process legislation include article separate instrument relating nn national political body representing different party process ministry responsible programme civil society legal instrument establish body mandate political coordination policy direction general oversight ddr programme also establish specific composi tion body frequency meeting responsible authority usually prime minister president reporting line technical coordination implemen tation mechanism nn technical planning coordination body responsible technical design implementation ddr programme legal instrument specify body different technical unitsdirections overall management structure well functional link implementation mechanism nn operational implementation mechanism national provincial local level legal provision specify institution international local partner responsible delivering different component ddr programme also define financial management reporting structure within national programme nn institution unit responsible financial management oversight ddr programme fund received national account bilateral multi lateral donor contract procurement unit may housed within national institution entrusted international partner often joint national international management oversight system established particularly donor fund received", "ProcessedSent": "also establish specific composi tion body frequency meeting responsible authority usually prime minister president reporting line technical coordination implemen tation mechanism nn technical planning coordination body responsible technical design implementation ddr programme", "SentID": 2835 }, { "ParagraphID": 916, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the provisions of the peace accord, national authorities should develop legal instruments (legislation, decree[s] or executive order[s]) that establish the appropriate legal framework for DDR. These should include, but are not limited to, the following: \\n a letter of demobilization policy, which establishes the intent of national authorities to carry out a process of demobilization and reduction of armed forces and groups, indi- cating the total numbers to be demobilized, how this process will be carried out and under whose authority, and links to other national processes, particularly the reform and restructuring of the security sector; \\n legislation, decree(s) or executive order(s) establishing the national institutional frame- work for planning, implementing, monitoring and evaluating the DDR process. This legislation should include articles or separate instruments relating to: \\n\\n a national political body representing different parties to the process, ministries responsible for the programme and civil society. This legal instrument should establish the body\u2019s mandate for political coordination, policy direction and general oversight of the DDR programme. It should also establish the specific composi- tion of the body, frequency of meetings, responsible authority (usually the prime minister or president) and reporting lines to technical coordination and implemen- tation mechanisms; \\n\\n a technical planning and coordination body responsible for the technical design and implementation of the DDR programme. This legal instrument should specify the body\u2019s different technical units\/directions and overall management structure, as well as functional links to implementation mechanisms; \\n\\n operational and implementation mechanisms at national, provincial and local levels. Legal provisions should specify the institutions, international and local partners responsible for delivering different components of the DDR programme. It should also define financial management and reporting structures within the national programme; \\n\\n an institution or unit responsible for the financial management and oversight of the DDR programme, funds received from national accounts, bilateral and multi- lateral donors, and contracts and procurement. This unit may be housed within a national institution or entrusted to an international partner. Often a joint national\u2013 international management and oversight system is established, particularly where donor funds are being received.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the provisions of the peace accord, national authorities should develop legal instruments (legislation, decree[s] or executive order[s]) that establish the appropriate legal framework for DDR. These should include, but are not limited to, the following: \n a letter of demobilization policy, which establishes the intent of national authorities to carry out a process of demobilization and reduction of armed forces and groups, indi- cating the total numbers to be demobilized, how this process will be carried out and under whose authority, and links to other national processes, particularly the reform and restructuring of the security sector; \n legislation, decree(s) or executive order(s) establishing the national institutional frame- work for planning, implementing, monitoring and evaluating the DDR process. This legislation should include articles or separate instruments relating to: \n\n a national political body representing different parties to the process, ministries responsible for the programme and civil society. This legal instrument should establish the body\u2019s mandate for political coordination, policy direction and general oversight of the DDR programme. It should also establish the specific composi- tion of the body, frequency of meetings, responsible authority (usually the prime minister or president) and reporting lines to technical coordination and implemen- tation mechanisms; \n\n a technical planning and coordination body responsible for the technical design and implementation of the DDR programme. This legal instrument should specify the body\u2019s different technical units\/directions and overall management structure, as well as functional links to implementation mechanisms; \n\n operational and implementation mechanisms at national, provincial and local levels. Legal provisions should specify the institutions, international and local partners responsible for delivering different components of the DDR programme. It should also define financial management and reporting structures within the national programme; \n\n an institution or unit responsible for the financial management and oversight of the DDR programme, funds received from national accounts, bilateral and multi- lateral donors, and contracts and procurement. This unit may be housed within a national institution or entrusted to an international partner. Often a joint national\u2013 international management and oversight system is established, particularly where donor funds are being received.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -51060,14 +51060,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3. National legislative framework", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This legal instrument should specify the body\u2019s different technical units\/directions and overall management structure, as well as functional links to implementation mechanisms; \\n\\n operational and implementation mechanisms at national, provincial and local levels.", + "Sentence": "This legal instrument should specify the body\u2019s different technical units\/directions and overall management structure, as well as functional links to implementation mechanisms; \n\n operational and implementation mechanisms at national, provincial and local levels.", "newParagraph": "addition provision peace accord national authority develop legal instrument legislation decree executive order establish appropriate legal framework ddr include limited following n letter demobilization policy establishes intent national authority carry process demobilization reduction armed force group indi cating total number demobilized process carried whose authority link national process particularly reform restructuring security sector n legislation decree executive order establishing national institutional frame work planning implementing monitoring evaluating ddr process legislation include article separate instrument relating nn national political body representing different party process ministry responsible programme civil society legal instrument establish body mandate political coordination policy direction general oversight ddr programme also establish specific composi tion body frequency meeting responsible authority usually prime minister president reporting line technical coordination implemen tation mechanism nn technical planning coordination body responsible technical design implementation ddr programme legal instrument specify body different technical unitsdirections overall management structure well functional link implementation mechanism nn operational implementation mechanism national provincial local level legal provision specify institution international local partner responsible delivering different component ddr programme also define financial management reporting structure within national programme nn institution unit responsible financial management oversight ddr programme fund received national account bilateral multi lateral donor contract procurement unit may housed within national institution entrusted international partner often joint national international management oversight system established particularly donor fund received", "ProcessedSent": "legal instrument specify body different technical unitsdirections overall management structure well functional link implementation mechanism nn operational implementation mechanism national provincial local level", "SentID": 2836 }, { "ParagraphID": 916, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the provisions of the peace accord, national authorities should develop legal instruments (legislation, decree[s] or executive order[s]) that establish the appropriate legal framework for DDR. These should include, but are not limited to, the following: \\n a letter of demobilization policy, which establishes the intent of national authorities to carry out a process of demobilization and reduction of armed forces and groups, indi- cating the total numbers to be demobilized, how this process will be carried out and under whose authority, and links to other national processes, particularly the reform and restructuring of the security sector; \\n legislation, decree(s) or executive order(s) establishing the national institutional frame- work for planning, implementing, monitoring and evaluating the DDR process. This legislation should include articles or separate instruments relating to: \\n\\n a national political body representing different parties to the process, ministries responsible for the programme and civil society. This legal instrument should establish the body\u2019s mandate for political coordination, policy direction and general oversight of the DDR programme. It should also establish the specific composi- tion of the body, frequency of meetings, responsible authority (usually the prime minister or president) and reporting lines to technical coordination and implemen- tation mechanisms; \\n\\n a technical planning and coordination body responsible for the technical design and implementation of the DDR programme. This legal instrument should specify the body\u2019s different technical units\/directions and overall management structure, as well as functional links to implementation mechanisms; \\n\\n operational and implementation mechanisms at national, provincial and local levels. Legal provisions should specify the institutions, international and local partners responsible for delivering different components of the DDR programme. It should also define financial management and reporting structures within the national programme; \\n\\n an institution or unit responsible for the financial management and oversight of the DDR programme, funds received from national accounts, bilateral and multi- lateral donors, and contracts and procurement. This unit may be housed within a national institution or entrusted to an international partner. Often a joint national\u2013 international management and oversight system is established, particularly where donor funds are being received.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the provisions of the peace accord, national authorities should develop legal instruments (legislation, decree[s] or executive order[s]) that establish the appropriate legal framework for DDR. These should include, but are not limited to, the following: \n a letter of demobilization policy, which establishes the intent of national authorities to carry out a process of demobilization and reduction of armed forces and groups, indi- cating the total numbers to be demobilized, how this process will be carried out and under whose authority, and links to other national processes, particularly the reform and restructuring of the security sector; \n legislation, decree(s) or executive order(s) establishing the national institutional frame- work for planning, implementing, monitoring and evaluating the DDR process. This legislation should include articles or separate instruments relating to: \n\n a national political body representing different parties to the process, ministries responsible for the programme and civil society. This legal instrument should establish the body\u2019s mandate for political coordination, policy direction and general oversight of the DDR programme. It should also establish the specific composi- tion of the body, frequency of meetings, responsible authority (usually the prime minister or president) and reporting lines to technical coordination and implemen- tation mechanisms; \n\n a technical planning and coordination body responsible for the technical design and implementation of the DDR programme. This legal instrument should specify the body\u2019s different technical units\/directions and overall management structure, as well as functional links to implementation mechanisms; \n\n operational and implementation mechanisms at national, provincial and local levels. Legal provisions should specify the institutions, international and local partners responsible for delivering different components of the DDR programme. It should also define financial management and reporting structures within the national programme; \n\n an institution or unit responsible for the financial management and oversight of the DDR programme, funds received from national accounts, bilateral and multi- lateral donors, and contracts and procurement. This unit may be housed within a national institution or entrusted to an international partner. Often a joint national\u2013 international management and oversight system is established, particularly where donor funds are being received.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -51085,7 +51085,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 916, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the provisions of the peace accord, national authorities should develop legal instruments (legislation, decree[s] or executive order[s]) that establish the appropriate legal framework for DDR. These should include, but are not limited to, the following: \\n a letter of demobilization policy, which establishes the intent of national authorities to carry out a process of demobilization and reduction of armed forces and groups, indi- cating the total numbers to be demobilized, how this process will be carried out and under whose authority, and links to other national processes, particularly the reform and restructuring of the security sector; \\n legislation, decree(s) or executive order(s) establishing the national institutional frame- work for planning, implementing, monitoring and evaluating the DDR process. This legislation should include articles or separate instruments relating to: \\n\\n a national political body representing different parties to the process, ministries responsible for the programme and civil society. This legal instrument should establish the body\u2019s mandate for political coordination, policy direction and general oversight of the DDR programme. It should also establish the specific composi- tion of the body, frequency of meetings, responsible authority (usually the prime minister or president) and reporting lines to technical coordination and implemen- tation mechanisms; \\n\\n a technical planning and coordination body responsible for the technical design and implementation of the DDR programme. This legal instrument should specify the body\u2019s different technical units\/directions and overall management structure, as well as functional links to implementation mechanisms; \\n\\n operational and implementation mechanisms at national, provincial and local levels. Legal provisions should specify the institutions, international and local partners responsible for delivering different components of the DDR programme. It should also define financial management and reporting structures within the national programme; \\n\\n an institution or unit responsible for the financial management and oversight of the DDR programme, funds received from national accounts, bilateral and multi- lateral donors, and contracts and procurement. This unit may be housed within a national institution or entrusted to an international partner. Often a joint national\u2013 international management and oversight system is established, particularly where donor funds are being received.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the provisions of the peace accord, national authorities should develop legal instruments (legislation, decree[s] or executive order[s]) that establish the appropriate legal framework for DDR. These should include, but are not limited to, the following: \n a letter of demobilization policy, which establishes the intent of national authorities to carry out a process of demobilization and reduction of armed forces and groups, indi- cating the total numbers to be demobilized, how this process will be carried out and under whose authority, and links to other national processes, particularly the reform and restructuring of the security sector; \n legislation, decree(s) or executive order(s) establishing the national institutional frame- work for planning, implementing, monitoring and evaluating the DDR process. This legislation should include articles or separate instruments relating to: \n\n a national political body representing different parties to the process, ministries responsible for the programme and civil society. This legal instrument should establish the body\u2019s mandate for political coordination, policy direction and general oversight of the DDR programme. It should also establish the specific composi- tion of the body, frequency of meetings, responsible authority (usually the prime minister or president) and reporting lines to technical coordination and implemen- tation mechanisms; \n\n a technical planning and coordination body responsible for the technical design and implementation of the DDR programme. This legal instrument should specify the body\u2019s different technical units\/directions and overall management structure, as well as functional links to implementation mechanisms; \n\n operational and implementation mechanisms at national, provincial and local levels. Legal provisions should specify the institutions, international and local partners responsible for delivering different components of the DDR programme. It should also define financial management and reporting structures within the national programme; \n\n an institution or unit responsible for the financial management and oversight of the DDR programme, funds received from national accounts, bilateral and multi- lateral donors, and contracts and procurement. This unit may be housed within a national institution or entrusted to an international partner. Often a joint national\u2013 international management and oversight system is established, particularly where donor funds are being received.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -51096,14 +51096,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3. National legislative framework", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "It should also define financial management and reporting structures within the national programme; \\n\\n an institution or unit responsible for the financial management and oversight of the DDR programme, funds received from national accounts, bilateral and multi- lateral donors, and contracts and procurement.", + "Sentence": "It should also define financial management and reporting structures within the national programme; \n\n an institution or unit responsible for the financial management and oversight of the DDR programme, funds received from national accounts, bilateral and multi- lateral donors, and contracts and procurement.", "newParagraph": "addition provision peace accord national authority develop legal instrument legislation decree executive order establish appropriate legal framework ddr include limited following n letter demobilization policy establishes intent national authority carry process demobilization reduction armed force group indi cating total number demobilized process carried whose authority link national process particularly reform restructuring security sector n legislation decree executive order establishing national institutional frame work planning implementing monitoring evaluating ddr process legislation include article separate instrument relating nn national political body representing different party process ministry responsible programme civil society legal instrument establish body mandate political coordination policy direction general oversight ddr programme also establish specific composi tion body frequency meeting responsible authority usually prime minister president reporting line technical coordination implemen tation mechanism nn technical planning coordination body responsible technical design implementation ddr programme legal instrument specify body different technical unitsdirections overall management structure well functional link implementation mechanism nn operational implementation mechanism national provincial local level legal provision specify institution international local partner responsible delivering different component ddr programme also define financial management reporting structure within national programme nn institution unit responsible financial management oversight ddr programme fund received national account bilateral multi lateral donor contract procurement unit may housed within national institution entrusted international partner often joint national international management oversight system established particularly donor fund received", "ProcessedSent": "also define financial management reporting structure within national programme nn institution unit responsible financial management oversight ddr programme fund received national account bilateral multi lateral donor contract procurement", "SentID": 2838 }, { "ParagraphID": 916, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the provisions of the peace accord, national authorities should develop legal instruments (legislation, decree[s] or executive order[s]) that establish the appropriate legal framework for DDR. These should include, but are not limited to, the following: \\n a letter of demobilization policy, which establishes the intent of national authorities to carry out a process of demobilization and reduction of armed forces and groups, indi- cating the total numbers to be demobilized, how this process will be carried out and under whose authority, and links to other national processes, particularly the reform and restructuring of the security sector; \\n legislation, decree(s) or executive order(s) establishing the national institutional frame- work for planning, implementing, monitoring and evaluating the DDR process. This legislation should include articles or separate instruments relating to: \\n\\n a national political body representing different parties to the process, ministries responsible for the programme and civil society. This legal instrument should establish the body\u2019s mandate for political coordination, policy direction and general oversight of the DDR programme. It should also establish the specific composi- tion of the body, frequency of meetings, responsible authority (usually the prime minister or president) and reporting lines to technical coordination and implemen- tation mechanisms; \\n\\n a technical planning and coordination body responsible for the technical design and implementation of the DDR programme. This legal instrument should specify the body\u2019s different technical units\/directions and overall management structure, as well as functional links to implementation mechanisms; \\n\\n operational and implementation mechanisms at national, provincial and local levels. Legal provisions should specify the institutions, international and local partners responsible for delivering different components of the DDR programme. It should also define financial management and reporting structures within the national programme; \\n\\n an institution or unit responsible for the financial management and oversight of the DDR programme, funds received from national accounts, bilateral and multi- lateral donors, and contracts and procurement. This unit may be housed within a national institution or entrusted to an international partner. Often a joint national\u2013 international management and oversight system is established, particularly where donor funds are being received.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the provisions of the peace accord, national authorities should develop legal instruments (legislation, decree[s] or executive order[s]) that establish the appropriate legal framework for DDR. These should include, but are not limited to, the following: \n a letter of demobilization policy, which establishes the intent of national authorities to carry out a process of demobilization and reduction of armed forces and groups, indi- cating the total numbers to be demobilized, how this process will be carried out and under whose authority, and links to other national processes, particularly the reform and restructuring of the security sector; \n legislation, decree(s) or executive order(s) establishing the national institutional frame- work for planning, implementing, monitoring and evaluating the DDR process. This legislation should include articles or separate instruments relating to: \n\n a national political body representing different parties to the process, ministries responsible for the programme and civil society. This legal instrument should establish the body\u2019s mandate for political coordination, policy direction and general oversight of the DDR programme. It should also establish the specific composi- tion of the body, frequency of meetings, responsible authority (usually the prime minister or president) and reporting lines to technical coordination and implemen- tation mechanisms; \n\n a technical planning and coordination body responsible for the technical design and implementation of the DDR programme. This legal instrument should specify the body\u2019s different technical units\/directions and overall management structure, as well as functional links to implementation mechanisms; \n\n operational and implementation mechanisms at national, provincial and local levels. Legal provisions should specify the institutions, international and local partners responsible for delivering different components of the DDR programme. It should also define financial management and reporting structures within the national programme; \n\n an institution or unit responsible for the financial management and oversight of the DDR programme, funds received from national accounts, bilateral and multi- lateral donors, and contracts and procurement. This unit may be housed within a national institution or entrusted to an international partner. Often a joint national\u2013 international management and oversight system is established, particularly where donor funds are being received.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -51121,7 +51121,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 916, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the provisions of the peace accord, national authorities should develop legal instruments (legislation, decree[s] or executive order[s]) that establish the appropriate legal framework for DDR. These should include, but are not limited to, the following: \\n a letter of demobilization policy, which establishes the intent of national authorities to carry out a process of demobilization and reduction of armed forces and groups, indi- cating the total numbers to be demobilized, how this process will be carried out and under whose authority, and links to other national processes, particularly the reform and restructuring of the security sector; \\n legislation, decree(s) or executive order(s) establishing the national institutional frame- work for planning, implementing, monitoring and evaluating the DDR process. This legislation should include articles or separate instruments relating to: \\n\\n a national political body representing different parties to the process, ministries responsible for the programme and civil society. This legal instrument should establish the body\u2019s mandate for political coordination, policy direction and general oversight of the DDR programme. It should also establish the specific composi- tion of the body, frequency of meetings, responsible authority (usually the prime minister or president) and reporting lines to technical coordination and implemen- tation mechanisms; \\n\\n a technical planning and coordination body responsible for the technical design and implementation of the DDR programme. This legal instrument should specify the body\u2019s different technical units\/directions and overall management structure, as well as functional links to implementation mechanisms; \\n\\n operational and implementation mechanisms at national, provincial and local levels. Legal provisions should specify the institutions, international and local partners responsible for delivering different components of the DDR programme. It should also define financial management and reporting structures within the national programme; \\n\\n an institution or unit responsible for the financial management and oversight of the DDR programme, funds received from national accounts, bilateral and multi- lateral donors, and contracts and procurement. This unit may be housed within a national institution or entrusted to an international partner. Often a joint national\u2013 international management and oversight system is established, particularly where donor funds are being received.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the provisions of the peace accord, national authorities should develop legal instruments (legislation, decree[s] or executive order[s]) that establish the appropriate legal framework for DDR. These should include, but are not limited to, the following: \n a letter of demobilization policy, which establishes the intent of national authorities to carry out a process of demobilization and reduction of armed forces and groups, indi- cating the total numbers to be demobilized, how this process will be carried out and under whose authority, and links to other national processes, particularly the reform and restructuring of the security sector; \n legislation, decree(s) or executive order(s) establishing the national institutional frame- work for planning, implementing, monitoring and evaluating the DDR process. This legislation should include articles or separate instruments relating to: \n\n a national political body representing different parties to the process, ministries responsible for the programme and civil society. This legal instrument should establish the body\u2019s mandate for political coordination, policy direction and general oversight of the DDR programme. It should also establish the specific composi- tion of the body, frequency of meetings, responsible authority (usually the prime minister or president) and reporting lines to technical coordination and implemen- tation mechanisms; \n\n a technical planning and coordination body responsible for the technical design and implementation of the DDR programme. This legal instrument should specify the body\u2019s different technical units\/directions and overall management structure, as well as functional links to implementation mechanisms; \n\n operational and implementation mechanisms at national, provincial and local levels. Legal provisions should specify the institutions, international and local partners responsible for delivering different components of the DDR programme. It should also define financial management and reporting structures within the national programme; \n\n an institution or unit responsible for the financial management and oversight of the DDR programme, funds received from national accounts, bilateral and multi- lateral donors, and contracts and procurement. This unit may be housed within a national institution or entrusted to an international partner. Often a joint national\u2013 international management and oversight system is established, particularly where donor funds are being received.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -51715,7 +51715,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 928, - "Paragraph": "Integration is not only a principle for UN support to DDR, but also for the establishment of national institutions. The form of national institutions should reflect the security, economic and social dimensions of the DDR process. To achieve this, national institutions should include broad representation across a number of government ministries. Although the composition of national institutions for DDR will vary according to the particular govern- ment structures of different countries, the following institutions are generally represented at the level of policy and planning of national DDR institutions: \\n the executive (the presidency and\/or prime minister\u2019s office); \\n the ministries of defence and interior (national security); \\n the ministries of planning and finance; \\n the ministries of labour, employment and industry; \\n the ministries of agriculture and natural resources; \\n the ministries of social welfare, status of women and protection of children; \\n human rights and national reconciliation agencies; \\n electoral authorities.", + "Paragraph": "Integration is not only a principle for UN support to DDR, but also for the establishment of national institutions. The form of national institutions should reflect the security, economic and social dimensions of the DDR process. To achieve this, national institutions should include broad representation across a number of government ministries. Although the composition of national institutions for DDR will vary according to the particular govern- ment structures of different countries, the following institutions are generally represented at the level of policy and planning of national DDR institutions: \n the executive (the presidency and\/or prime minister\u2019s office); \n the ministries of defence and interior (national security); \n the ministries of planning and finance; \n the ministries of labour, employment and industry; \n the ministries of agriculture and natural resources; \n the ministries of social welfare, status of women and protection of children; \n human rights and national reconciliation agencies; \n electoral authorities.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -51733,7 +51733,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 928, - "Paragraph": "Integration is not only a principle for UN support to DDR, but also for the establishment of national institutions. The form of national institutions should reflect the security, economic and social dimensions of the DDR process. To achieve this, national institutions should include broad representation across a number of government ministries. Although the composition of national institutions for DDR will vary according to the particular govern- ment structures of different countries, the following institutions are generally represented at the level of policy and planning of national DDR institutions: \\n the executive (the presidency and\/or prime minister\u2019s office); \\n the ministries of defence and interior (national security); \\n the ministries of planning and finance; \\n the ministries of labour, employment and industry; \\n the ministries of agriculture and natural resources; \\n the ministries of social welfare, status of women and protection of children; \\n human rights and national reconciliation agencies; \\n electoral authorities.", + "Paragraph": "Integration is not only a principle for UN support to DDR, but also for the establishment of national institutions. The form of national institutions should reflect the security, economic and social dimensions of the DDR process. To achieve this, national institutions should include broad representation across a number of government ministries. Although the composition of national institutions for DDR will vary according to the particular govern- ment structures of different countries, the following institutions are generally represented at the level of policy and planning of national DDR institutions: \n the executive (the presidency and\/or prime minister\u2019s office); \n the ministries of defence and interior (national security); \n the ministries of planning and finance; \n the ministries of labour, employment and industry; \n the ministries of agriculture and natural resources; \n the ministries of social welfare, status of women and protection of children; \n human rights and national reconciliation agencies; \n electoral authorities.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -51751,7 +51751,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 928, - "Paragraph": "Integration is not only a principle for UN support to DDR, but also for the establishment of national institutions. The form of national institutions should reflect the security, economic and social dimensions of the DDR process. To achieve this, national institutions should include broad representation across a number of government ministries. Although the composition of national institutions for DDR will vary according to the particular govern- ment structures of different countries, the following institutions are generally represented at the level of policy and planning of national DDR institutions: \\n the executive (the presidency and\/or prime minister\u2019s office); \\n the ministries of defence and interior (national security); \\n the ministries of planning and finance; \\n the ministries of labour, employment and industry; \\n the ministries of agriculture and natural resources; \\n the ministries of social welfare, status of women and protection of children; \\n human rights and national reconciliation agencies; \\n electoral authorities.", + "Paragraph": "Integration is not only a principle for UN support to DDR, but also for the establishment of national institutions. The form of national institutions should reflect the security, economic and social dimensions of the DDR process. To achieve this, national institutions should include broad representation across a number of government ministries. Although the composition of national institutions for DDR will vary according to the particular govern- ment structures of different countries, the following institutions are generally represented at the level of policy and planning of national DDR institutions: \n the executive (the presidency and\/or prime minister\u2019s office); \n the ministries of defence and interior (national security); \n the ministries of planning and finance; \n the ministries of labour, employment and industry; \n the ministries of agriculture and natural resources; \n the ministries of social welfare, status of women and protection of children; \n human rights and national reconciliation agencies; \n electoral authorities.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -51769,7 +51769,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 928, - "Paragraph": "Integration is not only a principle for UN support to DDR, but also for the establishment of national institutions. The form of national institutions should reflect the security, economic and social dimensions of the DDR process. To achieve this, national institutions should include broad representation across a number of government ministries. Although the composition of national institutions for DDR will vary according to the particular govern- ment structures of different countries, the following institutions are generally represented at the level of policy and planning of national DDR institutions: \\n the executive (the presidency and\/or prime minister\u2019s office); \\n the ministries of defence and interior (national security); \\n the ministries of planning and finance; \\n the ministries of labour, employment and industry; \\n the ministries of agriculture and natural resources; \\n the ministries of social welfare, status of women and protection of children; \\n human rights and national reconciliation agencies; \\n electoral authorities.", + "Paragraph": "Integration is not only a principle for UN support to DDR, but also for the establishment of national institutions. The form of national institutions should reflect the security, economic and social dimensions of the DDR process. To achieve this, national institutions should include broad representation across a number of government ministries. Although the composition of national institutions for DDR will vary according to the particular govern- ment structures of different countries, the following institutions are generally represented at the level of policy and planning of national DDR institutions: \n the executive (the presidency and\/or prime minister\u2019s office); \n the ministries of defence and interior (national security); \n the ministries of planning and finance; \n the ministries of labour, employment and industry; \n the ministries of agriculture and natural resources; \n the ministries of social welfare, status of women and protection of children; \n human rights and national reconciliation agencies; \n electoral authorities.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -51780,7 +51780,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.1. Integrated approach", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Although the composition of national institutions for DDR will vary according to the particular govern- ment structures of different countries, the following institutions are generally represented at the level of policy and planning of national DDR institutions: \\n the executive (the presidency and\/or prime minister\u2019s office); \\n the ministries of defence and interior (national security); \\n the ministries of planning and finance; \\n the ministries of labour, employment and industry; \\n the ministries of agriculture and natural resources; \\n the ministries of social welfare, status of women and protection of children; \\n human rights and national reconciliation agencies; \\n electoral authorities.", + "Sentence": "Although the composition of national institutions for DDR will vary according to the particular govern- ment structures of different countries, the following institutions are generally represented at the level of policy and planning of national DDR institutions: \n the executive (the presidency and\/or prime minister\u2019s office); \n the ministries of defence and interior (national security); \n the ministries of planning and finance; \n the ministries of labour, employment and industry; \n the ministries of agriculture and natural resources; \n the ministries of social welfare, status of women and protection of children; \n human rights and national reconciliation agencies; \n electoral authorities.", "newParagraph": "integration principle un support ddr also establishment national institution form national institution reflect security economic social dimension ddr process achieve national institution include broad representation across number government ministry although composition national institution ddr vary according particular govern ment structure different country following institution generally represented level policy planning national ddr institution n executive presidency andor prime minister office n ministry defence interior national security n ministry planning finance n ministry labour employment industry n ministry agriculture natural resource n ministry social welfare status woman protection child n human right national reconciliation agency n electoral authority", "ProcessedSent": "although composition national institution ddr vary according particular govern ment structure different country following institution generally represented level policy planning national ddr institution n executive presidency andor prime minister office n ministry defence interior national security n ministry planning finance n ministry labour employment industry n ministry agriculture natural resource n ministry social welfare status woman protection child n human right national reconciliation agency n electoral authority", "SentID": 2876 @@ -51823,7 +51823,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 931, - "Paragraph": "A national DDR policy body representing key national and international stakeholders should be set up under a government or transitional authority established through peace accords, or under the authority of the president or prime minister. This body meets periodically to perform the following main functions: \\n to provide political coordination and policy direction for the national DDR programme; \\n to coordinate all government institutions and international agencies in support of the national DDR programme; \\n to ensure coordination of national DDR programme with other components of the national peace-building and recovery process; \\n to ensure oversight of the agency(ies) responsible for the design and implementation of the national DDR programme; \\n to review progress reports and financial statements; \\n to approve annual\/quarterly work plans.", + "Paragraph": "A national DDR policy body representing key national and international stakeholders should be set up under a government or transitional authority established through peace accords, or under the authority of the president or prime minister. This body meets periodically to perform the following main functions: \n to provide political coordination and policy direction for the national DDR programme; \n to coordinate all government institutions and international agencies in support of the national DDR programme; \n to ensure coordination of national DDR programme with other components of the national peace-building and recovery process; \n to ensure oversight of the agency(ies) responsible for the design and implementation of the national DDR programme; \n to review progress reports and financial statements; \n to approve annual\/quarterly work plans.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -51841,7 +51841,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 931, - "Paragraph": "A national DDR policy body representing key national and international stakeholders should be set up under a government or transitional authority established through peace accords, or under the authority of the president or prime minister. This body meets periodically to perform the following main functions: \\n to provide political coordination and policy direction for the national DDR programme; \\n to coordinate all government institutions and international agencies in support of the national DDR programme; \\n to ensure coordination of national DDR programme with other components of the national peace-building and recovery process; \\n to ensure oversight of the agency(ies) responsible for the design and implementation of the national DDR programme; \\n to review progress reports and financial statements; \\n to approve annual\/quarterly work plans.", + "Paragraph": "A national DDR policy body representing key national and international stakeholders should be set up under a government or transitional authority established through peace accords, or under the authority of the president or prime minister. This body meets periodically to perform the following main functions: \n to provide political coordination and policy direction for the national DDR programme; \n to coordinate all government institutions and international agencies in support of the national DDR programme; \n to ensure coordination of national DDR programme with other components of the national peace-building and recovery process; \n to ensure oversight of the agency(ies) responsible for the design and implementation of the national DDR programme; \n to review progress reports and financial statements; \n to approve annual\/quarterly work plans.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -51852,14 +51852,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.3. Policy\/Strategic level", "Heading3": "6.3.1. National DDR commission", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This body meets periodically to perform the following main functions: \\n to provide political coordination and policy direction for the national DDR programme; \\n to coordinate all government institutions and international agencies in support of the national DDR programme; \\n to ensure coordination of national DDR programme with other components of the national peace-building and recovery process; \\n to ensure oversight of the agency(ies) responsible for the design and implementation of the national DDR programme; \\n to review progress reports and financial statements; \\n to approve annual\/quarterly work plans.", + "Sentence": "This body meets periodically to perform the following main functions: \n to provide political coordination and policy direction for the national DDR programme; \n to coordinate all government institutions and international agencies in support of the national DDR programme; \n to ensure coordination of national DDR programme with other components of the national peace-building and recovery process; \n to ensure oversight of the agency(ies) responsible for the design and implementation of the national DDR programme; \n to review progress reports and financial statements; \n to approve annual\/quarterly work plans.", "newParagraph": "national ddr policy body representing key national international stakeholder set government transitional authority established peace accord authority president prime minister body meet periodically perform following main function n provide political coordination policy direction national ddr programme n coordinate government institution international agency support national ddr programme n ensure coordination national ddr programme component national peacebuilding recovery process n ensure oversight agencyies responsible design implementation national ddr programme n review progress report financial statement n approve annualquarterly work plan", "ProcessedSent": "body meet periodically perform following main function n provide political coordination policy direction national ddr programme n coordinate government institution international agency support national ddr programme n ensure coordination national ddr programme component national peacebuilding recovery process n ensure oversight agencyies responsible design implementation national ddr programme n review progress report financial statement n approve annualquarterly work plan", "SentID": 2880 }, { "ParagraphID": 932, - "Paragraph": "The precise composition of this policy body will vary; however, the following are gen- erally represented: \\n government ministries and agencies responsible for components of DDR (including national women\u2019s councils or agencies, and agencies responsible for youth and children); \\n representatives of parties to the peace accord\/political agreement; \\n representatives of the UN, regional organizations and donors; \\n representatives of civil society and the private sector.", + "Paragraph": "The precise composition of this policy body will vary; however, the following are gen- erally represented: \n government ministries and agencies responsible for components of DDR (including national women\u2019s councils or agencies, and agencies responsible for youth and children); \n representatives of parties to the peace accord\/political agreement; \n representatives of the UN, regional organizations and donors; \n representatives of civil society and the private sector.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -51870,7 +51870,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.3. Policy\/Strategic level", "Heading3": "6.3.1. National DDR commission", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The precise composition of this policy body will vary; however, the following are gen- erally represented: \\n government ministries and agencies responsible for components of DDR (including national women\u2019s councils or agencies, and agencies responsible for youth and children); \\n representatives of parties to the peace accord\/political agreement; \\n representatives of the UN, regional organizations and donors; \\n representatives of civil society and the private sector.", + "Sentence": "The precise composition of this policy body will vary; however, the following are gen- erally represented: \n government ministries and agencies responsible for components of DDR (including national women\u2019s councils or agencies, and agencies responsible for youth and children); \n representatives of parties to the peace accord\/political agreement; \n representatives of the UN, regional organizations and donors; \n representatives of civil society and the private sector.", "newParagraph": "precise composition policy body vary however following gen erally represented n government ministry agency responsible component ddr including national woman council agency agency responsible youth child n representative party peace accordpolitical agreement n representative un regional organization donor n representative civil society private sector", "ProcessedSent": "precise composition policy body vary however following gen erally represented n government ministry agency responsible component ddr including national woman council agency agency responsible youth child n representative party peace accordpolitical agreement n representative un regional organization donor n representative civil society private sector", "SentID": 2881 @@ -51931,7 +51931,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 934, - "Paragraph": "A national technical planning and coordination body, responsible for the design and im- plementation of the DDR programme, should be established. The national coordinator\/ director of this body oversees the day-to-day management of the DDR programme and ensures regular reporting to the NCDDR. The main functions of the national DDR agency include: \\n the design of the DDR programme, including conducting assessments, collecting base- line data, establishing indicators and targets, and defining eligibility criteria for the inclusion of individuals in DDR activities; \\n planning of DDR programme activities, including the establishment of information management systems, and monitoring and evaluations procedures; \\n oversight of the joint implementation unit (JIU) for DDR programme implementation.", + "Paragraph": "A national technical planning and coordination body, responsible for the design and im- plementation of the DDR programme, should be established. The national coordinator\/ director of this body oversees the day-to-day management of the DDR programme and ensures regular reporting to the NCDDR. The main functions of the national DDR agency include: \n the design of the DDR programme, including conducting assessments, collecting base- line data, establishing indicators and targets, and defining eligibility criteria for the inclusion of individuals in DDR activities; \n planning of DDR programme activities, including the establishment of information management systems, and monitoring and evaluations procedures; \n oversight of the joint implementation unit (JIU) for DDR programme implementation.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -51949,7 +51949,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 934, - "Paragraph": "A national technical planning and coordination body, responsible for the design and im- plementation of the DDR programme, should be established. The national coordinator\/ director of this body oversees the day-to-day management of the DDR programme and ensures regular reporting to the NCDDR. The main functions of the national DDR agency include: \\n the design of the DDR programme, including conducting assessments, collecting base- line data, establishing indicators and targets, and defining eligibility criteria for the inclusion of individuals in DDR activities; \\n planning of DDR programme activities, including the establishment of information management systems, and monitoring and evaluations procedures; \\n oversight of the joint implementation unit (JIU) for DDR programme implementation.", + "Paragraph": "A national technical planning and coordination body, responsible for the design and im- plementation of the DDR programme, should be established. The national coordinator\/ director of this body oversees the day-to-day management of the DDR programme and ensures regular reporting to the NCDDR. The main functions of the national DDR agency include: \n the design of the DDR programme, including conducting assessments, collecting base- line data, establishing indicators and targets, and defining eligibility criteria for the inclusion of individuals in DDR activities; \n planning of DDR programme activities, including the establishment of information management systems, and monitoring and evaluations procedures; \n oversight of the joint implementation unit (JIU) for DDR programme implementation.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -51967,7 +51967,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 934, - "Paragraph": "A national technical planning and coordination body, responsible for the design and im- plementation of the DDR programme, should be established. The national coordinator\/ director of this body oversees the day-to-day management of the DDR programme and ensures regular reporting to the NCDDR. The main functions of the national DDR agency include: \\n the design of the DDR programme, including conducting assessments, collecting base- line data, establishing indicators and targets, and defining eligibility criteria for the inclusion of individuals in DDR activities; \\n planning of DDR programme activities, including the establishment of information management systems, and monitoring and evaluations procedures; \\n oversight of the joint implementation unit (JIU) for DDR programme implementation.", + "Paragraph": "A national technical planning and coordination body, responsible for the design and im- plementation of the DDR programme, should be established. The national coordinator\/ director of this body oversees the day-to-day management of the DDR programme and ensures regular reporting to the NCDDR. The main functions of the national DDR agency include: \n the design of the DDR programme, including conducting assessments, collecting base- line data, establishing indicators and targets, and defining eligibility criteria for the inclusion of individuals in DDR activities; \n planning of DDR programme activities, including the establishment of information management systems, and monitoring and evaluations procedures; \n oversight of the joint implementation unit (JIU) for DDR programme implementation.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -51978,7 +51978,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.4. Planning and technical levels", "Heading3": "6.4.1. National DDR agency", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The main functions of the national DDR agency include: \\n the design of the DDR programme, including conducting assessments, collecting base- line data, establishing indicators and targets, and defining eligibility criteria for the inclusion of individuals in DDR activities; \\n planning of DDR programme activities, including the establishment of information management systems, and monitoring and evaluations procedures; \\n oversight of the joint implementation unit (JIU) for DDR programme implementation.", + "Sentence": "The main functions of the national DDR agency include: \n the design of the DDR programme, including conducting assessments, collecting base- line data, establishing indicators and targets, and defining eligibility criteria for the inclusion of individuals in DDR activities; \n planning of DDR programme activities, including the establishment of information management systems, and monitoring and evaluations procedures; \n oversight of the joint implementation unit (JIU) for DDR programme implementation.", "newParagraph": "national technical planning coordination body responsible design im plementation ddr programme established national coordinator director body oversees daytoday management ddr programme ensures regular reporting ncddr main function national ddr agency include n design ddr programme including conducting assessment collecting base line data establishing indicator target defining eligibility criterion inclusion individual ddr activity n planning ddr programme activity including establishment information management system monitoring evaluation procedure n oversight joint implementation unit jiu ddr programme implementation", "ProcessedSent": "main function national ddr agency include n design ddr programme including conducting assessment collecting base line data establishing indicator target defining eligibility criterion inclusion individual ddr activity n planning ddr programme activity including establishment information management system monitoring evaluation procedure n oversight joint implementation unit jiu ddr programme implementation", "SentID": 2887 @@ -52165,7 +52165,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 940, - "Paragraph": "The JIU is the operational arm of a national DDR agency, responsible for the implementation of a national DDR programme under the direction of the national coordinator, and ultimately accountable to the NCDDR. The organization of a JIU will vary depending on the priorities and implementation methods of particular national DDR programmes. It should be organ- ized by a functional unit that is designed to integrate the sectors and cross-cutting compo- nents of a national DDR programme, which may include: \\n disarmament and demobilization; reintegration; \\n child protection, youth, gender, cross-border, food, health and HIV\/AIDS advisers; \\n public information and community sensitization; \\n monitoring and evaluation.", + "Paragraph": "The JIU is the operational arm of a national DDR agency, responsible for the implementation of a national DDR programme under the direction of the national coordinator, and ultimately accountable to the NCDDR. The organization of a JIU will vary depending on the priorities and implementation methods of particular national DDR programmes. It should be organ- ized by a functional unit that is designed to integrate the sectors and cross-cutting compo- nents of a national DDR programme, which may include: \n disarmament and demobilization; reintegration; \n child protection, youth, gender, cross-border, food, health and HIV\/AIDS advisers; \n public information and community sensitization; \n monitoring and evaluation.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -52183,7 +52183,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 940, - "Paragraph": "The JIU is the operational arm of a national DDR agency, responsible for the implementation of a national DDR programme under the direction of the national coordinator, and ultimately accountable to the NCDDR. The organization of a JIU will vary depending on the priorities and implementation methods of particular national DDR programmes. It should be organ- ized by a functional unit that is designed to integrate the sectors and cross-cutting compo- nents of a national DDR programme, which may include: \\n disarmament and demobilization; reintegration; \\n child protection, youth, gender, cross-border, food, health and HIV\/AIDS advisers; \\n public information and community sensitization; \\n monitoring and evaluation.", + "Paragraph": "The JIU is the operational arm of a national DDR agency, responsible for the implementation of a national DDR programme under the direction of the national coordinator, and ultimately accountable to the NCDDR. The organization of a JIU will vary depending on the priorities and implementation methods of particular national DDR programmes. It should be organ- ized by a functional unit that is designed to integrate the sectors and cross-cutting compo- nents of a national DDR programme, which may include: \n disarmament and demobilization; reintegration; \n child protection, youth, gender, cross-border, food, health and HIV\/AIDS advisers; \n public information and community sensitization; \n monitoring and evaluation.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -52201,7 +52201,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 940, - "Paragraph": "The JIU is the operational arm of a national DDR agency, responsible for the implementation of a national DDR programme under the direction of the national coordinator, and ultimately accountable to the NCDDR. The organization of a JIU will vary depending on the priorities and implementation methods of particular national DDR programmes. It should be organ- ized by a functional unit that is designed to integrate the sectors and cross-cutting compo- nents of a national DDR programme, which may include: \\n disarmament and demobilization; reintegration; \\n child protection, youth, gender, cross-border, food, health and HIV\/AIDS advisers; \\n public information and community sensitization; \\n monitoring and evaluation.", + "Paragraph": "The JIU is the operational arm of a national DDR agency, responsible for the implementation of a national DDR programme under the direction of the national coordinator, and ultimately accountable to the NCDDR. The organization of a JIU will vary depending on the priorities and implementation methods of particular national DDR programmes. It should be organ- ized by a functional unit that is designed to integrate the sectors and cross-cutting compo- nents of a national DDR programme, which may include: \n disarmament and demobilization; reintegration; \n child protection, youth, gender, cross-border, food, health and HIV\/AIDS advisers; \n public information and community sensitization; \n monitoring and evaluation.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -52212,7 +52212,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.5. Implementation\/Operational level", "Heading3": "6.5.1. Joint implementation unit", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "It should be organ- ized by a functional unit that is designed to integrate the sectors and cross-cutting compo- nents of a national DDR programme, which may include: \\n disarmament and demobilization; reintegration; \\n child protection, youth, gender, cross-border, food, health and HIV\/AIDS advisers; \\n public information and community sensitization; \\n monitoring and evaluation.", + "Sentence": "It should be organ- ized by a functional unit that is designed to integrate the sectors and cross-cutting compo- nents of a national DDR programme, which may include: \n disarmament and demobilization; reintegration; \n child protection, youth, gender, cross-border, food, health and HIV\/AIDS advisers; \n public information and community sensitization; \n monitoring and evaluation.", "newParagraph": "jiu operational arm national ddr agency responsible implementation national ddr programme direction national coordinator ultimately accountable ncddr organization jiu vary depending priority implementation method particular national ddr programme organ ized functional unit designed integrate sector crosscutting compo nents national ddr programme may include n disarmament demobilization reintegration n child protection youth gender crossborder food health hivaids adviser n public information community sensitization n monitoring evaluation", "ProcessedSent": "organ ized functional unit designed integrate sector crosscutting compo nents national ddr programme may include n disarmament demobilization reintegration n child protection youth gender crossborder food health hivaids adviser n public information community sensitization n monitoring evaluation", "SentID": 2900 @@ -52237,7 +52237,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 942, - "Paragraph": "Given the size and sensitivities of resource allocation to large DDR operations, an independ- ent financial management, contracts and procurement unit for the national DDR programme should be established. This unit may be housed within the national DDR institution or entrusted to an international partner. A joint national\u2013international management and over- sight system may be established, particularly when donors are contributing significant funds for DDR. This unit should be responsible for the following: \\n establishing standards and procedures for financial management and accounting, con- tracts, and procurement of goods and services for the DDR programme; \\n mobilizing and managing national and international funds received for DDR programme activities; \\n reviewing and approving budgets for DDR programme activities; \\n establishing a reporting system and preparing financial reports and audits as required (also see IDDRS 3.41 on Finance and Budgeting).", + "Paragraph": "Given the size and sensitivities of resource allocation to large DDR operations, an independ- ent financial management, contracts and procurement unit for the national DDR programme should be established. This unit may be housed within the national DDR institution or entrusted to an international partner. A joint national\u2013international management and over- sight system may be established, particularly when donors are contributing significant funds for DDR. This unit should be responsible for the following: \n establishing standards and procedures for financial management and accounting, con- tracts, and procurement of goods and services for the DDR programme; \n mobilizing and managing national and international funds received for DDR programme activities; \n reviewing and approving budgets for DDR programme activities; \n establishing a reporting system and preparing financial reports and audits as required (also see IDDRS 3.41 on Finance and Budgeting).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -52255,7 +52255,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 942, - "Paragraph": "Given the size and sensitivities of resource allocation to large DDR operations, an independ- ent financial management, contracts and procurement unit for the national DDR programme should be established. This unit may be housed within the national DDR institution or entrusted to an international partner. A joint national\u2013international management and over- sight system may be established, particularly when donors are contributing significant funds for DDR. This unit should be responsible for the following: \\n establishing standards and procedures for financial management and accounting, con- tracts, and procurement of goods and services for the DDR programme; \\n mobilizing and managing national and international funds received for DDR programme activities; \\n reviewing and approving budgets for DDR programme activities; \\n establishing a reporting system and preparing financial reports and audits as required (also see IDDRS 3.41 on Finance and Budgeting).", + "Paragraph": "Given the size and sensitivities of resource allocation to large DDR operations, an independ- ent financial management, contracts and procurement unit for the national DDR programme should be established. This unit may be housed within the national DDR institution or entrusted to an international partner. A joint national\u2013international management and over- sight system may be established, particularly when donors are contributing significant funds for DDR. This unit should be responsible for the following: \n establishing standards and procedures for financial management and accounting, con- tracts, and procurement of goods and services for the DDR programme; \n mobilizing and managing national and international funds received for DDR programme activities; \n reviewing and approving budgets for DDR programme activities; \n establishing a reporting system and preparing financial reports and audits as required (also see IDDRS 3.41 on Finance and Budgeting).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -52273,7 +52273,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 942, - "Paragraph": "Given the size and sensitivities of resource allocation to large DDR operations, an independ- ent financial management, contracts and procurement unit for the national DDR programme should be established. This unit may be housed within the national DDR institution or entrusted to an international partner. A joint national\u2013international management and over- sight system may be established, particularly when donors are contributing significant funds for DDR. This unit should be responsible for the following: \\n establishing standards and procedures for financial management and accounting, con- tracts, and procurement of goods and services for the DDR programme; \\n mobilizing and managing national and international funds received for DDR programme activities; \\n reviewing and approving budgets for DDR programme activities; \\n establishing a reporting system and preparing financial reports and audits as required (also see IDDRS 3.41 on Finance and Budgeting).", + "Paragraph": "Given the size and sensitivities of resource allocation to large DDR operations, an independ- ent financial management, contracts and procurement unit for the national DDR programme should be established. This unit may be housed within the national DDR institution or entrusted to an international partner. A joint national\u2013international management and over- sight system may be established, particularly when donors are contributing significant funds for DDR. This unit should be responsible for the following: \n establishing standards and procedures for financial management and accounting, con- tracts, and procurement of goods and services for the DDR programme; \n mobilizing and managing national and international funds received for DDR programme activities; \n reviewing and approving budgets for DDR programme activities; \n establishing a reporting system and preparing financial reports and audits as required (also see IDDRS 3.41 on Finance and Budgeting).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -52291,7 +52291,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 942, - "Paragraph": "Given the size and sensitivities of resource allocation to large DDR operations, an independ- ent financial management, contracts and procurement unit for the national DDR programme should be established. This unit may be housed within the national DDR institution or entrusted to an international partner. A joint national\u2013international management and over- sight system may be established, particularly when donors are contributing significant funds for DDR. This unit should be responsible for the following: \\n establishing standards and procedures for financial management and accounting, con- tracts, and procurement of goods and services for the DDR programme; \\n mobilizing and managing national and international funds received for DDR programme activities; \\n reviewing and approving budgets for DDR programme activities; \\n establishing a reporting system and preparing financial reports and audits as required (also see IDDRS 3.41 on Finance and Budgeting).", + "Paragraph": "Given the size and sensitivities of resource allocation to large DDR operations, an independ- ent financial management, contracts and procurement unit for the national DDR programme should be established. This unit may be housed within the national DDR institution or entrusted to an international partner. A joint national\u2013international management and over- sight system may be established, particularly when donors are contributing significant funds for DDR. This unit should be responsible for the following: \n establishing standards and procedures for financial management and accounting, con- tracts, and procurement of goods and services for the DDR programme; \n mobilizing and managing national and international funds received for DDR programme activities; \n reviewing and approving budgets for DDR programme activities; \n establishing a reporting system and preparing financial reports and audits as required (also see IDDRS 3.41 on Finance and Budgeting).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -52302,7 +52302,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.5. Implementation\/Operational level", "Heading3": "6.5.2. Independent financial management unit", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This unit should be responsible for the following: \\n establishing standards and procedures for financial management and accounting, con- tracts, and procurement of goods and services for the DDR programme; \\n mobilizing and managing national and international funds received for DDR programme activities; \\n reviewing and approving budgets for DDR programme activities; \\n establishing a reporting system and preparing financial reports and audits as required (also see IDDRS 3.41 on Finance and Budgeting).", + "Sentence": "This unit should be responsible for the following: \n establishing standards and procedures for financial management and accounting, con- tracts, and procurement of goods and services for the DDR programme; \n mobilizing and managing national and international funds received for DDR programme activities; \n reviewing and approving budgets for DDR programme activities; \n establishing a reporting system and preparing financial reports and audits as required (also see IDDRS 3.41 on Finance and Budgeting).", "newParagraph": "given size sensitivity resource allocation large ddr operation independ ent financial management contract procurement unit national ddr programme established unit may housed within national ddr institution entrusted international partner joint national international management sight system may established particularly donor contributing significant fund ddr unit responsible following n establishing standard procedure financial management accounting con tract procurement good service ddr programme n mobilizing managing national international fund received ddr programme activity n reviewing approving budget ddr programme activity n establishing reporting system preparing financial report audit required also see iddrs 341 finance budgeting", "ProcessedSent": "unit responsible following n establishing standard procedure financial management accounting con tract procurement good service ddr programme n mobilizing managing national international fund received ddr programme activity n reviewing approving budget ddr programme activity n establishing reporting system preparing financial report audit required also see iddrs 341 finance budgeting", "SentID": 2905 @@ -52453,7 +52453,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 946, - "Paragraph": "Coordination of national and international efforts at the policy\/strategic level will vary a great deal, depending on the dynamics of the conflict, the parties to the peace process and the role\/mandate of the UN in support of peace-building and recovery, including DDR. However, coordination (and where possible, integration) of national and international efforts will be essential at the following points: \\n ensuring national and local stakeholder participation in UN assessment and mission planning exercises (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures). National stakeholders should be consulted and, where possible, participate fully in the initial planning phases of international support for DDR; \\n providing international support for the establishment of an NCDDR or political over- sight mechanisms; \\n coordinating bilateral and multilateral actors to ensure a coherent message on DDR and to support national institutions.", + "Paragraph": "Coordination of national and international efforts at the policy\/strategic level will vary a great deal, depending on the dynamics of the conflict, the parties to the peace process and the role\/mandate of the UN in support of peace-building and recovery, including DDR. However, coordination (and where possible, integration) of national and international efforts will be essential at the following points: \n ensuring national and local stakeholder participation in UN assessment and mission planning exercises (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures). National stakeholders should be consulted and, where possible, participate fully in the initial planning phases of international support for DDR; \n providing international support for the establishment of an NCDDR or political over- sight mechanisms; \n coordinating bilateral and multilateral actors to ensure a coherent message on DDR and to support national institutions.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -52471,7 +52471,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 946, - "Paragraph": "Coordination of national and international efforts at the policy\/strategic level will vary a great deal, depending on the dynamics of the conflict, the parties to the peace process and the role\/mandate of the UN in support of peace-building and recovery, including DDR. However, coordination (and where possible, integration) of national and international efforts will be essential at the following points: \\n ensuring national and local stakeholder participation in UN assessment and mission planning exercises (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures). National stakeholders should be consulted and, where possible, participate fully in the initial planning phases of international support for DDR; \\n providing international support for the establishment of an NCDDR or political over- sight mechanisms; \\n coordinating bilateral and multilateral actors to ensure a coherent message on DDR and to support national institutions.", + "Paragraph": "Coordination of national and international efforts at the policy\/strategic level will vary a great deal, depending on the dynamics of the conflict, the parties to the peace process and the role\/mandate of the UN in support of peace-building and recovery, including DDR. However, coordination (and where possible, integration) of national and international efforts will be essential at the following points: \n ensuring national and local stakeholder participation in UN assessment and mission planning exercises (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures). National stakeholders should be consulted and, where possible, participate fully in the initial planning phases of international support for DDR; \n providing international support for the establishment of an NCDDR or political over- sight mechanisms; \n coordinating bilateral and multilateral actors to ensure a coherent message on DDR and to support national institutions.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -52482,14 +52482,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1. Policy\/Strategic level", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "However, coordination (and where possible, integration) of national and international efforts will be essential at the following points: \\n ensuring national and local stakeholder participation in UN assessment and mission planning exercises (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures).", + "Sentence": "However, coordination (and where possible, integration) of national and international efforts will be essential at the following points: \n ensuring national and local stakeholder participation in UN assessment and mission planning exercises (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures).", "newParagraph": "coordination national international effort policystrategic level vary great deal depending dynamic conflict party peace process rolemandate un support peacebuilding recovery including ddr however coordination possible integration national international effort essential following point n ensuring national local stakeholder participation un assessment mission planning exercise also see iddrs 310 integrated ddr planning process structure national stakeholder consulted possible participate fully initial planning phase international support ddr n providing international support establishment ncddr political sight mechanism n coordinating bilateral multilateral actor ensure coherent message ddr support national institution", "ProcessedSent": "however coordination possible integration national international effort essential following point n ensuring national local stakeholder participation un assessment mission planning exercise also see iddrs 310 integrated ddr planning process structure", "SentID": 2915 }, { "ParagraphID": 946, - "Paragraph": "Coordination of national and international efforts at the policy\/strategic level will vary a great deal, depending on the dynamics of the conflict, the parties to the peace process and the role\/mandate of the UN in support of peace-building and recovery, including DDR. However, coordination (and where possible, integration) of national and international efforts will be essential at the following points: \\n ensuring national and local stakeholder participation in UN assessment and mission planning exercises (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures). National stakeholders should be consulted and, where possible, participate fully in the initial planning phases of international support for DDR; \\n providing international support for the establishment of an NCDDR or political over- sight mechanisms; \\n coordinating bilateral and multilateral actors to ensure a coherent message on DDR and to support national institutions.", + "Paragraph": "Coordination of national and international efforts at the policy\/strategic level will vary a great deal, depending on the dynamics of the conflict, the parties to the peace process and the role\/mandate of the UN in support of peace-building and recovery, including DDR. However, coordination (and where possible, integration) of national and international efforts will be essential at the following points: \n ensuring national and local stakeholder participation in UN assessment and mission planning exercises (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures). National stakeholders should be consulted and, where possible, participate fully in the initial planning phases of international support for DDR; \n providing international support for the establishment of an NCDDR or political over- sight mechanisms; \n coordinating bilateral and multilateral actors to ensure a coherent message on DDR and to support national institutions.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -52500,14 +52500,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1. Policy\/Strategic level", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "National stakeholders should be consulted and, where possible, participate fully in the initial planning phases of international support for DDR; \\n providing international support for the establishment of an NCDDR or political over- sight mechanisms; \\n coordinating bilateral and multilateral actors to ensure a coherent message on DDR and to support national institutions.", + "Sentence": "National stakeholders should be consulted and, where possible, participate fully in the initial planning phases of international support for DDR; \n providing international support for the establishment of an NCDDR or political over- sight mechanisms; \n coordinating bilateral and multilateral actors to ensure a coherent message on DDR and to support national institutions.", "newParagraph": "coordination national international effort policystrategic level vary great deal depending dynamic conflict party peace process rolemandate un support peacebuilding recovery including ddr however coordination possible integration national international effort essential following point n ensuring national local stakeholder participation un assessment mission planning exercise also see iddrs 310 integrated ddr planning process structure national stakeholder consulted possible participate fully initial planning phase international support ddr n providing international support establishment ncddr political sight mechanism n coordinating bilateral multilateral actor ensure coherent message ddr support national institution", "ProcessedSent": "national stakeholder consulted possible participate fully initial planning phase international support ddr n providing international support establishment ncddr political sight mechanism n coordinating bilateral multilateral actor ensure coherent message ddr support national institution", "SentID": 2916 }, { "ParagraphID": 947, - "Paragraph": "Coordination of national and international efforts at the planning and technical levels is important to ensure that the national DDR programme and UN support for DDR operations work together in an integrated and coherent way. It is important to ensure coordination at the following points: \\n in national DDR programme development; \\n in the development of DDR programmes of UN mission and agencies; \\n in technical coordination with bilateral partners and NGOs.", + "Paragraph": "Coordination of national and international efforts at the planning and technical levels is important to ensure that the national DDR programme and UN support for DDR operations work together in an integrated and coherent way. It is important to ensure coordination at the following points: \n in national DDR programme development; \n in the development of DDR programmes of UN mission and agencies; \n in technical coordination with bilateral partners and NGOs.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -52525,7 +52525,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 947, - "Paragraph": "Coordination of national and international efforts at the planning and technical levels is important to ensure that the national DDR programme and UN support for DDR operations work together in an integrated and coherent way. It is important to ensure coordination at the following points: \\n in national DDR programme development; \\n in the development of DDR programmes of UN mission and agencies; \\n in technical coordination with bilateral partners and NGOs.", + "Paragraph": "Coordination of national and international efforts at the planning and technical levels is important to ensure that the national DDR programme and UN support for DDR operations work together in an integrated and coherent way. It is important to ensure coordination at the following points: \n in national DDR programme development; \n in the development of DDR programmes of UN mission and agencies; \n in technical coordination with bilateral partners and NGOs.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -52536,14 +52536,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2. Planning and technical levels", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "It is important to ensure coordination at the following points: \\n in national DDR programme development; \\n in the development of DDR programmes of UN mission and agencies; \\n in technical coordination with bilateral partners and NGOs.", + "Sentence": "It is important to ensure coordination at the following points: \n in national DDR programme development; \n in the development of DDR programmes of UN mission and agencies; \n in technical coordination with bilateral partners and NGOs.", "newParagraph": "coordination national international effort planning technical level important ensure national ddr programme un support ddr operation work together integrated coherent way important ensure coordination following point n national ddr programme development n development ddr programme un mission agency n technical coordination bilateral partner ngo", "ProcessedSent": "important ensure coordination following point n national ddr programme development n development ddr programme un mission agency n technical coordination bilateral partner ngo", "SentID": 2918 }, { "ParagraphID": 948, - "Paragraph": "Coordination between the national DDR agency and UN mission\/system at the operational level should be established through the following: \\n the establishment of a JIU with mixed national\/international staff; \\n the provision of international technical assistance for implementation; \\n the coordination of national and international implementing agencies\/partners.", + "Paragraph": "Coordination between the national DDR agency and UN mission\/system at the operational level should be established through the following: \n the establishment of a JIU with mixed national\/international staff; \n the provision of international technical assistance for implementation; \n the coordination of national and international implementing agencies\/partners.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -52554,7 +52554,7 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Implementation\/Operational level", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Coordination between the national DDR agency and UN mission\/system at the operational level should be established through the following: \\n the establishment of a JIU with mixed national\/international staff; \\n the provision of international technical assistance for implementation; \\n the coordination of national and international implementing agencies\/partners.", + "Sentence": "Coordination between the national DDR agency and UN mission\/system at the operational level should be established through the following: \n the establishment of a JIU with mixed national\/international staff; \n the provision of international technical assistance for implementation; \n the coordination of national and international implementing agencies\/partners.", "newParagraph": "coordination national ddr agency un missionsystem operational level established following n establishment jiu mixed nationalinternational staff n provision international technical assistance implementation n coordination national international implementing agenciespartners", "ProcessedSent": "coordination national ddr agency un missionsystem operational level established following n establishment jiu mixed nationalinternational staff n provision international technical assistance implementation n coordination national international implementing agenciespartners", "SentID": 2919 @@ -52651,7 +52651,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 951, - "Paragraph": "The UN approach to the planning, management and monitoring of DDR programmes in a peacekeeping environment should be informed by the following factors: \\n Strength and legitimacy of governments: Post-conflict governments and their attendant bureaucracies may vary widely in terms of their strength and viability; their legitimacy in the eyes of the population; their level of existing capacities for programme devel- opment and management; the territorial extent and scope of government authority; and the degree to which the State has a monopoly over the means of violence in its territory. Taken together, these will affect the degree to which a given government can take effective ownership of and responsibility for DDR; \\n Technical capacities and knowledge: Even when post-conflict governments are legitimate and capable, they may lack the specific technical knowledge that is needed to link DDR to a national reconstruction plan and SSR; \\n Participation of civil society: In many post-conflict situations, civil society may have been repressed or marginalized and lack access to political decision-making processes. The representation of civil society at all levels in the body politic is essential, and the UN should support the participation and engagement of civil society in DDR processes wherever possible. Possible roles may include involvement in the policy development process (and particularly its link with transitional justice and equity issues); assistance with the identification of people associated with armed groups and forces, especially women and children; and implementing (particularly focusing on the involvement of local communities) and monitoring the effectiveness of DDR programmes.", + "Paragraph": "The UN approach to the planning, management and monitoring of DDR programmes in a peacekeeping environment should be informed by the following factors: \n Strength and legitimacy of governments: Post-conflict governments and their attendant bureaucracies may vary widely in terms of their strength and viability; their legitimacy in the eyes of the population; their level of existing capacities for programme devel- opment and management; the territorial extent and scope of government authority; and the degree to which the State has a monopoly over the means of violence in its territory. Taken together, these will affect the degree to which a given government can take effective ownership of and responsibility for DDR; \n Technical capacities and knowledge: Even when post-conflict governments are legitimate and capable, they may lack the specific technical knowledge that is needed to link DDR to a national reconstruction plan and SSR; \n Participation of civil society: In many post-conflict situations, civil society may have been repressed or marginalized and lack access to political decision-making processes. The representation of civil society at all levels in the body politic is essential, and the UN should support the participation and engagement of civil society in DDR processes wherever possible. Possible roles may include involvement in the policy development process (and particularly its link with transitional justice and equity issues); assistance with the identification of people associated with armed groups and forces, especially women and children; and implementing (particularly focusing on the involvement of local communities) and monitoring the effectiveness of DDR programmes.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -52662,14 +52662,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.1. Considerations in defining the role of the UN", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The UN approach to the planning, management and monitoring of DDR programmes in a peacekeeping environment should be informed by the following factors: \\n Strength and legitimacy of governments: Post-conflict governments and their attendant bureaucracies may vary widely in terms of their strength and viability; their legitimacy in the eyes of the population; their level of existing capacities for programme devel- opment and management; the territorial extent and scope of government authority; and the degree to which the State has a monopoly over the means of violence in its territory.", + "Sentence": "The UN approach to the planning, management and monitoring of DDR programmes in a peacekeeping environment should be informed by the following factors: \n Strength and legitimacy of governments: Post-conflict governments and their attendant bureaucracies may vary widely in terms of their strength and viability; their legitimacy in the eyes of the population; their level of existing capacities for programme devel- opment and management; the territorial extent and scope of government authority; and the degree to which the State has a monopoly over the means of violence in its territory.", "newParagraph": "un approach planning management monitoring ddr programme peacekeeping environment informed following factor n strength legitimacy government postconflict government attendant bureaucracy may vary widely term strength viability legitimacy eye population level existing capacity programme devel opment management territorial extent scope government authority degree state monopoly mean violence territory taken together affect degree given government take effective ownership responsibility ddr n technical capacity knowledge even postconflict government legitimate capable may lack specific technical knowledge needed link ddr national reconstruction plan ssr n participation civil society many postconflict situation civil society may repressed marginalized lack access political decisionmaking process representation civil society level body politic essential un support participation engagement civil society ddr process wherever possible possible role may include involvement policy development process particularly link transitional justice equity issue assistance identification people associated armed group force especially woman child implementing particularly focusing involvement local community monitoring effectiveness ddr programme", "ProcessedSent": "un approach planning management monitoring ddr programme peacekeeping environment informed following factor n strength legitimacy government postconflict government attendant bureaucracy may vary widely term strength viability legitimacy eye population level existing capacity programme devel opment management territorial extent scope government authority degree state monopoly mean violence territory", "SentID": 2925 }, { "ParagraphID": 951, - "Paragraph": "The UN approach to the planning, management and monitoring of DDR programmes in a peacekeeping environment should be informed by the following factors: \\n Strength and legitimacy of governments: Post-conflict governments and their attendant bureaucracies may vary widely in terms of their strength and viability; their legitimacy in the eyes of the population; their level of existing capacities for programme devel- opment and management; the territorial extent and scope of government authority; and the degree to which the State has a monopoly over the means of violence in its territory. Taken together, these will affect the degree to which a given government can take effective ownership of and responsibility for DDR; \\n Technical capacities and knowledge: Even when post-conflict governments are legitimate and capable, they may lack the specific technical knowledge that is needed to link DDR to a national reconstruction plan and SSR; \\n Participation of civil society: In many post-conflict situations, civil society may have been repressed or marginalized and lack access to political decision-making processes. The representation of civil society at all levels in the body politic is essential, and the UN should support the participation and engagement of civil society in DDR processes wherever possible. Possible roles may include involvement in the policy development process (and particularly its link with transitional justice and equity issues); assistance with the identification of people associated with armed groups and forces, especially women and children; and implementing (particularly focusing on the involvement of local communities) and monitoring the effectiveness of DDR programmes.", + "Paragraph": "The UN approach to the planning, management and monitoring of DDR programmes in a peacekeeping environment should be informed by the following factors: \n Strength and legitimacy of governments: Post-conflict governments and their attendant bureaucracies may vary widely in terms of their strength and viability; their legitimacy in the eyes of the population; their level of existing capacities for programme devel- opment and management; the territorial extent and scope of government authority; and the degree to which the State has a monopoly over the means of violence in its territory. Taken together, these will affect the degree to which a given government can take effective ownership of and responsibility for DDR; \n Technical capacities and knowledge: Even when post-conflict governments are legitimate and capable, they may lack the specific technical knowledge that is needed to link DDR to a national reconstruction plan and SSR; \n Participation of civil society: In many post-conflict situations, civil society may have been repressed or marginalized and lack access to political decision-making processes. The representation of civil society at all levels in the body politic is essential, and the UN should support the participation and engagement of civil society in DDR processes wherever possible. Possible roles may include involvement in the policy development process (and particularly its link with transitional justice and equity issues); assistance with the identification of people associated with armed groups and forces, especially women and children; and implementing (particularly focusing on the involvement of local communities) and monitoring the effectiveness of DDR programmes.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -52680,14 +52680,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.1. Considerations in defining the role of the UN", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Taken together, these will affect the degree to which a given government can take effective ownership of and responsibility for DDR; \\n Technical capacities and knowledge: Even when post-conflict governments are legitimate and capable, they may lack the specific technical knowledge that is needed to link DDR to a national reconstruction plan and SSR; \\n Participation of civil society: In many post-conflict situations, civil society may have been repressed or marginalized and lack access to political decision-making processes.", + "Sentence": "Taken together, these will affect the degree to which a given government can take effective ownership of and responsibility for DDR; \n Technical capacities and knowledge: Even when post-conflict governments are legitimate and capable, they may lack the specific technical knowledge that is needed to link DDR to a national reconstruction plan and SSR; \n Participation of civil society: In many post-conflict situations, civil society may have been repressed or marginalized and lack access to political decision-making processes.", "newParagraph": "un approach planning management monitoring ddr programme peacekeeping environment informed following factor n strength legitimacy government postconflict government attendant bureaucracy may vary widely term strength viability legitimacy eye population level existing capacity programme devel opment management territorial extent scope government authority degree state monopoly mean violence territory taken together affect degree given government take effective ownership responsibility ddr n technical capacity knowledge even postconflict government legitimate capable may lack specific technical knowledge needed link ddr national reconstruction plan ssr n participation civil society many postconflict situation civil society may repressed marginalized lack access political decisionmaking process representation civil society level body politic essential un support participation engagement civil society ddr process wherever possible possible role may include involvement policy development process particularly link transitional justice equity issue assistance identification people associated armed group force especially woman child implementing particularly focusing involvement local community monitoring effectiveness ddr programme", "ProcessedSent": "taken together affect degree given government take effective ownership responsibility ddr n technical capacity knowledge even postconflict government legitimate capable may lack specific technical knowledge needed link ddr national reconstruction plan ssr n participation civil society many postconflict situation civil society may repressed marginalized lack access political decisionmaking process", "SentID": 2926 }, { "ParagraphID": 951, - "Paragraph": "The UN approach to the planning, management and monitoring of DDR programmes in a peacekeeping environment should be informed by the following factors: \\n Strength and legitimacy of governments: Post-conflict governments and their attendant bureaucracies may vary widely in terms of their strength and viability; their legitimacy in the eyes of the population; their level of existing capacities for programme devel- opment and management; the territorial extent and scope of government authority; and the degree to which the State has a monopoly over the means of violence in its territory. Taken together, these will affect the degree to which a given government can take effective ownership of and responsibility for DDR; \\n Technical capacities and knowledge: Even when post-conflict governments are legitimate and capable, they may lack the specific technical knowledge that is needed to link DDR to a national reconstruction plan and SSR; \\n Participation of civil society: In many post-conflict situations, civil society may have been repressed or marginalized and lack access to political decision-making processes. The representation of civil society at all levels in the body politic is essential, and the UN should support the participation and engagement of civil society in DDR processes wherever possible. Possible roles may include involvement in the policy development process (and particularly its link with transitional justice and equity issues); assistance with the identification of people associated with armed groups and forces, especially women and children; and implementing (particularly focusing on the involvement of local communities) and monitoring the effectiveness of DDR programmes.", + "Paragraph": "The UN approach to the planning, management and monitoring of DDR programmes in a peacekeeping environment should be informed by the following factors: \n Strength and legitimacy of governments: Post-conflict governments and their attendant bureaucracies may vary widely in terms of their strength and viability; their legitimacy in the eyes of the population; their level of existing capacities for programme devel- opment and management; the territorial extent and scope of government authority; and the degree to which the State has a monopoly over the means of violence in its territory. Taken together, these will affect the degree to which a given government can take effective ownership of and responsibility for DDR; \n Technical capacities and knowledge: Even when post-conflict governments are legitimate and capable, they may lack the specific technical knowledge that is needed to link DDR to a national reconstruction plan and SSR; \n Participation of civil society: In many post-conflict situations, civil society may have been repressed or marginalized and lack access to political decision-making processes. The representation of civil society at all levels in the body politic is essential, and the UN should support the participation and engagement of civil society in DDR processes wherever possible. Possible roles may include involvement in the policy development process (and particularly its link with transitional justice and equity issues); assistance with the identification of people associated with armed groups and forces, especially women and children; and implementing (particularly focusing on the involvement of local communities) and monitoring the effectiveness of DDR programmes.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -52705,7 +52705,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 951, - "Paragraph": "The UN approach to the planning, management and monitoring of DDR programmes in a peacekeeping environment should be informed by the following factors: \\n Strength and legitimacy of governments: Post-conflict governments and their attendant bureaucracies may vary widely in terms of their strength and viability; their legitimacy in the eyes of the population; their level of existing capacities for programme devel- opment and management; the territorial extent and scope of government authority; and the degree to which the State has a monopoly over the means of violence in its territory. Taken together, these will affect the degree to which a given government can take effective ownership of and responsibility for DDR; \\n Technical capacities and knowledge: Even when post-conflict governments are legitimate and capable, they may lack the specific technical knowledge that is needed to link DDR to a national reconstruction plan and SSR; \\n Participation of civil society: In many post-conflict situations, civil society may have been repressed or marginalized and lack access to political decision-making processes. The representation of civil society at all levels in the body politic is essential, and the UN should support the participation and engagement of civil society in DDR processes wherever possible. Possible roles may include involvement in the policy development process (and particularly its link with transitional justice and equity issues); assistance with the identification of people associated with armed groups and forces, especially women and children; and implementing (particularly focusing on the involvement of local communities) and monitoring the effectiveness of DDR programmes.", + "Paragraph": "The UN approach to the planning, management and monitoring of DDR programmes in a peacekeeping environment should be informed by the following factors: \n Strength and legitimacy of governments: Post-conflict governments and their attendant bureaucracies may vary widely in terms of their strength and viability; their legitimacy in the eyes of the population; their level of existing capacities for programme devel- opment and management; the territorial extent and scope of government authority; and the degree to which the State has a monopoly over the means of violence in its territory. Taken together, these will affect the degree to which a given government can take effective ownership of and responsibility for DDR; \n Technical capacities and knowledge: Even when post-conflict governments are legitimate and capable, they may lack the specific technical knowledge that is needed to link DDR to a national reconstruction plan and SSR; \n Participation of civil society: In many post-conflict situations, civil society may have been repressed or marginalized and lack access to political decision-making processes. The representation of civil society at all levels in the body politic is essential, and the UN should support the participation and engagement of civil society in DDR processes wherever possible. Possible roles may include involvement in the policy development process (and particularly its link with transitional justice and equity issues); assistance with the identification of people associated with armed groups and forces, especially women and children; and implementing (particularly focusing on the involvement of local communities) and monitoring the effectiveness of DDR programmes.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -52741,7 +52741,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 953, - "Paragraph": "UN support to national efforts take place in the following areas (the actual degree of UN engagement should be determined on the basis of the considerations outlined above): \\n Political\/Strategic support: In order for the international community to provide political support to the DDR process, it is essential to understand the dynamics of both the conflict and the post-conflict period. By carrying out a stakeholder analysis (as part of a larger conflict assessment process), it will be possible to better understand the dynam- ics among national actors, and to identify DDR supporters and potential spoilers; \\n Institutional capacity development: It is important that capacity development strategies are established jointly with national authorities at the start of international involvement in DDR to ensure that the parties themselves take ownership of and responsibility for the success of the process. The UN system should play an important role in supporting the development of national and local capacities for DDR through providing technical assistance, establishing partnership arrangements with national institutions, and pro- viding training and capacity-building to local implementing partners; \\n Support for the establishment of legal frameworks: A key area in which international exper- tise can support the development of national capacities is in the drawing up of legal frameworks for DDR and related processes of SSR and weapons management. The UN system should draw on experiences from a range of political and legal systems, and assist national authorities in drafting appropriate legislation and legal instruments; \\n Technical assistance for policy and planning: Through the provision of technical assistance, the UN system should provide direct support to the development of national DDR policy and programmes. It is important to ensure, however, that this assistance is provided through partnership or mentoring arrangements that allow for knowledge and skills transfers to national staff, and to avoid situations where international experts take direct responsibility for programme functions within national institutions. When several international institutions are providing technical assistance to national authori- ties, it is important to ensure that this assistance is coordinated and coherent; \\n Direct support for implementation and financial management: The UN system may also be called upon, either by Security Council mandate or at the request of national authorities, to provide direct support for the implementation of certain components of a DDR pro- gramme, including the financial management of resources for DDR. A memorandum of understanding should be established between the UN and national authorities that defines the precise area of responsibility for programme delivery, mechanisms for co- ordination with local partners and clear reporting responsibilities; \\n Material\/Logistic support: In the post-conflict period, many national institutions lack both material and human resources. The UN system should provide material and logistic support to national DDR institutions and implementing agencies, particularly in the areas of: information and communications technology and equipment; transportation; rehabilitation, design and management of DDR sites, transit centres and other facilities; the establishment of information management and referral systems; and the procurement of basic goods for reinsertion kits, among others (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization and IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration); \\n Training programmes for national staff: The UN system should further support capacity development through the provision of training. There are a number of different training methodologies, including the provision of courses or seminars, training of trainers, on- the-job or continuous training, and exchanges with experts from other national DDR institutions. Although shortage of time and money may limit the training options that can be offered, it is important that the approach chosen builds skills through a continuous process of capacity development that transfers skills to local actors; \\n Support to local capacity development and community empowerment: Through local capacity development and community empowerment, the UN system should support local ownership of DDR processes and programmes. Since the success of the DDR process depends largely on the reintegration of individuals at the community level, it is im- portant to ensure that capacity development efforts are not restricted to assisting national authorities, but include direct support to communities in areas of reintegration. In particular, international agencies can help to build local capacities for participation in assessment and planning processes, project and financial management, reporting, and evaluation.", + "Paragraph": "UN support to national efforts take place in the following areas (the actual degree of UN engagement should be determined on the basis of the considerations outlined above): \n Political\/Strategic support: In order for the international community to provide political support to the DDR process, it is essential to understand the dynamics of both the conflict and the post-conflict period. By carrying out a stakeholder analysis (as part of a larger conflict assessment process), it will be possible to better understand the dynam- ics among national actors, and to identify DDR supporters and potential spoilers; \n Institutional capacity development: It is important that capacity development strategies are established jointly with national authorities at the start of international involvement in DDR to ensure that the parties themselves take ownership of and responsibility for the success of the process. The UN system should play an important role in supporting the development of national and local capacities for DDR through providing technical assistance, establishing partnership arrangements with national institutions, and pro- viding training and capacity-building to local implementing partners; \n Support for the establishment of legal frameworks: A key area in which international exper- tise can support the development of national capacities is in the drawing up of legal frameworks for DDR and related processes of SSR and weapons management. The UN system should draw on experiences from a range of political and legal systems, and assist national authorities in drafting appropriate legislation and legal instruments; \n Technical assistance for policy and planning: Through the provision of technical assistance, the UN system should provide direct support to the development of national DDR policy and programmes. It is important to ensure, however, that this assistance is provided through partnership or mentoring arrangements that allow for knowledge and skills transfers to national staff, and to avoid situations where international experts take direct responsibility for programme functions within national institutions. When several international institutions are providing technical assistance to national authori- ties, it is important to ensure that this assistance is coordinated and coherent; \n Direct support for implementation and financial management: The UN system may also be called upon, either by Security Council mandate or at the request of national authorities, to provide direct support for the implementation of certain components of a DDR pro- gramme, including the financial management of resources for DDR. A memorandum of understanding should be established between the UN and national authorities that defines the precise area of responsibility for programme delivery, mechanisms for co- ordination with local partners and clear reporting responsibilities; \n Material\/Logistic support: In the post-conflict period, many national institutions lack both material and human resources. The UN system should provide material and logistic support to national DDR institutions and implementing agencies, particularly in the areas of: information and communications technology and equipment; transportation; rehabilitation, design and management of DDR sites, transit centres and other facilities; the establishment of information management and referral systems; and the procurement of basic goods for reinsertion kits, among others (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization and IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration); \n Training programmes for national staff: The UN system should further support capacity development through the provision of training. There are a number of different training methodologies, including the provision of courses or seminars, training of trainers, on- the-job or continuous training, and exchanges with experts from other national DDR institutions. Although shortage of time and money may limit the training options that can be offered, it is important that the approach chosen builds skills through a continuous process of capacity development that transfers skills to local actors; \n Support to local capacity development and community empowerment: Through local capacity development and community empowerment, the UN system should support local ownership of DDR processes and programmes. Since the success of the DDR process depends largely on the reintegration of individuals at the community level, it is im- portant to ensure that capacity development efforts are not restricted to assisting national authorities, but include direct support to communities in areas of reintegration. In particular, international agencies can help to build local capacities for participation in assessment and planning processes, project and financial management, reporting, and evaluation.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -52752,14 +52752,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.2. Areas of UN support", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "UN support to national efforts take place in the following areas (the actual degree of UN engagement should be determined on the basis of the considerations outlined above): \\n Political\/Strategic support: In order for the international community to provide political support to the DDR process, it is essential to understand the dynamics of both the conflict and the post-conflict period.", + "Sentence": "UN support to national efforts take place in the following areas (the actual degree of UN engagement should be determined on the basis of the considerations outlined above): \n Political\/Strategic support: In order for the international community to provide political support to the DDR process, it is essential to understand the dynamics of both the conflict and the post-conflict period.", "newParagraph": "un support national effort take place following area actual degree un engagement determined basis consideration outlined n politicalstrategic support order international community provide political support ddr process essential understand dynamic conflict postconflict period carrying stakeholder analysis part larger conflict assessment process possible better understand dynam ic among national actor identify ddr supporter potential spoiler n institutional capacity development important capacity development strategy established jointly national authority start international involvement ddr ensure party take ownership responsibility success process un system play important role supporting development national local capacity ddr providing technical assistance establishing partnership arrangement national institution pro viding training capacitybuilding local implementing partner n support establishment legal framework key area international exper tise support development national capacity drawing legal framework ddr related process ssr weapon management un system draw experience range political legal system assist national authority drafting appropriate legislation legal instrument n technical assistance policy planning provision technical assistance un system provide direct support development national ddr policy programme important ensure however assistance provided partnership mentoring arrangement allow knowledge skill transfer national staff avoid situation international expert take direct responsibility programme function within national institution several international institution providing technical assistance national authori tie important ensure assistance coordinated coherent n direct support implementation financial management un system may also called upon either security council mandate request national authority provide direct support implementation certain component ddr pro gramme including financial management resource ddr memorandum understanding established un national authority defines precise area responsibility programme delivery mechanism co ordination local partner clear reporting responsibility n materiallogistic support postconflict period many national institution lack material human resource un system provide material logistic support national ddr institution implementing agency particularly area information communication technology equipment transportation rehabilitation design management ddr site transit centre facility establishment information management referral system procurement basic good reinsertion kit among others also see iddrs 410 disarmament iddrs 420 demobilization iddrs 430 social economic reintegration n training programme national staff un system support capacity development provision training number different training methodology including provision course seminar training trainer thejob continuous training exchange expert national ddr institution although shortage time money may limit training option offered important approach chosen build skill continuous process capacity development transfer skill local actor n support local capacity development community empowerment local capacity development community empowerment un system support local ownership ddr process programme since success ddr process depends largely reintegration individual community level im portant ensure capacity development effort restricted assisting national authority include direct support community area reintegration particular international agency help build local capacity participation assessment planning process project financial management reporting evaluation", "ProcessedSent": "un support national effort take place following area actual degree un engagement determined basis consideration outlined n politicalstrategic support order international community provide political support ddr process essential understand dynamic conflict postconflict period", "SentID": 2930 }, { "ParagraphID": 953, - "Paragraph": "UN support to national efforts take place in the following areas (the actual degree of UN engagement should be determined on the basis of the considerations outlined above): \\n Political\/Strategic support: In order for the international community to provide political support to the DDR process, it is essential to understand the dynamics of both the conflict and the post-conflict period. By carrying out a stakeholder analysis (as part of a larger conflict assessment process), it will be possible to better understand the dynam- ics among national actors, and to identify DDR supporters and potential spoilers; \\n Institutional capacity development: It is important that capacity development strategies are established jointly with national authorities at the start of international involvement in DDR to ensure that the parties themselves take ownership of and responsibility for the success of the process. The UN system should play an important role in supporting the development of national and local capacities for DDR through providing technical assistance, establishing partnership arrangements with national institutions, and pro- viding training and capacity-building to local implementing partners; \\n Support for the establishment of legal frameworks: A key area in which international exper- tise can support the development of national capacities is in the drawing up of legal frameworks for DDR and related processes of SSR and weapons management. The UN system should draw on experiences from a range of political and legal systems, and assist national authorities in drafting appropriate legislation and legal instruments; \\n Technical assistance for policy and planning: Through the provision of technical assistance, the UN system should provide direct support to the development of national DDR policy and programmes. It is important to ensure, however, that this assistance is provided through partnership or mentoring arrangements that allow for knowledge and skills transfers to national staff, and to avoid situations where international experts take direct responsibility for programme functions within national institutions. When several international institutions are providing technical assistance to national authori- ties, it is important to ensure that this assistance is coordinated and coherent; \\n Direct support for implementation and financial management: The UN system may also be called upon, either by Security Council mandate or at the request of national authorities, to provide direct support for the implementation of certain components of a DDR pro- gramme, including the financial management of resources for DDR. A memorandum of understanding should be established between the UN and national authorities that defines the precise area of responsibility for programme delivery, mechanisms for co- ordination with local partners and clear reporting responsibilities; \\n Material\/Logistic support: In the post-conflict period, many national institutions lack both material and human resources. The UN system should provide material and logistic support to national DDR institutions and implementing agencies, particularly in the areas of: information and communications technology and equipment; transportation; rehabilitation, design and management of DDR sites, transit centres and other facilities; the establishment of information management and referral systems; and the procurement of basic goods for reinsertion kits, among others (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization and IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration); \\n Training programmes for national staff: The UN system should further support capacity development through the provision of training. There are a number of different training methodologies, including the provision of courses or seminars, training of trainers, on- the-job or continuous training, and exchanges with experts from other national DDR institutions. Although shortage of time and money may limit the training options that can be offered, it is important that the approach chosen builds skills through a continuous process of capacity development that transfers skills to local actors; \\n Support to local capacity development and community empowerment: Through local capacity development and community empowerment, the UN system should support local ownership of DDR processes and programmes. Since the success of the DDR process depends largely on the reintegration of individuals at the community level, it is im- portant to ensure that capacity development efforts are not restricted to assisting national authorities, but include direct support to communities in areas of reintegration. In particular, international agencies can help to build local capacities for participation in assessment and planning processes, project and financial management, reporting, and evaluation.", + "Paragraph": "UN support to national efforts take place in the following areas (the actual degree of UN engagement should be determined on the basis of the considerations outlined above): \n Political\/Strategic support: In order for the international community to provide political support to the DDR process, it is essential to understand the dynamics of both the conflict and the post-conflict period. By carrying out a stakeholder analysis (as part of a larger conflict assessment process), it will be possible to better understand the dynam- ics among national actors, and to identify DDR supporters and potential spoilers; \n Institutional capacity development: It is important that capacity development strategies are established jointly with national authorities at the start of international involvement in DDR to ensure that the parties themselves take ownership of and responsibility for the success of the process. The UN system should play an important role in supporting the development of national and local capacities for DDR through providing technical assistance, establishing partnership arrangements with national institutions, and pro- viding training and capacity-building to local implementing partners; \n Support for the establishment of legal frameworks: A key area in which international exper- tise can support the development of national capacities is in the drawing up of legal frameworks for DDR and related processes of SSR and weapons management. The UN system should draw on experiences from a range of political and legal systems, and assist national authorities in drafting appropriate legislation and legal instruments; \n Technical assistance for policy and planning: Through the provision of technical assistance, the UN system should provide direct support to the development of national DDR policy and programmes. It is important to ensure, however, that this assistance is provided through partnership or mentoring arrangements that allow for knowledge and skills transfers to national staff, and to avoid situations where international experts take direct responsibility for programme functions within national institutions. When several international institutions are providing technical assistance to national authori- ties, it is important to ensure that this assistance is coordinated and coherent; \n Direct support for implementation and financial management: The UN system may also be called upon, either by Security Council mandate or at the request of national authorities, to provide direct support for the implementation of certain components of a DDR pro- gramme, including the financial management of resources for DDR. A memorandum of understanding should be established between the UN and national authorities that defines the precise area of responsibility for programme delivery, mechanisms for co- ordination with local partners and clear reporting responsibilities; \n Material\/Logistic support: In the post-conflict period, many national institutions lack both material and human resources. The UN system should provide material and logistic support to national DDR institutions and implementing agencies, particularly in the areas of: information and communications technology and equipment; transportation; rehabilitation, design and management of DDR sites, transit centres and other facilities; the establishment of information management and referral systems; and the procurement of basic goods for reinsertion kits, among others (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization and IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration); \n Training programmes for national staff: The UN system should further support capacity development through the provision of training. There are a number of different training methodologies, including the provision of courses or seminars, training of trainers, on- the-job or continuous training, and exchanges with experts from other national DDR institutions. Although shortage of time and money may limit the training options that can be offered, it is important that the approach chosen builds skills through a continuous process of capacity development that transfers skills to local actors; \n Support to local capacity development and community empowerment: Through local capacity development and community empowerment, the UN system should support local ownership of DDR processes and programmes. Since the success of the DDR process depends largely on the reintegration of individuals at the community level, it is im- portant to ensure that capacity development efforts are not restricted to assisting national authorities, but include direct support to communities in areas of reintegration. In particular, international agencies can help to build local capacities for participation in assessment and planning processes, project and financial management, reporting, and evaluation.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -52770,14 +52770,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.2. Areas of UN support", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "By carrying out a stakeholder analysis (as part of a larger conflict assessment process), it will be possible to better understand the dynam- ics among national actors, and to identify DDR supporters and potential spoilers; \\n Institutional capacity development: It is important that capacity development strategies are established jointly with national authorities at the start of international involvement in DDR to ensure that the parties themselves take ownership of and responsibility for the success of the process.", + "Sentence": "By carrying out a stakeholder analysis (as part of a larger conflict assessment process), it will be possible to better understand the dynam- ics among national actors, and to identify DDR supporters and potential spoilers; \n Institutional capacity development: It is important that capacity development strategies are established jointly with national authorities at the start of international involvement in DDR to ensure that the parties themselves take ownership of and responsibility for the success of the process.", "newParagraph": "un support national effort take place following area actual degree un engagement determined basis consideration outlined n politicalstrategic support order international community provide political support ddr process essential understand dynamic conflict postconflict period carrying stakeholder analysis part larger conflict assessment process possible better understand dynam ic among national actor identify ddr supporter potential spoiler n institutional capacity development important capacity development strategy established jointly national authority start international involvement ddr ensure party take ownership responsibility success process un system play important role supporting development national local capacity ddr providing technical assistance establishing partnership arrangement national institution pro viding training capacitybuilding local implementing partner n support establishment legal framework key area international exper tise support development national capacity drawing legal framework ddr related process ssr weapon management un system draw experience range political legal system assist national authority drafting appropriate legislation legal instrument n technical assistance policy planning provision technical assistance un system provide direct support development national ddr policy programme important ensure however assistance provided partnership mentoring arrangement allow knowledge skill transfer national staff avoid situation international expert take direct responsibility programme function within national institution several international institution providing technical assistance national authori tie important ensure assistance coordinated coherent n direct support implementation financial management un system may also called upon either security council mandate request national authority provide direct support implementation certain component ddr pro gramme including financial management resource ddr memorandum understanding established un national authority defines precise area responsibility programme delivery mechanism co ordination local partner clear reporting responsibility n materiallogistic support postconflict period many national institution lack material human resource un system provide material logistic support national ddr institution implementing agency particularly area information communication technology equipment transportation rehabilitation design management ddr site transit centre facility establishment information management referral system procurement basic good reinsertion kit among others also see iddrs 410 disarmament iddrs 420 demobilization iddrs 430 social economic reintegration n training programme national staff un system support capacity development provision training number different training methodology including provision course seminar training trainer thejob continuous training exchange expert national ddr institution although shortage time money may limit training option offered important approach chosen build skill continuous process capacity development transfer skill local actor n support local capacity development community empowerment local capacity development community empowerment un system support local ownership ddr process programme since success ddr process depends largely reintegration individual community level im portant ensure capacity development effort restricted assisting national authority include direct support community area reintegration particular international agency help build local capacity participation assessment planning process project financial management reporting evaluation", "ProcessedSent": "carrying stakeholder analysis part larger conflict assessment process possible better understand dynam ic among national actor identify ddr supporter potential spoiler n institutional capacity development important capacity development strategy established jointly national authority start international involvement ddr ensure party take ownership responsibility success process", "SentID": 2931 }, { "ParagraphID": 953, - "Paragraph": "UN support to national efforts take place in the following areas (the actual degree of UN engagement should be determined on the basis of the considerations outlined above): \\n Political\/Strategic support: In order for the international community to provide political support to the DDR process, it is essential to understand the dynamics of both the conflict and the post-conflict period. By carrying out a stakeholder analysis (as part of a larger conflict assessment process), it will be possible to better understand the dynam- ics among national actors, and to identify DDR supporters and potential spoilers; \\n Institutional capacity development: It is important that capacity development strategies are established jointly with national authorities at the start of international involvement in DDR to ensure that the parties themselves take ownership of and responsibility for the success of the process. The UN system should play an important role in supporting the development of national and local capacities for DDR through providing technical assistance, establishing partnership arrangements with national institutions, and pro- viding training and capacity-building to local implementing partners; \\n Support for the establishment of legal frameworks: A key area in which international exper- tise can support the development of national capacities is in the drawing up of legal frameworks for DDR and related processes of SSR and weapons management. The UN system should draw on experiences from a range of political and legal systems, and assist national authorities in drafting appropriate legislation and legal instruments; \\n Technical assistance for policy and planning: Through the provision of technical assistance, the UN system should provide direct support to the development of national DDR policy and programmes. It is important to ensure, however, that this assistance is provided through partnership or mentoring arrangements that allow for knowledge and skills transfers to national staff, and to avoid situations where international experts take direct responsibility for programme functions within national institutions. When several international institutions are providing technical assistance to national authori- ties, it is important to ensure that this assistance is coordinated and coherent; \\n Direct support for implementation and financial management: The UN system may also be called upon, either by Security Council mandate or at the request of national authorities, to provide direct support for the implementation of certain components of a DDR pro- gramme, including the financial management of resources for DDR. A memorandum of understanding should be established between the UN and national authorities that defines the precise area of responsibility for programme delivery, mechanisms for co- ordination with local partners and clear reporting responsibilities; \\n Material\/Logistic support: In the post-conflict period, many national institutions lack both material and human resources. The UN system should provide material and logistic support to national DDR institutions and implementing agencies, particularly in the areas of: information and communications technology and equipment; transportation; rehabilitation, design and management of DDR sites, transit centres and other facilities; the establishment of information management and referral systems; and the procurement of basic goods for reinsertion kits, among others (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization and IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration); \\n Training programmes for national staff: The UN system should further support capacity development through the provision of training. There are a number of different training methodologies, including the provision of courses or seminars, training of trainers, on- the-job or continuous training, and exchanges with experts from other national DDR institutions. Although shortage of time and money may limit the training options that can be offered, it is important that the approach chosen builds skills through a continuous process of capacity development that transfers skills to local actors; \\n Support to local capacity development and community empowerment: Through local capacity development and community empowerment, the UN system should support local ownership of DDR processes and programmes. Since the success of the DDR process depends largely on the reintegration of individuals at the community level, it is im- portant to ensure that capacity development efforts are not restricted to assisting national authorities, but include direct support to communities in areas of reintegration. In particular, international agencies can help to build local capacities for participation in assessment and planning processes, project and financial management, reporting, and evaluation.", + "Paragraph": "UN support to national efforts take place in the following areas (the actual degree of UN engagement should be determined on the basis of the considerations outlined above): \n Political\/Strategic support: In order for the international community to provide political support to the DDR process, it is essential to understand the dynamics of both the conflict and the post-conflict period. By carrying out a stakeholder analysis (as part of a larger conflict assessment process), it will be possible to better understand the dynam- ics among national actors, and to identify DDR supporters and potential spoilers; \n Institutional capacity development: It is important that capacity development strategies are established jointly with national authorities at the start of international involvement in DDR to ensure that the parties themselves take ownership of and responsibility for the success of the process. The UN system should play an important role in supporting the development of national and local capacities for DDR through providing technical assistance, establishing partnership arrangements with national institutions, and pro- viding training and capacity-building to local implementing partners; \n Support for the establishment of legal frameworks: A key area in which international exper- tise can support the development of national capacities is in the drawing up of legal frameworks for DDR and related processes of SSR and weapons management. The UN system should draw on experiences from a range of political and legal systems, and assist national authorities in drafting appropriate legislation and legal instruments; \n Technical assistance for policy and planning: Through the provision of technical assistance, the UN system should provide direct support to the development of national DDR policy and programmes. It is important to ensure, however, that this assistance is provided through partnership or mentoring arrangements that allow for knowledge and skills transfers to national staff, and to avoid situations where international experts take direct responsibility for programme functions within national institutions. When several international institutions are providing technical assistance to national authori- ties, it is important to ensure that this assistance is coordinated and coherent; \n Direct support for implementation and financial management: The UN system may also be called upon, either by Security Council mandate or at the request of national authorities, to provide direct support for the implementation of certain components of a DDR pro- gramme, including the financial management of resources for DDR. A memorandum of understanding should be established between the UN and national authorities that defines the precise area of responsibility for programme delivery, mechanisms for co- ordination with local partners and clear reporting responsibilities; \n Material\/Logistic support: In the post-conflict period, many national institutions lack both material and human resources. The UN system should provide material and logistic support to national DDR institutions and implementing agencies, particularly in the areas of: information and communications technology and equipment; transportation; rehabilitation, design and management of DDR sites, transit centres and other facilities; the establishment of information management and referral systems; and the procurement of basic goods for reinsertion kits, among others (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization and IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration); \n Training programmes for national staff: The UN system should further support capacity development through the provision of training. There are a number of different training methodologies, including the provision of courses or seminars, training of trainers, on- the-job or continuous training, and exchanges with experts from other national DDR institutions. Although shortage of time and money may limit the training options that can be offered, it is important that the approach chosen builds skills through a continuous process of capacity development that transfers skills to local actors; \n Support to local capacity development and community empowerment: Through local capacity development and community empowerment, the UN system should support local ownership of DDR processes and programmes. Since the success of the DDR process depends largely on the reintegration of individuals at the community level, it is im- portant to ensure that capacity development efforts are not restricted to assisting national authorities, but include direct support to communities in areas of reintegration. In particular, international agencies can help to build local capacities for participation in assessment and planning processes, project and financial management, reporting, and evaluation.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -52788,14 +52788,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.2. Areas of UN support", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The UN system should play an important role in supporting the development of national and local capacities for DDR through providing technical assistance, establishing partnership arrangements with national institutions, and pro- viding training and capacity-building to local implementing partners; \\n Support for the establishment of legal frameworks: A key area in which international exper- tise can support the development of national capacities is in the drawing up of legal frameworks for DDR and related processes of SSR and weapons management.", + "Sentence": "The UN system should play an important role in supporting the development of national and local capacities for DDR through providing technical assistance, establishing partnership arrangements with national institutions, and pro- viding training and capacity-building to local implementing partners; \n Support for the establishment of legal frameworks: A key area in which international exper- tise can support the development of national capacities is in the drawing up of legal frameworks for DDR and related processes of SSR and weapons management.", "newParagraph": "un support national effort take place following area actual degree un engagement determined basis consideration outlined n politicalstrategic support order international community provide political support ddr process essential understand dynamic conflict postconflict period carrying stakeholder analysis part larger conflict assessment process possible better understand dynam ic among national actor identify ddr supporter potential spoiler n institutional capacity development important capacity development strategy established jointly national authority start international involvement ddr ensure party take ownership responsibility success process un system play important role supporting development national local capacity ddr providing technical assistance establishing partnership arrangement national institution pro viding training capacitybuilding local implementing partner n support establishment legal framework key area international exper tise support development national capacity drawing legal framework ddr related process ssr weapon management un system draw experience range political legal system assist national authority drafting appropriate legislation legal instrument n technical assistance policy planning provision technical assistance un system provide direct support development national ddr policy programme important ensure however assistance provided partnership mentoring arrangement allow knowledge skill transfer national staff avoid situation international expert take direct responsibility programme function within national institution several international institution providing technical assistance national authori tie important ensure assistance coordinated coherent n direct support implementation financial management un system may also called upon either security council mandate request national authority provide direct support implementation certain component ddr pro gramme including financial management resource ddr memorandum understanding established un national authority defines precise area responsibility programme delivery mechanism co ordination local partner clear reporting responsibility n materiallogistic support postconflict period many national institution lack material human resource un system provide material logistic support national ddr institution implementing agency particularly area information communication technology equipment transportation rehabilitation design management ddr site transit centre facility establishment information management referral system procurement basic good reinsertion kit among others also see iddrs 410 disarmament iddrs 420 demobilization iddrs 430 social economic reintegration n training programme national staff un system support capacity development provision training number different training methodology including provision course seminar training trainer thejob continuous training exchange expert national ddr institution although shortage time money may limit training option offered important approach chosen build skill continuous process capacity development transfer skill local actor n support local capacity development community empowerment local capacity development community empowerment un system support local ownership ddr process programme since success ddr process depends largely reintegration individual community level im portant ensure capacity development effort restricted assisting national authority include direct support community area reintegration particular international agency help build local capacity participation assessment planning process project financial management reporting evaluation", "ProcessedSent": "un system play important role supporting development national local capacity ddr providing technical assistance establishing partnership arrangement national institution pro viding training capacitybuilding local implementing partner n support establishment legal framework key area international exper tise support development national capacity drawing legal framework ddr related process ssr weapon management", "SentID": 2932 }, { "ParagraphID": 953, - "Paragraph": "UN support to national efforts take place in the following areas (the actual degree of UN engagement should be determined on the basis of the considerations outlined above): \\n Political\/Strategic support: In order for the international community to provide political support to the DDR process, it is essential to understand the dynamics of both the conflict and the post-conflict period. By carrying out a stakeholder analysis (as part of a larger conflict assessment process), it will be possible to better understand the dynam- ics among national actors, and to identify DDR supporters and potential spoilers; \\n Institutional capacity development: It is important that capacity development strategies are established jointly with national authorities at the start of international involvement in DDR to ensure that the parties themselves take ownership of and responsibility for the success of the process. The UN system should play an important role in supporting the development of national and local capacities for DDR through providing technical assistance, establishing partnership arrangements with national institutions, and pro- viding training and capacity-building to local implementing partners; \\n Support for the establishment of legal frameworks: A key area in which international exper- tise can support the development of national capacities is in the drawing up of legal frameworks for DDR and related processes of SSR and weapons management. The UN system should draw on experiences from a range of political and legal systems, and assist national authorities in drafting appropriate legislation and legal instruments; \\n Technical assistance for policy and planning: Through the provision of technical assistance, the UN system should provide direct support to the development of national DDR policy and programmes. It is important to ensure, however, that this assistance is provided through partnership or mentoring arrangements that allow for knowledge and skills transfers to national staff, and to avoid situations where international experts take direct responsibility for programme functions within national institutions. When several international institutions are providing technical assistance to national authori- ties, it is important to ensure that this assistance is coordinated and coherent; \\n Direct support for implementation and financial management: The UN system may also be called upon, either by Security Council mandate or at the request of national authorities, to provide direct support for the implementation of certain components of a DDR pro- gramme, including the financial management of resources for DDR. A memorandum of understanding should be established between the UN and national authorities that defines the precise area of responsibility for programme delivery, mechanisms for co- ordination with local partners and clear reporting responsibilities; \\n Material\/Logistic support: In the post-conflict period, many national institutions lack both material and human resources. The UN system should provide material and logistic support to national DDR institutions and implementing agencies, particularly in the areas of: information and communications technology and equipment; transportation; rehabilitation, design and management of DDR sites, transit centres and other facilities; the establishment of information management and referral systems; and the procurement of basic goods for reinsertion kits, among others (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization and IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration); \\n Training programmes for national staff: The UN system should further support capacity development through the provision of training. There are a number of different training methodologies, including the provision of courses or seminars, training of trainers, on- the-job or continuous training, and exchanges with experts from other national DDR institutions. Although shortage of time and money may limit the training options that can be offered, it is important that the approach chosen builds skills through a continuous process of capacity development that transfers skills to local actors; \\n Support to local capacity development and community empowerment: Through local capacity development and community empowerment, the UN system should support local ownership of DDR processes and programmes. Since the success of the DDR process depends largely on the reintegration of individuals at the community level, it is im- portant to ensure that capacity development efforts are not restricted to assisting national authorities, but include direct support to communities in areas of reintegration. In particular, international agencies can help to build local capacities for participation in assessment and planning processes, project and financial management, reporting, and evaluation.", + "Paragraph": "UN support to national efforts take place in the following areas (the actual degree of UN engagement should be determined on the basis of the considerations outlined above): \n Political\/Strategic support: In order for the international community to provide political support to the DDR process, it is essential to understand the dynamics of both the conflict and the post-conflict period. By carrying out a stakeholder analysis (as part of a larger conflict assessment process), it will be possible to better understand the dynam- ics among national actors, and to identify DDR supporters and potential spoilers; \n Institutional capacity development: It is important that capacity development strategies are established jointly with national authorities at the start of international involvement in DDR to ensure that the parties themselves take ownership of and responsibility for the success of the process. The UN system should play an important role in supporting the development of national and local capacities for DDR through providing technical assistance, establishing partnership arrangements with national institutions, and pro- viding training and capacity-building to local implementing partners; \n Support for the establishment of legal frameworks: A key area in which international exper- tise can support the development of national capacities is in the drawing up of legal frameworks for DDR and related processes of SSR and weapons management. The UN system should draw on experiences from a range of political and legal systems, and assist national authorities in drafting appropriate legislation and legal instruments; \n Technical assistance for policy and planning: Through the provision of technical assistance, the UN system should provide direct support to the development of national DDR policy and programmes. It is important to ensure, however, that this assistance is provided through partnership or mentoring arrangements that allow for knowledge and skills transfers to national staff, and to avoid situations where international experts take direct responsibility for programme functions within national institutions. When several international institutions are providing technical assistance to national authori- ties, it is important to ensure that this assistance is coordinated and coherent; \n Direct support for implementation and financial management: The UN system may also be called upon, either by Security Council mandate or at the request of national authorities, to provide direct support for the implementation of certain components of a DDR pro- gramme, including the financial management of resources for DDR. A memorandum of understanding should be established between the UN and national authorities that defines the precise area of responsibility for programme delivery, mechanisms for co- ordination with local partners and clear reporting responsibilities; \n Material\/Logistic support: In the post-conflict period, many national institutions lack both material and human resources. The UN system should provide material and logistic support to national DDR institutions and implementing agencies, particularly in the areas of: information and communications technology and equipment; transportation; rehabilitation, design and management of DDR sites, transit centres and other facilities; the establishment of information management and referral systems; and the procurement of basic goods for reinsertion kits, among others (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization and IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration); \n Training programmes for national staff: The UN system should further support capacity development through the provision of training. There are a number of different training methodologies, including the provision of courses or seminars, training of trainers, on- the-job or continuous training, and exchanges with experts from other national DDR institutions. Although shortage of time and money may limit the training options that can be offered, it is important that the approach chosen builds skills through a continuous process of capacity development that transfers skills to local actors; \n Support to local capacity development and community empowerment: Through local capacity development and community empowerment, the UN system should support local ownership of DDR processes and programmes. Since the success of the DDR process depends largely on the reintegration of individuals at the community level, it is im- portant to ensure that capacity development efforts are not restricted to assisting national authorities, but include direct support to communities in areas of reintegration. In particular, international agencies can help to build local capacities for participation in assessment and planning processes, project and financial management, reporting, and evaluation.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -52806,14 +52806,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.2. Areas of UN support", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The UN system should draw on experiences from a range of political and legal systems, and assist national authorities in drafting appropriate legislation and legal instruments; \\n Technical assistance for policy and planning: Through the provision of technical assistance, the UN system should provide direct support to the development of national DDR policy and programmes.", + "Sentence": "The UN system should draw on experiences from a range of political and legal systems, and assist national authorities in drafting appropriate legislation and legal instruments; \n Technical assistance for policy and planning: Through the provision of technical assistance, the UN system should provide direct support to the development of national DDR policy and programmes.", "newParagraph": "un support national effort take place following area actual degree un engagement determined basis consideration outlined n politicalstrategic support order international community provide political support ddr process essential understand dynamic conflict postconflict period carrying stakeholder analysis part larger conflict assessment process possible better understand dynam ic among national actor identify ddr supporter potential spoiler n institutional capacity development important capacity development strategy established jointly national authority start international involvement ddr ensure party take ownership responsibility success process un system play important role supporting development national local capacity ddr providing technical assistance establishing partnership arrangement national institution pro viding training capacitybuilding local implementing partner n support establishment legal framework key area international exper tise support development national capacity drawing legal framework ddr related process ssr weapon management un system draw experience range political legal system assist national authority drafting appropriate legislation legal instrument n technical assistance policy planning provision technical assistance un system provide direct support development national ddr policy programme important ensure however assistance provided partnership mentoring arrangement allow knowledge skill transfer national staff avoid situation international expert take direct responsibility programme function within national institution several international institution providing technical assistance national authori tie important ensure assistance coordinated coherent n direct support implementation financial management un system may also called upon either security council mandate request national authority provide direct support implementation certain component ddr pro gramme including financial management resource ddr memorandum understanding established un national authority defines precise area responsibility programme delivery mechanism co ordination local partner clear reporting responsibility n materiallogistic support postconflict period many national institution lack material human resource un system provide material logistic support national ddr institution implementing agency particularly area information communication technology equipment transportation rehabilitation design management ddr site transit centre facility establishment information management referral system procurement basic good reinsertion kit among others also see iddrs 410 disarmament iddrs 420 demobilization iddrs 430 social economic reintegration n training programme national staff un system support capacity development provision training number different training methodology including provision course seminar training trainer thejob continuous training exchange expert national ddr institution although shortage time money may limit training option offered important approach chosen build skill continuous process capacity development transfer skill local actor n support local capacity development community empowerment local capacity development community empowerment un system support local ownership ddr process programme since success ddr process depends largely reintegration individual community level im portant ensure capacity development effort restricted assisting national authority include direct support community area reintegration particular international agency help build local capacity participation assessment planning process project financial management reporting evaluation", "ProcessedSent": "un system draw experience range political legal system assist national authority drafting appropriate legislation legal instrument n technical assistance policy planning provision technical assistance un system provide direct support development national ddr policy programme", "SentID": 2933 }, { "ParagraphID": 953, - "Paragraph": "UN support to national efforts take place in the following areas (the actual degree of UN engagement should be determined on the basis of the considerations outlined above): \\n Political\/Strategic support: In order for the international community to provide political support to the DDR process, it is essential to understand the dynamics of both the conflict and the post-conflict period. By carrying out a stakeholder analysis (as part of a larger conflict assessment process), it will be possible to better understand the dynam- ics among national actors, and to identify DDR supporters and potential spoilers; \\n Institutional capacity development: It is important that capacity development strategies are established jointly with national authorities at the start of international involvement in DDR to ensure that the parties themselves take ownership of and responsibility for the success of the process. The UN system should play an important role in supporting the development of national and local capacities for DDR through providing technical assistance, establishing partnership arrangements with national institutions, and pro- viding training and capacity-building to local implementing partners; \\n Support for the establishment of legal frameworks: A key area in which international exper- tise can support the development of national capacities is in the drawing up of legal frameworks for DDR and related processes of SSR and weapons management. The UN system should draw on experiences from a range of political and legal systems, and assist national authorities in drafting appropriate legislation and legal instruments; \\n Technical assistance for policy and planning: Through the provision of technical assistance, the UN system should provide direct support to the development of national DDR policy and programmes. It is important to ensure, however, that this assistance is provided through partnership or mentoring arrangements that allow for knowledge and skills transfers to national staff, and to avoid situations where international experts take direct responsibility for programme functions within national institutions. When several international institutions are providing technical assistance to national authori- ties, it is important to ensure that this assistance is coordinated and coherent; \\n Direct support for implementation and financial management: The UN system may also be called upon, either by Security Council mandate or at the request of national authorities, to provide direct support for the implementation of certain components of a DDR pro- gramme, including the financial management of resources for DDR. A memorandum of understanding should be established between the UN and national authorities that defines the precise area of responsibility for programme delivery, mechanisms for co- ordination with local partners and clear reporting responsibilities; \\n Material\/Logistic support: In the post-conflict period, many national institutions lack both material and human resources. The UN system should provide material and logistic support to national DDR institutions and implementing agencies, particularly in the areas of: information and communications technology and equipment; transportation; rehabilitation, design and management of DDR sites, transit centres and other facilities; the establishment of information management and referral systems; and the procurement of basic goods for reinsertion kits, among others (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization and IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration); \\n Training programmes for national staff: The UN system should further support capacity development through the provision of training. There are a number of different training methodologies, including the provision of courses or seminars, training of trainers, on- the-job or continuous training, and exchanges with experts from other national DDR institutions. Although shortage of time and money may limit the training options that can be offered, it is important that the approach chosen builds skills through a continuous process of capacity development that transfers skills to local actors; \\n Support to local capacity development and community empowerment: Through local capacity development and community empowerment, the UN system should support local ownership of DDR processes and programmes. Since the success of the DDR process depends largely on the reintegration of individuals at the community level, it is im- portant to ensure that capacity development efforts are not restricted to assisting national authorities, but include direct support to communities in areas of reintegration. In particular, international agencies can help to build local capacities for participation in assessment and planning processes, project and financial management, reporting, and evaluation.", + "Paragraph": "UN support to national efforts take place in the following areas (the actual degree of UN engagement should be determined on the basis of the considerations outlined above): \n Political\/Strategic support: In order for the international community to provide political support to the DDR process, it is essential to understand the dynamics of both the conflict and the post-conflict period. By carrying out a stakeholder analysis (as part of a larger conflict assessment process), it will be possible to better understand the dynam- ics among national actors, and to identify DDR supporters and potential spoilers; \n Institutional capacity development: It is important that capacity development strategies are established jointly with national authorities at the start of international involvement in DDR to ensure that the parties themselves take ownership of and responsibility for the success of the process. The UN system should play an important role in supporting the development of national and local capacities for DDR through providing technical assistance, establishing partnership arrangements with national institutions, and pro- viding training and capacity-building to local implementing partners; \n Support for the establishment of legal frameworks: A key area in which international exper- tise can support the development of national capacities is in the drawing up of legal frameworks for DDR and related processes of SSR and weapons management. The UN system should draw on experiences from a range of political and legal systems, and assist national authorities in drafting appropriate legislation and legal instruments; \n Technical assistance for policy and planning: Through the provision of technical assistance, the UN system should provide direct support to the development of national DDR policy and programmes. It is important to ensure, however, that this assistance is provided through partnership or mentoring arrangements that allow for knowledge and skills transfers to national staff, and to avoid situations where international experts take direct responsibility for programme functions within national institutions. When several international institutions are providing technical assistance to national authori- ties, it is important to ensure that this assistance is coordinated and coherent; \n Direct support for implementation and financial management: The UN system may also be called upon, either by Security Council mandate or at the request of national authorities, to provide direct support for the implementation of certain components of a DDR pro- gramme, including the financial management of resources for DDR. A memorandum of understanding should be established between the UN and national authorities that defines the precise area of responsibility for programme delivery, mechanisms for co- ordination with local partners and clear reporting responsibilities; \n Material\/Logistic support: In the post-conflict period, many national institutions lack both material and human resources. The UN system should provide material and logistic support to national DDR institutions and implementing agencies, particularly in the areas of: information and communications technology and equipment; transportation; rehabilitation, design and management of DDR sites, transit centres and other facilities; the establishment of information management and referral systems; and the procurement of basic goods for reinsertion kits, among others (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization and IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration); \n Training programmes for national staff: The UN system should further support capacity development through the provision of training. There are a number of different training methodologies, including the provision of courses or seminars, training of trainers, on- the-job or continuous training, and exchanges with experts from other national DDR institutions. Although shortage of time and money may limit the training options that can be offered, it is important that the approach chosen builds skills through a continuous process of capacity development that transfers skills to local actors; \n Support to local capacity development and community empowerment: Through local capacity development and community empowerment, the UN system should support local ownership of DDR processes and programmes. Since the success of the DDR process depends largely on the reintegration of individuals at the community level, it is im- portant to ensure that capacity development efforts are not restricted to assisting national authorities, but include direct support to communities in areas of reintegration. In particular, international agencies can help to build local capacities for participation in assessment and planning processes, project and financial management, reporting, and evaluation.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -52831,7 +52831,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 953, - "Paragraph": "UN support to national efforts take place in the following areas (the actual degree of UN engagement should be determined on the basis of the considerations outlined above): \\n Political\/Strategic support: In order for the international community to provide political support to the DDR process, it is essential to understand the dynamics of both the conflict and the post-conflict period. By carrying out a stakeholder analysis (as part of a larger conflict assessment process), it will be possible to better understand the dynam- ics among national actors, and to identify DDR supporters and potential spoilers; \\n Institutional capacity development: It is important that capacity development strategies are established jointly with national authorities at the start of international involvement in DDR to ensure that the parties themselves take ownership of and responsibility for the success of the process. The UN system should play an important role in supporting the development of national and local capacities for DDR through providing technical assistance, establishing partnership arrangements with national institutions, and pro- viding training and capacity-building to local implementing partners; \\n Support for the establishment of legal frameworks: A key area in which international exper- tise can support the development of national capacities is in the drawing up of legal frameworks for DDR and related processes of SSR and weapons management. The UN system should draw on experiences from a range of political and legal systems, and assist national authorities in drafting appropriate legislation and legal instruments; \\n Technical assistance for policy and planning: Through the provision of technical assistance, the UN system should provide direct support to the development of national DDR policy and programmes. It is important to ensure, however, that this assistance is provided through partnership or mentoring arrangements that allow for knowledge and skills transfers to national staff, and to avoid situations where international experts take direct responsibility for programme functions within national institutions. When several international institutions are providing technical assistance to national authori- ties, it is important to ensure that this assistance is coordinated and coherent; \\n Direct support for implementation and financial management: The UN system may also be called upon, either by Security Council mandate or at the request of national authorities, to provide direct support for the implementation of certain components of a DDR pro- gramme, including the financial management of resources for DDR. A memorandum of understanding should be established between the UN and national authorities that defines the precise area of responsibility for programme delivery, mechanisms for co- ordination with local partners and clear reporting responsibilities; \\n Material\/Logistic support: In the post-conflict period, many national institutions lack both material and human resources. The UN system should provide material and logistic support to national DDR institutions and implementing agencies, particularly in the areas of: information and communications technology and equipment; transportation; rehabilitation, design and management of DDR sites, transit centres and other facilities; the establishment of information management and referral systems; and the procurement of basic goods for reinsertion kits, among others (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization and IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration); \\n Training programmes for national staff: The UN system should further support capacity development through the provision of training. There are a number of different training methodologies, including the provision of courses or seminars, training of trainers, on- the-job or continuous training, and exchanges with experts from other national DDR institutions. Although shortage of time and money may limit the training options that can be offered, it is important that the approach chosen builds skills through a continuous process of capacity development that transfers skills to local actors; \\n Support to local capacity development and community empowerment: Through local capacity development and community empowerment, the UN system should support local ownership of DDR processes and programmes. Since the success of the DDR process depends largely on the reintegration of individuals at the community level, it is im- portant to ensure that capacity development efforts are not restricted to assisting national authorities, but include direct support to communities in areas of reintegration. In particular, international agencies can help to build local capacities for participation in assessment and planning processes, project and financial management, reporting, and evaluation.", + "Paragraph": "UN support to national efforts take place in the following areas (the actual degree of UN engagement should be determined on the basis of the considerations outlined above): \n Political\/Strategic support: In order for the international community to provide political support to the DDR process, it is essential to understand the dynamics of both the conflict and the post-conflict period. By carrying out a stakeholder analysis (as part of a larger conflict assessment process), it will be possible to better understand the dynam- ics among national actors, and to identify DDR supporters and potential spoilers; \n Institutional capacity development: It is important that capacity development strategies are established jointly with national authorities at the start of international involvement in DDR to ensure that the parties themselves take ownership of and responsibility for the success of the process. The UN system should play an important role in supporting the development of national and local capacities for DDR through providing technical assistance, establishing partnership arrangements with national institutions, and pro- viding training and capacity-building to local implementing partners; \n Support for the establishment of legal frameworks: A key area in which international exper- tise can support the development of national capacities is in the drawing up of legal frameworks for DDR and related processes of SSR and weapons management. The UN system should draw on experiences from a range of political and legal systems, and assist national authorities in drafting appropriate legislation and legal instruments; \n Technical assistance for policy and planning: Through the provision of technical assistance, the UN system should provide direct support to the development of national DDR policy and programmes. It is important to ensure, however, that this assistance is provided through partnership or mentoring arrangements that allow for knowledge and skills transfers to national staff, and to avoid situations where international experts take direct responsibility for programme functions within national institutions. When several international institutions are providing technical assistance to national authori- ties, it is important to ensure that this assistance is coordinated and coherent; \n Direct support for implementation and financial management: The UN system may also be called upon, either by Security Council mandate or at the request of national authorities, to provide direct support for the implementation of certain components of a DDR pro- gramme, including the financial management of resources for DDR. A memorandum of understanding should be established between the UN and national authorities that defines the precise area of responsibility for programme delivery, mechanisms for co- ordination with local partners and clear reporting responsibilities; \n Material\/Logistic support: In the post-conflict period, many national institutions lack both material and human resources. The UN system should provide material and logistic support to national DDR institutions and implementing agencies, particularly in the areas of: information and communications technology and equipment; transportation; rehabilitation, design and management of DDR sites, transit centres and other facilities; the establishment of information management and referral systems; and the procurement of basic goods for reinsertion kits, among others (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization and IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration); \n Training programmes for national staff: The UN system should further support capacity development through the provision of training. There are a number of different training methodologies, including the provision of courses or seminars, training of trainers, on- the-job or continuous training, and exchanges with experts from other national DDR institutions. Although shortage of time and money may limit the training options that can be offered, it is important that the approach chosen builds skills through a continuous process of capacity development that transfers skills to local actors; \n Support to local capacity development and community empowerment: Through local capacity development and community empowerment, the UN system should support local ownership of DDR processes and programmes. Since the success of the DDR process depends largely on the reintegration of individuals at the community level, it is im- portant to ensure that capacity development efforts are not restricted to assisting national authorities, but include direct support to communities in areas of reintegration. In particular, international agencies can help to build local capacities for participation in assessment and planning processes, project and financial management, reporting, and evaluation.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -52842,14 +52842,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.2. Areas of UN support", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "When several international institutions are providing technical assistance to national authori- ties, it is important to ensure that this assistance is coordinated and coherent; \\n Direct support for implementation and financial management: The UN system may also be called upon, either by Security Council mandate or at the request of national authorities, to provide direct support for the implementation of certain components of a DDR pro- gramme, including the financial management of resources for DDR.", + "Sentence": "When several international institutions are providing technical assistance to national authori- ties, it is important to ensure that this assistance is coordinated and coherent; \n Direct support for implementation and financial management: The UN system may also be called upon, either by Security Council mandate or at the request of national authorities, to provide direct support for the implementation of certain components of a DDR pro- gramme, including the financial management of resources for DDR.", "newParagraph": "un support national effort take place following area actual degree un engagement determined basis consideration outlined n politicalstrategic support order international community provide political support ddr process essential understand dynamic conflict postconflict period carrying stakeholder analysis part larger conflict assessment process possible better understand dynam ic among national actor identify ddr supporter potential spoiler n institutional capacity development important capacity development strategy established jointly national authority start international involvement ddr ensure party take ownership responsibility success process un system play important role supporting development national local capacity ddr providing technical assistance establishing partnership arrangement national institution pro viding training capacitybuilding local implementing partner n support establishment legal framework key area international exper tise support development national capacity drawing legal framework ddr related process ssr weapon management un system draw experience range political legal system assist national authority drafting appropriate legislation legal instrument n technical assistance policy planning provision technical assistance un system provide direct support development national ddr policy programme important ensure however assistance provided partnership mentoring arrangement allow knowledge skill transfer national staff avoid situation international expert take direct responsibility programme function within national institution several international institution providing technical assistance national authori tie important ensure assistance coordinated coherent n direct support implementation financial management un system may also called upon either security council mandate request national authority provide direct support implementation certain component ddr pro gramme including financial management resource ddr memorandum understanding established un national authority defines precise area responsibility programme delivery mechanism co ordination local partner clear reporting responsibility n materiallogistic support postconflict period many national institution lack material human resource un system provide material logistic support national ddr institution implementing agency particularly area information communication technology equipment transportation rehabilitation design management ddr site transit centre facility establishment information management referral system procurement basic good reinsertion kit among others also see iddrs 410 disarmament iddrs 420 demobilization iddrs 430 social economic reintegration n training programme national staff un system support capacity development provision training number different training methodology including provision course seminar training trainer thejob continuous training exchange expert national ddr institution although shortage time money may limit training option offered important approach chosen build skill continuous process capacity development transfer skill local actor n support local capacity development community empowerment local capacity development community empowerment un system support local ownership ddr process programme since success ddr process depends largely reintegration individual community level im portant ensure capacity development effort restricted assisting national authority include direct support community area reintegration particular international agency help build local capacity participation assessment planning process project financial management reporting evaluation", "ProcessedSent": "several international institution providing technical assistance national authori tie important ensure assistance coordinated coherent n direct support implementation financial management un system may also called upon either security council mandate request national authority provide direct support implementation certain component ddr pro gramme including financial management resource ddr", "SentID": 2935 }, { "ParagraphID": 953, - "Paragraph": "UN support to national efforts take place in the following areas (the actual degree of UN engagement should be determined on the basis of the considerations outlined above): \\n Political\/Strategic support: In order for the international community to provide political support to the DDR process, it is essential to understand the dynamics of both the conflict and the post-conflict period. By carrying out a stakeholder analysis (as part of a larger conflict assessment process), it will be possible to better understand the dynam- ics among national actors, and to identify DDR supporters and potential spoilers; \\n Institutional capacity development: It is important that capacity development strategies are established jointly with national authorities at the start of international involvement in DDR to ensure that the parties themselves take ownership of and responsibility for the success of the process. The UN system should play an important role in supporting the development of national and local capacities for DDR through providing technical assistance, establishing partnership arrangements with national institutions, and pro- viding training and capacity-building to local implementing partners; \\n Support for the establishment of legal frameworks: A key area in which international exper- tise can support the development of national capacities is in the drawing up of legal frameworks for DDR and related processes of SSR and weapons management. The UN system should draw on experiences from a range of political and legal systems, and assist national authorities in drafting appropriate legislation and legal instruments; \\n Technical assistance for policy and planning: Through the provision of technical assistance, the UN system should provide direct support to the development of national DDR policy and programmes. It is important to ensure, however, that this assistance is provided through partnership or mentoring arrangements that allow for knowledge and skills transfers to national staff, and to avoid situations where international experts take direct responsibility for programme functions within national institutions. When several international institutions are providing technical assistance to national authori- ties, it is important to ensure that this assistance is coordinated and coherent; \\n Direct support for implementation and financial management: The UN system may also be called upon, either by Security Council mandate or at the request of national authorities, to provide direct support for the implementation of certain components of a DDR pro- gramme, including the financial management of resources for DDR. A memorandum of understanding should be established between the UN and national authorities that defines the precise area of responsibility for programme delivery, mechanisms for co- ordination with local partners and clear reporting responsibilities; \\n Material\/Logistic support: In the post-conflict period, many national institutions lack both material and human resources. The UN system should provide material and logistic support to national DDR institutions and implementing agencies, particularly in the areas of: information and communications technology and equipment; transportation; rehabilitation, design and management of DDR sites, transit centres and other facilities; the establishment of information management and referral systems; and the procurement of basic goods for reinsertion kits, among others (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization and IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration); \\n Training programmes for national staff: The UN system should further support capacity development through the provision of training. There are a number of different training methodologies, including the provision of courses or seminars, training of trainers, on- the-job or continuous training, and exchanges with experts from other national DDR institutions. Although shortage of time and money may limit the training options that can be offered, it is important that the approach chosen builds skills through a continuous process of capacity development that transfers skills to local actors; \\n Support to local capacity development and community empowerment: Through local capacity development and community empowerment, the UN system should support local ownership of DDR processes and programmes. Since the success of the DDR process depends largely on the reintegration of individuals at the community level, it is im- portant to ensure that capacity development efforts are not restricted to assisting national authorities, but include direct support to communities in areas of reintegration. In particular, international agencies can help to build local capacities for participation in assessment and planning processes, project and financial management, reporting, and evaluation.", + "Paragraph": "UN support to national efforts take place in the following areas (the actual degree of UN engagement should be determined on the basis of the considerations outlined above): \n Political\/Strategic support: In order for the international community to provide political support to the DDR process, it is essential to understand the dynamics of both the conflict and the post-conflict period. By carrying out a stakeholder analysis (as part of a larger conflict assessment process), it will be possible to better understand the dynam- ics among national actors, and to identify DDR supporters and potential spoilers; \n Institutional capacity development: It is important that capacity development strategies are established jointly with national authorities at the start of international involvement in DDR to ensure that the parties themselves take ownership of and responsibility for the success of the process. The UN system should play an important role in supporting the development of national and local capacities for DDR through providing technical assistance, establishing partnership arrangements with national institutions, and pro- viding training and capacity-building to local implementing partners; \n Support for the establishment of legal frameworks: A key area in which international exper- tise can support the development of national capacities is in the drawing up of legal frameworks for DDR and related processes of SSR and weapons management. The UN system should draw on experiences from a range of political and legal systems, and assist national authorities in drafting appropriate legislation and legal instruments; \n Technical assistance for policy and planning: Through the provision of technical assistance, the UN system should provide direct support to the development of national DDR policy and programmes. It is important to ensure, however, that this assistance is provided through partnership or mentoring arrangements that allow for knowledge and skills transfers to national staff, and to avoid situations where international experts take direct responsibility for programme functions within national institutions. When several international institutions are providing technical assistance to national authori- ties, it is important to ensure that this assistance is coordinated and coherent; \n Direct support for implementation and financial management: The UN system may also be called upon, either by Security Council mandate or at the request of national authorities, to provide direct support for the implementation of certain components of a DDR pro- gramme, including the financial management of resources for DDR. A memorandum of understanding should be established between the UN and national authorities that defines the precise area of responsibility for programme delivery, mechanisms for co- ordination with local partners and clear reporting responsibilities; \n Material\/Logistic support: In the post-conflict period, many national institutions lack both material and human resources. The UN system should provide material and logistic support to national DDR institutions and implementing agencies, particularly in the areas of: information and communications technology and equipment; transportation; rehabilitation, design and management of DDR sites, transit centres and other facilities; the establishment of information management and referral systems; and the procurement of basic goods for reinsertion kits, among others (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization and IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration); \n Training programmes for national staff: The UN system should further support capacity development through the provision of training. There are a number of different training methodologies, including the provision of courses or seminars, training of trainers, on- the-job or continuous training, and exchanges with experts from other national DDR institutions. Although shortage of time and money may limit the training options that can be offered, it is important that the approach chosen builds skills through a continuous process of capacity development that transfers skills to local actors; \n Support to local capacity development and community empowerment: Through local capacity development and community empowerment, the UN system should support local ownership of DDR processes and programmes. Since the success of the DDR process depends largely on the reintegration of individuals at the community level, it is im- portant to ensure that capacity development efforts are not restricted to assisting national authorities, but include direct support to communities in areas of reintegration. In particular, international agencies can help to build local capacities for participation in assessment and planning processes, project and financial management, reporting, and evaluation.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -52860,14 +52860,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.2. Areas of UN support", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "A memorandum of understanding should be established between the UN and national authorities that defines the precise area of responsibility for programme delivery, mechanisms for co- ordination with local partners and clear reporting responsibilities; \\n Material\/Logistic support: In the post-conflict period, many national institutions lack both material and human resources.", + "Sentence": "A memorandum of understanding should be established between the UN and national authorities that defines the precise area of responsibility for programme delivery, mechanisms for co- ordination with local partners and clear reporting responsibilities; \n Material\/Logistic support: In the post-conflict period, many national institutions lack both material and human resources.", "newParagraph": "un support national effort take place following area actual degree un engagement determined basis consideration outlined n politicalstrategic support order international community provide political support ddr process essential understand dynamic conflict postconflict period carrying stakeholder analysis part larger conflict assessment process possible better understand dynam ic among national actor identify ddr supporter potential spoiler n institutional capacity development important capacity development strategy established jointly national authority start international involvement ddr ensure party take ownership responsibility success process un system play important role supporting development national local capacity ddr providing technical assistance establishing partnership arrangement national institution pro viding training capacitybuilding local implementing partner n support establishment legal framework key area international exper tise support development national capacity drawing legal framework ddr related process ssr weapon management un system draw experience range political legal system assist national authority drafting appropriate legislation legal instrument n technical assistance policy planning provision technical assistance un system provide direct support development national ddr policy programme important ensure however assistance provided partnership mentoring arrangement allow knowledge skill transfer national staff avoid situation international expert take direct responsibility programme function within national institution several international institution providing technical assistance national authori tie important ensure assistance coordinated coherent n direct support implementation financial management un system may also called upon either security council mandate request national authority provide direct support implementation certain component ddr pro gramme including financial management resource ddr memorandum understanding established un national authority defines precise area responsibility programme delivery mechanism co ordination local partner clear reporting responsibility n materiallogistic support postconflict period many national institution lack material human resource un system provide material logistic support national ddr institution implementing agency particularly area information communication technology equipment transportation rehabilitation design management ddr site transit centre facility establishment information management referral system procurement basic good reinsertion kit among others also see iddrs 410 disarmament iddrs 420 demobilization iddrs 430 social economic reintegration n training programme national staff un system support capacity development provision training number different training methodology including provision course seminar training trainer thejob continuous training exchange expert national ddr institution although shortage time money may limit training option offered important approach chosen build skill continuous process capacity development transfer skill local actor n support local capacity development community empowerment local capacity development community empowerment un system support local ownership ddr process programme since success ddr process depends largely reintegration individual community level im portant ensure capacity development effort restricted assisting national authority include direct support community area reintegration particular international agency help build local capacity participation assessment planning process project financial management reporting evaluation", "ProcessedSent": "memorandum understanding established un national authority defines precise area responsibility programme delivery mechanism co ordination local partner clear reporting responsibility n materiallogistic support postconflict period many national institution lack material human resource", "SentID": 2936 }, { "ParagraphID": 953, - "Paragraph": "UN support to national efforts take place in the following areas (the actual degree of UN engagement should be determined on the basis of the considerations outlined above): \\n Political\/Strategic support: In order for the international community to provide political support to the DDR process, it is essential to understand the dynamics of both the conflict and the post-conflict period. By carrying out a stakeholder analysis (as part of a larger conflict assessment process), it will be possible to better understand the dynam- ics among national actors, and to identify DDR supporters and potential spoilers; \\n Institutional capacity development: It is important that capacity development strategies are established jointly with national authorities at the start of international involvement in DDR to ensure that the parties themselves take ownership of and responsibility for the success of the process. The UN system should play an important role in supporting the development of national and local capacities for DDR through providing technical assistance, establishing partnership arrangements with national institutions, and pro- viding training and capacity-building to local implementing partners; \\n Support for the establishment of legal frameworks: A key area in which international exper- tise can support the development of national capacities is in the drawing up of legal frameworks for DDR and related processes of SSR and weapons management. The UN system should draw on experiences from a range of political and legal systems, and assist national authorities in drafting appropriate legislation and legal instruments; \\n Technical assistance for policy and planning: Through the provision of technical assistance, the UN system should provide direct support to the development of national DDR policy and programmes. It is important to ensure, however, that this assistance is provided through partnership or mentoring arrangements that allow for knowledge and skills transfers to national staff, and to avoid situations where international experts take direct responsibility for programme functions within national institutions. When several international institutions are providing technical assistance to national authori- ties, it is important to ensure that this assistance is coordinated and coherent; \\n Direct support for implementation and financial management: The UN system may also be called upon, either by Security Council mandate or at the request of national authorities, to provide direct support for the implementation of certain components of a DDR pro- gramme, including the financial management of resources for DDR. A memorandum of understanding should be established between the UN and national authorities that defines the precise area of responsibility for programme delivery, mechanisms for co- ordination with local partners and clear reporting responsibilities; \\n Material\/Logistic support: In the post-conflict period, many national institutions lack both material and human resources. The UN system should provide material and logistic support to national DDR institutions and implementing agencies, particularly in the areas of: information and communications technology and equipment; transportation; rehabilitation, design and management of DDR sites, transit centres and other facilities; the establishment of information management and referral systems; and the procurement of basic goods for reinsertion kits, among others (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization and IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration); \\n Training programmes for national staff: The UN system should further support capacity development through the provision of training. There are a number of different training methodologies, including the provision of courses or seminars, training of trainers, on- the-job or continuous training, and exchanges with experts from other national DDR institutions. Although shortage of time and money may limit the training options that can be offered, it is important that the approach chosen builds skills through a continuous process of capacity development that transfers skills to local actors; \\n Support to local capacity development and community empowerment: Through local capacity development and community empowerment, the UN system should support local ownership of DDR processes and programmes. Since the success of the DDR process depends largely on the reintegration of individuals at the community level, it is im- portant to ensure that capacity development efforts are not restricted to assisting national authorities, but include direct support to communities in areas of reintegration. In particular, international agencies can help to build local capacities for participation in assessment and planning processes, project and financial management, reporting, and evaluation.", + "Paragraph": "UN support to national efforts take place in the following areas (the actual degree of UN engagement should be determined on the basis of the considerations outlined above): \n Political\/Strategic support: In order for the international community to provide political support to the DDR process, it is essential to understand the dynamics of both the conflict and the post-conflict period. By carrying out a stakeholder analysis (as part of a larger conflict assessment process), it will be possible to better understand the dynam- ics among national actors, and to identify DDR supporters and potential spoilers; \n Institutional capacity development: It is important that capacity development strategies are established jointly with national authorities at the start of international involvement in DDR to ensure that the parties themselves take ownership of and responsibility for the success of the process. The UN system should play an important role in supporting the development of national and local capacities for DDR through providing technical assistance, establishing partnership arrangements with national institutions, and pro- viding training and capacity-building to local implementing partners; \n Support for the establishment of legal frameworks: A key area in which international exper- tise can support the development of national capacities is in the drawing up of legal frameworks for DDR and related processes of SSR and weapons management. The UN system should draw on experiences from a range of political and legal systems, and assist national authorities in drafting appropriate legislation and legal instruments; \n Technical assistance for policy and planning: Through the provision of technical assistance, the UN system should provide direct support to the development of national DDR policy and programmes. It is important to ensure, however, that this assistance is provided through partnership or mentoring arrangements that allow for knowledge and skills transfers to national staff, and to avoid situations where international experts take direct responsibility for programme functions within national institutions. When several international institutions are providing technical assistance to national authori- ties, it is important to ensure that this assistance is coordinated and coherent; \n Direct support for implementation and financial management: The UN system may also be called upon, either by Security Council mandate or at the request of national authorities, to provide direct support for the implementation of certain components of a DDR pro- gramme, including the financial management of resources for DDR. A memorandum of understanding should be established between the UN and national authorities that defines the precise area of responsibility for programme delivery, mechanisms for co- ordination with local partners and clear reporting responsibilities; \n Material\/Logistic support: In the post-conflict period, many national institutions lack both material and human resources. The UN system should provide material and logistic support to national DDR institutions and implementing agencies, particularly in the areas of: information and communications technology and equipment; transportation; rehabilitation, design and management of DDR sites, transit centres and other facilities; the establishment of information management and referral systems; and the procurement of basic goods for reinsertion kits, among others (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization and IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration); \n Training programmes for national staff: The UN system should further support capacity development through the provision of training. There are a number of different training methodologies, including the provision of courses or seminars, training of trainers, on- the-job or continuous training, and exchanges with experts from other national DDR institutions. Although shortage of time and money may limit the training options that can be offered, it is important that the approach chosen builds skills through a continuous process of capacity development that transfers skills to local actors; \n Support to local capacity development and community empowerment: Through local capacity development and community empowerment, the UN system should support local ownership of DDR processes and programmes. Since the success of the DDR process depends largely on the reintegration of individuals at the community level, it is im- portant to ensure that capacity development efforts are not restricted to assisting national authorities, but include direct support to communities in areas of reintegration. In particular, international agencies can help to build local capacities for participation in assessment and planning processes, project and financial management, reporting, and evaluation.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -52878,14 +52878,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.2. Areas of UN support", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The UN system should provide material and logistic support to national DDR institutions and implementing agencies, particularly in the areas of: information and communications technology and equipment; transportation; rehabilitation, design and management of DDR sites, transit centres and other facilities; the establishment of information management and referral systems; and the procurement of basic goods for reinsertion kits, among others (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization and IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration); \\n Training programmes for national staff: The UN system should further support capacity development through the provision of training.", + "Sentence": "The UN system should provide material and logistic support to national DDR institutions and implementing agencies, particularly in the areas of: information and communications technology and equipment; transportation; rehabilitation, design and management of DDR sites, transit centres and other facilities; the establishment of information management and referral systems; and the procurement of basic goods for reinsertion kits, among others (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization and IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration); \n Training programmes for national staff: The UN system should further support capacity development through the provision of training.", "newParagraph": "un support national effort take place following area actual degree un engagement determined basis consideration outlined n politicalstrategic support order international community provide political support ddr process essential understand dynamic conflict postconflict period carrying stakeholder analysis part larger conflict assessment process possible better understand dynam ic among national actor identify ddr supporter potential spoiler n institutional capacity development important capacity development strategy established jointly national authority start international involvement ddr ensure party take ownership responsibility success process un system play important role supporting development national local capacity ddr providing technical assistance establishing partnership arrangement national institution pro viding training capacitybuilding local implementing partner n support establishment legal framework key area international exper tise support development national capacity drawing legal framework ddr related process ssr weapon management un system draw experience range political legal system assist national authority drafting appropriate legislation legal instrument n technical assistance policy planning provision technical assistance un system provide direct support development national ddr policy programme important ensure however assistance provided partnership mentoring arrangement allow knowledge skill transfer national staff avoid situation international expert take direct responsibility programme function within national institution several international institution providing technical assistance national authori tie important ensure assistance coordinated coherent n direct support implementation financial management un system may also called upon either security council mandate request national authority provide direct support implementation certain component ddr pro gramme including financial management resource ddr memorandum understanding established un national authority defines precise area responsibility programme delivery mechanism co ordination local partner clear reporting responsibility n materiallogistic support postconflict period many national institution lack material human resource un system provide material logistic support national ddr institution implementing agency particularly area information communication technology equipment transportation rehabilitation design management ddr site transit centre facility establishment information management referral system procurement basic good reinsertion kit among others also see iddrs 410 disarmament iddrs 420 demobilization iddrs 430 social economic reintegration n training programme national staff un system support capacity development provision training number different training methodology including provision course seminar training trainer thejob continuous training exchange expert national ddr institution although shortage time money may limit training option offered important approach chosen build skill continuous process capacity development transfer skill local actor n support local capacity development community empowerment local capacity development community empowerment un system support local ownership ddr process programme since success ddr process depends largely reintegration individual community level im portant ensure capacity development effort restricted assisting national authority include direct support community area reintegration particular international agency help build local capacity participation assessment planning process project financial management reporting evaluation", "ProcessedSent": "un system provide material logistic support national ddr institution implementing agency particularly area information communication technology equipment transportation rehabilitation design management ddr site transit centre facility establishment information management referral system procurement basic good reinsertion kit among others also see iddrs 410 disarmament iddrs 420 demobilization iddrs 430 social economic reintegration n training programme national staff un system support capacity development provision training", "SentID": 2937 }, { "ParagraphID": 953, - "Paragraph": "UN support to national efforts take place in the following areas (the actual degree of UN engagement should be determined on the basis of the considerations outlined above): \\n Political\/Strategic support: In order for the international community to provide political support to the DDR process, it is essential to understand the dynamics of both the conflict and the post-conflict period. By carrying out a stakeholder analysis (as part of a larger conflict assessment process), it will be possible to better understand the dynam- ics among national actors, and to identify DDR supporters and potential spoilers; \\n Institutional capacity development: It is important that capacity development strategies are established jointly with national authorities at the start of international involvement in DDR to ensure that the parties themselves take ownership of and responsibility for the success of the process. The UN system should play an important role in supporting the development of national and local capacities for DDR through providing technical assistance, establishing partnership arrangements with national institutions, and pro- viding training and capacity-building to local implementing partners; \\n Support for the establishment of legal frameworks: A key area in which international exper- tise can support the development of national capacities is in the drawing up of legal frameworks for DDR and related processes of SSR and weapons management. The UN system should draw on experiences from a range of political and legal systems, and assist national authorities in drafting appropriate legislation and legal instruments; \\n Technical assistance for policy and planning: Through the provision of technical assistance, the UN system should provide direct support to the development of national DDR policy and programmes. It is important to ensure, however, that this assistance is provided through partnership or mentoring arrangements that allow for knowledge and skills transfers to national staff, and to avoid situations where international experts take direct responsibility for programme functions within national institutions. When several international institutions are providing technical assistance to national authori- ties, it is important to ensure that this assistance is coordinated and coherent; \\n Direct support for implementation and financial management: The UN system may also be called upon, either by Security Council mandate or at the request of national authorities, to provide direct support for the implementation of certain components of a DDR pro- gramme, including the financial management of resources for DDR. A memorandum of understanding should be established between the UN and national authorities that defines the precise area of responsibility for programme delivery, mechanisms for co- ordination with local partners and clear reporting responsibilities; \\n Material\/Logistic support: In the post-conflict period, many national institutions lack both material and human resources. The UN system should provide material and logistic support to national DDR institutions and implementing agencies, particularly in the areas of: information and communications technology and equipment; transportation; rehabilitation, design and management of DDR sites, transit centres and other facilities; the establishment of information management and referral systems; and the procurement of basic goods for reinsertion kits, among others (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization and IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration); \\n Training programmes for national staff: The UN system should further support capacity development through the provision of training. There are a number of different training methodologies, including the provision of courses or seminars, training of trainers, on- the-job or continuous training, and exchanges with experts from other national DDR institutions. Although shortage of time and money may limit the training options that can be offered, it is important that the approach chosen builds skills through a continuous process of capacity development that transfers skills to local actors; \\n Support to local capacity development and community empowerment: Through local capacity development and community empowerment, the UN system should support local ownership of DDR processes and programmes. Since the success of the DDR process depends largely on the reintegration of individuals at the community level, it is im- portant to ensure that capacity development efforts are not restricted to assisting national authorities, but include direct support to communities in areas of reintegration. In particular, international agencies can help to build local capacities for participation in assessment and planning processes, project and financial management, reporting, and evaluation.", + "Paragraph": "UN support to national efforts take place in the following areas (the actual degree of UN engagement should be determined on the basis of the considerations outlined above): \n Political\/Strategic support: In order for the international community to provide political support to the DDR process, it is essential to understand the dynamics of both the conflict and the post-conflict period. By carrying out a stakeholder analysis (as part of a larger conflict assessment process), it will be possible to better understand the dynam- ics among national actors, and to identify DDR supporters and potential spoilers; \n Institutional capacity development: It is important that capacity development strategies are established jointly with national authorities at the start of international involvement in DDR to ensure that the parties themselves take ownership of and responsibility for the success of the process. The UN system should play an important role in supporting the development of national and local capacities for DDR through providing technical assistance, establishing partnership arrangements with national institutions, and pro- viding training and capacity-building to local implementing partners; \n Support for the establishment of legal frameworks: A key area in which international exper- tise can support the development of national capacities is in the drawing up of legal frameworks for DDR and related processes of SSR and weapons management. The UN system should draw on experiences from a range of political and legal systems, and assist national authorities in drafting appropriate legislation and legal instruments; \n Technical assistance for policy and planning: Through the provision of technical assistance, the UN system should provide direct support to the development of national DDR policy and programmes. It is important to ensure, however, that this assistance is provided through partnership or mentoring arrangements that allow for knowledge and skills transfers to national staff, and to avoid situations where international experts take direct responsibility for programme functions within national institutions. When several international institutions are providing technical assistance to national authori- ties, it is important to ensure that this assistance is coordinated and coherent; \n Direct support for implementation and financial management: The UN system may also be called upon, either by Security Council mandate or at the request of national authorities, to provide direct support for the implementation of certain components of a DDR pro- gramme, including the financial management of resources for DDR. A memorandum of understanding should be established between the UN and national authorities that defines the precise area of responsibility for programme delivery, mechanisms for co- ordination with local partners and clear reporting responsibilities; \n Material\/Logistic support: In the post-conflict period, many national institutions lack both material and human resources. The UN system should provide material and logistic support to national DDR institutions and implementing agencies, particularly in the areas of: information and communications technology and equipment; transportation; rehabilitation, design and management of DDR sites, transit centres and other facilities; the establishment of information management and referral systems; and the procurement of basic goods for reinsertion kits, among others (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization and IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration); \n Training programmes for national staff: The UN system should further support capacity development through the provision of training. There are a number of different training methodologies, including the provision of courses or seminars, training of trainers, on- the-job or continuous training, and exchanges with experts from other national DDR institutions. Although shortage of time and money may limit the training options that can be offered, it is important that the approach chosen builds skills through a continuous process of capacity development that transfers skills to local actors; \n Support to local capacity development and community empowerment: Through local capacity development and community empowerment, the UN system should support local ownership of DDR processes and programmes. Since the success of the DDR process depends largely on the reintegration of individuals at the community level, it is im- portant to ensure that capacity development efforts are not restricted to assisting national authorities, but include direct support to communities in areas of reintegration. In particular, international agencies can help to build local capacities for participation in assessment and planning processes, project and financial management, reporting, and evaluation.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -52903,7 +52903,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 953, - "Paragraph": "UN support to national efforts take place in the following areas (the actual degree of UN engagement should be determined on the basis of the considerations outlined above): \\n Political\/Strategic support: In order for the international community to provide political support to the DDR process, it is essential to understand the dynamics of both the conflict and the post-conflict period. By carrying out a stakeholder analysis (as part of a larger conflict assessment process), it will be possible to better understand the dynam- ics among national actors, and to identify DDR supporters and potential spoilers; \\n Institutional capacity development: It is important that capacity development strategies are established jointly with national authorities at the start of international involvement in DDR to ensure that the parties themselves take ownership of and responsibility for the success of the process. The UN system should play an important role in supporting the development of national and local capacities for DDR through providing technical assistance, establishing partnership arrangements with national institutions, and pro- viding training and capacity-building to local implementing partners; \\n Support for the establishment of legal frameworks: A key area in which international exper- tise can support the development of national capacities is in the drawing up of legal frameworks for DDR and related processes of SSR and weapons management. The UN system should draw on experiences from a range of political and legal systems, and assist national authorities in drafting appropriate legislation and legal instruments; \\n Technical assistance for policy and planning: Through the provision of technical assistance, the UN system should provide direct support to the development of national DDR policy and programmes. It is important to ensure, however, that this assistance is provided through partnership or mentoring arrangements that allow for knowledge and skills transfers to national staff, and to avoid situations where international experts take direct responsibility for programme functions within national institutions. When several international institutions are providing technical assistance to national authori- ties, it is important to ensure that this assistance is coordinated and coherent; \\n Direct support for implementation and financial management: The UN system may also be called upon, either by Security Council mandate or at the request of national authorities, to provide direct support for the implementation of certain components of a DDR pro- gramme, including the financial management of resources for DDR. A memorandum of understanding should be established between the UN and national authorities that defines the precise area of responsibility for programme delivery, mechanisms for co- ordination with local partners and clear reporting responsibilities; \\n Material\/Logistic support: In the post-conflict period, many national institutions lack both material and human resources. The UN system should provide material and logistic support to national DDR institutions and implementing agencies, particularly in the areas of: information and communications technology and equipment; transportation; rehabilitation, design and management of DDR sites, transit centres and other facilities; the establishment of information management and referral systems; and the procurement of basic goods for reinsertion kits, among others (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization and IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration); \\n Training programmes for national staff: The UN system should further support capacity development through the provision of training. There are a number of different training methodologies, including the provision of courses or seminars, training of trainers, on- the-job or continuous training, and exchanges with experts from other national DDR institutions. Although shortage of time and money may limit the training options that can be offered, it is important that the approach chosen builds skills through a continuous process of capacity development that transfers skills to local actors; \\n Support to local capacity development and community empowerment: Through local capacity development and community empowerment, the UN system should support local ownership of DDR processes and programmes. Since the success of the DDR process depends largely on the reintegration of individuals at the community level, it is im- portant to ensure that capacity development efforts are not restricted to assisting national authorities, but include direct support to communities in areas of reintegration. In particular, international agencies can help to build local capacities for participation in assessment and planning processes, project and financial management, reporting, and evaluation.", + "Paragraph": "UN support to national efforts take place in the following areas (the actual degree of UN engagement should be determined on the basis of the considerations outlined above): \n Political\/Strategic support: In order for the international community to provide political support to the DDR process, it is essential to understand the dynamics of both the conflict and the post-conflict period. By carrying out a stakeholder analysis (as part of a larger conflict assessment process), it will be possible to better understand the dynam- ics among national actors, and to identify DDR supporters and potential spoilers; \n Institutional capacity development: It is important that capacity development strategies are established jointly with national authorities at the start of international involvement in DDR to ensure that the parties themselves take ownership of and responsibility for the success of the process. The UN system should play an important role in supporting the development of national and local capacities for DDR through providing technical assistance, establishing partnership arrangements with national institutions, and pro- viding training and capacity-building to local implementing partners; \n Support for the establishment of legal frameworks: A key area in which international exper- tise can support the development of national capacities is in the drawing up of legal frameworks for DDR and related processes of SSR and weapons management. The UN system should draw on experiences from a range of political and legal systems, and assist national authorities in drafting appropriate legislation and legal instruments; \n Technical assistance for policy and planning: Through the provision of technical assistance, the UN system should provide direct support to the development of national DDR policy and programmes. It is important to ensure, however, that this assistance is provided through partnership or mentoring arrangements that allow for knowledge and skills transfers to national staff, and to avoid situations where international experts take direct responsibility for programme functions within national institutions. When several international institutions are providing technical assistance to national authori- ties, it is important to ensure that this assistance is coordinated and coherent; \n Direct support for implementation and financial management: The UN system may also be called upon, either by Security Council mandate or at the request of national authorities, to provide direct support for the implementation of certain components of a DDR pro- gramme, including the financial management of resources for DDR. A memorandum of understanding should be established between the UN and national authorities that defines the precise area of responsibility for programme delivery, mechanisms for co- ordination with local partners and clear reporting responsibilities; \n Material\/Logistic support: In the post-conflict period, many national institutions lack both material and human resources. The UN system should provide material and logistic support to national DDR institutions and implementing agencies, particularly in the areas of: information and communications technology and equipment; transportation; rehabilitation, design and management of DDR sites, transit centres and other facilities; the establishment of information management and referral systems; and the procurement of basic goods for reinsertion kits, among others (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization and IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration); \n Training programmes for national staff: The UN system should further support capacity development through the provision of training. There are a number of different training methodologies, including the provision of courses or seminars, training of trainers, on- the-job or continuous training, and exchanges with experts from other national DDR institutions. Although shortage of time and money may limit the training options that can be offered, it is important that the approach chosen builds skills through a continuous process of capacity development that transfers skills to local actors; \n Support to local capacity development and community empowerment: Through local capacity development and community empowerment, the UN system should support local ownership of DDR processes and programmes. Since the success of the DDR process depends largely on the reintegration of individuals at the community level, it is im- portant to ensure that capacity development efforts are not restricted to assisting national authorities, but include direct support to communities in areas of reintegration. In particular, international agencies can help to build local capacities for participation in assessment and planning processes, project and financial management, reporting, and evaluation.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -52914,14 +52914,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.2. Areas of UN support", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Although shortage of time and money may limit the training options that can be offered, it is important that the approach chosen builds skills through a continuous process of capacity development that transfers skills to local actors; \\n Support to local capacity development and community empowerment: Through local capacity development and community empowerment, the UN system should support local ownership of DDR processes and programmes.", + "Sentence": "Although shortage of time and money may limit the training options that can be offered, it is important that the approach chosen builds skills through a continuous process of capacity development that transfers skills to local actors; \n Support to local capacity development and community empowerment: Through local capacity development and community empowerment, the UN system should support local ownership of DDR processes and programmes.", "newParagraph": "un support national effort take place following area actual degree un engagement determined basis consideration outlined n politicalstrategic support order international community provide political support ddr process essential understand dynamic conflict postconflict period carrying stakeholder analysis part larger conflict assessment process possible better understand dynam ic among national actor identify ddr supporter potential spoiler n institutional capacity development important capacity development strategy established jointly national authority start international involvement ddr ensure party take ownership responsibility success process un system play important role supporting development national local capacity ddr providing technical assistance establishing partnership arrangement national institution pro viding training capacitybuilding local implementing partner n support establishment legal framework key area international exper tise support development national capacity drawing legal framework ddr related process ssr weapon management un system draw experience range political legal system assist national authority drafting appropriate legislation legal instrument n technical assistance policy planning provision technical assistance un system provide direct support development national ddr policy programme important ensure however assistance provided partnership mentoring arrangement allow knowledge skill transfer national staff avoid situation international expert take direct responsibility programme function within national institution several international institution providing technical assistance national authori tie important ensure assistance coordinated coherent n direct support implementation financial management un system may also called upon either security council mandate request national authority provide direct support implementation certain component ddr pro gramme including financial management resource ddr memorandum understanding established un national authority defines precise area responsibility programme delivery mechanism co ordination local partner clear reporting responsibility n materiallogistic support postconflict period many national institution lack material human resource un system provide material logistic support national ddr institution implementing agency particularly area information communication technology equipment transportation rehabilitation design management ddr site transit centre facility establishment information management referral system procurement basic good reinsertion kit among others also see iddrs 410 disarmament iddrs 420 demobilization iddrs 430 social economic reintegration n training programme national staff un system support capacity development provision training number different training methodology including provision course seminar training trainer thejob continuous training exchange expert national ddr institution although shortage time money may limit training option offered important approach chosen build skill continuous process capacity development transfer skill local actor n support local capacity development community empowerment local capacity development community empowerment un system support local ownership ddr process programme since success ddr process depends largely reintegration individual community level im portant ensure capacity development effort restricted assisting national authority include direct support community area reintegration particular international agency help build local capacity participation assessment planning process project financial management reporting evaluation", "ProcessedSent": "although shortage time money may limit training option offered important approach chosen build skill continuous process capacity development transfer skill local actor n support local capacity development community empowerment local capacity development community empowerment un system support local ownership ddr process programme", "SentID": 2939 }, { "ParagraphID": 953, - "Paragraph": "UN support to national efforts take place in the following areas (the actual degree of UN engagement should be determined on the basis of the considerations outlined above): \\n Political\/Strategic support: In order for the international community to provide political support to the DDR process, it is essential to understand the dynamics of both the conflict and the post-conflict period. By carrying out a stakeholder analysis (as part of a larger conflict assessment process), it will be possible to better understand the dynam- ics among national actors, and to identify DDR supporters and potential spoilers; \\n Institutional capacity development: It is important that capacity development strategies are established jointly with national authorities at the start of international involvement in DDR to ensure that the parties themselves take ownership of and responsibility for the success of the process. The UN system should play an important role in supporting the development of national and local capacities for DDR through providing technical assistance, establishing partnership arrangements with national institutions, and pro- viding training and capacity-building to local implementing partners; \\n Support for the establishment of legal frameworks: A key area in which international exper- tise can support the development of national capacities is in the drawing up of legal frameworks for DDR and related processes of SSR and weapons management. The UN system should draw on experiences from a range of political and legal systems, and assist national authorities in drafting appropriate legislation and legal instruments; \\n Technical assistance for policy and planning: Through the provision of technical assistance, the UN system should provide direct support to the development of national DDR policy and programmes. It is important to ensure, however, that this assistance is provided through partnership or mentoring arrangements that allow for knowledge and skills transfers to national staff, and to avoid situations where international experts take direct responsibility for programme functions within national institutions. When several international institutions are providing technical assistance to national authori- ties, it is important to ensure that this assistance is coordinated and coherent; \\n Direct support for implementation and financial management: The UN system may also be called upon, either by Security Council mandate or at the request of national authorities, to provide direct support for the implementation of certain components of a DDR pro- gramme, including the financial management of resources for DDR. A memorandum of understanding should be established between the UN and national authorities that defines the precise area of responsibility for programme delivery, mechanisms for co- ordination with local partners and clear reporting responsibilities; \\n Material\/Logistic support: In the post-conflict period, many national institutions lack both material and human resources. The UN system should provide material and logistic support to national DDR institutions and implementing agencies, particularly in the areas of: information and communications technology and equipment; transportation; rehabilitation, design and management of DDR sites, transit centres and other facilities; the establishment of information management and referral systems; and the procurement of basic goods for reinsertion kits, among others (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization and IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration); \\n Training programmes for national staff: The UN system should further support capacity development through the provision of training. There are a number of different training methodologies, including the provision of courses or seminars, training of trainers, on- the-job or continuous training, and exchanges with experts from other national DDR institutions. Although shortage of time and money may limit the training options that can be offered, it is important that the approach chosen builds skills through a continuous process of capacity development that transfers skills to local actors; \\n Support to local capacity development and community empowerment: Through local capacity development and community empowerment, the UN system should support local ownership of DDR processes and programmes. Since the success of the DDR process depends largely on the reintegration of individuals at the community level, it is im- portant to ensure that capacity development efforts are not restricted to assisting national authorities, but include direct support to communities in areas of reintegration. In particular, international agencies can help to build local capacities for participation in assessment and planning processes, project and financial management, reporting, and evaluation.", + "Paragraph": "UN support to national efforts take place in the following areas (the actual degree of UN engagement should be determined on the basis of the considerations outlined above): \n Political\/Strategic support: In order for the international community to provide political support to the DDR process, it is essential to understand the dynamics of both the conflict and the post-conflict period. By carrying out a stakeholder analysis (as part of a larger conflict assessment process), it will be possible to better understand the dynam- ics among national actors, and to identify DDR supporters and potential spoilers; \n Institutional capacity development: It is important that capacity development strategies are established jointly with national authorities at the start of international involvement in DDR to ensure that the parties themselves take ownership of and responsibility for the success of the process. The UN system should play an important role in supporting the development of national and local capacities for DDR through providing technical assistance, establishing partnership arrangements with national institutions, and pro- viding training and capacity-building to local implementing partners; \n Support for the establishment of legal frameworks: A key area in which international exper- tise can support the development of national capacities is in the drawing up of legal frameworks for DDR and related processes of SSR and weapons management. The UN system should draw on experiences from a range of political and legal systems, and assist national authorities in drafting appropriate legislation and legal instruments; \n Technical assistance for policy and planning: Through the provision of technical assistance, the UN system should provide direct support to the development of national DDR policy and programmes. It is important to ensure, however, that this assistance is provided through partnership or mentoring arrangements that allow for knowledge and skills transfers to national staff, and to avoid situations where international experts take direct responsibility for programme functions within national institutions. When several international institutions are providing technical assistance to national authori- ties, it is important to ensure that this assistance is coordinated and coherent; \n Direct support for implementation and financial management: The UN system may also be called upon, either by Security Council mandate or at the request of national authorities, to provide direct support for the implementation of certain components of a DDR pro- gramme, including the financial management of resources for DDR. A memorandum of understanding should be established between the UN and national authorities that defines the precise area of responsibility for programme delivery, mechanisms for co- ordination with local partners and clear reporting responsibilities; \n Material\/Logistic support: In the post-conflict period, many national institutions lack both material and human resources. The UN system should provide material and logistic support to national DDR institutions and implementing agencies, particularly in the areas of: information and communications technology and equipment; transportation; rehabilitation, design and management of DDR sites, transit centres and other facilities; the establishment of information management and referral systems; and the procurement of basic goods for reinsertion kits, among others (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization and IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration); \n Training programmes for national staff: The UN system should further support capacity development through the provision of training. There are a number of different training methodologies, including the provision of courses or seminars, training of trainers, on- the-job or continuous training, and exchanges with experts from other national DDR institutions. Although shortage of time and money may limit the training options that can be offered, it is important that the approach chosen builds skills through a continuous process of capacity development that transfers skills to local actors; \n Support to local capacity development and community empowerment: Through local capacity development and community empowerment, the UN system should support local ownership of DDR processes and programmes. Since the success of the DDR process depends largely on the reintegration of individuals at the community level, it is im- portant to ensure that capacity development efforts are not restricted to assisting national authorities, but include direct support to communities in areas of reintegration. In particular, international agencies can help to build local capacities for participation in assessment and planning processes, project and financial management, reporting, and evaluation.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -52939,7 +52939,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 953, - "Paragraph": "UN support to national efforts take place in the following areas (the actual degree of UN engagement should be determined on the basis of the considerations outlined above): \\n Political\/Strategic support: In order for the international community to provide political support to the DDR process, it is essential to understand the dynamics of both the conflict and the post-conflict period. By carrying out a stakeholder analysis (as part of a larger conflict assessment process), it will be possible to better understand the dynam- ics among national actors, and to identify DDR supporters and potential spoilers; \\n Institutional capacity development: It is important that capacity development strategies are established jointly with national authorities at the start of international involvement in DDR to ensure that the parties themselves take ownership of and responsibility for the success of the process. The UN system should play an important role in supporting the development of national and local capacities for DDR through providing technical assistance, establishing partnership arrangements with national institutions, and pro- viding training and capacity-building to local implementing partners; \\n Support for the establishment of legal frameworks: A key area in which international exper- tise can support the development of national capacities is in the drawing up of legal frameworks for DDR and related processes of SSR and weapons management. The UN system should draw on experiences from a range of political and legal systems, and assist national authorities in drafting appropriate legislation and legal instruments; \\n Technical assistance for policy and planning: Through the provision of technical assistance, the UN system should provide direct support to the development of national DDR policy and programmes. It is important to ensure, however, that this assistance is provided through partnership or mentoring arrangements that allow for knowledge and skills transfers to national staff, and to avoid situations where international experts take direct responsibility for programme functions within national institutions. When several international institutions are providing technical assistance to national authori- ties, it is important to ensure that this assistance is coordinated and coherent; \\n Direct support for implementation and financial management: The UN system may also be called upon, either by Security Council mandate or at the request of national authorities, to provide direct support for the implementation of certain components of a DDR pro- gramme, including the financial management of resources for DDR. A memorandum of understanding should be established between the UN and national authorities that defines the precise area of responsibility for programme delivery, mechanisms for co- ordination with local partners and clear reporting responsibilities; \\n Material\/Logistic support: In the post-conflict period, many national institutions lack both material and human resources. The UN system should provide material and logistic support to national DDR institutions and implementing agencies, particularly in the areas of: information and communications technology and equipment; transportation; rehabilitation, design and management of DDR sites, transit centres and other facilities; the establishment of information management and referral systems; and the procurement of basic goods for reinsertion kits, among others (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization and IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration); \\n Training programmes for national staff: The UN system should further support capacity development through the provision of training. There are a number of different training methodologies, including the provision of courses or seminars, training of trainers, on- the-job or continuous training, and exchanges with experts from other national DDR institutions. Although shortage of time and money may limit the training options that can be offered, it is important that the approach chosen builds skills through a continuous process of capacity development that transfers skills to local actors; \\n Support to local capacity development and community empowerment: Through local capacity development and community empowerment, the UN system should support local ownership of DDR processes and programmes. Since the success of the DDR process depends largely on the reintegration of individuals at the community level, it is im- portant to ensure that capacity development efforts are not restricted to assisting national authorities, but include direct support to communities in areas of reintegration. In particular, international agencies can help to build local capacities for participation in assessment and planning processes, project and financial management, reporting, and evaluation.", + "Paragraph": "UN support to national efforts take place in the following areas (the actual degree of UN engagement should be determined on the basis of the considerations outlined above): \n Political\/Strategic support: In order for the international community to provide political support to the DDR process, it is essential to understand the dynamics of both the conflict and the post-conflict period. By carrying out a stakeholder analysis (as part of a larger conflict assessment process), it will be possible to better understand the dynam- ics among national actors, and to identify DDR supporters and potential spoilers; \n Institutional capacity development: It is important that capacity development strategies are established jointly with national authorities at the start of international involvement in DDR to ensure that the parties themselves take ownership of and responsibility for the success of the process. The UN system should play an important role in supporting the development of national and local capacities for DDR through providing technical assistance, establishing partnership arrangements with national institutions, and pro- viding training and capacity-building to local implementing partners; \n Support for the establishment of legal frameworks: A key area in which international exper- tise can support the development of national capacities is in the drawing up of legal frameworks for DDR and related processes of SSR and weapons management. The UN system should draw on experiences from a range of political and legal systems, and assist national authorities in drafting appropriate legislation and legal instruments; \n Technical assistance for policy and planning: Through the provision of technical assistance, the UN system should provide direct support to the development of national DDR policy and programmes. It is important to ensure, however, that this assistance is provided through partnership or mentoring arrangements that allow for knowledge and skills transfers to national staff, and to avoid situations where international experts take direct responsibility for programme functions within national institutions. When several international institutions are providing technical assistance to national authori- ties, it is important to ensure that this assistance is coordinated and coherent; \n Direct support for implementation and financial management: The UN system may also be called upon, either by Security Council mandate or at the request of national authorities, to provide direct support for the implementation of certain components of a DDR pro- gramme, including the financial management of resources for DDR. A memorandum of understanding should be established between the UN and national authorities that defines the precise area of responsibility for programme delivery, mechanisms for co- ordination with local partners and clear reporting responsibilities; \n Material\/Logistic support: In the post-conflict period, many national institutions lack both material and human resources. The UN system should provide material and logistic support to national DDR institutions and implementing agencies, particularly in the areas of: information and communications technology and equipment; transportation; rehabilitation, design and management of DDR sites, transit centres and other facilities; the establishment of information management and referral systems; and the procurement of basic goods for reinsertion kits, among others (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization and IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration); \n Training programmes for national staff: The UN system should further support capacity development through the provision of training. There are a number of different training methodologies, including the provision of courses or seminars, training of trainers, on- the-job or continuous training, and exchanges with experts from other national DDR institutions. Although shortage of time and money may limit the training options that can be offered, it is important that the approach chosen builds skills through a continuous process of capacity development that transfers skills to local actors; \n Support to local capacity development and community empowerment: Through local capacity development and community empowerment, the UN system should support local ownership of DDR processes and programmes. Since the success of the DDR process depends largely on the reintegration of individuals at the community level, it is im- portant to ensure that capacity development efforts are not restricted to assisting national authorities, but include direct support to communities in areas of reintegration. In particular, international agencies can help to build local capacities for participation in assessment and planning processes, project and financial management, reporting, and evaluation.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -52957,7 +52957,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 954, - "Paragraph": "Prepared by the Draft Interim Secretariat (Comprising UNDP, UNMIL, World Bank, USAID, UNICEF, UNHCR, OCHA, World Vision) \\n Monrovia, 31 October 2003 \\n Excerpts: pp. 17\u201324", + "Paragraph": "Prepared by the Draft Interim Secretariat (Comprising UNDP, UNMIL, World Bank, USAID, UNICEF, UNHCR, OCHA, World Vision) \n Monrovia, 31 October 2003 \n Excerpts: pp. 17\u201324", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -52968,14 +52968,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Prepared by the Draft Interim Secretariat (Comprising UNDP, UNMIL, World Bank, USAID, UNICEF, UNHCR, OCHA, World Vision) \\n Monrovia, 31 October 2003 \\n Excerpts: pp.", + "Sentence": "Prepared by the Draft Interim Secretariat (Comprising UNDP, UNMIL, World Bank, USAID, UNICEF, UNHCR, OCHA, World Vision) \n Monrovia, 31 October 2003 \n Excerpts: pp.", "newParagraph": "prepared draft interim secretariat comprising undp unmil world bank usaid unicef unhcr ocha world vision n monrovia 31 october 2003 n excerpt pp 17 24", "ProcessedSent": "prepared draft interim secretariat comprising undp unmil world bank usaid unicef unhcr ocha world vision n monrovia 31 october 2003 n excerpt pp", "SentID": 2942 }, { "ParagraphID": 954, - "Paragraph": "Prepared by the Draft Interim Secretariat (Comprising UNDP, UNMIL, World Bank, USAID, UNICEF, UNHCR, OCHA, World Vision) \\n Monrovia, 31 October 2003 \\n Excerpts: pp. 17\u201324", + "Paragraph": "Prepared by the Draft Interim Secretariat (Comprising UNDP, UNMIL, World Bank, USAID, UNICEF, UNHCR, OCHA, World Vision) \n Monrovia, 31 October 2003 \n Excerpts: pp. 17\u201324", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -53029,7 +53029,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 956, - "Paragraph": "The NCDDRR will: \\n provide policy guidance to the Joint Implementation Unit (JIU); \\n formulate the strategy and co-ordinate all government institutions in support of the Disarmament, Demobilization, Rehabilitation and Reintegration Programme (DDRRP); \\n identify problems related to programme implementation and impact; and \\n undertake all measures necessary for their quick and effective solution. During start-up, the NCDDRR will hold at least monthly meetings, but extraordinary meetings can be called if necessary.", + "Paragraph": "The NCDDRR will: \n provide policy guidance to the Joint Implementation Unit (JIU); \n formulate the strategy and co-ordinate all government institutions in support of the Disarmament, Demobilization, Rehabilitation and Reintegration Programme (DDRRP); \n identify problems related to programme implementation and impact; and \n undertake all measures necessary for their quick and effective solution. During start-up, the NCDDRR will hold at least monthly meetings, but extraordinary meetings can be called if necessary.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -53040,14 +53040,14 @@ "Heading2": "Implementation modalities", "Heading3": "The national commission", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The NCDDRR will: \\n provide policy guidance to the Joint Implementation Unit (JIU); \\n formulate the strategy and co-ordinate all government institutions in support of the Disarmament, Demobilization, Rehabilitation and Reintegration Programme (DDRRP); \\n identify problems related to programme implementation and impact; and \\n undertake all measures necessary for their quick and effective solution.", + "Sentence": "The NCDDRR will: \n provide policy guidance to the Joint Implementation Unit (JIU); \n formulate the strategy and co-ordinate all government institutions in support of the Disarmament, Demobilization, Rehabilitation and Reintegration Programme (DDRRP); \n identify problems related to programme implementation and impact; and \n undertake all measures necessary for their quick and effective solution.", "newParagraph": "ncddrr n provide policy guidance joint implementation unit jiu n formulate strategy coordinate government institution support disarmament demobilization rehabilitation reintegration programme ddrrp n identify problem related programme implementation impact n undertake measure necessary quick effective solution startup ncddrr hold least monthly meeting extraordinary meeting called necessary", "ProcessedSent": "ncddrr n provide policy guidance joint implementation unit jiu n formulate strategy coordinate government institution support disarmament demobilization rehabilitation reintegration programme ddrrp n identify problem related programme implementation impact n undertake measure necessary quick effective solution", "SentID": 2946 }, { "ParagraphID": 956, - "Paragraph": "The NCDDRR will: \\n provide policy guidance to the Joint Implementation Unit (JIU); \\n formulate the strategy and co-ordinate all government institutions in support of the Disarmament, Demobilization, Rehabilitation and Reintegration Programme (DDRRP); \\n identify problems related to programme implementation and impact; and \\n undertake all measures necessary for their quick and effective solution. During start-up, the NCDDRR will hold at least monthly meetings, but extraordinary meetings can be called if necessary.", + "Paragraph": "The NCDDRR will: \n provide policy guidance to the Joint Implementation Unit (JIU); \n formulate the strategy and co-ordinate all government institutions in support of the Disarmament, Demobilization, Rehabilitation and Reintegration Programme (DDRRP); \n identify problems related to programme implementation and impact; and \n undertake all measures necessary for their quick and effective solution. During start-up, the NCDDRR will hold at least monthly meetings, but extraordinary meetings can be called if necessary.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -53065,7 +53065,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 957, - "Paragraph": "The NCDDRR will be supported by a Secretary, who will be responsible for: \\n reporting to the NCDDRR on the activities of the JIU with regard to the DDRR process; \\n promoting programme activities as well as managing relationships with external key stakeholders; \\n assisting the JIU with necessary support and facilitation required to secure the political commitment of the leadership of the various fighting groups in order to implement the DDRR programme; \\n participating in the various committees of the JIU \u2013 particularly with the Technical Coordination Committee and the Project Approval Committee (PAC); \\n providing general oversight of the DDRR process on behalf of the NCDDRR committee and preparing reports to the committee.", + "Paragraph": "The NCDDRR will be supported by a Secretary, who will be responsible for: \n reporting to the NCDDRR on the activities of the JIU with regard to the DDRR process; \n promoting programme activities as well as managing relationships with external key stakeholders; \n assisting the JIU with necessary support and facilitation required to secure the political commitment of the leadership of the various fighting groups in order to implement the DDRR programme; \n participating in the various committees of the JIU \u2013 particularly with the Technical Coordination Committee and the Project Approval Committee (PAC); \n providing general oversight of the DDRR process on behalf of the NCDDRR committee and preparing reports to the committee.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -53076,14 +53076,14 @@ "Heading2": "Implementation modalities", "Heading3": "The national commission", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The NCDDRR will be supported by a Secretary, who will be responsible for: \\n reporting to the NCDDRR on the activities of the JIU with regard to the DDRR process; \\n promoting programme activities as well as managing relationships with external key stakeholders; \\n assisting the JIU with necessary support and facilitation required to secure the political commitment of the leadership of the various fighting groups in order to implement the DDRR programme; \\n participating in the various committees of the JIU \u2013 particularly with the Technical Coordination Committee and the Project Approval Committee (PAC); \\n providing general oversight of the DDRR process on behalf of the NCDDRR committee and preparing reports to the committee.", + "Sentence": "The NCDDRR will be supported by a Secretary, who will be responsible for: \n reporting to the NCDDRR on the activities of the JIU with regard to the DDRR process; \n promoting programme activities as well as managing relationships with external key stakeholders; \n assisting the JIU with necessary support and facilitation required to secure the political commitment of the leadership of the various fighting groups in order to implement the DDRR programme; \n participating in the various committees of the JIU \u2013 particularly with the Technical Coordination Committee and the Project Approval Committee (PAC); \n providing general oversight of the DDRR process on behalf of the NCDDRR committee and preparing reports to the committee.", "newParagraph": "ncddrr supported secretary responsible n reporting ncddrr activity jiu regard ddrr process n promoting programme activity well managing relationship external key stakeholder n assisting jiu necessary support facilitation required secure political commitment leadership various fighting group order implement ddrr programme n participating various committee jiu particularly technical coordination committee project approval committee pac n providing general oversight ddrr process behalf ncddrr committee preparing report committee", "ProcessedSent": "ncddrr supported secretary responsible n reporting ncddrr activity jiu regard ddrr process n promoting programme activity well managing relationship external key stakeholder n assisting jiu necessary support facilitation required secure political commitment leadership various fighting group order implement ddrr programme n participating various committee jiu particularly technical coordination committee project approval committee pac n providing general oversight ddrr process behalf ncddrr committee preparing report committee", "SentID": 2948 }, { "ParagraphID": 958, - "Paragraph": "In order to ensure rapid implementation that will protect the credibility of the programme, a Joint Implementation Unit (JIU), headed by a Programme and Policy Adviser, will carry out the planning and implementation of the day-to-day operation and execution of the programme. The JIU will be an interdisciplinary and interdepartmental entity composed of four units dealing with: \\n disarmament and demobilization: staffed with expertise from the UNMIL comprising a disarmament and demobilization expert, demobilization officers and field officers, as well as qualified national staff; \\n rehabilitation and reintegration: staffed with expertise from the UNDP and other relevant agencies consisting of reintegration operation experts and national experts in vocational training and small enterprise development, employment creation and appren- ticeship promotion, agriculture and food production; \\n monitoring and evaluation: staffed by technical assistance from the UNDP including a monitoring and evaluation (M&E) expert, and national staff as systems analyst, pro- grammer and M&E field monitors as well as short-term data entry clerks; and \\n information and sensitization: staffed with expertise from UNMIL and OCHA includ- ing specialists in public information development and dissemination, social adaptation programmes in the area of civic education, psychosocial counselling, community-based reconciliation and peace-building measures.", + "Paragraph": "In order to ensure rapid implementation that will protect the credibility of the programme, a Joint Implementation Unit (JIU), headed by a Programme and Policy Adviser, will carry out the planning and implementation of the day-to-day operation and execution of the programme. The JIU will be an interdisciplinary and interdepartmental entity composed of four units dealing with: \n disarmament and demobilization: staffed with expertise from the UNMIL comprising a disarmament and demobilization expert, demobilization officers and field officers, as well as qualified national staff; \n rehabilitation and reintegration: staffed with expertise from the UNDP and other relevant agencies consisting of reintegration operation experts and national experts in vocational training and small enterprise development, employment creation and appren- ticeship promotion, agriculture and food production; \n monitoring and evaluation: staffed by technical assistance from the UNDP including a monitoring and evaluation (M&E) expert, and national staff as systems analyst, pro- grammer and M&E field monitors as well as short-term data entry clerks; and \n information and sensitization: staffed with expertise from UNMIL and OCHA includ- ing specialists in public information development and dissemination, social adaptation programmes in the area of civic education, psychosocial counselling, community-based reconciliation and peace-building measures.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -53101,7 +53101,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 958, - "Paragraph": "In order to ensure rapid implementation that will protect the credibility of the programme, a Joint Implementation Unit (JIU), headed by a Programme and Policy Adviser, will carry out the planning and implementation of the day-to-day operation and execution of the programme. The JIU will be an interdisciplinary and interdepartmental entity composed of four units dealing with: \\n disarmament and demobilization: staffed with expertise from the UNMIL comprising a disarmament and demobilization expert, demobilization officers and field officers, as well as qualified national staff; \\n rehabilitation and reintegration: staffed with expertise from the UNDP and other relevant agencies consisting of reintegration operation experts and national experts in vocational training and small enterprise development, employment creation and appren- ticeship promotion, agriculture and food production; \\n monitoring and evaluation: staffed by technical assistance from the UNDP including a monitoring and evaluation (M&E) expert, and national staff as systems analyst, pro- grammer and M&E field monitors as well as short-term data entry clerks; and \\n information and sensitization: staffed with expertise from UNMIL and OCHA includ- ing specialists in public information development and dissemination, social adaptation programmes in the area of civic education, psychosocial counselling, community-based reconciliation and peace-building measures.", + "Paragraph": "In order to ensure rapid implementation that will protect the credibility of the programme, a Joint Implementation Unit (JIU), headed by a Programme and Policy Adviser, will carry out the planning and implementation of the day-to-day operation and execution of the programme. The JIU will be an interdisciplinary and interdepartmental entity composed of four units dealing with: \n disarmament and demobilization: staffed with expertise from the UNMIL comprising a disarmament and demobilization expert, demobilization officers and field officers, as well as qualified national staff; \n rehabilitation and reintegration: staffed with expertise from the UNDP and other relevant agencies consisting of reintegration operation experts and national experts in vocational training and small enterprise development, employment creation and appren- ticeship promotion, agriculture and food production; \n monitoring and evaluation: staffed by technical assistance from the UNDP including a monitoring and evaluation (M&E) expert, and national staff as systems analyst, pro- grammer and M&E field monitors as well as short-term data entry clerks; and \n information and sensitization: staffed with expertise from UNMIL and OCHA includ- ing specialists in public information development and dissemination, social adaptation programmes in the area of civic education, psychosocial counselling, community-based reconciliation and peace-building measures.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -53112,14 +53112,14 @@ "Heading2": "Joint Implementation Unit", "Heading3": "Function", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The JIU will be an interdisciplinary and interdepartmental entity composed of four units dealing with: \\n disarmament and demobilization: staffed with expertise from the UNMIL comprising a disarmament and demobilization expert, demobilization officers and field officers, as well as qualified national staff; \\n rehabilitation and reintegration: staffed with expertise from the UNDP and other relevant agencies consisting of reintegration operation experts and national experts in vocational training and small enterprise development, employment creation and appren- ticeship promotion, agriculture and food production; \\n monitoring and evaluation: staffed by technical assistance from the UNDP including a monitoring and evaluation (M&E) expert, and national staff as systems analyst, pro- grammer and M&E field monitors as well as short-term data entry clerks; and \\n information and sensitization: staffed with expertise from UNMIL and OCHA includ- ing specialists in public information development and dissemination, social adaptation programmes in the area of civic education, psychosocial counselling, community-based reconciliation and peace-building measures.", + "Sentence": "The JIU will be an interdisciplinary and interdepartmental entity composed of four units dealing with: \n disarmament and demobilization: staffed with expertise from the UNMIL comprising a disarmament and demobilization expert, demobilization officers and field officers, as well as qualified national staff; \n rehabilitation and reintegration: staffed with expertise from the UNDP and other relevant agencies consisting of reintegration operation experts and national experts in vocational training and small enterprise development, employment creation and appren- ticeship promotion, agriculture and food production; \n monitoring and evaluation: staffed by technical assistance from the UNDP including a monitoring and evaluation (M&E) expert, and national staff as systems analyst, pro- grammer and M&E field monitors as well as short-term data entry clerks; and \n information and sensitization: staffed with expertise from UNMIL and OCHA includ- ing specialists in public information development and dissemination, social adaptation programmes in the area of civic education, psychosocial counselling, community-based reconciliation and peace-building measures.", "newParagraph": "order ensure rapid implementation protect credibility programme joint implementation unit jiu headed programme policy adviser carry planning implementation daytoday operation execution programme jiu interdisciplinary interdepartmental entity composed four unit dealing n disarmament demobilization staffed expertise unmil comprising disarmament demobilization expert demobilization officer field officer well qualified national staff n rehabilitation reintegration staffed expertise undp relevant agency consisting reintegration operation expert national expert vocational training small enterprise development employment creation appren ticeship promotion agriculture food production n monitoring evaluation staffed technical assistance undp including monitoring evaluation expert national staff system analyst pro grammer field monitor well shortterm data entry clerk n information sensitization staffed expertise unmil ocha includ ing specialist public information development dissemination social adaptation programme area civic education psychosocial counselling communitybased reconciliation peacebuilding measure", "ProcessedSent": "jiu interdisciplinary interdepartmental entity composed four unit dealing n disarmament demobilization staffed expertise unmil comprising disarmament demobilization expert demobilization officer field officer well qualified national staff n rehabilitation reintegration staffed expertise undp relevant agency consisting reintegration operation expert national expert vocational training small enterprise development employment creation appren ticeship promotion agriculture food production n monitoring evaluation staffed technical assistance undp including monitoring evaluation expert national staff system analyst pro grammer field monitor well shortterm data entry clerk n information sensitization staffed expertise unmil ocha includ ing specialist public information development dissemination social adaptation programme area civic education psychosocial counselling communitybased reconciliation peacebuilding measure", "SentID": 2950 }, { "ParagraphID": 959, - "Paragraph": "Accountable to the NCDDRR, the JIU will be responsible for ensuring: \\n the planning and implementation of the individual programme components in collabo- ration with other government departments, NGOs and donors; \\n the transparent and accountable administration of the programme (including procure- ment and disbursements); and \\n monitoring and evaluation.", + "Paragraph": "Accountable to the NCDDRR, the JIU will be responsible for ensuring: \n the planning and implementation of the individual programme components in collabo- ration with other government departments, NGOs and donors; \n the transparent and accountable administration of the programme (including procure- ment and disbursements); and \n monitoring and evaluation.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -53130,7 +53130,7 @@ "Heading2": "Joint Implementation Unit", "Heading3": "Function", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Accountable to the NCDDRR, the JIU will be responsible for ensuring: \\n the planning and implementation of the individual programme components in collabo- ration with other government departments, NGOs and donors; \\n the transparent and accountable administration of the programme (including procure- ment and disbursements); and \\n monitoring and evaluation.", + "Sentence": "Accountable to the NCDDRR, the JIU will be responsible for ensuring: \n the planning and implementation of the individual programme components in collabo- ration with other government departments, NGOs and donors; \n the transparent and accountable administration of the programme (including procure- ment and disbursements); and \n monitoring and evaluation.", "newParagraph": "accountable ncddrr jiu responsible ensuring n planning implementation individual programme component collabo ration government department ngo donor n transparent accountable administration programme including procure ment disbursement n monitoring evaluation", "ProcessedSent": "accountable ncddrr jiu responsible ensuring n planning implementation individual programme component collabo ration government department ngo donor n transparent accountable administration programme including procure ment disbursement n monitoring evaluation", "SentID": 2951 @@ -53173,7 +53173,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 961, - "Paragraph": "The various units of the JIU will be assigned with expertise from UN agencies as follows: \\n the UNMIL DDR team will be deployed for the DD Unit in the JIU; \\n programme and policy coordination, MIS and reintegration will be assigned to the team from the UNDP; and \\n UNMIL and OCHA will handle the Information and Sensitization Unit.", + "Paragraph": "The various units of the JIU will be assigned with expertise from UN agencies as follows: \n the UNMIL DDR team will be deployed for the DD Unit in the JIU; \n programme and policy coordination, MIS and reintegration will be assigned to the team from the UNDP; and \n UNMIL and OCHA will handle the Information and Sensitization Unit.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -53184,7 +53184,7 @@ "Heading2": "Joint Implementation Unit", "Heading3": "Function", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The various units of the JIU will be assigned with expertise from UN agencies as follows: \\n the UNMIL DDR team will be deployed for the DD Unit in the JIU; \\n programme and policy coordination, MIS and reintegration will be assigned to the team from the UNDP; and \\n UNMIL and OCHA will handle the Information and Sensitization Unit.", + "Sentence": "The various units of the JIU will be assigned with expertise from UN agencies as follows: \n the UNMIL DDR team will be deployed for the DD Unit in the JIU; \n programme and policy coordination, MIS and reintegration will be assigned to the team from the UNDP; and \n UNMIL and OCHA will handle the Information and Sensitization Unit.", "newParagraph": "various unit jiu assigned expertise un agency follows n unmil ddr team deployed dd unit jiu n programme policy coordination mi reintegration assigned team undp n unmil ocha handle information sensitization unit", "ProcessedSent": "various unit jiu assigned expertise un agency follows n unmil ddr team deployed dd unit jiu n programme policy coordination mi reintegration assigned team undp n unmil ocha handle information sensitization unit", "SentID": 2954 @@ -53371,7 +53371,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 968, - "Paragraph": "The field offices will be responsible for: \\n information and counselling; \\n administration of reintegration assistance under the different programme components; \\n monitoring and evaluation; \\n co-ordination with traditional\/religious leaders, and maintaining linkages and coordi- nation with other community-based reconstruction and rehabilitation interventions; \\n sensitizing the local population; \\n assisting in programme implementation; \\n identifying and solving local problems related to ex-combatant reintegration; and \\n reporting on the progress and impact of the programme to the JIU in Monrovia.", + "Paragraph": "The field offices will be responsible for: \n information and counselling; \n administration of reintegration assistance under the different programme components; \n monitoring and evaluation; \n co-ordination with traditional\/religious leaders, and maintaining linkages and coordi- nation with other community-based reconstruction and rehabilitation interventions; \n sensitizing the local population; \n assisting in programme implementation; \n identifying and solving local problems related to ex-combatant reintegration; and \n reporting on the progress and impact of the programme to the JIU in Monrovia.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -53382,7 +53382,7 @@ "Heading2": "Joint Implementation Unit", "Heading3": "DDRR field offices", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The field offices will be responsible for: \\n information and counselling; \\n administration of reintegration assistance under the different programme components; \\n monitoring and evaluation; \\n co-ordination with traditional\/religious leaders, and maintaining linkages and coordi- nation with other community-based reconstruction and rehabilitation interventions; \\n sensitizing the local population; \\n assisting in programme implementation; \\n identifying and solving local problems related to ex-combatant reintegration; and \\n reporting on the progress and impact of the programme to the JIU in Monrovia.", + "Sentence": "The field offices will be responsible for: \n information and counselling; \n administration of reintegration assistance under the different programme components; \n monitoring and evaluation; \n co-ordination with traditional\/religious leaders, and maintaining linkages and coordi- nation with other community-based reconstruction and rehabilitation interventions; \n sensitizing the local population; \n assisting in programme implementation; \n identifying and solving local problems related to ex-combatant reintegration; and \n reporting on the progress and impact of the programme to the JIU in Monrovia.", "newParagraph": "field office responsible n information counselling n administration reintegration assistance different programme component n monitoring evaluation n coordination traditionalreligious leader maintaining linkage coordi nation communitybased reconstruction rehabilitation intervention n sensitizing local population n assisting programme implementation n identifying solving local problem related excombatant reintegration n reporting progress impact programme jiu monrovia", "ProcessedSent": "field office responsible n information counselling n administration reintegration assistance different programme component n monitoring evaluation n coordination traditionalreligious leader maintaining linkage coordi nation communitybased reconstruction rehabilitation intervention n sensitizing local population n assisting programme implementation n identifying solving local problem related excombatant reintegration n reporting progress impact programme jiu monrovia", "SentID": 2965 @@ -53407,7 +53407,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 970, - "Paragraph": "A military liaison office will be created to facilitate co-operation with UNMIL and the DD Unit for all security-related aspects of the programme. Within the overall mandates given to them by their respective institutions, UNMIL is expected to perform the following functions within the DDRR programme: \\n provide relevant input and information as well as security assistance and advice with regard to the selection of potential sites for disarmament and demobilization; \\n provide technical input with regard to the process of disarmament, registration, docu- mentation and screening of potential candidates for demobilization; \\n develop and install systems for arms control and advise on a larger legislative frame- work to monitor and control arms recycling; \\n monitor and verify the conformity of the DDR process according to recognized and acceptable standards; \\n assume responsibility for effecting disarmament of combatants, maintain a pertinent registry of surrendered weaponry and conduct pre-demobilization screening and evaluation; and \\n ensure the destruction of all weapons surrendered.", + "Paragraph": "A military liaison office will be created to facilitate co-operation with UNMIL and the DD Unit for all security-related aspects of the programme. Within the overall mandates given to them by their respective institutions, UNMIL is expected to perform the following functions within the DDRR programme: \n provide relevant input and information as well as security assistance and advice with regard to the selection of potential sites for disarmament and demobilization; \n provide technical input with regard to the process of disarmament, registration, docu- mentation and screening of potential candidates for demobilization; \n develop and install systems for arms control and advise on a larger legislative frame- work to monitor and control arms recycling; \n monitor and verify the conformity of the DDR process according to recognized and acceptable standards; \n assume responsibility for effecting disarmament of combatants, maintain a pertinent registry of surrendered weaponry and conduct pre-demobilization screening and evaluation; and \n ensure the destruction of all weapons surrendered.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -53425,7 +53425,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 970, - "Paragraph": "A military liaison office will be created to facilitate co-operation with UNMIL and the DD Unit for all security-related aspects of the programme. Within the overall mandates given to them by their respective institutions, UNMIL is expected to perform the following functions within the DDRR programme: \\n provide relevant input and information as well as security assistance and advice with regard to the selection of potential sites for disarmament and demobilization; \\n provide technical input with regard to the process of disarmament, registration, docu- mentation and screening of potential candidates for demobilization; \\n develop and install systems for arms control and advise on a larger legislative frame- work to monitor and control arms recycling; \\n monitor and verify the conformity of the DDR process according to recognized and acceptable standards; \\n assume responsibility for effecting disarmament of combatants, maintain a pertinent registry of surrendered weaponry and conduct pre-demobilization screening and evaluation; and \\n ensure the destruction of all weapons surrendered.", + "Paragraph": "A military liaison office will be created to facilitate co-operation with UNMIL and the DD Unit for all security-related aspects of the programme. Within the overall mandates given to them by their respective institutions, UNMIL is expected to perform the following functions within the DDRR programme: \n provide relevant input and information as well as security assistance and advice with regard to the selection of potential sites for disarmament and demobilization; \n provide technical input with regard to the process of disarmament, registration, docu- mentation and screening of potential candidates for demobilization; \n develop and install systems for arms control and advise on a larger legislative frame- work to monitor and control arms recycling; \n monitor and verify the conformity of the DDR process according to recognized and acceptable standards; \n assume responsibility for effecting disarmament of combatants, maintain a pertinent registry of surrendered weaponry and conduct pre-demobilization screening and evaluation; and \n ensure the destruction of all weapons surrendered.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -53436,7 +53436,7 @@ "Heading2": "Joint Implementation Unit", "Heading3": "Roles and functions of the military units", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Within the overall mandates given to them by their respective institutions, UNMIL is expected to perform the following functions within the DDRR programme: \\n provide relevant input and information as well as security assistance and advice with regard to the selection of potential sites for disarmament and demobilization; \\n provide technical input with regard to the process of disarmament, registration, docu- mentation and screening of potential candidates for demobilization; \\n develop and install systems for arms control and advise on a larger legislative frame- work to monitor and control arms recycling; \\n monitor and verify the conformity of the DDR process according to recognized and acceptable standards; \\n assume responsibility for effecting disarmament of combatants, maintain a pertinent registry of surrendered weaponry and conduct pre-demobilization screening and evaluation; and \\n ensure the destruction of all weapons surrendered.", + "Sentence": "Within the overall mandates given to them by their respective institutions, UNMIL is expected to perform the following functions within the DDRR programme: \n provide relevant input and information as well as security assistance and advice with regard to the selection of potential sites for disarmament and demobilization; \n provide technical input with regard to the process of disarmament, registration, docu- mentation and screening of potential candidates for demobilization; \n develop and install systems for arms control and advise on a larger legislative frame- work to monitor and control arms recycling; \n monitor and verify the conformity of the DDR process according to recognized and acceptable standards; \n assume responsibility for effecting disarmament of combatants, maintain a pertinent registry of surrendered weaponry and conduct pre-demobilization screening and evaluation; and \n ensure the destruction of all weapons surrendered.", "newParagraph": "military liaison office created facilitate cooperation unmil dd unit securityrelated aspect programme within overall mandate given respective institution unmil expected perform following function within ddrr programme n provide relevant input information well security assistance advice regard selection potential site disarmament demobilization n provide technical input regard process disarmament registration docu mentation screening potential candidate demobilization n develop install system arm control advise larger legislative frame work monitor control arm recycling n monitor verify conformity ddr process according recognized acceptable standard n assume responsibility effecting disarmament combatant maintain pertinent registry surrendered weaponry conduct predemobilization screening evaluation n ensure destruction weapon surrendered", "ProcessedSent": "within overall mandate given respective institution unmil expected perform following function within ddrr programme n provide relevant input information well security assistance advice regard selection potential site disarmament demobilization n provide technical input regard process disarmament registration docu mentation screening potential candidate demobilization n develop install system arm control advise larger legislative frame work monitor control arm recycling n monitor verify conformity ddr process according recognized acceptable standard n assume responsibility effecting disarmament combatant maintain pertinent registry surrendered weaponry conduct predemobilization screening evaluation n ensure destruction weapon surrendered", "SentID": 2968 @@ -53461,7 +53461,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 972, - "Paragraph": "Implementing agencies will be selected on the basis of the following criteria: \\n Track record and technical capacity. The agency must demonstrate a track record of technical and functional expertise in its chosen area of participation for not less then four years; \\n Financial management capacity. It needs to demonstrate a proven record of sound finan- cial management and\/or the capacity to pre-finance initial project costs. It must provide audited financial record for the past three years; \\n Management capacity. The agency must demonstrate sound management capability in respect of the programme delivery structure and expertise.", + "Paragraph": "Implementing agencies will be selected on the basis of the following criteria: \n Track record and technical capacity. The agency must demonstrate a track record of technical and functional expertise in its chosen area of participation for not less then four years; \n Financial management capacity. It needs to demonstrate a proven record of sound finan- cial management and\/or the capacity to pre-finance initial project costs. It must provide audited financial record for the past three years; \n Management capacity. The agency must demonstrate sound management capability in respect of the programme delivery structure and expertise.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -53472,14 +53472,14 @@ "Heading2": "Role of implementing partners and selection criteria", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Implementing agencies will be selected on the basis of the following criteria: \\n Track record and technical capacity.", + "Sentence": "Implementing agencies will be selected on the basis of the following criteria: \n Track record and technical capacity.", "newParagraph": "implementing agency selected basis following criterion n track record technical capacity agency must demonstrate track record technical functional expertise chosen area participation le four year n financial management capacity need demonstrate proven record sound finan cial management andor capacity prefinance initial project cost must provide audited financial record past three year n management capacity agency must demonstrate sound management capability respect programme delivery structure expertise", "ProcessedSent": "implementing agency selected basis following criterion n track record technical capacity", "SentID": 2970 }, { "ParagraphID": 972, - "Paragraph": "Implementing agencies will be selected on the basis of the following criteria: \\n Track record and technical capacity. The agency must demonstrate a track record of technical and functional expertise in its chosen area of participation for not less then four years; \\n Financial management capacity. It needs to demonstrate a proven record of sound finan- cial management and\/or the capacity to pre-finance initial project costs. It must provide audited financial record for the past three years; \\n Management capacity. The agency must demonstrate sound management capability in respect of the programme delivery structure and expertise.", + "Paragraph": "Implementing agencies will be selected on the basis of the following criteria: \n Track record and technical capacity. The agency must demonstrate a track record of technical and functional expertise in its chosen area of participation for not less then four years; \n Financial management capacity. It needs to demonstrate a proven record of sound finan- cial management and\/or the capacity to pre-finance initial project costs. It must provide audited financial record for the past three years; \n Management capacity. The agency must demonstrate sound management capability in respect of the programme delivery structure and expertise.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -53490,14 +53490,14 @@ "Heading2": "Role of implementing partners and selection criteria", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The agency must demonstrate a track record of technical and functional expertise in its chosen area of participation for not less then four years; \\n Financial management capacity.", + "Sentence": "The agency must demonstrate a track record of technical and functional expertise in its chosen area of participation for not less then four years; \n Financial management capacity.", "newParagraph": "implementing agency selected basis following criterion n track record technical capacity agency must demonstrate track record technical functional expertise chosen area participation le four year n financial management capacity need demonstrate proven record sound finan cial management andor capacity prefinance initial project cost must provide audited financial record past three year n management capacity agency must demonstrate sound management capability respect programme delivery structure expertise", "ProcessedSent": "agency must demonstrate track record technical functional expertise chosen area participation le four year n financial management capacity", "SentID": 2971 }, { "ParagraphID": 972, - "Paragraph": "Implementing agencies will be selected on the basis of the following criteria: \\n Track record and technical capacity. The agency must demonstrate a track record of technical and functional expertise in its chosen area of participation for not less then four years; \\n Financial management capacity. It needs to demonstrate a proven record of sound finan- cial management and\/or the capacity to pre-finance initial project costs. It must provide audited financial record for the past three years; \\n Management capacity. The agency must demonstrate sound management capability in respect of the programme delivery structure and expertise.", + "Paragraph": "Implementing agencies will be selected on the basis of the following criteria: \n Track record and technical capacity. The agency must demonstrate a track record of technical and functional expertise in its chosen area of participation for not less then four years; \n Financial management capacity. It needs to demonstrate a proven record of sound finan- cial management and\/or the capacity to pre-finance initial project costs. It must provide audited financial record for the past three years; \n Management capacity. The agency must demonstrate sound management capability in respect of the programme delivery structure and expertise.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -53515,7 +53515,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 972, - "Paragraph": "Implementing agencies will be selected on the basis of the following criteria: \\n Track record and technical capacity. The agency must demonstrate a track record of technical and functional expertise in its chosen area of participation for not less then four years; \\n Financial management capacity. It needs to demonstrate a proven record of sound finan- cial management and\/or the capacity to pre-finance initial project costs. It must provide audited financial record for the past three years; \\n Management capacity. The agency must demonstrate sound management capability in respect of the programme delivery structure and expertise.", + "Paragraph": "Implementing agencies will be selected on the basis of the following criteria: \n Track record and technical capacity. The agency must demonstrate a track record of technical and functional expertise in its chosen area of participation for not less then four years; \n Financial management capacity. It needs to demonstrate a proven record of sound finan- cial management and\/or the capacity to pre-finance initial project costs. It must provide audited financial record for the past three years; \n Management capacity. The agency must demonstrate sound management capability in respect of the programme delivery structure and expertise.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -53526,14 +53526,14 @@ "Heading2": "Role of implementing partners and selection criteria", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "It must provide audited financial record for the past three years; \\n Management capacity.", + "Sentence": "It must provide audited financial record for the past three years; \n Management capacity.", "newParagraph": "implementing agency selected basis following criterion n track record technical capacity agency must demonstrate track record technical functional expertise chosen area participation le four year n financial management capacity need demonstrate proven record sound finan cial management andor capacity prefinance initial project cost must provide audited financial record past three year n management capacity agency must demonstrate sound management capability respect programme delivery structure expertise", "ProcessedSent": "must provide audited financial record past three year n management capacity", "SentID": 2973 }, { "ParagraphID": 972, - "Paragraph": "Implementing agencies will be selected on the basis of the following criteria: \\n Track record and technical capacity. The agency must demonstrate a track record of technical and functional expertise in its chosen area of participation for not less then four years; \\n Financial management capacity. It needs to demonstrate a proven record of sound finan- cial management and\/or the capacity to pre-finance initial project costs. It must provide audited financial record for the past three years; \\n Management capacity. The agency must demonstrate sound management capability in respect of the programme delivery structure and expertise.", + "Paragraph": "Implementing agencies will be selected on the basis of the following criteria: \n Track record and technical capacity. The agency must demonstrate a track record of technical and functional expertise in its chosen area of participation for not less then four years; \n Financial management capacity. It needs to demonstrate a proven record of sound finan- cial management and\/or the capacity to pre-finance initial project costs. It must provide audited financial record for the past three years; \n Management capacity. The agency must demonstrate sound management capability in respect of the programme delivery structure and expertise.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -53605,7 +53605,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 975, - "Paragraph": "How soldiers are demobilized affects the reinsertion and reintegration processes. At each phase: \\n the administration of assistance has to be accounted for; \\n weapons collected need to be classified and analysed; \\n beneficiaries of reintegration assistance need to be tracked; and \\n the quality of services provided during the implementation of the programme needs to be assessed.", + "Paragraph": "How soldiers are demobilized affects the reinsertion and reintegration processes. At each phase: \n the administration of assistance has to be accounted for; \n weapons collected need to be classified and analysed; \n beneficiaries of reintegration assistance need to be tracked; and \n the quality of services provided during the implementation of the programme needs to be assessed.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -53623,7 +53623,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 975, - "Paragraph": "How soldiers are demobilized affects the reinsertion and reintegration processes. At each phase: \\n the administration of assistance has to be accounted for; \\n weapons collected need to be classified and analysed; \\n beneficiaries of reintegration assistance need to be tracked; and \\n the quality of services provided during the implementation of the programme needs to be assessed.", + "Paragraph": "How soldiers are demobilized affects the reinsertion and reintegration processes. At each phase: \n the administration of assistance has to be accounted for; \n weapons collected need to be classified and analysed; \n beneficiaries of reintegration assistance need to be tracked; and \n the quality of services provided during the implementation of the programme needs to be assessed.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -53634,14 +53634,14 @@ "Heading2": "Monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "At each phase: \\n the administration of assistance has to be accounted for; \\n weapons collected need to be classified and analysed; \\n beneficiaries of reintegration assistance need to be tracked; and \\n the quality of services provided during the implementation of the programme needs to be assessed.", + "Sentence": "At each phase: \n the administration of assistance has to be accounted for; \n weapons collected need to be classified and analysed; \n beneficiaries of reintegration assistance need to be tracked; and \n the quality of services provided during the implementation of the programme needs to be assessed.", "newParagraph": "soldier demobilized affect reinsertion reintegration process phase n administration assistance accounted n weapon collected need classified analysed n beneficiary reintegration assistance need tracked n quality service provided implementation programme need assessed", "ProcessedSent": "phase n administration assistance accounted n weapon collected need classified analysed n beneficiary reintegration assistance need tracked n quality service provided implementation programme need assessed", "SentID": 2979 }, { "ParagraphID": 976, - "Paragraph": "To plan, monitor and evaluate the processes, a management information system (MIS) regarding the discharged ex-combatants is required and will contain the following components: \\n a database on the basic socio-economic profile of ex-combatants; \\n a database on disarmament and weapons classification; \\n a database of tracking benefit administration such as on payments of the settling-in package, training scholarships and employment subsidies to the ex-combatants; and \\n a database on the programme\u2019s financial flows.", + "Paragraph": "To plan, monitor and evaluate the processes, a management information system (MIS) regarding the discharged ex-combatants is required and will contain the following components: \n a database on the basic socio-economic profile of ex-combatants; \n a database on disarmament and weapons classification; \n a database of tracking benefit administration such as on payments of the settling-in package, training scholarships and employment subsidies to the ex-combatants; and \n a database on the programme\u2019s financial flows.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -53652,7 +53652,7 @@ "Heading2": "Monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "To plan, monitor and evaluate the processes, a management information system (MIS) regarding the discharged ex-combatants is required and will contain the following components: \\n a database on the basic socio-economic profile of ex-combatants; \\n a database on disarmament and weapons classification; \\n a database of tracking benefit administration such as on payments of the settling-in package, training scholarships and employment subsidies to the ex-combatants; and \\n a database on the programme\u2019s financial flows.", + "Sentence": "To plan, monitor and evaluate the processes, a management information system (MIS) regarding the discharged ex-combatants is required and will contain the following components: \n a database on the basic socio-economic profile of ex-combatants; \n a database on disarmament and weapons classification; \n a database of tracking benefit administration such as on payments of the settling-in package, training scholarships and employment subsidies to the ex-combatants; and \n a database on the programme\u2019s financial flows.", "newParagraph": "plan monitor evaluate process management information system mi regarding discharged excombatants required contain following component n database basic socioeconomic profile excombatants n database disarmament weapon classification n database tracking benefit administration payment settlingin package training scholarship employment subsidy excombatants n database programme financial flow", "ProcessedSent": "plan monitor evaluate process management information system mi regarding discharged excombatants required contain following component n database basic socioeconomic profile excombatants n database disarmament weapon classification n database tracking benefit administration payment settlingin package training scholarship employment subsidy excombatants n database programme financial flow", "SentID": 2980 @@ -54217,7 +54217,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 990, - "Paragraph": "The responsibilities of the TCC will be to: \\n identify strategic, operational and technical issues that may have an impact on the dis- armament, demobilisation and reintegration process; \\n develop technical standards, guidelines, and operating principles, which will be adhered to by all involved in the implementation of specific DDRR activities; \\n provide the framework for securing the support of key partners with regard to input to planning and implementing disarmament and demobilization activities as well as the reintegration process; \\n provide the basis for operational planning and consensus on issues relating to disarm- ament, demobilization and reintegration; and \\n on a regular basis identify key policy issues that need to be resolved by the policy com- mittee and provide policy options to the NCDDRR for consideration.", + "Paragraph": "The responsibilities of the TCC will be to: \n identify strategic, operational and technical issues that may have an impact on the dis- armament, demobilisation and reintegration process; \n develop technical standards, guidelines, and operating principles, which will be adhered to by all involved in the implementation of specific DDRR activities; \n provide the framework for securing the support of key partners with regard to input to planning and implementing disarmament and demobilization activities as well as the reintegration process; \n provide the basis for operational planning and consensus on issues relating to disarm- ament, demobilization and reintegration; and \n on a regular basis identify key policy issues that need to be resolved by the policy com- mittee and provide policy options to the NCDDRR for consideration.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -54228,7 +54228,7 @@ "Heading2": "Technical Coordination Committee", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The responsibilities of the TCC will be to: \\n identify strategic, operational and technical issues that may have an impact on the dis- armament, demobilisation and reintegration process; \\n develop technical standards, guidelines, and operating principles, which will be adhered to by all involved in the implementation of specific DDRR activities; \\n provide the framework for securing the support of key partners with regard to input to planning and implementing disarmament and demobilization activities as well as the reintegration process; \\n provide the basis for operational planning and consensus on issues relating to disarm- ament, demobilization and reintegration; and \\n on a regular basis identify key policy issues that need to be resolved by the policy com- mittee and provide policy options to the NCDDRR for consideration.", + "Sentence": "The responsibilities of the TCC will be to: \n identify strategic, operational and technical issues that may have an impact on the dis- armament, demobilisation and reintegration process; \n develop technical standards, guidelines, and operating principles, which will be adhered to by all involved in the implementation of specific DDRR activities; \n provide the framework for securing the support of key partners with regard to input to planning and implementing disarmament and demobilization activities as well as the reintegration process; \n provide the basis for operational planning and consensus on issues relating to disarm- ament, demobilization and reintegration; and \n on a regular basis identify key policy issues that need to be resolved by the policy com- mittee and provide policy options to the NCDDRR for consideration.", "newParagraph": "responsibility tcc n identify strategic operational technical issue may impact dis armament demobilisation reintegration process n develop technical standard guideline operating principle adhered involved implementation specific ddrr activity n provide framework securing support key partner regard input planning implementing disarmament demobilization activity well reintegration process n provide basis operational planning consensus issue relating disarm ament demobilization reintegration n regular basis identify key policy issue need resolved policy com mittee provide policy option ncddrr consideration", "ProcessedSent": "responsibility tcc n identify strategic operational technical issue may impact dis armament demobilisation reintegration process n develop technical standard guideline operating principle adhered involved implementation specific ddrr activity n provide framework securing support key partner regard input planning implementing disarmament demobilization activity well reintegration process n provide basis operational planning consensus issue relating disarm ament demobilization reintegration n regular basis identify key policy issue need resolved policy com mittee provide policy option ncddrr consideration", "SentID": 3012 @@ -54397,7 +54397,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 993, - "Paragraph": "1 See The Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post\u00adConflict Societies, report of the Secretary- General to the Security Council, S\/2004\/616, 3 August 2004. \\n 2 Ibid., p. 4.", + "Paragraph": "1 See The Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post\u00adConflict Societies, report of the Secretary- General to the Security Council, S\/2004\/616, 3 August 2004. \n 2 Ibid., p. 4.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -54415,7 +54415,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 993, - "Paragraph": "1 See The Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post\u00adConflict Societies, report of the Secretary- General to the Security Council, S\/2004\/616, 3 August 2004. \\n 2 Ibid., p. 4.", + "Paragraph": "1 See The Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post\u00adConflict Societies, report of the Secretary- General to the Security Council, S\/2004\/616, 3 August 2004. \n 2 Ibid., p. 4.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -54426,7 +54426,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 2 Ibid., p. 4.", + "Sentence": "\n 2 Ibid., p. 4.", "newParagraph": "1 see rule law transitional justice conflict post conflict society report secretary general security council s2004616 3 august 2004 n 2 ibid p 4", "ProcessedSent": "n 2 ibid p 4", "SentID": 3023 @@ -54793,7 +54793,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1001, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -54811,7 +54811,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1001, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -54822,14 +54822,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard.", + "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard.", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "ProcessedSent": "use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard", "SentID": 3045 }, { "ParagraphID": 1001, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -54840,14 +54840,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications.", + "Sentence": "\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications.", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "ProcessedSent": "n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification", "SentID": 3046 }, { "ParagraphID": 1001, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -54858,7 +54858,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Sentence": "\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "ProcessedSent": "n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "SentID": 3047 @@ -54901,7 +54901,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1003, - "Paragraph": "The planning of the logistic support for DDR programmes is guided by the principles, key considerations and approaches outlined in IDDRS 2.10 on the UN Approach to DDR; in particular: \\n unity of effort in the planning and implementation of support for all phases of the DDR programme, bearing in mind that different UN (and other) actors have a role to play in support of the DDR programme; \\n accountability, transparency and flexibility in using the most appropriate support mech- anisms available to ensure an efficient and effective DDR programme, from the funding through to logistic support, bearing in mind that DDR activities may not occur sequen- tially (i.e., one after the other); \\n a people-centred approach, by catering for the different and specific needs (such as dietary, medical and gender-specific requirements) of the participants and beneficiaries of the DDR programme; \\n means of ensuring safety and security, which is a major consideration, as reliable estimates of the size and extent of the DDR operation may not be available; contingency planning must therefore also be included in logistics planning.", + "Paragraph": "The planning of the logistic support for DDR programmes is guided by the principles, key considerations and approaches outlined in IDDRS 2.10 on the UN Approach to DDR; in particular: \n unity of effort in the planning and implementation of support for all phases of the DDR programme, bearing in mind that different UN (and other) actors have a role to play in support of the DDR programme; \n accountability, transparency and flexibility in using the most appropriate support mech- anisms available to ensure an efficient and effective DDR programme, from the funding through to logistic support, bearing in mind that DDR activities may not occur sequen- tially (i.e., one after the other); \n a people-centred approach, by catering for the different and specific needs (such as dietary, medical and gender-specific requirements) of the participants and beneficiaries of the DDR programme; \n means of ensuring safety and security, which is a major consideration, as reliable estimates of the size and extent of the DDR operation may not be available; contingency planning must therefore also be included in logistics planning.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -54912,14 +54912,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The planning of the logistic support for DDR programmes is guided by the principles, key considerations and approaches outlined in IDDRS 2.10 on the UN Approach to DDR; in particular: \\n unity of effort in the planning and implementation of support for all phases of the DDR programme, bearing in mind that different UN (and other) actors have a role to play in support of the DDR programme; \\n accountability, transparency and flexibility in using the most appropriate support mech- anisms available to ensure an efficient and effective DDR programme, from the funding through to logistic support, bearing in mind that DDR activities may not occur sequen- tially (i.e., one after the other); \\n a people-centred approach, by catering for the different and specific needs (such as dietary, medical and gender-specific requirements) of the participants and beneficiaries of the DDR programme; \\n means of ensuring safety and security, which is a major consideration, as reliable estimates of the size and extent of the DDR operation may not be available; contingency planning must therefore also be included in logistics planning.", + "Sentence": "The planning of the logistic support for DDR programmes is guided by the principles, key considerations and approaches outlined in IDDRS 2.10 on the UN Approach to DDR; in particular: \n unity of effort in the planning and implementation of support for all phases of the DDR programme, bearing in mind that different UN (and other) actors have a role to play in support of the DDR programme; \n accountability, transparency and flexibility in using the most appropriate support mech- anisms available to ensure an efficient and effective DDR programme, from the funding through to logistic support, bearing in mind that DDR activities may not occur sequen- tially (i.e., one after the other); \n a people-centred approach, by catering for the different and specific needs (such as dietary, medical and gender-specific requirements) of the participants and beneficiaries of the DDR programme; \n means of ensuring safety and security, which is a major consideration, as reliable estimates of the size and extent of the DDR operation may not be available; contingency planning must therefore also be included in logistics planning.", "newParagraph": "planning logistic support ddr programme guided principle key consideration approach outlined iddrs 210 un approach ddr particular n unity effort planning implementation support phase ddr programme bearing mind different un actor role play support ddr programme n accountability transparency flexibility using appropriate support mech anisms available ensure efficient effective ddr programme funding logistic support bearing mind ddr activity may occur sequen tially ie one n peoplecentred approach catering different specific need dietary medical genderspecific requirement participant beneficiary ddr programme n mean ensuring safety security major consideration reliable estimate size extent ddr operation may available contingency planning must therefore also included logistics planning", "ProcessedSent": "planning logistic support ddr programme guided principle key consideration approach outlined iddrs 210 un approach ddr particular n unity effort planning implementation support phase ddr programme bearing mind different un actor role play support ddr programme n accountability transparency flexibility using appropriate support mech anisms available ensure efficient effective ddr programme funding logistic support bearing mind ddr activity may occur sequen tially ie one n peoplecentred approach catering different specific need dietary medical genderspecific requirement participant beneficiary ddr programme n mean ensuring safety security major consideration reliable estimate size extent ddr operation may available contingency planning must therefore also included logistics planning", "SentID": 3050 }, { "ParagraphID": 1004, - "Paragraph": "Depending on the specific character of the DDR programme, some or all of the following support services may be required: \\n living accommodation; \\n camp construction material, including outsourcing of construction and management; \\n fire prevention and precautions, and fire-fighting equipment; \\n working accommodation; \\n office furniture; \\n office equipment and supplies; \\n communications; \\n information technology; \\n medical services capable of responding to different needs; \\n movement control; \\n surface transport; \\n air transport; \\n water; \\n food rations; food preparation and supply arrangements; \\n fuel; \\n general services such as janitorial, waste disposal, etc.; \\n security; \\n management information software, identity card machines; \\n weapons destruction equipment.", + "Paragraph": "Depending on the specific character of the DDR programme, some or all of the following support services may be required: \n living accommodation; \n camp construction material, including outsourcing of construction and management; \n fire prevention and precautions, and fire-fighting equipment; \n working accommodation; \n office furniture; \n office equipment and supplies; \n communications; \n information technology; \n medical services capable of responding to different needs; \n movement control; \n surface transport; \n air transport; \n water; \n food rations; food preparation and supply arrangements; \n fuel; \n general services such as janitorial, waste disposal, etc.; \n security; \n management information software, identity card machines; \n weapons destruction equipment.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -54930,14 +54930,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1. Equipment and services", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Depending on the specific character of the DDR programme, some or all of the following support services may be required: \\n living accommodation; \\n camp construction material, including outsourcing of construction and management; \\n fire prevention and precautions, and fire-fighting equipment; \\n working accommodation; \\n office furniture; \\n office equipment and supplies; \\n communications; \\n information technology; \\n medical services capable of responding to different needs; \\n movement control; \\n surface transport; \\n air transport; \\n water; \\n food rations; food preparation and supply arrangements; \\n fuel; \\n general services such as janitorial, waste disposal, etc.", + "Sentence": "Depending on the specific character of the DDR programme, some or all of the following support services may be required: \n living accommodation; \n camp construction material, including outsourcing of construction and management; \n fire prevention and precautions, and fire-fighting equipment; \n working accommodation; \n office furniture; \n office equipment and supplies; \n communications; \n information technology; \n medical services capable of responding to different needs; \n movement control; \n surface transport; \n air transport; \n water; \n food rations; food preparation and supply arrangements; \n fuel; \n general services such as janitorial, waste disposal, etc.", "newParagraph": "depending specific character ddr programme following support service may required n living accommodation n camp construction material including outsourcing construction management n fire prevention precaution firefighting equipment n working accommodation n office furniture n office equipment supply n communication n information technology n medical service capable responding different need n movement control n surface transport n air transport n water n food ration food preparation supply arrangement n fuel n general service janitorial waste disposal etc n security n management information software identity card machine n weapon destruction equipment", "ProcessedSent": "depending specific character ddr programme following support service may required n living accommodation n camp construction material including outsourcing construction management n fire prevention precaution firefighting equipment n working accommodation n office furniture n office equipment supply n communication n information technology n medical service capable responding different need n movement control n surface transport n air transport n water n food ration food preparation supply arrangement n fuel n general service janitorial waste disposal etc", "SentID": 3051 }, { "ParagraphID": 1004, - "Paragraph": "Depending on the specific character of the DDR programme, some or all of the following support services may be required: \\n living accommodation; \\n camp construction material, including outsourcing of construction and management; \\n fire prevention and precautions, and fire-fighting equipment; \\n working accommodation; \\n office furniture; \\n office equipment and supplies; \\n communications; \\n information technology; \\n medical services capable of responding to different needs; \\n movement control; \\n surface transport; \\n air transport; \\n water; \\n food rations; food preparation and supply arrangements; \\n fuel; \\n general services such as janitorial, waste disposal, etc.; \\n security; \\n management information software, identity card machines; \\n weapons destruction equipment.", + "Paragraph": "Depending on the specific character of the DDR programme, some or all of the following support services may be required: \n living accommodation; \n camp construction material, including outsourcing of construction and management; \n fire prevention and precautions, and fire-fighting equipment; \n working accommodation; \n office furniture; \n office equipment and supplies; \n communications; \n information technology; \n medical services capable of responding to different needs; \n movement control; \n surface transport; \n air transport; \n water; \n food rations; food preparation and supply arrangements; \n fuel; \n general services such as janitorial, waste disposal, etc.; \n security; \n management information software, identity card machines; \n weapons destruction equipment.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -54948,7 +54948,7 @@ "Heading2": "5.1. Equipment and services", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "; \\n security; \\n management information software, identity card machines; \\n weapons destruction equipment.", + "Sentence": "; \n security; \n management information software, identity card machines; \n weapons destruction equipment.", "newParagraph": "depending specific character ddr programme following support service may required n living accommodation n camp construction material including outsourcing construction management n fire prevention precaution firefighting equipment n working accommodation n office furniture n office equipment supply n communication n information technology n medical service capable responding different need n movement control n surface transport n air transport n water n food ration food preparation supply arrangement n fuel n general service janitorial waste disposal etc n security n management information software identity card machine n weapon destruction equipment", "ProcessedSent": " n security n management information software identity card machine n weapon destruction equipment", "SentID": 3052 @@ -55099,7 +55099,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1009, - "Paragraph": "DDR is one component of a multidimensional peacekeeping operation. Other components may include: \\n mission civilian substantive staff and the staff of political, humanitarian, human rights, public information, etc., programmes; \\n military and civilian police headquarters staff and their functions; \\n military observers and their activities; \\n military contingents and their operations; \\n civilian police officers and their activities; \\n formed police units and their operations; \\n UN support staffs; \\n other UN agencies, programmes and funds, as mandated.", + "Paragraph": "DDR is one component of a multidimensional peacekeeping operation. Other components may include: \n mission civilian substantive staff and the staff of political, humanitarian, human rights, public information, etc., programmes; \n military and civilian police headquarters staff and their functions; \n military observers and their activities; \n military contingents and their operations; \n civilian police officers and their activities; \n formed police units and their operations; \n UN support staffs; \n other UN agencies, programmes and funds, as mandated.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -55117,7 +55117,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1009, - "Paragraph": "DDR is one component of a multidimensional peacekeeping operation. Other components may include: \\n mission civilian substantive staff and the staff of political, humanitarian, human rights, public information, etc., programmes; \\n military and civilian police headquarters staff and their functions; \\n military observers and their activities; \\n military contingents and their operations; \\n civilian police officers and their activities; \\n formed police units and their operations; \\n UN support staffs; \\n other UN agencies, programmes and funds, as mandated.", + "Paragraph": "DDR is one component of a multidimensional peacekeeping operation. Other components may include: \n mission civilian substantive staff and the staff of political, humanitarian, human rights, public information, etc., programmes; \n military and civilian police headquarters staff and their functions; \n military observers and their activities; \n military contingents and their operations; \n civilian police officers and their activities; \n formed police units and their operations; \n UN support staffs; \n other UN agencies, programmes and funds, as mandated.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -55128,14 +55128,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.2. A multidimensional operation", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Other components may include: \\n mission civilian substantive staff and the staff of political, humanitarian, human rights, public information, etc., programmes; \\n military and civilian police headquarters staff and their functions; \\n military observers and their activities; \\n military contingents and their operations; \\n civilian police officers and their activities; \\n formed police units and their operations; \\n UN support staffs; \\n other UN agencies, programmes and funds, as mandated.", + "Sentence": "Other components may include: \n mission civilian substantive staff and the staff of political, humanitarian, human rights, public information, etc., programmes; \n military and civilian police headquarters staff and their functions; \n military observers and their activities; \n military contingents and their operations; \n civilian police officers and their activities; \n formed police units and their operations; \n UN support staffs; \n other UN agencies, programmes and funds, as mandated.", "newParagraph": "ddr one component multidimensional peacekeeping operation component may include n mission civilian substantive staff staff political humanitarian human right public information etc programme n military civilian police headquarters staff function n military observer activity n military contingent operation n civilian police officer activity n formed police unit operation n un support staff n un agency programme fund mandated", "ProcessedSent": "component may include n mission civilian substantive staff staff political humanitarian human right public information etc programme n military civilian police headquarters staff function n military observer activity n military contingent operation n civilian police officer activity n formed police unit operation n un support staff n un agency programme fund mandated", "SentID": 3062 }, { "ParagraphID": 1010, - "Paragraph": "The quality and timeliness of DDR logistic support to a peacekeeping mission depend on the quality and timeliness of information provided by DDR planners and managers to logistics planners. DDR programme managers need to state the logistic requirements that fall under the direct managerial or financial scope of the peacekeeping mission and DPKO. In addition, the logistic requirements have to be submitted to the Division of Administration as early as possible to ensure timely logistic support. Some of the more important elements are listed below as a guideline: \\n estimated total number of ex-combatants, broken down according to sex, age, dis- ability or illness, parties\/groups and locations\/sectors; \\n estimated total number of weapons, broken down according to type of weap- on, ammunition, explosives, etc.; \\n time-lineoftheentireprogramme, show- ing start\/completion of activities; \\n allocation of resources, materials and services included in the assessed budget; \\n names of all participating UN entities, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and other implementing partners, with their focal points and telephone numbers\/email addresses; \\n forums\/meetings and other coordination mechanisms where Joint Logistics Operations Centre (JLOC) participation is requested; \\n requirement of office premises, office furniture, office equipment and related services, with locations; \\n ground transport requirements \u2014 types and quantities; \\n air transport requirements; \\n communications requirements, including identity card machines; \\n medical support requirements; \\n number and location of various disarmament sites, camps, cantonments and other facilities; \\n layout of each site, camp\/cantonment with specifications, including: \\n\\n camp\/site management structure with designations and responsibilities of officials; \\n\\n number and type of combatants, and their sex and age; \\n\\n number and type of all categories of staff, including NGOs\u2019 staff, expected in the camp; \\n\\n nature of activities to be conducted in the site\/camp and special requirements for rations storage, distribution of insertion benefits, etc.; \\n\\n security considerations and requirements; \\n\\n preferred type of construction; \\n\\n services\/amenities provided by NGOs; \\n\\n camp services to be provided by the mission, as well as any other specific requirements; \\n\\n dietary restrictions\/considerations; \\n\\n fire-fighting equipment; \\n\\n camp evacuation standard operating procedures; \\n\\n policy on employment of ex-combatants as labourers in camp construction.", + "Paragraph": "The quality and timeliness of DDR logistic support to a peacekeeping mission depend on the quality and timeliness of information provided by DDR planners and managers to logistics planners. DDR programme managers need to state the logistic requirements that fall under the direct managerial or financial scope of the peacekeeping mission and DPKO. In addition, the logistic requirements have to be submitted to the Division of Administration as early as possible to ensure timely logistic support. Some of the more important elements are listed below as a guideline: \n estimated total number of ex-combatants, broken down according to sex, age, dis- ability or illness, parties\/groups and locations\/sectors; \n estimated total number of weapons, broken down according to type of weap- on, ammunition, explosives, etc.; \n time-lineoftheentireprogramme, show- ing start\/completion of activities; \n allocation of resources, materials and services included in the assessed budget; \n names of all participating UN entities, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and other implementing partners, with their focal points and telephone numbers\/email addresses; \n forums\/meetings and other coordination mechanisms where Joint Logistics Operations Centre (JLOC) participation is requested; \n requirement of office premises, office furniture, office equipment and related services, with locations; \n ground transport requirements \u2014 types and quantities; \n air transport requirements; \n communications requirements, including identity card machines; \n medical support requirements; \n number and location of various disarmament sites, camps, cantonments and other facilities; \n layout of each site, camp\/cantonment with specifications, including: \n\n camp\/site management structure with designations and responsibilities of officials; \n\n number and type of combatants, and their sex and age; \n\n number and type of all categories of staff, including NGOs\u2019 staff, expected in the camp; \n\n nature of activities to be conducted in the site\/camp and special requirements for rations storage, distribution of insertion benefits, etc.; \n\n security considerations and requirements; \n\n preferred type of construction; \n\n services\/amenities provided by NGOs; \n\n camp services to be provided by the mission, as well as any other specific requirements; \n\n dietary restrictions\/considerations; \n\n fire-fighting equipment; \n\n camp evacuation standard operating procedures; \n\n policy on employment of ex-combatants as labourers in camp construction.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -55153,7 +55153,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1010, - "Paragraph": "The quality and timeliness of DDR logistic support to a peacekeeping mission depend on the quality and timeliness of information provided by DDR planners and managers to logistics planners. DDR programme managers need to state the logistic requirements that fall under the direct managerial or financial scope of the peacekeeping mission and DPKO. In addition, the logistic requirements have to be submitted to the Division of Administration as early as possible to ensure timely logistic support. Some of the more important elements are listed below as a guideline: \\n estimated total number of ex-combatants, broken down according to sex, age, dis- ability or illness, parties\/groups and locations\/sectors; \\n estimated total number of weapons, broken down according to type of weap- on, ammunition, explosives, etc.; \\n time-lineoftheentireprogramme, show- ing start\/completion of activities; \\n allocation of resources, materials and services included in the assessed budget; \\n names of all participating UN entities, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and other implementing partners, with their focal points and telephone numbers\/email addresses; \\n forums\/meetings and other coordination mechanisms where Joint Logistics Operations Centre (JLOC) participation is requested; \\n requirement of office premises, office furniture, office equipment and related services, with locations; \\n ground transport requirements \u2014 types and quantities; \\n air transport requirements; \\n communications requirements, including identity card machines; \\n medical support requirements; \\n number and location of various disarmament sites, camps, cantonments and other facilities; \\n layout of each site, camp\/cantonment with specifications, including: \\n\\n camp\/site management structure with designations and responsibilities of officials; \\n\\n number and type of combatants, and their sex and age; \\n\\n number and type of all categories of staff, including NGOs\u2019 staff, expected in the camp; \\n\\n nature of activities to be conducted in the site\/camp and special requirements for rations storage, distribution of insertion benefits, etc.; \\n\\n security considerations and requirements; \\n\\n preferred type of construction; \\n\\n services\/amenities provided by NGOs; \\n\\n camp services to be provided by the mission, as well as any other specific requirements; \\n\\n dietary restrictions\/considerations; \\n\\n fire-fighting equipment; \\n\\n camp evacuation standard operating procedures; \\n\\n policy on employment of ex-combatants as labourers in camp construction.", + "Paragraph": "The quality and timeliness of DDR logistic support to a peacekeeping mission depend on the quality and timeliness of information provided by DDR planners and managers to logistics planners. DDR programme managers need to state the logistic requirements that fall under the direct managerial or financial scope of the peacekeeping mission and DPKO. In addition, the logistic requirements have to be submitted to the Division of Administration as early as possible to ensure timely logistic support. Some of the more important elements are listed below as a guideline: \n estimated total number of ex-combatants, broken down according to sex, age, dis- ability or illness, parties\/groups and locations\/sectors; \n estimated total number of weapons, broken down according to type of weap- on, ammunition, explosives, etc.; \n time-lineoftheentireprogramme, show- ing start\/completion of activities; \n allocation of resources, materials and services included in the assessed budget; \n names of all participating UN entities, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and other implementing partners, with their focal points and telephone numbers\/email addresses; \n forums\/meetings and other coordination mechanisms where Joint Logistics Operations Centre (JLOC) participation is requested; \n requirement of office premises, office furniture, office equipment and related services, with locations; \n ground transport requirements \u2014 types and quantities; \n air transport requirements; \n communications requirements, including identity card machines; \n medical support requirements; \n number and location of various disarmament sites, camps, cantonments and other facilities; \n layout of each site, camp\/cantonment with specifications, including: \n\n camp\/site management structure with designations and responsibilities of officials; \n\n number and type of combatants, and their sex and age; \n\n number and type of all categories of staff, including NGOs\u2019 staff, expected in the camp; \n\n nature of activities to be conducted in the site\/camp and special requirements for rations storage, distribution of insertion benefits, etc.; \n\n security considerations and requirements; \n\n preferred type of construction; \n\n services\/amenities provided by NGOs; \n\n camp services to be provided by the mission, as well as any other specific requirements; \n\n dietary restrictions\/considerations; \n\n fire-fighting equipment; \n\n camp evacuation standard operating procedures; \n\n policy on employment of ex-combatants as labourers in camp construction.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -55171,7 +55171,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1010, - "Paragraph": "The quality and timeliness of DDR logistic support to a peacekeeping mission depend on the quality and timeliness of information provided by DDR planners and managers to logistics planners. DDR programme managers need to state the logistic requirements that fall under the direct managerial or financial scope of the peacekeeping mission and DPKO. In addition, the logistic requirements have to be submitted to the Division of Administration as early as possible to ensure timely logistic support. Some of the more important elements are listed below as a guideline: \\n estimated total number of ex-combatants, broken down according to sex, age, dis- ability or illness, parties\/groups and locations\/sectors; \\n estimated total number of weapons, broken down according to type of weap- on, ammunition, explosives, etc.; \\n time-lineoftheentireprogramme, show- ing start\/completion of activities; \\n allocation of resources, materials and services included in the assessed budget; \\n names of all participating UN entities, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and other implementing partners, with their focal points and telephone numbers\/email addresses; \\n forums\/meetings and other coordination mechanisms where Joint Logistics Operations Centre (JLOC) participation is requested; \\n requirement of office premises, office furniture, office equipment and related services, with locations; \\n ground transport requirements \u2014 types and quantities; \\n air transport requirements; \\n communications requirements, including identity card machines; \\n medical support requirements; \\n number and location of various disarmament sites, camps, cantonments and other facilities; \\n layout of each site, camp\/cantonment with specifications, including: \\n\\n camp\/site management structure with designations and responsibilities of officials; \\n\\n number and type of combatants, and their sex and age; \\n\\n number and type of all categories of staff, including NGOs\u2019 staff, expected in the camp; \\n\\n nature of activities to be conducted in the site\/camp and special requirements for rations storage, distribution of insertion benefits, etc.; \\n\\n security considerations and requirements; \\n\\n preferred type of construction; \\n\\n services\/amenities provided by NGOs; \\n\\n camp services to be provided by the mission, as well as any other specific requirements; \\n\\n dietary restrictions\/considerations; \\n\\n fire-fighting equipment; \\n\\n camp evacuation standard operating procedures; \\n\\n policy on employment of ex-combatants as labourers in camp construction.", + "Paragraph": "The quality and timeliness of DDR logistic support to a peacekeeping mission depend on the quality and timeliness of information provided by DDR planners and managers to logistics planners. DDR programme managers need to state the logistic requirements that fall under the direct managerial or financial scope of the peacekeeping mission and DPKO. In addition, the logistic requirements have to be submitted to the Division of Administration as early as possible to ensure timely logistic support. Some of the more important elements are listed below as a guideline: \n estimated total number of ex-combatants, broken down according to sex, age, dis- ability or illness, parties\/groups and locations\/sectors; \n estimated total number of weapons, broken down according to type of weap- on, ammunition, explosives, etc.; \n time-lineoftheentireprogramme, show- ing start\/completion of activities; \n allocation of resources, materials and services included in the assessed budget; \n names of all participating UN entities, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and other implementing partners, with their focal points and telephone numbers\/email addresses; \n forums\/meetings and other coordination mechanisms where Joint Logistics Operations Centre (JLOC) participation is requested; \n requirement of office premises, office furniture, office equipment and related services, with locations; \n ground transport requirements \u2014 types and quantities; \n air transport requirements; \n communications requirements, including identity card machines; \n medical support requirements; \n number and location of various disarmament sites, camps, cantonments and other facilities; \n layout of each site, camp\/cantonment with specifications, including: \n\n camp\/site management structure with designations and responsibilities of officials; \n\n number and type of combatants, and their sex and age; \n\n number and type of all categories of staff, including NGOs\u2019 staff, expected in the camp; \n\n nature of activities to be conducted in the site\/camp and special requirements for rations storage, distribution of insertion benefits, etc.; \n\n security considerations and requirements; \n\n preferred type of construction; \n\n services\/amenities provided by NGOs; \n\n camp services to be provided by the mission, as well as any other specific requirements; \n\n dietary restrictions\/considerations; \n\n fire-fighting equipment; \n\n camp evacuation standard operating procedures; \n\n policy on employment of ex-combatants as labourers in camp construction.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -55189,7 +55189,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1010, - "Paragraph": "The quality and timeliness of DDR logistic support to a peacekeeping mission depend on the quality and timeliness of information provided by DDR planners and managers to logistics planners. DDR programme managers need to state the logistic requirements that fall under the direct managerial or financial scope of the peacekeeping mission and DPKO. In addition, the logistic requirements have to be submitted to the Division of Administration as early as possible to ensure timely logistic support. Some of the more important elements are listed below as a guideline: \\n estimated total number of ex-combatants, broken down according to sex, age, dis- ability or illness, parties\/groups and locations\/sectors; \\n estimated total number of weapons, broken down according to type of weap- on, ammunition, explosives, etc.; \\n time-lineoftheentireprogramme, show- ing start\/completion of activities; \\n allocation of resources, materials and services included in the assessed budget; \\n names of all participating UN entities, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and other implementing partners, with their focal points and telephone numbers\/email addresses; \\n forums\/meetings and other coordination mechanisms where Joint Logistics Operations Centre (JLOC) participation is requested; \\n requirement of office premises, office furniture, office equipment and related services, with locations; \\n ground transport requirements \u2014 types and quantities; \\n air transport requirements; \\n communications requirements, including identity card machines; \\n medical support requirements; \\n number and location of various disarmament sites, camps, cantonments and other facilities; \\n layout of each site, camp\/cantonment with specifications, including: \\n\\n camp\/site management structure with designations and responsibilities of officials; \\n\\n number and type of combatants, and their sex and age; \\n\\n number and type of all categories of staff, including NGOs\u2019 staff, expected in the camp; \\n\\n nature of activities to be conducted in the site\/camp and special requirements for rations storage, distribution of insertion benefits, etc.; \\n\\n security considerations and requirements; \\n\\n preferred type of construction; \\n\\n services\/amenities provided by NGOs; \\n\\n camp services to be provided by the mission, as well as any other specific requirements; \\n\\n dietary restrictions\/considerations; \\n\\n fire-fighting equipment; \\n\\n camp evacuation standard operating procedures; \\n\\n policy on employment of ex-combatants as labourers in camp construction.", + "Paragraph": "The quality and timeliness of DDR logistic support to a peacekeeping mission depend on the quality and timeliness of information provided by DDR planners and managers to logistics planners. DDR programme managers need to state the logistic requirements that fall under the direct managerial or financial scope of the peacekeeping mission and DPKO. In addition, the logistic requirements have to be submitted to the Division of Administration as early as possible to ensure timely logistic support. Some of the more important elements are listed below as a guideline: \n estimated total number of ex-combatants, broken down according to sex, age, dis- ability or illness, parties\/groups and locations\/sectors; \n estimated total number of weapons, broken down according to type of weap- on, ammunition, explosives, etc.; \n time-lineoftheentireprogramme, show- ing start\/completion of activities; \n allocation of resources, materials and services included in the assessed budget; \n names of all participating UN entities, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and other implementing partners, with their focal points and telephone numbers\/email addresses; \n forums\/meetings and other coordination mechanisms where Joint Logistics Operations Centre (JLOC) participation is requested; \n requirement of office premises, office furniture, office equipment and related services, with locations; \n ground transport requirements \u2014 types and quantities; \n air transport requirements; \n communications requirements, including identity card machines; \n medical support requirements; \n number and location of various disarmament sites, camps, cantonments and other facilities; \n layout of each site, camp\/cantonment with specifications, including: \n\n camp\/site management structure with designations and responsibilities of officials; \n\n number and type of combatants, and their sex and age; \n\n number and type of all categories of staff, including NGOs\u2019 staff, expected in the camp; \n\n nature of activities to be conducted in the site\/camp and special requirements for rations storage, distribution of insertion benefits, etc.; \n\n security considerations and requirements; \n\n preferred type of construction; \n\n services\/amenities provided by NGOs; \n\n camp services to be provided by the mission, as well as any other specific requirements; \n\n dietary restrictions\/considerations; \n\n fire-fighting equipment; \n\n camp evacuation standard operating procedures; \n\n policy on employment of ex-combatants as labourers in camp construction.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -55200,14 +55200,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.3. DDR statement of requirements", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Some of the more important elements are listed below as a guideline: \\n estimated total number of ex-combatants, broken down according to sex, age, dis- ability or illness, parties\/groups and locations\/sectors; \\n estimated total number of weapons, broken down according to type of weap- on, ammunition, explosives, etc.", + "Sentence": "Some of the more important elements are listed below as a guideline: \n estimated total number of ex-combatants, broken down according to sex, age, dis- ability or illness, parties\/groups and locations\/sectors; \n estimated total number of weapons, broken down according to type of weap- on, ammunition, explosives, etc.", "newParagraph": "quality timeliness ddr logistic support peacekeeping mission depend quality timeliness information provided ddr planner manager logistics planner ddr programme manager need state logistic requirement fall direct managerial financial scope peacekeeping mission dpko addition logistic requirement submitted division administration early possible ensure timely logistic support important element listed guideline n estimated total number excombatants broken according sex age dis ability illness partiesgroups locationssectors n estimated total number weapon broken according type weap ammunition explosive etc n timelineoftheentireprogramme show ing startcompletion activity n allocation resource material service included assessed budget n name participating un entity nongovernmental organization ngo implementing partner focal point telephone numbersemail address n forumsmeetings coordination mechanism joint logistics operation centre jloc participation requested n requirement office premise office furniture office equipment related service location n ground transport requirement type quantity n air transport requirement n communication requirement including identity card machine n medical support requirement n number location various disarmament site camp cantonment facility n layout site campcantonment specification including nn campsite management structure designation responsibility official nn number type combatant sex age nn number type category staff including ngo staff expected camp nn nature activity conducted sitecamp special requirement ration storage distribution insertion benefit etc nn security consideration requirement nn preferred type construction nn servicesamenities provided ngo nn camp service provided mission well specific requirement nn dietary restrictionsconsiderations nn firefighting equipment nn camp evacuation standard operating procedure nn policy employment excombatants labourer camp construction", "ProcessedSent": "important element listed guideline n estimated total number excombatants broken according sex age dis ability illness partiesgroups locationssectors n estimated total number weapon broken according type weap ammunition explosive etc", "SentID": 3066 }, { "ParagraphID": 1010, - "Paragraph": "The quality and timeliness of DDR logistic support to a peacekeeping mission depend on the quality and timeliness of information provided by DDR planners and managers to logistics planners. DDR programme managers need to state the logistic requirements that fall under the direct managerial or financial scope of the peacekeeping mission and DPKO. In addition, the logistic requirements have to be submitted to the Division of Administration as early as possible to ensure timely logistic support. Some of the more important elements are listed below as a guideline: \\n estimated total number of ex-combatants, broken down according to sex, age, dis- ability or illness, parties\/groups and locations\/sectors; \\n estimated total number of weapons, broken down according to type of weap- on, ammunition, explosives, etc.; \\n time-lineoftheentireprogramme, show- ing start\/completion of activities; \\n allocation of resources, materials and services included in the assessed budget; \\n names of all participating UN entities, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and other implementing partners, with their focal points and telephone numbers\/email addresses; \\n forums\/meetings and other coordination mechanisms where Joint Logistics Operations Centre (JLOC) participation is requested; \\n requirement of office premises, office furniture, office equipment and related services, with locations; \\n ground transport requirements \u2014 types and quantities; \\n air transport requirements; \\n communications requirements, including identity card machines; \\n medical support requirements; \\n number and location of various disarmament sites, camps, cantonments and other facilities; \\n layout of each site, camp\/cantonment with specifications, including: \\n\\n camp\/site management structure with designations and responsibilities of officials; \\n\\n number and type of combatants, and their sex and age; \\n\\n number and type of all categories of staff, including NGOs\u2019 staff, expected in the camp; \\n\\n nature of activities to be conducted in the site\/camp and special requirements for rations storage, distribution of insertion benefits, etc.; \\n\\n security considerations and requirements; \\n\\n preferred type of construction; \\n\\n services\/amenities provided by NGOs; \\n\\n camp services to be provided by the mission, as well as any other specific requirements; \\n\\n dietary restrictions\/considerations; \\n\\n fire-fighting equipment; \\n\\n camp evacuation standard operating procedures; \\n\\n policy on employment of ex-combatants as labourers in camp construction.", + "Paragraph": "The quality and timeliness of DDR logistic support to a peacekeeping mission depend on the quality and timeliness of information provided by DDR planners and managers to logistics planners. DDR programme managers need to state the logistic requirements that fall under the direct managerial or financial scope of the peacekeeping mission and DPKO. In addition, the logistic requirements have to be submitted to the Division of Administration as early as possible to ensure timely logistic support. Some of the more important elements are listed below as a guideline: \n estimated total number of ex-combatants, broken down according to sex, age, dis- ability or illness, parties\/groups and locations\/sectors; \n estimated total number of weapons, broken down according to type of weap- on, ammunition, explosives, etc.; \n time-lineoftheentireprogramme, show- ing start\/completion of activities; \n allocation of resources, materials and services included in the assessed budget; \n names of all participating UN entities, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and other implementing partners, with their focal points and telephone numbers\/email addresses; \n forums\/meetings and other coordination mechanisms where Joint Logistics Operations Centre (JLOC) participation is requested; \n requirement of office premises, office furniture, office equipment and related services, with locations; \n ground transport requirements \u2014 types and quantities; \n air transport requirements; \n communications requirements, including identity card machines; \n medical support requirements; \n number and location of various disarmament sites, camps, cantonments and other facilities; \n layout of each site, camp\/cantonment with specifications, including: \n\n camp\/site management structure with designations and responsibilities of officials; \n\n number and type of combatants, and their sex and age; \n\n number and type of all categories of staff, including NGOs\u2019 staff, expected in the camp; \n\n nature of activities to be conducted in the site\/camp and special requirements for rations storage, distribution of insertion benefits, etc.; \n\n security considerations and requirements; \n\n preferred type of construction; \n\n services\/amenities provided by NGOs; \n\n camp services to be provided by the mission, as well as any other specific requirements; \n\n dietary restrictions\/considerations; \n\n fire-fighting equipment; \n\n camp evacuation standard operating procedures; \n\n policy on employment of ex-combatants as labourers in camp construction.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -55218,14 +55218,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.3. DDR statement of requirements", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "; \\n time-lineoftheentireprogramme, show- ing start\/completion of activities; \\n allocation of resources, materials and services included in the assessed budget; \\n names of all participating UN entities, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and other implementing partners, with their focal points and telephone numbers\/email addresses; \\n forums\/meetings and other coordination mechanisms where Joint Logistics Operations Centre (JLOC) participation is requested; \\n requirement of office premises, office furniture, office equipment and related services, with locations; \\n ground transport requirements \u2014 types and quantities; \\n air transport requirements; \\n communications requirements, including identity card machines; \\n medical support requirements; \\n number and location of various disarmament sites, camps, cantonments and other facilities; \\n layout of each site, camp\/cantonment with specifications, including: \\n\\n camp\/site management structure with designations and responsibilities of officials; \\n\\n number and type of combatants, and their sex and age; \\n\\n number and type of all categories of staff, including NGOs\u2019 staff, expected in the camp; \\n\\n nature of activities to be conducted in the site\/camp and special requirements for rations storage, distribution of insertion benefits, etc.", + "Sentence": "; \n time-lineoftheentireprogramme, show- ing start\/completion of activities; \n allocation of resources, materials and services included in the assessed budget; \n names of all participating UN entities, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and other implementing partners, with their focal points and telephone numbers\/email addresses; \n forums\/meetings and other coordination mechanisms where Joint Logistics Operations Centre (JLOC) participation is requested; \n requirement of office premises, office furniture, office equipment and related services, with locations; \n ground transport requirements \u2014 types and quantities; \n air transport requirements; \n communications requirements, including identity card machines; \n medical support requirements; \n number and location of various disarmament sites, camps, cantonments and other facilities; \n layout of each site, camp\/cantonment with specifications, including: \n\n camp\/site management structure with designations and responsibilities of officials; \n\n number and type of combatants, and their sex and age; \n\n number and type of all categories of staff, including NGOs\u2019 staff, expected in the camp; \n\n nature of activities to be conducted in the site\/camp and special requirements for rations storage, distribution of insertion benefits, etc.", "newParagraph": "quality timeliness ddr logistic support peacekeeping mission depend quality timeliness information provided ddr planner manager logistics planner ddr programme manager need state logistic requirement fall direct managerial financial scope peacekeeping mission dpko addition logistic requirement submitted division administration early possible ensure timely logistic support important element listed guideline n estimated total number excombatants broken according sex age dis ability illness partiesgroups locationssectors n estimated total number weapon broken according type weap ammunition explosive etc n timelineoftheentireprogramme show ing startcompletion activity n allocation resource material service included assessed budget n name participating un entity nongovernmental organization ngo implementing partner focal point telephone numbersemail address n forumsmeetings coordination mechanism joint logistics operation centre jloc participation requested n requirement office premise office furniture office equipment related service location n ground transport requirement type quantity n air transport requirement n communication requirement including identity card machine n medical support requirement n number location various disarmament site camp cantonment facility n layout site campcantonment specification including nn campsite management structure designation responsibility official nn number type combatant sex age nn number type category staff including ngo staff expected camp nn nature activity conducted sitecamp special requirement ration storage distribution insertion benefit etc nn security consideration requirement nn preferred type construction nn servicesamenities provided ngo nn camp service provided mission well specific requirement nn dietary restrictionsconsiderations nn firefighting equipment nn camp evacuation standard operating procedure nn policy employment excombatants labourer camp construction", "ProcessedSent": " n timelineoftheentireprogramme show ing startcompletion activity n allocation resource material service included assessed budget n name participating un entity nongovernmental organization ngo implementing partner focal point telephone numbersemail address n forumsmeetings coordination mechanism joint logistics operation centre jloc participation requested n requirement office premise office furniture office equipment related service location n ground transport requirement type quantity n air transport requirement n communication requirement including identity card machine n medical support requirement n number location various disarmament site camp cantonment facility n layout site campcantonment specification including nn campsite management structure designation responsibility official nn number type combatant sex age nn number type category staff including ngo staff expected camp nn nature activity conducted sitecamp special requirement ration storage distribution insertion benefit etc", "SentID": 3067 }, { "ParagraphID": 1010, - "Paragraph": "The quality and timeliness of DDR logistic support to a peacekeeping mission depend on the quality and timeliness of information provided by DDR planners and managers to logistics planners. DDR programme managers need to state the logistic requirements that fall under the direct managerial or financial scope of the peacekeeping mission and DPKO. In addition, the logistic requirements have to be submitted to the Division of Administration as early as possible to ensure timely logistic support. Some of the more important elements are listed below as a guideline: \\n estimated total number of ex-combatants, broken down according to sex, age, dis- ability or illness, parties\/groups and locations\/sectors; \\n estimated total number of weapons, broken down according to type of weap- on, ammunition, explosives, etc.; \\n time-lineoftheentireprogramme, show- ing start\/completion of activities; \\n allocation of resources, materials and services included in the assessed budget; \\n names of all participating UN entities, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and other implementing partners, with their focal points and telephone numbers\/email addresses; \\n forums\/meetings and other coordination mechanisms where Joint Logistics Operations Centre (JLOC) participation is requested; \\n requirement of office premises, office furniture, office equipment and related services, with locations; \\n ground transport requirements \u2014 types and quantities; \\n air transport requirements; \\n communications requirements, including identity card machines; \\n medical support requirements; \\n number and location of various disarmament sites, camps, cantonments and other facilities; \\n layout of each site, camp\/cantonment with specifications, including: \\n\\n camp\/site management structure with designations and responsibilities of officials; \\n\\n number and type of combatants, and their sex and age; \\n\\n number and type of all categories of staff, including NGOs\u2019 staff, expected in the camp; \\n\\n nature of activities to be conducted in the site\/camp and special requirements for rations storage, distribution of insertion benefits, etc.; \\n\\n security considerations and requirements; \\n\\n preferred type of construction; \\n\\n services\/amenities provided by NGOs; \\n\\n camp services to be provided by the mission, as well as any other specific requirements; \\n\\n dietary restrictions\/considerations; \\n\\n fire-fighting equipment; \\n\\n camp evacuation standard operating procedures; \\n\\n policy on employment of ex-combatants as labourers in camp construction.", + "Paragraph": "The quality and timeliness of DDR logistic support to a peacekeeping mission depend on the quality and timeliness of information provided by DDR planners and managers to logistics planners. DDR programme managers need to state the logistic requirements that fall under the direct managerial or financial scope of the peacekeeping mission and DPKO. In addition, the logistic requirements have to be submitted to the Division of Administration as early as possible to ensure timely logistic support. Some of the more important elements are listed below as a guideline: \n estimated total number of ex-combatants, broken down according to sex, age, dis- ability or illness, parties\/groups and locations\/sectors; \n estimated total number of weapons, broken down according to type of weap- on, ammunition, explosives, etc.; \n time-lineoftheentireprogramme, show- ing start\/completion of activities; \n allocation of resources, materials and services included in the assessed budget; \n names of all participating UN entities, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and other implementing partners, with their focal points and telephone numbers\/email addresses; \n forums\/meetings and other coordination mechanisms where Joint Logistics Operations Centre (JLOC) participation is requested; \n requirement of office premises, office furniture, office equipment and related services, with locations; \n ground transport requirements \u2014 types and quantities; \n air transport requirements; \n communications requirements, including identity card machines; \n medical support requirements; \n number and location of various disarmament sites, camps, cantonments and other facilities; \n layout of each site, camp\/cantonment with specifications, including: \n\n camp\/site management structure with designations and responsibilities of officials; \n\n number and type of combatants, and their sex and age; \n\n number and type of all categories of staff, including NGOs\u2019 staff, expected in the camp; \n\n nature of activities to be conducted in the site\/camp and special requirements for rations storage, distribution of insertion benefits, etc.; \n\n security considerations and requirements; \n\n preferred type of construction; \n\n services\/amenities provided by NGOs; \n\n camp services to be provided by the mission, as well as any other specific requirements; \n\n dietary restrictions\/considerations; \n\n fire-fighting equipment; \n\n camp evacuation standard operating procedures; \n\n policy on employment of ex-combatants as labourers in camp construction.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -55236,14 +55236,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.3. DDR statement of requirements", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "; \\n\\n security considerations and requirements; \\n\\n preferred type of construction; \\n\\n services\/amenities provided by NGOs; \\n\\n camp services to be provided by the mission, as well as any other specific requirements; \\n\\n dietary restrictions\/considerations; \\n\\n fire-fighting equipment; \\n\\n camp evacuation standard operating procedures; \\n\\n policy on employment of ex-combatants as labourers in camp construction.", + "Sentence": "; \n\n security considerations and requirements; \n\n preferred type of construction; \n\n services\/amenities provided by NGOs; \n\n camp services to be provided by the mission, as well as any other specific requirements; \n\n dietary restrictions\/considerations; \n\n fire-fighting equipment; \n\n camp evacuation standard operating procedures; \n\n policy on employment of ex-combatants as labourers in camp construction.", "newParagraph": "quality timeliness ddr logistic support peacekeeping mission depend quality timeliness information provided ddr planner manager logistics planner ddr programme manager need state logistic requirement fall direct managerial financial scope peacekeeping mission dpko addition logistic requirement submitted division administration early possible ensure timely logistic support important element listed guideline n estimated total number excombatants broken according sex age dis ability illness partiesgroups locationssectors n estimated total number weapon broken according type weap ammunition explosive etc n timelineoftheentireprogramme show ing startcompletion activity n allocation resource material service included assessed budget n name participating un entity nongovernmental organization ngo implementing partner focal point telephone numbersemail address n forumsmeetings coordination mechanism joint logistics operation centre jloc participation requested n requirement office premise office furniture office equipment related service location n ground transport requirement type quantity n air transport requirement n communication requirement including identity card machine n medical support requirement n number location various disarmament site camp cantonment facility n layout site campcantonment specification including nn campsite management structure designation responsibility official nn number type combatant sex age nn number type category staff including ngo staff expected camp nn nature activity conducted sitecamp special requirement ration storage distribution insertion benefit etc nn security consideration requirement nn preferred type construction nn servicesamenities provided ngo nn camp service provided mission well specific requirement nn dietary restrictionsconsiderations nn firefighting equipment nn camp evacuation standard operating procedure nn policy employment excombatants labourer camp construction", "ProcessedSent": " nn security consideration requirement nn preferred type construction nn servicesamenities provided ngo nn camp service provided mission well specific requirement nn dietary restrictionsconsiderations nn firefighting equipment nn camp evacuation standard operating procedure nn policy employment excombatants labourer camp construction", "SentID": 3068 }, { "ParagraphID": 1011, - "Paragraph": "For procurement funded from the mission budget (assessed contributions), DDR manag- ers must recognize and build into their planning estimates of the lead times for the acqui- sition of services and materials. Typical lead times for common equipment\/commodities, exclusive of processing and shipping time, are given below: \\n In principle, programme managers should attempt to get all logistic requirements for UN support to DDR funded out of the regular mission budget. Also, they should identify a (small) number of priority pieces of equipment and services that could be funded from voluntary contributions (which often have the ability to procure locally and with shorter lead times) on a reimbursable basis. The procurement of equipment and services in this way should be carried out according to the rules and regulations of individual agencies.", + "Paragraph": "For procurement funded from the mission budget (assessed contributions), DDR manag- ers must recognize and build into their planning estimates of the lead times for the acqui- sition of services and materials. Typical lead times for common equipment\/commodities, exclusive of processing and shipping time, are given below: \n In principle, programme managers should attempt to get all logistic requirements for UN support to DDR funded out of the regular mission budget. Also, they should identify a (small) number of priority pieces of equipment and services that could be funded from voluntary contributions (which often have the ability to procure locally and with shorter lead times) on a reimbursable basis. The procurement of equipment and services in this way should be carried out according to the rules and regulations of individual agencies.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -55261,7 +55261,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1011, - "Paragraph": "For procurement funded from the mission budget (assessed contributions), DDR manag- ers must recognize and build into their planning estimates of the lead times for the acqui- sition of services and materials. Typical lead times for common equipment\/commodities, exclusive of processing and shipping time, are given below: \\n In principle, programme managers should attempt to get all logistic requirements for UN support to DDR funded out of the regular mission budget. Also, they should identify a (small) number of priority pieces of equipment and services that could be funded from voluntary contributions (which often have the ability to procure locally and with shorter lead times) on a reimbursable basis. The procurement of equipment and services in this way should be carried out according to the rules and regulations of individual agencies.", + "Paragraph": "For procurement funded from the mission budget (assessed contributions), DDR manag- ers must recognize and build into their planning estimates of the lead times for the acqui- sition of services and materials. Typical lead times for common equipment\/commodities, exclusive of processing and shipping time, are given below: \n In principle, programme managers should attempt to get all logistic requirements for UN support to DDR funded out of the regular mission budget. Also, they should identify a (small) number of priority pieces of equipment and services that could be funded from voluntary contributions (which often have the ability to procure locally and with shorter lead times) on a reimbursable basis. The procurement of equipment and services in this way should be carried out according to the rules and regulations of individual agencies.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -55272,14 +55272,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.4. Long lead time items .", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Typical lead times for common equipment\/commodities, exclusive of processing and shipping time, are given below: \\n In principle, programme managers should attempt to get all logistic requirements for UN support to DDR funded out of the regular mission budget.", + "Sentence": "Typical lead times for common equipment\/commodities, exclusive of processing and shipping time, are given below: \n In principle, programme managers should attempt to get all logistic requirements for UN support to DDR funded out of the regular mission budget.", "newParagraph": "procurement funded mission budget assessed contribution ddr manag er must recognize build planning estimate lead time acqui sition service material typical lead time common equipmentcommodities exclusive processing shipping time given n principle programme manager attempt get logistic requirement un support ddr funded regular mission budget also identify small number priority piece equipment service could funded voluntary contribution often ability procure locally shorter lead time reimbursable basis procurement equipment service way carried according rule regulation individual agency", "ProcessedSent": "typical lead time common equipmentcommodities exclusive processing shipping time given n principle programme manager attempt get logistic requirement un support ddr funded regular mission budget", "SentID": 3070 }, { "ParagraphID": 1011, - "Paragraph": "For procurement funded from the mission budget (assessed contributions), DDR manag- ers must recognize and build into their planning estimates of the lead times for the acqui- sition of services and materials. Typical lead times for common equipment\/commodities, exclusive of processing and shipping time, are given below: \\n In principle, programme managers should attempt to get all logistic requirements for UN support to DDR funded out of the regular mission budget. Also, they should identify a (small) number of priority pieces of equipment and services that could be funded from voluntary contributions (which often have the ability to procure locally and with shorter lead times) on a reimbursable basis. The procurement of equipment and services in this way should be carried out according to the rules and regulations of individual agencies.", + "Paragraph": "For procurement funded from the mission budget (assessed contributions), DDR manag- ers must recognize and build into their planning estimates of the lead times for the acqui- sition of services and materials. Typical lead times for common equipment\/commodities, exclusive of processing and shipping time, are given below: \n In principle, programme managers should attempt to get all logistic requirements for UN support to DDR funded out of the regular mission budget. Also, they should identify a (small) number of priority pieces of equipment and services that could be funded from voluntary contributions (which often have the ability to procure locally and with shorter lead times) on a reimbursable basis. The procurement of equipment and services in this way should be carried out according to the rules and regulations of individual agencies.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -55297,7 +55297,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1011, - "Paragraph": "For procurement funded from the mission budget (assessed contributions), DDR manag- ers must recognize and build into their planning estimates of the lead times for the acqui- sition of services and materials. Typical lead times for common equipment\/commodities, exclusive of processing and shipping time, are given below: \\n In principle, programme managers should attempt to get all logistic requirements for UN support to DDR funded out of the regular mission budget. Also, they should identify a (small) number of priority pieces of equipment and services that could be funded from voluntary contributions (which often have the ability to procure locally and with shorter lead times) on a reimbursable basis. The procurement of equipment and services in this way should be carried out according to the rules and regulations of individual agencies.", + "Paragraph": "For procurement funded from the mission budget (assessed contributions), DDR manag- ers must recognize and build into their planning estimates of the lead times for the acqui- sition of services and materials. Typical lead times for common equipment\/commodities, exclusive of processing and shipping time, are given below: \n In principle, programme managers should attempt to get all logistic requirements for UN support to DDR funded out of the regular mission budget. Also, they should identify a (small) number of priority pieces of equipment and services that could be funded from voluntary contributions (which often have the ability to procure locally and with shorter lead times) on a reimbursable basis. The procurement of equipment and services in this way should be carried out according to the rules and regulations of individual agencies.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -55315,7 +55315,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1012, - "Paragraph": "The range of logistic support provided to a programme or activity will normally include a combination of UN civilian, commercial and military resources. Each of these elements has distinct advantages and disadvantages: \\n UN civilian support under direct UN control is easily adjusted to programme-specific requirements, and can operate in all but the most hostile environment; however, it takes time to assemble the required personnel and equipment, and to establish the necessary organization; \\n Commercial support comes fully staffed and equipped, but it takes time to put the appro- priate contractual arrangements in place, and commercial support cannot always be relied on to operate in hostile conditions; \\n Military support can operate in the most hostile environments, can be mobilized rela- tively quickly (depending on the troop-contributing country) and comes fully staffed and equipped. However, military support lacks continuity, because of the need to rotate personnel every 6\u201312 months. It can also be expensive.", + "Paragraph": "The range of logistic support provided to a programme or activity will normally include a combination of UN civilian, commercial and military resources. Each of these elements has distinct advantages and disadvantages: \n UN civilian support under direct UN control is easily adjusted to programme-specific requirements, and can operate in all but the most hostile environment; however, it takes time to assemble the required personnel and equipment, and to establish the necessary organization; \n Commercial support comes fully staffed and equipped, but it takes time to put the appro- priate contractual arrangements in place, and commercial support cannot always be relied on to operate in hostile conditions; \n Military support can operate in the most hostile environments, can be mobilized rela- tively quickly (depending on the troop-contributing country) and comes fully staffed and equipped. However, military support lacks continuity, because of the need to rotate personnel every 6\u201312 months. It can also be expensive.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -55333,7 +55333,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1012, - "Paragraph": "The range of logistic support provided to a programme or activity will normally include a combination of UN civilian, commercial and military resources. Each of these elements has distinct advantages and disadvantages: \\n UN civilian support under direct UN control is easily adjusted to programme-specific requirements, and can operate in all but the most hostile environment; however, it takes time to assemble the required personnel and equipment, and to establish the necessary organization; \\n Commercial support comes fully staffed and equipped, but it takes time to put the appro- priate contractual arrangements in place, and commercial support cannot always be relied on to operate in hostile conditions; \\n Military support can operate in the most hostile environments, can be mobilized rela- tively quickly (depending on the troop-contributing country) and comes fully staffed and equipped. However, military support lacks continuity, because of the need to rotate personnel every 6\u201312 months. It can also be expensive.", + "Paragraph": "The range of logistic support provided to a programme or activity will normally include a combination of UN civilian, commercial and military resources. Each of these elements has distinct advantages and disadvantages: \n UN civilian support under direct UN control is easily adjusted to programme-specific requirements, and can operate in all but the most hostile environment; however, it takes time to assemble the required personnel and equipment, and to establish the necessary organization; \n Commercial support comes fully staffed and equipped, but it takes time to put the appro- priate contractual arrangements in place, and commercial support cannot always be relied on to operate in hostile conditions; \n Military support can operate in the most hostile environments, can be mobilized rela- tively quickly (depending on the troop-contributing country) and comes fully staffed and equipped. However, military support lacks continuity, because of the need to rotate personnel every 6\u201312 months. It can also be expensive.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -55344,14 +55344,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.5. Options for the provision of logistic support for DDR activities .", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Each of these elements has distinct advantages and disadvantages: \\n UN civilian support under direct UN control is easily adjusted to programme-specific requirements, and can operate in all but the most hostile environment; however, it takes time to assemble the required personnel and equipment, and to establish the necessary organization; \\n Commercial support comes fully staffed and equipped, but it takes time to put the appro- priate contractual arrangements in place, and commercial support cannot always be relied on to operate in hostile conditions; \\n Military support can operate in the most hostile environments, can be mobilized rela- tively quickly (depending on the troop-contributing country) and comes fully staffed and equipped.", + "Sentence": "Each of these elements has distinct advantages and disadvantages: \n UN civilian support under direct UN control is easily adjusted to programme-specific requirements, and can operate in all but the most hostile environment; however, it takes time to assemble the required personnel and equipment, and to establish the necessary organization; \n Commercial support comes fully staffed and equipped, but it takes time to put the appro- priate contractual arrangements in place, and commercial support cannot always be relied on to operate in hostile conditions; \n Military support can operate in the most hostile environments, can be mobilized rela- tively quickly (depending on the troop-contributing country) and comes fully staffed and equipped.", "newParagraph": "range logistic support provided programme activity normally include combination un civilian commercial military resource element distinct advantage disadvantage n un civilian support direct un control easily adjusted programmespecific requirement operate hostile environment however take time assemble required personnel equipment establish necessary organization n commercial support come fully staffed equipped take time put appro priate contractual arrangement place commercial support cannot always relied operate hostile condition n military support operate hostile environment mobilized rela tively quickly depending troopcontributing country come fully staffed equipped however military support lack continuity need rotate personnel every 6 12 month also expensive", "ProcessedSent": "element distinct advantage disadvantage n un civilian support direct un control easily adjusted programmespecific requirement operate hostile environment however take time assemble required personnel equipment establish necessary organization n commercial support come fully staffed equipped take time put appro priate contractual arrangement place commercial support cannot always relied operate hostile condition n military support operate hostile environment mobilized rela tively quickly depending troopcontributing country come fully staffed equipped", "SentID": 3074 }, { "ParagraphID": 1012, - "Paragraph": "The range of logistic support provided to a programme or activity will normally include a combination of UN civilian, commercial and military resources. Each of these elements has distinct advantages and disadvantages: \\n UN civilian support under direct UN control is easily adjusted to programme-specific requirements, and can operate in all but the most hostile environment; however, it takes time to assemble the required personnel and equipment, and to establish the necessary organization; \\n Commercial support comes fully staffed and equipped, but it takes time to put the appro- priate contractual arrangements in place, and commercial support cannot always be relied on to operate in hostile conditions; \\n Military support can operate in the most hostile environments, can be mobilized rela- tively quickly (depending on the troop-contributing country) and comes fully staffed and equipped. However, military support lacks continuity, because of the need to rotate personnel every 6\u201312 months. It can also be expensive.", + "Paragraph": "The range of logistic support provided to a programme or activity will normally include a combination of UN civilian, commercial and military resources. Each of these elements has distinct advantages and disadvantages: \n UN civilian support under direct UN control is easily adjusted to programme-specific requirements, and can operate in all but the most hostile environment; however, it takes time to assemble the required personnel and equipment, and to establish the necessary organization; \n Commercial support comes fully staffed and equipped, but it takes time to put the appro- priate contractual arrangements in place, and commercial support cannot always be relied on to operate in hostile conditions; \n Military support can operate in the most hostile environments, can be mobilized rela- tively quickly (depending on the troop-contributing country) and comes fully staffed and equipped. However, military support lacks continuity, because of the need to rotate personnel every 6\u201312 months. It can also be expensive.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -55369,7 +55369,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1012, - "Paragraph": "The range of logistic support provided to a programme or activity will normally include a combination of UN civilian, commercial and military resources. Each of these elements has distinct advantages and disadvantages: \\n UN civilian support under direct UN control is easily adjusted to programme-specific requirements, and can operate in all but the most hostile environment; however, it takes time to assemble the required personnel and equipment, and to establish the necessary organization; \\n Commercial support comes fully staffed and equipped, but it takes time to put the appro- priate contractual arrangements in place, and commercial support cannot always be relied on to operate in hostile conditions; \\n Military support can operate in the most hostile environments, can be mobilized rela- tively quickly (depending on the troop-contributing country) and comes fully staffed and equipped. However, military support lacks continuity, because of the need to rotate personnel every 6\u201312 months. It can also be expensive.", + "Paragraph": "The range of logistic support provided to a programme or activity will normally include a combination of UN civilian, commercial and military resources. Each of these elements has distinct advantages and disadvantages: \n UN civilian support under direct UN control is easily adjusted to programme-specific requirements, and can operate in all but the most hostile environment; however, it takes time to assemble the required personnel and equipment, and to establish the necessary organization; \n Commercial support comes fully staffed and equipped, but it takes time to put the appro- priate contractual arrangements in place, and commercial support cannot always be relied on to operate in hostile conditions; \n Military support can operate in the most hostile environments, can be mobilized rela- tively quickly (depending on the troop-contributing country) and comes fully staffed and equipped. However, military support lacks continuity, because of the need to rotate personnel every 6\u201312 months. It can also be expensive.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -55585,7 +55585,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1018, - "Paragraph": "The DDR operational plan needs to describe what is needed to achieve its planned activities, as follows: \\n physical resources: space, supplies, equipment; \\n human resources: international, national (local, national professional officers), UN volunteers; \\n services; \\n supplies; \\n partnerships\/links with implementing partners; \\n time-lines.", + "Paragraph": "The DDR operational plan needs to describe what is needed to achieve its planned activities, as follows: \n physical resources: space, supplies, equipment; \n human resources: international, national (local, national professional officers), UN volunteers; \n services; \n supplies; \n partnerships\/links with implementing partners; \n time-lines.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -55596,7 +55596,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.6. Support management structures and processes", "Heading3": "6.6.3. Joint Logistics Operations Centre", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The DDR operational plan needs to describe what is needed to achieve its planned activities, as follows: \\n physical resources: space, supplies, equipment; \\n human resources: international, national (local, national professional officers), UN volunteers; \\n services; \\n supplies; \\n partnerships\/links with implementing partners; \\n time-lines.", + "Sentence": "The DDR operational plan needs to describe what is needed to achieve its planned activities, as follows: \n physical resources: space, supplies, equipment; \n human resources: international, national (local, national professional officers), UN volunteers; \n services; \n supplies; \n partnerships\/links with implementing partners; \n time-lines.", "newParagraph": "ddr operational plan need describe needed achieve planned activity follows n physical resource space supply equipment n human resource international national local national professional officer un volunteer n service n supply n partnershipslinks implementing partner n timeline", "ProcessedSent": "ddr operational plan need describe needed achieve planned activity follows n physical resource space supply equipment n human resource international national local national professional officer un volunteer n service n supply n partnershipslinks implementing partner n timeline", "SentID": 3088 @@ -55945,7 +55945,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1025, - "Paragraph": "The aim of this module is to provide DDR practitioners in Headquarters and the field, in peacekeeping missions as well as field-based UN agencies, funds and programmes with a good understanding of: \\n the major DDR activities that need to be considered and their associated cost; \\n the planning and budgetary framework used for DDR programming in a peacekeeping environment; \\n potential sources of funding for DDR programmes, relevant policies guiding their use and the key actors that play an important role in funding DDR programmes; \\n the financial mechanisms and frameworks used for DDR fund and programmes man- agement.", + "Paragraph": "The aim of this module is to provide DDR practitioners in Headquarters and the field, in peacekeeping missions as well as field-based UN agencies, funds and programmes with a good understanding of: \n the major DDR activities that need to be considered and their associated cost; \n the planning and budgetary framework used for DDR programming in a peacekeeping environment; \n potential sources of funding for DDR programmes, relevant policies guiding their use and the key actors that play an important role in funding DDR programmes; \n the financial mechanisms and frameworks used for DDR fund and programmes man- agement.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -55956,7 +55956,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The aim of this module is to provide DDR practitioners in Headquarters and the field, in peacekeeping missions as well as field-based UN agencies, funds and programmes with a good understanding of: \\n the major DDR activities that need to be considered and their associated cost; \\n the planning and budgetary framework used for DDR programming in a peacekeeping environment; \\n potential sources of funding for DDR programmes, relevant policies guiding their use and the key actors that play an important role in funding DDR programmes; \\n the financial mechanisms and frameworks used for DDR fund and programmes man- agement.", + "Sentence": "The aim of this module is to provide DDR practitioners in Headquarters and the field, in peacekeeping missions as well as field-based UN agencies, funds and programmes with a good understanding of: \n the major DDR activities that need to be considered and their associated cost; \n the planning and budgetary framework used for DDR programming in a peacekeeping environment; \n potential sources of funding for DDR programmes, relevant policies guiding their use and the key actors that play an important role in funding DDR programmes; \n the financial mechanisms and frameworks used for DDR fund and programmes man- agement.", "newParagraph": "aim module provide ddr practitioner headquarters field peacekeeping mission well fieldbased un agency fund programme good understanding n major ddr activity need considered associated cost n planning budgetary framework used ddr programming peacekeeping environment n potential source funding ddr programme relevant policy guiding use key actor play important role funding ddr programme n financial mechanism framework used ddr fund programme man agement", "ProcessedSent": "aim module provide ddr practitioner headquarters field peacekeeping mission well fieldbased un agency fund programme good understanding n major ddr activity need considered associated cost n planning budgetary framework used ddr programming peacekeeping environment n potential source funding ddr programme relevant policy guiding use key actor play important role funding ddr programme n financial mechanism framework used ddr fund programme man agement", "SentID": 3108 @@ -56107,7 +56107,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1029, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -56125,7 +56125,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1029, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -56136,14 +56136,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard.", + "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard.", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "ProcessedSent": "use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard", "SentID": 3118 }, { "ParagraphID": 1029, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -56154,14 +56154,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications.", + "Sentence": "\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications.", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "ProcessedSent": "n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification", "SentID": 3119 }, { "ParagraphID": 1029, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -56172,7 +56172,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Sentence": "\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "ProcessedSent": "n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "SentID": 3120 @@ -56269,7 +56269,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1031, - "Paragraph": "Programme managers should be aware that the reliance on multiple sources and mechanisms for funding DDR in a peacekeeping environment has several implications: \\n First, most programmes experience a gap of about a year from the time funds are pledged at a donors\u2019 conference to the time they are received. Payment may be further delayed if there is a lack of donor confidence in the peace process or in the implemen- tation of the peace agreement; \\n Second, the peacekeeping assessed budget is a predictable and reliable source of funding, but a lack of knowledge about what can or cannot be carried out with this source of funding, lack of clarity about the budgetary process and late submissions have all lim- ited the contributions of the peacekeeping assessed budget to the full DDR programme; \\n Third, the multiple funding sources have, on occasion, resulted in poorly planned and unsynchronized resource mobilization activities and unnecessary duplication of administrative structures. This has led to further confusion among DDR planners and implementers, diminished donor confidence in the DDR programme and, as a result, increased unwillingness to contribute the required funds.", + "Paragraph": "Programme managers should be aware that the reliance on multiple sources and mechanisms for funding DDR in a peacekeeping environment has several implications: \n First, most programmes experience a gap of about a year from the time funds are pledged at a donors\u2019 conference to the time they are received. Payment may be further delayed if there is a lack of donor confidence in the peace process or in the implemen- tation of the peace agreement; \n Second, the peacekeeping assessed budget is a predictable and reliable source of funding, but a lack of knowledge about what can or cannot be carried out with this source of funding, lack of clarity about the budgetary process and late submissions have all lim- ited the contributions of the peacekeeping assessed budget to the full DDR programme; \n Third, the multiple funding sources have, on occasion, resulted in poorly planned and unsynchronized resource mobilization activities and unnecessary duplication of administrative structures. This has led to further confusion among DDR planners and implementers, diminished donor confidence in the DDR programme and, as a result, increased unwillingness to contribute the required funds.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -56280,14 +56280,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Programme managers should be aware that the reliance on multiple sources and mechanisms for funding DDR in a peacekeeping environment has several implications: \\n First, most programmes experience a gap of about a year from the time funds are pledged at a donors\u2019 conference to the time they are received.", + "Sentence": "Programme managers should be aware that the reliance on multiple sources and mechanisms for funding DDR in a peacekeeping environment has several implications: \n First, most programmes experience a gap of about a year from the time funds are pledged at a donors\u2019 conference to the time they are received.", "newParagraph": "programme manager aware reliance multiple source mechanism funding ddr peacekeeping environment several implication n first programme experience gap year time fund pledged donor conference time received payment may delayed lack donor confidence peace process implemen tation peace agreement n second peacekeeping assessed budget predictable reliable source funding lack knowledge cannot carried source funding lack clarity budgetary process late submission lim ited contribution peacekeeping assessed budget full ddr programme n third multiple funding source occasion resulted poorly planned unsynchronized resource mobilization activity unnecessary duplication administrative structure led confusion among ddr planner implementers diminished donor confidence ddr programme result increased unwillingness contribute required fund", "ProcessedSent": "programme manager aware reliance multiple source mechanism funding ddr peacekeeping environment several implication n first programme experience gap year time fund pledged donor conference time received", "SentID": 3126 }, { "ParagraphID": 1031, - "Paragraph": "Programme managers should be aware that the reliance on multiple sources and mechanisms for funding DDR in a peacekeeping environment has several implications: \\n First, most programmes experience a gap of about a year from the time funds are pledged at a donors\u2019 conference to the time they are received. Payment may be further delayed if there is a lack of donor confidence in the peace process or in the implemen- tation of the peace agreement; \\n Second, the peacekeeping assessed budget is a predictable and reliable source of funding, but a lack of knowledge about what can or cannot be carried out with this source of funding, lack of clarity about the budgetary process and late submissions have all lim- ited the contributions of the peacekeeping assessed budget to the full DDR programme; \\n Third, the multiple funding sources have, on occasion, resulted in poorly planned and unsynchronized resource mobilization activities and unnecessary duplication of administrative structures. This has led to further confusion among DDR planners and implementers, diminished donor confidence in the DDR programme and, as a result, increased unwillingness to contribute the required funds.", + "Paragraph": "Programme managers should be aware that the reliance on multiple sources and mechanisms for funding DDR in a peacekeeping environment has several implications: \n First, most programmes experience a gap of about a year from the time funds are pledged at a donors\u2019 conference to the time they are received. Payment may be further delayed if there is a lack of donor confidence in the peace process or in the implemen- tation of the peace agreement; \n Second, the peacekeeping assessed budget is a predictable and reliable source of funding, but a lack of knowledge about what can or cannot be carried out with this source of funding, lack of clarity about the budgetary process and late submissions have all lim- ited the contributions of the peacekeeping assessed budget to the full DDR programme; \n Third, the multiple funding sources have, on occasion, resulted in poorly planned and unsynchronized resource mobilization activities and unnecessary duplication of administrative structures. This has led to further confusion among DDR planners and implementers, diminished donor confidence in the DDR programme and, as a result, increased unwillingness to contribute the required funds.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -56298,14 +56298,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Payment may be further delayed if there is a lack of donor confidence in the peace process or in the implemen- tation of the peace agreement; \\n Second, the peacekeeping assessed budget is a predictable and reliable source of funding, but a lack of knowledge about what can or cannot be carried out with this source of funding, lack of clarity about the budgetary process and late submissions have all lim- ited the contributions of the peacekeeping assessed budget to the full DDR programme; \\n Third, the multiple funding sources have, on occasion, resulted in poorly planned and unsynchronized resource mobilization activities and unnecessary duplication of administrative structures.", + "Sentence": "Payment may be further delayed if there is a lack of donor confidence in the peace process or in the implemen- tation of the peace agreement; \n Second, the peacekeeping assessed budget is a predictable and reliable source of funding, but a lack of knowledge about what can or cannot be carried out with this source of funding, lack of clarity about the budgetary process and late submissions have all lim- ited the contributions of the peacekeeping assessed budget to the full DDR programme; \n Third, the multiple funding sources have, on occasion, resulted in poorly planned and unsynchronized resource mobilization activities and unnecessary duplication of administrative structures.", "newParagraph": "programme manager aware reliance multiple source mechanism funding ddr peacekeeping environment several implication n first programme experience gap year time fund pledged donor conference time received payment may delayed lack donor confidence peace process implemen tation peace agreement n second peacekeeping assessed budget predictable reliable source funding lack knowledge cannot carried source funding lack clarity budgetary process late submission lim ited contribution peacekeeping assessed budget full ddr programme n third multiple funding source occasion resulted poorly planned unsynchronized resource mobilization activity unnecessary duplication administrative structure led confusion among ddr planner implementers diminished donor confidence ddr programme result increased unwillingness contribute required fund", "ProcessedSent": "payment may delayed lack donor confidence peace process implemen tation peace agreement n second peacekeeping assessed budget predictable reliable source funding lack knowledge cannot carried source funding lack clarity budgetary process late submission lim ited contribution peacekeeping assessed budget full ddr programme n third multiple funding source occasion resulted poorly planned unsynchronized resource mobilization activity unnecessary duplication administrative structure", "SentID": 3127 }, { "ParagraphID": 1031, - "Paragraph": "Programme managers should be aware that the reliance on multiple sources and mechanisms for funding DDR in a peacekeeping environment has several implications: \\n First, most programmes experience a gap of about a year from the time funds are pledged at a donors\u2019 conference to the time they are received. Payment may be further delayed if there is a lack of donor confidence in the peace process or in the implemen- tation of the peace agreement; \\n Second, the peacekeeping assessed budget is a predictable and reliable source of funding, but a lack of knowledge about what can or cannot be carried out with this source of funding, lack of clarity about the budgetary process and late submissions have all lim- ited the contributions of the peacekeeping assessed budget to the full DDR programme; \\n Third, the multiple funding sources have, on occasion, resulted in poorly planned and unsynchronized resource mobilization activities and unnecessary duplication of administrative structures. This has led to further confusion among DDR planners and implementers, diminished donor confidence in the DDR programme and, as a result, increased unwillingness to contribute the required funds.", + "Paragraph": "Programme managers should be aware that the reliance on multiple sources and mechanisms for funding DDR in a peacekeeping environment has several implications: \n First, most programmes experience a gap of about a year from the time funds are pledged at a donors\u2019 conference to the time they are received. Payment may be further delayed if there is a lack of donor confidence in the peace process or in the implemen- tation of the peace agreement; \n Second, the peacekeeping assessed budget is a predictable and reliable source of funding, but a lack of knowledge about what can or cannot be carried out with this source of funding, lack of clarity about the budgetary process and late submissions have all lim- ited the contributions of the peacekeeping assessed budget to the full DDR programme; \n Third, the multiple funding sources have, on occasion, resulted in poorly planned and unsynchronized resource mobilization activities and unnecessary duplication of administrative structures. This has led to further confusion among DDR planners and implementers, diminished donor confidence in the DDR programme and, as a result, increased unwillingness to contribute the required funds.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -56629,7 +56629,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1041, - "Paragraph": "Budgeting for DDR activities, using the peacekeeping assessed budget, must be guided by two elements: \\n The Secretary-General\u2019s DDR definitions: In May 2005, the Secretary-General standardized the DDR definitions to be used by all peacekeeping missions in their budget submissions, in his note to the General Assembly (A\/C.5\/59\/31); \\n General Assembly resolution A\/RES\/59\/296: Following the note of the Secretary-General on DDR definitions, the General Assembly in resolution A\/RES\/59\/296 recognized that a reinsertion period of one year is an integral part of the demobilization phase of the programme, and agreed to finance reinsertion activities for demobilized combatants for up to that period. (For the remaining text of resolution A\/RES\/59\/296, please see Annex C.)", + "Paragraph": "Budgeting for DDR activities, using the peacekeeping assessed budget, must be guided by two elements: \n The Secretary-General\u2019s DDR definitions: In May 2005, the Secretary-General standardized the DDR definitions to be used by all peacekeeping missions in their budget submissions, in his note to the General Assembly (A\/C.5\/59\/31); \n General Assembly resolution A\/RES\/59\/296: Following the note of the Secretary-General on DDR definitions, the General Assembly in resolution A\/RES\/59\/296 recognized that a reinsertion period of one year is an integral part of the demobilization phase of the programme, and agreed to finance reinsertion activities for demobilized combatants for up to that period. (For the remaining text of resolution A\/RES\/59\/296, please see Annex C.)", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -56640,14 +56640,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1. The peacekeeping assessed budget of the UN", "Heading3": "6.1.1. Elements of budgeting for DDR", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Budgeting for DDR activities, using the peacekeeping assessed budget, must be guided by two elements: \\n The Secretary-General\u2019s DDR definitions: In May 2005, the Secretary-General standardized the DDR definitions to be used by all peacekeeping missions in their budget submissions, in his note to the General Assembly (A\/C.5\/59\/31); \\n General Assembly resolution A\/RES\/59\/296: Following the note of the Secretary-General on DDR definitions, the General Assembly in resolution A\/RES\/59\/296 recognized that a reinsertion period of one year is an integral part of the demobilization phase of the programme, and agreed to finance reinsertion activities for demobilized combatants for up to that period.", + "Sentence": "Budgeting for DDR activities, using the peacekeeping assessed budget, must be guided by two elements: \n The Secretary-General\u2019s DDR definitions: In May 2005, the Secretary-General standardized the DDR definitions to be used by all peacekeeping missions in their budget submissions, in his note to the General Assembly (A\/C.5\/59\/31); \n General Assembly resolution A\/RES\/59\/296: Following the note of the Secretary-General on DDR definitions, the General Assembly in resolution A\/RES\/59\/296 recognized that a reinsertion period of one year is an integral part of the demobilization phase of the programme, and agreed to finance reinsertion activities for demobilized combatants for up to that period.", "newParagraph": "budgeting ddr activity using peacekeeping assessed budget must guided two element n secretarygeneral ddr definition may 2005 secretarygeneral standardized ddr definition used peacekeeping mission budget submission note general assembly ac55931 n general assembly resolution ares59296 following note secretarygeneral ddr definition general assembly resolution ares59296 recognized reinsertion period one year integral part demobilization phase programme agreed finance reinsertion activity demobilized combatant period remaining text resolution ares59296 please see annex c", "ProcessedSent": "budgeting ddr activity using peacekeeping assessed budget must guided two element n secretarygeneral ddr definition may 2005 secretarygeneral standardized ddr definition used peacekeeping mission budget submission note general assembly ac55931 n general assembly resolution ares59296 following note secretarygeneral ddr definition general assembly resolution ares59296 recognized reinsertion period one year integral part demobilization phase programme agreed finance reinsertion activity demobilized combatant period", "SentID": 3146 }, { "ParagraphID": 1041, - "Paragraph": "Budgeting for DDR activities, using the peacekeeping assessed budget, must be guided by two elements: \\n The Secretary-General\u2019s DDR definitions: In May 2005, the Secretary-General standardized the DDR definitions to be used by all peacekeeping missions in their budget submissions, in his note to the General Assembly (A\/C.5\/59\/31); \\n General Assembly resolution A\/RES\/59\/296: Following the note of the Secretary-General on DDR definitions, the General Assembly in resolution A\/RES\/59\/296 recognized that a reinsertion period of one year is an integral part of the demobilization phase of the programme, and agreed to finance reinsertion activities for demobilized combatants for up to that period. (For the remaining text of resolution A\/RES\/59\/296, please see Annex C.)", + "Paragraph": "Budgeting for DDR activities, using the peacekeeping assessed budget, must be guided by two elements: \n The Secretary-General\u2019s DDR definitions: In May 2005, the Secretary-General standardized the DDR definitions to be used by all peacekeeping missions in their budget submissions, in his note to the General Assembly (A\/C.5\/59\/31); \n General Assembly resolution A\/RES\/59\/296: Following the note of the Secretary-General on DDR definitions, the General Assembly in resolution A\/RES\/59\/296 recognized that a reinsertion period of one year is an integral part of the demobilization phase of the programme, and agreed to finance reinsertion activities for demobilized combatants for up to that period. (For the remaining text of resolution A\/RES\/59\/296, please see Annex C.)", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -56665,7 +56665,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1042, - "Paragraph": "DISARMAMENT \\n Disarmament is the collection, documentation, control and disposal of small arms, ammunition, explosives and light and heavy weapons of combatants and often also of the civilian population. It also includes the development of responsible arms management programmes. \\n\\n DEMOBILIZATION \\n Demobilization is the formal and controlled discharge of active combatants from armed forces or other armed groups. The first stage of demobilization may comprise the processing of individual combatants in temporary centres to the massing of troops in camps designated for this purpose (cantonment sites, encampments, assembly areas or barracks). The second stage of demobilization encompasses the support package provided to the demobilized, which is called reinsertion. \\n\\n REINSERTION \\n Reinsertion is the assistance offered to ex-combatants during demobilization but prior to the longer-term process of reintegration. Reinsertion is a form of transitional assistance to help cover the basic needs of ex-combatants and their families and can include transitional safety allowances, food, clothes, shelter, medical services, short-term education, training, employment and tools. While reintegration is a long-term, continuous social and economic process of development, reinsertion is a short-term material and\/ or financial assistance to meet immediate needs, and can last up to a year. \\n\\n REINTEGRATION \\n Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. It is essentially a social and economic process with an open time-frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.", + "Paragraph": "DISARMAMENT \n Disarmament is the collection, documentation, control and disposal of small arms, ammunition, explosives and light and heavy weapons of combatants and often also of the civilian population. It also includes the development of responsible arms management programmes. \n\n DEMOBILIZATION \n Demobilization is the formal and controlled discharge of active combatants from armed forces or other armed groups. The first stage of demobilization may comprise the processing of individual combatants in temporary centres to the massing of troops in camps designated for this purpose (cantonment sites, encampments, assembly areas or barracks). The second stage of demobilization encompasses the support package provided to the demobilized, which is called reinsertion. \n\n REINSERTION \n Reinsertion is the assistance offered to ex-combatants during demobilization but prior to the longer-term process of reintegration. Reinsertion is a form of transitional assistance to help cover the basic needs of ex-combatants and their families and can include transitional safety allowances, food, clothes, shelter, medical services, short-term education, training, employment and tools. While reintegration is a long-term, continuous social and economic process of development, reinsertion is a short-term material and\/ or financial assistance to meet immediate needs, and can last up to a year. \n\n REINTEGRATION \n Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. It is essentially a social and economic process with an open time-frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -56676,14 +56676,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1. The peacekeeping assessed budget of the UN", "Heading3": "6.1.1. Elements of budgeting for DDR", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "DISARMAMENT \\n Disarmament is the collection, documentation, control and disposal of small arms, ammunition, explosives and light and heavy weapons of combatants and often also of the civilian population.", + "Sentence": "DISARMAMENT \n Disarmament is the collection, documentation, control and disposal of small arms, ammunition, explosives and light and heavy weapons of combatants and often also of the civilian population.", "newParagraph": "disarmament n disarmament collection documentation control disposal small arm ammunition explosive light heavy weapon combatant often also civilian population also includes development responsible arm management programme nn demobilization n demobilization formal controlled discharge active combatant armed force armed group first stage demobilization may comprise processing individual combatant temporary centre massing troop camp designated purpose cantonment site encampment assembly area barrack second stage demobilization encompasses support package provided demobilized called reinsertion nn reinsertion n reinsertion assistance offered excombatants demobilization prior longerterm process reintegration reinsertion form transitional assistance help cover basic need excombatants family include transitional safety allowance food clothes shelter medical service shortterm education training employment tool reintegration longterm continuous social economic process development reinsertion shortterm material financial assistance meet immediate need last year nn reintegration n reintegration process excombatants acquire civilian status gain sustainable employment income essentially social economic process open timeframe primarily taking place community local level part general development country national responsibility often necessitates longterm external assistance", "ProcessedSent": "disarmament n disarmament collection documentation control disposal small arm ammunition explosive light heavy weapon combatant often also civilian population", "SentID": 3148 }, { "ParagraphID": 1042, - "Paragraph": "DISARMAMENT \\n Disarmament is the collection, documentation, control and disposal of small arms, ammunition, explosives and light and heavy weapons of combatants and often also of the civilian population. It also includes the development of responsible arms management programmes. \\n\\n DEMOBILIZATION \\n Demobilization is the formal and controlled discharge of active combatants from armed forces or other armed groups. The first stage of demobilization may comprise the processing of individual combatants in temporary centres to the massing of troops in camps designated for this purpose (cantonment sites, encampments, assembly areas or barracks). The second stage of demobilization encompasses the support package provided to the demobilized, which is called reinsertion. \\n\\n REINSERTION \\n Reinsertion is the assistance offered to ex-combatants during demobilization but prior to the longer-term process of reintegration. Reinsertion is a form of transitional assistance to help cover the basic needs of ex-combatants and their families and can include transitional safety allowances, food, clothes, shelter, medical services, short-term education, training, employment and tools. While reintegration is a long-term, continuous social and economic process of development, reinsertion is a short-term material and\/ or financial assistance to meet immediate needs, and can last up to a year. \\n\\n REINTEGRATION \\n Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. It is essentially a social and economic process with an open time-frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.", + "Paragraph": "DISARMAMENT \n Disarmament is the collection, documentation, control and disposal of small arms, ammunition, explosives and light and heavy weapons of combatants and often also of the civilian population. It also includes the development of responsible arms management programmes. \n\n DEMOBILIZATION \n Demobilization is the formal and controlled discharge of active combatants from armed forces or other armed groups. The first stage of demobilization may comprise the processing of individual combatants in temporary centres to the massing of troops in camps designated for this purpose (cantonment sites, encampments, assembly areas or barracks). The second stage of demobilization encompasses the support package provided to the demobilized, which is called reinsertion. \n\n REINSERTION \n Reinsertion is the assistance offered to ex-combatants during demobilization but prior to the longer-term process of reintegration. Reinsertion is a form of transitional assistance to help cover the basic needs of ex-combatants and their families and can include transitional safety allowances, food, clothes, shelter, medical services, short-term education, training, employment and tools. While reintegration is a long-term, continuous social and economic process of development, reinsertion is a short-term material and\/ or financial assistance to meet immediate needs, and can last up to a year. \n\n REINTEGRATION \n Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. It is essentially a social and economic process with an open time-frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -56701,7 +56701,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1042, - "Paragraph": "DISARMAMENT \\n Disarmament is the collection, documentation, control and disposal of small arms, ammunition, explosives and light and heavy weapons of combatants and often also of the civilian population. It also includes the development of responsible arms management programmes. \\n\\n DEMOBILIZATION \\n Demobilization is the formal and controlled discharge of active combatants from armed forces or other armed groups. The first stage of demobilization may comprise the processing of individual combatants in temporary centres to the massing of troops in camps designated for this purpose (cantonment sites, encampments, assembly areas or barracks). The second stage of demobilization encompasses the support package provided to the demobilized, which is called reinsertion. \\n\\n REINSERTION \\n Reinsertion is the assistance offered to ex-combatants during demobilization but prior to the longer-term process of reintegration. Reinsertion is a form of transitional assistance to help cover the basic needs of ex-combatants and their families and can include transitional safety allowances, food, clothes, shelter, medical services, short-term education, training, employment and tools. While reintegration is a long-term, continuous social and economic process of development, reinsertion is a short-term material and\/ or financial assistance to meet immediate needs, and can last up to a year. \\n\\n REINTEGRATION \\n Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. It is essentially a social and economic process with an open time-frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.", + "Paragraph": "DISARMAMENT \n Disarmament is the collection, documentation, control and disposal of small arms, ammunition, explosives and light and heavy weapons of combatants and often also of the civilian population. It also includes the development of responsible arms management programmes. \n\n DEMOBILIZATION \n Demobilization is the formal and controlled discharge of active combatants from armed forces or other armed groups. The first stage of demobilization may comprise the processing of individual combatants in temporary centres to the massing of troops in camps designated for this purpose (cantonment sites, encampments, assembly areas or barracks). The second stage of demobilization encompasses the support package provided to the demobilized, which is called reinsertion. \n\n REINSERTION \n Reinsertion is the assistance offered to ex-combatants during demobilization but prior to the longer-term process of reintegration. Reinsertion is a form of transitional assistance to help cover the basic needs of ex-combatants and their families and can include transitional safety allowances, food, clothes, shelter, medical services, short-term education, training, employment and tools. While reintegration is a long-term, continuous social and economic process of development, reinsertion is a short-term material and\/ or financial assistance to meet immediate needs, and can last up to a year. \n\n REINTEGRATION \n Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. It is essentially a social and economic process with an open time-frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -56712,14 +56712,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1. The peacekeeping assessed budget of the UN", "Heading3": "6.1.1. Elements of budgeting for DDR", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n DEMOBILIZATION \\n Demobilization is the formal and controlled discharge of active combatants from armed forces or other armed groups.", + "Sentence": "\n\n DEMOBILIZATION \n Demobilization is the formal and controlled discharge of active combatants from armed forces or other armed groups.", "newParagraph": "disarmament n disarmament collection documentation control disposal small arm ammunition explosive light heavy weapon combatant often also civilian population also includes development responsible arm management programme nn demobilization n demobilization formal controlled discharge active combatant armed force armed group first stage demobilization may comprise processing individual combatant temporary centre massing troop camp designated purpose cantonment site encampment assembly area barrack second stage demobilization encompasses support package provided demobilized called reinsertion nn reinsertion n reinsertion assistance offered excombatants demobilization prior longerterm process reintegration reinsertion form transitional assistance help cover basic need excombatants family include transitional safety allowance food clothes shelter medical service shortterm education training employment tool reintegration longterm continuous social economic process development reinsertion shortterm material financial assistance meet immediate need last year nn reintegration n reintegration process excombatants acquire civilian status gain sustainable employment income essentially social economic process open timeframe primarily taking place community local level part general development country national responsibility often necessitates longterm external assistance", "ProcessedSent": "nn demobilization n demobilization formal controlled discharge active combatant armed force armed group", "SentID": 3150 }, { "ParagraphID": 1042, - "Paragraph": "DISARMAMENT \\n Disarmament is the collection, documentation, control and disposal of small arms, ammunition, explosives and light and heavy weapons of combatants and often also of the civilian population. It also includes the development of responsible arms management programmes. \\n\\n DEMOBILIZATION \\n Demobilization is the formal and controlled discharge of active combatants from armed forces or other armed groups. The first stage of demobilization may comprise the processing of individual combatants in temporary centres to the massing of troops in camps designated for this purpose (cantonment sites, encampments, assembly areas or barracks). The second stage of demobilization encompasses the support package provided to the demobilized, which is called reinsertion. \\n\\n REINSERTION \\n Reinsertion is the assistance offered to ex-combatants during demobilization but prior to the longer-term process of reintegration. Reinsertion is a form of transitional assistance to help cover the basic needs of ex-combatants and their families and can include transitional safety allowances, food, clothes, shelter, medical services, short-term education, training, employment and tools. While reintegration is a long-term, continuous social and economic process of development, reinsertion is a short-term material and\/ or financial assistance to meet immediate needs, and can last up to a year. \\n\\n REINTEGRATION \\n Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. It is essentially a social and economic process with an open time-frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.", + "Paragraph": "DISARMAMENT \n Disarmament is the collection, documentation, control and disposal of small arms, ammunition, explosives and light and heavy weapons of combatants and often also of the civilian population. It also includes the development of responsible arms management programmes. \n\n DEMOBILIZATION \n Demobilization is the formal and controlled discharge of active combatants from armed forces or other armed groups. The first stage of demobilization may comprise the processing of individual combatants in temporary centres to the massing of troops in camps designated for this purpose (cantonment sites, encampments, assembly areas or barracks). The second stage of demobilization encompasses the support package provided to the demobilized, which is called reinsertion. \n\n REINSERTION \n Reinsertion is the assistance offered to ex-combatants during demobilization but prior to the longer-term process of reintegration. Reinsertion is a form of transitional assistance to help cover the basic needs of ex-combatants and their families and can include transitional safety allowances, food, clothes, shelter, medical services, short-term education, training, employment and tools. While reintegration is a long-term, continuous social and economic process of development, reinsertion is a short-term material and\/ or financial assistance to meet immediate needs, and can last up to a year. \n\n REINTEGRATION \n Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. It is essentially a social and economic process with an open time-frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -56737,7 +56737,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1042, - "Paragraph": "DISARMAMENT \\n Disarmament is the collection, documentation, control and disposal of small arms, ammunition, explosives and light and heavy weapons of combatants and often also of the civilian population. It also includes the development of responsible arms management programmes. \\n\\n DEMOBILIZATION \\n Demobilization is the formal and controlled discharge of active combatants from armed forces or other armed groups. The first stage of demobilization may comprise the processing of individual combatants in temporary centres to the massing of troops in camps designated for this purpose (cantonment sites, encampments, assembly areas or barracks). The second stage of demobilization encompasses the support package provided to the demobilized, which is called reinsertion. \\n\\n REINSERTION \\n Reinsertion is the assistance offered to ex-combatants during demobilization but prior to the longer-term process of reintegration. Reinsertion is a form of transitional assistance to help cover the basic needs of ex-combatants and their families and can include transitional safety allowances, food, clothes, shelter, medical services, short-term education, training, employment and tools. While reintegration is a long-term, continuous social and economic process of development, reinsertion is a short-term material and\/ or financial assistance to meet immediate needs, and can last up to a year. \\n\\n REINTEGRATION \\n Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. It is essentially a social and economic process with an open time-frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.", + "Paragraph": "DISARMAMENT \n Disarmament is the collection, documentation, control and disposal of small arms, ammunition, explosives and light and heavy weapons of combatants and often also of the civilian population. It also includes the development of responsible arms management programmes. \n\n DEMOBILIZATION \n Demobilization is the formal and controlled discharge of active combatants from armed forces or other armed groups. The first stage of demobilization may comprise the processing of individual combatants in temporary centres to the massing of troops in camps designated for this purpose (cantonment sites, encampments, assembly areas or barracks). The second stage of demobilization encompasses the support package provided to the demobilized, which is called reinsertion. \n\n REINSERTION \n Reinsertion is the assistance offered to ex-combatants during demobilization but prior to the longer-term process of reintegration. Reinsertion is a form of transitional assistance to help cover the basic needs of ex-combatants and their families and can include transitional safety allowances, food, clothes, shelter, medical services, short-term education, training, employment and tools. While reintegration is a long-term, continuous social and economic process of development, reinsertion is a short-term material and\/ or financial assistance to meet immediate needs, and can last up to a year. \n\n REINTEGRATION \n Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. It is essentially a social and economic process with an open time-frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -56755,7 +56755,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1042, - "Paragraph": "DISARMAMENT \\n Disarmament is the collection, documentation, control and disposal of small arms, ammunition, explosives and light and heavy weapons of combatants and often also of the civilian population. It also includes the development of responsible arms management programmes. \\n\\n DEMOBILIZATION \\n Demobilization is the formal and controlled discharge of active combatants from armed forces or other armed groups. The first stage of demobilization may comprise the processing of individual combatants in temporary centres to the massing of troops in camps designated for this purpose (cantonment sites, encampments, assembly areas or barracks). The second stage of demobilization encompasses the support package provided to the demobilized, which is called reinsertion. \\n\\n REINSERTION \\n Reinsertion is the assistance offered to ex-combatants during demobilization but prior to the longer-term process of reintegration. Reinsertion is a form of transitional assistance to help cover the basic needs of ex-combatants and their families and can include transitional safety allowances, food, clothes, shelter, medical services, short-term education, training, employment and tools. While reintegration is a long-term, continuous social and economic process of development, reinsertion is a short-term material and\/ or financial assistance to meet immediate needs, and can last up to a year. \\n\\n REINTEGRATION \\n Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. It is essentially a social and economic process with an open time-frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.", + "Paragraph": "DISARMAMENT \n Disarmament is the collection, documentation, control and disposal of small arms, ammunition, explosives and light and heavy weapons of combatants and often also of the civilian population. It also includes the development of responsible arms management programmes. \n\n DEMOBILIZATION \n Demobilization is the formal and controlled discharge of active combatants from armed forces or other armed groups. The first stage of demobilization may comprise the processing of individual combatants in temporary centres to the massing of troops in camps designated for this purpose (cantonment sites, encampments, assembly areas or barracks). The second stage of demobilization encompasses the support package provided to the demobilized, which is called reinsertion. \n\n REINSERTION \n Reinsertion is the assistance offered to ex-combatants during demobilization but prior to the longer-term process of reintegration. Reinsertion is a form of transitional assistance to help cover the basic needs of ex-combatants and their families and can include transitional safety allowances, food, clothes, shelter, medical services, short-term education, training, employment and tools. While reintegration is a long-term, continuous social and economic process of development, reinsertion is a short-term material and\/ or financial assistance to meet immediate needs, and can last up to a year. \n\n REINTEGRATION \n Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. It is essentially a social and economic process with an open time-frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -56766,14 +56766,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1. The peacekeeping assessed budget of the UN", "Heading3": "6.1.1. Elements of budgeting for DDR", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n REINSERTION \\n Reinsertion is the assistance offered to ex-combatants during demobilization but prior to the longer-term process of reintegration.", + "Sentence": "\n\n REINSERTION \n Reinsertion is the assistance offered to ex-combatants during demobilization but prior to the longer-term process of reintegration.", "newParagraph": "disarmament n disarmament collection documentation control disposal small arm ammunition explosive light heavy weapon combatant often also civilian population also includes development responsible arm management programme nn demobilization n demobilization formal controlled discharge active combatant armed force armed group first stage demobilization may comprise processing individual combatant temporary centre massing troop camp designated purpose cantonment site encampment assembly area barrack second stage demobilization encompasses support package provided demobilized called reinsertion nn reinsertion n reinsertion assistance offered excombatants demobilization prior longerterm process reintegration reinsertion form transitional assistance help cover basic need excombatants family include transitional safety allowance food clothes shelter medical service shortterm education training employment tool reintegration longterm continuous social economic process development reinsertion shortterm material financial assistance meet immediate need last year nn reintegration n reintegration process excombatants acquire civilian status gain sustainable employment income essentially social economic process open timeframe primarily taking place community local level part general development country national responsibility often necessitates longterm external assistance", "ProcessedSent": "nn reinsertion n reinsertion assistance offered excombatants demobilization prior longerterm process reintegration", "SentID": 3153 }, { "ParagraphID": 1042, - "Paragraph": "DISARMAMENT \\n Disarmament is the collection, documentation, control and disposal of small arms, ammunition, explosives and light and heavy weapons of combatants and often also of the civilian population. It also includes the development of responsible arms management programmes. \\n\\n DEMOBILIZATION \\n Demobilization is the formal and controlled discharge of active combatants from armed forces or other armed groups. The first stage of demobilization may comprise the processing of individual combatants in temporary centres to the massing of troops in camps designated for this purpose (cantonment sites, encampments, assembly areas or barracks). The second stage of demobilization encompasses the support package provided to the demobilized, which is called reinsertion. \\n\\n REINSERTION \\n Reinsertion is the assistance offered to ex-combatants during demobilization but prior to the longer-term process of reintegration. Reinsertion is a form of transitional assistance to help cover the basic needs of ex-combatants and their families and can include transitional safety allowances, food, clothes, shelter, medical services, short-term education, training, employment and tools. While reintegration is a long-term, continuous social and economic process of development, reinsertion is a short-term material and\/ or financial assistance to meet immediate needs, and can last up to a year. \\n\\n REINTEGRATION \\n Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. It is essentially a social and economic process with an open time-frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.", + "Paragraph": "DISARMAMENT \n Disarmament is the collection, documentation, control and disposal of small arms, ammunition, explosives and light and heavy weapons of combatants and often also of the civilian population. It also includes the development of responsible arms management programmes. \n\n DEMOBILIZATION \n Demobilization is the formal and controlled discharge of active combatants from armed forces or other armed groups. The first stage of demobilization may comprise the processing of individual combatants in temporary centres to the massing of troops in camps designated for this purpose (cantonment sites, encampments, assembly areas or barracks). The second stage of demobilization encompasses the support package provided to the demobilized, which is called reinsertion. \n\n REINSERTION \n Reinsertion is the assistance offered to ex-combatants during demobilization but prior to the longer-term process of reintegration. Reinsertion is a form of transitional assistance to help cover the basic needs of ex-combatants and their families and can include transitional safety allowances, food, clothes, shelter, medical services, short-term education, training, employment and tools. While reintegration is a long-term, continuous social and economic process of development, reinsertion is a short-term material and\/ or financial assistance to meet immediate needs, and can last up to a year. \n\n REINTEGRATION \n Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. It is essentially a social and economic process with an open time-frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -56791,7 +56791,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1042, - "Paragraph": "DISARMAMENT \\n Disarmament is the collection, documentation, control and disposal of small arms, ammunition, explosives and light and heavy weapons of combatants and often also of the civilian population. It also includes the development of responsible arms management programmes. \\n\\n DEMOBILIZATION \\n Demobilization is the formal and controlled discharge of active combatants from armed forces or other armed groups. The first stage of demobilization may comprise the processing of individual combatants in temporary centres to the massing of troops in camps designated for this purpose (cantonment sites, encampments, assembly areas or barracks). The second stage of demobilization encompasses the support package provided to the demobilized, which is called reinsertion. \\n\\n REINSERTION \\n Reinsertion is the assistance offered to ex-combatants during demobilization but prior to the longer-term process of reintegration. Reinsertion is a form of transitional assistance to help cover the basic needs of ex-combatants and their families and can include transitional safety allowances, food, clothes, shelter, medical services, short-term education, training, employment and tools. While reintegration is a long-term, continuous social and economic process of development, reinsertion is a short-term material and\/ or financial assistance to meet immediate needs, and can last up to a year. \\n\\n REINTEGRATION \\n Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. It is essentially a social and economic process with an open time-frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.", + "Paragraph": "DISARMAMENT \n Disarmament is the collection, documentation, control and disposal of small arms, ammunition, explosives and light and heavy weapons of combatants and often also of the civilian population. It also includes the development of responsible arms management programmes. \n\n DEMOBILIZATION \n Demobilization is the formal and controlled discharge of active combatants from armed forces or other armed groups. The first stage of demobilization may comprise the processing of individual combatants in temporary centres to the massing of troops in camps designated for this purpose (cantonment sites, encampments, assembly areas or barracks). The second stage of demobilization encompasses the support package provided to the demobilized, which is called reinsertion. \n\n REINSERTION \n Reinsertion is the assistance offered to ex-combatants during demobilization but prior to the longer-term process of reintegration. Reinsertion is a form of transitional assistance to help cover the basic needs of ex-combatants and their families and can include transitional safety allowances, food, clothes, shelter, medical services, short-term education, training, employment and tools. While reintegration is a long-term, continuous social and economic process of development, reinsertion is a short-term material and\/ or financial assistance to meet immediate needs, and can last up to a year. \n\n REINTEGRATION \n Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. It is essentially a social and economic process with an open time-frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -56809,7 +56809,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1042, - "Paragraph": "DISARMAMENT \\n Disarmament is the collection, documentation, control and disposal of small arms, ammunition, explosives and light and heavy weapons of combatants and often also of the civilian population. It also includes the development of responsible arms management programmes. \\n\\n DEMOBILIZATION \\n Demobilization is the formal and controlled discharge of active combatants from armed forces or other armed groups. The first stage of demobilization may comprise the processing of individual combatants in temporary centres to the massing of troops in camps designated for this purpose (cantonment sites, encampments, assembly areas or barracks). The second stage of demobilization encompasses the support package provided to the demobilized, which is called reinsertion. \\n\\n REINSERTION \\n Reinsertion is the assistance offered to ex-combatants during demobilization but prior to the longer-term process of reintegration. Reinsertion is a form of transitional assistance to help cover the basic needs of ex-combatants and their families and can include transitional safety allowances, food, clothes, shelter, medical services, short-term education, training, employment and tools. While reintegration is a long-term, continuous social and economic process of development, reinsertion is a short-term material and\/ or financial assistance to meet immediate needs, and can last up to a year. \\n\\n REINTEGRATION \\n Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. It is essentially a social and economic process with an open time-frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.", + "Paragraph": "DISARMAMENT \n Disarmament is the collection, documentation, control and disposal of small arms, ammunition, explosives and light and heavy weapons of combatants and often also of the civilian population. It also includes the development of responsible arms management programmes. \n\n DEMOBILIZATION \n Demobilization is the formal and controlled discharge of active combatants from armed forces or other armed groups. The first stage of demobilization may comprise the processing of individual combatants in temporary centres to the massing of troops in camps designated for this purpose (cantonment sites, encampments, assembly areas or barracks). The second stage of demobilization encompasses the support package provided to the demobilized, which is called reinsertion. \n\n REINSERTION \n Reinsertion is the assistance offered to ex-combatants during demobilization but prior to the longer-term process of reintegration. Reinsertion is a form of transitional assistance to help cover the basic needs of ex-combatants and their families and can include transitional safety allowances, food, clothes, shelter, medical services, short-term education, training, employment and tools. While reintegration is a long-term, continuous social and economic process of development, reinsertion is a short-term material and\/ or financial assistance to meet immediate needs, and can last up to a year. \n\n REINTEGRATION \n Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. It is essentially a social and economic process with an open time-frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -56820,14 +56820,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1. The peacekeeping assessed budget of the UN", "Heading3": "6.1.1. Elements of budgeting for DDR", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n REINTEGRATION \\n Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income.", + "Sentence": "\n\n REINTEGRATION \n Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income.", "newParagraph": "disarmament n disarmament collection documentation control disposal small arm ammunition explosive light heavy weapon combatant often also civilian population also includes development responsible arm management programme nn demobilization n demobilization formal controlled discharge active combatant armed force armed group first stage demobilization may comprise processing individual combatant temporary centre massing troop camp designated purpose cantonment site encampment assembly area barrack second stage demobilization encompasses support package provided demobilized called reinsertion nn reinsertion n reinsertion assistance offered excombatants demobilization prior longerterm process reintegration reinsertion form transitional assistance help cover basic need excombatants family include transitional safety allowance food clothes shelter medical service shortterm education training employment tool reintegration longterm continuous social economic process development reinsertion shortterm material financial assistance meet immediate need last year nn reintegration n reintegration process excombatants acquire civilian status gain sustainable employment income essentially social economic process open timeframe primarily taking place community local level part general development country national responsibility often necessitates longterm external assistance", "ProcessedSent": "nn reintegration n reintegration process excombatants acquire civilian status gain sustainable employment income", "SentID": 3156 }, { "ParagraphID": 1042, - "Paragraph": "DISARMAMENT \\n Disarmament is the collection, documentation, control and disposal of small arms, ammunition, explosives and light and heavy weapons of combatants and often also of the civilian population. It also includes the development of responsible arms management programmes. \\n\\n DEMOBILIZATION \\n Demobilization is the formal and controlled discharge of active combatants from armed forces or other armed groups. The first stage of demobilization may comprise the processing of individual combatants in temporary centres to the massing of troops in camps designated for this purpose (cantonment sites, encampments, assembly areas or barracks). The second stage of demobilization encompasses the support package provided to the demobilized, which is called reinsertion. \\n\\n REINSERTION \\n Reinsertion is the assistance offered to ex-combatants during demobilization but prior to the longer-term process of reintegration. Reinsertion is a form of transitional assistance to help cover the basic needs of ex-combatants and their families and can include transitional safety allowances, food, clothes, shelter, medical services, short-term education, training, employment and tools. While reintegration is a long-term, continuous social and economic process of development, reinsertion is a short-term material and\/ or financial assistance to meet immediate needs, and can last up to a year. \\n\\n REINTEGRATION \\n Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. It is essentially a social and economic process with an open time-frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.", + "Paragraph": "DISARMAMENT \n Disarmament is the collection, documentation, control and disposal of small arms, ammunition, explosives and light and heavy weapons of combatants and often also of the civilian population. It also includes the development of responsible arms management programmes. \n\n DEMOBILIZATION \n Demobilization is the formal and controlled discharge of active combatants from armed forces or other armed groups. The first stage of demobilization may comprise the processing of individual combatants in temporary centres to the massing of troops in camps designated for this purpose (cantonment sites, encampments, assembly areas or barracks). The second stage of demobilization encompasses the support package provided to the demobilized, which is called reinsertion. \n\n REINSERTION \n Reinsertion is the assistance offered to ex-combatants during demobilization but prior to the longer-term process of reintegration. Reinsertion is a form of transitional assistance to help cover the basic needs of ex-combatants and their families and can include transitional safety allowances, food, clothes, shelter, medical services, short-term education, training, employment and tools. While reintegration is a long-term, continuous social and economic process of development, reinsertion is a short-term material and\/ or financial assistance to meet immediate needs, and can last up to a year. \n\n REINTEGRATION \n Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. It is essentially a social and economic process with an open time-frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -56845,7 +56845,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1042, - "Paragraph": "DISARMAMENT \\n Disarmament is the collection, documentation, control and disposal of small arms, ammunition, explosives and light and heavy weapons of combatants and often also of the civilian population. It also includes the development of responsible arms management programmes. \\n\\n DEMOBILIZATION \\n Demobilization is the formal and controlled discharge of active combatants from armed forces or other armed groups. The first stage of demobilization may comprise the processing of individual combatants in temporary centres to the massing of troops in camps designated for this purpose (cantonment sites, encampments, assembly areas or barracks). The second stage of demobilization encompasses the support package provided to the demobilized, which is called reinsertion. \\n\\n REINSERTION \\n Reinsertion is the assistance offered to ex-combatants during demobilization but prior to the longer-term process of reintegration. Reinsertion is a form of transitional assistance to help cover the basic needs of ex-combatants and their families and can include transitional safety allowances, food, clothes, shelter, medical services, short-term education, training, employment and tools. While reintegration is a long-term, continuous social and economic process of development, reinsertion is a short-term material and\/ or financial assistance to meet immediate needs, and can last up to a year. \\n\\n REINTEGRATION \\n Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. It is essentially a social and economic process with an open time-frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.", + "Paragraph": "DISARMAMENT \n Disarmament is the collection, documentation, control and disposal of small arms, ammunition, explosives and light and heavy weapons of combatants and often also of the civilian population. It also includes the development of responsible arms management programmes. \n\n DEMOBILIZATION \n Demobilization is the formal and controlled discharge of active combatants from armed forces or other armed groups. The first stage of demobilization may comprise the processing of individual combatants in temporary centres to the massing of troops in camps designated for this purpose (cantonment sites, encampments, assembly areas or barracks). The second stage of demobilization encompasses the support package provided to the demobilized, which is called reinsertion. \n\n REINSERTION \n Reinsertion is the assistance offered to ex-combatants during demobilization but prior to the longer-term process of reintegration. Reinsertion is a form of transitional assistance to help cover the basic needs of ex-combatants and their families and can include transitional safety allowances, food, clothes, shelter, medical services, short-term education, training, employment and tools. While reintegration is a long-term, continuous social and economic process of development, reinsertion is a short-term material and\/ or financial assistance to meet immediate needs, and can last up to a year. \n\n REINTEGRATION \n Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. It is essentially a social and economic process with an open time-frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility and often necessitates long-term external assistance.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -56953,7 +56953,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1046, - "Paragraph": "In general, five funding sources are used to finance DDR activities. These are: \\n the peacekeeping assessed budget of the UN; \\n rapid response (emergency) funds; voluntary contributions from donors; \\n government grants, government loans and credits; \\n agency cost-sharing.", + "Paragraph": "In general, five funding sources are used to finance DDR activities. These are: \n the peacekeeping assessed budget of the UN; \n rapid response (emergency) funds; voluntary contributions from donors; \n government grants, government loans and credits; \n agency cost-sharing.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -56971,7 +56971,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1046, - "Paragraph": "In general, five funding sources are used to finance DDR activities. These are: \\n the peacekeeping assessed budget of the UN; \\n rapid response (emergency) funds; voluntary contributions from donors; \\n government grants, government loans and credits; \\n agency cost-sharing.", + "Paragraph": "In general, five funding sources are used to finance DDR activities. These are: \n the peacekeeping assessed budget of the UN; \n rapid response (emergency) funds; voluntary contributions from donors; \n government grants, government loans and credits; \n agency cost-sharing.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -56982,7 +56982,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "These are: \\n the peacekeeping assessed budget of the UN; \\n rapid response (emergency) funds; voluntary contributions from donors; \\n government grants, government loans and credits; \\n agency cost-sharing.", + "Sentence": "These are: \n the peacekeeping assessed budget of the UN; \n rapid response (emergency) funds; voluntary contributions from donors; \n government grants, government loans and credits; \n agency cost-sharing.", "newParagraph": "general five funding source used finance ddr activity n peacekeeping assessed budget un n rapid response emergency fund voluntary contribution donor n government grant government loan credit n agency costsharing", "ProcessedSent": "n peacekeeping assessed budget un n rapid response emergency fund voluntary contribution donor n government grant government loan credit n agency costsharing", "SentID": 3165 @@ -57277,7 +57277,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1055, - "Paragraph": "For some activities in a DDR programme, certain UN agencies might be in a position to provide in-kind contributions, particularly when these activities correspond to or consist of priorities and goals in their general programming and assistance strategy. Such in-kind contributions could include, for instance, the provision of food assistance to ex-combatants during their cantonment in the demobilization stage, medical health screening, or HIV\/ AIDS counselling and sensitization. The availability and provision of these contributions for DDR programming should be discussed, identified and agreed upon during the programme design\/planning phase, and the agencies in question should be active participants in the overall integrated approach to DDR. Traditional types of in-kind contributions include: \\n security and protection services (military) \u2014 mainly outside of DDR in peacekeeping missions; \\n construction of basic infrastructure; \\n logistics and transport; \\n food assistance to ex-combatants and dependants; \\n child-specific assistance; \\n shelter, clothes and other basic subsistence needs; \\n health assistance; \\n HIV\/AIDS screening and testing; \\n public information services; \\n counselling; \\n employment creation in existing development projects.", + "Paragraph": "For some activities in a DDR programme, certain UN agencies might be in a position to provide in-kind contributions, particularly when these activities correspond to or consist of priorities and goals in their general programming and assistance strategy. Such in-kind contributions could include, for instance, the provision of food assistance to ex-combatants during their cantonment in the demobilization stage, medical health screening, or HIV\/ AIDS counselling and sensitization. The availability and provision of these contributions for DDR programming should be discussed, identified and agreed upon during the programme design\/planning phase, and the agencies in question should be active participants in the overall integrated approach to DDR. Traditional types of in-kind contributions include: \n security and protection services (military) \u2014 mainly outside of DDR in peacekeeping missions; \n construction of basic infrastructure; \n logistics and transport; \n food assistance to ex-combatants and dependants; \n child-specific assistance; \n shelter, clothes and other basic subsistence needs; \n health assistance; \n HIV\/AIDS screening and testing; \n public information services; \n counselling; \n employment creation in existing development projects.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -57295,7 +57295,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1055, - "Paragraph": "For some activities in a DDR programme, certain UN agencies might be in a position to provide in-kind contributions, particularly when these activities correspond to or consist of priorities and goals in their general programming and assistance strategy. Such in-kind contributions could include, for instance, the provision of food assistance to ex-combatants during their cantonment in the demobilization stage, medical health screening, or HIV\/ AIDS counselling and sensitization. The availability and provision of these contributions for DDR programming should be discussed, identified and agreed upon during the programme design\/planning phase, and the agencies in question should be active participants in the overall integrated approach to DDR. Traditional types of in-kind contributions include: \\n security and protection services (military) \u2014 mainly outside of DDR in peacekeeping missions; \\n construction of basic infrastructure; \\n logistics and transport; \\n food assistance to ex-combatants and dependants; \\n child-specific assistance; \\n shelter, clothes and other basic subsistence needs; \\n health assistance; \\n HIV\/AIDS screening and testing; \\n public information services; \\n counselling; \\n employment creation in existing development projects.", + "Paragraph": "For some activities in a DDR programme, certain UN agencies might be in a position to provide in-kind contributions, particularly when these activities correspond to or consist of priorities and goals in their general programming and assistance strategy. Such in-kind contributions could include, for instance, the provision of food assistance to ex-combatants during their cantonment in the demobilization stage, medical health screening, or HIV\/ AIDS counselling and sensitization. The availability and provision of these contributions for DDR programming should be discussed, identified and agreed upon during the programme design\/planning phase, and the agencies in question should be active participants in the overall integrated approach to DDR. Traditional types of in-kind contributions include: \n security and protection services (military) \u2014 mainly outside of DDR in peacekeeping missions; \n construction of basic infrastructure; \n logistics and transport; \n food assistance to ex-combatants and dependants; \n child-specific assistance; \n shelter, clothes and other basic subsistence needs; \n health assistance; \n HIV\/AIDS screening and testing; \n public information services; \n counselling; \n employment creation in existing development projects.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -57313,7 +57313,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1055, - "Paragraph": "For some activities in a DDR programme, certain UN agencies might be in a position to provide in-kind contributions, particularly when these activities correspond to or consist of priorities and goals in their general programming and assistance strategy. Such in-kind contributions could include, for instance, the provision of food assistance to ex-combatants during their cantonment in the demobilization stage, medical health screening, or HIV\/ AIDS counselling and sensitization. The availability and provision of these contributions for DDR programming should be discussed, identified and agreed upon during the programme design\/planning phase, and the agencies in question should be active participants in the overall integrated approach to DDR. Traditional types of in-kind contributions include: \\n security and protection services (military) \u2014 mainly outside of DDR in peacekeeping missions; \\n construction of basic infrastructure; \\n logistics and transport; \\n food assistance to ex-combatants and dependants; \\n child-specific assistance; \\n shelter, clothes and other basic subsistence needs; \\n health assistance; \\n HIV\/AIDS screening and testing; \\n public information services; \\n counselling; \\n employment creation in existing development projects.", + "Paragraph": "For some activities in a DDR programme, certain UN agencies might be in a position to provide in-kind contributions, particularly when these activities correspond to or consist of priorities and goals in their general programming and assistance strategy. Such in-kind contributions could include, for instance, the provision of food assistance to ex-combatants during their cantonment in the demobilization stage, medical health screening, or HIV\/ AIDS counselling and sensitization. The availability and provision of these contributions for DDR programming should be discussed, identified and agreed upon during the programme design\/planning phase, and the agencies in question should be active participants in the overall integrated approach to DDR. Traditional types of in-kind contributions include: \n security and protection services (military) \u2014 mainly outside of DDR in peacekeeping missions; \n construction of basic infrastructure; \n logistics and transport; \n food assistance to ex-combatants and dependants; \n child-specific assistance; \n shelter, clothes and other basic subsistence needs; \n health assistance; \n HIV\/AIDS screening and testing; \n public information services; \n counselling; \n employment creation in existing development projects.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -57331,7 +57331,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1055, - "Paragraph": "For some activities in a DDR programme, certain UN agencies might be in a position to provide in-kind contributions, particularly when these activities correspond to or consist of priorities and goals in their general programming and assistance strategy. Such in-kind contributions could include, for instance, the provision of food assistance to ex-combatants during their cantonment in the demobilization stage, medical health screening, or HIV\/ AIDS counselling and sensitization. The availability and provision of these contributions for DDR programming should be discussed, identified and agreed upon during the programme design\/planning phase, and the agencies in question should be active participants in the overall integrated approach to DDR. Traditional types of in-kind contributions include: \\n security and protection services (military) \u2014 mainly outside of DDR in peacekeeping missions; \\n construction of basic infrastructure; \\n logistics and transport; \\n food assistance to ex-combatants and dependants; \\n child-specific assistance; \\n shelter, clothes and other basic subsistence needs; \\n health assistance; \\n HIV\/AIDS screening and testing; \\n public information services; \\n counselling; \\n employment creation in existing development projects.", + "Paragraph": "For some activities in a DDR programme, certain UN agencies might be in a position to provide in-kind contributions, particularly when these activities correspond to or consist of priorities and goals in their general programming and assistance strategy. Such in-kind contributions could include, for instance, the provision of food assistance to ex-combatants during their cantonment in the demobilization stage, medical health screening, or HIV\/ AIDS counselling and sensitization. The availability and provision of these contributions for DDR programming should be discussed, identified and agreed upon during the programme design\/planning phase, and the agencies in question should be active participants in the overall integrated approach to DDR. Traditional types of in-kind contributions include: \n security and protection services (military) \u2014 mainly outside of DDR in peacekeeping missions; \n construction of basic infrastructure; \n logistics and transport; \n food assistance to ex-combatants and dependants; \n child-specific assistance; \n shelter, clothes and other basic subsistence needs; \n health assistance; \n HIV\/AIDS screening and testing; \n public information services; \n counselling; \n employment creation in existing development projects.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -57342,7 +57342,7 @@ "Heading2": "10.3. Agency in-kind contributions", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Traditional types of in-kind contributions include: \\n security and protection services (military) \u2014 mainly outside of DDR in peacekeeping missions; \\n construction of basic infrastructure; \\n logistics and transport; \\n food assistance to ex-combatants and dependants; \\n child-specific assistance; \\n shelter, clothes and other basic subsistence needs; \\n health assistance; \\n HIV\/AIDS screening and testing; \\n public information services; \\n counselling; \\n employment creation in existing development projects.", + "Sentence": "Traditional types of in-kind contributions include: \n security and protection services (military) \u2014 mainly outside of DDR in peacekeeping missions; \n construction of basic infrastructure; \n logistics and transport; \n food assistance to ex-combatants and dependants; \n child-specific assistance; \n shelter, clothes and other basic subsistence needs; \n health assistance; \n HIV\/AIDS screening and testing; \n public information services; \n counselling; \n employment creation in existing development projects.", "newParagraph": "activity ddr programme certain un agency might position provide inkind contribution particularly activity correspond consist priority goal general programming assistance strategy inkind contribution could include instance provision food assistance excombatants cantonment demobilization stage medical health screening hiv aid counselling sensitization availability provision contribution ddr programming discussed identified agreed upon programme designplanning phase agency question active participant overall integrated approach ddr traditional type inkind contribution include n security protection service military mainly outside ddr peacekeeping mission n construction basic infrastructure n logistics transport n food assistance excombatants dependant n childspecific assistance n shelter clothes basic subsistence need n health assistance n hivaids screening testing n public information service n counselling n employment creation existing development project", "ProcessedSent": "traditional type inkind contribution include n security protection service military mainly outside ddr peacekeeping mission n construction basic infrastructure n logistics transport n food assistance excombatants dependant n childspecific assistance n shelter clothes basic subsistence need n health assistance n hivaids screening testing n public information service n counselling n employment creation existing development project", "SentID": 3185 @@ -57583,7 +57583,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1062, - "Paragraph": "RBB has four main components: \\n Objective: Serving as the basis for developing programme activities and identifying benchmarks for success; \\n Indicators of achievement: Measuring performance, justifying the resource requirements and linking them to outputs; \\n Outputs: Listing the activities that will be conducted in order to achieve the objective; \\n External factors: Identifying factors outside the control of the programme manager that may affect programme performance.", + "Paragraph": "RBB has four main components: \n Objective: Serving as the basis for developing programme activities and identifying benchmarks for success; \n Indicators of achievement: Measuring performance, justifying the resource requirements and linking them to outputs; \n Outputs: Listing the activities that will be conducted in order to achieve the objective; \n External factors: Identifying factors outside the control of the programme manager that may affect programme performance.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -57594,14 +57594,14 @@ "Heading2": "12.1. Results-based budgeting for DDR in a peacekeeping environment", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "RBB has four main components: \\n Objective: Serving as the basis for developing programme activities and identifying benchmarks for success; \\n Indicators of achievement: Measuring performance, justifying the resource requirements and linking them to outputs; \\n Outputs: Listing the activities that will be conducted in order to achieve the objective; \\n External factors: Identifying factors outside the control of the programme manager that may affect programme performance.", + "Sentence": "RBB has four main components: \n Objective: Serving as the basis for developing programme activities and identifying benchmarks for success; \n Indicators of achievement: Measuring performance, justifying the resource requirements and linking them to outputs; \n Outputs: Listing the activities that will be conducted in order to achieve the objective; \n External factors: Identifying factors outside the control of the programme manager that may affect programme performance.", "newParagraph": "rbb four main component n objective serving basis developing programme activity identifying benchmark success n indicator achievement measuring performance justifying resource requirement linking output n output listing activity conducted order achieve objective n external factor identifying factor outside control programme manager may affect programme performance", "ProcessedSent": "rbb four main component n objective serving basis developing programme activity identifying benchmark success n indicator achievement measuring performance justifying resource requirement linking output n output listing activity conducted order achieve objective n external factor identifying factor outside control programme manager may affect programme performance", "SentID": 3199 }, { "ParagraphID": 1063, - "Paragraph": "Integrated DDR programmes should develop, to the extent possible, a single structure for managing and coordinating: \\n the receipt of funds from various funding sources and mechanisms; \\n the allocation of funds to specific projects, activities and implementing partners; \\n adequate monitoring, oversight and reporting on the use of funds.", + "Paragraph": "Integrated DDR programmes should develop, to the extent possible, a single structure for managing and coordinating: \n the receipt of funds from various funding sources and mechanisms; \n the allocation of funds to specific projects, activities and implementing partners; \n adequate monitoring, oversight and reporting on the use of funds.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -57612,14 +57612,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Integrated DDR programmes should develop, to the extent possible, a single structure for managing and coordinating: \\n the receipt of funds from various funding sources and mechanisms; \\n the allocation of funds to specific projects, activities and implementing partners; \\n adequate monitoring, oversight and reporting on the use of funds.", + "Sentence": "Integrated DDR programmes should develop, to the extent possible, a single structure for managing and coordinating: \n the receipt of funds from various funding sources and mechanisms; \n the allocation of funds to specific projects, activities and implementing partners; \n adequate monitoring, oversight and reporting on the use of funds.", "newParagraph": "integrated ddr programme develop extent possible single structure managing coordinating n receipt fund various funding source mechanism n allocation fund specific project activity implementing partner n adequate monitoring oversight reporting use fund", "ProcessedSent": "integrated ddr programme develop extent possible single structure managing coordinating n receipt fund various funding source mechanism n allocation fund specific project activity implementing partner n adequate monitoring oversight reporting use fund", "SentID": 3200 }, { "ParagraphID": 1064, - "Paragraph": "In order to achieve these goals, the structure should ideally: \\n include a coordinated arrangement for the funding of DDR activities that would be administered by either the UN or jointly with another organization such as the World Bank, with an agreed structure for joint coordination, monitoring and evaluation; \\n establish a direct link with integrated DDR planning and programming frameworks; \\n include all key stakeholders on DDR, while ensuring the primacy of national ownership; \\n bring together within one framework all available sources of funding, as well as related methods (including trust funds and pass-through arrangements, for instance), in order to establish a well-coordinated and coherent system for ensuring flexible and sustain- able financing of DDR activities.", + "Paragraph": "In order to achieve these goals, the structure should ideally: \n include a coordinated arrangement for the funding of DDR activities that would be administered by either the UN or jointly with another organization such as the World Bank, with an agreed structure for joint coordination, monitoring and evaluation; \n establish a direct link with integrated DDR planning and programming frameworks; \n include all key stakeholders on DDR, while ensuring the primacy of national ownership; \n bring together within one framework all available sources of funding, as well as related methods (including trust funds and pass-through arrangements, for instance), in order to establish a well-coordinated and coherent system for ensuring flexible and sustain- able financing of DDR activities.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -57630,7 +57630,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "In order to achieve these goals, the structure should ideally: \\n include a coordinated arrangement for the funding of DDR activities that would be administered by either the UN or jointly with another organization such as the World Bank, with an agreed structure for joint coordination, monitoring and evaluation; \\n establish a direct link with integrated DDR planning and programming frameworks; \\n include all key stakeholders on DDR, while ensuring the primacy of national ownership; \\n bring together within one framework all available sources of funding, as well as related methods (including trust funds and pass-through arrangements, for instance), in order to establish a well-coordinated and coherent system for ensuring flexible and sustain- able financing of DDR activities.", + "Sentence": "In order to achieve these goals, the structure should ideally: \n include a coordinated arrangement for the funding of DDR activities that would be administered by either the UN or jointly with another organization such as the World Bank, with an agreed structure for joint coordination, monitoring and evaluation; \n establish a direct link with integrated DDR planning and programming frameworks; \n include all key stakeholders on DDR, while ensuring the primacy of national ownership; \n bring together within one framework all available sources of funding, as well as related methods (including trust funds and pass-through arrangements, for instance), in order to establish a well-coordinated and coherent system for ensuring flexible and sustain- able financing of DDR activities.", "newParagraph": "order achieve goal structure ideally n include coordinated arrangement funding ddr activity would administered either un jointly another organization world bank agreed structure joint coordination monitoring evaluation n establish direct link integrated ddr planning programming framework n include key stakeholder ddr ensuring primacy national ownership n bring together within one framework available source funding well related method including trust fund passthrough arrangement instance order establish wellcoordinated coherent system ensuring flexible sustain able financing ddr activity", "ProcessedSent": "order achieve goal structure ideally n include coordinated arrangement funding ddr activity would administered either un jointly another organization world bank agreed structure joint coordination monitoring evaluation n establish direct link integrated ddr planning programming framework n include key stakeholder ddr ensuring primacy national ownership n bring together within one framework available source funding well related method including trust fund passthrough arrangement instance order establish wellcoordinated coherent system ensuring flexible sustain able financing ddr activity", "SentID": 3201 @@ -57691,7 +57691,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1066, - "Paragraph": "The core elements of a DDR financial and management structure should ideally include the following: \\n a steering committee to provide overall strategic guidance and policy direction on DDR financing; ensure coherence with DDR strategy, priorities and programming framework; and ensure adequate coordination among key stakeholders (national actors, donors, UN agencies, the World Bank and other partners); \\n a coordination committee to coordinate the overall programme of activities to be financed through the funding structure, monitor coherence of programme activities and funding structure objectives, and ensure that the programmes are coordinated with broader frameworks and processes (e.g., recovery and SSR), as well as the overall national pro- gramme and other initiatives taking place at the same time; \\n a technical committee to provide general technical advice, carry out technical review of funding proposals and eligibility, and provide recommendations on the suitability of funding. The technical committee should include UN technical advisers, national rep- resentatives, donors and the chair of the steering committee; \\n a project approval committee to examine and approve eligible funding proposals sub- mitted to the DDR funding structure, provide strategic guidance on the use of funds, and ensure coherence and coordination between the funding structure and national priorities; \\n a secretariat to support the work of the committee through informational, administra- tive and secretarial responsibilities. The secretariat should also ensure adequate and consistent reporting on activities financed by the funding structure, as well as overall financial tracking. In certain cases, the secretariat could also be tasked with management of financial services such as procurement and contracting.", + "Paragraph": "The core elements of a DDR financial and management structure should ideally include the following: \n a steering committee to provide overall strategic guidance and policy direction on DDR financing; ensure coherence with DDR strategy, priorities and programming framework; and ensure adequate coordination among key stakeholders (national actors, donors, UN agencies, the World Bank and other partners); \n a coordination committee to coordinate the overall programme of activities to be financed through the funding structure, monitor coherence of programme activities and funding structure objectives, and ensure that the programmes are coordinated with broader frameworks and processes (e.g., recovery and SSR), as well as the overall national pro- gramme and other initiatives taking place at the same time; \n a technical committee to provide general technical advice, carry out technical review of funding proposals and eligibility, and provide recommendations on the suitability of funding. The technical committee should include UN technical advisers, national rep- resentatives, donors and the chair of the steering committee; \n a project approval committee to examine and approve eligible funding proposals sub- mitted to the DDR funding structure, provide strategic guidance on the use of funds, and ensure coherence and coordination between the funding structure and national priorities; \n a secretariat to support the work of the committee through informational, administra- tive and secretarial responsibilities. The secretariat should also ensure adequate and consistent reporting on activities financed by the funding structure, as well as overall financial tracking. In certain cases, the secretariat could also be tasked with management of financial services such as procurement and contracting.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -57702,14 +57702,14 @@ "Heading2": "13.2. Institutional and management structures", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The core elements of a DDR financial and management structure should ideally include the following: \\n a steering committee to provide overall strategic guidance and policy direction on DDR financing; ensure coherence with DDR strategy, priorities and programming framework; and ensure adequate coordination among key stakeholders (national actors, donors, UN agencies, the World Bank and other partners); \\n a coordination committee to coordinate the overall programme of activities to be financed through the funding structure, monitor coherence of programme activities and funding structure objectives, and ensure that the programmes are coordinated with broader frameworks and processes (e.g., recovery and SSR), as well as the overall national pro- gramme and other initiatives taking place at the same time; \\n a technical committee to provide general technical advice, carry out technical review of funding proposals and eligibility, and provide recommendations on the suitability of funding.", + "Sentence": "The core elements of a DDR financial and management structure should ideally include the following: \n a steering committee to provide overall strategic guidance and policy direction on DDR financing; ensure coherence with DDR strategy, priorities and programming framework; and ensure adequate coordination among key stakeholders (national actors, donors, UN agencies, the World Bank and other partners); \n a coordination committee to coordinate the overall programme of activities to be financed through the funding structure, monitor coherence of programme activities and funding structure objectives, and ensure that the programmes are coordinated with broader frameworks and processes (e.g., recovery and SSR), as well as the overall national pro- gramme and other initiatives taking place at the same time; \n a technical committee to provide general technical advice, carry out technical review of funding proposals and eligibility, and provide recommendations on the suitability of funding.", "newParagraph": "core element ddr financial management structure ideally include following n steering committee provide overall strategic guidance policy direction ddr financing ensure coherence ddr strategy priority programming framework ensure adequate coordination among key stakeholder national actor donor un agency world bank partner n coordination committee coordinate overall programme activity financed funding structure monitor coherence programme activity funding structure objective ensure programme coordinated broader framework process eg recovery ssr well overall national pro gramme initiative taking place time n technical committee provide general technical advice carry technical review funding proposal eligibility provide recommendation suitability funding technical committee include un technical adviser national rep resentatives donor chair steering committee n project approval committee examine approve eligible funding proposal sub mitted ddr funding structure provide strategic guidance use fund ensure coherence coordination funding structure national priority n secretariat support work committee informational administra tive secretarial responsibility secretariat also ensure adequate consistent reporting activity financed funding structure well overall financial tracking certain case secretariat could also tasked management financial service procurement contracting", "ProcessedSent": "core element ddr financial management structure ideally include following n steering committee provide overall strategic guidance policy direction ddr financing ensure coherence ddr strategy priority programming framework ensure adequate coordination among key stakeholder national actor donor un agency world bank partner n coordination committee coordinate overall programme activity financed funding structure monitor coherence programme activity funding structure objective ensure programme coordinated broader framework process eg recovery ssr well overall national pro gramme initiative taking place time n technical committee provide general technical advice carry technical review funding proposal eligibility provide recommendation suitability funding", "SentID": 3205 }, { "ParagraphID": 1066, - "Paragraph": "The core elements of a DDR financial and management structure should ideally include the following: \\n a steering committee to provide overall strategic guidance and policy direction on DDR financing; ensure coherence with DDR strategy, priorities and programming framework; and ensure adequate coordination among key stakeholders (national actors, donors, UN agencies, the World Bank and other partners); \\n a coordination committee to coordinate the overall programme of activities to be financed through the funding structure, monitor coherence of programme activities and funding structure objectives, and ensure that the programmes are coordinated with broader frameworks and processes (e.g., recovery and SSR), as well as the overall national pro- gramme and other initiatives taking place at the same time; \\n a technical committee to provide general technical advice, carry out technical review of funding proposals and eligibility, and provide recommendations on the suitability of funding. The technical committee should include UN technical advisers, national rep- resentatives, donors and the chair of the steering committee; \\n a project approval committee to examine and approve eligible funding proposals sub- mitted to the DDR funding structure, provide strategic guidance on the use of funds, and ensure coherence and coordination between the funding structure and national priorities; \\n a secretariat to support the work of the committee through informational, administra- tive and secretarial responsibilities. The secretariat should also ensure adequate and consistent reporting on activities financed by the funding structure, as well as overall financial tracking. In certain cases, the secretariat could also be tasked with management of financial services such as procurement and contracting.", + "Paragraph": "The core elements of a DDR financial and management structure should ideally include the following: \n a steering committee to provide overall strategic guidance and policy direction on DDR financing; ensure coherence with DDR strategy, priorities and programming framework; and ensure adequate coordination among key stakeholders (national actors, donors, UN agencies, the World Bank and other partners); \n a coordination committee to coordinate the overall programme of activities to be financed through the funding structure, monitor coherence of programme activities and funding structure objectives, and ensure that the programmes are coordinated with broader frameworks and processes (e.g., recovery and SSR), as well as the overall national pro- gramme and other initiatives taking place at the same time; \n a technical committee to provide general technical advice, carry out technical review of funding proposals and eligibility, and provide recommendations on the suitability of funding. The technical committee should include UN technical advisers, national rep- resentatives, donors and the chair of the steering committee; \n a project approval committee to examine and approve eligible funding proposals sub- mitted to the DDR funding structure, provide strategic guidance on the use of funds, and ensure coherence and coordination between the funding structure and national priorities; \n a secretariat to support the work of the committee through informational, administra- tive and secretarial responsibilities. The secretariat should also ensure adequate and consistent reporting on activities financed by the funding structure, as well as overall financial tracking. In certain cases, the secretariat could also be tasked with management of financial services such as procurement and contracting.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -57720,14 +57720,14 @@ "Heading2": "13.2. Institutional and management structures", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The technical committee should include UN technical advisers, national rep- resentatives, donors and the chair of the steering committee; \\n a project approval committee to examine and approve eligible funding proposals sub- mitted to the DDR funding structure, provide strategic guidance on the use of funds, and ensure coherence and coordination between the funding structure and national priorities; \\n a secretariat to support the work of the committee through informational, administra- tive and secretarial responsibilities.", + "Sentence": "The technical committee should include UN technical advisers, national rep- resentatives, donors and the chair of the steering committee; \n a project approval committee to examine and approve eligible funding proposals sub- mitted to the DDR funding structure, provide strategic guidance on the use of funds, and ensure coherence and coordination between the funding structure and national priorities; \n a secretariat to support the work of the committee through informational, administra- tive and secretarial responsibilities.", "newParagraph": "core element ddr financial management structure ideally include following n steering committee provide overall strategic guidance policy direction ddr financing ensure coherence ddr strategy priority programming framework ensure adequate coordination among key stakeholder national actor donor un agency world bank partner n coordination committee coordinate overall programme activity financed funding structure monitor coherence programme activity funding structure objective ensure programme coordinated broader framework process eg recovery ssr well overall national pro gramme initiative taking place time n technical committee provide general technical advice carry technical review funding proposal eligibility provide recommendation suitability funding technical committee include un technical adviser national rep resentatives donor chair steering committee n project approval committee examine approve eligible funding proposal sub mitted ddr funding structure provide strategic guidance use fund ensure coherence coordination funding structure national priority n secretariat support work committee informational administra tive secretarial responsibility secretariat also ensure adequate consistent reporting activity financed funding structure well overall financial tracking certain case secretariat could also tasked management financial service procurement contracting", "ProcessedSent": "technical committee include un technical adviser national rep resentatives donor chair steering committee n project approval committee examine approve eligible funding proposal sub mitted ddr funding structure provide strategic guidance use fund ensure coherence coordination funding structure national priority n secretariat support work committee informational administra tive secretarial responsibility", "SentID": 3206 }, { "ParagraphID": 1066, - "Paragraph": "The core elements of a DDR financial and management structure should ideally include the following: \\n a steering committee to provide overall strategic guidance and policy direction on DDR financing; ensure coherence with DDR strategy, priorities and programming framework; and ensure adequate coordination among key stakeholders (national actors, donors, UN agencies, the World Bank and other partners); \\n a coordination committee to coordinate the overall programme of activities to be financed through the funding structure, monitor coherence of programme activities and funding structure objectives, and ensure that the programmes are coordinated with broader frameworks and processes (e.g., recovery and SSR), as well as the overall national pro- gramme and other initiatives taking place at the same time; \\n a technical committee to provide general technical advice, carry out technical review of funding proposals and eligibility, and provide recommendations on the suitability of funding. The technical committee should include UN technical advisers, national rep- resentatives, donors and the chair of the steering committee; \\n a project approval committee to examine and approve eligible funding proposals sub- mitted to the DDR funding structure, provide strategic guidance on the use of funds, and ensure coherence and coordination between the funding structure and national priorities; \\n a secretariat to support the work of the committee through informational, administra- tive and secretarial responsibilities. The secretariat should also ensure adequate and consistent reporting on activities financed by the funding structure, as well as overall financial tracking. In certain cases, the secretariat could also be tasked with management of financial services such as procurement and contracting.", + "Paragraph": "The core elements of a DDR financial and management structure should ideally include the following: \n a steering committee to provide overall strategic guidance and policy direction on DDR financing; ensure coherence with DDR strategy, priorities and programming framework; and ensure adequate coordination among key stakeholders (national actors, donors, UN agencies, the World Bank and other partners); \n a coordination committee to coordinate the overall programme of activities to be financed through the funding structure, monitor coherence of programme activities and funding structure objectives, and ensure that the programmes are coordinated with broader frameworks and processes (e.g., recovery and SSR), as well as the overall national pro- gramme and other initiatives taking place at the same time; \n a technical committee to provide general technical advice, carry out technical review of funding proposals and eligibility, and provide recommendations on the suitability of funding. The technical committee should include UN technical advisers, national rep- resentatives, donors and the chair of the steering committee; \n a project approval committee to examine and approve eligible funding proposals sub- mitted to the DDR funding structure, provide strategic guidance on the use of funds, and ensure coherence and coordination between the funding structure and national priorities; \n a secretariat to support the work of the committee through informational, administra- tive and secretarial responsibilities. The secretariat should also ensure adequate and consistent reporting on activities financed by the funding structure, as well as overall financial tracking. In certain cases, the secretariat could also be tasked with management of financial services such as procurement and contracting.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -57745,7 +57745,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1066, - "Paragraph": "The core elements of a DDR financial and management structure should ideally include the following: \\n a steering committee to provide overall strategic guidance and policy direction on DDR financing; ensure coherence with DDR strategy, priorities and programming framework; and ensure adequate coordination among key stakeholders (national actors, donors, UN agencies, the World Bank and other partners); \\n a coordination committee to coordinate the overall programme of activities to be financed through the funding structure, monitor coherence of programme activities and funding structure objectives, and ensure that the programmes are coordinated with broader frameworks and processes (e.g., recovery and SSR), as well as the overall national pro- gramme and other initiatives taking place at the same time; \\n a technical committee to provide general technical advice, carry out technical review of funding proposals and eligibility, and provide recommendations on the suitability of funding. The technical committee should include UN technical advisers, national rep- resentatives, donors and the chair of the steering committee; \\n a project approval committee to examine and approve eligible funding proposals sub- mitted to the DDR funding structure, provide strategic guidance on the use of funds, and ensure coherence and coordination between the funding structure and national priorities; \\n a secretariat to support the work of the committee through informational, administra- tive and secretarial responsibilities. The secretariat should also ensure adequate and consistent reporting on activities financed by the funding structure, as well as overall financial tracking. In certain cases, the secretariat could also be tasked with management of financial services such as procurement and contracting.", + "Paragraph": "The core elements of a DDR financial and management structure should ideally include the following: \n a steering committee to provide overall strategic guidance and policy direction on DDR financing; ensure coherence with DDR strategy, priorities and programming framework; and ensure adequate coordination among key stakeholders (national actors, donors, UN agencies, the World Bank and other partners); \n a coordination committee to coordinate the overall programme of activities to be financed through the funding structure, monitor coherence of programme activities and funding structure objectives, and ensure that the programmes are coordinated with broader frameworks and processes (e.g., recovery and SSR), as well as the overall national pro- gramme and other initiatives taking place at the same time; \n a technical committee to provide general technical advice, carry out technical review of funding proposals and eligibility, and provide recommendations on the suitability of funding. The technical committee should include UN technical advisers, national rep- resentatives, donors and the chair of the steering committee; \n a project approval committee to examine and approve eligible funding proposals sub- mitted to the DDR funding structure, provide strategic guidance on the use of funds, and ensure coherence and coordination between the funding structure and national priorities; \n a secretariat to support the work of the committee through informational, administra- tive and secretarial responsibilities. The secretariat should also ensure adequate and consistent reporting on activities financed by the funding structure, as well as overall financial tracking. In certain cases, the secretariat could also be tasked with management of financial services such as procurement and contracting.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -57817,7 +57817,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1069, - "Paragraph": "Given the complexity and scope of DDR interventions, as well as the range of stakeholders involved, parallel initiatives, both UN and non-UN, are inevitable. Links shall be created between the national and UN DDR frameworks to ensure that these do not duplicate or otherwise affect overall coherence. The basic requirement of good coordination between integrated and parallel processes is an agreement on common strategic, planning and policy frameworks, which should be based on national policy priorities, if they exist. Structurally, stakeholders involved in parallel initiatives should participate on the steering and coordi- nation committees of the DDR funding structure, even though the actual administration and management of funds takes place outside this framework. This will avoid duplication of efforts and ensure a link to operational coordination, and enable the development of an aggregated\/consolidated overall budget and work plan for DDR. Normal parallel funding mechanisms include the following: \\n Mission financing: Although the UN peacekeeping mission is a key component of the overall UN integrated structure for DDR, its main funding mechanism (assessed contri- butions) is managed directly by the mission itself in coordination with DPKO Head- quarters, and cannot be integrated fully into the DDR funding structure. For this reason, it should be considered a parallel funding mechanism, even though the DDR funding structure decides how funds are used and managed; \\n Parallel agency funds: Certain agencies might have programmes that could support DDR activities (e.g., food assistance for ex-combatants as part of a broader food assistance programme), or even DDR projects that fall outside the overall integrated programme framework; \\n Bilateral assistance funds: Some donors, particularly those whose bilateral aid agencies are active on post-conflict and\/or DDR issues (such as USAID, DFID, CIDA, etc.) might choose to finance programmes that are parallel to integrated efforts, and which are directly implemented by national or sub-national partners. In this context, it is important to ensure that these donors are active participants in DDR and the funding structures involved, and to ensure adequate operational coordination (particularly to ensure that the intended geographic areas and beneficiaries are covered by the programme).", + "Paragraph": "Given the complexity and scope of DDR interventions, as well as the range of stakeholders involved, parallel initiatives, both UN and non-UN, are inevitable. Links shall be created between the national and UN DDR frameworks to ensure that these do not duplicate or otherwise affect overall coherence. The basic requirement of good coordination between integrated and parallel processes is an agreement on common strategic, planning and policy frameworks, which should be based on national policy priorities, if they exist. Structurally, stakeholders involved in parallel initiatives should participate on the steering and coordi- nation committees of the DDR funding structure, even though the actual administration and management of funds takes place outside this framework. This will avoid duplication of efforts and ensure a link to operational coordination, and enable the development of an aggregated\/consolidated overall budget and work plan for DDR. Normal parallel funding mechanisms include the following: \n Mission financing: Although the UN peacekeeping mission is a key component of the overall UN integrated structure for DDR, its main funding mechanism (assessed contri- butions) is managed directly by the mission itself in coordination with DPKO Head- quarters, and cannot be integrated fully into the DDR funding structure. For this reason, it should be considered a parallel funding mechanism, even though the DDR funding structure decides how funds are used and managed; \n Parallel agency funds: Certain agencies might have programmes that could support DDR activities (e.g., food assistance for ex-combatants as part of a broader food assistance programme), or even DDR projects that fall outside the overall integrated programme framework; \n Bilateral assistance funds: Some donors, particularly those whose bilateral aid agencies are active on post-conflict and\/or DDR issues (such as USAID, DFID, CIDA, etc.) might choose to finance programmes that are parallel to integrated efforts, and which are directly implemented by national or sub-national partners. In this context, it is important to ensure that these donors are active participants in DDR and the funding structures involved, and to ensure adequate operational coordination (particularly to ensure that the intended geographic areas and beneficiaries are covered by the programme).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -57835,7 +57835,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1069, - "Paragraph": "Given the complexity and scope of DDR interventions, as well as the range of stakeholders involved, parallel initiatives, both UN and non-UN, are inevitable. Links shall be created between the national and UN DDR frameworks to ensure that these do not duplicate or otherwise affect overall coherence. The basic requirement of good coordination between integrated and parallel processes is an agreement on common strategic, planning and policy frameworks, which should be based on national policy priorities, if they exist. Structurally, stakeholders involved in parallel initiatives should participate on the steering and coordi- nation committees of the DDR funding structure, even though the actual administration and management of funds takes place outside this framework. This will avoid duplication of efforts and ensure a link to operational coordination, and enable the development of an aggregated\/consolidated overall budget and work plan for DDR. Normal parallel funding mechanisms include the following: \\n Mission financing: Although the UN peacekeeping mission is a key component of the overall UN integrated structure for DDR, its main funding mechanism (assessed contri- butions) is managed directly by the mission itself in coordination with DPKO Head- quarters, and cannot be integrated fully into the DDR funding structure. For this reason, it should be considered a parallel funding mechanism, even though the DDR funding structure decides how funds are used and managed; \\n Parallel agency funds: Certain agencies might have programmes that could support DDR activities (e.g., food assistance for ex-combatants as part of a broader food assistance programme), or even DDR projects that fall outside the overall integrated programme framework; \\n Bilateral assistance funds: Some donors, particularly those whose bilateral aid agencies are active on post-conflict and\/or DDR issues (such as USAID, DFID, CIDA, etc.) might choose to finance programmes that are parallel to integrated efforts, and which are directly implemented by national or sub-national partners. In this context, it is important to ensure that these donors are active participants in DDR and the funding structures involved, and to ensure adequate operational coordination (particularly to ensure that the intended geographic areas and beneficiaries are covered by the programme).", + "Paragraph": "Given the complexity and scope of DDR interventions, as well as the range of stakeholders involved, parallel initiatives, both UN and non-UN, are inevitable. Links shall be created between the national and UN DDR frameworks to ensure that these do not duplicate or otherwise affect overall coherence. The basic requirement of good coordination between integrated and parallel processes is an agreement on common strategic, planning and policy frameworks, which should be based on national policy priorities, if they exist. Structurally, stakeholders involved in parallel initiatives should participate on the steering and coordi- nation committees of the DDR funding structure, even though the actual administration and management of funds takes place outside this framework. This will avoid duplication of efforts and ensure a link to operational coordination, and enable the development of an aggregated\/consolidated overall budget and work plan for DDR. Normal parallel funding mechanisms include the following: \n Mission financing: Although the UN peacekeeping mission is a key component of the overall UN integrated structure for DDR, its main funding mechanism (assessed contri- butions) is managed directly by the mission itself in coordination with DPKO Head- quarters, and cannot be integrated fully into the DDR funding structure. For this reason, it should be considered a parallel funding mechanism, even though the DDR funding structure decides how funds are used and managed; \n Parallel agency funds: Certain agencies might have programmes that could support DDR activities (e.g., food assistance for ex-combatants as part of a broader food assistance programme), or even DDR projects that fall outside the overall integrated programme framework; \n Bilateral assistance funds: Some donors, particularly those whose bilateral aid agencies are active on post-conflict and\/or DDR issues (such as USAID, DFID, CIDA, etc.) might choose to finance programmes that are parallel to integrated efforts, and which are directly implemented by national or sub-national partners. In this context, it is important to ensure that these donors are active participants in DDR and the funding structures involved, and to ensure adequate operational coordination (particularly to ensure that the intended geographic areas and beneficiaries are covered by the programme).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -57853,7 +57853,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1069, - "Paragraph": "Given the complexity and scope of DDR interventions, as well as the range of stakeholders involved, parallel initiatives, both UN and non-UN, are inevitable. Links shall be created between the national and UN DDR frameworks to ensure that these do not duplicate or otherwise affect overall coherence. The basic requirement of good coordination between integrated and parallel processes is an agreement on common strategic, planning and policy frameworks, which should be based on national policy priorities, if they exist. Structurally, stakeholders involved in parallel initiatives should participate on the steering and coordi- nation committees of the DDR funding structure, even though the actual administration and management of funds takes place outside this framework. This will avoid duplication of efforts and ensure a link to operational coordination, and enable the development of an aggregated\/consolidated overall budget and work plan for DDR. Normal parallel funding mechanisms include the following: \\n Mission financing: Although the UN peacekeeping mission is a key component of the overall UN integrated structure for DDR, its main funding mechanism (assessed contri- butions) is managed directly by the mission itself in coordination with DPKO Head- quarters, and cannot be integrated fully into the DDR funding structure. For this reason, it should be considered a parallel funding mechanism, even though the DDR funding structure decides how funds are used and managed; \\n Parallel agency funds: Certain agencies might have programmes that could support DDR activities (e.g., food assistance for ex-combatants as part of a broader food assistance programme), or even DDR projects that fall outside the overall integrated programme framework; \\n Bilateral assistance funds: Some donors, particularly those whose bilateral aid agencies are active on post-conflict and\/or DDR issues (such as USAID, DFID, CIDA, etc.) might choose to finance programmes that are parallel to integrated efforts, and which are directly implemented by national or sub-national partners. In this context, it is important to ensure that these donors are active participants in DDR and the funding structures involved, and to ensure adequate operational coordination (particularly to ensure that the intended geographic areas and beneficiaries are covered by the programme).", + "Paragraph": "Given the complexity and scope of DDR interventions, as well as the range of stakeholders involved, parallel initiatives, both UN and non-UN, are inevitable. Links shall be created between the national and UN DDR frameworks to ensure that these do not duplicate or otherwise affect overall coherence. The basic requirement of good coordination between integrated and parallel processes is an agreement on common strategic, planning and policy frameworks, which should be based on national policy priorities, if they exist. Structurally, stakeholders involved in parallel initiatives should participate on the steering and coordi- nation committees of the DDR funding structure, even though the actual administration and management of funds takes place outside this framework. This will avoid duplication of efforts and ensure a link to operational coordination, and enable the development of an aggregated\/consolidated overall budget and work plan for DDR. Normal parallel funding mechanisms include the following: \n Mission financing: Although the UN peacekeeping mission is a key component of the overall UN integrated structure for DDR, its main funding mechanism (assessed contri- butions) is managed directly by the mission itself in coordination with DPKO Head- quarters, and cannot be integrated fully into the DDR funding structure. For this reason, it should be considered a parallel funding mechanism, even though the DDR funding structure decides how funds are used and managed; \n Parallel agency funds: Certain agencies might have programmes that could support DDR activities (e.g., food assistance for ex-combatants as part of a broader food assistance programme), or even DDR projects that fall outside the overall integrated programme framework; \n Bilateral assistance funds: Some donors, particularly those whose bilateral aid agencies are active on post-conflict and\/or DDR issues (such as USAID, DFID, CIDA, etc.) might choose to finance programmes that are parallel to integrated efforts, and which are directly implemented by national or sub-national partners. In this context, it is important to ensure that these donors are active participants in DDR and the funding structures involved, and to ensure adequate operational coordination (particularly to ensure that the intended geographic areas and beneficiaries are covered by the programme).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -57871,7 +57871,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1069, - "Paragraph": "Given the complexity and scope of DDR interventions, as well as the range of stakeholders involved, parallel initiatives, both UN and non-UN, are inevitable. Links shall be created between the national and UN DDR frameworks to ensure that these do not duplicate or otherwise affect overall coherence. The basic requirement of good coordination between integrated and parallel processes is an agreement on common strategic, planning and policy frameworks, which should be based on national policy priorities, if they exist. Structurally, stakeholders involved in parallel initiatives should participate on the steering and coordi- nation committees of the DDR funding structure, even though the actual administration and management of funds takes place outside this framework. This will avoid duplication of efforts and ensure a link to operational coordination, and enable the development of an aggregated\/consolidated overall budget and work plan for DDR. Normal parallel funding mechanisms include the following: \\n Mission financing: Although the UN peacekeeping mission is a key component of the overall UN integrated structure for DDR, its main funding mechanism (assessed contri- butions) is managed directly by the mission itself in coordination with DPKO Head- quarters, and cannot be integrated fully into the DDR funding structure. For this reason, it should be considered a parallel funding mechanism, even though the DDR funding structure decides how funds are used and managed; \\n Parallel agency funds: Certain agencies might have programmes that could support DDR activities (e.g., food assistance for ex-combatants as part of a broader food assistance programme), or even DDR projects that fall outside the overall integrated programme framework; \\n Bilateral assistance funds: Some donors, particularly those whose bilateral aid agencies are active on post-conflict and\/or DDR issues (such as USAID, DFID, CIDA, etc.) might choose to finance programmes that are parallel to integrated efforts, and which are directly implemented by national or sub-national partners. In this context, it is important to ensure that these donors are active participants in DDR and the funding structures involved, and to ensure adequate operational coordination (particularly to ensure that the intended geographic areas and beneficiaries are covered by the programme).", + "Paragraph": "Given the complexity and scope of DDR interventions, as well as the range of stakeholders involved, parallel initiatives, both UN and non-UN, are inevitable. Links shall be created between the national and UN DDR frameworks to ensure that these do not duplicate or otherwise affect overall coherence. The basic requirement of good coordination between integrated and parallel processes is an agreement on common strategic, planning and policy frameworks, which should be based on national policy priorities, if they exist. Structurally, stakeholders involved in parallel initiatives should participate on the steering and coordi- nation committees of the DDR funding structure, even though the actual administration and management of funds takes place outside this framework. This will avoid duplication of efforts and ensure a link to operational coordination, and enable the development of an aggregated\/consolidated overall budget and work plan for DDR. Normal parallel funding mechanisms include the following: \n Mission financing: Although the UN peacekeeping mission is a key component of the overall UN integrated structure for DDR, its main funding mechanism (assessed contri- butions) is managed directly by the mission itself in coordination with DPKO Head- quarters, and cannot be integrated fully into the DDR funding structure. For this reason, it should be considered a parallel funding mechanism, even though the DDR funding structure decides how funds are used and managed; \n Parallel agency funds: Certain agencies might have programmes that could support DDR activities (e.g., food assistance for ex-combatants as part of a broader food assistance programme), or even DDR projects that fall outside the overall integrated programme framework; \n Bilateral assistance funds: Some donors, particularly those whose bilateral aid agencies are active on post-conflict and\/or DDR issues (such as USAID, DFID, CIDA, etc.) might choose to finance programmes that are parallel to integrated efforts, and which are directly implemented by national or sub-national partners. In this context, it is important to ensure that these donors are active participants in DDR and the funding structures involved, and to ensure adequate operational coordination (particularly to ensure that the intended geographic areas and beneficiaries are covered by the programme).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -57889,7 +57889,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1069, - "Paragraph": "Given the complexity and scope of DDR interventions, as well as the range of stakeholders involved, parallel initiatives, both UN and non-UN, are inevitable. Links shall be created between the national and UN DDR frameworks to ensure that these do not duplicate or otherwise affect overall coherence. The basic requirement of good coordination between integrated and parallel processes is an agreement on common strategic, planning and policy frameworks, which should be based on national policy priorities, if they exist. Structurally, stakeholders involved in parallel initiatives should participate on the steering and coordi- nation committees of the DDR funding structure, even though the actual administration and management of funds takes place outside this framework. This will avoid duplication of efforts and ensure a link to operational coordination, and enable the development of an aggregated\/consolidated overall budget and work plan for DDR. Normal parallel funding mechanisms include the following: \\n Mission financing: Although the UN peacekeeping mission is a key component of the overall UN integrated structure for DDR, its main funding mechanism (assessed contri- butions) is managed directly by the mission itself in coordination with DPKO Head- quarters, and cannot be integrated fully into the DDR funding structure. For this reason, it should be considered a parallel funding mechanism, even though the DDR funding structure decides how funds are used and managed; \\n Parallel agency funds: Certain agencies might have programmes that could support DDR activities (e.g., food assistance for ex-combatants as part of a broader food assistance programme), or even DDR projects that fall outside the overall integrated programme framework; \\n Bilateral assistance funds: Some donors, particularly those whose bilateral aid agencies are active on post-conflict and\/or DDR issues (such as USAID, DFID, CIDA, etc.) might choose to finance programmes that are parallel to integrated efforts, and which are directly implemented by national or sub-national partners. In this context, it is important to ensure that these donors are active participants in DDR and the funding structures involved, and to ensure adequate operational coordination (particularly to ensure that the intended geographic areas and beneficiaries are covered by the programme).", + "Paragraph": "Given the complexity and scope of DDR interventions, as well as the range of stakeholders involved, parallel initiatives, both UN and non-UN, are inevitable. Links shall be created between the national and UN DDR frameworks to ensure that these do not duplicate or otherwise affect overall coherence. The basic requirement of good coordination between integrated and parallel processes is an agreement on common strategic, planning and policy frameworks, which should be based on national policy priorities, if they exist. Structurally, stakeholders involved in parallel initiatives should participate on the steering and coordi- nation committees of the DDR funding structure, even though the actual administration and management of funds takes place outside this framework. This will avoid duplication of efforts and ensure a link to operational coordination, and enable the development of an aggregated\/consolidated overall budget and work plan for DDR. Normal parallel funding mechanisms include the following: \n Mission financing: Although the UN peacekeeping mission is a key component of the overall UN integrated structure for DDR, its main funding mechanism (assessed contri- butions) is managed directly by the mission itself in coordination with DPKO Head- quarters, and cannot be integrated fully into the DDR funding structure. For this reason, it should be considered a parallel funding mechanism, even though the DDR funding structure decides how funds are used and managed; \n Parallel agency funds: Certain agencies might have programmes that could support DDR activities (e.g., food assistance for ex-combatants as part of a broader food assistance programme), or even DDR projects that fall outside the overall integrated programme framework; \n Bilateral assistance funds: Some donors, particularly those whose bilateral aid agencies are active on post-conflict and\/or DDR issues (such as USAID, DFID, CIDA, etc.) might choose to finance programmes that are parallel to integrated efforts, and which are directly implemented by national or sub-national partners. In this context, it is important to ensure that these donors are active participants in DDR and the funding structures involved, and to ensure adequate operational coordination (particularly to ensure that the intended geographic areas and beneficiaries are covered by the programme).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -57907,7 +57907,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1069, - "Paragraph": "Given the complexity and scope of DDR interventions, as well as the range of stakeholders involved, parallel initiatives, both UN and non-UN, are inevitable. Links shall be created between the national and UN DDR frameworks to ensure that these do not duplicate or otherwise affect overall coherence. The basic requirement of good coordination between integrated and parallel processes is an agreement on common strategic, planning and policy frameworks, which should be based on national policy priorities, if they exist. Structurally, stakeholders involved in parallel initiatives should participate on the steering and coordi- nation committees of the DDR funding structure, even though the actual administration and management of funds takes place outside this framework. This will avoid duplication of efforts and ensure a link to operational coordination, and enable the development of an aggregated\/consolidated overall budget and work plan for DDR. Normal parallel funding mechanisms include the following: \\n Mission financing: Although the UN peacekeeping mission is a key component of the overall UN integrated structure for DDR, its main funding mechanism (assessed contri- butions) is managed directly by the mission itself in coordination with DPKO Head- quarters, and cannot be integrated fully into the DDR funding structure. For this reason, it should be considered a parallel funding mechanism, even though the DDR funding structure decides how funds are used and managed; \\n Parallel agency funds: Certain agencies might have programmes that could support DDR activities (e.g., food assistance for ex-combatants as part of a broader food assistance programme), or even DDR projects that fall outside the overall integrated programme framework; \\n Bilateral assistance funds: Some donors, particularly those whose bilateral aid agencies are active on post-conflict and\/or DDR issues (such as USAID, DFID, CIDA, etc.) might choose to finance programmes that are parallel to integrated efforts, and which are directly implemented by national or sub-national partners. In this context, it is important to ensure that these donors are active participants in DDR and the funding structures involved, and to ensure adequate operational coordination (particularly to ensure that the intended geographic areas and beneficiaries are covered by the programme).", + "Paragraph": "Given the complexity and scope of DDR interventions, as well as the range of stakeholders involved, parallel initiatives, both UN and non-UN, are inevitable. Links shall be created between the national and UN DDR frameworks to ensure that these do not duplicate or otherwise affect overall coherence. The basic requirement of good coordination between integrated and parallel processes is an agreement on common strategic, planning and policy frameworks, which should be based on national policy priorities, if they exist. Structurally, stakeholders involved in parallel initiatives should participate on the steering and coordi- nation committees of the DDR funding structure, even though the actual administration and management of funds takes place outside this framework. This will avoid duplication of efforts and ensure a link to operational coordination, and enable the development of an aggregated\/consolidated overall budget and work plan for DDR. Normal parallel funding mechanisms include the following: \n Mission financing: Although the UN peacekeeping mission is a key component of the overall UN integrated structure for DDR, its main funding mechanism (assessed contri- butions) is managed directly by the mission itself in coordination with DPKO Head- quarters, and cannot be integrated fully into the DDR funding structure. For this reason, it should be considered a parallel funding mechanism, even though the DDR funding structure decides how funds are used and managed; \n Parallel agency funds: Certain agencies might have programmes that could support DDR activities (e.g., food assistance for ex-combatants as part of a broader food assistance programme), or even DDR projects that fall outside the overall integrated programme framework; \n Bilateral assistance funds: Some donors, particularly those whose bilateral aid agencies are active on post-conflict and\/or DDR issues (such as USAID, DFID, CIDA, etc.) might choose to finance programmes that are parallel to integrated efforts, and which are directly implemented by national or sub-national partners. In this context, it is important to ensure that these donors are active participants in DDR and the funding structures involved, and to ensure adequate operational coordination (particularly to ensure that the intended geographic areas and beneficiaries are covered by the programme).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -57918,14 +57918,14 @@ "Heading2": "13.4. Linking parallel funding mechanisms", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Normal parallel funding mechanisms include the following: \\n Mission financing: Although the UN peacekeeping mission is a key component of the overall UN integrated structure for DDR, its main funding mechanism (assessed contri- butions) is managed directly by the mission itself in coordination with DPKO Head- quarters, and cannot be integrated fully into the DDR funding structure.", + "Sentence": "Normal parallel funding mechanisms include the following: \n Mission financing: Although the UN peacekeeping mission is a key component of the overall UN integrated structure for DDR, its main funding mechanism (assessed contri- butions) is managed directly by the mission itself in coordination with DPKO Head- quarters, and cannot be integrated fully into the DDR funding structure.", "newParagraph": "given complexity scope ddr intervention well range stakeholder involved parallel initiative un nonun inevitable link shall created national un ddr framework ensure duplicate otherwise affect overall coherence basic requirement good coordination integrated parallel process agreement common strategic planning policy framework based national policy priority exist structurally stakeholder involved parallel initiative participate steering coordi nation committee ddr funding structure even though actual administration management fund take place outside framework avoid duplication effort ensure link operational coordination enable development aggregatedconsolidated overall budget work plan ddr normal parallel funding mechanism include following n mission financing although un peacekeeping mission key component overall un integrated structure ddr main funding mechanism assessed contri butions managed directly mission coordination dpko head quarter cannot integrated fully ddr funding structure reason considered parallel funding mechanism even though ddr funding structure decides fund used managed n parallel agency fund certain agency might programme could support ddr activity eg food assistance excombatants part broader food assistance programme even ddr project fall outside overall integrated programme framework n bilateral assistance fund donor particularly whose bilateral aid agency active postconflict andor ddr issue usaid dfid cida etc might choose finance programme parallel integrated effort directly implemented national subnational partner context important ensure donor active participant ddr funding structure involved ensure adequate operational coordination particularly ensure intended geographic area beneficiary covered programme", "ProcessedSent": "normal parallel funding mechanism include following n mission financing although un peacekeeping mission key component overall un integrated structure ddr main funding mechanism assessed contri butions managed directly mission coordination dpko head quarter cannot integrated fully ddr funding structure", "SentID": 3217 }, { "ParagraphID": 1069, - "Paragraph": "Given the complexity and scope of DDR interventions, as well as the range of stakeholders involved, parallel initiatives, both UN and non-UN, are inevitable. Links shall be created between the national and UN DDR frameworks to ensure that these do not duplicate or otherwise affect overall coherence. The basic requirement of good coordination between integrated and parallel processes is an agreement on common strategic, planning and policy frameworks, which should be based on national policy priorities, if they exist. Structurally, stakeholders involved in parallel initiatives should participate on the steering and coordi- nation committees of the DDR funding structure, even though the actual administration and management of funds takes place outside this framework. This will avoid duplication of efforts and ensure a link to operational coordination, and enable the development of an aggregated\/consolidated overall budget and work plan for DDR. Normal parallel funding mechanisms include the following: \\n Mission financing: Although the UN peacekeeping mission is a key component of the overall UN integrated structure for DDR, its main funding mechanism (assessed contri- butions) is managed directly by the mission itself in coordination with DPKO Head- quarters, and cannot be integrated fully into the DDR funding structure. For this reason, it should be considered a parallel funding mechanism, even though the DDR funding structure decides how funds are used and managed; \\n Parallel agency funds: Certain agencies might have programmes that could support DDR activities (e.g., food assistance for ex-combatants as part of a broader food assistance programme), or even DDR projects that fall outside the overall integrated programme framework; \\n Bilateral assistance funds: Some donors, particularly those whose bilateral aid agencies are active on post-conflict and\/or DDR issues (such as USAID, DFID, CIDA, etc.) might choose to finance programmes that are parallel to integrated efforts, and which are directly implemented by national or sub-national partners. In this context, it is important to ensure that these donors are active participants in DDR and the funding structures involved, and to ensure adequate operational coordination (particularly to ensure that the intended geographic areas and beneficiaries are covered by the programme).", + "Paragraph": "Given the complexity and scope of DDR interventions, as well as the range of stakeholders involved, parallel initiatives, both UN and non-UN, are inevitable. Links shall be created between the national and UN DDR frameworks to ensure that these do not duplicate or otherwise affect overall coherence. The basic requirement of good coordination between integrated and parallel processes is an agreement on common strategic, planning and policy frameworks, which should be based on national policy priorities, if they exist. Structurally, stakeholders involved in parallel initiatives should participate on the steering and coordi- nation committees of the DDR funding structure, even though the actual administration and management of funds takes place outside this framework. This will avoid duplication of efforts and ensure a link to operational coordination, and enable the development of an aggregated\/consolidated overall budget and work plan for DDR. Normal parallel funding mechanisms include the following: \n Mission financing: Although the UN peacekeeping mission is a key component of the overall UN integrated structure for DDR, its main funding mechanism (assessed contri- butions) is managed directly by the mission itself in coordination with DPKO Head- quarters, and cannot be integrated fully into the DDR funding structure. For this reason, it should be considered a parallel funding mechanism, even though the DDR funding structure decides how funds are used and managed; \n Parallel agency funds: Certain agencies might have programmes that could support DDR activities (e.g., food assistance for ex-combatants as part of a broader food assistance programme), or even DDR projects that fall outside the overall integrated programme framework; \n Bilateral assistance funds: Some donors, particularly those whose bilateral aid agencies are active on post-conflict and\/or DDR issues (such as USAID, DFID, CIDA, etc.) might choose to finance programmes that are parallel to integrated efforts, and which are directly implemented by national or sub-national partners. In this context, it is important to ensure that these donors are active participants in DDR and the funding structures involved, and to ensure adequate operational coordination (particularly to ensure that the intended geographic areas and beneficiaries are covered by the programme).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -57936,14 +57936,14 @@ "Heading2": "13.4. Linking parallel funding mechanisms", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "For this reason, it should be considered a parallel funding mechanism, even though the DDR funding structure decides how funds are used and managed; \\n Parallel agency funds: Certain agencies might have programmes that could support DDR activities (e.g., food assistance for ex-combatants as part of a broader food assistance programme), or even DDR projects that fall outside the overall integrated programme framework; \\n Bilateral assistance funds: Some donors, particularly those whose bilateral aid agencies are active on post-conflict and\/or DDR issues (such as USAID, DFID, CIDA, etc.)", + "Sentence": "For this reason, it should be considered a parallel funding mechanism, even though the DDR funding structure decides how funds are used and managed; \n Parallel agency funds: Certain agencies might have programmes that could support DDR activities (e.g., food assistance for ex-combatants as part of a broader food assistance programme), or even DDR projects that fall outside the overall integrated programme framework; \n Bilateral assistance funds: Some donors, particularly those whose bilateral aid agencies are active on post-conflict and\/or DDR issues (such as USAID, DFID, CIDA, etc.)", "newParagraph": "given complexity scope ddr intervention well range stakeholder involved parallel initiative un nonun inevitable link shall created national un ddr framework ensure duplicate otherwise affect overall coherence basic requirement good coordination integrated parallel process agreement common strategic planning policy framework based national policy priority exist structurally stakeholder involved parallel initiative participate steering coordi nation committee ddr funding structure even though actual administration management fund take place outside framework avoid duplication effort ensure link operational coordination enable development aggregatedconsolidated overall budget work plan ddr normal parallel funding mechanism include following n mission financing although un peacekeeping mission key component overall un integrated structure ddr main funding mechanism assessed contri butions managed directly mission coordination dpko head quarter cannot integrated fully ddr funding structure reason considered parallel funding mechanism even though ddr funding structure decides fund used managed n parallel agency fund certain agency might programme could support ddr activity eg food assistance excombatants part broader food assistance programme even ddr project fall outside overall integrated programme framework n bilateral assistance fund donor particularly whose bilateral aid agency active postconflict andor ddr issue usaid dfid cida etc might choose finance programme parallel integrated effort directly implemented national subnational partner context important ensure donor active participant ddr funding structure involved ensure adequate operational coordination particularly ensure intended geographic area beneficiary covered programme", "ProcessedSent": "reason considered parallel funding mechanism even though ddr funding structure decides fund used managed n parallel agency fund certain agency might programme could support ddr activity eg food assistance excombatants part broader food assistance programme even ddr project fall outside overall integrated programme framework n bilateral assistance fund donor particularly whose bilateral aid agency active postconflict andor ddr issue usaid dfid cida etc", "SentID": 3218 }, { "ParagraphID": 1069, - "Paragraph": "Given the complexity and scope of DDR interventions, as well as the range of stakeholders involved, parallel initiatives, both UN and non-UN, are inevitable. Links shall be created between the national and UN DDR frameworks to ensure that these do not duplicate or otherwise affect overall coherence. The basic requirement of good coordination between integrated and parallel processes is an agreement on common strategic, planning and policy frameworks, which should be based on national policy priorities, if they exist. Structurally, stakeholders involved in parallel initiatives should participate on the steering and coordi- nation committees of the DDR funding structure, even though the actual administration and management of funds takes place outside this framework. This will avoid duplication of efforts and ensure a link to operational coordination, and enable the development of an aggregated\/consolidated overall budget and work plan for DDR. Normal parallel funding mechanisms include the following: \\n Mission financing: Although the UN peacekeeping mission is a key component of the overall UN integrated structure for DDR, its main funding mechanism (assessed contri- butions) is managed directly by the mission itself in coordination with DPKO Head- quarters, and cannot be integrated fully into the DDR funding structure. For this reason, it should be considered a parallel funding mechanism, even though the DDR funding structure decides how funds are used and managed; \\n Parallel agency funds: Certain agencies might have programmes that could support DDR activities (e.g., food assistance for ex-combatants as part of a broader food assistance programme), or even DDR projects that fall outside the overall integrated programme framework; \\n Bilateral assistance funds: Some donors, particularly those whose bilateral aid agencies are active on post-conflict and\/or DDR issues (such as USAID, DFID, CIDA, etc.) might choose to finance programmes that are parallel to integrated efforts, and which are directly implemented by national or sub-national partners. In this context, it is important to ensure that these donors are active participants in DDR and the funding structures involved, and to ensure adequate operational coordination (particularly to ensure that the intended geographic areas and beneficiaries are covered by the programme).", + "Paragraph": "Given the complexity and scope of DDR interventions, as well as the range of stakeholders involved, parallel initiatives, both UN and non-UN, are inevitable. Links shall be created between the national and UN DDR frameworks to ensure that these do not duplicate or otherwise affect overall coherence. The basic requirement of good coordination between integrated and parallel processes is an agreement on common strategic, planning and policy frameworks, which should be based on national policy priorities, if they exist. Structurally, stakeholders involved in parallel initiatives should participate on the steering and coordi- nation committees of the DDR funding structure, even though the actual administration and management of funds takes place outside this framework. This will avoid duplication of efforts and ensure a link to operational coordination, and enable the development of an aggregated\/consolidated overall budget and work plan for DDR. Normal parallel funding mechanisms include the following: \n Mission financing: Although the UN peacekeeping mission is a key component of the overall UN integrated structure for DDR, its main funding mechanism (assessed contri- butions) is managed directly by the mission itself in coordination with DPKO Head- quarters, and cannot be integrated fully into the DDR funding structure. For this reason, it should be considered a parallel funding mechanism, even though the DDR funding structure decides how funds are used and managed; \n Parallel agency funds: Certain agencies might have programmes that could support DDR activities (e.g., food assistance for ex-combatants as part of a broader food assistance programme), or even DDR projects that fall outside the overall integrated programme framework; \n Bilateral assistance funds: Some donors, particularly those whose bilateral aid agencies are active on post-conflict and\/or DDR issues (such as USAID, DFID, CIDA, etc.) might choose to finance programmes that are parallel to integrated efforts, and which are directly implemented by national or sub-national partners. In this context, it is important to ensure that these donors are active participants in DDR and the funding structures involved, and to ensure adequate operational coordination (particularly to ensure that the intended geographic areas and beneficiaries are covered by the programme).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -57961,7 +57961,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1069, - "Paragraph": "Given the complexity and scope of DDR interventions, as well as the range of stakeholders involved, parallel initiatives, both UN and non-UN, are inevitable. Links shall be created between the national and UN DDR frameworks to ensure that these do not duplicate or otherwise affect overall coherence. The basic requirement of good coordination between integrated and parallel processes is an agreement on common strategic, planning and policy frameworks, which should be based on national policy priorities, if they exist. Structurally, stakeholders involved in parallel initiatives should participate on the steering and coordi- nation committees of the DDR funding structure, even though the actual administration and management of funds takes place outside this framework. This will avoid duplication of efforts and ensure a link to operational coordination, and enable the development of an aggregated\/consolidated overall budget and work plan for DDR. Normal parallel funding mechanisms include the following: \\n Mission financing: Although the UN peacekeeping mission is a key component of the overall UN integrated structure for DDR, its main funding mechanism (assessed contri- butions) is managed directly by the mission itself in coordination with DPKO Head- quarters, and cannot be integrated fully into the DDR funding structure. For this reason, it should be considered a parallel funding mechanism, even though the DDR funding structure decides how funds are used and managed; \\n Parallel agency funds: Certain agencies might have programmes that could support DDR activities (e.g., food assistance for ex-combatants as part of a broader food assistance programme), or even DDR projects that fall outside the overall integrated programme framework; \\n Bilateral assistance funds: Some donors, particularly those whose bilateral aid agencies are active on post-conflict and\/or DDR issues (such as USAID, DFID, CIDA, etc.) might choose to finance programmes that are parallel to integrated efforts, and which are directly implemented by national or sub-national partners. In this context, it is important to ensure that these donors are active participants in DDR and the funding structures involved, and to ensure adequate operational coordination (particularly to ensure that the intended geographic areas and beneficiaries are covered by the programme).", + "Paragraph": "Given the complexity and scope of DDR interventions, as well as the range of stakeholders involved, parallel initiatives, both UN and non-UN, are inevitable. Links shall be created between the national and UN DDR frameworks to ensure that these do not duplicate or otherwise affect overall coherence. The basic requirement of good coordination between integrated and parallel processes is an agreement on common strategic, planning and policy frameworks, which should be based on national policy priorities, if they exist. Structurally, stakeholders involved in parallel initiatives should participate on the steering and coordi- nation committees of the DDR funding structure, even though the actual administration and management of funds takes place outside this framework. This will avoid duplication of efforts and ensure a link to operational coordination, and enable the development of an aggregated\/consolidated overall budget and work plan for DDR. Normal parallel funding mechanisms include the following: \n Mission financing: Although the UN peacekeeping mission is a key component of the overall UN integrated structure for DDR, its main funding mechanism (assessed contri- butions) is managed directly by the mission itself in coordination with DPKO Head- quarters, and cannot be integrated fully into the DDR funding structure. For this reason, it should be considered a parallel funding mechanism, even though the DDR funding structure decides how funds are used and managed; \n Parallel agency funds: Certain agencies might have programmes that could support DDR activities (e.g., food assistance for ex-combatants as part of a broader food assistance programme), or even DDR projects that fall outside the overall integrated programme framework; \n Bilateral assistance funds: Some donors, particularly those whose bilateral aid agencies are active on post-conflict and\/or DDR issues (such as USAID, DFID, CIDA, etc.) might choose to finance programmes that are parallel to integrated efforts, and which are directly implemented by national or sub-national partners. In this context, it is important to ensure that these donors are active participants in DDR and the funding structures involved, and to ensure adequate operational coordination (particularly to ensure that the intended geographic areas and beneficiaries are covered by the programme).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -58357,7 +58357,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1076, - "Paragraph": "In the area of DDR, both the UN (through UNDP) and the World Bank have established and managed trust funds. Experience has shown that the use of trust funds for DDR offers several advantages, including: \\n the ability to rapidly mobilize and disburse voluntary funding (especially where up- front financing is available); \\n decentralized decision-making and management systems (where trust funds are country- specific); \\n the capacity to ensure broad national oversight and ownership, through national leader- ship of the trust fund governance structure; \\n the capacity to ensure sustainability and continuity (by not being linked to the opera- tional presence of any one organization); \\n unified donor coordination and funding structures so that gaps and duplication in funding, and inconsistency in policy advice, are avoided; \\n implementation and funding methods that create transparency and accountability and bring about efficient and prompt delivery.", + "Paragraph": "In the area of DDR, both the UN (through UNDP) and the World Bank have established and managed trust funds. Experience has shown that the use of trust funds for DDR offers several advantages, including: \n the ability to rapidly mobilize and disburse voluntary funding (especially where up- front financing is available); \n decentralized decision-making and management systems (where trust funds are country- specific); \n the capacity to ensure broad national oversight and ownership, through national leader- ship of the trust fund governance structure; \n the capacity to ensure sustainability and continuity (by not being linked to the opera- tional presence of any one organization); \n unified donor coordination and funding structures so that gaps and duplication in funding, and inconsistency in policy advice, are avoided; \n implementation and funding methods that create transparency and accountability and bring about efficient and prompt delivery.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -58375,7 +58375,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1076, - "Paragraph": "In the area of DDR, both the UN (through UNDP) and the World Bank have established and managed trust funds. Experience has shown that the use of trust funds for DDR offers several advantages, including: \\n the ability to rapidly mobilize and disburse voluntary funding (especially where up- front financing is available); \\n decentralized decision-making and management systems (where trust funds are country- specific); \\n the capacity to ensure broad national oversight and ownership, through national leader- ship of the trust fund governance structure; \\n the capacity to ensure sustainability and continuity (by not being linked to the opera- tional presence of any one organization); \\n unified donor coordination and funding structures so that gaps and duplication in funding, and inconsistency in policy advice, are avoided; \\n implementation and funding methods that create transparency and accountability and bring about efficient and prompt delivery.", + "Paragraph": "In the area of DDR, both the UN (through UNDP) and the World Bank have established and managed trust funds. Experience has shown that the use of trust funds for DDR offers several advantages, including: \n the ability to rapidly mobilize and disburse voluntary funding (especially where up- front financing is available); \n decentralized decision-making and management systems (where trust funds are country- specific); \n the capacity to ensure broad national oversight and ownership, through national leader- ship of the trust fund governance structure; \n the capacity to ensure sustainability and continuity (by not being linked to the opera- tional presence of any one organization); \n unified donor coordination and funding structures so that gaps and duplication in funding, and inconsistency in policy advice, are avoided; \n implementation and funding methods that create transparency and accountability and bring about efficient and prompt delivery.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -58386,14 +58386,14 @@ "Heading2": "13.5. Fund management mechanisms and methods", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Experience has shown that the use of trust funds for DDR offers several advantages, including: \\n the ability to rapidly mobilize and disburse voluntary funding (especially where up- front financing is available); \\n decentralized decision-making and management systems (where trust funds are country- specific); \\n the capacity to ensure broad national oversight and ownership, through national leader- ship of the trust fund governance structure; \\n the capacity to ensure sustainability and continuity (by not being linked to the opera- tional presence of any one organization); \\n unified donor coordination and funding structures so that gaps and duplication in funding, and inconsistency in policy advice, are avoided; \\n implementation and funding methods that create transparency and accountability and bring about efficient and prompt delivery.", + "Sentence": "Experience has shown that the use of trust funds for DDR offers several advantages, including: \n the ability to rapidly mobilize and disburse voluntary funding (especially where up- front financing is available); \n decentralized decision-making and management systems (where trust funds are country- specific); \n the capacity to ensure broad national oversight and ownership, through national leader- ship of the trust fund governance structure; \n the capacity to ensure sustainability and continuity (by not being linked to the opera- tional presence of any one organization); \n unified donor coordination and funding structures so that gaps and duplication in funding, and inconsistency in policy advice, are avoided; \n implementation and funding methods that create transparency and accountability and bring about efficient and prompt delivery.", "newParagraph": "area ddr un undp world bank established managed trust fund experience shown use trust fund ddr offer several advantage including n ability rapidly mobilize disburse voluntary funding especially front financing available n decentralized decisionmaking management system trust fund country specific n capacity ensure broad national oversight ownership national leader ship trust fund governance structure n capacity ensure sustainability continuity linked opera tional presence one organization n unified donor coordination funding structure gap duplication funding inconsistency policy advice avoided n implementation funding method create transparency accountability bring efficient prompt delivery", "ProcessedSent": "experience shown use trust fund ddr offer several advantage including n ability rapidly mobilize disburse voluntary funding especially front financing available n decentralized decisionmaking management system trust fund country specific n capacity ensure broad national oversight ownership national leader ship trust fund governance structure n capacity ensure sustainability continuity linked opera tional presence one organization n unified donor coordination funding structure gap duplication funding inconsistency policy advice avoided n implementation funding method create transparency accountability bring efficient prompt delivery", "SentID": 3243 }, { "ParagraphID": 1077, - "Paragraph": "Funds will be allocated on the basis of a set of criteria dealing with programme objectives, activities and results, among others, which will be used by the technical and project appraisal committees when they consider individual requests for funding by UN agencies and other implementing partners. Criteria can vary depending on the funding mechanism (e.g., a reintegration trust fund will consider only those proposals directly centred on reintegration). Generic categories of criteria can include: \\n links to the general thematic sector and\/or programme objective(s); \\n the capacity and demonstrated results of the proposing organization; \\n the strength of the technical proposal; \\n cost-efficiency; \\n the involvement of national and local stakeholders; \\n the results that can be achieved.", + "Paragraph": "Funds will be allocated on the basis of a set of criteria dealing with programme objectives, activities and results, among others, which will be used by the technical and project appraisal committees when they consider individual requests for funding by UN agencies and other implementing partners. Criteria can vary depending on the funding mechanism (e.g., a reintegration trust fund will consider only those proposals directly centred on reintegration). Generic categories of criteria can include: \n links to the general thematic sector and\/or programme objective(s); \n the capacity and demonstrated results of the proposing organization; \n the strength of the technical proposal; \n cost-efficiency; \n the involvement of national and local stakeholders; \n the results that can be achieved.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -58411,7 +58411,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1077, - "Paragraph": "Funds will be allocated on the basis of a set of criteria dealing with programme objectives, activities and results, among others, which will be used by the technical and project appraisal committees when they consider individual requests for funding by UN agencies and other implementing partners. Criteria can vary depending on the funding mechanism (e.g., a reintegration trust fund will consider only those proposals directly centred on reintegration). Generic categories of criteria can include: \\n links to the general thematic sector and\/or programme objective(s); \\n the capacity and demonstrated results of the proposing organization; \\n the strength of the technical proposal; \\n cost-efficiency; \\n the involvement of national and local stakeholders; \\n the results that can be achieved.", + "Paragraph": "Funds will be allocated on the basis of a set of criteria dealing with programme objectives, activities and results, among others, which will be used by the technical and project appraisal committees when they consider individual requests for funding by UN agencies and other implementing partners. Criteria can vary depending on the funding mechanism (e.g., a reintegration trust fund will consider only those proposals directly centred on reintegration). Generic categories of criteria can include: \n links to the general thematic sector and\/or programme objective(s); \n the capacity and demonstrated results of the proposing organization; \n the strength of the technical proposal; \n cost-efficiency; \n the involvement of national and local stakeholders; \n the results that can be achieved.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -58429,7 +58429,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1077, - "Paragraph": "Funds will be allocated on the basis of a set of criteria dealing with programme objectives, activities and results, among others, which will be used by the technical and project appraisal committees when they consider individual requests for funding by UN agencies and other implementing partners. Criteria can vary depending on the funding mechanism (e.g., a reintegration trust fund will consider only those proposals directly centred on reintegration). Generic categories of criteria can include: \\n links to the general thematic sector and\/or programme objective(s); \\n the capacity and demonstrated results of the proposing organization; \\n the strength of the technical proposal; \\n cost-efficiency; \\n the involvement of national and local stakeholders; \\n the results that can be achieved.", + "Paragraph": "Funds will be allocated on the basis of a set of criteria dealing with programme objectives, activities and results, among others, which will be used by the technical and project appraisal committees when they consider individual requests for funding by UN agencies and other implementing partners. Criteria can vary depending on the funding mechanism (e.g., a reintegration trust fund will consider only those proposals directly centred on reintegration). Generic categories of criteria can include: \n links to the general thematic sector and\/or programme objective(s); \n the capacity and demonstrated results of the proposing organization; \n the strength of the technical proposal; \n cost-efficiency; \n the involvement of national and local stakeholders; \n the results that can be achieved.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -58440,7 +58440,7 @@ "Heading2": "13.6. Fund allocation criteria", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Generic categories of criteria can include: \\n links to the general thematic sector and\/or programme objective(s); \\n the capacity and demonstrated results of the proposing organization; \\n the strength of the technical proposal; \\n cost-efficiency; \\n the involvement of national and local stakeholders; \\n the results that can be achieved.", + "Sentence": "Generic categories of criteria can include: \n links to the general thematic sector and\/or programme objective(s); \n the capacity and demonstrated results of the proposing organization; \n the strength of the technical proposal; \n cost-efficiency; \n the involvement of national and local stakeholders; \n the results that can be achieved.", "newParagraph": "fund allocated basis set criterion dealing programme objective activity result among others used technical project appraisal committee consider individual request funding un agency implementing partner criterion vary depending funding mechanism eg reintegration trust fund consider proposal directly centred reintegration generic category criterion include n link general thematic sector andor programme objective n capacity demonstrated result proposing organization n strength technical proposal n costefficiency n involvement national local stakeholder n result achieved", "ProcessedSent": "generic category criterion include n link general thematic sector andor programme objective n capacity demonstrated result proposing organization n strength technical proposal n costefficiency n involvement national local stakeholder n result achieved", "SentID": 3246 @@ -58519,7 +58519,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1079, - "Paragraph": "Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions (ACABQ): The advisory body that reviews the budgets of peacekeeping missions and makes recommendations to the Fifth (Administrative and Budgetary) Committee of the General Assembly \\n Peacekeeping assessed budget: The assessed financial contribution of Member States to the operating of the UN peacekeeping missions, based on a scale established by the General Assembly. \\n Results-based budgeting (RBB): A strategic planning framework that focuses on concrete objectives, expected accomplishments and indicators of achievement for the allocation of resources. As such, the RBB aims to shift focus from output accounting (i.e., activities) to results-based accountability (indicators of achievements). \\n Voluntary contributions: This is a form of financial support that Member States pledge (often in a donors\u2019 conference) and commit on a case-by-case basis to support programme implementation. Contributions can be made to UN or non-UN trust funds. At times, donors implement their contributions through their own bilateral aid agency or directly through NGOs.", + "Paragraph": "Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions (ACABQ): The advisory body that reviews the budgets of peacekeeping missions and makes recommendations to the Fifth (Administrative and Budgetary) Committee of the General Assembly \n Peacekeeping assessed budget: The assessed financial contribution of Member States to the operating of the UN peacekeeping missions, based on a scale established by the General Assembly. \n Results-based budgeting (RBB): A strategic planning framework that focuses on concrete objectives, expected accomplishments and indicators of achievement for the allocation of resources. As such, the RBB aims to shift focus from output accounting (i.e., activities) to results-based accountability (indicators of achievements). \n Voluntary contributions: This is a form of financial support that Member States pledge (often in a donors\u2019 conference) and commit on a case-by-case basis to support programme implementation. Contributions can be made to UN or non-UN trust funds. At times, donors implement their contributions through their own bilateral aid agency or directly through NGOs.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -58530,14 +58530,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions (ACABQ): The advisory body that reviews the budgets of peacekeeping missions and makes recommendations to the Fifth (Administrative and Budgetary) Committee of the General Assembly \\n Peacekeeping assessed budget: The assessed financial contribution of Member States to the operating of the UN peacekeeping missions, based on a scale established by the General Assembly.", + "Sentence": "Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions (ACABQ): The advisory body that reviews the budgets of peacekeeping missions and makes recommendations to the Fifth (Administrative and Budgetary) Committee of the General Assembly \n Peacekeeping assessed budget: The assessed financial contribution of Member States to the operating of the UN peacekeeping missions, based on a scale established by the General Assembly.", "newParagraph": "advisory committee administrative budgetary question acabq advisory body review budget peacekeeping mission make recommendation fifth administrative budgetary committee general assembly n peacekeeping assessed budget assessed financial contribution member state operating un peacekeeping mission based scale established general assembly n resultsbased budgeting rbb strategic planning framework focus concrete objective expected accomplishment indicator achievement allocation resource rbb aim shift focus output accounting ie activity resultsbased accountability indicator achievement n voluntary contribution form financial support member state pledge often donor conference commit casebycase basis support programme implementation contribution made un nonun trust fund time donor implement contribution bilateral aid agency directly ngo", "ProcessedSent": "advisory committee administrative budgetary question acabq advisory body review budget peacekeeping mission make recommendation fifth administrative budgetary committee general assembly n peacekeeping assessed budget assessed financial contribution member state operating un peacekeeping mission based scale established general assembly", "SentID": 3251 }, { "ParagraphID": 1079, - "Paragraph": "Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions (ACABQ): The advisory body that reviews the budgets of peacekeeping missions and makes recommendations to the Fifth (Administrative and Budgetary) Committee of the General Assembly \\n Peacekeeping assessed budget: The assessed financial contribution of Member States to the operating of the UN peacekeeping missions, based on a scale established by the General Assembly. \\n Results-based budgeting (RBB): A strategic planning framework that focuses on concrete objectives, expected accomplishments and indicators of achievement for the allocation of resources. As such, the RBB aims to shift focus from output accounting (i.e., activities) to results-based accountability (indicators of achievements). \\n Voluntary contributions: This is a form of financial support that Member States pledge (often in a donors\u2019 conference) and commit on a case-by-case basis to support programme implementation. Contributions can be made to UN or non-UN trust funds. At times, donors implement their contributions through their own bilateral aid agency or directly through NGOs.", + "Paragraph": "Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions (ACABQ): The advisory body that reviews the budgets of peacekeeping missions and makes recommendations to the Fifth (Administrative and Budgetary) Committee of the General Assembly \n Peacekeeping assessed budget: The assessed financial contribution of Member States to the operating of the UN peacekeeping missions, based on a scale established by the General Assembly. \n Results-based budgeting (RBB): A strategic planning framework that focuses on concrete objectives, expected accomplishments and indicators of achievement for the allocation of resources. As such, the RBB aims to shift focus from output accounting (i.e., activities) to results-based accountability (indicators of achievements). \n Voluntary contributions: This is a form of financial support that Member States pledge (often in a donors\u2019 conference) and commit on a case-by-case basis to support programme implementation. Contributions can be made to UN or non-UN trust funds. At times, donors implement their contributions through their own bilateral aid agency or directly through NGOs.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -58548,14 +58548,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Results-based budgeting (RBB): A strategic planning framework that focuses on concrete objectives, expected accomplishments and indicators of achievement for the allocation of resources.", + "Sentence": "\n Results-based budgeting (RBB): A strategic planning framework that focuses on concrete objectives, expected accomplishments and indicators of achievement for the allocation of resources.", "newParagraph": "advisory committee administrative budgetary question acabq advisory body review budget peacekeeping mission make recommendation fifth administrative budgetary committee general assembly n peacekeeping assessed budget assessed financial contribution member state operating un peacekeeping mission based scale established general assembly n resultsbased budgeting rbb strategic planning framework focus concrete objective expected accomplishment indicator achievement allocation resource rbb aim shift focus output accounting ie activity resultsbased accountability indicator achievement n voluntary contribution form financial support member state pledge often donor conference commit casebycase basis support programme implementation contribution made un nonun trust fund time donor implement contribution bilateral aid agency directly ngo", "ProcessedSent": "n resultsbased budgeting rbb strategic planning framework focus concrete objective expected accomplishment indicator achievement allocation resource", "SentID": 3252 }, { "ParagraphID": 1079, - "Paragraph": "Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions (ACABQ): The advisory body that reviews the budgets of peacekeeping missions and makes recommendations to the Fifth (Administrative and Budgetary) Committee of the General Assembly \\n Peacekeeping assessed budget: The assessed financial contribution of Member States to the operating of the UN peacekeeping missions, based on a scale established by the General Assembly. \\n Results-based budgeting (RBB): A strategic planning framework that focuses on concrete objectives, expected accomplishments and indicators of achievement for the allocation of resources. As such, the RBB aims to shift focus from output accounting (i.e., activities) to results-based accountability (indicators of achievements). \\n Voluntary contributions: This is a form of financial support that Member States pledge (often in a donors\u2019 conference) and commit on a case-by-case basis to support programme implementation. Contributions can be made to UN or non-UN trust funds. At times, donors implement their contributions through their own bilateral aid agency or directly through NGOs.", + "Paragraph": "Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions (ACABQ): The advisory body that reviews the budgets of peacekeeping missions and makes recommendations to the Fifth (Administrative and Budgetary) Committee of the General Assembly \n Peacekeeping assessed budget: The assessed financial contribution of Member States to the operating of the UN peacekeeping missions, based on a scale established by the General Assembly. \n Results-based budgeting (RBB): A strategic planning framework that focuses on concrete objectives, expected accomplishments and indicators of achievement for the allocation of resources. As such, the RBB aims to shift focus from output accounting (i.e., activities) to results-based accountability (indicators of achievements). \n Voluntary contributions: This is a form of financial support that Member States pledge (often in a donors\u2019 conference) and commit on a case-by-case basis to support programme implementation. Contributions can be made to UN or non-UN trust funds. At times, donors implement their contributions through their own bilateral aid agency or directly through NGOs.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -58573,7 +58573,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1079, - "Paragraph": "Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions (ACABQ): The advisory body that reviews the budgets of peacekeeping missions and makes recommendations to the Fifth (Administrative and Budgetary) Committee of the General Assembly \\n Peacekeeping assessed budget: The assessed financial contribution of Member States to the operating of the UN peacekeeping missions, based on a scale established by the General Assembly. \\n Results-based budgeting (RBB): A strategic planning framework that focuses on concrete objectives, expected accomplishments and indicators of achievement for the allocation of resources. As such, the RBB aims to shift focus from output accounting (i.e., activities) to results-based accountability (indicators of achievements). \\n Voluntary contributions: This is a form of financial support that Member States pledge (often in a donors\u2019 conference) and commit on a case-by-case basis to support programme implementation. Contributions can be made to UN or non-UN trust funds. At times, donors implement their contributions through their own bilateral aid agency or directly through NGOs.", + "Paragraph": "Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions (ACABQ): The advisory body that reviews the budgets of peacekeeping missions and makes recommendations to the Fifth (Administrative and Budgetary) Committee of the General Assembly \n Peacekeeping assessed budget: The assessed financial contribution of Member States to the operating of the UN peacekeeping missions, based on a scale established by the General Assembly. \n Results-based budgeting (RBB): A strategic planning framework that focuses on concrete objectives, expected accomplishments and indicators of achievement for the allocation of resources. As such, the RBB aims to shift focus from output accounting (i.e., activities) to results-based accountability (indicators of achievements). \n Voluntary contributions: This is a form of financial support that Member States pledge (often in a donors\u2019 conference) and commit on a case-by-case basis to support programme implementation. Contributions can be made to UN or non-UN trust funds. At times, donors implement their contributions through their own bilateral aid agency or directly through NGOs.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -58584,14 +58584,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Voluntary contributions: This is a form of financial support that Member States pledge (often in a donors\u2019 conference) and commit on a case-by-case basis to support programme implementation.", + "Sentence": "\n Voluntary contributions: This is a form of financial support that Member States pledge (often in a donors\u2019 conference) and commit on a case-by-case basis to support programme implementation.", "newParagraph": "advisory committee administrative budgetary question acabq advisory body review budget peacekeeping mission make recommendation fifth administrative budgetary committee general assembly n peacekeeping assessed budget assessed financial contribution member state operating un peacekeeping mission based scale established general assembly n resultsbased budgeting rbb strategic planning framework focus concrete objective expected accomplishment indicator achievement allocation resource rbb aim shift focus output accounting ie activity resultsbased accountability indicator achievement n voluntary contribution form financial support member state pledge often donor conference commit casebycase basis support programme implementation contribution made un nonun trust fund time donor implement contribution bilateral aid agency directly ngo", "ProcessedSent": "n voluntary contribution form financial support member state pledge often donor conference commit casebycase basis support programme implementation", "SentID": 3254 }, { "ParagraphID": 1079, - "Paragraph": "Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions (ACABQ): The advisory body that reviews the budgets of peacekeeping missions and makes recommendations to the Fifth (Administrative and Budgetary) Committee of the General Assembly \\n Peacekeeping assessed budget: The assessed financial contribution of Member States to the operating of the UN peacekeeping missions, based on a scale established by the General Assembly. \\n Results-based budgeting (RBB): A strategic planning framework that focuses on concrete objectives, expected accomplishments and indicators of achievement for the allocation of resources. As such, the RBB aims to shift focus from output accounting (i.e., activities) to results-based accountability (indicators of achievements). \\n Voluntary contributions: This is a form of financial support that Member States pledge (often in a donors\u2019 conference) and commit on a case-by-case basis to support programme implementation. Contributions can be made to UN or non-UN trust funds. At times, donors implement their contributions through their own bilateral aid agency or directly through NGOs.", + "Paragraph": "Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions (ACABQ): The advisory body that reviews the budgets of peacekeeping missions and makes recommendations to the Fifth (Administrative and Budgetary) Committee of the General Assembly \n Peacekeeping assessed budget: The assessed financial contribution of Member States to the operating of the UN peacekeeping missions, based on a scale established by the General Assembly. \n Results-based budgeting (RBB): A strategic planning framework that focuses on concrete objectives, expected accomplishments and indicators of achievement for the allocation of resources. As such, the RBB aims to shift focus from output accounting (i.e., activities) to results-based accountability (indicators of achievements). \n Voluntary contributions: This is a form of financial support that Member States pledge (often in a donors\u2019 conference) and commit on a case-by-case basis to support programme implementation. Contributions can be made to UN or non-UN trust funds. At times, donors implement their contributions through their own bilateral aid agency or directly through NGOs.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -58609,7 +58609,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1079, - "Paragraph": "Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions (ACABQ): The advisory body that reviews the budgets of peacekeeping missions and makes recommendations to the Fifth (Administrative and Budgetary) Committee of the General Assembly \\n Peacekeeping assessed budget: The assessed financial contribution of Member States to the operating of the UN peacekeeping missions, based on a scale established by the General Assembly. \\n Results-based budgeting (RBB): A strategic planning framework that focuses on concrete objectives, expected accomplishments and indicators of achievement for the allocation of resources. As such, the RBB aims to shift focus from output accounting (i.e., activities) to results-based accountability (indicators of achievements). \\n Voluntary contributions: This is a form of financial support that Member States pledge (often in a donors\u2019 conference) and commit on a case-by-case basis to support programme implementation. Contributions can be made to UN or non-UN trust funds. At times, donors implement their contributions through their own bilateral aid agency or directly through NGOs.", + "Paragraph": "Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions (ACABQ): The advisory body that reviews the budgets of peacekeeping missions and makes recommendations to the Fifth (Administrative and Budgetary) Committee of the General Assembly \n Peacekeeping assessed budget: The assessed financial contribution of Member States to the operating of the UN peacekeeping missions, based on a scale established by the General Assembly. \n Results-based budgeting (RBB): A strategic planning framework that focuses on concrete objectives, expected accomplishments and indicators of achievement for the allocation of resources. As such, the RBB aims to shift focus from output accounting (i.e., activities) to results-based accountability (indicators of achievements). \n Voluntary contributions: This is a form of financial support that Member States pledge (often in a donors\u2019 conference) and commit on a case-by-case basis to support programme implementation. Contributions can be made to UN or non-UN trust funds. At times, donors implement their contributions through their own bilateral aid agency or directly through NGOs.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -58627,7 +58627,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1080, - "Paragraph": "Takes note of the note by the Secretary-General (definitions); \\n Notes that reinsertion activities are part of the disarmament and demobilization process, as outlined in the note by the Secretary-General; \\n Emphasizes that disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programmes are a critical part of peace processes and integrated peacekeeping operations, as mandated by the Security Council, and supports strengthening the coordination of those programmes in an integrated approach; \\n Stresses the importance of a clear description of respective roles of peacekeeping missions and all other relevant actors; \\n Also stresses the need for strengthened cooperation and coordination between the various actors within and outside the United Nations system to ensure effective use of resources and coherence on the ground in implementing disarmament, demobilization and reintegra- tion programmes; \\n Requests the Secretary-General, when submitting future budget proposals containing man- dated resource requirements for disarmament, demobilization and reinsertion, to provide clear information on these components and associated post and non-post costs; \\n Notes that the components used by the Secretary-General for budgeting for disarmament, demobilization and reinsertion activities are set out in the note by the Secretary-General, recognizing ongoing discussions on these concepts; \\n Notes also the intention of the Secretary-General to submit integrated disarmament, demo- bilization and reintegration standards to the General Assembly at its sixtieth session;", + "Paragraph": "Takes note of the note by the Secretary-General (definitions); \n Notes that reinsertion activities are part of the disarmament and demobilization process, as outlined in the note by the Secretary-General; \n Emphasizes that disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programmes are a critical part of peace processes and integrated peacekeeping operations, as mandated by the Security Council, and supports strengthening the coordination of those programmes in an integrated approach; \n Stresses the importance of a clear description of respective roles of peacekeeping missions and all other relevant actors; \n Also stresses the need for strengthened cooperation and coordination between the various actors within and outside the United Nations system to ensure effective use of resources and coherence on the ground in implementing disarmament, demobilization and reintegra- tion programmes; \n Requests the Secretary-General, when submitting future budget proposals containing man- dated resource requirements for disarmament, demobilization and reinsertion, to provide clear information on these components and associated post and non-post costs; \n Notes that the components used by the Secretary-General for budgeting for disarmament, demobilization and reinsertion activities are set out in the note by the Secretary-General, recognizing ongoing discussions on these concepts; \n Notes also the intention of the Secretary-General to submit integrated disarmament, demo- bilization and reintegration standards to the General Assembly at its sixtieth session;", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -58638,14 +58638,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Takes note of the note by the Secretary-General (definitions); \\n Notes that reinsertion activities are part of the disarmament and demobilization process, as outlined in the note by the Secretary-General; \\n Emphasizes that disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programmes are a critical part of peace processes and integrated peacekeeping operations, as mandated by the Security Council, and supports strengthening the coordination of those programmes in an integrated approach; \\n Stresses the importance of a clear description of respective roles of peacekeeping missions and all other relevant actors; \\n Also stresses the need for strengthened cooperation and coordination between the various actors within and outside the United Nations system to ensure effective use of resources and coherence on the ground in implementing disarmament, demobilization and reintegra- tion programmes; \\n Requests the Secretary-General, when submitting future budget proposals containing man- dated resource requirements for disarmament, demobilization and reinsertion, to provide clear information on these components and associated post and non-post costs; \\n Notes that the components used by the Secretary-General for budgeting for disarmament, demobilization and reinsertion activities are set out in the note by the Secretary-General, recognizing ongoing discussions on these concepts; \\n Notes also the intention of the Secretary-General to submit integrated disarmament, demo- bilization and reintegration standards to the General Assembly at its sixtieth session;", + "Sentence": "Takes note of the note by the Secretary-General (definitions); \n Notes that reinsertion activities are part of the disarmament and demobilization process, as outlined in the note by the Secretary-General; \n Emphasizes that disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programmes are a critical part of peace processes and integrated peacekeeping operations, as mandated by the Security Council, and supports strengthening the coordination of those programmes in an integrated approach; \n Stresses the importance of a clear description of respective roles of peacekeeping missions and all other relevant actors; \n Also stresses the need for strengthened cooperation and coordination between the various actors within and outside the United Nations system to ensure effective use of resources and coherence on the ground in implementing disarmament, demobilization and reintegra- tion programmes; \n Requests the Secretary-General, when submitting future budget proposals containing man- dated resource requirements for disarmament, demobilization and reinsertion, to provide clear information on these components and associated post and non-post costs; \n Notes that the components used by the Secretary-General for budgeting for disarmament, demobilization and reinsertion activities are set out in the note by the Secretary-General, recognizing ongoing discussions on these concepts; \n Notes also the intention of the Secretary-General to submit integrated disarmament, demo- bilization and reintegration standards to the General Assembly at its sixtieth session;", "newParagraph": "take note note secretarygeneral definition n note reinsertion activity part disarmament demobilization process outlined note secretarygeneral n emphasizes disarmament demobilization reintegration programme critical part peace process integrated peacekeeping operation mandated security council support strengthening coordination programme integrated approach n stress importance clear description respective role peacekeeping mission relevant actor n also stress need strengthened cooperation coordination various actor within outside united nation system ensure effective use resource coherence ground implementing disarmament demobilization reintegra tion programme n request secretarygeneral submitting future budget proposal containing man dated resource requirement disarmament demobilization reinsertion provide clear information component associated post nonpost cost n note component used secretarygeneral budgeting disarmament demobilization reinsertion activity set note secretarygeneral recognizing ongoing discussion concept n note also intention secretarygeneral submit integrated disarmament demo bilization reintegration standard general assembly sixtieth session", "ProcessedSent": "take note note secretarygeneral definition n note reinsertion activity part disarmament demobilization process outlined note secretarygeneral n emphasizes disarmament demobilization reintegration programme critical part peace process integrated peacekeeping operation mandated security council support strengthening coordination programme integrated approach n stress importance clear description respective role peacekeeping mission relevant actor n also stress need strengthened cooperation coordination various actor within outside united nation system ensure effective use resource coherence ground implementing disarmament demobilization reintegra tion programme n request secretarygeneral submitting future budget proposal containing man dated resource requirement disarmament demobilization reinsertion provide clear information component associated post nonpost cost n note component used secretarygeneral budgeting disarmament demobilization reinsertion activity set note secretarygeneral recognizing ongoing discussion concept n note also intention secretarygeneral submit integrated disarmament demo bilization reintegration standard general assembly sixtieth session", "SentID": 3257 }, { "ParagraphID": 1081, - "Paragraph": "DDR objective statement. The DDR objective statement draws its legal foundation from Security Council mission mandates. It is important to note that the DDR objective will not be fully achieved in the lifetime of the peacekeeping mission, although certain specific activities such as the (limited) physical disarmament of combatants may be completed. Other important aspects of DDR such as reintegration, establishment of the legal framework, and the technical and logistic capacity to destroy or make safe small arms and light weapons all extend beyond the duration of a peacekeeping mission. In this regard, the objective statement must reflect the contribution of the peacekeeping mission to the \u2018progress towards\u2019 the DDR objective. \\n SAMPLE DDR OBJECTIVE STATEMENT \\n \u2018Progress towards the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of members of armed forces and groups, including meeting the specific needs of women and children associated with such groups, as well as weapons control and destruction\u2019", + "Paragraph": "DDR objective statement. The DDR objective statement draws its legal foundation from Security Council mission mandates. It is important to note that the DDR objective will not be fully achieved in the lifetime of the peacekeeping mission, although certain specific activities such as the (limited) physical disarmament of combatants may be completed. Other important aspects of DDR such as reintegration, establishment of the legal framework, and the technical and logistic capacity to destroy or make safe small arms and light weapons all extend beyond the duration of a peacekeeping mission. In this regard, the objective statement must reflect the contribution of the peacekeeping mission to the \u2018progress towards\u2019 the DDR objective. \n SAMPLE DDR OBJECTIVE STATEMENT \n \u2018Progress towards the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of members of armed forces and groups, including meeting the specific needs of women and children associated with such groups, as well as weapons control and destruction\u2019", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -58663,7 +58663,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1081, - "Paragraph": "DDR objective statement. The DDR objective statement draws its legal foundation from Security Council mission mandates. It is important to note that the DDR objective will not be fully achieved in the lifetime of the peacekeeping mission, although certain specific activities such as the (limited) physical disarmament of combatants may be completed. Other important aspects of DDR such as reintegration, establishment of the legal framework, and the technical and logistic capacity to destroy or make safe small arms and light weapons all extend beyond the duration of a peacekeeping mission. In this regard, the objective statement must reflect the contribution of the peacekeeping mission to the \u2018progress towards\u2019 the DDR objective. \\n SAMPLE DDR OBJECTIVE STATEMENT \\n \u2018Progress towards the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of members of armed forces and groups, including meeting the specific needs of women and children associated with such groups, as well as weapons control and destruction\u2019", + "Paragraph": "DDR objective statement. The DDR objective statement draws its legal foundation from Security Council mission mandates. It is important to note that the DDR objective will not be fully achieved in the lifetime of the peacekeeping mission, although certain specific activities such as the (limited) physical disarmament of combatants may be completed. Other important aspects of DDR such as reintegration, establishment of the legal framework, and the technical and logistic capacity to destroy or make safe small arms and light weapons all extend beyond the duration of a peacekeeping mission. In this regard, the objective statement must reflect the contribution of the peacekeeping mission to the \u2018progress towards\u2019 the DDR objective. \n SAMPLE DDR OBJECTIVE STATEMENT \n \u2018Progress towards the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of members of armed forces and groups, including meeting the specific needs of women and children associated with such groups, as well as weapons control and destruction\u2019", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -58681,7 +58681,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1081, - "Paragraph": "DDR objective statement. The DDR objective statement draws its legal foundation from Security Council mission mandates. It is important to note that the DDR objective will not be fully achieved in the lifetime of the peacekeeping mission, although certain specific activities such as the (limited) physical disarmament of combatants may be completed. Other important aspects of DDR such as reintegration, establishment of the legal framework, and the technical and logistic capacity to destroy or make safe small arms and light weapons all extend beyond the duration of a peacekeeping mission. In this regard, the objective statement must reflect the contribution of the peacekeeping mission to the \u2018progress towards\u2019 the DDR objective. \\n SAMPLE DDR OBJECTIVE STATEMENT \\n \u2018Progress towards the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of members of armed forces and groups, including meeting the specific needs of women and children associated with such groups, as well as weapons control and destruction\u2019", + "Paragraph": "DDR objective statement. The DDR objective statement draws its legal foundation from Security Council mission mandates. It is important to note that the DDR objective will not be fully achieved in the lifetime of the peacekeeping mission, although certain specific activities such as the (limited) physical disarmament of combatants may be completed. Other important aspects of DDR such as reintegration, establishment of the legal framework, and the technical and logistic capacity to destroy or make safe small arms and light weapons all extend beyond the duration of a peacekeeping mission. In this regard, the objective statement must reflect the contribution of the peacekeeping mission to the \u2018progress towards\u2019 the DDR objective. \n SAMPLE DDR OBJECTIVE STATEMENT \n \u2018Progress towards the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of members of armed forces and groups, including meeting the specific needs of women and children associated with such groups, as well as weapons control and destruction\u2019", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -58699,7 +58699,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1081, - "Paragraph": "DDR objective statement. The DDR objective statement draws its legal foundation from Security Council mission mandates. It is important to note that the DDR objective will not be fully achieved in the lifetime of the peacekeeping mission, although certain specific activities such as the (limited) physical disarmament of combatants may be completed. Other important aspects of DDR such as reintegration, establishment of the legal framework, and the technical and logistic capacity to destroy or make safe small arms and light weapons all extend beyond the duration of a peacekeeping mission. In this regard, the objective statement must reflect the contribution of the peacekeeping mission to the \u2018progress towards\u2019 the DDR objective. \\n SAMPLE DDR OBJECTIVE STATEMENT \\n \u2018Progress towards the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of members of armed forces and groups, including meeting the specific needs of women and children associated with such groups, as well as weapons control and destruction\u2019", + "Paragraph": "DDR objective statement. The DDR objective statement draws its legal foundation from Security Council mission mandates. It is important to note that the DDR objective will not be fully achieved in the lifetime of the peacekeeping mission, although certain specific activities such as the (limited) physical disarmament of combatants may be completed. Other important aspects of DDR such as reintegration, establishment of the legal framework, and the technical and logistic capacity to destroy or make safe small arms and light weapons all extend beyond the duration of a peacekeeping mission. In this regard, the objective statement must reflect the contribution of the peacekeeping mission to the \u2018progress towards\u2019 the DDR objective. \n SAMPLE DDR OBJECTIVE STATEMENT \n \u2018Progress towards the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of members of armed forces and groups, including meeting the specific needs of women and children associated with such groups, as well as weapons control and destruction\u2019", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -58717,7 +58717,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1081, - "Paragraph": "DDR objective statement. The DDR objective statement draws its legal foundation from Security Council mission mandates. It is important to note that the DDR objective will not be fully achieved in the lifetime of the peacekeeping mission, although certain specific activities such as the (limited) physical disarmament of combatants may be completed. Other important aspects of DDR such as reintegration, establishment of the legal framework, and the technical and logistic capacity to destroy or make safe small arms and light weapons all extend beyond the duration of a peacekeeping mission. In this regard, the objective statement must reflect the contribution of the peacekeeping mission to the \u2018progress towards\u2019 the DDR objective. \\n SAMPLE DDR OBJECTIVE STATEMENT \\n \u2018Progress towards the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of members of armed forces and groups, including meeting the specific needs of women and children associated with such groups, as well as weapons control and destruction\u2019", + "Paragraph": "DDR objective statement. The DDR objective statement draws its legal foundation from Security Council mission mandates. It is important to note that the DDR objective will not be fully achieved in the lifetime of the peacekeeping mission, although certain specific activities such as the (limited) physical disarmament of combatants may be completed. Other important aspects of DDR such as reintegration, establishment of the legal framework, and the technical and logistic capacity to destroy or make safe small arms and light weapons all extend beyond the duration of a peacekeeping mission. In this regard, the objective statement must reflect the contribution of the peacekeeping mission to the \u2018progress towards\u2019 the DDR objective. \n SAMPLE DDR OBJECTIVE STATEMENT \n \u2018Progress towards the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of members of armed forces and groups, including meeting the specific needs of women and children associated with such groups, as well as weapons control and destruction\u2019", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -58735,7 +58735,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1081, - "Paragraph": "DDR objective statement. The DDR objective statement draws its legal foundation from Security Council mission mandates. It is important to note that the DDR objective will not be fully achieved in the lifetime of the peacekeeping mission, although certain specific activities such as the (limited) physical disarmament of combatants may be completed. Other important aspects of DDR such as reintegration, establishment of the legal framework, and the technical and logistic capacity to destroy or make safe small arms and light weapons all extend beyond the duration of a peacekeeping mission. In this regard, the objective statement must reflect the contribution of the peacekeeping mission to the \u2018progress towards\u2019 the DDR objective. \\n SAMPLE DDR OBJECTIVE STATEMENT \\n \u2018Progress towards the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of members of armed forces and groups, including meeting the specific needs of women and children associated with such groups, as well as weapons control and destruction\u2019", + "Paragraph": "DDR objective statement. The DDR objective statement draws its legal foundation from Security Council mission mandates. It is important to note that the DDR objective will not be fully achieved in the lifetime of the peacekeeping mission, although certain specific activities such as the (limited) physical disarmament of combatants may be completed. Other important aspects of DDR such as reintegration, establishment of the legal framework, and the technical and logistic capacity to destroy or make safe small arms and light weapons all extend beyond the duration of a peacekeeping mission. In this regard, the objective statement must reflect the contribution of the peacekeeping mission to the \u2018progress towards\u2019 the DDR objective. \n SAMPLE DDR OBJECTIVE STATEMENT \n \u2018Progress towards the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of members of armed forces and groups, including meeting the specific needs of women and children associated with such groups, as well as weapons control and destruction\u2019", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -58746,7 +58746,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n SAMPLE DDR OBJECTIVE STATEMENT \\n \u2018Progress towards the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of members of armed forces and groups, including meeting the specific needs of women and children associated with such groups, as well as weapons control and destruction\u2019", + "Sentence": "\n SAMPLE DDR OBJECTIVE STATEMENT \n \u2018Progress towards the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of members of armed forces and groups, including meeting the specific needs of women and children associated with such groups, as well as weapons control and destruction\u2019", "newParagraph": "ddr objective statement ddr objective statement draw legal foundation security council mission mandate important note ddr objective fully achieved lifetime peacekeeping mission although certain specific activity limited physical disarmament combatant may completed important aspect ddr reintegration establishment legal framework technical logistic capacity destroy make safe small arm light weapon extend beyond duration peacekeeping mission regard objective statement must reflect contribution peacekeeping mission progress towards ddr objective n sample ddr objective statement n progress towards disarmament demobilization reintegration member armed force group including meeting specific need woman child associated group well weapon control destruction ", "ProcessedSent": "n sample ddr objective statement n progress towards disarmament demobilization reintegration member armed force group including meeting specific need woman child associated group well weapon control destruction ", "SentID": 3263 @@ -58789,7 +58789,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1083, - "Paragraph": "SAMPLE SET OF DDR INDICATORS OF ACHIEVEMENT \\n \u2018Transitional Government of National Unity adopts legislation establishing national and subnational DDR institutions, and related weapons control law\u2019 \\n \u2018Establishment of national and sub-national DDR authorities\u2019 \\n \u2018Development of a national DDR programme\u2019 \\n \u201834,000 members of armed forces and groups participate in disarmament, demobilization and community-based reintegration programmes, including 14,000 children released to return to their families\u2019 \\n \u2018Destroyed 4,000 of an estimated 20,000 weapons established in a small arms baseline survey conducted in January 2005\u2019", + "Paragraph": "SAMPLE SET OF DDR INDICATORS OF ACHIEVEMENT \n \u2018Transitional Government of National Unity adopts legislation establishing national and subnational DDR institutions, and related weapons control law\u2019 \n \u2018Establishment of national and sub-national DDR authorities\u2019 \n \u2018Development of a national DDR programme\u2019 \n \u201834,000 members of armed forces and groups participate in disarmament, demobilization and community-based reintegration programmes, including 14,000 children released to return to their families\u2019 \n \u2018Destroyed 4,000 of an estimated 20,000 weapons established in a small arms baseline survey conducted in January 2005\u2019", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -58800,7 +58800,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "SAMPLE SET OF DDR INDICATORS OF ACHIEVEMENT \\n \u2018Transitional Government of National Unity adopts legislation establishing national and subnational DDR institutions, and related weapons control law\u2019 \\n \u2018Establishment of national and sub-national DDR authorities\u2019 \\n \u2018Development of a national DDR programme\u2019 \\n \u201834,000 members of armed forces and groups participate in disarmament, demobilization and community-based reintegration programmes, including 14,000 children released to return to their families\u2019 \\n \u2018Destroyed 4,000 of an estimated 20,000 weapons established in a small arms baseline survey conducted in January 2005\u2019", + "Sentence": "SAMPLE SET OF DDR INDICATORS OF ACHIEVEMENT \n \u2018Transitional Government of National Unity adopts legislation establishing national and subnational DDR institutions, and related weapons control law\u2019 \n \u2018Establishment of national and sub-national DDR authorities\u2019 \n \u2018Development of a national DDR programme\u2019 \n \u201834,000 members of armed forces and groups participate in disarmament, demobilization and community-based reintegration programmes, including 14,000 children released to return to their families\u2019 \n \u2018Destroyed 4,000 of an estimated 20,000 weapons established in a small arms baseline survey conducted in January 2005\u2019", "newParagraph": "sample set ddr indicator achievement n transitional government national unity adopts legislation establishing national subnational ddr institution related weapon control law n establishment national subnational ddr authority n development national ddr programme n 34000 member armed force group participate disarmament demobilization communitybased reintegration programme including 14000 child released return family n destroyed 4000 estimated 20000 weapon established small arm baseline survey conducted january 2005 ", "ProcessedSent": "sample set ddr indicator achievement n transitional government national unity adopts legislation establishing national subnational ddr institution related weapon control law n establishment national subnational ddr authority n development national ddr programme n 34000 member armed force group participate disarmament demobilization communitybased reintegration programme including 14000 child released return family n destroyed 4000 estimated 20000 weapon established small arm baseline survey conducted january 2005 ", "SentID": 3266 @@ -58843,7 +58843,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1085, - "Paragraph": "SAMPLE SET OF DDR OUTPUTS \\n \u2018Provided technical support (advice and programme development support) to the National DDR Coordination Council (NDDRCC), regional DDR commissions and their field structures, in collaboration with international financial institutions, international development organizations, non-governmental organizations and donors, in the development and implementation of a national DDR programme for all armed forces and groups\u2019 \\n \u2018Provided technical support (advice and programme development support) to assist the government in strengthening its capacity (legal, institutional, technical and physical) in the areas of weapons collection, control, management and destruction\u2019 \\n \u2018Conducted 10 training courses on DDR and weapons control for the military and civilian authorities in the first 6 months of the mission mandate\u2019 \\n \u2018Supported the DDR institutions to collect, store, control and destroy (where applicable and necessary) weapons, as part of the DDR programme\u2019 \\n \u2018Conducted with the DDR institutions and in partnership with international research institutions, small arms survey, economic and market surveys, verification of the size of the DDR caseload and eligibility criteria to support the planning of a comprehensive DDR programme in x\u2019 \\n \u2018Developed options (eligibility criteria, encampment options and integration in civil administration) for force reduction process for the government of national unity\u2019 \\n \u2018Disarmed and demobilized 15,000 allied militia forces, including provided related services such as feeding, clothing, civic education, medical profiling and counselling, education, training and employment referral, transitional safety allowance, training material\u2019 \\n \u2018Disarmed and demobilized 5,000 members of special groups (women, disabled and veterans), including provided related services such as feeding, clothing, civic education, medical, profiling and counselling, education, training and employment referral, transitional safety allowance, training material\u2019 \\n \u2018Negotiated and secured the release of 14,000 (UNICEF estimate) children associated with the armed forces and groups, and facilitated their return to their families within 12 months of the mission\u2019s mandate\u2019 \\n \u2018Developed, coordinated and implemented reinsertion support at the community level for 34,000 armed individuals, as well as individuals associated with the armed forces and groups (women and children), in collaboration with the national DDR institutions, and other UN funds, programmes and agencies. Community-based DDR projects include: transitional support programmes; labour-intensive public works; microenterprise support; training; and short-term education support\u2019 \\n \u2018Developed, coordinated and implemented community-based weapons for quick-impact projects programmes in 40 communities in x\u2019 \\n \u2018Developed and implemented a DDR and small arms sensitization and community mobilization programme in 6 counties of x, inter alia, to develop consensus and support for the national DDR programme at national, regional and local levels, and in particular to encourage the participation of women in the DDR programme\u2019 \\n \u2018Organized 10 regional workshops on DDR with x\u2019s military and civilian authorities\u2019", + "Paragraph": "SAMPLE SET OF DDR OUTPUTS \n \u2018Provided technical support (advice and programme development support) to the National DDR Coordination Council (NDDRCC), regional DDR commissions and their field structures, in collaboration with international financial institutions, international development organizations, non-governmental organizations and donors, in the development and implementation of a national DDR programme for all armed forces and groups\u2019 \n \u2018Provided technical support (advice and programme development support) to assist the government in strengthening its capacity (legal, institutional, technical and physical) in the areas of weapons collection, control, management and destruction\u2019 \n \u2018Conducted 10 training courses on DDR and weapons control for the military and civilian authorities in the first 6 months of the mission mandate\u2019 \n \u2018Supported the DDR institutions to collect, store, control and destroy (where applicable and necessary) weapons, as part of the DDR programme\u2019 \n \u2018Conducted with the DDR institutions and in partnership with international research institutions, small arms survey, economic and market surveys, verification of the size of the DDR caseload and eligibility criteria to support the planning of a comprehensive DDR programme in x\u2019 \n \u2018Developed options (eligibility criteria, encampment options and integration in civil administration) for force reduction process for the government of national unity\u2019 \n \u2018Disarmed and demobilized 15,000 allied militia forces, including provided related services such as feeding, clothing, civic education, medical profiling and counselling, education, training and employment referral, transitional safety allowance, training material\u2019 \n \u2018Disarmed and demobilized 5,000 members of special groups (women, disabled and veterans), including provided related services such as feeding, clothing, civic education, medical, profiling and counselling, education, training and employment referral, transitional safety allowance, training material\u2019 \n \u2018Negotiated and secured the release of 14,000 (UNICEF estimate) children associated with the armed forces and groups, and facilitated their return to their families within 12 months of the mission\u2019s mandate\u2019 \n \u2018Developed, coordinated and implemented reinsertion support at the community level for 34,000 armed individuals, as well as individuals associated with the armed forces and groups (women and children), in collaboration with the national DDR institutions, and other UN funds, programmes and agencies. Community-based DDR projects include: transitional support programmes; labour-intensive public works; microenterprise support; training; and short-term education support\u2019 \n \u2018Developed, coordinated and implemented community-based weapons for quick-impact projects programmes in 40 communities in x\u2019 \n \u2018Developed and implemented a DDR and small arms sensitization and community mobilization programme in 6 counties of x, inter alia, to develop consensus and support for the national DDR programme at national, regional and local levels, and in particular to encourage the participation of women in the DDR programme\u2019 \n \u2018Organized 10 regional workshops on DDR with x\u2019s military and civilian authorities\u2019", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -58854,14 +58854,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "SAMPLE SET OF DDR OUTPUTS \\n \u2018Provided technical support (advice and programme development support) to the National DDR Coordination Council (NDDRCC), regional DDR commissions and their field structures, in collaboration with international financial institutions, international development organizations, non-governmental organizations and donors, in the development and implementation of a national DDR programme for all armed forces and groups\u2019 \\n \u2018Provided technical support (advice and programme development support) to assist the government in strengthening its capacity (legal, institutional, technical and physical) in the areas of weapons collection, control, management and destruction\u2019 \\n \u2018Conducted 10 training courses on DDR and weapons control for the military and civilian authorities in the first 6 months of the mission mandate\u2019 \\n \u2018Supported the DDR institutions to collect, store, control and destroy (where applicable and necessary) weapons, as part of the DDR programme\u2019 \\n \u2018Conducted with the DDR institutions and in partnership with international research institutions, small arms survey, economic and market surveys, verification of the size of the DDR caseload and eligibility criteria to support the planning of a comprehensive DDR programme in x\u2019 \\n \u2018Developed options (eligibility criteria, encampment options and integration in civil administration) for force reduction process for the government of national unity\u2019 \\n \u2018Disarmed and demobilized 15,000 allied militia forces, including provided related services such as feeding, clothing, civic education, medical profiling and counselling, education, training and employment referral, transitional safety allowance, training material\u2019 \\n \u2018Disarmed and demobilized 5,000 members of special groups (women, disabled and veterans), including provided related services such as feeding, clothing, civic education, medical, profiling and counselling, education, training and employment referral, transitional safety allowance, training material\u2019 \\n \u2018Negotiated and secured the release of 14,000 (UNICEF estimate) children associated with the armed forces and groups, and facilitated their return to their families within 12 months of the mission\u2019s mandate\u2019 \\n \u2018Developed, coordinated and implemented reinsertion support at the community level for 34,000 armed individuals, as well as individuals associated with the armed forces and groups (women and children), in collaboration with the national DDR institutions, and other UN funds, programmes and agencies.", + "Sentence": "SAMPLE SET OF DDR OUTPUTS \n \u2018Provided technical support (advice and programme development support) to the National DDR Coordination Council (NDDRCC), regional DDR commissions and their field structures, in collaboration with international financial institutions, international development organizations, non-governmental organizations and donors, in the development and implementation of a national DDR programme for all armed forces and groups\u2019 \n \u2018Provided technical support (advice and programme development support) to assist the government in strengthening its capacity (legal, institutional, technical and physical) in the areas of weapons collection, control, management and destruction\u2019 \n \u2018Conducted 10 training courses on DDR and weapons control for the military and civilian authorities in the first 6 months of the mission mandate\u2019 \n \u2018Supported the DDR institutions to collect, store, control and destroy (where applicable and necessary) weapons, as part of the DDR programme\u2019 \n \u2018Conducted with the DDR institutions and in partnership with international research institutions, small arms survey, economic and market surveys, verification of the size of the DDR caseload and eligibility criteria to support the planning of a comprehensive DDR programme in x\u2019 \n \u2018Developed options (eligibility criteria, encampment options and integration in civil administration) for force reduction process for the government of national unity\u2019 \n \u2018Disarmed and demobilized 15,000 allied militia forces, including provided related services such as feeding, clothing, civic education, medical profiling and counselling, education, training and employment referral, transitional safety allowance, training material\u2019 \n \u2018Disarmed and demobilized 5,000 members of special groups (women, disabled and veterans), including provided related services such as feeding, clothing, civic education, medical, profiling and counselling, education, training and employment referral, transitional safety allowance, training material\u2019 \n \u2018Negotiated and secured the release of 14,000 (UNICEF estimate) children associated with the armed forces and groups, and facilitated their return to their families within 12 months of the mission\u2019s mandate\u2019 \n \u2018Developed, coordinated and implemented reinsertion support at the community level for 34,000 armed individuals, as well as individuals associated with the armed forces and groups (women and children), in collaboration with the national DDR institutions, and other UN funds, programmes and agencies.", "newParagraph": "sample set ddr output n provided technical support advice programme development support national ddr coordination council nddrcc regional ddr commission field structure collaboration international financial institution international development organization nongovernmental organization donor development implementation national ddr programme armed force group n provided technical support advice programme development support assist government strengthening capacity legal institutional technical physical area weapon collection control management destruction n conducted 10 training course ddr weapon control military civilian authority first 6 month mission mandate n supported ddr institution collect store control destroy applicable necessary weapon part ddr programme n conducted ddr institution partnership international research institution small arm survey economic market survey verification size ddr caseload eligibility criterion support planning comprehensive ddr programme x n developed option eligibility criterion encampment option integration civil administration force reduction process government national unity n disarmed demobilized 15000 allied militia force including provided related service feeding clothing civic education medical profiling counselling education training employment referral transitional safety allowance training material n disarmed demobilized 5000 member special group woman disabled veteran including provided related service feeding clothing civic education medical profiling counselling education training employment referral transitional safety allowance training material n negotiated secured release 14000 unicef estimate child associated armed force group facilitated return family within 12 month mission mandate n developed coordinated implemented reinsertion support community level 34000 armed individual well individual associated armed force group woman child collaboration national ddr institution un fund programme agency communitybased ddr project include transitional support programme labourintensive public work microenterprise support training shortterm education support n developed coordinated implemented communitybased weapon quickimpact project programme 40 community x n developed implemented ddr small arm sensitization community mobilization programme 6 county x inter alia develop consensus support national ddr programme national regional local level particular encourage participation woman ddr programme n organized 10 regional workshop ddr x military civilian authority ", "ProcessedSent": "sample set ddr output n provided technical support advice programme development support national ddr coordination council nddrcc regional ddr commission field structure collaboration international financial institution international development organization nongovernmental organization donor development implementation national ddr programme armed force group n provided technical support advice programme development support assist government strengthening capacity legal institutional technical physical area weapon collection control management destruction n conducted 10 training course ddr weapon control military civilian authority first 6 month mission mandate n supported ddr institution collect store control destroy applicable necessary weapon part ddr programme n conducted ddr institution partnership international research institution small arm survey economic market survey verification size ddr caseload eligibility criterion support planning comprehensive ddr programme x n developed option eligibility criterion encampment option integration civil administration force reduction process government national unity n disarmed demobilized 15000 allied militia force including provided related service feeding clothing civic education medical profiling counselling education training employment referral transitional safety allowance training material n disarmed demobilized 5000 member special group woman disabled veteran including provided related service feeding clothing civic education medical profiling counselling education training employment referral transitional safety allowance training material n negotiated secured release 14000 unicef estimate child associated armed force group facilitated return family within 12 month mission mandate n developed coordinated implemented reinsertion support community level 34000 armed individual well individual associated armed force group woman child collaboration national ddr institution un fund programme agency", "SentID": 3269 }, { "ParagraphID": 1085, - "Paragraph": "SAMPLE SET OF DDR OUTPUTS \\n \u2018Provided technical support (advice and programme development support) to the National DDR Coordination Council (NDDRCC), regional DDR commissions and their field structures, in collaboration with international financial institutions, international development organizations, non-governmental organizations and donors, in the development and implementation of a national DDR programme for all armed forces and groups\u2019 \\n \u2018Provided technical support (advice and programme development support) to assist the government in strengthening its capacity (legal, institutional, technical and physical) in the areas of weapons collection, control, management and destruction\u2019 \\n \u2018Conducted 10 training courses on DDR and weapons control for the military and civilian authorities in the first 6 months of the mission mandate\u2019 \\n \u2018Supported the DDR institutions to collect, store, control and destroy (where applicable and necessary) weapons, as part of the DDR programme\u2019 \\n \u2018Conducted with the DDR institutions and in partnership with international research institutions, small arms survey, economic and market surveys, verification of the size of the DDR caseload and eligibility criteria to support the planning of a comprehensive DDR programme in x\u2019 \\n \u2018Developed options (eligibility criteria, encampment options and integration in civil administration) for force reduction process for the government of national unity\u2019 \\n \u2018Disarmed and demobilized 15,000 allied militia forces, including provided related services such as feeding, clothing, civic education, medical profiling and counselling, education, training and employment referral, transitional safety allowance, training material\u2019 \\n \u2018Disarmed and demobilized 5,000 members of special groups (women, disabled and veterans), including provided related services such as feeding, clothing, civic education, medical, profiling and counselling, education, training and employment referral, transitional safety allowance, training material\u2019 \\n \u2018Negotiated and secured the release of 14,000 (UNICEF estimate) children associated with the armed forces and groups, and facilitated their return to their families within 12 months of the mission\u2019s mandate\u2019 \\n \u2018Developed, coordinated and implemented reinsertion support at the community level for 34,000 armed individuals, as well as individuals associated with the armed forces and groups (women and children), in collaboration with the national DDR institutions, and other UN funds, programmes and agencies. Community-based DDR projects include: transitional support programmes; labour-intensive public works; microenterprise support; training; and short-term education support\u2019 \\n \u2018Developed, coordinated and implemented community-based weapons for quick-impact projects programmes in 40 communities in x\u2019 \\n \u2018Developed and implemented a DDR and small arms sensitization and community mobilization programme in 6 counties of x, inter alia, to develop consensus and support for the national DDR programme at national, regional and local levels, and in particular to encourage the participation of women in the DDR programme\u2019 \\n \u2018Organized 10 regional workshops on DDR with x\u2019s military and civilian authorities\u2019", + "Paragraph": "SAMPLE SET OF DDR OUTPUTS \n \u2018Provided technical support (advice and programme development support) to the National DDR Coordination Council (NDDRCC), regional DDR commissions and their field structures, in collaboration with international financial institutions, international development organizations, non-governmental organizations and donors, in the development and implementation of a national DDR programme for all armed forces and groups\u2019 \n \u2018Provided technical support (advice and programme development support) to assist the government in strengthening its capacity (legal, institutional, technical and physical) in the areas of weapons collection, control, management and destruction\u2019 \n \u2018Conducted 10 training courses on DDR and weapons control for the military and civilian authorities in the first 6 months of the mission mandate\u2019 \n \u2018Supported the DDR institutions to collect, store, control and destroy (where applicable and necessary) weapons, as part of the DDR programme\u2019 \n \u2018Conducted with the DDR institutions and in partnership with international research institutions, small arms survey, economic and market surveys, verification of the size of the DDR caseload and eligibility criteria to support the planning of a comprehensive DDR programme in x\u2019 \n \u2018Developed options (eligibility criteria, encampment options and integration in civil administration) for force reduction process for the government of national unity\u2019 \n \u2018Disarmed and demobilized 15,000 allied militia forces, including provided related services such as feeding, clothing, civic education, medical profiling and counselling, education, training and employment referral, transitional safety allowance, training material\u2019 \n \u2018Disarmed and demobilized 5,000 members of special groups (women, disabled and veterans), including provided related services such as feeding, clothing, civic education, medical, profiling and counselling, education, training and employment referral, transitional safety allowance, training material\u2019 \n \u2018Negotiated and secured the release of 14,000 (UNICEF estimate) children associated with the armed forces and groups, and facilitated their return to their families within 12 months of the mission\u2019s mandate\u2019 \n \u2018Developed, coordinated and implemented reinsertion support at the community level for 34,000 armed individuals, as well as individuals associated with the armed forces and groups (women and children), in collaboration with the national DDR institutions, and other UN funds, programmes and agencies. Community-based DDR projects include: transitional support programmes; labour-intensive public works; microenterprise support; training; and short-term education support\u2019 \n \u2018Developed, coordinated and implemented community-based weapons for quick-impact projects programmes in 40 communities in x\u2019 \n \u2018Developed and implemented a DDR and small arms sensitization and community mobilization programme in 6 counties of x, inter alia, to develop consensus and support for the national DDR programme at national, regional and local levels, and in particular to encourage the participation of women in the DDR programme\u2019 \n \u2018Organized 10 regional workshops on DDR with x\u2019s military and civilian authorities\u2019", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -58872,7 +58872,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Community-based DDR projects include: transitional support programmes; labour-intensive public works; microenterprise support; training; and short-term education support\u2019 \\n \u2018Developed, coordinated and implemented community-based weapons for quick-impact projects programmes in 40 communities in x\u2019 \\n \u2018Developed and implemented a DDR and small arms sensitization and community mobilization programme in 6 counties of x, inter alia, to develop consensus and support for the national DDR programme at national, regional and local levels, and in particular to encourage the participation of women in the DDR programme\u2019 \\n \u2018Organized 10 regional workshops on DDR with x\u2019s military and civilian authorities\u2019", + "Sentence": "Community-based DDR projects include: transitional support programmes; labour-intensive public works; microenterprise support; training; and short-term education support\u2019 \n \u2018Developed, coordinated and implemented community-based weapons for quick-impact projects programmes in 40 communities in x\u2019 \n \u2018Developed and implemented a DDR and small arms sensitization and community mobilization programme in 6 counties of x, inter alia, to develop consensus and support for the national DDR programme at national, regional and local levels, and in particular to encourage the participation of women in the DDR programme\u2019 \n \u2018Organized 10 regional workshops on DDR with x\u2019s military and civilian authorities\u2019", "newParagraph": "sample set ddr output n provided technical support advice programme development support national ddr coordination council nddrcc regional ddr commission field structure collaboration international financial institution international development organization nongovernmental organization donor development implementation national ddr programme armed force group n provided technical support advice programme development support assist government strengthening capacity legal institutional technical physical area weapon collection control management destruction n conducted 10 training course ddr weapon control military civilian authority first 6 month mission mandate n supported ddr institution collect store control destroy applicable necessary weapon part ddr programme n conducted ddr institution partnership international research institution small arm survey economic market survey verification size ddr caseload eligibility criterion support planning comprehensive ddr programme x n developed option eligibility criterion encampment option integration civil administration force reduction process government national unity n disarmed demobilized 15000 allied militia force including provided related service feeding clothing civic education medical profiling counselling education training employment referral transitional safety allowance training material n disarmed demobilized 5000 member special group woman disabled veteran including provided related service feeding clothing civic education medical profiling counselling education training employment referral transitional safety allowance training material n negotiated secured release 14000 unicef estimate child associated armed force group facilitated return family within 12 month mission mandate n developed coordinated implemented reinsertion support community level 34000 armed individual well individual associated armed force group woman child collaboration national ddr institution un fund programme agency communitybased ddr project include transitional support programme labourintensive public work microenterprise support training shortterm education support n developed coordinated implemented communitybased weapon quickimpact project programme 40 community x n developed implemented ddr small arm sensitization community mobilization programme 6 county x inter alia develop consensus support national ddr programme national regional local level particular encourage participation woman ddr programme n organized 10 regional workshop ddr x military civilian authority ", "ProcessedSent": "communitybased ddr project include transitional support programme labourintensive public work microenterprise support training shortterm education support n developed coordinated implemented communitybased weapon quickimpact project programme 40 community x n developed implemented ddr small arm sensitization community mobilization programme 6 county x inter alia develop consensus support national ddr programme national regional local level particular encourage participation woman ddr programme n organized 10 regional workshop ddr x military civilian authority ", "SentID": 3270 @@ -58933,7 +58933,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1087, - "Paragraph": "SAMPLE SET OF EXTERNAL FACTORS \\n \u2018Political commitment on the part of the parties to the peace agreement to implement the programme\u2019 [rather than \u2018Transitional Government of National Unity adopts legislation establishing national and sub-national DDR institutions, and related weapons control laws\u2019 \u2014 which was stated as an indicator of achievement above] \\n \u2018Commitment of non-signatories to the peace process to support the DDR programme\u2019 \\n \u2018Timely and adequate funding support from voluntary sources\u2019", + "Paragraph": "SAMPLE SET OF EXTERNAL FACTORS \n \u2018Political commitment on the part of the parties to the peace agreement to implement the programme\u2019 [rather than \u2018Transitional Government of National Unity adopts legislation establishing national and sub-national DDR institutions, and related weapons control laws\u2019 \u2014 which was stated as an indicator of achievement above] \n \u2018Commitment of non-signatories to the peace process to support the DDR programme\u2019 \n \u2018Timely and adequate funding support from voluntary sources\u2019", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -58944,14 +58944,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "SAMPLE SET OF EXTERNAL FACTORS \\n \u2018Political commitment on the part of the parties to the peace agreement to implement the programme\u2019 [rather than \u2018Transitional Government of National Unity adopts legislation establishing national and sub-national DDR institutions, and related weapons control laws\u2019 \u2014 which was stated as an indicator of achievement above] \\n \u2018Commitment of non-signatories to the peace process to support the DDR programme\u2019 \\n \u2018Timely and adequate funding support from voluntary sources\u2019", + "Sentence": "SAMPLE SET OF EXTERNAL FACTORS \n \u2018Political commitment on the part of the parties to the peace agreement to implement the programme\u2019 [rather than \u2018Transitional Government of National Unity adopts legislation establishing national and sub-national DDR institutions, and related weapons control laws\u2019 \u2014 which was stated as an indicator of achievement above] \n \u2018Commitment of non-signatories to the peace process to support the DDR programme\u2019 \n \u2018Timely and adequate funding support from voluntary sources\u2019", "newParagraph": "sample set external factor n political commitment part party peace agreement implement programme rather transitional government national unity adopts legislation establishing national subnational ddr institution related weapon control law stated indicator achievement n commitment nonsignatories peace process support ddr programme n timely adequate funding support voluntary source ", "ProcessedSent": "sample set external factor n political commitment part party peace agreement implement programme rather transitional government national unity adopts legislation establishing national subnational ddr institution related weapon control law stated indicator achievement n commitment nonsignatories peace process support ddr programme n timely adequate funding support voluntary source ", "SentID": 3274 }, { "ParagraphID": 1088, - "Paragraph": "1 For more information, see http:\/\/www.undp.org\/bcpr\/. \\n 2 For more information, see http:\/\/europa.eu.int\/comm\/external_relations\/cpcm\/rrm\/index.html. \\n 3 For more information, see http:\/\/lnweb18.worldbank.org\/ESSD\/sdvext.nsf\/67ByDocName\/The PostConflictFund. \\n 4 A\/C.5\/59\/31.", + "Paragraph": "1 For more information, see http:\/\/www.undp.org\/bcpr\/. \n 2 For more information, see http:\/\/europa.eu.int\/comm\/external_relations\/cpcm\/rrm\/index.html. \n 3 For more information, see http:\/\/lnweb18.worldbank.org\/ESSD\/sdvext.nsf\/67ByDocName\/The PostConflictFund. \n 4 A\/C.5\/59\/31.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -58969,7 +58969,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1088, - "Paragraph": "1 For more information, see http:\/\/www.undp.org\/bcpr\/. \\n 2 For more information, see http:\/\/europa.eu.int\/comm\/external_relations\/cpcm\/rrm\/index.html. \\n 3 For more information, see http:\/\/lnweb18.worldbank.org\/ESSD\/sdvext.nsf\/67ByDocName\/The PostConflictFund. \\n 4 A\/C.5\/59\/31.", + "Paragraph": "1 For more information, see http:\/\/www.undp.org\/bcpr\/. \n 2 For more information, see http:\/\/europa.eu.int\/comm\/external_relations\/cpcm\/rrm\/index.html. \n 3 For more information, see http:\/\/lnweb18.worldbank.org\/ESSD\/sdvext.nsf\/67ByDocName\/The PostConflictFund. \n 4 A\/C.5\/59\/31.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -58980,14 +58980,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 2 For more information, see http:\/\/europa.eu.int\/comm\/external_relations\/cpcm\/rrm\/index.html.", + "Sentence": "\n 2 For more information, see http:\/\/europa.eu.int\/comm\/external_relations\/cpcm\/rrm\/index.html.", "newParagraph": "1 information see httpwwwundporgbcpr n 2 information see httpeuropaeuintcommexternalrelationscpcmrrmindexhtml n 3 information see httplnweb18worldbankorgessdsdvextnsf67bydocnamethe postconflictfund n 4 ac55931", "ProcessedSent": "n 2 information see httpeuropaeuintcommexternalrelationscpcmrrmindexhtml", "SentID": 3276 }, { "ParagraphID": 1088, - "Paragraph": "1 For more information, see http:\/\/www.undp.org\/bcpr\/. \\n 2 For more information, see http:\/\/europa.eu.int\/comm\/external_relations\/cpcm\/rrm\/index.html. \\n 3 For more information, see http:\/\/lnweb18.worldbank.org\/ESSD\/sdvext.nsf\/67ByDocName\/The PostConflictFund. \\n 4 A\/C.5\/59\/31.", + "Paragraph": "1 For more information, see http:\/\/www.undp.org\/bcpr\/. \n 2 For more information, see http:\/\/europa.eu.int\/comm\/external_relations\/cpcm\/rrm\/index.html. \n 3 For more information, see http:\/\/lnweb18.worldbank.org\/ESSD\/sdvext.nsf\/67ByDocName\/The PostConflictFund. \n 4 A\/C.5\/59\/31.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -58998,14 +58998,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 3 For more information, see http:\/\/lnweb18.worldbank.org\/ESSD\/sdvext.nsf\/67ByDocName\/The PostConflictFund.", + "Sentence": "\n 3 For more information, see http:\/\/lnweb18.worldbank.org\/ESSD\/sdvext.nsf\/67ByDocName\/The PostConflictFund.", "newParagraph": "1 information see httpwwwundporgbcpr n 2 information see httpeuropaeuintcommexternalrelationscpcmrrmindexhtml n 3 information see httplnweb18worldbankorgessdsdvextnsf67bydocnamethe postconflictfund n 4 ac55931", "ProcessedSent": "n 3 information see httplnweb18worldbankorgessdsdvextnsf67bydocnamethe postconflictfund", "SentID": 3277 }, { "ParagraphID": 1088, - "Paragraph": "1 For more information, see http:\/\/www.undp.org\/bcpr\/. \\n 2 For more information, see http:\/\/europa.eu.int\/comm\/external_relations\/cpcm\/rrm\/index.html. \\n 3 For more information, see http:\/\/lnweb18.worldbank.org\/ESSD\/sdvext.nsf\/67ByDocName\/The PostConflictFund. \\n 4 A\/C.5\/59\/31.", + "Paragraph": "1 For more information, see http:\/\/www.undp.org\/bcpr\/. \n 2 For more information, see http:\/\/europa.eu.int\/comm\/external_relations\/cpcm\/rrm\/index.html. \n 3 For more information, see http:\/\/lnweb18.worldbank.org\/ESSD\/sdvext.nsf\/67ByDocName\/The PostConflictFund. \n 4 A\/C.5\/59\/31.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59016,7 +59016,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 4 A\/C.5\/59\/31.", + "Sentence": "\n 4 A\/C.5\/59\/31.", "newParagraph": "1 information see httpwwwundporgbcpr n 2 information see httpeuropaeuintcommexternalrelationscpcmrrmindexhtml n 3 information see httplnweb18worldbankorgessdsdvextnsf67bydocnamethe postconflictfund n 4 ac55931", "ProcessedSent": "n 4 ac55931", "SentID": 3278 @@ -59113,7 +59113,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1091, - "Paragraph": "The aim of this module is to explain: \\n the role of an integrated DDR unit in a peacekeeping mission; \\n personnel requirements of the DDR unit; \\n the recruitment and deployment process; \\n training opportunities for DDR practitioners.", + "Paragraph": "The aim of this module is to explain: \n the role of an integrated DDR unit in a peacekeeping mission; \n personnel requirements of the DDR unit; \n the recruitment and deployment process; \n training opportunities for DDR practitioners.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59124,7 +59124,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The aim of this module is to explain: \\n the role of an integrated DDR unit in a peacekeeping mission; \\n personnel requirements of the DDR unit; \\n the recruitment and deployment process; \\n training opportunities for DDR practitioners.", + "Sentence": "The aim of this module is to explain: \n the role of an integrated DDR unit in a peacekeeping mission; \n personnel requirements of the DDR unit; \n the recruitment and deployment process; \n training opportunities for DDR practitioners.", "newParagraph": "aim module explain n role integrated ddr unit peacekeeping mission n personnel requirement ddr unit n recruitment deployment process n training opportunity ddr practitioner", "ProcessedSent": "aim module explain n role integrated ddr unit peacekeeping mission n personnel requirement ddr unit n recruitment deployment process n training opportunity ddr practitioner", "SentID": 3284 @@ -59167,7 +59167,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1093, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59185,7 +59185,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1093, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59196,14 +59196,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard.", + "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard.", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "ProcessedSent": "use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard", "SentID": 3288 }, { "ParagraphID": 1093, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59214,14 +59214,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications.", + "Sentence": "\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications.", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "ProcessedSent": "n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification", "SentID": 3289 }, { "ParagraphID": 1093, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59232,7 +59232,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Sentence": "\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "ProcessedSent": "n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "SentID": 3290 @@ -59275,7 +59275,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1096, - "Paragraph": "The design of the personnel structure, and the deployment and management of personnel in the integrated unit and how they relate to others working in DDR are guided by the principles, key considerations and approaches defined in IDDRS 2.10 on the UN Approach to DDR. Of particular importance are: \\n Unity of effort: The peacekeeping mission, UN agencies, funds and programmes should work together at all stages of the DDR programme \u2014 from planning to implementa\u00ad tion to evaluation \u2014 to ensure that the programme is successful. An appropriate joint planning and coordination mechanism must be established as early as possible to ensure cooperation among all UN partners that may be involved in any aspect of the DDR programme; \\n Integration: Wherever possible, and when consistent with the mandate of the Security Council, the peacekeeping mission and the UN agencies, funds and programmes shall support an integrated DDR unit, which brings together the expertise, planning and coordination capacities of the various UN entities.", + "Paragraph": "The design of the personnel structure, and the deployment and management of personnel in the integrated unit and how they relate to others working in DDR are guided by the principles, key considerations and approaches defined in IDDRS 2.10 on the UN Approach to DDR. Of particular importance are: \n Unity of effort: The peacekeeping mission, UN agencies, funds and programmes should work together at all stages of the DDR programme \u2014 from planning to implementa\u00ad tion to evaluation \u2014 to ensure that the programme is successful. An appropriate joint planning and coordination mechanism must be established as early as possible to ensure cooperation among all UN partners that may be involved in any aspect of the DDR programme; \n Integration: Wherever possible, and when consistent with the mandate of the Security Council, the peacekeeping mission and the UN agencies, funds and programmes shall support an integrated DDR unit, which brings together the expertise, planning and coordination capacities of the various UN entities.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59293,7 +59293,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1096, - "Paragraph": "The design of the personnel structure, and the deployment and management of personnel in the integrated unit and how they relate to others working in DDR are guided by the principles, key considerations and approaches defined in IDDRS 2.10 on the UN Approach to DDR. Of particular importance are: \\n Unity of effort: The peacekeeping mission, UN agencies, funds and programmes should work together at all stages of the DDR programme \u2014 from planning to implementa\u00ad tion to evaluation \u2014 to ensure that the programme is successful. An appropriate joint planning and coordination mechanism must be established as early as possible to ensure cooperation among all UN partners that may be involved in any aspect of the DDR programme; \\n Integration: Wherever possible, and when consistent with the mandate of the Security Council, the peacekeeping mission and the UN agencies, funds and programmes shall support an integrated DDR unit, which brings together the expertise, planning and coordination capacities of the various UN entities.", + "Paragraph": "The design of the personnel structure, and the deployment and management of personnel in the integrated unit and how they relate to others working in DDR are guided by the principles, key considerations and approaches defined in IDDRS 2.10 on the UN Approach to DDR. Of particular importance are: \n Unity of effort: The peacekeeping mission, UN agencies, funds and programmes should work together at all stages of the DDR programme \u2014 from planning to implementa\u00ad tion to evaluation \u2014 to ensure that the programme is successful. An appropriate joint planning and coordination mechanism must be established as early as possible to ensure cooperation among all UN partners that may be involved in any aspect of the DDR programme; \n Integration: Wherever possible, and when consistent with the mandate of the Security Council, the peacekeeping mission and the UN agencies, funds and programmes shall support an integrated DDR unit, which brings together the expertise, planning and coordination capacities of the various UN entities.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59304,14 +59304,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Of particular importance are: \\n Unity of effort: The peacekeeping mission, UN agencies, funds and programmes should work together at all stages of the DDR programme \u2014 from planning to implementa\u00ad tion to evaluation \u2014 to ensure that the programme is successful.", + "Sentence": "Of particular importance are: \n Unity of effort: The peacekeeping mission, UN agencies, funds and programmes should work together at all stages of the DDR programme \u2014 from planning to implementa\u00ad tion to evaluation \u2014 to ensure that the programme is successful.", "newParagraph": "design personnel structure deployment management personnel integrated unit relate others working ddr guided principle key consideration approach defined iddrs 210 un approach ddr particular importance n unity effort peacekeeping mission un agency fund programme work together stage ddr programme planning implementa tion evaluation ensure programme successful appropriate joint planning coordination mechanism must established early possible ensure cooperation among un partner may involved aspect ddr programme n integration wherever possible consistent mandate security council peacekeeping mission un agency fund programme shall support integrated ddr unit brings together expertise planning coordination capacity various un entity", "ProcessedSent": "particular importance n unity effort peacekeeping mission un agency fund programme work together stage ddr programme planning implementa tion evaluation ensure programme successful", "SentID": 3294 }, { "ParagraphID": 1096, - "Paragraph": "The design of the personnel structure, and the deployment and management of personnel in the integrated unit and how they relate to others working in DDR are guided by the principles, key considerations and approaches defined in IDDRS 2.10 on the UN Approach to DDR. Of particular importance are: \\n Unity of effort: The peacekeeping mission, UN agencies, funds and programmes should work together at all stages of the DDR programme \u2014 from planning to implementa\u00ad tion to evaluation \u2014 to ensure that the programme is successful. An appropriate joint planning and coordination mechanism must be established as early as possible to ensure cooperation among all UN partners that may be involved in any aspect of the DDR programme; \\n Integration: Wherever possible, and when consistent with the mandate of the Security Council, the peacekeeping mission and the UN agencies, funds and programmes shall support an integrated DDR unit, which brings together the expertise, planning and coordination capacities of the various UN entities.", + "Paragraph": "The design of the personnel structure, and the deployment and management of personnel in the integrated unit and how they relate to others working in DDR are guided by the principles, key considerations and approaches defined in IDDRS 2.10 on the UN Approach to DDR. Of particular importance are: \n Unity of effort: The peacekeeping mission, UN agencies, funds and programmes should work together at all stages of the DDR programme \u2014 from planning to implementa\u00ad tion to evaluation \u2014 to ensure that the programme is successful. An appropriate joint planning and coordination mechanism must be established as early as possible to ensure cooperation among all UN partners that may be involved in any aspect of the DDR programme; \n Integration: Wherever possible, and when consistent with the mandate of the Security Council, the peacekeeping mission and the UN agencies, funds and programmes shall support an integrated DDR unit, which brings together the expertise, planning and coordination capacities of the various UN entities.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59322,7 +59322,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "An appropriate joint planning and coordination mechanism must be established as early as possible to ensure cooperation among all UN partners that may be involved in any aspect of the DDR programme; \\n Integration: Wherever possible, and when consistent with the mandate of the Security Council, the peacekeeping mission and the UN agencies, funds and programmes shall support an integrated DDR unit, which brings together the expertise, planning and coordination capacities of the various UN entities.", + "Sentence": "An appropriate joint planning and coordination mechanism must be established as early as possible to ensure cooperation among all UN partners that may be involved in any aspect of the DDR programme; \n Integration: Wherever possible, and when consistent with the mandate of the Security Council, the peacekeeping mission and the UN agencies, funds and programmes shall support an integrated DDR unit, which brings together the expertise, planning and coordination capacities of the various UN entities.", "newParagraph": "design personnel structure deployment management personnel integrated unit relate others working ddr guided principle key consideration approach defined iddrs 210 un approach ddr particular importance n unity effort peacekeeping mission un agency fund programme work together stage ddr programme planning implementa tion evaluation ensure programme successful appropriate joint planning coordination mechanism must established early possible ensure cooperation among un partner may involved aspect ddr programme n integration wherever possible consistent mandate security council peacekeeping mission un agency fund programme shall support integrated ddr unit brings together expertise planning coordination capacity various un entity", "ProcessedSent": "appropriate joint planning coordination mechanism must established early possible ensure cooperation among un partner may involved aspect ddr programme n integration wherever possible consistent mandate security council peacekeeping mission un agency fund programme shall support integrated ddr unit brings together expertise planning coordination capacity various un entity", "SentID": 3295 @@ -59365,7 +59365,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1098, - "Paragraph": "The integrated DDR unit, in general terms, should fulfil the following functions: \\n Political and programme management: The chief and deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit are responsible for the overall political and programme management. Both the chief and his\/her deputy will work to ensure that the DDR programme supports the overall peace process and mission objectives, and that there is close cooperation and collaboration with national stakeholders and other implementing partners, such as other UN entities, international organizations, non\u00adgovernmental organizations (NGOs) and the donor community; \\n Overall DDR planning and coordination: This component of the DDR unit is responsible for the overall development of the DDR programme. Seconded personnel from UN agencies, funds and programmes will work in this section to contribute to the joint planning and coordination of the DDR programme. Attached military and police per\u00ad sonnel from within the mission will also form part of this component; \\n Disarmament and demobilization: This component will be responsible for the overall implementation and management of all aspects of the disarmament and demobilization phases of the DDR programme. This includes short\u00adterm disarmament activities, such as weapons collection and registration, but also longer\u00adterm disarmament activities that support the establishment of a legal regime for the control of small arms and light weapons, and other community weapons collection initiatives. Where mandated, this component will coordinate with the military to assist in the destruction of weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance; \\n Reintegration: This component plans the economic and social reintegration strategies. It also plans the reinsertion programme to ensure consistency and coherence with the overall reintegration strategy. It needs to work closely with other parts of the mission facilitating the return and reintegration of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees; \\n Monitoring and evaluation: This component is responsible for setting up and monitoring indicators to measure the achievements in all phases of the DDR programme. It also conducts DDR\u00adrelated surveys such as small arms baseline surveys, profiling of parti\u00ad cipants and beneficiaries, mapping of economic opportunities, etc.; \\n Public information and sensitization: This component works to develop the public informa\u00ad tion and sensitization strategy for the DDR programme. It draws on the direct support of the public information unit in the peacekeeping mission, but also employs other information dissemination personnel within the mission, such as the military, police and civil affairs officers, as well as local mechanisms such as theatre groups, adminis\u00ad trative structures, etc.; \\n Administrative and financial management: This is a small component of the unit, which may be seconded from an integrating UN entity to support the programme delivery aspect of the DDR unit. Its role is to utilize the administrative and financial capacities of the UN country office; \\n Regional DDR offices: These are the regional implementing components of the DDR unit, which would implement programmes at the local level in close cooperation with the other regionalized components of civil affairs, military, police, etc.", + "Paragraph": "The integrated DDR unit, in general terms, should fulfil the following functions: \n Political and programme management: The chief and deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit are responsible for the overall political and programme management. Both the chief and his\/her deputy will work to ensure that the DDR programme supports the overall peace process and mission objectives, and that there is close cooperation and collaboration with national stakeholders and other implementing partners, such as other UN entities, international organizations, non\u00adgovernmental organizations (NGOs) and the donor community; \n Overall DDR planning and coordination: This component of the DDR unit is responsible for the overall development of the DDR programme. Seconded personnel from UN agencies, funds and programmes will work in this section to contribute to the joint planning and coordination of the DDR programme. Attached military and police per\u00ad sonnel from within the mission will also form part of this component; \n Disarmament and demobilization: This component will be responsible for the overall implementation and management of all aspects of the disarmament and demobilization phases of the DDR programme. This includes short\u00adterm disarmament activities, such as weapons collection and registration, but also longer\u00adterm disarmament activities that support the establishment of a legal regime for the control of small arms and light weapons, and other community weapons collection initiatives. Where mandated, this component will coordinate with the military to assist in the destruction of weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance; \n Reintegration: This component plans the economic and social reintegration strategies. It also plans the reinsertion programme to ensure consistency and coherence with the overall reintegration strategy. It needs to work closely with other parts of the mission facilitating the return and reintegration of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees; \n Monitoring and evaluation: This component is responsible for setting up and monitoring indicators to measure the achievements in all phases of the DDR programme. It also conducts DDR\u00adrelated surveys such as small arms baseline surveys, profiling of parti\u00ad cipants and beneficiaries, mapping of economic opportunities, etc.; \n Public information and sensitization: This component works to develop the public informa\u00ad tion and sensitization strategy for the DDR programme. It draws on the direct support of the public information unit in the peacekeeping mission, but also employs other information dissemination personnel within the mission, such as the military, police and civil affairs officers, as well as local mechanisms such as theatre groups, adminis\u00ad trative structures, etc.; \n Administrative and financial management: This is a small component of the unit, which may be seconded from an integrating UN entity to support the programme delivery aspect of the DDR unit. Its role is to utilize the administrative and financial capacities of the UN country office; \n Regional DDR offices: These are the regional implementing components of the DDR unit, which would implement programmes at the local level in close cooperation with the other regionalized components of civil affairs, military, police, etc.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59376,14 +59376,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1. Components of the integrated DDR unit", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The integrated DDR unit, in general terms, should fulfil the following functions: \\n Political and programme management: The chief and deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit are responsible for the overall political and programme management.", + "Sentence": "The integrated DDR unit, in general terms, should fulfil the following functions: \n Political and programme management: The chief and deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit are responsible for the overall political and programme management.", "newParagraph": "integrated ddr unit general term fulfil following function n political programme management chief deputy chief integrated ddr unit responsible overall political programme management chief hisher deputy work ensure ddr programme support overall peace process mission objective close cooperation collaboration national stakeholder implementing partner un entity international organization non governmental organization ngo donor community n overall ddr planning coordination component ddr unit responsible overall development ddr programme seconded personnel un agency fund programme work section contribute joint planning coordination ddr programme attached military police per sonnel within mission also form part component n disarmament demobilization component responsible overall implementation management aspect disarmament demobilization phase ddr programme includes short term disarmament activity weapon collection registration also longer term disarmament activity support establishment legal regime control small arm light weapon community weapon collection initiative mandated component coordinate military assist destruction weapon ammunition unexploded ordnance n reintegration component plan economic social reintegration strategy also plan reinsertion programme ensure consistency coherence overall reintegration strategy need work closely part mission facilitating return reintegration internally displaced person idp refugee n monitoring evaluation component responsible setting monitoring indicator measure achievement phase ddr programme also conduct ddr related survey small arm baseline survey profiling parti cipants beneficiary mapping economic opportunity etc n public information sensitization component work develop public informa tion sensitization strategy ddr programme draw direct support public information unit peacekeeping mission also employ information dissemination personnel within mission military police civil affair officer well local mechanism theatre group adminis trative structure etc n administrative financial management small component unit may seconded integrating un entity support programme delivery aspect ddr unit role utilize administrative financial capacity un country office n regional ddr office regional implementing component ddr unit would implement programme local level close cooperation regionalized component civil affair military police etc", "ProcessedSent": "integrated ddr unit general term fulfil following function n political programme management chief deputy chief integrated ddr unit responsible overall political programme management", "SentID": 3298 }, { "ParagraphID": 1098, - "Paragraph": "The integrated DDR unit, in general terms, should fulfil the following functions: \\n Political and programme management: The chief and deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit are responsible for the overall political and programme management. Both the chief and his\/her deputy will work to ensure that the DDR programme supports the overall peace process and mission objectives, and that there is close cooperation and collaboration with national stakeholders and other implementing partners, such as other UN entities, international organizations, non\u00adgovernmental organizations (NGOs) and the donor community; \\n Overall DDR planning and coordination: This component of the DDR unit is responsible for the overall development of the DDR programme. Seconded personnel from UN agencies, funds and programmes will work in this section to contribute to the joint planning and coordination of the DDR programme. Attached military and police per\u00ad sonnel from within the mission will also form part of this component; \\n Disarmament and demobilization: This component will be responsible for the overall implementation and management of all aspects of the disarmament and demobilization phases of the DDR programme. This includes short\u00adterm disarmament activities, such as weapons collection and registration, but also longer\u00adterm disarmament activities that support the establishment of a legal regime for the control of small arms and light weapons, and other community weapons collection initiatives. Where mandated, this component will coordinate with the military to assist in the destruction of weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance; \\n Reintegration: This component plans the economic and social reintegration strategies. It also plans the reinsertion programme to ensure consistency and coherence with the overall reintegration strategy. It needs to work closely with other parts of the mission facilitating the return and reintegration of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees; \\n Monitoring and evaluation: This component is responsible for setting up and monitoring indicators to measure the achievements in all phases of the DDR programme. It also conducts DDR\u00adrelated surveys such as small arms baseline surveys, profiling of parti\u00ad cipants and beneficiaries, mapping of economic opportunities, etc.; \\n Public information and sensitization: This component works to develop the public informa\u00ad tion and sensitization strategy for the DDR programme. It draws on the direct support of the public information unit in the peacekeeping mission, but also employs other information dissemination personnel within the mission, such as the military, police and civil affairs officers, as well as local mechanisms such as theatre groups, adminis\u00ad trative structures, etc.; \\n Administrative and financial management: This is a small component of the unit, which may be seconded from an integrating UN entity to support the programme delivery aspect of the DDR unit. Its role is to utilize the administrative and financial capacities of the UN country office; \\n Regional DDR offices: These are the regional implementing components of the DDR unit, which would implement programmes at the local level in close cooperation with the other regionalized components of civil affairs, military, police, etc.", + "Paragraph": "The integrated DDR unit, in general terms, should fulfil the following functions: \n Political and programme management: The chief and deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit are responsible for the overall political and programme management. Both the chief and his\/her deputy will work to ensure that the DDR programme supports the overall peace process and mission objectives, and that there is close cooperation and collaboration with national stakeholders and other implementing partners, such as other UN entities, international organizations, non\u00adgovernmental organizations (NGOs) and the donor community; \n Overall DDR planning and coordination: This component of the DDR unit is responsible for the overall development of the DDR programme. Seconded personnel from UN agencies, funds and programmes will work in this section to contribute to the joint planning and coordination of the DDR programme. Attached military and police per\u00ad sonnel from within the mission will also form part of this component; \n Disarmament and demobilization: This component will be responsible for the overall implementation and management of all aspects of the disarmament and demobilization phases of the DDR programme. This includes short\u00adterm disarmament activities, such as weapons collection and registration, but also longer\u00adterm disarmament activities that support the establishment of a legal regime for the control of small arms and light weapons, and other community weapons collection initiatives. Where mandated, this component will coordinate with the military to assist in the destruction of weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance; \n Reintegration: This component plans the economic and social reintegration strategies. It also plans the reinsertion programme to ensure consistency and coherence with the overall reintegration strategy. It needs to work closely with other parts of the mission facilitating the return and reintegration of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees; \n Monitoring and evaluation: This component is responsible for setting up and monitoring indicators to measure the achievements in all phases of the DDR programme. It also conducts DDR\u00adrelated surveys such as small arms baseline surveys, profiling of parti\u00ad cipants and beneficiaries, mapping of economic opportunities, etc.; \n Public information and sensitization: This component works to develop the public informa\u00ad tion and sensitization strategy for the DDR programme. It draws on the direct support of the public information unit in the peacekeeping mission, but also employs other information dissemination personnel within the mission, such as the military, police and civil affairs officers, as well as local mechanisms such as theatre groups, adminis\u00ad trative structures, etc.; \n Administrative and financial management: This is a small component of the unit, which may be seconded from an integrating UN entity to support the programme delivery aspect of the DDR unit. Its role is to utilize the administrative and financial capacities of the UN country office; \n Regional DDR offices: These are the regional implementing components of the DDR unit, which would implement programmes at the local level in close cooperation with the other regionalized components of civil affairs, military, police, etc.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59394,14 +59394,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1. Components of the integrated DDR unit", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Both the chief and his\/her deputy will work to ensure that the DDR programme supports the overall peace process and mission objectives, and that there is close cooperation and collaboration with national stakeholders and other implementing partners, such as other UN entities, international organizations, non\u00adgovernmental organizations (NGOs) and the donor community; \\n Overall DDR planning and coordination: This component of the DDR unit is responsible for the overall development of the DDR programme.", + "Sentence": "Both the chief and his\/her deputy will work to ensure that the DDR programme supports the overall peace process and mission objectives, and that there is close cooperation and collaboration with national stakeholders and other implementing partners, such as other UN entities, international organizations, non\u00adgovernmental organizations (NGOs) and the donor community; \n Overall DDR planning and coordination: This component of the DDR unit is responsible for the overall development of the DDR programme.", "newParagraph": "integrated ddr unit general term fulfil following function n political programme management chief deputy chief integrated ddr unit responsible overall political programme management chief hisher deputy work ensure ddr programme support overall peace process mission objective close cooperation collaboration national stakeholder implementing partner un entity international organization non governmental organization ngo donor community n overall ddr planning coordination component ddr unit responsible overall development ddr programme seconded personnel un agency fund programme work section contribute joint planning coordination ddr programme attached military police per sonnel within mission also form part component n disarmament demobilization component responsible overall implementation management aspect disarmament demobilization phase ddr programme includes short term disarmament activity weapon collection registration also longer term disarmament activity support establishment legal regime control small arm light weapon community weapon collection initiative mandated component coordinate military assist destruction weapon ammunition unexploded ordnance n reintegration component plan economic social reintegration strategy also plan reinsertion programme ensure consistency coherence overall reintegration strategy need work closely part mission facilitating return reintegration internally displaced person idp refugee n monitoring evaluation component responsible setting monitoring indicator measure achievement phase ddr programme also conduct ddr related survey small arm baseline survey profiling parti cipants beneficiary mapping economic opportunity etc n public information sensitization component work develop public informa tion sensitization strategy ddr programme draw direct support public information unit peacekeeping mission also employ information dissemination personnel within mission military police civil affair officer well local mechanism theatre group adminis trative structure etc n administrative financial management small component unit may seconded integrating un entity support programme delivery aspect ddr unit role utilize administrative financial capacity un country office n regional ddr office regional implementing component ddr unit would implement programme local level close cooperation regionalized component civil affair military police etc", "ProcessedSent": "chief hisher deputy work ensure ddr programme support overall peace process mission objective close cooperation collaboration national stakeholder implementing partner un entity international organization non governmental organization ngo donor community n overall ddr planning coordination component ddr unit responsible overall development ddr programme", "SentID": 3299 }, { "ParagraphID": 1098, - "Paragraph": "The integrated DDR unit, in general terms, should fulfil the following functions: \\n Political and programme management: The chief and deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit are responsible for the overall political and programme management. Both the chief and his\/her deputy will work to ensure that the DDR programme supports the overall peace process and mission objectives, and that there is close cooperation and collaboration with national stakeholders and other implementing partners, such as other UN entities, international organizations, non\u00adgovernmental organizations (NGOs) and the donor community; \\n Overall DDR planning and coordination: This component of the DDR unit is responsible for the overall development of the DDR programme. Seconded personnel from UN agencies, funds and programmes will work in this section to contribute to the joint planning and coordination of the DDR programme. Attached military and police per\u00ad sonnel from within the mission will also form part of this component; \\n Disarmament and demobilization: This component will be responsible for the overall implementation and management of all aspects of the disarmament and demobilization phases of the DDR programme. This includes short\u00adterm disarmament activities, such as weapons collection and registration, but also longer\u00adterm disarmament activities that support the establishment of a legal regime for the control of small arms and light weapons, and other community weapons collection initiatives. Where mandated, this component will coordinate with the military to assist in the destruction of weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance; \\n Reintegration: This component plans the economic and social reintegration strategies. It also plans the reinsertion programme to ensure consistency and coherence with the overall reintegration strategy. It needs to work closely with other parts of the mission facilitating the return and reintegration of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees; \\n Monitoring and evaluation: This component is responsible for setting up and monitoring indicators to measure the achievements in all phases of the DDR programme. It also conducts DDR\u00adrelated surveys such as small arms baseline surveys, profiling of parti\u00ad cipants and beneficiaries, mapping of economic opportunities, etc.; \\n Public information and sensitization: This component works to develop the public informa\u00ad tion and sensitization strategy for the DDR programme. It draws on the direct support of the public information unit in the peacekeeping mission, but also employs other information dissemination personnel within the mission, such as the military, police and civil affairs officers, as well as local mechanisms such as theatre groups, adminis\u00ad trative structures, etc.; \\n Administrative and financial management: This is a small component of the unit, which may be seconded from an integrating UN entity to support the programme delivery aspect of the DDR unit. Its role is to utilize the administrative and financial capacities of the UN country office; \\n Regional DDR offices: These are the regional implementing components of the DDR unit, which would implement programmes at the local level in close cooperation with the other regionalized components of civil affairs, military, police, etc.", + "Paragraph": "The integrated DDR unit, in general terms, should fulfil the following functions: \n Political and programme management: The chief and deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit are responsible for the overall political and programme management. Both the chief and his\/her deputy will work to ensure that the DDR programme supports the overall peace process and mission objectives, and that there is close cooperation and collaboration with national stakeholders and other implementing partners, such as other UN entities, international organizations, non\u00adgovernmental organizations (NGOs) and the donor community; \n Overall DDR planning and coordination: This component of the DDR unit is responsible for the overall development of the DDR programme. Seconded personnel from UN agencies, funds and programmes will work in this section to contribute to the joint planning and coordination of the DDR programme. Attached military and police per\u00ad sonnel from within the mission will also form part of this component; \n Disarmament and demobilization: This component will be responsible for the overall implementation and management of all aspects of the disarmament and demobilization phases of the DDR programme. This includes short\u00adterm disarmament activities, such as weapons collection and registration, but also longer\u00adterm disarmament activities that support the establishment of a legal regime for the control of small arms and light weapons, and other community weapons collection initiatives. Where mandated, this component will coordinate with the military to assist in the destruction of weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance; \n Reintegration: This component plans the economic and social reintegration strategies. It also plans the reinsertion programme to ensure consistency and coherence with the overall reintegration strategy. It needs to work closely with other parts of the mission facilitating the return and reintegration of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees; \n Monitoring and evaluation: This component is responsible for setting up and monitoring indicators to measure the achievements in all phases of the DDR programme. It also conducts DDR\u00adrelated surveys such as small arms baseline surveys, profiling of parti\u00ad cipants and beneficiaries, mapping of economic opportunities, etc.; \n Public information and sensitization: This component works to develop the public informa\u00ad tion and sensitization strategy for the DDR programme. It draws on the direct support of the public information unit in the peacekeeping mission, but also employs other information dissemination personnel within the mission, such as the military, police and civil affairs officers, as well as local mechanisms such as theatre groups, adminis\u00ad trative structures, etc.; \n Administrative and financial management: This is a small component of the unit, which may be seconded from an integrating UN entity to support the programme delivery aspect of the DDR unit. Its role is to utilize the administrative and financial capacities of the UN country office; \n Regional DDR offices: These are the regional implementing components of the DDR unit, which would implement programmes at the local level in close cooperation with the other regionalized components of civil affairs, military, police, etc.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59419,7 +59419,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1098, - "Paragraph": "The integrated DDR unit, in general terms, should fulfil the following functions: \\n Political and programme management: The chief and deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit are responsible for the overall political and programme management. Both the chief and his\/her deputy will work to ensure that the DDR programme supports the overall peace process and mission objectives, and that there is close cooperation and collaboration with national stakeholders and other implementing partners, such as other UN entities, international organizations, non\u00adgovernmental organizations (NGOs) and the donor community; \\n Overall DDR planning and coordination: This component of the DDR unit is responsible for the overall development of the DDR programme. Seconded personnel from UN agencies, funds and programmes will work in this section to contribute to the joint planning and coordination of the DDR programme. Attached military and police per\u00ad sonnel from within the mission will also form part of this component; \\n Disarmament and demobilization: This component will be responsible for the overall implementation and management of all aspects of the disarmament and demobilization phases of the DDR programme. This includes short\u00adterm disarmament activities, such as weapons collection and registration, but also longer\u00adterm disarmament activities that support the establishment of a legal regime for the control of small arms and light weapons, and other community weapons collection initiatives. Where mandated, this component will coordinate with the military to assist in the destruction of weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance; \\n Reintegration: This component plans the economic and social reintegration strategies. It also plans the reinsertion programme to ensure consistency and coherence with the overall reintegration strategy. It needs to work closely with other parts of the mission facilitating the return and reintegration of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees; \\n Monitoring and evaluation: This component is responsible for setting up and monitoring indicators to measure the achievements in all phases of the DDR programme. It also conducts DDR\u00adrelated surveys such as small arms baseline surveys, profiling of parti\u00ad cipants and beneficiaries, mapping of economic opportunities, etc.; \\n Public information and sensitization: This component works to develop the public informa\u00ad tion and sensitization strategy for the DDR programme. It draws on the direct support of the public information unit in the peacekeeping mission, but also employs other information dissemination personnel within the mission, such as the military, police and civil affairs officers, as well as local mechanisms such as theatre groups, adminis\u00ad trative structures, etc.; \\n Administrative and financial management: This is a small component of the unit, which may be seconded from an integrating UN entity to support the programme delivery aspect of the DDR unit. Its role is to utilize the administrative and financial capacities of the UN country office; \\n Regional DDR offices: These are the regional implementing components of the DDR unit, which would implement programmes at the local level in close cooperation with the other regionalized components of civil affairs, military, police, etc.", + "Paragraph": "The integrated DDR unit, in general terms, should fulfil the following functions: \n Political and programme management: The chief and deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit are responsible for the overall political and programme management. Both the chief and his\/her deputy will work to ensure that the DDR programme supports the overall peace process and mission objectives, and that there is close cooperation and collaboration with national stakeholders and other implementing partners, such as other UN entities, international organizations, non\u00adgovernmental organizations (NGOs) and the donor community; \n Overall DDR planning and coordination: This component of the DDR unit is responsible for the overall development of the DDR programme. Seconded personnel from UN agencies, funds and programmes will work in this section to contribute to the joint planning and coordination of the DDR programme. Attached military and police per\u00ad sonnel from within the mission will also form part of this component; \n Disarmament and demobilization: This component will be responsible for the overall implementation and management of all aspects of the disarmament and demobilization phases of the DDR programme. This includes short\u00adterm disarmament activities, such as weapons collection and registration, but also longer\u00adterm disarmament activities that support the establishment of a legal regime for the control of small arms and light weapons, and other community weapons collection initiatives. Where mandated, this component will coordinate with the military to assist in the destruction of weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance; \n Reintegration: This component plans the economic and social reintegration strategies. It also plans the reinsertion programme to ensure consistency and coherence with the overall reintegration strategy. It needs to work closely with other parts of the mission facilitating the return and reintegration of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees; \n Monitoring and evaluation: This component is responsible for setting up and monitoring indicators to measure the achievements in all phases of the DDR programme. It also conducts DDR\u00adrelated surveys such as small arms baseline surveys, profiling of parti\u00ad cipants and beneficiaries, mapping of economic opportunities, etc.; \n Public information and sensitization: This component works to develop the public informa\u00ad tion and sensitization strategy for the DDR programme. It draws on the direct support of the public information unit in the peacekeeping mission, but also employs other information dissemination personnel within the mission, such as the military, police and civil affairs officers, as well as local mechanisms such as theatre groups, adminis\u00ad trative structures, etc.; \n Administrative and financial management: This is a small component of the unit, which may be seconded from an integrating UN entity to support the programme delivery aspect of the DDR unit. Its role is to utilize the administrative and financial capacities of the UN country office; \n Regional DDR offices: These are the regional implementing components of the DDR unit, which would implement programmes at the local level in close cooperation with the other regionalized components of civil affairs, military, police, etc.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59430,14 +59430,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1. Components of the integrated DDR unit", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Attached military and police per\u00ad sonnel from within the mission will also form part of this component; \\n Disarmament and demobilization: This component will be responsible for the overall implementation and management of all aspects of the disarmament and demobilization phases of the DDR programme.", + "Sentence": "Attached military and police per\u00ad sonnel from within the mission will also form part of this component; \n Disarmament and demobilization: This component will be responsible for the overall implementation and management of all aspects of the disarmament and demobilization phases of the DDR programme.", "newParagraph": "integrated ddr unit general term fulfil following function n political programme management chief deputy chief integrated ddr unit responsible overall political programme management chief hisher deputy work ensure ddr programme support overall peace process mission objective close cooperation collaboration national stakeholder implementing partner un entity international organization non governmental organization ngo donor community n overall ddr planning coordination component ddr unit responsible overall development ddr programme seconded personnel un agency fund programme work section contribute joint planning coordination ddr programme attached military police per sonnel within mission also form part component n disarmament demobilization component responsible overall implementation management aspect disarmament demobilization phase ddr programme includes short term disarmament activity weapon collection registration also longer term disarmament activity support establishment legal regime control small arm light weapon community weapon collection initiative mandated component coordinate military assist destruction weapon ammunition unexploded ordnance n reintegration component plan economic social reintegration strategy also plan reinsertion programme ensure consistency coherence overall reintegration strategy need work closely part mission facilitating return reintegration internally displaced person idp refugee n monitoring evaluation component responsible setting monitoring indicator measure achievement phase ddr programme also conduct ddr related survey small arm baseline survey profiling parti cipants beneficiary mapping economic opportunity etc n public information sensitization component work develop public informa tion sensitization strategy ddr programme draw direct support public information unit peacekeeping mission also employ information dissemination personnel within mission military police civil affair officer well local mechanism theatre group adminis trative structure etc n administrative financial management small component unit may seconded integrating un entity support programme delivery aspect ddr unit role utilize administrative financial capacity un country office n regional ddr office regional implementing component ddr unit would implement programme local level close cooperation regionalized component civil affair military police etc", "ProcessedSent": "attached military police per sonnel within mission also form part component n disarmament demobilization component responsible overall implementation management aspect disarmament demobilization phase ddr programme", "SentID": 3301 }, { "ParagraphID": 1098, - "Paragraph": "The integrated DDR unit, in general terms, should fulfil the following functions: \\n Political and programme management: The chief and deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit are responsible for the overall political and programme management. Both the chief and his\/her deputy will work to ensure that the DDR programme supports the overall peace process and mission objectives, and that there is close cooperation and collaboration with national stakeholders and other implementing partners, such as other UN entities, international organizations, non\u00adgovernmental organizations (NGOs) and the donor community; \\n Overall DDR planning and coordination: This component of the DDR unit is responsible for the overall development of the DDR programme. Seconded personnel from UN agencies, funds and programmes will work in this section to contribute to the joint planning and coordination of the DDR programme. Attached military and police per\u00ad sonnel from within the mission will also form part of this component; \\n Disarmament and demobilization: This component will be responsible for the overall implementation and management of all aspects of the disarmament and demobilization phases of the DDR programme. This includes short\u00adterm disarmament activities, such as weapons collection and registration, but also longer\u00adterm disarmament activities that support the establishment of a legal regime for the control of small arms and light weapons, and other community weapons collection initiatives. Where mandated, this component will coordinate with the military to assist in the destruction of weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance; \\n Reintegration: This component plans the economic and social reintegration strategies. It also plans the reinsertion programme to ensure consistency and coherence with the overall reintegration strategy. It needs to work closely with other parts of the mission facilitating the return and reintegration of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees; \\n Monitoring and evaluation: This component is responsible for setting up and monitoring indicators to measure the achievements in all phases of the DDR programme. It also conducts DDR\u00adrelated surveys such as small arms baseline surveys, profiling of parti\u00ad cipants and beneficiaries, mapping of economic opportunities, etc.; \\n Public information and sensitization: This component works to develop the public informa\u00ad tion and sensitization strategy for the DDR programme. It draws on the direct support of the public information unit in the peacekeeping mission, but also employs other information dissemination personnel within the mission, such as the military, police and civil affairs officers, as well as local mechanisms such as theatre groups, adminis\u00ad trative structures, etc.; \\n Administrative and financial management: This is a small component of the unit, which may be seconded from an integrating UN entity to support the programme delivery aspect of the DDR unit. Its role is to utilize the administrative and financial capacities of the UN country office; \\n Regional DDR offices: These are the regional implementing components of the DDR unit, which would implement programmes at the local level in close cooperation with the other regionalized components of civil affairs, military, police, etc.", + "Paragraph": "The integrated DDR unit, in general terms, should fulfil the following functions: \n Political and programme management: The chief and deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit are responsible for the overall political and programme management. Both the chief and his\/her deputy will work to ensure that the DDR programme supports the overall peace process and mission objectives, and that there is close cooperation and collaboration with national stakeholders and other implementing partners, such as other UN entities, international organizations, non\u00adgovernmental organizations (NGOs) and the donor community; \n Overall DDR planning and coordination: This component of the DDR unit is responsible for the overall development of the DDR programme. Seconded personnel from UN agencies, funds and programmes will work in this section to contribute to the joint planning and coordination of the DDR programme. Attached military and police per\u00ad sonnel from within the mission will also form part of this component; \n Disarmament and demobilization: This component will be responsible for the overall implementation and management of all aspects of the disarmament and demobilization phases of the DDR programme. This includes short\u00adterm disarmament activities, such as weapons collection and registration, but also longer\u00adterm disarmament activities that support the establishment of a legal regime for the control of small arms and light weapons, and other community weapons collection initiatives. Where mandated, this component will coordinate with the military to assist in the destruction of weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance; \n Reintegration: This component plans the economic and social reintegration strategies. It also plans the reinsertion programme to ensure consistency and coherence with the overall reintegration strategy. It needs to work closely with other parts of the mission facilitating the return and reintegration of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees; \n Monitoring and evaluation: This component is responsible for setting up and monitoring indicators to measure the achievements in all phases of the DDR programme. It also conducts DDR\u00adrelated surveys such as small arms baseline surveys, profiling of parti\u00ad cipants and beneficiaries, mapping of economic opportunities, etc.; \n Public information and sensitization: This component works to develop the public informa\u00ad tion and sensitization strategy for the DDR programme. It draws on the direct support of the public information unit in the peacekeeping mission, but also employs other information dissemination personnel within the mission, such as the military, police and civil affairs officers, as well as local mechanisms such as theatre groups, adminis\u00ad trative structures, etc.; \n Administrative and financial management: This is a small component of the unit, which may be seconded from an integrating UN entity to support the programme delivery aspect of the DDR unit. Its role is to utilize the administrative and financial capacities of the UN country office; \n Regional DDR offices: These are the regional implementing components of the DDR unit, which would implement programmes at the local level in close cooperation with the other regionalized components of civil affairs, military, police, etc.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59455,7 +59455,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1098, - "Paragraph": "The integrated DDR unit, in general terms, should fulfil the following functions: \\n Political and programme management: The chief and deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit are responsible for the overall political and programme management. Both the chief and his\/her deputy will work to ensure that the DDR programme supports the overall peace process and mission objectives, and that there is close cooperation and collaboration with national stakeholders and other implementing partners, such as other UN entities, international organizations, non\u00adgovernmental organizations (NGOs) and the donor community; \\n Overall DDR planning and coordination: This component of the DDR unit is responsible for the overall development of the DDR programme. Seconded personnel from UN agencies, funds and programmes will work in this section to contribute to the joint planning and coordination of the DDR programme. Attached military and police per\u00ad sonnel from within the mission will also form part of this component; \\n Disarmament and demobilization: This component will be responsible for the overall implementation and management of all aspects of the disarmament and demobilization phases of the DDR programme. This includes short\u00adterm disarmament activities, such as weapons collection and registration, but also longer\u00adterm disarmament activities that support the establishment of a legal regime for the control of small arms and light weapons, and other community weapons collection initiatives. Where mandated, this component will coordinate with the military to assist in the destruction of weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance; \\n Reintegration: This component plans the economic and social reintegration strategies. It also plans the reinsertion programme to ensure consistency and coherence with the overall reintegration strategy. It needs to work closely with other parts of the mission facilitating the return and reintegration of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees; \\n Monitoring and evaluation: This component is responsible for setting up and monitoring indicators to measure the achievements in all phases of the DDR programme. It also conducts DDR\u00adrelated surveys such as small arms baseline surveys, profiling of parti\u00ad cipants and beneficiaries, mapping of economic opportunities, etc.; \\n Public information and sensitization: This component works to develop the public informa\u00ad tion and sensitization strategy for the DDR programme. It draws on the direct support of the public information unit in the peacekeeping mission, but also employs other information dissemination personnel within the mission, such as the military, police and civil affairs officers, as well as local mechanisms such as theatre groups, adminis\u00ad trative structures, etc.; \\n Administrative and financial management: This is a small component of the unit, which may be seconded from an integrating UN entity to support the programme delivery aspect of the DDR unit. Its role is to utilize the administrative and financial capacities of the UN country office; \\n Regional DDR offices: These are the regional implementing components of the DDR unit, which would implement programmes at the local level in close cooperation with the other regionalized components of civil affairs, military, police, etc.", + "Paragraph": "The integrated DDR unit, in general terms, should fulfil the following functions: \n Political and programme management: The chief and deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit are responsible for the overall political and programme management. Both the chief and his\/her deputy will work to ensure that the DDR programme supports the overall peace process and mission objectives, and that there is close cooperation and collaboration with national stakeholders and other implementing partners, such as other UN entities, international organizations, non\u00adgovernmental organizations (NGOs) and the donor community; \n Overall DDR planning and coordination: This component of the DDR unit is responsible for the overall development of the DDR programme. Seconded personnel from UN agencies, funds and programmes will work in this section to contribute to the joint planning and coordination of the DDR programme. Attached military and police per\u00ad sonnel from within the mission will also form part of this component; \n Disarmament and demobilization: This component will be responsible for the overall implementation and management of all aspects of the disarmament and demobilization phases of the DDR programme. This includes short\u00adterm disarmament activities, such as weapons collection and registration, but also longer\u00adterm disarmament activities that support the establishment of a legal regime for the control of small arms and light weapons, and other community weapons collection initiatives. Where mandated, this component will coordinate with the military to assist in the destruction of weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance; \n Reintegration: This component plans the economic and social reintegration strategies. It also plans the reinsertion programme to ensure consistency and coherence with the overall reintegration strategy. It needs to work closely with other parts of the mission facilitating the return and reintegration of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees; \n Monitoring and evaluation: This component is responsible for setting up and monitoring indicators to measure the achievements in all phases of the DDR programme. It also conducts DDR\u00adrelated surveys such as small arms baseline surveys, profiling of parti\u00ad cipants and beneficiaries, mapping of economic opportunities, etc.; \n Public information and sensitization: This component works to develop the public informa\u00ad tion and sensitization strategy for the DDR programme. It draws on the direct support of the public information unit in the peacekeeping mission, but also employs other information dissemination personnel within the mission, such as the military, police and civil affairs officers, as well as local mechanisms such as theatre groups, adminis\u00ad trative structures, etc.; \n Administrative and financial management: This is a small component of the unit, which may be seconded from an integrating UN entity to support the programme delivery aspect of the DDR unit. Its role is to utilize the administrative and financial capacities of the UN country office; \n Regional DDR offices: These are the regional implementing components of the DDR unit, which would implement programmes at the local level in close cooperation with the other regionalized components of civil affairs, military, police, etc.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59466,14 +59466,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1. Components of the integrated DDR unit", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Where mandated, this component will coordinate with the military to assist in the destruction of weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance; \\n Reintegration: This component plans the economic and social reintegration strategies.", + "Sentence": "Where mandated, this component will coordinate with the military to assist in the destruction of weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance; \n Reintegration: This component plans the economic and social reintegration strategies.", "newParagraph": "integrated ddr unit general term fulfil following function n political programme management chief deputy chief integrated ddr unit responsible overall political programme management chief hisher deputy work ensure ddr programme support overall peace process mission objective close cooperation collaboration national stakeholder implementing partner un entity international organization non governmental organization ngo donor community n overall ddr planning coordination component ddr unit responsible overall development ddr programme seconded personnel un agency fund programme work section contribute joint planning coordination ddr programme attached military police per sonnel within mission also form part component n disarmament demobilization component responsible overall implementation management aspect disarmament demobilization phase ddr programme includes short term disarmament activity weapon collection registration also longer term disarmament activity support establishment legal regime control small arm light weapon community weapon collection initiative mandated component coordinate military assist destruction weapon ammunition unexploded ordnance n reintegration component plan economic social reintegration strategy also plan reinsertion programme ensure consistency coherence overall reintegration strategy need work closely part mission facilitating return reintegration internally displaced person idp refugee n monitoring evaluation component responsible setting monitoring indicator measure achievement phase ddr programme also conduct ddr related survey small arm baseline survey profiling parti cipants beneficiary mapping economic opportunity etc n public information sensitization component work develop public informa tion sensitization strategy ddr programme draw direct support public information unit peacekeeping mission also employ information dissemination personnel within mission military police civil affair officer well local mechanism theatre group adminis trative structure etc n administrative financial management small component unit may seconded integrating un entity support programme delivery aspect ddr unit role utilize administrative financial capacity un country office n regional ddr office regional implementing component ddr unit would implement programme local level close cooperation regionalized component civil affair military police etc", "ProcessedSent": "mandated component coordinate military assist destruction weapon ammunition unexploded ordnance n reintegration component plan economic social reintegration strategy", "SentID": 3303 }, { "ParagraphID": 1098, - "Paragraph": "The integrated DDR unit, in general terms, should fulfil the following functions: \\n Political and programme management: The chief and deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit are responsible for the overall political and programme management. Both the chief and his\/her deputy will work to ensure that the DDR programme supports the overall peace process and mission objectives, and that there is close cooperation and collaboration with national stakeholders and other implementing partners, such as other UN entities, international organizations, non\u00adgovernmental organizations (NGOs) and the donor community; \\n Overall DDR planning and coordination: This component of the DDR unit is responsible for the overall development of the DDR programme. Seconded personnel from UN agencies, funds and programmes will work in this section to contribute to the joint planning and coordination of the DDR programme. Attached military and police per\u00ad sonnel from within the mission will also form part of this component; \\n Disarmament and demobilization: This component will be responsible for the overall implementation and management of all aspects of the disarmament and demobilization phases of the DDR programme. This includes short\u00adterm disarmament activities, such as weapons collection and registration, but also longer\u00adterm disarmament activities that support the establishment of a legal regime for the control of small arms and light weapons, and other community weapons collection initiatives. Where mandated, this component will coordinate with the military to assist in the destruction of weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance; \\n Reintegration: This component plans the economic and social reintegration strategies. It also plans the reinsertion programme to ensure consistency and coherence with the overall reintegration strategy. It needs to work closely with other parts of the mission facilitating the return and reintegration of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees; \\n Monitoring and evaluation: This component is responsible for setting up and monitoring indicators to measure the achievements in all phases of the DDR programme. It also conducts DDR\u00adrelated surveys such as small arms baseline surveys, profiling of parti\u00ad cipants and beneficiaries, mapping of economic opportunities, etc.; \\n Public information and sensitization: This component works to develop the public informa\u00ad tion and sensitization strategy for the DDR programme. It draws on the direct support of the public information unit in the peacekeeping mission, but also employs other information dissemination personnel within the mission, such as the military, police and civil affairs officers, as well as local mechanisms such as theatre groups, adminis\u00ad trative structures, etc.; \\n Administrative and financial management: This is a small component of the unit, which may be seconded from an integrating UN entity to support the programme delivery aspect of the DDR unit. Its role is to utilize the administrative and financial capacities of the UN country office; \\n Regional DDR offices: These are the regional implementing components of the DDR unit, which would implement programmes at the local level in close cooperation with the other regionalized components of civil affairs, military, police, etc.", + "Paragraph": "The integrated DDR unit, in general terms, should fulfil the following functions: \n Political and programme management: The chief and deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit are responsible for the overall political and programme management. Both the chief and his\/her deputy will work to ensure that the DDR programme supports the overall peace process and mission objectives, and that there is close cooperation and collaboration with national stakeholders and other implementing partners, such as other UN entities, international organizations, non\u00adgovernmental organizations (NGOs) and the donor community; \n Overall DDR planning and coordination: This component of the DDR unit is responsible for the overall development of the DDR programme. Seconded personnel from UN agencies, funds and programmes will work in this section to contribute to the joint planning and coordination of the DDR programme. Attached military and police per\u00ad sonnel from within the mission will also form part of this component; \n Disarmament and demobilization: This component will be responsible for the overall implementation and management of all aspects of the disarmament and demobilization phases of the DDR programme. This includes short\u00adterm disarmament activities, such as weapons collection and registration, but also longer\u00adterm disarmament activities that support the establishment of a legal regime for the control of small arms and light weapons, and other community weapons collection initiatives. Where mandated, this component will coordinate with the military to assist in the destruction of weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance; \n Reintegration: This component plans the economic and social reintegration strategies. It also plans the reinsertion programme to ensure consistency and coherence with the overall reintegration strategy. It needs to work closely with other parts of the mission facilitating the return and reintegration of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees; \n Monitoring and evaluation: This component is responsible for setting up and monitoring indicators to measure the achievements in all phases of the DDR programme. It also conducts DDR\u00adrelated surveys such as small arms baseline surveys, profiling of parti\u00ad cipants and beneficiaries, mapping of economic opportunities, etc.; \n Public information and sensitization: This component works to develop the public informa\u00ad tion and sensitization strategy for the DDR programme. It draws on the direct support of the public information unit in the peacekeeping mission, but also employs other information dissemination personnel within the mission, such as the military, police and civil affairs officers, as well as local mechanisms such as theatre groups, adminis\u00ad trative structures, etc.; \n Administrative and financial management: This is a small component of the unit, which may be seconded from an integrating UN entity to support the programme delivery aspect of the DDR unit. Its role is to utilize the administrative and financial capacities of the UN country office; \n Regional DDR offices: These are the regional implementing components of the DDR unit, which would implement programmes at the local level in close cooperation with the other regionalized components of civil affairs, military, police, etc.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59491,7 +59491,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1098, - "Paragraph": "The integrated DDR unit, in general terms, should fulfil the following functions: \\n Political and programme management: The chief and deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit are responsible for the overall political and programme management. Both the chief and his\/her deputy will work to ensure that the DDR programme supports the overall peace process and mission objectives, and that there is close cooperation and collaboration with national stakeholders and other implementing partners, such as other UN entities, international organizations, non\u00adgovernmental organizations (NGOs) and the donor community; \\n Overall DDR planning and coordination: This component of the DDR unit is responsible for the overall development of the DDR programme. Seconded personnel from UN agencies, funds and programmes will work in this section to contribute to the joint planning and coordination of the DDR programme. Attached military and police per\u00ad sonnel from within the mission will also form part of this component; \\n Disarmament and demobilization: This component will be responsible for the overall implementation and management of all aspects of the disarmament and demobilization phases of the DDR programme. This includes short\u00adterm disarmament activities, such as weapons collection and registration, but also longer\u00adterm disarmament activities that support the establishment of a legal regime for the control of small arms and light weapons, and other community weapons collection initiatives. Where mandated, this component will coordinate with the military to assist in the destruction of weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance; \\n Reintegration: This component plans the economic and social reintegration strategies. It also plans the reinsertion programme to ensure consistency and coherence with the overall reintegration strategy. It needs to work closely with other parts of the mission facilitating the return and reintegration of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees; \\n Monitoring and evaluation: This component is responsible for setting up and monitoring indicators to measure the achievements in all phases of the DDR programme. It also conducts DDR\u00adrelated surveys such as small arms baseline surveys, profiling of parti\u00ad cipants and beneficiaries, mapping of economic opportunities, etc.; \\n Public information and sensitization: This component works to develop the public informa\u00ad tion and sensitization strategy for the DDR programme. It draws on the direct support of the public information unit in the peacekeeping mission, but also employs other information dissemination personnel within the mission, such as the military, police and civil affairs officers, as well as local mechanisms such as theatre groups, adminis\u00ad trative structures, etc.; \\n Administrative and financial management: This is a small component of the unit, which may be seconded from an integrating UN entity to support the programme delivery aspect of the DDR unit. Its role is to utilize the administrative and financial capacities of the UN country office; \\n Regional DDR offices: These are the regional implementing components of the DDR unit, which would implement programmes at the local level in close cooperation with the other regionalized components of civil affairs, military, police, etc.", + "Paragraph": "The integrated DDR unit, in general terms, should fulfil the following functions: \n Political and programme management: The chief and deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit are responsible for the overall political and programme management. Both the chief and his\/her deputy will work to ensure that the DDR programme supports the overall peace process and mission objectives, and that there is close cooperation and collaboration with national stakeholders and other implementing partners, such as other UN entities, international organizations, non\u00adgovernmental organizations (NGOs) and the donor community; \n Overall DDR planning and coordination: This component of the DDR unit is responsible for the overall development of the DDR programme. Seconded personnel from UN agencies, funds and programmes will work in this section to contribute to the joint planning and coordination of the DDR programme. Attached military and police per\u00ad sonnel from within the mission will also form part of this component; \n Disarmament and demobilization: This component will be responsible for the overall implementation and management of all aspects of the disarmament and demobilization phases of the DDR programme. This includes short\u00adterm disarmament activities, such as weapons collection and registration, but also longer\u00adterm disarmament activities that support the establishment of a legal regime for the control of small arms and light weapons, and other community weapons collection initiatives. Where mandated, this component will coordinate with the military to assist in the destruction of weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance; \n Reintegration: This component plans the economic and social reintegration strategies. It also plans the reinsertion programme to ensure consistency and coherence with the overall reintegration strategy. It needs to work closely with other parts of the mission facilitating the return and reintegration of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees; \n Monitoring and evaluation: This component is responsible for setting up and monitoring indicators to measure the achievements in all phases of the DDR programme. It also conducts DDR\u00adrelated surveys such as small arms baseline surveys, profiling of parti\u00ad cipants and beneficiaries, mapping of economic opportunities, etc.; \n Public information and sensitization: This component works to develop the public informa\u00ad tion and sensitization strategy for the DDR programme. It draws on the direct support of the public information unit in the peacekeeping mission, but also employs other information dissemination personnel within the mission, such as the military, police and civil affairs officers, as well as local mechanisms such as theatre groups, adminis\u00ad trative structures, etc.; \n Administrative and financial management: This is a small component of the unit, which may be seconded from an integrating UN entity to support the programme delivery aspect of the DDR unit. Its role is to utilize the administrative and financial capacities of the UN country office; \n Regional DDR offices: These are the regional implementing components of the DDR unit, which would implement programmes at the local level in close cooperation with the other regionalized components of civil affairs, military, police, etc.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59502,14 +59502,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1. Components of the integrated DDR unit", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "It needs to work closely with other parts of the mission facilitating the return and reintegration of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees; \\n Monitoring and evaluation: This component is responsible for setting up and monitoring indicators to measure the achievements in all phases of the DDR programme.", + "Sentence": "It needs to work closely with other parts of the mission facilitating the return and reintegration of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees; \n Monitoring and evaluation: This component is responsible for setting up and monitoring indicators to measure the achievements in all phases of the DDR programme.", "newParagraph": "integrated ddr unit general term fulfil following function n political programme management chief deputy chief integrated ddr unit responsible overall political programme management chief hisher deputy work ensure ddr programme support overall peace process mission objective close cooperation collaboration national stakeholder implementing partner un entity international organization non governmental organization ngo donor community n overall ddr planning coordination component ddr unit responsible overall development ddr programme seconded personnel un agency fund programme work section contribute joint planning coordination ddr programme attached military police per sonnel within mission also form part component n disarmament demobilization component responsible overall implementation management aspect disarmament demobilization phase ddr programme includes short term disarmament activity weapon collection registration also longer term disarmament activity support establishment legal regime control small arm light weapon community weapon collection initiative mandated component coordinate military assist destruction weapon ammunition unexploded ordnance n reintegration component plan economic social reintegration strategy also plan reinsertion programme ensure consistency coherence overall reintegration strategy need work closely part mission facilitating return reintegration internally displaced person idp refugee n monitoring evaluation component responsible setting monitoring indicator measure achievement phase ddr programme also conduct ddr related survey small arm baseline survey profiling parti cipants beneficiary mapping economic opportunity etc n public information sensitization component work develop public informa tion sensitization strategy ddr programme draw direct support public information unit peacekeeping mission also employ information dissemination personnel within mission military police civil affair officer well local mechanism theatre group adminis trative structure etc n administrative financial management small component unit may seconded integrating un entity support programme delivery aspect ddr unit role utilize administrative financial capacity un country office n regional ddr office regional implementing component ddr unit would implement programme local level close cooperation regionalized component civil affair military police etc", "ProcessedSent": "need work closely part mission facilitating return reintegration internally displaced person idp refugee n monitoring evaluation component responsible setting monitoring indicator measure achievement phase ddr programme", "SentID": 3305 }, { "ParagraphID": 1098, - "Paragraph": "The integrated DDR unit, in general terms, should fulfil the following functions: \\n Political and programme management: The chief and deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit are responsible for the overall political and programme management. Both the chief and his\/her deputy will work to ensure that the DDR programme supports the overall peace process and mission objectives, and that there is close cooperation and collaboration with national stakeholders and other implementing partners, such as other UN entities, international organizations, non\u00adgovernmental organizations (NGOs) and the donor community; \\n Overall DDR planning and coordination: This component of the DDR unit is responsible for the overall development of the DDR programme. Seconded personnel from UN agencies, funds and programmes will work in this section to contribute to the joint planning and coordination of the DDR programme. Attached military and police per\u00ad sonnel from within the mission will also form part of this component; \\n Disarmament and demobilization: This component will be responsible for the overall implementation and management of all aspects of the disarmament and demobilization phases of the DDR programme. This includes short\u00adterm disarmament activities, such as weapons collection and registration, but also longer\u00adterm disarmament activities that support the establishment of a legal regime for the control of small arms and light weapons, and other community weapons collection initiatives. Where mandated, this component will coordinate with the military to assist in the destruction of weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance; \\n Reintegration: This component plans the economic and social reintegration strategies. It also plans the reinsertion programme to ensure consistency and coherence with the overall reintegration strategy. It needs to work closely with other parts of the mission facilitating the return and reintegration of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees; \\n Monitoring and evaluation: This component is responsible for setting up and monitoring indicators to measure the achievements in all phases of the DDR programme. It also conducts DDR\u00adrelated surveys such as small arms baseline surveys, profiling of parti\u00ad cipants and beneficiaries, mapping of economic opportunities, etc.; \\n Public information and sensitization: This component works to develop the public informa\u00ad tion and sensitization strategy for the DDR programme. It draws on the direct support of the public information unit in the peacekeeping mission, but also employs other information dissemination personnel within the mission, such as the military, police and civil affairs officers, as well as local mechanisms such as theatre groups, adminis\u00ad trative structures, etc.; \\n Administrative and financial management: This is a small component of the unit, which may be seconded from an integrating UN entity to support the programme delivery aspect of the DDR unit. Its role is to utilize the administrative and financial capacities of the UN country office; \\n Regional DDR offices: These are the regional implementing components of the DDR unit, which would implement programmes at the local level in close cooperation with the other regionalized components of civil affairs, military, police, etc.", + "Paragraph": "The integrated DDR unit, in general terms, should fulfil the following functions: \n Political and programme management: The chief and deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit are responsible for the overall political and programme management. Both the chief and his\/her deputy will work to ensure that the DDR programme supports the overall peace process and mission objectives, and that there is close cooperation and collaboration with national stakeholders and other implementing partners, such as other UN entities, international organizations, non\u00adgovernmental organizations (NGOs) and the donor community; \n Overall DDR planning and coordination: This component of the DDR unit is responsible for the overall development of the DDR programme. Seconded personnel from UN agencies, funds and programmes will work in this section to contribute to the joint planning and coordination of the DDR programme. Attached military and police per\u00ad sonnel from within the mission will also form part of this component; \n Disarmament and demobilization: This component will be responsible for the overall implementation and management of all aspects of the disarmament and demobilization phases of the DDR programme. This includes short\u00adterm disarmament activities, such as weapons collection and registration, but also longer\u00adterm disarmament activities that support the establishment of a legal regime for the control of small arms and light weapons, and other community weapons collection initiatives. Where mandated, this component will coordinate with the military to assist in the destruction of weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance; \n Reintegration: This component plans the economic and social reintegration strategies. It also plans the reinsertion programme to ensure consistency and coherence with the overall reintegration strategy. It needs to work closely with other parts of the mission facilitating the return and reintegration of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees; \n Monitoring and evaluation: This component is responsible for setting up and monitoring indicators to measure the achievements in all phases of the DDR programme. It also conducts DDR\u00adrelated surveys such as small arms baseline surveys, profiling of parti\u00ad cipants and beneficiaries, mapping of economic opportunities, etc.; \n Public information and sensitization: This component works to develop the public informa\u00ad tion and sensitization strategy for the DDR programme. It draws on the direct support of the public information unit in the peacekeeping mission, but also employs other information dissemination personnel within the mission, such as the military, police and civil affairs officers, as well as local mechanisms such as theatre groups, adminis\u00ad trative structures, etc.; \n Administrative and financial management: This is a small component of the unit, which may be seconded from an integrating UN entity to support the programme delivery aspect of the DDR unit. Its role is to utilize the administrative and financial capacities of the UN country office; \n Regional DDR offices: These are the regional implementing components of the DDR unit, which would implement programmes at the local level in close cooperation with the other regionalized components of civil affairs, military, police, etc.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59527,7 +59527,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1098, - "Paragraph": "The integrated DDR unit, in general terms, should fulfil the following functions: \\n Political and programme management: The chief and deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit are responsible for the overall political and programme management. Both the chief and his\/her deputy will work to ensure that the DDR programme supports the overall peace process and mission objectives, and that there is close cooperation and collaboration with national stakeholders and other implementing partners, such as other UN entities, international organizations, non\u00adgovernmental organizations (NGOs) and the donor community; \\n Overall DDR planning and coordination: This component of the DDR unit is responsible for the overall development of the DDR programme. Seconded personnel from UN agencies, funds and programmes will work in this section to contribute to the joint planning and coordination of the DDR programme. Attached military and police per\u00ad sonnel from within the mission will also form part of this component; \\n Disarmament and demobilization: This component will be responsible for the overall implementation and management of all aspects of the disarmament and demobilization phases of the DDR programme. This includes short\u00adterm disarmament activities, such as weapons collection and registration, but also longer\u00adterm disarmament activities that support the establishment of a legal regime for the control of small arms and light weapons, and other community weapons collection initiatives. Where mandated, this component will coordinate with the military to assist in the destruction of weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance; \\n Reintegration: This component plans the economic and social reintegration strategies. It also plans the reinsertion programme to ensure consistency and coherence with the overall reintegration strategy. It needs to work closely with other parts of the mission facilitating the return and reintegration of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees; \\n Monitoring and evaluation: This component is responsible for setting up and monitoring indicators to measure the achievements in all phases of the DDR programme. It also conducts DDR\u00adrelated surveys such as small arms baseline surveys, profiling of parti\u00ad cipants and beneficiaries, mapping of economic opportunities, etc.; \\n Public information and sensitization: This component works to develop the public informa\u00ad tion and sensitization strategy for the DDR programme. It draws on the direct support of the public information unit in the peacekeeping mission, but also employs other information dissemination personnel within the mission, such as the military, police and civil affairs officers, as well as local mechanisms such as theatre groups, adminis\u00ad trative structures, etc.; \\n Administrative and financial management: This is a small component of the unit, which may be seconded from an integrating UN entity to support the programme delivery aspect of the DDR unit. Its role is to utilize the administrative and financial capacities of the UN country office; \\n Regional DDR offices: These are the regional implementing components of the DDR unit, which would implement programmes at the local level in close cooperation with the other regionalized components of civil affairs, military, police, etc.", + "Paragraph": "The integrated DDR unit, in general terms, should fulfil the following functions: \n Political and programme management: The chief and deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit are responsible for the overall political and programme management. Both the chief and his\/her deputy will work to ensure that the DDR programme supports the overall peace process and mission objectives, and that there is close cooperation and collaboration with national stakeholders and other implementing partners, such as other UN entities, international organizations, non\u00adgovernmental organizations (NGOs) and the donor community; \n Overall DDR planning and coordination: This component of the DDR unit is responsible for the overall development of the DDR programme. Seconded personnel from UN agencies, funds and programmes will work in this section to contribute to the joint planning and coordination of the DDR programme. Attached military and police per\u00ad sonnel from within the mission will also form part of this component; \n Disarmament and demobilization: This component will be responsible for the overall implementation and management of all aspects of the disarmament and demobilization phases of the DDR programme. This includes short\u00adterm disarmament activities, such as weapons collection and registration, but also longer\u00adterm disarmament activities that support the establishment of a legal regime for the control of small arms and light weapons, and other community weapons collection initiatives. Where mandated, this component will coordinate with the military to assist in the destruction of weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance; \n Reintegration: This component plans the economic and social reintegration strategies. It also plans the reinsertion programme to ensure consistency and coherence with the overall reintegration strategy. It needs to work closely with other parts of the mission facilitating the return and reintegration of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees; \n Monitoring and evaluation: This component is responsible for setting up and monitoring indicators to measure the achievements in all phases of the DDR programme. It also conducts DDR\u00adrelated surveys such as small arms baseline surveys, profiling of parti\u00ad cipants and beneficiaries, mapping of economic opportunities, etc.; \n Public information and sensitization: This component works to develop the public informa\u00ad tion and sensitization strategy for the DDR programme. It draws on the direct support of the public information unit in the peacekeeping mission, but also employs other information dissemination personnel within the mission, such as the military, police and civil affairs officers, as well as local mechanisms such as theatre groups, adminis\u00ad trative structures, etc.; \n Administrative and financial management: This is a small component of the unit, which may be seconded from an integrating UN entity to support the programme delivery aspect of the DDR unit. Its role is to utilize the administrative and financial capacities of the UN country office; \n Regional DDR offices: These are the regional implementing components of the DDR unit, which would implement programmes at the local level in close cooperation with the other regionalized components of civil affairs, military, police, etc.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59538,14 +59538,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1. Components of the integrated DDR unit", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "; \\n Public information and sensitization: This component works to develop the public informa\u00ad tion and sensitization strategy for the DDR programme.", + "Sentence": "; \n Public information and sensitization: This component works to develop the public informa\u00ad tion and sensitization strategy for the DDR programme.", "newParagraph": "integrated ddr unit general term fulfil following function n political programme management chief deputy chief integrated ddr unit responsible overall political programme management chief hisher deputy work ensure ddr programme support overall peace process mission objective close cooperation collaboration national stakeholder implementing partner un entity international organization non governmental organization ngo donor community n overall ddr planning coordination component ddr unit responsible overall development ddr programme seconded personnel un agency fund programme work section contribute joint planning coordination ddr programme attached military police per sonnel within mission also form part component n disarmament demobilization component responsible overall implementation management aspect disarmament demobilization phase ddr programme includes short term disarmament activity weapon collection registration also longer term disarmament activity support establishment legal regime control small arm light weapon community weapon collection initiative mandated component coordinate military assist destruction weapon ammunition unexploded ordnance n reintegration component plan economic social reintegration strategy also plan reinsertion programme ensure consistency coherence overall reintegration strategy need work closely part mission facilitating return reintegration internally displaced person idp refugee n monitoring evaluation component responsible setting monitoring indicator measure achievement phase ddr programme also conduct ddr related survey small arm baseline survey profiling parti cipants beneficiary mapping economic opportunity etc n public information sensitization component work develop public informa tion sensitization strategy ddr programme draw direct support public information unit peacekeeping mission also employ information dissemination personnel within mission military police civil affair officer well local mechanism theatre group adminis trative structure etc n administrative financial management small component unit may seconded integrating un entity support programme delivery aspect ddr unit role utilize administrative financial capacity un country office n regional ddr office regional implementing component ddr unit would implement programme local level close cooperation regionalized component civil affair military police etc", "ProcessedSent": " n public information sensitization component work develop public informa tion sensitization strategy ddr programme", "SentID": 3307 }, { "ParagraphID": 1098, - "Paragraph": "The integrated DDR unit, in general terms, should fulfil the following functions: \\n Political and programme management: The chief and deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit are responsible for the overall political and programme management. Both the chief and his\/her deputy will work to ensure that the DDR programme supports the overall peace process and mission objectives, and that there is close cooperation and collaboration with national stakeholders and other implementing partners, such as other UN entities, international organizations, non\u00adgovernmental organizations (NGOs) and the donor community; \\n Overall DDR planning and coordination: This component of the DDR unit is responsible for the overall development of the DDR programme. Seconded personnel from UN agencies, funds and programmes will work in this section to contribute to the joint planning and coordination of the DDR programme. Attached military and police per\u00ad sonnel from within the mission will also form part of this component; \\n Disarmament and demobilization: This component will be responsible for the overall implementation and management of all aspects of the disarmament and demobilization phases of the DDR programme. This includes short\u00adterm disarmament activities, such as weapons collection and registration, but also longer\u00adterm disarmament activities that support the establishment of a legal regime for the control of small arms and light weapons, and other community weapons collection initiatives. Where mandated, this component will coordinate with the military to assist in the destruction of weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance; \\n Reintegration: This component plans the economic and social reintegration strategies. It also plans the reinsertion programme to ensure consistency and coherence with the overall reintegration strategy. It needs to work closely with other parts of the mission facilitating the return and reintegration of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees; \\n Monitoring and evaluation: This component is responsible for setting up and monitoring indicators to measure the achievements in all phases of the DDR programme. It also conducts DDR\u00adrelated surveys such as small arms baseline surveys, profiling of parti\u00ad cipants and beneficiaries, mapping of economic opportunities, etc.; \\n Public information and sensitization: This component works to develop the public informa\u00ad tion and sensitization strategy for the DDR programme. It draws on the direct support of the public information unit in the peacekeeping mission, but also employs other information dissemination personnel within the mission, such as the military, police and civil affairs officers, as well as local mechanisms such as theatre groups, adminis\u00ad trative structures, etc.; \\n Administrative and financial management: This is a small component of the unit, which may be seconded from an integrating UN entity to support the programme delivery aspect of the DDR unit. Its role is to utilize the administrative and financial capacities of the UN country office; \\n Regional DDR offices: These are the regional implementing components of the DDR unit, which would implement programmes at the local level in close cooperation with the other regionalized components of civil affairs, military, police, etc.", + "Paragraph": "The integrated DDR unit, in general terms, should fulfil the following functions: \n Political and programme management: The chief and deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit are responsible for the overall political and programme management. Both the chief and his\/her deputy will work to ensure that the DDR programme supports the overall peace process and mission objectives, and that there is close cooperation and collaboration with national stakeholders and other implementing partners, such as other UN entities, international organizations, non\u00adgovernmental organizations (NGOs) and the donor community; \n Overall DDR planning and coordination: This component of the DDR unit is responsible for the overall development of the DDR programme. Seconded personnel from UN agencies, funds and programmes will work in this section to contribute to the joint planning and coordination of the DDR programme. Attached military and police per\u00ad sonnel from within the mission will also form part of this component; \n Disarmament and demobilization: This component will be responsible for the overall implementation and management of all aspects of the disarmament and demobilization phases of the DDR programme. This includes short\u00adterm disarmament activities, such as weapons collection and registration, but also longer\u00adterm disarmament activities that support the establishment of a legal regime for the control of small arms and light weapons, and other community weapons collection initiatives. Where mandated, this component will coordinate with the military to assist in the destruction of weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance; \n Reintegration: This component plans the economic and social reintegration strategies. It also plans the reinsertion programme to ensure consistency and coherence with the overall reintegration strategy. It needs to work closely with other parts of the mission facilitating the return and reintegration of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees; \n Monitoring and evaluation: This component is responsible for setting up and monitoring indicators to measure the achievements in all phases of the DDR programme. It also conducts DDR\u00adrelated surveys such as small arms baseline surveys, profiling of parti\u00ad cipants and beneficiaries, mapping of economic opportunities, etc.; \n Public information and sensitization: This component works to develop the public informa\u00ad tion and sensitization strategy for the DDR programme. It draws on the direct support of the public information unit in the peacekeeping mission, but also employs other information dissemination personnel within the mission, such as the military, police and civil affairs officers, as well as local mechanisms such as theatre groups, adminis\u00ad trative structures, etc.; \n Administrative and financial management: This is a small component of the unit, which may be seconded from an integrating UN entity to support the programme delivery aspect of the DDR unit. Its role is to utilize the administrative and financial capacities of the UN country office; \n Regional DDR offices: These are the regional implementing components of the DDR unit, which would implement programmes at the local level in close cooperation with the other regionalized components of civil affairs, military, police, etc.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59563,7 +59563,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1098, - "Paragraph": "The integrated DDR unit, in general terms, should fulfil the following functions: \\n Political and programme management: The chief and deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit are responsible for the overall political and programme management. Both the chief and his\/her deputy will work to ensure that the DDR programme supports the overall peace process and mission objectives, and that there is close cooperation and collaboration with national stakeholders and other implementing partners, such as other UN entities, international organizations, non\u00adgovernmental organizations (NGOs) and the donor community; \\n Overall DDR planning and coordination: This component of the DDR unit is responsible for the overall development of the DDR programme. Seconded personnel from UN agencies, funds and programmes will work in this section to contribute to the joint planning and coordination of the DDR programme. Attached military and police per\u00ad sonnel from within the mission will also form part of this component; \\n Disarmament and demobilization: This component will be responsible for the overall implementation and management of all aspects of the disarmament and demobilization phases of the DDR programme. This includes short\u00adterm disarmament activities, such as weapons collection and registration, but also longer\u00adterm disarmament activities that support the establishment of a legal regime for the control of small arms and light weapons, and other community weapons collection initiatives. Where mandated, this component will coordinate with the military to assist in the destruction of weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance; \\n Reintegration: This component plans the economic and social reintegration strategies. It also plans the reinsertion programme to ensure consistency and coherence with the overall reintegration strategy. It needs to work closely with other parts of the mission facilitating the return and reintegration of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees; \\n Monitoring and evaluation: This component is responsible for setting up and monitoring indicators to measure the achievements in all phases of the DDR programme. It also conducts DDR\u00adrelated surveys such as small arms baseline surveys, profiling of parti\u00ad cipants and beneficiaries, mapping of economic opportunities, etc.; \\n Public information and sensitization: This component works to develop the public informa\u00ad tion and sensitization strategy for the DDR programme. It draws on the direct support of the public information unit in the peacekeeping mission, but also employs other information dissemination personnel within the mission, such as the military, police and civil affairs officers, as well as local mechanisms such as theatre groups, adminis\u00ad trative structures, etc.; \\n Administrative and financial management: This is a small component of the unit, which may be seconded from an integrating UN entity to support the programme delivery aspect of the DDR unit. Its role is to utilize the administrative and financial capacities of the UN country office; \\n Regional DDR offices: These are the regional implementing components of the DDR unit, which would implement programmes at the local level in close cooperation with the other regionalized components of civil affairs, military, police, etc.", + "Paragraph": "The integrated DDR unit, in general terms, should fulfil the following functions: \n Political and programme management: The chief and deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit are responsible for the overall political and programme management. Both the chief and his\/her deputy will work to ensure that the DDR programme supports the overall peace process and mission objectives, and that there is close cooperation and collaboration with national stakeholders and other implementing partners, such as other UN entities, international organizations, non\u00adgovernmental organizations (NGOs) and the donor community; \n Overall DDR planning and coordination: This component of the DDR unit is responsible for the overall development of the DDR programme. Seconded personnel from UN agencies, funds and programmes will work in this section to contribute to the joint planning and coordination of the DDR programme. Attached military and police per\u00ad sonnel from within the mission will also form part of this component; \n Disarmament and demobilization: This component will be responsible for the overall implementation and management of all aspects of the disarmament and demobilization phases of the DDR programme. This includes short\u00adterm disarmament activities, such as weapons collection and registration, but also longer\u00adterm disarmament activities that support the establishment of a legal regime for the control of small arms and light weapons, and other community weapons collection initiatives. Where mandated, this component will coordinate with the military to assist in the destruction of weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance; \n Reintegration: This component plans the economic and social reintegration strategies. It also plans the reinsertion programme to ensure consistency and coherence with the overall reintegration strategy. It needs to work closely with other parts of the mission facilitating the return and reintegration of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees; \n Monitoring and evaluation: This component is responsible for setting up and monitoring indicators to measure the achievements in all phases of the DDR programme. It also conducts DDR\u00adrelated surveys such as small arms baseline surveys, profiling of parti\u00ad cipants and beneficiaries, mapping of economic opportunities, etc.; \n Public information and sensitization: This component works to develop the public informa\u00ad tion and sensitization strategy for the DDR programme. It draws on the direct support of the public information unit in the peacekeeping mission, but also employs other information dissemination personnel within the mission, such as the military, police and civil affairs officers, as well as local mechanisms such as theatre groups, adminis\u00ad trative structures, etc.; \n Administrative and financial management: This is a small component of the unit, which may be seconded from an integrating UN entity to support the programme delivery aspect of the DDR unit. Its role is to utilize the administrative and financial capacities of the UN country office; \n Regional DDR offices: These are the regional implementing components of the DDR unit, which would implement programmes at the local level in close cooperation with the other regionalized components of civil affairs, military, police, etc.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59574,14 +59574,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1. Components of the integrated DDR unit", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "; \\n Administrative and financial management: This is a small component of the unit, which may be seconded from an integrating UN entity to support the programme delivery aspect of the DDR unit.", + "Sentence": "; \n Administrative and financial management: This is a small component of the unit, which may be seconded from an integrating UN entity to support the programme delivery aspect of the DDR unit.", "newParagraph": "integrated ddr unit general term fulfil following function n political programme management chief deputy chief integrated ddr unit responsible overall political programme management chief hisher deputy work ensure ddr programme support overall peace process mission objective close cooperation collaboration national stakeholder implementing partner un entity international organization non governmental organization ngo donor community n overall ddr planning coordination component ddr unit responsible overall development ddr programme seconded personnel un agency fund programme work section contribute joint planning coordination ddr programme attached military police per sonnel within mission also form part component n disarmament demobilization component responsible overall implementation management aspect disarmament demobilization phase ddr programme includes short term disarmament activity weapon collection registration also longer term disarmament activity support establishment legal regime control small arm light weapon community weapon collection initiative mandated component coordinate military assist destruction weapon ammunition unexploded ordnance n reintegration component plan economic social reintegration strategy also plan reinsertion programme ensure consistency coherence overall reintegration strategy need work closely part mission facilitating return reintegration internally displaced person idp refugee n monitoring evaluation component responsible setting monitoring indicator measure achievement phase ddr programme also conduct ddr related survey small arm baseline survey profiling parti cipants beneficiary mapping economic opportunity etc n public information sensitization component work develop public informa tion sensitization strategy ddr programme draw direct support public information unit peacekeeping mission also employ information dissemination personnel within mission military police civil affair officer well local mechanism theatre group adminis trative structure etc n administrative financial management small component unit may seconded integrating un entity support programme delivery aspect ddr unit role utilize administrative financial capacity un country office n regional ddr office regional implementing component ddr unit would implement programme local level close cooperation regionalized component civil affair military police etc", "ProcessedSent": " n administrative financial management small component unit may seconded integrating un entity support programme delivery aspect ddr unit", "SentID": 3309 }, { "ParagraphID": 1098, - "Paragraph": "The integrated DDR unit, in general terms, should fulfil the following functions: \\n Political and programme management: The chief and deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit are responsible for the overall political and programme management. Both the chief and his\/her deputy will work to ensure that the DDR programme supports the overall peace process and mission objectives, and that there is close cooperation and collaboration with national stakeholders and other implementing partners, such as other UN entities, international organizations, non\u00adgovernmental organizations (NGOs) and the donor community; \\n Overall DDR planning and coordination: This component of the DDR unit is responsible for the overall development of the DDR programme. Seconded personnel from UN agencies, funds and programmes will work in this section to contribute to the joint planning and coordination of the DDR programme. Attached military and police per\u00ad sonnel from within the mission will also form part of this component; \\n Disarmament and demobilization: This component will be responsible for the overall implementation and management of all aspects of the disarmament and demobilization phases of the DDR programme. This includes short\u00adterm disarmament activities, such as weapons collection and registration, but also longer\u00adterm disarmament activities that support the establishment of a legal regime for the control of small arms and light weapons, and other community weapons collection initiatives. Where mandated, this component will coordinate with the military to assist in the destruction of weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance; \\n Reintegration: This component plans the economic and social reintegration strategies. It also plans the reinsertion programme to ensure consistency and coherence with the overall reintegration strategy. It needs to work closely with other parts of the mission facilitating the return and reintegration of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees; \\n Monitoring and evaluation: This component is responsible for setting up and monitoring indicators to measure the achievements in all phases of the DDR programme. It also conducts DDR\u00adrelated surveys such as small arms baseline surveys, profiling of parti\u00ad cipants and beneficiaries, mapping of economic opportunities, etc.; \\n Public information and sensitization: This component works to develop the public informa\u00ad tion and sensitization strategy for the DDR programme. It draws on the direct support of the public information unit in the peacekeeping mission, but also employs other information dissemination personnel within the mission, such as the military, police and civil affairs officers, as well as local mechanisms such as theatre groups, adminis\u00ad trative structures, etc.; \\n Administrative and financial management: This is a small component of the unit, which may be seconded from an integrating UN entity to support the programme delivery aspect of the DDR unit. Its role is to utilize the administrative and financial capacities of the UN country office; \\n Regional DDR offices: These are the regional implementing components of the DDR unit, which would implement programmes at the local level in close cooperation with the other regionalized components of civil affairs, military, police, etc.", + "Paragraph": "The integrated DDR unit, in general terms, should fulfil the following functions: \n Political and programme management: The chief and deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit are responsible for the overall political and programme management. Both the chief and his\/her deputy will work to ensure that the DDR programme supports the overall peace process and mission objectives, and that there is close cooperation and collaboration with national stakeholders and other implementing partners, such as other UN entities, international organizations, non\u00adgovernmental organizations (NGOs) and the donor community; \n Overall DDR planning and coordination: This component of the DDR unit is responsible for the overall development of the DDR programme. Seconded personnel from UN agencies, funds and programmes will work in this section to contribute to the joint planning and coordination of the DDR programme. Attached military and police per\u00ad sonnel from within the mission will also form part of this component; \n Disarmament and demobilization: This component will be responsible for the overall implementation and management of all aspects of the disarmament and demobilization phases of the DDR programme. This includes short\u00adterm disarmament activities, such as weapons collection and registration, but also longer\u00adterm disarmament activities that support the establishment of a legal regime for the control of small arms and light weapons, and other community weapons collection initiatives. Where mandated, this component will coordinate with the military to assist in the destruction of weapons, ammunition and unexploded ordnance; \n Reintegration: This component plans the economic and social reintegration strategies. It also plans the reinsertion programme to ensure consistency and coherence with the overall reintegration strategy. It needs to work closely with other parts of the mission facilitating the return and reintegration of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees; \n Monitoring and evaluation: This component is responsible for setting up and monitoring indicators to measure the achievements in all phases of the DDR programme. It also conducts DDR\u00adrelated surveys such as small arms baseline surveys, profiling of parti\u00ad cipants and beneficiaries, mapping of economic opportunities, etc.; \n Public information and sensitization: This component works to develop the public informa\u00ad tion and sensitization strategy for the DDR programme. It draws on the direct support of the public information unit in the peacekeeping mission, but also employs other information dissemination personnel within the mission, such as the military, police and civil affairs officers, as well as local mechanisms such as theatre groups, adminis\u00ad trative structures, etc.; \n Administrative and financial management: This is a small component of the unit, which may be seconded from an integrating UN entity to support the programme delivery aspect of the DDR unit. Its role is to utilize the administrative and financial capacities of the UN country office; \n Regional DDR offices: These are the regional implementing components of the DDR unit, which would implement programmes at the local level in close cooperation with the other regionalized components of civil affairs, military, police, etc.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59592,14 +59592,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1. Components of the integrated DDR unit", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Its role is to utilize the administrative and financial capacities of the UN country office; \\n Regional DDR offices: These are the regional implementing components of the DDR unit, which would implement programmes at the local level in close cooperation with the other regionalized components of civil affairs, military, police, etc.", + "Sentence": "Its role is to utilize the administrative and financial capacities of the UN country office; \n Regional DDR offices: These are the regional implementing components of the DDR unit, which would implement programmes at the local level in close cooperation with the other regionalized components of civil affairs, military, police, etc.", "newParagraph": "integrated ddr unit general term fulfil following function n political programme management chief deputy chief integrated ddr unit responsible overall political programme management chief hisher deputy work ensure ddr programme support overall peace process mission objective close cooperation collaboration national stakeholder implementing partner un entity international organization non governmental organization ngo donor community n overall ddr planning coordination component ddr unit responsible overall development ddr programme seconded personnel un agency fund programme work section contribute joint planning coordination ddr programme attached military police per sonnel within mission also form part component n disarmament demobilization component responsible overall implementation management aspect disarmament demobilization phase ddr programme includes short term disarmament activity weapon collection registration also longer term disarmament activity support establishment legal regime control small arm light weapon community weapon collection initiative mandated component coordinate military assist destruction weapon ammunition unexploded ordnance n reintegration component plan economic social reintegration strategy also plan reinsertion programme ensure consistency coherence overall reintegration strategy need work closely part mission facilitating return reintegration internally displaced person idp refugee n monitoring evaluation component responsible setting monitoring indicator measure achievement phase ddr programme also conduct ddr related survey small arm baseline survey profiling parti cipants beneficiary mapping economic opportunity etc n public information sensitization component work develop public informa tion sensitization strategy ddr programme draw direct support public information unit peacekeeping mission also employ information dissemination personnel within mission military police civil affair officer well local mechanism theatre group adminis trative structure etc n administrative financial management small component unit may seconded integrating un entity support programme delivery aspect ddr unit role utilize administrative financial capacity un country office n regional ddr office regional implementing component ddr unit would implement programme local level close cooperation regionalized component civil affair military police etc", "ProcessedSent": "role utilize administrative financial capacity un country office n regional ddr office regional implementing component ddr unit would implement programme local level close cooperation regionalized component civil affair military police etc", "SentID": 3310 }, { "ParagraphID": 1099, - "Paragraph": "DPKO and UNDP are in the process of developing an MoU on the establishment of an integrated DDR unit in a peacekeeping mission. For the time being, the following principles shall guide the establishment of the integrated DDR unit: \\n Joint management of the DDR unit: The chief of the DDR unit shall come from the peace\u00ad keeping mission. His\/Her post shall be funded from the peacekeeping assessed budget. The deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit shall be seconded from UNDP, although the peacekeeping mission will provide him\/her with administrative and logistic support for him\/her to perform his\/her function as deputy chief of the DDR unit. Such integration allows the DDR unit to use the particular skills of both the mission and the country office, maximizing existing local knowledge and ensuring a smooth transition on DDR\u00adrelated issues when the mandate of the peacekeeping mission ends; \\n Administrative and finance cell from UNDP: UNDP shall second a small administrative and finance cell from its country office to support the programme delivery aspects of the DDR component. The principles of secondment use for the deputy chief of the DDR unit shall apply; \\n Secondment of staff from other UN entities: In order to maximize coherence and coordina\u00ad tion on DDR between missions and UN agencies, staff members from other agencies may be seconded to specific posts in the integrated DDR unit. Use of this method ensures the active engagement and participation of UN agencies in strategic policy decisions and coordination of UN DDR activities (including both mission operational support and programme implementation). The integration and co\u00adlocation of UN agency staff in this structure are essential, given the complex and highly operational nature of DDR. Decisions on secondment shall be made at the earliest stages of planning to ensure that the proper budgetary support is secure to support the integrated DDR unit and the seconded personnel; \\n Project support units: Core UN agency staff seconded to the integrated DDR unit may be complemented by additional project support staff located in project support units (PSUs) in order to provide capacity (programme, monitoring, operations, finance) for implementing key elements of UN assistance within the national planning and pro\u00ad gramme framework for DDR. The PSU will also be responsible for ensuring links and coordination with other agency programme areas (particularly in rule of law and security sector reform). Additional PSUs managed by other UN agencies can also be established, depending on the implementation\/operational role attributed to them; \\n Links with other parts of the peacekeeping mission: The integrated DDR unit shall be closely linked with other parts of the peacekeeping mission, in particular the military and the police, to ensure a \u2018joined\u00adup\u2019 approach to the DDR programme.", + "Paragraph": "DPKO and UNDP are in the process of developing an MoU on the establishment of an integrated DDR unit in a peacekeeping mission. For the time being, the following principles shall guide the establishment of the integrated DDR unit: \n Joint management of the DDR unit: The chief of the DDR unit shall come from the peace\u00ad keeping mission. His\/Her post shall be funded from the peacekeeping assessed budget. The deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit shall be seconded from UNDP, although the peacekeeping mission will provide him\/her with administrative and logistic support for him\/her to perform his\/her function as deputy chief of the DDR unit. Such integration allows the DDR unit to use the particular skills of both the mission and the country office, maximizing existing local knowledge and ensuring a smooth transition on DDR\u00adrelated issues when the mandate of the peacekeeping mission ends; \n Administrative and finance cell from UNDP: UNDP shall second a small administrative and finance cell from its country office to support the programme delivery aspects of the DDR component. The principles of secondment use for the deputy chief of the DDR unit shall apply; \n Secondment of staff from other UN entities: In order to maximize coherence and coordina\u00ad tion on DDR between missions and UN agencies, staff members from other agencies may be seconded to specific posts in the integrated DDR unit. Use of this method ensures the active engagement and participation of UN agencies in strategic policy decisions and coordination of UN DDR activities (including both mission operational support and programme implementation). The integration and co\u00adlocation of UN agency staff in this structure are essential, given the complex and highly operational nature of DDR. Decisions on secondment shall be made at the earliest stages of planning to ensure that the proper budgetary support is secure to support the integrated DDR unit and the seconded personnel; \n Project support units: Core UN agency staff seconded to the integrated DDR unit may be complemented by additional project support staff located in project support units (PSUs) in order to provide capacity (programme, monitoring, operations, finance) for implementing key elements of UN assistance within the national planning and pro\u00ad gramme framework for DDR. The PSU will also be responsible for ensuring links and coordination with other agency programme areas (particularly in rule of law and security sector reform). Additional PSUs managed by other UN agencies can also be established, depending on the implementation\/operational role attributed to them; \n Links with other parts of the peacekeeping mission: The integrated DDR unit shall be closely linked with other parts of the peacekeeping mission, in particular the military and the police, to ensure a \u2018joined\u00adup\u2019 approach to the DDR programme.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59617,7 +59617,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1099, - "Paragraph": "DPKO and UNDP are in the process of developing an MoU on the establishment of an integrated DDR unit in a peacekeeping mission. For the time being, the following principles shall guide the establishment of the integrated DDR unit: \\n Joint management of the DDR unit: The chief of the DDR unit shall come from the peace\u00ad keeping mission. His\/Her post shall be funded from the peacekeeping assessed budget. The deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit shall be seconded from UNDP, although the peacekeeping mission will provide him\/her with administrative and logistic support for him\/her to perform his\/her function as deputy chief of the DDR unit. Such integration allows the DDR unit to use the particular skills of both the mission and the country office, maximizing existing local knowledge and ensuring a smooth transition on DDR\u00adrelated issues when the mandate of the peacekeeping mission ends; \\n Administrative and finance cell from UNDP: UNDP shall second a small administrative and finance cell from its country office to support the programme delivery aspects of the DDR component. The principles of secondment use for the deputy chief of the DDR unit shall apply; \\n Secondment of staff from other UN entities: In order to maximize coherence and coordina\u00ad tion on DDR between missions and UN agencies, staff members from other agencies may be seconded to specific posts in the integrated DDR unit. Use of this method ensures the active engagement and participation of UN agencies in strategic policy decisions and coordination of UN DDR activities (including both mission operational support and programme implementation). The integration and co\u00adlocation of UN agency staff in this structure are essential, given the complex and highly operational nature of DDR. Decisions on secondment shall be made at the earliest stages of planning to ensure that the proper budgetary support is secure to support the integrated DDR unit and the seconded personnel; \\n Project support units: Core UN agency staff seconded to the integrated DDR unit may be complemented by additional project support staff located in project support units (PSUs) in order to provide capacity (programme, monitoring, operations, finance) for implementing key elements of UN assistance within the national planning and pro\u00ad gramme framework for DDR. The PSU will also be responsible for ensuring links and coordination with other agency programme areas (particularly in rule of law and security sector reform). Additional PSUs managed by other UN agencies can also be established, depending on the implementation\/operational role attributed to them; \\n Links with other parts of the peacekeeping mission: The integrated DDR unit shall be closely linked with other parts of the peacekeeping mission, in particular the military and the police, to ensure a \u2018joined\u00adup\u2019 approach to the DDR programme.", + "Paragraph": "DPKO and UNDP are in the process of developing an MoU on the establishment of an integrated DDR unit in a peacekeeping mission. For the time being, the following principles shall guide the establishment of the integrated DDR unit: \n Joint management of the DDR unit: The chief of the DDR unit shall come from the peace\u00ad keeping mission. His\/Her post shall be funded from the peacekeeping assessed budget. The deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit shall be seconded from UNDP, although the peacekeeping mission will provide him\/her with administrative and logistic support for him\/her to perform his\/her function as deputy chief of the DDR unit. Such integration allows the DDR unit to use the particular skills of both the mission and the country office, maximizing existing local knowledge and ensuring a smooth transition on DDR\u00adrelated issues when the mandate of the peacekeeping mission ends; \n Administrative and finance cell from UNDP: UNDP shall second a small administrative and finance cell from its country office to support the programme delivery aspects of the DDR component. The principles of secondment use for the deputy chief of the DDR unit shall apply; \n Secondment of staff from other UN entities: In order to maximize coherence and coordina\u00ad tion on DDR between missions and UN agencies, staff members from other agencies may be seconded to specific posts in the integrated DDR unit. Use of this method ensures the active engagement and participation of UN agencies in strategic policy decisions and coordination of UN DDR activities (including both mission operational support and programme implementation). The integration and co\u00adlocation of UN agency staff in this structure are essential, given the complex and highly operational nature of DDR. Decisions on secondment shall be made at the earliest stages of planning to ensure that the proper budgetary support is secure to support the integrated DDR unit and the seconded personnel; \n Project support units: Core UN agency staff seconded to the integrated DDR unit may be complemented by additional project support staff located in project support units (PSUs) in order to provide capacity (programme, monitoring, operations, finance) for implementing key elements of UN assistance within the national planning and pro\u00ad gramme framework for DDR. The PSU will also be responsible for ensuring links and coordination with other agency programme areas (particularly in rule of law and security sector reform). Additional PSUs managed by other UN agencies can also be established, depending on the implementation\/operational role attributed to them; \n Links with other parts of the peacekeeping mission: The integrated DDR unit shall be closely linked with other parts of the peacekeeping mission, in particular the military and the police, to ensure a \u2018joined\u00adup\u2019 approach to the DDR programme.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59628,14 +59628,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Principles of integration .", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "For the time being, the following principles shall guide the establishment of the integrated DDR unit: \\n Joint management of the DDR unit: The chief of the DDR unit shall come from the peace\u00ad keeping mission.", + "Sentence": "For the time being, the following principles shall guide the establishment of the integrated DDR unit: \n Joint management of the DDR unit: The chief of the DDR unit shall come from the peace\u00ad keeping mission.", "newParagraph": "dpko undp process developing mou establishment integrated ddr unit peacekeeping mission time following principle shall guide establishment integrated ddr unit n joint management ddr unit chief ddr unit shall come peace keeping mission hisher post shall funded peacekeeping assessed budget deputy chief integrated ddr unit shall seconded undp although peacekeeping mission provide himher administrative logistic support himher perform hisher function deputy chief ddr unit integration allows ddr unit use particular skill mission country office maximizing existing local knowledge ensuring smooth transition ddr related issue mandate peacekeeping mission end n administrative finance cell undp undp shall second small administrative finance cell country office support programme delivery aspect ddr component principle secondment use deputy chief ddr unit shall apply n secondment staff un entity order maximize coherence coordina tion ddr mission un agency staff member agency may seconded specific post integrated ddr unit use method ensures active engagement participation un agency strategic policy decision coordination un ddr activity including mission operational support programme implementation integration co location un agency staff structure essential given complex highly operational nature ddr decision secondment shall made earliest stage planning ensure proper budgetary support secure support integrated ddr unit seconded personnel n project support unit core un agency staff seconded integrated ddr unit may complemented additional project support staff located project support unit psus order provide capacity programme monitoring operation finance implementing key element un assistance within national planning pro gramme framework ddr psu also responsible ensuring link coordination agency programme area particularly rule law security sector reform additional psus managed un agency also established depending implementationoperational role attributed n link part peacekeeping mission integrated ddr unit shall closely linked part peacekeeping mission particular military police ensure joined approach ddr programme", "ProcessedSent": "time following principle shall guide establishment integrated ddr unit n joint management ddr unit chief ddr unit shall come peace keeping mission", "SentID": 3312 }, { "ParagraphID": 1099, - "Paragraph": "DPKO and UNDP are in the process of developing an MoU on the establishment of an integrated DDR unit in a peacekeeping mission. For the time being, the following principles shall guide the establishment of the integrated DDR unit: \\n Joint management of the DDR unit: The chief of the DDR unit shall come from the peace\u00ad keeping mission. His\/Her post shall be funded from the peacekeeping assessed budget. The deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit shall be seconded from UNDP, although the peacekeeping mission will provide him\/her with administrative and logistic support for him\/her to perform his\/her function as deputy chief of the DDR unit. Such integration allows the DDR unit to use the particular skills of both the mission and the country office, maximizing existing local knowledge and ensuring a smooth transition on DDR\u00adrelated issues when the mandate of the peacekeeping mission ends; \\n Administrative and finance cell from UNDP: UNDP shall second a small administrative and finance cell from its country office to support the programme delivery aspects of the DDR component. The principles of secondment use for the deputy chief of the DDR unit shall apply; \\n Secondment of staff from other UN entities: In order to maximize coherence and coordina\u00ad tion on DDR between missions and UN agencies, staff members from other agencies may be seconded to specific posts in the integrated DDR unit. Use of this method ensures the active engagement and participation of UN agencies in strategic policy decisions and coordination of UN DDR activities (including both mission operational support and programme implementation). The integration and co\u00adlocation of UN agency staff in this structure are essential, given the complex and highly operational nature of DDR. Decisions on secondment shall be made at the earliest stages of planning to ensure that the proper budgetary support is secure to support the integrated DDR unit and the seconded personnel; \\n Project support units: Core UN agency staff seconded to the integrated DDR unit may be complemented by additional project support staff located in project support units (PSUs) in order to provide capacity (programme, monitoring, operations, finance) for implementing key elements of UN assistance within the national planning and pro\u00ad gramme framework for DDR. The PSU will also be responsible for ensuring links and coordination with other agency programme areas (particularly in rule of law and security sector reform). Additional PSUs managed by other UN agencies can also be established, depending on the implementation\/operational role attributed to them; \\n Links with other parts of the peacekeeping mission: The integrated DDR unit shall be closely linked with other parts of the peacekeeping mission, in particular the military and the police, to ensure a \u2018joined\u00adup\u2019 approach to the DDR programme.", + "Paragraph": "DPKO and UNDP are in the process of developing an MoU on the establishment of an integrated DDR unit in a peacekeeping mission. For the time being, the following principles shall guide the establishment of the integrated DDR unit: \n Joint management of the DDR unit: The chief of the DDR unit shall come from the peace\u00ad keeping mission. His\/Her post shall be funded from the peacekeeping assessed budget. The deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit shall be seconded from UNDP, although the peacekeeping mission will provide him\/her with administrative and logistic support for him\/her to perform his\/her function as deputy chief of the DDR unit. Such integration allows the DDR unit to use the particular skills of both the mission and the country office, maximizing existing local knowledge and ensuring a smooth transition on DDR\u00adrelated issues when the mandate of the peacekeeping mission ends; \n Administrative and finance cell from UNDP: UNDP shall second a small administrative and finance cell from its country office to support the programme delivery aspects of the DDR component. The principles of secondment use for the deputy chief of the DDR unit shall apply; \n Secondment of staff from other UN entities: In order to maximize coherence and coordina\u00ad tion on DDR between missions and UN agencies, staff members from other agencies may be seconded to specific posts in the integrated DDR unit. Use of this method ensures the active engagement and participation of UN agencies in strategic policy decisions and coordination of UN DDR activities (including both mission operational support and programme implementation). The integration and co\u00adlocation of UN agency staff in this structure are essential, given the complex and highly operational nature of DDR. Decisions on secondment shall be made at the earliest stages of planning to ensure that the proper budgetary support is secure to support the integrated DDR unit and the seconded personnel; \n Project support units: Core UN agency staff seconded to the integrated DDR unit may be complemented by additional project support staff located in project support units (PSUs) in order to provide capacity (programme, monitoring, operations, finance) for implementing key elements of UN assistance within the national planning and pro\u00ad gramme framework for DDR. The PSU will also be responsible for ensuring links and coordination with other agency programme areas (particularly in rule of law and security sector reform). Additional PSUs managed by other UN agencies can also be established, depending on the implementation\/operational role attributed to them; \n Links with other parts of the peacekeeping mission: The integrated DDR unit shall be closely linked with other parts of the peacekeeping mission, in particular the military and the police, to ensure a \u2018joined\u00adup\u2019 approach to the DDR programme.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59653,7 +59653,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1099, - "Paragraph": "DPKO and UNDP are in the process of developing an MoU on the establishment of an integrated DDR unit in a peacekeeping mission. For the time being, the following principles shall guide the establishment of the integrated DDR unit: \\n Joint management of the DDR unit: The chief of the DDR unit shall come from the peace\u00ad keeping mission. His\/Her post shall be funded from the peacekeeping assessed budget. The deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit shall be seconded from UNDP, although the peacekeeping mission will provide him\/her with administrative and logistic support for him\/her to perform his\/her function as deputy chief of the DDR unit. Such integration allows the DDR unit to use the particular skills of both the mission and the country office, maximizing existing local knowledge and ensuring a smooth transition on DDR\u00adrelated issues when the mandate of the peacekeeping mission ends; \\n Administrative and finance cell from UNDP: UNDP shall second a small administrative and finance cell from its country office to support the programme delivery aspects of the DDR component. The principles of secondment use for the deputy chief of the DDR unit shall apply; \\n Secondment of staff from other UN entities: In order to maximize coherence and coordina\u00ad tion on DDR between missions and UN agencies, staff members from other agencies may be seconded to specific posts in the integrated DDR unit. Use of this method ensures the active engagement and participation of UN agencies in strategic policy decisions and coordination of UN DDR activities (including both mission operational support and programme implementation). The integration and co\u00adlocation of UN agency staff in this structure are essential, given the complex and highly operational nature of DDR. Decisions on secondment shall be made at the earliest stages of planning to ensure that the proper budgetary support is secure to support the integrated DDR unit and the seconded personnel; \\n Project support units: Core UN agency staff seconded to the integrated DDR unit may be complemented by additional project support staff located in project support units (PSUs) in order to provide capacity (programme, monitoring, operations, finance) for implementing key elements of UN assistance within the national planning and pro\u00ad gramme framework for DDR. The PSU will also be responsible for ensuring links and coordination with other agency programme areas (particularly in rule of law and security sector reform). Additional PSUs managed by other UN agencies can also be established, depending on the implementation\/operational role attributed to them; \\n Links with other parts of the peacekeeping mission: The integrated DDR unit shall be closely linked with other parts of the peacekeeping mission, in particular the military and the police, to ensure a \u2018joined\u00adup\u2019 approach to the DDR programme.", + "Paragraph": "DPKO and UNDP are in the process of developing an MoU on the establishment of an integrated DDR unit in a peacekeeping mission. For the time being, the following principles shall guide the establishment of the integrated DDR unit: \n Joint management of the DDR unit: The chief of the DDR unit shall come from the peace\u00ad keeping mission. His\/Her post shall be funded from the peacekeeping assessed budget. The deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit shall be seconded from UNDP, although the peacekeeping mission will provide him\/her with administrative and logistic support for him\/her to perform his\/her function as deputy chief of the DDR unit. Such integration allows the DDR unit to use the particular skills of both the mission and the country office, maximizing existing local knowledge and ensuring a smooth transition on DDR\u00adrelated issues when the mandate of the peacekeeping mission ends; \n Administrative and finance cell from UNDP: UNDP shall second a small administrative and finance cell from its country office to support the programme delivery aspects of the DDR component. The principles of secondment use for the deputy chief of the DDR unit shall apply; \n Secondment of staff from other UN entities: In order to maximize coherence and coordina\u00ad tion on DDR between missions and UN agencies, staff members from other agencies may be seconded to specific posts in the integrated DDR unit. Use of this method ensures the active engagement and participation of UN agencies in strategic policy decisions and coordination of UN DDR activities (including both mission operational support and programme implementation). The integration and co\u00adlocation of UN agency staff in this structure are essential, given the complex and highly operational nature of DDR. Decisions on secondment shall be made at the earliest stages of planning to ensure that the proper budgetary support is secure to support the integrated DDR unit and the seconded personnel; \n Project support units: Core UN agency staff seconded to the integrated DDR unit may be complemented by additional project support staff located in project support units (PSUs) in order to provide capacity (programme, monitoring, operations, finance) for implementing key elements of UN assistance within the national planning and pro\u00ad gramme framework for DDR. The PSU will also be responsible for ensuring links and coordination with other agency programme areas (particularly in rule of law and security sector reform). Additional PSUs managed by other UN agencies can also be established, depending on the implementation\/operational role attributed to them; \n Links with other parts of the peacekeeping mission: The integrated DDR unit shall be closely linked with other parts of the peacekeeping mission, in particular the military and the police, to ensure a \u2018joined\u00adup\u2019 approach to the DDR programme.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59671,7 +59671,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1099, - "Paragraph": "DPKO and UNDP are in the process of developing an MoU on the establishment of an integrated DDR unit in a peacekeeping mission. For the time being, the following principles shall guide the establishment of the integrated DDR unit: \\n Joint management of the DDR unit: The chief of the DDR unit shall come from the peace\u00ad keeping mission. His\/Her post shall be funded from the peacekeeping assessed budget. The deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit shall be seconded from UNDP, although the peacekeeping mission will provide him\/her with administrative and logistic support for him\/her to perform his\/her function as deputy chief of the DDR unit. Such integration allows the DDR unit to use the particular skills of both the mission and the country office, maximizing existing local knowledge and ensuring a smooth transition on DDR\u00adrelated issues when the mandate of the peacekeeping mission ends; \\n Administrative and finance cell from UNDP: UNDP shall second a small administrative and finance cell from its country office to support the programme delivery aspects of the DDR component. The principles of secondment use for the deputy chief of the DDR unit shall apply; \\n Secondment of staff from other UN entities: In order to maximize coherence and coordina\u00ad tion on DDR between missions and UN agencies, staff members from other agencies may be seconded to specific posts in the integrated DDR unit. Use of this method ensures the active engagement and participation of UN agencies in strategic policy decisions and coordination of UN DDR activities (including both mission operational support and programme implementation). The integration and co\u00adlocation of UN agency staff in this structure are essential, given the complex and highly operational nature of DDR. Decisions on secondment shall be made at the earliest stages of planning to ensure that the proper budgetary support is secure to support the integrated DDR unit and the seconded personnel; \\n Project support units: Core UN agency staff seconded to the integrated DDR unit may be complemented by additional project support staff located in project support units (PSUs) in order to provide capacity (programme, monitoring, operations, finance) for implementing key elements of UN assistance within the national planning and pro\u00ad gramme framework for DDR. The PSU will also be responsible for ensuring links and coordination with other agency programme areas (particularly in rule of law and security sector reform). Additional PSUs managed by other UN agencies can also be established, depending on the implementation\/operational role attributed to them; \\n Links with other parts of the peacekeeping mission: The integrated DDR unit shall be closely linked with other parts of the peacekeeping mission, in particular the military and the police, to ensure a \u2018joined\u00adup\u2019 approach to the DDR programme.", + "Paragraph": "DPKO and UNDP are in the process of developing an MoU on the establishment of an integrated DDR unit in a peacekeeping mission. For the time being, the following principles shall guide the establishment of the integrated DDR unit: \n Joint management of the DDR unit: The chief of the DDR unit shall come from the peace\u00ad keeping mission. His\/Her post shall be funded from the peacekeeping assessed budget. The deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit shall be seconded from UNDP, although the peacekeeping mission will provide him\/her with administrative and logistic support for him\/her to perform his\/her function as deputy chief of the DDR unit. Such integration allows the DDR unit to use the particular skills of both the mission and the country office, maximizing existing local knowledge and ensuring a smooth transition on DDR\u00adrelated issues when the mandate of the peacekeeping mission ends; \n Administrative and finance cell from UNDP: UNDP shall second a small administrative and finance cell from its country office to support the programme delivery aspects of the DDR component. The principles of secondment use for the deputy chief of the DDR unit shall apply; \n Secondment of staff from other UN entities: In order to maximize coherence and coordina\u00ad tion on DDR between missions and UN agencies, staff members from other agencies may be seconded to specific posts in the integrated DDR unit. Use of this method ensures the active engagement and participation of UN agencies in strategic policy decisions and coordination of UN DDR activities (including both mission operational support and programme implementation). The integration and co\u00adlocation of UN agency staff in this structure are essential, given the complex and highly operational nature of DDR. Decisions on secondment shall be made at the earliest stages of planning to ensure that the proper budgetary support is secure to support the integrated DDR unit and the seconded personnel; \n Project support units: Core UN agency staff seconded to the integrated DDR unit may be complemented by additional project support staff located in project support units (PSUs) in order to provide capacity (programme, monitoring, operations, finance) for implementing key elements of UN assistance within the national planning and pro\u00ad gramme framework for DDR. The PSU will also be responsible for ensuring links and coordination with other agency programme areas (particularly in rule of law and security sector reform). Additional PSUs managed by other UN agencies can also be established, depending on the implementation\/operational role attributed to them; \n Links with other parts of the peacekeeping mission: The integrated DDR unit shall be closely linked with other parts of the peacekeeping mission, in particular the military and the police, to ensure a \u2018joined\u00adup\u2019 approach to the DDR programme.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59682,14 +59682,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Principles of integration .", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Such integration allows the DDR unit to use the particular skills of both the mission and the country office, maximizing existing local knowledge and ensuring a smooth transition on DDR\u00adrelated issues when the mandate of the peacekeeping mission ends; \\n Administrative and finance cell from UNDP: UNDP shall second a small administrative and finance cell from its country office to support the programme delivery aspects of the DDR component.", + "Sentence": "Such integration allows the DDR unit to use the particular skills of both the mission and the country office, maximizing existing local knowledge and ensuring a smooth transition on DDR\u00adrelated issues when the mandate of the peacekeeping mission ends; \n Administrative and finance cell from UNDP: UNDP shall second a small administrative and finance cell from its country office to support the programme delivery aspects of the DDR component.", "newParagraph": "dpko undp process developing mou establishment integrated ddr unit peacekeeping mission time following principle shall guide establishment integrated ddr unit n joint management ddr unit chief ddr unit shall come peace keeping mission hisher post shall funded peacekeeping assessed budget deputy chief integrated ddr unit shall seconded undp although peacekeeping mission provide himher administrative logistic support himher perform hisher function deputy chief ddr unit integration allows ddr unit use particular skill mission country office maximizing existing local knowledge ensuring smooth transition ddr related issue mandate peacekeeping mission end n administrative finance cell undp undp shall second small administrative finance cell country office support programme delivery aspect ddr component principle secondment use deputy chief ddr unit shall apply n secondment staff un entity order maximize coherence coordina tion ddr mission un agency staff member agency may seconded specific post integrated ddr unit use method ensures active engagement participation un agency strategic policy decision coordination un ddr activity including mission operational support programme implementation integration co location un agency staff structure essential given complex highly operational nature ddr decision secondment shall made earliest stage planning ensure proper budgetary support secure support integrated ddr unit seconded personnel n project support unit core un agency staff seconded integrated ddr unit may complemented additional project support staff located project support unit psus order provide capacity programme monitoring operation finance implementing key element un assistance within national planning pro gramme framework ddr psu also responsible ensuring link coordination agency programme area particularly rule law security sector reform additional psus managed un agency also established depending implementationoperational role attributed n link part peacekeeping mission integrated ddr unit shall closely linked part peacekeeping mission particular military police ensure joined approach ddr programme", "ProcessedSent": "integration allows ddr unit use particular skill mission country office maximizing existing local knowledge ensuring smooth transition ddr related issue mandate peacekeeping mission end n administrative finance cell undp undp shall second small administrative finance cell country office support programme delivery aspect ddr component", "SentID": 3315 }, { "ParagraphID": 1099, - "Paragraph": "DPKO and UNDP are in the process of developing an MoU on the establishment of an integrated DDR unit in a peacekeeping mission. For the time being, the following principles shall guide the establishment of the integrated DDR unit: \\n Joint management of the DDR unit: The chief of the DDR unit shall come from the peace\u00ad keeping mission. His\/Her post shall be funded from the peacekeeping assessed budget. The deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit shall be seconded from UNDP, although the peacekeeping mission will provide him\/her with administrative and logistic support for him\/her to perform his\/her function as deputy chief of the DDR unit. Such integration allows the DDR unit to use the particular skills of both the mission and the country office, maximizing existing local knowledge and ensuring a smooth transition on DDR\u00adrelated issues when the mandate of the peacekeeping mission ends; \\n Administrative and finance cell from UNDP: UNDP shall second a small administrative and finance cell from its country office to support the programme delivery aspects of the DDR component. The principles of secondment use for the deputy chief of the DDR unit shall apply; \\n Secondment of staff from other UN entities: In order to maximize coherence and coordina\u00ad tion on DDR between missions and UN agencies, staff members from other agencies may be seconded to specific posts in the integrated DDR unit. Use of this method ensures the active engagement and participation of UN agencies in strategic policy decisions and coordination of UN DDR activities (including both mission operational support and programme implementation). The integration and co\u00adlocation of UN agency staff in this structure are essential, given the complex and highly operational nature of DDR. Decisions on secondment shall be made at the earliest stages of planning to ensure that the proper budgetary support is secure to support the integrated DDR unit and the seconded personnel; \\n Project support units: Core UN agency staff seconded to the integrated DDR unit may be complemented by additional project support staff located in project support units (PSUs) in order to provide capacity (programme, monitoring, operations, finance) for implementing key elements of UN assistance within the national planning and pro\u00ad gramme framework for DDR. The PSU will also be responsible for ensuring links and coordination with other agency programme areas (particularly in rule of law and security sector reform). Additional PSUs managed by other UN agencies can also be established, depending on the implementation\/operational role attributed to them; \\n Links with other parts of the peacekeeping mission: The integrated DDR unit shall be closely linked with other parts of the peacekeeping mission, in particular the military and the police, to ensure a \u2018joined\u00adup\u2019 approach to the DDR programme.", + "Paragraph": "DPKO and UNDP are in the process of developing an MoU on the establishment of an integrated DDR unit in a peacekeeping mission. For the time being, the following principles shall guide the establishment of the integrated DDR unit: \n Joint management of the DDR unit: The chief of the DDR unit shall come from the peace\u00ad keeping mission. His\/Her post shall be funded from the peacekeeping assessed budget. The deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit shall be seconded from UNDP, although the peacekeeping mission will provide him\/her with administrative and logistic support for him\/her to perform his\/her function as deputy chief of the DDR unit. Such integration allows the DDR unit to use the particular skills of both the mission and the country office, maximizing existing local knowledge and ensuring a smooth transition on DDR\u00adrelated issues when the mandate of the peacekeeping mission ends; \n Administrative and finance cell from UNDP: UNDP shall second a small administrative and finance cell from its country office to support the programme delivery aspects of the DDR component. The principles of secondment use for the deputy chief of the DDR unit shall apply; \n Secondment of staff from other UN entities: In order to maximize coherence and coordina\u00ad tion on DDR between missions and UN agencies, staff members from other agencies may be seconded to specific posts in the integrated DDR unit. Use of this method ensures the active engagement and participation of UN agencies in strategic policy decisions and coordination of UN DDR activities (including both mission operational support and programme implementation). The integration and co\u00adlocation of UN agency staff in this structure are essential, given the complex and highly operational nature of DDR. Decisions on secondment shall be made at the earliest stages of planning to ensure that the proper budgetary support is secure to support the integrated DDR unit and the seconded personnel; \n Project support units: Core UN agency staff seconded to the integrated DDR unit may be complemented by additional project support staff located in project support units (PSUs) in order to provide capacity (programme, monitoring, operations, finance) for implementing key elements of UN assistance within the national planning and pro\u00ad gramme framework for DDR. The PSU will also be responsible for ensuring links and coordination with other agency programme areas (particularly in rule of law and security sector reform). Additional PSUs managed by other UN agencies can also be established, depending on the implementation\/operational role attributed to them; \n Links with other parts of the peacekeeping mission: The integrated DDR unit shall be closely linked with other parts of the peacekeeping mission, in particular the military and the police, to ensure a \u2018joined\u00adup\u2019 approach to the DDR programme.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59700,14 +59700,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Principles of integration .", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The principles of secondment use for the deputy chief of the DDR unit shall apply; \\n Secondment of staff from other UN entities: In order to maximize coherence and coordina\u00ad tion on DDR between missions and UN agencies, staff members from other agencies may be seconded to specific posts in the integrated DDR unit.", + "Sentence": "The principles of secondment use for the deputy chief of the DDR unit shall apply; \n Secondment of staff from other UN entities: In order to maximize coherence and coordina\u00ad tion on DDR between missions and UN agencies, staff members from other agencies may be seconded to specific posts in the integrated DDR unit.", "newParagraph": "dpko undp process developing mou establishment integrated ddr unit peacekeeping mission time following principle shall guide establishment integrated ddr unit n joint management ddr unit chief ddr unit shall come peace keeping mission hisher post shall funded peacekeeping assessed budget deputy chief integrated ddr unit shall seconded undp although peacekeeping mission provide himher administrative logistic support himher perform hisher function deputy chief ddr unit integration allows ddr unit use particular skill mission country office maximizing existing local knowledge ensuring smooth transition ddr related issue mandate peacekeeping mission end n administrative finance cell undp undp shall second small administrative finance cell country office support programme delivery aspect ddr component principle secondment use deputy chief ddr unit shall apply n secondment staff un entity order maximize coherence coordina tion ddr mission un agency staff member agency may seconded specific post integrated ddr unit use method ensures active engagement participation un agency strategic policy decision coordination un ddr activity including mission operational support programme implementation integration co location un agency staff structure essential given complex highly operational nature ddr decision secondment shall made earliest stage planning ensure proper budgetary support secure support integrated ddr unit seconded personnel n project support unit core un agency staff seconded integrated ddr unit may complemented additional project support staff located project support unit psus order provide capacity programme monitoring operation finance implementing key element un assistance within national planning pro gramme framework ddr psu also responsible ensuring link coordination agency programme area particularly rule law security sector reform additional psus managed un agency also established depending implementationoperational role attributed n link part peacekeeping mission integrated ddr unit shall closely linked part peacekeeping mission particular military police ensure joined approach ddr programme", "ProcessedSent": "principle secondment use deputy chief ddr unit shall apply n secondment staff un entity order maximize coherence coordina tion ddr mission un agency staff member agency may seconded specific post integrated ddr unit", "SentID": 3316 }, { "ParagraphID": 1099, - "Paragraph": "DPKO and UNDP are in the process of developing an MoU on the establishment of an integrated DDR unit in a peacekeeping mission. For the time being, the following principles shall guide the establishment of the integrated DDR unit: \\n Joint management of the DDR unit: The chief of the DDR unit shall come from the peace\u00ad keeping mission. His\/Her post shall be funded from the peacekeeping assessed budget. The deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit shall be seconded from UNDP, although the peacekeeping mission will provide him\/her with administrative and logistic support for him\/her to perform his\/her function as deputy chief of the DDR unit. Such integration allows the DDR unit to use the particular skills of both the mission and the country office, maximizing existing local knowledge and ensuring a smooth transition on DDR\u00adrelated issues when the mandate of the peacekeeping mission ends; \\n Administrative and finance cell from UNDP: UNDP shall second a small administrative and finance cell from its country office to support the programme delivery aspects of the DDR component. The principles of secondment use for the deputy chief of the DDR unit shall apply; \\n Secondment of staff from other UN entities: In order to maximize coherence and coordina\u00ad tion on DDR between missions and UN agencies, staff members from other agencies may be seconded to specific posts in the integrated DDR unit. Use of this method ensures the active engagement and participation of UN agencies in strategic policy decisions and coordination of UN DDR activities (including both mission operational support and programme implementation). The integration and co\u00adlocation of UN agency staff in this structure are essential, given the complex and highly operational nature of DDR. Decisions on secondment shall be made at the earliest stages of planning to ensure that the proper budgetary support is secure to support the integrated DDR unit and the seconded personnel; \\n Project support units: Core UN agency staff seconded to the integrated DDR unit may be complemented by additional project support staff located in project support units (PSUs) in order to provide capacity (programme, monitoring, operations, finance) for implementing key elements of UN assistance within the national planning and pro\u00ad gramme framework for DDR. The PSU will also be responsible for ensuring links and coordination with other agency programme areas (particularly in rule of law and security sector reform). Additional PSUs managed by other UN agencies can also be established, depending on the implementation\/operational role attributed to them; \\n Links with other parts of the peacekeeping mission: The integrated DDR unit shall be closely linked with other parts of the peacekeeping mission, in particular the military and the police, to ensure a \u2018joined\u00adup\u2019 approach to the DDR programme.", + "Paragraph": "DPKO and UNDP are in the process of developing an MoU on the establishment of an integrated DDR unit in a peacekeeping mission. For the time being, the following principles shall guide the establishment of the integrated DDR unit: \n Joint management of the DDR unit: The chief of the DDR unit shall come from the peace\u00ad keeping mission. His\/Her post shall be funded from the peacekeeping assessed budget. The deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit shall be seconded from UNDP, although the peacekeeping mission will provide him\/her with administrative and logistic support for him\/her to perform his\/her function as deputy chief of the DDR unit. Such integration allows the DDR unit to use the particular skills of both the mission and the country office, maximizing existing local knowledge and ensuring a smooth transition on DDR\u00adrelated issues when the mandate of the peacekeeping mission ends; \n Administrative and finance cell from UNDP: UNDP shall second a small administrative and finance cell from its country office to support the programme delivery aspects of the DDR component. The principles of secondment use for the deputy chief of the DDR unit shall apply; \n Secondment of staff from other UN entities: In order to maximize coherence and coordina\u00ad tion on DDR between missions and UN agencies, staff members from other agencies may be seconded to specific posts in the integrated DDR unit. Use of this method ensures the active engagement and participation of UN agencies in strategic policy decisions and coordination of UN DDR activities (including both mission operational support and programme implementation). The integration and co\u00adlocation of UN agency staff in this structure are essential, given the complex and highly operational nature of DDR. Decisions on secondment shall be made at the earliest stages of planning to ensure that the proper budgetary support is secure to support the integrated DDR unit and the seconded personnel; \n Project support units: Core UN agency staff seconded to the integrated DDR unit may be complemented by additional project support staff located in project support units (PSUs) in order to provide capacity (programme, monitoring, operations, finance) for implementing key elements of UN assistance within the national planning and pro\u00ad gramme framework for DDR. The PSU will also be responsible for ensuring links and coordination with other agency programme areas (particularly in rule of law and security sector reform). Additional PSUs managed by other UN agencies can also be established, depending on the implementation\/operational role attributed to them; \n Links with other parts of the peacekeeping mission: The integrated DDR unit shall be closely linked with other parts of the peacekeeping mission, in particular the military and the police, to ensure a \u2018joined\u00adup\u2019 approach to the DDR programme.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59725,7 +59725,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1099, - "Paragraph": "DPKO and UNDP are in the process of developing an MoU on the establishment of an integrated DDR unit in a peacekeeping mission. For the time being, the following principles shall guide the establishment of the integrated DDR unit: \\n Joint management of the DDR unit: The chief of the DDR unit shall come from the peace\u00ad keeping mission. His\/Her post shall be funded from the peacekeeping assessed budget. The deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit shall be seconded from UNDP, although the peacekeeping mission will provide him\/her with administrative and logistic support for him\/her to perform his\/her function as deputy chief of the DDR unit. Such integration allows the DDR unit to use the particular skills of both the mission and the country office, maximizing existing local knowledge and ensuring a smooth transition on DDR\u00adrelated issues when the mandate of the peacekeeping mission ends; \\n Administrative and finance cell from UNDP: UNDP shall second a small administrative and finance cell from its country office to support the programme delivery aspects of the DDR component. The principles of secondment use for the deputy chief of the DDR unit shall apply; \\n Secondment of staff from other UN entities: In order to maximize coherence and coordina\u00ad tion on DDR between missions and UN agencies, staff members from other agencies may be seconded to specific posts in the integrated DDR unit. Use of this method ensures the active engagement and participation of UN agencies in strategic policy decisions and coordination of UN DDR activities (including both mission operational support and programme implementation). The integration and co\u00adlocation of UN agency staff in this structure are essential, given the complex and highly operational nature of DDR. Decisions on secondment shall be made at the earliest stages of planning to ensure that the proper budgetary support is secure to support the integrated DDR unit and the seconded personnel; \\n Project support units: Core UN agency staff seconded to the integrated DDR unit may be complemented by additional project support staff located in project support units (PSUs) in order to provide capacity (programme, monitoring, operations, finance) for implementing key elements of UN assistance within the national planning and pro\u00ad gramme framework for DDR. The PSU will also be responsible for ensuring links and coordination with other agency programme areas (particularly in rule of law and security sector reform). Additional PSUs managed by other UN agencies can also be established, depending on the implementation\/operational role attributed to them; \\n Links with other parts of the peacekeeping mission: The integrated DDR unit shall be closely linked with other parts of the peacekeeping mission, in particular the military and the police, to ensure a \u2018joined\u00adup\u2019 approach to the DDR programme.", + "Paragraph": "DPKO and UNDP are in the process of developing an MoU on the establishment of an integrated DDR unit in a peacekeeping mission. For the time being, the following principles shall guide the establishment of the integrated DDR unit: \n Joint management of the DDR unit: The chief of the DDR unit shall come from the peace\u00ad keeping mission. His\/Her post shall be funded from the peacekeeping assessed budget. The deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit shall be seconded from UNDP, although the peacekeeping mission will provide him\/her with administrative and logistic support for him\/her to perform his\/her function as deputy chief of the DDR unit. Such integration allows the DDR unit to use the particular skills of both the mission and the country office, maximizing existing local knowledge and ensuring a smooth transition on DDR\u00adrelated issues when the mandate of the peacekeeping mission ends; \n Administrative and finance cell from UNDP: UNDP shall second a small administrative and finance cell from its country office to support the programme delivery aspects of the DDR component. The principles of secondment use for the deputy chief of the DDR unit shall apply; \n Secondment of staff from other UN entities: In order to maximize coherence and coordina\u00ad tion on DDR between missions and UN agencies, staff members from other agencies may be seconded to specific posts in the integrated DDR unit. Use of this method ensures the active engagement and participation of UN agencies in strategic policy decisions and coordination of UN DDR activities (including both mission operational support and programme implementation). The integration and co\u00adlocation of UN agency staff in this structure are essential, given the complex and highly operational nature of DDR. Decisions on secondment shall be made at the earliest stages of planning to ensure that the proper budgetary support is secure to support the integrated DDR unit and the seconded personnel; \n Project support units: Core UN agency staff seconded to the integrated DDR unit may be complemented by additional project support staff located in project support units (PSUs) in order to provide capacity (programme, monitoring, operations, finance) for implementing key elements of UN assistance within the national planning and pro\u00ad gramme framework for DDR. The PSU will also be responsible for ensuring links and coordination with other agency programme areas (particularly in rule of law and security sector reform). Additional PSUs managed by other UN agencies can also be established, depending on the implementation\/operational role attributed to them; \n Links with other parts of the peacekeeping mission: The integrated DDR unit shall be closely linked with other parts of the peacekeeping mission, in particular the military and the police, to ensure a \u2018joined\u00adup\u2019 approach to the DDR programme.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59743,7 +59743,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1099, - "Paragraph": "DPKO and UNDP are in the process of developing an MoU on the establishment of an integrated DDR unit in a peacekeeping mission. For the time being, the following principles shall guide the establishment of the integrated DDR unit: \\n Joint management of the DDR unit: The chief of the DDR unit shall come from the peace\u00ad keeping mission. His\/Her post shall be funded from the peacekeeping assessed budget. The deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit shall be seconded from UNDP, although the peacekeeping mission will provide him\/her with administrative and logistic support for him\/her to perform his\/her function as deputy chief of the DDR unit. Such integration allows the DDR unit to use the particular skills of both the mission and the country office, maximizing existing local knowledge and ensuring a smooth transition on DDR\u00adrelated issues when the mandate of the peacekeeping mission ends; \\n Administrative and finance cell from UNDP: UNDP shall second a small administrative and finance cell from its country office to support the programme delivery aspects of the DDR component. The principles of secondment use for the deputy chief of the DDR unit shall apply; \\n Secondment of staff from other UN entities: In order to maximize coherence and coordina\u00ad tion on DDR between missions and UN agencies, staff members from other agencies may be seconded to specific posts in the integrated DDR unit. Use of this method ensures the active engagement and participation of UN agencies in strategic policy decisions and coordination of UN DDR activities (including both mission operational support and programme implementation). The integration and co\u00adlocation of UN agency staff in this structure are essential, given the complex and highly operational nature of DDR. Decisions on secondment shall be made at the earliest stages of planning to ensure that the proper budgetary support is secure to support the integrated DDR unit and the seconded personnel; \\n Project support units: Core UN agency staff seconded to the integrated DDR unit may be complemented by additional project support staff located in project support units (PSUs) in order to provide capacity (programme, monitoring, operations, finance) for implementing key elements of UN assistance within the national planning and pro\u00ad gramme framework for DDR. The PSU will also be responsible for ensuring links and coordination with other agency programme areas (particularly in rule of law and security sector reform). Additional PSUs managed by other UN agencies can also be established, depending on the implementation\/operational role attributed to them; \\n Links with other parts of the peacekeeping mission: The integrated DDR unit shall be closely linked with other parts of the peacekeeping mission, in particular the military and the police, to ensure a \u2018joined\u00adup\u2019 approach to the DDR programme.", + "Paragraph": "DPKO and UNDP are in the process of developing an MoU on the establishment of an integrated DDR unit in a peacekeeping mission. For the time being, the following principles shall guide the establishment of the integrated DDR unit: \n Joint management of the DDR unit: The chief of the DDR unit shall come from the peace\u00ad keeping mission. His\/Her post shall be funded from the peacekeeping assessed budget. The deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit shall be seconded from UNDP, although the peacekeeping mission will provide him\/her with administrative and logistic support for him\/her to perform his\/her function as deputy chief of the DDR unit. Such integration allows the DDR unit to use the particular skills of both the mission and the country office, maximizing existing local knowledge and ensuring a smooth transition on DDR\u00adrelated issues when the mandate of the peacekeeping mission ends; \n Administrative and finance cell from UNDP: UNDP shall second a small administrative and finance cell from its country office to support the programme delivery aspects of the DDR component. The principles of secondment use for the deputy chief of the DDR unit shall apply; \n Secondment of staff from other UN entities: In order to maximize coherence and coordina\u00ad tion on DDR between missions and UN agencies, staff members from other agencies may be seconded to specific posts in the integrated DDR unit. Use of this method ensures the active engagement and participation of UN agencies in strategic policy decisions and coordination of UN DDR activities (including both mission operational support and programme implementation). The integration and co\u00adlocation of UN agency staff in this structure are essential, given the complex and highly operational nature of DDR. Decisions on secondment shall be made at the earliest stages of planning to ensure that the proper budgetary support is secure to support the integrated DDR unit and the seconded personnel; \n Project support units: Core UN agency staff seconded to the integrated DDR unit may be complemented by additional project support staff located in project support units (PSUs) in order to provide capacity (programme, monitoring, operations, finance) for implementing key elements of UN assistance within the national planning and pro\u00ad gramme framework for DDR. The PSU will also be responsible for ensuring links and coordination with other agency programme areas (particularly in rule of law and security sector reform). Additional PSUs managed by other UN agencies can also be established, depending on the implementation\/operational role attributed to them; \n Links with other parts of the peacekeeping mission: The integrated DDR unit shall be closely linked with other parts of the peacekeeping mission, in particular the military and the police, to ensure a \u2018joined\u00adup\u2019 approach to the DDR programme.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59754,14 +59754,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Principles of integration .", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Decisions on secondment shall be made at the earliest stages of planning to ensure that the proper budgetary support is secure to support the integrated DDR unit and the seconded personnel; \\n Project support units: Core UN agency staff seconded to the integrated DDR unit may be complemented by additional project support staff located in project support units (PSUs) in order to provide capacity (programme, monitoring, operations, finance) for implementing key elements of UN assistance within the national planning and pro\u00ad gramme framework for DDR.", + "Sentence": "Decisions on secondment shall be made at the earliest stages of planning to ensure that the proper budgetary support is secure to support the integrated DDR unit and the seconded personnel; \n Project support units: Core UN agency staff seconded to the integrated DDR unit may be complemented by additional project support staff located in project support units (PSUs) in order to provide capacity (programme, monitoring, operations, finance) for implementing key elements of UN assistance within the national planning and pro\u00ad gramme framework for DDR.", "newParagraph": "dpko undp process developing mou establishment integrated ddr unit peacekeeping mission time following principle shall guide establishment integrated ddr unit n joint management ddr unit chief ddr unit shall come peace keeping mission hisher post shall funded peacekeeping assessed budget deputy chief integrated ddr unit shall seconded undp although peacekeeping mission provide himher administrative logistic support himher perform hisher function deputy chief ddr unit integration allows ddr unit use particular skill mission country office maximizing existing local knowledge ensuring smooth transition ddr related issue mandate peacekeeping mission end n administrative finance cell undp undp shall second small administrative finance cell country office support programme delivery aspect ddr component principle secondment use deputy chief ddr unit shall apply n secondment staff un entity order maximize coherence coordina tion ddr mission un agency staff member agency may seconded specific post integrated ddr unit use method ensures active engagement participation un agency strategic policy decision coordination un ddr activity including mission operational support programme implementation integration co location un agency staff structure essential given complex highly operational nature ddr decision secondment shall made earliest stage planning ensure proper budgetary support secure support integrated ddr unit seconded personnel n project support unit core un agency staff seconded integrated ddr unit may complemented additional project support staff located project support unit psus order provide capacity programme monitoring operation finance implementing key element un assistance within national planning pro gramme framework ddr psu also responsible ensuring link coordination agency programme area particularly rule law security sector reform additional psus managed un agency also established depending implementationoperational role attributed n link part peacekeeping mission integrated ddr unit shall closely linked part peacekeeping mission particular military police ensure joined approach ddr programme", "ProcessedSent": "decision secondment shall made earliest stage planning ensure proper budgetary support secure support integrated ddr unit seconded personnel n project support unit core un agency staff seconded integrated ddr unit may complemented additional project support staff located project support unit psus order provide capacity programme monitoring operation finance implementing key element un assistance within national planning pro gramme framework ddr", "SentID": 3319 }, { "ParagraphID": 1099, - "Paragraph": "DPKO and UNDP are in the process of developing an MoU on the establishment of an integrated DDR unit in a peacekeeping mission. For the time being, the following principles shall guide the establishment of the integrated DDR unit: \\n Joint management of the DDR unit: The chief of the DDR unit shall come from the peace\u00ad keeping mission. His\/Her post shall be funded from the peacekeeping assessed budget. The deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit shall be seconded from UNDP, although the peacekeeping mission will provide him\/her with administrative and logistic support for him\/her to perform his\/her function as deputy chief of the DDR unit. Such integration allows the DDR unit to use the particular skills of both the mission and the country office, maximizing existing local knowledge and ensuring a smooth transition on DDR\u00adrelated issues when the mandate of the peacekeeping mission ends; \\n Administrative and finance cell from UNDP: UNDP shall second a small administrative and finance cell from its country office to support the programme delivery aspects of the DDR component. The principles of secondment use for the deputy chief of the DDR unit shall apply; \\n Secondment of staff from other UN entities: In order to maximize coherence and coordina\u00ad tion on DDR between missions and UN agencies, staff members from other agencies may be seconded to specific posts in the integrated DDR unit. Use of this method ensures the active engagement and participation of UN agencies in strategic policy decisions and coordination of UN DDR activities (including both mission operational support and programme implementation). The integration and co\u00adlocation of UN agency staff in this structure are essential, given the complex and highly operational nature of DDR. Decisions on secondment shall be made at the earliest stages of planning to ensure that the proper budgetary support is secure to support the integrated DDR unit and the seconded personnel; \\n Project support units: Core UN agency staff seconded to the integrated DDR unit may be complemented by additional project support staff located in project support units (PSUs) in order to provide capacity (programme, monitoring, operations, finance) for implementing key elements of UN assistance within the national planning and pro\u00ad gramme framework for DDR. The PSU will also be responsible for ensuring links and coordination with other agency programme areas (particularly in rule of law and security sector reform). Additional PSUs managed by other UN agencies can also be established, depending on the implementation\/operational role attributed to them; \\n Links with other parts of the peacekeeping mission: The integrated DDR unit shall be closely linked with other parts of the peacekeeping mission, in particular the military and the police, to ensure a \u2018joined\u00adup\u2019 approach to the DDR programme.", + "Paragraph": "DPKO and UNDP are in the process of developing an MoU on the establishment of an integrated DDR unit in a peacekeeping mission. For the time being, the following principles shall guide the establishment of the integrated DDR unit: \n Joint management of the DDR unit: The chief of the DDR unit shall come from the peace\u00ad keeping mission. His\/Her post shall be funded from the peacekeeping assessed budget. The deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit shall be seconded from UNDP, although the peacekeeping mission will provide him\/her with administrative and logistic support for him\/her to perform his\/her function as deputy chief of the DDR unit. Such integration allows the DDR unit to use the particular skills of both the mission and the country office, maximizing existing local knowledge and ensuring a smooth transition on DDR\u00adrelated issues when the mandate of the peacekeeping mission ends; \n Administrative and finance cell from UNDP: UNDP shall second a small administrative and finance cell from its country office to support the programme delivery aspects of the DDR component. The principles of secondment use for the deputy chief of the DDR unit shall apply; \n Secondment of staff from other UN entities: In order to maximize coherence and coordina\u00ad tion on DDR between missions and UN agencies, staff members from other agencies may be seconded to specific posts in the integrated DDR unit. Use of this method ensures the active engagement and participation of UN agencies in strategic policy decisions and coordination of UN DDR activities (including both mission operational support and programme implementation). The integration and co\u00adlocation of UN agency staff in this structure are essential, given the complex and highly operational nature of DDR. Decisions on secondment shall be made at the earliest stages of planning to ensure that the proper budgetary support is secure to support the integrated DDR unit and the seconded personnel; \n Project support units: Core UN agency staff seconded to the integrated DDR unit may be complemented by additional project support staff located in project support units (PSUs) in order to provide capacity (programme, monitoring, operations, finance) for implementing key elements of UN assistance within the national planning and pro\u00ad gramme framework for DDR. The PSU will also be responsible for ensuring links and coordination with other agency programme areas (particularly in rule of law and security sector reform). Additional PSUs managed by other UN agencies can also be established, depending on the implementation\/operational role attributed to them; \n Links with other parts of the peacekeeping mission: The integrated DDR unit shall be closely linked with other parts of the peacekeeping mission, in particular the military and the police, to ensure a \u2018joined\u00adup\u2019 approach to the DDR programme.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59779,7 +59779,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1099, - "Paragraph": "DPKO and UNDP are in the process of developing an MoU on the establishment of an integrated DDR unit in a peacekeeping mission. For the time being, the following principles shall guide the establishment of the integrated DDR unit: \\n Joint management of the DDR unit: The chief of the DDR unit shall come from the peace\u00ad keeping mission. His\/Her post shall be funded from the peacekeeping assessed budget. The deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit shall be seconded from UNDP, although the peacekeeping mission will provide him\/her with administrative and logistic support for him\/her to perform his\/her function as deputy chief of the DDR unit. Such integration allows the DDR unit to use the particular skills of both the mission and the country office, maximizing existing local knowledge and ensuring a smooth transition on DDR\u00adrelated issues when the mandate of the peacekeeping mission ends; \\n Administrative and finance cell from UNDP: UNDP shall second a small administrative and finance cell from its country office to support the programme delivery aspects of the DDR component. The principles of secondment use for the deputy chief of the DDR unit shall apply; \\n Secondment of staff from other UN entities: In order to maximize coherence and coordina\u00ad tion on DDR between missions and UN agencies, staff members from other agencies may be seconded to specific posts in the integrated DDR unit. Use of this method ensures the active engagement and participation of UN agencies in strategic policy decisions and coordination of UN DDR activities (including both mission operational support and programme implementation). The integration and co\u00adlocation of UN agency staff in this structure are essential, given the complex and highly operational nature of DDR. Decisions on secondment shall be made at the earliest stages of planning to ensure that the proper budgetary support is secure to support the integrated DDR unit and the seconded personnel; \\n Project support units: Core UN agency staff seconded to the integrated DDR unit may be complemented by additional project support staff located in project support units (PSUs) in order to provide capacity (programme, monitoring, operations, finance) for implementing key elements of UN assistance within the national planning and pro\u00ad gramme framework for DDR. The PSU will also be responsible for ensuring links and coordination with other agency programme areas (particularly in rule of law and security sector reform). Additional PSUs managed by other UN agencies can also be established, depending on the implementation\/operational role attributed to them; \\n Links with other parts of the peacekeeping mission: The integrated DDR unit shall be closely linked with other parts of the peacekeeping mission, in particular the military and the police, to ensure a \u2018joined\u00adup\u2019 approach to the DDR programme.", + "Paragraph": "DPKO and UNDP are in the process of developing an MoU on the establishment of an integrated DDR unit in a peacekeeping mission. For the time being, the following principles shall guide the establishment of the integrated DDR unit: \n Joint management of the DDR unit: The chief of the DDR unit shall come from the peace\u00ad keeping mission. His\/Her post shall be funded from the peacekeeping assessed budget. The deputy chief of the integrated DDR unit shall be seconded from UNDP, although the peacekeeping mission will provide him\/her with administrative and logistic support for him\/her to perform his\/her function as deputy chief of the DDR unit. Such integration allows the DDR unit to use the particular skills of both the mission and the country office, maximizing existing local knowledge and ensuring a smooth transition on DDR\u00adrelated issues when the mandate of the peacekeeping mission ends; \n Administrative and finance cell from UNDP: UNDP shall second a small administrative and finance cell from its country office to support the programme delivery aspects of the DDR component. The principles of secondment use for the deputy chief of the DDR unit shall apply; \n Secondment of staff from other UN entities: In order to maximize coherence and coordina\u00ad tion on DDR between missions and UN agencies, staff members from other agencies may be seconded to specific posts in the integrated DDR unit. Use of this method ensures the active engagement and participation of UN agencies in strategic policy decisions and coordination of UN DDR activities (including both mission operational support and programme implementation). The integration and co\u00adlocation of UN agency staff in this structure are essential, given the complex and highly operational nature of DDR. Decisions on secondment shall be made at the earliest stages of planning to ensure that the proper budgetary support is secure to support the integrated DDR unit and the seconded personnel; \n Project support units: Core UN agency staff seconded to the integrated DDR unit may be complemented by additional project support staff located in project support units (PSUs) in order to provide capacity (programme, monitoring, operations, finance) for implementing key elements of UN assistance within the national planning and pro\u00ad gramme framework for DDR. The PSU will also be responsible for ensuring links and coordination with other agency programme areas (particularly in rule of law and security sector reform). Additional PSUs managed by other UN agencies can also be established, depending on the implementation\/operational role attributed to them; \n Links with other parts of the peacekeeping mission: The integrated DDR unit shall be closely linked with other parts of the peacekeeping mission, in particular the military and the police, to ensure a \u2018joined\u00adup\u2019 approach to the DDR programme.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59790,7 +59790,7 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Principles of integration .", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Additional PSUs managed by other UN agencies can also be established, depending on the implementation\/operational role attributed to them; \\n Links with other parts of the peacekeeping mission: The integrated DDR unit shall be closely linked with other parts of the peacekeeping mission, in particular the military and the police, to ensure a \u2018joined\u00adup\u2019 approach to the DDR programme.", + "Sentence": "Additional PSUs managed by other UN agencies can also be established, depending on the implementation\/operational role attributed to them; \n Links with other parts of the peacekeeping mission: The integrated DDR unit shall be closely linked with other parts of the peacekeeping mission, in particular the military and the police, to ensure a \u2018joined\u00adup\u2019 approach to the DDR programme.", "newParagraph": "dpko undp process developing mou establishment integrated ddr unit peacekeeping mission time following principle shall guide establishment integrated ddr unit n joint management ddr unit chief ddr unit shall come peace keeping mission hisher post shall funded peacekeeping assessed budget deputy chief integrated ddr unit shall seconded undp although peacekeeping mission provide himher administrative logistic support himher perform hisher function deputy chief ddr unit integration allows ddr unit use particular skill mission country office maximizing existing local knowledge ensuring smooth transition ddr related issue mandate peacekeeping mission end n administrative finance cell undp undp shall second small administrative finance cell country office support programme delivery aspect ddr component principle secondment use deputy chief ddr unit shall apply n secondment staff un entity order maximize coherence coordina tion ddr mission un agency staff member agency may seconded specific post integrated ddr unit use method ensures active engagement participation un agency strategic policy decision coordination un ddr activity including mission operational support programme implementation integration co location un agency staff structure essential given complex highly operational nature ddr decision secondment shall made earliest stage planning ensure proper budgetary support secure support integrated ddr unit seconded personnel n project support unit core un agency staff seconded integrated ddr unit may complemented additional project support staff located project support unit psus order provide capacity programme monitoring operation finance implementing key element un assistance within national planning pro gramme framework ddr psu also responsible ensuring link coordination agency programme area particularly rule law security sector reform additional psus managed un agency also established depending implementationoperational role attributed n link part peacekeeping mission integrated ddr unit shall closely linked part peacekeeping mission particular military police ensure joined approach ddr programme", "ProcessedSent": "additional psus managed un agency also established depending implementationoperational role attributed n link part peacekeeping mission integrated ddr unit shall closely linked part peacekeeping mission particular military police ensure joined approach ddr programme", "SentID": 3321 @@ -59869,7 +59869,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1103, - "Paragraph": "Given the breadth and scope of DDR activities, staff members may come from a number of sources such as: \\n peacekeeping missions; \\n UN agencies, funds and programmes; UN Headquarters; \\n UN volunteer system; \\n other international organizations (World Bank, European Union, Organization for Secu\u00ad rity and Co\u00adoperation in Europe, etc.); \\n local and international NGOs; \\n the private sector.", + "Paragraph": "Given the breadth and scope of DDR activities, staff members may come from a number of sources such as: \n peacekeeping missions; \n UN agencies, funds and programmes; UN Headquarters; \n UN volunteer system; \n other international organizations (World Bank, European Union, Organization for Secu\u00ad rity and Co\u00adoperation in Europe, etc.); \n local and international NGOs; \n the private sector.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59880,14 +59880,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Given the breadth and scope of DDR activities, staff members may come from a number of sources such as: \\n peacekeeping missions; \\n UN agencies, funds and programmes; UN Headquarters; \\n UN volunteer system; \\n other international organizations (World Bank, European Union, Organization for Secu\u00ad rity and Co\u00adoperation in Europe, etc.", + "Sentence": "Given the breadth and scope of DDR activities, staff members may come from a number of sources such as: \n peacekeeping missions; \n UN agencies, funds and programmes; UN Headquarters; \n UN volunteer system; \n other international organizations (World Bank, European Union, Organization for Secu\u00ad rity and Co\u00adoperation in Europe, etc.", "newParagraph": "given breadth scope ddr activity staff member may come number source n peacekeeping mission n un agency fund programme un headquarters n un volunteer system n international organization world bank european union organization secu rity co operation europe etc n local international ngo n private sector", "ProcessedSent": "given breadth scope ddr activity staff member may come number source n peacekeeping mission n un agency fund programme un headquarters n un volunteer system n international organization world bank european union organization secu rity co operation europe etc", "SentID": 3326 }, { "ParagraphID": 1103, - "Paragraph": "Given the breadth and scope of DDR activities, staff members may come from a number of sources such as: \\n peacekeeping missions; \\n UN agencies, funds and programmes; UN Headquarters; \\n UN volunteer system; \\n other international organizations (World Bank, European Union, Organization for Secu\u00ad rity and Co\u00adoperation in Europe, etc.); \\n local and international NGOs; \\n the private sector.", + "Paragraph": "Given the breadth and scope of DDR activities, staff members may come from a number of sources such as: \n peacekeeping missions; \n UN agencies, funds and programmes; UN Headquarters; \n UN volunteer system; \n other international organizations (World Bank, European Union, Organization for Secu\u00ad rity and Co\u00adoperation in Europe, etc.); \n local and international NGOs; \n the private sector.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59898,7 +59898,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "); \\n local and international NGOs; \\n the private sector.", + "Sentence": "); \n local and international NGOs; \n the private sector.", "newParagraph": "given breadth scope ddr activity staff member may come number source n peacekeeping mission n un agency fund programme un headquarters n un volunteer system n international organization world bank european union organization secu rity co operation europe etc n local international ngo n private sector", "ProcessedSent": " n local international ngo n private sector", "SentID": 3327 @@ -59923,7 +59923,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1105, - "Paragraph": "The typical recruitment process for a staff member in the mission is as follows: \\n candidate applies on line to a generic vacancy announcement in the Galaxy system (http:\/\/www.jobs.un.org); \\n PMSS screens applications to select candidates who meet all the requirements of the post, and includes them in a roster of candidates for that occupational group\/level; \\n mission chief civilian personnel officer identifies the vacancy and requests recruitment action from PMSS; \\n PMSS makes available to the mission rosters of pre\u00adscreened and technically cleared candidates; \\n mission programme manager interviews candidates and recommends selection; \\n PMSS commences recruitment action (e.g., reference checks, offer of appointment, medical clearance, travel arrangements, etc.).", + "Paragraph": "The typical recruitment process for a staff member in the mission is as follows: \n candidate applies on line to a generic vacancy announcement in the Galaxy system (http:\/\/www.jobs.un.org); \n PMSS screens applications to select candidates who meet all the requirements of the post, and includes them in a roster of candidates for that occupational group\/level; \n mission chief civilian personnel officer identifies the vacancy and requests recruitment action from PMSS; \n PMSS makes available to the mission rosters of pre\u00adscreened and technically cleared candidates; \n mission programme manager interviews candidates and recommends selection; \n PMSS commences recruitment action (e.g., reference checks, offer of appointment, medical clearance, travel arrangements, etc.).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59934,14 +59934,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.2. Recruitment process .", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The typical recruitment process for a staff member in the mission is as follows: \\n candidate applies on line to a generic vacancy announcement in the Galaxy system (http:\/\/www.jobs.un.org); \\n PMSS screens applications to select candidates who meet all the requirements of the post, and includes them in a roster of candidates for that occupational group\/level; \\n mission chief civilian personnel officer identifies the vacancy and requests recruitment action from PMSS; \\n PMSS makes available to the mission rosters of pre\u00adscreened and technically cleared candidates; \\n mission programme manager interviews candidates and recommends selection; \\n PMSS commences recruitment action (e.g., reference checks, offer of appointment, medical clearance, travel arrangements, etc.", + "Sentence": "The typical recruitment process for a staff member in the mission is as follows: \n candidate applies on line to a generic vacancy announcement in the Galaxy system (http:\/\/www.jobs.un.org); \n PMSS screens applications to select candidates who meet all the requirements of the post, and includes them in a roster of candidates for that occupational group\/level; \n mission chief civilian personnel officer identifies the vacancy and requests recruitment action from PMSS; \n PMSS makes available to the mission rosters of pre\u00adscreened and technically cleared candidates; \n mission programme manager interviews candidates and recommends selection; \n PMSS commences recruitment action (e.g., reference checks, offer of appointment, medical clearance, travel arrangements, etc.", "newParagraph": "typical recruitment process staff member mission follows n candidate applies line generic vacancy announcement galaxy system httpwwwjobsunorg n pms screen application select candidate meet requirement post includes roster candidate occupational grouplevel n mission chief civilian personnel officer identifies vacancy request recruitment action pms n pms make available mission roster pre screened technically cleared candidate n mission programme manager interview candidate recommends selection n pms commences recruitment action eg reference check offer appointment medical clearance travel arrangement etc", "ProcessedSent": "typical recruitment process staff member mission follows n candidate applies line generic vacancy announcement galaxy system httpwwwjobsunorg n pms screen application select candidate meet requirement post includes roster candidate occupational grouplevel n mission chief civilian personnel officer identifies vacancy request recruitment action pms n pms make available mission roster pre screened technically cleared candidate n mission programme manager interview candidate recommends selection n pms commences recruitment action eg reference check offer appointment medical clearance travel arrangement etc", "SentID": 3329 }, { "ParagraphID": 1105, - "Paragraph": "The typical recruitment process for a staff member in the mission is as follows: \\n candidate applies on line to a generic vacancy announcement in the Galaxy system (http:\/\/www.jobs.un.org); \\n PMSS screens applications to select candidates who meet all the requirements of the post, and includes them in a roster of candidates for that occupational group\/level; \\n mission chief civilian personnel officer identifies the vacancy and requests recruitment action from PMSS; \\n PMSS makes available to the mission rosters of pre\u00adscreened and technically cleared candidates; \\n mission programme manager interviews candidates and recommends selection; \\n PMSS commences recruitment action (e.g., reference checks, offer of appointment, medical clearance, travel arrangements, etc.).", + "Paragraph": "The typical recruitment process for a staff member in the mission is as follows: \n candidate applies on line to a generic vacancy announcement in the Galaxy system (http:\/\/www.jobs.un.org); \n PMSS screens applications to select candidates who meet all the requirements of the post, and includes them in a roster of candidates for that occupational group\/level; \n mission chief civilian personnel officer identifies the vacancy and requests recruitment action from PMSS; \n PMSS makes available to the mission rosters of pre\u00adscreened and technically cleared candidates; \n mission programme manager interviews candidates and recommends selection; \n PMSS commences recruitment action (e.g., reference checks, offer of appointment, medical clearance, travel arrangements, etc.).", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59959,7 +59959,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1106, - "Paragraph": "Below is a list of appointments for which generic job descriptions are available; these can be found in the annexes as shown. \\n Chief, DDR Unit (Annex C.1) \\n Deputy Chief, DDR Unit (Annex C.2) \\n Senior Military DDR Officer (Annex C.3) \\n DDR Field Officer (Annex C.4) \\n DDR Field Officer (UNV) (Annex C.5) \\n DDR Programme Officer (UNV) (Annex C.6) \\n DDR Monitoring and Evaluation Officer (UNV) (Annex C.7) \\n DDR Officer (International) (Annex C.8) \\n Reintegration Officer (International) (Annex C.9) \\n DDR Field Coordination Officer (National) (Annex C.10) \\n Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer (Annex C.11) \\n DDR Gender Officer (Annex C.12) \\n DDR HIV\/AIDS Officer (Annex C.13)", + "Paragraph": "Below is a list of appointments for which generic job descriptions are available; these can be found in the annexes as shown. \n Chief, DDR Unit (Annex C.1) \n Deputy Chief, DDR Unit (Annex C.2) \n Senior Military DDR Officer (Annex C.3) \n DDR Field Officer (Annex C.4) \n DDR Field Officer (UNV) (Annex C.5) \n DDR Programme Officer (UNV) (Annex C.6) \n DDR Monitoring and Evaluation Officer (UNV) (Annex C.7) \n DDR Officer (International) (Annex C.8) \n Reintegration Officer (International) (Annex C.9) \n DDR Field Coordination Officer (National) (Annex C.10) \n Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer (Annex C.11) \n DDR Gender Officer (Annex C.12) \n DDR HIV\/AIDS Officer (Annex C.13)", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59977,7 +59977,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1106, - "Paragraph": "Below is a list of appointments for which generic job descriptions are available; these can be found in the annexes as shown. \\n Chief, DDR Unit (Annex C.1) \\n Deputy Chief, DDR Unit (Annex C.2) \\n Senior Military DDR Officer (Annex C.3) \\n DDR Field Officer (Annex C.4) \\n DDR Field Officer (UNV) (Annex C.5) \\n DDR Programme Officer (UNV) (Annex C.6) \\n DDR Monitoring and Evaluation Officer (UNV) (Annex C.7) \\n DDR Officer (International) (Annex C.8) \\n Reintegration Officer (International) (Annex C.9) \\n DDR Field Coordination Officer (National) (Annex C.10) \\n Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer (Annex C.11) \\n DDR Gender Officer (Annex C.12) \\n DDR HIV\/AIDS Officer (Annex C.13)", + "Paragraph": "Below is a list of appointments for which generic job descriptions are available; these can be found in the annexes as shown. \n Chief, DDR Unit (Annex C.1) \n Deputy Chief, DDR Unit (Annex C.2) \n Senior Military DDR Officer (Annex C.3) \n DDR Field Officer (Annex C.4) \n DDR Field Officer (UNV) (Annex C.5) \n DDR Programme Officer (UNV) (Annex C.6) \n DDR Monitoring and Evaluation Officer (UNV) (Annex C.7) \n DDR Officer (International) (Annex C.8) \n Reintegration Officer (International) (Annex C.9) \n DDR Field Coordination Officer (National) (Annex C.10) \n Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer (Annex C.11) \n DDR Gender Officer (Annex C.12) \n DDR HIV\/AIDS Officer (Annex C.13)", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -59988,7 +59988,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.3. Generic job descriptions", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Chief, DDR Unit (Annex C.1) \\n Deputy Chief, DDR Unit (Annex C.2) \\n Senior Military DDR Officer (Annex C.3) \\n DDR Field Officer (Annex C.4) \\n DDR Field Officer (UNV) (Annex C.5) \\n DDR Programme Officer (UNV) (Annex C.6) \\n DDR Monitoring and Evaluation Officer (UNV) (Annex C.7) \\n DDR Officer (International) (Annex C.8) \\n Reintegration Officer (International) (Annex C.9) \\n DDR Field Coordination Officer (National) (Annex C.10) \\n Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer (Annex C.11) \\n DDR Gender Officer (Annex C.12) \\n DDR HIV\/AIDS Officer (Annex C.13)", + "Sentence": "\n Chief, DDR Unit (Annex C.1) \n Deputy Chief, DDR Unit (Annex C.2) \n Senior Military DDR Officer (Annex C.3) \n DDR Field Officer (Annex C.4) \n DDR Field Officer (UNV) (Annex C.5) \n DDR Programme Officer (UNV) (Annex C.6) \n DDR Monitoring and Evaluation Officer (UNV) (Annex C.7) \n DDR Officer (International) (Annex C.8) \n Reintegration Officer (International) (Annex C.9) \n DDR Field Coordination Officer (National) (Annex C.10) \n Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer (Annex C.11) \n DDR Gender Officer (Annex C.12) \n DDR HIV\/AIDS Officer (Annex C.13)", "newParagraph": "list appointment generic job description available found annex shown n chief ddr unit annex c1 n deputy chief ddr unit annex c2 n senior military ddr officer annex c3 n ddr field officer annex c4 n ddr field officer unv annex c5 n ddr programme officer unv annex c6 n ddr monitoring evaluation officer unv annex c7 n ddr officer international annex c8 n reintegration officer international annex c9 n ddr field coordination officer national annex c10 n small arm light weapon officer annex c11 n ddr gender officer annex c12 n ddr hivaids officer annex c13", "ProcessedSent": "n chief ddr unit annex c1 n deputy chief ddr unit annex c2 n senior military ddr officer annex c3 n ddr field officer annex c4 n ddr field officer unv annex c5 n ddr programme officer unv annex c6 n ddr monitoring evaluation officer unv annex c7 n ddr officer international annex c8 n reintegration officer international annex c9 n ddr field coordination officer national annex c10 n small arm light weapon officer annex c11 n ddr gender officer annex c12 n ddr hivaids officer annex c13", "SentID": 3332 @@ -60157,7 +60157,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1112, - "Paragraph": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Deputy SRSG (Resident Coordinator\/Humanitarian Coordinator), the Chief of the DDR Unit is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n provide effective leadership and ensure the overall management of the DDR Unit in all its components; \\n\\n provide strategic vision and guidance to the DDR Unit and its staff; \\n\\n coordinate activities among international and national partners on disarmament, demo\u00ad bilization and reintegration; \\n\\n develop frameworks and policies to integrate civil society in the development and implementation of DDR activities; \\n\\n account to the national disarmament commission on matters of policy as well as peri\u00ad odic updates with regard to the process of disarmament and reintegration; \\n\\n advise the Deputy SRSG (Humanitarian and Development Component) on various aspects of DDR and recommend appropriate action; \\n\\n advise and assist the government on DDR policy and operations; \\n\\n coordinate and integrate activities with other components of the mission on DDR, notably communications and public information, legal affairs, policy\/planning, civilian police and the military component; \\n\\n develop resource mobilization strategy and ensure coordination with donors, includ\u00ad ing the private sector; \\n\\n be responsible for the mission\u2019s DDR programme page in the UN DDR Resource Centre to ensure up\u00adto\u00addate information is presented to the international community. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Deputy SRSG (Resident Coordinator\/Humanitarian Coordinator), the Chief of the DDR Unit is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n provide effective leadership and ensure the overall management of the DDR Unit in all its components; \n\n provide strategic vision and guidance to the DDR Unit and its staff; \n\n coordinate activities among international and national partners on disarmament, demo\u00ad bilization and reintegration; \n\n develop frameworks and policies to integrate civil society in the development and implementation of DDR activities; \n\n account to the national disarmament commission on matters of policy as well as peri\u00ad odic updates with regard to the process of disarmament and reintegration; \n\n advise the Deputy SRSG (Humanitarian and Development Component) on various aspects of DDR and recommend appropriate action; \n\n advise and assist the government on DDR policy and operations; \n\n coordinate and integrate activities with other components of the mission on DDR, notably communications and public information, legal affairs, policy\/planning, civilian police and the military component; \n\n develop resource mobilization strategy and ensure coordination with donors, includ\u00ad ing the private sector; \n\n be responsible for the mission\u2019s DDR programme page in the UN DDR Resource Centre to ensure up\u00adto\u00addate information is presented to the international community. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60168,14 +60168,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.1: Chief, DDR Unit (D1\u2013P5)", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Deputy SRSG (Resident Coordinator\/Humanitarian Coordinator), the Chief of the DDR Unit is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate.", + "Sentence": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Deputy SRSG (Resident Coordinator\/Humanitarian Coordinator), the Chief of the DDR Unit is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate.", "newParagraph": "accountability within limit delegated authority supervision deputy srsg resident coordinatorhumanitarian coordinator chief ddr unit responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn provide effective leadership ensure overall management ddr unit component nn provide strategic vision guidance ddr unit staff nn coordinate activity among international national partner disarmament demo bilization reintegration nn develop framework policy integrate civil society development implementation ddr activity nn account national disarmament commission matter policy well peri odic update regard process disarmament reintegration nn advise deputy srsg humanitarian development component various aspect ddr recommend appropriate action nn advise assist government ddr policy operation nn coordinate integrate activity component mission ddr notably communication public information legal affair policyplanning civilian police military component nn develop resource mobilization strategy ensure coordination donor includ ing private sector nn responsible mission ddr programme page un ddr resource centre ensure date information presented international community nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "accountability within limit delegated authority supervision deputy srsg resident coordinatorhumanitarian coordinator chief ddr unit responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate", "SentID": 3342 }, { "ParagraphID": 1112, - "Paragraph": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Deputy SRSG (Resident Coordinator\/Humanitarian Coordinator), the Chief of the DDR Unit is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n provide effective leadership and ensure the overall management of the DDR Unit in all its components; \\n\\n provide strategic vision and guidance to the DDR Unit and its staff; \\n\\n coordinate activities among international and national partners on disarmament, demo\u00ad bilization and reintegration; \\n\\n develop frameworks and policies to integrate civil society in the development and implementation of DDR activities; \\n\\n account to the national disarmament commission on matters of policy as well as peri\u00ad odic updates with regard to the process of disarmament and reintegration; \\n\\n advise the Deputy SRSG (Humanitarian and Development Component) on various aspects of DDR and recommend appropriate action; \\n\\n advise and assist the government on DDR policy and operations; \\n\\n coordinate and integrate activities with other components of the mission on DDR, notably communications and public information, legal affairs, policy\/planning, civilian police and the military component; \\n\\n develop resource mobilization strategy and ensure coordination with donors, includ\u00ad ing the private sector; \\n\\n be responsible for the mission\u2019s DDR programme page in the UN DDR Resource Centre to ensure up\u00adto\u00addate information is presented to the international community. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Deputy SRSG (Resident Coordinator\/Humanitarian Coordinator), the Chief of the DDR Unit is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n provide effective leadership and ensure the overall management of the DDR Unit in all its components; \n\n provide strategic vision and guidance to the DDR Unit and its staff; \n\n coordinate activities among international and national partners on disarmament, demo\u00ad bilization and reintegration; \n\n develop frameworks and policies to integrate civil society in the development and implementation of DDR activities; \n\n account to the national disarmament commission on matters of policy as well as peri\u00ad odic updates with regard to the process of disarmament and reintegration; \n\n advise the Deputy SRSG (Humanitarian and Development Component) on various aspects of DDR and recommend appropriate action; \n\n advise and assist the government on DDR policy and operations; \n\n coordinate and integrate activities with other components of the mission on DDR, notably communications and public information, legal affairs, policy\/planning, civilian police and the military component; \n\n develop resource mobilization strategy and ensure coordination with donors, includ\u00ad ing the private sector; \n\n be responsible for the mission\u2019s DDR programme page in the UN DDR Resource Centre to ensure up\u00adto\u00addate information is presented to the international community. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60193,7 +60193,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1112, - "Paragraph": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Deputy SRSG (Resident Coordinator\/Humanitarian Coordinator), the Chief of the DDR Unit is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n provide effective leadership and ensure the overall management of the DDR Unit in all its components; \\n\\n provide strategic vision and guidance to the DDR Unit and its staff; \\n\\n coordinate activities among international and national partners on disarmament, demo\u00ad bilization and reintegration; \\n\\n develop frameworks and policies to integrate civil society in the development and implementation of DDR activities; \\n\\n account to the national disarmament commission on matters of policy as well as peri\u00ad odic updates with regard to the process of disarmament and reintegration; \\n\\n advise the Deputy SRSG (Humanitarian and Development Component) on various aspects of DDR and recommend appropriate action; \\n\\n advise and assist the government on DDR policy and operations; \\n\\n coordinate and integrate activities with other components of the mission on DDR, notably communications and public information, legal affairs, policy\/planning, civilian police and the military component; \\n\\n develop resource mobilization strategy and ensure coordination with donors, includ\u00ad ing the private sector; \\n\\n be responsible for the mission\u2019s DDR programme page in the UN DDR Resource Centre to ensure up\u00adto\u00addate information is presented to the international community. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Deputy SRSG (Resident Coordinator\/Humanitarian Coordinator), the Chief of the DDR Unit is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n provide effective leadership and ensure the overall management of the DDR Unit in all its components; \n\n provide strategic vision and guidance to the DDR Unit and its staff; \n\n coordinate activities among international and national partners on disarmament, demo\u00ad bilization and reintegration; \n\n develop frameworks and policies to integrate civil society in the development and implementation of DDR activities; \n\n account to the national disarmament commission on matters of policy as well as peri\u00ad odic updates with regard to the process of disarmament and reintegration; \n\n advise the Deputy SRSG (Humanitarian and Development Component) on various aspects of DDR and recommend appropriate action; \n\n advise and assist the government on DDR policy and operations; \n\n coordinate and integrate activities with other components of the mission on DDR, notably communications and public information, legal affairs, policy\/planning, civilian police and the military component; \n\n develop resource mobilization strategy and ensure coordination with donors, includ\u00ad ing the private sector; \n\n be responsible for the mission\u2019s DDR programme page in the UN DDR Resource Centre to ensure up\u00adto\u00addate information is presented to the international community. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60204,14 +60204,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.1: Chief, DDR Unit (D1\u2013P5)", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n provide effective leadership and ensure the overall management of the DDR Unit in all its components; \\n\\n provide strategic vision and guidance to the DDR Unit and its staff; \\n\\n coordinate activities among international and national partners on disarmament, demo\u00ad bilization and reintegration; \\n\\n develop frameworks and policies to integrate civil society in the development and implementation of DDR activities; \\n\\n account to the national disarmament commission on matters of policy as well as peri\u00ad odic updates with regard to the process of disarmament and reintegration; \\n\\n advise the Deputy SRSG (Humanitarian and Development Component) on various aspects of DDR and recommend appropriate action; \\n\\n advise and assist the government on DDR policy and operations; \\n\\n coordinate and integrate activities with other components of the mission on DDR, notably communications and public information, legal affairs, policy\/planning, civilian police and the military component; \\n\\n develop resource mobilization strategy and ensure coordination with donors, includ\u00ad ing the private sector; \\n\\n be responsible for the mission\u2019s DDR programme page in the UN DDR Resource Centre to ensure up\u00adto\u00addate information is presented to the international community.", + "Sentence": "\n\n provide effective leadership and ensure the overall management of the DDR Unit in all its components; \n\n provide strategic vision and guidance to the DDR Unit and its staff; \n\n coordinate activities among international and national partners on disarmament, demo\u00ad bilization and reintegration; \n\n develop frameworks and policies to integrate civil society in the development and implementation of DDR activities; \n\n account to the national disarmament commission on matters of policy as well as peri\u00ad odic updates with regard to the process of disarmament and reintegration; \n\n advise the Deputy SRSG (Humanitarian and Development Component) on various aspects of DDR and recommend appropriate action; \n\n advise and assist the government on DDR policy and operations; \n\n coordinate and integrate activities with other components of the mission on DDR, notably communications and public information, legal affairs, policy\/planning, civilian police and the military component; \n\n develop resource mobilization strategy and ensure coordination with donors, includ\u00ad ing the private sector; \n\n be responsible for the mission\u2019s DDR programme page in the UN DDR Resource Centre to ensure up\u00adto\u00addate information is presented to the international community.", "newParagraph": "accountability within limit delegated authority supervision deputy srsg resident coordinatorhumanitarian coordinator chief ddr unit responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn provide effective leadership ensure overall management ddr unit component nn provide strategic vision guidance ddr unit staff nn coordinate activity among international national partner disarmament demo bilization reintegration nn develop framework policy integrate civil society development implementation ddr activity nn account national disarmament commission matter policy well peri odic update regard process disarmament reintegration nn advise deputy srsg humanitarian development component various aspect ddr recommend appropriate action nn advise assist government ddr policy operation nn coordinate integrate activity component mission ddr notably communication public information legal affair policyplanning civilian police military component nn develop resource mobilization strategy ensure coordination donor includ ing private sector nn responsible mission ddr programme page un ddr resource centre ensure date information presented international community nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "nn provide effective leadership ensure overall management ddr unit component nn provide strategic vision guidance ddr unit staff nn coordinate activity among international national partner disarmament demo bilization reintegration nn develop framework policy integrate civil society development implementation ddr activity nn account national disarmament commission matter policy well peri odic update regard process disarmament reintegration nn advise deputy srsg humanitarian development component various aspect ddr recommend appropriate action nn advise assist government ddr policy operation nn coordinate integrate activity component mission ddr notably communication public information legal affair policyplanning civilian police military component nn develop resource mobilization strategy ensure coordination donor includ ing private sector nn responsible mission ddr programme page un ddr resource centre ensure date information presented international community", "SentID": 3344 }, { "ParagraphID": 1112, - "Paragraph": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Deputy SRSG (Resident Coordinator\/Humanitarian Coordinator), the Chief of the DDR Unit is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n provide effective leadership and ensure the overall management of the DDR Unit in all its components; \\n\\n provide strategic vision and guidance to the DDR Unit and its staff; \\n\\n coordinate activities among international and national partners on disarmament, demo\u00ad bilization and reintegration; \\n\\n develop frameworks and policies to integrate civil society in the development and implementation of DDR activities; \\n\\n account to the national disarmament commission on matters of policy as well as peri\u00ad odic updates with regard to the process of disarmament and reintegration; \\n\\n advise the Deputy SRSG (Humanitarian and Development Component) on various aspects of DDR and recommend appropriate action; \\n\\n advise and assist the government on DDR policy and operations; \\n\\n coordinate and integrate activities with other components of the mission on DDR, notably communications and public information, legal affairs, policy\/planning, civilian police and the military component; \\n\\n develop resource mobilization strategy and ensure coordination with donors, includ\u00ad ing the private sector; \\n\\n be responsible for the mission\u2019s DDR programme page in the UN DDR Resource Centre to ensure up\u00adto\u00addate information is presented to the international community. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Deputy SRSG (Resident Coordinator\/Humanitarian Coordinator), the Chief of the DDR Unit is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n provide effective leadership and ensure the overall management of the DDR Unit in all its components; \n\n provide strategic vision and guidance to the DDR Unit and its staff; \n\n coordinate activities among international and national partners on disarmament, demo\u00ad bilization and reintegration; \n\n develop frameworks and policies to integrate civil society in the development and implementation of DDR activities; \n\n account to the national disarmament commission on matters of policy as well as peri\u00ad odic updates with regard to the process of disarmament and reintegration; \n\n advise the Deputy SRSG (Humanitarian and Development Component) on various aspects of DDR and recommend appropriate action; \n\n advise and assist the government on DDR policy and operations; \n\n coordinate and integrate activities with other components of the mission on DDR, notably communications and public information, legal affairs, policy\/planning, civilian police and the military component; \n\n develop resource mobilization strategy and ensure coordination with donors, includ\u00ad ing the private sector; \n\n be responsible for the mission\u2019s DDR programme page in the UN DDR Resource Centre to ensure up\u00adto\u00addate information is presented to the international community. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60222,14 +60222,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.1: Chief, DDR Unit (D1\u2013P5)", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "newParagraph": "accountability within limit delegated authority supervision deputy srsg resident coordinatorhumanitarian coordinator chief ddr unit responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn provide effective leadership ensure overall management ddr unit component nn provide strategic vision guidance ddr unit staff nn coordinate activity among international national partner disarmament demo bilization reintegration nn develop framework policy integrate civil society development implementation ddr activity nn account national disarmament commission matter policy well peri odic update regard process disarmament reintegration nn advise deputy srsg humanitarian development component various aspect ddr recommend appropriate action nn advise assist government ddr policy operation nn coordinate integrate activity component mission ddr notably communication public information legal affair policyplanning civilian police military component nn develop resource mobilization strategy ensure coordination donor includ ing private sector nn responsible mission ddr programme page un ddr resource centre ensure date information presented international community nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "SentID": 3345 }, { "ParagraphID": 1113, - "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options, concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options, concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60247,7 +60247,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1113, - "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options, concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options, concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60258,14 +60258,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.1: Chief, DDR Unit (D1\u2013P5)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills.", + "Sentence": "\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills.", "newParagraph": "vision identifies defines strategic direction unit work programme ability recognize requirement translate requirement programme service achieve objective goal n professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation strong negotiating skill proven critical thinking skill n leadership proven ability provide effective leadership transfer advice knowl edge staff level different national cultural background n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff provide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize coor dinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesproblems ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programme service offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication excellent communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation strong negotiating skill proven critical thinking skill", "SentID": 3347 }, { "ParagraphID": 1113, - "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options, concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options, concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60276,14 +60276,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.1: Chief, DDR Unit (D1\u2013P5)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds.", + "Sentence": "\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds.", "newParagraph": "vision identifies defines strategic direction unit work programme ability recognize requirement translate requirement programme service achieve objective goal n professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation strong negotiating skill proven critical thinking skill n leadership proven ability provide effective leadership transfer advice knowl edge staff level different national cultural background n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff provide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize coor dinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesproblems ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programme service offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication excellent communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n leadership proven ability provide effective leadership transfer advice knowl edge staff level different national cultural background", "SentID": 3348 }, { "ParagraphID": 1113, - "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options, concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options, concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60294,14 +60294,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.1: Chief, DDR Unit (D1\u2013P5)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support.", + "Sentence": "\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support.", "newParagraph": "vision identifies defines strategic direction unit work programme ability recognize requirement translate requirement programme service achieve objective goal n professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation strong negotiating skill proven critical thinking skill n leadership proven ability provide effective leadership transfer advice knowl edge staff level different national cultural background n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff provide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize coor dinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesproblems ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programme service offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication excellent communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff provide guidance support", "SentID": 3349 }, { "ParagraphID": 1113, - "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options, concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options, concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60312,14 +60312,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.1: Chief, DDR Unit (D1\u2013P5)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others.", + "Sentence": "\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others.", "newParagraph": "vision identifies defines strategic direction unit work programme ability recognize requirement translate requirement programme service achieve objective goal n professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation strong negotiating skill proven critical thinking skill n leadership proven ability provide effective leadership transfer advice knowl edge staff level different national cultural background n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff provide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize coor dinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesproblems ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programme service offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication excellent communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize coor dinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others", "SentID": 3350 }, { "ParagraphID": 1113, - "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options, concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options, concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60330,14 +60330,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.1: Chief, DDR Unit (D1\u2013P5)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives.", + "Sentence": "\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives.", "newParagraph": "vision identifies defines strategic direction unit work programme ability recognize requirement translate requirement programme service achieve objective goal n professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation strong negotiating skill proven critical thinking skill n leadership proven ability provide effective leadership transfer advice knowl edge staff level different national cultural background n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff provide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize coor dinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesproblems ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programme service offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication excellent communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesproblems ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative", "SentID": 3351 }, { "ParagraphID": 1113, - "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options, concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options, concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60348,14 +60348,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.1: Chief, DDR Unit (D1\u2013P5)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs.", + "Sentence": "\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs.", "newParagraph": "vision identifies defines strategic direction unit work programme ability recognize requirement translate requirement programme service achieve objective goal n professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation strong negotiating skill proven critical thinking skill n leadership proven ability provide effective leadership transfer advice knowl edge staff level different national cultural background n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff provide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize coor dinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesproblems ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programme service offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication excellent communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n creativity ability actively seek improve programme service offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need", "SentID": 3352 }, { "ParagraphID": 1113, - "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options, concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options, concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60366,14 +60366,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.1: Chief, DDR Unit (D1\u2013P5)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options, concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials.", + "Sentence": "\n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options, concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials.", "newParagraph": "vision identifies defines strategic direction unit work programme ability recognize requirement translate requirement programme service achieve objective goal n professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation strong negotiating skill proven critical thinking skill n leadership proven ability provide effective leadership transfer advice knowl edge staff level different national cultural background n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff provide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize coor dinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesproblems ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programme service offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication excellent communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n communication excellent communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official", "SentID": 3353 }, { "ParagraphID": 1113, - "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options, concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options, concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60384,14 +60384,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.1: Chief, DDR Unit (D1\u2013P5)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Sentence": "\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "newParagraph": "vision identifies defines strategic direction unit work programme ability recognize requirement translate requirement programme service achieve objective goal n professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation strong negotiating skill proven critical thinking skill n leadership proven ability provide effective leadership transfer advice knowl edge staff level different national cultural background n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff provide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize coor dinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesproblems ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programme service offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication excellent communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "SentID": 3354 }, { "ParagraphID": 1114, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree (Masters or equivalent) in social sciences, manage\u00ad ment, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. \\n Experience: Minimum of 10 years of progressively responsible professional experience in peacekeeping and peace\u00adbuilding operations in the field of DDR of ex\u00adcombatants, including extensive experience in working on small arms reduction programmes. Detailed knowledge of development process and post\u00adconflict related issues particularly on the DDR process. Additional experience in developing support strategies for IDPs, refugees, disaffected popu\u00ad lations, children and women in post\u00adconflict situations will be valuable. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree (Masters or equivalent) in social sciences, manage\u00ad ment, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. \n Experience: Minimum of 10 years of progressively responsible professional experience in peacekeeping and peace\u00adbuilding operations in the field of DDR of ex\u00adcombatants, including extensive experience in working on small arms reduction programmes. Detailed knowledge of development process and post\u00adconflict related issues particularly on the DDR process. Additional experience in developing support strategies for IDPs, refugees, disaffected popu\u00ad lations, children and women in post\u00adconflict situations will be valuable. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60409,7 +60409,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1114, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree (Masters or equivalent) in social sciences, manage\u00ad ment, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. \\n Experience: Minimum of 10 years of progressively responsible professional experience in peacekeeping and peace\u00adbuilding operations in the field of DDR of ex\u00adcombatants, including extensive experience in working on small arms reduction programmes. Detailed knowledge of development process and post\u00adconflict related issues particularly on the DDR process. Additional experience in developing support strategies for IDPs, refugees, disaffected popu\u00ad lations, children and women in post\u00adconflict situations will be valuable. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree (Masters or equivalent) in social sciences, manage\u00ad ment, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. \n Experience: Minimum of 10 years of progressively responsible professional experience in peacekeeping and peace\u00adbuilding operations in the field of DDR of ex\u00adcombatants, including extensive experience in working on small arms reduction programmes. Detailed knowledge of development process and post\u00adconflict related issues particularly on the DDR process. Additional experience in developing support strategies for IDPs, refugees, disaffected popu\u00ad lations, children and women in post\u00adconflict situations will be valuable. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60420,14 +60420,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.1: Chief, DDR Unit (D1\u2013P5)", "Heading3": "Qualifications", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Experience: Minimum of 10 years of progressively responsible professional experience in peacekeeping and peace\u00adbuilding operations in the field of DDR of ex\u00adcombatants, including extensive experience in working on small arms reduction programmes.", + "Sentence": "\n Experience: Minimum of 10 years of progressively responsible professional experience in peacekeeping and peace\u00adbuilding operations in the field of DDR of ex\u00adcombatants, including extensive experience in working on small arms reduction programmes.", "newParagraph": "education advanced university degree master equivalent social science manage ment economics business administration international development relevant field n experience minimum 10 year progressively responsible professional experience peacekeeping peace building operation field ddr ex combatant including extensive experience working small arm reduction programme detailed knowledge development process post conflict related issue particularly ddr process additional experience developing support strategy idp refugee disaffected popu lations child woman post conflict situation valuable n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "ProcessedSent": "n experience minimum 10 year progressively responsible professional experience peacekeeping peace building operation field ddr ex combatant including extensive experience working small arm reduction programme", "SentID": 3356 }, { "ParagraphID": 1114, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree (Masters or equivalent) in social sciences, manage\u00ad ment, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. \\n Experience: Minimum of 10 years of progressively responsible professional experience in peacekeeping and peace\u00adbuilding operations in the field of DDR of ex\u00adcombatants, including extensive experience in working on small arms reduction programmes. Detailed knowledge of development process and post\u00adconflict related issues particularly on the DDR process. Additional experience in developing support strategies for IDPs, refugees, disaffected popu\u00ad lations, children and women in post\u00adconflict situations will be valuable. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree (Masters or equivalent) in social sciences, manage\u00ad ment, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. \n Experience: Minimum of 10 years of progressively responsible professional experience in peacekeeping and peace\u00adbuilding operations in the field of DDR of ex\u00adcombatants, including extensive experience in working on small arms reduction programmes. Detailed knowledge of development process and post\u00adconflict related issues particularly on the DDR process. Additional experience in developing support strategies for IDPs, refugees, disaffected popu\u00ad lations, children and women in post\u00adconflict situations will be valuable. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60445,7 +60445,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1114, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree (Masters or equivalent) in social sciences, manage\u00ad ment, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. \\n Experience: Minimum of 10 years of progressively responsible professional experience in peacekeeping and peace\u00adbuilding operations in the field of DDR of ex\u00adcombatants, including extensive experience in working on small arms reduction programmes. Detailed knowledge of development process and post\u00adconflict related issues particularly on the DDR process. Additional experience in developing support strategies for IDPs, refugees, disaffected popu\u00ad lations, children and women in post\u00adconflict situations will be valuable. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree (Masters or equivalent) in social sciences, manage\u00ad ment, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. \n Experience: Minimum of 10 years of progressively responsible professional experience in peacekeeping and peace\u00adbuilding operations in the field of DDR of ex\u00adcombatants, including extensive experience in working on small arms reduction programmes. Detailed knowledge of development process and post\u00adconflict related issues particularly on the DDR process. Additional experience in developing support strategies for IDPs, refugees, disaffected popu\u00ad lations, children and women in post\u00adconflict situations will be valuable. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60463,7 +60463,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1114, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree (Masters or equivalent) in social sciences, manage\u00ad ment, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. \\n Experience: Minimum of 10 years of progressively responsible professional experience in peacekeeping and peace\u00adbuilding operations in the field of DDR of ex\u00adcombatants, including extensive experience in working on small arms reduction programmes. Detailed knowledge of development process and post\u00adconflict related issues particularly on the DDR process. Additional experience in developing support strategies for IDPs, refugees, disaffected popu\u00ad lations, children and women in post\u00adconflict situations will be valuable. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree (Masters or equivalent) in social sciences, manage\u00ad ment, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. \n Experience: Minimum of 10 years of progressively responsible professional experience in peacekeeping and peace\u00adbuilding operations in the field of DDR of ex\u00adcombatants, including extensive experience in working on small arms reduction programmes. Detailed knowledge of development process and post\u00adconflict related issues particularly on the DDR process. Additional experience in developing support strategies for IDPs, refugees, disaffected popu\u00ad lations, children and women in post\u00adconflict situations will be valuable. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60474,7 +60474,7 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.1: Chief, DDR Unit (D1\u2013P5)", "Heading3": "Qualifications", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Sentence": "\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "newParagraph": "education advanced university degree master equivalent social science manage ment economics business administration international development relevant field n experience minimum 10 year progressively responsible professional experience peacekeeping peace building operation field ddr ex combatant including extensive experience working small arm reduction programme detailed knowledge development process post conflict related issue particularly ddr process additional experience developing support strategy idp refugee disaffected popu lations child woman post conflict situation valuable n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "ProcessedSent": "n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "SentID": 3359 @@ -60571,7 +60571,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1117, - "Paragraph": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Deputy Chief is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n assist Chief of DDR Unit in the overall management of the DDR Unit in all its components; support Chief of DDR Unit in the overall day\u00adto\u00adday supervision of staff and field operations; \\n\\n support Chief of DDR Unit in the identification and development of synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and international) at the strategic, technical and operational levels; \\n\\n support Chief of DDR Unit in resource mobilization and ensure coordination with donors, including the private sector; \\n\\n provide technical advice and support to the national disarmament commission and programme as necessary; \\n\\n act as the programmatic linkage to the work of the UN country team on the broader reintegration and development issues of peace\u00adbuilding; \\n\\n provide overall coordination and financial responsibility for the programming and implementation of UNDP funds for disarmament and reintegration; \\n\\n oversee the development and coordination of the implementation of a comprehensive socio\u00adeconomic reintegration framework for members of armed forces and groups taking advantage of existing or planned recovery and reconstruction plans; \\n\\n oversee the development and coordination of the implementation of a comprehensive national capacity development support strategy focusing on weapons control, manage\u00ad ment, stockpiling and destruction; \\n\\n support Chief of DDR Unit in all other areas necessary for the success of DDR activities. Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Deputy Chief is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n assist Chief of DDR Unit in the overall management of the DDR Unit in all its components; support Chief of DDR Unit in the overall day\u00adto\u00adday supervision of staff and field operations; \n\n support Chief of DDR Unit in the identification and development of synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and international) at the strategic, technical and operational levels; \n\n support Chief of DDR Unit in resource mobilization and ensure coordination with donors, including the private sector; \n\n provide technical advice and support to the national disarmament commission and programme as necessary; \n\n act as the programmatic linkage to the work of the UN country team on the broader reintegration and development issues of peace\u00adbuilding; \n\n provide overall coordination and financial responsibility for the programming and implementation of UNDP funds for disarmament and reintegration; \n\n oversee the development and coordination of the implementation of a comprehensive socio\u00adeconomic reintegration framework for members of armed forces and groups taking advantage of existing or planned recovery and reconstruction plans; \n\n oversee the development and coordination of the implementation of a comprehensive national capacity development support strategy focusing on weapons control, manage\u00ad ment, stockpiling and destruction; \n\n support Chief of DDR Unit in all other areas necessary for the success of DDR activities. Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60582,14 +60582,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.2: Deputy Chief, DDR Unit (P5\u2013P4)", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Deputy Chief is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate.", + "Sentence": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Deputy Chief is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate.", "newParagraph": "accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit deputy chief responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn assist chief ddr unit overall management ddr unit component support chief ddr unit overall day day supervision staff field operation nn support chief ddr unit identification development synergy partnership actor national international strategic technical operational level nn support chief ddr unit resource mobilization ensure coordination donor including private sector nn provide technical advice support national disarmament commission programme necessary nn act programmatic linkage work un country team broader reintegration development issue peace building nn provide overall coordination financial responsibility programming implementation undp fund disarmament reintegration nn oversee development coordination implementation comprehensive socio economic reintegration framework member armed force group taking advantage existing planned recovery reconstruction plan nn oversee development coordination implementation comprehensive national capacity development support strategy focusing weapon control manage ment stockpiling destruction nn support chief ddr unit area necessary success ddr activity core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit deputy chief responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate", "SentID": 3365 }, { "ParagraphID": 1117, - "Paragraph": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Deputy Chief is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n assist Chief of DDR Unit in the overall management of the DDR Unit in all its components; support Chief of DDR Unit in the overall day\u00adto\u00adday supervision of staff and field operations; \\n\\n support Chief of DDR Unit in the identification and development of synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and international) at the strategic, technical and operational levels; \\n\\n support Chief of DDR Unit in resource mobilization and ensure coordination with donors, including the private sector; \\n\\n provide technical advice and support to the national disarmament commission and programme as necessary; \\n\\n act as the programmatic linkage to the work of the UN country team on the broader reintegration and development issues of peace\u00adbuilding; \\n\\n provide overall coordination and financial responsibility for the programming and implementation of UNDP funds for disarmament and reintegration; \\n\\n oversee the development and coordination of the implementation of a comprehensive socio\u00adeconomic reintegration framework for members of armed forces and groups taking advantage of existing or planned recovery and reconstruction plans; \\n\\n oversee the development and coordination of the implementation of a comprehensive national capacity development support strategy focusing on weapons control, manage\u00ad ment, stockpiling and destruction; \\n\\n support Chief of DDR Unit in all other areas necessary for the success of DDR activities. Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Deputy Chief is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n assist Chief of DDR Unit in the overall management of the DDR Unit in all its components; support Chief of DDR Unit in the overall day\u00adto\u00adday supervision of staff and field operations; \n\n support Chief of DDR Unit in the identification and development of synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and international) at the strategic, technical and operational levels; \n\n support Chief of DDR Unit in resource mobilization and ensure coordination with donors, including the private sector; \n\n provide technical advice and support to the national disarmament commission and programme as necessary; \n\n act as the programmatic linkage to the work of the UN country team on the broader reintegration and development issues of peace\u00adbuilding; \n\n provide overall coordination and financial responsibility for the programming and implementation of UNDP funds for disarmament and reintegration; \n\n oversee the development and coordination of the implementation of a comprehensive socio\u00adeconomic reintegration framework for members of armed forces and groups taking advantage of existing or planned recovery and reconstruction plans; \n\n oversee the development and coordination of the implementation of a comprehensive national capacity development support strategy focusing on weapons control, manage\u00ad ment, stockpiling and destruction; \n\n support Chief of DDR Unit in all other areas necessary for the success of DDR activities. Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60607,7 +60607,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1117, - "Paragraph": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Deputy Chief is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n assist Chief of DDR Unit in the overall management of the DDR Unit in all its components; support Chief of DDR Unit in the overall day\u00adto\u00adday supervision of staff and field operations; \\n\\n support Chief of DDR Unit in the identification and development of synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and international) at the strategic, technical and operational levels; \\n\\n support Chief of DDR Unit in resource mobilization and ensure coordination with donors, including the private sector; \\n\\n provide technical advice and support to the national disarmament commission and programme as necessary; \\n\\n act as the programmatic linkage to the work of the UN country team on the broader reintegration and development issues of peace\u00adbuilding; \\n\\n provide overall coordination and financial responsibility for the programming and implementation of UNDP funds for disarmament and reintegration; \\n\\n oversee the development and coordination of the implementation of a comprehensive socio\u00adeconomic reintegration framework for members of armed forces and groups taking advantage of existing or planned recovery and reconstruction plans; \\n\\n oversee the development and coordination of the implementation of a comprehensive national capacity development support strategy focusing on weapons control, manage\u00ad ment, stockpiling and destruction; \\n\\n support Chief of DDR Unit in all other areas necessary for the success of DDR activities. Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Deputy Chief is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n assist Chief of DDR Unit in the overall management of the DDR Unit in all its components; support Chief of DDR Unit in the overall day\u00adto\u00adday supervision of staff and field operations; \n\n support Chief of DDR Unit in the identification and development of synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and international) at the strategic, technical and operational levels; \n\n support Chief of DDR Unit in resource mobilization and ensure coordination with donors, including the private sector; \n\n provide technical advice and support to the national disarmament commission and programme as necessary; \n\n act as the programmatic linkage to the work of the UN country team on the broader reintegration and development issues of peace\u00adbuilding; \n\n provide overall coordination and financial responsibility for the programming and implementation of UNDP funds for disarmament and reintegration; \n\n oversee the development and coordination of the implementation of a comprehensive socio\u00adeconomic reintegration framework for members of armed forces and groups taking advantage of existing or planned recovery and reconstruction plans; \n\n oversee the development and coordination of the implementation of a comprehensive national capacity development support strategy focusing on weapons control, manage\u00ad ment, stockpiling and destruction; \n\n support Chief of DDR Unit in all other areas necessary for the success of DDR activities. Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60618,14 +60618,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.2: Deputy Chief, DDR Unit (P5\u2013P4)", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n assist Chief of DDR Unit in the overall management of the DDR Unit in all its components; support Chief of DDR Unit in the overall day\u00adto\u00adday supervision of staff and field operations; \\n\\n support Chief of DDR Unit in the identification and development of synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and international) at the strategic, technical and operational levels; \\n\\n support Chief of DDR Unit in resource mobilization and ensure coordination with donors, including the private sector; \\n\\n provide technical advice and support to the national disarmament commission and programme as necessary; \\n\\n act as the programmatic linkage to the work of the UN country team on the broader reintegration and development issues of peace\u00adbuilding; \\n\\n provide overall coordination and financial responsibility for the programming and implementation of UNDP funds for disarmament and reintegration; \\n\\n oversee the development and coordination of the implementation of a comprehensive socio\u00adeconomic reintegration framework for members of armed forces and groups taking advantage of existing or planned recovery and reconstruction plans; \\n\\n oversee the development and coordination of the implementation of a comprehensive national capacity development support strategy focusing on weapons control, manage\u00ad ment, stockpiling and destruction; \\n\\n support Chief of DDR Unit in all other areas necessary for the success of DDR activities.", + "Sentence": "\n\n assist Chief of DDR Unit in the overall management of the DDR Unit in all its components; support Chief of DDR Unit in the overall day\u00adto\u00adday supervision of staff and field operations; \n\n support Chief of DDR Unit in the identification and development of synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and international) at the strategic, technical and operational levels; \n\n support Chief of DDR Unit in resource mobilization and ensure coordination with donors, including the private sector; \n\n provide technical advice and support to the national disarmament commission and programme as necessary; \n\n act as the programmatic linkage to the work of the UN country team on the broader reintegration and development issues of peace\u00adbuilding; \n\n provide overall coordination and financial responsibility for the programming and implementation of UNDP funds for disarmament and reintegration; \n\n oversee the development and coordination of the implementation of a comprehensive socio\u00adeconomic reintegration framework for members of armed forces and groups taking advantage of existing or planned recovery and reconstruction plans; \n\n oversee the development and coordination of the implementation of a comprehensive national capacity development support strategy focusing on weapons control, manage\u00ad ment, stockpiling and destruction; \n\n support Chief of DDR Unit in all other areas necessary for the success of DDR activities.", "newParagraph": "accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit deputy chief responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn assist chief ddr unit overall management ddr unit component support chief ddr unit overall day day supervision staff field operation nn support chief ddr unit identification development synergy partnership actor national international strategic technical operational level nn support chief ddr unit resource mobilization ensure coordination donor including private sector nn provide technical advice support national disarmament commission programme necessary nn act programmatic linkage work un country team broader reintegration development issue peace building nn provide overall coordination financial responsibility programming implementation undp fund disarmament reintegration nn oversee development coordination implementation comprehensive socio economic reintegration framework member armed force group taking advantage existing planned recovery reconstruction plan nn oversee development coordination implementation comprehensive national capacity development support strategy focusing weapon control manage ment stockpiling destruction nn support chief ddr unit area necessary success ddr activity core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "nn assist chief ddr unit overall management ddr unit component support chief ddr unit overall day day supervision staff field operation nn support chief ddr unit identification development synergy partnership actor national international strategic technical operational level nn support chief ddr unit resource mobilization ensure coordination donor including private sector nn provide technical advice support national disarmament commission programme necessary nn act programmatic linkage work un country team broader reintegration development issue peace building nn provide overall coordination financial responsibility programming implementation undp fund disarmament reintegration nn oversee development coordination implementation comprehensive socio economic reintegration framework member armed force group taking advantage existing planned recovery reconstruction plan nn oversee development coordination implementation comprehensive national capacity development support strategy focusing weapon control manage ment stockpiling destruction nn support chief ddr unit area necessary success ddr activity", "SentID": 3367 }, { "ParagraphID": 1117, - "Paragraph": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Deputy Chief is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n assist Chief of DDR Unit in the overall management of the DDR Unit in all its components; support Chief of DDR Unit in the overall day\u00adto\u00adday supervision of staff and field operations; \\n\\n support Chief of DDR Unit in the identification and development of synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and international) at the strategic, technical and operational levels; \\n\\n support Chief of DDR Unit in resource mobilization and ensure coordination with donors, including the private sector; \\n\\n provide technical advice and support to the national disarmament commission and programme as necessary; \\n\\n act as the programmatic linkage to the work of the UN country team on the broader reintegration and development issues of peace\u00adbuilding; \\n\\n provide overall coordination and financial responsibility for the programming and implementation of UNDP funds for disarmament and reintegration; \\n\\n oversee the development and coordination of the implementation of a comprehensive socio\u00adeconomic reintegration framework for members of armed forces and groups taking advantage of existing or planned recovery and reconstruction plans; \\n\\n oversee the development and coordination of the implementation of a comprehensive national capacity development support strategy focusing on weapons control, manage\u00ad ment, stockpiling and destruction; \\n\\n support Chief of DDR Unit in all other areas necessary for the success of DDR activities. Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Deputy Chief is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n assist Chief of DDR Unit in the overall management of the DDR Unit in all its components; support Chief of DDR Unit in the overall day\u00adto\u00adday supervision of staff and field operations; \n\n support Chief of DDR Unit in the identification and development of synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and international) at the strategic, technical and operational levels; \n\n support Chief of DDR Unit in resource mobilization and ensure coordination with donors, including the private sector; \n\n provide technical advice and support to the national disarmament commission and programme as necessary; \n\n act as the programmatic linkage to the work of the UN country team on the broader reintegration and development issues of peace\u00adbuilding; \n\n provide overall coordination and financial responsibility for the programming and implementation of UNDP funds for disarmament and reintegration; \n\n oversee the development and coordination of the implementation of a comprehensive socio\u00adeconomic reintegration framework for members of armed forces and groups taking advantage of existing or planned recovery and reconstruction plans; \n\n oversee the development and coordination of the implementation of a comprehensive national capacity development support strategy focusing on weapons control, manage\u00ad ment, stockpiling and destruction; \n\n support Chief of DDR Unit in all other areas necessary for the success of DDR activities. Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60643,7 +60643,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1118, - "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and diff\u00ad erent options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely, conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and diff\u00ad erent options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely, conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60661,7 +60661,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1118, - "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and diff\u00ad erent options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely, conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and diff\u00ad erent options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely, conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60672,14 +60672,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.2: Deputy Chief, DDR Unit (P5\u2013P4)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills.", + "Sentence": "\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills.", "newParagraph": "vision identifies defines strategic direction unit work programme ability recognize requirement translate requirement programme service achieve objective goal n professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation strong negotiating skill proven critical thinking skill n leadership proven ability provide effective leadership transfer advice knowl edge staff level different national cultural background n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize coor dinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesproblems ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative creativity ability actively seek improve programme service offer new diff erent option solve problemsmeet client need n communication excellent communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation strong negotiating skill proven critical thinking skill", "SentID": 3370 }, { "ParagraphID": 1118, - "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and diff\u00ad erent options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely, conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and diff\u00ad erent options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely, conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60690,14 +60690,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.2: Deputy Chief, DDR Unit (P5\u2013P4)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds.", + "Sentence": "\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds.", "newParagraph": "vision identifies defines strategic direction unit work programme ability recognize requirement translate requirement programme service achieve objective goal n professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation strong negotiating skill proven critical thinking skill n leadership proven ability provide effective leadership transfer advice knowl edge staff level different national cultural background n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize coor dinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesproblems ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative creativity ability actively seek improve programme service offer new diff erent option solve problemsmeet client need n communication excellent communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n leadership proven ability provide effective leadership transfer advice knowl edge staff level different national cultural background", "SentID": 3371 }, { "ParagraphID": 1118, - "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and diff\u00ad erent options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely, conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and diff\u00ad erent options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely, conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60708,14 +60708,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.2: Deputy Chief, DDR Unit (P5\u2013P4)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support.", + "Sentence": "\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support.", "newParagraph": "vision identifies defines strategic direction unit work programme ability recognize requirement translate requirement programme service achieve objective goal n professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation strong negotiating skill proven critical thinking skill n leadership proven ability provide effective leadership transfer advice knowl edge staff level different national cultural background n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize coor dinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesproblems ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative creativity ability actively seek improve programme service offer new diff erent option solve problemsmeet client need n communication excellent communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support", "SentID": 3372 }, { "ParagraphID": 1118, - "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and diff\u00ad erent options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely, conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and diff\u00ad erent options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely, conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60726,14 +60726,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.2: Deputy Chief, DDR Unit (P5\u2013P4)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others.", + "Sentence": "\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others.", "newParagraph": "vision identifies defines strategic direction unit work programme ability recognize requirement translate requirement programme service achieve objective goal n professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation strong negotiating skill proven critical thinking skill n leadership proven ability provide effective leadership transfer advice knowl edge staff level different national cultural background n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize coor dinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesproblems ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative creativity ability actively seek improve programme service offer new diff erent option solve problemsmeet client need n communication excellent communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize coor dinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others", "SentID": 3373 }, { "ParagraphID": 1118, - "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and diff\u00ad erent options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely, conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and diff\u00ad erent options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely, conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60744,14 +60744,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.2: Deputy Chief, DDR Unit (P5\u2013P4)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives.", + "Sentence": "\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives.", "newParagraph": "vision identifies defines strategic direction unit work programme ability recognize requirement translate requirement programme service achieve objective goal n professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation strong negotiating skill proven critical thinking skill n leadership proven ability provide effective leadership transfer advice knowl edge staff level different national cultural background n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize coor dinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesproblems ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative creativity ability actively seek improve programme service offer new diff erent option solve problemsmeet client need n communication excellent communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesproblems ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative", "SentID": 3374 }, { "ParagraphID": 1118, - "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and diff\u00ad erent options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely, conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and diff\u00ad erent options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely, conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60769,7 +60769,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1118, - "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and diff\u00ad erent options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely, conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and diff\u00ad erent options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely, conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60780,14 +60780,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.2: Deputy Chief, DDR Unit (P5\u2013P4)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely, conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials.", + "Sentence": "\n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely, conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials.", "newParagraph": "vision identifies defines strategic direction unit work programme ability recognize requirement translate requirement programme service achieve objective goal n professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation strong negotiating skill proven critical thinking skill n leadership proven ability provide effective leadership transfer advice knowl edge staff level different national cultural background n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize coor dinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesproblems ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative creativity ability actively seek improve programme service offer new diff erent option solve problemsmeet client need n communication excellent communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n communication excellent communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official", "SentID": 3376 }, { "ParagraphID": 1118, - "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and diff\u00ad erent options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely, conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Vision: Identifies and defines strategic direction for the unit\u2019s work programme; ability to recognize requirements and translate requirements into programmes and services that achieve objectives and goals. \n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations; strong negotiating skills; proven critical thinking skills. \n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge to staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, coor\u00ad dinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes and services, offer new and diff\u00ad erent options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely, conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60798,14 +60798,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.2: Deputy Chief, DDR Unit (P5\u2013P4)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Sentence": "\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills and the ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "newParagraph": "vision identifies defines strategic direction unit work programme ability recognize requirement translate requirement programme service achieve objective goal n professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation strong negotiating skill proven critical thinking skill n leadership proven ability provide effective leadership transfer advice knowl edge staff level different national cultural background n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize coor dinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesproblems ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative creativity ability actively seek improve programme service offer new diff erent option solve problemsmeet client need n communication excellent communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "SentID": 3377 }, { "ParagraphID": 1119, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree (Masters or equivalent) in social sciences, manage\u00ad ment, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. \\n Experience: Minimum of 10 years of progressively responsible professional experience in peacekeeping and peace\u00adbuilding operations in the field of DDR of ex\u00adcombatants, including extensive experience in working on small arms reduction programmes. Detailed knowledge of development process and post\u00adconflict related issues, particularly on the DDR process. Additional experience in developing support strategies for IDPs, refugees, disaffected popu\u00ad lations, children and women in post\u00adconflict situations will be valuable. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree (Masters or equivalent) in social sciences, manage\u00ad ment, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. \n Experience: Minimum of 10 years of progressively responsible professional experience in peacekeeping and peace\u00adbuilding operations in the field of DDR of ex\u00adcombatants, including extensive experience in working on small arms reduction programmes. Detailed knowledge of development process and post\u00adconflict related issues, particularly on the DDR process. Additional experience in developing support strategies for IDPs, refugees, disaffected popu\u00ad lations, children and women in post\u00adconflict situations will be valuable. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60823,7 +60823,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1119, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree (Masters or equivalent) in social sciences, manage\u00ad ment, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. \\n Experience: Minimum of 10 years of progressively responsible professional experience in peacekeeping and peace\u00adbuilding operations in the field of DDR of ex\u00adcombatants, including extensive experience in working on small arms reduction programmes. Detailed knowledge of development process and post\u00adconflict related issues, particularly on the DDR process. Additional experience in developing support strategies for IDPs, refugees, disaffected popu\u00ad lations, children and women in post\u00adconflict situations will be valuable. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree (Masters or equivalent) in social sciences, manage\u00ad ment, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. \n Experience: Minimum of 10 years of progressively responsible professional experience in peacekeeping and peace\u00adbuilding operations in the field of DDR of ex\u00adcombatants, including extensive experience in working on small arms reduction programmes. Detailed knowledge of development process and post\u00adconflict related issues, particularly on the DDR process. Additional experience in developing support strategies for IDPs, refugees, disaffected popu\u00ad lations, children and women in post\u00adconflict situations will be valuable. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60834,14 +60834,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.2: Deputy Chief, DDR Unit (P5\u2013P4)", "Heading3": "Qualifications", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Experience: Minimum of 10 years of progressively responsible professional experience in peacekeeping and peace\u00adbuilding operations in the field of DDR of ex\u00adcombatants, including extensive experience in working on small arms reduction programmes.", + "Sentence": "\n Experience: Minimum of 10 years of progressively responsible professional experience in peacekeeping and peace\u00adbuilding operations in the field of DDR of ex\u00adcombatants, including extensive experience in working on small arms reduction programmes.", "newParagraph": "education advanced university degree master equivalent social science manage ment economics business administration international development relevant field n experience minimum 10 year progressively responsible professional experience peacekeeping peace building operation field ddr ex combatant including extensive experience working small arm reduction programme detailed knowledge development process post conflict related issue particularly ddr process additional experience developing support strategy idp refugee disaffected popu lations child woman post conflict situation valuable n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "ProcessedSent": "n experience minimum 10 year progressively responsible professional experience peacekeeping peace building operation field ddr ex combatant including extensive experience working small arm reduction programme", "SentID": 3379 }, { "ParagraphID": 1119, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree (Masters or equivalent) in social sciences, manage\u00ad ment, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. \\n Experience: Minimum of 10 years of progressively responsible professional experience in peacekeeping and peace\u00adbuilding operations in the field of DDR of ex\u00adcombatants, including extensive experience in working on small arms reduction programmes. Detailed knowledge of development process and post\u00adconflict related issues, particularly on the DDR process. Additional experience in developing support strategies for IDPs, refugees, disaffected popu\u00ad lations, children and women in post\u00adconflict situations will be valuable. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree (Masters or equivalent) in social sciences, manage\u00ad ment, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. \n Experience: Minimum of 10 years of progressively responsible professional experience in peacekeeping and peace\u00adbuilding operations in the field of DDR of ex\u00adcombatants, including extensive experience in working on small arms reduction programmes. Detailed knowledge of development process and post\u00adconflict related issues, particularly on the DDR process. Additional experience in developing support strategies for IDPs, refugees, disaffected popu\u00ad lations, children and women in post\u00adconflict situations will be valuable. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60859,7 +60859,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1119, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree (Masters or equivalent) in social sciences, manage\u00ad ment, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. \\n Experience: Minimum of 10 years of progressively responsible professional experience in peacekeeping and peace\u00adbuilding operations in the field of DDR of ex\u00adcombatants, including extensive experience in working on small arms reduction programmes. Detailed knowledge of development process and post\u00adconflict related issues, particularly on the DDR process. Additional experience in developing support strategies for IDPs, refugees, disaffected popu\u00ad lations, children and women in post\u00adconflict situations will be valuable. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree (Masters or equivalent) in social sciences, manage\u00ad ment, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. \n Experience: Minimum of 10 years of progressively responsible professional experience in peacekeeping and peace\u00adbuilding operations in the field of DDR of ex\u00adcombatants, including extensive experience in working on small arms reduction programmes. Detailed knowledge of development process and post\u00adconflict related issues, particularly on the DDR process. Additional experience in developing support strategies for IDPs, refugees, disaffected popu\u00ad lations, children and women in post\u00adconflict situations will be valuable. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60877,7 +60877,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1119, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree (Masters or equivalent) in social sciences, manage\u00ad ment, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. \\n Experience: Minimum of 10 years of progressively responsible professional experience in peacekeeping and peace\u00adbuilding operations in the field of DDR of ex\u00adcombatants, including extensive experience in working on small arms reduction programmes. Detailed knowledge of development process and post\u00adconflict related issues, particularly on the DDR process. Additional experience in developing support strategies for IDPs, refugees, disaffected popu\u00ad lations, children and women in post\u00adconflict situations will be valuable. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree (Masters or equivalent) in social sciences, manage\u00ad ment, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. \n Experience: Minimum of 10 years of progressively responsible professional experience in peacekeeping and peace\u00adbuilding operations in the field of DDR of ex\u00adcombatants, including extensive experience in working on small arms reduction programmes. Detailed knowledge of development process and post\u00adconflict related issues, particularly on the DDR process. Additional experience in developing support strategies for IDPs, refugees, disaffected popu\u00ad lations, children and women in post\u00adconflict situations will be valuable. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60888,7 +60888,7 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.2: Deputy Chief, DDR Unit (P5\u2013P4)", "Heading3": "Qualifications", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Sentence": "\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "newParagraph": "education advanced university degree master equivalent social science manage ment economics business administration international development relevant field n experience minimum 10 year progressively responsible professional experience peacekeeping peace building operation field ddr ex combatant including extensive experience working small arm reduction programme detailed knowledge development process post conflict related issue particularly ddr process additional experience developing support strategy idp refugee disaffected popu lations child woman post conflict situation valuable n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "ProcessedSent": "n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "SentID": 3382 @@ -60949,7 +60949,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1122, - "Paragraph": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Senior Military DDR Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n support the overall DDR plan, specifically in the strategic, functional and operational areas relating to disarmament and demobilization; \\n direct and supervise all military personnel appointed to the DDR Unit; \\n ensure direct liaison and coordination between DDR operations and the military head\u00ad quarters, specifically the Joint Operations Centre; \\n ensure accurate and timely reporting of security matters, particularly those likely to affect DDR tasks; \\n provide direct liaison, advice and expertise to the Force Commander relating to DDR matters; \\n assist Chief of DDR Unit in the preparation and planning of the DDR strategy, provid\u00ad ing military advice, coordination between sub\u00adunits and civilian agencies; \\n liaise with other mission military elements, as well as national military commanders and, where appropriate, those in national DDR bodies; \\n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of weapons collection, registration, storage and disposal\/destruction, etc.; \\n coordinate and facilitate the use of mission forces for the potential construction or development of DDR facilities \u2014 camps, reception centres, pick\u00adup points, etc. As required, facilitate security of such locations; \\n assist in the coordination and development of DDR Unit mechanisms for receiving and recording group profile information, liaise on this subject with the military information unit; \\n liaise with military operations for the deployment of military observers in support of DDR tasks; \\n be prepared to support security sector reform linkages and activities in future mission planning; \\n undertake such other tasks as may be reasonably requested by the Force Commander and Chief of DDR Unit in relation to DDR activities. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Senior Military DDR Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n support the overall DDR plan, specifically in the strategic, functional and operational areas relating to disarmament and demobilization; \n direct and supervise all military personnel appointed to the DDR Unit; \n ensure direct liaison and coordination between DDR operations and the military head\u00ad quarters, specifically the Joint Operations Centre; \n ensure accurate and timely reporting of security matters, particularly those likely to affect DDR tasks; \n provide direct liaison, advice and expertise to the Force Commander relating to DDR matters; \n assist Chief of DDR Unit in the preparation and planning of the DDR strategy, provid\u00ad ing military advice, coordination between sub\u00adunits and civilian agencies; \n liaise with other mission military elements, as well as national military commanders and, where appropriate, those in national DDR bodies; \n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of weapons collection, registration, storage and disposal\/destruction, etc.; \n coordinate and facilitate the use of mission forces for the potential construction or development of DDR facilities \u2014 camps, reception centres, pick\u00adup points, etc. As required, facilitate security of such locations; \n assist in the coordination and development of DDR Unit mechanisms for receiving and recording group profile information, liaise on this subject with the military information unit; \n liaise with military operations for the deployment of military observers in support of DDR tasks; \n be prepared to support security sector reform linkages and activities in future mission planning; \n undertake such other tasks as may be reasonably requested by the Force Commander and Chief of DDR Unit in relation to DDR activities. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60960,14 +60960,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.3: Senior Military DDR Officer", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Senior Military DDR Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate.", + "Sentence": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Senior Military DDR Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate.", "newParagraph": "accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit senior military ddr officer responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn support overall ddr plan specifically strategic functional operational area relating disarmament demobilization n direct supervise military personnel appointed ddr unit n ensure direct liaison coordination ddr operation military head quarter specifically joint operation centre n ensure accurate timely reporting security matter particularly likely affect ddr task n provide direct liaison advice expertise force commander relating ddr matter n assist chief ddr unit preparation planning ddr strategy provid ing military advice coordination sub unit civilian agency n liaise mission military element well national military commander appropriate national ddr body n supervise development appropriate mechanism system registration tracking weapon collection registration storage disposaldestruction etc n coordinate facilitate use mission force potential construction development ddr facility camp reception centre pick point etc required facilitate security location n assist coordination development ddr unit mechanism receiving recording group profile information liaise subject military information unit n liaise military operation deployment military observer support ddr task n prepared support security sector reform linkage activity future mission planning n undertake task may reasonably requested force commander chief ddr unit relation ddr activity nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit senior military ddr officer responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate", "SentID": 3386 }, { "ParagraphID": 1122, - "Paragraph": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Senior Military DDR Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n support the overall DDR plan, specifically in the strategic, functional and operational areas relating to disarmament and demobilization; \\n direct and supervise all military personnel appointed to the DDR Unit; \\n ensure direct liaison and coordination between DDR operations and the military head\u00ad quarters, specifically the Joint Operations Centre; \\n ensure accurate and timely reporting of security matters, particularly those likely to affect DDR tasks; \\n provide direct liaison, advice and expertise to the Force Commander relating to DDR matters; \\n assist Chief of DDR Unit in the preparation and planning of the DDR strategy, provid\u00ad ing military advice, coordination between sub\u00adunits and civilian agencies; \\n liaise with other mission military elements, as well as national military commanders and, where appropriate, those in national DDR bodies; \\n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of weapons collection, registration, storage and disposal\/destruction, etc.; \\n coordinate and facilitate the use of mission forces for the potential construction or development of DDR facilities \u2014 camps, reception centres, pick\u00adup points, etc. As required, facilitate security of such locations; \\n assist in the coordination and development of DDR Unit mechanisms for receiving and recording group profile information, liaise on this subject with the military information unit; \\n liaise with military operations for the deployment of military observers in support of DDR tasks; \\n be prepared to support security sector reform linkages and activities in future mission planning; \\n undertake such other tasks as may be reasonably requested by the Force Commander and Chief of DDR Unit in relation to DDR activities. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Senior Military DDR Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n support the overall DDR plan, specifically in the strategic, functional and operational areas relating to disarmament and demobilization; \n direct and supervise all military personnel appointed to the DDR Unit; \n ensure direct liaison and coordination between DDR operations and the military head\u00ad quarters, specifically the Joint Operations Centre; \n ensure accurate and timely reporting of security matters, particularly those likely to affect DDR tasks; \n provide direct liaison, advice and expertise to the Force Commander relating to DDR matters; \n assist Chief of DDR Unit in the preparation and planning of the DDR strategy, provid\u00ad ing military advice, coordination between sub\u00adunits and civilian agencies; \n liaise with other mission military elements, as well as national military commanders and, where appropriate, those in national DDR bodies; \n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of weapons collection, registration, storage and disposal\/destruction, etc.; \n coordinate and facilitate the use of mission forces for the potential construction or development of DDR facilities \u2014 camps, reception centres, pick\u00adup points, etc. As required, facilitate security of such locations; \n assist in the coordination and development of DDR Unit mechanisms for receiving and recording group profile information, liaise on this subject with the military information unit; \n liaise with military operations for the deployment of military observers in support of DDR tasks; \n be prepared to support security sector reform linkages and activities in future mission planning; \n undertake such other tasks as may be reasonably requested by the Force Commander and Chief of DDR Unit in relation to DDR activities. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60985,7 +60985,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1122, - "Paragraph": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Senior Military DDR Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n support the overall DDR plan, specifically in the strategic, functional and operational areas relating to disarmament and demobilization; \\n direct and supervise all military personnel appointed to the DDR Unit; \\n ensure direct liaison and coordination between DDR operations and the military head\u00ad quarters, specifically the Joint Operations Centre; \\n ensure accurate and timely reporting of security matters, particularly those likely to affect DDR tasks; \\n provide direct liaison, advice and expertise to the Force Commander relating to DDR matters; \\n assist Chief of DDR Unit in the preparation and planning of the DDR strategy, provid\u00ad ing military advice, coordination between sub\u00adunits and civilian agencies; \\n liaise with other mission military elements, as well as national military commanders and, where appropriate, those in national DDR bodies; \\n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of weapons collection, registration, storage and disposal\/destruction, etc.; \\n coordinate and facilitate the use of mission forces for the potential construction or development of DDR facilities \u2014 camps, reception centres, pick\u00adup points, etc. As required, facilitate security of such locations; \\n assist in the coordination and development of DDR Unit mechanisms for receiving and recording group profile information, liaise on this subject with the military information unit; \\n liaise with military operations for the deployment of military observers in support of DDR tasks; \\n be prepared to support security sector reform linkages and activities in future mission planning; \\n undertake such other tasks as may be reasonably requested by the Force Commander and Chief of DDR Unit in relation to DDR activities. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Senior Military DDR Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n support the overall DDR plan, specifically in the strategic, functional and operational areas relating to disarmament and demobilization; \n direct and supervise all military personnel appointed to the DDR Unit; \n ensure direct liaison and coordination between DDR operations and the military head\u00ad quarters, specifically the Joint Operations Centre; \n ensure accurate and timely reporting of security matters, particularly those likely to affect DDR tasks; \n provide direct liaison, advice and expertise to the Force Commander relating to DDR matters; \n assist Chief of DDR Unit in the preparation and planning of the DDR strategy, provid\u00ad ing military advice, coordination between sub\u00adunits and civilian agencies; \n liaise with other mission military elements, as well as national military commanders and, where appropriate, those in national DDR bodies; \n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of weapons collection, registration, storage and disposal\/destruction, etc.; \n coordinate and facilitate the use of mission forces for the potential construction or development of DDR facilities \u2014 camps, reception centres, pick\u00adup points, etc. As required, facilitate security of such locations; \n assist in the coordination and development of DDR Unit mechanisms for receiving and recording group profile information, liaise on this subject with the military information unit; \n liaise with military operations for the deployment of military observers in support of DDR tasks; \n be prepared to support security sector reform linkages and activities in future mission planning; \n undertake such other tasks as may be reasonably requested by the Force Commander and Chief of DDR Unit in relation to DDR activities. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -60996,14 +60996,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.3: Senior Military DDR Officer", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n support the overall DDR plan, specifically in the strategic, functional and operational areas relating to disarmament and demobilization; \\n direct and supervise all military personnel appointed to the DDR Unit; \\n ensure direct liaison and coordination between DDR operations and the military head\u00ad quarters, specifically the Joint Operations Centre; \\n ensure accurate and timely reporting of security matters, particularly those likely to affect DDR tasks; \\n provide direct liaison, advice and expertise to the Force Commander relating to DDR matters; \\n assist Chief of DDR Unit in the preparation and planning of the DDR strategy, provid\u00ad ing military advice, coordination between sub\u00adunits and civilian agencies; \\n liaise with other mission military elements, as well as national military commanders and, where appropriate, those in national DDR bodies; \\n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of weapons collection, registration, storage and disposal\/destruction, etc.", + "Sentence": "\n\n support the overall DDR plan, specifically in the strategic, functional and operational areas relating to disarmament and demobilization; \n direct and supervise all military personnel appointed to the DDR Unit; \n ensure direct liaison and coordination between DDR operations and the military head\u00ad quarters, specifically the Joint Operations Centre; \n ensure accurate and timely reporting of security matters, particularly those likely to affect DDR tasks; \n provide direct liaison, advice and expertise to the Force Commander relating to DDR matters; \n assist Chief of DDR Unit in the preparation and planning of the DDR strategy, provid\u00ad ing military advice, coordination between sub\u00adunits and civilian agencies; \n liaise with other mission military elements, as well as national military commanders and, where appropriate, those in national DDR bodies; \n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of weapons collection, registration, storage and disposal\/destruction, etc.", "newParagraph": "accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit senior military ddr officer responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn support overall ddr plan specifically strategic functional operational area relating disarmament demobilization n direct supervise military personnel appointed ddr unit n ensure direct liaison coordination ddr operation military head quarter specifically joint operation centre n ensure accurate timely reporting security matter particularly likely affect ddr task n provide direct liaison advice expertise force commander relating ddr matter n assist chief ddr unit preparation planning ddr strategy provid ing military advice coordination sub unit civilian agency n liaise mission military element well national military commander appropriate national ddr body n supervise development appropriate mechanism system registration tracking weapon collection registration storage disposaldestruction etc n coordinate facilitate use mission force potential construction development ddr facility camp reception centre pick point etc required facilitate security location n assist coordination development ddr unit mechanism receiving recording group profile information liaise subject military information unit n liaise military operation deployment military observer support ddr task n prepared support security sector reform linkage activity future mission planning n undertake task may reasonably requested force commander chief ddr unit relation ddr activity nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "nn support overall ddr plan specifically strategic functional operational area relating disarmament demobilization n direct supervise military personnel appointed ddr unit n ensure direct liaison coordination ddr operation military head quarter specifically joint operation centre n ensure accurate timely reporting security matter particularly likely affect ddr task n provide direct liaison advice expertise force commander relating ddr matter n assist chief ddr unit preparation planning ddr strategy provid ing military advice coordination sub unit civilian agency n liaise mission military element well national military commander appropriate national ddr body n supervise development appropriate mechanism system registration tracking weapon collection registration storage disposaldestruction etc", "SentID": 3388 }, { "ParagraphID": 1122, - "Paragraph": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Senior Military DDR Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n support the overall DDR plan, specifically in the strategic, functional and operational areas relating to disarmament and demobilization; \\n direct and supervise all military personnel appointed to the DDR Unit; \\n ensure direct liaison and coordination between DDR operations and the military head\u00ad quarters, specifically the Joint Operations Centre; \\n ensure accurate and timely reporting of security matters, particularly those likely to affect DDR tasks; \\n provide direct liaison, advice and expertise to the Force Commander relating to DDR matters; \\n assist Chief of DDR Unit in the preparation and planning of the DDR strategy, provid\u00ad ing military advice, coordination between sub\u00adunits and civilian agencies; \\n liaise with other mission military elements, as well as national military commanders and, where appropriate, those in national DDR bodies; \\n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of weapons collection, registration, storage and disposal\/destruction, etc.; \\n coordinate and facilitate the use of mission forces for the potential construction or development of DDR facilities \u2014 camps, reception centres, pick\u00adup points, etc. As required, facilitate security of such locations; \\n assist in the coordination and development of DDR Unit mechanisms for receiving and recording group profile information, liaise on this subject with the military information unit; \\n liaise with military operations for the deployment of military observers in support of DDR tasks; \\n be prepared to support security sector reform linkages and activities in future mission planning; \\n undertake such other tasks as may be reasonably requested by the Force Commander and Chief of DDR Unit in relation to DDR activities. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Senior Military DDR Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n support the overall DDR plan, specifically in the strategic, functional and operational areas relating to disarmament and demobilization; \n direct and supervise all military personnel appointed to the DDR Unit; \n ensure direct liaison and coordination between DDR operations and the military head\u00ad quarters, specifically the Joint Operations Centre; \n ensure accurate and timely reporting of security matters, particularly those likely to affect DDR tasks; \n provide direct liaison, advice and expertise to the Force Commander relating to DDR matters; \n assist Chief of DDR Unit in the preparation and planning of the DDR strategy, provid\u00ad ing military advice, coordination between sub\u00adunits and civilian agencies; \n liaise with other mission military elements, as well as national military commanders and, where appropriate, those in national DDR bodies; \n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of weapons collection, registration, storage and disposal\/destruction, etc.; \n coordinate and facilitate the use of mission forces for the potential construction or development of DDR facilities \u2014 camps, reception centres, pick\u00adup points, etc. As required, facilitate security of such locations; \n assist in the coordination and development of DDR Unit mechanisms for receiving and recording group profile information, liaise on this subject with the military information unit; \n liaise with military operations for the deployment of military observers in support of DDR tasks; \n be prepared to support security sector reform linkages and activities in future mission planning; \n undertake such other tasks as may be reasonably requested by the Force Commander and Chief of DDR Unit in relation to DDR activities. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61014,14 +61014,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.3: Senior Military DDR Officer", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "; \\n coordinate and facilitate the use of mission forces for the potential construction or development of DDR facilities \u2014 camps, reception centres, pick\u00adup points, etc.", + "Sentence": "; \n coordinate and facilitate the use of mission forces for the potential construction or development of DDR facilities \u2014 camps, reception centres, pick\u00adup points, etc.", "newParagraph": "accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit senior military ddr officer responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn support overall ddr plan specifically strategic functional operational area relating disarmament demobilization n direct supervise military personnel appointed ddr unit n ensure direct liaison coordination ddr operation military head quarter specifically joint operation centre n ensure accurate timely reporting security matter particularly likely affect ddr task n provide direct liaison advice expertise force commander relating ddr matter n assist chief ddr unit preparation planning ddr strategy provid ing military advice coordination sub unit civilian agency n liaise mission military element well national military commander appropriate national ddr body n supervise development appropriate mechanism system registration tracking weapon collection registration storage disposaldestruction etc n coordinate facilitate use mission force potential construction development ddr facility camp reception centre pick point etc required facilitate security location n assist coordination development ddr unit mechanism receiving recording group profile information liaise subject military information unit n liaise military operation deployment military observer support ddr task n prepared support security sector reform linkage activity future mission planning n undertake task may reasonably requested force commander chief ddr unit relation ddr activity nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": " n coordinate facilitate use mission force potential construction development ddr facility camp reception centre pick point etc", "SentID": 3389 }, { "ParagraphID": 1122, - "Paragraph": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Senior Military DDR Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n support the overall DDR plan, specifically in the strategic, functional and operational areas relating to disarmament and demobilization; \\n direct and supervise all military personnel appointed to the DDR Unit; \\n ensure direct liaison and coordination between DDR operations and the military head\u00ad quarters, specifically the Joint Operations Centre; \\n ensure accurate and timely reporting of security matters, particularly those likely to affect DDR tasks; \\n provide direct liaison, advice and expertise to the Force Commander relating to DDR matters; \\n assist Chief of DDR Unit in the preparation and planning of the DDR strategy, provid\u00ad ing military advice, coordination between sub\u00adunits and civilian agencies; \\n liaise with other mission military elements, as well as national military commanders and, where appropriate, those in national DDR bodies; \\n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of weapons collection, registration, storage and disposal\/destruction, etc.; \\n coordinate and facilitate the use of mission forces for the potential construction or development of DDR facilities \u2014 camps, reception centres, pick\u00adup points, etc. As required, facilitate security of such locations; \\n assist in the coordination and development of DDR Unit mechanisms for receiving and recording group profile information, liaise on this subject with the military information unit; \\n liaise with military operations for the deployment of military observers in support of DDR tasks; \\n be prepared to support security sector reform linkages and activities in future mission planning; \\n undertake such other tasks as may be reasonably requested by the Force Commander and Chief of DDR Unit in relation to DDR activities. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Senior Military DDR Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n support the overall DDR plan, specifically in the strategic, functional and operational areas relating to disarmament and demobilization; \n direct and supervise all military personnel appointed to the DDR Unit; \n ensure direct liaison and coordination between DDR operations and the military head\u00ad quarters, specifically the Joint Operations Centre; \n ensure accurate and timely reporting of security matters, particularly those likely to affect DDR tasks; \n provide direct liaison, advice and expertise to the Force Commander relating to DDR matters; \n assist Chief of DDR Unit in the preparation and planning of the DDR strategy, provid\u00ad ing military advice, coordination between sub\u00adunits and civilian agencies; \n liaise with other mission military elements, as well as national military commanders and, where appropriate, those in national DDR bodies; \n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of weapons collection, registration, storage and disposal\/destruction, etc.; \n coordinate and facilitate the use of mission forces for the potential construction or development of DDR facilities \u2014 camps, reception centres, pick\u00adup points, etc. As required, facilitate security of such locations; \n assist in the coordination and development of DDR Unit mechanisms for receiving and recording group profile information, liaise on this subject with the military information unit; \n liaise with military operations for the deployment of military observers in support of DDR tasks; \n be prepared to support security sector reform linkages and activities in future mission planning; \n undertake such other tasks as may be reasonably requested by the Force Commander and Chief of DDR Unit in relation to DDR activities. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61032,14 +61032,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.3: Senior Military DDR Officer", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "As required, facilitate security of such locations; \\n assist in the coordination and development of DDR Unit mechanisms for receiving and recording group profile information, liaise on this subject with the military information unit; \\n liaise with military operations for the deployment of military observers in support of DDR tasks; \\n be prepared to support security sector reform linkages and activities in future mission planning; \\n undertake such other tasks as may be reasonably requested by the Force Commander and Chief of DDR Unit in relation to DDR activities.", + "Sentence": "As required, facilitate security of such locations; \n assist in the coordination and development of DDR Unit mechanisms for receiving and recording group profile information, liaise on this subject with the military information unit; \n liaise with military operations for the deployment of military observers in support of DDR tasks; \n be prepared to support security sector reform linkages and activities in future mission planning; \n undertake such other tasks as may be reasonably requested by the Force Commander and Chief of DDR Unit in relation to DDR activities.", "newParagraph": "accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit senior military ddr officer responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn support overall ddr plan specifically strategic functional operational area relating disarmament demobilization n direct supervise military personnel appointed ddr unit n ensure direct liaison coordination ddr operation military head quarter specifically joint operation centre n ensure accurate timely reporting security matter particularly likely affect ddr task n provide direct liaison advice expertise force commander relating ddr matter n assist chief ddr unit preparation planning ddr strategy provid ing military advice coordination sub unit civilian agency n liaise mission military element well national military commander appropriate national ddr body n supervise development appropriate mechanism system registration tracking weapon collection registration storage disposaldestruction etc n coordinate facilitate use mission force potential construction development ddr facility camp reception centre pick point etc required facilitate security location n assist coordination development ddr unit mechanism receiving recording group profile information liaise subject military information unit n liaise military operation deployment military observer support ddr task n prepared support security sector reform linkage activity future mission planning n undertake task may reasonably requested force commander chief ddr unit relation ddr activity nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "required facilitate security location n assist coordination development ddr unit mechanism receiving recording group profile information liaise subject military information unit n liaise military operation deployment military observer support ddr task n prepared support security sector reform linkage activity future mission planning n undertake task may reasonably requested force commander chief ddr unit relation ddr activity", "SentID": 3390 }, { "ParagraphID": 1122, - "Paragraph": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Senior Military DDR Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n support the overall DDR plan, specifically in the strategic, functional and operational areas relating to disarmament and demobilization; \\n direct and supervise all military personnel appointed to the DDR Unit; \\n ensure direct liaison and coordination between DDR operations and the military head\u00ad quarters, specifically the Joint Operations Centre; \\n ensure accurate and timely reporting of security matters, particularly those likely to affect DDR tasks; \\n provide direct liaison, advice and expertise to the Force Commander relating to DDR matters; \\n assist Chief of DDR Unit in the preparation and planning of the DDR strategy, provid\u00ad ing military advice, coordination between sub\u00adunits and civilian agencies; \\n liaise with other mission military elements, as well as national military commanders and, where appropriate, those in national DDR bodies; \\n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of weapons collection, registration, storage and disposal\/destruction, etc.; \\n coordinate and facilitate the use of mission forces for the potential construction or development of DDR facilities \u2014 camps, reception centres, pick\u00adup points, etc. As required, facilitate security of such locations; \\n assist in the coordination and development of DDR Unit mechanisms for receiving and recording group profile information, liaise on this subject with the military information unit; \\n liaise with military operations for the deployment of military observers in support of DDR tasks; \\n be prepared to support security sector reform linkages and activities in future mission planning; \\n undertake such other tasks as may be reasonably requested by the Force Commander and Chief of DDR Unit in relation to DDR activities. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Senior Military DDR Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n support the overall DDR plan, specifically in the strategic, functional and operational areas relating to disarmament and demobilization; \n direct and supervise all military personnel appointed to the DDR Unit; \n ensure direct liaison and coordination between DDR operations and the military head\u00ad quarters, specifically the Joint Operations Centre; \n ensure accurate and timely reporting of security matters, particularly those likely to affect DDR tasks; \n provide direct liaison, advice and expertise to the Force Commander relating to DDR matters; \n assist Chief of DDR Unit in the preparation and planning of the DDR strategy, provid\u00ad ing military advice, coordination between sub\u00adunits and civilian agencies; \n liaise with other mission military elements, as well as national military commanders and, where appropriate, those in national DDR bodies; \n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of weapons collection, registration, storage and disposal\/destruction, etc.; \n coordinate and facilitate the use of mission forces for the potential construction or development of DDR facilities \u2014 camps, reception centres, pick\u00adup points, etc. As required, facilitate security of such locations; \n assist in the coordination and development of DDR Unit mechanisms for receiving and recording group profile information, liaise on this subject with the military information unit; \n liaise with military operations for the deployment of military observers in support of DDR tasks; \n be prepared to support security sector reform linkages and activities in future mission planning; \n undertake such other tasks as may be reasonably requested by the Force Commander and Chief of DDR Unit in relation to DDR activities. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61050,14 +61050,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.3: Senior Military DDR Officer", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "newParagraph": "accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit senior military ddr officer responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn support overall ddr plan specifically strategic functional operational area relating disarmament demobilization n direct supervise military personnel appointed ddr unit n ensure direct liaison coordination ddr operation military head quarter specifically joint operation centre n ensure accurate timely reporting security matter particularly likely affect ddr task n provide direct liaison advice expertise force commander relating ddr matter n assist chief ddr unit preparation planning ddr strategy provid ing military advice coordination sub unit civilian agency n liaise mission military element well national military commander appropriate national ddr body n supervise development appropriate mechanism system registration tracking weapon collection registration storage disposaldestruction etc n coordinate facilitate use mission force potential construction development ddr facility camp reception centre pick point etc required facilitate security location n assist coordination development ddr unit mechanism receiving recording group profile information liaise subject military information unit n liaise military operation deployment military observer support ddr task n prepared support security sector reform linkage activity future mission planning n undertake task may reasonably requested force commander chief ddr unit relation ddr activity nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "SentID": 3391 }, { "ParagraphID": 1123, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Should be formally staff trained and command qualified. Ideally experi\u00ad enced in other peacekeeping operations, specifically in relation to DDR activities. The selected candidate should be well acquainted with regional and subregional conflict\/political issues and ideally have knowledge of the specific mission background. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective command and supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. Must be capable of working within a multi\u00adagency integrated team. The candidate would benefit from CIMIC experience and should have an understanding of the nature, capacities and limitations of non\u00adUN agencies, NGOs, etc. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective work\u00ad ing relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Should be formally staff trained and command qualified. Ideally experi\u00ad enced in other peacekeeping operations, specifically in relation to DDR activities. The selected candidate should be well acquainted with regional and subregional conflict\/political issues and ideally have knowledge of the specific mission background. \n Managing performance: Proven effective command and supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. Must be capable of working within a multi\u00adagency integrated team. The candidate would benefit from CIMIC experience and should have an understanding of the nature, capacities and limitations of non\u00adUN agencies, NGOs, etc. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective work\u00ad ing relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61075,7 +61075,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1123, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Should be formally staff trained and command qualified. Ideally experi\u00ad enced in other peacekeeping operations, specifically in relation to DDR activities. The selected candidate should be well acquainted with regional and subregional conflict\/political issues and ideally have knowledge of the specific mission background. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective command and supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. Must be capable of working within a multi\u00adagency integrated team. The candidate would benefit from CIMIC experience and should have an understanding of the nature, capacities and limitations of non\u00adUN agencies, NGOs, etc. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective work\u00ad ing relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Should be formally staff trained and command qualified. Ideally experi\u00ad enced in other peacekeeping operations, specifically in relation to DDR activities. The selected candidate should be well acquainted with regional and subregional conflict\/political issues and ideally have knowledge of the specific mission background. \n Managing performance: Proven effective command and supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. Must be capable of working within a multi\u00adagency integrated team. The candidate would benefit from CIMIC experience and should have an understanding of the nature, capacities and limitations of non\u00adUN agencies, NGOs, etc. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective work\u00ad ing relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61093,7 +61093,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1123, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Should be formally staff trained and command qualified. Ideally experi\u00ad enced in other peacekeeping operations, specifically in relation to DDR activities. The selected candidate should be well acquainted with regional and subregional conflict\/political issues and ideally have knowledge of the specific mission background. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective command and supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. Must be capable of working within a multi\u00adagency integrated team. The candidate would benefit from CIMIC experience and should have an understanding of the nature, capacities and limitations of non\u00adUN agencies, NGOs, etc. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective work\u00ad ing relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Should be formally staff trained and command qualified. Ideally experi\u00ad enced in other peacekeeping operations, specifically in relation to DDR activities. The selected candidate should be well acquainted with regional and subregional conflict\/political issues and ideally have knowledge of the specific mission background. \n Managing performance: Proven effective command and supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. Must be capable of working within a multi\u00adagency integrated team. The candidate would benefit from CIMIC experience and should have an understanding of the nature, capacities and limitations of non\u00adUN agencies, NGOs, etc. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective work\u00ad ing relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61111,7 +61111,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1123, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Should be formally staff trained and command qualified. Ideally experi\u00ad enced in other peacekeeping operations, specifically in relation to DDR activities. The selected candidate should be well acquainted with regional and subregional conflict\/political issues and ideally have knowledge of the specific mission background. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective command and supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. Must be capable of working within a multi\u00adagency integrated team. The candidate would benefit from CIMIC experience and should have an understanding of the nature, capacities and limitations of non\u00adUN agencies, NGOs, etc. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective work\u00ad ing relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Should be formally staff trained and command qualified. Ideally experi\u00ad enced in other peacekeeping operations, specifically in relation to DDR activities. The selected candidate should be well acquainted with regional and subregional conflict\/political issues and ideally have knowledge of the specific mission background. \n Managing performance: Proven effective command and supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. Must be capable of working within a multi\u00adagency integrated team. The candidate would benefit from CIMIC experience and should have an understanding of the nature, capacities and limitations of non\u00adUN agencies, NGOs, etc. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective work\u00ad ing relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61122,14 +61122,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.3: Senior Military DDR Officer", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Managing performance: Proven effective command and supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support.", + "Sentence": "\n Managing performance: Proven effective command and supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support.", "newParagraph": "professionalism formally staff trained command qualified ideally experi enced peacekeeping operation specifically relation ddr activity selected candidate well acquainted regional subregional conflictpolitical issue ideally knowledge specific mission background n managing performance proven effective command supervisory skill ability mentor staff provide guidance support must capable working within multi agency integrated team candidate would benefit cimic experience understanding nature capacity limitation non un agency ngo etc n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness sound judgement decision making skill n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesproblems ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication excellent effective communication verbal written skill includ ing ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective work ing relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n managing performance proven effective command supervisory skill ability mentor staff provide guidance support", "SentID": 3395 }, { "ParagraphID": 1123, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Should be formally staff trained and command qualified. Ideally experi\u00ad enced in other peacekeeping operations, specifically in relation to DDR activities. The selected candidate should be well acquainted with regional and subregional conflict\/political issues and ideally have knowledge of the specific mission background. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective command and supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. Must be capable of working within a multi\u00adagency integrated team. The candidate would benefit from CIMIC experience and should have an understanding of the nature, capacities and limitations of non\u00adUN agencies, NGOs, etc. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective work\u00ad ing relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Should be formally staff trained and command qualified. Ideally experi\u00ad enced in other peacekeeping operations, specifically in relation to DDR activities. The selected candidate should be well acquainted with regional and subregional conflict\/political issues and ideally have knowledge of the specific mission background. \n Managing performance: Proven effective command and supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. Must be capable of working within a multi\u00adagency integrated team. The candidate would benefit from CIMIC experience and should have an understanding of the nature, capacities and limitations of non\u00adUN agencies, NGOs, etc. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective work\u00ad ing relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61147,7 +61147,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1123, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Should be formally staff trained and command qualified. Ideally experi\u00ad enced in other peacekeeping operations, specifically in relation to DDR activities. The selected candidate should be well acquainted with regional and subregional conflict\/political issues and ideally have knowledge of the specific mission background. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective command and supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. Must be capable of working within a multi\u00adagency integrated team. The candidate would benefit from CIMIC experience and should have an understanding of the nature, capacities and limitations of non\u00adUN agencies, NGOs, etc. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective work\u00ad ing relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Should be formally staff trained and command qualified. Ideally experi\u00ad enced in other peacekeeping operations, specifically in relation to DDR activities. The selected candidate should be well acquainted with regional and subregional conflict\/political issues and ideally have knowledge of the specific mission background. \n Managing performance: Proven effective command and supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. Must be capable of working within a multi\u00adagency integrated team. The candidate would benefit from CIMIC experience and should have an understanding of the nature, capacities and limitations of non\u00adUN agencies, NGOs, etc. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective work\u00ad ing relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61165,7 +61165,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1123, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Should be formally staff trained and command qualified. Ideally experi\u00ad enced in other peacekeeping operations, specifically in relation to DDR activities. The selected candidate should be well acquainted with regional and subregional conflict\/political issues and ideally have knowledge of the specific mission background. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective command and supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. Must be capable of working within a multi\u00adagency integrated team. The candidate would benefit from CIMIC experience and should have an understanding of the nature, capacities and limitations of non\u00adUN agencies, NGOs, etc. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective work\u00ad ing relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Should be formally staff trained and command qualified. Ideally experi\u00ad enced in other peacekeeping operations, specifically in relation to DDR activities. The selected candidate should be well acquainted with regional and subregional conflict\/political issues and ideally have knowledge of the specific mission background. \n Managing performance: Proven effective command and supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. Must be capable of working within a multi\u00adagency integrated team. The candidate would benefit from CIMIC experience and should have an understanding of the nature, capacities and limitations of non\u00adUN agencies, NGOs, etc. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective work\u00ad ing relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61176,14 +61176,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.3: Senior Military DDR Officer", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills.", + "Sentence": "\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills.", "newParagraph": "professionalism formally staff trained command qualified ideally experi enced peacekeeping operation specifically relation ddr activity selected candidate well acquainted regional subregional conflictpolitical issue ideally knowledge specific mission background n managing performance proven effective command supervisory skill ability mentor staff provide guidance support must capable working within multi agency integrated team candidate would benefit cimic experience understanding nature capacity limitation non un agency ngo etc n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness sound judgement decision making skill n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesproblems ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication excellent effective communication verbal written skill includ ing ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective work ing relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness sound judgement decision making skill", "SentID": 3398 }, { "ParagraphID": 1123, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Should be formally staff trained and command qualified. Ideally experi\u00ad enced in other peacekeeping operations, specifically in relation to DDR activities. The selected candidate should be well acquainted with regional and subregional conflict\/political issues and ideally have knowledge of the specific mission background. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective command and supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. Must be capable of working within a multi\u00adagency integrated team. The candidate would benefit from CIMIC experience and should have an understanding of the nature, capacities and limitations of non\u00adUN agencies, NGOs, etc. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective work\u00ad ing relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Should be formally staff trained and command qualified. Ideally experi\u00ad enced in other peacekeeping operations, specifically in relation to DDR activities. The selected candidate should be well acquainted with regional and subregional conflict\/political issues and ideally have knowledge of the specific mission background. \n Managing performance: Proven effective command and supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. Must be capable of working within a multi\u00adagency integrated team. The candidate would benefit from CIMIC experience and should have an understanding of the nature, capacities and limitations of non\u00adUN agencies, NGOs, etc. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective work\u00ad ing relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61194,14 +61194,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.3: Senior Military DDR Officer", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives.", + "Sentence": "\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives.", "newParagraph": "professionalism formally staff trained command qualified ideally experi enced peacekeeping operation specifically relation ddr activity selected candidate well acquainted regional subregional conflictpolitical issue ideally knowledge specific mission background n managing performance proven effective command supervisory skill ability mentor staff provide guidance support must capable working within multi agency integrated team candidate would benefit cimic experience understanding nature capacity limitation non un agency ngo etc n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness sound judgement decision making skill n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesproblems ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication excellent effective communication verbal written skill includ ing ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective work ing relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesproblems ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative", "SentID": 3399 }, { "ParagraphID": 1123, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Should be formally staff trained and command qualified. Ideally experi\u00ad enced in other peacekeeping operations, specifically in relation to DDR activities. The selected candidate should be well acquainted with regional and subregional conflict\/political issues and ideally have knowledge of the specific mission background. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective command and supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. Must be capable of working within a multi\u00adagency integrated team. The candidate would benefit from CIMIC experience and should have an understanding of the nature, capacities and limitations of non\u00adUN agencies, NGOs, etc. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective work\u00ad ing relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Should be formally staff trained and command qualified. Ideally experi\u00ad enced in other peacekeeping operations, specifically in relation to DDR activities. The selected candidate should be well acquainted with regional and subregional conflict\/political issues and ideally have knowledge of the specific mission background. \n Managing performance: Proven effective command and supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. Must be capable of working within a multi\u00adagency integrated team. The candidate would benefit from CIMIC experience and should have an understanding of the nature, capacities and limitations of non\u00adUN agencies, NGOs, etc. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective work\u00ad ing relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61212,14 +61212,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.3: Senior Military DDR Officer", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs.", + "Sentence": "\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs.", "newParagraph": "professionalism formally staff trained command qualified ideally experi enced peacekeeping operation specifically relation ddr activity selected candidate well acquainted regional subregional conflictpolitical issue ideally knowledge specific mission background n managing performance proven effective command supervisory skill ability mentor staff provide guidance support must capable working within multi agency integrated team candidate would benefit cimic experience understanding nature capacity limitation non un agency ngo etc n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness sound judgement decision making skill n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesproblems ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication excellent effective communication verbal written skill includ ing ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective work ing relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need", "SentID": 3400 }, { "ParagraphID": 1123, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Should be formally staff trained and command qualified. Ideally experi\u00ad enced in other peacekeeping operations, specifically in relation to DDR activities. The selected candidate should be well acquainted with regional and subregional conflict\/political issues and ideally have knowledge of the specific mission background. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective command and supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. Must be capable of working within a multi\u00adagency integrated team. The candidate would benefit from CIMIC experience and should have an understanding of the nature, capacities and limitations of non\u00adUN agencies, NGOs, etc. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective work\u00ad ing relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Should be formally staff trained and command qualified. Ideally experi\u00ad enced in other peacekeeping operations, specifically in relation to DDR activities. The selected candidate should be well acquainted with regional and subregional conflict\/political issues and ideally have knowledge of the specific mission background. \n Managing performance: Proven effective command and supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. Must be capable of working within a multi\u00adagency integrated team. The candidate would benefit from CIMIC experience and should have an understanding of the nature, capacities and limitations of non\u00adUN agencies, NGOs, etc. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective work\u00ad ing relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61230,14 +61230,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.3: Senior Military DDR Officer", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials.", + "Sentence": "\n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials.", "newParagraph": "professionalism formally staff trained command qualified ideally experi enced peacekeeping operation specifically relation ddr activity selected candidate well acquainted regional subregional conflictpolitical issue ideally knowledge specific mission background n managing performance proven effective command supervisory skill ability mentor staff provide guidance support must capable working within multi agency integrated team candidate would benefit cimic experience understanding nature capacity limitation non un agency ngo etc n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness sound judgement decision making skill n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesproblems ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication excellent effective communication verbal written skill includ ing ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective work ing relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n communication excellent effective communication verbal written skill includ ing ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official", "SentID": 3401 }, { "ParagraphID": 1123, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Should be formally staff trained and command qualified. Ideally experi\u00ad enced in other peacekeeping operations, specifically in relation to DDR activities. The selected candidate should be well acquainted with regional and subregional conflict\/political issues and ideally have knowledge of the specific mission background. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective command and supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. Must be capable of working within a multi\u00adagency integrated team. The candidate would benefit from CIMIC experience and should have an understanding of the nature, capacities and limitations of non\u00adUN agencies, NGOs, etc. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective work\u00ad ing relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Should be formally staff trained and command qualified. Ideally experi\u00ad enced in other peacekeeping operations, specifically in relation to DDR activities. The selected candidate should be well acquainted with regional and subregional conflict\/political issues and ideally have knowledge of the specific mission background. \n Managing performance: Proven effective command and supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. Must be capable of working within a multi\u00adagency integrated team. The candidate would benefit from CIMIC experience and should have an understanding of the nature, capacities and limitations of non\u00adUN agencies, NGOs, etc. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/problems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective work\u00ad ing relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61248,14 +61248,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.3: Senior Military DDR Officer", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective work\u00ad ing relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Sentence": "\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective work\u00ad ing relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "newParagraph": "professionalism formally staff trained command qualified ideally experi enced peacekeeping operation specifically relation ddr activity selected candidate well acquainted regional subregional conflictpolitical issue ideally knowledge specific mission background n managing performance proven effective command supervisory skill ability mentor staff provide guidance support must capable working within multi agency integrated team candidate would benefit cimic experience understanding nature capacity limitation non un agency ngo etc n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness sound judgement decision making skill n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesproblems ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication excellent effective communication verbal written skill includ ing ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective work ing relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective work ing relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "SentID": 3402 }, { "ParagraphID": 1124, - "Paragraph": "Education and work experience: Graduate of Military Command and Staff College. A minimum of 15 years of progressive responsibility in military command appointments, preferably to include peacekeeping and peace\u00adbuilding operations in the field of DDR of ex\u00adcombatants. Detailed knowledge of development process and post\u00adconflict related issues, particularly on the DDR process. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education and work experience: Graduate of Military Command and Staff College. A minimum of 15 years of progressive responsibility in military command appointments, preferably to include peacekeeping and peace\u00adbuilding operations in the field of DDR of ex\u00adcombatants. Detailed knowledge of development process and post\u00adconflict related issues, particularly on the DDR process. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61273,7 +61273,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1124, - "Paragraph": "Education and work experience: Graduate of Military Command and Staff College. A minimum of 15 years of progressive responsibility in military command appointments, preferably to include peacekeeping and peace\u00adbuilding operations in the field of DDR of ex\u00adcombatants. Detailed knowledge of development process and post\u00adconflict related issues, particularly on the DDR process. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education and work experience: Graduate of Military Command and Staff College. A minimum of 15 years of progressive responsibility in military command appointments, preferably to include peacekeeping and peace\u00adbuilding operations in the field of DDR of ex\u00adcombatants. Detailed knowledge of development process and post\u00adconflict related issues, particularly on the DDR process. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61291,7 +61291,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1124, - "Paragraph": "Education and work experience: Graduate of Military Command and Staff College. A minimum of 15 years of progressive responsibility in military command appointments, preferably to include peacekeeping and peace\u00adbuilding operations in the field of DDR of ex\u00adcombatants. Detailed knowledge of development process and post\u00adconflict related issues, particularly on the DDR process. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education and work experience: Graduate of Military Command and Staff College. A minimum of 15 years of progressive responsibility in military command appointments, preferably to include peacekeeping and peace\u00adbuilding operations in the field of DDR of ex\u00adcombatants. Detailed knowledge of development process and post\u00adconflict related issues, particularly on the DDR process. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61309,7 +61309,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1124, - "Paragraph": "Education and work experience: Graduate of Military Command and Staff College. A minimum of 15 years of progressive responsibility in military command appointments, preferably to include peacekeeping and peace\u00adbuilding operations in the field of DDR of ex\u00adcombatants. Detailed knowledge of development process and post\u00adconflict related issues, particularly on the DDR process. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education and work experience: Graduate of Military Command and Staff College. A minimum of 15 years of progressive responsibility in military command appointments, preferably to include peacekeeping and peace\u00adbuilding operations in the field of DDR of ex\u00adcombatants. Detailed knowledge of development process and post\u00adconflict related issues, particularly on the DDR process. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61320,7 +61320,7 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.3: Senior Military DDR Officer", "Heading3": "Qualifications", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Sentence": "\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "newParagraph": "education work experience graduate military command staff college minimum 15 year progressive responsibility military command appointment preferably include peacekeeping peace building operation field ddr ex combatant detailed knowledge development process post conflict related issue particularly ddr process n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "ProcessedSent": "n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "SentID": 3406 @@ -61345,7 +61345,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1126, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Field Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n be in charge of the overall planning and implementation of the DDR programme in his\/her regional area of responsibility; \\n act as officer in charge of all DDR staff members in the regional office, including the administration and management of funds allocated to achieve DDR programme in the region; \\n be responsible for the day\u00adto\u00adday coordination of DDR operations with other mission components in the regional office and other UN entities; \\n identify and develop synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and inter\u00ad national) in his\/her area of responsibility; \\n provide technical advice and support to regional and local DDR commissions and offices, as appropriate; \\n be responsible for regular reporting on the situation pertaining to the armed forces and groups in his\/her area of responsibility and progress on the implementation of the DDR strategy. Prepare and contribute to the preparation of various reports and documents. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Field Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n be in charge of the overall planning and implementation of the DDR programme in his\/her regional area of responsibility; \n act as officer in charge of all DDR staff members in the regional office, including the administration and management of funds allocated to achieve DDR programme in the region; \n be responsible for the day\u00adto\u00adday coordination of DDR operations with other mission components in the regional office and other UN entities; \n identify and develop synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and inter\u00ad national) in his\/her area of responsibility; \n provide technical advice and support to regional and local DDR commissions and offices, as appropriate; \n be responsible for regular reporting on the situation pertaining to the armed forces and groups in his\/her area of responsibility and progress on the implementation of the DDR strategy. Prepare and contribute to the preparation of various reports and documents. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61363,7 +61363,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1126, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Field Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n be in charge of the overall planning and implementation of the DDR programme in his\/her regional area of responsibility; \\n act as officer in charge of all DDR staff members in the regional office, including the administration and management of funds allocated to achieve DDR programme in the region; \\n be responsible for the day\u00adto\u00adday coordination of DDR operations with other mission components in the regional office and other UN entities; \\n identify and develop synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and inter\u00ad national) in his\/her area of responsibility; \\n provide technical advice and support to regional and local DDR commissions and offices, as appropriate; \\n be responsible for regular reporting on the situation pertaining to the armed forces and groups in his\/her area of responsibility and progress on the implementation of the DDR strategy. Prepare and contribute to the preparation of various reports and documents. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Field Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n be in charge of the overall planning and implementation of the DDR programme in his\/her regional area of responsibility; \n act as officer in charge of all DDR staff members in the regional office, including the administration and management of funds allocated to achieve DDR programme in the region; \n be responsible for the day\u00adto\u00adday coordination of DDR operations with other mission components in the regional office and other UN entities; \n identify and develop synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and inter\u00ad national) in his\/her area of responsibility; \n provide technical advice and support to regional and local DDR commissions and offices, as appropriate; \n be responsible for regular reporting on the situation pertaining to the armed forces and groups in his\/her area of responsibility and progress on the implementation of the DDR strategy. Prepare and contribute to the preparation of various reports and documents. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61381,7 +61381,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1126, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Field Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n be in charge of the overall planning and implementation of the DDR programme in his\/her regional area of responsibility; \\n act as officer in charge of all DDR staff members in the regional office, including the administration and management of funds allocated to achieve DDR programme in the region; \\n be responsible for the day\u00adto\u00adday coordination of DDR operations with other mission components in the regional office and other UN entities; \\n identify and develop synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and inter\u00ad national) in his\/her area of responsibility; \\n provide technical advice and support to regional and local DDR commissions and offices, as appropriate; \\n be responsible for regular reporting on the situation pertaining to the armed forces and groups in his\/her area of responsibility and progress on the implementation of the DDR strategy. Prepare and contribute to the preparation of various reports and documents. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Field Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n be in charge of the overall planning and implementation of the DDR programme in his\/her regional area of responsibility; \n act as officer in charge of all DDR staff members in the regional office, including the administration and management of funds allocated to achieve DDR programme in the region; \n be responsible for the day\u00adto\u00adday coordination of DDR operations with other mission components in the regional office and other UN entities; \n identify and develop synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and inter\u00ad national) in his\/her area of responsibility; \n provide technical advice and support to regional and local DDR commissions and offices, as appropriate; \n be responsible for regular reporting on the situation pertaining to the armed forces and groups in his\/her area of responsibility and progress on the implementation of the DDR strategy. Prepare and contribute to the preparation of various reports and documents. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61392,14 +61392,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.4: DDR Field Officer (P4\u2013P3)", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Field Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate.", + "Sentence": "\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Field Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate.", "newParagraph": "organizational setting reporting relationship position located peace operation depending organizational structure mission location post incumbent may report directly chief ddr unit senior official charge ddr activity field location n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit ddr field officer responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn charge overall planning implementation ddr programme hisher regional area responsibility n act officer charge ddr staff member regional office including administration management fund allocated achieve ddr programme region n responsible day day coordination ddr operation mission component regional office un entity n identify develop synergy partnership actor national inter national hisher area responsibility n provide technical advice support regional local ddr commission office appropriate n responsible regular reporting situation pertaining armed force group hisher area responsibility progress implementation ddr strategy prepare contribute preparation various report document nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit ddr field officer responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate", "SentID": 3410 }, { "ParagraphID": 1126, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Field Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n be in charge of the overall planning and implementation of the DDR programme in his\/her regional area of responsibility; \\n act as officer in charge of all DDR staff members in the regional office, including the administration and management of funds allocated to achieve DDR programme in the region; \\n be responsible for the day\u00adto\u00adday coordination of DDR operations with other mission components in the regional office and other UN entities; \\n identify and develop synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and inter\u00ad national) in his\/her area of responsibility; \\n provide technical advice and support to regional and local DDR commissions and offices, as appropriate; \\n be responsible for regular reporting on the situation pertaining to the armed forces and groups in his\/her area of responsibility and progress on the implementation of the DDR strategy. Prepare and contribute to the preparation of various reports and documents. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Field Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n be in charge of the overall planning and implementation of the DDR programme in his\/her regional area of responsibility; \n act as officer in charge of all DDR staff members in the regional office, including the administration and management of funds allocated to achieve DDR programme in the region; \n be responsible for the day\u00adto\u00adday coordination of DDR operations with other mission components in the regional office and other UN entities; \n identify and develop synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and inter\u00ad national) in his\/her area of responsibility; \n provide technical advice and support to regional and local DDR commissions and offices, as appropriate; \n be responsible for regular reporting on the situation pertaining to the armed forces and groups in his\/her area of responsibility and progress on the implementation of the DDR strategy. Prepare and contribute to the preparation of various reports and documents. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61417,7 +61417,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1126, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Field Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n be in charge of the overall planning and implementation of the DDR programme in his\/her regional area of responsibility; \\n act as officer in charge of all DDR staff members in the regional office, including the administration and management of funds allocated to achieve DDR programme in the region; \\n be responsible for the day\u00adto\u00adday coordination of DDR operations with other mission components in the regional office and other UN entities; \\n identify and develop synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and inter\u00ad national) in his\/her area of responsibility; \\n provide technical advice and support to regional and local DDR commissions and offices, as appropriate; \\n be responsible for regular reporting on the situation pertaining to the armed forces and groups in his\/her area of responsibility and progress on the implementation of the DDR strategy. Prepare and contribute to the preparation of various reports and documents. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Field Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n be in charge of the overall planning and implementation of the DDR programme in his\/her regional area of responsibility; \n act as officer in charge of all DDR staff members in the regional office, including the administration and management of funds allocated to achieve DDR programme in the region; \n be responsible for the day\u00adto\u00adday coordination of DDR operations with other mission components in the regional office and other UN entities; \n identify and develop synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and inter\u00ad national) in his\/her area of responsibility; \n provide technical advice and support to regional and local DDR commissions and offices, as appropriate; \n be responsible for regular reporting on the situation pertaining to the armed forces and groups in his\/her area of responsibility and progress on the implementation of the DDR strategy. Prepare and contribute to the preparation of various reports and documents. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61428,14 +61428,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.4: DDR Field Officer (P4\u2013P3)", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n be in charge of the overall planning and implementation of the DDR programme in his\/her regional area of responsibility; \\n act as officer in charge of all DDR staff members in the regional office, including the administration and management of funds allocated to achieve DDR programme in the region; \\n be responsible for the day\u00adto\u00adday coordination of DDR operations with other mission components in the regional office and other UN entities; \\n identify and develop synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and inter\u00ad national) in his\/her area of responsibility; \\n provide technical advice and support to regional and local DDR commissions and offices, as appropriate; \\n be responsible for regular reporting on the situation pertaining to the armed forces and groups in his\/her area of responsibility and progress on the implementation of the DDR strategy.", + "Sentence": "\n\n be in charge of the overall planning and implementation of the DDR programme in his\/her regional area of responsibility; \n act as officer in charge of all DDR staff members in the regional office, including the administration and management of funds allocated to achieve DDR programme in the region; \n be responsible for the day\u00adto\u00adday coordination of DDR operations with other mission components in the regional office and other UN entities; \n identify and develop synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and inter\u00ad national) in his\/her area of responsibility; \n provide technical advice and support to regional and local DDR commissions and offices, as appropriate; \n be responsible for regular reporting on the situation pertaining to the armed forces and groups in his\/her area of responsibility and progress on the implementation of the DDR strategy.", "newParagraph": "organizational setting reporting relationship position located peace operation depending organizational structure mission location post incumbent may report directly chief ddr unit senior official charge ddr activity field location n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit ddr field officer responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn charge overall planning implementation ddr programme hisher regional area responsibility n act officer charge ddr staff member regional office including administration management fund allocated achieve ddr programme region n responsible day day coordination ddr operation mission component regional office un entity n identify develop synergy partnership actor national inter national hisher area responsibility n provide technical advice support regional local ddr commission office appropriate n responsible regular reporting situation pertaining armed force group hisher area responsibility progress implementation ddr strategy prepare contribute preparation various report document nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "nn charge overall planning implementation ddr programme hisher regional area responsibility n act officer charge ddr staff member regional office including administration management fund allocated achieve ddr programme region n responsible day day coordination ddr operation mission component regional office un entity n identify develop synergy partnership actor national inter national hisher area responsibility n provide technical advice support regional local ddr commission office appropriate n responsible regular reporting situation pertaining armed force group hisher area responsibility progress implementation ddr strategy", "SentID": 3412 }, { "ParagraphID": 1126, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Field Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n be in charge of the overall planning and implementation of the DDR programme in his\/her regional area of responsibility; \\n act as officer in charge of all DDR staff members in the regional office, including the administration and management of funds allocated to achieve DDR programme in the region; \\n be responsible for the day\u00adto\u00adday coordination of DDR operations with other mission components in the regional office and other UN entities; \\n identify and develop synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and inter\u00ad national) in his\/her area of responsibility; \\n provide technical advice and support to regional and local DDR commissions and offices, as appropriate; \\n be responsible for regular reporting on the situation pertaining to the armed forces and groups in his\/her area of responsibility and progress on the implementation of the DDR strategy. Prepare and contribute to the preparation of various reports and documents. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Field Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n be in charge of the overall planning and implementation of the DDR programme in his\/her regional area of responsibility; \n act as officer in charge of all DDR staff members in the regional office, including the administration and management of funds allocated to achieve DDR programme in the region; \n be responsible for the day\u00adto\u00adday coordination of DDR operations with other mission components in the regional office and other UN entities; \n identify and develop synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and inter\u00ad national) in his\/her area of responsibility; \n provide technical advice and support to regional and local DDR commissions and offices, as appropriate; \n be responsible for regular reporting on the situation pertaining to the armed forces and groups in his\/her area of responsibility and progress on the implementation of the DDR strategy. Prepare and contribute to the preparation of various reports and documents. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61453,7 +61453,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1126, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Field Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n be in charge of the overall planning and implementation of the DDR programme in his\/her regional area of responsibility; \\n act as officer in charge of all DDR staff members in the regional office, including the administration and management of funds allocated to achieve DDR programme in the region; \\n be responsible for the day\u00adto\u00adday coordination of DDR operations with other mission components in the regional office and other UN entities; \\n identify and develop synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and inter\u00ad national) in his\/her area of responsibility; \\n provide technical advice and support to regional and local DDR commissions and offices, as appropriate; \\n be responsible for regular reporting on the situation pertaining to the armed forces and groups in his\/her area of responsibility and progress on the implementation of the DDR strategy. Prepare and contribute to the preparation of various reports and documents. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Field Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n be in charge of the overall planning and implementation of the DDR programme in his\/her regional area of responsibility; \n act as officer in charge of all DDR staff members in the regional office, including the administration and management of funds allocated to achieve DDR programme in the region; \n be responsible for the day\u00adto\u00adday coordination of DDR operations with other mission components in the regional office and other UN entities; \n identify and develop synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and inter\u00ad national) in his\/her area of responsibility; \n provide technical advice and support to regional and local DDR commissions and offices, as appropriate; \n be responsible for regular reporting on the situation pertaining to the armed forces and groups in his\/her area of responsibility and progress on the implementation of the DDR strategy. Prepare and contribute to the preparation of various reports and documents. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61464,14 +61464,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.4: DDR Field Officer (P4\u2013P3)", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "newParagraph": "organizational setting reporting relationship position located peace operation depending organizational structure mission location post incumbent may report directly chief ddr unit senior official charge ddr activity field location n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit ddr field officer responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn charge overall planning implementation ddr programme hisher regional area responsibility n act officer charge ddr staff member regional office including administration management fund allocated achieve ddr programme region n responsible day day coordination ddr operation mission component regional office un entity n identify develop synergy partnership actor national inter national hisher area responsibility n provide technical advice support regional local ddr commission office appropriate n responsible regular reporting situation pertaining armed force group hisher area responsibility progress implementation ddr strategy prepare contribute preparation various report document nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "SentID": 3414 }, { "ParagraphID": 1127, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61489,7 +61489,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1127, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61500,14 +61500,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.4: DDR Field Officer (P4\u2013P3)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support.", + "Sentence": "\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff provide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff provide guidance support", "SentID": 3416 }, { "ParagraphID": 1127, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61518,14 +61518,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.4: DDR Field Officer (P4\u2013P3)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness.", + "Sentence": "\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff provide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness", "SentID": 3417 }, { "ParagraphID": 1127, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61536,14 +61536,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.4: DDR Field Officer (P4\u2013P3)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives.", + "Sentence": "\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff provide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative", "SentID": 3418 }, { "ParagraphID": 1127, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61554,14 +61554,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.4: DDR Field Officer (P4\u2013P3)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs.", + "Sentence": "\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff provide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need", "SentID": 3419 }, { "ParagraphID": 1127, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61572,14 +61572,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.4: DDR Field Officer (P4\u2013P3)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials.", + "Sentence": "\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff provide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official", "SentID": 3420 }, { "ParagraphID": 1127, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61590,14 +61590,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.4: DDR Field Officer (P4\u2013P3)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Sentence": "\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff provide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "SentID": 3421 }, { "ParagraphID": 1128, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61615,7 +61615,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1128, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61633,7 +61633,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1128, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61644,14 +61644,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.4: DDR Field Officer (P4\u2013P3)", "Heading3": "Qualifications", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues.", + "Sentence": "\n Experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues.", "newParagraph": "education advanced university degree social science management economics business administration international development relevant field relevant combination academic qualification experience related area may accepted lieu advanced degree n experience minimum five year substantial experience working post conflict crisis economic recovery issue n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "ProcessedSent": "n experience minimum five year substantial experience working post conflict crisis economic recovery issue", "SentID": 3424 }, { "ParagraphID": 1128, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61662,7 +61662,7 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.4: DDR Field Officer (P4\u2013P3)", "Heading3": "Qualifications", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Sentence": "\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "newParagraph": "education advanced university degree social science management economics business administration international development relevant field relevant combination academic qualification experience related area may accepted lieu advanced degree n experience minimum five year substantial experience working post conflict crisis economic recovery issue n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "ProcessedSent": "n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "SentID": 3425 @@ -61687,7 +61687,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1130, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within the limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Regional DDR Officer, the DDR Field Officer (UNV) is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n assist the DDR Field Officer in the planning and implementation of one aspect of the DDR programme in his\/her regional area of responsibility; \\n be responsible for the day\u00adto\u00adday coordination of DDR operations with other mission components in the regional office and other UN entities on the specific area of respon\u00ad sibility; \\n identify and develop synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and inter\u00ad national) in his\/her area of responsibility; \\n provide technical advice and support to regional and local DDR commissions and offices, as appropriate; \\n be responsible for regular reporting on the situation pertaining to the armed forces and groups in his\/her area of responsibility and progress on the implementation of the DDR strategy. Prepare and contribute to the preparation of various reports and documents. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within the limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Regional DDR Officer, the DDR Field Officer (UNV) is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n assist the DDR Field Officer in the planning and implementation of one aspect of the DDR programme in his\/her regional area of responsibility; \n be responsible for the day\u00adto\u00adday coordination of DDR operations with other mission components in the regional office and other UN entities on the specific area of respon\u00ad sibility; \n identify and develop synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and inter\u00ad national) in his\/her area of responsibility; \n provide technical advice and support to regional and local DDR commissions and offices, as appropriate; \n be responsible for regular reporting on the situation pertaining to the armed forces and groups in his\/her area of responsibility and progress on the implementation of the DDR strategy. Prepare and contribute to the preparation of various reports and documents. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61705,7 +61705,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1130, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within the limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Regional DDR Officer, the DDR Field Officer (UNV) is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n assist the DDR Field Officer in the planning and implementation of one aspect of the DDR programme in his\/her regional area of responsibility; \\n be responsible for the day\u00adto\u00adday coordination of DDR operations with other mission components in the regional office and other UN entities on the specific area of respon\u00ad sibility; \\n identify and develop synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and inter\u00ad national) in his\/her area of responsibility; \\n provide technical advice and support to regional and local DDR commissions and offices, as appropriate; \\n be responsible for regular reporting on the situation pertaining to the armed forces and groups in his\/her area of responsibility and progress on the implementation of the DDR strategy. Prepare and contribute to the preparation of various reports and documents. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within the limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Regional DDR Officer, the DDR Field Officer (UNV) is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n assist the DDR Field Officer in the planning and implementation of one aspect of the DDR programme in his\/her regional area of responsibility; \n be responsible for the day\u00adto\u00adday coordination of DDR operations with other mission components in the regional office and other UN entities on the specific area of respon\u00ad sibility; \n identify and develop synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and inter\u00ad national) in his\/her area of responsibility; \n provide technical advice and support to regional and local DDR commissions and offices, as appropriate; \n be responsible for regular reporting on the situation pertaining to the armed forces and groups in his\/her area of responsibility and progress on the implementation of the DDR strategy. Prepare and contribute to the preparation of various reports and documents. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61723,7 +61723,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1130, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within the limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Regional DDR Officer, the DDR Field Officer (UNV) is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n assist the DDR Field Officer in the planning and implementation of one aspect of the DDR programme in his\/her regional area of responsibility; \\n be responsible for the day\u00adto\u00adday coordination of DDR operations with other mission components in the regional office and other UN entities on the specific area of respon\u00ad sibility; \\n identify and develop synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and inter\u00ad national) in his\/her area of responsibility; \\n provide technical advice and support to regional and local DDR commissions and offices, as appropriate; \\n be responsible for regular reporting on the situation pertaining to the armed forces and groups in his\/her area of responsibility and progress on the implementation of the DDR strategy. Prepare and contribute to the preparation of various reports and documents. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within the limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Regional DDR Officer, the DDR Field Officer (UNV) is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n assist the DDR Field Officer in the planning and implementation of one aspect of the DDR programme in his\/her regional area of responsibility; \n be responsible for the day\u00adto\u00adday coordination of DDR operations with other mission components in the regional office and other UN entities on the specific area of respon\u00ad sibility; \n identify and develop synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and inter\u00ad national) in his\/her area of responsibility; \n provide technical advice and support to regional and local DDR commissions and offices, as appropriate; \n be responsible for regular reporting on the situation pertaining to the armed forces and groups in his\/her area of responsibility and progress on the implementation of the DDR strategy. Prepare and contribute to the preparation of various reports and documents. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61734,14 +61734,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.5: DDR Field Officer (UNV)", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Accountabilities: Within the limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Regional DDR Officer, the DDR Field Officer (UNV) is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate.", + "Sentence": "\n Accountabilities: Within the limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Regional DDR Officer, the DDR Field Officer (UNV) is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate.", "newParagraph": "organizational setting reporting relationship position located peace operation depending organizational structure mission location post incumbent may report directly chief ddr unit senior official charge ddr activity field location n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision regional ddr officer ddr field officer unv responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn assist ddr field officer planning implementation one aspect ddr programme hisher regional area responsibility n responsible day day coordination ddr operation mission component regional office un entity specific area respon sibility n identify develop synergy partnership actor national inter national hisher area responsibility n provide technical advice support regional local ddr commission office appropriate n responsible regular reporting situation pertaining armed force group hisher area responsibility progress implementation ddr strategy prepare contribute preparation various report document nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision regional ddr officer ddr field officer unv responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate", "SentID": 3429 }, { "ParagraphID": 1130, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within the limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Regional DDR Officer, the DDR Field Officer (UNV) is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n assist the DDR Field Officer in the planning and implementation of one aspect of the DDR programme in his\/her regional area of responsibility; \\n be responsible for the day\u00adto\u00adday coordination of DDR operations with other mission components in the regional office and other UN entities on the specific area of respon\u00ad sibility; \\n identify and develop synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and inter\u00ad national) in his\/her area of responsibility; \\n provide technical advice and support to regional and local DDR commissions and offices, as appropriate; \\n be responsible for regular reporting on the situation pertaining to the armed forces and groups in his\/her area of responsibility and progress on the implementation of the DDR strategy. Prepare and contribute to the preparation of various reports and documents. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within the limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Regional DDR Officer, the DDR Field Officer (UNV) is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n assist the DDR Field Officer in the planning and implementation of one aspect of the DDR programme in his\/her regional area of responsibility; \n be responsible for the day\u00adto\u00adday coordination of DDR operations with other mission components in the regional office and other UN entities on the specific area of respon\u00ad sibility; \n identify and develop synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and inter\u00ad national) in his\/her area of responsibility; \n provide technical advice and support to regional and local DDR commissions and offices, as appropriate; \n be responsible for regular reporting on the situation pertaining to the armed forces and groups in his\/her area of responsibility and progress on the implementation of the DDR strategy. Prepare and contribute to the preparation of various reports and documents. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61759,7 +61759,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1130, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within the limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Regional DDR Officer, the DDR Field Officer (UNV) is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n assist the DDR Field Officer in the planning and implementation of one aspect of the DDR programme in his\/her regional area of responsibility; \\n be responsible for the day\u00adto\u00adday coordination of DDR operations with other mission components in the regional office and other UN entities on the specific area of respon\u00ad sibility; \\n identify and develop synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and inter\u00ad national) in his\/her area of responsibility; \\n provide technical advice and support to regional and local DDR commissions and offices, as appropriate; \\n be responsible for regular reporting on the situation pertaining to the armed forces and groups in his\/her area of responsibility and progress on the implementation of the DDR strategy. Prepare and contribute to the preparation of various reports and documents. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within the limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Regional DDR Officer, the DDR Field Officer (UNV) is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n assist the DDR Field Officer in the planning and implementation of one aspect of the DDR programme in his\/her regional area of responsibility; \n be responsible for the day\u00adto\u00adday coordination of DDR operations with other mission components in the regional office and other UN entities on the specific area of respon\u00ad sibility; \n identify and develop synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and inter\u00ad national) in his\/her area of responsibility; \n provide technical advice and support to regional and local DDR commissions and offices, as appropriate; \n be responsible for regular reporting on the situation pertaining to the armed forces and groups in his\/her area of responsibility and progress on the implementation of the DDR strategy. Prepare and contribute to the preparation of various reports and documents. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61770,14 +61770,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.5: DDR Field Officer (UNV)", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n assist the DDR Field Officer in the planning and implementation of one aspect of the DDR programme in his\/her regional area of responsibility; \\n be responsible for the day\u00adto\u00adday coordination of DDR operations with other mission components in the regional office and other UN entities on the specific area of respon\u00ad sibility; \\n identify and develop synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and inter\u00ad national) in his\/her area of responsibility; \\n provide technical advice and support to regional and local DDR commissions and offices, as appropriate; \\n be responsible for regular reporting on the situation pertaining to the armed forces and groups in his\/her area of responsibility and progress on the implementation of the DDR strategy.", + "Sentence": "\n\n assist the DDR Field Officer in the planning and implementation of one aspect of the DDR programme in his\/her regional area of responsibility; \n be responsible for the day\u00adto\u00adday coordination of DDR operations with other mission components in the regional office and other UN entities on the specific area of respon\u00ad sibility; \n identify and develop synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and inter\u00ad national) in his\/her area of responsibility; \n provide technical advice and support to regional and local DDR commissions and offices, as appropriate; \n be responsible for regular reporting on the situation pertaining to the armed forces and groups in his\/her area of responsibility and progress on the implementation of the DDR strategy.", "newParagraph": "organizational setting reporting relationship position located peace operation depending organizational structure mission location post incumbent may report directly chief ddr unit senior official charge ddr activity field location n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision regional ddr officer ddr field officer unv responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn assist ddr field officer planning implementation one aspect ddr programme hisher regional area responsibility n responsible day day coordination ddr operation mission component regional office un entity specific area respon sibility n identify develop synergy partnership actor national inter national hisher area responsibility n provide technical advice support regional local ddr commission office appropriate n responsible regular reporting situation pertaining armed force group hisher area responsibility progress implementation ddr strategy prepare contribute preparation various report document nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "nn assist ddr field officer planning implementation one aspect ddr programme hisher regional area responsibility n responsible day day coordination ddr operation mission component regional office un entity specific area respon sibility n identify develop synergy partnership actor national inter national hisher area responsibility n provide technical advice support regional local ddr commission office appropriate n responsible regular reporting situation pertaining armed force group hisher area responsibility progress implementation ddr strategy", "SentID": 3431 }, { "ParagraphID": 1130, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within the limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Regional DDR Officer, the DDR Field Officer (UNV) is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n assist the DDR Field Officer in the planning and implementation of one aspect of the DDR programme in his\/her regional area of responsibility; \\n be responsible for the day\u00adto\u00adday coordination of DDR operations with other mission components in the regional office and other UN entities on the specific area of respon\u00ad sibility; \\n identify and develop synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and inter\u00ad national) in his\/her area of responsibility; \\n provide technical advice and support to regional and local DDR commissions and offices, as appropriate; \\n be responsible for regular reporting on the situation pertaining to the armed forces and groups in his\/her area of responsibility and progress on the implementation of the DDR strategy. Prepare and contribute to the preparation of various reports and documents. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within the limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Regional DDR Officer, the DDR Field Officer (UNV) is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n assist the DDR Field Officer in the planning and implementation of one aspect of the DDR programme in his\/her regional area of responsibility; \n be responsible for the day\u00adto\u00adday coordination of DDR operations with other mission components in the regional office and other UN entities on the specific area of respon\u00ad sibility; \n identify and develop synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and inter\u00ad national) in his\/her area of responsibility; \n provide technical advice and support to regional and local DDR commissions and offices, as appropriate; \n be responsible for regular reporting on the situation pertaining to the armed forces and groups in his\/her area of responsibility and progress on the implementation of the DDR strategy. Prepare and contribute to the preparation of various reports and documents. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61795,7 +61795,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1130, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within the limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Regional DDR Officer, the DDR Field Officer (UNV) is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n assist the DDR Field Officer in the planning and implementation of one aspect of the DDR programme in his\/her regional area of responsibility; \\n be responsible for the day\u00adto\u00adday coordination of DDR operations with other mission components in the regional office and other UN entities on the specific area of respon\u00ad sibility; \\n identify and develop synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and inter\u00ad national) in his\/her area of responsibility; \\n provide technical advice and support to regional and local DDR commissions and offices, as appropriate; \\n be responsible for regular reporting on the situation pertaining to the armed forces and groups in his\/her area of responsibility and progress on the implementation of the DDR strategy. Prepare and contribute to the preparation of various reports and documents. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within the limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Regional DDR Officer, the DDR Field Officer (UNV) is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n assist the DDR Field Officer in the planning and implementation of one aspect of the DDR programme in his\/her regional area of responsibility; \n be responsible for the day\u00adto\u00adday coordination of DDR operations with other mission components in the regional office and other UN entities on the specific area of respon\u00ad sibility; \n identify and develop synergies and partnerships with other actors (national and inter\u00ad national) in his\/her area of responsibility; \n provide technical advice and support to regional and local DDR commissions and offices, as appropriate; \n be responsible for regular reporting on the situation pertaining to the armed forces and groups in his\/her area of responsibility and progress on the implementation of the DDR strategy. Prepare and contribute to the preparation of various reports and documents. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61806,14 +61806,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.5: DDR Field Officer (UNV)", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "newParagraph": "organizational setting reporting relationship position located peace operation depending organizational structure mission location post incumbent may report directly chief ddr unit senior official charge ddr activity field location n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision regional ddr officer ddr field officer unv responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn assist ddr field officer planning implementation one aspect ddr programme hisher regional area responsibility n responsible day day coordination ddr operation mission component regional office un entity specific area respon sibility n identify develop synergy partnership actor national inter national hisher area responsibility n provide technical advice support regional local ddr commission office appropriate n responsible regular reporting situation pertaining armed force group hisher area responsibility progress implementation ddr strategy prepare contribute preparation various report document nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "SentID": 3433 }, { "ParagraphID": 1131, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61831,7 +61831,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1131, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61842,14 +61842,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.5: DDR Field Officer (UNV)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness.", + "Sentence": "\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness", "SentID": 3435 }, { "ParagraphID": 1131, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61860,14 +61860,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.5: DDR Field Officer (UNV)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives.", + "Sentence": "\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative", "SentID": 3436 }, { "ParagraphID": 1131, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61878,14 +61878,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.5: DDR Field Officer (UNV)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs.", + "Sentence": "\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need", "SentID": 3437 }, { "ParagraphID": 1131, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61896,14 +61896,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.5: DDR Field Officer (UNV)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials.", + "Sentence": "\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official", "SentID": 3438 }, { "ParagraphID": 1131, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61914,14 +61914,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.5: DDR Field Officer (UNV)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Sentence": "\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "SentID": 3439 }, { "ParagraphID": 1132, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of three years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of three years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61939,7 +61939,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1132, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of three years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of three years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61957,7 +61957,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1132, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of three years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of three years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61968,14 +61968,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.5: DDR Field Officer (UNV)", "Heading3": "Qualifications", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Work experience: Minimum of three years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues.", + "Sentence": "\n Work experience: Minimum of three years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues.", "newParagraph": "education advanced university degree social science management economics business administration international development relevant field relevant combination academic qualification experience related area may accepted lieu advanced degree n work experience minimum three year substantial experience working post conflict crisis economic recovery issue n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "ProcessedSent": "n work experience minimum three year substantial experience working post conflict crisis economic recovery issue", "SentID": 3442 }, { "ParagraphID": 1132, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of three years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of three years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -61986,7 +61986,7 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.5: DDR Field Officer (UNV)", "Heading3": "Qualifications", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Sentence": "\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "newParagraph": "education advanced university degree social science management economics business administration international development relevant field relevant combination academic qualification experience related area may accepted lieu advanced degree n work experience minimum three year substantial experience working post conflict crisis economic recovery issue n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "ProcessedSent": "n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "SentID": 3443 @@ -62011,7 +62011,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1134, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit and DDR Field Coordinator, the DDR Programme Officer is respon\u00ad sible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n work with local authorities and civil society organizations to facilitate and implement all aspects of the DDR programme \\n represent the DDR Unit in mission internal regional meetings; \\n work closely with DDR partners at the regional level to facilitate collection, safe storage and accountable collection of small arms and light weapons. Ensure efficient, account\u00ad able and transparent management of all field facilities pertaining to community\u00adspecific DDR projects; \\n plan and support activities at the regional level pertaining to the community arms col\u00ad lection and development including: (1) capacity\u00adbuilding; (2) sensitization and public awareness\u00adraising on the dangers of illicit weapons circulating in the community; (3) implementation of community project; \\n monitor, evaluate and report on all field project activities; monitor and guide field staff working in the project, including the coordination of sensitization and arms col\u00ad lection activities undertaken by Field Assistants at regional level; \\n ensure proper handling of project equipment and accountability of all project resources. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit and DDR Field Coordinator, the DDR Programme Officer is respon\u00ad sible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n work with local authorities and civil society organizations to facilitate and implement all aspects of the DDR programme \n represent the DDR Unit in mission internal regional meetings; \n work closely with DDR partners at the regional level to facilitate collection, safe storage and accountable collection of small arms and light weapons. Ensure efficient, account\u00ad able and transparent management of all field facilities pertaining to community\u00adspecific DDR projects; \n plan and support activities at the regional level pertaining to the community arms col\u00ad lection and development including: (1) capacity\u00adbuilding; (2) sensitization and public awareness\u00adraising on the dangers of illicit weapons circulating in the community; (3) implementation of community project; \n monitor, evaluate and report on all field project activities; monitor and guide field staff working in the project, including the coordination of sensitization and arms col\u00ad lection activities undertaken by Field Assistants at regional level; \n ensure proper handling of project equipment and accountability of all project resources. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62029,7 +62029,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1134, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit and DDR Field Coordinator, the DDR Programme Officer is respon\u00ad sible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n work with local authorities and civil society organizations to facilitate and implement all aspects of the DDR programme \\n represent the DDR Unit in mission internal regional meetings; \\n work closely with DDR partners at the regional level to facilitate collection, safe storage and accountable collection of small arms and light weapons. Ensure efficient, account\u00ad able and transparent management of all field facilities pertaining to community\u00adspecific DDR projects; \\n plan and support activities at the regional level pertaining to the community arms col\u00ad lection and development including: (1) capacity\u00adbuilding; (2) sensitization and public awareness\u00adraising on the dangers of illicit weapons circulating in the community; (3) implementation of community project; \\n monitor, evaluate and report on all field project activities; monitor and guide field staff working in the project, including the coordination of sensitization and arms col\u00ad lection activities undertaken by Field Assistants at regional level; \\n ensure proper handling of project equipment and accountability of all project resources. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit and DDR Field Coordinator, the DDR Programme Officer is respon\u00ad sible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n work with local authorities and civil society organizations to facilitate and implement all aspects of the DDR programme \n represent the DDR Unit in mission internal regional meetings; \n work closely with DDR partners at the regional level to facilitate collection, safe storage and accountable collection of small arms and light weapons. Ensure efficient, account\u00ad able and transparent management of all field facilities pertaining to community\u00adspecific DDR projects; \n plan and support activities at the regional level pertaining to the community arms col\u00ad lection and development including: (1) capacity\u00adbuilding; (2) sensitization and public awareness\u00adraising on the dangers of illicit weapons circulating in the community; (3) implementation of community project; \n monitor, evaluate and report on all field project activities; monitor and guide field staff working in the project, including the coordination of sensitization and arms col\u00ad lection activities undertaken by Field Assistants at regional level; \n ensure proper handling of project equipment and accountability of all project resources. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62047,7 +62047,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1134, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit and DDR Field Coordinator, the DDR Programme Officer is respon\u00ad sible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n work with local authorities and civil society organizations to facilitate and implement all aspects of the DDR programme \\n represent the DDR Unit in mission internal regional meetings; \\n work closely with DDR partners at the regional level to facilitate collection, safe storage and accountable collection of small arms and light weapons. Ensure efficient, account\u00ad able and transparent management of all field facilities pertaining to community\u00adspecific DDR projects; \\n plan and support activities at the regional level pertaining to the community arms col\u00ad lection and development including: (1) capacity\u00adbuilding; (2) sensitization and public awareness\u00adraising on the dangers of illicit weapons circulating in the community; (3) implementation of community project; \\n monitor, evaluate and report on all field project activities; monitor and guide field staff working in the project, including the coordination of sensitization and arms col\u00ad lection activities undertaken by Field Assistants at regional level; \\n ensure proper handling of project equipment and accountability of all project resources. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit and DDR Field Coordinator, the DDR Programme Officer is respon\u00ad sible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n work with local authorities and civil society organizations to facilitate and implement all aspects of the DDR programme \n represent the DDR Unit in mission internal regional meetings; \n work closely with DDR partners at the regional level to facilitate collection, safe storage and accountable collection of small arms and light weapons. Ensure efficient, account\u00ad able and transparent management of all field facilities pertaining to community\u00adspecific DDR projects; \n plan and support activities at the regional level pertaining to the community arms col\u00ad lection and development including: (1) capacity\u00adbuilding; (2) sensitization and public awareness\u00adraising on the dangers of illicit weapons circulating in the community; (3) implementation of community project; \n monitor, evaluate and report on all field project activities; monitor and guide field staff working in the project, including the coordination of sensitization and arms col\u00ad lection activities undertaken by Field Assistants at regional level; \n ensure proper handling of project equipment and accountability of all project resources. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62058,14 +62058,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.6: DDR Programme Officer (UNV)", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit and DDR Field Coordinator, the DDR Programme Officer is respon\u00ad sible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate.", + "Sentence": "\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit and DDR Field Coordinator, the DDR Programme Officer is respon\u00ad sible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate.", "newParagraph": "organizational setting reporting relationship position located peace operation depending organizational structure mission location post incumbent may report directly chief ddr unit senior official charge ddr activity field location n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit ddr field coordinator ddr programme officer respon sible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn work local authority civil society organization facilitate implement aspect ddr programme n represent ddr unit mission internal regional meeting n work closely ddr partner regional level facilitate collection safe storage accountable collection small arm light weapon ensure efficient account able transparent management field facility pertaining community specific ddr project n plan support activity regional level pertaining community arm col lection development including 1 capacity building 2 sensitization public awareness raising danger illicit weapon circulating community 3 implementation community project n monitor evaluate report field project activity monitor guide field staff working project including coordination sensitization arm col lection activity undertaken field assistant regional level n ensure proper handling project equipment accountability project resource nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit ddr field coordinator ddr programme officer respon sible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate", "SentID": 3447 }, { "ParagraphID": 1134, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit and DDR Field Coordinator, the DDR Programme Officer is respon\u00ad sible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n work with local authorities and civil society organizations to facilitate and implement all aspects of the DDR programme \\n represent the DDR Unit in mission internal regional meetings; \\n work closely with DDR partners at the regional level to facilitate collection, safe storage and accountable collection of small arms and light weapons. Ensure efficient, account\u00ad able and transparent management of all field facilities pertaining to community\u00adspecific DDR projects; \\n plan and support activities at the regional level pertaining to the community arms col\u00ad lection and development including: (1) capacity\u00adbuilding; (2) sensitization and public awareness\u00adraising on the dangers of illicit weapons circulating in the community; (3) implementation of community project; \\n monitor, evaluate and report on all field project activities; monitor and guide field staff working in the project, including the coordination of sensitization and arms col\u00ad lection activities undertaken by Field Assistants at regional level; \\n ensure proper handling of project equipment and accountability of all project resources. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit and DDR Field Coordinator, the DDR Programme Officer is respon\u00ad sible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n work with local authorities and civil society organizations to facilitate and implement all aspects of the DDR programme \n represent the DDR Unit in mission internal regional meetings; \n work closely with DDR partners at the regional level to facilitate collection, safe storage and accountable collection of small arms and light weapons. Ensure efficient, account\u00ad able and transparent management of all field facilities pertaining to community\u00adspecific DDR projects; \n plan and support activities at the regional level pertaining to the community arms col\u00ad lection and development including: (1) capacity\u00adbuilding; (2) sensitization and public awareness\u00adraising on the dangers of illicit weapons circulating in the community; (3) implementation of community project; \n monitor, evaluate and report on all field project activities; monitor and guide field staff working in the project, including the coordination of sensitization and arms col\u00ad lection activities undertaken by Field Assistants at regional level; \n ensure proper handling of project equipment and accountability of all project resources. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62083,7 +62083,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1134, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit and DDR Field Coordinator, the DDR Programme Officer is respon\u00ad sible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n work with local authorities and civil society organizations to facilitate and implement all aspects of the DDR programme \\n represent the DDR Unit in mission internal regional meetings; \\n work closely with DDR partners at the regional level to facilitate collection, safe storage and accountable collection of small arms and light weapons. Ensure efficient, account\u00ad able and transparent management of all field facilities pertaining to community\u00adspecific DDR projects; \\n plan and support activities at the regional level pertaining to the community arms col\u00ad lection and development including: (1) capacity\u00adbuilding; (2) sensitization and public awareness\u00adraising on the dangers of illicit weapons circulating in the community; (3) implementation of community project; \\n monitor, evaluate and report on all field project activities; monitor and guide field staff working in the project, including the coordination of sensitization and arms col\u00ad lection activities undertaken by Field Assistants at regional level; \\n ensure proper handling of project equipment and accountability of all project resources. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit and DDR Field Coordinator, the DDR Programme Officer is respon\u00ad sible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n work with local authorities and civil society organizations to facilitate and implement all aspects of the DDR programme \n represent the DDR Unit in mission internal regional meetings; \n work closely with DDR partners at the regional level to facilitate collection, safe storage and accountable collection of small arms and light weapons. Ensure efficient, account\u00ad able and transparent management of all field facilities pertaining to community\u00adspecific DDR projects; \n plan and support activities at the regional level pertaining to the community arms col\u00ad lection and development including: (1) capacity\u00adbuilding; (2) sensitization and public awareness\u00adraising on the dangers of illicit weapons circulating in the community; (3) implementation of community project; \n monitor, evaluate and report on all field project activities; monitor and guide field staff working in the project, including the coordination of sensitization and arms col\u00ad lection activities undertaken by Field Assistants at regional level; \n ensure proper handling of project equipment and accountability of all project resources. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62094,14 +62094,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.6: DDR Programme Officer (UNV)", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n work with local authorities and civil society organizations to facilitate and implement all aspects of the DDR programme \\n represent the DDR Unit in mission internal regional meetings; \\n work closely with DDR partners at the regional level to facilitate collection, safe storage and accountable collection of small arms and light weapons.", + "Sentence": "\n\n work with local authorities and civil society organizations to facilitate and implement all aspects of the DDR programme \n represent the DDR Unit in mission internal regional meetings; \n work closely with DDR partners at the regional level to facilitate collection, safe storage and accountable collection of small arms and light weapons.", "newParagraph": "organizational setting reporting relationship position located peace operation depending organizational structure mission location post incumbent may report directly chief ddr unit senior official charge ddr activity field location n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit ddr field coordinator ddr programme officer respon sible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn work local authority civil society organization facilitate implement aspect ddr programme n represent ddr unit mission internal regional meeting n work closely ddr partner regional level facilitate collection safe storage accountable collection small arm light weapon ensure efficient account able transparent management field facility pertaining community specific ddr project n plan support activity regional level pertaining community arm col lection development including 1 capacity building 2 sensitization public awareness raising danger illicit weapon circulating community 3 implementation community project n monitor evaluate report field project activity monitor guide field staff working project including coordination sensitization arm col lection activity undertaken field assistant regional level n ensure proper handling project equipment accountability project resource nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "nn work local authority civil society organization facilitate implement aspect ddr programme n represent ddr unit mission internal regional meeting n work closely ddr partner regional level facilitate collection safe storage accountable collection small arm light weapon", "SentID": 3449 }, { "ParagraphID": 1134, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit and DDR Field Coordinator, the DDR Programme Officer is respon\u00ad sible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n work with local authorities and civil society organizations to facilitate and implement all aspects of the DDR programme \\n represent the DDR Unit in mission internal regional meetings; \\n work closely with DDR partners at the regional level to facilitate collection, safe storage and accountable collection of small arms and light weapons. Ensure efficient, account\u00ad able and transparent management of all field facilities pertaining to community\u00adspecific DDR projects; \\n plan and support activities at the regional level pertaining to the community arms col\u00ad lection and development including: (1) capacity\u00adbuilding; (2) sensitization and public awareness\u00adraising on the dangers of illicit weapons circulating in the community; (3) implementation of community project; \\n monitor, evaluate and report on all field project activities; monitor and guide field staff working in the project, including the coordination of sensitization and arms col\u00ad lection activities undertaken by Field Assistants at regional level; \\n ensure proper handling of project equipment and accountability of all project resources. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit and DDR Field Coordinator, the DDR Programme Officer is respon\u00ad sible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n work with local authorities and civil society organizations to facilitate and implement all aspects of the DDR programme \n represent the DDR Unit in mission internal regional meetings; \n work closely with DDR partners at the regional level to facilitate collection, safe storage and accountable collection of small arms and light weapons. Ensure efficient, account\u00ad able and transparent management of all field facilities pertaining to community\u00adspecific DDR projects; \n plan and support activities at the regional level pertaining to the community arms col\u00ad lection and development including: (1) capacity\u00adbuilding; (2) sensitization and public awareness\u00adraising on the dangers of illicit weapons circulating in the community; (3) implementation of community project; \n monitor, evaluate and report on all field project activities; monitor and guide field staff working in the project, including the coordination of sensitization and arms col\u00ad lection activities undertaken by Field Assistants at regional level; \n ensure proper handling of project equipment and accountability of all project resources. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62112,14 +62112,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.6: DDR Programme Officer (UNV)", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Ensure efficient, account\u00ad able and transparent management of all field facilities pertaining to community\u00adspecific DDR projects; \\n plan and support activities at the regional level pertaining to the community arms col\u00ad lection and development including: (1) capacity\u00adbuilding; (2) sensitization and public awareness\u00adraising on the dangers of illicit weapons circulating in the community; (3) implementation of community project; \\n monitor, evaluate and report on all field project activities; monitor and guide field staff working in the project, including the coordination of sensitization and arms col\u00ad lection activities undertaken by Field Assistants at regional level; \\n ensure proper handling of project equipment and accountability of all project resources.", + "Sentence": "Ensure efficient, account\u00ad able and transparent management of all field facilities pertaining to community\u00adspecific DDR projects; \n plan and support activities at the regional level pertaining to the community arms col\u00ad lection and development including: (1) capacity\u00adbuilding; (2) sensitization and public awareness\u00adraising on the dangers of illicit weapons circulating in the community; (3) implementation of community project; \n monitor, evaluate and report on all field project activities; monitor and guide field staff working in the project, including the coordination of sensitization and arms col\u00ad lection activities undertaken by Field Assistants at regional level; \n ensure proper handling of project equipment and accountability of all project resources.", "newParagraph": "organizational setting reporting relationship position located peace operation depending organizational structure mission location post incumbent may report directly chief ddr unit senior official charge ddr activity field location n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit ddr field coordinator ddr programme officer respon sible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn work local authority civil society organization facilitate implement aspect ddr programme n represent ddr unit mission internal regional meeting n work closely ddr partner regional level facilitate collection safe storage accountable collection small arm light weapon ensure efficient account able transparent management field facility pertaining community specific ddr project n plan support activity regional level pertaining community arm col lection development including 1 capacity building 2 sensitization public awareness raising danger illicit weapon circulating community 3 implementation community project n monitor evaluate report field project activity monitor guide field staff working project including coordination sensitization arm col lection activity undertaken field assistant regional level n ensure proper handling project equipment accountability project resource nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "ensure efficient account able transparent management field facility pertaining community specific ddr project n plan support activity regional level pertaining community arm col lection development including 1 capacity building 2 sensitization public awareness raising danger illicit weapon circulating community 3 implementation community project n monitor evaluate report field project activity monitor guide field staff working project including coordination sensitization arm col lection activity undertaken field assistant regional level n ensure proper handling project equipment accountability project resource", "SentID": 3450 }, { "ParagraphID": 1134, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit and DDR Field Coordinator, the DDR Programme Officer is respon\u00ad sible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n work with local authorities and civil society organizations to facilitate and implement all aspects of the DDR programme \\n represent the DDR Unit in mission internal regional meetings; \\n work closely with DDR partners at the regional level to facilitate collection, safe storage and accountable collection of small arms and light weapons. Ensure efficient, account\u00ad able and transparent management of all field facilities pertaining to community\u00adspecific DDR projects; \\n plan and support activities at the regional level pertaining to the community arms col\u00ad lection and development including: (1) capacity\u00adbuilding; (2) sensitization and public awareness\u00adraising on the dangers of illicit weapons circulating in the community; (3) implementation of community project; \\n monitor, evaluate and report on all field project activities; monitor and guide field staff working in the project, including the coordination of sensitization and arms col\u00ad lection activities undertaken by Field Assistants at regional level; \\n ensure proper handling of project equipment and accountability of all project resources. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit and DDR Field Coordinator, the DDR Programme Officer is respon\u00ad sible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n work with local authorities and civil society organizations to facilitate and implement all aspects of the DDR programme \n represent the DDR Unit in mission internal regional meetings; \n work closely with DDR partners at the regional level to facilitate collection, safe storage and accountable collection of small arms and light weapons. Ensure efficient, account\u00ad able and transparent management of all field facilities pertaining to community\u00adspecific DDR projects; \n plan and support activities at the regional level pertaining to the community arms col\u00ad lection and development including: (1) capacity\u00adbuilding; (2) sensitization and public awareness\u00adraising on the dangers of illicit weapons circulating in the community; (3) implementation of community project; \n monitor, evaluate and report on all field project activities; monitor and guide field staff working in the project, including the coordination of sensitization and arms col\u00ad lection activities undertaken by Field Assistants at regional level; \n ensure proper handling of project equipment and accountability of all project resources. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62130,14 +62130,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.6: DDR Programme Officer (UNV)", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity", + "Sentence": "\n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity", "newParagraph": "organizational setting reporting relationship position located peace operation depending organizational structure mission location post incumbent may report directly chief ddr unit senior official charge ddr activity field location n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit ddr field coordinator ddr programme officer respon sible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn work local authority civil society organization facilitate implement aspect ddr programme n represent ddr unit mission internal regional meeting n work closely ddr partner regional level facilitate collection safe storage accountable collection small arm light weapon ensure efficient account able transparent management field facility pertaining community specific ddr project n plan support activity regional level pertaining community arm col lection development including 1 capacity building 2 sensitization public awareness raising danger illicit weapon circulating community 3 implementation community project n monitor evaluate report field project activity monitor guide field staff working project including coordination sensitization arm col lection activity undertaken field assistant regional level n ensure proper handling project equipment accountability project resource nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "SentID": 3451 }, { "ParagraphID": 1135, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62155,7 +62155,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1135, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62166,14 +62166,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.6: DDR Programme Officer (UNV)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support.", + "Sentence": "\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support", "SentID": 3453 }, { "ParagraphID": 1135, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62184,14 +62184,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.6: DDR Programme Officer (UNV)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness.", + "Sentence": "\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness", "SentID": 3454 }, { "ParagraphID": 1135, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62202,14 +62202,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.6: DDR Programme Officer (UNV)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives.", + "Sentence": "\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative", "SentID": 3455 }, { "ParagraphID": 1135, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62220,14 +62220,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.6: DDR Programme Officer (UNV)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs.", + "Sentence": "\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need", "SentID": 3456 }, { "ParagraphID": 1135, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62238,14 +62238,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.6: DDR Programme Officer (UNV)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials.", + "Sentence": "\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official", "SentID": 3457 }, { "ParagraphID": 1135, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62256,14 +62256,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.6: DDR Programme Officer (UNV)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Sentence": "\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "SentID": 3458 }, { "ParagraphID": 1136, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience with local development, microcredit and participatory approaches essential. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience with local development, microcredit and participatory approaches essential. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62281,7 +62281,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1136, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience with local development, microcredit and participatory approaches essential. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience with local development, microcredit and participatory approaches essential. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62299,7 +62299,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1136, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience with local development, microcredit and participatory approaches essential. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience with local development, microcredit and participatory approaches essential. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62310,14 +62310,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.6: DDR Programme Officer (UNV)", "Heading3": "Qualifications", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues.", + "Sentence": "\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues.", "newParagraph": "education advanced university degree social science management economics business administration international development relevant field relevant combination academic qualification experience related area may accepted lieu advanced degree n work experience minimum five year substantial experience working post conflict crisis economic recovery issue experience local development microcredit participatory approach essential n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "ProcessedSent": "n work experience minimum five year substantial experience working post conflict crisis economic recovery issue", "SentID": 3461 }, { "ParagraphID": 1136, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience with local development, microcredit and participatory approaches essential. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience with local development, microcredit and participatory approaches essential. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62335,7 +62335,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1136, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience with local development, microcredit and participatory approaches essential. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience with local development, microcredit and participatory approaches essential. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62346,7 +62346,7 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.6: DDR Programme Officer (UNV)", "Heading3": "Qualifications", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Sentence": "\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "newParagraph": "education advanced university degree social science management economics business administration international development relevant field relevant combination academic qualification experience related area may accepted lieu advanced degree n work experience minimum five year substantial experience working post conflict crisis economic recovery issue experience local development microcredit participatory approach essential n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "ProcessedSent": "n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "SentID": 3463 @@ -62371,7 +62371,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1138, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\nAccountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Monitoring and Evaluation Officer is responsible for the follow\u00ad ing duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n develop monitoring and evaluation criteria for all aspects of disarmament and reinte\u00ad gration activities, as well as an overall strategy and monitoring calendar; \\n establish baselines for monitoring and evaluation purposes in the areas related to disarmament and reintegration, working in close collaboration with the disarmament and reintegration officers, to allow for effective evaluations of programme impact; \\n undertake periodic reviews of disarmament and reintegration activities to assess effec\u00ad tiveness, efficiency, achievement of results and compliance with procedures; \\n develop a field manual on standards and procedures for use by local partners and executing agencies, and organize training; \\n undertake periodic field visits to inspect the provision of reinsertion benefits and the implementation of reintegration projects, and reporting; \\n develop recommendations on ongoing and future activities, lessons learned, modifica\u00ad tions to implementation strategies and arrangements with partners. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \nAccountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Monitoring and Evaluation Officer is responsible for the follow\u00ad ing duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n develop monitoring and evaluation criteria for all aspects of disarmament and reinte\u00ad gration activities, as well as an overall strategy and monitoring calendar; \n establish baselines for monitoring and evaluation purposes in the areas related to disarmament and reintegration, working in close collaboration with the disarmament and reintegration officers, to allow for effective evaluations of programme impact; \n undertake periodic reviews of disarmament and reintegration activities to assess effec\u00ad tiveness, efficiency, achievement of results and compliance with procedures; \n develop a field manual on standards and procedures for use by local partners and executing agencies, and organize training; \n undertake periodic field visits to inspect the provision of reinsertion benefits and the implementation of reintegration projects, and reporting; \n develop recommendations on ongoing and future activities, lessons learned, modifica\u00ad tions to implementation strategies and arrangements with partners. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62389,7 +62389,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1138, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\nAccountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Monitoring and Evaluation Officer is responsible for the follow\u00ad ing duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n develop monitoring and evaluation criteria for all aspects of disarmament and reinte\u00ad gration activities, as well as an overall strategy and monitoring calendar; \\n establish baselines for monitoring and evaluation purposes in the areas related to disarmament and reintegration, working in close collaboration with the disarmament and reintegration officers, to allow for effective evaluations of programme impact; \\n undertake periodic reviews of disarmament and reintegration activities to assess effec\u00ad tiveness, efficiency, achievement of results and compliance with procedures; \\n develop a field manual on standards and procedures for use by local partners and executing agencies, and organize training; \\n undertake periodic field visits to inspect the provision of reinsertion benefits and the implementation of reintegration projects, and reporting; \\n develop recommendations on ongoing and future activities, lessons learned, modifica\u00ad tions to implementation strategies and arrangements with partners. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \nAccountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Monitoring and Evaluation Officer is responsible for the follow\u00ad ing duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n develop monitoring and evaluation criteria for all aspects of disarmament and reinte\u00ad gration activities, as well as an overall strategy and monitoring calendar; \n establish baselines for monitoring and evaluation purposes in the areas related to disarmament and reintegration, working in close collaboration with the disarmament and reintegration officers, to allow for effective evaluations of programme impact; \n undertake periodic reviews of disarmament and reintegration activities to assess effec\u00ad tiveness, efficiency, achievement of results and compliance with procedures; \n develop a field manual on standards and procedures for use by local partners and executing agencies, and organize training; \n undertake periodic field visits to inspect the provision of reinsertion benefits and the implementation of reintegration projects, and reporting; \n develop recommendations on ongoing and future activities, lessons learned, modifica\u00ad tions to implementation strategies and arrangements with partners. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62407,7 +62407,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1138, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\nAccountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Monitoring and Evaluation Officer is responsible for the follow\u00ad ing duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n develop monitoring and evaluation criteria for all aspects of disarmament and reinte\u00ad gration activities, as well as an overall strategy and monitoring calendar; \\n establish baselines for monitoring and evaluation purposes in the areas related to disarmament and reintegration, working in close collaboration with the disarmament and reintegration officers, to allow for effective evaluations of programme impact; \\n undertake periodic reviews of disarmament and reintegration activities to assess effec\u00ad tiveness, efficiency, achievement of results and compliance with procedures; \\n develop a field manual on standards and procedures for use by local partners and executing agencies, and organize training; \\n undertake periodic field visits to inspect the provision of reinsertion benefits and the implementation of reintegration projects, and reporting; \\n develop recommendations on ongoing and future activities, lessons learned, modifica\u00ad tions to implementation strategies and arrangements with partners. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \nAccountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Monitoring and Evaluation Officer is responsible for the follow\u00ad ing duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n develop monitoring and evaluation criteria for all aspects of disarmament and reinte\u00ad gration activities, as well as an overall strategy and monitoring calendar; \n establish baselines for monitoring and evaluation purposes in the areas related to disarmament and reintegration, working in close collaboration with the disarmament and reintegration officers, to allow for effective evaluations of programme impact; \n undertake periodic reviews of disarmament and reintegration activities to assess effec\u00ad tiveness, efficiency, achievement of results and compliance with procedures; \n develop a field manual on standards and procedures for use by local partners and executing agencies, and organize training; \n undertake periodic field visits to inspect the provision of reinsertion benefits and the implementation of reintegration projects, and reporting; \n develop recommendations on ongoing and future activities, lessons learned, modifica\u00ad tions to implementation strategies and arrangements with partners. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62418,14 +62418,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.7: DDR Monitoring and Evaluation Officer (P2\u2013UNV) Draft generic job profile", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nAccountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Monitoring and Evaluation Officer is responsible for the follow\u00ad ing duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate.", + "Sentence": "\nAccountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Monitoring and Evaluation Officer is responsible for the follow\u00ad ing duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate.", "newParagraph": "organizational setting reporting relationship position located peace operation depending organizational structure mission location post incumbent may report directly chief ddr unit senior official charge ddr activity field location naccountabilities within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit monitoring evaluation officer responsible follow ing duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn develop monitoring evaluation criterion aspect disarmament reinte gration activity well overall strategy monitoring calendar n establish baseline monitoring evaluation purpose area related disarmament reintegration working close collaboration disarmament reintegration officer allow effective evaluation programme impact n undertake periodic review disarmament reintegration activity ass effec tiveness efficiency achievement result compliance procedure n develop field manual standard procedure use local partner executing agency organize training n undertake periodic field visit inspect provision reinsertion benefit implementation reintegration project reporting n develop recommendation ongoing future activity lesson learned modifica tions implementation strategy arrangement partner nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "naccountabilities within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit monitoring evaluation officer responsible follow ing duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate", "SentID": 3467 }, { "ParagraphID": 1138, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\nAccountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Monitoring and Evaluation Officer is responsible for the follow\u00ad ing duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n develop monitoring and evaluation criteria for all aspects of disarmament and reinte\u00ad gration activities, as well as an overall strategy and monitoring calendar; \\n establish baselines for monitoring and evaluation purposes in the areas related to disarmament and reintegration, working in close collaboration with the disarmament and reintegration officers, to allow for effective evaluations of programme impact; \\n undertake periodic reviews of disarmament and reintegration activities to assess effec\u00ad tiveness, efficiency, achievement of results and compliance with procedures; \\n develop a field manual on standards and procedures for use by local partners and executing agencies, and organize training; \\n undertake periodic field visits to inspect the provision of reinsertion benefits and the implementation of reintegration projects, and reporting; \\n develop recommendations on ongoing and future activities, lessons learned, modifica\u00ad tions to implementation strategies and arrangements with partners. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \nAccountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Monitoring and Evaluation Officer is responsible for the follow\u00ad ing duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n develop monitoring and evaluation criteria for all aspects of disarmament and reinte\u00ad gration activities, as well as an overall strategy and monitoring calendar; \n establish baselines for monitoring and evaluation purposes in the areas related to disarmament and reintegration, working in close collaboration with the disarmament and reintegration officers, to allow for effective evaluations of programme impact; \n undertake periodic reviews of disarmament and reintegration activities to assess effec\u00ad tiveness, efficiency, achievement of results and compliance with procedures; \n develop a field manual on standards and procedures for use by local partners and executing agencies, and organize training; \n undertake periodic field visits to inspect the provision of reinsertion benefits and the implementation of reintegration projects, and reporting; \n develop recommendations on ongoing and future activities, lessons learned, modifica\u00ad tions to implementation strategies and arrangements with partners. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62443,7 +62443,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1138, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\nAccountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Monitoring and Evaluation Officer is responsible for the follow\u00ad ing duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n develop monitoring and evaluation criteria for all aspects of disarmament and reinte\u00ad gration activities, as well as an overall strategy and monitoring calendar; \\n establish baselines for monitoring and evaluation purposes in the areas related to disarmament and reintegration, working in close collaboration with the disarmament and reintegration officers, to allow for effective evaluations of programme impact; \\n undertake periodic reviews of disarmament and reintegration activities to assess effec\u00ad tiveness, efficiency, achievement of results and compliance with procedures; \\n develop a field manual on standards and procedures for use by local partners and executing agencies, and organize training; \\n undertake periodic field visits to inspect the provision of reinsertion benefits and the implementation of reintegration projects, and reporting; \\n develop recommendations on ongoing and future activities, lessons learned, modifica\u00ad tions to implementation strategies and arrangements with partners. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \nAccountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Monitoring and Evaluation Officer is responsible for the follow\u00ad ing duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n develop monitoring and evaluation criteria for all aspects of disarmament and reinte\u00ad gration activities, as well as an overall strategy and monitoring calendar; \n establish baselines for monitoring and evaluation purposes in the areas related to disarmament and reintegration, working in close collaboration with the disarmament and reintegration officers, to allow for effective evaluations of programme impact; \n undertake periodic reviews of disarmament and reintegration activities to assess effec\u00ad tiveness, efficiency, achievement of results and compliance with procedures; \n develop a field manual on standards and procedures for use by local partners and executing agencies, and organize training; \n undertake periodic field visits to inspect the provision of reinsertion benefits and the implementation of reintegration projects, and reporting; \n develop recommendations on ongoing and future activities, lessons learned, modifica\u00ad tions to implementation strategies and arrangements with partners. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62454,14 +62454,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.7: DDR Monitoring and Evaluation Officer (P2\u2013UNV) Draft generic job profile", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n develop monitoring and evaluation criteria for all aspects of disarmament and reinte\u00ad gration activities, as well as an overall strategy and monitoring calendar; \\n establish baselines for monitoring and evaluation purposes in the areas related to disarmament and reintegration, working in close collaboration with the disarmament and reintegration officers, to allow for effective evaluations of programme impact; \\n undertake periodic reviews of disarmament and reintegration activities to assess effec\u00ad tiveness, efficiency, achievement of results and compliance with procedures; \\n develop a field manual on standards and procedures for use by local partners and executing agencies, and organize training; \\n undertake periodic field visits to inspect the provision of reinsertion benefits and the implementation of reintegration projects, and reporting; \\n develop recommendations on ongoing and future activities, lessons learned, modifica\u00ad tions to implementation strategies and arrangements with partners.", + "Sentence": "\n\n develop monitoring and evaluation criteria for all aspects of disarmament and reinte\u00ad gration activities, as well as an overall strategy and monitoring calendar; \n establish baselines for monitoring and evaluation purposes in the areas related to disarmament and reintegration, working in close collaboration with the disarmament and reintegration officers, to allow for effective evaluations of programme impact; \n undertake periodic reviews of disarmament and reintegration activities to assess effec\u00ad tiveness, efficiency, achievement of results and compliance with procedures; \n develop a field manual on standards and procedures for use by local partners and executing agencies, and organize training; \n undertake periodic field visits to inspect the provision of reinsertion benefits and the implementation of reintegration projects, and reporting; \n develop recommendations on ongoing and future activities, lessons learned, modifica\u00ad tions to implementation strategies and arrangements with partners.", "newParagraph": "organizational setting reporting relationship position located peace operation depending organizational structure mission location post incumbent may report directly chief ddr unit senior official charge ddr activity field location naccountabilities within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit monitoring evaluation officer responsible follow ing duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn develop monitoring evaluation criterion aspect disarmament reinte gration activity well overall strategy monitoring calendar n establish baseline monitoring evaluation purpose area related disarmament reintegration working close collaboration disarmament reintegration officer allow effective evaluation programme impact n undertake periodic review disarmament reintegration activity ass effec tiveness efficiency achievement result compliance procedure n develop field manual standard procedure use local partner executing agency organize training n undertake periodic field visit inspect provision reinsertion benefit implementation reintegration project reporting n develop recommendation ongoing future activity lesson learned modifica tions implementation strategy arrangement partner nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "nn develop monitoring evaluation criterion aspect disarmament reinte gration activity well overall strategy monitoring calendar n establish baseline monitoring evaluation purpose area related disarmament reintegration working close collaboration disarmament reintegration officer allow effective evaluation programme impact n undertake periodic review disarmament reintegration activity ass effec tiveness efficiency achievement result compliance procedure n develop field manual standard procedure use local partner executing agency organize training n undertake periodic field visit inspect provision reinsertion benefit implementation reintegration project reporting n develop recommendation ongoing future activity lesson learned modifica tions implementation strategy arrangement partner", "SentID": 3469 }, { "ParagraphID": 1138, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\nAccountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Monitoring and Evaluation Officer is responsible for the follow\u00ad ing duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n develop monitoring and evaluation criteria for all aspects of disarmament and reinte\u00ad gration activities, as well as an overall strategy and monitoring calendar; \\n establish baselines for monitoring and evaluation purposes in the areas related to disarmament and reintegration, working in close collaboration with the disarmament and reintegration officers, to allow for effective evaluations of programme impact; \\n undertake periodic reviews of disarmament and reintegration activities to assess effec\u00ad tiveness, efficiency, achievement of results and compliance with procedures; \\n develop a field manual on standards and procedures for use by local partners and executing agencies, and organize training; \\n undertake periodic field visits to inspect the provision of reinsertion benefits and the implementation of reintegration projects, and reporting; \\n develop recommendations on ongoing and future activities, lessons learned, modifica\u00ad tions to implementation strategies and arrangements with partners. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \nAccountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Monitoring and Evaluation Officer is responsible for the follow\u00ad ing duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n develop monitoring and evaluation criteria for all aspects of disarmament and reinte\u00ad gration activities, as well as an overall strategy and monitoring calendar; \n establish baselines for monitoring and evaluation purposes in the areas related to disarmament and reintegration, working in close collaboration with the disarmament and reintegration officers, to allow for effective evaluations of programme impact; \n undertake periodic reviews of disarmament and reintegration activities to assess effec\u00ad tiveness, efficiency, achievement of results and compliance with procedures; \n develop a field manual on standards and procedures for use by local partners and executing agencies, and organize training; \n undertake periodic field visits to inspect the provision of reinsertion benefits and the implementation of reintegration projects, and reporting; \n develop recommendations on ongoing and future activities, lessons learned, modifica\u00ad tions to implementation strategies and arrangements with partners. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62472,14 +62472,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.7: DDR Monitoring and Evaluation Officer (P2\u2013UNV) Draft generic job profile", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "newParagraph": "organizational setting reporting relationship position located peace operation depending organizational structure mission location post incumbent may report directly chief ddr unit senior official charge ddr activity field location naccountabilities within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit monitoring evaluation officer responsible follow ing duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn develop monitoring evaluation criterion aspect disarmament reinte gration activity well overall strategy monitoring calendar n establish baseline monitoring evaluation purpose area related disarmament reintegration working close collaboration disarmament reintegration officer allow effective evaluation programme impact n undertake periodic review disarmament reintegration activity ass effec tiveness efficiency achievement result compliance procedure n develop field manual standard procedure use local partner executing agency organize training n undertake periodic field visit inspect provision reinsertion benefit implementation reintegration project reporting n develop recommendation ongoing future activity lesson learned modifica tions implementation strategy arrangement partner nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "SentID": 3470 }, { "ParagraphID": 1139, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62497,7 +62497,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1139, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62508,14 +62508,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.7: DDR Monitoring and Evaluation Officer (P2\u2013UNV) Draft generic job profile", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness.", + "Sentence": "\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness", "SentID": 3472 }, { "ParagraphID": 1139, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62526,14 +62526,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.7: DDR Monitoring and Evaluation Officer (P2\u2013UNV) Draft generic job profile", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives.", + "Sentence": "\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative", "SentID": 3473 }, { "ParagraphID": 1139, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62544,14 +62544,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.7: DDR Monitoring and Evaluation Officer (P2\u2013UNV) Draft generic job profile", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs.", + "Sentence": "\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need", "SentID": 3474 }, { "ParagraphID": 1139, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62562,14 +62562,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.7: DDR Monitoring and Evaluation Officer (P2\u2013UNV) Draft generic job profile", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials.", + "Sentence": "\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official", "SentID": 3475 }, { "ParagraphID": 1139, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62580,14 +62580,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.7: DDR Monitoring and Evaluation Officer (P2\u2013UNV) Draft generic job profile", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Sentence": "\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "SentID": 3476 }, { "ParagraphID": 1140, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of three years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience in results\u00adoriented programming and moni\u00ad toring and evaluation. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of three years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience in results\u00adoriented programming and moni\u00ad toring and evaluation. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62605,7 +62605,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1140, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of three years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience in results\u00adoriented programming and moni\u00ad toring and evaluation. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of three years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience in results\u00adoriented programming and moni\u00ad toring and evaluation. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62623,7 +62623,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1140, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of three years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience in results\u00adoriented programming and moni\u00ad toring and evaluation. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of three years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience in results\u00adoriented programming and moni\u00ad toring and evaluation. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62634,14 +62634,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.7: DDR Monitoring and Evaluation Officer (P2\u2013UNV) Draft generic job profile", "Heading3": "Qualifications", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Work experience: Minimum of three years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues.", + "Sentence": "\n Work experience: Minimum of three years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues.", "newParagraph": "education advanced university degree social science management economics business administration international development relevant field relevant combination academic qualification experience related area may accepted lieu advanced degree n work experience minimum three year substantial experience working post conflict crisis economic recovery issue experience result oriented programming moni toring evaluation n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "ProcessedSent": "n work experience minimum three year substantial experience working post conflict crisis economic recovery issue", "SentID": 3479 }, { "ParagraphID": 1140, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of three years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience in results\u00adoriented programming and moni\u00ad toring and evaluation. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of three years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience in results\u00adoriented programming and moni\u00ad toring and evaluation. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62659,7 +62659,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1140, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of three years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience in results\u00adoriented programming and moni\u00ad toring and evaluation. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of three years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience in results\u00adoriented programming and moni\u00ad toring and evaluation. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62670,7 +62670,7 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.7: DDR Monitoring and Evaluation Officer (P2\u2013UNV) Draft generic job profile", "Heading3": "Qualifications", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Sentence": "\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "newParagraph": "education advanced university degree social science management economics business administration international development relevant field relevant combination academic qualification experience related area may accepted lieu advanced degree n work experience minimum three year substantial experience working post conflict crisis economic recovery issue experience result oriented programming moni toring evaluation n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "ProcessedSent": "n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "SentID": 3481 @@ -62695,7 +62695,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1142, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n support the Chief and Deputy Chief of the DDR Unit in operational planning for the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, including developing the policies and programmes, as well as implementation targets and work plans; \\n undertake negotiations with armed forces and groups in order to create conditions for their entrance into the DDR programme; \\n undertake and organize risk and threat assessments, target group profiles, political fac\u00ad tors, security, and other factors affecting operations; \\n undertake planning of weapons collection activities, in conjunction with the military component of the peacekeeping mission; \\n undertake planning and management of the demobilization phase of the programme, which may include camp management, as well as short\u00adterm transitional support to demobilized combatants; \\n provide support for the development of joint programming frameworks on reintegration with the government and partner organizations, taking advantage of opportunities and synergies with economic recovery and community development programmes; \\n assist in the development of criteria for the selection of partners (local and interna\u00ad tional) for the implementation of reinsertion and reintegration activities; \\n liaise with other national and international actors on activities and initiatives related to reinsertion and reintegration; \\n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of beneficiaries for reinsertion and reintegration, as well as mapping of socio\u00adeconomic opportunities in other development projects, employment possibili\u00ad ties, etc.; \\n coordinate and facilitate the participation of local communities in the planning and implementation of reintegration assistance, using existing capacities at the local level and in close synergy with economic recovery and local development initiatives; \\n liaise closely with organizations and partners to develop assistance programmes for vulnerable groups, e.g., women and children; \\n facilitate the mobilization and organization of networks of local partners around the goals of socio\u00adeconomic reintegration and economic recovery, involving local NGOs, community\u00adbased organizations, private sector enterprises, and local authorities (com\u00ad munal and municipal); \\n supervise the undertaking of studies to determine reinsertion and reintegration benefits and implementation modalities; \\n ensure good coordination and information sharing with implementation partners and other organizations, as well as with other relevant sections of the mission; \\n ensure that DDR activities are well integrated and coordinated with the activities of other mission components (particularly communication and public information, mis\u00ad sion analysis, political, military and police components); \\n perform a liaison function with other national and international actors in matters related to DDR; \\n support development of appropriate legal frameworks on disarmament and weapons control. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n support the Chief and Deputy Chief of the DDR Unit in operational planning for the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, including developing the policies and programmes, as well as implementation targets and work plans; \n undertake negotiations with armed forces and groups in order to create conditions for their entrance into the DDR programme; \n undertake and organize risk and threat assessments, target group profiles, political fac\u00ad tors, security, and other factors affecting operations; \n undertake planning of weapons collection activities, in conjunction with the military component of the peacekeeping mission; \n undertake planning and management of the demobilization phase of the programme, which may include camp management, as well as short\u00adterm transitional support to demobilized combatants; \n provide support for the development of joint programming frameworks on reintegration with the government and partner organizations, taking advantage of opportunities and synergies with economic recovery and community development programmes; \n assist in the development of criteria for the selection of partners (local and interna\u00ad tional) for the implementation of reinsertion and reintegration activities; \n liaise with other national and international actors on activities and initiatives related to reinsertion and reintegration; \n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of beneficiaries for reinsertion and reintegration, as well as mapping of socio\u00adeconomic opportunities in other development projects, employment possibili\u00ad ties, etc.; \n coordinate and facilitate the participation of local communities in the planning and implementation of reintegration assistance, using existing capacities at the local level and in close synergy with economic recovery and local development initiatives; \n liaise closely with organizations and partners to develop assistance programmes for vulnerable groups, e.g., women and children; \n facilitate the mobilization and organization of networks of local partners around the goals of socio\u00adeconomic reintegration and economic recovery, involving local NGOs, community\u00adbased organizations, private sector enterprises, and local authorities (com\u00ad munal and municipal); \n supervise the undertaking of studies to determine reinsertion and reintegration benefits and implementation modalities; \n ensure good coordination and information sharing with implementation partners and other organizations, as well as with other relevant sections of the mission; \n ensure that DDR activities are well integrated and coordinated with the activities of other mission components (particularly communication and public information, mis\u00ad sion analysis, political, military and police components); \n perform a liaison function with other national and international actors in matters related to DDR; \n support development of appropriate legal frameworks on disarmament and weapons control. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62713,7 +62713,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1142, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n support the Chief and Deputy Chief of the DDR Unit in operational planning for the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, including developing the policies and programmes, as well as implementation targets and work plans; \\n undertake negotiations with armed forces and groups in order to create conditions for their entrance into the DDR programme; \\n undertake and organize risk and threat assessments, target group profiles, political fac\u00ad tors, security, and other factors affecting operations; \\n undertake planning of weapons collection activities, in conjunction with the military component of the peacekeeping mission; \\n undertake planning and management of the demobilization phase of the programme, which may include camp management, as well as short\u00adterm transitional support to demobilized combatants; \\n provide support for the development of joint programming frameworks on reintegration with the government and partner organizations, taking advantage of opportunities and synergies with economic recovery and community development programmes; \\n assist in the development of criteria for the selection of partners (local and interna\u00ad tional) for the implementation of reinsertion and reintegration activities; \\n liaise with other national and international actors on activities and initiatives related to reinsertion and reintegration; \\n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of beneficiaries for reinsertion and reintegration, as well as mapping of socio\u00adeconomic opportunities in other development projects, employment possibili\u00ad ties, etc.; \\n coordinate and facilitate the participation of local communities in the planning and implementation of reintegration assistance, using existing capacities at the local level and in close synergy with economic recovery and local development initiatives; \\n liaise closely with organizations and partners to develop assistance programmes for vulnerable groups, e.g., women and children; \\n facilitate the mobilization and organization of networks of local partners around the goals of socio\u00adeconomic reintegration and economic recovery, involving local NGOs, community\u00adbased organizations, private sector enterprises, and local authorities (com\u00ad munal and municipal); \\n supervise the undertaking of studies to determine reinsertion and reintegration benefits and implementation modalities; \\n ensure good coordination and information sharing with implementation partners and other organizations, as well as with other relevant sections of the mission; \\n ensure that DDR activities are well integrated and coordinated with the activities of other mission components (particularly communication and public information, mis\u00ad sion analysis, political, military and police components); \\n perform a liaison function with other national and international actors in matters related to DDR; \\n support development of appropriate legal frameworks on disarmament and weapons control. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n support the Chief and Deputy Chief of the DDR Unit in operational planning for the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, including developing the policies and programmes, as well as implementation targets and work plans; \n undertake negotiations with armed forces and groups in order to create conditions for their entrance into the DDR programme; \n undertake and organize risk and threat assessments, target group profiles, political fac\u00ad tors, security, and other factors affecting operations; \n undertake planning of weapons collection activities, in conjunction with the military component of the peacekeeping mission; \n undertake planning and management of the demobilization phase of the programme, which may include camp management, as well as short\u00adterm transitional support to demobilized combatants; \n provide support for the development of joint programming frameworks on reintegration with the government and partner organizations, taking advantage of opportunities and synergies with economic recovery and community development programmes; \n assist in the development of criteria for the selection of partners (local and interna\u00ad tional) for the implementation of reinsertion and reintegration activities; \n liaise with other national and international actors on activities and initiatives related to reinsertion and reintegration; \n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of beneficiaries for reinsertion and reintegration, as well as mapping of socio\u00adeconomic opportunities in other development projects, employment possibili\u00ad ties, etc.; \n coordinate and facilitate the participation of local communities in the planning and implementation of reintegration assistance, using existing capacities at the local level and in close synergy with economic recovery and local development initiatives; \n liaise closely with organizations and partners to develop assistance programmes for vulnerable groups, e.g., women and children; \n facilitate the mobilization and organization of networks of local partners around the goals of socio\u00adeconomic reintegration and economic recovery, involving local NGOs, community\u00adbased organizations, private sector enterprises, and local authorities (com\u00ad munal and municipal); \n supervise the undertaking of studies to determine reinsertion and reintegration benefits and implementation modalities; \n ensure good coordination and information sharing with implementation partners and other organizations, as well as with other relevant sections of the mission; \n ensure that DDR activities are well integrated and coordinated with the activities of other mission components (particularly communication and public information, mis\u00ad sion analysis, political, military and police components); \n perform a liaison function with other national and international actors in matters related to DDR; \n support development of appropriate legal frameworks on disarmament and weapons control. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62731,7 +62731,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1142, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n support the Chief and Deputy Chief of the DDR Unit in operational planning for the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, including developing the policies and programmes, as well as implementation targets and work plans; \\n undertake negotiations with armed forces and groups in order to create conditions for their entrance into the DDR programme; \\n undertake and organize risk and threat assessments, target group profiles, political fac\u00ad tors, security, and other factors affecting operations; \\n undertake planning of weapons collection activities, in conjunction with the military component of the peacekeeping mission; \\n undertake planning and management of the demobilization phase of the programme, which may include camp management, as well as short\u00adterm transitional support to demobilized combatants; \\n provide support for the development of joint programming frameworks on reintegration with the government and partner organizations, taking advantage of opportunities and synergies with economic recovery and community development programmes; \\n assist in the development of criteria for the selection of partners (local and interna\u00ad tional) for the implementation of reinsertion and reintegration activities; \\n liaise with other national and international actors on activities and initiatives related to reinsertion and reintegration; \\n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of beneficiaries for reinsertion and reintegration, as well as mapping of socio\u00adeconomic opportunities in other development projects, employment possibili\u00ad ties, etc.; \\n coordinate and facilitate the participation of local communities in the planning and implementation of reintegration assistance, using existing capacities at the local level and in close synergy with economic recovery and local development initiatives; \\n liaise closely with organizations and partners to develop assistance programmes for vulnerable groups, e.g., women and children; \\n facilitate the mobilization and organization of networks of local partners around the goals of socio\u00adeconomic reintegration and economic recovery, involving local NGOs, community\u00adbased organizations, private sector enterprises, and local authorities (com\u00ad munal and municipal); \\n supervise the undertaking of studies to determine reinsertion and reintegration benefits and implementation modalities; \\n ensure good coordination and information sharing with implementation partners and other organizations, as well as with other relevant sections of the mission; \\n ensure that DDR activities are well integrated and coordinated with the activities of other mission components (particularly communication and public information, mis\u00ad sion analysis, political, military and police components); \\n perform a liaison function with other national and international actors in matters related to DDR; \\n support development of appropriate legal frameworks on disarmament and weapons control. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n support the Chief and Deputy Chief of the DDR Unit in operational planning for the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, including developing the policies and programmes, as well as implementation targets and work plans; \n undertake negotiations with armed forces and groups in order to create conditions for their entrance into the DDR programme; \n undertake and organize risk and threat assessments, target group profiles, political fac\u00ad tors, security, and other factors affecting operations; \n undertake planning of weapons collection activities, in conjunction with the military component of the peacekeeping mission; \n undertake planning and management of the demobilization phase of the programme, which may include camp management, as well as short\u00adterm transitional support to demobilized combatants; \n provide support for the development of joint programming frameworks on reintegration with the government and partner organizations, taking advantage of opportunities and synergies with economic recovery and community development programmes; \n assist in the development of criteria for the selection of partners (local and interna\u00ad tional) for the implementation of reinsertion and reintegration activities; \n liaise with other national and international actors on activities and initiatives related to reinsertion and reintegration; \n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of beneficiaries for reinsertion and reintegration, as well as mapping of socio\u00adeconomic opportunities in other development projects, employment possibili\u00ad ties, etc.; \n coordinate and facilitate the participation of local communities in the planning and implementation of reintegration assistance, using existing capacities at the local level and in close synergy with economic recovery and local development initiatives; \n liaise closely with organizations and partners to develop assistance programmes for vulnerable groups, e.g., women and children; \n facilitate the mobilization and organization of networks of local partners around the goals of socio\u00adeconomic reintegration and economic recovery, involving local NGOs, community\u00adbased organizations, private sector enterprises, and local authorities (com\u00ad munal and municipal); \n supervise the undertaking of studies to determine reinsertion and reintegration benefits and implementation modalities; \n ensure good coordination and information sharing with implementation partners and other organizations, as well as with other relevant sections of the mission; \n ensure that DDR activities are well integrated and coordinated with the activities of other mission components (particularly communication and public information, mis\u00ad sion analysis, political, military and police components); \n perform a liaison function with other national and international actors in matters related to DDR; \n support development of appropriate legal frameworks on disarmament and weapons control. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62742,14 +62742,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.8: DDR Officer (P4\u2013P3, International)", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate.", + "Sentence": "\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate.", "newParagraph": "organizational setting reporting relationship position located peace operation depending organizational structure mission location post incumbent may report directly chief ddr unit senior official charge ddr activity field location n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit ddr officer responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn support chief deputy chief ddr unit operational planning disarmament demobilization reintegration including developing policy programme well implementation target work plan n undertake negotiation armed force group order create condition entrance ddr programme n undertake organize risk threat assessment target group profile political fac tor security factor affecting operation n undertake planning weapon collection activity conjunction military component peacekeeping mission n undertake planning management demobilization phase programme may include camp management well short term transitional support demobilized combatant n provide support development joint programming framework reintegration government partner organization taking advantage opportunity synergy economic recovery community development programme n assist development criterion selection partner local interna tional implementation reinsertion reintegration activity n liaise national international actor activity initiative related reinsertion reintegration n supervise development appropriate mechanism system registration tracking beneficiary reinsertion reintegration well mapping socio economic opportunity development project employment possibili tie etc n coordinate facilitate participation local community planning implementation reintegration assistance using existing capacity local level close synergy economic recovery local development initiative n liaise closely organization partner develop assistance programme vulnerable group eg woman child n facilitate mobilization organization network local partner around goal socio economic reintegration economic recovery involving local ngo community based organization private sector enterprise local authority com munal municipal n supervise undertaking study determine reinsertion reintegration benefit implementation modality n ensure good coordination information sharing implementation partner organization well relevant section mission n ensure ddr activity well integrated coordinated activity mission component particularly communication public information mi sion analysis political military police component n perform liaison function national international actor matter related ddr n support development appropriate legal framework disarmament weapon control nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit ddr officer responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate", "SentID": 3485 }, { "ParagraphID": 1142, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n support the Chief and Deputy Chief of the DDR Unit in operational planning for the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, including developing the policies and programmes, as well as implementation targets and work plans; \\n undertake negotiations with armed forces and groups in order to create conditions for their entrance into the DDR programme; \\n undertake and organize risk and threat assessments, target group profiles, political fac\u00ad tors, security, and other factors affecting operations; \\n undertake planning of weapons collection activities, in conjunction with the military component of the peacekeeping mission; \\n undertake planning and management of the demobilization phase of the programme, which may include camp management, as well as short\u00adterm transitional support to demobilized combatants; \\n provide support for the development of joint programming frameworks on reintegration with the government and partner organizations, taking advantage of opportunities and synergies with economic recovery and community development programmes; \\n assist in the development of criteria for the selection of partners (local and interna\u00ad tional) for the implementation of reinsertion and reintegration activities; \\n liaise with other national and international actors on activities and initiatives related to reinsertion and reintegration; \\n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of beneficiaries for reinsertion and reintegration, as well as mapping of socio\u00adeconomic opportunities in other development projects, employment possibili\u00ad ties, etc.; \\n coordinate and facilitate the participation of local communities in the planning and implementation of reintegration assistance, using existing capacities at the local level and in close synergy with economic recovery and local development initiatives; \\n liaise closely with organizations and partners to develop assistance programmes for vulnerable groups, e.g., women and children; \\n facilitate the mobilization and organization of networks of local partners around the goals of socio\u00adeconomic reintegration and economic recovery, involving local NGOs, community\u00adbased organizations, private sector enterprises, and local authorities (com\u00ad munal and municipal); \\n supervise the undertaking of studies to determine reinsertion and reintegration benefits and implementation modalities; \\n ensure good coordination and information sharing with implementation partners and other organizations, as well as with other relevant sections of the mission; \\n ensure that DDR activities are well integrated and coordinated with the activities of other mission components (particularly communication and public information, mis\u00ad sion analysis, political, military and police components); \\n perform a liaison function with other national and international actors in matters related to DDR; \\n support development of appropriate legal frameworks on disarmament and weapons control. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n support the Chief and Deputy Chief of the DDR Unit in operational planning for the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, including developing the policies and programmes, as well as implementation targets and work plans; \n undertake negotiations with armed forces and groups in order to create conditions for their entrance into the DDR programme; \n undertake and organize risk and threat assessments, target group profiles, political fac\u00ad tors, security, and other factors affecting operations; \n undertake planning of weapons collection activities, in conjunction with the military component of the peacekeeping mission; \n undertake planning and management of the demobilization phase of the programme, which may include camp management, as well as short\u00adterm transitional support to demobilized combatants; \n provide support for the development of joint programming frameworks on reintegration with the government and partner organizations, taking advantage of opportunities and synergies with economic recovery and community development programmes; \n assist in the development of criteria for the selection of partners (local and interna\u00ad tional) for the implementation of reinsertion and reintegration activities; \n liaise with other national and international actors on activities and initiatives related to reinsertion and reintegration; \n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of beneficiaries for reinsertion and reintegration, as well as mapping of socio\u00adeconomic opportunities in other development projects, employment possibili\u00ad ties, etc.; \n coordinate and facilitate the participation of local communities in the planning and implementation of reintegration assistance, using existing capacities at the local level and in close synergy with economic recovery and local development initiatives; \n liaise closely with organizations and partners to develop assistance programmes for vulnerable groups, e.g., women and children; \n facilitate the mobilization and organization of networks of local partners around the goals of socio\u00adeconomic reintegration and economic recovery, involving local NGOs, community\u00adbased organizations, private sector enterprises, and local authorities (com\u00ad munal and municipal); \n supervise the undertaking of studies to determine reinsertion and reintegration benefits and implementation modalities; \n ensure good coordination and information sharing with implementation partners and other organizations, as well as with other relevant sections of the mission; \n ensure that DDR activities are well integrated and coordinated with the activities of other mission components (particularly communication and public information, mis\u00ad sion analysis, political, military and police components); \n perform a liaison function with other national and international actors in matters related to DDR; \n support development of appropriate legal frameworks on disarmament and weapons control. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62767,7 +62767,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1142, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n support the Chief and Deputy Chief of the DDR Unit in operational planning for the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, including developing the policies and programmes, as well as implementation targets and work plans; \\n undertake negotiations with armed forces and groups in order to create conditions for their entrance into the DDR programme; \\n undertake and organize risk and threat assessments, target group profiles, political fac\u00ad tors, security, and other factors affecting operations; \\n undertake planning of weapons collection activities, in conjunction with the military component of the peacekeeping mission; \\n undertake planning and management of the demobilization phase of the programme, which may include camp management, as well as short\u00adterm transitional support to demobilized combatants; \\n provide support for the development of joint programming frameworks on reintegration with the government and partner organizations, taking advantage of opportunities and synergies with economic recovery and community development programmes; \\n assist in the development of criteria for the selection of partners (local and interna\u00ad tional) for the implementation of reinsertion and reintegration activities; \\n liaise with other national and international actors on activities and initiatives related to reinsertion and reintegration; \\n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of beneficiaries for reinsertion and reintegration, as well as mapping of socio\u00adeconomic opportunities in other development projects, employment possibili\u00ad ties, etc.; \\n coordinate and facilitate the participation of local communities in the planning and implementation of reintegration assistance, using existing capacities at the local level and in close synergy with economic recovery and local development initiatives; \\n liaise closely with organizations and partners to develop assistance programmes for vulnerable groups, e.g., women and children; \\n facilitate the mobilization and organization of networks of local partners around the goals of socio\u00adeconomic reintegration and economic recovery, involving local NGOs, community\u00adbased organizations, private sector enterprises, and local authorities (com\u00ad munal and municipal); \\n supervise the undertaking of studies to determine reinsertion and reintegration benefits and implementation modalities; \\n ensure good coordination and information sharing with implementation partners and other organizations, as well as with other relevant sections of the mission; \\n ensure that DDR activities are well integrated and coordinated with the activities of other mission components (particularly communication and public information, mis\u00ad sion analysis, political, military and police components); \\n perform a liaison function with other national and international actors in matters related to DDR; \\n support development of appropriate legal frameworks on disarmament and weapons control. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n support the Chief and Deputy Chief of the DDR Unit in operational planning for the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, including developing the policies and programmes, as well as implementation targets and work plans; \n undertake negotiations with armed forces and groups in order to create conditions for their entrance into the DDR programme; \n undertake and organize risk and threat assessments, target group profiles, political fac\u00ad tors, security, and other factors affecting operations; \n undertake planning of weapons collection activities, in conjunction with the military component of the peacekeeping mission; \n undertake planning and management of the demobilization phase of the programme, which may include camp management, as well as short\u00adterm transitional support to demobilized combatants; \n provide support for the development of joint programming frameworks on reintegration with the government and partner organizations, taking advantage of opportunities and synergies with economic recovery and community development programmes; \n assist in the development of criteria for the selection of partners (local and interna\u00ad tional) for the implementation of reinsertion and reintegration activities; \n liaise with other national and international actors on activities and initiatives related to reinsertion and reintegration; \n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of beneficiaries for reinsertion and reintegration, as well as mapping of socio\u00adeconomic opportunities in other development projects, employment possibili\u00ad ties, etc.; \n coordinate and facilitate the participation of local communities in the planning and implementation of reintegration assistance, using existing capacities at the local level and in close synergy with economic recovery and local development initiatives; \n liaise closely with organizations and partners to develop assistance programmes for vulnerable groups, e.g., women and children; \n facilitate the mobilization and organization of networks of local partners around the goals of socio\u00adeconomic reintegration and economic recovery, involving local NGOs, community\u00adbased organizations, private sector enterprises, and local authorities (com\u00ad munal and municipal); \n supervise the undertaking of studies to determine reinsertion and reintegration benefits and implementation modalities; \n ensure good coordination and information sharing with implementation partners and other organizations, as well as with other relevant sections of the mission; \n ensure that DDR activities are well integrated and coordinated with the activities of other mission components (particularly communication and public information, mis\u00ad sion analysis, political, military and police components); \n perform a liaison function with other national and international actors in matters related to DDR; \n support development of appropriate legal frameworks on disarmament and weapons control. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62778,14 +62778,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.8: DDR Officer (P4\u2013P3, International)", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n support the Chief and Deputy Chief of the DDR Unit in operational planning for the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, including developing the policies and programmes, as well as implementation targets and work plans; \\n undertake negotiations with armed forces and groups in order to create conditions for their entrance into the DDR programme; \\n undertake and organize risk and threat assessments, target group profiles, political fac\u00ad tors, security, and other factors affecting operations; \\n undertake planning of weapons collection activities, in conjunction with the military component of the peacekeeping mission; \\n undertake planning and management of the demobilization phase of the programme, which may include camp management, as well as short\u00adterm transitional support to demobilized combatants; \\n provide support for the development of joint programming frameworks on reintegration with the government and partner organizations, taking advantage of opportunities and synergies with economic recovery and community development programmes; \\n assist in the development of criteria for the selection of partners (local and interna\u00ad tional) for the implementation of reinsertion and reintegration activities; \\n liaise with other national and international actors on activities and initiatives related to reinsertion and reintegration; \\n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of beneficiaries for reinsertion and reintegration, as well as mapping of socio\u00adeconomic opportunities in other development projects, employment possibili\u00ad ties, etc.", + "Sentence": "\n\n support the Chief and Deputy Chief of the DDR Unit in operational planning for the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, including developing the policies and programmes, as well as implementation targets and work plans; \n undertake negotiations with armed forces and groups in order to create conditions for their entrance into the DDR programme; \n undertake and organize risk and threat assessments, target group profiles, political fac\u00ad tors, security, and other factors affecting operations; \n undertake planning of weapons collection activities, in conjunction with the military component of the peacekeeping mission; \n undertake planning and management of the demobilization phase of the programme, which may include camp management, as well as short\u00adterm transitional support to demobilized combatants; \n provide support for the development of joint programming frameworks on reintegration with the government and partner organizations, taking advantage of opportunities and synergies with economic recovery and community development programmes; \n assist in the development of criteria for the selection of partners (local and interna\u00ad tional) for the implementation of reinsertion and reintegration activities; \n liaise with other national and international actors on activities and initiatives related to reinsertion and reintegration; \n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of beneficiaries for reinsertion and reintegration, as well as mapping of socio\u00adeconomic opportunities in other development projects, employment possibili\u00ad ties, etc.", "newParagraph": "organizational setting reporting relationship position located peace operation depending organizational structure mission location post incumbent may report directly chief ddr unit senior official charge ddr activity field location n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit ddr officer responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn support chief deputy chief ddr unit operational planning disarmament demobilization reintegration including developing policy programme well implementation target work plan n undertake negotiation armed force group order create condition entrance ddr programme n undertake organize risk threat assessment target group profile political fac tor security factor affecting operation n undertake planning weapon collection activity conjunction military component peacekeeping mission n undertake planning management demobilization phase programme may include camp management well short term transitional support demobilized combatant n provide support development joint programming framework reintegration government partner organization taking advantage opportunity synergy economic recovery community development programme n assist development criterion selection partner local interna tional implementation reinsertion reintegration activity n liaise national international actor activity initiative related reinsertion reintegration n supervise development appropriate mechanism system registration tracking beneficiary reinsertion reintegration well mapping socio economic opportunity development project employment possibili tie etc n coordinate facilitate participation local community planning implementation reintegration assistance using existing capacity local level close synergy economic recovery local development initiative n liaise closely organization partner develop assistance programme vulnerable group eg woman child n facilitate mobilization organization network local partner around goal socio economic reintegration economic recovery involving local ngo community based organization private sector enterprise local authority com munal municipal n supervise undertaking study determine reinsertion reintegration benefit implementation modality n ensure good coordination information sharing implementation partner organization well relevant section mission n ensure ddr activity well integrated coordinated activity mission component particularly communication public information mi sion analysis political military police component n perform liaison function national international actor matter related ddr n support development appropriate legal framework disarmament weapon control nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "nn support chief deputy chief ddr unit operational planning disarmament demobilization reintegration including developing policy programme well implementation target work plan n undertake negotiation armed force group order create condition entrance ddr programme n undertake organize risk threat assessment target group profile political fac tor security factor affecting operation n undertake planning weapon collection activity conjunction military component peacekeeping mission n undertake planning management demobilization phase programme may include camp management well short term transitional support demobilized combatant n provide support development joint programming framework reintegration government partner organization taking advantage opportunity synergy economic recovery community development programme n assist development criterion selection partner local interna tional implementation reinsertion reintegration activity n liaise national international actor activity initiative related reinsertion reintegration n supervise development appropriate mechanism system registration tracking beneficiary reinsertion reintegration well mapping socio economic opportunity development project employment possibili tie etc", "SentID": 3487 }, { "ParagraphID": 1142, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n support the Chief and Deputy Chief of the DDR Unit in operational planning for the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, including developing the policies and programmes, as well as implementation targets and work plans; \\n undertake negotiations with armed forces and groups in order to create conditions for their entrance into the DDR programme; \\n undertake and organize risk and threat assessments, target group profiles, political fac\u00ad tors, security, and other factors affecting operations; \\n undertake planning of weapons collection activities, in conjunction with the military component of the peacekeeping mission; \\n undertake planning and management of the demobilization phase of the programme, which may include camp management, as well as short\u00adterm transitional support to demobilized combatants; \\n provide support for the development of joint programming frameworks on reintegration with the government and partner organizations, taking advantage of opportunities and synergies with economic recovery and community development programmes; \\n assist in the development of criteria for the selection of partners (local and interna\u00ad tional) for the implementation of reinsertion and reintegration activities; \\n liaise with other national and international actors on activities and initiatives related to reinsertion and reintegration; \\n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of beneficiaries for reinsertion and reintegration, as well as mapping of socio\u00adeconomic opportunities in other development projects, employment possibili\u00ad ties, etc.; \\n coordinate and facilitate the participation of local communities in the planning and implementation of reintegration assistance, using existing capacities at the local level and in close synergy with economic recovery and local development initiatives; \\n liaise closely with organizations and partners to develop assistance programmes for vulnerable groups, e.g., women and children; \\n facilitate the mobilization and organization of networks of local partners around the goals of socio\u00adeconomic reintegration and economic recovery, involving local NGOs, community\u00adbased organizations, private sector enterprises, and local authorities (com\u00ad munal and municipal); \\n supervise the undertaking of studies to determine reinsertion and reintegration benefits and implementation modalities; \\n ensure good coordination and information sharing with implementation partners and other organizations, as well as with other relevant sections of the mission; \\n ensure that DDR activities are well integrated and coordinated with the activities of other mission components (particularly communication and public information, mis\u00ad sion analysis, political, military and police components); \\n perform a liaison function with other national and international actors in matters related to DDR; \\n support development of appropriate legal frameworks on disarmament and weapons control. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n support the Chief and Deputy Chief of the DDR Unit in operational planning for the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, including developing the policies and programmes, as well as implementation targets and work plans; \n undertake negotiations with armed forces and groups in order to create conditions for their entrance into the DDR programme; \n undertake and organize risk and threat assessments, target group profiles, political fac\u00ad tors, security, and other factors affecting operations; \n undertake planning of weapons collection activities, in conjunction with the military component of the peacekeeping mission; \n undertake planning and management of the demobilization phase of the programme, which may include camp management, as well as short\u00adterm transitional support to demobilized combatants; \n provide support for the development of joint programming frameworks on reintegration with the government and partner organizations, taking advantage of opportunities and synergies with economic recovery and community development programmes; \n assist in the development of criteria for the selection of partners (local and interna\u00ad tional) for the implementation of reinsertion and reintegration activities; \n liaise with other national and international actors on activities and initiatives related to reinsertion and reintegration; \n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of beneficiaries for reinsertion and reintegration, as well as mapping of socio\u00adeconomic opportunities in other development projects, employment possibili\u00ad ties, etc.; \n coordinate and facilitate the participation of local communities in the planning and implementation of reintegration assistance, using existing capacities at the local level and in close synergy with economic recovery and local development initiatives; \n liaise closely with organizations and partners to develop assistance programmes for vulnerable groups, e.g., women and children; \n facilitate the mobilization and organization of networks of local partners around the goals of socio\u00adeconomic reintegration and economic recovery, involving local NGOs, community\u00adbased organizations, private sector enterprises, and local authorities (com\u00ad munal and municipal); \n supervise the undertaking of studies to determine reinsertion and reintegration benefits and implementation modalities; \n ensure good coordination and information sharing with implementation partners and other organizations, as well as with other relevant sections of the mission; \n ensure that DDR activities are well integrated and coordinated with the activities of other mission components (particularly communication and public information, mis\u00ad sion analysis, political, military and police components); \n perform a liaison function with other national and international actors in matters related to DDR; \n support development of appropriate legal frameworks on disarmament and weapons control. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62796,14 +62796,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.8: DDR Officer (P4\u2013P3, International)", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "; \\n coordinate and facilitate the participation of local communities in the planning and implementation of reintegration assistance, using existing capacities at the local level and in close synergy with economic recovery and local development initiatives; \\n liaise closely with organizations and partners to develop assistance programmes for vulnerable groups, e.g., women and children; \\n facilitate the mobilization and organization of networks of local partners around the goals of socio\u00adeconomic reintegration and economic recovery, involving local NGOs, community\u00adbased organizations, private sector enterprises, and local authorities (com\u00ad munal and municipal); \\n supervise the undertaking of studies to determine reinsertion and reintegration benefits and implementation modalities; \\n ensure good coordination and information sharing with implementation partners and other organizations, as well as with other relevant sections of the mission; \\n ensure that DDR activities are well integrated and coordinated with the activities of other mission components (particularly communication and public information, mis\u00ad sion analysis, political, military and police components); \\n perform a liaison function with other national and international actors in matters related to DDR; \\n support development of appropriate legal frameworks on disarmament and weapons control.", + "Sentence": "; \n coordinate and facilitate the participation of local communities in the planning and implementation of reintegration assistance, using existing capacities at the local level and in close synergy with economic recovery and local development initiatives; \n liaise closely with organizations and partners to develop assistance programmes for vulnerable groups, e.g., women and children; \n facilitate the mobilization and organization of networks of local partners around the goals of socio\u00adeconomic reintegration and economic recovery, involving local NGOs, community\u00adbased organizations, private sector enterprises, and local authorities (com\u00ad munal and municipal); \n supervise the undertaking of studies to determine reinsertion and reintegration benefits and implementation modalities; \n ensure good coordination and information sharing with implementation partners and other organizations, as well as with other relevant sections of the mission; \n ensure that DDR activities are well integrated and coordinated with the activities of other mission components (particularly communication and public information, mis\u00ad sion analysis, political, military and police components); \n perform a liaison function with other national and international actors in matters related to DDR; \n support development of appropriate legal frameworks on disarmament and weapons control.", "newParagraph": "organizational setting reporting relationship position located peace operation depending organizational structure mission location post incumbent may report directly chief ddr unit senior official charge ddr activity field location n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit ddr officer responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn support chief deputy chief ddr unit operational planning disarmament demobilization reintegration including developing policy programme well implementation target work plan n undertake negotiation armed force group order create condition entrance ddr programme n undertake organize risk threat assessment target group profile political fac tor security factor affecting operation n undertake planning weapon collection activity conjunction military component peacekeeping mission n undertake planning management demobilization phase programme may include camp management well short term transitional support demobilized combatant n provide support development joint programming framework reintegration government partner organization taking advantage opportunity synergy economic recovery community development programme n assist development criterion selection partner local interna tional implementation reinsertion reintegration activity n liaise national international actor activity initiative related reinsertion reintegration n supervise development appropriate mechanism system registration tracking beneficiary reinsertion reintegration well mapping socio economic opportunity development project employment possibili tie etc n coordinate facilitate participation local community planning implementation reintegration assistance using existing capacity local level close synergy economic recovery local development initiative n liaise closely organization partner develop assistance programme vulnerable group eg woman child n facilitate mobilization organization network local partner around goal socio economic reintegration economic recovery involving local ngo community based organization private sector enterprise local authority com munal municipal n supervise undertaking study determine reinsertion reintegration benefit implementation modality n ensure good coordination information sharing implementation partner organization well relevant section mission n ensure ddr activity well integrated coordinated activity mission component particularly communication public information mi sion analysis political military police component n perform liaison function national international actor matter related ddr n support development appropriate legal framework disarmament weapon control nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": " n coordinate facilitate participation local community planning implementation reintegration assistance using existing capacity local level close synergy economic recovery local development initiative n liaise closely organization partner develop assistance programme vulnerable group eg woman child n facilitate mobilization organization network local partner around goal socio economic reintegration economic recovery involving local ngo community based organization private sector enterprise local authority com munal municipal n supervise undertaking study determine reinsertion reintegration benefit implementation modality n ensure good coordination information sharing implementation partner organization well relevant section mission n ensure ddr activity well integrated coordinated activity mission component particularly communication public information mi sion analysis political military police component n perform liaison function national international actor matter related ddr n support development appropriate legal framework disarmament weapon control", "SentID": 3488 }, { "ParagraphID": 1142, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n support the Chief and Deputy Chief of the DDR Unit in operational planning for the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, including developing the policies and programmes, as well as implementation targets and work plans; \\n undertake negotiations with armed forces and groups in order to create conditions for their entrance into the DDR programme; \\n undertake and organize risk and threat assessments, target group profiles, political fac\u00ad tors, security, and other factors affecting operations; \\n undertake planning of weapons collection activities, in conjunction with the military component of the peacekeeping mission; \\n undertake planning and management of the demobilization phase of the programme, which may include camp management, as well as short\u00adterm transitional support to demobilized combatants; \\n provide support for the development of joint programming frameworks on reintegration with the government and partner organizations, taking advantage of opportunities and synergies with economic recovery and community development programmes; \\n assist in the development of criteria for the selection of partners (local and interna\u00ad tional) for the implementation of reinsertion and reintegration activities; \\n liaise with other national and international actors on activities and initiatives related to reinsertion and reintegration; \\n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of beneficiaries for reinsertion and reintegration, as well as mapping of socio\u00adeconomic opportunities in other development projects, employment possibili\u00ad ties, etc.; \\n coordinate and facilitate the participation of local communities in the planning and implementation of reintegration assistance, using existing capacities at the local level and in close synergy with economic recovery and local development initiatives; \\n liaise closely with organizations and partners to develop assistance programmes for vulnerable groups, e.g., women and children; \\n facilitate the mobilization and organization of networks of local partners around the goals of socio\u00adeconomic reintegration and economic recovery, involving local NGOs, community\u00adbased organizations, private sector enterprises, and local authorities (com\u00ad munal and municipal); \\n supervise the undertaking of studies to determine reinsertion and reintegration benefits and implementation modalities; \\n ensure good coordination and information sharing with implementation partners and other organizations, as well as with other relevant sections of the mission; \\n ensure that DDR activities are well integrated and coordinated with the activities of other mission components (particularly communication and public information, mis\u00ad sion analysis, political, military and police components); \\n perform a liaison function with other national and international actors in matters related to DDR; \\n support development of appropriate legal frameworks on disarmament and weapons control. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n support the Chief and Deputy Chief of the DDR Unit in operational planning for the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, including developing the policies and programmes, as well as implementation targets and work plans; \n undertake negotiations with armed forces and groups in order to create conditions for their entrance into the DDR programme; \n undertake and organize risk and threat assessments, target group profiles, political fac\u00ad tors, security, and other factors affecting operations; \n undertake planning of weapons collection activities, in conjunction with the military component of the peacekeeping mission; \n undertake planning and management of the demobilization phase of the programme, which may include camp management, as well as short\u00adterm transitional support to demobilized combatants; \n provide support for the development of joint programming frameworks on reintegration with the government and partner organizations, taking advantage of opportunities and synergies with economic recovery and community development programmes; \n assist in the development of criteria for the selection of partners (local and interna\u00ad tional) for the implementation of reinsertion and reintegration activities; \n liaise with other national and international actors on activities and initiatives related to reinsertion and reintegration; \n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of beneficiaries for reinsertion and reintegration, as well as mapping of socio\u00adeconomic opportunities in other development projects, employment possibili\u00ad ties, etc.; \n coordinate and facilitate the participation of local communities in the planning and implementation of reintegration assistance, using existing capacities at the local level and in close synergy with economic recovery and local development initiatives; \n liaise closely with organizations and partners to develop assistance programmes for vulnerable groups, e.g., women and children; \n facilitate the mobilization and organization of networks of local partners around the goals of socio\u00adeconomic reintegration and economic recovery, involving local NGOs, community\u00adbased organizations, private sector enterprises, and local authorities (com\u00ad munal and municipal); \n supervise the undertaking of studies to determine reinsertion and reintegration benefits and implementation modalities; \n ensure good coordination and information sharing with implementation partners and other organizations, as well as with other relevant sections of the mission; \n ensure that DDR activities are well integrated and coordinated with the activities of other mission components (particularly communication and public information, mis\u00ad sion analysis, political, military and police components); \n perform a liaison function with other national and international actors in matters related to DDR; \n support development of appropriate legal frameworks on disarmament and weapons control. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62814,14 +62814,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.8: DDR Officer (P4\u2013P3, International)", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "newParagraph": "organizational setting reporting relationship position located peace operation depending organizational structure mission location post incumbent may report directly chief ddr unit senior official charge ddr activity field location n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit ddr officer responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn support chief deputy chief ddr unit operational planning disarmament demobilization reintegration including developing policy programme well implementation target work plan n undertake negotiation armed force group order create condition entrance ddr programme n undertake organize risk threat assessment target group profile political fac tor security factor affecting operation n undertake planning weapon collection activity conjunction military component peacekeeping mission n undertake planning management demobilization phase programme may include camp management well short term transitional support demobilized combatant n provide support development joint programming framework reintegration government partner organization taking advantage opportunity synergy economic recovery community development programme n assist development criterion selection partner local interna tional implementation reinsertion reintegration activity n liaise national international actor activity initiative related reinsertion reintegration n supervise development appropriate mechanism system registration tracking beneficiary reinsertion reintegration well mapping socio economic opportunity development project employment possibili tie etc n coordinate facilitate participation local community planning implementation reintegration assistance using existing capacity local level close synergy economic recovery local development initiative n liaise closely organization partner develop assistance programme vulnerable group eg woman child n facilitate mobilization organization network local partner around goal socio economic reintegration economic recovery involving local ngo community based organization private sector enterprise local authority com munal municipal n supervise undertaking study determine reinsertion reintegration benefit implementation modality n ensure good coordination information sharing implementation partner organization well relevant section mission n ensure ddr activity well integrated coordinated activity mission component particularly communication public information mi sion analysis political military police component n perform liaison function national international actor matter related ddr n support development appropriate legal framework disarmament weapon control nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "SentID": 3489 }, { "ParagraphID": 1143, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62839,7 +62839,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1143, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62850,14 +62850,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.8: DDR Officer (P4\u2013P3, International)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support.", + "Sentence": "\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff provide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff provide guidance support", "SentID": 3491 }, { "ParagraphID": 1143, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62868,14 +62868,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.8: DDR Officer (P4\u2013P3, International)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness.", + "Sentence": "\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff provide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness", "SentID": 3492 }, { "ParagraphID": 1143, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62886,14 +62886,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.8: DDR Officer (P4\u2013P3, International)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives.", + "Sentence": "\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff provide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative", "SentID": 3493 }, { "ParagraphID": 1143, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62904,14 +62904,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.8: DDR Officer (P4\u2013P3, International)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs.", + "Sentence": "\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff provide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need", "SentID": 3494 }, { "ParagraphID": 1143, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62922,14 +62922,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.8: DDR Officer (P4\u2013P3, International)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials.", + "Sentence": "\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff provide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official", "SentID": 3495 }, { "ParagraphID": 1143, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and provide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62940,14 +62940,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.8: DDR Officer (P4\u2013P3, International)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Sentence": "\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff provide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "SentID": 3496 }, { "ParagraphID": 1144, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience with local development, microcredit and participatory approaches essential. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience with local development, microcredit and participatory approaches essential. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62965,7 +62965,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1144, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience with local development, microcredit and participatory approaches essential. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience with local development, microcredit and participatory approaches essential. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62983,7 +62983,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1144, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience with local development, microcredit and participatory approaches essential. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience with local development, microcredit and participatory approaches essential. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -62994,14 +62994,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.8: DDR Officer (P4\u2013P3, International)", "Heading3": "Qualifications", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues.", + "Sentence": "\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues.", "newParagraph": "education advanced university degree social science management economics business administration international development relevant field relevant combination academic qualification experience related area may accepted lieu advanced degree n work experience minimum five year substantial experience working post conflict crisis economic recovery issue experience local development microcredit participatory approach essential n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "ProcessedSent": "n work experience minimum five year substantial experience working post conflict crisis economic recovery issue", "SentID": 3499 }, { "ParagraphID": 1144, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience with local development, microcredit and participatory approaches essential. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience with local development, microcredit and participatory approaches essential. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63019,7 +63019,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1144, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience with local development, microcredit and participatory approaches essential. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience with local development, microcredit and participatory approaches essential. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63030,7 +63030,7 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.8: DDR Officer (P4\u2013P3, International)", "Heading3": "Qualifications", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Sentence": "\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "newParagraph": "education advanced university degree social science management economics business administration international development relevant field relevant combination academic qualification experience related area may accepted lieu advanced degree n work experience minimum five year substantial experience working post conflict crisis economic recovery issue experience local development microcredit participatory approach essential n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "ProcessedSent": "n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "SentID": 3501 @@ -63055,7 +63055,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1146, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Reintegration Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. There\u00ad fore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n support the development of the registration, reinsertion and reintegration component of the disarmament and reintegration programme, including overall framework, imple\u00admentation strategy, and operational modalities, respecting national programme priori\u00ad ties and targets; \\n supervise field office personnel on work related to reinsertion and reintegration; \\n assist in the development of criteria for the selection of partners (local and interna\u00ad tional) for the implementation of reinsertion and reintegration activities; \\n liaise with other national and international actors on activities and initiatives related to reinsertion and reintegration; \\n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of beneficiaries for reinsertion and reintegration, as well as mapping of socio\u00adeconomic opportunities in other development projects, employment possibili\u00ad ties, etc.; \\n coordinate and facilitate the participation of local communities in the planning and implementation of reintegration assistance, using existing capacities at the local level and in close synergy with economic recovery and local development initiatives; \\n liaise closely with organizations and partners to develop assistance programmes for vulnerable groups, e.g., women and children; \\n facilitate the mobilization and organization of networks of local partners around the goals of socio\u00adeconomic reintegration and economic recovery, involving local NGOs, community\u00adbased organizations, private sector enterprises and local authorities (com\u00ad munal and municipal); \\n supervise the undertaking of studies to determine reinsertion and reintegration benefits and implementation modalities. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Reintegration Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. There\u00ad fore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n support the development of the registration, reinsertion and reintegration component of the disarmament and reintegration programme, including overall framework, imple\u00admentation strategy, and operational modalities, respecting national programme priori\u00ad ties and targets; \n supervise field office personnel on work related to reinsertion and reintegration; \n assist in the development of criteria for the selection of partners (local and interna\u00ad tional) for the implementation of reinsertion and reintegration activities; \n liaise with other national and international actors on activities and initiatives related to reinsertion and reintegration; \n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of beneficiaries for reinsertion and reintegration, as well as mapping of socio\u00adeconomic opportunities in other development projects, employment possibili\u00ad ties, etc.; \n coordinate and facilitate the participation of local communities in the planning and implementation of reintegration assistance, using existing capacities at the local level and in close synergy with economic recovery and local development initiatives; \n liaise closely with organizations and partners to develop assistance programmes for vulnerable groups, e.g., women and children; \n facilitate the mobilization and organization of networks of local partners around the goals of socio\u00adeconomic reintegration and economic recovery, involving local NGOs, community\u00adbased organizations, private sector enterprises and local authorities (com\u00ad munal and municipal); \n supervise the undertaking of studies to determine reinsertion and reintegration benefits and implementation modalities. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63073,7 +63073,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1146, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Reintegration Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. There\u00ad fore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n support the development of the registration, reinsertion and reintegration component of the disarmament and reintegration programme, including overall framework, imple\u00admentation strategy, and operational modalities, respecting national programme priori\u00ad ties and targets; \\n supervise field office personnel on work related to reinsertion and reintegration; \\n assist in the development of criteria for the selection of partners (local and interna\u00ad tional) for the implementation of reinsertion and reintegration activities; \\n liaise with other national and international actors on activities and initiatives related to reinsertion and reintegration; \\n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of beneficiaries for reinsertion and reintegration, as well as mapping of socio\u00adeconomic opportunities in other development projects, employment possibili\u00ad ties, etc.; \\n coordinate and facilitate the participation of local communities in the planning and implementation of reintegration assistance, using existing capacities at the local level and in close synergy with economic recovery and local development initiatives; \\n liaise closely with organizations and partners to develop assistance programmes for vulnerable groups, e.g., women and children; \\n facilitate the mobilization and organization of networks of local partners around the goals of socio\u00adeconomic reintegration and economic recovery, involving local NGOs, community\u00adbased organizations, private sector enterprises and local authorities (com\u00ad munal and municipal); \\n supervise the undertaking of studies to determine reinsertion and reintegration benefits and implementation modalities. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Reintegration Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. There\u00ad fore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n support the development of the registration, reinsertion and reintegration component of the disarmament and reintegration programme, including overall framework, imple\u00admentation strategy, and operational modalities, respecting national programme priori\u00ad ties and targets; \n supervise field office personnel on work related to reinsertion and reintegration; \n assist in the development of criteria for the selection of partners (local and interna\u00ad tional) for the implementation of reinsertion and reintegration activities; \n liaise with other national and international actors on activities and initiatives related to reinsertion and reintegration; \n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of beneficiaries for reinsertion and reintegration, as well as mapping of socio\u00adeconomic opportunities in other development projects, employment possibili\u00ad ties, etc.; \n coordinate and facilitate the participation of local communities in the planning and implementation of reintegration assistance, using existing capacities at the local level and in close synergy with economic recovery and local development initiatives; \n liaise closely with organizations and partners to develop assistance programmes for vulnerable groups, e.g., women and children; \n facilitate the mobilization and organization of networks of local partners around the goals of socio\u00adeconomic reintegration and economic recovery, involving local NGOs, community\u00adbased organizations, private sector enterprises and local authorities (com\u00ad munal and municipal); \n supervise the undertaking of studies to determine reinsertion and reintegration benefits and implementation modalities. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63091,7 +63091,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1146, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Reintegration Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. There\u00ad fore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n support the development of the registration, reinsertion and reintegration component of the disarmament and reintegration programme, including overall framework, imple\u00admentation strategy, and operational modalities, respecting national programme priori\u00ad ties and targets; \\n supervise field office personnel on work related to reinsertion and reintegration; \\n assist in the development of criteria for the selection of partners (local and interna\u00ad tional) for the implementation of reinsertion and reintegration activities; \\n liaise with other national and international actors on activities and initiatives related to reinsertion and reintegration; \\n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of beneficiaries for reinsertion and reintegration, as well as mapping of socio\u00adeconomic opportunities in other development projects, employment possibili\u00ad ties, etc.; \\n coordinate and facilitate the participation of local communities in the planning and implementation of reintegration assistance, using existing capacities at the local level and in close synergy with economic recovery and local development initiatives; \\n liaise closely with organizations and partners to develop assistance programmes for vulnerable groups, e.g., women and children; \\n facilitate the mobilization and organization of networks of local partners around the goals of socio\u00adeconomic reintegration and economic recovery, involving local NGOs, community\u00adbased organizations, private sector enterprises and local authorities (com\u00ad munal and municipal); \\n supervise the undertaking of studies to determine reinsertion and reintegration benefits and implementation modalities. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Reintegration Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. There\u00ad fore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n support the development of the registration, reinsertion and reintegration component of the disarmament and reintegration programme, including overall framework, imple\u00admentation strategy, and operational modalities, respecting national programme priori\u00ad ties and targets; \n supervise field office personnel on work related to reinsertion and reintegration; \n assist in the development of criteria for the selection of partners (local and interna\u00ad tional) for the implementation of reinsertion and reintegration activities; \n liaise with other national and international actors on activities and initiatives related to reinsertion and reintegration; \n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of beneficiaries for reinsertion and reintegration, as well as mapping of socio\u00adeconomic opportunities in other development projects, employment possibili\u00ad ties, etc.; \n coordinate and facilitate the participation of local communities in the planning and implementation of reintegration assistance, using existing capacities at the local level and in close synergy with economic recovery and local development initiatives; \n liaise closely with organizations and partners to develop assistance programmes for vulnerable groups, e.g., women and children; \n facilitate the mobilization and organization of networks of local partners around the goals of socio\u00adeconomic reintegration and economic recovery, involving local NGOs, community\u00adbased organizations, private sector enterprises and local authorities (com\u00ad munal and municipal); \n supervise the undertaking of studies to determine reinsertion and reintegration benefits and implementation modalities. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63102,14 +63102,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.9: Reintegration Officer (P4\u2013P3, International)", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Reintegration Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate.", + "Sentence": "\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Reintegration Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate.", "newParagraph": "organizational setting reporting relationship position located peace operation depending organizational structure mission location post incumbent may report directly chief ddr unit senior official charge ddr activity field location n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit reintegration officer responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate fore incumbent may carry function listed nn support development registration reinsertion reintegration component disarmament reintegration programme including overall framework imple mentation strategy operational modality respecting national programme priori tie target n supervise field office personnel work related reinsertion reintegration n assist development criterion selection partner local interna tional implementation reinsertion reintegration activity n liaise national international actor activity initiative related reinsertion reintegration n supervise development appropriate mechanism system registration tracking beneficiary reinsertion reintegration well mapping socio economic opportunity development project employment possibili tie etc n coordinate facilitate participation local community planning implementation reintegration assistance using existing capacity local level close synergy economic recovery local development initiative n liaise closely organization partner develop assistance programme vulnerable group eg woman child n facilitate mobilization organization network local partner around goal socio economic reintegration economic recovery involving local ngo community based organization private sector enterprise local authority com munal municipal n supervise undertaking study determine reinsertion reintegration benefit implementation modality nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit reintegration officer responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate", "SentID": 3505 }, { "ParagraphID": 1146, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Reintegration Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. There\u00ad fore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n support the development of the registration, reinsertion and reintegration component of the disarmament and reintegration programme, including overall framework, imple\u00admentation strategy, and operational modalities, respecting national programme priori\u00ad ties and targets; \\n supervise field office personnel on work related to reinsertion and reintegration; \\n assist in the development of criteria for the selection of partners (local and interna\u00ad tional) for the implementation of reinsertion and reintegration activities; \\n liaise with other national and international actors on activities and initiatives related to reinsertion and reintegration; \\n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of beneficiaries for reinsertion and reintegration, as well as mapping of socio\u00adeconomic opportunities in other development projects, employment possibili\u00ad ties, etc.; \\n coordinate and facilitate the participation of local communities in the planning and implementation of reintegration assistance, using existing capacities at the local level and in close synergy with economic recovery and local development initiatives; \\n liaise closely with organizations and partners to develop assistance programmes for vulnerable groups, e.g., women and children; \\n facilitate the mobilization and organization of networks of local partners around the goals of socio\u00adeconomic reintegration and economic recovery, involving local NGOs, community\u00adbased organizations, private sector enterprises and local authorities (com\u00ad munal and municipal); \\n supervise the undertaking of studies to determine reinsertion and reintegration benefits and implementation modalities. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Reintegration Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. There\u00ad fore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n support the development of the registration, reinsertion and reintegration component of the disarmament and reintegration programme, including overall framework, imple\u00admentation strategy, and operational modalities, respecting national programme priori\u00ad ties and targets; \n supervise field office personnel on work related to reinsertion and reintegration; \n assist in the development of criteria for the selection of partners (local and interna\u00ad tional) for the implementation of reinsertion and reintegration activities; \n liaise with other national and international actors on activities and initiatives related to reinsertion and reintegration; \n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of beneficiaries for reinsertion and reintegration, as well as mapping of socio\u00adeconomic opportunities in other development projects, employment possibili\u00ad ties, etc.; \n coordinate and facilitate the participation of local communities in the planning and implementation of reintegration assistance, using existing capacities at the local level and in close synergy with economic recovery and local development initiatives; \n liaise closely with organizations and partners to develop assistance programmes for vulnerable groups, e.g., women and children; \n facilitate the mobilization and organization of networks of local partners around the goals of socio\u00adeconomic reintegration and economic recovery, involving local NGOs, community\u00adbased organizations, private sector enterprises and local authorities (com\u00ad munal and municipal); \n supervise the undertaking of studies to determine reinsertion and reintegration benefits and implementation modalities. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63127,7 +63127,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1146, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Reintegration Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. There\u00ad fore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n support the development of the registration, reinsertion and reintegration component of the disarmament and reintegration programme, including overall framework, imple\u00admentation strategy, and operational modalities, respecting national programme priori\u00ad ties and targets; \\n supervise field office personnel on work related to reinsertion and reintegration; \\n assist in the development of criteria for the selection of partners (local and interna\u00ad tional) for the implementation of reinsertion and reintegration activities; \\n liaise with other national and international actors on activities and initiatives related to reinsertion and reintegration; \\n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of beneficiaries for reinsertion and reintegration, as well as mapping of socio\u00adeconomic opportunities in other development projects, employment possibili\u00ad ties, etc.; \\n coordinate and facilitate the participation of local communities in the planning and implementation of reintegration assistance, using existing capacities at the local level and in close synergy with economic recovery and local development initiatives; \\n liaise closely with organizations and partners to develop assistance programmes for vulnerable groups, e.g., women and children; \\n facilitate the mobilization and organization of networks of local partners around the goals of socio\u00adeconomic reintegration and economic recovery, involving local NGOs, community\u00adbased organizations, private sector enterprises and local authorities (com\u00ad munal and municipal); \\n supervise the undertaking of studies to determine reinsertion and reintegration benefits and implementation modalities. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Reintegration Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. There\u00ad fore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n support the development of the registration, reinsertion and reintegration component of the disarmament and reintegration programme, including overall framework, imple\u00admentation strategy, and operational modalities, respecting national programme priori\u00ad ties and targets; \n supervise field office personnel on work related to reinsertion and reintegration; \n assist in the development of criteria for the selection of partners (local and interna\u00ad tional) for the implementation of reinsertion and reintegration activities; \n liaise with other national and international actors on activities and initiatives related to reinsertion and reintegration; \n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of beneficiaries for reinsertion and reintegration, as well as mapping of socio\u00adeconomic opportunities in other development projects, employment possibili\u00ad ties, etc.; \n coordinate and facilitate the participation of local communities in the planning and implementation of reintegration assistance, using existing capacities at the local level and in close synergy with economic recovery and local development initiatives; \n liaise closely with organizations and partners to develop assistance programmes for vulnerable groups, e.g., women and children; \n facilitate the mobilization and organization of networks of local partners around the goals of socio\u00adeconomic reintegration and economic recovery, involving local NGOs, community\u00adbased organizations, private sector enterprises and local authorities (com\u00ad munal and municipal); \n supervise the undertaking of studies to determine reinsertion and reintegration benefits and implementation modalities. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63138,14 +63138,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.9: Reintegration Officer (P4\u2013P3, International)", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n support the development of the registration, reinsertion and reintegration component of the disarmament and reintegration programme, including overall framework, imple\u00admentation strategy, and operational modalities, respecting national programme priori\u00ad ties and targets; \\n supervise field office personnel on work related to reinsertion and reintegration; \\n assist in the development of criteria for the selection of partners (local and interna\u00ad tional) for the implementation of reinsertion and reintegration activities; \\n liaise with other national and international actors on activities and initiatives related to reinsertion and reintegration; \\n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of beneficiaries for reinsertion and reintegration, as well as mapping of socio\u00adeconomic opportunities in other development projects, employment possibili\u00ad ties, etc.", + "Sentence": "\n\n support the development of the registration, reinsertion and reintegration component of the disarmament and reintegration programme, including overall framework, imple\u00admentation strategy, and operational modalities, respecting national programme priori\u00ad ties and targets; \n supervise field office personnel on work related to reinsertion and reintegration; \n assist in the development of criteria for the selection of partners (local and interna\u00ad tional) for the implementation of reinsertion and reintegration activities; \n liaise with other national and international actors on activities and initiatives related to reinsertion and reintegration; \n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of beneficiaries for reinsertion and reintegration, as well as mapping of socio\u00adeconomic opportunities in other development projects, employment possibili\u00ad ties, etc.", "newParagraph": "organizational setting reporting relationship position located peace operation depending organizational structure mission location post incumbent may report directly chief ddr unit senior official charge ddr activity field location n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit reintegration officer responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate fore incumbent may carry function listed nn support development registration reinsertion reintegration component disarmament reintegration programme including overall framework imple mentation strategy operational modality respecting national programme priori tie target n supervise field office personnel work related reinsertion reintegration n assist development criterion selection partner local interna tional implementation reinsertion reintegration activity n liaise national international actor activity initiative related reinsertion reintegration n supervise development appropriate mechanism system registration tracking beneficiary reinsertion reintegration well mapping socio economic opportunity development project employment possibili tie etc n coordinate facilitate participation local community planning implementation reintegration assistance using existing capacity local level close synergy economic recovery local development initiative n liaise closely organization partner develop assistance programme vulnerable group eg woman child n facilitate mobilization organization network local partner around goal socio economic reintegration economic recovery involving local ngo community based organization private sector enterprise local authority com munal municipal n supervise undertaking study determine reinsertion reintegration benefit implementation modality nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "nn support development registration reinsertion reintegration component disarmament reintegration programme including overall framework imple mentation strategy operational modality respecting national programme priori tie target n supervise field office personnel work related reinsertion reintegration n assist development criterion selection partner local interna tional implementation reinsertion reintegration activity n liaise national international actor activity initiative related reinsertion reintegration n supervise development appropriate mechanism system registration tracking beneficiary reinsertion reintegration well mapping socio economic opportunity development project employment possibili tie etc", "SentID": 3507 }, { "ParagraphID": 1146, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Reintegration Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. There\u00ad fore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n support the development of the registration, reinsertion and reintegration component of the disarmament and reintegration programme, including overall framework, imple\u00admentation strategy, and operational modalities, respecting national programme priori\u00ad ties and targets; \\n supervise field office personnel on work related to reinsertion and reintegration; \\n assist in the development of criteria for the selection of partners (local and interna\u00ad tional) for the implementation of reinsertion and reintegration activities; \\n liaise with other national and international actors on activities and initiatives related to reinsertion and reintegration; \\n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of beneficiaries for reinsertion and reintegration, as well as mapping of socio\u00adeconomic opportunities in other development projects, employment possibili\u00ad ties, etc.; \\n coordinate and facilitate the participation of local communities in the planning and implementation of reintegration assistance, using existing capacities at the local level and in close synergy with economic recovery and local development initiatives; \\n liaise closely with organizations and partners to develop assistance programmes for vulnerable groups, e.g., women and children; \\n facilitate the mobilization and organization of networks of local partners around the goals of socio\u00adeconomic reintegration and economic recovery, involving local NGOs, community\u00adbased organizations, private sector enterprises and local authorities (com\u00ad munal and municipal); \\n supervise the undertaking of studies to determine reinsertion and reintegration benefits and implementation modalities. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Reintegration Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. There\u00ad fore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n support the development of the registration, reinsertion and reintegration component of the disarmament and reintegration programme, including overall framework, imple\u00admentation strategy, and operational modalities, respecting national programme priori\u00ad ties and targets; \n supervise field office personnel on work related to reinsertion and reintegration; \n assist in the development of criteria for the selection of partners (local and interna\u00ad tional) for the implementation of reinsertion and reintegration activities; \n liaise with other national and international actors on activities and initiatives related to reinsertion and reintegration; \n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of beneficiaries for reinsertion and reintegration, as well as mapping of socio\u00adeconomic opportunities in other development projects, employment possibili\u00ad ties, etc.; \n coordinate and facilitate the participation of local communities in the planning and implementation of reintegration assistance, using existing capacities at the local level and in close synergy with economic recovery and local development initiatives; \n liaise closely with organizations and partners to develop assistance programmes for vulnerable groups, e.g., women and children; \n facilitate the mobilization and organization of networks of local partners around the goals of socio\u00adeconomic reintegration and economic recovery, involving local NGOs, community\u00adbased organizations, private sector enterprises and local authorities (com\u00ad munal and municipal); \n supervise the undertaking of studies to determine reinsertion and reintegration benefits and implementation modalities. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63156,14 +63156,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.9: Reintegration Officer (P4\u2013P3, International)", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "; \\n coordinate and facilitate the participation of local communities in the planning and implementation of reintegration assistance, using existing capacities at the local level and in close synergy with economic recovery and local development initiatives; \\n liaise closely with organizations and partners to develop assistance programmes for vulnerable groups, e.g., women and children; \\n facilitate the mobilization and organization of networks of local partners around the goals of socio\u00adeconomic reintegration and economic recovery, involving local NGOs, community\u00adbased organizations, private sector enterprises and local authorities (com\u00ad munal and municipal); \\n supervise the undertaking of studies to determine reinsertion and reintegration benefits and implementation modalities.", + "Sentence": "; \n coordinate and facilitate the participation of local communities in the planning and implementation of reintegration assistance, using existing capacities at the local level and in close synergy with economic recovery and local development initiatives; \n liaise closely with organizations and partners to develop assistance programmes for vulnerable groups, e.g., women and children; \n facilitate the mobilization and organization of networks of local partners around the goals of socio\u00adeconomic reintegration and economic recovery, involving local NGOs, community\u00adbased organizations, private sector enterprises and local authorities (com\u00ad munal and municipal); \n supervise the undertaking of studies to determine reinsertion and reintegration benefits and implementation modalities.", "newParagraph": "organizational setting reporting relationship position located peace operation depending organizational structure mission location post incumbent may report directly chief ddr unit senior official charge ddr activity field location n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit reintegration officer responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate fore incumbent may carry function listed nn support development registration reinsertion reintegration component disarmament reintegration programme including overall framework imple mentation strategy operational modality respecting national programme priori tie target n supervise field office personnel work related reinsertion reintegration n assist development criterion selection partner local interna tional implementation reinsertion reintegration activity n liaise national international actor activity initiative related reinsertion reintegration n supervise development appropriate mechanism system registration tracking beneficiary reinsertion reintegration well mapping socio economic opportunity development project employment possibili tie etc n coordinate facilitate participation local community planning implementation reintegration assistance using existing capacity local level close synergy economic recovery local development initiative n liaise closely organization partner develop assistance programme vulnerable group eg woman child n facilitate mobilization organization network local partner around goal socio economic reintegration economic recovery involving local ngo community based organization private sector enterprise local authority com munal municipal n supervise undertaking study determine reinsertion reintegration benefit implementation modality nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": " n coordinate facilitate participation local community planning implementation reintegration assistance using existing capacity local level close synergy economic recovery local development initiative n liaise closely organization partner develop assistance programme vulnerable group eg woman child n facilitate mobilization organization network local partner around goal socio economic reintegration economic recovery involving local ngo community based organization private sector enterprise local authority com munal municipal n supervise undertaking study determine reinsertion reintegration benefit implementation modality", "SentID": 3508 }, { "ParagraphID": 1146, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Reintegration Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. There\u00ad fore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n support the development of the registration, reinsertion and reintegration component of the disarmament and reintegration programme, including overall framework, imple\u00admentation strategy, and operational modalities, respecting national programme priori\u00ad ties and targets; \\n supervise field office personnel on work related to reinsertion and reintegration; \\n assist in the development of criteria for the selection of partners (local and interna\u00ad tional) for the implementation of reinsertion and reintegration activities; \\n liaise with other national and international actors on activities and initiatives related to reinsertion and reintegration; \\n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of beneficiaries for reinsertion and reintegration, as well as mapping of socio\u00adeconomic opportunities in other development projects, employment possibili\u00ad ties, etc.; \\n coordinate and facilitate the participation of local communities in the planning and implementation of reintegration assistance, using existing capacities at the local level and in close synergy with economic recovery and local development initiatives; \\n liaise closely with organizations and partners to develop assistance programmes for vulnerable groups, e.g., women and children; \\n facilitate the mobilization and organization of networks of local partners around the goals of socio\u00adeconomic reintegration and economic recovery, involving local NGOs, community\u00adbased organizations, private sector enterprises and local authorities (com\u00ad munal and municipal); \\n supervise the undertaking of studies to determine reinsertion and reintegration benefits and implementation modalities. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Reintegration Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. There\u00ad fore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n support the development of the registration, reinsertion and reintegration component of the disarmament and reintegration programme, including overall framework, imple\u00admentation strategy, and operational modalities, respecting national programme priori\u00ad ties and targets; \n supervise field office personnel on work related to reinsertion and reintegration; \n assist in the development of criteria for the selection of partners (local and interna\u00ad tional) for the implementation of reinsertion and reintegration activities; \n liaise with other national and international actors on activities and initiatives related to reinsertion and reintegration; \n supervise the development of appropriate mechanisms and systems for the registration and tracking of beneficiaries for reinsertion and reintegration, as well as mapping of socio\u00adeconomic opportunities in other development projects, employment possibili\u00ad ties, etc.; \n coordinate and facilitate the participation of local communities in the planning and implementation of reintegration assistance, using existing capacities at the local level and in close synergy with economic recovery and local development initiatives; \n liaise closely with organizations and partners to develop assistance programmes for vulnerable groups, e.g., women and children; \n facilitate the mobilization and organization of networks of local partners around the goals of socio\u00adeconomic reintegration and economic recovery, involving local NGOs, community\u00adbased organizations, private sector enterprises and local authorities (com\u00ad munal and municipal); \n supervise the undertaking of studies to determine reinsertion and reintegration benefits and implementation modalities. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63174,14 +63174,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.9: Reintegration Officer (P4\u2013P3, International)", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "newParagraph": "organizational setting reporting relationship position located peace operation depending organizational structure mission location post incumbent may report directly chief ddr unit senior official charge ddr activity field location n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit reintegration officer responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate fore incumbent may carry function listed nn support development registration reinsertion reintegration component disarmament reintegration programme including overall framework imple mentation strategy operational modality respecting national programme priori tie target n supervise field office personnel work related reinsertion reintegration n assist development criterion selection partner local interna tional implementation reinsertion reintegration activity n liaise national international actor activity initiative related reinsertion reintegration n supervise development appropriate mechanism system registration tracking beneficiary reinsertion reintegration well mapping socio economic opportunity development project employment possibili tie etc n coordinate facilitate participation local community planning implementation reintegration assistance using existing capacity local level close synergy economic recovery local development initiative n liaise closely organization partner develop assistance programme vulnerable group eg woman child n facilitate mobilization organization network local partner around goal socio economic reintegration economic recovery involving local ngo community based organization private sector enterprise local authority com munal municipal n supervise undertaking study determine reinsertion reintegration benefit implementation modality nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "SentID": 3509 }, { "ParagraphID": 1147, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs; \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs; \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63199,7 +63199,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1147, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs; \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs; \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63210,14 +63210,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.9: Reintegration Officer (P4\u2013P3, International)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support.", + "Sentence": "\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support", "SentID": 3511 }, { "ParagraphID": 1147, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs; \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs; \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63228,14 +63228,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.9: Reintegration Officer (P4\u2013P3, International)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness.", + "Sentence": "\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness", "SentID": 3512 }, { "ParagraphID": 1147, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs; \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs; \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63246,14 +63246,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.9: Reintegration Officer (P4\u2013P3, International)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives.", + "Sentence": "\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative", "SentID": 3513 }, { "ParagraphID": 1147, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs; \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs; \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63264,14 +63264,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.9: Reintegration Officer (P4\u2013P3, International)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs; \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials.", + "Sentence": "\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs; \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official", "SentID": 3514 }, { "ParagraphID": 1147, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs; \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs; \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63282,14 +63282,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.9: Reintegration Officer (P4\u2013P3, International)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Sentence": "\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "SentID": 3515 }, { "ParagraphID": 1148, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience with local development, microcredit and participatory approaches essential. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience with local development, microcredit and participatory approaches essential. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63307,7 +63307,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1148, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience with local development, microcredit and participatory approaches essential. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience with local development, microcredit and participatory approaches essential. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63325,7 +63325,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1148, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience with local development, microcredit and participatory approaches essential. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience with local development, microcredit and participatory approaches essential. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63336,14 +63336,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.9: Reintegration Officer (P4\u2013P3, International)", "Heading3": "Qualifications", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues.", + "Sentence": "\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues.", "newParagraph": "education advanced university degree social science management economics business administration international development relevant field relevant combination academic qualification experience related area may accepted lieu advanced degree n work experience minimum five year substantial experience working post conflict crisis economic recovery issue experience local development microcredit participatory approach essential n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "ProcessedSent": "n work experience minimum five year substantial experience working post conflict crisis economic recovery issue", "SentID": 3518 }, { "ParagraphID": 1148, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience with local development, microcredit and participatory approaches essential. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience with local development, microcredit and participatory approaches essential. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63361,7 +63361,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1148, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience with local development, microcredit and participatory approaches essential. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. Experience with local development, microcredit and participatory approaches essential. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63372,7 +63372,7 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.9: Reintegration Officer (P4\u2013P3, International)", "Heading3": "Qualifications", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Sentence": "\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "newParagraph": "education advanced university degree social science management economics business administration international development relevant field relevant combination academic qualification experience related area may accepted lieu advanced degree n work experience minimum five year substantial experience working post conflict crisis economic recovery issue experience local development microcredit participatory approach essential n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "ProcessedSent": "n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "SentID": 3520 @@ -63397,7 +63397,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1150, - "Paragraph": "Under the overall supervision of the Chief of DDR Unit and working closely with the DDR Officer, the Field Coordination Officer carries out the work, information feedback and coordination of field rehabilitation and reintegration activities. The Field Coordination Officer will improve field supervision, sensitization, monitoring and evaluation mechanisms. He\/she will also assist in strengthening the working relationships of DDR staff with other peacekeeping mission substantive sections in the field. He\/she will also endeavour to strengthen, coordination and collaboration with government offices, the national commis\u00ad sion on DDR (NCDDR), international NGOs, NGOs (implementing partners) and other UN agencies working on reintegration in order to unify reintegration activities. The Field Coordination Officer will liaise closely with the DDR Officer\/Reintegration Officer and undertake the following duties: \\n assist and advise DDR Unit in areas within his\/her remit; \\n provide direction and support to field staff and activities; \\n carry out monitoring, risk assessment and reporting in relation to the environment and practices that bear on the security of staff in the field (physical security, accommo\u00ad dation, programme fiscal and procurement practices, transport and communications); \\n support the efficient implementation of all DDR coordination projects; \\n develop and sustain optimal information feedback, in both directions, between the field and Headquarters; \\n support the DDR Unit in the collection of programme performance information, pro\u00ad gress and impact assessment; \\n collect the quantitative and qualitative information on programme implementation; \\n carry out follow\u00adup monitoring visits on activities of implementing partners and regional offices; \\n liaise with ex\u00adcombatants, beneficiaries, implementing partners and referral officer for proper sensitization and reinforcement of the programme; \\n create efficient early warning alert system and rapid response mechanisms for \u2018hot spot\u2019 development; \\n ensure DDR coordination programs complement each other and are implemented efficiently; \\n support liaison with the NCDDR and other agencies in relation to the reintegration of ex\u00adcombatants, CAAFG, WAAFG and war\u00adaffected people in the field; \\n provide guidance and on\u00adthe\u00adground support to reintegration officers; \\n liaise with Military Observers, Reintegration Unit and UN Police in accordance with the terms of reference; \\n liaise and coordinate with civil affairs section in matters of mutual interest; \\n carry out any other duties as directed by the DDR Unit.", + "Paragraph": "Under the overall supervision of the Chief of DDR Unit and working closely with the DDR Officer, the Field Coordination Officer carries out the work, information feedback and coordination of field rehabilitation and reintegration activities. The Field Coordination Officer will improve field supervision, sensitization, monitoring and evaluation mechanisms. He\/she will also assist in strengthening the working relationships of DDR staff with other peacekeeping mission substantive sections in the field. He\/she will also endeavour to strengthen, coordination and collaboration with government offices, the national commis\u00ad sion on DDR (NCDDR), international NGOs, NGOs (implementing partners) and other UN agencies working on reintegration in order to unify reintegration activities. The Field Coordination Officer will liaise closely with the DDR Officer\/Reintegration Officer and undertake the following duties: \n assist and advise DDR Unit in areas within his\/her remit; \n provide direction and support to field staff and activities; \n carry out monitoring, risk assessment and reporting in relation to the environment and practices that bear on the security of staff in the field (physical security, accommo\u00ad dation, programme fiscal and procurement practices, transport and communications); \n support the efficient implementation of all DDR coordination projects; \n develop and sustain optimal information feedback, in both directions, between the field and Headquarters; \n support the DDR Unit in the collection of programme performance information, pro\u00ad gress and impact assessment; \n collect the quantitative and qualitative information on programme implementation; \n carry out follow\u00adup monitoring visits on activities of implementing partners and regional offices; \n liaise with ex\u00adcombatants, beneficiaries, implementing partners and referral officer for proper sensitization and reinforcement of the programme; \n create efficient early warning alert system and rapid response mechanisms for \u2018hot spot\u2019 development; \n ensure DDR coordination programs complement each other and are implemented efficiently; \n support liaison with the NCDDR and other agencies in relation to the reintegration of ex\u00adcombatants, CAAFG, WAAFG and war\u00adaffected people in the field; \n provide guidance and on\u00adthe\u00adground support to reintegration officers; \n liaise with Military Observers, Reintegration Unit and UN Police in accordance with the terms of reference; \n liaise and coordinate with civil affairs section in matters of mutual interest; \n carry out any other duties as directed by the DDR Unit.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63415,7 +63415,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1150, - "Paragraph": "Under the overall supervision of the Chief of DDR Unit and working closely with the DDR Officer, the Field Coordination Officer carries out the work, information feedback and coordination of field rehabilitation and reintegration activities. The Field Coordination Officer will improve field supervision, sensitization, monitoring and evaluation mechanisms. He\/she will also assist in strengthening the working relationships of DDR staff with other peacekeeping mission substantive sections in the field. He\/she will also endeavour to strengthen, coordination and collaboration with government offices, the national commis\u00ad sion on DDR (NCDDR), international NGOs, NGOs (implementing partners) and other UN agencies working on reintegration in order to unify reintegration activities. The Field Coordination Officer will liaise closely with the DDR Officer\/Reintegration Officer and undertake the following duties: \\n assist and advise DDR Unit in areas within his\/her remit; \\n provide direction and support to field staff and activities; \\n carry out monitoring, risk assessment and reporting in relation to the environment and practices that bear on the security of staff in the field (physical security, accommo\u00ad dation, programme fiscal and procurement practices, transport and communications); \\n support the efficient implementation of all DDR coordination projects; \\n develop and sustain optimal information feedback, in both directions, between the field and Headquarters; \\n support the DDR Unit in the collection of programme performance information, pro\u00ad gress and impact assessment; \\n collect the quantitative and qualitative information on programme implementation; \\n carry out follow\u00adup monitoring visits on activities of implementing partners and regional offices; \\n liaise with ex\u00adcombatants, beneficiaries, implementing partners and referral officer for proper sensitization and reinforcement of the programme; \\n create efficient early warning alert system and rapid response mechanisms for \u2018hot spot\u2019 development; \\n ensure DDR coordination programs complement each other and are implemented efficiently; \\n support liaison with the NCDDR and other agencies in relation to the reintegration of ex\u00adcombatants, CAAFG, WAAFG and war\u00adaffected people in the field; \\n provide guidance and on\u00adthe\u00adground support to reintegration officers; \\n liaise with Military Observers, Reintegration Unit and UN Police in accordance with the terms of reference; \\n liaise and coordinate with civil affairs section in matters of mutual interest; \\n carry out any other duties as directed by the DDR Unit.", + "Paragraph": "Under the overall supervision of the Chief of DDR Unit and working closely with the DDR Officer, the Field Coordination Officer carries out the work, information feedback and coordination of field rehabilitation and reintegration activities. The Field Coordination Officer will improve field supervision, sensitization, monitoring and evaluation mechanisms. He\/she will also assist in strengthening the working relationships of DDR staff with other peacekeeping mission substantive sections in the field. He\/she will also endeavour to strengthen, coordination and collaboration with government offices, the national commis\u00ad sion on DDR (NCDDR), international NGOs, NGOs (implementing partners) and other UN agencies working on reintegration in order to unify reintegration activities. The Field Coordination Officer will liaise closely with the DDR Officer\/Reintegration Officer and undertake the following duties: \n assist and advise DDR Unit in areas within his\/her remit; \n provide direction and support to field staff and activities; \n carry out monitoring, risk assessment and reporting in relation to the environment and practices that bear on the security of staff in the field (physical security, accommo\u00ad dation, programme fiscal and procurement practices, transport and communications); \n support the efficient implementation of all DDR coordination projects; \n develop and sustain optimal information feedback, in both directions, between the field and Headquarters; \n support the DDR Unit in the collection of programme performance information, pro\u00ad gress and impact assessment; \n collect the quantitative and qualitative information on programme implementation; \n carry out follow\u00adup monitoring visits on activities of implementing partners and regional offices; \n liaise with ex\u00adcombatants, beneficiaries, implementing partners and referral officer for proper sensitization and reinforcement of the programme; \n create efficient early warning alert system and rapid response mechanisms for \u2018hot spot\u2019 development; \n ensure DDR coordination programs complement each other and are implemented efficiently; \n support liaison with the NCDDR and other agencies in relation to the reintegration of ex\u00adcombatants, CAAFG, WAAFG and war\u00adaffected people in the field; \n provide guidance and on\u00adthe\u00adground support to reintegration officers; \n liaise with Military Observers, Reintegration Unit and UN Police in accordance with the terms of reference; \n liaise and coordinate with civil affairs section in matters of mutual interest; \n carry out any other duties as directed by the DDR Unit.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63433,7 +63433,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1150, - "Paragraph": "Under the overall supervision of the Chief of DDR Unit and working closely with the DDR Officer, the Field Coordination Officer carries out the work, information feedback and coordination of field rehabilitation and reintegration activities. The Field Coordination Officer will improve field supervision, sensitization, monitoring and evaluation mechanisms. He\/she will also assist in strengthening the working relationships of DDR staff with other peacekeeping mission substantive sections in the field. He\/she will also endeavour to strengthen, coordination and collaboration with government offices, the national commis\u00ad sion on DDR (NCDDR), international NGOs, NGOs (implementing partners) and other UN agencies working on reintegration in order to unify reintegration activities. The Field Coordination Officer will liaise closely with the DDR Officer\/Reintegration Officer and undertake the following duties: \\n assist and advise DDR Unit in areas within his\/her remit; \\n provide direction and support to field staff and activities; \\n carry out monitoring, risk assessment and reporting in relation to the environment and practices that bear on the security of staff in the field (physical security, accommo\u00ad dation, programme fiscal and procurement practices, transport and communications); \\n support the efficient implementation of all DDR coordination projects; \\n develop and sustain optimal information feedback, in both directions, between the field and Headquarters; \\n support the DDR Unit in the collection of programme performance information, pro\u00ad gress and impact assessment; \\n collect the quantitative and qualitative information on programme implementation; \\n carry out follow\u00adup monitoring visits on activities of implementing partners and regional offices; \\n liaise with ex\u00adcombatants, beneficiaries, implementing partners and referral officer for proper sensitization and reinforcement of the programme; \\n create efficient early warning alert system and rapid response mechanisms for \u2018hot spot\u2019 development; \\n ensure DDR coordination programs complement each other and are implemented efficiently; \\n support liaison with the NCDDR and other agencies in relation to the reintegration of ex\u00adcombatants, CAAFG, WAAFG and war\u00adaffected people in the field; \\n provide guidance and on\u00adthe\u00adground support to reintegration officers; \\n liaise with Military Observers, Reintegration Unit and UN Police in accordance with the terms of reference; \\n liaise and coordinate with civil affairs section in matters of mutual interest; \\n carry out any other duties as directed by the DDR Unit.", + "Paragraph": "Under the overall supervision of the Chief of DDR Unit and working closely with the DDR Officer, the Field Coordination Officer carries out the work, information feedback and coordination of field rehabilitation and reintegration activities. The Field Coordination Officer will improve field supervision, sensitization, monitoring and evaluation mechanisms. He\/she will also assist in strengthening the working relationships of DDR staff with other peacekeeping mission substantive sections in the field. He\/she will also endeavour to strengthen, coordination and collaboration with government offices, the national commis\u00ad sion on DDR (NCDDR), international NGOs, NGOs (implementing partners) and other UN agencies working on reintegration in order to unify reintegration activities. The Field Coordination Officer will liaise closely with the DDR Officer\/Reintegration Officer and undertake the following duties: \n assist and advise DDR Unit in areas within his\/her remit; \n provide direction and support to field staff and activities; \n carry out monitoring, risk assessment and reporting in relation to the environment and practices that bear on the security of staff in the field (physical security, accommo\u00ad dation, programme fiscal and procurement practices, transport and communications); \n support the efficient implementation of all DDR coordination projects; \n develop and sustain optimal information feedback, in both directions, between the field and Headquarters; \n support the DDR Unit in the collection of programme performance information, pro\u00ad gress and impact assessment; \n collect the quantitative and qualitative information on programme implementation; \n carry out follow\u00adup monitoring visits on activities of implementing partners and regional offices; \n liaise with ex\u00adcombatants, beneficiaries, implementing partners and referral officer for proper sensitization and reinforcement of the programme; \n create efficient early warning alert system and rapid response mechanisms for \u2018hot spot\u2019 development; \n ensure DDR coordination programs complement each other and are implemented efficiently; \n support liaison with the NCDDR and other agencies in relation to the reintegration of ex\u00adcombatants, CAAFG, WAAFG and war\u00adaffected people in the field; \n provide guidance and on\u00adthe\u00adground support to reintegration officers; \n liaise with Military Observers, Reintegration Unit and UN Police in accordance with the terms of reference; \n liaise and coordinate with civil affairs section in matters of mutual interest; \n carry out any other duties as directed by the DDR Unit.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63451,7 +63451,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1150, - "Paragraph": "Under the overall supervision of the Chief of DDR Unit and working closely with the DDR Officer, the Field Coordination Officer carries out the work, information feedback and coordination of field rehabilitation and reintegration activities. The Field Coordination Officer will improve field supervision, sensitization, monitoring and evaluation mechanisms. He\/she will also assist in strengthening the working relationships of DDR staff with other peacekeeping mission substantive sections in the field. He\/she will also endeavour to strengthen, coordination and collaboration with government offices, the national commis\u00ad sion on DDR (NCDDR), international NGOs, NGOs (implementing partners) and other UN agencies working on reintegration in order to unify reintegration activities. The Field Coordination Officer will liaise closely with the DDR Officer\/Reintegration Officer and undertake the following duties: \\n assist and advise DDR Unit in areas within his\/her remit; \\n provide direction and support to field staff and activities; \\n carry out monitoring, risk assessment and reporting in relation to the environment and practices that bear on the security of staff in the field (physical security, accommo\u00ad dation, programme fiscal and procurement practices, transport and communications); \\n support the efficient implementation of all DDR coordination projects; \\n develop and sustain optimal information feedback, in both directions, between the field and Headquarters; \\n support the DDR Unit in the collection of programme performance information, pro\u00ad gress and impact assessment; \\n collect the quantitative and qualitative information on programme implementation; \\n carry out follow\u00adup monitoring visits on activities of implementing partners and regional offices; \\n liaise with ex\u00adcombatants, beneficiaries, implementing partners and referral officer for proper sensitization and reinforcement of the programme; \\n create efficient early warning alert system and rapid response mechanisms for \u2018hot spot\u2019 development; \\n ensure DDR coordination programs complement each other and are implemented efficiently; \\n support liaison with the NCDDR and other agencies in relation to the reintegration of ex\u00adcombatants, CAAFG, WAAFG and war\u00adaffected people in the field; \\n provide guidance and on\u00adthe\u00adground support to reintegration officers; \\n liaise with Military Observers, Reintegration Unit and UN Police in accordance with the terms of reference; \\n liaise and coordinate with civil affairs section in matters of mutual interest; \\n carry out any other duties as directed by the DDR Unit.", + "Paragraph": "Under the overall supervision of the Chief of DDR Unit and working closely with the DDR Officer, the Field Coordination Officer carries out the work, information feedback and coordination of field rehabilitation and reintegration activities. The Field Coordination Officer will improve field supervision, sensitization, monitoring and evaluation mechanisms. He\/she will also assist in strengthening the working relationships of DDR staff with other peacekeeping mission substantive sections in the field. He\/she will also endeavour to strengthen, coordination and collaboration with government offices, the national commis\u00ad sion on DDR (NCDDR), international NGOs, NGOs (implementing partners) and other UN agencies working on reintegration in order to unify reintegration activities. The Field Coordination Officer will liaise closely with the DDR Officer\/Reintegration Officer and undertake the following duties: \n assist and advise DDR Unit in areas within his\/her remit; \n provide direction and support to field staff and activities; \n carry out monitoring, risk assessment and reporting in relation to the environment and practices that bear on the security of staff in the field (physical security, accommo\u00ad dation, programme fiscal and procurement practices, transport and communications); \n support the efficient implementation of all DDR coordination projects; \n develop and sustain optimal information feedback, in both directions, between the field and Headquarters; \n support the DDR Unit in the collection of programme performance information, pro\u00ad gress and impact assessment; \n collect the quantitative and qualitative information on programme implementation; \n carry out follow\u00adup monitoring visits on activities of implementing partners and regional offices; \n liaise with ex\u00adcombatants, beneficiaries, implementing partners and referral officer for proper sensitization and reinforcement of the programme; \n create efficient early warning alert system and rapid response mechanisms for \u2018hot spot\u2019 development; \n ensure DDR coordination programs complement each other and are implemented efficiently; \n support liaison with the NCDDR and other agencies in relation to the reintegration of ex\u00adcombatants, CAAFG, WAAFG and war\u00adaffected people in the field; \n provide guidance and on\u00adthe\u00adground support to reintegration officers; \n liaise with Military Observers, Reintegration Unit and UN Police in accordance with the terms of reference; \n liaise and coordinate with civil affairs section in matters of mutual interest; \n carry out any other duties as directed by the DDR Unit.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63469,7 +63469,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1150, - "Paragraph": "Under the overall supervision of the Chief of DDR Unit and working closely with the DDR Officer, the Field Coordination Officer carries out the work, information feedback and coordination of field rehabilitation and reintegration activities. The Field Coordination Officer will improve field supervision, sensitization, monitoring and evaluation mechanisms. He\/she will also assist in strengthening the working relationships of DDR staff with other peacekeeping mission substantive sections in the field. He\/she will also endeavour to strengthen, coordination and collaboration with government offices, the national commis\u00ad sion on DDR (NCDDR), international NGOs, NGOs (implementing partners) and other UN agencies working on reintegration in order to unify reintegration activities. The Field Coordination Officer will liaise closely with the DDR Officer\/Reintegration Officer and undertake the following duties: \\n assist and advise DDR Unit in areas within his\/her remit; \\n provide direction and support to field staff and activities; \\n carry out monitoring, risk assessment and reporting in relation to the environment and practices that bear on the security of staff in the field (physical security, accommo\u00ad dation, programme fiscal and procurement practices, transport and communications); \\n support the efficient implementation of all DDR coordination projects; \\n develop and sustain optimal information feedback, in both directions, between the field and Headquarters; \\n support the DDR Unit in the collection of programme performance information, pro\u00ad gress and impact assessment; \\n collect the quantitative and qualitative information on programme implementation; \\n carry out follow\u00adup monitoring visits on activities of implementing partners and regional offices; \\n liaise with ex\u00adcombatants, beneficiaries, implementing partners and referral officer for proper sensitization and reinforcement of the programme; \\n create efficient early warning alert system and rapid response mechanisms for \u2018hot spot\u2019 development; \\n ensure DDR coordination programs complement each other and are implemented efficiently; \\n support liaison with the NCDDR and other agencies in relation to the reintegration of ex\u00adcombatants, CAAFG, WAAFG and war\u00adaffected people in the field; \\n provide guidance and on\u00adthe\u00adground support to reintegration officers; \\n liaise with Military Observers, Reintegration Unit and UN Police in accordance with the terms of reference; \\n liaise and coordinate with civil affairs section in matters of mutual interest; \\n carry out any other duties as directed by the DDR Unit.", + "Paragraph": "Under the overall supervision of the Chief of DDR Unit and working closely with the DDR Officer, the Field Coordination Officer carries out the work, information feedback and coordination of field rehabilitation and reintegration activities. The Field Coordination Officer will improve field supervision, sensitization, monitoring and evaluation mechanisms. He\/she will also assist in strengthening the working relationships of DDR staff with other peacekeeping mission substantive sections in the field. He\/she will also endeavour to strengthen, coordination and collaboration with government offices, the national commis\u00ad sion on DDR (NCDDR), international NGOs, NGOs (implementing partners) and other UN agencies working on reintegration in order to unify reintegration activities. The Field Coordination Officer will liaise closely with the DDR Officer\/Reintegration Officer and undertake the following duties: \n assist and advise DDR Unit in areas within his\/her remit; \n provide direction and support to field staff and activities; \n carry out monitoring, risk assessment and reporting in relation to the environment and practices that bear on the security of staff in the field (physical security, accommo\u00ad dation, programme fiscal and procurement practices, transport and communications); \n support the efficient implementation of all DDR coordination projects; \n develop and sustain optimal information feedback, in both directions, between the field and Headquarters; \n support the DDR Unit in the collection of programme performance information, pro\u00ad gress and impact assessment; \n collect the quantitative and qualitative information on programme implementation; \n carry out follow\u00adup monitoring visits on activities of implementing partners and regional offices; \n liaise with ex\u00adcombatants, beneficiaries, implementing partners and referral officer for proper sensitization and reinforcement of the programme; \n create efficient early warning alert system and rapid response mechanisms for \u2018hot spot\u2019 development; \n ensure DDR coordination programs complement each other and are implemented efficiently; \n support liaison with the NCDDR and other agencies in relation to the reintegration of ex\u00adcombatants, CAAFG, WAAFG and war\u00adaffected people in the field; \n provide guidance and on\u00adthe\u00adground support to reintegration officers; \n liaise with Military Observers, Reintegration Unit and UN Police in accordance with the terms of reference; \n liaise and coordinate with civil affairs section in matters of mutual interest; \n carry out any other duties as directed by the DDR Unit.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63480,7 +63480,7 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.10: DDR Field Coordination Officer (National)", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The Field Coordination Officer will liaise closely with the DDR Officer\/Reintegration Officer and undertake the following duties: \\n assist and advise DDR Unit in areas within his\/her remit; \\n provide direction and support to field staff and activities; \\n carry out monitoring, risk assessment and reporting in relation to the environment and practices that bear on the security of staff in the field (physical security, accommo\u00ad dation, programme fiscal and procurement practices, transport and communications); \\n support the efficient implementation of all DDR coordination projects; \\n develop and sustain optimal information feedback, in both directions, between the field and Headquarters; \\n support the DDR Unit in the collection of programme performance information, pro\u00ad gress and impact assessment; \\n collect the quantitative and qualitative information on programme implementation; \\n carry out follow\u00adup monitoring visits on activities of implementing partners and regional offices; \\n liaise with ex\u00adcombatants, beneficiaries, implementing partners and referral officer for proper sensitization and reinforcement of the programme; \\n create efficient early warning alert system and rapid response mechanisms for \u2018hot spot\u2019 development; \\n ensure DDR coordination programs complement each other and are implemented efficiently; \\n support liaison with the NCDDR and other agencies in relation to the reintegration of ex\u00adcombatants, CAAFG, WAAFG and war\u00adaffected people in the field; \\n provide guidance and on\u00adthe\u00adground support to reintegration officers; \\n liaise with Military Observers, Reintegration Unit and UN Police in accordance with the terms of reference; \\n liaise and coordinate with civil affairs section in matters of mutual interest; \\n carry out any other duties as directed by the DDR Unit.", + "Sentence": "The Field Coordination Officer will liaise closely with the DDR Officer\/Reintegration Officer and undertake the following duties: \n assist and advise DDR Unit in areas within his\/her remit; \n provide direction and support to field staff and activities; \n carry out monitoring, risk assessment and reporting in relation to the environment and practices that bear on the security of staff in the field (physical security, accommo\u00ad dation, programme fiscal and procurement practices, transport and communications); \n support the efficient implementation of all DDR coordination projects; \n develop and sustain optimal information feedback, in both directions, between the field and Headquarters; \n support the DDR Unit in the collection of programme performance information, pro\u00ad gress and impact assessment; \n collect the quantitative and qualitative information on programme implementation; \n carry out follow\u00adup monitoring visits on activities of implementing partners and regional offices; \n liaise with ex\u00adcombatants, beneficiaries, implementing partners and referral officer for proper sensitization and reinforcement of the programme; \n create efficient early warning alert system and rapid response mechanisms for \u2018hot spot\u2019 development; \n ensure DDR coordination programs complement each other and are implemented efficiently; \n support liaison with the NCDDR and other agencies in relation to the reintegration of ex\u00adcombatants, CAAFG, WAAFG and war\u00adaffected people in the field; \n provide guidance and on\u00adthe\u00adground support to reintegration officers; \n liaise with Military Observers, Reintegration Unit and UN Police in accordance with the terms of reference; \n liaise and coordinate with civil affairs section in matters of mutual interest; \n carry out any other duties as directed by the DDR Unit.", "newParagraph": "overall supervision chief ddr unit working closely ddr officer field coordination officer carry work information feedback coordination field rehabilitation reintegration activity field coordination officer improve field supervision sensitization monitoring evaluation mechanism heshe also assist strengthening working relationship ddr staff peacekeeping mission substantive section field heshe also endeavour strengthen coordination collaboration government office national commis sion ddr ncddr international ngo ngo implementing partner un agency working reintegration order unify reintegration activity field coordination officer liaise closely ddr officerreintegration officer undertake following duty n assist advise ddr unit area within hisher remit n provide direction support field staff activity n carry monitoring risk assessment reporting relation environment practice bear security staff field physical security accommo dation programme fiscal procurement practice transport communication n support efficient implementation ddr coordination project n develop sustain optimal information feedback direction field headquarters n support ddr unit collection programme performance information pro gress impact assessment n collect quantitative qualitative information programme implementation n carry follow monitoring visit activity implementing partner regional office n liaise ex combatant beneficiary implementing partner referral officer proper sensitization reinforcement programme n create efficient early warning alert system rapid response mechanism hot spot development n ensure ddr coordination program complement implemented efficiently n support liaison ncddr agency relation reintegration ex combatant caafg waafg war affected people field n provide guidance ground support reintegration officer n liaise military observer reintegration unit un police accordance term reference n liaise coordinate civil affair section matter mutual interest n carry duty directed ddr unit", "ProcessedSent": "field coordination officer liaise closely ddr officerreintegration officer undertake following duty n assist advise ddr unit area within hisher remit n provide direction support field staff activity n carry monitoring risk assessment reporting relation environment practice bear security staff field physical security accommo dation programme fiscal procurement practice transport communication n support efficient implementation ddr coordination project n develop sustain optimal information feedback direction field headquarters n support ddr unit collection programme performance information pro gress impact assessment n collect quantitative qualitative information programme implementation n carry follow monitoring visit activity implementing partner regional office n liaise ex combatant beneficiary implementing partner referral officer proper sensitization reinforcement programme n create efficient early warning alert system rapid response mechanism hot spot development n ensure ddr coordination program complement implemented efficiently n support liaison ncddr agency relation reintegration ex combatant caafg waafg war affected people field n provide guidance ground support reintegration officer n liaise military observer reintegration unit un police accordance term reference n liaise coordinate civil affair section matter mutual interest n carry duty directed ddr unit", "SentID": 3526 @@ -63505,7 +63505,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1152, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer is responsible for the follow\u00ad ing duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n formulate and implement, within the DDR programme, a small arms and light weapons (SALW) reduction and control project for the country in support of the peace process; \\n coordinate SALW reduction and control activities taking place in the country and among the parties, the national government, civil society and the donor community; \\n provide substantive technical inputs and advice to the Chief of the DDR Unit and the national authorities for the development of national legal instruments for the control of SALW; \\n undertake broad consultations with relevant stakeholders through inclusive and par\u00ad ticipatory processes through community\u00adbased violence and weapons reduction pro\u00ad gramme; \\n manage the collection of data on SALW stocks during the disengagement and DDR processes; \\n develop targeted training programmes for national institutions on SALW; \\n liaise closely with the gender and HIV\/AIDS adviser in the mission or these capacities seconded to the DDR Unit by UN entities to ensure that gender issues are adequately reflected in policy, legislation, programming and resource mobilization, and develop strategies for involvement of women in small arms management and control activities; \\n\\n ensure timely and effective delivery of project inputs and outputs; \\n\\n undertake continuous monitoring of project activities; produce top\u00adlevel progress and briefing reports; \\n support efforts in resource mobilization and development of strategic partnerships with multiple donors and agencies. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer is responsible for the follow\u00ad ing duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n formulate and implement, within the DDR programme, a small arms and light weapons (SALW) reduction and control project for the country in support of the peace process; \n coordinate SALW reduction and control activities taking place in the country and among the parties, the national government, civil society and the donor community; \n provide substantive technical inputs and advice to the Chief of the DDR Unit and the national authorities for the development of national legal instruments for the control of SALW; \n undertake broad consultations with relevant stakeholders through inclusive and par\u00ad ticipatory processes through community\u00adbased violence and weapons reduction pro\u00ad gramme; \n manage the collection of data on SALW stocks during the disengagement and DDR processes; \n develop targeted training programmes for national institutions on SALW; \n liaise closely with the gender and HIV\/AIDS adviser in the mission or these capacities seconded to the DDR Unit by UN entities to ensure that gender issues are adequately reflected in policy, legislation, programming and resource mobilization, and develop strategies for involvement of women in small arms management and control activities; \n\n ensure timely and effective delivery of project inputs and outputs; \n\n undertake continuous monitoring of project activities; produce top\u00adlevel progress and briefing reports; \n support efforts in resource mobilization and development of strategic partnerships with multiple donors and agencies. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63523,7 +63523,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1152, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer is responsible for the follow\u00ad ing duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n formulate and implement, within the DDR programme, a small arms and light weapons (SALW) reduction and control project for the country in support of the peace process; \\n coordinate SALW reduction and control activities taking place in the country and among the parties, the national government, civil society and the donor community; \\n provide substantive technical inputs and advice to the Chief of the DDR Unit and the national authorities for the development of national legal instruments for the control of SALW; \\n undertake broad consultations with relevant stakeholders through inclusive and par\u00ad ticipatory processes through community\u00adbased violence and weapons reduction pro\u00ad gramme; \\n manage the collection of data on SALW stocks during the disengagement and DDR processes; \\n develop targeted training programmes for national institutions on SALW; \\n liaise closely with the gender and HIV\/AIDS adviser in the mission or these capacities seconded to the DDR Unit by UN entities to ensure that gender issues are adequately reflected in policy, legislation, programming and resource mobilization, and develop strategies for involvement of women in small arms management and control activities; \\n\\n ensure timely and effective delivery of project inputs and outputs; \\n\\n undertake continuous monitoring of project activities; produce top\u00adlevel progress and briefing reports; \\n support efforts in resource mobilization and development of strategic partnerships with multiple donors and agencies. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer is responsible for the follow\u00ad ing duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n formulate and implement, within the DDR programme, a small arms and light weapons (SALW) reduction and control project for the country in support of the peace process; \n coordinate SALW reduction and control activities taking place in the country and among the parties, the national government, civil society and the donor community; \n provide substantive technical inputs and advice to the Chief of the DDR Unit and the national authorities for the development of national legal instruments for the control of SALW; \n undertake broad consultations with relevant stakeholders through inclusive and par\u00ad ticipatory processes through community\u00adbased violence and weapons reduction pro\u00ad gramme; \n manage the collection of data on SALW stocks during the disengagement and DDR processes; \n develop targeted training programmes for national institutions on SALW; \n liaise closely with the gender and HIV\/AIDS adviser in the mission or these capacities seconded to the DDR Unit by UN entities to ensure that gender issues are adequately reflected in policy, legislation, programming and resource mobilization, and develop strategies for involvement of women in small arms management and control activities; \n\n ensure timely and effective delivery of project inputs and outputs; \n\n undertake continuous monitoring of project activities; produce top\u00adlevel progress and briefing reports; \n support efforts in resource mobilization and development of strategic partnerships with multiple donors and agencies. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63541,7 +63541,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1152, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer is responsible for the follow\u00ad ing duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n formulate and implement, within the DDR programme, a small arms and light weapons (SALW) reduction and control project for the country in support of the peace process; \\n coordinate SALW reduction and control activities taking place in the country and among the parties, the national government, civil society and the donor community; \\n provide substantive technical inputs and advice to the Chief of the DDR Unit and the national authorities for the development of national legal instruments for the control of SALW; \\n undertake broad consultations with relevant stakeholders through inclusive and par\u00ad ticipatory processes through community\u00adbased violence and weapons reduction pro\u00ad gramme; \\n manage the collection of data on SALW stocks during the disengagement and DDR processes; \\n develop targeted training programmes for national institutions on SALW; \\n liaise closely with the gender and HIV\/AIDS adviser in the mission or these capacities seconded to the DDR Unit by UN entities to ensure that gender issues are adequately reflected in policy, legislation, programming and resource mobilization, and develop strategies for involvement of women in small arms management and control activities; \\n\\n ensure timely and effective delivery of project inputs and outputs; \\n\\n undertake continuous monitoring of project activities; produce top\u00adlevel progress and briefing reports; \\n support efforts in resource mobilization and development of strategic partnerships with multiple donors and agencies. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer is responsible for the follow\u00ad ing duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n formulate and implement, within the DDR programme, a small arms and light weapons (SALW) reduction and control project for the country in support of the peace process; \n coordinate SALW reduction and control activities taking place in the country and among the parties, the national government, civil society and the donor community; \n provide substantive technical inputs and advice to the Chief of the DDR Unit and the national authorities for the development of national legal instruments for the control of SALW; \n undertake broad consultations with relevant stakeholders through inclusive and par\u00ad ticipatory processes through community\u00adbased violence and weapons reduction pro\u00ad gramme; \n manage the collection of data on SALW stocks during the disengagement and DDR processes; \n develop targeted training programmes for national institutions on SALW; \n liaise closely with the gender and HIV\/AIDS adviser in the mission or these capacities seconded to the DDR Unit by UN entities to ensure that gender issues are adequately reflected in policy, legislation, programming and resource mobilization, and develop strategies for involvement of women in small arms management and control activities; \n\n ensure timely and effective delivery of project inputs and outputs; \n\n undertake continuous monitoring of project activities; produce top\u00adlevel progress and briefing reports; \n support efforts in resource mobilization and development of strategic partnerships with multiple donors and agencies. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63552,14 +63552,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.11: Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer (P3\u2013P4)", "Heading3": "Draft generic Job Profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer is responsible for the follow\u00ad ing duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate.", + "Sentence": "\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer is responsible for the follow\u00ad ing duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate.", "newParagraph": "organizational setting reporting relationship position located peace operation depending organizational structure mission location post incumbent may report directly chief ddr unit senior official charge ddr activity field location n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit small arm light weapon officer responsible follow ing duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn formulate implement within ddr programme small arm light weapon salw reduction control project country support peace process n coordinate salw reduction control activity taking place country among party national government civil society donor community n provide substantive technical input advice chief ddr unit national authority development national legal instrument control salw n undertake broad consultation relevant stakeholder inclusive par ticipatory process community based violence weapon reduction pro gramme n manage collection data salw stock disengagement ddr process n develop targeted training programme national institution salw n liaise closely gender hivaids adviser mission capacity seconded ddr unit un entity ensure gender issue adequately reflected policy legislation programming resource mobilization develop strategy involvement woman small arm management control activity nn ensure timely effective delivery project input output nn undertake continuous monitoring project activity produce top level progress briefing report n support effort resource mobilization development strategic partnership multiple donor agency nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit small arm light weapon officer responsible follow ing duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate", "SentID": 3530 }, { "ParagraphID": 1152, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer is responsible for the follow\u00ad ing duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n formulate and implement, within the DDR programme, a small arms and light weapons (SALW) reduction and control project for the country in support of the peace process; \\n coordinate SALW reduction and control activities taking place in the country and among the parties, the national government, civil society and the donor community; \\n provide substantive technical inputs and advice to the Chief of the DDR Unit and the national authorities for the development of national legal instruments for the control of SALW; \\n undertake broad consultations with relevant stakeholders through inclusive and par\u00ad ticipatory processes through community\u00adbased violence and weapons reduction pro\u00ad gramme; \\n manage the collection of data on SALW stocks during the disengagement and DDR processes; \\n develop targeted training programmes for national institutions on SALW; \\n liaise closely with the gender and HIV\/AIDS adviser in the mission or these capacities seconded to the DDR Unit by UN entities to ensure that gender issues are adequately reflected in policy, legislation, programming and resource mobilization, and develop strategies for involvement of women in small arms management and control activities; \\n\\n ensure timely and effective delivery of project inputs and outputs; \\n\\n undertake continuous monitoring of project activities; produce top\u00adlevel progress and briefing reports; \\n support efforts in resource mobilization and development of strategic partnerships with multiple donors and agencies. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer is responsible for the follow\u00ad ing duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n formulate and implement, within the DDR programme, a small arms and light weapons (SALW) reduction and control project for the country in support of the peace process; \n coordinate SALW reduction and control activities taking place in the country and among the parties, the national government, civil society and the donor community; \n provide substantive technical inputs and advice to the Chief of the DDR Unit and the national authorities for the development of national legal instruments for the control of SALW; \n undertake broad consultations with relevant stakeholders through inclusive and par\u00ad ticipatory processes through community\u00adbased violence and weapons reduction pro\u00ad gramme; \n manage the collection of data on SALW stocks during the disengagement and DDR processes; \n develop targeted training programmes for national institutions on SALW; \n liaise closely with the gender and HIV\/AIDS adviser in the mission or these capacities seconded to the DDR Unit by UN entities to ensure that gender issues are adequately reflected in policy, legislation, programming and resource mobilization, and develop strategies for involvement of women in small arms management and control activities; \n\n ensure timely and effective delivery of project inputs and outputs; \n\n undertake continuous monitoring of project activities; produce top\u00adlevel progress and briefing reports; \n support efforts in resource mobilization and development of strategic partnerships with multiple donors and agencies. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63577,7 +63577,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1152, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer is responsible for the follow\u00ad ing duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n formulate and implement, within the DDR programme, a small arms and light weapons (SALW) reduction and control project for the country in support of the peace process; \\n coordinate SALW reduction and control activities taking place in the country and among the parties, the national government, civil society and the donor community; \\n provide substantive technical inputs and advice to the Chief of the DDR Unit and the national authorities for the development of national legal instruments for the control of SALW; \\n undertake broad consultations with relevant stakeholders through inclusive and par\u00ad ticipatory processes through community\u00adbased violence and weapons reduction pro\u00ad gramme; \\n manage the collection of data on SALW stocks during the disengagement and DDR processes; \\n develop targeted training programmes for national institutions on SALW; \\n liaise closely with the gender and HIV\/AIDS adviser in the mission or these capacities seconded to the DDR Unit by UN entities to ensure that gender issues are adequately reflected in policy, legislation, programming and resource mobilization, and develop strategies for involvement of women in small arms management and control activities; \\n\\n ensure timely and effective delivery of project inputs and outputs; \\n\\n undertake continuous monitoring of project activities; produce top\u00adlevel progress and briefing reports; \\n support efforts in resource mobilization and development of strategic partnerships with multiple donors and agencies. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer is responsible for the follow\u00ad ing duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n formulate and implement, within the DDR programme, a small arms and light weapons (SALW) reduction and control project for the country in support of the peace process; \n coordinate SALW reduction and control activities taking place in the country and among the parties, the national government, civil society and the donor community; \n provide substantive technical inputs and advice to the Chief of the DDR Unit and the national authorities for the development of national legal instruments for the control of SALW; \n undertake broad consultations with relevant stakeholders through inclusive and par\u00ad ticipatory processes through community\u00adbased violence and weapons reduction pro\u00ad gramme; \n manage the collection of data on SALW stocks during the disengagement and DDR processes; \n develop targeted training programmes for national institutions on SALW; \n liaise closely with the gender and HIV\/AIDS adviser in the mission or these capacities seconded to the DDR Unit by UN entities to ensure that gender issues are adequately reflected in policy, legislation, programming and resource mobilization, and develop strategies for involvement of women in small arms management and control activities; \n\n ensure timely and effective delivery of project inputs and outputs; \n\n undertake continuous monitoring of project activities; produce top\u00adlevel progress and briefing reports; \n support efforts in resource mobilization and development of strategic partnerships with multiple donors and agencies. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63588,14 +63588,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.11: Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer (P3\u2013P4)", "Heading3": "Draft generic Job Profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n formulate and implement, within the DDR programme, a small arms and light weapons (SALW) reduction and control project for the country in support of the peace process; \\n coordinate SALW reduction and control activities taking place in the country and among the parties, the national government, civil society and the donor community; \\n provide substantive technical inputs and advice to the Chief of the DDR Unit and the national authorities for the development of national legal instruments for the control of SALW; \\n undertake broad consultations with relevant stakeholders through inclusive and par\u00ad ticipatory processes through community\u00adbased violence and weapons reduction pro\u00ad gramme; \\n manage the collection of data on SALW stocks during the disengagement and DDR processes; \\n develop targeted training programmes for national institutions on SALW; \\n liaise closely with the gender and HIV\/AIDS adviser in the mission or these capacities seconded to the DDR Unit by UN entities to ensure that gender issues are adequately reflected in policy, legislation, programming and resource mobilization, and develop strategies for involvement of women in small arms management and control activities; \\n\\n ensure timely and effective delivery of project inputs and outputs; \\n\\n undertake continuous monitoring of project activities; produce top\u00adlevel progress and briefing reports; \\n support efforts in resource mobilization and development of strategic partnerships with multiple donors and agencies.", + "Sentence": "\n\n formulate and implement, within the DDR programme, a small arms and light weapons (SALW) reduction and control project for the country in support of the peace process; \n coordinate SALW reduction and control activities taking place in the country and among the parties, the national government, civil society and the donor community; \n provide substantive technical inputs and advice to the Chief of the DDR Unit and the national authorities for the development of national legal instruments for the control of SALW; \n undertake broad consultations with relevant stakeholders through inclusive and par\u00ad ticipatory processes through community\u00adbased violence and weapons reduction pro\u00ad gramme; \n manage the collection of data on SALW stocks during the disengagement and DDR processes; \n develop targeted training programmes for national institutions on SALW; \n liaise closely with the gender and HIV\/AIDS adviser in the mission or these capacities seconded to the DDR Unit by UN entities to ensure that gender issues are adequately reflected in policy, legislation, programming and resource mobilization, and develop strategies for involvement of women in small arms management and control activities; \n\n ensure timely and effective delivery of project inputs and outputs; \n\n undertake continuous monitoring of project activities; produce top\u00adlevel progress and briefing reports; \n support efforts in resource mobilization and development of strategic partnerships with multiple donors and agencies.", "newParagraph": "organizational setting reporting relationship position located peace operation depending organizational structure mission location post incumbent may report directly chief ddr unit senior official charge ddr activity field location n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit small arm light weapon officer responsible follow ing duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn formulate implement within ddr programme small arm light weapon salw reduction control project country support peace process n coordinate salw reduction control activity taking place country among party national government civil society donor community n provide substantive technical input advice chief ddr unit national authority development national legal instrument control salw n undertake broad consultation relevant stakeholder inclusive par ticipatory process community based violence weapon reduction pro gramme n manage collection data salw stock disengagement ddr process n develop targeted training programme national institution salw n liaise closely gender hivaids adviser mission capacity seconded ddr unit un entity ensure gender issue adequately reflected policy legislation programming resource mobilization develop strategy involvement woman small arm management control activity nn ensure timely effective delivery project input output nn undertake continuous monitoring project activity produce top level progress briefing report n support effort resource mobilization development strategic partnership multiple donor agency nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "nn formulate implement within ddr programme small arm light weapon salw reduction control project country support peace process n coordinate salw reduction control activity taking place country among party national government civil society donor community n provide substantive technical input advice chief ddr unit national authority development national legal instrument control salw n undertake broad consultation relevant stakeholder inclusive par ticipatory process community based violence weapon reduction pro gramme n manage collection data salw stock disengagement ddr process n develop targeted training programme national institution salw n liaise closely gender hivaids adviser mission capacity seconded ddr unit un entity ensure gender issue adequately reflected policy legislation programming resource mobilization develop strategy involvement woman small arm management control activity nn ensure timely effective delivery project input output nn undertake continuous monitoring project activity produce top level progress briefing report n support effort resource mobilization development strategic partnership multiple donor agency", "SentID": 3532 }, { "ParagraphID": 1152, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer is responsible for the follow\u00ad ing duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n formulate and implement, within the DDR programme, a small arms and light weapons (SALW) reduction and control project for the country in support of the peace process; \\n coordinate SALW reduction and control activities taking place in the country and among the parties, the national government, civil society and the donor community; \\n provide substantive technical inputs and advice to the Chief of the DDR Unit and the national authorities for the development of national legal instruments for the control of SALW; \\n undertake broad consultations with relevant stakeholders through inclusive and par\u00ad ticipatory processes through community\u00adbased violence and weapons reduction pro\u00ad gramme; \\n manage the collection of data on SALW stocks during the disengagement and DDR processes; \\n develop targeted training programmes for national institutions on SALW; \\n liaise closely with the gender and HIV\/AIDS adviser in the mission or these capacities seconded to the DDR Unit by UN entities to ensure that gender issues are adequately reflected in policy, legislation, programming and resource mobilization, and develop strategies for involvement of women in small arms management and control activities; \\n\\n ensure timely and effective delivery of project inputs and outputs; \\n\\n undertake continuous monitoring of project activities; produce top\u00adlevel progress and briefing reports; \\n support efforts in resource mobilization and development of strategic partnerships with multiple donors and agencies. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer is responsible for the follow\u00ad ing duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n formulate and implement, within the DDR programme, a small arms and light weapons (SALW) reduction and control project for the country in support of the peace process; \n coordinate SALW reduction and control activities taking place in the country and among the parties, the national government, civil society and the donor community; \n provide substantive technical inputs and advice to the Chief of the DDR Unit and the national authorities for the development of national legal instruments for the control of SALW; \n undertake broad consultations with relevant stakeholders through inclusive and par\u00ad ticipatory processes through community\u00adbased violence and weapons reduction pro\u00ad gramme; \n manage the collection of data on SALW stocks during the disengagement and DDR processes; \n develop targeted training programmes for national institutions on SALW; \n liaise closely with the gender and HIV\/AIDS adviser in the mission or these capacities seconded to the DDR Unit by UN entities to ensure that gender issues are adequately reflected in policy, legislation, programming and resource mobilization, and develop strategies for involvement of women in small arms management and control activities; \n\n ensure timely and effective delivery of project inputs and outputs; \n\n undertake continuous monitoring of project activities; produce top\u00adlevel progress and briefing reports; \n support efforts in resource mobilization and development of strategic partnerships with multiple donors and agencies. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63606,14 +63606,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.11: Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer (P3\u2013P4)", "Heading3": "Draft generic Job Profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "newParagraph": "organizational setting reporting relationship position located peace operation depending organizational structure mission location post incumbent may report directly chief ddr unit senior official charge ddr activity field location n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit small arm light weapon officer responsible follow ing duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn formulate implement within ddr programme small arm light weapon salw reduction control project country support peace process n coordinate salw reduction control activity taking place country among party national government civil society donor community n provide substantive technical input advice chief ddr unit national authority development national legal instrument control salw n undertake broad consultation relevant stakeholder inclusive par ticipatory process community based violence weapon reduction pro gramme n manage collection data salw stock disengagement ddr process n develop targeted training programme national institution salw n liaise closely gender hivaids adviser mission capacity seconded ddr unit un entity ensure gender issue adequately reflected policy legislation programming resource mobilization develop strategy involvement woman small arm management control activity nn ensure timely effective delivery project input output nn undertake continuous monitoring project activity produce top level progress briefing report n support effort resource mobilization development strategic partnership multiple donor agency nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "SentID": 3533 }, { "ParagraphID": 1153, - "Paragraph": "Vision: An in\u00addepth understanding of the unit\u2019s strategic direction and ability to transform it into a results\u00adoriented work programme. \\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity. \\n Negotiation skills: Effective negotiating skills and ability to work with others to reach mutually benefiting and lasting understanding.", + "Paragraph": "Vision: An in\u00addepth understanding of the unit\u2019s strategic direction and ability to transform it into a results\u00adoriented work programme. \n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity. \n Negotiation skills: Effective negotiating skills and ability to work with others to reach mutually benefiting and lasting understanding.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63631,7 +63631,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1153, - "Paragraph": "Vision: An in\u00addepth understanding of the unit\u2019s strategic direction and ability to transform it into a results\u00adoriented work programme. \\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity. \\n Negotiation skills: Effective negotiating skills and ability to work with others to reach mutually benefiting and lasting understanding.", + "Paragraph": "Vision: An in\u00addepth understanding of the unit\u2019s strategic direction and ability to transform it into a results\u00adoriented work programme. \n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity. \n Negotiation skills: Effective negotiating skills and ability to work with others to reach mutually benefiting and lasting understanding.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63642,14 +63642,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.11: Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer (P3\u2013P4)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations.", + "Sentence": "\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations.", "newParagraph": "vision depth understanding unit strategic direction ability transform result oriented work programme n professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n leadership proven ability provide effective leadership transfer advice knowl edge staff level different national cultural background n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness sound judgement decision making skill n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication excellent effective communication verbal written skill includ ing ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity n negotiation skill effective negotiating skill ability work others reach mutually benefiting lasting understanding", "ProcessedSent": "n professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation", "SentID": 3535 }, { "ParagraphID": 1153, - "Paragraph": "Vision: An in\u00addepth understanding of the unit\u2019s strategic direction and ability to transform it into a results\u00adoriented work programme. \\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity. \\n Negotiation skills: Effective negotiating skills and ability to work with others to reach mutually benefiting and lasting understanding.", + "Paragraph": "Vision: An in\u00addepth understanding of the unit\u2019s strategic direction and ability to transform it into a results\u00adoriented work programme. \n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity. \n Negotiation skills: Effective negotiating skills and ability to work with others to reach mutually benefiting and lasting understanding.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63660,14 +63660,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.11: Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer (P3\u2013P4)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds.", + "Sentence": "\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds.", "newParagraph": "vision depth understanding unit strategic direction ability transform result oriented work programme n professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n leadership proven ability provide effective leadership transfer advice knowl edge staff level different national cultural background n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness sound judgement decision making skill n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication excellent effective communication verbal written skill includ ing ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity n negotiation skill effective negotiating skill ability work others reach mutually benefiting lasting understanding", "ProcessedSent": "n leadership proven ability provide effective leadership transfer advice knowl edge staff level different national cultural background", "SentID": 3536 }, { "ParagraphID": 1153, - "Paragraph": "Vision: An in\u00addepth understanding of the unit\u2019s strategic direction and ability to transform it into a results\u00adoriented work programme. \\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity. \\n Negotiation skills: Effective negotiating skills and ability to work with others to reach mutually benefiting and lasting understanding.", + "Paragraph": "Vision: An in\u00addepth understanding of the unit\u2019s strategic direction and ability to transform it into a results\u00adoriented work programme. \n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity. \n Negotiation skills: Effective negotiating skills and ability to work with others to reach mutually benefiting and lasting understanding.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63678,14 +63678,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.11: Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer (P3\u2013P4)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support.", + "Sentence": "\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support.", "newParagraph": "vision depth understanding unit strategic direction ability transform result oriented work programme n professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n leadership proven ability provide effective leadership transfer advice knowl edge staff level different national cultural background n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness sound judgement decision making skill n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication excellent effective communication verbal written skill includ ing ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity n negotiation skill effective negotiating skill ability work others reach mutually benefiting lasting understanding", "ProcessedSent": "n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support", "SentID": 3537 }, { "ParagraphID": 1153, - "Paragraph": "Vision: An in\u00addepth understanding of the unit\u2019s strategic direction and ability to transform it into a results\u00adoriented work programme. \\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity. \\n Negotiation skills: Effective negotiating skills and ability to work with others to reach mutually benefiting and lasting understanding.", + "Paragraph": "Vision: An in\u00addepth understanding of the unit\u2019s strategic direction and ability to transform it into a results\u00adoriented work programme. \n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity. \n Negotiation skills: Effective negotiating skills and ability to work with others to reach mutually benefiting and lasting understanding.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63696,14 +63696,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.11: Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer (P3\u2013P4)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills.", + "Sentence": "\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills.", "newParagraph": "vision depth understanding unit strategic direction ability transform result oriented work programme n professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n leadership proven ability provide effective leadership transfer advice knowl edge staff level different national cultural background n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness sound judgement decision making skill n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication excellent effective communication verbal written skill includ ing ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity n negotiation skill effective negotiating skill ability work others reach mutually benefiting lasting understanding", "ProcessedSent": "n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness sound judgement decision making skill", "SentID": 3538 }, { "ParagraphID": 1153, - "Paragraph": "Vision: An in\u00addepth understanding of the unit\u2019s strategic direction and ability to transform it into a results\u00adoriented work programme. \\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity. \\n Negotiation skills: Effective negotiating skills and ability to work with others to reach mutually benefiting and lasting understanding.", + "Paragraph": "Vision: An in\u00addepth understanding of the unit\u2019s strategic direction and ability to transform it into a results\u00adoriented work programme. \n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity. \n Negotiation skills: Effective negotiating skills and ability to work with others to reach mutually benefiting and lasting understanding.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63714,14 +63714,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.11: Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer (P3\u2013P4)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives.", + "Sentence": "\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives.", "newParagraph": "vision depth understanding unit strategic direction ability transform result oriented work programme n professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n leadership proven ability provide effective leadership transfer advice knowl edge staff level different national cultural background n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness sound judgement decision making skill n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication excellent effective communication verbal written skill includ ing ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity n negotiation skill effective negotiating skill ability work others reach mutually benefiting lasting understanding", "ProcessedSent": "n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative", "SentID": 3539 }, { "ParagraphID": 1153, - "Paragraph": "Vision: An in\u00addepth understanding of the unit\u2019s strategic direction and ability to transform it into a results\u00adoriented work programme. \\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity. \\n Negotiation skills: Effective negotiating skills and ability to work with others to reach mutually benefiting and lasting understanding.", + "Paragraph": "Vision: An in\u00addepth understanding of the unit\u2019s strategic direction and ability to transform it into a results\u00adoriented work programme. \n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity. \n Negotiation skills: Effective negotiating skills and ability to work with others to reach mutually benefiting and lasting understanding.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63732,14 +63732,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.11: Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer (P3\u2013P4)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs.", + "Sentence": "\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs.", "newParagraph": "vision depth understanding unit strategic direction ability transform result oriented work programme n professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n leadership proven ability provide effective leadership transfer advice knowl edge staff level different national cultural background n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness sound judgement decision making skill n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication excellent effective communication verbal written skill includ ing ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity n negotiation skill effective negotiating skill ability work others reach mutually benefiting lasting understanding", "ProcessedSent": "n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need", "SentID": 3540 }, { "ParagraphID": 1153, - "Paragraph": "Vision: An in\u00addepth understanding of the unit\u2019s strategic direction and ability to transform it into a results\u00adoriented work programme. \\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity. \\n Negotiation skills: Effective negotiating skills and ability to work with others to reach mutually benefiting and lasting understanding.", + "Paragraph": "Vision: An in\u00addepth understanding of the unit\u2019s strategic direction and ability to transform it into a results\u00adoriented work programme. \n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity. \n Negotiation skills: Effective negotiating skills and ability to work with others to reach mutually benefiting and lasting understanding.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63750,14 +63750,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.11: Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer (P3\u2013P4)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials.", + "Sentence": "\n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials.", "newParagraph": "vision depth understanding unit strategic direction ability transform result oriented work programme n professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n leadership proven ability provide effective leadership transfer advice knowl edge staff level different national cultural background n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness sound judgement decision making skill n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication excellent effective communication verbal written skill includ ing ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity n negotiation skill effective negotiating skill ability work others reach mutually benefiting lasting understanding", "ProcessedSent": "n communication excellent effective communication verbal written skill includ ing ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official", "SentID": 3541 }, { "ParagraphID": 1153, - "Paragraph": "Vision: An in\u00addepth understanding of the unit\u2019s strategic direction and ability to transform it into a results\u00adoriented work programme. \\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity. \\n Negotiation skills: Effective negotiating skills and ability to work with others to reach mutually benefiting and lasting understanding.", + "Paragraph": "Vision: An in\u00addepth understanding of the unit\u2019s strategic direction and ability to transform it into a results\u00adoriented work programme. \n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity. \n Negotiation skills: Effective negotiating skills and ability to work with others to reach mutually benefiting and lasting understanding.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63768,14 +63768,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.11: Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer (P3\u2013P4)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Sentence": "\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "newParagraph": "vision depth understanding unit strategic direction ability transform result oriented work programme n professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n leadership proven ability provide effective leadership transfer advice knowl edge staff level different national cultural background n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness sound judgement decision making skill n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication excellent effective communication verbal written skill includ ing ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity n negotiation skill effective negotiating skill ability work others reach mutually benefiting lasting understanding", "ProcessedSent": "n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "SentID": 3542 }, { "ParagraphID": 1153, - "Paragraph": "Vision: An in\u00addepth understanding of the unit\u2019s strategic direction and ability to transform it into a results\u00adoriented work programme. \\n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity. \\n Negotiation skills: Effective negotiating skills and ability to work with others to reach mutually benefiting and lasting understanding.", + "Paragraph": "Vision: An in\u00addepth understanding of the unit\u2019s strategic direction and ability to transform it into a results\u00adoriented work programme. \n Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Leadership: Proven ability to provide effective leadership and transfer advice and knowl\u00ad edge staff at all levels and from different national and cultural backgrounds. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness, sound judgement and decision\u00admaking skills. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Excellent and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, includ\u00ad ing ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating positions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity. \n Negotiation skills: Effective negotiating skills and ability to work with others to reach mutually benefiting and lasting understanding.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63786,14 +63786,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.11: Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer (P3\u2013P4)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Negotiation skills: Effective negotiating skills and ability to work with others to reach mutually benefiting and lasting understanding.", + "Sentence": "\n Negotiation skills: Effective negotiating skills and ability to work with others to reach mutually benefiting and lasting understanding.", "newParagraph": "vision depth understanding unit strategic direction ability transform result oriented work programme n professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n leadership proven ability provide effective leadership transfer advice knowl edge staff level different national cultural background n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness sound judgement decision making skill n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication excellent effective communication verbal written skill includ ing ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating position issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork excellent interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity n negotiation skill effective negotiating skill ability work others reach mutually benefiting lasting understanding", "ProcessedSent": "n negotiation skill effective negotiating skill ability work others reach mutually benefiting lasting understanding", "SentID": 3543 }, { "ParagraphID": 1154, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, progressive national and international experience and knowledge in development work, with specific focus on disarmament, demobilization, reintegration and small arms control programmes. An understanding of the literature on DDR and security sector reform. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, progressive national and international experience and knowledge in development work, with specific focus on disarmament, demobilization, reintegration and small arms control programmes. An understanding of the literature on DDR and security sector reform. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63811,7 +63811,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1154, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, progressive national and international experience and knowledge in development work, with specific focus on disarmament, demobilization, reintegration and small arms control programmes. An understanding of the literature on DDR and security sector reform. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, progressive national and international experience and knowledge in development work, with specific focus on disarmament, demobilization, reintegration and small arms control programmes. An understanding of the literature on DDR and security sector reform. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63829,7 +63829,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1154, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, progressive national and international experience and knowledge in development work, with specific focus on disarmament, demobilization, reintegration and small arms control programmes. An understanding of the literature on DDR and security sector reform. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, progressive national and international experience and knowledge in development work, with specific focus on disarmament, demobilization, reintegration and small arms control programmes. An understanding of the literature on DDR and security sector reform. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63840,14 +63840,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.11: Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer (P3\u2013P4)", "Heading3": "Qualifications", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, progressive national and international experience and knowledge in development work, with specific focus on disarmament, demobilization, reintegration and small arms control programmes.", + "Sentence": "\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, progressive national and international experience and knowledge in development work, with specific focus on disarmament, demobilization, reintegration and small arms control programmes.", "newParagraph": "education advanced university degree social science management economics business administration international development relevant field relevant combination academic qualification experience related area may accepted lieu advanced degree n work experience minimum five year substantial experience working post conflict progressive national international experience knowledge development work specific focus disarmament demobilization reintegration small arm control programme understanding literature ddr security sector reform n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "ProcessedSent": "n work experience minimum five year substantial experience working post conflict progressive national international experience knowledge development work specific focus disarmament demobilization reintegration small arm control programme", "SentID": 3546 }, { "ParagraphID": 1154, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, progressive national and international experience and knowledge in development work, with specific focus on disarmament, demobilization, reintegration and small arms control programmes. An understanding of the literature on DDR and security sector reform. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, progressive national and international experience and knowledge in development work, with specific focus on disarmament, demobilization, reintegration and small arms control programmes. An understanding of the literature on DDR and security sector reform. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63865,7 +63865,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1154, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, progressive national and international experience and knowledge in development work, with specific focus on disarmament, demobilization, reintegration and small arms control programmes. An understanding of the literature on DDR and security sector reform. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on post\u00adconflict, progressive national and international experience and knowledge in development work, with specific focus on disarmament, demobilization, reintegration and small arms control programmes. An understanding of the literature on DDR and security sector reform. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63876,7 +63876,7 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.11: Small Arms and Light Weapons Officer (P3\u2013P4)", "Heading3": "Qualifications", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Sentence": "\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "newParagraph": "education advanced university degree social science management economics business administration international development relevant field relevant combination academic qualification experience related area may accepted lieu advanced degree n work experience minimum five year substantial experience working post conflict progressive national international experience knowledge development work specific focus disarmament demobilization reintegration small arm control programme understanding literature ddr security sector reform n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "ProcessedSent": "n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "SentID": 3548 @@ -63901,7 +63901,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1156, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. This staff member is expected to be seconded from a UN specialized agency working on mainstreaming gender issues in post\u00adconflict peace\u00adbuilding, and is expected to work closely with the Gender Adviser of the peace\u00ad keeping mission. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Gender Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n ensure the full integration of gender through all DDR processes (including small arms) in the DDR programme; \\n provide close coordination and technical support to national institutions for DDR, particularly Offices of Gender, Special Groups and Reintegration; \\n provide support to decision\u00admaking and programme formulation on the DDR pro\u00ad gramme to ensure that gender issues are fully integrated and that the programme promotes equal involvement and access of women; \\n undertake ongoing monitoring and evaluation of the DDR process to ensure applica\u00ad tion of principles of gender sensitivity as stated in the peace agreement; \\n provide support to policy development in all areas of DDR to ensure integration of gender; \\n develop mechanisms to support the equal access and involvement of female combatants in the DDR process; \\n take the lead in development of advocacy strategies to gain commitment from key actors on gender issues within DDR; \\n support national parties in coordinating the profiling, documentation and dissemina\u00ad tion of data and issues relating to the presence and role of women and girls associated with the armed forces and groups, and militias; \\n review the differing needs of male and female ex\u00adcombatants during community\u00adbased reintegration, including analysis of reintegration opportunities and constraints, and advocate for these needs to be taken into account in DDR and community\u00adbased re\u00ad integration programming; \\n prepare and provide briefing notes and guidance for relevant actors, including national partners, UN agencies, international NGOs, donors and others, on gender in the con\u00ad text of DDR; \\n provide technical support and advice on gender to national partners on policy devel\u00ad opment related to DDR and human security; \\n develop tools and other practical guides for the implementation of gender within DDR and human security frameworks; \\n assist in the development of capacity\u00adbuilding activities for the national offices drawing on lessons learned on gender and DDR in the region, and facilitating regional resource networks on these issues; \\n participate in field missions and assessments related to human security and DDR to advise on gender issues. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. This staff member is expected to be seconded from a UN specialized agency working on mainstreaming gender issues in post\u00adconflict peace\u00adbuilding, and is expected to work closely with the Gender Adviser of the peace\u00ad keeping mission. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Gender Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n ensure the full integration of gender through all DDR processes (including small arms) in the DDR programme; \n provide close coordination and technical support to national institutions for DDR, particularly Offices of Gender, Special Groups and Reintegration; \n provide support to decision\u00admaking and programme formulation on the DDR pro\u00ad gramme to ensure that gender issues are fully integrated and that the programme promotes equal involvement and access of women; \n undertake ongoing monitoring and evaluation of the DDR process to ensure applica\u00ad tion of principles of gender sensitivity as stated in the peace agreement; \n provide support to policy development in all areas of DDR to ensure integration of gender; \n develop mechanisms to support the equal access and involvement of female combatants in the DDR process; \n take the lead in development of advocacy strategies to gain commitment from key actors on gender issues within DDR; \n support national parties in coordinating the profiling, documentation and dissemina\u00ad tion of data and issues relating to the presence and role of women and girls associated with the armed forces and groups, and militias; \n review the differing needs of male and female ex\u00adcombatants during community\u00adbased reintegration, including analysis of reintegration opportunities and constraints, and advocate for these needs to be taken into account in DDR and community\u00adbased re\u00ad integration programming; \n prepare and provide briefing notes and guidance for relevant actors, including national partners, UN agencies, international NGOs, donors and others, on gender in the con\u00ad text of DDR; \n provide technical support and advice on gender to national partners on policy devel\u00ad opment related to DDR and human security; \n develop tools and other practical guides for the implementation of gender within DDR and human security frameworks; \n assist in the development of capacity\u00adbuilding activities for the national offices drawing on lessons learned on gender and DDR in the region, and facilitating regional resource networks on these issues; \n participate in field missions and assessments related to human security and DDR to advise on gender issues. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63919,7 +63919,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1156, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. This staff member is expected to be seconded from a UN specialized agency working on mainstreaming gender issues in post\u00adconflict peace\u00adbuilding, and is expected to work closely with the Gender Adviser of the peace\u00ad keeping mission. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Gender Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n ensure the full integration of gender through all DDR processes (including small arms) in the DDR programme; \\n provide close coordination and technical support to national institutions for DDR, particularly Offices of Gender, Special Groups and Reintegration; \\n provide support to decision\u00admaking and programme formulation on the DDR pro\u00ad gramme to ensure that gender issues are fully integrated and that the programme promotes equal involvement and access of women; \\n undertake ongoing monitoring and evaluation of the DDR process to ensure applica\u00ad tion of principles of gender sensitivity as stated in the peace agreement; \\n provide support to policy development in all areas of DDR to ensure integration of gender; \\n develop mechanisms to support the equal access and involvement of female combatants in the DDR process; \\n take the lead in development of advocacy strategies to gain commitment from key actors on gender issues within DDR; \\n support national parties in coordinating the profiling, documentation and dissemina\u00ad tion of data and issues relating to the presence and role of women and girls associated with the armed forces and groups, and militias; \\n review the differing needs of male and female ex\u00adcombatants during community\u00adbased reintegration, including analysis of reintegration opportunities and constraints, and advocate for these needs to be taken into account in DDR and community\u00adbased re\u00ad integration programming; \\n prepare and provide briefing notes and guidance for relevant actors, including national partners, UN agencies, international NGOs, donors and others, on gender in the con\u00ad text of DDR; \\n provide technical support and advice on gender to national partners on policy devel\u00ad opment related to DDR and human security; \\n develop tools and other practical guides for the implementation of gender within DDR and human security frameworks; \\n assist in the development of capacity\u00adbuilding activities for the national offices drawing on lessons learned on gender and DDR in the region, and facilitating regional resource networks on these issues; \\n participate in field missions and assessments related to human security and DDR to advise on gender issues. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. This staff member is expected to be seconded from a UN specialized agency working on mainstreaming gender issues in post\u00adconflict peace\u00adbuilding, and is expected to work closely with the Gender Adviser of the peace\u00ad keeping mission. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Gender Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n ensure the full integration of gender through all DDR processes (including small arms) in the DDR programme; \n provide close coordination and technical support to national institutions for DDR, particularly Offices of Gender, Special Groups and Reintegration; \n provide support to decision\u00admaking and programme formulation on the DDR pro\u00ad gramme to ensure that gender issues are fully integrated and that the programme promotes equal involvement and access of women; \n undertake ongoing monitoring and evaluation of the DDR process to ensure applica\u00ad tion of principles of gender sensitivity as stated in the peace agreement; \n provide support to policy development in all areas of DDR to ensure integration of gender; \n develop mechanisms to support the equal access and involvement of female combatants in the DDR process; \n take the lead in development of advocacy strategies to gain commitment from key actors on gender issues within DDR; \n support national parties in coordinating the profiling, documentation and dissemina\u00ad tion of data and issues relating to the presence and role of women and girls associated with the armed forces and groups, and militias; \n review the differing needs of male and female ex\u00adcombatants during community\u00adbased reintegration, including analysis of reintegration opportunities and constraints, and advocate for these needs to be taken into account in DDR and community\u00adbased re\u00ad integration programming; \n prepare and provide briefing notes and guidance for relevant actors, including national partners, UN agencies, international NGOs, donors and others, on gender in the con\u00ad text of DDR; \n provide technical support and advice on gender to national partners on policy devel\u00ad opment related to DDR and human security; \n develop tools and other practical guides for the implementation of gender within DDR and human security frameworks; \n assist in the development of capacity\u00adbuilding activities for the national offices drawing on lessons learned on gender and DDR in the region, and facilitating regional resource networks on these issues; \n participate in field missions and assessments related to human security and DDR to advise on gender issues. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63937,7 +63937,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1156, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. This staff member is expected to be seconded from a UN specialized agency working on mainstreaming gender issues in post\u00adconflict peace\u00adbuilding, and is expected to work closely with the Gender Adviser of the peace\u00ad keeping mission. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Gender Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n ensure the full integration of gender through all DDR processes (including small arms) in the DDR programme; \\n provide close coordination and technical support to national institutions for DDR, particularly Offices of Gender, Special Groups and Reintegration; \\n provide support to decision\u00admaking and programme formulation on the DDR pro\u00ad gramme to ensure that gender issues are fully integrated and that the programme promotes equal involvement and access of women; \\n undertake ongoing monitoring and evaluation of the DDR process to ensure applica\u00ad tion of principles of gender sensitivity as stated in the peace agreement; \\n provide support to policy development in all areas of DDR to ensure integration of gender; \\n develop mechanisms to support the equal access and involvement of female combatants in the DDR process; \\n take the lead in development of advocacy strategies to gain commitment from key actors on gender issues within DDR; \\n support national parties in coordinating the profiling, documentation and dissemina\u00ad tion of data and issues relating to the presence and role of women and girls associated with the armed forces and groups, and militias; \\n review the differing needs of male and female ex\u00adcombatants during community\u00adbased reintegration, including analysis of reintegration opportunities and constraints, and advocate for these needs to be taken into account in DDR and community\u00adbased re\u00ad integration programming; \\n prepare and provide briefing notes and guidance for relevant actors, including national partners, UN agencies, international NGOs, donors and others, on gender in the con\u00ad text of DDR; \\n provide technical support and advice on gender to national partners on policy devel\u00ad opment related to DDR and human security; \\n develop tools and other practical guides for the implementation of gender within DDR and human security frameworks; \\n assist in the development of capacity\u00adbuilding activities for the national offices drawing on lessons learned on gender and DDR in the region, and facilitating regional resource networks on these issues; \\n participate in field missions and assessments related to human security and DDR to advise on gender issues. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. This staff member is expected to be seconded from a UN specialized agency working on mainstreaming gender issues in post\u00adconflict peace\u00adbuilding, and is expected to work closely with the Gender Adviser of the peace\u00ad keeping mission. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Gender Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n ensure the full integration of gender through all DDR processes (including small arms) in the DDR programme; \n provide close coordination and technical support to national institutions for DDR, particularly Offices of Gender, Special Groups and Reintegration; \n provide support to decision\u00admaking and programme formulation on the DDR pro\u00ad gramme to ensure that gender issues are fully integrated and that the programme promotes equal involvement and access of women; \n undertake ongoing monitoring and evaluation of the DDR process to ensure applica\u00ad tion of principles of gender sensitivity as stated in the peace agreement; \n provide support to policy development in all areas of DDR to ensure integration of gender; \n develop mechanisms to support the equal access and involvement of female combatants in the DDR process; \n take the lead in development of advocacy strategies to gain commitment from key actors on gender issues within DDR; \n support national parties in coordinating the profiling, documentation and dissemina\u00ad tion of data and issues relating to the presence and role of women and girls associated with the armed forces and groups, and militias; \n review the differing needs of male and female ex\u00adcombatants during community\u00adbased reintegration, including analysis of reintegration opportunities and constraints, and advocate for these needs to be taken into account in DDR and community\u00adbased re\u00ad integration programming; \n prepare and provide briefing notes and guidance for relevant actors, including national partners, UN agencies, international NGOs, donors and others, on gender in the con\u00ad text of DDR; \n provide technical support and advice on gender to national partners on policy devel\u00ad opment related to DDR and human security; \n develop tools and other practical guides for the implementation of gender within DDR and human security frameworks; \n assist in the development of capacity\u00adbuilding activities for the national offices drawing on lessons learned on gender and DDR in the region, and facilitating regional resource networks on these issues; \n participate in field missions and assessments related to human security and DDR to advise on gender issues. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63955,7 +63955,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1156, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. This staff member is expected to be seconded from a UN specialized agency working on mainstreaming gender issues in post\u00adconflict peace\u00adbuilding, and is expected to work closely with the Gender Adviser of the peace\u00ad keeping mission. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Gender Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n ensure the full integration of gender through all DDR processes (including small arms) in the DDR programme; \\n provide close coordination and technical support to national institutions for DDR, particularly Offices of Gender, Special Groups and Reintegration; \\n provide support to decision\u00admaking and programme formulation on the DDR pro\u00ad gramme to ensure that gender issues are fully integrated and that the programme promotes equal involvement and access of women; \\n undertake ongoing monitoring and evaluation of the DDR process to ensure applica\u00ad tion of principles of gender sensitivity as stated in the peace agreement; \\n provide support to policy development in all areas of DDR to ensure integration of gender; \\n develop mechanisms to support the equal access and involvement of female combatants in the DDR process; \\n take the lead in development of advocacy strategies to gain commitment from key actors on gender issues within DDR; \\n support national parties in coordinating the profiling, documentation and dissemina\u00ad tion of data and issues relating to the presence and role of women and girls associated with the armed forces and groups, and militias; \\n review the differing needs of male and female ex\u00adcombatants during community\u00adbased reintegration, including analysis of reintegration opportunities and constraints, and advocate for these needs to be taken into account in DDR and community\u00adbased re\u00ad integration programming; \\n prepare and provide briefing notes and guidance for relevant actors, including national partners, UN agencies, international NGOs, donors and others, on gender in the con\u00ad text of DDR; \\n provide technical support and advice on gender to national partners on policy devel\u00ad opment related to DDR and human security; \\n develop tools and other practical guides for the implementation of gender within DDR and human security frameworks; \\n assist in the development of capacity\u00adbuilding activities for the national offices drawing on lessons learned on gender and DDR in the region, and facilitating regional resource networks on these issues; \\n participate in field missions and assessments related to human security and DDR to advise on gender issues. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. This staff member is expected to be seconded from a UN specialized agency working on mainstreaming gender issues in post\u00adconflict peace\u00adbuilding, and is expected to work closely with the Gender Adviser of the peace\u00ad keeping mission. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Gender Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n ensure the full integration of gender through all DDR processes (including small arms) in the DDR programme; \n provide close coordination and technical support to national institutions for DDR, particularly Offices of Gender, Special Groups and Reintegration; \n provide support to decision\u00admaking and programme formulation on the DDR pro\u00ad gramme to ensure that gender issues are fully integrated and that the programme promotes equal involvement and access of women; \n undertake ongoing monitoring and evaluation of the DDR process to ensure applica\u00ad tion of principles of gender sensitivity as stated in the peace agreement; \n provide support to policy development in all areas of DDR to ensure integration of gender; \n develop mechanisms to support the equal access and involvement of female combatants in the DDR process; \n take the lead in development of advocacy strategies to gain commitment from key actors on gender issues within DDR; \n support national parties in coordinating the profiling, documentation and dissemina\u00ad tion of data and issues relating to the presence and role of women and girls associated with the armed forces and groups, and militias; \n review the differing needs of male and female ex\u00adcombatants during community\u00adbased reintegration, including analysis of reintegration opportunities and constraints, and advocate for these needs to be taken into account in DDR and community\u00adbased re\u00ad integration programming; \n prepare and provide briefing notes and guidance for relevant actors, including national partners, UN agencies, international NGOs, donors and others, on gender in the con\u00ad text of DDR; \n provide technical support and advice on gender to national partners on policy devel\u00ad opment related to DDR and human security; \n develop tools and other practical guides for the implementation of gender within DDR and human security frameworks; \n assist in the development of capacity\u00adbuilding activities for the national offices drawing on lessons learned on gender and DDR in the region, and facilitating regional resource networks on these issues; \n participate in field missions and assessments related to human security and DDR to advise on gender issues. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63966,14 +63966,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.12: DDR Gender Officer (P3\u2013P2)", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Gender Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate.", + "Sentence": "\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Gender Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate.", "newParagraph": "organizational setting reporting relationship position located peace operation depending organizational structure mission location post incumbent may report directly chief ddr unit senior official charge ddr activity field location staff member expected seconded un specialized agency working mainstreaming gender issue post conflict peace building expected work closely gender adviser peace keeping mission n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit ddr gender officer responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn ensure full integration gender ddr process including small arm ddr programme n provide close coordination technical support national institution ddr particularly office gender special group reintegration n provide support decision making programme formulation ddr pro gramme ensure gender issue fully integrated programme promotes equal involvement access woman n undertake ongoing monitoring evaluation ddr process ensure applica tion principle gender sensitivity stated peace agreement n provide support policy development area ddr ensure integration gender n develop mechanism support equal access involvement female combatant ddr process n take lead development advocacy strategy gain commitment key actor gender issue within ddr n support national party coordinating profiling documentation dissemina tion data issue relating presence role woman girl associated armed force group militia n review differing need male female ex combatant community based reintegration including analysis reintegration opportunity constraint advocate need taken account ddr community based integration programming n prepare provide briefing note guidance relevant actor including national partner un agency international ngo donor others gender con text ddr n provide technical support advice gender national partner policy devel opment related ddr human security n develop tool practical guide implementation gender within ddr human security framework n assist development capacity building activity national office drawing lesson learned gender ddr region facilitating regional resource network issue n participate field mission assessment related human security ddr advise gender issue nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit ddr gender officer responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate", "SentID": 3553 }, { "ParagraphID": 1156, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. This staff member is expected to be seconded from a UN specialized agency working on mainstreaming gender issues in post\u00adconflict peace\u00adbuilding, and is expected to work closely with the Gender Adviser of the peace\u00ad keeping mission. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Gender Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n ensure the full integration of gender through all DDR processes (including small arms) in the DDR programme; \\n provide close coordination and technical support to national institutions for DDR, particularly Offices of Gender, Special Groups and Reintegration; \\n provide support to decision\u00admaking and programme formulation on the DDR pro\u00ad gramme to ensure that gender issues are fully integrated and that the programme promotes equal involvement and access of women; \\n undertake ongoing monitoring and evaluation of the DDR process to ensure applica\u00ad tion of principles of gender sensitivity as stated in the peace agreement; \\n provide support to policy development in all areas of DDR to ensure integration of gender; \\n develop mechanisms to support the equal access and involvement of female combatants in the DDR process; \\n take the lead in development of advocacy strategies to gain commitment from key actors on gender issues within DDR; \\n support national parties in coordinating the profiling, documentation and dissemina\u00ad tion of data and issues relating to the presence and role of women and girls associated with the armed forces and groups, and militias; \\n review the differing needs of male and female ex\u00adcombatants during community\u00adbased reintegration, including analysis of reintegration opportunities and constraints, and advocate for these needs to be taken into account in DDR and community\u00adbased re\u00ad integration programming; \\n prepare and provide briefing notes and guidance for relevant actors, including national partners, UN agencies, international NGOs, donors and others, on gender in the con\u00ad text of DDR; \\n provide technical support and advice on gender to national partners on policy devel\u00ad opment related to DDR and human security; \\n develop tools and other practical guides for the implementation of gender within DDR and human security frameworks; \\n assist in the development of capacity\u00adbuilding activities for the national offices drawing on lessons learned on gender and DDR in the region, and facilitating regional resource networks on these issues; \\n participate in field missions and assessments related to human security and DDR to advise on gender issues. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. This staff member is expected to be seconded from a UN specialized agency working on mainstreaming gender issues in post\u00adconflict peace\u00adbuilding, and is expected to work closely with the Gender Adviser of the peace\u00ad keeping mission. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Gender Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n ensure the full integration of gender through all DDR processes (including small arms) in the DDR programme; \n provide close coordination and technical support to national institutions for DDR, particularly Offices of Gender, Special Groups and Reintegration; \n provide support to decision\u00admaking and programme formulation on the DDR pro\u00ad gramme to ensure that gender issues are fully integrated and that the programme promotes equal involvement and access of women; \n undertake ongoing monitoring and evaluation of the DDR process to ensure applica\u00ad tion of principles of gender sensitivity as stated in the peace agreement; \n provide support to policy development in all areas of DDR to ensure integration of gender; \n develop mechanisms to support the equal access and involvement of female combatants in the DDR process; \n take the lead in development of advocacy strategies to gain commitment from key actors on gender issues within DDR; \n support national parties in coordinating the profiling, documentation and dissemina\u00ad tion of data and issues relating to the presence and role of women and girls associated with the armed forces and groups, and militias; \n review the differing needs of male and female ex\u00adcombatants during community\u00adbased reintegration, including analysis of reintegration opportunities and constraints, and advocate for these needs to be taken into account in DDR and community\u00adbased re\u00ad integration programming; \n prepare and provide briefing notes and guidance for relevant actors, including national partners, UN agencies, international NGOs, donors and others, on gender in the con\u00ad text of DDR; \n provide technical support and advice on gender to national partners on policy devel\u00ad opment related to DDR and human security; \n develop tools and other practical guides for the implementation of gender within DDR and human security frameworks; \n assist in the development of capacity\u00adbuilding activities for the national offices drawing on lessons learned on gender and DDR in the region, and facilitating regional resource networks on these issues; \n participate in field missions and assessments related to human security and DDR to advise on gender issues. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -63991,7 +63991,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1156, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. This staff member is expected to be seconded from a UN specialized agency working on mainstreaming gender issues in post\u00adconflict peace\u00adbuilding, and is expected to work closely with the Gender Adviser of the peace\u00ad keeping mission. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Gender Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n ensure the full integration of gender through all DDR processes (including small arms) in the DDR programme; \\n provide close coordination and technical support to national institutions for DDR, particularly Offices of Gender, Special Groups and Reintegration; \\n provide support to decision\u00admaking and programme formulation on the DDR pro\u00ad gramme to ensure that gender issues are fully integrated and that the programme promotes equal involvement and access of women; \\n undertake ongoing monitoring and evaluation of the DDR process to ensure applica\u00ad tion of principles of gender sensitivity as stated in the peace agreement; \\n provide support to policy development in all areas of DDR to ensure integration of gender; \\n develop mechanisms to support the equal access and involvement of female combatants in the DDR process; \\n take the lead in development of advocacy strategies to gain commitment from key actors on gender issues within DDR; \\n support national parties in coordinating the profiling, documentation and dissemina\u00ad tion of data and issues relating to the presence and role of women and girls associated with the armed forces and groups, and militias; \\n review the differing needs of male and female ex\u00adcombatants during community\u00adbased reintegration, including analysis of reintegration opportunities and constraints, and advocate for these needs to be taken into account in DDR and community\u00adbased re\u00ad integration programming; \\n prepare and provide briefing notes and guidance for relevant actors, including national partners, UN agencies, international NGOs, donors and others, on gender in the con\u00ad text of DDR; \\n provide technical support and advice on gender to national partners on policy devel\u00ad opment related to DDR and human security; \\n develop tools and other practical guides for the implementation of gender within DDR and human security frameworks; \\n assist in the development of capacity\u00adbuilding activities for the national offices drawing on lessons learned on gender and DDR in the region, and facilitating regional resource networks on these issues; \\n participate in field missions and assessments related to human security and DDR to advise on gender issues. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. This staff member is expected to be seconded from a UN specialized agency working on mainstreaming gender issues in post\u00adconflict peace\u00adbuilding, and is expected to work closely with the Gender Adviser of the peace\u00ad keeping mission. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Gender Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n ensure the full integration of gender through all DDR processes (including small arms) in the DDR programme; \n provide close coordination and technical support to national institutions for DDR, particularly Offices of Gender, Special Groups and Reintegration; \n provide support to decision\u00admaking and programme formulation on the DDR pro\u00ad gramme to ensure that gender issues are fully integrated and that the programme promotes equal involvement and access of women; \n undertake ongoing monitoring and evaluation of the DDR process to ensure applica\u00ad tion of principles of gender sensitivity as stated in the peace agreement; \n provide support to policy development in all areas of DDR to ensure integration of gender; \n develop mechanisms to support the equal access and involvement of female combatants in the DDR process; \n take the lead in development of advocacy strategies to gain commitment from key actors on gender issues within DDR; \n support national parties in coordinating the profiling, documentation and dissemina\u00ad tion of data and issues relating to the presence and role of women and girls associated with the armed forces and groups, and militias; \n review the differing needs of male and female ex\u00adcombatants during community\u00adbased reintegration, including analysis of reintegration opportunities and constraints, and advocate for these needs to be taken into account in DDR and community\u00adbased re\u00ad integration programming; \n prepare and provide briefing notes and guidance for relevant actors, including national partners, UN agencies, international NGOs, donors and others, on gender in the con\u00ad text of DDR; \n provide technical support and advice on gender to national partners on policy devel\u00ad opment related to DDR and human security; \n develop tools and other practical guides for the implementation of gender within DDR and human security frameworks; \n assist in the development of capacity\u00adbuilding activities for the national offices drawing on lessons learned on gender and DDR in the region, and facilitating regional resource networks on these issues; \n participate in field missions and assessments related to human security and DDR to advise on gender issues. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64002,14 +64002,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.12: DDR Gender Officer (P3\u2013P2)", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n ensure the full integration of gender through all DDR processes (including small arms) in the DDR programme; \\n provide close coordination and technical support to national institutions for DDR, particularly Offices of Gender, Special Groups and Reintegration; \\n provide support to decision\u00admaking and programme formulation on the DDR pro\u00ad gramme to ensure that gender issues are fully integrated and that the programme promotes equal involvement and access of women; \\n undertake ongoing monitoring and evaluation of the DDR process to ensure applica\u00ad tion of principles of gender sensitivity as stated in the peace agreement; \\n provide support to policy development in all areas of DDR to ensure integration of gender; \\n develop mechanisms to support the equal access and involvement of female combatants in the DDR process; \\n take the lead in development of advocacy strategies to gain commitment from key actors on gender issues within DDR; \\n support national parties in coordinating the profiling, documentation and dissemina\u00ad tion of data and issues relating to the presence and role of women and girls associated with the armed forces and groups, and militias; \\n review the differing needs of male and female ex\u00adcombatants during community\u00adbased reintegration, including analysis of reintegration opportunities and constraints, and advocate for these needs to be taken into account in DDR and community\u00adbased re\u00ad integration programming; \\n prepare and provide briefing notes and guidance for relevant actors, including national partners, UN agencies, international NGOs, donors and others, on gender in the con\u00ad text of DDR; \\n provide technical support and advice on gender to national partners on policy devel\u00ad opment related to DDR and human security; \\n develop tools and other practical guides for the implementation of gender within DDR and human security frameworks; \\n assist in the development of capacity\u00adbuilding activities for the national offices drawing on lessons learned on gender and DDR in the region, and facilitating regional resource networks on these issues; \\n participate in field missions and assessments related to human security and DDR to advise on gender issues.", + "Sentence": "\n\n ensure the full integration of gender through all DDR processes (including small arms) in the DDR programme; \n provide close coordination and technical support to national institutions for DDR, particularly Offices of Gender, Special Groups and Reintegration; \n provide support to decision\u00admaking and programme formulation on the DDR pro\u00ad gramme to ensure that gender issues are fully integrated and that the programme promotes equal involvement and access of women; \n undertake ongoing monitoring and evaluation of the DDR process to ensure applica\u00ad tion of principles of gender sensitivity as stated in the peace agreement; \n provide support to policy development in all areas of DDR to ensure integration of gender; \n develop mechanisms to support the equal access and involvement of female combatants in the DDR process; \n take the lead in development of advocacy strategies to gain commitment from key actors on gender issues within DDR; \n support national parties in coordinating the profiling, documentation and dissemina\u00ad tion of data and issues relating to the presence and role of women and girls associated with the armed forces and groups, and militias; \n review the differing needs of male and female ex\u00adcombatants during community\u00adbased reintegration, including analysis of reintegration opportunities and constraints, and advocate for these needs to be taken into account in DDR and community\u00adbased re\u00ad integration programming; \n prepare and provide briefing notes and guidance for relevant actors, including national partners, UN agencies, international NGOs, donors and others, on gender in the con\u00ad text of DDR; \n provide technical support and advice on gender to national partners on policy devel\u00ad opment related to DDR and human security; \n develop tools and other practical guides for the implementation of gender within DDR and human security frameworks; \n assist in the development of capacity\u00adbuilding activities for the national offices drawing on lessons learned on gender and DDR in the region, and facilitating regional resource networks on these issues; \n participate in field missions and assessments related to human security and DDR to advise on gender issues.", "newParagraph": "organizational setting reporting relationship position located peace operation depending organizational structure mission location post incumbent may report directly chief ddr unit senior official charge ddr activity field location staff member expected seconded un specialized agency working mainstreaming gender issue post conflict peace building expected work closely gender adviser peace keeping mission n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit ddr gender officer responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn ensure full integration gender ddr process including small arm ddr programme n provide close coordination technical support national institution ddr particularly office gender special group reintegration n provide support decision making programme formulation ddr pro gramme ensure gender issue fully integrated programme promotes equal involvement access woman n undertake ongoing monitoring evaluation ddr process ensure applica tion principle gender sensitivity stated peace agreement n provide support policy development area ddr ensure integration gender n develop mechanism support equal access involvement female combatant ddr process n take lead development advocacy strategy gain commitment key actor gender issue within ddr n support national party coordinating profiling documentation dissemina tion data issue relating presence role woman girl associated armed force group militia n review differing need male female ex combatant community based reintegration including analysis reintegration opportunity constraint advocate need taken account ddr community based integration programming n prepare provide briefing note guidance relevant actor including national partner un agency international ngo donor others gender con text ddr n provide technical support advice gender national partner policy devel opment related ddr human security n develop tool practical guide implementation gender within ddr human security framework n assist development capacity building activity national office drawing lesson learned gender ddr region facilitating regional resource network issue n participate field mission assessment related human security ddr advise gender issue nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "nn ensure full integration gender ddr process including small arm ddr programme n provide close coordination technical support national institution ddr particularly office gender special group reintegration n provide support decision making programme formulation ddr pro gramme ensure gender issue fully integrated programme promotes equal involvement access woman n undertake ongoing monitoring evaluation ddr process ensure applica tion principle gender sensitivity stated peace agreement n provide support policy development area ddr ensure integration gender n develop mechanism support equal access involvement female combatant ddr process n take lead development advocacy strategy gain commitment key actor gender issue within ddr n support national party coordinating profiling documentation dissemina tion data issue relating presence role woman girl associated armed force group militia n review differing need male female ex combatant community based reintegration including analysis reintegration opportunity constraint advocate need taken account ddr community based integration programming n prepare provide briefing note guidance relevant actor including national partner un agency international ngo donor others gender con text ddr n provide technical support advice gender national partner policy devel opment related ddr human security n develop tool practical guide implementation gender within ddr human security framework n assist development capacity building activity national office drawing lesson learned gender ddr region facilitating regional resource network issue n participate field mission assessment related human security ddr advise gender issue", "SentID": 3555 }, { "ParagraphID": 1156, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. This staff member is expected to be seconded from a UN specialized agency working on mainstreaming gender issues in post\u00adconflict peace\u00adbuilding, and is expected to work closely with the Gender Adviser of the peace\u00ad keeping mission. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Gender Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n ensure the full integration of gender through all DDR processes (including small arms) in the DDR programme; \\n provide close coordination and technical support to national institutions for DDR, particularly Offices of Gender, Special Groups and Reintegration; \\n provide support to decision\u00admaking and programme formulation on the DDR pro\u00ad gramme to ensure that gender issues are fully integrated and that the programme promotes equal involvement and access of women; \\n undertake ongoing monitoring and evaluation of the DDR process to ensure applica\u00ad tion of principles of gender sensitivity as stated in the peace agreement; \\n provide support to policy development in all areas of DDR to ensure integration of gender; \\n develop mechanisms to support the equal access and involvement of female combatants in the DDR process; \\n take the lead in development of advocacy strategies to gain commitment from key actors on gender issues within DDR; \\n support national parties in coordinating the profiling, documentation and dissemina\u00ad tion of data and issues relating to the presence and role of women and girls associated with the armed forces and groups, and militias; \\n review the differing needs of male and female ex\u00adcombatants during community\u00adbased reintegration, including analysis of reintegration opportunities and constraints, and advocate for these needs to be taken into account in DDR and community\u00adbased re\u00ad integration programming; \\n prepare and provide briefing notes and guidance for relevant actors, including national partners, UN agencies, international NGOs, donors and others, on gender in the con\u00ad text of DDR; \\n provide technical support and advice on gender to national partners on policy devel\u00ad opment related to DDR and human security; \\n develop tools and other practical guides for the implementation of gender within DDR and human security frameworks; \\n assist in the development of capacity\u00adbuilding activities for the national offices drawing on lessons learned on gender and DDR in the region, and facilitating regional resource networks on these issues; \\n participate in field missions and assessments related to human security and DDR to advise on gender issues. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. This staff member is expected to be seconded from a UN specialized agency working on mainstreaming gender issues in post\u00adconflict peace\u00adbuilding, and is expected to work closely with the Gender Adviser of the peace\u00ad keeping mission. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR Gender Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n ensure the full integration of gender through all DDR processes (including small arms) in the DDR programme; \n provide close coordination and technical support to national institutions for DDR, particularly Offices of Gender, Special Groups and Reintegration; \n provide support to decision\u00admaking and programme formulation on the DDR pro\u00ad gramme to ensure that gender issues are fully integrated and that the programme promotes equal involvement and access of women; \n undertake ongoing monitoring and evaluation of the DDR process to ensure applica\u00ad tion of principles of gender sensitivity as stated in the peace agreement; \n provide support to policy development in all areas of DDR to ensure integration of gender; \n develop mechanisms to support the equal access and involvement of female combatants in the DDR process; \n take the lead in development of advocacy strategies to gain commitment from key actors on gender issues within DDR; \n support national parties in coordinating the profiling, documentation and dissemina\u00ad tion of data and issues relating to the presence and role of women and girls associated with the armed forces and groups, and militias; \n review the differing needs of male and female ex\u00adcombatants during community\u00adbased reintegration, including analysis of reintegration opportunities and constraints, and advocate for these needs to be taken into account in DDR and community\u00adbased re\u00ad integration programming; \n prepare and provide briefing notes and guidance for relevant actors, including national partners, UN agencies, international NGOs, donors and others, on gender in the con\u00ad text of DDR; \n provide technical support and advice on gender to national partners on policy devel\u00ad opment related to DDR and human security; \n develop tools and other practical guides for the implementation of gender within DDR and human security frameworks; \n assist in the development of capacity\u00adbuilding activities for the national offices drawing on lessons learned on gender and DDR in the region, and facilitating regional resource networks on these issues; \n participate in field missions and assessments related to human security and DDR to advise on gender issues. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64020,14 +64020,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.12: DDR Gender Officer (P3\u2013P2)", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "newParagraph": "organizational setting reporting relationship position located peace operation depending organizational structure mission location post incumbent may report directly chief ddr unit senior official charge ddr activity field location staff member expected seconded un specialized agency working mainstreaming gender issue post conflict peace building expected work closely gender adviser peace keeping mission n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit ddr gender officer responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn ensure full integration gender ddr process including small arm ddr programme n provide close coordination technical support national institution ddr particularly office gender special group reintegration n provide support decision making programme formulation ddr pro gramme ensure gender issue fully integrated programme promotes equal involvement access woman n undertake ongoing monitoring evaluation ddr process ensure applica tion principle gender sensitivity stated peace agreement n provide support policy development area ddr ensure integration gender n develop mechanism support equal access involvement female combatant ddr process n take lead development advocacy strategy gain commitment key actor gender issue within ddr n support national party coordinating profiling documentation dissemina tion data issue relating presence role woman girl associated armed force group militia n review differing need male female ex combatant community based reintegration including analysis reintegration opportunity constraint advocate need taken account ddr community based integration programming n prepare provide briefing note guidance relevant actor including national partner un agency international ngo donor others gender con text ddr n provide technical support advice gender national partner policy devel opment related ddr human security n develop tool practical guide implementation gender within ddr human security framework n assist development capacity building activity national office drawing lesson learned gender ddr region facilitating regional resource network issue n participate field mission assessment related human security ddr advise gender issue nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "SentID": 3556 }, { "ParagraphID": 1157, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64045,7 +64045,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1157, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64056,14 +64056,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.12: DDR Gender Officer (P3\u2013P2)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support.", + "Sentence": "\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support", "SentID": 3558 }, { "ParagraphID": 1157, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64074,14 +64074,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.12: DDR Gender Officer (P3\u2013P2)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness.", + "Sentence": "\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness", "SentID": 3559 }, { "ParagraphID": 1157, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64092,14 +64092,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.12: DDR Gender Officer (P3\u2013P2)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives.", + "Sentence": "\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative", "SentID": 3560 }, { "ParagraphID": 1157, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64110,14 +64110,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.12: DDR Gender Officer (P3\u2013P2)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs.", + "Sentence": "\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need", "SentID": 3561 }, { "ParagraphID": 1157, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64128,14 +64128,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.12: DDR Gender Officer (P3\u2013P2)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials.", + "Sentence": "\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official", "SentID": 3562 }, { "ParagraphID": 1157, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00ad tions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64146,14 +64146,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.12: DDR Gender Officer (P3\u2013P2)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", + "Sentence": "\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity respect diversity", "SentID": 3563 }, { "ParagraphID": 1158, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on gender issues in post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on gender issues in post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64171,7 +64171,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1158, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on gender issues in post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on gender issues in post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64189,7 +64189,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1158, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on gender issues in post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on gender issues in post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64200,14 +64200,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.12: DDR Gender Officer (P3\u2013P2)", "Heading3": "Qualifications", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on gender issues in post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues.", + "Sentence": "\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on gender issues in post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues.", "newParagraph": "education advanced university degree social science management economics business administration international development relevant field relevant combination academic qualification experience related area may accepted lieu advanced degree n work experience minimum five year substantial experience working gender issue post conflict crisis economic recovery issue n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "ProcessedSent": "n work experience minimum five year substantial experience working gender issue post conflict crisis economic recovery issue", "SentID": 3566 }, { "ParagraphID": 1158, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on gender issues in post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on gender issues in post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64218,7 +64218,7 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.12: DDR Gender Officer (P3\u2013P2)", "Heading3": "Qualifications", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Sentence": "\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "newParagraph": "education advanced university degree social science management economics business administration international development relevant field relevant combination academic qualification experience related area may accepted lieu advanced degree n work experience minimum five year substantial experience working gender issue post conflict crisis economic recovery issue n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "ProcessedSent": "n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "SentID": 3567 @@ -64243,7 +64243,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1160, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. This staff member is expected to be seconded from a UN specialized agency working on mainstreaming activities to deal with the HIV\/ AIDS issue in post\u00adconflict peace\u00adbuilding and is expected to work closely with the HIV\/ AIDS adviser of the peacekeeping mission. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR HIV\/AIDS Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n ensure the full integration of activities to address the HIV\/AIDS issue through all phases of the DDR programme; \\n provide close coordination and technical support to national institutions for DDR, par\u00ad ticularly offices of HIV\/AIDS reintegration; \\n support national parties in coordinating the profiling, documentation and dissemina\u00ad tion of data and issues relating to the presence and role of women and girls associated with the armed forces and groups; \\n document and disseminate data and issues relating to HIV\/AIDS as well as the factors fuelling the epidemic in the armed forces and groups; \\n prepare and provide briefing notes and guidance for relevant actors including national partners, UN agencies, international NGOs, donors and others on gender and HIV\/ AIDS in the context of DDR; \\n provide technical support and advice on HIV\/AIDS to national partners on policy development related to DDR and human security; \\n develop tools and other practical guides for the implementation of HIV\/AIDS strategies within DDR and human security frameworks; \\n generate effective results\u00adoriented partnerships among different partners, civil society and community\u00adbased actors to implement a consolidated response to HIV\/AIDS within the framework of the DDR programme. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. This staff member is expected to be seconded from a UN specialized agency working on mainstreaming activities to deal with the HIV\/ AIDS issue in post\u00adconflict peace\u00adbuilding and is expected to work closely with the HIV\/ AIDS adviser of the peacekeeping mission. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR HIV\/AIDS Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n ensure the full integration of activities to address the HIV\/AIDS issue through all phases of the DDR programme; \n provide close coordination and technical support to national institutions for DDR, par\u00ad ticularly offices of HIV\/AIDS reintegration; \n support national parties in coordinating the profiling, documentation and dissemina\u00ad tion of data and issues relating to the presence and role of women and girls associated with the armed forces and groups; \n document and disseminate data and issues relating to HIV\/AIDS as well as the factors fuelling the epidemic in the armed forces and groups; \n prepare and provide briefing notes and guidance for relevant actors including national partners, UN agencies, international NGOs, donors and others on gender and HIV\/ AIDS in the context of DDR; \n provide technical support and advice on HIV\/AIDS to national partners on policy development related to DDR and human security; \n develop tools and other practical guides for the implementation of HIV\/AIDS strategies within DDR and human security frameworks; \n generate effective results\u00adoriented partnerships among different partners, civil society and community\u00adbased actors to implement a consolidated response to HIV\/AIDS within the framework of the DDR programme. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64261,7 +64261,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1160, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. This staff member is expected to be seconded from a UN specialized agency working on mainstreaming activities to deal with the HIV\/ AIDS issue in post\u00adconflict peace\u00adbuilding and is expected to work closely with the HIV\/ AIDS adviser of the peacekeeping mission. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR HIV\/AIDS Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n ensure the full integration of activities to address the HIV\/AIDS issue through all phases of the DDR programme; \\n provide close coordination and technical support to national institutions for DDR, par\u00ad ticularly offices of HIV\/AIDS reintegration; \\n support national parties in coordinating the profiling, documentation and dissemina\u00ad tion of data and issues relating to the presence and role of women and girls associated with the armed forces and groups; \\n document and disseminate data and issues relating to HIV\/AIDS as well as the factors fuelling the epidemic in the armed forces and groups; \\n prepare and provide briefing notes and guidance for relevant actors including national partners, UN agencies, international NGOs, donors and others on gender and HIV\/ AIDS in the context of DDR; \\n provide technical support and advice on HIV\/AIDS to national partners on policy development related to DDR and human security; \\n develop tools and other practical guides for the implementation of HIV\/AIDS strategies within DDR and human security frameworks; \\n generate effective results\u00adoriented partnerships among different partners, civil society and community\u00adbased actors to implement a consolidated response to HIV\/AIDS within the framework of the DDR programme. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. This staff member is expected to be seconded from a UN specialized agency working on mainstreaming activities to deal with the HIV\/ AIDS issue in post\u00adconflict peace\u00adbuilding and is expected to work closely with the HIV\/ AIDS adviser of the peacekeeping mission. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR HIV\/AIDS Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n ensure the full integration of activities to address the HIV\/AIDS issue through all phases of the DDR programme; \n provide close coordination and technical support to national institutions for DDR, par\u00ad ticularly offices of HIV\/AIDS reintegration; \n support national parties in coordinating the profiling, documentation and dissemina\u00ad tion of data and issues relating to the presence and role of women and girls associated with the armed forces and groups; \n document and disseminate data and issues relating to HIV\/AIDS as well as the factors fuelling the epidemic in the armed forces and groups; \n prepare and provide briefing notes and guidance for relevant actors including national partners, UN agencies, international NGOs, donors and others on gender and HIV\/ AIDS in the context of DDR; \n provide technical support and advice on HIV\/AIDS to national partners on policy development related to DDR and human security; \n develop tools and other practical guides for the implementation of HIV\/AIDS strategies within DDR and human security frameworks; \n generate effective results\u00adoriented partnerships among different partners, civil society and community\u00adbased actors to implement a consolidated response to HIV\/AIDS within the framework of the DDR programme. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64279,7 +64279,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1160, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. This staff member is expected to be seconded from a UN specialized agency working on mainstreaming activities to deal with the HIV\/ AIDS issue in post\u00adconflict peace\u00adbuilding and is expected to work closely with the HIV\/ AIDS adviser of the peacekeeping mission. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR HIV\/AIDS Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n ensure the full integration of activities to address the HIV\/AIDS issue through all phases of the DDR programme; \\n provide close coordination and technical support to national institutions for DDR, par\u00ad ticularly offices of HIV\/AIDS reintegration; \\n support national parties in coordinating the profiling, documentation and dissemina\u00ad tion of data and issues relating to the presence and role of women and girls associated with the armed forces and groups; \\n document and disseminate data and issues relating to HIV\/AIDS as well as the factors fuelling the epidemic in the armed forces and groups; \\n prepare and provide briefing notes and guidance for relevant actors including national partners, UN agencies, international NGOs, donors and others on gender and HIV\/ AIDS in the context of DDR; \\n provide technical support and advice on HIV\/AIDS to national partners on policy development related to DDR and human security; \\n develop tools and other practical guides for the implementation of HIV\/AIDS strategies within DDR and human security frameworks; \\n generate effective results\u00adoriented partnerships among different partners, civil society and community\u00adbased actors to implement a consolidated response to HIV\/AIDS within the framework of the DDR programme. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. This staff member is expected to be seconded from a UN specialized agency working on mainstreaming activities to deal with the HIV\/ AIDS issue in post\u00adconflict peace\u00adbuilding and is expected to work closely with the HIV\/ AIDS adviser of the peacekeeping mission. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR HIV\/AIDS Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n ensure the full integration of activities to address the HIV\/AIDS issue through all phases of the DDR programme; \n provide close coordination and technical support to national institutions for DDR, par\u00ad ticularly offices of HIV\/AIDS reintegration; \n support national parties in coordinating the profiling, documentation and dissemina\u00ad tion of data and issues relating to the presence and role of women and girls associated with the armed forces and groups; \n document and disseminate data and issues relating to HIV\/AIDS as well as the factors fuelling the epidemic in the armed forces and groups; \n prepare and provide briefing notes and guidance for relevant actors including national partners, UN agencies, international NGOs, donors and others on gender and HIV\/ AIDS in the context of DDR; \n provide technical support and advice on HIV\/AIDS to national partners on policy development related to DDR and human security; \n develop tools and other practical guides for the implementation of HIV\/AIDS strategies within DDR and human security frameworks; \n generate effective results\u00adoriented partnerships among different partners, civil society and community\u00adbased actors to implement a consolidated response to HIV\/AIDS within the framework of the DDR programme. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64297,7 +64297,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1160, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. This staff member is expected to be seconded from a UN specialized agency working on mainstreaming activities to deal with the HIV\/ AIDS issue in post\u00adconflict peace\u00adbuilding and is expected to work closely with the HIV\/ AIDS adviser of the peacekeeping mission. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR HIV\/AIDS Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n ensure the full integration of activities to address the HIV\/AIDS issue through all phases of the DDR programme; \\n provide close coordination and technical support to national institutions for DDR, par\u00ad ticularly offices of HIV\/AIDS reintegration; \\n support national parties in coordinating the profiling, documentation and dissemina\u00ad tion of data and issues relating to the presence and role of women and girls associated with the armed forces and groups; \\n document and disseminate data and issues relating to HIV\/AIDS as well as the factors fuelling the epidemic in the armed forces and groups; \\n prepare and provide briefing notes and guidance for relevant actors including national partners, UN agencies, international NGOs, donors and others on gender and HIV\/ AIDS in the context of DDR; \\n provide technical support and advice on HIV\/AIDS to national partners on policy development related to DDR and human security; \\n develop tools and other practical guides for the implementation of HIV\/AIDS strategies within DDR and human security frameworks; \\n generate effective results\u00adoriented partnerships among different partners, civil society and community\u00adbased actors to implement a consolidated response to HIV\/AIDS within the framework of the DDR programme. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. This staff member is expected to be seconded from a UN specialized agency working on mainstreaming activities to deal with the HIV\/ AIDS issue in post\u00adconflict peace\u00adbuilding and is expected to work closely with the HIV\/ AIDS adviser of the peacekeeping mission. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR HIV\/AIDS Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n ensure the full integration of activities to address the HIV\/AIDS issue through all phases of the DDR programme; \n provide close coordination and technical support to national institutions for DDR, par\u00ad ticularly offices of HIV\/AIDS reintegration; \n support national parties in coordinating the profiling, documentation and dissemina\u00ad tion of data and issues relating to the presence and role of women and girls associated with the armed forces and groups; \n document and disseminate data and issues relating to HIV\/AIDS as well as the factors fuelling the epidemic in the armed forces and groups; \n prepare and provide briefing notes and guidance for relevant actors including national partners, UN agencies, international NGOs, donors and others on gender and HIV\/ AIDS in the context of DDR; \n provide technical support and advice on HIV\/AIDS to national partners on policy development related to DDR and human security; \n develop tools and other practical guides for the implementation of HIV\/AIDS strategies within DDR and human security frameworks; \n generate effective results\u00adoriented partnerships among different partners, civil society and community\u00adbased actors to implement a consolidated response to HIV\/AIDS within the framework of the DDR programme. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64308,14 +64308,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.13: DDR HIV\/AIDS Officer (P3\u2013P2)", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR HIV\/AIDS Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate.", + "Sentence": "\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR HIV\/AIDS Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate.", "newParagraph": "organizational setting reporting relationship position located peace operation depending organizational structure mission location post incumbent may report directly chief ddr unit senior official charge ddr activity field location staff member expected seconded un specialized agency working mainstreaming activity deal hiv aid issue post conflict peace building expected work closely hiv aid adviser peacekeeping mission n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit ddr hivaids officer responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn ensure full integration activity address hivaids issue phase ddr programme n provide close coordination technical support national institution ddr par ticularly office hivaids reintegration n support national party coordinating profiling documentation dissemina tion data issue relating presence role woman girl associated armed force group n document disseminate data issue relating hivaids well factor fuelling epidemic armed force group n prepare provide briefing note guidance relevant actor including national partner un agency international ngo donor others gender hiv aid context ddr n provide technical support advice hivaids national partner policy development related ddr human security n develop tool practical guide implementation hivaids strategy within ddr human security framework n generate effective result oriented partnership among different partner civil society community based actor implement consolidated response hivaids within framework ddr programme nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit ddr hivaids officer responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate", "SentID": 3572 }, { "ParagraphID": 1160, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. This staff member is expected to be seconded from a UN specialized agency working on mainstreaming activities to deal with the HIV\/ AIDS issue in post\u00adconflict peace\u00adbuilding and is expected to work closely with the HIV\/ AIDS adviser of the peacekeeping mission. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR HIV\/AIDS Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n ensure the full integration of activities to address the HIV\/AIDS issue through all phases of the DDR programme; \\n provide close coordination and technical support to national institutions for DDR, par\u00ad ticularly offices of HIV\/AIDS reintegration; \\n support national parties in coordinating the profiling, documentation and dissemina\u00ad tion of data and issues relating to the presence and role of women and girls associated with the armed forces and groups; \\n document and disseminate data and issues relating to HIV\/AIDS as well as the factors fuelling the epidemic in the armed forces and groups; \\n prepare and provide briefing notes and guidance for relevant actors including national partners, UN agencies, international NGOs, donors and others on gender and HIV\/ AIDS in the context of DDR; \\n provide technical support and advice on HIV\/AIDS to national partners on policy development related to DDR and human security; \\n develop tools and other practical guides for the implementation of HIV\/AIDS strategies within DDR and human security frameworks; \\n generate effective results\u00adoriented partnerships among different partners, civil society and community\u00adbased actors to implement a consolidated response to HIV\/AIDS within the framework of the DDR programme. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. This staff member is expected to be seconded from a UN specialized agency working on mainstreaming activities to deal with the HIV\/ AIDS issue in post\u00adconflict peace\u00adbuilding and is expected to work closely with the HIV\/ AIDS adviser of the peacekeeping mission. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR HIV\/AIDS Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n ensure the full integration of activities to address the HIV\/AIDS issue through all phases of the DDR programme; \n provide close coordination and technical support to national institutions for DDR, par\u00ad ticularly offices of HIV\/AIDS reintegration; \n support national parties in coordinating the profiling, documentation and dissemina\u00ad tion of data and issues relating to the presence and role of women and girls associated with the armed forces and groups; \n document and disseminate data and issues relating to HIV\/AIDS as well as the factors fuelling the epidemic in the armed forces and groups; \n prepare and provide briefing notes and guidance for relevant actors including national partners, UN agencies, international NGOs, donors and others on gender and HIV\/ AIDS in the context of DDR; \n provide technical support and advice on HIV\/AIDS to national partners on policy development related to DDR and human security; \n develop tools and other practical guides for the implementation of HIV\/AIDS strategies within DDR and human security frameworks; \n generate effective results\u00adoriented partnerships among different partners, civil society and community\u00adbased actors to implement a consolidated response to HIV\/AIDS within the framework of the DDR programme. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64333,7 +64333,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1160, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. This staff member is expected to be seconded from a UN specialized agency working on mainstreaming activities to deal with the HIV\/ AIDS issue in post\u00adconflict peace\u00adbuilding and is expected to work closely with the HIV\/ AIDS adviser of the peacekeeping mission. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR HIV\/AIDS Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n ensure the full integration of activities to address the HIV\/AIDS issue through all phases of the DDR programme; \\n provide close coordination and technical support to national institutions for DDR, par\u00ad ticularly offices of HIV\/AIDS reintegration; \\n support national parties in coordinating the profiling, documentation and dissemina\u00ad tion of data and issues relating to the presence and role of women and girls associated with the armed forces and groups; \\n document and disseminate data and issues relating to HIV\/AIDS as well as the factors fuelling the epidemic in the armed forces and groups; \\n prepare and provide briefing notes and guidance for relevant actors including national partners, UN agencies, international NGOs, donors and others on gender and HIV\/ AIDS in the context of DDR; \\n provide technical support and advice on HIV\/AIDS to national partners on policy development related to DDR and human security; \\n develop tools and other practical guides for the implementation of HIV\/AIDS strategies within DDR and human security frameworks; \\n generate effective results\u00adoriented partnerships among different partners, civil society and community\u00adbased actors to implement a consolidated response to HIV\/AIDS within the framework of the DDR programme. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. This staff member is expected to be seconded from a UN specialized agency working on mainstreaming activities to deal with the HIV\/ AIDS issue in post\u00adconflict peace\u00adbuilding and is expected to work closely with the HIV\/ AIDS adviser of the peacekeeping mission. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR HIV\/AIDS Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n ensure the full integration of activities to address the HIV\/AIDS issue through all phases of the DDR programme; \n provide close coordination and technical support to national institutions for DDR, par\u00ad ticularly offices of HIV\/AIDS reintegration; \n support national parties in coordinating the profiling, documentation and dissemina\u00ad tion of data and issues relating to the presence and role of women and girls associated with the armed forces and groups; \n document and disseminate data and issues relating to HIV\/AIDS as well as the factors fuelling the epidemic in the armed forces and groups; \n prepare and provide briefing notes and guidance for relevant actors including national partners, UN agencies, international NGOs, donors and others on gender and HIV\/ AIDS in the context of DDR; \n provide technical support and advice on HIV\/AIDS to national partners on policy development related to DDR and human security; \n develop tools and other practical guides for the implementation of HIV\/AIDS strategies within DDR and human security frameworks; \n generate effective results\u00adoriented partnerships among different partners, civil society and community\u00adbased actors to implement a consolidated response to HIV\/AIDS within the framework of the DDR programme. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64344,14 +64344,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.13: DDR HIV\/AIDS Officer (P3\u2013P2)", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n ensure the full integration of activities to address the HIV\/AIDS issue through all phases of the DDR programme; \\n provide close coordination and technical support to national institutions for DDR, par\u00ad ticularly offices of HIV\/AIDS reintegration; \\n support national parties in coordinating the profiling, documentation and dissemina\u00ad tion of data and issues relating to the presence and role of women and girls associated with the armed forces and groups; \\n document and disseminate data and issues relating to HIV\/AIDS as well as the factors fuelling the epidemic in the armed forces and groups; \\n prepare and provide briefing notes and guidance for relevant actors including national partners, UN agencies, international NGOs, donors and others on gender and HIV\/ AIDS in the context of DDR; \\n provide technical support and advice on HIV\/AIDS to national partners on policy development related to DDR and human security; \\n develop tools and other practical guides for the implementation of HIV\/AIDS strategies within DDR and human security frameworks; \\n generate effective results\u00adoriented partnerships among different partners, civil society and community\u00adbased actors to implement a consolidated response to HIV\/AIDS within the framework of the DDR programme.", + "Sentence": "\n\n ensure the full integration of activities to address the HIV\/AIDS issue through all phases of the DDR programme; \n provide close coordination and technical support to national institutions for DDR, par\u00ad ticularly offices of HIV\/AIDS reintegration; \n support national parties in coordinating the profiling, documentation and dissemina\u00ad tion of data and issues relating to the presence and role of women and girls associated with the armed forces and groups; \n document and disseminate data and issues relating to HIV\/AIDS as well as the factors fuelling the epidemic in the armed forces and groups; \n prepare and provide briefing notes and guidance for relevant actors including national partners, UN agencies, international NGOs, donors and others on gender and HIV\/ AIDS in the context of DDR; \n provide technical support and advice on HIV\/AIDS to national partners on policy development related to DDR and human security; \n develop tools and other practical guides for the implementation of HIV\/AIDS strategies within DDR and human security frameworks; \n generate effective results\u00adoriented partnerships among different partners, civil society and community\u00adbased actors to implement a consolidated response to HIV\/AIDS within the framework of the DDR programme.", "newParagraph": "organizational setting reporting relationship position located peace operation depending organizational structure mission location post incumbent may report directly chief ddr unit senior official charge ddr activity field location staff member expected seconded un specialized agency working mainstreaming activity deal hiv aid issue post conflict peace building expected work closely hiv aid adviser peacekeeping mission n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit ddr hivaids officer responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn ensure full integration activity address hivaids issue phase ddr programme n provide close coordination technical support national institution ddr par ticularly office hivaids reintegration n support national party coordinating profiling documentation dissemina tion data issue relating presence role woman girl associated armed force group n document disseminate data issue relating hivaids well factor fuelling epidemic armed force group n prepare provide briefing note guidance relevant actor including national partner un agency international ngo donor others gender hiv aid context ddr n provide technical support advice hivaids national partner policy development related ddr human security n develop tool practical guide implementation hivaids strategy within ddr human security framework n generate effective result oriented partnership among different partner civil society community based actor implement consolidated response hivaids within framework ddr programme nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "nn ensure full integration activity address hivaids issue phase ddr programme n provide close coordination technical support national institution ddr par ticularly office hivaids reintegration n support national party coordinating profiling documentation dissemina tion data issue relating presence role woman girl associated armed force group n document disseminate data issue relating hivaids well factor fuelling epidemic armed force group n prepare provide briefing note guidance relevant actor including national partner un agency international ngo donor others gender hiv aid context ddr n provide technical support advice hivaids national partner policy development related ddr human security n develop tool practical guide implementation hivaids strategy within ddr human security framework n generate effective result oriented partnership among different partner civil society community based actor implement consolidated response hivaids within framework ddr programme", "SentID": 3574 }, { "ParagraphID": 1160, - "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. This staff member is expected to be seconded from a UN specialized agency working on mainstreaming activities to deal with the HIV\/ AIDS issue in post\u00adconflict peace\u00adbuilding and is expected to work closely with the HIV\/ AIDS adviser of the peacekeeping mission. \\n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR HIV\/AIDS Officer is responsible for the following duties: \\n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \\n\\n ensure the full integration of activities to address the HIV\/AIDS issue through all phases of the DDR programme; \\n provide close coordination and technical support to national institutions for DDR, par\u00ad ticularly offices of HIV\/AIDS reintegration; \\n support national parties in coordinating the profiling, documentation and dissemina\u00ad tion of data and issues relating to the presence and role of women and girls associated with the armed forces and groups; \\n document and disseminate data and issues relating to HIV\/AIDS as well as the factors fuelling the epidemic in the armed forces and groups; \\n prepare and provide briefing notes and guidance for relevant actors including national partners, UN agencies, international NGOs, donors and others on gender and HIV\/ AIDS in the context of DDR; \\n provide technical support and advice on HIV\/AIDS to national partners on policy development related to DDR and human security; \\n develop tools and other practical guides for the implementation of HIV\/AIDS strategies within DDR and human security frameworks; \\n generate effective results\u00adoriented partnerships among different partners, civil society and community\u00adbased actors to implement a consolidated response to HIV\/AIDS within the framework of the DDR programme. \\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Organizational setting and reporting relationship: These positions are located in peace operations. Depending on the organizational structure of the mission and location of the post, the incumbent may report directly to the Chief of the DDR Unit or to a senior official in charge of DDR activities in a field location. This staff member is expected to be seconded from a UN specialized agency working on mainstreaming activities to deal with the HIV\/ AIDS issue in post\u00adconflict peace\u00adbuilding and is expected to work closely with the HIV\/ AIDS adviser of the peacekeeping mission. \n Accountabilities: Within limits of delegated authority and under the supervision of the Chief of the DDR Unit, the DDR HIV\/AIDS Officer is responsible for the following duties: \n (These functions are generic and may vary depending on the mission\u2019s mandate. Therefore, incumbents may carry out most, but not all, of the functions listed.) \n\n ensure the full integration of activities to address the HIV\/AIDS issue through all phases of the DDR programme; \n provide close coordination and technical support to national institutions for DDR, par\u00ad ticularly offices of HIV\/AIDS reintegration; \n support national parties in coordinating the profiling, documentation and dissemina\u00ad tion of data and issues relating to the presence and role of women and girls associated with the armed forces and groups; \n document and disseminate data and issues relating to HIV\/AIDS as well as the factors fuelling the epidemic in the armed forces and groups; \n prepare and provide briefing notes and guidance for relevant actors including national partners, UN agencies, international NGOs, donors and others on gender and HIV\/ AIDS in the context of DDR; \n provide technical support and advice on HIV\/AIDS to national partners on policy development related to DDR and human security; \n develop tools and other practical guides for the implementation of HIV\/AIDS strategies within DDR and human security frameworks; \n generate effective results\u00adoriented partnerships among different partners, civil society and community\u00adbased actors to implement a consolidated response to HIV\/AIDS within the framework of the DDR programme. \n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64362,14 +64362,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.13: DDR HIV\/AIDS Officer (P3\u2013P2)", "Heading3": "Draft generic job profile", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Core values are integrity, professionalism and respect for diversity.", "newParagraph": "organizational setting reporting relationship position located peace operation depending organizational structure mission location post incumbent may report directly chief ddr unit senior official charge ddr activity field location staff member expected seconded un specialized agency working mainstreaming activity deal hiv aid issue post conflict peace building expected work closely hiv aid adviser peacekeeping mission n accountability within limit delegated authority supervision chief ddr unit ddr hivaids officer responsible following duty n function generic may vary depending mission mandate therefore incumbent may carry function listed nn ensure full integration activity address hivaids issue phase ddr programme n provide close coordination technical support national institution ddr par ticularly office hivaids reintegration n support national party coordinating profiling documentation dissemina tion data issue relating presence role woman girl associated armed force group n document disseminate data issue relating hivaids well factor fuelling epidemic armed force group n prepare provide briefing note guidance relevant actor including national partner un agency international ngo donor others gender hiv aid context ddr n provide technical support advice hivaids national partner policy development related ddr human security n develop tool practical guide implementation hivaids strategy within ddr human security framework n generate effective result oriented partnership among different partner civil society community based actor implement consolidated response hivaids within framework ddr programme nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "nn core value integrity professionalism respect diversity", "SentID": 3575 }, { "ParagraphID": 1161, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00adtions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and re\u00ad spect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00adtions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and re\u00ad spect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64387,7 +64387,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1161, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00adtions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and re\u00ad spect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00adtions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and re\u00ad spect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64398,14 +64398,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.13: DDR HIV\/AIDS Officer (P3\u2013P2)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support.", + "Sentence": "\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity spect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support", "SentID": 3577 }, { "ParagraphID": 1161, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00adtions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and re\u00ad spect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00adtions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and re\u00ad spect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64416,14 +64416,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.13: DDR HIV\/AIDS Officer (P3\u2013P2)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness.", + "Sentence": "\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity spect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness", "SentID": 3578 }, { "ParagraphID": 1161, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00adtions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and re\u00ad spect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00adtions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and re\u00ad spect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64434,14 +64434,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.13: DDR HIV\/AIDS Officer (P3\u2013P2)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives.", + "Sentence": "\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity spect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative", "SentID": 3579 }, { "ParagraphID": 1161, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00adtions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and re\u00ad spect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00adtions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and re\u00ad spect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64452,14 +64452,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.13: DDR HIV\/AIDS Officer (P3\u2013P2)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs.", + "Sentence": "\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity spect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need", "SentID": 3580 }, { "ParagraphID": 1161, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00adtions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and re\u00ad spect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00adtions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and re\u00ad spect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64470,14 +64470,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.13: DDR HIV\/AIDS Officer (P3\u2013P2)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00adtions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials.", + "Sentence": "\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00adtions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity spect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official", "SentID": 3581 }, { "ParagraphID": 1161, - "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \\n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \\n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \\n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \\n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \\n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00adtions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and re\u00ad spect for diversity.", + "Paragraph": "Professionalism: Proven expertise in area of assignment; in\u00addepth understanding of and an ability to evaluate international political situations in that area; experience in bilateral and multilateral negotiations. \n Managing performance: Proven effective supervisory skills; ability to mentor staff and pro\u00ad vide guidance and support. \n Planning and organizing: Proven ability to establish priorities and to plan, organize, co\u00ad ordinate and monitor own work plan and provide advice and guidance to others; in\u00addepth understanding of division\u2019s strategic direction; resourcefulness. \n Judgement\/Decision-making: Demonstrated sound judgement in resolving issues\/prob\u00ad lems; ability to proactively seek and recommend sound policy initiatives. \n Creativity: Ability to actively seek to improve programmes\/services, offer new and different options to solve problems\/meet client needs. \n Communications: Well\u00addeveloped and effective communication (verbal and written) skills, including ability to prepare reports and conduct presentations by clearly formulating posi\u00adtions on issues, articulating options concisely conveying maximum necessary information, making and defending recommendations; diplomacy and tact; ability to convey difficult issues and positions to senior officials. \n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and re\u00ad spect for diversity.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64488,14 +64488,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.13: DDR HIV\/AIDS Officer (P3\u2013P2)", "Heading3": "Competencies", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and re\u00ad spect for diversity.", + "Sentence": "\n Teamwork: Proven interpersonal skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with people in a multicultural, multi\u00adethnic environment with sensitivity and re\u00ad spect for diversity.", "newParagraph": "professionalism proven expertise area assignment depth understanding ability evaluate international political situation area experience bilateral multilateral negotiation n managing performance proven effective supervisory skill ability mentor staff pro vide guidance support n planning organizing proven ability establish priority plan organize co ordinate monitor work plan provide advice guidance others depth understanding division strategic direction resourcefulness n judgementdecisionmaking demonstrated sound judgement resolving issuesprob lem ability proactively seek recommend sound policy initiative n creativity ability actively seek improve programmesservices offer new different option solve problemsmeet client need n communication well developed effective communication verbal written skill including ability prepare report conduct presentation clearly formulating posi tions issue articulating option concisely conveying maximum necessary information making defending recommendation diplomacy tact ability convey difficult issue position senior official n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity spect diversity", "ProcessedSent": "n teamwork proven interpersonal skill ability establish maintain effective working relation people multicultural multi ethnic environment sensitivity spect diversity", "SentID": 3582 }, { "ParagraphID": 1162, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on gender issues in post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on gender issues in post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64513,7 +64513,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1162, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on gender issues in post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on gender issues in post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64531,7 +64531,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1162, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on gender issues in post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on gender issues in post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64542,14 +64542,14 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.13: DDR HIV\/AIDS Officer (P3\u2013P2)", "Heading3": "Qualifications", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on gender issues in post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues.", + "Sentence": "\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on gender issues in post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues.", "newParagraph": "education advanced university degree social science management economics business administration international development relevant field relevant combination academic qualification experience related area may accepted lieu advanced degree n work experience minimum five year substantial experience working gender issue post conflict crisis economic recovery issue n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "ProcessedSent": "n work experience minimum five year substantial experience working gender issue post conflict crisis economic recovery issue", "SentID": 3585 }, { "ParagraphID": 1162, - "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \\n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on gender issues in post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. \\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Paragraph": "Education: Advanced university degree in social sciences, management, economics, business administration, international development or other relevant fields. A relevant combination of academic qualifications and experience in related areas may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree. \n Work experience: Minimum of five years of substantial experience working on gender issues in post\u00adconflict, crisis and economic recovery issues. \n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64560,7 +64560,7 @@ "Heading2": "Annex C.13: DDR HIV\/AIDS Officer (P3\u2013P2)", "Heading3": "Qualifications", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", + "Sentence": "\n Languages: Fluency in oral and written English and\/or French, depending on the working language of the mission; knowledge of a second UN official language may be a requirement for a specific post.", "newParagraph": "education advanced university degree social science management economics business administration international development relevant field relevant combination academic qualification experience related area may accepted lieu advanced degree n work experience minimum five year substantial experience working gender issue post conflict crisis economic recovery issue n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "ProcessedSent": "n language fluency oral written english andor french depending working language mission knowledge second un official language may requirement specific post", "SentID": 3586 @@ -64747,7 +64747,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1167, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64765,7 +64765,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1167, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64776,14 +64776,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard.", + "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard.", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "ProcessedSent": "use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard", "SentID": 3598 }, { "ParagraphID": 1167, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64794,14 +64794,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications.", + "Sentence": "\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications.", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "ProcessedSent": "n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification", "SentID": 3599 }, { "ParagraphID": 1167, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64812,14 +64812,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Sentence": "\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "ProcessedSent": "n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "SentID": 3600 }, { "ParagraphID": 1168, - "Paragraph": "Traditionally, M&E in DDR programmes has focused on assessing inputs and implemen\u00ad tation processes. Today, the focus is on assessing how various factors contribute to or detract from the achievement of the proposed outcomes and programme objectives, and measur\u00ad ing the effectiveness of outputs, partnerships, policy advice and dialogue, advocacy, and brokering\/coordination. The main objectives of results\u00adoriented M&E are to: \\n increase organizational and development learning; \\n ensure informed decision\u00admaking; \\n support genuine accountability and ensure quality control; \\n contribute to the further development of best practice and policy; \\n build country capacities, especially in M&E.", + "Paragraph": "Traditionally, M&E in DDR programmes has focused on assessing inputs and implemen\u00ad tation processes. Today, the focus is on assessing how various factors contribute to or detract from the achievement of the proposed outcomes and programme objectives, and measur\u00ad ing the effectiveness of outputs, partnerships, policy advice and dialogue, advocacy, and brokering\/coordination. The main objectives of results\u00adoriented M&E are to: \n increase organizational and development learning; \n ensure informed decision\u00admaking; \n support genuine accountability and ensure quality control; \n contribute to the further development of best practice and policy; \n build country capacities, especially in M&E.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64837,7 +64837,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1168, - "Paragraph": "Traditionally, M&E in DDR programmes has focused on assessing inputs and implemen\u00ad tation processes. Today, the focus is on assessing how various factors contribute to or detract from the achievement of the proposed outcomes and programme objectives, and measur\u00ad ing the effectiveness of outputs, partnerships, policy advice and dialogue, advocacy, and brokering\/coordination. The main objectives of results\u00adoriented M&E are to: \\n increase organizational and development learning; \\n ensure informed decision\u00admaking; \\n support genuine accountability and ensure quality control; \\n contribute to the further development of best practice and policy; \\n build country capacities, especially in M&E.", + "Paragraph": "Traditionally, M&E in DDR programmes has focused on assessing inputs and implemen\u00ad tation processes. Today, the focus is on assessing how various factors contribute to or detract from the achievement of the proposed outcomes and programme objectives, and measur\u00ad ing the effectiveness of outputs, partnerships, policy advice and dialogue, advocacy, and brokering\/coordination. The main objectives of results\u00adoriented M&E are to: \n increase organizational and development learning; \n ensure informed decision\u00admaking; \n support genuine accountability and ensure quality control; \n contribute to the further development of best practice and policy; \n build country capacities, especially in M&E.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64855,7 +64855,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1168, - "Paragraph": "Traditionally, M&E in DDR programmes has focused on assessing inputs and implemen\u00ad tation processes. Today, the focus is on assessing how various factors contribute to or detract from the achievement of the proposed outcomes and programme objectives, and measur\u00ad ing the effectiveness of outputs, partnerships, policy advice and dialogue, advocacy, and brokering\/coordination. The main objectives of results\u00adoriented M&E are to: \\n increase organizational and development learning; \\n ensure informed decision\u00admaking; \\n support genuine accountability and ensure quality control; \\n contribute to the further development of best practice and policy; \\n build country capacities, especially in M&E.", + "Paragraph": "Traditionally, M&E in DDR programmes has focused on assessing inputs and implemen\u00ad tation processes. Today, the focus is on assessing how various factors contribute to or detract from the achievement of the proposed outcomes and programme objectives, and measur\u00ad ing the effectiveness of outputs, partnerships, policy advice and dialogue, advocacy, and brokering\/coordination. The main objectives of results\u00adoriented M&E are to: \n increase organizational and development learning; \n ensure informed decision\u00admaking; \n support genuine accountability and ensure quality control; \n contribute to the further development of best practice and policy; \n build country capacities, especially in M&E.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64866,14 +64866,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The main objectives of results\u00adoriented M&E are to: \\n increase organizational and development learning; \\n ensure informed decision\u00admaking; \\n support genuine accountability and ensure quality control; \\n contribute to the further development of best practice and policy; \\n build country capacities, especially in M&E.", + "Sentence": "The main objectives of results\u00adoriented M&E are to: \n increase organizational and development learning; \n ensure informed decision\u00admaking; \n support genuine accountability and ensure quality control; \n contribute to the further development of best practice and policy; \n build country capacities, especially in M&E.", "newParagraph": "traditionally ddr programme focused assessing input implemen tation process today focus assessing various factor contribute detract achievement proposed outcome programme objective measur ing effectiveness output partnership policy advice dialogue advocacy brokeringcoordination main objective result oriented n increase organizational development learning n ensure informed decision making n support genuine accountability ensure quality control n contribute development best practice policy n build country capacity especially", "ProcessedSent": "main objective result oriented n increase organizational development learning n ensure informed decision making n support genuine accountability ensure quality control n contribute development best practice policy n build country capacity especially", "SentID": 3603 }, { "ParagraphID": 1169, - "Paragraph": "In order to enable programme managers to improve strategies, programmes and other activities, M&E aims to generate information in several key areas to allow the measure\u00ad ment of: \\n programme performance, which indicates whether programme implementation is pro\u00ad ceeding in accordance with the programme plan and budget; \\n programme effectiveness, which answers such questions as whether and to what extent the programme has achieved its objectives, and on what external conditions it depends; \\n programme efficiency, which determines whether programme outputs and outcomes were produced in the most economical way, i.e., by maximizing outputs and\/or mini\u00ad mizing inputs.", + "Paragraph": "In order to enable programme managers to improve strategies, programmes and other activities, M&E aims to generate information in several key areas to allow the measure\u00ad ment of: \n programme performance, which indicates whether programme implementation is pro\u00ad ceeding in accordance with the programme plan and budget; \n programme effectiveness, which answers such questions as whether and to what extent the programme has achieved its objectives, and on what external conditions it depends; \n programme efficiency, which determines whether programme outputs and outcomes were produced in the most economical way, i.e., by maximizing outputs and\/or mini\u00ad mizing inputs.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64884,14 +64884,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "In order to enable programme managers to improve strategies, programmes and other activities, M&E aims to generate information in several key areas to allow the measure\u00ad ment of: \\n programme performance, which indicates whether programme implementation is pro\u00ad ceeding in accordance with the programme plan and budget; \\n programme effectiveness, which answers such questions as whether and to what extent the programme has achieved its objectives, and on what external conditions it depends; \\n programme efficiency, which determines whether programme outputs and outcomes were produced in the most economical way, i.e., by maximizing outputs and\/or mini\u00ad mizing inputs.", + "Sentence": "In order to enable programme managers to improve strategies, programmes and other activities, M&E aims to generate information in several key areas to allow the measure\u00ad ment of: \n programme performance, which indicates whether programme implementation is pro\u00ad ceeding in accordance with the programme plan and budget; \n programme effectiveness, which answers such questions as whether and to what extent the programme has achieved its objectives, and on what external conditions it depends; \n programme efficiency, which determines whether programme outputs and outcomes were produced in the most economical way, i.e., by maximizing outputs and\/or mini\u00ad mizing inputs.", "newParagraph": "order enable programme manager improve strategy programme activity aim generate information several key area allow measure ment n programme performance indicates whether programme implementation pro ceeding accordance programme plan budget n programme effectiveness answer question whether extent programme achieved objective external condition depends n programme efficiency determines whether programme output outcome produced economical way ie maximizing output andor mini mizing input", "ProcessedSent": "order enable programme manager improve strategy programme activity aim generate information several key area allow measure ment n programme performance indicates whether programme implementation pro ceeding accordance programme plan budget n programme effectiveness answer question whether extent programme achieved objective external condition depends n programme efficiency determines whether programme output outcome produced economical way ie maximizing output andor mini mizing input", "SentID": 3604 }, { "ParagraphID": 1170, - "Paragraph": "When developing an M&E strategy as part of the overall process of programme development, several important principles are relevant for DDR: \\n Planners shall ensure that baseline data (data that describes the problem or situation before the intervention and which can be used to later provide a point of comparison) and relevant performance indicators are built into the programme development process itself. Baseline data are best collected within the framework of the comprehensive assess\u00ad ments that are carried out before the programme is developed, while performance indicators are defined in relation to both baseline data and the outputs, activities and outcomes that are expected; \\n The development of an M&E strategy and framework for a DDR programme is essen\u00ad tial in order to develop a systematic approach for collecting, processing, and using data and results; \\n M&E should use information and data from the regular information collection mech\u00ad anisms and reports, as well as periodic measurement of key indicators; \\n Monitoring and data collection should be an integral component of the information management system for the DDR process, and as such should be made widely available to key DDR staff and stakeholders for consultation; \\n M&E plans specifying the frequency and type of reviews and evaluations should be a part of the overall DDR work planning process; \\n A distinction should be made between the evaluation of UN support for national DDR (i.e., the UN DDR programme itself) and the overall national DDR effort, given the focus on measuring the overall effectiveness and impact of UN inputs on DDR, as opposed to the overall effectiveness and impact of DDR at the national level; \\n All integrated DDR sections should make provision for the necessary staff, equipment and other requirements to ensure that M&E is adequately dealt with and carried out, independently of other DDR activities, using resources that are specifically allocated to this purpose.", + "Paragraph": "When developing an M&E strategy as part of the overall process of programme development, several important principles are relevant for DDR: \n Planners shall ensure that baseline data (data that describes the problem or situation before the intervention and which can be used to later provide a point of comparison) and relevant performance indicators are built into the programme development process itself. Baseline data are best collected within the framework of the comprehensive assess\u00ad ments that are carried out before the programme is developed, while performance indicators are defined in relation to both baseline data and the outputs, activities and outcomes that are expected; \n The development of an M&E strategy and framework for a DDR programme is essen\u00ad tial in order to develop a systematic approach for collecting, processing, and using data and results; \n M&E should use information and data from the regular information collection mech\u00ad anisms and reports, as well as periodic measurement of key indicators; \n Monitoring and data collection should be an integral component of the information management system for the DDR process, and as such should be made widely available to key DDR staff and stakeholders for consultation; \n M&E plans specifying the frequency and type of reviews and evaluations should be a part of the overall DDR work planning process; \n A distinction should be made between the evaluation of UN support for national DDR (i.e., the UN DDR programme itself) and the overall national DDR effort, given the focus on measuring the overall effectiveness and impact of UN inputs on DDR, as opposed to the overall effectiveness and impact of DDR at the national level; \n All integrated DDR sections should make provision for the necessary staff, equipment and other requirements to ensure that M&E is adequately dealt with and carried out, independently of other DDR activities, using resources that are specifically allocated to this purpose.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64902,14 +64902,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "When developing an M&E strategy as part of the overall process of programme development, several important principles are relevant for DDR: \\n Planners shall ensure that baseline data (data that describes the problem or situation before the intervention and which can be used to later provide a point of comparison) and relevant performance indicators are built into the programme development process itself.", + "Sentence": "When developing an M&E strategy as part of the overall process of programme development, several important principles are relevant for DDR: \n Planners shall ensure that baseline data (data that describes the problem or situation before the intervention and which can be used to later provide a point of comparison) and relevant performance indicators are built into the programme development process itself.", "newParagraph": "developing strategy part overall process programme development several important principle relevant ddr n planner shall ensure baseline data data describes problem situation intervention used later provide point comparison relevant performance indicator built programme development process baseline data best collected within framework comprehensive ass ments carried programme developed performance indicator defined relation baseline data output activity outcome expected n development strategy framework ddr programme essen tial order develop systematic approach collecting processing using data result n use information data regular information collection mech anisms report well periodic measurement key indicator n monitoring data collection integral component information management system ddr process made widely available key ddr staff stakeholder consultation n plan specifying frequency type review evaluation part overall ddr work planning process n distinction made evaluation un support national ddr ie un ddr programme overall national ddr effort given focus measuring overall effectiveness impact un input ddr opposed overall effectiveness impact ddr national level n integrated ddr section make provision necessary staff equipment requirement ensure adequately dealt carried independently ddr activity using resource specifically allocated purpose", "ProcessedSent": "developing strategy part overall process programme development several important principle relevant ddr n planner shall ensure baseline data data describes problem situation intervention used later provide point comparison relevant performance indicator built programme development process", "SentID": 3605 }, { "ParagraphID": 1170, - "Paragraph": "When developing an M&E strategy as part of the overall process of programme development, several important principles are relevant for DDR: \\n Planners shall ensure that baseline data (data that describes the problem or situation before the intervention and which can be used to later provide a point of comparison) and relevant performance indicators are built into the programme development process itself. Baseline data are best collected within the framework of the comprehensive assess\u00ad ments that are carried out before the programme is developed, while performance indicators are defined in relation to both baseline data and the outputs, activities and outcomes that are expected; \\n The development of an M&E strategy and framework for a DDR programme is essen\u00ad tial in order to develop a systematic approach for collecting, processing, and using data and results; \\n M&E should use information and data from the regular information collection mech\u00ad anisms and reports, as well as periodic measurement of key indicators; \\n Monitoring and data collection should be an integral component of the information management system for the DDR process, and as such should be made widely available to key DDR staff and stakeholders for consultation; \\n M&E plans specifying the frequency and type of reviews and evaluations should be a part of the overall DDR work planning process; \\n A distinction should be made between the evaluation of UN support for national DDR (i.e., the UN DDR programme itself) and the overall national DDR effort, given the focus on measuring the overall effectiveness and impact of UN inputs on DDR, as opposed to the overall effectiveness and impact of DDR at the national level; \\n All integrated DDR sections should make provision for the necessary staff, equipment and other requirements to ensure that M&E is adequately dealt with and carried out, independently of other DDR activities, using resources that are specifically allocated to this purpose.", + "Paragraph": "When developing an M&E strategy as part of the overall process of programme development, several important principles are relevant for DDR: \n Planners shall ensure that baseline data (data that describes the problem or situation before the intervention and which can be used to later provide a point of comparison) and relevant performance indicators are built into the programme development process itself. Baseline data are best collected within the framework of the comprehensive assess\u00ad ments that are carried out before the programme is developed, while performance indicators are defined in relation to both baseline data and the outputs, activities and outcomes that are expected; \n The development of an M&E strategy and framework for a DDR programme is essen\u00ad tial in order to develop a systematic approach for collecting, processing, and using data and results; \n M&E should use information and data from the regular information collection mech\u00ad anisms and reports, as well as periodic measurement of key indicators; \n Monitoring and data collection should be an integral component of the information management system for the DDR process, and as such should be made widely available to key DDR staff and stakeholders for consultation; \n M&E plans specifying the frequency and type of reviews and evaluations should be a part of the overall DDR work planning process; \n A distinction should be made between the evaluation of UN support for national DDR (i.e., the UN DDR programme itself) and the overall national DDR effort, given the focus on measuring the overall effectiveness and impact of UN inputs on DDR, as opposed to the overall effectiveness and impact of DDR at the national level; \n All integrated DDR sections should make provision for the necessary staff, equipment and other requirements to ensure that M&E is adequately dealt with and carried out, independently of other DDR activities, using resources that are specifically allocated to this purpose.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64920,7 +64920,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Baseline data are best collected within the framework of the comprehensive assess\u00ad ments that are carried out before the programme is developed, while performance indicators are defined in relation to both baseline data and the outputs, activities and outcomes that are expected; \\n The development of an M&E strategy and framework for a DDR programme is essen\u00ad tial in order to develop a systematic approach for collecting, processing, and using data and results; \\n M&E should use information and data from the regular information collection mech\u00ad anisms and reports, as well as periodic measurement of key indicators; \\n Monitoring and data collection should be an integral component of the information management system for the DDR process, and as such should be made widely available to key DDR staff and stakeholders for consultation; \\n M&E plans specifying the frequency and type of reviews and evaluations should be a part of the overall DDR work planning process; \\n A distinction should be made between the evaluation of UN support for national DDR (i.e., the UN DDR programme itself) and the overall national DDR effort, given the focus on measuring the overall effectiveness and impact of UN inputs on DDR, as opposed to the overall effectiveness and impact of DDR at the national level; \\n All integrated DDR sections should make provision for the necessary staff, equipment and other requirements to ensure that M&E is adequately dealt with and carried out, independently of other DDR activities, using resources that are specifically allocated to this purpose.", + "Sentence": "Baseline data are best collected within the framework of the comprehensive assess\u00ad ments that are carried out before the programme is developed, while performance indicators are defined in relation to both baseline data and the outputs, activities and outcomes that are expected; \n The development of an M&E strategy and framework for a DDR programme is essen\u00ad tial in order to develop a systematic approach for collecting, processing, and using data and results; \n M&E should use information and data from the regular information collection mech\u00ad anisms and reports, as well as periodic measurement of key indicators; \n Monitoring and data collection should be an integral component of the information management system for the DDR process, and as such should be made widely available to key DDR staff and stakeholders for consultation; \n M&E plans specifying the frequency and type of reviews and evaluations should be a part of the overall DDR work planning process; \n A distinction should be made between the evaluation of UN support for national DDR (i.e., the UN DDR programme itself) and the overall national DDR effort, given the focus on measuring the overall effectiveness and impact of UN inputs on DDR, as opposed to the overall effectiveness and impact of DDR at the national level; \n All integrated DDR sections should make provision for the necessary staff, equipment and other requirements to ensure that M&E is adequately dealt with and carried out, independently of other DDR activities, using resources that are specifically allocated to this purpose.", "newParagraph": "developing strategy part overall process programme development several important principle relevant ddr n planner shall ensure baseline data data describes problem situation intervention used later provide point comparison relevant performance indicator built programme development process baseline data best collected within framework comprehensive ass ments carried programme developed performance indicator defined relation baseline data output activity outcome expected n development strategy framework ddr programme essen tial order develop systematic approach collecting processing using data result n use information data regular information collection mech anisms report well periodic measurement key indicator n monitoring data collection integral component information management system ddr process made widely available key ddr staff stakeholder consultation n plan specifying frequency type review evaluation part overall ddr work planning process n distinction made evaluation un support national ddr ie un ddr programme overall national ddr effort given focus measuring overall effectiveness impact un input ddr opposed overall effectiveness impact ddr national level n integrated ddr section make provision necessary staff equipment requirement ensure adequately dealt carried independently ddr activity using resource specifically allocated purpose", "ProcessedSent": "baseline data best collected within framework comprehensive ass ments carried programme developed performance indicator defined relation baseline data output activity outcome expected n development strategy framework ddr programme essen tial order develop systematic approach collecting processing using data result n use information data regular information collection mech anisms report well periodic measurement key indicator n monitoring data collection integral component information management system ddr process made widely available key ddr staff stakeholder consultation n plan specifying frequency type review evaluation part overall ddr work planning process n distinction made evaluation un support national ddr ie un ddr programme overall national ddr effort given focus measuring overall effectiveness impact un input ddr opposed overall effectiveness impact ddr national level n integrated ddr section make provision necessary staff equipment requirement ensure adequately dealt carried independently ddr activity using resource specifically allocated purpose", "SentID": 3606 @@ -64981,7 +64981,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1172, - "Paragraph": "The definition of a comprehensive strat\u00ad egy and framework for DDR is a vital part of the overall programme implementation process. Although strategies will differ a great deal in different contexts, key guiding questions that should be asked when designing an effec\u00ad tive framework for M&E include: \\n What objectives should an M&E strategy and framework measure? \\n What elements should go into a work plan for reporting, monitoring and evaluating performance and results? \\n What key indicators are important in such a framework? \\n What information management systems are necessary to ensure timely capture of appro\u00ad priate data and information? \\n How can the results of M&E be integrated into programme implementation and used to control quality and adapt processes?", + "Paragraph": "The definition of a comprehensive strat\u00ad egy and framework for DDR is a vital part of the overall programme implementation process. Although strategies will differ a great deal in different contexts, key guiding questions that should be asked when designing an effec\u00ad tive framework for M&E include: \n What objectives should an M&E strategy and framework measure? \n What elements should go into a work plan for reporting, monitoring and evaluating performance and results? \n What key indicators are important in such a framework? \n What information management systems are necessary to ensure timely capture of appro\u00ad priate data and information? \n How can the results of M&E be integrated into programme implementation and used to control quality and adapt processes?", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -64999,7 +64999,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1172, - "Paragraph": "The definition of a comprehensive strat\u00ad egy and framework for DDR is a vital part of the overall programme implementation process. Although strategies will differ a great deal in different contexts, key guiding questions that should be asked when designing an effec\u00ad tive framework for M&E include: \\n What objectives should an M&E strategy and framework measure? \\n What elements should go into a work plan for reporting, monitoring and evaluating performance and results? \\n What key indicators are important in such a framework? \\n What information management systems are necessary to ensure timely capture of appro\u00ad priate data and information? \\n How can the results of M&E be integrated into programme implementation and used to control quality and adapt processes?", + "Paragraph": "The definition of a comprehensive strat\u00ad egy and framework for DDR is a vital part of the overall programme implementation process. Although strategies will differ a great deal in different contexts, key guiding questions that should be asked when designing an effec\u00ad tive framework for M&E include: \n What objectives should an M&E strategy and framework measure? \n What elements should go into a work plan for reporting, monitoring and evaluating performance and results? \n What key indicators are important in such a framework? \n What information management systems are necessary to ensure timely capture of appro\u00ad priate data and information? \n How can the results of M&E be integrated into programme implementation and used to control quality and adapt processes?", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -65010,14 +65010,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Although strategies will differ a great deal in different contexts, key guiding questions that should be asked when designing an effec\u00ad tive framework for M&E include: \\n What objectives should an M&E strategy and framework measure?", + "Sentence": "Although strategies will differ a great deal in different contexts, key guiding questions that should be asked when designing an effec\u00ad tive framework for M&E include: \n What objectives should an M&E strategy and framework measure?", "newParagraph": "definition comprehensive strat egy framework ddr vital part overall programme implementation process although strategy differ great deal different context key guiding question asked designing effec tive framework include n objective strategy framework measure n element go work plan reporting monitoring evaluating performance result n key indicator important framework n information management system necessary ensure timely capture appro priate data information n result integrated programme implementation used control quality adapt process", "ProcessedSent": "although strategy differ great deal different context key guiding question asked designing effec tive framework include n objective strategy framework measure", "SentID": 3611 }, { "ParagraphID": 1172, - "Paragraph": "The definition of a comprehensive strat\u00ad egy and framework for DDR is a vital part of the overall programme implementation process. Although strategies will differ a great deal in different contexts, key guiding questions that should be asked when designing an effec\u00ad tive framework for M&E include: \\n What objectives should an M&E strategy and framework measure? \\n What elements should go into a work plan for reporting, monitoring and evaluating performance and results? \\n What key indicators are important in such a framework? \\n What information management systems are necessary to ensure timely capture of appro\u00ad priate data and information? \\n How can the results of M&E be integrated into programme implementation and used to control quality and adapt processes?", + "Paragraph": "The definition of a comprehensive strat\u00ad egy and framework for DDR is a vital part of the overall programme implementation process. Although strategies will differ a great deal in different contexts, key guiding questions that should be asked when designing an effec\u00ad tive framework for M&E include: \n What objectives should an M&E strategy and framework measure? \n What elements should go into a work plan for reporting, monitoring and evaluating performance and results? \n What key indicators are important in such a framework? \n What information management systems are necessary to ensure timely capture of appro\u00ad priate data and information? \n How can the results of M&E be integrated into programme implementation and used to control quality and adapt processes?", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -65028,14 +65028,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What elements should go into a work plan for reporting, monitoring and evaluating performance and results?", + "Sentence": "\n What elements should go into a work plan for reporting, monitoring and evaluating performance and results?", "newParagraph": "definition comprehensive strat egy framework ddr vital part overall programme implementation process although strategy differ great deal different context key guiding question asked designing effec tive framework include n objective strategy framework measure n element go work plan reporting monitoring evaluating performance result n key indicator important framework n information management system necessary ensure timely capture appro priate data information n result integrated programme implementation used control quality adapt process", "ProcessedSent": "n element go work plan reporting monitoring evaluating performance result", "SentID": 3612 }, { "ParagraphID": 1172, - "Paragraph": "The definition of a comprehensive strat\u00ad egy and framework for DDR is a vital part of the overall programme implementation process. Although strategies will differ a great deal in different contexts, key guiding questions that should be asked when designing an effec\u00ad tive framework for M&E include: \\n What objectives should an M&E strategy and framework measure? \\n What elements should go into a work plan for reporting, monitoring and evaluating performance and results? \\n What key indicators are important in such a framework? \\n What information management systems are necessary to ensure timely capture of appro\u00ad priate data and information? \\n How can the results of M&E be integrated into programme implementation and used to control quality and adapt processes?", + "Paragraph": "The definition of a comprehensive strat\u00ad egy and framework for DDR is a vital part of the overall programme implementation process. Although strategies will differ a great deal in different contexts, key guiding questions that should be asked when designing an effec\u00ad tive framework for M&E include: \n What objectives should an M&E strategy and framework measure? \n What elements should go into a work plan for reporting, monitoring and evaluating performance and results? \n What key indicators are important in such a framework? \n What information management systems are necessary to ensure timely capture of appro\u00ad priate data and information? \n How can the results of M&E be integrated into programme implementation and used to control quality and adapt processes?", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -65046,14 +65046,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What key indicators are important in such a framework?", + "Sentence": "\n What key indicators are important in such a framework?", "newParagraph": "definition comprehensive strat egy framework ddr vital part overall programme implementation process although strategy differ great deal different context key guiding question asked designing effec tive framework include n objective strategy framework measure n element go work plan reporting monitoring evaluating performance result n key indicator important framework n information management system necessary ensure timely capture appro priate data information n result integrated programme implementation used control quality adapt process", "ProcessedSent": "n key indicator important framework", "SentID": 3613 }, { "ParagraphID": 1172, - "Paragraph": "The definition of a comprehensive strat\u00ad egy and framework for DDR is a vital part of the overall programme implementation process. Although strategies will differ a great deal in different contexts, key guiding questions that should be asked when designing an effec\u00ad tive framework for M&E include: \\n What objectives should an M&E strategy and framework measure? \\n What elements should go into a work plan for reporting, monitoring and evaluating performance and results? \\n What key indicators are important in such a framework? \\n What information management systems are necessary to ensure timely capture of appro\u00ad priate data and information? \\n How can the results of M&E be integrated into programme implementation and used to control quality and adapt processes?", + "Paragraph": "The definition of a comprehensive strat\u00ad egy and framework for DDR is a vital part of the overall programme implementation process. Although strategies will differ a great deal in different contexts, key guiding questions that should be asked when designing an effec\u00ad tive framework for M&E include: \n What objectives should an M&E strategy and framework measure? \n What elements should go into a work plan for reporting, monitoring and evaluating performance and results? \n What key indicators are important in such a framework? \n What information management systems are necessary to ensure timely capture of appro\u00ad priate data and information? \n How can the results of M&E be integrated into programme implementation and used to control quality and adapt processes?", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -65064,14 +65064,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What information management systems are necessary to ensure timely capture of appro\u00ad priate data and information?", + "Sentence": "\n What information management systems are necessary to ensure timely capture of appro\u00ad priate data and information?", "newParagraph": "definition comprehensive strat egy framework ddr vital part overall programme implementation process although strategy differ great deal different context key guiding question asked designing effec tive framework include n objective strategy framework measure n element go work plan reporting monitoring evaluating performance result n key indicator important framework n information management system necessary ensure timely capture appro priate data information n result integrated programme implementation used control quality adapt process", "ProcessedSent": "n information management system necessary ensure timely capture appro priate data information", "SentID": 3614 }, { "ParagraphID": 1172, - "Paragraph": "The definition of a comprehensive strat\u00ad egy and framework for DDR is a vital part of the overall programme implementation process. Although strategies will differ a great deal in different contexts, key guiding questions that should be asked when designing an effec\u00ad tive framework for M&E include: \\n What objectives should an M&E strategy and framework measure? \\n What elements should go into a work plan for reporting, monitoring and evaluating performance and results? \\n What key indicators are important in such a framework? \\n What information management systems are necessary to ensure timely capture of appro\u00ad priate data and information? \\n How can the results of M&E be integrated into programme implementation and used to control quality and adapt processes?", + "Paragraph": "The definition of a comprehensive strat\u00ad egy and framework for DDR is a vital part of the overall programme implementation process. Although strategies will differ a great deal in different contexts, key guiding questions that should be asked when designing an effec\u00ad tive framework for M&E include: \n What objectives should an M&E strategy and framework measure? \n What elements should go into a work plan for reporting, monitoring and evaluating performance and results? \n What key indicators are important in such a framework? \n What information management systems are necessary to ensure timely capture of appro\u00ad priate data and information? \n How can the results of M&E be integrated into programme implementation and used to control quality and adapt processes?", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -65082,7 +65082,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n How can the results of M&E be integrated into programme implementation and used to control quality and adapt processes?", + "Sentence": "\n How can the results of M&E be integrated into programme implementation and used to control quality and adapt processes?", "newParagraph": "definition comprehensive strat egy framework ddr vital part overall programme implementation process although strategy differ great deal different context key guiding question asked designing effec tive framework include n objective strategy framework measure n element go work plan reporting monitoring evaluating performance result n key indicator important framework n information management system necessary ensure timely capture appro priate data information n result integrated programme implementation used control quality adapt process", "ProcessedSent": "n result integrated programme implementation used control quality adapt process", "SentID": 3615 @@ -65179,7 +65179,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1175, - "Paragraph": "For the purposes of integrated DDR, M&E can be divided into two levels related to the results\u00adbased framework: \\n measurement of the performance of DDR programmes in achieving outcomes and outputs throughout its various components generated by a set of activities: disarma\u00ad ment (e.g., number of weapons collected and destroyed); demobilization (number of ex\u00adcombatants screened, processed and assisted); and reintegration (number of ex\u00ad combatants reintegrated and communities assisted); \\n measurement of the outcomes of DDR programmes in contributing towards an overall goal. This can include reductions in levels of violence in society, increased stability and security, and consolidation of peace processes. It is difficult, however, to determine the impact of DDR on broader society without isolating it from other processes and initiatives (e.g., peace\u00adbuilding, security sector reform [SSR]) that also have an impact.", + "Paragraph": "For the purposes of integrated DDR, M&E can be divided into two levels related to the results\u00adbased framework: \n measurement of the performance of DDR programmes in achieving outcomes and outputs throughout its various components generated by a set of activities: disarma\u00ad ment (e.g., number of weapons collected and destroyed); demobilization (number of ex\u00adcombatants screened, processed and assisted); and reintegration (number of ex\u00ad combatants reintegrated and communities assisted); \n measurement of the outcomes of DDR programmes in contributing towards an overall goal. This can include reductions in levels of violence in society, increased stability and security, and consolidation of peace processes. It is difficult, however, to determine the impact of DDR on broader society without isolating it from other processes and initiatives (e.g., peace\u00adbuilding, security sector reform [SSR]) that also have an impact.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -65190,14 +65190,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1. M&E and results-based management", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "For the purposes of integrated DDR, M&E can be divided into two levels related to the results\u00adbased framework: \\n measurement of the performance of DDR programmes in achieving outcomes and outputs throughout its various components generated by a set of activities: disarma\u00ad ment (e.g., number of weapons collected and destroyed); demobilization (number of ex\u00adcombatants screened, processed and assisted); and reintegration (number of ex\u00ad combatants reintegrated and communities assisted); \\n measurement of the outcomes of DDR programmes in contributing towards an overall goal.", + "Sentence": "For the purposes of integrated DDR, M&E can be divided into two levels related to the results\u00adbased framework: \n measurement of the performance of DDR programmes in achieving outcomes and outputs throughout its various components generated by a set of activities: disarma\u00ad ment (e.g., number of weapons collected and destroyed); demobilization (number of ex\u00adcombatants screened, processed and assisted); and reintegration (number of ex\u00ad combatants reintegrated and communities assisted); \n measurement of the outcomes of DDR programmes in contributing towards an overall goal.", "newParagraph": "purpose integrated ddr divided two level related result based framework n measurement performance ddr programme achieving outcome output throughout various component generated set activity disarma ment eg number weapon collected destroyed demobilization number ex combatant screened processed assisted reintegration number ex combatant reintegrated community assisted n measurement outcome ddr programme contributing towards overall goal include reduction level violence society increased stability security consolidation peace process difficult however determine impact ddr broader society without isolating process initiative eg peace building security sector reform ssr also impact", "ProcessedSent": "purpose integrated ddr divided two level related result based framework n measurement performance ddr programme achieving outcome output throughout various component generated set activity disarma ment eg number weapon collected destroyed demobilization number ex combatant screened processed assisted reintegration number ex combatant reintegrated community assisted n measurement outcome ddr programme contributing towards overall goal", "SentID": 3621 }, { "ParagraphID": 1175, - "Paragraph": "For the purposes of integrated DDR, M&E can be divided into two levels related to the results\u00adbased framework: \\n measurement of the performance of DDR programmes in achieving outcomes and outputs throughout its various components generated by a set of activities: disarma\u00ad ment (e.g., number of weapons collected and destroyed); demobilization (number of ex\u00adcombatants screened, processed and assisted); and reintegration (number of ex\u00ad combatants reintegrated and communities assisted); \\n measurement of the outcomes of DDR programmes in contributing towards an overall goal. This can include reductions in levels of violence in society, increased stability and security, and consolidation of peace processes. It is difficult, however, to determine the impact of DDR on broader society without isolating it from other processes and initiatives (e.g., peace\u00adbuilding, security sector reform [SSR]) that also have an impact.", + "Paragraph": "For the purposes of integrated DDR, M&E can be divided into two levels related to the results\u00adbased framework: \n measurement of the performance of DDR programmes in achieving outcomes and outputs throughout its various components generated by a set of activities: disarma\u00ad ment (e.g., number of weapons collected and destroyed); demobilization (number of ex\u00adcombatants screened, processed and assisted); and reintegration (number of ex\u00ad combatants reintegrated and communities assisted); \n measurement of the outcomes of DDR programmes in contributing towards an overall goal. This can include reductions in levels of violence in society, increased stability and security, and consolidation of peace processes. It is difficult, however, to determine the impact of DDR on broader society without isolating it from other processes and initiatives (e.g., peace\u00adbuilding, security sector reform [SSR]) that also have an impact.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -65215,7 +65215,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1175, - "Paragraph": "For the purposes of integrated DDR, M&E can be divided into two levels related to the results\u00adbased framework: \\n measurement of the performance of DDR programmes in achieving outcomes and outputs throughout its various components generated by a set of activities: disarma\u00ad ment (e.g., number of weapons collected and destroyed); demobilization (number of ex\u00adcombatants screened, processed and assisted); and reintegration (number of ex\u00ad combatants reintegrated and communities assisted); \\n measurement of the outcomes of DDR programmes in contributing towards an overall goal. This can include reductions in levels of violence in society, increased stability and security, and consolidation of peace processes. It is difficult, however, to determine the impact of DDR on broader society without isolating it from other processes and initiatives (e.g., peace\u00adbuilding, security sector reform [SSR]) that also have an impact.", + "Paragraph": "For the purposes of integrated DDR, M&E can be divided into two levels related to the results\u00adbased framework: \n measurement of the performance of DDR programmes in achieving outcomes and outputs throughout its various components generated by a set of activities: disarma\u00ad ment (e.g., number of weapons collected and destroyed); demobilization (number of ex\u00adcombatants screened, processed and assisted); and reintegration (number of ex\u00ad combatants reintegrated and communities assisted); \n measurement of the outcomes of DDR programmes in contributing towards an overall goal. This can include reductions in levels of violence in society, increased stability and security, and consolidation of peace processes. It is difficult, however, to determine the impact of DDR on broader society without isolating it from other processes and initiatives (e.g., peace\u00adbuilding, security sector reform [SSR]) that also have an impact.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -65233,7 +65233,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1176, - "Paragraph": "Provisions for M&E, and in particular the key elements of a strategy and framework, should be integrated into the programme development and implementation process from the beginning. This should occur in the following ways: \\n Performance indicators relevant for M&E should be identified, together with the devel\u00ad opment of a baseline study and indicators framework for the comprehensive assessment, as well as the results framework for the DDR programme itself (see IDDRS 3.20 on DDR Programme Design for advice on the development of a results framework); \\n Requirements for establishing and implementing an M&E system should be taken into consideration during the identification of programme requirements, including dedicated staff, material and information management systems; \\n Key aspects of the M&E system and activities should be developed and harmonized with the overall programme implementation cycle and included in the corresponding work plans; \\n Programme implementation methods should be designed to permit the analysis and incorporation of M&E results into planning and coordination of activities in order to provide programmes with the capacity to modify the implementation approach based on M&E results and lessons learned.", + "Paragraph": "Provisions for M&E, and in particular the key elements of a strategy and framework, should be integrated into the programme development and implementation process from the beginning. This should occur in the following ways: \n Performance indicators relevant for M&E should be identified, together with the devel\u00ad opment of a baseline study and indicators framework for the comprehensive assessment, as well as the results framework for the DDR programme itself (see IDDRS 3.20 on DDR Programme Design for advice on the development of a results framework); \n Requirements for establishing and implementing an M&E system should be taken into consideration during the identification of programme requirements, including dedicated staff, material and information management systems; \n Key aspects of the M&E system and activities should be developed and harmonized with the overall programme implementation cycle and included in the corresponding work plans; \n Programme implementation methods should be designed to permit the analysis and incorporation of M&E results into planning and coordination of activities in order to provide programmes with the capacity to modify the implementation approach based on M&E results and lessons learned.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -65251,7 +65251,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1176, - "Paragraph": "Provisions for M&E, and in particular the key elements of a strategy and framework, should be integrated into the programme development and implementation process from the beginning. This should occur in the following ways: \\n Performance indicators relevant for M&E should be identified, together with the devel\u00ad opment of a baseline study and indicators framework for the comprehensive assessment, as well as the results framework for the DDR programme itself (see IDDRS 3.20 on DDR Programme Design for advice on the development of a results framework); \\n Requirements for establishing and implementing an M&E system should be taken into consideration during the identification of programme requirements, including dedicated staff, material and information management systems; \\n Key aspects of the M&E system and activities should be developed and harmonized with the overall programme implementation cycle and included in the corresponding work plans; \\n Programme implementation methods should be designed to permit the analysis and incorporation of M&E results into planning and coordination of activities in order to provide programmes with the capacity to modify the implementation approach based on M&E results and lessons learned.", + "Paragraph": "Provisions for M&E, and in particular the key elements of a strategy and framework, should be integrated into the programme development and implementation process from the beginning. This should occur in the following ways: \n Performance indicators relevant for M&E should be identified, together with the devel\u00ad opment of a baseline study and indicators framework for the comprehensive assessment, as well as the results framework for the DDR programme itself (see IDDRS 3.20 on DDR Programme Design for advice on the development of a results framework); \n Requirements for establishing and implementing an M&E system should be taken into consideration during the identification of programme requirements, including dedicated staff, material and information management systems; \n Key aspects of the M&E system and activities should be developed and harmonized with the overall programme implementation cycle and included in the corresponding work plans; \n Programme implementation methods should be designed to permit the analysis and incorporation of M&E results into planning and coordination of activities in order to provide programmes with the capacity to modify the implementation approach based on M&E results and lessons learned.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -65262,7 +65262,7 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Integrating M&E in programme development and implementation", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This should occur in the following ways: \\n Performance indicators relevant for M&E should be identified, together with the devel\u00ad opment of a baseline study and indicators framework for the comprehensive assessment, as well as the results framework for the DDR programme itself (see IDDRS 3.20 on DDR Programme Design for advice on the development of a results framework); \\n Requirements for establishing and implementing an M&E system should be taken into consideration during the identification of programme requirements, including dedicated staff, material and information management systems; \\n Key aspects of the M&E system and activities should be developed and harmonized with the overall programme implementation cycle and included in the corresponding work plans; \\n Programme implementation methods should be designed to permit the analysis and incorporation of M&E results into planning and coordination of activities in order to provide programmes with the capacity to modify the implementation approach based on M&E results and lessons learned.", + "Sentence": "This should occur in the following ways: \n Performance indicators relevant for M&E should be identified, together with the devel\u00ad opment of a baseline study and indicators framework for the comprehensive assessment, as well as the results framework for the DDR programme itself (see IDDRS 3.20 on DDR Programme Design for advice on the development of a results framework); \n Requirements for establishing and implementing an M&E system should be taken into consideration during the identification of programme requirements, including dedicated staff, material and information management systems; \n Key aspects of the M&E system and activities should be developed and harmonized with the overall programme implementation cycle and included in the corresponding work plans; \n Programme implementation methods should be designed to permit the analysis and incorporation of M&E results into planning and coordination of activities in order to provide programmes with the capacity to modify the implementation approach based on M&E results and lessons learned.", "newParagraph": "provision particular key element strategy framework integrated programme development implementation process beginning occur following way n performance indicator relevant identified together devel opment baseline study indicator framework comprehensive assessment well result framework ddr programme see iddrs 320 ddr programme design advice development result framework n requirement establishing implementing system taken consideration identification programme requirement including dedicated staff material information management system n key aspect system activity developed harmonized overall programme implementation cycle included corresponding work plan n programme implementation method designed permit analysis incorporation result planning coordination activity order provide programme capacity modify implementation approach based result lesson learned", "ProcessedSent": "occur following way n performance indicator relevant identified together devel opment baseline study indicator framework comprehensive assessment well result framework ddr programme see iddrs 320 ddr programme design advice development result framework n requirement establishing implementing system taken consideration identification programme requirement including dedicated staff material information management system n key aspect system activity developed harmonized overall programme implementation cycle included corresponding work plan n programme implementation method designed permit analysis incorporation result planning coordination activity order provide programme capacity modify implementation approach based result lesson learned", "SentID": 3625 @@ -65359,7 +65359,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1180, - "Paragraph": "Indicators are variables (i.e., factors that can change, e.g., number of weapons collected) that should be measured to reveal progress (or lack thereof) towards the achievement of objectives, outcomes or outputs, and should provide information on what has been achieved in either quantitative or qualitative terms, or changes over time. In order for indicators to be meaningful, measurement must be made against a baseline, or baseline data, both of which are collected either in the context of the pre\u00adprogramme comprehensive assessment or during programme implementation. In general, most indicators should be developed together with the definition of programme activities, outputs, outcomes, objectives and goals. In general, indicators can be classified as follows: \\n Performance indicator: A particular characteristic or dimension used to measure intended changes defined by a programme results framework. Performance indicators are used to observe progress and to measure actual outputs and outcomes compared to those that were expected. They indicate \u2018how, \u2018whether\u2019 or \u2018to what extent\u2019 a unit is pro\u00ad gressing towards its objectives, rather than \u2018why\u2019 or \u2018why not\u2019 such progress is being made. Performance indicators are usually expressed in quantifiable terms, and should be objective and measurable (e.g., numeric values, percentages, scores and indices); \\n Impact indicator: A variable or set of variables used to measure the overall and long\u00ad term impact of an intervention, i.e., overall changes in the environment that DDR aims to influence. Impact indicators often use a composite set (or group) of indicators, each of which provides information on the size, sustainability and consequences of a change brought about by a DDR intervention. Such indicators can include both quan\u00ad titative variables (e.g., change in homicide levels or incidence of violence) or qualitative variables (e.g., behavioural change among reintegrated ex\u00adcombatants, social cohesion, etc.). Impact indicators depend on comprehensive and reliable baseline data, and should be as specific in possible in order to isolate the impact of DDR on complex social and economic dynamics from other factors and processes; \\n Proxy indicators: Cost, complexity and\/or the timeliness of data collection may prevent a result from being measured directly. In this case, proxy indicators \u2014 which are variables that substitute for others that are difficult to measure directly \u2014 may reveal performance trends and make managers aware of potential problems or areas of success. This is often the case for outcomes in behavioural change, social cohesion and other results that are difficult to measure.", + "Paragraph": "Indicators are variables (i.e., factors that can change, e.g., number of weapons collected) that should be measured to reveal progress (or lack thereof) towards the achievement of objectives, outcomes or outputs, and should provide information on what has been achieved in either quantitative or qualitative terms, or changes over time. In order for indicators to be meaningful, measurement must be made against a baseline, or baseline data, both of which are collected either in the context of the pre\u00adprogramme comprehensive assessment or during programme implementation. In general, most indicators should be developed together with the definition of programme activities, outputs, outcomes, objectives and goals. In general, indicators can be classified as follows: \n Performance indicator: A particular characteristic or dimension used to measure intended changes defined by a programme results framework. Performance indicators are used to observe progress and to measure actual outputs and outcomes compared to those that were expected. They indicate \u2018how, \u2018whether\u2019 or \u2018to what extent\u2019 a unit is pro\u00ad gressing towards its objectives, rather than \u2018why\u2019 or \u2018why not\u2019 such progress is being made. Performance indicators are usually expressed in quantifiable terms, and should be objective and measurable (e.g., numeric values, percentages, scores and indices); \n Impact indicator: A variable or set of variables used to measure the overall and long\u00ad term impact of an intervention, i.e., overall changes in the environment that DDR aims to influence. Impact indicators often use a composite set (or group) of indicators, each of which provides information on the size, sustainability and consequences of a change brought about by a DDR intervention. Such indicators can include both quan\u00ad titative variables (e.g., change in homicide levels or incidence of violence) or qualitative variables (e.g., behavioural change among reintegrated ex\u00adcombatants, social cohesion, etc.). Impact indicators depend on comprehensive and reliable baseline data, and should be as specific in possible in order to isolate the impact of DDR on complex social and economic dynamics from other factors and processes; \n Proxy indicators: Cost, complexity and\/or the timeliness of data collection may prevent a result from being measured directly. In this case, proxy indicators \u2014 which are variables that substitute for others that are difficult to measure directly \u2014 may reveal performance trends and make managers aware of potential problems or areas of success. This is often the case for outcomes in behavioural change, social cohesion and other results that are difficult to measure.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -65377,7 +65377,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1180, - "Paragraph": "Indicators are variables (i.e., factors that can change, e.g., number of weapons collected) that should be measured to reveal progress (or lack thereof) towards the achievement of objectives, outcomes or outputs, and should provide information on what has been achieved in either quantitative or qualitative terms, or changes over time. In order for indicators to be meaningful, measurement must be made against a baseline, or baseline data, both of which are collected either in the context of the pre\u00adprogramme comprehensive assessment or during programme implementation. In general, most indicators should be developed together with the definition of programme activities, outputs, outcomes, objectives and goals. In general, indicators can be classified as follows: \\n Performance indicator: A particular characteristic or dimension used to measure intended changes defined by a programme results framework. Performance indicators are used to observe progress and to measure actual outputs and outcomes compared to those that were expected. They indicate \u2018how, \u2018whether\u2019 or \u2018to what extent\u2019 a unit is pro\u00ad gressing towards its objectives, rather than \u2018why\u2019 or \u2018why not\u2019 such progress is being made. Performance indicators are usually expressed in quantifiable terms, and should be objective and measurable (e.g., numeric values, percentages, scores and indices); \\n Impact indicator: A variable or set of variables used to measure the overall and long\u00ad term impact of an intervention, i.e., overall changes in the environment that DDR aims to influence. Impact indicators often use a composite set (or group) of indicators, each of which provides information on the size, sustainability and consequences of a change brought about by a DDR intervention. Such indicators can include both quan\u00ad titative variables (e.g., change in homicide levels or incidence of violence) or qualitative variables (e.g., behavioural change among reintegrated ex\u00adcombatants, social cohesion, etc.). Impact indicators depend on comprehensive and reliable baseline data, and should be as specific in possible in order to isolate the impact of DDR on complex social and economic dynamics from other factors and processes; \\n Proxy indicators: Cost, complexity and\/or the timeliness of data collection may prevent a result from being measured directly. In this case, proxy indicators \u2014 which are variables that substitute for others that are difficult to measure directly \u2014 may reveal performance trends and make managers aware of potential problems or areas of success. This is often the case for outcomes in behavioural change, social cohesion and other results that are difficult to measure.", + "Paragraph": "Indicators are variables (i.e., factors that can change, e.g., number of weapons collected) that should be measured to reveal progress (or lack thereof) towards the achievement of objectives, outcomes or outputs, and should provide information on what has been achieved in either quantitative or qualitative terms, or changes over time. In order for indicators to be meaningful, measurement must be made against a baseline, or baseline data, both of which are collected either in the context of the pre\u00adprogramme comprehensive assessment or during programme implementation. In general, most indicators should be developed together with the definition of programme activities, outputs, outcomes, objectives and goals. In general, indicators can be classified as follows: \n Performance indicator: A particular characteristic or dimension used to measure intended changes defined by a programme results framework. Performance indicators are used to observe progress and to measure actual outputs and outcomes compared to those that were expected. They indicate \u2018how, \u2018whether\u2019 or \u2018to what extent\u2019 a unit is pro\u00ad gressing towards its objectives, rather than \u2018why\u2019 or \u2018why not\u2019 such progress is being made. Performance indicators are usually expressed in quantifiable terms, and should be objective and measurable (e.g., numeric values, percentages, scores and indices); \n Impact indicator: A variable or set of variables used to measure the overall and long\u00ad term impact of an intervention, i.e., overall changes in the environment that DDR aims to influence. Impact indicators often use a composite set (or group) of indicators, each of which provides information on the size, sustainability and consequences of a change brought about by a DDR intervention. Such indicators can include both quan\u00ad titative variables (e.g., change in homicide levels or incidence of violence) or qualitative variables (e.g., behavioural change among reintegrated ex\u00adcombatants, social cohesion, etc.). Impact indicators depend on comprehensive and reliable baseline data, and should be as specific in possible in order to isolate the impact of DDR on complex social and economic dynamics from other factors and processes; \n Proxy indicators: Cost, complexity and\/or the timeliness of data collection may prevent a result from being measured directly. In this case, proxy indicators \u2014 which are variables that substitute for others that are difficult to measure directly \u2014 may reveal performance trends and make managers aware of potential problems or areas of success. This is often the case for outcomes in behavioural change, social cohesion and other results that are difficult to measure.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -65395,7 +65395,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1180, - "Paragraph": "Indicators are variables (i.e., factors that can change, e.g., number of weapons collected) that should be measured to reveal progress (or lack thereof) towards the achievement of objectives, outcomes or outputs, and should provide information on what has been achieved in either quantitative or qualitative terms, or changes over time. In order for indicators to be meaningful, measurement must be made against a baseline, or baseline data, both of which are collected either in the context of the pre\u00adprogramme comprehensive assessment or during programme implementation. In general, most indicators should be developed together with the definition of programme activities, outputs, outcomes, objectives and goals. In general, indicators can be classified as follows: \\n Performance indicator: A particular characteristic or dimension used to measure intended changes defined by a programme results framework. Performance indicators are used to observe progress and to measure actual outputs and outcomes compared to those that were expected. They indicate \u2018how, \u2018whether\u2019 or \u2018to what extent\u2019 a unit is pro\u00ad gressing towards its objectives, rather than \u2018why\u2019 or \u2018why not\u2019 such progress is being made. Performance indicators are usually expressed in quantifiable terms, and should be objective and measurable (e.g., numeric values, percentages, scores and indices); \\n Impact indicator: A variable or set of variables used to measure the overall and long\u00ad term impact of an intervention, i.e., overall changes in the environment that DDR aims to influence. Impact indicators often use a composite set (or group) of indicators, each of which provides information on the size, sustainability and consequences of a change brought about by a DDR intervention. Such indicators can include both quan\u00ad titative variables (e.g., change in homicide levels or incidence of violence) or qualitative variables (e.g., behavioural change among reintegrated ex\u00adcombatants, social cohesion, etc.). Impact indicators depend on comprehensive and reliable baseline data, and should be as specific in possible in order to isolate the impact of DDR on complex social and economic dynamics from other factors and processes; \\n Proxy indicators: Cost, complexity and\/or the timeliness of data collection may prevent a result from being measured directly. In this case, proxy indicators \u2014 which are variables that substitute for others that are difficult to measure directly \u2014 may reveal performance trends and make managers aware of potential problems or areas of success. This is often the case for outcomes in behavioural change, social cohesion and other results that are difficult to measure.", + "Paragraph": "Indicators are variables (i.e., factors that can change, e.g., number of weapons collected) that should be measured to reveal progress (or lack thereof) towards the achievement of objectives, outcomes or outputs, and should provide information on what has been achieved in either quantitative or qualitative terms, or changes over time. In order for indicators to be meaningful, measurement must be made against a baseline, or baseline data, both of which are collected either in the context of the pre\u00adprogramme comprehensive assessment or during programme implementation. In general, most indicators should be developed together with the definition of programme activities, outputs, outcomes, objectives and goals. In general, indicators can be classified as follows: \n Performance indicator: A particular characteristic or dimension used to measure intended changes defined by a programme results framework. Performance indicators are used to observe progress and to measure actual outputs and outcomes compared to those that were expected. They indicate \u2018how, \u2018whether\u2019 or \u2018to what extent\u2019 a unit is pro\u00ad gressing towards its objectives, rather than \u2018why\u2019 or \u2018why not\u2019 such progress is being made. Performance indicators are usually expressed in quantifiable terms, and should be objective and measurable (e.g., numeric values, percentages, scores and indices); \n Impact indicator: A variable or set of variables used to measure the overall and long\u00ad term impact of an intervention, i.e., overall changes in the environment that DDR aims to influence. Impact indicators often use a composite set (or group) of indicators, each of which provides information on the size, sustainability and consequences of a change brought about by a DDR intervention. Such indicators can include both quan\u00ad titative variables (e.g., change in homicide levels or incidence of violence) or qualitative variables (e.g., behavioural change among reintegrated ex\u00adcombatants, social cohesion, etc.). Impact indicators depend on comprehensive and reliable baseline data, and should be as specific in possible in order to isolate the impact of DDR on complex social and economic dynamics from other factors and processes; \n Proxy indicators: Cost, complexity and\/or the timeliness of data collection may prevent a result from being measured directly. In this case, proxy indicators \u2014 which are variables that substitute for others that are difficult to measure directly \u2014 may reveal performance trends and make managers aware of potential problems or areas of success. This is often the case for outcomes in behavioural change, social cohesion and other results that are difficult to measure.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -65413,7 +65413,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1180, - "Paragraph": "Indicators are variables (i.e., factors that can change, e.g., number of weapons collected) that should be measured to reveal progress (or lack thereof) towards the achievement of objectives, outcomes or outputs, and should provide information on what has been achieved in either quantitative or qualitative terms, or changes over time. In order for indicators to be meaningful, measurement must be made against a baseline, or baseline data, both of which are collected either in the context of the pre\u00adprogramme comprehensive assessment or during programme implementation. In general, most indicators should be developed together with the definition of programme activities, outputs, outcomes, objectives and goals. In general, indicators can be classified as follows: \\n Performance indicator: A particular characteristic or dimension used to measure intended changes defined by a programme results framework. Performance indicators are used to observe progress and to measure actual outputs and outcomes compared to those that were expected. They indicate \u2018how, \u2018whether\u2019 or \u2018to what extent\u2019 a unit is pro\u00ad gressing towards its objectives, rather than \u2018why\u2019 or \u2018why not\u2019 such progress is being made. Performance indicators are usually expressed in quantifiable terms, and should be objective and measurable (e.g., numeric values, percentages, scores and indices); \\n Impact indicator: A variable or set of variables used to measure the overall and long\u00ad term impact of an intervention, i.e., overall changes in the environment that DDR aims to influence. Impact indicators often use a composite set (or group) of indicators, each of which provides information on the size, sustainability and consequences of a change brought about by a DDR intervention. Such indicators can include both quan\u00ad titative variables (e.g., change in homicide levels or incidence of violence) or qualitative variables (e.g., behavioural change among reintegrated ex\u00adcombatants, social cohesion, etc.). Impact indicators depend on comprehensive and reliable baseline data, and should be as specific in possible in order to isolate the impact of DDR on complex social and economic dynamics from other factors and processes; \\n Proxy indicators: Cost, complexity and\/or the timeliness of data collection may prevent a result from being measured directly. In this case, proxy indicators \u2014 which are variables that substitute for others that are difficult to measure directly \u2014 may reveal performance trends and make managers aware of potential problems or areas of success. This is often the case for outcomes in behavioural change, social cohesion and other results that are difficult to measure.", + "Paragraph": "Indicators are variables (i.e., factors that can change, e.g., number of weapons collected) that should be measured to reveal progress (or lack thereof) towards the achievement of objectives, outcomes or outputs, and should provide information on what has been achieved in either quantitative or qualitative terms, or changes over time. In order for indicators to be meaningful, measurement must be made against a baseline, or baseline data, both of which are collected either in the context of the pre\u00adprogramme comprehensive assessment or during programme implementation. In general, most indicators should be developed together with the definition of programme activities, outputs, outcomes, objectives and goals. In general, indicators can be classified as follows: \n Performance indicator: A particular characteristic or dimension used to measure intended changes defined by a programme results framework. Performance indicators are used to observe progress and to measure actual outputs and outcomes compared to those that were expected. They indicate \u2018how, \u2018whether\u2019 or \u2018to what extent\u2019 a unit is pro\u00ad gressing towards its objectives, rather than \u2018why\u2019 or \u2018why not\u2019 such progress is being made. Performance indicators are usually expressed in quantifiable terms, and should be objective and measurable (e.g., numeric values, percentages, scores and indices); \n Impact indicator: A variable or set of variables used to measure the overall and long\u00ad term impact of an intervention, i.e., overall changes in the environment that DDR aims to influence. Impact indicators often use a composite set (or group) of indicators, each of which provides information on the size, sustainability and consequences of a change brought about by a DDR intervention. Such indicators can include both quan\u00ad titative variables (e.g., change in homicide levels or incidence of violence) or qualitative variables (e.g., behavioural change among reintegrated ex\u00adcombatants, social cohesion, etc.). Impact indicators depend on comprehensive and reliable baseline data, and should be as specific in possible in order to isolate the impact of DDR on complex social and economic dynamics from other factors and processes; \n Proxy indicators: Cost, complexity and\/or the timeliness of data collection may prevent a result from being measured directly. In this case, proxy indicators \u2014 which are variables that substitute for others that are difficult to measure directly \u2014 may reveal performance trends and make managers aware of potential problems or areas of success. This is often the case for outcomes in behavioural change, social cohesion and other results that are difficult to measure.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -65424,14 +65424,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.4. Development of M&E indicators", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "In general, indicators can be classified as follows: \\n Performance indicator: A particular characteristic or dimension used to measure intended changes defined by a programme results framework.", + "Sentence": "In general, indicators can be classified as follows: \n Performance indicator: A particular characteristic or dimension used to measure intended changes defined by a programme results framework.", "newParagraph": "indicator variable ie factor change eg number weapon collected measured reveal progress lack thereof towards achievement objective outcome output provide information achieved either quantitative qualitative term change time order indicator meaningful measurement must made baseline baseline data collected either context pre programme comprehensive assessment programme implementation general indicator developed together definition programme activity output outcome objective goal general indicator classified follows n performance indicator particular characteristic dimension used measure intended change defined programme result framework performance indicator used observe progress measure actual output outcome compared expected indicate whether extent unit pro gressing towards objective rather progress made performance indicator usually expressed quantifiable term objective measurable eg numeric value percentage score index n impact indicator variable set variable used measure overall long term impact intervention ie overall change environment ddr aim influence impact indicator often use composite set group indicator provides information size sustainability consequence change brought ddr intervention indicator include quan titative variable eg change homicide level incidence violence qualitative variable eg behavioural change among reintegrated ex combatant social cohesion etc impact indicator depend comprehensive reliable baseline data specific possible order isolate impact ddr complex social economic dynamic factor process n proxy indicator cost complexity andor timeliness data collection may prevent result measured directly case proxy indicator variable substitute others difficult measure directly may reveal performance trend make manager aware potential problem area success often case outcome behavioural change social cohesion result difficult measure", "ProcessedSent": "general indicator classified follows n performance indicator particular characteristic dimension used measure intended change defined programme result framework", "SentID": 3634 }, { "ParagraphID": 1180, - "Paragraph": "Indicators are variables (i.e., factors that can change, e.g., number of weapons collected) that should be measured to reveal progress (or lack thereof) towards the achievement of objectives, outcomes or outputs, and should provide information on what has been achieved in either quantitative or qualitative terms, or changes over time. In order for indicators to be meaningful, measurement must be made against a baseline, or baseline data, both of which are collected either in the context of the pre\u00adprogramme comprehensive assessment or during programme implementation. In general, most indicators should be developed together with the definition of programme activities, outputs, outcomes, objectives and goals. In general, indicators can be classified as follows: \\n Performance indicator: A particular characteristic or dimension used to measure intended changes defined by a programme results framework. Performance indicators are used to observe progress and to measure actual outputs and outcomes compared to those that were expected. They indicate \u2018how, \u2018whether\u2019 or \u2018to what extent\u2019 a unit is pro\u00ad gressing towards its objectives, rather than \u2018why\u2019 or \u2018why not\u2019 such progress is being made. Performance indicators are usually expressed in quantifiable terms, and should be objective and measurable (e.g., numeric values, percentages, scores and indices); \\n Impact indicator: A variable or set of variables used to measure the overall and long\u00ad term impact of an intervention, i.e., overall changes in the environment that DDR aims to influence. Impact indicators often use a composite set (or group) of indicators, each of which provides information on the size, sustainability and consequences of a change brought about by a DDR intervention. Such indicators can include both quan\u00ad titative variables (e.g., change in homicide levels or incidence of violence) or qualitative variables (e.g., behavioural change among reintegrated ex\u00adcombatants, social cohesion, etc.). Impact indicators depend on comprehensive and reliable baseline data, and should be as specific in possible in order to isolate the impact of DDR on complex social and economic dynamics from other factors and processes; \\n Proxy indicators: Cost, complexity and\/or the timeliness of data collection may prevent a result from being measured directly. In this case, proxy indicators \u2014 which are variables that substitute for others that are difficult to measure directly \u2014 may reveal performance trends and make managers aware of potential problems or areas of success. This is often the case for outcomes in behavioural change, social cohesion and other results that are difficult to measure.", + "Paragraph": "Indicators are variables (i.e., factors that can change, e.g., number of weapons collected) that should be measured to reveal progress (or lack thereof) towards the achievement of objectives, outcomes or outputs, and should provide information on what has been achieved in either quantitative or qualitative terms, or changes over time. In order for indicators to be meaningful, measurement must be made against a baseline, or baseline data, both of which are collected either in the context of the pre\u00adprogramme comprehensive assessment or during programme implementation. In general, most indicators should be developed together with the definition of programme activities, outputs, outcomes, objectives and goals. In general, indicators can be classified as follows: \n Performance indicator: A particular characteristic or dimension used to measure intended changes defined by a programme results framework. Performance indicators are used to observe progress and to measure actual outputs and outcomes compared to those that were expected. They indicate \u2018how, \u2018whether\u2019 or \u2018to what extent\u2019 a unit is pro\u00ad gressing towards its objectives, rather than \u2018why\u2019 or \u2018why not\u2019 such progress is being made. Performance indicators are usually expressed in quantifiable terms, and should be objective and measurable (e.g., numeric values, percentages, scores and indices); \n Impact indicator: A variable or set of variables used to measure the overall and long\u00ad term impact of an intervention, i.e., overall changes in the environment that DDR aims to influence. Impact indicators often use a composite set (or group) of indicators, each of which provides information on the size, sustainability and consequences of a change brought about by a DDR intervention. Such indicators can include both quan\u00ad titative variables (e.g., change in homicide levels or incidence of violence) or qualitative variables (e.g., behavioural change among reintegrated ex\u00adcombatants, social cohesion, etc.). Impact indicators depend on comprehensive and reliable baseline data, and should be as specific in possible in order to isolate the impact of DDR on complex social and economic dynamics from other factors and processes; \n Proxy indicators: Cost, complexity and\/or the timeliness of data collection may prevent a result from being measured directly. In this case, proxy indicators \u2014 which are variables that substitute for others that are difficult to measure directly \u2014 may reveal performance trends and make managers aware of potential problems or areas of success. This is often the case for outcomes in behavioural change, social cohesion and other results that are difficult to measure.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -65449,7 +65449,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1180, - "Paragraph": "Indicators are variables (i.e., factors that can change, e.g., number of weapons collected) that should be measured to reveal progress (or lack thereof) towards the achievement of objectives, outcomes or outputs, and should provide information on what has been achieved in either quantitative or qualitative terms, or changes over time. In order for indicators to be meaningful, measurement must be made against a baseline, or baseline data, both of which are collected either in the context of the pre\u00adprogramme comprehensive assessment or during programme implementation. In general, most indicators should be developed together with the definition of programme activities, outputs, outcomes, objectives and goals. In general, indicators can be classified as follows: \\n Performance indicator: A particular characteristic or dimension used to measure intended changes defined by a programme results framework. Performance indicators are used to observe progress and to measure actual outputs and outcomes compared to those that were expected. They indicate \u2018how, \u2018whether\u2019 or \u2018to what extent\u2019 a unit is pro\u00ad gressing towards its objectives, rather than \u2018why\u2019 or \u2018why not\u2019 such progress is being made. Performance indicators are usually expressed in quantifiable terms, and should be objective and measurable (e.g., numeric values, percentages, scores and indices); \\n Impact indicator: A variable or set of variables used to measure the overall and long\u00ad term impact of an intervention, i.e., overall changes in the environment that DDR aims to influence. Impact indicators often use a composite set (or group) of indicators, each of which provides information on the size, sustainability and consequences of a change brought about by a DDR intervention. Such indicators can include both quan\u00ad titative variables (e.g., change in homicide levels or incidence of violence) or qualitative variables (e.g., behavioural change among reintegrated ex\u00adcombatants, social cohesion, etc.). Impact indicators depend on comprehensive and reliable baseline data, and should be as specific in possible in order to isolate the impact of DDR on complex social and economic dynamics from other factors and processes; \\n Proxy indicators: Cost, complexity and\/or the timeliness of data collection may prevent a result from being measured directly. In this case, proxy indicators \u2014 which are variables that substitute for others that are difficult to measure directly \u2014 may reveal performance trends and make managers aware of potential problems or areas of success. This is often the case for outcomes in behavioural change, social cohesion and other results that are difficult to measure.", + "Paragraph": "Indicators are variables (i.e., factors that can change, e.g., number of weapons collected) that should be measured to reveal progress (or lack thereof) towards the achievement of objectives, outcomes or outputs, and should provide information on what has been achieved in either quantitative or qualitative terms, or changes over time. In order for indicators to be meaningful, measurement must be made against a baseline, or baseline data, both of which are collected either in the context of the pre\u00adprogramme comprehensive assessment or during programme implementation. In general, most indicators should be developed together with the definition of programme activities, outputs, outcomes, objectives and goals. In general, indicators can be classified as follows: \n Performance indicator: A particular characteristic or dimension used to measure intended changes defined by a programme results framework. Performance indicators are used to observe progress and to measure actual outputs and outcomes compared to those that were expected. They indicate \u2018how, \u2018whether\u2019 or \u2018to what extent\u2019 a unit is pro\u00ad gressing towards its objectives, rather than \u2018why\u2019 or \u2018why not\u2019 such progress is being made. Performance indicators are usually expressed in quantifiable terms, and should be objective and measurable (e.g., numeric values, percentages, scores and indices); \n Impact indicator: A variable or set of variables used to measure the overall and long\u00ad term impact of an intervention, i.e., overall changes in the environment that DDR aims to influence. Impact indicators often use a composite set (or group) of indicators, each of which provides information on the size, sustainability and consequences of a change brought about by a DDR intervention. Such indicators can include both quan\u00ad titative variables (e.g., change in homicide levels or incidence of violence) or qualitative variables (e.g., behavioural change among reintegrated ex\u00adcombatants, social cohesion, etc.). Impact indicators depend on comprehensive and reliable baseline data, and should be as specific in possible in order to isolate the impact of DDR on complex social and economic dynamics from other factors and processes; \n Proxy indicators: Cost, complexity and\/or the timeliness of data collection may prevent a result from being measured directly. In this case, proxy indicators \u2014 which are variables that substitute for others that are difficult to measure directly \u2014 may reveal performance trends and make managers aware of potential problems or areas of success. This is often the case for outcomes in behavioural change, social cohesion and other results that are difficult to measure.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -65467,7 +65467,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1180, - "Paragraph": "Indicators are variables (i.e., factors that can change, e.g., number of weapons collected) that should be measured to reveal progress (or lack thereof) towards the achievement of objectives, outcomes or outputs, and should provide information on what has been achieved in either quantitative or qualitative terms, or changes over time. In order for indicators to be meaningful, measurement must be made against a baseline, or baseline data, both of which are collected either in the context of the pre\u00adprogramme comprehensive assessment or during programme implementation. In general, most indicators should be developed together with the definition of programme activities, outputs, outcomes, objectives and goals. In general, indicators can be classified as follows: \\n Performance indicator: A particular characteristic or dimension used to measure intended changes defined by a programme results framework. Performance indicators are used to observe progress and to measure actual outputs and outcomes compared to those that were expected. They indicate \u2018how, \u2018whether\u2019 or \u2018to what extent\u2019 a unit is pro\u00ad gressing towards its objectives, rather than \u2018why\u2019 or \u2018why not\u2019 such progress is being made. Performance indicators are usually expressed in quantifiable terms, and should be objective and measurable (e.g., numeric values, percentages, scores and indices); \\n Impact indicator: A variable or set of variables used to measure the overall and long\u00ad term impact of an intervention, i.e., overall changes in the environment that DDR aims to influence. Impact indicators often use a composite set (or group) of indicators, each of which provides information on the size, sustainability and consequences of a change brought about by a DDR intervention. Such indicators can include both quan\u00ad titative variables (e.g., change in homicide levels or incidence of violence) or qualitative variables (e.g., behavioural change among reintegrated ex\u00adcombatants, social cohesion, etc.). Impact indicators depend on comprehensive and reliable baseline data, and should be as specific in possible in order to isolate the impact of DDR on complex social and economic dynamics from other factors and processes; \\n Proxy indicators: Cost, complexity and\/or the timeliness of data collection may prevent a result from being measured directly. In this case, proxy indicators \u2014 which are variables that substitute for others that are difficult to measure directly \u2014 may reveal performance trends and make managers aware of potential problems or areas of success. This is often the case for outcomes in behavioural change, social cohesion and other results that are difficult to measure.", + "Paragraph": "Indicators are variables (i.e., factors that can change, e.g., number of weapons collected) that should be measured to reveal progress (or lack thereof) towards the achievement of objectives, outcomes or outputs, and should provide information on what has been achieved in either quantitative or qualitative terms, or changes over time. In order for indicators to be meaningful, measurement must be made against a baseline, or baseline data, both of which are collected either in the context of the pre\u00adprogramme comprehensive assessment or during programme implementation. In general, most indicators should be developed together with the definition of programme activities, outputs, outcomes, objectives and goals. In general, indicators can be classified as follows: \n Performance indicator: A particular characteristic or dimension used to measure intended changes defined by a programme results framework. Performance indicators are used to observe progress and to measure actual outputs and outcomes compared to those that were expected. They indicate \u2018how, \u2018whether\u2019 or \u2018to what extent\u2019 a unit is pro\u00ad gressing towards its objectives, rather than \u2018why\u2019 or \u2018why not\u2019 such progress is being made. Performance indicators are usually expressed in quantifiable terms, and should be objective and measurable (e.g., numeric values, percentages, scores and indices); \n Impact indicator: A variable or set of variables used to measure the overall and long\u00ad term impact of an intervention, i.e., overall changes in the environment that DDR aims to influence. Impact indicators often use a composite set (or group) of indicators, each of which provides information on the size, sustainability and consequences of a change brought about by a DDR intervention. Such indicators can include both quan\u00ad titative variables (e.g., change in homicide levels or incidence of violence) or qualitative variables (e.g., behavioural change among reintegrated ex\u00adcombatants, social cohesion, etc.). Impact indicators depend on comprehensive and reliable baseline data, and should be as specific in possible in order to isolate the impact of DDR on complex social and economic dynamics from other factors and processes; \n Proxy indicators: Cost, complexity and\/or the timeliness of data collection may prevent a result from being measured directly. In this case, proxy indicators \u2014 which are variables that substitute for others that are difficult to measure directly \u2014 may reveal performance trends and make managers aware of potential problems or areas of success. This is often the case for outcomes in behavioural change, social cohesion and other results that are difficult to measure.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -65478,14 +65478,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.4. Development of M&E indicators", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Performance indicators are usually expressed in quantifiable terms, and should be objective and measurable (e.g., numeric values, percentages, scores and indices); \\n Impact indicator: A variable or set of variables used to measure the overall and long\u00ad term impact of an intervention, i.e., overall changes in the environment that DDR aims to influence.", + "Sentence": "Performance indicators are usually expressed in quantifiable terms, and should be objective and measurable (e.g., numeric values, percentages, scores and indices); \n Impact indicator: A variable or set of variables used to measure the overall and long\u00ad term impact of an intervention, i.e., overall changes in the environment that DDR aims to influence.", "newParagraph": "indicator variable ie factor change eg number weapon collected measured reveal progress lack thereof towards achievement objective outcome output provide information achieved either quantitative qualitative term change time order indicator meaningful measurement must made baseline baseline data collected either context pre programme comprehensive assessment programme implementation general indicator developed together definition programme activity output outcome objective goal general indicator classified follows n performance indicator particular characteristic dimension used measure intended change defined programme result framework performance indicator used observe progress measure actual output outcome compared expected indicate whether extent unit pro gressing towards objective rather progress made performance indicator usually expressed quantifiable term objective measurable eg numeric value percentage score index n impact indicator variable set variable used measure overall long term impact intervention ie overall change environment ddr aim influence impact indicator often use composite set group indicator provides information size sustainability consequence change brought ddr intervention indicator include quan titative variable eg change homicide level incidence violence qualitative variable eg behavioural change among reintegrated ex combatant social cohesion etc impact indicator depend comprehensive reliable baseline data specific possible order isolate impact ddr complex social economic dynamic factor process n proxy indicator cost complexity andor timeliness data collection may prevent result measured directly case proxy indicator variable substitute others difficult measure directly may reveal performance trend make manager aware potential problem area success often case outcome behavioural change social cohesion result difficult measure", "ProcessedSent": "performance indicator usually expressed quantifiable term objective measurable eg numeric value percentage score index n impact indicator variable set variable used measure overall long term impact intervention ie overall change environment ddr aim influence", "SentID": 3637 }, { "ParagraphID": 1180, - "Paragraph": "Indicators are variables (i.e., factors that can change, e.g., number of weapons collected) that should be measured to reveal progress (or lack thereof) towards the achievement of objectives, outcomes or outputs, and should provide information on what has been achieved in either quantitative or qualitative terms, or changes over time. In order for indicators to be meaningful, measurement must be made against a baseline, or baseline data, both of which are collected either in the context of the pre\u00adprogramme comprehensive assessment or during programme implementation. In general, most indicators should be developed together with the definition of programme activities, outputs, outcomes, objectives and goals. In general, indicators can be classified as follows: \\n Performance indicator: A particular characteristic or dimension used to measure intended changes defined by a programme results framework. Performance indicators are used to observe progress and to measure actual outputs and outcomes compared to those that were expected. They indicate \u2018how, \u2018whether\u2019 or \u2018to what extent\u2019 a unit is pro\u00ad gressing towards its objectives, rather than \u2018why\u2019 or \u2018why not\u2019 such progress is being made. Performance indicators are usually expressed in quantifiable terms, and should be objective and measurable (e.g., numeric values, percentages, scores and indices); \\n Impact indicator: A variable or set of variables used to measure the overall and long\u00ad term impact of an intervention, i.e., overall changes in the environment that DDR aims to influence. Impact indicators often use a composite set (or group) of indicators, each of which provides information on the size, sustainability and consequences of a change brought about by a DDR intervention. Such indicators can include both quan\u00ad titative variables (e.g., change in homicide levels or incidence of violence) or qualitative variables (e.g., behavioural change among reintegrated ex\u00adcombatants, social cohesion, etc.). Impact indicators depend on comprehensive and reliable baseline data, and should be as specific in possible in order to isolate the impact of DDR on complex social and economic dynamics from other factors and processes; \\n Proxy indicators: Cost, complexity and\/or the timeliness of data collection may prevent a result from being measured directly. In this case, proxy indicators \u2014 which are variables that substitute for others that are difficult to measure directly \u2014 may reveal performance trends and make managers aware of potential problems or areas of success. This is often the case for outcomes in behavioural change, social cohesion and other results that are difficult to measure.", + "Paragraph": "Indicators are variables (i.e., factors that can change, e.g., number of weapons collected) that should be measured to reveal progress (or lack thereof) towards the achievement of objectives, outcomes or outputs, and should provide information on what has been achieved in either quantitative or qualitative terms, or changes over time. In order for indicators to be meaningful, measurement must be made against a baseline, or baseline data, both of which are collected either in the context of the pre\u00adprogramme comprehensive assessment or during programme implementation. In general, most indicators should be developed together with the definition of programme activities, outputs, outcomes, objectives and goals. In general, indicators can be classified as follows: \n Performance indicator: A particular characteristic or dimension used to measure intended changes defined by a programme results framework. Performance indicators are used to observe progress and to measure actual outputs and outcomes compared to those that were expected. They indicate \u2018how, \u2018whether\u2019 or \u2018to what extent\u2019 a unit is pro\u00ad gressing towards its objectives, rather than \u2018why\u2019 or \u2018why not\u2019 such progress is being made. Performance indicators are usually expressed in quantifiable terms, and should be objective and measurable (e.g., numeric values, percentages, scores and indices); \n Impact indicator: A variable or set of variables used to measure the overall and long\u00ad term impact of an intervention, i.e., overall changes in the environment that DDR aims to influence. Impact indicators often use a composite set (or group) of indicators, each of which provides information on the size, sustainability and consequences of a change brought about by a DDR intervention. Such indicators can include both quan\u00ad titative variables (e.g., change in homicide levels or incidence of violence) or qualitative variables (e.g., behavioural change among reintegrated ex\u00adcombatants, social cohesion, etc.). Impact indicators depend on comprehensive and reliable baseline data, and should be as specific in possible in order to isolate the impact of DDR on complex social and economic dynamics from other factors and processes; \n Proxy indicators: Cost, complexity and\/or the timeliness of data collection may prevent a result from being measured directly. In this case, proxy indicators \u2014 which are variables that substitute for others that are difficult to measure directly \u2014 may reveal performance trends and make managers aware of potential problems or areas of success. This is often the case for outcomes in behavioural change, social cohesion and other results that are difficult to measure.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -65503,7 +65503,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1180, - "Paragraph": "Indicators are variables (i.e., factors that can change, e.g., number of weapons collected) that should be measured to reveal progress (or lack thereof) towards the achievement of objectives, outcomes or outputs, and should provide information on what has been achieved in either quantitative or qualitative terms, or changes over time. In order for indicators to be meaningful, measurement must be made against a baseline, or baseline data, both of which are collected either in the context of the pre\u00adprogramme comprehensive assessment or during programme implementation. In general, most indicators should be developed together with the definition of programme activities, outputs, outcomes, objectives and goals. In general, indicators can be classified as follows: \\n Performance indicator: A particular characteristic or dimension used to measure intended changes defined by a programme results framework. Performance indicators are used to observe progress and to measure actual outputs and outcomes compared to those that were expected. They indicate \u2018how, \u2018whether\u2019 or \u2018to what extent\u2019 a unit is pro\u00ad gressing towards its objectives, rather than \u2018why\u2019 or \u2018why not\u2019 such progress is being made. Performance indicators are usually expressed in quantifiable terms, and should be objective and measurable (e.g., numeric values, percentages, scores and indices); \\n Impact indicator: A variable or set of variables used to measure the overall and long\u00ad term impact of an intervention, i.e., overall changes in the environment that DDR aims to influence. Impact indicators often use a composite set (or group) of indicators, each of which provides information on the size, sustainability and consequences of a change brought about by a DDR intervention. Such indicators can include both quan\u00ad titative variables (e.g., change in homicide levels or incidence of violence) or qualitative variables (e.g., behavioural change among reintegrated ex\u00adcombatants, social cohesion, etc.). Impact indicators depend on comprehensive and reliable baseline data, and should be as specific in possible in order to isolate the impact of DDR on complex social and economic dynamics from other factors and processes; \\n Proxy indicators: Cost, complexity and\/or the timeliness of data collection may prevent a result from being measured directly. In this case, proxy indicators \u2014 which are variables that substitute for others that are difficult to measure directly \u2014 may reveal performance trends and make managers aware of potential problems or areas of success. This is often the case for outcomes in behavioural change, social cohesion and other results that are difficult to measure.", + "Paragraph": "Indicators are variables (i.e., factors that can change, e.g., number of weapons collected) that should be measured to reveal progress (or lack thereof) towards the achievement of objectives, outcomes or outputs, and should provide information on what has been achieved in either quantitative or qualitative terms, or changes over time. In order for indicators to be meaningful, measurement must be made against a baseline, or baseline data, both of which are collected either in the context of the pre\u00adprogramme comprehensive assessment or during programme implementation. In general, most indicators should be developed together with the definition of programme activities, outputs, outcomes, objectives and goals. In general, indicators can be classified as follows: \n Performance indicator: A particular characteristic or dimension used to measure intended changes defined by a programme results framework. Performance indicators are used to observe progress and to measure actual outputs and outcomes compared to those that were expected. They indicate \u2018how, \u2018whether\u2019 or \u2018to what extent\u2019 a unit is pro\u00ad gressing towards its objectives, rather than \u2018why\u2019 or \u2018why not\u2019 such progress is being made. Performance indicators are usually expressed in quantifiable terms, and should be objective and measurable (e.g., numeric values, percentages, scores and indices); \n Impact indicator: A variable or set of variables used to measure the overall and long\u00ad term impact of an intervention, i.e., overall changes in the environment that DDR aims to influence. Impact indicators often use a composite set (or group) of indicators, each of which provides information on the size, sustainability and consequences of a change brought about by a DDR intervention. Such indicators can include both quan\u00ad titative variables (e.g., change in homicide levels or incidence of violence) or qualitative variables (e.g., behavioural change among reintegrated ex\u00adcombatants, social cohesion, etc.). Impact indicators depend on comprehensive and reliable baseline data, and should be as specific in possible in order to isolate the impact of DDR on complex social and economic dynamics from other factors and processes; \n Proxy indicators: Cost, complexity and\/or the timeliness of data collection may prevent a result from being measured directly. In this case, proxy indicators \u2014 which are variables that substitute for others that are difficult to measure directly \u2014 may reveal performance trends and make managers aware of potential problems or areas of success. This is often the case for outcomes in behavioural change, social cohesion and other results that are difficult to measure.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -65521,7 +65521,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1180, - "Paragraph": "Indicators are variables (i.e., factors that can change, e.g., number of weapons collected) that should be measured to reveal progress (or lack thereof) towards the achievement of objectives, outcomes or outputs, and should provide information on what has been achieved in either quantitative or qualitative terms, or changes over time. In order for indicators to be meaningful, measurement must be made against a baseline, or baseline data, both of which are collected either in the context of the pre\u00adprogramme comprehensive assessment or during programme implementation. In general, most indicators should be developed together with the definition of programme activities, outputs, outcomes, objectives and goals. In general, indicators can be classified as follows: \\n Performance indicator: A particular characteristic or dimension used to measure intended changes defined by a programme results framework. Performance indicators are used to observe progress and to measure actual outputs and outcomes compared to those that were expected. They indicate \u2018how, \u2018whether\u2019 or \u2018to what extent\u2019 a unit is pro\u00ad gressing towards its objectives, rather than \u2018why\u2019 or \u2018why not\u2019 such progress is being made. Performance indicators are usually expressed in quantifiable terms, and should be objective and measurable (e.g., numeric values, percentages, scores and indices); \\n Impact indicator: A variable or set of variables used to measure the overall and long\u00ad term impact of an intervention, i.e., overall changes in the environment that DDR aims to influence. Impact indicators often use a composite set (or group) of indicators, each of which provides information on the size, sustainability and consequences of a change brought about by a DDR intervention. Such indicators can include both quan\u00ad titative variables (e.g., change in homicide levels or incidence of violence) or qualitative variables (e.g., behavioural change among reintegrated ex\u00adcombatants, social cohesion, etc.). Impact indicators depend on comprehensive and reliable baseline data, and should be as specific in possible in order to isolate the impact of DDR on complex social and economic dynamics from other factors and processes; \\n Proxy indicators: Cost, complexity and\/or the timeliness of data collection may prevent a result from being measured directly. In this case, proxy indicators \u2014 which are variables that substitute for others that are difficult to measure directly \u2014 may reveal performance trends and make managers aware of potential problems or areas of success. This is often the case for outcomes in behavioural change, social cohesion and other results that are difficult to measure.", + "Paragraph": "Indicators are variables (i.e., factors that can change, e.g., number of weapons collected) that should be measured to reveal progress (or lack thereof) towards the achievement of objectives, outcomes or outputs, and should provide information on what has been achieved in either quantitative or qualitative terms, or changes over time. In order for indicators to be meaningful, measurement must be made against a baseline, or baseline data, both of which are collected either in the context of the pre\u00adprogramme comprehensive assessment or during programme implementation. In general, most indicators should be developed together with the definition of programme activities, outputs, outcomes, objectives and goals. In general, indicators can be classified as follows: \n Performance indicator: A particular characteristic or dimension used to measure intended changes defined by a programme results framework. Performance indicators are used to observe progress and to measure actual outputs and outcomes compared to those that were expected. They indicate \u2018how, \u2018whether\u2019 or \u2018to what extent\u2019 a unit is pro\u00ad gressing towards its objectives, rather than \u2018why\u2019 or \u2018why not\u2019 such progress is being made. Performance indicators are usually expressed in quantifiable terms, and should be objective and measurable (e.g., numeric values, percentages, scores and indices); \n Impact indicator: A variable or set of variables used to measure the overall and long\u00ad term impact of an intervention, i.e., overall changes in the environment that DDR aims to influence. Impact indicators often use a composite set (or group) of indicators, each of which provides information on the size, sustainability and consequences of a change brought about by a DDR intervention. Such indicators can include both quan\u00ad titative variables (e.g., change in homicide levels or incidence of violence) or qualitative variables (e.g., behavioural change among reintegrated ex\u00adcombatants, social cohesion, etc.). Impact indicators depend on comprehensive and reliable baseline data, and should be as specific in possible in order to isolate the impact of DDR on complex social and economic dynamics from other factors and processes; \n Proxy indicators: Cost, complexity and\/or the timeliness of data collection may prevent a result from being measured directly. In this case, proxy indicators \u2014 which are variables that substitute for others that are difficult to measure directly \u2014 may reveal performance trends and make managers aware of potential problems or areas of success. This is often the case for outcomes in behavioural change, social cohesion and other results that are difficult to measure.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -65532,14 +65532,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.4. Development of M&E indicators", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Impact indicators depend on comprehensive and reliable baseline data, and should be as specific in possible in order to isolate the impact of DDR on complex social and economic dynamics from other factors and processes; \\n Proxy indicators: Cost, complexity and\/or the timeliness of data collection may prevent a result from being measured directly.", + "Sentence": "Impact indicators depend on comprehensive and reliable baseline data, and should be as specific in possible in order to isolate the impact of DDR on complex social and economic dynamics from other factors and processes; \n Proxy indicators: Cost, complexity and\/or the timeliness of data collection may prevent a result from being measured directly.", "newParagraph": "indicator variable ie factor change eg number weapon collected measured reveal progress lack thereof towards achievement objective outcome output provide information achieved either quantitative qualitative term change time order indicator meaningful measurement must made baseline baseline data collected either context pre programme comprehensive assessment programme implementation general indicator developed together definition programme activity output outcome objective goal general indicator classified follows n performance indicator particular characteristic dimension used measure intended change defined programme result framework performance indicator used observe progress measure actual output outcome compared expected indicate whether extent unit pro gressing towards objective rather progress made performance indicator usually expressed quantifiable term objective measurable eg numeric value percentage score index n impact indicator variable set variable used measure overall long term impact intervention ie overall change environment ddr aim influence impact indicator often use composite set group indicator provides information size sustainability consequence change brought ddr intervention indicator include quan titative variable eg change homicide level incidence violence qualitative variable eg behavioural change among reintegrated ex combatant social cohesion etc impact indicator depend comprehensive reliable baseline data specific possible order isolate impact ddr complex social economic dynamic factor process n proxy indicator cost complexity andor timeliness data collection may prevent result measured directly case proxy indicator variable substitute others difficult measure directly may reveal performance trend make manager aware potential problem area success often case outcome behavioural change social cohesion result difficult measure", "ProcessedSent": "impact indicator depend comprehensive reliable baseline data specific possible order isolate impact ddr complex social economic dynamic factor process n proxy indicator cost complexity andor timeliness data collection may prevent result measured directly", "SentID": 3640 }, { "ParagraphID": 1180, - "Paragraph": "Indicators are variables (i.e., factors that can change, e.g., number of weapons collected) that should be measured to reveal progress (or lack thereof) towards the achievement of objectives, outcomes or outputs, and should provide information on what has been achieved in either quantitative or qualitative terms, or changes over time. In order for indicators to be meaningful, measurement must be made against a baseline, or baseline data, both of which are collected either in the context of the pre\u00adprogramme comprehensive assessment or during programme implementation. In general, most indicators should be developed together with the definition of programme activities, outputs, outcomes, objectives and goals. In general, indicators can be classified as follows: \\n Performance indicator: A particular characteristic or dimension used to measure intended changes defined by a programme results framework. Performance indicators are used to observe progress and to measure actual outputs and outcomes compared to those that were expected. They indicate \u2018how, \u2018whether\u2019 or \u2018to what extent\u2019 a unit is pro\u00ad gressing towards its objectives, rather than \u2018why\u2019 or \u2018why not\u2019 such progress is being made. Performance indicators are usually expressed in quantifiable terms, and should be objective and measurable (e.g., numeric values, percentages, scores and indices); \\n Impact indicator: A variable or set of variables used to measure the overall and long\u00ad term impact of an intervention, i.e., overall changes in the environment that DDR aims to influence. Impact indicators often use a composite set (or group) of indicators, each of which provides information on the size, sustainability and consequences of a change brought about by a DDR intervention. Such indicators can include both quan\u00ad titative variables (e.g., change in homicide levels or incidence of violence) or qualitative variables (e.g., behavioural change among reintegrated ex\u00adcombatants, social cohesion, etc.). Impact indicators depend on comprehensive and reliable baseline data, and should be as specific in possible in order to isolate the impact of DDR on complex social and economic dynamics from other factors and processes; \\n Proxy indicators: Cost, complexity and\/or the timeliness of data collection may prevent a result from being measured directly. In this case, proxy indicators \u2014 which are variables that substitute for others that are difficult to measure directly \u2014 may reveal performance trends and make managers aware of potential problems or areas of success. This is often the case for outcomes in behavioural change, social cohesion and other results that are difficult to measure.", + "Paragraph": "Indicators are variables (i.e., factors that can change, e.g., number of weapons collected) that should be measured to reveal progress (or lack thereof) towards the achievement of objectives, outcomes or outputs, and should provide information on what has been achieved in either quantitative or qualitative terms, or changes over time. In order for indicators to be meaningful, measurement must be made against a baseline, or baseline data, both of which are collected either in the context of the pre\u00adprogramme comprehensive assessment or during programme implementation. In general, most indicators should be developed together with the definition of programme activities, outputs, outcomes, objectives and goals. In general, indicators can be classified as follows: \n Performance indicator: A particular characteristic or dimension used to measure intended changes defined by a programme results framework. Performance indicators are used to observe progress and to measure actual outputs and outcomes compared to those that were expected. They indicate \u2018how, \u2018whether\u2019 or \u2018to what extent\u2019 a unit is pro\u00ad gressing towards its objectives, rather than \u2018why\u2019 or \u2018why not\u2019 such progress is being made. Performance indicators are usually expressed in quantifiable terms, and should be objective and measurable (e.g., numeric values, percentages, scores and indices); \n Impact indicator: A variable or set of variables used to measure the overall and long\u00ad term impact of an intervention, i.e., overall changes in the environment that DDR aims to influence. Impact indicators often use a composite set (or group) of indicators, each of which provides information on the size, sustainability and consequences of a change brought about by a DDR intervention. Such indicators can include both quan\u00ad titative variables (e.g., change in homicide levels or incidence of violence) or qualitative variables (e.g., behavioural change among reintegrated ex\u00adcombatants, social cohesion, etc.). Impact indicators depend on comprehensive and reliable baseline data, and should be as specific in possible in order to isolate the impact of DDR on complex social and economic dynamics from other factors and processes; \n Proxy indicators: Cost, complexity and\/or the timeliness of data collection may prevent a result from being measured directly. In this case, proxy indicators \u2014 which are variables that substitute for others that are difficult to measure directly \u2014 may reveal performance trends and make managers aware of potential problems or areas of success. This is often the case for outcomes in behavioural change, social cohesion and other results that are difficult to measure.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -65557,7 +65557,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1180, - "Paragraph": "Indicators are variables (i.e., factors that can change, e.g., number of weapons collected) that should be measured to reveal progress (or lack thereof) towards the achievement of objectives, outcomes or outputs, and should provide information on what has been achieved in either quantitative or qualitative terms, or changes over time. In order for indicators to be meaningful, measurement must be made against a baseline, or baseline data, both of which are collected either in the context of the pre\u00adprogramme comprehensive assessment or during programme implementation. In general, most indicators should be developed together with the definition of programme activities, outputs, outcomes, objectives and goals. In general, indicators can be classified as follows: \\n Performance indicator: A particular characteristic or dimension used to measure intended changes defined by a programme results framework. Performance indicators are used to observe progress and to measure actual outputs and outcomes compared to those that were expected. They indicate \u2018how, \u2018whether\u2019 or \u2018to what extent\u2019 a unit is pro\u00ad gressing towards its objectives, rather than \u2018why\u2019 or \u2018why not\u2019 such progress is being made. Performance indicators are usually expressed in quantifiable terms, and should be objective and measurable (e.g., numeric values, percentages, scores and indices); \\n Impact indicator: A variable or set of variables used to measure the overall and long\u00ad term impact of an intervention, i.e., overall changes in the environment that DDR aims to influence. Impact indicators often use a composite set (or group) of indicators, each of which provides information on the size, sustainability and consequences of a change brought about by a DDR intervention. Such indicators can include both quan\u00ad titative variables (e.g., change in homicide levels or incidence of violence) or qualitative variables (e.g., behavioural change among reintegrated ex\u00adcombatants, social cohesion, etc.). Impact indicators depend on comprehensive and reliable baseline data, and should be as specific in possible in order to isolate the impact of DDR on complex social and economic dynamics from other factors and processes; \\n Proxy indicators: Cost, complexity and\/or the timeliness of data collection may prevent a result from being measured directly. In this case, proxy indicators \u2014 which are variables that substitute for others that are difficult to measure directly \u2014 may reveal performance trends and make managers aware of potential problems or areas of success. This is often the case for outcomes in behavioural change, social cohesion and other results that are difficult to measure.", + "Paragraph": "Indicators are variables (i.e., factors that can change, e.g., number of weapons collected) that should be measured to reveal progress (or lack thereof) towards the achievement of objectives, outcomes or outputs, and should provide information on what has been achieved in either quantitative or qualitative terms, or changes over time. In order for indicators to be meaningful, measurement must be made against a baseline, or baseline data, both of which are collected either in the context of the pre\u00adprogramme comprehensive assessment or during programme implementation. In general, most indicators should be developed together with the definition of programme activities, outputs, outcomes, objectives and goals. In general, indicators can be classified as follows: \n Performance indicator: A particular characteristic or dimension used to measure intended changes defined by a programme results framework. Performance indicators are used to observe progress and to measure actual outputs and outcomes compared to those that were expected. They indicate \u2018how, \u2018whether\u2019 or \u2018to what extent\u2019 a unit is pro\u00ad gressing towards its objectives, rather than \u2018why\u2019 or \u2018why not\u2019 such progress is being made. Performance indicators are usually expressed in quantifiable terms, and should be objective and measurable (e.g., numeric values, percentages, scores and indices); \n Impact indicator: A variable or set of variables used to measure the overall and long\u00ad term impact of an intervention, i.e., overall changes in the environment that DDR aims to influence. Impact indicators often use a composite set (or group) of indicators, each of which provides information on the size, sustainability and consequences of a change brought about by a DDR intervention. Such indicators can include both quan\u00ad titative variables (e.g., change in homicide levels or incidence of violence) or qualitative variables (e.g., behavioural change among reintegrated ex\u00adcombatants, social cohesion, etc.). Impact indicators depend on comprehensive and reliable baseline data, and should be as specific in possible in order to isolate the impact of DDR on complex social and economic dynamics from other factors and processes; \n Proxy indicators: Cost, complexity and\/or the timeliness of data collection may prevent a result from being measured directly. In this case, proxy indicators \u2014 which are variables that substitute for others that are difficult to measure directly \u2014 may reveal performance trends and make managers aware of potential problems or areas of success. This is often the case for outcomes in behavioural change, social cohesion and other results that are difficult to measure.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -65665,7 +65665,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1183, - "Paragraph": "Three types of monitoring mechanisms and tools can be identified, which should be planned as part of the overall M&E work plan: \\n reporting\/analysis, which entails obtaining and analysing documentation from the project that provides information on progress; \\n validation, which involves checking or verifying whether or not the reported progress is accurate; \\n participation, which involves obtaining feedback from partners and participants on pro\u00ad gress and proposed actions.", + "Paragraph": "Three types of monitoring mechanisms and tools can be identified, which should be planned as part of the overall M&E work plan: \n reporting\/analysis, which entails obtaining and analysing documentation from the project that provides information on progress; \n validation, which involves checking or verifying whether or not the reported progress is accurate; \n participation, which involves obtaining feedback from partners and participants on pro\u00ad gress and proposed actions.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -65676,7 +65676,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.1. Monitoring mechanisms and tools", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Three types of monitoring mechanisms and tools can be identified, which should be planned as part of the overall M&E work plan: \\n reporting\/analysis, which entails obtaining and analysing documentation from the project that provides information on progress; \\n validation, which involves checking or verifying whether or not the reported progress is accurate; \\n participation, which involves obtaining feedback from partners and participants on pro\u00ad gress and proposed actions.", + "Sentence": "Three types of monitoring mechanisms and tools can be identified, which should be planned as part of the overall M&E work plan: \n reporting\/analysis, which entails obtaining and analysing documentation from the project that provides information on progress; \n validation, which involves checking or verifying whether or not the reported progress is accurate; \n participation, which involves obtaining feedback from partners and participants on pro\u00ad gress and proposed actions.", "newParagraph": "three type monitoring mechanism tool identified planned part overall work plan n reportinganalysis entail obtaining analysing documentation project provides information progress n validation involves checking verifying whether reported progress accurate n participation involves obtaining feedback partner participant pro gress proposed action", "ProcessedSent": "three type monitoring mechanism tool identified planned part overall work plan n reportinganalysis entail obtaining analysing documentation project provides information progress n validation involves checking verifying whether reported progress accurate n participation involves obtaining feedback partner participant pro gress proposed action", "SentID": 3648 @@ -65791,7 +65791,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1186, - "Paragraph": "In general, the results of monitoring activities and tools should be used in three different ways to improve overall programme effectiveness and increase the achievement of objec\u00ad tives and goals: P\\n rogramme management: Monitoring outputs and outcomes for specific components or activities can provide important information about whether programme implementa\u00ad tion is proceeding in accordance with the programme plan and budget. If results indicate that implementation is \u2018off course\u2019, these results provide DDR management with infor\u00ad mation on what corrective action needs to be taken in order to bring implementation back into conformity with the overall programme implementation strategy and work plan. These results are therefore an important management tool; \\n Revision of programme strategy: Monitoring results can also provide information on the relevance or effectiveness of an existing strategy or course of action to produce specific outcomes or achieve key objectives. In certain cases, such results can demonstrate that a given course of action is not producing the intended outcomes and can provide DDR managers with an opportunity to reformulate or revise specific implementation strategies and approaches, and make the corresponding changes to the programme work plan. Examples include types of reintegration assistance that are not viable or appro\u00ad priate to the local context, and that can be corrected before many other ex\u00adcombatants enter similar schemes; \\n Use of resources: Monitoring results can provide important indications about the effi\u00ad ciency with which resources are used to implement activities and achieve outcomes. Given the large scale and number of activities and sub\u00adprojects involved in DDR, overall cost\u00adeffectiveness is an essential element in ensuring that DDR programmes achieve their overall objectives. In this regard, accurate and timely monitoring can enable programme managers to develop more cost\u00adeffective or efficient uses and distri\u00ad bution of resources.", + "Paragraph": "In general, the results of monitoring activities and tools should be used in three different ways to improve overall programme effectiveness and increase the achievement of objec\u00ad tives and goals: P\n rogramme management: Monitoring outputs and outcomes for specific components or activities can provide important information about whether programme implementa\u00ad tion is proceeding in accordance with the programme plan and budget. If results indicate that implementation is \u2018off course\u2019, these results provide DDR management with infor\u00ad mation on what corrective action needs to be taken in order to bring implementation back into conformity with the overall programme implementation strategy and work plan. These results are therefore an important management tool; \n Revision of programme strategy: Monitoring results can also provide information on the relevance or effectiveness of an existing strategy or course of action to produce specific outcomes or achieve key objectives. In certain cases, such results can demonstrate that a given course of action is not producing the intended outcomes and can provide DDR managers with an opportunity to reformulate or revise specific implementation strategies and approaches, and make the corresponding changes to the programme work plan. Examples include types of reintegration assistance that are not viable or appro\u00ad priate to the local context, and that can be corrected before many other ex\u00adcombatants enter similar schemes; \n Use of resources: Monitoring results can provide important indications about the effi\u00ad ciency with which resources are used to implement activities and achieve outcomes. Given the large scale and number of activities and sub\u00adprojects involved in DDR, overall cost\u00adeffectiveness is an essential element in ensuring that DDR programmes achieve their overall objectives. In this regard, accurate and timely monitoring can enable programme managers to develop more cost\u00adeffective or efficient uses and distri\u00ad bution of resources.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -65802,14 +65802,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.3. Use of monitoring results", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "In general, the results of monitoring activities and tools should be used in three different ways to improve overall programme effectiveness and increase the achievement of objec\u00ad tives and goals: P\\n rogramme management: Monitoring outputs and outcomes for specific components or activities can provide important information about whether programme implementa\u00ad tion is proceeding in accordance with the programme plan and budget.", + "Sentence": "In general, the results of monitoring activities and tools should be used in three different ways to improve overall programme effectiveness and increase the achievement of objec\u00ad tives and goals: P\n rogramme management: Monitoring outputs and outcomes for specific components or activities can provide important information about whether programme implementa\u00ad tion is proceeding in accordance with the programme plan and budget.", "newParagraph": "general result monitoring activity tool used three different way improve overall programme effectiveness increase achievement objec tives goal pn rogramme management monitoring output outcome specific component activity provide important information whether programme implementa tion proceeding accordance programme plan budget result indicate implementation course result provide ddr management infor mation corrective action need taken order bring implementation back conformity overall programme implementation strategy work plan result therefore important management tool n revision programme strategy monitoring result also provide information relevance effectiveness existing strategy course action produce specific outcome achieve key objective certain case result demonstrate given course action producing intended outcome provide ddr manager opportunity reformulate revise specific implementation strategy approach make corresponding change programme work plan example include type reintegration assistance viable appro priate local context corrected many ex combatant enter similar scheme n use resource monitoring result provide important indication effi ciency resource used implement activity achieve outcome given large scale number activity sub project involved ddr overall cost effectiveness essential element ensuring ddr programme achieve overall objective regard accurate timely monitoring enable programme manager develop cost effective efficient us distri bution resource", "ProcessedSent": "general result monitoring activity tool used three different way improve overall programme effectiveness increase achievement objec tives goal pn rogramme management monitoring output outcome specific component activity provide important information whether programme implementa tion proceeding accordance programme plan budget", "SentID": 3655 }, { "ParagraphID": 1186, - "Paragraph": "In general, the results of monitoring activities and tools should be used in three different ways to improve overall programme effectiveness and increase the achievement of objec\u00ad tives and goals: P\\n rogramme management: Monitoring outputs and outcomes for specific components or activities can provide important information about whether programme implementa\u00ad tion is proceeding in accordance with the programme plan and budget. If results indicate that implementation is \u2018off course\u2019, these results provide DDR management with infor\u00ad mation on what corrective action needs to be taken in order to bring implementation back into conformity with the overall programme implementation strategy and work plan. These results are therefore an important management tool; \\n Revision of programme strategy: Monitoring results can also provide information on the relevance or effectiveness of an existing strategy or course of action to produce specific outcomes or achieve key objectives. In certain cases, such results can demonstrate that a given course of action is not producing the intended outcomes and can provide DDR managers with an opportunity to reformulate or revise specific implementation strategies and approaches, and make the corresponding changes to the programme work plan. Examples include types of reintegration assistance that are not viable or appro\u00ad priate to the local context, and that can be corrected before many other ex\u00adcombatants enter similar schemes; \\n Use of resources: Monitoring results can provide important indications about the effi\u00ad ciency with which resources are used to implement activities and achieve outcomes. Given the large scale and number of activities and sub\u00adprojects involved in DDR, overall cost\u00adeffectiveness is an essential element in ensuring that DDR programmes achieve their overall objectives. In this regard, accurate and timely monitoring can enable programme managers to develop more cost\u00adeffective or efficient uses and distri\u00ad bution of resources.", + "Paragraph": "In general, the results of monitoring activities and tools should be used in three different ways to improve overall programme effectiveness and increase the achievement of objec\u00ad tives and goals: P\n rogramme management: Monitoring outputs and outcomes for specific components or activities can provide important information about whether programme implementa\u00ad tion is proceeding in accordance with the programme plan and budget. If results indicate that implementation is \u2018off course\u2019, these results provide DDR management with infor\u00ad mation on what corrective action needs to be taken in order to bring implementation back into conformity with the overall programme implementation strategy and work plan. These results are therefore an important management tool; \n Revision of programme strategy: Monitoring results can also provide information on the relevance or effectiveness of an existing strategy or course of action to produce specific outcomes or achieve key objectives. In certain cases, such results can demonstrate that a given course of action is not producing the intended outcomes and can provide DDR managers with an opportunity to reformulate or revise specific implementation strategies and approaches, and make the corresponding changes to the programme work plan. Examples include types of reintegration assistance that are not viable or appro\u00ad priate to the local context, and that can be corrected before many other ex\u00adcombatants enter similar schemes; \n Use of resources: Monitoring results can provide important indications about the effi\u00ad ciency with which resources are used to implement activities and achieve outcomes. Given the large scale and number of activities and sub\u00adprojects involved in DDR, overall cost\u00adeffectiveness is an essential element in ensuring that DDR programmes achieve their overall objectives. In this regard, accurate and timely monitoring can enable programme managers to develop more cost\u00adeffective or efficient uses and distri\u00ad bution of resources.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -65827,7 +65827,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1186, - "Paragraph": "In general, the results of monitoring activities and tools should be used in three different ways to improve overall programme effectiveness and increase the achievement of objec\u00ad tives and goals: P\\n rogramme management: Monitoring outputs and outcomes for specific components or activities can provide important information about whether programme implementa\u00ad tion is proceeding in accordance with the programme plan and budget. If results indicate that implementation is \u2018off course\u2019, these results provide DDR management with infor\u00ad mation on what corrective action needs to be taken in order to bring implementation back into conformity with the overall programme implementation strategy and work plan. These results are therefore an important management tool; \\n Revision of programme strategy: Monitoring results can also provide information on the relevance or effectiveness of an existing strategy or course of action to produce specific outcomes or achieve key objectives. In certain cases, such results can demonstrate that a given course of action is not producing the intended outcomes and can provide DDR managers with an opportunity to reformulate or revise specific implementation strategies and approaches, and make the corresponding changes to the programme work plan. Examples include types of reintegration assistance that are not viable or appro\u00ad priate to the local context, and that can be corrected before many other ex\u00adcombatants enter similar schemes; \\n Use of resources: Monitoring results can provide important indications about the effi\u00ad ciency with which resources are used to implement activities and achieve outcomes. Given the large scale and number of activities and sub\u00adprojects involved in DDR, overall cost\u00adeffectiveness is an essential element in ensuring that DDR programmes achieve their overall objectives. In this regard, accurate and timely monitoring can enable programme managers to develop more cost\u00adeffective or efficient uses and distri\u00ad bution of resources.", + "Paragraph": "In general, the results of monitoring activities and tools should be used in three different ways to improve overall programme effectiveness and increase the achievement of objec\u00ad tives and goals: P\n rogramme management: Monitoring outputs and outcomes for specific components or activities can provide important information about whether programme implementa\u00ad tion is proceeding in accordance with the programme plan and budget. If results indicate that implementation is \u2018off course\u2019, these results provide DDR management with infor\u00ad mation on what corrective action needs to be taken in order to bring implementation back into conformity with the overall programme implementation strategy and work plan. These results are therefore an important management tool; \n Revision of programme strategy: Monitoring results can also provide information on the relevance or effectiveness of an existing strategy or course of action to produce specific outcomes or achieve key objectives. In certain cases, such results can demonstrate that a given course of action is not producing the intended outcomes and can provide DDR managers with an opportunity to reformulate or revise specific implementation strategies and approaches, and make the corresponding changes to the programme work plan. Examples include types of reintegration assistance that are not viable or appro\u00ad priate to the local context, and that can be corrected before many other ex\u00adcombatants enter similar schemes; \n Use of resources: Monitoring results can provide important indications about the effi\u00ad ciency with which resources are used to implement activities and achieve outcomes. Given the large scale and number of activities and sub\u00adprojects involved in DDR, overall cost\u00adeffectiveness is an essential element in ensuring that DDR programmes achieve their overall objectives. In this regard, accurate and timely monitoring can enable programme managers to develop more cost\u00adeffective or efficient uses and distri\u00ad bution of resources.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -65838,14 +65838,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.3. Use of monitoring results", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "These results are therefore an important management tool; \\n Revision of programme strategy: Monitoring results can also provide information on the relevance or effectiveness of an existing strategy or course of action to produce specific outcomes or achieve key objectives.", + "Sentence": "These results are therefore an important management tool; \n Revision of programme strategy: Monitoring results can also provide information on the relevance or effectiveness of an existing strategy or course of action to produce specific outcomes or achieve key objectives.", "newParagraph": "general result monitoring activity tool used three different way improve overall programme effectiveness increase achievement objec tives goal pn rogramme management monitoring output outcome specific component activity provide important information whether programme implementa tion proceeding accordance programme plan budget result indicate implementation course result provide ddr management infor mation corrective action need taken order bring implementation back conformity overall programme implementation strategy work plan result therefore important management tool n revision programme strategy monitoring result also provide information relevance effectiveness existing strategy course action produce specific outcome achieve key objective certain case result demonstrate given course action producing intended outcome provide ddr manager opportunity reformulate revise specific implementation strategy approach make corresponding change programme work plan example include type reintegration assistance viable appro priate local context corrected many ex combatant enter similar scheme n use resource monitoring result provide important indication effi ciency resource used implement activity achieve outcome given large scale number activity sub project involved ddr overall cost effectiveness essential element ensuring ddr programme achieve overall objective regard accurate timely monitoring enable programme manager develop cost effective efficient us distri bution resource", "ProcessedSent": "result therefore important management tool n revision programme strategy monitoring result also provide information relevance effectiveness existing strategy course action produce specific outcome achieve key objective", "SentID": 3657 }, { "ParagraphID": 1186, - "Paragraph": "In general, the results of monitoring activities and tools should be used in three different ways to improve overall programme effectiveness and increase the achievement of objec\u00ad tives and goals: P\\n rogramme management: Monitoring outputs and outcomes for specific components or activities can provide important information about whether programme implementa\u00ad tion is proceeding in accordance with the programme plan and budget. If results indicate that implementation is \u2018off course\u2019, these results provide DDR management with infor\u00ad mation on what corrective action needs to be taken in order to bring implementation back into conformity with the overall programme implementation strategy and work plan. These results are therefore an important management tool; \\n Revision of programme strategy: Monitoring results can also provide information on the relevance or effectiveness of an existing strategy or course of action to produce specific outcomes or achieve key objectives. In certain cases, such results can demonstrate that a given course of action is not producing the intended outcomes and can provide DDR managers with an opportunity to reformulate or revise specific implementation strategies and approaches, and make the corresponding changes to the programme work plan. Examples include types of reintegration assistance that are not viable or appro\u00ad priate to the local context, and that can be corrected before many other ex\u00adcombatants enter similar schemes; \\n Use of resources: Monitoring results can provide important indications about the effi\u00ad ciency with which resources are used to implement activities and achieve outcomes. Given the large scale and number of activities and sub\u00adprojects involved in DDR, overall cost\u00adeffectiveness is an essential element in ensuring that DDR programmes achieve their overall objectives. In this regard, accurate and timely monitoring can enable programme managers to develop more cost\u00adeffective or efficient uses and distri\u00ad bution of resources.", + "Paragraph": "In general, the results of monitoring activities and tools should be used in three different ways to improve overall programme effectiveness and increase the achievement of objec\u00ad tives and goals: P\n rogramme management: Monitoring outputs and outcomes for specific components or activities can provide important information about whether programme implementa\u00ad tion is proceeding in accordance with the programme plan and budget. If results indicate that implementation is \u2018off course\u2019, these results provide DDR management with infor\u00ad mation on what corrective action needs to be taken in order to bring implementation back into conformity with the overall programme implementation strategy and work plan. These results are therefore an important management tool; \n Revision of programme strategy: Monitoring results can also provide information on the relevance or effectiveness of an existing strategy or course of action to produce specific outcomes or achieve key objectives. In certain cases, such results can demonstrate that a given course of action is not producing the intended outcomes and can provide DDR managers with an opportunity to reformulate or revise specific implementation strategies and approaches, and make the corresponding changes to the programme work plan. Examples include types of reintegration assistance that are not viable or appro\u00ad priate to the local context, and that can be corrected before many other ex\u00adcombatants enter similar schemes; \n Use of resources: Monitoring results can provide important indications about the effi\u00ad ciency with which resources are used to implement activities and achieve outcomes. Given the large scale and number of activities and sub\u00adprojects involved in DDR, overall cost\u00adeffectiveness is an essential element in ensuring that DDR programmes achieve their overall objectives. In this regard, accurate and timely monitoring can enable programme managers to develop more cost\u00adeffective or efficient uses and distri\u00ad bution of resources.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -65863,7 +65863,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1186, - "Paragraph": "In general, the results of monitoring activities and tools should be used in three different ways to improve overall programme effectiveness and increase the achievement of objec\u00ad tives and goals: P\\n rogramme management: Monitoring outputs and outcomes for specific components or activities can provide important information about whether programme implementa\u00ad tion is proceeding in accordance with the programme plan and budget. If results indicate that implementation is \u2018off course\u2019, these results provide DDR management with infor\u00ad mation on what corrective action needs to be taken in order to bring implementation back into conformity with the overall programme implementation strategy and work plan. These results are therefore an important management tool; \\n Revision of programme strategy: Monitoring results can also provide information on the relevance or effectiveness of an existing strategy or course of action to produce specific outcomes or achieve key objectives. In certain cases, such results can demonstrate that a given course of action is not producing the intended outcomes and can provide DDR managers with an opportunity to reformulate or revise specific implementation strategies and approaches, and make the corresponding changes to the programme work plan. Examples include types of reintegration assistance that are not viable or appro\u00ad priate to the local context, and that can be corrected before many other ex\u00adcombatants enter similar schemes; \\n Use of resources: Monitoring results can provide important indications about the effi\u00ad ciency with which resources are used to implement activities and achieve outcomes. Given the large scale and number of activities and sub\u00adprojects involved in DDR, overall cost\u00adeffectiveness is an essential element in ensuring that DDR programmes achieve their overall objectives. In this regard, accurate and timely monitoring can enable programme managers to develop more cost\u00adeffective or efficient uses and distri\u00ad bution of resources.", + "Paragraph": "In general, the results of monitoring activities and tools should be used in three different ways to improve overall programme effectiveness and increase the achievement of objec\u00ad tives and goals: P\n rogramme management: Monitoring outputs and outcomes for specific components or activities can provide important information about whether programme implementa\u00ad tion is proceeding in accordance with the programme plan and budget. If results indicate that implementation is \u2018off course\u2019, these results provide DDR management with infor\u00ad mation on what corrective action needs to be taken in order to bring implementation back into conformity with the overall programme implementation strategy and work plan. These results are therefore an important management tool; \n Revision of programme strategy: Monitoring results can also provide information on the relevance or effectiveness of an existing strategy or course of action to produce specific outcomes or achieve key objectives. In certain cases, such results can demonstrate that a given course of action is not producing the intended outcomes and can provide DDR managers with an opportunity to reformulate or revise specific implementation strategies and approaches, and make the corresponding changes to the programme work plan. Examples include types of reintegration assistance that are not viable or appro\u00ad priate to the local context, and that can be corrected before many other ex\u00adcombatants enter similar schemes; \n Use of resources: Monitoring results can provide important indications about the effi\u00ad ciency with which resources are used to implement activities and achieve outcomes. Given the large scale and number of activities and sub\u00adprojects involved in DDR, overall cost\u00adeffectiveness is an essential element in ensuring that DDR programmes achieve their overall objectives. In this regard, accurate and timely monitoring can enable programme managers to develop more cost\u00adeffective or efficient uses and distri\u00ad bution of resources.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -65874,14 +65874,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.3. Use of monitoring results", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Examples include types of reintegration assistance that are not viable or appro\u00ad priate to the local context, and that can be corrected before many other ex\u00adcombatants enter similar schemes; \\n Use of resources: Monitoring results can provide important indications about the effi\u00ad ciency with which resources are used to implement activities and achieve outcomes.", + "Sentence": "Examples include types of reintegration assistance that are not viable or appro\u00ad priate to the local context, and that can be corrected before many other ex\u00adcombatants enter similar schemes; \n Use of resources: Monitoring results can provide important indications about the effi\u00ad ciency with which resources are used to implement activities and achieve outcomes.", "newParagraph": "general result monitoring activity tool used three different way improve overall programme effectiveness increase achievement objec tives goal pn rogramme management monitoring output outcome specific component activity provide important information whether programme implementa tion proceeding accordance programme plan budget result indicate implementation course result provide ddr management infor mation corrective action need taken order bring implementation back conformity overall programme implementation strategy work plan result therefore important management tool n revision programme strategy monitoring result also provide information relevance effectiveness existing strategy course action produce specific outcome achieve key objective certain case result demonstrate given course action producing intended outcome provide ddr manager opportunity reformulate revise specific implementation strategy approach make corresponding change programme work plan example include type reintegration assistance viable appro priate local context corrected many ex combatant enter similar scheme n use resource monitoring result provide important indication effi ciency resource used implement activity achieve outcome given large scale number activity sub project involved ddr overall cost effectiveness essential element ensuring ddr programme achieve overall objective regard accurate timely monitoring enable programme manager develop cost effective efficient us distri bution resource", "ProcessedSent": "example include type reintegration assistance viable appro priate local context corrected many ex combatant enter similar scheme n use resource monitoring result provide important indication effi ciency resource used implement activity achieve outcome", "SentID": 3659 }, { "ParagraphID": 1186, - "Paragraph": "In general, the results of monitoring activities and tools should be used in three different ways to improve overall programme effectiveness and increase the achievement of objec\u00ad tives and goals: P\\n rogramme management: Monitoring outputs and outcomes for specific components or activities can provide important information about whether programme implementa\u00ad tion is proceeding in accordance with the programme plan and budget. If results indicate that implementation is \u2018off course\u2019, these results provide DDR management with infor\u00ad mation on what corrective action needs to be taken in order to bring implementation back into conformity with the overall programme implementation strategy and work plan. These results are therefore an important management tool; \\n Revision of programme strategy: Monitoring results can also provide information on the relevance or effectiveness of an existing strategy or course of action to produce specific outcomes or achieve key objectives. In certain cases, such results can demonstrate that a given course of action is not producing the intended outcomes and can provide DDR managers with an opportunity to reformulate or revise specific implementation strategies and approaches, and make the corresponding changes to the programme work plan. Examples include types of reintegration assistance that are not viable or appro\u00ad priate to the local context, and that can be corrected before many other ex\u00adcombatants enter similar schemes; \\n Use of resources: Monitoring results can provide important indications about the effi\u00ad ciency with which resources are used to implement activities and achieve outcomes. Given the large scale and number of activities and sub\u00adprojects involved in DDR, overall cost\u00adeffectiveness is an essential element in ensuring that DDR programmes achieve their overall objectives. In this regard, accurate and timely monitoring can enable programme managers to develop more cost\u00adeffective or efficient uses and distri\u00ad bution of resources.", + "Paragraph": "In general, the results of monitoring activities and tools should be used in three different ways to improve overall programme effectiveness and increase the achievement of objec\u00ad tives and goals: P\n rogramme management: Monitoring outputs and outcomes for specific components or activities can provide important information about whether programme implementa\u00ad tion is proceeding in accordance with the programme plan and budget. If results indicate that implementation is \u2018off course\u2019, these results provide DDR management with infor\u00ad mation on what corrective action needs to be taken in order to bring implementation back into conformity with the overall programme implementation strategy and work plan. These results are therefore an important management tool; \n Revision of programme strategy: Monitoring results can also provide information on the relevance or effectiveness of an existing strategy or course of action to produce specific outcomes or achieve key objectives. In certain cases, such results can demonstrate that a given course of action is not producing the intended outcomes and can provide DDR managers with an opportunity to reformulate or revise specific implementation strategies and approaches, and make the corresponding changes to the programme work plan. Examples include types of reintegration assistance that are not viable or appro\u00ad priate to the local context, and that can be corrected before many other ex\u00adcombatants enter similar schemes; \n Use of resources: Monitoring results can provide important indications about the effi\u00ad ciency with which resources are used to implement activities and achieve outcomes. Given the large scale and number of activities and sub\u00adprojects involved in DDR, overall cost\u00adeffectiveness is an essential element in ensuring that DDR programmes achieve their overall objectives. In this regard, accurate and timely monitoring can enable programme managers to develop more cost\u00adeffective or efficient uses and distri\u00ad bution of resources.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -65899,7 +65899,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1186, - "Paragraph": "In general, the results of monitoring activities and tools should be used in three different ways to improve overall programme effectiveness and increase the achievement of objec\u00ad tives and goals: P\\n rogramme management: Monitoring outputs and outcomes for specific components or activities can provide important information about whether programme implementa\u00ad tion is proceeding in accordance with the programme plan and budget. If results indicate that implementation is \u2018off course\u2019, these results provide DDR management with infor\u00ad mation on what corrective action needs to be taken in order to bring implementation back into conformity with the overall programme implementation strategy and work plan. These results are therefore an important management tool; \\n Revision of programme strategy: Monitoring results can also provide information on the relevance or effectiveness of an existing strategy or course of action to produce specific outcomes or achieve key objectives. In certain cases, such results can demonstrate that a given course of action is not producing the intended outcomes and can provide DDR managers with an opportunity to reformulate or revise specific implementation strategies and approaches, and make the corresponding changes to the programme work plan. Examples include types of reintegration assistance that are not viable or appro\u00ad priate to the local context, and that can be corrected before many other ex\u00adcombatants enter similar schemes; \\n Use of resources: Monitoring results can provide important indications about the effi\u00ad ciency with which resources are used to implement activities and achieve outcomes. Given the large scale and number of activities and sub\u00adprojects involved in DDR, overall cost\u00adeffectiveness is an essential element in ensuring that DDR programmes achieve their overall objectives. In this regard, accurate and timely monitoring can enable programme managers to develop more cost\u00adeffective or efficient uses and distri\u00ad bution of resources.", + "Paragraph": "In general, the results of monitoring activities and tools should be used in three different ways to improve overall programme effectiveness and increase the achievement of objec\u00ad tives and goals: P\n rogramme management: Monitoring outputs and outcomes for specific components or activities can provide important information about whether programme implementa\u00ad tion is proceeding in accordance with the programme plan and budget. If results indicate that implementation is \u2018off course\u2019, these results provide DDR management with infor\u00ad mation on what corrective action needs to be taken in order to bring implementation back into conformity with the overall programme implementation strategy and work plan. These results are therefore an important management tool; \n Revision of programme strategy: Monitoring results can also provide information on the relevance or effectiveness of an existing strategy or course of action to produce specific outcomes or achieve key objectives. In certain cases, such results can demonstrate that a given course of action is not producing the intended outcomes and can provide DDR managers with an opportunity to reformulate or revise specific implementation strategies and approaches, and make the corresponding changes to the programme work plan. Examples include types of reintegration assistance that are not viable or appro\u00ad priate to the local context, and that can be corrected before many other ex\u00adcombatants enter similar schemes; \n Use of resources: Monitoring results can provide important indications about the effi\u00ad ciency with which resources are used to implement activities and achieve outcomes. Given the large scale and number of activities and sub\u00adprojects involved in DDR, overall cost\u00adeffectiveness is an essential element in ensuring that DDR programmes achieve their overall objectives. In this regard, accurate and timely monitoring can enable programme managers to develop more cost\u00adeffective or efficient uses and distri\u00ad bution of resources.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -65971,7 +65971,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1188, - "Paragraph": "The scope or extent of an evaluation, which determines the range and type of indicators or factors that will be measured and analysed, should be directly linked to the objectives and purpose of the evaluation process, and how its results, conclusions and proposals will be used. In general, the scope of an evaluation varies between evaluations that focus primarily on \u2018impacts\u2019 and those that focus on broader \u2018outcomes\u2019: \\n Outcome evaluations: These focus on examining how a set of related projects, programmes and strategies brought about an anticipated outcome. DDR programmes, for instance, contribute to the consolidation of peace and security, but they are not the sole pro\u00ad gramme or factor that explains progress in achieving (or not achieving) this outcome, owing to the role of other programmes (SSR, police training, peace\u00adbuilding activities, etc.). Outcome evaluations define the specific contribution made by DDR to achieving this goal, or explain how DDR programmes interrelated with other processes to achieve the outcome. In this regard, outcome evaluations are primarily designed for broad comparative or strategic policy purposes. Example of an objective: \u201cto contribute to the consolidation of peace, national security, reconciliation and development through the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of ex\u00adcombatants into civil society\u201d; \\n Impact evaluations: These focus on the overall, longer\u00adterm impact, whether intended or unintended, of a programme. Impact evaluations can focus on the direct impacts of a DDR programme \u2014 e.g., its ability to successfully demobilize entire armies and decrease the potential for a return to conflict \u2014 and its indirect impact in helping to increase economic productivity at the local level, or in attracting ex\u00adcombatants from neighbouring countries where other conflicts are occurring. An example of an objective of a DDR programme is: \u201cto facilitate the development and environment in which ex\u00ad combatants are able to be disarmed, demobilized and reintegrated into their communities of choice and have access to social and economic reintegration opportunities\u201d.", + "Paragraph": "The scope or extent of an evaluation, which determines the range and type of indicators or factors that will be measured and analysed, should be directly linked to the objectives and purpose of the evaluation process, and how its results, conclusions and proposals will be used. In general, the scope of an evaluation varies between evaluations that focus primarily on \u2018impacts\u2019 and those that focus on broader \u2018outcomes\u2019: \n Outcome evaluations: These focus on examining how a set of related projects, programmes and strategies brought about an anticipated outcome. DDR programmes, for instance, contribute to the consolidation of peace and security, but they are not the sole pro\u00ad gramme or factor that explains progress in achieving (or not achieving) this outcome, owing to the role of other programmes (SSR, police training, peace\u00adbuilding activities, etc.). Outcome evaluations define the specific contribution made by DDR to achieving this goal, or explain how DDR programmes interrelated with other processes to achieve the outcome. In this regard, outcome evaluations are primarily designed for broad comparative or strategic policy purposes. Example of an objective: \u201cto contribute to the consolidation of peace, national security, reconciliation and development through the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of ex\u00adcombatants into civil society\u201d; \n Impact evaluations: These focus on the overall, longer\u00adterm impact, whether intended or unintended, of a programme. Impact evaluations can focus on the direct impacts of a DDR programme \u2014 e.g., its ability to successfully demobilize entire armies and decrease the potential for a return to conflict \u2014 and its indirect impact in helping to increase economic productivity at the local level, or in attracting ex\u00adcombatants from neighbouring countries where other conflicts are occurring. An example of an objective of a DDR programme is: \u201cto facilitate the development and environment in which ex\u00ad combatants are able to be disarmed, demobilized and reintegrated into their communities of choice and have access to social and economic reintegration opportunities\u201d.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -65989,7 +65989,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1188, - "Paragraph": "The scope or extent of an evaluation, which determines the range and type of indicators or factors that will be measured and analysed, should be directly linked to the objectives and purpose of the evaluation process, and how its results, conclusions and proposals will be used. In general, the scope of an evaluation varies between evaluations that focus primarily on \u2018impacts\u2019 and those that focus on broader \u2018outcomes\u2019: \\n Outcome evaluations: These focus on examining how a set of related projects, programmes and strategies brought about an anticipated outcome. DDR programmes, for instance, contribute to the consolidation of peace and security, but they are not the sole pro\u00ad gramme or factor that explains progress in achieving (or not achieving) this outcome, owing to the role of other programmes (SSR, police training, peace\u00adbuilding activities, etc.). Outcome evaluations define the specific contribution made by DDR to achieving this goal, or explain how DDR programmes interrelated with other processes to achieve the outcome. In this regard, outcome evaluations are primarily designed for broad comparative or strategic policy purposes. Example of an objective: \u201cto contribute to the consolidation of peace, national security, reconciliation and development through the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of ex\u00adcombatants into civil society\u201d; \\n Impact evaluations: These focus on the overall, longer\u00adterm impact, whether intended or unintended, of a programme. Impact evaluations can focus on the direct impacts of a DDR programme \u2014 e.g., its ability to successfully demobilize entire armies and decrease the potential for a return to conflict \u2014 and its indirect impact in helping to increase economic productivity at the local level, or in attracting ex\u00adcombatants from neighbouring countries where other conflicts are occurring. An example of an objective of a DDR programme is: \u201cto facilitate the development and environment in which ex\u00ad combatants are able to be disarmed, demobilized and reintegrated into their communities of choice and have access to social and economic reintegration opportunities\u201d.", + "Paragraph": "The scope or extent of an evaluation, which determines the range and type of indicators or factors that will be measured and analysed, should be directly linked to the objectives and purpose of the evaluation process, and how its results, conclusions and proposals will be used. In general, the scope of an evaluation varies between evaluations that focus primarily on \u2018impacts\u2019 and those that focus on broader \u2018outcomes\u2019: \n Outcome evaluations: These focus on examining how a set of related projects, programmes and strategies brought about an anticipated outcome. DDR programmes, for instance, contribute to the consolidation of peace and security, but they are not the sole pro\u00ad gramme or factor that explains progress in achieving (or not achieving) this outcome, owing to the role of other programmes (SSR, police training, peace\u00adbuilding activities, etc.). Outcome evaluations define the specific contribution made by DDR to achieving this goal, or explain how DDR programmes interrelated with other processes to achieve the outcome. In this regard, outcome evaluations are primarily designed for broad comparative or strategic policy purposes. Example of an objective: \u201cto contribute to the consolidation of peace, national security, reconciliation and development through the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of ex\u00adcombatants into civil society\u201d; \n Impact evaluations: These focus on the overall, longer\u00adterm impact, whether intended or unintended, of a programme. Impact evaluations can focus on the direct impacts of a DDR programme \u2014 e.g., its ability to successfully demobilize entire armies and decrease the potential for a return to conflict \u2014 and its indirect impact in helping to increase economic productivity at the local level, or in attracting ex\u00adcombatants from neighbouring countries where other conflicts are occurring. An example of an objective of a DDR programme is: \u201cto facilitate the development and environment in which ex\u00ad combatants are able to be disarmed, demobilized and reintegrated into their communities of choice and have access to social and economic reintegration opportunities\u201d.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66000,14 +66000,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1. Establishing evaluation scope", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "In general, the scope of an evaluation varies between evaluations that focus primarily on \u2018impacts\u2019 and those that focus on broader \u2018outcomes\u2019: \\n Outcome evaluations: These focus on examining how a set of related projects, programmes and strategies brought about an anticipated outcome.", + "Sentence": "In general, the scope of an evaluation varies between evaluations that focus primarily on \u2018impacts\u2019 and those that focus on broader \u2018outcomes\u2019: \n Outcome evaluations: These focus on examining how a set of related projects, programmes and strategies brought about an anticipated outcome.", "newParagraph": "scope extent evaluation determines range type indicator factor measured analysed directly linked objective purpose evaluation process result conclusion proposal used general scope evaluation varies evaluation focus primarily impact focus broader outcome n outcome evaluation focus examining set related project programme strategy brought anticipated outcome ddr programme instance contribute consolidation peace security sole pro gramme factor explains progress achieving achieving outcome owing role programme ssr police training peace building activity etc outcome evaluation define specific contribution made ddr achieving goal explain ddr programme interrelated process achieve outcome regard outcome evaluation primarily designed broad comparative strategic policy purpose example objective contribute consolidation peace national security reconciliation development disarmament demobilization reintegration ex combatant civil society n impact evaluation focus overall longer term impact whether intended unintended programme impact evaluation focus direct impact ddr programme eg ability successfully demobilize entire army decrease potential return conflict indirect impact helping increase economic productivity local level attracting ex combatant neighbouring country conflict occurring example objective ddr programme facilitate development environment ex combatant able disarmed demobilized reintegrated community choice access social economic reintegration opportunity ", "ProcessedSent": "general scope evaluation varies evaluation focus primarily impact focus broader outcome n outcome evaluation focus examining set related project programme strategy brought anticipated outcome", "SentID": 3666 }, { "ParagraphID": 1188, - "Paragraph": "The scope or extent of an evaluation, which determines the range and type of indicators or factors that will be measured and analysed, should be directly linked to the objectives and purpose of the evaluation process, and how its results, conclusions and proposals will be used. In general, the scope of an evaluation varies between evaluations that focus primarily on \u2018impacts\u2019 and those that focus on broader \u2018outcomes\u2019: \\n Outcome evaluations: These focus on examining how a set of related projects, programmes and strategies brought about an anticipated outcome. DDR programmes, for instance, contribute to the consolidation of peace and security, but they are not the sole pro\u00ad gramme or factor that explains progress in achieving (or not achieving) this outcome, owing to the role of other programmes (SSR, police training, peace\u00adbuilding activities, etc.). Outcome evaluations define the specific contribution made by DDR to achieving this goal, or explain how DDR programmes interrelated with other processes to achieve the outcome. In this regard, outcome evaluations are primarily designed for broad comparative or strategic policy purposes. Example of an objective: \u201cto contribute to the consolidation of peace, national security, reconciliation and development through the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of ex\u00adcombatants into civil society\u201d; \\n Impact evaluations: These focus on the overall, longer\u00adterm impact, whether intended or unintended, of a programme. Impact evaluations can focus on the direct impacts of a DDR programme \u2014 e.g., its ability to successfully demobilize entire armies and decrease the potential for a return to conflict \u2014 and its indirect impact in helping to increase economic productivity at the local level, or in attracting ex\u00adcombatants from neighbouring countries where other conflicts are occurring. An example of an objective of a DDR programme is: \u201cto facilitate the development and environment in which ex\u00ad combatants are able to be disarmed, demobilized and reintegrated into their communities of choice and have access to social and economic reintegration opportunities\u201d.", + "Paragraph": "The scope or extent of an evaluation, which determines the range and type of indicators or factors that will be measured and analysed, should be directly linked to the objectives and purpose of the evaluation process, and how its results, conclusions and proposals will be used. In general, the scope of an evaluation varies between evaluations that focus primarily on \u2018impacts\u2019 and those that focus on broader \u2018outcomes\u2019: \n Outcome evaluations: These focus on examining how a set of related projects, programmes and strategies brought about an anticipated outcome. DDR programmes, for instance, contribute to the consolidation of peace and security, but they are not the sole pro\u00ad gramme or factor that explains progress in achieving (or not achieving) this outcome, owing to the role of other programmes (SSR, police training, peace\u00adbuilding activities, etc.). Outcome evaluations define the specific contribution made by DDR to achieving this goal, or explain how DDR programmes interrelated with other processes to achieve the outcome. In this regard, outcome evaluations are primarily designed for broad comparative or strategic policy purposes. Example of an objective: \u201cto contribute to the consolidation of peace, national security, reconciliation and development through the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of ex\u00adcombatants into civil society\u201d; \n Impact evaluations: These focus on the overall, longer\u00adterm impact, whether intended or unintended, of a programme. Impact evaluations can focus on the direct impacts of a DDR programme \u2014 e.g., its ability to successfully demobilize entire armies and decrease the potential for a return to conflict \u2014 and its indirect impact in helping to increase economic productivity at the local level, or in attracting ex\u00adcombatants from neighbouring countries where other conflicts are occurring. An example of an objective of a DDR programme is: \u201cto facilitate the development and environment in which ex\u00ad combatants are able to be disarmed, demobilized and reintegrated into their communities of choice and have access to social and economic reintegration opportunities\u201d.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66025,7 +66025,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1188, - "Paragraph": "The scope or extent of an evaluation, which determines the range and type of indicators or factors that will be measured and analysed, should be directly linked to the objectives and purpose of the evaluation process, and how its results, conclusions and proposals will be used. In general, the scope of an evaluation varies between evaluations that focus primarily on \u2018impacts\u2019 and those that focus on broader \u2018outcomes\u2019: \\n Outcome evaluations: These focus on examining how a set of related projects, programmes and strategies brought about an anticipated outcome. DDR programmes, for instance, contribute to the consolidation of peace and security, but they are not the sole pro\u00ad gramme or factor that explains progress in achieving (or not achieving) this outcome, owing to the role of other programmes (SSR, police training, peace\u00adbuilding activities, etc.). Outcome evaluations define the specific contribution made by DDR to achieving this goal, or explain how DDR programmes interrelated with other processes to achieve the outcome. In this regard, outcome evaluations are primarily designed for broad comparative or strategic policy purposes. Example of an objective: \u201cto contribute to the consolidation of peace, national security, reconciliation and development through the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of ex\u00adcombatants into civil society\u201d; \\n Impact evaluations: These focus on the overall, longer\u00adterm impact, whether intended or unintended, of a programme. Impact evaluations can focus on the direct impacts of a DDR programme \u2014 e.g., its ability to successfully demobilize entire armies and decrease the potential for a return to conflict \u2014 and its indirect impact in helping to increase economic productivity at the local level, or in attracting ex\u00adcombatants from neighbouring countries where other conflicts are occurring. An example of an objective of a DDR programme is: \u201cto facilitate the development and environment in which ex\u00ad combatants are able to be disarmed, demobilized and reintegrated into their communities of choice and have access to social and economic reintegration opportunities\u201d.", + "Paragraph": "The scope or extent of an evaluation, which determines the range and type of indicators or factors that will be measured and analysed, should be directly linked to the objectives and purpose of the evaluation process, and how its results, conclusions and proposals will be used. In general, the scope of an evaluation varies between evaluations that focus primarily on \u2018impacts\u2019 and those that focus on broader \u2018outcomes\u2019: \n Outcome evaluations: These focus on examining how a set of related projects, programmes and strategies brought about an anticipated outcome. DDR programmes, for instance, contribute to the consolidation of peace and security, but they are not the sole pro\u00ad gramme or factor that explains progress in achieving (or not achieving) this outcome, owing to the role of other programmes (SSR, police training, peace\u00adbuilding activities, etc.). Outcome evaluations define the specific contribution made by DDR to achieving this goal, or explain how DDR programmes interrelated with other processes to achieve the outcome. In this regard, outcome evaluations are primarily designed for broad comparative or strategic policy purposes. Example of an objective: \u201cto contribute to the consolidation of peace, national security, reconciliation and development through the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of ex\u00adcombatants into civil society\u201d; \n Impact evaluations: These focus on the overall, longer\u00adterm impact, whether intended or unintended, of a programme. Impact evaluations can focus on the direct impacts of a DDR programme \u2014 e.g., its ability to successfully demobilize entire armies and decrease the potential for a return to conflict \u2014 and its indirect impact in helping to increase economic productivity at the local level, or in attracting ex\u00adcombatants from neighbouring countries where other conflicts are occurring. An example of an objective of a DDR programme is: \u201cto facilitate the development and environment in which ex\u00ad combatants are able to be disarmed, demobilized and reintegrated into their communities of choice and have access to social and economic reintegration opportunities\u201d.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66043,7 +66043,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1188, - "Paragraph": "The scope or extent of an evaluation, which determines the range and type of indicators or factors that will be measured and analysed, should be directly linked to the objectives and purpose of the evaluation process, and how its results, conclusions and proposals will be used. In general, the scope of an evaluation varies between evaluations that focus primarily on \u2018impacts\u2019 and those that focus on broader \u2018outcomes\u2019: \\n Outcome evaluations: These focus on examining how a set of related projects, programmes and strategies brought about an anticipated outcome. DDR programmes, for instance, contribute to the consolidation of peace and security, but they are not the sole pro\u00ad gramme or factor that explains progress in achieving (or not achieving) this outcome, owing to the role of other programmes (SSR, police training, peace\u00adbuilding activities, etc.). Outcome evaluations define the specific contribution made by DDR to achieving this goal, or explain how DDR programmes interrelated with other processes to achieve the outcome. In this regard, outcome evaluations are primarily designed for broad comparative or strategic policy purposes. Example of an objective: \u201cto contribute to the consolidation of peace, national security, reconciliation and development through the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of ex\u00adcombatants into civil society\u201d; \\n Impact evaluations: These focus on the overall, longer\u00adterm impact, whether intended or unintended, of a programme. Impact evaluations can focus on the direct impacts of a DDR programme \u2014 e.g., its ability to successfully demobilize entire armies and decrease the potential for a return to conflict \u2014 and its indirect impact in helping to increase economic productivity at the local level, or in attracting ex\u00adcombatants from neighbouring countries where other conflicts are occurring. An example of an objective of a DDR programme is: \u201cto facilitate the development and environment in which ex\u00ad combatants are able to be disarmed, demobilized and reintegrated into their communities of choice and have access to social and economic reintegration opportunities\u201d.", + "Paragraph": "The scope or extent of an evaluation, which determines the range and type of indicators or factors that will be measured and analysed, should be directly linked to the objectives and purpose of the evaluation process, and how its results, conclusions and proposals will be used. In general, the scope of an evaluation varies between evaluations that focus primarily on \u2018impacts\u2019 and those that focus on broader \u2018outcomes\u2019: \n Outcome evaluations: These focus on examining how a set of related projects, programmes and strategies brought about an anticipated outcome. DDR programmes, for instance, contribute to the consolidation of peace and security, but they are not the sole pro\u00ad gramme or factor that explains progress in achieving (or not achieving) this outcome, owing to the role of other programmes (SSR, police training, peace\u00adbuilding activities, etc.). Outcome evaluations define the specific contribution made by DDR to achieving this goal, or explain how DDR programmes interrelated with other processes to achieve the outcome. In this regard, outcome evaluations are primarily designed for broad comparative or strategic policy purposes. Example of an objective: \u201cto contribute to the consolidation of peace, national security, reconciliation and development through the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of ex\u00adcombatants into civil society\u201d; \n Impact evaluations: These focus on the overall, longer\u00adterm impact, whether intended or unintended, of a programme. Impact evaluations can focus on the direct impacts of a DDR programme \u2014 e.g., its ability to successfully demobilize entire armies and decrease the potential for a return to conflict \u2014 and its indirect impact in helping to increase economic productivity at the local level, or in attracting ex\u00adcombatants from neighbouring countries where other conflicts are occurring. An example of an objective of a DDR programme is: \u201cto facilitate the development and environment in which ex\u00ad combatants are able to be disarmed, demobilized and reintegrated into their communities of choice and have access to social and economic reintegration opportunities\u201d.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66061,7 +66061,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1188, - "Paragraph": "The scope or extent of an evaluation, which determines the range and type of indicators or factors that will be measured and analysed, should be directly linked to the objectives and purpose of the evaluation process, and how its results, conclusions and proposals will be used. In general, the scope of an evaluation varies between evaluations that focus primarily on \u2018impacts\u2019 and those that focus on broader \u2018outcomes\u2019: \\n Outcome evaluations: These focus on examining how a set of related projects, programmes and strategies brought about an anticipated outcome. DDR programmes, for instance, contribute to the consolidation of peace and security, but they are not the sole pro\u00ad gramme or factor that explains progress in achieving (or not achieving) this outcome, owing to the role of other programmes (SSR, police training, peace\u00adbuilding activities, etc.). Outcome evaluations define the specific contribution made by DDR to achieving this goal, or explain how DDR programmes interrelated with other processes to achieve the outcome. In this regard, outcome evaluations are primarily designed for broad comparative or strategic policy purposes. Example of an objective: \u201cto contribute to the consolidation of peace, national security, reconciliation and development through the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of ex\u00adcombatants into civil society\u201d; \\n Impact evaluations: These focus on the overall, longer\u00adterm impact, whether intended or unintended, of a programme. Impact evaluations can focus on the direct impacts of a DDR programme \u2014 e.g., its ability to successfully demobilize entire armies and decrease the potential for a return to conflict \u2014 and its indirect impact in helping to increase economic productivity at the local level, or in attracting ex\u00adcombatants from neighbouring countries where other conflicts are occurring. An example of an objective of a DDR programme is: \u201cto facilitate the development and environment in which ex\u00ad combatants are able to be disarmed, demobilized and reintegrated into their communities of choice and have access to social and economic reintegration opportunities\u201d.", + "Paragraph": "The scope or extent of an evaluation, which determines the range and type of indicators or factors that will be measured and analysed, should be directly linked to the objectives and purpose of the evaluation process, and how its results, conclusions and proposals will be used. In general, the scope of an evaluation varies between evaluations that focus primarily on \u2018impacts\u2019 and those that focus on broader \u2018outcomes\u2019: \n Outcome evaluations: These focus on examining how a set of related projects, programmes and strategies brought about an anticipated outcome. DDR programmes, for instance, contribute to the consolidation of peace and security, but they are not the sole pro\u00ad gramme or factor that explains progress in achieving (or not achieving) this outcome, owing to the role of other programmes (SSR, police training, peace\u00adbuilding activities, etc.). Outcome evaluations define the specific contribution made by DDR to achieving this goal, or explain how DDR programmes interrelated with other processes to achieve the outcome. In this regard, outcome evaluations are primarily designed for broad comparative or strategic policy purposes. Example of an objective: \u201cto contribute to the consolidation of peace, national security, reconciliation and development through the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of ex\u00adcombatants into civil society\u201d; \n Impact evaluations: These focus on the overall, longer\u00adterm impact, whether intended or unintended, of a programme. Impact evaluations can focus on the direct impacts of a DDR programme \u2014 e.g., its ability to successfully demobilize entire armies and decrease the potential for a return to conflict \u2014 and its indirect impact in helping to increase economic productivity at the local level, or in attracting ex\u00adcombatants from neighbouring countries where other conflicts are occurring. An example of an objective of a DDR programme is: \u201cto facilitate the development and environment in which ex\u00ad combatants are able to be disarmed, demobilized and reintegrated into their communities of choice and have access to social and economic reintegration opportunities\u201d.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66072,14 +66072,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1. Establishing evaluation scope", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Example of an objective: \u201cto contribute to the consolidation of peace, national security, reconciliation and development through the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of ex\u00adcombatants into civil society\u201d; \\n Impact evaluations: These focus on the overall, longer\u00adterm impact, whether intended or unintended, of a programme.", + "Sentence": "Example of an objective: \u201cto contribute to the consolidation of peace, national security, reconciliation and development through the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of ex\u00adcombatants into civil society\u201d; \n Impact evaluations: These focus on the overall, longer\u00adterm impact, whether intended or unintended, of a programme.", "newParagraph": "scope extent evaluation determines range type indicator factor measured analysed directly linked objective purpose evaluation process result conclusion proposal used general scope evaluation varies evaluation focus primarily impact focus broader outcome n outcome evaluation focus examining set related project programme strategy brought anticipated outcome ddr programme instance contribute consolidation peace security sole pro gramme factor explains progress achieving achieving outcome owing role programme ssr police training peace building activity etc outcome evaluation define specific contribution made ddr achieving goal explain ddr programme interrelated process achieve outcome regard outcome evaluation primarily designed broad comparative strategic policy purpose example objective contribute consolidation peace national security reconciliation development disarmament demobilization reintegration ex combatant civil society n impact evaluation focus overall longer term impact whether intended unintended programme impact evaluation focus direct impact ddr programme eg ability successfully demobilize entire army decrease potential return conflict indirect impact helping increase economic productivity local level attracting ex combatant neighbouring country conflict occurring example objective ddr programme facilitate development environment ex combatant able disarmed demobilized reintegrated community choice access social economic reintegration opportunity ", "ProcessedSent": "example objective contribute consolidation peace national security reconciliation development disarmament demobilization reintegration ex combatant civil society n impact evaluation focus overall longer term impact whether intended unintended programme", "SentID": 3670 }, { "ParagraphID": 1188, - "Paragraph": "The scope or extent of an evaluation, which determines the range and type of indicators or factors that will be measured and analysed, should be directly linked to the objectives and purpose of the evaluation process, and how its results, conclusions and proposals will be used. In general, the scope of an evaluation varies between evaluations that focus primarily on \u2018impacts\u2019 and those that focus on broader \u2018outcomes\u2019: \\n Outcome evaluations: These focus on examining how a set of related projects, programmes and strategies brought about an anticipated outcome. DDR programmes, for instance, contribute to the consolidation of peace and security, but they are not the sole pro\u00ad gramme or factor that explains progress in achieving (or not achieving) this outcome, owing to the role of other programmes (SSR, police training, peace\u00adbuilding activities, etc.). Outcome evaluations define the specific contribution made by DDR to achieving this goal, or explain how DDR programmes interrelated with other processes to achieve the outcome. In this regard, outcome evaluations are primarily designed for broad comparative or strategic policy purposes. Example of an objective: \u201cto contribute to the consolidation of peace, national security, reconciliation and development through the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of ex\u00adcombatants into civil society\u201d; \\n Impact evaluations: These focus on the overall, longer\u00adterm impact, whether intended or unintended, of a programme. Impact evaluations can focus on the direct impacts of a DDR programme \u2014 e.g., its ability to successfully demobilize entire armies and decrease the potential for a return to conflict \u2014 and its indirect impact in helping to increase economic productivity at the local level, or in attracting ex\u00adcombatants from neighbouring countries where other conflicts are occurring. An example of an objective of a DDR programme is: \u201cto facilitate the development and environment in which ex\u00ad combatants are able to be disarmed, demobilized and reintegrated into their communities of choice and have access to social and economic reintegration opportunities\u201d.", + "Paragraph": "The scope or extent of an evaluation, which determines the range and type of indicators or factors that will be measured and analysed, should be directly linked to the objectives and purpose of the evaluation process, and how its results, conclusions and proposals will be used. In general, the scope of an evaluation varies between evaluations that focus primarily on \u2018impacts\u2019 and those that focus on broader \u2018outcomes\u2019: \n Outcome evaluations: These focus on examining how a set of related projects, programmes and strategies brought about an anticipated outcome. DDR programmes, for instance, contribute to the consolidation of peace and security, but they are not the sole pro\u00ad gramme or factor that explains progress in achieving (or not achieving) this outcome, owing to the role of other programmes (SSR, police training, peace\u00adbuilding activities, etc.). Outcome evaluations define the specific contribution made by DDR to achieving this goal, or explain how DDR programmes interrelated with other processes to achieve the outcome. In this regard, outcome evaluations are primarily designed for broad comparative or strategic policy purposes. Example of an objective: \u201cto contribute to the consolidation of peace, national security, reconciliation and development through the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of ex\u00adcombatants into civil society\u201d; \n Impact evaluations: These focus on the overall, longer\u00adterm impact, whether intended or unintended, of a programme. Impact evaluations can focus on the direct impacts of a DDR programme \u2014 e.g., its ability to successfully demobilize entire armies and decrease the potential for a return to conflict \u2014 and its indirect impact in helping to increase economic productivity at the local level, or in attracting ex\u00adcombatants from neighbouring countries where other conflicts are occurring. An example of an objective of a DDR programme is: \u201cto facilitate the development and environment in which ex\u00ad combatants are able to be disarmed, demobilized and reintegrated into their communities of choice and have access to social and economic reintegration opportunities\u201d.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66097,7 +66097,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1188, - "Paragraph": "The scope or extent of an evaluation, which determines the range and type of indicators or factors that will be measured and analysed, should be directly linked to the objectives and purpose of the evaluation process, and how its results, conclusions and proposals will be used. In general, the scope of an evaluation varies between evaluations that focus primarily on \u2018impacts\u2019 and those that focus on broader \u2018outcomes\u2019: \\n Outcome evaluations: These focus on examining how a set of related projects, programmes and strategies brought about an anticipated outcome. DDR programmes, for instance, contribute to the consolidation of peace and security, but they are not the sole pro\u00ad gramme or factor that explains progress in achieving (or not achieving) this outcome, owing to the role of other programmes (SSR, police training, peace\u00adbuilding activities, etc.). Outcome evaluations define the specific contribution made by DDR to achieving this goal, or explain how DDR programmes interrelated with other processes to achieve the outcome. In this regard, outcome evaluations are primarily designed for broad comparative or strategic policy purposes. Example of an objective: \u201cto contribute to the consolidation of peace, national security, reconciliation and development through the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of ex\u00adcombatants into civil society\u201d; \\n Impact evaluations: These focus on the overall, longer\u00adterm impact, whether intended or unintended, of a programme. Impact evaluations can focus on the direct impacts of a DDR programme \u2014 e.g., its ability to successfully demobilize entire armies and decrease the potential for a return to conflict \u2014 and its indirect impact in helping to increase economic productivity at the local level, or in attracting ex\u00adcombatants from neighbouring countries where other conflicts are occurring. An example of an objective of a DDR programme is: \u201cto facilitate the development and environment in which ex\u00ad combatants are able to be disarmed, demobilized and reintegrated into their communities of choice and have access to social and economic reintegration opportunities\u201d.", + "Paragraph": "The scope or extent of an evaluation, which determines the range and type of indicators or factors that will be measured and analysed, should be directly linked to the objectives and purpose of the evaluation process, and how its results, conclusions and proposals will be used. In general, the scope of an evaluation varies between evaluations that focus primarily on \u2018impacts\u2019 and those that focus on broader \u2018outcomes\u2019: \n Outcome evaluations: These focus on examining how a set of related projects, programmes and strategies brought about an anticipated outcome. DDR programmes, for instance, contribute to the consolidation of peace and security, but they are not the sole pro\u00ad gramme or factor that explains progress in achieving (or not achieving) this outcome, owing to the role of other programmes (SSR, police training, peace\u00adbuilding activities, etc.). Outcome evaluations define the specific contribution made by DDR to achieving this goal, or explain how DDR programmes interrelated with other processes to achieve the outcome. In this regard, outcome evaluations are primarily designed for broad comparative or strategic policy purposes. Example of an objective: \u201cto contribute to the consolidation of peace, national security, reconciliation and development through the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of ex\u00adcombatants into civil society\u201d; \n Impact evaluations: These focus on the overall, longer\u00adterm impact, whether intended or unintended, of a programme. Impact evaluations can focus on the direct impacts of a DDR programme \u2014 e.g., its ability to successfully demobilize entire armies and decrease the potential for a return to conflict \u2014 and its indirect impact in helping to increase economic productivity at the local level, or in attracting ex\u00adcombatants from neighbouring countries where other conflicts are occurring. An example of an objective of a DDR programme is: \u201cto facilitate the development and environment in which ex\u00ad combatants are able to be disarmed, demobilized and reintegrated into their communities of choice and have access to social and economic reintegration opportunities\u201d.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66115,7 +66115,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1189, - "Paragraph": "In general, evaluations should be carried out at key points in the programme implementation cycle in order to achieve related yet distinct objectives. Four main categories or types of evaluations can be identified: \\n Formative internal evaluations are primarily conducted in the early phase of programme implementation in order to assess early hypotheses and working assumptions, analyse outcomes from pilot interventions and activities, or verify the viability or relevance of a strategy or set of intended outputs. Such evaluations are valuable mechanisms that allow implementation strategies to be corrected early on in the programme implemen\u00ad tation process by identifying potential problems. This type of evaluation is particularly important for DDR processes, given their complex strategic arrangements and the many different sub\u00adprocesses involved. Most formative internal evaluations can be carried out internally by the M&E officer or unit within a DDR section; \\n Mid-term evaluations are similar to formative internal evaluations, but are usually more comprehensive and strategic in their scope and focus, as opposed to the more diag\u00ad nostic function of the formative type. Mid\u00adterm evaluations are usually intended to provide an assessment of the performance and outcomes of a DDR process for stake\u00ad holders, partners and donors, and to enable policy makers to assess the overall role of DDR in the broader post\u00adconflict context. Mid\u00adterm evaluations can also include early assessments of the overall contribution of a DDR process to achieving broader post\u00ad conflict goals; \\n Terminal evaluations are usually carried out at the end of the programme cycle, and are designed to evaluate the overall outcomes and effectiveness of a DDR strategy and programme, the degree to which their main aims were achieved, and their overall effec\u00ad tiveness in contributing to broader goals. Terminal evaluations usually also try to answer a number of key questions regarding the overall strategic approach and focus of the programme, mainly its relevance, efficiency, sustainability and effectiveness; \\n Ex-post evaluations are usually carried out some time (usually several years) after the end of a DDR programme in order to evaluate the long\u00adterm effectiveness of the programme, mainly the sustainability of its activities and positive outcomes (e.g., the extent to which ex\u00adcombatants remain productively engaged in alternatives to violence or mili\u00ad tary activity) or its direct and indirect impacts on security conditions, prospects for peace\u00adbuilding, and consequences for economic productivity and development. Ex\u00adpost evaluations of DDR programmes can also form part of larger impact evaluations to assess the overall effectiveness of a post\u00adconflict recovery strategy. Both terminal and ex\u00adpost evaluations are valuable mechanisms for identifying key lessons learned and best practice for further policy development and the design of future DDR programmes.", + "Paragraph": "In general, evaluations should be carried out at key points in the programme implementation cycle in order to achieve related yet distinct objectives. Four main categories or types of evaluations can be identified: \n Formative internal evaluations are primarily conducted in the early phase of programme implementation in order to assess early hypotheses and working assumptions, analyse outcomes from pilot interventions and activities, or verify the viability or relevance of a strategy or set of intended outputs. Such evaluations are valuable mechanisms that allow implementation strategies to be corrected early on in the programme implemen\u00ad tation process by identifying potential problems. This type of evaluation is particularly important for DDR processes, given their complex strategic arrangements and the many different sub\u00adprocesses involved. Most formative internal evaluations can be carried out internally by the M&E officer or unit within a DDR section; \n Mid-term evaluations are similar to formative internal evaluations, but are usually more comprehensive and strategic in their scope and focus, as opposed to the more diag\u00ad nostic function of the formative type. Mid\u00adterm evaluations are usually intended to provide an assessment of the performance and outcomes of a DDR process for stake\u00ad holders, partners and donors, and to enable policy makers to assess the overall role of DDR in the broader post\u00adconflict context. Mid\u00adterm evaluations can also include early assessments of the overall contribution of a DDR process to achieving broader post\u00ad conflict goals; \n Terminal evaluations are usually carried out at the end of the programme cycle, and are designed to evaluate the overall outcomes and effectiveness of a DDR strategy and programme, the degree to which their main aims were achieved, and their overall effec\u00ad tiveness in contributing to broader goals. Terminal evaluations usually also try to answer a number of key questions regarding the overall strategic approach and focus of the programme, mainly its relevance, efficiency, sustainability and effectiveness; \n Ex-post evaluations are usually carried out some time (usually several years) after the end of a DDR programme in order to evaluate the long\u00adterm effectiveness of the programme, mainly the sustainability of its activities and positive outcomes (e.g., the extent to which ex\u00adcombatants remain productively engaged in alternatives to violence or mili\u00ad tary activity) or its direct and indirect impacts on security conditions, prospects for peace\u00adbuilding, and consequences for economic productivity and development. Ex\u00adpost evaluations of DDR programmes can also form part of larger impact evaluations to assess the overall effectiveness of a post\u00adconflict recovery strategy. Both terminal and ex\u00adpost evaluations are valuable mechanisms for identifying key lessons learned and best practice for further policy development and the design of future DDR programmes.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66133,7 +66133,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1189, - "Paragraph": "In general, evaluations should be carried out at key points in the programme implementation cycle in order to achieve related yet distinct objectives. Four main categories or types of evaluations can be identified: \\n Formative internal evaluations are primarily conducted in the early phase of programme implementation in order to assess early hypotheses and working assumptions, analyse outcomes from pilot interventions and activities, or verify the viability or relevance of a strategy or set of intended outputs. Such evaluations are valuable mechanisms that allow implementation strategies to be corrected early on in the programme implemen\u00ad tation process by identifying potential problems. This type of evaluation is particularly important for DDR processes, given their complex strategic arrangements and the many different sub\u00adprocesses involved. Most formative internal evaluations can be carried out internally by the M&E officer or unit within a DDR section; \\n Mid-term evaluations are similar to formative internal evaluations, but are usually more comprehensive and strategic in their scope and focus, as opposed to the more diag\u00ad nostic function of the formative type. Mid\u00adterm evaluations are usually intended to provide an assessment of the performance and outcomes of a DDR process for stake\u00ad holders, partners and donors, and to enable policy makers to assess the overall role of DDR in the broader post\u00adconflict context. Mid\u00adterm evaluations can also include early assessments of the overall contribution of a DDR process to achieving broader post\u00ad conflict goals; \\n Terminal evaluations are usually carried out at the end of the programme cycle, and are designed to evaluate the overall outcomes and effectiveness of a DDR strategy and programme, the degree to which their main aims were achieved, and their overall effec\u00ad tiveness in contributing to broader goals. Terminal evaluations usually also try to answer a number of key questions regarding the overall strategic approach and focus of the programme, mainly its relevance, efficiency, sustainability and effectiveness; \\n Ex-post evaluations are usually carried out some time (usually several years) after the end of a DDR programme in order to evaluate the long\u00adterm effectiveness of the programme, mainly the sustainability of its activities and positive outcomes (e.g., the extent to which ex\u00adcombatants remain productively engaged in alternatives to violence or mili\u00ad tary activity) or its direct and indirect impacts on security conditions, prospects for peace\u00adbuilding, and consequences for economic productivity and development. Ex\u00adpost evaluations of DDR programmes can also form part of larger impact evaluations to assess the overall effectiveness of a post\u00adconflict recovery strategy. Both terminal and ex\u00adpost evaluations are valuable mechanisms for identifying key lessons learned and best practice for further policy development and the design of future DDR programmes.", + "Paragraph": "In general, evaluations should be carried out at key points in the programme implementation cycle in order to achieve related yet distinct objectives. Four main categories or types of evaluations can be identified: \n Formative internal evaluations are primarily conducted in the early phase of programme implementation in order to assess early hypotheses and working assumptions, analyse outcomes from pilot interventions and activities, or verify the viability or relevance of a strategy or set of intended outputs. Such evaluations are valuable mechanisms that allow implementation strategies to be corrected early on in the programme implemen\u00ad tation process by identifying potential problems. This type of evaluation is particularly important for DDR processes, given their complex strategic arrangements and the many different sub\u00adprocesses involved. Most formative internal evaluations can be carried out internally by the M&E officer or unit within a DDR section; \n Mid-term evaluations are similar to formative internal evaluations, but are usually more comprehensive and strategic in their scope and focus, as opposed to the more diag\u00ad nostic function of the formative type. Mid\u00adterm evaluations are usually intended to provide an assessment of the performance and outcomes of a DDR process for stake\u00ad holders, partners and donors, and to enable policy makers to assess the overall role of DDR in the broader post\u00adconflict context. Mid\u00adterm evaluations can also include early assessments of the overall contribution of a DDR process to achieving broader post\u00ad conflict goals; \n Terminal evaluations are usually carried out at the end of the programme cycle, and are designed to evaluate the overall outcomes and effectiveness of a DDR strategy and programme, the degree to which their main aims were achieved, and their overall effec\u00ad tiveness in contributing to broader goals. Terminal evaluations usually also try to answer a number of key questions regarding the overall strategic approach and focus of the programme, mainly its relevance, efficiency, sustainability and effectiveness; \n Ex-post evaluations are usually carried out some time (usually several years) after the end of a DDR programme in order to evaluate the long\u00adterm effectiveness of the programme, mainly the sustainability of its activities and positive outcomes (e.g., the extent to which ex\u00adcombatants remain productively engaged in alternatives to violence or mili\u00ad tary activity) or its direct and indirect impacts on security conditions, prospects for peace\u00adbuilding, and consequences for economic productivity and development. Ex\u00adpost evaluations of DDR programmes can also form part of larger impact evaluations to assess the overall effectiveness of a post\u00adconflict recovery strategy. Both terminal and ex\u00adpost evaluations are valuable mechanisms for identifying key lessons learned and best practice for further policy development and the design of future DDR programmes.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66144,14 +66144,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2. Timing and objectives of evaluations", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Four main categories or types of evaluations can be identified: \\n Formative internal evaluations are primarily conducted in the early phase of programme implementation in order to assess early hypotheses and working assumptions, analyse outcomes from pilot interventions and activities, or verify the viability or relevance of a strategy or set of intended outputs.", + "Sentence": "Four main categories or types of evaluations can be identified: \n Formative internal evaluations are primarily conducted in the early phase of programme implementation in order to assess early hypotheses and working assumptions, analyse outcomes from pilot interventions and activities, or verify the viability or relevance of a strategy or set of intended outputs.", "newParagraph": "general evaluation carried key point programme implementation cycle order achieve related yet distinct objective four main category type evaluation identified n formative internal evaluation primarily conducted early phase programme implementation order ass early hypothesis working assumption analyse outcome pilot intervention activity verify viability relevance strategy set intended output evaluation valuable mechanism allow implementation strategy corrected early programme implemen tation process identifying potential problem type evaluation particularly important ddr process given complex strategic arrangement many different sub process involved formative internal evaluation carried internally officer unit within ddr section n midterm evaluation similar formative internal evaluation usually comprehensive strategic scope focus opposed diag nostic function formative type mid term evaluation usually intended provide assessment performance outcome ddr process stake holder partner donor enable policy maker ass overall role ddr broader post conflict context mid term evaluation also include early assessment overall contribution ddr process achieving broader post conflict goal n terminal evaluation usually carried end programme cycle designed evaluate overall outcome effectiveness ddr strategy programme degree main aim achieved overall effec tiveness contributing broader goal terminal evaluation usually also try answer number key question regarding overall strategic approach focus programme mainly relevance efficiency sustainability effectiveness n expost evaluation usually carried time usually several year end ddr programme order evaluate long term effectiveness programme mainly sustainability activity positive outcome eg extent ex combatant remain productively engaged alternative violence mili tary activity direct indirect impact security condition prospect peace building consequence economic productivity development ex post evaluation ddr programme also form part larger impact evaluation ass overall effectiveness post conflict recovery strategy terminal ex post evaluation valuable mechanism identifying key lesson learned best practice policy development design future ddr programme", "ProcessedSent": "four main category type evaluation identified n formative internal evaluation primarily conducted early phase programme implementation order ass early hypothesis working assumption analyse outcome pilot intervention activity verify viability relevance strategy set intended output", "SentID": 3674 }, { "ParagraphID": 1189, - "Paragraph": "In general, evaluations should be carried out at key points in the programme implementation cycle in order to achieve related yet distinct objectives. Four main categories or types of evaluations can be identified: \\n Formative internal evaluations are primarily conducted in the early phase of programme implementation in order to assess early hypotheses and working assumptions, analyse outcomes from pilot interventions and activities, or verify the viability or relevance of a strategy or set of intended outputs. Such evaluations are valuable mechanisms that allow implementation strategies to be corrected early on in the programme implemen\u00ad tation process by identifying potential problems. This type of evaluation is particularly important for DDR processes, given their complex strategic arrangements and the many different sub\u00adprocesses involved. Most formative internal evaluations can be carried out internally by the M&E officer or unit within a DDR section; \\n Mid-term evaluations are similar to formative internal evaluations, but are usually more comprehensive and strategic in their scope and focus, as opposed to the more diag\u00ad nostic function of the formative type. Mid\u00adterm evaluations are usually intended to provide an assessment of the performance and outcomes of a DDR process for stake\u00ad holders, partners and donors, and to enable policy makers to assess the overall role of DDR in the broader post\u00adconflict context. Mid\u00adterm evaluations can also include early assessments of the overall contribution of a DDR process to achieving broader post\u00ad conflict goals; \\n Terminal evaluations are usually carried out at the end of the programme cycle, and are designed to evaluate the overall outcomes and effectiveness of a DDR strategy and programme, the degree to which their main aims were achieved, and their overall effec\u00ad tiveness in contributing to broader goals. Terminal evaluations usually also try to answer a number of key questions regarding the overall strategic approach and focus of the programme, mainly its relevance, efficiency, sustainability and effectiveness; \\n Ex-post evaluations are usually carried out some time (usually several years) after the end of a DDR programme in order to evaluate the long\u00adterm effectiveness of the programme, mainly the sustainability of its activities and positive outcomes (e.g., the extent to which ex\u00adcombatants remain productively engaged in alternatives to violence or mili\u00ad tary activity) or its direct and indirect impacts on security conditions, prospects for peace\u00adbuilding, and consequences for economic productivity and development. Ex\u00adpost evaluations of DDR programmes can also form part of larger impact evaluations to assess the overall effectiveness of a post\u00adconflict recovery strategy. Both terminal and ex\u00adpost evaluations are valuable mechanisms for identifying key lessons learned and best practice for further policy development and the design of future DDR programmes.", + "Paragraph": "In general, evaluations should be carried out at key points in the programme implementation cycle in order to achieve related yet distinct objectives. Four main categories or types of evaluations can be identified: \n Formative internal evaluations are primarily conducted in the early phase of programme implementation in order to assess early hypotheses and working assumptions, analyse outcomes from pilot interventions and activities, or verify the viability or relevance of a strategy or set of intended outputs. Such evaluations are valuable mechanisms that allow implementation strategies to be corrected early on in the programme implemen\u00ad tation process by identifying potential problems. This type of evaluation is particularly important for DDR processes, given their complex strategic arrangements and the many different sub\u00adprocesses involved. Most formative internal evaluations can be carried out internally by the M&E officer or unit within a DDR section; \n Mid-term evaluations are similar to formative internal evaluations, but are usually more comprehensive and strategic in their scope and focus, as opposed to the more diag\u00ad nostic function of the formative type. Mid\u00adterm evaluations are usually intended to provide an assessment of the performance and outcomes of a DDR process for stake\u00ad holders, partners and donors, and to enable policy makers to assess the overall role of DDR in the broader post\u00adconflict context. Mid\u00adterm evaluations can also include early assessments of the overall contribution of a DDR process to achieving broader post\u00ad conflict goals; \n Terminal evaluations are usually carried out at the end of the programme cycle, and are designed to evaluate the overall outcomes and effectiveness of a DDR strategy and programme, the degree to which their main aims were achieved, and their overall effec\u00ad tiveness in contributing to broader goals. Terminal evaluations usually also try to answer a number of key questions regarding the overall strategic approach and focus of the programme, mainly its relevance, efficiency, sustainability and effectiveness; \n Ex-post evaluations are usually carried out some time (usually several years) after the end of a DDR programme in order to evaluate the long\u00adterm effectiveness of the programme, mainly the sustainability of its activities and positive outcomes (e.g., the extent to which ex\u00adcombatants remain productively engaged in alternatives to violence or mili\u00ad tary activity) or its direct and indirect impacts on security conditions, prospects for peace\u00adbuilding, and consequences for economic productivity and development. Ex\u00adpost evaluations of DDR programmes can also form part of larger impact evaluations to assess the overall effectiveness of a post\u00adconflict recovery strategy. Both terminal and ex\u00adpost evaluations are valuable mechanisms for identifying key lessons learned and best practice for further policy development and the design of future DDR programmes.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66169,7 +66169,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1189, - "Paragraph": "In general, evaluations should be carried out at key points in the programme implementation cycle in order to achieve related yet distinct objectives. Four main categories or types of evaluations can be identified: \\n Formative internal evaluations are primarily conducted in the early phase of programme implementation in order to assess early hypotheses and working assumptions, analyse outcomes from pilot interventions and activities, or verify the viability or relevance of a strategy or set of intended outputs. Such evaluations are valuable mechanisms that allow implementation strategies to be corrected early on in the programme implemen\u00ad tation process by identifying potential problems. This type of evaluation is particularly important for DDR processes, given their complex strategic arrangements and the many different sub\u00adprocesses involved. Most formative internal evaluations can be carried out internally by the M&E officer or unit within a DDR section; \\n Mid-term evaluations are similar to formative internal evaluations, but are usually more comprehensive and strategic in their scope and focus, as opposed to the more diag\u00ad nostic function of the formative type. Mid\u00adterm evaluations are usually intended to provide an assessment of the performance and outcomes of a DDR process for stake\u00ad holders, partners and donors, and to enable policy makers to assess the overall role of DDR in the broader post\u00adconflict context. Mid\u00adterm evaluations can also include early assessments of the overall contribution of a DDR process to achieving broader post\u00ad conflict goals; \\n Terminal evaluations are usually carried out at the end of the programme cycle, and are designed to evaluate the overall outcomes and effectiveness of a DDR strategy and programme, the degree to which their main aims were achieved, and their overall effec\u00ad tiveness in contributing to broader goals. Terminal evaluations usually also try to answer a number of key questions regarding the overall strategic approach and focus of the programme, mainly its relevance, efficiency, sustainability and effectiveness; \\n Ex-post evaluations are usually carried out some time (usually several years) after the end of a DDR programme in order to evaluate the long\u00adterm effectiveness of the programme, mainly the sustainability of its activities and positive outcomes (e.g., the extent to which ex\u00adcombatants remain productively engaged in alternatives to violence or mili\u00ad tary activity) or its direct and indirect impacts on security conditions, prospects for peace\u00adbuilding, and consequences for economic productivity and development. Ex\u00adpost evaluations of DDR programmes can also form part of larger impact evaluations to assess the overall effectiveness of a post\u00adconflict recovery strategy. Both terminal and ex\u00adpost evaluations are valuable mechanisms for identifying key lessons learned and best practice for further policy development and the design of future DDR programmes.", + "Paragraph": "In general, evaluations should be carried out at key points in the programme implementation cycle in order to achieve related yet distinct objectives. Four main categories or types of evaluations can be identified: \n Formative internal evaluations are primarily conducted in the early phase of programme implementation in order to assess early hypotheses and working assumptions, analyse outcomes from pilot interventions and activities, or verify the viability or relevance of a strategy or set of intended outputs. Such evaluations are valuable mechanisms that allow implementation strategies to be corrected early on in the programme implemen\u00ad tation process by identifying potential problems. This type of evaluation is particularly important for DDR processes, given their complex strategic arrangements and the many different sub\u00adprocesses involved. Most formative internal evaluations can be carried out internally by the M&E officer or unit within a DDR section; \n Mid-term evaluations are similar to formative internal evaluations, but are usually more comprehensive and strategic in their scope and focus, as opposed to the more diag\u00ad nostic function of the formative type. Mid\u00adterm evaluations are usually intended to provide an assessment of the performance and outcomes of a DDR process for stake\u00ad holders, partners and donors, and to enable policy makers to assess the overall role of DDR in the broader post\u00adconflict context. Mid\u00adterm evaluations can also include early assessments of the overall contribution of a DDR process to achieving broader post\u00ad conflict goals; \n Terminal evaluations are usually carried out at the end of the programme cycle, and are designed to evaluate the overall outcomes and effectiveness of a DDR strategy and programme, the degree to which their main aims were achieved, and their overall effec\u00ad tiveness in contributing to broader goals. Terminal evaluations usually also try to answer a number of key questions regarding the overall strategic approach and focus of the programme, mainly its relevance, efficiency, sustainability and effectiveness; \n Ex-post evaluations are usually carried out some time (usually several years) after the end of a DDR programme in order to evaluate the long\u00adterm effectiveness of the programme, mainly the sustainability of its activities and positive outcomes (e.g., the extent to which ex\u00adcombatants remain productively engaged in alternatives to violence or mili\u00ad tary activity) or its direct and indirect impacts on security conditions, prospects for peace\u00adbuilding, and consequences for economic productivity and development. Ex\u00adpost evaluations of DDR programmes can also form part of larger impact evaluations to assess the overall effectiveness of a post\u00adconflict recovery strategy. Both terminal and ex\u00adpost evaluations are valuable mechanisms for identifying key lessons learned and best practice for further policy development and the design of future DDR programmes.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66187,7 +66187,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1189, - "Paragraph": "In general, evaluations should be carried out at key points in the programme implementation cycle in order to achieve related yet distinct objectives. Four main categories or types of evaluations can be identified: \\n Formative internal evaluations are primarily conducted in the early phase of programme implementation in order to assess early hypotheses and working assumptions, analyse outcomes from pilot interventions and activities, or verify the viability or relevance of a strategy or set of intended outputs. Such evaluations are valuable mechanisms that allow implementation strategies to be corrected early on in the programme implemen\u00ad tation process by identifying potential problems. This type of evaluation is particularly important for DDR processes, given their complex strategic arrangements and the many different sub\u00adprocesses involved. Most formative internal evaluations can be carried out internally by the M&E officer or unit within a DDR section; \\n Mid-term evaluations are similar to formative internal evaluations, but are usually more comprehensive and strategic in their scope and focus, as opposed to the more diag\u00ad nostic function of the formative type. Mid\u00adterm evaluations are usually intended to provide an assessment of the performance and outcomes of a DDR process for stake\u00ad holders, partners and donors, and to enable policy makers to assess the overall role of DDR in the broader post\u00adconflict context. Mid\u00adterm evaluations can also include early assessments of the overall contribution of a DDR process to achieving broader post\u00ad conflict goals; \\n Terminal evaluations are usually carried out at the end of the programme cycle, and are designed to evaluate the overall outcomes and effectiveness of a DDR strategy and programme, the degree to which their main aims were achieved, and their overall effec\u00ad tiveness in contributing to broader goals. Terminal evaluations usually also try to answer a number of key questions regarding the overall strategic approach and focus of the programme, mainly its relevance, efficiency, sustainability and effectiveness; \\n Ex-post evaluations are usually carried out some time (usually several years) after the end of a DDR programme in order to evaluate the long\u00adterm effectiveness of the programme, mainly the sustainability of its activities and positive outcomes (e.g., the extent to which ex\u00adcombatants remain productively engaged in alternatives to violence or mili\u00ad tary activity) or its direct and indirect impacts on security conditions, prospects for peace\u00adbuilding, and consequences for economic productivity and development. Ex\u00adpost evaluations of DDR programmes can also form part of larger impact evaluations to assess the overall effectiveness of a post\u00adconflict recovery strategy. Both terminal and ex\u00adpost evaluations are valuable mechanisms for identifying key lessons learned and best practice for further policy development and the design of future DDR programmes.", + "Paragraph": "In general, evaluations should be carried out at key points in the programme implementation cycle in order to achieve related yet distinct objectives. Four main categories or types of evaluations can be identified: \n Formative internal evaluations are primarily conducted in the early phase of programme implementation in order to assess early hypotheses and working assumptions, analyse outcomes from pilot interventions and activities, or verify the viability or relevance of a strategy or set of intended outputs. Such evaluations are valuable mechanisms that allow implementation strategies to be corrected early on in the programme implemen\u00ad tation process by identifying potential problems. This type of evaluation is particularly important for DDR processes, given their complex strategic arrangements and the many different sub\u00adprocesses involved. Most formative internal evaluations can be carried out internally by the M&E officer or unit within a DDR section; \n Mid-term evaluations are similar to formative internal evaluations, but are usually more comprehensive and strategic in their scope and focus, as opposed to the more diag\u00ad nostic function of the formative type. Mid\u00adterm evaluations are usually intended to provide an assessment of the performance and outcomes of a DDR process for stake\u00ad holders, partners and donors, and to enable policy makers to assess the overall role of DDR in the broader post\u00adconflict context. Mid\u00adterm evaluations can also include early assessments of the overall contribution of a DDR process to achieving broader post\u00ad conflict goals; \n Terminal evaluations are usually carried out at the end of the programme cycle, and are designed to evaluate the overall outcomes and effectiveness of a DDR strategy and programme, the degree to which their main aims were achieved, and their overall effec\u00ad tiveness in contributing to broader goals. Terminal evaluations usually also try to answer a number of key questions regarding the overall strategic approach and focus of the programme, mainly its relevance, efficiency, sustainability and effectiveness; \n Ex-post evaluations are usually carried out some time (usually several years) after the end of a DDR programme in order to evaluate the long\u00adterm effectiveness of the programme, mainly the sustainability of its activities and positive outcomes (e.g., the extent to which ex\u00adcombatants remain productively engaged in alternatives to violence or mili\u00ad tary activity) or its direct and indirect impacts on security conditions, prospects for peace\u00adbuilding, and consequences for economic productivity and development. Ex\u00adpost evaluations of DDR programmes can also form part of larger impact evaluations to assess the overall effectiveness of a post\u00adconflict recovery strategy. Both terminal and ex\u00adpost evaluations are valuable mechanisms for identifying key lessons learned and best practice for further policy development and the design of future DDR programmes.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66198,14 +66198,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2. Timing and objectives of evaluations", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Most formative internal evaluations can be carried out internally by the M&E officer or unit within a DDR section; \\n Mid-term evaluations are similar to formative internal evaluations, but are usually more comprehensive and strategic in their scope and focus, as opposed to the more diag\u00ad nostic function of the formative type.", + "Sentence": "Most formative internal evaluations can be carried out internally by the M&E officer or unit within a DDR section; \n Mid-term evaluations are similar to formative internal evaluations, but are usually more comprehensive and strategic in their scope and focus, as opposed to the more diag\u00ad nostic function of the formative type.", "newParagraph": "general evaluation carried key point programme implementation cycle order achieve related yet distinct objective four main category type evaluation identified n formative internal evaluation primarily conducted early phase programme implementation order ass early hypothesis working assumption analyse outcome pilot intervention activity verify viability relevance strategy set intended output evaluation valuable mechanism allow implementation strategy corrected early programme implemen tation process identifying potential problem type evaluation particularly important ddr process given complex strategic arrangement many different sub process involved formative internal evaluation carried internally officer unit within ddr section n midterm evaluation similar formative internal evaluation usually comprehensive strategic scope focus opposed diag nostic function formative type mid term evaluation usually intended provide assessment performance outcome ddr process stake holder partner donor enable policy maker ass overall role ddr broader post conflict context mid term evaluation also include early assessment overall contribution ddr process achieving broader post conflict goal n terminal evaluation usually carried end programme cycle designed evaluate overall outcome effectiveness ddr strategy programme degree main aim achieved overall effec tiveness contributing broader goal terminal evaluation usually also try answer number key question regarding overall strategic approach focus programme mainly relevance efficiency sustainability effectiveness n expost evaluation usually carried time usually several year end ddr programme order evaluate long term effectiveness programme mainly sustainability activity positive outcome eg extent ex combatant remain productively engaged alternative violence mili tary activity direct indirect impact security condition prospect peace building consequence economic productivity development ex post evaluation ddr programme also form part larger impact evaluation ass overall effectiveness post conflict recovery strategy terminal ex post evaluation valuable mechanism identifying key lesson learned best practice policy development design future ddr programme", "ProcessedSent": "formative internal evaluation carried internally officer unit within ddr section n midterm evaluation similar formative internal evaluation usually comprehensive strategic scope focus opposed diag nostic function formative type", "SentID": 3677 }, { "ParagraphID": 1189, - "Paragraph": "In general, evaluations should be carried out at key points in the programme implementation cycle in order to achieve related yet distinct objectives. Four main categories or types of evaluations can be identified: \\n Formative internal evaluations are primarily conducted in the early phase of programme implementation in order to assess early hypotheses and working assumptions, analyse outcomes from pilot interventions and activities, or verify the viability or relevance of a strategy or set of intended outputs. Such evaluations are valuable mechanisms that allow implementation strategies to be corrected early on in the programme implemen\u00ad tation process by identifying potential problems. This type of evaluation is particularly important for DDR processes, given their complex strategic arrangements and the many different sub\u00adprocesses involved. Most formative internal evaluations can be carried out internally by the M&E officer or unit within a DDR section; \\n Mid-term evaluations are similar to formative internal evaluations, but are usually more comprehensive and strategic in their scope and focus, as opposed to the more diag\u00ad nostic function of the formative type. Mid\u00adterm evaluations are usually intended to provide an assessment of the performance and outcomes of a DDR process for stake\u00ad holders, partners and donors, and to enable policy makers to assess the overall role of DDR in the broader post\u00adconflict context. Mid\u00adterm evaluations can also include early assessments of the overall contribution of a DDR process to achieving broader post\u00ad conflict goals; \\n Terminal evaluations are usually carried out at the end of the programme cycle, and are designed to evaluate the overall outcomes and effectiveness of a DDR strategy and programme, the degree to which their main aims were achieved, and their overall effec\u00ad tiveness in contributing to broader goals. Terminal evaluations usually also try to answer a number of key questions regarding the overall strategic approach and focus of the programme, mainly its relevance, efficiency, sustainability and effectiveness; \\n Ex-post evaluations are usually carried out some time (usually several years) after the end of a DDR programme in order to evaluate the long\u00adterm effectiveness of the programme, mainly the sustainability of its activities and positive outcomes (e.g., the extent to which ex\u00adcombatants remain productively engaged in alternatives to violence or mili\u00ad tary activity) or its direct and indirect impacts on security conditions, prospects for peace\u00adbuilding, and consequences for economic productivity and development. Ex\u00adpost evaluations of DDR programmes can also form part of larger impact evaluations to assess the overall effectiveness of a post\u00adconflict recovery strategy. Both terminal and ex\u00adpost evaluations are valuable mechanisms for identifying key lessons learned and best practice for further policy development and the design of future DDR programmes.", + "Paragraph": "In general, evaluations should be carried out at key points in the programme implementation cycle in order to achieve related yet distinct objectives. Four main categories or types of evaluations can be identified: \n Formative internal evaluations are primarily conducted in the early phase of programme implementation in order to assess early hypotheses and working assumptions, analyse outcomes from pilot interventions and activities, or verify the viability or relevance of a strategy or set of intended outputs. Such evaluations are valuable mechanisms that allow implementation strategies to be corrected early on in the programme implemen\u00ad tation process by identifying potential problems. This type of evaluation is particularly important for DDR processes, given their complex strategic arrangements and the many different sub\u00adprocesses involved. Most formative internal evaluations can be carried out internally by the M&E officer or unit within a DDR section; \n Mid-term evaluations are similar to formative internal evaluations, but are usually more comprehensive and strategic in their scope and focus, as opposed to the more diag\u00ad nostic function of the formative type. Mid\u00adterm evaluations are usually intended to provide an assessment of the performance and outcomes of a DDR process for stake\u00ad holders, partners and donors, and to enable policy makers to assess the overall role of DDR in the broader post\u00adconflict context. Mid\u00adterm evaluations can also include early assessments of the overall contribution of a DDR process to achieving broader post\u00ad conflict goals; \n Terminal evaluations are usually carried out at the end of the programme cycle, and are designed to evaluate the overall outcomes and effectiveness of a DDR strategy and programme, the degree to which their main aims were achieved, and their overall effec\u00ad tiveness in contributing to broader goals. Terminal evaluations usually also try to answer a number of key questions regarding the overall strategic approach and focus of the programme, mainly its relevance, efficiency, sustainability and effectiveness; \n Ex-post evaluations are usually carried out some time (usually several years) after the end of a DDR programme in order to evaluate the long\u00adterm effectiveness of the programme, mainly the sustainability of its activities and positive outcomes (e.g., the extent to which ex\u00adcombatants remain productively engaged in alternatives to violence or mili\u00ad tary activity) or its direct and indirect impacts on security conditions, prospects for peace\u00adbuilding, and consequences for economic productivity and development. Ex\u00adpost evaluations of DDR programmes can also form part of larger impact evaluations to assess the overall effectiveness of a post\u00adconflict recovery strategy. Both terminal and ex\u00adpost evaluations are valuable mechanisms for identifying key lessons learned and best practice for further policy development and the design of future DDR programmes.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66223,7 +66223,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1189, - "Paragraph": "In general, evaluations should be carried out at key points in the programme implementation cycle in order to achieve related yet distinct objectives. Four main categories or types of evaluations can be identified: \\n Formative internal evaluations are primarily conducted in the early phase of programme implementation in order to assess early hypotheses and working assumptions, analyse outcomes from pilot interventions and activities, or verify the viability or relevance of a strategy or set of intended outputs. Such evaluations are valuable mechanisms that allow implementation strategies to be corrected early on in the programme implemen\u00ad tation process by identifying potential problems. This type of evaluation is particularly important for DDR processes, given their complex strategic arrangements and the many different sub\u00adprocesses involved. Most formative internal evaluations can be carried out internally by the M&E officer or unit within a DDR section; \\n Mid-term evaluations are similar to formative internal evaluations, but are usually more comprehensive and strategic in their scope and focus, as opposed to the more diag\u00ad nostic function of the formative type. Mid\u00adterm evaluations are usually intended to provide an assessment of the performance and outcomes of a DDR process for stake\u00ad holders, partners and donors, and to enable policy makers to assess the overall role of DDR in the broader post\u00adconflict context. Mid\u00adterm evaluations can also include early assessments of the overall contribution of a DDR process to achieving broader post\u00ad conflict goals; \\n Terminal evaluations are usually carried out at the end of the programme cycle, and are designed to evaluate the overall outcomes and effectiveness of a DDR strategy and programme, the degree to which their main aims were achieved, and their overall effec\u00ad tiveness in contributing to broader goals. Terminal evaluations usually also try to answer a number of key questions regarding the overall strategic approach and focus of the programme, mainly its relevance, efficiency, sustainability and effectiveness; \\n Ex-post evaluations are usually carried out some time (usually several years) after the end of a DDR programme in order to evaluate the long\u00adterm effectiveness of the programme, mainly the sustainability of its activities and positive outcomes (e.g., the extent to which ex\u00adcombatants remain productively engaged in alternatives to violence or mili\u00ad tary activity) or its direct and indirect impacts on security conditions, prospects for peace\u00adbuilding, and consequences for economic productivity and development. Ex\u00adpost evaluations of DDR programmes can also form part of larger impact evaluations to assess the overall effectiveness of a post\u00adconflict recovery strategy. Both terminal and ex\u00adpost evaluations are valuable mechanisms for identifying key lessons learned and best practice for further policy development and the design of future DDR programmes.", + "Paragraph": "In general, evaluations should be carried out at key points in the programme implementation cycle in order to achieve related yet distinct objectives. Four main categories or types of evaluations can be identified: \n Formative internal evaluations are primarily conducted in the early phase of programme implementation in order to assess early hypotheses and working assumptions, analyse outcomes from pilot interventions and activities, or verify the viability or relevance of a strategy or set of intended outputs. Such evaluations are valuable mechanisms that allow implementation strategies to be corrected early on in the programme implemen\u00ad tation process by identifying potential problems. This type of evaluation is particularly important for DDR processes, given their complex strategic arrangements and the many different sub\u00adprocesses involved. Most formative internal evaluations can be carried out internally by the M&E officer or unit within a DDR section; \n Mid-term evaluations are similar to formative internal evaluations, but are usually more comprehensive and strategic in their scope and focus, as opposed to the more diag\u00ad nostic function of the formative type. Mid\u00adterm evaluations are usually intended to provide an assessment of the performance and outcomes of a DDR process for stake\u00ad holders, partners and donors, and to enable policy makers to assess the overall role of DDR in the broader post\u00adconflict context. Mid\u00adterm evaluations can also include early assessments of the overall contribution of a DDR process to achieving broader post\u00ad conflict goals; \n Terminal evaluations are usually carried out at the end of the programme cycle, and are designed to evaluate the overall outcomes and effectiveness of a DDR strategy and programme, the degree to which their main aims were achieved, and their overall effec\u00ad tiveness in contributing to broader goals. Terminal evaluations usually also try to answer a number of key questions regarding the overall strategic approach and focus of the programme, mainly its relevance, efficiency, sustainability and effectiveness; \n Ex-post evaluations are usually carried out some time (usually several years) after the end of a DDR programme in order to evaluate the long\u00adterm effectiveness of the programme, mainly the sustainability of its activities and positive outcomes (e.g., the extent to which ex\u00adcombatants remain productively engaged in alternatives to violence or mili\u00ad tary activity) or its direct and indirect impacts on security conditions, prospects for peace\u00adbuilding, and consequences for economic productivity and development. Ex\u00adpost evaluations of DDR programmes can also form part of larger impact evaluations to assess the overall effectiveness of a post\u00adconflict recovery strategy. Both terminal and ex\u00adpost evaluations are valuable mechanisms for identifying key lessons learned and best practice for further policy development and the design of future DDR programmes.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66234,14 +66234,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2. Timing and objectives of evaluations", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Mid\u00adterm evaluations can also include early assessments of the overall contribution of a DDR process to achieving broader post\u00ad conflict goals; \\n Terminal evaluations are usually carried out at the end of the programme cycle, and are designed to evaluate the overall outcomes and effectiveness of a DDR strategy and programme, the degree to which their main aims were achieved, and their overall effec\u00ad tiveness in contributing to broader goals.", + "Sentence": "Mid\u00adterm evaluations can also include early assessments of the overall contribution of a DDR process to achieving broader post\u00ad conflict goals; \n Terminal evaluations are usually carried out at the end of the programme cycle, and are designed to evaluate the overall outcomes and effectiveness of a DDR strategy and programme, the degree to which their main aims were achieved, and their overall effec\u00ad tiveness in contributing to broader goals.", "newParagraph": "general evaluation carried key point programme implementation cycle order achieve related yet distinct objective four main category type evaluation identified n formative internal evaluation primarily conducted early phase programme implementation order ass early hypothesis working assumption analyse outcome pilot intervention activity verify viability relevance strategy set intended output evaluation valuable mechanism allow implementation strategy corrected early programme implemen tation process identifying potential problem type evaluation particularly important ddr process given complex strategic arrangement many different sub process involved formative internal evaluation carried internally officer unit within ddr section n midterm evaluation similar formative internal evaluation usually comprehensive strategic scope focus opposed diag nostic function formative type mid term evaluation usually intended provide assessment performance outcome ddr process stake holder partner donor enable policy maker ass overall role ddr broader post conflict context mid term evaluation also include early assessment overall contribution ddr process achieving broader post conflict goal n terminal evaluation usually carried end programme cycle designed evaluate overall outcome effectiveness ddr strategy programme degree main aim achieved overall effec tiveness contributing broader goal terminal evaluation usually also try answer number key question regarding overall strategic approach focus programme mainly relevance efficiency sustainability effectiveness n expost evaluation usually carried time usually several year end ddr programme order evaluate long term effectiveness programme mainly sustainability activity positive outcome eg extent ex combatant remain productively engaged alternative violence mili tary activity direct indirect impact security condition prospect peace building consequence economic productivity development ex post evaluation ddr programme also form part larger impact evaluation ass overall effectiveness post conflict recovery strategy terminal ex post evaluation valuable mechanism identifying key lesson learned best practice policy development design future ddr programme", "ProcessedSent": "mid term evaluation also include early assessment overall contribution ddr process achieving broader post conflict goal n terminal evaluation usually carried end programme cycle designed evaluate overall outcome effectiveness ddr strategy programme degree main aim achieved overall effec tiveness contributing broader goal", "SentID": 3679 }, { "ParagraphID": 1189, - "Paragraph": "In general, evaluations should be carried out at key points in the programme implementation cycle in order to achieve related yet distinct objectives. Four main categories or types of evaluations can be identified: \\n Formative internal evaluations are primarily conducted in the early phase of programme implementation in order to assess early hypotheses and working assumptions, analyse outcomes from pilot interventions and activities, or verify the viability or relevance of a strategy or set of intended outputs. Such evaluations are valuable mechanisms that allow implementation strategies to be corrected early on in the programme implemen\u00ad tation process by identifying potential problems. This type of evaluation is particularly important for DDR processes, given their complex strategic arrangements and the many different sub\u00adprocesses involved. Most formative internal evaluations can be carried out internally by the M&E officer or unit within a DDR section; \\n Mid-term evaluations are similar to formative internal evaluations, but are usually more comprehensive and strategic in their scope and focus, as opposed to the more diag\u00ad nostic function of the formative type. Mid\u00adterm evaluations are usually intended to provide an assessment of the performance and outcomes of a DDR process for stake\u00ad holders, partners and donors, and to enable policy makers to assess the overall role of DDR in the broader post\u00adconflict context. Mid\u00adterm evaluations can also include early assessments of the overall contribution of a DDR process to achieving broader post\u00ad conflict goals; \\n Terminal evaluations are usually carried out at the end of the programme cycle, and are designed to evaluate the overall outcomes and effectiveness of a DDR strategy and programme, the degree to which their main aims were achieved, and their overall effec\u00ad tiveness in contributing to broader goals. Terminal evaluations usually also try to answer a number of key questions regarding the overall strategic approach and focus of the programme, mainly its relevance, efficiency, sustainability and effectiveness; \\n Ex-post evaluations are usually carried out some time (usually several years) after the end of a DDR programme in order to evaluate the long\u00adterm effectiveness of the programme, mainly the sustainability of its activities and positive outcomes (e.g., the extent to which ex\u00adcombatants remain productively engaged in alternatives to violence or mili\u00ad tary activity) or its direct and indirect impacts on security conditions, prospects for peace\u00adbuilding, and consequences for economic productivity and development. Ex\u00adpost evaluations of DDR programmes can also form part of larger impact evaluations to assess the overall effectiveness of a post\u00adconflict recovery strategy. Both terminal and ex\u00adpost evaluations are valuable mechanisms for identifying key lessons learned and best practice for further policy development and the design of future DDR programmes.", + "Paragraph": "In general, evaluations should be carried out at key points in the programme implementation cycle in order to achieve related yet distinct objectives. Four main categories or types of evaluations can be identified: \n Formative internal evaluations are primarily conducted in the early phase of programme implementation in order to assess early hypotheses and working assumptions, analyse outcomes from pilot interventions and activities, or verify the viability or relevance of a strategy or set of intended outputs. Such evaluations are valuable mechanisms that allow implementation strategies to be corrected early on in the programme implemen\u00ad tation process by identifying potential problems. This type of evaluation is particularly important for DDR processes, given their complex strategic arrangements and the many different sub\u00adprocesses involved. Most formative internal evaluations can be carried out internally by the M&E officer or unit within a DDR section; \n Mid-term evaluations are similar to formative internal evaluations, but are usually more comprehensive and strategic in their scope and focus, as opposed to the more diag\u00ad nostic function of the formative type. Mid\u00adterm evaluations are usually intended to provide an assessment of the performance and outcomes of a DDR process for stake\u00ad holders, partners and donors, and to enable policy makers to assess the overall role of DDR in the broader post\u00adconflict context. Mid\u00adterm evaluations can also include early assessments of the overall contribution of a DDR process to achieving broader post\u00ad conflict goals; \n Terminal evaluations are usually carried out at the end of the programme cycle, and are designed to evaluate the overall outcomes and effectiveness of a DDR strategy and programme, the degree to which their main aims were achieved, and their overall effec\u00ad tiveness in contributing to broader goals. Terminal evaluations usually also try to answer a number of key questions regarding the overall strategic approach and focus of the programme, mainly its relevance, efficiency, sustainability and effectiveness; \n Ex-post evaluations are usually carried out some time (usually several years) after the end of a DDR programme in order to evaluate the long\u00adterm effectiveness of the programme, mainly the sustainability of its activities and positive outcomes (e.g., the extent to which ex\u00adcombatants remain productively engaged in alternatives to violence or mili\u00ad tary activity) or its direct and indirect impacts on security conditions, prospects for peace\u00adbuilding, and consequences for economic productivity and development. Ex\u00adpost evaluations of DDR programmes can also form part of larger impact evaluations to assess the overall effectiveness of a post\u00adconflict recovery strategy. Both terminal and ex\u00adpost evaluations are valuable mechanisms for identifying key lessons learned and best practice for further policy development and the design of future DDR programmes.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66252,14 +66252,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2. Timing and objectives of evaluations", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Terminal evaluations usually also try to answer a number of key questions regarding the overall strategic approach and focus of the programme, mainly its relevance, efficiency, sustainability and effectiveness; \\n Ex-post evaluations are usually carried out some time (usually several years) after the end of a DDR programme in order to evaluate the long\u00adterm effectiveness of the programme, mainly the sustainability of its activities and positive outcomes (e.g., the extent to which ex\u00adcombatants remain productively engaged in alternatives to violence or mili\u00ad tary activity) or its direct and indirect impacts on security conditions, prospects for peace\u00adbuilding, and consequences for economic productivity and development.", + "Sentence": "Terminal evaluations usually also try to answer a number of key questions regarding the overall strategic approach and focus of the programme, mainly its relevance, efficiency, sustainability and effectiveness; \n Ex-post evaluations are usually carried out some time (usually several years) after the end of a DDR programme in order to evaluate the long\u00adterm effectiveness of the programme, mainly the sustainability of its activities and positive outcomes (e.g., the extent to which ex\u00adcombatants remain productively engaged in alternatives to violence or mili\u00ad tary activity) or its direct and indirect impacts on security conditions, prospects for peace\u00adbuilding, and consequences for economic productivity and development.", "newParagraph": "general evaluation carried key point programme implementation cycle order achieve related yet distinct objective four main category type evaluation identified n formative internal evaluation primarily conducted early phase programme implementation order ass early hypothesis working assumption analyse outcome pilot intervention activity verify viability relevance strategy set intended output evaluation valuable mechanism allow implementation strategy corrected early programme implemen tation process identifying potential problem type evaluation particularly important ddr process given complex strategic arrangement many different sub process involved formative internal evaluation carried internally officer unit within ddr section n midterm evaluation similar formative internal evaluation usually comprehensive strategic scope focus opposed diag nostic function formative type mid term evaluation usually intended provide assessment performance outcome ddr process stake holder partner donor enable policy maker ass overall role ddr broader post conflict context mid term evaluation also include early assessment overall contribution ddr process achieving broader post conflict goal n terminal evaluation usually carried end programme cycle designed evaluate overall outcome effectiveness ddr strategy programme degree main aim achieved overall effec tiveness contributing broader goal terminal evaluation usually also try answer number key question regarding overall strategic approach focus programme mainly relevance efficiency sustainability effectiveness n expost evaluation usually carried time usually several year end ddr programme order evaluate long term effectiveness programme mainly sustainability activity positive outcome eg extent ex combatant remain productively engaged alternative violence mili tary activity direct indirect impact security condition prospect peace building consequence economic productivity development ex post evaluation ddr programme also form part larger impact evaluation ass overall effectiveness post conflict recovery strategy terminal ex post evaluation valuable mechanism identifying key lesson learned best practice policy development design future ddr programme", "ProcessedSent": "terminal evaluation usually also try answer number key question regarding overall strategic approach focus programme mainly relevance efficiency sustainability effectiveness n expost evaluation usually carried time usually several year end ddr programme order evaluate long term effectiveness programme mainly sustainability activity positive outcome eg extent ex combatant remain productively engaged alternative violence mili tary activity direct indirect impact security condition prospect peace building consequence economic productivity development", "SentID": 3680 }, { "ParagraphID": 1189, - "Paragraph": "In general, evaluations should be carried out at key points in the programme implementation cycle in order to achieve related yet distinct objectives. Four main categories or types of evaluations can be identified: \\n Formative internal evaluations are primarily conducted in the early phase of programme implementation in order to assess early hypotheses and working assumptions, analyse outcomes from pilot interventions and activities, or verify the viability or relevance of a strategy or set of intended outputs. Such evaluations are valuable mechanisms that allow implementation strategies to be corrected early on in the programme implemen\u00ad tation process by identifying potential problems. This type of evaluation is particularly important for DDR processes, given their complex strategic arrangements and the many different sub\u00adprocesses involved. Most formative internal evaluations can be carried out internally by the M&E officer or unit within a DDR section; \\n Mid-term evaluations are similar to formative internal evaluations, but are usually more comprehensive and strategic in their scope and focus, as opposed to the more diag\u00ad nostic function of the formative type. Mid\u00adterm evaluations are usually intended to provide an assessment of the performance and outcomes of a DDR process for stake\u00ad holders, partners and donors, and to enable policy makers to assess the overall role of DDR in the broader post\u00adconflict context. Mid\u00adterm evaluations can also include early assessments of the overall contribution of a DDR process to achieving broader post\u00ad conflict goals; \\n Terminal evaluations are usually carried out at the end of the programme cycle, and are designed to evaluate the overall outcomes and effectiveness of a DDR strategy and programme, the degree to which their main aims were achieved, and their overall effec\u00ad tiveness in contributing to broader goals. Terminal evaluations usually also try to answer a number of key questions regarding the overall strategic approach and focus of the programme, mainly its relevance, efficiency, sustainability and effectiveness; \\n Ex-post evaluations are usually carried out some time (usually several years) after the end of a DDR programme in order to evaluate the long\u00adterm effectiveness of the programme, mainly the sustainability of its activities and positive outcomes (e.g., the extent to which ex\u00adcombatants remain productively engaged in alternatives to violence or mili\u00ad tary activity) or its direct and indirect impacts on security conditions, prospects for peace\u00adbuilding, and consequences for economic productivity and development. Ex\u00adpost evaluations of DDR programmes can also form part of larger impact evaluations to assess the overall effectiveness of a post\u00adconflict recovery strategy. Both terminal and ex\u00adpost evaluations are valuable mechanisms for identifying key lessons learned and best practice for further policy development and the design of future DDR programmes.", + "Paragraph": "In general, evaluations should be carried out at key points in the programme implementation cycle in order to achieve related yet distinct objectives. Four main categories or types of evaluations can be identified: \n Formative internal evaluations are primarily conducted in the early phase of programme implementation in order to assess early hypotheses and working assumptions, analyse outcomes from pilot interventions and activities, or verify the viability or relevance of a strategy or set of intended outputs. Such evaluations are valuable mechanisms that allow implementation strategies to be corrected early on in the programme implemen\u00ad tation process by identifying potential problems. This type of evaluation is particularly important for DDR processes, given their complex strategic arrangements and the many different sub\u00adprocesses involved. Most formative internal evaluations can be carried out internally by the M&E officer or unit within a DDR section; \n Mid-term evaluations are similar to formative internal evaluations, but are usually more comprehensive and strategic in their scope and focus, as opposed to the more diag\u00ad nostic function of the formative type. Mid\u00adterm evaluations are usually intended to provide an assessment of the performance and outcomes of a DDR process for stake\u00ad holders, partners and donors, and to enable policy makers to assess the overall role of DDR in the broader post\u00adconflict context. Mid\u00adterm evaluations can also include early assessments of the overall contribution of a DDR process to achieving broader post\u00ad conflict goals; \n Terminal evaluations are usually carried out at the end of the programme cycle, and are designed to evaluate the overall outcomes and effectiveness of a DDR strategy and programme, the degree to which their main aims were achieved, and their overall effec\u00ad tiveness in contributing to broader goals. Terminal evaluations usually also try to answer a number of key questions regarding the overall strategic approach and focus of the programme, mainly its relevance, efficiency, sustainability and effectiveness; \n Ex-post evaluations are usually carried out some time (usually several years) after the end of a DDR programme in order to evaluate the long\u00adterm effectiveness of the programme, mainly the sustainability of its activities and positive outcomes (e.g., the extent to which ex\u00adcombatants remain productively engaged in alternatives to violence or mili\u00ad tary activity) or its direct and indirect impacts on security conditions, prospects for peace\u00adbuilding, and consequences for economic productivity and development. Ex\u00adpost evaluations of DDR programmes can also form part of larger impact evaluations to assess the overall effectiveness of a post\u00adconflict recovery strategy. Both terminal and ex\u00adpost evaluations are valuable mechanisms for identifying key lessons learned and best practice for further policy development and the design of future DDR programmes.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66277,7 +66277,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1189, - "Paragraph": "In general, evaluations should be carried out at key points in the programme implementation cycle in order to achieve related yet distinct objectives. Four main categories or types of evaluations can be identified: \\n Formative internal evaluations are primarily conducted in the early phase of programme implementation in order to assess early hypotheses and working assumptions, analyse outcomes from pilot interventions and activities, or verify the viability or relevance of a strategy or set of intended outputs. Such evaluations are valuable mechanisms that allow implementation strategies to be corrected early on in the programme implemen\u00ad tation process by identifying potential problems. This type of evaluation is particularly important for DDR processes, given their complex strategic arrangements and the many different sub\u00adprocesses involved. Most formative internal evaluations can be carried out internally by the M&E officer or unit within a DDR section; \\n Mid-term evaluations are similar to formative internal evaluations, but are usually more comprehensive and strategic in their scope and focus, as opposed to the more diag\u00ad nostic function of the formative type. Mid\u00adterm evaluations are usually intended to provide an assessment of the performance and outcomes of a DDR process for stake\u00ad holders, partners and donors, and to enable policy makers to assess the overall role of DDR in the broader post\u00adconflict context. Mid\u00adterm evaluations can also include early assessments of the overall contribution of a DDR process to achieving broader post\u00ad conflict goals; \\n Terminal evaluations are usually carried out at the end of the programme cycle, and are designed to evaluate the overall outcomes and effectiveness of a DDR strategy and programme, the degree to which their main aims were achieved, and their overall effec\u00ad tiveness in contributing to broader goals. Terminal evaluations usually also try to answer a number of key questions regarding the overall strategic approach and focus of the programme, mainly its relevance, efficiency, sustainability and effectiveness; \\n Ex-post evaluations are usually carried out some time (usually several years) after the end of a DDR programme in order to evaluate the long\u00adterm effectiveness of the programme, mainly the sustainability of its activities and positive outcomes (e.g., the extent to which ex\u00adcombatants remain productively engaged in alternatives to violence or mili\u00ad tary activity) or its direct and indirect impacts on security conditions, prospects for peace\u00adbuilding, and consequences for economic productivity and development. Ex\u00adpost evaluations of DDR programmes can also form part of larger impact evaluations to assess the overall effectiveness of a post\u00adconflict recovery strategy. Both terminal and ex\u00adpost evaluations are valuable mechanisms for identifying key lessons learned and best practice for further policy development and the design of future DDR programmes.", + "Paragraph": "In general, evaluations should be carried out at key points in the programme implementation cycle in order to achieve related yet distinct objectives. Four main categories or types of evaluations can be identified: \n Formative internal evaluations are primarily conducted in the early phase of programme implementation in order to assess early hypotheses and working assumptions, analyse outcomes from pilot interventions and activities, or verify the viability or relevance of a strategy or set of intended outputs. Such evaluations are valuable mechanisms that allow implementation strategies to be corrected early on in the programme implemen\u00ad tation process by identifying potential problems. This type of evaluation is particularly important for DDR processes, given their complex strategic arrangements and the many different sub\u00adprocesses involved. Most formative internal evaluations can be carried out internally by the M&E officer or unit within a DDR section; \n Mid-term evaluations are similar to formative internal evaluations, but are usually more comprehensive and strategic in their scope and focus, as opposed to the more diag\u00ad nostic function of the formative type. Mid\u00adterm evaluations are usually intended to provide an assessment of the performance and outcomes of a DDR process for stake\u00ad holders, partners and donors, and to enable policy makers to assess the overall role of DDR in the broader post\u00adconflict context. Mid\u00adterm evaluations can also include early assessments of the overall contribution of a DDR process to achieving broader post\u00ad conflict goals; \n Terminal evaluations are usually carried out at the end of the programme cycle, and are designed to evaluate the overall outcomes and effectiveness of a DDR strategy and programme, the degree to which their main aims were achieved, and their overall effec\u00ad tiveness in contributing to broader goals. Terminal evaluations usually also try to answer a number of key questions regarding the overall strategic approach and focus of the programme, mainly its relevance, efficiency, sustainability and effectiveness; \n Ex-post evaluations are usually carried out some time (usually several years) after the end of a DDR programme in order to evaluate the long\u00adterm effectiveness of the programme, mainly the sustainability of its activities and positive outcomes (e.g., the extent to which ex\u00adcombatants remain productively engaged in alternatives to violence or mili\u00ad tary activity) or its direct and indirect impacts on security conditions, prospects for peace\u00adbuilding, and consequences for economic productivity and development. Ex\u00adpost evaluations of DDR programmes can also form part of larger impact evaluations to assess the overall effectiveness of a post\u00adconflict recovery strategy. Both terminal and ex\u00adpost evaluations are valuable mechanisms for identifying key lessons learned and best practice for further policy development and the design of future DDR programmes.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66295,7 +66295,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1190, - "Paragraph": "Given the broad scope of DDR programmes, and the differences in strategies, objectives and context, it is difficult to identify specific or generic (i.e., general) results or indicators for evaluating DDR programmes. A more meaningful approach is to identify the various types of impacts or issues to be analysed, and to construct composite (i.e., a group of) indi\u00ad cators as part of an overall methodological approach to evaluating the programme. The following factors usually form the basis from which an evaluation\u2019s focus is defined: \\n Relevance describes the extent to which the objectives of a programme or project remain valid and pertinent (relevant) as originally planned, or as modified owing to changing circumstances within the immediate context and external environment of that pro\u00ad gramme or project. Relevance can also include the suitability of a particular strategy or approach for dealing with a specific problem or issue. A DDR\u00adspecific evaluation could focus on the relevance of cantonment\u00adbased demobilization strategies, for instance, in comparison with other approaches (e.g., decentralized registration of combatants) that perhaps could have more effectively achieved the same objectives; \\n Sustainability involves the success of a strategy in continuing to achieve its initial objec\u00ad tives even after the end of a programme, i.e., whether it has a long\u00adlasting effect. In a DDR programme, this is most important in determining the long\u00adterm viability and effectiveness of reintegration assistance and the extent to which it ensures that ex\u00ad combatants remain in civilian life and do not return to military or violence\u00adbased livelihoods. Indicators in such a methodology include the viability of alternative eco\u00ad nomic livelihoods, behavioural change among ex\u00adcombatants, and so forth; \\n Impact includes the immediate and long\u00adterm consequences of an intervention on the place in which it is implemented, and on the lives of those who are assisted or who benefit from the programme. Evaluating the impact of DDR includes focusing on the immediate social and economic effects of the return of ex\u00adcombatants and their inte\u00ad gration into social and economic life, and the attitudes of communities and the specific direct or indirect effects of these on the lives of individuals; \\n Effectiveness measures the extent to which a programme has been successful in achieving its key objectives. The measurement of effectiveness can be quite specific (e.g., the success of a DDR programme in demobilizing and reintegrating the majority of ex\u00ad combatants) or can be defined in broad or strategic terms (e.g., the extent to which a DDR programme has lowered political tensions, reduced levels of insecurity or improved the well\u00adbeing of host communities); \\n Efficiency refers to how well a given DDR programme and strategy transformed inputs into results and outputs. This is a different way of focusing on the impact of a pro\u00ad gramme, because it places more emphasis on how economically resources were used to achieve specific outcomes. In certain cases, a DDR programme might have been successful in demobilizing and reintegrating a significant number of ex\u00adcombatants, and improving the welfare of host communities, but used up a disproportionately large share of resources that could have been better used to assist other groups that were not covered by the programme. In such a case, a lack of programme efficiency limited the potential scope of its impact.", + "Paragraph": "Given the broad scope of DDR programmes, and the differences in strategies, objectives and context, it is difficult to identify specific or generic (i.e., general) results or indicators for evaluating DDR programmes. A more meaningful approach is to identify the various types of impacts or issues to be analysed, and to construct composite (i.e., a group of) indi\u00ad cators as part of an overall methodological approach to evaluating the programme. The following factors usually form the basis from which an evaluation\u2019s focus is defined: \n Relevance describes the extent to which the objectives of a programme or project remain valid and pertinent (relevant) as originally planned, or as modified owing to changing circumstances within the immediate context and external environment of that pro\u00ad gramme or project. Relevance can also include the suitability of a particular strategy or approach for dealing with a specific problem or issue. A DDR\u00adspecific evaluation could focus on the relevance of cantonment\u00adbased demobilization strategies, for instance, in comparison with other approaches (e.g., decentralized registration of combatants) that perhaps could have more effectively achieved the same objectives; \n Sustainability involves the success of a strategy in continuing to achieve its initial objec\u00ad tives even after the end of a programme, i.e., whether it has a long\u00adlasting effect. In a DDR programme, this is most important in determining the long\u00adterm viability and effectiveness of reintegration assistance and the extent to which it ensures that ex\u00ad combatants remain in civilian life and do not return to military or violence\u00adbased livelihoods. Indicators in such a methodology include the viability of alternative eco\u00ad nomic livelihoods, behavioural change among ex\u00adcombatants, and so forth; \n Impact includes the immediate and long\u00adterm consequences of an intervention on the place in which it is implemented, and on the lives of those who are assisted or who benefit from the programme. Evaluating the impact of DDR includes focusing on the immediate social and economic effects of the return of ex\u00adcombatants and their inte\u00ad gration into social and economic life, and the attitudes of communities and the specific direct or indirect effects of these on the lives of individuals; \n Effectiveness measures the extent to which a programme has been successful in achieving its key objectives. The measurement of effectiveness can be quite specific (e.g., the success of a DDR programme in demobilizing and reintegrating the majority of ex\u00ad combatants) or can be defined in broad or strategic terms (e.g., the extent to which a DDR programme has lowered political tensions, reduced levels of insecurity or improved the well\u00adbeing of host communities); \n Efficiency refers to how well a given DDR programme and strategy transformed inputs into results and outputs. This is a different way of focusing on the impact of a pro\u00ad gramme, because it places more emphasis on how economically resources were used to achieve specific outcomes. In certain cases, a DDR programme might have been successful in demobilizing and reintegrating a significant number of ex\u00adcombatants, and improving the welfare of host communities, but used up a disproportionately large share of resources that could have been better used to assist other groups that were not covered by the programme. In such a case, a lack of programme efficiency limited the potential scope of its impact.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66313,7 +66313,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1190, - "Paragraph": "Given the broad scope of DDR programmes, and the differences in strategies, objectives and context, it is difficult to identify specific or generic (i.e., general) results or indicators for evaluating DDR programmes. A more meaningful approach is to identify the various types of impacts or issues to be analysed, and to construct composite (i.e., a group of) indi\u00ad cators as part of an overall methodological approach to evaluating the programme. The following factors usually form the basis from which an evaluation\u2019s focus is defined: \\n Relevance describes the extent to which the objectives of a programme or project remain valid and pertinent (relevant) as originally planned, or as modified owing to changing circumstances within the immediate context and external environment of that pro\u00ad gramme or project. Relevance can also include the suitability of a particular strategy or approach for dealing with a specific problem or issue. A DDR\u00adspecific evaluation could focus on the relevance of cantonment\u00adbased demobilization strategies, for instance, in comparison with other approaches (e.g., decentralized registration of combatants) that perhaps could have more effectively achieved the same objectives; \\n Sustainability involves the success of a strategy in continuing to achieve its initial objec\u00ad tives even after the end of a programme, i.e., whether it has a long\u00adlasting effect. In a DDR programme, this is most important in determining the long\u00adterm viability and effectiveness of reintegration assistance and the extent to which it ensures that ex\u00ad combatants remain in civilian life and do not return to military or violence\u00adbased livelihoods. Indicators in such a methodology include the viability of alternative eco\u00ad nomic livelihoods, behavioural change among ex\u00adcombatants, and so forth; \\n Impact includes the immediate and long\u00adterm consequences of an intervention on the place in which it is implemented, and on the lives of those who are assisted or who benefit from the programme. Evaluating the impact of DDR includes focusing on the immediate social and economic effects of the return of ex\u00adcombatants and their inte\u00ad gration into social and economic life, and the attitudes of communities and the specific direct or indirect effects of these on the lives of individuals; \\n Effectiveness measures the extent to which a programme has been successful in achieving its key objectives. The measurement of effectiveness can be quite specific (e.g., the success of a DDR programme in demobilizing and reintegrating the majority of ex\u00ad combatants) or can be defined in broad or strategic terms (e.g., the extent to which a DDR programme has lowered political tensions, reduced levels of insecurity or improved the well\u00adbeing of host communities); \\n Efficiency refers to how well a given DDR programme and strategy transformed inputs into results and outputs. This is a different way of focusing on the impact of a pro\u00ad gramme, because it places more emphasis on how economically resources were used to achieve specific outcomes. In certain cases, a DDR programme might have been successful in demobilizing and reintegrating a significant number of ex\u00adcombatants, and improving the welfare of host communities, but used up a disproportionately large share of resources that could have been better used to assist other groups that were not covered by the programme. In such a case, a lack of programme efficiency limited the potential scope of its impact.", + "Paragraph": "Given the broad scope of DDR programmes, and the differences in strategies, objectives and context, it is difficult to identify specific or generic (i.e., general) results or indicators for evaluating DDR programmes. A more meaningful approach is to identify the various types of impacts or issues to be analysed, and to construct composite (i.e., a group of) indi\u00ad cators as part of an overall methodological approach to evaluating the programme. The following factors usually form the basis from which an evaluation\u2019s focus is defined: \n Relevance describes the extent to which the objectives of a programme or project remain valid and pertinent (relevant) as originally planned, or as modified owing to changing circumstances within the immediate context and external environment of that pro\u00ad gramme or project. Relevance can also include the suitability of a particular strategy or approach for dealing with a specific problem or issue. A DDR\u00adspecific evaluation could focus on the relevance of cantonment\u00adbased demobilization strategies, for instance, in comparison with other approaches (e.g., decentralized registration of combatants) that perhaps could have more effectively achieved the same objectives; \n Sustainability involves the success of a strategy in continuing to achieve its initial objec\u00ad tives even after the end of a programme, i.e., whether it has a long\u00adlasting effect. In a DDR programme, this is most important in determining the long\u00adterm viability and effectiveness of reintegration assistance and the extent to which it ensures that ex\u00ad combatants remain in civilian life and do not return to military or violence\u00adbased livelihoods. Indicators in such a methodology include the viability of alternative eco\u00ad nomic livelihoods, behavioural change among ex\u00adcombatants, and so forth; \n Impact includes the immediate and long\u00adterm consequences of an intervention on the place in which it is implemented, and on the lives of those who are assisted or who benefit from the programme. Evaluating the impact of DDR includes focusing on the immediate social and economic effects of the return of ex\u00adcombatants and their inte\u00ad gration into social and economic life, and the attitudes of communities and the specific direct or indirect effects of these on the lives of individuals; \n Effectiveness measures the extent to which a programme has been successful in achieving its key objectives. The measurement of effectiveness can be quite specific (e.g., the success of a DDR programme in demobilizing and reintegrating the majority of ex\u00ad combatants) or can be defined in broad or strategic terms (e.g., the extent to which a DDR programme has lowered political tensions, reduced levels of insecurity or improved the well\u00adbeing of host communities); \n Efficiency refers to how well a given DDR programme and strategy transformed inputs into results and outputs. This is a different way of focusing on the impact of a pro\u00ad gramme, because it places more emphasis on how economically resources were used to achieve specific outcomes. In certain cases, a DDR programme might have been successful in demobilizing and reintegrating a significant number of ex\u00adcombatants, and improving the welfare of host communities, but used up a disproportionately large share of resources that could have been better used to assist other groups that were not covered by the programme. In such a case, a lack of programme efficiency limited the potential scope of its impact.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66331,7 +66331,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1190, - "Paragraph": "Given the broad scope of DDR programmes, and the differences in strategies, objectives and context, it is difficult to identify specific or generic (i.e., general) results or indicators for evaluating DDR programmes. A more meaningful approach is to identify the various types of impacts or issues to be analysed, and to construct composite (i.e., a group of) indi\u00ad cators as part of an overall methodological approach to evaluating the programme. The following factors usually form the basis from which an evaluation\u2019s focus is defined: \\n Relevance describes the extent to which the objectives of a programme or project remain valid and pertinent (relevant) as originally planned, or as modified owing to changing circumstances within the immediate context and external environment of that pro\u00ad gramme or project. Relevance can also include the suitability of a particular strategy or approach for dealing with a specific problem or issue. A DDR\u00adspecific evaluation could focus on the relevance of cantonment\u00adbased demobilization strategies, for instance, in comparison with other approaches (e.g., decentralized registration of combatants) that perhaps could have more effectively achieved the same objectives; \\n Sustainability involves the success of a strategy in continuing to achieve its initial objec\u00ad tives even after the end of a programme, i.e., whether it has a long\u00adlasting effect. In a DDR programme, this is most important in determining the long\u00adterm viability and effectiveness of reintegration assistance and the extent to which it ensures that ex\u00ad combatants remain in civilian life and do not return to military or violence\u00adbased livelihoods. Indicators in such a methodology include the viability of alternative eco\u00ad nomic livelihoods, behavioural change among ex\u00adcombatants, and so forth; \\n Impact includes the immediate and long\u00adterm consequences of an intervention on the place in which it is implemented, and on the lives of those who are assisted or who benefit from the programme. Evaluating the impact of DDR includes focusing on the immediate social and economic effects of the return of ex\u00adcombatants and their inte\u00ad gration into social and economic life, and the attitudes of communities and the specific direct or indirect effects of these on the lives of individuals; \\n Effectiveness measures the extent to which a programme has been successful in achieving its key objectives. The measurement of effectiveness can be quite specific (e.g., the success of a DDR programme in demobilizing and reintegrating the majority of ex\u00ad combatants) or can be defined in broad or strategic terms (e.g., the extent to which a DDR programme has lowered political tensions, reduced levels of insecurity or improved the well\u00adbeing of host communities); \\n Efficiency refers to how well a given DDR programme and strategy transformed inputs into results and outputs. This is a different way of focusing on the impact of a pro\u00ad gramme, because it places more emphasis on how economically resources were used to achieve specific outcomes. In certain cases, a DDR programme might have been successful in demobilizing and reintegrating a significant number of ex\u00adcombatants, and improving the welfare of host communities, but used up a disproportionately large share of resources that could have been better used to assist other groups that were not covered by the programme. In such a case, a lack of programme efficiency limited the potential scope of its impact.", + "Paragraph": "Given the broad scope of DDR programmes, and the differences in strategies, objectives and context, it is difficult to identify specific or generic (i.e., general) results or indicators for evaluating DDR programmes. A more meaningful approach is to identify the various types of impacts or issues to be analysed, and to construct composite (i.e., a group of) indi\u00ad cators as part of an overall methodological approach to evaluating the programme. The following factors usually form the basis from which an evaluation\u2019s focus is defined: \n Relevance describes the extent to which the objectives of a programme or project remain valid and pertinent (relevant) as originally planned, or as modified owing to changing circumstances within the immediate context and external environment of that pro\u00ad gramme or project. Relevance can also include the suitability of a particular strategy or approach for dealing with a specific problem or issue. A DDR\u00adspecific evaluation could focus on the relevance of cantonment\u00adbased demobilization strategies, for instance, in comparison with other approaches (e.g., decentralized registration of combatants) that perhaps could have more effectively achieved the same objectives; \n Sustainability involves the success of a strategy in continuing to achieve its initial objec\u00ad tives even after the end of a programme, i.e., whether it has a long\u00adlasting effect. In a DDR programme, this is most important in determining the long\u00adterm viability and effectiveness of reintegration assistance and the extent to which it ensures that ex\u00ad combatants remain in civilian life and do not return to military or violence\u00adbased livelihoods. Indicators in such a methodology include the viability of alternative eco\u00ad nomic livelihoods, behavioural change among ex\u00adcombatants, and so forth; \n Impact includes the immediate and long\u00adterm consequences of an intervention on the place in which it is implemented, and on the lives of those who are assisted or who benefit from the programme. Evaluating the impact of DDR includes focusing on the immediate social and economic effects of the return of ex\u00adcombatants and their inte\u00ad gration into social and economic life, and the attitudes of communities and the specific direct or indirect effects of these on the lives of individuals; \n Effectiveness measures the extent to which a programme has been successful in achieving its key objectives. The measurement of effectiveness can be quite specific (e.g., the success of a DDR programme in demobilizing and reintegrating the majority of ex\u00ad combatants) or can be defined in broad or strategic terms (e.g., the extent to which a DDR programme has lowered political tensions, reduced levels of insecurity or improved the well\u00adbeing of host communities); \n Efficiency refers to how well a given DDR programme and strategy transformed inputs into results and outputs. This is a different way of focusing on the impact of a pro\u00ad gramme, because it places more emphasis on how economically resources were used to achieve specific outcomes. In certain cases, a DDR programme might have been successful in demobilizing and reintegrating a significant number of ex\u00adcombatants, and improving the welfare of host communities, but used up a disproportionately large share of resources that could have been better used to assist other groups that were not covered by the programme. In such a case, a lack of programme efficiency limited the potential scope of its impact.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66342,14 +66342,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Selection of results and indicators for evaluation", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The following factors usually form the basis from which an evaluation\u2019s focus is defined: \\n Relevance describes the extent to which the objectives of a programme or project remain valid and pertinent (relevant) as originally planned, or as modified owing to changing circumstances within the immediate context and external environment of that pro\u00ad gramme or project.", + "Sentence": "The following factors usually form the basis from which an evaluation\u2019s focus is defined: \n Relevance describes the extent to which the objectives of a programme or project remain valid and pertinent (relevant) as originally planned, or as modified owing to changing circumstances within the immediate context and external environment of that pro\u00ad gramme or project.", "newParagraph": "given broad scope ddr programme difference strategy objective context difficult identify specific generic ie general result indicator evaluating ddr programme meaningful approach identify various type impact issue analysed construct composite ie group indi cators part overall methodological approach evaluating programme following factor usually form basis evaluation focus defined n relevance describes extent objective programme project remain valid pertinent relevant originally planned modified owing changing circumstance within immediate context external environment pro gramme project relevance also include suitability particular strategy approach dealing specific problem issue ddr specific evaluation could focus relevance cantonment based demobilization strategy instance comparison approach eg decentralized registration combatant perhaps could effectively achieved objective n sustainability involves success strategy continuing achieve initial objec tives even end programme ie whether long lasting effect ddr programme important determining long term viability effectiveness reintegration assistance extent ensures ex combatant remain civilian life return military violence based livelihood indicator methodology include viability alternative eco nomic livelihood behavioural change among ex combatant forth n impact includes immediate long term consequence intervention place implemented life assisted benefit programme evaluating impact ddr includes focusing immediate social economic effect return ex combatant inte gration social economic life attitude community specific direct indirect effect life individual n effectiveness measure extent programme successful achieving key objective measurement effectiveness quite specific eg success ddr programme demobilizing reintegrating majority ex combatant defined broad strategic term eg extent ddr programme lowered political tension reduced level insecurity improved well host community n efficiency refers well given ddr programme strategy transformed input result output different way focusing impact pro gramme place emphasis economically resource used achieve specific outcome certain case ddr programme might successful demobilizing reintegrating significant number ex combatant improving welfare host community used disproportionately large share resource could better used assist group covered programme case lack programme efficiency limited potential scope impact", "ProcessedSent": "following factor usually form basis evaluation focus defined n relevance describes extent objective programme project remain valid pertinent relevant originally planned modified owing changing circumstance within immediate context external environment pro gramme project", "SentID": 3685 }, { "ParagraphID": 1190, - "Paragraph": "Given the broad scope of DDR programmes, and the differences in strategies, objectives and context, it is difficult to identify specific or generic (i.e., general) results or indicators for evaluating DDR programmes. A more meaningful approach is to identify the various types of impacts or issues to be analysed, and to construct composite (i.e., a group of) indi\u00ad cators as part of an overall methodological approach to evaluating the programme. The following factors usually form the basis from which an evaluation\u2019s focus is defined: \\n Relevance describes the extent to which the objectives of a programme or project remain valid and pertinent (relevant) as originally planned, or as modified owing to changing circumstances within the immediate context and external environment of that pro\u00ad gramme or project. Relevance can also include the suitability of a particular strategy or approach for dealing with a specific problem or issue. A DDR\u00adspecific evaluation could focus on the relevance of cantonment\u00adbased demobilization strategies, for instance, in comparison with other approaches (e.g., decentralized registration of combatants) that perhaps could have more effectively achieved the same objectives; \\n Sustainability involves the success of a strategy in continuing to achieve its initial objec\u00ad tives even after the end of a programme, i.e., whether it has a long\u00adlasting effect. In a DDR programme, this is most important in determining the long\u00adterm viability and effectiveness of reintegration assistance and the extent to which it ensures that ex\u00ad combatants remain in civilian life and do not return to military or violence\u00adbased livelihoods. Indicators in such a methodology include the viability of alternative eco\u00ad nomic livelihoods, behavioural change among ex\u00adcombatants, and so forth; \\n Impact includes the immediate and long\u00adterm consequences of an intervention on the place in which it is implemented, and on the lives of those who are assisted or who benefit from the programme. Evaluating the impact of DDR includes focusing on the immediate social and economic effects of the return of ex\u00adcombatants and their inte\u00ad gration into social and economic life, and the attitudes of communities and the specific direct or indirect effects of these on the lives of individuals; \\n Effectiveness measures the extent to which a programme has been successful in achieving its key objectives. The measurement of effectiveness can be quite specific (e.g., the success of a DDR programme in demobilizing and reintegrating the majority of ex\u00ad combatants) or can be defined in broad or strategic terms (e.g., the extent to which a DDR programme has lowered political tensions, reduced levels of insecurity or improved the well\u00adbeing of host communities); \\n Efficiency refers to how well a given DDR programme and strategy transformed inputs into results and outputs. This is a different way of focusing on the impact of a pro\u00ad gramme, because it places more emphasis on how economically resources were used to achieve specific outcomes. In certain cases, a DDR programme might have been successful in demobilizing and reintegrating a significant number of ex\u00adcombatants, and improving the welfare of host communities, but used up a disproportionately large share of resources that could have been better used to assist other groups that were not covered by the programme. In such a case, a lack of programme efficiency limited the potential scope of its impact.", + "Paragraph": "Given the broad scope of DDR programmes, and the differences in strategies, objectives and context, it is difficult to identify specific or generic (i.e., general) results or indicators for evaluating DDR programmes. A more meaningful approach is to identify the various types of impacts or issues to be analysed, and to construct composite (i.e., a group of) indi\u00ad cators as part of an overall methodological approach to evaluating the programme. The following factors usually form the basis from which an evaluation\u2019s focus is defined: \n Relevance describes the extent to which the objectives of a programme or project remain valid and pertinent (relevant) as originally planned, or as modified owing to changing circumstances within the immediate context and external environment of that pro\u00ad gramme or project. Relevance can also include the suitability of a particular strategy or approach for dealing with a specific problem or issue. A DDR\u00adspecific evaluation could focus on the relevance of cantonment\u00adbased demobilization strategies, for instance, in comparison with other approaches (e.g., decentralized registration of combatants) that perhaps could have more effectively achieved the same objectives; \n Sustainability involves the success of a strategy in continuing to achieve its initial objec\u00ad tives even after the end of a programme, i.e., whether it has a long\u00adlasting effect. In a DDR programme, this is most important in determining the long\u00adterm viability and effectiveness of reintegration assistance and the extent to which it ensures that ex\u00ad combatants remain in civilian life and do not return to military or violence\u00adbased livelihoods. Indicators in such a methodology include the viability of alternative eco\u00ad nomic livelihoods, behavioural change among ex\u00adcombatants, and so forth; \n Impact includes the immediate and long\u00adterm consequences of an intervention on the place in which it is implemented, and on the lives of those who are assisted or who benefit from the programme. Evaluating the impact of DDR includes focusing on the immediate social and economic effects of the return of ex\u00adcombatants and their inte\u00ad gration into social and economic life, and the attitudes of communities and the specific direct or indirect effects of these on the lives of individuals; \n Effectiveness measures the extent to which a programme has been successful in achieving its key objectives. The measurement of effectiveness can be quite specific (e.g., the success of a DDR programme in demobilizing and reintegrating the majority of ex\u00ad combatants) or can be defined in broad or strategic terms (e.g., the extent to which a DDR programme has lowered political tensions, reduced levels of insecurity or improved the well\u00adbeing of host communities); \n Efficiency refers to how well a given DDR programme and strategy transformed inputs into results and outputs. This is a different way of focusing on the impact of a pro\u00ad gramme, because it places more emphasis on how economically resources were used to achieve specific outcomes. In certain cases, a DDR programme might have been successful in demobilizing and reintegrating a significant number of ex\u00adcombatants, and improving the welfare of host communities, but used up a disproportionately large share of resources that could have been better used to assist other groups that were not covered by the programme. In such a case, a lack of programme efficiency limited the potential scope of its impact.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66367,7 +66367,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1190, - "Paragraph": "Given the broad scope of DDR programmes, and the differences in strategies, objectives and context, it is difficult to identify specific or generic (i.e., general) results or indicators for evaluating DDR programmes. A more meaningful approach is to identify the various types of impacts or issues to be analysed, and to construct composite (i.e., a group of) indi\u00ad cators as part of an overall methodological approach to evaluating the programme. The following factors usually form the basis from which an evaluation\u2019s focus is defined: \\n Relevance describes the extent to which the objectives of a programme or project remain valid and pertinent (relevant) as originally planned, or as modified owing to changing circumstances within the immediate context and external environment of that pro\u00ad gramme or project. Relevance can also include the suitability of a particular strategy or approach for dealing with a specific problem or issue. A DDR\u00adspecific evaluation could focus on the relevance of cantonment\u00adbased demobilization strategies, for instance, in comparison with other approaches (e.g., decentralized registration of combatants) that perhaps could have more effectively achieved the same objectives; \\n Sustainability involves the success of a strategy in continuing to achieve its initial objec\u00ad tives even after the end of a programme, i.e., whether it has a long\u00adlasting effect. In a DDR programme, this is most important in determining the long\u00adterm viability and effectiveness of reintegration assistance and the extent to which it ensures that ex\u00ad combatants remain in civilian life and do not return to military or violence\u00adbased livelihoods. Indicators in such a methodology include the viability of alternative eco\u00ad nomic livelihoods, behavioural change among ex\u00adcombatants, and so forth; \\n Impact includes the immediate and long\u00adterm consequences of an intervention on the place in which it is implemented, and on the lives of those who are assisted or who benefit from the programme. Evaluating the impact of DDR includes focusing on the immediate social and economic effects of the return of ex\u00adcombatants and their inte\u00ad gration into social and economic life, and the attitudes of communities and the specific direct or indirect effects of these on the lives of individuals; \\n Effectiveness measures the extent to which a programme has been successful in achieving its key objectives. The measurement of effectiveness can be quite specific (e.g., the success of a DDR programme in demobilizing and reintegrating the majority of ex\u00ad combatants) or can be defined in broad or strategic terms (e.g., the extent to which a DDR programme has lowered political tensions, reduced levels of insecurity or improved the well\u00adbeing of host communities); \\n Efficiency refers to how well a given DDR programme and strategy transformed inputs into results and outputs. This is a different way of focusing on the impact of a pro\u00ad gramme, because it places more emphasis on how economically resources were used to achieve specific outcomes. In certain cases, a DDR programme might have been successful in demobilizing and reintegrating a significant number of ex\u00adcombatants, and improving the welfare of host communities, but used up a disproportionately large share of resources that could have been better used to assist other groups that were not covered by the programme. In such a case, a lack of programme efficiency limited the potential scope of its impact.", + "Paragraph": "Given the broad scope of DDR programmes, and the differences in strategies, objectives and context, it is difficult to identify specific or generic (i.e., general) results or indicators for evaluating DDR programmes. A more meaningful approach is to identify the various types of impacts or issues to be analysed, and to construct composite (i.e., a group of) indi\u00ad cators as part of an overall methodological approach to evaluating the programme. The following factors usually form the basis from which an evaluation\u2019s focus is defined: \n Relevance describes the extent to which the objectives of a programme or project remain valid and pertinent (relevant) as originally planned, or as modified owing to changing circumstances within the immediate context and external environment of that pro\u00ad gramme or project. Relevance can also include the suitability of a particular strategy or approach for dealing with a specific problem or issue. A DDR\u00adspecific evaluation could focus on the relevance of cantonment\u00adbased demobilization strategies, for instance, in comparison with other approaches (e.g., decentralized registration of combatants) that perhaps could have more effectively achieved the same objectives; \n Sustainability involves the success of a strategy in continuing to achieve its initial objec\u00ad tives even after the end of a programme, i.e., whether it has a long\u00adlasting effect. In a DDR programme, this is most important in determining the long\u00adterm viability and effectiveness of reintegration assistance and the extent to which it ensures that ex\u00ad combatants remain in civilian life and do not return to military or violence\u00adbased livelihoods. Indicators in such a methodology include the viability of alternative eco\u00ad nomic livelihoods, behavioural change among ex\u00adcombatants, and so forth; \n Impact includes the immediate and long\u00adterm consequences of an intervention on the place in which it is implemented, and on the lives of those who are assisted or who benefit from the programme. Evaluating the impact of DDR includes focusing on the immediate social and economic effects of the return of ex\u00adcombatants and their inte\u00ad gration into social and economic life, and the attitudes of communities and the specific direct or indirect effects of these on the lives of individuals; \n Effectiveness measures the extent to which a programme has been successful in achieving its key objectives. The measurement of effectiveness can be quite specific (e.g., the success of a DDR programme in demobilizing and reintegrating the majority of ex\u00ad combatants) or can be defined in broad or strategic terms (e.g., the extent to which a DDR programme has lowered political tensions, reduced levels of insecurity or improved the well\u00adbeing of host communities); \n Efficiency refers to how well a given DDR programme and strategy transformed inputs into results and outputs. This is a different way of focusing on the impact of a pro\u00ad gramme, because it places more emphasis on how economically resources were used to achieve specific outcomes. In certain cases, a DDR programme might have been successful in demobilizing and reintegrating a significant number of ex\u00adcombatants, and improving the welfare of host communities, but used up a disproportionately large share of resources that could have been better used to assist other groups that were not covered by the programme. In such a case, a lack of programme efficiency limited the potential scope of its impact.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66378,14 +66378,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Selection of results and indicators for evaluation", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "A DDR\u00adspecific evaluation could focus on the relevance of cantonment\u00adbased demobilization strategies, for instance, in comparison with other approaches (e.g., decentralized registration of combatants) that perhaps could have more effectively achieved the same objectives; \\n Sustainability involves the success of a strategy in continuing to achieve its initial objec\u00ad tives even after the end of a programme, i.e., whether it has a long\u00adlasting effect.", + "Sentence": "A DDR\u00adspecific evaluation could focus on the relevance of cantonment\u00adbased demobilization strategies, for instance, in comparison with other approaches (e.g., decentralized registration of combatants) that perhaps could have more effectively achieved the same objectives; \n Sustainability involves the success of a strategy in continuing to achieve its initial objec\u00ad tives even after the end of a programme, i.e., whether it has a long\u00adlasting effect.", "newParagraph": "given broad scope ddr programme difference strategy objective context difficult identify specific generic ie general result indicator evaluating ddr programme meaningful approach identify various type impact issue analysed construct composite ie group indi cators part overall methodological approach evaluating programme following factor usually form basis evaluation focus defined n relevance describes extent objective programme project remain valid pertinent relevant originally planned modified owing changing circumstance within immediate context external environment pro gramme project relevance also include suitability particular strategy approach dealing specific problem issue ddr specific evaluation could focus relevance cantonment based demobilization strategy instance comparison approach eg decentralized registration combatant perhaps could effectively achieved objective n sustainability involves success strategy continuing achieve initial objec tives even end programme ie whether long lasting effect ddr programme important determining long term viability effectiveness reintegration assistance extent ensures ex combatant remain civilian life return military violence based livelihood indicator methodology include viability alternative eco nomic livelihood behavioural change among ex combatant forth n impact includes immediate long term consequence intervention place implemented life assisted benefit programme evaluating impact ddr includes focusing immediate social economic effect return ex combatant inte gration social economic life attitude community specific direct indirect effect life individual n effectiveness measure extent programme successful achieving key objective measurement effectiveness quite specific eg success ddr programme demobilizing reintegrating majority ex combatant defined broad strategic term eg extent ddr programme lowered political tension reduced level insecurity improved well host community n efficiency refers well given ddr programme strategy transformed input result output different way focusing impact pro gramme place emphasis economically resource used achieve specific outcome certain case ddr programme might successful demobilizing reintegrating significant number ex combatant improving welfare host community used disproportionately large share resource could better used assist group covered programme case lack programme efficiency limited potential scope impact", "ProcessedSent": "ddr specific evaluation could focus relevance cantonment based demobilization strategy instance comparison approach eg decentralized registration combatant perhaps could effectively achieved objective n sustainability involves success strategy continuing achieve initial objec tives even end programme ie whether long lasting effect", "SentID": 3687 }, { "ParagraphID": 1190, - "Paragraph": "Given the broad scope of DDR programmes, and the differences in strategies, objectives and context, it is difficult to identify specific or generic (i.e., general) results or indicators for evaluating DDR programmes. A more meaningful approach is to identify the various types of impacts or issues to be analysed, and to construct composite (i.e., a group of) indi\u00ad cators as part of an overall methodological approach to evaluating the programme. The following factors usually form the basis from which an evaluation\u2019s focus is defined: \\n Relevance describes the extent to which the objectives of a programme or project remain valid and pertinent (relevant) as originally planned, or as modified owing to changing circumstances within the immediate context and external environment of that pro\u00ad gramme or project. Relevance can also include the suitability of a particular strategy or approach for dealing with a specific problem or issue. A DDR\u00adspecific evaluation could focus on the relevance of cantonment\u00adbased demobilization strategies, for instance, in comparison with other approaches (e.g., decentralized registration of combatants) that perhaps could have more effectively achieved the same objectives; \\n Sustainability involves the success of a strategy in continuing to achieve its initial objec\u00ad tives even after the end of a programme, i.e., whether it has a long\u00adlasting effect. In a DDR programme, this is most important in determining the long\u00adterm viability and effectiveness of reintegration assistance and the extent to which it ensures that ex\u00ad combatants remain in civilian life and do not return to military or violence\u00adbased livelihoods. Indicators in such a methodology include the viability of alternative eco\u00ad nomic livelihoods, behavioural change among ex\u00adcombatants, and so forth; \\n Impact includes the immediate and long\u00adterm consequences of an intervention on the place in which it is implemented, and on the lives of those who are assisted or who benefit from the programme. Evaluating the impact of DDR includes focusing on the immediate social and economic effects of the return of ex\u00adcombatants and their inte\u00ad gration into social and economic life, and the attitudes of communities and the specific direct or indirect effects of these on the lives of individuals; \\n Effectiveness measures the extent to which a programme has been successful in achieving its key objectives. The measurement of effectiveness can be quite specific (e.g., the success of a DDR programme in demobilizing and reintegrating the majority of ex\u00ad combatants) or can be defined in broad or strategic terms (e.g., the extent to which a DDR programme has lowered political tensions, reduced levels of insecurity or improved the well\u00adbeing of host communities); \\n Efficiency refers to how well a given DDR programme and strategy transformed inputs into results and outputs. This is a different way of focusing on the impact of a pro\u00ad gramme, because it places more emphasis on how economically resources were used to achieve specific outcomes. In certain cases, a DDR programme might have been successful in demobilizing and reintegrating a significant number of ex\u00adcombatants, and improving the welfare of host communities, but used up a disproportionately large share of resources that could have been better used to assist other groups that were not covered by the programme. In such a case, a lack of programme efficiency limited the potential scope of its impact.", + "Paragraph": "Given the broad scope of DDR programmes, and the differences in strategies, objectives and context, it is difficult to identify specific or generic (i.e., general) results or indicators for evaluating DDR programmes. A more meaningful approach is to identify the various types of impacts or issues to be analysed, and to construct composite (i.e., a group of) indi\u00ad cators as part of an overall methodological approach to evaluating the programme. The following factors usually form the basis from which an evaluation\u2019s focus is defined: \n Relevance describes the extent to which the objectives of a programme or project remain valid and pertinent (relevant) as originally planned, or as modified owing to changing circumstances within the immediate context and external environment of that pro\u00ad gramme or project. Relevance can also include the suitability of a particular strategy or approach for dealing with a specific problem or issue. A DDR\u00adspecific evaluation could focus on the relevance of cantonment\u00adbased demobilization strategies, for instance, in comparison with other approaches (e.g., decentralized registration of combatants) that perhaps could have more effectively achieved the same objectives; \n Sustainability involves the success of a strategy in continuing to achieve its initial objec\u00ad tives even after the end of a programme, i.e., whether it has a long\u00adlasting effect. In a DDR programme, this is most important in determining the long\u00adterm viability and effectiveness of reintegration assistance and the extent to which it ensures that ex\u00ad combatants remain in civilian life and do not return to military or violence\u00adbased livelihoods. Indicators in such a methodology include the viability of alternative eco\u00ad nomic livelihoods, behavioural change among ex\u00adcombatants, and so forth; \n Impact includes the immediate and long\u00adterm consequences of an intervention on the place in which it is implemented, and on the lives of those who are assisted or who benefit from the programme. Evaluating the impact of DDR includes focusing on the immediate social and economic effects of the return of ex\u00adcombatants and their inte\u00ad gration into social and economic life, and the attitudes of communities and the specific direct or indirect effects of these on the lives of individuals; \n Effectiveness measures the extent to which a programme has been successful in achieving its key objectives. The measurement of effectiveness can be quite specific (e.g., the success of a DDR programme in demobilizing and reintegrating the majority of ex\u00ad combatants) or can be defined in broad or strategic terms (e.g., the extent to which a DDR programme has lowered political tensions, reduced levels of insecurity or improved the well\u00adbeing of host communities); \n Efficiency refers to how well a given DDR programme and strategy transformed inputs into results and outputs. This is a different way of focusing on the impact of a pro\u00ad gramme, because it places more emphasis on how economically resources were used to achieve specific outcomes. In certain cases, a DDR programme might have been successful in demobilizing and reintegrating a significant number of ex\u00adcombatants, and improving the welfare of host communities, but used up a disproportionately large share of resources that could have been better used to assist other groups that were not covered by the programme. In such a case, a lack of programme efficiency limited the potential scope of its impact.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66403,7 +66403,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1190, - "Paragraph": "Given the broad scope of DDR programmes, and the differences in strategies, objectives and context, it is difficult to identify specific or generic (i.e., general) results or indicators for evaluating DDR programmes. A more meaningful approach is to identify the various types of impacts or issues to be analysed, and to construct composite (i.e., a group of) indi\u00ad cators as part of an overall methodological approach to evaluating the programme. The following factors usually form the basis from which an evaluation\u2019s focus is defined: \\n Relevance describes the extent to which the objectives of a programme or project remain valid and pertinent (relevant) as originally planned, or as modified owing to changing circumstances within the immediate context and external environment of that pro\u00ad gramme or project. Relevance can also include the suitability of a particular strategy or approach for dealing with a specific problem or issue. A DDR\u00adspecific evaluation could focus on the relevance of cantonment\u00adbased demobilization strategies, for instance, in comparison with other approaches (e.g., decentralized registration of combatants) that perhaps could have more effectively achieved the same objectives; \\n Sustainability involves the success of a strategy in continuing to achieve its initial objec\u00ad tives even after the end of a programme, i.e., whether it has a long\u00adlasting effect. In a DDR programme, this is most important in determining the long\u00adterm viability and effectiveness of reintegration assistance and the extent to which it ensures that ex\u00ad combatants remain in civilian life and do not return to military or violence\u00adbased livelihoods. Indicators in such a methodology include the viability of alternative eco\u00ad nomic livelihoods, behavioural change among ex\u00adcombatants, and so forth; \\n Impact includes the immediate and long\u00adterm consequences of an intervention on the place in which it is implemented, and on the lives of those who are assisted or who benefit from the programme. Evaluating the impact of DDR includes focusing on the immediate social and economic effects of the return of ex\u00adcombatants and their inte\u00ad gration into social and economic life, and the attitudes of communities and the specific direct or indirect effects of these on the lives of individuals; \\n Effectiveness measures the extent to which a programme has been successful in achieving its key objectives. The measurement of effectiveness can be quite specific (e.g., the success of a DDR programme in demobilizing and reintegrating the majority of ex\u00ad combatants) or can be defined in broad or strategic terms (e.g., the extent to which a DDR programme has lowered political tensions, reduced levels of insecurity or improved the well\u00adbeing of host communities); \\n Efficiency refers to how well a given DDR programme and strategy transformed inputs into results and outputs. This is a different way of focusing on the impact of a pro\u00ad gramme, because it places more emphasis on how economically resources were used to achieve specific outcomes. In certain cases, a DDR programme might have been successful in demobilizing and reintegrating a significant number of ex\u00adcombatants, and improving the welfare of host communities, but used up a disproportionately large share of resources that could have been better used to assist other groups that were not covered by the programme. In such a case, a lack of programme efficiency limited the potential scope of its impact.", + "Paragraph": "Given the broad scope of DDR programmes, and the differences in strategies, objectives and context, it is difficult to identify specific or generic (i.e., general) results or indicators for evaluating DDR programmes. A more meaningful approach is to identify the various types of impacts or issues to be analysed, and to construct composite (i.e., a group of) indi\u00ad cators as part of an overall methodological approach to evaluating the programme. The following factors usually form the basis from which an evaluation\u2019s focus is defined: \n Relevance describes the extent to which the objectives of a programme or project remain valid and pertinent (relevant) as originally planned, or as modified owing to changing circumstances within the immediate context and external environment of that pro\u00ad gramme or project. Relevance can also include the suitability of a particular strategy or approach for dealing with a specific problem or issue. A DDR\u00adspecific evaluation could focus on the relevance of cantonment\u00adbased demobilization strategies, for instance, in comparison with other approaches (e.g., decentralized registration of combatants) that perhaps could have more effectively achieved the same objectives; \n Sustainability involves the success of a strategy in continuing to achieve its initial objec\u00ad tives even after the end of a programme, i.e., whether it has a long\u00adlasting effect. In a DDR programme, this is most important in determining the long\u00adterm viability and effectiveness of reintegration assistance and the extent to which it ensures that ex\u00ad combatants remain in civilian life and do not return to military or violence\u00adbased livelihoods. Indicators in such a methodology include the viability of alternative eco\u00ad nomic livelihoods, behavioural change among ex\u00adcombatants, and so forth; \n Impact includes the immediate and long\u00adterm consequences of an intervention on the place in which it is implemented, and on the lives of those who are assisted or who benefit from the programme. Evaluating the impact of DDR includes focusing on the immediate social and economic effects of the return of ex\u00adcombatants and their inte\u00ad gration into social and economic life, and the attitudes of communities and the specific direct or indirect effects of these on the lives of individuals; \n Effectiveness measures the extent to which a programme has been successful in achieving its key objectives. The measurement of effectiveness can be quite specific (e.g., the success of a DDR programme in demobilizing and reintegrating the majority of ex\u00ad combatants) or can be defined in broad or strategic terms (e.g., the extent to which a DDR programme has lowered political tensions, reduced levels of insecurity or improved the well\u00adbeing of host communities); \n Efficiency refers to how well a given DDR programme and strategy transformed inputs into results and outputs. This is a different way of focusing on the impact of a pro\u00ad gramme, because it places more emphasis on how economically resources were used to achieve specific outcomes. In certain cases, a DDR programme might have been successful in demobilizing and reintegrating a significant number of ex\u00adcombatants, and improving the welfare of host communities, but used up a disproportionately large share of resources that could have been better used to assist other groups that were not covered by the programme. In such a case, a lack of programme efficiency limited the potential scope of its impact.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66414,14 +66414,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Selection of results and indicators for evaluation", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Indicators in such a methodology include the viability of alternative eco\u00ad nomic livelihoods, behavioural change among ex\u00adcombatants, and so forth; \\n Impact includes the immediate and long\u00adterm consequences of an intervention on the place in which it is implemented, and on the lives of those who are assisted or who benefit from the programme.", + "Sentence": "Indicators in such a methodology include the viability of alternative eco\u00ad nomic livelihoods, behavioural change among ex\u00adcombatants, and so forth; \n Impact includes the immediate and long\u00adterm consequences of an intervention on the place in which it is implemented, and on the lives of those who are assisted or who benefit from the programme.", "newParagraph": "given broad scope ddr programme difference strategy objective context difficult identify specific generic ie general result indicator evaluating ddr programme meaningful approach identify various type impact issue analysed construct composite ie group indi cators part overall methodological approach evaluating programme following factor usually form basis evaluation focus defined n relevance describes extent objective programme project remain valid pertinent relevant originally planned modified owing changing circumstance within immediate context external environment pro gramme project relevance also include suitability particular strategy approach dealing specific problem issue ddr specific evaluation could focus relevance cantonment based demobilization strategy instance comparison approach eg decentralized registration combatant perhaps could effectively achieved objective n sustainability involves success strategy continuing achieve initial objec tives even end programme ie whether long lasting effect ddr programme important determining long term viability effectiveness reintegration assistance extent ensures ex combatant remain civilian life return military violence based livelihood indicator methodology include viability alternative eco nomic livelihood behavioural change among ex combatant forth n impact includes immediate long term consequence intervention place implemented life assisted benefit programme evaluating impact ddr includes focusing immediate social economic effect return ex combatant inte gration social economic life attitude community specific direct indirect effect life individual n effectiveness measure extent programme successful achieving key objective measurement effectiveness quite specific eg success ddr programme demobilizing reintegrating majority ex combatant defined broad strategic term eg extent ddr programme lowered political tension reduced level insecurity improved well host community n efficiency refers well given ddr programme strategy transformed input result output different way focusing impact pro gramme place emphasis economically resource used achieve specific outcome certain case ddr programme might successful demobilizing reintegrating significant number ex combatant improving welfare host community used disproportionately large share resource could better used assist group covered programme case lack programme efficiency limited potential scope impact", "ProcessedSent": "indicator methodology include viability alternative eco nomic livelihood behavioural change among ex combatant forth n impact includes immediate long term consequence intervention place implemented life assisted benefit programme", "SentID": 3689 }, { "ParagraphID": 1190, - "Paragraph": "Given the broad scope of DDR programmes, and the differences in strategies, objectives and context, it is difficult to identify specific or generic (i.e., general) results or indicators for evaluating DDR programmes. A more meaningful approach is to identify the various types of impacts or issues to be analysed, and to construct composite (i.e., a group of) indi\u00ad cators as part of an overall methodological approach to evaluating the programme. The following factors usually form the basis from which an evaluation\u2019s focus is defined: \\n Relevance describes the extent to which the objectives of a programme or project remain valid and pertinent (relevant) as originally planned, or as modified owing to changing circumstances within the immediate context and external environment of that pro\u00ad gramme or project. Relevance can also include the suitability of a particular strategy or approach for dealing with a specific problem or issue. A DDR\u00adspecific evaluation could focus on the relevance of cantonment\u00adbased demobilization strategies, for instance, in comparison with other approaches (e.g., decentralized registration of combatants) that perhaps could have more effectively achieved the same objectives; \\n Sustainability involves the success of a strategy in continuing to achieve its initial objec\u00ad tives even after the end of a programme, i.e., whether it has a long\u00adlasting effect. In a DDR programme, this is most important in determining the long\u00adterm viability and effectiveness of reintegration assistance and the extent to which it ensures that ex\u00ad combatants remain in civilian life and do not return to military or violence\u00adbased livelihoods. Indicators in such a methodology include the viability of alternative eco\u00ad nomic livelihoods, behavioural change among ex\u00adcombatants, and so forth; \\n Impact includes the immediate and long\u00adterm consequences of an intervention on the place in which it is implemented, and on the lives of those who are assisted or who benefit from the programme. Evaluating the impact of DDR includes focusing on the immediate social and economic effects of the return of ex\u00adcombatants and their inte\u00ad gration into social and economic life, and the attitudes of communities and the specific direct or indirect effects of these on the lives of individuals; \\n Effectiveness measures the extent to which a programme has been successful in achieving its key objectives. The measurement of effectiveness can be quite specific (e.g., the success of a DDR programme in demobilizing and reintegrating the majority of ex\u00ad combatants) or can be defined in broad or strategic terms (e.g., the extent to which a DDR programme has lowered political tensions, reduced levels of insecurity or improved the well\u00adbeing of host communities); \\n Efficiency refers to how well a given DDR programme and strategy transformed inputs into results and outputs. This is a different way of focusing on the impact of a pro\u00ad gramme, because it places more emphasis on how economically resources were used to achieve specific outcomes. In certain cases, a DDR programme might have been successful in demobilizing and reintegrating a significant number of ex\u00adcombatants, and improving the welfare of host communities, but used up a disproportionately large share of resources that could have been better used to assist other groups that were not covered by the programme. In such a case, a lack of programme efficiency limited the potential scope of its impact.", + "Paragraph": "Given the broad scope of DDR programmes, and the differences in strategies, objectives and context, it is difficult to identify specific or generic (i.e., general) results or indicators for evaluating DDR programmes. A more meaningful approach is to identify the various types of impacts or issues to be analysed, and to construct composite (i.e., a group of) indi\u00ad cators as part of an overall methodological approach to evaluating the programme. The following factors usually form the basis from which an evaluation\u2019s focus is defined: \n Relevance describes the extent to which the objectives of a programme or project remain valid and pertinent (relevant) as originally planned, or as modified owing to changing circumstances within the immediate context and external environment of that pro\u00ad gramme or project. Relevance can also include the suitability of a particular strategy or approach for dealing with a specific problem or issue. A DDR\u00adspecific evaluation could focus on the relevance of cantonment\u00adbased demobilization strategies, for instance, in comparison with other approaches (e.g., decentralized registration of combatants) that perhaps could have more effectively achieved the same objectives; \n Sustainability involves the success of a strategy in continuing to achieve its initial objec\u00ad tives even after the end of a programme, i.e., whether it has a long\u00adlasting effect. In a DDR programme, this is most important in determining the long\u00adterm viability and effectiveness of reintegration assistance and the extent to which it ensures that ex\u00ad combatants remain in civilian life and do not return to military or violence\u00adbased livelihoods. Indicators in such a methodology include the viability of alternative eco\u00ad nomic livelihoods, behavioural change among ex\u00adcombatants, and so forth; \n Impact includes the immediate and long\u00adterm consequences of an intervention on the place in which it is implemented, and on the lives of those who are assisted or who benefit from the programme. Evaluating the impact of DDR includes focusing on the immediate social and economic effects of the return of ex\u00adcombatants and their inte\u00ad gration into social and economic life, and the attitudes of communities and the specific direct or indirect effects of these on the lives of individuals; \n Effectiveness measures the extent to which a programme has been successful in achieving its key objectives. The measurement of effectiveness can be quite specific (e.g., the success of a DDR programme in demobilizing and reintegrating the majority of ex\u00ad combatants) or can be defined in broad or strategic terms (e.g., the extent to which a DDR programme has lowered political tensions, reduced levels of insecurity or improved the well\u00adbeing of host communities); \n Efficiency refers to how well a given DDR programme and strategy transformed inputs into results and outputs. This is a different way of focusing on the impact of a pro\u00ad gramme, because it places more emphasis on how economically resources were used to achieve specific outcomes. In certain cases, a DDR programme might have been successful in demobilizing and reintegrating a significant number of ex\u00adcombatants, and improving the welfare of host communities, but used up a disproportionately large share of resources that could have been better used to assist other groups that were not covered by the programme. In such a case, a lack of programme efficiency limited the potential scope of its impact.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66432,14 +66432,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Selection of results and indicators for evaluation", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Evaluating the impact of DDR includes focusing on the immediate social and economic effects of the return of ex\u00adcombatants and their inte\u00ad gration into social and economic life, and the attitudes of communities and the specific direct or indirect effects of these on the lives of individuals; \\n Effectiveness measures the extent to which a programme has been successful in achieving its key objectives.", + "Sentence": "Evaluating the impact of DDR includes focusing on the immediate social and economic effects of the return of ex\u00adcombatants and their inte\u00ad gration into social and economic life, and the attitudes of communities and the specific direct or indirect effects of these on the lives of individuals; \n Effectiveness measures the extent to which a programme has been successful in achieving its key objectives.", "newParagraph": "given broad scope ddr programme difference strategy objective context difficult identify specific generic ie general result indicator evaluating ddr programme meaningful approach identify various type impact issue analysed construct composite ie group indi cators part overall methodological approach evaluating programme following factor usually form basis evaluation focus defined n relevance describes extent objective programme project remain valid pertinent relevant originally planned modified owing changing circumstance within immediate context external environment pro gramme project relevance also include suitability particular strategy approach dealing specific problem issue ddr specific evaluation could focus relevance cantonment based demobilization strategy instance comparison approach eg decentralized registration combatant perhaps could effectively achieved objective n sustainability involves success strategy continuing achieve initial objec tives even end programme ie whether long lasting effect ddr programme important determining long term viability effectiveness reintegration assistance extent ensures ex combatant remain civilian life return military violence based livelihood indicator methodology include viability alternative eco nomic livelihood behavioural change among ex combatant forth n impact includes immediate long term consequence intervention place implemented life assisted benefit programme evaluating impact ddr includes focusing immediate social economic effect return ex combatant inte gration social economic life attitude community specific direct indirect effect life individual n effectiveness measure extent programme successful achieving key objective measurement effectiveness quite specific eg success ddr programme demobilizing reintegrating majority ex combatant defined broad strategic term eg extent ddr programme lowered political tension reduced level insecurity improved well host community n efficiency refers well given ddr programme strategy transformed input result output different way focusing impact pro gramme place emphasis economically resource used achieve specific outcome certain case ddr programme might successful demobilizing reintegrating significant number ex combatant improving welfare host community used disproportionately large share resource could better used assist group covered programme case lack programme efficiency limited potential scope impact", "ProcessedSent": "evaluating impact ddr includes focusing immediate social economic effect return ex combatant inte gration social economic life attitude community specific direct indirect effect life individual n effectiveness measure extent programme successful achieving key objective", "SentID": 3690 }, { "ParagraphID": 1190, - "Paragraph": "Given the broad scope of DDR programmes, and the differences in strategies, objectives and context, it is difficult to identify specific or generic (i.e., general) results or indicators for evaluating DDR programmes. A more meaningful approach is to identify the various types of impacts or issues to be analysed, and to construct composite (i.e., a group of) indi\u00ad cators as part of an overall methodological approach to evaluating the programme. The following factors usually form the basis from which an evaluation\u2019s focus is defined: \\n Relevance describes the extent to which the objectives of a programme or project remain valid and pertinent (relevant) as originally planned, or as modified owing to changing circumstances within the immediate context and external environment of that pro\u00ad gramme or project. Relevance can also include the suitability of a particular strategy or approach for dealing with a specific problem or issue. A DDR\u00adspecific evaluation could focus on the relevance of cantonment\u00adbased demobilization strategies, for instance, in comparison with other approaches (e.g., decentralized registration of combatants) that perhaps could have more effectively achieved the same objectives; \\n Sustainability involves the success of a strategy in continuing to achieve its initial objec\u00ad tives even after the end of a programme, i.e., whether it has a long\u00adlasting effect. In a DDR programme, this is most important in determining the long\u00adterm viability and effectiveness of reintegration assistance and the extent to which it ensures that ex\u00ad combatants remain in civilian life and do not return to military or violence\u00adbased livelihoods. Indicators in such a methodology include the viability of alternative eco\u00ad nomic livelihoods, behavioural change among ex\u00adcombatants, and so forth; \\n Impact includes the immediate and long\u00adterm consequences of an intervention on the place in which it is implemented, and on the lives of those who are assisted or who benefit from the programme. Evaluating the impact of DDR includes focusing on the immediate social and economic effects of the return of ex\u00adcombatants and their inte\u00ad gration into social and economic life, and the attitudes of communities and the specific direct or indirect effects of these on the lives of individuals; \\n Effectiveness measures the extent to which a programme has been successful in achieving its key objectives. The measurement of effectiveness can be quite specific (e.g., the success of a DDR programme in demobilizing and reintegrating the majority of ex\u00ad combatants) or can be defined in broad or strategic terms (e.g., the extent to which a DDR programme has lowered political tensions, reduced levels of insecurity or improved the well\u00adbeing of host communities); \\n Efficiency refers to how well a given DDR programme and strategy transformed inputs into results and outputs. This is a different way of focusing on the impact of a pro\u00ad gramme, because it places more emphasis on how economically resources were used to achieve specific outcomes. In certain cases, a DDR programme might have been successful in demobilizing and reintegrating a significant number of ex\u00adcombatants, and improving the welfare of host communities, but used up a disproportionately large share of resources that could have been better used to assist other groups that were not covered by the programme. In such a case, a lack of programme efficiency limited the potential scope of its impact.", + "Paragraph": "Given the broad scope of DDR programmes, and the differences in strategies, objectives and context, it is difficult to identify specific or generic (i.e., general) results or indicators for evaluating DDR programmes. A more meaningful approach is to identify the various types of impacts or issues to be analysed, and to construct composite (i.e., a group of) indi\u00ad cators as part of an overall methodological approach to evaluating the programme. The following factors usually form the basis from which an evaluation\u2019s focus is defined: \n Relevance describes the extent to which the objectives of a programme or project remain valid and pertinent (relevant) as originally planned, or as modified owing to changing circumstances within the immediate context and external environment of that pro\u00ad gramme or project. Relevance can also include the suitability of a particular strategy or approach for dealing with a specific problem or issue. A DDR\u00adspecific evaluation could focus on the relevance of cantonment\u00adbased demobilization strategies, for instance, in comparison with other approaches (e.g., decentralized registration of combatants) that perhaps could have more effectively achieved the same objectives; \n Sustainability involves the success of a strategy in continuing to achieve its initial objec\u00ad tives even after the end of a programme, i.e., whether it has a long\u00adlasting effect. In a DDR programme, this is most important in determining the long\u00adterm viability and effectiveness of reintegration assistance and the extent to which it ensures that ex\u00ad combatants remain in civilian life and do not return to military or violence\u00adbased livelihoods. Indicators in such a methodology include the viability of alternative eco\u00ad nomic livelihoods, behavioural change among ex\u00adcombatants, and so forth; \n Impact includes the immediate and long\u00adterm consequences of an intervention on the place in which it is implemented, and on the lives of those who are assisted or who benefit from the programme. Evaluating the impact of DDR includes focusing on the immediate social and economic effects of the return of ex\u00adcombatants and their inte\u00ad gration into social and economic life, and the attitudes of communities and the specific direct or indirect effects of these on the lives of individuals; \n Effectiveness measures the extent to which a programme has been successful in achieving its key objectives. The measurement of effectiveness can be quite specific (e.g., the success of a DDR programme in demobilizing and reintegrating the majority of ex\u00ad combatants) or can be defined in broad or strategic terms (e.g., the extent to which a DDR programme has lowered political tensions, reduced levels of insecurity or improved the well\u00adbeing of host communities); \n Efficiency refers to how well a given DDR programme and strategy transformed inputs into results and outputs. This is a different way of focusing on the impact of a pro\u00ad gramme, because it places more emphasis on how economically resources were used to achieve specific outcomes. In certain cases, a DDR programme might have been successful in demobilizing and reintegrating a significant number of ex\u00adcombatants, and improving the welfare of host communities, but used up a disproportionately large share of resources that could have been better used to assist other groups that were not covered by the programme. In such a case, a lack of programme efficiency limited the potential scope of its impact.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66450,14 +66450,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Selection of results and indicators for evaluation", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The measurement of effectiveness can be quite specific (e.g., the success of a DDR programme in demobilizing and reintegrating the majority of ex\u00ad combatants) or can be defined in broad or strategic terms (e.g., the extent to which a DDR programme has lowered political tensions, reduced levels of insecurity or improved the well\u00adbeing of host communities); \\n Efficiency refers to how well a given DDR programme and strategy transformed inputs into results and outputs.", + "Sentence": "The measurement of effectiveness can be quite specific (e.g., the success of a DDR programme in demobilizing and reintegrating the majority of ex\u00ad combatants) or can be defined in broad or strategic terms (e.g., the extent to which a DDR programme has lowered political tensions, reduced levels of insecurity or improved the well\u00adbeing of host communities); \n Efficiency refers to how well a given DDR programme and strategy transformed inputs into results and outputs.", "newParagraph": "given broad scope ddr programme difference strategy objective context difficult identify specific generic ie general result indicator evaluating ddr programme meaningful approach identify various type impact issue analysed construct composite ie group indi cators part overall methodological approach evaluating programme following factor usually form basis evaluation focus defined n relevance describes extent objective programme project remain valid pertinent relevant originally planned modified owing changing circumstance within immediate context external environment pro gramme project relevance also include suitability particular strategy approach dealing specific problem issue ddr specific evaluation could focus relevance cantonment based demobilization strategy instance comparison approach eg decentralized registration combatant perhaps could effectively achieved objective n sustainability involves success strategy continuing achieve initial objec tives even end programme ie whether long lasting effect ddr programme important determining long term viability effectiveness reintegration assistance extent ensures ex combatant remain civilian life return military violence based livelihood indicator methodology include viability alternative eco nomic livelihood behavioural change among ex combatant forth n impact includes immediate long term consequence intervention place implemented life assisted benefit programme evaluating impact ddr includes focusing immediate social economic effect return ex combatant inte gration social economic life attitude community specific direct indirect effect life individual n effectiveness measure extent programme successful achieving key objective measurement effectiveness quite specific eg success ddr programme demobilizing reintegrating majority ex combatant defined broad strategic term eg extent ddr programme lowered political tension reduced level insecurity improved well host community n efficiency refers well given ddr programme strategy transformed input result output different way focusing impact pro gramme place emphasis economically resource used achieve specific outcome certain case ddr programme might successful demobilizing reintegrating significant number ex combatant improving welfare host community used disproportionately large share resource could better used assist group covered programme case lack programme efficiency limited potential scope impact", "ProcessedSent": "measurement effectiveness quite specific eg success ddr programme demobilizing reintegrating majority ex combatant defined broad strategic term eg extent ddr programme lowered political tension reduced level insecurity improved well host community n efficiency refers well given ddr programme strategy transformed input result output", "SentID": 3691 }, { "ParagraphID": 1190, - "Paragraph": "Given the broad scope of DDR programmes, and the differences in strategies, objectives and context, it is difficult to identify specific or generic (i.e., general) results or indicators for evaluating DDR programmes. A more meaningful approach is to identify the various types of impacts or issues to be analysed, and to construct composite (i.e., a group of) indi\u00ad cators as part of an overall methodological approach to evaluating the programme. The following factors usually form the basis from which an evaluation\u2019s focus is defined: \\n Relevance describes the extent to which the objectives of a programme or project remain valid and pertinent (relevant) as originally planned, or as modified owing to changing circumstances within the immediate context and external environment of that pro\u00ad gramme or project. Relevance can also include the suitability of a particular strategy or approach for dealing with a specific problem or issue. A DDR\u00adspecific evaluation could focus on the relevance of cantonment\u00adbased demobilization strategies, for instance, in comparison with other approaches (e.g., decentralized registration of combatants) that perhaps could have more effectively achieved the same objectives; \\n Sustainability involves the success of a strategy in continuing to achieve its initial objec\u00ad tives even after the end of a programme, i.e., whether it has a long\u00adlasting effect. In a DDR programme, this is most important in determining the long\u00adterm viability and effectiveness of reintegration assistance and the extent to which it ensures that ex\u00ad combatants remain in civilian life and do not return to military or violence\u00adbased livelihoods. Indicators in such a methodology include the viability of alternative eco\u00ad nomic livelihoods, behavioural change among ex\u00adcombatants, and so forth; \\n Impact includes the immediate and long\u00adterm consequences of an intervention on the place in which it is implemented, and on the lives of those who are assisted or who benefit from the programme. Evaluating the impact of DDR includes focusing on the immediate social and economic effects of the return of ex\u00adcombatants and their inte\u00ad gration into social and economic life, and the attitudes of communities and the specific direct or indirect effects of these on the lives of individuals; \\n Effectiveness measures the extent to which a programme has been successful in achieving its key objectives. The measurement of effectiveness can be quite specific (e.g., the success of a DDR programme in demobilizing and reintegrating the majority of ex\u00ad combatants) or can be defined in broad or strategic terms (e.g., the extent to which a DDR programme has lowered political tensions, reduced levels of insecurity or improved the well\u00adbeing of host communities); \\n Efficiency refers to how well a given DDR programme and strategy transformed inputs into results and outputs. This is a different way of focusing on the impact of a pro\u00ad gramme, because it places more emphasis on how economically resources were used to achieve specific outcomes. In certain cases, a DDR programme might have been successful in demobilizing and reintegrating a significant number of ex\u00adcombatants, and improving the welfare of host communities, but used up a disproportionately large share of resources that could have been better used to assist other groups that were not covered by the programme. In such a case, a lack of programme efficiency limited the potential scope of its impact.", + "Paragraph": "Given the broad scope of DDR programmes, and the differences in strategies, objectives and context, it is difficult to identify specific or generic (i.e., general) results or indicators for evaluating DDR programmes. A more meaningful approach is to identify the various types of impacts or issues to be analysed, and to construct composite (i.e., a group of) indi\u00ad cators as part of an overall methodological approach to evaluating the programme. The following factors usually form the basis from which an evaluation\u2019s focus is defined: \n Relevance describes the extent to which the objectives of a programme or project remain valid and pertinent (relevant) as originally planned, or as modified owing to changing circumstances within the immediate context and external environment of that pro\u00ad gramme or project. Relevance can also include the suitability of a particular strategy or approach for dealing with a specific problem or issue. A DDR\u00adspecific evaluation could focus on the relevance of cantonment\u00adbased demobilization strategies, for instance, in comparison with other approaches (e.g., decentralized registration of combatants) that perhaps could have more effectively achieved the same objectives; \n Sustainability involves the success of a strategy in continuing to achieve its initial objec\u00ad tives even after the end of a programme, i.e., whether it has a long\u00adlasting effect. In a DDR programme, this is most important in determining the long\u00adterm viability and effectiveness of reintegration assistance and the extent to which it ensures that ex\u00ad combatants remain in civilian life and do not return to military or violence\u00adbased livelihoods. Indicators in such a methodology include the viability of alternative eco\u00ad nomic livelihoods, behavioural change among ex\u00adcombatants, and so forth; \n Impact includes the immediate and long\u00adterm consequences of an intervention on the place in which it is implemented, and on the lives of those who are assisted or who benefit from the programme. Evaluating the impact of DDR includes focusing on the immediate social and economic effects of the return of ex\u00adcombatants and their inte\u00ad gration into social and economic life, and the attitudes of communities and the specific direct or indirect effects of these on the lives of individuals; \n Effectiveness measures the extent to which a programme has been successful in achieving its key objectives. The measurement of effectiveness can be quite specific (e.g., the success of a DDR programme in demobilizing and reintegrating the majority of ex\u00ad combatants) or can be defined in broad or strategic terms (e.g., the extent to which a DDR programme has lowered political tensions, reduced levels of insecurity or improved the well\u00adbeing of host communities); \n Efficiency refers to how well a given DDR programme and strategy transformed inputs into results and outputs. This is a different way of focusing on the impact of a pro\u00ad gramme, because it places more emphasis on how economically resources were used to achieve specific outcomes. In certain cases, a DDR programme might have been successful in demobilizing and reintegrating a significant number of ex\u00adcombatants, and improving the welfare of host communities, but used up a disproportionately large share of resources that could have been better used to assist other groups that were not covered by the programme. In such a case, a lack of programme efficiency limited the potential scope of its impact.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66475,7 +66475,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1190, - "Paragraph": "Given the broad scope of DDR programmes, and the differences in strategies, objectives and context, it is difficult to identify specific or generic (i.e., general) results or indicators for evaluating DDR programmes. A more meaningful approach is to identify the various types of impacts or issues to be analysed, and to construct composite (i.e., a group of) indi\u00ad cators as part of an overall methodological approach to evaluating the programme. The following factors usually form the basis from which an evaluation\u2019s focus is defined: \\n Relevance describes the extent to which the objectives of a programme or project remain valid and pertinent (relevant) as originally planned, or as modified owing to changing circumstances within the immediate context and external environment of that pro\u00ad gramme or project. Relevance can also include the suitability of a particular strategy or approach for dealing with a specific problem or issue. A DDR\u00adspecific evaluation could focus on the relevance of cantonment\u00adbased demobilization strategies, for instance, in comparison with other approaches (e.g., decentralized registration of combatants) that perhaps could have more effectively achieved the same objectives; \\n Sustainability involves the success of a strategy in continuing to achieve its initial objec\u00ad tives even after the end of a programme, i.e., whether it has a long\u00adlasting effect. In a DDR programme, this is most important in determining the long\u00adterm viability and effectiveness of reintegration assistance and the extent to which it ensures that ex\u00ad combatants remain in civilian life and do not return to military or violence\u00adbased livelihoods. Indicators in such a methodology include the viability of alternative eco\u00ad nomic livelihoods, behavioural change among ex\u00adcombatants, and so forth; \\n Impact includes the immediate and long\u00adterm consequences of an intervention on the place in which it is implemented, and on the lives of those who are assisted or who benefit from the programme. Evaluating the impact of DDR includes focusing on the immediate social and economic effects of the return of ex\u00adcombatants and their inte\u00ad gration into social and economic life, and the attitudes of communities and the specific direct or indirect effects of these on the lives of individuals; \\n Effectiveness measures the extent to which a programme has been successful in achieving its key objectives. The measurement of effectiveness can be quite specific (e.g., the success of a DDR programme in demobilizing and reintegrating the majority of ex\u00ad combatants) or can be defined in broad or strategic terms (e.g., the extent to which a DDR programme has lowered political tensions, reduced levels of insecurity or improved the well\u00adbeing of host communities); \\n Efficiency refers to how well a given DDR programme and strategy transformed inputs into results and outputs. This is a different way of focusing on the impact of a pro\u00ad gramme, because it places more emphasis on how economically resources were used to achieve specific outcomes. In certain cases, a DDR programme might have been successful in demobilizing and reintegrating a significant number of ex\u00adcombatants, and improving the welfare of host communities, but used up a disproportionately large share of resources that could have been better used to assist other groups that were not covered by the programme. In such a case, a lack of programme efficiency limited the potential scope of its impact.", + "Paragraph": "Given the broad scope of DDR programmes, and the differences in strategies, objectives and context, it is difficult to identify specific or generic (i.e., general) results or indicators for evaluating DDR programmes. A more meaningful approach is to identify the various types of impacts or issues to be analysed, and to construct composite (i.e., a group of) indi\u00ad cators as part of an overall methodological approach to evaluating the programme. The following factors usually form the basis from which an evaluation\u2019s focus is defined: \n Relevance describes the extent to which the objectives of a programme or project remain valid and pertinent (relevant) as originally planned, or as modified owing to changing circumstances within the immediate context and external environment of that pro\u00ad gramme or project. Relevance can also include the suitability of a particular strategy or approach for dealing with a specific problem or issue. A DDR\u00adspecific evaluation could focus on the relevance of cantonment\u00adbased demobilization strategies, for instance, in comparison with other approaches (e.g., decentralized registration of combatants) that perhaps could have more effectively achieved the same objectives; \n Sustainability involves the success of a strategy in continuing to achieve its initial objec\u00ad tives even after the end of a programme, i.e., whether it has a long\u00adlasting effect. In a DDR programme, this is most important in determining the long\u00adterm viability and effectiveness of reintegration assistance and the extent to which it ensures that ex\u00ad combatants remain in civilian life and do not return to military or violence\u00adbased livelihoods. Indicators in such a methodology include the viability of alternative eco\u00ad nomic livelihoods, behavioural change among ex\u00adcombatants, and so forth; \n Impact includes the immediate and long\u00adterm consequences of an intervention on the place in which it is implemented, and on the lives of those who are assisted or who benefit from the programme. Evaluating the impact of DDR includes focusing on the immediate social and economic effects of the return of ex\u00adcombatants and their inte\u00ad gration into social and economic life, and the attitudes of communities and the specific direct or indirect effects of these on the lives of individuals; \n Effectiveness measures the extent to which a programme has been successful in achieving its key objectives. The measurement of effectiveness can be quite specific (e.g., the success of a DDR programme in demobilizing and reintegrating the majority of ex\u00ad combatants) or can be defined in broad or strategic terms (e.g., the extent to which a DDR programme has lowered political tensions, reduced levels of insecurity or improved the well\u00adbeing of host communities); \n Efficiency refers to how well a given DDR programme and strategy transformed inputs into results and outputs. This is a different way of focusing on the impact of a pro\u00ad gramme, because it places more emphasis on how economically resources were used to achieve specific outcomes. In certain cases, a DDR programme might have been successful in demobilizing and reintegrating a significant number of ex\u00adcombatants, and improving the welfare of host communities, but used up a disproportionately large share of resources that could have been better used to assist other groups that were not covered by the programme. In such a case, a lack of programme efficiency limited the potential scope of its impact.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66493,7 +66493,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1190, - "Paragraph": "Given the broad scope of DDR programmes, and the differences in strategies, objectives and context, it is difficult to identify specific or generic (i.e., general) results or indicators for evaluating DDR programmes. A more meaningful approach is to identify the various types of impacts or issues to be analysed, and to construct composite (i.e., a group of) indi\u00ad cators as part of an overall methodological approach to evaluating the programme. The following factors usually form the basis from which an evaluation\u2019s focus is defined: \\n Relevance describes the extent to which the objectives of a programme or project remain valid and pertinent (relevant) as originally planned, or as modified owing to changing circumstances within the immediate context and external environment of that pro\u00ad gramme or project. Relevance can also include the suitability of a particular strategy or approach for dealing with a specific problem or issue. A DDR\u00adspecific evaluation could focus on the relevance of cantonment\u00adbased demobilization strategies, for instance, in comparison with other approaches (e.g., decentralized registration of combatants) that perhaps could have more effectively achieved the same objectives; \\n Sustainability involves the success of a strategy in continuing to achieve its initial objec\u00ad tives even after the end of a programme, i.e., whether it has a long\u00adlasting effect. In a DDR programme, this is most important in determining the long\u00adterm viability and effectiveness of reintegration assistance and the extent to which it ensures that ex\u00ad combatants remain in civilian life and do not return to military or violence\u00adbased livelihoods. Indicators in such a methodology include the viability of alternative eco\u00ad nomic livelihoods, behavioural change among ex\u00adcombatants, and so forth; \\n Impact includes the immediate and long\u00adterm consequences of an intervention on the place in which it is implemented, and on the lives of those who are assisted or who benefit from the programme. Evaluating the impact of DDR includes focusing on the immediate social and economic effects of the return of ex\u00adcombatants and their inte\u00ad gration into social and economic life, and the attitudes of communities and the specific direct or indirect effects of these on the lives of individuals; \\n Effectiveness measures the extent to which a programme has been successful in achieving its key objectives. The measurement of effectiveness can be quite specific (e.g., the success of a DDR programme in demobilizing and reintegrating the majority of ex\u00ad combatants) or can be defined in broad or strategic terms (e.g., the extent to which a DDR programme has lowered political tensions, reduced levels of insecurity or improved the well\u00adbeing of host communities); \\n Efficiency refers to how well a given DDR programme and strategy transformed inputs into results and outputs. This is a different way of focusing on the impact of a pro\u00ad gramme, because it places more emphasis on how economically resources were used to achieve specific outcomes. In certain cases, a DDR programme might have been successful in demobilizing and reintegrating a significant number of ex\u00adcombatants, and improving the welfare of host communities, but used up a disproportionately large share of resources that could have been better used to assist other groups that were not covered by the programme. In such a case, a lack of programme efficiency limited the potential scope of its impact.", + "Paragraph": "Given the broad scope of DDR programmes, and the differences in strategies, objectives and context, it is difficult to identify specific or generic (i.e., general) results or indicators for evaluating DDR programmes. A more meaningful approach is to identify the various types of impacts or issues to be analysed, and to construct composite (i.e., a group of) indi\u00ad cators as part of an overall methodological approach to evaluating the programme. The following factors usually form the basis from which an evaluation\u2019s focus is defined: \n Relevance describes the extent to which the objectives of a programme or project remain valid and pertinent (relevant) as originally planned, or as modified owing to changing circumstances within the immediate context and external environment of that pro\u00ad gramme or project. Relevance can also include the suitability of a particular strategy or approach for dealing with a specific problem or issue. A DDR\u00adspecific evaluation could focus on the relevance of cantonment\u00adbased demobilization strategies, for instance, in comparison with other approaches (e.g., decentralized registration of combatants) that perhaps could have more effectively achieved the same objectives; \n Sustainability involves the success of a strategy in continuing to achieve its initial objec\u00ad tives even after the end of a programme, i.e., whether it has a long\u00adlasting effect. In a DDR programme, this is most important in determining the long\u00adterm viability and effectiveness of reintegration assistance and the extent to which it ensures that ex\u00ad combatants remain in civilian life and do not return to military or violence\u00adbased livelihoods. Indicators in such a methodology include the viability of alternative eco\u00ad nomic livelihoods, behavioural change among ex\u00adcombatants, and so forth; \n Impact includes the immediate and long\u00adterm consequences of an intervention on the place in which it is implemented, and on the lives of those who are assisted or who benefit from the programme. Evaluating the impact of DDR includes focusing on the immediate social and economic effects of the return of ex\u00adcombatants and their inte\u00ad gration into social and economic life, and the attitudes of communities and the specific direct or indirect effects of these on the lives of individuals; \n Effectiveness measures the extent to which a programme has been successful in achieving its key objectives. The measurement of effectiveness can be quite specific (e.g., the success of a DDR programme in demobilizing and reintegrating the majority of ex\u00ad combatants) or can be defined in broad or strategic terms (e.g., the extent to which a DDR programme has lowered political tensions, reduced levels of insecurity or improved the well\u00adbeing of host communities); \n Efficiency refers to how well a given DDR programme and strategy transformed inputs into results and outputs. This is a different way of focusing on the impact of a pro\u00ad gramme, because it places more emphasis on how economically resources were used to achieve specific outcomes. In certain cases, a DDR programme might have been successful in demobilizing and reintegrating a significant number of ex\u00adcombatants, and improving the welfare of host communities, but used up a disproportionately large share of resources that could have been better used to assist other groups that were not covered by the programme. In such a case, a lack of programme efficiency limited the potential scope of its impact.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66511,7 +66511,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1191, - "Paragraph": "In general, the results and conclusions of evaluations should be used in several important and strategic ways: \\n A key function of evaluations is to enable practitioners and programme managers to identify, capture and disseminate lessons learned from programme implementation. This can have an immediate operational benefit, as these lessons can be \u2018fed back\u2019 to the programme implementation process, but it can also contribute to the body of lessons learned on DDR at regional and global levels; \\n Evaluations can also provide important mechanisms for identifying and institutional\u00ad izing best practice by identifying effective models, strategies and techniques that can be applied in other contexts; innovative approaches to dealing with outstanding problems; or linking DDR to other processes such as local peace\u00adbuilding, access to justice, and so forth; \\n Evaluation results also enable practitioners and managers to refine and further develop their programme strategy. This is particularly useful when programmes are designed to be implemented in phases, which allows for the assessment and identification of problems and best practice at the end of each phase, which can then be fed into later phases; \\n Evaluations also contribute to discussions between policy makers and practitioners on the further development of international and regional policies on DDR, by providing them with information and analyses that influence the way key policy issues can be dealt with and decisions reached. Evaluations can provide invaluable support to the elaboration of future policy frameworks for DDR.", + "Paragraph": "In general, the results and conclusions of evaluations should be used in several important and strategic ways: \n A key function of evaluations is to enable practitioners and programme managers to identify, capture and disseminate lessons learned from programme implementation. This can have an immediate operational benefit, as these lessons can be \u2018fed back\u2019 to the programme implementation process, but it can also contribute to the body of lessons learned on DDR at regional and global levels; \n Evaluations can also provide important mechanisms for identifying and institutional\u00ad izing best practice by identifying effective models, strategies and techniques that can be applied in other contexts; innovative approaches to dealing with outstanding problems; or linking DDR to other processes such as local peace\u00adbuilding, access to justice, and so forth; \n Evaluation results also enable practitioners and managers to refine and further develop their programme strategy. This is particularly useful when programmes are designed to be implemented in phases, which allows for the assessment and identification of problems and best practice at the end of each phase, which can then be fed into later phases; \n Evaluations also contribute to discussions between policy makers and practitioners on the further development of international and regional policies on DDR, by providing them with information and analyses that influence the way key policy issues can be dealt with and decisions reached. Evaluations can provide invaluable support to the elaboration of future policy frameworks for DDR.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66522,14 +66522,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.4. Use of evaluation results", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "In general, the results and conclusions of evaluations should be used in several important and strategic ways: \\n A key function of evaluations is to enable practitioners and programme managers to identify, capture and disseminate lessons learned from programme implementation.", + "Sentence": "In general, the results and conclusions of evaluations should be used in several important and strategic ways: \n A key function of evaluations is to enable practitioners and programme managers to identify, capture and disseminate lessons learned from programme implementation.", "newParagraph": "general result conclusion evaluation used several important strategic way n key function evaluation enable practitioner programme manager identify capture disseminate lesson learned programme implementation immediate operational benefit lesson fed back programme implementation process also contribute body lesson learned ddr regional global level n evaluation also provide important mechanism identifying institutional izing best practice identifying effective model strategy technique applied context innovative approach dealing outstanding problem linking ddr process local peace building access justice forth n evaluation result also enable practitioner manager refine develop programme strategy particularly useful programme designed implemented phase allows assessment identification problem best practice end phase fed later phase n evaluation also contribute discussion policy maker practitioner development international regional policy ddr providing information analysis influence way key policy issue dealt decision reached evaluation provide invaluable support elaboration future policy framework ddr", "ProcessedSent": "general result conclusion evaluation used several important strategic way n key function evaluation enable practitioner programme manager identify capture disseminate lesson learned programme implementation", "SentID": 3695 }, { "ParagraphID": 1191, - "Paragraph": "In general, the results and conclusions of evaluations should be used in several important and strategic ways: \\n A key function of evaluations is to enable practitioners and programme managers to identify, capture and disseminate lessons learned from programme implementation. This can have an immediate operational benefit, as these lessons can be \u2018fed back\u2019 to the programme implementation process, but it can also contribute to the body of lessons learned on DDR at regional and global levels; \\n Evaluations can also provide important mechanisms for identifying and institutional\u00ad izing best practice by identifying effective models, strategies and techniques that can be applied in other contexts; innovative approaches to dealing with outstanding problems; or linking DDR to other processes such as local peace\u00adbuilding, access to justice, and so forth; \\n Evaluation results also enable practitioners and managers to refine and further develop their programme strategy. This is particularly useful when programmes are designed to be implemented in phases, which allows for the assessment and identification of problems and best practice at the end of each phase, which can then be fed into later phases; \\n Evaluations also contribute to discussions between policy makers and practitioners on the further development of international and regional policies on DDR, by providing them with information and analyses that influence the way key policy issues can be dealt with and decisions reached. Evaluations can provide invaluable support to the elaboration of future policy frameworks for DDR.", + "Paragraph": "In general, the results and conclusions of evaluations should be used in several important and strategic ways: \n A key function of evaluations is to enable practitioners and programme managers to identify, capture and disseminate lessons learned from programme implementation. This can have an immediate operational benefit, as these lessons can be \u2018fed back\u2019 to the programme implementation process, but it can also contribute to the body of lessons learned on DDR at regional and global levels; \n Evaluations can also provide important mechanisms for identifying and institutional\u00ad izing best practice by identifying effective models, strategies and techniques that can be applied in other contexts; innovative approaches to dealing with outstanding problems; or linking DDR to other processes such as local peace\u00adbuilding, access to justice, and so forth; \n Evaluation results also enable practitioners and managers to refine and further develop their programme strategy. This is particularly useful when programmes are designed to be implemented in phases, which allows for the assessment and identification of problems and best practice at the end of each phase, which can then be fed into later phases; \n Evaluations also contribute to discussions between policy makers and practitioners on the further development of international and regional policies on DDR, by providing them with information and analyses that influence the way key policy issues can be dealt with and decisions reached. Evaluations can provide invaluable support to the elaboration of future policy frameworks for DDR.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66540,14 +66540,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.4. Use of evaluation results", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This can have an immediate operational benefit, as these lessons can be \u2018fed back\u2019 to the programme implementation process, but it can also contribute to the body of lessons learned on DDR at regional and global levels; \\n Evaluations can also provide important mechanisms for identifying and institutional\u00ad izing best practice by identifying effective models, strategies and techniques that can be applied in other contexts; innovative approaches to dealing with outstanding problems; or linking DDR to other processes such as local peace\u00adbuilding, access to justice, and so forth; \\n Evaluation results also enable practitioners and managers to refine and further develop their programme strategy.", + "Sentence": "This can have an immediate operational benefit, as these lessons can be \u2018fed back\u2019 to the programme implementation process, but it can also contribute to the body of lessons learned on DDR at regional and global levels; \n Evaluations can also provide important mechanisms for identifying and institutional\u00ad izing best practice by identifying effective models, strategies and techniques that can be applied in other contexts; innovative approaches to dealing with outstanding problems; or linking DDR to other processes such as local peace\u00adbuilding, access to justice, and so forth; \n Evaluation results also enable practitioners and managers to refine and further develop their programme strategy.", "newParagraph": "general result conclusion evaluation used several important strategic way n key function evaluation enable practitioner programme manager identify capture disseminate lesson learned programme implementation immediate operational benefit lesson fed back programme implementation process also contribute body lesson learned ddr regional global level n evaluation also provide important mechanism identifying institutional izing best practice identifying effective model strategy technique applied context innovative approach dealing outstanding problem linking ddr process local peace building access justice forth n evaluation result also enable practitioner manager refine develop programme strategy particularly useful programme designed implemented phase allows assessment identification problem best practice end phase fed later phase n evaluation also contribute discussion policy maker practitioner development international regional policy ddr providing information analysis influence way key policy issue dealt decision reached evaluation provide invaluable support elaboration future policy framework ddr", "ProcessedSent": "immediate operational benefit lesson fed back programme implementation process also contribute body lesson learned ddr regional global level n evaluation also provide important mechanism identifying institutional izing best practice identifying effective model strategy technique applied context innovative approach dealing outstanding problem linking ddr process local peace building access justice forth n evaluation result also enable practitioner manager refine develop programme strategy", "SentID": 3696 }, { "ParagraphID": 1191, - "Paragraph": "In general, the results and conclusions of evaluations should be used in several important and strategic ways: \\n A key function of evaluations is to enable practitioners and programme managers to identify, capture and disseminate lessons learned from programme implementation. This can have an immediate operational benefit, as these lessons can be \u2018fed back\u2019 to the programme implementation process, but it can also contribute to the body of lessons learned on DDR at regional and global levels; \\n Evaluations can also provide important mechanisms for identifying and institutional\u00ad izing best practice by identifying effective models, strategies and techniques that can be applied in other contexts; innovative approaches to dealing with outstanding problems; or linking DDR to other processes such as local peace\u00adbuilding, access to justice, and so forth; \\n Evaluation results also enable practitioners and managers to refine and further develop their programme strategy. This is particularly useful when programmes are designed to be implemented in phases, which allows for the assessment and identification of problems and best practice at the end of each phase, which can then be fed into later phases; \\n Evaluations also contribute to discussions between policy makers and practitioners on the further development of international and regional policies on DDR, by providing them with information and analyses that influence the way key policy issues can be dealt with and decisions reached. Evaluations can provide invaluable support to the elaboration of future policy frameworks for DDR.", + "Paragraph": "In general, the results and conclusions of evaluations should be used in several important and strategic ways: \n A key function of evaluations is to enable practitioners and programme managers to identify, capture and disseminate lessons learned from programme implementation. This can have an immediate operational benefit, as these lessons can be \u2018fed back\u2019 to the programme implementation process, but it can also contribute to the body of lessons learned on DDR at regional and global levels; \n Evaluations can also provide important mechanisms for identifying and institutional\u00ad izing best practice by identifying effective models, strategies and techniques that can be applied in other contexts; innovative approaches to dealing with outstanding problems; or linking DDR to other processes such as local peace\u00adbuilding, access to justice, and so forth; \n Evaluation results also enable practitioners and managers to refine and further develop their programme strategy. This is particularly useful when programmes are designed to be implemented in phases, which allows for the assessment and identification of problems and best practice at the end of each phase, which can then be fed into later phases; \n Evaluations also contribute to discussions between policy makers and practitioners on the further development of international and regional policies on DDR, by providing them with information and analyses that influence the way key policy issues can be dealt with and decisions reached. Evaluations can provide invaluable support to the elaboration of future policy frameworks for DDR.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66558,14 +66558,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.4. Use of evaluation results", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This is particularly useful when programmes are designed to be implemented in phases, which allows for the assessment and identification of problems and best practice at the end of each phase, which can then be fed into later phases; \\n Evaluations also contribute to discussions between policy makers and practitioners on the further development of international and regional policies on DDR, by providing them with information and analyses that influence the way key policy issues can be dealt with and decisions reached.", + "Sentence": "This is particularly useful when programmes are designed to be implemented in phases, which allows for the assessment and identification of problems and best practice at the end of each phase, which can then be fed into later phases; \n Evaluations also contribute to discussions between policy makers and practitioners on the further development of international and regional policies on DDR, by providing them with information and analyses that influence the way key policy issues can be dealt with and decisions reached.", "newParagraph": "general result conclusion evaluation used several important strategic way n key function evaluation enable practitioner programme manager identify capture disseminate lesson learned programme implementation immediate operational benefit lesson fed back programme implementation process also contribute body lesson learned ddr regional global level n evaluation also provide important mechanism identifying institutional izing best practice identifying effective model strategy technique applied context innovative approach dealing outstanding problem linking ddr process local peace building access justice forth n evaluation result also enable practitioner manager refine develop programme strategy particularly useful programme designed implemented phase allows assessment identification problem best practice end phase fed later phase n evaluation also contribute discussion policy maker practitioner development international regional policy ddr providing information analysis influence way key policy issue dealt decision reached evaluation provide invaluable support elaboration future policy framework ddr", "ProcessedSent": "particularly useful programme designed implemented phase allows assessment identification problem best practice end phase fed later phase n evaluation also contribute discussion policy maker practitioner development international regional policy ddr providing information analysis influence way key policy issue dealt decision reached", "SentID": 3697 }, { "ParagraphID": 1191, - "Paragraph": "In general, the results and conclusions of evaluations should be used in several important and strategic ways: \\n A key function of evaluations is to enable practitioners and programme managers to identify, capture and disseminate lessons learned from programme implementation. This can have an immediate operational benefit, as these lessons can be \u2018fed back\u2019 to the programme implementation process, but it can also contribute to the body of lessons learned on DDR at regional and global levels; \\n Evaluations can also provide important mechanisms for identifying and institutional\u00ad izing best practice by identifying effective models, strategies and techniques that can be applied in other contexts; innovative approaches to dealing with outstanding problems; or linking DDR to other processes such as local peace\u00adbuilding, access to justice, and so forth; \\n Evaluation results also enable practitioners and managers to refine and further develop their programme strategy. This is particularly useful when programmes are designed to be implemented in phases, which allows for the assessment and identification of problems and best practice at the end of each phase, which can then be fed into later phases; \\n Evaluations also contribute to discussions between policy makers and practitioners on the further development of international and regional policies on DDR, by providing them with information and analyses that influence the way key policy issues can be dealt with and decisions reached. Evaluations can provide invaluable support to the elaboration of future policy frameworks for DDR.", + "Paragraph": "In general, the results and conclusions of evaluations should be used in several important and strategic ways: \n A key function of evaluations is to enable practitioners and programme managers to identify, capture and disseminate lessons learned from programme implementation. This can have an immediate operational benefit, as these lessons can be \u2018fed back\u2019 to the programme implementation process, but it can also contribute to the body of lessons learned on DDR at regional and global levels; \n Evaluations can also provide important mechanisms for identifying and institutional\u00ad izing best practice by identifying effective models, strategies and techniques that can be applied in other contexts; innovative approaches to dealing with outstanding problems; or linking DDR to other processes such as local peace\u00adbuilding, access to justice, and so forth; \n Evaluation results also enable practitioners and managers to refine and further develop their programme strategy. This is particularly useful when programmes are designed to be implemented in phases, which allows for the assessment and identification of problems and best practice at the end of each phase, which can then be fed into later phases; \n Evaluations also contribute to discussions between policy makers and practitioners on the further development of international and regional policies on DDR, by providing them with information and analyses that influence the way key policy issues can be dealt with and decisions reached. Evaluations can provide invaluable support to the elaboration of future policy frameworks for DDR.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66583,7 +66583,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1192, - "Paragraph": "The complexity of DDR and the specific skills needed for in\u00addepth and comprehensive evaluations usually means that this activity should be carried out by specialized, contracted external actors or partners. Because an external team will be brought in, it is essential to draw up precise terms of reference for the carrying out of the evaluation, and to be clear about how the overall objective and coverage of issues will be defined\/expressed. An evaluation terms of reference document includes the following sections: \\n Introduction: Contains a brief description of the rationale and focus of the evaluation (outcome, programme, project, series of interventions by several partners, etc.); \\n Objectives: Describes the purpose of the evaluation, e.g., \u201cto analyse strategic program\u00ad matic and policy dimensions\u201d; \\n Scope: Defines which issues, subjects and areas the evaluation will cover, and the period of the programme\u2019s life it will examine; \\n Expected results: Defines what results the evaluation is expected to produce (e.g., findings, recommendations, lessons learned, rating on performance, an \u2018action item\u2019 list, etc.); \\n Methodology or approach: Defines how data is collected and analysed for the evaluation; \\n Evaluation team: Defines the composition of the staff involved and their areas of expertise; \\n Management arrangements: Defines how the evaluation will be managed and organized, and how interactions with the DDR programme management will be structured.", + "Paragraph": "The complexity of DDR and the specific skills needed for in\u00addepth and comprehensive evaluations usually means that this activity should be carried out by specialized, contracted external actors or partners. Because an external team will be brought in, it is essential to draw up precise terms of reference for the carrying out of the evaluation, and to be clear about how the overall objective and coverage of issues will be defined\/expressed. An evaluation terms of reference document includes the following sections: \n Introduction: Contains a brief description of the rationale and focus of the evaluation (outcome, programme, project, series of interventions by several partners, etc.); \n Objectives: Describes the purpose of the evaluation, e.g., \u201cto analyse strategic program\u00ad matic and policy dimensions\u201d; \n Scope: Defines which issues, subjects and areas the evaluation will cover, and the period of the programme\u2019s life it will examine; \n Expected results: Defines what results the evaluation is expected to produce (e.g., findings, recommendations, lessons learned, rating on performance, an \u2018action item\u2019 list, etc.); \n Methodology or approach: Defines how data is collected and analysed for the evaluation; \n Evaluation team: Defines the composition of the staff involved and their areas of expertise; \n Management arrangements: Defines how the evaluation will be managed and organized, and how interactions with the DDR programme management will be structured.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66601,7 +66601,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1192, - "Paragraph": "The complexity of DDR and the specific skills needed for in\u00addepth and comprehensive evaluations usually means that this activity should be carried out by specialized, contracted external actors or partners. Because an external team will be brought in, it is essential to draw up precise terms of reference for the carrying out of the evaluation, and to be clear about how the overall objective and coverage of issues will be defined\/expressed. An evaluation terms of reference document includes the following sections: \\n Introduction: Contains a brief description of the rationale and focus of the evaluation (outcome, programme, project, series of interventions by several partners, etc.); \\n Objectives: Describes the purpose of the evaluation, e.g., \u201cto analyse strategic program\u00ad matic and policy dimensions\u201d; \\n Scope: Defines which issues, subjects and areas the evaluation will cover, and the period of the programme\u2019s life it will examine; \\n Expected results: Defines what results the evaluation is expected to produce (e.g., findings, recommendations, lessons learned, rating on performance, an \u2018action item\u2019 list, etc.); \\n Methodology or approach: Defines how data is collected and analysed for the evaluation; \\n Evaluation team: Defines the composition of the staff involved and their areas of expertise; \\n Management arrangements: Defines how the evaluation will be managed and organized, and how interactions with the DDR programme management will be structured.", + "Paragraph": "The complexity of DDR and the specific skills needed for in\u00addepth and comprehensive evaluations usually means that this activity should be carried out by specialized, contracted external actors or partners. Because an external team will be brought in, it is essential to draw up precise terms of reference for the carrying out of the evaluation, and to be clear about how the overall objective and coverage of issues will be defined\/expressed. An evaluation terms of reference document includes the following sections: \n Introduction: Contains a brief description of the rationale and focus of the evaluation (outcome, programme, project, series of interventions by several partners, etc.); \n Objectives: Describes the purpose of the evaluation, e.g., \u201cto analyse strategic program\u00ad matic and policy dimensions\u201d; \n Scope: Defines which issues, subjects and areas the evaluation will cover, and the period of the programme\u2019s life it will examine; \n Expected results: Defines what results the evaluation is expected to produce (e.g., findings, recommendations, lessons learned, rating on performance, an \u2018action item\u2019 list, etc.); \n Methodology or approach: Defines how data is collected and analysed for the evaluation; \n Evaluation team: Defines the composition of the staff involved and their areas of expertise; \n Management arrangements: Defines how the evaluation will be managed and organized, and how interactions with the DDR programme management will be structured.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66619,7 +66619,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1192, - "Paragraph": "The complexity of DDR and the specific skills needed for in\u00addepth and comprehensive evaluations usually means that this activity should be carried out by specialized, contracted external actors or partners. Because an external team will be brought in, it is essential to draw up precise terms of reference for the carrying out of the evaluation, and to be clear about how the overall objective and coverage of issues will be defined\/expressed. An evaluation terms of reference document includes the following sections: \\n Introduction: Contains a brief description of the rationale and focus of the evaluation (outcome, programme, project, series of interventions by several partners, etc.); \\n Objectives: Describes the purpose of the evaluation, e.g., \u201cto analyse strategic program\u00ad matic and policy dimensions\u201d; \\n Scope: Defines which issues, subjects and areas the evaluation will cover, and the period of the programme\u2019s life it will examine; \\n Expected results: Defines what results the evaluation is expected to produce (e.g., findings, recommendations, lessons learned, rating on performance, an \u2018action item\u2019 list, etc.); \\n Methodology or approach: Defines how data is collected and analysed for the evaluation; \\n Evaluation team: Defines the composition of the staff involved and their areas of expertise; \\n Management arrangements: Defines how the evaluation will be managed and organized, and how interactions with the DDR programme management will be structured.", + "Paragraph": "The complexity of DDR and the specific skills needed for in\u00addepth and comprehensive evaluations usually means that this activity should be carried out by specialized, contracted external actors or partners. Because an external team will be brought in, it is essential to draw up precise terms of reference for the carrying out of the evaluation, and to be clear about how the overall objective and coverage of issues will be defined\/expressed. An evaluation terms of reference document includes the following sections: \n Introduction: Contains a brief description of the rationale and focus of the evaluation (outcome, programme, project, series of interventions by several partners, etc.); \n Objectives: Describes the purpose of the evaluation, e.g., \u201cto analyse strategic program\u00ad matic and policy dimensions\u201d; \n Scope: Defines which issues, subjects and areas the evaluation will cover, and the period of the programme\u2019s life it will examine; \n Expected results: Defines what results the evaluation is expected to produce (e.g., findings, recommendations, lessons learned, rating on performance, an \u2018action item\u2019 list, etc.); \n Methodology or approach: Defines how data is collected and analysed for the evaluation; \n Evaluation team: Defines the composition of the staff involved and their areas of expertise; \n Management arrangements: Defines how the evaluation will be managed and organized, and how interactions with the DDR programme management will be structured.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66630,14 +66630,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.5. Planning evaluations", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "An evaluation terms of reference document includes the following sections: \\n Introduction: Contains a brief description of the rationale and focus of the evaluation (outcome, programme, project, series of interventions by several partners, etc.", + "Sentence": "An evaluation terms of reference document includes the following sections: \n Introduction: Contains a brief description of the rationale and focus of the evaluation (outcome, programme, project, series of interventions by several partners, etc.", "newParagraph": "complexity ddr specific skill needed depth comprehensive evaluation usually mean activity carried specialized contracted external actor partner external team brought essential draw precise term reference carrying evaluation clear overall objective coverage issue definedexpressed evaluation term reference document includes following section n introduction contains brief description rationale focus evaluation outcome programme project series intervention several partner etc n objective describes purpose evaluation eg analyse strategic program matic policy dimension n scope defines issue subject area evaluation cover period programme life examine n expected result defines result evaluation expected produce eg finding recommendation lesson learned rating performance action item list etc n methodology approach defines data collected analysed evaluation n evaluation team defines composition staff involved area expertise n management arrangement defines evaluation managed organized interaction ddr programme management structured", "ProcessedSent": "evaluation term reference document includes following section n introduction contains brief description rationale focus evaluation outcome programme project series intervention several partner etc", "SentID": 3701 }, { "ParagraphID": 1192, - "Paragraph": "The complexity of DDR and the specific skills needed for in\u00addepth and comprehensive evaluations usually means that this activity should be carried out by specialized, contracted external actors or partners. Because an external team will be brought in, it is essential to draw up precise terms of reference for the carrying out of the evaluation, and to be clear about how the overall objective and coverage of issues will be defined\/expressed. An evaluation terms of reference document includes the following sections: \\n Introduction: Contains a brief description of the rationale and focus of the evaluation (outcome, programme, project, series of interventions by several partners, etc.); \\n Objectives: Describes the purpose of the evaluation, e.g., \u201cto analyse strategic program\u00ad matic and policy dimensions\u201d; \\n Scope: Defines which issues, subjects and areas the evaluation will cover, and the period of the programme\u2019s life it will examine; \\n Expected results: Defines what results the evaluation is expected to produce (e.g., findings, recommendations, lessons learned, rating on performance, an \u2018action item\u2019 list, etc.); \\n Methodology or approach: Defines how data is collected and analysed for the evaluation; \\n Evaluation team: Defines the composition of the staff involved and their areas of expertise; \\n Management arrangements: Defines how the evaluation will be managed and organized, and how interactions with the DDR programme management will be structured.", + "Paragraph": "The complexity of DDR and the specific skills needed for in\u00addepth and comprehensive evaluations usually means that this activity should be carried out by specialized, contracted external actors or partners. Because an external team will be brought in, it is essential to draw up precise terms of reference for the carrying out of the evaluation, and to be clear about how the overall objective and coverage of issues will be defined\/expressed. An evaluation terms of reference document includes the following sections: \n Introduction: Contains a brief description of the rationale and focus of the evaluation (outcome, programme, project, series of interventions by several partners, etc.); \n Objectives: Describes the purpose of the evaluation, e.g., \u201cto analyse strategic program\u00ad matic and policy dimensions\u201d; \n Scope: Defines which issues, subjects and areas the evaluation will cover, and the period of the programme\u2019s life it will examine; \n Expected results: Defines what results the evaluation is expected to produce (e.g., findings, recommendations, lessons learned, rating on performance, an \u2018action item\u2019 list, etc.); \n Methodology or approach: Defines how data is collected and analysed for the evaluation; \n Evaluation team: Defines the composition of the staff involved and their areas of expertise; \n Management arrangements: Defines how the evaluation will be managed and organized, and how interactions with the DDR programme management will be structured.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66648,14 +66648,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.5. Planning evaluations", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "); \\n Objectives: Describes the purpose of the evaluation, e.g., \u201cto analyse strategic program\u00ad matic and policy dimensions\u201d; \\n Scope: Defines which issues, subjects and areas the evaluation will cover, and the period of the programme\u2019s life it will examine; \\n Expected results: Defines what results the evaluation is expected to produce (e.g., findings, recommendations, lessons learned, rating on performance, an \u2018action item\u2019 list, etc.", + "Sentence": "); \n Objectives: Describes the purpose of the evaluation, e.g., \u201cto analyse strategic program\u00ad matic and policy dimensions\u201d; \n Scope: Defines which issues, subjects and areas the evaluation will cover, and the period of the programme\u2019s life it will examine; \n Expected results: Defines what results the evaluation is expected to produce (e.g., findings, recommendations, lessons learned, rating on performance, an \u2018action item\u2019 list, etc.", "newParagraph": "complexity ddr specific skill needed depth comprehensive evaluation usually mean activity carried specialized contracted external actor partner external team brought essential draw precise term reference carrying evaluation clear overall objective coverage issue definedexpressed evaluation term reference document includes following section n introduction contains brief description rationale focus evaluation outcome programme project series intervention several partner etc n objective describes purpose evaluation eg analyse strategic program matic policy dimension n scope defines issue subject area evaluation cover period programme life examine n expected result defines result evaluation expected produce eg finding recommendation lesson learned rating performance action item list etc n methodology approach defines data collected analysed evaluation n evaluation team defines composition staff involved area expertise n management arrangement defines evaluation managed organized interaction ddr programme management structured", "ProcessedSent": " n objective describes purpose evaluation eg analyse strategic program matic policy dimension n scope defines issue subject area evaluation cover period programme life examine n expected result defines result evaluation expected produce eg finding recommendation lesson learned rating performance action item list etc", "SentID": 3702 }, { "ParagraphID": 1192, - "Paragraph": "The complexity of DDR and the specific skills needed for in\u00addepth and comprehensive evaluations usually means that this activity should be carried out by specialized, contracted external actors or partners. Because an external team will be brought in, it is essential to draw up precise terms of reference for the carrying out of the evaluation, and to be clear about how the overall objective and coverage of issues will be defined\/expressed. An evaluation terms of reference document includes the following sections: \\n Introduction: Contains a brief description of the rationale and focus of the evaluation (outcome, programme, project, series of interventions by several partners, etc.); \\n Objectives: Describes the purpose of the evaluation, e.g., \u201cto analyse strategic program\u00ad matic and policy dimensions\u201d; \\n Scope: Defines which issues, subjects and areas the evaluation will cover, and the period of the programme\u2019s life it will examine; \\n Expected results: Defines what results the evaluation is expected to produce (e.g., findings, recommendations, lessons learned, rating on performance, an \u2018action item\u2019 list, etc.); \\n Methodology or approach: Defines how data is collected and analysed for the evaluation; \\n Evaluation team: Defines the composition of the staff involved and their areas of expertise; \\n Management arrangements: Defines how the evaluation will be managed and organized, and how interactions with the DDR programme management will be structured.", + "Paragraph": "The complexity of DDR and the specific skills needed for in\u00addepth and comprehensive evaluations usually means that this activity should be carried out by specialized, contracted external actors or partners. Because an external team will be brought in, it is essential to draw up precise terms of reference for the carrying out of the evaluation, and to be clear about how the overall objective and coverage of issues will be defined\/expressed. An evaluation terms of reference document includes the following sections: \n Introduction: Contains a brief description of the rationale and focus of the evaluation (outcome, programme, project, series of interventions by several partners, etc.); \n Objectives: Describes the purpose of the evaluation, e.g., \u201cto analyse strategic program\u00ad matic and policy dimensions\u201d; \n Scope: Defines which issues, subjects and areas the evaluation will cover, and the period of the programme\u2019s life it will examine; \n Expected results: Defines what results the evaluation is expected to produce (e.g., findings, recommendations, lessons learned, rating on performance, an \u2018action item\u2019 list, etc.); \n Methodology or approach: Defines how data is collected and analysed for the evaluation; \n Evaluation team: Defines the composition of the staff involved and their areas of expertise; \n Management arrangements: Defines how the evaluation will be managed and organized, and how interactions with the DDR programme management will be structured.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66666,14 +66666,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.5. Planning evaluations", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "); \\n Methodology or approach: Defines how data is collected and analysed for the evaluation; \\n Evaluation team: Defines the composition of the staff involved and their areas of expertise; \\n Management arrangements: Defines how the evaluation will be managed and organized, and how interactions with the DDR programme management will be structured.", + "Sentence": "); \n Methodology or approach: Defines how data is collected and analysed for the evaluation; \n Evaluation team: Defines the composition of the staff involved and their areas of expertise; \n Management arrangements: Defines how the evaluation will be managed and organized, and how interactions with the DDR programme management will be structured.", "newParagraph": "complexity ddr specific skill needed depth comprehensive evaluation usually mean activity carried specialized contracted external actor partner external team brought essential draw precise term reference carrying evaluation clear overall objective coverage issue definedexpressed evaluation term reference document includes following section n introduction contains brief description rationale focus evaluation outcome programme project series intervention several partner etc n objective describes purpose evaluation eg analyse strategic program matic policy dimension n scope defines issue subject area evaluation cover period programme life examine n expected result defines result evaluation expected produce eg finding recommendation lesson learned rating performance action item list etc n methodology approach defines data collected analysed evaluation n evaluation team defines composition staff involved area expertise n management arrangement defines evaluation managed organized interaction ddr programme management structured", "ProcessedSent": " n methodology approach defines data collected analysed evaluation n evaluation team defines composition staff involved area expertise n management arrangement defines evaluation managed organized interaction ddr programme management structured", "SentID": 3703 }, { "ParagraphID": 1193, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n Evaluation is a management tool. It is a time\u00adbound activity that systematically and objectively assesses the relevance, performance and success of ongoing and completed programmes and projects. Evaluation is carried out selectively, asking and answering specific questions to guide decision makers and\/or programme managers. Evaluation determines the relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability of a programme or project. \\n Monitoring is a management tool. It is the systematic oversight of the implementation of an activity that establishes whether input deliveries, work schedules, other required actions and targeted outputs have proceeded according to plan, so that timely action can be taken to correct deficiencies.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n Evaluation is a management tool. It is a time\u00adbound activity that systematically and objectively assesses the relevance, performance and success of ongoing and completed programmes and projects. Evaluation is carried out selectively, asking and answering specific questions to guide decision makers and\/or programme managers. Evaluation determines the relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability of a programme or project. \n Monitoring is a management tool. It is the systematic oversight of the implementation of an activity that establishes whether input deliveries, work schedules, other required actions and targeted outputs have proceeded according to plan, so that timely action can be taken to correct deficiencies.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66684,14 +66684,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Terms and definitions \\n Evaluation is a management tool.", + "Sentence": "Terms and definitions \n Evaluation is a management tool.", "newParagraph": "term definition n evaluation management tool time bound activity systematically objectively ass relevance performance success ongoing completed programme project evaluation carried selectively asking answering specific question guide decision maker andor programme manager evaluation determines relevance efficiency effectiveness impact sustainability programme project n monitoring management tool systematic oversight implementation activity establishes whether input delivery work schedule required action targeted output proceeded according plan timely action taken correct deficiency", "ProcessedSent": "term definition n evaluation management tool", "SentID": 3704 }, { "ParagraphID": 1193, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n Evaluation is a management tool. It is a time\u00adbound activity that systematically and objectively assesses the relevance, performance and success of ongoing and completed programmes and projects. Evaluation is carried out selectively, asking and answering specific questions to guide decision makers and\/or programme managers. Evaluation determines the relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability of a programme or project. \\n Monitoring is a management tool. It is the systematic oversight of the implementation of an activity that establishes whether input deliveries, work schedules, other required actions and targeted outputs have proceeded according to plan, so that timely action can be taken to correct deficiencies.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n Evaluation is a management tool. It is a time\u00adbound activity that systematically and objectively assesses the relevance, performance and success of ongoing and completed programmes and projects. Evaluation is carried out selectively, asking and answering specific questions to guide decision makers and\/or programme managers. Evaluation determines the relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability of a programme or project. \n Monitoring is a management tool. It is the systematic oversight of the implementation of an activity that establishes whether input deliveries, work schedules, other required actions and targeted outputs have proceeded according to plan, so that timely action can be taken to correct deficiencies.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66709,7 +66709,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1193, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n Evaluation is a management tool. It is a time\u00adbound activity that systematically and objectively assesses the relevance, performance and success of ongoing and completed programmes and projects. Evaluation is carried out selectively, asking and answering specific questions to guide decision makers and\/or programme managers. Evaluation determines the relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability of a programme or project. \\n Monitoring is a management tool. It is the systematic oversight of the implementation of an activity that establishes whether input deliveries, work schedules, other required actions and targeted outputs have proceeded according to plan, so that timely action can be taken to correct deficiencies.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n Evaluation is a management tool. It is a time\u00adbound activity that systematically and objectively assesses the relevance, performance and success of ongoing and completed programmes and projects. Evaluation is carried out selectively, asking and answering specific questions to guide decision makers and\/or programme managers. Evaluation determines the relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability of a programme or project. \n Monitoring is a management tool. It is the systematic oversight of the implementation of an activity that establishes whether input deliveries, work schedules, other required actions and targeted outputs have proceeded according to plan, so that timely action can be taken to correct deficiencies.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66727,7 +66727,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1193, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n Evaluation is a management tool. It is a time\u00adbound activity that systematically and objectively assesses the relevance, performance and success of ongoing and completed programmes and projects. Evaluation is carried out selectively, asking and answering specific questions to guide decision makers and\/or programme managers. Evaluation determines the relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability of a programme or project. \\n Monitoring is a management tool. It is the systematic oversight of the implementation of an activity that establishes whether input deliveries, work schedules, other required actions and targeted outputs have proceeded according to plan, so that timely action can be taken to correct deficiencies.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n Evaluation is a management tool. It is a time\u00adbound activity that systematically and objectively assesses the relevance, performance and success of ongoing and completed programmes and projects. Evaluation is carried out selectively, asking and answering specific questions to guide decision makers and\/or programme managers. Evaluation determines the relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability of a programme or project. \n Monitoring is a management tool. It is the systematic oversight of the implementation of an activity that establishes whether input deliveries, work schedules, other required actions and targeted outputs have proceeded according to plan, so that timely action can be taken to correct deficiencies.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66745,7 +66745,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1193, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n Evaluation is a management tool. It is a time\u00adbound activity that systematically and objectively assesses the relevance, performance and success of ongoing and completed programmes and projects. Evaluation is carried out selectively, asking and answering specific questions to guide decision makers and\/or programme managers. Evaluation determines the relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability of a programme or project. \\n Monitoring is a management tool. It is the systematic oversight of the implementation of an activity that establishes whether input deliveries, work schedules, other required actions and targeted outputs have proceeded according to plan, so that timely action can be taken to correct deficiencies.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n Evaluation is a management tool. It is a time\u00adbound activity that systematically and objectively assesses the relevance, performance and success of ongoing and completed programmes and projects. Evaluation is carried out selectively, asking and answering specific questions to guide decision makers and\/or programme managers. Evaluation determines the relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability of a programme or project. \n Monitoring is a management tool. It is the systematic oversight of the implementation of an activity that establishes whether input deliveries, work schedules, other required actions and targeted outputs have proceeded according to plan, so that timely action can be taken to correct deficiencies.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66756,14 +66756,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Monitoring is a management tool.", + "Sentence": "\n Monitoring is a management tool.", "newParagraph": "term definition n evaluation management tool time bound activity systematically objectively ass relevance performance success ongoing completed programme project evaluation carried selectively asking answering specific question guide decision maker andor programme manager evaluation determines relevance efficiency effectiveness impact sustainability programme project n monitoring management tool systematic oversight implementation activity establishes whether input delivery work schedule required action targeted output proceeded according plan timely action taken correct deficiency", "ProcessedSent": "n monitoring management tool", "SentID": 3708 }, { "ParagraphID": 1193, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n Evaluation is a management tool. It is a time\u00adbound activity that systematically and objectively assesses the relevance, performance and success of ongoing and completed programmes and projects. Evaluation is carried out selectively, asking and answering specific questions to guide decision makers and\/or programme managers. Evaluation determines the relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability of a programme or project. \\n Monitoring is a management tool. It is the systematic oversight of the implementation of an activity that establishes whether input deliveries, work schedules, other required actions and targeted outputs have proceeded according to plan, so that timely action can be taken to correct deficiencies.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n Evaluation is a management tool. It is a time\u00adbound activity that systematically and objectively assesses the relevance, performance and success of ongoing and completed programmes and projects. Evaluation is carried out selectively, asking and answering specific questions to guide decision makers and\/or programme managers. Evaluation determines the relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability of a programme or project. \n Monitoring is a management tool. It is the systematic oversight of the implementation of an activity that establishes whether input deliveries, work schedules, other required actions and targeted outputs have proceeded according to plan, so that timely action can be taken to correct deficiencies.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66781,7 +66781,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1194, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 The term \u2018ex\u00adcombatants\u2019 in each indicator include supporters and those associated with armed forces and groups. Indicators for reintegration also include dependants. \\n 2 Total number of corps: 11. \\n 3 No. of XCs who started the reintegration package (excluding those who are in temporary wage labour and those who chose not to participate). \\n 4 Number of XCs who started but did not finish the reintegration package. \\n 5 Includes deputy commanders and chief of staff of corps and divisions.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 The term \u2018ex\u00adcombatants\u2019 in each indicator include supporters and those associated with armed forces and groups. Indicators for reintegration also include dependants. \n 2 Total number of corps: 11. \n 3 No. of XCs who started the reintegration package (excluding those who are in temporary wage labour and those who chose not to participate). \n 4 Number of XCs who started but did not finish the reintegration package. \n 5 Includes deputy commanders and chief of staff of corps and divisions.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66792,14 +66792,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 1 The term \u2018ex\u00adcombatants\u2019 in each indicator include supporters and those associated with armed forces and groups.", + "Sentence": "\n 1 The term \u2018ex\u00adcombatants\u2019 in each indicator include supporters and those associated with armed forces and groups.", "newParagraph": "n 1 term ex combatant indicator include supporter associated armed force group indicator reintegration also include dependant n 2 total number corp 11 n 3 xc started reintegration package excluding temporary wage labour chose participate n 4 number xc started finish reintegration package n 5 includes deputy commander chief staff corp division", "ProcessedSent": "n 1 term ex combatant indicator include supporter associated armed force group", "SentID": 3710 }, { "ParagraphID": 1194, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 The term \u2018ex\u00adcombatants\u2019 in each indicator include supporters and those associated with armed forces and groups. Indicators for reintegration also include dependants. \\n 2 Total number of corps: 11. \\n 3 No. of XCs who started the reintegration package (excluding those who are in temporary wage labour and those who chose not to participate). \\n 4 Number of XCs who started but did not finish the reintegration package. \\n 5 Includes deputy commanders and chief of staff of corps and divisions.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 The term \u2018ex\u00adcombatants\u2019 in each indicator include supporters and those associated with armed forces and groups. Indicators for reintegration also include dependants. \n 2 Total number of corps: 11. \n 3 No. of XCs who started the reintegration package (excluding those who are in temporary wage labour and those who chose not to participate). \n 4 Number of XCs who started but did not finish the reintegration package. \n 5 Includes deputy commanders and chief of staff of corps and divisions.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66817,7 +66817,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1194, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 The term \u2018ex\u00adcombatants\u2019 in each indicator include supporters and those associated with armed forces and groups. Indicators for reintegration also include dependants. \\n 2 Total number of corps: 11. \\n 3 No. of XCs who started the reintegration package (excluding those who are in temporary wage labour and those who chose not to participate). \\n 4 Number of XCs who started but did not finish the reintegration package. \\n 5 Includes deputy commanders and chief of staff of corps and divisions.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 The term \u2018ex\u00adcombatants\u2019 in each indicator include supporters and those associated with armed forces and groups. Indicators for reintegration also include dependants. \n 2 Total number of corps: 11. \n 3 No. of XCs who started the reintegration package (excluding those who are in temporary wage labour and those who chose not to participate). \n 4 Number of XCs who started but did not finish the reintegration package. \n 5 Includes deputy commanders and chief of staff of corps and divisions.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66828,14 +66828,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 2 Total number of corps: 11.", + "Sentence": "\n 2 Total number of corps: 11.", "newParagraph": "n 1 term ex combatant indicator include supporter associated armed force group indicator reintegration also include dependant n 2 total number corp 11 n 3 xc started reintegration package excluding temporary wage labour chose participate n 4 number xc started finish reintegration package n 5 includes deputy commander chief staff corp division", "ProcessedSent": "n 2 total number corp 11", "SentID": 3712 }, { "ParagraphID": 1194, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 The term \u2018ex\u00adcombatants\u2019 in each indicator include supporters and those associated with armed forces and groups. Indicators for reintegration also include dependants. \\n 2 Total number of corps: 11. \\n 3 No. of XCs who started the reintegration package (excluding those who are in temporary wage labour and those who chose not to participate). \\n 4 Number of XCs who started but did not finish the reintegration package. \\n 5 Includes deputy commanders and chief of staff of corps and divisions.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 The term \u2018ex\u00adcombatants\u2019 in each indicator include supporters and those associated with armed forces and groups. Indicators for reintegration also include dependants. \n 2 Total number of corps: 11. \n 3 No. of XCs who started the reintegration package (excluding those who are in temporary wage labour and those who chose not to participate). \n 4 Number of XCs who started but did not finish the reintegration package. \n 5 Includes deputy commanders and chief of staff of corps and divisions.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66846,14 +66846,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 3 No.", + "Sentence": "\n 3 No.", "newParagraph": "n 1 term ex combatant indicator include supporter associated armed force group indicator reintegration also include dependant n 2 total number corp 11 n 3 xc started reintegration package excluding temporary wage labour chose participate n 4 number xc started finish reintegration package n 5 includes deputy commander chief staff corp division", "ProcessedSent": "n 3", "SentID": 3713 }, { "ParagraphID": 1194, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 The term \u2018ex\u00adcombatants\u2019 in each indicator include supporters and those associated with armed forces and groups. Indicators for reintegration also include dependants. \\n 2 Total number of corps: 11. \\n 3 No. of XCs who started the reintegration package (excluding those who are in temporary wage labour and those who chose not to participate). \\n 4 Number of XCs who started but did not finish the reintegration package. \\n 5 Includes deputy commanders and chief of staff of corps and divisions.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 The term \u2018ex\u00adcombatants\u2019 in each indicator include supporters and those associated with armed forces and groups. Indicators for reintegration also include dependants. \n 2 Total number of corps: 11. \n 3 No. of XCs who started the reintegration package (excluding those who are in temporary wage labour and those who chose not to participate). \n 4 Number of XCs who started but did not finish the reintegration package. \n 5 Includes deputy commanders and chief of staff of corps and divisions.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66871,7 +66871,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1194, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 The term \u2018ex\u00adcombatants\u2019 in each indicator include supporters and those associated with armed forces and groups. Indicators for reintegration also include dependants. \\n 2 Total number of corps: 11. \\n 3 No. of XCs who started the reintegration package (excluding those who are in temporary wage labour and those who chose not to participate). \\n 4 Number of XCs who started but did not finish the reintegration package. \\n 5 Includes deputy commanders and chief of staff of corps and divisions.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 The term \u2018ex\u00adcombatants\u2019 in each indicator include supporters and those associated with armed forces and groups. Indicators for reintegration also include dependants. \n 2 Total number of corps: 11. \n 3 No. of XCs who started the reintegration package (excluding those who are in temporary wage labour and those who chose not to participate). \n 4 Number of XCs who started but did not finish the reintegration package. \n 5 Includes deputy commanders and chief of staff of corps and divisions.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66882,14 +66882,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 4 Number of XCs who started but did not finish the reintegration package.", + "Sentence": "\n 4 Number of XCs who started but did not finish the reintegration package.", "newParagraph": "n 1 term ex combatant indicator include supporter associated armed force group indicator reintegration also include dependant n 2 total number corp 11 n 3 xc started reintegration package excluding temporary wage labour chose participate n 4 number xc started finish reintegration package n 5 includes deputy commander chief staff corp division", "ProcessedSent": "n 4 number xc started finish reintegration package", "SentID": 3715 }, { "ParagraphID": 1194, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 The term \u2018ex\u00adcombatants\u2019 in each indicator include supporters and those associated with armed forces and groups. Indicators for reintegration also include dependants. \\n 2 Total number of corps: 11. \\n 3 No. of XCs who started the reintegration package (excluding those who are in temporary wage labour and those who chose not to participate). \\n 4 Number of XCs who started but did not finish the reintegration package. \\n 5 Includes deputy commanders and chief of staff of corps and divisions.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 The term \u2018ex\u00adcombatants\u2019 in each indicator include supporters and those associated with armed forces and groups. Indicators for reintegration also include dependants. \n 2 Total number of corps: 11. \n 3 No. of XCs who started the reintegration package (excluding those who are in temporary wage labour and those who chose not to participate). \n 4 Number of XCs who started but did not finish the reintegration package. \n 5 Includes deputy commanders and chief of staff of corps and divisions.", "Color": "#00A554", "Level": 3, "LevelName": "Structures and Processes", @@ -66900,7 +66900,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 5 Includes deputy commanders and chief of staff of corps and divisions.", + "Sentence": "\n 5 Includes deputy commanders and chief of staff of corps and divisions.", "newParagraph": "n 1 term ex combatant indicator include supporter associated armed force group indicator reintegration also include dependant n 2 total number corp 11 n 3 xc started reintegration package excluding temporary wage labour chose participate n 4 number xc started finish reintegration package n 5 includes deputy commander chief staff corp division", "ProcessedSent": "n 5 includes deputy commander chief staff corp division", "SentID": 3716 @@ -67303,7 +67303,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1203, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines. \\n a)\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b)\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c)\u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d)\u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \\n e)\u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines. \n a)\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b)\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c)\u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d)\u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \n e)\u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -67321,7 +67321,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1203, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines. \\n a)\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b)\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c)\u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d)\u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \\n e)\u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines. \n a)\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b)\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c)\u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d)\u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \n e)\u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -67339,7 +67339,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1203, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines. \\n a)\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b)\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c)\u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d)\u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \\n e)\u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines. \n a)\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b)\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c)\u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d)\u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \n e)\u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -67350,7 +67350,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n a)\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b)\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c)\u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d)\u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \\n e)\u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Sentence": "\n a)\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b)\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c)\u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d)\u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \n e)\u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may must used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "ProcessedSent": "n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "SentID": 3741 @@ -68167,7 +68167,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1225, - "Paragraph": "The disarmament component of a DDR programme will usually consist of four main phases: \\n (1) Operational planning; \\n (2) Weapons collection; \\n (3) Stockpile management; \\n (4) Disposal of collected materiel.", + "Paragraph": "The disarmament component of a DDR programme will usually consist of four main phases: \n (1) Operational planning; \n (2) Weapons collection; \n (3) Stockpile management; \n (4) Disposal of collected materiel.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -68178,7 +68178,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The disarmament component of a DDR programme will usually consist of four main phases: \\n (1) Operational planning; \\n (2) Weapons collection; \\n (3) Stockpile management; \\n (4) Disposal of collected materiel.", + "Sentence": "The disarmament component of a DDR programme will usually consist of four main phases: \n (1) Operational planning; \n (2) Weapons collection; \n (3) Stockpile management; \n (4) Disposal of collected materiel.", "newParagraph": "disarmament component ddr programme usually consist four main phase n 1 operational planning n 2 weapon collection n 3 stockpile management n 4 disposal collected materiel", "ProcessedSent": "disarmament component ddr programme usually consist four main phase n 1 operational planning n 2 weapon collection n 3 stockpile management n 4 disposal collected materiel", "SentID": 3787 @@ -69067,7 +69067,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1241, - "Paragraph": "Integrated assessments should include information related to the political and security context and the main drivers of armed conflict. In addition, in order to design evidence-based, age-specific and gender-sensitive disarmament operations, the integrated assessment should include: \\n An analysis of the memberships of armed forces and groups (number, origin, age, sex, etc.) and their arsenals (estimates of the number and the type of weapons, ammunition and explosives); \\n An analysis of the patterns of weapons possession among men, women, girls, boys, and youth; \\n A mapping of the locations and access routes to materiel and potential caches (to the extent possible); \\n An understanding of the power imbalances and disparities in weapons possession between communities; \\n An analysis of the use of weapons in the commission of serious human rights violations or abuses and grave breaches of international humanitarian law, as well as crime, including organized crime; \\n An understanding of cultural and gendered attitudes towards weapons and the value of arms and ammunition locally; \\n The identification of sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes; \\n Lessons learnt from any past disarmament or weapons collections initiatives; \\n An understanding of the willingness of and incentives for armed forces and groups to participate in DDR. \\n An assessment of the presence of armed groups not involved in DDR and the possible impact these groups can have on the DDR process.", + "Paragraph": "Integrated assessments should include information related to the political and security context and the main drivers of armed conflict. In addition, in order to design evidence-based, age-specific and gender-sensitive disarmament operations, the integrated assessment should include: \n An analysis of the memberships of armed forces and groups (number, origin, age, sex, etc.) and their arsenals (estimates of the number and the type of weapons, ammunition and explosives); \n An analysis of the patterns of weapons possession among men, women, girls, boys, and youth; \n A mapping of the locations and access routes to materiel and potential caches (to the extent possible); \n An understanding of the power imbalances and disparities in weapons possession between communities; \n An analysis of the use of weapons in the commission of serious human rights violations or abuses and grave breaches of international humanitarian law, as well as crime, including organized crime; \n An understanding of cultural and gendered attitudes towards weapons and the value of arms and ammunition locally; \n The identification of sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes; \n Lessons learnt from any past disarmament or weapons collections initiatives; \n An understanding of the willingness of and incentives for armed forces and groups to participate in DDR. \n An assessment of the presence of armed groups not involved in DDR and the possible impact these groups can have on the DDR process.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -69085,7 +69085,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1241, - "Paragraph": "Integrated assessments should include information related to the political and security context and the main drivers of armed conflict. In addition, in order to design evidence-based, age-specific and gender-sensitive disarmament operations, the integrated assessment should include: \\n An analysis of the memberships of armed forces and groups (number, origin, age, sex, etc.) and their arsenals (estimates of the number and the type of weapons, ammunition and explosives); \\n An analysis of the patterns of weapons possession among men, women, girls, boys, and youth; \\n A mapping of the locations and access routes to materiel and potential caches (to the extent possible); \\n An understanding of the power imbalances and disparities in weapons possession between communities; \\n An analysis of the use of weapons in the commission of serious human rights violations or abuses and grave breaches of international humanitarian law, as well as crime, including organized crime; \\n An understanding of cultural and gendered attitudes towards weapons and the value of arms and ammunition locally; \\n The identification of sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes; \\n Lessons learnt from any past disarmament or weapons collections initiatives; \\n An understanding of the willingness of and incentives for armed forces and groups to participate in DDR. \\n An assessment of the presence of armed groups not involved in DDR and the possible impact these groups can have on the DDR process.", + "Paragraph": "Integrated assessments should include information related to the political and security context and the main drivers of armed conflict. In addition, in order to design evidence-based, age-specific and gender-sensitive disarmament operations, the integrated assessment should include: \n An analysis of the memberships of armed forces and groups (number, origin, age, sex, etc.) and their arsenals (estimates of the number and the type of weapons, ammunition and explosives); \n An analysis of the patterns of weapons possession among men, women, girls, boys, and youth; \n A mapping of the locations and access routes to materiel and potential caches (to the extent possible); \n An understanding of the power imbalances and disparities in weapons possession between communities; \n An analysis of the use of weapons in the commission of serious human rights violations or abuses and grave breaches of international humanitarian law, as well as crime, including organized crime; \n An understanding of cultural and gendered attitudes towards weapons and the value of arms and ammunition locally; \n The identification of sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes; \n Lessons learnt from any past disarmament or weapons collections initiatives; \n An understanding of the willingness of and incentives for armed forces and groups to participate in DDR. \n An assessment of the presence of armed groups not involved in DDR and the possible impact these groups can have on the DDR process.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -69096,14 +69096,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Information collection", "Heading3": "5.1.1 Integrated assessment", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "In addition, in order to design evidence-based, age-specific and gender-sensitive disarmament operations, the integrated assessment should include: \\n An analysis of the memberships of armed forces and groups (number, origin, age, sex, etc.)", + "Sentence": "In addition, in order to design evidence-based, age-specific and gender-sensitive disarmament operations, the integrated assessment should include: \n An analysis of the memberships of armed forces and groups (number, origin, age, sex, etc.)", "newParagraph": "integrated assessment include information related political security context main driver armed conflict addition order design evidencebased agespecific gendersensitive disarmament operation integrated assessment include n analysis membership armed force group number origin age sex etc arsenal estimate number type weapon ammunition explosive n analysis pattern weapon possession among men woman girl boy youth n mapping location access route materiel potential cache extent possible n understanding power imbalance disparity weapon possession community n analysis use weapon commission serious human right violation abuse grave breach international humanitarian law well crime including organized crime n understanding cultural gendered attitude towards weapon value arm ammunition locally n identification source illicit weapon ammunition possible trafficking route n lesson learnt past disarmament weapon collection initiative n understanding willingness incentive armed force group participate ddr n assessment presence armed group involved ddr possible impact group ddr process", "ProcessedSent": "addition order design evidencebased agespecific gendersensitive disarmament operation integrated assessment include n analysis membership armed force group number origin age sex etc", "SentID": 3838 }, { "ParagraphID": 1241, - "Paragraph": "Integrated assessments should include information related to the political and security context and the main drivers of armed conflict. In addition, in order to design evidence-based, age-specific and gender-sensitive disarmament operations, the integrated assessment should include: \\n An analysis of the memberships of armed forces and groups (number, origin, age, sex, etc.) and their arsenals (estimates of the number and the type of weapons, ammunition and explosives); \\n An analysis of the patterns of weapons possession among men, women, girls, boys, and youth; \\n A mapping of the locations and access routes to materiel and potential caches (to the extent possible); \\n An understanding of the power imbalances and disparities in weapons possession between communities; \\n An analysis of the use of weapons in the commission of serious human rights violations or abuses and grave breaches of international humanitarian law, as well as crime, including organized crime; \\n An understanding of cultural and gendered attitudes towards weapons and the value of arms and ammunition locally; \\n The identification of sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes; \\n Lessons learnt from any past disarmament or weapons collections initiatives; \\n An understanding of the willingness of and incentives for armed forces and groups to participate in DDR. \\n An assessment of the presence of armed groups not involved in DDR and the possible impact these groups can have on the DDR process.", + "Paragraph": "Integrated assessments should include information related to the political and security context and the main drivers of armed conflict. In addition, in order to design evidence-based, age-specific and gender-sensitive disarmament operations, the integrated assessment should include: \n An analysis of the memberships of armed forces and groups (number, origin, age, sex, etc.) and their arsenals (estimates of the number and the type of weapons, ammunition and explosives); \n An analysis of the patterns of weapons possession among men, women, girls, boys, and youth; \n A mapping of the locations and access routes to materiel and potential caches (to the extent possible); \n An understanding of the power imbalances and disparities in weapons possession between communities; \n An analysis of the use of weapons in the commission of serious human rights violations or abuses and grave breaches of international humanitarian law, as well as crime, including organized crime; \n An understanding of cultural and gendered attitudes towards weapons and the value of arms and ammunition locally; \n The identification of sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes; \n Lessons learnt from any past disarmament or weapons collections initiatives; \n An understanding of the willingness of and incentives for armed forces and groups to participate in DDR. \n An assessment of the presence of armed groups not involved in DDR and the possible impact these groups can have on the DDR process.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -69114,14 +69114,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Information collection", "Heading3": "5.1.1 Integrated assessment", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "and their arsenals (estimates of the number and the type of weapons, ammunition and explosives); \\n An analysis of the patterns of weapons possession among men, women, girls, boys, and youth; \\n A mapping of the locations and access routes to materiel and potential caches (to the extent possible); \\n An understanding of the power imbalances and disparities in weapons possession between communities; \\n An analysis of the use of weapons in the commission of serious human rights violations or abuses and grave breaches of international humanitarian law, as well as crime, including organized crime; \\n An understanding of cultural and gendered attitudes towards weapons and the value of arms and ammunition locally; \\n The identification of sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes; \\n Lessons learnt from any past disarmament or weapons collections initiatives; \\n An understanding of the willingness of and incentives for armed forces and groups to participate in DDR.", + "Sentence": "and their arsenals (estimates of the number and the type of weapons, ammunition and explosives); \n An analysis of the patterns of weapons possession among men, women, girls, boys, and youth; \n A mapping of the locations and access routes to materiel and potential caches (to the extent possible); \n An understanding of the power imbalances and disparities in weapons possession between communities; \n An analysis of the use of weapons in the commission of serious human rights violations or abuses and grave breaches of international humanitarian law, as well as crime, including organized crime; \n An understanding of cultural and gendered attitudes towards weapons and the value of arms and ammunition locally; \n The identification of sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes; \n Lessons learnt from any past disarmament or weapons collections initiatives; \n An understanding of the willingness of and incentives for armed forces and groups to participate in DDR.", "newParagraph": "integrated assessment include information related political security context main driver armed conflict addition order design evidencebased agespecific gendersensitive disarmament operation integrated assessment include n analysis membership armed force group number origin age sex etc arsenal estimate number type weapon ammunition explosive n analysis pattern weapon possession among men woman girl boy youth n mapping location access route materiel potential cache extent possible n understanding power imbalance disparity weapon possession community n analysis use weapon commission serious human right violation abuse grave breach international humanitarian law well crime including organized crime n understanding cultural gendered attitude towards weapon value arm ammunition locally n identification source illicit weapon ammunition possible trafficking route n lesson learnt past disarmament weapon collection initiative n understanding willingness incentive armed force group participate ddr n assessment presence armed group involved ddr possible impact group ddr process", "ProcessedSent": "arsenal estimate number type weapon ammunition explosive n analysis pattern weapon possession among men woman girl boy youth n mapping location access route materiel potential cache extent possible n understanding power imbalance disparity weapon possession community n analysis use weapon commission serious human right violation abuse grave breach international humanitarian law well crime including organized crime n understanding cultural gendered attitude towards weapon value arm ammunition locally n identification source illicit weapon ammunition possible trafficking route n lesson learnt past disarmament weapon collection initiative n understanding willingness incentive armed force group participate ddr", "SentID": 3839 }, { "ParagraphID": 1241, - "Paragraph": "Integrated assessments should include information related to the political and security context and the main drivers of armed conflict. In addition, in order to design evidence-based, age-specific and gender-sensitive disarmament operations, the integrated assessment should include: \\n An analysis of the memberships of armed forces and groups (number, origin, age, sex, etc.) and their arsenals (estimates of the number and the type of weapons, ammunition and explosives); \\n An analysis of the patterns of weapons possession among men, women, girls, boys, and youth; \\n A mapping of the locations and access routes to materiel and potential caches (to the extent possible); \\n An understanding of the power imbalances and disparities in weapons possession between communities; \\n An analysis of the use of weapons in the commission of serious human rights violations or abuses and grave breaches of international humanitarian law, as well as crime, including organized crime; \\n An understanding of cultural and gendered attitudes towards weapons and the value of arms and ammunition locally; \\n The identification of sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes; \\n Lessons learnt from any past disarmament or weapons collections initiatives; \\n An understanding of the willingness of and incentives for armed forces and groups to participate in DDR. \\n An assessment of the presence of armed groups not involved in DDR and the possible impact these groups can have on the DDR process.", + "Paragraph": "Integrated assessments should include information related to the political and security context and the main drivers of armed conflict. In addition, in order to design evidence-based, age-specific and gender-sensitive disarmament operations, the integrated assessment should include: \n An analysis of the memberships of armed forces and groups (number, origin, age, sex, etc.) and their arsenals (estimates of the number and the type of weapons, ammunition and explosives); \n An analysis of the patterns of weapons possession among men, women, girls, boys, and youth; \n A mapping of the locations and access routes to materiel and potential caches (to the extent possible); \n An understanding of the power imbalances and disparities in weapons possession between communities; \n An analysis of the use of weapons in the commission of serious human rights violations or abuses and grave breaches of international humanitarian law, as well as crime, including organized crime; \n An understanding of cultural and gendered attitudes towards weapons and the value of arms and ammunition locally; \n The identification of sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes; \n Lessons learnt from any past disarmament or weapons collections initiatives; \n An understanding of the willingness of and incentives for armed forces and groups to participate in DDR. \n An assessment of the presence of armed groups not involved in DDR and the possible impact these groups can have on the DDR process.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -69132,7 +69132,7 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Information collection", "Heading3": "5.1.1 Integrated assessment", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n An assessment of the presence of armed groups not involved in DDR and the possible impact these groups can have on the DDR process.", + "Sentence": "\n An assessment of the presence of armed groups not involved in DDR and the possible impact these groups can have on the DDR process.", "newParagraph": "integrated assessment include information related political security context main driver armed conflict addition order design evidencebased agespecific gendersensitive disarmament operation integrated assessment include n analysis membership armed force group number origin age sex etc arsenal estimate number type weapon ammunition explosive n analysis pattern weapon possession among men woman girl boy youth n mapping location access route materiel potential cache extent possible n understanding power imbalance disparity weapon possession community n analysis use weapon commission serious human right violation abuse grave breach international humanitarian law well crime including organized crime n understanding cultural gendered attitude towards weapon value arm ammunition locally n identification source illicit weapon ammunition possible trafficking route n lesson learnt past disarmament weapon collection initiative n understanding willingness incentive armed force group participate ddr n assessment presence armed group involved ddr possible impact group ddr process", "ProcessedSent": "n assessment presence armed group involved ddr possible impact group ddr process", "SentID": 3840 @@ -69175,7 +69175,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1243, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: HOW TO COLLECT INFORMATION \\n Use information already available (previous UN reports, publications by specialized research centres, etc.). Research has often already been undertaken in conflict-affected States, particularly if a country has previously implemented a DDR programme. \\n Engage with national authorities. Talk to their experts and obtain available data (e.g., previous SALW survey data, DDR data, national registers of weapons, and records of thefts\/looting from storage facilities). \\n Ensure that all data collected on individuals is sex and age disaggregated. \\n If ceasefires have been implemented, warring parties may have provided a declaration of forces for the purpose of monitoring the ceasefire. Such declarations typically include information related to the disengagement and movement of troops and weapons. \\n Obtain data from seizures of weapons or discoveries of caches that provide insight into which armed forces and groups possess which materiel, as well as its origins and the context in which the seizures take place. \\n If the DDR programme is to be implemented with the support of a UN peace operation, organize regular meetings to compare observations and information with other UN agencies collecting data on security issues and armed forces and groups, as well as with other relevant international organizations and diplomatic representations. \\n Develop a network of key informants, including by meeting with ex-combatants and with male and female representatives and members of armed forces and groups. This should be done in line with the policy of the UN mission on engaging with armed forces and groups, if any, and in line with the UN\u2019s guidance on the modalities of engagement with armed forces and groups (see Annex B). \\n Meet with community leaders, women\u2019s organizations, youth groups, human rights organizations and other civil society groups. \\n Search for information and images on social media (e.g., monitor Facebook pages of armed groups and national defence forces).", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: HOW TO COLLECT INFORMATION \n Use information already available (previous UN reports, publications by specialized research centres, etc.). Research has often already been undertaken in conflict-affected States, particularly if a country has previously implemented a DDR programme. \n Engage with national authorities. Talk to their experts and obtain available data (e.g., previous SALW survey data, DDR data, national registers of weapons, and records of thefts\/looting from storage facilities). \n Ensure that all data collected on individuals is sex and age disaggregated. \n If ceasefires have been implemented, warring parties may have provided a declaration of forces for the purpose of monitoring the ceasefire. Such declarations typically include information related to the disengagement and movement of troops and weapons. \n Obtain data from seizures of weapons or discoveries of caches that provide insight into which armed forces and groups possess which materiel, as well as its origins and the context in which the seizures take place. \n If the DDR programme is to be implemented with the support of a UN peace operation, organize regular meetings to compare observations and information with other UN agencies collecting data on security issues and armed forces and groups, as well as with other relevant international organizations and diplomatic representations. \n Develop a network of key informants, including by meeting with ex-combatants and with male and female representatives and members of armed forces and groups. This should be done in line with the policy of the UN mission on engaging with armed forces and groups, if any, and in line with the UN\u2019s guidance on the modalities of engagement with armed forces and groups (see Annex B). \n Meet with community leaders, women\u2019s organizations, youth groups, human rights organizations and other civil society groups. \n Search for information and images on social media (e.g., monitor Facebook pages of armed groups and national defence forces).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -69186,14 +69186,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Information collection", "Heading3": "5.1.1 Integrated assessment", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "BOX 1: HOW TO COLLECT INFORMATION \\n Use information already available (previous UN reports, publications by specialized research centres, etc.).", + "Sentence": "BOX 1: HOW TO COLLECT INFORMATION \n Use information already available (previous UN reports, publications by specialized research centres, etc.).", "newParagraph": "box 1 collect information n use information already available previous un report publication specialized research centre etc research often already undertaken conflictaffected state particularly country previously implemented ddr programme n engage national authority talk expert obtain available data eg previous salw survey data ddr data national register weapon record theftslooting storage facility n ensure data collected individual sex age disaggregated n ceasefires implemented warring party may provided declaration force purpose monitoring ceasefire declaration typically include information related disengagement movement troop weapon n obtain data seizure weapon discovery cache provide insight armed force group posse materiel well origin context seizure take place n ddr programme implemented support un peace operation organize regular meeting compare observation information un agency collecting data security issue armed force group well relevant international organization diplomatic representation n develop network key informant including meeting excombatants male female representative member armed force group done line policy un mission engaging armed force group line un guidance modality engagement armed force group see annex b n meet community leader woman organization youth group human right organization civil society group n search information image social medium eg monitor facebook page armed group national defence force", "ProcessedSent": "box 1 collect information n use information already available previous un report publication specialized research centre etc", "SentID": 3843 }, { "ParagraphID": 1243, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: HOW TO COLLECT INFORMATION \\n Use information already available (previous UN reports, publications by specialized research centres, etc.). Research has often already been undertaken in conflict-affected States, particularly if a country has previously implemented a DDR programme. \\n Engage with national authorities. Talk to their experts and obtain available data (e.g., previous SALW survey data, DDR data, national registers of weapons, and records of thefts\/looting from storage facilities). \\n Ensure that all data collected on individuals is sex and age disaggregated. \\n If ceasefires have been implemented, warring parties may have provided a declaration of forces for the purpose of monitoring the ceasefire. Such declarations typically include information related to the disengagement and movement of troops and weapons. \\n Obtain data from seizures of weapons or discoveries of caches that provide insight into which armed forces and groups possess which materiel, as well as its origins and the context in which the seizures take place. \\n If the DDR programme is to be implemented with the support of a UN peace operation, organize regular meetings to compare observations and information with other UN agencies collecting data on security issues and armed forces and groups, as well as with other relevant international organizations and diplomatic representations. \\n Develop a network of key informants, including by meeting with ex-combatants and with male and female representatives and members of armed forces and groups. This should be done in line with the policy of the UN mission on engaging with armed forces and groups, if any, and in line with the UN\u2019s guidance on the modalities of engagement with armed forces and groups (see Annex B). \\n Meet with community leaders, women\u2019s organizations, youth groups, human rights organizations and other civil society groups. \\n Search for information and images on social media (e.g., monitor Facebook pages of armed groups and national defence forces).", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: HOW TO COLLECT INFORMATION \n Use information already available (previous UN reports, publications by specialized research centres, etc.). Research has often already been undertaken in conflict-affected States, particularly if a country has previously implemented a DDR programme. \n Engage with national authorities. Talk to their experts and obtain available data (e.g., previous SALW survey data, DDR data, national registers of weapons, and records of thefts\/looting from storage facilities). \n Ensure that all data collected on individuals is sex and age disaggregated. \n If ceasefires have been implemented, warring parties may have provided a declaration of forces for the purpose of monitoring the ceasefire. Such declarations typically include information related to the disengagement and movement of troops and weapons. \n Obtain data from seizures of weapons or discoveries of caches that provide insight into which armed forces and groups possess which materiel, as well as its origins and the context in which the seizures take place. \n If the DDR programme is to be implemented with the support of a UN peace operation, organize regular meetings to compare observations and information with other UN agencies collecting data on security issues and armed forces and groups, as well as with other relevant international organizations and diplomatic representations. \n Develop a network of key informants, including by meeting with ex-combatants and with male and female representatives and members of armed forces and groups. This should be done in line with the policy of the UN mission on engaging with armed forces and groups, if any, and in line with the UN\u2019s guidance on the modalities of engagement with armed forces and groups (see Annex B). \n Meet with community leaders, women\u2019s organizations, youth groups, human rights organizations and other civil society groups. \n Search for information and images on social media (e.g., monitor Facebook pages of armed groups and national defence forces).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -69211,7 +69211,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1243, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: HOW TO COLLECT INFORMATION \\n Use information already available (previous UN reports, publications by specialized research centres, etc.). Research has often already been undertaken in conflict-affected States, particularly if a country has previously implemented a DDR programme. \\n Engage with national authorities. Talk to their experts and obtain available data (e.g., previous SALW survey data, DDR data, national registers of weapons, and records of thefts\/looting from storage facilities). \\n Ensure that all data collected on individuals is sex and age disaggregated. \\n If ceasefires have been implemented, warring parties may have provided a declaration of forces for the purpose of monitoring the ceasefire. Such declarations typically include information related to the disengagement and movement of troops and weapons. \\n Obtain data from seizures of weapons or discoveries of caches that provide insight into which armed forces and groups possess which materiel, as well as its origins and the context in which the seizures take place. \\n If the DDR programme is to be implemented with the support of a UN peace operation, organize regular meetings to compare observations and information with other UN agencies collecting data on security issues and armed forces and groups, as well as with other relevant international organizations and diplomatic representations. \\n Develop a network of key informants, including by meeting with ex-combatants and with male and female representatives and members of armed forces and groups. This should be done in line with the policy of the UN mission on engaging with armed forces and groups, if any, and in line with the UN\u2019s guidance on the modalities of engagement with armed forces and groups (see Annex B). \\n Meet with community leaders, women\u2019s organizations, youth groups, human rights organizations and other civil society groups. \\n Search for information and images on social media (e.g., monitor Facebook pages of armed groups and national defence forces).", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: HOW TO COLLECT INFORMATION \n Use information already available (previous UN reports, publications by specialized research centres, etc.). Research has often already been undertaken in conflict-affected States, particularly if a country has previously implemented a DDR programme. \n Engage with national authorities. Talk to their experts and obtain available data (e.g., previous SALW survey data, DDR data, national registers of weapons, and records of thefts\/looting from storage facilities). \n Ensure that all data collected on individuals is sex and age disaggregated. \n If ceasefires have been implemented, warring parties may have provided a declaration of forces for the purpose of monitoring the ceasefire. Such declarations typically include information related to the disengagement and movement of troops and weapons. \n Obtain data from seizures of weapons or discoveries of caches that provide insight into which armed forces and groups possess which materiel, as well as its origins and the context in which the seizures take place. \n If the DDR programme is to be implemented with the support of a UN peace operation, organize regular meetings to compare observations and information with other UN agencies collecting data on security issues and armed forces and groups, as well as with other relevant international organizations and diplomatic representations. \n Develop a network of key informants, including by meeting with ex-combatants and with male and female representatives and members of armed forces and groups. This should be done in line with the policy of the UN mission on engaging with armed forces and groups, if any, and in line with the UN\u2019s guidance on the modalities of engagement with armed forces and groups (see Annex B). \n Meet with community leaders, women\u2019s organizations, youth groups, human rights organizations and other civil society groups. \n Search for information and images on social media (e.g., monitor Facebook pages of armed groups and national defence forces).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -69222,14 +69222,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Information collection", "Heading3": "5.1.1 Integrated assessment", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Engage with national authorities.", + "Sentence": "\n Engage with national authorities.", "newParagraph": "box 1 collect information n use information already available previous un report publication specialized research centre etc research often already undertaken conflictaffected state particularly country previously implemented ddr programme n engage national authority talk expert obtain available data eg previous salw survey data ddr data national register weapon record theftslooting storage facility n ensure data collected individual sex age disaggregated n ceasefires implemented warring party may provided declaration force purpose monitoring ceasefire declaration typically include information related disengagement movement troop weapon n obtain data seizure weapon discovery cache provide insight armed force group posse materiel well origin context seizure take place n ddr programme implemented support un peace operation organize regular meeting compare observation information un agency collecting data security issue armed force group well relevant international organization diplomatic representation n develop network key informant including meeting excombatants male female representative member armed force group done line policy un mission engaging armed force group line un guidance modality engagement armed force group see annex b n meet community leader woman organization youth group human right organization civil society group n search information image social medium eg monitor facebook page armed group national defence force", "ProcessedSent": "n engage national authority", "SentID": 3845 }, { "ParagraphID": 1243, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: HOW TO COLLECT INFORMATION \\n Use information already available (previous UN reports, publications by specialized research centres, etc.). Research has often already been undertaken in conflict-affected States, particularly if a country has previously implemented a DDR programme. \\n Engage with national authorities. Talk to their experts and obtain available data (e.g., previous SALW survey data, DDR data, national registers of weapons, and records of thefts\/looting from storage facilities). \\n Ensure that all data collected on individuals is sex and age disaggregated. \\n If ceasefires have been implemented, warring parties may have provided a declaration of forces for the purpose of monitoring the ceasefire. Such declarations typically include information related to the disengagement and movement of troops and weapons. \\n Obtain data from seizures of weapons or discoveries of caches that provide insight into which armed forces and groups possess which materiel, as well as its origins and the context in which the seizures take place. \\n If the DDR programme is to be implemented with the support of a UN peace operation, organize regular meetings to compare observations and information with other UN agencies collecting data on security issues and armed forces and groups, as well as with other relevant international organizations and diplomatic representations. \\n Develop a network of key informants, including by meeting with ex-combatants and with male and female representatives and members of armed forces and groups. This should be done in line with the policy of the UN mission on engaging with armed forces and groups, if any, and in line with the UN\u2019s guidance on the modalities of engagement with armed forces and groups (see Annex B). \\n Meet with community leaders, women\u2019s organizations, youth groups, human rights organizations and other civil society groups. \\n Search for information and images on social media (e.g., monitor Facebook pages of armed groups and national defence forces).", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: HOW TO COLLECT INFORMATION \n Use information already available (previous UN reports, publications by specialized research centres, etc.). Research has often already been undertaken in conflict-affected States, particularly if a country has previously implemented a DDR programme. \n Engage with national authorities. Talk to their experts and obtain available data (e.g., previous SALW survey data, DDR data, national registers of weapons, and records of thefts\/looting from storage facilities). \n Ensure that all data collected on individuals is sex and age disaggregated. \n If ceasefires have been implemented, warring parties may have provided a declaration of forces for the purpose of monitoring the ceasefire. Such declarations typically include information related to the disengagement and movement of troops and weapons. \n Obtain data from seizures of weapons or discoveries of caches that provide insight into which armed forces and groups possess which materiel, as well as its origins and the context in which the seizures take place. \n If the DDR programme is to be implemented with the support of a UN peace operation, organize regular meetings to compare observations and information with other UN agencies collecting data on security issues and armed forces and groups, as well as with other relevant international organizations and diplomatic representations. \n Develop a network of key informants, including by meeting with ex-combatants and with male and female representatives and members of armed forces and groups. This should be done in line with the policy of the UN mission on engaging with armed forces and groups, if any, and in line with the UN\u2019s guidance on the modalities of engagement with armed forces and groups (see Annex B). \n Meet with community leaders, women\u2019s organizations, youth groups, human rights organizations and other civil society groups. \n Search for information and images on social media (e.g., monitor Facebook pages of armed groups and national defence forces).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -69247,7 +69247,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1243, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: HOW TO COLLECT INFORMATION \\n Use information already available (previous UN reports, publications by specialized research centres, etc.). Research has often already been undertaken in conflict-affected States, particularly if a country has previously implemented a DDR programme. \\n Engage with national authorities. Talk to their experts and obtain available data (e.g., previous SALW survey data, DDR data, national registers of weapons, and records of thefts\/looting from storage facilities). \\n Ensure that all data collected on individuals is sex and age disaggregated. \\n If ceasefires have been implemented, warring parties may have provided a declaration of forces for the purpose of monitoring the ceasefire. Such declarations typically include information related to the disengagement and movement of troops and weapons. \\n Obtain data from seizures of weapons or discoveries of caches that provide insight into which armed forces and groups possess which materiel, as well as its origins and the context in which the seizures take place. \\n If the DDR programme is to be implemented with the support of a UN peace operation, organize regular meetings to compare observations and information with other UN agencies collecting data on security issues and armed forces and groups, as well as with other relevant international organizations and diplomatic representations. \\n Develop a network of key informants, including by meeting with ex-combatants and with male and female representatives and members of armed forces and groups. This should be done in line with the policy of the UN mission on engaging with armed forces and groups, if any, and in line with the UN\u2019s guidance on the modalities of engagement with armed forces and groups (see Annex B). \\n Meet with community leaders, women\u2019s organizations, youth groups, human rights organizations and other civil society groups. \\n Search for information and images on social media (e.g., monitor Facebook pages of armed groups and national defence forces).", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: HOW TO COLLECT INFORMATION \n Use information already available (previous UN reports, publications by specialized research centres, etc.). Research has often already been undertaken in conflict-affected States, particularly if a country has previously implemented a DDR programme. \n Engage with national authorities. Talk to their experts and obtain available data (e.g., previous SALW survey data, DDR data, national registers of weapons, and records of thefts\/looting from storage facilities). \n Ensure that all data collected on individuals is sex and age disaggregated. \n If ceasefires have been implemented, warring parties may have provided a declaration of forces for the purpose of monitoring the ceasefire. Such declarations typically include information related to the disengagement and movement of troops and weapons. \n Obtain data from seizures of weapons or discoveries of caches that provide insight into which armed forces and groups possess which materiel, as well as its origins and the context in which the seizures take place. \n If the DDR programme is to be implemented with the support of a UN peace operation, organize regular meetings to compare observations and information with other UN agencies collecting data on security issues and armed forces and groups, as well as with other relevant international organizations and diplomatic representations. \n Develop a network of key informants, including by meeting with ex-combatants and with male and female representatives and members of armed forces and groups. This should be done in line with the policy of the UN mission on engaging with armed forces and groups, if any, and in line with the UN\u2019s guidance on the modalities of engagement with armed forces and groups (see Annex B). \n Meet with community leaders, women\u2019s organizations, youth groups, human rights organizations and other civil society groups. \n Search for information and images on social media (e.g., monitor Facebook pages of armed groups and national defence forces).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -69258,14 +69258,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Information collection", "Heading3": "5.1.1 Integrated assessment", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Ensure that all data collected on individuals is sex and age disaggregated.", + "Sentence": "\n Ensure that all data collected on individuals is sex and age disaggregated.", "newParagraph": "box 1 collect information n use information already available previous un report publication specialized research centre etc research often already undertaken conflictaffected state particularly country previously implemented ddr programme n engage national authority talk expert obtain available data eg previous salw survey data ddr data national register weapon record theftslooting storage facility n ensure data collected individual sex age disaggregated n ceasefires implemented warring party may provided declaration force purpose monitoring ceasefire declaration typically include information related disengagement movement troop weapon n obtain data seizure weapon discovery cache provide insight armed force group posse materiel well origin context seizure take place n ddr programme implemented support un peace operation organize regular meeting compare observation information un agency collecting data security issue armed force group well relevant international organization diplomatic representation n develop network key informant including meeting excombatants male female representative member armed force group done line policy un mission engaging armed force group line un guidance modality engagement armed force group see annex b n meet community leader woman organization youth group human right organization civil society group n search information image social medium eg monitor facebook page armed group national defence force", "ProcessedSent": "n ensure data collected individual sex age disaggregated", "SentID": 3847 }, { "ParagraphID": 1243, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: HOW TO COLLECT INFORMATION \\n Use information already available (previous UN reports, publications by specialized research centres, etc.). Research has often already been undertaken in conflict-affected States, particularly if a country has previously implemented a DDR programme. \\n Engage with national authorities. Talk to their experts and obtain available data (e.g., previous SALW survey data, DDR data, national registers of weapons, and records of thefts\/looting from storage facilities). \\n Ensure that all data collected on individuals is sex and age disaggregated. \\n If ceasefires have been implemented, warring parties may have provided a declaration of forces for the purpose of monitoring the ceasefire. Such declarations typically include information related to the disengagement and movement of troops and weapons. \\n Obtain data from seizures of weapons or discoveries of caches that provide insight into which armed forces and groups possess which materiel, as well as its origins and the context in which the seizures take place. \\n If the DDR programme is to be implemented with the support of a UN peace operation, organize regular meetings to compare observations and information with other UN agencies collecting data on security issues and armed forces and groups, as well as with other relevant international organizations and diplomatic representations. \\n Develop a network of key informants, including by meeting with ex-combatants and with male and female representatives and members of armed forces and groups. This should be done in line with the policy of the UN mission on engaging with armed forces and groups, if any, and in line with the UN\u2019s guidance on the modalities of engagement with armed forces and groups (see Annex B). \\n Meet with community leaders, women\u2019s organizations, youth groups, human rights organizations and other civil society groups. \\n Search for information and images on social media (e.g., monitor Facebook pages of armed groups and national defence forces).", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: HOW TO COLLECT INFORMATION \n Use information already available (previous UN reports, publications by specialized research centres, etc.). Research has often already been undertaken in conflict-affected States, particularly if a country has previously implemented a DDR programme. \n Engage with national authorities. Talk to their experts and obtain available data (e.g., previous SALW survey data, DDR data, national registers of weapons, and records of thefts\/looting from storage facilities). \n Ensure that all data collected on individuals is sex and age disaggregated. \n If ceasefires have been implemented, warring parties may have provided a declaration of forces for the purpose of monitoring the ceasefire. Such declarations typically include information related to the disengagement and movement of troops and weapons. \n Obtain data from seizures of weapons or discoveries of caches that provide insight into which armed forces and groups possess which materiel, as well as its origins and the context in which the seizures take place. \n If the DDR programme is to be implemented with the support of a UN peace operation, organize regular meetings to compare observations and information with other UN agencies collecting data on security issues and armed forces and groups, as well as with other relevant international organizations and diplomatic representations. \n Develop a network of key informants, including by meeting with ex-combatants and with male and female representatives and members of armed forces and groups. This should be done in line with the policy of the UN mission on engaging with armed forces and groups, if any, and in line with the UN\u2019s guidance on the modalities of engagement with armed forces and groups (see Annex B). \n Meet with community leaders, women\u2019s organizations, youth groups, human rights organizations and other civil society groups. \n Search for information and images on social media (e.g., monitor Facebook pages of armed groups and national defence forces).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -69276,14 +69276,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Information collection", "Heading3": "5.1.1 Integrated assessment", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n If ceasefires have been implemented, warring parties may have provided a declaration of forces for the purpose of monitoring the ceasefire.", + "Sentence": "\n If ceasefires have been implemented, warring parties may have provided a declaration of forces for the purpose of monitoring the ceasefire.", "newParagraph": "box 1 collect information n use information already available previous un report publication specialized research centre etc research often already undertaken conflictaffected state particularly country previously implemented ddr programme n engage national authority talk expert obtain available data eg previous salw survey data ddr data national register weapon record theftslooting storage facility n ensure data collected individual sex age disaggregated n ceasefires implemented warring party may provided declaration force purpose monitoring ceasefire declaration typically include information related disengagement movement troop weapon n obtain data seizure weapon discovery cache provide insight armed force group posse materiel well origin context seizure take place n ddr programme implemented support un peace operation organize regular meeting compare observation information un agency collecting data security issue armed force group well relevant international organization diplomatic representation n develop network key informant including meeting excombatants male female representative member armed force group done line policy un mission engaging armed force group line un guidance modality engagement armed force group see annex b n meet community leader woman organization youth group human right organization civil society group n search information image social medium eg monitor facebook page armed group national defence force", "ProcessedSent": "n ceasefires implemented warring party may provided declaration force purpose monitoring ceasefire", "SentID": 3848 }, { "ParagraphID": 1243, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: HOW TO COLLECT INFORMATION \\n Use information already available (previous UN reports, publications by specialized research centres, etc.). Research has often already been undertaken in conflict-affected States, particularly if a country has previously implemented a DDR programme. \\n Engage with national authorities. Talk to their experts and obtain available data (e.g., previous SALW survey data, DDR data, national registers of weapons, and records of thefts\/looting from storage facilities). \\n Ensure that all data collected on individuals is sex and age disaggregated. \\n If ceasefires have been implemented, warring parties may have provided a declaration of forces for the purpose of monitoring the ceasefire. Such declarations typically include information related to the disengagement and movement of troops and weapons. \\n Obtain data from seizures of weapons or discoveries of caches that provide insight into which armed forces and groups possess which materiel, as well as its origins and the context in which the seizures take place. \\n If the DDR programme is to be implemented with the support of a UN peace operation, organize regular meetings to compare observations and information with other UN agencies collecting data on security issues and armed forces and groups, as well as with other relevant international organizations and diplomatic representations. \\n Develop a network of key informants, including by meeting with ex-combatants and with male and female representatives and members of armed forces and groups. This should be done in line with the policy of the UN mission on engaging with armed forces and groups, if any, and in line with the UN\u2019s guidance on the modalities of engagement with armed forces and groups (see Annex B). \\n Meet with community leaders, women\u2019s organizations, youth groups, human rights organizations and other civil society groups. \\n Search for information and images on social media (e.g., monitor Facebook pages of armed groups and national defence forces).", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: HOW TO COLLECT INFORMATION \n Use information already available (previous UN reports, publications by specialized research centres, etc.). Research has often already been undertaken in conflict-affected States, particularly if a country has previously implemented a DDR programme. \n Engage with national authorities. Talk to their experts and obtain available data (e.g., previous SALW survey data, DDR data, national registers of weapons, and records of thefts\/looting from storage facilities). \n Ensure that all data collected on individuals is sex and age disaggregated. \n If ceasefires have been implemented, warring parties may have provided a declaration of forces for the purpose of monitoring the ceasefire. Such declarations typically include information related to the disengagement and movement of troops and weapons. \n Obtain data from seizures of weapons or discoveries of caches that provide insight into which armed forces and groups possess which materiel, as well as its origins and the context in which the seizures take place. \n If the DDR programme is to be implemented with the support of a UN peace operation, organize regular meetings to compare observations and information with other UN agencies collecting data on security issues and armed forces and groups, as well as with other relevant international organizations and diplomatic representations. \n Develop a network of key informants, including by meeting with ex-combatants and with male and female representatives and members of armed forces and groups. This should be done in line with the policy of the UN mission on engaging with armed forces and groups, if any, and in line with the UN\u2019s guidance on the modalities of engagement with armed forces and groups (see Annex B). \n Meet with community leaders, women\u2019s organizations, youth groups, human rights organizations and other civil society groups. \n Search for information and images on social media (e.g., monitor Facebook pages of armed groups and national defence forces).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -69301,7 +69301,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1243, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: HOW TO COLLECT INFORMATION \\n Use information already available (previous UN reports, publications by specialized research centres, etc.). Research has often already been undertaken in conflict-affected States, particularly if a country has previously implemented a DDR programme. \\n Engage with national authorities. Talk to their experts and obtain available data (e.g., previous SALW survey data, DDR data, national registers of weapons, and records of thefts\/looting from storage facilities). \\n Ensure that all data collected on individuals is sex and age disaggregated. \\n If ceasefires have been implemented, warring parties may have provided a declaration of forces for the purpose of monitoring the ceasefire. Such declarations typically include information related to the disengagement and movement of troops and weapons. \\n Obtain data from seizures of weapons or discoveries of caches that provide insight into which armed forces and groups possess which materiel, as well as its origins and the context in which the seizures take place. \\n If the DDR programme is to be implemented with the support of a UN peace operation, organize regular meetings to compare observations and information with other UN agencies collecting data on security issues and armed forces and groups, as well as with other relevant international organizations and diplomatic representations. \\n Develop a network of key informants, including by meeting with ex-combatants and with male and female representatives and members of armed forces and groups. This should be done in line with the policy of the UN mission on engaging with armed forces and groups, if any, and in line with the UN\u2019s guidance on the modalities of engagement with armed forces and groups (see Annex B). \\n Meet with community leaders, women\u2019s organizations, youth groups, human rights organizations and other civil society groups. \\n Search for information and images on social media (e.g., monitor Facebook pages of armed groups and national defence forces).", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: HOW TO COLLECT INFORMATION \n Use information already available (previous UN reports, publications by specialized research centres, etc.). Research has often already been undertaken in conflict-affected States, particularly if a country has previously implemented a DDR programme. \n Engage with national authorities. Talk to their experts and obtain available data (e.g., previous SALW survey data, DDR data, national registers of weapons, and records of thefts\/looting from storage facilities). \n Ensure that all data collected on individuals is sex and age disaggregated. \n If ceasefires have been implemented, warring parties may have provided a declaration of forces for the purpose of monitoring the ceasefire. Such declarations typically include information related to the disengagement and movement of troops and weapons. \n Obtain data from seizures of weapons or discoveries of caches that provide insight into which armed forces and groups possess which materiel, as well as its origins and the context in which the seizures take place. \n If the DDR programme is to be implemented with the support of a UN peace operation, organize regular meetings to compare observations and information with other UN agencies collecting data on security issues and armed forces and groups, as well as with other relevant international organizations and diplomatic representations. \n Develop a network of key informants, including by meeting with ex-combatants and with male and female representatives and members of armed forces and groups. This should be done in line with the policy of the UN mission on engaging with armed forces and groups, if any, and in line with the UN\u2019s guidance on the modalities of engagement with armed forces and groups (see Annex B). \n Meet with community leaders, women\u2019s organizations, youth groups, human rights organizations and other civil society groups. \n Search for information and images on social media (e.g., monitor Facebook pages of armed groups and national defence forces).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -69312,14 +69312,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Information collection", "Heading3": "5.1.1 Integrated assessment", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Obtain data from seizures of weapons or discoveries of caches that provide insight into which armed forces and groups possess which materiel, as well as its origins and the context in which the seizures take place.", + "Sentence": "\n Obtain data from seizures of weapons or discoveries of caches that provide insight into which armed forces and groups possess which materiel, as well as its origins and the context in which the seizures take place.", "newParagraph": "box 1 collect information n use information already available previous un report publication specialized research centre etc research often already undertaken conflictaffected state particularly country previously implemented ddr programme n engage national authority talk expert obtain available data eg previous salw survey data ddr data national register weapon record theftslooting storage facility n ensure data collected individual sex age disaggregated n ceasefires implemented warring party may provided declaration force purpose monitoring ceasefire declaration typically include information related disengagement movement troop weapon n obtain data seizure weapon discovery cache provide insight armed force group posse materiel well origin context seizure take place n ddr programme implemented support un peace operation organize regular meeting compare observation information un agency collecting data security issue armed force group well relevant international organization diplomatic representation n develop network key informant including meeting excombatants male female representative member armed force group done line policy un mission engaging armed force group line un guidance modality engagement armed force group see annex b n meet community leader woman organization youth group human right organization civil society group n search information image social medium eg monitor facebook page armed group national defence force", "ProcessedSent": "n obtain data seizure weapon discovery cache provide insight armed force group posse materiel well origin context seizure take place", "SentID": 3850 }, { "ParagraphID": 1243, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: HOW TO COLLECT INFORMATION \\n Use information already available (previous UN reports, publications by specialized research centres, etc.). Research has often already been undertaken in conflict-affected States, particularly if a country has previously implemented a DDR programme. \\n Engage with national authorities. Talk to their experts and obtain available data (e.g., previous SALW survey data, DDR data, national registers of weapons, and records of thefts\/looting from storage facilities). \\n Ensure that all data collected on individuals is sex and age disaggregated. \\n If ceasefires have been implemented, warring parties may have provided a declaration of forces for the purpose of monitoring the ceasefire. Such declarations typically include information related to the disengagement and movement of troops and weapons. \\n Obtain data from seizures of weapons or discoveries of caches that provide insight into which armed forces and groups possess which materiel, as well as its origins and the context in which the seizures take place. \\n If the DDR programme is to be implemented with the support of a UN peace operation, organize regular meetings to compare observations and information with other UN agencies collecting data on security issues and armed forces and groups, as well as with other relevant international organizations and diplomatic representations. \\n Develop a network of key informants, including by meeting with ex-combatants and with male and female representatives and members of armed forces and groups. This should be done in line with the policy of the UN mission on engaging with armed forces and groups, if any, and in line with the UN\u2019s guidance on the modalities of engagement with armed forces and groups (see Annex B). \\n Meet with community leaders, women\u2019s organizations, youth groups, human rights organizations and other civil society groups. \\n Search for information and images on social media (e.g., monitor Facebook pages of armed groups and national defence forces).", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: HOW TO COLLECT INFORMATION \n Use information already available (previous UN reports, publications by specialized research centres, etc.). Research has often already been undertaken in conflict-affected States, particularly if a country has previously implemented a DDR programme. \n Engage with national authorities. Talk to their experts and obtain available data (e.g., previous SALW survey data, DDR data, national registers of weapons, and records of thefts\/looting from storage facilities). \n Ensure that all data collected on individuals is sex and age disaggregated. \n If ceasefires have been implemented, warring parties may have provided a declaration of forces for the purpose of monitoring the ceasefire. Such declarations typically include information related to the disengagement and movement of troops and weapons. \n Obtain data from seizures of weapons or discoveries of caches that provide insight into which armed forces and groups possess which materiel, as well as its origins and the context in which the seizures take place. \n If the DDR programme is to be implemented with the support of a UN peace operation, organize regular meetings to compare observations and information with other UN agencies collecting data on security issues and armed forces and groups, as well as with other relevant international organizations and diplomatic representations. \n Develop a network of key informants, including by meeting with ex-combatants and with male and female representatives and members of armed forces and groups. This should be done in line with the policy of the UN mission on engaging with armed forces and groups, if any, and in line with the UN\u2019s guidance on the modalities of engagement with armed forces and groups (see Annex B). \n Meet with community leaders, women\u2019s organizations, youth groups, human rights organizations and other civil society groups. \n Search for information and images on social media (e.g., monitor Facebook pages of armed groups and national defence forces).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -69330,14 +69330,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Information collection", "Heading3": "5.1.1 Integrated assessment", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n If the DDR programme is to be implemented with the support of a UN peace operation, organize regular meetings to compare observations and information with other UN agencies collecting data on security issues and armed forces and groups, as well as with other relevant international organizations and diplomatic representations.", + "Sentence": "\n If the DDR programme is to be implemented with the support of a UN peace operation, organize regular meetings to compare observations and information with other UN agencies collecting data on security issues and armed forces and groups, as well as with other relevant international organizations and diplomatic representations.", "newParagraph": "box 1 collect information n use information already available previous un report publication specialized research centre etc research often already undertaken conflictaffected state particularly country previously implemented ddr programme n engage national authority talk expert obtain available data eg previous salw survey data ddr data national register weapon record theftslooting storage facility n ensure data collected individual sex age disaggregated n ceasefires implemented warring party may provided declaration force purpose monitoring ceasefire declaration typically include information related disengagement movement troop weapon n obtain data seizure weapon discovery cache provide insight armed force group posse materiel well origin context seizure take place n ddr programme implemented support un peace operation organize regular meeting compare observation information un agency collecting data security issue armed force group well relevant international organization diplomatic representation n develop network key informant including meeting excombatants male female representative member armed force group done line policy un mission engaging armed force group line un guidance modality engagement armed force group see annex b n meet community leader woman organization youth group human right organization civil society group n search information image social medium eg monitor facebook page armed group national defence force", "ProcessedSent": "n ddr programme implemented support un peace operation organize regular meeting compare observation information un agency collecting data security issue armed force group well relevant international organization diplomatic representation", "SentID": 3851 }, { "ParagraphID": 1243, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: HOW TO COLLECT INFORMATION \\n Use information already available (previous UN reports, publications by specialized research centres, etc.). Research has often already been undertaken in conflict-affected States, particularly if a country has previously implemented a DDR programme. \\n Engage with national authorities. Talk to their experts and obtain available data (e.g., previous SALW survey data, DDR data, national registers of weapons, and records of thefts\/looting from storage facilities). \\n Ensure that all data collected on individuals is sex and age disaggregated. \\n If ceasefires have been implemented, warring parties may have provided a declaration of forces for the purpose of monitoring the ceasefire. Such declarations typically include information related to the disengagement and movement of troops and weapons. \\n Obtain data from seizures of weapons or discoveries of caches that provide insight into which armed forces and groups possess which materiel, as well as its origins and the context in which the seizures take place. \\n If the DDR programme is to be implemented with the support of a UN peace operation, organize regular meetings to compare observations and information with other UN agencies collecting data on security issues and armed forces and groups, as well as with other relevant international organizations and diplomatic representations. \\n Develop a network of key informants, including by meeting with ex-combatants and with male and female representatives and members of armed forces and groups. This should be done in line with the policy of the UN mission on engaging with armed forces and groups, if any, and in line with the UN\u2019s guidance on the modalities of engagement with armed forces and groups (see Annex B). \\n Meet with community leaders, women\u2019s organizations, youth groups, human rights organizations and other civil society groups. \\n Search for information and images on social media (e.g., monitor Facebook pages of armed groups and national defence forces).", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: HOW TO COLLECT INFORMATION \n Use information already available (previous UN reports, publications by specialized research centres, etc.). Research has often already been undertaken in conflict-affected States, particularly if a country has previously implemented a DDR programme. \n Engage with national authorities. Talk to their experts and obtain available data (e.g., previous SALW survey data, DDR data, national registers of weapons, and records of thefts\/looting from storage facilities). \n Ensure that all data collected on individuals is sex and age disaggregated. \n If ceasefires have been implemented, warring parties may have provided a declaration of forces for the purpose of monitoring the ceasefire. Such declarations typically include information related to the disengagement and movement of troops and weapons. \n Obtain data from seizures of weapons or discoveries of caches that provide insight into which armed forces and groups possess which materiel, as well as its origins and the context in which the seizures take place. \n If the DDR programme is to be implemented with the support of a UN peace operation, organize regular meetings to compare observations and information with other UN agencies collecting data on security issues and armed forces and groups, as well as with other relevant international organizations and diplomatic representations. \n Develop a network of key informants, including by meeting with ex-combatants and with male and female representatives and members of armed forces and groups. This should be done in line with the policy of the UN mission on engaging with armed forces and groups, if any, and in line with the UN\u2019s guidance on the modalities of engagement with armed forces and groups (see Annex B). \n Meet with community leaders, women\u2019s organizations, youth groups, human rights organizations and other civil society groups. \n Search for information and images on social media (e.g., monitor Facebook pages of armed groups and national defence forces).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -69348,14 +69348,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Information collection", "Heading3": "5.1.1 Integrated assessment", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Develop a network of key informants, including by meeting with ex-combatants and with male and female representatives and members of armed forces and groups.", + "Sentence": "\n Develop a network of key informants, including by meeting with ex-combatants and with male and female representatives and members of armed forces and groups.", "newParagraph": "box 1 collect information n use information already available previous un report publication specialized research centre etc research often already undertaken conflictaffected state particularly country previously implemented ddr programme n engage national authority talk expert obtain available data eg previous salw survey data ddr data national register weapon record theftslooting storage facility n ensure data collected individual sex age disaggregated n ceasefires implemented warring party may provided declaration force purpose monitoring ceasefire declaration typically include information related disengagement movement troop weapon n obtain data seizure weapon discovery cache provide insight armed force group posse materiel well origin context seizure take place n ddr programme implemented support un peace operation organize regular meeting compare observation information un agency collecting data security issue armed force group well relevant international organization diplomatic representation n develop network key informant including meeting excombatants male female representative member armed force group done line policy un mission engaging armed force group line un guidance modality engagement armed force group see annex b n meet community leader woman organization youth group human right organization civil society group n search information image social medium eg monitor facebook page armed group national defence force", "ProcessedSent": "n develop network key informant including meeting excombatants male female representative member armed force group", "SentID": 3852 }, { "ParagraphID": 1243, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: HOW TO COLLECT INFORMATION \\n Use information already available (previous UN reports, publications by specialized research centres, etc.). Research has often already been undertaken in conflict-affected States, particularly if a country has previously implemented a DDR programme. \\n Engage with national authorities. Talk to their experts and obtain available data (e.g., previous SALW survey data, DDR data, national registers of weapons, and records of thefts\/looting from storage facilities). \\n Ensure that all data collected on individuals is sex and age disaggregated. \\n If ceasefires have been implemented, warring parties may have provided a declaration of forces for the purpose of monitoring the ceasefire. Such declarations typically include information related to the disengagement and movement of troops and weapons. \\n Obtain data from seizures of weapons or discoveries of caches that provide insight into which armed forces and groups possess which materiel, as well as its origins and the context in which the seizures take place. \\n If the DDR programme is to be implemented with the support of a UN peace operation, organize regular meetings to compare observations and information with other UN agencies collecting data on security issues and armed forces and groups, as well as with other relevant international organizations and diplomatic representations. \\n Develop a network of key informants, including by meeting with ex-combatants and with male and female representatives and members of armed forces and groups. This should be done in line with the policy of the UN mission on engaging with armed forces and groups, if any, and in line with the UN\u2019s guidance on the modalities of engagement with armed forces and groups (see Annex B). \\n Meet with community leaders, women\u2019s organizations, youth groups, human rights organizations and other civil society groups. \\n Search for information and images on social media (e.g., monitor Facebook pages of armed groups and national defence forces).", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: HOW TO COLLECT INFORMATION \n Use information already available (previous UN reports, publications by specialized research centres, etc.). Research has often already been undertaken in conflict-affected States, particularly if a country has previously implemented a DDR programme. \n Engage with national authorities. Talk to their experts and obtain available data (e.g., previous SALW survey data, DDR data, national registers of weapons, and records of thefts\/looting from storage facilities). \n Ensure that all data collected on individuals is sex and age disaggregated. \n If ceasefires have been implemented, warring parties may have provided a declaration of forces for the purpose of monitoring the ceasefire. Such declarations typically include information related to the disengagement and movement of troops and weapons. \n Obtain data from seizures of weapons or discoveries of caches that provide insight into which armed forces and groups possess which materiel, as well as its origins and the context in which the seizures take place. \n If the DDR programme is to be implemented with the support of a UN peace operation, organize regular meetings to compare observations and information with other UN agencies collecting data on security issues and armed forces and groups, as well as with other relevant international organizations and diplomatic representations. \n Develop a network of key informants, including by meeting with ex-combatants and with male and female representatives and members of armed forces and groups. This should be done in line with the policy of the UN mission on engaging with armed forces and groups, if any, and in line with the UN\u2019s guidance on the modalities of engagement with armed forces and groups (see Annex B). \n Meet with community leaders, women\u2019s organizations, youth groups, human rights organizations and other civil society groups. \n Search for information and images on social media (e.g., monitor Facebook pages of armed groups and national defence forces).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -69373,7 +69373,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1243, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: HOW TO COLLECT INFORMATION \\n Use information already available (previous UN reports, publications by specialized research centres, etc.). Research has often already been undertaken in conflict-affected States, particularly if a country has previously implemented a DDR programme. \\n Engage with national authorities. Talk to their experts and obtain available data (e.g., previous SALW survey data, DDR data, national registers of weapons, and records of thefts\/looting from storage facilities). \\n Ensure that all data collected on individuals is sex and age disaggregated. \\n If ceasefires have been implemented, warring parties may have provided a declaration of forces for the purpose of monitoring the ceasefire. Such declarations typically include information related to the disengagement and movement of troops and weapons. \\n Obtain data from seizures of weapons or discoveries of caches that provide insight into which armed forces and groups possess which materiel, as well as its origins and the context in which the seizures take place. \\n If the DDR programme is to be implemented with the support of a UN peace operation, organize regular meetings to compare observations and information with other UN agencies collecting data on security issues and armed forces and groups, as well as with other relevant international organizations and diplomatic representations. \\n Develop a network of key informants, including by meeting with ex-combatants and with male and female representatives and members of armed forces and groups. This should be done in line with the policy of the UN mission on engaging with armed forces and groups, if any, and in line with the UN\u2019s guidance on the modalities of engagement with armed forces and groups (see Annex B). \\n Meet with community leaders, women\u2019s organizations, youth groups, human rights organizations and other civil society groups. \\n Search for information and images on social media (e.g., monitor Facebook pages of armed groups and national defence forces).", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: HOW TO COLLECT INFORMATION \n Use information already available (previous UN reports, publications by specialized research centres, etc.). Research has often already been undertaken in conflict-affected States, particularly if a country has previously implemented a DDR programme. \n Engage with national authorities. Talk to their experts and obtain available data (e.g., previous SALW survey data, DDR data, national registers of weapons, and records of thefts\/looting from storage facilities). \n Ensure that all data collected on individuals is sex and age disaggregated. \n If ceasefires have been implemented, warring parties may have provided a declaration of forces for the purpose of monitoring the ceasefire. Such declarations typically include information related to the disengagement and movement of troops and weapons. \n Obtain data from seizures of weapons or discoveries of caches that provide insight into which armed forces and groups possess which materiel, as well as its origins and the context in which the seizures take place. \n If the DDR programme is to be implemented with the support of a UN peace operation, organize regular meetings to compare observations and information with other UN agencies collecting data on security issues and armed forces and groups, as well as with other relevant international organizations and diplomatic representations. \n Develop a network of key informants, including by meeting with ex-combatants and with male and female representatives and members of armed forces and groups. This should be done in line with the policy of the UN mission on engaging with armed forces and groups, if any, and in line with the UN\u2019s guidance on the modalities of engagement with armed forces and groups (see Annex B). \n Meet with community leaders, women\u2019s organizations, youth groups, human rights organizations and other civil society groups. \n Search for information and images on social media (e.g., monitor Facebook pages of armed groups and national defence forces).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -69384,14 +69384,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Information collection", "Heading3": "5.1.1 Integrated assessment", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Meet with community leaders, women\u2019s organizations, youth groups, human rights organizations and other civil society groups.", + "Sentence": "\n Meet with community leaders, women\u2019s organizations, youth groups, human rights organizations and other civil society groups.", "newParagraph": "box 1 collect information n use information already available previous un report publication specialized research centre etc research often already undertaken conflictaffected state particularly country previously implemented ddr programme n engage national authority talk expert obtain available data eg previous salw survey data ddr data national register weapon record theftslooting storage facility n ensure data collected individual sex age disaggregated n ceasefires implemented warring party may provided declaration force purpose monitoring ceasefire declaration typically include information related disengagement movement troop weapon n obtain data seizure weapon discovery cache provide insight armed force group posse materiel well origin context seizure take place n ddr programme implemented support un peace operation organize regular meeting compare observation information un agency collecting data security issue armed force group well relevant international organization diplomatic representation n develop network key informant including meeting excombatants male female representative member armed force group done line policy un mission engaging armed force group line un guidance modality engagement armed force group see annex b n meet community leader woman organization youth group human right organization civil society group n search information image social medium eg monitor facebook page armed group national defence force", "ProcessedSent": "n meet community leader woman organization youth group human right organization civil society group", "SentID": 3854 }, { "ParagraphID": 1243, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: HOW TO COLLECT INFORMATION \\n Use information already available (previous UN reports, publications by specialized research centres, etc.). Research has often already been undertaken in conflict-affected States, particularly if a country has previously implemented a DDR programme. \\n Engage with national authorities. Talk to their experts and obtain available data (e.g., previous SALW survey data, DDR data, national registers of weapons, and records of thefts\/looting from storage facilities). \\n Ensure that all data collected on individuals is sex and age disaggregated. \\n If ceasefires have been implemented, warring parties may have provided a declaration of forces for the purpose of monitoring the ceasefire. Such declarations typically include information related to the disengagement and movement of troops and weapons. \\n Obtain data from seizures of weapons or discoveries of caches that provide insight into which armed forces and groups possess which materiel, as well as its origins and the context in which the seizures take place. \\n If the DDR programme is to be implemented with the support of a UN peace operation, organize regular meetings to compare observations and information with other UN agencies collecting data on security issues and armed forces and groups, as well as with other relevant international organizations and diplomatic representations. \\n Develop a network of key informants, including by meeting with ex-combatants and with male and female representatives and members of armed forces and groups. This should be done in line with the policy of the UN mission on engaging with armed forces and groups, if any, and in line with the UN\u2019s guidance on the modalities of engagement with armed forces and groups (see Annex B). \\n Meet with community leaders, women\u2019s organizations, youth groups, human rights organizations and other civil society groups. \\n Search for information and images on social media (e.g., monitor Facebook pages of armed groups and national defence forces).", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: HOW TO COLLECT INFORMATION \n Use information already available (previous UN reports, publications by specialized research centres, etc.). Research has often already been undertaken in conflict-affected States, particularly if a country has previously implemented a DDR programme. \n Engage with national authorities. Talk to their experts and obtain available data (e.g., previous SALW survey data, DDR data, national registers of weapons, and records of thefts\/looting from storage facilities). \n Ensure that all data collected on individuals is sex and age disaggregated. \n If ceasefires have been implemented, warring parties may have provided a declaration of forces for the purpose of monitoring the ceasefire. Such declarations typically include information related to the disengagement and movement of troops and weapons. \n Obtain data from seizures of weapons or discoveries of caches that provide insight into which armed forces and groups possess which materiel, as well as its origins and the context in which the seizures take place. \n If the DDR programme is to be implemented with the support of a UN peace operation, organize regular meetings to compare observations and information with other UN agencies collecting data on security issues and armed forces and groups, as well as with other relevant international organizations and diplomatic representations. \n Develop a network of key informants, including by meeting with ex-combatants and with male and female representatives and members of armed forces and groups. This should be done in line with the policy of the UN mission on engaging with armed forces and groups, if any, and in line with the UN\u2019s guidance on the modalities of engagement with armed forces and groups (see Annex B). \n Meet with community leaders, women\u2019s organizations, youth groups, human rights organizations and other civil society groups. \n Search for information and images on social media (e.g., monitor Facebook pages of armed groups and national defence forces).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -69402,7 +69402,7 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Information collection", "Heading3": "5.1.1 Integrated assessment", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Search for information and images on social media (e.g., monitor Facebook pages of armed groups and national defence forces).", + "Sentence": "\n Search for information and images on social media (e.g., monitor Facebook pages of armed groups and national defence forces).", "newParagraph": "box 1 collect information n use information already available previous un report publication specialized research centre etc research often already undertaken conflictaffected state particularly country previously implemented ddr programme n engage national authority talk expert obtain available data eg previous salw survey data ddr data national register weapon record theftslooting storage facility n ensure data collected individual sex age disaggregated n ceasefires implemented warring party may provided declaration force purpose monitoring ceasefire declaration typically include information related disengagement movement troop weapon n obtain data seizure weapon discovery cache provide insight armed force group posse materiel well origin context seizure take place n ddr programme implemented support un peace operation organize regular meeting compare observation information un agency collecting data security issue armed force group well relevant international organization diplomatic representation n develop network key informant including meeting excombatants male female representative member armed force group done line policy un mission engaging armed force group line un guidance modality engagement armed force group see annex b n meet community leader woman organization youth group human right organization civil society group n search information image social medium eg monitor facebook page armed group national defence force", "ProcessedSent": "n search information image social medium eg monitor facebook page armed group national defence force", "SentID": 3855 @@ -69625,7 +69625,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1247, - "Paragraph": "The overarching aim of the disarmament component of a DDR programme is to control and reduce arms, ammunition and explosives held by combatants before demobilization in order to build confidence in the peace process, increase security and prevent a return to conflict. Clear operational objectives should also be developed and agreed. These may include: \\n A reduction in the number of weapons, ammunition and explosives possessed by, or available to, armed forces and groups; \\n A reduction in actual armed violence or the threat of it; \\n Optimally zero, or at the most minimal, casualties during the disarmament component; \\n An improvement in the perception of human security by men, women, boys, girls and youth within communities; \\n A public connection between the availability of weapons and armed violence in society; \\n The development of community awareness of the problem and hence community solidarity; \\n The reduction and disruption of the illicit trade of weapons within the DDR area of operations; \\n A reduction in the open visibility of weapons in the community; \\n A reduction in crimes committed with weapons, such as conflict-related sexual violence; \\n The development of norms against the illegal use of weapons.", + "Paragraph": "The overarching aim of the disarmament component of a DDR programme is to control and reduce arms, ammunition and explosives held by combatants before demobilization in order to build confidence in the peace process, increase security and prevent a return to conflict. Clear operational objectives should also be developed and agreed. These may include: \n A reduction in the number of weapons, ammunition and explosives possessed by, or available to, armed forces and groups; \n A reduction in actual armed violence or the threat of it; \n Optimally zero, or at the most minimal, casualties during the disarmament component; \n An improvement in the perception of human security by men, women, boys, girls and youth within communities; \n A public connection between the availability of weapons and armed violence in society; \n The development of community awareness of the problem and hence community solidarity; \n The reduction and disruption of the illicit trade of weapons within the DDR area of operations; \n A reduction in the open visibility of weapons in the community; \n A reduction in crimes committed with weapons, such as conflict-related sexual violence; \n The development of norms against the illegal use of weapons.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -69643,7 +69643,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1247, - "Paragraph": "The overarching aim of the disarmament component of a DDR programme is to control and reduce arms, ammunition and explosives held by combatants before demobilization in order to build confidence in the peace process, increase security and prevent a return to conflict. Clear operational objectives should also be developed and agreed. These may include: \\n A reduction in the number of weapons, ammunition and explosives possessed by, or available to, armed forces and groups; \\n A reduction in actual armed violence or the threat of it; \\n Optimally zero, or at the most minimal, casualties during the disarmament component; \\n An improvement in the perception of human security by men, women, boys, girls and youth within communities; \\n A public connection between the availability of weapons and armed violence in society; \\n The development of community awareness of the problem and hence community solidarity; \\n The reduction and disruption of the illicit trade of weapons within the DDR area of operations; \\n A reduction in the open visibility of weapons in the community; \\n A reduction in crimes committed with weapons, such as conflict-related sexual violence; \\n The development of norms against the illegal use of weapons.", + "Paragraph": "The overarching aim of the disarmament component of a DDR programme is to control and reduce arms, ammunition and explosives held by combatants before demobilization in order to build confidence in the peace process, increase security and prevent a return to conflict. Clear operational objectives should also be developed and agreed. These may include: \n A reduction in the number of weapons, ammunition and explosives possessed by, or available to, armed forces and groups; \n A reduction in actual armed violence or the threat of it; \n Optimally zero, or at the most minimal, casualties during the disarmament component; \n An improvement in the perception of human security by men, women, boys, girls and youth within communities; \n A public connection between the availability of weapons and armed violence in society; \n The development of community awareness of the problem and hence community solidarity; \n The reduction and disruption of the illicit trade of weapons within the DDR area of operations; \n A reduction in the open visibility of weapons in the community; \n A reduction in crimes committed with weapons, such as conflict-related sexual violence; \n The development of norms against the illegal use of weapons.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -69661,7 +69661,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1247, - "Paragraph": "The overarching aim of the disarmament component of a DDR programme is to control and reduce arms, ammunition and explosives held by combatants before demobilization in order to build confidence in the peace process, increase security and prevent a return to conflict. Clear operational objectives should also be developed and agreed. These may include: \\n A reduction in the number of weapons, ammunition and explosives possessed by, or available to, armed forces and groups; \\n A reduction in actual armed violence or the threat of it; \\n Optimally zero, or at the most minimal, casualties during the disarmament component; \\n An improvement in the perception of human security by men, women, boys, girls and youth within communities; \\n A public connection between the availability of weapons and armed violence in society; \\n The development of community awareness of the problem and hence community solidarity; \\n The reduction and disruption of the illicit trade of weapons within the DDR area of operations; \\n A reduction in the open visibility of weapons in the community; \\n A reduction in crimes committed with weapons, such as conflict-related sexual violence; \\n The development of norms against the illegal use of weapons.", + "Paragraph": "The overarching aim of the disarmament component of a DDR programme is to control and reduce arms, ammunition and explosives held by combatants before demobilization in order to build confidence in the peace process, increase security and prevent a return to conflict. Clear operational objectives should also be developed and agreed. These may include: \n A reduction in the number of weapons, ammunition and explosives possessed by, or available to, armed forces and groups; \n A reduction in actual armed violence or the threat of it; \n Optimally zero, or at the most minimal, casualties during the disarmament component; \n An improvement in the perception of human security by men, women, boys, girls and youth within communities; \n A public connection between the availability of weapons and armed violence in society; \n The development of community awareness of the problem and hence community solidarity; \n The reduction and disruption of the illicit trade of weapons within the DDR area of operations; \n A reduction in the open visibility of weapons in the community; \n A reduction in crimes committed with weapons, such as conflict-related sexual violence; \n The development of norms against the illegal use of weapons.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -69672,14 +69672,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2 Objectives of disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "These may include: \\n A reduction in the number of weapons, ammunition and explosives possessed by, or available to, armed forces and groups; \\n A reduction in actual armed violence or the threat of it; \\n Optimally zero, or at the most minimal, casualties during the disarmament component; \\n An improvement in the perception of human security by men, women, boys, girls and youth within communities; \\n A public connection between the availability of weapons and armed violence in society; \\n The development of community awareness of the problem and hence community solidarity; \\n The reduction and disruption of the illicit trade of weapons within the DDR area of operations; \\n A reduction in the open visibility of weapons in the community; \\n A reduction in crimes committed with weapons, such as conflict-related sexual violence; \\n The development of norms against the illegal use of weapons.", + "Sentence": "These may include: \n A reduction in the number of weapons, ammunition and explosives possessed by, or available to, armed forces and groups; \n A reduction in actual armed violence or the threat of it; \n Optimally zero, or at the most minimal, casualties during the disarmament component; \n An improvement in the perception of human security by men, women, boys, girls and youth within communities; \n A public connection between the availability of weapons and armed violence in society; \n The development of community awareness of the problem and hence community solidarity; \n The reduction and disruption of the illicit trade of weapons within the DDR area of operations; \n A reduction in the open visibility of weapons in the community; \n A reduction in crimes committed with weapons, such as conflict-related sexual violence; \n The development of norms against the illegal use of weapons.", "newParagraph": "overarching aim disarmament component ddr programme control reduce arm ammunition explosive held combatant demobilization order build confidence peace process increase security prevent return conflict clear operational objective also developed agreed may include n reduction number weapon ammunition explosive possessed available armed force group n reduction actual armed violence threat n optimally zero minimal casualty disarmament component n improvement perception human security men woman boy girl youth within community n public connection availability weapon armed violence society n development community awareness problem hence community solidarity n reduction disruption illicit trade weapon within ddr area operation n reduction open visibility weapon community n reduction crime committed weapon conflictrelated sexual violence n development norm illegal use weapon", "ProcessedSent": "may include n reduction number weapon ammunition explosive possessed available armed force group n reduction actual armed violence threat n optimally zero minimal casualty disarmament component n improvement perception human security men woman boy girl youth within community n public connection availability weapon armed violence society n development community awareness problem hence community solidarity n reduction disruption illicit trade weapon within ddr area operation n reduction open visibility weapon community n reduction crime committed weapon conflictrelated sexual violence n development norm illegal use weapon", "SentID": 3870 }, { "ParagraphID": 1248, - "Paragraph": "BOX 2: MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF DISARMAMENT \\n The disarmament objectives listed in section 5.2 could serve as a basis for the identification of performance indicators to track progress and assess the impact of disarmament interventions. Monitoring and evaluating the disarmament component of a DDR programme should form part of the overall monitoring and evaluation framework of the DDR process, and specific resources should be earmarked for this purpose (see IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR). \\n Standardized indicators to monitor and evaluate disarmament operations should be identified early in the DDR programme. Quantitative indicators could be developed in line with specific technical outputs providing clear measures, including the number of weapons and rounds of ammunition collected, the number of items recorded, marked and destroyed, or the number of items lost or stolen in the process. Qualitative indicators might include the evolution of the armed criminality rate in the target area, or perceptions of security in the target population disaggregated by sex and age. Information collection efforts and a weapons survey (see section 5.1) provide useful sources for identifying key indicators and measuring progress. \\n\\n Monitoring and evaluation should also verify that: \\n Gender- and age-specific risks to women and men have been adequately and equitably addressed. \\n Women and men participate in all aspects of the initiative \u2013 design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \\n The initiative contributes to gender equality.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 2: MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF DISARMAMENT \n The disarmament objectives listed in section 5.2 could serve as a basis for the identification of performance indicators to track progress and assess the impact of disarmament interventions. Monitoring and evaluating the disarmament component of a DDR programme should form part of the overall monitoring and evaluation framework of the DDR process, and specific resources should be earmarked for this purpose (see IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR). \n Standardized indicators to monitor and evaluate disarmament operations should be identified early in the DDR programme. Quantitative indicators could be developed in line with specific technical outputs providing clear measures, including the number of weapons and rounds of ammunition collected, the number of items recorded, marked and destroyed, or the number of items lost or stolen in the process. Qualitative indicators might include the evolution of the armed criminality rate in the target area, or perceptions of security in the target population disaggregated by sex and age. Information collection efforts and a weapons survey (see section 5.1) provide useful sources for identifying key indicators and measuring progress. \n\n Monitoring and evaluation should also verify that: \n Gender- and age-specific risks to women and men have been adequately and equitably addressed. \n Women and men participate in all aspects of the initiative \u2013 design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \n The initiative contributes to gender equality.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -69690,14 +69690,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2 Objectives of disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "BOX 2: MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF DISARMAMENT \\n The disarmament objectives listed in section 5.2 could serve as a basis for the identification of performance indicators to track progress and assess the impact of disarmament interventions.", + "Sentence": "BOX 2: MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF DISARMAMENT \n The disarmament objectives listed in section 5.2 could serve as a basis for the identification of performance indicators to track progress and assess the impact of disarmament interventions.", "newParagraph": "box 2 monitoring evaluation disarmament n disarmament objective listed section 52 could serve basis identification performance indicator track progress ass impact disarmament intervention monitoring evaluating disarmament component ddr programme form part overall monitoring evaluation framework ddr process specific resource earmarked purpose see iddrs 350 monitoring evaluation ddr n standardized indicator monitor evaluate disarmament operation identified early ddr programme quantitative indicator could developed line specific technical output providing clear measure including number weapon round ammunition collected number item recorded marked destroyed number item lost stolen process qualitative indicator might include evolution armed criminality rate target area perception security target population disaggregated sex age information collection effort weapon survey see section 51 provide useful source identifying key indicator measuring progress nn monitoring evaluation also verify n gender agespecific risk woman men adequately equitably addressed n woman men participate aspect initiative design implementation monitoring evaluation n initiative contributes gender equality", "ProcessedSent": "box 2 monitoring evaluation disarmament n disarmament objective listed section 52 could serve basis identification performance indicator track progress ass impact disarmament intervention", "SentID": 3871 }, { "ParagraphID": 1248, - "Paragraph": "BOX 2: MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF DISARMAMENT \\n The disarmament objectives listed in section 5.2 could serve as a basis for the identification of performance indicators to track progress and assess the impact of disarmament interventions. Monitoring and evaluating the disarmament component of a DDR programme should form part of the overall monitoring and evaluation framework of the DDR process, and specific resources should be earmarked for this purpose (see IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR). \\n Standardized indicators to monitor and evaluate disarmament operations should be identified early in the DDR programme. Quantitative indicators could be developed in line with specific technical outputs providing clear measures, including the number of weapons and rounds of ammunition collected, the number of items recorded, marked and destroyed, or the number of items lost or stolen in the process. Qualitative indicators might include the evolution of the armed criminality rate in the target area, or perceptions of security in the target population disaggregated by sex and age. Information collection efforts and a weapons survey (see section 5.1) provide useful sources for identifying key indicators and measuring progress. \\n\\n Monitoring and evaluation should also verify that: \\n Gender- and age-specific risks to women and men have been adequately and equitably addressed. \\n Women and men participate in all aspects of the initiative \u2013 design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \\n The initiative contributes to gender equality.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 2: MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF DISARMAMENT \n The disarmament objectives listed in section 5.2 could serve as a basis for the identification of performance indicators to track progress and assess the impact of disarmament interventions. Monitoring and evaluating the disarmament component of a DDR programme should form part of the overall monitoring and evaluation framework of the DDR process, and specific resources should be earmarked for this purpose (see IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR). \n Standardized indicators to monitor and evaluate disarmament operations should be identified early in the DDR programme. Quantitative indicators could be developed in line with specific technical outputs providing clear measures, including the number of weapons and rounds of ammunition collected, the number of items recorded, marked and destroyed, or the number of items lost or stolen in the process. Qualitative indicators might include the evolution of the armed criminality rate in the target area, or perceptions of security in the target population disaggregated by sex and age. Information collection efforts and a weapons survey (see section 5.1) provide useful sources for identifying key indicators and measuring progress. \n\n Monitoring and evaluation should also verify that: \n Gender- and age-specific risks to women and men have been adequately and equitably addressed. \n Women and men participate in all aspects of the initiative \u2013 design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \n The initiative contributes to gender equality.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -69715,7 +69715,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1248, - "Paragraph": "BOX 2: MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF DISARMAMENT \\n The disarmament objectives listed in section 5.2 could serve as a basis for the identification of performance indicators to track progress and assess the impact of disarmament interventions. Monitoring and evaluating the disarmament component of a DDR programme should form part of the overall monitoring and evaluation framework of the DDR process, and specific resources should be earmarked for this purpose (see IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR). \\n Standardized indicators to monitor and evaluate disarmament operations should be identified early in the DDR programme. Quantitative indicators could be developed in line with specific technical outputs providing clear measures, including the number of weapons and rounds of ammunition collected, the number of items recorded, marked and destroyed, or the number of items lost or stolen in the process. Qualitative indicators might include the evolution of the armed criminality rate in the target area, or perceptions of security in the target population disaggregated by sex and age. Information collection efforts and a weapons survey (see section 5.1) provide useful sources for identifying key indicators and measuring progress. \\n\\n Monitoring and evaluation should also verify that: \\n Gender- and age-specific risks to women and men have been adequately and equitably addressed. \\n Women and men participate in all aspects of the initiative \u2013 design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \\n The initiative contributes to gender equality.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 2: MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF DISARMAMENT \n The disarmament objectives listed in section 5.2 could serve as a basis for the identification of performance indicators to track progress and assess the impact of disarmament interventions. Monitoring and evaluating the disarmament component of a DDR programme should form part of the overall monitoring and evaluation framework of the DDR process, and specific resources should be earmarked for this purpose (see IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR). \n Standardized indicators to monitor and evaluate disarmament operations should be identified early in the DDR programme. Quantitative indicators could be developed in line with specific technical outputs providing clear measures, including the number of weapons and rounds of ammunition collected, the number of items recorded, marked and destroyed, or the number of items lost or stolen in the process. Qualitative indicators might include the evolution of the armed criminality rate in the target area, or perceptions of security in the target population disaggregated by sex and age. Information collection efforts and a weapons survey (see section 5.1) provide useful sources for identifying key indicators and measuring progress. \n\n Monitoring and evaluation should also verify that: \n Gender- and age-specific risks to women and men have been adequately and equitably addressed. \n Women and men participate in all aspects of the initiative \u2013 design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \n The initiative contributes to gender equality.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -69726,14 +69726,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2 Objectives of disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Standardized indicators to monitor and evaluate disarmament operations should be identified early in the DDR programme.", + "Sentence": "\n Standardized indicators to monitor and evaluate disarmament operations should be identified early in the DDR programme.", "newParagraph": "box 2 monitoring evaluation disarmament n disarmament objective listed section 52 could serve basis identification performance indicator track progress ass impact disarmament intervention monitoring evaluating disarmament component ddr programme form part overall monitoring evaluation framework ddr process specific resource earmarked purpose see iddrs 350 monitoring evaluation ddr n standardized indicator monitor evaluate disarmament operation identified early ddr programme quantitative indicator could developed line specific technical output providing clear measure including number weapon round ammunition collected number item recorded marked destroyed number item lost stolen process qualitative indicator might include evolution armed criminality rate target area perception security target population disaggregated sex age information collection effort weapon survey see section 51 provide useful source identifying key indicator measuring progress nn monitoring evaluation also verify n gender agespecific risk woman men adequately equitably addressed n woman men participate aspect initiative design implementation monitoring evaluation n initiative contributes gender equality", "ProcessedSent": "n standardized indicator monitor evaluate disarmament operation identified early ddr programme", "SentID": 3873 }, { "ParagraphID": 1248, - "Paragraph": "BOX 2: MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF DISARMAMENT \\n The disarmament objectives listed in section 5.2 could serve as a basis for the identification of performance indicators to track progress and assess the impact of disarmament interventions. Monitoring and evaluating the disarmament component of a DDR programme should form part of the overall monitoring and evaluation framework of the DDR process, and specific resources should be earmarked for this purpose (see IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR). \\n Standardized indicators to monitor and evaluate disarmament operations should be identified early in the DDR programme. Quantitative indicators could be developed in line with specific technical outputs providing clear measures, including the number of weapons and rounds of ammunition collected, the number of items recorded, marked and destroyed, or the number of items lost or stolen in the process. Qualitative indicators might include the evolution of the armed criminality rate in the target area, or perceptions of security in the target population disaggregated by sex and age. Information collection efforts and a weapons survey (see section 5.1) provide useful sources for identifying key indicators and measuring progress. \\n\\n Monitoring and evaluation should also verify that: \\n Gender- and age-specific risks to women and men have been adequately and equitably addressed. \\n Women and men participate in all aspects of the initiative \u2013 design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \\n The initiative contributes to gender equality.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 2: MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF DISARMAMENT \n The disarmament objectives listed in section 5.2 could serve as a basis for the identification of performance indicators to track progress and assess the impact of disarmament interventions. Monitoring and evaluating the disarmament component of a DDR programme should form part of the overall monitoring and evaluation framework of the DDR process, and specific resources should be earmarked for this purpose (see IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR). \n Standardized indicators to monitor and evaluate disarmament operations should be identified early in the DDR programme. Quantitative indicators could be developed in line with specific technical outputs providing clear measures, including the number of weapons and rounds of ammunition collected, the number of items recorded, marked and destroyed, or the number of items lost or stolen in the process. Qualitative indicators might include the evolution of the armed criminality rate in the target area, or perceptions of security in the target population disaggregated by sex and age. Information collection efforts and a weapons survey (see section 5.1) provide useful sources for identifying key indicators and measuring progress. \n\n Monitoring and evaluation should also verify that: \n Gender- and age-specific risks to women and men have been adequately and equitably addressed. \n Women and men participate in all aspects of the initiative \u2013 design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \n The initiative contributes to gender equality.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -69751,7 +69751,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1248, - "Paragraph": "BOX 2: MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF DISARMAMENT \\n The disarmament objectives listed in section 5.2 could serve as a basis for the identification of performance indicators to track progress and assess the impact of disarmament interventions. Monitoring and evaluating the disarmament component of a DDR programme should form part of the overall monitoring and evaluation framework of the DDR process, and specific resources should be earmarked for this purpose (see IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR). \\n Standardized indicators to monitor and evaluate disarmament operations should be identified early in the DDR programme. Quantitative indicators could be developed in line with specific technical outputs providing clear measures, including the number of weapons and rounds of ammunition collected, the number of items recorded, marked and destroyed, or the number of items lost or stolen in the process. Qualitative indicators might include the evolution of the armed criminality rate in the target area, or perceptions of security in the target population disaggregated by sex and age. Information collection efforts and a weapons survey (see section 5.1) provide useful sources for identifying key indicators and measuring progress. \\n\\n Monitoring and evaluation should also verify that: \\n Gender- and age-specific risks to women and men have been adequately and equitably addressed. \\n Women and men participate in all aspects of the initiative \u2013 design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \\n The initiative contributes to gender equality.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 2: MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF DISARMAMENT \n The disarmament objectives listed in section 5.2 could serve as a basis for the identification of performance indicators to track progress and assess the impact of disarmament interventions. Monitoring and evaluating the disarmament component of a DDR programme should form part of the overall monitoring and evaluation framework of the DDR process, and specific resources should be earmarked for this purpose (see IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR). \n Standardized indicators to monitor and evaluate disarmament operations should be identified early in the DDR programme. Quantitative indicators could be developed in line with specific technical outputs providing clear measures, including the number of weapons and rounds of ammunition collected, the number of items recorded, marked and destroyed, or the number of items lost or stolen in the process. Qualitative indicators might include the evolution of the armed criminality rate in the target area, or perceptions of security in the target population disaggregated by sex and age. Information collection efforts and a weapons survey (see section 5.1) provide useful sources for identifying key indicators and measuring progress. \n\n Monitoring and evaluation should also verify that: \n Gender- and age-specific risks to women and men have been adequately and equitably addressed. \n Women and men participate in all aspects of the initiative \u2013 design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \n The initiative contributes to gender equality.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -69769,7 +69769,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1248, - "Paragraph": "BOX 2: MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF DISARMAMENT \\n The disarmament objectives listed in section 5.2 could serve as a basis for the identification of performance indicators to track progress and assess the impact of disarmament interventions. Monitoring and evaluating the disarmament component of a DDR programme should form part of the overall monitoring and evaluation framework of the DDR process, and specific resources should be earmarked for this purpose (see IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR). \\n Standardized indicators to monitor and evaluate disarmament operations should be identified early in the DDR programme. Quantitative indicators could be developed in line with specific technical outputs providing clear measures, including the number of weapons and rounds of ammunition collected, the number of items recorded, marked and destroyed, or the number of items lost or stolen in the process. Qualitative indicators might include the evolution of the armed criminality rate in the target area, or perceptions of security in the target population disaggregated by sex and age. Information collection efforts and a weapons survey (see section 5.1) provide useful sources for identifying key indicators and measuring progress. \\n\\n Monitoring and evaluation should also verify that: \\n Gender- and age-specific risks to women and men have been adequately and equitably addressed. \\n Women and men participate in all aspects of the initiative \u2013 design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \\n The initiative contributes to gender equality.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 2: MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF DISARMAMENT \n The disarmament objectives listed in section 5.2 could serve as a basis for the identification of performance indicators to track progress and assess the impact of disarmament interventions. Monitoring and evaluating the disarmament component of a DDR programme should form part of the overall monitoring and evaluation framework of the DDR process, and specific resources should be earmarked for this purpose (see IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR). \n Standardized indicators to monitor and evaluate disarmament operations should be identified early in the DDR programme. Quantitative indicators could be developed in line with specific technical outputs providing clear measures, including the number of weapons and rounds of ammunition collected, the number of items recorded, marked and destroyed, or the number of items lost or stolen in the process. Qualitative indicators might include the evolution of the armed criminality rate in the target area, or perceptions of security in the target population disaggregated by sex and age. Information collection efforts and a weapons survey (see section 5.1) provide useful sources for identifying key indicators and measuring progress. \n\n Monitoring and evaluation should also verify that: \n Gender- and age-specific risks to women and men have been adequately and equitably addressed. \n Women and men participate in all aspects of the initiative \u2013 design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \n The initiative contributes to gender equality.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -69787,7 +69787,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1248, - "Paragraph": "BOX 2: MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF DISARMAMENT \\n The disarmament objectives listed in section 5.2 could serve as a basis for the identification of performance indicators to track progress and assess the impact of disarmament interventions. Monitoring and evaluating the disarmament component of a DDR programme should form part of the overall monitoring and evaluation framework of the DDR process, and specific resources should be earmarked for this purpose (see IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR). \\n Standardized indicators to monitor and evaluate disarmament operations should be identified early in the DDR programme. Quantitative indicators could be developed in line with specific technical outputs providing clear measures, including the number of weapons and rounds of ammunition collected, the number of items recorded, marked and destroyed, or the number of items lost or stolen in the process. Qualitative indicators might include the evolution of the armed criminality rate in the target area, or perceptions of security in the target population disaggregated by sex and age. Information collection efforts and a weapons survey (see section 5.1) provide useful sources for identifying key indicators and measuring progress. \\n\\n Monitoring and evaluation should also verify that: \\n Gender- and age-specific risks to women and men have been adequately and equitably addressed. \\n Women and men participate in all aspects of the initiative \u2013 design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \\n The initiative contributes to gender equality.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 2: MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF DISARMAMENT \n The disarmament objectives listed in section 5.2 could serve as a basis for the identification of performance indicators to track progress and assess the impact of disarmament interventions. Monitoring and evaluating the disarmament component of a DDR programme should form part of the overall monitoring and evaluation framework of the DDR process, and specific resources should be earmarked for this purpose (see IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR). \n Standardized indicators to monitor and evaluate disarmament operations should be identified early in the DDR programme. Quantitative indicators could be developed in line with specific technical outputs providing clear measures, including the number of weapons and rounds of ammunition collected, the number of items recorded, marked and destroyed, or the number of items lost or stolen in the process. Qualitative indicators might include the evolution of the armed criminality rate in the target area, or perceptions of security in the target population disaggregated by sex and age. Information collection efforts and a weapons survey (see section 5.1) provide useful sources for identifying key indicators and measuring progress. \n\n Monitoring and evaluation should also verify that: \n Gender- and age-specific risks to women and men have been adequately and equitably addressed. \n Women and men participate in all aspects of the initiative \u2013 design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \n The initiative contributes to gender equality.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -69798,14 +69798,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2 Objectives of disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Monitoring and evaluation should also verify that: \\n Gender- and age-specific risks to women and men have been adequately and equitably addressed.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Monitoring and evaluation should also verify that: \n Gender- and age-specific risks to women and men have been adequately and equitably addressed.", "newParagraph": "box 2 monitoring evaluation disarmament n disarmament objective listed section 52 could serve basis identification performance indicator track progress ass impact disarmament intervention monitoring evaluating disarmament component ddr programme form part overall monitoring evaluation framework ddr process specific resource earmarked purpose see iddrs 350 monitoring evaluation ddr n standardized indicator monitor evaluate disarmament operation identified early ddr programme quantitative indicator could developed line specific technical output providing clear measure including number weapon round ammunition collected number item recorded marked destroyed number item lost stolen process qualitative indicator might include evolution armed criminality rate target area perception security target population disaggregated sex age information collection effort weapon survey see section 51 provide useful source identifying key indicator measuring progress nn monitoring evaluation also verify n gender agespecific risk woman men adequately equitably addressed n woman men participate aspect initiative design implementation monitoring evaluation n initiative contributes gender equality", "ProcessedSent": "nn monitoring evaluation also verify n gender agespecific risk woman men adequately equitably addressed", "SentID": 3877 }, { "ParagraphID": 1248, - "Paragraph": "BOX 2: MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF DISARMAMENT \\n The disarmament objectives listed in section 5.2 could serve as a basis for the identification of performance indicators to track progress and assess the impact of disarmament interventions. Monitoring and evaluating the disarmament component of a DDR programme should form part of the overall monitoring and evaluation framework of the DDR process, and specific resources should be earmarked for this purpose (see IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR). \\n Standardized indicators to monitor and evaluate disarmament operations should be identified early in the DDR programme. Quantitative indicators could be developed in line with specific technical outputs providing clear measures, including the number of weapons and rounds of ammunition collected, the number of items recorded, marked and destroyed, or the number of items lost or stolen in the process. Qualitative indicators might include the evolution of the armed criminality rate in the target area, or perceptions of security in the target population disaggregated by sex and age. Information collection efforts and a weapons survey (see section 5.1) provide useful sources for identifying key indicators and measuring progress. \\n\\n Monitoring and evaluation should also verify that: \\n Gender- and age-specific risks to women and men have been adequately and equitably addressed. \\n Women and men participate in all aspects of the initiative \u2013 design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \\n The initiative contributes to gender equality.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 2: MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF DISARMAMENT \n The disarmament objectives listed in section 5.2 could serve as a basis for the identification of performance indicators to track progress and assess the impact of disarmament interventions. Monitoring and evaluating the disarmament component of a DDR programme should form part of the overall monitoring and evaluation framework of the DDR process, and specific resources should be earmarked for this purpose (see IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR). \n Standardized indicators to monitor and evaluate disarmament operations should be identified early in the DDR programme. Quantitative indicators could be developed in line with specific technical outputs providing clear measures, including the number of weapons and rounds of ammunition collected, the number of items recorded, marked and destroyed, or the number of items lost or stolen in the process. Qualitative indicators might include the evolution of the armed criminality rate in the target area, or perceptions of security in the target population disaggregated by sex and age. Information collection efforts and a weapons survey (see section 5.1) provide useful sources for identifying key indicators and measuring progress. \n\n Monitoring and evaluation should also verify that: \n Gender- and age-specific risks to women and men have been adequately and equitably addressed. \n Women and men participate in all aspects of the initiative \u2013 design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \n The initiative contributes to gender equality.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -69816,14 +69816,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2 Objectives of disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Women and men participate in all aspects of the initiative \u2013 design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation.", + "Sentence": "\n Women and men participate in all aspects of the initiative \u2013 design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation.", "newParagraph": "box 2 monitoring evaluation disarmament n disarmament objective listed section 52 could serve basis identification performance indicator track progress ass impact disarmament intervention monitoring evaluating disarmament component ddr programme form part overall monitoring evaluation framework ddr process specific resource earmarked purpose see iddrs 350 monitoring evaluation ddr n standardized indicator monitor evaluate disarmament operation identified early ddr programme quantitative indicator could developed line specific technical output providing clear measure including number weapon round ammunition collected number item recorded marked destroyed number item lost stolen process qualitative indicator might include evolution armed criminality rate target area perception security target population disaggregated sex age information collection effort weapon survey see section 51 provide useful source identifying key indicator measuring progress nn monitoring evaluation also verify n gender agespecific risk woman men adequately equitably addressed n woman men participate aspect initiative design implementation monitoring evaluation n initiative contributes gender equality", "ProcessedSent": "n woman men participate aspect initiative design implementation monitoring evaluation", "SentID": 3878 }, { "ParagraphID": 1248, - "Paragraph": "BOX 2: MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF DISARMAMENT \\n The disarmament objectives listed in section 5.2 could serve as a basis for the identification of performance indicators to track progress and assess the impact of disarmament interventions. Monitoring and evaluating the disarmament component of a DDR programme should form part of the overall monitoring and evaluation framework of the DDR process, and specific resources should be earmarked for this purpose (see IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR). \\n Standardized indicators to monitor and evaluate disarmament operations should be identified early in the DDR programme. Quantitative indicators could be developed in line with specific technical outputs providing clear measures, including the number of weapons and rounds of ammunition collected, the number of items recorded, marked and destroyed, or the number of items lost or stolen in the process. Qualitative indicators might include the evolution of the armed criminality rate in the target area, or perceptions of security in the target population disaggregated by sex and age. Information collection efforts and a weapons survey (see section 5.1) provide useful sources for identifying key indicators and measuring progress. \\n\\n Monitoring and evaluation should also verify that: \\n Gender- and age-specific risks to women and men have been adequately and equitably addressed. \\n Women and men participate in all aspects of the initiative \u2013 design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \\n The initiative contributes to gender equality.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 2: MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF DISARMAMENT \n The disarmament objectives listed in section 5.2 could serve as a basis for the identification of performance indicators to track progress and assess the impact of disarmament interventions. Monitoring and evaluating the disarmament component of a DDR programme should form part of the overall monitoring and evaluation framework of the DDR process, and specific resources should be earmarked for this purpose (see IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR). \n Standardized indicators to monitor and evaluate disarmament operations should be identified early in the DDR programme. Quantitative indicators could be developed in line with specific technical outputs providing clear measures, including the number of weapons and rounds of ammunition collected, the number of items recorded, marked and destroyed, or the number of items lost or stolen in the process. Qualitative indicators might include the evolution of the armed criminality rate in the target area, or perceptions of security in the target population disaggregated by sex and age. Information collection efforts and a weapons survey (see section 5.1) provide useful sources for identifying key indicators and measuring progress. \n\n Monitoring and evaluation should also verify that: \n Gender- and age-specific risks to women and men have been adequately and equitably addressed. \n Women and men participate in all aspects of the initiative \u2013 design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. \n The initiative contributes to gender equality.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -69834,7 +69834,7 @@ "Heading2": "5.2 Objectives of disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The initiative contributes to gender equality.", + "Sentence": "\n The initiative contributes to gender equality.", "newParagraph": "box 2 monitoring evaluation disarmament n disarmament objective listed section 52 could serve basis identification performance indicator track progress ass impact disarmament intervention monitoring evaluating disarmament component ddr programme form part overall monitoring evaluation framework ddr process specific resource earmarked purpose see iddrs 350 monitoring evaluation ddr n standardized indicator monitor evaluate disarmament operation identified early ddr programme quantitative indicator could developed line specific technical output providing clear measure including number weapon round ammunition collected number item recorded marked destroyed number item lost stolen process qualitative indicator might include evolution armed criminality rate target area perception security target population disaggregated sex age information collection effort weapon survey see section 51 provide useful source identifying key indicator measuring progress nn monitoring evaluation also verify n gender agespecific risk woman men adequately equitably addressed n woman men participate aspect initiative design implementation monitoring evaluation n initiative contributes gender equality", "ProcessedSent": "n initiative contributes gender equality", "SentID": 3879 @@ -69949,7 +69949,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1251, - "Paragraph": "There are likely to be several operational risks, depending on the context, including the following: \\n Threats to the safety and security of DDR programme personnel (both UN and non-UN): During the disarmament phase of the DDR programme, staff are likely to be in direct contact with armed individuals, including members of both armed forces and groups. Staff should be conscious not only of the risks associated with handling weapons, ammunition and explosives, but also of the risks of unpredictable behaviour as a result of the significant levels of stress that disarmament activities can generate among combatants and other stakeholders. \\n Avoid supporting weapons buy-back: UN supported DDR programmes shall avoid attaching monetary value to weapons as a means of encouraging their surrender by members of armed forces and groups. Weapons buy-back programmes within and outside DDR have proven to be inefficient and even counter-productive as they tend to fuel national and regional arms flows, which in the end can jeopardize the achievement of disarmament objectives in a DDR programme. Buy-back programmes can also have unintended societal consequences such as economically rewarding combatants and exacerbating existing gender inequalities \\n Disarmament of foreign combatants: Disarmament operations may also need to consider armed foreign combatants. Foreign combatants may be disarmed in the host country or at the border of the country of origin to which they will be returning. DDR programmes should plan for disarmament of foreign combatants within or outside repatriation agreements between the country of origin and the host country (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements). \\n Terrorism and violent extremism threats: DDR programmes are increasingly being conducted in contexts affected by terrorism. Disarmament operations in these contexts require the highest security safeguards and robust on-site WAM expertise to maximize the safety of all involved. DDR practitioners should be aware of the requirements imposed on States by UN Security Council resolutions 2370 (2017) and 2482 (2019) and Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum, in terms of, inter alia, ensuring that appropriate legal actions are taken against those who knowingly engage in providing terrorists with weapons.4 \\n Lack of sustainability: Disarmament operations shall not start unless the sustainability of funding and resources is guaranteed. Previous attempts to carry out disarmament operations with insufficient assets and funds have resulted in unconstructive, partial disarmament, a return to armed conflict, and the failure of the entire DDR process. The reconfiguring and closing of UN missions is another crucial moment that should be planned in advance. Such transitions often require handing over responsibility to national authorities or to the United Nations Country Team (UNCT). It is important to ensure these entities have the mandate and capacity to complete the DDR programme even after the withdrawal of UN mission resources.", + "Paragraph": "There are likely to be several operational risks, depending on the context, including the following: \n Threats to the safety and security of DDR programme personnel (both UN and non-UN): During the disarmament phase of the DDR programme, staff are likely to be in direct contact with armed individuals, including members of both armed forces and groups. Staff should be conscious not only of the risks associated with handling weapons, ammunition and explosives, but also of the risks of unpredictable behaviour as a result of the significant levels of stress that disarmament activities can generate among combatants and other stakeholders. \n Avoid supporting weapons buy-back: UN supported DDR programmes shall avoid attaching monetary value to weapons as a means of encouraging their surrender by members of armed forces and groups. Weapons buy-back programmes within and outside DDR have proven to be inefficient and even counter-productive as they tend to fuel national and regional arms flows, which in the end can jeopardize the achievement of disarmament objectives in a DDR programme. Buy-back programmes can also have unintended societal consequences such as economically rewarding combatants and exacerbating existing gender inequalities \n Disarmament of foreign combatants: Disarmament operations may also need to consider armed foreign combatants. Foreign combatants may be disarmed in the host country or at the border of the country of origin to which they will be returning. DDR programmes should plan for disarmament of foreign combatants within or outside repatriation agreements between the country of origin and the host country (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements). \n Terrorism and violent extremism threats: DDR programmes are increasingly being conducted in contexts affected by terrorism. Disarmament operations in these contexts require the highest security safeguards and robust on-site WAM expertise to maximize the safety of all involved. DDR practitioners should be aware of the requirements imposed on States by UN Security Council resolutions 2370 (2017) and 2482 (2019) and Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum, in terms of, inter alia, ensuring that appropriate legal actions are taken against those who knowingly engage in providing terrorists with weapons.4 \n Lack of sustainability: Disarmament operations shall not start unless the sustainability of funding and resources is guaranteed. Previous attempts to carry out disarmament operations with insufficient assets and funds have resulted in unconstructive, partial disarmament, a return to armed conflict, and the failure of the entire DDR process. The reconfiguring and closing of UN missions is another crucial moment that should be planned in advance. Such transitions often require handing over responsibility to national authorities or to the United Nations Country Team (UNCT). It is important to ensure these entities have the mandate and capacity to complete the DDR programme even after the withdrawal of UN mission resources.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -69960,14 +69960,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Risk and security assessment", "Heading3": "5.3.1 Operational risks", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "There are likely to be several operational risks, depending on the context, including the following: \\n Threats to the safety and security of DDR programme personnel (both UN and non-UN): During the disarmament phase of the DDR programme, staff are likely to be in direct contact with armed individuals, including members of both armed forces and groups.", + "Sentence": "There are likely to be several operational risks, depending on the context, including the following: \n Threats to the safety and security of DDR programme personnel (both UN and non-UN): During the disarmament phase of the DDR programme, staff are likely to be in direct contact with armed individuals, including members of both armed forces and groups.", "newParagraph": "likely several operational risk depending context including following n threat safety security ddr programme personnel un nonun disarmament phase ddr programme staff likely direct contact armed individual including member armed force group staff conscious risk associated handling weapon ammunition explosive also risk unpredictable behaviour result significant level stress disarmament activity generate among combatant stakeholder n avoid supporting weapon buyback un supported ddr programme shall avoid attaching monetary value weapon mean encouraging surrender member armed force group weapon buyback programme within outside ddr proven inefficient even counterproductive tend fuel national regional arm flow end jeopardize achievement disarmament objective ddr programme buyback programme also unintended societal consequence economically rewarding combatant exacerbating existing gender inequality n disarmament foreign combatant disarmament operation may also need consider armed foreign combatant foreign combatant may disarmed host country border country origin returning ddr programme plan disarmament foreign combatant within outside repatriation agreement country origin host country see iddrs 540 crossborder population movement n terrorism violent extremism threat ddr programme increasingly conducted context affected terrorism disarmament operation context require highest security safeguard robust onsite wam expertise maximize safety involved ddr practitioner aware requirement imposed state un security council resolution 2370 2017 2482 2019 council 2015 madrid guiding principle 2018 addendum term inter alia ensuring appropriate legal action taken knowingly engage providing terrorist weapons4 n lack sustainability disarmament operation shall start unless sustainability funding resource guaranteed previous attempt carry disarmament operation insufficient asset fund resulted unconstructive partial disarmament return armed conflict failure entire ddr process reconfiguring closing un mission another crucial moment planned advance transition often require handing responsibility national authority united nation country team unct important ensure entity mandate capacity complete ddr programme even withdrawal un mission resource", "ProcessedSent": "likely several operational risk depending context including following n threat safety security ddr programme personnel un nonun disarmament phase ddr programme staff likely direct contact armed individual including member armed force group", "SentID": 3886 }, { "ParagraphID": 1251, - "Paragraph": "There are likely to be several operational risks, depending on the context, including the following: \\n Threats to the safety and security of DDR programme personnel (both UN and non-UN): During the disarmament phase of the DDR programme, staff are likely to be in direct contact with armed individuals, including members of both armed forces and groups. Staff should be conscious not only of the risks associated with handling weapons, ammunition and explosives, but also of the risks of unpredictable behaviour as a result of the significant levels of stress that disarmament activities can generate among combatants and other stakeholders. \\n Avoid supporting weapons buy-back: UN supported DDR programmes shall avoid attaching monetary value to weapons as a means of encouraging their surrender by members of armed forces and groups. Weapons buy-back programmes within and outside DDR have proven to be inefficient and even counter-productive as they tend to fuel national and regional arms flows, which in the end can jeopardize the achievement of disarmament objectives in a DDR programme. Buy-back programmes can also have unintended societal consequences such as economically rewarding combatants and exacerbating existing gender inequalities \\n Disarmament of foreign combatants: Disarmament operations may also need to consider armed foreign combatants. Foreign combatants may be disarmed in the host country or at the border of the country of origin to which they will be returning. DDR programmes should plan for disarmament of foreign combatants within or outside repatriation agreements between the country of origin and the host country (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements). \\n Terrorism and violent extremism threats: DDR programmes are increasingly being conducted in contexts affected by terrorism. Disarmament operations in these contexts require the highest security safeguards and robust on-site WAM expertise to maximize the safety of all involved. DDR practitioners should be aware of the requirements imposed on States by UN Security Council resolutions 2370 (2017) and 2482 (2019) and Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum, in terms of, inter alia, ensuring that appropriate legal actions are taken against those who knowingly engage in providing terrorists with weapons.4 \\n Lack of sustainability: Disarmament operations shall not start unless the sustainability of funding and resources is guaranteed. Previous attempts to carry out disarmament operations with insufficient assets and funds have resulted in unconstructive, partial disarmament, a return to armed conflict, and the failure of the entire DDR process. The reconfiguring and closing of UN missions is another crucial moment that should be planned in advance. Such transitions often require handing over responsibility to national authorities or to the United Nations Country Team (UNCT). It is important to ensure these entities have the mandate and capacity to complete the DDR programme even after the withdrawal of UN mission resources.", + "Paragraph": "There are likely to be several operational risks, depending on the context, including the following: \n Threats to the safety and security of DDR programme personnel (both UN and non-UN): During the disarmament phase of the DDR programme, staff are likely to be in direct contact with armed individuals, including members of both armed forces and groups. Staff should be conscious not only of the risks associated with handling weapons, ammunition and explosives, but also of the risks of unpredictable behaviour as a result of the significant levels of stress that disarmament activities can generate among combatants and other stakeholders. \n Avoid supporting weapons buy-back: UN supported DDR programmes shall avoid attaching monetary value to weapons as a means of encouraging their surrender by members of armed forces and groups. Weapons buy-back programmes within and outside DDR have proven to be inefficient and even counter-productive as they tend to fuel national and regional arms flows, which in the end can jeopardize the achievement of disarmament objectives in a DDR programme. Buy-back programmes can also have unintended societal consequences such as economically rewarding combatants and exacerbating existing gender inequalities \n Disarmament of foreign combatants: Disarmament operations may also need to consider armed foreign combatants. Foreign combatants may be disarmed in the host country or at the border of the country of origin to which they will be returning. DDR programmes should plan for disarmament of foreign combatants within or outside repatriation agreements between the country of origin and the host country (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements). \n Terrorism and violent extremism threats: DDR programmes are increasingly being conducted in contexts affected by terrorism. Disarmament operations in these contexts require the highest security safeguards and robust on-site WAM expertise to maximize the safety of all involved. DDR practitioners should be aware of the requirements imposed on States by UN Security Council resolutions 2370 (2017) and 2482 (2019) and Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum, in terms of, inter alia, ensuring that appropriate legal actions are taken against those who knowingly engage in providing terrorists with weapons.4 \n Lack of sustainability: Disarmament operations shall not start unless the sustainability of funding and resources is guaranteed. Previous attempts to carry out disarmament operations with insufficient assets and funds have resulted in unconstructive, partial disarmament, a return to armed conflict, and the failure of the entire DDR process. The reconfiguring and closing of UN missions is another crucial moment that should be planned in advance. Such transitions often require handing over responsibility to national authorities or to the United Nations Country Team (UNCT). It is important to ensure these entities have the mandate and capacity to complete the DDR programme even after the withdrawal of UN mission resources.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -69985,7 +69985,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1251, - "Paragraph": "There are likely to be several operational risks, depending on the context, including the following: \\n Threats to the safety and security of DDR programme personnel (both UN and non-UN): During the disarmament phase of the DDR programme, staff are likely to be in direct contact with armed individuals, including members of both armed forces and groups. Staff should be conscious not only of the risks associated with handling weapons, ammunition and explosives, but also of the risks of unpredictable behaviour as a result of the significant levels of stress that disarmament activities can generate among combatants and other stakeholders. \\n Avoid supporting weapons buy-back: UN supported DDR programmes shall avoid attaching monetary value to weapons as a means of encouraging their surrender by members of armed forces and groups. Weapons buy-back programmes within and outside DDR have proven to be inefficient and even counter-productive as they tend to fuel national and regional arms flows, which in the end can jeopardize the achievement of disarmament objectives in a DDR programme. Buy-back programmes can also have unintended societal consequences such as economically rewarding combatants and exacerbating existing gender inequalities \\n Disarmament of foreign combatants: Disarmament operations may also need to consider armed foreign combatants. Foreign combatants may be disarmed in the host country or at the border of the country of origin to which they will be returning. DDR programmes should plan for disarmament of foreign combatants within or outside repatriation agreements between the country of origin and the host country (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements). \\n Terrorism and violent extremism threats: DDR programmes are increasingly being conducted in contexts affected by terrorism. Disarmament operations in these contexts require the highest security safeguards and robust on-site WAM expertise to maximize the safety of all involved. DDR practitioners should be aware of the requirements imposed on States by UN Security Council resolutions 2370 (2017) and 2482 (2019) and Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum, in terms of, inter alia, ensuring that appropriate legal actions are taken against those who knowingly engage in providing terrorists with weapons.4 \\n Lack of sustainability: Disarmament operations shall not start unless the sustainability of funding and resources is guaranteed. Previous attempts to carry out disarmament operations with insufficient assets and funds have resulted in unconstructive, partial disarmament, a return to armed conflict, and the failure of the entire DDR process. The reconfiguring and closing of UN missions is another crucial moment that should be planned in advance. Such transitions often require handing over responsibility to national authorities or to the United Nations Country Team (UNCT). It is important to ensure these entities have the mandate and capacity to complete the DDR programme even after the withdrawal of UN mission resources.", + "Paragraph": "There are likely to be several operational risks, depending on the context, including the following: \n Threats to the safety and security of DDR programme personnel (both UN and non-UN): During the disarmament phase of the DDR programme, staff are likely to be in direct contact with armed individuals, including members of both armed forces and groups. Staff should be conscious not only of the risks associated with handling weapons, ammunition and explosives, but also of the risks of unpredictable behaviour as a result of the significant levels of stress that disarmament activities can generate among combatants and other stakeholders. \n Avoid supporting weapons buy-back: UN supported DDR programmes shall avoid attaching monetary value to weapons as a means of encouraging their surrender by members of armed forces and groups. Weapons buy-back programmes within and outside DDR have proven to be inefficient and even counter-productive as they tend to fuel national and regional arms flows, which in the end can jeopardize the achievement of disarmament objectives in a DDR programme. Buy-back programmes can also have unintended societal consequences such as economically rewarding combatants and exacerbating existing gender inequalities \n Disarmament of foreign combatants: Disarmament operations may also need to consider armed foreign combatants. Foreign combatants may be disarmed in the host country or at the border of the country of origin to which they will be returning. DDR programmes should plan for disarmament of foreign combatants within or outside repatriation agreements between the country of origin and the host country (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements). \n Terrorism and violent extremism threats: DDR programmes are increasingly being conducted in contexts affected by terrorism. Disarmament operations in these contexts require the highest security safeguards and robust on-site WAM expertise to maximize the safety of all involved. DDR practitioners should be aware of the requirements imposed on States by UN Security Council resolutions 2370 (2017) and 2482 (2019) and Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum, in terms of, inter alia, ensuring that appropriate legal actions are taken against those who knowingly engage in providing terrorists with weapons.4 \n Lack of sustainability: Disarmament operations shall not start unless the sustainability of funding and resources is guaranteed. Previous attempts to carry out disarmament operations with insufficient assets and funds have resulted in unconstructive, partial disarmament, a return to armed conflict, and the failure of the entire DDR process. The reconfiguring and closing of UN missions is another crucial moment that should be planned in advance. Such transitions often require handing over responsibility to national authorities or to the United Nations Country Team (UNCT). It is important to ensure these entities have the mandate and capacity to complete the DDR programme even after the withdrawal of UN mission resources.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -69996,14 +69996,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Risk and security assessment", "Heading3": "5.3.1 Operational risks", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Avoid supporting weapons buy-back: UN supported DDR programmes shall avoid attaching monetary value to weapons as a means of encouraging their surrender by members of armed forces and groups.", + "Sentence": "\n Avoid supporting weapons buy-back: UN supported DDR programmes shall avoid attaching monetary value to weapons as a means of encouraging their surrender by members of armed forces and groups.", "newParagraph": "likely several operational risk depending context including following n threat safety security ddr programme personnel un nonun disarmament phase ddr programme staff likely direct contact armed individual including member armed force group staff conscious risk associated handling weapon ammunition explosive also risk unpredictable behaviour result significant level stress disarmament activity generate among combatant stakeholder n avoid supporting weapon buyback un supported ddr programme shall avoid attaching monetary value weapon mean encouraging surrender member armed force group weapon buyback programme within outside ddr proven inefficient even counterproductive tend fuel national regional arm flow end jeopardize achievement disarmament objective ddr programme buyback programme also unintended societal consequence economically rewarding combatant exacerbating existing gender inequality n disarmament foreign combatant disarmament operation may also need consider armed foreign combatant foreign combatant may disarmed host country border country origin returning ddr programme plan disarmament foreign combatant within outside repatriation agreement country origin host country see iddrs 540 crossborder population movement n terrorism violent extremism threat ddr programme increasingly conducted context affected terrorism disarmament operation context require highest security safeguard robust onsite wam expertise maximize safety involved ddr practitioner aware requirement imposed state un security council resolution 2370 2017 2482 2019 council 2015 madrid guiding principle 2018 addendum term inter alia ensuring appropriate legal action taken knowingly engage providing terrorist weapons4 n lack sustainability disarmament operation shall start unless sustainability funding resource guaranteed previous attempt carry disarmament operation insufficient asset fund resulted unconstructive partial disarmament return armed conflict failure entire ddr process reconfiguring closing un mission another crucial moment planned advance transition often require handing responsibility national authority united nation country team unct important ensure entity mandate capacity complete ddr programme even withdrawal un mission resource", "ProcessedSent": "n avoid supporting weapon buyback un supported ddr programme shall avoid attaching monetary value weapon mean encouraging surrender member armed force group", "SentID": 3888 }, { "ParagraphID": 1251, - "Paragraph": "There are likely to be several operational risks, depending on the context, including the following: \\n Threats to the safety and security of DDR programme personnel (both UN and non-UN): During the disarmament phase of the DDR programme, staff are likely to be in direct contact with armed individuals, including members of both armed forces and groups. Staff should be conscious not only of the risks associated with handling weapons, ammunition and explosives, but also of the risks of unpredictable behaviour as a result of the significant levels of stress that disarmament activities can generate among combatants and other stakeholders. \\n Avoid supporting weapons buy-back: UN supported DDR programmes shall avoid attaching monetary value to weapons as a means of encouraging their surrender by members of armed forces and groups. Weapons buy-back programmes within and outside DDR have proven to be inefficient and even counter-productive as they tend to fuel national and regional arms flows, which in the end can jeopardize the achievement of disarmament objectives in a DDR programme. Buy-back programmes can also have unintended societal consequences such as economically rewarding combatants and exacerbating existing gender inequalities \\n Disarmament of foreign combatants: Disarmament operations may also need to consider armed foreign combatants. Foreign combatants may be disarmed in the host country or at the border of the country of origin to which they will be returning. DDR programmes should plan for disarmament of foreign combatants within or outside repatriation agreements between the country of origin and the host country (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements). \\n Terrorism and violent extremism threats: DDR programmes are increasingly being conducted in contexts affected by terrorism. Disarmament operations in these contexts require the highest security safeguards and robust on-site WAM expertise to maximize the safety of all involved. DDR practitioners should be aware of the requirements imposed on States by UN Security Council resolutions 2370 (2017) and 2482 (2019) and Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum, in terms of, inter alia, ensuring that appropriate legal actions are taken against those who knowingly engage in providing terrorists with weapons.4 \\n Lack of sustainability: Disarmament operations shall not start unless the sustainability of funding and resources is guaranteed. Previous attempts to carry out disarmament operations with insufficient assets and funds have resulted in unconstructive, partial disarmament, a return to armed conflict, and the failure of the entire DDR process. The reconfiguring and closing of UN missions is another crucial moment that should be planned in advance. Such transitions often require handing over responsibility to national authorities or to the United Nations Country Team (UNCT). It is important to ensure these entities have the mandate and capacity to complete the DDR programme even after the withdrawal of UN mission resources.", + "Paragraph": "There are likely to be several operational risks, depending on the context, including the following: \n Threats to the safety and security of DDR programme personnel (both UN and non-UN): During the disarmament phase of the DDR programme, staff are likely to be in direct contact with armed individuals, including members of both armed forces and groups. Staff should be conscious not only of the risks associated with handling weapons, ammunition and explosives, but also of the risks of unpredictable behaviour as a result of the significant levels of stress that disarmament activities can generate among combatants and other stakeholders. \n Avoid supporting weapons buy-back: UN supported DDR programmes shall avoid attaching monetary value to weapons as a means of encouraging their surrender by members of armed forces and groups. Weapons buy-back programmes within and outside DDR have proven to be inefficient and even counter-productive as they tend to fuel national and regional arms flows, which in the end can jeopardize the achievement of disarmament objectives in a DDR programme. Buy-back programmes can also have unintended societal consequences such as economically rewarding combatants and exacerbating existing gender inequalities \n Disarmament of foreign combatants: Disarmament operations may also need to consider armed foreign combatants. Foreign combatants may be disarmed in the host country or at the border of the country of origin to which they will be returning. DDR programmes should plan for disarmament of foreign combatants within or outside repatriation agreements between the country of origin and the host country (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements). \n Terrorism and violent extremism threats: DDR programmes are increasingly being conducted in contexts affected by terrorism. Disarmament operations in these contexts require the highest security safeguards and robust on-site WAM expertise to maximize the safety of all involved. DDR practitioners should be aware of the requirements imposed on States by UN Security Council resolutions 2370 (2017) and 2482 (2019) and Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum, in terms of, inter alia, ensuring that appropriate legal actions are taken against those who knowingly engage in providing terrorists with weapons.4 \n Lack of sustainability: Disarmament operations shall not start unless the sustainability of funding and resources is guaranteed. Previous attempts to carry out disarmament operations with insufficient assets and funds have resulted in unconstructive, partial disarmament, a return to armed conflict, and the failure of the entire DDR process. The reconfiguring and closing of UN missions is another crucial moment that should be planned in advance. Such transitions often require handing over responsibility to national authorities or to the United Nations Country Team (UNCT). It is important to ensure these entities have the mandate and capacity to complete the DDR programme even after the withdrawal of UN mission resources.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -70021,7 +70021,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1251, - "Paragraph": "There are likely to be several operational risks, depending on the context, including the following: \\n Threats to the safety and security of DDR programme personnel (both UN and non-UN): During the disarmament phase of the DDR programme, staff are likely to be in direct contact with armed individuals, including members of both armed forces and groups. Staff should be conscious not only of the risks associated with handling weapons, ammunition and explosives, but also of the risks of unpredictable behaviour as a result of the significant levels of stress that disarmament activities can generate among combatants and other stakeholders. \\n Avoid supporting weapons buy-back: UN supported DDR programmes shall avoid attaching monetary value to weapons as a means of encouraging their surrender by members of armed forces and groups. Weapons buy-back programmes within and outside DDR have proven to be inefficient and even counter-productive as they tend to fuel national and regional arms flows, which in the end can jeopardize the achievement of disarmament objectives in a DDR programme. Buy-back programmes can also have unintended societal consequences such as economically rewarding combatants and exacerbating existing gender inequalities \\n Disarmament of foreign combatants: Disarmament operations may also need to consider armed foreign combatants. Foreign combatants may be disarmed in the host country or at the border of the country of origin to which they will be returning. DDR programmes should plan for disarmament of foreign combatants within or outside repatriation agreements between the country of origin and the host country (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements). \\n Terrorism and violent extremism threats: DDR programmes are increasingly being conducted in contexts affected by terrorism. Disarmament operations in these contexts require the highest security safeguards and robust on-site WAM expertise to maximize the safety of all involved. DDR practitioners should be aware of the requirements imposed on States by UN Security Council resolutions 2370 (2017) and 2482 (2019) and Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum, in terms of, inter alia, ensuring that appropriate legal actions are taken against those who knowingly engage in providing terrorists with weapons.4 \\n Lack of sustainability: Disarmament operations shall not start unless the sustainability of funding and resources is guaranteed. Previous attempts to carry out disarmament operations with insufficient assets and funds have resulted in unconstructive, partial disarmament, a return to armed conflict, and the failure of the entire DDR process. The reconfiguring and closing of UN missions is another crucial moment that should be planned in advance. Such transitions often require handing over responsibility to national authorities or to the United Nations Country Team (UNCT). It is important to ensure these entities have the mandate and capacity to complete the DDR programme even after the withdrawal of UN mission resources.", + "Paragraph": "There are likely to be several operational risks, depending on the context, including the following: \n Threats to the safety and security of DDR programme personnel (both UN and non-UN): During the disarmament phase of the DDR programme, staff are likely to be in direct contact with armed individuals, including members of both armed forces and groups. Staff should be conscious not only of the risks associated with handling weapons, ammunition and explosives, but also of the risks of unpredictable behaviour as a result of the significant levels of stress that disarmament activities can generate among combatants and other stakeholders. \n Avoid supporting weapons buy-back: UN supported DDR programmes shall avoid attaching monetary value to weapons as a means of encouraging their surrender by members of armed forces and groups. Weapons buy-back programmes within and outside DDR have proven to be inefficient and even counter-productive as they tend to fuel national and regional arms flows, which in the end can jeopardize the achievement of disarmament objectives in a DDR programme. Buy-back programmes can also have unintended societal consequences such as economically rewarding combatants and exacerbating existing gender inequalities \n Disarmament of foreign combatants: Disarmament operations may also need to consider armed foreign combatants. Foreign combatants may be disarmed in the host country or at the border of the country of origin to which they will be returning. DDR programmes should plan for disarmament of foreign combatants within or outside repatriation agreements between the country of origin and the host country (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements). \n Terrorism and violent extremism threats: DDR programmes are increasingly being conducted in contexts affected by terrorism. Disarmament operations in these contexts require the highest security safeguards and robust on-site WAM expertise to maximize the safety of all involved. DDR practitioners should be aware of the requirements imposed on States by UN Security Council resolutions 2370 (2017) and 2482 (2019) and Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum, in terms of, inter alia, ensuring that appropriate legal actions are taken against those who knowingly engage in providing terrorists with weapons.4 \n Lack of sustainability: Disarmament operations shall not start unless the sustainability of funding and resources is guaranteed. Previous attempts to carry out disarmament operations with insufficient assets and funds have resulted in unconstructive, partial disarmament, a return to armed conflict, and the failure of the entire DDR process. The reconfiguring and closing of UN missions is another crucial moment that should be planned in advance. Such transitions often require handing over responsibility to national authorities or to the United Nations Country Team (UNCT). It is important to ensure these entities have the mandate and capacity to complete the DDR programme even after the withdrawal of UN mission resources.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -70032,14 +70032,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Risk and security assessment", "Heading3": "5.3.1 Operational risks", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Buy-back programmes can also have unintended societal consequences such as economically rewarding combatants and exacerbating existing gender inequalities \\n Disarmament of foreign combatants: Disarmament operations may also need to consider armed foreign combatants.", + "Sentence": "Buy-back programmes can also have unintended societal consequences such as economically rewarding combatants and exacerbating existing gender inequalities \n Disarmament of foreign combatants: Disarmament operations may also need to consider armed foreign combatants.", "newParagraph": "likely several operational risk depending context including following n threat safety security ddr programme personnel un nonun disarmament phase ddr programme staff likely direct contact armed individual including member armed force group staff conscious risk associated handling weapon ammunition explosive also risk unpredictable behaviour result significant level stress disarmament activity generate among combatant stakeholder n avoid supporting weapon buyback un supported ddr programme shall avoid attaching monetary value weapon mean encouraging surrender member armed force group weapon buyback programme within outside ddr proven inefficient even counterproductive tend fuel national regional arm flow end jeopardize achievement disarmament objective ddr programme buyback programme also unintended societal consequence economically rewarding combatant exacerbating existing gender inequality n disarmament foreign combatant disarmament operation may also need consider armed foreign combatant foreign combatant may disarmed host country border country origin returning ddr programme plan disarmament foreign combatant within outside repatriation agreement country origin host country see iddrs 540 crossborder population movement n terrorism violent extremism threat ddr programme increasingly conducted context affected terrorism disarmament operation context require highest security safeguard robust onsite wam expertise maximize safety involved ddr practitioner aware requirement imposed state un security council resolution 2370 2017 2482 2019 council 2015 madrid guiding principle 2018 addendum term inter alia ensuring appropriate legal action taken knowingly engage providing terrorist weapons4 n lack sustainability disarmament operation shall start unless sustainability funding resource guaranteed previous attempt carry disarmament operation insufficient asset fund resulted unconstructive partial disarmament return armed conflict failure entire ddr process reconfiguring closing un mission another crucial moment planned advance transition often require handing responsibility national authority united nation country team unct important ensure entity mandate capacity complete ddr programme even withdrawal un mission resource", "ProcessedSent": "buyback programme also unintended societal consequence economically rewarding combatant exacerbating existing gender inequality n disarmament foreign combatant disarmament operation may also need consider armed foreign combatant", "SentID": 3890 }, { "ParagraphID": 1251, - "Paragraph": "There are likely to be several operational risks, depending on the context, including the following: \\n Threats to the safety and security of DDR programme personnel (both UN and non-UN): During the disarmament phase of the DDR programme, staff are likely to be in direct contact with armed individuals, including members of both armed forces and groups. Staff should be conscious not only of the risks associated with handling weapons, ammunition and explosives, but also of the risks of unpredictable behaviour as a result of the significant levels of stress that disarmament activities can generate among combatants and other stakeholders. \\n Avoid supporting weapons buy-back: UN supported DDR programmes shall avoid attaching monetary value to weapons as a means of encouraging their surrender by members of armed forces and groups. Weapons buy-back programmes within and outside DDR have proven to be inefficient and even counter-productive as they tend to fuel national and regional arms flows, which in the end can jeopardize the achievement of disarmament objectives in a DDR programme. Buy-back programmes can also have unintended societal consequences such as economically rewarding combatants and exacerbating existing gender inequalities \\n Disarmament of foreign combatants: Disarmament operations may also need to consider armed foreign combatants. Foreign combatants may be disarmed in the host country or at the border of the country of origin to which they will be returning. DDR programmes should plan for disarmament of foreign combatants within or outside repatriation agreements between the country of origin and the host country (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements). \\n Terrorism and violent extremism threats: DDR programmes are increasingly being conducted in contexts affected by terrorism. Disarmament operations in these contexts require the highest security safeguards and robust on-site WAM expertise to maximize the safety of all involved. DDR practitioners should be aware of the requirements imposed on States by UN Security Council resolutions 2370 (2017) and 2482 (2019) and Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum, in terms of, inter alia, ensuring that appropriate legal actions are taken against those who knowingly engage in providing terrorists with weapons.4 \\n Lack of sustainability: Disarmament operations shall not start unless the sustainability of funding and resources is guaranteed. Previous attempts to carry out disarmament operations with insufficient assets and funds have resulted in unconstructive, partial disarmament, a return to armed conflict, and the failure of the entire DDR process. The reconfiguring and closing of UN missions is another crucial moment that should be planned in advance. Such transitions often require handing over responsibility to national authorities or to the United Nations Country Team (UNCT). It is important to ensure these entities have the mandate and capacity to complete the DDR programme even after the withdrawal of UN mission resources.", + "Paragraph": "There are likely to be several operational risks, depending on the context, including the following: \n Threats to the safety and security of DDR programme personnel (both UN and non-UN): During the disarmament phase of the DDR programme, staff are likely to be in direct contact with armed individuals, including members of both armed forces and groups. Staff should be conscious not only of the risks associated with handling weapons, ammunition and explosives, but also of the risks of unpredictable behaviour as a result of the significant levels of stress that disarmament activities can generate among combatants and other stakeholders. \n Avoid supporting weapons buy-back: UN supported DDR programmes shall avoid attaching monetary value to weapons as a means of encouraging their surrender by members of armed forces and groups. Weapons buy-back programmes within and outside DDR have proven to be inefficient and even counter-productive as they tend to fuel national and regional arms flows, which in the end can jeopardize the achievement of disarmament objectives in a DDR programme. Buy-back programmes can also have unintended societal consequences such as economically rewarding combatants and exacerbating existing gender inequalities \n Disarmament of foreign combatants: Disarmament operations may also need to consider armed foreign combatants. Foreign combatants may be disarmed in the host country or at the border of the country of origin to which they will be returning. DDR programmes should plan for disarmament of foreign combatants within or outside repatriation agreements between the country of origin and the host country (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements). \n Terrorism and violent extremism threats: DDR programmes are increasingly being conducted in contexts affected by terrorism. Disarmament operations in these contexts require the highest security safeguards and robust on-site WAM expertise to maximize the safety of all involved. DDR practitioners should be aware of the requirements imposed on States by UN Security Council resolutions 2370 (2017) and 2482 (2019) and Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum, in terms of, inter alia, ensuring that appropriate legal actions are taken against those who knowingly engage in providing terrorists with weapons.4 \n Lack of sustainability: Disarmament operations shall not start unless the sustainability of funding and resources is guaranteed. Previous attempts to carry out disarmament operations with insufficient assets and funds have resulted in unconstructive, partial disarmament, a return to armed conflict, and the failure of the entire DDR process. The reconfiguring and closing of UN missions is another crucial moment that should be planned in advance. Such transitions often require handing over responsibility to national authorities or to the United Nations Country Team (UNCT). It is important to ensure these entities have the mandate and capacity to complete the DDR programme even after the withdrawal of UN mission resources.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -70057,7 +70057,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1251, - "Paragraph": "There are likely to be several operational risks, depending on the context, including the following: \\n Threats to the safety and security of DDR programme personnel (both UN and non-UN): During the disarmament phase of the DDR programme, staff are likely to be in direct contact with armed individuals, including members of both armed forces and groups. Staff should be conscious not only of the risks associated with handling weapons, ammunition and explosives, but also of the risks of unpredictable behaviour as a result of the significant levels of stress that disarmament activities can generate among combatants and other stakeholders. \\n Avoid supporting weapons buy-back: UN supported DDR programmes shall avoid attaching monetary value to weapons as a means of encouraging their surrender by members of armed forces and groups. Weapons buy-back programmes within and outside DDR have proven to be inefficient and even counter-productive as they tend to fuel national and regional arms flows, which in the end can jeopardize the achievement of disarmament objectives in a DDR programme. Buy-back programmes can also have unintended societal consequences such as economically rewarding combatants and exacerbating existing gender inequalities \\n Disarmament of foreign combatants: Disarmament operations may also need to consider armed foreign combatants. Foreign combatants may be disarmed in the host country or at the border of the country of origin to which they will be returning. DDR programmes should plan for disarmament of foreign combatants within or outside repatriation agreements between the country of origin and the host country (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements). \\n Terrorism and violent extremism threats: DDR programmes are increasingly being conducted in contexts affected by terrorism. Disarmament operations in these contexts require the highest security safeguards and robust on-site WAM expertise to maximize the safety of all involved. DDR practitioners should be aware of the requirements imposed on States by UN Security Council resolutions 2370 (2017) and 2482 (2019) and Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum, in terms of, inter alia, ensuring that appropriate legal actions are taken against those who knowingly engage in providing terrorists with weapons.4 \\n Lack of sustainability: Disarmament operations shall not start unless the sustainability of funding and resources is guaranteed. Previous attempts to carry out disarmament operations with insufficient assets and funds have resulted in unconstructive, partial disarmament, a return to armed conflict, and the failure of the entire DDR process. The reconfiguring and closing of UN missions is another crucial moment that should be planned in advance. Such transitions often require handing over responsibility to national authorities or to the United Nations Country Team (UNCT). It is important to ensure these entities have the mandate and capacity to complete the DDR programme even after the withdrawal of UN mission resources.", + "Paragraph": "There are likely to be several operational risks, depending on the context, including the following: \n Threats to the safety and security of DDR programme personnel (both UN and non-UN): During the disarmament phase of the DDR programme, staff are likely to be in direct contact with armed individuals, including members of both armed forces and groups. Staff should be conscious not only of the risks associated with handling weapons, ammunition and explosives, but also of the risks of unpredictable behaviour as a result of the significant levels of stress that disarmament activities can generate among combatants and other stakeholders. \n Avoid supporting weapons buy-back: UN supported DDR programmes shall avoid attaching monetary value to weapons as a means of encouraging their surrender by members of armed forces and groups. Weapons buy-back programmes within and outside DDR have proven to be inefficient and even counter-productive as they tend to fuel national and regional arms flows, which in the end can jeopardize the achievement of disarmament objectives in a DDR programme. Buy-back programmes can also have unintended societal consequences such as economically rewarding combatants and exacerbating existing gender inequalities \n Disarmament of foreign combatants: Disarmament operations may also need to consider armed foreign combatants. Foreign combatants may be disarmed in the host country or at the border of the country of origin to which they will be returning. DDR programmes should plan for disarmament of foreign combatants within or outside repatriation agreements between the country of origin and the host country (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements). \n Terrorism and violent extremism threats: DDR programmes are increasingly being conducted in contexts affected by terrorism. Disarmament operations in these contexts require the highest security safeguards and robust on-site WAM expertise to maximize the safety of all involved. DDR practitioners should be aware of the requirements imposed on States by UN Security Council resolutions 2370 (2017) and 2482 (2019) and Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum, in terms of, inter alia, ensuring that appropriate legal actions are taken against those who knowingly engage in providing terrorists with weapons.4 \n Lack of sustainability: Disarmament operations shall not start unless the sustainability of funding and resources is guaranteed. Previous attempts to carry out disarmament operations with insufficient assets and funds have resulted in unconstructive, partial disarmament, a return to armed conflict, and the failure of the entire DDR process. The reconfiguring and closing of UN missions is another crucial moment that should be planned in advance. Such transitions often require handing over responsibility to national authorities or to the United Nations Country Team (UNCT). It is important to ensure these entities have the mandate and capacity to complete the DDR programme even after the withdrawal of UN mission resources.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -70075,7 +70075,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1251, - "Paragraph": "There are likely to be several operational risks, depending on the context, including the following: \\n Threats to the safety and security of DDR programme personnel (both UN and non-UN): During the disarmament phase of the DDR programme, staff are likely to be in direct contact with armed individuals, including members of both armed forces and groups. Staff should be conscious not only of the risks associated with handling weapons, ammunition and explosives, but also of the risks of unpredictable behaviour as a result of the significant levels of stress that disarmament activities can generate among combatants and other stakeholders. \\n Avoid supporting weapons buy-back: UN supported DDR programmes shall avoid attaching monetary value to weapons as a means of encouraging their surrender by members of armed forces and groups. Weapons buy-back programmes within and outside DDR have proven to be inefficient and even counter-productive as they tend to fuel national and regional arms flows, which in the end can jeopardize the achievement of disarmament objectives in a DDR programme. Buy-back programmes can also have unintended societal consequences such as economically rewarding combatants and exacerbating existing gender inequalities \\n Disarmament of foreign combatants: Disarmament operations may also need to consider armed foreign combatants. Foreign combatants may be disarmed in the host country or at the border of the country of origin to which they will be returning. DDR programmes should plan for disarmament of foreign combatants within or outside repatriation agreements between the country of origin and the host country (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements). \\n Terrorism and violent extremism threats: DDR programmes are increasingly being conducted in contexts affected by terrorism. Disarmament operations in these contexts require the highest security safeguards and robust on-site WAM expertise to maximize the safety of all involved. DDR practitioners should be aware of the requirements imposed on States by UN Security Council resolutions 2370 (2017) and 2482 (2019) and Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum, in terms of, inter alia, ensuring that appropriate legal actions are taken against those who knowingly engage in providing terrorists with weapons.4 \\n Lack of sustainability: Disarmament operations shall not start unless the sustainability of funding and resources is guaranteed. Previous attempts to carry out disarmament operations with insufficient assets and funds have resulted in unconstructive, partial disarmament, a return to armed conflict, and the failure of the entire DDR process. The reconfiguring and closing of UN missions is another crucial moment that should be planned in advance. Such transitions often require handing over responsibility to national authorities or to the United Nations Country Team (UNCT). It is important to ensure these entities have the mandate and capacity to complete the DDR programme even after the withdrawal of UN mission resources.", + "Paragraph": "There are likely to be several operational risks, depending on the context, including the following: \n Threats to the safety and security of DDR programme personnel (both UN and non-UN): During the disarmament phase of the DDR programme, staff are likely to be in direct contact with armed individuals, including members of both armed forces and groups. Staff should be conscious not only of the risks associated with handling weapons, ammunition and explosives, but also of the risks of unpredictable behaviour as a result of the significant levels of stress that disarmament activities can generate among combatants and other stakeholders. \n Avoid supporting weapons buy-back: UN supported DDR programmes shall avoid attaching monetary value to weapons as a means of encouraging their surrender by members of armed forces and groups. Weapons buy-back programmes within and outside DDR have proven to be inefficient and even counter-productive as they tend to fuel national and regional arms flows, which in the end can jeopardize the achievement of disarmament objectives in a DDR programme. Buy-back programmes can also have unintended societal consequences such as economically rewarding combatants and exacerbating existing gender inequalities \n Disarmament of foreign combatants: Disarmament operations may also need to consider armed foreign combatants. Foreign combatants may be disarmed in the host country or at the border of the country of origin to which they will be returning. DDR programmes should plan for disarmament of foreign combatants within or outside repatriation agreements between the country of origin and the host country (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements). \n Terrorism and violent extremism threats: DDR programmes are increasingly being conducted in contexts affected by terrorism. Disarmament operations in these contexts require the highest security safeguards and robust on-site WAM expertise to maximize the safety of all involved. DDR practitioners should be aware of the requirements imposed on States by UN Security Council resolutions 2370 (2017) and 2482 (2019) and Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum, in terms of, inter alia, ensuring that appropriate legal actions are taken against those who knowingly engage in providing terrorists with weapons.4 \n Lack of sustainability: Disarmament operations shall not start unless the sustainability of funding and resources is guaranteed. Previous attempts to carry out disarmament operations with insufficient assets and funds have resulted in unconstructive, partial disarmament, a return to armed conflict, and the failure of the entire DDR process. The reconfiguring and closing of UN missions is another crucial moment that should be planned in advance. Such transitions often require handing over responsibility to national authorities or to the United Nations Country Team (UNCT). It is important to ensure these entities have the mandate and capacity to complete the DDR programme even after the withdrawal of UN mission resources.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -70086,14 +70086,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Risk and security assessment", "Heading3": "5.3.1 Operational risks", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Terrorism and violent extremism threats: DDR programmes are increasingly being conducted in contexts affected by terrorism.", + "Sentence": "\n Terrorism and violent extremism threats: DDR programmes are increasingly being conducted in contexts affected by terrorism.", "newParagraph": "likely several operational risk depending context including following n threat safety security ddr programme personnel un nonun disarmament phase ddr programme staff likely direct contact armed individual including member armed force group staff conscious risk associated handling weapon ammunition explosive also risk unpredictable behaviour result significant level stress disarmament activity generate among combatant stakeholder n avoid supporting weapon buyback un supported ddr programme shall avoid attaching monetary value weapon mean encouraging surrender member armed force group weapon buyback programme within outside ddr proven inefficient even counterproductive tend fuel national regional arm flow end jeopardize achievement disarmament objective ddr programme buyback programme also unintended societal consequence economically rewarding combatant exacerbating existing gender inequality n disarmament foreign combatant disarmament operation may also need consider armed foreign combatant foreign combatant may disarmed host country border country origin returning ddr programme plan disarmament foreign combatant within outside repatriation agreement country origin host country see iddrs 540 crossborder population movement n terrorism violent extremism threat ddr programme increasingly conducted context affected terrorism disarmament operation context require highest security safeguard robust onsite wam expertise maximize safety involved ddr practitioner aware requirement imposed state un security council resolution 2370 2017 2482 2019 council 2015 madrid guiding principle 2018 addendum term inter alia ensuring appropriate legal action taken knowingly engage providing terrorist weapons4 n lack sustainability disarmament operation shall start unless sustainability funding resource guaranteed previous attempt carry disarmament operation insufficient asset fund resulted unconstructive partial disarmament return armed conflict failure entire ddr process reconfiguring closing un mission another crucial moment planned advance transition often require handing responsibility national authority united nation country team unct important ensure entity mandate capacity complete ddr programme even withdrawal un mission resource", "ProcessedSent": "n terrorism violent extremism threat ddr programme increasingly conducted context affected terrorism", "SentID": 3893 }, { "ParagraphID": 1251, - "Paragraph": "There are likely to be several operational risks, depending on the context, including the following: \\n Threats to the safety and security of DDR programme personnel (both UN and non-UN): During the disarmament phase of the DDR programme, staff are likely to be in direct contact with armed individuals, including members of both armed forces and groups. Staff should be conscious not only of the risks associated with handling weapons, ammunition and explosives, but also of the risks of unpredictable behaviour as a result of the significant levels of stress that disarmament activities can generate among combatants and other stakeholders. \\n Avoid supporting weapons buy-back: UN supported DDR programmes shall avoid attaching monetary value to weapons as a means of encouraging their surrender by members of armed forces and groups. Weapons buy-back programmes within and outside DDR have proven to be inefficient and even counter-productive as they tend to fuel national and regional arms flows, which in the end can jeopardize the achievement of disarmament objectives in a DDR programme. Buy-back programmes can also have unintended societal consequences such as economically rewarding combatants and exacerbating existing gender inequalities \\n Disarmament of foreign combatants: Disarmament operations may also need to consider armed foreign combatants. Foreign combatants may be disarmed in the host country or at the border of the country of origin to which they will be returning. DDR programmes should plan for disarmament of foreign combatants within or outside repatriation agreements between the country of origin and the host country (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements). \\n Terrorism and violent extremism threats: DDR programmes are increasingly being conducted in contexts affected by terrorism. Disarmament operations in these contexts require the highest security safeguards and robust on-site WAM expertise to maximize the safety of all involved. DDR practitioners should be aware of the requirements imposed on States by UN Security Council resolutions 2370 (2017) and 2482 (2019) and Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum, in terms of, inter alia, ensuring that appropriate legal actions are taken against those who knowingly engage in providing terrorists with weapons.4 \\n Lack of sustainability: Disarmament operations shall not start unless the sustainability of funding and resources is guaranteed. Previous attempts to carry out disarmament operations with insufficient assets and funds have resulted in unconstructive, partial disarmament, a return to armed conflict, and the failure of the entire DDR process. The reconfiguring and closing of UN missions is another crucial moment that should be planned in advance. Such transitions often require handing over responsibility to national authorities or to the United Nations Country Team (UNCT). It is important to ensure these entities have the mandate and capacity to complete the DDR programme even after the withdrawal of UN mission resources.", + "Paragraph": "There are likely to be several operational risks, depending on the context, including the following: \n Threats to the safety and security of DDR programme personnel (both UN and non-UN): During the disarmament phase of the DDR programme, staff are likely to be in direct contact with armed individuals, including members of both armed forces and groups. Staff should be conscious not only of the risks associated with handling weapons, ammunition and explosives, but also of the risks of unpredictable behaviour as a result of the significant levels of stress that disarmament activities can generate among combatants and other stakeholders. \n Avoid supporting weapons buy-back: UN supported DDR programmes shall avoid attaching monetary value to weapons as a means of encouraging their surrender by members of armed forces and groups. Weapons buy-back programmes within and outside DDR have proven to be inefficient and even counter-productive as they tend to fuel national and regional arms flows, which in the end can jeopardize the achievement of disarmament objectives in a DDR programme. Buy-back programmes can also have unintended societal consequences such as economically rewarding combatants and exacerbating existing gender inequalities \n Disarmament of foreign combatants: Disarmament operations may also need to consider armed foreign combatants. Foreign combatants may be disarmed in the host country or at the border of the country of origin to which they will be returning. DDR programmes should plan for disarmament of foreign combatants within or outside repatriation agreements between the country of origin and the host country (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements). \n Terrorism and violent extremism threats: DDR programmes are increasingly being conducted in contexts affected by terrorism. Disarmament operations in these contexts require the highest security safeguards and robust on-site WAM expertise to maximize the safety of all involved. DDR practitioners should be aware of the requirements imposed on States by UN Security Council resolutions 2370 (2017) and 2482 (2019) and Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum, in terms of, inter alia, ensuring that appropriate legal actions are taken against those who knowingly engage in providing terrorists with weapons.4 \n Lack of sustainability: Disarmament operations shall not start unless the sustainability of funding and resources is guaranteed. Previous attempts to carry out disarmament operations with insufficient assets and funds have resulted in unconstructive, partial disarmament, a return to armed conflict, and the failure of the entire DDR process. The reconfiguring and closing of UN missions is another crucial moment that should be planned in advance. Such transitions often require handing over responsibility to national authorities or to the United Nations Country Team (UNCT). It is important to ensure these entities have the mandate and capacity to complete the DDR programme even after the withdrawal of UN mission resources.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -70111,7 +70111,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1251, - "Paragraph": "There are likely to be several operational risks, depending on the context, including the following: \\n Threats to the safety and security of DDR programme personnel (both UN and non-UN): During the disarmament phase of the DDR programme, staff are likely to be in direct contact with armed individuals, including members of both armed forces and groups. Staff should be conscious not only of the risks associated with handling weapons, ammunition and explosives, but also of the risks of unpredictable behaviour as a result of the significant levels of stress that disarmament activities can generate among combatants and other stakeholders. \\n Avoid supporting weapons buy-back: UN supported DDR programmes shall avoid attaching monetary value to weapons as a means of encouraging their surrender by members of armed forces and groups. Weapons buy-back programmes within and outside DDR have proven to be inefficient and even counter-productive as they tend to fuel national and regional arms flows, which in the end can jeopardize the achievement of disarmament objectives in a DDR programme. Buy-back programmes can also have unintended societal consequences such as economically rewarding combatants and exacerbating existing gender inequalities \\n Disarmament of foreign combatants: Disarmament operations may also need to consider armed foreign combatants. Foreign combatants may be disarmed in the host country or at the border of the country of origin to which they will be returning. DDR programmes should plan for disarmament of foreign combatants within or outside repatriation agreements between the country of origin and the host country (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements). \\n Terrorism and violent extremism threats: DDR programmes are increasingly being conducted in contexts affected by terrorism. Disarmament operations in these contexts require the highest security safeguards and robust on-site WAM expertise to maximize the safety of all involved. DDR practitioners should be aware of the requirements imposed on States by UN Security Council resolutions 2370 (2017) and 2482 (2019) and Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum, in terms of, inter alia, ensuring that appropriate legal actions are taken against those who knowingly engage in providing terrorists with weapons.4 \\n Lack of sustainability: Disarmament operations shall not start unless the sustainability of funding and resources is guaranteed. Previous attempts to carry out disarmament operations with insufficient assets and funds have resulted in unconstructive, partial disarmament, a return to armed conflict, and the failure of the entire DDR process. The reconfiguring and closing of UN missions is another crucial moment that should be planned in advance. Such transitions often require handing over responsibility to national authorities or to the United Nations Country Team (UNCT). It is important to ensure these entities have the mandate and capacity to complete the DDR programme even after the withdrawal of UN mission resources.", + "Paragraph": "There are likely to be several operational risks, depending on the context, including the following: \n Threats to the safety and security of DDR programme personnel (both UN and non-UN): During the disarmament phase of the DDR programme, staff are likely to be in direct contact with armed individuals, including members of both armed forces and groups. Staff should be conscious not only of the risks associated with handling weapons, ammunition and explosives, but also of the risks of unpredictable behaviour as a result of the significant levels of stress that disarmament activities can generate among combatants and other stakeholders. \n Avoid supporting weapons buy-back: UN supported DDR programmes shall avoid attaching monetary value to weapons as a means of encouraging their surrender by members of armed forces and groups. Weapons buy-back programmes within and outside DDR have proven to be inefficient and even counter-productive as they tend to fuel national and regional arms flows, which in the end can jeopardize the achievement of disarmament objectives in a DDR programme. Buy-back programmes can also have unintended societal consequences such as economically rewarding combatants and exacerbating existing gender inequalities \n Disarmament of foreign combatants: Disarmament operations may also need to consider armed foreign combatants. Foreign combatants may be disarmed in the host country or at the border of the country of origin to which they will be returning. DDR programmes should plan for disarmament of foreign combatants within or outside repatriation agreements between the country of origin and the host country (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements). \n Terrorism and violent extremism threats: DDR programmes are increasingly being conducted in contexts affected by terrorism. Disarmament operations in these contexts require the highest security safeguards and robust on-site WAM expertise to maximize the safety of all involved. DDR practitioners should be aware of the requirements imposed on States by UN Security Council resolutions 2370 (2017) and 2482 (2019) and Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum, in terms of, inter alia, ensuring that appropriate legal actions are taken against those who knowingly engage in providing terrorists with weapons.4 \n Lack of sustainability: Disarmament operations shall not start unless the sustainability of funding and resources is guaranteed. Previous attempts to carry out disarmament operations with insufficient assets and funds have resulted in unconstructive, partial disarmament, a return to armed conflict, and the failure of the entire DDR process. The reconfiguring and closing of UN missions is another crucial moment that should be planned in advance. Such transitions often require handing over responsibility to national authorities or to the United Nations Country Team (UNCT). It is important to ensure these entities have the mandate and capacity to complete the DDR programme even after the withdrawal of UN mission resources.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -70122,14 +70122,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Risk and security assessment", "Heading3": "5.3.1 Operational risks", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "DDR practitioners should be aware of the requirements imposed on States by UN Security Council resolutions 2370 (2017) and 2482 (2019) and Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum, in terms of, inter alia, ensuring that appropriate legal actions are taken against those who knowingly engage in providing terrorists with weapons.4 \\n Lack of sustainability: Disarmament operations shall not start unless the sustainability of funding and resources is guaranteed.", + "Sentence": "DDR practitioners should be aware of the requirements imposed on States by UN Security Council resolutions 2370 (2017) and 2482 (2019) and Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum, in terms of, inter alia, ensuring that appropriate legal actions are taken against those who knowingly engage in providing terrorists with weapons.4 \n Lack of sustainability: Disarmament operations shall not start unless the sustainability of funding and resources is guaranteed.", "newParagraph": "likely several operational risk depending context including following n threat safety security ddr programme personnel un nonun disarmament phase ddr programme staff likely direct contact armed individual including member armed force group staff conscious risk associated handling weapon ammunition explosive also risk unpredictable behaviour result significant level stress disarmament activity generate among combatant stakeholder n avoid supporting weapon buyback un supported ddr programme shall avoid attaching monetary value weapon mean encouraging surrender member armed force group weapon buyback programme within outside ddr proven inefficient even counterproductive tend fuel national regional arm flow end jeopardize achievement disarmament objective ddr programme buyback programme also unintended societal consequence economically rewarding combatant exacerbating existing gender inequality n disarmament foreign combatant disarmament operation may also need consider armed foreign combatant foreign combatant may disarmed host country border country origin returning ddr programme plan disarmament foreign combatant within outside repatriation agreement country origin host country see iddrs 540 crossborder population movement n terrorism violent extremism threat ddr programme increasingly conducted context affected terrorism disarmament operation context require highest security safeguard robust onsite wam expertise maximize safety involved ddr practitioner aware requirement imposed state un security council resolution 2370 2017 2482 2019 council 2015 madrid guiding principle 2018 addendum term inter alia ensuring appropriate legal action taken knowingly engage providing terrorist weapons4 n lack sustainability disarmament operation shall start unless sustainability funding resource guaranteed previous attempt carry disarmament operation insufficient asset fund resulted unconstructive partial disarmament return armed conflict failure entire ddr process reconfiguring closing un mission another crucial moment planned advance transition often require handing responsibility national authority united nation country team unct important ensure entity mandate capacity complete ddr programme even withdrawal un mission resource", "ProcessedSent": "ddr practitioner aware requirement imposed state un security council resolution 2370 2017 2482 2019 council 2015 madrid guiding principle 2018 addendum term inter alia ensuring appropriate legal action taken knowingly engage providing terrorist weapons4 n lack sustainability disarmament operation shall start unless sustainability funding resource guaranteed", "SentID": 3895 }, { "ParagraphID": 1251, - "Paragraph": "There are likely to be several operational risks, depending on the context, including the following: \\n Threats to the safety and security of DDR programme personnel (both UN and non-UN): During the disarmament phase of the DDR programme, staff are likely to be in direct contact with armed individuals, including members of both armed forces and groups. Staff should be conscious not only of the risks associated with handling weapons, ammunition and explosives, but also of the risks of unpredictable behaviour as a result of the significant levels of stress that disarmament activities can generate among combatants and other stakeholders. \\n Avoid supporting weapons buy-back: UN supported DDR programmes shall avoid attaching monetary value to weapons as a means of encouraging their surrender by members of armed forces and groups. Weapons buy-back programmes within and outside DDR have proven to be inefficient and even counter-productive as they tend to fuel national and regional arms flows, which in the end can jeopardize the achievement of disarmament objectives in a DDR programme. Buy-back programmes can also have unintended societal consequences such as economically rewarding combatants and exacerbating existing gender inequalities \\n Disarmament of foreign combatants: Disarmament operations may also need to consider armed foreign combatants. Foreign combatants may be disarmed in the host country or at the border of the country of origin to which they will be returning. DDR programmes should plan for disarmament of foreign combatants within or outside repatriation agreements between the country of origin and the host country (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements). \\n Terrorism and violent extremism threats: DDR programmes are increasingly being conducted in contexts affected by terrorism. Disarmament operations in these contexts require the highest security safeguards and robust on-site WAM expertise to maximize the safety of all involved. DDR practitioners should be aware of the requirements imposed on States by UN Security Council resolutions 2370 (2017) and 2482 (2019) and Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum, in terms of, inter alia, ensuring that appropriate legal actions are taken against those who knowingly engage in providing terrorists with weapons.4 \\n Lack of sustainability: Disarmament operations shall not start unless the sustainability of funding and resources is guaranteed. Previous attempts to carry out disarmament operations with insufficient assets and funds have resulted in unconstructive, partial disarmament, a return to armed conflict, and the failure of the entire DDR process. The reconfiguring and closing of UN missions is another crucial moment that should be planned in advance. Such transitions often require handing over responsibility to national authorities or to the United Nations Country Team (UNCT). It is important to ensure these entities have the mandate and capacity to complete the DDR programme even after the withdrawal of UN mission resources.", + "Paragraph": "There are likely to be several operational risks, depending on the context, including the following: \n Threats to the safety and security of DDR programme personnel (both UN and non-UN): During the disarmament phase of the DDR programme, staff are likely to be in direct contact with armed individuals, including members of both armed forces and groups. Staff should be conscious not only of the risks associated with handling weapons, ammunition and explosives, but also of the risks of unpredictable behaviour as a result of the significant levels of stress that disarmament activities can generate among combatants and other stakeholders. \n Avoid supporting weapons buy-back: UN supported DDR programmes shall avoid attaching monetary value to weapons as a means of encouraging their surrender by members of armed forces and groups. Weapons buy-back programmes within and outside DDR have proven to be inefficient and even counter-productive as they tend to fuel national and regional arms flows, which in the end can jeopardize the achievement of disarmament objectives in a DDR programme. Buy-back programmes can also have unintended societal consequences such as economically rewarding combatants and exacerbating existing gender inequalities \n Disarmament of foreign combatants: Disarmament operations may also need to consider armed foreign combatants. Foreign combatants may be disarmed in the host country or at the border of the country of origin to which they will be returning. DDR programmes should plan for disarmament of foreign combatants within or outside repatriation agreements between the country of origin and the host country (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements). \n Terrorism and violent extremism threats: DDR programmes are increasingly being conducted in contexts affected by terrorism. Disarmament operations in these contexts require the highest security safeguards and robust on-site WAM expertise to maximize the safety of all involved. DDR practitioners should be aware of the requirements imposed on States by UN Security Council resolutions 2370 (2017) and 2482 (2019) and Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum, in terms of, inter alia, ensuring that appropriate legal actions are taken against those who knowingly engage in providing terrorists with weapons.4 \n Lack of sustainability: Disarmament operations shall not start unless the sustainability of funding and resources is guaranteed. Previous attempts to carry out disarmament operations with insufficient assets and funds have resulted in unconstructive, partial disarmament, a return to armed conflict, and the failure of the entire DDR process. The reconfiguring and closing of UN missions is another crucial moment that should be planned in advance. Such transitions often require handing over responsibility to national authorities or to the United Nations Country Team (UNCT). It is important to ensure these entities have the mandate and capacity to complete the DDR programme even after the withdrawal of UN mission resources.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -70147,7 +70147,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1251, - "Paragraph": "There are likely to be several operational risks, depending on the context, including the following: \\n Threats to the safety and security of DDR programme personnel (both UN and non-UN): During the disarmament phase of the DDR programme, staff are likely to be in direct contact with armed individuals, including members of both armed forces and groups. Staff should be conscious not only of the risks associated with handling weapons, ammunition and explosives, but also of the risks of unpredictable behaviour as a result of the significant levels of stress that disarmament activities can generate among combatants and other stakeholders. \\n Avoid supporting weapons buy-back: UN supported DDR programmes shall avoid attaching monetary value to weapons as a means of encouraging their surrender by members of armed forces and groups. Weapons buy-back programmes within and outside DDR have proven to be inefficient and even counter-productive as they tend to fuel national and regional arms flows, which in the end can jeopardize the achievement of disarmament objectives in a DDR programme. Buy-back programmes can also have unintended societal consequences such as economically rewarding combatants and exacerbating existing gender inequalities \\n Disarmament of foreign combatants: Disarmament operations may also need to consider armed foreign combatants. Foreign combatants may be disarmed in the host country or at the border of the country of origin to which they will be returning. DDR programmes should plan for disarmament of foreign combatants within or outside repatriation agreements between the country of origin and the host country (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements). \\n Terrorism and violent extremism threats: DDR programmes are increasingly being conducted in contexts affected by terrorism. Disarmament operations in these contexts require the highest security safeguards and robust on-site WAM expertise to maximize the safety of all involved. DDR practitioners should be aware of the requirements imposed on States by UN Security Council resolutions 2370 (2017) and 2482 (2019) and Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum, in terms of, inter alia, ensuring that appropriate legal actions are taken against those who knowingly engage in providing terrorists with weapons.4 \\n Lack of sustainability: Disarmament operations shall not start unless the sustainability of funding and resources is guaranteed. Previous attempts to carry out disarmament operations with insufficient assets and funds have resulted in unconstructive, partial disarmament, a return to armed conflict, and the failure of the entire DDR process. The reconfiguring and closing of UN missions is another crucial moment that should be planned in advance. Such transitions often require handing over responsibility to national authorities or to the United Nations Country Team (UNCT). It is important to ensure these entities have the mandate and capacity to complete the DDR programme even after the withdrawal of UN mission resources.", + "Paragraph": "There are likely to be several operational risks, depending on the context, including the following: \n Threats to the safety and security of DDR programme personnel (both UN and non-UN): During the disarmament phase of the DDR programme, staff are likely to be in direct contact with armed individuals, including members of both armed forces and groups. Staff should be conscious not only of the risks associated with handling weapons, ammunition and explosives, but also of the risks of unpredictable behaviour as a result of the significant levels of stress that disarmament activities can generate among combatants and other stakeholders. \n Avoid supporting weapons buy-back: UN supported DDR programmes shall avoid attaching monetary value to weapons as a means of encouraging their surrender by members of armed forces and groups. Weapons buy-back programmes within and outside DDR have proven to be inefficient and even counter-productive as they tend to fuel national and regional arms flows, which in the end can jeopardize the achievement of disarmament objectives in a DDR programme. Buy-back programmes can also have unintended societal consequences such as economically rewarding combatants and exacerbating existing gender inequalities \n Disarmament of foreign combatants: Disarmament operations may also need to consider armed foreign combatants. Foreign combatants may be disarmed in the host country or at the border of the country of origin to which they will be returning. DDR programmes should plan for disarmament of foreign combatants within or outside repatriation agreements between the country of origin and the host country (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements). \n Terrorism and violent extremism threats: DDR programmes are increasingly being conducted in contexts affected by terrorism. Disarmament operations in these contexts require the highest security safeguards and robust on-site WAM expertise to maximize the safety of all involved. DDR practitioners should be aware of the requirements imposed on States by UN Security Council resolutions 2370 (2017) and 2482 (2019) and Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum, in terms of, inter alia, ensuring that appropriate legal actions are taken against those who knowingly engage in providing terrorists with weapons.4 \n Lack of sustainability: Disarmament operations shall not start unless the sustainability of funding and resources is guaranteed. Previous attempts to carry out disarmament operations with insufficient assets and funds have resulted in unconstructive, partial disarmament, a return to armed conflict, and the failure of the entire DDR process. The reconfiguring and closing of UN missions is another crucial moment that should be planned in advance. Such transitions often require handing over responsibility to national authorities or to the United Nations Country Team (UNCT). It is important to ensure these entities have the mandate and capacity to complete the DDR programme even after the withdrawal of UN mission resources.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -70165,7 +70165,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1251, - "Paragraph": "There are likely to be several operational risks, depending on the context, including the following: \\n Threats to the safety and security of DDR programme personnel (both UN and non-UN): During the disarmament phase of the DDR programme, staff are likely to be in direct contact with armed individuals, including members of both armed forces and groups. Staff should be conscious not only of the risks associated with handling weapons, ammunition and explosives, but also of the risks of unpredictable behaviour as a result of the significant levels of stress that disarmament activities can generate among combatants and other stakeholders. \\n Avoid supporting weapons buy-back: UN supported DDR programmes shall avoid attaching monetary value to weapons as a means of encouraging their surrender by members of armed forces and groups. Weapons buy-back programmes within and outside DDR have proven to be inefficient and even counter-productive as they tend to fuel national and regional arms flows, which in the end can jeopardize the achievement of disarmament objectives in a DDR programme. Buy-back programmes can also have unintended societal consequences such as economically rewarding combatants and exacerbating existing gender inequalities \\n Disarmament of foreign combatants: Disarmament operations may also need to consider armed foreign combatants. Foreign combatants may be disarmed in the host country or at the border of the country of origin to which they will be returning. DDR programmes should plan for disarmament of foreign combatants within or outside repatriation agreements between the country of origin and the host country (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements). \\n Terrorism and violent extremism threats: DDR programmes are increasingly being conducted in contexts affected by terrorism. Disarmament operations in these contexts require the highest security safeguards and robust on-site WAM expertise to maximize the safety of all involved. DDR practitioners should be aware of the requirements imposed on States by UN Security Council resolutions 2370 (2017) and 2482 (2019) and Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum, in terms of, inter alia, ensuring that appropriate legal actions are taken against those who knowingly engage in providing terrorists with weapons.4 \\n Lack of sustainability: Disarmament operations shall not start unless the sustainability of funding and resources is guaranteed. Previous attempts to carry out disarmament operations with insufficient assets and funds have resulted in unconstructive, partial disarmament, a return to armed conflict, and the failure of the entire DDR process. The reconfiguring and closing of UN missions is another crucial moment that should be planned in advance. Such transitions often require handing over responsibility to national authorities or to the United Nations Country Team (UNCT). It is important to ensure these entities have the mandate and capacity to complete the DDR programme even after the withdrawal of UN mission resources.", + "Paragraph": "There are likely to be several operational risks, depending on the context, including the following: \n Threats to the safety and security of DDR programme personnel (both UN and non-UN): During the disarmament phase of the DDR programme, staff are likely to be in direct contact with armed individuals, including members of both armed forces and groups. Staff should be conscious not only of the risks associated with handling weapons, ammunition and explosives, but also of the risks of unpredictable behaviour as a result of the significant levels of stress that disarmament activities can generate among combatants and other stakeholders. \n Avoid supporting weapons buy-back: UN supported DDR programmes shall avoid attaching monetary value to weapons as a means of encouraging their surrender by members of armed forces and groups. Weapons buy-back programmes within and outside DDR have proven to be inefficient and even counter-productive as they tend to fuel national and regional arms flows, which in the end can jeopardize the achievement of disarmament objectives in a DDR programme. Buy-back programmes can also have unintended societal consequences such as economically rewarding combatants and exacerbating existing gender inequalities \n Disarmament of foreign combatants: Disarmament operations may also need to consider armed foreign combatants. Foreign combatants may be disarmed in the host country or at the border of the country of origin to which they will be returning. DDR programmes should plan for disarmament of foreign combatants within or outside repatriation agreements between the country of origin and the host country (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements). \n Terrorism and violent extremism threats: DDR programmes are increasingly being conducted in contexts affected by terrorism. Disarmament operations in these contexts require the highest security safeguards and robust on-site WAM expertise to maximize the safety of all involved. DDR practitioners should be aware of the requirements imposed on States by UN Security Council resolutions 2370 (2017) and 2482 (2019) and Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum, in terms of, inter alia, ensuring that appropriate legal actions are taken against those who knowingly engage in providing terrorists with weapons.4 \n Lack of sustainability: Disarmament operations shall not start unless the sustainability of funding and resources is guaranteed. Previous attempts to carry out disarmament operations with insufficient assets and funds have resulted in unconstructive, partial disarmament, a return to armed conflict, and the failure of the entire DDR process. The reconfiguring and closing of UN missions is another crucial moment that should be planned in advance. Such transitions often require handing over responsibility to national authorities or to the United Nations Country Team (UNCT). It is important to ensure these entities have the mandate and capacity to complete the DDR programme even after the withdrawal of UN mission resources.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -70183,7 +70183,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1251, - "Paragraph": "There are likely to be several operational risks, depending on the context, including the following: \\n Threats to the safety and security of DDR programme personnel (both UN and non-UN): During the disarmament phase of the DDR programme, staff are likely to be in direct contact with armed individuals, including members of both armed forces and groups. Staff should be conscious not only of the risks associated with handling weapons, ammunition and explosives, but also of the risks of unpredictable behaviour as a result of the significant levels of stress that disarmament activities can generate among combatants and other stakeholders. \\n Avoid supporting weapons buy-back: UN supported DDR programmes shall avoid attaching monetary value to weapons as a means of encouraging their surrender by members of armed forces and groups. Weapons buy-back programmes within and outside DDR have proven to be inefficient and even counter-productive as they tend to fuel national and regional arms flows, which in the end can jeopardize the achievement of disarmament objectives in a DDR programme. Buy-back programmes can also have unintended societal consequences such as economically rewarding combatants and exacerbating existing gender inequalities \\n Disarmament of foreign combatants: Disarmament operations may also need to consider armed foreign combatants. Foreign combatants may be disarmed in the host country or at the border of the country of origin to which they will be returning. DDR programmes should plan for disarmament of foreign combatants within or outside repatriation agreements between the country of origin and the host country (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements). \\n Terrorism and violent extremism threats: DDR programmes are increasingly being conducted in contexts affected by terrorism. Disarmament operations in these contexts require the highest security safeguards and robust on-site WAM expertise to maximize the safety of all involved. DDR practitioners should be aware of the requirements imposed on States by UN Security Council resolutions 2370 (2017) and 2482 (2019) and Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum, in terms of, inter alia, ensuring that appropriate legal actions are taken against those who knowingly engage in providing terrorists with weapons.4 \\n Lack of sustainability: Disarmament operations shall not start unless the sustainability of funding and resources is guaranteed. Previous attempts to carry out disarmament operations with insufficient assets and funds have resulted in unconstructive, partial disarmament, a return to armed conflict, and the failure of the entire DDR process. The reconfiguring and closing of UN missions is another crucial moment that should be planned in advance. Such transitions often require handing over responsibility to national authorities or to the United Nations Country Team (UNCT). It is important to ensure these entities have the mandate and capacity to complete the DDR programme even after the withdrawal of UN mission resources.", + "Paragraph": "There are likely to be several operational risks, depending on the context, including the following: \n Threats to the safety and security of DDR programme personnel (both UN and non-UN): During the disarmament phase of the DDR programme, staff are likely to be in direct contact with armed individuals, including members of both armed forces and groups. Staff should be conscious not only of the risks associated with handling weapons, ammunition and explosives, but also of the risks of unpredictable behaviour as a result of the significant levels of stress that disarmament activities can generate among combatants and other stakeholders. \n Avoid supporting weapons buy-back: UN supported DDR programmes shall avoid attaching monetary value to weapons as a means of encouraging their surrender by members of armed forces and groups. Weapons buy-back programmes within and outside DDR have proven to be inefficient and even counter-productive as they tend to fuel national and regional arms flows, which in the end can jeopardize the achievement of disarmament objectives in a DDR programme. Buy-back programmes can also have unintended societal consequences such as economically rewarding combatants and exacerbating existing gender inequalities \n Disarmament of foreign combatants: Disarmament operations may also need to consider armed foreign combatants. Foreign combatants may be disarmed in the host country or at the border of the country of origin to which they will be returning. DDR programmes should plan for disarmament of foreign combatants within or outside repatriation agreements between the country of origin and the host country (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements). \n Terrorism and violent extremism threats: DDR programmes are increasingly being conducted in contexts affected by terrorism. Disarmament operations in these contexts require the highest security safeguards and robust on-site WAM expertise to maximize the safety of all involved. DDR practitioners should be aware of the requirements imposed on States by UN Security Council resolutions 2370 (2017) and 2482 (2019) and Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum, in terms of, inter alia, ensuring that appropriate legal actions are taken against those who knowingly engage in providing terrorists with weapons.4 \n Lack of sustainability: Disarmament operations shall not start unless the sustainability of funding and resources is guaranteed. Previous attempts to carry out disarmament operations with insufficient assets and funds have resulted in unconstructive, partial disarmament, a return to armed conflict, and the failure of the entire DDR process. The reconfiguring and closing of UN missions is another crucial moment that should be planned in advance. Such transitions often require handing over responsibility to national authorities or to the United Nations Country Team (UNCT). It is important to ensure these entities have the mandate and capacity to complete the DDR programme even after the withdrawal of UN mission resources.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -70777,7 +70777,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1262, - "Paragraph": "BOX 3: TYPOLOGY OF FEMALE PARTICIPANTS AND BENEFICIARIES \\n Female combatants: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts as active combatants using arms. \\n Female supporters\/women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG): Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts in support roles, whether by force or voluntarily. Rather than being members of a civilian community, they are economically and socially dependent on the armed force or group for their income and social support (examples: porters, cooks, nurses, spies, administrators, translators, radio operators, medical assistants, public information officers, camp leaders, sex workers\/slaves). \\n Female dependants: Women and girls who are part of ex-combatants\u2019 households. They are mainly socially and financially dependent on ex-combatants, although they may also have kept other community ties (examples: wives\/war wives, children, mothers\/parents, female siblings, female members of the extended family).", + "Paragraph": "BOX 3: TYPOLOGY OF FEMALE PARTICIPANTS AND BENEFICIARIES \n Female combatants: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts as active combatants using arms. \n Female supporters\/women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG): Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts in support roles, whether by force or voluntarily. Rather than being members of a civilian community, they are economically and socially dependent on the armed force or group for their income and social support (examples: porters, cooks, nurses, spies, administrators, translators, radio operators, medical assistants, public information officers, camp leaders, sex workers\/slaves). \n Female dependants: Women and girls who are part of ex-combatants\u2019 households. They are mainly socially and financially dependent on ex-combatants, although they may also have kept other community ties (examples: wives\/war wives, children, mothers\/parents, female siblings, female members of the extended family).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -70788,14 +70788,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.5 Eligibility criteria for access to DDR programmes", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "BOX 3: TYPOLOGY OF FEMALE PARTICIPANTS AND BENEFICIARIES \\n Female combatants: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts as active combatants using arms.", + "Sentence": "BOX 3: TYPOLOGY OF FEMALE PARTICIPANTS AND BENEFICIARIES \n Female combatants: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts as active combatants using arms.", "newParagraph": "box 3 typology female participant beneficiary n female combatant woman girl participated armed conflict active combatant using arm n female supporterswomen associated armed force group waafg woman girl participated armed conflict support role whether force voluntarily rather member civilian community economically socially dependent armed force group income social support example porter cook nurse spy administrator translator radio operator medical assistant public information officer camp leader sex workersslaves n female dependant woman girl part excombatants household mainly socially financially dependent excombatants although may also kept community tie example wiveswar wife child mothersparents female sibling female member extended family", "ProcessedSent": "box 3 typology female participant beneficiary n female combatant woman girl participated armed conflict active combatant using arm", "SentID": 3932 }, { "ParagraphID": 1262, - "Paragraph": "BOX 3: TYPOLOGY OF FEMALE PARTICIPANTS AND BENEFICIARIES \\n Female combatants: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts as active combatants using arms. \\n Female supporters\/women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG): Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts in support roles, whether by force or voluntarily. Rather than being members of a civilian community, they are economically and socially dependent on the armed force or group for their income and social support (examples: porters, cooks, nurses, spies, administrators, translators, radio operators, medical assistants, public information officers, camp leaders, sex workers\/slaves). \\n Female dependants: Women and girls who are part of ex-combatants\u2019 households. They are mainly socially and financially dependent on ex-combatants, although they may also have kept other community ties (examples: wives\/war wives, children, mothers\/parents, female siblings, female members of the extended family).", + "Paragraph": "BOX 3: TYPOLOGY OF FEMALE PARTICIPANTS AND BENEFICIARIES \n Female combatants: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts as active combatants using arms. \n Female supporters\/women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG): Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts in support roles, whether by force or voluntarily. Rather than being members of a civilian community, they are economically and socially dependent on the armed force or group for their income and social support (examples: porters, cooks, nurses, spies, administrators, translators, radio operators, medical assistants, public information officers, camp leaders, sex workers\/slaves). \n Female dependants: Women and girls who are part of ex-combatants\u2019 households. They are mainly socially and financially dependent on ex-combatants, although they may also have kept other community ties (examples: wives\/war wives, children, mothers\/parents, female siblings, female members of the extended family).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -70806,14 +70806,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.5 Eligibility criteria for access to DDR programmes", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Female supporters\/women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG): Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts in support roles, whether by force or voluntarily.", + "Sentence": "\n Female supporters\/women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG): Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts in support roles, whether by force or voluntarily.", "newParagraph": "box 3 typology female participant beneficiary n female combatant woman girl participated armed conflict active combatant using arm n female supporterswomen associated armed force group waafg woman girl participated armed conflict support role whether force voluntarily rather member civilian community economically socially dependent armed force group income social support example porter cook nurse spy administrator translator radio operator medical assistant public information officer camp leader sex workersslaves n female dependant woman girl part excombatants household mainly socially financially dependent excombatants although may also kept community tie example wiveswar wife child mothersparents female sibling female member extended family", "ProcessedSent": "n female supporterswomen associated armed force group waafg woman girl participated armed conflict support role whether force voluntarily", "SentID": 3933 }, { "ParagraphID": 1262, - "Paragraph": "BOX 3: TYPOLOGY OF FEMALE PARTICIPANTS AND BENEFICIARIES \\n Female combatants: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts as active combatants using arms. \\n Female supporters\/women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG): Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts in support roles, whether by force or voluntarily. Rather than being members of a civilian community, they are economically and socially dependent on the armed force or group for their income and social support (examples: porters, cooks, nurses, spies, administrators, translators, radio operators, medical assistants, public information officers, camp leaders, sex workers\/slaves). \\n Female dependants: Women and girls who are part of ex-combatants\u2019 households. They are mainly socially and financially dependent on ex-combatants, although they may also have kept other community ties (examples: wives\/war wives, children, mothers\/parents, female siblings, female members of the extended family).", + "Paragraph": "BOX 3: TYPOLOGY OF FEMALE PARTICIPANTS AND BENEFICIARIES \n Female combatants: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts as active combatants using arms. \n Female supporters\/women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG): Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts in support roles, whether by force or voluntarily. Rather than being members of a civilian community, they are economically and socially dependent on the armed force or group for their income and social support (examples: porters, cooks, nurses, spies, administrators, translators, radio operators, medical assistants, public information officers, camp leaders, sex workers\/slaves). \n Female dependants: Women and girls who are part of ex-combatants\u2019 households. They are mainly socially and financially dependent on ex-combatants, although they may also have kept other community ties (examples: wives\/war wives, children, mothers\/parents, female siblings, female members of the extended family).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -70831,7 +70831,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1262, - "Paragraph": "BOX 3: TYPOLOGY OF FEMALE PARTICIPANTS AND BENEFICIARIES \\n Female combatants: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts as active combatants using arms. \\n Female supporters\/women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG): Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts in support roles, whether by force or voluntarily. Rather than being members of a civilian community, they are economically and socially dependent on the armed force or group for their income and social support (examples: porters, cooks, nurses, spies, administrators, translators, radio operators, medical assistants, public information officers, camp leaders, sex workers\/slaves). \\n Female dependants: Women and girls who are part of ex-combatants\u2019 households. They are mainly socially and financially dependent on ex-combatants, although they may also have kept other community ties (examples: wives\/war wives, children, mothers\/parents, female siblings, female members of the extended family).", + "Paragraph": "BOX 3: TYPOLOGY OF FEMALE PARTICIPANTS AND BENEFICIARIES \n Female combatants: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts as active combatants using arms. \n Female supporters\/women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG): Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts in support roles, whether by force or voluntarily. Rather than being members of a civilian community, they are economically and socially dependent on the armed force or group for their income and social support (examples: porters, cooks, nurses, spies, administrators, translators, radio operators, medical assistants, public information officers, camp leaders, sex workers\/slaves). \n Female dependants: Women and girls who are part of ex-combatants\u2019 households. They are mainly socially and financially dependent on ex-combatants, although they may also have kept other community ties (examples: wives\/war wives, children, mothers\/parents, female siblings, female members of the extended family).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -70842,14 +70842,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.5 Eligibility criteria for access to DDR programmes", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Female dependants: Women and girls who are part of ex-combatants\u2019 households.", + "Sentence": "\n Female dependants: Women and girls who are part of ex-combatants\u2019 households.", "newParagraph": "box 3 typology female participant beneficiary n female combatant woman girl participated armed conflict active combatant using arm n female supporterswomen associated armed force group waafg woman girl participated armed conflict support role whether force voluntarily rather member civilian community economically socially dependent armed force group income social support example porter cook nurse spy administrator translator radio operator medical assistant public information officer camp leader sex workersslaves n female dependant woman girl part excombatants household mainly socially financially dependent excombatants although may also kept community tie example wiveswar wife child mothersparents female sibling female member extended family", "ProcessedSent": "n female dependant woman girl part excombatants household", "SentID": 3935 }, { "ParagraphID": 1262, - "Paragraph": "BOX 3: TYPOLOGY OF FEMALE PARTICIPANTS AND BENEFICIARIES \\n Female combatants: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts as active combatants using arms. \\n Female supporters\/women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG): Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts in support roles, whether by force or voluntarily. Rather than being members of a civilian community, they are economically and socially dependent on the armed force or group for their income and social support (examples: porters, cooks, nurses, spies, administrators, translators, radio operators, medical assistants, public information officers, camp leaders, sex workers\/slaves). \\n Female dependants: Women and girls who are part of ex-combatants\u2019 households. They are mainly socially and financially dependent on ex-combatants, although they may also have kept other community ties (examples: wives\/war wives, children, mothers\/parents, female siblings, female members of the extended family).", + "Paragraph": "BOX 3: TYPOLOGY OF FEMALE PARTICIPANTS AND BENEFICIARIES \n Female combatants: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts as active combatants using arms. \n Female supporters\/women associated with armed forces and groups (WAAFG): Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts in support roles, whether by force or voluntarily. Rather than being members of a civilian community, they are economically and socially dependent on the armed force or group for their income and social support (examples: porters, cooks, nurses, spies, administrators, translators, radio operators, medical assistants, public information officers, camp leaders, sex workers\/slaves). \n Female dependants: Women and girls who are part of ex-combatants\u2019 households. They are mainly socially and financially dependent on ex-combatants, although they may also have kept other community ties (examples: wives\/war wives, children, mothers\/parents, female siblings, female members of the extended family).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -71245,7 +71245,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1268, - "Paragraph": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \\n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential. Public information and sensitization campaigns will have a strong influence on the success of the entire DDR programme (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR). \\n\\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \\n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm. \\n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures. \\n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant. \\n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction). \\n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). \\n Manage expectations. \\n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country. \\n\\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins. Awareness-raising campaigns shall take into consideration the findings of gender analysis in the design and implementation of programme activities. DDR practitioners shall ensure representation of all genders and ages in the campaign; engage youth, women and women\u2019s groups; and mitigate against the risk of linking gender identities with weapons, reinforcing violent masculinities and other gender stereotypes. Media and awareness activities are critical channels to counter the socially constructed yet enduring associations between small arms, protection, power and masculinity. \\n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion. If destruction of ammunition is planned, it is also important to inform communities beforehand to avoid misunderstandings and unnecessary tensions. Finally, during ongoing operations, details on progress towards the objectives of the disarmament programme should be disseminated to help reassure stakeholders and communities that the number of illicit weapons in circulation is being reduced, and that overall security is improving.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential. Public information and sensitization campaigns will have a strong influence on the success of the entire DDR programme (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR). \n\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm. \n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures. \n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant. \n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction). \n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). \n Manage expectations. \n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country. \n\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins. Awareness-raising campaigns shall take into consideration the findings of gender analysis in the design and implementation of programme activities. DDR practitioners shall ensure representation of all genders and ages in the campaign; engage youth, women and women\u2019s groups; and mitigate against the risk of linking gender identities with weapons, reinforcing violent masculinities and other gender stereotypes. Media and awareness activities are critical channels to counter the socially constructed yet enduring associations between small arms, protection, power and masculinity. \n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion. If destruction of ammunition is planned, it is also important to inform communities beforehand to avoid misunderstandings and unnecessary tensions. Finally, during ongoing operations, details on progress towards the objectives of the disarmament programme should be disseminated to help reassure stakeholders and communities that the number of illicit weapons in circulation is being reduced, and that overall security is improving.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -71256,14 +71256,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.5 Eligibility criteria for access to DDR programmes", "Heading3": "5.5.1 Weapons-related eligibility criteria", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \\n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential.", + "Sentence": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential.", "newParagraph": "box 4 disarmament awareness activity n weapon successfully removed early ongoing information sensitization armed force group well affected community planned collection process essential public information sensitization campaign strong influence success entire ddr programme see iddrs 460 public information strategic communication support ddr nn addition direct contact armed force group community representative range medium including radio print medium tv social medium used n encourage combatant person associated armed force group disarm n inform armed force group location date disarmament explain procedure including security measure n explain happen collected arm ammunition absence legal repercussion relevant n explain eligibility criterion entering ddr programme provide information potential alternative noneligible individual see iddrs 230 community violence reduction n explain legal implication including amnesty assurance nonprosecution see iddrs 211 legal framework un ddr n manage expectation n distinguish voluntary disarmament armed force group part ddr programme prior forced disarmament past ongoing forced disarmament country nn professional genderresponsive ageappropriate ddr awareness campaign weapon collection component ddr programme conducted well collection phase begin awarenessraising campaign shall take consideration finding gender analysis design implementation programme activity ddr practitioner shall ensure representation gender age campaign engage youth woman woman group mitigate risk linking gender identity weapon reinforcing violent masculinity gender stereotype medium awareness activity critical channel counter socially constructed yet enduring association small arm protection power masculinity n key local community made aware ongoing disarmament operation presence movement armed individual create confusion destruction ammunition planned also important inform community beforehand avoid misunderstanding unnecessary tension finally ongoing operation detail progress towards objective disarmament programme disseminated help reassure stakeholder community number illicit weapon circulation reduced overall security improving", "ProcessedSent": "box 4 disarmament awareness activity n weapon successfully removed early ongoing information sensitization armed force group well affected community planned collection process essential", "SentID": 3958 }, { "ParagraphID": 1268, - "Paragraph": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \\n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential. Public information and sensitization campaigns will have a strong influence on the success of the entire DDR programme (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR). \\n\\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \\n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm. \\n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures. \\n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant. \\n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction). \\n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). \\n Manage expectations. \\n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country. \\n\\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins. Awareness-raising campaigns shall take into consideration the findings of gender analysis in the design and implementation of programme activities. DDR practitioners shall ensure representation of all genders and ages in the campaign; engage youth, women and women\u2019s groups; and mitigate against the risk of linking gender identities with weapons, reinforcing violent masculinities and other gender stereotypes. Media and awareness activities are critical channels to counter the socially constructed yet enduring associations between small arms, protection, power and masculinity. \\n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion. If destruction of ammunition is planned, it is also important to inform communities beforehand to avoid misunderstandings and unnecessary tensions. Finally, during ongoing operations, details on progress towards the objectives of the disarmament programme should be disseminated to help reassure stakeholders and communities that the number of illicit weapons in circulation is being reduced, and that overall security is improving.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential. Public information and sensitization campaigns will have a strong influence on the success of the entire DDR programme (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR). \n\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm. \n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures. \n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant. \n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction). \n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). \n Manage expectations. \n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country. \n\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins. Awareness-raising campaigns shall take into consideration the findings of gender analysis in the design and implementation of programme activities. DDR practitioners shall ensure representation of all genders and ages in the campaign; engage youth, women and women\u2019s groups; and mitigate against the risk of linking gender identities with weapons, reinforcing violent masculinities and other gender stereotypes. Media and awareness activities are critical channels to counter the socially constructed yet enduring associations between small arms, protection, power and masculinity. \n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion. If destruction of ammunition is planned, it is also important to inform communities beforehand to avoid misunderstandings and unnecessary tensions. Finally, during ongoing operations, details on progress towards the objectives of the disarmament programme should be disseminated to help reassure stakeholders and communities that the number of illicit weapons in circulation is being reduced, and that overall security is improving.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -71281,7 +71281,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1268, - "Paragraph": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \\n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential. Public information and sensitization campaigns will have a strong influence on the success of the entire DDR programme (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR). \\n\\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \\n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm. \\n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures. \\n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant. \\n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction). \\n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). \\n Manage expectations. \\n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country. \\n\\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins. Awareness-raising campaigns shall take into consideration the findings of gender analysis in the design and implementation of programme activities. DDR practitioners shall ensure representation of all genders and ages in the campaign; engage youth, women and women\u2019s groups; and mitigate against the risk of linking gender identities with weapons, reinforcing violent masculinities and other gender stereotypes. Media and awareness activities are critical channels to counter the socially constructed yet enduring associations between small arms, protection, power and masculinity. \\n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion. If destruction of ammunition is planned, it is also important to inform communities beforehand to avoid misunderstandings and unnecessary tensions. Finally, during ongoing operations, details on progress towards the objectives of the disarmament programme should be disseminated to help reassure stakeholders and communities that the number of illicit weapons in circulation is being reduced, and that overall security is improving.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential. Public information and sensitization campaigns will have a strong influence on the success of the entire DDR programme (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR). \n\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm. \n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures. \n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant. \n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction). \n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). \n Manage expectations. \n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country. \n\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins. Awareness-raising campaigns shall take into consideration the findings of gender analysis in the design and implementation of programme activities. DDR practitioners shall ensure representation of all genders and ages in the campaign; engage youth, women and women\u2019s groups; and mitigate against the risk of linking gender identities with weapons, reinforcing violent masculinities and other gender stereotypes. Media and awareness activities are critical channels to counter the socially constructed yet enduring associations between small arms, protection, power and masculinity. \n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion. If destruction of ammunition is planned, it is also important to inform communities beforehand to avoid misunderstandings and unnecessary tensions. Finally, during ongoing operations, details on progress towards the objectives of the disarmament programme should be disseminated to help reassure stakeholders and communities that the number of illicit weapons in circulation is being reduced, and that overall security is improving.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -71292,14 +71292,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.5 Eligibility criteria for access to DDR programmes", "Heading3": "5.5.1 Weapons-related eligibility criteria", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \\n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm.", + "Sentence": "\n\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm.", "newParagraph": "box 4 disarmament awareness activity n weapon successfully removed early ongoing information sensitization armed force group well affected community planned collection process essential public information sensitization campaign strong influence success entire ddr programme see iddrs 460 public information strategic communication support ddr nn addition direct contact armed force group community representative range medium including radio print medium tv social medium used n encourage combatant person associated armed force group disarm n inform armed force group location date disarmament explain procedure including security measure n explain happen collected arm ammunition absence legal repercussion relevant n explain eligibility criterion entering ddr programme provide information potential alternative noneligible individual see iddrs 230 community violence reduction n explain legal implication including amnesty assurance nonprosecution see iddrs 211 legal framework un ddr n manage expectation n distinguish voluntary disarmament armed force group part ddr programme prior forced disarmament past ongoing forced disarmament country nn professional genderresponsive ageappropriate ddr awareness campaign weapon collection component ddr programme conducted well collection phase begin awarenessraising campaign shall take consideration finding gender analysis design implementation programme activity ddr practitioner shall ensure representation gender age campaign engage youth woman woman group mitigate risk linking gender identity weapon reinforcing violent masculinity gender stereotype medium awareness activity critical channel counter socially constructed yet enduring association small arm protection power masculinity n key local community made aware ongoing disarmament operation presence movement armed individual create confusion destruction ammunition planned also important inform community beforehand avoid misunderstanding unnecessary tension finally ongoing operation detail progress towards objective disarmament programme disseminated help reassure stakeholder community number illicit weapon circulation reduced overall security improving", "ProcessedSent": "nn addition direct contact armed force group community representative range medium including radio print medium tv social medium used n encourage combatant person associated armed force group disarm", "SentID": 3960 }, { "ParagraphID": 1268, - "Paragraph": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \\n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential. Public information and sensitization campaigns will have a strong influence on the success of the entire DDR programme (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR). \\n\\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \\n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm. \\n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures. \\n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant. \\n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction). \\n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). \\n Manage expectations. \\n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country. \\n\\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins. Awareness-raising campaigns shall take into consideration the findings of gender analysis in the design and implementation of programme activities. DDR practitioners shall ensure representation of all genders and ages in the campaign; engage youth, women and women\u2019s groups; and mitigate against the risk of linking gender identities with weapons, reinforcing violent masculinities and other gender stereotypes. Media and awareness activities are critical channels to counter the socially constructed yet enduring associations between small arms, protection, power and masculinity. \\n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion. If destruction of ammunition is planned, it is also important to inform communities beforehand to avoid misunderstandings and unnecessary tensions. Finally, during ongoing operations, details on progress towards the objectives of the disarmament programme should be disseminated to help reassure stakeholders and communities that the number of illicit weapons in circulation is being reduced, and that overall security is improving.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential. Public information and sensitization campaigns will have a strong influence on the success of the entire DDR programme (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR). \n\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm. \n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures. \n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant. \n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction). \n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). \n Manage expectations. \n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country. \n\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins. Awareness-raising campaigns shall take into consideration the findings of gender analysis in the design and implementation of programme activities. DDR practitioners shall ensure representation of all genders and ages in the campaign; engage youth, women and women\u2019s groups; and mitigate against the risk of linking gender identities with weapons, reinforcing violent masculinities and other gender stereotypes. Media and awareness activities are critical channels to counter the socially constructed yet enduring associations between small arms, protection, power and masculinity. \n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion. If destruction of ammunition is planned, it is also important to inform communities beforehand to avoid misunderstandings and unnecessary tensions. Finally, during ongoing operations, details on progress towards the objectives of the disarmament programme should be disseminated to help reassure stakeholders and communities that the number of illicit weapons in circulation is being reduced, and that overall security is improving.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -71310,14 +71310,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.5 Eligibility criteria for access to DDR programmes", "Heading3": "5.5.1 Weapons-related eligibility criteria", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures.", + "Sentence": "\n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures.", "newParagraph": "box 4 disarmament awareness activity n weapon successfully removed early ongoing information sensitization armed force group well affected community planned collection process essential public information sensitization campaign strong influence success entire ddr programme see iddrs 460 public information strategic communication support ddr nn addition direct contact armed force group community representative range medium including radio print medium tv social medium used n encourage combatant person associated armed force group disarm n inform armed force group location date disarmament explain procedure including security measure n explain happen collected arm ammunition absence legal repercussion relevant n explain eligibility criterion entering ddr programme provide information potential alternative noneligible individual see iddrs 230 community violence reduction n explain legal implication including amnesty assurance nonprosecution see iddrs 211 legal framework un ddr n manage expectation n distinguish voluntary disarmament armed force group part ddr programme prior forced disarmament past ongoing forced disarmament country nn professional genderresponsive ageappropriate ddr awareness campaign weapon collection component ddr programme conducted well collection phase begin awarenessraising campaign shall take consideration finding gender analysis design implementation programme activity ddr practitioner shall ensure representation gender age campaign engage youth woman woman group mitigate risk linking gender identity weapon reinforcing violent masculinity gender stereotype medium awareness activity critical channel counter socially constructed yet enduring association small arm protection power masculinity n key local community made aware ongoing disarmament operation presence movement armed individual create confusion destruction ammunition planned also important inform community beforehand avoid misunderstanding unnecessary tension finally ongoing operation detail progress towards objective disarmament programme disseminated help reassure stakeholder community number illicit weapon circulation reduced overall security improving", "ProcessedSent": "n inform armed force group location date disarmament explain procedure including security measure", "SentID": 3961 }, { "ParagraphID": 1268, - "Paragraph": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \\n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential. Public information and sensitization campaigns will have a strong influence on the success of the entire DDR programme (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR). \\n\\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \\n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm. \\n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures. \\n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant. \\n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction). \\n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). \\n Manage expectations. \\n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country. \\n\\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins. Awareness-raising campaigns shall take into consideration the findings of gender analysis in the design and implementation of programme activities. DDR practitioners shall ensure representation of all genders and ages in the campaign; engage youth, women and women\u2019s groups; and mitigate against the risk of linking gender identities with weapons, reinforcing violent masculinities and other gender stereotypes. Media and awareness activities are critical channels to counter the socially constructed yet enduring associations between small arms, protection, power and masculinity. \\n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion. If destruction of ammunition is planned, it is also important to inform communities beforehand to avoid misunderstandings and unnecessary tensions. Finally, during ongoing operations, details on progress towards the objectives of the disarmament programme should be disseminated to help reassure stakeholders and communities that the number of illicit weapons in circulation is being reduced, and that overall security is improving.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential. Public information and sensitization campaigns will have a strong influence on the success of the entire DDR programme (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR). \n\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm. \n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures. \n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant. \n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction). \n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). \n Manage expectations. \n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country. \n\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins. Awareness-raising campaigns shall take into consideration the findings of gender analysis in the design and implementation of programme activities. DDR practitioners shall ensure representation of all genders and ages in the campaign; engage youth, women and women\u2019s groups; and mitigate against the risk of linking gender identities with weapons, reinforcing violent masculinities and other gender stereotypes. Media and awareness activities are critical channels to counter the socially constructed yet enduring associations between small arms, protection, power and masculinity. \n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion. If destruction of ammunition is planned, it is also important to inform communities beforehand to avoid misunderstandings and unnecessary tensions. Finally, during ongoing operations, details on progress towards the objectives of the disarmament programme should be disseminated to help reassure stakeholders and communities that the number of illicit weapons in circulation is being reduced, and that overall security is improving.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -71328,14 +71328,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.5 Eligibility criteria for access to DDR programmes", "Heading3": "5.5.1 Weapons-related eligibility criteria", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant.", + "Sentence": "\n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant.", "newParagraph": "box 4 disarmament awareness activity n weapon successfully removed early ongoing information sensitization armed force group well affected community planned collection process essential public information sensitization campaign strong influence success entire ddr programme see iddrs 460 public information strategic communication support ddr nn addition direct contact armed force group community representative range medium including radio print medium tv social medium used n encourage combatant person associated armed force group disarm n inform armed force group location date disarmament explain procedure including security measure n explain happen collected arm ammunition absence legal repercussion relevant n explain eligibility criterion entering ddr programme provide information potential alternative noneligible individual see iddrs 230 community violence reduction n explain legal implication including amnesty assurance nonprosecution see iddrs 211 legal framework un ddr n manage expectation n distinguish voluntary disarmament armed force group part ddr programme prior forced disarmament past ongoing forced disarmament country nn professional genderresponsive ageappropriate ddr awareness campaign weapon collection component ddr programme conducted well collection phase begin awarenessraising campaign shall take consideration finding gender analysis design implementation programme activity ddr practitioner shall ensure representation gender age campaign engage youth woman woman group mitigate risk linking gender identity weapon reinforcing violent masculinity gender stereotype medium awareness activity critical channel counter socially constructed yet enduring association small arm protection power masculinity n key local community made aware ongoing disarmament operation presence movement armed individual create confusion destruction ammunition planned also important inform community beforehand avoid misunderstanding unnecessary tension finally ongoing operation detail progress towards objective disarmament programme disseminated help reassure stakeholder community number illicit weapon circulation reduced overall security improving", "ProcessedSent": "n explain happen collected arm ammunition absence legal repercussion relevant", "SentID": 3962 }, { "ParagraphID": 1268, - "Paragraph": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \\n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential. Public information and sensitization campaigns will have a strong influence on the success of the entire DDR programme (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR). \\n\\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \\n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm. \\n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures. \\n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant. \\n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction). \\n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). \\n Manage expectations. \\n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country. \\n\\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins. Awareness-raising campaigns shall take into consideration the findings of gender analysis in the design and implementation of programme activities. DDR practitioners shall ensure representation of all genders and ages in the campaign; engage youth, women and women\u2019s groups; and mitigate against the risk of linking gender identities with weapons, reinforcing violent masculinities and other gender stereotypes. Media and awareness activities are critical channels to counter the socially constructed yet enduring associations between small arms, protection, power and masculinity. \\n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion. If destruction of ammunition is planned, it is also important to inform communities beforehand to avoid misunderstandings and unnecessary tensions. Finally, during ongoing operations, details on progress towards the objectives of the disarmament programme should be disseminated to help reassure stakeholders and communities that the number of illicit weapons in circulation is being reduced, and that overall security is improving.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential. Public information and sensitization campaigns will have a strong influence on the success of the entire DDR programme (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR). \n\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm. \n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures. \n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant. \n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction). \n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). \n Manage expectations. \n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country. \n\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins. Awareness-raising campaigns shall take into consideration the findings of gender analysis in the design and implementation of programme activities. DDR practitioners shall ensure representation of all genders and ages in the campaign; engage youth, women and women\u2019s groups; and mitigate against the risk of linking gender identities with weapons, reinforcing violent masculinities and other gender stereotypes. Media and awareness activities are critical channels to counter the socially constructed yet enduring associations between small arms, protection, power and masculinity. \n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion. If destruction of ammunition is planned, it is also important to inform communities beforehand to avoid misunderstandings and unnecessary tensions. Finally, during ongoing operations, details on progress towards the objectives of the disarmament programme should be disseminated to help reassure stakeholders and communities that the number of illicit weapons in circulation is being reduced, and that overall security is improving.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -71346,14 +71346,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.5 Eligibility criteria for access to DDR programmes", "Heading3": "5.5.1 Weapons-related eligibility criteria", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction).", + "Sentence": "\n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction).", "newParagraph": "box 4 disarmament awareness activity n weapon successfully removed early ongoing information sensitization armed force group well affected community planned collection process essential public information sensitization campaign strong influence success entire ddr programme see iddrs 460 public information strategic communication support ddr nn addition direct contact armed force group community representative range medium including radio print medium tv social medium used n encourage combatant person associated armed force group disarm n inform armed force group location date disarmament explain procedure including security measure n explain happen collected arm ammunition absence legal repercussion relevant n explain eligibility criterion entering ddr programme provide information potential alternative noneligible individual see iddrs 230 community violence reduction n explain legal implication including amnesty assurance nonprosecution see iddrs 211 legal framework un ddr n manage expectation n distinguish voluntary disarmament armed force group part ddr programme prior forced disarmament past ongoing forced disarmament country nn professional genderresponsive ageappropriate ddr awareness campaign weapon collection component ddr programme conducted well collection phase begin awarenessraising campaign shall take consideration finding gender analysis design implementation programme activity ddr practitioner shall ensure representation gender age campaign engage youth woman woman group mitigate risk linking gender identity weapon reinforcing violent masculinity gender stereotype medium awareness activity critical channel counter socially constructed yet enduring association small arm protection power masculinity n key local community made aware ongoing disarmament operation presence movement armed individual create confusion destruction ammunition planned also important inform community beforehand avoid misunderstanding unnecessary tension finally ongoing operation detail progress towards objective disarmament programme disseminated help reassure stakeholder community number illicit weapon circulation reduced overall security improving", "ProcessedSent": "n explain eligibility criterion entering ddr programme provide information potential alternative noneligible individual see iddrs 230 community violence reduction", "SentID": 3963 }, { "ParagraphID": 1268, - "Paragraph": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \\n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential. Public information and sensitization campaigns will have a strong influence on the success of the entire DDR programme (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR). \\n\\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \\n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm. \\n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures. \\n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant. \\n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction). \\n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). \\n Manage expectations. \\n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country. \\n\\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins. Awareness-raising campaigns shall take into consideration the findings of gender analysis in the design and implementation of programme activities. DDR practitioners shall ensure representation of all genders and ages in the campaign; engage youth, women and women\u2019s groups; and mitigate against the risk of linking gender identities with weapons, reinforcing violent masculinities and other gender stereotypes. Media and awareness activities are critical channels to counter the socially constructed yet enduring associations between small arms, protection, power and masculinity. \\n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion. If destruction of ammunition is planned, it is also important to inform communities beforehand to avoid misunderstandings and unnecessary tensions. Finally, during ongoing operations, details on progress towards the objectives of the disarmament programme should be disseminated to help reassure stakeholders and communities that the number of illicit weapons in circulation is being reduced, and that overall security is improving.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential. Public information and sensitization campaigns will have a strong influence on the success of the entire DDR programme (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR). \n\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm. \n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures. \n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant. \n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction). \n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). \n Manage expectations. \n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country. \n\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins. Awareness-raising campaigns shall take into consideration the findings of gender analysis in the design and implementation of programme activities. DDR practitioners shall ensure representation of all genders and ages in the campaign; engage youth, women and women\u2019s groups; and mitigate against the risk of linking gender identities with weapons, reinforcing violent masculinities and other gender stereotypes. Media and awareness activities are critical channels to counter the socially constructed yet enduring associations between small arms, protection, power and masculinity. \n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion. If destruction of ammunition is planned, it is also important to inform communities beforehand to avoid misunderstandings and unnecessary tensions. Finally, during ongoing operations, details on progress towards the objectives of the disarmament programme should be disseminated to help reassure stakeholders and communities that the number of illicit weapons in circulation is being reduced, and that overall security is improving.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -71364,14 +71364,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.5 Eligibility criteria for access to DDR programmes", "Heading3": "5.5.1 Weapons-related eligibility criteria", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", + "Sentence": "\n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", "newParagraph": "box 4 disarmament awareness activity n weapon successfully removed early ongoing information sensitization armed force group well affected community planned collection process essential public information sensitization campaign strong influence success entire ddr programme see iddrs 460 public information strategic communication support ddr nn addition direct contact armed force group community representative range medium including radio print medium tv social medium used n encourage combatant person associated armed force group disarm n inform armed force group location date disarmament explain procedure including security measure n explain happen collected arm ammunition absence legal repercussion relevant n explain eligibility criterion entering ddr programme provide information potential alternative noneligible individual see iddrs 230 community violence reduction n explain legal implication including amnesty assurance nonprosecution see iddrs 211 legal framework un ddr n manage expectation n distinguish voluntary disarmament armed force group part ddr programme prior forced disarmament past ongoing forced disarmament country nn professional genderresponsive ageappropriate ddr awareness campaign weapon collection component ddr programme conducted well collection phase begin awarenessraising campaign shall take consideration finding gender analysis design implementation programme activity ddr practitioner shall ensure representation gender age campaign engage youth woman woman group mitigate risk linking gender identity weapon reinforcing violent masculinity gender stereotype medium awareness activity critical channel counter socially constructed yet enduring association small arm protection power masculinity n key local community made aware ongoing disarmament operation presence movement armed individual create confusion destruction ammunition planned also important inform community beforehand avoid misunderstanding unnecessary tension finally ongoing operation detail progress towards objective disarmament programme disseminated help reassure stakeholder community number illicit weapon circulation reduced overall security improving", "ProcessedSent": "n explain legal implication including amnesty assurance nonprosecution see iddrs 211 legal framework un ddr", "SentID": 3964 }, { "ParagraphID": 1268, - "Paragraph": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \\n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential. Public information and sensitization campaigns will have a strong influence on the success of the entire DDR programme (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR). \\n\\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \\n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm. \\n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures. \\n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant. \\n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction). \\n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). \\n Manage expectations. \\n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country. \\n\\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins. Awareness-raising campaigns shall take into consideration the findings of gender analysis in the design and implementation of programme activities. DDR practitioners shall ensure representation of all genders and ages in the campaign; engage youth, women and women\u2019s groups; and mitigate against the risk of linking gender identities with weapons, reinforcing violent masculinities and other gender stereotypes. Media and awareness activities are critical channels to counter the socially constructed yet enduring associations between small arms, protection, power and masculinity. \\n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion. If destruction of ammunition is planned, it is also important to inform communities beforehand to avoid misunderstandings and unnecessary tensions. Finally, during ongoing operations, details on progress towards the objectives of the disarmament programme should be disseminated to help reassure stakeholders and communities that the number of illicit weapons in circulation is being reduced, and that overall security is improving.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential. Public information and sensitization campaigns will have a strong influence on the success of the entire DDR programme (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR). \n\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm. \n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures. \n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant. \n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction). \n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). \n Manage expectations. \n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country. \n\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins. Awareness-raising campaigns shall take into consideration the findings of gender analysis in the design and implementation of programme activities. DDR practitioners shall ensure representation of all genders and ages in the campaign; engage youth, women and women\u2019s groups; and mitigate against the risk of linking gender identities with weapons, reinforcing violent masculinities and other gender stereotypes. Media and awareness activities are critical channels to counter the socially constructed yet enduring associations between small arms, protection, power and masculinity. \n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion. If destruction of ammunition is planned, it is also important to inform communities beforehand to avoid misunderstandings and unnecessary tensions. Finally, during ongoing operations, details on progress towards the objectives of the disarmament programme should be disseminated to help reassure stakeholders and communities that the number of illicit weapons in circulation is being reduced, and that overall security is improving.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -71382,14 +71382,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.5 Eligibility criteria for access to DDR programmes", "Heading3": "5.5.1 Weapons-related eligibility criteria", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Manage expectations.", + "Sentence": "\n Manage expectations.", "newParagraph": "box 4 disarmament awareness activity n weapon successfully removed early ongoing information sensitization armed force group well affected community planned collection process essential public information sensitization campaign strong influence success entire ddr programme see iddrs 460 public information strategic communication support ddr nn addition direct contact armed force group community representative range medium including radio print medium tv social medium used n encourage combatant person associated armed force group disarm n inform armed force group location date disarmament explain procedure including security measure n explain happen collected arm ammunition absence legal repercussion relevant n explain eligibility criterion entering ddr programme provide information potential alternative noneligible individual see iddrs 230 community violence reduction n explain legal implication including amnesty assurance nonprosecution see iddrs 211 legal framework un ddr n manage expectation n distinguish voluntary disarmament armed force group part ddr programme prior forced disarmament past ongoing forced disarmament country nn professional genderresponsive ageappropriate ddr awareness campaign weapon collection component ddr programme conducted well collection phase begin awarenessraising campaign shall take consideration finding gender analysis design implementation programme activity ddr practitioner shall ensure representation gender age campaign engage youth woman woman group mitigate risk linking gender identity weapon reinforcing violent masculinity gender stereotype medium awareness activity critical channel counter socially constructed yet enduring association small arm protection power masculinity n key local community made aware ongoing disarmament operation presence movement armed individual create confusion destruction ammunition planned also important inform community beforehand avoid misunderstanding unnecessary tension finally ongoing operation detail progress towards objective disarmament programme disseminated help reassure stakeholder community number illicit weapon circulation reduced overall security improving", "ProcessedSent": "n manage expectation", "SentID": 3965 }, { "ParagraphID": 1268, - "Paragraph": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \\n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential. Public information and sensitization campaigns will have a strong influence on the success of the entire DDR programme (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR). \\n\\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \\n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm. \\n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures. \\n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant. \\n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction). \\n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). \\n Manage expectations. \\n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country. \\n\\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins. Awareness-raising campaigns shall take into consideration the findings of gender analysis in the design and implementation of programme activities. DDR practitioners shall ensure representation of all genders and ages in the campaign; engage youth, women and women\u2019s groups; and mitigate against the risk of linking gender identities with weapons, reinforcing violent masculinities and other gender stereotypes. Media and awareness activities are critical channels to counter the socially constructed yet enduring associations between small arms, protection, power and masculinity. \\n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion. If destruction of ammunition is planned, it is also important to inform communities beforehand to avoid misunderstandings and unnecessary tensions. Finally, during ongoing operations, details on progress towards the objectives of the disarmament programme should be disseminated to help reassure stakeholders and communities that the number of illicit weapons in circulation is being reduced, and that overall security is improving.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential. Public information and sensitization campaigns will have a strong influence on the success of the entire DDR programme (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR). \n\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm. \n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures. \n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant. \n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction). \n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). \n Manage expectations. \n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country. \n\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins. Awareness-raising campaigns shall take into consideration the findings of gender analysis in the design and implementation of programme activities. DDR practitioners shall ensure representation of all genders and ages in the campaign; engage youth, women and women\u2019s groups; and mitigate against the risk of linking gender identities with weapons, reinforcing violent masculinities and other gender stereotypes. Media and awareness activities are critical channels to counter the socially constructed yet enduring associations between small arms, protection, power and masculinity. \n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion. If destruction of ammunition is planned, it is also important to inform communities beforehand to avoid misunderstandings and unnecessary tensions. Finally, during ongoing operations, details on progress towards the objectives of the disarmament programme should be disseminated to help reassure stakeholders and communities that the number of illicit weapons in circulation is being reduced, and that overall security is improving.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -71400,14 +71400,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.5 Eligibility criteria for access to DDR programmes", "Heading3": "5.5.1 Weapons-related eligibility criteria", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country.", + "Sentence": "\n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country.", "newParagraph": "box 4 disarmament awareness activity n weapon successfully removed early ongoing information sensitization armed force group well affected community planned collection process essential public information sensitization campaign strong influence success entire ddr programme see iddrs 460 public information strategic communication support ddr nn addition direct contact armed force group community representative range medium including radio print medium tv social medium used n encourage combatant person associated armed force group disarm n inform armed force group location date disarmament explain procedure including security measure n explain happen collected arm ammunition absence legal repercussion relevant n explain eligibility criterion entering ddr programme provide information potential alternative noneligible individual see iddrs 230 community violence reduction n explain legal implication including amnesty assurance nonprosecution see iddrs 211 legal framework un ddr n manage expectation n distinguish voluntary disarmament armed force group part ddr programme prior forced disarmament past ongoing forced disarmament country nn professional genderresponsive ageappropriate ddr awareness campaign weapon collection component ddr programme conducted well collection phase begin awarenessraising campaign shall take consideration finding gender analysis design implementation programme activity ddr practitioner shall ensure representation gender age campaign engage youth woman woman group mitigate risk linking gender identity weapon reinforcing violent masculinity gender stereotype medium awareness activity critical channel counter socially constructed yet enduring association small arm protection power masculinity n key local community made aware ongoing disarmament operation presence movement armed individual create confusion destruction ammunition planned also important inform community beforehand avoid misunderstanding unnecessary tension finally ongoing operation detail progress towards objective disarmament programme disseminated help reassure stakeholder community number illicit weapon circulation reduced overall security improving", "ProcessedSent": "n distinguish voluntary disarmament armed force group part ddr programme prior forced disarmament past ongoing forced disarmament country", "SentID": 3966 }, { "ParagraphID": 1268, - "Paragraph": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \\n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential. Public information and sensitization campaigns will have a strong influence on the success of the entire DDR programme (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR). \\n\\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \\n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm. \\n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures. \\n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant. \\n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction). \\n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). \\n Manage expectations. \\n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country. \\n\\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins. Awareness-raising campaigns shall take into consideration the findings of gender analysis in the design and implementation of programme activities. DDR practitioners shall ensure representation of all genders and ages in the campaign; engage youth, women and women\u2019s groups; and mitigate against the risk of linking gender identities with weapons, reinforcing violent masculinities and other gender stereotypes. Media and awareness activities are critical channels to counter the socially constructed yet enduring associations between small arms, protection, power and masculinity. \\n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion. If destruction of ammunition is planned, it is also important to inform communities beforehand to avoid misunderstandings and unnecessary tensions. Finally, during ongoing operations, details on progress towards the objectives of the disarmament programme should be disseminated to help reassure stakeholders and communities that the number of illicit weapons in circulation is being reduced, and that overall security is improving.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential. Public information and sensitization campaigns will have a strong influence on the success of the entire DDR programme (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR). \n\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm. \n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures. \n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant. \n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction). \n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). \n Manage expectations. \n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country. \n\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins. Awareness-raising campaigns shall take into consideration the findings of gender analysis in the design and implementation of programme activities. DDR practitioners shall ensure representation of all genders and ages in the campaign; engage youth, women and women\u2019s groups; and mitigate against the risk of linking gender identities with weapons, reinforcing violent masculinities and other gender stereotypes. Media and awareness activities are critical channels to counter the socially constructed yet enduring associations between small arms, protection, power and masculinity. \n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion. If destruction of ammunition is planned, it is also important to inform communities beforehand to avoid misunderstandings and unnecessary tensions. Finally, during ongoing operations, details on progress towards the objectives of the disarmament programme should be disseminated to help reassure stakeholders and communities that the number of illicit weapons in circulation is being reduced, and that overall security is improving.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -71418,14 +71418,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.5 Eligibility criteria for access to DDR programmes", "Heading3": "5.5.1 Weapons-related eligibility criteria", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins.", + "Sentence": "\n\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins.", "newParagraph": "box 4 disarmament awareness activity n weapon successfully removed early ongoing information sensitization armed force group well affected community planned collection process essential public information sensitization campaign strong influence success entire ddr programme see iddrs 460 public information strategic communication support ddr nn addition direct contact armed force group community representative range medium including radio print medium tv social medium used n encourage combatant person associated armed force group disarm n inform armed force group location date disarmament explain procedure including security measure n explain happen collected arm ammunition absence legal repercussion relevant n explain eligibility criterion entering ddr programme provide information potential alternative noneligible individual see iddrs 230 community violence reduction n explain legal implication including amnesty assurance nonprosecution see iddrs 211 legal framework un ddr n manage expectation n distinguish voluntary disarmament armed force group part ddr programme prior forced disarmament past ongoing forced disarmament country nn professional genderresponsive ageappropriate ddr awareness campaign weapon collection component ddr programme conducted well collection phase begin awarenessraising campaign shall take consideration finding gender analysis design implementation programme activity ddr practitioner shall ensure representation gender age campaign engage youth woman woman group mitigate risk linking gender identity weapon reinforcing violent masculinity gender stereotype medium awareness activity critical channel counter socially constructed yet enduring association small arm protection power masculinity n key local community made aware ongoing disarmament operation presence movement armed individual create confusion destruction ammunition planned also important inform community beforehand avoid misunderstanding unnecessary tension finally ongoing operation detail progress towards objective disarmament programme disseminated help reassure stakeholder community number illicit weapon circulation reduced overall security improving", "ProcessedSent": "nn professional genderresponsive ageappropriate ddr awareness campaign weapon collection component ddr programme conducted well collection phase begin", "SentID": 3967 }, { "ParagraphID": 1268, - "Paragraph": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \\n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential. Public information and sensitization campaigns will have a strong influence on the success of the entire DDR programme (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR). \\n\\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \\n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm. \\n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures. \\n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant. \\n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction). \\n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). \\n Manage expectations. \\n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country. \\n\\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins. Awareness-raising campaigns shall take into consideration the findings of gender analysis in the design and implementation of programme activities. DDR practitioners shall ensure representation of all genders and ages in the campaign; engage youth, women and women\u2019s groups; and mitigate against the risk of linking gender identities with weapons, reinforcing violent masculinities and other gender stereotypes. Media and awareness activities are critical channels to counter the socially constructed yet enduring associations between small arms, protection, power and masculinity. \\n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion. If destruction of ammunition is planned, it is also important to inform communities beforehand to avoid misunderstandings and unnecessary tensions. Finally, during ongoing operations, details on progress towards the objectives of the disarmament programme should be disseminated to help reassure stakeholders and communities that the number of illicit weapons in circulation is being reduced, and that overall security is improving.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential. Public information and sensitization campaigns will have a strong influence on the success of the entire DDR programme (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR). \n\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm. \n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures. \n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant. \n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction). \n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). \n Manage expectations. \n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country. \n\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins. Awareness-raising campaigns shall take into consideration the findings of gender analysis in the design and implementation of programme activities. DDR practitioners shall ensure representation of all genders and ages in the campaign; engage youth, women and women\u2019s groups; and mitigate against the risk of linking gender identities with weapons, reinforcing violent masculinities and other gender stereotypes. Media and awareness activities are critical channels to counter the socially constructed yet enduring associations between small arms, protection, power and masculinity. \n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion. If destruction of ammunition is planned, it is also important to inform communities beforehand to avoid misunderstandings and unnecessary tensions. Finally, during ongoing operations, details on progress towards the objectives of the disarmament programme should be disseminated to help reassure stakeholders and communities that the number of illicit weapons in circulation is being reduced, and that overall security is improving.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -71443,7 +71443,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1268, - "Paragraph": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \\n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential. Public information and sensitization campaigns will have a strong influence on the success of the entire DDR programme (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR). \\n\\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \\n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm. \\n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures. \\n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant. \\n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction). \\n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). \\n Manage expectations. \\n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country. \\n\\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins. Awareness-raising campaigns shall take into consideration the findings of gender analysis in the design and implementation of programme activities. DDR practitioners shall ensure representation of all genders and ages in the campaign; engage youth, women and women\u2019s groups; and mitigate against the risk of linking gender identities with weapons, reinforcing violent masculinities and other gender stereotypes. Media and awareness activities are critical channels to counter the socially constructed yet enduring associations between small arms, protection, power and masculinity. \\n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion. If destruction of ammunition is planned, it is also important to inform communities beforehand to avoid misunderstandings and unnecessary tensions. Finally, during ongoing operations, details on progress towards the objectives of the disarmament programme should be disseminated to help reassure stakeholders and communities that the number of illicit weapons in circulation is being reduced, and that overall security is improving.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential. Public information and sensitization campaigns will have a strong influence on the success of the entire DDR programme (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR). \n\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm. \n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures. \n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant. \n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction). \n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). \n Manage expectations. \n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country. \n\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins. Awareness-raising campaigns shall take into consideration the findings of gender analysis in the design and implementation of programme activities. DDR practitioners shall ensure representation of all genders and ages in the campaign; engage youth, women and women\u2019s groups; and mitigate against the risk of linking gender identities with weapons, reinforcing violent masculinities and other gender stereotypes. Media and awareness activities are critical channels to counter the socially constructed yet enduring associations between small arms, protection, power and masculinity. \n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion. If destruction of ammunition is planned, it is also important to inform communities beforehand to avoid misunderstandings and unnecessary tensions. Finally, during ongoing operations, details on progress towards the objectives of the disarmament programme should be disseminated to help reassure stakeholders and communities that the number of illicit weapons in circulation is being reduced, and that overall security is improving.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -71461,7 +71461,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1268, - "Paragraph": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \\n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential. Public information and sensitization campaigns will have a strong influence on the success of the entire DDR programme (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR). \\n\\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \\n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm. \\n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures. \\n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant. \\n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction). \\n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). \\n Manage expectations. \\n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country. \\n\\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins. Awareness-raising campaigns shall take into consideration the findings of gender analysis in the design and implementation of programme activities. DDR practitioners shall ensure representation of all genders and ages in the campaign; engage youth, women and women\u2019s groups; and mitigate against the risk of linking gender identities with weapons, reinforcing violent masculinities and other gender stereotypes. Media and awareness activities are critical channels to counter the socially constructed yet enduring associations between small arms, protection, power and masculinity. \\n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion. If destruction of ammunition is planned, it is also important to inform communities beforehand to avoid misunderstandings and unnecessary tensions. Finally, during ongoing operations, details on progress towards the objectives of the disarmament programme should be disseminated to help reassure stakeholders and communities that the number of illicit weapons in circulation is being reduced, and that overall security is improving.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential. Public information and sensitization campaigns will have a strong influence on the success of the entire DDR programme (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR). \n\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm. \n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures. \n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant. \n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction). \n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). \n Manage expectations. \n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country. \n\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins. Awareness-raising campaigns shall take into consideration the findings of gender analysis in the design and implementation of programme activities. DDR practitioners shall ensure representation of all genders and ages in the campaign; engage youth, women and women\u2019s groups; and mitigate against the risk of linking gender identities with weapons, reinforcing violent masculinities and other gender stereotypes. Media and awareness activities are critical channels to counter the socially constructed yet enduring associations between small arms, protection, power and masculinity. \n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion. If destruction of ammunition is planned, it is also important to inform communities beforehand to avoid misunderstandings and unnecessary tensions. Finally, during ongoing operations, details on progress towards the objectives of the disarmament programme should be disseminated to help reassure stakeholders and communities that the number of illicit weapons in circulation is being reduced, and that overall security is improving.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -71479,7 +71479,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1268, - "Paragraph": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \\n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential. Public information and sensitization campaigns will have a strong influence on the success of the entire DDR programme (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR). \\n\\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \\n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm. \\n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures. \\n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant. \\n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction). \\n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). \\n Manage expectations. \\n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country. \\n\\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins. Awareness-raising campaigns shall take into consideration the findings of gender analysis in the design and implementation of programme activities. DDR practitioners shall ensure representation of all genders and ages in the campaign; engage youth, women and women\u2019s groups; and mitigate against the risk of linking gender identities with weapons, reinforcing violent masculinities and other gender stereotypes. Media and awareness activities are critical channels to counter the socially constructed yet enduring associations between small arms, protection, power and masculinity. \\n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion. If destruction of ammunition is planned, it is also important to inform communities beforehand to avoid misunderstandings and unnecessary tensions. Finally, during ongoing operations, details on progress towards the objectives of the disarmament programme should be disseminated to help reassure stakeholders and communities that the number of illicit weapons in circulation is being reduced, and that overall security is improving.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential. Public information and sensitization campaigns will have a strong influence on the success of the entire DDR programme (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR). \n\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm. \n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures. \n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant. \n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction). \n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). \n Manage expectations. \n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country. \n\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins. Awareness-raising campaigns shall take into consideration the findings of gender analysis in the design and implementation of programme activities. DDR practitioners shall ensure representation of all genders and ages in the campaign; engage youth, women and women\u2019s groups; and mitigate against the risk of linking gender identities with weapons, reinforcing violent masculinities and other gender stereotypes. Media and awareness activities are critical channels to counter the socially constructed yet enduring associations between small arms, protection, power and masculinity. \n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion. If destruction of ammunition is planned, it is also important to inform communities beforehand to avoid misunderstandings and unnecessary tensions. Finally, during ongoing operations, details on progress towards the objectives of the disarmament programme should be disseminated to help reassure stakeholders and communities that the number of illicit weapons in circulation is being reduced, and that overall security is improving.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -71490,14 +71490,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.5 Eligibility criteria for access to DDR programmes", "Heading3": "5.5.1 Weapons-related eligibility criteria", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion.", + "Sentence": "\n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion.", "newParagraph": "box 4 disarmament awareness activity n weapon successfully removed early ongoing information sensitization armed force group well affected community planned collection process essential public information sensitization campaign strong influence success entire ddr programme see iddrs 460 public information strategic communication support ddr nn addition direct contact armed force group community representative range medium including radio print medium tv social medium used n encourage combatant person associated armed force group disarm n inform armed force group location date disarmament explain procedure including security measure n explain happen collected arm ammunition absence legal repercussion relevant n explain eligibility criterion entering ddr programme provide information potential alternative noneligible individual see iddrs 230 community violence reduction n explain legal implication including amnesty assurance nonprosecution see iddrs 211 legal framework un ddr n manage expectation n distinguish voluntary disarmament armed force group part ddr programme prior forced disarmament past ongoing forced disarmament country nn professional genderresponsive ageappropriate ddr awareness campaign weapon collection component ddr programme conducted well collection phase begin awarenessraising campaign shall take consideration finding gender analysis design implementation programme activity ddr practitioner shall ensure representation gender age campaign engage youth woman woman group mitigate risk linking gender identity weapon reinforcing violent masculinity gender stereotype medium awareness activity critical channel counter socially constructed yet enduring association small arm protection power masculinity n key local community made aware ongoing disarmament operation presence movement armed individual create confusion destruction ammunition planned also important inform community beforehand avoid misunderstanding unnecessary tension finally ongoing operation detail progress towards objective disarmament programme disseminated help reassure stakeholder community number illicit weapon circulation reduced overall security improving", "ProcessedSent": "n key local community made aware ongoing disarmament operation presence movement armed individual create confusion", "SentID": 3971 }, { "ParagraphID": 1268, - "Paragraph": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \\n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential. Public information and sensitization campaigns will have a strong influence on the success of the entire DDR programme (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR). \\n\\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \\n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm. \\n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures. \\n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant. \\n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction). \\n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). \\n Manage expectations. \\n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country. \\n\\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins. Awareness-raising campaigns shall take into consideration the findings of gender analysis in the design and implementation of programme activities. DDR practitioners shall ensure representation of all genders and ages in the campaign; engage youth, women and women\u2019s groups; and mitigate against the risk of linking gender identities with weapons, reinforcing violent masculinities and other gender stereotypes. Media and awareness activities are critical channels to counter the socially constructed yet enduring associations between small arms, protection, power and masculinity. \\n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion. If destruction of ammunition is planned, it is also important to inform communities beforehand to avoid misunderstandings and unnecessary tensions. Finally, during ongoing operations, details on progress towards the objectives of the disarmament programme should be disseminated to help reassure stakeholders and communities that the number of illicit weapons in circulation is being reduced, and that overall security is improving.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential. Public information and sensitization campaigns will have a strong influence on the success of the entire DDR programme (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR). \n\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm. \n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures. \n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant. \n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction). \n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). \n Manage expectations. \n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country. \n\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins. Awareness-raising campaigns shall take into consideration the findings of gender analysis in the design and implementation of programme activities. DDR practitioners shall ensure representation of all genders and ages in the campaign; engage youth, women and women\u2019s groups; and mitigate against the risk of linking gender identities with weapons, reinforcing violent masculinities and other gender stereotypes. Media and awareness activities are critical channels to counter the socially constructed yet enduring associations between small arms, protection, power and masculinity. \n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion. If destruction of ammunition is planned, it is also important to inform communities beforehand to avoid misunderstandings and unnecessary tensions. Finally, during ongoing operations, details on progress towards the objectives of the disarmament programme should be disseminated to help reassure stakeholders and communities that the number of illicit weapons in circulation is being reduced, and that overall security is improving.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -71515,7 +71515,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1268, - "Paragraph": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \\n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential. Public information and sensitization campaigns will have a strong influence on the success of the entire DDR programme (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR). \\n\\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \\n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm. \\n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures. \\n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant. \\n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction). \\n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). \\n Manage expectations. \\n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country. \\n\\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins. Awareness-raising campaigns shall take into consideration the findings of gender analysis in the design and implementation of programme activities. DDR practitioners shall ensure representation of all genders and ages in the campaign; engage youth, women and women\u2019s groups; and mitigate against the risk of linking gender identities with weapons, reinforcing violent masculinities and other gender stereotypes. Media and awareness activities are critical channels to counter the socially constructed yet enduring associations between small arms, protection, power and masculinity. \\n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion. If destruction of ammunition is planned, it is also important to inform communities beforehand to avoid misunderstandings and unnecessary tensions. Finally, during ongoing operations, details on progress towards the objectives of the disarmament programme should be disseminated to help reassure stakeholders and communities that the number of illicit weapons in circulation is being reduced, and that overall security is improving.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 4: DISARMAMENT AWARENESS ACTIVITIES \n For weapons to be successfully removed, the early and ongoing information and sensitization of armed forces and groups \u2013 as well as affected communities \u2013 to the planned collection process is essential. Public information and sensitization campaigns will have a strong influence on the success of the entire DDR programme (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR). \n\n In addition to direct contact with armed forces and groups and community representatives, a range of media \u2013 including radio, print media, TV and social media \u2013 can be used to: \n Encourage combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups to disarm. \n Inform armed forces and groups about locations and dates of disarmament and explain procedures, including security measures. \n Explain what will happen to collected arms and ammunition and the absence of legal repercussions, as relevant. \n Explain the eligibility criteria for entering a DDR programme and provide information about potential alternatives for non-eligible individuals (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction). \n Explain legal implications, including amnesties or assurances of non-prosecution (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR). \n Manage expectations. \n Distinguish between the voluntary disarmament of armed forces and groups as part of a DDR programme and prior forced disarmament and any past or ongoing forced disarmament in the country. \n\n A professional, gender-responsive and age-appropriate DDR awareness campaign for the weapons collection component of any DDR programme should be conducted well before the collection phase begins. Awareness-raising campaigns shall take into consideration the findings of gender analysis in the design and implementation of programme activities. DDR practitioners shall ensure representation of all genders and ages in the campaign; engage youth, women and women\u2019s groups; and mitigate against the risk of linking gender identities with weapons, reinforcing violent masculinities and other gender stereotypes. Media and awareness activities are critical channels to counter the socially constructed yet enduring associations between small arms, protection, power and masculinity. \n It is key that local communities be made aware of ongoing disarmament operations so that the presence or movement of armed individuals does not create confusion. If destruction of ammunition is planned, it is also important to inform communities beforehand to avoid misunderstandings and unnecessary tensions. Finally, during ongoing operations, details on progress towards the objectives of the disarmament programme should be disseminated to help reassure stakeholders and communities that the number of illicit weapons in circulation is being reduced, and that overall security is improving.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -71749,7 +71749,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1274, - "Paragraph": "While some missions and\/or national authorities have developed a single disarmament SOP, others have preferred a set of SOPs. Regardless, SOPs should cover the following procedures: \\n Reception of arms and\/or ammunition and explosives in static or mobile disarmament; \\n Compliance with weapons- and ammunition-related eligibility criteria (e.g., what is considered a serviceable weapon?); \\n Weapons storage management; \\n Ammunition and explosives storage management; \\n Accounting for weapons and ammunition; \\n Transportation of weapons; \\n Transportation of ammunition; \\n Storage checks; \\n Reporting and investigating loss or theft; \\n Destruction of weapons (or other appropriate methods of disposal and potential marking); \\n Destruction of ammunition (or other appropriate methods of disposal). \\n Managing spontaneous disarmament, including in advance of a formal DDR process.", + "Paragraph": "While some missions and\/or national authorities have developed a single disarmament SOP, others have preferred a set of SOPs. Regardless, SOPs should cover the following procedures: \n Reception of arms and\/or ammunition and explosives in static or mobile disarmament; \n Compliance with weapons- and ammunition-related eligibility criteria (e.g., what is considered a serviceable weapon?); \n Weapons storage management; \n Ammunition and explosives storage management; \n Accounting for weapons and ammunition; \n Transportation of weapons; \n Transportation of ammunition; \n Storage checks; \n Reporting and investigating loss or theft; \n Destruction of weapons (or other appropriate methods of disposal and potential marking); \n Destruction of ammunition (or other appropriate methods of disposal). \n Managing spontaneous disarmament, including in advance of a formal DDR process.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -71767,7 +71767,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1274, - "Paragraph": "While some missions and\/or national authorities have developed a single disarmament SOP, others have preferred a set of SOPs. Regardless, SOPs should cover the following procedures: \\n Reception of arms and\/or ammunition and explosives in static or mobile disarmament; \\n Compliance with weapons- and ammunition-related eligibility criteria (e.g., what is considered a serviceable weapon?); \\n Weapons storage management; \\n Ammunition and explosives storage management; \\n Accounting for weapons and ammunition; \\n Transportation of weapons; \\n Transportation of ammunition; \\n Storage checks; \\n Reporting and investigating loss or theft; \\n Destruction of weapons (or other appropriate methods of disposal and potential marking); \\n Destruction of ammunition (or other appropriate methods of disposal). \\n Managing spontaneous disarmament, including in advance of a formal DDR process.", + "Paragraph": "While some missions and\/or national authorities have developed a single disarmament SOP, others have preferred a set of SOPs. Regardless, SOPs should cover the following procedures: \n Reception of arms and\/or ammunition and explosives in static or mobile disarmament; \n Compliance with weapons- and ammunition-related eligibility criteria (e.g., what is considered a serviceable weapon?); \n Weapons storage management; \n Ammunition and explosives storage management; \n Accounting for weapons and ammunition; \n Transportation of weapons; \n Transportation of ammunition; \n Storage checks; \n Reporting and investigating loss or theft; \n Destruction of weapons (or other appropriate methods of disposal and potential marking); \n Destruction of ammunition (or other appropriate methods of disposal). \n Managing spontaneous disarmament, including in advance of a formal DDR process.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -71778,14 +71778,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.6 Standard operating procedures", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Regardless, SOPs should cover the following procedures: \\n Reception of arms and\/or ammunition and explosives in static or mobile disarmament; \\n Compliance with weapons- and ammunition-related eligibility criteria (e.g., what is considered a serviceable weapon?", + "Sentence": "Regardless, SOPs should cover the following procedures: \n Reception of arms and\/or ammunition and explosives in static or mobile disarmament; \n Compliance with weapons- and ammunition-related eligibility criteria (e.g., what is considered a serviceable weapon?", "newParagraph": "mission andor national authority developed single disarmament sop others preferred set sop regardless sop cover following procedure n reception arm andor ammunition explosive static mobile disarmament n compliance weapon ammunitionrelated eligibility criterion eg considered serviceable weapon n weapon storage management n ammunition explosive storage management n accounting weapon ammunition n transportation weapon n transportation ammunition n storage check n reporting investigating loss theft n destruction weapon appropriate method disposal potential marking n destruction ammunition appropriate method disposal n managing spontaneous disarmament including advance formal ddr process", "ProcessedSent": "regardless sop cover following procedure n reception arm andor ammunition explosive static mobile disarmament n compliance weapon ammunitionrelated eligibility criterion eg considered serviceable weapon", "SentID": 3987 }, { "ParagraphID": 1274, - "Paragraph": "While some missions and\/or national authorities have developed a single disarmament SOP, others have preferred a set of SOPs. Regardless, SOPs should cover the following procedures: \\n Reception of arms and\/or ammunition and explosives in static or mobile disarmament; \\n Compliance with weapons- and ammunition-related eligibility criteria (e.g., what is considered a serviceable weapon?); \\n Weapons storage management; \\n Ammunition and explosives storage management; \\n Accounting for weapons and ammunition; \\n Transportation of weapons; \\n Transportation of ammunition; \\n Storage checks; \\n Reporting and investigating loss or theft; \\n Destruction of weapons (or other appropriate methods of disposal and potential marking); \\n Destruction of ammunition (or other appropriate methods of disposal). \\n Managing spontaneous disarmament, including in advance of a formal DDR process.", + "Paragraph": "While some missions and\/or national authorities have developed a single disarmament SOP, others have preferred a set of SOPs. Regardless, SOPs should cover the following procedures: \n Reception of arms and\/or ammunition and explosives in static or mobile disarmament; \n Compliance with weapons- and ammunition-related eligibility criteria (e.g., what is considered a serviceable weapon?); \n Weapons storage management; \n Ammunition and explosives storage management; \n Accounting for weapons and ammunition; \n Transportation of weapons; \n Transportation of ammunition; \n Storage checks; \n Reporting and investigating loss or theft; \n Destruction of weapons (or other appropriate methods of disposal and potential marking); \n Destruction of ammunition (or other appropriate methods of disposal). \n Managing spontaneous disarmament, including in advance of a formal DDR process.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -71796,14 +71796,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.6 Standard operating procedures", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "); \\n Weapons storage management; \\n Ammunition and explosives storage management; \\n Accounting for weapons and ammunition; \\n Transportation of weapons; \\n Transportation of ammunition; \\n Storage checks; \\n Reporting and investigating loss or theft; \\n Destruction of weapons (or other appropriate methods of disposal and potential marking); \\n Destruction of ammunition (or other appropriate methods of disposal).", + "Sentence": "); \n Weapons storage management; \n Ammunition and explosives storage management; \n Accounting for weapons and ammunition; \n Transportation of weapons; \n Transportation of ammunition; \n Storage checks; \n Reporting and investigating loss or theft; \n Destruction of weapons (or other appropriate methods of disposal and potential marking); \n Destruction of ammunition (or other appropriate methods of disposal).", "newParagraph": "mission andor national authority developed single disarmament sop others preferred set sop regardless sop cover following procedure n reception arm andor ammunition explosive static mobile disarmament n compliance weapon ammunitionrelated eligibility criterion eg considered serviceable weapon n weapon storage management n ammunition explosive storage management n accounting weapon ammunition n transportation weapon n transportation ammunition n storage check n reporting investigating loss theft n destruction weapon appropriate method disposal potential marking n destruction ammunition appropriate method disposal n managing spontaneous disarmament including advance formal ddr process", "ProcessedSent": " n weapon storage management n ammunition explosive storage management n accounting weapon ammunition n transportation weapon n transportation ammunition n storage check n reporting investigating loss theft n destruction weapon appropriate method disposal potential marking n destruction ammunition appropriate method disposal", "SentID": 3988 }, { "ParagraphID": 1274, - "Paragraph": "While some missions and\/or national authorities have developed a single disarmament SOP, others have preferred a set of SOPs. Regardless, SOPs should cover the following procedures: \\n Reception of arms and\/or ammunition and explosives in static or mobile disarmament; \\n Compliance with weapons- and ammunition-related eligibility criteria (e.g., what is considered a serviceable weapon?); \\n Weapons storage management; \\n Ammunition and explosives storage management; \\n Accounting for weapons and ammunition; \\n Transportation of weapons; \\n Transportation of ammunition; \\n Storage checks; \\n Reporting and investigating loss or theft; \\n Destruction of weapons (or other appropriate methods of disposal and potential marking); \\n Destruction of ammunition (or other appropriate methods of disposal). \\n Managing spontaneous disarmament, including in advance of a formal DDR process.", + "Paragraph": "While some missions and\/or national authorities have developed a single disarmament SOP, others have preferred a set of SOPs. Regardless, SOPs should cover the following procedures: \n Reception of arms and\/or ammunition and explosives in static or mobile disarmament; \n Compliance with weapons- and ammunition-related eligibility criteria (e.g., what is considered a serviceable weapon?); \n Weapons storage management; \n Ammunition and explosives storage management; \n Accounting for weapons and ammunition; \n Transportation of weapons; \n Transportation of ammunition; \n Storage checks; \n Reporting and investigating loss or theft; \n Destruction of weapons (or other appropriate methods of disposal and potential marking); \n Destruction of ammunition (or other appropriate methods of disposal). \n Managing spontaneous disarmament, including in advance of a formal DDR process.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -71814,7 +71814,7 @@ "Heading2": "5.6 Standard operating procedures", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Managing spontaneous disarmament, including in advance of a formal DDR process.", + "Sentence": "\n Managing spontaneous disarmament, including in advance of a formal DDR process.", "newParagraph": "mission andor national authority developed single disarmament sop others preferred set sop regardless sop cover following procedure n reception arm andor ammunition explosive static mobile disarmament n compliance weapon ammunitionrelated eligibility criterion eg considered serviceable weapon n weapon storage management n ammunition explosive storage management n accounting weapon ammunition n transportation weapon n transportation ammunition n storage check n reporting investigating loss theft n destruction weapon appropriate method disposal potential marking n destruction ammunition appropriate method disposal n managing spontaneous disarmament including advance formal ddr process", "ProcessedSent": "n managing spontaneous disarmament including advance formal ddr process", "SentID": 3989 @@ -71875,7 +71875,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1277, - "Paragraph": "BOX 5: WAM ADVISERS \\n In both mission and non-mission settings, the involvement of UN WAM advisers in the planning and implementation of disarmament operations and WAM is critical to the success of the programme. Depending on the type of activities involved, WAM advisers shall have extensive formal training and operational field experience in ammunition and weapons storage, inspection, transportation and destruction\/disposal, including in fragile settings, as well as experience in the development and administration of new storage facilities. If the DDR component does not include such profiles among its staff, it may rely on support from other specialist UN agencies or NGOs. The WAM adviser shall, among other things, advise on explosive safety, certify that ammunition and explosives are safe to move, identify a nearby demolition site for unsafe ammunition, conduct render-safe procedures on unsafe ammunition, and determine safety distances during collection processes.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 5: WAM ADVISERS \n In both mission and non-mission settings, the involvement of UN WAM advisers in the planning and implementation of disarmament operations and WAM is critical to the success of the programme. Depending on the type of activities involved, WAM advisers shall have extensive formal training and operational field experience in ammunition and weapons storage, inspection, transportation and destruction\/disposal, including in fragile settings, as well as experience in the development and administration of new storage facilities. If the DDR component does not include such profiles among its staff, it may rely on support from other specialist UN agencies or NGOs. The WAM adviser shall, among other things, advise on explosive safety, certify that ammunition and explosives are safe to move, identify a nearby demolition site for unsafe ammunition, conduct render-safe procedures on unsafe ammunition, and determine safety distances during collection processes.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -71886,14 +71886,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.7 Disarmament team structure", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "BOX 5: WAM ADVISERS \\n In both mission and non-mission settings, the involvement of UN WAM advisers in the planning and implementation of disarmament operations and WAM is critical to the success of the programme.", + "Sentence": "BOX 5: WAM ADVISERS \n In both mission and non-mission settings, the involvement of UN WAM advisers in the planning and implementation of disarmament operations and WAM is critical to the success of the programme.", "newParagraph": "box 5 wam adviser n mission nonmission setting involvement un wam adviser planning implementation disarmament operation wam critical success programme depending type activity involved wam adviser shall extensive formal training operational field experience ammunition weapon storage inspection transportation destructiondisposal including fragile setting well experience development administration new storage facility ddr component include profile among staff may rely support specialist un agency ngo wam adviser shall among thing advise explosive safety certify ammunition explosive safe move identify nearby demolition site unsafe ammunition conduct rendersafe procedure unsafe ammunition determine safety distance collection process", "ProcessedSent": "box 5 wam adviser n mission nonmission setting involvement un wam adviser planning implementation disarmament operation wam critical success programme", "SentID": 3993 }, { "ParagraphID": 1277, - "Paragraph": "BOX 5: WAM ADVISERS \\n In both mission and non-mission settings, the involvement of UN WAM advisers in the planning and implementation of disarmament operations and WAM is critical to the success of the programme. Depending on the type of activities involved, WAM advisers shall have extensive formal training and operational field experience in ammunition and weapons storage, inspection, transportation and destruction\/disposal, including in fragile settings, as well as experience in the development and administration of new storage facilities. If the DDR component does not include such profiles among its staff, it may rely on support from other specialist UN agencies or NGOs. The WAM adviser shall, among other things, advise on explosive safety, certify that ammunition and explosives are safe to move, identify a nearby demolition site for unsafe ammunition, conduct render-safe procedures on unsafe ammunition, and determine safety distances during collection processes.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 5: WAM ADVISERS \n In both mission and non-mission settings, the involvement of UN WAM advisers in the planning and implementation of disarmament operations and WAM is critical to the success of the programme. Depending on the type of activities involved, WAM advisers shall have extensive formal training and operational field experience in ammunition and weapons storage, inspection, transportation and destruction\/disposal, including in fragile settings, as well as experience in the development and administration of new storage facilities. If the DDR component does not include such profiles among its staff, it may rely on support from other specialist UN agencies or NGOs. The WAM adviser shall, among other things, advise on explosive safety, certify that ammunition and explosives are safe to move, identify a nearby demolition site for unsafe ammunition, conduct render-safe procedures on unsafe ammunition, and determine safety distances during collection processes.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -71911,7 +71911,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1277, - "Paragraph": "BOX 5: WAM ADVISERS \\n In both mission and non-mission settings, the involvement of UN WAM advisers in the planning and implementation of disarmament operations and WAM is critical to the success of the programme. Depending on the type of activities involved, WAM advisers shall have extensive formal training and operational field experience in ammunition and weapons storage, inspection, transportation and destruction\/disposal, including in fragile settings, as well as experience in the development and administration of new storage facilities. If the DDR component does not include such profiles among its staff, it may rely on support from other specialist UN agencies or NGOs. The WAM adviser shall, among other things, advise on explosive safety, certify that ammunition and explosives are safe to move, identify a nearby demolition site for unsafe ammunition, conduct render-safe procedures on unsafe ammunition, and determine safety distances during collection processes.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 5: WAM ADVISERS \n In both mission and non-mission settings, the involvement of UN WAM advisers in the planning and implementation of disarmament operations and WAM is critical to the success of the programme. Depending on the type of activities involved, WAM advisers shall have extensive formal training and operational field experience in ammunition and weapons storage, inspection, transportation and destruction\/disposal, including in fragile settings, as well as experience in the development and administration of new storage facilities. If the DDR component does not include such profiles among its staff, it may rely on support from other specialist UN agencies or NGOs. The WAM adviser shall, among other things, advise on explosive safety, certify that ammunition and explosives are safe to move, identify a nearby demolition site for unsafe ammunition, conduct render-safe procedures on unsafe ammunition, and determine safety distances during collection processes.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -71929,7 +71929,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1277, - "Paragraph": "BOX 5: WAM ADVISERS \\n In both mission and non-mission settings, the involvement of UN WAM advisers in the planning and implementation of disarmament operations and WAM is critical to the success of the programme. Depending on the type of activities involved, WAM advisers shall have extensive formal training and operational field experience in ammunition and weapons storage, inspection, transportation and destruction\/disposal, including in fragile settings, as well as experience in the development and administration of new storage facilities. If the DDR component does not include such profiles among its staff, it may rely on support from other specialist UN agencies or NGOs. The WAM adviser shall, among other things, advise on explosive safety, certify that ammunition and explosives are safe to move, identify a nearby demolition site for unsafe ammunition, conduct render-safe procedures on unsafe ammunition, and determine safety distances during collection processes.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 5: WAM ADVISERS \n In both mission and non-mission settings, the involvement of UN WAM advisers in the planning and implementation of disarmament operations and WAM is critical to the success of the programme. Depending on the type of activities involved, WAM advisers shall have extensive formal training and operational field experience in ammunition and weapons storage, inspection, transportation and destruction\/disposal, including in fragile settings, as well as experience in the development and administration of new storage facilities. If the DDR component does not include such profiles among its staff, it may rely on support from other specialist UN agencies or NGOs. The WAM adviser shall, among other things, advise on explosive safety, certify that ammunition and explosives are safe to move, identify a nearby demolition site for unsafe ammunition, conduct render-safe procedures on unsafe ammunition, and determine safety distances during collection processes.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -71947,7 +71947,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1278, - "Paragraph": "A disarmament team should include a gender-balanced composition of: \\n DDR practitioners; \\n A representative of the national DDR commission (and potentially other national institutions); \\n An adequately sized technical support team from a specialized UN agency or NGO, including a team leader\/WAM adviser (IMAS EOD level 3), two weapons inspectors to identify weapons and assess safety of items, registration officers, storemen\/women and a medic; \\n Military observers (MILOBs) and representatives from the protection force; \\n National security forces armament specialists (police, army and\/or gendarmerie); \\n A representative from the mission\u2019s department for child protection; \\n A national gender specialist. \\n A national youth specialist.", + "Paragraph": "A disarmament team should include a gender-balanced composition of: \n DDR practitioners; \n A representative of the national DDR commission (and potentially other national institutions); \n An adequately sized technical support team from a specialized UN agency or NGO, including a team leader\/WAM adviser (IMAS EOD level 3), two weapons inspectors to identify weapons and assess safety of items, registration officers, storemen\/women and a medic; \n Military observers (MILOBs) and representatives from the protection force; \n National security forces armament specialists (police, army and\/or gendarmerie); \n A representative from the mission\u2019s department for child protection; \n A national gender specialist. \n A national youth specialist.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -71958,14 +71958,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.7 Disarmament team structure", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "A disarmament team should include a gender-balanced composition of: \\n DDR practitioners; \\n A representative of the national DDR commission (and potentially other national institutions); \\n An adequately sized technical support team from a specialized UN agency or NGO, including a team leader\/WAM adviser (IMAS EOD level 3), two weapons inspectors to identify weapons and assess safety of items, registration officers, storemen\/women and a medic; \\n Military observers (MILOBs) and representatives from the protection force; \\n National security forces armament specialists (police, army and\/or gendarmerie); \\n A representative from the mission\u2019s department for child protection; \\n A national gender specialist.", + "Sentence": "A disarmament team should include a gender-balanced composition of: \n DDR practitioners; \n A representative of the national DDR commission (and potentially other national institutions); \n An adequately sized technical support team from a specialized UN agency or NGO, including a team leader\/WAM adviser (IMAS EOD level 3), two weapons inspectors to identify weapons and assess safety of items, registration officers, storemen\/women and a medic; \n Military observers (MILOBs) and representatives from the protection force; \n National security forces armament specialists (police, army and\/or gendarmerie); \n A representative from the mission\u2019s department for child protection; \n A national gender specialist.", "newParagraph": "disarmament team include genderbalanced composition n ddr practitioner n representative national ddr commission potentially national institution n adequately sized technical support team specialized un agency ngo including team leaderwam adviser imas eod level 3 two weapon inspector identify weapon ass safety item registration officer storemenwomen medic n military observer milobs representative protection force n national security force armament specialist police army andor gendarmerie n representative mission department child protection n national gender specialist n national youth specialist", "ProcessedSent": "disarmament team include genderbalanced composition n ddr practitioner n representative national ddr commission potentially national institution n adequately sized technical support team specialized un agency ngo including team leaderwam adviser imas eod level 3 two weapon inspector identify weapon ass safety item registration officer storemenwomen medic n military observer milobs representative protection force n national security force armament specialist police army andor gendarmerie n representative mission department child protection n national gender specialist", "SentID": 3997 }, { "ParagraphID": 1278, - "Paragraph": "A disarmament team should include a gender-balanced composition of: \\n DDR practitioners; \\n A representative of the national DDR commission (and potentially other national institutions); \\n An adequately sized technical support team from a specialized UN agency or NGO, including a team leader\/WAM adviser (IMAS EOD level 3), two weapons inspectors to identify weapons and assess safety of items, registration officers, storemen\/women and a medic; \\n Military observers (MILOBs) and representatives from the protection force; \\n National security forces armament specialists (police, army and\/or gendarmerie); \\n A representative from the mission\u2019s department for child protection; \\n A national gender specialist. \\n A national youth specialist.", + "Paragraph": "A disarmament team should include a gender-balanced composition of: \n DDR practitioners; \n A representative of the national DDR commission (and potentially other national institutions); \n An adequately sized technical support team from a specialized UN agency or NGO, including a team leader\/WAM adviser (IMAS EOD level 3), two weapons inspectors to identify weapons and assess safety of items, registration officers, storemen\/women and a medic; \n Military observers (MILOBs) and representatives from the protection force; \n National security forces armament specialists (police, army and\/or gendarmerie); \n A representative from the mission\u2019s department for child protection; \n A national gender specialist. \n A national youth specialist.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -71976,7 +71976,7 @@ "Heading2": "5.7 Disarmament team structure", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n A national youth specialist.", + "Sentence": "\n A national youth specialist.", "newParagraph": "disarmament team include genderbalanced composition n ddr practitioner n representative national ddr commission potentially national institution n adequately sized technical support team specialized un agency ngo including team leaderwam adviser imas eod level 3 two weapon inspector identify weapon ass safety item registration officer storemenwomen medic n military observer milobs representative protection force n national security force armament specialist police army andor gendarmerie n representative mission department child protection n national gender specialist n national youth specialist", "ProcessedSent": "n national youth specialist", "SentID": 3998 @@ -72127,7 +72127,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1282, - "Paragraph": "Timelines for the implementation of the disarmament component of a DDR programme should be developed by taking the following factors into account: \\n The provisions of the peace agreement or the ceasefire agreement; \\n The availability of accurate information about demographics, including sex and age, as well as the size of the armed forces and groups to be disarmed; \\n The location of the armed forces\u2019 and groups\u2019 units and the number, type and location of their weapons; \\n The nature, processing capacity and location of mobile and static disarmament sites; \\n The time it takes to process each ex-combatant or person formerly associated with an armed force or group (this could be anywhere from 15 to 20 minutes per person). The simulation exercise will help to determine how long individual weapons collection and accounting will take.", + "Paragraph": "Timelines for the implementation of the disarmament component of a DDR programme should be developed by taking the following factors into account: \n The provisions of the peace agreement or the ceasefire agreement; \n The availability of accurate information about demographics, including sex and age, as well as the size of the armed forces and groups to be disarmed; \n The location of the armed forces\u2019 and groups\u2019 units and the number, type and location of their weapons; \n The nature, processing capacity and location of mobile and static disarmament sites; \n The time it takes to process each ex-combatant or person formerly associated with an armed force or group (this could be anywhere from 15 to 20 minutes per person). The simulation exercise will help to determine how long individual weapons collection and accounting will take.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -72138,14 +72138,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.8 Timelines for disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Timelines for the implementation of the disarmament component of a DDR programme should be developed by taking the following factors into account: \\n The provisions of the peace agreement or the ceasefire agreement; \\n The availability of accurate information about demographics, including sex and age, as well as the size of the armed forces and groups to be disarmed; \\n The location of the armed forces\u2019 and groups\u2019 units and the number, type and location of their weapons; \\n The nature, processing capacity and location of mobile and static disarmament sites; \\n The time it takes to process each ex-combatant or person formerly associated with an armed force or group (this could be anywhere from 15 to 20 minutes per person).", + "Sentence": "Timelines for the implementation of the disarmament component of a DDR programme should be developed by taking the following factors into account: \n The provisions of the peace agreement or the ceasefire agreement; \n The availability of accurate information about demographics, including sex and age, as well as the size of the armed forces and groups to be disarmed; \n The location of the armed forces\u2019 and groups\u2019 units and the number, type and location of their weapons; \n The nature, processing capacity and location of mobile and static disarmament sites; \n The time it takes to process each ex-combatant or person formerly associated with an armed force or group (this could be anywhere from 15 to 20 minutes per person).", "newParagraph": "timeline implementation disarmament component ddr programme developed taking following factor account n provision peace agreement ceasefire agreement n availability accurate information demographic including sex age well size armed force group disarmed n location armed force group unit number type location weapon n nature processing capacity location mobile static disarmament site n time take process excombatant person formerly associated armed force group could anywhere 15 20 minute per person simulation exercise help determine long individual weapon collection accounting take", "ProcessedSent": "timeline implementation disarmament component ddr programme developed taking following factor account n provision peace agreement ceasefire agreement n availability accurate information demographic including sex age well size armed force group disarmed n location armed force group unit number type location weapon n nature processing capacity location mobile static disarmament site n time take process excombatant person formerly associated armed force group could anywhere 15 20 minute per person", "SentID": 4007 }, { "ParagraphID": 1282, - "Paragraph": "Timelines for the implementation of the disarmament component of a DDR programme should be developed by taking the following factors into account: \\n The provisions of the peace agreement or the ceasefire agreement; \\n The availability of accurate information about demographics, including sex and age, as well as the size of the armed forces and groups to be disarmed; \\n The location of the armed forces\u2019 and groups\u2019 units and the number, type and location of their weapons; \\n The nature, processing capacity and location of mobile and static disarmament sites; \\n The time it takes to process each ex-combatant or person formerly associated with an armed force or group (this could be anywhere from 15 to 20 minutes per person). The simulation exercise will help to determine how long individual weapons collection and accounting will take.", + "Paragraph": "Timelines for the implementation of the disarmament component of a DDR programme should be developed by taking the following factors into account: \n The provisions of the peace agreement or the ceasefire agreement; \n The availability of accurate information about demographics, including sex and age, as well as the size of the armed forces and groups to be disarmed; \n The location of the armed forces\u2019 and groups\u2019 units and the number, type and location of their weapons; \n The nature, processing capacity and location of mobile and static disarmament sites; \n The time it takes to process each ex-combatant or person formerly associated with an armed force or group (this could be anywhere from 15 to 20 minutes per person). The simulation exercise will help to determine how long individual weapons collection and accounting will take.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -72379,7 +72379,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1287, - "Paragraph": "The selection of the approach, or combination of approaches, to take should be based on the following: \\n Findings from the integrated assessment and weapons survey, including a review of previous approaches to disarmament (see section 5.1); \\n Discussions and strategic planning by the national authorities; \\n Exchanges with leaders of armed forces and groups; \\n The security and risk assessment; \\n Gender analysis; \\n Financial resources.", + "Paragraph": "The selection of the approach, or combination of approaches, to take should be based on the following: \n Findings from the integrated assessment and weapons survey, including a review of previous approaches to disarmament (see section 5.1); \n Discussions and strategic planning by the national authorities; \n Exchanges with leaders of armed forces and groups; \n The security and risk assessment; \n Gender analysis; \n Financial resources.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -72390,14 +72390,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Disarmament locations", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The selection of the approach, or combination of approaches, to take should be based on the following: \\n Findings from the integrated assessment and weapons survey, including a review of previous approaches to disarmament (see section 5.1); \\n Discussions and strategic planning by the national authorities; \\n Exchanges with leaders of armed forces and groups; \\n The security and risk assessment; \\n Gender analysis; \\n Financial resources.", + "Sentence": "The selection of the approach, or combination of approaches, to take should be based on the following: \n Findings from the integrated assessment and weapons survey, including a review of previous approaches to disarmament (see section 5.1); \n Discussions and strategic planning by the national authorities; \n Exchanges with leaders of armed forces and groups; \n The security and risk assessment; \n Gender analysis; \n Financial resources.", "newParagraph": "selection approach combination approach take based following n finding integrated assessment weapon survey including review previous approach disarmament see section 51 n discussion strategic planning national authority n exchange leader armed force group n security risk assessment n gender analysis n financial resource", "ProcessedSent": "selection approach combination approach take based following n finding integrated assessment weapon survey including review previous approach disarmament see section 51 n discussion strategic planning national authority n exchange leader armed force group n security risk assessment n gender analysis n financial resource", "SentID": 4021 }, { "ParagraphID": 1288, - "Paragraph": "Notwithstanding the selection of the specific disarmament approach, all combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups should be informed of: \\n The time and date to report, and the location to which to report; \\n Appropriate weapons and ammunition safety measures; \\n The activities involved and steps they will be asked to follow; \\n The level of UN or military security to expect on arrival.", + "Paragraph": "Notwithstanding the selection of the specific disarmament approach, all combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups should be informed of: \n The time and date to report, and the location to which to report; \n Appropriate weapons and ammunition safety measures; \n The activities involved and steps they will be asked to follow; \n The level of UN or military security to expect on arrival.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -72408,7 +72408,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Disarmament locations", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Notwithstanding the selection of the specific disarmament approach, all combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups should be informed of: \\n The time and date to report, and the location to which to report; \\n Appropriate weapons and ammunition safety measures; \\n The activities involved and steps they will be asked to follow; \\n The level of UN or military security to expect on arrival.", + "Sentence": "Notwithstanding the selection of the specific disarmament approach, all combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups should be informed of: \n The time and date to report, and the location to which to report; \n Appropriate weapons and ammunition safety measures; \n The activities involved and steps they will be asked to follow; \n The level of UN or military security to expect on arrival.", "newParagraph": "notwithstanding selection specific disarmament approach combatant person associated armed force group informed n time date report location report n appropriate weapon ammunition safety measure n activity involved step asked follow n level un military security expect arrival", "ProcessedSent": "notwithstanding selection specific disarmament approach combatant person associated armed force group informed n time date report location report n appropriate weapon ammunition safety measure n activity involved step asked follow n level un military security expect arrival", "SentID": 4022 @@ -72811,7 +72811,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1296, - "Paragraph": "The following activities should occur at the PUP: \\n Members of the disarmament team meet combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups outside the PUP at clearly marked waiting areas; personnel deliver a PUP briefing, explaining what will happen at the sites. \\n Qualified personnel check that weapons are clear of ammunition and made safe, ensuring that magazines are removed; combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups are screened to identify those carrying ammunition and explosives. These individuals should be immediately moved to the ammunition area in the disarmament site. \\n Qualified personnel conduct a clothing and baggage search of all combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups; men and women should be searched separately by those of the same sex. \\n Combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups with eligible weapons and safe ammunition pass through the screening area to the transport area, before moving to the disarmament site. The UN shall be responsible for ensuring the protection and physical security of combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups during their movement from the PUP. In non-mission settings, the national security forces, joint commissions or teams would be responsible for the above-mentioned tasks with technical support from relevant UN agency (ies), multilateral and bilateral partners.", + "Paragraph": "The following activities should occur at the PUP: \n Members of the disarmament team meet combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups outside the PUP at clearly marked waiting areas; personnel deliver a PUP briefing, explaining what will happen at the sites. \n Qualified personnel check that weapons are clear of ammunition and made safe, ensuring that magazines are removed; combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups are screened to identify those carrying ammunition and explosives. These individuals should be immediately moved to the ammunition area in the disarmament site. \n Qualified personnel conduct a clothing and baggage search of all combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups; men and women should be searched separately by those of the same sex. \n Combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups with eligible weapons and safe ammunition pass through the screening area to the transport area, before moving to the disarmament site. The UN shall be responsible for ensuring the protection and physical security of combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups during their movement from the PUP. In non-mission settings, the national security forces, joint commissions or teams would be responsible for the above-mentioned tasks with technical support from relevant UN agency (ies), multilateral and bilateral partners.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -72822,14 +72822,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Disarmament locations", "Heading3": "6.1.1. Static disarmament ", "Heading4": "6.1.1.1 Pick-up points", - "Sentence": "The following activities should occur at the PUP: \\n Members of the disarmament team meet combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups outside the PUP at clearly marked waiting areas; personnel deliver a PUP briefing, explaining what will happen at the sites.", + "Sentence": "The following activities should occur at the PUP: \n Members of the disarmament team meet combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups outside the PUP at clearly marked waiting areas; personnel deliver a PUP briefing, explaining what will happen at the sites.", "newParagraph": "following activity occur pup n member disarmament team meet combatant person associated armed force group outside pup clearly marked waiting area personnel deliver pup briefing explaining happen site n qualified personnel check weapon clear ammunition made safe ensuring magazine removed combatant person associated armed force group screened identify carrying ammunition explosive individual immediately moved ammunition area disarmament site n qualified personnel conduct clothing baggage search combatant person associated armed force group men woman searched separately sex n combatant person associated armed force group eligible weapon safe ammunition pas screening area transport area moving disarmament site un shall responsible ensuring protection physical security combatant person associated armed force group movement pup nonmission setting national security force joint commission team would responsible abovementioned task technical support relevant un agency y multilateral bilateral partner", "ProcessedSent": "following activity occur pup n member disarmament team meet combatant person associated armed force group outside pup clearly marked waiting area personnel deliver pup briefing explaining happen site", "SentID": 4045 }, { "ParagraphID": 1296, - "Paragraph": "The following activities should occur at the PUP: \\n Members of the disarmament team meet combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups outside the PUP at clearly marked waiting areas; personnel deliver a PUP briefing, explaining what will happen at the sites. \\n Qualified personnel check that weapons are clear of ammunition and made safe, ensuring that magazines are removed; combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups are screened to identify those carrying ammunition and explosives. These individuals should be immediately moved to the ammunition area in the disarmament site. \\n Qualified personnel conduct a clothing and baggage search of all combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups; men and women should be searched separately by those of the same sex. \\n Combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups with eligible weapons and safe ammunition pass through the screening area to the transport area, before moving to the disarmament site. The UN shall be responsible for ensuring the protection and physical security of combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups during their movement from the PUP. In non-mission settings, the national security forces, joint commissions or teams would be responsible for the above-mentioned tasks with technical support from relevant UN agency (ies), multilateral and bilateral partners.", + "Paragraph": "The following activities should occur at the PUP: \n Members of the disarmament team meet combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups outside the PUP at clearly marked waiting areas; personnel deliver a PUP briefing, explaining what will happen at the sites. \n Qualified personnel check that weapons are clear of ammunition and made safe, ensuring that magazines are removed; combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups are screened to identify those carrying ammunition and explosives. These individuals should be immediately moved to the ammunition area in the disarmament site. \n Qualified personnel conduct a clothing and baggage search of all combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups; men and women should be searched separately by those of the same sex. \n Combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups with eligible weapons and safe ammunition pass through the screening area to the transport area, before moving to the disarmament site. The UN shall be responsible for ensuring the protection and physical security of combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups during their movement from the PUP. In non-mission settings, the national security forces, joint commissions or teams would be responsible for the above-mentioned tasks with technical support from relevant UN agency (ies), multilateral and bilateral partners.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -72840,14 +72840,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Disarmament locations", "Heading3": "6.1.1. Static disarmament ", "Heading4": "6.1.1.1 Pick-up points", - "Sentence": "\\n Qualified personnel check that weapons are clear of ammunition and made safe, ensuring that magazines are removed; combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups are screened to identify those carrying ammunition and explosives.", + "Sentence": "\n Qualified personnel check that weapons are clear of ammunition and made safe, ensuring that magazines are removed; combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups are screened to identify those carrying ammunition and explosives.", "newParagraph": "following activity occur pup n member disarmament team meet combatant person associated armed force group outside pup clearly marked waiting area personnel deliver pup briefing explaining happen site n qualified personnel check weapon clear ammunition made safe ensuring magazine removed combatant person associated armed force group screened identify carrying ammunition explosive individual immediately moved ammunition area disarmament site n qualified personnel conduct clothing baggage search combatant person associated armed force group men woman searched separately sex n combatant person associated armed force group eligible weapon safe ammunition pas screening area transport area moving disarmament site un shall responsible ensuring protection physical security combatant person associated armed force group movement pup nonmission setting national security force joint commission team would responsible abovementioned task technical support relevant un agency y multilateral bilateral partner", "ProcessedSent": "n qualified personnel check weapon clear ammunition made safe ensuring magazine removed combatant person associated armed force group screened identify carrying ammunition explosive", "SentID": 4046 }, { "ParagraphID": 1296, - "Paragraph": "The following activities should occur at the PUP: \\n Members of the disarmament team meet combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups outside the PUP at clearly marked waiting areas; personnel deliver a PUP briefing, explaining what will happen at the sites. \\n Qualified personnel check that weapons are clear of ammunition and made safe, ensuring that magazines are removed; combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups are screened to identify those carrying ammunition and explosives. These individuals should be immediately moved to the ammunition area in the disarmament site. \\n Qualified personnel conduct a clothing and baggage search of all combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups; men and women should be searched separately by those of the same sex. \\n Combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups with eligible weapons and safe ammunition pass through the screening area to the transport area, before moving to the disarmament site. The UN shall be responsible for ensuring the protection and physical security of combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups during their movement from the PUP. In non-mission settings, the national security forces, joint commissions or teams would be responsible for the above-mentioned tasks with technical support from relevant UN agency (ies), multilateral and bilateral partners.", + "Paragraph": "The following activities should occur at the PUP: \n Members of the disarmament team meet combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups outside the PUP at clearly marked waiting areas; personnel deliver a PUP briefing, explaining what will happen at the sites. \n Qualified personnel check that weapons are clear of ammunition and made safe, ensuring that magazines are removed; combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups are screened to identify those carrying ammunition and explosives. These individuals should be immediately moved to the ammunition area in the disarmament site. \n Qualified personnel conduct a clothing and baggage search of all combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups; men and women should be searched separately by those of the same sex. \n Combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups with eligible weapons and safe ammunition pass through the screening area to the transport area, before moving to the disarmament site. The UN shall be responsible for ensuring the protection and physical security of combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups during their movement from the PUP. In non-mission settings, the national security forces, joint commissions or teams would be responsible for the above-mentioned tasks with technical support from relevant UN agency (ies), multilateral and bilateral partners.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -72865,7 +72865,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1296, - "Paragraph": "The following activities should occur at the PUP: \\n Members of the disarmament team meet combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups outside the PUP at clearly marked waiting areas; personnel deliver a PUP briefing, explaining what will happen at the sites. \\n Qualified personnel check that weapons are clear of ammunition and made safe, ensuring that magazines are removed; combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups are screened to identify those carrying ammunition and explosives. These individuals should be immediately moved to the ammunition area in the disarmament site. \\n Qualified personnel conduct a clothing and baggage search of all combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups; men and women should be searched separately by those of the same sex. \\n Combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups with eligible weapons and safe ammunition pass through the screening area to the transport area, before moving to the disarmament site. The UN shall be responsible for ensuring the protection and physical security of combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups during their movement from the PUP. In non-mission settings, the national security forces, joint commissions or teams would be responsible for the above-mentioned tasks with technical support from relevant UN agency (ies), multilateral and bilateral partners.", + "Paragraph": "The following activities should occur at the PUP: \n Members of the disarmament team meet combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups outside the PUP at clearly marked waiting areas; personnel deliver a PUP briefing, explaining what will happen at the sites. \n Qualified personnel check that weapons are clear of ammunition and made safe, ensuring that magazines are removed; combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups are screened to identify those carrying ammunition and explosives. These individuals should be immediately moved to the ammunition area in the disarmament site. \n Qualified personnel conduct a clothing and baggage search of all combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups; men and women should be searched separately by those of the same sex. \n Combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups with eligible weapons and safe ammunition pass through the screening area to the transport area, before moving to the disarmament site. The UN shall be responsible for ensuring the protection and physical security of combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups during their movement from the PUP. In non-mission settings, the national security forces, joint commissions or teams would be responsible for the above-mentioned tasks with technical support from relevant UN agency (ies), multilateral and bilateral partners.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -72876,14 +72876,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Disarmament locations", "Heading3": "6.1.1. Static disarmament ", "Heading4": "6.1.1.1 Pick-up points", - "Sentence": "\\n Qualified personnel conduct a clothing and baggage search of all combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups; men and women should be searched separately by those of the same sex.", + "Sentence": "\n Qualified personnel conduct a clothing and baggage search of all combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups; men and women should be searched separately by those of the same sex.", "newParagraph": "following activity occur pup n member disarmament team meet combatant person associated armed force group outside pup clearly marked waiting area personnel deliver pup briefing explaining happen site n qualified personnel check weapon clear ammunition made safe ensuring magazine removed combatant person associated armed force group screened identify carrying ammunition explosive individual immediately moved ammunition area disarmament site n qualified personnel conduct clothing baggage search combatant person associated armed force group men woman searched separately sex n combatant person associated armed force group eligible weapon safe ammunition pas screening area transport area moving disarmament site un shall responsible ensuring protection physical security combatant person associated armed force group movement pup nonmission setting national security force joint commission team would responsible abovementioned task technical support relevant un agency y multilateral bilateral partner", "ProcessedSent": "n qualified personnel conduct clothing baggage search combatant person associated armed force group men woman searched separately sex", "SentID": 4048 }, { "ParagraphID": 1296, - "Paragraph": "The following activities should occur at the PUP: \\n Members of the disarmament team meet combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups outside the PUP at clearly marked waiting areas; personnel deliver a PUP briefing, explaining what will happen at the sites. \\n Qualified personnel check that weapons are clear of ammunition and made safe, ensuring that magazines are removed; combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups are screened to identify those carrying ammunition and explosives. These individuals should be immediately moved to the ammunition area in the disarmament site. \\n Qualified personnel conduct a clothing and baggage search of all combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups; men and women should be searched separately by those of the same sex. \\n Combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups with eligible weapons and safe ammunition pass through the screening area to the transport area, before moving to the disarmament site. The UN shall be responsible for ensuring the protection and physical security of combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups during their movement from the PUP. In non-mission settings, the national security forces, joint commissions or teams would be responsible for the above-mentioned tasks with technical support from relevant UN agency (ies), multilateral and bilateral partners.", + "Paragraph": "The following activities should occur at the PUP: \n Members of the disarmament team meet combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups outside the PUP at clearly marked waiting areas; personnel deliver a PUP briefing, explaining what will happen at the sites. \n Qualified personnel check that weapons are clear of ammunition and made safe, ensuring that magazines are removed; combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups are screened to identify those carrying ammunition and explosives. These individuals should be immediately moved to the ammunition area in the disarmament site. \n Qualified personnel conduct a clothing and baggage search of all combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups; men and women should be searched separately by those of the same sex. \n Combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups with eligible weapons and safe ammunition pass through the screening area to the transport area, before moving to the disarmament site. The UN shall be responsible for ensuring the protection and physical security of combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups during their movement from the PUP. In non-mission settings, the national security forces, joint commissions or teams would be responsible for the above-mentioned tasks with technical support from relevant UN agency (ies), multilateral and bilateral partners.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -72894,14 +72894,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Disarmament locations", "Heading3": "6.1.1. Static disarmament ", "Heading4": "6.1.1.1 Pick-up points", - "Sentence": "\\n Combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups with eligible weapons and safe ammunition pass through the screening area to the transport area, before moving to the disarmament site.", + "Sentence": "\n Combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups with eligible weapons and safe ammunition pass through the screening area to the transport area, before moving to the disarmament site.", "newParagraph": "following activity occur pup n member disarmament team meet combatant person associated armed force group outside pup clearly marked waiting area personnel deliver pup briefing explaining happen site n qualified personnel check weapon clear ammunition made safe ensuring magazine removed combatant person associated armed force group screened identify carrying ammunition explosive individual immediately moved ammunition area disarmament site n qualified personnel conduct clothing baggage search combatant person associated armed force group men woman searched separately sex n combatant person associated armed force group eligible weapon safe ammunition pas screening area transport area moving disarmament site un shall responsible ensuring protection physical security combatant person associated armed force group movement pup nonmission setting national security force joint commission team would responsible abovementioned task technical support relevant un agency y multilateral bilateral partner", "ProcessedSent": "n combatant person associated armed force group eligible weapon safe ammunition pas screening area transport area moving disarmament site", "SentID": 4049 }, { "ParagraphID": 1296, - "Paragraph": "The following activities should occur at the PUP: \\n Members of the disarmament team meet combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups outside the PUP at clearly marked waiting areas; personnel deliver a PUP briefing, explaining what will happen at the sites. \\n Qualified personnel check that weapons are clear of ammunition and made safe, ensuring that magazines are removed; combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups are screened to identify those carrying ammunition and explosives. These individuals should be immediately moved to the ammunition area in the disarmament site. \\n Qualified personnel conduct a clothing and baggage search of all combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups; men and women should be searched separately by those of the same sex. \\n Combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups with eligible weapons and safe ammunition pass through the screening area to the transport area, before moving to the disarmament site. The UN shall be responsible for ensuring the protection and physical security of combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups during their movement from the PUP. In non-mission settings, the national security forces, joint commissions or teams would be responsible for the above-mentioned tasks with technical support from relevant UN agency (ies), multilateral and bilateral partners.", + "Paragraph": "The following activities should occur at the PUP: \n Members of the disarmament team meet combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups outside the PUP at clearly marked waiting areas; personnel deliver a PUP briefing, explaining what will happen at the sites. \n Qualified personnel check that weapons are clear of ammunition and made safe, ensuring that magazines are removed; combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups are screened to identify those carrying ammunition and explosives. These individuals should be immediately moved to the ammunition area in the disarmament site. \n Qualified personnel conduct a clothing and baggage search of all combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups; men and women should be searched separately by those of the same sex. \n Combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups with eligible weapons and safe ammunition pass through the screening area to the transport area, before moving to the disarmament site. The UN shall be responsible for ensuring the protection and physical security of combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups during their movement from the PUP. In non-mission settings, the national security forces, joint commissions or teams would be responsible for the above-mentioned tasks with technical support from relevant UN agency (ies), multilateral and bilateral partners.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -72919,7 +72919,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1296, - "Paragraph": "The following activities should occur at the PUP: \\n Members of the disarmament team meet combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups outside the PUP at clearly marked waiting areas; personnel deliver a PUP briefing, explaining what will happen at the sites. \\n Qualified personnel check that weapons are clear of ammunition and made safe, ensuring that magazines are removed; combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups are screened to identify those carrying ammunition and explosives. These individuals should be immediately moved to the ammunition area in the disarmament site. \\n Qualified personnel conduct a clothing and baggage search of all combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups; men and women should be searched separately by those of the same sex. \\n Combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups with eligible weapons and safe ammunition pass through the screening area to the transport area, before moving to the disarmament site. The UN shall be responsible for ensuring the protection and physical security of combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups during their movement from the PUP. In non-mission settings, the national security forces, joint commissions or teams would be responsible for the above-mentioned tasks with technical support from relevant UN agency (ies), multilateral and bilateral partners.", + "Paragraph": "The following activities should occur at the PUP: \n Members of the disarmament team meet combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups outside the PUP at clearly marked waiting areas; personnel deliver a PUP briefing, explaining what will happen at the sites. \n Qualified personnel check that weapons are clear of ammunition and made safe, ensuring that magazines are removed; combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups are screened to identify those carrying ammunition and explosives. These individuals should be immediately moved to the ammunition area in the disarmament site. \n Qualified personnel conduct a clothing and baggage search of all combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups; men and women should be searched separately by those of the same sex. \n Combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups with eligible weapons and safe ammunition pass through the screening area to the transport area, before moving to the disarmament site. The UN shall be responsible for ensuring the protection and physical security of combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups during their movement from the PUP. In non-mission settings, the national security forces, joint commissions or teams would be responsible for the above-mentioned tasks with technical support from relevant UN agency (ies), multilateral and bilateral partners.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -73207,7 +73207,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1301, - "Paragraph": "Before entering the disarmament site perimeter: \\n The individual is identified by his\/her commander and physically checked by the designated security officials. Special measures will be required for children (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR). Men and women will be checked by those of the same sex, which requires having both male and female officers among UN military\/DDR staff in mission settings and national security\/DDR staff in non-mission settings. \\n If the individual is carrying ammunition or explosives that might present a threat, she\/he will be asked to leave it outside the handover area, in a location identified by a WAM\/EOD specialist, to be handled separately. \\n The individual is asked to move with the weapon pointing towards the ground, the catch in safety position (if relevant) and her\/his finger off the trigger.", + "Paragraph": "Before entering the disarmament site perimeter: \n The individual is identified by his\/her commander and physically checked by the designated security officials. Special measures will be required for children (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR). Men and women will be checked by those of the same sex, which requires having both male and female officers among UN military\/DDR staff in mission settings and national security\/DDR staff in non-mission settings. \n If the individual is carrying ammunition or explosives that might present a threat, she\/he will be asked to leave it outside the handover area, in a location identified by a WAM\/EOD specialist, to be handled separately. \n The individual is asked to move with the weapon pointing towards the ground, the catch in safety position (if relevant) and her\/his finger off the trigger.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -73218,14 +73218,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.2 Procedures for disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Before entering the disarmament site perimeter: \\n The individual is identified by his\/her commander and physically checked by the designated security officials.", + "Sentence": "Before entering the disarmament site perimeter: \n The individual is identified by his\/her commander and physically checked by the designated security officials.", "newParagraph": "entering disarmament site perimeter n individual identified hisher commander physically checked designated security official special measure required child see iddrs 520 child ddr men woman checked sex requires male female officer among un militaryddr staff mission setting national securityddr staff nonmission setting n individual carrying ammunition explosive might present threat shehe asked leave outside handover area location identified wameod specialist handled separately n individual asked move weapon pointing towards ground catch safety position relevant herhis finger trigger", "ProcessedSent": "entering disarmament site perimeter n individual identified hisher commander physically checked designated security official", "SentID": 4067 }, { "ParagraphID": 1301, - "Paragraph": "Before entering the disarmament site perimeter: \\n The individual is identified by his\/her commander and physically checked by the designated security officials. Special measures will be required for children (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR). Men and women will be checked by those of the same sex, which requires having both male and female officers among UN military\/DDR staff in mission settings and national security\/DDR staff in non-mission settings. \\n If the individual is carrying ammunition or explosives that might present a threat, she\/he will be asked to leave it outside the handover area, in a location identified by a WAM\/EOD specialist, to be handled separately. \\n The individual is asked to move with the weapon pointing towards the ground, the catch in safety position (if relevant) and her\/his finger off the trigger.", + "Paragraph": "Before entering the disarmament site perimeter: \n The individual is identified by his\/her commander and physically checked by the designated security officials. Special measures will be required for children (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR). Men and women will be checked by those of the same sex, which requires having both male and female officers among UN military\/DDR staff in mission settings and national security\/DDR staff in non-mission settings. \n If the individual is carrying ammunition or explosives that might present a threat, she\/he will be asked to leave it outside the handover area, in a location identified by a WAM\/EOD specialist, to be handled separately. \n The individual is asked to move with the weapon pointing towards the ground, the catch in safety position (if relevant) and her\/his finger off the trigger.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -73243,7 +73243,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1301, - "Paragraph": "Before entering the disarmament site perimeter: \\n The individual is identified by his\/her commander and physically checked by the designated security officials. Special measures will be required for children (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR). Men and women will be checked by those of the same sex, which requires having both male and female officers among UN military\/DDR staff in mission settings and national security\/DDR staff in non-mission settings. \\n If the individual is carrying ammunition or explosives that might present a threat, she\/he will be asked to leave it outside the handover area, in a location identified by a WAM\/EOD specialist, to be handled separately. \\n The individual is asked to move with the weapon pointing towards the ground, the catch in safety position (if relevant) and her\/his finger off the trigger.", + "Paragraph": "Before entering the disarmament site perimeter: \n The individual is identified by his\/her commander and physically checked by the designated security officials. Special measures will be required for children (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR). Men and women will be checked by those of the same sex, which requires having both male and female officers among UN military\/DDR staff in mission settings and national security\/DDR staff in non-mission settings. \n If the individual is carrying ammunition or explosives that might present a threat, she\/he will be asked to leave it outside the handover area, in a location identified by a WAM\/EOD specialist, to be handled separately. \n The individual is asked to move with the weapon pointing towards the ground, the catch in safety position (if relevant) and her\/his finger off the trigger.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -73261,7 +73261,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1301, - "Paragraph": "Before entering the disarmament site perimeter: \\n The individual is identified by his\/her commander and physically checked by the designated security officials. Special measures will be required for children (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR). Men and women will be checked by those of the same sex, which requires having both male and female officers among UN military\/DDR staff in mission settings and national security\/DDR staff in non-mission settings. \\n If the individual is carrying ammunition or explosives that might present a threat, she\/he will be asked to leave it outside the handover area, in a location identified by a WAM\/EOD specialist, to be handled separately. \\n The individual is asked to move with the weapon pointing towards the ground, the catch in safety position (if relevant) and her\/his finger off the trigger.", + "Paragraph": "Before entering the disarmament site perimeter: \n The individual is identified by his\/her commander and physically checked by the designated security officials. Special measures will be required for children (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR). Men and women will be checked by those of the same sex, which requires having both male and female officers among UN military\/DDR staff in mission settings and national security\/DDR staff in non-mission settings. \n If the individual is carrying ammunition or explosives that might present a threat, she\/he will be asked to leave it outside the handover area, in a location identified by a WAM\/EOD specialist, to be handled separately. \n The individual is asked to move with the weapon pointing towards the ground, the catch in safety position (if relevant) and her\/his finger off the trigger.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -73272,14 +73272,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.2 Procedures for disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n If the individual is carrying ammunition or explosives that might present a threat, she\/he will be asked to leave it outside the handover area, in a location identified by a WAM\/EOD specialist, to be handled separately.", + "Sentence": "\n If the individual is carrying ammunition or explosives that might present a threat, she\/he will be asked to leave it outside the handover area, in a location identified by a WAM\/EOD specialist, to be handled separately.", "newParagraph": "entering disarmament site perimeter n individual identified hisher commander physically checked designated security official special measure required child see iddrs 520 child ddr men woman checked sex requires male female officer among un militaryddr staff mission setting national securityddr staff nonmission setting n individual carrying ammunition explosive might present threat shehe asked leave outside handover area location identified wameod specialist handled separately n individual asked move weapon pointing towards ground catch safety position relevant herhis finger trigger", "ProcessedSent": "n individual carrying ammunition explosive might present threat shehe asked leave outside handover area location identified wameod specialist handled separately", "SentID": 4070 }, { "ParagraphID": 1301, - "Paragraph": "Before entering the disarmament site perimeter: \\n The individual is identified by his\/her commander and physically checked by the designated security officials. Special measures will be required for children (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR). Men and women will be checked by those of the same sex, which requires having both male and female officers among UN military\/DDR staff in mission settings and national security\/DDR staff in non-mission settings. \\n If the individual is carrying ammunition or explosives that might present a threat, she\/he will be asked to leave it outside the handover area, in a location identified by a WAM\/EOD specialist, to be handled separately. \\n The individual is asked to move with the weapon pointing towards the ground, the catch in safety position (if relevant) and her\/his finger off the trigger.", + "Paragraph": "Before entering the disarmament site perimeter: \n The individual is identified by his\/her commander and physically checked by the designated security officials. Special measures will be required for children (see IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR). Men and women will be checked by those of the same sex, which requires having both male and female officers among UN military\/DDR staff in mission settings and national security\/DDR staff in non-mission settings. \n If the individual is carrying ammunition or explosives that might present a threat, she\/he will be asked to leave it outside the handover area, in a location identified by a WAM\/EOD specialist, to be handled separately. \n The individual is asked to move with the weapon pointing towards the ground, the catch in safety position (if relevant) and her\/his finger off the trigger.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -73290,14 +73290,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.2 Procedures for disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The individual is asked to move with the weapon pointing towards the ground, the catch in safety position (if relevant) and her\/his finger off the trigger.", + "Sentence": "\n The individual is asked to move with the weapon pointing towards the ground, the catch in safety position (if relevant) and her\/his finger off the trigger.", "newParagraph": "entering disarmament site perimeter n individual identified hisher commander physically checked designated security official special measure required child see iddrs 520 child ddr men woman checked sex requires male female officer among un militaryddr staff mission setting national securityddr staff nonmission setting n individual carrying ammunition explosive might present threat shehe asked leave outside handover area location identified wameod specialist handled separately n individual asked move weapon pointing towards ground catch safety position relevant herhis finger trigger", "ProcessedSent": "n individual asked move weapon pointing towards ground catch safety position relevant herhis finger trigger", "SentID": 4071 }, { "ParagraphID": 1302, - "Paragraph": "After entering the perimeter: \\n The individual is directed to the unloading bay, where she\/he will proceed with the clearing of his\/her weapon under the instruction and supervision of a MILOB or representative of the UN military component in mission settings or designated security official in a non-mission setting. If the individual is under 18 years old, child protection staff shall be present throughout the process. \\n Once the weapon has been cleared, it is handed over to a MILOB or representative of the military component in a mission setting or designated security official in a non-mission setting who will proceed with verification. \\n If the individual is also in possession of ammunition for small arms or machine guns, she\/he will be asked to place it in a separate pre-identified location, away from the weapons. \\n The materiel handed in is recorded by a DDR practitioner with guidance on weapons and ammunition identification from specialist UN agency personnel or other arms specialists along with information on the individual concerned. \\n The individual is provided with a receipt that proves she\/he has handed in a weapon and\/or ammunition. The receipt indicates the name of the individual, the date and location, the type, the status (serviceable or not) and the serial number of the weapon. \\n Weapons are tagged with a code to facilitate storage, management and recordkeeping throughout the disarmament process until disposal (see section 7.1). \\n Weapons and ammunition are stored separately or organized for transportation under the instructions and guidance of a WAM adviser (see section 7.2 and DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11). Ammunition presenting an immediate risk, or deemed unfit for transport, should be destroyed in situ by qualified EOD specialists.", + "Paragraph": "After entering the perimeter: \n The individual is directed to the unloading bay, where she\/he will proceed with the clearing of his\/her weapon under the instruction and supervision of a MILOB or representative of the UN military component in mission settings or designated security official in a non-mission setting. If the individual is under 18 years old, child protection staff shall be present throughout the process. \n Once the weapon has been cleared, it is handed over to a MILOB or representative of the military component in a mission setting or designated security official in a non-mission setting who will proceed with verification. \n If the individual is also in possession of ammunition for small arms or machine guns, she\/he will be asked to place it in a separate pre-identified location, away from the weapons. \n The materiel handed in is recorded by a DDR practitioner with guidance on weapons and ammunition identification from specialist UN agency personnel or other arms specialists along with information on the individual concerned. \n The individual is provided with a receipt that proves she\/he has handed in a weapon and\/or ammunition. The receipt indicates the name of the individual, the date and location, the type, the status (serviceable or not) and the serial number of the weapon. \n Weapons are tagged with a code to facilitate storage, management and recordkeeping throughout the disarmament process until disposal (see section 7.1). \n Weapons and ammunition are stored separately or organized for transportation under the instructions and guidance of a WAM adviser (see section 7.2 and DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11). Ammunition presenting an immediate risk, or deemed unfit for transport, should be destroyed in situ by qualified EOD specialists.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -73308,14 +73308,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.2 Procedures for disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "After entering the perimeter: \\n The individual is directed to the unloading bay, where she\/he will proceed with the clearing of his\/her weapon under the instruction and supervision of a MILOB or representative of the UN military component in mission settings or designated security official in a non-mission setting.", + "Sentence": "After entering the perimeter: \n The individual is directed to the unloading bay, where she\/he will proceed with the clearing of his\/her weapon under the instruction and supervision of a MILOB or representative of the UN military component in mission settings or designated security official in a non-mission setting.", "newParagraph": "entering perimeter n individual directed unloading bay shehe proceed clearing hisher weapon instruction supervision milob representative un military component mission setting designated security official nonmission setting individual 18 year old child protection staff shall present throughout process n weapon cleared handed milob representative military component mission setting designated security official nonmission setting proceed verification n individual also possession ammunition small arm machine gun shehe asked place separate preidentified location away weapon n materiel handed recorded ddr practitioner guidance weapon ammunition identification specialist un agency personnel arm specialist along information individual concerned n individual provided receipt prof shehe handed weapon andor ammunition receipt indicates name individual date location type status serviceable serial number weapon n weapon tagged code facilitate storage management recordkeeping throughout disarmament process disposal see section 71 n weapon ammunition stored separately organized transportation instruction guidance wam adviser see section 72 ddr wam handbook unit 11 ammunition presenting immediate risk deemed unfit transport destroyed situ qualified eod specialist", "ProcessedSent": "entering perimeter n individual directed unloading bay shehe proceed clearing hisher weapon instruction supervision milob representative un military component mission setting designated security official nonmission setting", "SentID": 4072 }, { "ParagraphID": 1302, - "Paragraph": "After entering the perimeter: \\n The individual is directed to the unloading bay, where she\/he will proceed with the clearing of his\/her weapon under the instruction and supervision of a MILOB or representative of the UN military component in mission settings or designated security official in a non-mission setting. If the individual is under 18 years old, child protection staff shall be present throughout the process. \\n Once the weapon has been cleared, it is handed over to a MILOB or representative of the military component in a mission setting or designated security official in a non-mission setting who will proceed with verification. \\n If the individual is also in possession of ammunition for small arms or machine guns, she\/he will be asked to place it in a separate pre-identified location, away from the weapons. \\n The materiel handed in is recorded by a DDR practitioner with guidance on weapons and ammunition identification from specialist UN agency personnel or other arms specialists along with information on the individual concerned. \\n The individual is provided with a receipt that proves she\/he has handed in a weapon and\/or ammunition. The receipt indicates the name of the individual, the date and location, the type, the status (serviceable or not) and the serial number of the weapon. \\n Weapons are tagged with a code to facilitate storage, management and recordkeeping throughout the disarmament process until disposal (see section 7.1). \\n Weapons and ammunition are stored separately or organized for transportation under the instructions and guidance of a WAM adviser (see section 7.2 and DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11). Ammunition presenting an immediate risk, or deemed unfit for transport, should be destroyed in situ by qualified EOD specialists.", + "Paragraph": "After entering the perimeter: \n The individual is directed to the unloading bay, where she\/he will proceed with the clearing of his\/her weapon under the instruction and supervision of a MILOB or representative of the UN military component in mission settings or designated security official in a non-mission setting. If the individual is under 18 years old, child protection staff shall be present throughout the process. \n Once the weapon has been cleared, it is handed over to a MILOB or representative of the military component in a mission setting or designated security official in a non-mission setting who will proceed with verification. \n If the individual is also in possession of ammunition for small arms or machine guns, she\/he will be asked to place it in a separate pre-identified location, away from the weapons. \n The materiel handed in is recorded by a DDR practitioner with guidance on weapons and ammunition identification from specialist UN agency personnel or other arms specialists along with information on the individual concerned. \n The individual is provided with a receipt that proves she\/he has handed in a weapon and\/or ammunition. The receipt indicates the name of the individual, the date and location, the type, the status (serviceable or not) and the serial number of the weapon. \n Weapons are tagged with a code to facilitate storage, management and recordkeeping throughout the disarmament process until disposal (see section 7.1). \n Weapons and ammunition are stored separately or organized for transportation under the instructions and guidance of a WAM adviser (see section 7.2 and DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11). Ammunition presenting an immediate risk, or deemed unfit for transport, should be destroyed in situ by qualified EOD specialists.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -73333,7 +73333,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1302, - "Paragraph": "After entering the perimeter: \\n The individual is directed to the unloading bay, where she\/he will proceed with the clearing of his\/her weapon under the instruction and supervision of a MILOB or representative of the UN military component in mission settings or designated security official in a non-mission setting. If the individual is under 18 years old, child protection staff shall be present throughout the process. \\n Once the weapon has been cleared, it is handed over to a MILOB or representative of the military component in a mission setting or designated security official in a non-mission setting who will proceed with verification. \\n If the individual is also in possession of ammunition for small arms or machine guns, she\/he will be asked to place it in a separate pre-identified location, away from the weapons. \\n The materiel handed in is recorded by a DDR practitioner with guidance on weapons and ammunition identification from specialist UN agency personnel or other arms specialists along with information on the individual concerned. \\n The individual is provided with a receipt that proves she\/he has handed in a weapon and\/or ammunition. The receipt indicates the name of the individual, the date and location, the type, the status (serviceable or not) and the serial number of the weapon. \\n Weapons are tagged with a code to facilitate storage, management and recordkeeping throughout the disarmament process until disposal (see section 7.1). \\n Weapons and ammunition are stored separately or organized for transportation under the instructions and guidance of a WAM adviser (see section 7.2 and DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11). Ammunition presenting an immediate risk, or deemed unfit for transport, should be destroyed in situ by qualified EOD specialists.", + "Paragraph": "After entering the perimeter: \n The individual is directed to the unloading bay, where she\/he will proceed with the clearing of his\/her weapon under the instruction and supervision of a MILOB or representative of the UN military component in mission settings or designated security official in a non-mission setting. If the individual is under 18 years old, child protection staff shall be present throughout the process. \n Once the weapon has been cleared, it is handed over to a MILOB or representative of the military component in a mission setting or designated security official in a non-mission setting who will proceed with verification. \n If the individual is also in possession of ammunition for small arms or machine guns, she\/he will be asked to place it in a separate pre-identified location, away from the weapons. \n The materiel handed in is recorded by a DDR practitioner with guidance on weapons and ammunition identification from specialist UN agency personnel or other arms specialists along with information on the individual concerned. \n The individual is provided with a receipt that proves she\/he has handed in a weapon and\/or ammunition. The receipt indicates the name of the individual, the date and location, the type, the status (serviceable or not) and the serial number of the weapon. \n Weapons are tagged with a code to facilitate storage, management and recordkeeping throughout the disarmament process until disposal (see section 7.1). \n Weapons and ammunition are stored separately or organized for transportation under the instructions and guidance of a WAM adviser (see section 7.2 and DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11). Ammunition presenting an immediate risk, or deemed unfit for transport, should be destroyed in situ by qualified EOD specialists.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -73344,14 +73344,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.2 Procedures for disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Once the weapon has been cleared, it is handed over to a MILOB or representative of the military component in a mission setting or designated security official in a non-mission setting who will proceed with verification.", + "Sentence": "\n Once the weapon has been cleared, it is handed over to a MILOB or representative of the military component in a mission setting or designated security official in a non-mission setting who will proceed with verification.", "newParagraph": "entering perimeter n individual directed unloading bay shehe proceed clearing hisher weapon instruction supervision milob representative un military component mission setting designated security official nonmission setting individual 18 year old child protection staff shall present throughout process n weapon cleared handed milob representative military component mission setting designated security official nonmission setting proceed verification n individual also possession ammunition small arm machine gun shehe asked place separate preidentified location away weapon n materiel handed recorded ddr practitioner guidance weapon ammunition identification specialist un agency personnel arm specialist along information individual concerned n individual provided receipt prof shehe handed weapon andor ammunition receipt indicates name individual date location type status serviceable serial number weapon n weapon tagged code facilitate storage management recordkeeping throughout disarmament process disposal see section 71 n weapon ammunition stored separately organized transportation instruction guidance wam adviser see section 72 ddr wam handbook unit 11 ammunition presenting immediate risk deemed unfit transport destroyed situ qualified eod specialist", "ProcessedSent": "n weapon cleared handed milob representative military component mission setting designated security official nonmission setting proceed verification", "SentID": 4074 }, { "ParagraphID": 1302, - "Paragraph": "After entering the perimeter: \\n The individual is directed to the unloading bay, where she\/he will proceed with the clearing of his\/her weapon under the instruction and supervision of a MILOB or representative of the UN military component in mission settings or designated security official in a non-mission setting. If the individual is under 18 years old, child protection staff shall be present throughout the process. \\n Once the weapon has been cleared, it is handed over to a MILOB or representative of the military component in a mission setting or designated security official in a non-mission setting who will proceed with verification. \\n If the individual is also in possession of ammunition for small arms or machine guns, she\/he will be asked to place it in a separate pre-identified location, away from the weapons. \\n The materiel handed in is recorded by a DDR practitioner with guidance on weapons and ammunition identification from specialist UN agency personnel or other arms specialists along with information on the individual concerned. \\n The individual is provided with a receipt that proves she\/he has handed in a weapon and\/or ammunition. The receipt indicates the name of the individual, the date and location, the type, the status (serviceable or not) and the serial number of the weapon. \\n Weapons are tagged with a code to facilitate storage, management and recordkeeping throughout the disarmament process until disposal (see section 7.1). \\n Weapons and ammunition are stored separately or organized for transportation under the instructions and guidance of a WAM adviser (see section 7.2 and DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11). Ammunition presenting an immediate risk, or deemed unfit for transport, should be destroyed in situ by qualified EOD specialists.", + "Paragraph": "After entering the perimeter: \n The individual is directed to the unloading bay, where she\/he will proceed with the clearing of his\/her weapon under the instruction and supervision of a MILOB or representative of the UN military component in mission settings or designated security official in a non-mission setting. If the individual is under 18 years old, child protection staff shall be present throughout the process. \n Once the weapon has been cleared, it is handed over to a MILOB or representative of the military component in a mission setting or designated security official in a non-mission setting who will proceed with verification. \n If the individual is also in possession of ammunition for small arms or machine guns, she\/he will be asked to place it in a separate pre-identified location, away from the weapons. \n The materiel handed in is recorded by a DDR practitioner with guidance on weapons and ammunition identification from specialist UN agency personnel or other arms specialists along with information on the individual concerned. \n The individual is provided with a receipt that proves she\/he has handed in a weapon and\/or ammunition. The receipt indicates the name of the individual, the date and location, the type, the status (serviceable or not) and the serial number of the weapon. \n Weapons are tagged with a code to facilitate storage, management and recordkeeping throughout the disarmament process until disposal (see section 7.1). \n Weapons and ammunition are stored separately or organized for transportation under the instructions and guidance of a WAM adviser (see section 7.2 and DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11). Ammunition presenting an immediate risk, or deemed unfit for transport, should be destroyed in situ by qualified EOD specialists.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -73362,14 +73362,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.2 Procedures for disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n If the individual is also in possession of ammunition for small arms or machine guns, she\/he will be asked to place it in a separate pre-identified location, away from the weapons.", + "Sentence": "\n If the individual is also in possession of ammunition for small arms or machine guns, she\/he will be asked to place it in a separate pre-identified location, away from the weapons.", "newParagraph": "entering perimeter n individual directed unloading bay shehe proceed clearing hisher weapon instruction supervision milob representative un military component mission setting designated security official nonmission setting individual 18 year old child protection staff shall present throughout process n weapon cleared handed milob representative military component mission setting designated security official nonmission setting proceed verification n individual also possession ammunition small arm machine gun shehe asked place separate preidentified location away weapon n materiel handed recorded ddr practitioner guidance weapon ammunition identification specialist un agency personnel arm specialist along information individual concerned n individual provided receipt prof shehe handed weapon andor ammunition receipt indicates name individual date location type status serviceable serial number weapon n weapon tagged code facilitate storage management recordkeeping throughout disarmament process disposal see section 71 n weapon ammunition stored separately organized transportation instruction guidance wam adviser see section 72 ddr wam handbook unit 11 ammunition presenting immediate risk deemed unfit transport destroyed situ qualified eod specialist", "ProcessedSent": "n individual also possession ammunition small arm machine gun shehe asked place separate preidentified location away weapon", "SentID": 4075 }, { "ParagraphID": 1302, - "Paragraph": "After entering the perimeter: \\n The individual is directed to the unloading bay, where she\/he will proceed with the clearing of his\/her weapon under the instruction and supervision of a MILOB or representative of the UN military component in mission settings or designated security official in a non-mission setting. If the individual is under 18 years old, child protection staff shall be present throughout the process. \\n Once the weapon has been cleared, it is handed over to a MILOB or representative of the military component in a mission setting or designated security official in a non-mission setting who will proceed with verification. \\n If the individual is also in possession of ammunition for small arms or machine guns, she\/he will be asked to place it in a separate pre-identified location, away from the weapons. \\n The materiel handed in is recorded by a DDR practitioner with guidance on weapons and ammunition identification from specialist UN agency personnel or other arms specialists along with information on the individual concerned. \\n The individual is provided with a receipt that proves she\/he has handed in a weapon and\/or ammunition. The receipt indicates the name of the individual, the date and location, the type, the status (serviceable or not) and the serial number of the weapon. \\n Weapons are tagged with a code to facilitate storage, management and recordkeeping throughout the disarmament process until disposal (see section 7.1). \\n Weapons and ammunition are stored separately or organized for transportation under the instructions and guidance of a WAM adviser (see section 7.2 and DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11). Ammunition presenting an immediate risk, or deemed unfit for transport, should be destroyed in situ by qualified EOD specialists.", + "Paragraph": "After entering the perimeter: \n The individual is directed to the unloading bay, where she\/he will proceed with the clearing of his\/her weapon under the instruction and supervision of a MILOB or representative of the UN military component in mission settings or designated security official in a non-mission setting. If the individual is under 18 years old, child protection staff shall be present throughout the process. \n Once the weapon has been cleared, it is handed over to a MILOB or representative of the military component in a mission setting or designated security official in a non-mission setting who will proceed with verification. \n If the individual is also in possession of ammunition for small arms or machine guns, she\/he will be asked to place it in a separate pre-identified location, away from the weapons. \n The materiel handed in is recorded by a DDR practitioner with guidance on weapons and ammunition identification from specialist UN agency personnel or other arms specialists along with information on the individual concerned. \n The individual is provided with a receipt that proves she\/he has handed in a weapon and\/or ammunition. The receipt indicates the name of the individual, the date and location, the type, the status (serviceable or not) and the serial number of the weapon. \n Weapons are tagged with a code to facilitate storage, management and recordkeeping throughout the disarmament process until disposal (see section 7.1). \n Weapons and ammunition are stored separately or organized for transportation under the instructions and guidance of a WAM adviser (see section 7.2 and DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11). Ammunition presenting an immediate risk, or deemed unfit for transport, should be destroyed in situ by qualified EOD specialists.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -73380,14 +73380,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.2 Procedures for disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The materiel handed in is recorded by a DDR practitioner with guidance on weapons and ammunition identification from specialist UN agency personnel or other arms specialists along with information on the individual concerned.", + "Sentence": "\n The materiel handed in is recorded by a DDR practitioner with guidance on weapons and ammunition identification from specialist UN agency personnel or other arms specialists along with information on the individual concerned.", "newParagraph": "entering perimeter n individual directed unloading bay shehe proceed clearing hisher weapon instruction supervision milob representative un military component mission setting designated security official nonmission setting individual 18 year old child protection staff shall present throughout process n weapon cleared handed milob representative military component mission setting designated security official nonmission setting proceed verification n individual also possession ammunition small arm machine gun shehe asked place separate preidentified location away weapon n materiel handed recorded ddr practitioner guidance weapon ammunition identification specialist un agency personnel arm specialist along information individual concerned n individual provided receipt prof shehe handed weapon andor ammunition receipt indicates name individual date location type status serviceable serial number weapon n weapon tagged code facilitate storage management recordkeeping throughout disarmament process disposal see section 71 n weapon ammunition stored separately organized transportation instruction guidance wam adviser see section 72 ddr wam handbook unit 11 ammunition presenting immediate risk deemed unfit transport destroyed situ qualified eod specialist", "ProcessedSent": "n materiel handed recorded ddr practitioner guidance weapon ammunition identification specialist un agency personnel arm specialist along information individual concerned", "SentID": 4076 }, { "ParagraphID": 1302, - "Paragraph": "After entering the perimeter: \\n The individual is directed to the unloading bay, where she\/he will proceed with the clearing of his\/her weapon under the instruction and supervision of a MILOB or representative of the UN military component in mission settings or designated security official in a non-mission setting. If the individual is under 18 years old, child protection staff shall be present throughout the process. \\n Once the weapon has been cleared, it is handed over to a MILOB or representative of the military component in a mission setting or designated security official in a non-mission setting who will proceed with verification. \\n If the individual is also in possession of ammunition for small arms or machine guns, she\/he will be asked to place it in a separate pre-identified location, away from the weapons. \\n The materiel handed in is recorded by a DDR practitioner with guidance on weapons and ammunition identification from specialist UN agency personnel or other arms specialists along with information on the individual concerned. \\n The individual is provided with a receipt that proves she\/he has handed in a weapon and\/or ammunition. The receipt indicates the name of the individual, the date and location, the type, the status (serviceable or not) and the serial number of the weapon. \\n Weapons are tagged with a code to facilitate storage, management and recordkeeping throughout the disarmament process until disposal (see section 7.1). \\n Weapons and ammunition are stored separately or organized for transportation under the instructions and guidance of a WAM adviser (see section 7.2 and DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11). Ammunition presenting an immediate risk, or deemed unfit for transport, should be destroyed in situ by qualified EOD specialists.", + "Paragraph": "After entering the perimeter: \n The individual is directed to the unloading bay, where she\/he will proceed with the clearing of his\/her weapon under the instruction and supervision of a MILOB or representative of the UN military component in mission settings or designated security official in a non-mission setting. If the individual is under 18 years old, child protection staff shall be present throughout the process. \n Once the weapon has been cleared, it is handed over to a MILOB or representative of the military component in a mission setting or designated security official in a non-mission setting who will proceed with verification. \n If the individual is also in possession of ammunition for small arms or machine guns, she\/he will be asked to place it in a separate pre-identified location, away from the weapons. \n The materiel handed in is recorded by a DDR practitioner with guidance on weapons and ammunition identification from specialist UN agency personnel or other arms specialists along with information on the individual concerned. \n The individual is provided with a receipt that proves she\/he has handed in a weapon and\/or ammunition. The receipt indicates the name of the individual, the date and location, the type, the status (serviceable or not) and the serial number of the weapon. \n Weapons are tagged with a code to facilitate storage, management and recordkeeping throughout the disarmament process until disposal (see section 7.1). \n Weapons and ammunition are stored separately or organized for transportation under the instructions and guidance of a WAM adviser (see section 7.2 and DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11). Ammunition presenting an immediate risk, or deemed unfit for transport, should be destroyed in situ by qualified EOD specialists.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -73398,14 +73398,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.2 Procedures for disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The individual is provided with a receipt that proves she\/he has handed in a weapon and\/or ammunition.", + "Sentence": "\n The individual is provided with a receipt that proves she\/he has handed in a weapon and\/or ammunition.", "newParagraph": "entering perimeter n individual directed unloading bay shehe proceed clearing hisher weapon instruction supervision milob representative un military component mission setting designated security official nonmission setting individual 18 year old child protection staff shall present throughout process n weapon cleared handed milob representative military component mission setting designated security official nonmission setting proceed verification n individual also possession ammunition small arm machine gun shehe asked place separate preidentified location away weapon n materiel handed recorded ddr practitioner guidance weapon ammunition identification specialist un agency personnel arm specialist along information individual concerned n individual provided receipt prof shehe handed weapon andor ammunition receipt indicates name individual date location type status serviceable serial number weapon n weapon tagged code facilitate storage management recordkeeping throughout disarmament process disposal see section 71 n weapon ammunition stored separately organized transportation instruction guidance wam adviser see section 72 ddr wam handbook unit 11 ammunition presenting immediate risk deemed unfit transport destroyed situ qualified eod specialist", "ProcessedSent": "n individual provided receipt prof shehe handed weapon andor ammunition", "SentID": 4077 }, { "ParagraphID": 1302, - "Paragraph": "After entering the perimeter: \\n The individual is directed to the unloading bay, where she\/he will proceed with the clearing of his\/her weapon under the instruction and supervision of a MILOB or representative of the UN military component in mission settings or designated security official in a non-mission setting. If the individual is under 18 years old, child protection staff shall be present throughout the process. \\n Once the weapon has been cleared, it is handed over to a MILOB or representative of the military component in a mission setting or designated security official in a non-mission setting who will proceed with verification. \\n If the individual is also in possession of ammunition for small arms or machine guns, she\/he will be asked to place it in a separate pre-identified location, away from the weapons. \\n The materiel handed in is recorded by a DDR practitioner with guidance on weapons and ammunition identification from specialist UN agency personnel or other arms specialists along with information on the individual concerned. \\n The individual is provided with a receipt that proves she\/he has handed in a weapon and\/or ammunition. The receipt indicates the name of the individual, the date and location, the type, the status (serviceable or not) and the serial number of the weapon. \\n Weapons are tagged with a code to facilitate storage, management and recordkeeping throughout the disarmament process until disposal (see section 7.1). \\n Weapons and ammunition are stored separately or organized for transportation under the instructions and guidance of a WAM adviser (see section 7.2 and DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11). Ammunition presenting an immediate risk, or deemed unfit for transport, should be destroyed in situ by qualified EOD specialists.", + "Paragraph": "After entering the perimeter: \n The individual is directed to the unloading bay, where she\/he will proceed with the clearing of his\/her weapon under the instruction and supervision of a MILOB or representative of the UN military component in mission settings or designated security official in a non-mission setting. If the individual is under 18 years old, child protection staff shall be present throughout the process. \n Once the weapon has been cleared, it is handed over to a MILOB or representative of the military component in a mission setting or designated security official in a non-mission setting who will proceed with verification. \n If the individual is also in possession of ammunition for small arms or machine guns, she\/he will be asked to place it in a separate pre-identified location, away from the weapons. \n The materiel handed in is recorded by a DDR practitioner with guidance on weapons and ammunition identification from specialist UN agency personnel or other arms specialists along with information on the individual concerned. \n The individual is provided with a receipt that proves she\/he has handed in a weapon and\/or ammunition. The receipt indicates the name of the individual, the date and location, the type, the status (serviceable or not) and the serial number of the weapon. \n Weapons are tagged with a code to facilitate storage, management and recordkeeping throughout the disarmament process until disposal (see section 7.1). \n Weapons and ammunition are stored separately or organized for transportation under the instructions and guidance of a WAM adviser (see section 7.2 and DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11). Ammunition presenting an immediate risk, or deemed unfit for transport, should be destroyed in situ by qualified EOD specialists.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -73423,7 +73423,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1302, - "Paragraph": "After entering the perimeter: \\n The individual is directed to the unloading bay, where she\/he will proceed with the clearing of his\/her weapon under the instruction and supervision of a MILOB or representative of the UN military component in mission settings or designated security official in a non-mission setting. If the individual is under 18 years old, child protection staff shall be present throughout the process. \\n Once the weapon has been cleared, it is handed over to a MILOB or representative of the military component in a mission setting or designated security official in a non-mission setting who will proceed with verification. \\n If the individual is also in possession of ammunition for small arms or machine guns, she\/he will be asked to place it in a separate pre-identified location, away from the weapons. \\n The materiel handed in is recorded by a DDR practitioner with guidance on weapons and ammunition identification from specialist UN agency personnel or other arms specialists along with information on the individual concerned. \\n The individual is provided with a receipt that proves she\/he has handed in a weapon and\/or ammunition. The receipt indicates the name of the individual, the date and location, the type, the status (serviceable or not) and the serial number of the weapon. \\n Weapons are tagged with a code to facilitate storage, management and recordkeeping throughout the disarmament process until disposal (see section 7.1). \\n Weapons and ammunition are stored separately or organized for transportation under the instructions and guidance of a WAM adviser (see section 7.2 and DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11). Ammunition presenting an immediate risk, or deemed unfit for transport, should be destroyed in situ by qualified EOD specialists.", + "Paragraph": "After entering the perimeter: \n The individual is directed to the unloading bay, where she\/he will proceed with the clearing of his\/her weapon under the instruction and supervision of a MILOB or representative of the UN military component in mission settings or designated security official in a non-mission setting. If the individual is under 18 years old, child protection staff shall be present throughout the process. \n Once the weapon has been cleared, it is handed over to a MILOB or representative of the military component in a mission setting or designated security official in a non-mission setting who will proceed with verification. \n If the individual is also in possession of ammunition for small arms or machine guns, she\/he will be asked to place it in a separate pre-identified location, away from the weapons. \n The materiel handed in is recorded by a DDR practitioner with guidance on weapons and ammunition identification from specialist UN agency personnel or other arms specialists along with information on the individual concerned. \n The individual is provided with a receipt that proves she\/he has handed in a weapon and\/or ammunition. The receipt indicates the name of the individual, the date and location, the type, the status (serviceable or not) and the serial number of the weapon. \n Weapons are tagged with a code to facilitate storage, management and recordkeeping throughout the disarmament process until disposal (see section 7.1). \n Weapons and ammunition are stored separately or organized for transportation under the instructions and guidance of a WAM adviser (see section 7.2 and DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11). Ammunition presenting an immediate risk, or deemed unfit for transport, should be destroyed in situ by qualified EOD specialists.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -73434,14 +73434,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.2 Procedures for disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Weapons are tagged with a code to facilitate storage, management and recordkeeping throughout the disarmament process until disposal (see section 7.1).", + "Sentence": "\n Weapons are tagged with a code to facilitate storage, management and recordkeeping throughout the disarmament process until disposal (see section 7.1).", "newParagraph": "entering perimeter n individual directed unloading bay shehe proceed clearing hisher weapon instruction supervision milob representative un military component mission setting designated security official nonmission setting individual 18 year old child protection staff shall present throughout process n weapon cleared handed milob representative military component mission setting designated security official nonmission setting proceed verification n individual also possession ammunition small arm machine gun shehe asked place separate preidentified location away weapon n materiel handed recorded ddr practitioner guidance weapon ammunition identification specialist un agency personnel arm specialist along information individual concerned n individual provided receipt prof shehe handed weapon andor ammunition receipt indicates name individual date location type status serviceable serial number weapon n weapon tagged code facilitate storage management recordkeeping throughout disarmament process disposal see section 71 n weapon ammunition stored separately organized transportation instruction guidance wam adviser see section 72 ddr wam handbook unit 11 ammunition presenting immediate risk deemed unfit transport destroyed situ qualified eod specialist", "ProcessedSent": "n weapon tagged code facilitate storage management recordkeeping throughout disarmament process disposal see section 71", "SentID": 4079 }, { "ParagraphID": 1302, - "Paragraph": "After entering the perimeter: \\n The individual is directed to the unloading bay, where she\/he will proceed with the clearing of his\/her weapon under the instruction and supervision of a MILOB or representative of the UN military component in mission settings or designated security official in a non-mission setting. If the individual is under 18 years old, child protection staff shall be present throughout the process. \\n Once the weapon has been cleared, it is handed over to a MILOB or representative of the military component in a mission setting or designated security official in a non-mission setting who will proceed with verification. \\n If the individual is also in possession of ammunition for small arms or machine guns, she\/he will be asked to place it in a separate pre-identified location, away from the weapons. \\n The materiel handed in is recorded by a DDR practitioner with guidance on weapons and ammunition identification from specialist UN agency personnel or other arms specialists along with information on the individual concerned. \\n The individual is provided with a receipt that proves she\/he has handed in a weapon and\/or ammunition. The receipt indicates the name of the individual, the date and location, the type, the status (serviceable or not) and the serial number of the weapon. \\n Weapons are tagged with a code to facilitate storage, management and recordkeeping throughout the disarmament process until disposal (see section 7.1). \\n Weapons and ammunition are stored separately or organized for transportation under the instructions and guidance of a WAM adviser (see section 7.2 and DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11). Ammunition presenting an immediate risk, or deemed unfit for transport, should be destroyed in situ by qualified EOD specialists.", + "Paragraph": "After entering the perimeter: \n The individual is directed to the unloading bay, where she\/he will proceed with the clearing of his\/her weapon under the instruction and supervision of a MILOB or representative of the UN military component in mission settings or designated security official in a non-mission setting. If the individual is under 18 years old, child protection staff shall be present throughout the process. \n Once the weapon has been cleared, it is handed over to a MILOB or representative of the military component in a mission setting or designated security official in a non-mission setting who will proceed with verification. \n If the individual is also in possession of ammunition for small arms or machine guns, she\/he will be asked to place it in a separate pre-identified location, away from the weapons. \n The materiel handed in is recorded by a DDR practitioner with guidance on weapons and ammunition identification from specialist UN agency personnel or other arms specialists along with information on the individual concerned. \n The individual is provided with a receipt that proves she\/he has handed in a weapon and\/or ammunition. The receipt indicates the name of the individual, the date and location, the type, the status (serviceable or not) and the serial number of the weapon. \n Weapons are tagged with a code to facilitate storage, management and recordkeeping throughout the disarmament process until disposal (see section 7.1). \n Weapons and ammunition are stored separately or organized for transportation under the instructions and guidance of a WAM adviser (see section 7.2 and DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11). Ammunition presenting an immediate risk, or deemed unfit for transport, should be destroyed in situ by qualified EOD specialists.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -73452,14 +73452,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.2 Procedures for disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Weapons and ammunition are stored separately or organized for transportation under the instructions and guidance of a WAM adviser (see section 7.2 and DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11).", + "Sentence": "\n Weapons and ammunition are stored separately or organized for transportation under the instructions and guidance of a WAM adviser (see section 7.2 and DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11).", "newParagraph": "entering perimeter n individual directed unloading bay shehe proceed clearing hisher weapon instruction supervision milob representative un military component mission setting designated security official nonmission setting individual 18 year old child protection staff shall present throughout process n weapon cleared handed milob representative military component mission setting designated security official nonmission setting proceed verification n individual also possession ammunition small arm machine gun shehe asked place separate preidentified location away weapon n materiel handed recorded ddr practitioner guidance weapon ammunition identification specialist un agency personnel arm specialist along information individual concerned n individual provided receipt prof shehe handed weapon andor ammunition receipt indicates name individual date location type status serviceable serial number weapon n weapon tagged code facilitate storage management recordkeeping throughout disarmament process disposal see section 71 n weapon ammunition stored separately organized transportation instruction guidance wam adviser see section 72 ddr wam handbook unit 11 ammunition presenting immediate risk deemed unfit transport destroyed situ qualified eod specialist", "ProcessedSent": "n weapon ammunition stored separately organized transportation instruction guidance wam adviser see section 72 ddr wam handbook unit 11", "SentID": 4080 }, { "ParagraphID": 1302, - "Paragraph": "After entering the perimeter: \\n The individual is directed to the unloading bay, where she\/he will proceed with the clearing of his\/her weapon under the instruction and supervision of a MILOB or representative of the UN military component in mission settings or designated security official in a non-mission setting. If the individual is under 18 years old, child protection staff shall be present throughout the process. \\n Once the weapon has been cleared, it is handed over to a MILOB or representative of the military component in a mission setting or designated security official in a non-mission setting who will proceed with verification. \\n If the individual is also in possession of ammunition for small arms or machine guns, she\/he will be asked to place it in a separate pre-identified location, away from the weapons. \\n The materiel handed in is recorded by a DDR practitioner with guidance on weapons and ammunition identification from specialist UN agency personnel or other arms specialists along with information on the individual concerned. \\n The individual is provided with a receipt that proves she\/he has handed in a weapon and\/or ammunition. The receipt indicates the name of the individual, the date and location, the type, the status (serviceable or not) and the serial number of the weapon. \\n Weapons are tagged with a code to facilitate storage, management and recordkeeping throughout the disarmament process until disposal (see section 7.1). \\n Weapons and ammunition are stored separately or organized for transportation under the instructions and guidance of a WAM adviser (see section 7.2 and DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11). Ammunition presenting an immediate risk, or deemed unfit for transport, should be destroyed in situ by qualified EOD specialists.", + "Paragraph": "After entering the perimeter: \n The individual is directed to the unloading bay, where she\/he will proceed with the clearing of his\/her weapon under the instruction and supervision of a MILOB or representative of the UN military component in mission settings or designated security official in a non-mission setting. If the individual is under 18 years old, child protection staff shall be present throughout the process. \n Once the weapon has been cleared, it is handed over to a MILOB or representative of the military component in a mission setting or designated security official in a non-mission setting who will proceed with verification. \n If the individual is also in possession of ammunition for small arms or machine guns, she\/he will be asked to place it in a separate pre-identified location, away from the weapons. \n The materiel handed in is recorded by a DDR practitioner with guidance on weapons and ammunition identification from specialist UN agency personnel or other arms specialists along with information on the individual concerned. \n The individual is provided with a receipt that proves she\/he has handed in a weapon and\/or ammunition. The receipt indicates the name of the individual, the date and location, the type, the status (serviceable or not) and the serial number of the weapon. \n Weapons are tagged with a code to facilitate storage, management and recordkeeping throughout the disarmament process until disposal (see section 7.1). \n Weapons and ammunition are stored separately or organized for transportation under the instructions and guidance of a WAM adviser (see section 7.2 and DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11). Ammunition presenting an immediate risk, or deemed unfit for transport, should be destroyed in situ by qualified EOD specialists.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -73477,7 +73477,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1303, - "Paragraph": "BOX 6: PROCESSING HEAVY WEAPONS AND THEIR AMMUNITION \\n An increasing number of armed groups in areas of conflict across the world use light and heavy weapons, including heavy artillery or armoured fighting vehicles. Dealing with heavy weapons presents both logistical and political challenges. In certain settings, heavy weapons could be included in the eligibility criteria for a DDR programme, and the ratio of arms to combatants could be determined based on the number of crew required to operate each specific weapons system. However, while small arms and most light weapons are generally seen as an individual asset, heavy weapons are often considered a group asset, and thus may not be surrendered during disarmament operations that focus on individual combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups. \\n To ensure comprehensive disarmament and avoid the exploitation of loopholes, peace negotiations and the national DDR programme should determine the procedures related to the arsenals of armed groups, including heavy weapons and\/or caches of materiel. Processing heavy weapons and their ammunition requires a high level of technical knowledge. Heavy-weapons systems can be complex and require specialist expertise to ensure that systems are made safe, unloaded and all items of ammunition are safely separated from the platform. Conducting a thorough weapons survey and planning is vital to ensure the correct expertise is made available. The UN DDR component in mission settings or UN lead agency(ies) in non-mission settings should provide advice with regards to the collection, storage and disposal of heavy weapons, and support the development of any related SOPs. Procedures regarding heavy weapons should be clearly communicated to armed forces and groups prior to any disarmament operations to avoid unorganized and unscheduled movements of heavy weapons that might foment further tensions among the population. Destruction of heavy weapons requires significant logistics (see section 8); it is therefore critical to ensure the physical security of these weapons in order to reduce the risk of diversion.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 6: PROCESSING HEAVY WEAPONS AND THEIR AMMUNITION \n An increasing number of armed groups in areas of conflict across the world use light and heavy weapons, including heavy artillery or armoured fighting vehicles. Dealing with heavy weapons presents both logistical and political challenges. In certain settings, heavy weapons could be included in the eligibility criteria for a DDR programme, and the ratio of arms to combatants could be determined based on the number of crew required to operate each specific weapons system. However, while small arms and most light weapons are generally seen as an individual asset, heavy weapons are often considered a group asset, and thus may not be surrendered during disarmament operations that focus on individual combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups. \n To ensure comprehensive disarmament and avoid the exploitation of loopholes, peace negotiations and the national DDR programme should determine the procedures related to the arsenals of armed groups, including heavy weapons and\/or caches of materiel. Processing heavy weapons and their ammunition requires a high level of technical knowledge. Heavy-weapons systems can be complex and require specialist expertise to ensure that systems are made safe, unloaded and all items of ammunition are safely separated from the platform. Conducting a thorough weapons survey and planning is vital to ensure the correct expertise is made available. The UN DDR component in mission settings or UN lead agency(ies) in non-mission settings should provide advice with regards to the collection, storage and disposal of heavy weapons, and support the development of any related SOPs. Procedures regarding heavy weapons should be clearly communicated to armed forces and groups prior to any disarmament operations to avoid unorganized and unscheduled movements of heavy weapons that might foment further tensions among the population. Destruction of heavy weapons requires significant logistics (see section 8); it is therefore critical to ensure the physical security of these weapons in order to reduce the risk of diversion.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -73488,14 +73488,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.2 Procedures for disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "BOX 6: PROCESSING HEAVY WEAPONS AND THEIR AMMUNITION \\n An increasing number of armed groups in areas of conflict across the world use light and heavy weapons, including heavy artillery or armoured fighting vehicles.", + "Sentence": "BOX 6: PROCESSING HEAVY WEAPONS AND THEIR AMMUNITION \n An increasing number of armed groups in areas of conflict across the world use light and heavy weapons, including heavy artillery or armoured fighting vehicles.", "newParagraph": "box 6 processing heavy weapon ammunition n increasing number armed group area conflict across world use light heavy weapon including heavy artillery armoured fighting vehicle dealing heavy weapon present logistical political challenge certain setting heavy weapon could included eligibility criterion ddr programme ratio arm combatant could determined based number crew required operate specific weapon system however small arm light weapon generally seen individual asset heavy weapon often considered group asset thus may surrendered disarmament operation focus individual combatant person associated armed force group n ensure comprehensive disarmament avoid exploitation loophole peace negotiation national ddr programme determine procedure related arsenal armed group including heavy weapon andor cache materiel processing heavy weapon ammunition requires high level technical knowledge heavyweapons system complex require specialist expertise ensure system made safe unloaded item ammunition safely separated platform conducting thorough weapon survey planning vital ensure correct expertise made available un ddr component mission setting un lead agencyies nonmission setting provide advice regard collection storage disposal heavy weapon support development related sop procedure regarding heavy weapon clearly communicated armed force group prior disarmament operation avoid unorganized unscheduled movement heavy weapon might foment tension among population destruction heavy weapon requires significant logistics see section 8 therefore critical ensure physical security weapon order reduce risk diversion", "ProcessedSent": "box 6 processing heavy weapon ammunition n increasing number armed group area conflict across world use light heavy weapon including heavy artillery armoured fighting vehicle", "SentID": 4082 }, { "ParagraphID": 1303, - "Paragraph": "BOX 6: PROCESSING HEAVY WEAPONS AND THEIR AMMUNITION \\n An increasing number of armed groups in areas of conflict across the world use light and heavy weapons, including heavy artillery or armoured fighting vehicles. Dealing with heavy weapons presents both logistical and political challenges. In certain settings, heavy weapons could be included in the eligibility criteria for a DDR programme, and the ratio of arms to combatants could be determined based on the number of crew required to operate each specific weapons system. However, while small arms and most light weapons are generally seen as an individual asset, heavy weapons are often considered a group asset, and thus may not be surrendered during disarmament operations that focus on individual combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups. \\n To ensure comprehensive disarmament and avoid the exploitation of loopholes, peace negotiations and the national DDR programme should determine the procedures related to the arsenals of armed groups, including heavy weapons and\/or caches of materiel. Processing heavy weapons and their ammunition requires a high level of technical knowledge. Heavy-weapons systems can be complex and require specialist expertise to ensure that systems are made safe, unloaded and all items of ammunition are safely separated from the platform. Conducting a thorough weapons survey and planning is vital to ensure the correct expertise is made available. The UN DDR component in mission settings or UN lead agency(ies) in non-mission settings should provide advice with regards to the collection, storage and disposal of heavy weapons, and support the development of any related SOPs. Procedures regarding heavy weapons should be clearly communicated to armed forces and groups prior to any disarmament operations to avoid unorganized and unscheduled movements of heavy weapons that might foment further tensions among the population. Destruction of heavy weapons requires significant logistics (see section 8); it is therefore critical to ensure the physical security of these weapons in order to reduce the risk of diversion.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 6: PROCESSING HEAVY WEAPONS AND THEIR AMMUNITION \n An increasing number of armed groups in areas of conflict across the world use light and heavy weapons, including heavy artillery or armoured fighting vehicles. Dealing with heavy weapons presents both logistical and political challenges. In certain settings, heavy weapons could be included in the eligibility criteria for a DDR programme, and the ratio of arms to combatants could be determined based on the number of crew required to operate each specific weapons system. However, while small arms and most light weapons are generally seen as an individual asset, heavy weapons are often considered a group asset, and thus may not be surrendered during disarmament operations that focus on individual combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups. \n To ensure comprehensive disarmament and avoid the exploitation of loopholes, peace negotiations and the national DDR programme should determine the procedures related to the arsenals of armed groups, including heavy weapons and\/or caches of materiel. Processing heavy weapons and their ammunition requires a high level of technical knowledge. Heavy-weapons systems can be complex and require specialist expertise to ensure that systems are made safe, unloaded and all items of ammunition are safely separated from the platform. Conducting a thorough weapons survey and planning is vital to ensure the correct expertise is made available. The UN DDR component in mission settings or UN lead agency(ies) in non-mission settings should provide advice with regards to the collection, storage and disposal of heavy weapons, and support the development of any related SOPs. Procedures regarding heavy weapons should be clearly communicated to armed forces and groups prior to any disarmament operations to avoid unorganized and unscheduled movements of heavy weapons that might foment further tensions among the population. Destruction of heavy weapons requires significant logistics (see section 8); it is therefore critical to ensure the physical security of these weapons in order to reduce the risk of diversion.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -73513,7 +73513,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1303, - "Paragraph": "BOX 6: PROCESSING HEAVY WEAPONS AND THEIR AMMUNITION \\n An increasing number of armed groups in areas of conflict across the world use light and heavy weapons, including heavy artillery or armoured fighting vehicles. Dealing with heavy weapons presents both logistical and political challenges. In certain settings, heavy weapons could be included in the eligibility criteria for a DDR programme, and the ratio of arms to combatants could be determined based on the number of crew required to operate each specific weapons system. However, while small arms and most light weapons are generally seen as an individual asset, heavy weapons are often considered a group asset, and thus may not be surrendered during disarmament operations that focus on individual combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups. \\n To ensure comprehensive disarmament and avoid the exploitation of loopholes, peace negotiations and the national DDR programme should determine the procedures related to the arsenals of armed groups, including heavy weapons and\/or caches of materiel. Processing heavy weapons and their ammunition requires a high level of technical knowledge. Heavy-weapons systems can be complex and require specialist expertise to ensure that systems are made safe, unloaded and all items of ammunition are safely separated from the platform. Conducting a thorough weapons survey and planning is vital to ensure the correct expertise is made available. The UN DDR component in mission settings or UN lead agency(ies) in non-mission settings should provide advice with regards to the collection, storage and disposal of heavy weapons, and support the development of any related SOPs. Procedures regarding heavy weapons should be clearly communicated to armed forces and groups prior to any disarmament operations to avoid unorganized and unscheduled movements of heavy weapons that might foment further tensions among the population. Destruction of heavy weapons requires significant logistics (see section 8); it is therefore critical to ensure the physical security of these weapons in order to reduce the risk of diversion.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 6: PROCESSING HEAVY WEAPONS AND THEIR AMMUNITION \n An increasing number of armed groups in areas of conflict across the world use light and heavy weapons, including heavy artillery or armoured fighting vehicles. Dealing with heavy weapons presents both logistical and political challenges. In certain settings, heavy weapons could be included in the eligibility criteria for a DDR programme, and the ratio of arms to combatants could be determined based on the number of crew required to operate each specific weapons system. However, while small arms and most light weapons are generally seen as an individual asset, heavy weapons are often considered a group asset, and thus may not be surrendered during disarmament operations that focus on individual combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups. \n To ensure comprehensive disarmament and avoid the exploitation of loopholes, peace negotiations and the national DDR programme should determine the procedures related to the arsenals of armed groups, including heavy weapons and\/or caches of materiel. Processing heavy weapons and their ammunition requires a high level of technical knowledge. Heavy-weapons systems can be complex and require specialist expertise to ensure that systems are made safe, unloaded and all items of ammunition are safely separated from the platform. Conducting a thorough weapons survey and planning is vital to ensure the correct expertise is made available. The UN DDR component in mission settings or UN lead agency(ies) in non-mission settings should provide advice with regards to the collection, storage and disposal of heavy weapons, and support the development of any related SOPs. Procedures regarding heavy weapons should be clearly communicated to armed forces and groups prior to any disarmament operations to avoid unorganized and unscheduled movements of heavy weapons that might foment further tensions among the population. Destruction of heavy weapons requires significant logistics (see section 8); it is therefore critical to ensure the physical security of these weapons in order to reduce the risk of diversion.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -73531,7 +73531,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1303, - "Paragraph": "BOX 6: PROCESSING HEAVY WEAPONS AND THEIR AMMUNITION \\n An increasing number of armed groups in areas of conflict across the world use light and heavy weapons, including heavy artillery or armoured fighting vehicles. Dealing with heavy weapons presents both logistical and political challenges. In certain settings, heavy weapons could be included in the eligibility criteria for a DDR programme, and the ratio of arms to combatants could be determined based on the number of crew required to operate each specific weapons system. However, while small arms and most light weapons are generally seen as an individual asset, heavy weapons are often considered a group asset, and thus may not be surrendered during disarmament operations that focus on individual combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups. \\n To ensure comprehensive disarmament and avoid the exploitation of loopholes, peace negotiations and the national DDR programme should determine the procedures related to the arsenals of armed groups, including heavy weapons and\/or caches of materiel. Processing heavy weapons and their ammunition requires a high level of technical knowledge. Heavy-weapons systems can be complex and require specialist expertise to ensure that systems are made safe, unloaded and all items of ammunition are safely separated from the platform. Conducting a thorough weapons survey and planning is vital to ensure the correct expertise is made available. The UN DDR component in mission settings or UN lead agency(ies) in non-mission settings should provide advice with regards to the collection, storage and disposal of heavy weapons, and support the development of any related SOPs. Procedures regarding heavy weapons should be clearly communicated to armed forces and groups prior to any disarmament operations to avoid unorganized and unscheduled movements of heavy weapons that might foment further tensions among the population. Destruction of heavy weapons requires significant logistics (see section 8); it is therefore critical to ensure the physical security of these weapons in order to reduce the risk of diversion.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 6: PROCESSING HEAVY WEAPONS AND THEIR AMMUNITION \n An increasing number of armed groups in areas of conflict across the world use light and heavy weapons, including heavy artillery or armoured fighting vehicles. Dealing with heavy weapons presents both logistical and political challenges. In certain settings, heavy weapons could be included in the eligibility criteria for a DDR programme, and the ratio of arms to combatants could be determined based on the number of crew required to operate each specific weapons system. However, while small arms and most light weapons are generally seen as an individual asset, heavy weapons are often considered a group asset, and thus may not be surrendered during disarmament operations that focus on individual combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups. \n To ensure comprehensive disarmament and avoid the exploitation of loopholes, peace negotiations and the national DDR programme should determine the procedures related to the arsenals of armed groups, including heavy weapons and\/or caches of materiel. Processing heavy weapons and their ammunition requires a high level of technical knowledge. Heavy-weapons systems can be complex and require specialist expertise to ensure that systems are made safe, unloaded and all items of ammunition are safely separated from the platform. Conducting a thorough weapons survey and planning is vital to ensure the correct expertise is made available. The UN DDR component in mission settings or UN lead agency(ies) in non-mission settings should provide advice with regards to the collection, storage and disposal of heavy weapons, and support the development of any related SOPs. Procedures regarding heavy weapons should be clearly communicated to armed forces and groups prior to any disarmament operations to avoid unorganized and unscheduled movements of heavy weapons that might foment further tensions among the population. Destruction of heavy weapons requires significant logistics (see section 8); it is therefore critical to ensure the physical security of these weapons in order to reduce the risk of diversion.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -73549,7 +73549,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1303, - "Paragraph": "BOX 6: PROCESSING HEAVY WEAPONS AND THEIR AMMUNITION \\n An increasing number of armed groups in areas of conflict across the world use light and heavy weapons, including heavy artillery or armoured fighting vehicles. Dealing with heavy weapons presents both logistical and political challenges. In certain settings, heavy weapons could be included in the eligibility criteria for a DDR programme, and the ratio of arms to combatants could be determined based on the number of crew required to operate each specific weapons system. However, while small arms and most light weapons are generally seen as an individual asset, heavy weapons are often considered a group asset, and thus may not be surrendered during disarmament operations that focus on individual combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups. \\n To ensure comprehensive disarmament and avoid the exploitation of loopholes, peace negotiations and the national DDR programme should determine the procedures related to the arsenals of armed groups, including heavy weapons and\/or caches of materiel. Processing heavy weapons and their ammunition requires a high level of technical knowledge. Heavy-weapons systems can be complex and require specialist expertise to ensure that systems are made safe, unloaded and all items of ammunition are safely separated from the platform. Conducting a thorough weapons survey and planning is vital to ensure the correct expertise is made available. The UN DDR component in mission settings or UN lead agency(ies) in non-mission settings should provide advice with regards to the collection, storage and disposal of heavy weapons, and support the development of any related SOPs. Procedures regarding heavy weapons should be clearly communicated to armed forces and groups prior to any disarmament operations to avoid unorganized and unscheduled movements of heavy weapons that might foment further tensions among the population. Destruction of heavy weapons requires significant logistics (see section 8); it is therefore critical to ensure the physical security of these weapons in order to reduce the risk of diversion.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 6: PROCESSING HEAVY WEAPONS AND THEIR AMMUNITION \n An increasing number of armed groups in areas of conflict across the world use light and heavy weapons, including heavy artillery or armoured fighting vehicles. Dealing with heavy weapons presents both logistical and political challenges. In certain settings, heavy weapons could be included in the eligibility criteria for a DDR programme, and the ratio of arms to combatants could be determined based on the number of crew required to operate each specific weapons system. However, while small arms and most light weapons are generally seen as an individual asset, heavy weapons are often considered a group asset, and thus may not be surrendered during disarmament operations that focus on individual combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups. \n To ensure comprehensive disarmament and avoid the exploitation of loopholes, peace negotiations and the national DDR programme should determine the procedures related to the arsenals of armed groups, including heavy weapons and\/or caches of materiel. Processing heavy weapons and their ammunition requires a high level of technical knowledge. Heavy-weapons systems can be complex and require specialist expertise to ensure that systems are made safe, unloaded and all items of ammunition are safely separated from the platform. Conducting a thorough weapons survey and planning is vital to ensure the correct expertise is made available. The UN DDR component in mission settings or UN lead agency(ies) in non-mission settings should provide advice with regards to the collection, storage and disposal of heavy weapons, and support the development of any related SOPs. Procedures regarding heavy weapons should be clearly communicated to armed forces and groups prior to any disarmament operations to avoid unorganized and unscheduled movements of heavy weapons that might foment further tensions among the population. Destruction of heavy weapons requires significant logistics (see section 8); it is therefore critical to ensure the physical security of these weapons in order to reduce the risk of diversion.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -73560,14 +73560,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.2 Procedures for disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n To ensure comprehensive disarmament and avoid the exploitation of loopholes, peace negotiations and the national DDR programme should determine the procedures related to the arsenals of armed groups, including heavy weapons and\/or caches of materiel.", + "Sentence": "\n To ensure comprehensive disarmament and avoid the exploitation of loopholes, peace negotiations and the national DDR programme should determine the procedures related to the arsenals of armed groups, including heavy weapons and\/or caches of materiel.", "newParagraph": "box 6 processing heavy weapon ammunition n increasing number armed group area conflict across world use light heavy weapon including heavy artillery armoured fighting vehicle dealing heavy weapon present logistical political challenge certain setting heavy weapon could included eligibility criterion ddr programme ratio arm combatant could determined based number crew required operate specific weapon system however small arm light weapon generally seen individual asset heavy weapon often considered group asset thus may surrendered disarmament operation focus individual combatant person associated armed force group n ensure comprehensive disarmament avoid exploitation loophole peace negotiation national ddr programme determine procedure related arsenal armed group including heavy weapon andor cache materiel processing heavy weapon ammunition requires high level technical knowledge heavyweapons system complex require specialist expertise ensure system made safe unloaded item ammunition safely separated platform conducting thorough weapon survey planning vital ensure correct expertise made available un ddr component mission setting un lead agencyies nonmission setting provide advice regard collection storage disposal heavy weapon support development related sop procedure regarding heavy weapon clearly communicated armed force group prior disarmament operation avoid unorganized unscheduled movement heavy weapon might foment tension among population destruction heavy weapon requires significant logistics see section 8 therefore critical ensure physical security weapon order reduce risk diversion", "ProcessedSent": "n ensure comprehensive disarmament avoid exploitation loophole peace negotiation national ddr programme determine procedure related arsenal armed group including heavy weapon andor cache materiel", "SentID": 4086 }, { "ParagraphID": 1303, - "Paragraph": "BOX 6: PROCESSING HEAVY WEAPONS AND THEIR AMMUNITION \\n An increasing number of armed groups in areas of conflict across the world use light and heavy weapons, including heavy artillery or armoured fighting vehicles. Dealing with heavy weapons presents both logistical and political challenges. In certain settings, heavy weapons could be included in the eligibility criteria for a DDR programme, and the ratio of arms to combatants could be determined based on the number of crew required to operate each specific weapons system. However, while small arms and most light weapons are generally seen as an individual asset, heavy weapons are often considered a group asset, and thus may not be surrendered during disarmament operations that focus on individual combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups. \\n To ensure comprehensive disarmament and avoid the exploitation of loopholes, peace negotiations and the national DDR programme should determine the procedures related to the arsenals of armed groups, including heavy weapons and\/or caches of materiel. Processing heavy weapons and their ammunition requires a high level of technical knowledge. Heavy-weapons systems can be complex and require specialist expertise to ensure that systems are made safe, unloaded and all items of ammunition are safely separated from the platform. Conducting a thorough weapons survey and planning is vital to ensure the correct expertise is made available. The UN DDR component in mission settings or UN lead agency(ies) in non-mission settings should provide advice with regards to the collection, storage and disposal of heavy weapons, and support the development of any related SOPs. Procedures regarding heavy weapons should be clearly communicated to armed forces and groups prior to any disarmament operations to avoid unorganized and unscheduled movements of heavy weapons that might foment further tensions among the population. Destruction of heavy weapons requires significant logistics (see section 8); it is therefore critical to ensure the physical security of these weapons in order to reduce the risk of diversion.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 6: PROCESSING HEAVY WEAPONS AND THEIR AMMUNITION \n An increasing number of armed groups in areas of conflict across the world use light and heavy weapons, including heavy artillery or armoured fighting vehicles. Dealing with heavy weapons presents both logistical and political challenges. In certain settings, heavy weapons could be included in the eligibility criteria for a DDR programme, and the ratio of arms to combatants could be determined based on the number of crew required to operate each specific weapons system. However, while small arms and most light weapons are generally seen as an individual asset, heavy weapons are often considered a group asset, and thus may not be surrendered during disarmament operations that focus on individual combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups. \n To ensure comprehensive disarmament and avoid the exploitation of loopholes, peace negotiations and the national DDR programme should determine the procedures related to the arsenals of armed groups, including heavy weapons and\/or caches of materiel. Processing heavy weapons and their ammunition requires a high level of technical knowledge. Heavy-weapons systems can be complex and require specialist expertise to ensure that systems are made safe, unloaded and all items of ammunition are safely separated from the platform. Conducting a thorough weapons survey and planning is vital to ensure the correct expertise is made available. The UN DDR component in mission settings or UN lead agency(ies) in non-mission settings should provide advice with regards to the collection, storage and disposal of heavy weapons, and support the development of any related SOPs. Procedures regarding heavy weapons should be clearly communicated to armed forces and groups prior to any disarmament operations to avoid unorganized and unscheduled movements of heavy weapons that might foment further tensions among the population. Destruction of heavy weapons requires significant logistics (see section 8); it is therefore critical to ensure the physical security of these weapons in order to reduce the risk of diversion.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -73585,7 +73585,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1303, - "Paragraph": "BOX 6: PROCESSING HEAVY WEAPONS AND THEIR AMMUNITION \\n An increasing number of armed groups in areas of conflict across the world use light and heavy weapons, including heavy artillery or armoured fighting vehicles. Dealing with heavy weapons presents both logistical and political challenges. In certain settings, heavy weapons could be included in the eligibility criteria for a DDR programme, and the ratio of arms to combatants could be determined based on the number of crew required to operate each specific weapons system. However, while small arms and most light weapons are generally seen as an individual asset, heavy weapons are often considered a group asset, and thus may not be surrendered during disarmament operations that focus on individual combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups. \\n To ensure comprehensive disarmament and avoid the exploitation of loopholes, peace negotiations and the national DDR programme should determine the procedures related to the arsenals of armed groups, including heavy weapons and\/or caches of materiel. Processing heavy weapons and their ammunition requires a high level of technical knowledge. Heavy-weapons systems can be complex and require specialist expertise to ensure that systems are made safe, unloaded and all items of ammunition are safely separated from the platform. Conducting a thorough weapons survey and planning is vital to ensure the correct expertise is made available. The UN DDR component in mission settings or UN lead agency(ies) in non-mission settings should provide advice with regards to the collection, storage and disposal of heavy weapons, and support the development of any related SOPs. Procedures regarding heavy weapons should be clearly communicated to armed forces and groups prior to any disarmament operations to avoid unorganized and unscheduled movements of heavy weapons that might foment further tensions among the population. Destruction of heavy weapons requires significant logistics (see section 8); it is therefore critical to ensure the physical security of these weapons in order to reduce the risk of diversion.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 6: PROCESSING HEAVY WEAPONS AND THEIR AMMUNITION \n An increasing number of armed groups in areas of conflict across the world use light and heavy weapons, including heavy artillery or armoured fighting vehicles. Dealing with heavy weapons presents both logistical and political challenges. In certain settings, heavy weapons could be included in the eligibility criteria for a DDR programme, and the ratio of arms to combatants could be determined based on the number of crew required to operate each specific weapons system. However, while small arms and most light weapons are generally seen as an individual asset, heavy weapons are often considered a group asset, and thus may not be surrendered during disarmament operations that focus on individual combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups. \n To ensure comprehensive disarmament and avoid the exploitation of loopholes, peace negotiations and the national DDR programme should determine the procedures related to the arsenals of armed groups, including heavy weapons and\/or caches of materiel. Processing heavy weapons and their ammunition requires a high level of technical knowledge. Heavy-weapons systems can be complex and require specialist expertise to ensure that systems are made safe, unloaded and all items of ammunition are safely separated from the platform. Conducting a thorough weapons survey and planning is vital to ensure the correct expertise is made available. The UN DDR component in mission settings or UN lead agency(ies) in non-mission settings should provide advice with regards to the collection, storage and disposal of heavy weapons, and support the development of any related SOPs. Procedures regarding heavy weapons should be clearly communicated to armed forces and groups prior to any disarmament operations to avoid unorganized and unscheduled movements of heavy weapons that might foment further tensions among the population. Destruction of heavy weapons requires significant logistics (see section 8); it is therefore critical to ensure the physical security of these weapons in order to reduce the risk of diversion.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -73603,7 +73603,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1303, - "Paragraph": "BOX 6: PROCESSING HEAVY WEAPONS AND THEIR AMMUNITION \\n An increasing number of armed groups in areas of conflict across the world use light and heavy weapons, including heavy artillery or armoured fighting vehicles. Dealing with heavy weapons presents both logistical and political challenges. In certain settings, heavy weapons could be included in the eligibility criteria for a DDR programme, and the ratio of arms to combatants could be determined based on the number of crew required to operate each specific weapons system. However, while small arms and most light weapons are generally seen as an individual asset, heavy weapons are often considered a group asset, and thus may not be surrendered during disarmament operations that focus on individual combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups. \\n To ensure comprehensive disarmament and avoid the exploitation of loopholes, peace negotiations and the national DDR programme should determine the procedures related to the arsenals of armed groups, including heavy weapons and\/or caches of materiel. Processing heavy weapons and their ammunition requires a high level of technical knowledge. Heavy-weapons systems can be complex and require specialist expertise to ensure that systems are made safe, unloaded and all items of ammunition are safely separated from the platform. Conducting a thorough weapons survey and planning is vital to ensure the correct expertise is made available. The UN DDR component in mission settings or UN lead agency(ies) in non-mission settings should provide advice with regards to the collection, storage and disposal of heavy weapons, and support the development of any related SOPs. Procedures regarding heavy weapons should be clearly communicated to armed forces and groups prior to any disarmament operations to avoid unorganized and unscheduled movements of heavy weapons that might foment further tensions among the population. Destruction of heavy weapons requires significant logistics (see section 8); it is therefore critical to ensure the physical security of these weapons in order to reduce the risk of diversion.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 6: PROCESSING HEAVY WEAPONS AND THEIR AMMUNITION \n An increasing number of armed groups in areas of conflict across the world use light and heavy weapons, including heavy artillery or armoured fighting vehicles. Dealing with heavy weapons presents both logistical and political challenges. In certain settings, heavy weapons could be included in the eligibility criteria for a DDR programme, and the ratio of arms to combatants could be determined based on the number of crew required to operate each specific weapons system. However, while small arms and most light weapons are generally seen as an individual asset, heavy weapons are often considered a group asset, and thus may not be surrendered during disarmament operations that focus on individual combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups. \n To ensure comprehensive disarmament and avoid the exploitation of loopholes, peace negotiations and the national DDR programme should determine the procedures related to the arsenals of armed groups, including heavy weapons and\/or caches of materiel. Processing heavy weapons and their ammunition requires a high level of technical knowledge. Heavy-weapons systems can be complex and require specialist expertise to ensure that systems are made safe, unloaded and all items of ammunition are safely separated from the platform. Conducting a thorough weapons survey and planning is vital to ensure the correct expertise is made available. The UN DDR component in mission settings or UN lead agency(ies) in non-mission settings should provide advice with regards to the collection, storage and disposal of heavy weapons, and support the development of any related SOPs. Procedures regarding heavy weapons should be clearly communicated to armed forces and groups prior to any disarmament operations to avoid unorganized and unscheduled movements of heavy weapons that might foment further tensions among the population. Destruction of heavy weapons requires significant logistics (see section 8); it is therefore critical to ensure the physical security of these weapons in order to reduce the risk of diversion.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -73621,7 +73621,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1303, - "Paragraph": "BOX 6: PROCESSING HEAVY WEAPONS AND THEIR AMMUNITION \\n An increasing number of armed groups in areas of conflict across the world use light and heavy weapons, including heavy artillery or armoured fighting vehicles. Dealing with heavy weapons presents both logistical and political challenges. In certain settings, heavy weapons could be included in the eligibility criteria for a DDR programme, and the ratio of arms to combatants could be determined based on the number of crew required to operate each specific weapons system. However, while small arms and most light weapons are generally seen as an individual asset, heavy weapons are often considered a group asset, and thus may not be surrendered during disarmament operations that focus on individual combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups. \\n To ensure comprehensive disarmament and avoid the exploitation of loopholes, peace negotiations and the national DDR programme should determine the procedures related to the arsenals of armed groups, including heavy weapons and\/or caches of materiel. Processing heavy weapons and their ammunition requires a high level of technical knowledge. Heavy-weapons systems can be complex and require specialist expertise to ensure that systems are made safe, unloaded and all items of ammunition are safely separated from the platform. Conducting a thorough weapons survey and planning is vital to ensure the correct expertise is made available. The UN DDR component in mission settings or UN lead agency(ies) in non-mission settings should provide advice with regards to the collection, storage and disposal of heavy weapons, and support the development of any related SOPs. Procedures regarding heavy weapons should be clearly communicated to armed forces and groups prior to any disarmament operations to avoid unorganized and unscheduled movements of heavy weapons that might foment further tensions among the population. Destruction of heavy weapons requires significant logistics (see section 8); it is therefore critical to ensure the physical security of these weapons in order to reduce the risk of diversion.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 6: PROCESSING HEAVY WEAPONS AND THEIR AMMUNITION \n An increasing number of armed groups in areas of conflict across the world use light and heavy weapons, including heavy artillery or armoured fighting vehicles. Dealing with heavy weapons presents both logistical and political challenges. In certain settings, heavy weapons could be included in the eligibility criteria for a DDR programme, and the ratio of arms to combatants could be determined based on the number of crew required to operate each specific weapons system. However, while small arms and most light weapons are generally seen as an individual asset, heavy weapons are often considered a group asset, and thus may not be surrendered during disarmament operations that focus on individual combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups. \n To ensure comprehensive disarmament and avoid the exploitation of loopholes, peace negotiations and the national DDR programme should determine the procedures related to the arsenals of armed groups, including heavy weapons and\/or caches of materiel. Processing heavy weapons and their ammunition requires a high level of technical knowledge. Heavy-weapons systems can be complex and require specialist expertise to ensure that systems are made safe, unloaded and all items of ammunition are safely separated from the platform. Conducting a thorough weapons survey and planning is vital to ensure the correct expertise is made available. The UN DDR component in mission settings or UN lead agency(ies) in non-mission settings should provide advice with regards to the collection, storage and disposal of heavy weapons, and support the development of any related SOPs. Procedures regarding heavy weapons should be clearly communicated to armed forces and groups prior to any disarmament operations to avoid unorganized and unscheduled movements of heavy weapons that might foment further tensions among the population. Destruction of heavy weapons requires significant logistics (see section 8); it is therefore critical to ensure the physical security of these weapons in order to reduce the risk of diversion.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -73639,7 +73639,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1303, - "Paragraph": "BOX 6: PROCESSING HEAVY WEAPONS AND THEIR AMMUNITION \\n An increasing number of armed groups in areas of conflict across the world use light and heavy weapons, including heavy artillery or armoured fighting vehicles. Dealing with heavy weapons presents both logistical and political challenges. In certain settings, heavy weapons could be included in the eligibility criteria for a DDR programme, and the ratio of arms to combatants could be determined based on the number of crew required to operate each specific weapons system. However, while small arms and most light weapons are generally seen as an individual asset, heavy weapons are often considered a group asset, and thus may not be surrendered during disarmament operations that focus on individual combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups. \\n To ensure comprehensive disarmament and avoid the exploitation of loopholes, peace negotiations and the national DDR programme should determine the procedures related to the arsenals of armed groups, including heavy weapons and\/or caches of materiel. Processing heavy weapons and their ammunition requires a high level of technical knowledge. Heavy-weapons systems can be complex and require specialist expertise to ensure that systems are made safe, unloaded and all items of ammunition are safely separated from the platform. Conducting a thorough weapons survey and planning is vital to ensure the correct expertise is made available. The UN DDR component in mission settings or UN lead agency(ies) in non-mission settings should provide advice with regards to the collection, storage and disposal of heavy weapons, and support the development of any related SOPs. Procedures regarding heavy weapons should be clearly communicated to armed forces and groups prior to any disarmament operations to avoid unorganized and unscheduled movements of heavy weapons that might foment further tensions among the population. Destruction of heavy weapons requires significant logistics (see section 8); it is therefore critical to ensure the physical security of these weapons in order to reduce the risk of diversion.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 6: PROCESSING HEAVY WEAPONS AND THEIR AMMUNITION \n An increasing number of armed groups in areas of conflict across the world use light and heavy weapons, including heavy artillery or armoured fighting vehicles. Dealing with heavy weapons presents both logistical and political challenges. In certain settings, heavy weapons could be included in the eligibility criteria for a DDR programme, and the ratio of arms to combatants could be determined based on the number of crew required to operate each specific weapons system. However, while small arms and most light weapons are generally seen as an individual asset, heavy weapons are often considered a group asset, and thus may not be surrendered during disarmament operations that focus on individual combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups. \n To ensure comprehensive disarmament and avoid the exploitation of loopholes, peace negotiations and the national DDR programme should determine the procedures related to the arsenals of armed groups, including heavy weapons and\/or caches of materiel. Processing heavy weapons and their ammunition requires a high level of technical knowledge. Heavy-weapons systems can be complex and require specialist expertise to ensure that systems are made safe, unloaded and all items of ammunition are safely separated from the platform. Conducting a thorough weapons survey and planning is vital to ensure the correct expertise is made available. The UN DDR component in mission settings or UN lead agency(ies) in non-mission settings should provide advice with regards to the collection, storage and disposal of heavy weapons, and support the development of any related SOPs. Procedures regarding heavy weapons should be clearly communicated to armed forces and groups prior to any disarmament operations to avoid unorganized and unscheduled movements of heavy weapons that might foment further tensions among the population. Destruction of heavy weapons requires significant logistics (see section 8); it is therefore critical to ensure the physical security of these weapons in order to reduce the risk of diversion.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -73657,7 +73657,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1303, - "Paragraph": "BOX 6: PROCESSING HEAVY WEAPONS AND THEIR AMMUNITION \\n An increasing number of armed groups in areas of conflict across the world use light and heavy weapons, including heavy artillery or armoured fighting vehicles. Dealing with heavy weapons presents both logistical and political challenges. In certain settings, heavy weapons could be included in the eligibility criteria for a DDR programme, and the ratio of arms to combatants could be determined based on the number of crew required to operate each specific weapons system. However, while small arms and most light weapons are generally seen as an individual asset, heavy weapons are often considered a group asset, and thus may not be surrendered during disarmament operations that focus on individual combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups. \\n To ensure comprehensive disarmament and avoid the exploitation of loopholes, peace negotiations and the national DDR programme should determine the procedures related to the arsenals of armed groups, including heavy weapons and\/or caches of materiel. Processing heavy weapons and their ammunition requires a high level of technical knowledge. Heavy-weapons systems can be complex and require specialist expertise to ensure that systems are made safe, unloaded and all items of ammunition are safely separated from the platform. Conducting a thorough weapons survey and planning is vital to ensure the correct expertise is made available. The UN DDR component in mission settings or UN lead agency(ies) in non-mission settings should provide advice with regards to the collection, storage and disposal of heavy weapons, and support the development of any related SOPs. Procedures regarding heavy weapons should be clearly communicated to armed forces and groups prior to any disarmament operations to avoid unorganized and unscheduled movements of heavy weapons that might foment further tensions among the population. Destruction of heavy weapons requires significant logistics (see section 8); it is therefore critical to ensure the physical security of these weapons in order to reduce the risk of diversion.", + "Paragraph": "BOX 6: PROCESSING HEAVY WEAPONS AND THEIR AMMUNITION \n An increasing number of armed groups in areas of conflict across the world use light and heavy weapons, including heavy artillery or armoured fighting vehicles. Dealing with heavy weapons presents both logistical and political challenges. In certain settings, heavy weapons could be included in the eligibility criteria for a DDR programme, and the ratio of arms to combatants could be determined based on the number of crew required to operate each specific weapons system. However, while small arms and most light weapons are generally seen as an individual asset, heavy weapons are often considered a group asset, and thus may not be surrendered during disarmament operations that focus on individual combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups. \n To ensure comprehensive disarmament and avoid the exploitation of loopholes, peace negotiations and the national DDR programme should determine the procedures related to the arsenals of armed groups, including heavy weapons and\/or caches of materiel. Processing heavy weapons and their ammunition requires a high level of technical knowledge. Heavy-weapons systems can be complex and require specialist expertise to ensure that systems are made safe, unloaded and all items of ammunition are safely separated from the platform. Conducting a thorough weapons survey and planning is vital to ensure the correct expertise is made available. The UN DDR component in mission settings or UN lead agency(ies) in non-mission settings should provide advice with regards to the collection, storage and disposal of heavy weapons, and support the development of any related SOPs. Procedures regarding heavy weapons should be clearly communicated to armed forces and groups prior to any disarmament operations to avoid unorganized and unscheduled movements of heavy weapons that might foment further tensions among the population. Destruction of heavy weapons requires significant logistics (see section 8); it is therefore critical to ensure the physical security of these weapons in order to reduce the risk of diversion.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -75565,7 +75565,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1340, - "Paragraph": "Who should implement the weapons survey? \\n While the DDR component and specialized UN agencies can secure funding and coordinate the process, it is critical to ensure that ownership of the project sits at the national level due to the sensitivities involved, and so that the results have greater legitimacy in informing any future national policymaking on the subject. This could be through the National Coordinating Mechanism on SALW, for example, or the National DDR Commission. Buy-in must also be secured from local authorities on the ground where research is to be conducted. Such authorities must also be kept informed of developments for political and security reasons. \\n Weapons surveys are often sub-contracted out by UN agencies and national authorities to independent and impartial research organizations and\/or an expert consultant to design and coordinate the survey components. The survey team should include independent experts and surveyors who are nationals of the country in which the DDR component or the UN lead agency(ies) is operating and who speak the local language(s). The implementation of weapons surveys should always serve as an opportunity to develop national research capacity.", + "Paragraph": "Who should implement the weapons survey? \n While the DDR component and specialized UN agencies can secure funding and coordinate the process, it is critical to ensure that ownership of the project sits at the national level due to the sensitivities involved, and so that the results have greater legitimacy in informing any future national policymaking on the subject. This could be through the National Coordinating Mechanism on SALW, for example, or the National DDR Commission. Buy-in must also be secured from local authorities on the ground where research is to be conducted. Such authorities must also be kept informed of developments for political and security reasons. \n Weapons surveys are often sub-contracted out by UN agencies and national authorities to independent and impartial research organizations and\/or an expert consultant to design and coordinate the survey components. The survey team should include independent experts and surveyors who are nationals of the country in which the DDR component or the UN lead agency(ies) is operating and who speak the local language(s). The implementation of weapons surveys should always serve as an opportunity to develop national research capacity.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -75583,7 +75583,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1340, - "Paragraph": "Who should implement the weapons survey? \\n While the DDR component and specialized UN agencies can secure funding and coordinate the process, it is critical to ensure that ownership of the project sits at the national level due to the sensitivities involved, and so that the results have greater legitimacy in informing any future national policymaking on the subject. This could be through the National Coordinating Mechanism on SALW, for example, or the National DDR Commission. Buy-in must also be secured from local authorities on the ground where research is to be conducted. Such authorities must also be kept informed of developments for political and security reasons. \\n Weapons surveys are often sub-contracted out by UN agencies and national authorities to independent and impartial research organizations and\/or an expert consultant to design and coordinate the survey components. The survey team should include independent experts and surveyors who are nationals of the country in which the DDR component or the UN lead agency(ies) is operating and who speak the local language(s). The implementation of weapons surveys should always serve as an opportunity to develop national research capacity.", + "Paragraph": "Who should implement the weapons survey? \n While the DDR component and specialized UN agencies can secure funding and coordinate the process, it is critical to ensure that ownership of the project sits at the national level due to the sensitivities involved, and so that the results have greater legitimacy in informing any future national policymaking on the subject. This could be through the National Coordinating Mechanism on SALW, for example, or the National DDR Commission. Buy-in must also be secured from local authorities on the ground where research is to be conducted. Such authorities must also be kept informed of developments for political and security reasons. \n Weapons surveys are often sub-contracted out by UN agencies and national authorities to independent and impartial research organizations and\/or an expert consultant to design and coordinate the survey components. The survey team should include independent experts and surveyors who are nationals of the country in which the DDR component or the UN lead agency(ies) is operating and who speak the local language(s). The implementation of weapons surveys should always serve as an opportunity to develop national research capacity.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -75594,14 +75594,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n While the DDR component and specialized UN agencies can secure funding and coordinate the process, it is critical to ensure that ownership of the project sits at the national level due to the sensitivities involved, and so that the results have greater legitimacy in informing any future national policymaking on the subject.", + "Sentence": "\n While the DDR component and specialized UN agencies can secure funding and coordinate the process, it is critical to ensure that ownership of the project sits at the national level due to the sensitivities involved, and so that the results have greater legitimacy in informing any future national policymaking on the subject.", "newParagraph": "implement weapon survey n ddr component specialized un agency secure funding coordinate process critical ensure ownership project sits national level due sensitivity involved result greater legitimacy informing future national policymaking subject could national coordinating mechanism salw example national ddr commission buyin must also secured local authority ground research conducted authority must also kept informed development political security reason n weapon survey often subcontracted un agency national authority independent impartial research organization andor expert consultant design coordinate survey component survey team include independent expert surveyor national country ddr component un lead agencyies operating speak local language implementation weapon survey always serve opportunity develop national research capacity", "ProcessedSent": "n ddr component specialized un agency secure funding coordinate process critical ensure ownership project sits national level due sensitivity involved result greater legitimacy informing future national policymaking subject", "SentID": 4199 }, { "ParagraphID": 1340, - "Paragraph": "Who should implement the weapons survey? \\n While the DDR component and specialized UN agencies can secure funding and coordinate the process, it is critical to ensure that ownership of the project sits at the national level due to the sensitivities involved, and so that the results have greater legitimacy in informing any future national policymaking on the subject. This could be through the National Coordinating Mechanism on SALW, for example, or the National DDR Commission. Buy-in must also be secured from local authorities on the ground where research is to be conducted. Such authorities must also be kept informed of developments for political and security reasons. \\n Weapons surveys are often sub-contracted out by UN agencies and national authorities to independent and impartial research organizations and\/or an expert consultant to design and coordinate the survey components. The survey team should include independent experts and surveyors who are nationals of the country in which the DDR component or the UN lead agency(ies) is operating and who speak the local language(s). The implementation of weapons surveys should always serve as an opportunity to develop national research capacity.", + "Paragraph": "Who should implement the weapons survey? \n While the DDR component and specialized UN agencies can secure funding and coordinate the process, it is critical to ensure that ownership of the project sits at the national level due to the sensitivities involved, and so that the results have greater legitimacy in informing any future national policymaking on the subject. This could be through the National Coordinating Mechanism on SALW, for example, or the National DDR Commission. Buy-in must also be secured from local authorities on the ground where research is to be conducted. Such authorities must also be kept informed of developments for political and security reasons. \n Weapons surveys are often sub-contracted out by UN agencies and national authorities to independent and impartial research organizations and\/or an expert consultant to design and coordinate the survey components. The survey team should include independent experts and surveyors who are nationals of the country in which the DDR component or the UN lead agency(ies) is operating and who speak the local language(s). The implementation of weapons surveys should always serve as an opportunity to develop national research capacity.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -75619,7 +75619,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1340, - "Paragraph": "Who should implement the weapons survey? \\n While the DDR component and specialized UN agencies can secure funding and coordinate the process, it is critical to ensure that ownership of the project sits at the national level due to the sensitivities involved, and so that the results have greater legitimacy in informing any future national policymaking on the subject. This could be through the National Coordinating Mechanism on SALW, for example, or the National DDR Commission. Buy-in must also be secured from local authorities on the ground where research is to be conducted. Such authorities must also be kept informed of developments for political and security reasons. \\n Weapons surveys are often sub-contracted out by UN agencies and national authorities to independent and impartial research organizations and\/or an expert consultant to design and coordinate the survey components. The survey team should include independent experts and surveyors who are nationals of the country in which the DDR component or the UN lead agency(ies) is operating and who speak the local language(s). The implementation of weapons surveys should always serve as an opportunity to develop national research capacity.", + "Paragraph": "Who should implement the weapons survey? \n While the DDR component and specialized UN agencies can secure funding and coordinate the process, it is critical to ensure that ownership of the project sits at the national level due to the sensitivities involved, and so that the results have greater legitimacy in informing any future national policymaking on the subject. This could be through the National Coordinating Mechanism on SALW, for example, or the National DDR Commission. Buy-in must also be secured from local authorities on the ground where research is to be conducted. Such authorities must also be kept informed of developments for political and security reasons. \n Weapons surveys are often sub-contracted out by UN agencies and national authorities to independent and impartial research organizations and\/or an expert consultant to design and coordinate the survey components. The survey team should include independent experts and surveyors who are nationals of the country in which the DDR component or the UN lead agency(ies) is operating and who speak the local language(s). The implementation of weapons surveys should always serve as an opportunity to develop national research capacity.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -75637,7 +75637,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1340, - "Paragraph": "Who should implement the weapons survey? \\n While the DDR component and specialized UN agencies can secure funding and coordinate the process, it is critical to ensure that ownership of the project sits at the national level due to the sensitivities involved, and so that the results have greater legitimacy in informing any future national policymaking on the subject. This could be through the National Coordinating Mechanism on SALW, for example, or the National DDR Commission. Buy-in must also be secured from local authorities on the ground where research is to be conducted. Such authorities must also be kept informed of developments for political and security reasons. \\n Weapons surveys are often sub-contracted out by UN agencies and national authorities to independent and impartial research organizations and\/or an expert consultant to design and coordinate the survey components. The survey team should include independent experts and surveyors who are nationals of the country in which the DDR component or the UN lead agency(ies) is operating and who speak the local language(s). The implementation of weapons surveys should always serve as an opportunity to develop national research capacity.", + "Paragraph": "Who should implement the weapons survey? \n While the DDR component and specialized UN agencies can secure funding and coordinate the process, it is critical to ensure that ownership of the project sits at the national level due to the sensitivities involved, and so that the results have greater legitimacy in informing any future national policymaking on the subject. This could be through the National Coordinating Mechanism on SALW, for example, or the National DDR Commission. Buy-in must also be secured from local authorities on the ground where research is to be conducted. Such authorities must also be kept informed of developments for political and security reasons. \n Weapons surveys are often sub-contracted out by UN agencies and national authorities to independent and impartial research organizations and\/or an expert consultant to design and coordinate the survey components. The survey team should include independent experts and surveyors who are nationals of the country in which the DDR component or the UN lead agency(ies) is operating and who speak the local language(s). The implementation of weapons surveys should always serve as an opportunity to develop national research capacity.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -75655,7 +75655,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1340, - "Paragraph": "Who should implement the weapons survey? \\n While the DDR component and specialized UN agencies can secure funding and coordinate the process, it is critical to ensure that ownership of the project sits at the national level due to the sensitivities involved, and so that the results have greater legitimacy in informing any future national policymaking on the subject. This could be through the National Coordinating Mechanism on SALW, for example, or the National DDR Commission. Buy-in must also be secured from local authorities on the ground where research is to be conducted. Such authorities must also be kept informed of developments for political and security reasons. \\n Weapons surveys are often sub-contracted out by UN agencies and national authorities to independent and impartial research organizations and\/or an expert consultant to design and coordinate the survey components. The survey team should include independent experts and surveyors who are nationals of the country in which the DDR component or the UN lead agency(ies) is operating and who speak the local language(s). The implementation of weapons surveys should always serve as an opportunity to develop national research capacity.", + "Paragraph": "Who should implement the weapons survey? \n While the DDR component and specialized UN agencies can secure funding and coordinate the process, it is critical to ensure that ownership of the project sits at the national level due to the sensitivities involved, and so that the results have greater legitimacy in informing any future national policymaking on the subject. This could be through the National Coordinating Mechanism on SALW, for example, or the National DDR Commission. Buy-in must also be secured from local authorities on the ground where research is to be conducted. Such authorities must also be kept informed of developments for political and security reasons. \n Weapons surveys are often sub-contracted out by UN agencies and national authorities to independent and impartial research organizations and\/or an expert consultant to design and coordinate the survey components. The survey team should include independent experts and surveyors who are nationals of the country in which the DDR component or the UN lead agency(ies) is operating and who speak the local language(s). The implementation of weapons surveys should always serve as an opportunity to develop national research capacity.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -75666,14 +75666,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Weapons surveys are often sub-contracted out by UN agencies and national authorities to independent and impartial research organizations and\/or an expert consultant to design and coordinate the survey components.", + "Sentence": "\n Weapons surveys are often sub-contracted out by UN agencies and national authorities to independent and impartial research organizations and\/or an expert consultant to design and coordinate the survey components.", "newParagraph": "implement weapon survey n ddr component specialized un agency secure funding coordinate process critical ensure ownership project sits national level due sensitivity involved result greater legitimacy informing future national policymaking subject could national coordinating mechanism salw example national ddr commission buyin must also secured local authority ground research conducted authority must also kept informed development political security reason n weapon survey often subcontracted un agency national authority independent impartial research organization andor expert consultant design coordinate survey component survey team include independent expert surveyor national country ddr component un lead agencyies operating speak local language implementation weapon survey always serve opportunity develop national research capacity", "ProcessedSent": "n weapon survey often subcontracted un agency national authority independent impartial research organization andor expert consultant design coordinate survey component", "SentID": 4203 }, { "ParagraphID": 1340, - "Paragraph": "Who should implement the weapons survey? \\n While the DDR component and specialized UN agencies can secure funding and coordinate the process, it is critical to ensure that ownership of the project sits at the national level due to the sensitivities involved, and so that the results have greater legitimacy in informing any future national policymaking on the subject. This could be through the National Coordinating Mechanism on SALW, for example, or the National DDR Commission. Buy-in must also be secured from local authorities on the ground where research is to be conducted. Such authorities must also be kept informed of developments for political and security reasons. \\n Weapons surveys are often sub-contracted out by UN agencies and national authorities to independent and impartial research organizations and\/or an expert consultant to design and coordinate the survey components. The survey team should include independent experts and surveyors who are nationals of the country in which the DDR component or the UN lead agency(ies) is operating and who speak the local language(s). The implementation of weapons surveys should always serve as an opportunity to develop national research capacity.", + "Paragraph": "Who should implement the weapons survey? \n While the DDR component and specialized UN agencies can secure funding and coordinate the process, it is critical to ensure that ownership of the project sits at the national level due to the sensitivities involved, and so that the results have greater legitimacy in informing any future national policymaking on the subject. This could be through the National Coordinating Mechanism on SALW, for example, or the National DDR Commission. Buy-in must also be secured from local authorities on the ground where research is to be conducted. Such authorities must also be kept informed of developments for political and security reasons. \n Weapons surveys are often sub-contracted out by UN agencies and national authorities to independent and impartial research organizations and\/or an expert consultant to design and coordinate the survey components. The survey team should include independent experts and surveyors who are nationals of the country in which the DDR component or the UN lead agency(ies) is operating and who speak the local language(s). The implementation of weapons surveys should always serve as an opportunity to develop national research capacity.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -75691,7 +75691,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1340, - "Paragraph": "Who should implement the weapons survey? \\n While the DDR component and specialized UN agencies can secure funding and coordinate the process, it is critical to ensure that ownership of the project sits at the national level due to the sensitivities involved, and so that the results have greater legitimacy in informing any future national policymaking on the subject. This could be through the National Coordinating Mechanism on SALW, for example, or the National DDR Commission. Buy-in must also be secured from local authorities on the ground where research is to be conducted. Such authorities must also be kept informed of developments for political and security reasons. \\n Weapons surveys are often sub-contracted out by UN agencies and national authorities to independent and impartial research organizations and\/or an expert consultant to design and coordinate the survey components. The survey team should include independent experts and surveyors who are nationals of the country in which the DDR component or the UN lead agency(ies) is operating and who speak the local language(s). The implementation of weapons surveys should always serve as an opportunity to develop national research capacity.", + "Paragraph": "Who should implement the weapons survey? \n While the DDR component and specialized UN agencies can secure funding and coordinate the process, it is critical to ensure that ownership of the project sits at the national level due to the sensitivities involved, and so that the results have greater legitimacy in informing any future national policymaking on the subject. This could be through the National Coordinating Mechanism on SALW, for example, or the National DDR Commission. Buy-in must also be secured from local authorities on the ground where research is to be conducted. Such authorities must also be kept informed of developments for political and security reasons. \n Weapons surveys are often sub-contracted out by UN agencies and national authorities to independent and impartial research organizations and\/or an expert consultant to design and coordinate the survey components. The survey team should include independent experts and surveyors who are nationals of the country in which the DDR component or the UN lead agency(ies) is operating and who speak the local language(s). The implementation of weapons surveys should always serve as an opportunity to develop national research capacity.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -75709,7 +75709,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1341, - "Paragraph": "What information should be gathered during a weapons survey? \\n Weapons surveys can support the design of multiple types of activities related to SALW control in various contexts, including those related to DDR. The information collected during this process can inform a wide range of initiatives, and it is therefore important to identify other UN stakeholders with whom to engage when designing the survey to avoid duplication of effort. \\n\\n Components \\n Contextual analysis: conflict analysis; mapping of armed actors; political, economic, social, environmental, cultural factors. \\n Weapons distribution assessment: types; quantities; possession by men, women and children; movements of SALW; illicit sources of weapons and ammunition; potential locations of materiel and caches. \\n Impact survey: impact of weapons on children, women, men, vulnerable groups, DDR beneficiaries etc.; social and economic developments; number of acts of armed violence and victims. \\n Perception survey: attitudes of various groups towards weapons; reasons for armed groups holding weapons; alternatives to weapons possession etc. \\n Capacity assessment: community, local, national coping mechanism; legal tools; security and non-security responses.", + "Paragraph": "What information should be gathered during a weapons survey? \n Weapons surveys can support the design of multiple types of activities related to SALW control in various contexts, including those related to DDR. The information collected during this process can inform a wide range of initiatives, and it is therefore important to identify other UN stakeholders with whom to engage when designing the survey to avoid duplication of effort. \n\n Components \n Contextual analysis: conflict analysis; mapping of armed actors; political, economic, social, environmental, cultural factors. \n Weapons distribution assessment: types; quantities; possession by men, women and children; movements of SALW; illicit sources of weapons and ammunition; potential locations of materiel and caches. \n Impact survey: impact of weapons on children, women, men, vulnerable groups, DDR beneficiaries etc.; social and economic developments; number of acts of armed violence and victims. \n Perception survey: attitudes of various groups towards weapons; reasons for armed groups holding weapons; alternatives to weapons possession etc. \n Capacity assessment: community, local, national coping mechanism; legal tools; security and non-security responses.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -75727,7 +75727,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1341, - "Paragraph": "What information should be gathered during a weapons survey? \\n Weapons surveys can support the design of multiple types of activities related to SALW control in various contexts, including those related to DDR. The information collected during this process can inform a wide range of initiatives, and it is therefore important to identify other UN stakeholders with whom to engage when designing the survey to avoid duplication of effort. \\n\\n Components \\n Contextual analysis: conflict analysis; mapping of armed actors; political, economic, social, environmental, cultural factors. \\n Weapons distribution assessment: types; quantities; possession by men, women and children; movements of SALW; illicit sources of weapons and ammunition; potential locations of materiel and caches. \\n Impact survey: impact of weapons on children, women, men, vulnerable groups, DDR beneficiaries etc.; social and economic developments; number of acts of armed violence and victims. \\n Perception survey: attitudes of various groups towards weapons; reasons for armed groups holding weapons; alternatives to weapons possession etc. \\n Capacity assessment: community, local, national coping mechanism; legal tools; security and non-security responses.", + "Paragraph": "What information should be gathered during a weapons survey? \n Weapons surveys can support the design of multiple types of activities related to SALW control in various contexts, including those related to DDR. The information collected during this process can inform a wide range of initiatives, and it is therefore important to identify other UN stakeholders with whom to engage when designing the survey to avoid duplication of effort. \n\n Components \n Contextual analysis: conflict analysis; mapping of armed actors; political, economic, social, environmental, cultural factors. \n Weapons distribution assessment: types; quantities; possession by men, women and children; movements of SALW; illicit sources of weapons and ammunition; potential locations of materiel and caches. \n Impact survey: impact of weapons on children, women, men, vulnerable groups, DDR beneficiaries etc.; social and economic developments; number of acts of armed violence and victims. \n Perception survey: attitudes of various groups towards weapons; reasons for armed groups holding weapons; alternatives to weapons possession etc. \n Capacity assessment: community, local, national coping mechanism; legal tools; security and non-security responses.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -75738,14 +75738,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Weapons surveys can support the design of multiple types of activities related to SALW control in various contexts, including those related to DDR.", + "Sentence": "\n Weapons surveys can support the design of multiple types of activities related to SALW control in various contexts, including those related to DDR.", "newParagraph": "information gathered weapon survey n weapon survey support design multiple type activity related salw control various context including related ddr information collected process inform wide range initiative therefore important identify un stakeholder engage designing survey avoid duplication effort nn component n contextual analysis conflict analysis mapping armed actor political economic social environmental cultural factor n weapon distribution assessment type quantity possession men woman child movement salw illicit source weapon ammunition potential location materiel cache n impact survey impact weapon child woman men vulnerable group ddr beneficiary etc social economic development number act armed violence victim n perception survey attitude various group towards weapon reason armed group holding weapon alternative weapon possession etc n capacity assessment community local national coping mechanism legal tool security nonsecurity response", "ProcessedSent": "n weapon survey support design multiple type activity related salw control various context including related ddr", "SentID": 4207 }, { "ParagraphID": 1341, - "Paragraph": "What information should be gathered during a weapons survey? \\n Weapons surveys can support the design of multiple types of activities related to SALW control in various contexts, including those related to DDR. The information collected during this process can inform a wide range of initiatives, and it is therefore important to identify other UN stakeholders with whom to engage when designing the survey to avoid duplication of effort. \\n\\n Components \\n Contextual analysis: conflict analysis; mapping of armed actors; political, economic, social, environmental, cultural factors. \\n Weapons distribution assessment: types; quantities; possession by men, women and children; movements of SALW; illicit sources of weapons and ammunition; potential locations of materiel and caches. \\n Impact survey: impact of weapons on children, women, men, vulnerable groups, DDR beneficiaries etc.; social and economic developments; number of acts of armed violence and victims. \\n Perception survey: attitudes of various groups towards weapons; reasons for armed groups holding weapons; alternatives to weapons possession etc. \\n Capacity assessment: community, local, national coping mechanism; legal tools; security and non-security responses.", + "Paragraph": "What information should be gathered during a weapons survey? \n Weapons surveys can support the design of multiple types of activities related to SALW control in various contexts, including those related to DDR. The information collected during this process can inform a wide range of initiatives, and it is therefore important to identify other UN stakeholders with whom to engage when designing the survey to avoid duplication of effort. \n\n Components \n Contextual analysis: conflict analysis; mapping of armed actors; political, economic, social, environmental, cultural factors. \n Weapons distribution assessment: types; quantities; possession by men, women and children; movements of SALW; illicit sources of weapons and ammunition; potential locations of materiel and caches. \n Impact survey: impact of weapons on children, women, men, vulnerable groups, DDR beneficiaries etc.; social and economic developments; number of acts of armed violence and victims. \n Perception survey: attitudes of various groups towards weapons; reasons for armed groups holding weapons; alternatives to weapons possession etc. \n Capacity assessment: community, local, national coping mechanism; legal tools; security and non-security responses.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -75763,7 +75763,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1341, - "Paragraph": "What information should be gathered during a weapons survey? \\n Weapons surveys can support the design of multiple types of activities related to SALW control in various contexts, including those related to DDR. The information collected during this process can inform a wide range of initiatives, and it is therefore important to identify other UN stakeholders with whom to engage when designing the survey to avoid duplication of effort. \\n\\n Components \\n Contextual analysis: conflict analysis; mapping of armed actors; political, economic, social, environmental, cultural factors. \\n Weapons distribution assessment: types; quantities; possession by men, women and children; movements of SALW; illicit sources of weapons and ammunition; potential locations of materiel and caches. \\n Impact survey: impact of weapons on children, women, men, vulnerable groups, DDR beneficiaries etc.; social and economic developments; number of acts of armed violence and victims. \\n Perception survey: attitudes of various groups towards weapons; reasons for armed groups holding weapons; alternatives to weapons possession etc. \\n Capacity assessment: community, local, national coping mechanism; legal tools; security and non-security responses.", + "Paragraph": "What information should be gathered during a weapons survey? \n Weapons surveys can support the design of multiple types of activities related to SALW control in various contexts, including those related to DDR. The information collected during this process can inform a wide range of initiatives, and it is therefore important to identify other UN stakeholders with whom to engage when designing the survey to avoid duplication of effort. \n\n Components \n Contextual analysis: conflict analysis; mapping of armed actors; political, economic, social, environmental, cultural factors. \n Weapons distribution assessment: types; quantities; possession by men, women and children; movements of SALW; illicit sources of weapons and ammunition; potential locations of materiel and caches. \n Impact survey: impact of weapons on children, women, men, vulnerable groups, DDR beneficiaries etc.; social and economic developments; number of acts of armed violence and victims. \n Perception survey: attitudes of various groups towards weapons; reasons for armed groups holding weapons; alternatives to weapons possession etc. \n Capacity assessment: community, local, national coping mechanism; legal tools; security and non-security responses.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -75774,14 +75774,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Components \\n Contextual analysis: conflict analysis; mapping of armed actors; political, economic, social, environmental, cultural factors.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Components \n Contextual analysis: conflict analysis; mapping of armed actors; political, economic, social, environmental, cultural factors.", "newParagraph": "information gathered weapon survey n weapon survey support design multiple type activity related salw control various context including related ddr information collected process inform wide range initiative therefore important identify un stakeholder engage designing survey avoid duplication effort nn component n contextual analysis conflict analysis mapping armed actor political economic social environmental cultural factor n weapon distribution assessment type quantity possession men woman child movement salw illicit source weapon ammunition potential location materiel cache n impact survey impact weapon child woman men vulnerable group ddr beneficiary etc social economic development number act armed violence victim n perception survey attitude various group towards weapon reason armed group holding weapon alternative weapon possession etc n capacity assessment community local national coping mechanism legal tool security nonsecurity response", "ProcessedSent": "nn component n contextual analysis conflict analysis mapping armed actor political economic social environmental cultural factor", "SentID": 4209 }, { "ParagraphID": 1341, - "Paragraph": "What information should be gathered during a weapons survey? \\n Weapons surveys can support the design of multiple types of activities related to SALW control in various contexts, including those related to DDR. The information collected during this process can inform a wide range of initiatives, and it is therefore important to identify other UN stakeholders with whom to engage when designing the survey to avoid duplication of effort. \\n\\n Components \\n Contextual analysis: conflict analysis; mapping of armed actors; political, economic, social, environmental, cultural factors. \\n Weapons distribution assessment: types; quantities; possession by men, women and children; movements of SALW; illicit sources of weapons and ammunition; potential locations of materiel and caches. \\n Impact survey: impact of weapons on children, women, men, vulnerable groups, DDR beneficiaries etc.; social and economic developments; number of acts of armed violence and victims. \\n Perception survey: attitudes of various groups towards weapons; reasons for armed groups holding weapons; alternatives to weapons possession etc. \\n Capacity assessment: community, local, national coping mechanism; legal tools; security and non-security responses.", + "Paragraph": "What information should be gathered during a weapons survey? \n Weapons surveys can support the design of multiple types of activities related to SALW control in various contexts, including those related to DDR. The information collected during this process can inform a wide range of initiatives, and it is therefore important to identify other UN stakeholders with whom to engage when designing the survey to avoid duplication of effort. \n\n Components \n Contextual analysis: conflict analysis; mapping of armed actors; political, economic, social, environmental, cultural factors. \n Weapons distribution assessment: types; quantities; possession by men, women and children; movements of SALW; illicit sources of weapons and ammunition; potential locations of materiel and caches. \n Impact survey: impact of weapons on children, women, men, vulnerable groups, DDR beneficiaries etc.; social and economic developments; number of acts of armed violence and victims. \n Perception survey: attitudes of various groups towards weapons; reasons for armed groups holding weapons; alternatives to weapons possession etc. \n Capacity assessment: community, local, national coping mechanism; legal tools; security and non-security responses.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -75792,14 +75792,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Weapons distribution assessment: types; quantities; possession by men, women and children; movements of SALW; illicit sources of weapons and ammunition; potential locations of materiel and caches.", + "Sentence": "\n Weapons distribution assessment: types; quantities; possession by men, women and children; movements of SALW; illicit sources of weapons and ammunition; potential locations of materiel and caches.", "newParagraph": "information gathered weapon survey n weapon survey support design multiple type activity related salw control various context including related ddr information collected process inform wide range initiative therefore important identify un stakeholder engage designing survey avoid duplication effort nn component n contextual analysis conflict analysis mapping armed actor political economic social environmental cultural factor n weapon distribution assessment type quantity possession men woman child movement salw illicit source weapon ammunition potential location materiel cache n impact survey impact weapon child woman men vulnerable group ddr beneficiary etc social economic development number act armed violence victim n perception survey attitude various group towards weapon reason armed group holding weapon alternative weapon possession etc n capacity assessment community local national coping mechanism legal tool security nonsecurity response", "ProcessedSent": "n weapon distribution assessment type quantity possession men woman child movement salw illicit source weapon ammunition potential location materiel cache", "SentID": 4210 }, { "ParagraphID": 1341, - "Paragraph": "What information should be gathered during a weapons survey? \\n Weapons surveys can support the design of multiple types of activities related to SALW control in various contexts, including those related to DDR. The information collected during this process can inform a wide range of initiatives, and it is therefore important to identify other UN stakeholders with whom to engage when designing the survey to avoid duplication of effort. \\n\\n Components \\n Contextual analysis: conflict analysis; mapping of armed actors; political, economic, social, environmental, cultural factors. \\n Weapons distribution assessment: types; quantities; possession by men, women and children; movements of SALW; illicit sources of weapons and ammunition; potential locations of materiel and caches. \\n Impact survey: impact of weapons on children, women, men, vulnerable groups, DDR beneficiaries etc.; social and economic developments; number of acts of armed violence and victims. \\n Perception survey: attitudes of various groups towards weapons; reasons for armed groups holding weapons; alternatives to weapons possession etc. \\n Capacity assessment: community, local, national coping mechanism; legal tools; security and non-security responses.", + "Paragraph": "What information should be gathered during a weapons survey? \n Weapons surveys can support the design of multiple types of activities related to SALW control in various contexts, including those related to DDR. The information collected during this process can inform a wide range of initiatives, and it is therefore important to identify other UN stakeholders with whom to engage when designing the survey to avoid duplication of effort. \n\n Components \n Contextual analysis: conflict analysis; mapping of armed actors; political, economic, social, environmental, cultural factors. \n Weapons distribution assessment: types; quantities; possession by men, women and children; movements of SALW; illicit sources of weapons and ammunition; potential locations of materiel and caches. \n Impact survey: impact of weapons on children, women, men, vulnerable groups, DDR beneficiaries etc.; social and economic developments; number of acts of armed violence and victims. \n Perception survey: attitudes of various groups towards weapons; reasons for armed groups holding weapons; alternatives to weapons possession etc. \n Capacity assessment: community, local, national coping mechanism; legal tools; security and non-security responses.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -75810,14 +75810,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Impact survey: impact of weapons on children, women, men, vulnerable groups, DDR beneficiaries etc.", + "Sentence": "\n Impact survey: impact of weapons on children, women, men, vulnerable groups, DDR beneficiaries etc.", "newParagraph": "information gathered weapon survey n weapon survey support design multiple type activity related salw control various context including related ddr information collected process inform wide range initiative therefore important identify un stakeholder engage designing survey avoid duplication effort nn component n contextual analysis conflict analysis mapping armed actor political economic social environmental cultural factor n weapon distribution assessment type quantity possession men woman child movement salw illicit source weapon ammunition potential location materiel cache n impact survey impact weapon child woman men vulnerable group ddr beneficiary etc social economic development number act armed violence victim n perception survey attitude various group towards weapon reason armed group holding weapon alternative weapon possession etc n capacity assessment community local national coping mechanism legal tool security nonsecurity response", "ProcessedSent": "n impact survey impact weapon child woman men vulnerable group ddr beneficiary etc", "SentID": 4211 }, { "ParagraphID": 1341, - "Paragraph": "What information should be gathered during a weapons survey? \\n Weapons surveys can support the design of multiple types of activities related to SALW control in various contexts, including those related to DDR. The information collected during this process can inform a wide range of initiatives, and it is therefore important to identify other UN stakeholders with whom to engage when designing the survey to avoid duplication of effort. \\n\\n Components \\n Contextual analysis: conflict analysis; mapping of armed actors; political, economic, social, environmental, cultural factors. \\n Weapons distribution assessment: types; quantities; possession by men, women and children; movements of SALW; illicit sources of weapons and ammunition; potential locations of materiel and caches. \\n Impact survey: impact of weapons on children, women, men, vulnerable groups, DDR beneficiaries etc.; social and economic developments; number of acts of armed violence and victims. \\n Perception survey: attitudes of various groups towards weapons; reasons for armed groups holding weapons; alternatives to weapons possession etc. \\n Capacity assessment: community, local, national coping mechanism; legal tools; security and non-security responses.", + "Paragraph": "What information should be gathered during a weapons survey? \n Weapons surveys can support the design of multiple types of activities related to SALW control in various contexts, including those related to DDR. The information collected during this process can inform a wide range of initiatives, and it is therefore important to identify other UN stakeholders with whom to engage when designing the survey to avoid duplication of effort. \n\n Components \n Contextual analysis: conflict analysis; mapping of armed actors; political, economic, social, environmental, cultural factors. \n Weapons distribution assessment: types; quantities; possession by men, women and children; movements of SALW; illicit sources of weapons and ammunition; potential locations of materiel and caches. \n Impact survey: impact of weapons on children, women, men, vulnerable groups, DDR beneficiaries etc.; social and economic developments; number of acts of armed violence and victims. \n Perception survey: attitudes of various groups towards weapons; reasons for armed groups holding weapons; alternatives to weapons possession etc. \n Capacity assessment: community, local, national coping mechanism; legal tools; security and non-security responses.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -75835,7 +75835,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1341, - "Paragraph": "What information should be gathered during a weapons survey? \\n Weapons surveys can support the design of multiple types of activities related to SALW control in various contexts, including those related to DDR. The information collected during this process can inform a wide range of initiatives, and it is therefore important to identify other UN stakeholders with whom to engage when designing the survey to avoid duplication of effort. \\n\\n Components \\n Contextual analysis: conflict analysis; mapping of armed actors; political, economic, social, environmental, cultural factors. \\n Weapons distribution assessment: types; quantities; possession by men, women and children; movements of SALW; illicit sources of weapons and ammunition; potential locations of materiel and caches. \\n Impact survey: impact of weapons on children, women, men, vulnerable groups, DDR beneficiaries etc.; social and economic developments; number of acts of armed violence and victims. \\n Perception survey: attitudes of various groups towards weapons; reasons for armed groups holding weapons; alternatives to weapons possession etc. \\n Capacity assessment: community, local, national coping mechanism; legal tools; security and non-security responses.", + "Paragraph": "What information should be gathered during a weapons survey? \n Weapons surveys can support the design of multiple types of activities related to SALW control in various contexts, including those related to DDR. The information collected during this process can inform a wide range of initiatives, and it is therefore important to identify other UN stakeholders with whom to engage when designing the survey to avoid duplication of effort. \n\n Components \n Contextual analysis: conflict analysis; mapping of armed actors; political, economic, social, environmental, cultural factors. \n Weapons distribution assessment: types; quantities; possession by men, women and children; movements of SALW; illicit sources of weapons and ammunition; potential locations of materiel and caches. \n Impact survey: impact of weapons on children, women, men, vulnerable groups, DDR beneficiaries etc.; social and economic developments; number of acts of armed violence and victims. \n Perception survey: attitudes of various groups towards weapons; reasons for armed groups holding weapons; alternatives to weapons possession etc. \n Capacity assessment: community, local, national coping mechanism; legal tools; security and non-security responses.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -75846,14 +75846,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Perception survey: attitudes of various groups towards weapons; reasons for armed groups holding weapons; alternatives to weapons possession etc.", + "Sentence": "\n Perception survey: attitudes of various groups towards weapons; reasons for armed groups holding weapons; alternatives to weapons possession etc.", "newParagraph": "information gathered weapon survey n weapon survey support design multiple type activity related salw control various context including related ddr information collected process inform wide range initiative therefore important identify un stakeholder engage designing survey avoid duplication effort nn component n contextual analysis conflict analysis mapping armed actor political economic social environmental cultural factor n weapon distribution assessment type quantity possession men woman child movement salw illicit source weapon ammunition potential location materiel cache n impact survey impact weapon child woman men vulnerable group ddr beneficiary etc social economic development number act armed violence victim n perception survey attitude various group towards weapon reason armed group holding weapon alternative weapon possession etc n capacity assessment community local national coping mechanism legal tool security nonsecurity response", "ProcessedSent": "n perception survey attitude various group towards weapon reason armed group holding weapon alternative weapon possession etc", "SentID": 4213 }, { "ParagraphID": 1341, - "Paragraph": "What information should be gathered during a weapons survey? \\n Weapons surveys can support the design of multiple types of activities related to SALW control in various contexts, including those related to DDR. The information collected during this process can inform a wide range of initiatives, and it is therefore important to identify other UN stakeholders with whom to engage when designing the survey to avoid duplication of effort. \\n\\n Components \\n Contextual analysis: conflict analysis; mapping of armed actors; political, economic, social, environmental, cultural factors. \\n Weapons distribution assessment: types; quantities; possession by men, women and children; movements of SALW; illicit sources of weapons and ammunition; potential locations of materiel and caches. \\n Impact survey: impact of weapons on children, women, men, vulnerable groups, DDR beneficiaries etc.; social and economic developments; number of acts of armed violence and victims. \\n Perception survey: attitudes of various groups towards weapons; reasons for armed groups holding weapons; alternatives to weapons possession etc. \\n Capacity assessment: community, local, national coping mechanism; legal tools; security and non-security responses.", + "Paragraph": "What information should be gathered during a weapons survey? \n Weapons surveys can support the design of multiple types of activities related to SALW control in various contexts, including those related to DDR. The information collected during this process can inform a wide range of initiatives, and it is therefore important to identify other UN stakeholders with whom to engage when designing the survey to avoid duplication of effort. \n\n Components \n Contextual analysis: conflict analysis; mapping of armed actors; political, economic, social, environmental, cultural factors. \n Weapons distribution assessment: types; quantities; possession by men, women and children; movements of SALW; illicit sources of weapons and ammunition; potential locations of materiel and caches. \n Impact survey: impact of weapons on children, women, men, vulnerable groups, DDR beneficiaries etc.; social and economic developments; number of acts of armed violence and victims. \n Perception survey: attitudes of various groups towards weapons; reasons for armed groups holding weapons; alternatives to weapons possession etc. \n Capacity assessment: community, local, national coping mechanism; legal tools; security and non-security responses.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -75864,7 +75864,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Capacity assessment: community, local, national coping mechanism; legal tools; security and non-security responses.", + "Sentence": "\n Capacity assessment: community, local, national coping mechanism; legal tools; security and non-security responses.", "newParagraph": "information gathered weapon survey n weapon survey support design multiple type activity related salw control various context including related ddr information collected process inform wide range initiative therefore important identify un stakeholder engage designing survey avoid duplication effort nn component n contextual analysis conflict analysis mapping armed actor political economic social environmental cultural factor n weapon distribution assessment type quantity possession men woman child movement salw illicit source weapon ammunition potential location materiel cache n impact survey impact weapon child woman men vulnerable group ddr beneficiary etc social economic development number act armed violence victim n perception survey attitude various group towards weapon reason armed group holding weapon alternative weapon possession etc n capacity assessment community local national coping mechanism legal tool security nonsecurity response", "ProcessedSent": "n capacity assessment community local national coping mechanism legal tool security nonsecurity response", "SentID": 4214 @@ -75979,7 +75979,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1345, - "Paragraph": "Among others, the weapons survey will help identify the following: \\n Communities particularly affected by weapons availability and armed violence. \\n Communities particularly affected by violence related to ex-combatants. \\n Communities ready to participate in CVR and the types of programming they would like to see developed. \\n Types of weapons and ammunition in circulation and in demand. \\n Trafficking routes and modus operandi of weapons trafficking. \\n Groups holding weapons and the profiles of combatants. \\n Cultural and monetary values of weapons. \\n Security concerns and other negative impacts linked to potential interventions.", + "Paragraph": "Among others, the weapons survey will help identify the following: \n Communities particularly affected by weapons availability and armed violence. \n Communities particularly affected by violence related to ex-combatants. \n Communities ready to participate in CVR and the types of programming they would like to see developed. \n Types of weapons and ammunition in circulation and in demand. \n Trafficking routes and modus operandi of weapons trafficking. \n Groups holding weapons and the profiles of combatants. \n Cultural and monetary values of weapons. \n Security concerns and other negative impacts linked to potential interventions.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -75990,14 +75990,14 @@ "Heading2": "Methodology", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Among others, the weapons survey will help identify the following: \\n Communities particularly affected by weapons availability and armed violence.", + "Sentence": "Among others, the weapons survey will help identify the following: \n Communities particularly affected by weapons availability and armed violence.", "newParagraph": "among others weapon survey help identify following n community particularly affected weapon availability armed violence n community particularly affected violence related excombatants n community ready participate cvr type programming would like see developed n type weapon ammunition circulation demand n trafficking route modus operandi weapon trafficking n group holding weapon profile combatant n cultural monetary value weapon n security concern negative impact linked potential intervention", "ProcessedSent": "among others weapon survey help identify following n community particularly affected weapon availability armed violence", "SentID": 4221 }, { "ParagraphID": 1345, - "Paragraph": "Among others, the weapons survey will help identify the following: \\n Communities particularly affected by weapons availability and armed violence. \\n Communities particularly affected by violence related to ex-combatants. \\n Communities ready to participate in CVR and the types of programming they would like to see developed. \\n Types of weapons and ammunition in circulation and in demand. \\n Trafficking routes and modus operandi of weapons trafficking. \\n Groups holding weapons and the profiles of combatants. \\n Cultural and monetary values of weapons. \\n Security concerns and other negative impacts linked to potential interventions.", + "Paragraph": "Among others, the weapons survey will help identify the following: \n Communities particularly affected by weapons availability and armed violence. \n Communities particularly affected by violence related to ex-combatants. \n Communities ready to participate in CVR and the types of programming they would like to see developed. \n Types of weapons and ammunition in circulation and in demand. \n Trafficking routes and modus operandi of weapons trafficking. \n Groups holding weapons and the profiles of combatants. \n Cultural and monetary values of weapons. \n Security concerns and other negative impacts linked to potential interventions.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -76008,14 +76008,14 @@ "Heading2": "Methodology", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Communities particularly affected by violence related to ex-combatants.", + "Sentence": "\n Communities particularly affected by violence related to ex-combatants.", "newParagraph": "among others weapon survey help identify following n community particularly affected weapon availability armed violence n community particularly affected violence related excombatants n community ready participate cvr type programming would like see developed n type weapon ammunition circulation demand n trafficking route modus operandi weapon trafficking n group holding weapon profile combatant n cultural monetary value weapon n security concern negative impact linked potential intervention", "ProcessedSent": "n community particularly affected violence related excombatants", "SentID": 4222 }, { "ParagraphID": 1345, - "Paragraph": "Among others, the weapons survey will help identify the following: \\n Communities particularly affected by weapons availability and armed violence. \\n Communities particularly affected by violence related to ex-combatants. \\n Communities ready to participate in CVR and the types of programming they would like to see developed. \\n Types of weapons and ammunition in circulation and in demand. \\n Trafficking routes and modus operandi of weapons trafficking. \\n Groups holding weapons and the profiles of combatants. \\n Cultural and monetary values of weapons. \\n Security concerns and other negative impacts linked to potential interventions.", + "Paragraph": "Among others, the weapons survey will help identify the following: \n Communities particularly affected by weapons availability and armed violence. \n Communities particularly affected by violence related to ex-combatants. \n Communities ready to participate in CVR and the types of programming they would like to see developed. \n Types of weapons and ammunition in circulation and in demand. \n Trafficking routes and modus operandi of weapons trafficking. \n Groups holding weapons and the profiles of combatants. \n Cultural and monetary values of weapons. \n Security concerns and other negative impacts linked to potential interventions.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -76026,14 +76026,14 @@ "Heading2": "Methodology", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Communities ready to participate in CVR and the types of programming they would like to see developed.", + "Sentence": "\n Communities ready to participate in CVR and the types of programming they would like to see developed.", "newParagraph": "among others weapon survey help identify following n community particularly affected weapon availability armed violence n community particularly affected violence related excombatants n community ready participate cvr type programming would like see developed n type weapon ammunition circulation demand n trafficking route modus operandi weapon trafficking n group holding weapon profile combatant n cultural monetary value weapon n security concern negative impact linked potential intervention", "ProcessedSent": "n community ready participate cvr type programming would like see developed", "SentID": 4223 }, { "ParagraphID": 1345, - "Paragraph": "Among others, the weapons survey will help identify the following: \\n Communities particularly affected by weapons availability and armed violence. \\n Communities particularly affected by violence related to ex-combatants. \\n Communities ready to participate in CVR and the types of programming they would like to see developed. \\n Types of weapons and ammunition in circulation and in demand. \\n Trafficking routes and modus operandi of weapons trafficking. \\n Groups holding weapons and the profiles of combatants. \\n Cultural and monetary values of weapons. \\n Security concerns and other negative impacts linked to potential interventions.", + "Paragraph": "Among others, the weapons survey will help identify the following: \n Communities particularly affected by weapons availability and armed violence. \n Communities particularly affected by violence related to ex-combatants. \n Communities ready to participate in CVR and the types of programming they would like to see developed. \n Types of weapons and ammunition in circulation and in demand. \n Trafficking routes and modus operandi of weapons trafficking. \n Groups holding weapons and the profiles of combatants. \n Cultural and monetary values of weapons. \n Security concerns and other negative impacts linked to potential interventions.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -76044,14 +76044,14 @@ "Heading2": "Methodology", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Types of weapons and ammunition in circulation and in demand.", + "Sentence": "\n Types of weapons and ammunition in circulation and in demand.", "newParagraph": "among others weapon survey help identify following n community particularly affected weapon availability armed violence n community particularly affected violence related excombatants n community ready participate cvr type programming would like see developed n type weapon ammunition circulation demand n trafficking route modus operandi weapon trafficking n group holding weapon profile combatant n cultural monetary value weapon n security concern negative impact linked potential intervention", "ProcessedSent": "n type weapon ammunition circulation demand", "SentID": 4224 }, { "ParagraphID": 1345, - "Paragraph": "Among others, the weapons survey will help identify the following: \\n Communities particularly affected by weapons availability and armed violence. \\n Communities particularly affected by violence related to ex-combatants. \\n Communities ready to participate in CVR and the types of programming they would like to see developed. \\n Types of weapons and ammunition in circulation and in demand. \\n Trafficking routes and modus operandi of weapons trafficking. \\n Groups holding weapons and the profiles of combatants. \\n Cultural and monetary values of weapons. \\n Security concerns and other negative impacts linked to potential interventions.", + "Paragraph": "Among others, the weapons survey will help identify the following: \n Communities particularly affected by weapons availability and armed violence. \n Communities particularly affected by violence related to ex-combatants. \n Communities ready to participate in CVR and the types of programming they would like to see developed. \n Types of weapons and ammunition in circulation and in demand. \n Trafficking routes and modus operandi of weapons trafficking. \n Groups holding weapons and the profiles of combatants. \n Cultural and monetary values of weapons. \n Security concerns and other negative impacts linked to potential interventions.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -76062,14 +76062,14 @@ "Heading2": "Methodology", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Trafficking routes and modus operandi of weapons trafficking.", + "Sentence": "\n Trafficking routes and modus operandi of weapons trafficking.", "newParagraph": "among others weapon survey help identify following n community particularly affected weapon availability armed violence n community particularly affected violence related excombatants n community ready participate cvr type programming would like see developed n type weapon ammunition circulation demand n trafficking route modus operandi weapon trafficking n group holding weapon profile combatant n cultural monetary value weapon n security concern negative impact linked potential intervention", "ProcessedSent": "n trafficking route modus operandi weapon trafficking", "SentID": 4225 }, { "ParagraphID": 1345, - "Paragraph": "Among others, the weapons survey will help identify the following: \\n Communities particularly affected by weapons availability and armed violence. \\n Communities particularly affected by violence related to ex-combatants. \\n Communities ready to participate in CVR and the types of programming they would like to see developed. \\n Types of weapons and ammunition in circulation and in demand. \\n Trafficking routes and modus operandi of weapons trafficking. \\n Groups holding weapons and the profiles of combatants. \\n Cultural and monetary values of weapons. \\n Security concerns and other negative impacts linked to potential interventions.", + "Paragraph": "Among others, the weapons survey will help identify the following: \n Communities particularly affected by weapons availability and armed violence. \n Communities particularly affected by violence related to ex-combatants. \n Communities ready to participate in CVR and the types of programming they would like to see developed. \n Types of weapons and ammunition in circulation and in demand. \n Trafficking routes and modus operandi of weapons trafficking. \n Groups holding weapons and the profiles of combatants. \n Cultural and monetary values of weapons. \n Security concerns and other negative impacts linked to potential interventions.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -76080,14 +76080,14 @@ "Heading2": "Methodology", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Groups holding weapons and the profiles of combatants.", + "Sentence": "\n Groups holding weapons and the profiles of combatants.", "newParagraph": "among others weapon survey help identify following n community particularly affected weapon availability armed violence n community particularly affected violence related excombatants n community ready participate cvr type programming would like see developed n type weapon ammunition circulation demand n trafficking route modus operandi weapon trafficking n group holding weapon profile combatant n cultural monetary value weapon n security concern negative impact linked potential intervention", "ProcessedSent": "n group holding weapon profile combatant", "SentID": 4226 }, { "ParagraphID": 1345, - "Paragraph": "Among others, the weapons survey will help identify the following: \\n Communities particularly affected by weapons availability and armed violence. \\n Communities particularly affected by violence related to ex-combatants. \\n Communities ready to participate in CVR and the types of programming they would like to see developed. \\n Types of weapons and ammunition in circulation and in demand. \\n Trafficking routes and modus operandi of weapons trafficking. \\n Groups holding weapons and the profiles of combatants. \\n Cultural and monetary values of weapons. \\n Security concerns and other negative impacts linked to potential interventions.", + "Paragraph": "Among others, the weapons survey will help identify the following: \n Communities particularly affected by weapons availability and armed violence. \n Communities particularly affected by violence related to ex-combatants. \n Communities ready to participate in CVR and the types of programming they would like to see developed. \n Types of weapons and ammunition in circulation and in demand. \n Trafficking routes and modus operandi of weapons trafficking. \n Groups holding weapons and the profiles of combatants. \n Cultural and monetary values of weapons. \n Security concerns and other negative impacts linked to potential interventions.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -76098,14 +76098,14 @@ "Heading2": "Methodology", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Cultural and monetary values of weapons.", + "Sentence": "\n Cultural and monetary values of weapons.", "newParagraph": "among others weapon survey help identify following n community particularly affected weapon availability armed violence n community particularly affected violence related excombatants n community ready participate cvr type programming would like see developed n type weapon ammunition circulation demand n trafficking route modus operandi weapon trafficking n group holding weapon profile combatant n cultural monetary value weapon n security concern negative impact linked potential intervention", "ProcessedSent": "n cultural monetary value weapon", "SentID": 4227 }, { "ParagraphID": 1345, - "Paragraph": "Among others, the weapons survey will help identify the following: \\n Communities particularly affected by weapons availability and armed violence. \\n Communities particularly affected by violence related to ex-combatants. \\n Communities ready to participate in CVR and the types of programming they would like to see developed. \\n Types of weapons and ammunition in circulation and in demand. \\n Trafficking routes and modus operandi of weapons trafficking. \\n Groups holding weapons and the profiles of combatants. \\n Cultural and monetary values of weapons. \\n Security concerns and other negative impacts linked to potential interventions.", + "Paragraph": "Among others, the weapons survey will help identify the following: \n Communities particularly affected by weapons availability and armed violence. \n Communities particularly affected by violence related to ex-combatants. \n Communities ready to participate in CVR and the types of programming they would like to see developed. \n Types of weapons and ammunition in circulation and in demand. \n Trafficking routes and modus operandi of weapons trafficking. \n Groups holding weapons and the profiles of combatants. \n Cultural and monetary values of weapons. \n Security concerns and other negative impacts linked to potential interventions.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -76116,7 +76116,7 @@ "Heading2": "Methodology", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Security concerns and other negative impacts linked to potential interventions.", + "Sentence": "\n Security concerns and other negative impacts linked to potential interventions.", "newParagraph": "among others weapon survey help identify following n community particularly affected weapon availability armed violence n community particularly affected violence related excombatants n community ready participate cvr type programming would like see developed n type weapon ammunition circulation demand n trafficking route modus operandi weapon trafficking n group holding weapon profile combatant n cultural monetary value weapon n security concern negative impact linked potential intervention", "ProcessedSent": "n security concern negative impact linked potential intervention", "SentID": 4228 @@ -76159,7 +76159,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1347, - "Paragraph": "Selection criteria include: \\n Type of weapons; \\n Quantity of weapons; \\n Availability of funds (for equipment, training and staff); \\n Available level of WAM expertise; \\n Availability of local resources and technology; \\n Available infrastructure; \\n Security constraints; \\n Local customs and references.", + "Paragraph": "Selection criteria include: \n Type of weapons; \n Quantity of weapons; \n Availability of funds (for equipment, training and staff); \n Available level of WAM expertise; \n Availability of local resources and technology; \n Available infrastructure; \n Security constraints; \n Local customs and references.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -76170,7 +76170,7 @@ "Heading2": "Destruction of SALW", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Selection criteria include: \\n Type of weapons; \\n Quantity of weapons; \\n Availability of funds (for equipment, training and staff); \\n Available level of WAM expertise; \\n Availability of local resources and technology; \\n Available infrastructure; \\n Security constraints; \\n Local customs and references.", + "Sentence": "Selection criteria include: \n Type of weapons; \n Quantity of weapons; \n Availability of funds (for equipment, training and staff); \n Available level of WAM expertise; \n Availability of local resources and technology; \n Available infrastructure; \n Security constraints; \n Local customs and references.", "newParagraph": "selection criterion include n type weapon n quantity weapon n availability fund equipment training staff n available level wam expertise n availability local resource technology n available infrastructure n security constraint n local custom reference", "ProcessedSent": "selection criterion include n type weapon n quantity weapon n availability fund equipment training staff n available level wam expertise n availability local resource technology n available infrastructure n security constraint n local custom reference", "SentID": 4231 @@ -76249,7 +76249,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1350, - "Paragraph": "IATG 10.10 shall serve as the basis for all destruction of ammunition and explosives activities. The following IMAS also cover the stockpile destruction of ammunition and explosives: \\n IMAS 11.10: \u2018Stockpile Destruction\u2019; \\n IMAS 11.20: \u2018Open Burning and Open Detonation (OBOD) Operations\u2019; \\n IMAS 11.30: \u2018National Planning Guidelines\u2019.", + "Paragraph": "IATG 10.10 shall serve as the basis for all destruction of ammunition and explosives activities. The following IMAS also cover the stockpile destruction of ammunition and explosives: \n IMAS 11.10: \u2018Stockpile Destruction\u2019; \n IMAS 11.20: \u2018Open Burning and Open Detonation (OBOD) Operations\u2019; \n IMAS 11.30: \u2018National Planning Guidelines\u2019.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -76267,7 +76267,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1350, - "Paragraph": "IATG 10.10 shall serve as the basis for all destruction of ammunition and explosives activities. The following IMAS also cover the stockpile destruction of ammunition and explosives: \\n IMAS 11.10: \u2018Stockpile Destruction\u2019; \\n IMAS 11.20: \u2018Open Burning and Open Detonation (OBOD) Operations\u2019; \\n IMAS 11.30: \u2018National Planning Guidelines\u2019.", + "Paragraph": "IATG 10.10 shall serve as the basis for all destruction of ammunition and explosives activities. The following IMAS also cover the stockpile destruction of ammunition and explosives: \n IMAS 11.10: \u2018Stockpile Destruction\u2019; \n IMAS 11.20: \u2018Open Burning and Open Detonation (OBOD) Operations\u2019; \n IMAS 11.30: \u2018National Planning Guidelines\u2019.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -76278,14 +76278,14 @@ "Heading2": "Destruction of ammunition and explosives", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The following IMAS also cover the stockpile destruction of ammunition and explosives: \\n IMAS 11.10: \u2018Stockpile Destruction\u2019; \\n IMAS 11.20: \u2018Open Burning and Open Detonation (OBOD) Operations\u2019; \\n IMAS 11.30: \u2018National Planning Guidelines\u2019.", + "Sentence": "The following IMAS also cover the stockpile destruction of ammunition and explosives: \n IMAS 11.10: \u2018Stockpile Destruction\u2019; \n IMAS 11.20: \u2018Open Burning and Open Detonation (OBOD) Operations\u2019; \n IMAS 11.30: \u2018National Planning Guidelines\u2019.", "newParagraph": "iatg 1010 shall serve basis destruction ammunition explosive activity following imas also cover stockpile destruction ammunition explosive n imas 1110 stockpile destruction n imas 1120 open burning open detonation obod operation n imas 1130 national planning guideline ", "ProcessedSent": "following imas also cover stockpile destruction ammunition explosive n imas 1110 stockpile destruction n imas 1120 open burning open detonation obod operation n imas 1130 national planning guideline ", "SentID": 4237 }, { "ParagraphID": 1351, - "Paragraph": "The EOD expert will select the method according to: \\n Type and quantity of ammunition to be destroyed; \\n Availability of qualified human resources; \\n Location and type of destruction sites available; \\n Distance from storage and destruction sites and accessibility; \\n Financial resources available; \\n Requisite equipment and materials available; \\n Environmental impact.", + "Paragraph": "The EOD expert will select the method according to: \n Type and quantity of ammunition to be destroyed; \n Availability of qualified human resources; \n Location and type of destruction sites available; \n Distance from storage and destruction sites and accessibility; \n Financial resources available; \n Requisite equipment and materials available; \n Environmental impact.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -76296,14 +76296,14 @@ "Heading2": "Destruction of ammunition and explosives", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The EOD expert will select the method according to: \\n Type and quantity of ammunition to be destroyed; \\n Availability of qualified human resources; \\n Location and type of destruction sites available; \\n Distance from storage and destruction sites and accessibility; \\n Financial resources available; \\n Requisite equipment and materials available; \\n Environmental impact.", + "Sentence": "The EOD expert will select the method according to: \n Type and quantity of ammunition to be destroyed; \n Availability of qualified human resources; \n Location and type of destruction sites available; \n Distance from storage and destruction sites and accessibility; \n Financial resources available; \n Requisite equipment and materials available; \n Environmental impact.", "newParagraph": "eod expert select method according n type quantity ammunition destroyed n availability qualified human resource n location type destruction site available n distance storage destruction site accessibility n financial resource available n requisite equipment material available n environmental impact", "ProcessedSent": "eod expert select method according n type quantity ammunition destroyed n availability qualified human resource n location type destruction site available n distance storage destruction site accessibility n financial resource available n requisite equipment material available n environmental impact", "SentID": 4238 }, { "ParagraphID": 1352, - "Paragraph": "The most commonly used methods in DDR settings are open burning and open detonation. These are regarded as the easiest ways to destroy ammunition and often present the most cost- effective solution; they are also highly symbolic and can serve as effective mechanisms for building confidence in the DDR programme. \\n Open burning is generally used for the destruction of propellants and pyrotechnic compositions and has the potential to cause significant environmental harm. \\n Open detonation uses serviceable explosives as charges to destroy ammunition and requires a large cordon to ensure protection from the blast. This method is labour intensive and may not destroy all ammunition, requiring post-blast EOD clearance.", + "Paragraph": "The most commonly used methods in DDR settings are open burning and open detonation. These are regarded as the easiest ways to destroy ammunition and often present the most cost- effective solution; they are also highly symbolic and can serve as effective mechanisms for building confidence in the DDR programme. \n Open burning is generally used for the destruction of propellants and pyrotechnic compositions and has the potential to cause significant environmental harm. \n Open detonation uses serviceable explosives as charges to destroy ammunition and requires a large cordon to ensure protection from the blast. This method is labour intensive and may not destroy all ammunition, requiring post-blast EOD clearance.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -76321,7 +76321,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1352, - "Paragraph": "The most commonly used methods in DDR settings are open burning and open detonation. These are regarded as the easiest ways to destroy ammunition and often present the most cost- effective solution; they are also highly symbolic and can serve as effective mechanisms for building confidence in the DDR programme. \\n Open burning is generally used for the destruction of propellants and pyrotechnic compositions and has the potential to cause significant environmental harm. \\n Open detonation uses serviceable explosives as charges to destroy ammunition and requires a large cordon to ensure protection from the blast. This method is labour intensive and may not destroy all ammunition, requiring post-blast EOD clearance.", + "Paragraph": "The most commonly used methods in DDR settings are open burning and open detonation. These are regarded as the easiest ways to destroy ammunition and often present the most cost- effective solution; they are also highly symbolic and can serve as effective mechanisms for building confidence in the DDR programme. \n Open burning is generally used for the destruction of propellants and pyrotechnic compositions and has the potential to cause significant environmental harm. \n Open detonation uses serviceable explosives as charges to destroy ammunition and requires a large cordon to ensure protection from the blast. This method is labour intensive and may not destroy all ammunition, requiring post-blast EOD clearance.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -76339,7 +76339,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1352, - "Paragraph": "The most commonly used methods in DDR settings are open burning and open detonation. These are regarded as the easiest ways to destroy ammunition and often present the most cost- effective solution; they are also highly symbolic and can serve as effective mechanisms for building confidence in the DDR programme. \\n Open burning is generally used for the destruction of propellants and pyrotechnic compositions and has the potential to cause significant environmental harm. \\n Open detonation uses serviceable explosives as charges to destroy ammunition and requires a large cordon to ensure protection from the blast. This method is labour intensive and may not destroy all ammunition, requiring post-blast EOD clearance.", + "Paragraph": "The most commonly used methods in DDR settings are open burning and open detonation. These are regarded as the easiest ways to destroy ammunition and often present the most cost- effective solution; they are also highly symbolic and can serve as effective mechanisms for building confidence in the DDR programme. \n Open burning is generally used for the destruction of propellants and pyrotechnic compositions and has the potential to cause significant environmental harm. \n Open detonation uses serviceable explosives as charges to destroy ammunition and requires a large cordon to ensure protection from the blast. This method is labour intensive and may not destroy all ammunition, requiring post-blast EOD clearance.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -76350,14 +76350,14 @@ "Heading2": "Destruction of ammunition and explosives", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Open burning is generally used for the destruction of propellants and pyrotechnic compositions and has the potential to cause significant environmental harm.", + "Sentence": "\n Open burning is generally used for the destruction of propellants and pyrotechnic compositions and has the potential to cause significant environmental harm.", "newParagraph": "commonly used method ddr setting open burning open detonation regarded easiest way destroy ammunition often present cost effective solution also highly symbolic serve effective mechanism building confidence ddr programme n open burning generally used destruction propellant pyrotechnic composition potential cause significant environmental harm n open detonation us serviceable explosive charge destroy ammunition requires large cordon ensure protection blast method labour intensive may destroy ammunition requiring postblast eod clearance", "ProcessedSent": "n open burning generally used destruction propellant pyrotechnic composition potential cause significant environmental harm", "SentID": 4241 }, { "ParagraphID": 1352, - "Paragraph": "The most commonly used methods in DDR settings are open burning and open detonation. These are regarded as the easiest ways to destroy ammunition and often present the most cost- effective solution; they are also highly symbolic and can serve as effective mechanisms for building confidence in the DDR programme. \\n Open burning is generally used for the destruction of propellants and pyrotechnic compositions and has the potential to cause significant environmental harm. \\n Open detonation uses serviceable explosives as charges to destroy ammunition and requires a large cordon to ensure protection from the blast. This method is labour intensive and may not destroy all ammunition, requiring post-blast EOD clearance.", + "Paragraph": "The most commonly used methods in DDR settings are open burning and open detonation. These are regarded as the easiest ways to destroy ammunition and often present the most cost- effective solution; they are also highly symbolic and can serve as effective mechanisms for building confidence in the DDR programme. \n Open burning is generally used for the destruction of propellants and pyrotechnic compositions and has the potential to cause significant environmental harm. \n Open detonation uses serviceable explosives as charges to destroy ammunition and requires a large cordon to ensure protection from the blast. This method is labour intensive and may not destroy all ammunition, requiring post-blast EOD clearance.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -76368,14 +76368,14 @@ "Heading2": "Destruction of ammunition and explosives", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Open detonation uses serviceable explosives as charges to destroy ammunition and requires a large cordon to ensure protection from the blast.", + "Sentence": "\n Open detonation uses serviceable explosives as charges to destroy ammunition and requires a large cordon to ensure protection from the blast.", "newParagraph": "commonly used method ddr setting open burning open detonation regarded easiest way destroy ammunition often present cost effective solution also highly symbolic serve effective mechanism building confidence ddr programme n open burning generally used destruction propellant pyrotechnic composition potential cause significant environmental harm n open detonation us serviceable explosive charge destroy ammunition requires large cordon ensure protection blast method labour intensive may destroy ammunition requiring postblast eod clearance", "ProcessedSent": "n open detonation us serviceable explosive charge destroy ammunition requires large cordon ensure protection blast", "SentID": 4242 }, { "ParagraphID": 1352, - "Paragraph": "The most commonly used methods in DDR settings are open burning and open detonation. These are regarded as the easiest ways to destroy ammunition and often present the most cost- effective solution; they are also highly symbolic and can serve as effective mechanisms for building confidence in the DDR programme. \\n Open burning is generally used for the destruction of propellants and pyrotechnic compositions and has the potential to cause significant environmental harm. \\n Open detonation uses serviceable explosives as charges to destroy ammunition and requires a large cordon to ensure protection from the blast. This method is labour intensive and may not destroy all ammunition, requiring post-blast EOD clearance.", + "Paragraph": "The most commonly used methods in DDR settings are open burning and open detonation. These are regarded as the easiest ways to destroy ammunition and often present the most cost- effective solution; they are also highly symbolic and can serve as effective mechanisms for building confidence in the DDR programme. \n Open burning is generally used for the destruction of propellants and pyrotechnic compositions and has the potential to cause significant environmental harm. \n Open detonation uses serviceable explosives as charges to destroy ammunition and requires a large cordon to ensure protection from the blast. This method is labour intensive and may not destroy all ammunition, requiring post-blast EOD clearance.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -76429,7 +76429,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1354, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \\n 2 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/ammunition \\n 3 The seven categories of major conventional arms, as defined by the UN Register of Conventional Arms, can be found at: https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/transparency-in -armaments\/ \\n 4 See Operative Paragraph 6 of UN Security Council resolution 2370 (2017) and Operative Paragraph 10 of UN Security Council resolution 2482 (2019); and Section VI. Preventing and combating the illicit trafficking of small arms and light weapons and Guiding Principle 52 of Security Council\u2019s 2018 Addendum to the Madrid Guiding Principles (S\/2018\/1177). \\n 5 See DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11. \\n 6 See ibid., Annex 6. \\n 7 Aside from those containing high explosive (HE) material. \\n 8 See Seesac. Defence Conversion \u2013 The Disposal and Demilitarization of Heavy Weapons Systems. 2006. \\n 9 See OSCE. 2018. Best Practice Guide: Minimum Standards for National Procedures for the Deactivation of SALW.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \n 2 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/ammunition \n 3 The seven categories of major conventional arms, as defined by the UN Register of Conventional Arms, can be found at: https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/transparency-in -armaments\/ \n 4 See Operative Paragraph 6 of UN Security Council resolution 2370 (2017) and Operative Paragraph 10 of UN Security Council resolution 2482 (2019); and Section VI. Preventing and combating the illicit trafficking of small arms and light weapons and Guiding Principle 52 of Security Council\u2019s 2018 Addendum to the Madrid Guiding Principles (S\/2018\/1177). \n 5 See DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11. \n 6 See ibid., Annex 6. \n 7 Aside from those containing high explosive (HE) material. \n 8 See Seesac. Defence Conversion \u2013 The Disposal and Demilitarization of Heavy Weapons Systems. 2006. \n 9 See OSCE. 2018. Best Practice Guide: Minimum Standards for National Procedures for the Deactivation of SALW.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -76440,14 +76440,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 1 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic.", + "Sentence": "\n 1 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic.", "newParagraph": "n 1 httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmsmosaic n 2 httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmsammunition n 3 seven category major conventional arm defined un register conventional arm found httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmstransparencyin armament n 4 see operative paragraph 6 un security council resolution 2370 2017 operative paragraph 10 un security council resolution 2482 2019 section vi preventing combating illicit trafficking small arm light weapon guiding principle 52 security council 2018 addendum madrid guiding principle s20181177 n 5 see ddr wam handbook unit 11 n 6 see ibid annex 6 n 7 aside containing high explosive material n 8 see seesac defence conversion disposal demilitarization heavy weapon system 2006 n 9 see osce 2018 best practice guide minimum standard national procedure deactivation salw", "ProcessedSent": "n 1 httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmsmosaic", "SentID": 4246 }, { "ParagraphID": 1354, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \\n 2 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/ammunition \\n 3 The seven categories of major conventional arms, as defined by the UN Register of Conventional Arms, can be found at: https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/transparency-in -armaments\/ \\n 4 See Operative Paragraph 6 of UN Security Council resolution 2370 (2017) and Operative Paragraph 10 of UN Security Council resolution 2482 (2019); and Section VI. Preventing and combating the illicit trafficking of small arms and light weapons and Guiding Principle 52 of Security Council\u2019s 2018 Addendum to the Madrid Guiding Principles (S\/2018\/1177). \\n 5 See DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11. \\n 6 See ibid., Annex 6. \\n 7 Aside from those containing high explosive (HE) material. \\n 8 See Seesac. Defence Conversion \u2013 The Disposal and Demilitarization of Heavy Weapons Systems. 2006. \\n 9 See OSCE. 2018. Best Practice Guide: Minimum Standards for National Procedures for the Deactivation of SALW.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \n 2 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/ammunition \n 3 The seven categories of major conventional arms, as defined by the UN Register of Conventional Arms, can be found at: https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/transparency-in -armaments\/ \n 4 See Operative Paragraph 6 of UN Security Council resolution 2370 (2017) and Operative Paragraph 10 of UN Security Council resolution 2482 (2019); and Section VI. Preventing and combating the illicit trafficking of small arms and light weapons and Guiding Principle 52 of Security Council\u2019s 2018 Addendum to the Madrid Guiding Principles (S\/2018\/1177). \n 5 See DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11. \n 6 See ibid., Annex 6. \n 7 Aside from those containing high explosive (HE) material. \n 8 See Seesac. Defence Conversion \u2013 The Disposal and Demilitarization of Heavy Weapons Systems. 2006. \n 9 See OSCE. 2018. Best Practice Guide: Minimum Standards for National Procedures for the Deactivation of SALW.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -76458,14 +76458,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 2 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/ammunition \\n 3 The seven categories of major conventional arms, as defined by the UN Register of Conventional Arms, can be found at: https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/transparency-in -armaments\/ \\n 4 See Operative Paragraph 6 of UN Security Council resolution 2370 (2017) and Operative Paragraph 10 of UN Security Council resolution 2482 (2019); and Section VI.", + "Sentence": "\n 2 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/ammunition \n 3 The seven categories of major conventional arms, as defined by the UN Register of Conventional Arms, can be found at: https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/transparency-in -armaments\/ \n 4 See Operative Paragraph 6 of UN Security Council resolution 2370 (2017) and Operative Paragraph 10 of UN Security Council resolution 2482 (2019); and Section VI.", "newParagraph": "n 1 httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmsmosaic n 2 httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmsammunition n 3 seven category major conventional arm defined un register conventional arm found httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmstransparencyin armament n 4 see operative paragraph 6 un security council resolution 2370 2017 operative paragraph 10 un security council resolution 2482 2019 section vi preventing combating illicit trafficking small arm light weapon guiding principle 52 security council 2018 addendum madrid guiding principle s20181177 n 5 see ddr wam handbook unit 11 n 6 see ibid annex 6 n 7 aside containing high explosive material n 8 see seesac defence conversion disposal demilitarization heavy weapon system 2006 n 9 see osce 2018 best practice guide minimum standard national procedure deactivation salw", "ProcessedSent": "n 2 httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmsammunition n 3 seven category major conventional arm defined un register conventional arm found httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmstransparencyin armament n 4 see operative paragraph 6 un security council resolution 2370 2017 operative paragraph 10 un security council resolution 2482 2019 section vi", "SentID": 4247 }, { "ParagraphID": 1354, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \\n 2 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/ammunition \\n 3 The seven categories of major conventional arms, as defined by the UN Register of Conventional Arms, can be found at: https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/transparency-in -armaments\/ \\n 4 See Operative Paragraph 6 of UN Security Council resolution 2370 (2017) and Operative Paragraph 10 of UN Security Council resolution 2482 (2019); and Section VI. Preventing and combating the illicit trafficking of small arms and light weapons and Guiding Principle 52 of Security Council\u2019s 2018 Addendum to the Madrid Guiding Principles (S\/2018\/1177). \\n 5 See DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11. \\n 6 See ibid., Annex 6. \\n 7 Aside from those containing high explosive (HE) material. \\n 8 See Seesac. Defence Conversion \u2013 The Disposal and Demilitarization of Heavy Weapons Systems. 2006. \\n 9 See OSCE. 2018. Best Practice Guide: Minimum Standards for National Procedures for the Deactivation of SALW.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \n 2 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/ammunition \n 3 The seven categories of major conventional arms, as defined by the UN Register of Conventional Arms, can be found at: https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/transparency-in -armaments\/ \n 4 See Operative Paragraph 6 of UN Security Council resolution 2370 (2017) and Operative Paragraph 10 of UN Security Council resolution 2482 (2019); and Section VI. Preventing and combating the illicit trafficking of small arms and light weapons and Guiding Principle 52 of Security Council\u2019s 2018 Addendum to the Madrid Guiding Principles (S\/2018\/1177). \n 5 See DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11. \n 6 See ibid., Annex 6. \n 7 Aside from those containing high explosive (HE) material. \n 8 See Seesac. Defence Conversion \u2013 The Disposal and Demilitarization of Heavy Weapons Systems. 2006. \n 9 See OSCE. 2018. Best Practice Guide: Minimum Standards for National Procedures for the Deactivation of SALW.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -76483,7 +76483,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1354, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \\n 2 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/ammunition \\n 3 The seven categories of major conventional arms, as defined by the UN Register of Conventional Arms, can be found at: https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/transparency-in -armaments\/ \\n 4 See Operative Paragraph 6 of UN Security Council resolution 2370 (2017) and Operative Paragraph 10 of UN Security Council resolution 2482 (2019); and Section VI. Preventing and combating the illicit trafficking of small arms and light weapons and Guiding Principle 52 of Security Council\u2019s 2018 Addendum to the Madrid Guiding Principles (S\/2018\/1177). \\n 5 See DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11. \\n 6 See ibid., Annex 6. \\n 7 Aside from those containing high explosive (HE) material. \\n 8 See Seesac. Defence Conversion \u2013 The Disposal and Demilitarization of Heavy Weapons Systems. 2006. \\n 9 See OSCE. 2018. Best Practice Guide: Minimum Standards for National Procedures for the Deactivation of SALW.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \n 2 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/ammunition \n 3 The seven categories of major conventional arms, as defined by the UN Register of Conventional Arms, can be found at: https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/transparency-in -armaments\/ \n 4 See Operative Paragraph 6 of UN Security Council resolution 2370 (2017) and Operative Paragraph 10 of UN Security Council resolution 2482 (2019); and Section VI. Preventing and combating the illicit trafficking of small arms and light weapons and Guiding Principle 52 of Security Council\u2019s 2018 Addendum to the Madrid Guiding Principles (S\/2018\/1177). \n 5 See DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11. \n 6 See ibid., Annex 6. \n 7 Aside from those containing high explosive (HE) material. \n 8 See Seesac. Defence Conversion \u2013 The Disposal and Demilitarization of Heavy Weapons Systems. 2006. \n 9 See OSCE. 2018. Best Practice Guide: Minimum Standards for National Procedures for the Deactivation of SALW.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -76494,14 +76494,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 5 See DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11.", + "Sentence": "\n 5 See DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11.", "newParagraph": "n 1 httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmsmosaic n 2 httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmsammunition n 3 seven category major conventional arm defined un register conventional arm found httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmstransparencyin armament n 4 see operative paragraph 6 un security council resolution 2370 2017 operative paragraph 10 un security council resolution 2482 2019 section vi preventing combating illicit trafficking small arm light weapon guiding principle 52 security council 2018 addendum madrid guiding principle s20181177 n 5 see ddr wam handbook unit 11 n 6 see ibid annex 6 n 7 aside containing high explosive material n 8 see seesac defence conversion disposal demilitarization heavy weapon system 2006 n 9 see osce 2018 best practice guide minimum standard national procedure deactivation salw", "ProcessedSent": "n 5 see ddr wam handbook unit 11", "SentID": 4249 }, { "ParagraphID": 1354, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \\n 2 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/ammunition \\n 3 The seven categories of major conventional arms, as defined by the UN Register of Conventional Arms, can be found at: https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/transparency-in -armaments\/ \\n 4 See Operative Paragraph 6 of UN Security Council resolution 2370 (2017) and Operative Paragraph 10 of UN Security Council resolution 2482 (2019); and Section VI. Preventing and combating the illicit trafficking of small arms and light weapons and Guiding Principle 52 of Security Council\u2019s 2018 Addendum to the Madrid Guiding Principles (S\/2018\/1177). \\n 5 See DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11. \\n 6 See ibid., Annex 6. \\n 7 Aside from those containing high explosive (HE) material. \\n 8 See Seesac. Defence Conversion \u2013 The Disposal and Demilitarization of Heavy Weapons Systems. 2006. \\n 9 See OSCE. 2018. Best Practice Guide: Minimum Standards for National Procedures for the Deactivation of SALW.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \n 2 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/ammunition \n 3 The seven categories of major conventional arms, as defined by the UN Register of Conventional Arms, can be found at: https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/transparency-in -armaments\/ \n 4 See Operative Paragraph 6 of UN Security Council resolution 2370 (2017) and Operative Paragraph 10 of UN Security Council resolution 2482 (2019); and Section VI. Preventing and combating the illicit trafficking of small arms and light weapons and Guiding Principle 52 of Security Council\u2019s 2018 Addendum to the Madrid Guiding Principles (S\/2018\/1177). \n 5 See DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11. \n 6 See ibid., Annex 6. \n 7 Aside from those containing high explosive (HE) material. \n 8 See Seesac. Defence Conversion \u2013 The Disposal and Demilitarization of Heavy Weapons Systems. 2006. \n 9 See OSCE. 2018. Best Practice Guide: Minimum Standards for National Procedures for the Deactivation of SALW.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -76512,14 +76512,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 6 See ibid., Annex 6.", + "Sentence": "\n 6 See ibid., Annex 6.", "newParagraph": "n 1 httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmsmosaic n 2 httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmsammunition n 3 seven category major conventional arm defined un register conventional arm found httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmstransparencyin armament n 4 see operative paragraph 6 un security council resolution 2370 2017 operative paragraph 10 un security council resolution 2482 2019 section vi preventing combating illicit trafficking small arm light weapon guiding principle 52 security council 2018 addendum madrid guiding principle s20181177 n 5 see ddr wam handbook unit 11 n 6 see ibid annex 6 n 7 aside containing high explosive material n 8 see seesac defence conversion disposal demilitarization heavy weapon system 2006 n 9 see osce 2018 best practice guide minimum standard national procedure deactivation salw", "ProcessedSent": "n 6 see ibid annex 6", "SentID": 4250 }, { "ParagraphID": 1354, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \\n 2 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/ammunition \\n 3 The seven categories of major conventional arms, as defined by the UN Register of Conventional Arms, can be found at: https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/transparency-in -armaments\/ \\n 4 See Operative Paragraph 6 of UN Security Council resolution 2370 (2017) and Operative Paragraph 10 of UN Security Council resolution 2482 (2019); and Section VI. Preventing and combating the illicit trafficking of small arms and light weapons and Guiding Principle 52 of Security Council\u2019s 2018 Addendum to the Madrid Guiding Principles (S\/2018\/1177). \\n 5 See DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11. \\n 6 See ibid., Annex 6. \\n 7 Aside from those containing high explosive (HE) material. \\n 8 See Seesac. Defence Conversion \u2013 The Disposal and Demilitarization of Heavy Weapons Systems. 2006. \\n 9 See OSCE. 2018. Best Practice Guide: Minimum Standards for National Procedures for the Deactivation of SALW.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \n 2 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/ammunition \n 3 The seven categories of major conventional arms, as defined by the UN Register of Conventional Arms, can be found at: https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/transparency-in -armaments\/ \n 4 See Operative Paragraph 6 of UN Security Council resolution 2370 (2017) and Operative Paragraph 10 of UN Security Council resolution 2482 (2019); and Section VI. Preventing and combating the illicit trafficking of small arms and light weapons and Guiding Principle 52 of Security Council\u2019s 2018 Addendum to the Madrid Guiding Principles (S\/2018\/1177). \n 5 See DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11. \n 6 See ibid., Annex 6. \n 7 Aside from those containing high explosive (HE) material. \n 8 See Seesac. Defence Conversion \u2013 The Disposal and Demilitarization of Heavy Weapons Systems. 2006. \n 9 See OSCE. 2018. Best Practice Guide: Minimum Standards for National Procedures for the Deactivation of SALW.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -76530,14 +76530,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 7 Aside from those containing high explosive (HE) material.", + "Sentence": "\n 7 Aside from those containing high explosive (HE) material.", "newParagraph": "n 1 httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmsmosaic n 2 httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmsammunition n 3 seven category major conventional arm defined un register conventional arm found httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmstransparencyin armament n 4 see operative paragraph 6 un security council resolution 2370 2017 operative paragraph 10 un security council resolution 2482 2019 section vi preventing combating illicit trafficking small arm light weapon guiding principle 52 security council 2018 addendum madrid guiding principle s20181177 n 5 see ddr wam handbook unit 11 n 6 see ibid annex 6 n 7 aside containing high explosive material n 8 see seesac defence conversion disposal demilitarization heavy weapon system 2006 n 9 see osce 2018 best practice guide minimum standard national procedure deactivation salw", "ProcessedSent": "n 7 aside containing high explosive material", "SentID": 4251 }, { "ParagraphID": 1354, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \\n 2 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/ammunition \\n 3 The seven categories of major conventional arms, as defined by the UN Register of Conventional Arms, can be found at: https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/transparency-in -armaments\/ \\n 4 See Operative Paragraph 6 of UN Security Council resolution 2370 (2017) and Operative Paragraph 10 of UN Security Council resolution 2482 (2019); and Section VI. Preventing and combating the illicit trafficking of small arms and light weapons and Guiding Principle 52 of Security Council\u2019s 2018 Addendum to the Madrid Guiding Principles (S\/2018\/1177). \\n 5 See DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11. \\n 6 See ibid., Annex 6. \\n 7 Aside from those containing high explosive (HE) material. \\n 8 See Seesac. Defence Conversion \u2013 The Disposal and Demilitarization of Heavy Weapons Systems. 2006. \\n 9 See OSCE. 2018. Best Practice Guide: Minimum Standards for National Procedures for the Deactivation of SALW.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \n 2 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/ammunition \n 3 The seven categories of major conventional arms, as defined by the UN Register of Conventional Arms, can be found at: https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/transparency-in -armaments\/ \n 4 See Operative Paragraph 6 of UN Security Council resolution 2370 (2017) and Operative Paragraph 10 of UN Security Council resolution 2482 (2019); and Section VI. Preventing and combating the illicit trafficking of small arms and light weapons and Guiding Principle 52 of Security Council\u2019s 2018 Addendum to the Madrid Guiding Principles (S\/2018\/1177). \n 5 See DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11. \n 6 See ibid., Annex 6. \n 7 Aside from those containing high explosive (HE) material. \n 8 See Seesac. Defence Conversion \u2013 The Disposal and Demilitarization of Heavy Weapons Systems. 2006. \n 9 See OSCE. 2018. Best Practice Guide: Minimum Standards for National Procedures for the Deactivation of SALW.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -76548,14 +76548,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 8 See Seesac.", + "Sentence": "\n 8 See Seesac.", "newParagraph": "n 1 httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmsmosaic n 2 httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmsammunition n 3 seven category major conventional arm defined un register conventional arm found httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmstransparencyin armament n 4 see operative paragraph 6 un security council resolution 2370 2017 operative paragraph 10 un security council resolution 2482 2019 section vi preventing combating illicit trafficking small arm light weapon guiding principle 52 security council 2018 addendum madrid guiding principle s20181177 n 5 see ddr wam handbook unit 11 n 6 see ibid annex 6 n 7 aside containing high explosive material n 8 see seesac defence conversion disposal demilitarization heavy weapon system 2006 n 9 see osce 2018 best practice guide minimum standard national procedure deactivation salw", "ProcessedSent": "n 8 see seesac", "SentID": 4252 }, { "ParagraphID": 1354, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \\n 2 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/ammunition \\n 3 The seven categories of major conventional arms, as defined by the UN Register of Conventional Arms, can be found at: https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/transparency-in -armaments\/ \\n 4 See Operative Paragraph 6 of UN Security Council resolution 2370 (2017) and Operative Paragraph 10 of UN Security Council resolution 2482 (2019); and Section VI. Preventing and combating the illicit trafficking of small arms and light weapons and Guiding Principle 52 of Security Council\u2019s 2018 Addendum to the Madrid Guiding Principles (S\/2018\/1177). \\n 5 See DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11. \\n 6 See ibid., Annex 6. \\n 7 Aside from those containing high explosive (HE) material. \\n 8 See Seesac. Defence Conversion \u2013 The Disposal and Demilitarization of Heavy Weapons Systems. 2006. \\n 9 See OSCE. 2018. Best Practice Guide: Minimum Standards for National Procedures for the Deactivation of SALW.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \n 2 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/ammunition \n 3 The seven categories of major conventional arms, as defined by the UN Register of Conventional Arms, can be found at: https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/transparency-in -armaments\/ \n 4 See Operative Paragraph 6 of UN Security Council resolution 2370 (2017) and Operative Paragraph 10 of UN Security Council resolution 2482 (2019); and Section VI. Preventing and combating the illicit trafficking of small arms and light weapons and Guiding Principle 52 of Security Council\u2019s 2018 Addendum to the Madrid Guiding Principles (S\/2018\/1177). \n 5 See DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11. \n 6 See ibid., Annex 6. \n 7 Aside from those containing high explosive (HE) material. \n 8 See Seesac. Defence Conversion \u2013 The Disposal and Demilitarization of Heavy Weapons Systems. 2006. \n 9 See OSCE. 2018. Best Practice Guide: Minimum Standards for National Procedures for the Deactivation of SALW.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -76573,7 +76573,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1354, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \\n 2 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/ammunition \\n 3 The seven categories of major conventional arms, as defined by the UN Register of Conventional Arms, can be found at: https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/transparency-in -armaments\/ \\n 4 See Operative Paragraph 6 of UN Security Council resolution 2370 (2017) and Operative Paragraph 10 of UN Security Council resolution 2482 (2019); and Section VI. Preventing and combating the illicit trafficking of small arms and light weapons and Guiding Principle 52 of Security Council\u2019s 2018 Addendum to the Madrid Guiding Principles (S\/2018\/1177). \\n 5 See DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11. \\n 6 See ibid., Annex 6. \\n 7 Aside from those containing high explosive (HE) material. \\n 8 See Seesac. Defence Conversion \u2013 The Disposal and Demilitarization of Heavy Weapons Systems. 2006. \\n 9 See OSCE. 2018. Best Practice Guide: Minimum Standards for National Procedures for the Deactivation of SALW.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \n 2 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/ammunition \n 3 The seven categories of major conventional arms, as defined by the UN Register of Conventional Arms, can be found at: https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/transparency-in -armaments\/ \n 4 See Operative Paragraph 6 of UN Security Council resolution 2370 (2017) and Operative Paragraph 10 of UN Security Council resolution 2482 (2019); and Section VI. Preventing and combating the illicit trafficking of small arms and light weapons and Guiding Principle 52 of Security Council\u2019s 2018 Addendum to the Madrid Guiding Principles (S\/2018\/1177). \n 5 See DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11. \n 6 See ibid., Annex 6. \n 7 Aside from those containing high explosive (HE) material. \n 8 See Seesac. Defence Conversion \u2013 The Disposal and Demilitarization of Heavy Weapons Systems. 2006. \n 9 See OSCE. 2018. Best Practice Guide: Minimum Standards for National Procedures for the Deactivation of SALW.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -76591,7 +76591,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1354, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \\n 2 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/ammunition \\n 3 The seven categories of major conventional arms, as defined by the UN Register of Conventional Arms, can be found at: https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/transparency-in -armaments\/ \\n 4 See Operative Paragraph 6 of UN Security Council resolution 2370 (2017) and Operative Paragraph 10 of UN Security Council resolution 2482 (2019); and Section VI. Preventing and combating the illicit trafficking of small arms and light weapons and Guiding Principle 52 of Security Council\u2019s 2018 Addendum to the Madrid Guiding Principles (S\/2018\/1177). \\n 5 See DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11. \\n 6 See ibid., Annex 6. \\n 7 Aside from those containing high explosive (HE) material. \\n 8 See Seesac. Defence Conversion \u2013 The Disposal and Demilitarization of Heavy Weapons Systems. 2006. \\n 9 See OSCE. 2018. Best Practice Guide: Minimum Standards for National Procedures for the Deactivation of SALW.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \n 2 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/ammunition \n 3 The seven categories of major conventional arms, as defined by the UN Register of Conventional Arms, can be found at: https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/transparency-in -armaments\/ \n 4 See Operative Paragraph 6 of UN Security Council resolution 2370 (2017) and Operative Paragraph 10 of UN Security Council resolution 2482 (2019); and Section VI. Preventing and combating the illicit trafficking of small arms and light weapons and Guiding Principle 52 of Security Council\u2019s 2018 Addendum to the Madrid Guiding Principles (S\/2018\/1177). \n 5 See DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11. \n 6 See ibid., Annex 6. \n 7 Aside from those containing high explosive (HE) material. \n 8 See Seesac. Defence Conversion \u2013 The Disposal and Demilitarization of Heavy Weapons Systems. 2006. \n 9 See OSCE. 2018. Best Practice Guide: Minimum Standards for National Procedures for the Deactivation of SALW.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -76602,14 +76602,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 9 See OSCE.", + "Sentence": "\n 9 See OSCE.", "newParagraph": "n 1 httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmsmosaic n 2 httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmsammunition n 3 seven category major conventional arm defined un register conventional arm found httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmstransparencyin armament n 4 see operative paragraph 6 un security council resolution 2370 2017 operative paragraph 10 un security council resolution 2482 2019 section vi preventing combating illicit trafficking small arm light weapon guiding principle 52 security council 2018 addendum madrid guiding principle s20181177 n 5 see ddr wam handbook unit 11 n 6 see ibid annex 6 n 7 aside containing high explosive material n 8 see seesac defence conversion disposal demilitarization heavy weapon system 2006 n 9 see osce 2018 best practice guide minimum standard national procedure deactivation salw", "ProcessedSent": "n 9 see osce", "SentID": 4255 }, { "ParagraphID": 1354, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \\n 2 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/ammunition \\n 3 The seven categories of major conventional arms, as defined by the UN Register of Conventional Arms, can be found at: https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/transparency-in -armaments\/ \\n 4 See Operative Paragraph 6 of UN Security Council resolution 2370 (2017) and Operative Paragraph 10 of UN Security Council resolution 2482 (2019); and Section VI. Preventing and combating the illicit trafficking of small arms and light weapons and Guiding Principle 52 of Security Council\u2019s 2018 Addendum to the Madrid Guiding Principles (S\/2018\/1177). \\n 5 See DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11. \\n 6 See ibid., Annex 6. \\n 7 Aside from those containing high explosive (HE) material. \\n 8 See Seesac. Defence Conversion \u2013 The Disposal and Demilitarization of Heavy Weapons Systems. 2006. \\n 9 See OSCE. 2018. Best Practice Guide: Minimum Standards for National Procedures for the Deactivation of SALW.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \n 2 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/ammunition \n 3 The seven categories of major conventional arms, as defined by the UN Register of Conventional Arms, can be found at: https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/transparency-in -armaments\/ \n 4 See Operative Paragraph 6 of UN Security Council resolution 2370 (2017) and Operative Paragraph 10 of UN Security Council resolution 2482 (2019); and Section VI. Preventing and combating the illicit trafficking of small arms and light weapons and Guiding Principle 52 of Security Council\u2019s 2018 Addendum to the Madrid Guiding Principles (S\/2018\/1177). \n 5 See DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11. \n 6 See ibid., Annex 6. \n 7 Aside from those containing high explosive (HE) material. \n 8 See Seesac. Defence Conversion \u2013 The Disposal and Demilitarization of Heavy Weapons Systems. 2006. \n 9 See OSCE. 2018. Best Practice Guide: Minimum Standards for National Procedures for the Deactivation of SALW.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -76627,7 +76627,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1354, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \\n 2 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/ammunition \\n 3 The seven categories of major conventional arms, as defined by the UN Register of Conventional Arms, can be found at: https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/transparency-in -armaments\/ \\n 4 See Operative Paragraph 6 of UN Security Council resolution 2370 (2017) and Operative Paragraph 10 of UN Security Council resolution 2482 (2019); and Section VI. Preventing and combating the illicit trafficking of small arms and light weapons and Guiding Principle 52 of Security Council\u2019s 2018 Addendum to the Madrid Guiding Principles (S\/2018\/1177). \\n 5 See DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11. \\n 6 See ibid., Annex 6. \\n 7 Aside from those containing high explosive (HE) material. \\n 8 See Seesac. Defence Conversion \u2013 The Disposal and Demilitarization of Heavy Weapons Systems. 2006. \\n 9 See OSCE. 2018. Best Practice Guide: Minimum Standards for National Procedures for the Deactivation of SALW.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \n 2 https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/ammunition \n 3 The seven categories of major conventional arms, as defined by the UN Register of Conventional Arms, can be found at: https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/transparency-in -armaments\/ \n 4 See Operative Paragraph 6 of UN Security Council resolution 2370 (2017) and Operative Paragraph 10 of UN Security Council resolution 2482 (2019); and Section VI. Preventing and combating the illicit trafficking of small arms and light weapons and Guiding Principle 52 of Security Council\u2019s 2018 Addendum to the Madrid Guiding Principles (S\/2018\/1177). \n 5 See DDR WAM Handbook Unit 11. \n 6 See ibid., Annex 6. \n 7 Aside from those containing high explosive (HE) material. \n 8 See Seesac. Defence Conversion \u2013 The Disposal and Demilitarization of Heavy Weapons Systems. 2006. \n 9 See OSCE. 2018. Best Practice Guide: Minimum Standards for National Procedures for the Deactivation of SALW.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -76879,7 +76879,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1361, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a. \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b. \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c. \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d. \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \\n e. \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a. \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b. \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c. \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d. \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \n e. \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -76897,7 +76897,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1361, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a. \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b. \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c. \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d. \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \\n e. \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a. \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b. \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c. \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d. \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \n e. \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -76908,14 +76908,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a.", + "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a.", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may must used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "ProcessedSent": "use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n", "SentID": 4272 }, { "ParagraphID": 1361, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a. \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b. \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c. \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d. \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \\n e. \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a. \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b. \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c. \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d. \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \n e. \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -76926,14 +76926,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b.", + "Sentence": "\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b.", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may must used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "ProcessedSent": " shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b", "SentID": 4273 }, { "ParagraphID": 1361, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a. \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b. \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c. \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d. \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \\n e. \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a. \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b. \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c. \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d. \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \n e. \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -76944,7 +76944,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c. \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d. \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \\n e. \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Sentence": "\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c. \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d. \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \n e. \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may must used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "ProcessedSent": " used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "SentID": 4274 @@ -77041,7 +77041,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1364, - "Paragraph": "Light weapon: Any man-portable lethal weapon designed for use by two or three per- sons serving as a crew (although some may be carried and used by a single person) that expels or launches, is designed to expel or launch, or may be readily converted to expel or launch a shot, bullet or projectile by the action of an explosive. \\n Note 1: Includes, inter alia, heavy machine guns, hand-held under-barrel and mounted grenade launchers, portable anti-aircraft guns, portable anti-tank guns, re- coilless rifles, portable launchers of anti- tank missile and rocket systems, portable launchers of anti-aircraft missile systems, and mortars of a calibre of less than 100 millimetres, as well as their parts, components and ammunition. \\n Note 2: Excludes antique light weapons and their replicas.", + "Paragraph": "Light weapon: Any man-portable lethal weapon designed for use by two or three per- sons serving as a crew (although some may be carried and used by a single person) that expels or launches, is designed to expel or launch, or may be readily converted to expel or launch a shot, bullet or projectile by the action of an explosive. \n Note 1: Includes, inter alia, heavy machine guns, hand-held under-barrel and mounted grenade launchers, portable anti-aircraft guns, portable anti-tank guns, re- coilless rifles, portable launchers of anti- tank missile and rocket systems, portable launchers of anti-aircraft missile systems, and mortars of a calibre of less than 100 millimetres, as well as their parts, components and ammunition. \n Note 2: Excludes antique light weapons and their replicas.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -77059,7 +77059,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1364, - "Paragraph": "Light weapon: Any man-portable lethal weapon designed for use by two or three per- sons serving as a crew (although some may be carried and used by a single person) that expels or launches, is designed to expel or launch, or may be readily converted to expel or launch a shot, bullet or projectile by the action of an explosive. \\n Note 1: Includes, inter alia, heavy machine guns, hand-held under-barrel and mounted grenade launchers, portable anti-aircraft guns, portable anti-tank guns, re- coilless rifles, portable launchers of anti- tank missile and rocket systems, portable launchers of anti-aircraft missile systems, and mortars of a calibre of less than 100 millimetres, as well as their parts, components and ammunition. \\n Note 2: Excludes antique light weapons and their replicas.", + "Paragraph": "Light weapon: Any man-portable lethal weapon designed for use by two or three per- sons serving as a crew (although some may be carried and used by a single person) that expels or launches, is designed to expel or launch, or may be readily converted to expel or launch a shot, bullet or projectile by the action of an explosive. \n Note 1: Includes, inter alia, heavy machine guns, hand-held under-barrel and mounted grenade launchers, portable anti-aircraft guns, portable anti-tank guns, re- coilless rifles, portable launchers of anti- tank missile and rocket systems, portable launchers of anti-aircraft missile systems, and mortars of a calibre of less than 100 millimetres, as well as their parts, components and ammunition. \n Note 2: Excludes antique light weapons and their replicas.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -77070,14 +77070,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Note 1: Includes, inter alia, heavy machine guns, hand-held under-barrel and mounted grenade launchers, portable anti-aircraft guns, portable anti-tank guns, re- coilless rifles, portable launchers of anti- tank missile and rocket systems, portable launchers of anti-aircraft missile systems, and mortars of a calibre of less than 100 millimetres, as well as their parts, components and ammunition.", + "Sentence": "\n Note 1: Includes, inter alia, heavy machine guns, hand-held under-barrel and mounted grenade launchers, portable anti-aircraft guns, portable anti-tank guns, re- coilless rifles, portable launchers of anti- tank missile and rocket systems, portable launchers of anti-aircraft missile systems, and mortars of a calibre of less than 100 millimetres, as well as their parts, components and ammunition.", "newParagraph": "light weapon manportable lethal weapon designed use two three per son serving crew although may carried used single person expels launch designed expel launch may readily converted expel launch shot bullet projectile action explosive n note 1 includes inter alia heavy machine gun handheld underbarrel mounted grenade launcher portable antiaircraft gun portable antitank gun coilless rifle portable launcher anti tank missile rocket system portable launcher antiaircraft missile system mortar calibre le 100 millimetre well part component ammunition n note 2 excludes antique light weapon replica", "ProcessedSent": "n note 1 includes inter alia heavy machine gun handheld underbarrel mounted grenade launcher portable antiaircraft gun portable antitank gun coilless rifle portable launcher anti tank missile rocket system portable launcher antiaircraft missile system mortar calibre le 100 millimetre well part component ammunition", "SentID": 4281 }, { "ParagraphID": 1364, - "Paragraph": "Light weapon: Any man-portable lethal weapon designed for use by two or three per- sons serving as a crew (although some may be carried and used by a single person) that expels or launches, is designed to expel or launch, or may be readily converted to expel or launch a shot, bullet or projectile by the action of an explosive. \\n Note 1: Includes, inter alia, heavy machine guns, hand-held under-barrel and mounted grenade launchers, portable anti-aircraft guns, portable anti-tank guns, re- coilless rifles, portable launchers of anti- tank missile and rocket systems, portable launchers of anti-aircraft missile systems, and mortars of a calibre of less than 100 millimetres, as well as their parts, components and ammunition. \\n Note 2: Excludes antique light weapons and their replicas.", + "Paragraph": "Light weapon: Any man-portable lethal weapon designed for use by two or three per- sons serving as a crew (although some may be carried and used by a single person) that expels or launches, is designed to expel or launch, or may be readily converted to expel or launch a shot, bullet or projectile by the action of an explosive. \n Note 1: Includes, inter alia, heavy machine guns, hand-held under-barrel and mounted grenade launchers, portable anti-aircraft guns, portable anti-tank guns, re- coilless rifles, portable launchers of anti- tank missile and rocket systems, portable launchers of anti-aircraft missile systems, and mortars of a calibre of less than 100 millimetres, as well as their parts, components and ammunition. \n Note 2: Excludes antique light weapons and their replicas.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -77088,7 +77088,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Note 2: Excludes antique light weapons and their replicas.", + "Sentence": "\n Note 2: Excludes antique light weapons and their replicas.", "newParagraph": "light weapon manportable lethal weapon designed use two three per son serving crew although may carried used single person expels launch designed expel launch may readily converted expel launch shot bullet projectile action explosive n note 1 includes inter alia heavy machine gun handheld underbarrel mounted grenade launcher portable antiaircraft gun portable antitank gun coilless rifle portable launcher anti tank missile rocket system portable launcher antiaircraft missile system mortar calibre le 100 millimetre well part component ammunition n note 2 excludes antique light weapon replica", "ProcessedSent": "n note 2 excludes antique light weapon replica", "SentID": 4282 @@ -78211,7 +78211,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1388, - "Paragraph": "Regional instruments \\n Several regional, legally binding instruments have been adopted to support the imple- mentation of the UN Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in SALW in All Its Aspects (see below).", + "Paragraph": "Regional instruments \n Several regional, legally binding instruments have been adopted to support the imple- mentation of the UN Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in SALW in All Its Aspects (see below).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -78222,14 +78222,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2 National, regional and international regulatory framework", "Heading3": "5.2.2 Legally binding instruments", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Regional instruments \\n Several regional, legally binding instruments have been adopted to support the imple- mentation of the UN Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in SALW in All Its Aspects (see below).", + "Sentence": "Regional instruments \n Several regional, legally binding instruments have been adopted to support the imple- mentation of the UN Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in SALW in All Its Aspects (see below).", "newParagraph": "regional instrument n several regional legally binding instrument adopted support imple mentation un programme action prevent combat eradicate illicit trade salw aspect see", "ProcessedSent": "regional instrument n several regional legally binding instrument adopted support imple mentation un programme action prevent combat eradicate illicit trade salw aspect see", "SentID": 4345 }, { "ParagraphID": 1389, - "Paragraph": "International instruments \\n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, which supplements the UN Con- vention against Transnational Organized Crime, was adopted in the context of crime prevention and law enforcement. State parties to the legally binding treaty agreed to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit manufacturing of and traffick- ing in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. \\n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international legal trade in conventional arms and seeks to prevent and eradicate their diversion to the illicit market by es- tablishing international standards governing arms transfers. The Treaty addresses the relationship between conventional arms transfers and the commission of gen- der-based violence. It requires States parties to assess the risk of the transferred conventional arms being used to commit or facilitate serious acts of gender-based violence or serious acts of violence against women and children. \\n United Nations human rights conventions, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, as interpreted by their universal oversight mechanisms, require States to curb the proliferation of small arms and regulate access to them as part of the duty to protect the right to life. \\n\\n Other binding instruments may be relevant, including the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention, the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons and the Conven- tion on Cluster Munitions. Security Council resolutions related to counter-terrorism as well as the Security Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum may also be relevant.", + "Paragraph": "International instruments \n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, which supplements the UN Con- vention against Transnational Organized Crime, was adopted in the context of crime prevention and law enforcement. State parties to the legally binding treaty agreed to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit manufacturing of and traffick- ing in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. \n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international legal trade in conventional arms and seeks to prevent and eradicate their diversion to the illicit market by es- tablishing international standards governing arms transfers. The Treaty addresses the relationship between conventional arms transfers and the commission of gen- der-based violence. It requires States parties to assess the risk of the transferred conventional arms being used to commit or facilitate serious acts of gender-based violence or serious acts of violence against women and children. \n United Nations human rights conventions, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, as interpreted by their universal oversight mechanisms, require States to curb the proliferation of small arms and regulate access to them as part of the duty to protect the right to life. \n\n Other binding instruments may be relevant, including the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention, the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons and the Conven- tion on Cluster Munitions. Security Council resolutions related to counter-terrorism as well as the Security Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum may also be relevant.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -78240,14 +78240,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2 National, regional and international regulatory framework", "Heading3": "5.2.2 Legally binding instruments", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "International instruments \\n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, which supplements the UN Con- vention against Transnational Organized Crime, was adopted in the context of crime prevention and law enforcement.", + "Sentence": "International instruments \n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, which supplements the UN Con- vention against Transnational Organized Crime, was adopted in the context of crime prevention and law enforcement.", "newParagraph": "international instrument n protocol illicit manufacturing trafficking firearm part component ammunition supplement un con vention transnational organized crime adopted context crime prevention law enforcement state party legally binding treaty agreed prevent combat eradicate illicit manufacturing traffick ing firearm part component ammunition n arm trade treaty regulates international legal trade conventional arm seek prevent eradicate diversion illicit market e tablishing international standard governing arm transfer treaty address relationship conventional arm transfer commission gen derbased violence requires state party ass risk transferred conventional arm used commit facilitate serious act genderbased violence serious act violence woman child n united nation human right convention international covenant civil political right interpreted universal oversight mechanism require state curb proliferation small arm regulate access part duty protect right life nn binding instrument may relevant including antipersonnel mine ban convention convention certain conventional weapon conven tion cluster munition security council resolution related counterterrorism well security council 2015 madrid guiding principle 2018 addendum may also relevant", "ProcessedSent": "international instrument n protocol illicit manufacturing trafficking firearm part component ammunition supplement un con vention transnational organized crime adopted context crime prevention law enforcement", "SentID": 4346 }, { "ParagraphID": 1389, - "Paragraph": "International instruments \\n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, which supplements the UN Con- vention against Transnational Organized Crime, was adopted in the context of crime prevention and law enforcement. State parties to the legally binding treaty agreed to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit manufacturing of and traffick- ing in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. \\n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international legal trade in conventional arms and seeks to prevent and eradicate their diversion to the illicit market by es- tablishing international standards governing arms transfers. The Treaty addresses the relationship between conventional arms transfers and the commission of gen- der-based violence. It requires States parties to assess the risk of the transferred conventional arms being used to commit or facilitate serious acts of gender-based violence or serious acts of violence against women and children. \\n United Nations human rights conventions, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, as interpreted by their universal oversight mechanisms, require States to curb the proliferation of small arms and regulate access to them as part of the duty to protect the right to life. \\n\\n Other binding instruments may be relevant, including the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention, the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons and the Conven- tion on Cluster Munitions. Security Council resolutions related to counter-terrorism as well as the Security Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum may also be relevant.", + "Paragraph": "International instruments \n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, which supplements the UN Con- vention against Transnational Organized Crime, was adopted in the context of crime prevention and law enforcement. State parties to the legally binding treaty agreed to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit manufacturing of and traffick- ing in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. \n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international legal trade in conventional arms and seeks to prevent and eradicate their diversion to the illicit market by es- tablishing international standards governing arms transfers. The Treaty addresses the relationship between conventional arms transfers and the commission of gen- der-based violence. It requires States parties to assess the risk of the transferred conventional arms being used to commit or facilitate serious acts of gender-based violence or serious acts of violence against women and children. \n United Nations human rights conventions, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, as interpreted by their universal oversight mechanisms, require States to curb the proliferation of small arms and regulate access to them as part of the duty to protect the right to life. \n\n Other binding instruments may be relevant, including the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention, the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons and the Conven- tion on Cluster Munitions. Security Council resolutions related to counter-terrorism as well as the Security Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum may also be relevant.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -78265,7 +78265,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1389, - "Paragraph": "International instruments \\n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, which supplements the UN Con- vention against Transnational Organized Crime, was adopted in the context of crime prevention and law enforcement. State parties to the legally binding treaty agreed to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit manufacturing of and traffick- ing in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. \\n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international legal trade in conventional arms and seeks to prevent and eradicate their diversion to the illicit market by es- tablishing international standards governing arms transfers. The Treaty addresses the relationship between conventional arms transfers and the commission of gen- der-based violence. It requires States parties to assess the risk of the transferred conventional arms being used to commit or facilitate serious acts of gender-based violence or serious acts of violence against women and children. \\n United Nations human rights conventions, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, as interpreted by their universal oversight mechanisms, require States to curb the proliferation of small arms and regulate access to them as part of the duty to protect the right to life. \\n\\n Other binding instruments may be relevant, including the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention, the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons and the Conven- tion on Cluster Munitions. Security Council resolutions related to counter-terrorism as well as the Security Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum may also be relevant.", + "Paragraph": "International instruments \n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, which supplements the UN Con- vention against Transnational Organized Crime, was adopted in the context of crime prevention and law enforcement. State parties to the legally binding treaty agreed to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit manufacturing of and traffick- ing in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. \n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international legal trade in conventional arms and seeks to prevent and eradicate their diversion to the illicit market by es- tablishing international standards governing arms transfers. The Treaty addresses the relationship between conventional arms transfers and the commission of gen- der-based violence. It requires States parties to assess the risk of the transferred conventional arms being used to commit or facilitate serious acts of gender-based violence or serious acts of violence against women and children. \n United Nations human rights conventions, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, as interpreted by their universal oversight mechanisms, require States to curb the proliferation of small arms and regulate access to them as part of the duty to protect the right to life. \n\n Other binding instruments may be relevant, including the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention, the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons and the Conven- tion on Cluster Munitions. Security Council resolutions related to counter-terrorism as well as the Security Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum may also be relevant.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -78276,14 +78276,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2 National, regional and international regulatory framework", "Heading3": "5.2.2 Legally binding instruments", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international legal trade in conventional arms and seeks to prevent and eradicate their diversion to the illicit market by es- tablishing international standards governing arms transfers.", + "Sentence": "\n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international legal trade in conventional arms and seeks to prevent and eradicate their diversion to the illicit market by es- tablishing international standards governing arms transfers.", "newParagraph": "international instrument n protocol illicit manufacturing trafficking firearm part component ammunition supplement un con vention transnational organized crime adopted context crime prevention law enforcement state party legally binding treaty agreed prevent combat eradicate illicit manufacturing traffick ing firearm part component ammunition n arm trade treaty regulates international legal trade conventional arm seek prevent eradicate diversion illicit market e tablishing international standard governing arm transfer treaty address relationship conventional arm transfer commission gen derbased violence requires state party ass risk transferred conventional arm used commit facilitate serious act genderbased violence serious act violence woman child n united nation human right convention international covenant civil political right interpreted universal oversight mechanism require state curb proliferation small arm regulate access part duty protect right life nn binding instrument may relevant including antipersonnel mine ban convention convention certain conventional weapon conven tion cluster munition security council resolution related counterterrorism well security council 2015 madrid guiding principle 2018 addendum may also relevant", "ProcessedSent": "n arm trade treaty regulates international legal trade conventional arm seek prevent eradicate diversion illicit market e tablishing international standard governing arm transfer", "SentID": 4348 }, { "ParagraphID": 1389, - "Paragraph": "International instruments \\n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, which supplements the UN Con- vention against Transnational Organized Crime, was adopted in the context of crime prevention and law enforcement. State parties to the legally binding treaty agreed to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit manufacturing of and traffick- ing in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. \\n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international legal trade in conventional arms and seeks to prevent and eradicate their diversion to the illicit market by es- tablishing international standards governing arms transfers. The Treaty addresses the relationship between conventional arms transfers and the commission of gen- der-based violence. It requires States parties to assess the risk of the transferred conventional arms being used to commit or facilitate serious acts of gender-based violence or serious acts of violence against women and children. \\n United Nations human rights conventions, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, as interpreted by their universal oversight mechanisms, require States to curb the proliferation of small arms and regulate access to them as part of the duty to protect the right to life. \\n\\n Other binding instruments may be relevant, including the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention, the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons and the Conven- tion on Cluster Munitions. Security Council resolutions related to counter-terrorism as well as the Security Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum may also be relevant.", + "Paragraph": "International instruments \n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, which supplements the UN Con- vention against Transnational Organized Crime, was adopted in the context of crime prevention and law enforcement. State parties to the legally binding treaty agreed to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit manufacturing of and traffick- ing in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. \n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international legal trade in conventional arms and seeks to prevent and eradicate their diversion to the illicit market by es- tablishing international standards governing arms transfers. The Treaty addresses the relationship between conventional arms transfers and the commission of gen- der-based violence. It requires States parties to assess the risk of the transferred conventional arms being used to commit or facilitate serious acts of gender-based violence or serious acts of violence against women and children. \n United Nations human rights conventions, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, as interpreted by their universal oversight mechanisms, require States to curb the proliferation of small arms and regulate access to them as part of the duty to protect the right to life. \n\n Other binding instruments may be relevant, including the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention, the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons and the Conven- tion on Cluster Munitions. Security Council resolutions related to counter-terrorism as well as the Security Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum may also be relevant.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -78301,7 +78301,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1389, - "Paragraph": "International instruments \\n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, which supplements the UN Con- vention against Transnational Organized Crime, was adopted in the context of crime prevention and law enforcement. State parties to the legally binding treaty agreed to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit manufacturing of and traffick- ing in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. \\n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international legal trade in conventional arms and seeks to prevent and eradicate their diversion to the illicit market by es- tablishing international standards governing arms transfers. The Treaty addresses the relationship between conventional arms transfers and the commission of gen- der-based violence. It requires States parties to assess the risk of the transferred conventional arms being used to commit or facilitate serious acts of gender-based violence or serious acts of violence against women and children. \\n United Nations human rights conventions, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, as interpreted by their universal oversight mechanisms, require States to curb the proliferation of small arms and regulate access to them as part of the duty to protect the right to life. \\n\\n Other binding instruments may be relevant, including the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention, the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons and the Conven- tion on Cluster Munitions. Security Council resolutions related to counter-terrorism as well as the Security Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum may also be relevant.", + "Paragraph": "International instruments \n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, which supplements the UN Con- vention against Transnational Organized Crime, was adopted in the context of crime prevention and law enforcement. State parties to the legally binding treaty agreed to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit manufacturing of and traffick- ing in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. \n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international legal trade in conventional arms and seeks to prevent and eradicate their diversion to the illicit market by es- tablishing international standards governing arms transfers. The Treaty addresses the relationship between conventional arms transfers and the commission of gen- der-based violence. It requires States parties to assess the risk of the transferred conventional arms being used to commit or facilitate serious acts of gender-based violence or serious acts of violence against women and children. \n United Nations human rights conventions, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, as interpreted by their universal oversight mechanisms, require States to curb the proliferation of small arms and regulate access to them as part of the duty to protect the right to life. \n\n Other binding instruments may be relevant, including the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention, the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons and the Conven- tion on Cluster Munitions. Security Council resolutions related to counter-terrorism as well as the Security Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum may also be relevant.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -78319,7 +78319,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1389, - "Paragraph": "International instruments \\n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, which supplements the UN Con- vention against Transnational Organized Crime, was adopted in the context of crime prevention and law enforcement. State parties to the legally binding treaty agreed to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit manufacturing of and traffick- ing in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. \\n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international legal trade in conventional arms and seeks to prevent and eradicate their diversion to the illicit market by es- tablishing international standards governing arms transfers. The Treaty addresses the relationship between conventional arms transfers and the commission of gen- der-based violence. It requires States parties to assess the risk of the transferred conventional arms being used to commit or facilitate serious acts of gender-based violence or serious acts of violence against women and children. \\n United Nations human rights conventions, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, as interpreted by their universal oversight mechanisms, require States to curb the proliferation of small arms and regulate access to them as part of the duty to protect the right to life. \\n\\n Other binding instruments may be relevant, including the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention, the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons and the Conven- tion on Cluster Munitions. Security Council resolutions related to counter-terrorism as well as the Security Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum may also be relevant.", + "Paragraph": "International instruments \n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, which supplements the UN Con- vention against Transnational Organized Crime, was adopted in the context of crime prevention and law enforcement. State parties to the legally binding treaty agreed to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit manufacturing of and traffick- ing in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. \n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international legal trade in conventional arms and seeks to prevent and eradicate their diversion to the illicit market by es- tablishing international standards governing arms transfers. The Treaty addresses the relationship between conventional arms transfers and the commission of gen- der-based violence. It requires States parties to assess the risk of the transferred conventional arms being used to commit or facilitate serious acts of gender-based violence or serious acts of violence against women and children. \n United Nations human rights conventions, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, as interpreted by their universal oversight mechanisms, require States to curb the proliferation of small arms and regulate access to them as part of the duty to protect the right to life. \n\n Other binding instruments may be relevant, including the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention, the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons and the Conven- tion on Cluster Munitions. Security Council resolutions related to counter-terrorism as well as the Security Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum may also be relevant.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -78330,14 +78330,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2 National, regional and international regulatory framework", "Heading3": "5.2.2 Legally binding instruments", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n United Nations human rights conventions, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, as interpreted by their universal oversight mechanisms, require States to curb the proliferation of small arms and regulate access to them as part of the duty to protect the right to life.", + "Sentence": "\n United Nations human rights conventions, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, as interpreted by their universal oversight mechanisms, require States to curb the proliferation of small arms and regulate access to them as part of the duty to protect the right to life.", "newParagraph": "international instrument n protocol illicit manufacturing trafficking firearm part component ammunition supplement un con vention transnational organized crime adopted context crime prevention law enforcement state party legally binding treaty agreed prevent combat eradicate illicit manufacturing traffick ing firearm part component ammunition n arm trade treaty regulates international legal trade conventional arm seek prevent eradicate diversion illicit market e tablishing international standard governing arm transfer treaty address relationship conventional arm transfer commission gen derbased violence requires state party ass risk transferred conventional arm used commit facilitate serious act genderbased violence serious act violence woman child n united nation human right convention international covenant civil political right interpreted universal oversight mechanism require state curb proliferation small arm regulate access part duty protect right life nn binding instrument may relevant including antipersonnel mine ban convention convention certain conventional weapon conven tion cluster munition security council resolution related counterterrorism well security council 2015 madrid guiding principle 2018 addendum may also relevant", "ProcessedSent": "n united nation human right convention international covenant civil political right interpreted universal oversight mechanism require state curb proliferation small arm regulate access part duty protect right life", "SentID": 4351 }, { "ParagraphID": 1389, - "Paragraph": "International instruments \\n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, which supplements the UN Con- vention against Transnational Organized Crime, was adopted in the context of crime prevention and law enforcement. State parties to the legally binding treaty agreed to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit manufacturing of and traffick- ing in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. \\n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international legal trade in conventional arms and seeks to prevent and eradicate their diversion to the illicit market by es- tablishing international standards governing arms transfers. The Treaty addresses the relationship between conventional arms transfers and the commission of gen- der-based violence. It requires States parties to assess the risk of the transferred conventional arms being used to commit or facilitate serious acts of gender-based violence or serious acts of violence against women and children. \\n United Nations human rights conventions, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, as interpreted by their universal oversight mechanisms, require States to curb the proliferation of small arms and regulate access to them as part of the duty to protect the right to life. \\n\\n Other binding instruments may be relevant, including the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention, the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons and the Conven- tion on Cluster Munitions. Security Council resolutions related to counter-terrorism as well as the Security Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum may also be relevant.", + "Paragraph": "International instruments \n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, which supplements the UN Con- vention against Transnational Organized Crime, was adopted in the context of crime prevention and law enforcement. State parties to the legally binding treaty agreed to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit manufacturing of and traffick- ing in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. \n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international legal trade in conventional arms and seeks to prevent and eradicate their diversion to the illicit market by es- tablishing international standards governing arms transfers. The Treaty addresses the relationship between conventional arms transfers and the commission of gen- der-based violence. It requires States parties to assess the risk of the transferred conventional arms being used to commit or facilitate serious acts of gender-based violence or serious acts of violence against women and children. \n United Nations human rights conventions, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, as interpreted by their universal oversight mechanisms, require States to curb the proliferation of small arms and regulate access to them as part of the duty to protect the right to life. \n\n Other binding instruments may be relevant, including the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention, the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons and the Conven- tion on Cluster Munitions. Security Council resolutions related to counter-terrorism as well as the Security Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum may also be relevant.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -78348,14 +78348,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2 National, regional and international regulatory framework", "Heading3": "5.2.2 Legally binding instruments", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Other binding instruments may be relevant, including the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention, the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons and the Conven- tion on Cluster Munitions.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Other binding instruments may be relevant, including the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention, the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons and the Conven- tion on Cluster Munitions.", "newParagraph": "international instrument n protocol illicit manufacturing trafficking firearm part component ammunition supplement un con vention transnational organized crime adopted context crime prevention law enforcement state party legally binding treaty agreed prevent combat eradicate illicit manufacturing traffick ing firearm part component ammunition n arm trade treaty regulates international legal trade conventional arm seek prevent eradicate diversion illicit market e tablishing international standard governing arm transfer treaty address relationship conventional arm transfer commission gen derbased violence requires state party ass risk transferred conventional arm used commit facilitate serious act genderbased violence serious act violence woman child n united nation human right convention international covenant civil political right interpreted universal oversight mechanism require state curb proliferation small arm regulate access part duty protect right life nn binding instrument may relevant including antipersonnel mine ban convention convention certain conventional weapon conven tion cluster munition security council resolution related counterterrorism well security council 2015 madrid guiding principle 2018 addendum may also relevant", "ProcessedSent": "nn binding instrument may relevant including antipersonnel mine ban convention convention certain conventional weapon conven tion cluster munition", "SentID": 4352 }, { "ParagraphID": 1389, - "Paragraph": "International instruments \\n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, which supplements the UN Con- vention against Transnational Organized Crime, was adopted in the context of crime prevention and law enforcement. State parties to the legally binding treaty agreed to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit manufacturing of and traffick- ing in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. \\n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international legal trade in conventional arms and seeks to prevent and eradicate their diversion to the illicit market by es- tablishing international standards governing arms transfers. The Treaty addresses the relationship between conventional arms transfers and the commission of gen- der-based violence. It requires States parties to assess the risk of the transferred conventional arms being used to commit or facilitate serious acts of gender-based violence or serious acts of violence against women and children. \\n United Nations human rights conventions, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, as interpreted by their universal oversight mechanisms, require States to curb the proliferation of small arms and regulate access to them as part of the duty to protect the right to life. \\n\\n Other binding instruments may be relevant, including the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention, the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons and the Conven- tion on Cluster Munitions. Security Council resolutions related to counter-terrorism as well as the Security Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum may also be relevant.", + "Paragraph": "International instruments \n The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, which supplements the UN Con- vention against Transnational Organized Crime, was adopted in the context of crime prevention and law enforcement. State parties to the legally binding treaty agreed to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit manufacturing of and traffick- ing in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. \n The Arms Trade Treaty regulates the international legal trade in conventional arms and seeks to prevent and eradicate their diversion to the illicit market by es- tablishing international standards governing arms transfers. The Treaty addresses the relationship between conventional arms transfers and the commission of gen- der-based violence. It requires States parties to assess the risk of the transferred conventional arms being used to commit or facilitate serious acts of gender-based violence or serious acts of violence against women and children. \n United Nations human rights conventions, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, as interpreted by their universal oversight mechanisms, require States to curb the proliferation of small arms and regulate access to them as part of the duty to protect the right to life. \n\n Other binding instruments may be relevant, including the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention, the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons and the Conven- tion on Cluster Munitions. Security Council resolutions related to counter-terrorism as well as the Security Council\u2019s 2015 Madrid Guiding Principles and its 2018 Addendum may also be relevant.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -78373,7 +78373,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1390, - "Paragraph": "Politically binding instruments \\n The UN Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects (PoA) addresses the illicit trade in SALW with the objective of reducing human suffering. The PoA consists of commit- ments at the national, regional and global levels to combat the illicit trade in SALW. \\n The International Tracing Instrument, which was adopted within the framework of the PoA, promotes the development of marking, record-keeping and tracing meas- ures for SALW. \\n The Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Offi- cials is also relevant for planning and designing transitional WAM where inter-linkages between SSR and DDR exist.", + "Paragraph": "Politically binding instruments \n The UN Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects (PoA) addresses the illicit trade in SALW with the objective of reducing human suffering. The PoA consists of commit- ments at the national, regional and global levels to combat the illicit trade in SALW. \n The International Tracing Instrument, which was adopted within the framework of the PoA, promotes the development of marking, record-keeping and tracing meas- ures for SALW. \n The Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Offi- cials is also relevant for planning and designing transitional WAM where inter-linkages between SSR and DDR exist.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -78384,14 +78384,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2 National, regional and international regulatory framework", "Heading3": "5.2.2 Legally binding instruments", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Politically binding instruments \\n The UN Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects (PoA) addresses the illicit trade in SALW with the objective of reducing human suffering.", + "Sentence": "Politically binding instruments \n The UN Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects (PoA) addresses the illicit trade in SALW with the objective of reducing human suffering.", "newParagraph": "politically binding instrument n un programme action prevent combat eradicate illicit trade small arm light weapon aspect poa address illicit trade salw objective reducing human suffering poa consists commit ments national regional global level combat illicit trade salw n international tracing instrument adopted within framework poa promotes development marking recordkeeping tracing meas ures salw n basic principle use force firearm law enforcement offi cials also relevant planning designing transitional wam interlinkages ssr ddr exist", "ProcessedSent": "politically binding instrument n un programme action prevent combat eradicate illicit trade small arm light weapon aspect poa address illicit trade salw objective reducing human suffering", "SentID": 4354 }, { "ParagraphID": 1390, - "Paragraph": "Politically binding instruments \\n The UN Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects (PoA) addresses the illicit trade in SALW with the objective of reducing human suffering. The PoA consists of commit- ments at the national, regional and global levels to combat the illicit trade in SALW. \\n The International Tracing Instrument, which was adopted within the framework of the PoA, promotes the development of marking, record-keeping and tracing meas- ures for SALW. \\n The Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Offi- cials is also relevant for planning and designing transitional WAM where inter-linkages between SSR and DDR exist.", + "Paragraph": "Politically binding instruments \n The UN Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects (PoA) addresses the illicit trade in SALW with the objective of reducing human suffering. The PoA consists of commit- ments at the national, regional and global levels to combat the illicit trade in SALW. \n The International Tracing Instrument, which was adopted within the framework of the PoA, promotes the development of marking, record-keeping and tracing meas- ures for SALW. \n The Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Offi- cials is also relevant for planning and designing transitional WAM where inter-linkages between SSR and DDR exist.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -78409,7 +78409,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1390, - "Paragraph": "Politically binding instruments \\n The UN Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects (PoA) addresses the illicit trade in SALW with the objective of reducing human suffering. The PoA consists of commit- ments at the national, regional and global levels to combat the illicit trade in SALW. \\n The International Tracing Instrument, which was adopted within the framework of the PoA, promotes the development of marking, record-keeping and tracing meas- ures for SALW. \\n The Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Offi- cials is also relevant for planning and designing transitional WAM where inter-linkages between SSR and DDR exist.", + "Paragraph": "Politically binding instruments \n The UN Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects (PoA) addresses the illicit trade in SALW with the objective of reducing human suffering. The PoA consists of commit- ments at the national, regional and global levels to combat the illicit trade in SALW. \n The International Tracing Instrument, which was adopted within the framework of the PoA, promotes the development of marking, record-keeping and tracing meas- ures for SALW. \n The Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Offi- cials is also relevant for planning and designing transitional WAM where inter-linkages between SSR and DDR exist.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -78420,14 +78420,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2 National, regional and international regulatory framework", "Heading3": "5.2.2 Legally binding instruments", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The International Tracing Instrument, which was adopted within the framework of the PoA, promotes the development of marking, record-keeping and tracing meas- ures for SALW.", + "Sentence": "\n The International Tracing Instrument, which was adopted within the framework of the PoA, promotes the development of marking, record-keeping and tracing meas- ures for SALW.", "newParagraph": "politically binding instrument n un programme action prevent combat eradicate illicit trade small arm light weapon aspect poa address illicit trade salw objective reducing human suffering poa consists commit ments national regional global level combat illicit trade salw n international tracing instrument adopted within framework poa promotes development marking recordkeeping tracing meas ures salw n basic principle use force firearm law enforcement offi cials also relevant planning designing transitional wam interlinkages ssr ddr exist", "ProcessedSent": "n international tracing instrument adopted within framework poa promotes development marking recordkeeping tracing meas ures salw", "SentID": 4356 }, { "ParagraphID": 1390, - "Paragraph": "Politically binding instruments \\n The UN Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects (PoA) addresses the illicit trade in SALW with the objective of reducing human suffering. The PoA consists of commit- ments at the national, regional and global levels to combat the illicit trade in SALW. \\n The International Tracing Instrument, which was adopted within the framework of the PoA, promotes the development of marking, record-keeping and tracing meas- ures for SALW. \\n The Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Offi- cials is also relevant for planning and designing transitional WAM where inter-linkages between SSR and DDR exist.", + "Paragraph": "Politically binding instruments \n The UN Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects (PoA) addresses the illicit trade in SALW with the objective of reducing human suffering. The PoA consists of commit- ments at the national, regional and global levels to combat the illicit trade in SALW. \n The International Tracing Instrument, which was adopted within the framework of the PoA, promotes the development of marking, record-keeping and tracing meas- ures for SALW. \n The Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Offi- cials is also relevant for planning and designing transitional WAM where inter-linkages between SSR and DDR exist.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -78438,7 +78438,7 @@ "Heading2": "5.2 National, regional and international regulatory framework", "Heading3": "5.2.2 Legally binding instruments", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Offi- cials is also relevant for planning and designing transitional WAM where inter-linkages between SSR and DDR exist.", + "Sentence": "\n The Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Offi- cials is also relevant for planning and designing transitional WAM where inter-linkages between SSR and DDR exist.", "newParagraph": "politically binding instrument n un programme action prevent combat eradicate illicit trade small arm light weapon aspect poa address illicit trade salw objective reducing human suffering poa consists commit ments national regional global level combat illicit trade salw n international tracing instrument adopted within framework poa promotes development marking recordkeeping tracing meas ures salw n basic principle use force firearm law enforcement offi cials also relevant planning designing transitional wam interlinkages ssr ddr exist", "ProcessedSent": "n basic principle use force firearm law enforcement offi cials also relevant planning designing transitional wam interlinkages ssr ddr exist", "SentID": 4357 @@ -78625,7 +78625,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1394, - "Paragraph": "When part of a DDR process, transitional WAM should be considered when there is a need to respond to the presence of active and\/or former members of armed groups. For example, transitional WAM may be appropriate when: \\n Armed groups refuse to disarm as the pre-conditions for a DDR programme are not in place. \\n Former combatants and\/or persons formerly associated with armed groups return to their communities with weapons, ammunition and\/or explosives, perhaps be- cause of ongoing insecurity or because weapons possession is a cultural practice or tied to notions of power and masculinity. \\n Weapons and ammunition are circulating in communities and pose a security threat, especially where: \\n\\n Civilians, including in certain contexts children, are at-risk of recruitment by armed groups; \\n\\n Civilians, including women, girls, men and boys, are at risk of serious interna- tional crimes, including conflict-related sexual violence. \\n\\n Former combatants and\/or persons formerly associated with armed groups are about to return as part of DDR programmes.", + "Paragraph": "When part of a DDR process, transitional WAM should be considered when there is a need to respond to the presence of active and\/or former members of armed groups. For example, transitional WAM may be appropriate when: \n Armed groups refuse to disarm as the pre-conditions for a DDR programme are not in place. \n Former combatants and\/or persons formerly associated with armed groups return to their communities with weapons, ammunition and\/or explosives, perhaps be- cause of ongoing insecurity or because weapons possession is a cultural practice or tied to notions of power and masculinity. \n Weapons and ammunition are circulating in communities and pose a security threat, especially where: \n\n Civilians, including in certain contexts children, are at-risk of recruitment by armed groups; \n\n Civilians, including women, girls, men and boys, are at risk of serious interna- tional crimes, including conflict-related sexual violence. \n\n Former combatants and\/or persons formerly associated with armed groups are about to return as part of DDR programmes.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -78643,7 +78643,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1394, - "Paragraph": "When part of a DDR process, transitional WAM should be considered when there is a need to respond to the presence of active and\/or former members of armed groups. For example, transitional WAM may be appropriate when: \\n Armed groups refuse to disarm as the pre-conditions for a DDR programme are not in place. \\n Former combatants and\/or persons formerly associated with armed groups return to their communities with weapons, ammunition and\/or explosives, perhaps be- cause of ongoing insecurity or because weapons possession is a cultural practice or tied to notions of power and masculinity. \\n Weapons and ammunition are circulating in communities and pose a security threat, especially where: \\n\\n Civilians, including in certain contexts children, are at-risk of recruitment by armed groups; \\n\\n Civilians, including women, girls, men and boys, are at risk of serious interna- tional crimes, including conflict-related sexual violence. \\n\\n Former combatants and\/or persons formerly associated with armed groups are about to return as part of DDR programmes.", + "Paragraph": "When part of a DDR process, transitional WAM should be considered when there is a need to respond to the presence of active and\/or former members of armed groups. For example, transitional WAM may be appropriate when: \n Armed groups refuse to disarm as the pre-conditions for a DDR programme are not in place. \n Former combatants and\/or persons formerly associated with armed groups return to their communities with weapons, ammunition and\/or explosives, perhaps be- cause of ongoing insecurity or because weapons possession is a cultural practice or tied to notions of power and masculinity. \n Weapons and ammunition are circulating in communities and pose a security threat, especially where: \n\n Civilians, including in certain contexts children, are at-risk of recruitment by armed groups; \n\n Civilians, including women, girls, men and boys, are at risk of serious interna- tional crimes, including conflict-related sexual violence. \n\n Former combatants and\/or persons formerly associated with armed groups are about to return as part of DDR programmes.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -78654,14 +78654,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "For example, transitional WAM may be appropriate when: \\n Armed groups refuse to disarm as the pre-conditions for a DDR programme are not in place.", + "Sentence": "For example, transitional WAM may be appropriate when: \n Armed groups refuse to disarm as the pre-conditions for a DDR programme are not in place.", "newParagraph": "part ddr process transitional wam considered need respond presence active andor former member armed group example transitional wam may appropriate n armed group refuse disarm precondition ddr programme place n former combatant andor person formerly associated armed group return community weapon ammunition andor explosive perhaps cause ongoing insecurity weapon possession cultural practice tied notion power masculinity n weapon ammunition circulating community pose security threat especially nn civilian including certain context child atrisk recruitment armed group nn civilian including woman girl men boy risk serious interna tional crime including conflictrelated sexual violence nn former combatant andor person formerly associated armed group return part ddr programme", "ProcessedSent": "example transitional wam may appropriate n armed group refuse disarm precondition ddr programme place", "SentID": 4369 }, { "ParagraphID": 1394, - "Paragraph": "When part of a DDR process, transitional WAM should be considered when there is a need to respond to the presence of active and\/or former members of armed groups. For example, transitional WAM may be appropriate when: \\n Armed groups refuse to disarm as the pre-conditions for a DDR programme are not in place. \\n Former combatants and\/or persons formerly associated with armed groups return to their communities with weapons, ammunition and\/or explosives, perhaps be- cause of ongoing insecurity or because weapons possession is a cultural practice or tied to notions of power and masculinity. \\n Weapons and ammunition are circulating in communities and pose a security threat, especially where: \\n\\n Civilians, including in certain contexts children, are at-risk of recruitment by armed groups; \\n\\n Civilians, including women, girls, men and boys, are at risk of serious interna- tional crimes, including conflict-related sexual violence. \\n\\n Former combatants and\/or persons formerly associated with armed groups are about to return as part of DDR programmes.", + "Paragraph": "When part of a DDR process, transitional WAM should be considered when there is a need to respond to the presence of active and\/or former members of armed groups. For example, transitional WAM may be appropriate when: \n Armed groups refuse to disarm as the pre-conditions for a DDR programme are not in place. \n Former combatants and\/or persons formerly associated with armed groups return to their communities with weapons, ammunition and\/or explosives, perhaps be- cause of ongoing insecurity or because weapons possession is a cultural practice or tied to notions of power and masculinity. \n Weapons and ammunition are circulating in communities and pose a security threat, especially where: \n\n Civilians, including in certain contexts children, are at-risk of recruitment by armed groups; \n\n Civilians, including women, girls, men and boys, are at risk of serious interna- tional crimes, including conflict-related sexual violence. \n\n Former combatants and\/or persons formerly associated with armed groups are about to return as part of DDR programmes.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -78672,14 +78672,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Former combatants and\/or persons formerly associated with armed groups return to their communities with weapons, ammunition and\/or explosives, perhaps be- cause of ongoing insecurity or because weapons possession is a cultural practice or tied to notions of power and masculinity.", + "Sentence": "\n Former combatants and\/or persons formerly associated with armed groups return to their communities with weapons, ammunition and\/or explosives, perhaps be- cause of ongoing insecurity or because weapons possession is a cultural practice or tied to notions of power and masculinity.", "newParagraph": "part ddr process transitional wam considered need respond presence active andor former member armed group example transitional wam may appropriate n armed group refuse disarm precondition ddr programme place n former combatant andor person formerly associated armed group return community weapon ammunition andor explosive perhaps cause ongoing insecurity weapon possession cultural practice tied notion power masculinity n weapon ammunition circulating community pose security threat especially nn civilian including certain context child atrisk recruitment armed group nn civilian including woman girl men boy risk serious interna tional crime including conflictrelated sexual violence nn former combatant andor person formerly associated armed group return part ddr programme", "ProcessedSent": "n former combatant andor person formerly associated armed group return community weapon ammunition andor explosive perhaps cause ongoing insecurity weapon possession cultural practice tied notion power masculinity", "SentID": 4370 }, { "ParagraphID": 1394, - "Paragraph": "When part of a DDR process, transitional WAM should be considered when there is a need to respond to the presence of active and\/or former members of armed groups. For example, transitional WAM may be appropriate when: \\n Armed groups refuse to disarm as the pre-conditions for a DDR programme are not in place. \\n Former combatants and\/or persons formerly associated with armed groups return to their communities with weapons, ammunition and\/or explosives, perhaps be- cause of ongoing insecurity or because weapons possession is a cultural practice or tied to notions of power and masculinity. \\n Weapons and ammunition are circulating in communities and pose a security threat, especially where: \\n\\n Civilians, including in certain contexts children, are at-risk of recruitment by armed groups; \\n\\n Civilians, including women, girls, men and boys, are at risk of serious interna- tional crimes, including conflict-related sexual violence. \\n\\n Former combatants and\/or persons formerly associated with armed groups are about to return as part of DDR programmes.", + "Paragraph": "When part of a DDR process, transitional WAM should be considered when there is a need to respond to the presence of active and\/or former members of armed groups. For example, transitional WAM may be appropriate when: \n Armed groups refuse to disarm as the pre-conditions for a DDR programme are not in place. \n Former combatants and\/or persons formerly associated with armed groups return to their communities with weapons, ammunition and\/or explosives, perhaps be- cause of ongoing insecurity or because weapons possession is a cultural practice or tied to notions of power and masculinity. \n Weapons and ammunition are circulating in communities and pose a security threat, especially where: \n\n Civilians, including in certain contexts children, are at-risk of recruitment by armed groups; \n\n Civilians, including women, girls, men and boys, are at risk of serious interna- tional crimes, including conflict-related sexual violence. \n\n Former combatants and\/or persons formerly associated with armed groups are about to return as part of DDR programmes.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -78690,14 +78690,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Weapons and ammunition are circulating in communities and pose a security threat, especially where: \\n\\n Civilians, including in certain contexts children, are at-risk of recruitment by armed groups; \\n\\n Civilians, including women, girls, men and boys, are at risk of serious interna- tional crimes, including conflict-related sexual violence.", + "Sentence": "\n Weapons and ammunition are circulating in communities and pose a security threat, especially where: \n\n Civilians, including in certain contexts children, are at-risk of recruitment by armed groups; \n\n Civilians, including women, girls, men and boys, are at risk of serious interna- tional crimes, including conflict-related sexual violence.", "newParagraph": "part ddr process transitional wam considered need respond presence active andor former member armed group example transitional wam may appropriate n armed group refuse disarm precondition ddr programme place n former combatant andor person formerly associated armed group return community weapon ammunition andor explosive perhaps cause ongoing insecurity weapon possession cultural practice tied notion power masculinity n weapon ammunition circulating community pose security threat especially nn civilian including certain context child atrisk recruitment armed group nn civilian including woman girl men boy risk serious interna tional crime including conflictrelated sexual violence nn former combatant andor person formerly associated armed group return part ddr programme", "ProcessedSent": "n weapon ammunition circulating community pose security threat especially nn civilian including certain context child atrisk recruitment armed group nn civilian including woman girl men boy risk serious interna tional crime including conflictrelated sexual violence", "SentID": 4371 }, { "ParagraphID": 1394, - "Paragraph": "When part of a DDR process, transitional WAM should be considered when there is a need to respond to the presence of active and\/or former members of armed groups. For example, transitional WAM may be appropriate when: \\n Armed groups refuse to disarm as the pre-conditions for a DDR programme are not in place. \\n Former combatants and\/or persons formerly associated with armed groups return to their communities with weapons, ammunition and\/or explosives, perhaps be- cause of ongoing insecurity or because weapons possession is a cultural practice or tied to notions of power and masculinity. \\n Weapons and ammunition are circulating in communities and pose a security threat, especially where: \\n\\n Civilians, including in certain contexts children, are at-risk of recruitment by armed groups; \\n\\n Civilians, including women, girls, men and boys, are at risk of serious interna- tional crimes, including conflict-related sexual violence. \\n\\n Former combatants and\/or persons formerly associated with armed groups are about to return as part of DDR programmes.", + "Paragraph": "When part of a DDR process, transitional WAM should be considered when there is a need to respond to the presence of active and\/or former members of armed groups. For example, transitional WAM may be appropriate when: \n Armed groups refuse to disarm as the pre-conditions for a DDR programme are not in place. \n Former combatants and\/or persons formerly associated with armed groups return to their communities with weapons, ammunition and\/or explosives, perhaps be- cause of ongoing insecurity or because weapons possession is a cultural practice or tied to notions of power and masculinity. \n Weapons and ammunition are circulating in communities and pose a security threat, especially where: \n\n Civilians, including in certain contexts children, are at-risk of recruitment by armed groups; \n\n Civilians, including women, girls, men and boys, are at risk of serious interna- tional crimes, including conflict-related sexual violence. \n\n Former combatants and\/or persons formerly associated with armed groups are about to return as part of DDR programmes.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -78708,7 +78708,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Former combatants and\/or persons formerly associated with armed groups are about to return as part of DDR programmes.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Former combatants and\/or persons formerly associated with armed groups are about to return as part of DDR programmes.", "newParagraph": "part ddr process transitional wam considered need respond presence active andor former member armed group example transitional wam may appropriate n armed group refuse disarm precondition ddr programme place n former combatant andor person formerly associated armed group return community weapon ammunition andor explosive perhaps cause ongoing insecurity weapon possession cultural practice tied notion power masculinity n weapon ammunition circulating community pose security threat especially nn civilian including certain context child atrisk recruitment armed group nn civilian including woman girl men boy risk serious interna tional crime including conflictrelated sexual violence nn former combatant andor person formerly associated armed group return part ddr programme", "ProcessedSent": "nn former combatant andor person formerly associated armed group return part ddr programme", "SentID": 4372 @@ -78769,7 +78769,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1396, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the generic measures outlined above, in some instances DDR practi- tioners may consider supporting the WAM capacity of armed groups. DDR practition- ers should exercise extreme caution when supporting armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity. While transitional WAM may help to build trust with national and international stake- holders and address some of the immediate risks with regard to the proliferation of weapons, ammunition and explosives, building the WAM capacity of armed groups carries certain risks, and may inadvertently reinforce the fighting capacity of armed groups, legitimize their status, and tarnish the UN\u2019s reputation, all of which could threaten wider DDR objectives. As a result, any decision to support armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity shall consider the following: \\n This approach must align with the broader DDR strategy agreed with and approved by national authorities as an integral part of a peace process or an alter- native conflict resolution strategy. \\n This approach must be in line with the overall UN mission mandate and objec- tives of the UN mission (if a UN mission has been established). \\n Engagement with armed groups shall follow UN policy on this matter, i.e. UN mission policy, including SOPs on engagement with armed groups where they have been adopted, the UN\u2019s Aide Memoire on Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes (see Annex B) and the UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy. \\n This approach shall be informed by risk analysis and be accompanied by risk mitigation measures.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the generic measures outlined above, in some instances DDR practi- tioners may consider supporting the WAM capacity of armed groups. DDR practition- ers should exercise extreme caution when supporting armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity. While transitional WAM may help to build trust with national and international stake- holders and address some of the immediate risks with regard to the proliferation of weapons, ammunition and explosives, building the WAM capacity of armed groups carries certain risks, and may inadvertently reinforce the fighting capacity of armed groups, legitimize their status, and tarnish the UN\u2019s reputation, all of which could threaten wider DDR objectives. As a result, any decision to support armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity shall consider the following: \n This approach must align with the broader DDR strategy agreed with and approved by national authorities as an integral part of a peace process or an alter- native conflict resolution strategy. \n This approach must be in line with the overall UN mission mandate and objec- tives of the UN mission (if a UN mission has been established). \n Engagement with armed groups shall follow UN policy on this matter, i.e. UN mission policy, including SOPs on engagement with armed groups where they have been adopted, the UN\u2019s Aide Memoire on Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes (see Annex B) and the UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy. \n This approach shall be informed by risk analysis and be accompanied by risk mitigation measures.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -78787,7 +78787,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1396, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the generic measures outlined above, in some instances DDR practi- tioners may consider supporting the WAM capacity of armed groups. DDR practition- ers should exercise extreme caution when supporting armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity. While transitional WAM may help to build trust with national and international stake- holders and address some of the immediate risks with regard to the proliferation of weapons, ammunition and explosives, building the WAM capacity of armed groups carries certain risks, and may inadvertently reinforce the fighting capacity of armed groups, legitimize their status, and tarnish the UN\u2019s reputation, all of which could threaten wider DDR objectives. As a result, any decision to support armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity shall consider the following: \\n This approach must align with the broader DDR strategy agreed with and approved by national authorities as an integral part of a peace process or an alter- native conflict resolution strategy. \\n This approach must be in line with the overall UN mission mandate and objec- tives of the UN mission (if a UN mission has been established). \\n Engagement with armed groups shall follow UN policy on this matter, i.e. UN mission policy, including SOPs on engagement with armed groups where they have been adopted, the UN\u2019s Aide Memoire on Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes (see Annex B) and the UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy. \\n This approach shall be informed by risk analysis and be accompanied by risk mitigation measures.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the generic measures outlined above, in some instances DDR practi- tioners may consider supporting the WAM capacity of armed groups. DDR practition- ers should exercise extreme caution when supporting armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity. While transitional WAM may help to build trust with national and international stake- holders and address some of the immediate risks with regard to the proliferation of weapons, ammunition and explosives, building the WAM capacity of armed groups carries certain risks, and may inadvertently reinforce the fighting capacity of armed groups, legitimize their status, and tarnish the UN\u2019s reputation, all of which could threaten wider DDR objectives. As a result, any decision to support armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity shall consider the following: \n This approach must align with the broader DDR strategy agreed with and approved by national authorities as an integral part of a peace process or an alter- native conflict resolution strategy. \n This approach must be in line with the overall UN mission mandate and objec- tives of the UN mission (if a UN mission has been established). \n Engagement with armed groups shall follow UN policy on this matter, i.e. UN mission policy, including SOPs on engagement with armed groups where they have been adopted, the UN\u2019s Aide Memoire on Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes (see Annex B) and the UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy. \n This approach shall be informed by risk analysis and be accompanied by risk mitigation measures.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -78805,7 +78805,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1396, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the generic measures outlined above, in some instances DDR practi- tioners may consider supporting the WAM capacity of armed groups. DDR practition- ers should exercise extreme caution when supporting armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity. While transitional WAM may help to build trust with national and international stake- holders and address some of the immediate risks with regard to the proliferation of weapons, ammunition and explosives, building the WAM capacity of armed groups carries certain risks, and may inadvertently reinforce the fighting capacity of armed groups, legitimize their status, and tarnish the UN\u2019s reputation, all of which could threaten wider DDR objectives. As a result, any decision to support armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity shall consider the following: \\n This approach must align with the broader DDR strategy agreed with and approved by national authorities as an integral part of a peace process or an alter- native conflict resolution strategy. \\n This approach must be in line with the overall UN mission mandate and objec- tives of the UN mission (if a UN mission has been established). \\n Engagement with armed groups shall follow UN policy on this matter, i.e. UN mission policy, including SOPs on engagement with armed groups where they have been adopted, the UN\u2019s Aide Memoire on Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes (see Annex B) and the UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy. \\n This approach shall be informed by risk analysis and be accompanied by risk mitigation measures.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the generic measures outlined above, in some instances DDR practi- tioners may consider supporting the WAM capacity of armed groups. DDR practition- ers should exercise extreme caution when supporting armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity. While transitional WAM may help to build trust with national and international stake- holders and address some of the immediate risks with regard to the proliferation of weapons, ammunition and explosives, building the WAM capacity of armed groups carries certain risks, and may inadvertently reinforce the fighting capacity of armed groups, legitimize their status, and tarnish the UN\u2019s reputation, all of which could threaten wider DDR objectives. As a result, any decision to support armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity shall consider the following: \n This approach must align with the broader DDR strategy agreed with and approved by national authorities as an integral part of a peace process or an alter- native conflict resolution strategy. \n This approach must be in line with the overall UN mission mandate and objec- tives of the UN mission (if a UN mission has been established). \n Engagement with armed groups shall follow UN policy on this matter, i.e. UN mission policy, including SOPs on engagement with armed groups where they have been adopted, the UN\u2019s Aide Memoire on Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes (see Annex B) and the UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy. \n This approach shall be informed by risk analysis and be accompanied by risk mitigation measures.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -78823,7 +78823,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1396, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the generic measures outlined above, in some instances DDR practi- tioners may consider supporting the WAM capacity of armed groups. DDR practition- ers should exercise extreme caution when supporting armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity. While transitional WAM may help to build trust with national and international stake- holders and address some of the immediate risks with regard to the proliferation of weapons, ammunition and explosives, building the WAM capacity of armed groups carries certain risks, and may inadvertently reinforce the fighting capacity of armed groups, legitimize their status, and tarnish the UN\u2019s reputation, all of which could threaten wider DDR objectives. As a result, any decision to support armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity shall consider the following: \\n This approach must align with the broader DDR strategy agreed with and approved by national authorities as an integral part of a peace process or an alter- native conflict resolution strategy. \\n This approach must be in line with the overall UN mission mandate and objec- tives of the UN mission (if a UN mission has been established). \\n Engagement with armed groups shall follow UN policy on this matter, i.e. UN mission policy, including SOPs on engagement with armed groups where they have been adopted, the UN\u2019s Aide Memoire on Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes (see Annex B) and the UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy. \\n This approach shall be informed by risk analysis and be accompanied by risk mitigation measures.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the generic measures outlined above, in some instances DDR practi- tioners may consider supporting the WAM capacity of armed groups. DDR practition- ers should exercise extreme caution when supporting armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity. While transitional WAM may help to build trust with national and international stake- holders and address some of the immediate risks with regard to the proliferation of weapons, ammunition and explosives, building the WAM capacity of armed groups carries certain risks, and may inadvertently reinforce the fighting capacity of armed groups, legitimize their status, and tarnish the UN\u2019s reputation, all of which could threaten wider DDR objectives. As a result, any decision to support armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity shall consider the following: \n This approach must align with the broader DDR strategy agreed with and approved by national authorities as an integral part of a peace process or an alter- native conflict resolution strategy. \n This approach must be in line with the overall UN mission mandate and objec- tives of the UN mission (if a UN mission has been established). \n Engagement with armed groups shall follow UN policy on this matter, i.e. UN mission policy, including SOPs on engagement with armed groups where they have been adopted, the UN\u2019s Aide Memoire on Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes (see Annex B) and the UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy. \n This approach shall be informed by risk analysis and be accompanied by risk mitigation measures.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -78834,14 +78834,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "As a result, any decision to support armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity shall consider the following: \\n This approach must align with the broader DDR strategy agreed with and approved by national authorities as an integral part of a peace process or an alter- native conflict resolution strategy.", + "Sentence": "As a result, any decision to support armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity shall consider the following: \n This approach must align with the broader DDR strategy agreed with and approved by national authorities as an integral part of a peace process or an alter- native conflict resolution strategy.", "newParagraph": "addition generic measure outlined instance ddr practi tioners may consider supporting wam capacity armed group ddr practition er exercise extreme caution supporting armed group wam capacity transitional wam may help build trust national international stake holder address immediate risk regard proliferation weapon ammunition explosive building wam capacity armed group carry certain risk may inadvertently reinforce fighting capacity armed group legitimize status tarnish un reputation could threaten wider ddr objective result decision support armed group wam capacity shall consider following n approach must align broader ddr strategy agreed approved national authority integral part peace process alter native conflict resolution strategy n approach must line overall un mission mandate objec tives un mission un mission established n engagement armed group shall follow un policy matter ie un mission policy including sop engagement armed group adopted un aide memoire engaging nonstate armed group nsags political purpose see annex b un human right due diligence policy n approach shall informed risk analysis accompanied risk mitigation measure", "ProcessedSent": "result decision support armed group wam capacity shall consider following n approach must align broader ddr strategy agreed approved national authority integral part peace process alter native conflict resolution strategy", "SentID": 4379 }, { "ParagraphID": 1396, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the generic measures outlined above, in some instances DDR practi- tioners may consider supporting the WAM capacity of armed groups. DDR practition- ers should exercise extreme caution when supporting armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity. While transitional WAM may help to build trust with national and international stake- holders and address some of the immediate risks with regard to the proliferation of weapons, ammunition and explosives, building the WAM capacity of armed groups carries certain risks, and may inadvertently reinforce the fighting capacity of armed groups, legitimize their status, and tarnish the UN\u2019s reputation, all of which could threaten wider DDR objectives. As a result, any decision to support armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity shall consider the following: \\n This approach must align with the broader DDR strategy agreed with and approved by national authorities as an integral part of a peace process or an alter- native conflict resolution strategy. \\n This approach must be in line with the overall UN mission mandate and objec- tives of the UN mission (if a UN mission has been established). \\n Engagement with armed groups shall follow UN policy on this matter, i.e. UN mission policy, including SOPs on engagement with armed groups where they have been adopted, the UN\u2019s Aide Memoire on Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes (see Annex B) and the UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy. \\n This approach shall be informed by risk analysis and be accompanied by risk mitigation measures.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the generic measures outlined above, in some instances DDR practi- tioners may consider supporting the WAM capacity of armed groups. DDR practition- ers should exercise extreme caution when supporting armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity. While transitional WAM may help to build trust with national and international stake- holders and address some of the immediate risks with regard to the proliferation of weapons, ammunition and explosives, building the WAM capacity of armed groups carries certain risks, and may inadvertently reinforce the fighting capacity of armed groups, legitimize their status, and tarnish the UN\u2019s reputation, all of which could threaten wider DDR objectives. As a result, any decision to support armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity shall consider the following: \n This approach must align with the broader DDR strategy agreed with and approved by national authorities as an integral part of a peace process or an alter- native conflict resolution strategy. \n This approach must be in line with the overall UN mission mandate and objec- tives of the UN mission (if a UN mission has been established). \n Engagement with armed groups shall follow UN policy on this matter, i.e. UN mission policy, including SOPs on engagement with armed groups where they have been adopted, the UN\u2019s Aide Memoire on Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes (see Annex B) and the UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy. \n This approach shall be informed by risk analysis and be accompanied by risk mitigation measures.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -78852,14 +78852,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n This approach must be in line with the overall UN mission mandate and objec- tives of the UN mission (if a UN mission has been established).", + "Sentence": "\n This approach must be in line with the overall UN mission mandate and objec- tives of the UN mission (if a UN mission has been established).", "newParagraph": "addition generic measure outlined instance ddr practi tioners may consider supporting wam capacity armed group ddr practition er exercise extreme caution supporting armed group wam capacity transitional wam may help build trust national international stake holder address immediate risk regard proliferation weapon ammunition explosive building wam capacity armed group carry certain risk may inadvertently reinforce fighting capacity armed group legitimize status tarnish un reputation could threaten wider ddr objective result decision support armed group wam capacity shall consider following n approach must align broader ddr strategy agreed approved national authority integral part peace process alter native conflict resolution strategy n approach must line overall un mission mandate objec tives un mission un mission established n engagement armed group shall follow un policy matter ie un mission policy including sop engagement armed group adopted un aide memoire engaging nonstate armed group nsags political purpose see annex b un human right due diligence policy n approach shall informed risk analysis accompanied risk mitigation measure", "ProcessedSent": "n approach must line overall un mission mandate objec tives un mission un mission established", "SentID": 4380 }, { "ParagraphID": 1396, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the generic measures outlined above, in some instances DDR practi- tioners may consider supporting the WAM capacity of armed groups. DDR practition- ers should exercise extreme caution when supporting armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity. While transitional WAM may help to build trust with national and international stake- holders and address some of the immediate risks with regard to the proliferation of weapons, ammunition and explosives, building the WAM capacity of armed groups carries certain risks, and may inadvertently reinforce the fighting capacity of armed groups, legitimize their status, and tarnish the UN\u2019s reputation, all of which could threaten wider DDR objectives. As a result, any decision to support armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity shall consider the following: \\n This approach must align with the broader DDR strategy agreed with and approved by national authorities as an integral part of a peace process or an alter- native conflict resolution strategy. \\n This approach must be in line with the overall UN mission mandate and objec- tives of the UN mission (if a UN mission has been established). \\n Engagement with armed groups shall follow UN policy on this matter, i.e. UN mission policy, including SOPs on engagement with armed groups where they have been adopted, the UN\u2019s Aide Memoire on Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes (see Annex B) and the UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy. \\n This approach shall be informed by risk analysis and be accompanied by risk mitigation measures.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the generic measures outlined above, in some instances DDR practi- tioners may consider supporting the WAM capacity of armed groups. DDR practition- ers should exercise extreme caution when supporting armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity. While transitional WAM may help to build trust with national and international stake- holders and address some of the immediate risks with regard to the proliferation of weapons, ammunition and explosives, building the WAM capacity of armed groups carries certain risks, and may inadvertently reinforce the fighting capacity of armed groups, legitimize their status, and tarnish the UN\u2019s reputation, all of which could threaten wider DDR objectives. As a result, any decision to support armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity shall consider the following: \n This approach must align with the broader DDR strategy agreed with and approved by national authorities as an integral part of a peace process or an alter- native conflict resolution strategy. \n This approach must be in line with the overall UN mission mandate and objec- tives of the UN mission (if a UN mission has been established). \n Engagement with armed groups shall follow UN policy on this matter, i.e. UN mission policy, including SOPs on engagement with armed groups where they have been adopted, the UN\u2019s Aide Memoire on Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes (see Annex B) and the UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy. \n This approach shall be informed by risk analysis and be accompanied by risk mitigation measures.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -78870,14 +78870,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Engagement with armed groups shall follow UN policy on this matter, i.e.", + "Sentence": "\n Engagement with armed groups shall follow UN policy on this matter, i.e.", "newParagraph": "addition generic measure outlined instance ddr practi tioners may consider supporting wam capacity armed group ddr practition er exercise extreme caution supporting armed group wam capacity transitional wam may help build trust national international stake holder address immediate risk regard proliferation weapon ammunition explosive building wam capacity armed group carry certain risk may inadvertently reinforce fighting capacity armed group legitimize status tarnish un reputation could threaten wider ddr objective result decision support armed group wam capacity shall consider following n approach must align broader ddr strategy agreed approved national authority integral part peace process alter native conflict resolution strategy n approach must line overall un mission mandate objec tives un mission un mission established n engagement armed group shall follow un policy matter ie un mission policy including sop engagement armed group adopted un aide memoire engaging nonstate armed group nsags political purpose see annex b un human right due diligence policy n approach shall informed risk analysis accompanied risk mitigation measure", "ProcessedSent": "n engagement armed group shall follow un policy matter ie", "SentID": 4381 }, { "ParagraphID": 1396, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the generic measures outlined above, in some instances DDR practi- tioners may consider supporting the WAM capacity of armed groups. DDR practition- ers should exercise extreme caution when supporting armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity. While transitional WAM may help to build trust with national and international stake- holders and address some of the immediate risks with regard to the proliferation of weapons, ammunition and explosives, building the WAM capacity of armed groups carries certain risks, and may inadvertently reinforce the fighting capacity of armed groups, legitimize their status, and tarnish the UN\u2019s reputation, all of which could threaten wider DDR objectives. As a result, any decision to support armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity shall consider the following: \\n This approach must align with the broader DDR strategy agreed with and approved by national authorities as an integral part of a peace process or an alter- native conflict resolution strategy. \\n This approach must be in line with the overall UN mission mandate and objec- tives of the UN mission (if a UN mission has been established). \\n Engagement with armed groups shall follow UN policy on this matter, i.e. UN mission policy, including SOPs on engagement with armed groups where they have been adopted, the UN\u2019s Aide Memoire on Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes (see Annex B) and the UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy. \\n This approach shall be informed by risk analysis and be accompanied by risk mitigation measures.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the generic measures outlined above, in some instances DDR practi- tioners may consider supporting the WAM capacity of armed groups. DDR practition- ers should exercise extreme caution when supporting armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity. While transitional WAM may help to build trust with national and international stake- holders and address some of the immediate risks with regard to the proliferation of weapons, ammunition and explosives, building the WAM capacity of armed groups carries certain risks, and may inadvertently reinforce the fighting capacity of armed groups, legitimize their status, and tarnish the UN\u2019s reputation, all of which could threaten wider DDR objectives. As a result, any decision to support armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity shall consider the following: \n This approach must align with the broader DDR strategy agreed with and approved by national authorities as an integral part of a peace process or an alter- native conflict resolution strategy. \n This approach must be in line with the overall UN mission mandate and objec- tives of the UN mission (if a UN mission has been established). \n Engagement with armed groups shall follow UN policy on this matter, i.e. UN mission policy, including SOPs on engagement with armed groups where they have been adopted, the UN\u2019s Aide Memoire on Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes (see Annex B) and the UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy. \n This approach shall be informed by risk analysis and be accompanied by risk mitigation measures.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -78895,7 +78895,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1396, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the generic measures outlined above, in some instances DDR practi- tioners may consider supporting the WAM capacity of armed groups. DDR practition- ers should exercise extreme caution when supporting armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity. While transitional WAM may help to build trust with national and international stake- holders and address some of the immediate risks with regard to the proliferation of weapons, ammunition and explosives, building the WAM capacity of armed groups carries certain risks, and may inadvertently reinforce the fighting capacity of armed groups, legitimize their status, and tarnish the UN\u2019s reputation, all of which could threaten wider DDR objectives. As a result, any decision to support armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity shall consider the following: \\n This approach must align with the broader DDR strategy agreed with and approved by national authorities as an integral part of a peace process or an alter- native conflict resolution strategy. \\n This approach must be in line with the overall UN mission mandate and objec- tives of the UN mission (if a UN mission has been established). \\n Engagement with armed groups shall follow UN policy on this matter, i.e. UN mission policy, including SOPs on engagement with armed groups where they have been adopted, the UN\u2019s Aide Memoire on Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes (see Annex B) and the UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy. \\n This approach shall be informed by risk analysis and be accompanied by risk mitigation measures.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the generic measures outlined above, in some instances DDR practi- tioners may consider supporting the WAM capacity of armed groups. DDR practition- ers should exercise extreme caution when supporting armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity. While transitional WAM may help to build trust with national and international stake- holders and address some of the immediate risks with regard to the proliferation of weapons, ammunition and explosives, building the WAM capacity of armed groups carries certain risks, and may inadvertently reinforce the fighting capacity of armed groups, legitimize their status, and tarnish the UN\u2019s reputation, all of which could threaten wider DDR objectives. As a result, any decision to support armed groups\u2019 WAM capacity shall consider the following: \n This approach must align with the broader DDR strategy agreed with and approved by national authorities as an integral part of a peace process or an alter- native conflict resolution strategy. \n This approach must be in line with the overall UN mission mandate and objec- tives of the UN mission (if a UN mission has been established). \n Engagement with armed groups shall follow UN policy on this matter, i.e. UN mission policy, including SOPs on engagement with armed groups where they have been adopted, the UN\u2019s Aide Memoire on Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes (see Annex B) and the UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy. \n This approach shall be informed by risk analysis and be accompanied by risk mitigation measures.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -78906,7 +78906,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n This approach shall be informed by risk analysis and be accompanied by risk mitigation measures.", + "Sentence": "\n This approach shall be informed by risk analysis and be accompanied by risk mitigation measures.", "newParagraph": "addition generic measure outlined instance ddr practi tioners may consider supporting wam capacity armed group ddr practition er exercise extreme caution supporting armed group wam capacity transitional wam may help build trust national international stake holder address immediate risk regard proliferation weapon ammunition explosive building wam capacity armed group carry certain risk may inadvertently reinforce fighting capacity armed group legitimize status tarnish un reputation could threaten wider ddr objective result decision support armed group wam capacity shall consider following n approach must align broader ddr strategy agreed approved national authority integral part peace process alter native conflict resolution strategy n approach must line overall un mission mandate objec tives un mission un mission established n engagement armed group shall follow un policy matter ie un mission policy including sop engagement armed group adopted un aide memoire engaging nonstate armed group nsags political purpose see annex b un human right due diligence policy n approach shall informed risk analysis accompanied risk mitigation measure", "ProcessedSent": "n approach shall informed risk analysis accompanied risk mitigation measure", "SentID": 4383 @@ -79075,7 +79075,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1402, - "Paragraph": "Pre-disarmament involves collecting, registering and storing materiel in a safe loca- tion. Depending on the context and agreements in place with armed forces and groups, pre-disarmament could focus on certain types of materiel, including larger crew- operated systems in contexts where warring parties are very well equipped. Hand- overs can be: \\n Temporary: Materiel is registered and stored properly but remains under the joint control of armed forces, armed groups and the United Nations through a dual-key system with well established roles and procedures; \\n Permanent: Materiel is handed over, registered and ultimately disposed of (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \\n\\n In both cases, unsafe ammunition shall be destroyed, and all activities must be carried out in full transparency and with respect of safety and security procedures during the destruction process.", + "Paragraph": "Pre-disarmament involves collecting, registering and storing materiel in a safe loca- tion. Depending on the context and agreements in place with armed forces and groups, pre-disarmament could focus on certain types of materiel, including larger crew- operated systems in contexts where warring parties are very well equipped. Hand- overs can be: \n Temporary: Materiel is registered and stored properly but remains under the joint control of armed forces, armed groups and the United Nations through a dual-key system with well established roles and procedures; \n Permanent: Materiel is handed over, registered and ultimately disposed of (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \n\n In both cases, unsafe ammunition shall be destroyed, and all activities must be carried out in full transparency and with respect of safety and security procedures during the destruction process.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -79093,7 +79093,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1402, - "Paragraph": "Pre-disarmament involves collecting, registering and storing materiel in a safe loca- tion. Depending on the context and agreements in place with armed forces and groups, pre-disarmament could focus on certain types of materiel, including larger crew- operated systems in contexts where warring parties are very well equipped. Hand- overs can be: \\n Temporary: Materiel is registered and stored properly but remains under the joint control of armed forces, armed groups and the United Nations through a dual-key system with well established roles and procedures; \\n Permanent: Materiel is handed over, registered and ultimately disposed of (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \\n\\n In both cases, unsafe ammunition shall be destroyed, and all activities must be carried out in full transparency and with respect of safety and security procedures during the destruction process.", + "Paragraph": "Pre-disarmament involves collecting, registering and storing materiel in a safe loca- tion. Depending on the context and agreements in place with armed forces and groups, pre-disarmament could focus on certain types of materiel, including larger crew- operated systems in contexts where warring parties are very well equipped. Hand- overs can be: \n Temporary: Materiel is registered and stored properly but remains under the joint control of armed forces, armed groups and the United Nations through a dual-key system with well established roles and procedures; \n Permanent: Materiel is handed over, registered and ultimately disposed of (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \n\n In both cases, unsafe ammunition shall be destroyed, and all activities must be carried out in full transparency and with respect of safety and security procedures during the destruction process.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -79111,7 +79111,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1402, - "Paragraph": "Pre-disarmament involves collecting, registering and storing materiel in a safe loca- tion. Depending on the context and agreements in place with armed forces and groups, pre-disarmament could focus on certain types of materiel, including larger crew- operated systems in contexts where warring parties are very well equipped. Hand- overs can be: \\n Temporary: Materiel is registered and stored properly but remains under the joint control of armed forces, armed groups and the United Nations through a dual-key system with well established roles and procedures; \\n Permanent: Materiel is handed over, registered and ultimately disposed of (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \\n\\n In both cases, unsafe ammunition shall be destroyed, and all activities must be carried out in full transparency and with respect of safety and security procedures during the destruction process.", + "Paragraph": "Pre-disarmament involves collecting, registering and storing materiel in a safe loca- tion. Depending on the context and agreements in place with armed forces and groups, pre-disarmament could focus on certain types of materiel, including larger crew- operated systems in contexts where warring parties are very well equipped. Hand- overs can be: \n Temporary: Materiel is registered and stored properly but remains under the joint control of armed forces, armed groups and the United Nations through a dual-key system with well established roles and procedures; \n Permanent: Materiel is handed over, registered and ultimately disposed of (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \n\n In both cases, unsafe ammunition shall be destroyed, and all activities must be carried out in full transparency and with respect of safety and security procedures during the destruction process.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -79122,14 +79122,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Transitional WAM in support of DDR-related tools", "Heading3": "6.1.2 Pre-DDR and transitional WAM", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Hand- overs can be: \\n Temporary: Materiel is registered and stored properly but remains under the joint control of armed forces, armed groups and the United Nations through a dual-key system with well established roles and procedures; \\n Permanent: Materiel is handed over, registered and ultimately disposed of (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament).", + "Sentence": "Hand- overs can be: \n Temporary: Materiel is registered and stored properly but remains under the joint control of armed forces, armed groups and the United Nations through a dual-key system with well established roles and procedures; \n Permanent: Materiel is handed over, registered and ultimately disposed of (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament).", "newParagraph": "predisarmament involves collecting registering storing materiel safe loca tion depending context agreement place armed force group predisarmament could focus certain type materiel including larger crew operated system context warring party well equipped hand over n temporary materiel registered stored properly remains joint control armed force armed group united nation dualkey system well established role procedure n permanent materiel handed registered ultimately disposed see iddrs 410 disarmament nn case unsafe ammunition shall destroyed activity must carried full transparency respect safety security procedure destruction process", "ProcessedSent": "hand over n temporary materiel registered stored properly remains joint control armed force armed group united nation dualkey system well established role procedure n permanent materiel handed registered ultimately disposed see iddrs 410 disarmament", "SentID": 4395 }, { "ParagraphID": 1402, - "Paragraph": "Pre-disarmament involves collecting, registering and storing materiel in a safe loca- tion. Depending on the context and agreements in place with armed forces and groups, pre-disarmament could focus on certain types of materiel, including larger crew- operated systems in contexts where warring parties are very well equipped. Hand- overs can be: \\n Temporary: Materiel is registered and stored properly but remains under the joint control of armed forces, armed groups and the United Nations through a dual-key system with well established roles and procedures; \\n Permanent: Materiel is handed over, registered and ultimately disposed of (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \\n\\n In both cases, unsafe ammunition shall be destroyed, and all activities must be carried out in full transparency and with respect of safety and security procedures during the destruction process.", + "Paragraph": "Pre-disarmament involves collecting, registering and storing materiel in a safe loca- tion. Depending on the context and agreements in place with armed forces and groups, pre-disarmament could focus on certain types of materiel, including larger crew- operated systems in contexts where warring parties are very well equipped. Hand- overs can be: \n Temporary: Materiel is registered and stored properly but remains under the joint control of armed forces, armed groups and the United Nations through a dual-key system with well established roles and procedures; \n Permanent: Materiel is handed over, registered and ultimately disposed of (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \n\n In both cases, unsafe ammunition shall be destroyed, and all activities must be carried out in full transparency and with respect of safety and security procedures during the destruction process.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -79140,14 +79140,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Transitional WAM in support of DDR-related tools", "Heading3": "6.1.2 Pre-DDR and transitional WAM", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n In both cases, unsafe ammunition shall be destroyed, and all activities must be carried out in full transparency and with respect of safety and security procedures during the destruction process.", + "Sentence": "\n\n In both cases, unsafe ammunition shall be destroyed, and all activities must be carried out in full transparency and with respect of safety and security procedures during the destruction process.", "newParagraph": "predisarmament involves collecting registering storing materiel safe loca tion depending context agreement place armed force group predisarmament could focus certain type materiel including larger crew operated system context warring party well equipped hand over n temporary materiel registered stored properly remains joint control armed force armed group united nation dualkey system well established role procedure n permanent materiel handed registered ultimately disposed see iddrs 410 disarmament nn case unsafe ammunition shall destroyed activity must carried full transparency respect safety security procedure destruction process", "ProcessedSent": "nn case unsafe ammunition shall destroyed activity must carried full transparency respect safety security procedure destruction process", "SentID": 4396 }, { "ParagraphID": 1403, - "Paragraph": "Pre-disarmament should: \\n Build and strengthen the confidence of armed forces, armed groups and the civilian population in any future disarmament process and the wider DDR programme; \\n Reduce the circulation and visibility of weapons and ammunition; \\n Contribute to improved perceptions of peace and security; \\n Raise awareness about the dangers of illicit weapons and ammunition; \\n Build knowledge of armed groups\u2019 arsenals; \\n Allow DDR practitioners to identify and mitigate risks that may arise during the disarmament component of the future DDR programme, including through the planning and conduct of operational tests (see section 5.3 in IDDRS 4.10 on Disar- mament); \\n Encourage members of armed groups to voluntarily disarm and engage in a full DDR programme.", + "Paragraph": "Pre-disarmament should: \n Build and strengthen the confidence of armed forces, armed groups and the civilian population in any future disarmament process and the wider DDR programme; \n Reduce the circulation and visibility of weapons and ammunition; \n Contribute to improved perceptions of peace and security; \n Raise awareness about the dangers of illicit weapons and ammunition; \n Build knowledge of armed groups\u2019 arsenals; \n Allow DDR practitioners to identify and mitigate risks that may arise during the disarmament component of the future DDR programme, including through the planning and conduct of operational tests (see section 5.3 in IDDRS 4.10 on Disar- mament); \n Encourage members of armed groups to voluntarily disarm and engage in a full DDR programme.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -79158,7 +79158,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Transitional WAM in support of DDR-related tools", "Heading3": "6.1.2 Pre-DDR and transitional WAM", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Pre-disarmament should: \\n Build and strengthen the confidence of armed forces, armed groups and the civilian population in any future disarmament process and the wider DDR programme; \\n Reduce the circulation and visibility of weapons and ammunition; \\n Contribute to improved perceptions of peace and security; \\n Raise awareness about the dangers of illicit weapons and ammunition; \\n Build knowledge of armed groups\u2019 arsenals; \\n Allow DDR practitioners to identify and mitigate risks that may arise during the disarmament component of the future DDR programme, including through the planning and conduct of operational tests (see section 5.3 in IDDRS 4.10 on Disar- mament); \\n Encourage members of armed groups to voluntarily disarm and engage in a full DDR programme.", + "Sentence": "Pre-disarmament should: \n Build and strengthen the confidence of armed forces, armed groups and the civilian population in any future disarmament process and the wider DDR programme; \n Reduce the circulation and visibility of weapons and ammunition; \n Contribute to improved perceptions of peace and security; \n Raise awareness about the dangers of illicit weapons and ammunition; \n Build knowledge of armed groups\u2019 arsenals; \n Allow DDR practitioners to identify and mitigate risks that may arise during the disarmament component of the future DDR programme, including through the planning and conduct of operational tests (see section 5.3 in IDDRS 4.10 on Disar- mament); \n Encourage members of armed groups to voluntarily disarm and engage in a full DDR programme.", "newParagraph": "predisarmament n build strengthen confidence armed force armed group civilian population future disarmament process wider ddr programme n reduce circulation visibility weapon ammunition n contribute improved perception peace security n raise awareness danger illicit weapon ammunition n build knowledge armed group arsenal n allow ddr practitioner identify mitigate risk may arise disarmament component future ddr programme including planning conduct operational test see section 53 iddrs 410 disar mament n encourage member armed group voluntarily disarm engage full ddr programme", "ProcessedSent": "predisarmament n build strengthen confidence armed force armed group civilian population future disarmament process wider ddr programme n reduce circulation visibility weapon ammunition n contribute improved perception peace security n raise awareness danger illicit weapon ammunition n build knowledge armed group arsenal n allow ddr practitioner identify mitigate risk may arise disarmament component future ddr programme including planning conduct operational test see section 53 iddrs 410 disar mament n encourage member armed group voluntarily disarm engage full ddr programme", "SentID": 4397 @@ -79669,7 +79669,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1411, - "Paragraph": "The term \u2018SALW control\u2019 refers to those activities that together aim to reduce the security, social, economic and environmental impact of uncontrolled SALW proliferation, possession and circulation. These activities largely consist of, but are not limited to: \\n Cross-border control measures; \\n Information management and exchange; \\n Legislative and regulatory measures; \\n SALW awareness and outreach strategies; \\n SALW surveys and assessments; \\n SALW collection and registration, including utilization of relevant regional and international databases for cross-checking \\n SALW destruction; \\n Stockpile management; \\n Marking, recordkeeping and tracing.", + "Paragraph": "The term \u2018SALW control\u2019 refers to those activities that together aim to reduce the security, social, economic and environmental impact of uncontrolled SALW proliferation, possession and circulation. These activities largely consist of, but are not limited to: \n Cross-border control measures; \n Information management and exchange; \n Legislative and regulatory measures; \n SALW awareness and outreach strategies; \n SALW surveys and assessments; \n SALW collection and registration, including utilization of relevant regional and international databases for cross-checking \n SALW destruction; \n Stockpile management; \n Marking, recordkeeping and tracing.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -79687,7 +79687,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1411, - "Paragraph": "The term \u2018SALW control\u2019 refers to those activities that together aim to reduce the security, social, economic and environmental impact of uncontrolled SALW proliferation, possession and circulation. These activities largely consist of, but are not limited to: \\n Cross-border control measures; \\n Information management and exchange; \\n Legislative and regulatory measures; \\n SALW awareness and outreach strategies; \\n SALW surveys and assessments; \\n SALW collection and registration, including utilization of relevant regional and international databases for cross-checking \\n SALW destruction; \\n Stockpile management; \\n Marking, recordkeeping and tracing.", + "Paragraph": "The term \u2018SALW control\u2019 refers to those activities that together aim to reduce the security, social, economic and environmental impact of uncontrolled SALW proliferation, possession and circulation. These activities largely consist of, but are not limited to: \n Cross-border control measures; \n Information management and exchange; \n Legislative and regulatory measures; \n SALW awareness and outreach strategies; \n SALW surveys and assessments; \n SALW collection and registration, including utilization of relevant regional and international databases for cross-checking \n SALW destruction; \n Stockpile management; \n Marking, recordkeeping and tracing.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -79698,7 +79698,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "These activities largely consist of, but are not limited to: \\n Cross-border control measures; \\n Information management and exchange; \\n Legislative and regulatory measures; \\n SALW awareness and outreach strategies; \\n SALW surveys and assessments; \\n SALW collection and registration, including utilization of relevant regional and international databases for cross-checking \\n SALW destruction; \\n Stockpile management; \\n Marking, recordkeeping and tracing.", + "Sentence": "These activities largely consist of, but are not limited to: \n Cross-border control measures; \n Information management and exchange; \n Legislative and regulatory measures; \n SALW awareness and outreach strategies; \n SALW surveys and assessments; \n SALW collection and registration, including utilization of relevant regional and international databases for cross-checking \n SALW destruction; \n Stockpile management; \n Marking, recordkeeping and tracing.", "newParagraph": "term salw control refers activity together aim reduce security social economic environmental impact uncontrolled salw proliferation possession circulation activity largely consist limited n crossborder control measure n information management exchange n legislative regulatory measure n salw awareness outreach strategy n salw survey assessment n salw collection registration including utilization relevant regional international database crosschecking n salw destruction n stockpile management n marking recordkeeping tracing", "ProcessedSent": "activity largely consist limited n crossborder control measure n information management exchange n legislative regulatory measure n salw awareness outreach strategy n salw survey assessment n salw collection registration including utilization relevant regional international database crosschecking n salw destruction n stockpile management n marking recordkeeping tracing", "SentID": 4427 @@ -79993,7 +79993,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1416, - "Paragraph": "The following normative documents (i.e., documents containing applicable norms, standards and guidelines) contain provisions that apply to the processes dealt with in this module. \\n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines. \\n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019. \\n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \\n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols. \\n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf. \\n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017. \\n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War? The Gender Dimensions of Violence in DDR, 2012. \\n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs. Effective Weapons and Ammunition Management in a Changing Disarma- ment, Demobilization and Reintegration Context. Handbook for United Nations DDR practitioners. 2018. Referred as \u2018DDR WAM Handbook\u2019 in this standard. \\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf. \\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", + "Paragraph": "The following normative documents (i.e., documents containing applicable norms, standards and guidelines) contain provisions that apply to the processes dealt with in this module. \n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines. \n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019. \n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols. \n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf. \n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017. \n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War? The Gender Dimensions of Violence in DDR, 2012. \n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs. Effective Weapons and Ammunition Management in a Changing Disarma- ment, Demobilization and Reintegration Context. Handbook for United Nations DDR practitioners. 2018. Referred as \u2018DDR WAM Handbook\u2019 in this standard. \n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf. \n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -80011,7 +80011,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1416, - "Paragraph": "The following normative documents (i.e., documents containing applicable norms, standards and guidelines) contain provisions that apply to the processes dealt with in this module. \\n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines. \\n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019. \\n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \\n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols. \\n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf. \\n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017. \\n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War? The Gender Dimensions of Violence in DDR, 2012. \\n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs. Effective Weapons and Ammunition Management in a Changing Disarma- ment, Demobilization and Reintegration Context. Handbook for United Nations DDR practitioners. 2018. Referred as \u2018DDR WAM Handbook\u2019 in this standard. \\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf. \\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", + "Paragraph": "The following normative documents (i.e., documents containing applicable norms, standards and guidelines) contain provisions that apply to the processes dealt with in this module. \n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines. \n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019. \n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols. \n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf. \n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017. \n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War? The Gender Dimensions of Violence in DDR, 2012. \n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs. Effective Weapons and Ammunition Management in a Changing Disarma- ment, Demobilization and Reintegration Context. Handbook for United Nations DDR practitioners. 2018. Referred as \u2018DDR WAM Handbook\u2019 in this standard. \n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf. \n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -80022,14 +80022,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines.", + "Sentence": "\n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines.", "newParagraph": "following normative document ie document containing applicable norm standard guideline contain provision apply process dealt module n international ammunition technical guideline httpswwwunorgdisarmament unsaferguardguidelines n international standard organization iso guide 51 safety aspect guideline inclusion standard n modular smallarmscontrol implementation compendium httpswwwunorg disarmamentconvarmsmosaic n small arm survey south eastern eastern europe clearinghouse control small arm seesac salw survey protocol httpwwwseesacorg surveyprotocols n weapon ammunition management policy united nation department operational support department peace operation department political peacebuilding affair department safety security 2019 httpdagunorg bitstreamhandle11176400906weapons20and20ammunition20policypdf n un department political affair un department peacekeeping operation aide memoire engaging nonstate armed group nsags political purpose consideration un mediator mission 2017 n un development programme blame war gender dimension violence ddr 2012 n un department peacekeeping operation un office disarmament af fair effective weapon ammunition management changing disarma ment demobilization reintegration context handbook united nation ddr practitioner 2018 referred ddr wam handbook standard n un institute disarmament research utilizing international ammunition tech nical guideline conflictaffected lowcapacity environment 2019 http wwwunidirorgfilespublicationspdfsutilizingtheinternationalammunitiontech nicalguidelinesinconflictaffectedandlowcapacityenvironmentsen749pdf n un institute disarmament research role weapon ammunition management preventing conflict supporting security transition 2019 httpswwwunidirorgpublicationroleweaponandammunitionmanage mentpreventingconflictandsupportingsecurity", "ProcessedSent": "n international ammunition technical guideline httpswwwunorgdisarmament unsaferguardguidelines", "SentID": 4445 }, { "ParagraphID": 1416, - "Paragraph": "The following normative documents (i.e., documents containing applicable norms, standards and guidelines) contain provisions that apply to the processes dealt with in this module. \\n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines. \\n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019. \\n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \\n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols. \\n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf. \\n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017. \\n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War? The Gender Dimensions of Violence in DDR, 2012. \\n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs. Effective Weapons and Ammunition Management in a Changing Disarma- ment, Demobilization and Reintegration Context. Handbook for United Nations DDR practitioners. 2018. Referred as \u2018DDR WAM Handbook\u2019 in this standard. \\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf. \\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", + "Paragraph": "The following normative documents (i.e., documents containing applicable norms, standards and guidelines) contain provisions that apply to the processes dealt with in this module. \n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines. \n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019. \n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols. \n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf. \n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017. \n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War? The Gender Dimensions of Violence in DDR, 2012. \n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs. Effective Weapons and Ammunition Management in a Changing Disarma- ment, Demobilization and Reintegration Context. Handbook for United Nations DDR practitioners. 2018. Referred as \u2018DDR WAM Handbook\u2019 in this standard. \n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf. \n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -80040,14 +80040,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019.", + "Sentence": "\n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019.", "newParagraph": "following normative document ie document containing applicable norm standard guideline contain provision apply process dealt module n international ammunition technical guideline httpswwwunorgdisarmament unsaferguardguidelines n international standard organization iso guide 51 safety aspect guideline inclusion standard n modular smallarmscontrol implementation compendium httpswwwunorg disarmamentconvarmsmosaic n small arm survey south eastern eastern europe clearinghouse control small arm seesac salw survey protocol httpwwwseesacorg surveyprotocols n weapon ammunition management policy united nation department operational support department peace operation department political peacebuilding affair department safety security 2019 httpdagunorg bitstreamhandle11176400906weapons20and20ammunition20policypdf n un department political affair un department peacekeeping operation aide memoire engaging nonstate armed group nsags political purpose consideration un mediator mission 2017 n un development programme blame war gender dimension violence ddr 2012 n un department peacekeeping operation un office disarmament af fair effective weapon ammunition management changing disarma ment demobilization reintegration context handbook united nation ddr practitioner 2018 referred ddr wam handbook standard n un institute disarmament research utilizing international ammunition tech nical guideline conflictaffected lowcapacity environment 2019 http wwwunidirorgfilespublicationspdfsutilizingtheinternationalammunitiontech nicalguidelinesinconflictaffectedandlowcapacityenvironmentsen749pdf n un institute disarmament research role weapon ammunition management preventing conflict supporting security transition 2019 httpswwwunidirorgpublicationroleweaponandammunitionmanage mentpreventingconflictandsupportingsecurity", "ProcessedSent": "n international standard organization iso guide 51 safety aspect guideline inclusion standard ", "SentID": 4446 }, { "ParagraphID": 1416, - "Paragraph": "The following normative documents (i.e., documents containing applicable norms, standards and guidelines) contain provisions that apply to the processes dealt with in this module. \\n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines. \\n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019. \\n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \\n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols. \\n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf. \\n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017. \\n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War? The Gender Dimensions of Violence in DDR, 2012. \\n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs. Effective Weapons and Ammunition Management in a Changing Disarma- ment, Demobilization and Reintegration Context. Handbook for United Nations DDR practitioners. 2018. Referred as \u2018DDR WAM Handbook\u2019 in this standard. \\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf. \\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", + "Paragraph": "The following normative documents (i.e., documents containing applicable norms, standards and guidelines) contain provisions that apply to the processes dealt with in this module. \n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines. \n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019. \n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols. \n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf. \n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017. \n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War? The Gender Dimensions of Violence in DDR, 2012. \n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs. Effective Weapons and Ammunition Management in a Changing Disarma- ment, Demobilization and Reintegration Context. Handbook for United Nations DDR practitioners. 2018. Referred as \u2018DDR WAM Handbook\u2019 in this standard. \n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf. \n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -80058,14 +80058,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic.", + "Sentence": "\n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic.", "newParagraph": "following normative document ie document containing applicable norm standard guideline contain provision apply process dealt module n international ammunition technical guideline httpswwwunorgdisarmament unsaferguardguidelines n international standard organization iso guide 51 safety aspect guideline inclusion standard n modular smallarmscontrol implementation compendium httpswwwunorg disarmamentconvarmsmosaic n small arm survey south eastern eastern europe clearinghouse control small arm seesac salw survey protocol httpwwwseesacorg surveyprotocols n weapon ammunition management policy united nation department operational support department peace operation department political peacebuilding affair department safety security 2019 httpdagunorg bitstreamhandle11176400906weapons20and20ammunition20policypdf n un department political affair un department peacekeeping operation aide memoire engaging nonstate armed group nsags political purpose consideration un mediator mission 2017 n un development programme blame war gender dimension violence ddr 2012 n un department peacekeeping operation un office disarmament af fair effective weapon ammunition management changing disarma ment demobilization reintegration context handbook united nation ddr practitioner 2018 referred ddr wam handbook standard n un institute disarmament research utilizing international ammunition tech nical guideline conflictaffected lowcapacity environment 2019 http wwwunidirorgfilespublicationspdfsutilizingtheinternationalammunitiontech nicalguidelinesinconflictaffectedandlowcapacityenvironmentsen749pdf n un institute disarmament research role weapon ammunition management preventing conflict supporting security transition 2019 httpswwwunidirorgpublicationroleweaponandammunitionmanage mentpreventingconflictandsupportingsecurity", "ProcessedSent": "n modular smallarmscontrol implementation compendium httpswwwunorg disarmamentconvarmsmosaic", "SentID": 4447 }, { "ParagraphID": 1416, - "Paragraph": "The following normative documents (i.e., documents containing applicable norms, standards and guidelines) contain provisions that apply to the processes dealt with in this module. \\n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines. \\n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019. \\n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \\n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols. \\n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf. \\n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017. \\n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War? The Gender Dimensions of Violence in DDR, 2012. \\n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs. Effective Weapons and Ammunition Management in a Changing Disarma- ment, Demobilization and Reintegration Context. Handbook for United Nations DDR practitioners. 2018. Referred as \u2018DDR WAM Handbook\u2019 in this standard. \\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf. \\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", + "Paragraph": "The following normative documents (i.e., documents containing applicable norms, standards and guidelines) contain provisions that apply to the processes dealt with in this module. \n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines. \n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019. \n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols. \n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf. \n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017. \n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War? The Gender Dimensions of Violence in DDR, 2012. \n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs. Effective Weapons and Ammunition Management in a Changing Disarma- ment, Demobilization and Reintegration Context. Handbook for United Nations DDR practitioners. 2018. Referred as \u2018DDR WAM Handbook\u2019 in this standard. \n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf. \n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -80076,14 +80076,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols.", + "Sentence": "\n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols.", "newParagraph": "following normative document ie document containing applicable norm standard guideline contain provision apply process dealt module n international ammunition technical guideline httpswwwunorgdisarmament unsaferguardguidelines n international standard organization iso guide 51 safety aspect guideline inclusion standard n modular smallarmscontrol implementation compendium httpswwwunorg disarmamentconvarmsmosaic n small arm survey south eastern eastern europe clearinghouse control small arm seesac salw survey protocol httpwwwseesacorg surveyprotocols n weapon ammunition management policy united nation department operational support department peace operation department political peacebuilding affair department safety security 2019 httpdagunorg bitstreamhandle11176400906weapons20and20ammunition20policypdf n un department political affair un department peacekeeping operation aide memoire engaging nonstate armed group nsags political purpose consideration un mediator mission 2017 n un development programme blame war gender dimension violence ddr 2012 n un department peacekeeping operation un office disarmament af fair effective weapon ammunition management changing disarma ment demobilization reintegration context handbook united nation ddr practitioner 2018 referred ddr wam handbook standard n un institute disarmament research utilizing international ammunition tech nical guideline conflictaffected lowcapacity environment 2019 http wwwunidirorgfilespublicationspdfsutilizingtheinternationalammunitiontech nicalguidelinesinconflictaffectedandlowcapacityenvironmentsen749pdf n un institute disarmament research role weapon ammunition management preventing conflict supporting security transition 2019 httpswwwunidirorgpublicationroleweaponandammunitionmanage mentpreventingconflictandsupportingsecurity", "ProcessedSent": "n small arm survey south eastern eastern europe clearinghouse control small arm seesac salw survey protocol httpwwwseesacorg surveyprotocols", "SentID": 4448 }, { "ParagraphID": 1416, - "Paragraph": "The following normative documents (i.e., documents containing applicable norms, standards and guidelines) contain provisions that apply to the processes dealt with in this module. \\n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines. \\n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019. \\n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \\n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols. \\n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf. \\n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017. \\n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War? The Gender Dimensions of Violence in DDR, 2012. \\n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs. Effective Weapons and Ammunition Management in a Changing Disarma- ment, Demobilization and Reintegration Context. Handbook for United Nations DDR practitioners. 2018. Referred as \u2018DDR WAM Handbook\u2019 in this standard. \\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf. \\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", + "Paragraph": "The following normative documents (i.e., documents containing applicable norms, standards and guidelines) contain provisions that apply to the processes dealt with in this module. \n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines. \n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019. \n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols. \n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf. \n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017. \n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War? The Gender Dimensions of Violence in DDR, 2012. \n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs. Effective Weapons and Ammunition Management in a Changing Disarma- ment, Demobilization and Reintegration Context. Handbook for United Nations DDR practitioners. 2018. Referred as \u2018DDR WAM Handbook\u2019 in this standard. \n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf. \n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -80094,14 +80094,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf.", + "Sentence": "\n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf.", "newParagraph": "following normative document ie document containing applicable norm standard guideline contain provision apply process dealt module n international ammunition technical guideline httpswwwunorgdisarmament unsaferguardguidelines n international standard organization iso guide 51 safety aspect guideline inclusion standard n modular smallarmscontrol implementation compendium httpswwwunorg disarmamentconvarmsmosaic n small arm survey south eastern eastern europe clearinghouse control small arm seesac salw survey protocol httpwwwseesacorg surveyprotocols n weapon ammunition management policy united nation department operational support department peace operation department political peacebuilding affair department safety security 2019 httpdagunorg bitstreamhandle11176400906weapons20and20ammunition20policypdf n un department political affair un department peacekeeping operation aide memoire engaging nonstate armed group nsags political purpose consideration un mediator mission 2017 n un development programme blame war gender dimension violence ddr 2012 n un department peacekeeping operation un office disarmament af fair effective weapon ammunition management changing disarma ment demobilization reintegration context handbook united nation ddr practitioner 2018 referred ddr wam handbook standard n un institute disarmament research utilizing international ammunition tech nical guideline conflictaffected lowcapacity environment 2019 http wwwunidirorgfilespublicationspdfsutilizingtheinternationalammunitiontech nicalguidelinesinconflictaffectedandlowcapacityenvironmentsen749pdf n un institute disarmament research role weapon ammunition management preventing conflict supporting security transition 2019 httpswwwunidirorgpublicationroleweaponandammunitionmanage mentpreventingconflictandsupportingsecurity", "ProcessedSent": "n weapon ammunition management policy united nation department operational support department peace operation department political peacebuilding affair department safety security 2019 httpdagunorg bitstreamhandle11176400906weapons20and20ammunition20policypdf", "SentID": 4449 }, { "ParagraphID": 1416, - "Paragraph": "The following normative documents (i.e., documents containing applicable norms, standards and guidelines) contain provisions that apply to the processes dealt with in this module. \\n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines. \\n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019. \\n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \\n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols. \\n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf. \\n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017. \\n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War? The Gender Dimensions of Violence in DDR, 2012. \\n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs. Effective Weapons and Ammunition Management in a Changing Disarma- ment, Demobilization and Reintegration Context. Handbook for United Nations DDR practitioners. 2018. Referred as \u2018DDR WAM Handbook\u2019 in this standard. \\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf. \\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", + "Paragraph": "The following normative documents (i.e., documents containing applicable norms, standards and guidelines) contain provisions that apply to the processes dealt with in this module. \n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines. \n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019. \n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols. \n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf. \n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017. \n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War? The Gender Dimensions of Violence in DDR, 2012. \n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs. Effective Weapons and Ammunition Management in a Changing Disarma- ment, Demobilization and Reintegration Context. Handbook for United Nations DDR practitioners. 2018. Referred as \u2018DDR WAM Handbook\u2019 in this standard. \n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf. \n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -80112,14 +80112,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017.", + "Sentence": "\n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017.", "newParagraph": "following normative document ie document containing applicable norm standard guideline contain provision apply process dealt module n international ammunition technical guideline httpswwwunorgdisarmament unsaferguardguidelines n international standard organization iso guide 51 safety aspect guideline inclusion standard n modular smallarmscontrol implementation compendium httpswwwunorg disarmamentconvarmsmosaic n small arm survey south eastern eastern europe clearinghouse control small arm seesac salw survey protocol httpwwwseesacorg surveyprotocols n weapon ammunition management policy united nation department operational support department peace operation department political peacebuilding affair department safety security 2019 httpdagunorg bitstreamhandle11176400906weapons20and20ammunition20policypdf n un department political affair un department peacekeeping operation aide memoire engaging nonstate armed group nsags political purpose consideration un mediator mission 2017 n un development programme blame war gender dimension violence ddr 2012 n un department peacekeeping operation un office disarmament af fair effective weapon ammunition management changing disarma ment demobilization reintegration context handbook united nation ddr practitioner 2018 referred ddr wam handbook standard n un institute disarmament research utilizing international ammunition tech nical guideline conflictaffected lowcapacity environment 2019 http wwwunidirorgfilespublicationspdfsutilizingtheinternationalammunitiontech nicalguidelinesinconflictaffectedandlowcapacityenvironmentsen749pdf n un institute disarmament research role weapon ammunition management preventing conflict supporting security transition 2019 httpswwwunidirorgpublicationroleweaponandammunitionmanage mentpreventingconflictandsupportingsecurity", "ProcessedSent": "n un department political affair un department peacekeeping operation aide memoire engaging nonstate armed group nsags political purpose consideration un mediator mission 2017", "SentID": 4450 }, { "ParagraphID": 1416, - "Paragraph": "The following normative documents (i.e., documents containing applicable norms, standards and guidelines) contain provisions that apply to the processes dealt with in this module. \\n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines. \\n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019. \\n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \\n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols. \\n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf. \\n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017. \\n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War? The Gender Dimensions of Violence in DDR, 2012. \\n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs. Effective Weapons and Ammunition Management in a Changing Disarma- ment, Demobilization and Reintegration Context. Handbook for United Nations DDR practitioners. 2018. Referred as \u2018DDR WAM Handbook\u2019 in this standard. \\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf. \\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", + "Paragraph": "The following normative documents (i.e., documents containing applicable norms, standards and guidelines) contain provisions that apply to the processes dealt with in this module. \n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines. \n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019. \n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols. \n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf. \n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017. \n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War? The Gender Dimensions of Violence in DDR, 2012. \n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs. Effective Weapons and Ammunition Management in a Changing Disarma- ment, Demobilization and Reintegration Context. Handbook for United Nations DDR practitioners. 2018. Referred as \u2018DDR WAM Handbook\u2019 in this standard. \n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf. \n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -80130,14 +80130,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War?", + "Sentence": "\n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War?", "newParagraph": "following normative document ie document containing applicable norm standard guideline contain provision apply process dealt module n international ammunition technical guideline httpswwwunorgdisarmament unsaferguardguidelines n international standard organization iso guide 51 safety aspect guideline inclusion standard n modular smallarmscontrol implementation compendium httpswwwunorg disarmamentconvarmsmosaic n small arm survey south eastern eastern europe clearinghouse control small arm seesac salw survey protocol httpwwwseesacorg surveyprotocols n weapon ammunition management policy united nation department operational support department peace operation department political peacebuilding affair department safety security 2019 httpdagunorg bitstreamhandle11176400906weapons20and20ammunition20policypdf n un department political affair un department peacekeeping operation aide memoire engaging nonstate armed group nsags political purpose consideration un mediator mission 2017 n un development programme blame war gender dimension violence ddr 2012 n un department peacekeeping operation un office disarmament af fair effective weapon ammunition management changing disarma ment demobilization reintegration context handbook united nation ddr practitioner 2018 referred ddr wam handbook standard n un institute disarmament research utilizing international ammunition tech nical guideline conflictaffected lowcapacity environment 2019 http wwwunidirorgfilespublicationspdfsutilizingtheinternationalammunitiontech nicalguidelinesinconflictaffectedandlowcapacityenvironmentsen749pdf n un institute disarmament research role weapon ammunition management preventing conflict supporting security transition 2019 httpswwwunidirorgpublicationroleweaponandammunitionmanage mentpreventingconflictandsupportingsecurity", "ProcessedSent": "n un development programme blame war", "SentID": 4451 }, { "ParagraphID": 1416, - "Paragraph": "The following normative documents (i.e., documents containing applicable norms, standards and guidelines) contain provisions that apply to the processes dealt with in this module. \\n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines. \\n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019. \\n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \\n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols. \\n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf. \\n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017. \\n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War? The Gender Dimensions of Violence in DDR, 2012. \\n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs. Effective Weapons and Ammunition Management in a Changing Disarma- ment, Demobilization and Reintegration Context. Handbook for United Nations DDR practitioners. 2018. Referred as \u2018DDR WAM Handbook\u2019 in this standard. \\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf. \\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", + "Paragraph": "The following normative documents (i.e., documents containing applicable norms, standards and guidelines) contain provisions that apply to the processes dealt with in this module. \n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines. \n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019. \n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols. \n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf. \n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017. \n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War? The Gender Dimensions of Violence in DDR, 2012. \n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs. Effective Weapons and Ammunition Management in a Changing Disarma- ment, Demobilization and Reintegration Context. Handbook for United Nations DDR practitioners. 2018. Referred as \u2018DDR WAM Handbook\u2019 in this standard. \n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf. \n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -80155,7 +80155,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1416, - "Paragraph": "The following normative documents (i.e., documents containing applicable norms, standards and guidelines) contain provisions that apply to the processes dealt with in this module. \\n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines. \\n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019. \\n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \\n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols. \\n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf. \\n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017. \\n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War? The Gender Dimensions of Violence in DDR, 2012. \\n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs. Effective Weapons and Ammunition Management in a Changing Disarma- ment, Demobilization and Reintegration Context. Handbook for United Nations DDR practitioners. 2018. Referred as \u2018DDR WAM Handbook\u2019 in this standard. \\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf. \\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", + "Paragraph": "The following normative documents (i.e., documents containing applicable norms, standards and guidelines) contain provisions that apply to the processes dealt with in this module. \n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines. \n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019. \n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols. \n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf. \n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017. \n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War? The Gender Dimensions of Violence in DDR, 2012. \n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs. Effective Weapons and Ammunition Management in a Changing Disarma- ment, Demobilization and Reintegration Context. Handbook for United Nations DDR practitioners. 2018. Referred as \u2018DDR WAM Handbook\u2019 in this standard. \n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf. \n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -80166,14 +80166,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs.", + "Sentence": "\n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs.", "newParagraph": "following normative document ie document containing applicable norm standard guideline contain provision apply process dealt module n international ammunition technical guideline httpswwwunorgdisarmament unsaferguardguidelines n international standard organization iso guide 51 safety aspect guideline inclusion standard n modular smallarmscontrol implementation compendium httpswwwunorg disarmamentconvarmsmosaic n small arm survey south eastern eastern europe clearinghouse control small arm seesac salw survey protocol httpwwwseesacorg surveyprotocols n weapon ammunition management policy united nation department operational support department peace operation department political peacebuilding affair department safety security 2019 httpdagunorg bitstreamhandle11176400906weapons20and20ammunition20policypdf n un department political affair un department peacekeeping operation aide memoire engaging nonstate armed group nsags political purpose consideration un mediator mission 2017 n un development programme blame war gender dimension violence ddr 2012 n un department peacekeeping operation un office disarmament af fair effective weapon ammunition management changing disarma ment demobilization reintegration context handbook united nation ddr practitioner 2018 referred ddr wam handbook standard n un institute disarmament research utilizing international ammunition tech nical guideline conflictaffected lowcapacity environment 2019 http wwwunidirorgfilespublicationspdfsutilizingtheinternationalammunitiontech nicalguidelinesinconflictaffectedandlowcapacityenvironmentsen749pdf n un institute disarmament research role weapon ammunition management preventing conflict supporting security transition 2019 httpswwwunidirorgpublicationroleweaponandammunitionmanage mentpreventingconflictandsupportingsecurity", "ProcessedSent": "n un department peacekeeping operation un office disarmament af fair", "SentID": 4453 }, { "ParagraphID": 1416, - "Paragraph": "The following normative documents (i.e., documents containing applicable norms, standards and guidelines) contain provisions that apply to the processes dealt with in this module. \\n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines. \\n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019. \\n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \\n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols. \\n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf. \\n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017. \\n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War? The Gender Dimensions of Violence in DDR, 2012. \\n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs. Effective Weapons and Ammunition Management in a Changing Disarma- ment, Demobilization and Reintegration Context. Handbook for United Nations DDR practitioners. 2018. Referred as \u2018DDR WAM Handbook\u2019 in this standard. \\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf. \\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", + "Paragraph": "The following normative documents (i.e., documents containing applicable norms, standards and guidelines) contain provisions that apply to the processes dealt with in this module. \n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines. \n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019. \n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols. \n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf. \n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017. \n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War? The Gender Dimensions of Violence in DDR, 2012. \n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs. Effective Weapons and Ammunition Management in a Changing Disarma- ment, Demobilization and Reintegration Context. Handbook for United Nations DDR practitioners. 2018. Referred as \u2018DDR WAM Handbook\u2019 in this standard. \n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf. \n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -80191,7 +80191,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1416, - "Paragraph": "The following normative documents (i.e., documents containing applicable norms, standards and guidelines) contain provisions that apply to the processes dealt with in this module. \\n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines. \\n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019. \\n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \\n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols. \\n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf. \\n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017. \\n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War? The Gender Dimensions of Violence in DDR, 2012. \\n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs. Effective Weapons and Ammunition Management in a Changing Disarma- ment, Demobilization and Reintegration Context. Handbook for United Nations DDR practitioners. 2018. Referred as \u2018DDR WAM Handbook\u2019 in this standard. \\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf. \\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", + "Paragraph": "The following normative documents (i.e., documents containing applicable norms, standards and guidelines) contain provisions that apply to the processes dealt with in this module. \n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines. \n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019. \n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols. \n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf. \n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017. \n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War? The Gender Dimensions of Violence in DDR, 2012. \n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs. Effective Weapons and Ammunition Management in a Changing Disarma- ment, Demobilization and Reintegration Context. Handbook for United Nations DDR practitioners. 2018. Referred as \u2018DDR WAM Handbook\u2019 in this standard. \n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf. \n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -80209,7 +80209,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1416, - "Paragraph": "The following normative documents (i.e., documents containing applicable norms, standards and guidelines) contain provisions that apply to the processes dealt with in this module. \\n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines. \\n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019. \\n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \\n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols. \\n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf. \\n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017. \\n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War? The Gender Dimensions of Violence in DDR, 2012. \\n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs. Effective Weapons and Ammunition Management in a Changing Disarma- ment, Demobilization and Reintegration Context. Handbook for United Nations DDR practitioners. 2018. Referred as \u2018DDR WAM Handbook\u2019 in this standard. \\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf. \\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", + "Paragraph": "The following normative documents (i.e., documents containing applicable norms, standards and guidelines) contain provisions that apply to the processes dealt with in this module. \n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines. \n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019. \n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols. \n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf. \n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017. \n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War? The Gender Dimensions of Violence in DDR, 2012. \n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs. Effective Weapons and Ammunition Management in a Changing Disarma- ment, Demobilization and Reintegration Context. Handbook for United Nations DDR practitioners. 2018. Referred as \u2018DDR WAM Handbook\u2019 in this standard. \n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf. \n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -80227,7 +80227,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1416, - "Paragraph": "The following normative documents (i.e., documents containing applicable norms, standards and guidelines) contain provisions that apply to the processes dealt with in this module. \\n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines. \\n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019. \\n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \\n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols. \\n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf. \\n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017. \\n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War? The Gender Dimensions of Violence in DDR, 2012. \\n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs. Effective Weapons and Ammunition Management in a Changing Disarma- ment, Demobilization and Reintegration Context. Handbook for United Nations DDR practitioners. 2018. Referred as \u2018DDR WAM Handbook\u2019 in this standard. \\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf. \\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", + "Paragraph": "The following normative documents (i.e., documents containing applicable norms, standards and guidelines) contain provisions that apply to the processes dealt with in this module. \n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines. \n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019. \n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols. \n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf. \n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017. \n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War? The Gender Dimensions of Violence in DDR, 2012. \n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs. Effective Weapons and Ammunition Management in a Changing Disarma- ment, Demobilization and Reintegration Context. Handbook for United Nations DDR practitioners. 2018. Referred as \u2018DDR WAM Handbook\u2019 in this standard. \n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf. \n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -80245,7 +80245,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1416, - "Paragraph": "The following normative documents (i.e., documents containing applicable norms, standards and guidelines) contain provisions that apply to the processes dealt with in this module. \\n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines. \\n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019. \\n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \\n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols. \\n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf. \\n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017. \\n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War? The Gender Dimensions of Violence in DDR, 2012. \\n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs. Effective Weapons and Ammunition Management in a Changing Disarma- ment, Demobilization and Reintegration Context. Handbook for United Nations DDR practitioners. 2018. Referred as \u2018DDR WAM Handbook\u2019 in this standard. \\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf. \\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", + "Paragraph": "The following normative documents (i.e., documents containing applicable norms, standards and guidelines) contain provisions that apply to the processes dealt with in this module. \n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines. \n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019. \n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols. \n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf. \n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017. \n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War? The Gender Dimensions of Violence in DDR, 2012. \n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs. Effective Weapons and Ammunition Management in a Changing Disarma- ment, Demobilization and Reintegration Context. Handbook for United Nations DDR practitioners. 2018. Referred as \u2018DDR WAM Handbook\u2019 in this standard. \n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf. \n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -80256,14 +80256,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf.", + "Sentence": "\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf.", "newParagraph": "following normative document ie document containing applicable norm standard guideline contain provision apply process dealt module n international ammunition technical guideline httpswwwunorgdisarmament unsaferguardguidelines n international standard organization iso guide 51 safety aspect guideline inclusion standard n modular smallarmscontrol implementation compendium httpswwwunorg disarmamentconvarmsmosaic n small arm survey south eastern eastern europe clearinghouse control small arm seesac salw survey protocol httpwwwseesacorg surveyprotocols n weapon ammunition management policy united nation department operational support department peace operation department political peacebuilding affair department safety security 2019 httpdagunorg bitstreamhandle11176400906weapons20and20ammunition20policypdf n un department political affair un department peacekeeping operation aide memoire engaging nonstate armed group nsags political purpose consideration un mediator mission 2017 n un development programme blame war gender dimension violence ddr 2012 n un department peacekeeping operation un office disarmament af fair effective weapon ammunition management changing disarma ment demobilization reintegration context handbook united nation ddr practitioner 2018 referred ddr wam handbook standard n un institute disarmament research utilizing international ammunition tech nical guideline conflictaffected lowcapacity environment 2019 http wwwunidirorgfilespublicationspdfsutilizingtheinternationalammunitiontech nicalguidelinesinconflictaffectedandlowcapacityenvironmentsen749pdf n un institute disarmament research role weapon ammunition management preventing conflict supporting security transition 2019 httpswwwunidirorgpublicationroleweaponandammunitionmanage mentpreventingconflictandsupportingsecurity", "ProcessedSent": "n un institute disarmament research utilizing international ammunition tech nical guideline conflictaffected lowcapacity environment 2019 http wwwunidirorgfilespublicationspdfsutilizingtheinternationalammunitiontech nicalguidelinesinconflictaffectedandlowcapacityenvironmentsen749pdf", "SentID": 4458 }, { "ParagraphID": 1416, - "Paragraph": "The following normative documents (i.e., documents containing applicable norms, standards and guidelines) contain provisions that apply to the processes dealt with in this module. \\n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines. \\n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019. \\n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \\n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols. \\n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf. \\n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017. \\n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War? The Gender Dimensions of Violence in DDR, 2012. \\n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs. Effective Weapons and Ammunition Management in a Changing Disarma- ment, Demobilization and Reintegration Context. Handbook for United Nations DDR practitioners. 2018. Referred as \u2018DDR WAM Handbook\u2019 in this standard. \\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf. \\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", + "Paragraph": "The following normative documents (i.e., documents containing applicable norms, standards and guidelines) contain provisions that apply to the processes dealt with in this module. \n International Ammunition Technical Guidelines, https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/ un-saferguard\/guide-lines. \n International Standards Organization, ISO Guide 51: \u2018Safety Aspects: Guidelines for Their Inclusion in Standards\u2019. \n Modular Small-arms-control Implementation Compendium, https:\/\/www.un.org\/ disarmament\/convarms\/mosaic. \n Small Arms Survey and South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms (SEESAC), SALW Survey Protocols, http:\/\/www.seesac.org\/ Survey-Protocols. \n Weapons and Ammunition Management Policy, United Nations Department of Operational Support, Department of Peace Operations, Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, Department of Safety and Security, 2019. http:\/\/dag.un.org\/ bitstream\/handle\/11176\/400906\/Weapons%20and%20Ammunition%20Policy.pdf. \n UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Aide Memoire \u2013 Engaging with Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs) for Political Purposes: Considerations for UN Mediators and Missions, 2017. \n UN Development Programme, Blame It on the War? The Gender Dimensions of Violence in DDR, 2012. \n UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and UN Office for Disarmament Af- fairs. Effective Weapons and Ammunition Management in a Changing Disarma- ment, Demobilization and Reintegration Context. Handbook for United Nations DDR practitioners. 2018. Referred as \u2018DDR WAM Handbook\u2019 in this standard. \n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Utilizing the International Ammunition Tech- nical Guidelines in Conflict-Affected and Low-Capacity Environments, 2019, http:\/\/ www.unidir.org\/files\/publications\/pdfs\/utilizing-the-international-ammunition-tech- nical-guidelines-in-conflict-affected-and-low-capacity-environments-en-749.pdf. \n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -80274,14 +80274,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", + "Sentence": "\n UN Institute for Disarmament Research, The Role of Weapon and Ammunition Management in Preventing Conflict and Supporting Security Transition, 2019, https:\/\/www.unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-manage- ment-preventing-conflict-and-supporting-security.", "newParagraph": "following normative document ie document containing applicable norm standard guideline contain provision apply process dealt module n international ammunition technical guideline httpswwwunorgdisarmament unsaferguardguidelines n international standard organization iso guide 51 safety aspect guideline inclusion standard n modular smallarmscontrol implementation compendium httpswwwunorg disarmamentconvarmsmosaic n small arm survey south eastern eastern europe clearinghouse control small arm seesac salw survey protocol httpwwwseesacorg surveyprotocols n weapon ammunition management policy united nation department operational support department peace operation department political peacebuilding affair department safety security 2019 httpdagunorg bitstreamhandle11176400906weapons20and20ammunition20policypdf n un department political affair un department peacekeeping operation aide memoire engaging nonstate armed group nsags political purpose consideration un mediator mission 2017 n un development programme blame war gender dimension violence ddr 2012 n un department peacekeeping operation un office disarmament af fair effective weapon ammunition management changing disarma ment demobilization reintegration context handbook united nation ddr practitioner 2018 referred ddr wam handbook standard n un institute disarmament research utilizing international ammunition tech nical guideline conflictaffected lowcapacity environment 2019 http wwwunidirorgfilespublicationspdfsutilizingtheinternationalammunitiontech nicalguidelinesinconflictaffectedandlowcapacityenvironmentsen749pdf n un institute disarmament research role weapon ammunition management preventing conflict supporting security transition 2019 httpswwwunidirorgpublicationroleweaponandammunitionmanage mentpreventingconflictandsupportingsecurity", "ProcessedSent": "n un institute disarmament research role weapon ammunition management preventing conflict supporting security transition 2019 httpswwwunidirorgpublicationroleweaponandammunitionmanage mentpreventingconflictandsupportingsecurity", "SentID": 4459 }, { "ParagraphID": 1417, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 See https:\/\/unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-management-preventing-con- flict-and-supporting-security \\n 2 See, for instance, Article 7.4 of the Arms Trade Treaty and section II.B.2 in the Report of the Third United Nations Conference to Review Progress Made in the Implementation of the Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects (A\/CONF.192\/2018\/RC\/3). \\n 3 A world map including all relevant regional instruments can be consulted in the DDR WAM Hand- book, p. xx, and the texts of the various conventions and protocols can be found via www.un.org\/ disarmament. \\n 4 Also see DDR WAM Handbook Unit 5. \\n 5 Ibid., Units 14 and 16. \\n 6 Ibid., Unit 13.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 See https:\/\/unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-management-preventing-con- flict-and-supporting-security \n 2 See, for instance, Article 7.4 of the Arms Trade Treaty and section II.B.2 in the Report of the Third United Nations Conference to Review Progress Made in the Implementation of the Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects (A\/CONF.192\/2018\/RC\/3). \n 3 A world map including all relevant regional instruments can be consulted in the DDR WAM Hand- book, p. xx, and the texts of the various conventions and protocols can be found via www.un.org\/ disarmament. \n 4 Also see DDR WAM Handbook Unit 5. \n 5 Ibid., Units 14 and 16. \n 6 Ibid., Unit 13.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -80292,14 +80292,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 1 See https:\/\/unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-management-preventing-con- flict-and-supporting-security \\n 2 See, for instance, Article 7.4 of the Arms Trade Treaty and section II.B.2 in the Report of the Third United Nations Conference to Review Progress Made in the Implementation of the Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects (A\/CONF.192\/2018\/RC\/3).", + "Sentence": "\n 1 See https:\/\/unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-management-preventing-con- flict-and-supporting-security \n 2 See, for instance, Article 7.4 of the Arms Trade Treaty and section II.B.2 in the Report of the Third United Nations Conference to Review Progress Made in the Implementation of the Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects (A\/CONF.192\/2018\/RC\/3).", "newParagraph": "n 1 see httpsunidirorgpublicationroleweaponandammunitionmanagementpreventingcon flictandsupportingsecurity n 2 see instance article 74 arm trade treaty section iib2 report third united nation conference review progress made implementation programme action prevent combat eradicate illicit trade small arm light weapon aspect aconf1922018rc3 n 3 world map including relevant regional instrument consulted ddr wam hand book p xx text various convention protocol found via wwwunorg disarmament n 4 also see ddr wam handbook unit 5 n 5 ibid unit 14 16 n 6 ibid unit 13", "ProcessedSent": "n 1 see httpsunidirorgpublicationroleweaponandammunitionmanagementpreventingcon flictandsupportingsecurity n 2 see instance article 74 arm trade treaty section iib2 report third united nation conference review progress made implementation programme action prevent combat eradicate illicit trade small arm light weapon aspect aconf1922018rc3", "SentID": 4460 }, { "ParagraphID": 1417, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 See https:\/\/unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-management-preventing-con- flict-and-supporting-security \\n 2 See, for instance, Article 7.4 of the Arms Trade Treaty and section II.B.2 in the Report of the Third United Nations Conference to Review Progress Made in the Implementation of the Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects (A\/CONF.192\/2018\/RC\/3). \\n 3 A world map including all relevant regional instruments can be consulted in the DDR WAM Hand- book, p. xx, and the texts of the various conventions and protocols can be found via www.un.org\/ disarmament. \\n 4 Also see DDR WAM Handbook Unit 5. \\n 5 Ibid., Units 14 and 16. \\n 6 Ibid., Unit 13.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 See https:\/\/unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-management-preventing-con- flict-and-supporting-security \n 2 See, for instance, Article 7.4 of the Arms Trade Treaty and section II.B.2 in the Report of the Third United Nations Conference to Review Progress Made in the Implementation of the Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects (A\/CONF.192\/2018\/RC\/3). \n 3 A world map including all relevant regional instruments can be consulted in the DDR WAM Hand- book, p. xx, and the texts of the various conventions and protocols can be found via www.un.org\/ disarmament. \n 4 Also see DDR WAM Handbook Unit 5. \n 5 Ibid., Units 14 and 16. \n 6 Ibid., Unit 13.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -80310,14 +80310,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 3 A world map including all relevant regional instruments can be consulted in the DDR WAM Hand- book, p. xx, and the texts of the various conventions and protocols can be found via www.un.org\/ disarmament.", + "Sentence": "\n 3 A world map including all relevant regional instruments can be consulted in the DDR WAM Hand- book, p. xx, and the texts of the various conventions and protocols can be found via www.un.org\/ disarmament.", "newParagraph": "n 1 see httpsunidirorgpublicationroleweaponandammunitionmanagementpreventingcon flictandsupportingsecurity n 2 see instance article 74 arm trade treaty section iib2 report third united nation conference review progress made implementation programme action prevent combat eradicate illicit trade small arm light weapon aspect aconf1922018rc3 n 3 world map including relevant regional instrument consulted ddr wam hand book p xx text various convention protocol found via wwwunorg disarmament n 4 also see ddr wam handbook unit 5 n 5 ibid unit 14 16 n 6 ibid unit 13", "ProcessedSent": "n 3 world map including relevant regional instrument consulted ddr wam hand book p xx text various convention protocol found via wwwunorg disarmament", "SentID": 4461 }, { "ParagraphID": 1417, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 See https:\/\/unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-management-preventing-con- flict-and-supporting-security \\n 2 See, for instance, Article 7.4 of the Arms Trade Treaty and section II.B.2 in the Report of the Third United Nations Conference to Review Progress Made in the Implementation of the Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects (A\/CONF.192\/2018\/RC\/3). \\n 3 A world map including all relevant regional instruments can be consulted in the DDR WAM Hand- book, p. xx, and the texts of the various conventions and protocols can be found via www.un.org\/ disarmament. \\n 4 Also see DDR WAM Handbook Unit 5. \\n 5 Ibid., Units 14 and 16. \\n 6 Ibid., Unit 13.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 See https:\/\/unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-management-preventing-con- flict-and-supporting-security \n 2 See, for instance, Article 7.4 of the Arms Trade Treaty and section II.B.2 in the Report of the Third United Nations Conference to Review Progress Made in the Implementation of the Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects (A\/CONF.192\/2018\/RC\/3). \n 3 A world map including all relevant regional instruments can be consulted in the DDR WAM Hand- book, p. xx, and the texts of the various conventions and protocols can be found via www.un.org\/ disarmament. \n 4 Also see DDR WAM Handbook Unit 5. \n 5 Ibid., Units 14 and 16. \n 6 Ibid., Unit 13.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -80328,14 +80328,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 4 Also see DDR WAM Handbook Unit 5.", + "Sentence": "\n 4 Also see DDR WAM Handbook Unit 5.", "newParagraph": "n 1 see httpsunidirorgpublicationroleweaponandammunitionmanagementpreventingcon flictandsupportingsecurity n 2 see instance article 74 arm trade treaty section iib2 report third united nation conference review progress made implementation programme action prevent combat eradicate illicit trade small arm light weapon aspect aconf1922018rc3 n 3 world map including relevant regional instrument consulted ddr wam hand book p xx text various convention protocol found via wwwunorg disarmament n 4 also see ddr wam handbook unit 5 n 5 ibid unit 14 16 n 6 ibid unit 13", "ProcessedSent": "n 4 also see ddr wam handbook unit 5", "SentID": 4462 }, { "ParagraphID": 1417, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 See https:\/\/unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-management-preventing-con- flict-and-supporting-security \\n 2 See, for instance, Article 7.4 of the Arms Trade Treaty and section II.B.2 in the Report of the Third United Nations Conference to Review Progress Made in the Implementation of the Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects (A\/CONF.192\/2018\/RC\/3). \\n 3 A world map including all relevant regional instruments can be consulted in the DDR WAM Hand- book, p. xx, and the texts of the various conventions and protocols can be found via www.un.org\/ disarmament. \\n 4 Also see DDR WAM Handbook Unit 5. \\n 5 Ibid., Units 14 and 16. \\n 6 Ibid., Unit 13.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 See https:\/\/unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-management-preventing-con- flict-and-supporting-security \n 2 See, for instance, Article 7.4 of the Arms Trade Treaty and section II.B.2 in the Report of the Third United Nations Conference to Review Progress Made in the Implementation of the Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects (A\/CONF.192\/2018\/RC\/3). \n 3 A world map including all relevant regional instruments can be consulted in the DDR WAM Hand- book, p. xx, and the texts of the various conventions and protocols can be found via www.un.org\/ disarmament. \n 4 Also see DDR WAM Handbook Unit 5. \n 5 Ibid., Units 14 and 16. \n 6 Ibid., Unit 13.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -80346,14 +80346,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 5 Ibid., Units 14 and 16.", + "Sentence": "\n 5 Ibid., Units 14 and 16.", "newParagraph": "n 1 see httpsunidirorgpublicationroleweaponandammunitionmanagementpreventingcon flictandsupportingsecurity n 2 see instance article 74 arm trade treaty section iib2 report third united nation conference review progress made implementation programme action prevent combat eradicate illicit trade small arm light weapon aspect aconf1922018rc3 n 3 world map including relevant regional instrument consulted ddr wam hand book p xx text various convention protocol found via wwwunorg disarmament n 4 also see ddr wam handbook unit 5 n 5 ibid unit 14 16 n 6 ibid unit 13", "ProcessedSent": "n 5 ibid unit 14 16", "SentID": 4463 }, { "ParagraphID": 1417, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 See https:\/\/unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-management-preventing-con- flict-and-supporting-security \\n 2 See, for instance, Article 7.4 of the Arms Trade Treaty and section II.B.2 in the Report of the Third United Nations Conference to Review Progress Made in the Implementation of the Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects (A\/CONF.192\/2018\/RC\/3). \\n 3 A world map including all relevant regional instruments can be consulted in the DDR WAM Hand- book, p. xx, and the texts of the various conventions and protocols can be found via www.un.org\/ disarmament. \\n 4 Also see DDR WAM Handbook Unit 5. \\n 5 Ibid., Units 14 and 16. \\n 6 Ibid., Unit 13.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 See https:\/\/unidir.org\/publication\/role-weapon-and-ammunition-management-preventing-con- flict-and-supporting-security \n 2 See, for instance, Article 7.4 of the Arms Trade Treaty and section II.B.2 in the Report of the Third United Nations Conference to Review Progress Made in the Implementation of the Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects (A\/CONF.192\/2018\/RC\/3). \n 3 A world map including all relevant regional instruments can be consulted in the DDR WAM Hand- book, p. xx, and the texts of the various conventions and protocols can be found via www.un.org\/ disarmament. \n 4 Also see DDR WAM Handbook Unit 5. \n 5 Ibid., Units 14 and 16. \n 6 Ibid., Unit 13.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -80364,7 +80364,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 6 Ibid., Unit 13.", + "Sentence": "\n 6 Ibid., Unit 13.", "newParagraph": "n 1 see httpsunidirorgpublicationroleweaponandammunitionmanagementpreventingcon flictandsupportingsecurity n 2 see instance article 74 arm trade treaty section iib2 report third united nation conference review progress made implementation programme action prevent combat eradicate illicit trade small arm light weapon aspect aconf1922018rc3 n 3 world map including relevant regional instrument consulted ddr wam hand book p xx text various convention protocol found via wwwunorg disarmament n 4 also see ddr wam handbook unit 5 n 5 ibid unit 14 16 n 6 ibid unit 13", "ProcessedSent": "n 6 ibid unit 13", "SentID": 4464 @@ -80911,7 +80911,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1426, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n a)\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b)\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c)\u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d)\u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \\n e)\u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n a)\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b)\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c)\u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d)\u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \n e)\u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -80929,7 +80929,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1426, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n a)\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b)\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c)\u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d)\u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \\n e)\u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n a)\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b)\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c)\u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d)\u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \n e)\u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -80940,7 +80940,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n a)\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b)\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c)\u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d)\u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \\n e)\u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n a)\u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b)\u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c)\u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d)\u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \n e)\u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may must used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "ProcessedSent": "use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "SentID": 4496 @@ -81541,7 +81541,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1437, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: WHEN NO DDR PROGRAMME IS IN PLACE \\n When the preconditions for a DDR programme do not exist, combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups may still decide to leave armed forces and groups, either individually or in small groups. Individuals leave armed forces and groups for many different reasons. Some become tired of life as a combatant, while others are sick or wounded and can no longer continue to fight. Some leave because they are disillusioned with the goals of the group, they see greater benefit in civilian life or they believe they have won. \\n In some circumstances, States also encourage this type of voluntary exit by offering safe pathways out of the group, either to push those who remain towards negotiated settlement or to deplete the military capacity of these groups in order to render them more vulnerable to defeat. These individuals might report to an amnesty commission or to State institutions that will formally recognize their transition to civilian status. Those who transition to civilian status in this way may be eligible to receive assistance through DDR-related tools such as community violence reduction initiatives and\/or to be provided with reintegration support (see IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR). Transitional assistance (similar to reinsertion as part of a DDR programme) may also be provided to these individuals. Different considerations and requirements apply when armed groups are designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: WHEN NO DDR PROGRAMME IS IN PLACE \n When the preconditions for a DDR programme do not exist, combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups may still decide to leave armed forces and groups, either individually or in small groups. Individuals leave armed forces and groups for many different reasons. Some become tired of life as a combatant, while others are sick or wounded and can no longer continue to fight. Some leave because they are disillusioned with the goals of the group, they see greater benefit in civilian life or they believe they have won. \n In some circumstances, States also encourage this type of voluntary exit by offering safe pathways out of the group, either to push those who remain towards negotiated settlement or to deplete the military capacity of these groups in order to render them more vulnerable to defeat. These individuals might report to an amnesty commission or to State institutions that will formally recognize their transition to civilian status. Those who transition to civilian status in this way may be eligible to receive assistance through DDR-related tools such as community violence reduction initiatives and\/or to be provided with reintegration support (see IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR). Transitional assistance (similar to reinsertion as part of a DDR programme) may also be provided to these individuals. Different considerations and requirements apply when armed groups are designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -81552,14 +81552,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "BOX 1: WHEN NO DDR PROGRAMME IS IN PLACE \\n When the preconditions for a DDR programme do not exist, combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups may still decide to leave armed forces and groups, either individually or in small groups.", + "Sentence": "BOX 1: WHEN NO DDR PROGRAMME IS IN PLACE \n When the preconditions for a DDR programme do not exist, combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups may still decide to leave armed forces and groups, either individually or in small groups.", "newParagraph": "box 1 ddr programme place n precondition ddr programme exist combatant person associated armed force group may still decide leave armed force group either individually small group individual leave armed force group many different reason become tired life combatant others sick wounded longer continue fight leave disillusioned goal group see greater benefit civilian life believe n circumstance state also encourage type voluntary exit offering safe pathway group either push remain towards negotiated settlement deplete military capacity group order render vulnerable defeat individual might report amnesty commission state institution formally recognize transition civilian status transition civilian status way may eligible receive assistance ddrrelated tool community violence reduction initiative andor provided reintegration support see iddrs 210 un approach ddr transitional assistance similar reinsertion part ddr programme may also provided individual different consideration requirement apply armed group designated terrorist organization see iddrs 211 legal framework un ddr", "ProcessedSent": "box 1 ddr programme place n precondition ddr programme exist combatant person associated armed force group may still decide leave armed force group either individually small group", "SentID": 4530 }, { "ParagraphID": 1437, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: WHEN NO DDR PROGRAMME IS IN PLACE \\n When the preconditions for a DDR programme do not exist, combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups may still decide to leave armed forces and groups, either individually or in small groups. Individuals leave armed forces and groups for many different reasons. Some become tired of life as a combatant, while others are sick or wounded and can no longer continue to fight. Some leave because they are disillusioned with the goals of the group, they see greater benefit in civilian life or they believe they have won. \\n In some circumstances, States also encourage this type of voluntary exit by offering safe pathways out of the group, either to push those who remain towards negotiated settlement or to deplete the military capacity of these groups in order to render them more vulnerable to defeat. These individuals might report to an amnesty commission or to State institutions that will formally recognize their transition to civilian status. Those who transition to civilian status in this way may be eligible to receive assistance through DDR-related tools such as community violence reduction initiatives and\/or to be provided with reintegration support (see IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR). Transitional assistance (similar to reinsertion as part of a DDR programme) may also be provided to these individuals. Different considerations and requirements apply when armed groups are designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: WHEN NO DDR PROGRAMME IS IN PLACE \n When the preconditions for a DDR programme do not exist, combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups may still decide to leave armed forces and groups, either individually or in small groups. Individuals leave armed forces and groups for many different reasons. Some become tired of life as a combatant, while others are sick or wounded and can no longer continue to fight. Some leave because they are disillusioned with the goals of the group, they see greater benefit in civilian life or they believe they have won. \n In some circumstances, States also encourage this type of voluntary exit by offering safe pathways out of the group, either to push those who remain towards negotiated settlement or to deplete the military capacity of these groups in order to render them more vulnerable to defeat. These individuals might report to an amnesty commission or to State institutions that will formally recognize their transition to civilian status. Those who transition to civilian status in this way may be eligible to receive assistance through DDR-related tools such as community violence reduction initiatives and\/or to be provided with reintegration support (see IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR). Transitional assistance (similar to reinsertion as part of a DDR programme) may also be provided to these individuals. Different considerations and requirements apply when armed groups are designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -81577,7 +81577,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1437, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: WHEN NO DDR PROGRAMME IS IN PLACE \\n When the preconditions for a DDR programme do not exist, combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups may still decide to leave armed forces and groups, either individually or in small groups. Individuals leave armed forces and groups for many different reasons. Some become tired of life as a combatant, while others are sick or wounded and can no longer continue to fight. Some leave because they are disillusioned with the goals of the group, they see greater benefit in civilian life or they believe they have won. \\n In some circumstances, States also encourage this type of voluntary exit by offering safe pathways out of the group, either to push those who remain towards negotiated settlement or to deplete the military capacity of these groups in order to render them more vulnerable to defeat. These individuals might report to an amnesty commission or to State institutions that will formally recognize their transition to civilian status. Those who transition to civilian status in this way may be eligible to receive assistance through DDR-related tools such as community violence reduction initiatives and\/or to be provided with reintegration support (see IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR). Transitional assistance (similar to reinsertion as part of a DDR programme) may also be provided to these individuals. Different considerations and requirements apply when armed groups are designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: WHEN NO DDR PROGRAMME IS IN PLACE \n When the preconditions for a DDR programme do not exist, combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups may still decide to leave armed forces and groups, either individually or in small groups. Individuals leave armed forces and groups for many different reasons. Some become tired of life as a combatant, while others are sick or wounded and can no longer continue to fight. Some leave because they are disillusioned with the goals of the group, they see greater benefit in civilian life or they believe they have won. \n In some circumstances, States also encourage this type of voluntary exit by offering safe pathways out of the group, either to push those who remain towards negotiated settlement or to deplete the military capacity of these groups in order to render them more vulnerable to defeat. These individuals might report to an amnesty commission or to State institutions that will formally recognize their transition to civilian status. Those who transition to civilian status in this way may be eligible to receive assistance through DDR-related tools such as community violence reduction initiatives and\/or to be provided with reintegration support (see IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR). Transitional assistance (similar to reinsertion as part of a DDR programme) may also be provided to these individuals. Different considerations and requirements apply when armed groups are designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -81595,7 +81595,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1437, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: WHEN NO DDR PROGRAMME IS IN PLACE \\n When the preconditions for a DDR programme do not exist, combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups may still decide to leave armed forces and groups, either individually or in small groups. Individuals leave armed forces and groups for many different reasons. Some become tired of life as a combatant, while others are sick or wounded and can no longer continue to fight. Some leave because they are disillusioned with the goals of the group, they see greater benefit in civilian life or they believe they have won. \\n In some circumstances, States also encourage this type of voluntary exit by offering safe pathways out of the group, either to push those who remain towards negotiated settlement or to deplete the military capacity of these groups in order to render them more vulnerable to defeat. These individuals might report to an amnesty commission or to State institutions that will formally recognize their transition to civilian status. Those who transition to civilian status in this way may be eligible to receive assistance through DDR-related tools such as community violence reduction initiatives and\/or to be provided with reintegration support (see IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR). Transitional assistance (similar to reinsertion as part of a DDR programme) may also be provided to these individuals. Different considerations and requirements apply when armed groups are designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: WHEN NO DDR PROGRAMME IS IN PLACE \n When the preconditions for a DDR programme do not exist, combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups may still decide to leave armed forces and groups, either individually or in small groups. Individuals leave armed forces and groups for many different reasons. Some become tired of life as a combatant, while others are sick or wounded and can no longer continue to fight. Some leave because they are disillusioned with the goals of the group, they see greater benefit in civilian life or they believe they have won. \n In some circumstances, States also encourage this type of voluntary exit by offering safe pathways out of the group, either to push those who remain towards negotiated settlement or to deplete the military capacity of these groups in order to render them more vulnerable to defeat. These individuals might report to an amnesty commission or to State institutions that will formally recognize their transition to civilian status. Those who transition to civilian status in this way may be eligible to receive assistance through DDR-related tools such as community violence reduction initiatives and\/or to be provided with reintegration support (see IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR). Transitional assistance (similar to reinsertion as part of a DDR programme) may also be provided to these individuals. Different considerations and requirements apply when armed groups are designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -81613,7 +81613,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1437, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: WHEN NO DDR PROGRAMME IS IN PLACE \\n When the preconditions for a DDR programme do not exist, combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups may still decide to leave armed forces and groups, either individually or in small groups. Individuals leave armed forces and groups for many different reasons. Some become tired of life as a combatant, while others are sick or wounded and can no longer continue to fight. Some leave because they are disillusioned with the goals of the group, they see greater benefit in civilian life or they believe they have won. \\n In some circumstances, States also encourage this type of voluntary exit by offering safe pathways out of the group, either to push those who remain towards negotiated settlement or to deplete the military capacity of these groups in order to render them more vulnerable to defeat. These individuals might report to an amnesty commission or to State institutions that will formally recognize their transition to civilian status. Those who transition to civilian status in this way may be eligible to receive assistance through DDR-related tools such as community violence reduction initiatives and\/or to be provided with reintegration support (see IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR). Transitional assistance (similar to reinsertion as part of a DDR programme) may also be provided to these individuals. Different considerations and requirements apply when armed groups are designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: WHEN NO DDR PROGRAMME IS IN PLACE \n When the preconditions for a DDR programme do not exist, combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups may still decide to leave armed forces and groups, either individually or in small groups. Individuals leave armed forces and groups for many different reasons. Some become tired of life as a combatant, while others are sick or wounded and can no longer continue to fight. Some leave because they are disillusioned with the goals of the group, they see greater benefit in civilian life or they believe they have won. \n In some circumstances, States also encourage this type of voluntary exit by offering safe pathways out of the group, either to push those who remain towards negotiated settlement or to deplete the military capacity of these groups in order to render them more vulnerable to defeat. These individuals might report to an amnesty commission or to State institutions that will formally recognize their transition to civilian status. Those who transition to civilian status in this way may be eligible to receive assistance through DDR-related tools such as community violence reduction initiatives and\/or to be provided with reintegration support (see IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR). Transitional assistance (similar to reinsertion as part of a DDR programme) may also be provided to these individuals. Different considerations and requirements apply when armed groups are designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -81624,14 +81624,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n In some circumstances, States also encourage this type of voluntary exit by offering safe pathways out of the group, either to push those who remain towards negotiated settlement or to deplete the military capacity of these groups in order to render them more vulnerable to defeat.", + "Sentence": "\n In some circumstances, States also encourage this type of voluntary exit by offering safe pathways out of the group, either to push those who remain towards negotiated settlement or to deplete the military capacity of these groups in order to render them more vulnerable to defeat.", "newParagraph": "box 1 ddr programme place n precondition ddr programme exist combatant person associated armed force group may still decide leave armed force group either individually small group individual leave armed force group many different reason become tired life combatant others sick wounded longer continue fight leave disillusioned goal group see greater benefit civilian life believe n circumstance state also encourage type voluntary exit offering safe pathway group either push remain towards negotiated settlement deplete military capacity group order render vulnerable defeat individual might report amnesty commission state institution formally recognize transition civilian status transition civilian status way may eligible receive assistance ddrrelated tool community violence reduction initiative andor provided reintegration support see iddrs 210 un approach ddr transitional assistance similar reinsertion part ddr programme may also provided individual different consideration requirement apply armed group designated terrorist organization see iddrs 211 legal framework un ddr", "ProcessedSent": "n circumstance state also encourage type voluntary exit offering safe pathway group either push remain towards negotiated settlement deplete military capacity group order render vulnerable defeat", "SentID": 4534 }, { "ParagraphID": 1437, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: WHEN NO DDR PROGRAMME IS IN PLACE \\n When the preconditions for a DDR programme do not exist, combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups may still decide to leave armed forces and groups, either individually or in small groups. Individuals leave armed forces and groups for many different reasons. Some become tired of life as a combatant, while others are sick or wounded and can no longer continue to fight. Some leave because they are disillusioned with the goals of the group, they see greater benefit in civilian life or they believe they have won. \\n In some circumstances, States also encourage this type of voluntary exit by offering safe pathways out of the group, either to push those who remain towards negotiated settlement or to deplete the military capacity of these groups in order to render them more vulnerable to defeat. These individuals might report to an amnesty commission or to State institutions that will formally recognize their transition to civilian status. Those who transition to civilian status in this way may be eligible to receive assistance through DDR-related tools such as community violence reduction initiatives and\/or to be provided with reintegration support (see IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR). Transitional assistance (similar to reinsertion as part of a DDR programme) may also be provided to these individuals. Different considerations and requirements apply when armed groups are designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: WHEN NO DDR PROGRAMME IS IN PLACE \n When the preconditions for a DDR programme do not exist, combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups may still decide to leave armed forces and groups, either individually or in small groups. Individuals leave armed forces and groups for many different reasons. Some become tired of life as a combatant, while others are sick or wounded and can no longer continue to fight. Some leave because they are disillusioned with the goals of the group, they see greater benefit in civilian life or they believe they have won. \n In some circumstances, States also encourage this type of voluntary exit by offering safe pathways out of the group, either to push those who remain towards negotiated settlement or to deplete the military capacity of these groups in order to render them more vulnerable to defeat. These individuals might report to an amnesty commission or to State institutions that will formally recognize their transition to civilian status. Those who transition to civilian status in this way may be eligible to receive assistance through DDR-related tools such as community violence reduction initiatives and\/or to be provided with reintegration support (see IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR). Transitional assistance (similar to reinsertion as part of a DDR programme) may also be provided to these individuals. Different considerations and requirements apply when armed groups are designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -81649,7 +81649,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1437, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: WHEN NO DDR PROGRAMME IS IN PLACE \\n When the preconditions for a DDR programme do not exist, combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups may still decide to leave armed forces and groups, either individually or in small groups. Individuals leave armed forces and groups for many different reasons. Some become tired of life as a combatant, while others are sick or wounded and can no longer continue to fight. Some leave because they are disillusioned with the goals of the group, they see greater benefit in civilian life or they believe they have won. \\n In some circumstances, States also encourage this type of voluntary exit by offering safe pathways out of the group, either to push those who remain towards negotiated settlement or to deplete the military capacity of these groups in order to render them more vulnerable to defeat. These individuals might report to an amnesty commission or to State institutions that will formally recognize their transition to civilian status. Those who transition to civilian status in this way may be eligible to receive assistance through DDR-related tools such as community violence reduction initiatives and\/or to be provided with reintegration support (see IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR). Transitional assistance (similar to reinsertion as part of a DDR programme) may also be provided to these individuals. Different considerations and requirements apply when armed groups are designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: WHEN NO DDR PROGRAMME IS IN PLACE \n When the preconditions for a DDR programme do not exist, combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups may still decide to leave armed forces and groups, either individually or in small groups. Individuals leave armed forces and groups for many different reasons. Some become tired of life as a combatant, while others are sick or wounded and can no longer continue to fight. Some leave because they are disillusioned with the goals of the group, they see greater benefit in civilian life or they believe they have won. \n In some circumstances, States also encourage this type of voluntary exit by offering safe pathways out of the group, either to push those who remain towards negotiated settlement or to deplete the military capacity of these groups in order to render them more vulnerable to defeat. These individuals might report to an amnesty commission or to State institutions that will formally recognize their transition to civilian status. Those who transition to civilian status in this way may be eligible to receive assistance through DDR-related tools such as community violence reduction initiatives and\/or to be provided with reintegration support (see IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR). Transitional assistance (similar to reinsertion as part of a DDR programme) may also be provided to these individuals. Different considerations and requirements apply when armed groups are designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -81667,7 +81667,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1437, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: WHEN NO DDR PROGRAMME IS IN PLACE \\n When the preconditions for a DDR programme do not exist, combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups may still decide to leave armed forces and groups, either individually or in small groups. Individuals leave armed forces and groups for many different reasons. Some become tired of life as a combatant, while others are sick or wounded and can no longer continue to fight. Some leave because they are disillusioned with the goals of the group, they see greater benefit in civilian life or they believe they have won. \\n In some circumstances, States also encourage this type of voluntary exit by offering safe pathways out of the group, either to push those who remain towards negotiated settlement or to deplete the military capacity of these groups in order to render them more vulnerable to defeat. These individuals might report to an amnesty commission or to State institutions that will formally recognize their transition to civilian status. Those who transition to civilian status in this way may be eligible to receive assistance through DDR-related tools such as community violence reduction initiatives and\/or to be provided with reintegration support (see IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR). Transitional assistance (similar to reinsertion as part of a DDR programme) may also be provided to these individuals. Different considerations and requirements apply when armed groups are designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: WHEN NO DDR PROGRAMME IS IN PLACE \n When the preconditions for a DDR programme do not exist, combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups may still decide to leave armed forces and groups, either individually or in small groups. Individuals leave armed forces and groups for many different reasons. Some become tired of life as a combatant, while others are sick or wounded and can no longer continue to fight. Some leave because they are disillusioned with the goals of the group, they see greater benefit in civilian life or they believe they have won. \n In some circumstances, States also encourage this type of voluntary exit by offering safe pathways out of the group, either to push those who remain towards negotiated settlement or to deplete the military capacity of these groups in order to render them more vulnerable to defeat. These individuals might report to an amnesty commission or to State institutions that will formally recognize their transition to civilian status. Those who transition to civilian status in this way may be eligible to receive assistance through DDR-related tools such as community violence reduction initiatives and\/or to be provided with reintegration support (see IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR). Transitional assistance (similar to reinsertion as part of a DDR programme) may also be provided to these individuals. Different considerations and requirements apply when armed groups are designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -81685,7 +81685,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1437, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: WHEN NO DDR PROGRAMME IS IN PLACE \\n When the preconditions for a DDR programme do not exist, combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups may still decide to leave armed forces and groups, either individually or in small groups. Individuals leave armed forces and groups for many different reasons. Some become tired of life as a combatant, while others are sick or wounded and can no longer continue to fight. Some leave because they are disillusioned with the goals of the group, they see greater benefit in civilian life or they believe they have won. \\n In some circumstances, States also encourage this type of voluntary exit by offering safe pathways out of the group, either to push those who remain towards negotiated settlement or to deplete the military capacity of these groups in order to render them more vulnerable to defeat. These individuals might report to an amnesty commission or to State institutions that will formally recognize their transition to civilian status. Those who transition to civilian status in this way may be eligible to receive assistance through DDR-related tools such as community violence reduction initiatives and\/or to be provided with reintegration support (see IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR). Transitional assistance (similar to reinsertion as part of a DDR programme) may also be provided to these individuals. Different considerations and requirements apply when armed groups are designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: WHEN NO DDR PROGRAMME IS IN PLACE \n When the preconditions for a DDR programme do not exist, combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups may still decide to leave armed forces and groups, either individually or in small groups. Individuals leave armed forces and groups for many different reasons. Some become tired of life as a combatant, while others are sick or wounded and can no longer continue to fight. Some leave because they are disillusioned with the goals of the group, they see greater benefit in civilian life or they believe they have won. \n In some circumstances, States also encourage this type of voluntary exit by offering safe pathways out of the group, either to push those who remain towards negotiated settlement or to deplete the military capacity of these groups in order to render them more vulnerable to defeat. These individuals might report to an amnesty commission or to State institutions that will formally recognize their transition to civilian status. Those who transition to civilian status in this way may be eligible to receive assistance through DDR-related tools such as community violence reduction initiatives and\/or to be provided with reintegration support (see IDDRS 2.10 on The UN Approach to DDR). Transitional assistance (similar to reinsertion as part of a DDR programme) may also be provided to these individuals. Different considerations and requirements apply when armed groups are designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -82585,7 +82585,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1460, - "Paragraph": "In addition to these assessments, planning for reinsertion should be informed by an analysis of the preferences and needs of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups. These immediate needs may be wide-ranging and include food, clothes, health care, psychosocial support, children\u2019s education, shelter, agricultural tools and other materials needed to earn a livelihood. The profiling exercises undertaken at demobilization sites (see section 6.3) may allow for the tailoring of reinsertion and reintegration assistance \u2013 i.e., matching individual needs to the reinsertion options on offer. However, profiling undertaken at demobilization sites will likely occur too late for reinsertion planning purposes. For these reasons, the following assessments should be conducted as early as possible, before demobilization gets underway: \\n An analysis of the needs and preferences of ex-combatants and associated persons; \\n Market analysis; \\n A review of the local economy\u2019s capacity to absorb cash inflation (if cash-based transfers are being considered); \\n Gender analysis; \\n Feasibility studies; and \\n Assessments of the capacity of potential implementing partners.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to these assessments, planning for reinsertion should be informed by an analysis of the preferences and needs of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups. These immediate needs may be wide-ranging and include food, clothes, health care, psychosocial support, children\u2019s education, shelter, agricultural tools and other materials needed to earn a livelihood. The profiling exercises undertaken at demobilization sites (see section 6.3) may allow for the tailoring of reinsertion and reintegration assistance \u2013 i.e., matching individual needs to the reinsertion options on offer. However, profiling undertaken at demobilization sites will likely occur too late for reinsertion planning purposes. For these reasons, the following assessments should be conducted as early as possible, before demobilization gets underway: \n An analysis of the needs and preferences of ex-combatants and associated persons; \n Market analysis; \n A review of the local economy\u2019s capacity to absorb cash inflation (if cash-based transfers are being considered); \n Gender analysis; \n Feasibility studies; and \n Assessments of the capacity of potential implementing partners.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -82603,7 +82603,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1460, - "Paragraph": "In addition to these assessments, planning for reinsertion should be informed by an analysis of the preferences and needs of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups. These immediate needs may be wide-ranging and include food, clothes, health care, psychosocial support, children\u2019s education, shelter, agricultural tools and other materials needed to earn a livelihood. The profiling exercises undertaken at demobilization sites (see section 6.3) may allow for the tailoring of reinsertion and reintegration assistance \u2013 i.e., matching individual needs to the reinsertion options on offer. However, profiling undertaken at demobilization sites will likely occur too late for reinsertion planning purposes. For these reasons, the following assessments should be conducted as early as possible, before demobilization gets underway: \\n An analysis of the needs and preferences of ex-combatants and associated persons; \\n Market analysis; \\n A review of the local economy\u2019s capacity to absorb cash inflation (if cash-based transfers are being considered); \\n Gender analysis; \\n Feasibility studies; and \\n Assessments of the capacity of potential implementing partners.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to these assessments, planning for reinsertion should be informed by an analysis of the preferences and needs of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups. These immediate needs may be wide-ranging and include food, clothes, health care, psychosocial support, children\u2019s education, shelter, agricultural tools and other materials needed to earn a livelihood. The profiling exercises undertaken at demobilization sites (see section 6.3) may allow for the tailoring of reinsertion and reintegration assistance \u2013 i.e., matching individual needs to the reinsertion options on offer. However, profiling undertaken at demobilization sites will likely occur too late for reinsertion planning purposes. For these reasons, the following assessments should be conducted as early as possible, before demobilization gets underway: \n An analysis of the needs and preferences of ex-combatants and associated persons; \n Market analysis; \n A review of the local economy\u2019s capacity to absorb cash inflation (if cash-based transfers are being considered); \n Gender analysis; \n Feasibility studies; and \n Assessments of the capacity of potential implementing partners.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -82621,7 +82621,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1460, - "Paragraph": "In addition to these assessments, planning for reinsertion should be informed by an analysis of the preferences and needs of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups. These immediate needs may be wide-ranging and include food, clothes, health care, psychosocial support, children\u2019s education, shelter, agricultural tools and other materials needed to earn a livelihood. The profiling exercises undertaken at demobilization sites (see section 6.3) may allow for the tailoring of reinsertion and reintegration assistance \u2013 i.e., matching individual needs to the reinsertion options on offer. However, profiling undertaken at demobilization sites will likely occur too late for reinsertion planning purposes. For these reasons, the following assessments should be conducted as early as possible, before demobilization gets underway: \\n An analysis of the needs and preferences of ex-combatants and associated persons; \\n Market analysis; \\n A review of the local economy\u2019s capacity to absorb cash inflation (if cash-based transfers are being considered); \\n Gender analysis; \\n Feasibility studies; and \\n Assessments of the capacity of potential implementing partners.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to these assessments, planning for reinsertion should be informed by an analysis of the preferences and needs of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups. These immediate needs may be wide-ranging and include food, clothes, health care, psychosocial support, children\u2019s education, shelter, agricultural tools and other materials needed to earn a livelihood. The profiling exercises undertaken at demobilization sites (see section 6.3) may allow for the tailoring of reinsertion and reintegration assistance \u2013 i.e., matching individual needs to the reinsertion options on offer. However, profiling undertaken at demobilization sites will likely occur too late for reinsertion planning purposes. For these reasons, the following assessments should be conducted as early as possible, before demobilization gets underway: \n An analysis of the needs and preferences of ex-combatants and associated persons; \n Market analysis; \n A review of the local economy\u2019s capacity to absorb cash inflation (if cash-based transfers are being considered); \n Gender analysis; \n Feasibility studies; and \n Assessments of the capacity of potential implementing partners.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -82639,7 +82639,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1460, - "Paragraph": "In addition to these assessments, planning for reinsertion should be informed by an analysis of the preferences and needs of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups. These immediate needs may be wide-ranging and include food, clothes, health care, psychosocial support, children\u2019s education, shelter, agricultural tools and other materials needed to earn a livelihood. The profiling exercises undertaken at demobilization sites (see section 6.3) may allow for the tailoring of reinsertion and reintegration assistance \u2013 i.e., matching individual needs to the reinsertion options on offer. However, profiling undertaken at demobilization sites will likely occur too late for reinsertion planning purposes. For these reasons, the following assessments should be conducted as early as possible, before demobilization gets underway: \\n An analysis of the needs and preferences of ex-combatants and associated persons; \\n Market analysis; \\n A review of the local economy\u2019s capacity to absorb cash inflation (if cash-based transfers are being considered); \\n Gender analysis; \\n Feasibility studies; and \\n Assessments of the capacity of potential implementing partners.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to these assessments, planning for reinsertion should be informed by an analysis of the preferences and needs of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups. These immediate needs may be wide-ranging and include food, clothes, health care, psychosocial support, children\u2019s education, shelter, agricultural tools and other materials needed to earn a livelihood. The profiling exercises undertaken at demobilization sites (see section 6.3) may allow for the tailoring of reinsertion and reintegration assistance \u2013 i.e., matching individual needs to the reinsertion options on offer. However, profiling undertaken at demobilization sites will likely occur too late for reinsertion planning purposes. For these reasons, the following assessments should be conducted as early as possible, before demobilization gets underway: \n An analysis of the needs and preferences of ex-combatants and associated persons; \n Market analysis; \n A review of the local economy\u2019s capacity to absorb cash inflation (if cash-based transfers are being considered); \n Gender analysis; \n Feasibility studies; and \n Assessments of the capacity of potential implementing partners.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -82657,7 +82657,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1460, - "Paragraph": "In addition to these assessments, planning for reinsertion should be informed by an analysis of the preferences and needs of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups. These immediate needs may be wide-ranging and include food, clothes, health care, psychosocial support, children\u2019s education, shelter, agricultural tools and other materials needed to earn a livelihood. The profiling exercises undertaken at demobilization sites (see section 6.3) may allow for the tailoring of reinsertion and reintegration assistance \u2013 i.e., matching individual needs to the reinsertion options on offer. However, profiling undertaken at demobilization sites will likely occur too late for reinsertion planning purposes. For these reasons, the following assessments should be conducted as early as possible, before demobilization gets underway: \\n An analysis of the needs and preferences of ex-combatants and associated persons; \\n Market analysis; \\n A review of the local economy\u2019s capacity to absorb cash inflation (if cash-based transfers are being considered); \\n Gender analysis; \\n Feasibility studies; and \\n Assessments of the capacity of potential implementing partners.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to these assessments, planning for reinsertion should be informed by an analysis of the preferences and needs of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups. These immediate needs may be wide-ranging and include food, clothes, health care, psychosocial support, children\u2019s education, shelter, agricultural tools and other materials needed to earn a livelihood. The profiling exercises undertaken at demobilization sites (see section 6.3) may allow for the tailoring of reinsertion and reintegration assistance \u2013 i.e., matching individual needs to the reinsertion options on offer. However, profiling undertaken at demobilization sites will likely occur too late for reinsertion planning purposes. For these reasons, the following assessments should be conducted as early as possible, before demobilization gets underway: \n An analysis of the needs and preferences of ex-combatants and associated persons; \n Market analysis; \n A review of the local economy\u2019s capacity to absorb cash inflation (if cash-based transfers are being considered); \n Gender analysis; \n Feasibility studies; and \n Assessments of the capacity of potential implementing partners.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -82668,7 +82668,7 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Information collection", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "For these reasons, the following assessments should be conducted as early as possible, before demobilization gets underway: \\n An analysis of the needs and preferences of ex-combatants and associated persons; \\n Market analysis; \\n A review of the local economy\u2019s capacity to absorb cash inflation (if cash-based transfers are being considered); \\n Gender analysis; \\n Feasibility studies; and \\n Assessments of the capacity of potential implementing partners.", + "Sentence": "For these reasons, the following assessments should be conducted as early as possible, before demobilization gets underway: \n An analysis of the needs and preferences of ex-combatants and associated persons; \n Market analysis; \n A review of the local economy\u2019s capacity to absorb cash inflation (if cash-based transfers are being considered); \n Gender analysis; \n Feasibility studies; and \n Assessments of the capacity of potential implementing partners.", "newParagraph": "addition assessment planning reinsertion informed analysis preference need excombatants person formerly associated armed force group immediate need may wideranging include food clothes health care psychosocial support child education shelter agricultural tool material needed earn livelihood profiling exercise undertaken demobilization site see section 63 may allow tailoring reinsertion reintegration assistance ie matching individual need reinsertion option offer however profiling undertaken demobilization site likely occur late reinsertion planning purpose reason following assessment conducted early possible demobilization get underway n analysis need preference excombatants associated person n market analysis n review local economy capacity absorb cash inflation cashbased transfer considered n gender analysis n feasibility study n assessment capacity potential implementing partner", "ProcessedSent": "reason following assessment conducted early possible demobilization get underway n analysis need preference excombatants associated person n market analysis n review local economy capacity absorb cash inflation cashbased transfer considered n gender analysis n feasibility study n assessment capacity potential implementing partner", "SentID": 4592 @@ -82873,7 +82873,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1463, - "Paragraph": "BOX 2: TYPOLOGY OF FEMALE PARTICIPANTS AND BENEFICIARIES \\n Female combatants: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts as active combatants using arms. \\n Female supporters\/females associated with armed forces and groups: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts in support roles, whether by force or voluntarily. Rather than being members of a civilian community, they are economically and socially dependent on the armed force or group for their income and social support (examples: porters, cooks, nurses, spies, administrators, translators, radio operators, medical assistants, public information officers, camp leaders, sex workers\/slaves). \\n Female dependants: Women and girls who are part of ex-combatants\u2019 households. They are mainly socially and financially dependent on ex-combatants, although they may also have kept other community ties (examples: wives\/war wives, children, mothers\/parents, female siblings, female members of the extended family). \\n\\n There are different requirements for armed groups designated as terrorist organizations, including for women and girls who have traveled to a conflict zone to join a designated terrorist organization (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", + "Paragraph": "BOX 2: TYPOLOGY OF FEMALE PARTICIPANTS AND BENEFICIARIES \n Female combatants: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts as active combatants using arms. \n Female supporters\/females associated with armed forces and groups: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts in support roles, whether by force or voluntarily. Rather than being members of a civilian community, they are economically and socially dependent on the armed force or group for their income and social support (examples: porters, cooks, nurses, spies, administrators, translators, radio operators, medical assistants, public information officers, camp leaders, sex workers\/slaves). \n Female dependants: Women and girls who are part of ex-combatants\u2019 households. They are mainly socially and financially dependent on ex-combatants, although they may also have kept other community ties (examples: wives\/war wives, children, mothers\/parents, female siblings, female members of the extended family). \n\n There are different requirements for armed groups designated as terrorist organizations, including for women and girls who have traveled to a conflict zone to join a designated terrorist organization (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -82884,14 +82884,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2 Eligibility criteria", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "BOX 2: TYPOLOGY OF FEMALE PARTICIPANTS AND BENEFICIARIES \\n Female combatants: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts as active combatants using arms.", + "Sentence": "BOX 2: TYPOLOGY OF FEMALE PARTICIPANTS AND BENEFICIARIES \n Female combatants: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts as active combatants using arms.", "newParagraph": "box 2 typology female participant beneficiary n female combatant woman girl participated armed conflict active combatant using arm n female supportersfemales associated armed force group woman girl participated armed conflict support role whether force voluntarily rather member civilian community economically socially dependent armed force group income social support example porter cook nurse spy administrator translator radio operator medical assistant public information officer camp leader sex workersslaves n female dependant woman girl part excombatants household mainly socially financially dependent excombatants although may also kept community tie example wiveswar wife child mothersparents female sibling female member extended family nn different requirement armed group designated terrorist organization including woman girl traveled conflict zone join designated terrorist organization see iddrs 211 legal framework un ddr", "ProcessedSent": "box 2 typology female participant beneficiary n female combatant woman girl participated armed conflict active combatant using arm", "SentID": 4604 }, { "ParagraphID": 1463, - "Paragraph": "BOX 2: TYPOLOGY OF FEMALE PARTICIPANTS AND BENEFICIARIES \\n Female combatants: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts as active combatants using arms. \\n Female supporters\/females associated with armed forces and groups: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts in support roles, whether by force or voluntarily. Rather than being members of a civilian community, they are economically and socially dependent on the armed force or group for their income and social support (examples: porters, cooks, nurses, spies, administrators, translators, radio operators, medical assistants, public information officers, camp leaders, sex workers\/slaves). \\n Female dependants: Women and girls who are part of ex-combatants\u2019 households. They are mainly socially and financially dependent on ex-combatants, although they may also have kept other community ties (examples: wives\/war wives, children, mothers\/parents, female siblings, female members of the extended family). \\n\\n There are different requirements for armed groups designated as terrorist organizations, including for women and girls who have traveled to a conflict zone to join a designated terrorist organization (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", + "Paragraph": "BOX 2: TYPOLOGY OF FEMALE PARTICIPANTS AND BENEFICIARIES \n Female combatants: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts as active combatants using arms. \n Female supporters\/females associated with armed forces and groups: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts in support roles, whether by force or voluntarily. Rather than being members of a civilian community, they are economically and socially dependent on the armed force or group for their income and social support (examples: porters, cooks, nurses, spies, administrators, translators, radio operators, medical assistants, public information officers, camp leaders, sex workers\/slaves). \n Female dependants: Women and girls who are part of ex-combatants\u2019 households. They are mainly socially and financially dependent on ex-combatants, although they may also have kept other community ties (examples: wives\/war wives, children, mothers\/parents, female siblings, female members of the extended family). \n\n There are different requirements for armed groups designated as terrorist organizations, including for women and girls who have traveled to a conflict zone to join a designated terrorist organization (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -82902,14 +82902,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2 Eligibility criteria", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Female supporters\/females associated with armed forces and groups: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts in support roles, whether by force or voluntarily.", + "Sentence": "\n Female supporters\/females associated with armed forces and groups: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts in support roles, whether by force or voluntarily.", "newParagraph": "box 2 typology female participant beneficiary n female combatant woman girl participated armed conflict active combatant using arm n female supportersfemales associated armed force group woman girl participated armed conflict support role whether force voluntarily rather member civilian community economically socially dependent armed force group income social support example porter cook nurse spy administrator translator radio operator medical assistant public information officer camp leader sex workersslaves n female dependant woman girl part excombatants household mainly socially financially dependent excombatants although may also kept community tie example wiveswar wife child mothersparents female sibling female member extended family nn different requirement armed group designated terrorist organization including woman girl traveled conflict zone join designated terrorist organization see iddrs 211 legal framework un ddr", "ProcessedSent": "n female supportersfemales associated armed force group woman girl participated armed conflict support role whether force voluntarily", "SentID": 4605 }, { "ParagraphID": 1463, - "Paragraph": "BOX 2: TYPOLOGY OF FEMALE PARTICIPANTS AND BENEFICIARIES \\n Female combatants: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts as active combatants using arms. \\n Female supporters\/females associated with armed forces and groups: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts in support roles, whether by force or voluntarily. Rather than being members of a civilian community, they are economically and socially dependent on the armed force or group for their income and social support (examples: porters, cooks, nurses, spies, administrators, translators, radio operators, medical assistants, public information officers, camp leaders, sex workers\/slaves). \\n Female dependants: Women and girls who are part of ex-combatants\u2019 households. They are mainly socially and financially dependent on ex-combatants, although they may also have kept other community ties (examples: wives\/war wives, children, mothers\/parents, female siblings, female members of the extended family). \\n\\n There are different requirements for armed groups designated as terrorist organizations, including for women and girls who have traveled to a conflict zone to join a designated terrorist organization (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", + "Paragraph": "BOX 2: TYPOLOGY OF FEMALE PARTICIPANTS AND BENEFICIARIES \n Female combatants: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts as active combatants using arms. \n Female supporters\/females associated with armed forces and groups: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts in support roles, whether by force or voluntarily. Rather than being members of a civilian community, they are economically and socially dependent on the armed force or group for their income and social support (examples: porters, cooks, nurses, spies, administrators, translators, radio operators, medical assistants, public information officers, camp leaders, sex workers\/slaves). \n Female dependants: Women and girls who are part of ex-combatants\u2019 households. They are mainly socially and financially dependent on ex-combatants, although they may also have kept other community ties (examples: wives\/war wives, children, mothers\/parents, female siblings, female members of the extended family). \n\n There are different requirements for armed groups designated as terrorist organizations, including for women and girls who have traveled to a conflict zone to join a designated terrorist organization (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -82927,7 +82927,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1463, - "Paragraph": "BOX 2: TYPOLOGY OF FEMALE PARTICIPANTS AND BENEFICIARIES \\n Female combatants: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts as active combatants using arms. \\n Female supporters\/females associated with armed forces and groups: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts in support roles, whether by force or voluntarily. Rather than being members of a civilian community, they are economically and socially dependent on the armed force or group for their income and social support (examples: porters, cooks, nurses, spies, administrators, translators, radio operators, medical assistants, public information officers, camp leaders, sex workers\/slaves). \\n Female dependants: Women and girls who are part of ex-combatants\u2019 households. They are mainly socially and financially dependent on ex-combatants, although they may also have kept other community ties (examples: wives\/war wives, children, mothers\/parents, female siblings, female members of the extended family). \\n\\n There are different requirements for armed groups designated as terrorist organizations, including for women and girls who have traveled to a conflict zone to join a designated terrorist organization (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", + "Paragraph": "BOX 2: TYPOLOGY OF FEMALE PARTICIPANTS AND BENEFICIARIES \n Female combatants: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts as active combatants using arms. \n Female supporters\/females associated with armed forces and groups: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts in support roles, whether by force or voluntarily. Rather than being members of a civilian community, they are economically and socially dependent on the armed force or group for their income and social support (examples: porters, cooks, nurses, spies, administrators, translators, radio operators, medical assistants, public information officers, camp leaders, sex workers\/slaves). \n Female dependants: Women and girls who are part of ex-combatants\u2019 households. They are mainly socially and financially dependent on ex-combatants, although they may also have kept other community ties (examples: wives\/war wives, children, mothers\/parents, female siblings, female members of the extended family). \n\n There are different requirements for armed groups designated as terrorist organizations, including for women and girls who have traveled to a conflict zone to join a designated terrorist organization (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -82938,14 +82938,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2 Eligibility criteria", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Female dependants: Women and girls who are part of ex-combatants\u2019 households.", + "Sentence": "\n Female dependants: Women and girls who are part of ex-combatants\u2019 households.", "newParagraph": "box 2 typology female participant beneficiary n female combatant woman girl participated armed conflict active combatant using arm n female supportersfemales associated armed force group woman girl participated armed conflict support role whether force voluntarily rather member civilian community economically socially dependent armed force group income social support example porter cook nurse spy administrator translator radio operator medical assistant public information officer camp leader sex workersslaves n female dependant woman girl part excombatants household mainly socially financially dependent excombatants although may also kept community tie example wiveswar wife child mothersparents female sibling female member extended family nn different requirement armed group designated terrorist organization including woman girl traveled conflict zone join designated terrorist organization see iddrs 211 legal framework un ddr", "ProcessedSent": "n female dependant woman girl part excombatants household", "SentID": 4607 }, { "ParagraphID": 1463, - "Paragraph": "BOX 2: TYPOLOGY OF FEMALE PARTICIPANTS AND BENEFICIARIES \\n Female combatants: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts as active combatants using arms. \\n Female supporters\/females associated with armed forces and groups: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts in support roles, whether by force or voluntarily. Rather than being members of a civilian community, they are economically and socially dependent on the armed force or group for their income and social support (examples: porters, cooks, nurses, spies, administrators, translators, radio operators, medical assistants, public information officers, camp leaders, sex workers\/slaves). \\n Female dependants: Women and girls who are part of ex-combatants\u2019 households. They are mainly socially and financially dependent on ex-combatants, although they may also have kept other community ties (examples: wives\/war wives, children, mothers\/parents, female siblings, female members of the extended family). \\n\\n There are different requirements for armed groups designated as terrorist organizations, including for women and girls who have traveled to a conflict zone to join a designated terrorist organization (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", + "Paragraph": "BOX 2: TYPOLOGY OF FEMALE PARTICIPANTS AND BENEFICIARIES \n Female combatants: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts as active combatants using arms. \n Female supporters\/females associated with armed forces and groups: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts in support roles, whether by force or voluntarily. Rather than being members of a civilian community, they are economically and socially dependent on the armed force or group for their income and social support (examples: porters, cooks, nurses, spies, administrators, translators, radio operators, medical assistants, public information officers, camp leaders, sex workers\/slaves). \n Female dependants: Women and girls who are part of ex-combatants\u2019 households. They are mainly socially and financially dependent on ex-combatants, although they may also have kept other community ties (examples: wives\/war wives, children, mothers\/parents, female siblings, female members of the extended family). \n\n There are different requirements for armed groups designated as terrorist organizations, including for women and girls who have traveled to a conflict zone to join a designated terrorist organization (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -82963,7 +82963,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1463, - "Paragraph": "BOX 2: TYPOLOGY OF FEMALE PARTICIPANTS AND BENEFICIARIES \\n Female combatants: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts as active combatants using arms. \\n Female supporters\/females associated with armed forces and groups: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts in support roles, whether by force or voluntarily. Rather than being members of a civilian community, they are economically and socially dependent on the armed force or group for their income and social support (examples: porters, cooks, nurses, spies, administrators, translators, radio operators, medical assistants, public information officers, camp leaders, sex workers\/slaves). \\n Female dependants: Women and girls who are part of ex-combatants\u2019 households. They are mainly socially and financially dependent on ex-combatants, although they may also have kept other community ties (examples: wives\/war wives, children, mothers\/parents, female siblings, female members of the extended family). \\n\\n There are different requirements for armed groups designated as terrorist organizations, including for women and girls who have traveled to a conflict zone to join a designated terrorist organization (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", + "Paragraph": "BOX 2: TYPOLOGY OF FEMALE PARTICIPANTS AND BENEFICIARIES \n Female combatants: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts as active combatants using arms. \n Female supporters\/females associated with armed forces and groups: Women and girls who participated in armed conflicts in support roles, whether by force or voluntarily. Rather than being members of a civilian community, they are economically and socially dependent on the armed force or group for their income and social support (examples: porters, cooks, nurses, spies, administrators, translators, radio operators, medical assistants, public information officers, camp leaders, sex workers\/slaves). \n Female dependants: Women and girls who are part of ex-combatants\u2019 households. They are mainly socially and financially dependent on ex-combatants, although they may also have kept other community ties (examples: wives\/war wives, children, mothers\/parents, female siblings, female members of the extended family). \n\n There are different requirements for armed groups designated as terrorist organizations, including for women and girls who have traveled to a conflict zone to join a designated terrorist organization (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -82974,7 +82974,7 @@ "Heading2": "5.2 Eligibility criteria", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n There are different requirements for armed groups designated as terrorist organizations, including for women and girls who have traveled to a conflict zone to join a designated terrorist organization (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", + "Sentence": "\n\n There are different requirements for armed groups designated as terrorist organizations, including for women and girls who have traveled to a conflict zone to join a designated terrorist organization (see IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR).", "newParagraph": "box 2 typology female participant beneficiary n female combatant woman girl participated armed conflict active combatant using arm n female supportersfemales associated armed force group woman girl participated armed conflict support role whether force voluntarily rather member civilian community economically socially dependent armed force group income social support example porter cook nurse spy administrator translator radio operator medical assistant public information officer camp leader sex workersslaves n female dependant woman girl part excombatants household mainly socially financially dependent excombatants although may also kept community tie example wiveswar wife child mothersparents female sibling female member extended family nn different requirement armed group designated terrorist organization including woman girl traveled conflict zone join designated terrorist organization see iddrs 211 legal framework un ddr", "ProcessedSent": "nn different requirement armed group designated terrorist organization including woman girl traveled conflict zone join designated terrorist organization see iddrs 211 legal framework un ddr", "SentID": 4609 @@ -83341,7 +83341,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1469, - "Paragraph": "BOX 3: WHICH TYPE OF DEMOBILIZATION SITE \\n\\n When choosing which type of demobilization site is most appropriate, DDR practitioners shall consider: \\n Do the peace agreement and\/or national DDR policy document contain references to demobilization sites? \\n Are both male and female combatants already in the communities where they will reintegrate? \\n Will the demobilization process consist of formed military units reporting with their commanders, or individual combatants leaving active armed groups? \\n What approach is being taken in other components of the DDR process \u2013 for example, is disarmament being undertaken at a mobile or static site? (See IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament.) \\n Will cantonment play an important confidence-building role in the peace process? \\n What does the context tell you about the potential security threat to those who demobilize? Are active armed groups likely to retaliate against former members who opt to demobilize? \\n Can reception, disarmament and demobilization take place at the same site? \\n Can existing sites be used? Do they require refurbishment? \\n Will there be enough resources to build semi-permanent demobilization sites? How long will the construction process take? \\n What are the potential risks of cantoning any one of the groups?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 3: WHICH TYPE OF DEMOBILIZATION SITE \n\n When choosing which type of demobilization site is most appropriate, DDR practitioners shall consider: \n Do the peace agreement and\/or national DDR policy document contain references to demobilization sites? \n Are both male and female combatants already in the communities where they will reintegrate? \n Will the demobilization process consist of formed military units reporting with their commanders, or individual combatants leaving active armed groups? \n What approach is being taken in other components of the DDR process \u2013 for example, is disarmament being undertaken at a mobile or static site? (See IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament.) \n Will cantonment play an important confidence-building role in the peace process? \n What does the context tell you about the potential security threat to those who demobilize? Are active armed groups likely to retaliate against former members who opt to demobilize? \n Can reception, disarmament and demobilization take place at the same site? \n Can existing sites be used? Do they require refurbishment? \n Will there be enough resources to build semi-permanent demobilization sites? How long will the construction process take? \n What are the potential risks of cantoning any one of the groups?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -83352,14 +83352,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Demobilization sites", "Heading3": "5.3.2 Temporary demobilization sites", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "BOX 3: WHICH TYPE OF DEMOBILIZATION SITE \\n\\n When choosing which type of demobilization site is most appropriate, DDR practitioners shall consider: \\n Do the peace agreement and\/or national DDR policy document contain references to demobilization sites?", + "Sentence": "BOX 3: WHICH TYPE OF DEMOBILIZATION SITE \n\n When choosing which type of demobilization site is most appropriate, DDR practitioners shall consider: \n Do the peace agreement and\/or national DDR policy document contain references to demobilization sites?", "newParagraph": "box 3 type demobilization site nn choosing type demobilization site appropriate ddr practitioner shall consider n peace agreement andor national ddr policy document contain reference demobilization site n male female combatant already community reintegrate n demobilization process consist formed military unit reporting commander individual combatant leaving active armed group n approach taken component ddr process example disarmament undertaken mobile static site see iddrs 410 disarmament n cantonment play important confidencebuilding role peace process n context tell potential security threat demobilize active armed group likely retaliate former member opt demobilize n reception disarmament demobilization take place site n existing site used require refurbishment n enough resource build semipermanent demobilization site long construction process take n potential risk cantoning one group", "ProcessedSent": "box 3 type demobilization site nn choosing type demobilization site appropriate ddr practitioner shall consider n peace agreement andor national ddr policy document contain reference demobilization site", "SentID": 4630 }, { "ParagraphID": 1469, - "Paragraph": "BOX 3: WHICH TYPE OF DEMOBILIZATION SITE \\n\\n When choosing which type of demobilization site is most appropriate, DDR practitioners shall consider: \\n Do the peace agreement and\/or national DDR policy document contain references to demobilization sites? \\n Are both male and female combatants already in the communities where they will reintegrate? \\n Will the demobilization process consist of formed military units reporting with their commanders, or individual combatants leaving active armed groups? \\n What approach is being taken in other components of the DDR process \u2013 for example, is disarmament being undertaken at a mobile or static site? (See IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament.) \\n Will cantonment play an important confidence-building role in the peace process? \\n What does the context tell you about the potential security threat to those who demobilize? Are active armed groups likely to retaliate against former members who opt to demobilize? \\n Can reception, disarmament and demobilization take place at the same site? \\n Can existing sites be used? Do they require refurbishment? \\n Will there be enough resources to build semi-permanent demobilization sites? How long will the construction process take? \\n What are the potential risks of cantoning any one of the groups?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 3: WHICH TYPE OF DEMOBILIZATION SITE \n\n When choosing which type of demobilization site is most appropriate, DDR practitioners shall consider: \n Do the peace agreement and\/or national DDR policy document contain references to demobilization sites? \n Are both male and female combatants already in the communities where they will reintegrate? \n Will the demobilization process consist of formed military units reporting with their commanders, or individual combatants leaving active armed groups? \n What approach is being taken in other components of the DDR process \u2013 for example, is disarmament being undertaken at a mobile or static site? (See IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament.) \n Will cantonment play an important confidence-building role in the peace process? \n What does the context tell you about the potential security threat to those who demobilize? Are active armed groups likely to retaliate against former members who opt to demobilize? \n Can reception, disarmament and demobilization take place at the same site? \n Can existing sites be used? Do they require refurbishment? \n Will there be enough resources to build semi-permanent demobilization sites? How long will the construction process take? \n What are the potential risks of cantoning any one of the groups?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -83370,14 +83370,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Demobilization sites", "Heading3": "5.3.2 Temporary demobilization sites", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Are both male and female combatants already in the communities where they will reintegrate?", + "Sentence": "\n Are both male and female combatants already in the communities where they will reintegrate?", "newParagraph": "box 3 type demobilization site nn choosing type demobilization site appropriate ddr practitioner shall consider n peace agreement andor national ddr policy document contain reference demobilization site n male female combatant already community reintegrate n demobilization process consist formed military unit reporting commander individual combatant leaving active armed group n approach taken component ddr process example disarmament undertaken mobile static site see iddrs 410 disarmament n cantonment play important confidencebuilding role peace process n context tell potential security threat demobilize active armed group likely retaliate former member opt demobilize n reception disarmament demobilization take place site n existing site used require refurbishment n enough resource build semipermanent demobilization site long construction process take n potential risk cantoning one group", "ProcessedSent": "n male female combatant already community reintegrate", "SentID": 4631 }, { "ParagraphID": 1469, - "Paragraph": "BOX 3: WHICH TYPE OF DEMOBILIZATION SITE \\n\\n When choosing which type of demobilization site is most appropriate, DDR practitioners shall consider: \\n Do the peace agreement and\/or national DDR policy document contain references to demobilization sites? \\n Are both male and female combatants already in the communities where they will reintegrate? \\n Will the demobilization process consist of formed military units reporting with their commanders, or individual combatants leaving active armed groups? \\n What approach is being taken in other components of the DDR process \u2013 for example, is disarmament being undertaken at a mobile or static site? (See IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament.) \\n Will cantonment play an important confidence-building role in the peace process? \\n What does the context tell you about the potential security threat to those who demobilize? Are active armed groups likely to retaliate against former members who opt to demobilize? \\n Can reception, disarmament and demobilization take place at the same site? \\n Can existing sites be used? Do they require refurbishment? \\n Will there be enough resources to build semi-permanent demobilization sites? How long will the construction process take? \\n What are the potential risks of cantoning any one of the groups?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 3: WHICH TYPE OF DEMOBILIZATION SITE \n\n When choosing which type of demobilization site is most appropriate, DDR practitioners shall consider: \n Do the peace agreement and\/or national DDR policy document contain references to demobilization sites? \n Are both male and female combatants already in the communities where they will reintegrate? \n Will the demobilization process consist of formed military units reporting with their commanders, or individual combatants leaving active armed groups? \n What approach is being taken in other components of the DDR process \u2013 for example, is disarmament being undertaken at a mobile or static site? (See IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament.) \n Will cantonment play an important confidence-building role in the peace process? \n What does the context tell you about the potential security threat to those who demobilize? Are active armed groups likely to retaliate against former members who opt to demobilize? \n Can reception, disarmament and demobilization take place at the same site? \n Can existing sites be used? Do they require refurbishment? \n Will there be enough resources to build semi-permanent demobilization sites? How long will the construction process take? \n What are the potential risks of cantoning any one of the groups?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -83388,14 +83388,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Demobilization sites", "Heading3": "5.3.2 Temporary demobilization sites", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Will the demobilization process consist of formed military units reporting with their commanders, or individual combatants leaving active armed groups?", + "Sentence": "\n Will the demobilization process consist of formed military units reporting with their commanders, or individual combatants leaving active armed groups?", "newParagraph": "box 3 type demobilization site nn choosing type demobilization site appropriate ddr practitioner shall consider n peace agreement andor national ddr policy document contain reference demobilization site n male female combatant already community reintegrate n demobilization process consist formed military unit reporting commander individual combatant leaving active armed group n approach taken component ddr process example disarmament undertaken mobile static site see iddrs 410 disarmament n cantonment play important confidencebuilding role peace process n context tell potential security threat demobilize active armed group likely retaliate former member opt demobilize n reception disarmament demobilization take place site n existing site used require refurbishment n enough resource build semipermanent demobilization site long construction process take n potential risk cantoning one group", "ProcessedSent": "n demobilization process consist formed military unit reporting commander individual combatant leaving active armed group", "SentID": 4632 }, { "ParagraphID": 1469, - "Paragraph": "BOX 3: WHICH TYPE OF DEMOBILIZATION SITE \\n\\n When choosing which type of demobilization site is most appropriate, DDR practitioners shall consider: \\n Do the peace agreement and\/or national DDR policy document contain references to demobilization sites? \\n Are both male and female combatants already in the communities where they will reintegrate? \\n Will the demobilization process consist of formed military units reporting with their commanders, or individual combatants leaving active armed groups? \\n What approach is being taken in other components of the DDR process \u2013 for example, is disarmament being undertaken at a mobile or static site? (See IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament.) \\n Will cantonment play an important confidence-building role in the peace process? \\n What does the context tell you about the potential security threat to those who demobilize? Are active armed groups likely to retaliate against former members who opt to demobilize? \\n Can reception, disarmament and demobilization take place at the same site? \\n Can existing sites be used? Do they require refurbishment? \\n Will there be enough resources to build semi-permanent demobilization sites? How long will the construction process take? \\n What are the potential risks of cantoning any one of the groups?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 3: WHICH TYPE OF DEMOBILIZATION SITE \n\n When choosing which type of demobilization site is most appropriate, DDR practitioners shall consider: \n Do the peace agreement and\/or national DDR policy document contain references to demobilization sites? \n Are both male and female combatants already in the communities where they will reintegrate? \n Will the demobilization process consist of formed military units reporting with their commanders, or individual combatants leaving active armed groups? \n What approach is being taken in other components of the DDR process \u2013 for example, is disarmament being undertaken at a mobile or static site? (See IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament.) \n Will cantonment play an important confidence-building role in the peace process? \n What does the context tell you about the potential security threat to those who demobilize? Are active armed groups likely to retaliate against former members who opt to demobilize? \n Can reception, disarmament and demobilization take place at the same site? \n Can existing sites be used? Do they require refurbishment? \n Will there be enough resources to build semi-permanent demobilization sites? How long will the construction process take? \n What are the potential risks of cantoning any one of the groups?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -83406,14 +83406,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Demobilization sites", "Heading3": "5.3.2 Temporary demobilization sites", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What approach is being taken in other components of the DDR process \u2013 for example, is disarmament being undertaken at a mobile or static site?", + "Sentence": "\n What approach is being taken in other components of the DDR process \u2013 for example, is disarmament being undertaken at a mobile or static site?", "newParagraph": "box 3 type demobilization site nn choosing type demobilization site appropriate ddr practitioner shall consider n peace agreement andor national ddr policy document contain reference demobilization site n male female combatant already community reintegrate n demobilization process consist formed military unit reporting commander individual combatant leaving active armed group n approach taken component ddr process example disarmament undertaken mobile static site see iddrs 410 disarmament n cantonment play important confidencebuilding role peace process n context tell potential security threat demobilize active armed group likely retaliate former member opt demobilize n reception disarmament demobilization take place site n existing site used require refurbishment n enough resource build semipermanent demobilization site long construction process take n potential risk cantoning one group", "ProcessedSent": "n approach taken component ddr process example disarmament undertaken mobile static site", "SentID": 4633 }, { "ParagraphID": 1469, - "Paragraph": "BOX 3: WHICH TYPE OF DEMOBILIZATION SITE \\n\\n When choosing which type of demobilization site is most appropriate, DDR practitioners shall consider: \\n Do the peace agreement and\/or national DDR policy document contain references to demobilization sites? \\n Are both male and female combatants already in the communities where they will reintegrate? \\n Will the demobilization process consist of formed military units reporting with their commanders, or individual combatants leaving active armed groups? \\n What approach is being taken in other components of the DDR process \u2013 for example, is disarmament being undertaken at a mobile or static site? (See IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament.) \\n Will cantonment play an important confidence-building role in the peace process? \\n What does the context tell you about the potential security threat to those who demobilize? Are active armed groups likely to retaliate against former members who opt to demobilize? \\n Can reception, disarmament and demobilization take place at the same site? \\n Can existing sites be used? Do they require refurbishment? \\n Will there be enough resources to build semi-permanent demobilization sites? How long will the construction process take? \\n What are the potential risks of cantoning any one of the groups?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 3: WHICH TYPE OF DEMOBILIZATION SITE \n\n When choosing which type of demobilization site is most appropriate, DDR practitioners shall consider: \n Do the peace agreement and\/or national DDR policy document contain references to demobilization sites? \n Are both male and female combatants already in the communities where they will reintegrate? \n Will the demobilization process consist of formed military units reporting with their commanders, or individual combatants leaving active armed groups? \n What approach is being taken in other components of the DDR process \u2013 for example, is disarmament being undertaken at a mobile or static site? (See IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament.) \n Will cantonment play an important confidence-building role in the peace process? \n What does the context tell you about the potential security threat to those who demobilize? Are active armed groups likely to retaliate against former members who opt to demobilize? \n Can reception, disarmament and demobilization take place at the same site? \n Can existing sites be used? Do they require refurbishment? \n Will there be enough resources to build semi-permanent demobilization sites? How long will the construction process take? \n What are the potential risks of cantoning any one of the groups?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -83431,7 +83431,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1469, - "Paragraph": "BOX 3: WHICH TYPE OF DEMOBILIZATION SITE \\n\\n When choosing which type of demobilization site is most appropriate, DDR practitioners shall consider: \\n Do the peace agreement and\/or national DDR policy document contain references to demobilization sites? \\n Are both male and female combatants already in the communities where they will reintegrate? \\n Will the demobilization process consist of formed military units reporting with their commanders, or individual combatants leaving active armed groups? \\n What approach is being taken in other components of the DDR process \u2013 for example, is disarmament being undertaken at a mobile or static site? (See IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament.) \\n Will cantonment play an important confidence-building role in the peace process? \\n What does the context tell you about the potential security threat to those who demobilize? Are active armed groups likely to retaliate against former members who opt to demobilize? \\n Can reception, disarmament and demobilization take place at the same site? \\n Can existing sites be used? Do they require refurbishment? \\n Will there be enough resources to build semi-permanent demobilization sites? How long will the construction process take? \\n What are the potential risks of cantoning any one of the groups?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 3: WHICH TYPE OF DEMOBILIZATION SITE \n\n When choosing which type of demobilization site is most appropriate, DDR practitioners shall consider: \n Do the peace agreement and\/or national DDR policy document contain references to demobilization sites? \n Are both male and female combatants already in the communities where they will reintegrate? \n Will the demobilization process consist of formed military units reporting with their commanders, or individual combatants leaving active armed groups? \n What approach is being taken in other components of the DDR process \u2013 for example, is disarmament being undertaken at a mobile or static site? (See IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament.) \n Will cantonment play an important confidence-building role in the peace process? \n What does the context tell you about the potential security threat to those who demobilize? Are active armed groups likely to retaliate against former members who opt to demobilize? \n Can reception, disarmament and demobilization take place at the same site? \n Can existing sites be used? Do they require refurbishment? \n Will there be enough resources to build semi-permanent demobilization sites? How long will the construction process take? \n What are the potential risks of cantoning any one of the groups?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -83442,14 +83442,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Demobilization sites", "Heading3": "5.3.2 Temporary demobilization sites", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Will cantonment play an important confidence-building role in the peace process?", + "Sentence": "\n Will cantonment play an important confidence-building role in the peace process?", "newParagraph": "box 3 type demobilization site nn choosing type demobilization site appropriate ddr practitioner shall consider n peace agreement andor national ddr policy document contain reference demobilization site n male female combatant already community reintegrate n demobilization process consist formed military unit reporting commander individual combatant leaving active armed group n approach taken component ddr process example disarmament undertaken mobile static site see iddrs 410 disarmament n cantonment play important confidencebuilding role peace process n context tell potential security threat demobilize active armed group likely retaliate former member opt demobilize n reception disarmament demobilization take place site n existing site used require refurbishment n enough resource build semipermanent demobilization site long construction process take n potential risk cantoning one group", "ProcessedSent": "n cantonment play important confidencebuilding role peace process", "SentID": 4635 }, { "ParagraphID": 1469, - "Paragraph": "BOX 3: WHICH TYPE OF DEMOBILIZATION SITE \\n\\n When choosing which type of demobilization site is most appropriate, DDR practitioners shall consider: \\n Do the peace agreement and\/or national DDR policy document contain references to demobilization sites? \\n Are both male and female combatants already in the communities where they will reintegrate? \\n Will the demobilization process consist of formed military units reporting with their commanders, or individual combatants leaving active armed groups? \\n What approach is being taken in other components of the DDR process \u2013 for example, is disarmament being undertaken at a mobile or static site? (See IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament.) \\n Will cantonment play an important confidence-building role in the peace process? \\n What does the context tell you about the potential security threat to those who demobilize? Are active armed groups likely to retaliate against former members who opt to demobilize? \\n Can reception, disarmament and demobilization take place at the same site? \\n Can existing sites be used? Do they require refurbishment? \\n Will there be enough resources to build semi-permanent demobilization sites? How long will the construction process take? \\n What are the potential risks of cantoning any one of the groups?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 3: WHICH TYPE OF DEMOBILIZATION SITE \n\n When choosing which type of demobilization site is most appropriate, DDR practitioners shall consider: \n Do the peace agreement and\/or national DDR policy document contain references to demobilization sites? \n Are both male and female combatants already in the communities where they will reintegrate? \n Will the demobilization process consist of formed military units reporting with their commanders, or individual combatants leaving active armed groups? \n What approach is being taken in other components of the DDR process \u2013 for example, is disarmament being undertaken at a mobile or static site? (See IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament.) \n Will cantonment play an important confidence-building role in the peace process? \n What does the context tell you about the potential security threat to those who demobilize? Are active armed groups likely to retaliate against former members who opt to demobilize? \n Can reception, disarmament and demobilization take place at the same site? \n Can existing sites be used? Do they require refurbishment? \n Will there be enough resources to build semi-permanent demobilization sites? How long will the construction process take? \n What are the potential risks of cantoning any one of the groups?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -83460,14 +83460,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Demobilization sites", "Heading3": "5.3.2 Temporary demobilization sites", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What does the context tell you about the potential security threat to those who demobilize?", + "Sentence": "\n What does the context tell you about the potential security threat to those who demobilize?", "newParagraph": "box 3 type demobilization site nn choosing type demobilization site appropriate ddr practitioner shall consider n peace agreement andor national ddr policy document contain reference demobilization site n male female combatant already community reintegrate n demobilization process consist formed military unit reporting commander individual combatant leaving active armed group n approach taken component ddr process example disarmament undertaken mobile static site see iddrs 410 disarmament n cantonment play important confidencebuilding role peace process n context tell potential security threat demobilize active armed group likely retaliate former member opt demobilize n reception disarmament demobilization take place site n existing site used require refurbishment n enough resource build semipermanent demobilization site long construction process take n potential risk cantoning one group", "ProcessedSent": "n context tell potential security threat demobilize", "SentID": 4636 }, { "ParagraphID": 1469, - "Paragraph": "BOX 3: WHICH TYPE OF DEMOBILIZATION SITE \\n\\n When choosing which type of demobilization site is most appropriate, DDR practitioners shall consider: \\n Do the peace agreement and\/or national DDR policy document contain references to demobilization sites? \\n Are both male and female combatants already in the communities where they will reintegrate? \\n Will the demobilization process consist of formed military units reporting with their commanders, or individual combatants leaving active armed groups? \\n What approach is being taken in other components of the DDR process \u2013 for example, is disarmament being undertaken at a mobile or static site? (See IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament.) \\n Will cantonment play an important confidence-building role in the peace process? \\n What does the context tell you about the potential security threat to those who demobilize? Are active armed groups likely to retaliate against former members who opt to demobilize? \\n Can reception, disarmament and demobilization take place at the same site? \\n Can existing sites be used? Do they require refurbishment? \\n Will there be enough resources to build semi-permanent demobilization sites? How long will the construction process take? \\n What are the potential risks of cantoning any one of the groups?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 3: WHICH TYPE OF DEMOBILIZATION SITE \n\n When choosing which type of demobilization site is most appropriate, DDR practitioners shall consider: \n Do the peace agreement and\/or national DDR policy document contain references to demobilization sites? \n Are both male and female combatants already in the communities where they will reintegrate? \n Will the demobilization process consist of formed military units reporting with their commanders, or individual combatants leaving active armed groups? \n What approach is being taken in other components of the DDR process \u2013 for example, is disarmament being undertaken at a mobile or static site? (See IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament.) \n Will cantonment play an important confidence-building role in the peace process? \n What does the context tell you about the potential security threat to those who demobilize? Are active armed groups likely to retaliate against former members who opt to demobilize? \n Can reception, disarmament and demobilization take place at the same site? \n Can existing sites be used? Do they require refurbishment? \n Will there be enough resources to build semi-permanent demobilization sites? How long will the construction process take? \n What are the potential risks of cantoning any one of the groups?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -83485,7 +83485,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1469, - "Paragraph": "BOX 3: WHICH TYPE OF DEMOBILIZATION SITE \\n\\n When choosing which type of demobilization site is most appropriate, DDR practitioners shall consider: \\n Do the peace agreement and\/or national DDR policy document contain references to demobilization sites? \\n Are both male and female combatants already in the communities where they will reintegrate? \\n Will the demobilization process consist of formed military units reporting with their commanders, or individual combatants leaving active armed groups? \\n What approach is being taken in other components of the DDR process \u2013 for example, is disarmament being undertaken at a mobile or static site? (See IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament.) \\n Will cantonment play an important confidence-building role in the peace process? \\n What does the context tell you about the potential security threat to those who demobilize? Are active armed groups likely to retaliate against former members who opt to demobilize? \\n Can reception, disarmament and demobilization take place at the same site? \\n Can existing sites be used? Do they require refurbishment? \\n Will there be enough resources to build semi-permanent demobilization sites? How long will the construction process take? \\n What are the potential risks of cantoning any one of the groups?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 3: WHICH TYPE OF DEMOBILIZATION SITE \n\n When choosing which type of demobilization site is most appropriate, DDR practitioners shall consider: \n Do the peace agreement and\/or national DDR policy document contain references to demobilization sites? \n Are both male and female combatants already in the communities where they will reintegrate? \n Will the demobilization process consist of formed military units reporting with their commanders, or individual combatants leaving active armed groups? \n What approach is being taken in other components of the DDR process \u2013 for example, is disarmament being undertaken at a mobile or static site? (See IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament.) \n Will cantonment play an important confidence-building role in the peace process? \n What does the context tell you about the potential security threat to those who demobilize? Are active armed groups likely to retaliate against former members who opt to demobilize? \n Can reception, disarmament and demobilization take place at the same site? \n Can existing sites be used? Do they require refurbishment? \n Will there be enough resources to build semi-permanent demobilization sites? How long will the construction process take? \n What are the potential risks of cantoning any one of the groups?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -83496,14 +83496,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Demobilization sites", "Heading3": "5.3.2 Temporary demobilization sites", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Can reception, disarmament and demobilization take place at the same site?", + "Sentence": "\n Can reception, disarmament and demobilization take place at the same site?", "newParagraph": "box 3 type demobilization site nn choosing type demobilization site appropriate ddr practitioner shall consider n peace agreement andor national ddr policy document contain reference demobilization site n male female combatant already community reintegrate n demobilization process consist formed military unit reporting commander individual combatant leaving active armed group n approach taken component ddr process example disarmament undertaken mobile static site see iddrs 410 disarmament n cantonment play important confidencebuilding role peace process n context tell potential security threat demobilize active armed group likely retaliate former member opt demobilize n reception disarmament demobilization take place site n existing site used require refurbishment n enough resource build semipermanent demobilization site long construction process take n potential risk cantoning one group", "ProcessedSent": "n reception disarmament demobilization take place site", "SentID": 4638 }, { "ParagraphID": 1469, - "Paragraph": "BOX 3: WHICH TYPE OF DEMOBILIZATION SITE \\n\\n When choosing which type of demobilization site is most appropriate, DDR practitioners shall consider: \\n Do the peace agreement and\/or national DDR policy document contain references to demobilization sites? \\n Are both male and female combatants already in the communities where they will reintegrate? \\n Will the demobilization process consist of formed military units reporting with their commanders, or individual combatants leaving active armed groups? \\n What approach is being taken in other components of the DDR process \u2013 for example, is disarmament being undertaken at a mobile or static site? (See IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament.) \\n Will cantonment play an important confidence-building role in the peace process? \\n What does the context tell you about the potential security threat to those who demobilize? Are active armed groups likely to retaliate against former members who opt to demobilize? \\n Can reception, disarmament and demobilization take place at the same site? \\n Can existing sites be used? Do they require refurbishment? \\n Will there be enough resources to build semi-permanent demobilization sites? How long will the construction process take? \\n What are the potential risks of cantoning any one of the groups?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 3: WHICH TYPE OF DEMOBILIZATION SITE \n\n When choosing which type of demobilization site is most appropriate, DDR practitioners shall consider: \n Do the peace agreement and\/or national DDR policy document contain references to demobilization sites? \n Are both male and female combatants already in the communities where they will reintegrate? \n Will the demobilization process consist of formed military units reporting with their commanders, or individual combatants leaving active armed groups? \n What approach is being taken in other components of the DDR process \u2013 for example, is disarmament being undertaken at a mobile or static site? (See IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament.) \n Will cantonment play an important confidence-building role in the peace process? \n What does the context tell you about the potential security threat to those who demobilize? Are active armed groups likely to retaliate against former members who opt to demobilize? \n Can reception, disarmament and demobilization take place at the same site? \n Can existing sites be used? Do they require refurbishment? \n Will there be enough resources to build semi-permanent demobilization sites? How long will the construction process take? \n What are the potential risks of cantoning any one of the groups?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -83514,14 +83514,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Demobilization sites", "Heading3": "5.3.2 Temporary demobilization sites", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Can existing sites be used?", + "Sentence": "\n Can existing sites be used?", "newParagraph": "box 3 type demobilization site nn choosing type demobilization site appropriate ddr practitioner shall consider n peace agreement andor national ddr policy document contain reference demobilization site n male female combatant already community reintegrate n demobilization process consist formed military unit reporting commander individual combatant leaving active armed group n approach taken component ddr process example disarmament undertaken mobile static site see iddrs 410 disarmament n cantonment play important confidencebuilding role peace process n context tell potential security threat demobilize active armed group likely retaliate former member opt demobilize n reception disarmament demobilization take place site n existing site used require refurbishment n enough resource build semipermanent demobilization site long construction process take n potential risk cantoning one group", "ProcessedSent": "n existing site used", "SentID": 4639 }, { "ParagraphID": 1469, - "Paragraph": "BOX 3: WHICH TYPE OF DEMOBILIZATION SITE \\n\\n When choosing which type of demobilization site is most appropriate, DDR practitioners shall consider: \\n Do the peace agreement and\/or national DDR policy document contain references to demobilization sites? \\n Are both male and female combatants already in the communities where they will reintegrate? \\n Will the demobilization process consist of formed military units reporting with their commanders, or individual combatants leaving active armed groups? \\n What approach is being taken in other components of the DDR process \u2013 for example, is disarmament being undertaken at a mobile or static site? (See IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament.) \\n Will cantonment play an important confidence-building role in the peace process? \\n What does the context tell you about the potential security threat to those who demobilize? Are active armed groups likely to retaliate against former members who opt to demobilize? \\n Can reception, disarmament and demobilization take place at the same site? \\n Can existing sites be used? Do they require refurbishment? \\n Will there be enough resources to build semi-permanent demobilization sites? How long will the construction process take? \\n What are the potential risks of cantoning any one of the groups?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 3: WHICH TYPE OF DEMOBILIZATION SITE \n\n When choosing which type of demobilization site is most appropriate, DDR practitioners shall consider: \n Do the peace agreement and\/or national DDR policy document contain references to demobilization sites? \n Are both male and female combatants already in the communities where they will reintegrate? \n Will the demobilization process consist of formed military units reporting with their commanders, or individual combatants leaving active armed groups? \n What approach is being taken in other components of the DDR process \u2013 for example, is disarmament being undertaken at a mobile or static site? (See IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament.) \n Will cantonment play an important confidence-building role in the peace process? \n What does the context tell you about the potential security threat to those who demobilize? Are active armed groups likely to retaliate against former members who opt to demobilize? \n Can reception, disarmament and demobilization take place at the same site? \n Can existing sites be used? Do they require refurbishment? \n Will there be enough resources to build semi-permanent demobilization sites? How long will the construction process take? \n What are the potential risks of cantoning any one of the groups?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -83539,7 +83539,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1469, - "Paragraph": "BOX 3: WHICH TYPE OF DEMOBILIZATION SITE \\n\\n When choosing which type of demobilization site is most appropriate, DDR practitioners shall consider: \\n Do the peace agreement and\/or national DDR policy document contain references to demobilization sites? \\n Are both male and female combatants already in the communities where they will reintegrate? \\n Will the demobilization process consist of formed military units reporting with their commanders, or individual combatants leaving active armed groups? \\n What approach is being taken in other components of the DDR process \u2013 for example, is disarmament being undertaken at a mobile or static site? (See IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament.) \\n Will cantonment play an important confidence-building role in the peace process? \\n What does the context tell you about the potential security threat to those who demobilize? Are active armed groups likely to retaliate against former members who opt to demobilize? \\n Can reception, disarmament and demobilization take place at the same site? \\n Can existing sites be used? Do they require refurbishment? \\n Will there be enough resources to build semi-permanent demobilization sites? How long will the construction process take? \\n What are the potential risks of cantoning any one of the groups?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 3: WHICH TYPE OF DEMOBILIZATION SITE \n\n When choosing which type of demobilization site is most appropriate, DDR practitioners shall consider: \n Do the peace agreement and\/or national DDR policy document contain references to demobilization sites? \n Are both male and female combatants already in the communities where they will reintegrate? \n Will the demobilization process consist of formed military units reporting with their commanders, or individual combatants leaving active armed groups? \n What approach is being taken in other components of the DDR process \u2013 for example, is disarmament being undertaken at a mobile or static site? (See IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament.) \n Will cantonment play an important confidence-building role in the peace process? \n What does the context tell you about the potential security threat to those who demobilize? Are active armed groups likely to retaliate against former members who opt to demobilize? \n Can reception, disarmament and demobilization take place at the same site? \n Can existing sites be used? Do they require refurbishment? \n Will there be enough resources to build semi-permanent demobilization sites? How long will the construction process take? \n What are the potential risks of cantoning any one of the groups?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -83550,14 +83550,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Demobilization sites", "Heading3": "5.3.2 Temporary demobilization sites", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Will there be enough resources to build semi-permanent demobilization sites?", + "Sentence": "\n Will there be enough resources to build semi-permanent demobilization sites?", "newParagraph": "box 3 type demobilization site nn choosing type demobilization site appropriate ddr practitioner shall consider n peace agreement andor national ddr policy document contain reference demobilization site n male female combatant already community reintegrate n demobilization process consist formed military unit reporting commander individual combatant leaving active armed group n approach taken component ddr process example disarmament undertaken mobile static site see iddrs 410 disarmament n cantonment play important confidencebuilding role peace process n context tell potential security threat demobilize active armed group likely retaliate former member opt demobilize n reception disarmament demobilization take place site n existing site used require refurbishment n enough resource build semipermanent demobilization site long construction process take n potential risk cantoning one group", "ProcessedSent": "n enough resource build semipermanent demobilization site", "SentID": 4641 }, { "ParagraphID": 1469, - "Paragraph": "BOX 3: WHICH TYPE OF DEMOBILIZATION SITE \\n\\n When choosing which type of demobilization site is most appropriate, DDR practitioners shall consider: \\n Do the peace agreement and\/or national DDR policy document contain references to demobilization sites? \\n Are both male and female combatants already in the communities where they will reintegrate? \\n Will the demobilization process consist of formed military units reporting with their commanders, or individual combatants leaving active armed groups? \\n What approach is being taken in other components of the DDR process \u2013 for example, is disarmament being undertaken at a mobile or static site? (See IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament.) \\n Will cantonment play an important confidence-building role in the peace process? \\n What does the context tell you about the potential security threat to those who demobilize? Are active armed groups likely to retaliate against former members who opt to demobilize? \\n Can reception, disarmament and demobilization take place at the same site? \\n Can existing sites be used? Do they require refurbishment? \\n Will there be enough resources to build semi-permanent demobilization sites? How long will the construction process take? \\n What are the potential risks of cantoning any one of the groups?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 3: WHICH TYPE OF DEMOBILIZATION SITE \n\n When choosing which type of demobilization site is most appropriate, DDR practitioners shall consider: \n Do the peace agreement and\/or national DDR policy document contain references to demobilization sites? \n Are both male and female combatants already in the communities where they will reintegrate? \n Will the demobilization process consist of formed military units reporting with their commanders, or individual combatants leaving active armed groups? \n What approach is being taken in other components of the DDR process \u2013 for example, is disarmament being undertaken at a mobile or static site? (See IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament.) \n Will cantonment play an important confidence-building role in the peace process? \n What does the context tell you about the potential security threat to those who demobilize? Are active armed groups likely to retaliate against former members who opt to demobilize? \n Can reception, disarmament and demobilization take place at the same site? \n Can existing sites be used? Do they require refurbishment? \n Will there be enough resources to build semi-permanent demobilization sites? How long will the construction process take? \n What are the potential risks of cantoning any one of the groups?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -83575,7 +83575,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1469, - "Paragraph": "BOX 3: WHICH TYPE OF DEMOBILIZATION SITE \\n\\n When choosing which type of demobilization site is most appropriate, DDR practitioners shall consider: \\n Do the peace agreement and\/or national DDR policy document contain references to demobilization sites? \\n Are both male and female combatants already in the communities where they will reintegrate? \\n Will the demobilization process consist of formed military units reporting with their commanders, or individual combatants leaving active armed groups? \\n What approach is being taken in other components of the DDR process \u2013 for example, is disarmament being undertaken at a mobile or static site? (See IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament.) \\n Will cantonment play an important confidence-building role in the peace process? \\n What does the context tell you about the potential security threat to those who demobilize? Are active armed groups likely to retaliate against former members who opt to demobilize? \\n Can reception, disarmament and demobilization take place at the same site? \\n Can existing sites be used? Do they require refurbishment? \\n Will there be enough resources to build semi-permanent demobilization sites? How long will the construction process take? \\n What are the potential risks of cantoning any one of the groups?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 3: WHICH TYPE OF DEMOBILIZATION SITE \n\n When choosing which type of demobilization site is most appropriate, DDR practitioners shall consider: \n Do the peace agreement and\/or national DDR policy document contain references to demobilization sites? \n Are both male and female combatants already in the communities where they will reintegrate? \n Will the demobilization process consist of formed military units reporting with their commanders, or individual combatants leaving active armed groups? \n What approach is being taken in other components of the DDR process \u2013 for example, is disarmament being undertaken at a mobile or static site? (See IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament.) \n Will cantonment play an important confidence-building role in the peace process? \n What does the context tell you about the potential security threat to those who demobilize? Are active armed groups likely to retaliate against former members who opt to demobilize? \n Can reception, disarmament and demobilization take place at the same site? \n Can existing sites be used? Do they require refurbishment? \n Will there be enough resources to build semi-permanent demobilization sites? How long will the construction process take? \n What are the potential risks of cantoning any one of the groups?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -83586,14 +83586,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Demobilization sites", "Heading3": "5.3.2 Temporary demobilization sites", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are the potential risks of cantoning any one of the groups?", + "Sentence": "\n What are the potential risks of cantoning any one of the groups?", "newParagraph": "box 3 type demobilization site nn choosing type demobilization site appropriate ddr practitioner shall consider n peace agreement andor national ddr policy document contain reference demobilization site n male female combatant already community reintegrate n demobilization process consist formed military unit reporting commander individual combatant leaving active armed group n approach taken component ddr process example disarmament undertaken mobile static site see iddrs 410 disarmament n cantonment play important confidencebuilding role peace process n context tell potential security threat demobilize active armed group likely retaliate former member opt demobilize n reception disarmament demobilization take place site n existing site used require refurbishment n enough resource build semipermanent demobilization site long construction process take n potential risk cantoning one group", "ProcessedSent": "n potential risk cantoning one group", "SentID": 4643 }, { "ParagraphID": 1470, - "Paragraph": "If the DDR programme has been negotiated within the framework of a peace agreement, then the location of semi-permanent demobilization sites may have already been agreed. If agreement has not been reached, the parties to the conflict should be involved in selecting locations. The following factors should be taken into account in the selection of locations for semi-permanent demobilization sites: \\n Accessibility: The site should be easily accessible. Distance to roads, airfields, rivers and railways should be considered. Locations and routes for medical and obstetric emergency referral must be identified, and there should be sufficient capacity for referral or medical evacuation to address any emergencies that may arise. Accessibility allowing national or international military forces to secure the site and for logistic and supply lines is extremely important. The effects of weather changes (e.g., the start of the rainy season) should be considered when assessing accessibility. \\n Security: Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups should feel and be safe in the selected location. When establishing sites, it is important to consider the general political and military environment, as well as how vulnerable DDR participants are to potential threats, including cross-border violence and retaliation by active armed forces and groups. The security of nearby communities must also be taken into account. \\n Local communities: DDR practitioners should adequately liaise with local leaders and national and international military forces to ensure that nearby communities are not adversely affected by the demobilization site or operation. \\n General amenities: Demobilization sites should be chosen with the following needs taken into account: potable water supply, washing and toilet facilities (separate facilities for men and women, with locks and lighting if they will be used after dark), drainage for rain and waste, flooding potential and the natural water course, local power and food supply, environmental hazards, pollution, infestation, cooking and eating facilities, lighting both for security and functionality, and, finally, facility space for recreation, including sports. Special arrangements\/contingency plans should be made for children, persons with disabilities, persons with chronic illnesses, and pregnant or lactating women. \\n Storage facilities\/armoury: If disarmament and demobilization are to take place at the same site, secure and guarded facilities\/armouries for temporary storage of collected weapons shall be set up (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \\n Communications infrastructure: The site should be located in an area suitable for radio and\/or telecommunications infrastructure.", + "Paragraph": "If the DDR programme has been negotiated within the framework of a peace agreement, then the location of semi-permanent demobilization sites may have already been agreed. If agreement has not been reached, the parties to the conflict should be involved in selecting locations. The following factors should be taken into account in the selection of locations for semi-permanent demobilization sites: \n Accessibility: The site should be easily accessible. Distance to roads, airfields, rivers and railways should be considered. Locations and routes for medical and obstetric emergency referral must be identified, and there should be sufficient capacity for referral or medical evacuation to address any emergencies that may arise. Accessibility allowing national or international military forces to secure the site and for logistic and supply lines is extremely important. The effects of weather changes (e.g., the start of the rainy season) should be considered when assessing accessibility. \n Security: Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups should feel and be safe in the selected location. When establishing sites, it is important to consider the general political and military environment, as well as how vulnerable DDR participants are to potential threats, including cross-border violence and retaliation by active armed forces and groups. The security of nearby communities must also be taken into account. \n Local communities: DDR practitioners should adequately liaise with local leaders and national and international military forces to ensure that nearby communities are not adversely affected by the demobilization site or operation. \n General amenities: Demobilization sites should be chosen with the following needs taken into account: potable water supply, washing and toilet facilities (separate facilities for men and women, with locks and lighting if they will be used after dark), drainage for rain and waste, flooding potential and the natural water course, local power and food supply, environmental hazards, pollution, infestation, cooking and eating facilities, lighting both for security and functionality, and, finally, facility space for recreation, including sports. Special arrangements\/contingency plans should be made for children, persons with disabilities, persons with chronic illnesses, and pregnant or lactating women. \n Storage facilities\/armoury: If disarmament and demobilization are to take place at the same site, secure and guarded facilities\/armouries for temporary storage of collected weapons shall be set up (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \n Communications infrastructure: The site should be located in an area suitable for radio and\/or telecommunications infrastructure.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -83611,7 +83611,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1470, - "Paragraph": "If the DDR programme has been negotiated within the framework of a peace agreement, then the location of semi-permanent demobilization sites may have already been agreed. If agreement has not been reached, the parties to the conflict should be involved in selecting locations. The following factors should be taken into account in the selection of locations for semi-permanent demobilization sites: \\n Accessibility: The site should be easily accessible. Distance to roads, airfields, rivers and railways should be considered. Locations and routes for medical and obstetric emergency referral must be identified, and there should be sufficient capacity for referral or medical evacuation to address any emergencies that may arise. Accessibility allowing national or international military forces to secure the site and for logistic and supply lines is extremely important. The effects of weather changes (e.g., the start of the rainy season) should be considered when assessing accessibility. \\n Security: Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups should feel and be safe in the selected location. When establishing sites, it is important to consider the general political and military environment, as well as how vulnerable DDR participants are to potential threats, including cross-border violence and retaliation by active armed forces and groups. The security of nearby communities must also be taken into account. \\n Local communities: DDR practitioners should adequately liaise with local leaders and national and international military forces to ensure that nearby communities are not adversely affected by the demobilization site or operation. \\n General amenities: Demobilization sites should be chosen with the following needs taken into account: potable water supply, washing and toilet facilities (separate facilities for men and women, with locks and lighting if they will be used after dark), drainage for rain and waste, flooding potential and the natural water course, local power and food supply, environmental hazards, pollution, infestation, cooking and eating facilities, lighting both for security and functionality, and, finally, facility space for recreation, including sports. Special arrangements\/contingency plans should be made for children, persons with disabilities, persons with chronic illnesses, and pregnant or lactating women. \\n Storage facilities\/armoury: If disarmament and demobilization are to take place at the same site, secure and guarded facilities\/armouries for temporary storage of collected weapons shall be set up (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \\n Communications infrastructure: The site should be located in an area suitable for radio and\/or telecommunications infrastructure.", + "Paragraph": "If the DDR programme has been negotiated within the framework of a peace agreement, then the location of semi-permanent demobilization sites may have already been agreed. If agreement has not been reached, the parties to the conflict should be involved in selecting locations. The following factors should be taken into account in the selection of locations for semi-permanent demobilization sites: \n Accessibility: The site should be easily accessible. Distance to roads, airfields, rivers and railways should be considered. Locations and routes for medical and obstetric emergency referral must be identified, and there should be sufficient capacity for referral or medical evacuation to address any emergencies that may arise. Accessibility allowing national or international military forces to secure the site and for logistic and supply lines is extremely important. The effects of weather changes (e.g., the start of the rainy season) should be considered when assessing accessibility. \n Security: Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups should feel and be safe in the selected location. When establishing sites, it is important to consider the general political and military environment, as well as how vulnerable DDR participants are to potential threats, including cross-border violence and retaliation by active armed forces and groups. The security of nearby communities must also be taken into account. \n Local communities: DDR practitioners should adequately liaise with local leaders and national and international military forces to ensure that nearby communities are not adversely affected by the demobilization site or operation. \n General amenities: Demobilization sites should be chosen with the following needs taken into account: potable water supply, washing and toilet facilities (separate facilities for men and women, with locks and lighting if they will be used after dark), drainage for rain and waste, flooding potential and the natural water course, local power and food supply, environmental hazards, pollution, infestation, cooking and eating facilities, lighting both for security and functionality, and, finally, facility space for recreation, including sports. Special arrangements\/contingency plans should be made for children, persons with disabilities, persons with chronic illnesses, and pregnant or lactating women. \n Storage facilities\/armoury: If disarmament and demobilization are to take place at the same site, secure and guarded facilities\/armouries for temporary storage of collected weapons shall be set up (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \n Communications infrastructure: The site should be located in an area suitable for radio and\/or telecommunications infrastructure.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -83629,7 +83629,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1470, - "Paragraph": "If the DDR programme has been negotiated within the framework of a peace agreement, then the location of semi-permanent demobilization sites may have already been agreed. If agreement has not been reached, the parties to the conflict should be involved in selecting locations. The following factors should be taken into account in the selection of locations for semi-permanent demobilization sites: \\n Accessibility: The site should be easily accessible. Distance to roads, airfields, rivers and railways should be considered. Locations and routes for medical and obstetric emergency referral must be identified, and there should be sufficient capacity for referral or medical evacuation to address any emergencies that may arise. Accessibility allowing national or international military forces to secure the site and for logistic and supply lines is extremely important. The effects of weather changes (e.g., the start of the rainy season) should be considered when assessing accessibility. \\n Security: Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups should feel and be safe in the selected location. When establishing sites, it is important to consider the general political and military environment, as well as how vulnerable DDR participants are to potential threats, including cross-border violence and retaliation by active armed forces and groups. The security of nearby communities must also be taken into account. \\n Local communities: DDR practitioners should adequately liaise with local leaders and national and international military forces to ensure that nearby communities are not adversely affected by the demobilization site or operation. \\n General amenities: Demobilization sites should be chosen with the following needs taken into account: potable water supply, washing and toilet facilities (separate facilities for men and women, with locks and lighting if they will be used after dark), drainage for rain and waste, flooding potential and the natural water course, local power and food supply, environmental hazards, pollution, infestation, cooking and eating facilities, lighting both for security and functionality, and, finally, facility space for recreation, including sports. Special arrangements\/contingency plans should be made for children, persons with disabilities, persons with chronic illnesses, and pregnant or lactating women. \\n Storage facilities\/armoury: If disarmament and demobilization are to take place at the same site, secure and guarded facilities\/armouries for temporary storage of collected weapons shall be set up (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \\n Communications infrastructure: The site should be located in an area suitable for radio and\/or telecommunications infrastructure.", + "Paragraph": "If the DDR programme has been negotiated within the framework of a peace agreement, then the location of semi-permanent demobilization sites may have already been agreed. If agreement has not been reached, the parties to the conflict should be involved in selecting locations. The following factors should be taken into account in the selection of locations for semi-permanent demobilization sites: \n Accessibility: The site should be easily accessible. Distance to roads, airfields, rivers and railways should be considered. Locations and routes for medical and obstetric emergency referral must be identified, and there should be sufficient capacity for referral or medical evacuation to address any emergencies that may arise. Accessibility allowing national or international military forces to secure the site and for logistic and supply lines is extremely important. The effects of weather changes (e.g., the start of the rainy season) should be considered when assessing accessibility. \n Security: Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups should feel and be safe in the selected location. When establishing sites, it is important to consider the general political and military environment, as well as how vulnerable DDR participants are to potential threats, including cross-border violence and retaliation by active armed forces and groups. The security of nearby communities must also be taken into account. \n Local communities: DDR practitioners should adequately liaise with local leaders and national and international military forces to ensure that nearby communities are not adversely affected by the demobilization site or operation. \n General amenities: Demobilization sites should be chosen with the following needs taken into account: potable water supply, washing and toilet facilities (separate facilities for men and women, with locks and lighting if they will be used after dark), drainage for rain and waste, flooding potential and the natural water course, local power and food supply, environmental hazards, pollution, infestation, cooking and eating facilities, lighting both for security and functionality, and, finally, facility space for recreation, including sports. Special arrangements\/contingency plans should be made for children, persons with disabilities, persons with chronic illnesses, and pregnant or lactating women. \n Storage facilities\/armoury: If disarmament and demobilization are to take place at the same site, secure and guarded facilities\/armouries for temporary storage of collected weapons shall be set up (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \n Communications infrastructure: The site should be located in an area suitable for radio and\/or telecommunications infrastructure.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -83640,14 +83640,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Demobilization sites", "Heading3": "5.3.3 Location", "Heading4": "Semi-permanent demobilization sites", - "Sentence": "The following factors should be taken into account in the selection of locations for semi-permanent demobilization sites: \\n Accessibility: The site should be easily accessible.", + "Sentence": "The following factors should be taken into account in the selection of locations for semi-permanent demobilization sites: \n Accessibility: The site should be easily accessible.", "newParagraph": "ddr programme negotiated within framework peace agreement location semipermanent demobilization site may already agreed agreement reached party conflict involved selecting location following factor taken account selection location semipermanent demobilization site n accessibility site easily accessible distance road airfield river railway considered location route medical obstetric emergency referral must identified sufficient capacity referral medical evacuation address emergency may arise accessibility allowing national international military force secure site logistic supply line extremely important effect weather change eg start rainy season considered assessing accessibility n security excombatants person formerly associated armed force group feel safe selected location establishing site important consider general political military environment well vulnerable ddr participant potential threat including crossborder violence retaliation active armed force group security nearby community must also taken account n local community ddr practitioner adequately liaise local leader national international military force ensure nearby community adversely affected demobilization site operation n general amenity demobilization site chosen following need taken account potable water supply washing toilet facility separate facility men woman lock lighting used dark drainage rain waste flooding potential natural water course local power food supply environmental hazard pollution infestation cooking eating facility lighting security functionality finally facility space recreation including sport special arrangementscontingency plan made child person disability person chronic illness pregnant lactating woman n storage facilitiesarmoury disarmament demobilization take place site secure guarded facilitiesarmouries temporary storage collected weapon shall set see iddrs 410 disarmament n communication infrastructure site located area suitable radio andor telecommunication infrastructure", "ProcessedSent": "following factor taken account selection location semipermanent demobilization site n accessibility site easily accessible", "SentID": 4646 }, { "ParagraphID": 1470, - "Paragraph": "If the DDR programme has been negotiated within the framework of a peace agreement, then the location of semi-permanent demobilization sites may have already been agreed. If agreement has not been reached, the parties to the conflict should be involved in selecting locations. The following factors should be taken into account in the selection of locations for semi-permanent demobilization sites: \\n Accessibility: The site should be easily accessible. Distance to roads, airfields, rivers and railways should be considered. Locations and routes for medical and obstetric emergency referral must be identified, and there should be sufficient capacity for referral or medical evacuation to address any emergencies that may arise. Accessibility allowing national or international military forces to secure the site and for logistic and supply lines is extremely important. The effects of weather changes (e.g., the start of the rainy season) should be considered when assessing accessibility. \\n Security: Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups should feel and be safe in the selected location. When establishing sites, it is important to consider the general political and military environment, as well as how vulnerable DDR participants are to potential threats, including cross-border violence and retaliation by active armed forces and groups. The security of nearby communities must also be taken into account. \\n Local communities: DDR practitioners should adequately liaise with local leaders and national and international military forces to ensure that nearby communities are not adversely affected by the demobilization site or operation. \\n General amenities: Demobilization sites should be chosen with the following needs taken into account: potable water supply, washing and toilet facilities (separate facilities for men and women, with locks and lighting if they will be used after dark), drainage for rain and waste, flooding potential and the natural water course, local power and food supply, environmental hazards, pollution, infestation, cooking and eating facilities, lighting both for security and functionality, and, finally, facility space for recreation, including sports. Special arrangements\/contingency plans should be made for children, persons with disabilities, persons with chronic illnesses, and pregnant or lactating women. \\n Storage facilities\/armoury: If disarmament and demobilization are to take place at the same site, secure and guarded facilities\/armouries for temporary storage of collected weapons shall be set up (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \\n Communications infrastructure: The site should be located in an area suitable for radio and\/or telecommunications infrastructure.", + "Paragraph": "If the DDR programme has been negotiated within the framework of a peace agreement, then the location of semi-permanent demobilization sites may have already been agreed. If agreement has not been reached, the parties to the conflict should be involved in selecting locations. The following factors should be taken into account in the selection of locations for semi-permanent demobilization sites: \n Accessibility: The site should be easily accessible. Distance to roads, airfields, rivers and railways should be considered. Locations and routes for medical and obstetric emergency referral must be identified, and there should be sufficient capacity for referral or medical evacuation to address any emergencies that may arise. Accessibility allowing national or international military forces to secure the site and for logistic and supply lines is extremely important. The effects of weather changes (e.g., the start of the rainy season) should be considered when assessing accessibility. \n Security: Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups should feel and be safe in the selected location. When establishing sites, it is important to consider the general political and military environment, as well as how vulnerable DDR participants are to potential threats, including cross-border violence and retaliation by active armed forces and groups. The security of nearby communities must also be taken into account. \n Local communities: DDR practitioners should adequately liaise with local leaders and national and international military forces to ensure that nearby communities are not adversely affected by the demobilization site or operation. \n General amenities: Demobilization sites should be chosen with the following needs taken into account: potable water supply, washing and toilet facilities (separate facilities for men and women, with locks and lighting if they will be used after dark), drainage for rain and waste, flooding potential and the natural water course, local power and food supply, environmental hazards, pollution, infestation, cooking and eating facilities, lighting both for security and functionality, and, finally, facility space for recreation, including sports. Special arrangements\/contingency plans should be made for children, persons with disabilities, persons with chronic illnesses, and pregnant or lactating women. \n Storage facilities\/armoury: If disarmament and demobilization are to take place at the same site, secure and guarded facilities\/armouries for temporary storage of collected weapons shall be set up (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \n Communications infrastructure: The site should be located in an area suitable for radio and\/or telecommunications infrastructure.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -83665,7 +83665,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1470, - "Paragraph": "If the DDR programme has been negotiated within the framework of a peace agreement, then the location of semi-permanent demobilization sites may have already been agreed. If agreement has not been reached, the parties to the conflict should be involved in selecting locations. The following factors should be taken into account in the selection of locations for semi-permanent demobilization sites: \\n Accessibility: The site should be easily accessible. Distance to roads, airfields, rivers and railways should be considered. Locations and routes for medical and obstetric emergency referral must be identified, and there should be sufficient capacity for referral or medical evacuation to address any emergencies that may arise. Accessibility allowing national or international military forces to secure the site and for logistic and supply lines is extremely important. The effects of weather changes (e.g., the start of the rainy season) should be considered when assessing accessibility. \\n Security: Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups should feel and be safe in the selected location. When establishing sites, it is important to consider the general political and military environment, as well as how vulnerable DDR participants are to potential threats, including cross-border violence and retaliation by active armed forces and groups. The security of nearby communities must also be taken into account. \\n Local communities: DDR practitioners should adequately liaise with local leaders and national and international military forces to ensure that nearby communities are not adversely affected by the demobilization site or operation. \\n General amenities: Demobilization sites should be chosen with the following needs taken into account: potable water supply, washing and toilet facilities (separate facilities for men and women, with locks and lighting if they will be used after dark), drainage for rain and waste, flooding potential and the natural water course, local power and food supply, environmental hazards, pollution, infestation, cooking and eating facilities, lighting both for security and functionality, and, finally, facility space for recreation, including sports. Special arrangements\/contingency plans should be made for children, persons with disabilities, persons with chronic illnesses, and pregnant or lactating women. \\n Storage facilities\/armoury: If disarmament and demobilization are to take place at the same site, secure and guarded facilities\/armouries for temporary storage of collected weapons shall be set up (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \\n Communications infrastructure: The site should be located in an area suitable for radio and\/or telecommunications infrastructure.", + "Paragraph": "If the DDR programme has been negotiated within the framework of a peace agreement, then the location of semi-permanent demobilization sites may have already been agreed. If agreement has not been reached, the parties to the conflict should be involved in selecting locations. The following factors should be taken into account in the selection of locations for semi-permanent demobilization sites: \n Accessibility: The site should be easily accessible. Distance to roads, airfields, rivers and railways should be considered. Locations and routes for medical and obstetric emergency referral must be identified, and there should be sufficient capacity for referral or medical evacuation to address any emergencies that may arise. Accessibility allowing national or international military forces to secure the site and for logistic and supply lines is extremely important. The effects of weather changes (e.g., the start of the rainy season) should be considered when assessing accessibility. \n Security: Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups should feel and be safe in the selected location. When establishing sites, it is important to consider the general political and military environment, as well as how vulnerable DDR participants are to potential threats, including cross-border violence and retaliation by active armed forces and groups. The security of nearby communities must also be taken into account. \n Local communities: DDR practitioners should adequately liaise with local leaders and national and international military forces to ensure that nearby communities are not adversely affected by the demobilization site or operation. \n General amenities: Demobilization sites should be chosen with the following needs taken into account: potable water supply, washing and toilet facilities (separate facilities for men and women, with locks and lighting if they will be used after dark), drainage for rain and waste, flooding potential and the natural water course, local power and food supply, environmental hazards, pollution, infestation, cooking and eating facilities, lighting both for security and functionality, and, finally, facility space for recreation, including sports. Special arrangements\/contingency plans should be made for children, persons with disabilities, persons with chronic illnesses, and pregnant or lactating women. \n Storage facilities\/armoury: If disarmament and demobilization are to take place at the same site, secure and guarded facilities\/armouries for temporary storage of collected weapons shall be set up (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \n Communications infrastructure: The site should be located in an area suitable for radio and\/or telecommunications infrastructure.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -83683,7 +83683,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1470, - "Paragraph": "If the DDR programme has been negotiated within the framework of a peace agreement, then the location of semi-permanent demobilization sites may have already been agreed. If agreement has not been reached, the parties to the conflict should be involved in selecting locations. The following factors should be taken into account in the selection of locations for semi-permanent demobilization sites: \\n Accessibility: The site should be easily accessible. Distance to roads, airfields, rivers and railways should be considered. Locations and routes for medical and obstetric emergency referral must be identified, and there should be sufficient capacity for referral or medical evacuation to address any emergencies that may arise. Accessibility allowing national or international military forces to secure the site and for logistic and supply lines is extremely important. The effects of weather changes (e.g., the start of the rainy season) should be considered when assessing accessibility. \\n Security: Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups should feel and be safe in the selected location. When establishing sites, it is important to consider the general political and military environment, as well as how vulnerable DDR participants are to potential threats, including cross-border violence and retaliation by active armed forces and groups. The security of nearby communities must also be taken into account. \\n Local communities: DDR practitioners should adequately liaise with local leaders and national and international military forces to ensure that nearby communities are not adversely affected by the demobilization site or operation. \\n General amenities: Demobilization sites should be chosen with the following needs taken into account: potable water supply, washing and toilet facilities (separate facilities for men and women, with locks and lighting if they will be used after dark), drainage for rain and waste, flooding potential and the natural water course, local power and food supply, environmental hazards, pollution, infestation, cooking and eating facilities, lighting both for security and functionality, and, finally, facility space for recreation, including sports. Special arrangements\/contingency plans should be made for children, persons with disabilities, persons with chronic illnesses, and pregnant or lactating women. \\n Storage facilities\/armoury: If disarmament and demobilization are to take place at the same site, secure and guarded facilities\/armouries for temporary storage of collected weapons shall be set up (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \\n Communications infrastructure: The site should be located in an area suitable for radio and\/or telecommunications infrastructure.", + "Paragraph": "If the DDR programme has been negotiated within the framework of a peace agreement, then the location of semi-permanent demobilization sites may have already been agreed. If agreement has not been reached, the parties to the conflict should be involved in selecting locations. The following factors should be taken into account in the selection of locations for semi-permanent demobilization sites: \n Accessibility: The site should be easily accessible. Distance to roads, airfields, rivers and railways should be considered. Locations and routes for medical and obstetric emergency referral must be identified, and there should be sufficient capacity for referral or medical evacuation to address any emergencies that may arise. Accessibility allowing national or international military forces to secure the site and for logistic and supply lines is extremely important. The effects of weather changes (e.g., the start of the rainy season) should be considered when assessing accessibility. \n Security: Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups should feel and be safe in the selected location. When establishing sites, it is important to consider the general political and military environment, as well as how vulnerable DDR participants are to potential threats, including cross-border violence and retaliation by active armed forces and groups. The security of nearby communities must also be taken into account. \n Local communities: DDR practitioners should adequately liaise with local leaders and national and international military forces to ensure that nearby communities are not adversely affected by the demobilization site or operation. \n General amenities: Demobilization sites should be chosen with the following needs taken into account: potable water supply, washing and toilet facilities (separate facilities for men and women, with locks and lighting if they will be used after dark), drainage for rain and waste, flooding potential and the natural water course, local power and food supply, environmental hazards, pollution, infestation, cooking and eating facilities, lighting both for security and functionality, and, finally, facility space for recreation, including sports. Special arrangements\/contingency plans should be made for children, persons with disabilities, persons with chronic illnesses, and pregnant or lactating women. \n Storage facilities\/armoury: If disarmament and demobilization are to take place at the same site, secure and guarded facilities\/armouries for temporary storage of collected weapons shall be set up (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \n Communications infrastructure: The site should be located in an area suitable for radio and\/or telecommunications infrastructure.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -83701,7 +83701,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1470, - "Paragraph": "If the DDR programme has been negotiated within the framework of a peace agreement, then the location of semi-permanent demobilization sites may have already been agreed. If agreement has not been reached, the parties to the conflict should be involved in selecting locations. The following factors should be taken into account in the selection of locations for semi-permanent demobilization sites: \\n Accessibility: The site should be easily accessible. Distance to roads, airfields, rivers and railways should be considered. Locations and routes for medical and obstetric emergency referral must be identified, and there should be sufficient capacity for referral or medical evacuation to address any emergencies that may arise. Accessibility allowing national or international military forces to secure the site and for logistic and supply lines is extremely important. The effects of weather changes (e.g., the start of the rainy season) should be considered when assessing accessibility. \\n Security: Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups should feel and be safe in the selected location. When establishing sites, it is important to consider the general political and military environment, as well as how vulnerable DDR participants are to potential threats, including cross-border violence and retaliation by active armed forces and groups. The security of nearby communities must also be taken into account. \\n Local communities: DDR practitioners should adequately liaise with local leaders and national and international military forces to ensure that nearby communities are not adversely affected by the demobilization site or operation. \\n General amenities: Demobilization sites should be chosen with the following needs taken into account: potable water supply, washing and toilet facilities (separate facilities for men and women, with locks and lighting if they will be used after dark), drainage for rain and waste, flooding potential and the natural water course, local power and food supply, environmental hazards, pollution, infestation, cooking and eating facilities, lighting both for security and functionality, and, finally, facility space for recreation, including sports. Special arrangements\/contingency plans should be made for children, persons with disabilities, persons with chronic illnesses, and pregnant or lactating women. \\n Storage facilities\/armoury: If disarmament and demobilization are to take place at the same site, secure and guarded facilities\/armouries for temporary storage of collected weapons shall be set up (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \\n Communications infrastructure: The site should be located in an area suitable for radio and\/or telecommunications infrastructure.", + "Paragraph": "If the DDR programme has been negotiated within the framework of a peace agreement, then the location of semi-permanent demobilization sites may have already been agreed. If agreement has not been reached, the parties to the conflict should be involved in selecting locations. The following factors should be taken into account in the selection of locations for semi-permanent demobilization sites: \n Accessibility: The site should be easily accessible. Distance to roads, airfields, rivers and railways should be considered. Locations and routes for medical and obstetric emergency referral must be identified, and there should be sufficient capacity for referral or medical evacuation to address any emergencies that may arise. Accessibility allowing national or international military forces to secure the site and for logistic and supply lines is extremely important. The effects of weather changes (e.g., the start of the rainy season) should be considered when assessing accessibility. \n Security: Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups should feel and be safe in the selected location. When establishing sites, it is important to consider the general political and military environment, as well as how vulnerable DDR participants are to potential threats, including cross-border violence and retaliation by active armed forces and groups. The security of nearby communities must also be taken into account. \n Local communities: DDR practitioners should adequately liaise with local leaders and national and international military forces to ensure that nearby communities are not adversely affected by the demobilization site or operation. \n General amenities: Demobilization sites should be chosen with the following needs taken into account: potable water supply, washing and toilet facilities (separate facilities for men and women, with locks and lighting if they will be used after dark), drainage for rain and waste, flooding potential and the natural water course, local power and food supply, environmental hazards, pollution, infestation, cooking and eating facilities, lighting both for security and functionality, and, finally, facility space for recreation, including sports. Special arrangements\/contingency plans should be made for children, persons with disabilities, persons with chronic illnesses, and pregnant or lactating women. \n Storage facilities\/armoury: If disarmament and demobilization are to take place at the same site, secure and guarded facilities\/armouries for temporary storage of collected weapons shall be set up (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \n Communications infrastructure: The site should be located in an area suitable for radio and\/or telecommunications infrastructure.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -83719,7 +83719,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1470, - "Paragraph": "If the DDR programme has been negotiated within the framework of a peace agreement, then the location of semi-permanent demobilization sites may have already been agreed. If agreement has not been reached, the parties to the conflict should be involved in selecting locations. The following factors should be taken into account in the selection of locations for semi-permanent demobilization sites: \\n Accessibility: The site should be easily accessible. Distance to roads, airfields, rivers and railways should be considered. Locations and routes for medical and obstetric emergency referral must be identified, and there should be sufficient capacity for referral or medical evacuation to address any emergencies that may arise. Accessibility allowing national or international military forces to secure the site and for logistic and supply lines is extremely important. The effects of weather changes (e.g., the start of the rainy season) should be considered when assessing accessibility. \\n Security: Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups should feel and be safe in the selected location. When establishing sites, it is important to consider the general political and military environment, as well as how vulnerable DDR participants are to potential threats, including cross-border violence and retaliation by active armed forces and groups. The security of nearby communities must also be taken into account. \\n Local communities: DDR practitioners should adequately liaise with local leaders and national and international military forces to ensure that nearby communities are not adversely affected by the demobilization site or operation. \\n General amenities: Demobilization sites should be chosen with the following needs taken into account: potable water supply, washing and toilet facilities (separate facilities for men and women, with locks and lighting if they will be used after dark), drainage for rain and waste, flooding potential and the natural water course, local power and food supply, environmental hazards, pollution, infestation, cooking and eating facilities, lighting both for security and functionality, and, finally, facility space for recreation, including sports. Special arrangements\/contingency plans should be made for children, persons with disabilities, persons with chronic illnesses, and pregnant or lactating women. \\n Storage facilities\/armoury: If disarmament and demobilization are to take place at the same site, secure and guarded facilities\/armouries for temporary storage of collected weapons shall be set up (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \\n Communications infrastructure: The site should be located in an area suitable for radio and\/or telecommunications infrastructure.", + "Paragraph": "If the DDR programme has been negotiated within the framework of a peace agreement, then the location of semi-permanent demobilization sites may have already been agreed. If agreement has not been reached, the parties to the conflict should be involved in selecting locations. The following factors should be taken into account in the selection of locations for semi-permanent demobilization sites: \n Accessibility: The site should be easily accessible. Distance to roads, airfields, rivers and railways should be considered. Locations and routes for medical and obstetric emergency referral must be identified, and there should be sufficient capacity for referral or medical evacuation to address any emergencies that may arise. Accessibility allowing national or international military forces to secure the site and for logistic and supply lines is extremely important. The effects of weather changes (e.g., the start of the rainy season) should be considered when assessing accessibility. \n Security: Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups should feel and be safe in the selected location. When establishing sites, it is important to consider the general political and military environment, as well as how vulnerable DDR participants are to potential threats, including cross-border violence and retaliation by active armed forces and groups. The security of nearby communities must also be taken into account. \n Local communities: DDR practitioners should adequately liaise with local leaders and national and international military forces to ensure that nearby communities are not adversely affected by the demobilization site or operation. \n General amenities: Demobilization sites should be chosen with the following needs taken into account: potable water supply, washing and toilet facilities (separate facilities for men and women, with locks and lighting if they will be used after dark), drainage for rain and waste, flooding potential and the natural water course, local power and food supply, environmental hazards, pollution, infestation, cooking and eating facilities, lighting both for security and functionality, and, finally, facility space for recreation, including sports. Special arrangements\/contingency plans should be made for children, persons with disabilities, persons with chronic illnesses, and pregnant or lactating women. \n Storage facilities\/armoury: If disarmament and demobilization are to take place at the same site, secure and guarded facilities\/armouries for temporary storage of collected weapons shall be set up (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \n Communications infrastructure: The site should be located in an area suitable for radio and\/or telecommunications infrastructure.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -83730,14 +83730,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Demobilization sites", "Heading3": "5.3.3 Location", "Heading4": "Semi-permanent demobilization sites", - "Sentence": "\\n Security: Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups should feel and be safe in the selected location.", + "Sentence": "\n Security: Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups should feel and be safe in the selected location.", "newParagraph": "ddr programme negotiated within framework peace agreement location semipermanent demobilization site may already agreed agreement reached party conflict involved selecting location following factor taken account selection location semipermanent demobilization site n accessibility site easily accessible distance road airfield river railway considered location route medical obstetric emergency referral must identified sufficient capacity referral medical evacuation address emergency may arise accessibility allowing national international military force secure site logistic supply line extremely important effect weather change eg start rainy season considered assessing accessibility n security excombatants person formerly associated armed force group feel safe selected location establishing site important consider general political military environment well vulnerable ddr participant potential threat including crossborder violence retaliation active armed force group security nearby community must also taken account n local community ddr practitioner adequately liaise local leader national international military force ensure nearby community adversely affected demobilization site operation n general amenity demobilization site chosen following need taken account potable water supply washing toilet facility separate facility men woman lock lighting used dark drainage rain waste flooding potential natural water course local power food supply environmental hazard pollution infestation cooking eating facility lighting security functionality finally facility space recreation including sport special arrangementscontingency plan made child person disability person chronic illness pregnant lactating woman n storage facilitiesarmoury disarmament demobilization take place site secure guarded facilitiesarmouries temporary storage collected weapon shall set see iddrs 410 disarmament n communication infrastructure site located area suitable radio andor telecommunication infrastructure", "ProcessedSent": "n security excombatants person formerly associated armed force group feel safe selected location", "SentID": 4651 }, { "ParagraphID": 1470, - "Paragraph": "If the DDR programme has been negotiated within the framework of a peace agreement, then the location of semi-permanent demobilization sites may have already been agreed. If agreement has not been reached, the parties to the conflict should be involved in selecting locations. The following factors should be taken into account in the selection of locations for semi-permanent demobilization sites: \\n Accessibility: The site should be easily accessible. Distance to roads, airfields, rivers and railways should be considered. Locations and routes for medical and obstetric emergency referral must be identified, and there should be sufficient capacity for referral or medical evacuation to address any emergencies that may arise. Accessibility allowing national or international military forces to secure the site and for logistic and supply lines is extremely important. The effects of weather changes (e.g., the start of the rainy season) should be considered when assessing accessibility. \\n Security: Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups should feel and be safe in the selected location. When establishing sites, it is important to consider the general political and military environment, as well as how vulnerable DDR participants are to potential threats, including cross-border violence and retaliation by active armed forces and groups. The security of nearby communities must also be taken into account. \\n Local communities: DDR practitioners should adequately liaise with local leaders and national and international military forces to ensure that nearby communities are not adversely affected by the demobilization site or operation. \\n General amenities: Demobilization sites should be chosen with the following needs taken into account: potable water supply, washing and toilet facilities (separate facilities for men and women, with locks and lighting if they will be used after dark), drainage for rain and waste, flooding potential and the natural water course, local power and food supply, environmental hazards, pollution, infestation, cooking and eating facilities, lighting both for security and functionality, and, finally, facility space for recreation, including sports. Special arrangements\/contingency plans should be made for children, persons with disabilities, persons with chronic illnesses, and pregnant or lactating women. \\n Storage facilities\/armoury: If disarmament and demobilization are to take place at the same site, secure and guarded facilities\/armouries for temporary storage of collected weapons shall be set up (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \\n Communications infrastructure: The site should be located in an area suitable for radio and\/or telecommunications infrastructure.", + "Paragraph": "If the DDR programme has been negotiated within the framework of a peace agreement, then the location of semi-permanent demobilization sites may have already been agreed. If agreement has not been reached, the parties to the conflict should be involved in selecting locations. The following factors should be taken into account in the selection of locations for semi-permanent demobilization sites: \n Accessibility: The site should be easily accessible. Distance to roads, airfields, rivers and railways should be considered. Locations and routes for medical and obstetric emergency referral must be identified, and there should be sufficient capacity for referral or medical evacuation to address any emergencies that may arise. Accessibility allowing national or international military forces to secure the site and for logistic and supply lines is extremely important. The effects of weather changes (e.g., the start of the rainy season) should be considered when assessing accessibility. \n Security: Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups should feel and be safe in the selected location. When establishing sites, it is important to consider the general political and military environment, as well as how vulnerable DDR participants are to potential threats, including cross-border violence and retaliation by active armed forces and groups. The security of nearby communities must also be taken into account. \n Local communities: DDR practitioners should adequately liaise with local leaders and national and international military forces to ensure that nearby communities are not adversely affected by the demobilization site or operation. \n General amenities: Demobilization sites should be chosen with the following needs taken into account: potable water supply, washing and toilet facilities (separate facilities for men and women, with locks and lighting if they will be used after dark), drainage for rain and waste, flooding potential and the natural water course, local power and food supply, environmental hazards, pollution, infestation, cooking and eating facilities, lighting both for security and functionality, and, finally, facility space for recreation, including sports. Special arrangements\/contingency plans should be made for children, persons with disabilities, persons with chronic illnesses, and pregnant or lactating women. \n Storage facilities\/armoury: If disarmament and demobilization are to take place at the same site, secure and guarded facilities\/armouries for temporary storage of collected weapons shall be set up (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \n Communications infrastructure: The site should be located in an area suitable for radio and\/or telecommunications infrastructure.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -83755,7 +83755,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1470, - "Paragraph": "If the DDR programme has been negotiated within the framework of a peace agreement, then the location of semi-permanent demobilization sites may have already been agreed. If agreement has not been reached, the parties to the conflict should be involved in selecting locations. The following factors should be taken into account in the selection of locations for semi-permanent demobilization sites: \\n Accessibility: The site should be easily accessible. Distance to roads, airfields, rivers and railways should be considered. Locations and routes for medical and obstetric emergency referral must be identified, and there should be sufficient capacity for referral or medical evacuation to address any emergencies that may arise. Accessibility allowing national or international military forces to secure the site and for logistic and supply lines is extremely important. The effects of weather changes (e.g., the start of the rainy season) should be considered when assessing accessibility. \\n Security: Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups should feel and be safe in the selected location. When establishing sites, it is important to consider the general political and military environment, as well as how vulnerable DDR participants are to potential threats, including cross-border violence and retaliation by active armed forces and groups. The security of nearby communities must also be taken into account. \\n Local communities: DDR practitioners should adequately liaise with local leaders and national and international military forces to ensure that nearby communities are not adversely affected by the demobilization site or operation. \\n General amenities: Demobilization sites should be chosen with the following needs taken into account: potable water supply, washing and toilet facilities (separate facilities for men and women, with locks and lighting if they will be used after dark), drainage for rain and waste, flooding potential and the natural water course, local power and food supply, environmental hazards, pollution, infestation, cooking and eating facilities, lighting both for security and functionality, and, finally, facility space for recreation, including sports. Special arrangements\/contingency plans should be made for children, persons with disabilities, persons with chronic illnesses, and pregnant or lactating women. \\n Storage facilities\/armoury: If disarmament and demobilization are to take place at the same site, secure and guarded facilities\/armouries for temporary storage of collected weapons shall be set up (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \\n Communications infrastructure: The site should be located in an area suitable for radio and\/or telecommunications infrastructure.", + "Paragraph": "If the DDR programme has been negotiated within the framework of a peace agreement, then the location of semi-permanent demobilization sites may have already been agreed. If agreement has not been reached, the parties to the conflict should be involved in selecting locations. The following factors should be taken into account in the selection of locations for semi-permanent demobilization sites: \n Accessibility: The site should be easily accessible. Distance to roads, airfields, rivers and railways should be considered. Locations and routes for medical and obstetric emergency referral must be identified, and there should be sufficient capacity for referral or medical evacuation to address any emergencies that may arise. Accessibility allowing national or international military forces to secure the site and for logistic and supply lines is extremely important. The effects of weather changes (e.g., the start of the rainy season) should be considered when assessing accessibility. \n Security: Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups should feel and be safe in the selected location. When establishing sites, it is important to consider the general political and military environment, as well as how vulnerable DDR participants are to potential threats, including cross-border violence and retaliation by active armed forces and groups. The security of nearby communities must also be taken into account. \n Local communities: DDR practitioners should adequately liaise with local leaders and national and international military forces to ensure that nearby communities are not adversely affected by the demobilization site or operation. \n General amenities: Demobilization sites should be chosen with the following needs taken into account: potable water supply, washing and toilet facilities (separate facilities for men and women, with locks and lighting if they will be used after dark), drainage for rain and waste, flooding potential and the natural water course, local power and food supply, environmental hazards, pollution, infestation, cooking and eating facilities, lighting both for security and functionality, and, finally, facility space for recreation, including sports. Special arrangements\/contingency plans should be made for children, persons with disabilities, persons with chronic illnesses, and pregnant or lactating women. \n Storage facilities\/armoury: If disarmament and demobilization are to take place at the same site, secure and guarded facilities\/armouries for temporary storage of collected weapons shall be set up (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \n Communications infrastructure: The site should be located in an area suitable for radio and\/or telecommunications infrastructure.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -83773,7 +83773,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1470, - "Paragraph": "If the DDR programme has been negotiated within the framework of a peace agreement, then the location of semi-permanent demobilization sites may have already been agreed. If agreement has not been reached, the parties to the conflict should be involved in selecting locations. The following factors should be taken into account in the selection of locations for semi-permanent demobilization sites: \\n Accessibility: The site should be easily accessible. Distance to roads, airfields, rivers and railways should be considered. Locations and routes for medical and obstetric emergency referral must be identified, and there should be sufficient capacity for referral or medical evacuation to address any emergencies that may arise. Accessibility allowing national or international military forces to secure the site and for logistic and supply lines is extremely important. The effects of weather changes (e.g., the start of the rainy season) should be considered when assessing accessibility. \\n Security: Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups should feel and be safe in the selected location. When establishing sites, it is important to consider the general political and military environment, as well as how vulnerable DDR participants are to potential threats, including cross-border violence and retaliation by active armed forces and groups. The security of nearby communities must also be taken into account. \\n Local communities: DDR practitioners should adequately liaise with local leaders and national and international military forces to ensure that nearby communities are not adversely affected by the demobilization site or operation. \\n General amenities: Demobilization sites should be chosen with the following needs taken into account: potable water supply, washing and toilet facilities (separate facilities for men and women, with locks and lighting if they will be used after dark), drainage for rain and waste, flooding potential and the natural water course, local power and food supply, environmental hazards, pollution, infestation, cooking and eating facilities, lighting both for security and functionality, and, finally, facility space for recreation, including sports. Special arrangements\/contingency plans should be made for children, persons with disabilities, persons with chronic illnesses, and pregnant or lactating women. \\n Storage facilities\/armoury: If disarmament and demobilization are to take place at the same site, secure and guarded facilities\/armouries for temporary storage of collected weapons shall be set up (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \\n Communications infrastructure: The site should be located in an area suitable for radio and\/or telecommunications infrastructure.", + "Paragraph": "If the DDR programme has been negotiated within the framework of a peace agreement, then the location of semi-permanent demobilization sites may have already been agreed. If agreement has not been reached, the parties to the conflict should be involved in selecting locations. The following factors should be taken into account in the selection of locations for semi-permanent demobilization sites: \n Accessibility: The site should be easily accessible. Distance to roads, airfields, rivers and railways should be considered. Locations and routes for medical and obstetric emergency referral must be identified, and there should be sufficient capacity for referral or medical evacuation to address any emergencies that may arise. Accessibility allowing national or international military forces to secure the site and for logistic and supply lines is extremely important. The effects of weather changes (e.g., the start of the rainy season) should be considered when assessing accessibility. \n Security: Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups should feel and be safe in the selected location. When establishing sites, it is important to consider the general political and military environment, as well as how vulnerable DDR participants are to potential threats, including cross-border violence and retaliation by active armed forces and groups. The security of nearby communities must also be taken into account. \n Local communities: DDR practitioners should adequately liaise with local leaders and national and international military forces to ensure that nearby communities are not adversely affected by the demobilization site or operation. \n General amenities: Demobilization sites should be chosen with the following needs taken into account: potable water supply, washing and toilet facilities (separate facilities for men and women, with locks and lighting if they will be used after dark), drainage for rain and waste, flooding potential and the natural water course, local power and food supply, environmental hazards, pollution, infestation, cooking and eating facilities, lighting both for security and functionality, and, finally, facility space for recreation, including sports. Special arrangements\/contingency plans should be made for children, persons with disabilities, persons with chronic illnesses, and pregnant or lactating women. \n Storage facilities\/armoury: If disarmament and demobilization are to take place at the same site, secure and guarded facilities\/armouries for temporary storage of collected weapons shall be set up (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \n Communications infrastructure: The site should be located in an area suitable for radio and\/or telecommunications infrastructure.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -83784,14 +83784,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Demobilization sites", "Heading3": "5.3.3 Location", "Heading4": "Semi-permanent demobilization sites", - "Sentence": "\\n Local communities: DDR practitioners should adequately liaise with local leaders and national and international military forces to ensure that nearby communities are not adversely affected by the demobilization site or operation.", + "Sentence": "\n Local communities: DDR practitioners should adequately liaise with local leaders and national and international military forces to ensure that nearby communities are not adversely affected by the demobilization site or operation.", "newParagraph": "ddr programme negotiated within framework peace agreement location semipermanent demobilization site may already agreed agreement reached party conflict involved selecting location following factor taken account selection location semipermanent demobilization site n accessibility site easily accessible distance road airfield river railway considered location route medical obstetric emergency referral must identified sufficient capacity referral medical evacuation address emergency may arise accessibility allowing national international military force secure site logistic supply line extremely important effect weather change eg start rainy season considered assessing accessibility n security excombatants person formerly associated armed force group feel safe selected location establishing site important consider general political military environment well vulnerable ddr participant potential threat including crossborder violence retaliation active armed force group security nearby community must also taken account n local community ddr practitioner adequately liaise local leader national international military force ensure nearby community adversely affected demobilization site operation n general amenity demobilization site chosen following need taken account potable water supply washing toilet facility separate facility men woman lock lighting used dark drainage rain waste flooding potential natural water course local power food supply environmental hazard pollution infestation cooking eating facility lighting security functionality finally facility space recreation including sport special arrangementscontingency plan made child person disability person chronic illness pregnant lactating woman n storage facilitiesarmoury disarmament demobilization take place site secure guarded facilitiesarmouries temporary storage collected weapon shall set see iddrs 410 disarmament n communication infrastructure site located area suitable radio andor telecommunication infrastructure", "ProcessedSent": "n local community ddr practitioner adequately liaise local leader national international military force ensure nearby community adversely affected demobilization site operation", "SentID": 4654 }, { "ParagraphID": 1470, - "Paragraph": "If the DDR programme has been negotiated within the framework of a peace agreement, then the location of semi-permanent demobilization sites may have already been agreed. If agreement has not been reached, the parties to the conflict should be involved in selecting locations. The following factors should be taken into account in the selection of locations for semi-permanent demobilization sites: \\n Accessibility: The site should be easily accessible. Distance to roads, airfields, rivers and railways should be considered. Locations and routes for medical and obstetric emergency referral must be identified, and there should be sufficient capacity for referral or medical evacuation to address any emergencies that may arise. Accessibility allowing national or international military forces to secure the site and for logistic and supply lines is extremely important. The effects of weather changes (e.g., the start of the rainy season) should be considered when assessing accessibility. \\n Security: Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups should feel and be safe in the selected location. When establishing sites, it is important to consider the general political and military environment, as well as how vulnerable DDR participants are to potential threats, including cross-border violence and retaliation by active armed forces and groups. The security of nearby communities must also be taken into account. \\n Local communities: DDR practitioners should adequately liaise with local leaders and national and international military forces to ensure that nearby communities are not adversely affected by the demobilization site or operation. \\n General amenities: Demobilization sites should be chosen with the following needs taken into account: potable water supply, washing and toilet facilities (separate facilities for men and women, with locks and lighting if they will be used after dark), drainage for rain and waste, flooding potential and the natural water course, local power and food supply, environmental hazards, pollution, infestation, cooking and eating facilities, lighting both for security and functionality, and, finally, facility space for recreation, including sports. Special arrangements\/contingency plans should be made for children, persons with disabilities, persons with chronic illnesses, and pregnant or lactating women. \\n Storage facilities\/armoury: If disarmament and demobilization are to take place at the same site, secure and guarded facilities\/armouries for temporary storage of collected weapons shall be set up (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \\n Communications infrastructure: The site should be located in an area suitable for radio and\/or telecommunications infrastructure.", + "Paragraph": "If the DDR programme has been negotiated within the framework of a peace agreement, then the location of semi-permanent demobilization sites may have already been agreed. If agreement has not been reached, the parties to the conflict should be involved in selecting locations. The following factors should be taken into account in the selection of locations for semi-permanent demobilization sites: \n Accessibility: The site should be easily accessible. Distance to roads, airfields, rivers and railways should be considered. Locations and routes for medical and obstetric emergency referral must be identified, and there should be sufficient capacity for referral or medical evacuation to address any emergencies that may arise. Accessibility allowing national or international military forces to secure the site and for logistic and supply lines is extremely important. The effects of weather changes (e.g., the start of the rainy season) should be considered when assessing accessibility. \n Security: Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups should feel and be safe in the selected location. When establishing sites, it is important to consider the general political and military environment, as well as how vulnerable DDR participants are to potential threats, including cross-border violence and retaliation by active armed forces and groups. The security of nearby communities must also be taken into account. \n Local communities: DDR practitioners should adequately liaise with local leaders and national and international military forces to ensure that nearby communities are not adversely affected by the demobilization site or operation. \n General amenities: Demobilization sites should be chosen with the following needs taken into account: potable water supply, washing and toilet facilities (separate facilities for men and women, with locks and lighting if they will be used after dark), drainage for rain and waste, flooding potential and the natural water course, local power and food supply, environmental hazards, pollution, infestation, cooking and eating facilities, lighting both for security and functionality, and, finally, facility space for recreation, including sports. Special arrangements\/contingency plans should be made for children, persons with disabilities, persons with chronic illnesses, and pregnant or lactating women. \n Storage facilities\/armoury: If disarmament and demobilization are to take place at the same site, secure and guarded facilities\/armouries for temporary storage of collected weapons shall be set up (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \n Communications infrastructure: The site should be located in an area suitable for radio and\/or telecommunications infrastructure.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -83802,14 +83802,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Demobilization sites", "Heading3": "5.3.3 Location", "Heading4": "Semi-permanent demobilization sites", - "Sentence": "\\n General amenities: Demobilization sites should be chosen with the following needs taken into account: potable water supply, washing and toilet facilities (separate facilities for men and women, with locks and lighting if they will be used after dark), drainage for rain and waste, flooding potential and the natural water course, local power and food supply, environmental hazards, pollution, infestation, cooking and eating facilities, lighting both for security and functionality, and, finally, facility space for recreation, including sports.", + "Sentence": "\n General amenities: Demobilization sites should be chosen with the following needs taken into account: potable water supply, washing and toilet facilities (separate facilities for men and women, with locks and lighting if they will be used after dark), drainage for rain and waste, flooding potential and the natural water course, local power and food supply, environmental hazards, pollution, infestation, cooking and eating facilities, lighting both for security and functionality, and, finally, facility space for recreation, including sports.", "newParagraph": "ddr programme negotiated within framework peace agreement location semipermanent demobilization site may already agreed agreement reached party conflict involved selecting location following factor taken account selection location semipermanent demobilization site n accessibility site easily accessible distance road airfield river railway considered location route medical obstetric emergency referral must identified sufficient capacity referral medical evacuation address emergency may arise accessibility allowing national international military force secure site logistic supply line extremely important effect weather change eg start rainy season considered assessing accessibility n security excombatants person formerly associated armed force group feel safe selected location establishing site important consider general political military environment well vulnerable ddr participant potential threat including crossborder violence retaliation active armed force group security nearby community must also taken account n local community ddr practitioner adequately liaise local leader national international military force ensure nearby community adversely affected demobilization site operation n general amenity demobilization site chosen following need taken account potable water supply washing toilet facility separate facility men woman lock lighting used dark drainage rain waste flooding potential natural water course local power food supply environmental hazard pollution infestation cooking eating facility lighting security functionality finally facility space recreation including sport special arrangementscontingency plan made child person disability person chronic illness pregnant lactating woman n storage facilitiesarmoury disarmament demobilization take place site secure guarded facilitiesarmouries temporary storage collected weapon shall set see iddrs 410 disarmament n communication infrastructure site located area suitable radio andor telecommunication infrastructure", "ProcessedSent": "n general amenity demobilization site chosen following need taken account potable water supply washing toilet facility separate facility men woman lock lighting used dark drainage rain waste flooding potential natural water course local power food supply environmental hazard pollution infestation cooking eating facility lighting security functionality finally facility space recreation including sport", "SentID": 4655 }, { "ParagraphID": 1470, - "Paragraph": "If the DDR programme has been negotiated within the framework of a peace agreement, then the location of semi-permanent demobilization sites may have already been agreed. If agreement has not been reached, the parties to the conflict should be involved in selecting locations. The following factors should be taken into account in the selection of locations for semi-permanent demobilization sites: \\n Accessibility: The site should be easily accessible. Distance to roads, airfields, rivers and railways should be considered. Locations and routes for medical and obstetric emergency referral must be identified, and there should be sufficient capacity for referral or medical evacuation to address any emergencies that may arise. Accessibility allowing national or international military forces to secure the site and for logistic and supply lines is extremely important. The effects of weather changes (e.g., the start of the rainy season) should be considered when assessing accessibility. \\n Security: Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups should feel and be safe in the selected location. When establishing sites, it is important to consider the general political and military environment, as well as how vulnerable DDR participants are to potential threats, including cross-border violence and retaliation by active armed forces and groups. The security of nearby communities must also be taken into account. \\n Local communities: DDR practitioners should adequately liaise with local leaders and national and international military forces to ensure that nearby communities are not adversely affected by the demobilization site or operation. \\n General amenities: Demobilization sites should be chosen with the following needs taken into account: potable water supply, washing and toilet facilities (separate facilities for men and women, with locks and lighting if they will be used after dark), drainage for rain and waste, flooding potential and the natural water course, local power and food supply, environmental hazards, pollution, infestation, cooking and eating facilities, lighting both for security and functionality, and, finally, facility space for recreation, including sports. Special arrangements\/contingency plans should be made for children, persons with disabilities, persons with chronic illnesses, and pregnant or lactating women. \\n Storage facilities\/armoury: If disarmament and demobilization are to take place at the same site, secure and guarded facilities\/armouries for temporary storage of collected weapons shall be set up (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \\n Communications infrastructure: The site should be located in an area suitable for radio and\/or telecommunications infrastructure.", + "Paragraph": "If the DDR programme has been negotiated within the framework of a peace agreement, then the location of semi-permanent demobilization sites may have already been agreed. If agreement has not been reached, the parties to the conflict should be involved in selecting locations. The following factors should be taken into account in the selection of locations for semi-permanent demobilization sites: \n Accessibility: The site should be easily accessible. Distance to roads, airfields, rivers and railways should be considered. Locations and routes for medical and obstetric emergency referral must be identified, and there should be sufficient capacity for referral or medical evacuation to address any emergencies that may arise. Accessibility allowing national or international military forces to secure the site and for logistic and supply lines is extremely important. The effects of weather changes (e.g., the start of the rainy season) should be considered when assessing accessibility. \n Security: Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups should feel and be safe in the selected location. When establishing sites, it is important to consider the general political and military environment, as well as how vulnerable DDR participants are to potential threats, including cross-border violence and retaliation by active armed forces and groups. The security of nearby communities must also be taken into account. \n Local communities: DDR practitioners should adequately liaise with local leaders and national and international military forces to ensure that nearby communities are not adversely affected by the demobilization site or operation. \n General amenities: Demobilization sites should be chosen with the following needs taken into account: potable water supply, washing and toilet facilities (separate facilities for men and women, with locks and lighting if they will be used after dark), drainage for rain and waste, flooding potential and the natural water course, local power and food supply, environmental hazards, pollution, infestation, cooking and eating facilities, lighting both for security and functionality, and, finally, facility space for recreation, including sports. Special arrangements\/contingency plans should be made for children, persons with disabilities, persons with chronic illnesses, and pregnant or lactating women. \n Storage facilities\/armoury: If disarmament and demobilization are to take place at the same site, secure and guarded facilities\/armouries for temporary storage of collected weapons shall be set up (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \n Communications infrastructure: The site should be located in an area suitable for radio and\/or telecommunications infrastructure.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -83827,7 +83827,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1470, - "Paragraph": "If the DDR programme has been negotiated within the framework of a peace agreement, then the location of semi-permanent demobilization sites may have already been agreed. If agreement has not been reached, the parties to the conflict should be involved in selecting locations. The following factors should be taken into account in the selection of locations for semi-permanent demobilization sites: \\n Accessibility: The site should be easily accessible. Distance to roads, airfields, rivers and railways should be considered. Locations and routes for medical and obstetric emergency referral must be identified, and there should be sufficient capacity for referral or medical evacuation to address any emergencies that may arise. Accessibility allowing national or international military forces to secure the site and for logistic and supply lines is extremely important. The effects of weather changes (e.g., the start of the rainy season) should be considered when assessing accessibility. \\n Security: Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups should feel and be safe in the selected location. When establishing sites, it is important to consider the general political and military environment, as well as how vulnerable DDR participants are to potential threats, including cross-border violence and retaliation by active armed forces and groups. The security of nearby communities must also be taken into account. \\n Local communities: DDR practitioners should adequately liaise with local leaders and national and international military forces to ensure that nearby communities are not adversely affected by the demobilization site or operation. \\n General amenities: Demobilization sites should be chosen with the following needs taken into account: potable water supply, washing and toilet facilities (separate facilities for men and women, with locks and lighting if they will be used after dark), drainage for rain and waste, flooding potential and the natural water course, local power and food supply, environmental hazards, pollution, infestation, cooking and eating facilities, lighting both for security and functionality, and, finally, facility space for recreation, including sports. Special arrangements\/contingency plans should be made for children, persons with disabilities, persons with chronic illnesses, and pregnant or lactating women. \\n Storage facilities\/armoury: If disarmament and demobilization are to take place at the same site, secure and guarded facilities\/armouries for temporary storage of collected weapons shall be set up (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \\n Communications infrastructure: The site should be located in an area suitable for radio and\/or telecommunications infrastructure.", + "Paragraph": "If the DDR programme has been negotiated within the framework of a peace agreement, then the location of semi-permanent demobilization sites may have already been agreed. If agreement has not been reached, the parties to the conflict should be involved in selecting locations. The following factors should be taken into account in the selection of locations for semi-permanent demobilization sites: \n Accessibility: The site should be easily accessible. Distance to roads, airfields, rivers and railways should be considered. Locations and routes for medical and obstetric emergency referral must be identified, and there should be sufficient capacity for referral or medical evacuation to address any emergencies that may arise. Accessibility allowing national or international military forces to secure the site and for logistic and supply lines is extremely important. The effects of weather changes (e.g., the start of the rainy season) should be considered when assessing accessibility. \n Security: Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups should feel and be safe in the selected location. When establishing sites, it is important to consider the general political and military environment, as well as how vulnerable DDR participants are to potential threats, including cross-border violence and retaliation by active armed forces and groups. The security of nearby communities must also be taken into account. \n Local communities: DDR practitioners should adequately liaise with local leaders and national and international military forces to ensure that nearby communities are not adversely affected by the demobilization site or operation. \n General amenities: Demobilization sites should be chosen with the following needs taken into account: potable water supply, washing and toilet facilities (separate facilities for men and women, with locks and lighting if they will be used after dark), drainage for rain and waste, flooding potential and the natural water course, local power and food supply, environmental hazards, pollution, infestation, cooking and eating facilities, lighting both for security and functionality, and, finally, facility space for recreation, including sports. Special arrangements\/contingency plans should be made for children, persons with disabilities, persons with chronic illnesses, and pregnant or lactating women. \n Storage facilities\/armoury: If disarmament and demobilization are to take place at the same site, secure and guarded facilities\/armouries for temporary storage of collected weapons shall be set up (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \n Communications infrastructure: The site should be located in an area suitable for radio and\/or telecommunications infrastructure.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -83838,14 +83838,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Demobilization sites", "Heading3": "5.3.3 Location", "Heading4": "Semi-permanent demobilization sites", - "Sentence": "\\n Storage facilities\/armoury: If disarmament and demobilization are to take place at the same site, secure and guarded facilities\/armouries for temporary storage of collected weapons shall be set up (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament).", + "Sentence": "\n Storage facilities\/armoury: If disarmament and demobilization are to take place at the same site, secure and guarded facilities\/armouries for temporary storage of collected weapons shall be set up (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament).", "newParagraph": "ddr programme negotiated within framework peace agreement location semipermanent demobilization site may already agreed agreement reached party conflict involved selecting location following factor taken account selection location semipermanent demobilization site n accessibility site easily accessible distance road airfield river railway considered location route medical obstetric emergency referral must identified sufficient capacity referral medical evacuation address emergency may arise accessibility allowing national international military force secure site logistic supply line extremely important effect weather change eg start rainy season considered assessing accessibility n security excombatants person formerly associated armed force group feel safe selected location establishing site important consider general political military environment well vulnerable ddr participant potential threat including crossborder violence retaliation active armed force group security nearby community must also taken account n local community ddr practitioner adequately liaise local leader national international military force ensure nearby community adversely affected demobilization site operation n general amenity demobilization site chosen following need taken account potable water supply washing toilet facility separate facility men woman lock lighting used dark drainage rain waste flooding potential natural water course local power food supply environmental hazard pollution infestation cooking eating facility lighting security functionality finally facility space recreation including sport special arrangementscontingency plan made child person disability person chronic illness pregnant lactating woman n storage facilitiesarmoury disarmament demobilization take place site secure guarded facilitiesarmouries temporary storage collected weapon shall set see iddrs 410 disarmament n communication infrastructure site located area suitable radio andor telecommunication infrastructure", "ProcessedSent": "n storage facilitiesarmoury disarmament demobilization take place site secure guarded facilitiesarmouries temporary storage collected weapon shall set see iddrs 410 disarmament", "SentID": 4657 }, { "ParagraphID": 1470, - "Paragraph": "If the DDR programme has been negotiated within the framework of a peace agreement, then the location of semi-permanent demobilization sites may have already been agreed. If agreement has not been reached, the parties to the conflict should be involved in selecting locations. The following factors should be taken into account in the selection of locations for semi-permanent demobilization sites: \\n Accessibility: The site should be easily accessible. Distance to roads, airfields, rivers and railways should be considered. Locations and routes for medical and obstetric emergency referral must be identified, and there should be sufficient capacity for referral or medical evacuation to address any emergencies that may arise. Accessibility allowing national or international military forces to secure the site and for logistic and supply lines is extremely important. The effects of weather changes (e.g., the start of the rainy season) should be considered when assessing accessibility. \\n Security: Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups should feel and be safe in the selected location. When establishing sites, it is important to consider the general political and military environment, as well as how vulnerable DDR participants are to potential threats, including cross-border violence and retaliation by active armed forces and groups. The security of nearby communities must also be taken into account. \\n Local communities: DDR practitioners should adequately liaise with local leaders and national and international military forces to ensure that nearby communities are not adversely affected by the demobilization site or operation. \\n General amenities: Demobilization sites should be chosen with the following needs taken into account: potable water supply, washing and toilet facilities (separate facilities for men and women, with locks and lighting if they will be used after dark), drainage for rain and waste, flooding potential and the natural water course, local power and food supply, environmental hazards, pollution, infestation, cooking and eating facilities, lighting both for security and functionality, and, finally, facility space for recreation, including sports. Special arrangements\/contingency plans should be made for children, persons with disabilities, persons with chronic illnesses, and pregnant or lactating women. \\n Storage facilities\/armoury: If disarmament and demobilization are to take place at the same site, secure and guarded facilities\/armouries for temporary storage of collected weapons shall be set up (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \\n Communications infrastructure: The site should be located in an area suitable for radio and\/or telecommunications infrastructure.", + "Paragraph": "If the DDR programme has been negotiated within the framework of a peace agreement, then the location of semi-permanent demobilization sites may have already been agreed. If agreement has not been reached, the parties to the conflict should be involved in selecting locations. The following factors should be taken into account in the selection of locations for semi-permanent demobilization sites: \n Accessibility: The site should be easily accessible. Distance to roads, airfields, rivers and railways should be considered. Locations and routes for medical and obstetric emergency referral must be identified, and there should be sufficient capacity for referral or medical evacuation to address any emergencies that may arise. Accessibility allowing national or international military forces to secure the site and for logistic and supply lines is extremely important. The effects of weather changes (e.g., the start of the rainy season) should be considered when assessing accessibility. \n Security: Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups should feel and be safe in the selected location. When establishing sites, it is important to consider the general political and military environment, as well as how vulnerable DDR participants are to potential threats, including cross-border violence and retaliation by active armed forces and groups. The security of nearby communities must also be taken into account. \n Local communities: DDR practitioners should adequately liaise with local leaders and national and international military forces to ensure that nearby communities are not adversely affected by the demobilization site or operation. \n General amenities: Demobilization sites should be chosen with the following needs taken into account: potable water supply, washing and toilet facilities (separate facilities for men and women, with locks and lighting if they will be used after dark), drainage for rain and waste, flooding potential and the natural water course, local power and food supply, environmental hazards, pollution, infestation, cooking and eating facilities, lighting both for security and functionality, and, finally, facility space for recreation, including sports. Special arrangements\/contingency plans should be made for children, persons with disabilities, persons with chronic illnesses, and pregnant or lactating women. \n Storage facilities\/armoury: If disarmament and demobilization are to take place at the same site, secure and guarded facilities\/armouries for temporary storage of collected weapons shall be set up (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). \n Communications infrastructure: The site should be located in an area suitable for radio and\/or telecommunications infrastructure.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -83856,7 +83856,7 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Demobilization sites", "Heading3": "5.3.3 Location", "Heading4": "Semi-permanent demobilization sites", - "Sentence": "\\n Communications infrastructure: The site should be located in an area suitable for radio and\/or telecommunications infrastructure.", + "Sentence": "\n Communications infrastructure: The site should be located in an area suitable for radio and\/or telecommunications infrastructure.", "newParagraph": "ddr programme negotiated within framework peace agreement location semipermanent demobilization site may already agreed agreement reached party conflict involved selecting location following factor taken account selection location semipermanent demobilization site n accessibility site easily accessible distance road airfield river railway considered location route medical obstetric emergency referral must identified sufficient capacity referral medical evacuation address emergency may arise accessibility allowing national international military force secure site logistic supply line extremely important effect weather change eg start rainy season considered assessing accessibility n security excombatants person formerly associated armed force group feel safe selected location establishing site important consider general political military environment well vulnerable ddr participant potential threat including crossborder violence retaliation active armed force group security nearby community must also taken account n local community ddr practitioner adequately liaise local leader national international military force ensure nearby community adversely affected demobilization site operation n general amenity demobilization site chosen following need taken account potable water supply washing toilet facility separate facility men woman lock lighting used dark drainage rain waste flooding potential natural water course local power food supply environmental hazard pollution infestation cooking eating facility lighting security functionality finally facility space recreation including sport special arrangementscontingency plan made child person disability person chronic illness pregnant lactating woman n storage facilitiesarmoury disarmament demobilization take place site secure guarded facilitiesarmouries temporary storage collected weapon shall set see iddrs 410 disarmament n communication infrastructure site located area suitable radio andor telecommunication infrastructure", "ProcessedSent": "n communication infrastructure site located area suitable radio andor telecommunication infrastructure", "SentID": 4658 @@ -83989,7 +83989,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1472, - "Paragraph": "When temporary demobilization sites are being used, it is particularly important to agree, in advance, on the distribution of tasks, financial responsibilities and the post-DDR ownership of the location. Where relevant, the following should also be considered: \\n The refurbishment and temporary use of community property: If available in the area where the demobilization site is to be set up, the use of existing hard-walled property should be considered. The decision should be made by weighing the medium- and long-term benefits to the community of repairing local facilities against the overall security and financial implications. These installations may not need rebuilding, and may be made usable by adding plastic sheeting, concertina wire, etc. Possible sites include disused factories, warehouses, hospitals, colleges and farms. Efforts should be made to verify ownership and to avoid legal complications. \\n The refurbishment and temporary use of state\/military property: Where regular armed forces or well-organized\/disciplined armed groups are to be demobilized, the use of existing military barracks, with the agreement of national authorities, should be considered. Generally speaking, these facilities should offer a degree of security and may have the required infrastructure already in place. The same security and administrative arrangements should apply to these sites as to others.", + "Paragraph": "When temporary demobilization sites are being used, it is particularly important to agree, in advance, on the distribution of tasks, financial responsibilities and the post-DDR ownership of the location. Where relevant, the following should also be considered: \n The refurbishment and temporary use of community property: If available in the area where the demobilization site is to be set up, the use of existing hard-walled property should be considered. The decision should be made by weighing the medium- and long-term benefits to the community of repairing local facilities against the overall security and financial implications. These installations may not need rebuilding, and may be made usable by adding plastic sheeting, concertina wire, etc. Possible sites include disused factories, warehouses, hospitals, colleges and farms. Efforts should be made to verify ownership and to avoid legal complications. \n The refurbishment and temporary use of state\/military property: Where regular armed forces or well-organized\/disciplined armed groups are to be demobilized, the use of existing military barracks, with the agreement of national authorities, should be considered. Generally speaking, these facilities should offer a degree of security and may have the required infrastructure already in place. The same security and administrative arrangements should apply to these sites as to others.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -84007,7 +84007,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1472, - "Paragraph": "When temporary demobilization sites are being used, it is particularly important to agree, in advance, on the distribution of tasks, financial responsibilities and the post-DDR ownership of the location. Where relevant, the following should also be considered: \\n The refurbishment and temporary use of community property: If available in the area where the demobilization site is to be set up, the use of existing hard-walled property should be considered. The decision should be made by weighing the medium- and long-term benefits to the community of repairing local facilities against the overall security and financial implications. These installations may not need rebuilding, and may be made usable by adding plastic sheeting, concertina wire, etc. Possible sites include disused factories, warehouses, hospitals, colleges and farms. Efforts should be made to verify ownership and to avoid legal complications. \\n The refurbishment and temporary use of state\/military property: Where regular armed forces or well-organized\/disciplined armed groups are to be demobilized, the use of existing military barracks, with the agreement of national authorities, should be considered. Generally speaking, these facilities should offer a degree of security and may have the required infrastructure already in place. The same security and administrative arrangements should apply to these sites as to others.", + "Paragraph": "When temporary demobilization sites are being used, it is particularly important to agree, in advance, on the distribution of tasks, financial responsibilities and the post-DDR ownership of the location. Where relevant, the following should also be considered: \n The refurbishment and temporary use of community property: If available in the area where the demobilization site is to be set up, the use of existing hard-walled property should be considered. The decision should be made by weighing the medium- and long-term benefits to the community of repairing local facilities against the overall security and financial implications. These installations may not need rebuilding, and may be made usable by adding plastic sheeting, concertina wire, etc. Possible sites include disused factories, warehouses, hospitals, colleges and farms. Efforts should be made to verify ownership and to avoid legal complications. \n The refurbishment and temporary use of state\/military property: Where regular armed forces or well-organized\/disciplined armed groups are to be demobilized, the use of existing military barracks, with the agreement of national authorities, should be considered. Generally speaking, these facilities should offer a degree of security and may have the required infrastructure already in place. The same security and administrative arrangements should apply to these sites as to others.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -84018,14 +84018,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Demobilization sites", "Heading3": "5.3.3 Location", "Heading4": "Temporary demobilization sites", - "Sentence": "Where relevant, the following should also be considered: \\n The refurbishment and temporary use of community property: If available in the area where the demobilization site is to be set up, the use of existing hard-walled property should be considered.", + "Sentence": "Where relevant, the following should also be considered: \n The refurbishment and temporary use of community property: If available in the area where the demobilization site is to be set up, the use of existing hard-walled property should be considered.", "newParagraph": "temporary demobilization site used particularly important agree advance distribution task financial responsibility postddr ownership location relevant following also considered n refurbishment temporary use community property available area demobilization site set use existing hardwalled property considered decision made weighing medium longterm benefit community repairing local facility overall security financial implication installation may need rebuilding may made usable adding plastic sheeting concertina wire etc possible site include disused factory warehouse hospital college farm effort made verify ownership avoid legal complication n refurbishment temporary use statemilitary property regular armed force wellorganizeddisciplined armed group demobilized use existing military barrack agreement national authority considered generally speaking facility offer degree security may required infrastructure already place security administrative arrangement apply site others", "ProcessedSent": "relevant following also considered n refurbishment temporary use community property available area demobilization site set use existing hardwalled property considered", "SentID": 4667 }, { "ParagraphID": 1472, - "Paragraph": "When temporary demobilization sites are being used, it is particularly important to agree, in advance, on the distribution of tasks, financial responsibilities and the post-DDR ownership of the location. Where relevant, the following should also be considered: \\n The refurbishment and temporary use of community property: If available in the area where the demobilization site is to be set up, the use of existing hard-walled property should be considered. The decision should be made by weighing the medium- and long-term benefits to the community of repairing local facilities against the overall security and financial implications. These installations may not need rebuilding, and may be made usable by adding plastic sheeting, concertina wire, etc. Possible sites include disused factories, warehouses, hospitals, colleges and farms. Efforts should be made to verify ownership and to avoid legal complications. \\n The refurbishment and temporary use of state\/military property: Where regular armed forces or well-organized\/disciplined armed groups are to be demobilized, the use of existing military barracks, with the agreement of national authorities, should be considered. Generally speaking, these facilities should offer a degree of security and may have the required infrastructure already in place. The same security and administrative arrangements should apply to these sites as to others.", + "Paragraph": "When temporary demobilization sites are being used, it is particularly important to agree, in advance, on the distribution of tasks, financial responsibilities and the post-DDR ownership of the location. Where relevant, the following should also be considered: \n The refurbishment and temporary use of community property: If available in the area where the demobilization site is to be set up, the use of existing hard-walled property should be considered. The decision should be made by weighing the medium- and long-term benefits to the community of repairing local facilities against the overall security and financial implications. These installations may not need rebuilding, and may be made usable by adding plastic sheeting, concertina wire, etc. Possible sites include disused factories, warehouses, hospitals, colleges and farms. Efforts should be made to verify ownership and to avoid legal complications. \n The refurbishment and temporary use of state\/military property: Where regular armed forces or well-organized\/disciplined armed groups are to be demobilized, the use of existing military barracks, with the agreement of national authorities, should be considered. Generally speaking, these facilities should offer a degree of security and may have the required infrastructure already in place. The same security and administrative arrangements should apply to these sites as to others.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -84043,7 +84043,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1472, - "Paragraph": "When temporary demobilization sites are being used, it is particularly important to agree, in advance, on the distribution of tasks, financial responsibilities and the post-DDR ownership of the location. Where relevant, the following should also be considered: \\n The refurbishment and temporary use of community property: If available in the area where the demobilization site is to be set up, the use of existing hard-walled property should be considered. The decision should be made by weighing the medium- and long-term benefits to the community of repairing local facilities against the overall security and financial implications. These installations may not need rebuilding, and may be made usable by adding plastic sheeting, concertina wire, etc. Possible sites include disused factories, warehouses, hospitals, colleges and farms. Efforts should be made to verify ownership and to avoid legal complications. \\n The refurbishment and temporary use of state\/military property: Where regular armed forces or well-organized\/disciplined armed groups are to be demobilized, the use of existing military barracks, with the agreement of national authorities, should be considered. Generally speaking, these facilities should offer a degree of security and may have the required infrastructure already in place. The same security and administrative arrangements should apply to these sites as to others.", + "Paragraph": "When temporary demobilization sites are being used, it is particularly important to agree, in advance, on the distribution of tasks, financial responsibilities and the post-DDR ownership of the location. Where relevant, the following should also be considered: \n The refurbishment and temporary use of community property: If available in the area where the demobilization site is to be set up, the use of existing hard-walled property should be considered. The decision should be made by weighing the medium- and long-term benefits to the community of repairing local facilities against the overall security and financial implications. These installations may not need rebuilding, and may be made usable by adding plastic sheeting, concertina wire, etc. Possible sites include disused factories, warehouses, hospitals, colleges and farms. Efforts should be made to verify ownership and to avoid legal complications. \n The refurbishment and temporary use of state\/military property: Where regular armed forces or well-organized\/disciplined armed groups are to be demobilized, the use of existing military barracks, with the agreement of national authorities, should be considered. Generally speaking, these facilities should offer a degree of security and may have the required infrastructure already in place. The same security and administrative arrangements should apply to these sites as to others.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -84061,7 +84061,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1472, - "Paragraph": "When temporary demobilization sites are being used, it is particularly important to agree, in advance, on the distribution of tasks, financial responsibilities and the post-DDR ownership of the location. Where relevant, the following should also be considered: \\n The refurbishment and temporary use of community property: If available in the area where the demobilization site is to be set up, the use of existing hard-walled property should be considered. The decision should be made by weighing the medium- and long-term benefits to the community of repairing local facilities against the overall security and financial implications. These installations may not need rebuilding, and may be made usable by adding plastic sheeting, concertina wire, etc. Possible sites include disused factories, warehouses, hospitals, colleges and farms. Efforts should be made to verify ownership and to avoid legal complications. \\n The refurbishment and temporary use of state\/military property: Where regular armed forces or well-organized\/disciplined armed groups are to be demobilized, the use of existing military barracks, with the agreement of national authorities, should be considered. Generally speaking, these facilities should offer a degree of security and may have the required infrastructure already in place. The same security and administrative arrangements should apply to these sites as to others.", + "Paragraph": "When temporary demobilization sites are being used, it is particularly important to agree, in advance, on the distribution of tasks, financial responsibilities and the post-DDR ownership of the location. Where relevant, the following should also be considered: \n The refurbishment and temporary use of community property: If available in the area where the demobilization site is to be set up, the use of existing hard-walled property should be considered. The decision should be made by weighing the medium- and long-term benefits to the community of repairing local facilities against the overall security and financial implications. These installations may not need rebuilding, and may be made usable by adding plastic sheeting, concertina wire, etc. Possible sites include disused factories, warehouses, hospitals, colleges and farms. Efforts should be made to verify ownership and to avoid legal complications. \n The refurbishment and temporary use of state\/military property: Where regular armed forces or well-organized\/disciplined armed groups are to be demobilized, the use of existing military barracks, with the agreement of national authorities, should be considered. Generally speaking, these facilities should offer a degree of security and may have the required infrastructure already in place. The same security and administrative arrangements should apply to these sites as to others.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -84079,7 +84079,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1472, - "Paragraph": "When temporary demobilization sites are being used, it is particularly important to agree, in advance, on the distribution of tasks, financial responsibilities and the post-DDR ownership of the location. Where relevant, the following should also be considered: \\n The refurbishment and temporary use of community property: If available in the area where the demobilization site is to be set up, the use of existing hard-walled property should be considered. The decision should be made by weighing the medium- and long-term benefits to the community of repairing local facilities against the overall security and financial implications. These installations may not need rebuilding, and may be made usable by adding plastic sheeting, concertina wire, etc. Possible sites include disused factories, warehouses, hospitals, colleges and farms. Efforts should be made to verify ownership and to avoid legal complications. \\n The refurbishment and temporary use of state\/military property: Where regular armed forces or well-organized\/disciplined armed groups are to be demobilized, the use of existing military barracks, with the agreement of national authorities, should be considered. Generally speaking, these facilities should offer a degree of security and may have the required infrastructure already in place. The same security and administrative arrangements should apply to these sites as to others.", + "Paragraph": "When temporary demobilization sites are being used, it is particularly important to agree, in advance, on the distribution of tasks, financial responsibilities and the post-DDR ownership of the location. Where relevant, the following should also be considered: \n The refurbishment and temporary use of community property: If available in the area where the demobilization site is to be set up, the use of existing hard-walled property should be considered. The decision should be made by weighing the medium- and long-term benefits to the community of repairing local facilities against the overall security and financial implications. These installations may not need rebuilding, and may be made usable by adding plastic sheeting, concertina wire, etc. Possible sites include disused factories, warehouses, hospitals, colleges and farms. Efforts should be made to verify ownership and to avoid legal complications. \n The refurbishment and temporary use of state\/military property: Where regular armed forces or well-organized\/disciplined armed groups are to be demobilized, the use of existing military barracks, with the agreement of national authorities, should be considered. Generally speaking, these facilities should offer a degree of security and may have the required infrastructure already in place. The same security and administrative arrangements should apply to these sites as to others.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -84097,7 +84097,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1472, - "Paragraph": "When temporary demobilization sites are being used, it is particularly important to agree, in advance, on the distribution of tasks, financial responsibilities and the post-DDR ownership of the location. Where relevant, the following should also be considered: \\n The refurbishment and temporary use of community property: If available in the area where the demobilization site is to be set up, the use of existing hard-walled property should be considered. The decision should be made by weighing the medium- and long-term benefits to the community of repairing local facilities against the overall security and financial implications. These installations may not need rebuilding, and may be made usable by adding plastic sheeting, concertina wire, etc. Possible sites include disused factories, warehouses, hospitals, colleges and farms. Efforts should be made to verify ownership and to avoid legal complications. \\n The refurbishment and temporary use of state\/military property: Where regular armed forces or well-organized\/disciplined armed groups are to be demobilized, the use of existing military barracks, with the agreement of national authorities, should be considered. Generally speaking, these facilities should offer a degree of security and may have the required infrastructure already in place. The same security and administrative arrangements should apply to these sites as to others.", + "Paragraph": "When temporary demobilization sites are being used, it is particularly important to agree, in advance, on the distribution of tasks, financial responsibilities and the post-DDR ownership of the location. Where relevant, the following should also be considered: \n The refurbishment and temporary use of community property: If available in the area where the demobilization site is to be set up, the use of existing hard-walled property should be considered. The decision should be made by weighing the medium- and long-term benefits to the community of repairing local facilities against the overall security and financial implications. These installations may not need rebuilding, and may be made usable by adding plastic sheeting, concertina wire, etc. Possible sites include disused factories, warehouses, hospitals, colleges and farms. Efforts should be made to verify ownership and to avoid legal complications. \n The refurbishment and temporary use of state\/military property: Where regular armed forces or well-organized\/disciplined armed groups are to be demobilized, the use of existing military barracks, with the agreement of national authorities, should be considered. Generally speaking, these facilities should offer a degree of security and may have the required infrastructure already in place. The same security and administrative arrangements should apply to these sites as to others.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -84108,14 +84108,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Demobilization sites", "Heading3": "5.3.3 Location", "Heading4": "Temporary demobilization sites", - "Sentence": "\\n The refurbishment and temporary use of state\/military property: Where regular armed forces or well-organized\/disciplined armed groups are to be demobilized, the use of existing military barracks, with the agreement of national authorities, should be considered.", + "Sentence": "\n The refurbishment and temporary use of state\/military property: Where regular armed forces or well-organized\/disciplined armed groups are to be demobilized, the use of existing military barracks, with the agreement of national authorities, should be considered.", "newParagraph": "temporary demobilization site used particularly important agree advance distribution task financial responsibility postddr ownership location relevant following also considered n refurbishment temporary use community property available area demobilization site set use existing hardwalled property considered decision made weighing medium longterm benefit community repairing local facility overall security financial implication installation may need rebuilding may made usable adding plastic sheeting concertina wire etc possible site include disused factory warehouse hospital college farm effort made verify ownership avoid legal complication n refurbishment temporary use statemilitary property regular armed force wellorganizeddisciplined armed group demobilized use existing military barrack agreement national authority considered generally speaking facility offer degree security may required infrastructure already place security administrative arrangement apply site others", "ProcessedSent": "n refurbishment temporary use statemilitary property regular armed force wellorganizeddisciplined armed group demobilized use existing military barrack agreement national authority considered", "SentID": 4672 }, { "ParagraphID": 1472, - "Paragraph": "When temporary demobilization sites are being used, it is particularly important to agree, in advance, on the distribution of tasks, financial responsibilities and the post-DDR ownership of the location. Where relevant, the following should also be considered: \\n The refurbishment and temporary use of community property: If available in the area where the demobilization site is to be set up, the use of existing hard-walled property should be considered. The decision should be made by weighing the medium- and long-term benefits to the community of repairing local facilities against the overall security and financial implications. These installations may not need rebuilding, and may be made usable by adding plastic sheeting, concertina wire, etc. Possible sites include disused factories, warehouses, hospitals, colleges and farms. Efforts should be made to verify ownership and to avoid legal complications. \\n The refurbishment and temporary use of state\/military property: Where regular armed forces or well-organized\/disciplined armed groups are to be demobilized, the use of existing military barracks, with the agreement of national authorities, should be considered. Generally speaking, these facilities should offer a degree of security and may have the required infrastructure already in place. The same security and administrative arrangements should apply to these sites as to others.", + "Paragraph": "When temporary demobilization sites are being used, it is particularly important to agree, in advance, on the distribution of tasks, financial responsibilities and the post-DDR ownership of the location. Where relevant, the following should also be considered: \n The refurbishment and temporary use of community property: If available in the area where the demobilization site is to be set up, the use of existing hard-walled property should be considered. The decision should be made by weighing the medium- and long-term benefits to the community of repairing local facilities against the overall security and financial implications. These installations may not need rebuilding, and may be made usable by adding plastic sheeting, concertina wire, etc. Possible sites include disused factories, warehouses, hospitals, colleges and farms. Efforts should be made to verify ownership and to avoid legal complications. \n The refurbishment and temporary use of state\/military property: Where regular armed forces or well-organized\/disciplined armed groups are to be demobilized, the use of existing military barracks, with the agreement of national authorities, should be considered. Generally speaking, these facilities should offer a degree of security and may have the required infrastructure already in place. The same security and administrative arrangements should apply to these sites as to others.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -84133,7 +84133,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1472, - "Paragraph": "When temporary demobilization sites are being used, it is particularly important to agree, in advance, on the distribution of tasks, financial responsibilities and the post-DDR ownership of the location. Where relevant, the following should also be considered: \\n The refurbishment and temporary use of community property: If available in the area where the demobilization site is to be set up, the use of existing hard-walled property should be considered. The decision should be made by weighing the medium- and long-term benefits to the community of repairing local facilities against the overall security and financial implications. These installations may not need rebuilding, and may be made usable by adding plastic sheeting, concertina wire, etc. Possible sites include disused factories, warehouses, hospitals, colleges and farms. Efforts should be made to verify ownership and to avoid legal complications. \\n The refurbishment and temporary use of state\/military property: Where regular armed forces or well-organized\/disciplined armed groups are to be demobilized, the use of existing military barracks, with the agreement of national authorities, should be considered. Generally speaking, these facilities should offer a degree of security and may have the required infrastructure already in place. The same security and administrative arrangements should apply to these sites as to others.", + "Paragraph": "When temporary demobilization sites are being used, it is particularly important to agree, in advance, on the distribution of tasks, financial responsibilities and the post-DDR ownership of the location. Where relevant, the following should also be considered: \n The refurbishment and temporary use of community property: If available in the area where the demobilization site is to be set up, the use of existing hard-walled property should be considered. The decision should be made by weighing the medium- and long-term benefits to the community of repairing local facilities against the overall security and financial implications. These installations may not need rebuilding, and may be made usable by adding plastic sheeting, concertina wire, etc. Possible sites include disused factories, warehouses, hospitals, colleges and farms. Efforts should be made to verify ownership and to avoid legal complications. \n The refurbishment and temporary use of state\/military property: Where regular armed forces or well-organized\/disciplined armed groups are to be demobilized, the use of existing military barracks, with the agreement of national authorities, should be considered. Generally speaking, these facilities should offer a degree of security and may have the required infrastructure already in place. The same security and administrative arrangements should apply to these sites as to others.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -84547,7 +84547,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1477, - "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \\n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \\n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \\n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \\n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \\n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \\n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", + "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -84565,7 +84565,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1477, - "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \\n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \\n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \\n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \\n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \\n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \\n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", + "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -84583,7 +84583,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1477, - "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \\n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \\n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \\n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \\n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \\n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \\n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", + "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -84601,7 +84601,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1477, - "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \\n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \\n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \\n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \\n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \\n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \\n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", + "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -84619,7 +84619,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1477, - "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \\n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \\n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \\n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \\n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \\n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \\n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", + "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -84637,7 +84637,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1477, - "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \\n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \\n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \\n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \\n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \\n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \\n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", + "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -84648,14 +84648,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.4 Risk and security assessment", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Risks during demobilization operations may include: \\n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement.", + "Sentence": "Risks during demobilization operations may include: \n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement.", "newParagraph": "comprehensive risk security assessment conducted inform planning demobilization operation identify threat ddr programme personnel well participant beneficiary assessment identify tolerable risk risk accepted society given context based current value identify protective measure necessary achieve residual risk risk remaining protective measure taken risk related woman youth child dependant specificneeds group also considered developing safe working environment must acknowledged absolute safety many activity carried demobilization operation high risk associated however national authority international organization nongovernmental organization must try achieve highest possible level safety risk demobilization operation may include n attack demobilization site personnel personnel staff demobilization site may targeted armed group signed peace agreement n attack demobilized individual instance peace agreement may cause armed group fracture part group opting enter ddr others continue fighting instance favour continued armed conflict may retaliate individual demobilize case active armed group may approach demobilization site aim retrieving former member demobilized individual already returned home member active armed group may attempt track individual order punish forcibly rerecruit family member demobilized may also subject threat attack particularly reside area member family member former group still present n attack woman minority group historically sgbv woman minority group cantonment site high essential security risk assessment take consideration specific vulnerability woman identify minority group may also risk provide additional security measure ensure safety n attack individual transporting receiving reinsertion support security risk associated transportation cash commodity easily seized armed individual known demobilized individual receive cash andor commodity certain time andor place may make target robbery n unrest criminality armed group remain demobilization site particularly cantonment site long period time perhaps delay ddr programme site may become place unrest especially food water become scarce demobilization delay lead mutiny combatant person associated armed force group lose trust process especially true demobilizing individual begin feel state andor international community reneging previous promise circumstance demobilized individual may resort criminality nearby community mount protest demobilization personnel n recruitment armed force group may use prospect demobilization associated reinsertion benefit incentive recruit civilian", "ProcessedSent": "risk demobilization operation may include n attack demobilization site personnel personnel staff demobilization site may targeted armed group signed peace agreement", "SentID": 4702 }, { "ParagraphID": 1477, - "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \\n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \\n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \\n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \\n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \\n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \\n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", + "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -84666,14 +84666,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.4 Risk and security assessment", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting.", + "Sentence": "\n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting.", "newParagraph": "comprehensive risk security assessment conducted inform planning demobilization operation identify threat ddr programme personnel well participant beneficiary assessment identify tolerable risk risk accepted society given context based current value identify protective measure necessary achieve residual risk risk remaining protective measure taken risk related woman youth child dependant specificneeds group also considered developing safe working environment must acknowledged absolute safety many activity carried demobilization operation high risk associated however national authority international organization nongovernmental organization must try achieve highest possible level safety risk demobilization operation may include n attack demobilization site personnel personnel staff demobilization site may targeted armed group signed peace agreement n attack demobilized individual instance peace agreement may cause armed group fracture part group opting enter ddr others continue fighting instance favour continued armed conflict may retaliate individual demobilize case active armed group may approach demobilization site aim retrieving former member demobilized individual already returned home member active armed group may attempt track individual order punish forcibly rerecruit family member demobilized may also subject threat attack particularly reside area member family member former group still present n attack woman minority group historically sgbv woman minority group cantonment site high essential security risk assessment take consideration specific vulnerability woman identify minority group may also risk provide additional security measure ensure safety n attack individual transporting receiving reinsertion support security risk associated transportation cash commodity easily seized armed individual known demobilized individual receive cash andor commodity certain time andor place may make target robbery n unrest criminality armed group remain demobilization site particularly cantonment site long period time perhaps delay ddr programme site may become place unrest especially food water become scarce demobilization delay lead mutiny combatant person associated armed force group lose trust process especially true demobilizing individual begin feel state andor international community reneging previous promise circumstance demobilized individual may resort criminality nearby community mount protest demobilization personnel n recruitment armed force group may use prospect demobilization associated reinsertion benefit incentive recruit civilian", "ProcessedSent": "n attack demobilized individual instance peace agreement may cause armed group fracture part group opting enter ddr others continue fighting", "SentID": 4703 }, { "ParagraphID": 1477, - "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \\n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \\n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \\n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \\n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \\n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \\n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", + "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -84691,7 +84691,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1477, - "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \\n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \\n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \\n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \\n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \\n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \\n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", + "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -84709,7 +84709,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1477, - "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \\n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \\n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \\n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \\n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \\n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \\n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", + "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -84727,7 +84727,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1477, - "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \\n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \\n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \\n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \\n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \\n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \\n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", + "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -84745,7 +84745,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1477, - "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \\n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \\n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \\n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \\n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \\n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \\n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", + "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -84756,14 +84756,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.4 Risk and security assessment", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high.", + "Sentence": "\n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high.", "newParagraph": "comprehensive risk security assessment conducted inform planning demobilization operation identify threat ddr programme personnel well participant beneficiary assessment identify tolerable risk risk accepted society given context based current value identify protective measure necessary achieve residual risk risk remaining protective measure taken risk related woman youth child dependant specificneeds group also considered developing safe working environment must acknowledged absolute safety many activity carried demobilization operation high risk associated however national authority international organization nongovernmental organization must try achieve highest possible level safety risk demobilization operation may include n attack demobilization site personnel personnel staff demobilization site may targeted armed group signed peace agreement n attack demobilized individual instance peace agreement may cause armed group fracture part group opting enter ddr others continue fighting instance favour continued armed conflict may retaliate individual demobilize case active armed group may approach demobilization site aim retrieving former member demobilized individual already returned home member active armed group may attempt track individual order punish forcibly rerecruit family member demobilized may also subject threat attack particularly reside area member family member former group still present n attack woman minority group historically sgbv woman minority group cantonment site high essential security risk assessment take consideration specific vulnerability woman identify minority group may also risk provide additional security measure ensure safety n attack individual transporting receiving reinsertion support security risk associated transportation cash commodity easily seized armed individual known demobilized individual receive cash andor commodity certain time andor place may make target robbery n unrest criminality armed group remain demobilization site particularly cantonment site long period time perhaps delay ddr programme site may become place unrest especially food water become scarce demobilization delay lead mutiny combatant person associated armed force group lose trust process especially true demobilizing individual begin feel state andor international community reneging previous promise circumstance demobilized individual may resort criminality nearby community mount protest demobilization personnel n recruitment armed force group may use prospect demobilization associated reinsertion benefit incentive recruit civilian", "ProcessedSent": "n attack woman minority group historically sgbv woman minority group cantonment site high", "SentID": 4708 }, { "ParagraphID": 1477, - "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \\n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \\n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \\n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \\n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \\n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \\n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", + "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -84781,7 +84781,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1477, - "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \\n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \\n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \\n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \\n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \\n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \\n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", + "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -84792,14 +84792,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.4 Risk and security assessment", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals.", + "Sentence": "\n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals.", "newParagraph": "comprehensive risk security assessment conducted inform planning demobilization operation identify threat ddr programme personnel well participant beneficiary assessment identify tolerable risk risk accepted society given context based current value identify protective measure necessary achieve residual risk risk remaining protective measure taken risk related woman youth child dependant specificneeds group also considered developing safe working environment must acknowledged absolute safety many activity carried demobilization operation high risk associated however national authority international organization nongovernmental organization must try achieve highest possible level safety risk demobilization operation may include n attack demobilization site personnel personnel staff demobilization site may targeted armed group signed peace agreement n attack demobilized individual instance peace agreement may cause armed group fracture part group opting enter ddr others continue fighting instance favour continued armed conflict may retaliate individual demobilize case active armed group may approach demobilization site aim retrieving former member demobilized individual already returned home member active armed group may attempt track individual order punish forcibly rerecruit family member demobilized may also subject threat attack particularly reside area member family member former group still present n attack woman minority group historically sgbv woman minority group cantonment site high essential security risk assessment take consideration specific vulnerability woman identify minority group may also risk provide additional security measure ensure safety n attack individual transporting receiving reinsertion support security risk associated transportation cash commodity easily seized armed individual known demobilized individual receive cash andor commodity certain time andor place may make target robbery n unrest criminality armed group remain demobilization site particularly cantonment site long period time perhaps delay ddr programme site may become place unrest especially food water become scarce demobilization delay lead mutiny combatant person associated armed force group lose trust process especially true demobilizing individual begin feel state andor international community reneging previous promise circumstance demobilized individual may resort criminality nearby community mount protest demobilization personnel n recruitment armed force group may use prospect demobilization associated reinsertion benefit incentive recruit civilian", "ProcessedSent": "n attack individual transporting receiving reinsertion support security risk associated transportation cash commodity easily seized armed individual", "SentID": 4710 }, { "ParagraphID": 1477, - "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \\n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \\n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \\n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \\n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \\n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \\n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", + "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -84817,7 +84817,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1477, - "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \\n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \\n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \\n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \\n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \\n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \\n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", + "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -84828,14 +84828,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.4 Risk and security assessment", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce.", + "Sentence": "\n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce.", "newParagraph": "comprehensive risk security assessment conducted inform planning demobilization operation identify threat ddr programme personnel well participant beneficiary assessment identify tolerable risk risk accepted society given context based current value identify protective measure necessary achieve residual risk risk remaining protective measure taken risk related woman youth child dependant specificneeds group also considered developing safe working environment must acknowledged absolute safety many activity carried demobilization operation high risk associated however national authority international organization nongovernmental organization must try achieve highest possible level safety risk demobilization operation may include n attack demobilization site personnel personnel staff demobilization site may targeted armed group signed peace agreement n attack demobilized individual instance peace agreement may cause armed group fracture part group opting enter ddr others continue fighting instance favour continued armed conflict may retaliate individual demobilize case active armed group may approach demobilization site aim retrieving former member demobilized individual already returned home member active armed group may attempt track individual order punish forcibly rerecruit family member demobilized may also subject threat attack particularly reside area member family member former group still present n attack woman minority group historically sgbv woman minority group cantonment site high essential security risk assessment take consideration specific vulnerability woman identify minority group may also risk provide additional security measure ensure safety n attack individual transporting receiving reinsertion support security risk associated transportation cash commodity easily seized armed individual known demobilized individual receive cash andor commodity certain time andor place may make target robbery n unrest criminality armed group remain demobilization site particularly cantonment site long period time perhaps delay ddr programme site may become place unrest especially food water become scarce demobilization delay lead mutiny combatant person associated armed force group lose trust process especially true demobilizing individual begin feel state andor international community reneging previous promise circumstance demobilized individual may resort criminality nearby community mount protest demobilization personnel n recruitment armed force group may use prospect demobilization associated reinsertion benefit incentive recruit civilian", "ProcessedSent": "n unrest criminality armed group remain demobilization site particularly cantonment site long period time perhaps delay ddr programme site may become place unrest especially food water become scarce", "SentID": 4712 }, { "ParagraphID": 1477, - "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \\n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \\n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \\n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \\n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \\n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \\n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", + "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -84853,7 +84853,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1477, - "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \\n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \\n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \\n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \\n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \\n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \\n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", + "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -84871,7 +84871,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1477, - "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \\n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \\n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \\n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \\n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \\n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \\n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", + "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -84889,7 +84889,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1477, - "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \\n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \\n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \\n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \\n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \\n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \\n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", + "Paragraph": "A comprehensive risk and security assessment should be conducted to inform the planning of demobilization operations and identify threats to the DDR programme and its personnel, as well as to participants and beneficiaries. The assessment should identify the tolerable risk (the risk accepted by society in a given context based on current values), and then identify the protective measures necessary to achieve a residual risk (the risk remaining after protective measures have been taken). Risks related to women, youth, children, dependants and other specific-needs groups should also be considered. In developing this \u2018safe\u2019 working environment, it must be acknowledged that there can be no absolute safety and that many of the activities carried out during demobilization operations have a high risk associated with them. However, national authorities, international organizations and non-governmental organizations must try to achieve the highest possible levels of safety. Risks during demobilization operations may include: \n Attacks on demobilization site personnel: The personnel who staff demobilization sites may be targeted by armed groups that have not signed on to the peace agreement. \n Attacks on demobilized individuals: In some instances, peace agreements may cause armed groups to fracture, with some parts of the group opting to enter DDR while others continue fighting. In these instances, those who favour continued armed conflict may retaliate against individuals who demobilize. In some cases, active armed groups may approach demobilization sites with the aim of retrieving their former members. If demobilized individuals have already returned home, members of active armed groups may attempt to track these individuals down in order to punish or forcibly re-recruit them. The family members of the demobilized may also be subject to threats and attacks, particularly if they reside in areas where members of their family member\u2019s former group are still present. \n Attacks on women and minority groups: Historically, SGBV against women and minority groups in cantonment sites has been high. It is essential that security and risk assessments take into consideration the specific vulnerabilities of women, identify minority groups who may also be at risk and provide additional security measures to ensure their safety. \n Attacks on individuals transporting and receiving reinsertion support: Security risks are associated with the transportation of cash and commodities that can be easily seized by armed individuals. If it is known that demobilized individuals will receive cash and\/or commodities at a certain time and\/or place, it may make them targets for robbery. \n Unrest and criminality: If armed groups remain in demobilization sites (particularly cantonment sites) for long periods of time, perhaps because of delays in the DDR programme, these sites may become places of unrest, especially if food and water become scarce. Demobilization delays can lead to mutinies by combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups as they lose trust in the process. This is especially true if demobilizing individuals begin to feel that the State and\/or international community is reneging on previous promises. In these circumstances, demobilized individuals may resort to criminality in nearby communities or mount protests against demobilization personnel. \n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -84900,14 +84900,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.4 Risk and security assessment", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", + "Sentence": "\n Recruitment: Armed forces and groups may use the prospect of demobilization (and associated reinsertion benefits) as an incentive to recruit civilians.", "newParagraph": "comprehensive risk security assessment conducted inform planning demobilization operation identify threat ddr programme personnel well participant beneficiary assessment identify tolerable risk risk accepted society given context based current value identify protective measure necessary achieve residual risk risk remaining protective measure taken risk related woman youth child dependant specificneeds group also considered developing safe working environment must acknowledged absolute safety many activity carried demobilization operation high risk associated however national authority international organization nongovernmental organization must try achieve highest possible level safety risk demobilization operation may include n attack demobilization site personnel personnel staff demobilization site may targeted armed group signed peace agreement n attack demobilized individual instance peace agreement may cause armed group fracture part group opting enter ddr others continue fighting instance favour continued armed conflict may retaliate individual demobilize case active armed group may approach demobilization site aim retrieving former member demobilized individual already returned home member active armed group may attempt track individual order punish forcibly rerecruit family member demobilized may also subject threat attack particularly reside area member family member former group still present n attack woman minority group historically sgbv woman minority group cantonment site high essential security risk assessment take consideration specific vulnerability woman identify minority group may also risk provide additional security measure ensure safety n attack individual transporting receiving reinsertion support security risk associated transportation cash commodity easily seized armed individual known demobilized individual receive cash andor commodity certain time andor place may make target robbery n unrest criminality armed group remain demobilization site particularly cantonment site long period time perhaps delay ddr programme site may become place unrest especially food water become scarce demobilization delay lead mutiny combatant person associated armed force group lose trust process especially true demobilizing individual begin feel state andor international community reneging previous promise circumstance demobilized individual may resort criminality nearby community mount protest demobilization personnel n recruitment armed force group may use prospect demobilization associated reinsertion benefit incentive recruit civilian", "ProcessedSent": "n recruitment armed force group may use prospect demobilization associated reinsertion benefit incentive recruit civilian", "SentID": 4716 }, { "ParagraphID": 1478, - "Paragraph": "Action should be taken to ensure that demobilization sites (whether temporary, semi-permanent or otherwise) respond to the different needs of men and women. Gender-sensitive demobilization sites should: \\n Include separate accommodation and sanitation facilities (with locks) for men and women. In some circumstances these separate facilities may be located within the same demobilization site, or separate demobilization sites for men and women may be set up; \\n Feature sanitary facilities designed to ensure women\u2019s privacy and support their hygiene needs (e.g., sanitary napkins), as well as take into consideration cultural norms; \\n Include provisions for childcare; \\n Be safe for women and recognize and deal with the threat of sexual violence within the demobilization site, including ensuring locks in facilities, good lighting, information provided on specific contact within the camp to address women\u2019s security incidents and issues, and, where possible, the presence of female security guards and police (for internal site security). If female security guards are not available, male security guards shall be trained on sexual exploitation and harassment, sexual violence prevention, and gender sensitivity prior to deployment, and there shall exist a clear and gender-responsive system at the demobilization site for handling any complaints by women against security guards, as well as policies that call for the immediate removal of any officer about whom security concerns are raised; \\n Provide for the specific nutritional needs of nursing and pregnant women; \\n Ensure that health care and counselling is available to meet women\u2019s specific needs, including those women who have suffered SGBV; and \\n Take protective measures to ensure women\u2019s safety during transportation to and from the demobilization sites.", + "Paragraph": "Action should be taken to ensure that demobilization sites (whether temporary, semi-permanent or otherwise) respond to the different needs of men and women. Gender-sensitive demobilization sites should: \n Include separate accommodation and sanitation facilities (with locks) for men and women. In some circumstances these separate facilities may be located within the same demobilization site, or separate demobilization sites for men and women may be set up; \n Feature sanitary facilities designed to ensure women\u2019s privacy and support their hygiene needs (e.g., sanitary napkins), as well as take into consideration cultural norms; \n Include provisions for childcare; \n Be safe for women and recognize and deal with the threat of sexual violence within the demobilization site, including ensuring locks in facilities, good lighting, information provided on specific contact within the camp to address women\u2019s security incidents and issues, and, where possible, the presence of female security guards and police (for internal site security). If female security guards are not available, male security guards shall be trained on sexual exploitation and harassment, sexual violence prevention, and gender sensitivity prior to deployment, and there shall exist a clear and gender-responsive system at the demobilization site for handling any complaints by women against security guards, as well as policies that call for the immediate removal of any officer about whom security concerns are raised; \n Provide for the specific nutritional needs of nursing and pregnant women; \n Ensure that health care and counselling is available to meet women\u2019s specific needs, including those women who have suffered SGBV; and \n Take protective measures to ensure women\u2019s safety during transportation to and from the demobilization sites.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -84925,7 +84925,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1478, - "Paragraph": "Action should be taken to ensure that demobilization sites (whether temporary, semi-permanent or otherwise) respond to the different needs of men and women. Gender-sensitive demobilization sites should: \\n Include separate accommodation and sanitation facilities (with locks) for men and women. In some circumstances these separate facilities may be located within the same demobilization site, or separate demobilization sites for men and women may be set up; \\n Feature sanitary facilities designed to ensure women\u2019s privacy and support their hygiene needs (e.g., sanitary napkins), as well as take into consideration cultural norms; \\n Include provisions for childcare; \\n Be safe for women and recognize and deal with the threat of sexual violence within the demobilization site, including ensuring locks in facilities, good lighting, information provided on specific contact within the camp to address women\u2019s security incidents and issues, and, where possible, the presence of female security guards and police (for internal site security). If female security guards are not available, male security guards shall be trained on sexual exploitation and harassment, sexual violence prevention, and gender sensitivity prior to deployment, and there shall exist a clear and gender-responsive system at the demobilization site for handling any complaints by women against security guards, as well as policies that call for the immediate removal of any officer about whom security concerns are raised; \\n Provide for the specific nutritional needs of nursing and pregnant women; \\n Ensure that health care and counselling is available to meet women\u2019s specific needs, including those women who have suffered SGBV; and \\n Take protective measures to ensure women\u2019s safety during transportation to and from the demobilization sites.", + "Paragraph": "Action should be taken to ensure that demobilization sites (whether temporary, semi-permanent or otherwise) respond to the different needs of men and women. Gender-sensitive demobilization sites should: \n Include separate accommodation and sanitation facilities (with locks) for men and women. In some circumstances these separate facilities may be located within the same demobilization site, or separate demobilization sites for men and women may be set up; \n Feature sanitary facilities designed to ensure women\u2019s privacy and support their hygiene needs (e.g., sanitary napkins), as well as take into consideration cultural norms; \n Include provisions for childcare; \n Be safe for women and recognize and deal with the threat of sexual violence within the demobilization site, including ensuring locks in facilities, good lighting, information provided on specific contact within the camp to address women\u2019s security incidents and issues, and, where possible, the presence of female security guards and police (for internal site security). If female security guards are not available, male security guards shall be trained on sexual exploitation and harassment, sexual violence prevention, and gender sensitivity prior to deployment, and there shall exist a clear and gender-responsive system at the demobilization site for handling any complaints by women against security guards, as well as policies that call for the immediate removal of any officer about whom security concerns are raised; \n Provide for the specific nutritional needs of nursing and pregnant women; \n Ensure that health care and counselling is available to meet women\u2019s specific needs, including those women who have suffered SGBV; and \n Take protective measures to ensure women\u2019s safety during transportation to and from the demobilization sites.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -84936,14 +84936,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.5 Gender-sensitive demobilization operations", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Gender-sensitive demobilization sites should: \\n Include separate accommodation and sanitation facilities (with locks) for men and women.", + "Sentence": "Gender-sensitive demobilization sites should: \n Include separate accommodation and sanitation facilities (with locks) for men and women.", "newParagraph": "action taken ensure demobilization site whether temporary semipermanent otherwise respond different need men woman gendersensitive demobilization site n include separate accommodation sanitation facility lock men woman circumstance separate facility may located within demobilization site separate demobilization site men woman may set n feature sanitary facility designed ensure woman privacy support hygiene need eg sanitary napkin well take consideration cultural norm n include provision childcare n safe woman recognize deal threat sexual violence within demobilization site including ensuring lock facility good lighting information provided specific contact within camp address woman security incident issue possible presence female security guard police internal site security female security guard available male security guard shall trained sexual exploitation harassment sexual violence prevention gender sensitivity prior deployment shall exist clear genderresponsive system demobilization site handling complaint woman security guard well policy call immediate removal officer security concern raised n provide specific nutritional need nursing pregnant woman n ensure health care counselling available meet woman specific need including woman suffered sgbv n take protective measure ensure woman safety transportation demobilization site", "ProcessedSent": "gendersensitive demobilization site n include separate accommodation sanitation facility lock men woman", "SentID": 4718 }, { "ParagraphID": 1478, - "Paragraph": "Action should be taken to ensure that demobilization sites (whether temporary, semi-permanent or otherwise) respond to the different needs of men and women. Gender-sensitive demobilization sites should: \\n Include separate accommodation and sanitation facilities (with locks) for men and women. In some circumstances these separate facilities may be located within the same demobilization site, or separate demobilization sites for men and women may be set up; \\n Feature sanitary facilities designed to ensure women\u2019s privacy and support their hygiene needs (e.g., sanitary napkins), as well as take into consideration cultural norms; \\n Include provisions for childcare; \\n Be safe for women and recognize and deal with the threat of sexual violence within the demobilization site, including ensuring locks in facilities, good lighting, information provided on specific contact within the camp to address women\u2019s security incidents and issues, and, where possible, the presence of female security guards and police (for internal site security). If female security guards are not available, male security guards shall be trained on sexual exploitation and harassment, sexual violence prevention, and gender sensitivity prior to deployment, and there shall exist a clear and gender-responsive system at the demobilization site for handling any complaints by women against security guards, as well as policies that call for the immediate removal of any officer about whom security concerns are raised; \\n Provide for the specific nutritional needs of nursing and pregnant women; \\n Ensure that health care and counselling is available to meet women\u2019s specific needs, including those women who have suffered SGBV; and \\n Take protective measures to ensure women\u2019s safety during transportation to and from the demobilization sites.", + "Paragraph": "Action should be taken to ensure that demobilization sites (whether temporary, semi-permanent or otherwise) respond to the different needs of men and women. Gender-sensitive demobilization sites should: \n Include separate accommodation and sanitation facilities (with locks) for men and women. In some circumstances these separate facilities may be located within the same demobilization site, or separate demobilization sites for men and women may be set up; \n Feature sanitary facilities designed to ensure women\u2019s privacy and support their hygiene needs (e.g., sanitary napkins), as well as take into consideration cultural norms; \n Include provisions for childcare; \n Be safe for women and recognize and deal with the threat of sexual violence within the demobilization site, including ensuring locks in facilities, good lighting, information provided on specific contact within the camp to address women\u2019s security incidents and issues, and, where possible, the presence of female security guards and police (for internal site security). If female security guards are not available, male security guards shall be trained on sexual exploitation and harassment, sexual violence prevention, and gender sensitivity prior to deployment, and there shall exist a clear and gender-responsive system at the demobilization site for handling any complaints by women against security guards, as well as policies that call for the immediate removal of any officer about whom security concerns are raised; \n Provide for the specific nutritional needs of nursing and pregnant women; \n Ensure that health care and counselling is available to meet women\u2019s specific needs, including those women who have suffered SGBV; and \n Take protective measures to ensure women\u2019s safety during transportation to and from the demobilization sites.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -84954,14 +84954,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.5 Gender-sensitive demobilization operations", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "In some circumstances these separate facilities may be located within the same demobilization site, or separate demobilization sites for men and women may be set up; \\n Feature sanitary facilities designed to ensure women\u2019s privacy and support their hygiene needs (e.g., sanitary napkins), as well as take into consideration cultural norms; \\n Include provisions for childcare; \\n Be safe for women and recognize and deal with the threat of sexual violence within the demobilization site, including ensuring locks in facilities, good lighting, information provided on specific contact within the camp to address women\u2019s security incidents and issues, and, where possible, the presence of female security guards and police (for internal site security).", + "Sentence": "In some circumstances these separate facilities may be located within the same demobilization site, or separate demobilization sites for men and women may be set up; \n Feature sanitary facilities designed to ensure women\u2019s privacy and support their hygiene needs (e.g., sanitary napkins), as well as take into consideration cultural norms; \n Include provisions for childcare; \n Be safe for women and recognize and deal with the threat of sexual violence within the demobilization site, including ensuring locks in facilities, good lighting, information provided on specific contact within the camp to address women\u2019s security incidents and issues, and, where possible, the presence of female security guards and police (for internal site security).", "newParagraph": "action taken ensure demobilization site whether temporary semipermanent otherwise respond different need men woman gendersensitive demobilization site n include separate accommodation sanitation facility lock men woman circumstance separate facility may located within demobilization site separate demobilization site men woman may set n feature sanitary facility designed ensure woman privacy support hygiene need eg sanitary napkin well take consideration cultural norm n include provision childcare n safe woman recognize deal threat sexual violence within demobilization site including ensuring lock facility good lighting information provided specific contact within camp address woman security incident issue possible presence female security guard police internal site security female security guard available male security guard shall trained sexual exploitation harassment sexual violence prevention gender sensitivity prior deployment shall exist clear genderresponsive system demobilization site handling complaint woman security guard well policy call immediate removal officer security concern raised n provide specific nutritional need nursing pregnant woman n ensure health care counselling available meet woman specific need including woman suffered sgbv n take protective measure ensure woman safety transportation demobilization site", "ProcessedSent": "circumstance separate facility may located within demobilization site separate demobilization site men woman may set n feature sanitary facility designed ensure woman privacy support hygiene need eg sanitary napkin well take consideration cultural norm n include provision childcare n safe woman recognize deal threat sexual violence within demobilization site including ensuring lock facility good lighting information provided specific contact within camp address woman security incident issue possible presence female security guard police internal site security", "SentID": 4719 }, { "ParagraphID": 1478, - "Paragraph": "Action should be taken to ensure that demobilization sites (whether temporary, semi-permanent or otherwise) respond to the different needs of men and women. Gender-sensitive demobilization sites should: \\n Include separate accommodation and sanitation facilities (with locks) for men and women. In some circumstances these separate facilities may be located within the same demobilization site, or separate demobilization sites for men and women may be set up; \\n Feature sanitary facilities designed to ensure women\u2019s privacy and support their hygiene needs (e.g., sanitary napkins), as well as take into consideration cultural norms; \\n Include provisions for childcare; \\n Be safe for women and recognize and deal with the threat of sexual violence within the demobilization site, including ensuring locks in facilities, good lighting, information provided on specific contact within the camp to address women\u2019s security incidents and issues, and, where possible, the presence of female security guards and police (for internal site security). If female security guards are not available, male security guards shall be trained on sexual exploitation and harassment, sexual violence prevention, and gender sensitivity prior to deployment, and there shall exist a clear and gender-responsive system at the demobilization site for handling any complaints by women against security guards, as well as policies that call for the immediate removal of any officer about whom security concerns are raised; \\n Provide for the specific nutritional needs of nursing and pregnant women; \\n Ensure that health care and counselling is available to meet women\u2019s specific needs, including those women who have suffered SGBV; and \\n Take protective measures to ensure women\u2019s safety during transportation to and from the demobilization sites.", + "Paragraph": "Action should be taken to ensure that demobilization sites (whether temporary, semi-permanent or otherwise) respond to the different needs of men and women. Gender-sensitive demobilization sites should: \n Include separate accommodation and sanitation facilities (with locks) for men and women. In some circumstances these separate facilities may be located within the same demobilization site, or separate demobilization sites for men and women may be set up; \n Feature sanitary facilities designed to ensure women\u2019s privacy and support their hygiene needs (e.g., sanitary napkins), as well as take into consideration cultural norms; \n Include provisions for childcare; \n Be safe for women and recognize and deal with the threat of sexual violence within the demobilization site, including ensuring locks in facilities, good lighting, information provided on specific contact within the camp to address women\u2019s security incidents and issues, and, where possible, the presence of female security guards and police (for internal site security). If female security guards are not available, male security guards shall be trained on sexual exploitation and harassment, sexual violence prevention, and gender sensitivity prior to deployment, and there shall exist a clear and gender-responsive system at the demobilization site for handling any complaints by women against security guards, as well as policies that call for the immediate removal of any officer about whom security concerns are raised; \n Provide for the specific nutritional needs of nursing and pregnant women; \n Ensure that health care and counselling is available to meet women\u2019s specific needs, including those women who have suffered SGBV; and \n Take protective measures to ensure women\u2019s safety during transportation to and from the demobilization sites.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -84972,7 +84972,7 @@ "Heading2": "5.5 Gender-sensitive demobilization operations", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "If female security guards are not available, male security guards shall be trained on sexual exploitation and harassment, sexual violence prevention, and gender sensitivity prior to deployment, and there shall exist a clear and gender-responsive system at the demobilization site for handling any complaints by women against security guards, as well as policies that call for the immediate removal of any officer about whom security concerns are raised; \\n Provide for the specific nutritional needs of nursing and pregnant women; \\n Ensure that health care and counselling is available to meet women\u2019s specific needs, including those women who have suffered SGBV; and \\n Take protective measures to ensure women\u2019s safety during transportation to and from the demobilization sites.", + "Sentence": "If female security guards are not available, male security guards shall be trained on sexual exploitation and harassment, sexual violence prevention, and gender sensitivity prior to deployment, and there shall exist a clear and gender-responsive system at the demobilization site for handling any complaints by women against security guards, as well as policies that call for the immediate removal of any officer about whom security concerns are raised; \n Provide for the specific nutritional needs of nursing and pregnant women; \n Ensure that health care and counselling is available to meet women\u2019s specific needs, including those women who have suffered SGBV; and \n Take protective measures to ensure women\u2019s safety during transportation to and from the demobilization sites.", "newParagraph": "action taken ensure demobilization site whether temporary semipermanent otherwise respond different need men woman gendersensitive demobilization site n include separate accommodation sanitation facility lock men woman circumstance separate facility may located within demobilization site separate demobilization site men woman may set n feature sanitary facility designed ensure woman privacy support hygiene need eg sanitary napkin well take consideration cultural norm n include provision childcare n safe woman recognize deal threat sexual violence within demobilization site including ensuring lock facility good lighting information provided specific contact within camp address woman security incident issue possible presence female security guard police internal site security female security guard available male security guard shall trained sexual exploitation harassment sexual violence prevention gender sensitivity prior deployment shall exist clear genderresponsive system demobilization site handling complaint woman security guard well policy call immediate removal officer security concern raised n provide specific nutritional need nursing pregnant woman n ensure health care counselling available meet woman specific need including woman suffered sgbv n take protective measure ensure woman safety transportation demobilization site", "ProcessedSent": "female security guard available male security guard shall trained sexual exploitation harassment sexual violence prevention gender sensitivity prior deployment shall exist clear genderresponsive system demobilization site handling complaint woman security guard well policy call immediate removal officer security concern raised n provide specific nutritional need nursing pregnant woman n ensure health care counselling available meet woman specific need including woman suffered sgbv n take protective measure ensure woman safety transportation demobilization site", "SentID": 4720 @@ -85303,7 +85303,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1483, - "Paragraph": "A single demobilization SOP or a set of SOPs each covering specific procedures related to demobilization activities (see section 6) should be informed by integrated assessments (see IDDRS 3.11 on Integrated Assessments) and the national DDR policy document, and comply with international guidelines and standards as well as national laws and the international obligations of the country where DDR is being implemented. At a minimum, SOPs should cover the following procedures: \\n Security of demobilization sites; \\n Reception of combatants, persons associated with armed forces and groups, and dependants; \\n Transportation to and from demobilization sites (i.e., from reception or pick-up points); \\n Transportation from demobilization sites either to communities or to take up positions in the reformed security sector; \\n Orientation at the demobilization site (this may include the rules and regulations at the site); \\n Registration\/identification; \\n Screening for eligibility; \\n Demobilization and integration into the security sector (if applicable); \\n Health screenings, including psychosocial assessments, HIV\/AIDS, STIs, reproductive health services, sexual violence recovery services (e.g., rape kits), etc.; \\n Gender-aware services and procedures; \\n Reinsertion (e.g., procedures for cash-based transfers, commodity vouchers, in-kind support, public works programmes, vocational training and\/or income-generating opportunities); \\n Handling of foreign combatants, associated persons and dependants (if applicable); and \\n Interaction with national authorities and\/or other mission components.", + "Paragraph": "A single demobilization SOP or a set of SOPs each covering specific procedures related to demobilization activities (see section 6) should be informed by integrated assessments (see IDDRS 3.11 on Integrated Assessments) and the national DDR policy document, and comply with international guidelines and standards as well as national laws and the international obligations of the country where DDR is being implemented. At a minimum, SOPs should cover the following procedures: \n Security of demobilization sites; \n Reception of combatants, persons associated with armed forces and groups, and dependants; \n Transportation to and from demobilization sites (i.e., from reception or pick-up points); \n Transportation from demobilization sites either to communities or to take up positions in the reformed security sector; \n Orientation at the demobilization site (this may include the rules and regulations at the site); \n Registration\/identification; \n Screening for eligibility; \n Demobilization and integration into the security sector (if applicable); \n Health screenings, including psychosocial assessments, HIV\/AIDS, STIs, reproductive health services, sexual violence recovery services (e.g., rape kits), etc.; \n Gender-aware services and procedures; \n Reinsertion (e.g., procedures for cash-based transfers, commodity vouchers, in-kind support, public works programmes, vocational training and\/or income-generating opportunities); \n Handling of foreign combatants, associated persons and dependants (if applicable); and \n Interaction with national authorities and\/or other mission components.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -85321,7 +85321,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1483, - "Paragraph": "A single demobilization SOP or a set of SOPs each covering specific procedures related to demobilization activities (see section 6) should be informed by integrated assessments (see IDDRS 3.11 on Integrated Assessments) and the national DDR policy document, and comply with international guidelines and standards as well as national laws and the international obligations of the country where DDR is being implemented. At a minimum, SOPs should cover the following procedures: \\n Security of demobilization sites; \\n Reception of combatants, persons associated with armed forces and groups, and dependants; \\n Transportation to and from demobilization sites (i.e., from reception or pick-up points); \\n Transportation from demobilization sites either to communities or to take up positions in the reformed security sector; \\n Orientation at the demobilization site (this may include the rules and regulations at the site); \\n Registration\/identification; \\n Screening for eligibility; \\n Demobilization and integration into the security sector (if applicable); \\n Health screenings, including psychosocial assessments, HIV\/AIDS, STIs, reproductive health services, sexual violence recovery services (e.g., rape kits), etc.; \\n Gender-aware services and procedures; \\n Reinsertion (e.g., procedures for cash-based transfers, commodity vouchers, in-kind support, public works programmes, vocational training and\/or income-generating opportunities); \\n Handling of foreign combatants, associated persons and dependants (if applicable); and \\n Interaction with national authorities and\/or other mission components.", + "Paragraph": "A single demobilization SOP or a set of SOPs each covering specific procedures related to demobilization activities (see section 6) should be informed by integrated assessments (see IDDRS 3.11 on Integrated Assessments) and the national DDR policy document, and comply with international guidelines and standards as well as national laws and the international obligations of the country where DDR is being implemented. At a minimum, SOPs should cover the following procedures: \n Security of demobilization sites; \n Reception of combatants, persons associated with armed forces and groups, and dependants; \n Transportation to and from demobilization sites (i.e., from reception or pick-up points); \n Transportation from demobilization sites either to communities or to take up positions in the reformed security sector; \n Orientation at the demobilization site (this may include the rules and regulations at the site); \n Registration\/identification; \n Screening for eligibility; \n Demobilization and integration into the security sector (if applicable); \n Health screenings, including psychosocial assessments, HIV\/AIDS, STIs, reproductive health services, sexual violence recovery services (e.g., rape kits), etc.; \n Gender-aware services and procedures; \n Reinsertion (e.g., procedures for cash-based transfers, commodity vouchers, in-kind support, public works programmes, vocational training and\/or income-generating opportunities); \n Handling of foreign combatants, associated persons and dependants (if applicable); and \n Interaction with national authorities and\/or other mission components.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -85332,14 +85332,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.6 Standard operating procedures", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "At a minimum, SOPs should cover the following procedures: \\n Security of demobilization sites; \\n Reception of combatants, persons associated with armed forces and groups, and dependants; \\n Transportation to and from demobilization sites (i.e., from reception or pick-up points); \\n Transportation from demobilization sites either to communities or to take up positions in the reformed security sector; \\n Orientation at the demobilization site (this may include the rules and regulations at the site); \\n Registration\/identification; \\n Screening for eligibility; \\n Demobilization and integration into the security sector (if applicable); \\n Health screenings, including psychosocial assessments, HIV\/AIDS, STIs, reproductive health services, sexual violence recovery services (e.g., rape kits), etc.", + "Sentence": "At a minimum, SOPs should cover the following procedures: \n Security of demobilization sites; \n Reception of combatants, persons associated with armed forces and groups, and dependants; \n Transportation to and from demobilization sites (i.e., from reception or pick-up points); \n Transportation from demobilization sites either to communities or to take up positions in the reformed security sector; \n Orientation at the demobilization site (this may include the rules and regulations at the site); \n Registration\/identification; \n Screening for eligibility; \n Demobilization and integration into the security sector (if applicable); \n Health screenings, including psychosocial assessments, HIV\/AIDS, STIs, reproductive health services, sexual violence recovery services (e.g., rape kits), etc.", "newParagraph": "single demobilization sop set sop covering specific procedure related demobilization activity see section 6 informed integrated assessment see iddrs 311 integrated assessment national ddr policy document comply international guideline standard well national law international obligation country ddr implemented minimum sop cover following procedure n security demobilization site n reception combatant person associated armed force group dependant n transportation demobilization site ie reception pickup point n transportation demobilization site either community take position reformed security sector n orientation demobilization site may include rule regulation site n registrationidentification n screening eligibility n demobilization integration security sector applicable n health screening including psychosocial assessment hivaids stis reproductive health service sexual violence recovery service eg rape kit etc n genderaware service procedure n reinsertion eg procedure cashbased transfer commodity voucher inkind support public work programme vocational training andor incomegenerating opportunity n handling foreign combatant associated person dependant applicable n interaction national authority andor mission component", "ProcessedSent": "minimum sop cover following procedure n security demobilization site n reception combatant person associated armed force group dependant n transportation demobilization site ie reception pickup point n transportation demobilization site either community take position reformed security sector n orientation demobilization site may include rule regulation site n registrationidentification n screening eligibility n demobilization integration security sector applicable n health screening including psychosocial assessment hivaids stis reproductive health service sexual violence recovery service eg rape kit etc", "SentID": 4740 }, { "ParagraphID": 1483, - "Paragraph": "A single demobilization SOP or a set of SOPs each covering specific procedures related to demobilization activities (see section 6) should be informed by integrated assessments (see IDDRS 3.11 on Integrated Assessments) and the national DDR policy document, and comply with international guidelines and standards as well as national laws and the international obligations of the country where DDR is being implemented. At a minimum, SOPs should cover the following procedures: \\n Security of demobilization sites; \\n Reception of combatants, persons associated with armed forces and groups, and dependants; \\n Transportation to and from demobilization sites (i.e., from reception or pick-up points); \\n Transportation from demobilization sites either to communities or to take up positions in the reformed security sector; \\n Orientation at the demobilization site (this may include the rules and regulations at the site); \\n Registration\/identification; \\n Screening for eligibility; \\n Demobilization and integration into the security sector (if applicable); \\n Health screenings, including psychosocial assessments, HIV\/AIDS, STIs, reproductive health services, sexual violence recovery services (e.g., rape kits), etc.; \\n Gender-aware services and procedures; \\n Reinsertion (e.g., procedures for cash-based transfers, commodity vouchers, in-kind support, public works programmes, vocational training and\/or income-generating opportunities); \\n Handling of foreign combatants, associated persons and dependants (if applicable); and \\n Interaction with national authorities and\/or other mission components.", + "Paragraph": "A single demobilization SOP or a set of SOPs each covering specific procedures related to demobilization activities (see section 6) should be informed by integrated assessments (see IDDRS 3.11 on Integrated Assessments) and the national DDR policy document, and comply with international guidelines and standards as well as national laws and the international obligations of the country where DDR is being implemented. At a minimum, SOPs should cover the following procedures: \n Security of demobilization sites; \n Reception of combatants, persons associated with armed forces and groups, and dependants; \n Transportation to and from demobilization sites (i.e., from reception or pick-up points); \n Transportation from demobilization sites either to communities or to take up positions in the reformed security sector; \n Orientation at the demobilization site (this may include the rules and regulations at the site); \n Registration\/identification; \n Screening for eligibility; \n Demobilization and integration into the security sector (if applicable); \n Health screenings, including psychosocial assessments, HIV\/AIDS, STIs, reproductive health services, sexual violence recovery services (e.g., rape kits), etc.; \n Gender-aware services and procedures; \n Reinsertion (e.g., procedures for cash-based transfers, commodity vouchers, in-kind support, public works programmes, vocational training and\/or income-generating opportunities); \n Handling of foreign combatants, associated persons and dependants (if applicable); and \n Interaction with national authorities and\/or other mission components.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -85350,14 +85350,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.6 Standard operating procedures", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "; \\n Gender-aware services and procedures; \\n Reinsertion (e.g., procedures for cash-based transfers, commodity vouchers, in-kind support, public works programmes, vocational training and\/or income-generating opportunities); \\n Handling of foreign combatants, associated persons and dependants (if applicable); and \\n Interaction with national authorities and\/or other mission components.", + "Sentence": "; \n Gender-aware services and procedures; \n Reinsertion (e.g., procedures for cash-based transfers, commodity vouchers, in-kind support, public works programmes, vocational training and\/or income-generating opportunities); \n Handling of foreign combatants, associated persons and dependants (if applicable); and \n Interaction with national authorities and\/or other mission components.", "newParagraph": "single demobilization sop set sop covering specific procedure related demobilization activity see section 6 informed integrated assessment see iddrs 311 integrated assessment national ddr policy document comply international guideline standard well national law international obligation country ddr implemented minimum sop cover following procedure n security demobilization site n reception combatant person associated armed force group dependant n transportation demobilization site ie reception pickup point n transportation demobilization site either community take position reformed security sector n orientation demobilization site may include rule regulation site n registrationidentification n screening eligibility n demobilization integration security sector applicable n health screening including psychosocial assessment hivaids stis reproductive health service sexual violence recovery service eg rape kit etc n genderaware service procedure n reinsertion eg procedure cashbased transfer commodity voucher inkind support public work programme vocational training andor incomegenerating opportunity n handling foreign combatant associated person dependant applicable n interaction national authority andor mission component", "ProcessedSent": " n genderaware service procedure n reinsertion eg procedure cashbased transfer commodity voucher inkind support public work programme vocational training andor incomegenerating opportunity n handling foreign combatant associated person dependant applicable n interaction national authority andor mission component", "SentID": 4741 }, { "ParagraphID": 1484, - "Paragraph": "The demobilization team is responsible for implementing all operational procedures for demobilization and should be trained in the use of the abovementioned SOPs. The demobilization team should include a gender-balanced composition of: \\n DDR practitioners; \\n Representatives from the national DDR commission (and potentially other national institutions); \\n Child protection officers; \\n Gender specialists; and \\n Youth specialists.", + "Paragraph": "The demobilization team is responsible for implementing all operational procedures for demobilization and should be trained in the use of the abovementioned SOPs. The demobilization team should include a gender-balanced composition of: \n DDR practitioners; \n Representatives from the national DDR commission (and potentially other national institutions); \n Child protection officers; \n Gender specialists; and \n Youth specialists.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -85375,7 +85375,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1484, - "Paragraph": "The demobilization team is responsible for implementing all operational procedures for demobilization and should be trained in the use of the abovementioned SOPs. The demobilization team should include a gender-balanced composition of: \\n DDR practitioners; \\n Representatives from the national DDR commission (and potentially other national institutions); \\n Child protection officers; \\n Gender specialists; and \\n Youth specialists.", + "Paragraph": "The demobilization team is responsible for implementing all operational procedures for demobilization and should be trained in the use of the abovementioned SOPs. The demobilization team should include a gender-balanced composition of: \n DDR practitioners; \n Representatives from the national DDR commission (and potentially other national institutions); \n Child protection officers; \n Gender specialists; and \n Youth specialists.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -85386,7 +85386,7 @@ "Heading2": "5.7 Demobilization team structure", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The demobilization team should include a gender-balanced composition of: \\n DDR practitioners; \\n Representatives from the national DDR commission (and potentially other national institutions); \\n Child protection officers; \\n Gender specialists; and \\n Youth specialists.", + "Sentence": "The demobilization team should include a gender-balanced composition of: \n DDR practitioners; \n Representatives from the national DDR commission (and potentially other national institutions); \n Child protection officers; \n Gender specialists; and \n Youth specialists.", "newParagraph": "demobilization team responsible implementing operational procedure demobilization trained use abovementioned sop demobilization team include genderbalanced composition n ddr practitioner n representative national ddr commission potentially national institution n child protection officer n gender specialist n youth specialist", "ProcessedSent": "demobilization team include genderbalanced composition n ddr practitioner n representative national ddr commission potentially national institution n child protection officer n gender specialist n youth specialist", "SentID": 4743 @@ -85429,7 +85429,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1486, - "Paragraph": "Potential DDR participants shall be screened to ascertain if they are eligible to participate in a DDR programme. The objectives of screening are to: \\n Establish the eligibility of the potential DDR participant and register those who meet the criteria; \\n Weed out individuals trying to cheat the system, for example, those attempting to demobilize more than once in the hope of receiving additional benefits, or civilians trying to access demobilization benefits; \\n Identify DDR participants with specific requirements (children, youth, child mobilized\u2013adult demobilized, women, persons with disabilities and persons with chronic illnesses); and \\n Depending on the context, identify foreign combatants that need to be repatriated to their home countries (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements).", + "Paragraph": "Potential DDR participants shall be screened to ascertain if they are eligible to participate in a DDR programme. The objectives of screening are to: \n Establish the eligibility of the potential DDR participant and register those who meet the criteria; \n Weed out individuals trying to cheat the system, for example, those attempting to demobilize more than once in the hope of receiving additional benefits, or civilians trying to access demobilization benefits; \n Identify DDR participants with specific requirements (children, youth, child mobilized\u2013adult demobilized, women, persons with disabilities and persons with chronic illnesses); and \n Depending on the context, identify foreign combatants that need to be repatriated to their home countries (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -85447,7 +85447,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1486, - "Paragraph": "Potential DDR participants shall be screened to ascertain if they are eligible to participate in a DDR programme. The objectives of screening are to: \\n Establish the eligibility of the potential DDR participant and register those who meet the criteria; \\n Weed out individuals trying to cheat the system, for example, those attempting to demobilize more than once in the hope of receiving additional benefits, or civilians trying to access demobilization benefits; \\n Identify DDR participants with specific requirements (children, youth, child mobilized\u2013adult demobilized, women, persons with disabilities and persons with chronic illnesses); and \\n Depending on the context, identify foreign combatants that need to be repatriated to their home countries (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements).", + "Paragraph": "Potential DDR participants shall be screened to ascertain if they are eligible to participate in a DDR programme. The objectives of screening are to: \n Establish the eligibility of the potential DDR participant and register those who meet the criteria; \n Weed out individuals trying to cheat the system, for example, those attempting to demobilize more than once in the hope of receiving additional benefits, or civilians trying to access demobilization benefits; \n Identify DDR participants with specific requirements (children, youth, child mobilized\u2013adult demobilized, women, persons with disabilities and persons with chronic illnesses); and \n Depending on the context, identify foreign combatants that need to be repatriated to their home countries (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -85458,7 +85458,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Screening, verification and registration", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The objectives of screening are to: \\n Establish the eligibility of the potential DDR participant and register those who meet the criteria; \\n Weed out individuals trying to cheat the system, for example, those attempting to demobilize more than once in the hope of receiving additional benefits, or civilians trying to access demobilization benefits; \\n Identify DDR participants with specific requirements (children, youth, child mobilized\u2013adult demobilized, women, persons with disabilities and persons with chronic illnesses); and \\n Depending on the context, identify foreign combatants that need to be repatriated to their home countries (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements).", + "Sentence": "The objectives of screening are to: \n Establish the eligibility of the potential DDR participant and register those who meet the criteria; \n Weed out individuals trying to cheat the system, for example, those attempting to demobilize more than once in the hope of receiving additional benefits, or civilians trying to access demobilization benefits; \n Identify DDR participants with specific requirements (children, youth, child mobilized\u2013adult demobilized, women, persons with disabilities and persons with chronic illnesses); and \n Depending on the context, identify foreign combatants that need to be repatriated to their home countries (see IDDRS 5.40 on Cross-Border Population Movements).", "newParagraph": "potential ddr participant shall screened ascertain eligible participate ddr programme objective screening n establish eligibility potential ddr participant register meet criterion n weed individual trying cheat system example attempting demobilize hope receiving additional benefit civilian trying access demobilization benefit n identify ddr participant specific requirement child youth child mobilized adult demobilized woman person disability person chronic illness n depending context identify foreign combatant need repatriated home country see iddrs 540 crossborder population movement", "ProcessedSent": "objective screening n establish eligibility potential ddr participant register meet criterion n weed individual trying cheat system example attempting demobilize hope receiving additional benefit civilian trying access demobilization benefit n identify ddr participant specific requirement child youth child mobilized adult demobilized woman person disability person chronic illness n depending context identify foreign combatant need repatriated home country see iddrs 540 crossborder population movement", "SentID": 4747 @@ -86149,7 +86149,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1491, - "Paragraph": "Combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups should be provided with clear and simple guidance when they arrive at demobilization sites, taking into consideration their level of literacy. This is to ensure that they are informed about the demobilization process, their rights during the process, and the rules and regulations they are expected to observe. If a large number of participants are being addressed, it is key to stick to simple concepts, mainly who, what and where. More complex explanations can be provided to smaller groups organized in follow-up to the initial briefing. This can help to prevent unrest and stress within the group. Contingent on the type of demobilization site, introductory briefings should cover, among other things, the following: \\n Site orientation; \\n Outline of activities and processes; \\n Routines and time schedules; \\n The rights and obligations of combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups throughout the demobilization process; \\n Rules and discipline, including areas that are off limits; \\n Policies concerning freedom of movement in and out of the demobilization site; \\n Policies on SGBV and the consequences of infringement of these policies; \\n Security at the demobilization site; \\n How to report misbehaviour, including specific mechanisms for women; \\n Mechanisms to raise complaints about conditions and treatment at the demobilization site; \\n Procedures for dependants; and \\n Fire precautions and physical safety.", + "Paragraph": "Combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups should be provided with clear and simple guidance when they arrive at demobilization sites, taking into consideration their level of literacy. This is to ensure that they are informed about the demobilization process, their rights during the process, and the rules and regulations they are expected to observe. If a large number of participants are being addressed, it is key to stick to simple concepts, mainly who, what and where. More complex explanations can be provided to smaller groups organized in follow-up to the initial briefing. This can help to prevent unrest and stress within the group. Contingent on the type of demobilization site, introductory briefings should cover, among other things, the following: \n Site orientation; \n Outline of activities and processes; \n Routines and time schedules; \n The rights and obligations of combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups throughout the demobilization process; \n Rules and discipline, including areas that are off limits; \n Policies concerning freedom of movement in and out of the demobilization site; \n Policies on SGBV and the consequences of infringement of these policies; \n Security at the demobilization site; \n How to report misbehaviour, including specific mechanisms for women; \n Mechanisms to raise complaints about conditions and treatment at the demobilization site; \n Procedures for dependants; and \n Fire precautions and physical safety.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -86167,7 +86167,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1491, - "Paragraph": "Combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups should be provided with clear and simple guidance when they arrive at demobilization sites, taking into consideration their level of literacy. This is to ensure that they are informed about the demobilization process, their rights during the process, and the rules and regulations they are expected to observe. If a large number of participants are being addressed, it is key to stick to simple concepts, mainly who, what and where. More complex explanations can be provided to smaller groups organized in follow-up to the initial briefing. This can help to prevent unrest and stress within the group. Contingent on the type of demobilization site, introductory briefings should cover, among other things, the following: \\n Site orientation; \\n Outline of activities and processes; \\n Routines and time schedules; \\n The rights and obligations of combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups throughout the demobilization process; \\n Rules and discipline, including areas that are off limits; \\n Policies concerning freedom of movement in and out of the demobilization site; \\n Policies on SGBV and the consequences of infringement of these policies; \\n Security at the demobilization site; \\n How to report misbehaviour, including specific mechanisms for women; \\n Mechanisms to raise complaints about conditions and treatment at the demobilization site; \\n Procedures for dependants; and \\n Fire precautions and physical safety.", + "Paragraph": "Combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups should be provided with clear and simple guidance when they arrive at demobilization sites, taking into consideration their level of literacy. This is to ensure that they are informed about the demobilization process, their rights during the process, and the rules and regulations they are expected to observe. If a large number of participants are being addressed, it is key to stick to simple concepts, mainly who, what and where. More complex explanations can be provided to smaller groups organized in follow-up to the initial briefing. This can help to prevent unrest and stress within the group. Contingent on the type of demobilization site, introductory briefings should cover, among other things, the following: \n Site orientation; \n Outline of activities and processes; \n Routines and time schedules; \n The rights and obligations of combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups throughout the demobilization process; \n Rules and discipline, including areas that are off limits; \n Policies concerning freedom of movement in and out of the demobilization site; \n Policies on SGBV and the consequences of infringement of these policies; \n Security at the demobilization site; \n How to report misbehaviour, including specific mechanisms for women; \n Mechanisms to raise complaints about conditions and treatment at the demobilization site; \n Procedures for dependants; and \n Fire precautions and physical safety.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -86185,7 +86185,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1491, - "Paragraph": "Combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups should be provided with clear and simple guidance when they arrive at demobilization sites, taking into consideration their level of literacy. This is to ensure that they are informed about the demobilization process, their rights during the process, and the rules and regulations they are expected to observe. If a large number of participants are being addressed, it is key to stick to simple concepts, mainly who, what and where. More complex explanations can be provided to smaller groups organized in follow-up to the initial briefing. This can help to prevent unrest and stress within the group. Contingent on the type of demobilization site, introductory briefings should cover, among other things, the following: \\n Site orientation; \\n Outline of activities and processes; \\n Routines and time schedules; \\n The rights and obligations of combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups throughout the demobilization process; \\n Rules and discipline, including areas that are off limits; \\n Policies concerning freedom of movement in and out of the demobilization site; \\n Policies on SGBV and the consequences of infringement of these policies; \\n Security at the demobilization site; \\n How to report misbehaviour, including specific mechanisms for women; \\n Mechanisms to raise complaints about conditions and treatment at the demobilization site; \\n Procedures for dependants; and \\n Fire precautions and physical safety.", + "Paragraph": "Combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups should be provided with clear and simple guidance when they arrive at demobilization sites, taking into consideration their level of literacy. This is to ensure that they are informed about the demobilization process, their rights during the process, and the rules and regulations they are expected to observe. If a large number of participants are being addressed, it is key to stick to simple concepts, mainly who, what and where. More complex explanations can be provided to smaller groups organized in follow-up to the initial briefing. This can help to prevent unrest and stress within the group. Contingent on the type of demobilization site, introductory briefings should cover, among other things, the following: \n Site orientation; \n Outline of activities and processes; \n Routines and time schedules; \n The rights and obligations of combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups throughout the demobilization process; \n Rules and discipline, including areas that are off limits; \n Policies concerning freedom of movement in and out of the demobilization site; \n Policies on SGBV and the consequences of infringement of these policies; \n Security at the demobilization site; \n How to report misbehaviour, including specific mechanisms for women; \n Mechanisms to raise complaints about conditions and treatment at the demobilization site; \n Procedures for dependants; and \n Fire precautions and physical safety.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -86203,7 +86203,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1491, - "Paragraph": "Combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups should be provided with clear and simple guidance when they arrive at demobilization sites, taking into consideration their level of literacy. This is to ensure that they are informed about the demobilization process, their rights during the process, and the rules and regulations they are expected to observe. If a large number of participants are being addressed, it is key to stick to simple concepts, mainly who, what and where. More complex explanations can be provided to smaller groups organized in follow-up to the initial briefing. This can help to prevent unrest and stress within the group. Contingent on the type of demobilization site, introductory briefings should cover, among other things, the following: \\n Site orientation; \\n Outline of activities and processes; \\n Routines and time schedules; \\n The rights and obligations of combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups throughout the demobilization process; \\n Rules and discipline, including areas that are off limits; \\n Policies concerning freedom of movement in and out of the demobilization site; \\n Policies on SGBV and the consequences of infringement of these policies; \\n Security at the demobilization site; \\n How to report misbehaviour, including specific mechanisms for women; \\n Mechanisms to raise complaints about conditions and treatment at the demobilization site; \\n Procedures for dependants; and \\n Fire precautions and physical safety.", + "Paragraph": "Combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups should be provided with clear and simple guidance when they arrive at demobilization sites, taking into consideration their level of literacy. This is to ensure that they are informed about the demobilization process, their rights during the process, and the rules and regulations they are expected to observe. If a large number of participants are being addressed, it is key to stick to simple concepts, mainly who, what and where. More complex explanations can be provided to smaller groups organized in follow-up to the initial briefing. This can help to prevent unrest and stress within the group. Contingent on the type of demobilization site, introductory briefings should cover, among other things, the following: \n Site orientation; \n Outline of activities and processes; \n Routines and time schedules; \n The rights and obligations of combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups throughout the demobilization process; \n Rules and discipline, including areas that are off limits; \n Policies concerning freedom of movement in and out of the demobilization site; \n Policies on SGBV and the consequences of infringement of these policies; \n Security at the demobilization site; \n How to report misbehaviour, including specific mechanisms for women; \n Mechanisms to raise complaints about conditions and treatment at the demobilization site; \n Procedures for dependants; and \n Fire precautions and physical safety.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -86221,7 +86221,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1491, - "Paragraph": "Combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups should be provided with clear and simple guidance when they arrive at demobilization sites, taking into consideration their level of literacy. This is to ensure that they are informed about the demobilization process, their rights during the process, and the rules and regulations they are expected to observe. If a large number of participants are being addressed, it is key to stick to simple concepts, mainly who, what and where. More complex explanations can be provided to smaller groups organized in follow-up to the initial briefing. This can help to prevent unrest and stress within the group. Contingent on the type of demobilization site, introductory briefings should cover, among other things, the following: \\n Site orientation; \\n Outline of activities and processes; \\n Routines and time schedules; \\n The rights and obligations of combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups throughout the demobilization process; \\n Rules and discipline, including areas that are off limits; \\n Policies concerning freedom of movement in and out of the demobilization site; \\n Policies on SGBV and the consequences of infringement of these policies; \\n Security at the demobilization site; \\n How to report misbehaviour, including specific mechanisms for women; \\n Mechanisms to raise complaints about conditions and treatment at the demobilization site; \\n Procedures for dependants; and \\n Fire precautions and physical safety.", + "Paragraph": "Combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups should be provided with clear and simple guidance when they arrive at demobilization sites, taking into consideration their level of literacy. This is to ensure that they are informed about the demobilization process, their rights during the process, and the rules and regulations they are expected to observe. If a large number of participants are being addressed, it is key to stick to simple concepts, mainly who, what and where. More complex explanations can be provided to smaller groups organized in follow-up to the initial briefing. This can help to prevent unrest and stress within the group. Contingent on the type of demobilization site, introductory briefings should cover, among other things, the following: \n Site orientation; \n Outline of activities and processes; \n Routines and time schedules; \n The rights and obligations of combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups throughout the demobilization process; \n Rules and discipline, including areas that are off limits; \n Policies concerning freedom of movement in and out of the demobilization site; \n Policies on SGBV and the consequences of infringement of these policies; \n Security at the demobilization site; \n How to report misbehaviour, including specific mechanisms for women; \n Mechanisms to raise complaints about conditions and treatment at the demobilization site; \n Procedures for dependants; and \n Fire precautions and physical safety.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -86239,7 +86239,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1491, - "Paragraph": "Combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups should be provided with clear and simple guidance when they arrive at demobilization sites, taking into consideration their level of literacy. This is to ensure that they are informed about the demobilization process, their rights during the process, and the rules and regulations they are expected to observe. If a large number of participants are being addressed, it is key to stick to simple concepts, mainly who, what and where. More complex explanations can be provided to smaller groups organized in follow-up to the initial briefing. This can help to prevent unrest and stress within the group. Contingent on the type of demobilization site, introductory briefings should cover, among other things, the following: \\n Site orientation; \\n Outline of activities and processes; \\n Routines and time schedules; \\n The rights and obligations of combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups throughout the demobilization process; \\n Rules and discipline, including areas that are off limits; \\n Policies concerning freedom of movement in and out of the demobilization site; \\n Policies on SGBV and the consequences of infringement of these policies; \\n Security at the demobilization site; \\n How to report misbehaviour, including specific mechanisms for women; \\n Mechanisms to raise complaints about conditions and treatment at the demobilization site; \\n Procedures for dependants; and \\n Fire precautions and physical safety.", + "Paragraph": "Combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups should be provided with clear and simple guidance when they arrive at demobilization sites, taking into consideration their level of literacy. This is to ensure that they are informed about the demobilization process, their rights during the process, and the rules and regulations they are expected to observe. If a large number of participants are being addressed, it is key to stick to simple concepts, mainly who, what and where. More complex explanations can be provided to smaller groups organized in follow-up to the initial briefing. This can help to prevent unrest and stress within the group. Contingent on the type of demobilization site, introductory briefings should cover, among other things, the following: \n Site orientation; \n Outline of activities and processes; \n Routines and time schedules; \n The rights and obligations of combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups throughout the demobilization process; \n Rules and discipline, including areas that are off limits; \n Policies concerning freedom of movement in and out of the demobilization site; \n Policies on SGBV and the consequences of infringement of these policies; \n Security at the demobilization site; \n How to report misbehaviour, including specific mechanisms for women; \n Mechanisms to raise complaints about conditions and treatment at the demobilization site; \n Procedures for dependants; and \n Fire precautions and physical safety.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -86250,7 +86250,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.2 Reception", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Contingent on the type of demobilization site, introductory briefings should cover, among other things, the following: \\n Site orientation; \\n Outline of activities and processes; \\n Routines and time schedules; \\n The rights and obligations of combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups throughout the demobilization process; \\n Rules and discipline, including areas that are off limits; \\n Policies concerning freedom of movement in and out of the demobilization site; \\n Policies on SGBV and the consequences of infringement of these policies; \\n Security at the demobilization site; \\n How to report misbehaviour, including specific mechanisms for women; \\n Mechanisms to raise complaints about conditions and treatment at the demobilization site; \\n Procedures for dependants; and \\n Fire precautions and physical safety.", + "Sentence": "Contingent on the type of demobilization site, introductory briefings should cover, among other things, the following: \n Site orientation; \n Outline of activities and processes; \n Routines and time schedules; \n The rights and obligations of combatants and persons associated with armed forces and groups throughout the demobilization process; \n Rules and discipline, including areas that are off limits; \n Policies concerning freedom of movement in and out of the demobilization site; \n Policies on SGBV and the consequences of infringement of these policies; \n Security at the demobilization site; \n How to report misbehaviour, including specific mechanisms for women; \n Mechanisms to raise complaints about conditions and treatment at the demobilization site; \n Procedures for dependants; and \n Fire precautions and physical safety.", "newParagraph": "combatant person associated armed force group provided clear simple guidance arrive demobilization site taking consideration level literacy ensure informed demobilization process right process rule regulation expected observe large number participant addressed key stick simple concept mainly complex explanation provided smaller group organized followup initial briefing help prevent unrest stress within group contingent type demobilization site introductory briefing cover among thing following n site orientation n outline activity process n routine time schedule n right obligation combatant person associated armed force group throughout demobilization process n rule discipline including area limit n policy concerning freedom movement demobilization site n policy sgbv consequence infringement policy n security demobilization site n report misbehaviour including specific mechanism woman n mechanism raise complaint condition treatment demobilization site n procedure dependant n fire precaution physical safety", "ProcessedSent": "contingent type demobilization site introductory briefing cover among thing following n site orientation n outline activity process n routine time schedule n right obligation combatant person associated armed force group throughout demobilization process n rule discipline including area limit n policy concerning freedom movement demobilization site n policy sgbv consequence infringement policy n security demobilization site n report misbehaviour including specific mechanism woman n mechanism raise complaint condition treatment demobilization site n procedure dependant n fire precaution physical safety", "SentID": 4791 @@ -86905,7 +86905,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1498, - "Paragraph": "Sensitization sessions can be an essential part of supporting the transition from military to civilian life and preparing DDR participants for their return to families and communities. Core sensitization may include sessions on: \\n Reproductive health, including HIV\/AIDS and STI awareness raising; \\n Psychosocial education and awareness raising, including the symptoms associated with post- traumatic stress, destigmatizing experiences, education on managing stress responses, navigating discussions with families and host communities, and when to seek help; \\n Conflict resolution, non-violent communication and anger management; \\n Human rights, including women\u2019s and children\u2019s rights; \\n Parenting, for both fathers and mothers; \\n Gender, for both men and women, including discussion on gender identities and how they may be impacted by the conflict, as well as roles and responsibilities in armed forces and groups and in the community (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR); and \\n First aid or other key skills. \\n\\n See Module 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR for additional guidance on SGBV mitigation and response during demobilization.", + "Paragraph": "Sensitization sessions can be an essential part of supporting the transition from military to civilian life and preparing DDR participants for their return to families and communities. Core sensitization may include sessions on: \n Reproductive health, including HIV\/AIDS and STI awareness raising; \n Psychosocial education and awareness raising, including the symptoms associated with post- traumatic stress, destigmatizing experiences, education on managing stress responses, navigating discussions with families and host communities, and when to seek help; \n Conflict resolution, non-violent communication and anger management; \n Human rights, including women\u2019s and children\u2019s rights; \n Parenting, for both fathers and mothers; \n Gender, for both men and women, including discussion on gender identities and how they may be impacted by the conflict, as well as roles and responsibilities in armed forces and groups and in the community (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR); and \n First aid or other key skills. \n\n See Module 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR for additional guidance on SGBV mitigation and response during demobilization.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -86923,7 +86923,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1498, - "Paragraph": "Sensitization sessions can be an essential part of supporting the transition from military to civilian life and preparing DDR participants for their return to families and communities. Core sensitization may include sessions on: \\n Reproductive health, including HIV\/AIDS and STI awareness raising; \\n Psychosocial education and awareness raising, including the symptoms associated with post- traumatic stress, destigmatizing experiences, education on managing stress responses, navigating discussions with families and host communities, and when to seek help; \\n Conflict resolution, non-violent communication and anger management; \\n Human rights, including women\u2019s and children\u2019s rights; \\n Parenting, for both fathers and mothers; \\n Gender, for both men and women, including discussion on gender identities and how they may be impacted by the conflict, as well as roles and responsibilities in armed forces and groups and in the community (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR); and \\n First aid or other key skills. \\n\\n See Module 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR for additional guidance on SGBV mitigation and response during demobilization.", + "Paragraph": "Sensitization sessions can be an essential part of supporting the transition from military to civilian life and preparing DDR participants for their return to families and communities. Core sensitization may include sessions on: \n Reproductive health, including HIV\/AIDS and STI awareness raising; \n Psychosocial education and awareness raising, including the symptoms associated with post- traumatic stress, destigmatizing experiences, education on managing stress responses, navigating discussions with families and host communities, and when to seek help; \n Conflict resolution, non-violent communication and anger management; \n Human rights, including women\u2019s and children\u2019s rights; \n Parenting, for both fathers and mothers; \n Gender, for both men and women, including discussion on gender identities and how they may be impacted by the conflict, as well as roles and responsibilities in armed forces and groups and in the community (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR); and \n First aid or other key skills. \n\n See Module 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR for additional guidance on SGBV mitigation and response during demobilization.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -86934,14 +86934,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.5 Awareness raising and sensitization", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Core sensitization may include sessions on: \\n Reproductive health, including HIV\/AIDS and STI awareness raising; \\n Psychosocial education and awareness raising, including the symptoms associated with post- traumatic stress, destigmatizing experiences, education on managing stress responses, navigating discussions with families and host communities, and when to seek help; \\n Conflict resolution, non-violent communication and anger management; \\n Human rights, including women\u2019s and children\u2019s rights; \\n Parenting, for both fathers and mothers; \\n Gender, for both men and women, including discussion on gender identities and how they may be impacted by the conflict, as well as roles and responsibilities in armed forces and groups and in the community (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR); and \\n First aid or other key skills.", + "Sentence": "Core sensitization may include sessions on: \n Reproductive health, including HIV\/AIDS and STI awareness raising; \n Psychosocial education and awareness raising, including the symptoms associated with post- traumatic stress, destigmatizing experiences, education on managing stress responses, navigating discussions with families and host communities, and when to seek help; \n Conflict resolution, non-violent communication and anger management; \n Human rights, including women\u2019s and children\u2019s rights; \n Parenting, for both fathers and mothers; \n Gender, for both men and women, including discussion on gender identities and how they may be impacted by the conflict, as well as roles and responsibilities in armed forces and groups and in the community (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR); and \n First aid or other key skills.", "newParagraph": "sensitization session essential part supporting transition military civilian life preparing ddr participant return family community core sensitization may include session n reproductive health including hivaids sti awareness raising n psychosocial education awareness raising including symptom associated post traumatic stress destigmatizing experience education managing stress response navigating discussion family host community seek help n conflict resolution nonviolent communication anger management n human right including woman child right n parenting father mother n gender men woman including discussion gender identity may impacted conflict well role responsibility armed force group community see iddrs 510 woman gender ddr n first aid key skill nn see module 510 woman gender ddr additional guidance sgbv mitigation response demobilization", "ProcessedSent": "core sensitization may include session n reproductive health including hivaids sti awareness raising n psychosocial education awareness raising including symptom associated post traumatic stress destigmatizing experience education managing stress response navigating discussion family host community seek help n conflict resolution nonviolent communication anger management n human right including woman child right n parenting father mother n gender men woman including discussion gender identity may impacted conflict well role responsibility armed force group community see iddrs 510 woman gender ddr n first aid key skill", "SentID": 4829 }, { "ParagraphID": 1498, - "Paragraph": "Sensitization sessions can be an essential part of supporting the transition from military to civilian life and preparing DDR participants for their return to families and communities. Core sensitization may include sessions on: \\n Reproductive health, including HIV\/AIDS and STI awareness raising; \\n Psychosocial education and awareness raising, including the symptoms associated with post- traumatic stress, destigmatizing experiences, education on managing stress responses, navigating discussions with families and host communities, and when to seek help; \\n Conflict resolution, non-violent communication and anger management; \\n Human rights, including women\u2019s and children\u2019s rights; \\n Parenting, for both fathers and mothers; \\n Gender, for both men and women, including discussion on gender identities and how they may be impacted by the conflict, as well as roles and responsibilities in armed forces and groups and in the community (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR); and \\n First aid or other key skills. \\n\\n See Module 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR for additional guidance on SGBV mitigation and response during demobilization.", + "Paragraph": "Sensitization sessions can be an essential part of supporting the transition from military to civilian life and preparing DDR participants for their return to families and communities. Core sensitization may include sessions on: \n Reproductive health, including HIV\/AIDS and STI awareness raising; \n Psychosocial education and awareness raising, including the symptoms associated with post- traumatic stress, destigmatizing experiences, education on managing stress responses, navigating discussions with families and host communities, and when to seek help; \n Conflict resolution, non-violent communication and anger management; \n Human rights, including women\u2019s and children\u2019s rights; \n Parenting, for both fathers and mothers; \n Gender, for both men and women, including discussion on gender identities and how they may be impacted by the conflict, as well as roles and responsibilities in armed forces and groups and in the community (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR); and \n First aid or other key skills. \n\n See Module 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR for additional guidance on SGBV mitigation and response during demobilization.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -86952,7 +86952,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.5 Awareness raising and sensitization", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n See Module 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR for additional guidance on SGBV mitigation and response during demobilization.", + "Sentence": "\n\n See Module 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR for additional guidance on SGBV mitigation and response during demobilization.", "newParagraph": "sensitization session essential part supporting transition military civilian life preparing ddr participant return family community core sensitization may include session n reproductive health including hivaids sti awareness raising n psychosocial education awareness raising including symptom associated post traumatic stress destigmatizing experience education managing stress response navigating discussion family host community seek help n conflict resolution nonviolent communication anger management n human right including woman child right n parenting father mother n gender men woman including discussion gender identity may impacted conflict well role responsibility armed force group community see iddrs 510 woman gender ddr n first aid key skill nn see module 510 woman gender ddr additional guidance sgbv mitigation response demobilization", "ProcessedSent": "nn see module 510 woman gender ddr additional guidance sgbv mitigation response demobilization", "SentID": 4830 @@ -87661,7 +87661,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1508, - "Paragraph": "This kind of transitional assistance may be provided in a number of different ways, including: \\n Cash-based transfers; \\n Commodity vouchers; \\n In-kind support; and \\n Public works programmes", + "Paragraph": "This kind of transitional assistance may be provided in a number of different ways, including: \n Cash-based transfers; \n Commodity vouchers; \n In-kind support; and \n Public works programmes", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -87672,7 +87672,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This kind of transitional assistance may be provided in a number of different ways, including: \\n Cash-based transfers; \\n Commodity vouchers; \\n In-kind support; and \\n Public works programmes", + "Sentence": "This kind of transitional assistance may be provided in a number of different ways, including: \n Cash-based transfers; \n Commodity vouchers; \n In-kind support; and \n Public works programmes", "newParagraph": "kind transitional assistance may provided number different way including n cashbased transfer n commodity voucher n inkind support n public work programme", "ProcessedSent": "kind transitional assistance may provided number different way including n cashbased transfer n commodity voucher n inkind support n public work programme", "SentID": 4870 @@ -88867,7 +88867,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1520, - "Paragraph": "Public works programmes must be preceded by needs and feasibility assessments. The willingness of civilians, ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups to undertake this kind of work must also be assessed. Public works programmes should only be implemented when markets are functioning (although this is not necessary for food for work programmes); when cash for work activities will not interfere with already-existing livelihood practices; and when the assets and infrastructure to be built or rehabilitated will meet the basic needs of the target population, be useful to the community and can be maintained. Additional key questions for determining the appropriateness of public works programmes include: \\n Is there sufficient useful work available? \\n Is the security situation conducive to public works programmes? \\n What are the risks for demobilized participants? \\n Would public works programmes disrupt traditional community practices that value unpaid collective work for the community? \\n Are both men and women interested in participating in public works programmes? Are there any specific cultural considerations? \\n What is the attitude of the community towards paid labour? \\n Will public works programmes compete with local labour and disrupt seasonal activities? \\n Do work activities vary by season? \\n Do demobilized participants require training and\/or equipment to conduct the work?", + "Paragraph": "Public works programmes must be preceded by needs and feasibility assessments. The willingness of civilians, ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups to undertake this kind of work must also be assessed. Public works programmes should only be implemented when markets are functioning (although this is not necessary for food for work programmes); when cash for work activities will not interfere with already-existing livelihood practices; and when the assets and infrastructure to be built or rehabilitated will meet the basic needs of the target population, be useful to the community and can be maintained. Additional key questions for determining the appropriateness of public works programmes include: \n Is there sufficient useful work available? \n Is the security situation conducive to public works programmes? \n What are the risks for demobilized participants? \n Would public works programmes disrupt traditional community practices that value unpaid collective work for the community? \n Are both men and women interested in participating in public works programmes? Are there any specific cultural considerations? \n What is the attitude of the community towards paid labour? \n Will public works programmes compete with local labour and disrupt seasonal activities? \n Do work activities vary by season? \n Do demobilized participants require training and\/or equipment to conduct the work?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -88885,7 +88885,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1520, - "Paragraph": "Public works programmes must be preceded by needs and feasibility assessments. The willingness of civilians, ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups to undertake this kind of work must also be assessed. Public works programmes should only be implemented when markets are functioning (although this is not necessary for food for work programmes); when cash for work activities will not interfere with already-existing livelihood practices; and when the assets and infrastructure to be built or rehabilitated will meet the basic needs of the target population, be useful to the community and can be maintained. Additional key questions for determining the appropriateness of public works programmes include: \\n Is there sufficient useful work available? \\n Is the security situation conducive to public works programmes? \\n What are the risks for demobilized participants? \\n Would public works programmes disrupt traditional community practices that value unpaid collective work for the community? \\n Are both men and women interested in participating in public works programmes? Are there any specific cultural considerations? \\n What is the attitude of the community towards paid labour? \\n Will public works programmes compete with local labour and disrupt seasonal activities? \\n Do work activities vary by season? \\n Do demobilized participants require training and\/or equipment to conduct the work?", + "Paragraph": "Public works programmes must be preceded by needs and feasibility assessments. The willingness of civilians, ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups to undertake this kind of work must also be assessed. Public works programmes should only be implemented when markets are functioning (although this is not necessary for food for work programmes); when cash for work activities will not interfere with already-existing livelihood practices; and when the assets and infrastructure to be built or rehabilitated will meet the basic needs of the target population, be useful to the community and can be maintained. Additional key questions for determining the appropriateness of public works programmes include: \n Is there sufficient useful work available? \n Is the security situation conducive to public works programmes? \n What are the risks for demobilized participants? \n Would public works programmes disrupt traditional community practices that value unpaid collective work for the community? \n Are both men and women interested in participating in public works programmes? Are there any specific cultural considerations? \n What is the attitude of the community towards paid labour? \n Will public works programmes compete with local labour and disrupt seasonal activities? \n Do work activities vary by season? \n Do demobilized participants require training and\/or equipment to conduct the work?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -88903,7 +88903,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1520, - "Paragraph": "Public works programmes must be preceded by needs and feasibility assessments. The willingness of civilians, ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups to undertake this kind of work must also be assessed. Public works programmes should only be implemented when markets are functioning (although this is not necessary for food for work programmes); when cash for work activities will not interfere with already-existing livelihood practices; and when the assets and infrastructure to be built or rehabilitated will meet the basic needs of the target population, be useful to the community and can be maintained. Additional key questions for determining the appropriateness of public works programmes include: \\n Is there sufficient useful work available? \\n Is the security situation conducive to public works programmes? \\n What are the risks for demobilized participants? \\n Would public works programmes disrupt traditional community practices that value unpaid collective work for the community? \\n Are both men and women interested in participating in public works programmes? Are there any specific cultural considerations? \\n What is the attitude of the community towards paid labour? \\n Will public works programmes compete with local labour and disrupt seasonal activities? \\n Do work activities vary by season? \\n Do demobilized participants require training and\/or equipment to conduct the work?", + "Paragraph": "Public works programmes must be preceded by needs and feasibility assessments. The willingness of civilians, ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups to undertake this kind of work must also be assessed. Public works programmes should only be implemented when markets are functioning (although this is not necessary for food for work programmes); when cash for work activities will not interfere with already-existing livelihood practices; and when the assets and infrastructure to be built or rehabilitated will meet the basic needs of the target population, be useful to the community and can be maintained. Additional key questions for determining the appropriateness of public works programmes include: \n Is there sufficient useful work available? \n Is the security situation conducive to public works programmes? \n What are the risks for demobilized participants? \n Would public works programmes disrupt traditional community practices that value unpaid collective work for the community? \n Are both men and women interested in participating in public works programmes? Are there any specific cultural considerations? \n What is the attitude of the community towards paid labour? \n Will public works programmes compete with local labour and disrupt seasonal activities? \n Do work activities vary by season? \n Do demobilized participants require training and\/or equipment to conduct the work?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -88921,7 +88921,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1520, - "Paragraph": "Public works programmes must be preceded by needs and feasibility assessments. The willingness of civilians, ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups to undertake this kind of work must also be assessed. Public works programmes should only be implemented when markets are functioning (although this is not necessary for food for work programmes); when cash for work activities will not interfere with already-existing livelihood practices; and when the assets and infrastructure to be built or rehabilitated will meet the basic needs of the target population, be useful to the community and can be maintained. Additional key questions for determining the appropriateness of public works programmes include: \\n Is there sufficient useful work available? \\n Is the security situation conducive to public works programmes? \\n What are the risks for demobilized participants? \\n Would public works programmes disrupt traditional community practices that value unpaid collective work for the community? \\n Are both men and women interested in participating in public works programmes? Are there any specific cultural considerations? \\n What is the attitude of the community towards paid labour? \\n Will public works programmes compete with local labour and disrupt seasonal activities? \\n Do work activities vary by season? \\n Do demobilized participants require training and\/or equipment to conduct the work?", + "Paragraph": "Public works programmes must be preceded by needs and feasibility assessments. The willingness of civilians, ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups to undertake this kind of work must also be assessed. Public works programmes should only be implemented when markets are functioning (although this is not necessary for food for work programmes); when cash for work activities will not interfere with already-existing livelihood practices; and when the assets and infrastructure to be built or rehabilitated will meet the basic needs of the target population, be useful to the community and can be maintained. Additional key questions for determining the appropriateness of public works programmes include: \n Is there sufficient useful work available? \n Is the security situation conducive to public works programmes? \n What are the risks for demobilized participants? \n Would public works programmes disrupt traditional community practices that value unpaid collective work for the community? \n Are both men and women interested in participating in public works programmes? Are there any specific cultural considerations? \n What is the attitude of the community towards paid labour? \n Will public works programmes compete with local labour and disrupt seasonal activities? \n Do work activities vary by season? \n Do demobilized participants require training and\/or equipment to conduct the work?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -88932,14 +88932,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3 Public works programmes", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Additional key questions for determining the appropriateness of public works programmes include: \\n Is there sufficient useful work available?", + "Sentence": "Additional key questions for determining the appropriateness of public works programmes include: \n Is there sufficient useful work available?", "newParagraph": "public work programme must preceded need feasibility assessment willingness civilian excombatants person formerly associated armed force group undertake kind work must also assessed public work programme implemented market functioning although necessary food work programme cash work activity interfere alreadyexisting livelihood practice asset infrastructure built rehabilitated meet basic need target population useful community maintained additional key question determining appropriateness public work programme include n sufficient useful work available n security situation conducive public work programme n risk demobilized participant n would public work programme disrupt traditional community practice value unpaid collective work community n men woman interested participating public work programme specific cultural consideration n attitude community towards paid labour n public work programme compete local labour disrupt seasonal activity n work activity vary season n demobilized participant require training andor equipment conduct work", "ProcessedSent": "additional key question determining appropriateness public work programme include n sufficient useful work available", "SentID": 4940 }, { "ParagraphID": 1520, - "Paragraph": "Public works programmes must be preceded by needs and feasibility assessments. The willingness of civilians, ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups to undertake this kind of work must also be assessed. Public works programmes should only be implemented when markets are functioning (although this is not necessary for food for work programmes); when cash for work activities will not interfere with already-existing livelihood practices; and when the assets and infrastructure to be built or rehabilitated will meet the basic needs of the target population, be useful to the community and can be maintained. Additional key questions for determining the appropriateness of public works programmes include: \\n Is there sufficient useful work available? \\n Is the security situation conducive to public works programmes? \\n What are the risks for demobilized participants? \\n Would public works programmes disrupt traditional community practices that value unpaid collective work for the community? \\n Are both men and women interested in participating in public works programmes? Are there any specific cultural considerations? \\n What is the attitude of the community towards paid labour? \\n Will public works programmes compete with local labour and disrupt seasonal activities? \\n Do work activities vary by season? \\n Do demobilized participants require training and\/or equipment to conduct the work?", + "Paragraph": "Public works programmes must be preceded by needs and feasibility assessments. The willingness of civilians, ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups to undertake this kind of work must also be assessed. Public works programmes should only be implemented when markets are functioning (although this is not necessary for food for work programmes); when cash for work activities will not interfere with already-existing livelihood practices; and when the assets and infrastructure to be built or rehabilitated will meet the basic needs of the target population, be useful to the community and can be maintained. Additional key questions for determining the appropriateness of public works programmes include: \n Is there sufficient useful work available? \n Is the security situation conducive to public works programmes? \n What are the risks for demobilized participants? \n Would public works programmes disrupt traditional community practices that value unpaid collective work for the community? \n Are both men and women interested in participating in public works programmes? Are there any specific cultural considerations? \n What is the attitude of the community towards paid labour? \n Will public works programmes compete with local labour and disrupt seasonal activities? \n Do work activities vary by season? \n Do demobilized participants require training and\/or equipment to conduct the work?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -88950,14 +88950,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3 Public works programmes", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Is the security situation conducive to public works programmes?", + "Sentence": "\n Is the security situation conducive to public works programmes?", "newParagraph": "public work programme must preceded need feasibility assessment willingness civilian excombatants person formerly associated armed force group undertake kind work must also assessed public work programme implemented market functioning although necessary food work programme cash work activity interfere alreadyexisting livelihood practice asset infrastructure built rehabilitated meet basic need target population useful community maintained additional key question determining appropriateness public work programme include n sufficient useful work available n security situation conducive public work programme n risk demobilized participant n would public work programme disrupt traditional community practice value unpaid collective work community n men woman interested participating public work programme specific cultural consideration n attitude community towards paid labour n public work programme compete local labour disrupt seasonal activity n work activity vary season n demobilized participant require training andor equipment conduct work", "ProcessedSent": "n security situation conducive public work programme", "SentID": 4941 }, { "ParagraphID": 1520, - "Paragraph": "Public works programmes must be preceded by needs and feasibility assessments. The willingness of civilians, ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups to undertake this kind of work must also be assessed. Public works programmes should only be implemented when markets are functioning (although this is not necessary for food for work programmes); when cash for work activities will not interfere with already-existing livelihood practices; and when the assets and infrastructure to be built or rehabilitated will meet the basic needs of the target population, be useful to the community and can be maintained. Additional key questions for determining the appropriateness of public works programmes include: \\n Is there sufficient useful work available? \\n Is the security situation conducive to public works programmes? \\n What are the risks for demobilized participants? \\n Would public works programmes disrupt traditional community practices that value unpaid collective work for the community? \\n Are both men and women interested in participating in public works programmes? Are there any specific cultural considerations? \\n What is the attitude of the community towards paid labour? \\n Will public works programmes compete with local labour and disrupt seasonal activities? \\n Do work activities vary by season? \\n Do demobilized participants require training and\/or equipment to conduct the work?", + "Paragraph": "Public works programmes must be preceded by needs and feasibility assessments. The willingness of civilians, ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups to undertake this kind of work must also be assessed. Public works programmes should only be implemented when markets are functioning (although this is not necessary for food for work programmes); when cash for work activities will not interfere with already-existing livelihood practices; and when the assets and infrastructure to be built or rehabilitated will meet the basic needs of the target population, be useful to the community and can be maintained. Additional key questions for determining the appropriateness of public works programmes include: \n Is there sufficient useful work available? \n Is the security situation conducive to public works programmes? \n What are the risks for demobilized participants? \n Would public works programmes disrupt traditional community practices that value unpaid collective work for the community? \n Are both men and women interested in participating in public works programmes? Are there any specific cultural considerations? \n What is the attitude of the community towards paid labour? \n Will public works programmes compete with local labour and disrupt seasonal activities? \n Do work activities vary by season? \n Do demobilized participants require training and\/or equipment to conduct the work?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -88968,14 +88968,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3 Public works programmes", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are the risks for demobilized participants?", + "Sentence": "\n What are the risks for demobilized participants?", "newParagraph": "public work programme must preceded need feasibility assessment willingness civilian excombatants person formerly associated armed force group undertake kind work must also assessed public work programme implemented market functioning although necessary food work programme cash work activity interfere alreadyexisting livelihood practice asset infrastructure built rehabilitated meet basic need target population useful community maintained additional key question determining appropriateness public work programme include n sufficient useful work available n security situation conducive public work programme n risk demobilized participant n would public work programme disrupt traditional community practice value unpaid collective work community n men woman interested participating public work programme specific cultural consideration n attitude community towards paid labour n public work programme compete local labour disrupt seasonal activity n work activity vary season n demobilized participant require training andor equipment conduct work", "ProcessedSent": "n risk demobilized participant", "SentID": 4942 }, { "ParagraphID": 1520, - "Paragraph": "Public works programmes must be preceded by needs and feasibility assessments. The willingness of civilians, ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups to undertake this kind of work must also be assessed. Public works programmes should only be implemented when markets are functioning (although this is not necessary for food for work programmes); when cash for work activities will not interfere with already-existing livelihood practices; and when the assets and infrastructure to be built or rehabilitated will meet the basic needs of the target population, be useful to the community and can be maintained. Additional key questions for determining the appropriateness of public works programmes include: \\n Is there sufficient useful work available? \\n Is the security situation conducive to public works programmes? \\n What are the risks for demobilized participants? \\n Would public works programmes disrupt traditional community practices that value unpaid collective work for the community? \\n Are both men and women interested in participating in public works programmes? Are there any specific cultural considerations? \\n What is the attitude of the community towards paid labour? \\n Will public works programmes compete with local labour and disrupt seasonal activities? \\n Do work activities vary by season? \\n Do demobilized participants require training and\/or equipment to conduct the work?", + "Paragraph": "Public works programmes must be preceded by needs and feasibility assessments. The willingness of civilians, ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups to undertake this kind of work must also be assessed. Public works programmes should only be implemented when markets are functioning (although this is not necessary for food for work programmes); when cash for work activities will not interfere with already-existing livelihood practices; and when the assets and infrastructure to be built or rehabilitated will meet the basic needs of the target population, be useful to the community and can be maintained. Additional key questions for determining the appropriateness of public works programmes include: \n Is there sufficient useful work available? \n Is the security situation conducive to public works programmes? \n What are the risks for demobilized participants? \n Would public works programmes disrupt traditional community practices that value unpaid collective work for the community? \n Are both men and women interested in participating in public works programmes? Are there any specific cultural considerations? \n What is the attitude of the community towards paid labour? \n Will public works programmes compete with local labour and disrupt seasonal activities? \n Do work activities vary by season? \n Do demobilized participants require training and\/or equipment to conduct the work?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -88986,14 +88986,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3 Public works programmes", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Would public works programmes disrupt traditional community practices that value unpaid collective work for the community?", + "Sentence": "\n Would public works programmes disrupt traditional community practices that value unpaid collective work for the community?", "newParagraph": "public work programme must preceded need feasibility assessment willingness civilian excombatants person formerly associated armed force group undertake kind work must also assessed public work programme implemented market functioning although necessary food work programme cash work activity interfere alreadyexisting livelihood practice asset infrastructure built rehabilitated meet basic need target population useful community maintained additional key question determining appropriateness public work programme include n sufficient useful work available n security situation conducive public work programme n risk demobilized participant n would public work programme disrupt traditional community practice value unpaid collective work community n men woman interested participating public work programme specific cultural consideration n attitude community towards paid labour n public work programme compete local labour disrupt seasonal activity n work activity vary season n demobilized participant require training andor equipment conduct work", "ProcessedSent": "n would public work programme disrupt traditional community practice value unpaid collective work community", "SentID": 4943 }, { "ParagraphID": 1520, - "Paragraph": "Public works programmes must be preceded by needs and feasibility assessments. The willingness of civilians, ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups to undertake this kind of work must also be assessed. Public works programmes should only be implemented when markets are functioning (although this is not necessary for food for work programmes); when cash for work activities will not interfere with already-existing livelihood practices; and when the assets and infrastructure to be built or rehabilitated will meet the basic needs of the target population, be useful to the community and can be maintained. Additional key questions for determining the appropriateness of public works programmes include: \\n Is there sufficient useful work available? \\n Is the security situation conducive to public works programmes? \\n What are the risks for demobilized participants? \\n Would public works programmes disrupt traditional community practices that value unpaid collective work for the community? \\n Are both men and women interested in participating in public works programmes? Are there any specific cultural considerations? \\n What is the attitude of the community towards paid labour? \\n Will public works programmes compete with local labour and disrupt seasonal activities? \\n Do work activities vary by season? \\n Do demobilized participants require training and\/or equipment to conduct the work?", + "Paragraph": "Public works programmes must be preceded by needs and feasibility assessments. The willingness of civilians, ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups to undertake this kind of work must also be assessed. Public works programmes should only be implemented when markets are functioning (although this is not necessary for food for work programmes); when cash for work activities will not interfere with already-existing livelihood practices; and when the assets and infrastructure to be built or rehabilitated will meet the basic needs of the target population, be useful to the community and can be maintained. Additional key questions for determining the appropriateness of public works programmes include: \n Is there sufficient useful work available? \n Is the security situation conducive to public works programmes? \n What are the risks for demobilized participants? \n Would public works programmes disrupt traditional community practices that value unpaid collective work for the community? \n Are both men and women interested in participating in public works programmes? Are there any specific cultural considerations? \n What is the attitude of the community towards paid labour? \n Will public works programmes compete with local labour and disrupt seasonal activities? \n Do work activities vary by season? \n Do demobilized participants require training and\/or equipment to conduct the work?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -89004,14 +89004,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3 Public works programmes", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Are both men and women interested in participating in public works programmes?", + "Sentence": "\n Are both men and women interested in participating in public works programmes?", "newParagraph": "public work programme must preceded need feasibility assessment willingness civilian excombatants person formerly associated armed force group undertake kind work must also assessed public work programme implemented market functioning although necessary food work programme cash work activity interfere alreadyexisting livelihood practice asset infrastructure built rehabilitated meet basic need target population useful community maintained additional key question determining appropriateness public work programme include n sufficient useful work available n security situation conducive public work programme n risk demobilized participant n would public work programme disrupt traditional community practice value unpaid collective work community n men woman interested participating public work programme specific cultural consideration n attitude community towards paid labour n public work programme compete local labour disrupt seasonal activity n work activity vary season n demobilized participant require training andor equipment conduct work", "ProcessedSent": "n men woman interested participating public work programme", "SentID": 4944 }, { "ParagraphID": 1520, - "Paragraph": "Public works programmes must be preceded by needs and feasibility assessments. The willingness of civilians, ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups to undertake this kind of work must also be assessed. Public works programmes should only be implemented when markets are functioning (although this is not necessary for food for work programmes); when cash for work activities will not interfere with already-existing livelihood practices; and when the assets and infrastructure to be built or rehabilitated will meet the basic needs of the target population, be useful to the community and can be maintained. Additional key questions for determining the appropriateness of public works programmes include: \\n Is there sufficient useful work available? \\n Is the security situation conducive to public works programmes? \\n What are the risks for demobilized participants? \\n Would public works programmes disrupt traditional community practices that value unpaid collective work for the community? \\n Are both men and women interested in participating in public works programmes? Are there any specific cultural considerations? \\n What is the attitude of the community towards paid labour? \\n Will public works programmes compete with local labour and disrupt seasonal activities? \\n Do work activities vary by season? \\n Do demobilized participants require training and\/or equipment to conduct the work?", + "Paragraph": "Public works programmes must be preceded by needs and feasibility assessments. The willingness of civilians, ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups to undertake this kind of work must also be assessed. Public works programmes should only be implemented when markets are functioning (although this is not necessary for food for work programmes); when cash for work activities will not interfere with already-existing livelihood practices; and when the assets and infrastructure to be built or rehabilitated will meet the basic needs of the target population, be useful to the community and can be maintained. Additional key questions for determining the appropriateness of public works programmes include: \n Is there sufficient useful work available? \n Is the security situation conducive to public works programmes? \n What are the risks for demobilized participants? \n Would public works programmes disrupt traditional community practices that value unpaid collective work for the community? \n Are both men and women interested in participating in public works programmes? Are there any specific cultural considerations? \n What is the attitude of the community towards paid labour? \n Will public works programmes compete with local labour and disrupt seasonal activities? \n Do work activities vary by season? \n Do demobilized participants require training and\/or equipment to conduct the work?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -89029,7 +89029,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1520, - "Paragraph": "Public works programmes must be preceded by needs and feasibility assessments. The willingness of civilians, ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups to undertake this kind of work must also be assessed. Public works programmes should only be implemented when markets are functioning (although this is not necessary for food for work programmes); when cash for work activities will not interfere with already-existing livelihood practices; and when the assets and infrastructure to be built or rehabilitated will meet the basic needs of the target population, be useful to the community and can be maintained. Additional key questions for determining the appropriateness of public works programmes include: \\n Is there sufficient useful work available? \\n Is the security situation conducive to public works programmes? \\n What are the risks for demobilized participants? \\n Would public works programmes disrupt traditional community practices that value unpaid collective work for the community? \\n Are both men and women interested in participating in public works programmes? Are there any specific cultural considerations? \\n What is the attitude of the community towards paid labour? \\n Will public works programmes compete with local labour and disrupt seasonal activities? \\n Do work activities vary by season? \\n Do demobilized participants require training and\/or equipment to conduct the work?", + "Paragraph": "Public works programmes must be preceded by needs and feasibility assessments. The willingness of civilians, ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups to undertake this kind of work must also be assessed. Public works programmes should only be implemented when markets are functioning (although this is not necessary for food for work programmes); when cash for work activities will not interfere with already-existing livelihood practices; and when the assets and infrastructure to be built or rehabilitated will meet the basic needs of the target population, be useful to the community and can be maintained. Additional key questions for determining the appropriateness of public works programmes include: \n Is there sufficient useful work available? \n Is the security situation conducive to public works programmes? \n What are the risks for demobilized participants? \n Would public works programmes disrupt traditional community practices that value unpaid collective work for the community? \n Are both men and women interested in participating in public works programmes? Are there any specific cultural considerations? \n What is the attitude of the community towards paid labour? \n Will public works programmes compete with local labour and disrupt seasonal activities? \n Do work activities vary by season? \n Do demobilized participants require training and\/or equipment to conduct the work?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -89040,14 +89040,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3 Public works programmes", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What is the attitude of the community towards paid labour?", + "Sentence": "\n What is the attitude of the community towards paid labour?", "newParagraph": "public work programme must preceded need feasibility assessment willingness civilian excombatants person formerly associated armed force group undertake kind work must also assessed public work programme implemented market functioning although necessary food work programme cash work activity interfere alreadyexisting livelihood practice asset infrastructure built rehabilitated meet basic need target population useful community maintained additional key question determining appropriateness public work programme include n sufficient useful work available n security situation conducive public work programme n risk demobilized participant n would public work programme disrupt traditional community practice value unpaid collective work community n men woman interested participating public work programme specific cultural consideration n attitude community towards paid labour n public work programme compete local labour disrupt seasonal activity n work activity vary season n demobilized participant require training andor equipment conduct work", "ProcessedSent": "n attitude community towards paid labour", "SentID": 4946 }, { "ParagraphID": 1520, - "Paragraph": "Public works programmes must be preceded by needs and feasibility assessments. The willingness of civilians, ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups to undertake this kind of work must also be assessed. Public works programmes should only be implemented when markets are functioning (although this is not necessary for food for work programmes); when cash for work activities will not interfere with already-existing livelihood practices; and when the assets and infrastructure to be built or rehabilitated will meet the basic needs of the target population, be useful to the community and can be maintained. Additional key questions for determining the appropriateness of public works programmes include: \\n Is there sufficient useful work available? \\n Is the security situation conducive to public works programmes? \\n What are the risks for demobilized participants? \\n Would public works programmes disrupt traditional community practices that value unpaid collective work for the community? \\n Are both men and women interested in participating in public works programmes? Are there any specific cultural considerations? \\n What is the attitude of the community towards paid labour? \\n Will public works programmes compete with local labour and disrupt seasonal activities? \\n Do work activities vary by season? \\n Do demobilized participants require training and\/or equipment to conduct the work?", + "Paragraph": "Public works programmes must be preceded by needs and feasibility assessments. The willingness of civilians, ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups to undertake this kind of work must also be assessed. Public works programmes should only be implemented when markets are functioning (although this is not necessary for food for work programmes); when cash for work activities will not interfere with already-existing livelihood practices; and when the assets and infrastructure to be built or rehabilitated will meet the basic needs of the target population, be useful to the community and can be maintained. Additional key questions for determining the appropriateness of public works programmes include: \n Is there sufficient useful work available? \n Is the security situation conducive to public works programmes? \n What are the risks for demobilized participants? \n Would public works programmes disrupt traditional community practices that value unpaid collective work for the community? \n Are both men and women interested in participating in public works programmes? Are there any specific cultural considerations? \n What is the attitude of the community towards paid labour? \n Will public works programmes compete with local labour and disrupt seasonal activities? \n Do work activities vary by season? \n Do demobilized participants require training and\/or equipment to conduct the work?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -89058,14 +89058,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3 Public works programmes", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Will public works programmes compete with local labour and disrupt seasonal activities?", + "Sentence": "\n Will public works programmes compete with local labour and disrupt seasonal activities?", "newParagraph": "public work programme must preceded need feasibility assessment willingness civilian excombatants person formerly associated armed force group undertake kind work must also assessed public work programme implemented market functioning although necessary food work programme cash work activity interfere alreadyexisting livelihood practice asset infrastructure built rehabilitated meet basic need target population useful community maintained additional key question determining appropriateness public work programme include n sufficient useful work available n security situation conducive public work programme n risk demobilized participant n would public work programme disrupt traditional community practice value unpaid collective work community n men woman interested participating public work programme specific cultural consideration n attitude community towards paid labour n public work programme compete local labour disrupt seasonal activity n work activity vary season n demobilized participant require training andor equipment conduct work", "ProcessedSent": "n public work programme compete local labour disrupt seasonal activity", "SentID": 4947 }, { "ParagraphID": 1520, - "Paragraph": "Public works programmes must be preceded by needs and feasibility assessments. The willingness of civilians, ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups to undertake this kind of work must also be assessed. Public works programmes should only be implemented when markets are functioning (although this is not necessary for food for work programmes); when cash for work activities will not interfere with already-existing livelihood practices; and when the assets and infrastructure to be built or rehabilitated will meet the basic needs of the target population, be useful to the community and can be maintained. Additional key questions for determining the appropriateness of public works programmes include: \\n Is there sufficient useful work available? \\n Is the security situation conducive to public works programmes? \\n What are the risks for demobilized participants? \\n Would public works programmes disrupt traditional community practices that value unpaid collective work for the community? \\n Are both men and women interested in participating in public works programmes? Are there any specific cultural considerations? \\n What is the attitude of the community towards paid labour? \\n Will public works programmes compete with local labour and disrupt seasonal activities? \\n Do work activities vary by season? \\n Do demobilized participants require training and\/or equipment to conduct the work?", + "Paragraph": "Public works programmes must be preceded by needs and feasibility assessments. The willingness of civilians, ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups to undertake this kind of work must also be assessed. Public works programmes should only be implemented when markets are functioning (although this is not necessary for food for work programmes); when cash for work activities will not interfere with already-existing livelihood practices; and when the assets and infrastructure to be built or rehabilitated will meet the basic needs of the target population, be useful to the community and can be maintained. Additional key questions for determining the appropriateness of public works programmes include: \n Is there sufficient useful work available? \n Is the security situation conducive to public works programmes? \n What are the risks for demobilized participants? \n Would public works programmes disrupt traditional community practices that value unpaid collective work for the community? \n Are both men and women interested in participating in public works programmes? Are there any specific cultural considerations? \n What is the attitude of the community towards paid labour? \n Will public works programmes compete with local labour and disrupt seasonal activities? \n Do work activities vary by season? \n Do demobilized participants require training and\/or equipment to conduct the work?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -89076,14 +89076,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3 Public works programmes", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Do work activities vary by season?", + "Sentence": "\n Do work activities vary by season?", "newParagraph": "public work programme must preceded need feasibility assessment willingness civilian excombatants person formerly associated armed force group undertake kind work must also assessed public work programme implemented market functioning although necessary food work programme cash work activity interfere alreadyexisting livelihood practice asset infrastructure built rehabilitated meet basic need target population useful community maintained additional key question determining appropriateness public work programme include n sufficient useful work available n security situation conducive public work programme n risk demobilized participant n would public work programme disrupt traditional community practice value unpaid collective work community n men woman interested participating public work programme specific cultural consideration n attitude community towards paid labour n public work programme compete local labour disrupt seasonal activity n work activity vary season n demobilized participant require training andor equipment conduct work", "ProcessedSent": "n work activity vary season", "SentID": 4948 }, { "ParagraphID": 1520, - "Paragraph": "Public works programmes must be preceded by needs and feasibility assessments. The willingness of civilians, ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups to undertake this kind of work must also be assessed. Public works programmes should only be implemented when markets are functioning (although this is not necessary for food for work programmes); when cash for work activities will not interfere with already-existing livelihood practices; and when the assets and infrastructure to be built or rehabilitated will meet the basic needs of the target population, be useful to the community and can be maintained. Additional key questions for determining the appropriateness of public works programmes include: \\n Is there sufficient useful work available? \\n Is the security situation conducive to public works programmes? \\n What are the risks for demobilized participants? \\n Would public works programmes disrupt traditional community practices that value unpaid collective work for the community? \\n Are both men and women interested in participating in public works programmes? Are there any specific cultural considerations? \\n What is the attitude of the community towards paid labour? \\n Will public works programmes compete with local labour and disrupt seasonal activities? \\n Do work activities vary by season? \\n Do demobilized participants require training and\/or equipment to conduct the work?", + "Paragraph": "Public works programmes must be preceded by needs and feasibility assessments. The willingness of civilians, ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups to undertake this kind of work must also be assessed. Public works programmes should only be implemented when markets are functioning (although this is not necessary for food for work programmes); when cash for work activities will not interfere with already-existing livelihood practices; and when the assets and infrastructure to be built or rehabilitated will meet the basic needs of the target population, be useful to the community and can be maintained. Additional key questions for determining the appropriateness of public works programmes include: \n Is there sufficient useful work available? \n Is the security situation conducive to public works programmes? \n What are the risks for demobilized participants? \n Would public works programmes disrupt traditional community practices that value unpaid collective work for the community? \n Are both men and women interested in participating in public works programmes? Are there any specific cultural considerations? \n What is the attitude of the community towards paid labour? \n Will public works programmes compete with local labour and disrupt seasonal activities? \n Do work activities vary by season? \n Do demobilized participants require training and\/or equipment to conduct the work?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -89094,7 +89094,7 @@ "Heading2": "7.3 Public works programmes", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Do demobilized participants require training and\/or equipment to conduct the work?", + "Sentence": "\n Do demobilized participants require training and\/or equipment to conduct the work?", "newParagraph": "public work programme must preceded need feasibility assessment willingness civilian excombatants person formerly associated armed force group undertake kind work must also assessed public work programme implemented market functioning although necessary food work programme cash work activity interfere alreadyexisting livelihood practice asset infrastructure built rehabilitated meet basic need target population useful community maintained additional key question determining appropriateness public work programme include n sufficient useful work available n security situation conducive public work programme n risk demobilized participant n would public work programme disrupt traditional community practice value unpaid collective work community n men woman interested participating public work programme specific cultural consideration n attitude community towards paid labour n public work programme compete local labour disrupt seasonal activity n work activity vary season n demobilized participant require training andor equipment conduct work", "ProcessedSent": "n demobilized participant require training andor equipment conduct work", "SentID": 4949 @@ -89353,7 +89353,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1523, - "Paragraph": "As explained above, cash, vouchers and in-kind support can be provided as part of a public works programme or as stand-alone reinsertion support. DDR practitioners should choose whether to use one of these transfer modalities (e.g., cash), or a mix of cash, vouchers and\/or in-kind support. At a minimum, the choice of a particular modality or combination of modalities should be based on: \\n The preference of recipients; \\n The ability of markets to supply goods at an appropriate price and quality; \\n The access of DDR participants to local markets; \\n The predicted effectiveness of different transfers in meeting the desired outcome; \\n The timeliness in which transitional reinsertion assistance can be delivered; \\n Time to delivery; \\n The potential negative impacts of different types of transfers; \\n The potential benefits of different types of transfers; \\n The comparative efficiency and cost of different types of transfers; \\n The risks associated with different types of transfers; \\n The protection risks related to gender; \\n The capacity of different organizations to deliver transfers; \\n The availability of reliable delivery mechanisms; and \\n Potential links to social protection programming.", + "Paragraph": "As explained above, cash, vouchers and in-kind support can be provided as part of a public works programme or as stand-alone reinsertion support. DDR practitioners should choose whether to use one of these transfer modalities (e.g., cash), or a mix of cash, vouchers and\/or in-kind support. At a minimum, the choice of a particular modality or combination of modalities should be based on: \n The preference of recipients; \n The ability of markets to supply goods at an appropriate price and quality; \n The access of DDR participants to local markets; \n The predicted effectiveness of different transfers in meeting the desired outcome; \n The timeliness in which transitional reinsertion assistance can be delivered; \n Time to delivery; \n The potential negative impacts of different types of transfers; \n The potential benefits of different types of transfers; \n The comparative efficiency and cost of different types of transfers; \n The risks associated with different types of transfers; \n The protection risks related to gender; \n The capacity of different organizations to deliver transfers; \n The availability of reliable delivery mechanisms; and \n Potential links to social protection programming.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -89371,7 +89371,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1523, - "Paragraph": "As explained above, cash, vouchers and in-kind support can be provided as part of a public works programme or as stand-alone reinsertion support. DDR practitioners should choose whether to use one of these transfer modalities (e.g., cash), or a mix of cash, vouchers and\/or in-kind support. At a minimum, the choice of a particular modality or combination of modalities should be based on: \\n The preference of recipients; \\n The ability of markets to supply goods at an appropriate price and quality; \\n The access of DDR participants to local markets; \\n The predicted effectiveness of different transfers in meeting the desired outcome; \\n The timeliness in which transitional reinsertion assistance can be delivered; \\n Time to delivery; \\n The potential negative impacts of different types of transfers; \\n The potential benefits of different types of transfers; \\n The comparative efficiency and cost of different types of transfers; \\n The risks associated with different types of transfers; \\n The protection risks related to gender; \\n The capacity of different organizations to deliver transfers; \\n The availability of reliable delivery mechanisms; and \\n Potential links to social protection programming.", + "Paragraph": "As explained above, cash, vouchers and in-kind support can be provided as part of a public works programme or as stand-alone reinsertion support. DDR practitioners should choose whether to use one of these transfer modalities (e.g., cash), or a mix of cash, vouchers and\/or in-kind support. At a minimum, the choice of a particular modality or combination of modalities should be based on: \n The preference of recipients; \n The ability of markets to supply goods at an appropriate price and quality; \n The access of DDR participants to local markets; \n The predicted effectiveness of different transfers in meeting the desired outcome; \n The timeliness in which transitional reinsertion assistance can be delivered; \n Time to delivery; \n The potential negative impacts of different types of transfers; \n The potential benefits of different types of transfers; \n The comparative efficiency and cost of different types of transfers; \n The risks associated with different types of transfers; \n The protection risks related to gender; \n The capacity of different organizations to deliver transfers; \n The availability of reliable delivery mechanisms; and \n Potential links to social protection programming.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -89389,7 +89389,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1523, - "Paragraph": "As explained above, cash, vouchers and in-kind support can be provided as part of a public works programme or as stand-alone reinsertion support. DDR practitioners should choose whether to use one of these transfer modalities (e.g., cash), or a mix of cash, vouchers and\/or in-kind support. At a minimum, the choice of a particular modality or combination of modalities should be based on: \\n The preference of recipients; \\n The ability of markets to supply goods at an appropriate price and quality; \\n The access of DDR participants to local markets; \\n The predicted effectiveness of different transfers in meeting the desired outcome; \\n The timeliness in which transitional reinsertion assistance can be delivered; \\n Time to delivery; \\n The potential negative impacts of different types of transfers; \\n The potential benefits of different types of transfers; \\n The comparative efficiency and cost of different types of transfers; \\n The risks associated with different types of transfers; \\n The protection risks related to gender; \\n The capacity of different organizations to deliver transfers; \\n The availability of reliable delivery mechanisms; and \\n Potential links to social protection programming.", + "Paragraph": "As explained above, cash, vouchers and in-kind support can be provided as part of a public works programme or as stand-alone reinsertion support. DDR practitioners should choose whether to use one of these transfer modalities (e.g., cash), or a mix of cash, vouchers and\/or in-kind support. At a minimum, the choice of a particular modality or combination of modalities should be based on: \n The preference of recipients; \n The ability of markets to supply goods at an appropriate price and quality; \n The access of DDR participants to local markets; \n The predicted effectiveness of different transfers in meeting the desired outcome; \n The timeliness in which transitional reinsertion assistance can be delivered; \n Time to delivery; \n The potential negative impacts of different types of transfers; \n The potential benefits of different types of transfers; \n The comparative efficiency and cost of different types of transfers; \n The risks associated with different types of transfers; \n The protection risks related to gender; \n The capacity of different organizations to deliver transfers; \n The availability of reliable delivery mechanisms; and \n Potential links to social protection programming.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -89400,7 +89400,7 @@ "Heading2": "7.4 Determining transfer modality", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "At a minimum, the choice of a particular modality or combination of modalities should be based on: \\n The preference of recipients; \\n The ability of markets to supply goods at an appropriate price and quality; \\n The access of DDR participants to local markets; \\n The predicted effectiveness of different transfers in meeting the desired outcome; \\n The timeliness in which transitional reinsertion assistance can be delivered; \\n Time to delivery; \\n The potential negative impacts of different types of transfers; \\n The potential benefits of different types of transfers; \\n The comparative efficiency and cost of different types of transfers; \\n The risks associated with different types of transfers; \\n The protection risks related to gender; \\n The capacity of different organizations to deliver transfers; \\n The availability of reliable delivery mechanisms; and \\n Potential links to social protection programming.", + "Sentence": "At a minimum, the choice of a particular modality or combination of modalities should be based on: \n The preference of recipients; \n The ability of markets to supply goods at an appropriate price and quality; \n The access of DDR participants to local markets; \n The predicted effectiveness of different transfers in meeting the desired outcome; \n The timeliness in which transitional reinsertion assistance can be delivered; \n Time to delivery; \n The potential negative impacts of different types of transfers; \n The potential benefits of different types of transfers; \n The comparative efficiency and cost of different types of transfers; \n The risks associated with different types of transfers; \n The protection risks related to gender; \n The capacity of different organizations to deliver transfers; \n The availability of reliable delivery mechanisms; and \n Potential links to social protection programming.", "newParagraph": "explained cash voucher inkind support provided part public work programme standalone reinsertion support ddr practitioner choose whether use one transfer modality eg cash mix cash voucher andor inkind support minimum choice particular modality combination modality based n preference recipient n ability market supply good appropriate price quality n access ddr participant local market n predicted effectiveness different transfer meeting desired outcome n timeliness transitional reinsertion assistance delivered n time delivery n potential negative impact different type transfer n potential benefit different type transfer n comparative efficiency cost different type transfer n risk associated different type transfer n protection risk related gender n capacity different organization deliver transfer n availability reliable delivery mechanism n potential link social protection programming", "ProcessedSent": "minimum choice particular modality combination modality based n preference recipient n ability market supply good appropriate price quality n access ddr participant local market n predicted effectiveness different transfer meeting desired outcome n timeliness transitional reinsertion assistance delivered n time delivery n potential negative impact different type transfer n potential benefit different type transfer n comparative efficiency cost different type transfer n risk associated different type transfer n protection risk related gender n capacity different organization deliver transfer n availability reliable delivery mechanism n potential link social protection programming", "SentID": 4966 @@ -89623,7 +89623,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1530, - "Paragraph": "As a participant in the DDR process, the terms of your benefits are conditional on the following: \\n 1. Your hand over of all weapons and ammunition; \\n 2. Your agreement to renounce military status; \\n 3. Your acceptance of and conformity with all rules and regulations during the full period of your stay at the disarmament and\/or demobilization site; \\n 4. Your agreement to respect the staff, officials and other demobilized combatants at the disarmament and\/or demobilization site; \\n 5. Your refraining from all criminal activity and contributing to your nation\u2019s development; \\n 6. Your cooperation with and participation in programmes designed to facilitate your return to civilian life.", + "Paragraph": "As a participant in the DDR process, the terms of your benefits are conditional on the following: \n 1. Your hand over of all weapons and ammunition; \n 2. Your agreement to renounce military status; \n 3. Your acceptance of and conformity with all rules and regulations during the full period of your stay at the disarmament and\/or demobilization site; \n 4. Your agreement to respect the staff, officials and other demobilized combatants at the disarmament and\/or demobilization site; \n 5. Your refraining from all criminal activity and contributing to your nation\u2019s development; \n 6. Your cooperation with and participation in programmes designed to facilitate your return to civilian life.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -89634,14 +89634,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "As a participant in the DDR process, the terms of your benefits are conditional on the following: \\n 1.", + "Sentence": "As a participant in the DDR process, the terms of your benefits are conditional on the following: \n 1.", "newParagraph": "participant ddr process term benefit conditional following n 1 hand weapon ammunition n 2 agreement renounce military status n 3 acceptance conformity rule regulation full period stay disarmament andor demobilization site n 4 agreement respect staff official demobilized combatant disarmament andor demobilization site n 5 refraining criminal activity contributing nation development n 6 cooperation participation programme designed facilitate return civilian life", "ProcessedSent": "participant ddr process term benefit conditional following n 1", "SentID": 4979 }, { "ParagraphID": 1530, - "Paragraph": "As a participant in the DDR process, the terms of your benefits are conditional on the following: \\n 1. Your hand over of all weapons and ammunition; \\n 2. Your agreement to renounce military status; \\n 3. Your acceptance of and conformity with all rules and regulations during the full period of your stay at the disarmament and\/or demobilization site; \\n 4. Your agreement to respect the staff, officials and other demobilized combatants at the disarmament and\/or demobilization site; \\n 5. Your refraining from all criminal activity and contributing to your nation\u2019s development; \\n 6. Your cooperation with and participation in programmes designed to facilitate your return to civilian life.", + "Paragraph": "As a participant in the DDR process, the terms of your benefits are conditional on the following: \n 1. Your hand over of all weapons and ammunition; \n 2. Your agreement to renounce military status; \n 3. Your acceptance of and conformity with all rules and regulations during the full period of your stay at the disarmament and\/or demobilization site; \n 4. Your agreement to respect the staff, officials and other demobilized combatants at the disarmament and\/or demobilization site; \n 5. Your refraining from all criminal activity and contributing to your nation\u2019s development; \n 6. Your cooperation with and participation in programmes designed to facilitate your return to civilian life.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -89652,14 +89652,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Your hand over of all weapons and ammunition; \\n 2.", + "Sentence": "Your hand over of all weapons and ammunition; \n 2.", "newParagraph": "participant ddr process term benefit conditional following n 1 hand weapon ammunition n 2 agreement renounce military status n 3 acceptance conformity rule regulation full period stay disarmament andor demobilization site n 4 agreement respect staff official demobilized combatant disarmament andor demobilization site n 5 refraining criminal activity contributing nation development n 6 cooperation participation programme designed facilitate return civilian life", "ProcessedSent": "hand weapon ammunition n 2", "SentID": 4980 }, { "ParagraphID": 1530, - "Paragraph": "As a participant in the DDR process, the terms of your benefits are conditional on the following: \\n 1. Your hand over of all weapons and ammunition; \\n 2. Your agreement to renounce military status; \\n 3. Your acceptance of and conformity with all rules and regulations during the full period of your stay at the disarmament and\/or demobilization site; \\n 4. Your agreement to respect the staff, officials and other demobilized combatants at the disarmament and\/or demobilization site; \\n 5. Your refraining from all criminal activity and contributing to your nation\u2019s development; \\n 6. Your cooperation with and participation in programmes designed to facilitate your return to civilian life.", + "Paragraph": "As a participant in the DDR process, the terms of your benefits are conditional on the following: \n 1. Your hand over of all weapons and ammunition; \n 2. Your agreement to renounce military status; \n 3. Your acceptance of and conformity with all rules and regulations during the full period of your stay at the disarmament and\/or demobilization site; \n 4. Your agreement to respect the staff, officials and other demobilized combatants at the disarmament and\/or demobilization site; \n 5. Your refraining from all criminal activity and contributing to your nation\u2019s development; \n 6. Your cooperation with and participation in programmes designed to facilitate your return to civilian life.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -89670,14 +89670,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Your agreement to renounce military status; \\n 3.", + "Sentence": "Your agreement to renounce military status; \n 3.", "newParagraph": "participant ddr process term benefit conditional following n 1 hand weapon ammunition n 2 agreement renounce military status n 3 acceptance conformity rule regulation full period stay disarmament andor demobilization site n 4 agreement respect staff official demobilized combatant disarmament andor demobilization site n 5 refraining criminal activity contributing nation development n 6 cooperation participation programme designed facilitate return civilian life", "ProcessedSent": "agreement renounce military status n 3", "SentID": 4981 }, { "ParagraphID": 1530, - "Paragraph": "As a participant in the DDR process, the terms of your benefits are conditional on the following: \\n 1. Your hand over of all weapons and ammunition; \\n 2. Your agreement to renounce military status; \\n 3. Your acceptance of and conformity with all rules and regulations during the full period of your stay at the disarmament and\/or demobilization site; \\n 4. Your agreement to respect the staff, officials and other demobilized combatants at the disarmament and\/or demobilization site; \\n 5. Your refraining from all criminal activity and contributing to your nation\u2019s development; \\n 6. Your cooperation with and participation in programmes designed to facilitate your return to civilian life.", + "Paragraph": "As a participant in the DDR process, the terms of your benefits are conditional on the following: \n 1. Your hand over of all weapons and ammunition; \n 2. Your agreement to renounce military status; \n 3. Your acceptance of and conformity with all rules and regulations during the full period of your stay at the disarmament and\/or demobilization site; \n 4. Your agreement to respect the staff, officials and other demobilized combatants at the disarmament and\/or demobilization site; \n 5. Your refraining from all criminal activity and contributing to your nation\u2019s development; \n 6. Your cooperation with and participation in programmes designed to facilitate your return to civilian life.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -89688,14 +89688,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Your acceptance of and conformity with all rules and regulations during the full period of your stay at the disarmament and\/or demobilization site; \\n 4.", + "Sentence": "Your acceptance of and conformity with all rules and regulations during the full period of your stay at the disarmament and\/or demobilization site; \n 4.", "newParagraph": "participant ddr process term benefit conditional following n 1 hand weapon ammunition n 2 agreement renounce military status n 3 acceptance conformity rule regulation full period stay disarmament andor demobilization site n 4 agreement respect staff official demobilized combatant disarmament andor demobilization site n 5 refraining criminal activity contributing nation development n 6 cooperation participation programme designed facilitate return civilian life", "ProcessedSent": "acceptance conformity rule regulation full period stay disarmament andor demobilization site n 4", "SentID": 4982 }, { "ParagraphID": 1530, - "Paragraph": "As a participant in the DDR process, the terms of your benefits are conditional on the following: \\n 1. Your hand over of all weapons and ammunition; \\n 2. Your agreement to renounce military status; \\n 3. Your acceptance of and conformity with all rules and regulations during the full period of your stay at the disarmament and\/or demobilization site; \\n 4. Your agreement to respect the staff, officials and other demobilized combatants at the disarmament and\/or demobilization site; \\n 5. Your refraining from all criminal activity and contributing to your nation\u2019s development; \\n 6. Your cooperation with and participation in programmes designed to facilitate your return to civilian life.", + "Paragraph": "As a participant in the DDR process, the terms of your benefits are conditional on the following: \n 1. Your hand over of all weapons and ammunition; \n 2. Your agreement to renounce military status; \n 3. Your acceptance of and conformity with all rules and regulations during the full period of your stay at the disarmament and\/or demobilization site; \n 4. Your agreement to respect the staff, officials and other demobilized combatants at the disarmament and\/or demobilization site; \n 5. Your refraining from all criminal activity and contributing to your nation\u2019s development; \n 6. Your cooperation with and participation in programmes designed to facilitate your return to civilian life.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -89706,14 +89706,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Your agreement to respect the staff, officials and other demobilized combatants at the disarmament and\/or demobilization site; \\n 5.", + "Sentence": "Your agreement to respect the staff, officials and other demobilized combatants at the disarmament and\/or demobilization site; \n 5.", "newParagraph": "participant ddr process term benefit conditional following n 1 hand weapon ammunition n 2 agreement renounce military status n 3 acceptance conformity rule regulation full period stay disarmament andor demobilization site n 4 agreement respect staff official demobilized combatant disarmament andor demobilization site n 5 refraining criminal activity contributing nation development n 6 cooperation participation programme designed facilitate return civilian life", "ProcessedSent": "agreement respect staff official demobilized combatant disarmament andor demobilization site n 5", "SentID": 4983 }, { "ParagraphID": 1530, - "Paragraph": "As a participant in the DDR process, the terms of your benefits are conditional on the following: \\n 1. Your hand over of all weapons and ammunition; \\n 2. Your agreement to renounce military status; \\n 3. Your acceptance of and conformity with all rules and regulations during the full period of your stay at the disarmament and\/or demobilization site; \\n 4. Your agreement to respect the staff, officials and other demobilized combatants at the disarmament and\/or demobilization site; \\n 5. Your refraining from all criminal activity and contributing to your nation\u2019s development; \\n 6. Your cooperation with and participation in programmes designed to facilitate your return to civilian life.", + "Paragraph": "As a participant in the DDR process, the terms of your benefits are conditional on the following: \n 1. Your hand over of all weapons and ammunition; \n 2. Your agreement to renounce military status; \n 3. Your acceptance of and conformity with all rules and regulations during the full period of your stay at the disarmament and\/or demobilization site; \n 4. Your agreement to respect the staff, officials and other demobilized combatants at the disarmament and\/or demobilization site; \n 5. Your refraining from all criminal activity and contributing to your nation\u2019s development; \n 6. Your cooperation with and participation in programmes designed to facilitate your return to civilian life.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -89724,14 +89724,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Your refraining from all criminal activity and contributing to your nation\u2019s development; \\n 6.", + "Sentence": "Your refraining from all criminal activity and contributing to your nation\u2019s development; \n 6.", "newParagraph": "participant ddr process term benefit conditional following n 1 hand weapon ammunition n 2 agreement renounce military status n 3 acceptance conformity rule regulation full period stay disarmament andor demobilization site n 4 agreement respect staff official demobilized combatant disarmament andor demobilization site n 5 refraining criminal activity contributing nation development n 6 cooperation participation programme designed facilitate return civilian life", "ProcessedSent": "refraining criminal activity contributing nation development n 6", "SentID": 4984 }, { "ParagraphID": 1530, - "Paragraph": "As a participant in the DDR process, the terms of your benefits are conditional on the following: \\n 1. Your hand over of all weapons and ammunition; \\n 2. Your agreement to renounce military status; \\n 3. Your acceptance of and conformity with all rules and regulations during the full period of your stay at the disarmament and\/or demobilization site; \\n 4. Your agreement to respect the staff, officials and other demobilized combatants at the disarmament and\/or demobilization site; \\n 5. Your refraining from all criminal activity and contributing to your nation\u2019s development; \\n 6. Your cooperation with and participation in programmes designed to facilitate your return to civilian life.", + "Paragraph": "As a participant in the DDR process, the terms of your benefits are conditional on the following: \n 1. Your hand over of all weapons and ammunition; \n 2. Your agreement to renounce military status; \n 3. Your acceptance of and conformity with all rules and regulations during the full period of your stay at the disarmament and\/or demobilization site; \n 4. Your agreement to respect the staff, officials and other demobilized combatants at the disarmament and\/or demobilization site; \n 5. Your refraining from all criminal activity and contributing to your nation\u2019s development; \n 6. Your cooperation with and participation in programmes designed to facilitate your return to civilian life.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -90091,7 +90091,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1538, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201da) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201da) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -90109,7 +90109,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1538, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201da) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the word \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201da) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -90120,14 +90120,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201da) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201da) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "ProcessedSent": "use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "SentID": 5006 }, { "ParagraphID": 1539, - "Paragraph": "DEFINING \u2018REINTEGRATION\u2019 \\n In the Note by the Secretary-General dated 24 May 2005, reintegration is defined as, \u201cthe process by which ex-com- batants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open timeframe, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility, and often necessitates long-term external assistance.\u201d \\n Recognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 Note, the Third Report of the Secretary-General on DDR (2011) includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration\u2026is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes,\u201d including interventions, such as psychosocial support, mental health counseling and clinical treatment and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/transitional justice, participation in political processes. \\n Additionally, it emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature\u2026the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the indi- vidual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d \\n Note by the Secretary-General on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations, 24 May 2005 (A\/C.5\/59\/31); Third report of the Secretary-General on Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741)", + "Paragraph": "DEFINING \u2018REINTEGRATION\u2019 \n In the Note by the Secretary-General dated 24 May 2005, reintegration is defined as, \u201cthe process by which ex-com- batants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open timeframe, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility, and often necessitates long-term external assistance.\u201d \n Recognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 Note, the Third Report of the Secretary-General on DDR (2011) includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration\u2026is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes,\u201d including interventions, such as psychosocial support, mental health counseling and clinical treatment and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/transitional justice, participation in political processes. \n Additionally, it emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature\u2026the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the indi- vidual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d \n Note by the Secretary-General on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations, 24 May 2005 (A\/C.5\/59\/31); Third report of the Secretary-General on Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741)", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -90138,14 +90138,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "DEFINING \u2018REINTEGRATION\u2019 \\n In the Note by the Secretary-General dated 24 May 2005, reintegration is defined as, \u201cthe process by which ex-com- batants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income.", + "Sentence": "DEFINING \u2018REINTEGRATION\u2019 \n In the Note by the Secretary-General dated 24 May 2005, reintegration is defined as, \u201cthe process by which ex-com- batants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income.", "newParagraph": "defining reintegration n note secretarygeneral dated 24 may 2005 reintegration defined process excom batants acquire civilian status gain sustainable employment income reintegration essentially social economic process open timeframe primarily taking place community local level part general development country national responsibility often necessitates longterm external assistance n recognizing new development reintegration excombatants associated group since release 2005 note third report secretarygeneral ddr 2011 includes revised policy guidance observes country economic aspect central sufficient sustainable reintegration excombatants serious consideration social political aspect reintegration also crucial sustainability success reintegration programme including intervention psychosocial support mental health counseling clinical treatment medical health support well reconciliation access justicetransitional justice participation political process n additionally emphasizes reintegration programme supported united nation timebound nature reintegration excombatants associated group longterm process take place indi vidual community national regional level dependent upon wider recovery development n note secretarygeneral administrative budgetary aspect financing un peacekeeping operation 24 may 2005 ac55931 third report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration 21 march 2011 a65741", "ProcessedSent": "defining reintegration n note secretarygeneral dated 24 may 2005 reintegration defined process excom batants acquire civilian status gain sustainable employment income", "SentID": 5007 }, { "ParagraphID": 1539, - "Paragraph": "DEFINING \u2018REINTEGRATION\u2019 \\n In the Note by the Secretary-General dated 24 May 2005, reintegration is defined as, \u201cthe process by which ex-com- batants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open timeframe, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility, and often necessitates long-term external assistance.\u201d \\n Recognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 Note, the Third Report of the Secretary-General on DDR (2011) includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration\u2026is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes,\u201d including interventions, such as psychosocial support, mental health counseling and clinical treatment and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/transitional justice, participation in political processes. \\n Additionally, it emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature\u2026the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the indi- vidual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d \\n Note by the Secretary-General on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations, 24 May 2005 (A\/C.5\/59\/31); Third report of the Secretary-General on Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741)", + "Paragraph": "DEFINING \u2018REINTEGRATION\u2019 \n In the Note by the Secretary-General dated 24 May 2005, reintegration is defined as, \u201cthe process by which ex-com- batants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open timeframe, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility, and often necessitates long-term external assistance.\u201d \n Recognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 Note, the Third Report of the Secretary-General on DDR (2011) includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration\u2026is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes,\u201d including interventions, such as psychosocial support, mental health counseling and clinical treatment and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/transitional justice, participation in political processes. \n Additionally, it emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature\u2026the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the indi- vidual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d \n Note by the Secretary-General on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations, 24 May 2005 (A\/C.5\/59\/31); Third report of the Secretary-General on Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741)", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -90163,7 +90163,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1539, - "Paragraph": "DEFINING \u2018REINTEGRATION\u2019 \\n In the Note by the Secretary-General dated 24 May 2005, reintegration is defined as, \u201cthe process by which ex-com- batants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open timeframe, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility, and often necessitates long-term external assistance.\u201d \\n Recognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 Note, the Third Report of the Secretary-General on DDR (2011) includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration\u2026is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes,\u201d including interventions, such as psychosocial support, mental health counseling and clinical treatment and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/transitional justice, participation in political processes. \\n Additionally, it emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature\u2026the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the indi- vidual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d \\n Note by the Secretary-General on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations, 24 May 2005 (A\/C.5\/59\/31); Third report of the Secretary-General on Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741)", + "Paragraph": "DEFINING \u2018REINTEGRATION\u2019 \n In the Note by the Secretary-General dated 24 May 2005, reintegration is defined as, \u201cthe process by which ex-com- batants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open timeframe, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility, and often necessitates long-term external assistance.\u201d \n Recognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 Note, the Third Report of the Secretary-General on DDR (2011) includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration\u2026is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes,\u201d including interventions, such as psychosocial support, mental health counseling and clinical treatment and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/transitional justice, participation in political processes. \n Additionally, it emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature\u2026the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the indi- vidual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d \n Note by the Secretary-General on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations, 24 May 2005 (A\/C.5\/59\/31); Third report of the Secretary-General on Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741)", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -90174,14 +90174,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility, and often necessitates long-term external assistance.\u201d \\n Recognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 Note, the Third Report of the Secretary-General on DDR (2011) includes revised policy and guidance.", + "Sentence": "It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility, and often necessitates long-term external assistance.\u201d \n Recognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 Note, the Third Report of the Secretary-General on DDR (2011) includes revised policy and guidance.", "newParagraph": "defining reintegration n note secretarygeneral dated 24 may 2005 reintegration defined process excom batants acquire civilian status gain sustainable employment income reintegration essentially social economic process open timeframe primarily taking place community local level part general development country national responsibility often necessitates longterm external assistance n recognizing new development reintegration excombatants associated group since release 2005 note third report secretarygeneral ddr 2011 includes revised policy guidance observes country economic aspect central sufficient sustainable reintegration excombatants serious consideration social political aspect reintegration also crucial sustainability success reintegration programme including intervention psychosocial support mental health counseling clinical treatment medical health support well reconciliation access justicetransitional justice participation political process n additionally emphasizes reintegration programme supported united nation timebound nature reintegration excombatants associated group longterm process take place indi vidual community national regional level dependent upon wider recovery development n note secretarygeneral administrative budgetary aspect financing un peacekeeping operation 24 may 2005 ac55931 third report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration 21 march 2011 a65741", "ProcessedSent": "part general development country national responsibility often necessitates longterm external assistance n recognizing new development reintegration excombatants associated group since release 2005 note third report secretarygeneral ddr 2011 includes revised policy guidance", "SentID": 5009 }, { "ParagraphID": 1539, - "Paragraph": "DEFINING \u2018REINTEGRATION\u2019 \\n In the Note by the Secretary-General dated 24 May 2005, reintegration is defined as, \u201cthe process by which ex-com- batants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open timeframe, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility, and often necessitates long-term external assistance.\u201d \\n Recognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 Note, the Third Report of the Secretary-General on DDR (2011) includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration\u2026is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes,\u201d including interventions, such as psychosocial support, mental health counseling and clinical treatment and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/transitional justice, participation in political processes. \\n Additionally, it emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature\u2026the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the indi- vidual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d \\n Note by the Secretary-General on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations, 24 May 2005 (A\/C.5\/59\/31); Third report of the Secretary-General on Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741)", + "Paragraph": "DEFINING \u2018REINTEGRATION\u2019 \n In the Note by the Secretary-General dated 24 May 2005, reintegration is defined as, \u201cthe process by which ex-com- batants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open timeframe, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility, and often necessitates long-term external assistance.\u201d \n Recognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 Note, the Third Report of the Secretary-General on DDR (2011) includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration\u2026is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes,\u201d including interventions, such as psychosocial support, mental health counseling and clinical treatment and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/transitional justice, participation in political processes. \n Additionally, it emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature\u2026the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the indi- vidual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d \n Note by the Secretary-General on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations, 24 May 2005 (A\/C.5\/59\/31); Third report of the Secretary-General on Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741)", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -90199,7 +90199,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1539, - "Paragraph": "DEFINING \u2018REINTEGRATION\u2019 \\n In the Note by the Secretary-General dated 24 May 2005, reintegration is defined as, \u201cthe process by which ex-com- batants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open timeframe, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility, and often necessitates long-term external assistance.\u201d \\n Recognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 Note, the Third Report of the Secretary-General on DDR (2011) includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration\u2026is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes,\u201d including interventions, such as psychosocial support, mental health counseling and clinical treatment and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/transitional justice, participation in political processes. \\n Additionally, it emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature\u2026the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the indi- vidual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d \\n Note by the Secretary-General on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations, 24 May 2005 (A\/C.5\/59\/31); Third report of the Secretary-General on Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741)", + "Paragraph": "DEFINING \u2018REINTEGRATION\u2019 \n In the Note by the Secretary-General dated 24 May 2005, reintegration is defined as, \u201cthe process by which ex-com- batants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open timeframe, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility, and often necessitates long-term external assistance.\u201d \n Recognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 Note, the Third Report of the Secretary-General on DDR (2011) includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration\u2026is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes,\u201d including interventions, such as psychosocial support, mental health counseling and clinical treatment and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/transitional justice, participation in political processes. \n Additionally, it emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature\u2026the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the indi- vidual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d \n Note by the Secretary-General on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations, 24 May 2005 (A\/C.5\/59\/31); Third report of the Secretary-General on Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741)", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -90217,7 +90217,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1539, - "Paragraph": "DEFINING \u2018REINTEGRATION\u2019 \\n In the Note by the Secretary-General dated 24 May 2005, reintegration is defined as, \u201cthe process by which ex-com- batants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open timeframe, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility, and often necessitates long-term external assistance.\u201d \\n Recognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 Note, the Third Report of the Secretary-General on DDR (2011) includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration\u2026is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes,\u201d including interventions, such as psychosocial support, mental health counseling and clinical treatment and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/transitional justice, participation in political processes. \\n Additionally, it emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature\u2026the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the indi- vidual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d \\n Note by the Secretary-General on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations, 24 May 2005 (A\/C.5\/59\/31); Third report of the Secretary-General on Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741)", + "Paragraph": "DEFINING \u2018REINTEGRATION\u2019 \n In the Note by the Secretary-General dated 24 May 2005, reintegration is defined as, \u201cthe process by which ex-com- batants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. Reintegration is essentially a social and economic process with an open timeframe, primarily taking place in communities at the local level. It is part of the general development of a country and a national responsibility, and often necessitates long-term external assistance.\u201d \n Recognizing new developments in the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups since the release of the 2005 Note, the Third Report of the Secretary-General on DDR (2011) includes revised policy and guidance. It observes that, \u201cin most countries, economic aspects, while central, are not sufficient for the sustainable reintegration of ex-combatants. Serious consideration of the social and political aspects of reintegration\u2026is [also] crucial for the sustainability and success of reintegration programmes,\u201d including interventions, such as psychosocial support, mental health counseling and clinical treatment and medical health support, as well as reconciliation, access to justice\/transitional justice, participation in political processes. \n Additionally, it emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature\u2026the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the indi- vidual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d \n Note by the Secretary-General on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations, 24 May 2005 (A\/C.5\/59\/31); Third report of the Secretary-General on Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741)", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -90228,7 +90228,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Additionally, it emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature\u2026the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the indi- vidual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d \\n Note by the Secretary-General on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations, 24 May 2005 (A\/C.5\/59\/31); Third report of the Secretary-General on Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741)", + "Sentence": "\n Additionally, it emphasizes that while \u201creintegration programmes supported by the United Nations are time-bound by nature\u2026the reintegration of ex-combatants and associated groups is a long-term process that takes place at the indi- vidual, community, national and regional levels, and is dependent upon wider recovery and development.\u201d \n Note by the Secretary-General on administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of UN peacekeeping operations, 24 May 2005 (A\/C.5\/59\/31); Third report of the Secretary-General on Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration, 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741)", "newParagraph": "defining reintegration n note secretarygeneral dated 24 may 2005 reintegration defined process excom batants acquire civilian status gain sustainable employment income reintegration essentially social economic process open timeframe primarily taking place community local level part general development country national responsibility often necessitates longterm external assistance n recognizing new development reintegration excombatants associated group since release 2005 note third report secretarygeneral ddr 2011 includes revised policy guidance observes country economic aspect central sufficient sustainable reintegration excombatants serious consideration social political aspect reintegration also crucial sustainability success reintegration programme including intervention psychosocial support mental health counseling clinical treatment medical health support well reconciliation access justicetransitional justice participation political process n additionally emphasizes reintegration programme supported united nation timebound nature reintegration excombatants associated group longterm process take place indi vidual community national regional level dependent upon wider recovery development n note secretarygeneral administrative budgetary aspect financing un peacekeeping operation 24 may 2005 ac55931 third report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration 21 march 2011 a65741", "ProcessedSent": "n additionally emphasizes reintegration programme supported united nation timebound nature reintegration excombatants associated group longterm process take place indi vidual community national regional level dependent upon wider recovery development n note secretarygeneral administrative budgetary aspect financing un peacekeeping operation 24 may 2005 ac55931 third report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration 21 march 2011 a65741", "SentID": 5012 @@ -92845,7 +92845,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1588, - "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \\n\\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \\n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \\n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \\n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \\n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \\n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \\n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \\n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \\n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \\n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \\n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", + "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \n\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -92856,14 +92856,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1. Overview", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \\n\\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \\n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question?", + "Sentence": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \n\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question?", "newParagraph": "planning phase reintegration programme based clear ass ments minimum ask following question nn key reintegration planning question assessment answer n reintegration approach combination approach suitable context question dual targeting excombatantled economic activity benefit also community n excombatants access areabased programme conflictaffected group would prevent programme track number excombatants participating level reintegration achieved n geographical coverage programme focus rural urban reintegration combination n narrow expansive eligibility criterion participate programme based excombatant returnee status vulnerability n type reintegration assistance offered ie economic social psychosocial andor political level intensity n strategy deployed match supply demand eg employabilityemployment creation psychosocial need traumapsychosocial counseling service etc n appropriate structure provide programme assistance dedicated structure created ddr programme information counseling referral service existing state structure implementing partner n capacity potential implementing partner n cost per participant reasonable comparison similar programme operational cost comparable similar programme n resource maximized partnership linkage existing programme", "ProcessedSent": "planning phase reintegration programme based clear ass ments minimum ask following question nn key reintegration planning question assessment answer n reintegration approach combination approach suitable context question", "SentID": 5158 }, { "ParagraphID": 1588, - "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \\n\\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \\n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \\n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \\n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \\n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \\n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \\n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \\n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \\n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \\n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \\n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", + "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \n\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -92881,7 +92881,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1588, - "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \\n\\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \\n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \\n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \\n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \\n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \\n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \\n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \\n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \\n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \\n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \\n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", + "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \n\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -92899,7 +92899,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1588, - "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \\n\\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \\n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \\n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \\n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \\n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \\n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \\n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \\n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \\n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \\n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \\n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", + "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \n\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -92910,14 +92910,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1. Overview", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group?", + "Sentence": "\n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group?", "newParagraph": "planning phase reintegration programme based clear ass ments minimum ask following question nn key reintegration planning question assessment answer n reintegration approach combination approach suitable context question dual targeting excombatantled economic activity benefit also community n excombatants access areabased programme conflictaffected group would prevent programme track number excombatants participating level reintegration achieved n geographical coverage programme focus rural urban reintegration combination n narrow expansive eligibility criterion participate programme based excombatant returnee status vulnerability n type reintegration assistance offered ie economic social psychosocial andor political level intensity n strategy deployed match supply demand eg employabilityemployment creation psychosocial need traumapsychosocial counseling service etc n appropriate structure provide programme assistance dedicated structure created ddr programme information counseling referral service existing state structure implementing partner n capacity potential implementing partner n cost per participant reasonable comparison similar programme operational cost comparable similar programme n resource maximized partnership linkage existing programme", "ProcessedSent": "n excombatants access areabased programme conflictaffected group", "SentID": 5161 }, { "ParagraphID": 1588, - "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \\n\\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \\n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \\n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \\n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \\n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \\n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \\n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \\n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \\n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \\n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \\n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", + "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \n\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -92935,7 +92935,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1588, - "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \\n\\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \\n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \\n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \\n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \\n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \\n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \\n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \\n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \\n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \\n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \\n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", + "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \n\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -92953,7 +92953,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1588, - "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \\n\\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \\n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \\n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \\n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \\n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \\n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \\n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \\n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \\n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \\n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \\n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", + "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \n\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -92964,14 +92964,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1. Overview", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme?", + "Sentence": "\n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme?", "newParagraph": "planning phase reintegration programme based clear ass ments minimum ask following question nn key reintegration planning question assessment answer n reintegration approach combination approach suitable context question dual targeting excombatantled economic activity benefit also community n excombatants access areabased programme conflictaffected group would prevent programme track number excombatants participating level reintegration achieved n geographical coverage programme focus rural urban reintegration combination n narrow expansive eligibility criterion participate programme based excombatant returnee status vulnerability n type reintegration assistance offered ie economic social psychosocial andor political level intensity n strategy deployed match supply demand eg employabilityemployment creation psychosocial need traumapsychosocial counseling service etc n appropriate structure provide programme assistance dedicated structure created ddr programme information counseling referral service existing state structure implementing partner n capacity potential implementing partner n cost per participant reasonable comparison similar programme operational cost comparable similar programme n resource maximized partnership linkage existing programme", "ProcessedSent": "n geographical coverage programme", "SentID": 5164 }, { "ParagraphID": 1588, - "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \\n\\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \\n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \\n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \\n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \\n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \\n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \\n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \\n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \\n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \\n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \\n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", + "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \n\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -92989,7 +92989,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1588, - "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \\n\\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \\n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \\n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \\n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \\n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \\n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \\n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \\n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \\n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \\n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \\n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", + "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \n\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -93000,14 +93000,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1. Overview", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme?", + "Sentence": "\n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme?", "newParagraph": "planning phase reintegration programme based clear ass ments minimum ask following question nn key reintegration planning question assessment answer n reintegration approach combination approach suitable context question dual targeting excombatantled economic activity benefit also community n excombatants access areabased programme conflictaffected group would prevent programme track number excombatants participating level reintegration achieved n geographical coverage programme focus rural urban reintegration combination n narrow expansive eligibility criterion participate programme based excombatant returnee status vulnerability n type reintegration assistance offered ie economic social psychosocial andor political level intensity n strategy deployed match supply demand eg employabilityemployment creation psychosocial need traumapsychosocial counseling service etc n appropriate structure provide programme assistance dedicated structure created ddr programme information counseling referral service existing state structure implementing partner n capacity potential implementing partner n cost per participant reasonable comparison similar programme operational cost comparable similar programme n resource maximized partnership linkage existing programme", "ProcessedSent": "n narrow expansive eligibility criterion participate programme", "SentID": 5166 }, { "ParagraphID": 1588, - "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \\n\\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \\n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \\n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \\n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \\n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \\n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \\n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \\n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \\n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \\n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \\n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", + "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \n\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -93025,7 +93025,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1588, - "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \\n\\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \\n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \\n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \\n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \\n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \\n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \\n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \\n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \\n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \\n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \\n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", + "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \n\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -93036,14 +93036,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1. Overview", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e.", + "Sentence": "\n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e.", "newParagraph": "planning phase reintegration programme based clear ass ments minimum ask following question nn key reintegration planning question assessment answer n reintegration approach combination approach suitable context question dual targeting excombatantled economic activity benefit also community n excombatants access areabased programme conflictaffected group would prevent programme track number excombatants participating level reintegration achieved n geographical coverage programme focus rural urban reintegration combination n narrow expansive eligibility criterion participate programme based excombatant returnee status vulnerability n type reintegration assistance offered ie economic social psychosocial andor political level intensity n strategy deployed match supply demand eg employabilityemployment creation psychosocial need traumapsychosocial counseling service etc n appropriate structure provide programme assistance dedicated structure created ddr programme information counseling referral service existing state structure implementing partner n capacity potential implementing partner n cost per participant reasonable comparison similar programme operational cost comparable similar programme n resource maximized partnership linkage existing programme", "ProcessedSent": "n type reintegration assistance offered ie", "SentID": 5168 }, { "ParagraphID": 1588, - "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \\n\\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \\n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \\n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \\n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \\n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \\n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \\n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \\n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \\n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \\n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \\n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", + "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \n\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -93061,7 +93061,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1588, - "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \\n\\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \\n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \\n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \\n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \\n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \\n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \\n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \\n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \\n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \\n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \\n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", + "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \n\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -93072,14 +93072,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1. Overview", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g.", + "Sentence": "\n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g.", "newParagraph": "planning phase reintegration programme based clear ass ments minimum ask following question nn key reintegration planning question assessment answer n reintegration approach combination approach suitable context question dual targeting excombatantled economic activity benefit also community n excombatants access areabased programme conflictaffected group would prevent programme track number excombatants participating level reintegration achieved n geographical coverage programme focus rural urban reintegration combination n narrow expansive eligibility criterion participate programme based excombatant returnee status vulnerability n type reintegration assistance offered ie economic social psychosocial andor political level intensity n strategy deployed match supply demand eg employabilityemployment creation psychosocial need traumapsychosocial counseling service etc n appropriate structure provide programme assistance dedicated structure created ddr programme information counseling referral service existing state structure implementing partner n capacity potential implementing partner n cost per participant reasonable comparison similar programme operational cost comparable similar programme n resource maximized partnership linkage existing programme", "ProcessedSent": "n strategy deployed match supply demand eg", "SentID": 5170 }, { "ParagraphID": 1588, - "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \\n\\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \\n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \\n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \\n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \\n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \\n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \\n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \\n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \\n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \\n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \\n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", + "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \n\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -93097,7 +93097,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1588, - "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \\n\\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \\n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \\n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \\n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \\n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \\n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \\n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \\n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \\n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \\n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \\n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", + "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \n\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -93108,14 +93108,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1. Overview", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance?", + "Sentence": "\n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance?", "newParagraph": "planning phase reintegration programme based clear ass ments minimum ask following question nn key reintegration planning question assessment answer n reintegration approach combination approach suitable context question dual targeting excombatantled economic activity benefit also community n excombatants access areabased programme conflictaffected group would prevent programme track number excombatants participating level reintegration achieved n geographical coverage programme focus rural urban reintegration combination n narrow expansive eligibility criterion participate programme based excombatant returnee status vulnerability n type reintegration assistance offered ie economic social psychosocial andor political level intensity n strategy deployed match supply demand eg employabilityemployment creation psychosocial need traumapsychosocial counseling service etc n appropriate structure provide programme assistance dedicated structure created ddr programme information counseling referral service existing state structure implementing partner n capacity potential implementing partner n cost per participant reasonable comparison similar programme operational cost comparable similar programme n resource maximized partnership linkage existing programme", "ProcessedSent": "n appropriate structure provide programme assistance", "SentID": 5172 }, { "ParagraphID": 1588, - "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \\n\\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \\n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \\n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \\n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \\n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \\n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \\n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \\n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \\n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \\n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \\n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", + "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \n\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -93133,7 +93133,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1588, - "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \\n\\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \\n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \\n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \\n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \\n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \\n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \\n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \\n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \\n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \\n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \\n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", + "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \n\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -93151,7 +93151,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1588, - "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \\n\\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \\n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \\n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \\n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \\n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \\n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \\n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \\n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \\n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \\n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \\n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", + "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \n\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -93169,7 +93169,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1588, - "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \\n\\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \\n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \\n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \\n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \\n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \\n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \\n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \\n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \\n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \\n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \\n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", + "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \n\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -93187,7 +93187,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1588, - "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \\n\\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \\n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \\n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \\n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \\n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \\n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \\n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \\n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \\n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \\n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \\n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", + "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \n\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -93198,14 +93198,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1. Overview", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners?", + "Sentence": "\n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners?", "newParagraph": "planning phase reintegration programme based clear ass ments minimum ask following question nn key reintegration planning question assessment answer n reintegration approach combination approach suitable context question dual targeting excombatantled economic activity benefit also community n excombatants access areabased programme conflictaffected group would prevent programme track number excombatants participating level reintegration achieved n geographical coverage programme focus rural urban reintegration combination n narrow expansive eligibility criterion participate programme based excombatant returnee status vulnerability n type reintegration assistance offered ie economic social psychosocial andor political level intensity n strategy deployed match supply demand eg employabilityemployment creation psychosocial need traumapsychosocial counseling service etc n appropriate structure provide programme assistance dedicated structure created ddr programme information counseling referral service existing state structure implementing partner n capacity potential implementing partner n cost per participant reasonable comparison similar programme operational cost comparable similar programme n resource maximized partnership linkage existing programme", "ProcessedSent": "n capacity potential implementing partner", "SentID": 5177 }, { "ParagraphID": 1588, - "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \\n\\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \\n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \\n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \\n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \\n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \\n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \\n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \\n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \\n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \\n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \\n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", + "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \n\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -93216,14 +93216,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1. Overview", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes?", + "Sentence": "\n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes?", "newParagraph": "planning phase reintegration programme based clear ass ments minimum ask following question nn key reintegration planning question assessment answer n reintegration approach combination approach suitable context question dual targeting excombatantled economic activity benefit also community n excombatants access areabased programme conflictaffected group would prevent programme track number excombatants participating level reintegration achieved n geographical coverage programme focus rural urban reintegration combination n narrow expansive eligibility criterion participate programme based excombatant returnee status vulnerability n type reintegration assistance offered ie economic social psychosocial andor political level intensity n strategy deployed match supply demand eg employabilityemployment creation psychosocial need traumapsychosocial counseling service etc n appropriate structure provide programme assistance dedicated structure created ddr programme information counseling referral service existing state structure implementing partner n capacity potential implementing partner n cost per participant reasonable comparison similar programme operational cost comparable similar programme n resource maximized partnership linkage existing programme", "ProcessedSent": "n cost per participant reasonable comparison similar programme", "SentID": 5178 }, { "ParagraphID": 1588, - "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \\n\\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \\n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \\n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \\n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \\n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \\n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \\n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \\n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \\n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \\n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \\n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", + "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \n\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -93241,7 +93241,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1588, - "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \\n\\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \\n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \\n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \\n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \\n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \\n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \\n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \\n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \\n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \\n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \\n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", + "Paragraph": "The planning phase of a reintegration programme should be based on clear assess- ments that, at a minimum, ask the following questions: \n\n KEY REINTEGRATION PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT ASSESSMENTS SHOULD ANSWER \n What reintegration approach or combination of approaches will be most suitable for the context in question? Dual targeting? Ex-combatant-led economic activity that benefits also the community? \n Will ex-combatants access area-based programmes as any other conflict-affected group? What would prevent them from doing that? How will these programmes track numbers of ex-combatants participating and the levels of reintegration achieved? \n What will be the geographical coverage of the programme? Will focus be on rural or urban reintegration or a combination of both? \n How narrow or expansive will be the eligibility criteria to participate in the programme? Based on ex-combatant\/ returnee status or vulnerability? \n What type of reintegration assistance should be offered (i.e. economic, social, psychosocial, and\/or political) and with which levels of intensity? \n What strategy will be deployed to match supply and demand (e.g. employability\/employment creation; psychosocial need such as trauma\/psychosocial counseling service; etc.) \n What are the most appropriate structures to provide programme assistance? Dedicated structures created by the DDR programme such as an information, counseling and referral service? Existing state structures? Other implementing partners? Why? \n What are the capacities of these potential implementing partners? \n Will the cost per participant be reasonable in comparison with other similar programmes? What about operational costs, will they be comparable with similar programmes? \n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -93252,7 +93252,7 @@ "Heading2": "7.1. Overview", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", + "Sentence": "\n How can resources be maximized through partnerships and linkages with other existing programmes?", "newParagraph": "planning phase reintegration programme based clear ass ments minimum ask following question nn key reintegration planning question assessment answer n reintegration approach combination approach suitable context question dual targeting excombatantled economic activity benefit also community n excombatants access areabased programme conflictaffected group would prevent programme track number excombatants participating level reintegration achieved n geographical coverage programme focus rural urban reintegration combination n narrow expansive eligibility criterion participate programme based excombatant returnee status vulnerability n type reintegration assistance offered ie economic social psychosocial andor political level intensity n strategy deployed match supply demand eg employabilityemployment creation psychosocial need traumapsychosocial counseling service etc n appropriate structure provide programme assistance dedicated structure created ddr programme information counseling referral service existing state structure implementing partner n capacity potential implementing partner n cost per participant reasonable comparison similar programme operational cost comparable similar programme n resource maximized partnership linkage existing programme", "ProcessedSent": "n resource maximized partnership linkage existing programme", "SentID": 5180 @@ -93925,7 +93925,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1602, - "Paragraph": "The most important types of ex-combatant focused assessments are: \\n 1. Early profiling and pre-registration surveys; \\n 2. Full profiling and registration of ex-combatants; \\n 3. Identification and assessment of areas of return and resettlement; \\n 4. Community perception surveys; \\n 5. Reintegration opportunity mapping; and \\n 6. Services mapping and institutional capacity assessment.", + "Paragraph": "The most important types of ex-combatant focused assessments are: \n 1. Early profiling and pre-registration surveys; \n 2. Full profiling and registration of ex-combatants; \n 3. Identification and assessment of areas of return and resettlement; \n 4. Community perception surveys; \n 5. Reintegration opportunity mapping; and \n 6. Services mapping and institutional capacity assessment.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -93936,14 +93936,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.5. Ex-combatant-focused reintegration assessments", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The most important types of ex-combatant focused assessments are: \\n 1.", + "Sentence": "The most important types of ex-combatant focused assessments are: \n 1.", "newParagraph": "important type excombatant focused assessment n 1 early profiling preregistration survey n 2 full profiling registration excombatants n 3 identification assessment area return resettlement n 4 community perception survey n 5 reintegration opportunity mapping n 6 service mapping institutional capacity assessment", "ProcessedSent": "important type excombatant focused assessment n 1", "SentID": 5218 }, { "ParagraphID": 1602, - "Paragraph": "The most important types of ex-combatant focused assessments are: \\n 1. Early profiling and pre-registration surveys; \\n 2. Full profiling and registration of ex-combatants; \\n 3. Identification and assessment of areas of return and resettlement; \\n 4. Community perception surveys; \\n 5. Reintegration opportunity mapping; and \\n 6. Services mapping and institutional capacity assessment.", + "Paragraph": "The most important types of ex-combatant focused assessments are: \n 1. Early profiling and pre-registration surveys; \n 2. Full profiling and registration of ex-combatants; \n 3. Identification and assessment of areas of return and resettlement; \n 4. Community perception surveys; \n 5. Reintegration opportunity mapping; and \n 6. Services mapping and institutional capacity assessment.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -93954,14 +93954,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.5. Ex-combatant-focused reintegration assessments", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Early profiling and pre-registration surveys; \\n 2.", + "Sentence": "Early profiling and pre-registration surveys; \n 2.", "newParagraph": "important type excombatant focused assessment n 1 early profiling preregistration survey n 2 full profiling registration excombatants n 3 identification assessment area return resettlement n 4 community perception survey n 5 reintegration opportunity mapping n 6 service mapping institutional capacity assessment", "ProcessedSent": "early profiling preregistration survey n 2", "SentID": 5219 }, { "ParagraphID": 1602, - "Paragraph": "The most important types of ex-combatant focused assessments are: \\n 1. Early profiling and pre-registration surveys; \\n 2. Full profiling and registration of ex-combatants; \\n 3. Identification and assessment of areas of return and resettlement; \\n 4. Community perception surveys; \\n 5. Reintegration opportunity mapping; and \\n 6. Services mapping and institutional capacity assessment.", + "Paragraph": "The most important types of ex-combatant focused assessments are: \n 1. Early profiling and pre-registration surveys; \n 2. Full profiling and registration of ex-combatants; \n 3. Identification and assessment of areas of return and resettlement; \n 4. Community perception surveys; \n 5. Reintegration opportunity mapping; and \n 6. Services mapping and institutional capacity assessment.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -93972,14 +93972,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.5. Ex-combatant-focused reintegration assessments", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Full profiling and registration of ex-combatants; \\n 3.", + "Sentence": "Full profiling and registration of ex-combatants; \n 3.", "newParagraph": "important type excombatant focused assessment n 1 early profiling preregistration survey n 2 full profiling registration excombatants n 3 identification assessment area return resettlement n 4 community perception survey n 5 reintegration opportunity mapping n 6 service mapping institutional capacity assessment", "ProcessedSent": "full profiling registration excombatants n 3", "SentID": 5220 }, { "ParagraphID": 1602, - "Paragraph": "The most important types of ex-combatant focused assessments are: \\n 1. Early profiling and pre-registration surveys; \\n 2. Full profiling and registration of ex-combatants; \\n 3. Identification and assessment of areas of return and resettlement; \\n 4. Community perception surveys; \\n 5. Reintegration opportunity mapping; and \\n 6. Services mapping and institutional capacity assessment.", + "Paragraph": "The most important types of ex-combatant focused assessments are: \n 1. Early profiling and pre-registration surveys; \n 2. Full profiling and registration of ex-combatants; \n 3. Identification and assessment of areas of return and resettlement; \n 4. Community perception surveys; \n 5. Reintegration opportunity mapping; and \n 6. Services mapping and institutional capacity assessment.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -93990,14 +93990,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.5. Ex-combatant-focused reintegration assessments", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Identification and assessment of areas of return and resettlement; \\n 4.", + "Sentence": "Identification and assessment of areas of return and resettlement; \n 4.", "newParagraph": "important type excombatant focused assessment n 1 early profiling preregistration survey n 2 full profiling registration excombatants n 3 identification assessment area return resettlement n 4 community perception survey n 5 reintegration opportunity mapping n 6 service mapping institutional capacity assessment", "ProcessedSent": "identification assessment area return resettlement n 4", "SentID": 5221 }, { "ParagraphID": 1602, - "Paragraph": "The most important types of ex-combatant focused assessments are: \\n 1. Early profiling and pre-registration surveys; \\n 2. Full profiling and registration of ex-combatants; \\n 3. Identification and assessment of areas of return and resettlement; \\n 4. Community perception surveys; \\n 5. Reintegration opportunity mapping; and \\n 6. Services mapping and institutional capacity assessment.", + "Paragraph": "The most important types of ex-combatant focused assessments are: \n 1. Early profiling and pre-registration surveys; \n 2. Full profiling and registration of ex-combatants; \n 3. Identification and assessment of areas of return and resettlement; \n 4. Community perception surveys; \n 5. Reintegration opportunity mapping; and \n 6. Services mapping and institutional capacity assessment.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -94008,14 +94008,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.5. Ex-combatant-focused reintegration assessments", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Community perception surveys; \\n 5.", + "Sentence": "Community perception surveys; \n 5.", "newParagraph": "important type excombatant focused assessment n 1 early profiling preregistration survey n 2 full profiling registration excombatants n 3 identification assessment area return resettlement n 4 community perception survey n 5 reintegration opportunity mapping n 6 service mapping institutional capacity assessment", "ProcessedSent": "community perception survey n 5", "SentID": 5222 }, { "ParagraphID": 1602, - "Paragraph": "The most important types of ex-combatant focused assessments are: \\n 1. Early profiling and pre-registration surveys; \\n 2. Full profiling and registration of ex-combatants; \\n 3. Identification and assessment of areas of return and resettlement; \\n 4. Community perception surveys; \\n 5. Reintegration opportunity mapping; and \\n 6. Services mapping and institutional capacity assessment.", + "Paragraph": "The most important types of ex-combatant focused assessments are: \n 1. Early profiling and pre-registration surveys; \n 2. Full profiling and registration of ex-combatants; \n 3. Identification and assessment of areas of return and resettlement; \n 4. Community perception surveys; \n 5. Reintegration opportunity mapping; and \n 6. Services mapping and institutional capacity assessment.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -94026,14 +94026,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.5. Ex-combatant-focused reintegration assessments", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Reintegration opportunity mapping; and \\n 6.", + "Sentence": "Reintegration opportunity mapping; and \n 6.", "newParagraph": "important type excombatant focused assessment n 1 early profiling preregistration survey n 2 full profiling registration excombatants n 3 identification assessment area return resettlement n 4 community perception survey n 5 reintegration opportunity mapping n 6 service mapping institutional capacity assessment", "ProcessedSent": "reintegration opportunity mapping n 6", "SentID": 5223 }, { "ParagraphID": 1602, - "Paragraph": "The most important types of ex-combatant focused assessments are: \\n 1. Early profiling and pre-registration surveys; \\n 2. Full profiling and registration of ex-combatants; \\n 3. Identification and assessment of areas of return and resettlement; \\n 4. Community perception surveys; \\n 5. Reintegration opportunity mapping; and \\n 6. Services mapping and institutional capacity assessment.", + "Paragraph": "The most important types of ex-combatant focused assessments are: \n 1. Early profiling and pre-registration surveys; \n 2. Full profiling and registration of ex-combatants; \n 3. Identification and assessment of areas of return and resettlement; \n 4. Community perception surveys; \n 5. Reintegration opportunity mapping; and \n 6. Services mapping and institutional capacity assessment.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -95401,7 +95401,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1629, - "Paragraph": "A participatory approach will significantly improve the DDR programme by: \\n providing a forum for testing ideas that could improve programme design; \\n enabling the development of strategies that respond to local realities and needs; \\n providing a sense of empowerment or agency; \\n providing a forum for impartial information in the case of disputes or misperceptions about the programme; \\n ensuring local ownership; \\n encouraging DDR and other local processes such as peace-building or recovery to work together and support each other; \\n encouraging communication and negotiation among the main actors to reduce levels of tension and fear and to enhance reconciliation and human security; \\n recognizing and supporting the capacity and voices of youth, women and persons (also see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR and IDDRS 5.20 on Youth and DDR); \\n recognizing new and evolving roles for women in society, especially in non-tradi- tional areas such as security-related matters (also see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR); \\n building respect for the rights of marginalized and specific needs groups (also see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR and 5.30 on Children and DDR); and \\n helping to ensure the sustainability of reintegration by developing community capac- ity to provide services and establishing community monitoring, management and oversight structures and systems.", + "Paragraph": "A participatory approach will significantly improve the DDR programme by: \n providing a forum for testing ideas that could improve programme design; \n enabling the development of strategies that respond to local realities and needs; \n providing a sense of empowerment or agency; \n providing a forum for impartial information in the case of disputes or misperceptions about the programme; \n ensuring local ownership; \n encouraging DDR and other local processes such as peace-building or recovery to work together and support each other; \n encouraging communication and negotiation among the main actors to reduce levels of tension and fear and to enhance reconciliation and human security; \n recognizing and supporting the capacity and voices of youth, women and persons (also see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR and IDDRS 5.20 on Youth and DDR); \n recognizing new and evolving roles for women in society, especially in non-tradi- tional areas such as security-related matters (also see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR); \n building respect for the rights of marginalized and specific needs groups (also see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR and 5.30 on Children and DDR); and \n helping to ensure the sustainability of reintegration by developing community capac- ity to provide services and establishing community monitoring, management and oversight structures and systems.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -95412,7 +95412,7 @@ "Heading2": "8.1. Reintegration Planning", "Heading3": "8.1.1. Participatory, inclusive and transparent planning", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "A participatory approach will significantly improve the DDR programme by: \\n providing a forum for testing ideas that could improve programme design; \\n enabling the development of strategies that respond to local realities and needs; \\n providing a sense of empowerment or agency; \\n providing a forum for impartial information in the case of disputes or misperceptions about the programme; \\n ensuring local ownership; \\n encouraging DDR and other local processes such as peace-building or recovery to work together and support each other; \\n encouraging communication and negotiation among the main actors to reduce levels of tension and fear and to enhance reconciliation and human security; \\n recognizing and supporting the capacity and voices of youth, women and persons (also see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR and IDDRS 5.20 on Youth and DDR); \\n recognizing new and evolving roles for women in society, especially in non-tradi- tional areas such as security-related matters (also see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR); \\n building respect for the rights of marginalized and specific needs groups (also see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR and 5.30 on Children and DDR); and \\n helping to ensure the sustainability of reintegration by developing community capac- ity to provide services and establishing community monitoring, management and oversight structures and systems.", + "Sentence": "A participatory approach will significantly improve the DDR programme by: \n providing a forum for testing ideas that could improve programme design; \n enabling the development of strategies that respond to local realities and needs; \n providing a sense of empowerment or agency; \n providing a forum for impartial information in the case of disputes or misperceptions about the programme; \n ensuring local ownership; \n encouraging DDR and other local processes such as peace-building or recovery to work together and support each other; \n encouraging communication and negotiation among the main actors to reduce levels of tension and fear and to enhance reconciliation and human security; \n recognizing and supporting the capacity and voices of youth, women and persons (also see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR and IDDRS 5.20 on Youth and DDR); \n recognizing new and evolving roles for women in society, especially in non-tradi- tional areas such as security-related matters (also see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR); \n building respect for the rights of marginalized and specific needs groups (also see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR and 5.30 on Children and DDR); and \n helping to ensure the sustainability of reintegration by developing community capac- ity to provide services and establishing community monitoring, management and oversight structures and systems.", "newParagraph": "participatory approach significantly improve ddr programme n providing forum testing idea could improve programme design n enabling development strategy respond local reality need n providing sense empowerment agency n providing forum impartial information case dispute misperceptions programme n ensuring local ownership n encouraging ddr local process peacebuilding recovery work together support n encouraging communication negotiation among main actor reduce level tension fear enhance reconciliation human security n recognizing supporting capacity voice youth woman person also see iddrs 510 woman gender ddr iddrs 520 youth ddr n recognizing new evolving role woman society especially nontradi tional area securityrelated matter also see iddrs 510 woman gender ddr n building respect right marginalized specific need group also see iddrs 510 woman gender ddr 530 child ddr n helping ensure sustainability reintegration developing community capac ity provide service establishing community monitoring management oversight structure system", "ProcessedSent": "participatory approach significantly improve ddr programme n providing forum testing idea could improve programme design n enabling development strategy respond local reality need n providing sense empowerment agency n providing forum impartial information case dispute misperceptions programme n ensuring local ownership n encouraging ddr local process peacebuilding recovery work together support n encouraging communication negotiation among main actor reduce level tension fear enhance reconciliation human security n recognizing supporting capacity voice youth woman person also see iddrs 510 woman gender ddr iddrs 520 youth ddr n recognizing new evolving role woman society especially nontradi tional area securityrelated matter also see iddrs 510 woman gender ddr n building respect right marginalized specific need group also see iddrs 510 woman gender ddr 530 child ddr n helping ensure sustainability reintegration developing community capac ity provide service establishing community monitoring management oversight structure system", "SentID": 5300 @@ -95761,7 +95761,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1636, - "Paragraph": "Private sector actors should be sensitized to DDR programme activities and con- sulted from the initial programme design stage so that the reintegration assistance can target actual needs in the labour market. A thorough understanding of the existing pri- vate sector and war economy is also necessary for reintegration planning. The following options can be considered to encourage private sector investment (see ILO Guidelines for the Socio-economic Reintegration of Ex-combatants, pp. 26-27): \\n Create incentives for private companies and employers\u2019 associations to help re-estab- lish small local units (e.g. sub-contracting) to supply services and provide employment. \\n Consider how short-term job creation for ex-combatants can be linked to the private sector. For example, provide private sector actors incentives in primary and second- ary infrastructure contracts, with contractual obligations to take on a fixed number of labourers and apprentices from ex-combatant groups. \\n Upgrade existing enterprises, transfer appropriate technology (especially to the urban informal economy), organize livelihoods and vocational training, and provide access to credit. \\n Stimulate public-private partnerships (PPPs) in areas most suitable to commu- nity reintegration (infrastructure, basic services) that promote social inclusion. \\n\\n Reintegration programmes can seek to facilitate linking the entities to make such partnerships possible.", + "Paragraph": "Private sector actors should be sensitized to DDR programme activities and con- sulted from the initial programme design stage so that the reintegration assistance can target actual needs in the labour market. A thorough understanding of the existing pri- vate sector and war economy is also necessary for reintegration planning. The following options can be considered to encourage private sector investment (see ILO Guidelines for the Socio-economic Reintegration of Ex-combatants, pp. 26-27): \n Create incentives for private companies and employers\u2019 associations to help re-estab- lish small local units (e.g. sub-contracting) to supply services and provide employment. \n Consider how short-term job creation for ex-combatants can be linked to the private sector. For example, provide private sector actors incentives in primary and second- ary infrastructure contracts, with contractual obligations to take on a fixed number of labourers and apprentices from ex-combatant groups. \n Upgrade existing enterprises, transfer appropriate technology (especially to the urban informal economy), organize livelihoods and vocational training, and provide access to credit. \n Stimulate public-private partnerships (PPPs) in areas most suitable to commu- nity reintegration (infrastructure, basic services) that promote social inclusion. \n\n Reintegration programmes can seek to facilitate linking the entities to make such partnerships possible.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -95779,7 +95779,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1636, - "Paragraph": "Private sector actors should be sensitized to DDR programme activities and con- sulted from the initial programme design stage so that the reintegration assistance can target actual needs in the labour market. A thorough understanding of the existing pri- vate sector and war economy is also necessary for reintegration planning. The following options can be considered to encourage private sector investment (see ILO Guidelines for the Socio-economic Reintegration of Ex-combatants, pp. 26-27): \\n Create incentives for private companies and employers\u2019 associations to help re-estab- lish small local units (e.g. sub-contracting) to supply services and provide employment. \\n Consider how short-term job creation for ex-combatants can be linked to the private sector. For example, provide private sector actors incentives in primary and second- ary infrastructure contracts, with contractual obligations to take on a fixed number of labourers and apprentices from ex-combatant groups. \\n Upgrade existing enterprises, transfer appropriate technology (especially to the urban informal economy), organize livelihoods and vocational training, and provide access to credit. \\n Stimulate public-private partnerships (PPPs) in areas most suitable to commu- nity reintegration (infrastructure, basic services) that promote social inclusion. \\n\\n Reintegration programmes can seek to facilitate linking the entities to make such partnerships possible.", + "Paragraph": "Private sector actors should be sensitized to DDR programme activities and con- sulted from the initial programme design stage so that the reintegration assistance can target actual needs in the labour market. A thorough understanding of the existing pri- vate sector and war economy is also necessary for reintegration planning. The following options can be considered to encourage private sector investment (see ILO Guidelines for the Socio-economic Reintegration of Ex-combatants, pp. 26-27): \n Create incentives for private companies and employers\u2019 associations to help re-estab- lish small local units (e.g. sub-contracting) to supply services and provide employment. \n Consider how short-term job creation for ex-combatants can be linked to the private sector. For example, provide private sector actors incentives in primary and second- ary infrastructure contracts, with contractual obligations to take on a fixed number of labourers and apprentices from ex-combatant groups. \n Upgrade existing enterprises, transfer appropriate technology (especially to the urban informal economy), organize livelihoods and vocational training, and provide access to credit. \n Stimulate public-private partnerships (PPPs) in areas most suitable to commu- nity reintegration (infrastructure, basic services) that promote social inclusion. \n\n Reintegration programmes can seek to facilitate linking the entities to make such partnerships possible.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -95797,7 +95797,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1636, - "Paragraph": "Private sector actors should be sensitized to DDR programme activities and con- sulted from the initial programme design stage so that the reintegration assistance can target actual needs in the labour market. A thorough understanding of the existing pri- vate sector and war economy is also necessary for reintegration planning. The following options can be considered to encourage private sector investment (see ILO Guidelines for the Socio-economic Reintegration of Ex-combatants, pp. 26-27): \\n Create incentives for private companies and employers\u2019 associations to help re-estab- lish small local units (e.g. sub-contracting) to supply services and provide employment. \\n Consider how short-term job creation for ex-combatants can be linked to the private sector. For example, provide private sector actors incentives in primary and second- ary infrastructure contracts, with contractual obligations to take on a fixed number of labourers and apprentices from ex-combatant groups. \\n Upgrade existing enterprises, transfer appropriate technology (especially to the urban informal economy), organize livelihoods and vocational training, and provide access to credit. \\n Stimulate public-private partnerships (PPPs) in areas most suitable to commu- nity reintegration (infrastructure, basic services) that promote social inclusion. \\n\\n Reintegration programmes can seek to facilitate linking the entities to make such partnerships possible.", + "Paragraph": "Private sector actors should be sensitized to DDR programme activities and con- sulted from the initial programme design stage so that the reintegration assistance can target actual needs in the labour market. A thorough understanding of the existing pri- vate sector and war economy is also necessary for reintegration planning. The following options can be considered to encourage private sector investment (see ILO Guidelines for the Socio-economic Reintegration of Ex-combatants, pp. 26-27): \n Create incentives for private companies and employers\u2019 associations to help re-estab- lish small local units (e.g. sub-contracting) to supply services and provide employment. \n Consider how short-term job creation for ex-combatants can be linked to the private sector. For example, provide private sector actors incentives in primary and second- ary infrastructure contracts, with contractual obligations to take on a fixed number of labourers and apprentices from ex-combatant groups. \n Upgrade existing enterprises, transfer appropriate technology (especially to the urban informal economy), organize livelihoods and vocational training, and provide access to credit. \n Stimulate public-private partnerships (PPPs) in areas most suitable to commu- nity reintegration (infrastructure, basic services) that promote social inclusion. \n\n Reintegration programmes can seek to facilitate linking the entities to make such partnerships possible.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -95815,7 +95815,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1636, - "Paragraph": "Private sector actors should be sensitized to DDR programme activities and con- sulted from the initial programme design stage so that the reintegration assistance can target actual needs in the labour market. A thorough understanding of the existing pri- vate sector and war economy is also necessary for reintegration planning. The following options can be considered to encourage private sector investment (see ILO Guidelines for the Socio-economic Reintegration of Ex-combatants, pp. 26-27): \\n Create incentives for private companies and employers\u2019 associations to help re-estab- lish small local units (e.g. sub-contracting) to supply services and provide employment. \\n Consider how short-term job creation for ex-combatants can be linked to the private sector. For example, provide private sector actors incentives in primary and second- ary infrastructure contracts, with contractual obligations to take on a fixed number of labourers and apprentices from ex-combatant groups. \\n Upgrade existing enterprises, transfer appropriate technology (especially to the urban informal economy), organize livelihoods and vocational training, and provide access to credit. \\n Stimulate public-private partnerships (PPPs) in areas most suitable to commu- nity reintegration (infrastructure, basic services) that promote social inclusion. \\n\\n Reintegration programmes can seek to facilitate linking the entities to make such partnerships possible.", + "Paragraph": "Private sector actors should be sensitized to DDR programme activities and con- sulted from the initial programme design stage so that the reintegration assistance can target actual needs in the labour market. A thorough understanding of the existing pri- vate sector and war economy is also necessary for reintegration planning. The following options can be considered to encourage private sector investment (see ILO Guidelines for the Socio-economic Reintegration of Ex-combatants, pp. 26-27): \n Create incentives for private companies and employers\u2019 associations to help re-estab- lish small local units (e.g. sub-contracting) to supply services and provide employment. \n Consider how short-term job creation for ex-combatants can be linked to the private sector. For example, provide private sector actors incentives in primary and second- ary infrastructure contracts, with contractual obligations to take on a fixed number of labourers and apprentices from ex-combatant groups. \n Upgrade existing enterprises, transfer appropriate technology (especially to the urban informal economy), organize livelihoods and vocational training, and provide access to credit. \n Stimulate public-private partnerships (PPPs) in areas most suitable to commu- nity reintegration (infrastructure, basic services) that promote social inclusion. \n\n Reintegration programmes can seek to facilitate linking the entities to make such partnerships possible.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -95826,14 +95826,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.1. Reintegration Planning", "Heading3": "8.1.4. Private sector involvement", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "26-27): \\n Create incentives for private companies and employers\u2019 associations to help re-estab- lish small local units (e.g.", + "Sentence": "26-27): \n Create incentives for private companies and employers\u2019 associations to help re-estab- lish small local units (e.g.", "newParagraph": "private sector actor sensitized ddr programme activity con sulted initial programme design stage reintegration assistance target actual need labour market thorough understanding existing pri vate sector war economy also necessary reintegration planning following option considered encourage private sector investment see ilo guideline socioeconomic reintegration excombatants pp 2627 n create incentive private company employer association help reestab lish small local unit eg subcontracting supply service provide employment n consider shortterm job creation excombatants linked private sector example provide private sector actor incentive primary second ary infrastructure contract contractual obligation take fixed number labourer apprentice excombatant group n upgrade existing enterprise transfer appropriate technology especially urban informal economy organize livelihood vocational training provide access credit n stimulate publicprivate partnership ppp area suitable commu nity reintegration infrastructure basic service promote social inclusion nn reintegration programme seek facilitate linking entity make partnership possible", "ProcessedSent": "2627 n create incentive private company employer association help reestab lish small local unit eg", "SentID": 5323 }, { "ParagraphID": 1636, - "Paragraph": "Private sector actors should be sensitized to DDR programme activities and con- sulted from the initial programme design stage so that the reintegration assistance can target actual needs in the labour market. A thorough understanding of the existing pri- vate sector and war economy is also necessary for reintegration planning. The following options can be considered to encourage private sector investment (see ILO Guidelines for the Socio-economic Reintegration of Ex-combatants, pp. 26-27): \\n Create incentives for private companies and employers\u2019 associations to help re-estab- lish small local units (e.g. sub-contracting) to supply services and provide employment. \\n Consider how short-term job creation for ex-combatants can be linked to the private sector. For example, provide private sector actors incentives in primary and second- ary infrastructure contracts, with contractual obligations to take on a fixed number of labourers and apprentices from ex-combatant groups. \\n Upgrade existing enterprises, transfer appropriate technology (especially to the urban informal economy), organize livelihoods and vocational training, and provide access to credit. \\n Stimulate public-private partnerships (PPPs) in areas most suitable to commu- nity reintegration (infrastructure, basic services) that promote social inclusion. \\n\\n Reintegration programmes can seek to facilitate linking the entities to make such partnerships possible.", + "Paragraph": "Private sector actors should be sensitized to DDR programme activities and con- sulted from the initial programme design stage so that the reintegration assistance can target actual needs in the labour market. A thorough understanding of the existing pri- vate sector and war economy is also necessary for reintegration planning. The following options can be considered to encourage private sector investment (see ILO Guidelines for the Socio-economic Reintegration of Ex-combatants, pp. 26-27): \n Create incentives for private companies and employers\u2019 associations to help re-estab- lish small local units (e.g. sub-contracting) to supply services and provide employment. \n Consider how short-term job creation for ex-combatants can be linked to the private sector. For example, provide private sector actors incentives in primary and second- ary infrastructure contracts, with contractual obligations to take on a fixed number of labourers and apprentices from ex-combatant groups. \n Upgrade existing enterprises, transfer appropriate technology (especially to the urban informal economy), organize livelihoods and vocational training, and provide access to credit. \n Stimulate public-private partnerships (PPPs) in areas most suitable to commu- nity reintegration (infrastructure, basic services) that promote social inclusion. \n\n Reintegration programmes can seek to facilitate linking the entities to make such partnerships possible.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -95851,7 +95851,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1636, - "Paragraph": "Private sector actors should be sensitized to DDR programme activities and con- sulted from the initial programme design stage so that the reintegration assistance can target actual needs in the labour market. A thorough understanding of the existing pri- vate sector and war economy is also necessary for reintegration planning. The following options can be considered to encourage private sector investment (see ILO Guidelines for the Socio-economic Reintegration of Ex-combatants, pp. 26-27): \\n Create incentives for private companies and employers\u2019 associations to help re-estab- lish small local units (e.g. sub-contracting) to supply services and provide employment. \\n Consider how short-term job creation for ex-combatants can be linked to the private sector. For example, provide private sector actors incentives in primary and second- ary infrastructure contracts, with contractual obligations to take on a fixed number of labourers and apprentices from ex-combatant groups. \\n Upgrade existing enterprises, transfer appropriate technology (especially to the urban informal economy), organize livelihoods and vocational training, and provide access to credit. \\n Stimulate public-private partnerships (PPPs) in areas most suitable to commu- nity reintegration (infrastructure, basic services) that promote social inclusion. \\n\\n Reintegration programmes can seek to facilitate linking the entities to make such partnerships possible.", + "Paragraph": "Private sector actors should be sensitized to DDR programme activities and con- sulted from the initial programme design stage so that the reintegration assistance can target actual needs in the labour market. A thorough understanding of the existing pri- vate sector and war economy is also necessary for reintegration planning. The following options can be considered to encourage private sector investment (see ILO Guidelines for the Socio-economic Reintegration of Ex-combatants, pp. 26-27): \n Create incentives for private companies and employers\u2019 associations to help re-estab- lish small local units (e.g. sub-contracting) to supply services and provide employment. \n Consider how short-term job creation for ex-combatants can be linked to the private sector. For example, provide private sector actors incentives in primary and second- ary infrastructure contracts, with contractual obligations to take on a fixed number of labourers and apprentices from ex-combatant groups. \n Upgrade existing enterprises, transfer appropriate technology (especially to the urban informal economy), organize livelihoods and vocational training, and provide access to credit. \n Stimulate public-private partnerships (PPPs) in areas most suitable to commu- nity reintegration (infrastructure, basic services) that promote social inclusion. \n\n Reintegration programmes can seek to facilitate linking the entities to make such partnerships possible.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -95862,14 +95862,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.1. Reintegration Planning", "Heading3": "8.1.4. Private sector involvement", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Consider how short-term job creation for ex-combatants can be linked to the private sector.", + "Sentence": "\n Consider how short-term job creation for ex-combatants can be linked to the private sector.", "newParagraph": "private sector actor sensitized ddr programme activity con sulted initial programme design stage reintegration assistance target actual need labour market thorough understanding existing pri vate sector war economy also necessary reintegration planning following option considered encourage private sector investment see ilo guideline socioeconomic reintegration excombatants pp 2627 n create incentive private company employer association help reestab lish small local unit eg subcontracting supply service provide employment n consider shortterm job creation excombatants linked private sector example provide private sector actor incentive primary second ary infrastructure contract contractual obligation take fixed number labourer apprentice excombatant group n upgrade existing enterprise transfer appropriate technology especially urban informal economy organize livelihood vocational training provide access credit n stimulate publicprivate partnership ppp area suitable commu nity reintegration infrastructure basic service promote social inclusion nn reintegration programme seek facilitate linking entity make partnership possible", "ProcessedSent": "n consider shortterm job creation excombatants linked private sector", "SentID": 5325 }, { "ParagraphID": 1636, - "Paragraph": "Private sector actors should be sensitized to DDR programme activities and con- sulted from the initial programme design stage so that the reintegration assistance can target actual needs in the labour market. A thorough understanding of the existing pri- vate sector and war economy is also necessary for reintegration planning. The following options can be considered to encourage private sector investment (see ILO Guidelines for the Socio-economic Reintegration of Ex-combatants, pp. 26-27): \\n Create incentives for private companies and employers\u2019 associations to help re-estab- lish small local units (e.g. sub-contracting) to supply services and provide employment. \\n Consider how short-term job creation for ex-combatants can be linked to the private sector. For example, provide private sector actors incentives in primary and second- ary infrastructure contracts, with contractual obligations to take on a fixed number of labourers and apprentices from ex-combatant groups. \\n Upgrade existing enterprises, transfer appropriate technology (especially to the urban informal economy), organize livelihoods and vocational training, and provide access to credit. \\n Stimulate public-private partnerships (PPPs) in areas most suitable to commu- nity reintegration (infrastructure, basic services) that promote social inclusion. \\n\\n Reintegration programmes can seek to facilitate linking the entities to make such partnerships possible.", + "Paragraph": "Private sector actors should be sensitized to DDR programme activities and con- sulted from the initial programme design stage so that the reintegration assistance can target actual needs in the labour market. A thorough understanding of the existing pri- vate sector and war economy is also necessary for reintegration planning. The following options can be considered to encourage private sector investment (see ILO Guidelines for the Socio-economic Reintegration of Ex-combatants, pp. 26-27): \n Create incentives for private companies and employers\u2019 associations to help re-estab- lish small local units (e.g. sub-contracting) to supply services and provide employment. \n Consider how short-term job creation for ex-combatants can be linked to the private sector. For example, provide private sector actors incentives in primary and second- ary infrastructure contracts, with contractual obligations to take on a fixed number of labourers and apprentices from ex-combatant groups. \n Upgrade existing enterprises, transfer appropriate technology (especially to the urban informal economy), organize livelihoods and vocational training, and provide access to credit. \n Stimulate public-private partnerships (PPPs) in areas most suitable to commu- nity reintegration (infrastructure, basic services) that promote social inclusion. \n\n Reintegration programmes can seek to facilitate linking the entities to make such partnerships possible.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -95887,7 +95887,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1636, - "Paragraph": "Private sector actors should be sensitized to DDR programme activities and con- sulted from the initial programme design stage so that the reintegration assistance can target actual needs in the labour market. A thorough understanding of the existing pri- vate sector and war economy is also necessary for reintegration planning. The following options can be considered to encourage private sector investment (see ILO Guidelines for the Socio-economic Reintegration of Ex-combatants, pp. 26-27): \\n Create incentives for private companies and employers\u2019 associations to help re-estab- lish small local units (e.g. sub-contracting) to supply services and provide employment. \\n Consider how short-term job creation for ex-combatants can be linked to the private sector. For example, provide private sector actors incentives in primary and second- ary infrastructure contracts, with contractual obligations to take on a fixed number of labourers and apprentices from ex-combatant groups. \\n Upgrade existing enterprises, transfer appropriate technology (especially to the urban informal economy), organize livelihoods and vocational training, and provide access to credit. \\n Stimulate public-private partnerships (PPPs) in areas most suitable to commu- nity reintegration (infrastructure, basic services) that promote social inclusion. \\n\\n Reintegration programmes can seek to facilitate linking the entities to make such partnerships possible.", + "Paragraph": "Private sector actors should be sensitized to DDR programme activities and con- sulted from the initial programme design stage so that the reintegration assistance can target actual needs in the labour market. A thorough understanding of the existing pri- vate sector and war economy is also necessary for reintegration planning. The following options can be considered to encourage private sector investment (see ILO Guidelines for the Socio-economic Reintegration of Ex-combatants, pp. 26-27): \n Create incentives for private companies and employers\u2019 associations to help re-estab- lish small local units (e.g. sub-contracting) to supply services and provide employment. \n Consider how short-term job creation for ex-combatants can be linked to the private sector. For example, provide private sector actors incentives in primary and second- ary infrastructure contracts, with contractual obligations to take on a fixed number of labourers and apprentices from ex-combatant groups. \n Upgrade existing enterprises, transfer appropriate technology (especially to the urban informal economy), organize livelihoods and vocational training, and provide access to credit. \n Stimulate public-private partnerships (PPPs) in areas most suitable to commu- nity reintegration (infrastructure, basic services) that promote social inclusion. \n\n Reintegration programmes can seek to facilitate linking the entities to make such partnerships possible.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -95898,14 +95898,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.1. Reintegration Planning", "Heading3": "8.1.4. Private sector involvement", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Upgrade existing enterprises, transfer appropriate technology (especially to the urban informal economy), organize livelihoods and vocational training, and provide access to credit.", + "Sentence": "\n Upgrade existing enterprises, transfer appropriate technology (especially to the urban informal economy), organize livelihoods and vocational training, and provide access to credit.", "newParagraph": "private sector actor sensitized ddr programme activity con sulted initial programme design stage reintegration assistance target actual need labour market thorough understanding existing pri vate sector war economy also necessary reintegration planning following option considered encourage private sector investment see ilo guideline socioeconomic reintegration excombatants pp 2627 n create incentive private company employer association help reestab lish small local unit eg subcontracting supply service provide employment n consider shortterm job creation excombatants linked private sector example provide private sector actor incentive primary second ary infrastructure contract contractual obligation take fixed number labourer apprentice excombatant group n upgrade existing enterprise transfer appropriate technology especially urban informal economy organize livelihood vocational training provide access credit n stimulate publicprivate partnership ppp area suitable commu nity reintegration infrastructure basic service promote social inclusion nn reintegration programme seek facilitate linking entity make partnership possible", "ProcessedSent": "n upgrade existing enterprise transfer appropriate technology especially urban informal economy organize livelihood vocational training provide access credit", "SentID": 5327 }, { "ParagraphID": 1636, - "Paragraph": "Private sector actors should be sensitized to DDR programme activities and con- sulted from the initial programme design stage so that the reintegration assistance can target actual needs in the labour market. A thorough understanding of the existing pri- vate sector and war economy is also necessary for reintegration planning. The following options can be considered to encourage private sector investment (see ILO Guidelines for the Socio-economic Reintegration of Ex-combatants, pp. 26-27): \\n Create incentives for private companies and employers\u2019 associations to help re-estab- lish small local units (e.g. sub-contracting) to supply services and provide employment. \\n Consider how short-term job creation for ex-combatants can be linked to the private sector. For example, provide private sector actors incentives in primary and second- ary infrastructure contracts, with contractual obligations to take on a fixed number of labourers and apprentices from ex-combatant groups. \\n Upgrade existing enterprises, transfer appropriate technology (especially to the urban informal economy), organize livelihoods and vocational training, and provide access to credit. \\n Stimulate public-private partnerships (PPPs) in areas most suitable to commu- nity reintegration (infrastructure, basic services) that promote social inclusion. \\n\\n Reintegration programmes can seek to facilitate linking the entities to make such partnerships possible.", + "Paragraph": "Private sector actors should be sensitized to DDR programme activities and con- sulted from the initial programme design stage so that the reintegration assistance can target actual needs in the labour market. A thorough understanding of the existing pri- vate sector and war economy is also necessary for reintegration planning. The following options can be considered to encourage private sector investment (see ILO Guidelines for the Socio-economic Reintegration of Ex-combatants, pp. 26-27): \n Create incentives for private companies and employers\u2019 associations to help re-estab- lish small local units (e.g. sub-contracting) to supply services and provide employment. \n Consider how short-term job creation for ex-combatants can be linked to the private sector. For example, provide private sector actors incentives in primary and second- ary infrastructure contracts, with contractual obligations to take on a fixed number of labourers and apprentices from ex-combatant groups. \n Upgrade existing enterprises, transfer appropriate technology (especially to the urban informal economy), organize livelihoods and vocational training, and provide access to credit. \n Stimulate public-private partnerships (PPPs) in areas most suitable to commu- nity reintegration (infrastructure, basic services) that promote social inclusion. \n\n Reintegration programmes can seek to facilitate linking the entities to make such partnerships possible.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -95916,14 +95916,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.1. Reintegration Planning", "Heading3": "8.1.4. Private sector involvement", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Stimulate public-private partnerships (PPPs) in areas most suitable to commu- nity reintegration (infrastructure, basic services) that promote social inclusion.", + "Sentence": "\n Stimulate public-private partnerships (PPPs) in areas most suitable to commu- nity reintegration (infrastructure, basic services) that promote social inclusion.", "newParagraph": "private sector actor sensitized ddr programme activity con sulted initial programme design stage reintegration assistance target actual need labour market thorough understanding existing pri vate sector war economy also necessary reintegration planning following option considered encourage private sector investment see ilo guideline socioeconomic reintegration excombatants pp 2627 n create incentive private company employer association help reestab lish small local unit eg subcontracting supply service provide employment n consider shortterm job creation excombatants linked private sector example provide private sector actor incentive primary second ary infrastructure contract contractual obligation take fixed number labourer apprentice excombatant group n upgrade existing enterprise transfer appropriate technology especially urban informal economy organize livelihood vocational training provide access credit n stimulate publicprivate partnership ppp area suitable commu nity reintegration infrastructure basic service promote social inclusion nn reintegration programme seek facilitate linking entity make partnership possible", "ProcessedSent": "n stimulate publicprivate partnership ppp area suitable commu nity reintegration infrastructure basic service promote social inclusion", "SentID": 5328 }, { "ParagraphID": 1636, - "Paragraph": "Private sector actors should be sensitized to DDR programme activities and con- sulted from the initial programme design stage so that the reintegration assistance can target actual needs in the labour market. A thorough understanding of the existing pri- vate sector and war economy is also necessary for reintegration planning. The following options can be considered to encourage private sector investment (see ILO Guidelines for the Socio-economic Reintegration of Ex-combatants, pp. 26-27): \\n Create incentives for private companies and employers\u2019 associations to help re-estab- lish small local units (e.g. sub-contracting) to supply services and provide employment. \\n Consider how short-term job creation for ex-combatants can be linked to the private sector. For example, provide private sector actors incentives in primary and second- ary infrastructure contracts, with contractual obligations to take on a fixed number of labourers and apprentices from ex-combatant groups. \\n Upgrade existing enterprises, transfer appropriate technology (especially to the urban informal economy), organize livelihoods and vocational training, and provide access to credit. \\n Stimulate public-private partnerships (PPPs) in areas most suitable to commu- nity reintegration (infrastructure, basic services) that promote social inclusion. \\n\\n Reintegration programmes can seek to facilitate linking the entities to make such partnerships possible.", + "Paragraph": "Private sector actors should be sensitized to DDR programme activities and con- sulted from the initial programme design stage so that the reintegration assistance can target actual needs in the labour market. A thorough understanding of the existing pri- vate sector and war economy is also necessary for reintegration planning. The following options can be considered to encourage private sector investment (see ILO Guidelines for the Socio-economic Reintegration of Ex-combatants, pp. 26-27): \n Create incentives for private companies and employers\u2019 associations to help re-estab- lish small local units (e.g. sub-contracting) to supply services and provide employment. \n Consider how short-term job creation for ex-combatants can be linked to the private sector. For example, provide private sector actors incentives in primary and second- ary infrastructure contracts, with contractual obligations to take on a fixed number of labourers and apprentices from ex-combatant groups. \n Upgrade existing enterprises, transfer appropriate technology (especially to the urban informal economy), organize livelihoods and vocational training, and provide access to credit. \n Stimulate public-private partnerships (PPPs) in areas most suitable to commu- nity reintegration (infrastructure, basic services) that promote social inclusion. \n\n Reintegration programmes can seek to facilitate linking the entities to make such partnerships possible.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -95934,7 +95934,7 @@ "Heading2": "8.1. Reintegration Planning", "Heading3": "8.1.4. Private sector involvement", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Reintegration programmes can seek to facilitate linking the entities to make such partnerships possible.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Reintegration programmes can seek to facilitate linking the entities to make such partnerships possible.", "newParagraph": "private sector actor sensitized ddr programme activity con sulted initial programme design stage reintegration assistance target actual need labour market thorough understanding existing pri vate sector war economy also necessary reintegration planning following option considered encourage private sector investment see ilo guideline socioeconomic reintegration excombatants pp 2627 n create incentive private company employer association help reestab lish small local unit eg subcontracting supply service provide employment n consider shortterm job creation excombatants linked private sector example provide private sector actor incentive primary second ary infrastructure contract contractual obligation take fixed number labourer apprentice excombatant group n upgrade existing enterprise transfer appropriate technology especially urban informal economy organize livelihood vocational training provide access credit n stimulate publicprivate partnership ppp area suitable commu nity reintegration infrastructure basic service promote social inclusion nn reintegration programme seek facilitate linking entity make partnership possible", "ProcessedSent": "nn reintegration programme seek facilitate linking entity make partnership possible", "SentID": 5329 @@ -96121,7 +96121,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1640, - "Paragraph": "A well-designed DDR programme shall not only enhance basic security but shall also sup- port wider recovery and development efforts. It shall further define strategies to address the following essential elements for progamme success: \\n Reintegration strategy and exit strategy; \\n Eligibility criteria; \\n Public information and sensitization; \\n Information counseling and referral services (ICRS); \\n Monitoring and evaluation (M&E); \\n Capacity development; \\n Resource mobilization.", + "Paragraph": "A well-designed DDR programme shall not only enhance basic security but shall also sup- port wider recovery and development efforts. It shall further define strategies to address the following essential elements for progamme success: \n Reintegration strategy and exit strategy; \n Eligibility criteria; \n Public information and sensitization; \n Information counseling and referral services (ICRS); \n Monitoring and evaluation (M&E); \n Capacity development; \n Resource mobilization.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -96139,7 +96139,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1640, - "Paragraph": "A well-designed DDR programme shall not only enhance basic security but shall also sup- port wider recovery and development efforts. It shall further define strategies to address the following essential elements for progamme success: \\n Reintegration strategy and exit strategy; \\n Eligibility criteria; \\n Public information and sensitization; \\n Information counseling and referral services (ICRS); \\n Monitoring and evaluation (M&E); \\n Capacity development; \\n Resource mobilization.", + "Paragraph": "A well-designed DDR programme shall not only enhance basic security but shall also sup- port wider recovery and development efforts. It shall further define strategies to address the following essential elements for progamme success: \n Reintegration strategy and exit strategy; \n Eligibility criteria; \n Public information and sensitization; \n Information counseling and referral services (ICRS); \n Monitoring and evaluation (M&E); \n Capacity development; \n Resource mobilization.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -96150,7 +96150,7 @@ "Heading2": "8.2. Reintegration design", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "It shall further define strategies to address the following essential elements for progamme success: \\n Reintegration strategy and exit strategy; \\n Eligibility criteria; \\n Public information and sensitization; \\n Information counseling and referral services (ICRS); \\n Monitoring and evaluation (M&E); \\n Capacity development; \\n Resource mobilization.", + "Sentence": "It shall further define strategies to address the following essential elements for progamme success: \n Reintegration strategy and exit strategy; \n Eligibility criteria; \n Public information and sensitization; \n Information counseling and referral services (ICRS); \n Monitoring and evaluation (M&E); \n Capacity development; \n Resource mobilization.", "newParagraph": "welldesigned ddr programme shall enhance basic security shall also sup port wider recovery development effort shall define strategy address following essential element progamme success n reintegration strategy exit strategy n eligibility criterion n public information sensitization n information counseling referral service icrs n monitoring evaluation n capacity development n resource mobilization", "ProcessedSent": "shall define strategy address following essential element progamme success n reintegration strategy exit strategy n eligibility criterion n public information sensitization n information counseling referral service icrs n monitoring evaluation n capacity development n resource mobilization", "SentID": 5341 @@ -96733,7 +96733,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1653, - "Paragraph": "The programme budget required for M&E will largely depend on the following factors: \\n The number of dedicated M&E staff the programme hires and at what level; \\n The number of planned external evaluations; \\n The number and type of surveys and other primary data collection activities; \\n The costs associated with training; \\n The costs of establishing baselines.", + "Paragraph": "The programme budget required for M&E will largely depend on the following factors: \n The number of dedicated M&E staff the programme hires and at what level; \n The number of planned external evaluations; \n The number and type of surveys and other primary data collection activities; \n The costs associated with training; \n The costs of establishing baselines.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -96744,7 +96744,7 @@ "Heading2": "8.2. Reintegration design", "Heading3": "8.2.5. Monitoring and evaluation (M&E)", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The programme budget required for M&E will largely depend on the following factors: \\n The number of dedicated M&E staff the programme hires and at what level; \\n The number of planned external evaluations; \\n The number and type of surveys and other primary data collection activities; \\n The costs associated with training; \\n The costs of establishing baselines.", + "Sentence": "The programme budget required for M&E will largely depend on the following factors: \n The number of dedicated M&E staff the programme hires and at what level; \n The number of planned external evaluations; \n The number and type of surveys and other primary data collection activities; \n The costs associated with training; \n The costs of establishing baselines.", "newParagraph": "programme budget required largely depend following factor n number dedicated staff programme hire level n number planned external evaluation n number type survey primary data collection activity n cost associated training n cost establishing baseline", "ProcessedSent": "programme budget required largely depend following factor n number dedicated staff programme hire level n number planned external evaluation n number type survey primary data collection activity n cost associated training n cost establishing baseline", "SentID": 5374 @@ -97579,7 +97579,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1668, - "Paragraph": "These tracks are: \\n Track A, focused on stabilizing income generation and creating emergency employ- ment and targeting specific conflict-affected individuals, including ex-combatants; \\n Track B, focused on local economic recovery (LER) for employment and reintegration, including in communities ex-combatants and displaced persons chose to return to; and \\n Track C, focused on sustainable employment creation and decent work.", + "Paragraph": "These tracks are: \n Track A, focused on stabilizing income generation and creating emergency employ- ment and targeting specific conflict-affected individuals, including ex-combatants; \n Track B, focused on local economic recovery (LER) for employment and reintegration, including in communities ex-combatants and displaced persons chose to return to; and \n Track C, focused on sustainable employment creation and decent work.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -97590,7 +97590,7 @@ "Heading2": "9.1. United Nations Policy for Post-Conflict Employment Creation, Income Generation and Reintegration", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "These tracks are: \\n Track A, focused on stabilizing income generation and creating emergency employ- ment and targeting specific conflict-affected individuals, including ex-combatants; \\n Track B, focused on local economic recovery (LER) for employment and reintegration, including in communities ex-combatants and displaced persons chose to return to; and \\n Track C, focused on sustainable employment creation and decent work.", + "Sentence": "These tracks are: \n Track A, focused on stabilizing income generation and creating emergency employ- ment and targeting specific conflict-affected individuals, including ex-combatants; \n Track B, focused on local economic recovery (LER) for employment and reintegration, including in communities ex-combatants and displaced persons chose to return to; and \n Track C, focused on sustainable employment creation and decent work.", "newParagraph": "track n track focused stabilizing income generation creating emergency employ ment targeting specific conflictaffected individual including excombatants n track b focused local economic recovery ler employment reintegration including community excombatants displaced person chose return n track c focused sustainable employment creation decent work", "ProcessedSent": "track n track focused stabilizing income generation creating emergency employ ment targeting specific conflictaffected individual including excombatants n track b focused local economic recovery ler employment reintegration including community excombatants displaced person chose return n track c focused sustainable employment creation decent work", "SentID": 5421 @@ -99019,7 +99019,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1696, - "Paragraph": "A national enabling environment for job creation and decent work is essential as con- sensus-building and policy development take time. Enabling policies and programmes therefore need to be initiated early and supported by DDR planners. The ILO Guidelines for the Socio-Economic Reintegration of Ex-Combatants identify the following key factors for creating such an environment at the policy level:3 \\n Strongly considering policy choices that ensure that infrastructure production and maintenance rely on local labour, local technical capacity and local materials to the greatest extent possible. \\n Supporting national policies for labour-intensive work that are especially suitable for employing large numbers of ex-combatants. \\n Reviewing and supporting national policies and legislation to create an enabling environment for private sector and small and medium enterprise (SME) development in rural and urban areas. This should include incentives for local companies to hire high-risk groups, often linked to reconstruction and rehabilitation. It should also consider the role of the private sector in supporting conflict-sensitive business devel- opment and in aiding in the transition from a war to peace economy. \\n Recognizing potential limitations within the post-conflict context when supporting particular national policies. \\n Identifying priority economic sectors with potential of rapid expansion and job creation.", + "Paragraph": "A national enabling environment for job creation and decent work is essential as con- sensus-building and policy development take time. Enabling policies and programmes therefore need to be initiated early and supported by DDR planners. The ILO Guidelines for the Socio-Economic Reintegration of Ex-Combatants identify the following key factors for creating such an environment at the policy level:3 \n Strongly considering policy choices that ensure that infrastructure production and maintenance rely on local labour, local technical capacity and local materials to the greatest extent possible. \n Supporting national policies for labour-intensive work that are especially suitable for employing large numbers of ex-combatants. \n Reviewing and supporting national policies and legislation to create an enabling environment for private sector and small and medium enterprise (SME) development in rural and urban areas. This should include incentives for local companies to hire high-risk groups, often linked to reconstruction and rehabilitation. It should also consider the role of the private sector in supporting conflict-sensitive business devel- opment and in aiding in the transition from a war to peace economy. \n Recognizing potential limitations within the post-conflict context when supporting particular national policies. \n Identifying priority economic sectors with potential of rapid expansion and job creation.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -99037,7 +99037,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1696, - "Paragraph": "A national enabling environment for job creation and decent work is essential as con- sensus-building and policy development take time. Enabling policies and programmes therefore need to be initiated early and supported by DDR planners. The ILO Guidelines for the Socio-Economic Reintegration of Ex-Combatants identify the following key factors for creating such an environment at the policy level:3 \\n Strongly considering policy choices that ensure that infrastructure production and maintenance rely on local labour, local technical capacity and local materials to the greatest extent possible. \\n Supporting national policies for labour-intensive work that are especially suitable for employing large numbers of ex-combatants. \\n Reviewing and supporting national policies and legislation to create an enabling environment for private sector and small and medium enterprise (SME) development in rural and urban areas. This should include incentives for local companies to hire high-risk groups, often linked to reconstruction and rehabilitation. It should also consider the role of the private sector in supporting conflict-sensitive business devel- opment and in aiding in the transition from a war to peace economy. \\n Recognizing potential limitations within the post-conflict context when supporting particular national policies. \\n Identifying priority economic sectors with potential of rapid expansion and job creation.", + "Paragraph": "A national enabling environment for job creation and decent work is essential as con- sensus-building and policy development take time. Enabling policies and programmes therefore need to be initiated early and supported by DDR planners. The ILO Guidelines for the Socio-Economic Reintegration of Ex-Combatants identify the following key factors for creating such an environment at the policy level:3 \n Strongly considering policy choices that ensure that infrastructure production and maintenance rely on local labour, local technical capacity and local materials to the greatest extent possible. \n Supporting national policies for labour-intensive work that are especially suitable for employing large numbers of ex-combatants. \n Reviewing and supporting national policies and legislation to create an enabling environment for private sector and small and medium enterprise (SME) development in rural and urban areas. This should include incentives for local companies to hire high-risk groups, often linked to reconstruction and rehabilitation. It should also consider the role of the private sector in supporting conflict-sensitive business devel- opment and in aiding in the transition from a war to peace economy. \n Recognizing potential limitations within the post-conflict context when supporting particular national policies. \n Identifying priority economic sectors with potential of rapid expansion and job creation.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -99055,7 +99055,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1696, - "Paragraph": "A national enabling environment for job creation and decent work is essential as con- sensus-building and policy development take time. Enabling policies and programmes therefore need to be initiated early and supported by DDR planners. The ILO Guidelines for the Socio-Economic Reintegration of Ex-Combatants identify the following key factors for creating such an environment at the policy level:3 \\n Strongly considering policy choices that ensure that infrastructure production and maintenance rely on local labour, local technical capacity and local materials to the greatest extent possible. \\n Supporting national policies for labour-intensive work that are especially suitable for employing large numbers of ex-combatants. \\n Reviewing and supporting national policies and legislation to create an enabling environment for private sector and small and medium enterprise (SME) development in rural and urban areas. This should include incentives for local companies to hire high-risk groups, often linked to reconstruction and rehabilitation. It should also consider the role of the private sector in supporting conflict-sensitive business devel- opment and in aiding in the transition from a war to peace economy. \\n Recognizing potential limitations within the post-conflict context when supporting particular national policies. \\n Identifying priority economic sectors with potential of rapid expansion and job creation.", + "Paragraph": "A national enabling environment for job creation and decent work is essential as con- sensus-building and policy development take time. Enabling policies and programmes therefore need to be initiated early and supported by DDR planners. The ILO Guidelines for the Socio-Economic Reintegration of Ex-Combatants identify the following key factors for creating such an environment at the policy level:3 \n Strongly considering policy choices that ensure that infrastructure production and maintenance rely on local labour, local technical capacity and local materials to the greatest extent possible. \n Supporting national policies for labour-intensive work that are especially suitable for employing large numbers of ex-combatants. \n Reviewing and supporting national policies and legislation to create an enabling environment for private sector and small and medium enterprise (SME) development in rural and urban areas. This should include incentives for local companies to hire high-risk groups, often linked to reconstruction and rehabilitation. It should also consider the role of the private sector in supporting conflict-sensitive business devel- opment and in aiding in the transition from a war to peace economy. \n Recognizing potential limitations within the post-conflict context when supporting particular national policies. \n Identifying priority economic sectors with potential of rapid expansion and job creation.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -99066,14 +99066,14 @@ "Heading2": "9.4. Income generating opportunities", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The ILO Guidelines for the Socio-Economic Reintegration of Ex-Combatants identify the following key factors for creating such an environment at the policy level:3 \\n Strongly considering policy choices that ensure that infrastructure production and maintenance rely on local labour, local technical capacity and local materials to the greatest extent possible.", + "Sentence": "The ILO Guidelines for the Socio-Economic Reintegration of Ex-Combatants identify the following key factors for creating such an environment at the policy level:3 \n Strongly considering policy choices that ensure that infrastructure production and maintenance rely on local labour, local technical capacity and local materials to the greatest extent possible.", "newParagraph": "national enabling environment job creation decent work essential con sensusbuilding policy development take time enabling policy programme therefore need initiated early supported ddr planner ilo guideline socioeconomic reintegration excombatants identify following key factor creating environment policy level3 n strongly considering policy choice ensure infrastructure production maintenance rely local labour local technical capacity local material greatest extent possible n supporting national policy labourintensive work especially suitable employing large number excombatants n reviewing supporting national policy legislation create enabling environment private sector small medium enterprise sme development rural urban area include incentive local company hire highrisk group often linked reconstruction rehabilitation also consider role private sector supporting conflictsensitive business devel opment aiding transition war peace economy n recognizing potential limitation within postconflict context supporting particular national policy n identifying priority economic sector potential rapid expansion job creation", "ProcessedSent": "ilo guideline socioeconomic reintegration excombatants identify following key factor creating environment policy level3 n strongly considering policy choice ensure infrastructure production maintenance rely local labour local technical capacity local material greatest extent possible", "SentID": 5503 }, { "ParagraphID": 1696, - "Paragraph": "A national enabling environment for job creation and decent work is essential as con- sensus-building and policy development take time. Enabling policies and programmes therefore need to be initiated early and supported by DDR planners. The ILO Guidelines for the Socio-Economic Reintegration of Ex-Combatants identify the following key factors for creating such an environment at the policy level:3 \\n Strongly considering policy choices that ensure that infrastructure production and maintenance rely on local labour, local technical capacity and local materials to the greatest extent possible. \\n Supporting national policies for labour-intensive work that are especially suitable for employing large numbers of ex-combatants. \\n Reviewing and supporting national policies and legislation to create an enabling environment for private sector and small and medium enterprise (SME) development in rural and urban areas. This should include incentives for local companies to hire high-risk groups, often linked to reconstruction and rehabilitation. It should also consider the role of the private sector in supporting conflict-sensitive business devel- opment and in aiding in the transition from a war to peace economy. \\n Recognizing potential limitations within the post-conflict context when supporting particular national policies. \\n Identifying priority economic sectors with potential of rapid expansion and job creation.", + "Paragraph": "A national enabling environment for job creation and decent work is essential as con- sensus-building and policy development take time. Enabling policies and programmes therefore need to be initiated early and supported by DDR planners. The ILO Guidelines for the Socio-Economic Reintegration of Ex-Combatants identify the following key factors for creating such an environment at the policy level:3 \n Strongly considering policy choices that ensure that infrastructure production and maintenance rely on local labour, local technical capacity and local materials to the greatest extent possible. \n Supporting national policies for labour-intensive work that are especially suitable for employing large numbers of ex-combatants. \n Reviewing and supporting national policies and legislation to create an enabling environment for private sector and small and medium enterprise (SME) development in rural and urban areas. This should include incentives for local companies to hire high-risk groups, often linked to reconstruction and rehabilitation. It should also consider the role of the private sector in supporting conflict-sensitive business devel- opment and in aiding in the transition from a war to peace economy. \n Recognizing potential limitations within the post-conflict context when supporting particular national policies. \n Identifying priority economic sectors with potential of rapid expansion and job creation.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -99084,14 +99084,14 @@ "Heading2": "9.4. Income generating opportunities", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Supporting national policies for labour-intensive work that are especially suitable for employing large numbers of ex-combatants.", + "Sentence": "\n Supporting national policies for labour-intensive work that are especially suitable for employing large numbers of ex-combatants.", "newParagraph": "national enabling environment job creation decent work essential con sensusbuilding policy development take time enabling policy programme therefore need initiated early supported ddr planner ilo guideline socioeconomic reintegration excombatants identify following key factor creating environment policy level3 n strongly considering policy choice ensure infrastructure production maintenance rely local labour local technical capacity local material greatest extent possible n supporting national policy labourintensive work especially suitable employing large number excombatants n reviewing supporting national policy legislation create enabling environment private sector small medium enterprise sme development rural urban area include incentive local company hire highrisk group often linked reconstruction rehabilitation also consider role private sector supporting conflictsensitive business devel opment aiding transition war peace economy n recognizing potential limitation within postconflict context supporting particular national policy n identifying priority economic sector potential rapid expansion job creation", "ProcessedSent": "n supporting national policy labourintensive work especially suitable employing large number excombatants", "SentID": 5504 }, { "ParagraphID": 1696, - "Paragraph": "A national enabling environment for job creation and decent work is essential as con- sensus-building and policy development take time. Enabling policies and programmes therefore need to be initiated early and supported by DDR planners. The ILO Guidelines for the Socio-Economic Reintegration of Ex-Combatants identify the following key factors for creating such an environment at the policy level:3 \\n Strongly considering policy choices that ensure that infrastructure production and maintenance rely on local labour, local technical capacity and local materials to the greatest extent possible. \\n Supporting national policies for labour-intensive work that are especially suitable for employing large numbers of ex-combatants. \\n Reviewing and supporting national policies and legislation to create an enabling environment for private sector and small and medium enterprise (SME) development in rural and urban areas. This should include incentives for local companies to hire high-risk groups, often linked to reconstruction and rehabilitation. It should also consider the role of the private sector in supporting conflict-sensitive business devel- opment and in aiding in the transition from a war to peace economy. \\n Recognizing potential limitations within the post-conflict context when supporting particular national policies. \\n Identifying priority economic sectors with potential of rapid expansion and job creation.", + "Paragraph": "A national enabling environment for job creation and decent work is essential as con- sensus-building and policy development take time. Enabling policies and programmes therefore need to be initiated early and supported by DDR planners. The ILO Guidelines for the Socio-Economic Reintegration of Ex-Combatants identify the following key factors for creating such an environment at the policy level:3 \n Strongly considering policy choices that ensure that infrastructure production and maintenance rely on local labour, local technical capacity and local materials to the greatest extent possible. \n Supporting national policies for labour-intensive work that are especially suitable for employing large numbers of ex-combatants. \n Reviewing and supporting national policies and legislation to create an enabling environment for private sector and small and medium enterprise (SME) development in rural and urban areas. This should include incentives for local companies to hire high-risk groups, often linked to reconstruction and rehabilitation. It should also consider the role of the private sector in supporting conflict-sensitive business devel- opment and in aiding in the transition from a war to peace economy. \n Recognizing potential limitations within the post-conflict context when supporting particular national policies. \n Identifying priority economic sectors with potential of rapid expansion and job creation.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -99102,14 +99102,14 @@ "Heading2": "9.4. Income generating opportunities", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Reviewing and supporting national policies and legislation to create an enabling environment for private sector and small and medium enterprise (SME) development in rural and urban areas.", + "Sentence": "\n Reviewing and supporting national policies and legislation to create an enabling environment for private sector and small and medium enterprise (SME) development in rural and urban areas.", "newParagraph": "national enabling environment job creation decent work essential con sensusbuilding policy development take time enabling policy programme therefore need initiated early supported ddr planner ilo guideline socioeconomic reintegration excombatants identify following key factor creating environment policy level3 n strongly considering policy choice ensure infrastructure production maintenance rely local labour local technical capacity local material greatest extent possible n supporting national policy labourintensive work especially suitable employing large number excombatants n reviewing supporting national policy legislation create enabling environment private sector small medium enterprise sme development rural urban area include incentive local company hire highrisk group often linked reconstruction rehabilitation also consider role private sector supporting conflictsensitive business devel opment aiding transition war peace economy n recognizing potential limitation within postconflict context supporting particular national policy n identifying priority economic sector potential rapid expansion job creation", "ProcessedSent": "n reviewing supporting national policy legislation create enabling environment private sector small medium enterprise sme development rural urban area", "SentID": 5505 }, { "ParagraphID": 1696, - "Paragraph": "A national enabling environment for job creation and decent work is essential as con- sensus-building and policy development take time. Enabling policies and programmes therefore need to be initiated early and supported by DDR planners. The ILO Guidelines for the Socio-Economic Reintegration of Ex-Combatants identify the following key factors for creating such an environment at the policy level:3 \\n Strongly considering policy choices that ensure that infrastructure production and maintenance rely on local labour, local technical capacity and local materials to the greatest extent possible. \\n Supporting national policies for labour-intensive work that are especially suitable for employing large numbers of ex-combatants. \\n Reviewing and supporting national policies and legislation to create an enabling environment for private sector and small and medium enterprise (SME) development in rural and urban areas. This should include incentives for local companies to hire high-risk groups, often linked to reconstruction and rehabilitation. It should also consider the role of the private sector in supporting conflict-sensitive business devel- opment and in aiding in the transition from a war to peace economy. \\n Recognizing potential limitations within the post-conflict context when supporting particular national policies. \\n Identifying priority economic sectors with potential of rapid expansion and job creation.", + "Paragraph": "A national enabling environment for job creation and decent work is essential as con- sensus-building and policy development take time. Enabling policies and programmes therefore need to be initiated early and supported by DDR planners. The ILO Guidelines for the Socio-Economic Reintegration of Ex-Combatants identify the following key factors for creating such an environment at the policy level:3 \n Strongly considering policy choices that ensure that infrastructure production and maintenance rely on local labour, local technical capacity and local materials to the greatest extent possible. \n Supporting national policies for labour-intensive work that are especially suitable for employing large numbers of ex-combatants. \n Reviewing and supporting national policies and legislation to create an enabling environment for private sector and small and medium enterprise (SME) development in rural and urban areas. This should include incentives for local companies to hire high-risk groups, often linked to reconstruction and rehabilitation. It should also consider the role of the private sector in supporting conflict-sensitive business devel- opment and in aiding in the transition from a war to peace economy. \n Recognizing potential limitations within the post-conflict context when supporting particular national policies. \n Identifying priority economic sectors with potential of rapid expansion and job creation.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -99127,7 +99127,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1696, - "Paragraph": "A national enabling environment for job creation and decent work is essential as con- sensus-building and policy development take time. Enabling policies and programmes therefore need to be initiated early and supported by DDR planners. The ILO Guidelines for the Socio-Economic Reintegration of Ex-Combatants identify the following key factors for creating such an environment at the policy level:3 \\n Strongly considering policy choices that ensure that infrastructure production and maintenance rely on local labour, local technical capacity and local materials to the greatest extent possible. \\n Supporting national policies for labour-intensive work that are especially suitable for employing large numbers of ex-combatants. \\n Reviewing and supporting national policies and legislation to create an enabling environment for private sector and small and medium enterprise (SME) development in rural and urban areas. This should include incentives for local companies to hire high-risk groups, often linked to reconstruction and rehabilitation. It should also consider the role of the private sector in supporting conflict-sensitive business devel- opment and in aiding in the transition from a war to peace economy. \\n Recognizing potential limitations within the post-conflict context when supporting particular national policies. \\n Identifying priority economic sectors with potential of rapid expansion and job creation.", + "Paragraph": "A national enabling environment for job creation and decent work is essential as con- sensus-building and policy development take time. Enabling policies and programmes therefore need to be initiated early and supported by DDR planners. The ILO Guidelines for the Socio-Economic Reintegration of Ex-Combatants identify the following key factors for creating such an environment at the policy level:3 \n Strongly considering policy choices that ensure that infrastructure production and maintenance rely on local labour, local technical capacity and local materials to the greatest extent possible. \n Supporting national policies for labour-intensive work that are especially suitable for employing large numbers of ex-combatants. \n Reviewing and supporting national policies and legislation to create an enabling environment for private sector and small and medium enterprise (SME) development in rural and urban areas. This should include incentives for local companies to hire high-risk groups, often linked to reconstruction and rehabilitation. It should also consider the role of the private sector in supporting conflict-sensitive business devel- opment and in aiding in the transition from a war to peace economy. \n Recognizing potential limitations within the post-conflict context when supporting particular national policies. \n Identifying priority economic sectors with potential of rapid expansion and job creation.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -99145,7 +99145,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1696, - "Paragraph": "A national enabling environment for job creation and decent work is essential as con- sensus-building and policy development take time. Enabling policies and programmes therefore need to be initiated early and supported by DDR planners. The ILO Guidelines for the Socio-Economic Reintegration of Ex-Combatants identify the following key factors for creating such an environment at the policy level:3 \\n Strongly considering policy choices that ensure that infrastructure production and maintenance rely on local labour, local technical capacity and local materials to the greatest extent possible. \\n Supporting national policies for labour-intensive work that are especially suitable for employing large numbers of ex-combatants. \\n Reviewing and supporting national policies and legislation to create an enabling environment for private sector and small and medium enterprise (SME) development in rural and urban areas. This should include incentives for local companies to hire high-risk groups, often linked to reconstruction and rehabilitation. It should also consider the role of the private sector in supporting conflict-sensitive business devel- opment and in aiding in the transition from a war to peace economy. \\n Recognizing potential limitations within the post-conflict context when supporting particular national policies. \\n Identifying priority economic sectors with potential of rapid expansion and job creation.", + "Paragraph": "A national enabling environment for job creation and decent work is essential as con- sensus-building and policy development take time. Enabling policies and programmes therefore need to be initiated early and supported by DDR planners. The ILO Guidelines for the Socio-Economic Reintegration of Ex-Combatants identify the following key factors for creating such an environment at the policy level:3 \n Strongly considering policy choices that ensure that infrastructure production and maintenance rely on local labour, local technical capacity and local materials to the greatest extent possible. \n Supporting national policies for labour-intensive work that are especially suitable for employing large numbers of ex-combatants. \n Reviewing and supporting national policies and legislation to create an enabling environment for private sector and small and medium enterprise (SME) development in rural and urban areas. This should include incentives for local companies to hire high-risk groups, often linked to reconstruction and rehabilitation. It should also consider the role of the private sector in supporting conflict-sensitive business devel- opment and in aiding in the transition from a war to peace economy. \n Recognizing potential limitations within the post-conflict context when supporting particular national policies. \n Identifying priority economic sectors with potential of rapid expansion and job creation.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -99156,14 +99156,14 @@ "Heading2": "9.4. Income generating opportunities", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Recognizing potential limitations within the post-conflict context when supporting particular national policies.", + "Sentence": "\n Recognizing potential limitations within the post-conflict context when supporting particular national policies.", "newParagraph": "national enabling environment job creation decent work essential con sensusbuilding policy development take time enabling policy programme therefore need initiated early supported ddr planner ilo guideline socioeconomic reintegration excombatants identify following key factor creating environment policy level3 n strongly considering policy choice ensure infrastructure production maintenance rely local labour local technical capacity local material greatest extent possible n supporting national policy labourintensive work especially suitable employing large number excombatants n reviewing supporting national policy legislation create enabling environment private sector small medium enterprise sme development rural urban area include incentive local company hire highrisk group often linked reconstruction rehabilitation also consider role private sector supporting conflictsensitive business devel opment aiding transition war peace economy n recognizing potential limitation within postconflict context supporting particular national policy n identifying priority economic sector potential rapid expansion job creation", "ProcessedSent": "n recognizing potential limitation within postconflict context supporting particular national policy", "SentID": 5508 }, { "ParagraphID": 1696, - "Paragraph": "A national enabling environment for job creation and decent work is essential as con- sensus-building and policy development take time. Enabling policies and programmes therefore need to be initiated early and supported by DDR planners. The ILO Guidelines for the Socio-Economic Reintegration of Ex-Combatants identify the following key factors for creating such an environment at the policy level:3 \\n Strongly considering policy choices that ensure that infrastructure production and maintenance rely on local labour, local technical capacity and local materials to the greatest extent possible. \\n Supporting national policies for labour-intensive work that are especially suitable for employing large numbers of ex-combatants. \\n Reviewing and supporting national policies and legislation to create an enabling environment for private sector and small and medium enterprise (SME) development in rural and urban areas. This should include incentives for local companies to hire high-risk groups, often linked to reconstruction and rehabilitation. It should also consider the role of the private sector in supporting conflict-sensitive business devel- opment and in aiding in the transition from a war to peace economy. \\n Recognizing potential limitations within the post-conflict context when supporting particular national policies. \\n Identifying priority economic sectors with potential of rapid expansion and job creation.", + "Paragraph": "A national enabling environment for job creation and decent work is essential as con- sensus-building and policy development take time. Enabling policies and programmes therefore need to be initiated early and supported by DDR planners. The ILO Guidelines for the Socio-Economic Reintegration of Ex-Combatants identify the following key factors for creating such an environment at the policy level:3 \n Strongly considering policy choices that ensure that infrastructure production and maintenance rely on local labour, local technical capacity and local materials to the greatest extent possible. \n Supporting national policies for labour-intensive work that are especially suitable for employing large numbers of ex-combatants. \n Reviewing and supporting national policies and legislation to create an enabling environment for private sector and small and medium enterprise (SME) development in rural and urban areas. This should include incentives for local companies to hire high-risk groups, often linked to reconstruction and rehabilitation. It should also consider the role of the private sector in supporting conflict-sensitive business devel- opment and in aiding in the transition from a war to peace economy. \n Recognizing potential limitations within the post-conflict context when supporting particular national policies. \n Identifying priority economic sectors with potential of rapid expansion and job creation.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -99174,7 +99174,7 @@ "Heading2": "9.4. Income generating opportunities", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Identifying priority economic sectors with potential of rapid expansion and job creation.", + "Sentence": "\n Identifying priority economic sectors with potential of rapid expansion and job creation.", "newParagraph": "national enabling environment job creation decent work essential con sensusbuilding policy development take time enabling policy programme therefore need initiated early supported ddr planner ilo guideline socioeconomic reintegration excombatants identify following key factor creating environment policy level3 n strongly considering policy choice ensure infrastructure production maintenance rely local labour local technical capacity local material greatest extent possible n supporting national policy labourintensive work especially suitable employing large number excombatants n reviewing supporting national policy legislation create enabling environment private sector small medium enterprise sme development rural urban area include incentive local company hire highrisk group often linked reconstruction rehabilitation also consider role private sector supporting conflictsensitive business devel opment aiding transition war peace economy n recognizing potential limitation within postconflict context supporting particular national policy n identifying priority economic sector potential rapid expansion job creation", "ProcessedSent": "n identifying priority economic sector potential rapid expansion job creation", "SentID": 5509 @@ -99217,7 +99217,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1698, - "Paragraph": "Reintegration programmes should ideally aim to place qualified ex-combatants in existing businesses. Nonetheless, this is often difficult since business owners may not be willing (i.e. due to negative perceptions of ex-combatants) or able (i.e. du to stark economic real- ities) to employ them. Reintegration programmes should therefore help to increase the opportunities available to ex-combatants by offering wage, training and equipment subsi- dies. These subsidies, however, should have the following conditions: \\n Wage subsidies should be partial and last for a fixed period of time; \\n In-kind donations of equipment or training to allow for the expansion of existing businesses should be explored in exchange for the employment of reintegration pro- gramme beneficiaries; \\n Newly hired ex-combatants should not take the jobs of workers who are already employed; \\n Employers should use the subsidies to expand their businesses and to provide long- term employment for ex-combatants.", + "Paragraph": "Reintegration programmes should ideally aim to place qualified ex-combatants in existing businesses. Nonetheless, this is often difficult since business owners may not be willing (i.e. due to negative perceptions of ex-combatants) or able (i.e. du to stark economic real- ities) to employ them. Reintegration programmes should therefore help to increase the opportunities available to ex-combatants by offering wage, training and equipment subsi- dies. These subsidies, however, should have the following conditions: \n Wage subsidies should be partial and last for a fixed period of time; \n In-kind donations of equipment or training to allow for the expansion of existing businesses should be explored in exchange for the employment of reintegration pro- gramme beneficiaries; \n Newly hired ex-combatants should not take the jobs of workers who are already employed; \n Employers should use the subsidies to expand their businesses and to provide long- term employment for ex-combatants.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -99235,7 +99235,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1698, - "Paragraph": "Reintegration programmes should ideally aim to place qualified ex-combatants in existing businesses. Nonetheless, this is often difficult since business owners may not be willing (i.e. due to negative perceptions of ex-combatants) or able (i.e. du to stark economic real- ities) to employ them. Reintegration programmes should therefore help to increase the opportunities available to ex-combatants by offering wage, training and equipment subsi- dies. These subsidies, however, should have the following conditions: \\n Wage subsidies should be partial and last for a fixed period of time; \\n In-kind donations of equipment or training to allow for the expansion of existing businesses should be explored in exchange for the employment of reintegration pro- gramme beneficiaries; \\n Newly hired ex-combatants should not take the jobs of workers who are already employed; \\n Employers should use the subsidies to expand their businesses and to provide long- term employment for ex-combatants.", + "Paragraph": "Reintegration programmes should ideally aim to place qualified ex-combatants in existing businesses. Nonetheless, this is often difficult since business owners may not be willing (i.e. due to negative perceptions of ex-combatants) or able (i.e. du to stark economic real- ities) to employ them. Reintegration programmes should therefore help to increase the opportunities available to ex-combatants by offering wage, training and equipment subsi- dies. These subsidies, however, should have the following conditions: \n Wage subsidies should be partial and last for a fixed period of time; \n In-kind donations of equipment or training to allow for the expansion of existing businesses should be explored in exchange for the employment of reintegration pro- gramme beneficiaries; \n Newly hired ex-combatants should not take the jobs of workers who are already employed; \n Employers should use the subsidies to expand their businesses and to provide long- term employment for ex-combatants.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -99253,7 +99253,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1698, - "Paragraph": "Reintegration programmes should ideally aim to place qualified ex-combatants in existing businesses. Nonetheless, this is often difficult since business owners may not be willing (i.e. due to negative perceptions of ex-combatants) or able (i.e. du to stark economic real- ities) to employ them. Reintegration programmes should therefore help to increase the opportunities available to ex-combatants by offering wage, training and equipment subsi- dies. These subsidies, however, should have the following conditions: \\n Wage subsidies should be partial and last for a fixed period of time; \\n In-kind donations of equipment or training to allow for the expansion of existing businesses should be explored in exchange for the employment of reintegration pro- gramme beneficiaries; \\n Newly hired ex-combatants should not take the jobs of workers who are already employed; \\n Employers should use the subsidies to expand their businesses and to provide long- term employment for ex-combatants.", + "Paragraph": "Reintegration programmes should ideally aim to place qualified ex-combatants in existing businesses. Nonetheless, this is often difficult since business owners may not be willing (i.e. due to negative perceptions of ex-combatants) or able (i.e. du to stark economic real- ities) to employ them. Reintegration programmes should therefore help to increase the opportunities available to ex-combatants by offering wage, training and equipment subsi- dies. These subsidies, however, should have the following conditions: \n Wage subsidies should be partial and last for a fixed period of time; \n In-kind donations of equipment or training to allow for the expansion of existing businesses should be explored in exchange for the employment of reintegration pro- gramme beneficiaries; \n Newly hired ex-combatants should not take the jobs of workers who are already employed; \n Employers should use the subsidies to expand their businesses and to provide long- term employment for ex-combatants.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -99271,7 +99271,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1698, - "Paragraph": "Reintegration programmes should ideally aim to place qualified ex-combatants in existing businesses. Nonetheless, this is often difficult since business owners may not be willing (i.e. due to negative perceptions of ex-combatants) or able (i.e. du to stark economic real- ities) to employ them. Reintegration programmes should therefore help to increase the opportunities available to ex-combatants by offering wage, training and equipment subsi- dies. These subsidies, however, should have the following conditions: \\n Wage subsidies should be partial and last for a fixed period of time; \\n In-kind donations of equipment or training to allow for the expansion of existing businesses should be explored in exchange for the employment of reintegration pro- gramme beneficiaries; \\n Newly hired ex-combatants should not take the jobs of workers who are already employed; \\n Employers should use the subsidies to expand their businesses and to provide long- term employment for ex-combatants.", + "Paragraph": "Reintegration programmes should ideally aim to place qualified ex-combatants in existing businesses. Nonetheless, this is often difficult since business owners may not be willing (i.e. due to negative perceptions of ex-combatants) or able (i.e. du to stark economic real- ities) to employ them. Reintegration programmes should therefore help to increase the opportunities available to ex-combatants by offering wage, training and equipment subsi- dies. These subsidies, however, should have the following conditions: \n Wage subsidies should be partial and last for a fixed period of time; \n In-kind donations of equipment or training to allow for the expansion of existing businesses should be explored in exchange for the employment of reintegration pro- gramme beneficiaries; \n Newly hired ex-combatants should not take the jobs of workers who are already employed; \n Employers should use the subsidies to expand their businesses and to provide long- term employment for ex-combatants.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -99289,7 +99289,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1698, - "Paragraph": "Reintegration programmes should ideally aim to place qualified ex-combatants in existing businesses. Nonetheless, this is often difficult since business owners may not be willing (i.e. due to negative perceptions of ex-combatants) or able (i.e. du to stark economic real- ities) to employ them. Reintegration programmes should therefore help to increase the opportunities available to ex-combatants by offering wage, training and equipment subsi- dies. These subsidies, however, should have the following conditions: \\n Wage subsidies should be partial and last for a fixed period of time; \\n In-kind donations of equipment or training to allow for the expansion of existing businesses should be explored in exchange for the employment of reintegration pro- gramme beneficiaries; \\n Newly hired ex-combatants should not take the jobs of workers who are already employed; \\n Employers should use the subsidies to expand their businesses and to provide long- term employment for ex-combatants.", + "Paragraph": "Reintegration programmes should ideally aim to place qualified ex-combatants in existing businesses. Nonetheless, this is often difficult since business owners may not be willing (i.e. due to negative perceptions of ex-combatants) or able (i.e. du to stark economic real- ities) to employ them. Reintegration programmes should therefore help to increase the opportunities available to ex-combatants by offering wage, training and equipment subsi- dies. These subsidies, however, should have the following conditions: \n Wage subsidies should be partial and last for a fixed period of time; \n In-kind donations of equipment or training to allow for the expansion of existing businesses should be explored in exchange for the employment of reintegration pro- gramme beneficiaries; \n Newly hired ex-combatants should not take the jobs of workers who are already employed; \n Employers should use the subsidies to expand their businesses and to provide long- term employment for ex-combatants.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -99307,7 +99307,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1698, - "Paragraph": "Reintegration programmes should ideally aim to place qualified ex-combatants in existing businesses. Nonetheless, this is often difficult since business owners may not be willing (i.e. due to negative perceptions of ex-combatants) or able (i.e. du to stark economic real- ities) to employ them. Reintegration programmes should therefore help to increase the opportunities available to ex-combatants by offering wage, training and equipment subsi- dies. These subsidies, however, should have the following conditions: \\n Wage subsidies should be partial and last for a fixed period of time; \\n In-kind donations of equipment or training to allow for the expansion of existing businesses should be explored in exchange for the employment of reintegration pro- gramme beneficiaries; \\n Newly hired ex-combatants should not take the jobs of workers who are already employed; \\n Employers should use the subsidies to expand their businesses and to provide long- term employment for ex-combatants.", + "Paragraph": "Reintegration programmes should ideally aim to place qualified ex-combatants in existing businesses. Nonetheless, this is often difficult since business owners may not be willing (i.e. due to negative perceptions of ex-combatants) or able (i.e. du to stark economic real- ities) to employ them. Reintegration programmes should therefore help to increase the opportunities available to ex-combatants by offering wage, training and equipment subsi- dies. These subsidies, however, should have the following conditions: \n Wage subsidies should be partial and last for a fixed period of time; \n In-kind donations of equipment or training to allow for the expansion of existing businesses should be explored in exchange for the employment of reintegration pro- gramme beneficiaries; \n Newly hired ex-combatants should not take the jobs of workers who are already employed; \n Employers should use the subsidies to expand their businesses and to provide long- term employment for ex-combatants.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -99318,7 +99318,7 @@ "Heading2": "9.4. Income generating opportunities", "Heading3": "9.4.1. Private sector employment", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "These subsidies, however, should have the following conditions: \\n Wage subsidies should be partial and last for a fixed period of time; \\n In-kind donations of equipment or training to allow for the expansion of existing businesses should be explored in exchange for the employment of reintegration pro- gramme beneficiaries; \\n Newly hired ex-combatants should not take the jobs of workers who are already employed; \\n Employers should use the subsidies to expand their businesses and to provide long- term employment for ex-combatants.", + "Sentence": "These subsidies, however, should have the following conditions: \n Wage subsidies should be partial and last for a fixed period of time; \n In-kind donations of equipment or training to allow for the expansion of existing businesses should be explored in exchange for the employment of reintegration pro- gramme beneficiaries; \n Newly hired ex-combatants should not take the jobs of workers who are already employed; \n Employers should use the subsidies to expand their businesses and to provide long- term employment for ex-combatants.", "newParagraph": "reintegration programme ideally aim place qualified excombatants existing business nonetheless often difficult since business owner may willing ie due negative perception excombatants able ie du stark economic real ities employ reintegration programme therefore help increase opportunity available excombatants offering wage training equipment subsi dy subsidy however following condition n wage subsidy partial last fixed period time n inkind donation equipment training allow expansion existing business explored exchange employment reintegration pro gramme beneficiary n newly hired excombatants take job worker already employed n employer use subsidy expand business provide long term employment excombatants", "ProcessedSent": "subsidy however following condition n wage subsidy partial last fixed period time n inkind donation equipment training allow expansion existing business explored exchange employment reintegration pro gramme beneficiary n newly hired excombatants take job worker already employed n employer use subsidy expand business provide long term employment excombatants", "SentID": 5517 @@ -103411,7 +103411,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1768, - "Paragraph": "Generally, political reintegration occurs along two broad trajectories, namely at the group level and the individual level, as follows: \\n Group level: At the group level, political reintegration is transformative in that it seeks to aid in transforming a group or organization from an illegally armed entity into a legit- imate political party or civilian unit operating within the legal parameters of the state. \\n Individual level: At the individual level, political reintegration is restorative in that it involves restoring an ex-combatant\u2019s (and other programme participants\u2019) deci- sion-making power within a given community in relation to his\/her citizen status within that community.", + "Paragraph": "Generally, political reintegration occurs along two broad trajectories, namely at the group level and the individual level, as follows: \n Group level: At the group level, political reintegration is transformative in that it seeks to aid in transforming a group or organization from an illegally armed entity into a legit- imate political party or civilian unit operating within the legal parameters of the state. \n Individual level: At the individual level, political reintegration is restorative in that it involves restoring an ex-combatant\u2019s (and other programme participants\u2019) deci- sion-making power within a given community in relation to his\/her citizen status within that community.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -103422,14 +103422,14 @@ "Heading2": "11.1. Types of political reintegration", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Generally, political reintegration occurs along two broad trajectories, namely at the group level and the individual level, as follows: \\n Group level: At the group level, political reintegration is transformative in that it seeks to aid in transforming a group or organization from an illegally armed entity into a legit- imate political party or civilian unit operating within the legal parameters of the state.", + "Sentence": "Generally, political reintegration occurs along two broad trajectories, namely at the group level and the individual level, as follows: \n Group level: At the group level, political reintegration is transformative in that it seeks to aid in transforming a group or organization from an illegally armed entity into a legit- imate political party or civilian unit operating within the legal parameters of the state.", "newParagraph": "generally political reintegration occurs along two broad trajectory namely group level individual level follows n group level group level political reintegration transformative seek aid transforming group organization illegally armed entity legit imate political party civilian unit operating within legal parameter state n individual level individual level political reintegration restorative involves restoring excombatant programme participant deci sionmaking power within given community relation hisher citizen status within community", "ProcessedSent": "generally political reintegration occurs along two broad trajectory namely group level individual level follows n group level group level political reintegration transformative seek aid transforming group organization illegally armed entity legit imate political party civilian unit operating within legal parameter state", "SentID": 5745 }, { "ParagraphID": 1768, - "Paragraph": "Generally, political reintegration occurs along two broad trajectories, namely at the group level and the individual level, as follows: \\n Group level: At the group level, political reintegration is transformative in that it seeks to aid in transforming a group or organization from an illegally armed entity into a legit- imate political party or civilian unit operating within the legal parameters of the state. \\n Individual level: At the individual level, political reintegration is restorative in that it involves restoring an ex-combatant\u2019s (and other programme participants\u2019) deci- sion-making power within a given community in relation to his\/her citizen status within that community.", + "Paragraph": "Generally, political reintegration occurs along two broad trajectories, namely at the group level and the individual level, as follows: \n Group level: At the group level, political reintegration is transformative in that it seeks to aid in transforming a group or organization from an illegally armed entity into a legit- imate political party or civilian unit operating within the legal parameters of the state. \n Individual level: At the individual level, political reintegration is restorative in that it involves restoring an ex-combatant\u2019s (and other programme participants\u2019) deci- sion-making power within a given community in relation to his\/her citizen status within that community.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -103440,7 +103440,7 @@ "Heading2": "11.1. Types of political reintegration", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Individual level: At the individual level, political reintegration is restorative in that it involves restoring an ex-combatant\u2019s (and other programme participants\u2019) deci- sion-making power within a given community in relation to his\/her citizen status within that community.", + "Sentence": "\n Individual level: At the individual level, political reintegration is restorative in that it involves restoring an ex-combatant\u2019s (and other programme participants\u2019) deci- sion-making power within a given community in relation to his\/her citizen status within that community.", "newParagraph": "generally political reintegration occurs along two broad trajectory namely group level individual level follows n group level group level political reintegration transformative seek aid transforming group organization illegally armed entity legit imate political party civilian unit operating within legal parameter state n individual level individual level political reintegration restorative involves restoring excombatant programme participant deci sionmaking power within given community relation hisher citizen status within community", "ProcessedSent": "n individual level individual level political reintegration restorative involves restoring excombatant programme participant deci sionmaking power within given community relation hisher citizen status within community", "SentID": 5746 @@ -103537,7 +103537,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1771, - "Paragraph": "Given such complexities, when planning and designing political reintegration interventions, DDR practitioners must consider the following key factors influencing the viability and outcome of group level political transformations of armed forces and groups: \\n Nature of the peace (e.g. negotiated peace agreement, military victory, etc.); \\n Post-conflict security situation; \\n Motivation(s) of armed group (keeping in mind that such motivations can change over time); \\n Degree of popular support and perceived legitimacy; \\n Degree of political experience and capacity; \\n Leadership capacities; \\n Organizational structure; \\n Resources, funding and technical support; \\n Criminal prosecutions and transitional justice measures.", + "Paragraph": "Given such complexities, when planning and designing political reintegration interventions, DDR practitioners must consider the following key factors influencing the viability and outcome of group level political transformations of armed forces and groups: \n Nature of the peace (e.g. negotiated peace agreement, military victory, etc.); \n Post-conflict security situation; \n Motivation(s) of armed group (keeping in mind that such motivations can change over time); \n Degree of popular support and perceived legitimacy; \n Degree of political experience and capacity; \n Leadership capacities; \n Organizational structure; \n Resources, funding and technical support; \n Criminal prosecutions and transitional justice measures.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -103548,14 +103548,14 @@ "Heading2": "11.1. Types of political reintegration", "Heading3": "11.1.1. Group level political reintegration", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Given such complexities, when planning and designing political reintegration interventions, DDR practitioners must consider the following key factors influencing the viability and outcome of group level political transformations of armed forces and groups: \\n Nature of the peace (e.g.", + "Sentence": "Given such complexities, when planning and designing political reintegration interventions, DDR practitioners must consider the following key factors influencing the viability and outcome of group level political transformations of armed forces and groups: \n Nature of the peace (e.g.", "newParagraph": "given complexity planning designing political reintegration intervention ddr practitioner must consider following key factor influencing viability outcome group level political transformation armed force group n nature peace eg negotiated peace agreement military victory etc n postconflict security situation n motivation armed group keeping mind motivation change time n degree popular support perceived legitimacy n degree political experience capacity n leadership capacity n organizational structure n resource funding technical support n criminal prosecution transitional justice measure", "ProcessedSent": "given complexity planning designing political reintegration intervention ddr practitioner must consider following key factor influencing viability outcome group level political transformation armed force group n nature peace eg", "SentID": 5752 }, { "ParagraphID": 1771, - "Paragraph": "Given such complexities, when planning and designing political reintegration interventions, DDR practitioners must consider the following key factors influencing the viability and outcome of group level political transformations of armed forces and groups: \\n Nature of the peace (e.g. negotiated peace agreement, military victory, etc.); \\n Post-conflict security situation; \\n Motivation(s) of armed group (keeping in mind that such motivations can change over time); \\n Degree of popular support and perceived legitimacy; \\n Degree of political experience and capacity; \\n Leadership capacities; \\n Organizational structure; \\n Resources, funding and technical support; \\n Criminal prosecutions and transitional justice measures.", + "Paragraph": "Given such complexities, when planning and designing political reintegration interventions, DDR practitioners must consider the following key factors influencing the viability and outcome of group level political transformations of armed forces and groups: \n Nature of the peace (e.g. negotiated peace agreement, military victory, etc.); \n Post-conflict security situation; \n Motivation(s) of armed group (keeping in mind that such motivations can change over time); \n Degree of popular support and perceived legitimacy; \n Degree of political experience and capacity; \n Leadership capacities; \n Organizational structure; \n Resources, funding and technical support; \n Criminal prosecutions and transitional justice measures.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -103573,7 +103573,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1771, - "Paragraph": "Given such complexities, when planning and designing political reintegration interventions, DDR practitioners must consider the following key factors influencing the viability and outcome of group level political transformations of armed forces and groups: \\n Nature of the peace (e.g. negotiated peace agreement, military victory, etc.); \\n Post-conflict security situation; \\n Motivation(s) of armed group (keeping in mind that such motivations can change over time); \\n Degree of popular support and perceived legitimacy; \\n Degree of political experience and capacity; \\n Leadership capacities; \\n Organizational structure; \\n Resources, funding and technical support; \\n Criminal prosecutions and transitional justice measures.", + "Paragraph": "Given such complexities, when planning and designing political reintegration interventions, DDR practitioners must consider the following key factors influencing the viability and outcome of group level political transformations of armed forces and groups: \n Nature of the peace (e.g. negotiated peace agreement, military victory, etc.); \n Post-conflict security situation; \n Motivation(s) of armed group (keeping in mind that such motivations can change over time); \n Degree of popular support and perceived legitimacy; \n Degree of political experience and capacity; \n Leadership capacities; \n Organizational structure; \n Resources, funding and technical support; \n Criminal prosecutions and transitional justice measures.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -103584,7 +103584,7 @@ "Heading2": "11.1. Types of political reintegration", "Heading3": "11.1.1. Group level political reintegration", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "); \\n Post-conflict security situation; \\n Motivation(s) of armed group (keeping in mind that such motivations can change over time); \\n Degree of popular support and perceived legitimacy; \\n Degree of political experience and capacity; \\n Leadership capacities; \\n Organizational structure; \\n Resources, funding and technical support; \\n Criminal prosecutions and transitional justice measures.", + "Sentence": "); \n Post-conflict security situation; \n Motivation(s) of armed group (keeping in mind that such motivations can change over time); \n Degree of popular support and perceived legitimacy; \n Degree of political experience and capacity; \n Leadership capacities; \n Organizational structure; \n Resources, funding and technical support; \n Criminal prosecutions and transitional justice measures.", "newParagraph": "given complexity planning designing political reintegration intervention ddr practitioner must consider following key factor influencing viability outcome group level political transformation armed force group n nature peace eg negotiated peace agreement military victory etc n postconflict security situation n motivation armed group keeping mind motivation change time n degree popular support perceived legitimacy n degree political experience capacity n leadership capacity n organizational structure n resource funding technical support n criminal prosecution transitional justice measure", "ProcessedSent": " n postconflict security situation n motivation armed group keeping mind motivation change time n degree popular support perceived legitimacy n degree political experience capacity n leadership capacity n organizational structure n resource funding technical support n criminal prosecution transitional justice measure", "SentID": 5754 @@ -104581,7 +104581,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1796, - "Paragraph": "DDR programme managers will need to ensure close coordination: \\n In the field, where coordination among UN entities, national counterparts, receiving communities, NGOs, donors, governmental aid organizations, and other implementing partners should be established at the earliest stages of mission planning; \\n At Headquarters, through integrated mission planning structures and processes (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures) to ensure that coordinated, coherent and consistent direction and support is provided to field operators; \\n Between the field and Headquarters, to ensure that lessons learned and policy devel- opment on DDR are built into field-level programming, particularly at the start of missions and DDR processes, as well as to ensure the participation of key stakehold- ers at the international level.", + "Paragraph": "DDR programme managers will need to ensure close coordination: \n In the field, where coordination among UN entities, national counterparts, receiving communities, NGOs, donors, governmental aid organizations, and other implementing partners should be established at the earliest stages of mission planning; \n At Headquarters, through integrated mission planning structures and processes (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures) to ensure that coordinated, coherent and consistent direction and support is provided to field operators; \n Between the field and Headquarters, to ensure that lessons learned and policy devel- opment on DDR are built into field-level programming, particularly at the start of missions and DDR processes, as well as to ensure the participation of key stakehold- ers at the international level.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -104592,7 +104592,7 @@ "Heading2": "12. Linking reintegration to wider recovery and development", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "DDR programme managers will need to ensure close coordination: \\n In the field, where coordination among UN entities, national counterparts, receiving communities, NGOs, donors, governmental aid organizations, and other implementing partners should be established at the earliest stages of mission planning; \\n At Headquarters, through integrated mission planning structures and processes (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures) to ensure that coordinated, coherent and consistent direction and support is provided to field operators; \\n Between the field and Headquarters, to ensure that lessons learned and policy devel- opment on DDR are built into field-level programming, particularly at the start of missions and DDR processes, as well as to ensure the participation of key stakehold- ers at the international level.", + "Sentence": "DDR programme managers will need to ensure close coordination: \n In the field, where coordination among UN entities, national counterparts, receiving communities, NGOs, donors, governmental aid organizations, and other implementing partners should be established at the earliest stages of mission planning; \n At Headquarters, through integrated mission planning structures and processes (also see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning: Processes and Structures) to ensure that coordinated, coherent and consistent direction and support is provided to field operators; \n Between the field and Headquarters, to ensure that lessons learned and policy devel- opment on DDR are built into field-level programming, particularly at the start of missions and DDR processes, as well as to ensure the participation of key stakehold- ers at the international level.", "newParagraph": "ddr programme manager need ensure close coordination n field coordination among un entity national counterpart receiving community ngo donor governmental aid organization implementing partner established earliest stage mission planning n headquarters integrated mission planning structure process also see iddrs 310 integrated ddr planning process structure ensure coordinated coherent consistent direction support provided field operator n field headquarters ensure lesson learned policy devel opment ddr built fieldlevel programming particularly start mission ddr process well ensure participation key stakehold er international level", "ProcessedSent": "ddr programme manager need ensure close coordination n field coordination among un entity national counterpart receiving community ngo donor governmental aid organization implementing partner established earliest stage mission planning n headquarters integrated mission planning structure process also see iddrs 310 integrated ddr planning process structure ensure coordinated coherent consistent direction support provided field operator n field headquarters ensure lesson learned policy devel opment ddr built fieldlevel programming particularly start mission ddr process well ensure participation key stakehold er international level", "SentID": 5810 @@ -105499,7 +105499,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1815, - "Paragraph": "UN inter-agency policies, guidelines and frameworks \\n i. Policy for Post-conflict Employment Creation, Income Generation and Reintegration (2008) \\n ii. Operational Guidance Note for Post-conflict Employment Creation, Income Generation and Reintegration (2009) \\n iii. CWGER Guidance Note on Early Recovery (2008)", + "Paragraph": "UN inter-agency policies, guidelines and frameworks \n i. Policy for Post-conflict Employment Creation, Income Generation and Reintegration (2008) \n ii. Operational Guidance Note for Post-conflict Employment Creation, Income Generation and Reintegration (2009) \n iii. CWGER Guidance Note on Early Recovery (2008)", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -105510,14 +105510,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "UN inter-agency policies, guidelines and frameworks \\n i.", + "Sentence": "UN inter-agency policies, guidelines and frameworks \n i.", "newParagraph": "un interagency policy guideline framework n policy postconflict employment creation income generation reintegration 2008 n ii operational guidance note postconflict employment creation income generation reintegration 2009 n iii cwger guidance note early recovery 2008", "ProcessedSent": "un interagency policy guideline framework n", "SentID": 5861 }, { "ParagraphID": 1815, - "Paragraph": "UN inter-agency policies, guidelines and frameworks \\n i. Policy for Post-conflict Employment Creation, Income Generation and Reintegration (2008) \\n ii. Operational Guidance Note for Post-conflict Employment Creation, Income Generation and Reintegration (2009) \\n iii. CWGER Guidance Note on Early Recovery (2008)", + "Paragraph": "UN inter-agency policies, guidelines and frameworks \n i. Policy for Post-conflict Employment Creation, Income Generation and Reintegration (2008) \n ii. Operational Guidance Note for Post-conflict Employment Creation, Income Generation and Reintegration (2009) \n iii. CWGER Guidance Note on Early Recovery (2008)", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -105528,14 +105528,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Policy for Post-conflict Employment Creation, Income Generation and Reintegration (2008) \\n ii.", + "Sentence": "Policy for Post-conflict Employment Creation, Income Generation and Reintegration (2008) \n ii.", "newParagraph": "un interagency policy guideline framework n policy postconflict employment creation income generation reintegration 2008 n ii operational guidance note postconflict employment creation income generation reintegration 2009 n iii cwger guidance note early recovery 2008", "ProcessedSent": "policy postconflict employment creation income generation reintegration 2008 n ii", "SentID": 5862 }, { "ParagraphID": 1815, - "Paragraph": "UN inter-agency policies, guidelines and frameworks \\n i. Policy for Post-conflict Employment Creation, Income Generation and Reintegration (2008) \\n ii. Operational Guidance Note for Post-conflict Employment Creation, Income Generation and Reintegration (2009) \\n iii. CWGER Guidance Note on Early Recovery (2008)", + "Paragraph": "UN inter-agency policies, guidelines and frameworks \n i. Policy for Post-conflict Employment Creation, Income Generation and Reintegration (2008) \n ii. Operational Guidance Note for Post-conflict Employment Creation, Income Generation and Reintegration (2009) \n iii. CWGER Guidance Note on Early Recovery (2008)", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -105546,14 +105546,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Operational Guidance Note for Post-conflict Employment Creation, Income Generation and Reintegration (2009) \\n iii.", + "Sentence": "Operational Guidance Note for Post-conflict Employment Creation, Income Generation and Reintegration (2009) \n iii.", "newParagraph": "un interagency policy guideline framework n policy postconflict employment creation income generation reintegration 2008 n ii operational guidance note postconflict employment creation income generation reintegration 2009 n iii cwger guidance note early recovery 2008", "ProcessedSent": "operational guidance note postconflict employment creation income generation reintegration 2009 n iii", "SentID": 5863 }, { "ParagraphID": 1815, - "Paragraph": "UN inter-agency policies, guidelines and frameworks \\n i. Policy for Post-conflict Employment Creation, Income Generation and Reintegration (2008) \\n ii. Operational Guidance Note for Post-conflict Employment Creation, Income Generation and Reintegration (2009) \\n iii. CWGER Guidance Note on Early Recovery (2008)", + "Paragraph": "UN inter-agency policies, guidelines and frameworks \n i. Policy for Post-conflict Employment Creation, Income Generation and Reintegration (2008) \n ii. Operational Guidance Note for Post-conflict Employment Creation, Income Generation and Reintegration (2009) \n iii. CWGER Guidance Note on Early Recovery (2008)", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -105571,7 +105571,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1816, - "Paragraph": "UN agency policies, guidelines and frameworks \\n i. ILO Guidebook for Socio-Economic Reintegration of Ex-Combatants (2009) \\n ii. ILO Guidelines for Local Economic Recovery in Post-Conflict (2010) \\n iii. Policy Framework & Implementation Strategy - UNHCR\u2019s Role in Support of the Return & Reintegration of Displaced Populations \\n iv. UNICEF-ILO Technical Note on Economic Reintegration of Children Associated with Armed Forces and Groups (draft under production)", + "Paragraph": "UN agency policies, guidelines and frameworks \n i. ILO Guidebook for Socio-Economic Reintegration of Ex-Combatants (2009) \n ii. ILO Guidelines for Local Economic Recovery in Post-Conflict (2010) \n iii. Policy Framework & Implementation Strategy - UNHCR\u2019s Role in Support of the Return & Reintegration of Displaced Populations \n iv. UNICEF-ILO Technical Note on Economic Reintegration of Children Associated with Armed Forces and Groups (draft under production)", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -105582,14 +105582,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "UN agency policies, guidelines and frameworks \\n i. ILO Guidebook for Socio-Economic Reintegration of Ex-Combatants (2009) \\n ii.", + "Sentence": "UN agency policies, guidelines and frameworks \n i. ILO Guidebook for Socio-Economic Reintegration of Ex-Combatants (2009) \n ii.", "newParagraph": "un agency policy guideline framework n ilo guidebook socioeconomic reintegration excombatants 2009 n ii ilo guideline local economic recovery postconflict 2010 n iii policy framework implementation strategy unhcr role support return reintegration displaced population n iv unicefilo technical note economic reintegration child associated armed force group draft production", "ProcessedSent": "un agency policy guideline framework n ilo guidebook socioeconomic reintegration excombatants 2009 n ii", "SentID": 5865 }, { "ParagraphID": 1816, - "Paragraph": "UN agency policies, guidelines and frameworks \\n i. ILO Guidebook for Socio-Economic Reintegration of Ex-Combatants (2009) \\n ii. ILO Guidelines for Local Economic Recovery in Post-Conflict (2010) \\n iii. Policy Framework & Implementation Strategy - UNHCR\u2019s Role in Support of the Return & Reintegration of Displaced Populations \\n iv. UNICEF-ILO Technical Note on Economic Reintegration of Children Associated with Armed Forces and Groups (draft under production)", + "Paragraph": "UN agency policies, guidelines and frameworks \n i. ILO Guidebook for Socio-Economic Reintegration of Ex-Combatants (2009) \n ii. ILO Guidelines for Local Economic Recovery in Post-Conflict (2010) \n iii. Policy Framework & Implementation Strategy - UNHCR\u2019s Role in Support of the Return & Reintegration of Displaced Populations \n iv. UNICEF-ILO Technical Note on Economic Reintegration of Children Associated with Armed Forces and Groups (draft under production)", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -105600,14 +105600,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "ILO Guidelines for Local Economic Recovery in Post-Conflict (2010) \\n iii.", + "Sentence": "ILO Guidelines for Local Economic Recovery in Post-Conflict (2010) \n iii.", "newParagraph": "un agency policy guideline framework n ilo guidebook socioeconomic reintegration excombatants 2009 n ii ilo guideline local economic recovery postconflict 2010 n iii policy framework implementation strategy unhcr role support return reintegration displaced population n iv unicefilo technical note economic reintegration child associated armed force group draft production", "ProcessedSent": "ilo guideline local economic recovery postconflict 2010 n iii", "SentID": 5866 }, { "ParagraphID": 1816, - "Paragraph": "UN agency policies, guidelines and frameworks \\n i. ILO Guidebook for Socio-Economic Reintegration of Ex-Combatants (2009) \\n ii. ILO Guidelines for Local Economic Recovery in Post-Conflict (2010) \\n iii. Policy Framework & Implementation Strategy - UNHCR\u2019s Role in Support of the Return & Reintegration of Displaced Populations \\n iv. UNICEF-ILO Technical Note on Economic Reintegration of Children Associated with Armed Forces and Groups (draft under production)", + "Paragraph": "UN agency policies, guidelines and frameworks \n i. ILO Guidebook for Socio-Economic Reintegration of Ex-Combatants (2009) \n ii. ILO Guidelines for Local Economic Recovery in Post-Conflict (2010) \n iii. Policy Framework & Implementation Strategy - UNHCR\u2019s Role in Support of the Return & Reintegration of Displaced Populations \n iv. UNICEF-ILO Technical Note on Economic Reintegration of Children Associated with Armed Forces and Groups (draft under production)", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -105618,14 +105618,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Policy Framework & Implementation Strategy - UNHCR\u2019s Role in Support of the Return & Reintegration of Displaced Populations \\n iv.", + "Sentence": "Policy Framework & Implementation Strategy - UNHCR\u2019s Role in Support of the Return & Reintegration of Displaced Populations \n iv.", "newParagraph": "un agency policy guideline framework n ilo guidebook socioeconomic reintegration excombatants 2009 n ii ilo guideline local economic recovery postconflict 2010 n iii policy framework implementation strategy unhcr role support return reintegration displaced population n iv unicefilo technical note economic reintegration child associated armed force group draft production", "ProcessedSent": "policy framework implementation strategy unhcr role support return reintegration displaced population n iv", "SentID": 5867 }, { "ParagraphID": 1816, - "Paragraph": "UN agency policies, guidelines and frameworks \\n i. ILO Guidebook for Socio-Economic Reintegration of Ex-Combatants (2009) \\n ii. ILO Guidelines for Local Economic Recovery in Post-Conflict (2010) \\n iii. Policy Framework & Implementation Strategy - UNHCR\u2019s Role in Support of the Return & Reintegration of Displaced Populations \\n iv. UNICEF-ILO Technical Note on Economic Reintegration of Children Associated with Armed Forces and Groups (draft under production)", + "Paragraph": "UN agency policies, guidelines and frameworks \n i. ILO Guidebook for Socio-Economic Reintegration of Ex-Combatants (2009) \n ii. ILO Guidelines for Local Economic Recovery in Post-Conflict (2010) \n iii. Policy Framework & Implementation Strategy - UNHCR\u2019s Role in Support of the Return & Reintegration of Displaced Populations \n iv. UNICEF-ILO Technical Note on Economic Reintegration of Children Associated with Armed Forces and Groups (draft under production)", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -105643,7 +105643,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1817, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 United Nations System Chief Executives Board for Coordination (CEB) Toolkit for Mainstreaming Employment and Decent Work, 2007. \\n 2 Taken from the Prevention of child recruitment and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups: Strategic framework for addressing the economic gap, ILO (2007). \\n 3 International Labour Organization. 2009. Guidelines for the Socio-economic Reintegration of Ex-combatants. Geneva, Switzerland, pp.23-29.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 United Nations System Chief Executives Board for Coordination (CEB) Toolkit for Mainstreaming Employment and Decent Work, 2007. \n 2 Taken from the Prevention of child recruitment and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups: Strategic framework for addressing the economic gap, ILO (2007). \n 3 International Labour Organization. 2009. Guidelines for the Socio-economic Reintegration of Ex-combatants. Geneva, Switzerland, pp.23-29.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -105654,14 +105654,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 1 United Nations System Chief Executives Board for Coordination (CEB) Toolkit for Mainstreaming Employment and Decent Work, 2007.", + "Sentence": "\n 1 United Nations System Chief Executives Board for Coordination (CEB) Toolkit for Mainstreaming Employment and Decent Work, 2007.", "newParagraph": "n 1 united nation system chief executive board coordination ceb toolkit mainstreaming employment decent work 2007 n 2 taken prevention child recruitment reintegration child associated armed force group strategic framework addressing economic gap ilo 2007 n 3 international labour organization 2009 guideline socioeconomic reintegration excombatants geneva switzerland pp2329", "ProcessedSent": "n 1 united nation system chief executive board coordination ceb toolkit mainstreaming employment decent work 2007", "SentID": 5869 }, { "ParagraphID": 1817, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 United Nations System Chief Executives Board for Coordination (CEB) Toolkit for Mainstreaming Employment and Decent Work, 2007. \\n 2 Taken from the Prevention of child recruitment and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups: Strategic framework for addressing the economic gap, ILO (2007). \\n 3 International Labour Organization. 2009. Guidelines for the Socio-economic Reintegration of Ex-combatants. Geneva, Switzerland, pp.23-29.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 United Nations System Chief Executives Board for Coordination (CEB) Toolkit for Mainstreaming Employment and Decent Work, 2007. \n 2 Taken from the Prevention of child recruitment and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups: Strategic framework for addressing the economic gap, ILO (2007). \n 3 International Labour Organization. 2009. Guidelines for the Socio-economic Reintegration of Ex-combatants. Geneva, Switzerland, pp.23-29.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -105672,14 +105672,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 2 Taken from the Prevention of child recruitment and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups: Strategic framework for addressing the economic gap, ILO (2007).", + "Sentence": "\n 2 Taken from the Prevention of child recruitment and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups: Strategic framework for addressing the economic gap, ILO (2007).", "newParagraph": "n 1 united nation system chief executive board coordination ceb toolkit mainstreaming employment decent work 2007 n 2 taken prevention child recruitment reintegration child associated armed force group strategic framework addressing economic gap ilo 2007 n 3 international labour organization 2009 guideline socioeconomic reintegration excombatants geneva switzerland pp2329", "ProcessedSent": "n 2 taken prevention child recruitment reintegration child associated armed force group strategic framework addressing economic gap ilo 2007", "SentID": 5870 }, { "ParagraphID": 1817, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 United Nations System Chief Executives Board for Coordination (CEB) Toolkit for Mainstreaming Employment and Decent Work, 2007. \\n 2 Taken from the Prevention of child recruitment and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups: Strategic framework for addressing the economic gap, ILO (2007). \\n 3 International Labour Organization. 2009. Guidelines for the Socio-economic Reintegration of Ex-combatants. Geneva, Switzerland, pp.23-29.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 United Nations System Chief Executives Board for Coordination (CEB) Toolkit for Mainstreaming Employment and Decent Work, 2007. \n 2 Taken from the Prevention of child recruitment and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups: Strategic framework for addressing the economic gap, ILO (2007). \n 3 International Labour Organization. 2009. Guidelines for the Socio-economic Reintegration of Ex-combatants. Geneva, Switzerland, pp.23-29.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -105690,14 +105690,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 3 International Labour Organization.", + "Sentence": "\n 3 International Labour Organization.", "newParagraph": "n 1 united nation system chief executive board coordination ceb toolkit mainstreaming employment decent work 2007 n 2 taken prevention child recruitment reintegration child associated armed force group strategic framework addressing economic gap ilo 2007 n 3 international labour organization 2009 guideline socioeconomic reintegration excombatants geneva switzerland pp2329", "ProcessedSent": "n 3 international labour organization", "SentID": 5871 }, { "ParagraphID": 1817, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 United Nations System Chief Executives Board for Coordination (CEB) Toolkit for Mainstreaming Employment and Decent Work, 2007. \\n 2 Taken from the Prevention of child recruitment and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups: Strategic framework for addressing the economic gap, ILO (2007). \\n 3 International Labour Organization. 2009. Guidelines for the Socio-economic Reintegration of Ex-combatants. Geneva, Switzerland, pp.23-29.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 United Nations System Chief Executives Board for Coordination (CEB) Toolkit for Mainstreaming Employment and Decent Work, 2007. \n 2 Taken from the Prevention of child recruitment and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups: Strategic framework for addressing the economic gap, ILO (2007). \n 3 International Labour Organization. 2009. Guidelines for the Socio-economic Reintegration of Ex-combatants. Geneva, Switzerland, pp.23-29.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -105715,7 +105715,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1817, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 United Nations System Chief Executives Board for Coordination (CEB) Toolkit for Mainstreaming Employment and Decent Work, 2007. \\n 2 Taken from the Prevention of child recruitment and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups: Strategic framework for addressing the economic gap, ILO (2007). \\n 3 International Labour Organization. 2009. Guidelines for the Socio-economic Reintegration of Ex-combatants. Geneva, Switzerland, pp.23-29.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 United Nations System Chief Executives Board for Coordination (CEB) Toolkit for Mainstreaming Employment and Decent Work, 2007. \n 2 Taken from the Prevention of child recruitment and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups: Strategic framework for addressing the economic gap, ILO (2007). \n 3 International Labour Organization. 2009. Guidelines for the Socio-economic Reintegration of Ex-combatants. Geneva, Switzerland, pp.23-29.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -105733,7 +105733,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1817, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 United Nations System Chief Executives Board for Coordination (CEB) Toolkit for Mainstreaming Employment and Decent Work, 2007. \\n 2 Taken from the Prevention of child recruitment and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups: Strategic framework for addressing the economic gap, ILO (2007). \\n 3 International Labour Organization. 2009. Guidelines for the Socio-economic Reintegration of Ex-combatants. Geneva, Switzerland, pp.23-29.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 United Nations System Chief Executives Board for Coordination (CEB) Toolkit for Mainstreaming Employment and Decent Work, 2007. \n 2 Taken from the Prevention of child recruitment and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups: Strategic framework for addressing the economic gap, ILO (2007). \n 3 International Labour Organization. 2009. Guidelines for the Socio-economic Reintegration of Ex-combatants. Geneva, Switzerland, pp.23-29.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -106129,7 +106129,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1825, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should,\u2019 \u2018may,\u2019 \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should,\u2019 \u2018may,\u2019 \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -106147,7 +106147,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1825, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should,\u2019 \u2018may,\u2019 \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should,\u2019 \u2018may,\u2019 \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -106158,7 +106158,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may must used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "ProcessedSent": "use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "SentID": 5897 @@ -107263,7 +107263,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1843, - "Paragraph": "The military component can be made up of: \\n Formed units or contingents: These can include motorized, mechanized and light infantry units, aviation units, engineering units, and various support units, some of which can provide logistics support, including specialists in explosives and weapons destruction. Normally the support element of the force, usually called the Enabler, is designed primarily for the needs of the overall mission. The chief of mission support controls the tasking of logistics support, aviation, engineering and mobile medical\/field hospital units. \\n Military observers: MILOBs are officers normally provided by Member States for 12 months who operate in small teams of between two and six. Where possible, MILOBs are incorporated into the force command structure. MILOBs typically operate unarmed. \\n Staff officers: Individual military officers serve in staff posts, both within the force headquarters and in various specialized positions where some are integrated with the civilian staff. Some staff officers are deployed on individual assignments, while others are part of broader military contingents. \\n\\n Table 1 below shows the various structures and ranks within a military component. It should be taken as a broad guide only, as each contingent may vary.", + "Paragraph": "The military component can be made up of: \n Formed units or contingents: These can include motorized, mechanized and light infantry units, aviation units, engineering units, and various support units, some of which can provide logistics support, including specialists in explosives and weapons destruction. Normally the support element of the force, usually called the Enabler, is designed primarily for the needs of the overall mission. The chief of mission support controls the tasking of logistics support, aviation, engineering and mobile medical\/field hospital units. \n Military observers: MILOBs are officers normally provided by Member States for 12 months who operate in small teams of between two and six. Where possible, MILOBs are incorporated into the force command structure. MILOBs typically operate unarmed. \n Staff officers: Individual military officers serve in staff posts, both within the force headquarters and in various specialized positions where some are integrated with the civilian staff. Some staff officers are deployed on individual assignments, while others are part of broader military contingents. \n\n Table 1 below shows the various structures and ranks within a military component. It should be taken as a broad guide only, as each contingent may vary.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -107274,14 +107274,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Composition", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The military component can be made up of: \\n Formed units or contingents: These can include motorized, mechanized and light infantry units, aviation units, engineering units, and various support units, some of which can provide logistics support, including specialists in explosives and weapons destruction.", + "Sentence": "The military component can be made up of: \n Formed units or contingents: These can include motorized, mechanized and light infantry units, aviation units, engineering units, and various support units, some of which can provide logistics support, including specialists in explosives and weapons destruction.", "newParagraph": "military component made n formed unit contingent include motorized mechanized light infantry unit aviation unit engineering unit various support unit provide logistics support including specialist explosive weapon destruction normally support element force usually called enabler designed primarily need overall mission chief mission support control tasking logistics support aviation engineering mobile medicalfield hospital unit n military observer milobs officer normally provided member state 12 month operate small team two six possible milobs incorporated force command structure milobs typically operate unarmed n staff officer individual military officer serve staff post within force headquarters various specialized position integrated civilian staff staff officer deployed individual assignment others part broader military contingent nn table 1 show various structure rank within military component taken broad guide contingent may vary", "ProcessedSent": "military component made n formed unit contingent include motorized mechanized light infantry unit aviation unit engineering unit various support unit provide logistics support including specialist explosive weapon destruction", "SentID": 5959 }, { "ParagraphID": 1843, - "Paragraph": "The military component can be made up of: \\n Formed units or contingents: These can include motorized, mechanized and light infantry units, aviation units, engineering units, and various support units, some of which can provide logistics support, including specialists in explosives and weapons destruction. Normally the support element of the force, usually called the Enabler, is designed primarily for the needs of the overall mission. The chief of mission support controls the tasking of logistics support, aviation, engineering and mobile medical\/field hospital units. \\n Military observers: MILOBs are officers normally provided by Member States for 12 months who operate in small teams of between two and six. Where possible, MILOBs are incorporated into the force command structure. MILOBs typically operate unarmed. \\n Staff officers: Individual military officers serve in staff posts, both within the force headquarters and in various specialized positions where some are integrated with the civilian staff. Some staff officers are deployed on individual assignments, while others are part of broader military contingents. \\n\\n Table 1 below shows the various structures and ranks within a military component. It should be taken as a broad guide only, as each contingent may vary.", + "Paragraph": "The military component can be made up of: \n Formed units or contingents: These can include motorized, mechanized and light infantry units, aviation units, engineering units, and various support units, some of which can provide logistics support, including specialists in explosives and weapons destruction. Normally the support element of the force, usually called the Enabler, is designed primarily for the needs of the overall mission. The chief of mission support controls the tasking of logistics support, aviation, engineering and mobile medical\/field hospital units. \n Military observers: MILOBs are officers normally provided by Member States for 12 months who operate in small teams of between two and six. Where possible, MILOBs are incorporated into the force command structure. MILOBs typically operate unarmed. \n Staff officers: Individual military officers serve in staff posts, both within the force headquarters and in various specialized positions where some are integrated with the civilian staff. Some staff officers are deployed on individual assignments, while others are part of broader military contingents. \n\n Table 1 below shows the various structures and ranks within a military component. It should be taken as a broad guide only, as each contingent may vary.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -107299,7 +107299,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1843, - "Paragraph": "The military component can be made up of: \\n Formed units or contingents: These can include motorized, mechanized and light infantry units, aviation units, engineering units, and various support units, some of which can provide logistics support, including specialists in explosives and weapons destruction. Normally the support element of the force, usually called the Enabler, is designed primarily for the needs of the overall mission. The chief of mission support controls the tasking of logistics support, aviation, engineering and mobile medical\/field hospital units. \\n Military observers: MILOBs are officers normally provided by Member States for 12 months who operate in small teams of between two and six. Where possible, MILOBs are incorporated into the force command structure. MILOBs typically operate unarmed. \\n Staff officers: Individual military officers serve in staff posts, both within the force headquarters and in various specialized positions where some are integrated with the civilian staff. Some staff officers are deployed on individual assignments, while others are part of broader military contingents. \\n\\n Table 1 below shows the various structures and ranks within a military component. It should be taken as a broad guide only, as each contingent may vary.", + "Paragraph": "The military component can be made up of: \n Formed units or contingents: These can include motorized, mechanized and light infantry units, aviation units, engineering units, and various support units, some of which can provide logistics support, including specialists in explosives and weapons destruction. Normally the support element of the force, usually called the Enabler, is designed primarily for the needs of the overall mission. The chief of mission support controls the tasking of logistics support, aviation, engineering and mobile medical\/field hospital units. \n Military observers: MILOBs are officers normally provided by Member States for 12 months who operate in small teams of between two and six. Where possible, MILOBs are incorporated into the force command structure. MILOBs typically operate unarmed. \n Staff officers: Individual military officers serve in staff posts, both within the force headquarters and in various specialized positions where some are integrated with the civilian staff. Some staff officers are deployed on individual assignments, while others are part of broader military contingents. \n\n Table 1 below shows the various structures and ranks within a military component. It should be taken as a broad guide only, as each contingent may vary.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -107317,7 +107317,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1843, - "Paragraph": "The military component can be made up of: \\n Formed units or contingents: These can include motorized, mechanized and light infantry units, aviation units, engineering units, and various support units, some of which can provide logistics support, including specialists in explosives and weapons destruction. Normally the support element of the force, usually called the Enabler, is designed primarily for the needs of the overall mission. The chief of mission support controls the tasking of logistics support, aviation, engineering and mobile medical\/field hospital units. \\n Military observers: MILOBs are officers normally provided by Member States for 12 months who operate in small teams of between two and six. Where possible, MILOBs are incorporated into the force command structure. MILOBs typically operate unarmed. \\n Staff officers: Individual military officers serve in staff posts, both within the force headquarters and in various specialized positions where some are integrated with the civilian staff. Some staff officers are deployed on individual assignments, while others are part of broader military contingents. \\n\\n Table 1 below shows the various structures and ranks within a military component. It should be taken as a broad guide only, as each contingent may vary.", + "Paragraph": "The military component can be made up of: \n Formed units or contingents: These can include motorized, mechanized and light infantry units, aviation units, engineering units, and various support units, some of which can provide logistics support, including specialists in explosives and weapons destruction. Normally the support element of the force, usually called the Enabler, is designed primarily for the needs of the overall mission. The chief of mission support controls the tasking of logistics support, aviation, engineering and mobile medical\/field hospital units. \n Military observers: MILOBs are officers normally provided by Member States for 12 months who operate in small teams of between two and six. Where possible, MILOBs are incorporated into the force command structure. MILOBs typically operate unarmed. \n Staff officers: Individual military officers serve in staff posts, both within the force headquarters and in various specialized positions where some are integrated with the civilian staff. Some staff officers are deployed on individual assignments, while others are part of broader military contingents. \n\n Table 1 below shows the various structures and ranks within a military component. It should be taken as a broad guide only, as each contingent may vary.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -107328,14 +107328,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Composition", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Military observers: MILOBs are officers normally provided by Member States for 12 months who operate in small teams of between two and six.", + "Sentence": "\n Military observers: MILOBs are officers normally provided by Member States for 12 months who operate in small teams of between two and six.", "newParagraph": "military component made n formed unit contingent include motorized mechanized light infantry unit aviation unit engineering unit various support unit provide logistics support including specialist explosive weapon destruction normally support element force usually called enabler designed primarily need overall mission chief mission support control tasking logistics support aviation engineering mobile medicalfield hospital unit n military observer milobs officer normally provided member state 12 month operate small team two six possible milobs incorporated force command structure milobs typically operate unarmed n staff officer individual military officer serve staff post within force headquarters various specialized position integrated civilian staff staff officer deployed individual assignment others part broader military contingent nn table 1 show various structure rank within military component taken broad guide contingent may vary", "ProcessedSent": "n military observer milobs officer normally provided member state 12 month operate small team two six", "SentID": 5962 }, { "ParagraphID": 1843, - "Paragraph": "The military component can be made up of: \\n Formed units or contingents: These can include motorized, mechanized and light infantry units, aviation units, engineering units, and various support units, some of which can provide logistics support, including specialists in explosives and weapons destruction. Normally the support element of the force, usually called the Enabler, is designed primarily for the needs of the overall mission. The chief of mission support controls the tasking of logistics support, aviation, engineering and mobile medical\/field hospital units. \\n Military observers: MILOBs are officers normally provided by Member States for 12 months who operate in small teams of between two and six. Where possible, MILOBs are incorporated into the force command structure. MILOBs typically operate unarmed. \\n Staff officers: Individual military officers serve in staff posts, both within the force headquarters and in various specialized positions where some are integrated with the civilian staff. Some staff officers are deployed on individual assignments, while others are part of broader military contingents. \\n\\n Table 1 below shows the various structures and ranks within a military component. It should be taken as a broad guide only, as each contingent may vary.", + "Paragraph": "The military component can be made up of: \n Formed units or contingents: These can include motorized, mechanized and light infantry units, aviation units, engineering units, and various support units, some of which can provide logistics support, including specialists in explosives and weapons destruction. Normally the support element of the force, usually called the Enabler, is designed primarily for the needs of the overall mission. The chief of mission support controls the tasking of logistics support, aviation, engineering and mobile medical\/field hospital units. \n Military observers: MILOBs are officers normally provided by Member States for 12 months who operate in small teams of between two and six. Where possible, MILOBs are incorporated into the force command structure. MILOBs typically operate unarmed. \n Staff officers: Individual military officers serve in staff posts, both within the force headquarters and in various specialized positions where some are integrated with the civilian staff. Some staff officers are deployed on individual assignments, while others are part of broader military contingents. \n\n Table 1 below shows the various structures and ranks within a military component. It should be taken as a broad guide only, as each contingent may vary.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -107353,7 +107353,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1843, - "Paragraph": "The military component can be made up of: \\n Formed units or contingents: These can include motorized, mechanized and light infantry units, aviation units, engineering units, and various support units, some of which can provide logistics support, including specialists in explosives and weapons destruction. Normally the support element of the force, usually called the Enabler, is designed primarily for the needs of the overall mission. The chief of mission support controls the tasking of logistics support, aviation, engineering and mobile medical\/field hospital units. \\n Military observers: MILOBs are officers normally provided by Member States for 12 months who operate in small teams of between two and six. Where possible, MILOBs are incorporated into the force command structure. MILOBs typically operate unarmed. \\n Staff officers: Individual military officers serve in staff posts, both within the force headquarters and in various specialized positions where some are integrated with the civilian staff. Some staff officers are deployed on individual assignments, while others are part of broader military contingents. \\n\\n Table 1 below shows the various structures and ranks within a military component. It should be taken as a broad guide only, as each contingent may vary.", + "Paragraph": "The military component can be made up of: \n Formed units or contingents: These can include motorized, mechanized and light infantry units, aviation units, engineering units, and various support units, some of which can provide logistics support, including specialists in explosives and weapons destruction. Normally the support element of the force, usually called the Enabler, is designed primarily for the needs of the overall mission. The chief of mission support controls the tasking of logistics support, aviation, engineering and mobile medical\/field hospital units. \n Military observers: MILOBs are officers normally provided by Member States for 12 months who operate in small teams of between two and six. Where possible, MILOBs are incorporated into the force command structure. MILOBs typically operate unarmed. \n Staff officers: Individual military officers serve in staff posts, both within the force headquarters and in various specialized positions where some are integrated with the civilian staff. Some staff officers are deployed on individual assignments, while others are part of broader military contingents. \n\n Table 1 below shows the various structures and ranks within a military component. It should be taken as a broad guide only, as each contingent may vary.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -107371,7 +107371,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1843, - "Paragraph": "The military component can be made up of: \\n Formed units or contingents: These can include motorized, mechanized and light infantry units, aviation units, engineering units, and various support units, some of which can provide logistics support, including specialists in explosives and weapons destruction. Normally the support element of the force, usually called the Enabler, is designed primarily for the needs of the overall mission. The chief of mission support controls the tasking of logistics support, aviation, engineering and mobile medical\/field hospital units. \\n Military observers: MILOBs are officers normally provided by Member States for 12 months who operate in small teams of between two and six. Where possible, MILOBs are incorporated into the force command structure. MILOBs typically operate unarmed. \\n Staff officers: Individual military officers serve in staff posts, both within the force headquarters and in various specialized positions where some are integrated with the civilian staff. Some staff officers are deployed on individual assignments, while others are part of broader military contingents. \\n\\n Table 1 below shows the various structures and ranks within a military component. It should be taken as a broad guide only, as each contingent may vary.", + "Paragraph": "The military component can be made up of: \n Formed units or contingents: These can include motorized, mechanized and light infantry units, aviation units, engineering units, and various support units, some of which can provide logistics support, including specialists in explosives and weapons destruction. Normally the support element of the force, usually called the Enabler, is designed primarily for the needs of the overall mission. The chief of mission support controls the tasking of logistics support, aviation, engineering and mobile medical\/field hospital units. \n Military observers: MILOBs are officers normally provided by Member States for 12 months who operate in small teams of between two and six. Where possible, MILOBs are incorporated into the force command structure. MILOBs typically operate unarmed. \n Staff officers: Individual military officers serve in staff posts, both within the force headquarters and in various specialized positions where some are integrated with the civilian staff. Some staff officers are deployed on individual assignments, while others are part of broader military contingents. \n\n Table 1 below shows the various structures and ranks within a military component. It should be taken as a broad guide only, as each contingent may vary.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -107382,14 +107382,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Composition", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Staff officers: Individual military officers serve in staff posts, both within the force headquarters and in various specialized positions where some are integrated with the civilian staff.", + "Sentence": "\n Staff officers: Individual military officers serve in staff posts, both within the force headquarters and in various specialized positions where some are integrated with the civilian staff.", "newParagraph": "military component made n formed unit contingent include motorized mechanized light infantry unit aviation unit engineering unit various support unit provide logistics support including specialist explosive weapon destruction normally support element force usually called enabler designed primarily need overall mission chief mission support control tasking logistics support aviation engineering mobile medicalfield hospital unit n military observer milobs officer normally provided member state 12 month operate small team two six possible milobs incorporated force command structure milobs typically operate unarmed n staff officer individual military officer serve staff post within force headquarters various specialized position integrated civilian staff staff officer deployed individual assignment others part broader military contingent nn table 1 show various structure rank within military component taken broad guide contingent may vary", "ProcessedSent": "n staff officer individual military officer serve staff post within force headquarters various specialized position integrated civilian staff", "SentID": 5965 }, { "ParagraphID": 1843, - "Paragraph": "The military component can be made up of: \\n Formed units or contingents: These can include motorized, mechanized and light infantry units, aviation units, engineering units, and various support units, some of which can provide logistics support, including specialists in explosives and weapons destruction. Normally the support element of the force, usually called the Enabler, is designed primarily for the needs of the overall mission. The chief of mission support controls the tasking of logistics support, aviation, engineering and mobile medical\/field hospital units. \\n Military observers: MILOBs are officers normally provided by Member States for 12 months who operate in small teams of between two and six. Where possible, MILOBs are incorporated into the force command structure. MILOBs typically operate unarmed. \\n Staff officers: Individual military officers serve in staff posts, both within the force headquarters and in various specialized positions where some are integrated with the civilian staff. Some staff officers are deployed on individual assignments, while others are part of broader military contingents. \\n\\n Table 1 below shows the various structures and ranks within a military component. It should be taken as a broad guide only, as each contingent may vary.", + "Paragraph": "The military component can be made up of: \n Formed units or contingents: These can include motorized, mechanized and light infantry units, aviation units, engineering units, and various support units, some of which can provide logistics support, including specialists in explosives and weapons destruction. Normally the support element of the force, usually called the Enabler, is designed primarily for the needs of the overall mission. The chief of mission support controls the tasking of logistics support, aviation, engineering and mobile medical\/field hospital units. \n Military observers: MILOBs are officers normally provided by Member States for 12 months who operate in small teams of between two and six. Where possible, MILOBs are incorporated into the force command structure. MILOBs typically operate unarmed. \n Staff officers: Individual military officers serve in staff posts, both within the force headquarters and in various specialized positions where some are integrated with the civilian staff. Some staff officers are deployed on individual assignments, while others are part of broader military contingents. \n\n Table 1 below shows the various structures and ranks within a military component. It should be taken as a broad guide only, as each contingent may vary.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -107407,7 +107407,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1843, - "Paragraph": "The military component can be made up of: \\n Formed units or contingents: These can include motorized, mechanized and light infantry units, aviation units, engineering units, and various support units, some of which can provide logistics support, including specialists in explosives and weapons destruction. Normally the support element of the force, usually called the Enabler, is designed primarily for the needs of the overall mission. The chief of mission support controls the tasking of logistics support, aviation, engineering and mobile medical\/field hospital units. \\n Military observers: MILOBs are officers normally provided by Member States for 12 months who operate in small teams of between two and six. Where possible, MILOBs are incorporated into the force command structure. MILOBs typically operate unarmed. \\n Staff officers: Individual military officers serve in staff posts, both within the force headquarters and in various specialized positions where some are integrated with the civilian staff. Some staff officers are deployed on individual assignments, while others are part of broader military contingents. \\n\\n Table 1 below shows the various structures and ranks within a military component. It should be taken as a broad guide only, as each contingent may vary.", + "Paragraph": "The military component can be made up of: \n Formed units or contingents: These can include motorized, mechanized and light infantry units, aviation units, engineering units, and various support units, some of which can provide logistics support, including specialists in explosives and weapons destruction. Normally the support element of the force, usually called the Enabler, is designed primarily for the needs of the overall mission. The chief of mission support controls the tasking of logistics support, aviation, engineering and mobile medical\/field hospital units. \n Military observers: MILOBs are officers normally provided by Member States for 12 months who operate in small teams of between two and six. Where possible, MILOBs are incorporated into the force command structure. MILOBs typically operate unarmed. \n Staff officers: Individual military officers serve in staff posts, both within the force headquarters and in various specialized positions where some are integrated with the civilian staff. Some staff officers are deployed on individual assignments, while others are part of broader military contingents. \n\n Table 1 below shows the various structures and ranks within a military component. It should be taken as a broad guide only, as each contingent may vary.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -107418,14 +107418,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Composition", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Table 1 below shows the various structures and ranks within a military component.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Table 1 below shows the various structures and ranks within a military component.", "newParagraph": "military component made n formed unit contingent include motorized mechanized light infantry unit aviation unit engineering unit various support unit provide logistics support including specialist explosive weapon destruction normally support element force usually called enabler designed primarily need overall mission chief mission support control tasking logistics support aviation engineering mobile medicalfield hospital unit n military observer milobs officer normally provided member state 12 month operate small team two six possible milobs incorporated force command structure milobs typically operate unarmed n staff officer individual military officer serve staff post within force headquarters various specialized position integrated civilian staff staff officer deployed individual assignment others part broader military contingent nn table 1 show various structure rank within military component taken broad guide contingent may vary", "ProcessedSent": "nn table 1 show various structure rank within military component", "SentID": 5967 }, { "ParagraphID": 1843, - "Paragraph": "The military component can be made up of: \\n Formed units or contingents: These can include motorized, mechanized and light infantry units, aviation units, engineering units, and various support units, some of which can provide logistics support, including specialists in explosives and weapons destruction. Normally the support element of the force, usually called the Enabler, is designed primarily for the needs of the overall mission. The chief of mission support controls the tasking of logistics support, aviation, engineering and mobile medical\/field hospital units. \\n Military observers: MILOBs are officers normally provided by Member States for 12 months who operate in small teams of between two and six. Where possible, MILOBs are incorporated into the force command structure. MILOBs typically operate unarmed. \\n Staff officers: Individual military officers serve in staff posts, both within the force headquarters and in various specialized positions where some are integrated with the civilian staff. Some staff officers are deployed on individual assignments, while others are part of broader military contingents. \\n\\n Table 1 below shows the various structures and ranks within a military component. It should be taken as a broad guide only, as each contingent may vary.", + "Paragraph": "The military component can be made up of: \n Formed units or contingents: These can include motorized, mechanized and light infantry units, aviation units, engineering units, and various support units, some of which can provide logistics support, including specialists in explosives and weapons destruction. Normally the support element of the force, usually called the Enabler, is designed primarily for the needs of the overall mission. The chief of mission support controls the tasking of logistics support, aviation, engineering and mobile medical\/field hospital units. \n Military observers: MILOBs are officers normally provided by Member States for 12 months who operate in small teams of between two and six. Where possible, MILOBs are incorporated into the force command structure. MILOBs typically operate unarmed. \n Staff officers: Individual military officers serve in staff posts, both within the force headquarters and in various specialized positions where some are integrated with the civilian staff. Some staff officers are deployed on individual assignments, while others are part of broader military contingents. \n\n Table 1 below shows the various structures and ranks within a military component. It should be taken as a broad guide only, as each contingent may vary.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -107767,7 +107767,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1849, - "Paragraph": "Military components may possess ammunition and weapons expertise useful for the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Disarmament typically involves the collection, documentation (registration), identification, storage, and disposal (including destruction) of conventional arms and ammunition (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). Depending on the methods agreed in peace agreements and plans for future national security forces, weapons and ammunition will either be destroyed or safely and securely managed. Military components can therefore assist in performing the following disarmament-related tasks, which should include a gender-perspective in their planning and execution: \\n Monitoring the separation of forces. \\n Monitoring troop withdrawal from agreed-upon areas. \\n Manning reception centres. \\n Undertaking identification and physical checks of weapons. \\n Collection, registration and identification of weapons, ammunition and explosives. \\n Registration of male and female ex-combatants and associated groups.", + "Paragraph": "Military components may possess ammunition and weapons expertise useful for the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Disarmament typically involves the collection, documentation (registration), identification, storage, and disposal (including destruction) of conventional arms and ammunition (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). Depending on the methods agreed in peace agreements and plans for future national security forces, weapons and ammunition will either be destroyed or safely and securely managed. Military components can therefore assist in performing the following disarmament-related tasks, which should include a gender-perspective in their planning and execution: \n Monitoring the separation of forces. \n Monitoring troop withdrawal from agreed-upon areas. \n Manning reception centres. \n Undertaking identification and physical checks of weapons. \n Collection, registration and identification of weapons, ammunition and explosives. \n Registration of male and female ex-combatants and associated groups.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -107785,7 +107785,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1849, - "Paragraph": "Military components may possess ammunition and weapons expertise useful for the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Disarmament typically involves the collection, documentation (registration), identification, storage, and disposal (including destruction) of conventional arms and ammunition (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). Depending on the methods agreed in peace agreements and plans for future national security forces, weapons and ammunition will either be destroyed or safely and securely managed. Military components can therefore assist in performing the following disarmament-related tasks, which should include a gender-perspective in their planning and execution: \\n Monitoring the separation of forces. \\n Monitoring troop withdrawal from agreed-upon areas. \\n Manning reception centres. \\n Undertaking identification and physical checks of weapons. \\n Collection, registration and identification of weapons, ammunition and explosives. \\n Registration of male and female ex-combatants and associated groups.", + "Paragraph": "Military components may possess ammunition and weapons expertise useful for the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Disarmament typically involves the collection, documentation (registration), identification, storage, and disposal (including destruction) of conventional arms and ammunition (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). Depending on the methods agreed in peace agreements and plans for future national security forces, weapons and ammunition will either be destroyed or safely and securely managed. Military components can therefore assist in performing the following disarmament-related tasks, which should include a gender-perspective in their planning and execution: \n Monitoring the separation of forces. \n Monitoring troop withdrawal from agreed-upon areas. \n Manning reception centres. \n Undertaking identification and physical checks of weapons. \n Collection, registration and identification of weapons, ammunition and explosives. \n Registration of male and female ex-combatants and associated groups.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -107803,7 +107803,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1849, - "Paragraph": "Military components may possess ammunition and weapons expertise useful for the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Disarmament typically involves the collection, documentation (registration), identification, storage, and disposal (including destruction) of conventional arms and ammunition (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). Depending on the methods agreed in peace agreements and plans for future national security forces, weapons and ammunition will either be destroyed or safely and securely managed. Military components can therefore assist in performing the following disarmament-related tasks, which should include a gender-perspective in their planning and execution: \\n Monitoring the separation of forces. \\n Monitoring troop withdrawal from agreed-upon areas. \\n Manning reception centres. \\n Undertaking identification and physical checks of weapons. \\n Collection, registration and identification of weapons, ammunition and explosives. \\n Registration of male and female ex-combatants and associated groups.", + "Paragraph": "Military components may possess ammunition and weapons expertise useful for the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Disarmament typically involves the collection, documentation (registration), identification, storage, and disposal (including destruction) of conventional arms and ammunition (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). Depending on the methods agreed in peace agreements and plans for future national security forces, weapons and ammunition will either be destroyed or safely and securely managed. Military components can therefore assist in performing the following disarmament-related tasks, which should include a gender-perspective in their planning and execution: \n Monitoring the separation of forces. \n Monitoring troop withdrawal from agreed-upon areas. \n Manning reception centres. \n Undertaking identification and physical checks of weapons. \n Collection, registration and identification of weapons, ammunition and explosives. \n Registration of male and female ex-combatants and associated groups.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -107821,7 +107821,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1849, - "Paragraph": "Military components may possess ammunition and weapons expertise useful for the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Disarmament typically involves the collection, documentation (registration), identification, storage, and disposal (including destruction) of conventional arms and ammunition (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). Depending on the methods agreed in peace agreements and plans for future national security forces, weapons and ammunition will either be destroyed or safely and securely managed. Military components can therefore assist in performing the following disarmament-related tasks, which should include a gender-perspective in their planning and execution: \\n Monitoring the separation of forces. \\n Monitoring troop withdrawal from agreed-upon areas. \\n Manning reception centres. \\n Undertaking identification and physical checks of weapons. \\n Collection, registration and identification of weapons, ammunition and explosives. \\n Registration of male and female ex-combatants and associated groups.", + "Paragraph": "Military components may possess ammunition and weapons expertise useful for the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Disarmament typically involves the collection, documentation (registration), identification, storage, and disposal (including destruction) of conventional arms and ammunition (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). Depending on the methods agreed in peace agreements and plans for future national security forces, weapons and ammunition will either be destroyed or safely and securely managed. Military components can therefore assist in performing the following disarmament-related tasks, which should include a gender-perspective in their planning and execution: \n Monitoring the separation of forces. \n Monitoring troop withdrawal from agreed-upon areas. \n Manning reception centres. \n Undertaking identification and physical checks of weapons. \n Collection, registration and identification of weapons, ammunition and explosives. \n Registration of male and female ex-combatants and associated groups.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -107832,14 +107832,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Military component contribution", "Heading3": "5.3.2 Disarmament", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Military components can therefore assist in performing the following disarmament-related tasks, which should include a gender-perspective in their planning and execution: \\n Monitoring the separation of forces.", + "Sentence": "Military components can therefore assist in performing the following disarmament-related tasks, which should include a gender-perspective in their planning and execution: \n Monitoring the separation of forces.", "newParagraph": "military component may posse ammunition weapon expertise useful disarmament phase ddr programme disarmament typically involves collection documentation registration identification storage disposal including destruction conventional arm ammunition see iddrs 410 disarmament depending method agreed peace agreement plan future national security force weapon ammunition either destroyed safely securely managed military component therefore assist performing following disarmamentrelated task include genderperspective planning execution n monitoring separation force n monitoring troop withdrawal agreedupon area n manning reception centre n undertaking identification physical check weapon n collection registration identification weapon ammunition explosive n registration male female excombatants associated group", "ProcessedSent": "military component therefore assist performing following disarmamentrelated task include genderperspective planning execution n monitoring separation force", "SentID": 5990 }, { "ParagraphID": 1849, - "Paragraph": "Military components may possess ammunition and weapons expertise useful for the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Disarmament typically involves the collection, documentation (registration), identification, storage, and disposal (including destruction) of conventional arms and ammunition (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). Depending on the methods agreed in peace agreements and plans for future national security forces, weapons and ammunition will either be destroyed or safely and securely managed. Military components can therefore assist in performing the following disarmament-related tasks, which should include a gender-perspective in their planning and execution: \\n Monitoring the separation of forces. \\n Monitoring troop withdrawal from agreed-upon areas. \\n Manning reception centres. \\n Undertaking identification and physical checks of weapons. \\n Collection, registration and identification of weapons, ammunition and explosives. \\n Registration of male and female ex-combatants and associated groups.", + "Paragraph": "Military components may possess ammunition and weapons expertise useful for the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Disarmament typically involves the collection, documentation (registration), identification, storage, and disposal (including destruction) of conventional arms and ammunition (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). Depending on the methods agreed in peace agreements and plans for future national security forces, weapons and ammunition will either be destroyed or safely and securely managed. Military components can therefore assist in performing the following disarmament-related tasks, which should include a gender-perspective in their planning and execution: \n Monitoring the separation of forces. \n Monitoring troop withdrawal from agreed-upon areas. \n Manning reception centres. \n Undertaking identification and physical checks of weapons. \n Collection, registration and identification of weapons, ammunition and explosives. \n Registration of male and female ex-combatants and associated groups.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -107850,14 +107850,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Military component contribution", "Heading3": "5.3.2 Disarmament", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Monitoring troop withdrawal from agreed-upon areas.", + "Sentence": "\n Monitoring troop withdrawal from agreed-upon areas.", "newParagraph": "military component may posse ammunition weapon expertise useful disarmament phase ddr programme disarmament typically involves collection documentation registration identification storage disposal including destruction conventional arm ammunition see iddrs 410 disarmament depending method agreed peace agreement plan future national security force weapon ammunition either destroyed safely securely managed military component therefore assist performing following disarmamentrelated task include genderperspective planning execution n monitoring separation force n monitoring troop withdrawal agreedupon area n manning reception centre n undertaking identification physical check weapon n collection registration identification weapon ammunition explosive n registration male female excombatants associated group", "ProcessedSent": "n monitoring troop withdrawal agreedupon area", "SentID": 5991 }, { "ParagraphID": 1849, - "Paragraph": "Military components may possess ammunition and weapons expertise useful for the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Disarmament typically involves the collection, documentation (registration), identification, storage, and disposal (including destruction) of conventional arms and ammunition (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). Depending on the methods agreed in peace agreements and plans for future national security forces, weapons and ammunition will either be destroyed or safely and securely managed. Military components can therefore assist in performing the following disarmament-related tasks, which should include a gender-perspective in their planning and execution: \\n Monitoring the separation of forces. \\n Monitoring troop withdrawal from agreed-upon areas. \\n Manning reception centres. \\n Undertaking identification and physical checks of weapons. \\n Collection, registration and identification of weapons, ammunition and explosives. \\n Registration of male and female ex-combatants and associated groups.", + "Paragraph": "Military components may possess ammunition and weapons expertise useful for the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Disarmament typically involves the collection, documentation (registration), identification, storage, and disposal (including destruction) of conventional arms and ammunition (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). Depending on the methods agreed in peace agreements and plans for future national security forces, weapons and ammunition will either be destroyed or safely and securely managed. Military components can therefore assist in performing the following disarmament-related tasks, which should include a gender-perspective in their planning and execution: \n Monitoring the separation of forces. \n Monitoring troop withdrawal from agreed-upon areas. \n Manning reception centres. \n Undertaking identification and physical checks of weapons. \n Collection, registration and identification of weapons, ammunition and explosives. \n Registration of male and female ex-combatants and associated groups.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -107868,14 +107868,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Military component contribution", "Heading3": "5.3.2 Disarmament", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Manning reception centres.", + "Sentence": "\n Manning reception centres.", "newParagraph": "military component may posse ammunition weapon expertise useful disarmament phase ddr programme disarmament typically involves collection documentation registration identification storage disposal including destruction conventional arm ammunition see iddrs 410 disarmament depending method agreed peace agreement plan future national security force weapon ammunition either destroyed safely securely managed military component therefore assist performing following disarmamentrelated task include genderperspective planning execution n monitoring separation force n monitoring troop withdrawal agreedupon area n manning reception centre n undertaking identification physical check weapon n collection registration identification weapon ammunition explosive n registration male female excombatants associated group", "ProcessedSent": "n manning reception centre", "SentID": 5992 }, { "ParagraphID": 1849, - "Paragraph": "Military components may possess ammunition and weapons expertise useful for the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Disarmament typically involves the collection, documentation (registration), identification, storage, and disposal (including destruction) of conventional arms and ammunition (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). Depending on the methods agreed in peace agreements and plans for future national security forces, weapons and ammunition will either be destroyed or safely and securely managed. Military components can therefore assist in performing the following disarmament-related tasks, which should include a gender-perspective in their planning and execution: \\n Monitoring the separation of forces. \\n Monitoring troop withdrawal from agreed-upon areas. \\n Manning reception centres. \\n Undertaking identification and physical checks of weapons. \\n Collection, registration and identification of weapons, ammunition and explosives. \\n Registration of male and female ex-combatants and associated groups.", + "Paragraph": "Military components may possess ammunition and weapons expertise useful for the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Disarmament typically involves the collection, documentation (registration), identification, storage, and disposal (including destruction) of conventional arms and ammunition (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). Depending on the methods agreed in peace agreements and plans for future national security forces, weapons and ammunition will either be destroyed or safely and securely managed. Military components can therefore assist in performing the following disarmament-related tasks, which should include a gender-perspective in their planning and execution: \n Monitoring the separation of forces. \n Monitoring troop withdrawal from agreed-upon areas. \n Manning reception centres. \n Undertaking identification and physical checks of weapons. \n Collection, registration and identification of weapons, ammunition and explosives. \n Registration of male and female ex-combatants and associated groups.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -107886,14 +107886,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Military component contribution", "Heading3": "5.3.2 Disarmament", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Undertaking identification and physical checks of weapons.", + "Sentence": "\n Undertaking identification and physical checks of weapons.", "newParagraph": "military component may posse ammunition weapon expertise useful disarmament phase ddr programme disarmament typically involves collection documentation registration identification storage disposal including destruction conventional arm ammunition see iddrs 410 disarmament depending method agreed peace agreement plan future national security force weapon ammunition either destroyed safely securely managed military component therefore assist performing following disarmamentrelated task include genderperspective planning execution n monitoring separation force n monitoring troop withdrawal agreedupon area n manning reception centre n undertaking identification physical check weapon n collection registration identification weapon ammunition explosive n registration male female excombatants associated group", "ProcessedSent": "n undertaking identification physical check weapon", "SentID": 5993 }, { "ParagraphID": 1849, - "Paragraph": "Military components may possess ammunition and weapons expertise useful for the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Disarmament typically involves the collection, documentation (registration), identification, storage, and disposal (including destruction) of conventional arms and ammunition (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). Depending on the methods agreed in peace agreements and plans for future national security forces, weapons and ammunition will either be destroyed or safely and securely managed. Military components can therefore assist in performing the following disarmament-related tasks, which should include a gender-perspective in their planning and execution: \\n Monitoring the separation of forces. \\n Monitoring troop withdrawal from agreed-upon areas. \\n Manning reception centres. \\n Undertaking identification and physical checks of weapons. \\n Collection, registration and identification of weapons, ammunition and explosives. \\n Registration of male and female ex-combatants and associated groups.", + "Paragraph": "Military components may possess ammunition and weapons expertise useful for the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Disarmament typically involves the collection, documentation (registration), identification, storage, and disposal (including destruction) of conventional arms and ammunition (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). Depending on the methods agreed in peace agreements and plans for future national security forces, weapons and ammunition will either be destroyed or safely and securely managed. Military components can therefore assist in performing the following disarmament-related tasks, which should include a gender-perspective in their planning and execution: \n Monitoring the separation of forces. \n Monitoring troop withdrawal from agreed-upon areas. \n Manning reception centres. \n Undertaking identification and physical checks of weapons. \n Collection, registration and identification of weapons, ammunition and explosives. \n Registration of male and female ex-combatants and associated groups.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -107904,14 +107904,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Military component contribution", "Heading3": "5.3.2 Disarmament", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Collection, registration and identification of weapons, ammunition and explosives.", + "Sentence": "\n Collection, registration and identification of weapons, ammunition and explosives.", "newParagraph": "military component may posse ammunition weapon expertise useful disarmament phase ddr programme disarmament typically involves collection documentation registration identification storage disposal including destruction conventional arm ammunition see iddrs 410 disarmament depending method agreed peace agreement plan future national security force weapon ammunition either destroyed safely securely managed military component therefore assist performing following disarmamentrelated task include genderperspective planning execution n monitoring separation force n monitoring troop withdrawal agreedupon area n manning reception centre n undertaking identification physical check weapon n collection registration identification weapon ammunition explosive n registration male female excombatants associated group", "ProcessedSent": "n collection registration identification weapon ammunition explosive", "SentID": 5994 }, { "ParagraphID": 1849, - "Paragraph": "Military components may possess ammunition and weapons expertise useful for the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Disarmament typically involves the collection, documentation (registration), identification, storage, and disposal (including destruction) of conventional arms and ammunition (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). Depending on the methods agreed in peace agreements and plans for future national security forces, weapons and ammunition will either be destroyed or safely and securely managed. Military components can therefore assist in performing the following disarmament-related tasks, which should include a gender-perspective in their planning and execution: \\n Monitoring the separation of forces. \\n Monitoring troop withdrawal from agreed-upon areas. \\n Manning reception centres. \\n Undertaking identification and physical checks of weapons. \\n Collection, registration and identification of weapons, ammunition and explosives. \\n Registration of male and female ex-combatants and associated groups.", + "Paragraph": "Military components may possess ammunition and weapons expertise useful for the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Disarmament typically involves the collection, documentation (registration), identification, storage, and disposal (including destruction) of conventional arms and ammunition (see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament). Depending on the methods agreed in peace agreements and plans for future national security forces, weapons and ammunition will either be destroyed or safely and securely managed. Military components can therefore assist in performing the following disarmament-related tasks, which should include a gender-perspective in their planning and execution: \n Monitoring the separation of forces. \n Monitoring troop withdrawal from agreed-upon areas. \n Manning reception centres. \n Undertaking identification and physical checks of weapons. \n Collection, registration and identification of weapons, ammunition and explosives. \n Registration of male and female ex-combatants and associated groups.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -107922,7 +107922,7 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Military component contribution", "Heading3": "5.3.2 Disarmament", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Registration of male and female ex-combatants and associated groups.", + "Sentence": "\n Registration of male and female ex-combatants and associated groups.", "newParagraph": "military component may posse ammunition weapon expertise useful disarmament phase ddr programme disarmament typically involves collection documentation registration identification storage disposal including destruction conventional arm ammunition see iddrs 410 disarmament depending method agreed peace agreement plan future national security force weapon ammunition either destroyed safely securely managed military component therefore assist performing following disarmamentrelated task include genderperspective planning execution n monitoring separation force n monitoring troop withdrawal agreedupon area n manning reception centre n undertaking identification physical check weapon n collection registration identification weapon ammunition explosive n registration male female excombatants associated group", "ProcessedSent": "n registration male female excombatants associated group", "SentID": 5995 @@ -108055,7 +108055,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1852, - "Paragraph": "The DDR component of the mission should coordinate and manage information gathering and reporting tasks, with supplementary information provided by the Joint Operations Centre (JOC) and Joint Mission Analysis Centre (JMAC). The military component can seek information on the following: \\n The locations, sex- and age-disaggregated troop strengths, and intentions of former combatants or associated groups, who may or will become part of a DDR process. \\n Estimates of the number\/type of weapons and ammunition expected to be collected\/stored during a DDR process, including those held by women and children. As accurate estimates may be difficult to achieve, planning for disarmament and broader transitional WAM must include some flexibility. \\n Sex- and age-disaggregated estimates of non-combatants associated with the armed forces, including women, children, and elderly or wounded\/disabled people. Their roles and responsibilities should also be identified, particularly if human trafficking, slavery, and\/or sexual and gender-based violence is suspected. \\n Information from UN system organizations, NGOs, and women\u2019s and youth groups. \\n\\n The information-gathering process can be a specific task of the military component, but it can also be a by-product of its normal operations, e.g., information gathered by patrols and the activities of MILOBs. Previous experience has shown that the leaders of armed groups often withhold or distort information related to DDR, particularly when communicating with the rank and file. Military components can be used to detect whether this is happening and can assist in dealing with this challenge as part of the public information and sensitization campaigns associated with DDR (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR).", + "Paragraph": "The DDR component of the mission should coordinate and manage information gathering and reporting tasks, with supplementary information provided by the Joint Operations Centre (JOC) and Joint Mission Analysis Centre (JMAC). The military component can seek information on the following: \n The locations, sex- and age-disaggregated troop strengths, and intentions of former combatants or associated groups, who may or will become part of a DDR process. \n Estimates of the number\/type of weapons and ammunition expected to be collected\/stored during a DDR process, including those held by women and children. As accurate estimates may be difficult to achieve, planning for disarmament and broader transitional WAM must include some flexibility. \n Sex- and age-disaggregated estimates of non-combatants associated with the armed forces, including women, children, and elderly or wounded\/disabled people. Their roles and responsibilities should also be identified, particularly if human trafficking, slavery, and\/or sexual and gender-based violence is suspected. \n Information from UN system organizations, NGOs, and women\u2019s and youth groups. \n\n The information-gathering process can be a specific task of the military component, but it can also be a by-product of its normal operations, e.g., information gathered by patrols and the activities of MILOBs. Previous experience has shown that the leaders of armed groups often withhold or distort information related to DDR, particularly when communicating with the rank and file. Military components can be used to detect whether this is happening and can assist in dealing with this challenge as part of the public information and sensitization campaigns associated with DDR (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -108073,7 +108073,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1852, - "Paragraph": "The DDR component of the mission should coordinate and manage information gathering and reporting tasks, with supplementary information provided by the Joint Operations Centre (JOC) and Joint Mission Analysis Centre (JMAC). The military component can seek information on the following: \\n The locations, sex- and age-disaggregated troop strengths, and intentions of former combatants or associated groups, who may or will become part of a DDR process. \\n Estimates of the number\/type of weapons and ammunition expected to be collected\/stored during a DDR process, including those held by women and children. As accurate estimates may be difficult to achieve, planning for disarmament and broader transitional WAM must include some flexibility. \\n Sex- and age-disaggregated estimates of non-combatants associated with the armed forces, including women, children, and elderly or wounded\/disabled people. Their roles and responsibilities should also be identified, particularly if human trafficking, slavery, and\/or sexual and gender-based violence is suspected. \\n Information from UN system organizations, NGOs, and women\u2019s and youth groups. \\n\\n The information-gathering process can be a specific task of the military component, but it can also be a by-product of its normal operations, e.g., information gathered by patrols and the activities of MILOBs. Previous experience has shown that the leaders of armed groups often withhold or distort information related to DDR, particularly when communicating with the rank and file. Military components can be used to detect whether this is happening and can assist in dealing with this challenge as part of the public information and sensitization campaigns associated with DDR (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR).", + "Paragraph": "The DDR component of the mission should coordinate and manage information gathering and reporting tasks, with supplementary information provided by the Joint Operations Centre (JOC) and Joint Mission Analysis Centre (JMAC). The military component can seek information on the following: \n The locations, sex- and age-disaggregated troop strengths, and intentions of former combatants or associated groups, who may or will become part of a DDR process. \n Estimates of the number\/type of weapons and ammunition expected to be collected\/stored during a DDR process, including those held by women and children. As accurate estimates may be difficult to achieve, planning for disarmament and broader transitional WAM must include some flexibility. \n Sex- and age-disaggregated estimates of non-combatants associated with the armed forces, including women, children, and elderly or wounded\/disabled people. Their roles and responsibilities should also be identified, particularly if human trafficking, slavery, and\/or sexual and gender-based violence is suspected. \n Information from UN system organizations, NGOs, and women\u2019s and youth groups. \n\n The information-gathering process can be a specific task of the military component, but it can also be a by-product of its normal operations, e.g., information gathered by patrols and the activities of MILOBs. Previous experience has shown that the leaders of armed groups often withhold or distort information related to DDR, particularly when communicating with the rank and file. Military components can be used to detect whether this is happening and can assist in dealing with this challenge as part of the public information and sensitization campaigns associated with DDR (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -108084,14 +108084,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Military component contribution", "Heading3": "5.3.4 Information gathering and reporting", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The military component can seek information on the following: \\n The locations, sex- and age-disaggregated troop strengths, and intentions of former combatants or associated groups, who may or will become part of a DDR process.", + "Sentence": "The military component can seek information on the following: \n The locations, sex- and age-disaggregated troop strengths, and intentions of former combatants or associated groups, who may or will become part of a DDR process.", "newParagraph": "ddr component mission coordinate manage information gathering reporting task supplementary information provided joint operation centre joc joint mission analysis centre jmac military component seek information following n location sex agedisaggregated troop strength intention former combatant associated group may become part ddr process n estimate numbertype weapon ammunition expected collectedstored ddr process including held woman child accurate estimate may difficult achieve planning disarmament broader transitional wam must include flexibility n sex agedisaggregated estimate noncombatant associated armed force including woman child elderly woundeddisabled people role responsibility also identified particularly human trafficking slavery andor sexual genderbased violence suspected n information un system organization ngo woman youth group nn informationgathering process specific task military component also byproduct normal operation eg information gathered patrol activity milobs previous experience shown leader armed group often withhold distort information related ddr particularly communicating rank file military component used detect whether happening assist dealing challenge part public information sensitization campaign associated ddr see iddrs 460 public information strategic communication support ddr", "ProcessedSent": "military component seek information following n location sex agedisaggregated troop strength intention former combatant associated group may become part ddr process", "SentID": 6004 }, { "ParagraphID": 1852, - "Paragraph": "The DDR component of the mission should coordinate and manage information gathering and reporting tasks, with supplementary information provided by the Joint Operations Centre (JOC) and Joint Mission Analysis Centre (JMAC). The military component can seek information on the following: \\n The locations, sex- and age-disaggregated troop strengths, and intentions of former combatants or associated groups, who may or will become part of a DDR process. \\n Estimates of the number\/type of weapons and ammunition expected to be collected\/stored during a DDR process, including those held by women and children. As accurate estimates may be difficult to achieve, planning for disarmament and broader transitional WAM must include some flexibility. \\n Sex- and age-disaggregated estimates of non-combatants associated with the armed forces, including women, children, and elderly or wounded\/disabled people. Their roles and responsibilities should also be identified, particularly if human trafficking, slavery, and\/or sexual and gender-based violence is suspected. \\n Information from UN system organizations, NGOs, and women\u2019s and youth groups. \\n\\n The information-gathering process can be a specific task of the military component, but it can also be a by-product of its normal operations, e.g., information gathered by patrols and the activities of MILOBs. Previous experience has shown that the leaders of armed groups often withhold or distort information related to DDR, particularly when communicating with the rank and file. Military components can be used to detect whether this is happening and can assist in dealing with this challenge as part of the public information and sensitization campaigns associated with DDR (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR).", + "Paragraph": "The DDR component of the mission should coordinate and manage information gathering and reporting tasks, with supplementary information provided by the Joint Operations Centre (JOC) and Joint Mission Analysis Centre (JMAC). The military component can seek information on the following: \n The locations, sex- and age-disaggregated troop strengths, and intentions of former combatants or associated groups, who may or will become part of a DDR process. \n Estimates of the number\/type of weapons and ammunition expected to be collected\/stored during a DDR process, including those held by women and children. As accurate estimates may be difficult to achieve, planning for disarmament and broader transitional WAM must include some flexibility. \n Sex- and age-disaggregated estimates of non-combatants associated with the armed forces, including women, children, and elderly or wounded\/disabled people. Their roles and responsibilities should also be identified, particularly if human trafficking, slavery, and\/or sexual and gender-based violence is suspected. \n Information from UN system organizations, NGOs, and women\u2019s and youth groups. \n\n The information-gathering process can be a specific task of the military component, but it can also be a by-product of its normal operations, e.g., information gathered by patrols and the activities of MILOBs. Previous experience has shown that the leaders of armed groups often withhold or distort information related to DDR, particularly when communicating with the rank and file. Military components can be used to detect whether this is happening and can assist in dealing with this challenge as part of the public information and sensitization campaigns associated with DDR (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -108102,14 +108102,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Military component contribution", "Heading3": "5.3.4 Information gathering and reporting", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Estimates of the number\/type of weapons and ammunition expected to be collected\/stored during a DDR process, including those held by women and children.", + "Sentence": "\n Estimates of the number\/type of weapons and ammunition expected to be collected\/stored during a DDR process, including those held by women and children.", "newParagraph": "ddr component mission coordinate manage information gathering reporting task supplementary information provided joint operation centre joc joint mission analysis centre jmac military component seek information following n location sex agedisaggregated troop strength intention former combatant associated group may become part ddr process n estimate numbertype weapon ammunition expected collectedstored ddr process including held woman child accurate estimate may difficult achieve planning disarmament broader transitional wam must include flexibility n sex agedisaggregated estimate noncombatant associated armed force including woman child elderly woundeddisabled people role responsibility also identified particularly human trafficking slavery andor sexual genderbased violence suspected n information un system organization ngo woman youth group nn informationgathering process specific task military component also byproduct normal operation eg information gathered patrol activity milobs previous experience shown leader armed group often withhold distort information related ddr particularly communicating rank file military component used detect whether happening assist dealing challenge part public information sensitization campaign associated ddr see iddrs 460 public information strategic communication support ddr", "ProcessedSent": "n estimate numbertype weapon ammunition expected collectedstored ddr process including held woman child", "SentID": 6005 }, { "ParagraphID": 1852, - "Paragraph": "The DDR component of the mission should coordinate and manage information gathering and reporting tasks, with supplementary information provided by the Joint Operations Centre (JOC) and Joint Mission Analysis Centre (JMAC). The military component can seek information on the following: \\n The locations, sex- and age-disaggregated troop strengths, and intentions of former combatants or associated groups, who may or will become part of a DDR process. \\n Estimates of the number\/type of weapons and ammunition expected to be collected\/stored during a DDR process, including those held by women and children. As accurate estimates may be difficult to achieve, planning for disarmament and broader transitional WAM must include some flexibility. \\n Sex- and age-disaggregated estimates of non-combatants associated with the armed forces, including women, children, and elderly or wounded\/disabled people. Their roles and responsibilities should also be identified, particularly if human trafficking, slavery, and\/or sexual and gender-based violence is suspected. \\n Information from UN system organizations, NGOs, and women\u2019s and youth groups. \\n\\n The information-gathering process can be a specific task of the military component, but it can also be a by-product of its normal operations, e.g., information gathered by patrols and the activities of MILOBs. Previous experience has shown that the leaders of armed groups often withhold or distort information related to DDR, particularly when communicating with the rank and file. Military components can be used to detect whether this is happening and can assist in dealing with this challenge as part of the public information and sensitization campaigns associated with DDR (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR).", + "Paragraph": "The DDR component of the mission should coordinate and manage information gathering and reporting tasks, with supplementary information provided by the Joint Operations Centre (JOC) and Joint Mission Analysis Centre (JMAC). The military component can seek information on the following: \n The locations, sex- and age-disaggregated troop strengths, and intentions of former combatants or associated groups, who may or will become part of a DDR process. \n Estimates of the number\/type of weapons and ammunition expected to be collected\/stored during a DDR process, including those held by women and children. As accurate estimates may be difficult to achieve, planning for disarmament and broader transitional WAM must include some flexibility. \n Sex- and age-disaggregated estimates of non-combatants associated with the armed forces, including women, children, and elderly or wounded\/disabled people. Their roles and responsibilities should also be identified, particularly if human trafficking, slavery, and\/or sexual and gender-based violence is suspected. \n Information from UN system organizations, NGOs, and women\u2019s and youth groups. \n\n The information-gathering process can be a specific task of the military component, but it can also be a by-product of its normal operations, e.g., information gathered by patrols and the activities of MILOBs. Previous experience has shown that the leaders of armed groups often withhold or distort information related to DDR, particularly when communicating with the rank and file. Military components can be used to detect whether this is happening and can assist in dealing with this challenge as part of the public information and sensitization campaigns associated with DDR (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -108127,7 +108127,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1852, - "Paragraph": "The DDR component of the mission should coordinate and manage information gathering and reporting tasks, with supplementary information provided by the Joint Operations Centre (JOC) and Joint Mission Analysis Centre (JMAC). The military component can seek information on the following: \\n The locations, sex- and age-disaggregated troop strengths, and intentions of former combatants or associated groups, who may or will become part of a DDR process. \\n Estimates of the number\/type of weapons and ammunition expected to be collected\/stored during a DDR process, including those held by women and children. As accurate estimates may be difficult to achieve, planning for disarmament and broader transitional WAM must include some flexibility. \\n Sex- and age-disaggregated estimates of non-combatants associated with the armed forces, including women, children, and elderly or wounded\/disabled people. Their roles and responsibilities should also be identified, particularly if human trafficking, slavery, and\/or sexual and gender-based violence is suspected. \\n Information from UN system organizations, NGOs, and women\u2019s and youth groups. \\n\\n The information-gathering process can be a specific task of the military component, but it can also be a by-product of its normal operations, e.g., information gathered by patrols and the activities of MILOBs. Previous experience has shown that the leaders of armed groups often withhold or distort information related to DDR, particularly when communicating with the rank and file. Military components can be used to detect whether this is happening and can assist in dealing with this challenge as part of the public information and sensitization campaigns associated with DDR (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR).", + "Paragraph": "The DDR component of the mission should coordinate and manage information gathering and reporting tasks, with supplementary information provided by the Joint Operations Centre (JOC) and Joint Mission Analysis Centre (JMAC). The military component can seek information on the following: \n The locations, sex- and age-disaggregated troop strengths, and intentions of former combatants or associated groups, who may or will become part of a DDR process. \n Estimates of the number\/type of weapons and ammunition expected to be collected\/stored during a DDR process, including those held by women and children. As accurate estimates may be difficult to achieve, planning for disarmament and broader transitional WAM must include some flexibility. \n Sex- and age-disaggregated estimates of non-combatants associated with the armed forces, including women, children, and elderly or wounded\/disabled people. Their roles and responsibilities should also be identified, particularly if human trafficking, slavery, and\/or sexual and gender-based violence is suspected. \n Information from UN system organizations, NGOs, and women\u2019s and youth groups. \n\n The information-gathering process can be a specific task of the military component, but it can also be a by-product of its normal operations, e.g., information gathered by patrols and the activities of MILOBs. Previous experience has shown that the leaders of armed groups often withhold or distort information related to DDR, particularly when communicating with the rank and file. Military components can be used to detect whether this is happening and can assist in dealing with this challenge as part of the public information and sensitization campaigns associated with DDR (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -108138,14 +108138,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Military component contribution", "Heading3": "5.3.4 Information gathering and reporting", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Sex- and age-disaggregated estimates of non-combatants associated with the armed forces, including women, children, and elderly or wounded\/disabled people.", + "Sentence": "\n Sex- and age-disaggregated estimates of non-combatants associated with the armed forces, including women, children, and elderly or wounded\/disabled people.", "newParagraph": "ddr component mission coordinate manage information gathering reporting task supplementary information provided joint operation centre joc joint mission analysis centre jmac military component seek information following n location sex agedisaggregated troop strength intention former combatant associated group may become part ddr process n estimate numbertype weapon ammunition expected collectedstored ddr process including held woman child accurate estimate may difficult achieve planning disarmament broader transitional wam must include flexibility n sex agedisaggregated estimate noncombatant associated armed force including woman child elderly woundeddisabled people role responsibility also identified particularly human trafficking slavery andor sexual genderbased violence suspected n information un system organization ngo woman youth group nn informationgathering process specific task military component also byproduct normal operation eg information gathered patrol activity milobs previous experience shown leader armed group often withhold distort information related ddr particularly communicating rank file military component used detect whether happening assist dealing challenge part public information sensitization campaign associated ddr see iddrs 460 public information strategic communication support ddr", "ProcessedSent": "n sex agedisaggregated estimate noncombatant associated armed force including woman child elderly woundeddisabled people", "SentID": 6007 }, { "ParagraphID": 1852, - "Paragraph": "The DDR component of the mission should coordinate and manage information gathering and reporting tasks, with supplementary information provided by the Joint Operations Centre (JOC) and Joint Mission Analysis Centre (JMAC). The military component can seek information on the following: \\n The locations, sex- and age-disaggregated troop strengths, and intentions of former combatants or associated groups, who may or will become part of a DDR process. \\n Estimates of the number\/type of weapons and ammunition expected to be collected\/stored during a DDR process, including those held by women and children. As accurate estimates may be difficult to achieve, planning for disarmament and broader transitional WAM must include some flexibility. \\n Sex- and age-disaggregated estimates of non-combatants associated with the armed forces, including women, children, and elderly or wounded\/disabled people. Their roles and responsibilities should also be identified, particularly if human trafficking, slavery, and\/or sexual and gender-based violence is suspected. \\n Information from UN system organizations, NGOs, and women\u2019s and youth groups. \\n\\n The information-gathering process can be a specific task of the military component, but it can also be a by-product of its normal operations, e.g., information gathered by patrols and the activities of MILOBs. Previous experience has shown that the leaders of armed groups often withhold or distort information related to DDR, particularly when communicating with the rank and file. Military components can be used to detect whether this is happening and can assist in dealing with this challenge as part of the public information and sensitization campaigns associated with DDR (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR).", + "Paragraph": "The DDR component of the mission should coordinate and manage information gathering and reporting tasks, with supplementary information provided by the Joint Operations Centre (JOC) and Joint Mission Analysis Centre (JMAC). The military component can seek information on the following: \n The locations, sex- and age-disaggregated troop strengths, and intentions of former combatants or associated groups, who may or will become part of a DDR process. \n Estimates of the number\/type of weapons and ammunition expected to be collected\/stored during a DDR process, including those held by women and children. As accurate estimates may be difficult to achieve, planning for disarmament and broader transitional WAM must include some flexibility. \n Sex- and age-disaggregated estimates of non-combatants associated with the armed forces, including women, children, and elderly or wounded\/disabled people. Their roles and responsibilities should also be identified, particularly if human trafficking, slavery, and\/or sexual and gender-based violence is suspected. \n Information from UN system organizations, NGOs, and women\u2019s and youth groups. \n\n The information-gathering process can be a specific task of the military component, but it can also be a by-product of its normal operations, e.g., information gathered by patrols and the activities of MILOBs. Previous experience has shown that the leaders of armed groups often withhold or distort information related to DDR, particularly when communicating with the rank and file. Military components can be used to detect whether this is happening and can assist in dealing with this challenge as part of the public information and sensitization campaigns associated with DDR (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -108163,7 +108163,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1852, - "Paragraph": "The DDR component of the mission should coordinate and manage information gathering and reporting tasks, with supplementary information provided by the Joint Operations Centre (JOC) and Joint Mission Analysis Centre (JMAC). The military component can seek information on the following: \\n The locations, sex- and age-disaggregated troop strengths, and intentions of former combatants or associated groups, who may or will become part of a DDR process. \\n Estimates of the number\/type of weapons and ammunition expected to be collected\/stored during a DDR process, including those held by women and children. As accurate estimates may be difficult to achieve, planning for disarmament and broader transitional WAM must include some flexibility. \\n Sex- and age-disaggregated estimates of non-combatants associated with the armed forces, including women, children, and elderly or wounded\/disabled people. Their roles and responsibilities should also be identified, particularly if human trafficking, slavery, and\/or sexual and gender-based violence is suspected. \\n Information from UN system organizations, NGOs, and women\u2019s and youth groups. \\n\\n The information-gathering process can be a specific task of the military component, but it can also be a by-product of its normal operations, e.g., information gathered by patrols and the activities of MILOBs. Previous experience has shown that the leaders of armed groups often withhold or distort information related to DDR, particularly when communicating with the rank and file. Military components can be used to detect whether this is happening and can assist in dealing with this challenge as part of the public information and sensitization campaigns associated with DDR (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR).", + "Paragraph": "The DDR component of the mission should coordinate and manage information gathering and reporting tasks, with supplementary information provided by the Joint Operations Centre (JOC) and Joint Mission Analysis Centre (JMAC). The military component can seek information on the following: \n The locations, sex- and age-disaggregated troop strengths, and intentions of former combatants or associated groups, who may or will become part of a DDR process. \n Estimates of the number\/type of weapons and ammunition expected to be collected\/stored during a DDR process, including those held by women and children. As accurate estimates may be difficult to achieve, planning for disarmament and broader transitional WAM must include some flexibility. \n Sex- and age-disaggregated estimates of non-combatants associated with the armed forces, including women, children, and elderly or wounded\/disabled people. Their roles and responsibilities should also be identified, particularly if human trafficking, slavery, and\/or sexual and gender-based violence is suspected. \n Information from UN system organizations, NGOs, and women\u2019s and youth groups. \n\n The information-gathering process can be a specific task of the military component, but it can also be a by-product of its normal operations, e.g., information gathered by patrols and the activities of MILOBs. Previous experience has shown that the leaders of armed groups often withhold or distort information related to DDR, particularly when communicating with the rank and file. Military components can be used to detect whether this is happening and can assist in dealing with this challenge as part of the public information and sensitization campaigns associated with DDR (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -108174,14 +108174,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Military component contribution", "Heading3": "5.3.4 Information gathering and reporting", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Information from UN system organizations, NGOs, and women\u2019s and youth groups.", + "Sentence": "\n Information from UN system organizations, NGOs, and women\u2019s and youth groups.", "newParagraph": "ddr component mission coordinate manage information gathering reporting task supplementary information provided joint operation centre joc joint mission analysis centre jmac military component seek information following n location sex agedisaggregated troop strength intention former combatant associated group may become part ddr process n estimate numbertype weapon ammunition expected collectedstored ddr process including held woman child accurate estimate may difficult achieve planning disarmament broader transitional wam must include flexibility n sex agedisaggregated estimate noncombatant associated armed force including woman child elderly woundeddisabled people role responsibility also identified particularly human trafficking slavery andor sexual genderbased violence suspected n information un system organization ngo woman youth group nn informationgathering process specific task military component also byproduct normal operation eg information gathered patrol activity milobs previous experience shown leader armed group often withhold distort information related ddr particularly communicating rank file military component used detect whether happening assist dealing challenge part public information sensitization campaign associated ddr see iddrs 460 public information strategic communication support ddr", "ProcessedSent": "n information un system organization ngo woman youth group", "SentID": 6009 }, { "ParagraphID": 1852, - "Paragraph": "The DDR component of the mission should coordinate and manage information gathering and reporting tasks, with supplementary information provided by the Joint Operations Centre (JOC) and Joint Mission Analysis Centre (JMAC). The military component can seek information on the following: \\n The locations, sex- and age-disaggregated troop strengths, and intentions of former combatants or associated groups, who may or will become part of a DDR process. \\n Estimates of the number\/type of weapons and ammunition expected to be collected\/stored during a DDR process, including those held by women and children. As accurate estimates may be difficult to achieve, planning for disarmament and broader transitional WAM must include some flexibility. \\n Sex- and age-disaggregated estimates of non-combatants associated with the armed forces, including women, children, and elderly or wounded\/disabled people. Their roles and responsibilities should also be identified, particularly if human trafficking, slavery, and\/or sexual and gender-based violence is suspected. \\n Information from UN system organizations, NGOs, and women\u2019s and youth groups. \\n\\n The information-gathering process can be a specific task of the military component, but it can also be a by-product of its normal operations, e.g., information gathered by patrols and the activities of MILOBs. Previous experience has shown that the leaders of armed groups often withhold or distort information related to DDR, particularly when communicating with the rank and file. Military components can be used to detect whether this is happening and can assist in dealing with this challenge as part of the public information and sensitization campaigns associated with DDR (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR).", + "Paragraph": "The DDR component of the mission should coordinate and manage information gathering and reporting tasks, with supplementary information provided by the Joint Operations Centre (JOC) and Joint Mission Analysis Centre (JMAC). The military component can seek information on the following: \n The locations, sex- and age-disaggregated troop strengths, and intentions of former combatants or associated groups, who may or will become part of a DDR process. \n Estimates of the number\/type of weapons and ammunition expected to be collected\/stored during a DDR process, including those held by women and children. As accurate estimates may be difficult to achieve, planning for disarmament and broader transitional WAM must include some flexibility. \n Sex- and age-disaggregated estimates of non-combatants associated with the armed forces, including women, children, and elderly or wounded\/disabled people. Their roles and responsibilities should also be identified, particularly if human trafficking, slavery, and\/or sexual and gender-based violence is suspected. \n Information from UN system organizations, NGOs, and women\u2019s and youth groups. \n\n The information-gathering process can be a specific task of the military component, but it can also be a by-product of its normal operations, e.g., information gathered by patrols and the activities of MILOBs. Previous experience has shown that the leaders of armed groups often withhold or distort information related to DDR, particularly when communicating with the rank and file. Military components can be used to detect whether this is happening and can assist in dealing with this challenge as part of the public information and sensitization campaigns associated with DDR (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -108192,14 +108192,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.3 Military component contribution", "Heading3": "5.3.4 Information gathering and reporting", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n The information-gathering process can be a specific task of the military component, but it can also be a by-product of its normal operations, e.g., information gathered by patrols and the activities of MILOBs.", + "Sentence": "\n\n The information-gathering process can be a specific task of the military component, but it can also be a by-product of its normal operations, e.g., information gathered by patrols and the activities of MILOBs.", "newParagraph": "ddr component mission coordinate manage information gathering reporting task supplementary information provided joint operation centre joc joint mission analysis centre jmac military component seek information following n location sex agedisaggregated troop strength intention former combatant associated group may become part ddr process n estimate numbertype weapon ammunition expected collectedstored ddr process including held woman child accurate estimate may difficult achieve planning disarmament broader transitional wam must include flexibility n sex agedisaggregated estimate noncombatant associated armed force including woman child elderly woundeddisabled people role responsibility also identified particularly human trafficking slavery andor sexual genderbased violence suspected n information un system organization ngo woman youth group nn informationgathering process specific task military component also byproduct normal operation eg information gathered patrol activity milobs previous experience shown leader armed group often withhold distort information related ddr particularly communicating rank file military component used detect whether happening assist dealing challenge part public information sensitization campaign associated ddr see iddrs 460 public information strategic communication support ddr", "ProcessedSent": "nn informationgathering process specific task military component also byproduct normal operation eg information gathered patrol activity milobs", "SentID": 6010 }, { "ParagraphID": 1852, - "Paragraph": "The DDR component of the mission should coordinate and manage information gathering and reporting tasks, with supplementary information provided by the Joint Operations Centre (JOC) and Joint Mission Analysis Centre (JMAC). The military component can seek information on the following: \\n The locations, sex- and age-disaggregated troop strengths, and intentions of former combatants or associated groups, who may or will become part of a DDR process. \\n Estimates of the number\/type of weapons and ammunition expected to be collected\/stored during a DDR process, including those held by women and children. As accurate estimates may be difficult to achieve, planning for disarmament and broader transitional WAM must include some flexibility. \\n Sex- and age-disaggregated estimates of non-combatants associated with the armed forces, including women, children, and elderly or wounded\/disabled people. Their roles and responsibilities should also be identified, particularly if human trafficking, slavery, and\/or sexual and gender-based violence is suspected. \\n Information from UN system organizations, NGOs, and women\u2019s and youth groups. \\n\\n The information-gathering process can be a specific task of the military component, but it can also be a by-product of its normal operations, e.g., information gathered by patrols and the activities of MILOBs. Previous experience has shown that the leaders of armed groups often withhold or distort information related to DDR, particularly when communicating with the rank and file. Military components can be used to detect whether this is happening and can assist in dealing with this challenge as part of the public information and sensitization campaigns associated with DDR (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR).", + "Paragraph": "The DDR component of the mission should coordinate and manage information gathering and reporting tasks, with supplementary information provided by the Joint Operations Centre (JOC) and Joint Mission Analysis Centre (JMAC). The military component can seek information on the following: \n The locations, sex- and age-disaggregated troop strengths, and intentions of former combatants or associated groups, who may or will become part of a DDR process. \n Estimates of the number\/type of weapons and ammunition expected to be collected\/stored during a DDR process, including those held by women and children. As accurate estimates may be difficult to achieve, planning for disarmament and broader transitional WAM must include some flexibility. \n Sex- and age-disaggregated estimates of non-combatants associated with the armed forces, including women, children, and elderly or wounded\/disabled people. Their roles and responsibilities should also be identified, particularly if human trafficking, slavery, and\/or sexual and gender-based violence is suspected. \n Information from UN system organizations, NGOs, and women\u2019s and youth groups. \n\n The information-gathering process can be a specific task of the military component, but it can also be a by-product of its normal operations, e.g., information gathered by patrols and the activities of MILOBs. Previous experience has shown that the leaders of armed groups often withhold or distort information related to DDR, particularly when communicating with the rank and file. Military components can be used to detect whether this is happening and can assist in dealing with this challenge as part of the public information and sensitization campaigns associated with DDR (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -108217,7 +108217,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1852, - "Paragraph": "The DDR component of the mission should coordinate and manage information gathering and reporting tasks, with supplementary information provided by the Joint Operations Centre (JOC) and Joint Mission Analysis Centre (JMAC). The military component can seek information on the following: \\n The locations, sex- and age-disaggregated troop strengths, and intentions of former combatants or associated groups, who may or will become part of a DDR process. \\n Estimates of the number\/type of weapons and ammunition expected to be collected\/stored during a DDR process, including those held by women and children. As accurate estimates may be difficult to achieve, planning for disarmament and broader transitional WAM must include some flexibility. \\n Sex- and age-disaggregated estimates of non-combatants associated with the armed forces, including women, children, and elderly or wounded\/disabled people. Their roles and responsibilities should also be identified, particularly if human trafficking, slavery, and\/or sexual and gender-based violence is suspected. \\n Information from UN system organizations, NGOs, and women\u2019s and youth groups. \\n\\n The information-gathering process can be a specific task of the military component, but it can also be a by-product of its normal operations, e.g., information gathered by patrols and the activities of MILOBs. Previous experience has shown that the leaders of armed groups often withhold or distort information related to DDR, particularly when communicating with the rank and file. Military components can be used to detect whether this is happening and can assist in dealing with this challenge as part of the public information and sensitization campaigns associated with DDR (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR).", + "Paragraph": "The DDR component of the mission should coordinate and manage information gathering and reporting tasks, with supplementary information provided by the Joint Operations Centre (JOC) and Joint Mission Analysis Centre (JMAC). The military component can seek information on the following: \n The locations, sex- and age-disaggregated troop strengths, and intentions of former combatants or associated groups, who may or will become part of a DDR process. \n Estimates of the number\/type of weapons and ammunition expected to be collected\/stored during a DDR process, including those held by women and children. As accurate estimates may be difficult to achieve, planning for disarmament and broader transitional WAM must include some flexibility. \n Sex- and age-disaggregated estimates of non-combatants associated with the armed forces, including women, children, and elderly or wounded\/disabled people. Their roles and responsibilities should also be identified, particularly if human trafficking, slavery, and\/or sexual and gender-based violence is suspected. \n Information from UN system organizations, NGOs, and women\u2019s and youth groups. \n\n The information-gathering process can be a specific task of the military component, but it can also be a by-product of its normal operations, e.g., information gathered by patrols and the activities of MILOBs. Previous experience has shown that the leaders of armed groups often withhold or distort information related to DDR, particularly when communicating with the rank and file. Military components can be used to detect whether this is happening and can assist in dealing with this challenge as part of the public information and sensitization campaigns associated with DDR (see IDDRS 4.60 on Public Information and Strategic Communication in Support of DDR).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -108937,7 +108937,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1864, - "Paragraph": "Military capacity used in a DDR process is planned in detail and carried out by the military component of the mission within the limits of its capabilities. Military staff officers could fill posts in a DDR component as follows: \\n Mil SO1 DDR \u2013 military liaison (Lieutenant Colonel); \\n Mil SO2 DDR \u2013 military liaison (Major); \\n Mil SO2 DDR \u2013 disarmament and weapons control (Major); \\n Mil SO2 DDR \u2013 gender and protection issues (Major). \\n\\n The posts will be designed to meet the specific requirements of the mission.", + "Paragraph": "Military capacity used in a DDR process is planned in detail and carried out by the military component of the mission within the limits of its capabilities. Military staff officers could fill posts in a DDR component as follows: \n Mil SO1 DDR \u2013 military liaison (Lieutenant Colonel); \n Mil SO2 DDR \u2013 military liaison (Major); \n Mil SO2 DDR \u2013 disarmament and weapons control (Major); \n Mil SO2 DDR \u2013 gender and protection issues (Major). \n\n The posts will be designed to meet the specific requirements of the mission.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -108955,7 +108955,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1864, - "Paragraph": "Military capacity used in a DDR process is planned in detail and carried out by the military component of the mission within the limits of its capabilities. Military staff officers could fill posts in a DDR component as follows: \\n Mil SO1 DDR \u2013 military liaison (Lieutenant Colonel); \\n Mil SO2 DDR \u2013 military liaison (Major); \\n Mil SO2 DDR \u2013 disarmament and weapons control (Major); \\n Mil SO2 DDR \u2013 gender and protection issues (Major). \\n\\n The posts will be designed to meet the specific requirements of the mission.", + "Paragraph": "Military capacity used in a DDR process is planned in detail and carried out by the military component of the mission within the limits of its capabilities. Military staff officers could fill posts in a DDR component as follows: \n Mil SO1 DDR \u2013 military liaison (Lieutenant Colonel); \n Mil SO2 DDR \u2013 military liaison (Major); \n Mil SO2 DDR \u2013 disarmament and weapons control (Major); \n Mil SO2 DDR \u2013 gender and protection issues (Major). \n\n The posts will be designed to meet the specific requirements of the mission.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -108966,14 +108966,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.10 DDR component staffing", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Military staff officers could fill posts in a DDR component as follows: \\n Mil SO1 DDR \u2013 military liaison (Lieutenant Colonel); \\n Mil SO2 DDR \u2013 military liaison (Major); \\n Mil SO2 DDR \u2013 disarmament and weapons control (Major); \\n Mil SO2 DDR \u2013 gender and protection issues (Major).", + "Sentence": "Military staff officers could fill posts in a DDR component as follows: \n Mil SO1 DDR \u2013 military liaison (Lieutenant Colonel); \n Mil SO2 DDR \u2013 military liaison (Major); \n Mil SO2 DDR \u2013 disarmament and weapons control (Major); \n Mil SO2 DDR \u2013 gender and protection issues (Major).", "newParagraph": "military capacity used ddr process planned detail carried military component mission within limit capability military staff officer could fill post ddr component follows n mil so1 ddr military liaison lieutenant colonel n mil so2 ddr military liaison major n mil so2 ddr disarmament weapon control major n mil so2 ddr gender protection issue major nn post designed meet specific requirement mission", "ProcessedSent": "military staff officer could fill post ddr component follows n mil so1 ddr military liaison lieutenant colonel n mil so2 ddr military liaison major n mil so2 ddr disarmament weapon control major n mil so2 ddr gender protection issue major", "SentID": 6053 }, { "ParagraphID": 1864, - "Paragraph": "Military capacity used in a DDR process is planned in detail and carried out by the military component of the mission within the limits of its capabilities. Military staff officers could fill posts in a DDR component as follows: \\n Mil SO1 DDR \u2013 military liaison (Lieutenant Colonel); \\n Mil SO2 DDR \u2013 military liaison (Major); \\n Mil SO2 DDR \u2013 disarmament and weapons control (Major); \\n Mil SO2 DDR \u2013 gender and protection issues (Major). \\n\\n The posts will be designed to meet the specific requirements of the mission.", + "Paragraph": "Military capacity used in a DDR process is planned in detail and carried out by the military component of the mission within the limits of its capabilities. Military staff officers could fill posts in a DDR component as follows: \n Mil SO1 DDR \u2013 military liaison (Lieutenant Colonel); \n Mil SO2 DDR \u2013 military liaison (Major); \n Mil SO2 DDR \u2013 disarmament and weapons control (Major); \n Mil SO2 DDR \u2013 gender and protection issues (Major). \n\n The posts will be designed to meet the specific requirements of the mission.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -108984,7 +108984,7 @@ "Heading2": "5.10 DDR component staffing", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n The posts will be designed to meet the specific requirements of the mission.", + "Sentence": "\n\n The posts will be designed to meet the specific requirements of the mission.", "newParagraph": "military capacity used ddr process planned detail carried military component mission within limit capability military staff officer could fill post ddr component follows n mil so1 ddr military liaison lieutenant colonel n mil so2 ddr military liaison major n mil so2 ddr disarmament weapon control major n mil so2 ddr gender protection issue major nn post designed meet specific requirement mission", "ProcessedSent": "nn post designed meet specific requirement mission", "SentID": 6054 @@ -109153,7 +109153,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1868, - "Paragraph": "The modalities of integration into the security sector can be outlined in technical agreements and\/or in protocols on defence and security. National legislation regulating the security sector may also need to be adjusted through the passage of laws and decrees in line with the peace agreement. At a minimum, the institutional and legal framework for SSR shall provide: \\n An agreement on the number of former members of armed groups for integration into the security sector; \\n Clear vetting criteria, in particular a process shall be in place to ensure that individuals who have committed war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, terrorist offences or human rights violations are not eligible for integration; in addition, due diligence measures shall be taken to ensure that children are not recruited into the military; \\n A clear framework to establish a policy and ensure implementation of appropriate training on relevant legal and regulatory instruments applicable to the security sector, including a code of conduct; \\n A clear and transparent policy for rank harmonization.", + "Paragraph": "The modalities of integration into the security sector can be outlined in technical agreements and\/or in protocols on defence and security. National legislation regulating the security sector may also need to be adjusted through the passage of laws and decrees in line with the peace agreement. At a minimum, the institutional and legal framework for SSR shall provide: \n An agreement on the number of former members of armed groups for integration into the security sector; \n Clear vetting criteria, in particular a process shall be in place to ensure that individuals who have committed war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, terrorist offences or human rights violations are not eligible for integration; in addition, due diligence measures shall be taken to ensure that children are not recruited into the military; \n A clear framework to establish a policy and ensure implementation of appropriate training on relevant legal and regulatory instruments applicable to the security sector, including a code of conduct; \n A clear and transparent policy for rank harmonization.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -109171,7 +109171,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1868, - "Paragraph": "The modalities of integration into the security sector can be outlined in technical agreements and\/or in protocols on defence and security. National legislation regulating the security sector may also need to be adjusted through the passage of laws and decrees in line with the peace agreement. At a minimum, the institutional and legal framework for SSR shall provide: \\n An agreement on the number of former members of armed groups for integration into the security sector; \\n Clear vetting criteria, in particular a process shall be in place to ensure that individuals who have committed war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, terrorist offences or human rights violations are not eligible for integration; in addition, due diligence measures shall be taken to ensure that children are not recruited into the military; \\n A clear framework to establish a policy and ensure implementation of appropriate training on relevant legal and regulatory instruments applicable to the security sector, including a code of conduct; \\n A clear and transparent policy for rank harmonization.", + "Paragraph": "The modalities of integration into the security sector can be outlined in technical agreements and\/or in protocols on defence and security. National legislation regulating the security sector may also need to be adjusted through the passage of laws and decrees in line with the peace agreement. At a minimum, the institutional and legal framework for SSR shall provide: \n An agreement on the number of former members of armed groups for integration into the security sector; \n Clear vetting criteria, in particular a process shall be in place to ensure that individuals who have committed war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, terrorist offences or human rights violations are not eligible for integration; in addition, due diligence measures shall be taken to ensure that children are not recruited into the military; \n A clear framework to establish a policy and ensure implementation of appropriate training on relevant legal and regulatory instruments applicable to the security sector, including a code of conduct; \n A clear and transparent policy for rank harmonization.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -109189,7 +109189,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1868, - "Paragraph": "The modalities of integration into the security sector can be outlined in technical agreements and\/or in protocols on defence and security. National legislation regulating the security sector may also need to be adjusted through the passage of laws and decrees in line with the peace agreement. At a minimum, the institutional and legal framework for SSR shall provide: \\n An agreement on the number of former members of armed groups for integration into the security sector; \\n Clear vetting criteria, in particular a process shall be in place to ensure that individuals who have committed war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, terrorist offences or human rights violations are not eligible for integration; in addition, due diligence measures shall be taken to ensure that children are not recruited into the military; \\n A clear framework to establish a policy and ensure implementation of appropriate training on relevant legal and regulatory instruments applicable to the security sector, including a code of conduct; \\n A clear and transparent policy for rank harmonization.", + "Paragraph": "The modalities of integration into the security sector can be outlined in technical agreements and\/or in protocols on defence and security. National legislation regulating the security sector may also need to be adjusted through the passage of laws and decrees in line with the peace agreement. At a minimum, the institutional and legal framework for SSR shall provide: \n An agreement on the number of former members of armed groups for integration into the security sector; \n Clear vetting criteria, in particular a process shall be in place to ensure that individuals who have committed war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, terrorist offences or human rights violations are not eligible for integration; in addition, due diligence measures shall be taken to ensure that children are not recruited into the military; \n A clear framework to establish a policy and ensure implementation of appropriate training on relevant legal and regulatory instruments applicable to the security sector, including a code of conduct; \n A clear and transparent policy for rank harmonization.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -109200,7 +109200,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "At a minimum, the institutional and legal framework for SSR shall provide: \\n An agreement on the number of former members of armed groups for integration into the security sector; \\n Clear vetting criteria, in particular a process shall be in place to ensure that individuals who have committed war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, terrorist offences or human rights violations are not eligible for integration; in addition, due diligence measures shall be taken to ensure that children are not recruited into the military; \\n A clear framework to establish a policy and ensure implementation of appropriate training on relevant legal and regulatory instruments applicable to the security sector, including a code of conduct; \\n A clear and transparent policy for rank harmonization.", + "Sentence": "At a minimum, the institutional and legal framework for SSR shall provide: \n An agreement on the number of former members of armed groups for integration into the security sector; \n Clear vetting criteria, in particular a process shall be in place to ensure that individuals who have committed war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, terrorist offences or human rights violations are not eligible for integration; in addition, due diligence measures shall be taken to ensure that children are not recruited into the military; \n A clear framework to establish a policy and ensure implementation of appropriate training on relevant legal and regulatory instruments applicable to the security sector, including a code of conduct; \n A clear and transparent policy for rank harmonization.", "newParagraph": "modality integration security sector outlined technical agreement andor protocol defence security national legislation regulating security sector may also need adjusted passage law decree line peace agreement minimum institutional legal framework ssr shall provide n agreement number former member armed group integration security sector n clear vetting criterion particular process shall place ensure individual committed war crime crime humanity genocide terrorist offence human right violation eligible integration addition due diligence measure shall taken ensure child recruited military n clear framework establish policy ensure implementation appropriate training relevant legal regulatory instrument applicable security sector including code conduct n clear transparent policy rank harmonization", "ProcessedSent": "minimum institutional legal framework ssr shall provide n agreement number former member armed group integration security sector n clear vetting criterion particular process shall place ensure individual committed war crime crime humanity genocide terrorist offence human right violation eligible integration addition due diligence measure shall taken ensure child recruited military n clear framework establish policy ensure implementation appropriate training relevant legal regulatory instrument applicable security sector including code conduct n clear transparent policy rank harmonization", "SentID": 6066 @@ -109387,7 +109387,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1872, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Good offices engagements may vary and will not necessarily include MILOBS or military advisers. \\n 2 See http:\/\/dag.un.org\/handle\/11176\/400883 \\n 3 See https:\/\/elearning.un.org\/CONT\/GEN\/CS\/UNHR_V3\/Module_01\/story_content\/external_files\/4.11_HRDDP%20Guidance%20Note% 202015.pdf", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Good offices engagements may vary and will not necessarily include MILOBS or military advisers. \n 2 See http:\/\/dag.un.org\/handle\/11176\/400883 \n 3 See https:\/\/elearning.un.org\/CONT\/GEN\/CS\/UNHR_V3\/Module_01\/story_content\/external_files\/4.11_HRDDP%20Guidance%20Note% 202015.pdf", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -109398,14 +109398,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 1 Good offices engagements may vary and will not necessarily include MILOBS or military advisers.", + "Sentence": "\n 1 Good offices engagements may vary and will not necessarily include MILOBS or military advisers.", "newParagraph": "n 1 good office engagement may vary necessarily include milobs military adviser n 2 see httpdagunorghandle11176400883 n 3 see httpselearningunorgcontgencsunhrv3module01storycontentexternalfiles411hrddp20guidance20note 202015pdf", "ProcessedSent": "n 1 good office engagement may vary necessarily include milobs military adviser", "SentID": 6077 }, { "ParagraphID": 1872, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Good offices engagements may vary and will not necessarily include MILOBS or military advisers. \\n 2 See http:\/\/dag.un.org\/handle\/11176\/400883 \\n 3 See https:\/\/elearning.un.org\/CONT\/GEN\/CS\/UNHR_V3\/Module_01\/story_content\/external_files\/4.11_HRDDP%20Guidance%20Note% 202015.pdf", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Good offices engagements may vary and will not necessarily include MILOBS or military advisers. \n 2 See http:\/\/dag.un.org\/handle\/11176\/400883 \n 3 See https:\/\/elearning.un.org\/CONT\/GEN\/CS\/UNHR_V3\/Module_01\/story_content\/external_files\/4.11_HRDDP%20Guidance%20Note% 202015.pdf", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -109416,7 +109416,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 2 See http:\/\/dag.un.org\/handle\/11176\/400883 \\n 3 See https:\/\/elearning.un.org\/CONT\/GEN\/CS\/UNHR_V3\/Module_01\/story_content\/external_files\/4.11_HRDDP%20Guidance%20Note% 202015.pdf", + "Sentence": "\n 2 See http:\/\/dag.un.org\/handle\/11176\/400883 \n 3 See https:\/\/elearning.un.org\/CONT\/GEN\/CS\/UNHR_V3\/Module_01\/story_content\/external_files\/4.11_HRDDP%20Guidance%20Note% 202015.pdf", "newParagraph": "n 1 good office engagement may vary necessarily include milobs military adviser n 2 see httpdagunorghandle11176400883 n 3 see httpselearningunorgcontgencsunhrv3module01storycontentexternalfiles411hrddp20guidance20note 202015pdf", "ProcessedSent": "n 2 see httpdagunorghandle11176400883 n 3 see httpselearningunorgcontgencsunhrv3module01storycontentexternalfiles411hrddp20guidance20note 202015pdf", "SentID": 6078 @@ -109819,7 +109819,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1880, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -109837,7 +109837,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1880, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -109848,7 +109848,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may must used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "ProcessedSent": "use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "SentID": 6102 @@ -111943,7 +111943,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1917, - "Paragraph": "Strategic: This is the level where specific policy issues are conceptualized and formulated, usually with the ministry of interior or equivalent. UN police personnel can provide assistance in adopting policing policies, drafting police reform decrees, and reiterating that professional, effective, accountable, accessible and gender-responsive law enforcement, corrections, and judicial institutions are necessary to lay the foundations for sustaining peace and peacebuilding. They can also provide advice to police executive boards and senior police leadership on the establishment of institutional development plans, the enhancement of internal and effective oversight structures, the creation of training programmes and the promotion of gender equality within the police service. Operational or middle management: At this level, UN police personnel can work with operational commanders and mid-level managers, advising them on how to implement concepts and policies on the ground. UN police personnel should also take note of any specific equipment, infrastructure and training requirements and take action to address these needs. \\n Service delivery: At this level, UN police personnel can monitor, mentor and advise local police officers working at the community-level, both through working side by side and by conducting joint activities. This work is done in order to ensure that the delivery of the State police service is appropriate and complies with professional standards and codes of conduct of policing as well as with the UN HRDDP. This work is also built on the recognition that State police services are often the primary link between the Government and communities on security issues.", + "Paragraph": "Strategic: This is the level where specific policy issues are conceptualized and formulated, usually with the ministry of interior or equivalent. UN police personnel can provide assistance in adopting policing policies, drafting police reform decrees, and reiterating that professional, effective, accountable, accessible and gender-responsive law enforcement, corrections, and judicial institutions are necessary to lay the foundations for sustaining peace and peacebuilding. They can also provide advice to police executive boards and senior police leadership on the establishment of institutional development plans, the enhancement of internal and effective oversight structures, the creation of training programmes and the promotion of gender equality within the police service. Operational or middle management: At this level, UN police personnel can work with operational commanders and mid-level managers, advising them on how to implement concepts and policies on the ground. UN police personnel should also take note of any specific equipment, infrastructure and training requirements and take action to address these needs. \n Service delivery: At this level, UN police personnel can monitor, mentor and advise local police officers working at the community-level, both through working side by side and by conducting joint activities. This work is done in order to ensure that the delivery of the State police service is appropriate and complies with professional standards and codes of conduct of policing as well as with the UN HRDDP. This work is also built on the recognition that State police services are often the primary link between the Government and communities on security issues.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -111961,7 +111961,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1917, - "Paragraph": "Strategic: This is the level where specific policy issues are conceptualized and formulated, usually with the ministry of interior or equivalent. UN police personnel can provide assistance in adopting policing policies, drafting police reform decrees, and reiterating that professional, effective, accountable, accessible and gender-responsive law enforcement, corrections, and judicial institutions are necessary to lay the foundations for sustaining peace and peacebuilding. They can also provide advice to police executive boards and senior police leadership on the establishment of institutional development plans, the enhancement of internal and effective oversight structures, the creation of training programmes and the promotion of gender equality within the police service. Operational or middle management: At this level, UN police personnel can work with operational commanders and mid-level managers, advising them on how to implement concepts and policies on the ground. UN police personnel should also take note of any specific equipment, infrastructure and training requirements and take action to address these needs. \\n Service delivery: At this level, UN police personnel can monitor, mentor and advise local police officers working at the community-level, both through working side by side and by conducting joint activities. This work is done in order to ensure that the delivery of the State police service is appropriate and complies with professional standards and codes of conduct of policing as well as with the UN HRDDP. This work is also built on the recognition that State police services are often the primary link between the Government and communities on security issues.", + "Paragraph": "Strategic: This is the level where specific policy issues are conceptualized and formulated, usually with the ministry of interior or equivalent. UN police personnel can provide assistance in adopting policing policies, drafting police reform decrees, and reiterating that professional, effective, accountable, accessible and gender-responsive law enforcement, corrections, and judicial institutions are necessary to lay the foundations for sustaining peace and peacebuilding. They can also provide advice to police executive boards and senior police leadership on the establishment of institutional development plans, the enhancement of internal and effective oversight structures, the creation of training programmes and the promotion of gender equality within the police service. Operational or middle management: At this level, UN police personnel can work with operational commanders and mid-level managers, advising them on how to implement concepts and policies on the ground. UN police personnel should also take note of any specific equipment, infrastructure and training requirements and take action to address these needs. \n Service delivery: At this level, UN police personnel can monitor, mentor and advise local police officers working at the community-level, both through working side by side and by conducting joint activities. This work is done in order to ensure that the delivery of the State police service is appropriate and complies with professional standards and codes of conduct of policing as well as with the UN HRDDP. This work is also built on the recognition that State police services are often the primary link between the Government and communities on security issues.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -111979,7 +111979,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1917, - "Paragraph": "Strategic: This is the level where specific policy issues are conceptualized and formulated, usually with the ministry of interior or equivalent. UN police personnel can provide assistance in adopting policing policies, drafting police reform decrees, and reiterating that professional, effective, accountable, accessible and gender-responsive law enforcement, corrections, and judicial institutions are necessary to lay the foundations for sustaining peace and peacebuilding. They can also provide advice to police executive boards and senior police leadership on the establishment of institutional development plans, the enhancement of internal and effective oversight structures, the creation of training programmes and the promotion of gender equality within the police service. Operational or middle management: At this level, UN police personnel can work with operational commanders and mid-level managers, advising them on how to implement concepts and policies on the ground. UN police personnel should also take note of any specific equipment, infrastructure and training requirements and take action to address these needs. \\n Service delivery: At this level, UN police personnel can monitor, mentor and advise local police officers working at the community-level, both through working side by side and by conducting joint activities. This work is done in order to ensure that the delivery of the State police service is appropriate and complies with professional standards and codes of conduct of policing as well as with the UN HRDDP. This work is also built on the recognition that State police services are often the primary link between the Government and communities on security issues.", + "Paragraph": "Strategic: This is the level where specific policy issues are conceptualized and formulated, usually with the ministry of interior or equivalent. UN police personnel can provide assistance in adopting policing policies, drafting police reform decrees, and reiterating that professional, effective, accountable, accessible and gender-responsive law enforcement, corrections, and judicial institutions are necessary to lay the foundations for sustaining peace and peacebuilding. They can also provide advice to police executive boards and senior police leadership on the establishment of institutional development plans, the enhancement of internal and effective oversight structures, the creation of training programmes and the promotion of gender equality within the police service. Operational or middle management: At this level, UN police personnel can work with operational commanders and mid-level managers, advising them on how to implement concepts and policies on the ground. UN police personnel should also take note of any specific equipment, infrastructure and training requirements and take action to address these needs. \n Service delivery: At this level, UN police personnel can monitor, mentor and advise local police officers working at the community-level, both through working side by side and by conducting joint activities. This work is done in order to ensure that the delivery of the State police service is appropriate and complies with professional standards and codes of conduct of policing as well as with the UN HRDDP. This work is also built on the recognition that State police services are often the primary link between the Government and communities on security issues.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -111997,7 +111997,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1917, - "Paragraph": "Strategic: This is the level where specific policy issues are conceptualized and formulated, usually with the ministry of interior or equivalent. UN police personnel can provide assistance in adopting policing policies, drafting police reform decrees, and reiterating that professional, effective, accountable, accessible and gender-responsive law enforcement, corrections, and judicial institutions are necessary to lay the foundations for sustaining peace and peacebuilding. They can also provide advice to police executive boards and senior police leadership on the establishment of institutional development plans, the enhancement of internal and effective oversight structures, the creation of training programmes and the promotion of gender equality within the police service. Operational or middle management: At this level, UN police personnel can work with operational commanders and mid-level managers, advising them on how to implement concepts and policies on the ground. UN police personnel should also take note of any specific equipment, infrastructure and training requirements and take action to address these needs. \\n Service delivery: At this level, UN police personnel can monitor, mentor and advise local police officers working at the community-level, both through working side by side and by conducting joint activities. This work is done in order to ensure that the delivery of the State police service is appropriate and complies with professional standards and codes of conduct of policing as well as with the UN HRDDP. This work is also built on the recognition that State police services are often the primary link between the Government and communities on security issues.", + "Paragraph": "Strategic: This is the level where specific policy issues are conceptualized and formulated, usually with the ministry of interior or equivalent. UN police personnel can provide assistance in adopting policing policies, drafting police reform decrees, and reiterating that professional, effective, accountable, accessible and gender-responsive law enforcement, corrections, and judicial institutions are necessary to lay the foundations for sustaining peace and peacebuilding. They can also provide advice to police executive boards and senior police leadership on the establishment of institutional development plans, the enhancement of internal and effective oversight structures, the creation of training programmes and the promotion of gender equality within the police service. Operational or middle management: At this level, UN police personnel can work with operational commanders and mid-level managers, advising them on how to implement concepts and policies on the ground. UN police personnel should also take note of any specific equipment, infrastructure and training requirements and take action to address these needs. \n Service delivery: At this level, UN police personnel can monitor, mentor and advise local police officers working at the community-level, both through working side by side and by conducting joint activities. This work is done in order to ensure that the delivery of the State police service is appropriate and complies with professional standards and codes of conduct of policing as well as with the UN HRDDP. This work is also built on the recognition that State police services are often the primary link between the Government and communities on security issues.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -112015,7 +112015,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1917, - "Paragraph": "Strategic: This is the level where specific policy issues are conceptualized and formulated, usually with the ministry of interior or equivalent. UN police personnel can provide assistance in adopting policing policies, drafting police reform decrees, and reiterating that professional, effective, accountable, accessible and gender-responsive law enforcement, corrections, and judicial institutions are necessary to lay the foundations for sustaining peace and peacebuilding. They can also provide advice to police executive boards and senior police leadership on the establishment of institutional development plans, the enhancement of internal and effective oversight structures, the creation of training programmes and the promotion of gender equality within the police service. Operational or middle management: At this level, UN police personnel can work with operational commanders and mid-level managers, advising them on how to implement concepts and policies on the ground. UN police personnel should also take note of any specific equipment, infrastructure and training requirements and take action to address these needs. \\n Service delivery: At this level, UN police personnel can monitor, mentor and advise local police officers working at the community-level, both through working side by side and by conducting joint activities. This work is done in order to ensure that the delivery of the State police service is appropriate and complies with professional standards and codes of conduct of policing as well as with the UN HRDDP. This work is also built on the recognition that State police services are often the primary link between the Government and communities on security issues.", + "Paragraph": "Strategic: This is the level where specific policy issues are conceptualized and formulated, usually with the ministry of interior or equivalent. UN police personnel can provide assistance in adopting policing policies, drafting police reform decrees, and reiterating that professional, effective, accountable, accessible and gender-responsive law enforcement, corrections, and judicial institutions are necessary to lay the foundations for sustaining peace and peacebuilding. They can also provide advice to police executive boards and senior police leadership on the establishment of institutional development plans, the enhancement of internal and effective oversight structures, the creation of training programmes and the promotion of gender equality within the police service. Operational or middle management: At this level, UN police personnel can work with operational commanders and mid-level managers, advising them on how to implement concepts and policies on the ground. UN police personnel should also take note of any specific equipment, infrastructure and training requirements and take action to address these needs. \n Service delivery: At this level, UN police personnel can monitor, mentor and advise local police officers working at the community-level, both through working side by side and by conducting joint activities. This work is done in order to ensure that the delivery of the State police service is appropriate and complies with professional standards and codes of conduct of policing as well as with the UN HRDDP. This work is also built on the recognition that State police services are often the primary link between the Government and communities on security issues.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -112033,7 +112033,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1917, - "Paragraph": "Strategic: This is the level where specific policy issues are conceptualized and formulated, usually with the ministry of interior or equivalent. UN police personnel can provide assistance in adopting policing policies, drafting police reform decrees, and reiterating that professional, effective, accountable, accessible and gender-responsive law enforcement, corrections, and judicial institutions are necessary to lay the foundations for sustaining peace and peacebuilding. They can also provide advice to police executive boards and senior police leadership on the establishment of institutional development plans, the enhancement of internal and effective oversight structures, the creation of training programmes and the promotion of gender equality within the police service. Operational or middle management: At this level, UN police personnel can work with operational commanders and mid-level managers, advising them on how to implement concepts and policies on the ground. UN police personnel should also take note of any specific equipment, infrastructure and training requirements and take action to address these needs. \\n Service delivery: At this level, UN police personnel can monitor, mentor and advise local police officers working at the community-level, both through working side by side and by conducting joint activities. This work is done in order to ensure that the delivery of the State police service is appropriate and complies with professional standards and codes of conduct of policing as well as with the UN HRDDP. This work is also built on the recognition that State police services are often the primary link between the Government and communities on security issues.", + "Paragraph": "Strategic: This is the level where specific policy issues are conceptualized and formulated, usually with the ministry of interior or equivalent. UN police personnel can provide assistance in adopting policing policies, drafting police reform decrees, and reiterating that professional, effective, accountable, accessible and gender-responsive law enforcement, corrections, and judicial institutions are necessary to lay the foundations for sustaining peace and peacebuilding. They can also provide advice to police executive boards and senior police leadership on the establishment of institutional development plans, the enhancement of internal and effective oversight structures, the creation of training programmes and the promotion of gender equality within the police service. Operational or middle management: At this level, UN police personnel can work with operational commanders and mid-level managers, advising them on how to implement concepts and policies on the ground. UN police personnel should also take note of any specific equipment, infrastructure and training requirements and take action to address these needs. \n Service delivery: At this level, UN police personnel can monitor, mentor and advise local police officers working at the community-level, both through working side by side and by conducting joint activities. This work is done in order to ensure that the delivery of the State police service is appropriate and complies with professional standards and codes of conduct of policing as well as with the UN HRDDP. This work is also built on the recognition that State police services are often the primary link between the Government and communities on security issues.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -112044,14 +112044,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Advice", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Service delivery: At this level, UN police personnel can monitor, mentor and advise local police officers working at the community-level, both through working side by side and by conducting joint activities.", + "Sentence": "\n Service delivery: At this level, UN police personnel can monitor, mentor and advise local police officers working at the community-level, both through working side by side and by conducting joint activities.", "newParagraph": "strategic level specific policy issue conceptualized formulated usually ministry interior equivalent un police personnel provide assistance adopting policing policy drafting police reform decree reiterating professional effective accountable accessible genderresponsive law enforcement correction judicial institution necessary lay foundation sustaining peace peacebuilding also provide advice police executive board senior police leadership establishment institutional development plan enhancement internal effective oversight structure creation training programme promotion gender equality within police service operational middle management level un police personnel work operational commander midlevel manager advising implement concept policy ground un police personnel also take note specific equipment infrastructure training requirement take action address need n service delivery level un police personnel monitor mentor advise local police officer working communitylevel working side side conducting joint activity work done order ensure delivery state police service appropriate complies professional standard code conduct policing well un hrddp work also built recognition state police service often primary link government community security issue", "ProcessedSent": "n service delivery level un police personnel monitor mentor advise local police officer working communitylevel working side side conducting joint activity", "SentID": 6224 }, { "ParagraphID": 1917, - "Paragraph": "Strategic: This is the level where specific policy issues are conceptualized and formulated, usually with the ministry of interior or equivalent. UN police personnel can provide assistance in adopting policing policies, drafting police reform decrees, and reiterating that professional, effective, accountable, accessible and gender-responsive law enforcement, corrections, and judicial institutions are necessary to lay the foundations for sustaining peace and peacebuilding. They can also provide advice to police executive boards and senior police leadership on the establishment of institutional development plans, the enhancement of internal and effective oversight structures, the creation of training programmes and the promotion of gender equality within the police service. Operational or middle management: At this level, UN police personnel can work with operational commanders and mid-level managers, advising them on how to implement concepts and policies on the ground. UN police personnel should also take note of any specific equipment, infrastructure and training requirements and take action to address these needs. \\n Service delivery: At this level, UN police personnel can monitor, mentor and advise local police officers working at the community-level, both through working side by side and by conducting joint activities. This work is done in order to ensure that the delivery of the State police service is appropriate and complies with professional standards and codes of conduct of policing as well as with the UN HRDDP. This work is also built on the recognition that State police services are often the primary link between the Government and communities on security issues.", + "Paragraph": "Strategic: This is the level where specific policy issues are conceptualized and formulated, usually with the ministry of interior or equivalent. UN police personnel can provide assistance in adopting policing policies, drafting police reform decrees, and reiterating that professional, effective, accountable, accessible and gender-responsive law enforcement, corrections, and judicial institutions are necessary to lay the foundations for sustaining peace and peacebuilding. They can also provide advice to police executive boards and senior police leadership on the establishment of institutional development plans, the enhancement of internal and effective oversight structures, the creation of training programmes and the promotion of gender equality within the police service. Operational or middle management: At this level, UN police personnel can work with operational commanders and mid-level managers, advising them on how to implement concepts and policies on the ground. UN police personnel should also take note of any specific equipment, infrastructure and training requirements and take action to address these needs. \n Service delivery: At this level, UN police personnel can monitor, mentor and advise local police officers working at the community-level, both through working side by side and by conducting joint activities. This work is done in order to ensure that the delivery of the State police service is appropriate and complies with professional standards and codes of conduct of policing as well as with the UN HRDDP. This work is also built on the recognition that State police services are often the primary link between the Government and communities on security issues.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -112069,7 +112069,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1917, - "Paragraph": "Strategic: This is the level where specific policy issues are conceptualized and formulated, usually with the ministry of interior or equivalent. UN police personnel can provide assistance in adopting policing policies, drafting police reform decrees, and reiterating that professional, effective, accountable, accessible and gender-responsive law enforcement, corrections, and judicial institutions are necessary to lay the foundations for sustaining peace and peacebuilding. They can also provide advice to police executive boards and senior police leadership on the establishment of institutional development plans, the enhancement of internal and effective oversight structures, the creation of training programmes and the promotion of gender equality within the police service. Operational or middle management: At this level, UN police personnel can work with operational commanders and mid-level managers, advising them on how to implement concepts and policies on the ground. UN police personnel should also take note of any specific equipment, infrastructure and training requirements and take action to address these needs. \\n Service delivery: At this level, UN police personnel can monitor, mentor and advise local police officers working at the community-level, both through working side by side and by conducting joint activities. This work is done in order to ensure that the delivery of the State police service is appropriate and complies with professional standards and codes of conduct of policing as well as with the UN HRDDP. This work is also built on the recognition that State police services are often the primary link between the Government and communities on security issues.", + "Paragraph": "Strategic: This is the level where specific policy issues are conceptualized and formulated, usually with the ministry of interior or equivalent. UN police personnel can provide assistance in adopting policing policies, drafting police reform decrees, and reiterating that professional, effective, accountable, accessible and gender-responsive law enforcement, corrections, and judicial institutions are necessary to lay the foundations for sustaining peace and peacebuilding. They can also provide advice to police executive boards and senior police leadership on the establishment of institutional development plans, the enhancement of internal and effective oversight structures, the creation of training programmes and the promotion of gender equality within the police service. Operational or middle management: At this level, UN police personnel can work with operational commanders and mid-level managers, advising them on how to implement concepts and policies on the ground. UN police personnel should also take note of any specific equipment, infrastructure and training requirements and take action to address these needs. \n Service delivery: At this level, UN police personnel can monitor, mentor and advise local police officers working at the community-level, both through working side by side and by conducting joint activities. This work is done in order to ensure that the delivery of the State police service is appropriate and complies with professional standards and codes of conduct of policing as well as with the UN HRDDP. This work is also built on the recognition that State police services are often the primary link between the Government and communities on security issues.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -112951,7 +112951,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1928, - "Paragraph": "The sensitization of communities on how to take preventative action and avoid interpersonal violence increases public confidence in the police and enables them to more effectively address the needs of the most vulnerable. The following steps can be taken to strengthen public confidence in the police: \\n Open access to all police services; \\n The availability of police services 24 hours a day, 7 days a week; \\n A highly visible police presence; \\n Extensive public information campaigns; \\n The representation of minority groups and balanced ethnic composition in the police service; \\n The promotion of gender balance in the police service and gender mainstreaming in all police work; \\n The establishment of police stations or temporary advances in localities where security services are not installed. \\n Raising awareness among the police on human rights and rule of law compliant policing in practice.", + "Paragraph": "The sensitization of communities on how to take preventative action and avoid interpersonal violence increases public confidence in the police and enables them to more effectively address the needs of the most vulnerable. The following steps can be taken to strengthen public confidence in the police: \n Open access to all police services; \n The availability of police services 24 hours a day, 7 days a week; \n A highly visible police presence; \n Extensive public information campaigns; \n The representation of minority groups and balanced ethnic composition in the police service; \n The promotion of gender balance in the police service and gender mainstreaming in all police work; \n The establishment of police stations or temporary advances in localities where security services are not installed. \n Raising awareness among the police on human rights and rule of law compliant policing in practice.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -112969,7 +112969,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1928, - "Paragraph": "The sensitization of communities on how to take preventative action and avoid interpersonal violence increases public confidence in the police and enables them to more effectively address the needs of the most vulnerable. The following steps can be taken to strengthen public confidence in the police: \\n Open access to all police services; \\n The availability of police services 24 hours a day, 7 days a week; \\n A highly visible police presence; \\n Extensive public information campaigns; \\n The representation of minority groups and balanced ethnic composition in the police service; \\n The promotion of gender balance in the police service and gender mainstreaming in all police work; \\n The establishment of police stations or temporary advances in localities where security services are not installed. \\n Raising awareness among the police on human rights and rule of law compliant policing in practice.", + "Paragraph": "The sensitization of communities on how to take preventative action and avoid interpersonal violence increases public confidence in the police and enables them to more effectively address the needs of the most vulnerable. The following steps can be taken to strengthen public confidence in the police: \n Open access to all police services; \n The availability of police services 24 hours a day, 7 days a week; \n A highly visible police presence; \n Extensive public information campaigns; \n The representation of minority groups and balanced ethnic composition in the police service; \n The promotion of gender balance in the police service and gender mainstreaming in all police work; \n The establishment of police stations or temporary advances in localities where security services are not installed. \n Raising awareness among the police on human rights and rule of law compliant policing in practice.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -112980,14 +112980,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.4 Building public confidence", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The following steps can be taken to strengthen public confidence in the police: \\n Open access to all police services; \\n The availability of police services 24 hours a day, 7 days a week; \\n A highly visible police presence; \\n Extensive public information campaigns; \\n The representation of minority groups and balanced ethnic composition in the police service; \\n The promotion of gender balance in the police service and gender mainstreaming in all police work; \\n The establishment of police stations or temporary advances in localities where security services are not installed.", + "Sentence": "The following steps can be taken to strengthen public confidence in the police: \n Open access to all police services; \n The availability of police services 24 hours a day, 7 days a week; \n A highly visible police presence; \n Extensive public information campaigns; \n The representation of minority groups and balanced ethnic composition in the police service; \n The promotion of gender balance in the police service and gender mainstreaming in all police work; \n The establishment of police stations or temporary advances in localities where security services are not installed.", "newParagraph": "sensitization community take preventative action avoid interpersonal violence increase public confidence police enables effectively address need vulnerable following step taken strengthen public confidence police n open access police service n availability police service 24 hour day 7 day week n highly visible police presence n extensive public information campaign n representation minority group balanced ethnic composition police service n promotion gender balance police service gender mainstreaming police work n establishment police station temporary advance locality security service installed n raising awareness among police human right rule law compliant policing practice", "ProcessedSent": "following step taken strengthen public confidence police n open access police service n availability police service 24 hour day 7 day week n highly visible police presence n extensive public information campaign n representation minority group balanced ethnic composition police service n promotion gender balance police service gender mainstreaming police work n establishment police station temporary advance locality security service installed", "SentID": 6276 }, { "ParagraphID": 1928, - "Paragraph": "The sensitization of communities on how to take preventative action and avoid interpersonal violence increases public confidence in the police and enables them to more effectively address the needs of the most vulnerable. The following steps can be taken to strengthen public confidence in the police: \\n Open access to all police services; \\n The availability of police services 24 hours a day, 7 days a week; \\n A highly visible police presence; \\n Extensive public information campaigns; \\n The representation of minority groups and balanced ethnic composition in the police service; \\n The promotion of gender balance in the police service and gender mainstreaming in all police work; \\n The establishment of police stations or temporary advances in localities where security services are not installed. \\n Raising awareness among the police on human rights and rule of law compliant policing in practice.", + "Paragraph": "The sensitization of communities on how to take preventative action and avoid interpersonal violence increases public confidence in the police and enables them to more effectively address the needs of the most vulnerable. The following steps can be taken to strengthen public confidence in the police: \n Open access to all police services; \n The availability of police services 24 hours a day, 7 days a week; \n A highly visible police presence; \n Extensive public information campaigns; \n The representation of minority groups and balanced ethnic composition in the police service; \n The promotion of gender balance in the police service and gender mainstreaming in all police work; \n The establishment of police stations or temporary advances in localities where security services are not installed. \n Raising awareness among the police on human rights and rule of law compliant policing in practice.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -112998,7 +112998,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.4 Building public confidence", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Raising awareness among the police on human rights and rule of law compliant policing in practice.", + "Sentence": "\n Raising awareness among the police on human rights and rule of law compliant policing in practice.", "newParagraph": "sensitization community take preventative action avoid interpersonal violence increase public confidence police enables effectively address need vulnerable following step taken strengthen public confidence police n open access police service n availability police service 24 hour day 7 day week n highly visible police presence n extensive public information campaign n representation minority group balanced ethnic composition police service n promotion gender balance police service gender mainstreaming police work n establishment police station temporary advance locality security service installed n raising awareness among police human right rule law compliant policing practice", "ProcessedSent": "n raising awareness among police human right rule law compliant policing practice", "SentID": 6277 @@ -113563,7 +113563,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1936, - "Paragraph": "The role of CVR programmes within DDR processes is explained in IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction. CVR programmes can contribute to the ability of UN and State police personnel to improve local security conditions, especially outside capital cities, by exploring synergies between CVR and community-oriented policing. These possible synergies include: \\n The involvement of UN and\/or local State police representatives in the project advisory\/review committee or local selection committees. In particular, UN police personnel may be able to provide advice on sources of community violence that need to be addressed. \\n The development of CVR projects that reinforce State policing capacities. \\n Quick Impact Projects (QIPs) implemented by UN police personnel, such as the rehabilitation of local police infrastructure or the training of female police personnel, could also, where appropriate, become part of a CVR programme. \\n If the eligibility criteria for a CVR programme require the handover of weapons and\/or ammunition, UN police personnel can provide support in a variety of ways including the preliminary assessment of weapons collected, the choice of temporary storage facilities for weapons and ammunition, the registration of weapons and ammunition, and the collection of photographic records. \\n UN police personnel can also provide support to CVR programmes by diffusing key messages related to the programme. When relevant to the project at hand, UN police personnel can also provide lectures on civic education, multicultural tolerance, gender equality and respect for the rule of law.", + "Paragraph": "The role of CVR programmes within DDR processes is explained in IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction. CVR programmes can contribute to the ability of UN and State police personnel to improve local security conditions, especially outside capital cities, by exploring synergies between CVR and community-oriented policing. These possible synergies include: \n The involvement of UN and\/or local State police representatives in the project advisory\/review committee or local selection committees. In particular, UN police personnel may be able to provide advice on sources of community violence that need to be addressed. \n The development of CVR projects that reinforce State policing capacities. \n Quick Impact Projects (QIPs) implemented by UN police personnel, such as the rehabilitation of local police infrastructure or the training of female police personnel, could also, where appropriate, become part of a CVR programme. \n If the eligibility criteria for a CVR programme require the handover of weapons and\/or ammunition, UN police personnel can provide support in a variety of ways including the preliminary assessment of weapons collected, the choice of temporary storage facilities for weapons and ammunition, the registration of weapons and ammunition, and the collection of photographic records. \n UN police personnel can also provide support to CVR programmes by diffusing key messages related to the programme. When relevant to the project at hand, UN police personnel can also provide lectures on civic education, multicultural tolerance, gender equality and respect for the rule of law.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -113581,7 +113581,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1936, - "Paragraph": "The role of CVR programmes within DDR processes is explained in IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction. CVR programmes can contribute to the ability of UN and State police personnel to improve local security conditions, especially outside capital cities, by exploring synergies between CVR and community-oriented policing. These possible synergies include: \\n The involvement of UN and\/or local State police representatives in the project advisory\/review committee or local selection committees. In particular, UN police personnel may be able to provide advice on sources of community violence that need to be addressed. \\n The development of CVR projects that reinforce State policing capacities. \\n Quick Impact Projects (QIPs) implemented by UN police personnel, such as the rehabilitation of local police infrastructure or the training of female police personnel, could also, where appropriate, become part of a CVR programme. \\n If the eligibility criteria for a CVR programme require the handover of weapons and\/or ammunition, UN police personnel can provide support in a variety of ways including the preliminary assessment of weapons collected, the choice of temporary storage facilities for weapons and ammunition, the registration of weapons and ammunition, and the collection of photographic records. \\n UN police personnel can also provide support to CVR programmes by diffusing key messages related to the programme. When relevant to the project at hand, UN police personnel can also provide lectures on civic education, multicultural tolerance, gender equality and respect for the rule of law.", + "Paragraph": "The role of CVR programmes within DDR processes is explained in IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction. CVR programmes can contribute to the ability of UN and State police personnel to improve local security conditions, especially outside capital cities, by exploring synergies between CVR and community-oriented policing. These possible synergies include: \n The involvement of UN and\/or local State police representatives in the project advisory\/review committee or local selection committees. In particular, UN police personnel may be able to provide advice on sources of community violence that need to be addressed. \n The development of CVR projects that reinforce State policing capacities. \n Quick Impact Projects (QIPs) implemented by UN police personnel, such as the rehabilitation of local police infrastructure or the training of female police personnel, could also, where appropriate, become part of a CVR programme. \n If the eligibility criteria for a CVR programme require the handover of weapons and\/or ammunition, UN police personnel can provide support in a variety of ways including the preliminary assessment of weapons collected, the choice of temporary storage facilities for weapons and ammunition, the registration of weapons and ammunition, and the collection of photographic records. \n UN police personnel can also provide support to CVR programmes by diffusing key messages related to the programme. When relevant to the project at hand, UN police personnel can also provide lectures on civic education, multicultural tolerance, gender equality and respect for the rule of law.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -113599,7 +113599,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1936, - "Paragraph": "The role of CVR programmes within DDR processes is explained in IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction. CVR programmes can contribute to the ability of UN and State police personnel to improve local security conditions, especially outside capital cities, by exploring synergies between CVR and community-oriented policing. These possible synergies include: \\n The involvement of UN and\/or local State police representatives in the project advisory\/review committee or local selection committees. In particular, UN police personnel may be able to provide advice on sources of community violence that need to be addressed. \\n The development of CVR projects that reinforce State policing capacities. \\n Quick Impact Projects (QIPs) implemented by UN police personnel, such as the rehabilitation of local police infrastructure or the training of female police personnel, could also, where appropriate, become part of a CVR programme. \\n If the eligibility criteria for a CVR programme require the handover of weapons and\/or ammunition, UN police personnel can provide support in a variety of ways including the preliminary assessment of weapons collected, the choice of temporary storage facilities for weapons and ammunition, the registration of weapons and ammunition, and the collection of photographic records. \\n UN police personnel can also provide support to CVR programmes by diffusing key messages related to the programme. When relevant to the project at hand, UN police personnel can also provide lectures on civic education, multicultural tolerance, gender equality and respect for the rule of law.", + "Paragraph": "The role of CVR programmes within DDR processes is explained in IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction. CVR programmes can contribute to the ability of UN and State police personnel to improve local security conditions, especially outside capital cities, by exploring synergies between CVR and community-oriented policing. These possible synergies include: \n The involvement of UN and\/or local State police representatives in the project advisory\/review committee or local selection committees. In particular, UN police personnel may be able to provide advice on sources of community violence that need to be addressed. \n The development of CVR projects that reinforce State policing capacities. \n Quick Impact Projects (QIPs) implemented by UN police personnel, such as the rehabilitation of local police infrastructure or the training of female police personnel, could also, where appropriate, become part of a CVR programme. \n If the eligibility criteria for a CVR programme require the handover of weapons and\/or ammunition, UN police personnel can provide support in a variety of ways including the preliminary assessment of weapons collected, the choice of temporary storage facilities for weapons and ammunition, the registration of weapons and ammunition, and the collection of photographic records. \n UN police personnel can also provide support to CVR programmes by diffusing key messages related to the programme. When relevant to the project at hand, UN police personnel can also provide lectures on civic education, multicultural tolerance, gender equality and respect for the rule of law.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -113610,14 +113610,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Community violence reduction", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "These possible synergies include: \\n The involvement of UN and\/or local State police representatives in the project advisory\/review committee or local selection committees.", + "Sentence": "These possible synergies include: \n The involvement of UN and\/or local State police representatives in the project advisory\/review committee or local selection committees.", "newParagraph": "role cvr programme within ddr process explained iddrs 230 community violence reduction cvr programme contribute ability un state police personnel improve local security condition especially outside capital city exploring synergy cvr communityoriented policing possible synergy include n involvement un andor local state police representative project advisoryreview committee local selection committee particular un police personnel may able provide advice source community violence need addressed n development cvr project reinforce state policing capacity n quick impact project qips implemented un police personnel rehabilitation local police infrastructure training female police personnel could also appropriate become part cvr programme n eligibility criterion cvr programme require handover weapon andor ammunition un police personnel provide support variety way including preliminary assessment weapon collected choice temporary storage facility weapon ammunition registration weapon ammunition collection photographic record n un police personnel also provide support cvr programme diffusing key message related programme relevant project hand un police personnel also provide lecture civic education multicultural tolerance gender equality respect rule law", "ProcessedSent": "possible synergy include n involvement un andor local state police representative project advisoryreview committee local selection committee", "SentID": 6311 }, { "ParagraphID": 1936, - "Paragraph": "The role of CVR programmes within DDR processes is explained in IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction. CVR programmes can contribute to the ability of UN and State police personnel to improve local security conditions, especially outside capital cities, by exploring synergies between CVR and community-oriented policing. These possible synergies include: \\n The involvement of UN and\/or local State police representatives in the project advisory\/review committee or local selection committees. In particular, UN police personnel may be able to provide advice on sources of community violence that need to be addressed. \\n The development of CVR projects that reinforce State policing capacities. \\n Quick Impact Projects (QIPs) implemented by UN police personnel, such as the rehabilitation of local police infrastructure or the training of female police personnel, could also, where appropriate, become part of a CVR programme. \\n If the eligibility criteria for a CVR programme require the handover of weapons and\/or ammunition, UN police personnel can provide support in a variety of ways including the preliminary assessment of weapons collected, the choice of temporary storage facilities for weapons and ammunition, the registration of weapons and ammunition, and the collection of photographic records. \\n UN police personnel can also provide support to CVR programmes by diffusing key messages related to the programme. When relevant to the project at hand, UN police personnel can also provide lectures on civic education, multicultural tolerance, gender equality and respect for the rule of law.", + "Paragraph": "The role of CVR programmes within DDR processes is explained in IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction. CVR programmes can contribute to the ability of UN and State police personnel to improve local security conditions, especially outside capital cities, by exploring synergies between CVR and community-oriented policing. These possible synergies include: \n The involvement of UN and\/or local State police representatives in the project advisory\/review committee or local selection committees. In particular, UN police personnel may be able to provide advice on sources of community violence that need to be addressed. \n The development of CVR projects that reinforce State policing capacities. \n Quick Impact Projects (QIPs) implemented by UN police personnel, such as the rehabilitation of local police infrastructure or the training of female police personnel, could also, where appropriate, become part of a CVR programme. \n If the eligibility criteria for a CVR programme require the handover of weapons and\/or ammunition, UN police personnel can provide support in a variety of ways including the preliminary assessment of weapons collected, the choice of temporary storage facilities for weapons and ammunition, the registration of weapons and ammunition, and the collection of photographic records. \n UN police personnel can also provide support to CVR programmes by diffusing key messages related to the programme. When relevant to the project at hand, UN police personnel can also provide lectures on civic education, multicultural tolerance, gender equality and respect for the rule of law.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -113635,7 +113635,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1936, - "Paragraph": "The role of CVR programmes within DDR processes is explained in IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction. CVR programmes can contribute to the ability of UN and State police personnel to improve local security conditions, especially outside capital cities, by exploring synergies between CVR and community-oriented policing. These possible synergies include: \\n The involvement of UN and\/or local State police representatives in the project advisory\/review committee or local selection committees. In particular, UN police personnel may be able to provide advice on sources of community violence that need to be addressed. \\n The development of CVR projects that reinforce State policing capacities. \\n Quick Impact Projects (QIPs) implemented by UN police personnel, such as the rehabilitation of local police infrastructure or the training of female police personnel, could also, where appropriate, become part of a CVR programme. \\n If the eligibility criteria for a CVR programme require the handover of weapons and\/or ammunition, UN police personnel can provide support in a variety of ways including the preliminary assessment of weapons collected, the choice of temporary storage facilities for weapons and ammunition, the registration of weapons and ammunition, and the collection of photographic records. \\n UN police personnel can also provide support to CVR programmes by diffusing key messages related to the programme. When relevant to the project at hand, UN police personnel can also provide lectures on civic education, multicultural tolerance, gender equality and respect for the rule of law.", + "Paragraph": "The role of CVR programmes within DDR processes is explained in IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction. CVR programmes can contribute to the ability of UN and State police personnel to improve local security conditions, especially outside capital cities, by exploring synergies between CVR and community-oriented policing. These possible synergies include: \n The involvement of UN and\/or local State police representatives in the project advisory\/review committee or local selection committees. In particular, UN police personnel may be able to provide advice on sources of community violence that need to be addressed. \n The development of CVR projects that reinforce State policing capacities. \n Quick Impact Projects (QIPs) implemented by UN police personnel, such as the rehabilitation of local police infrastructure or the training of female police personnel, could also, where appropriate, become part of a CVR programme. \n If the eligibility criteria for a CVR programme require the handover of weapons and\/or ammunition, UN police personnel can provide support in a variety of ways including the preliminary assessment of weapons collected, the choice of temporary storage facilities for weapons and ammunition, the registration of weapons and ammunition, and the collection of photographic records. \n UN police personnel can also provide support to CVR programmes by diffusing key messages related to the programme. When relevant to the project at hand, UN police personnel can also provide lectures on civic education, multicultural tolerance, gender equality and respect for the rule of law.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -113646,14 +113646,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Community violence reduction", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The development of CVR projects that reinforce State policing capacities.", + "Sentence": "\n The development of CVR projects that reinforce State policing capacities.", "newParagraph": "role cvr programme within ddr process explained iddrs 230 community violence reduction cvr programme contribute ability un state police personnel improve local security condition especially outside capital city exploring synergy cvr communityoriented policing possible synergy include n involvement un andor local state police representative project advisoryreview committee local selection committee particular un police personnel may able provide advice source community violence need addressed n development cvr project reinforce state policing capacity n quick impact project qips implemented un police personnel rehabilitation local police infrastructure training female police personnel could also appropriate become part cvr programme n eligibility criterion cvr programme require handover weapon andor ammunition un police personnel provide support variety way including preliminary assessment weapon collected choice temporary storage facility weapon ammunition registration weapon ammunition collection photographic record n un police personnel also provide support cvr programme diffusing key message related programme relevant project hand un police personnel also provide lecture civic education multicultural tolerance gender equality respect rule law", "ProcessedSent": "n development cvr project reinforce state policing capacity", "SentID": 6313 }, { "ParagraphID": 1936, - "Paragraph": "The role of CVR programmes within DDR processes is explained in IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction. CVR programmes can contribute to the ability of UN and State police personnel to improve local security conditions, especially outside capital cities, by exploring synergies between CVR and community-oriented policing. These possible synergies include: \\n The involvement of UN and\/or local State police representatives in the project advisory\/review committee or local selection committees. In particular, UN police personnel may be able to provide advice on sources of community violence that need to be addressed. \\n The development of CVR projects that reinforce State policing capacities. \\n Quick Impact Projects (QIPs) implemented by UN police personnel, such as the rehabilitation of local police infrastructure or the training of female police personnel, could also, where appropriate, become part of a CVR programme. \\n If the eligibility criteria for a CVR programme require the handover of weapons and\/or ammunition, UN police personnel can provide support in a variety of ways including the preliminary assessment of weapons collected, the choice of temporary storage facilities for weapons and ammunition, the registration of weapons and ammunition, and the collection of photographic records. \\n UN police personnel can also provide support to CVR programmes by diffusing key messages related to the programme. When relevant to the project at hand, UN police personnel can also provide lectures on civic education, multicultural tolerance, gender equality and respect for the rule of law.", + "Paragraph": "The role of CVR programmes within DDR processes is explained in IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction. CVR programmes can contribute to the ability of UN and State police personnel to improve local security conditions, especially outside capital cities, by exploring synergies between CVR and community-oriented policing. These possible synergies include: \n The involvement of UN and\/or local State police representatives in the project advisory\/review committee or local selection committees. In particular, UN police personnel may be able to provide advice on sources of community violence that need to be addressed. \n The development of CVR projects that reinforce State policing capacities. \n Quick Impact Projects (QIPs) implemented by UN police personnel, such as the rehabilitation of local police infrastructure or the training of female police personnel, could also, where appropriate, become part of a CVR programme. \n If the eligibility criteria for a CVR programme require the handover of weapons and\/or ammunition, UN police personnel can provide support in a variety of ways including the preliminary assessment of weapons collected, the choice of temporary storage facilities for weapons and ammunition, the registration of weapons and ammunition, and the collection of photographic records. \n UN police personnel can also provide support to CVR programmes by diffusing key messages related to the programme. When relevant to the project at hand, UN police personnel can also provide lectures on civic education, multicultural tolerance, gender equality and respect for the rule of law.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -113664,14 +113664,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Community violence reduction", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Quick Impact Projects (QIPs) implemented by UN police personnel, such as the rehabilitation of local police infrastructure or the training of female police personnel, could also, where appropriate, become part of a CVR programme.", + "Sentence": "\n Quick Impact Projects (QIPs) implemented by UN police personnel, such as the rehabilitation of local police infrastructure or the training of female police personnel, could also, where appropriate, become part of a CVR programme.", "newParagraph": "role cvr programme within ddr process explained iddrs 230 community violence reduction cvr programme contribute ability un state police personnel improve local security condition especially outside capital city exploring synergy cvr communityoriented policing possible synergy include n involvement un andor local state police representative project advisoryreview committee local selection committee particular un police personnel may able provide advice source community violence need addressed n development cvr project reinforce state policing capacity n quick impact project qips implemented un police personnel rehabilitation local police infrastructure training female police personnel could also appropriate become part cvr programme n eligibility criterion cvr programme require handover weapon andor ammunition un police personnel provide support variety way including preliminary assessment weapon collected choice temporary storage facility weapon ammunition registration weapon ammunition collection photographic record n un police personnel also provide support cvr programme diffusing key message related programme relevant project hand un police personnel also provide lecture civic education multicultural tolerance gender equality respect rule law", "ProcessedSent": "n quick impact project qips implemented un police personnel rehabilitation local police infrastructure training female police personnel could also appropriate become part cvr programme", "SentID": 6314 }, { "ParagraphID": 1936, - "Paragraph": "The role of CVR programmes within DDR processes is explained in IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction. CVR programmes can contribute to the ability of UN and State police personnel to improve local security conditions, especially outside capital cities, by exploring synergies between CVR and community-oriented policing. These possible synergies include: \\n The involvement of UN and\/or local State police representatives in the project advisory\/review committee or local selection committees. In particular, UN police personnel may be able to provide advice on sources of community violence that need to be addressed. \\n The development of CVR projects that reinforce State policing capacities. \\n Quick Impact Projects (QIPs) implemented by UN police personnel, such as the rehabilitation of local police infrastructure or the training of female police personnel, could also, where appropriate, become part of a CVR programme. \\n If the eligibility criteria for a CVR programme require the handover of weapons and\/or ammunition, UN police personnel can provide support in a variety of ways including the preliminary assessment of weapons collected, the choice of temporary storage facilities for weapons and ammunition, the registration of weapons and ammunition, and the collection of photographic records. \\n UN police personnel can also provide support to CVR programmes by diffusing key messages related to the programme. When relevant to the project at hand, UN police personnel can also provide lectures on civic education, multicultural tolerance, gender equality and respect for the rule of law.", + "Paragraph": "The role of CVR programmes within DDR processes is explained in IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction. CVR programmes can contribute to the ability of UN and State police personnel to improve local security conditions, especially outside capital cities, by exploring synergies between CVR and community-oriented policing. These possible synergies include: \n The involvement of UN and\/or local State police representatives in the project advisory\/review committee or local selection committees. In particular, UN police personnel may be able to provide advice on sources of community violence that need to be addressed. \n The development of CVR projects that reinforce State policing capacities. \n Quick Impact Projects (QIPs) implemented by UN police personnel, such as the rehabilitation of local police infrastructure or the training of female police personnel, could also, where appropriate, become part of a CVR programme. \n If the eligibility criteria for a CVR programme require the handover of weapons and\/or ammunition, UN police personnel can provide support in a variety of ways including the preliminary assessment of weapons collected, the choice of temporary storage facilities for weapons and ammunition, the registration of weapons and ammunition, and the collection of photographic records. \n UN police personnel can also provide support to CVR programmes by diffusing key messages related to the programme. When relevant to the project at hand, UN police personnel can also provide lectures on civic education, multicultural tolerance, gender equality and respect for the rule of law.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -113682,14 +113682,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Community violence reduction", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n If the eligibility criteria for a CVR programme require the handover of weapons and\/or ammunition, UN police personnel can provide support in a variety of ways including the preliminary assessment of weapons collected, the choice of temporary storage facilities for weapons and ammunition, the registration of weapons and ammunition, and the collection of photographic records.", + "Sentence": "\n If the eligibility criteria for a CVR programme require the handover of weapons and\/or ammunition, UN police personnel can provide support in a variety of ways including the preliminary assessment of weapons collected, the choice of temporary storage facilities for weapons and ammunition, the registration of weapons and ammunition, and the collection of photographic records.", "newParagraph": "role cvr programme within ddr process explained iddrs 230 community violence reduction cvr programme contribute ability un state police personnel improve local security condition especially outside capital city exploring synergy cvr communityoriented policing possible synergy include n involvement un andor local state police representative project advisoryreview committee local selection committee particular un police personnel may able provide advice source community violence need addressed n development cvr project reinforce state policing capacity n quick impact project qips implemented un police personnel rehabilitation local police infrastructure training female police personnel could also appropriate become part cvr programme n eligibility criterion cvr programme require handover weapon andor ammunition un police personnel provide support variety way including preliminary assessment weapon collected choice temporary storage facility weapon ammunition registration weapon ammunition collection photographic record n un police personnel also provide support cvr programme diffusing key message related programme relevant project hand un police personnel also provide lecture civic education multicultural tolerance gender equality respect rule law", "ProcessedSent": "n eligibility criterion cvr programme require handover weapon andor ammunition un police personnel provide support variety way including preliminary assessment weapon collected choice temporary storage facility weapon ammunition registration weapon ammunition collection photographic record", "SentID": 6315 }, { "ParagraphID": 1936, - "Paragraph": "The role of CVR programmes within DDR processes is explained in IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction. CVR programmes can contribute to the ability of UN and State police personnel to improve local security conditions, especially outside capital cities, by exploring synergies between CVR and community-oriented policing. These possible synergies include: \\n The involvement of UN and\/or local State police representatives in the project advisory\/review committee or local selection committees. In particular, UN police personnel may be able to provide advice on sources of community violence that need to be addressed. \\n The development of CVR projects that reinforce State policing capacities. \\n Quick Impact Projects (QIPs) implemented by UN police personnel, such as the rehabilitation of local police infrastructure or the training of female police personnel, could also, where appropriate, become part of a CVR programme. \\n If the eligibility criteria for a CVR programme require the handover of weapons and\/or ammunition, UN police personnel can provide support in a variety of ways including the preliminary assessment of weapons collected, the choice of temporary storage facilities for weapons and ammunition, the registration of weapons and ammunition, and the collection of photographic records. \\n UN police personnel can also provide support to CVR programmes by diffusing key messages related to the programme. When relevant to the project at hand, UN police personnel can also provide lectures on civic education, multicultural tolerance, gender equality and respect for the rule of law.", + "Paragraph": "The role of CVR programmes within DDR processes is explained in IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction. CVR programmes can contribute to the ability of UN and State police personnel to improve local security conditions, especially outside capital cities, by exploring synergies between CVR and community-oriented policing. These possible synergies include: \n The involvement of UN and\/or local State police representatives in the project advisory\/review committee or local selection committees. In particular, UN police personnel may be able to provide advice on sources of community violence that need to be addressed. \n The development of CVR projects that reinforce State policing capacities. \n Quick Impact Projects (QIPs) implemented by UN police personnel, such as the rehabilitation of local police infrastructure or the training of female police personnel, could also, where appropriate, become part of a CVR programme. \n If the eligibility criteria for a CVR programme require the handover of weapons and\/or ammunition, UN police personnel can provide support in a variety of ways including the preliminary assessment of weapons collected, the choice of temporary storage facilities for weapons and ammunition, the registration of weapons and ammunition, and the collection of photographic records. \n UN police personnel can also provide support to CVR programmes by diffusing key messages related to the programme. When relevant to the project at hand, UN police personnel can also provide lectures on civic education, multicultural tolerance, gender equality and respect for the rule of law.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -113700,14 +113700,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Community violence reduction", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n UN police personnel can also provide support to CVR programmes by diffusing key messages related to the programme.", + "Sentence": "\n UN police personnel can also provide support to CVR programmes by diffusing key messages related to the programme.", "newParagraph": "role cvr programme within ddr process explained iddrs 230 community violence reduction cvr programme contribute ability un state police personnel improve local security condition especially outside capital city exploring synergy cvr communityoriented policing possible synergy include n involvement un andor local state police representative project advisoryreview committee local selection committee particular un police personnel may able provide advice source community violence need addressed n development cvr project reinforce state policing capacity n quick impact project qips implemented un police personnel rehabilitation local police infrastructure training female police personnel could also appropriate become part cvr programme n eligibility criterion cvr programme require handover weapon andor ammunition un police personnel provide support variety way including preliminary assessment weapon collected choice temporary storage facility weapon ammunition registration weapon ammunition collection photographic record n un police personnel also provide support cvr programme diffusing key message related programme relevant project hand un police personnel also provide lecture civic education multicultural tolerance gender equality respect rule law", "ProcessedSent": "n un police personnel also provide support cvr programme diffusing key message related programme", "SentID": 6316 }, { "ParagraphID": 1936, - "Paragraph": "The role of CVR programmes within DDR processes is explained in IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction. CVR programmes can contribute to the ability of UN and State police personnel to improve local security conditions, especially outside capital cities, by exploring synergies between CVR and community-oriented policing. These possible synergies include: \\n The involvement of UN and\/or local State police representatives in the project advisory\/review committee or local selection committees. In particular, UN police personnel may be able to provide advice on sources of community violence that need to be addressed. \\n The development of CVR projects that reinforce State policing capacities. \\n Quick Impact Projects (QIPs) implemented by UN police personnel, such as the rehabilitation of local police infrastructure or the training of female police personnel, could also, where appropriate, become part of a CVR programme. \\n If the eligibility criteria for a CVR programme require the handover of weapons and\/or ammunition, UN police personnel can provide support in a variety of ways including the preliminary assessment of weapons collected, the choice of temporary storage facilities for weapons and ammunition, the registration of weapons and ammunition, and the collection of photographic records. \\n UN police personnel can also provide support to CVR programmes by diffusing key messages related to the programme. When relevant to the project at hand, UN police personnel can also provide lectures on civic education, multicultural tolerance, gender equality and respect for the rule of law.", + "Paragraph": "The role of CVR programmes within DDR processes is explained in IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction. CVR programmes can contribute to the ability of UN and State police personnel to improve local security conditions, especially outside capital cities, by exploring synergies between CVR and community-oriented policing. These possible synergies include: \n The involvement of UN and\/or local State police representatives in the project advisory\/review committee or local selection committees. In particular, UN police personnel may be able to provide advice on sources of community violence that need to be addressed. \n The development of CVR projects that reinforce State policing capacities. \n Quick Impact Projects (QIPs) implemented by UN police personnel, such as the rehabilitation of local police infrastructure or the training of female police personnel, could also, where appropriate, become part of a CVR programme. \n If the eligibility criteria for a CVR programme require the handover of weapons and\/or ammunition, UN police personnel can provide support in a variety of ways including the preliminary assessment of weapons collected, the choice of temporary storage facilities for weapons and ammunition, the registration of weapons and ammunition, and the collection of photographic records. \n UN police personnel can also provide support to CVR programmes by diffusing key messages related to the programme. When relevant to the project at hand, UN police personnel can also provide lectures on civic education, multicultural tolerance, gender equality and respect for the rule of law.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -114337,7 +114337,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1948, - "Paragraph": "1 See https:\/\/elearning.un.org\/CONT\/GEN\/CS\/UNHR_V3\/Module_01\/story_content\/external_files\/4.11_H RDDP%20Guidance%20Note%202015.pdf \\n 2 See also DPKO-DFS Policy on United Nations Police in Peacekeeping Operations and Special Political Missions, Ref. 2014.01, and DPKO-DFS Guidelines on Police Operations in United Nations Peacekeeping Operations and Special Political Missions, Ref. 2015.15.", + "Paragraph": "1 See https:\/\/elearning.un.org\/CONT\/GEN\/CS\/UNHR_V3\/Module_01\/story_content\/external_files\/4.11_H RDDP%20Guidance%20Note%202015.pdf \n 2 See also DPKO-DFS Policy on United Nations Police in Peacekeeping Operations and Special Political Missions, Ref. 2014.01, and DPKO-DFS Guidelines on Police Operations in United Nations Peacekeeping Operations and Special Political Missions, Ref. 2015.15.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -114348,14 +114348,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "1 See https:\/\/elearning.un.org\/CONT\/GEN\/CS\/UNHR_V3\/Module_01\/story_content\/external_files\/4.11_H RDDP%20Guidance%20Note%202015.pdf \\n 2 See also DPKO-DFS Policy on United Nations Police in Peacekeeping Operations and Special Political Missions, Ref.", + "Sentence": "1 See https:\/\/elearning.un.org\/CONT\/GEN\/CS\/UNHR_V3\/Module_01\/story_content\/external_files\/4.11_H RDDP%20Guidance%20Note%202015.pdf \n 2 See also DPKO-DFS Policy on United Nations Police in Peacekeeping Operations and Special Political Missions, Ref.", "newParagraph": "1 see httpselearningunorgcontgencsunhrv3module01storycontentexternalfiles411h rddp20guidance20note202015pdf n 2 see also dpkodfs policy united nation police peacekeeping operation special political mission ref 201401 dpkodfs guideline police operation united nation peacekeeping operation special political mission ref 201515", "ProcessedSent": "1 see httpselearningunorgcontgencsunhrv3module01storycontentexternalfiles411h rddp20guidance20note202015pdf n 2 see also dpkodfs policy united nation police peacekeeping operation special political mission ref", "SentID": 6352 }, { "ParagraphID": 1948, - "Paragraph": "1 See https:\/\/elearning.un.org\/CONT\/GEN\/CS\/UNHR_V3\/Module_01\/story_content\/external_files\/4.11_H RDDP%20Guidance%20Note%202015.pdf \\n 2 See also DPKO-DFS Policy on United Nations Police in Peacekeeping Operations and Special Political Missions, Ref. 2014.01, and DPKO-DFS Guidelines on Police Operations in United Nations Peacekeeping Operations and Special Political Missions, Ref. 2015.15.", + "Paragraph": "1 See https:\/\/elearning.un.org\/CONT\/GEN\/CS\/UNHR_V3\/Module_01\/story_content\/external_files\/4.11_H RDDP%20Guidance%20Note%202015.pdf \n 2 See also DPKO-DFS Policy on United Nations Police in Peacekeeping Operations and Special Political Missions, Ref. 2014.01, and DPKO-DFS Guidelines on Police Operations in United Nations Peacekeeping Operations and Special Political Missions, Ref. 2015.15.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -114373,7 +114373,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1948, - "Paragraph": "1 See https:\/\/elearning.un.org\/CONT\/GEN\/CS\/UNHR_V3\/Module_01\/story_content\/external_files\/4.11_H RDDP%20Guidance%20Note%202015.pdf \\n 2 See also DPKO-DFS Policy on United Nations Police in Peacekeeping Operations and Special Political Missions, Ref. 2014.01, and DPKO-DFS Guidelines on Police Operations in United Nations Peacekeeping Operations and Special Political Missions, Ref. 2015.15.", + "Paragraph": "1 See https:\/\/elearning.un.org\/CONT\/GEN\/CS\/UNHR_V3\/Module_01\/story_content\/external_files\/4.11_H RDDP%20Guidance%20Note%202015.pdf \n 2 See also DPKO-DFS Policy on United Nations Police in Peacekeeping Operations and Special Political Missions, Ref. 2014.01, and DPKO-DFS Guidelines on Police Operations in United Nations Peacekeeping Operations and Special Political Missions, Ref. 2015.15.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -114679,7 +114679,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1954, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -114697,7 +114697,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1954, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -114708,7 +114708,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may must used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "ProcessedSent": "use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "SentID": 6372 @@ -116191,7 +116191,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1973, - "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", + "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116209,7 +116209,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1973, - "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", + "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116220,14 +116220,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available.", + "Sentence": "There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available.", "newParagraph": "pisc strategy outline ddr process specific context consists public information activity contribute changing attitude behaviour strategic communication intervention four overall objective pisc n inform stakeholder ddr process public information includes providing tailored key message various stakeholder go deposit weapon eligible ddr reintegration option available result ddr participant beneficiary stakeholder made fully aware ddr process involves kind messaging also serf purpose making community understand ddr process involve importantly serf manage expectation clearly defining fall within outside scope ddr ddr process made different combination ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support message clearly define eligible given historically woman girl always received information male combatant may purposely hidden male commander may selfdemobilized essential pisc strategy take consideration specific information channel required reach important note however pi activity cannot compensate faulty ddr process convince people safe participate combatant willing disarm whatever reason pi alone persuade sitatutions strategic communication may used create condition successful ddr process n mitigate negative impact misinformation disinformation strategic communication important understand conflict actor armed group stakeholder respond react andor provide alternative message disseminated support ddr process volatile conflict postconflict context ddr take place profited war believe political objective met may wish see ddr process succeed may access radio station make broadcast may distribute pamphlet material spreading hate message incite violence undermine un andor former warring party spoiler likely access online platform blog social medium easily reach influence large number people therefore critical pisc extends beyond merely providing information public comprehensive pisc strategy shall designed identify address source misinformation disinformation develop tailored strategic communication intervention implementation iterative whereby message deployed provide alternative narrative specific misinformation disinformation may hamper implementation ddr process n sensitize member armed force group ddr process strategic communication strategic communication intervention used sensitize potential ddr participant beyond informing stakeholder beneficiary participant detail ddr process beyond mitigating negative impact misinformation disinformation strategic communication used influence decision individual considering leaving armed force group including providing necessary information leave safely transformative objective strategic communication intervention context specific based concrete understanding political aspect conflict grievance member armed force group analysis potential motivation individual joinleave warring party strategic communication intervention may include message targeting active combatant encourage participation ddr process example story testimonial excombatants positive ddr impact story may also include communication campaign aimed preventing recruitment potential role national authority also assessed analysis possible national authority lead strategic communication n transform attitude community foster ddr strategic communication reintegration andor cvr programme often crucial element ddr process see iddrs 230 community violence reduction iddrs 430 reintegration strategic communication intervention help create condition facilitate peacebuilding social cohesion encourage peaceful return former member armed force group civilian life community homogeneous entity individual within single community may differing attitude towards return former member armed force group example hit hardest conflict may likely negative perception returning combatant others may simply happy reunited family member ddr process may also negatively perceived rewarding combatant necessary strategic communication used mean transform perception community combat stigmatization hate speech marginalization discrimination former member armed force group woman girl often stigmatized receiving community pisc play pivotal role creating supportive environment pisc also utilized promote nonviolent behaviour including engaging men boy ally promoting positive masculine norm see iddrs 510 woman gender ddr finally pisc also used destigmatize mental health impact conflict raise awareness psychosocial support service", "ProcessedSent": "four overall objective pisc n inform stakeholder ddr process public information includes providing tailored key message various stakeholder go deposit weapon eligible ddr reintegration option available", "SentID": 6456 }, { "ParagraphID": 1973, - "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", + "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116245,7 +116245,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1973, - "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", + "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116263,7 +116263,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1973, - "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", + "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116281,7 +116281,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1973, - "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", + "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116299,7 +116299,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1973, - "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", + "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116317,7 +116317,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1973, - "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", + "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116335,7 +116335,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1973, - "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", + "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116353,7 +116353,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1973, - "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", + "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116371,7 +116371,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1973, - "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", + "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116382,14 +116382,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process.", + "Sentence": "\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process.", "newParagraph": "pisc strategy outline ddr process specific context consists public information activity contribute changing attitude behaviour strategic communication intervention four overall objective pisc n inform stakeholder ddr process public information includes providing tailored key message various stakeholder go deposit weapon eligible ddr reintegration option available result ddr participant beneficiary stakeholder made fully aware ddr process involves kind messaging also serf purpose making community understand ddr process involve importantly serf manage expectation clearly defining fall within outside scope ddr ddr process made different combination ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support message clearly define eligible given historically woman girl always received information male combatant may purposely hidden male commander may selfdemobilized essential pisc strategy take consideration specific information channel required reach important note however pi activity cannot compensate faulty ddr process convince people safe participate combatant willing disarm whatever reason pi alone persuade sitatutions strategic communication may used create condition successful ddr process n mitigate negative impact misinformation disinformation strategic communication important understand conflict actor armed group stakeholder respond react andor provide alternative message disseminated support ddr process volatile conflict postconflict context ddr take place profited war believe political objective met may wish see ddr process succeed may access radio station make broadcast may distribute pamphlet material spreading hate message incite violence undermine un andor former warring party spoiler likely access online platform blog social medium easily reach influence large number people therefore critical pisc extends beyond merely providing information public comprehensive pisc strategy shall designed identify address source misinformation disinformation develop tailored strategic communication intervention implementation iterative whereby message deployed provide alternative narrative specific misinformation disinformation may hamper implementation ddr process n sensitize member armed force group ddr process strategic communication strategic communication intervention used sensitize potential ddr participant beyond informing stakeholder beneficiary participant detail ddr process beyond mitigating negative impact misinformation disinformation strategic communication used influence decision individual considering leaving armed force group including providing necessary information leave safely transformative objective strategic communication intervention context specific based concrete understanding political aspect conflict grievance member armed force group analysis potential motivation individual joinleave warring party strategic communication intervention may include message targeting active combatant encourage participation ddr process example story testimonial excombatants positive ddr impact story may also include communication campaign aimed preventing recruitment potential role national authority also assessed analysis possible national authority lead strategic communication n transform attitude community foster ddr strategic communication reintegration andor cvr programme often crucial element ddr process see iddrs 230 community violence reduction iddrs 430 reintegration strategic communication intervention help create condition facilitate peacebuilding social cohesion encourage peaceful return former member armed force group civilian life community homogeneous entity individual within single community may differing attitude towards return former member armed force group example hit hardest conflict may likely negative perception returning combatant others may simply happy reunited family member ddr process may also negatively perceived rewarding combatant necessary strategic communication used mean transform perception community combat stigmatization hate speech marginalization discrimination former member armed force group woman girl often stigmatized receiving community pisc play pivotal role creating supportive environment pisc also utilized promote nonviolent behaviour including engaging men boy ally promoting positive masculine norm see iddrs 510 woman gender ddr finally pisc also used destigmatize mental health impact conflict raise awareness psychosocial support service", "ProcessedSent": "n mitigate negative impact misinformation disinformation strategic communication important understand conflict actor armed group stakeholder respond react andor provide alternative message disseminated support ddr process", "SentID": 6465 }, { "ParagraphID": 1973, - "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", + "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116407,7 +116407,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1973, - "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", + "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116425,7 +116425,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1973, - "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", + "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116443,7 +116443,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1973, - "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", + "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116461,7 +116461,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1973, - "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", + "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116479,7 +116479,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1973, - "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", + "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116497,7 +116497,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1973, - "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", + "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116508,14 +116508,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants.", + "Sentence": "\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants.", "newParagraph": "pisc strategy outline ddr process specific context consists public information activity contribute changing attitude behaviour strategic communication intervention four overall objective pisc n inform stakeholder ddr process public information includes providing tailored key message various stakeholder go deposit weapon eligible ddr reintegration option available result ddr participant beneficiary stakeholder made fully aware ddr process involves kind messaging also serf purpose making community understand ddr process involve importantly serf manage expectation clearly defining fall within outside scope ddr ddr process made different combination ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support message clearly define eligible given historically woman girl always received information male combatant may purposely hidden male commander may selfdemobilized essential pisc strategy take consideration specific information channel required reach important note however pi activity cannot compensate faulty ddr process convince people safe participate combatant willing disarm whatever reason pi alone persuade sitatutions strategic communication may used create condition successful ddr process n mitigate negative impact misinformation disinformation strategic communication important understand conflict actor armed group stakeholder respond react andor provide alternative message disseminated support ddr process volatile conflict postconflict context ddr take place profited war believe political objective met may wish see ddr process succeed may access radio station make broadcast may distribute pamphlet material spreading hate message incite violence undermine un andor former warring party spoiler likely access online platform blog social medium easily reach influence large number people therefore critical pisc extends beyond merely providing information public comprehensive pisc strategy shall designed identify address source misinformation disinformation develop tailored strategic communication intervention implementation iterative whereby message deployed provide alternative narrative specific misinformation disinformation may hamper implementation ddr process n sensitize member armed force group ddr process strategic communication strategic communication intervention used sensitize potential ddr participant beyond informing stakeholder beneficiary participant detail ddr process beyond mitigating negative impact misinformation disinformation strategic communication used influence decision individual considering leaving armed force group including providing necessary information leave safely transformative objective strategic communication intervention context specific based concrete understanding political aspect conflict grievance member armed force group analysis potential motivation individual joinleave warring party strategic communication intervention may include message targeting active combatant encourage participation ddr process example story testimonial excombatants positive ddr impact story may also include communication campaign aimed preventing recruitment potential role national authority also assessed analysis possible national authority lead strategic communication n transform attitude community foster ddr strategic communication reintegration andor cvr programme often crucial element ddr process see iddrs 230 community violence reduction iddrs 430 reintegration strategic communication intervention help create condition facilitate peacebuilding social cohesion encourage peaceful return former member armed force group civilian life community homogeneous entity individual within single community may differing attitude towards return former member armed force group example hit hardest conflict may likely negative perception returning combatant others may simply happy reunited family member ddr process may also negatively perceived rewarding combatant necessary strategic communication used mean transform perception community combat stigmatization hate speech marginalization discrimination former member armed force group woman girl often stigmatized receiving community pisc play pivotal role creating supportive environment pisc also utilized promote nonviolent behaviour including engaging men boy ally promoting positive masculine norm see iddrs 510 woman gender ddr finally pisc also used destigmatize mental health impact conflict raise awareness psychosocial support service", "ProcessedSent": "n sensitize member armed force group ddr process strategic communication strategic communication intervention used sensitize potential ddr participant", "SentID": 6472 }, { "ParagraphID": 1973, - "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", + "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116533,7 +116533,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1973, - "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", + "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116551,7 +116551,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1973, - "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", + "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116569,7 +116569,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1973, - "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", + "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116587,7 +116587,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1973, - "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", + "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116605,7 +116605,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1973, - "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", + "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116616,14 +116616,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration).", + "Sentence": "\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration).", "newParagraph": "pisc strategy outline ddr process specific context consists public information activity contribute changing attitude behaviour strategic communication intervention four overall objective pisc n inform stakeholder ddr process public information includes providing tailored key message various stakeholder go deposit weapon eligible ddr reintegration option available result ddr participant beneficiary stakeholder made fully aware ddr process involves kind messaging also serf purpose making community understand ddr process involve importantly serf manage expectation clearly defining fall within outside scope ddr ddr process made different combination ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support message clearly define eligible given historically woman girl always received information male combatant may purposely hidden male commander may selfdemobilized essential pisc strategy take consideration specific information channel required reach important note however pi activity cannot compensate faulty ddr process convince people safe participate combatant willing disarm whatever reason pi alone persuade sitatutions strategic communication may used create condition successful ddr process n mitigate negative impact misinformation disinformation strategic communication important understand conflict actor armed group stakeholder respond react andor provide alternative message disseminated support ddr process volatile conflict postconflict context ddr take place profited war believe political objective met may wish see ddr process succeed may access radio station make broadcast may distribute pamphlet material spreading hate message incite violence undermine un andor former warring party spoiler likely access online platform blog social medium easily reach influence large number people therefore critical pisc extends beyond merely providing information public comprehensive pisc strategy shall designed identify address source misinformation disinformation develop tailored strategic communication intervention implementation iterative whereby message deployed provide alternative narrative specific misinformation disinformation may hamper implementation ddr process n sensitize member armed force group ddr process strategic communication strategic communication intervention used sensitize potential ddr participant beyond informing stakeholder beneficiary participant detail ddr process beyond mitigating negative impact misinformation disinformation strategic communication used influence decision individual considering leaving armed force group including providing necessary information leave safely transformative objective strategic communication intervention context specific based concrete understanding political aspect conflict grievance member armed force group analysis potential motivation individual joinleave warring party strategic communication intervention may include message targeting active combatant encourage participation ddr process example story testimonial excombatants positive ddr impact story may also include communication campaign aimed preventing recruitment potential role national authority also assessed analysis possible national authority lead strategic communication n transform attitude community foster ddr strategic communication reintegration andor cvr programme often crucial element ddr process see iddrs 230 community violence reduction iddrs 430 reintegration strategic communication intervention help create condition facilitate peacebuilding social cohesion encourage peaceful return former member armed force group civilian life community homogeneous entity individual within single community may differing attitude towards return former member armed force group example hit hardest conflict may likely negative perception returning combatant others may simply happy reunited family member ddr process may also negatively perceived rewarding combatant necessary strategic communication used mean transform perception community combat stigmatization hate speech marginalization discrimination former member armed force group woman girl often stigmatized receiving community pisc play pivotal role creating supportive environment pisc also utilized promote nonviolent behaviour including engaging men boy ally promoting positive masculine norm see iddrs 510 woman gender ddr finally pisc also used destigmatize mental health impact conflict raise awareness psychosocial support service", "ProcessedSent": "n transform attitude community foster ddr strategic communication reintegration andor cvr programme often crucial element ddr process see iddrs 230 community violence reduction iddrs 430 reintegration", "SentID": 6478 }, { "ParagraphID": 1973, - "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", + "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116641,7 +116641,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1973, - "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", + "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116659,7 +116659,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1973, - "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", + "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116677,7 +116677,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1973, - "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", + "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116695,7 +116695,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1973, - "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", + "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116713,7 +116713,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1973, - "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", + "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116731,7 +116731,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1973, - "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", + "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116749,7 +116749,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1973, - "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", + "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116767,7 +116767,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1973, - "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \\n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \\n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \\n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \\n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", + "Paragraph": "A PI\/SC strategy should outline what the DDR process in the specific context consists of through public information activities and contribute to changing attitudes and behaviour through strategic communication interventions. There are four overall objectives of PI\/SC: \n To inform stakeholders about the DDR process (public information): This includes providing tailored key messages to various stakeholders, such as where to go, when to deposit weapons, who is eligible for DDR and what reintegration options are available. The result is that DDR participants, beneficiaries and other stakeholders are made fully aware of what the DDR process involves. This kind of messaging also serves the purpose of making communities understand how the DDR process will involve them. Most importantly, it serves to manage expectations, clearly defining what falls within and outside the scope of DDR. If the DDR process is made up of different combinations of DDR programmes, DDR-related tools or reintegration support, messages should clearly define who is eligible for what. Given that, historically, women and girls have not always received the same information as male combatants, as they may be purposely hidden by male commanders or may have \u2018self-demobilized\u2019, it is essential that PI\/SC strategies take into consideration the specific information channels required to reach them. It is important to note, however, that PI activities cannot compensate for a faulty DDR process, or on their own convince people that it is safe to participate. If combatants are not willing to disarm, for whatever reason, PI alone will not persuade them to do so. In such sitatutions, strategic communications may be used to create the conditions for a successful DDR process. \n To mitigate the negative impact of misinformation and disinformation (strategic communication): It is important to understand how conflict actors such as armed groups and other stakeholders respond, react to and\/or provide alternative messages that are disseminated in support of the DDR process. In the volatile conflict and post-conflict contexts in which DDR takes place, those who profit(ed) from war or who believe their political objectives have not been met may not wish to see the DDR process succeed. They may have access to radio stations from which they can make broadcasts or may distribute pamphlets and other materials spreading \u2018hate\u2019 or messages that incite violence and undermine the UN and\/or some of the (former) warring parties. These spoilers likely will have access to online platforms, such as blogs and social media, where they can easily reach and influence a large number of people. It is therefore critical that PI\/SC extends beyond merely providing information to the public. A comprehensive PI\/SC strategy shall be designed to identify and address sources of misinformation and disinformation and to develop tailored strategic communication interventions. Implementation should be iterative, whereby messages are deployed to provide alternative narratives for specific misinformation or disinformation that may hamper the implementation of a DDR process. \n To sensitize members of armed forces and groups to the DDR process (strategic communication): Strategic communication interventions can be used to sensitize potential DDR participants. That is, beyond informing stakeholders, beneficiaries and participants about the details of the DDR process and beyond mitigating the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation, strategic communication can be used to influence the decisions of individuals who are considering leaving their armed force or group including providing the necessary information to leave safely. The transformative objective of strategic communication interventions should be context specific and based on a concrete understanding of the political aspects of the conflict, the grievances of members of armed forces and groups, and an analysis of the potential motivations of individuals to join\/leave warring parties. Strategic communication interventions may include messages targeting active combatants to encourage their participation in the DDR process, for example, stories and testimonials from ex-combatants and other positive DDR impact stories. They may also include communication campaigns aimed at preventing recruitment. The potential role of the national authorities should also be assessed through analysis and where possible, national authorities should lead the strategic communication. \n To transform attitudes in communities so as to foster DDR (strategic communication): Reintegration and\/or CVR programmes are often crucial elements of DDR processes (see IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration). Strategic communication interventions can help to create conditions that facilitate peacebuilding and social cohesion and encourage the peaceful return of former members of armed forces and groups to civilian life. Communities are not homogeneous entities, and individuals within a single community may have differing attitudes towards the return of former members of armed forces and groups. For example, those who have been hit hardest by the conflict may be more likely to have negative perceptions of returning combatants. Others may simply be happy to be reunited with family members. The DDR process may also be negatively perceived as rewarding combatants. When necessary, strategic communication can be used as a means to transform the perceptions of communities and to combat stigmatization, hate speech, marginalization and discrimination against former members of armed forces and groups. Women and girls are often stigmatized in receiving communities and PI\/SC can play a pivotal role in creating a more supportive environment for them. PI\/SC should also be utilized to promote non-violent behaviour, including engaging men and boys as allies in promoting positive masculine norms (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). Finally, PI\/SC should also be used to destigmatize the mental health impacts of conflict and raise awareness of psychosocial support services.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116785,7 +116785,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1974, - "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \\n At what stage is the DDR process? \\n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \\n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \\n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \\n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \\n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \\n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \\n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \\n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \\n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \\n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \\n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \\n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \\n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \\n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \\n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \\n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", + "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \n At what stage is the DDR process? \n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116796,14 +116796,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \\n At what stage is the DDR process?", + "Sentence": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \n At what stage is the DDR process?", "newParagraph": "designing pisc strategy ddr practitioner take following key factor account n stage ddr process n primary intermediary target audience target audience differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n may eligible participate ddr process eligibility differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n related pisc campaign underway aligneddeconflicted pisc strategy ddr process n role men woman boy girl group impacted conflict n existing gender stereotype identity pisc strategy support positive change n stigma woman girl associated armed force group stigma mental health issue posttraumatic stress n literacy level men woman intended receive information n behaviouralattitude change pisc strategy trying bring n change achieved taking account literacy rate presence different medium etc n various network involved dissemination information eg interconnection among social network excombatants household membership community tie military reporting line etc network member greatest influence n woman men obtain information different mean channel effectively reach woman n language information need delivered also taking account possible foreign combatant n organization involved pisc strategy n pisc strategy monitored n prevailing information situation information need n source disinformation misinformation n key local influencersamplifiers n dominant medium technology use locally population segmentsdemographics", "ProcessedSent": "designing pisc strategy ddr practitioner take following key factor account n stage ddr process", "SentID": 6488 }, { "ParagraphID": 1974, - "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \\n At what stage is the DDR process? \\n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \\n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \\n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \\n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \\n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \\n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \\n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \\n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \\n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \\n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \\n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \\n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \\n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \\n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \\n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \\n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", + "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \n At what stage is the DDR process? \n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116814,14 +116814,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences?", + "Sentence": "\n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences?", "newParagraph": "designing pisc strategy ddr practitioner take following key factor account n stage ddr process n primary intermediary target audience target audience differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n may eligible participate ddr process eligibility differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n related pisc campaign underway aligneddeconflicted pisc strategy ddr process n role men woman boy girl group impacted conflict n existing gender stereotype identity pisc strategy support positive change n stigma woman girl associated armed force group stigma mental health issue posttraumatic stress n literacy level men woman intended receive information n behaviouralattitude change pisc strategy trying bring n change achieved taking account literacy rate presence different medium etc n various network involved dissemination information eg interconnection among social network excombatants household membership community tie military reporting line etc network member greatest influence n woman men obtain information different mean channel effectively reach woman n language information need delivered also taking account possible foreign combatant n organization involved pisc strategy n pisc strategy monitored n prevailing information situation information need n source disinformation misinformation n key local influencersamplifiers n dominant medium technology use locally population segmentsdemographics", "ProcessedSent": "n primary intermediary target audience", "SentID": 6489 }, { "ParagraphID": 1974, - "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \\n At what stage is the DDR process? \\n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \\n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \\n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \\n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \\n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \\n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \\n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \\n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \\n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \\n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \\n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \\n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \\n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \\n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \\n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \\n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", + "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \n At what stage is the DDR process? \n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116839,7 +116839,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1974, - "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \\n At what stage is the DDR process? \\n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \\n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \\n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \\n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \\n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \\n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \\n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \\n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \\n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \\n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \\n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \\n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \\n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \\n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \\n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \\n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", + "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \n At what stage is the DDR process? \n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116850,14 +116850,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process?", + "Sentence": "\n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process?", "newParagraph": "designing pisc strategy ddr practitioner take following key factor account n stage ddr process n primary intermediary target audience target audience differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n may eligible participate ddr process eligibility differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n related pisc campaign underway aligneddeconflicted pisc strategy ddr process n role men woman boy girl group impacted conflict n existing gender stereotype identity pisc strategy support positive change n stigma woman girl associated armed force group stigma mental health issue posttraumatic stress n literacy level men woman intended receive information n behaviouralattitude change pisc strategy trying bring n change achieved taking account literacy rate presence different medium etc n various network involved dissemination information eg interconnection among social network excombatants household membership community tie military reporting line etc network member greatest influence n woman men obtain information different mean channel effectively reach woman n language information need delivered also taking account possible foreign combatant n organization involved pisc strategy n pisc strategy monitored n prevailing information situation information need n source disinformation misinformation n key local influencersamplifiers n dominant medium technology use locally population segmentsdemographics", "ProcessedSent": "n may eligible participate ddr process", "SentID": 6491 }, { "ParagraphID": 1974, - "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \\n At what stage is the DDR process? \\n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \\n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \\n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \\n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \\n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \\n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \\n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \\n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \\n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \\n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \\n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \\n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \\n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \\n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \\n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \\n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", + "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \n At what stage is the DDR process? \n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116875,7 +116875,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1974, - "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \\n At what stage is the DDR process? \\n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \\n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \\n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \\n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \\n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \\n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \\n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \\n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \\n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \\n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \\n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \\n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \\n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \\n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \\n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \\n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", + "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \n At what stage is the DDR process? \n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116886,14 +116886,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process?", + "Sentence": "\n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process?", "newParagraph": "designing pisc strategy ddr practitioner take following key factor account n stage ddr process n primary intermediary target audience target audience differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n may eligible participate ddr process eligibility differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n related pisc campaign underway aligneddeconflicted pisc strategy ddr process n role men woman boy girl group impacted conflict n existing gender stereotype identity pisc strategy support positive change n stigma woman girl associated armed force group stigma mental health issue posttraumatic stress n literacy level men woman intended receive information n behaviouralattitude change pisc strategy trying bring n change achieved taking account literacy rate presence different medium etc n various network involved dissemination information eg interconnection among social network excombatants household membership community tie military reporting line etc network member greatest influence n woman men obtain information different mean channel effectively reach woman n language information need delivered also taking account possible foreign combatant n organization involved pisc strategy n pisc strategy monitored n prevailing information situation information need n source disinformation misinformation n key local influencersamplifiers n dominant medium technology use locally population segmentsdemographics", "ProcessedSent": "n related pisc campaign underway aligneddeconflicted pisc strategy ddr process", "SentID": 6493 }, { "ParagraphID": 1974, - "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \\n At what stage is the DDR process? \\n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \\n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \\n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \\n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \\n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \\n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \\n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \\n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \\n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \\n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \\n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \\n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \\n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \\n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \\n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \\n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", + "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \n At what stage is the DDR process? \n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116904,14 +116904,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict?", + "Sentence": "\n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict?", "newParagraph": "designing pisc strategy ddr practitioner take following key factor account n stage ddr process n primary intermediary target audience target audience differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n may eligible participate ddr process eligibility differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n related pisc campaign underway aligneddeconflicted pisc strategy ddr process n role men woman boy girl group impacted conflict n existing gender stereotype identity pisc strategy support positive change n stigma woman girl associated armed force group stigma mental health issue posttraumatic stress n literacy level men woman intended receive information n behaviouralattitude change pisc strategy trying bring n change achieved taking account literacy rate presence different medium etc n various network involved dissemination information eg interconnection among social network excombatants household membership community tie military reporting line etc network member greatest influence n woman men obtain information different mean channel effectively reach woman n language information need delivered also taking account possible foreign combatant n organization involved pisc strategy n pisc strategy monitored n prevailing information situation information need n source disinformation misinformation n key local influencersamplifiers n dominant medium technology use locally population segmentsdemographics", "ProcessedSent": "n role men woman boy girl group impacted conflict", "SentID": 6494 }, { "ParagraphID": 1974, - "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \\n At what stage is the DDR process? \\n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \\n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \\n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \\n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \\n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \\n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \\n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \\n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \\n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \\n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \\n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \\n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \\n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \\n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \\n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \\n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", + "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \n At what stage is the DDR process? \n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116922,14 +116922,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change?", + "Sentence": "\n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change?", "newParagraph": "designing pisc strategy ddr practitioner take following key factor account n stage ddr process n primary intermediary target audience target audience differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n may eligible participate ddr process eligibility differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n related pisc campaign underway aligneddeconflicted pisc strategy ddr process n role men woman boy girl group impacted conflict n existing gender stereotype identity pisc strategy support positive change n stigma woman girl associated armed force group stigma mental health issue posttraumatic stress n literacy level men woman intended receive information n behaviouralattitude change pisc strategy trying bring n change achieved taking account literacy rate presence different medium etc n various network involved dissemination information eg interconnection among social network excombatants household membership community tie military reporting line etc network member greatest influence n woman men obtain information different mean channel effectively reach woman n language information need delivered also taking account possible foreign combatant n organization involved pisc strategy n pisc strategy monitored n prevailing information situation information need n source disinformation misinformation n key local influencersamplifiers n dominant medium technology use locally population segmentsdemographics", "ProcessedSent": "n existing gender stereotype identity pisc strategy support positive change", "SentID": 6495 }, { "ParagraphID": 1974, - "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \\n At what stage is the DDR process? \\n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \\n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \\n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \\n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \\n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \\n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \\n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \\n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \\n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \\n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \\n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \\n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \\n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \\n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \\n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \\n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", + "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \n At what stage is the DDR process? \n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116940,14 +116940,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups?", + "Sentence": "\n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups?", "newParagraph": "designing pisc strategy ddr practitioner take following key factor account n stage ddr process n primary intermediary target audience target audience differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n may eligible participate ddr process eligibility differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n related pisc campaign underway aligneddeconflicted pisc strategy ddr process n role men woman boy girl group impacted conflict n existing gender stereotype identity pisc strategy support positive change n stigma woman girl associated armed force group stigma mental health issue posttraumatic stress n literacy level men woman intended receive information n behaviouralattitude change pisc strategy trying bring n change achieved taking account literacy rate presence different medium etc n various network involved dissemination information eg interconnection among social network excombatants household membership community tie military reporting line etc network member greatest influence n woman men obtain information different mean channel effectively reach woman n language information need delivered also taking account possible foreign combatant n organization involved pisc strategy n pisc strategy monitored n prevailing information situation information need n source disinformation misinformation n key local influencersamplifiers n dominant medium technology use locally population segmentsdemographics", "ProcessedSent": "n stigma woman girl associated armed force group", "SentID": 6496 }, { "ParagraphID": 1974, - "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \\n At what stage is the DDR process? \\n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \\n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \\n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \\n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \\n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \\n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \\n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \\n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \\n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \\n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \\n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \\n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \\n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \\n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \\n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \\n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", + "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \n At what stage is the DDR process? \n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116965,7 +116965,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1974, - "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \\n At what stage is the DDR process? \\n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \\n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \\n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \\n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \\n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \\n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \\n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \\n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \\n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \\n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \\n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \\n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \\n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \\n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \\n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \\n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", + "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \n At what stage is the DDR process? \n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116976,14 +116976,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information?", + "Sentence": "\n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information?", "newParagraph": "designing pisc strategy ddr practitioner take following key factor account n stage ddr process n primary intermediary target audience target audience differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n may eligible participate ddr process eligibility differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n related pisc campaign underway aligneddeconflicted pisc strategy ddr process n role men woman boy girl group impacted conflict n existing gender stereotype identity pisc strategy support positive change n stigma woman girl associated armed force group stigma mental health issue posttraumatic stress n literacy level men woman intended receive information n behaviouralattitude change pisc strategy trying bring n change achieved taking account literacy rate presence different medium etc n various network involved dissemination information eg interconnection among social network excombatants household membership community tie military reporting line etc network member greatest influence n woman men obtain information different mean channel effectively reach woman n language information need delivered also taking account possible foreign combatant n organization involved pisc strategy n pisc strategy monitored n prevailing information situation information need n source disinformation misinformation n key local influencersamplifiers n dominant medium technology use locally population segmentsdemographics", "ProcessedSent": "n literacy level men woman intended receive information", "SentID": 6498 }, { "ParagraphID": 1974, - "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \\n At what stage is the DDR process? \\n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \\n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \\n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \\n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \\n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \\n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \\n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \\n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \\n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \\n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \\n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \\n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \\n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \\n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \\n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \\n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", + "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \n At what stage is the DDR process? \n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -116994,14 +116994,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about?", + "Sentence": "\n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about?", "newParagraph": "designing pisc strategy ddr practitioner take following key factor account n stage ddr process n primary intermediary target audience target audience differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n may eligible participate ddr process eligibility differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n related pisc campaign underway aligneddeconflicted pisc strategy ddr process n role men woman boy girl group impacted conflict n existing gender stereotype identity pisc strategy support positive change n stigma woman girl associated armed force group stigma mental health issue posttraumatic stress n literacy level men woman intended receive information n behaviouralattitude change pisc strategy trying bring n change achieved taking account literacy rate presence different medium etc n various network involved dissemination information eg interconnection among social network excombatants household membership community tie military reporting line etc network member greatest influence n woman men obtain information different mean channel effectively reach woman n language information need delivered also taking account possible foreign combatant n organization involved pisc strategy n pisc strategy monitored n prevailing information situation information need n source disinformation misinformation n key local influencersamplifiers n dominant medium technology use locally population segmentsdemographics", "ProcessedSent": "n behaviouralattitude change pisc strategy trying bring", "SentID": 6499 }, { "ParagraphID": 1974, - "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \\n At what stage is the DDR process? \\n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \\n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \\n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \\n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \\n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \\n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \\n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \\n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \\n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \\n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \\n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \\n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \\n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \\n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \\n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \\n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", + "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \n At what stage is the DDR process? \n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -117012,14 +117012,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)?", + "Sentence": "\n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)?", "newParagraph": "designing pisc strategy ddr practitioner take following key factor account n stage ddr process n primary intermediary target audience target audience differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n may eligible participate ddr process eligibility differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n related pisc campaign underway aligneddeconflicted pisc strategy ddr process n role men woman boy girl group impacted conflict n existing gender stereotype identity pisc strategy support positive change n stigma woman girl associated armed force group stigma mental health issue posttraumatic stress n literacy level men woman intended receive information n behaviouralattitude change pisc strategy trying bring n change achieved taking account literacy rate presence different medium etc n various network involved dissemination information eg interconnection among social network excombatants household membership community tie military reporting line etc network member greatest influence n woman men obtain information different mean channel effectively reach woman n language information need delivered also taking account possible foreign combatant n organization involved pisc strategy n pisc strategy monitored n prevailing information situation information need n source disinformation misinformation n key local influencersamplifiers n dominant medium technology use locally population segmentsdemographics", "ProcessedSent": "n change achieved taking account literacy rate presence different medium etc", "SentID": 6500 }, { "ParagraphID": 1974, - "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \\n At what stage is the DDR process? \\n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \\n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \\n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \\n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \\n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \\n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \\n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \\n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \\n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \\n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \\n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \\n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \\n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \\n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \\n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \\n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", + "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \n At what stage is the DDR process? \n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -117030,14 +117030,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)?", + "Sentence": "\n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)?", "newParagraph": "designing pisc strategy ddr practitioner take following key factor account n stage ddr process n primary intermediary target audience target audience differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n may eligible participate ddr process eligibility differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n related pisc campaign underway aligneddeconflicted pisc strategy ddr process n role men woman boy girl group impacted conflict n existing gender stereotype identity pisc strategy support positive change n stigma woman girl associated armed force group stigma mental health issue posttraumatic stress n literacy level men woman intended receive information n behaviouralattitude change pisc strategy trying bring n change achieved taking account literacy rate presence different medium etc n various network involved dissemination information eg interconnection among social network excombatants household membership community tie military reporting line etc network member greatest influence n woman men obtain information different mean channel effectively reach woman n language information need delivered also taking account possible foreign combatant n organization involved pisc strategy n pisc strategy monitored n prevailing information situation information need n source disinformation misinformation n key local influencersamplifiers n dominant medium technology use locally population segmentsdemographics", "ProcessedSent": "n various network involved dissemination information eg interconnection among social network excombatants household membership community tie military reporting line etc", "SentID": 6501 }, { "ParagraphID": 1974, - "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \\n At what stage is the DDR process? \\n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \\n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \\n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \\n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \\n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \\n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \\n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \\n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \\n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \\n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \\n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \\n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \\n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \\n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \\n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \\n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", + "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \n At what stage is the DDR process? \n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -117055,7 +117055,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1974, - "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \\n At what stage is the DDR process? \\n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \\n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \\n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \\n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \\n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \\n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \\n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \\n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \\n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \\n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \\n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \\n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \\n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \\n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \\n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \\n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", + "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \n At what stage is the DDR process? \n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -117066,14 +117066,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Do women and men obtain information by different means?", + "Sentence": "\n Do women and men obtain information by different means?", "newParagraph": "designing pisc strategy ddr practitioner take following key factor account n stage ddr process n primary intermediary target audience target audience differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n may eligible participate ddr process eligibility differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n related pisc campaign underway aligneddeconflicted pisc strategy ddr process n role men woman boy girl group impacted conflict n existing gender stereotype identity pisc strategy support positive change n stigma woman girl associated armed force group stigma mental health issue posttraumatic stress n literacy level men woman intended receive information n behaviouralattitude change pisc strategy trying bring n change achieved taking account literacy rate presence different medium etc n various network involved dissemination information eg interconnection among social network excombatants household membership community tie military reporting line etc network member greatest influence n woman men obtain information different mean channel effectively reach woman n language information need delivered also taking account possible foreign combatant n organization involved pisc strategy n pisc strategy monitored n prevailing information situation information need n source disinformation misinformation n key local influencersamplifiers n dominant medium technology use locally population segmentsdemographics", "ProcessedSent": "n woman men obtain information different mean", "SentID": 6503 }, { "ParagraphID": 1974, - "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \\n At what stage is the DDR process? \\n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \\n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \\n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \\n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \\n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \\n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \\n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \\n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \\n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \\n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \\n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \\n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \\n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \\n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \\n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \\n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", + "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \n At what stage is the DDR process? \n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -117091,7 +117091,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1974, - "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \\n At what stage is the DDR process? \\n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \\n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \\n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \\n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \\n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \\n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \\n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \\n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \\n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \\n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \\n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \\n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \\n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \\n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \\n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \\n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", + "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \n At what stage is the DDR process? \n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -117102,14 +117102,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)?", + "Sentence": "\n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)?", "newParagraph": "designing pisc strategy ddr practitioner take following key factor account n stage ddr process n primary intermediary target audience target audience differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n may eligible participate ddr process eligibility differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n related pisc campaign underway aligneddeconflicted pisc strategy ddr process n role men woman boy girl group impacted conflict n existing gender stereotype identity pisc strategy support positive change n stigma woman girl associated armed force group stigma mental health issue posttraumatic stress n literacy level men woman intended receive information n behaviouralattitude change pisc strategy trying bring n change achieved taking account literacy rate presence different medium etc n various network involved dissemination information eg interconnection among social network excombatants household membership community tie military reporting line etc network member greatest influence n woman men obtain information different mean channel effectively reach woman n language information need delivered also taking account possible foreign combatant n organization involved pisc strategy n pisc strategy monitored n prevailing information situation information need n source disinformation misinformation n key local influencersamplifiers n dominant medium technology use locally population segmentsdemographics", "ProcessedSent": "n language information need delivered also taking account possible foreign combatant", "SentID": 6505 }, { "ParagraphID": 1974, - "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \\n At what stage is the DDR process? \\n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \\n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \\n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \\n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \\n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \\n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \\n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \\n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \\n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \\n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \\n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \\n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \\n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \\n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \\n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \\n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", + "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \n At what stage is the DDR process? \n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -117120,14 +117120,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies?", + "Sentence": "\n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies?", "newParagraph": "designing pisc strategy ddr practitioner take following key factor account n stage ddr process n primary intermediary target audience target audience differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n may eligible participate ddr process eligibility differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n related pisc campaign underway aligneddeconflicted pisc strategy ddr process n role men woman boy girl group impacted conflict n existing gender stereotype identity pisc strategy support positive change n stigma woman girl associated armed force group stigma mental health issue posttraumatic stress n literacy level men woman intended receive information n behaviouralattitude change pisc strategy trying bring n change achieved taking account literacy rate presence different medium etc n various network involved dissemination information eg interconnection among social network excombatants household membership community tie military reporting line etc network member greatest influence n woman men obtain information different mean channel effectively reach woman n language information need delivered also taking account possible foreign combatant n organization involved pisc strategy n pisc strategy monitored n prevailing information situation information need n source disinformation misinformation n key local influencersamplifiers n dominant medium technology use locally population segmentsdemographics", "ProcessedSent": "n organization involved pisc strategy", "SentID": 6506 }, { "ParagraphID": 1974, - "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \\n At what stage is the DDR process? \\n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \\n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \\n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \\n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \\n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \\n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \\n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \\n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \\n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \\n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \\n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \\n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \\n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \\n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \\n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \\n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", + "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \n At what stage is the DDR process? \n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -117138,14 +117138,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored?", + "Sentence": "\n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored?", "newParagraph": "designing pisc strategy ddr practitioner take following key factor account n stage ddr process n primary intermediary target audience target audience differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n may eligible participate ddr process eligibility differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n related pisc campaign underway aligneddeconflicted pisc strategy ddr process n role men woman boy girl group impacted conflict n existing gender stereotype identity pisc strategy support positive change n stigma woman girl associated armed force group stigma mental health issue posttraumatic stress n literacy level men woman intended receive information n behaviouralattitude change pisc strategy trying bring n change achieved taking account literacy rate presence different medium etc n various network involved dissemination information eg interconnection among social network excombatants household membership community tie military reporting line etc network member greatest influence n woman men obtain information different mean channel effectively reach woman n language information need delivered also taking account possible foreign combatant n organization involved pisc strategy n pisc strategy monitored n prevailing information situation information need n source disinformation misinformation n key local influencersamplifiers n dominant medium technology use locally population segmentsdemographics", "ProcessedSent": "n pisc strategy monitored", "SentID": 6507 }, { "ParagraphID": 1974, - "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \\n At what stage is the DDR process? \\n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \\n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \\n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \\n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \\n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \\n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \\n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \\n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \\n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \\n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \\n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \\n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \\n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \\n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \\n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \\n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", + "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \n At what stage is the DDR process? \n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -117156,14 +117156,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What is the prevailing information situation?", + "Sentence": "\n What is the prevailing information situation?", "newParagraph": "designing pisc strategy ddr practitioner take following key factor account n stage ddr process n primary intermediary target audience target audience differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n may eligible participate ddr process eligibility differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n related pisc campaign underway aligneddeconflicted pisc strategy ddr process n role men woman boy girl group impacted conflict n existing gender stereotype identity pisc strategy support positive change n stigma woman girl associated armed force group stigma mental health issue posttraumatic stress n literacy level men woman intended receive information n behaviouralattitude change pisc strategy trying bring n change achieved taking account literacy rate presence different medium etc n various network involved dissemination information eg interconnection among social network excombatants household membership community tie military reporting line etc network member greatest influence n woman men obtain information different mean channel effectively reach woman n language information need delivered also taking account possible foreign combatant n organization involved pisc strategy n pisc strategy monitored n prevailing information situation information need n source disinformation misinformation n key local influencersamplifiers n dominant medium technology use locally population segmentsdemographics", "ProcessedSent": "n prevailing information situation", "SentID": 6508 }, { "ParagraphID": 1974, - "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \\n At what stage is the DDR process? \\n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \\n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \\n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \\n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \\n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \\n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \\n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \\n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \\n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \\n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \\n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \\n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \\n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \\n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \\n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \\n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", + "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \n At what stage is the DDR process? \n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -117181,7 +117181,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1974, - "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \\n At what stage is the DDR process? \\n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \\n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \\n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \\n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \\n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \\n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \\n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \\n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \\n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \\n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \\n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \\n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \\n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \\n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \\n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \\n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", + "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \n At what stage is the DDR process? \n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -117192,14 +117192,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation?", + "Sentence": "\n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation?", "newParagraph": "designing pisc strategy ddr practitioner take following key factor account n stage ddr process n primary intermediary target audience target audience differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n may eligible participate ddr process eligibility differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n related pisc campaign underway aligneddeconflicted pisc strategy ddr process n role men woman boy girl group impacted conflict n existing gender stereotype identity pisc strategy support positive change n stigma woman girl associated armed force group stigma mental health issue posttraumatic stress n literacy level men woman intended receive information n behaviouralattitude change pisc strategy trying bring n change achieved taking account literacy rate presence different medium etc n various network involved dissemination information eg interconnection among social network excombatants household membership community tie military reporting line etc network member greatest influence n woman men obtain information different mean channel effectively reach woman n language information need delivered also taking account possible foreign combatant n organization involved pisc strategy n pisc strategy monitored n prevailing information situation information need n source disinformation misinformation n key local influencersamplifiers n dominant medium technology use locally population segmentsdemographics", "ProcessedSent": "n source disinformation misinformation", "SentID": 6510 }, { "ParagraphID": 1974, - "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \\n At what stage is the DDR process? \\n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \\n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \\n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \\n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \\n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \\n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \\n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \\n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \\n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \\n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \\n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \\n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \\n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \\n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \\n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \\n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", + "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \n At what stage is the DDR process? \n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -117210,14 +117210,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers?", + "Sentence": "\n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers?", "newParagraph": "designing pisc strategy ddr practitioner take following key factor account n stage ddr process n primary intermediary target audience target audience differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n may eligible participate ddr process eligibility differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n related pisc campaign underway aligneddeconflicted pisc strategy ddr process n role men woman boy girl group impacted conflict n existing gender stereotype identity pisc strategy support positive change n stigma woman girl associated armed force group stigma mental health issue posttraumatic stress n literacy level men woman intended receive information n behaviouralattitude change pisc strategy trying bring n change achieved taking account literacy rate presence different medium etc n various network involved dissemination information eg interconnection among social network excombatants household membership community tie military reporting line etc network member greatest influence n woman men obtain information different mean channel effectively reach woman n language information need delivered also taking account possible foreign combatant n organization involved pisc strategy n pisc strategy monitored n prevailing information situation information need n source disinformation misinformation n key local influencersamplifiers n dominant medium technology use locally population segmentsdemographics", "ProcessedSent": "n key local influencersamplifiers", "SentID": 6511 }, { "ParagraphID": 1974, - "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \\n At what stage is the DDR process? \\n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \\n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \\n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \\n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \\n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \\n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \\n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \\n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \\n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \\n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \\n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \\n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \\n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \\n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \\n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \\n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \\n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", + "Paragraph": "When designing a PI\/SC strategy, DDR practitioners should take the following key factors into account: \n At what stage is the DDR process? \n Who are the primary and intermediary target audiences? Do these target audiences differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Who may not be eligible to participate in the DDR process? Does eligibility differ for different components of the DDR process (DDR programmes, DDR-related tools, reintegration support)? \n Are other, related PI\/SC campaigns underway, and should these be aligned\/deconflicted with the PI\/SC strategy for the DDR process? \n What are the roles of men, women, boys and girls, and how have each of these groups been impacted by the conflict? \n What are the existing gender stereotypes and identities, and how can PI\/SC strategies support positive change? \n Is there stigma against women and girls associated with armed forces and groups? Is there stigma against mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress? \n What are the literacy levels of the men and women intended to receive the information? \n What behavioural\/attitude change is the PI\/SC strategy trying to bring about? \n How can this change be achieved (taking into account literacy rates, the presence of different media, etc.)? \n What are the various networks involved in the dissemination of information (e.g., interconnections among social networks of ex-combatants, household membership, community ties, military reporting lines, etc.)? Which network members have the greatest influence? \n Do women and men obtain information by different means? (If so, which channels most effectively reach women?) \n In what language does the information need to be delivered (also taking into account possible foreign combatants)? \n What other organizations are involved, and what are their PI\/SC strategies? \n How can the PI\/SC strategy be monitored? \n What is the prevailing information situation? (What are the information needs?) \n What are the sources of disinformation and misinformation? \n Who are the key local influencers\/amplifiers? \n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -117228,14 +117228,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", + "Sentence": "\n What dominant media technologies are in use locally and by which population segments\/demographics?", "newParagraph": "designing pisc strategy ddr practitioner take following key factor account n stage ddr process n primary intermediary target audience target audience differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n may eligible participate ddr process eligibility differ different component ddr process ddr programme ddrrelated tool reintegration support n related pisc campaign underway aligneddeconflicted pisc strategy ddr process n role men woman boy girl group impacted conflict n existing gender stereotype identity pisc strategy support positive change n stigma woman girl associated armed force group stigma mental health issue posttraumatic stress n literacy level men woman intended receive information n behaviouralattitude change pisc strategy trying bring n change achieved taking account literacy rate presence different medium etc n various network involved dissemination information eg interconnection among social network excombatants household membership community tie military reporting line etc network member greatest influence n woman men obtain information different mean channel effectively reach woman n language information need delivered also taking account possible foreign combatant n organization involved pisc strategy n pisc strategy monitored n prevailing information situation information need n source disinformation misinformation n key local influencersamplifiers n dominant medium technology use locally population segmentsdemographics", "ProcessedSent": "n dominant medium technology use locally population segmentsdemographics", "SentID": 6512 }, { "ParagraphID": 1975, - "Paragraph": "To ensure that the DDR PI\/SC strategy fits local needs, DDR practitioners should understand the social, political and cultural context and identify factors that shape attitudes. It will then be possible to define behavioural objectives and design messages to bring about the required social change. Target audience and issue analysis must be adopted to provide a tailored approach to engage with different audiences based on their concerns, issues and attitudes. During the planning stage, the aim should be to collect the following minimum information to aid practitioners in understanding the local context: \\n Conflict analysis, including an understanding of local ethnic, racial and religious divisions at the national and local levels; \\n Gender analysis, including the role of women, men, girls and boys in society, as well as the gendered power structures in society and in armed forces and groups; \\n Media mapping, including the geographic reach, political slant and cost of different media; \\n Social mapping to identify key influencers and communicators in the society and their constituencies (e.g., academics and intelligentsia, politicians, youth leaders, women leaders, religious leaders, village leaders, commanders, celebrities, etc.); \\n Traditional methods of communication; \\n Cultural perceptions of the disabled, the chronically ill, rape survivors, extra-marital childbirth, mental health issues including post-traumatic stress, etc.; \\n Literacy rates; \\n Prevalence of intimate partner violence and sexual and gender-based violence; and \\n Cultural moments and\/or religious holidays that may be used to amplify messages of peace and the benefits of DDR.", + "Paragraph": "To ensure that the DDR PI\/SC strategy fits local needs, DDR practitioners should understand the social, political and cultural context and identify factors that shape attitudes. It will then be possible to define behavioural objectives and design messages to bring about the required social change. Target audience and issue analysis must be adopted to provide a tailored approach to engage with different audiences based on their concerns, issues and attitudes. During the planning stage, the aim should be to collect the following minimum information to aid practitioners in understanding the local context: \n Conflict analysis, including an understanding of local ethnic, racial and religious divisions at the national and local levels; \n Gender analysis, including the role of women, men, girls and boys in society, as well as the gendered power structures in society and in armed forces and groups; \n Media mapping, including the geographic reach, political slant and cost of different media; \n Social mapping to identify key influencers and communicators in the society and their constituencies (e.g., academics and intelligentsia, politicians, youth leaders, women leaders, religious leaders, village leaders, commanders, celebrities, etc.); \n Traditional methods of communication; \n Cultural perceptions of the disabled, the chronically ill, rape survivors, extra-marital childbirth, mental health issues including post-traumatic stress, etc.; \n Literacy rates; \n Prevalence of intimate partner violence and sexual and gender-based violence; and \n Cultural moments and\/or religious holidays that may be used to amplify messages of peace and the benefits of DDR.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -117253,7 +117253,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1975, - "Paragraph": "To ensure that the DDR PI\/SC strategy fits local needs, DDR practitioners should understand the social, political and cultural context and identify factors that shape attitudes. It will then be possible to define behavioural objectives and design messages to bring about the required social change. Target audience and issue analysis must be adopted to provide a tailored approach to engage with different audiences based on their concerns, issues and attitudes. During the planning stage, the aim should be to collect the following minimum information to aid practitioners in understanding the local context: \\n Conflict analysis, including an understanding of local ethnic, racial and religious divisions at the national and local levels; \\n Gender analysis, including the role of women, men, girls and boys in society, as well as the gendered power structures in society and in armed forces and groups; \\n Media mapping, including the geographic reach, political slant and cost of different media; \\n Social mapping to identify key influencers and communicators in the society and their constituencies (e.g., academics and intelligentsia, politicians, youth leaders, women leaders, religious leaders, village leaders, commanders, celebrities, etc.); \\n Traditional methods of communication; \\n Cultural perceptions of the disabled, the chronically ill, rape survivors, extra-marital childbirth, mental health issues including post-traumatic stress, etc.; \\n Literacy rates; \\n Prevalence of intimate partner violence and sexual and gender-based violence; and \\n Cultural moments and\/or religious holidays that may be used to amplify messages of peace and the benefits of DDR.", + "Paragraph": "To ensure that the DDR PI\/SC strategy fits local needs, DDR practitioners should understand the social, political and cultural context and identify factors that shape attitudes. It will then be possible to define behavioural objectives and design messages to bring about the required social change. Target audience and issue analysis must be adopted to provide a tailored approach to engage with different audiences based on their concerns, issues and attitudes. During the planning stage, the aim should be to collect the following minimum information to aid practitioners in understanding the local context: \n Conflict analysis, including an understanding of local ethnic, racial and religious divisions at the national and local levels; \n Gender analysis, including the role of women, men, girls and boys in society, as well as the gendered power structures in society and in armed forces and groups; \n Media mapping, including the geographic reach, political slant and cost of different media; \n Social mapping to identify key influencers and communicators in the society and their constituencies (e.g., academics and intelligentsia, politicians, youth leaders, women leaders, religious leaders, village leaders, commanders, celebrities, etc.); \n Traditional methods of communication; \n Cultural perceptions of the disabled, the chronically ill, rape survivors, extra-marital childbirth, mental health issues including post-traumatic stress, etc.; \n Literacy rates; \n Prevalence of intimate partner violence and sexual and gender-based violence; and \n Cultural moments and\/or religious holidays that may be used to amplify messages of peace and the benefits of DDR.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -117271,7 +117271,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1975, - "Paragraph": "To ensure that the DDR PI\/SC strategy fits local needs, DDR practitioners should understand the social, political and cultural context and identify factors that shape attitudes. It will then be possible to define behavioural objectives and design messages to bring about the required social change. Target audience and issue analysis must be adopted to provide a tailored approach to engage with different audiences based on their concerns, issues and attitudes. During the planning stage, the aim should be to collect the following minimum information to aid practitioners in understanding the local context: \\n Conflict analysis, including an understanding of local ethnic, racial and religious divisions at the national and local levels; \\n Gender analysis, including the role of women, men, girls and boys in society, as well as the gendered power structures in society and in armed forces and groups; \\n Media mapping, including the geographic reach, political slant and cost of different media; \\n Social mapping to identify key influencers and communicators in the society and their constituencies (e.g., academics and intelligentsia, politicians, youth leaders, women leaders, religious leaders, village leaders, commanders, celebrities, etc.); \\n Traditional methods of communication; \\n Cultural perceptions of the disabled, the chronically ill, rape survivors, extra-marital childbirth, mental health issues including post-traumatic stress, etc.; \\n Literacy rates; \\n Prevalence of intimate partner violence and sexual and gender-based violence; and \\n Cultural moments and\/or religious holidays that may be used to amplify messages of peace and the benefits of DDR.", + "Paragraph": "To ensure that the DDR PI\/SC strategy fits local needs, DDR practitioners should understand the social, political and cultural context and identify factors that shape attitudes. It will then be possible to define behavioural objectives and design messages to bring about the required social change. Target audience and issue analysis must be adopted to provide a tailored approach to engage with different audiences based on their concerns, issues and attitudes. During the planning stage, the aim should be to collect the following minimum information to aid practitioners in understanding the local context: \n Conflict analysis, including an understanding of local ethnic, racial and religious divisions at the national and local levels; \n Gender analysis, including the role of women, men, girls and boys in society, as well as the gendered power structures in society and in armed forces and groups; \n Media mapping, including the geographic reach, political slant and cost of different media; \n Social mapping to identify key influencers and communicators in the society and their constituencies (e.g., academics and intelligentsia, politicians, youth leaders, women leaders, religious leaders, village leaders, commanders, celebrities, etc.); \n Traditional methods of communication; \n Cultural perceptions of the disabled, the chronically ill, rape survivors, extra-marital childbirth, mental health issues including post-traumatic stress, etc.; \n Literacy rates; \n Prevalence of intimate partner violence and sexual and gender-based violence; and \n Cultural moments and\/or religious holidays that may be used to amplify messages of peace and the benefits of DDR.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -117289,7 +117289,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1975, - "Paragraph": "To ensure that the DDR PI\/SC strategy fits local needs, DDR practitioners should understand the social, political and cultural context and identify factors that shape attitudes. It will then be possible to define behavioural objectives and design messages to bring about the required social change. Target audience and issue analysis must be adopted to provide a tailored approach to engage with different audiences based on their concerns, issues and attitudes. During the planning stage, the aim should be to collect the following minimum information to aid practitioners in understanding the local context: \\n Conflict analysis, including an understanding of local ethnic, racial and religious divisions at the national and local levels; \\n Gender analysis, including the role of women, men, girls and boys in society, as well as the gendered power structures in society and in armed forces and groups; \\n Media mapping, including the geographic reach, political slant and cost of different media; \\n Social mapping to identify key influencers and communicators in the society and their constituencies (e.g., academics and intelligentsia, politicians, youth leaders, women leaders, religious leaders, village leaders, commanders, celebrities, etc.); \\n Traditional methods of communication; \\n Cultural perceptions of the disabled, the chronically ill, rape survivors, extra-marital childbirth, mental health issues including post-traumatic stress, etc.; \\n Literacy rates; \\n Prevalence of intimate partner violence and sexual and gender-based violence; and \\n Cultural moments and\/or religious holidays that may be used to amplify messages of peace and the benefits of DDR.", + "Paragraph": "To ensure that the DDR PI\/SC strategy fits local needs, DDR practitioners should understand the social, political and cultural context and identify factors that shape attitudes. It will then be possible to define behavioural objectives and design messages to bring about the required social change. Target audience and issue analysis must be adopted to provide a tailored approach to engage with different audiences based on their concerns, issues and attitudes. During the planning stage, the aim should be to collect the following minimum information to aid practitioners in understanding the local context: \n Conflict analysis, including an understanding of local ethnic, racial and religious divisions at the national and local levels; \n Gender analysis, including the role of women, men, girls and boys in society, as well as the gendered power structures in society and in armed forces and groups; \n Media mapping, including the geographic reach, political slant and cost of different media; \n Social mapping to identify key influencers and communicators in the society and their constituencies (e.g., academics and intelligentsia, politicians, youth leaders, women leaders, religious leaders, village leaders, commanders, celebrities, etc.); \n Traditional methods of communication; \n Cultural perceptions of the disabled, the chronically ill, rape survivors, extra-marital childbirth, mental health issues including post-traumatic stress, etc.; \n Literacy rates; \n Prevalence of intimate partner violence and sexual and gender-based violence; and \n Cultural moments and\/or religious holidays that may be used to amplify messages of peace and the benefits of DDR.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -117300,14 +117300,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Understanding the local context", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "During the planning stage, the aim should be to collect the following minimum information to aid practitioners in understanding the local context: \\n Conflict analysis, including an understanding of local ethnic, racial and religious divisions at the national and local levels; \\n Gender analysis, including the role of women, men, girls and boys in society, as well as the gendered power structures in society and in armed forces and groups; \\n Media mapping, including the geographic reach, political slant and cost of different media; \\n Social mapping to identify key influencers and communicators in the society and their constituencies (e.g., academics and intelligentsia, politicians, youth leaders, women leaders, religious leaders, village leaders, commanders, celebrities, etc.", + "Sentence": "During the planning stage, the aim should be to collect the following minimum information to aid practitioners in understanding the local context: \n Conflict analysis, including an understanding of local ethnic, racial and religious divisions at the national and local levels; \n Gender analysis, including the role of women, men, girls and boys in society, as well as the gendered power structures in society and in armed forces and groups; \n Media mapping, including the geographic reach, political slant and cost of different media; \n Social mapping to identify key influencers and communicators in the society and their constituencies (e.g., academics and intelligentsia, politicians, youth leaders, women leaders, religious leaders, village leaders, commanders, celebrities, etc.", "newParagraph": "ensure ddr pisc strategy fit local need ddr practitioner understand social political cultural context identify factor shape attitude possible define behavioural objective design message bring required social change target audience issue analysis must adopted provide tailored approach engage different audience based concern issue attitude planning stage aim collect following minimum information aid practitioner understanding local context n conflict analysis including understanding local ethnic racial religious division national local level n gender analysis including role woman men girl boy society well gendered power structure society armed force group n medium mapping including geographic reach political slant cost different medium n social mapping identify key influencers communicator society constituency eg academic intelligentsia politician youth leader woman leader religious leader village leader commander celebrity etc n traditional method communication n cultural perception disabled chronically ill rape survivor extramarital childbirth mental health issue including posttraumatic stress etc n literacy rate n prevalence intimate partner violence sexual genderbased violence n cultural moment andor religious holiday may used amplify message peace benefit ddr", "ProcessedSent": "planning stage aim collect following minimum information aid practitioner understanding local context n conflict analysis including understanding local ethnic racial religious division national local level n gender analysis including role woman men girl boy society well gendered power structure society armed force group n medium mapping including geographic reach political slant cost different medium n social mapping identify key influencers communicator society constituency eg academic intelligentsia politician youth leader woman leader religious leader village leader commander celebrity etc", "SentID": 6516 }, { "ParagraphID": 1975, - "Paragraph": "To ensure that the DDR PI\/SC strategy fits local needs, DDR practitioners should understand the social, political and cultural context and identify factors that shape attitudes. It will then be possible to define behavioural objectives and design messages to bring about the required social change. Target audience and issue analysis must be adopted to provide a tailored approach to engage with different audiences based on their concerns, issues and attitudes. During the planning stage, the aim should be to collect the following minimum information to aid practitioners in understanding the local context: \\n Conflict analysis, including an understanding of local ethnic, racial and religious divisions at the national and local levels; \\n Gender analysis, including the role of women, men, girls and boys in society, as well as the gendered power structures in society and in armed forces and groups; \\n Media mapping, including the geographic reach, political slant and cost of different media; \\n Social mapping to identify key influencers and communicators in the society and their constituencies (e.g., academics and intelligentsia, politicians, youth leaders, women leaders, religious leaders, village leaders, commanders, celebrities, etc.); \\n Traditional methods of communication; \\n Cultural perceptions of the disabled, the chronically ill, rape survivors, extra-marital childbirth, mental health issues including post-traumatic stress, etc.; \\n Literacy rates; \\n Prevalence of intimate partner violence and sexual and gender-based violence; and \\n Cultural moments and\/or religious holidays that may be used to amplify messages of peace and the benefits of DDR.", + "Paragraph": "To ensure that the DDR PI\/SC strategy fits local needs, DDR practitioners should understand the social, political and cultural context and identify factors that shape attitudes. It will then be possible to define behavioural objectives and design messages to bring about the required social change. Target audience and issue analysis must be adopted to provide a tailored approach to engage with different audiences based on their concerns, issues and attitudes. During the planning stage, the aim should be to collect the following minimum information to aid practitioners in understanding the local context: \n Conflict analysis, including an understanding of local ethnic, racial and religious divisions at the national and local levels; \n Gender analysis, including the role of women, men, girls and boys in society, as well as the gendered power structures in society and in armed forces and groups; \n Media mapping, including the geographic reach, political slant and cost of different media; \n Social mapping to identify key influencers and communicators in the society and their constituencies (e.g., academics and intelligentsia, politicians, youth leaders, women leaders, religious leaders, village leaders, commanders, celebrities, etc.); \n Traditional methods of communication; \n Cultural perceptions of the disabled, the chronically ill, rape survivors, extra-marital childbirth, mental health issues including post-traumatic stress, etc.; \n Literacy rates; \n Prevalence of intimate partner violence and sexual and gender-based violence; and \n Cultural moments and\/or religious holidays that may be used to amplify messages of peace and the benefits of DDR.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -117318,14 +117318,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Understanding the local context", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "); \\n Traditional methods of communication; \\n Cultural perceptions of the disabled, the chronically ill, rape survivors, extra-marital childbirth, mental health issues including post-traumatic stress, etc.", + "Sentence": "); \n Traditional methods of communication; \n Cultural perceptions of the disabled, the chronically ill, rape survivors, extra-marital childbirth, mental health issues including post-traumatic stress, etc.", "newParagraph": "ensure ddr pisc strategy fit local need ddr practitioner understand social political cultural context identify factor shape attitude possible define behavioural objective design message bring required social change target audience issue analysis must adopted provide tailored approach engage different audience based concern issue attitude planning stage aim collect following minimum information aid practitioner understanding local context n conflict analysis including understanding local ethnic racial religious division national local level n gender analysis including role woman men girl boy society well gendered power structure society armed force group n medium mapping including geographic reach political slant cost different medium n social mapping identify key influencers communicator society constituency eg academic intelligentsia politician youth leader woman leader religious leader village leader commander celebrity etc n traditional method communication n cultural perception disabled chronically ill rape survivor extramarital childbirth mental health issue including posttraumatic stress etc n literacy rate n prevalence intimate partner violence sexual genderbased violence n cultural moment andor religious holiday may used amplify message peace benefit ddr", "ProcessedSent": " n traditional method communication n cultural perception disabled chronically ill rape survivor extramarital childbirth mental health issue including posttraumatic stress etc", "SentID": 6517 }, { "ParagraphID": 1975, - "Paragraph": "To ensure that the DDR PI\/SC strategy fits local needs, DDR practitioners should understand the social, political and cultural context and identify factors that shape attitudes. It will then be possible to define behavioural objectives and design messages to bring about the required social change. Target audience and issue analysis must be adopted to provide a tailored approach to engage with different audiences based on their concerns, issues and attitudes. During the planning stage, the aim should be to collect the following minimum information to aid practitioners in understanding the local context: \\n Conflict analysis, including an understanding of local ethnic, racial and religious divisions at the national and local levels; \\n Gender analysis, including the role of women, men, girls and boys in society, as well as the gendered power structures in society and in armed forces and groups; \\n Media mapping, including the geographic reach, political slant and cost of different media; \\n Social mapping to identify key influencers and communicators in the society and their constituencies (e.g., academics and intelligentsia, politicians, youth leaders, women leaders, religious leaders, village leaders, commanders, celebrities, etc.); \\n Traditional methods of communication; \\n Cultural perceptions of the disabled, the chronically ill, rape survivors, extra-marital childbirth, mental health issues including post-traumatic stress, etc.; \\n Literacy rates; \\n Prevalence of intimate partner violence and sexual and gender-based violence; and \\n Cultural moments and\/or religious holidays that may be used to amplify messages of peace and the benefits of DDR.", + "Paragraph": "To ensure that the DDR PI\/SC strategy fits local needs, DDR practitioners should understand the social, political and cultural context and identify factors that shape attitudes. It will then be possible to define behavioural objectives and design messages to bring about the required social change. Target audience and issue analysis must be adopted to provide a tailored approach to engage with different audiences based on their concerns, issues and attitudes. During the planning stage, the aim should be to collect the following minimum information to aid practitioners in understanding the local context: \n Conflict analysis, including an understanding of local ethnic, racial and religious divisions at the national and local levels; \n Gender analysis, including the role of women, men, girls and boys in society, as well as the gendered power structures in society and in armed forces and groups; \n Media mapping, including the geographic reach, political slant and cost of different media; \n Social mapping to identify key influencers and communicators in the society and their constituencies (e.g., academics and intelligentsia, politicians, youth leaders, women leaders, religious leaders, village leaders, commanders, celebrities, etc.); \n Traditional methods of communication; \n Cultural perceptions of the disabled, the chronically ill, rape survivors, extra-marital childbirth, mental health issues including post-traumatic stress, etc.; \n Literacy rates; \n Prevalence of intimate partner violence and sexual and gender-based violence; and \n Cultural moments and\/or religious holidays that may be used to amplify messages of peace and the benefits of DDR.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -117336,7 +117336,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Understanding the local context", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "; \\n Literacy rates; \\n Prevalence of intimate partner violence and sexual and gender-based violence; and \\n Cultural moments and\/or religious holidays that may be used to amplify messages of peace and the benefits of DDR.", + "Sentence": "; \n Literacy rates; \n Prevalence of intimate partner violence and sexual and gender-based violence; and \n Cultural moments and\/or religious holidays that may be used to amplify messages of peace and the benefits of DDR.", "newParagraph": "ensure ddr pisc strategy fit local need ddr practitioner understand social political cultural context identify factor shape attitude possible define behavioural objective design message bring required social change target audience issue analysis must adopted provide tailored approach engage different audience based concern issue attitude planning stage aim collect following minimum information aid practitioner understanding local context n conflict analysis including understanding local ethnic racial religious division national local level n gender analysis including role woman men girl boy society well gendered power structure society armed force group n medium mapping including geographic reach political slant cost different medium n social mapping identify key influencers communicator society constituency eg academic intelligentsia politician youth leader woman leader religious leader village leader commander celebrity etc n traditional method communication n cultural perception disabled chronically ill rape survivor extramarital childbirth mental health issue including posttraumatic stress etc n literacy rate n prevalence intimate partner violence sexual genderbased violence n cultural moment andor religious holiday may used amplify message peace benefit ddr", "ProcessedSent": " n literacy rate n prevalence intimate partner violence sexual genderbased violence n cultural moment andor religious holiday may used amplify message peace benefit ddr", "SentID": 6518 @@ -117415,7 +117415,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1977, - "Paragraph": "Two additional context determinants may fundamentally alter the design and delivery of the PI\/SC intervention: \\n The attitudes of community members towards ex-combatants, women and men formerly associated with armed forces and groups, and youth at risk; and \\n The presence of hate speech and\/or xenophobic discourse.", + "Paragraph": "Two additional context determinants may fundamentally alter the design and delivery of the PI\/SC intervention: \n The attitudes of community members towards ex-combatants, women and men formerly associated with armed forces and groups, and youth at risk; and \n The presence of hate speech and\/or xenophobic discourse.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -117426,14 +117426,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Understanding the local context", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Two additional context determinants may fundamentally alter the design and delivery of the PI\/SC intervention: \\n The attitudes of community members towards ex-combatants, women and men formerly associated with armed forces and groups, and youth at risk; and \\n The presence of hate speech and\/or xenophobic discourse.", + "Sentence": "Two additional context determinants may fundamentally alter the design and delivery of the PI\/SC intervention: \n The attitudes of community members towards ex-combatants, women and men formerly associated with armed forces and groups, and youth at risk; and \n The presence of hate speech and\/or xenophobic discourse.", "newParagraph": "two additional context determinant may fundamentally alter design delivery pisc intervention n attitude community member towards excombatants woman men formerly associated armed force group youth risk n presence hate speech andor xenophobic discourse", "ProcessedSent": "two additional context determinant may fundamentally alter design delivery pisc intervention n attitude community member towards excombatants woman men formerly associated armed force group youth risk n presence hate speech andor xenophobic discourse", "SentID": 6523 }, { "ParagraphID": 1978, - "Paragraph": "In this regard, DDR practitioners shall have a full understanding of how the open communication and publicity surrounding a DDR process may negatively impact the safety and security of participants, as well as DDR practitioners themselves. To this end, DDR practitioners should continuously assess and determine measures that need to be taken to adjust information related to the DDR process. These measures may include: \\n Removing and\/or amending specific designation of sensitive information related to the DDR process, including but not limited to the location of reception centres, the location of disarmament and demobilization sites, details related to the benefits provided to former members of armed forces and groups, and so forth; and \\n Ensuring the protection of the privacy, and rights thereof, of former members of armed forces and groups related to their identity, ensuring at all times that permission is obtained should any identifiable details be used in communication material (such as photo stories, testimonials or ex- combatant profiles).", + "Paragraph": "In this regard, DDR practitioners shall have a full understanding of how the open communication and publicity surrounding a DDR process may negatively impact the safety and security of participants, as well as DDR practitioners themselves. To this end, DDR practitioners should continuously assess and determine measures that need to be taken to adjust information related to the DDR process. These measures may include: \n Removing and\/or amending specific designation of sensitive information related to the DDR process, including but not limited to the location of reception centres, the location of disarmament and demobilization sites, details related to the benefits provided to former members of armed forces and groups, and so forth; and \n Ensuring the protection of the privacy, and rights thereof, of former members of armed forces and groups related to their identity, ensuring at all times that permission is obtained should any identifiable details be used in communication material (such as photo stories, testimonials or ex- combatant profiles).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -117451,7 +117451,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1978, - "Paragraph": "In this regard, DDR practitioners shall have a full understanding of how the open communication and publicity surrounding a DDR process may negatively impact the safety and security of participants, as well as DDR practitioners themselves. To this end, DDR practitioners should continuously assess and determine measures that need to be taken to adjust information related to the DDR process. These measures may include: \\n Removing and\/or amending specific designation of sensitive information related to the DDR process, including but not limited to the location of reception centres, the location of disarmament and demobilization sites, details related to the benefits provided to former members of armed forces and groups, and so forth; and \\n Ensuring the protection of the privacy, and rights thereof, of former members of armed forces and groups related to their identity, ensuring at all times that permission is obtained should any identifiable details be used in communication material (such as photo stories, testimonials or ex- combatant profiles).", + "Paragraph": "In this regard, DDR practitioners shall have a full understanding of how the open communication and publicity surrounding a DDR process may negatively impact the safety and security of participants, as well as DDR practitioners themselves. To this end, DDR practitioners should continuously assess and determine measures that need to be taken to adjust information related to the DDR process. These measures may include: \n Removing and\/or amending specific designation of sensitive information related to the DDR process, including but not limited to the location of reception centres, the location of disarmament and demobilization sites, details related to the benefits provided to former members of armed forces and groups, and so forth; and \n Ensuring the protection of the privacy, and rights thereof, of former members of armed forces and groups related to their identity, ensuring at all times that permission is obtained should any identifiable details be used in communication material (such as photo stories, testimonials or ex- combatant profiles).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -117469,7 +117469,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1978, - "Paragraph": "In this regard, DDR practitioners shall have a full understanding of how the open communication and publicity surrounding a DDR process may negatively impact the safety and security of participants, as well as DDR practitioners themselves. To this end, DDR practitioners should continuously assess and determine measures that need to be taken to adjust information related to the DDR process. These measures may include: \\n Removing and\/or amending specific designation of sensitive information related to the DDR process, including but not limited to the location of reception centres, the location of disarmament and demobilization sites, details related to the benefits provided to former members of armed forces and groups, and so forth; and \\n Ensuring the protection of the privacy, and rights thereof, of former members of armed forces and groups related to their identity, ensuring at all times that permission is obtained should any identifiable details be used in communication material (such as photo stories, testimonials or ex- combatant profiles).", + "Paragraph": "In this regard, DDR practitioners shall have a full understanding of how the open communication and publicity surrounding a DDR process may negatively impact the safety and security of participants, as well as DDR practitioners themselves. To this end, DDR practitioners should continuously assess and determine measures that need to be taken to adjust information related to the DDR process. These measures may include: \n Removing and\/or amending specific designation of sensitive information related to the DDR process, including but not limited to the location of reception centres, the location of disarmament and demobilization sites, details related to the benefits provided to former members of armed forces and groups, and so forth; and \n Ensuring the protection of the privacy, and rights thereof, of former members of armed forces and groups related to their identity, ensuring at all times that permission is obtained should any identifiable details be used in communication material (such as photo stories, testimonials or ex- combatant profiles).", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -117480,7 +117480,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Understanding the local context", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "These measures may include: \\n Removing and\/or amending specific designation of sensitive information related to the DDR process, including but not limited to the location of reception centres, the location of disarmament and demobilization sites, details related to the benefits provided to former members of armed forces and groups, and so forth; and \\n Ensuring the protection of the privacy, and rights thereof, of former members of armed forces and groups related to their identity, ensuring at all times that permission is obtained should any identifiable details be used in communication material (such as photo stories, testimonials or ex- combatant profiles).", + "Sentence": "These measures may include: \n Removing and\/or amending specific designation of sensitive information related to the DDR process, including but not limited to the location of reception centres, the location of disarmament and demobilization sites, details related to the benefits provided to former members of armed forces and groups, and so forth; and \n Ensuring the protection of the privacy, and rights thereof, of former members of armed forces and groups related to their identity, ensuring at all times that permission is obtained should any identifiable details be used in communication material (such as photo stories, testimonials or ex- combatant profiles).", "newParagraph": "regard ddr practitioner shall full understanding open communication publicity surrounding ddr process may negatively impact safety security participant well ddr practitioner end ddr practitioner continuously ass determine measure need taken adjust information related ddr process measure may include n removing andor amending specific designation sensitive information related ddr process including limited location reception centre location disarmament demobilization site detail related benefit provided former member armed force group forth n ensuring protection privacy right thereof former member armed force group related identity ensuring time permission obtained identifiable detail used communication material photo story testimonial ex combatant profile", "ProcessedSent": "measure may include n removing andor amending specific designation sensitive information related ddr process including limited location reception centre location disarmament demobilization site detail related benefit provided former member armed force group forth n ensuring protection privacy right thereof former member armed force group related identity ensuring time permission obtained identifiable detail used communication material photo story testimonial ex combatant profile", "SentID": 6526 @@ -117991,7 +117991,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1985, - "Paragraph": "Depending on the nature of the conflict, former members of armed forces and groups and their dependants may be the targets of hate speech. In some contexts, those who leave armed groups may be perceived, by some segments of the population, as traitors to the cause. They or their families may be targeted by hate speech, rumours, and other means of incitement to violence against them. As part of the planning for a DDR process in contexts where hate speech is occurring, DDR practitioners shall make all necessary efforts to include counter-narratives in the PI\/SC strategy. These measures may include the following: \\n Counter hate speech by using accurate and reliable information. \\n Include peaceful counter-narratives in education and communication skills training related to the DDR process (e.g., as part of training provided during reintegration support). \\n Incorporate media and information literacy skills to recognize and critically evaluate hate speech when engaging with communities. \\n Include specific language on hate speech in DDR policy documents and\/or related legislation. \\n Include narratives, stories, and other material that rehumanize ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups in strategic communication interventions in support of DDR processes.", + "Paragraph": "Depending on the nature of the conflict, former members of armed forces and groups and their dependants may be the targets of hate speech. In some contexts, those who leave armed groups may be perceived, by some segments of the population, as traitors to the cause. They or their families may be targeted by hate speech, rumours, and other means of incitement to violence against them. As part of the planning for a DDR process in contexts where hate speech is occurring, DDR practitioners shall make all necessary efforts to include counter-narratives in the PI\/SC strategy. These measures may include the following: \n Counter hate speech by using accurate and reliable information. \n Include peaceful counter-narratives in education and communication skills training related to the DDR process (e.g., as part of training provided during reintegration support). \n Incorporate media and information literacy skills to recognize and critically evaluate hate speech when engaging with communities. \n Include specific language on hate speech in DDR policy documents and\/or related legislation. \n Include narratives, stories, and other material that rehumanize ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups in strategic communication interventions in support of DDR processes.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118009,7 +118009,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1985, - "Paragraph": "Depending on the nature of the conflict, former members of armed forces and groups and their dependants may be the targets of hate speech. In some contexts, those who leave armed groups may be perceived, by some segments of the population, as traitors to the cause. They or their families may be targeted by hate speech, rumours, and other means of incitement to violence against them. As part of the planning for a DDR process in contexts where hate speech is occurring, DDR practitioners shall make all necessary efforts to include counter-narratives in the PI\/SC strategy. These measures may include the following: \\n Counter hate speech by using accurate and reliable information. \\n Include peaceful counter-narratives in education and communication skills training related to the DDR process (e.g., as part of training provided during reintegration support). \\n Incorporate media and information literacy skills to recognize and critically evaluate hate speech when engaging with communities. \\n Include specific language on hate speech in DDR policy documents and\/or related legislation. \\n Include narratives, stories, and other material that rehumanize ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups in strategic communication interventions in support of DDR processes.", + "Paragraph": "Depending on the nature of the conflict, former members of armed forces and groups and their dependants may be the targets of hate speech. In some contexts, those who leave armed groups may be perceived, by some segments of the population, as traitors to the cause. They or their families may be targeted by hate speech, rumours, and other means of incitement to violence against them. As part of the planning for a DDR process in contexts where hate speech is occurring, DDR practitioners shall make all necessary efforts to include counter-narratives in the PI\/SC strategy. These measures may include the following: \n Counter hate speech by using accurate and reliable information. \n Include peaceful counter-narratives in education and communication skills training related to the DDR process (e.g., as part of training provided during reintegration support). \n Incorporate media and information literacy skills to recognize and critically evaluate hate speech when engaging with communities. \n Include specific language on hate speech in DDR policy documents and\/or related legislation. \n Include narratives, stories, and other material that rehumanize ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups in strategic communication interventions in support of DDR processes.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118027,7 +118027,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1985, - "Paragraph": "Depending on the nature of the conflict, former members of armed forces and groups and their dependants may be the targets of hate speech. In some contexts, those who leave armed groups may be perceived, by some segments of the population, as traitors to the cause. They or their families may be targeted by hate speech, rumours, and other means of incitement to violence against them. As part of the planning for a DDR process in contexts where hate speech is occurring, DDR practitioners shall make all necessary efforts to include counter-narratives in the PI\/SC strategy. These measures may include the following: \\n Counter hate speech by using accurate and reliable information. \\n Include peaceful counter-narratives in education and communication skills training related to the DDR process (e.g., as part of training provided during reintegration support). \\n Incorporate media and information literacy skills to recognize and critically evaluate hate speech when engaging with communities. \\n Include specific language on hate speech in DDR policy documents and\/or related legislation. \\n Include narratives, stories, and other material that rehumanize ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups in strategic communication interventions in support of DDR processes.", + "Paragraph": "Depending on the nature of the conflict, former members of armed forces and groups and their dependants may be the targets of hate speech. In some contexts, those who leave armed groups may be perceived, by some segments of the population, as traitors to the cause. They or their families may be targeted by hate speech, rumours, and other means of incitement to violence against them. As part of the planning for a DDR process in contexts where hate speech is occurring, DDR practitioners shall make all necessary efforts to include counter-narratives in the PI\/SC strategy. These measures may include the following: \n Counter hate speech by using accurate and reliable information. \n Include peaceful counter-narratives in education and communication skills training related to the DDR process (e.g., as part of training provided during reintegration support). \n Incorporate media and information literacy skills to recognize and critically evaluate hate speech when engaging with communities. \n Include specific language on hate speech in DDR policy documents and\/or related legislation. \n Include narratives, stories, and other material that rehumanize ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups in strategic communication interventions in support of DDR processes.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118045,7 +118045,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1985, - "Paragraph": "Depending on the nature of the conflict, former members of armed forces and groups and their dependants may be the targets of hate speech. In some contexts, those who leave armed groups may be perceived, by some segments of the population, as traitors to the cause. They or their families may be targeted by hate speech, rumours, and other means of incitement to violence against them. As part of the planning for a DDR process in contexts where hate speech is occurring, DDR practitioners shall make all necessary efforts to include counter-narratives in the PI\/SC strategy. These measures may include the following: \\n Counter hate speech by using accurate and reliable information. \\n Include peaceful counter-narratives in education and communication skills training related to the DDR process (e.g., as part of training provided during reintegration support). \\n Incorporate media and information literacy skills to recognize and critically evaluate hate speech when engaging with communities. \\n Include specific language on hate speech in DDR policy documents and\/or related legislation. \\n Include narratives, stories, and other material that rehumanize ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups in strategic communication interventions in support of DDR processes.", + "Paragraph": "Depending on the nature of the conflict, former members of armed forces and groups and their dependants may be the targets of hate speech. In some contexts, those who leave armed groups may be perceived, by some segments of the population, as traitors to the cause. They or their families may be targeted by hate speech, rumours, and other means of incitement to violence against them. As part of the planning for a DDR process in contexts where hate speech is occurring, DDR practitioners shall make all necessary efforts to include counter-narratives in the PI\/SC strategy. These measures may include the following: \n Counter hate speech by using accurate and reliable information. \n Include peaceful counter-narratives in education and communication skills training related to the DDR process (e.g., as part of training provided during reintegration support). \n Incorporate media and information literacy skills to recognize and critically evaluate hate speech when engaging with communities. \n Include specific language on hate speech in DDR policy documents and\/or related legislation. \n Include narratives, stories, and other material that rehumanize ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups in strategic communication interventions in support of DDR processes.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118063,7 +118063,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1985, - "Paragraph": "Depending on the nature of the conflict, former members of armed forces and groups and their dependants may be the targets of hate speech. In some contexts, those who leave armed groups may be perceived, by some segments of the population, as traitors to the cause. They or their families may be targeted by hate speech, rumours, and other means of incitement to violence against them. As part of the planning for a DDR process in contexts where hate speech is occurring, DDR practitioners shall make all necessary efforts to include counter-narratives in the PI\/SC strategy. These measures may include the following: \\n Counter hate speech by using accurate and reliable information. \\n Include peaceful counter-narratives in education and communication skills training related to the DDR process (e.g., as part of training provided during reintegration support). \\n Incorporate media and information literacy skills to recognize and critically evaluate hate speech when engaging with communities. \\n Include specific language on hate speech in DDR policy documents and\/or related legislation. \\n Include narratives, stories, and other material that rehumanize ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups in strategic communication interventions in support of DDR processes.", + "Paragraph": "Depending on the nature of the conflict, former members of armed forces and groups and their dependants may be the targets of hate speech. In some contexts, those who leave armed groups may be perceived, by some segments of the population, as traitors to the cause. They or their families may be targeted by hate speech, rumours, and other means of incitement to violence against them. As part of the planning for a DDR process in contexts where hate speech is occurring, DDR practitioners shall make all necessary efforts to include counter-narratives in the PI\/SC strategy. These measures may include the following: \n Counter hate speech by using accurate and reliable information. \n Include peaceful counter-narratives in education and communication skills training related to the DDR process (e.g., as part of training provided during reintegration support). \n Incorporate media and information literacy skills to recognize and critically evaluate hate speech when engaging with communities. \n Include specific language on hate speech in DDR policy documents and\/or related legislation. \n Include narratives, stories, and other material that rehumanize ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups in strategic communication interventions in support of DDR processes.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118074,14 +118074,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.4 Hate speech and developing counter-narratives", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "These measures may include the following: \\n Counter hate speech by using accurate and reliable information.", + "Sentence": "These measures may include the following: \n Counter hate speech by using accurate and reliable information.", "newParagraph": "depending nature conflict former member armed force group dependant may target hate speech context leave armed group may perceived segment population traitor cause family may targeted hate speech rumour mean incitement violence part planning ddr process context hate speech occurring ddr practitioner shall make necessary effort include counternarratives pisc strategy measure may include following n counter hate speech using accurate reliable information n include peaceful counternarratives education communication skill training related ddr process eg part training provided reintegration support n incorporate medium information literacy skill recognize critically evaluate hate speech engaging community n include specific language hate speech ddr policy document andor related legislation n include narrative story material rehumanize excombatants person formerly associated armed force group strategic communication intervention support ddr process", "ProcessedSent": "measure may include following n counter hate speech using accurate reliable information", "SentID": 6559 }, { "ParagraphID": 1985, - "Paragraph": "Depending on the nature of the conflict, former members of armed forces and groups and their dependants may be the targets of hate speech. In some contexts, those who leave armed groups may be perceived, by some segments of the population, as traitors to the cause. They or their families may be targeted by hate speech, rumours, and other means of incitement to violence against them. As part of the planning for a DDR process in contexts where hate speech is occurring, DDR practitioners shall make all necessary efforts to include counter-narratives in the PI\/SC strategy. These measures may include the following: \\n Counter hate speech by using accurate and reliable information. \\n Include peaceful counter-narratives in education and communication skills training related to the DDR process (e.g., as part of training provided during reintegration support). \\n Incorporate media and information literacy skills to recognize and critically evaluate hate speech when engaging with communities. \\n Include specific language on hate speech in DDR policy documents and\/or related legislation. \\n Include narratives, stories, and other material that rehumanize ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups in strategic communication interventions in support of DDR processes.", + "Paragraph": "Depending on the nature of the conflict, former members of armed forces and groups and their dependants may be the targets of hate speech. In some contexts, those who leave armed groups may be perceived, by some segments of the population, as traitors to the cause. They or their families may be targeted by hate speech, rumours, and other means of incitement to violence against them. As part of the planning for a DDR process in contexts where hate speech is occurring, DDR practitioners shall make all necessary efforts to include counter-narratives in the PI\/SC strategy. These measures may include the following: \n Counter hate speech by using accurate and reliable information. \n Include peaceful counter-narratives in education and communication skills training related to the DDR process (e.g., as part of training provided during reintegration support). \n Incorporate media and information literacy skills to recognize and critically evaluate hate speech when engaging with communities. \n Include specific language on hate speech in DDR policy documents and\/or related legislation. \n Include narratives, stories, and other material that rehumanize ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups in strategic communication interventions in support of DDR processes.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118092,14 +118092,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.4 Hate speech and developing counter-narratives", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Include peaceful counter-narratives in education and communication skills training related to the DDR process (e.g., as part of training provided during reintegration support).", + "Sentence": "\n Include peaceful counter-narratives in education and communication skills training related to the DDR process (e.g., as part of training provided during reintegration support).", "newParagraph": "depending nature conflict former member armed force group dependant may target hate speech context leave armed group may perceived segment population traitor cause family may targeted hate speech rumour mean incitement violence part planning ddr process context hate speech occurring ddr practitioner shall make necessary effort include counternarratives pisc strategy measure may include following n counter hate speech using accurate reliable information n include peaceful counternarratives education communication skill training related ddr process eg part training provided reintegration support n incorporate medium information literacy skill recognize critically evaluate hate speech engaging community n include specific language hate speech ddr policy document andor related legislation n include narrative story material rehumanize excombatants person formerly associated armed force group strategic communication intervention support ddr process", "ProcessedSent": "n include peaceful counternarratives education communication skill training related ddr process eg part training provided reintegration support", "SentID": 6560 }, { "ParagraphID": 1985, - "Paragraph": "Depending on the nature of the conflict, former members of armed forces and groups and their dependants may be the targets of hate speech. In some contexts, those who leave armed groups may be perceived, by some segments of the population, as traitors to the cause. They or their families may be targeted by hate speech, rumours, and other means of incitement to violence against them. As part of the planning for a DDR process in contexts where hate speech is occurring, DDR practitioners shall make all necessary efforts to include counter-narratives in the PI\/SC strategy. These measures may include the following: \\n Counter hate speech by using accurate and reliable information. \\n Include peaceful counter-narratives in education and communication skills training related to the DDR process (e.g., as part of training provided during reintegration support). \\n Incorporate media and information literacy skills to recognize and critically evaluate hate speech when engaging with communities. \\n Include specific language on hate speech in DDR policy documents and\/or related legislation. \\n Include narratives, stories, and other material that rehumanize ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups in strategic communication interventions in support of DDR processes.", + "Paragraph": "Depending on the nature of the conflict, former members of armed forces and groups and their dependants may be the targets of hate speech. In some contexts, those who leave armed groups may be perceived, by some segments of the population, as traitors to the cause. They or their families may be targeted by hate speech, rumours, and other means of incitement to violence against them. As part of the planning for a DDR process in contexts where hate speech is occurring, DDR practitioners shall make all necessary efforts to include counter-narratives in the PI\/SC strategy. These measures may include the following: \n Counter hate speech by using accurate and reliable information. \n Include peaceful counter-narratives in education and communication skills training related to the DDR process (e.g., as part of training provided during reintegration support). \n Incorporate media and information literacy skills to recognize and critically evaluate hate speech when engaging with communities. \n Include specific language on hate speech in DDR policy documents and\/or related legislation. \n Include narratives, stories, and other material that rehumanize ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups in strategic communication interventions in support of DDR processes.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118110,14 +118110,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.4 Hate speech and developing counter-narratives", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Incorporate media and information literacy skills to recognize and critically evaluate hate speech when engaging with communities.", + "Sentence": "\n Incorporate media and information literacy skills to recognize and critically evaluate hate speech when engaging with communities.", "newParagraph": "depending nature conflict former member armed force group dependant may target hate speech context leave armed group may perceived segment population traitor cause family may targeted hate speech rumour mean incitement violence part planning ddr process context hate speech occurring ddr practitioner shall make necessary effort include counternarratives pisc strategy measure may include following n counter hate speech using accurate reliable information n include peaceful counternarratives education communication skill training related ddr process eg part training provided reintegration support n incorporate medium information literacy skill recognize critically evaluate hate speech engaging community n include specific language hate speech ddr policy document andor related legislation n include narrative story material rehumanize excombatants person formerly associated armed force group strategic communication intervention support ddr process", "ProcessedSent": "n incorporate medium information literacy skill recognize critically evaluate hate speech engaging community", "SentID": 6561 }, { "ParagraphID": 1985, - "Paragraph": "Depending on the nature of the conflict, former members of armed forces and groups and their dependants may be the targets of hate speech. In some contexts, those who leave armed groups may be perceived, by some segments of the population, as traitors to the cause. They or their families may be targeted by hate speech, rumours, and other means of incitement to violence against them. As part of the planning for a DDR process in contexts where hate speech is occurring, DDR practitioners shall make all necessary efforts to include counter-narratives in the PI\/SC strategy. These measures may include the following: \\n Counter hate speech by using accurate and reliable information. \\n Include peaceful counter-narratives in education and communication skills training related to the DDR process (e.g., as part of training provided during reintegration support). \\n Incorporate media and information literacy skills to recognize and critically evaluate hate speech when engaging with communities. \\n Include specific language on hate speech in DDR policy documents and\/or related legislation. \\n Include narratives, stories, and other material that rehumanize ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups in strategic communication interventions in support of DDR processes.", + "Paragraph": "Depending on the nature of the conflict, former members of armed forces and groups and their dependants may be the targets of hate speech. In some contexts, those who leave armed groups may be perceived, by some segments of the population, as traitors to the cause. They or their families may be targeted by hate speech, rumours, and other means of incitement to violence against them. As part of the planning for a DDR process in contexts where hate speech is occurring, DDR practitioners shall make all necessary efforts to include counter-narratives in the PI\/SC strategy. These measures may include the following: \n Counter hate speech by using accurate and reliable information. \n Include peaceful counter-narratives in education and communication skills training related to the DDR process (e.g., as part of training provided during reintegration support). \n Incorporate media and information literacy skills to recognize and critically evaluate hate speech when engaging with communities. \n Include specific language on hate speech in DDR policy documents and\/or related legislation. \n Include narratives, stories, and other material that rehumanize ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups in strategic communication interventions in support of DDR processes.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118128,14 +118128,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.4 Hate speech and developing counter-narratives", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Include specific language on hate speech in DDR policy documents and\/or related legislation.", + "Sentence": "\n Include specific language on hate speech in DDR policy documents and\/or related legislation.", "newParagraph": "depending nature conflict former member armed force group dependant may target hate speech context leave armed group may perceived segment population traitor cause family may targeted hate speech rumour mean incitement violence part planning ddr process context hate speech occurring ddr practitioner shall make necessary effort include counternarratives pisc strategy measure may include following n counter hate speech using accurate reliable information n include peaceful counternarratives education communication skill training related ddr process eg part training provided reintegration support n incorporate medium information literacy skill recognize critically evaluate hate speech engaging community n include specific language hate speech ddr policy document andor related legislation n include narrative story material rehumanize excombatants person formerly associated armed force group strategic communication intervention support ddr process", "ProcessedSent": "n include specific language hate speech ddr policy document andor related legislation", "SentID": 6562 }, { "ParagraphID": 1985, - "Paragraph": "Depending on the nature of the conflict, former members of armed forces and groups and their dependants may be the targets of hate speech. In some contexts, those who leave armed groups may be perceived, by some segments of the population, as traitors to the cause. They or their families may be targeted by hate speech, rumours, and other means of incitement to violence against them. As part of the planning for a DDR process in contexts where hate speech is occurring, DDR practitioners shall make all necessary efforts to include counter-narratives in the PI\/SC strategy. These measures may include the following: \\n Counter hate speech by using accurate and reliable information. \\n Include peaceful counter-narratives in education and communication skills training related to the DDR process (e.g., as part of training provided during reintegration support). \\n Incorporate media and information literacy skills to recognize and critically evaluate hate speech when engaging with communities. \\n Include specific language on hate speech in DDR policy documents and\/or related legislation. \\n Include narratives, stories, and other material that rehumanize ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups in strategic communication interventions in support of DDR processes.", + "Paragraph": "Depending on the nature of the conflict, former members of armed forces and groups and their dependants may be the targets of hate speech. In some contexts, those who leave armed groups may be perceived, by some segments of the population, as traitors to the cause. They or their families may be targeted by hate speech, rumours, and other means of incitement to violence against them. As part of the planning for a DDR process in contexts where hate speech is occurring, DDR practitioners shall make all necessary efforts to include counter-narratives in the PI\/SC strategy. These measures may include the following: \n Counter hate speech by using accurate and reliable information. \n Include peaceful counter-narratives in education and communication skills training related to the DDR process (e.g., as part of training provided during reintegration support). \n Incorporate media and information literacy skills to recognize and critically evaluate hate speech when engaging with communities. \n Include specific language on hate speech in DDR policy documents and\/or related legislation. \n Include narratives, stories, and other material that rehumanize ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups in strategic communication interventions in support of DDR processes.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118146,7 +118146,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.4 Hate speech and developing counter-narratives", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Include narratives, stories, and other material that rehumanize ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups in strategic communication interventions in support of DDR processes.", + "Sentence": "\n Include narratives, stories, and other material that rehumanize ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups in strategic communication interventions in support of DDR processes.", "newParagraph": "depending nature conflict former member armed force group dependant may target hate speech context leave armed group may perceived segment population traitor cause family may targeted hate speech rumour mean incitement violence part planning ddr process context hate speech occurring ddr practitioner shall make necessary effort include counternarratives pisc strategy measure may include following n counter hate speech using accurate reliable information n include peaceful counternarratives education communication skill training related ddr process eg part training provided reintegration support n incorporate medium information literacy skill recognize critically evaluate hate speech engaging community n include specific language hate speech ddr policy document andor related legislation n include narrative story material rehumanize excombatants person formerly associated armed force group strategic communication intervention support ddr process", "ProcessedSent": "n include narrative story material rehumanize excombatants person formerly associated armed force group strategic communication intervention support ddr process", "SentID": 6563 @@ -118333,7 +118333,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1990, - "Paragraph": "PI\/SC interventions and tools should include messaging on: \\n Women\u2019s and men\u2019s roles as leaders working in partnership; \\n Demilitarization of masculinities; \\n Positive gender norms, including men\u2019s roles in communities as fathers; \\n Destigmatization of psychosocial support services and individuals dealing with post-traumatic stress; \\n Promotion of non-violent behaviour; \\n Destigmatization of female combatants, females associated with armed forces and groups and their children, and male combatants; \\n Men\u2019s and women\u2019s mutual responsibility and awareness around reproductive health and HIV\/AIDS; \\n Women\u2019s empowerment; and \\n Destigmatization of victims\/survivors of sexual violence and their children.", + "Paragraph": "PI\/SC interventions and tools should include messaging on: \n Women\u2019s and men\u2019s roles as leaders working in partnership; \n Demilitarization of masculinities; \n Positive gender norms, including men\u2019s roles in communities as fathers; \n Destigmatization of psychosocial support services and individuals dealing with post-traumatic stress; \n Promotion of non-violent behaviour; \n Destigmatization of female combatants, females associated with armed forces and groups and their children, and male combatants; \n Men\u2019s and women\u2019s mutual responsibility and awareness around reproductive health and HIV\/AIDS; \n Women\u2019s empowerment; and \n Destigmatization of victims\/survivors of sexual violence and their children.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118344,7 +118344,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.5 Gender-sensitive PI\/SC for DDR", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "PI\/SC interventions and tools should include messaging on: \\n Women\u2019s and men\u2019s roles as leaders working in partnership; \\n Demilitarization of masculinities; \\n Positive gender norms, including men\u2019s roles in communities as fathers; \\n Destigmatization of psychosocial support services and individuals dealing with post-traumatic stress; \\n Promotion of non-violent behaviour; \\n Destigmatization of female combatants, females associated with armed forces and groups and their children, and male combatants; \\n Men\u2019s and women\u2019s mutual responsibility and awareness around reproductive health and HIV\/AIDS; \\n Women\u2019s empowerment; and \\n Destigmatization of victims\/survivors of sexual violence and their children.", + "Sentence": "PI\/SC interventions and tools should include messaging on: \n Women\u2019s and men\u2019s roles as leaders working in partnership; \n Demilitarization of masculinities; \n Positive gender norms, including men\u2019s roles in communities as fathers; \n Destigmatization of psychosocial support services and individuals dealing with post-traumatic stress; \n Promotion of non-violent behaviour; \n Destigmatization of female combatants, females associated with armed forces and groups and their children, and male combatants; \n Men\u2019s and women\u2019s mutual responsibility and awareness around reproductive health and HIV\/AIDS; \n Women\u2019s empowerment; and \n Destigmatization of victims\/survivors of sexual violence and their children.", "newParagraph": "pisc intervention tool include messaging n woman men role leader working partnership n demilitarization masculinity n positive gender norm including men role community father n destigmatization psychosocial support service individual dealing posttraumatic stress n promotion nonviolent behaviour n destigmatization female combatant female associated armed force group child male combatant n men woman mutual responsibility awareness around reproductive health hivaids n woman empowerment n destigmatization victimssurvivors sexual violence child", "ProcessedSent": "pisc intervention tool include messaging n woman men role leader working partnership n demilitarization masculinity n positive gender norm including men role community father n destigmatization psychosocial support service individual dealing posttraumatic stress n promotion nonviolent behaviour n destigmatization female combatant female associated armed force group child male combatant n men woman mutual responsibility awareness around reproductive health hivaids n woman empowerment n destigmatization victimssurvivors sexual violence child", "SentID": 6574 @@ -118531,7 +118531,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1994, - "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \\n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \\n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \\n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \\n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \\n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \\n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \\n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \\n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", + "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118542,14 +118542,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1 Primary audience (participants and beneficiaries)", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \\n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place.", + "Sentence": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place.", "newParagraph": "following stakeholder often primary audience ddr process n political leadership may include signatory ceasefires peace accord place political leadership may may represent military branch organization n military leadership armed force group leader may motivation interest differ political leadership entity likewise within military leadership midlevel commander may hold view concerning ddr process ddr practitioner recognize rankandfile member armed force group often receive information ddr immediate commander may incentive provide disinformation ddr reluctant subordinate leave military life n rankandfile armed force group important make distinction military leadership military commander midlevel commander rankandfile motivation interest may differ testimonial successfully demobilized reintegrated rankandfile proven effective informing peer excombatants person formerly associated armed force group play important role amplifying message aimed demonstrating life war n woman associated armed group force noncombat role important cater information need waafag especially abducted community particularly woman group also informed assist woman manage leave armed force group accord n child associated armed force group individual group need childfriendly age gendersensitive information help reassure safely remove illegally held armed force group community local authority police also informed assist child exited released armed group well protocol ensure protection child prompt handover child protection service n excombatants person formerly associated armed force group disability information sensitization opportunity access participate ddr reach group family community also informed support reintegration person disability n youth risk recruitment country affected conflict youth force positive change time group may vulnerable drawn renewed violence pisc strategy focus child mature adult specific need experience youth missed n local authority receiving community enabling smooth reintegration ddr participant community vital success ddr community leader also important role play locallevel ddr activity cvr programme transitional wam well communitybased reintegration support", "ProcessedSent": "following stakeholder often primary audience ddr process n political leadership may include signatory ceasefires peace accord place", "SentID": 6585 }, { "ParagraphID": 1994, - "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \\n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \\n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \\n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \\n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \\n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \\n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \\n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \\n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", + "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118567,7 +118567,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1994, - "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \\n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \\n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \\n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \\n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \\n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \\n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \\n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \\n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", + "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118578,14 +118578,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1 Primary audience (participants and beneficiaries)", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities.", + "Sentence": "\n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities.", "newParagraph": "following stakeholder often primary audience ddr process n political leadership may include signatory ceasefires peace accord place political leadership may may represent military branch organization n military leadership armed force group leader may motivation interest differ political leadership entity likewise within military leadership midlevel commander may hold view concerning ddr process ddr practitioner recognize rankandfile member armed force group often receive information ddr immediate commander may incentive provide disinformation ddr reluctant subordinate leave military life n rankandfile armed force group important make distinction military leadership military commander midlevel commander rankandfile motivation interest may differ testimonial successfully demobilized reintegrated rankandfile proven effective informing peer excombatants person formerly associated armed force group play important role amplifying message aimed demonstrating life war n woman associated armed group force noncombat role important cater information need waafag especially abducted community particularly woman group also informed assist woman manage leave armed force group accord n child associated armed force group individual group need childfriendly age gendersensitive information help reassure safely remove illegally held armed force group community local authority police also informed assist child exited released armed group well protocol ensure protection child prompt handover child protection service n excombatants person formerly associated armed force group disability information sensitization opportunity access participate ddr reach group family community also informed support reintegration person disability n youth risk recruitment country affected conflict youth force positive change time group may vulnerable drawn renewed violence pisc strategy focus child mature adult specific need experience youth missed n local authority receiving community enabling smooth reintegration ddr participant community vital success ddr community leader also important role play locallevel ddr activity cvr programme transitional wam well communitybased reintegration support", "ProcessedSent": "n military leadership armed force group leader may motivation interest differ political leadership entity", "SentID": 6587 }, { "ParagraphID": 1994, - "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \\n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \\n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \\n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \\n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \\n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \\n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \\n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \\n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", + "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118603,7 +118603,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1994, - "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \\n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \\n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \\n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \\n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \\n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \\n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \\n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \\n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", + "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118621,7 +118621,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1994, - "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \\n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \\n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \\n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \\n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \\n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \\n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \\n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \\n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", + "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118632,14 +118632,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1 Primary audience (participants and beneficiaries)", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ.", + "Sentence": "\n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ.", "newParagraph": "following stakeholder often primary audience ddr process n political leadership may include signatory ceasefires peace accord place political leadership may may represent military branch organization n military leadership armed force group leader may motivation interest differ political leadership entity likewise within military leadership midlevel commander may hold view concerning ddr process ddr practitioner recognize rankandfile member armed force group often receive information ddr immediate commander may incentive provide disinformation ddr reluctant subordinate leave military life n rankandfile armed force group important make distinction military leadership military commander midlevel commander rankandfile motivation interest may differ testimonial successfully demobilized reintegrated rankandfile proven effective informing peer excombatants person formerly associated armed force group play important role amplifying message aimed demonstrating life war n woman associated armed group force noncombat role important cater information need waafag especially abducted community particularly woman group also informed assist woman manage leave armed force group accord n child associated armed force group individual group need childfriendly age gendersensitive information help reassure safely remove illegally held armed force group community local authority police also informed assist child exited released armed group well protocol ensure protection child prompt handover child protection service n excombatants person formerly associated armed force group disability information sensitization opportunity access participate ddr reach group family community also informed support reintegration person disability n youth risk recruitment country affected conflict youth force positive change time group may vulnerable drawn renewed violence pisc strategy focus child mature adult specific need experience youth missed n local authority receiving community enabling smooth reintegration ddr participant community vital success ddr community leader also important role play locallevel ddr activity cvr programme transitional wam well communitybased reintegration support", "ProcessedSent": "n rankandfile armed force group important make distinction military leadership military commander midlevel commander rankandfile motivation interest may differ", "SentID": 6590 }, { "ParagraphID": 1994, - "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \\n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \\n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \\n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \\n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \\n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \\n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \\n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \\n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", + "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118657,7 +118657,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1994, - "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \\n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \\n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \\n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \\n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \\n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \\n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \\n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \\n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", + "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118675,7 +118675,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1994, - "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \\n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \\n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \\n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \\n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \\n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \\n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \\n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \\n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", + "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118686,14 +118686,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1 Primary audience (participants and beneficiaries)", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted.", + "Sentence": "\n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted.", "newParagraph": "following stakeholder often primary audience ddr process n political leadership may include signatory ceasefires peace accord place political leadership may may represent military branch organization n military leadership armed force group leader may motivation interest differ political leadership entity likewise within military leadership midlevel commander may hold view concerning ddr process ddr practitioner recognize rankandfile member armed force group often receive information ddr immediate commander may incentive provide disinformation ddr reluctant subordinate leave military life n rankandfile armed force group important make distinction military leadership military commander midlevel commander rankandfile motivation interest may differ testimonial successfully demobilized reintegrated rankandfile proven effective informing peer excombatants person formerly associated armed force group play important role amplifying message aimed demonstrating life war n woman associated armed group force noncombat role important cater information need waafag especially abducted community particularly woman group also informed assist woman manage leave armed force group accord n child associated armed force group individual group need childfriendly age gendersensitive information help reassure safely remove illegally held armed force group community local authority police also informed assist child exited released armed group well protocol ensure protection child prompt handover child protection service n excombatants person formerly associated armed force group disability information sensitization opportunity access participate ddr reach group family community also informed support reintegration person disability n youth risk recruitment country affected conflict youth force positive change time group may vulnerable drawn renewed violence pisc strategy focus child mature adult specific need experience youth missed n local authority receiving community enabling smooth reintegration ddr participant community vital success ddr community leader also important role play locallevel ddr activity cvr programme transitional wam well communitybased reintegration support", "ProcessedSent": "n woman associated armed group force noncombat role important cater information need waafag especially abducted", "SentID": 6593 }, { "ParagraphID": 1994, - "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \\n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \\n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \\n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \\n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \\n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \\n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \\n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \\n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", + "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118711,7 +118711,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1994, - "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \\n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \\n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \\n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \\n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \\n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \\n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \\n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \\n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", + "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118722,14 +118722,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1 Primary audience (participants and beneficiaries)", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group.", + "Sentence": "\n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group.", "newParagraph": "following stakeholder often primary audience ddr process n political leadership may include signatory ceasefires peace accord place political leadership may may represent military branch organization n military leadership armed force group leader may motivation interest differ political leadership entity likewise within military leadership midlevel commander may hold view concerning ddr process ddr practitioner recognize rankandfile member armed force group often receive information ddr immediate commander may incentive provide disinformation ddr reluctant subordinate leave military life n rankandfile armed force group important make distinction military leadership military commander midlevel commander rankandfile motivation interest may differ testimonial successfully demobilized reintegrated rankandfile proven effective informing peer excombatants person formerly associated armed force group play important role amplifying message aimed demonstrating life war n woman associated armed group force noncombat role important cater information need waafag especially abducted community particularly woman group also informed assist woman manage leave armed force group accord n child associated armed force group individual group need childfriendly age gendersensitive information help reassure safely remove illegally held armed force group community local authority police also informed assist child exited released armed group well protocol ensure protection child prompt handover child protection service n excombatants person formerly associated armed force group disability information sensitization opportunity access participate ddr reach group family community also informed support reintegration person disability n youth risk recruitment country affected conflict youth force positive change time group may vulnerable drawn renewed violence pisc strategy focus child mature adult specific need experience youth missed n local authority receiving community enabling smooth reintegration ddr participant community vital success ddr community leader also important role play locallevel ddr activity cvr programme transitional wam well communitybased reintegration support", "ProcessedSent": "n child associated armed force group individual group need childfriendly age gendersensitive information help reassure safely remove illegally held armed force group", "SentID": 6595 }, { "ParagraphID": 1994, - "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \\n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \\n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \\n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \\n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \\n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \\n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \\n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \\n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", + "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118747,7 +118747,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1994, - "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \\n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \\n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \\n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \\n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \\n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \\n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \\n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \\n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", + "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118758,14 +118758,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1 Primary audience (participants and beneficiaries)", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group.", + "Sentence": "\n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group.", "newParagraph": "following stakeholder often primary audience ddr process n political leadership may include signatory ceasefires peace accord place political leadership may may represent military branch organization n military leadership armed force group leader may motivation interest differ political leadership entity likewise within military leadership midlevel commander may hold view concerning ddr process ddr practitioner recognize rankandfile member armed force group often receive information ddr immediate commander may incentive provide disinformation ddr reluctant subordinate leave military life n rankandfile armed force group important make distinction military leadership military commander midlevel commander rankandfile motivation interest may differ testimonial successfully demobilized reintegrated rankandfile proven effective informing peer excombatants person formerly associated armed force group play important role amplifying message aimed demonstrating life war n woman associated armed group force noncombat role important cater information need waafag especially abducted community particularly woman group also informed assist woman manage leave armed force group accord n child associated armed force group individual group need childfriendly age gendersensitive information help reassure safely remove illegally held armed force group community local authority police also informed assist child exited released armed group well protocol ensure protection child prompt handover child protection service n excombatants person formerly associated armed force group disability information sensitization opportunity access participate ddr reach group family community also informed support reintegration person disability n youth risk recruitment country affected conflict youth force positive change time group may vulnerable drawn renewed violence pisc strategy focus child mature adult specific need experience youth missed n local authority receiving community enabling smooth reintegration ddr participant community vital success ddr community leader also important role play locallevel ddr activity cvr programme transitional wam well communitybased reintegration support", "ProcessedSent": "n excombatants person formerly associated armed force group disability information sensitization opportunity access participate ddr reach group", "SentID": 6597 }, { "ParagraphID": 1994, - "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \\n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \\n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \\n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \\n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \\n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \\n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \\n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \\n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", + "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118783,7 +118783,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1994, - "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \\n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \\n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \\n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \\n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \\n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \\n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \\n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \\n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", + "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118794,14 +118794,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1 Primary audience (participants and beneficiaries)", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence.", + "Sentence": "\n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence.", "newParagraph": "following stakeholder often primary audience ddr process n political leadership may include signatory ceasefires peace accord place political leadership may may represent military branch organization n military leadership armed force group leader may motivation interest differ political leadership entity likewise within military leadership midlevel commander may hold view concerning ddr process ddr practitioner recognize rankandfile member armed force group often receive information ddr immediate commander may incentive provide disinformation ddr reluctant subordinate leave military life n rankandfile armed force group important make distinction military leadership military commander midlevel commander rankandfile motivation interest may differ testimonial successfully demobilized reintegrated rankandfile proven effective informing peer excombatants person formerly associated armed force group play important role amplifying message aimed demonstrating life war n woman associated armed group force noncombat role important cater information need waafag especially abducted community particularly woman group also informed assist woman manage leave armed force group accord n child associated armed force group individual group need childfriendly age gendersensitive information help reassure safely remove illegally held armed force group community local authority police also informed assist child exited released armed group well protocol ensure protection child prompt handover child protection service n excombatants person formerly associated armed force group disability information sensitization opportunity access participate ddr reach group family community also informed support reintegration person disability n youth risk recruitment country affected conflict youth force positive change time group may vulnerable drawn renewed violence pisc strategy focus child mature adult specific need experience youth missed n local authority receiving community enabling smooth reintegration ddr participant community vital success ddr community leader also important role play locallevel ddr activity cvr programme transitional wam well communitybased reintegration support", "ProcessedSent": "n youth risk recruitment country affected conflict youth force positive change time group may vulnerable drawn renewed violence", "SentID": 6599 }, { "ParagraphID": 1994, - "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \\n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \\n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \\n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \\n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \\n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \\n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \\n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \\n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", + "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118819,7 +118819,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1994, - "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \\n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \\n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \\n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \\n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \\n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \\n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \\n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \\n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", + "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118830,14 +118830,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1 Primary audience (participants and beneficiaries)", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR.", + "Sentence": "\n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR.", "newParagraph": "following stakeholder often primary audience ddr process n political leadership may include signatory ceasefires peace accord place political leadership may may represent military branch organization n military leadership armed force group leader may motivation interest differ political leadership entity likewise within military leadership midlevel commander may hold view concerning ddr process ddr practitioner recognize rankandfile member armed force group often receive information ddr immediate commander may incentive provide disinformation ddr reluctant subordinate leave military life n rankandfile armed force group important make distinction military leadership military commander midlevel commander rankandfile motivation interest may differ testimonial successfully demobilized reintegrated rankandfile proven effective informing peer excombatants person formerly associated armed force group play important role amplifying message aimed demonstrating life war n woman associated armed group force noncombat role important cater information need waafag especially abducted community particularly woman group also informed assist woman manage leave armed force group accord n child associated armed force group individual group need childfriendly age gendersensitive information help reassure safely remove illegally held armed force group community local authority police also informed assist child exited released armed group well protocol ensure protection child prompt handover child protection service n excombatants person formerly associated armed force group disability information sensitization opportunity access participate ddr reach group family community also informed support reintegration person disability n youth risk recruitment country affected conflict youth force positive change time group may vulnerable drawn renewed violence pisc strategy focus child mature adult specific need experience youth missed n local authority receiving community enabling smooth reintegration ddr participant community vital success ddr community leader also important role play locallevel ddr activity cvr programme transitional wam well communitybased reintegration support", "ProcessedSent": "n local authority receiving community enabling smooth reintegration ddr participant community vital success ddr", "SentID": 6601 }, { "ParagraphID": 1994, - "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \\n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \\n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \\n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \\n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \\n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \\n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \\n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \\n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", + "Paragraph": "The following stakeholders are often the primary audience of a DDR process: \n The political leadership: This may include the signatories of ceasefires and peace accords, when they are in place. Political leaderships may or may not represent the military branches of their organizations. \n The military leadership of armed forces and groups: These leaders may have motivations and interests that differ from the political leaderships of these entities. Likewise, within these military leaderships, mid-level commanders may hold their own views concerning the DDR process. DDR practitioners should recognize that the rank-and-file members of armed forces and groups often receive information about DDR from their immediate commanders, who may have incentives to provide disinformation about DDR if they are reluctant for their subordinates to leave military life. \n Rank-and-file of armed forces and groups: It is important to make the distinction between military leaderships, military commanders, mid-level commanders and their rank-and-file, because their motivations and interests may differ. Testimonials from the successfully demobilized and reintegrated rank-and-file have proven to be effective in informing their peers. Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups can play an important role in amplifying messages aimed at demonstrating life after war. \n Women associated with armed groups and forces in non-combat roles: It is important to cater to the information needs of WAAFAG, especially those who have been abducted. Communities, particularly women\u2019s groups, should also be informed about how to further assist women who manage to leave an armed force or group of their own accord. \n Children associated with armed forces and groups: Individuals in this group need child-friendly, age- and gender-sensitive information to help reassure and safely remove those who are illegally held by an armed force or group. Communities, local authorities and police should also be informed about how to assist children who have exited or been released from armed groups, as well as about protocols to ensure the protection of children and their prompt handover to child protection services. \n Ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups with disabilities: Information and sensitization to opportunities to access and participate in DDR should reach this group. Families and communities should also be informed on how to support the reintegration of persons with disabilities. \n Youth at risk of recruitment: In countries affected by conflict, youth are both a force for positive change and, at the same time, a group that may be vulnerable to being drawn into renewed violence. When PI\/SC strategies focus only on children and mature adults, the specific needs and experiences of youth are missed. \n Local authorities and receiving communities: Enabling the smooth reintegration of DDR participants into their communities is vital to the success of DDR. Communities and their leaders also have an important role to play in other local-level DDR activities, such as CVR programmes and transitional WAM as well as community-based reintegration support.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118855,7 +118855,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1995, - "Paragraph": "In many cases, partnerships with other stakeholders are required to support the design, planning and implementation of the PI\/SC strategy. The following partners are often the secondary audience of a DDR process; however, depending on the context, they may also be the primary audience (e.g., the international community in a regionalized armed conflict): \\n Civil society: This includes women\u2019s groups, youth groups, local associations and non- governmental organizations that play a role in the DDR process, including those working as implementing partners of national and international governmental institutions. \\n Religious leaders and institutions: The voices of moderate religious leaders can be amplified and coordinated with educators to foster coordination and promote messages of peace and tolerance. \\n Legislative and policy-setting authorities: The legal framework in the country regulating the media can be reviewed and laws put in place to prevent the distribution of messages inciting hate or spreading misinformation. If this approach is used, care must be taken to ensure that civil and political rights are not affected. \\n International and local media: International and local media are often the main source of information on progress in the peace process. Keeping both media segments supplied with accurate and up-to-date information on the planning and implementation of DDR is important in order to increase support for the process and avoid bad press. The media are also key whistleblowers that can identify, expose and denounce potential spoilers of the peace process. \\n Private sector: Companies in the private sector can also be important amplifiers and partners, for example, by generating specific recruitment advertisements in support of reintegration opportunities. Local telecommunication companies and internet service providers can also offer avenues to further disseminate key messages. \\n Opinion leaders\/influencers: In many contexts, opinion leaders are public personalities who actively produce and interpret multiple sources of information to form an opinion. With the advent of social media, these actors generate viewership and large followings through regular programming and online presence. \\n Regional stakeholders: These include Governments, regional organizations, military and political parties of neighbouring countries, civil society in neighboring States, businesses and potential spoilers. \\n The international community: This includes donors, their constituencies (including, if applicable, the diaspora who can influence the direction of DDR), troop-contributing countries, the UN system, international financial institutions, non-governmental organizations and think tanks.", + "Paragraph": "In many cases, partnerships with other stakeholders are required to support the design, planning and implementation of the PI\/SC strategy. The following partners are often the secondary audience of a DDR process; however, depending on the context, they may also be the primary audience (e.g., the international community in a regionalized armed conflict): \n Civil society: This includes women\u2019s groups, youth groups, local associations and non- governmental organizations that play a role in the DDR process, including those working as implementing partners of national and international governmental institutions. \n Religious leaders and institutions: The voices of moderate religious leaders can be amplified and coordinated with educators to foster coordination and promote messages of peace and tolerance. \n Legislative and policy-setting authorities: The legal framework in the country regulating the media can be reviewed and laws put in place to prevent the distribution of messages inciting hate or spreading misinformation. If this approach is used, care must be taken to ensure that civil and political rights are not affected. \n International and local media: International and local media are often the main source of information on progress in the peace process. Keeping both media segments supplied with accurate and up-to-date information on the planning and implementation of DDR is important in order to increase support for the process and avoid bad press. The media are also key whistleblowers that can identify, expose and denounce potential spoilers of the peace process. \n Private sector: Companies in the private sector can also be important amplifiers and partners, for example, by generating specific recruitment advertisements in support of reintegration opportunities. Local telecommunication companies and internet service providers can also offer avenues to further disseminate key messages. \n Opinion leaders\/influencers: In many contexts, opinion leaders are public personalities who actively produce and interpret multiple sources of information to form an opinion. With the advent of social media, these actors generate viewership and large followings through regular programming and online presence. \n Regional stakeholders: These include Governments, regional organizations, military and political parties of neighbouring countries, civil society in neighboring States, businesses and potential spoilers. \n The international community: This includes donors, their constituencies (including, if applicable, the diaspora who can influence the direction of DDR), troop-contributing countries, the UN system, international financial institutions, non-governmental organizations and think tanks.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118873,7 +118873,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1995, - "Paragraph": "In many cases, partnerships with other stakeholders are required to support the design, planning and implementation of the PI\/SC strategy. The following partners are often the secondary audience of a DDR process; however, depending on the context, they may also be the primary audience (e.g., the international community in a regionalized armed conflict): \\n Civil society: This includes women\u2019s groups, youth groups, local associations and non- governmental organizations that play a role in the DDR process, including those working as implementing partners of national and international governmental institutions. \\n Religious leaders and institutions: The voices of moderate religious leaders can be amplified and coordinated with educators to foster coordination and promote messages of peace and tolerance. \\n Legislative and policy-setting authorities: The legal framework in the country regulating the media can be reviewed and laws put in place to prevent the distribution of messages inciting hate or spreading misinformation. If this approach is used, care must be taken to ensure that civil and political rights are not affected. \\n International and local media: International and local media are often the main source of information on progress in the peace process. Keeping both media segments supplied with accurate and up-to-date information on the planning and implementation of DDR is important in order to increase support for the process and avoid bad press. The media are also key whistleblowers that can identify, expose and denounce potential spoilers of the peace process. \\n Private sector: Companies in the private sector can also be important amplifiers and partners, for example, by generating specific recruitment advertisements in support of reintegration opportunities. Local telecommunication companies and internet service providers can also offer avenues to further disseminate key messages. \\n Opinion leaders\/influencers: In many contexts, opinion leaders are public personalities who actively produce and interpret multiple sources of information to form an opinion. With the advent of social media, these actors generate viewership and large followings through regular programming and online presence. \\n Regional stakeholders: These include Governments, regional organizations, military and political parties of neighbouring countries, civil society in neighboring States, businesses and potential spoilers. \\n The international community: This includes donors, their constituencies (including, if applicable, the diaspora who can influence the direction of DDR), troop-contributing countries, the UN system, international financial institutions, non-governmental organizations and think tanks.", + "Paragraph": "In many cases, partnerships with other stakeholders are required to support the design, planning and implementation of the PI\/SC strategy. The following partners are often the secondary audience of a DDR process; however, depending on the context, they may also be the primary audience (e.g., the international community in a regionalized armed conflict): \n Civil society: This includes women\u2019s groups, youth groups, local associations and non- governmental organizations that play a role in the DDR process, including those working as implementing partners of national and international governmental institutions. \n Religious leaders and institutions: The voices of moderate religious leaders can be amplified and coordinated with educators to foster coordination and promote messages of peace and tolerance. \n Legislative and policy-setting authorities: The legal framework in the country regulating the media can be reviewed and laws put in place to prevent the distribution of messages inciting hate or spreading misinformation. If this approach is used, care must be taken to ensure that civil and political rights are not affected. \n International and local media: International and local media are often the main source of information on progress in the peace process. Keeping both media segments supplied with accurate and up-to-date information on the planning and implementation of DDR is important in order to increase support for the process and avoid bad press. The media are also key whistleblowers that can identify, expose and denounce potential spoilers of the peace process. \n Private sector: Companies in the private sector can also be important amplifiers and partners, for example, by generating specific recruitment advertisements in support of reintegration opportunities. Local telecommunication companies and internet service providers can also offer avenues to further disseminate key messages. \n Opinion leaders\/influencers: In many contexts, opinion leaders are public personalities who actively produce and interpret multiple sources of information to form an opinion. With the advent of social media, these actors generate viewership and large followings through regular programming and online presence. \n Regional stakeholders: These include Governments, regional organizations, military and political parties of neighbouring countries, civil society in neighboring States, businesses and potential spoilers. \n The international community: This includes donors, their constituencies (including, if applicable, the diaspora who can influence the direction of DDR), troop-contributing countries, the UN system, international financial institutions, non-governmental organizations and think tanks.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118884,14 +118884,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Secondary audience (partners)", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The following partners are often the secondary audience of a DDR process; however, depending on the context, they may also be the primary audience (e.g., the international community in a regionalized armed conflict): \\n Civil society: This includes women\u2019s groups, youth groups, local associations and non- governmental organizations that play a role in the DDR process, including those working as implementing partners of national and international governmental institutions.", + "Sentence": "The following partners are often the secondary audience of a DDR process; however, depending on the context, they may also be the primary audience (e.g., the international community in a regionalized armed conflict): \n Civil society: This includes women\u2019s groups, youth groups, local associations and non- governmental organizations that play a role in the DDR process, including those working as implementing partners of national and international governmental institutions.", "newParagraph": "many case partnership stakeholder required support design planning implementation pisc strategy following partner often secondary audience ddr process however depending context may also primary audience eg international community regionalized armed conflict n civil society includes woman group youth group local association non governmental organization play role ddr process including working implementing partner national international governmental institution n religious leader institution voice moderate religious leader amplified coordinated educator foster coordination promote message peace tolerance n legislative policysetting authority legal framework country regulating medium reviewed law put place prevent distribution message inciting hate spreading misinformation approach used care must taken ensure civil political right affected n international local medium international local medium often main source information progress peace process keeping medium segment supplied accurate uptodate information planning implementation ddr important order increase support process avoid bad press medium also key whistleblower identify expose denounce potential spoiler peace process n private sector company private sector also important amplifier partner example generating specific recruitment advertisement support reintegration opportunity local telecommunication company internet service provider also offer avenue disseminate key message n opinion leadersinfluencers many context opinion leader public personality actively produce interpret multiple source information form opinion advent social medium actor generate viewership large following regular programming online presence n regional stakeholder include government regional organization military political party neighbouring country civil society neighboring state business potential spoiler n international community includes donor constituency including applicable diaspora influence direction ddr troopcontributing country un system international financial institution nongovernmental organization think tank", "ProcessedSent": "following partner often secondary audience ddr process however depending context may also primary audience eg international community regionalized armed conflict n civil society includes woman group youth group local association non governmental organization play role ddr process including working implementing partner national international governmental institution", "SentID": 6604 }, { "ParagraphID": 1995, - "Paragraph": "In many cases, partnerships with other stakeholders are required to support the design, planning and implementation of the PI\/SC strategy. The following partners are often the secondary audience of a DDR process; however, depending on the context, they may also be the primary audience (e.g., the international community in a regionalized armed conflict): \\n Civil society: This includes women\u2019s groups, youth groups, local associations and non- governmental organizations that play a role in the DDR process, including those working as implementing partners of national and international governmental institutions. \\n Religious leaders and institutions: The voices of moderate religious leaders can be amplified and coordinated with educators to foster coordination and promote messages of peace and tolerance. \\n Legislative and policy-setting authorities: The legal framework in the country regulating the media can be reviewed and laws put in place to prevent the distribution of messages inciting hate or spreading misinformation. If this approach is used, care must be taken to ensure that civil and political rights are not affected. \\n International and local media: International and local media are often the main source of information on progress in the peace process. Keeping both media segments supplied with accurate and up-to-date information on the planning and implementation of DDR is important in order to increase support for the process and avoid bad press. The media are also key whistleblowers that can identify, expose and denounce potential spoilers of the peace process. \\n Private sector: Companies in the private sector can also be important amplifiers and partners, for example, by generating specific recruitment advertisements in support of reintegration opportunities. Local telecommunication companies and internet service providers can also offer avenues to further disseminate key messages. \\n Opinion leaders\/influencers: In many contexts, opinion leaders are public personalities who actively produce and interpret multiple sources of information to form an opinion. With the advent of social media, these actors generate viewership and large followings through regular programming and online presence. \\n Regional stakeholders: These include Governments, regional organizations, military and political parties of neighbouring countries, civil society in neighboring States, businesses and potential spoilers. \\n The international community: This includes donors, their constituencies (including, if applicable, the diaspora who can influence the direction of DDR), troop-contributing countries, the UN system, international financial institutions, non-governmental organizations and think tanks.", + "Paragraph": "In many cases, partnerships with other stakeholders are required to support the design, planning and implementation of the PI\/SC strategy. The following partners are often the secondary audience of a DDR process; however, depending on the context, they may also be the primary audience (e.g., the international community in a regionalized armed conflict): \n Civil society: This includes women\u2019s groups, youth groups, local associations and non- governmental organizations that play a role in the DDR process, including those working as implementing partners of national and international governmental institutions. \n Religious leaders and institutions: The voices of moderate religious leaders can be amplified and coordinated with educators to foster coordination and promote messages of peace and tolerance. \n Legislative and policy-setting authorities: The legal framework in the country regulating the media can be reviewed and laws put in place to prevent the distribution of messages inciting hate or spreading misinformation. If this approach is used, care must be taken to ensure that civil and political rights are not affected. \n International and local media: International and local media are often the main source of information on progress in the peace process. Keeping both media segments supplied with accurate and up-to-date information on the planning and implementation of DDR is important in order to increase support for the process and avoid bad press. The media are also key whistleblowers that can identify, expose and denounce potential spoilers of the peace process. \n Private sector: Companies in the private sector can also be important amplifiers and partners, for example, by generating specific recruitment advertisements in support of reintegration opportunities. Local telecommunication companies and internet service providers can also offer avenues to further disseminate key messages. \n Opinion leaders\/influencers: In many contexts, opinion leaders are public personalities who actively produce and interpret multiple sources of information to form an opinion. With the advent of social media, these actors generate viewership and large followings through regular programming and online presence. \n Regional stakeholders: These include Governments, regional organizations, military and political parties of neighbouring countries, civil society in neighboring States, businesses and potential spoilers. \n The international community: This includes donors, their constituencies (including, if applicable, the diaspora who can influence the direction of DDR), troop-contributing countries, the UN system, international financial institutions, non-governmental organizations and think tanks.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118902,14 +118902,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Secondary audience (partners)", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Religious leaders and institutions: The voices of moderate religious leaders can be amplified and coordinated with educators to foster coordination and promote messages of peace and tolerance.", + "Sentence": "\n Religious leaders and institutions: The voices of moderate religious leaders can be amplified and coordinated with educators to foster coordination and promote messages of peace and tolerance.", "newParagraph": "many case partnership stakeholder required support design planning implementation pisc strategy following partner often secondary audience ddr process however depending context may also primary audience eg international community regionalized armed conflict n civil society includes woman group youth group local association non governmental organization play role ddr process including working implementing partner national international governmental institution n religious leader institution voice moderate religious leader amplified coordinated educator foster coordination promote message peace tolerance n legislative policysetting authority legal framework country regulating medium reviewed law put place prevent distribution message inciting hate spreading misinformation approach used care must taken ensure civil political right affected n international local medium international local medium often main source information progress peace process keeping medium segment supplied accurate uptodate information planning implementation ddr important order increase support process avoid bad press medium also key whistleblower identify expose denounce potential spoiler peace process n private sector company private sector also important amplifier partner example generating specific recruitment advertisement support reintegration opportunity local telecommunication company internet service provider also offer avenue disseminate key message n opinion leadersinfluencers many context opinion leader public personality actively produce interpret multiple source information form opinion advent social medium actor generate viewership large following regular programming online presence n regional stakeholder include government regional organization military political party neighbouring country civil society neighboring state business potential spoiler n international community includes donor constituency including applicable diaspora influence direction ddr troopcontributing country un system international financial institution nongovernmental organization think tank", "ProcessedSent": "n religious leader institution voice moderate religious leader amplified coordinated educator foster coordination promote message peace tolerance", "SentID": 6605 }, { "ParagraphID": 1995, - "Paragraph": "In many cases, partnerships with other stakeholders are required to support the design, planning and implementation of the PI\/SC strategy. The following partners are often the secondary audience of a DDR process; however, depending on the context, they may also be the primary audience (e.g., the international community in a regionalized armed conflict): \\n Civil society: This includes women\u2019s groups, youth groups, local associations and non- governmental organizations that play a role in the DDR process, including those working as implementing partners of national and international governmental institutions. \\n Religious leaders and institutions: The voices of moderate religious leaders can be amplified and coordinated with educators to foster coordination and promote messages of peace and tolerance. \\n Legislative and policy-setting authorities: The legal framework in the country regulating the media can be reviewed and laws put in place to prevent the distribution of messages inciting hate or spreading misinformation. If this approach is used, care must be taken to ensure that civil and political rights are not affected. \\n International and local media: International and local media are often the main source of information on progress in the peace process. Keeping both media segments supplied with accurate and up-to-date information on the planning and implementation of DDR is important in order to increase support for the process and avoid bad press. The media are also key whistleblowers that can identify, expose and denounce potential spoilers of the peace process. \\n Private sector: Companies in the private sector can also be important amplifiers and partners, for example, by generating specific recruitment advertisements in support of reintegration opportunities. Local telecommunication companies and internet service providers can also offer avenues to further disseminate key messages. \\n Opinion leaders\/influencers: In many contexts, opinion leaders are public personalities who actively produce and interpret multiple sources of information to form an opinion. With the advent of social media, these actors generate viewership and large followings through regular programming and online presence. \\n Regional stakeholders: These include Governments, regional organizations, military and political parties of neighbouring countries, civil society in neighboring States, businesses and potential spoilers. \\n The international community: This includes donors, their constituencies (including, if applicable, the diaspora who can influence the direction of DDR), troop-contributing countries, the UN system, international financial institutions, non-governmental organizations and think tanks.", + "Paragraph": "In many cases, partnerships with other stakeholders are required to support the design, planning and implementation of the PI\/SC strategy. The following partners are often the secondary audience of a DDR process; however, depending on the context, they may also be the primary audience (e.g., the international community in a regionalized armed conflict): \n Civil society: This includes women\u2019s groups, youth groups, local associations and non- governmental organizations that play a role in the DDR process, including those working as implementing partners of national and international governmental institutions. \n Religious leaders and institutions: The voices of moderate religious leaders can be amplified and coordinated with educators to foster coordination and promote messages of peace and tolerance. \n Legislative and policy-setting authorities: The legal framework in the country regulating the media can be reviewed and laws put in place to prevent the distribution of messages inciting hate or spreading misinformation. If this approach is used, care must be taken to ensure that civil and political rights are not affected. \n International and local media: International and local media are often the main source of information on progress in the peace process. Keeping both media segments supplied with accurate and up-to-date information on the planning and implementation of DDR is important in order to increase support for the process and avoid bad press. The media are also key whistleblowers that can identify, expose and denounce potential spoilers of the peace process. \n Private sector: Companies in the private sector can also be important amplifiers and partners, for example, by generating specific recruitment advertisements in support of reintegration opportunities. Local telecommunication companies and internet service providers can also offer avenues to further disseminate key messages. \n Opinion leaders\/influencers: In many contexts, opinion leaders are public personalities who actively produce and interpret multiple sources of information to form an opinion. With the advent of social media, these actors generate viewership and large followings through regular programming and online presence. \n Regional stakeholders: These include Governments, regional organizations, military and political parties of neighbouring countries, civil society in neighboring States, businesses and potential spoilers. \n The international community: This includes donors, their constituencies (including, if applicable, the diaspora who can influence the direction of DDR), troop-contributing countries, the UN system, international financial institutions, non-governmental organizations and think tanks.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118920,14 +118920,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Secondary audience (partners)", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Legislative and policy-setting authorities: The legal framework in the country regulating the media can be reviewed and laws put in place to prevent the distribution of messages inciting hate or spreading misinformation.", + "Sentence": "\n Legislative and policy-setting authorities: The legal framework in the country regulating the media can be reviewed and laws put in place to prevent the distribution of messages inciting hate or spreading misinformation.", "newParagraph": "many case partnership stakeholder required support design planning implementation pisc strategy following partner often secondary audience ddr process however depending context may also primary audience eg international community regionalized armed conflict n civil society includes woman group youth group local association non governmental organization play role ddr process including working implementing partner national international governmental institution n religious leader institution voice moderate religious leader amplified coordinated educator foster coordination promote message peace tolerance n legislative policysetting authority legal framework country regulating medium reviewed law put place prevent distribution message inciting hate spreading misinformation approach used care must taken ensure civil political right affected n international local medium international local medium often main source information progress peace process keeping medium segment supplied accurate uptodate information planning implementation ddr important order increase support process avoid bad press medium also key whistleblower identify expose denounce potential spoiler peace process n private sector company private sector also important amplifier partner example generating specific recruitment advertisement support reintegration opportunity local telecommunication company internet service provider also offer avenue disseminate key message n opinion leadersinfluencers many context opinion leader public personality actively produce interpret multiple source information form opinion advent social medium actor generate viewership large following regular programming online presence n regional stakeholder include government regional organization military political party neighbouring country civil society neighboring state business potential spoiler n international community includes donor constituency including applicable diaspora influence direction ddr troopcontributing country un system international financial institution nongovernmental organization think tank", "ProcessedSent": "n legislative policysetting authority legal framework country regulating medium reviewed law put place prevent distribution message inciting hate spreading misinformation", "SentID": 6606 }, { "ParagraphID": 1995, - "Paragraph": "In many cases, partnerships with other stakeholders are required to support the design, planning and implementation of the PI\/SC strategy. The following partners are often the secondary audience of a DDR process; however, depending on the context, they may also be the primary audience (e.g., the international community in a regionalized armed conflict): \\n Civil society: This includes women\u2019s groups, youth groups, local associations and non- governmental organizations that play a role in the DDR process, including those working as implementing partners of national and international governmental institutions. \\n Religious leaders and institutions: The voices of moderate religious leaders can be amplified and coordinated with educators to foster coordination and promote messages of peace and tolerance. \\n Legislative and policy-setting authorities: The legal framework in the country regulating the media can be reviewed and laws put in place to prevent the distribution of messages inciting hate or spreading misinformation. If this approach is used, care must be taken to ensure that civil and political rights are not affected. \\n International and local media: International and local media are often the main source of information on progress in the peace process. Keeping both media segments supplied with accurate and up-to-date information on the planning and implementation of DDR is important in order to increase support for the process and avoid bad press. The media are also key whistleblowers that can identify, expose and denounce potential spoilers of the peace process. \\n Private sector: Companies in the private sector can also be important amplifiers and partners, for example, by generating specific recruitment advertisements in support of reintegration opportunities. Local telecommunication companies and internet service providers can also offer avenues to further disseminate key messages. \\n Opinion leaders\/influencers: In many contexts, opinion leaders are public personalities who actively produce and interpret multiple sources of information to form an opinion. With the advent of social media, these actors generate viewership and large followings through regular programming and online presence. \\n Regional stakeholders: These include Governments, regional organizations, military and political parties of neighbouring countries, civil society in neighboring States, businesses and potential spoilers. \\n The international community: This includes donors, their constituencies (including, if applicable, the diaspora who can influence the direction of DDR), troop-contributing countries, the UN system, international financial institutions, non-governmental organizations and think tanks.", + "Paragraph": "In many cases, partnerships with other stakeholders are required to support the design, planning and implementation of the PI\/SC strategy. The following partners are often the secondary audience of a DDR process; however, depending on the context, they may also be the primary audience (e.g., the international community in a regionalized armed conflict): \n Civil society: This includes women\u2019s groups, youth groups, local associations and non- governmental organizations that play a role in the DDR process, including those working as implementing partners of national and international governmental institutions. \n Religious leaders and institutions: The voices of moderate religious leaders can be amplified and coordinated with educators to foster coordination and promote messages of peace and tolerance. \n Legislative and policy-setting authorities: The legal framework in the country regulating the media can be reviewed and laws put in place to prevent the distribution of messages inciting hate or spreading misinformation. If this approach is used, care must be taken to ensure that civil and political rights are not affected. \n International and local media: International and local media are often the main source of information on progress in the peace process. Keeping both media segments supplied with accurate and up-to-date information on the planning and implementation of DDR is important in order to increase support for the process and avoid bad press. The media are also key whistleblowers that can identify, expose and denounce potential spoilers of the peace process. \n Private sector: Companies in the private sector can also be important amplifiers and partners, for example, by generating specific recruitment advertisements in support of reintegration opportunities. Local telecommunication companies and internet service providers can also offer avenues to further disseminate key messages. \n Opinion leaders\/influencers: In many contexts, opinion leaders are public personalities who actively produce and interpret multiple sources of information to form an opinion. With the advent of social media, these actors generate viewership and large followings through regular programming and online presence. \n Regional stakeholders: These include Governments, regional organizations, military and political parties of neighbouring countries, civil society in neighboring States, businesses and potential spoilers. \n The international community: This includes donors, their constituencies (including, if applicable, the diaspora who can influence the direction of DDR), troop-contributing countries, the UN system, international financial institutions, non-governmental organizations and think tanks.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118945,7 +118945,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1995, - "Paragraph": "In many cases, partnerships with other stakeholders are required to support the design, planning and implementation of the PI\/SC strategy. The following partners are often the secondary audience of a DDR process; however, depending on the context, they may also be the primary audience (e.g., the international community in a regionalized armed conflict): \\n Civil society: This includes women\u2019s groups, youth groups, local associations and non- governmental organizations that play a role in the DDR process, including those working as implementing partners of national and international governmental institutions. \\n Religious leaders and institutions: The voices of moderate religious leaders can be amplified and coordinated with educators to foster coordination and promote messages of peace and tolerance. \\n Legislative and policy-setting authorities: The legal framework in the country regulating the media can be reviewed and laws put in place to prevent the distribution of messages inciting hate or spreading misinformation. If this approach is used, care must be taken to ensure that civil and political rights are not affected. \\n International and local media: International and local media are often the main source of information on progress in the peace process. Keeping both media segments supplied with accurate and up-to-date information on the planning and implementation of DDR is important in order to increase support for the process and avoid bad press. The media are also key whistleblowers that can identify, expose and denounce potential spoilers of the peace process. \\n Private sector: Companies in the private sector can also be important amplifiers and partners, for example, by generating specific recruitment advertisements in support of reintegration opportunities. Local telecommunication companies and internet service providers can also offer avenues to further disseminate key messages. \\n Opinion leaders\/influencers: In many contexts, opinion leaders are public personalities who actively produce and interpret multiple sources of information to form an opinion. With the advent of social media, these actors generate viewership and large followings through regular programming and online presence. \\n Regional stakeholders: These include Governments, regional organizations, military and political parties of neighbouring countries, civil society in neighboring States, businesses and potential spoilers. \\n The international community: This includes donors, their constituencies (including, if applicable, the diaspora who can influence the direction of DDR), troop-contributing countries, the UN system, international financial institutions, non-governmental organizations and think tanks.", + "Paragraph": "In many cases, partnerships with other stakeholders are required to support the design, planning and implementation of the PI\/SC strategy. The following partners are often the secondary audience of a DDR process; however, depending on the context, they may also be the primary audience (e.g., the international community in a regionalized armed conflict): \n Civil society: This includes women\u2019s groups, youth groups, local associations and non- governmental organizations that play a role in the DDR process, including those working as implementing partners of national and international governmental institutions. \n Religious leaders and institutions: The voices of moderate religious leaders can be amplified and coordinated with educators to foster coordination and promote messages of peace and tolerance. \n Legislative and policy-setting authorities: The legal framework in the country regulating the media can be reviewed and laws put in place to prevent the distribution of messages inciting hate or spreading misinformation. If this approach is used, care must be taken to ensure that civil and political rights are not affected. \n International and local media: International and local media are often the main source of information on progress in the peace process. Keeping both media segments supplied with accurate and up-to-date information on the planning and implementation of DDR is important in order to increase support for the process and avoid bad press. The media are also key whistleblowers that can identify, expose and denounce potential spoilers of the peace process. \n Private sector: Companies in the private sector can also be important amplifiers and partners, for example, by generating specific recruitment advertisements in support of reintegration opportunities. Local telecommunication companies and internet service providers can also offer avenues to further disseminate key messages. \n Opinion leaders\/influencers: In many contexts, opinion leaders are public personalities who actively produce and interpret multiple sources of information to form an opinion. With the advent of social media, these actors generate viewership and large followings through regular programming and online presence. \n Regional stakeholders: These include Governments, regional organizations, military and political parties of neighbouring countries, civil society in neighboring States, businesses and potential spoilers. \n The international community: This includes donors, their constituencies (including, if applicable, the diaspora who can influence the direction of DDR), troop-contributing countries, the UN system, international financial institutions, non-governmental organizations and think tanks.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118956,14 +118956,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Secondary audience (partners)", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n International and local media: International and local media are often the main source of information on progress in the peace process.", + "Sentence": "\n International and local media: International and local media are often the main source of information on progress in the peace process.", "newParagraph": "many case partnership stakeholder required support design planning implementation pisc strategy following partner often secondary audience ddr process however depending context may also primary audience eg international community regionalized armed conflict n civil society includes woman group youth group local association non governmental organization play role ddr process including working implementing partner national international governmental institution n religious leader institution voice moderate religious leader amplified coordinated educator foster coordination promote message peace tolerance n legislative policysetting authority legal framework country regulating medium reviewed law put place prevent distribution message inciting hate spreading misinformation approach used care must taken ensure civil political right affected n international local medium international local medium often main source information progress peace process keeping medium segment supplied accurate uptodate information planning implementation ddr important order increase support process avoid bad press medium also key whistleblower identify expose denounce potential spoiler peace process n private sector company private sector also important amplifier partner example generating specific recruitment advertisement support reintegration opportunity local telecommunication company internet service provider also offer avenue disseminate key message n opinion leadersinfluencers many context opinion leader public personality actively produce interpret multiple source information form opinion advent social medium actor generate viewership large following regular programming online presence n regional stakeholder include government regional organization military political party neighbouring country civil society neighboring state business potential spoiler n international community includes donor constituency including applicable diaspora influence direction ddr troopcontributing country un system international financial institution nongovernmental organization think tank", "ProcessedSent": "n international local medium international local medium often main source information progress peace process", "SentID": 6608 }, { "ParagraphID": 1995, - "Paragraph": "In many cases, partnerships with other stakeholders are required to support the design, planning and implementation of the PI\/SC strategy. The following partners are often the secondary audience of a DDR process; however, depending on the context, they may also be the primary audience (e.g., the international community in a regionalized armed conflict): \\n Civil society: This includes women\u2019s groups, youth groups, local associations and non- governmental organizations that play a role in the DDR process, including those working as implementing partners of national and international governmental institutions. \\n Religious leaders and institutions: The voices of moderate religious leaders can be amplified and coordinated with educators to foster coordination and promote messages of peace and tolerance. \\n Legislative and policy-setting authorities: The legal framework in the country regulating the media can be reviewed and laws put in place to prevent the distribution of messages inciting hate or spreading misinformation. If this approach is used, care must be taken to ensure that civil and political rights are not affected. \\n International and local media: International and local media are often the main source of information on progress in the peace process. Keeping both media segments supplied with accurate and up-to-date information on the planning and implementation of DDR is important in order to increase support for the process and avoid bad press. The media are also key whistleblowers that can identify, expose and denounce potential spoilers of the peace process. \\n Private sector: Companies in the private sector can also be important amplifiers and partners, for example, by generating specific recruitment advertisements in support of reintegration opportunities. Local telecommunication companies and internet service providers can also offer avenues to further disseminate key messages. \\n Opinion leaders\/influencers: In many contexts, opinion leaders are public personalities who actively produce and interpret multiple sources of information to form an opinion. With the advent of social media, these actors generate viewership and large followings through regular programming and online presence. \\n Regional stakeholders: These include Governments, regional organizations, military and political parties of neighbouring countries, civil society in neighboring States, businesses and potential spoilers. \\n The international community: This includes donors, their constituencies (including, if applicable, the diaspora who can influence the direction of DDR), troop-contributing countries, the UN system, international financial institutions, non-governmental organizations and think tanks.", + "Paragraph": "In many cases, partnerships with other stakeholders are required to support the design, planning and implementation of the PI\/SC strategy. The following partners are often the secondary audience of a DDR process; however, depending on the context, they may also be the primary audience (e.g., the international community in a regionalized armed conflict): \n Civil society: This includes women\u2019s groups, youth groups, local associations and non- governmental organizations that play a role in the DDR process, including those working as implementing partners of national and international governmental institutions. \n Religious leaders and institutions: The voices of moderate religious leaders can be amplified and coordinated with educators to foster coordination and promote messages of peace and tolerance. \n Legislative and policy-setting authorities: The legal framework in the country regulating the media can be reviewed and laws put in place to prevent the distribution of messages inciting hate or spreading misinformation. If this approach is used, care must be taken to ensure that civil and political rights are not affected. \n International and local media: International and local media are often the main source of information on progress in the peace process. Keeping both media segments supplied with accurate and up-to-date information on the planning and implementation of DDR is important in order to increase support for the process and avoid bad press. The media are also key whistleblowers that can identify, expose and denounce potential spoilers of the peace process. \n Private sector: Companies in the private sector can also be important amplifiers and partners, for example, by generating specific recruitment advertisements in support of reintegration opportunities. Local telecommunication companies and internet service providers can also offer avenues to further disseminate key messages. \n Opinion leaders\/influencers: In many contexts, opinion leaders are public personalities who actively produce and interpret multiple sources of information to form an opinion. With the advent of social media, these actors generate viewership and large followings through regular programming and online presence. \n Regional stakeholders: These include Governments, regional organizations, military and political parties of neighbouring countries, civil society in neighboring States, businesses and potential spoilers. \n The international community: This includes donors, their constituencies (including, if applicable, the diaspora who can influence the direction of DDR), troop-contributing countries, the UN system, international financial institutions, non-governmental organizations and think tanks.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118981,7 +118981,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1995, - "Paragraph": "In many cases, partnerships with other stakeholders are required to support the design, planning and implementation of the PI\/SC strategy. The following partners are often the secondary audience of a DDR process; however, depending on the context, they may also be the primary audience (e.g., the international community in a regionalized armed conflict): \\n Civil society: This includes women\u2019s groups, youth groups, local associations and non- governmental organizations that play a role in the DDR process, including those working as implementing partners of national and international governmental institutions. \\n Religious leaders and institutions: The voices of moderate religious leaders can be amplified and coordinated with educators to foster coordination and promote messages of peace and tolerance. \\n Legislative and policy-setting authorities: The legal framework in the country regulating the media can be reviewed and laws put in place to prevent the distribution of messages inciting hate or spreading misinformation. If this approach is used, care must be taken to ensure that civil and political rights are not affected. \\n International and local media: International and local media are often the main source of information on progress in the peace process. Keeping both media segments supplied with accurate and up-to-date information on the planning and implementation of DDR is important in order to increase support for the process and avoid bad press. The media are also key whistleblowers that can identify, expose and denounce potential spoilers of the peace process. \\n Private sector: Companies in the private sector can also be important amplifiers and partners, for example, by generating specific recruitment advertisements in support of reintegration opportunities. Local telecommunication companies and internet service providers can also offer avenues to further disseminate key messages. \\n Opinion leaders\/influencers: In many contexts, opinion leaders are public personalities who actively produce and interpret multiple sources of information to form an opinion. With the advent of social media, these actors generate viewership and large followings through regular programming and online presence. \\n Regional stakeholders: These include Governments, regional organizations, military and political parties of neighbouring countries, civil society in neighboring States, businesses and potential spoilers. \\n The international community: This includes donors, their constituencies (including, if applicable, the diaspora who can influence the direction of DDR), troop-contributing countries, the UN system, international financial institutions, non-governmental organizations and think tanks.", + "Paragraph": "In many cases, partnerships with other stakeholders are required to support the design, planning and implementation of the PI\/SC strategy. The following partners are often the secondary audience of a DDR process; however, depending on the context, they may also be the primary audience (e.g., the international community in a regionalized armed conflict): \n Civil society: This includes women\u2019s groups, youth groups, local associations and non- governmental organizations that play a role in the DDR process, including those working as implementing partners of national and international governmental institutions. \n Religious leaders and institutions: The voices of moderate religious leaders can be amplified and coordinated with educators to foster coordination and promote messages of peace and tolerance. \n Legislative and policy-setting authorities: The legal framework in the country regulating the media can be reviewed and laws put in place to prevent the distribution of messages inciting hate or spreading misinformation. If this approach is used, care must be taken to ensure that civil and political rights are not affected. \n International and local media: International and local media are often the main source of information on progress in the peace process. Keeping both media segments supplied with accurate and up-to-date information on the planning and implementation of DDR is important in order to increase support for the process and avoid bad press. The media are also key whistleblowers that can identify, expose and denounce potential spoilers of the peace process. \n Private sector: Companies in the private sector can also be important amplifiers and partners, for example, by generating specific recruitment advertisements in support of reintegration opportunities. Local telecommunication companies and internet service providers can also offer avenues to further disseminate key messages. \n Opinion leaders\/influencers: In many contexts, opinion leaders are public personalities who actively produce and interpret multiple sources of information to form an opinion. With the advent of social media, these actors generate viewership and large followings through regular programming and online presence. \n Regional stakeholders: These include Governments, regional organizations, military and political parties of neighbouring countries, civil society in neighboring States, businesses and potential spoilers. \n The international community: This includes donors, their constituencies (including, if applicable, the diaspora who can influence the direction of DDR), troop-contributing countries, the UN system, international financial institutions, non-governmental organizations and think tanks.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -118999,7 +118999,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1995, - "Paragraph": "In many cases, partnerships with other stakeholders are required to support the design, planning and implementation of the PI\/SC strategy. The following partners are often the secondary audience of a DDR process; however, depending on the context, they may also be the primary audience (e.g., the international community in a regionalized armed conflict): \\n Civil society: This includes women\u2019s groups, youth groups, local associations and non- governmental organizations that play a role in the DDR process, including those working as implementing partners of national and international governmental institutions. \\n Religious leaders and institutions: The voices of moderate religious leaders can be amplified and coordinated with educators to foster coordination and promote messages of peace and tolerance. \\n Legislative and policy-setting authorities: The legal framework in the country regulating the media can be reviewed and laws put in place to prevent the distribution of messages inciting hate or spreading misinformation. If this approach is used, care must be taken to ensure that civil and political rights are not affected. \\n International and local media: International and local media are often the main source of information on progress in the peace process. Keeping both media segments supplied with accurate and up-to-date information on the planning and implementation of DDR is important in order to increase support for the process and avoid bad press. The media are also key whistleblowers that can identify, expose and denounce potential spoilers of the peace process. \\n Private sector: Companies in the private sector can also be important amplifiers and partners, for example, by generating specific recruitment advertisements in support of reintegration opportunities. Local telecommunication companies and internet service providers can also offer avenues to further disseminate key messages. \\n Opinion leaders\/influencers: In many contexts, opinion leaders are public personalities who actively produce and interpret multiple sources of information to form an opinion. With the advent of social media, these actors generate viewership and large followings through regular programming and online presence. \\n Regional stakeholders: These include Governments, regional organizations, military and political parties of neighbouring countries, civil society in neighboring States, businesses and potential spoilers. \\n The international community: This includes donors, their constituencies (including, if applicable, the diaspora who can influence the direction of DDR), troop-contributing countries, the UN system, international financial institutions, non-governmental organizations and think tanks.", + "Paragraph": "In many cases, partnerships with other stakeholders are required to support the design, planning and implementation of the PI\/SC strategy. The following partners are often the secondary audience of a DDR process; however, depending on the context, they may also be the primary audience (e.g., the international community in a regionalized armed conflict): \n Civil society: This includes women\u2019s groups, youth groups, local associations and non- governmental organizations that play a role in the DDR process, including those working as implementing partners of national and international governmental institutions. \n Religious leaders and institutions: The voices of moderate religious leaders can be amplified and coordinated with educators to foster coordination and promote messages of peace and tolerance. \n Legislative and policy-setting authorities: The legal framework in the country regulating the media can be reviewed and laws put in place to prevent the distribution of messages inciting hate or spreading misinformation. If this approach is used, care must be taken to ensure that civil and political rights are not affected. \n International and local media: International and local media are often the main source of information on progress in the peace process. Keeping both media segments supplied with accurate and up-to-date information on the planning and implementation of DDR is important in order to increase support for the process and avoid bad press. The media are also key whistleblowers that can identify, expose and denounce potential spoilers of the peace process. \n Private sector: Companies in the private sector can also be important amplifiers and partners, for example, by generating specific recruitment advertisements in support of reintegration opportunities. Local telecommunication companies and internet service providers can also offer avenues to further disseminate key messages. \n Opinion leaders\/influencers: In many contexts, opinion leaders are public personalities who actively produce and interpret multiple sources of information to form an opinion. With the advent of social media, these actors generate viewership and large followings through regular programming and online presence. \n Regional stakeholders: These include Governments, regional organizations, military and political parties of neighbouring countries, civil society in neighboring States, businesses and potential spoilers. \n The international community: This includes donors, their constituencies (including, if applicable, the diaspora who can influence the direction of DDR), troop-contributing countries, the UN system, international financial institutions, non-governmental organizations and think tanks.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -119010,14 +119010,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Secondary audience (partners)", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Private sector: Companies in the private sector can also be important amplifiers and partners, for example, by generating specific recruitment advertisements in support of reintegration opportunities.", + "Sentence": "\n Private sector: Companies in the private sector can also be important amplifiers and partners, for example, by generating specific recruitment advertisements in support of reintegration opportunities.", "newParagraph": "many case partnership stakeholder required support design planning implementation pisc strategy following partner often secondary audience ddr process however depending context may also primary audience eg international community regionalized armed conflict n civil society includes woman group youth group local association non governmental organization play role ddr process including working implementing partner national international governmental institution n religious leader institution voice moderate religious leader amplified coordinated educator foster coordination promote message peace tolerance n legislative policysetting authority legal framework country regulating medium reviewed law put place prevent distribution message inciting hate spreading misinformation approach used care must taken ensure civil political right affected n international local medium international local medium often main source information progress peace process keeping medium segment supplied accurate uptodate information planning implementation ddr important order increase support process avoid bad press medium also key whistleblower identify expose denounce potential spoiler peace process n private sector company private sector also important amplifier partner example generating specific recruitment advertisement support reintegration opportunity local telecommunication company internet service provider also offer avenue disseminate key message n opinion leadersinfluencers many context opinion leader public personality actively produce interpret multiple source information form opinion advent social medium actor generate viewership large following regular programming online presence n regional stakeholder include government regional organization military political party neighbouring country civil society neighboring state business potential spoiler n international community includes donor constituency including applicable diaspora influence direction ddr troopcontributing country un system international financial institution nongovernmental organization think tank", "ProcessedSent": "n private sector company private sector also important amplifier partner example generating specific recruitment advertisement support reintegration opportunity", "SentID": 6611 }, { "ParagraphID": 1995, - "Paragraph": "In many cases, partnerships with other stakeholders are required to support the design, planning and implementation of the PI\/SC strategy. The following partners are often the secondary audience of a DDR process; however, depending on the context, they may also be the primary audience (e.g., the international community in a regionalized armed conflict): \\n Civil society: This includes women\u2019s groups, youth groups, local associations and non- governmental organizations that play a role in the DDR process, including those working as implementing partners of national and international governmental institutions. \\n Religious leaders and institutions: The voices of moderate religious leaders can be amplified and coordinated with educators to foster coordination and promote messages of peace and tolerance. \\n Legislative and policy-setting authorities: The legal framework in the country regulating the media can be reviewed and laws put in place to prevent the distribution of messages inciting hate or spreading misinformation. If this approach is used, care must be taken to ensure that civil and political rights are not affected. \\n International and local media: International and local media are often the main source of information on progress in the peace process. Keeping both media segments supplied with accurate and up-to-date information on the planning and implementation of DDR is important in order to increase support for the process and avoid bad press. The media are also key whistleblowers that can identify, expose and denounce potential spoilers of the peace process. \\n Private sector: Companies in the private sector can also be important amplifiers and partners, for example, by generating specific recruitment advertisements in support of reintegration opportunities. Local telecommunication companies and internet service providers can also offer avenues to further disseminate key messages. \\n Opinion leaders\/influencers: In many contexts, opinion leaders are public personalities who actively produce and interpret multiple sources of information to form an opinion. With the advent of social media, these actors generate viewership and large followings through regular programming and online presence. \\n Regional stakeholders: These include Governments, regional organizations, military and political parties of neighbouring countries, civil society in neighboring States, businesses and potential spoilers. \\n The international community: This includes donors, their constituencies (including, if applicable, the diaspora who can influence the direction of DDR), troop-contributing countries, the UN system, international financial institutions, non-governmental organizations and think tanks.", + "Paragraph": "In many cases, partnerships with other stakeholders are required to support the design, planning and implementation of the PI\/SC strategy. The following partners are often the secondary audience of a DDR process; however, depending on the context, they may also be the primary audience (e.g., the international community in a regionalized armed conflict): \n Civil society: This includes women\u2019s groups, youth groups, local associations and non- governmental organizations that play a role in the DDR process, including those working as implementing partners of national and international governmental institutions. \n Religious leaders and institutions: The voices of moderate religious leaders can be amplified and coordinated with educators to foster coordination and promote messages of peace and tolerance. \n Legislative and policy-setting authorities: The legal framework in the country regulating the media can be reviewed and laws put in place to prevent the distribution of messages inciting hate or spreading misinformation. If this approach is used, care must be taken to ensure that civil and political rights are not affected. \n International and local media: International and local media are often the main source of information on progress in the peace process. Keeping both media segments supplied with accurate and up-to-date information on the planning and implementation of DDR is important in order to increase support for the process and avoid bad press. The media are also key whistleblowers that can identify, expose and denounce potential spoilers of the peace process. \n Private sector: Companies in the private sector can also be important amplifiers and partners, for example, by generating specific recruitment advertisements in support of reintegration opportunities. Local telecommunication companies and internet service providers can also offer avenues to further disseminate key messages. \n Opinion leaders\/influencers: In many contexts, opinion leaders are public personalities who actively produce and interpret multiple sources of information to form an opinion. With the advent of social media, these actors generate viewership and large followings through regular programming and online presence. \n Regional stakeholders: These include Governments, regional organizations, military and political parties of neighbouring countries, civil society in neighboring States, businesses and potential spoilers. \n The international community: This includes donors, their constituencies (including, if applicable, the diaspora who can influence the direction of DDR), troop-contributing countries, the UN system, international financial institutions, non-governmental organizations and think tanks.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -119035,7 +119035,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1995, - "Paragraph": "In many cases, partnerships with other stakeholders are required to support the design, planning and implementation of the PI\/SC strategy. The following partners are often the secondary audience of a DDR process; however, depending on the context, they may also be the primary audience (e.g., the international community in a regionalized armed conflict): \\n Civil society: This includes women\u2019s groups, youth groups, local associations and non- governmental organizations that play a role in the DDR process, including those working as implementing partners of national and international governmental institutions. \\n Religious leaders and institutions: The voices of moderate religious leaders can be amplified and coordinated with educators to foster coordination and promote messages of peace and tolerance. \\n Legislative and policy-setting authorities: The legal framework in the country regulating the media can be reviewed and laws put in place to prevent the distribution of messages inciting hate or spreading misinformation. If this approach is used, care must be taken to ensure that civil and political rights are not affected. \\n International and local media: International and local media are often the main source of information on progress in the peace process. Keeping both media segments supplied with accurate and up-to-date information on the planning and implementation of DDR is important in order to increase support for the process and avoid bad press. The media are also key whistleblowers that can identify, expose and denounce potential spoilers of the peace process. \\n Private sector: Companies in the private sector can also be important amplifiers and partners, for example, by generating specific recruitment advertisements in support of reintegration opportunities. Local telecommunication companies and internet service providers can also offer avenues to further disseminate key messages. \\n Opinion leaders\/influencers: In many contexts, opinion leaders are public personalities who actively produce and interpret multiple sources of information to form an opinion. With the advent of social media, these actors generate viewership and large followings through regular programming and online presence. \\n Regional stakeholders: These include Governments, regional organizations, military and political parties of neighbouring countries, civil society in neighboring States, businesses and potential spoilers. \\n The international community: This includes donors, their constituencies (including, if applicable, the diaspora who can influence the direction of DDR), troop-contributing countries, the UN system, international financial institutions, non-governmental organizations and think tanks.", + "Paragraph": "In many cases, partnerships with other stakeholders are required to support the design, planning and implementation of the PI\/SC strategy. The following partners are often the secondary audience of a DDR process; however, depending on the context, they may also be the primary audience (e.g., the international community in a regionalized armed conflict): \n Civil society: This includes women\u2019s groups, youth groups, local associations and non- governmental organizations that play a role in the DDR process, including those working as implementing partners of national and international governmental institutions. \n Religious leaders and institutions: The voices of moderate religious leaders can be amplified and coordinated with educators to foster coordination and promote messages of peace and tolerance. \n Legislative and policy-setting authorities: The legal framework in the country regulating the media can be reviewed and laws put in place to prevent the distribution of messages inciting hate or spreading misinformation. If this approach is used, care must be taken to ensure that civil and political rights are not affected. \n International and local media: International and local media are often the main source of information on progress in the peace process. Keeping both media segments supplied with accurate and up-to-date information on the planning and implementation of DDR is important in order to increase support for the process and avoid bad press. The media are also key whistleblowers that can identify, expose and denounce potential spoilers of the peace process. \n Private sector: Companies in the private sector can also be important amplifiers and partners, for example, by generating specific recruitment advertisements in support of reintegration opportunities. Local telecommunication companies and internet service providers can also offer avenues to further disseminate key messages. \n Opinion leaders\/influencers: In many contexts, opinion leaders are public personalities who actively produce and interpret multiple sources of information to form an opinion. With the advent of social media, these actors generate viewership and large followings through regular programming and online presence. \n Regional stakeholders: These include Governments, regional organizations, military and political parties of neighbouring countries, civil society in neighboring States, businesses and potential spoilers. \n The international community: This includes donors, their constituencies (including, if applicable, the diaspora who can influence the direction of DDR), troop-contributing countries, the UN system, international financial institutions, non-governmental organizations and think tanks.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -119046,14 +119046,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Secondary audience (partners)", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Opinion leaders\/influencers: In many contexts, opinion leaders are public personalities who actively produce and interpret multiple sources of information to form an opinion.", + "Sentence": "\n Opinion leaders\/influencers: In many contexts, opinion leaders are public personalities who actively produce and interpret multiple sources of information to form an opinion.", "newParagraph": "many case partnership stakeholder required support design planning implementation pisc strategy following partner often secondary audience ddr process however depending context may also primary audience eg international community regionalized armed conflict n civil society includes woman group youth group local association non governmental organization play role ddr process including working implementing partner national international governmental institution n religious leader institution voice moderate religious leader amplified coordinated educator foster coordination promote message peace tolerance n legislative policysetting authority legal framework country regulating medium reviewed law put place prevent distribution message inciting hate spreading misinformation approach used care must taken ensure civil political right affected n international local medium international local medium often main source information progress peace process keeping medium segment supplied accurate uptodate information planning implementation ddr important order increase support process avoid bad press medium also key whistleblower identify expose denounce potential spoiler peace process n private sector company private sector also important amplifier partner example generating specific recruitment advertisement support reintegration opportunity local telecommunication company internet service provider also offer avenue disseminate key message n opinion leadersinfluencers many context opinion leader public personality actively produce interpret multiple source information form opinion advent social medium actor generate viewership large following regular programming online presence n regional stakeholder include government regional organization military political party neighbouring country civil society neighboring state business potential spoiler n international community includes donor constituency including applicable diaspora influence direction ddr troopcontributing country un system international financial institution nongovernmental organization think tank", "ProcessedSent": "n opinion leadersinfluencers many context opinion leader public personality actively produce interpret multiple source information form opinion", "SentID": 6613 }, { "ParagraphID": 1995, - "Paragraph": "In many cases, partnerships with other stakeholders are required to support the design, planning and implementation of the PI\/SC strategy. The following partners are often the secondary audience of a DDR process; however, depending on the context, they may also be the primary audience (e.g., the international community in a regionalized armed conflict): \\n Civil society: This includes women\u2019s groups, youth groups, local associations and non- governmental organizations that play a role in the DDR process, including those working as implementing partners of national and international governmental institutions. \\n Religious leaders and institutions: The voices of moderate religious leaders can be amplified and coordinated with educators to foster coordination and promote messages of peace and tolerance. \\n Legislative and policy-setting authorities: The legal framework in the country regulating the media can be reviewed and laws put in place to prevent the distribution of messages inciting hate or spreading misinformation. If this approach is used, care must be taken to ensure that civil and political rights are not affected. \\n International and local media: International and local media are often the main source of information on progress in the peace process. Keeping both media segments supplied with accurate and up-to-date information on the planning and implementation of DDR is important in order to increase support for the process and avoid bad press. The media are also key whistleblowers that can identify, expose and denounce potential spoilers of the peace process. \\n Private sector: Companies in the private sector can also be important amplifiers and partners, for example, by generating specific recruitment advertisements in support of reintegration opportunities. Local telecommunication companies and internet service providers can also offer avenues to further disseminate key messages. \\n Opinion leaders\/influencers: In many contexts, opinion leaders are public personalities who actively produce and interpret multiple sources of information to form an opinion. With the advent of social media, these actors generate viewership and large followings through regular programming and online presence. \\n Regional stakeholders: These include Governments, regional organizations, military and political parties of neighbouring countries, civil society in neighboring States, businesses and potential spoilers. \\n The international community: This includes donors, their constituencies (including, if applicable, the diaspora who can influence the direction of DDR), troop-contributing countries, the UN system, international financial institutions, non-governmental organizations and think tanks.", + "Paragraph": "In many cases, partnerships with other stakeholders are required to support the design, planning and implementation of the PI\/SC strategy. The following partners are often the secondary audience of a DDR process; however, depending on the context, they may also be the primary audience (e.g., the international community in a regionalized armed conflict): \n Civil society: This includes women\u2019s groups, youth groups, local associations and non- governmental organizations that play a role in the DDR process, including those working as implementing partners of national and international governmental institutions. \n Religious leaders and institutions: The voices of moderate religious leaders can be amplified and coordinated with educators to foster coordination and promote messages of peace and tolerance. \n Legislative and policy-setting authorities: The legal framework in the country regulating the media can be reviewed and laws put in place to prevent the distribution of messages inciting hate or spreading misinformation. If this approach is used, care must be taken to ensure that civil and political rights are not affected. \n International and local media: International and local media are often the main source of information on progress in the peace process. Keeping both media segments supplied with accurate and up-to-date information on the planning and implementation of DDR is important in order to increase support for the process and avoid bad press. The media are also key whistleblowers that can identify, expose and denounce potential spoilers of the peace process. \n Private sector: Companies in the private sector can also be important amplifiers and partners, for example, by generating specific recruitment advertisements in support of reintegration opportunities. Local telecommunication companies and internet service providers can also offer avenues to further disseminate key messages. \n Opinion leaders\/influencers: In many contexts, opinion leaders are public personalities who actively produce and interpret multiple sources of information to form an opinion. With the advent of social media, these actors generate viewership and large followings through regular programming and online presence. \n Regional stakeholders: These include Governments, regional organizations, military and political parties of neighbouring countries, civil society in neighboring States, businesses and potential spoilers. \n The international community: This includes donors, their constituencies (including, if applicable, the diaspora who can influence the direction of DDR), troop-contributing countries, the UN system, international financial institutions, non-governmental organizations and think tanks.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -119071,7 +119071,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 1995, - "Paragraph": "In many cases, partnerships with other stakeholders are required to support the design, planning and implementation of the PI\/SC strategy. The following partners are often the secondary audience of a DDR process; however, depending on the context, they may also be the primary audience (e.g., the international community in a regionalized armed conflict): \\n Civil society: This includes women\u2019s groups, youth groups, local associations and non- governmental organizations that play a role in the DDR process, including those working as implementing partners of national and international governmental institutions. \\n Religious leaders and institutions: The voices of moderate religious leaders can be amplified and coordinated with educators to foster coordination and promote messages of peace and tolerance. \\n Legislative and policy-setting authorities: The legal framework in the country regulating the media can be reviewed and laws put in place to prevent the distribution of messages inciting hate or spreading misinformation. If this approach is used, care must be taken to ensure that civil and political rights are not affected. \\n International and local media: International and local media are often the main source of information on progress in the peace process. Keeping both media segments supplied with accurate and up-to-date information on the planning and implementation of DDR is important in order to increase support for the process and avoid bad press. The media are also key whistleblowers that can identify, expose and denounce potential spoilers of the peace process. \\n Private sector: Companies in the private sector can also be important amplifiers and partners, for example, by generating specific recruitment advertisements in support of reintegration opportunities. Local telecommunication companies and internet service providers can also offer avenues to further disseminate key messages. \\n Opinion leaders\/influencers: In many contexts, opinion leaders are public personalities who actively produce and interpret multiple sources of information to form an opinion. With the advent of social media, these actors generate viewership and large followings through regular programming and online presence. \\n Regional stakeholders: These include Governments, regional organizations, military and political parties of neighbouring countries, civil society in neighboring States, businesses and potential spoilers. \\n The international community: This includes donors, their constituencies (including, if applicable, the diaspora who can influence the direction of DDR), troop-contributing countries, the UN system, international financial institutions, non-governmental organizations and think tanks.", + "Paragraph": "In many cases, partnerships with other stakeholders are required to support the design, planning and implementation of the PI\/SC strategy. The following partners are often the secondary audience of a DDR process; however, depending on the context, they may also be the primary audience (e.g., the international community in a regionalized armed conflict): \n Civil society: This includes women\u2019s groups, youth groups, local associations and non- governmental organizations that play a role in the DDR process, including those working as implementing partners of national and international governmental institutions. \n Religious leaders and institutions: The voices of moderate religious leaders can be amplified and coordinated with educators to foster coordination and promote messages of peace and tolerance. \n Legislative and policy-setting authorities: The legal framework in the country regulating the media can be reviewed and laws put in place to prevent the distribution of messages inciting hate or spreading misinformation. If this approach is used, care must be taken to ensure that civil and political rights are not affected. \n International and local media: International and local media are often the main source of information on progress in the peace process. Keeping both media segments supplied with accurate and up-to-date information on the planning and implementation of DDR is important in order to increase support for the process and avoid bad press. The media are also key whistleblowers that can identify, expose and denounce potential spoilers of the peace process. \n Private sector: Companies in the private sector can also be important amplifiers and partners, for example, by generating specific recruitment advertisements in support of reintegration opportunities. Local telecommunication companies and internet service providers can also offer avenues to further disseminate key messages. \n Opinion leaders\/influencers: In many contexts, opinion leaders are public personalities who actively produce and interpret multiple sources of information to form an opinion. With the advent of social media, these actors generate viewership and large followings through regular programming and online presence. \n Regional stakeholders: These include Governments, regional organizations, military and political parties of neighbouring countries, civil society in neighboring States, businesses and potential spoilers. \n The international community: This includes donors, their constituencies (including, if applicable, the diaspora who can influence the direction of DDR), troop-contributing countries, the UN system, international financial institutions, non-governmental organizations and think tanks.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -119082,14 +119082,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Secondary audience (partners)", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Regional stakeholders: These include Governments, regional organizations, military and political parties of neighbouring countries, civil society in neighboring States, businesses and potential spoilers.", + "Sentence": "\n Regional stakeholders: These include Governments, regional organizations, military and political parties of neighbouring countries, civil society in neighboring States, businesses and potential spoilers.", "newParagraph": "many case partnership stakeholder required support design planning implementation pisc strategy following partner often secondary audience ddr process however depending context may also primary audience eg international community regionalized armed conflict n civil society includes woman group youth group local association non governmental organization play role ddr process including working implementing partner national international governmental institution n religious leader institution voice moderate religious leader amplified coordinated educator foster coordination promote message peace tolerance n legislative policysetting authority legal framework country regulating medium reviewed law put place prevent distribution message inciting hate spreading misinformation approach used care must taken ensure civil political right affected n international local medium international local medium often main source information progress peace process keeping medium segment supplied accurate uptodate information planning implementation ddr important order increase support process avoid bad press medium also key whistleblower identify expose denounce potential spoiler peace process n private sector company private sector also important amplifier partner example generating specific recruitment advertisement support reintegration opportunity local telecommunication company internet service provider also offer avenue disseminate key message n opinion leadersinfluencers many context opinion leader public personality actively produce interpret multiple source information form opinion advent social medium actor generate viewership large following regular programming online presence n regional stakeholder include government regional organization military political party neighbouring country civil society neighboring state business potential spoiler n international community includes donor constituency including applicable diaspora influence direction ddr troopcontributing country un system international financial institution nongovernmental organization think tank", "ProcessedSent": "n regional stakeholder include government regional organization military political party neighbouring country civil society neighboring state business potential spoiler", "SentID": 6615 }, { "ParagraphID": 1995, - "Paragraph": "In many cases, partnerships with other stakeholders are required to support the design, planning and implementation of the PI\/SC strategy. The following partners are often the secondary audience of a DDR process; however, depending on the context, they may also be the primary audience (e.g., the international community in a regionalized armed conflict): \\n Civil society: This includes women\u2019s groups, youth groups, local associations and non- governmental organizations that play a role in the DDR process, including those working as implementing partners of national and international governmental institutions. \\n Religious leaders and institutions: The voices of moderate religious leaders can be amplified and coordinated with educators to foster coordination and promote messages of peace and tolerance. \\n Legislative and policy-setting authorities: The legal framework in the country regulating the media can be reviewed and laws put in place to prevent the distribution of messages inciting hate or spreading misinformation. If this approach is used, care must be taken to ensure that civil and political rights are not affected. \\n International and local media: International and local media are often the main source of information on progress in the peace process. Keeping both media segments supplied with accurate and up-to-date information on the planning and implementation of DDR is important in order to increase support for the process and avoid bad press. The media are also key whistleblowers that can identify, expose and denounce potential spoilers of the peace process. \\n Private sector: Companies in the private sector can also be important amplifiers and partners, for example, by generating specific recruitment advertisements in support of reintegration opportunities. Local telecommunication companies and internet service providers can also offer avenues to further disseminate key messages. \\n Opinion leaders\/influencers: In many contexts, opinion leaders are public personalities who actively produce and interpret multiple sources of information to form an opinion. With the advent of social media, these actors generate viewership and large followings through regular programming and online presence. \\n Regional stakeholders: These include Governments, regional organizations, military and political parties of neighbouring countries, civil society in neighboring States, businesses and potential spoilers. \\n The international community: This includes donors, their constituencies (including, if applicable, the diaspora who can influence the direction of DDR), troop-contributing countries, the UN system, international financial institutions, non-governmental organizations and think tanks.", + "Paragraph": "In many cases, partnerships with other stakeholders are required to support the design, planning and implementation of the PI\/SC strategy. The following partners are often the secondary audience of a DDR process; however, depending on the context, they may also be the primary audience (e.g., the international community in a regionalized armed conflict): \n Civil society: This includes women\u2019s groups, youth groups, local associations and non- governmental organizations that play a role in the DDR process, including those working as implementing partners of national and international governmental institutions. \n Religious leaders and institutions: The voices of moderate religious leaders can be amplified and coordinated with educators to foster coordination and promote messages of peace and tolerance. \n Legislative and policy-setting authorities: The legal framework in the country regulating the media can be reviewed and laws put in place to prevent the distribution of messages inciting hate or spreading misinformation. If this approach is used, care must be taken to ensure that civil and political rights are not affected. \n International and local media: International and local media are often the main source of information on progress in the peace process. Keeping both media segments supplied with accurate and up-to-date information on the planning and implementation of DDR is important in order to increase support for the process and avoid bad press. The media are also key whistleblowers that can identify, expose and denounce potential spoilers of the peace process. \n Private sector: Companies in the private sector can also be important amplifiers and partners, for example, by generating specific recruitment advertisements in support of reintegration opportunities. Local telecommunication companies and internet service providers can also offer avenues to further disseminate key messages. \n Opinion leaders\/influencers: In many contexts, opinion leaders are public personalities who actively produce and interpret multiple sources of information to form an opinion. With the advent of social media, these actors generate viewership and large followings through regular programming and online presence. \n Regional stakeholders: These include Governments, regional organizations, military and political parties of neighbouring countries, civil society in neighboring States, businesses and potential spoilers. \n The international community: This includes donors, their constituencies (including, if applicable, the diaspora who can influence the direction of DDR), troop-contributing countries, the UN system, international financial institutions, non-governmental organizations and think tanks.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -119100,7 +119100,7 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Secondary audience (partners)", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The international community: This includes donors, their constituencies (including, if applicable, the diaspora who can influence the direction of DDR), troop-contributing countries, the UN system, international financial institutions, non-governmental organizations and think tanks.", + "Sentence": "\n The international community: This includes donors, their constituencies (including, if applicable, the diaspora who can influence the direction of DDR), troop-contributing countries, the UN system, international financial institutions, non-governmental organizations and think tanks.", "newParagraph": "many case partnership stakeholder required support design planning implementation pisc strategy following partner often secondary audience ddr process however depending context may also primary audience eg international community regionalized armed conflict n civil society includes woman group youth group local association non governmental organization play role ddr process including working implementing partner national international governmental institution n religious leader institution voice moderate religious leader amplified coordinated educator foster coordination promote message peace tolerance n legislative policysetting authority legal framework country regulating medium reviewed law put place prevent distribution message inciting hate spreading misinformation approach used care must taken ensure civil political right affected n international local medium international local medium often main source information progress peace process keeping medium segment supplied accurate uptodate information planning implementation ddr important order increase support process avoid bad press medium also key whistleblower identify expose denounce potential spoiler peace process n private sector company private sector also important amplifier partner example generating specific recruitment advertisement support reintegration opportunity local telecommunication company internet service provider also offer avenue disseminate key message n opinion leadersinfluencers many context opinion leader public personality actively produce interpret multiple source information form opinion advent social medium actor generate viewership large following regular programming online presence n regional stakeholder include government regional organization military political party neighbouring country civil society neighboring state business potential spoiler n international community includes donor constituency including applicable diaspora influence direction ddr troopcontributing country un system international financial institution nongovernmental organization think tank", "ProcessedSent": "n international community includes donor constituency including applicable diaspora influence direction ddr troopcontributing country un system international financial institution nongovernmental organization think tank", "SentID": 6616 @@ -119845,7 +119845,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2009, - "Paragraph": "From the start, it is important to identify measurable indicators (the pieces of information that will show whether objectives are being met) as well as how this information will be gathered (sources and techniques) in order to monitor and evaluate the impact of the PI\/SC strategy. Any aspects of the PI\/SC strategy that do not have the effect they were designed to achieve shall be adapted. Indicators may include: \\n The number, sex, age and location (e.g, rural or urban) of people listening to radio programmes and consulting other media, including websites and social media, that convey messages regarding DDR; \\n The number of participants and beneficiaries engaging in the DDR process as a result of PI\/SC activities; \\n The extent of the involvement of the local civilian population in reintegration programmes as a result of PI\/SC efforts; and \\n The change in expectations and knowledge about the process among target audiences before and after PI\/SC activities.", + "Paragraph": "From the start, it is important to identify measurable indicators (the pieces of information that will show whether objectives are being met) as well as how this information will be gathered (sources and techniques) in order to monitor and evaluate the impact of the PI\/SC strategy. Any aspects of the PI\/SC strategy that do not have the effect they were designed to achieve shall be adapted. Indicators may include: \n The number, sex, age and location (e.g, rural or urban) of people listening to radio programmes and consulting other media, including websites and social media, that convey messages regarding DDR; \n The number of participants and beneficiaries engaging in the DDR process as a result of PI\/SC activities; \n The extent of the involvement of the local civilian population in reintegration programmes as a result of PI\/SC efforts; and \n The change in expectations and knowledge about the process among target audiences before and after PI\/SC activities.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -119863,7 +119863,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2009, - "Paragraph": "From the start, it is important to identify measurable indicators (the pieces of information that will show whether objectives are being met) as well as how this information will be gathered (sources and techniques) in order to monitor and evaluate the impact of the PI\/SC strategy. Any aspects of the PI\/SC strategy that do not have the effect they were designed to achieve shall be adapted. Indicators may include: \\n The number, sex, age and location (e.g, rural or urban) of people listening to radio programmes and consulting other media, including websites and social media, that convey messages regarding DDR; \\n The number of participants and beneficiaries engaging in the DDR process as a result of PI\/SC activities; \\n The extent of the involvement of the local civilian population in reintegration programmes as a result of PI\/SC efforts; and \\n The change in expectations and knowledge about the process among target audiences before and after PI\/SC activities.", + "Paragraph": "From the start, it is important to identify measurable indicators (the pieces of information that will show whether objectives are being met) as well as how this information will be gathered (sources and techniques) in order to monitor and evaluate the impact of the PI\/SC strategy. Any aspects of the PI\/SC strategy that do not have the effect they were designed to achieve shall be adapted. Indicators may include: \n The number, sex, age and location (e.g, rural or urban) of people listening to radio programmes and consulting other media, including websites and social media, that convey messages regarding DDR; \n The number of participants and beneficiaries engaging in the DDR process as a result of PI\/SC activities; \n The extent of the involvement of the local civilian population in reintegration programmes as a result of PI\/SC efforts; and \n The change in expectations and knowledge about the process among target audiences before and after PI\/SC activities.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -119881,7 +119881,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2009, - "Paragraph": "From the start, it is important to identify measurable indicators (the pieces of information that will show whether objectives are being met) as well as how this information will be gathered (sources and techniques) in order to monitor and evaluate the impact of the PI\/SC strategy. Any aspects of the PI\/SC strategy that do not have the effect they were designed to achieve shall be adapted. Indicators may include: \\n The number, sex, age and location (e.g, rural or urban) of people listening to radio programmes and consulting other media, including websites and social media, that convey messages regarding DDR; \\n The number of participants and beneficiaries engaging in the DDR process as a result of PI\/SC activities; \\n The extent of the involvement of the local civilian population in reintegration programmes as a result of PI\/SC efforts; and \\n The change in expectations and knowledge about the process among target audiences before and after PI\/SC activities.", + "Paragraph": "From the start, it is important to identify measurable indicators (the pieces of information that will show whether objectives are being met) as well as how this information will be gathered (sources and techniques) in order to monitor and evaluate the impact of the PI\/SC strategy. Any aspects of the PI\/SC strategy that do not have the effect they were designed to achieve shall be adapted. Indicators may include: \n The number, sex, age and location (e.g, rural or urban) of people listening to radio programmes and consulting other media, including websites and social media, that convey messages regarding DDR; \n The number of participants and beneficiaries engaging in the DDR process as a result of PI\/SC activities; \n The extent of the involvement of the local civilian population in reintegration programmes as a result of PI\/SC efforts; and \n The change in expectations and knowledge about the process among target audiences before and after PI\/SC activities.", "Color": "#7366A3", "Level": 4, "LevelName": "Operations, Programmes and Support", @@ -119892,7 +119892,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Indicators may include: \\n The number, sex, age and location (e.g, rural or urban) of people listening to radio programmes and consulting other media, including websites and social media, that convey messages regarding DDR; \\n The number of participants and beneficiaries engaging in the DDR process as a result of PI\/SC activities; \\n The extent of the involvement of the local civilian population in reintegration programmes as a result of PI\/SC efforts; and \\n The change in expectations and knowledge about the process among target audiences before and after PI\/SC activities.", + "Sentence": "Indicators may include: \n The number, sex, age and location (e.g, rural or urban) of people listening to radio programmes and consulting other media, including websites and social media, that convey messages regarding DDR; \n The number of participants and beneficiaries engaging in the DDR process as a result of PI\/SC activities; \n The extent of the involvement of the local civilian population in reintegration programmes as a result of PI\/SC efforts; and \n The change in expectations and knowledge about the process among target audiences before and after PI\/SC activities.", "newParagraph": "start important identify measurable indicator piece information show whether objective met well information gathered source technique order monitor evaluate impact pisc strategy aspect pisc strategy effect designed achieve shall adapted indicator may include n number sex age location eg rural urban people listening radio programme consulting medium including website social medium convey message regarding ddr n number participant beneficiary engaging ddr process result pisc activity n extent involvement local civilian population reintegration programme result pisc effort n change expectation knowledge process among target audience pisc activity", "ProcessedSent": "indicator may include n number sex age location eg rural urban people listening radio programme consulting medium including website social medium convey message regarding ddr n number participant beneficiary engaging ddr process result pisc activity n extent involvement local civilian population reintegration programme result pisc effort n change expectation knowledge process among target audience pisc activity", "SentID": 6660 @@ -120331,7 +120331,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2018, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicated requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicated requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -120349,7 +120349,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2018, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicated requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicated requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -120360,14 +120360,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicated requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard.", + "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicated requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard.", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicated requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "ProcessedSent": "use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicated requirement method specification applied order conform standard", "SentID": 6686 }, { "ParagraphID": 2018, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicated requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicated requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -120378,14 +120378,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications.", + "Sentence": "\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications.", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicated requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "ProcessedSent": "n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification", "SentID": 6687 }, { "ParagraphID": 2018, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \\n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicated requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019 and \u2018may\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization standards and guidelines: \n \u201ca) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicated requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard. \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications. \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -120396,7 +120396,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", + "Sentence": "\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action.\u201d", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization standard guideline n shall used indicated requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "ProcessedSent": "n c may used indicate possible method course action ", "SentID": 6688 @@ -120889,7 +120889,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2026, - "Paragraph": "In UN-supported DDR, the following principles of gender equality are applied: \\n Non-discrimination, and fair and equitable treatment: In practice, this means that no group is to be given special status or treatment within a DDR programme, and that indivi- duals should not be discriminated against on the basis of gender, age, race, religion, nationality, ethnic origin, political opinion, or other personal characteristics or associa- tions. This is particularly important when establishing eligibility criteria for entry into DDR programmes (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament); \\n Gender equality and women\u2019s participation: Encouraging gender equality as a core principle of UN-supported DDR programmes means recognizing and supporting the equal rights of women and men, and girls and boys in the DDR process. The different experiences, roles and responsibilities of each of them during and after conflict should be recognized and reflected in the design and implementation of DDR programmes; \\n Respect for human rights: DDR programmes should support ways of preventing reprisal or discrimination against, or stigmatization of those who participate. The rights of the community should also be protected and upheld.", + "Paragraph": "In UN-supported DDR, the following principles of gender equality are applied: \n Non-discrimination, and fair and equitable treatment: In practice, this means that no group is to be given special status or treatment within a DDR programme, and that indivi- duals should not be discriminated against on the basis of gender, age, race, religion, nationality, ethnic origin, political opinion, or other personal characteristics or associa- tions. This is particularly important when establishing eligibility criteria for entry into DDR programmes (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament); \n Gender equality and women\u2019s participation: Encouraging gender equality as a core principle of UN-supported DDR programmes means recognizing and supporting the equal rights of women and men, and girls and boys in the DDR process. The different experiences, roles and responsibilities of each of them during and after conflict should be recognized and reflected in the design and implementation of DDR programmes; \n Respect for human rights: DDR programmes should support ways of preventing reprisal or discrimination against, or stigmatization of those who participate. The rights of the community should also be protected and upheld.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -120900,14 +120900,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "In UN-supported DDR, the following principles of gender equality are applied: \\n Non-discrimination, and fair and equitable treatment: In practice, this means that no group is to be given special status or treatment within a DDR programme, and that indivi- duals should not be discriminated against on the basis of gender, age, race, religion, nationality, ethnic origin, political opinion, or other personal characteristics or associa- tions.", + "Sentence": "In UN-supported DDR, the following principles of gender equality are applied: \n Non-discrimination, and fair and equitable treatment: In practice, this means that no group is to be given special status or treatment within a DDR programme, and that indivi- duals should not be discriminated against on the basis of gender, age, race, religion, nationality, ethnic origin, political opinion, or other personal characteristics or associa- tions.", "newParagraph": "unsupported ddr following principle gender equality applied n nondiscrimination fair equitable treatment practice mean group given special status treatment within ddr programme indivi duals discriminated basis gender age race religion nationality ethnic origin political opinion personal characteristic associa tions particularly important establishing eligibility criterion entry ddr programme also see iddrs 410 disarmament n gender equality woman participation encouraging gender equality core principle unsupported ddr programme mean recognizing supporting equal right woman men girl boy ddr process different experience role responsibility conflict recognized reflected design implementation ddr programme n respect human right ddr programme support way preventing reprisal discrimination stigmatization participate right community also protected upheld", "ProcessedSent": "unsupported ddr following principle gender equality applied n nondiscrimination fair equitable treatment practice mean group given special status treatment within ddr programme indivi duals discriminated basis gender age race religion nationality ethnic origin political opinion personal characteristic associa tions", "SentID": 6716 }, { "ParagraphID": 2026, - "Paragraph": "In UN-supported DDR, the following principles of gender equality are applied: \\n Non-discrimination, and fair and equitable treatment: In practice, this means that no group is to be given special status or treatment within a DDR programme, and that indivi- duals should not be discriminated against on the basis of gender, age, race, religion, nationality, ethnic origin, political opinion, or other personal characteristics or associa- tions. This is particularly important when establishing eligibility criteria for entry into DDR programmes (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament); \\n Gender equality and women\u2019s participation: Encouraging gender equality as a core principle of UN-supported DDR programmes means recognizing and supporting the equal rights of women and men, and girls and boys in the DDR process. The different experiences, roles and responsibilities of each of them during and after conflict should be recognized and reflected in the design and implementation of DDR programmes; \\n Respect for human rights: DDR programmes should support ways of preventing reprisal or discrimination against, or stigmatization of those who participate. The rights of the community should also be protected and upheld.", + "Paragraph": "In UN-supported DDR, the following principles of gender equality are applied: \n Non-discrimination, and fair and equitable treatment: In practice, this means that no group is to be given special status or treatment within a DDR programme, and that indivi- duals should not be discriminated against on the basis of gender, age, race, religion, nationality, ethnic origin, political opinion, or other personal characteristics or associa- tions. This is particularly important when establishing eligibility criteria for entry into DDR programmes (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament); \n Gender equality and women\u2019s participation: Encouraging gender equality as a core principle of UN-supported DDR programmes means recognizing and supporting the equal rights of women and men, and girls and boys in the DDR process. The different experiences, roles and responsibilities of each of them during and after conflict should be recognized and reflected in the design and implementation of DDR programmes; \n Respect for human rights: DDR programmes should support ways of preventing reprisal or discrimination against, or stigmatization of those who participate. The rights of the community should also be protected and upheld.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -120918,14 +120918,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This is particularly important when establishing eligibility criteria for entry into DDR programmes (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament); \\n Gender equality and women\u2019s participation: Encouraging gender equality as a core principle of UN-supported DDR programmes means recognizing and supporting the equal rights of women and men, and girls and boys in the DDR process.", + "Sentence": "This is particularly important when establishing eligibility criteria for entry into DDR programmes (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament); \n Gender equality and women\u2019s participation: Encouraging gender equality as a core principle of UN-supported DDR programmes means recognizing and supporting the equal rights of women and men, and girls and boys in the DDR process.", "newParagraph": "unsupported ddr following principle gender equality applied n nondiscrimination fair equitable treatment practice mean group given special status treatment within ddr programme indivi duals discriminated basis gender age race religion nationality ethnic origin political opinion personal characteristic associa tions particularly important establishing eligibility criterion entry ddr programme also see iddrs 410 disarmament n gender equality woman participation encouraging gender equality core principle unsupported ddr programme mean recognizing supporting equal right woman men girl boy ddr process different experience role responsibility conflict recognized reflected design implementation ddr programme n respect human right ddr programme support way preventing reprisal discrimination stigmatization participate right community also protected upheld", "ProcessedSent": "particularly important establishing eligibility criterion entry ddr programme also see iddrs 410 disarmament n gender equality woman participation encouraging gender equality core principle unsupported ddr programme mean recognizing supporting equal right woman men girl boy ddr process", "SentID": 6717 }, { "ParagraphID": 2026, - "Paragraph": "In UN-supported DDR, the following principles of gender equality are applied: \\n Non-discrimination, and fair and equitable treatment: In practice, this means that no group is to be given special status or treatment within a DDR programme, and that indivi- duals should not be discriminated against on the basis of gender, age, race, religion, nationality, ethnic origin, political opinion, or other personal characteristics or associa- tions. This is particularly important when establishing eligibility criteria for entry into DDR programmes (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament); \\n Gender equality and women\u2019s participation: Encouraging gender equality as a core principle of UN-supported DDR programmes means recognizing and supporting the equal rights of women and men, and girls and boys in the DDR process. The different experiences, roles and responsibilities of each of them during and after conflict should be recognized and reflected in the design and implementation of DDR programmes; \\n Respect for human rights: DDR programmes should support ways of preventing reprisal or discrimination against, or stigmatization of those who participate. The rights of the community should also be protected and upheld.", + "Paragraph": "In UN-supported DDR, the following principles of gender equality are applied: \n Non-discrimination, and fair and equitable treatment: In practice, this means that no group is to be given special status or treatment within a DDR programme, and that indivi- duals should not be discriminated against on the basis of gender, age, race, religion, nationality, ethnic origin, political opinion, or other personal characteristics or associa- tions. This is particularly important when establishing eligibility criteria for entry into DDR programmes (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament); \n Gender equality and women\u2019s participation: Encouraging gender equality as a core principle of UN-supported DDR programmes means recognizing and supporting the equal rights of women and men, and girls and boys in the DDR process. The different experiences, roles and responsibilities of each of them during and after conflict should be recognized and reflected in the design and implementation of DDR programmes; \n Respect for human rights: DDR programmes should support ways of preventing reprisal or discrimination against, or stigmatization of those who participate. The rights of the community should also be protected and upheld.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -120936,14 +120936,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The different experiences, roles and responsibilities of each of them during and after conflict should be recognized and reflected in the design and implementation of DDR programmes; \\n Respect for human rights: DDR programmes should support ways of preventing reprisal or discrimination against, or stigmatization of those who participate.", + "Sentence": "The different experiences, roles and responsibilities of each of them during and after conflict should be recognized and reflected in the design and implementation of DDR programmes; \n Respect for human rights: DDR programmes should support ways of preventing reprisal or discrimination against, or stigmatization of those who participate.", "newParagraph": "unsupported ddr following principle gender equality applied n nondiscrimination fair equitable treatment practice mean group given special status treatment within ddr programme indivi duals discriminated basis gender age race religion nationality ethnic origin political opinion personal characteristic associa tions particularly important establishing eligibility criterion entry ddr programme also see iddrs 410 disarmament n gender equality woman participation encouraging gender equality core principle unsupported ddr programme mean recognizing supporting equal right woman men girl boy ddr process different experience role responsibility conflict recognized reflected design implementation ddr programme n respect human right ddr programme support way preventing reprisal discrimination stigmatization participate right community also protected upheld", "ProcessedSent": "different experience role responsibility conflict recognized reflected design implementation ddr programme n respect human right ddr programme support way preventing reprisal discrimination stigmatization participate", "SentID": 6718 }, { "ParagraphID": 2026, - "Paragraph": "In UN-supported DDR, the following principles of gender equality are applied: \\n Non-discrimination, and fair and equitable treatment: In practice, this means that no group is to be given special status or treatment within a DDR programme, and that indivi- duals should not be discriminated against on the basis of gender, age, race, religion, nationality, ethnic origin, political opinion, or other personal characteristics or associa- tions. This is particularly important when establishing eligibility criteria for entry into DDR programmes (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament); \\n Gender equality and women\u2019s participation: Encouraging gender equality as a core principle of UN-supported DDR programmes means recognizing and supporting the equal rights of women and men, and girls and boys in the DDR process. The different experiences, roles and responsibilities of each of them during and after conflict should be recognized and reflected in the design and implementation of DDR programmes; \\n Respect for human rights: DDR programmes should support ways of preventing reprisal or discrimination against, or stigmatization of those who participate. The rights of the community should also be protected and upheld.", + "Paragraph": "In UN-supported DDR, the following principles of gender equality are applied: \n Non-discrimination, and fair and equitable treatment: In practice, this means that no group is to be given special status or treatment within a DDR programme, and that indivi- duals should not be discriminated against on the basis of gender, age, race, religion, nationality, ethnic origin, political opinion, or other personal characteristics or associa- tions. This is particularly important when establishing eligibility criteria for entry into DDR programmes (also see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament); \n Gender equality and women\u2019s participation: Encouraging gender equality as a core principle of UN-supported DDR programmes means recognizing and supporting the equal rights of women and men, and girls and boys in the DDR process. The different experiences, roles and responsibilities of each of them during and after conflict should be recognized and reflected in the design and implementation of DDR programmes; \n Respect for human rights: DDR programmes should support ways of preventing reprisal or discrimination against, or stigmatization of those who participate. The rights of the community should also be protected and upheld.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -121015,7 +121015,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2028, - "Paragraph": "At the Fourth World Conference on Women, held in Beijing in 1995, 189 Member States com- mitted themselves to a range of strategic objectives and actions aimed at achieving gender equality. The Member States repeated their commitment to ensuring that women make up 30 percent of all decision-making bodies and further committed themselves, among other things, to: \\n increase the participation of women in conflict resolution at decision-making levels, and protect women living in situations of armed and other conflicts or under foreign occupation (E.1); \\n reduce excessive military expenditures and control the availability of armaments (E.2); \\n encourage and support women\u2019s contribution to fostering a culture of peace (E.4).", + "Paragraph": "At the Fourth World Conference on Women, held in Beijing in 1995, 189 Member States com- mitted themselves to a range of strategic objectives and actions aimed at achieving gender equality. The Member States repeated their commitment to ensuring that women make up 30 percent of all decision-making bodies and further committed themselves, among other things, to: \n increase the participation of women in conflict resolution at decision-making levels, and protect women living in situations of armed and other conflicts or under foreign occupation (E.1); \n reduce excessive military expenditures and control the availability of armaments (E.2); \n encourage and support women\u2019s contribution to fostering a culture of peace (E.4).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -121033,7 +121033,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2028, - "Paragraph": "At the Fourth World Conference on Women, held in Beijing in 1995, 189 Member States com- mitted themselves to a range of strategic objectives and actions aimed at achieving gender equality. The Member States repeated their commitment to ensuring that women make up 30 percent of all decision-making bodies and further committed themselves, among other things, to: \\n increase the participation of women in conflict resolution at decision-making levels, and protect women living in situations of armed and other conflicts or under foreign occupation (E.1); \\n reduce excessive military expenditures and control the availability of armaments (E.2); \\n encourage and support women\u2019s contribution to fostering a culture of peace (E.4).", + "Paragraph": "At the Fourth World Conference on Women, held in Beijing in 1995, 189 Member States com- mitted themselves to a range of strategic objectives and actions aimed at achieving gender equality. The Member States repeated their commitment to ensuring that women make up 30 percent of all decision-making bodies and further committed themselves, among other things, to: \n increase the participation of women in conflict resolution at decision-making levels, and protect women living in situations of armed and other conflicts or under foreign occupation (E.1); \n reduce excessive military expenditures and control the availability of armaments (E.2); \n encourage and support women\u2019s contribution to fostering a culture of peace (E.4).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -121044,14 +121044,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. The Beijing Platform for Action", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The Member States repeated their commitment to ensuring that women make up 30 percent of all decision-making bodies and further committed themselves, among other things, to: \\n increase the participation of women in conflict resolution at decision-making levels, and protect women living in situations of armed and other conflicts or under foreign occupation (E.1); \\n reduce excessive military expenditures and control the availability of armaments (E.2); \\n encourage and support women\u2019s contribution to fostering a culture of peace (E.4).", + "Sentence": "The Member States repeated their commitment to ensuring that women make up 30 percent of all decision-making bodies and further committed themselves, among other things, to: \n increase the participation of women in conflict resolution at decision-making levels, and protect women living in situations of armed and other conflicts or under foreign occupation (E.1); \n reduce excessive military expenditures and control the availability of armaments (E.2); \n encourage and support women\u2019s contribution to fostering a culture of peace (E.4).", "newParagraph": "fourth world conference woman held beijing 1995 189 member state com mitted range strategic objective action aimed achieving gender equality member state repeated commitment ensuring woman make 30 percent decisionmaking body committed among thing n increase participation woman conflict resolution decisionmaking level protect woman living situation armed conflict foreign occupation e1 n reduce excessive military expenditure control availability armament e2 n encourage support woman contribution fostering culture peace e4", "ProcessedSent": "member state repeated commitment ensuring woman make 30 percent decisionmaking body committed among thing n increase participation woman conflict resolution decisionmaking level protect woman living situation armed conflict foreign occupation e1 n reduce excessive military expenditure control availability armament e2 n encourage support woman contribution fostering culture peace e4", "SentID": 6724 }, { "ParagraphID": 2029, - "Paragraph": "In his 2002 Study on Women, Peace and Security, the Secretary-General recommended the following actions on DDR: \\n Action 1: Incorporate the needs and priorities of women and girls as ex-combatants, \u2018camp-followers\u201d\u2019 and families of ex-combatants in the design and implementation of DDR programmes, including the design of camps; the distribution of benefits; and access to basic resources and services, including food, water, health care and counsel- ling, in order to ensure the success of such programmes, women and girls\u2019 full partici- pation, and their access to benefits; \\n Action 2: Increase the number of programmes for child soldiers, fully include attention to the specific situation and needs of girl soldiers, and identify means to support child soldiers, including girls, who do not enter DDR programmes; \\n Action 3: Recognize the impact of armed conflict and displacement on family relations, and develop awareness of the risk of increased domestic violence, especially in the fami- lies of ex-combatants; and develop programmes on the prevention of domestic violence that are designed for families and communities, and especially male ex-combatants; \\n Action 4: Recognize and use the contributions of women and girls in encouraging ex- combatants to lay down arms and participate in weapons-collection programmes, and ensure that they benefit from any incentives provided for such activities; \\n Action 5: Ensure full access of women and girls to all resources and benefits provided in reintegration programmes, including skills development programmes.", + "Paragraph": "In his 2002 Study on Women, Peace and Security, the Secretary-General recommended the following actions on DDR: \n Action 1: Incorporate the needs and priorities of women and girls as ex-combatants, \u2018camp-followers\u201d\u2019 and families of ex-combatants in the design and implementation of DDR programmes, including the design of camps; the distribution of benefits; and access to basic resources and services, including food, water, health care and counsel- ling, in order to ensure the success of such programmes, women and girls\u2019 full partici- pation, and their access to benefits; \n Action 2: Increase the number of programmes for child soldiers, fully include attention to the specific situation and needs of girl soldiers, and identify means to support child soldiers, including girls, who do not enter DDR programmes; \n Action 3: Recognize the impact of armed conflict and displacement on family relations, and develop awareness of the risk of increased domestic violence, especially in the fami- lies of ex-combatants; and develop programmes on the prevention of domestic violence that are designed for families and communities, and especially male ex-combatants; \n Action 4: Recognize and use the contributions of women and girls in encouraging ex- combatants to lay down arms and participate in weapons-collection programmes, and ensure that they benefit from any incentives provided for such activities; \n Action 5: Ensure full access of women and girls to all resources and benefits provided in reintegration programmes, including skills development programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -121062,7 +121062,7 @@ "Heading2": "5.3. The Secretary-General\u2019s Study on Women, Peace and Security", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "In his 2002 Study on Women, Peace and Security, the Secretary-General recommended the following actions on DDR: \\n Action 1: Incorporate the needs and priorities of women and girls as ex-combatants, \u2018camp-followers\u201d\u2019 and families of ex-combatants in the design and implementation of DDR programmes, including the design of camps; the distribution of benefits; and access to basic resources and services, including food, water, health care and counsel- ling, in order to ensure the success of such programmes, women and girls\u2019 full partici- pation, and their access to benefits; \\n Action 2: Increase the number of programmes for child soldiers, fully include attention to the specific situation and needs of girl soldiers, and identify means to support child soldiers, including girls, who do not enter DDR programmes; \\n Action 3: Recognize the impact of armed conflict and displacement on family relations, and develop awareness of the risk of increased domestic violence, especially in the fami- lies of ex-combatants; and develop programmes on the prevention of domestic violence that are designed for families and communities, and especially male ex-combatants; \\n Action 4: Recognize and use the contributions of women and girls in encouraging ex- combatants to lay down arms and participate in weapons-collection programmes, and ensure that they benefit from any incentives provided for such activities; \\n Action 5: Ensure full access of women and girls to all resources and benefits provided in reintegration programmes, including skills development programmes.", + "Sentence": "In his 2002 Study on Women, Peace and Security, the Secretary-General recommended the following actions on DDR: \n Action 1: Incorporate the needs and priorities of women and girls as ex-combatants, \u2018camp-followers\u201d\u2019 and families of ex-combatants in the design and implementation of DDR programmes, including the design of camps; the distribution of benefits; and access to basic resources and services, including food, water, health care and counsel- ling, in order to ensure the success of such programmes, women and girls\u2019 full partici- pation, and their access to benefits; \n Action 2: Increase the number of programmes for child soldiers, fully include attention to the specific situation and needs of girl soldiers, and identify means to support child soldiers, including girls, who do not enter DDR programmes; \n Action 3: Recognize the impact of armed conflict and displacement on family relations, and develop awareness of the risk of increased domestic violence, especially in the fami- lies of ex-combatants; and develop programmes on the prevention of domestic violence that are designed for families and communities, and especially male ex-combatants; \n Action 4: Recognize and use the contributions of women and girls in encouraging ex- combatants to lay down arms and participate in weapons-collection programmes, and ensure that they benefit from any incentives provided for such activities; \n Action 5: Ensure full access of women and girls to all resources and benefits provided in reintegration programmes, including skills development programmes.", "newParagraph": "2002 study woman peace security secretarygeneral recommended following action ddr n action 1 incorporate need priority woman girl excombatants campfollowers family excombatants design implementation ddr programme including design camp distribution benefit access basic resource service including food water health care counsel ling order ensure success programme woman girl full partici pation access benefit n action 2 increase number programme child soldier fully include attention specific situation need girl soldier identify mean support child soldier including girl enter ddr programme n action 3 recognize impact armed conflict displacement family relation develop awareness risk increased domestic violence especially fami lie excombatants develop programme prevention domestic violence designed family community especially male excombatants n action 4 recognize use contribution woman girl encouraging ex combatant lay arm participate weaponscollection programme ensure benefit incentive provided activity n action 5 ensure full access woman girl resource benefit provided reintegration programme including skill development programme", "ProcessedSent": "2002 study woman peace security secretarygeneral recommended following action ddr n action 1 incorporate need priority woman girl excombatants campfollowers family excombatants design implementation ddr programme including design camp distribution benefit access basic resource service including food water health care counsel ling order ensure success programme woman girl full partici pation access benefit n action 2 increase number programme child soldier fully include attention specific situation need girl soldier identify mean support child soldier including girl enter ddr programme n action 3 recognize impact armed conflict displacement family relation develop awareness risk increased domestic violence especially fami lie excombatants develop programme prevention domestic violence designed family community especially male excombatants n action 4 recognize use contribution woman girl encouraging ex combatant lay arm participate weaponscollection programme ensure benefit incentive provided activity n action 5 ensure full access woman girl resource benefit provided reintegration programme including skill development programme", "SentID": 6725 @@ -121483,7 +121483,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2038, - "Paragraph": "Planners should develop a good understanding of the legal, political, economic, social and security context of the DDR programme and how it affects women, men, girls and boys differently, both in the armed forces and groups and in the receiving communities. In addition, planners should understand the different needs of women, men, girls and boys who participate in DDR processes according to their different roles during the conflict (i.e., armed ex-combatants, supporters, or\/and depend- ants). The following should be considered. \\n Different choices: There may be a difference in the life choices made by women and girls, as opposed to men and boys. This is because women, men, girls and boys have different roles before, during and after conflicts, and they face different problems and expectations from society and their family. They may, as a result, have different prefer- ences for reintegration training and support. Some women and girls may wish to return to their original homes, while others may choose to follow male partners to a new loca- tion, including across international boundaries; \\n Different functions: Many women and girls participate in armed conflict in roles other than as armed combatants. These individuals, who may have participated as cooks, mes- sengers, informal health care providers, por- ters, sex slaves, etc., are often overlooked in the DDR process. Women and girls carry out these roles both through choice and, in the case of abductees and slaves, because they are forced to do so.", + "Paragraph": "Planners should develop a good understanding of the legal, political, economic, social and security context of the DDR programme and how it affects women, men, girls and boys differently, both in the armed forces and groups and in the receiving communities. In addition, planners should understand the different needs of women, men, girls and boys who participate in DDR processes according to their different roles during the conflict (i.e., armed ex-combatants, supporters, or\/and depend- ants). The following should be considered. \n Different choices: There may be a difference in the life choices made by women and girls, as opposed to men and boys. This is because women, men, girls and boys have different roles before, during and after conflicts, and they face different problems and expectations from society and their family. They may, as a result, have different prefer- ences for reintegration training and support. Some women and girls may wish to return to their original homes, while others may choose to follow male partners to a new loca- tion, including across international boundaries; \n Different functions: Many women and girls participate in armed conflict in roles other than as armed combatants. These individuals, who may have participated as cooks, mes- sengers, informal health care providers, por- ters, sex slaves, etc., are often overlooked in the DDR process. Women and girls carry out these roles both through choice and, in the case of abductees and slaves, because they are forced to do so.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -121501,7 +121501,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2038, - "Paragraph": "Planners should develop a good understanding of the legal, political, economic, social and security context of the DDR programme and how it affects women, men, girls and boys differently, both in the armed forces and groups and in the receiving communities. In addition, planners should understand the different needs of women, men, girls and boys who participate in DDR processes according to their different roles during the conflict (i.e., armed ex-combatants, supporters, or\/and depend- ants). The following should be considered. \\n Different choices: There may be a difference in the life choices made by women and girls, as opposed to men and boys. This is because women, men, girls and boys have different roles before, during and after conflicts, and they face different problems and expectations from society and their family. They may, as a result, have different prefer- ences for reintegration training and support. Some women and girls may wish to return to their original homes, while others may choose to follow male partners to a new loca- tion, including across international boundaries; \\n Different functions: Many women and girls participate in armed conflict in roles other than as armed combatants. These individuals, who may have participated as cooks, mes- sengers, informal health care providers, por- ters, sex slaves, etc., are often overlooked in the DDR process. Women and girls carry out these roles both through choice and, in the case of abductees and slaves, because they are forced to do so.", + "Paragraph": "Planners should develop a good understanding of the legal, political, economic, social and security context of the DDR programme and how it affects women, men, girls and boys differently, both in the armed forces and groups and in the receiving communities. In addition, planners should understand the different needs of women, men, girls and boys who participate in DDR processes according to their different roles during the conflict (i.e., armed ex-combatants, supporters, or\/and depend- ants). The following should be considered. \n Different choices: There may be a difference in the life choices made by women and girls, as opposed to men and boys. This is because women, men, girls and boys have different roles before, during and after conflicts, and they face different problems and expectations from society and their family. They may, as a result, have different prefer- ences for reintegration training and support. Some women and girls may wish to return to their original homes, while others may choose to follow male partners to a new loca- tion, including across international boundaries; \n Different functions: Many women and girls participate in armed conflict in roles other than as armed combatants. These individuals, who may have participated as cooks, mes- sengers, informal health care providers, por- ters, sex slaves, etc., are often overlooked in the DDR process. Women and girls carry out these roles both through choice and, in the case of abductees and slaves, because they are forced to do so.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -121519,7 +121519,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2038, - "Paragraph": "Planners should develop a good understanding of the legal, political, economic, social and security context of the DDR programme and how it affects women, men, girls and boys differently, both in the armed forces and groups and in the receiving communities. In addition, planners should understand the different needs of women, men, girls and boys who participate in DDR processes according to their different roles during the conflict (i.e., armed ex-combatants, supporters, or\/and depend- ants). The following should be considered. \\n Different choices: There may be a difference in the life choices made by women and girls, as opposed to men and boys. This is because women, men, girls and boys have different roles before, during and after conflicts, and they face different problems and expectations from society and their family. They may, as a result, have different prefer- ences for reintegration training and support. Some women and girls may wish to return to their original homes, while others may choose to follow male partners to a new loca- tion, including across international boundaries; \\n Different functions: Many women and girls participate in armed conflict in roles other than as armed combatants. These individuals, who may have participated as cooks, mes- sengers, informal health care providers, por- ters, sex slaves, etc., are often overlooked in the DDR process. Women and girls carry out these roles both through choice and, in the case of abductees and slaves, because they are forced to do so.", + "Paragraph": "Planners should develop a good understanding of the legal, political, economic, social and security context of the DDR programme and how it affects women, men, girls and boys differently, both in the armed forces and groups and in the receiving communities. In addition, planners should understand the different needs of women, men, girls and boys who participate in DDR processes according to their different roles during the conflict (i.e., armed ex-combatants, supporters, or\/and depend- ants). The following should be considered. \n Different choices: There may be a difference in the life choices made by women and girls, as opposed to men and boys. This is because women, men, girls and boys have different roles before, during and after conflicts, and they face different problems and expectations from society and their family. They may, as a result, have different prefer- ences for reintegration training and support. Some women and girls may wish to return to their original homes, while others may choose to follow male partners to a new loca- tion, including across international boundaries; \n Different functions: Many women and girls participate in armed conflict in roles other than as armed combatants. These individuals, who may have participated as cooks, mes- sengers, informal health care providers, por- ters, sex slaves, etc., are often overlooked in the DDR process. Women and girls carry out these roles both through choice and, in the case of abductees and slaves, because they are forced to do so.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -121537,7 +121537,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2038, - "Paragraph": "Planners should develop a good understanding of the legal, political, economic, social and security context of the DDR programme and how it affects women, men, girls and boys differently, both in the armed forces and groups and in the receiving communities. In addition, planners should understand the different needs of women, men, girls and boys who participate in DDR processes according to their different roles during the conflict (i.e., armed ex-combatants, supporters, or\/and depend- ants). The following should be considered. \\n Different choices: There may be a difference in the life choices made by women and girls, as opposed to men and boys. This is because women, men, girls and boys have different roles before, during and after conflicts, and they face different problems and expectations from society and their family. They may, as a result, have different prefer- ences for reintegration training and support. Some women and girls may wish to return to their original homes, while others may choose to follow male partners to a new loca- tion, including across international boundaries; \\n Different functions: Many women and girls participate in armed conflict in roles other than as armed combatants. These individuals, who may have participated as cooks, mes- sengers, informal health care providers, por- ters, sex slaves, etc., are often overlooked in the DDR process. Women and girls carry out these roles both through choice and, in the case of abductees and slaves, because they are forced to do so.", + "Paragraph": "Planners should develop a good understanding of the legal, political, economic, social and security context of the DDR programme and how it affects women, men, girls and boys differently, both in the armed forces and groups and in the receiving communities. In addition, planners should understand the different needs of women, men, girls and boys who participate in DDR processes according to their different roles during the conflict (i.e., armed ex-combatants, supporters, or\/and depend- ants). The following should be considered. \n Different choices: There may be a difference in the life choices made by women and girls, as opposed to men and boys. This is because women, men, girls and boys have different roles before, during and after conflicts, and they face different problems and expectations from society and their family. They may, as a result, have different prefer- ences for reintegration training and support. Some women and girls may wish to return to their original homes, while others may choose to follow male partners to a new loca- tion, including across international boundaries; \n Different functions: Many women and girls participate in armed conflict in roles other than as armed combatants. These individuals, who may have participated as cooks, mes- sengers, informal health care providers, por- ters, sex slaves, etc., are often overlooked in the DDR process. Women and girls carry out these roles both through choice and, in the case of abductees and slaves, because they are forced to do so.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -121548,14 +121548,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.2 Assessment phase", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Different choices: There may be a difference in the life choices made by women and girls, as opposed to men and boys.", + "Sentence": "\n Different choices: There may be a difference in the life choices made by women and girls, as opposed to men and boys.", "newParagraph": "planner develop good understanding legal political economic social security context ddr programme affect woman men girl boy differently armed force group receiving community addition planner understand different need woman men girl boy participate ddr process according different role conflict ie armed excombatants supporter orand depend ant following considered n different choice may difference life choice made woman girl opposed men boy woman men girl boy different role conflict face different problem expectation society family may result different prefer ences reintegration training support woman girl may wish return original home others may choose follow male partner new loca tion including across international boundary n different function many woman girl participate armed conflict role armed combatant individual may participated cook me sengers informal health care provider por ters sex slave etc often overlooked ddr process woman girl carry role choice case abductees slave forced", "ProcessedSent": "n different choice may difference life choice made woman girl opposed men boy", "SentID": 6752 }, { "ParagraphID": 2038, - "Paragraph": "Planners should develop a good understanding of the legal, political, economic, social and security context of the DDR programme and how it affects women, men, girls and boys differently, both in the armed forces and groups and in the receiving communities. In addition, planners should understand the different needs of women, men, girls and boys who participate in DDR processes according to their different roles during the conflict (i.e., armed ex-combatants, supporters, or\/and depend- ants). The following should be considered. \\n Different choices: There may be a difference in the life choices made by women and girls, as opposed to men and boys. This is because women, men, girls and boys have different roles before, during and after conflicts, and they face different problems and expectations from society and their family. They may, as a result, have different prefer- ences for reintegration training and support. Some women and girls may wish to return to their original homes, while others may choose to follow male partners to a new loca- tion, including across international boundaries; \\n Different functions: Many women and girls participate in armed conflict in roles other than as armed combatants. These individuals, who may have participated as cooks, mes- sengers, informal health care providers, por- ters, sex slaves, etc., are often overlooked in the DDR process. Women and girls carry out these roles both through choice and, in the case of abductees and slaves, because they are forced to do so.", + "Paragraph": "Planners should develop a good understanding of the legal, political, economic, social and security context of the DDR programme and how it affects women, men, girls and boys differently, both in the armed forces and groups and in the receiving communities. In addition, planners should understand the different needs of women, men, girls and boys who participate in DDR processes according to their different roles during the conflict (i.e., armed ex-combatants, supporters, or\/and depend- ants). The following should be considered. \n Different choices: There may be a difference in the life choices made by women and girls, as opposed to men and boys. This is because women, men, girls and boys have different roles before, during and after conflicts, and they face different problems and expectations from society and their family. They may, as a result, have different prefer- ences for reintegration training and support. Some women and girls may wish to return to their original homes, while others may choose to follow male partners to a new loca- tion, including across international boundaries; \n Different functions: Many women and girls participate in armed conflict in roles other than as armed combatants. These individuals, who may have participated as cooks, mes- sengers, informal health care providers, por- ters, sex slaves, etc., are often overlooked in the DDR process. Women and girls carry out these roles both through choice and, in the case of abductees and slaves, because they are forced to do so.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -121573,7 +121573,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2038, - "Paragraph": "Planners should develop a good understanding of the legal, political, economic, social and security context of the DDR programme and how it affects women, men, girls and boys differently, both in the armed forces and groups and in the receiving communities. In addition, planners should understand the different needs of women, men, girls and boys who participate in DDR processes according to their different roles during the conflict (i.e., armed ex-combatants, supporters, or\/and depend- ants). The following should be considered. \\n Different choices: There may be a difference in the life choices made by women and girls, as opposed to men and boys. This is because women, men, girls and boys have different roles before, during and after conflicts, and they face different problems and expectations from society and their family. They may, as a result, have different prefer- ences for reintegration training and support. Some women and girls may wish to return to their original homes, while others may choose to follow male partners to a new loca- tion, including across international boundaries; \\n Different functions: Many women and girls participate in armed conflict in roles other than as armed combatants. These individuals, who may have participated as cooks, mes- sengers, informal health care providers, por- ters, sex slaves, etc., are often overlooked in the DDR process. Women and girls carry out these roles both through choice and, in the case of abductees and slaves, because they are forced to do so.", + "Paragraph": "Planners should develop a good understanding of the legal, political, economic, social and security context of the DDR programme and how it affects women, men, girls and boys differently, both in the armed forces and groups and in the receiving communities. In addition, planners should understand the different needs of women, men, girls and boys who participate in DDR processes according to their different roles during the conflict (i.e., armed ex-combatants, supporters, or\/and depend- ants). The following should be considered. \n Different choices: There may be a difference in the life choices made by women and girls, as opposed to men and boys. This is because women, men, girls and boys have different roles before, during and after conflicts, and they face different problems and expectations from society and their family. They may, as a result, have different prefer- ences for reintegration training and support. Some women and girls may wish to return to their original homes, while others may choose to follow male partners to a new loca- tion, including across international boundaries; \n Different functions: Many women and girls participate in armed conflict in roles other than as armed combatants. These individuals, who may have participated as cooks, mes- sengers, informal health care providers, por- ters, sex slaves, etc., are often overlooked in the DDR process. Women and girls carry out these roles both through choice and, in the case of abductees and slaves, because they are forced to do so.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -121591,7 +121591,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2038, - "Paragraph": "Planners should develop a good understanding of the legal, political, economic, social and security context of the DDR programme and how it affects women, men, girls and boys differently, both in the armed forces and groups and in the receiving communities. In addition, planners should understand the different needs of women, men, girls and boys who participate in DDR processes according to their different roles during the conflict (i.e., armed ex-combatants, supporters, or\/and depend- ants). The following should be considered. \\n Different choices: There may be a difference in the life choices made by women and girls, as opposed to men and boys. This is because women, men, girls and boys have different roles before, during and after conflicts, and they face different problems and expectations from society and their family. They may, as a result, have different prefer- ences for reintegration training and support. Some women and girls may wish to return to their original homes, while others may choose to follow male partners to a new loca- tion, including across international boundaries; \\n Different functions: Many women and girls participate in armed conflict in roles other than as armed combatants. These individuals, who may have participated as cooks, mes- sengers, informal health care providers, por- ters, sex slaves, etc., are often overlooked in the DDR process. Women and girls carry out these roles both through choice and, in the case of abductees and slaves, because they are forced to do so.", + "Paragraph": "Planners should develop a good understanding of the legal, political, economic, social and security context of the DDR programme and how it affects women, men, girls and boys differently, both in the armed forces and groups and in the receiving communities. In addition, planners should understand the different needs of women, men, girls and boys who participate in DDR processes according to their different roles during the conflict (i.e., armed ex-combatants, supporters, or\/and depend- ants). The following should be considered. \n Different choices: There may be a difference in the life choices made by women and girls, as opposed to men and boys. This is because women, men, girls and boys have different roles before, during and after conflicts, and they face different problems and expectations from society and their family. They may, as a result, have different prefer- ences for reintegration training and support. Some women and girls may wish to return to their original homes, while others may choose to follow male partners to a new loca- tion, including across international boundaries; \n Different functions: Many women and girls participate in armed conflict in roles other than as armed combatants. These individuals, who may have participated as cooks, mes- sengers, informal health care providers, por- ters, sex slaves, etc., are often overlooked in the DDR process. Women and girls carry out these roles both through choice and, in the case of abductees and slaves, because they are forced to do so.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -121602,14 +121602,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.2 Assessment phase", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Some women and girls may wish to return to their original homes, while others may choose to follow male partners to a new loca- tion, including across international boundaries; \\n Different functions: Many women and girls participate in armed conflict in roles other than as armed combatants.", + "Sentence": "Some women and girls may wish to return to their original homes, while others may choose to follow male partners to a new loca- tion, including across international boundaries; \n Different functions: Many women and girls participate in armed conflict in roles other than as armed combatants.", "newParagraph": "planner develop good understanding legal political economic social security context ddr programme affect woman men girl boy differently armed force group receiving community addition planner understand different need woman men girl boy participate ddr process according different role conflict ie armed excombatants supporter orand depend ant following considered n different choice may difference life choice made woman girl opposed men boy woman men girl boy different role conflict face different problem expectation society family may result different prefer ences reintegration training support woman girl may wish return original home others may choose follow male partner new loca tion including across international boundary n different function many woman girl participate armed conflict role armed combatant individual may participated cook me sengers informal health care provider por ters sex slave etc often overlooked ddr process woman girl carry role choice case abductees slave forced", "ProcessedSent": "woman girl may wish return original home others may choose follow male partner new loca tion including across international boundary n different function many woman girl participate armed conflict role armed combatant", "SentID": 6755 }, { "ParagraphID": 2038, - "Paragraph": "Planners should develop a good understanding of the legal, political, economic, social and security context of the DDR programme and how it affects women, men, girls and boys differently, both in the armed forces and groups and in the receiving communities. In addition, planners should understand the different needs of women, men, girls and boys who participate in DDR processes according to their different roles during the conflict (i.e., armed ex-combatants, supporters, or\/and depend- ants). The following should be considered. \\n Different choices: There may be a difference in the life choices made by women and girls, as opposed to men and boys. This is because women, men, girls and boys have different roles before, during and after conflicts, and they face different problems and expectations from society and their family. They may, as a result, have different prefer- ences for reintegration training and support. Some women and girls may wish to return to their original homes, while others may choose to follow male partners to a new loca- tion, including across international boundaries; \\n Different functions: Many women and girls participate in armed conflict in roles other than as armed combatants. These individuals, who may have participated as cooks, mes- sengers, informal health care providers, por- ters, sex slaves, etc., are often overlooked in the DDR process. Women and girls carry out these roles both through choice and, in the case of abductees and slaves, because they are forced to do so.", + "Paragraph": "Planners should develop a good understanding of the legal, political, economic, social and security context of the DDR programme and how it affects women, men, girls and boys differently, both in the armed forces and groups and in the receiving communities. In addition, planners should understand the different needs of women, men, girls and boys who participate in DDR processes according to their different roles during the conflict (i.e., armed ex-combatants, supporters, or\/and depend- ants). The following should be considered. \n Different choices: There may be a difference in the life choices made by women and girls, as opposed to men and boys. This is because women, men, girls and boys have different roles before, during and after conflicts, and they face different problems and expectations from society and their family. They may, as a result, have different prefer- ences for reintegration training and support. Some women and girls may wish to return to their original homes, while others may choose to follow male partners to a new loca- tion, including across international boundaries; \n Different functions: Many women and girls participate in armed conflict in roles other than as armed combatants. These individuals, who may have participated as cooks, mes- sengers, informal health care providers, por- ters, sex slaves, etc., are often overlooked in the DDR process. Women and girls carry out these roles both through choice and, in the case of abductees and slaves, because they are forced to do so.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -121627,7 +121627,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2038, - "Paragraph": "Planners should develop a good understanding of the legal, political, economic, social and security context of the DDR programme and how it affects women, men, girls and boys differently, both in the armed forces and groups and in the receiving communities. In addition, planners should understand the different needs of women, men, girls and boys who participate in DDR processes according to their different roles during the conflict (i.e., armed ex-combatants, supporters, or\/and depend- ants). The following should be considered. \\n Different choices: There may be a difference in the life choices made by women and girls, as opposed to men and boys. This is because women, men, girls and boys have different roles before, during and after conflicts, and they face different problems and expectations from society and their family. They may, as a result, have different prefer- ences for reintegration training and support. Some women and girls may wish to return to their original homes, while others may choose to follow male partners to a new loca- tion, including across international boundaries; \\n Different functions: Many women and girls participate in armed conflict in roles other than as armed combatants. These individuals, who may have participated as cooks, mes- sengers, informal health care providers, por- ters, sex slaves, etc., are often overlooked in the DDR process. Women and girls carry out these roles both through choice and, in the case of abductees and slaves, because they are forced to do so.", + "Paragraph": "Planners should develop a good understanding of the legal, political, economic, social and security context of the DDR programme and how it affects women, men, girls and boys differently, both in the armed forces and groups and in the receiving communities. In addition, planners should understand the different needs of women, men, girls and boys who participate in DDR processes according to their different roles during the conflict (i.e., armed ex-combatants, supporters, or\/and depend- ants). The following should be considered. \n Different choices: There may be a difference in the life choices made by women and girls, as opposed to men and boys. This is because women, men, girls and boys have different roles before, during and after conflicts, and they face different problems and expectations from society and their family. They may, as a result, have different prefer- ences for reintegration training and support. Some women and girls may wish to return to their original homes, while others may choose to follow male partners to a new loca- tion, including across international boundaries; \n Different functions: Many women and girls participate in armed conflict in roles other than as armed combatants. These individuals, who may have participated as cooks, mes- sengers, informal health care providers, por- ters, sex slaves, etc., are often overlooked in the DDR process. Women and girls carry out these roles both through choice and, in the case of abductees and slaves, because they are forced to do so.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -122185,7 +122185,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2055, - "Paragraph": "Box 3 Why are female supporters\/FAAFGs eligible for demobilization? \\n Female supporters and females associated with armed forces and groups shall enter DDR at the demobilization stage because, even if they are not as much of a security risk as combatants, the DDR process, by definition, will break down their social support systems through the demobilization of those on whom they have relied to make a living. If the aim of DDR is to provide broad-based community security, it cannot create insecurity for this group of women by ignoring their special needs. Even if the argument is made that women associated with armed forces and groups should be included in more broadly coordinated reintegration and recovery frameworks, it is important to remember that they will then miss out on specifically designed support to help them make the transition from a military to a civilian lifestyle. In addition, many of the programmes aimed at enabling communities to reinforce reintegration will not be in place early enough to deal with the immediate needs of this group of women.", + "Paragraph": "Box 3 Why are female supporters\/FAAFGs eligible for demobilization? \n Female supporters and females associated with armed forces and groups shall enter DDR at the demobilization stage because, even if they are not as much of a security risk as combatants, the DDR process, by definition, will break down their social support systems through the demobilization of those on whom they have relied to make a living. If the aim of DDR is to provide broad-based community security, it cannot create insecurity for this group of women by ignoring their special needs. Even if the argument is made that women associated with armed forces and groups should be included in more broadly coordinated reintegration and recovery frameworks, it is important to remember that they will then miss out on specifically designed support to help them make the transition from a military to a civilian lifestyle. In addition, many of the programmes aimed at enabling communities to reinforce reintegration will not be in place early enough to deal with the immediate needs of this group of women.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -122203,7 +122203,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2055, - "Paragraph": "Box 3 Why are female supporters\/FAAFGs eligible for demobilization? \\n Female supporters and females associated with armed forces and groups shall enter DDR at the demobilization stage because, even if they are not as much of a security risk as combatants, the DDR process, by definition, will break down their social support systems through the demobilization of those on whom they have relied to make a living. If the aim of DDR is to provide broad-based community security, it cannot create insecurity for this group of women by ignoring their special needs. Even if the argument is made that women associated with armed forces and groups should be included in more broadly coordinated reintegration and recovery frameworks, it is important to remember that they will then miss out on specifically designed support to help them make the transition from a military to a civilian lifestyle. In addition, many of the programmes aimed at enabling communities to reinforce reintegration will not be in place early enough to deal with the immediate needs of this group of women.", + "Paragraph": "Box 3 Why are female supporters\/FAAFGs eligible for demobilization? \n Female supporters and females associated with armed forces and groups shall enter DDR at the demobilization stage because, even if they are not as much of a security risk as combatants, the DDR process, by definition, will break down their social support systems through the demobilization of those on whom they have relied to make a living. If the aim of DDR is to provide broad-based community security, it cannot create insecurity for this group of women by ignoring their special needs. Even if the argument is made that women associated with armed forces and groups should be included in more broadly coordinated reintegration and recovery frameworks, it is important to remember that they will then miss out on specifically designed support to help them make the transition from a military to a civilian lifestyle. In addition, many of the programmes aimed at enabling communities to reinforce reintegration will not be in place early enough to deal with the immediate needs of this group of women.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -122214,14 +122214,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.3 Demobilization", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Female supporters and females associated with armed forces and groups shall enter DDR at the demobilization stage because, even if they are not as much of a security risk as combatants, the DDR process, by definition, will break down their social support systems through the demobilization of those on whom they have relied to make a living.", + "Sentence": "\n Female supporters and females associated with armed forces and groups shall enter DDR at the demobilization stage because, even if they are not as much of a security risk as combatants, the DDR process, by definition, will break down their social support systems through the demobilization of those on whom they have relied to make a living.", "newParagraph": "box 3 female supportersfaafgs eligible demobilization n female supporter female associated armed force group shall enter ddr demobilization stage even much security risk combatant ddr process definition break social support system demobilization relied make living aim ddr provide broadbased community security cannot create insecurity group woman ignoring special need even argument made woman associated armed force group included broadly coordinated reintegration recovery framework important remember miss specifically designed support help make transition military civilian lifestyle addition many programme aimed enabling community reinforce reintegration place early enough deal immediate need group woman", "ProcessedSent": "n female supporter female associated armed force group shall enter ddr demobilization stage even much security risk combatant ddr process definition break social support system demobilization relied make living", "SentID": 6789 }, { "ParagraphID": 2055, - "Paragraph": "Box 3 Why are female supporters\/FAAFGs eligible for demobilization? \\n Female supporters and females associated with armed forces and groups shall enter DDR at the demobilization stage because, even if they are not as much of a security risk as combatants, the DDR process, by definition, will break down their social support systems through the demobilization of those on whom they have relied to make a living. If the aim of DDR is to provide broad-based community security, it cannot create insecurity for this group of women by ignoring their special needs. Even if the argument is made that women associated with armed forces and groups should be included in more broadly coordinated reintegration and recovery frameworks, it is important to remember that they will then miss out on specifically designed support to help them make the transition from a military to a civilian lifestyle. In addition, many of the programmes aimed at enabling communities to reinforce reintegration will not be in place early enough to deal with the immediate needs of this group of women.", + "Paragraph": "Box 3 Why are female supporters\/FAAFGs eligible for demobilization? \n Female supporters and females associated with armed forces and groups shall enter DDR at the demobilization stage because, even if they are not as much of a security risk as combatants, the DDR process, by definition, will break down their social support systems through the demobilization of those on whom they have relied to make a living. If the aim of DDR is to provide broad-based community security, it cannot create insecurity for this group of women by ignoring their special needs. Even if the argument is made that women associated with armed forces and groups should be included in more broadly coordinated reintegration and recovery frameworks, it is important to remember that they will then miss out on specifically designed support to help them make the transition from a military to a civilian lifestyle. In addition, many of the programmes aimed at enabling communities to reinforce reintegration will not be in place early enough to deal with the immediate needs of this group of women.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -122239,7 +122239,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2055, - "Paragraph": "Box 3 Why are female supporters\/FAAFGs eligible for demobilization? \\n Female supporters and females associated with armed forces and groups shall enter DDR at the demobilization stage because, even if they are not as much of a security risk as combatants, the DDR process, by definition, will break down their social support systems through the demobilization of those on whom they have relied to make a living. If the aim of DDR is to provide broad-based community security, it cannot create insecurity for this group of women by ignoring their special needs. Even if the argument is made that women associated with armed forces and groups should be included in more broadly coordinated reintegration and recovery frameworks, it is important to remember that they will then miss out on specifically designed support to help them make the transition from a military to a civilian lifestyle. In addition, many of the programmes aimed at enabling communities to reinforce reintegration will not be in place early enough to deal with the immediate needs of this group of women.", + "Paragraph": "Box 3 Why are female supporters\/FAAFGs eligible for demobilization? \n Female supporters and females associated with armed forces and groups shall enter DDR at the demobilization stage because, even if they are not as much of a security risk as combatants, the DDR process, by definition, will break down their social support systems through the demobilization of those on whom they have relied to make a living. If the aim of DDR is to provide broad-based community security, it cannot create insecurity for this group of women by ignoring their special needs. Even if the argument is made that women associated with armed forces and groups should be included in more broadly coordinated reintegration and recovery frameworks, it is important to remember that they will then miss out on specifically designed support to help them make the transition from a military to a civilian lifestyle. In addition, many of the programmes aimed at enabling communities to reinforce reintegration will not be in place early enough to deal with the immediate needs of this group of women.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -122257,7 +122257,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2055, - "Paragraph": "Box 3 Why are female supporters\/FAAFGs eligible for demobilization? \\n Female supporters and females associated with armed forces and groups shall enter DDR at the demobilization stage because, even if they are not as much of a security risk as combatants, the DDR process, by definition, will break down their social support systems through the demobilization of those on whom they have relied to make a living. If the aim of DDR is to provide broad-based community security, it cannot create insecurity for this group of women by ignoring their special needs. Even if the argument is made that women associated with armed forces and groups should be included in more broadly coordinated reintegration and recovery frameworks, it is important to remember that they will then miss out on specifically designed support to help them make the transition from a military to a civilian lifestyle. In addition, many of the programmes aimed at enabling communities to reinforce reintegration will not be in place early enough to deal with the immediate needs of this group of women.", + "Paragraph": "Box 3 Why are female supporters\/FAAFGs eligible for demobilization? \n Female supporters and females associated with armed forces and groups shall enter DDR at the demobilization stage because, even if they are not as much of a security risk as combatants, the DDR process, by definition, will break down their social support systems through the demobilization of those on whom they have relied to make a living. If the aim of DDR is to provide broad-based community security, it cannot create insecurity for this group of women by ignoring their special needs. Even if the argument is made that women associated with armed forces and groups should be included in more broadly coordinated reintegration and recovery frameworks, it is important to remember that they will then miss out on specifically designed support to help them make the transition from a military to a civilian lifestyle. In addition, many of the programmes aimed at enabling communities to reinforce reintegration will not be in place early enough to deal with the immediate needs of this group of women.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -122455,7 +122455,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2061, - "Paragraph": "Box 4 Gender training in DDR \\n\\n Main topics of training \\n Gender mainstreaming and human rights \\n Sexual and gender-based violence \\n Gender roles and relations (before, during and after the conflict) \\n Gender identities \\n Gender issues in HIV\/AIDS and human trafficking \\n\\n Main participants \\n Ex-combatants, supporters, dependants (both male and female) \\n DDR programme staffs \\n Representatives of government \\n Women\u2019s groups and NGOs \\n Community leaders and traditional authorities", + "Paragraph": "Box 4 Gender training in DDR \n\n Main topics of training \n Gender mainstreaming and human rights \n Sexual and gender-based violence \n Gender roles and relations (before, during and after the conflict) \n Gender identities \n Gender issues in HIV\/AIDS and human trafficking \n\n Main participants \n Ex-combatants, supporters, dependants (both male and female) \n DDR programme staffs \n Representatives of government \n Women\u2019s groups and NGOs \n Community leaders and traditional authorities", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -122466,7 +122466,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.3 Demobilization", "Heading3": "6.3.1. Demobilization mandates, scope, institutional arrangements: Gender-aware interventions", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Box 4 Gender training in DDR \\n\\n Main topics of training \\n Gender mainstreaming and human rights \\n Sexual and gender-based violence \\n Gender roles and relations (before, during and after the conflict) \\n Gender identities \\n Gender issues in HIV\/AIDS and human trafficking \\n\\n Main participants \\n Ex-combatants, supporters, dependants (both male and female) \\n DDR programme staffs \\n Representatives of government \\n Women\u2019s groups and NGOs \\n Community leaders and traditional authorities", + "Sentence": "Box 4 Gender training in DDR \n\n Main topics of training \n Gender mainstreaming and human rights \n Sexual and gender-based violence \n Gender roles and relations (before, during and after the conflict) \n Gender identities \n Gender issues in HIV\/AIDS and human trafficking \n\n Main participants \n Ex-combatants, supporters, dependants (both male and female) \n DDR programme staffs \n Representatives of government \n Women\u2019s groups and NGOs \n Community leaders and traditional authorities", "newParagraph": "box 4 gender training ddr nn main topic training n gender mainstreaming human right n sexual genderbased violence n gender role relation conflict n gender identity n gender issue hivaids human trafficking nn main participant n excombatants supporter dependant male female n ddr programme staff n representative government n woman group ngo n community leader traditional authority", "ProcessedSent": "box 4 gender training ddr nn main topic training n gender mainstreaming human right n sexual genderbased violence n gender role relation conflict n gender identity n gender issue hivaids human trafficking nn main participant n excombatants supporter dependant male female n ddr programme staff n representative government n woman group ngo n community leader traditional authority", "SentID": 6803 @@ -123247,7 +123247,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2079, - "Paragraph": "Female ex-combatants are less likely to ask to participate in DDR than their male peers, for a variety of reasons: \\n a failure to adequately assess the number of women and girl combatants, supporters and dependants in the assessment phase, so that women and girls are neither expected nor catered for; \\n women and girls in many post-war contexts having poorer access to news sources such as radios and being less likely to be able to read than men; \\n the stigma during peacetime of being associated with an armed force or group; \\n the perception or fact that a weapon is required for participation in a DDR programme; \\n security concerns or a fear of exposure or re-exposure to sexual and gender-based violence; \\n in some cases, commanders deliberately holding girls back because they are considered essential workers and the most desirable sexual partners within the group.2 They may also hide women and girls who have been abducted, for fear of legal and social consequences. Measures should be put in place to ensure women know they have the right to leave, and the capacity to do so in safety.", + "Paragraph": "Female ex-combatants are less likely to ask to participate in DDR than their male peers, for a variety of reasons: \n a failure to adequately assess the number of women and girl combatants, supporters and dependants in the assessment phase, so that women and girls are neither expected nor catered for; \n women and girls in many post-war contexts having poorer access to news sources such as radios and being less likely to be able to read than men; \n the stigma during peacetime of being associated with an armed force or group; \n the perception or fact that a weapon is required for participation in a DDR programme; \n security concerns or a fear of exposure or re-exposure to sexual and gender-based violence; \n in some cases, commanders deliberately holding girls back because they are considered essential workers and the most desirable sexual partners within the group.2 They may also hide women and girls who have been abducted, for fear of legal and social consequences. Measures should be put in place to ensure women know they have the right to leave, and the capacity to do so in safety.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -123258,14 +123258,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.5 Assembly", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Female ex-combatants are less likely to ask to participate in DDR than their male peers, for a variety of reasons: \\n a failure to adequately assess the number of women and girl combatants, supporters and dependants in the assessment phase, so that women and girls are neither expected nor catered for; \\n women and girls in many post-war contexts having poorer access to news sources such as radios and being less likely to be able to read than men; \\n the stigma during peacetime of being associated with an armed force or group; \\n the perception or fact that a weapon is required for participation in a DDR programme; \\n security concerns or a fear of exposure or re-exposure to sexual and gender-based violence; \\n in some cases, commanders deliberately holding girls back because they are considered essential workers and the most desirable sexual partners within the group.2 They may also hide women and girls who have been abducted, for fear of legal and social consequences.", + "Sentence": "Female ex-combatants are less likely to ask to participate in DDR than their male peers, for a variety of reasons: \n a failure to adequately assess the number of women and girl combatants, supporters and dependants in the assessment phase, so that women and girls are neither expected nor catered for; \n women and girls in many post-war contexts having poorer access to news sources such as radios and being less likely to be able to read than men; \n the stigma during peacetime of being associated with an armed force or group; \n the perception or fact that a weapon is required for participation in a DDR programme; \n security concerns or a fear of exposure or re-exposure to sexual and gender-based violence; \n in some cases, commanders deliberately holding girls back because they are considered essential workers and the most desirable sexual partners within the group.2 They may also hide women and girls who have been abducted, for fear of legal and social consequences.", "newParagraph": "female excombatants le likely ask participate ddr male peer variety reason n failure adequately ass number woman girl combatant supporter dependant assessment phase woman girl neither expected catered n woman girl many postwar context poorer access news source radio le likely able read men n stigma peacetime associated armed force group n perception fact weapon required participation ddr programme n security concern fear exposure reexposure sexual genderbased violence n case commander deliberately holding girl back considered essential worker desirable sexual partner within group2 may also hide woman girl abducted fear legal social consequence measure put place ensure woman know right leave capacity safety", "ProcessedSent": "female excombatants le likely ask participate ddr male peer variety reason n failure adequately ass number woman girl combatant supporter dependant assessment phase woman girl neither expected catered n woman girl many postwar context poorer access news source radio le likely able read men n stigma peacetime associated armed force group n perception fact weapon required participation ddr programme n security concern fear exposure reexposure sexual genderbased violence n case commander deliberately holding girl back considered essential worker desirable sexual partner within group2 may also hide woman girl abducted fear legal social consequence", "SentID": 6847 }, { "ParagraphID": 2079, - "Paragraph": "Female ex-combatants are less likely to ask to participate in DDR than their male peers, for a variety of reasons: \\n a failure to adequately assess the number of women and girl combatants, supporters and dependants in the assessment phase, so that women and girls are neither expected nor catered for; \\n women and girls in many post-war contexts having poorer access to news sources such as radios and being less likely to be able to read than men; \\n the stigma during peacetime of being associated with an armed force or group; \\n the perception or fact that a weapon is required for participation in a DDR programme; \\n security concerns or a fear of exposure or re-exposure to sexual and gender-based violence; \\n in some cases, commanders deliberately holding girls back because they are considered essential workers and the most desirable sexual partners within the group.2 They may also hide women and girls who have been abducted, for fear of legal and social consequences. Measures should be put in place to ensure women know they have the right to leave, and the capacity to do so in safety.", + "Paragraph": "Female ex-combatants are less likely to ask to participate in DDR than their male peers, for a variety of reasons: \n a failure to adequately assess the number of women and girl combatants, supporters and dependants in the assessment phase, so that women and girls are neither expected nor catered for; \n women and girls in many post-war contexts having poorer access to news sources such as radios and being less likely to be able to read than men; \n the stigma during peacetime of being associated with an armed force or group; \n the perception or fact that a weapon is required for participation in a DDR programme; \n security concerns or a fear of exposure or re-exposure to sexual and gender-based violence; \n in some cases, commanders deliberately holding girls back because they are considered essential workers and the most desirable sexual partners within the group.2 They may also hide women and girls who have been abducted, for fear of legal and social consequences. Measures should be put in place to ensure women know they have the right to leave, and the capacity to do so in safety.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -123715,7 +123715,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2089, - "Paragraph": "Box 5 Gender-sensitive measures for interviews \\n Men and women should be interviewed separately. \\n They should be assured that all conversations are confidential. \\n Both sexes should be interviewed. \\n Female ex-combatants and supporters must be interviewed by female staff and female interpreters with gender training, if possible. \\n Questions must assess women\u2019s and men\u2019s different experiences, gender roles, relations and identities. \\n Victims of gender-based violence must be interviewed in a very sensitive way, and the interviewer should inform them of protection measures and the availability of counselling. If violence is disclosed, there must be some capacity for follow-up to protect the victim. If no such assistance is available, other methods should be developed to deal with gender-based violence.", + "Paragraph": "Box 5 Gender-sensitive measures for interviews \n Men and women should be interviewed separately. \n They should be assured that all conversations are confidential. \n Both sexes should be interviewed. \n Female ex-combatants and supporters must be interviewed by female staff and female interpreters with gender training, if possible. \n Questions must assess women\u2019s and men\u2019s different experiences, gender roles, relations and identities. \n Victims of gender-based violence must be interviewed in a very sensitive way, and the interviewer should inform them of protection measures and the availability of counselling. If violence is disclosed, there must be some capacity for follow-up to protect the victim. If no such assistance is available, other methods should be developed to deal with gender-based violence.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -123726,14 +123726,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.5 Assembly", "Heading3": "6.5.2. Assembly: Female-specific interventions", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Box 5 Gender-sensitive measures for interviews \\n Men and women should be interviewed separately.", + "Sentence": "Box 5 Gender-sensitive measures for interviews \n Men and women should be interviewed separately.", "newParagraph": "box 5 gendersensitive measure interview n men woman interviewed separately n assured conversation confidential n sex interviewed n female excombatants supporter must interviewed female staff female interpreter gender training possible n question must ass woman men different experience gender role relation identity n victim genderbased violence must interviewed sensitive way interviewer inform protection measure availability counselling violence disclosed must capacity followup protect victim assistance available method developed deal genderbased violence", "ProcessedSent": "box 5 gendersensitive measure interview n men woman interviewed separately", "SentID": 6873 }, { "ParagraphID": 2089, - "Paragraph": "Box 5 Gender-sensitive measures for interviews \\n Men and women should be interviewed separately. \\n They should be assured that all conversations are confidential. \\n Both sexes should be interviewed. \\n Female ex-combatants and supporters must be interviewed by female staff and female interpreters with gender training, if possible. \\n Questions must assess women\u2019s and men\u2019s different experiences, gender roles, relations and identities. \\n Victims of gender-based violence must be interviewed in a very sensitive way, and the interviewer should inform them of protection measures and the availability of counselling. If violence is disclosed, there must be some capacity for follow-up to protect the victim. If no such assistance is available, other methods should be developed to deal with gender-based violence.", + "Paragraph": "Box 5 Gender-sensitive measures for interviews \n Men and women should be interviewed separately. \n They should be assured that all conversations are confidential. \n Both sexes should be interviewed. \n Female ex-combatants and supporters must be interviewed by female staff and female interpreters with gender training, if possible. \n Questions must assess women\u2019s and men\u2019s different experiences, gender roles, relations and identities. \n Victims of gender-based violence must be interviewed in a very sensitive way, and the interviewer should inform them of protection measures and the availability of counselling. If violence is disclosed, there must be some capacity for follow-up to protect the victim. If no such assistance is available, other methods should be developed to deal with gender-based violence.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -123744,14 +123744,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.5 Assembly", "Heading3": "6.5.2. Assembly: Female-specific interventions", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n They should be assured that all conversations are confidential.", + "Sentence": "\n They should be assured that all conversations are confidential.", "newParagraph": "box 5 gendersensitive measure interview n men woman interviewed separately n assured conversation confidential n sex interviewed n female excombatants supporter must interviewed female staff female interpreter gender training possible n question must ass woman men different experience gender role relation identity n victim genderbased violence must interviewed sensitive way interviewer inform protection measure availability counselling violence disclosed must capacity followup protect victim assistance available method developed deal genderbased violence", "ProcessedSent": "n assured conversation confidential", "SentID": 6874 }, { "ParagraphID": 2089, - "Paragraph": "Box 5 Gender-sensitive measures for interviews \\n Men and women should be interviewed separately. \\n They should be assured that all conversations are confidential. \\n Both sexes should be interviewed. \\n Female ex-combatants and supporters must be interviewed by female staff and female interpreters with gender training, if possible. \\n Questions must assess women\u2019s and men\u2019s different experiences, gender roles, relations and identities. \\n Victims of gender-based violence must be interviewed in a very sensitive way, and the interviewer should inform them of protection measures and the availability of counselling. If violence is disclosed, there must be some capacity for follow-up to protect the victim. If no such assistance is available, other methods should be developed to deal with gender-based violence.", + "Paragraph": "Box 5 Gender-sensitive measures for interviews \n Men and women should be interviewed separately. \n They should be assured that all conversations are confidential. \n Both sexes should be interviewed. \n Female ex-combatants and supporters must be interviewed by female staff and female interpreters with gender training, if possible. \n Questions must assess women\u2019s and men\u2019s different experiences, gender roles, relations and identities. \n Victims of gender-based violence must be interviewed in a very sensitive way, and the interviewer should inform them of protection measures and the availability of counselling. If violence is disclosed, there must be some capacity for follow-up to protect the victim. If no such assistance is available, other methods should be developed to deal with gender-based violence.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -123762,14 +123762,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.5 Assembly", "Heading3": "6.5.2. Assembly: Female-specific interventions", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Both sexes should be interviewed.", + "Sentence": "\n Both sexes should be interviewed.", "newParagraph": "box 5 gendersensitive measure interview n men woman interviewed separately n assured conversation confidential n sex interviewed n female excombatants supporter must interviewed female staff female interpreter gender training possible n question must ass woman men different experience gender role relation identity n victim genderbased violence must interviewed sensitive way interviewer inform protection measure availability counselling violence disclosed must capacity followup protect victim assistance available method developed deal genderbased violence", "ProcessedSent": "n sex interviewed", "SentID": 6875 }, { "ParagraphID": 2089, - "Paragraph": "Box 5 Gender-sensitive measures for interviews \\n Men and women should be interviewed separately. \\n They should be assured that all conversations are confidential. \\n Both sexes should be interviewed. \\n Female ex-combatants and supporters must be interviewed by female staff and female interpreters with gender training, if possible. \\n Questions must assess women\u2019s and men\u2019s different experiences, gender roles, relations and identities. \\n Victims of gender-based violence must be interviewed in a very sensitive way, and the interviewer should inform them of protection measures and the availability of counselling. If violence is disclosed, there must be some capacity for follow-up to protect the victim. If no such assistance is available, other methods should be developed to deal with gender-based violence.", + "Paragraph": "Box 5 Gender-sensitive measures for interviews \n Men and women should be interviewed separately. \n They should be assured that all conversations are confidential. \n Both sexes should be interviewed. \n Female ex-combatants and supporters must be interviewed by female staff and female interpreters with gender training, if possible. \n Questions must assess women\u2019s and men\u2019s different experiences, gender roles, relations and identities. \n Victims of gender-based violence must be interviewed in a very sensitive way, and the interviewer should inform them of protection measures and the availability of counselling. If violence is disclosed, there must be some capacity for follow-up to protect the victim. If no such assistance is available, other methods should be developed to deal with gender-based violence.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -123780,14 +123780,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.5 Assembly", "Heading3": "6.5.2. Assembly: Female-specific interventions", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Female ex-combatants and supporters must be interviewed by female staff and female interpreters with gender training, if possible.", + "Sentence": "\n Female ex-combatants and supporters must be interviewed by female staff and female interpreters with gender training, if possible.", "newParagraph": "box 5 gendersensitive measure interview n men woman interviewed separately n assured conversation confidential n sex interviewed n female excombatants supporter must interviewed female staff female interpreter gender training possible n question must ass woman men different experience gender role relation identity n victim genderbased violence must interviewed sensitive way interviewer inform protection measure availability counselling violence disclosed must capacity followup protect victim assistance available method developed deal genderbased violence", "ProcessedSent": "n female excombatants supporter must interviewed female staff female interpreter gender training possible", "SentID": 6876 }, { "ParagraphID": 2089, - "Paragraph": "Box 5 Gender-sensitive measures for interviews \\n Men and women should be interviewed separately. \\n They should be assured that all conversations are confidential. \\n Both sexes should be interviewed. \\n Female ex-combatants and supporters must be interviewed by female staff and female interpreters with gender training, if possible. \\n Questions must assess women\u2019s and men\u2019s different experiences, gender roles, relations and identities. \\n Victims of gender-based violence must be interviewed in a very sensitive way, and the interviewer should inform them of protection measures and the availability of counselling. If violence is disclosed, there must be some capacity for follow-up to protect the victim. If no such assistance is available, other methods should be developed to deal with gender-based violence.", + "Paragraph": "Box 5 Gender-sensitive measures for interviews \n Men and women should be interviewed separately. \n They should be assured that all conversations are confidential. \n Both sexes should be interviewed. \n Female ex-combatants and supporters must be interviewed by female staff and female interpreters with gender training, if possible. \n Questions must assess women\u2019s and men\u2019s different experiences, gender roles, relations and identities. \n Victims of gender-based violence must be interviewed in a very sensitive way, and the interviewer should inform them of protection measures and the availability of counselling. If violence is disclosed, there must be some capacity for follow-up to protect the victim. If no such assistance is available, other methods should be developed to deal with gender-based violence.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -123798,14 +123798,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.5 Assembly", "Heading3": "6.5.2. Assembly: Female-specific interventions", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Questions must assess women\u2019s and men\u2019s different experiences, gender roles, relations and identities.", + "Sentence": "\n Questions must assess women\u2019s and men\u2019s different experiences, gender roles, relations and identities.", "newParagraph": "box 5 gendersensitive measure interview n men woman interviewed separately n assured conversation confidential n sex interviewed n female excombatants supporter must interviewed female staff female interpreter gender training possible n question must ass woman men different experience gender role relation identity n victim genderbased violence must interviewed sensitive way interviewer inform protection measure availability counselling violence disclosed must capacity followup protect victim assistance available method developed deal genderbased violence", "ProcessedSent": "n question must ass woman men different experience gender role relation identity", "SentID": 6877 }, { "ParagraphID": 2089, - "Paragraph": "Box 5 Gender-sensitive measures for interviews \\n Men and women should be interviewed separately. \\n They should be assured that all conversations are confidential. \\n Both sexes should be interviewed. \\n Female ex-combatants and supporters must be interviewed by female staff and female interpreters with gender training, if possible. \\n Questions must assess women\u2019s and men\u2019s different experiences, gender roles, relations and identities. \\n Victims of gender-based violence must be interviewed in a very sensitive way, and the interviewer should inform them of protection measures and the availability of counselling. If violence is disclosed, there must be some capacity for follow-up to protect the victim. If no such assistance is available, other methods should be developed to deal with gender-based violence.", + "Paragraph": "Box 5 Gender-sensitive measures for interviews \n Men and women should be interviewed separately. \n They should be assured that all conversations are confidential. \n Both sexes should be interviewed. \n Female ex-combatants and supporters must be interviewed by female staff and female interpreters with gender training, if possible. \n Questions must assess women\u2019s and men\u2019s different experiences, gender roles, relations and identities. \n Victims of gender-based violence must be interviewed in a very sensitive way, and the interviewer should inform them of protection measures and the availability of counselling. If violence is disclosed, there must be some capacity for follow-up to protect the victim. If no such assistance is available, other methods should be developed to deal with gender-based violence.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -123816,14 +123816,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.5 Assembly", "Heading3": "6.5.2. Assembly: Female-specific interventions", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Victims of gender-based violence must be interviewed in a very sensitive way, and the interviewer should inform them of protection measures and the availability of counselling.", + "Sentence": "\n Victims of gender-based violence must be interviewed in a very sensitive way, and the interviewer should inform them of protection measures and the availability of counselling.", "newParagraph": "box 5 gendersensitive measure interview n men woman interviewed separately n assured conversation confidential n sex interviewed n female excombatants supporter must interviewed female staff female interpreter gender training possible n question must ass woman men different experience gender role relation identity n victim genderbased violence must interviewed sensitive way interviewer inform protection measure availability counselling violence disclosed must capacity followup protect victim assistance available method developed deal genderbased violence", "ProcessedSent": "n victim genderbased violence must interviewed sensitive way interviewer inform protection measure availability counselling", "SentID": 6878 }, { "ParagraphID": 2089, - "Paragraph": "Box 5 Gender-sensitive measures for interviews \\n Men and women should be interviewed separately. \\n They should be assured that all conversations are confidential. \\n Both sexes should be interviewed. \\n Female ex-combatants and supporters must be interviewed by female staff and female interpreters with gender training, if possible. \\n Questions must assess women\u2019s and men\u2019s different experiences, gender roles, relations and identities. \\n Victims of gender-based violence must be interviewed in a very sensitive way, and the interviewer should inform them of protection measures and the availability of counselling. If violence is disclosed, there must be some capacity for follow-up to protect the victim. If no such assistance is available, other methods should be developed to deal with gender-based violence.", + "Paragraph": "Box 5 Gender-sensitive measures for interviews \n Men and women should be interviewed separately. \n They should be assured that all conversations are confidential. \n Both sexes should be interviewed. \n Female ex-combatants and supporters must be interviewed by female staff and female interpreters with gender training, if possible. \n Questions must assess women\u2019s and men\u2019s different experiences, gender roles, relations and identities. \n Victims of gender-based violence must be interviewed in a very sensitive way, and the interviewer should inform them of protection measures and the availability of counselling. If violence is disclosed, there must be some capacity for follow-up to protect the victim. If no such assistance is available, other methods should be developed to deal with gender-based violence.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -123841,7 +123841,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2089, - "Paragraph": "Box 5 Gender-sensitive measures for interviews \\n Men and women should be interviewed separately. \\n They should be assured that all conversations are confidential. \\n Both sexes should be interviewed. \\n Female ex-combatants and supporters must be interviewed by female staff and female interpreters with gender training, if possible. \\n Questions must assess women\u2019s and men\u2019s different experiences, gender roles, relations and identities. \\n Victims of gender-based violence must be interviewed in a very sensitive way, and the interviewer should inform them of protection measures and the availability of counselling. If violence is disclosed, there must be some capacity for follow-up to protect the victim. If no such assistance is available, other methods should be developed to deal with gender-based violence.", + "Paragraph": "Box 5 Gender-sensitive measures for interviews \n Men and women should be interviewed separately. \n They should be assured that all conversations are confidential. \n Both sexes should be interviewed. \n Female ex-combatants and supporters must be interviewed by female staff and female interpreters with gender training, if possible. \n Questions must assess women\u2019s and men\u2019s different experiences, gender roles, relations and identities. \n Victims of gender-based violence must be interviewed in a very sensitive way, and the interviewer should inform them of protection measures and the availability of counselling. If violence is disclosed, there must be some capacity for follow-up to protect the victim. If no such assistance is available, other methods should be developed to deal with gender-based violence.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -125209,7 +125209,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2129, - "Paragraph": "Box 6 Example of factors that may contribute to women\u2019s social reintegration \\n\\n The level of women\u2019s participation in decision-making: \\n in the household \\n at the community level \\n at the national and government levels \\n\\n The public image and self-image of women and men \\n\\n The public and private\/domestic roles of women and men* \\n the level of diversity and flexibility in these gender roles \\n inflexible gender roles \\n\\n The public perception of gender-based violence, including rape \\n\\n Organizational and other capacity of women\u2019s NGOs and women\u2019s ministries \\n\\n Social networks of local women\u2019s groups, female community leaders and church leaders \\n\\n Media coverage of women and gender issues \\n * Note: An assessment of gender roles could help women and men to think about: \\n\\n what women and men can and cannot do in their society \\n\\n what kinds of expectations the community has of women and men \\n\\n what barriers women and men face if they want to perform non-traditional roles \\n\\n in what area(s) women and men could transform their gender roles \\n\\n how women\u2019s and men\u2019s roles have changed during conflict", + "Paragraph": "Box 6 Example of factors that may contribute to women\u2019s social reintegration \n\n The level of women\u2019s participation in decision-making: \n in the household \n at the community level \n at the national and government levels \n\n The public image and self-image of women and men \n\n The public and private\/domestic roles of women and men* \n the level of diversity and flexibility in these gender roles \n inflexible gender roles \n\n The public perception of gender-based violence, including rape \n\n Organizational and other capacity of women\u2019s NGOs and women\u2019s ministries \n\n Social networks of local women\u2019s groups, female community leaders and church leaders \n\n Media coverage of women and gender issues \n * Note: An assessment of gender roles could help women and men to think about: \n\n what women and men can and cannot do in their society \n\n what kinds of expectations the community has of women and men \n\n what barriers women and men face if they want to perform non-traditional roles \n\n in what area(s) women and men could transform their gender roles \n\n how women\u2019s and men\u2019s roles have changed during conflict", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -125220,7 +125220,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.9. Social reintegration", "Heading3": "6.9.2. Social reintegration: Female-specific interventions", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Box 6 Example of factors that may contribute to women\u2019s social reintegration \\n\\n The level of women\u2019s participation in decision-making: \\n in the household \\n at the community level \\n at the national and government levels \\n\\n The public image and self-image of women and men \\n\\n The public and private\/domestic roles of women and men* \\n the level of diversity and flexibility in these gender roles \\n inflexible gender roles \\n\\n The public perception of gender-based violence, including rape \\n\\n Organizational and other capacity of women\u2019s NGOs and women\u2019s ministries \\n\\n Social networks of local women\u2019s groups, female community leaders and church leaders \\n\\n Media coverage of women and gender issues \\n * Note: An assessment of gender roles could help women and men to think about: \\n\\n what women and men can and cannot do in their society \\n\\n what kinds of expectations the community has of women and men \\n\\n what barriers women and men face if they want to perform non-traditional roles \\n\\n in what area(s) women and men could transform their gender roles \\n\\n how women\u2019s and men\u2019s roles have changed during conflict", + "Sentence": "Box 6 Example of factors that may contribute to women\u2019s social reintegration \n\n The level of women\u2019s participation in decision-making: \n in the household \n at the community level \n at the national and government levels \n\n The public image and self-image of women and men \n\n The public and private\/domestic roles of women and men* \n the level of diversity and flexibility in these gender roles \n inflexible gender roles \n\n The public perception of gender-based violence, including rape \n\n Organizational and other capacity of women\u2019s NGOs and women\u2019s ministries \n\n Social networks of local women\u2019s groups, female community leaders and church leaders \n\n Media coverage of women and gender issues \n * Note: An assessment of gender roles could help women and men to think about: \n\n what women and men can and cannot do in their society \n\n what kinds of expectations the community has of women and men \n\n what barriers women and men face if they want to perform non-traditional roles \n\n in what area(s) women and men could transform their gender roles \n\n how women\u2019s and men\u2019s roles have changed during conflict", "newParagraph": "box 6 example factor may contribute woman social reintegration nn level woman participation decisionmaking n household n community level n national government level nn public image selfimage woman men nn public privatedomestic role woman men n level diversity flexibility gender role n inflexible gender role nn public perception genderbased violence including rape nn organizational capacity woman ngo woman ministry nn social network local woman group female community leader church leader nn medium coverage woman gender issue n note assessment gender role could help woman men think nn woman men cannot society nn kind expectation community woman men nn barrier woman men face want perform nontraditional role nn area woman men could transform gender role nn woman men role changed conflict", "ProcessedSent": "box 6 example factor may contribute woman social reintegration nn level woman participation decisionmaking n household n community level n national government level nn public image selfimage woman men nn public privatedomestic role woman men n level diversity flexibility gender role n inflexible gender role nn public perception genderbased violence including rape nn organizational capacity woman ngo woman ministry nn social network local woman group female community leader church leader nn medium coverage woman gender issue n note assessment gender role could help woman men think nn woman men cannot society nn kind expectation community woman men nn barrier woman men face want perform nontraditional role nn area woman men could transform gender role nn woman men role changed conflict", "SentID": 6956 @@ -126415,7 +126415,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2153, - "Paragraph": "Gender-aware policies: Policies that utilize gender analysis in their formulation and design, and recognize gender differences in terms of needs, interests, priorities, power and roles. They recognize further that both men and women are active development actors for their community. Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \\n Gender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in a society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs. \\n Gender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations. These policies use knowledge of gender difference to respond to the practical gender needs of women or men. \\n Gender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs. These policies can target both sexes together, or separately. Interventions may focus on women\u2019s and\/or men\u2019s practical gender needs, but with the objective of creating a conducive environment in which women or men can empower themselves.11", + "Paragraph": "Gender-aware policies: Policies that utilize gender analysis in their formulation and design, and recognize gender differences in terms of needs, interests, priorities, power and roles. They recognize further that both men and women are active development actors for their community. Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \n Gender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in a society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs. \n Gender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations. These policies use knowledge of gender difference to respond to the practical gender needs of women or men. \n Gender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs. These policies can target both sexes together, or separately. Interventions may focus on women\u2019s and\/or men\u2019s practical gender needs, but with the objective of creating a conducive environment in which women or men can empower themselves.11", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -126433,7 +126433,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2153, - "Paragraph": "Gender-aware policies: Policies that utilize gender analysis in their formulation and design, and recognize gender differences in terms of needs, interests, priorities, power and roles. They recognize further that both men and women are active development actors for their community. Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \\n Gender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in a society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs. \\n Gender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations. These policies use knowledge of gender difference to respond to the practical gender needs of women or men. \\n Gender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs. These policies can target both sexes together, or separately. Interventions may focus on women\u2019s and\/or men\u2019s practical gender needs, but with the objective of creating a conducive environment in which women or men can empower themselves.11", + "Paragraph": "Gender-aware policies: Policies that utilize gender analysis in their formulation and design, and recognize gender differences in terms of needs, interests, priorities, power and roles. They recognize further that both men and women are active development actors for their community. Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \n Gender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in a society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs. \n Gender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations. These policies use knowledge of gender difference to respond to the practical gender needs of women or men. \n Gender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs. These policies can target both sexes together, or separately. Interventions may focus on women\u2019s and\/or men\u2019s practical gender needs, but with the objective of creating a conducive environment in which women or men can empower themselves.11", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -126451,7 +126451,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2153, - "Paragraph": "Gender-aware policies: Policies that utilize gender analysis in their formulation and design, and recognize gender differences in terms of needs, interests, priorities, power and roles. They recognize further that both men and women are active development actors for their community. Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \\n Gender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in a society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs. \\n Gender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations. These policies use knowledge of gender difference to respond to the practical gender needs of women or men. \\n Gender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs. These policies can target both sexes together, or separately. Interventions may focus on women\u2019s and\/or men\u2019s practical gender needs, but with the objective of creating a conducive environment in which women or men can empower themselves.11", + "Paragraph": "Gender-aware policies: Policies that utilize gender analysis in their formulation and design, and recognize gender differences in terms of needs, interests, priorities, power and roles. They recognize further that both men and women are active development actors for their community. Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \n Gender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in a society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs. \n Gender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations. These policies use knowledge of gender difference to respond to the practical gender needs of women or men. \n Gender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs. These policies can target both sexes together, or separately. Interventions may focus on women\u2019s and\/or men\u2019s practical gender needs, but with the objective of creating a conducive environment in which women or men can empower themselves.11", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -126462,14 +126462,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \\n Gender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in a society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs.", + "Sentence": "Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \n Gender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in a society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs.", "newParagraph": "genderaware policy policy utilize gender analysis formulation design recognize gender difference term need interest priority power role recognize men woman active development actor community genderaware policy divided following three policy n genderneutral policy use knowledge gender difference society reduce bias development work order enable woman men meet practical gender need n genderspecific policy based understanding existing gendered division resource responsibility gender power relation policy use knowledge gender difference respond practical gender need woman men n gendertransformative policy consist intervention attempt transform existing distribution power resource create balanced relationship among woman men girl boy responding strategic gender need policy target sex together separately intervention may focus woman andor men practical gender need objective creating conducive environment woman men empower themselves11", "ProcessedSent": "genderaware policy divided following three policy n genderneutral policy use knowledge gender difference society reduce bias development work order enable woman men meet practical gender need", "SentID": 7025 }, { "ParagraphID": 2153, - "Paragraph": "Gender-aware policies: Policies that utilize gender analysis in their formulation and design, and recognize gender differences in terms of needs, interests, priorities, power and roles. They recognize further that both men and women are active development actors for their community. Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \\n Gender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in a society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs. \\n Gender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations. These policies use knowledge of gender difference to respond to the practical gender needs of women or men. \\n Gender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs. These policies can target both sexes together, or separately. Interventions may focus on women\u2019s and\/or men\u2019s practical gender needs, but with the objective of creating a conducive environment in which women or men can empower themselves.11", + "Paragraph": "Gender-aware policies: Policies that utilize gender analysis in their formulation and design, and recognize gender differences in terms of needs, interests, priorities, power and roles. They recognize further that both men and women are active development actors for their community. Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \n Gender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in a society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs. \n Gender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations. These policies use knowledge of gender difference to respond to the practical gender needs of women or men. \n Gender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs. These policies can target both sexes together, or separately. Interventions may focus on women\u2019s and\/or men\u2019s practical gender needs, but with the objective of creating a conducive environment in which women or men can empower themselves.11", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -126480,14 +126480,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Gender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations.", + "Sentence": "\n Gender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations.", "newParagraph": "genderaware policy policy utilize gender analysis formulation design recognize gender difference term need interest priority power role recognize men woman active development actor community genderaware policy divided following three policy n genderneutral policy use knowledge gender difference society reduce bias development work order enable woman men meet practical gender need n genderspecific policy based understanding existing gendered division resource responsibility gender power relation policy use knowledge gender difference respond practical gender need woman men n gendertransformative policy consist intervention attempt transform existing distribution power resource create balanced relationship among woman men girl boy responding strategic gender need policy target sex together separately intervention may focus woman andor men practical gender need objective creating conducive environment woman men empower themselves11", "ProcessedSent": "n genderspecific policy based understanding existing gendered division resource responsibility gender power relation", "SentID": 7026 }, { "ParagraphID": 2153, - "Paragraph": "Gender-aware policies: Policies that utilize gender analysis in their formulation and design, and recognize gender differences in terms of needs, interests, priorities, power and roles. They recognize further that both men and women are active development actors for their community. Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \\n Gender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in a society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs. \\n Gender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations. These policies use knowledge of gender difference to respond to the practical gender needs of women or men. \\n Gender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs. These policies can target both sexes together, or separately. Interventions may focus on women\u2019s and\/or men\u2019s practical gender needs, but with the objective of creating a conducive environment in which women or men can empower themselves.11", + "Paragraph": "Gender-aware policies: Policies that utilize gender analysis in their formulation and design, and recognize gender differences in terms of needs, interests, priorities, power and roles. They recognize further that both men and women are active development actors for their community. Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \n Gender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in a society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs. \n Gender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations. These policies use knowledge of gender difference to respond to the practical gender needs of women or men. \n Gender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs. These policies can target both sexes together, or separately. Interventions may focus on women\u2019s and\/or men\u2019s practical gender needs, but with the objective of creating a conducive environment in which women or men can empower themselves.11", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -126505,7 +126505,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2153, - "Paragraph": "Gender-aware policies: Policies that utilize gender analysis in their formulation and design, and recognize gender differences in terms of needs, interests, priorities, power and roles. They recognize further that both men and women are active development actors for their community. Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \\n Gender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in a society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs. \\n Gender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations. These policies use knowledge of gender difference to respond to the practical gender needs of women or men. \\n Gender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs. These policies can target both sexes together, or separately. Interventions may focus on women\u2019s and\/or men\u2019s practical gender needs, but with the objective of creating a conducive environment in which women or men can empower themselves.11", + "Paragraph": "Gender-aware policies: Policies that utilize gender analysis in their formulation and design, and recognize gender differences in terms of needs, interests, priorities, power and roles. They recognize further that both men and women are active development actors for their community. Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \n Gender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in a society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs. \n Gender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations. These policies use knowledge of gender difference to respond to the practical gender needs of women or men. \n Gender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs. These policies can target both sexes together, or separately. Interventions may focus on women\u2019s and\/or men\u2019s practical gender needs, but with the objective of creating a conducive environment in which women or men can empower themselves.11", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -126516,14 +126516,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Gender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs.", + "Sentence": "\n Gender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs.", "newParagraph": "genderaware policy policy utilize gender analysis formulation design recognize gender difference term need interest priority power role recognize men woman active development actor community genderaware policy divided following three policy n genderneutral policy use knowledge gender difference society reduce bias development work order enable woman men meet practical gender need n genderspecific policy based understanding existing gendered division resource responsibility gender power relation policy use knowledge gender difference respond practical gender need woman men n gendertransformative policy consist intervention attempt transform existing distribution power resource create balanced relationship among woman men girl boy responding strategic gender need policy target sex together separately intervention may focus woman andor men practical gender need objective creating conducive environment woman men empower themselves11", "ProcessedSent": "n gendertransformative policy consist intervention attempt transform existing distribution power resource create balanced relationship among woman men girl boy responding strategic gender need", "SentID": 7028 }, { "ParagraphID": 2153, - "Paragraph": "Gender-aware policies: Policies that utilize gender analysis in their formulation and design, and recognize gender differences in terms of needs, interests, priorities, power and roles. They recognize further that both men and women are active development actors for their community. Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \\n Gender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in a society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs. \\n Gender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations. These policies use knowledge of gender difference to respond to the practical gender needs of women or men. \\n Gender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs. These policies can target both sexes together, or separately. Interventions may focus on women\u2019s and\/or men\u2019s practical gender needs, but with the objective of creating a conducive environment in which women or men can empower themselves.11", + "Paragraph": "Gender-aware policies: Policies that utilize gender analysis in their formulation and design, and recognize gender differences in terms of needs, interests, priorities, power and roles. They recognize further that both men and women are active development actors for their community. Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \n Gender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in a society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs. \n Gender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations. These policies use knowledge of gender difference to respond to the practical gender needs of women or men. \n Gender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs. These policies can target both sexes together, or separately. Interventions may focus on women\u2019s and\/or men\u2019s practical gender needs, but with the objective of creating a conducive environment in which women or men can empower themselves.11", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -126541,7 +126541,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2153, - "Paragraph": "Gender-aware policies: Policies that utilize gender analysis in their formulation and design, and recognize gender differences in terms of needs, interests, priorities, power and roles. They recognize further that both men and women are active development actors for their community. Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \\n Gender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in a society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs. \\n Gender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations. These policies use knowledge of gender difference to respond to the practical gender needs of women or men. \\n Gender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs. These policies can target both sexes together, or separately. Interventions may focus on women\u2019s and\/or men\u2019s practical gender needs, but with the objective of creating a conducive environment in which women or men can empower themselves.11", + "Paragraph": "Gender-aware policies: Policies that utilize gender analysis in their formulation and design, and recognize gender differences in terms of needs, interests, priorities, power and roles. They recognize further that both men and women are active development actors for their community. Gender-aware policies can be further divided into the following three policies: \n Gender-neutral policies use the knowledge of gender differences in a society to reduce biases in development work in order to enable both women and men to meet their practical gender needs. \n Gender-specific policies are based on an understanding of the existing gendered division of resources and responsibilities and gender power relations. These policies use knowledge of gender difference to respond to the practical gender needs of women or men. \n Gender-transformative policies consist of interventions that attempt to transform existing distributions of power and resources to create a more balanced relationship among women, men, girls and boys by responding to their strategic gender needs. These policies can target both sexes together, or separately. Interventions may focus on women\u2019s and\/or men\u2019s practical gender needs, but with the objective of creating a conducive environment in which women or men can empower themselves.11", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -126739,7 +126739,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2161, - "Paragraph": "Violence against women: Defined by the UN General Assembly in the 1993 Declaration on the Elimination of Violence Against Women as \u201cany act of gender-based violence that results in, or is likely to result in physical, sexual or psychological harm or suffering to women, including threats of such acts, coercion or arbitrary deprivation of liberty, whether occurring in public or in private. Violence against women shall be understood to encompass, but not be limited to, the following: \\n Physical, sexual and psychological violence occurring in the family, including batter- ing, sexual abuse of female children in the household, dowry-related violence, marital rape, female genital mutilation and other traditional practices harmful to women, non- spousal violence and violence related to exploitation; \\n Physical, sexual and psychological violence occurring within the general community, including rape, sexual abuse, sexual harassment and intimidation at work, in educa- tional institutions and elsewhere, trafficking in women and forced prostitution; \\n Physical, sexual and psychological violence perpetrated or condoned by the State, wherever it occurs.\u201d18", + "Paragraph": "Violence against women: Defined by the UN General Assembly in the 1993 Declaration on the Elimination of Violence Against Women as \u201cany act of gender-based violence that results in, or is likely to result in physical, sexual or psychological harm or suffering to women, including threats of such acts, coercion or arbitrary deprivation of liberty, whether occurring in public or in private. Violence against women shall be understood to encompass, but not be limited to, the following: \n Physical, sexual and psychological violence occurring in the family, including batter- ing, sexual abuse of female children in the household, dowry-related violence, marital rape, female genital mutilation and other traditional practices harmful to women, non- spousal violence and violence related to exploitation; \n Physical, sexual and psychological violence occurring within the general community, including rape, sexual abuse, sexual harassment and intimidation at work, in educa- tional institutions and elsewhere, trafficking in women and forced prostitution; \n Physical, sexual and psychological violence perpetrated or condoned by the State, wherever it occurs.\u201d18", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -126757,7 +126757,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2161, - "Paragraph": "Violence against women: Defined by the UN General Assembly in the 1993 Declaration on the Elimination of Violence Against Women as \u201cany act of gender-based violence that results in, or is likely to result in physical, sexual or psychological harm or suffering to women, including threats of such acts, coercion or arbitrary deprivation of liberty, whether occurring in public or in private. Violence against women shall be understood to encompass, but not be limited to, the following: \\n Physical, sexual and psychological violence occurring in the family, including batter- ing, sexual abuse of female children in the household, dowry-related violence, marital rape, female genital mutilation and other traditional practices harmful to women, non- spousal violence and violence related to exploitation; \\n Physical, sexual and psychological violence occurring within the general community, including rape, sexual abuse, sexual harassment and intimidation at work, in educa- tional institutions and elsewhere, trafficking in women and forced prostitution; \\n Physical, sexual and psychological violence perpetrated or condoned by the State, wherever it occurs.\u201d18", + "Paragraph": "Violence against women: Defined by the UN General Assembly in the 1993 Declaration on the Elimination of Violence Against Women as \u201cany act of gender-based violence that results in, or is likely to result in physical, sexual or psychological harm or suffering to women, including threats of such acts, coercion or arbitrary deprivation of liberty, whether occurring in public or in private. Violence against women shall be understood to encompass, but not be limited to, the following: \n Physical, sexual and psychological violence occurring in the family, including batter- ing, sexual abuse of female children in the household, dowry-related violence, marital rape, female genital mutilation and other traditional practices harmful to women, non- spousal violence and violence related to exploitation; \n Physical, sexual and psychological violence occurring within the general community, including rape, sexual abuse, sexual harassment and intimidation at work, in educa- tional institutions and elsewhere, trafficking in women and forced prostitution; \n Physical, sexual and psychological violence perpetrated or condoned by the State, wherever it occurs.\u201d18", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -126768,14 +126768,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Violence against women shall be understood to encompass, but not be limited to, the following: \\n Physical, sexual and psychological violence occurring in the family, including batter- ing, sexual abuse of female children in the household, dowry-related violence, marital rape, female genital mutilation and other traditional practices harmful to women, non- spousal violence and violence related to exploitation; \\n Physical, sexual and psychological violence occurring within the general community, including rape, sexual abuse, sexual harassment and intimidation at work, in educa- tional institutions and elsewhere, trafficking in women and forced prostitution; \\n Physical, sexual and psychological violence perpetrated or condoned by the State, wherever it occurs.\u201d18", + "Sentence": "Violence against women shall be understood to encompass, but not be limited to, the following: \n Physical, sexual and psychological violence occurring in the family, including batter- ing, sexual abuse of female children in the household, dowry-related violence, marital rape, female genital mutilation and other traditional practices harmful to women, non- spousal violence and violence related to exploitation; \n Physical, sexual and psychological violence occurring within the general community, including rape, sexual abuse, sexual harassment and intimidation at work, in educa- tional institutions and elsewhere, trafficking in women and forced prostitution; \n Physical, sexual and psychological violence perpetrated or condoned by the State, wherever it occurs.\u201d18", "newParagraph": "violence woman defined un general assembly 1993 declaration elimination violence woman act genderbased violence result likely result physical sexual psychological harm suffering woman including threat act coercion arbitrary deprivation liberty whether occurring public private violence woman shall understood encompass limited following n physical sexual psychological violence occurring family including batter ing sexual abuse female child household dowryrelated violence marital rape female genital mutilation traditional practice harmful woman non spousal violence violence related exploitation n physical sexual psychological violence occurring within general community including rape sexual abuse sexual harassment intimidation work educa tional institution elsewhere trafficking woman forced prostitution n physical sexual psychological violence perpetrated condoned state wherever occurs 18", "ProcessedSent": "violence woman shall understood encompass limited following n physical sexual psychological violence occurring family including batter ing sexual abuse female child household dowryrelated violence marital rape female genital mutilation traditional practice harmful woman non spousal violence violence related exploitation n physical sexual psychological violence occurring within general community including rape sexual abuse sexual harassment intimidation work educa tional institution elsewhere trafficking woman forced prostitution n physical sexual psychological violence perpetrated condoned state wherever occurs 18", "SentID": 7042 }, { "ParagraphID": 2162, - "Paragraph": "\\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \\n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \\n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \\n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \\n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \\n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \\n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \\n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \\n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \\n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \\n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \\n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \\n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \\n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", + "Paragraph": "\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -126786,14 +126786,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups?", + "Sentence": "\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups?", "newParagraph": "n many woman girl associated armed force group role played n facility treatment counselling protection prevent sexualized vio lence woman combatant conflict n demobilized retained part restructured force woman men right choose demobilized retained n sustainable funding ensure longterm success ddr process special fund allocated woman measure place ensure need receive proper attention n support local regional national woman organization enlisted aid reintegration n collaboration woman leader assisting excombatants widow returning civilian life enlisted n existing woman organization trained understand need experience excombatants n cantonment planned separate secure facility woman fuel food water provided woman leave security site n social security system exists woman excombatants easily access specifically designed meet need improve skill n economy support kind training woman might ask demobi lization period n obstacle narrow expectation woman work taken account childcare provided ensure woman equitable access training opportunity n training package offered woman reflect local gender norm standard genderappropriate behaviour training attempt change norm benefit hinder woman economic independence n single widowed female excombatants recognized head household permitted access housing land n legal measure place protect access land water", "ProcessedSent": "n many woman girl associated armed force group", "SentID": 7043 }, { "ParagraphID": 2162, - "Paragraph": "\\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \\n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \\n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \\n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \\n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \\n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \\n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \\n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \\n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \\n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \\n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \\n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \\n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \\n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", + "Paragraph": "\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -126811,7 +126811,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2162, - "Paragraph": "\\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \\n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \\n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \\n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \\n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \\n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \\n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \\n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \\n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \\n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \\n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \\n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \\n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \\n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", + "Paragraph": "\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -126822,14 +126822,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it?", + "Sentence": "\n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it?", "newParagraph": "n many woman girl associated armed force group role played n facility treatment counselling protection prevent sexualized vio lence woman combatant conflict n demobilized retained part restructured force woman men right choose demobilized retained n sustainable funding ensure longterm success ddr process special fund allocated woman measure place ensure need receive proper attention n support local regional national woman organization enlisted aid reintegration n collaboration woman leader assisting excombatants widow returning civilian life enlisted n existing woman organization trained understand need experience excombatants n cantonment planned separate secure facility woman fuel food water provided woman leave security site n social security system exists woman excombatants easily access specifically designed meet need improve skill n economy support kind training woman might ask demobi lization period n obstacle narrow expectation woman work taken account childcare provided ensure woman equitable access training opportunity n training package offered woman reflect local gender norm standard genderappropriate behaviour training attempt change norm benefit hinder woman economic independence n single widowed female excombatants recognized head household permitted access housing land n legal measure place protect access land water", "ProcessedSent": "n facility treatment counselling protection prevent sexualized vio lence woman combatant conflict", "SentID": 7045 }, { "ParagraphID": 2162, - "Paragraph": "\\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \\n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \\n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \\n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \\n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \\n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \\n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \\n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \\n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \\n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \\n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \\n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \\n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \\n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", + "Paragraph": "\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -126840,14 +126840,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force?", + "Sentence": "\n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force?", "newParagraph": "n many woman girl associated armed force group role played n facility treatment counselling protection prevent sexualized vio lence woman combatant conflict n demobilized retained part restructured force woman men right choose demobilized retained n sustainable funding ensure longterm success ddr process special fund allocated woman measure place ensure need receive proper attention n support local regional national woman organization enlisted aid reintegration n collaboration woman leader assisting excombatants widow returning civilian life enlisted n existing woman organization trained understand need experience excombatants n cantonment planned separate secure facility woman fuel food water provided woman leave security site n social security system exists woman excombatants easily access specifically designed meet need improve skill n economy support kind training woman might ask demobi lization period n obstacle narrow expectation woman work taken account childcare provided ensure woman equitable access training opportunity n training package offered woman reflect local gender norm standard genderappropriate behaviour training attempt change norm benefit hinder woman economic independence n single widowed female excombatants recognized head household permitted access housing land n legal measure place protect access land water", "ProcessedSent": "n demobilized retained part restructured force", "SentID": 7046 }, { "ParagraphID": 2162, - "Paragraph": "\\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \\n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \\n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \\n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \\n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \\n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \\n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \\n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \\n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \\n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \\n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \\n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \\n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \\n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", + "Paragraph": "\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -126865,7 +126865,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2162, - "Paragraph": "\\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \\n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \\n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \\n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \\n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \\n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \\n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \\n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \\n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \\n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \\n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \\n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \\n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \\n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", + "Paragraph": "\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -126876,14 +126876,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process?", + "Sentence": "\n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process?", "newParagraph": "n many woman girl associated armed force group role played n facility treatment counselling protection prevent sexualized vio lence woman combatant conflict n demobilized retained part restructured force woman men right choose demobilized retained n sustainable funding ensure longterm success ddr process special fund allocated woman measure place ensure need receive proper attention n support local regional national woman organization enlisted aid reintegration n collaboration woman leader assisting excombatants widow returning civilian life enlisted n existing woman organization trained understand need experience excombatants n cantonment planned separate secure facility woman fuel food water provided woman leave security site n social security system exists woman excombatants easily access specifically designed meet need improve skill n economy support kind training woman might ask demobi lization period n obstacle narrow expectation woman work taken account childcare provided ensure woman equitable access training opportunity n training package offered woman reflect local gender norm standard genderappropriate behaviour training attempt change norm benefit hinder woman economic independence n single widowed female excombatants recognized head household permitted access housing land n legal measure place protect access land water", "ProcessedSent": "n sustainable funding ensure longterm success ddr process", "SentID": 7048 }, { "ParagraphID": 2162, - "Paragraph": "\\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \\n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \\n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \\n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \\n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \\n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \\n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \\n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \\n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \\n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \\n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \\n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \\n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \\n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", + "Paragraph": "\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -126901,7 +126901,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2162, - "Paragraph": "\\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \\n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \\n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \\n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \\n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \\n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \\n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \\n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \\n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \\n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \\n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \\n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \\n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \\n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", + "Paragraph": "\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -126912,14 +126912,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration?", + "Sentence": "\n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration?", "newParagraph": "n many woman girl associated armed force group role played n facility treatment counselling protection prevent sexualized vio lence woman combatant conflict n demobilized retained part restructured force woman men right choose demobilized retained n sustainable funding ensure longterm success ddr process special fund allocated woman measure place ensure need receive proper attention n support local regional national woman organization enlisted aid reintegration n collaboration woman leader assisting excombatants widow returning civilian life enlisted n existing woman organization trained understand need experience excombatants n cantonment planned separate secure facility woman fuel food water provided woman leave security site n social security system exists woman excombatants easily access specifically designed meet need improve skill n economy support kind training woman might ask demobi lization period n obstacle narrow expectation woman work taken account childcare provided ensure woman equitable access training opportunity n training package offered woman reflect local gender norm standard genderappropriate behaviour training attempt change norm benefit hinder woman economic independence n single widowed female excombatants recognized head household permitted access housing land n legal measure place protect access land water", "ProcessedSent": "n support local regional national woman organization enlisted aid reintegration", "SentID": 7050 }, { "ParagraphID": 2162, - "Paragraph": "\\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \\n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \\n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \\n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \\n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \\n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \\n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \\n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \\n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \\n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \\n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \\n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \\n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \\n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", + "Paragraph": "\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -126930,14 +126930,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted?", + "Sentence": "\n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted?", "newParagraph": "n many woman girl associated armed force group role played n facility treatment counselling protection prevent sexualized vio lence woman combatant conflict n demobilized retained part restructured force woman men right choose demobilized retained n sustainable funding ensure longterm success ddr process special fund allocated woman measure place ensure need receive proper attention n support local regional national woman organization enlisted aid reintegration n collaboration woman leader assisting excombatants widow returning civilian life enlisted n existing woman organization trained understand need experience excombatants n cantonment planned separate secure facility woman fuel food water provided woman leave security site n social security system exists woman excombatants easily access specifically designed meet need improve skill n economy support kind training woman might ask demobi lization period n obstacle narrow expectation woman work taken account childcare provided ensure woman equitable access training opportunity n training package offered woman reflect local gender norm standard genderappropriate behaviour training attempt change norm benefit hinder woman economic independence n single widowed female excombatants recognized head household permitted access housing land n legal measure place protect access land water", "ProcessedSent": "n collaboration woman leader assisting excombatants widow returning civilian life enlisted", "SentID": 7051 }, { "ParagraphID": 2162, - "Paragraph": "\\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \\n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \\n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \\n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \\n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \\n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \\n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \\n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \\n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \\n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \\n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \\n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \\n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \\n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", + "Paragraph": "\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -126948,14 +126948,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants?", + "Sentence": "\n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants?", "newParagraph": "n many woman girl associated armed force group role played n facility treatment counselling protection prevent sexualized vio lence woman combatant conflict n demobilized retained part restructured force woman men right choose demobilized retained n sustainable funding ensure longterm success ddr process special fund allocated woman measure place ensure need receive proper attention n support local regional national woman organization enlisted aid reintegration n collaboration woman leader assisting excombatants widow returning civilian life enlisted n existing woman organization trained understand need experience excombatants n cantonment planned separate secure facility woman fuel food water provided woman leave security site n social security system exists woman excombatants easily access specifically designed meet need improve skill n economy support kind training woman might ask demobi lization period n obstacle narrow expectation woman work taken account childcare provided ensure woman equitable access training opportunity n training package offered woman reflect local gender norm standard genderappropriate behaviour training attempt change norm benefit hinder woman economic independence n single widowed female excombatants recognized head household permitted access housing land n legal measure place protect access land water", "ProcessedSent": "n existing woman organization trained understand need experience excombatants", "SentID": 7052 }, { "ParagraphID": 2162, - "Paragraph": "\\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \\n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \\n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \\n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \\n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \\n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \\n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \\n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \\n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \\n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \\n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \\n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \\n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \\n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", + "Paragraph": "\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -126966,14 +126966,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women?", + "Sentence": "\n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women?", "newParagraph": "n many woman girl associated armed force group role played n facility treatment counselling protection prevent sexualized vio lence woman combatant conflict n demobilized retained part restructured force woman men right choose demobilized retained n sustainable funding ensure longterm success ddr process special fund allocated woman measure place ensure need receive proper attention n support local regional national woman organization enlisted aid reintegration n collaboration woman leader assisting excombatants widow returning civilian life enlisted n existing woman organization trained understand need experience excombatants n cantonment planned separate secure facility woman fuel food water provided woman leave security site n social security system exists woman excombatants easily access specifically designed meet need improve skill n economy support kind training woman might ask demobi lization period n obstacle narrow expectation woman work taken account childcare provided ensure woman equitable access training opportunity n training package offered woman reflect local gender norm standard genderappropriate behaviour training attempt change norm benefit hinder woman economic independence n single widowed female excombatants recognized head household permitted access housing land n legal measure place protect access land water", "ProcessedSent": "n cantonment planned separate secure facility woman", "SentID": 7053 }, { "ParagraphID": 2162, - "Paragraph": "\\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \\n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \\n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \\n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \\n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \\n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \\n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \\n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \\n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \\n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \\n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \\n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \\n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \\n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", + "Paragraph": "\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -126991,7 +126991,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2162, - "Paragraph": "\\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \\n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \\n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \\n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \\n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \\n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \\n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \\n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \\n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \\n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \\n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \\n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \\n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \\n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", + "Paragraph": "\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127002,14 +127002,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it?", + "Sentence": "\n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it?", "newParagraph": "n many woman girl associated armed force group role played n facility treatment counselling protection prevent sexualized vio lence woman combatant conflict n demobilized retained part restructured force woman men right choose demobilized retained n sustainable funding ensure longterm success ddr process special fund allocated woman measure place ensure need receive proper attention n support local regional national woman organization enlisted aid reintegration n collaboration woman leader assisting excombatants widow returning civilian life enlisted n existing woman organization trained understand need experience excombatants n cantonment planned separate secure facility woman fuel food water provided woman leave security site n social security system exists woman excombatants easily access specifically designed meet need improve skill n economy support kind training woman might ask demobi lization period n obstacle narrow expectation woman work taken account childcare provided ensure woman equitable access training opportunity n training package offered woman reflect local gender norm standard genderappropriate behaviour training attempt change norm benefit hinder woman economic independence n single widowed female excombatants recognized head household permitted access housing land n legal measure place protect access land water", "ProcessedSent": "n social security system exists woman excombatants easily access", "SentID": 7055 }, { "ParagraphID": 2162, - "Paragraph": "\\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \\n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \\n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \\n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \\n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \\n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \\n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \\n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \\n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \\n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \\n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \\n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \\n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \\n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", + "Paragraph": "\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127027,7 +127027,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2162, - "Paragraph": "\\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \\n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \\n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \\n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \\n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \\n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \\n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \\n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \\n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \\n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \\n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \\n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \\n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \\n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", + "Paragraph": "\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127038,14 +127038,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period?", + "Sentence": "\n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period?", "newParagraph": "n many woman girl associated armed force group role played n facility treatment counselling protection prevent sexualized vio lence woman combatant conflict n demobilized retained part restructured force woman men right choose demobilized retained n sustainable funding ensure longterm success ddr process special fund allocated woman measure place ensure need receive proper attention n support local regional national woman organization enlisted aid reintegration n collaboration woman leader assisting excombatants widow returning civilian life enlisted n existing woman organization trained understand need experience excombatants n cantonment planned separate secure facility woman fuel food water provided woman leave security site n social security system exists woman excombatants easily access specifically designed meet need improve skill n economy support kind training woman might ask demobi lization period n obstacle narrow expectation woman work taken account childcare provided ensure woman equitable access training opportunity n training package offered woman reflect local gender norm standard genderappropriate behaviour training attempt change norm benefit hinder woman economic independence n single widowed female excombatants recognized head household permitted access housing land n legal measure place protect access land water", "ProcessedSent": "n economy support kind training woman might ask demobi lization period", "SentID": 7057 }, { "ParagraphID": 2162, - "Paragraph": "\\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \\n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \\n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \\n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \\n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \\n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \\n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \\n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \\n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \\n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \\n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \\n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \\n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \\n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", + "Paragraph": "\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127056,14 +127056,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account?", + "Sentence": "\n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account?", "newParagraph": "n many woman girl associated armed force group role played n facility treatment counselling protection prevent sexualized vio lence woman combatant conflict n demobilized retained part restructured force woman men right choose demobilized retained n sustainable funding ensure longterm success ddr process special fund allocated woman measure place ensure need receive proper attention n support local regional national woman organization enlisted aid reintegration n collaboration woman leader assisting excombatants widow returning civilian life enlisted n existing woman organization trained understand need experience excombatants n cantonment planned separate secure facility woman fuel food water provided woman leave security site n social security system exists woman excombatants easily access specifically designed meet need improve skill n economy support kind training woman might ask demobi lization period n obstacle narrow expectation woman work taken account childcare provided ensure woman equitable access training opportunity n training package offered woman reflect local gender norm standard genderappropriate behaviour training attempt change norm benefit hinder woman economic independence n single widowed female excombatants recognized head household permitted access housing land n legal measure place protect access land water", "ProcessedSent": "n obstacle narrow expectation woman work taken account", "SentID": 7058 }, { "ParagraphID": 2162, - "Paragraph": "\\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \\n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \\n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \\n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \\n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \\n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \\n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \\n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \\n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \\n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \\n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \\n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \\n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \\n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", + "Paragraph": "\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127081,7 +127081,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2162, - "Paragraph": "\\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \\n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \\n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \\n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \\n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \\n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \\n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \\n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \\n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \\n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \\n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \\n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \\n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \\n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", + "Paragraph": "\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127092,14 +127092,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms?", + "Sentence": "\n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms?", "newParagraph": "n many woman girl associated armed force group role played n facility treatment counselling protection prevent sexualized vio lence woman combatant conflict n demobilized retained part restructured force woman men right choose demobilized retained n sustainable funding ensure longterm success ddr process special fund allocated woman measure place ensure need receive proper attention n support local regional national woman organization enlisted aid reintegration n collaboration woman leader assisting excombatants widow returning civilian life enlisted n existing woman organization trained understand need experience excombatants n cantonment planned separate secure facility woman fuel food water provided woman leave security site n social security system exists woman excombatants easily access specifically designed meet need improve skill n economy support kind training woman might ask demobi lization period n obstacle narrow expectation woman work taken account childcare provided ensure woman equitable access training opportunity n training package offered woman reflect local gender norm standard genderappropriate behaviour training attempt change norm benefit hinder woman economic independence n single widowed female excombatants recognized head household permitted access housing land n legal measure place protect access land water", "ProcessedSent": "n training package offered woman reflect local gender norm standard genderappropriate behaviour training attempt change norm", "SentID": 7060 }, { "ParagraphID": 2162, - "Paragraph": "\\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \\n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \\n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \\n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \\n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \\n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \\n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \\n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \\n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \\n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \\n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \\n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \\n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \\n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", + "Paragraph": "\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127117,7 +127117,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2162, - "Paragraph": "\\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \\n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \\n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \\n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \\n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \\n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \\n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \\n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \\n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \\n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \\n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \\n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \\n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \\n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", + "Paragraph": "\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127128,14 +127128,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land?", + "Sentence": "\n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land?", "newParagraph": "n many woman girl associated armed force group role played n facility treatment counselling protection prevent sexualized vio lence woman combatant conflict n demobilized retained part restructured force woman men right choose demobilized retained n sustainable funding ensure longterm success ddr process special fund allocated woman measure place ensure need receive proper attention n support local regional national woman organization enlisted aid reintegration n collaboration woman leader assisting excombatants widow returning civilian life enlisted n existing woman organization trained understand need experience excombatants n cantonment planned separate secure facility woman fuel food water provided woman leave security site n social security system exists woman excombatants easily access specifically designed meet need improve skill n economy support kind training woman might ask demobi lization period n obstacle narrow expectation woman work taken account childcare provided ensure woman equitable access training opportunity n training package offered woman reflect local gender norm standard genderappropriate behaviour training attempt change norm benefit hinder woman economic independence n single widowed female excombatants recognized head household permitted access housing land n legal measure place protect access land water", "ProcessedSent": "n single widowed female excombatants recognized head household permitted access housing land", "SentID": 7062 }, { "ParagraphID": 2162, - "Paragraph": "\\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \\n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \\n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \\n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \\n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \\n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \\n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \\n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \\n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \\n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \\n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \\n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \\n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \\n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", + "Paragraph": "\n How many women and girls are in and associated with the armed forces and groups? What roles have they played? \n Are there facilities for treatment, counselling and protection to prevent sexualized vio- lence against women combatants, both during the conflict and after it? \n Who is demobilized and who is retained as part of the restructured force? Do women and men have the same right to choose to be demobilized or retained? \n Is there sustainable funding to ensure the long-term success of the DDR process? Are special funds allocated to women, and if not, what measures are in place to ensure that their needs will receive proper attention? \n Has the support of local, regional and national women\u2019s organizations been enlisted to aid reintegration? \n Has the collaboration of women leaders in assisting ex-combatants and widows returning to civilian life been enlisted? \n Are existing women\u2019s organizations being trained to understand the needs and experiences of ex-combatants? \n If cantonment is being planned, will there be separate and secure facilities for women? Will fuel, food and water be provided so women do not have to leave the security of the site? \n If a social security system exists, can women ex-combatants easily access it? Is it specifically designed to meet their needs and to improve their skills? \n Can the economy support the kind of training women might ask for during the demobi- lization period? \n Have obstacles, such as narrow expectations of women\u2019s work, been taken into account? Will childcare be provided to ensure that women have equitable access to training opportunities? \n Do training packages offered to women reflect local gender norms and standards about gender-appropriate behaviour or does training attempt to change these norms? Does this benefit or hinder women\u2019s economic independence? \n Are single or widowed female ex-combatants recognized as heads of households and permitted access to housing and land? \n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127146,14 +127146,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", + "Sentence": "\n Are legal measures in place to protect their access to land and water?", "newParagraph": "n many woman girl associated armed force group role played n facility treatment counselling protection prevent sexualized vio lence woman combatant conflict n demobilized retained part restructured force woman men right choose demobilized retained n sustainable funding ensure longterm success ddr process special fund allocated woman measure place ensure need receive proper attention n support local regional national woman organization enlisted aid reintegration n collaboration woman leader assisting excombatants widow returning civilian life enlisted n existing woman organization trained understand need experience excombatants n cantonment planned separate secure facility woman fuel food water provided woman leave security site n social security system exists woman excombatants easily access specifically designed meet need improve skill n economy support kind training woman might ask demobi lization period n obstacle narrow expectation woman work taken account childcare provided ensure woman equitable access training opportunity n training package offered woman reflect local gender norm standard genderappropriate behaviour training attempt change norm benefit hinder woman economic independence n single widowed female excombatants recognized head household permitted access housing land n legal measure place protect access land water", "ProcessedSent": "n legal measure place protect access land water", "SentID": 7063 }, { "ParagraphID": 2163, - "Paragraph": "Field\/Needs assessment for female ex-combatants, supporters and dependants should be carried out independently of general need assessment, because of the specific needs and concerns of women. Those assessing the needs of women should be aware of gender needs in conflict situations. The use of gender-analysis frameworks should be strongly encouraged to collect information and data on the following: \\n\\n Social and cultural context \\n Gender roles and gender division of labour (both in public and private spheres) \\n Traditional practices that oppose the human rights of women \\n\\n Political context \\n Political participation of women at the national and community levels \\n Access to education for girls \\n\\n Economic context \\n Socio-economic status of women \\n Women\u2019s access to and control over resources \\n\\n Capacity and vulnerability \\n Capacities and vulnerabilities of women and girls \\n Existing local support networks for women and girls \\n Capacities of local women\u2019s associations and NGOs \\n\\n Security \\n Extent of women\u2019s participation in the security sector (police, military, government) \\n Level of sexual and gender-based violence \\n\\n Specific needs of female ex-combatants, supporters and dependants (economic, social, physical, psychological, cultural, political, etc.)", + "Paragraph": "Field\/Needs assessment for female ex-combatants, supporters and dependants should be carried out independently of general need assessment, because of the specific needs and concerns of women. Those assessing the needs of women should be aware of gender needs in conflict situations. The use of gender-analysis frameworks should be strongly encouraged to collect information and data on the following: \n\n Social and cultural context \n Gender roles and gender division of labour (both in public and private spheres) \n Traditional practices that oppose the human rights of women \n\n Political context \n Political participation of women at the national and community levels \n Access to education for girls \n\n Economic context \n Socio-economic status of women \n Women\u2019s access to and control over resources \n\n Capacity and vulnerability \n Capacities and vulnerabilities of women and girls \n Existing local support networks for women and girls \n Capacities of local women\u2019s associations and NGOs \n\n Security \n Extent of women\u2019s participation in the security sector (police, military, government) \n Level of sexual and gender-based violence \n\n Specific needs of female ex-combatants, supporters and dependants (economic, social, physical, psychological, cultural, political, etc.)", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127171,7 +127171,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2163, - "Paragraph": "Field\/Needs assessment for female ex-combatants, supporters and dependants should be carried out independently of general need assessment, because of the specific needs and concerns of women. Those assessing the needs of women should be aware of gender needs in conflict situations. The use of gender-analysis frameworks should be strongly encouraged to collect information and data on the following: \\n\\n Social and cultural context \\n Gender roles and gender division of labour (both in public and private spheres) \\n Traditional practices that oppose the human rights of women \\n\\n Political context \\n Political participation of women at the national and community levels \\n Access to education for girls \\n\\n Economic context \\n Socio-economic status of women \\n Women\u2019s access to and control over resources \\n\\n Capacity and vulnerability \\n Capacities and vulnerabilities of women and girls \\n Existing local support networks for women and girls \\n Capacities of local women\u2019s associations and NGOs \\n\\n Security \\n Extent of women\u2019s participation in the security sector (police, military, government) \\n Level of sexual and gender-based violence \\n\\n Specific needs of female ex-combatants, supporters and dependants (economic, social, physical, psychological, cultural, political, etc.)", + "Paragraph": "Field\/Needs assessment for female ex-combatants, supporters and dependants should be carried out independently of general need assessment, because of the specific needs and concerns of women. Those assessing the needs of women should be aware of gender needs in conflict situations. The use of gender-analysis frameworks should be strongly encouraged to collect information and data on the following: \n\n Social and cultural context \n Gender roles and gender division of labour (both in public and private spheres) \n Traditional practices that oppose the human rights of women \n\n Political context \n Political participation of women at the national and community levels \n Access to education for girls \n\n Economic context \n Socio-economic status of women \n Women\u2019s access to and control over resources \n\n Capacity and vulnerability \n Capacities and vulnerabilities of women and girls \n Existing local support networks for women and girls \n Capacities of local women\u2019s associations and NGOs \n\n Security \n Extent of women\u2019s participation in the security sector (police, military, government) \n Level of sexual and gender-based violence \n\n Specific needs of female ex-combatants, supporters and dependants (economic, social, physical, psychological, cultural, political, etc.)", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127189,7 +127189,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2163, - "Paragraph": "Field\/Needs assessment for female ex-combatants, supporters and dependants should be carried out independently of general need assessment, because of the specific needs and concerns of women. Those assessing the needs of women should be aware of gender needs in conflict situations. The use of gender-analysis frameworks should be strongly encouraged to collect information and data on the following: \\n\\n Social and cultural context \\n Gender roles and gender division of labour (both in public and private spheres) \\n Traditional practices that oppose the human rights of women \\n\\n Political context \\n Political participation of women at the national and community levels \\n Access to education for girls \\n\\n Economic context \\n Socio-economic status of women \\n Women\u2019s access to and control over resources \\n\\n Capacity and vulnerability \\n Capacities and vulnerabilities of women and girls \\n Existing local support networks for women and girls \\n Capacities of local women\u2019s associations and NGOs \\n\\n Security \\n Extent of women\u2019s participation in the security sector (police, military, government) \\n Level of sexual and gender-based violence \\n\\n Specific needs of female ex-combatants, supporters and dependants (economic, social, physical, psychological, cultural, political, etc.)", + "Paragraph": "Field\/Needs assessment for female ex-combatants, supporters and dependants should be carried out independently of general need assessment, because of the specific needs and concerns of women. Those assessing the needs of women should be aware of gender needs in conflict situations. The use of gender-analysis frameworks should be strongly encouraged to collect information and data on the following: \n\n Social and cultural context \n Gender roles and gender division of labour (both in public and private spheres) \n Traditional practices that oppose the human rights of women \n\n Political context \n Political participation of women at the national and community levels \n Access to education for girls \n\n Economic context \n Socio-economic status of women \n Women\u2019s access to and control over resources \n\n Capacity and vulnerability \n Capacities and vulnerabilities of women and girls \n Existing local support networks for women and girls \n Capacities of local women\u2019s associations and NGOs \n\n Security \n Extent of women\u2019s participation in the security sector (police, military, government) \n Level of sexual and gender-based violence \n\n Specific needs of female ex-combatants, supporters and dependants (economic, social, physical, psychological, cultural, political, etc.)", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127200,7 +127200,7 @@ "Heading2": "1. Gender-responsive field\/needs assessment", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The use of gender-analysis frameworks should be strongly encouraged to collect information and data on the following: \\n\\n Social and cultural context \\n Gender roles and gender division of labour (both in public and private spheres) \\n Traditional practices that oppose the human rights of women \\n\\n Political context \\n Political participation of women at the national and community levels \\n Access to education for girls \\n\\n Economic context \\n Socio-economic status of women \\n Women\u2019s access to and control over resources \\n\\n Capacity and vulnerability \\n Capacities and vulnerabilities of women and girls \\n Existing local support networks for women and girls \\n Capacities of local women\u2019s associations and NGOs \\n\\n Security \\n Extent of women\u2019s participation in the security sector (police, military, government) \\n Level of sexual and gender-based violence \\n\\n Specific needs of female ex-combatants, supporters and dependants (economic, social, physical, psychological, cultural, political, etc.)", + "Sentence": "The use of gender-analysis frameworks should be strongly encouraged to collect information and data on the following: \n\n Social and cultural context \n Gender roles and gender division of labour (both in public and private spheres) \n Traditional practices that oppose the human rights of women \n\n Political context \n Political participation of women at the national and community levels \n Access to education for girls \n\n Economic context \n Socio-economic status of women \n Women\u2019s access to and control over resources \n\n Capacity and vulnerability \n Capacities and vulnerabilities of women and girls \n Existing local support networks for women and girls \n Capacities of local women\u2019s associations and NGOs \n\n Security \n Extent of women\u2019s participation in the security sector (police, military, government) \n Level of sexual and gender-based violence \n\n Specific needs of female ex-combatants, supporters and dependants (economic, social, physical, psychological, cultural, political, etc.)", "newParagraph": "fieldneeds assessment female excombatants supporter dependant carried independently general need assessment specific need concern woman assessing need woman aware gender need conflict situation use genderanalysis framework strongly encouraged collect information data following nn social cultural context n gender role gender division labour public private sphere n traditional practice oppose human right woman nn political context n political participation woman national community level n access education girl nn economic context n socioeconomic status woman n woman access control resource nn capacity vulnerability n capacity vulnerability woman girl n existing local support network woman girl n capacity local woman association ngo nn security n extent woman participation security sector police military government n level sexual genderbased violence nn specific need female excombatants supporter dependant economic social physical psychological cultural political etc", "ProcessedSent": "use genderanalysis framework strongly encouraged collect information data following nn social cultural context n gender role gender division labour public private sphere n traditional practice oppose human right woman nn political context n political participation woman national community level n access education girl nn economic context n socioeconomic status woman n woman access control resource nn capacity vulnerability n capacity vulnerability woman girl n existing local support network woman girl n capacity local woman association ngo nn security n extent woman participation security sector police military government n level sexual genderbased violence nn specific need female excombatants supporter dependant economic social physical psychological cultural political etc", "SentID": 7066 @@ -127297,7 +127297,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2166, - "Paragraph": "The matrix below is an example of how the framework can be used. A similar approach can be created in the field, based on collective interviews and\/or focus groups with women\u2019s NGOs, community leaders, female ex-combatants and supporters: \\n Capacities refer to the existing strengths of individuals and groups to cope with a crisis and to improve the quality of their lives; \\n Vulnerabilities refer to factors that weaken the people\u2019s ability to create positive changes in their lives and community.", + "Paragraph": "The matrix below is an example of how the framework can be used. A similar approach can be created in the field, based on collective interviews and\/or focus groups with women\u2019s NGOs, community leaders, female ex-combatants and supporters: \n Capacities refer to the existing strengths of individuals and groups to cope with a crisis and to improve the quality of their lives; \n Vulnerabilities refer to factors that weaken the people\u2019s ability to create positive changes in their lives and community.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127315,7 +127315,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2166, - "Paragraph": "The matrix below is an example of how the framework can be used. A similar approach can be created in the field, based on collective interviews and\/or focus groups with women\u2019s NGOs, community leaders, female ex-combatants and supporters: \\n Capacities refer to the existing strengths of individuals and groups to cope with a crisis and to improve the quality of their lives; \\n Vulnerabilities refer to factors that weaken the people\u2019s ability to create positive changes in their lives and community.", + "Paragraph": "The matrix below is an example of how the framework can be used. A similar approach can be created in the field, based on collective interviews and\/or focus groups with women\u2019s NGOs, community leaders, female ex-combatants and supporters: \n Capacities refer to the existing strengths of individuals and groups to cope with a crisis and to improve the quality of their lives; \n Vulnerabilities refer to factors that weaken the people\u2019s ability to create positive changes in their lives and community.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127326,14 +127326,14 @@ "Heading2": "1. Gender-responsive field\/needs assessment", "Heading3": "1.1. Matrix to assess capacities and vulnerabilities", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "A similar approach can be created in the field, based on collective interviews and\/or focus groups with women\u2019s NGOs, community leaders, female ex-combatants and supporters: \\n Capacities refer to the existing strengths of individuals and groups to cope with a crisis and to improve the quality of their lives; \\n Vulnerabilities refer to factors that weaken the people\u2019s ability to create positive changes in their lives and community.", + "Sentence": "A similar approach can be created in the field, based on collective interviews and\/or focus groups with women\u2019s NGOs, community leaders, female ex-combatants and supporters: \n Capacities refer to the existing strengths of individuals and groups to cope with a crisis and to improve the quality of their lives; \n Vulnerabilities refer to factors that weaken the people\u2019s ability to create positive changes in their lives and community.", "newParagraph": "matrix example framework used similar approach created field based collective interview andor focus group woman ngo community leader female excombatants supporter n capacity refer existing strength individual group cope crisis improve quality life n vulnerability refer factor weaken people ability create positive change life community", "ProcessedSent": "similar approach created field based collective interview andor focus group woman ngo community leader female excombatants supporter n capacity refer existing strength individual group cope crisis improve quality life n vulnerability refer factor weaken people ability create positive change life community", "SentID": 7073 }, { "ParagraphID": 2167, - "Paragraph": "The formulation of a project\/programme should reflect the results of needs assessments of female ex-combatants and other FAAFGs. Gender dimensions should be included in the following components: \\n programme goals; project objectives; \\n outputs; \\n indicative activities; \\n inputs; \\n indicators (for baseline data and monitoring and evaluation).", + "Paragraph": "The formulation of a project\/programme should reflect the results of needs assessments of female ex-combatants and other FAAFGs. Gender dimensions should be included in the following components: \n programme goals; project objectives; \n outputs; \n indicative activities; \n inputs; \n indicators (for baseline data and monitoring and evaluation).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127351,7 +127351,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2167, - "Paragraph": "The formulation of a project\/programme should reflect the results of needs assessments of female ex-combatants and other FAAFGs. Gender dimensions should be included in the following components: \\n programme goals; project objectives; \\n outputs; \\n indicative activities; \\n inputs; \\n indicators (for baseline data and monitoring and evaluation).", + "Paragraph": "The formulation of a project\/programme should reflect the results of needs assessments of female ex-combatants and other FAAFGs. Gender dimensions should be included in the following components: \n programme goals; project objectives; \n outputs; \n indicative activities; \n inputs; \n indicators (for baseline data and monitoring and evaluation).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127362,7 +127362,7 @@ "Heading2": "2. Gender-responsive programme design", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Gender dimensions should be included in the following components: \\n programme goals; project objectives; \\n outputs; \\n indicative activities; \\n inputs; \\n indicators (for baseline data and monitoring and evaluation).", + "Sentence": "Gender dimensions should be included in the following components: \n programme goals; project objectives; \n outputs; \n indicative activities; \n inputs; \n indicators (for baseline data and monitoring and evaluation).", "newParagraph": "formulation projectprogramme reflect result need assessment female excombatants faafgs gender dimension included following component n programme goal project objective n output n indicative activity n input n indicator baseline data monitoring evaluation", "ProcessedSent": "gender dimension included following component n programme goal project objective n output n indicative activity n input n indicator baseline data monitoring evaluation", "SentID": 7075 @@ -127423,7 +127423,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2169, - "Paragraph": "In addition to objectives, indicators and outputs defined in the programme design, there is a need to specify the following categories within a results-based budgeting framework: \\n female-specific activities (e.g., job training for female ex-combatants, counselling for the victims of gender-based violence) and its inputs (trained staff, adequate facilities); \\n gender training (to programme staff, government officials, ex-combatants, supporters and dependants) and its inputs (trained staff, adequate facilities); \\n gender adviser(s); \\n unit cost (per participant) of all activities disaggregated by gender. \\n\\n It is also advisable to ask donors to specify the allocation of funds to female-specific interventions and gender training (also see IDDRS 3.41 on Finance and Budgeting).", + "Paragraph": "In addition to objectives, indicators and outputs defined in the programme design, there is a need to specify the following categories within a results-based budgeting framework: \n female-specific activities (e.g., job training for female ex-combatants, counselling for the victims of gender-based violence) and its inputs (trained staff, adequate facilities); \n gender training (to programme staff, government officials, ex-combatants, supporters and dependants) and its inputs (trained staff, adequate facilities); \n gender adviser(s); \n unit cost (per participant) of all activities disaggregated by gender. \n\n It is also advisable to ask donors to specify the allocation of funds to female-specific interventions and gender training (also see IDDRS 3.41 on Finance and Budgeting).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127434,14 +127434,14 @@ "Heading2": "3. Gender-responsive budgeting in DDR programming", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "In addition to objectives, indicators and outputs defined in the programme design, there is a need to specify the following categories within a results-based budgeting framework: \\n female-specific activities (e.g., job training for female ex-combatants, counselling for the victims of gender-based violence) and its inputs (trained staff, adequate facilities); \\n gender training (to programme staff, government officials, ex-combatants, supporters and dependants) and its inputs (trained staff, adequate facilities); \\n gender adviser(s); \\n unit cost (per participant) of all activities disaggregated by gender.", + "Sentence": "In addition to objectives, indicators and outputs defined in the programme design, there is a need to specify the following categories within a results-based budgeting framework: \n female-specific activities (e.g., job training for female ex-combatants, counselling for the victims of gender-based violence) and its inputs (trained staff, adequate facilities); \n gender training (to programme staff, government officials, ex-combatants, supporters and dependants) and its inputs (trained staff, adequate facilities); \n gender adviser(s); \n unit cost (per participant) of all activities disaggregated by gender.", "newParagraph": "addition objective indicator output defined programme design need specify following category within resultsbased budgeting framework n femalespecific activity eg job training female excombatants counselling victim genderbased violence input trained staff adequate facility n gender training programme staff government official excombatants supporter dependant input trained staff adequate facility n gender adviser n unit cost per participant activity disaggregated gender nn also advisable ask donor specify allocation fund femalespecific intervention gender training also see iddrs 341 finance budgeting", "ProcessedSent": "addition objective indicator output defined programme design need specify following category within resultsbased budgeting framework n femalespecific activity eg job training female excombatants counselling victim genderbased violence input trained staff adequate facility n gender training programme staff government official excombatants supporter dependant input trained staff adequate facility n gender adviser n unit cost per participant activity disaggregated gender", "SentID": 7079 }, { "ParagraphID": 2169, - "Paragraph": "In addition to objectives, indicators and outputs defined in the programme design, there is a need to specify the following categories within a results-based budgeting framework: \\n female-specific activities (e.g., job training for female ex-combatants, counselling for the victims of gender-based violence) and its inputs (trained staff, adequate facilities); \\n gender training (to programme staff, government officials, ex-combatants, supporters and dependants) and its inputs (trained staff, adequate facilities); \\n gender adviser(s); \\n unit cost (per participant) of all activities disaggregated by gender. \\n\\n It is also advisable to ask donors to specify the allocation of funds to female-specific interventions and gender training (also see IDDRS 3.41 on Finance and Budgeting).", + "Paragraph": "In addition to objectives, indicators and outputs defined in the programme design, there is a need to specify the following categories within a results-based budgeting framework: \n female-specific activities (e.g., job training for female ex-combatants, counselling for the victims of gender-based violence) and its inputs (trained staff, adequate facilities); \n gender training (to programme staff, government officials, ex-combatants, supporters and dependants) and its inputs (trained staff, adequate facilities); \n gender adviser(s); \n unit cost (per participant) of all activities disaggregated by gender. \n\n It is also advisable to ask donors to specify the allocation of funds to female-specific interventions and gender training (also see IDDRS 3.41 on Finance and Budgeting).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127452,7 +127452,7 @@ "Heading2": "3. Gender-responsive budgeting in DDR programming", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n It is also advisable to ask donors to specify the allocation of funds to female-specific interventions and gender training (also see IDDRS 3.41 on Finance and Budgeting).", + "Sentence": "\n\n It is also advisable to ask donors to specify the allocation of funds to female-specific interventions and gender training (also see IDDRS 3.41 on Finance and Budgeting).", "newParagraph": "addition objective indicator output defined programme design need specify following category within resultsbased budgeting framework n femalespecific activity eg job training female excombatants counselling victim genderbased violence input trained staff adequate facility n gender training programme staff government official excombatants supporter dependant input trained staff adequate facility n gender adviser n unit cost per participant activity disaggregated gender nn also advisable ask donor specify allocation fund femalespecific intervention gender training also see iddrs 341 finance budgeting", "ProcessedSent": "nn also advisable ask donor specify allocation fund femalespecific intervention gender training also see iddrs 341 finance budgeting", "SentID": 7080 @@ -127567,7 +127567,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2172, - "Paragraph": "These matrixes consist of six M&E frameworks: \\n 1.Monitoring programme performance (disarmament; demobilization; reintegration) \\n 2.Monitoring process \\n 3.Evaluation of outcomes\/results \\n 4.Evaluation of impact \\n 5.Evaluation of budget (gender-responsive budget analysis) \\n 6.Evaluation of programme management.", + "Paragraph": "These matrixes consist of six M&E frameworks: \n 1.Monitoring programme performance (disarmament; demobilization; reintegration) \n 2.Monitoring process \n 3.Evaluation of outcomes\/results \n 4.Evaluation of impact \n 5.Evaluation of budget (gender-responsive budget analysis) \n 6.Evaluation of programme management.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127578,14 +127578,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "These matrixes consist of six M&E frameworks: \\n 1.Monitoring programme performance (disarmament; demobilization; reintegration) \\n 2.Monitoring process \\n 3.Evaluation of outcomes\/results \\n 4.Evaluation of impact \\n 5.Evaluation of budget (gender-responsive budget analysis) \\n 6.Evaluation of programme management.", + "Sentence": "These matrixes consist of six M&E frameworks: \n 1.Monitoring programme performance (disarmament; demobilization; reintegration) \n 2.Monitoring process \n 3.Evaluation of outcomes\/results \n 4.Evaluation of impact \n 5.Evaluation of budget (gender-responsive budget analysis) \n 6.Evaluation of programme management.", "newParagraph": "matrix consist six framework n 1monitoring programme performance disarmament demobilization reintegration n 2monitoring process n 3evaluation outcomesresults n 4evaluation impact n 5evaluation budget genderresponsive budget analysis n 6evaluation programme management", "ProcessedSent": "matrix consist six framework n 1monitoring programme performance disarmament demobilization reintegration n 2monitoring process n 3evaluation outcomesresults n 4evaluation impact n 5evaluation budget genderresponsive budget analysis n 6evaluation programme management", "SentID": 7087 }, { "ParagraphID": 2173, - "Paragraph": "The following are the primary sources of data, and data collection instruments and techniques: \\n national and municipal government data; \\n health-related data (e.g., data collected at ante-natal clinics); \\n programme\/project reports; \\n surveys (e.g., household surveys); \\n interviews (e.g., focus groups, structured and open-ended interviews).", + "Paragraph": "The following are the primary sources of data, and data collection instruments and techniques: \n national and municipal government data; \n health-related data (e.g., data collected at ante-natal clinics); \n programme\/project reports; \n surveys (e.g., household surveys); \n interviews (e.g., focus groups, structured and open-ended interviews).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127596,7 +127596,7 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The following are the primary sources of data, and data collection instruments and techniques: \\n national and municipal government data; \\n health-related data (e.g., data collected at ante-natal clinics); \\n programme\/project reports; \\n surveys (e.g., household surveys); \\n interviews (e.g., focus groups, structured and open-ended interviews).", + "Sentence": "The following are the primary sources of data, and data collection instruments and techniques: \n national and municipal government data; \n health-related data (e.g., data collected at ante-natal clinics); \n programme\/project reports; \n surveys (e.g., household surveys); \n interviews (e.g., focus groups, structured and open-ended interviews).", "newParagraph": "following primary source data data collection instrument technique n national municipal government data n healthrelated data eg data collected antenatal clinic n programmeproject report n survey eg household survey n interview eg focus group structured openended interview", "ProcessedSent": "following primary source data data collection instrument technique n national municipal government data n healthrelated data eg data collected antenatal clinic n programmeproject report n survey eg household survey n interview eg focus group structured openended interview", "SentID": 7088 @@ -127711,7 +127711,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2177, - "Paragraph": "\\n\\n Purpose of monitoring: To monitor programme performance for female ex-combatants, supporters and dependants at each stage of DDR: \\n monitoring of disarmament; \\n monitoring of demobilization; \\n monitoring of reintegration; \\n\\n Data collection frequency: Every month during the implementation of the programme.", + "Paragraph": "\n\n Purpose of monitoring: To monitor programme performance for female ex-combatants, supporters and dependants at each stage of DDR: \n monitoring of disarmament; \n monitoring of demobilization; \n monitoring of reintegration; \n\n Data collection frequency: Every month during the implementation of the programme.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127722,14 +127722,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Purpose of monitoring: To monitor programme performance for female ex-combatants, supporters and dependants at each stage of DDR: \\n monitoring of disarmament; \\n monitoring of demobilization; \\n monitoring of reintegration; \\n\\n Data collection frequency: Every month during the implementation of the programme.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Purpose of monitoring: To monitor programme performance for female ex-combatants, supporters and dependants at each stage of DDR: \n monitoring of disarmament; \n monitoring of demobilization; \n monitoring of reintegration; \n\n Data collection frequency: Every month during the implementation of the programme.", "newParagraph": "nn purpose monitoring monitor programme performance female excombatants supporter dependant stage ddr n monitoring disarmament n monitoring demobilization n monitoring reintegration nn data collection frequency every month implementation programme", "ProcessedSent": "nn purpose monitoring monitor programme performance female excombatants supporter dependant stage ddr n monitoring disarmament n monitoring demobilization n monitoring reintegration nn data collection frequency every month implementation programme", "SentID": 7095 }, { "ParagraphID": 2178, - "Paragraph": "Key questions to ask: \\n To what extent did the disarmament programme succeed in disarming female ex- combatants? \\n To what extent did the disarmament programme provide gender-sensitive and female- specific services?", + "Paragraph": "Key questions to ask: \n To what extent did the disarmament programme succeed in disarming female ex- combatants? \n To what extent did the disarmament programme provide gender-sensitive and female- specific services?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127740,14 +127740,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.1. Monitoring of disarmament", - "Sentence": "Key questions to ask: \\n To what extent did the disarmament programme succeed in disarming female ex- combatants?", + "Sentence": "Key questions to ask: \n To what extent did the disarmament programme succeed in disarming female ex- combatants?", "newParagraph": "key question ask n extent disarmament programme succeed disarming female ex combatant n extent disarmament programme provide gendersensitive female specific service", "ProcessedSent": "key question ask n extent disarmament programme succeed disarming female ex combatant", "SentID": 7096 }, { "ParagraphID": 2178, - "Paragraph": "Key questions to ask: \\n To what extent did the disarmament programme succeed in disarming female ex- combatants? \\n To what extent did the disarmament programme provide gender-sensitive and female- specific services?", + "Paragraph": "Key questions to ask: \n To what extent did the disarmament programme succeed in disarming female ex- combatants? \n To what extent did the disarmament programme provide gender-sensitive and female- specific services?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127758,14 +127758,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.1. Monitoring of disarmament", - "Sentence": "\\n To what extent did the disarmament programme provide gender-sensitive and female- specific services?", + "Sentence": "\n To what extent did the disarmament programme provide gender-sensitive and female- specific services?", "newParagraph": "key question ask n extent disarmament programme succeed disarming female ex combatant n extent disarmament programme provide gendersensitive female specific service", "ProcessedSent": "n extent disarmament programme provide gendersensitive female specific service", "SentID": 7097 }, { "ParagraphID": 2179, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of FXC who registered for disarmament programme \\n 2. % of weapons collected from FXC \\n 3. Number of female staff who were at weapons-collection and -registration sites (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 4. Number of information campaigns conducted specifically to inform women and girls about DDR programmes", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of FXC who registered for disarmament programme \n 2. % of weapons collected from FXC \n 3. Number of female staff who were at weapons-collection and -registration sites (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \n 4. Number of information campaigns conducted specifically to inform women and girls about DDR programmes", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127776,14 +127776,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.1. Monitoring of disarmament", - "Sentence": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1.", + "Sentence": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number fxc registered disarmament programme n 2 weapon collected fxc n 3 number female staff weaponscollection registration site eg female translator military staff social worker gender adviser n 4 number information campaign conducted specifically inform woman girl ddr programme", "ProcessedSent": "key measurable indicator n 1", "SentID": 7098 }, { "ParagraphID": 2179, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of FXC who registered for disarmament programme \\n 2. % of weapons collected from FXC \\n 3. Number of female staff who were at weapons-collection and -registration sites (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 4. Number of information campaigns conducted specifically to inform women and girls about DDR programmes", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of FXC who registered for disarmament programme \n 2. % of weapons collected from FXC \n 3. Number of female staff who were at weapons-collection and -registration sites (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \n 4. Number of information campaigns conducted specifically to inform women and girls about DDR programmes", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127794,14 +127794,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.1. Monitoring of disarmament", - "Sentence": "Number of FXC who registered for disarmament programme \\n 2.", + "Sentence": "Number of FXC who registered for disarmament programme \n 2.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number fxc registered disarmament programme n 2 weapon collected fxc n 3 number female staff weaponscollection registration site eg female translator military staff social worker gender adviser n 4 number information campaign conducted specifically inform woman girl ddr programme", "ProcessedSent": "number fxc registered disarmament programme n 2", "SentID": 7099 }, { "ParagraphID": 2179, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of FXC who registered for disarmament programme \\n 2. % of weapons collected from FXC \\n 3. Number of female staff who were at weapons-collection and -registration sites (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 4. Number of information campaigns conducted specifically to inform women and girls about DDR programmes", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of FXC who registered for disarmament programme \n 2. % of weapons collected from FXC \n 3. Number of female staff who were at weapons-collection and -registration sites (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \n 4. Number of information campaigns conducted specifically to inform women and girls about DDR programmes", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127812,14 +127812,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.1. Monitoring of disarmament", - "Sentence": "% of weapons collected from FXC \\n 3.", + "Sentence": "% of weapons collected from FXC \n 3.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number fxc registered disarmament programme n 2 weapon collected fxc n 3 number female staff weaponscollection registration site eg female translator military staff social worker gender adviser n 4 number information campaign conducted specifically inform woman girl ddr programme", "ProcessedSent": " weapon collected fxc n 3", "SentID": 7100 }, { "ParagraphID": 2179, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of FXC who registered for disarmament programme \\n 2. % of weapons collected from FXC \\n 3. Number of female staff who were at weapons-collection and -registration sites (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 4. Number of information campaigns conducted specifically to inform women and girls about DDR programmes", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of FXC who registered for disarmament programme \n 2. % of weapons collected from FXC \n 3. Number of female staff who were at weapons-collection and -registration sites (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \n 4. Number of information campaigns conducted specifically to inform women and girls about DDR programmes", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127830,14 +127830,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.1. Monitoring of disarmament", - "Sentence": "Number of female staff who were at weapons-collection and -registration sites (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 4.", + "Sentence": "Number of female staff who were at weapons-collection and -registration sites (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \n 4.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number fxc registered disarmament programme n 2 weapon collected fxc n 3 number female staff weaponscollection registration site eg female translator military staff social worker gender adviser n 4 number information campaign conducted specifically inform woman girl ddr programme", "ProcessedSent": "number female staff weaponscollection registration site eg female translator military staff social worker gender adviser n 4", "SentID": 7101 }, { "ParagraphID": 2179, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of FXC who registered for disarmament programme \\n 2. % of weapons collected from FXC \\n 3. Number of female staff who were at weapons-collection and -registration sites (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 4. Number of information campaigns conducted specifically to inform women and girls about DDR programmes", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of FXC who registered for disarmament programme \n 2. % of weapons collected from FXC \n 3. Number of female staff who were at weapons-collection and -registration sites (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \n 4. Number of information campaigns conducted specifically to inform women and girls about DDR programmes", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127855,7 +127855,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2180, - "Paragraph": "Key questions to ask: \\n To what extent did the demobilization programme succeed in demobilizing female ex-combatants and supporters? \\n To what extent did the demobilization programme provide gender-sensitive and female-specific services?", + "Paragraph": "Key questions to ask: \n To what extent did the demobilization programme succeed in demobilizing female ex-combatants and supporters? \n To what extent did the demobilization programme provide gender-sensitive and female-specific services?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127866,14 +127866,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.2. Monitoring of demobilization", - "Sentence": "Key questions to ask: \\n To what extent did the demobilization programme succeed in demobilizing female ex-combatants and supporters?", + "Sentence": "Key questions to ask: \n To what extent did the demobilization programme succeed in demobilizing female ex-combatants and supporters?", "newParagraph": "key question ask n extent demobilization programme succeed demobilizing female excombatants supporter n extent demobilization programme provide gendersensitive femalespecific service", "ProcessedSent": "key question ask n extent demobilization programme succeed demobilizing female excombatants supporter", "SentID": 7103 }, { "ParagraphID": 2180, - "Paragraph": "Key questions to ask: \\n To what extent did the demobilization programme succeed in demobilizing female ex-combatants and supporters? \\n To what extent did the demobilization programme provide gender-sensitive and female-specific services?", + "Paragraph": "Key questions to ask: \n To what extent did the demobilization programme succeed in demobilizing female ex-combatants and supporters? \n To what extent did the demobilization programme provide gender-sensitive and female-specific services?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127884,14 +127884,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.2. Monitoring of demobilization", - "Sentence": "\\n To what extent did the demobilization programme provide gender-sensitive and female-specific services?", + "Sentence": "\n To what extent did the demobilization programme provide gender-sensitive and female-specific services?", "newParagraph": "key question ask n extent demobilization programme succeed demobilizing female excombatants supporter n extent demobilization programme provide gendersensitive femalespecific service", "ProcessedSent": "n extent demobilization programme provide gendersensitive femalespecific service", "SentID": 7104 }, { "ParagraphID": 2181, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \\n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \\n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \\n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \\n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \\n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \\n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \\n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \\n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \\n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \\n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \\n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \\n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127902,14 +127902,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.2. Monitoring of demobilization", - "Sentence": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1.", + "Sentence": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number fxc f registered demobilization programme n 2 fxc f demobilized completed programme per camp n 3 number demobilization facility created specifically fxc f per camp eg toilet clinic n 4 fxc f fd allocated femaleonly accommodation facility n 5 number female staff camp eg female translator military staff social worker gender adviser n 6 number gender training conducted per camp n 510 34 integrated disarmament demobilization reintegration standard 1 august 2006 n 7 average length time spent gender training n 8 number fxc f fd participated gender training n 9 number level genderbased violence reported demobilization camp n 10 average length stay fxc f camp n 11 fxc f fd received transitional support prepare reintegration eg health care food living allowance etc n 12 fxc f fd received femalespecific assistance package eg sanitary napkin female clothes n 13 fxc f fd attending femalespecific counselling session n 14 average length time spent counselling victim genderbased violence n 15 number childcare service per camp n 16 fxc f fd used childcare service per camp n 17 existence medical facility personnel childbirth n 18 fxc f fd used medical facility childbirth", "ProcessedSent": "key measurable indicator n 1", "SentID": 7105 }, { "ParagraphID": 2181, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \\n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \\n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \\n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \\n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \\n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \\n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \\n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \\n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \\n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \\n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \\n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \\n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127920,14 +127920,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.2. Monitoring of demobilization", - "Sentence": "Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \\n 2.", + "Sentence": "Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \n 2.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number fxc f registered demobilization programme n 2 fxc f demobilized completed programme per camp n 3 number demobilization facility created specifically fxc f per camp eg toilet clinic n 4 fxc f fd allocated femaleonly accommodation facility n 5 number female staff camp eg female translator military staff social worker gender adviser n 6 number gender training conducted per camp n 510 34 integrated disarmament demobilization reintegration standard 1 august 2006 n 7 average length time spent gender training n 8 number fxc f fd participated gender training n 9 number level genderbased violence reported demobilization camp n 10 average length stay fxc f camp n 11 fxc f fd received transitional support prepare reintegration eg health care food living allowance etc n 12 fxc f fd received femalespecific assistance package eg sanitary napkin female clothes n 13 fxc f fd attending femalespecific counselling session n 14 average length time spent counselling victim genderbased violence n 15 number childcare service per camp n 16 fxc f fd used childcare service per camp n 17 existence medical facility personnel childbirth n 18 fxc f fd used medical facility childbirth", "ProcessedSent": "number fxc f registered demobilization programme n 2", "SentID": 7106 }, { "ParagraphID": 2181, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \\n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \\n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \\n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \\n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \\n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \\n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \\n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \\n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \\n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \\n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \\n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \\n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127938,14 +127938,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.2. Monitoring of demobilization", - "Sentence": "% of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \\n 3.", + "Sentence": "% of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \n 3.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number fxc f registered demobilization programme n 2 fxc f demobilized completed programme per camp n 3 number demobilization facility created specifically fxc f per camp eg toilet clinic n 4 fxc f fd allocated femaleonly accommodation facility n 5 number female staff camp eg female translator military staff social worker gender adviser n 6 number gender training conducted per camp n 510 34 integrated disarmament demobilization reintegration standard 1 august 2006 n 7 average length time spent gender training n 8 number fxc f fd participated gender training n 9 number level genderbased violence reported demobilization camp n 10 average length stay fxc f camp n 11 fxc f fd received transitional support prepare reintegration eg health care food living allowance etc n 12 fxc f fd received femalespecific assistance package eg sanitary napkin female clothes n 13 fxc f fd attending femalespecific counselling session n 14 average length time spent counselling victim genderbased violence n 15 number childcare service per camp n 16 fxc f fd used childcare service per camp n 17 existence medical facility personnel childbirth n 18 fxc f fd used medical facility childbirth", "ProcessedSent": " fxc f demobilized completed programme per camp n 3", "SentID": 7107 }, { "ParagraphID": 2181, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \\n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \\n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \\n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \\n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \\n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \\n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \\n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \\n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \\n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \\n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \\n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \\n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127956,14 +127956,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.2. Monitoring of demobilization", - "Sentence": "Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \\n 4.", + "Sentence": "Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \n 4.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number fxc f registered demobilization programme n 2 fxc f demobilized completed programme per camp n 3 number demobilization facility created specifically fxc f per camp eg toilet clinic n 4 fxc f fd allocated femaleonly accommodation facility n 5 number female staff camp eg female translator military staff social worker gender adviser n 6 number gender training conducted per camp n 510 34 integrated disarmament demobilization reintegration standard 1 august 2006 n 7 average length time spent gender training n 8 number fxc f fd participated gender training n 9 number level genderbased violence reported demobilization camp n 10 average length stay fxc f camp n 11 fxc f fd received transitional support prepare reintegration eg health care food living allowance etc n 12 fxc f fd received femalespecific assistance package eg sanitary napkin female clothes n 13 fxc f fd attending femalespecific counselling session n 14 average length time spent counselling victim genderbased violence n 15 number childcare service per camp n 16 fxc f fd used childcare service per camp n 17 existence medical facility personnel childbirth n 18 fxc f fd used medical facility childbirth", "ProcessedSent": "number demobilization facility created specifically fxc f per camp eg toilet clinic n 4", "SentID": 7108 }, { "ParagraphID": 2181, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \\n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \\n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \\n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \\n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \\n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \\n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \\n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \\n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \\n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \\n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \\n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \\n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127974,14 +127974,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.2. Monitoring of demobilization", - "Sentence": "% of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \\n 5.", + "Sentence": "% of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \n 5.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number fxc f registered demobilization programme n 2 fxc f demobilized completed programme per camp n 3 number demobilization facility created specifically fxc f per camp eg toilet clinic n 4 fxc f fd allocated femaleonly accommodation facility n 5 number female staff camp eg female translator military staff social worker gender adviser n 6 number gender training conducted per camp n 510 34 integrated disarmament demobilization reintegration standard 1 august 2006 n 7 average length time spent gender training n 8 number fxc f fd participated gender training n 9 number level genderbased violence reported demobilization camp n 10 average length stay fxc f camp n 11 fxc f fd received transitional support prepare reintegration eg health care food living allowance etc n 12 fxc f fd received femalespecific assistance package eg sanitary napkin female clothes n 13 fxc f fd attending femalespecific counselling session n 14 average length time spent counselling victim genderbased violence n 15 number childcare service per camp n 16 fxc f fd used childcare service per camp n 17 existence medical facility personnel childbirth n 18 fxc f fd used medical facility childbirth", "ProcessedSent": " fxc f fd allocated femaleonly accommodation facility n 5", "SentID": 7109 }, { "ParagraphID": 2181, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \\n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \\n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \\n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \\n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \\n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \\n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \\n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \\n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \\n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \\n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \\n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \\n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -127992,14 +127992,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.2. Monitoring of demobilization", - "Sentence": "Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 6.", + "Sentence": "Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \n 6.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number fxc f registered demobilization programme n 2 fxc f demobilized completed programme per camp n 3 number demobilization facility created specifically fxc f per camp eg toilet clinic n 4 fxc f fd allocated femaleonly accommodation facility n 5 number female staff camp eg female translator military staff social worker gender adviser n 6 number gender training conducted per camp n 510 34 integrated disarmament demobilization reintegration standard 1 august 2006 n 7 average length time spent gender training n 8 number fxc f fd participated gender training n 9 number level genderbased violence reported demobilization camp n 10 average length stay fxc f camp n 11 fxc f fd received transitional support prepare reintegration eg health care food living allowance etc n 12 fxc f fd received femalespecific assistance package eg sanitary napkin female clothes n 13 fxc f fd attending femalespecific counselling session n 14 average length time spent counselling victim genderbased violence n 15 number childcare service per camp n 16 fxc f fd used childcare service per camp n 17 existence medical facility personnel childbirth n 18 fxc f fd used medical facility childbirth", "ProcessedSent": "number female staff camp eg female translator military staff social worker gender adviser n 6", "SentID": 7110 }, { "ParagraphID": 2181, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \\n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \\n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \\n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \\n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \\n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \\n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \\n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \\n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \\n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \\n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \\n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \\n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128010,14 +128010,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.2. Monitoring of demobilization", - "Sentence": "Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \\n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \\n 7.", + "Sentence": "Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \n 7.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number fxc f registered demobilization programme n 2 fxc f demobilized completed programme per camp n 3 number demobilization facility created specifically fxc f per camp eg toilet clinic n 4 fxc f fd allocated femaleonly accommodation facility n 5 number female staff camp eg female translator military staff social worker gender adviser n 6 number gender training conducted per camp n 510 34 integrated disarmament demobilization reintegration standard 1 august 2006 n 7 average length time spent gender training n 8 number fxc f fd participated gender training n 9 number level genderbased violence reported demobilization camp n 10 average length stay fxc f camp n 11 fxc f fd received transitional support prepare reintegration eg health care food living allowance etc n 12 fxc f fd received femalespecific assistance package eg sanitary napkin female clothes n 13 fxc f fd attending femalespecific counselling session n 14 average length time spent counselling victim genderbased violence n 15 number childcare service per camp n 16 fxc f fd used childcare service per camp n 17 existence medical facility personnel childbirth n 18 fxc f fd used medical facility childbirth", "ProcessedSent": "number gender training conducted per camp n 510 34 integrated disarmament demobilization reintegration standard 1 august 2006 n 7", "SentID": 7111 }, { "ParagraphID": 2181, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \\n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \\n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \\n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \\n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \\n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \\n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \\n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \\n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \\n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \\n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \\n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \\n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128028,14 +128028,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.2. Monitoring of demobilization", - "Sentence": "Average length of time spent in gender training \\n 8.", + "Sentence": "Average length of time spent in gender training \n 8.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number fxc f registered demobilization programme n 2 fxc f demobilized completed programme per camp n 3 number demobilization facility created specifically fxc f per camp eg toilet clinic n 4 fxc f fd allocated femaleonly accommodation facility n 5 number female staff camp eg female translator military staff social worker gender adviser n 6 number gender training conducted per camp n 510 34 integrated disarmament demobilization reintegration standard 1 august 2006 n 7 average length time spent gender training n 8 number fxc f fd participated gender training n 9 number level genderbased violence reported demobilization camp n 10 average length stay fxc f camp n 11 fxc f fd received transitional support prepare reintegration eg health care food living allowance etc n 12 fxc f fd received femalespecific assistance package eg sanitary napkin female clothes n 13 fxc f fd attending femalespecific counselling session n 14 average length time spent counselling victim genderbased violence n 15 number childcare service per camp n 16 fxc f fd used childcare service per camp n 17 existence medical facility personnel childbirth n 18 fxc f fd used medical facility childbirth", "ProcessedSent": "average length time spent gender training n 8", "SentID": 7112 }, { "ParagraphID": 2181, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \\n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \\n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \\n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \\n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \\n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \\n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \\n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \\n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \\n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \\n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \\n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \\n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128046,14 +128046,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.2. Monitoring of demobilization", - "Sentence": "Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \\n 9.", + "Sentence": "Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \n 9.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number fxc f registered demobilization programme n 2 fxc f demobilized completed programme per camp n 3 number demobilization facility created specifically fxc f per camp eg toilet clinic n 4 fxc f fd allocated femaleonly accommodation facility n 5 number female staff camp eg female translator military staff social worker gender adviser n 6 number gender training conducted per camp n 510 34 integrated disarmament demobilization reintegration standard 1 august 2006 n 7 average length time spent gender training n 8 number fxc f fd participated gender training n 9 number level genderbased violence reported demobilization camp n 10 average length stay fxc f camp n 11 fxc f fd received transitional support prepare reintegration eg health care food living allowance etc n 12 fxc f fd received femalespecific assistance package eg sanitary napkin female clothes n 13 fxc f fd attending femalespecific counselling session n 14 average length time spent counselling victim genderbased violence n 15 number childcare service per camp n 16 fxc f fd used childcare service per camp n 17 existence medical facility personnel childbirth n 18 fxc f fd used medical facility childbirth", "ProcessedSent": "number fxc f fd participated gender training n 9", "SentID": 7113 }, { "ParagraphID": 2181, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \\n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \\n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \\n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \\n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \\n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \\n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \\n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \\n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \\n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \\n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \\n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \\n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128064,14 +128064,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.2. Monitoring of demobilization", - "Sentence": "Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \\n 10.", + "Sentence": "Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \n 10.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number fxc f registered demobilization programme n 2 fxc f demobilized completed programme per camp n 3 number demobilization facility created specifically fxc f per camp eg toilet clinic n 4 fxc f fd allocated femaleonly accommodation facility n 5 number female staff camp eg female translator military staff social worker gender adviser n 6 number gender training conducted per camp n 510 34 integrated disarmament demobilization reintegration standard 1 august 2006 n 7 average length time spent gender training n 8 number fxc f fd participated gender training n 9 number level genderbased violence reported demobilization camp n 10 average length stay fxc f camp n 11 fxc f fd received transitional support prepare reintegration eg health care food living allowance etc n 12 fxc f fd received femalespecific assistance package eg sanitary napkin female clothes n 13 fxc f fd attending femalespecific counselling session n 14 average length time spent counselling victim genderbased violence n 15 number childcare service per camp n 16 fxc f fd used childcare service per camp n 17 existence medical facility personnel childbirth n 18 fxc f fd used medical facility childbirth", "ProcessedSent": "number level genderbased violence reported demobilization camp n 10", "SentID": 7114 }, { "ParagraphID": 2181, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \\n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \\n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \\n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \\n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \\n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \\n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \\n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \\n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \\n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \\n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \\n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \\n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128082,14 +128082,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.2. Monitoring of demobilization", - "Sentence": "Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \\n 11.", + "Sentence": "Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \n 11.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number fxc f registered demobilization programme n 2 fxc f demobilized completed programme per camp n 3 number demobilization facility created specifically fxc f per camp eg toilet clinic n 4 fxc f fd allocated femaleonly accommodation facility n 5 number female staff camp eg female translator military staff social worker gender adviser n 6 number gender training conducted per camp n 510 34 integrated disarmament demobilization reintegration standard 1 august 2006 n 7 average length time spent gender training n 8 number fxc f fd participated gender training n 9 number level genderbased violence reported demobilization camp n 10 average length stay fxc f camp n 11 fxc f fd received transitional support prepare reintegration eg health care food living allowance etc n 12 fxc f fd received femalespecific assistance package eg sanitary napkin female clothes n 13 fxc f fd attending femalespecific counselling session n 14 average length time spent counselling victim genderbased violence n 15 number childcare service per camp n 16 fxc f fd used childcare service per camp n 17 existence medical facility personnel childbirth n 18 fxc f fd used medical facility childbirth", "ProcessedSent": "average length stay fxc f camp n 11", "SentID": 7115 }, { "ParagraphID": 2181, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \\n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \\n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \\n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \\n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \\n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \\n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \\n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \\n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \\n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \\n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \\n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \\n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128107,7 +128107,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2181, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \\n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \\n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \\n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \\n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \\n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \\n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \\n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \\n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \\n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \\n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \\n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \\n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128125,7 +128125,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2181, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \\n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \\n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \\n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \\n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \\n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \\n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \\n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \\n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \\n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \\n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \\n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \\n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128136,14 +128136,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.2. Monitoring of demobilization", - "Sentence": "\\n 12.", + "Sentence": "\n 12.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number fxc f registered demobilization programme n 2 fxc f demobilized completed programme per camp n 3 number demobilization facility created specifically fxc f per camp eg toilet clinic n 4 fxc f fd allocated femaleonly accommodation facility n 5 number female staff camp eg female translator military staff social worker gender adviser n 6 number gender training conducted per camp n 510 34 integrated disarmament demobilization reintegration standard 1 august 2006 n 7 average length time spent gender training n 8 number fxc f fd participated gender training n 9 number level genderbased violence reported demobilization camp n 10 average length stay fxc f camp n 11 fxc f fd received transitional support prepare reintegration eg health care food living allowance etc n 12 fxc f fd received femalespecific assistance package eg sanitary napkin female clothes n 13 fxc f fd attending femalespecific counselling session n 14 average length time spent counselling victim genderbased violence n 15 number childcare service per camp n 16 fxc f fd used childcare service per camp n 17 existence medical facility personnel childbirth n 18 fxc f fd used medical facility childbirth", "ProcessedSent": "n 12", "SentID": 7118 }, { "ParagraphID": 2181, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \\n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \\n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \\n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \\n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \\n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \\n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \\n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \\n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \\n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \\n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \\n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \\n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128154,14 +128154,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.2. Monitoring of demobilization", - "Sentence": "% of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \\n 13.", + "Sentence": "% of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \n 13.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number fxc f registered demobilization programme n 2 fxc f demobilized completed programme per camp n 3 number demobilization facility created specifically fxc f per camp eg toilet clinic n 4 fxc f fd allocated femaleonly accommodation facility n 5 number female staff camp eg female translator military staff social worker gender adviser n 6 number gender training conducted per camp n 510 34 integrated disarmament demobilization reintegration standard 1 august 2006 n 7 average length time spent gender training n 8 number fxc f fd participated gender training n 9 number level genderbased violence reported demobilization camp n 10 average length stay fxc f camp n 11 fxc f fd received transitional support prepare reintegration eg health care food living allowance etc n 12 fxc f fd received femalespecific assistance package eg sanitary napkin female clothes n 13 fxc f fd attending femalespecific counselling session n 14 average length time spent counselling victim genderbased violence n 15 number childcare service per camp n 16 fxc f fd used childcare service per camp n 17 existence medical facility personnel childbirth n 18 fxc f fd used medical facility childbirth", "ProcessedSent": " fxc f fd received femalespecific assistance package eg sanitary napkin female clothes n 13", "SentID": 7119 }, { "ParagraphID": 2181, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \\n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \\n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \\n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \\n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \\n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \\n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \\n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \\n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \\n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \\n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \\n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \\n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128172,14 +128172,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.2. Monitoring of demobilization", - "Sentence": "% of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \\n 14.", + "Sentence": "% of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \n 14.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number fxc f registered demobilization programme n 2 fxc f demobilized completed programme per camp n 3 number demobilization facility created specifically fxc f per camp eg toilet clinic n 4 fxc f fd allocated femaleonly accommodation facility n 5 number female staff camp eg female translator military staff social worker gender adviser n 6 number gender training conducted per camp n 510 34 integrated disarmament demobilization reintegration standard 1 august 2006 n 7 average length time spent gender training n 8 number fxc f fd participated gender training n 9 number level genderbased violence reported demobilization camp n 10 average length stay fxc f camp n 11 fxc f fd received transitional support prepare reintegration eg health care food living allowance etc n 12 fxc f fd received femalespecific assistance package eg sanitary napkin female clothes n 13 fxc f fd attending femalespecific counselling session n 14 average length time spent counselling victim genderbased violence n 15 number childcare service per camp n 16 fxc f fd used childcare service per camp n 17 existence medical facility personnel childbirth n 18 fxc f fd used medical facility childbirth", "ProcessedSent": " fxc f fd attending femalespecific counselling session n 14", "SentID": 7120 }, { "ParagraphID": 2181, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \\n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \\n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \\n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \\n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \\n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \\n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \\n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \\n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \\n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \\n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \\n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \\n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128190,14 +128190,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.2. Monitoring of demobilization", - "Sentence": "Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \\n 15.", + "Sentence": "Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \n 15.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number fxc f registered demobilization programme n 2 fxc f demobilized completed programme per camp n 3 number demobilization facility created specifically fxc f per camp eg toilet clinic n 4 fxc f fd allocated femaleonly accommodation facility n 5 number female staff camp eg female translator military staff social worker gender adviser n 6 number gender training conducted per camp n 510 34 integrated disarmament demobilization reintegration standard 1 august 2006 n 7 average length time spent gender training n 8 number fxc f fd participated gender training n 9 number level genderbased violence reported demobilization camp n 10 average length stay fxc f camp n 11 fxc f fd received transitional support prepare reintegration eg health care food living allowance etc n 12 fxc f fd received femalespecific assistance package eg sanitary napkin female clothes n 13 fxc f fd attending femalespecific counselling session n 14 average length time spent counselling victim genderbased violence n 15 number childcare service per camp n 16 fxc f fd used childcare service per camp n 17 existence medical facility personnel childbirth n 18 fxc f fd used medical facility childbirth", "ProcessedSent": "average length time spent counselling victim genderbased violence n 15", "SentID": 7121 }, { "ParagraphID": 2181, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \\n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \\n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \\n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \\n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \\n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \\n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \\n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \\n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \\n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \\n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \\n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \\n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128208,14 +128208,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.2. Monitoring of demobilization", - "Sentence": "Number of child-care services per camp \\n 16.", + "Sentence": "Number of child-care services per camp \n 16.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number fxc f registered demobilization programme n 2 fxc f demobilized completed programme per camp n 3 number demobilization facility created specifically fxc f per camp eg toilet clinic n 4 fxc f fd allocated femaleonly accommodation facility n 5 number female staff camp eg female translator military staff social worker gender adviser n 6 number gender training conducted per camp n 510 34 integrated disarmament demobilization reintegration standard 1 august 2006 n 7 average length time spent gender training n 8 number fxc f fd participated gender training n 9 number level genderbased violence reported demobilization camp n 10 average length stay fxc f camp n 11 fxc f fd received transitional support prepare reintegration eg health care food living allowance etc n 12 fxc f fd received femalespecific assistance package eg sanitary napkin female clothes n 13 fxc f fd attending femalespecific counselling session n 14 average length time spent counselling victim genderbased violence n 15 number childcare service per camp n 16 fxc f fd used childcare service per camp n 17 existence medical facility personnel childbirth n 18 fxc f fd used medical facility childbirth", "ProcessedSent": "number childcare service per camp n 16", "SentID": 7122 }, { "ParagraphID": 2181, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \\n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \\n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \\n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \\n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \\n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \\n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \\n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \\n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \\n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \\n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \\n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \\n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128226,14 +128226,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.2. Monitoring of demobilization", - "Sentence": "% of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \\n 17.", + "Sentence": "% of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \n 17.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number fxc f registered demobilization programme n 2 fxc f demobilized completed programme per camp n 3 number demobilization facility created specifically fxc f per camp eg toilet clinic n 4 fxc f fd allocated femaleonly accommodation facility n 5 number female staff camp eg female translator military staff social worker gender adviser n 6 number gender training conducted per camp n 510 34 integrated disarmament demobilization reintegration standard 1 august 2006 n 7 average length time spent gender training n 8 number fxc f fd participated gender training n 9 number level genderbased violence reported demobilization camp n 10 average length stay fxc f camp n 11 fxc f fd received transitional support prepare reintegration eg health care food living allowance etc n 12 fxc f fd received femalespecific assistance package eg sanitary napkin female clothes n 13 fxc f fd attending femalespecific counselling session n 14 average length time spent counselling victim genderbased violence n 15 number childcare service per camp n 16 fxc f fd used childcare service per camp n 17 existence medical facility personnel childbirth n 18 fxc f fd used medical facility childbirth", "ProcessedSent": " fxc f fd used childcare service per camp n 17", "SentID": 7123 }, { "ParagraphID": 2181, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \\n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \\n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \\n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \\n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \\n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \\n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \\n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \\n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \\n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \\n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \\n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \\n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128244,14 +128244,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.2. Monitoring of demobilization", - "Sentence": "Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \\n 18.", + "Sentence": "Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \n 18.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number fxc f registered demobilization programme n 2 fxc f demobilized completed programme per camp n 3 number demobilization facility created specifically fxc f per camp eg toilet clinic n 4 fxc f fd allocated femaleonly accommodation facility n 5 number female staff camp eg female translator military staff social worker gender adviser n 6 number gender training conducted per camp n 510 34 integrated disarmament demobilization reintegration standard 1 august 2006 n 7 average length time spent gender training n 8 number fxc f fd participated gender training n 9 number level genderbased violence reported demobilization camp n 10 average length stay fxc f camp n 11 fxc f fd received transitional support prepare reintegration eg health care food living allowance etc n 12 fxc f fd received femalespecific assistance package eg sanitary napkin female clothes n 13 fxc f fd attending femalespecific counselling session n 14 average length time spent counselling victim genderbased violence n 15 number childcare service per camp n 16 fxc f fd used childcare service per camp n 17 existence medical facility personnel childbirth n 18 fxc f fd used medical facility childbirth", "ProcessedSent": "existence medical facility personnel childbirth n 18", "SentID": 7124 }, { "ParagraphID": 2181, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \\n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \\n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \\n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \\n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \\n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \\n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \\n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \\n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \\n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \\n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \\n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \\n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of FXC and FS who registered for demobilization programme \n 2. % of FXC and FS who were demobilized (completed the programme) per camp \n 3. Number of demobilization facilities created specifically for FXC and FS per camp (e.g., toilets, clinic) \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who were allocated to female-only accommodation facilities \n 5. Number of female staff in each camp (e.g., female translators, military staff, social workers, gender advisers) \n 6. Number of gender trainings conducted per camp \n 5.10 34\u2003Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards 1 August 2006 \n 7. Average length of time spent in gender training \n 8. Number of FXC, FS and FD who participated in gender training \n 9. Number and level of gender-based violence reported in each demobilization camp \n 10. Average length of stay of FXC and FS at each camp \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who received transitional support to prepare for reintegration (e.g. health care, food, living allowance, etc.) \n 12. % of FXC, FS and FD who received female-specific assistance and package (e.g., sanitary napkins, female clothes) \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD attending female-specific counselling sessions \n 14. Average length of time spent in counselling for victims of gender-based violence \n 15. Number of child-care services per camp \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who used child-care services per camp \n 17. Existence of medical facilities and personnel for childbirth \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who used medical facilities for childbirth", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128269,7 +128269,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2182, - "Paragraph": "Key questions to ask: \\n To what extent did the reintegration programme succeed in reintegrating female ex- combatants, supporters and dependants? \\n To what extent did the reintegration programme provide gender-sensitive and female- specific services?", + "Paragraph": "Key questions to ask: \n To what extent did the reintegration programme succeed in reintegrating female ex- combatants, supporters and dependants? \n To what extent did the reintegration programme provide gender-sensitive and female- specific services?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128280,14 +128280,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.3. Monitoring of reintegration", - "Sentence": "Key questions to ask: \\n To what extent did the reintegration programme succeed in reintegrating female ex- combatants, supporters and dependants?", + "Sentence": "Key questions to ask: \n To what extent did the reintegration programme succeed in reintegrating female ex- combatants, supporters and dependants?", "newParagraph": "key question ask n extent reintegration programme succeed reintegrating female ex combatant supporter dependant n extent reintegration programme provide gendersensitive female specific service", "ProcessedSent": "key question ask n extent reintegration programme succeed reintegrating female ex combatant supporter dependant", "SentID": 7126 }, { "ParagraphID": 2182, - "Paragraph": "Key questions to ask: \\n To what extent did the reintegration programme succeed in reintegrating female ex- combatants, supporters and dependants? \\n To what extent did the reintegration programme provide gender-sensitive and female- specific services?", + "Paragraph": "Key questions to ask: \n To what extent did the reintegration programme succeed in reintegrating female ex- combatants, supporters and dependants? \n To what extent did the reintegration programme provide gender-sensitive and female- specific services?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128298,14 +128298,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.3. Monitoring of reintegration", - "Sentence": "\\n To what extent did the reintegration programme provide gender-sensitive and female- specific services?", + "Sentence": "\n To what extent did the reintegration programme provide gender-sensitive and female- specific services?", "newParagraph": "key question ask n extent reintegration programme succeed reintegrating female ex combatant supporter dependant n extent reintegration programme provide gendersensitive female specific service", "ProcessedSent": "n extent reintegration programme provide gendersensitive female specific service", "SentID": 7127 }, { "ParagraphID": 2183, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \\n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \\n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \\n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \\n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \\n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \\n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \\n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \\n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \\n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \\n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \\n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \\n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \\n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \\n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \\n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128316,14 +128316,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.3. Monitoring of reintegration", - "Sentence": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1.", + "Sentence": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform community member issue associated fxc f fd n 2 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform female community member eg wife male excombatants benefit n 3 number fxc f fd registered reintegration programme n 4 fxc f fd returned home community n 5 fxc f fd went new place rather home community n 6 number femalespecific transportation service available n 7 fxc f fd used transportation service return community n 8 number vocational training implemented fxc f andor fd n 9 fxc f fd registered vocational training n 10 average length time spent vocational training n 11 fxc f fd completed vocational training n 12 fxc f incorporated national army police n 13 fxc f fd gained ownership land andor property n 14 number microcredit project implemented fxc f andor fd n 15 fxc f fd received microcredit n 16 fxc f fd started incomegenerating activity based microcredit n 17 number literacy programme implemented fxc f andor fd n 18 fxc f fd completed literacy programme n 19 number childcare service created fxc f fd attend training n 20 fxc f fd use childcare service n 21 number communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies conducted fxc f fd n 22 fxc f fd attended communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies n 23 number female staff community eg female translator social worker gender adviser n 24 number support network created fxc f fd n 25 fxc f fd joined support network", "ProcessedSent": "key measurable indicator n 1", "SentID": 7128 }, { "ParagraphID": 2183, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \\n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \\n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \\n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \\n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \\n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \\n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \\n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \\n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \\n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \\n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \\n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \\n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \\n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \\n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \\n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128334,14 +128334,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.3. Monitoring of reintegration", - "Sentence": "Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \\n 2.", + "Sentence": "Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \n 2.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform community member issue associated fxc f fd n 2 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform female community member eg wife male excombatants benefit n 3 number fxc f fd registered reintegration programme n 4 fxc f fd returned home community n 5 fxc f fd went new place rather home community n 6 number femalespecific transportation service available n 7 fxc f fd used transportation service return community n 8 number vocational training implemented fxc f andor fd n 9 fxc f fd registered vocational training n 10 average length time spent vocational training n 11 fxc f fd completed vocational training n 12 fxc f incorporated national army police n 13 fxc f fd gained ownership land andor property n 14 number microcredit project implemented fxc f andor fd n 15 fxc f fd received microcredit n 16 fxc f fd started incomegenerating activity based microcredit n 17 number literacy programme implemented fxc f andor fd n 18 fxc f fd completed literacy programme n 19 number childcare service created fxc f fd attend training n 20 fxc f fd use childcare service n 21 number communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies conducted fxc f fd n 22 fxc f fd attended communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies n 23 number female staff community eg female translator social worker gender adviser n 24 number support network created fxc f fd n 25 fxc f fd joined support network", "ProcessedSent": "number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform community member issue associated fxc f fd n 2", "SentID": 7129 }, { "ParagraphID": 2183, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \\n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \\n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \\n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \\n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \\n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \\n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \\n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \\n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \\n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \\n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \\n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \\n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \\n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \\n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \\n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128352,14 +128352,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.3. Monitoring of reintegration", - "Sentence": "Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \\n 3.", + "Sentence": "Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \n 3.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform community member issue associated fxc f fd n 2 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform female community member eg wife male excombatants benefit n 3 number fxc f fd registered reintegration programme n 4 fxc f fd returned home community n 5 fxc f fd went new place rather home community n 6 number femalespecific transportation service available n 7 fxc f fd used transportation service return community n 8 number vocational training implemented fxc f andor fd n 9 fxc f fd registered vocational training n 10 average length time spent vocational training n 11 fxc f fd completed vocational training n 12 fxc f incorporated national army police n 13 fxc f fd gained ownership land andor property n 14 number microcredit project implemented fxc f andor fd n 15 fxc f fd received microcredit n 16 fxc f fd started incomegenerating activity based microcredit n 17 number literacy programme implemented fxc f andor fd n 18 fxc f fd completed literacy programme n 19 number childcare service created fxc f fd attend training n 20 fxc f fd use childcare service n 21 number communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies conducted fxc f fd n 22 fxc f fd attended communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies n 23 number female staff community eg female translator social worker gender adviser n 24 number support network created fxc f fd n 25 fxc f fd joined support network", "ProcessedSent": "number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform female community member eg wife male excombatants benefit n 3", "SentID": 7130 }, { "ParagraphID": 2183, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \\n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \\n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \\n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \\n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \\n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \\n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \\n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \\n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \\n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \\n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \\n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \\n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \\n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \\n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \\n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128370,14 +128370,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.3. Monitoring of reintegration", - "Sentence": "Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \\n 4.", + "Sentence": "Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \n 4.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform community member issue associated fxc f fd n 2 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform female community member eg wife male excombatants benefit n 3 number fxc f fd registered reintegration programme n 4 fxc f fd returned home community n 5 fxc f fd went new place rather home community n 6 number femalespecific transportation service available n 7 fxc f fd used transportation service return community n 8 number vocational training implemented fxc f andor fd n 9 fxc f fd registered vocational training n 10 average length time spent vocational training n 11 fxc f fd completed vocational training n 12 fxc f incorporated national army police n 13 fxc f fd gained ownership land andor property n 14 number microcredit project implemented fxc f andor fd n 15 fxc f fd received microcredit n 16 fxc f fd started incomegenerating activity based microcredit n 17 number literacy programme implemented fxc f andor fd n 18 fxc f fd completed literacy programme n 19 number childcare service created fxc f fd attend training n 20 fxc f fd use childcare service n 21 number communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies conducted fxc f fd n 22 fxc f fd attended communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies n 23 number female staff community eg female translator social worker gender adviser n 24 number support network created fxc f fd n 25 fxc f fd joined support network", "ProcessedSent": "number fxc f fd registered reintegration programme n 4", "SentID": 7131 }, { "ParagraphID": 2183, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \\n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \\n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \\n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \\n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \\n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \\n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \\n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \\n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \\n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \\n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \\n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \\n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \\n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \\n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \\n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128388,14 +128388,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.3. Monitoring of reintegration", - "Sentence": "% of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \\n 5.", + "Sentence": "% of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \n 5.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform community member issue associated fxc f fd n 2 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform female community member eg wife male excombatants benefit n 3 number fxc f fd registered reintegration programme n 4 fxc f fd returned home community n 5 fxc f fd went new place rather home community n 6 number femalespecific transportation service available n 7 fxc f fd used transportation service return community n 8 number vocational training implemented fxc f andor fd n 9 fxc f fd registered vocational training n 10 average length time spent vocational training n 11 fxc f fd completed vocational training n 12 fxc f incorporated national army police n 13 fxc f fd gained ownership land andor property n 14 number microcredit project implemented fxc f andor fd n 15 fxc f fd received microcredit n 16 fxc f fd started incomegenerating activity based microcredit n 17 number literacy programme implemented fxc f andor fd n 18 fxc f fd completed literacy programme n 19 number childcare service created fxc f fd attend training n 20 fxc f fd use childcare service n 21 number communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies conducted fxc f fd n 22 fxc f fd attended communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies n 23 number female staff community eg female translator social worker gender adviser n 24 number support network created fxc f fd n 25 fxc f fd joined support network", "ProcessedSent": " fxc f fd returned home community n 5", "SentID": 7132 }, { "ParagraphID": 2183, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \\n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \\n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \\n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \\n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \\n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \\n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \\n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \\n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \\n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \\n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \\n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \\n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \\n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \\n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \\n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128406,14 +128406,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.3. Monitoring of reintegration", - "Sentence": "% of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \\n 6.", + "Sentence": "% of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \n 6.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform community member issue associated fxc f fd n 2 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform female community member eg wife male excombatants benefit n 3 number fxc f fd registered reintegration programme n 4 fxc f fd returned home community n 5 fxc f fd went new place rather home community n 6 number femalespecific transportation service available n 7 fxc f fd used transportation service return community n 8 number vocational training implemented fxc f andor fd n 9 fxc f fd registered vocational training n 10 average length time spent vocational training n 11 fxc f fd completed vocational training n 12 fxc f incorporated national army police n 13 fxc f fd gained ownership land andor property n 14 number microcredit project implemented fxc f andor fd n 15 fxc f fd received microcredit n 16 fxc f fd started incomegenerating activity based microcredit n 17 number literacy programme implemented fxc f andor fd n 18 fxc f fd completed literacy programme n 19 number childcare service created fxc f fd attend training n 20 fxc f fd use childcare service n 21 number communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies conducted fxc f fd n 22 fxc f fd attended communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies n 23 number female staff community eg female translator social worker gender adviser n 24 number support network created fxc f fd n 25 fxc f fd joined support network", "ProcessedSent": " fxc f fd went new place rather home community n 6", "SentID": 7133 }, { "ParagraphID": 2183, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \\n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \\n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \\n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \\n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \\n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \\n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \\n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \\n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \\n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \\n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \\n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \\n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \\n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \\n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \\n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128424,14 +128424,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.3. Monitoring of reintegration", - "Sentence": "Number of female-specific transportation services available \\n 7.", + "Sentence": "Number of female-specific transportation services available \n 7.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform community member issue associated fxc f fd n 2 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform female community member eg wife male excombatants benefit n 3 number fxc f fd registered reintegration programme n 4 fxc f fd returned home community n 5 fxc f fd went new place rather home community n 6 number femalespecific transportation service available n 7 fxc f fd used transportation service return community n 8 number vocational training implemented fxc f andor fd n 9 fxc f fd registered vocational training n 10 average length time spent vocational training n 11 fxc f fd completed vocational training n 12 fxc f incorporated national army police n 13 fxc f fd gained ownership land andor property n 14 number microcredit project implemented fxc f andor fd n 15 fxc f fd received microcredit n 16 fxc f fd started incomegenerating activity based microcredit n 17 number literacy programme implemented fxc f andor fd n 18 fxc f fd completed literacy programme n 19 number childcare service created fxc f fd attend training n 20 fxc f fd use childcare service n 21 number communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies conducted fxc f fd n 22 fxc f fd attended communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies n 23 number female staff community eg female translator social worker gender adviser n 24 number support network created fxc f fd n 25 fxc f fd joined support network", "ProcessedSent": "number femalespecific transportation service available n 7", "SentID": 7134 }, { "ParagraphID": 2183, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \\n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \\n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \\n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \\n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \\n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \\n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \\n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \\n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \\n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \\n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \\n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \\n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \\n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \\n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \\n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128442,14 +128442,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.3. Monitoring of reintegration", - "Sentence": "% of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \\n 8.", + "Sentence": "% of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \n 8.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform community member issue associated fxc f fd n 2 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform female community member eg wife male excombatants benefit n 3 number fxc f fd registered reintegration programme n 4 fxc f fd returned home community n 5 fxc f fd went new place rather home community n 6 number femalespecific transportation service available n 7 fxc f fd used transportation service return community n 8 number vocational training implemented fxc f andor fd n 9 fxc f fd registered vocational training n 10 average length time spent vocational training n 11 fxc f fd completed vocational training n 12 fxc f incorporated national army police n 13 fxc f fd gained ownership land andor property n 14 number microcredit project implemented fxc f andor fd n 15 fxc f fd received microcredit n 16 fxc f fd started incomegenerating activity based microcredit n 17 number literacy programme implemented fxc f andor fd n 18 fxc f fd completed literacy programme n 19 number childcare service created fxc f fd attend training n 20 fxc f fd use childcare service n 21 number communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies conducted fxc f fd n 22 fxc f fd attended communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies n 23 number female staff community eg female translator social worker gender adviser n 24 number support network created fxc f fd n 25 fxc f fd joined support network", "ProcessedSent": " fxc f fd used transportation service return community n 8", "SentID": 7135 }, { "ParagraphID": 2183, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \\n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \\n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \\n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \\n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \\n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \\n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \\n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \\n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \\n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \\n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \\n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \\n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \\n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \\n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \\n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128460,14 +128460,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.3. Monitoring of reintegration", - "Sentence": "Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 9.", + "Sentence": "Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 9.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform community member issue associated fxc f fd n 2 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform female community member eg wife male excombatants benefit n 3 number fxc f fd registered reintegration programme n 4 fxc f fd returned home community n 5 fxc f fd went new place rather home community n 6 number femalespecific transportation service available n 7 fxc f fd used transportation service return community n 8 number vocational training implemented fxc f andor fd n 9 fxc f fd registered vocational training n 10 average length time spent vocational training n 11 fxc f fd completed vocational training n 12 fxc f incorporated national army police n 13 fxc f fd gained ownership land andor property n 14 number microcredit project implemented fxc f andor fd n 15 fxc f fd received microcredit n 16 fxc f fd started incomegenerating activity based microcredit n 17 number literacy programme implemented fxc f andor fd n 18 fxc f fd completed literacy programme n 19 number childcare service created fxc f fd attend training n 20 fxc f fd use childcare service n 21 number communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies conducted fxc f fd n 22 fxc f fd attended communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies n 23 number female staff community eg female translator social worker gender adviser n 24 number support network created fxc f fd n 25 fxc f fd joined support network", "ProcessedSent": "number vocational training implemented fxc f andor fd n 9", "SentID": 7136 }, { "ParagraphID": 2183, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \\n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \\n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \\n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \\n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \\n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \\n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \\n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \\n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \\n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \\n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \\n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \\n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \\n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \\n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \\n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128478,14 +128478,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.3. Monitoring of reintegration", - "Sentence": "% of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \\n 10.", + "Sentence": "% of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \n 10.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform community member issue associated fxc f fd n 2 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform female community member eg wife male excombatants benefit n 3 number fxc f fd registered reintegration programme n 4 fxc f fd returned home community n 5 fxc f fd went new place rather home community n 6 number femalespecific transportation service available n 7 fxc f fd used transportation service return community n 8 number vocational training implemented fxc f andor fd n 9 fxc f fd registered vocational training n 10 average length time spent vocational training n 11 fxc f fd completed vocational training n 12 fxc f incorporated national army police n 13 fxc f fd gained ownership land andor property n 14 number microcredit project implemented fxc f andor fd n 15 fxc f fd received microcredit n 16 fxc f fd started incomegenerating activity based microcredit n 17 number literacy programme implemented fxc f andor fd n 18 fxc f fd completed literacy programme n 19 number childcare service created fxc f fd attend training n 20 fxc f fd use childcare service n 21 number communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies conducted fxc f fd n 22 fxc f fd attended communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies n 23 number female staff community eg female translator social worker gender adviser n 24 number support network created fxc f fd n 25 fxc f fd joined support network", "ProcessedSent": " fxc f fd registered vocational training n 10", "SentID": 7137 }, { "ParagraphID": 2183, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \\n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \\n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \\n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \\n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \\n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \\n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \\n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \\n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \\n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \\n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \\n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \\n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \\n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \\n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \\n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128496,14 +128496,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.3. Monitoring of reintegration", - "Sentence": "Average length of time spent in vocational training \\n 11.", + "Sentence": "Average length of time spent in vocational training \n 11.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform community member issue associated fxc f fd n 2 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform female community member eg wife male excombatants benefit n 3 number fxc f fd registered reintegration programme n 4 fxc f fd returned home community n 5 fxc f fd went new place rather home community n 6 number femalespecific transportation service available n 7 fxc f fd used transportation service return community n 8 number vocational training implemented fxc f andor fd n 9 fxc f fd registered vocational training n 10 average length time spent vocational training n 11 fxc f fd completed vocational training n 12 fxc f incorporated national army police n 13 fxc f fd gained ownership land andor property n 14 number microcredit project implemented fxc f andor fd n 15 fxc f fd received microcredit n 16 fxc f fd started incomegenerating activity based microcredit n 17 number literacy programme implemented fxc f andor fd n 18 fxc f fd completed literacy programme n 19 number childcare service created fxc f fd attend training n 20 fxc f fd use childcare service n 21 number communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies conducted fxc f fd n 22 fxc f fd attended communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies n 23 number female staff community eg female translator social worker gender adviser n 24 number support network created fxc f fd n 25 fxc f fd joined support network", "ProcessedSent": "average length time spent vocational training n 11", "SentID": 7138 }, { "ParagraphID": 2183, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \\n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \\n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \\n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \\n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \\n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \\n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \\n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \\n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \\n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \\n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \\n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \\n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \\n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \\n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \\n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128514,14 +128514,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.3. Monitoring of reintegration", - "Sentence": "% of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \\n 12.", + "Sentence": "% of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \n 12.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform community member issue associated fxc f fd n 2 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform female community member eg wife male excombatants benefit n 3 number fxc f fd registered reintegration programme n 4 fxc f fd returned home community n 5 fxc f fd went new place rather home community n 6 number femalespecific transportation service available n 7 fxc f fd used transportation service return community n 8 number vocational training implemented fxc f andor fd n 9 fxc f fd registered vocational training n 10 average length time spent vocational training n 11 fxc f fd completed vocational training n 12 fxc f incorporated national army police n 13 fxc f fd gained ownership land andor property n 14 number microcredit project implemented fxc f andor fd n 15 fxc f fd received microcredit n 16 fxc f fd started incomegenerating activity based microcredit n 17 number literacy programme implemented fxc f andor fd n 18 fxc f fd completed literacy programme n 19 number childcare service created fxc f fd attend training n 20 fxc f fd use childcare service n 21 number communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies conducted fxc f fd n 22 fxc f fd attended communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies n 23 number female staff community eg female translator social worker gender adviser n 24 number support network created fxc f fd n 25 fxc f fd joined support network", "ProcessedSent": " fxc f fd completed vocational training n 12", "SentID": 7139 }, { "ParagraphID": 2183, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \\n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \\n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \\n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \\n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \\n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \\n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \\n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \\n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \\n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \\n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \\n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \\n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \\n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \\n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \\n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128532,14 +128532,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.3. Monitoring of reintegration", - "Sentence": "% of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \\n 13.", + "Sentence": "% of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \n 13.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform community member issue associated fxc f fd n 2 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform female community member eg wife male excombatants benefit n 3 number fxc f fd registered reintegration programme n 4 fxc f fd returned home community n 5 fxc f fd went new place rather home community n 6 number femalespecific transportation service available n 7 fxc f fd used transportation service return community n 8 number vocational training implemented fxc f andor fd n 9 fxc f fd registered vocational training n 10 average length time spent vocational training n 11 fxc f fd completed vocational training n 12 fxc f incorporated national army police n 13 fxc f fd gained ownership land andor property n 14 number microcredit project implemented fxc f andor fd n 15 fxc f fd received microcredit n 16 fxc f fd started incomegenerating activity based microcredit n 17 number literacy programme implemented fxc f andor fd n 18 fxc f fd completed literacy programme n 19 number childcare service created fxc f fd attend training n 20 fxc f fd use childcare service n 21 number communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies conducted fxc f fd n 22 fxc f fd attended communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies n 23 number female staff community eg female translator social worker gender adviser n 24 number support network created fxc f fd n 25 fxc f fd joined support network", "ProcessedSent": " fxc f incorporated national army police n 13", "SentID": 7140 }, { "ParagraphID": 2183, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \\n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \\n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \\n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \\n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \\n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \\n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \\n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \\n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \\n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \\n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \\n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \\n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \\n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \\n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \\n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128550,14 +128550,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.3. Monitoring of reintegration", - "Sentence": "% of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \\n 14.", + "Sentence": "% of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \n 14.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform community member issue associated fxc f fd n 2 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform female community member eg wife male excombatants benefit n 3 number fxc f fd registered reintegration programme n 4 fxc f fd returned home community n 5 fxc f fd went new place rather home community n 6 number femalespecific transportation service available n 7 fxc f fd used transportation service return community n 8 number vocational training implemented fxc f andor fd n 9 fxc f fd registered vocational training n 10 average length time spent vocational training n 11 fxc f fd completed vocational training n 12 fxc f incorporated national army police n 13 fxc f fd gained ownership land andor property n 14 number microcredit project implemented fxc f andor fd n 15 fxc f fd received microcredit n 16 fxc f fd started incomegenerating activity based microcredit n 17 number literacy programme implemented fxc f andor fd n 18 fxc f fd completed literacy programme n 19 number childcare service created fxc f fd attend training n 20 fxc f fd use childcare service n 21 number communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies conducted fxc f fd n 22 fxc f fd attended communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies n 23 number female staff community eg female translator social worker gender adviser n 24 number support network created fxc f fd n 25 fxc f fd joined support network", "ProcessedSent": " fxc f fd gained ownership land andor property n 14", "SentID": 7141 }, { "ParagraphID": 2183, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \\n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \\n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \\n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \\n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \\n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \\n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \\n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \\n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \\n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \\n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \\n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \\n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \\n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \\n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \\n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128568,14 +128568,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.3. Monitoring of reintegration", - "Sentence": "Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 15.", + "Sentence": "Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 15.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform community member issue associated fxc f fd n 2 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform female community member eg wife male excombatants benefit n 3 number fxc f fd registered reintegration programme n 4 fxc f fd returned home community n 5 fxc f fd went new place rather home community n 6 number femalespecific transportation service available n 7 fxc f fd used transportation service return community n 8 number vocational training implemented fxc f andor fd n 9 fxc f fd registered vocational training n 10 average length time spent vocational training n 11 fxc f fd completed vocational training n 12 fxc f incorporated national army police n 13 fxc f fd gained ownership land andor property n 14 number microcredit project implemented fxc f andor fd n 15 fxc f fd received microcredit n 16 fxc f fd started incomegenerating activity based microcredit n 17 number literacy programme implemented fxc f andor fd n 18 fxc f fd completed literacy programme n 19 number childcare service created fxc f fd attend training n 20 fxc f fd use childcare service n 21 number communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies conducted fxc f fd n 22 fxc f fd attended communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies n 23 number female staff community eg female translator social worker gender adviser n 24 number support network created fxc f fd n 25 fxc f fd joined support network", "ProcessedSent": "number microcredit project implemented fxc f andor fd n 15", "SentID": 7142 }, { "ParagraphID": 2183, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \\n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \\n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \\n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \\n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \\n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \\n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \\n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \\n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \\n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \\n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \\n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \\n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \\n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \\n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \\n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128586,14 +128586,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.3. Monitoring of reintegration", - "Sentence": "% of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \\n 16.", + "Sentence": "% of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \n 16.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform community member issue associated fxc f fd n 2 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform female community member eg wife male excombatants benefit n 3 number fxc f fd registered reintegration programme n 4 fxc f fd returned home community n 5 fxc f fd went new place rather home community n 6 number femalespecific transportation service available n 7 fxc f fd used transportation service return community n 8 number vocational training implemented fxc f andor fd n 9 fxc f fd registered vocational training n 10 average length time spent vocational training n 11 fxc f fd completed vocational training n 12 fxc f incorporated national army police n 13 fxc f fd gained ownership land andor property n 14 number microcredit project implemented fxc f andor fd n 15 fxc f fd received microcredit n 16 fxc f fd started incomegenerating activity based microcredit n 17 number literacy programme implemented fxc f andor fd n 18 fxc f fd completed literacy programme n 19 number childcare service created fxc f fd attend training n 20 fxc f fd use childcare service n 21 number communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies conducted fxc f fd n 22 fxc f fd attended communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies n 23 number female staff community eg female translator social worker gender adviser n 24 number support network created fxc f fd n 25 fxc f fd joined support network", "ProcessedSent": " fxc f fd received microcredit n 16", "SentID": 7143 }, { "ParagraphID": 2183, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \\n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \\n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \\n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \\n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \\n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \\n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \\n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \\n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \\n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \\n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \\n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \\n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \\n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \\n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \\n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128604,14 +128604,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.3. Monitoring of reintegration", - "Sentence": "% of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \\n 17.", + "Sentence": "% of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \n 17.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform community member issue associated fxc f fd n 2 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform female community member eg wife male excombatants benefit n 3 number fxc f fd registered reintegration programme n 4 fxc f fd returned home community n 5 fxc f fd went new place rather home community n 6 number femalespecific transportation service available n 7 fxc f fd used transportation service return community n 8 number vocational training implemented fxc f andor fd n 9 fxc f fd registered vocational training n 10 average length time spent vocational training n 11 fxc f fd completed vocational training n 12 fxc f incorporated national army police n 13 fxc f fd gained ownership land andor property n 14 number microcredit project implemented fxc f andor fd n 15 fxc f fd received microcredit n 16 fxc f fd started incomegenerating activity based microcredit n 17 number literacy programme implemented fxc f andor fd n 18 fxc f fd completed literacy programme n 19 number childcare service created fxc f fd attend training n 20 fxc f fd use childcare service n 21 number communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies conducted fxc f fd n 22 fxc f fd attended communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies n 23 number female staff community eg female translator social worker gender adviser n 24 number support network created fxc f fd n 25 fxc f fd joined support network", "ProcessedSent": " fxc f fd started incomegenerating activity based microcredit n 17", "SentID": 7144 }, { "ParagraphID": 2183, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \\n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \\n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \\n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \\n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \\n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \\n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \\n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \\n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \\n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \\n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \\n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \\n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \\n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \\n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \\n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128622,14 +128622,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.3. Monitoring of reintegration", - "Sentence": "Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 18.", + "Sentence": "Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 18.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform community member issue associated fxc f fd n 2 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform female community member eg wife male excombatants benefit n 3 number fxc f fd registered reintegration programme n 4 fxc f fd returned home community n 5 fxc f fd went new place rather home community n 6 number femalespecific transportation service available n 7 fxc f fd used transportation service return community n 8 number vocational training implemented fxc f andor fd n 9 fxc f fd registered vocational training n 10 average length time spent vocational training n 11 fxc f fd completed vocational training n 12 fxc f incorporated national army police n 13 fxc f fd gained ownership land andor property n 14 number microcredit project implemented fxc f andor fd n 15 fxc f fd received microcredit n 16 fxc f fd started incomegenerating activity based microcredit n 17 number literacy programme implemented fxc f andor fd n 18 fxc f fd completed literacy programme n 19 number childcare service created fxc f fd attend training n 20 fxc f fd use childcare service n 21 number communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies conducted fxc f fd n 22 fxc f fd attended communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies n 23 number female staff community eg female translator social worker gender adviser n 24 number support network created fxc f fd n 25 fxc f fd joined support network", "ProcessedSent": "number literacy programme implemented fxc f andor fd n 18", "SentID": 7145 }, { "ParagraphID": 2183, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \\n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \\n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \\n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \\n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \\n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \\n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \\n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \\n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \\n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \\n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \\n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \\n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \\n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \\n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \\n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128640,14 +128640,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.3. Monitoring of reintegration", - "Sentence": "% of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \\n 19.", + "Sentence": "% of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \n 19.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform community member issue associated fxc f fd n 2 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform female community member eg wife male excombatants benefit n 3 number fxc f fd registered reintegration programme n 4 fxc f fd returned home community n 5 fxc f fd went new place rather home community n 6 number femalespecific transportation service available n 7 fxc f fd used transportation service return community n 8 number vocational training implemented fxc f andor fd n 9 fxc f fd registered vocational training n 10 average length time spent vocational training n 11 fxc f fd completed vocational training n 12 fxc f incorporated national army police n 13 fxc f fd gained ownership land andor property n 14 number microcredit project implemented fxc f andor fd n 15 fxc f fd received microcredit n 16 fxc f fd started incomegenerating activity based microcredit n 17 number literacy programme implemented fxc f andor fd n 18 fxc f fd completed literacy programme n 19 number childcare service created fxc f fd attend training n 20 fxc f fd use childcare service n 21 number communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies conducted fxc f fd n 22 fxc f fd attended communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies n 23 number female staff community eg female translator social worker gender adviser n 24 number support network created fxc f fd n 25 fxc f fd joined support network", "ProcessedSent": " fxc f fd completed literacy programme n 19", "SentID": 7146 }, { "ParagraphID": 2183, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \\n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \\n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \\n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \\n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \\n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \\n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \\n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \\n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \\n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \\n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \\n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \\n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \\n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \\n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \\n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128658,14 +128658,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.3. Monitoring of reintegration", - "Sentence": "Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \\n 20.", + "Sentence": "Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \n 20.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform community member issue associated fxc f fd n 2 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform female community member eg wife male excombatants benefit n 3 number fxc f fd registered reintegration programme n 4 fxc f fd returned home community n 5 fxc f fd went new place rather home community n 6 number femalespecific transportation service available n 7 fxc f fd used transportation service return community n 8 number vocational training implemented fxc f andor fd n 9 fxc f fd registered vocational training n 10 average length time spent vocational training n 11 fxc f fd completed vocational training n 12 fxc f incorporated national army police n 13 fxc f fd gained ownership land andor property n 14 number microcredit project implemented fxc f andor fd n 15 fxc f fd received microcredit n 16 fxc f fd started incomegenerating activity based microcredit n 17 number literacy programme implemented fxc f andor fd n 18 fxc f fd completed literacy programme n 19 number childcare service created fxc f fd attend training n 20 fxc f fd use childcare service n 21 number communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies conducted fxc f fd n 22 fxc f fd attended communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies n 23 number female staff community eg female translator social worker gender adviser n 24 number support network created fxc f fd n 25 fxc f fd joined support network", "ProcessedSent": "number childcare service created fxc f fd attend training n 20", "SentID": 7147 }, { "ParagraphID": 2183, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \\n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \\n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \\n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \\n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \\n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \\n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \\n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \\n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \\n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \\n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \\n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \\n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \\n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \\n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \\n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128676,14 +128676,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.3. Monitoring of reintegration", - "Sentence": "% of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \\n 21.", + "Sentence": "% of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \n 21.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform community member issue associated fxc f fd n 2 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform female community member eg wife male excombatants benefit n 3 number fxc f fd registered reintegration programme n 4 fxc f fd returned home community n 5 fxc f fd went new place rather home community n 6 number femalespecific transportation service available n 7 fxc f fd used transportation service return community n 8 number vocational training implemented fxc f andor fd n 9 fxc f fd registered vocational training n 10 average length time spent vocational training n 11 fxc f fd completed vocational training n 12 fxc f incorporated national army police n 13 fxc f fd gained ownership land andor property n 14 number microcredit project implemented fxc f andor fd n 15 fxc f fd received microcredit n 16 fxc f fd started incomegenerating activity based microcredit n 17 number literacy programme implemented fxc f andor fd n 18 fxc f fd completed literacy programme n 19 number childcare service created fxc f fd attend training n 20 fxc f fd use childcare service n 21 number communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies conducted fxc f fd n 22 fxc f fd attended communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies n 23 number female staff community eg female translator social worker gender adviser n 24 number support network created fxc f fd n 25 fxc f fd joined support network", "ProcessedSent": " fxc f fd use childcare service n 21", "SentID": 7148 }, { "ParagraphID": 2183, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \\n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \\n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \\n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \\n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \\n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \\n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \\n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \\n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \\n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \\n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \\n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \\n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \\n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \\n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \\n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128694,14 +128694,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.3. Monitoring of reintegration", - "Sentence": "Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \\n 22.", + "Sentence": "Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \n 22.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform community member issue associated fxc f fd n 2 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform female community member eg wife male excombatants benefit n 3 number fxc f fd registered reintegration programme n 4 fxc f fd returned home community n 5 fxc f fd went new place rather home community n 6 number femalespecific transportation service available n 7 fxc f fd used transportation service return community n 8 number vocational training implemented fxc f andor fd n 9 fxc f fd registered vocational training n 10 average length time spent vocational training n 11 fxc f fd completed vocational training n 12 fxc f incorporated national army police n 13 fxc f fd gained ownership land andor property n 14 number microcredit project implemented fxc f andor fd n 15 fxc f fd received microcredit n 16 fxc f fd started incomegenerating activity based microcredit n 17 number literacy programme implemented fxc f andor fd n 18 fxc f fd completed literacy programme n 19 number childcare service created fxc f fd attend training n 20 fxc f fd use childcare service n 21 number communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies conducted fxc f fd n 22 fxc f fd attended communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies n 23 number female staff community eg female translator social worker gender adviser n 24 number support network created fxc f fd n 25 fxc f fd joined support network", "ProcessedSent": "number communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies conducted fxc f fd n 22", "SentID": 7149 }, { "ParagraphID": 2183, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \\n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \\n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \\n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \\n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \\n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \\n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \\n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \\n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \\n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \\n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \\n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \\n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \\n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \\n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \\n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128712,14 +128712,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.3. Monitoring of reintegration", - "Sentence": "% of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \\n 23.", + "Sentence": "% of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \n 23.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform community member issue associated fxc f fd n 2 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform female community member eg wife male excombatants benefit n 3 number fxc f fd registered reintegration programme n 4 fxc f fd returned home community n 5 fxc f fd went new place rather home community n 6 number femalespecific transportation service available n 7 fxc f fd used transportation service return community n 8 number vocational training implemented fxc f andor fd n 9 fxc f fd registered vocational training n 10 average length time spent vocational training n 11 fxc f fd completed vocational training n 12 fxc f incorporated national army police n 13 fxc f fd gained ownership land andor property n 14 number microcredit project implemented fxc f andor fd n 15 fxc f fd received microcredit n 16 fxc f fd started incomegenerating activity based microcredit n 17 number literacy programme implemented fxc f andor fd n 18 fxc f fd completed literacy programme n 19 number childcare service created fxc f fd attend training n 20 fxc f fd use childcare service n 21 number communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies conducted fxc f fd n 22 fxc f fd attended communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies n 23 number female staff community eg female translator social worker gender adviser n 24 number support network created fxc f fd n 25 fxc f fd joined support network", "ProcessedSent": " fxc f fd attended communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies n 23", "SentID": 7150 }, { "ParagraphID": 2183, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \\n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \\n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \\n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \\n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \\n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \\n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \\n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \\n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \\n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \\n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \\n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \\n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \\n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \\n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \\n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128730,14 +128730,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.3. Monitoring of reintegration", - "Sentence": "Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 24.", + "Sentence": "Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \n 24.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform community member issue associated fxc f fd n 2 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform female community member eg wife male excombatants benefit n 3 number fxc f fd registered reintegration programme n 4 fxc f fd returned home community n 5 fxc f fd went new place rather home community n 6 number femalespecific transportation service available n 7 fxc f fd used transportation service return community n 8 number vocational training implemented fxc f andor fd n 9 fxc f fd registered vocational training n 10 average length time spent vocational training n 11 fxc f fd completed vocational training n 12 fxc f incorporated national army police n 13 fxc f fd gained ownership land andor property n 14 number microcredit project implemented fxc f andor fd n 15 fxc f fd received microcredit n 16 fxc f fd started incomegenerating activity based microcredit n 17 number literacy programme implemented fxc f andor fd n 18 fxc f fd completed literacy programme n 19 number childcare service created fxc f fd attend training n 20 fxc f fd use childcare service n 21 number communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies conducted fxc f fd n 22 fxc f fd attended communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies n 23 number female staff community eg female translator social worker gender adviser n 24 number support network created fxc f fd n 25 fxc f fd joined support network", "ProcessedSent": "number female staff community eg female translator social worker gender adviser n 24", "SentID": 7151 }, { "ParagraphID": 2183, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \\n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \\n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \\n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \\n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \\n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \\n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \\n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \\n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \\n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \\n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \\n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \\n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \\n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \\n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \\n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128748,14 +128748,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.1. Gender-responsive monitoring of programme performance", "Heading4": "4.1.3. Monitoring of reintegration", - "Sentence": "Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \\n 25.", + "Sentence": "Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \n 25.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform community member issue associated fxc f fd n 2 number informationmedia campaign conducted community inform female community member eg wife male excombatants benefit n 3 number fxc f fd registered reintegration programme n 4 fxc f fd returned home community n 5 fxc f fd went new place rather home community n 6 number femalespecific transportation service available n 7 fxc f fd used transportation service return community n 8 number vocational training implemented fxc f andor fd n 9 fxc f fd registered vocational training n 10 average length time spent vocational training n 11 fxc f fd completed vocational training n 12 fxc f incorporated national army police n 13 fxc f fd gained ownership land andor property n 14 number microcredit project implemented fxc f andor fd n 15 fxc f fd received microcredit n 16 fxc f fd started incomegenerating activity based microcredit n 17 number literacy programme implemented fxc f andor fd n 18 fxc f fd completed literacy programme n 19 number childcare service created fxc f fd attend training n 20 fxc f fd use childcare service n 21 number communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies conducted fxc f fd n 22 fxc f fd attended communitybased reintegration ritualsceremonies n 23 number female staff community eg female translator social worker gender adviser n 24 number support network created fxc f fd n 25 fxc f fd joined support network", "ProcessedSent": "number support network created fxc f fd n 25", "SentID": 7152 }, { "ParagraphID": 2183, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \\n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \\n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \\n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \\n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \\n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \\n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \\n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \\n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \\n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \\n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \\n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \\n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \\n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \\n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \\n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \\n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \\n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \\n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \\n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \\n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \\n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform community members of issues associated with FXC, FS and FD \n 2. Number of information\/media campaigns conducted in each community to inform female community members (e.g., wives of male ex-combatants) of benefits \n 3. Number of FXC, FS and FD who registered for reintegration programme \n 4. % of FXC, FS and FD who returned to their home community \n 5. % of FXC, FS and FD who went to new places rather than home community \n 6. Number of female-specific transportation services available \n 7. % of FXC, FS and FD who used those transportation services to return to community \n 8. Number of vocational trainings implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 9. % of FXC, FS and FD who registered for vocational training \n 10. Average length of time spent in vocational training \n 11. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed vocational training \n 12. % of FXC and FS incorporated into the national army or police \n 13. % of FXC, FS and FD who gained the ownership of land and\/or other property \n 14. Number of microcredit projects implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 15. % of FXC, FS and FD who received microcredit \n 16. % of FXC, FS and FD who started income-generating activities based on microcredit \n 17. Number of literacy programmes implemented for FXC, FS and\/or FD \n 18. % of FXC, FS and FD who completed the literacy programmes \n 19. Number of child-care services created for FXC, FS and FD (so that they can attend trainings) \n 20. % of FXC, FS and FD who use the child-care services \n 21. Number of community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies conducted for FXC, FS and FD \n 22. % of FXC, FS and FD who attended community-based reintegration rituals\/ceremonies \n 23. Number of female staff in each community (e.g., female translators, social workers, gender advisers) \n 24. Number of support networks created by FXC, FS and FD \n 25. % of FXC, FS and FD who joined support networks", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128773,7 +128773,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2184, - "Paragraph": "Purpose of evaluation: To examine if and to what extent DDR programmes meet the needs of female ex-combatants, supporters and dependants, and to examine the level of participation of women; \\n Process: (1) Reaching the right target population; (2) meeting the needs of stakeholders; (3) the dynamics of participation of stakeholders; \\n Gendered dimensions of process: (1) Reaching female target population; (2) meeting the needs of women and girls; (3) equal participation of women and women\u2019s organi- zations; \\n Data collection frequency: Every three weeks during the implementation of the pro- gramme.", + "Paragraph": "Purpose of evaluation: To examine if and to what extent DDR programmes meet the needs of female ex-combatants, supporters and dependants, and to examine the level of participation of women; \n Process: (1) Reaching the right target population; (2) meeting the needs of stakeholders; (3) the dynamics of participation of stakeholders; \n Gendered dimensions of process: (1) Reaching female target population; (2) meeting the needs of women and girls; (3) equal participation of women and women\u2019s organi- zations; \n Data collection frequency: Every three weeks during the implementation of the pro- gramme.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128784,14 +128784,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.2. Gender-responsive monitoring of process", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Purpose of evaluation: To examine if and to what extent DDR programmes meet the needs of female ex-combatants, supporters and dependants, and to examine the level of participation of women; \\n Process: (1) Reaching the right target population; (2) meeting the needs of stakeholders; (3) the dynamics of participation of stakeholders; \\n Gendered dimensions of process: (1) Reaching female target population; (2) meeting the needs of women and girls; (3) equal participation of women and women\u2019s organi- zations; \\n Data collection frequency: Every three weeks during the implementation of the pro- gramme.", + "Sentence": "Purpose of evaluation: To examine if and to what extent DDR programmes meet the needs of female ex-combatants, supporters and dependants, and to examine the level of participation of women; \n Process: (1) Reaching the right target population; (2) meeting the needs of stakeholders; (3) the dynamics of participation of stakeholders; \n Gendered dimensions of process: (1) Reaching female target population; (2) meeting the needs of women and girls; (3) equal participation of women and women\u2019s organi- zations; \n Data collection frequency: Every three weeks during the implementation of the pro- gramme.", "newParagraph": "purpose evaluation examine extent ddr programme meet need female excombatants supporter dependant examine level participation woman n process 1 reaching right target population 2 meeting need stakeholder 3 dynamic participation stakeholder n gendered dimension process 1 reaching female target population 2 meeting need woman girl 3 equal participation woman woman organi zations n data collection frequency every three week implementation pro gramme", "ProcessedSent": "purpose evaluation examine extent ddr programme meet need female excombatants supporter dependant examine level participation woman n process 1 reaching right target population 2 meeting need stakeholder 3 dynamic participation stakeholder n gendered dimension process 1 reaching female target population 2 meeting need woman girl 3 equal participation woman woman organi zations n data collection frequency every three week implementation pro gramme", "SentID": 7154 }, { "ParagraphID": 2185, - "Paragraph": "\\n To what extent did the DDR programme meet the needs of female ex-combatants, FAAGFs, and dependants? \\n To what extent did the DDR programme encourage and support the participation of women and women\u2019s organizations at each stage of the programme?", + "Paragraph": "\n To what extent did the DDR programme meet the needs of female ex-combatants, FAAGFs, and dependants? \n To what extent did the DDR programme encourage and support the participation of women and women\u2019s organizations at each stage of the programme?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128802,14 +128802,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.2. Gender-responsive monitoring of process", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n To what extent did the DDR programme meet the needs of female ex-combatants, FAAGFs, and dependants?", + "Sentence": "\n To what extent did the DDR programme meet the needs of female ex-combatants, FAAGFs, and dependants?", "newParagraph": "n extent ddr programme meet need female excombatants faagfs dependant n extent ddr programme encourage support participation woman woman organization stage programme", "ProcessedSent": "n extent ddr programme meet need female excombatants faagfs dependant", "SentID": 7155 }, { "ParagraphID": 2185, - "Paragraph": "\\n To what extent did the DDR programme meet the needs of female ex-combatants, FAAGFs, and dependants? \\n To what extent did the DDR programme encourage and support the participation of women and women\u2019s organizations at each stage of the programme?", + "Paragraph": "\n To what extent did the DDR programme meet the needs of female ex-combatants, FAAGFs, and dependants? \n To what extent did the DDR programme encourage and support the participation of women and women\u2019s organizations at each stage of the programme?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128820,14 +128820,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.2. Gender-responsive monitoring of process", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n To what extent did the DDR programme encourage and support the participation of women and women\u2019s organizations at each stage of the programme?", + "Sentence": "\n To what extent did the DDR programme encourage and support the participation of women and women\u2019s organizations at each stage of the programme?", "newParagraph": "n extent ddr programme meet need female excombatants faagfs dependant n extent ddr programme encourage support participation woman woman organization stage programme", "ProcessedSent": "n extent ddr programme encourage support participation woman woman organization stage programme", "SentID": 7156 }, { "ParagraphID": 2186, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among FXC, FS and FD who received benefits and services from the programmes \\n 2. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among programme staff, including gender advisers \\n 3. Number of and level of complaints that programme staff received from FXC, FS and FD \\n 4. % of female participants at the peace process\/negotiation (should be at least 30 percent \u2014 internationally agreed) \\n 5. % of female participants at the risk\/need assessment \\n 6. Number of FXC, FS and FD who were interviewed during the risk\/need assessment \\n 7. Number of local women and\/or women\u2019s organizations that were interviewed by programme staff to collection information on trading routes and hidden small arms and light weapons \\n 8. Number of women\u2019s organizations that participated in monitoring weapons collection and destruction \\n 9. Number of female leaders and women\u2019s organizations that participated in the planning and\/or implementation of reintegration programme \\n 10. Number of DDR programme meetings that included female leaders and women\u2019s organizations", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among FXC, FS and FD who received benefits and services from the programmes \n 2. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among programme staff, including gender advisers \n 3. Number of and level of complaints that programme staff received from FXC, FS and FD \n 4. % of female participants at the peace process\/negotiation (should be at least 30 percent \u2014 internationally agreed) \n 5. % of female participants at the risk\/need assessment \n 6. Number of FXC, FS and FD who were interviewed during the risk\/need assessment \n 7. Number of local women and\/or women\u2019s organizations that were interviewed by programme staff to collection information on trading routes and hidden small arms and light weapons \n 8. Number of women\u2019s organizations that participated in monitoring weapons collection and destruction \n 9. Number of female leaders and women\u2019s organizations that participated in the planning and\/or implementation of reintegration programme \n 10. Number of DDR programme meetings that included female leaders and women\u2019s organizations", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128838,14 +128838,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.2. Gender-responsive monitoring of process", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1.", + "Sentence": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 level satisfaction ranking among fxc f fd received benefit service programme n 2 level satisfaction ranking among programme staff including gender adviser n 3 number level complaint programme staff received fxc f fd n 4 female participant peace processnegotiation least 30 percent internationally agreed n 5 female participant riskneed assessment n 6 number fxc f fd interviewed riskneed assessment n 7 number local woman andor woman organization interviewed programme staff collection information trading route hidden small arm light weapon n 8 number woman organization participated monitoring weapon collection destruction n 9 number female leader woman organization participated planning andor implementation reintegration programme n 10 number ddr programme meeting included female leader woman organization", "ProcessedSent": "key measurable indicator n 1", "SentID": 7157 }, { "ParagraphID": 2186, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among FXC, FS and FD who received benefits and services from the programmes \\n 2. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among programme staff, including gender advisers \\n 3. Number of and level of complaints that programme staff received from FXC, FS and FD \\n 4. % of female participants at the peace process\/negotiation (should be at least 30 percent \u2014 internationally agreed) \\n 5. % of female participants at the risk\/need assessment \\n 6. Number of FXC, FS and FD who were interviewed during the risk\/need assessment \\n 7. Number of local women and\/or women\u2019s organizations that were interviewed by programme staff to collection information on trading routes and hidden small arms and light weapons \\n 8. Number of women\u2019s organizations that participated in monitoring weapons collection and destruction \\n 9. Number of female leaders and women\u2019s organizations that participated in the planning and\/or implementation of reintegration programme \\n 10. Number of DDR programme meetings that included female leaders and women\u2019s organizations", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among FXC, FS and FD who received benefits and services from the programmes \n 2. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among programme staff, including gender advisers \n 3. Number of and level of complaints that programme staff received from FXC, FS and FD \n 4. % of female participants at the peace process\/negotiation (should be at least 30 percent \u2014 internationally agreed) \n 5. % of female participants at the risk\/need assessment \n 6. Number of FXC, FS and FD who were interviewed during the risk\/need assessment \n 7. Number of local women and\/or women\u2019s organizations that were interviewed by programme staff to collection information on trading routes and hidden small arms and light weapons \n 8. Number of women\u2019s organizations that participated in monitoring weapons collection and destruction \n 9. Number of female leaders and women\u2019s organizations that participated in the planning and\/or implementation of reintegration programme \n 10. Number of DDR programme meetings that included female leaders and women\u2019s organizations", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128856,14 +128856,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.2. Gender-responsive monitoring of process", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Level of satisfaction (ranking) among FXC, FS and FD who received benefits and services from the programmes \\n 2.", + "Sentence": "Level of satisfaction (ranking) among FXC, FS and FD who received benefits and services from the programmes \n 2.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 level satisfaction ranking among fxc f fd received benefit service programme n 2 level satisfaction ranking among programme staff including gender adviser n 3 number level complaint programme staff received fxc f fd n 4 female participant peace processnegotiation least 30 percent internationally agreed n 5 female participant riskneed assessment n 6 number fxc f fd interviewed riskneed assessment n 7 number local woman andor woman organization interviewed programme staff collection information trading route hidden small arm light weapon n 8 number woman organization participated monitoring weapon collection destruction n 9 number female leader woman organization participated planning andor implementation reintegration programme n 10 number ddr programme meeting included female leader woman organization", "ProcessedSent": "level satisfaction ranking among fxc f fd received benefit service programme n 2", "SentID": 7158 }, { "ParagraphID": 2186, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among FXC, FS and FD who received benefits and services from the programmes \\n 2. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among programme staff, including gender advisers \\n 3. Number of and level of complaints that programme staff received from FXC, FS and FD \\n 4. % of female participants at the peace process\/negotiation (should be at least 30 percent \u2014 internationally agreed) \\n 5. % of female participants at the risk\/need assessment \\n 6. Number of FXC, FS and FD who were interviewed during the risk\/need assessment \\n 7. Number of local women and\/or women\u2019s organizations that were interviewed by programme staff to collection information on trading routes and hidden small arms and light weapons \\n 8. Number of women\u2019s organizations that participated in monitoring weapons collection and destruction \\n 9. Number of female leaders and women\u2019s organizations that participated in the planning and\/or implementation of reintegration programme \\n 10. Number of DDR programme meetings that included female leaders and women\u2019s organizations", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among FXC, FS and FD who received benefits and services from the programmes \n 2. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among programme staff, including gender advisers \n 3. Number of and level of complaints that programme staff received from FXC, FS and FD \n 4. % of female participants at the peace process\/negotiation (should be at least 30 percent \u2014 internationally agreed) \n 5. % of female participants at the risk\/need assessment \n 6. Number of FXC, FS and FD who were interviewed during the risk\/need assessment \n 7. Number of local women and\/or women\u2019s organizations that were interviewed by programme staff to collection information on trading routes and hidden small arms and light weapons \n 8. Number of women\u2019s organizations that participated in monitoring weapons collection and destruction \n 9. Number of female leaders and women\u2019s organizations that participated in the planning and\/or implementation of reintegration programme \n 10. Number of DDR programme meetings that included female leaders and women\u2019s organizations", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128874,14 +128874,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.2. Gender-responsive monitoring of process", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Level of satisfaction (ranking) among programme staff, including gender advisers \\n 3.", + "Sentence": "Level of satisfaction (ranking) among programme staff, including gender advisers \n 3.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 level satisfaction ranking among fxc f fd received benefit service programme n 2 level satisfaction ranking among programme staff including gender adviser n 3 number level complaint programme staff received fxc f fd n 4 female participant peace processnegotiation least 30 percent internationally agreed n 5 female participant riskneed assessment n 6 number fxc f fd interviewed riskneed assessment n 7 number local woman andor woman organization interviewed programme staff collection information trading route hidden small arm light weapon n 8 number woman organization participated monitoring weapon collection destruction n 9 number female leader woman organization participated planning andor implementation reintegration programme n 10 number ddr programme meeting included female leader woman organization", "ProcessedSent": "level satisfaction ranking among programme staff including gender adviser n 3", "SentID": 7159 }, { "ParagraphID": 2186, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among FXC, FS and FD who received benefits and services from the programmes \\n 2. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among programme staff, including gender advisers \\n 3. Number of and level of complaints that programme staff received from FXC, FS and FD \\n 4. % of female participants at the peace process\/negotiation (should be at least 30 percent \u2014 internationally agreed) \\n 5. % of female participants at the risk\/need assessment \\n 6. Number of FXC, FS and FD who were interviewed during the risk\/need assessment \\n 7. Number of local women and\/or women\u2019s organizations that were interviewed by programme staff to collection information on trading routes and hidden small arms and light weapons \\n 8. Number of women\u2019s organizations that participated in monitoring weapons collection and destruction \\n 9. Number of female leaders and women\u2019s organizations that participated in the planning and\/or implementation of reintegration programme \\n 10. Number of DDR programme meetings that included female leaders and women\u2019s organizations", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among FXC, FS and FD who received benefits and services from the programmes \n 2. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among programme staff, including gender advisers \n 3. Number of and level of complaints that programme staff received from FXC, FS and FD \n 4. % of female participants at the peace process\/negotiation (should be at least 30 percent \u2014 internationally agreed) \n 5. % of female participants at the risk\/need assessment \n 6. Number of FXC, FS and FD who were interviewed during the risk\/need assessment \n 7. Number of local women and\/or women\u2019s organizations that were interviewed by programme staff to collection information on trading routes and hidden small arms and light weapons \n 8. Number of women\u2019s organizations that participated in monitoring weapons collection and destruction \n 9. Number of female leaders and women\u2019s organizations that participated in the planning and\/or implementation of reintegration programme \n 10. Number of DDR programme meetings that included female leaders and women\u2019s organizations", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128892,14 +128892,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.2. Gender-responsive monitoring of process", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Number of and level of complaints that programme staff received from FXC, FS and FD \\n 4.", + "Sentence": "Number of and level of complaints that programme staff received from FXC, FS and FD \n 4.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 level satisfaction ranking among fxc f fd received benefit service programme n 2 level satisfaction ranking among programme staff including gender adviser n 3 number level complaint programme staff received fxc f fd n 4 female participant peace processnegotiation least 30 percent internationally agreed n 5 female participant riskneed assessment n 6 number fxc f fd interviewed riskneed assessment n 7 number local woman andor woman organization interviewed programme staff collection information trading route hidden small arm light weapon n 8 number woman organization participated monitoring weapon collection destruction n 9 number female leader woman organization participated planning andor implementation reintegration programme n 10 number ddr programme meeting included female leader woman organization", "ProcessedSent": "number level complaint programme staff received fxc f fd n 4", "SentID": 7160 }, { "ParagraphID": 2186, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among FXC, FS and FD who received benefits and services from the programmes \\n 2. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among programme staff, including gender advisers \\n 3. Number of and level of complaints that programme staff received from FXC, FS and FD \\n 4. % of female participants at the peace process\/negotiation (should be at least 30 percent \u2014 internationally agreed) \\n 5. % of female participants at the risk\/need assessment \\n 6. Number of FXC, FS and FD who were interviewed during the risk\/need assessment \\n 7. Number of local women and\/or women\u2019s organizations that were interviewed by programme staff to collection information on trading routes and hidden small arms and light weapons \\n 8. Number of women\u2019s organizations that participated in monitoring weapons collection and destruction \\n 9. Number of female leaders and women\u2019s organizations that participated in the planning and\/or implementation of reintegration programme \\n 10. Number of DDR programme meetings that included female leaders and women\u2019s organizations", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among FXC, FS and FD who received benefits and services from the programmes \n 2. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among programme staff, including gender advisers \n 3. Number of and level of complaints that programme staff received from FXC, FS and FD \n 4. % of female participants at the peace process\/negotiation (should be at least 30 percent \u2014 internationally agreed) \n 5. % of female participants at the risk\/need assessment \n 6. Number of FXC, FS and FD who were interviewed during the risk\/need assessment \n 7. Number of local women and\/or women\u2019s organizations that were interviewed by programme staff to collection information on trading routes and hidden small arms and light weapons \n 8. Number of women\u2019s organizations that participated in monitoring weapons collection and destruction \n 9. Number of female leaders and women\u2019s organizations that participated in the planning and\/or implementation of reintegration programme \n 10. Number of DDR programme meetings that included female leaders and women\u2019s organizations", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128910,14 +128910,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.2. Gender-responsive monitoring of process", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% of female participants at the peace process\/negotiation (should be at least 30 percent \u2014 internationally agreed) \\n 5.", + "Sentence": "% of female participants at the peace process\/negotiation (should be at least 30 percent \u2014 internationally agreed) \n 5.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 level satisfaction ranking among fxc f fd received benefit service programme n 2 level satisfaction ranking among programme staff including gender adviser n 3 number level complaint programme staff received fxc f fd n 4 female participant peace processnegotiation least 30 percent internationally agreed n 5 female participant riskneed assessment n 6 number fxc f fd interviewed riskneed assessment n 7 number local woman andor woman organization interviewed programme staff collection information trading route hidden small arm light weapon n 8 number woman organization participated monitoring weapon collection destruction n 9 number female leader woman organization participated planning andor implementation reintegration programme n 10 number ddr programme meeting included female leader woman organization", "ProcessedSent": " female participant peace processnegotiation least 30 percent internationally agreed n 5", "SentID": 7161 }, { "ParagraphID": 2186, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among FXC, FS and FD who received benefits and services from the programmes \\n 2. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among programme staff, including gender advisers \\n 3. Number of and level of complaints that programme staff received from FXC, FS and FD \\n 4. % of female participants at the peace process\/negotiation (should be at least 30 percent \u2014 internationally agreed) \\n 5. % of female participants at the risk\/need assessment \\n 6. Number of FXC, FS and FD who were interviewed during the risk\/need assessment \\n 7. Number of local women and\/or women\u2019s organizations that were interviewed by programme staff to collection information on trading routes and hidden small arms and light weapons \\n 8. Number of women\u2019s organizations that participated in monitoring weapons collection and destruction \\n 9. Number of female leaders and women\u2019s organizations that participated in the planning and\/or implementation of reintegration programme \\n 10. Number of DDR programme meetings that included female leaders and women\u2019s organizations", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among FXC, FS and FD who received benefits and services from the programmes \n 2. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among programme staff, including gender advisers \n 3. Number of and level of complaints that programme staff received from FXC, FS and FD \n 4. % of female participants at the peace process\/negotiation (should be at least 30 percent \u2014 internationally agreed) \n 5. % of female participants at the risk\/need assessment \n 6. Number of FXC, FS and FD who were interviewed during the risk\/need assessment \n 7. Number of local women and\/or women\u2019s organizations that were interviewed by programme staff to collection information on trading routes and hidden small arms and light weapons \n 8. Number of women\u2019s organizations that participated in monitoring weapons collection and destruction \n 9. Number of female leaders and women\u2019s organizations that participated in the planning and\/or implementation of reintegration programme \n 10. Number of DDR programme meetings that included female leaders and women\u2019s organizations", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128928,14 +128928,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.2. Gender-responsive monitoring of process", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% of female participants at the risk\/need assessment \\n 6.", + "Sentence": "% of female participants at the risk\/need assessment \n 6.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 level satisfaction ranking among fxc f fd received benefit service programme n 2 level satisfaction ranking among programme staff including gender adviser n 3 number level complaint programme staff received fxc f fd n 4 female participant peace processnegotiation least 30 percent internationally agreed n 5 female participant riskneed assessment n 6 number fxc f fd interviewed riskneed assessment n 7 number local woman andor woman organization interviewed programme staff collection information trading route hidden small arm light weapon n 8 number woman organization participated monitoring weapon collection destruction n 9 number female leader woman organization participated planning andor implementation reintegration programme n 10 number ddr programme meeting included female leader woman organization", "ProcessedSent": " female participant riskneed assessment n 6", "SentID": 7162 }, { "ParagraphID": 2186, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among FXC, FS and FD who received benefits and services from the programmes \\n 2. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among programme staff, including gender advisers \\n 3. Number of and level of complaints that programme staff received from FXC, FS and FD \\n 4. % of female participants at the peace process\/negotiation (should be at least 30 percent \u2014 internationally agreed) \\n 5. % of female participants at the risk\/need assessment \\n 6. Number of FXC, FS and FD who were interviewed during the risk\/need assessment \\n 7. Number of local women and\/or women\u2019s organizations that were interviewed by programme staff to collection information on trading routes and hidden small arms and light weapons \\n 8. Number of women\u2019s organizations that participated in monitoring weapons collection and destruction \\n 9. Number of female leaders and women\u2019s organizations that participated in the planning and\/or implementation of reintegration programme \\n 10. Number of DDR programme meetings that included female leaders and women\u2019s organizations", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among FXC, FS and FD who received benefits and services from the programmes \n 2. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among programme staff, including gender advisers \n 3. Number of and level of complaints that programme staff received from FXC, FS and FD \n 4. % of female participants at the peace process\/negotiation (should be at least 30 percent \u2014 internationally agreed) \n 5. % of female participants at the risk\/need assessment \n 6. Number of FXC, FS and FD who were interviewed during the risk\/need assessment \n 7. Number of local women and\/or women\u2019s organizations that were interviewed by programme staff to collection information on trading routes and hidden small arms and light weapons \n 8. Number of women\u2019s organizations that participated in monitoring weapons collection and destruction \n 9. Number of female leaders and women\u2019s organizations that participated in the planning and\/or implementation of reintegration programme \n 10. Number of DDR programme meetings that included female leaders and women\u2019s organizations", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128946,14 +128946,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.2. Gender-responsive monitoring of process", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Number of FXC, FS and FD who were interviewed during the risk\/need assessment \\n 7.", + "Sentence": "Number of FXC, FS and FD who were interviewed during the risk\/need assessment \n 7.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 level satisfaction ranking among fxc f fd received benefit service programme n 2 level satisfaction ranking among programme staff including gender adviser n 3 number level complaint programme staff received fxc f fd n 4 female participant peace processnegotiation least 30 percent internationally agreed n 5 female participant riskneed assessment n 6 number fxc f fd interviewed riskneed assessment n 7 number local woman andor woman organization interviewed programme staff collection information trading route hidden small arm light weapon n 8 number woman organization participated monitoring weapon collection destruction n 9 number female leader woman organization participated planning andor implementation reintegration programme n 10 number ddr programme meeting included female leader woman organization", "ProcessedSent": "number fxc f fd interviewed riskneed assessment n 7", "SentID": 7163 }, { "ParagraphID": 2186, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among FXC, FS and FD who received benefits and services from the programmes \\n 2. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among programme staff, including gender advisers \\n 3. Number of and level of complaints that programme staff received from FXC, FS and FD \\n 4. % of female participants at the peace process\/negotiation (should be at least 30 percent \u2014 internationally agreed) \\n 5. % of female participants at the risk\/need assessment \\n 6. Number of FXC, FS and FD who were interviewed during the risk\/need assessment \\n 7. Number of local women and\/or women\u2019s organizations that were interviewed by programme staff to collection information on trading routes and hidden small arms and light weapons \\n 8. Number of women\u2019s organizations that participated in monitoring weapons collection and destruction \\n 9. Number of female leaders and women\u2019s organizations that participated in the planning and\/or implementation of reintegration programme \\n 10. Number of DDR programme meetings that included female leaders and women\u2019s organizations", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among FXC, FS and FD who received benefits and services from the programmes \n 2. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among programme staff, including gender advisers \n 3. Number of and level of complaints that programme staff received from FXC, FS and FD \n 4. % of female participants at the peace process\/negotiation (should be at least 30 percent \u2014 internationally agreed) \n 5. % of female participants at the risk\/need assessment \n 6. Number of FXC, FS and FD who were interviewed during the risk\/need assessment \n 7. Number of local women and\/or women\u2019s organizations that were interviewed by programme staff to collection information on trading routes and hidden small arms and light weapons \n 8. Number of women\u2019s organizations that participated in monitoring weapons collection and destruction \n 9. Number of female leaders and women\u2019s organizations that participated in the planning and\/or implementation of reintegration programme \n 10. Number of DDR programme meetings that included female leaders and women\u2019s organizations", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128964,14 +128964,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.2. Gender-responsive monitoring of process", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Number of local women and\/or women\u2019s organizations that were interviewed by programme staff to collection information on trading routes and hidden small arms and light weapons \\n 8.", + "Sentence": "Number of local women and\/or women\u2019s organizations that were interviewed by programme staff to collection information on trading routes and hidden small arms and light weapons \n 8.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 level satisfaction ranking among fxc f fd received benefit service programme n 2 level satisfaction ranking among programme staff including gender adviser n 3 number level complaint programme staff received fxc f fd n 4 female participant peace processnegotiation least 30 percent internationally agreed n 5 female participant riskneed assessment n 6 number fxc f fd interviewed riskneed assessment n 7 number local woman andor woman organization interviewed programme staff collection information trading route hidden small arm light weapon n 8 number woman organization participated monitoring weapon collection destruction n 9 number female leader woman organization participated planning andor implementation reintegration programme n 10 number ddr programme meeting included female leader woman organization", "ProcessedSent": "number local woman andor woman organization interviewed programme staff collection information trading route hidden small arm light weapon n 8", "SentID": 7164 }, { "ParagraphID": 2186, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among FXC, FS and FD who received benefits and services from the programmes \\n 2. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among programme staff, including gender advisers \\n 3. Number of and level of complaints that programme staff received from FXC, FS and FD \\n 4. % of female participants at the peace process\/negotiation (should be at least 30 percent \u2014 internationally agreed) \\n 5. % of female participants at the risk\/need assessment \\n 6. Number of FXC, FS and FD who were interviewed during the risk\/need assessment \\n 7. Number of local women and\/or women\u2019s organizations that were interviewed by programme staff to collection information on trading routes and hidden small arms and light weapons \\n 8. Number of women\u2019s organizations that participated in monitoring weapons collection and destruction \\n 9. Number of female leaders and women\u2019s organizations that participated in the planning and\/or implementation of reintegration programme \\n 10. Number of DDR programme meetings that included female leaders and women\u2019s organizations", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among FXC, FS and FD who received benefits and services from the programmes \n 2. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among programme staff, including gender advisers \n 3. Number of and level of complaints that programme staff received from FXC, FS and FD \n 4. % of female participants at the peace process\/negotiation (should be at least 30 percent \u2014 internationally agreed) \n 5. % of female participants at the risk\/need assessment \n 6. Number of FXC, FS and FD who were interviewed during the risk\/need assessment \n 7. Number of local women and\/or women\u2019s organizations that were interviewed by programme staff to collection information on trading routes and hidden small arms and light weapons \n 8. Number of women\u2019s organizations that participated in monitoring weapons collection and destruction \n 9. Number of female leaders and women\u2019s organizations that participated in the planning and\/or implementation of reintegration programme \n 10. Number of DDR programme meetings that included female leaders and women\u2019s organizations", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -128982,14 +128982,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.2. Gender-responsive monitoring of process", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Number of women\u2019s organizations that participated in monitoring weapons collection and destruction \\n 9.", + "Sentence": "Number of women\u2019s organizations that participated in monitoring weapons collection and destruction \n 9.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 level satisfaction ranking among fxc f fd received benefit service programme n 2 level satisfaction ranking among programme staff including gender adviser n 3 number level complaint programme staff received fxc f fd n 4 female participant peace processnegotiation least 30 percent internationally agreed n 5 female participant riskneed assessment n 6 number fxc f fd interviewed riskneed assessment n 7 number local woman andor woman organization interviewed programme staff collection information trading route hidden small arm light weapon n 8 number woman organization participated monitoring weapon collection destruction n 9 number female leader woman organization participated planning andor implementation reintegration programme n 10 number ddr programme meeting included female leader woman organization", "ProcessedSent": "number woman organization participated monitoring weapon collection destruction n 9", "SentID": 7165 }, { "ParagraphID": 2186, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among FXC, FS and FD who received benefits and services from the programmes \\n 2. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among programme staff, including gender advisers \\n 3. Number of and level of complaints that programme staff received from FXC, FS and FD \\n 4. % of female participants at the peace process\/negotiation (should be at least 30 percent \u2014 internationally agreed) \\n 5. % of female participants at the risk\/need assessment \\n 6. Number of FXC, FS and FD who were interviewed during the risk\/need assessment \\n 7. Number of local women and\/or women\u2019s organizations that were interviewed by programme staff to collection information on trading routes and hidden small arms and light weapons \\n 8. Number of women\u2019s organizations that participated in monitoring weapons collection and destruction \\n 9. Number of female leaders and women\u2019s organizations that participated in the planning and\/or implementation of reintegration programme \\n 10. Number of DDR programme meetings that included female leaders and women\u2019s organizations", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among FXC, FS and FD who received benefits and services from the programmes \n 2. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among programme staff, including gender advisers \n 3. Number of and level of complaints that programme staff received from FXC, FS and FD \n 4. % of female participants at the peace process\/negotiation (should be at least 30 percent \u2014 internationally agreed) \n 5. % of female participants at the risk\/need assessment \n 6. Number of FXC, FS and FD who were interviewed during the risk\/need assessment \n 7. Number of local women and\/or women\u2019s organizations that were interviewed by programme staff to collection information on trading routes and hidden small arms and light weapons \n 8. Number of women\u2019s organizations that participated in monitoring weapons collection and destruction \n 9. Number of female leaders and women\u2019s organizations that participated in the planning and\/or implementation of reintegration programme \n 10. Number of DDR programme meetings that included female leaders and women\u2019s organizations", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129000,14 +129000,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.2. Gender-responsive monitoring of process", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Number of female leaders and women\u2019s organizations that participated in the planning and\/or implementation of reintegration programme \\n 10.", + "Sentence": "Number of female leaders and women\u2019s organizations that participated in the planning and\/or implementation of reintegration programme \n 10.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 level satisfaction ranking among fxc f fd received benefit service programme n 2 level satisfaction ranking among programme staff including gender adviser n 3 number level complaint programme staff received fxc f fd n 4 female participant peace processnegotiation least 30 percent internationally agreed n 5 female participant riskneed assessment n 6 number fxc f fd interviewed riskneed assessment n 7 number local woman andor woman organization interviewed programme staff collection information trading route hidden small arm light weapon n 8 number woman organization participated monitoring weapon collection destruction n 9 number female leader woman organization participated planning andor implementation reintegration programme n 10 number ddr programme meeting included female leader woman organization", "ProcessedSent": "number female leader woman organization participated planning andor implementation reintegration programme n 10", "SentID": 7166 }, { "ParagraphID": 2186, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among FXC, FS and FD who received benefits and services from the programmes \\n 2. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among programme staff, including gender advisers \\n 3. Number of and level of complaints that programme staff received from FXC, FS and FD \\n 4. % of female participants at the peace process\/negotiation (should be at least 30 percent \u2014 internationally agreed) \\n 5. % of female participants at the risk\/need assessment \\n 6. Number of FXC, FS and FD who were interviewed during the risk\/need assessment \\n 7. Number of local women and\/or women\u2019s organizations that were interviewed by programme staff to collection information on trading routes and hidden small arms and light weapons \\n 8. Number of women\u2019s organizations that participated in monitoring weapons collection and destruction \\n 9. Number of female leaders and women\u2019s organizations that participated in the planning and\/or implementation of reintegration programme \\n 10. Number of DDR programme meetings that included female leaders and women\u2019s organizations", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among FXC, FS and FD who received benefits and services from the programmes \n 2. Level of satisfaction (ranking) among programme staff, including gender advisers \n 3. Number of and level of complaints that programme staff received from FXC, FS and FD \n 4. % of female participants at the peace process\/negotiation (should be at least 30 percent \u2014 internationally agreed) \n 5. % of female participants at the risk\/need assessment \n 6. Number of FXC, FS and FD who were interviewed during the risk\/need assessment \n 7. Number of local women and\/or women\u2019s organizations that were interviewed by programme staff to collection information on trading routes and hidden small arms and light weapons \n 8. Number of women\u2019s organizations that participated in monitoring weapons collection and destruction \n 9. Number of female leaders and women\u2019s organizations that participated in the planning and\/or implementation of reintegration programme \n 10. Number of DDR programme meetings that included female leaders and women\u2019s organizations", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129025,7 +129025,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2187, - "Paragraph": "Purpose of evaluation: To examine the contribution of DDR programmes to the creation of security for female ex-combatants, FAAGFs and dependants; \\n Outcomes and intermediate results: (1) Capacity-building of ex-combatants and com- munity members; (2) human security; (3) social capital; \\n Gender dimensions of outcomes: (1) Reduction of gender-based violence and dis- crimination against women and girls; (2) human security for women and girls; (3) capacity-building of female ex-combatants, FAAGFs and dependants; \\n Data collection frequency: Every three months upon the completion of programme.", + "Paragraph": "Purpose of evaluation: To examine the contribution of DDR programmes to the creation of security for female ex-combatants, FAAGFs and dependants; \n Outcomes and intermediate results: (1) Capacity-building of ex-combatants and com- munity members; (2) human security; (3) social capital; \n Gender dimensions of outcomes: (1) Reduction of gender-based violence and dis- crimination against women and girls; (2) human security for women and girls; (3) capacity-building of female ex-combatants, FAAGFs and dependants; \n Data collection frequency: Every three months upon the completion of programme.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129036,14 +129036,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.3. Gender-responsive evaluation of outcomes\/results", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Purpose of evaluation: To examine the contribution of DDR programmes to the creation of security for female ex-combatants, FAAGFs and dependants; \\n Outcomes and intermediate results: (1) Capacity-building of ex-combatants and com- munity members; (2) human security; (3) social capital; \\n Gender dimensions of outcomes: (1) Reduction of gender-based violence and dis- crimination against women and girls; (2) human security for women and girls; (3) capacity-building of female ex-combatants, FAAGFs and dependants; \\n Data collection frequency: Every three months upon the completion of programme.", + "Sentence": "Purpose of evaluation: To examine the contribution of DDR programmes to the creation of security for female ex-combatants, FAAGFs and dependants; \n Outcomes and intermediate results: (1) Capacity-building of ex-combatants and com- munity members; (2) human security; (3) social capital; \n Gender dimensions of outcomes: (1) Reduction of gender-based violence and dis- crimination against women and girls; (2) human security for women and girls; (3) capacity-building of female ex-combatants, FAAGFs and dependants; \n Data collection frequency: Every three months upon the completion of programme.", "newParagraph": "purpose evaluation examine contribution ddr programme creation security female excombatants faagfs dependant n outcome intermediate result 1 capacitybuilding excombatants com munity member 2 human security 3 social capital n gender dimension outcome 1 reduction genderbased violence dis crimination woman girl 2 human security woman girl 3 capacitybuilding female excombatants faagfs dependant n data collection frequency every three month upon completion programme", "ProcessedSent": "purpose evaluation examine contribution ddr programme creation security female excombatants faagfs dependant n outcome intermediate result 1 capacitybuilding excombatants com munity member 2 human security 3 social capital n gender dimension outcome 1 reduction genderbased violence dis crimination woman girl 2 human security woman girl 3 capacitybuilding female excombatants faagfs dependant n data collection frequency every three month upon completion programme", "SentID": 7168 }, { "ParagraphID": 2188, - "Paragraph": "Key question to ask: \\n To what extent did the DDR programme increase human security (physical, psycho- logical, economic, social, political, cultural) for female ex-combatants, FAAFGs and dependants?", + "Paragraph": "Key question to ask: \n To what extent did the DDR programme increase human security (physical, psycho- logical, economic, social, political, cultural) for female ex-combatants, FAAFGs and dependants?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129054,14 +129054,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.3. Gender-responsive evaluation of outcomes\/results", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Key question to ask: \\n To what extent did the DDR programme increase human security (physical, psycho- logical, economic, social, political, cultural) for female ex-combatants, FAAFGs and dependants?", + "Sentence": "Key question to ask: \n To what extent did the DDR programme increase human security (physical, psycho- logical, economic, social, political, cultural) for female ex-combatants, FAAFGs and dependants?", "newParagraph": "key question ask n extent ddr programme increase human security physical psycho logical economic social political cultural female excombatants faafgs dependant", "ProcessedSent": "key question ask n extent ddr programme increase human security physical psycho logical economic social political cultural female excombatants faafgs dependant", "SentID": 7169 }, { "ParagraphID": 2189, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \\n 1. % change in the number of female deaths, injuries, abductions, rapes and domestic violence cases reported among FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who initiated and are maintaining income-generating activities \\n 3. % change in the number of FXC and FS who joined the police services \\n 4. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in peace-building activities \\n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have access to health services (including counselling, contraceptives, family planning) \\n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in political activities \\n 7. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in cultural activities \\n 8. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in public\/community meetings \\n 9. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have a higher level of self-confidence \\n 10. % change in the HIV and other sexually transmitted disease infection rate among FXC, FS and FD \\n 11. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel safe to live in their community \\n 12. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel threatened by something or someone \\n 13. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel a sense of belonging to their community", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \n 1. % change in the number of female deaths, injuries, abductions, rapes and domestic violence cases reported among FXC, FS and FD \n 2. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who initiated and are maintaining income-generating activities \n 3. % change in the number of FXC and FS who joined the police services \n 4. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in peace-building activities \n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have access to health services (including counselling, contraceptives, family planning) \n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in political activities \n 7. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in cultural activities \n 8. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in public\/community meetings \n 9. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have a higher level of self-confidence \n 10. % change in the HIV and other sexually transmitted disease infection rate among FXC, FS and FD \n 11. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel safe to live in their community \n 12. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel threatened by something or someone \n 13. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel a sense of belonging to their community", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129072,14 +129072,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.3. Gender-responsive evaluation of outcomes\/results", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \\n 1.", + "Sentence": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \n 1.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator compared baseline data n 1 change number female death injury abduction rape domestic violence case reported among fxc f fd n 2 change number fxc f fd initiated maintaining incomegenerating activity n 3 change number fxc f joined police service n 4 change number fxc f fd participating peacebuilding activity n 5 change number fxc f fd access health service including counselling contraceptive family planning n 6 change number fxc f fd participating political activity n 7 change number fxc f fd participating cultural activity n 8 change number fxc f fd participating publiccommunity meeting n 9 change number fxc f fd higher level selfconfidence n 10 change hiv sexually transmitted disease infection rate among fxc f fd n 11 change number fxc f fd feel safe live community n 12 change number fxc f fd feel threatened something someone n 13 change number fxc f fd feel sense belonging community", "ProcessedSent": "key measurable indicator compared baseline data n 1", "SentID": 7170 }, { "ParagraphID": 2189, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \\n 1. % change in the number of female deaths, injuries, abductions, rapes and domestic violence cases reported among FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who initiated and are maintaining income-generating activities \\n 3. % change in the number of FXC and FS who joined the police services \\n 4. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in peace-building activities \\n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have access to health services (including counselling, contraceptives, family planning) \\n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in political activities \\n 7. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in cultural activities \\n 8. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in public\/community meetings \\n 9. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have a higher level of self-confidence \\n 10. % change in the HIV and other sexually transmitted disease infection rate among FXC, FS and FD \\n 11. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel safe to live in their community \\n 12. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel threatened by something or someone \\n 13. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel a sense of belonging to their community", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \n 1. % change in the number of female deaths, injuries, abductions, rapes and domestic violence cases reported among FXC, FS and FD \n 2. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who initiated and are maintaining income-generating activities \n 3. % change in the number of FXC and FS who joined the police services \n 4. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in peace-building activities \n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have access to health services (including counselling, contraceptives, family planning) \n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in political activities \n 7. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in cultural activities \n 8. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in public\/community meetings \n 9. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have a higher level of self-confidence \n 10. % change in the HIV and other sexually transmitted disease infection rate among FXC, FS and FD \n 11. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel safe to live in their community \n 12. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel threatened by something or someone \n 13. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel a sense of belonging to their community", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129090,14 +129090,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.3. Gender-responsive evaluation of outcomes\/results", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% change in the number of female deaths, injuries, abductions, rapes and domestic violence cases reported among FXC, FS and FD \\n 2.", + "Sentence": "% change in the number of female deaths, injuries, abductions, rapes and domestic violence cases reported among FXC, FS and FD \n 2.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator compared baseline data n 1 change number female death injury abduction rape domestic violence case reported among fxc f fd n 2 change number fxc f fd initiated maintaining incomegenerating activity n 3 change number fxc f joined police service n 4 change number fxc f fd participating peacebuilding activity n 5 change number fxc f fd access health service including counselling contraceptive family planning n 6 change number fxc f fd participating political activity n 7 change number fxc f fd participating cultural activity n 8 change number fxc f fd participating publiccommunity meeting n 9 change number fxc f fd higher level selfconfidence n 10 change hiv sexually transmitted disease infection rate among fxc f fd n 11 change number fxc f fd feel safe live community n 12 change number fxc f fd feel threatened something someone n 13 change number fxc f fd feel sense belonging community", "ProcessedSent": " change number female death injury abduction rape domestic violence case reported among fxc f fd n 2", "SentID": 7171 }, { "ParagraphID": 2189, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \\n 1. % change in the number of female deaths, injuries, abductions, rapes and domestic violence cases reported among FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who initiated and are maintaining income-generating activities \\n 3. % change in the number of FXC and FS who joined the police services \\n 4. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in peace-building activities \\n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have access to health services (including counselling, contraceptives, family planning) \\n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in political activities \\n 7. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in cultural activities \\n 8. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in public\/community meetings \\n 9. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have a higher level of self-confidence \\n 10. % change in the HIV and other sexually transmitted disease infection rate among FXC, FS and FD \\n 11. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel safe to live in their community \\n 12. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel threatened by something or someone \\n 13. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel a sense of belonging to their community", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \n 1. % change in the number of female deaths, injuries, abductions, rapes and domestic violence cases reported among FXC, FS and FD \n 2. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who initiated and are maintaining income-generating activities \n 3. % change in the number of FXC and FS who joined the police services \n 4. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in peace-building activities \n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have access to health services (including counselling, contraceptives, family planning) \n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in political activities \n 7. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in cultural activities \n 8. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in public\/community meetings \n 9. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have a higher level of self-confidence \n 10. % change in the HIV and other sexually transmitted disease infection rate among FXC, FS and FD \n 11. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel safe to live in their community \n 12. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel threatened by something or someone \n 13. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel a sense of belonging to their community", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129108,14 +129108,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.3. Gender-responsive evaluation of outcomes\/results", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who initiated and are maintaining income-generating activities \\n 3.", + "Sentence": "% change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who initiated and are maintaining income-generating activities \n 3.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator compared baseline data n 1 change number female death injury abduction rape domestic violence case reported among fxc f fd n 2 change number fxc f fd initiated maintaining incomegenerating activity n 3 change number fxc f joined police service n 4 change number fxc f fd participating peacebuilding activity n 5 change number fxc f fd access health service including counselling contraceptive family planning n 6 change number fxc f fd participating political activity n 7 change number fxc f fd participating cultural activity n 8 change number fxc f fd participating publiccommunity meeting n 9 change number fxc f fd higher level selfconfidence n 10 change hiv sexually transmitted disease infection rate among fxc f fd n 11 change number fxc f fd feel safe live community n 12 change number fxc f fd feel threatened something someone n 13 change number fxc f fd feel sense belonging community", "ProcessedSent": " change number fxc f fd initiated maintaining incomegenerating activity n 3", "SentID": 7172 }, { "ParagraphID": 2189, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \\n 1. % change in the number of female deaths, injuries, abductions, rapes and domestic violence cases reported among FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who initiated and are maintaining income-generating activities \\n 3. % change in the number of FXC and FS who joined the police services \\n 4. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in peace-building activities \\n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have access to health services (including counselling, contraceptives, family planning) \\n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in political activities \\n 7. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in cultural activities \\n 8. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in public\/community meetings \\n 9. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have a higher level of self-confidence \\n 10. % change in the HIV and other sexually transmitted disease infection rate among FXC, FS and FD \\n 11. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel safe to live in their community \\n 12. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel threatened by something or someone \\n 13. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel a sense of belonging to their community", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \n 1. % change in the number of female deaths, injuries, abductions, rapes and domestic violence cases reported among FXC, FS and FD \n 2. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who initiated and are maintaining income-generating activities \n 3. % change in the number of FXC and FS who joined the police services \n 4. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in peace-building activities \n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have access to health services (including counselling, contraceptives, family planning) \n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in political activities \n 7. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in cultural activities \n 8. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in public\/community meetings \n 9. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have a higher level of self-confidence \n 10. % change in the HIV and other sexually transmitted disease infection rate among FXC, FS and FD \n 11. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel safe to live in their community \n 12. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel threatened by something or someone \n 13. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel a sense of belonging to their community", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129126,14 +129126,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.3. Gender-responsive evaluation of outcomes\/results", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% change in the number of FXC and FS who joined the police services \\n 4.", + "Sentence": "% change in the number of FXC and FS who joined the police services \n 4.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator compared baseline data n 1 change number female death injury abduction rape domestic violence case reported among fxc f fd n 2 change number fxc f fd initiated maintaining incomegenerating activity n 3 change number fxc f joined police service n 4 change number fxc f fd participating peacebuilding activity n 5 change number fxc f fd access health service including counselling contraceptive family planning n 6 change number fxc f fd participating political activity n 7 change number fxc f fd participating cultural activity n 8 change number fxc f fd participating publiccommunity meeting n 9 change number fxc f fd higher level selfconfidence n 10 change hiv sexually transmitted disease infection rate among fxc f fd n 11 change number fxc f fd feel safe live community n 12 change number fxc f fd feel threatened something someone n 13 change number fxc f fd feel sense belonging community", "ProcessedSent": " change number fxc f joined police service n 4", "SentID": 7173 }, { "ParagraphID": 2189, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \\n 1. % change in the number of female deaths, injuries, abductions, rapes and domestic violence cases reported among FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who initiated and are maintaining income-generating activities \\n 3. % change in the number of FXC and FS who joined the police services \\n 4. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in peace-building activities \\n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have access to health services (including counselling, contraceptives, family planning) \\n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in political activities \\n 7. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in cultural activities \\n 8. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in public\/community meetings \\n 9. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have a higher level of self-confidence \\n 10. % change in the HIV and other sexually transmitted disease infection rate among FXC, FS and FD \\n 11. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel safe to live in their community \\n 12. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel threatened by something or someone \\n 13. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel a sense of belonging to their community", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \n 1. % change in the number of female deaths, injuries, abductions, rapes and domestic violence cases reported among FXC, FS and FD \n 2. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who initiated and are maintaining income-generating activities \n 3. % change in the number of FXC and FS who joined the police services \n 4. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in peace-building activities \n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have access to health services (including counselling, contraceptives, family planning) \n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in political activities \n 7. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in cultural activities \n 8. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in public\/community meetings \n 9. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have a higher level of self-confidence \n 10. % change in the HIV and other sexually transmitted disease infection rate among FXC, FS and FD \n 11. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel safe to live in their community \n 12. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel threatened by something or someone \n 13. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel a sense of belonging to their community", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129144,14 +129144,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.3. Gender-responsive evaluation of outcomes\/results", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in peace-building activities \\n 5.", + "Sentence": "% change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in peace-building activities \n 5.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator compared baseline data n 1 change number female death injury abduction rape domestic violence case reported among fxc f fd n 2 change number fxc f fd initiated maintaining incomegenerating activity n 3 change number fxc f joined police service n 4 change number fxc f fd participating peacebuilding activity n 5 change number fxc f fd access health service including counselling contraceptive family planning n 6 change number fxc f fd participating political activity n 7 change number fxc f fd participating cultural activity n 8 change number fxc f fd participating publiccommunity meeting n 9 change number fxc f fd higher level selfconfidence n 10 change hiv sexually transmitted disease infection rate among fxc f fd n 11 change number fxc f fd feel safe live community n 12 change number fxc f fd feel threatened something someone n 13 change number fxc f fd feel sense belonging community", "ProcessedSent": " change number fxc f fd participating peacebuilding activity n 5", "SentID": 7174 }, { "ParagraphID": 2189, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \\n 1. % change in the number of female deaths, injuries, abductions, rapes and domestic violence cases reported among FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who initiated and are maintaining income-generating activities \\n 3. % change in the number of FXC and FS who joined the police services \\n 4. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in peace-building activities \\n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have access to health services (including counselling, contraceptives, family planning) \\n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in political activities \\n 7. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in cultural activities \\n 8. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in public\/community meetings \\n 9. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have a higher level of self-confidence \\n 10. % change in the HIV and other sexually transmitted disease infection rate among FXC, FS and FD \\n 11. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel safe to live in their community \\n 12. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel threatened by something or someone \\n 13. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel a sense of belonging to their community", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \n 1. % change in the number of female deaths, injuries, abductions, rapes and domestic violence cases reported among FXC, FS and FD \n 2. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who initiated and are maintaining income-generating activities \n 3. % change in the number of FXC and FS who joined the police services \n 4. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in peace-building activities \n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have access to health services (including counselling, contraceptives, family planning) \n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in political activities \n 7. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in cultural activities \n 8. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in public\/community meetings \n 9. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have a higher level of self-confidence \n 10. % change in the HIV and other sexually transmitted disease infection rate among FXC, FS and FD \n 11. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel safe to live in their community \n 12. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel threatened by something or someone \n 13. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel a sense of belonging to their community", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129162,14 +129162,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.3. Gender-responsive evaluation of outcomes\/results", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have access to health services (including counselling, contraceptives, family planning) \\n 6.", + "Sentence": "% change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have access to health services (including counselling, contraceptives, family planning) \n 6.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator compared baseline data n 1 change number female death injury abduction rape domestic violence case reported among fxc f fd n 2 change number fxc f fd initiated maintaining incomegenerating activity n 3 change number fxc f joined police service n 4 change number fxc f fd participating peacebuilding activity n 5 change number fxc f fd access health service including counselling contraceptive family planning n 6 change number fxc f fd participating political activity n 7 change number fxc f fd participating cultural activity n 8 change number fxc f fd participating publiccommunity meeting n 9 change number fxc f fd higher level selfconfidence n 10 change hiv sexually transmitted disease infection rate among fxc f fd n 11 change number fxc f fd feel safe live community n 12 change number fxc f fd feel threatened something someone n 13 change number fxc f fd feel sense belonging community", "ProcessedSent": " change number fxc f fd access health service including counselling contraceptive family planning n 6", "SentID": 7175 }, { "ParagraphID": 2189, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \\n 1. % change in the number of female deaths, injuries, abductions, rapes and domestic violence cases reported among FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who initiated and are maintaining income-generating activities \\n 3. % change in the number of FXC and FS who joined the police services \\n 4. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in peace-building activities \\n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have access to health services (including counselling, contraceptives, family planning) \\n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in political activities \\n 7. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in cultural activities \\n 8. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in public\/community meetings \\n 9. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have a higher level of self-confidence \\n 10. % change in the HIV and other sexually transmitted disease infection rate among FXC, FS and FD \\n 11. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel safe to live in their community \\n 12. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel threatened by something or someone \\n 13. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel a sense of belonging to their community", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \n 1. % change in the number of female deaths, injuries, abductions, rapes and domestic violence cases reported among FXC, FS and FD \n 2. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who initiated and are maintaining income-generating activities \n 3. % change in the number of FXC and FS who joined the police services \n 4. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in peace-building activities \n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have access to health services (including counselling, contraceptives, family planning) \n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in political activities \n 7. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in cultural activities \n 8. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in public\/community meetings \n 9. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have a higher level of self-confidence \n 10. % change in the HIV and other sexually transmitted disease infection rate among FXC, FS and FD \n 11. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel safe to live in their community \n 12. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel threatened by something or someone \n 13. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel a sense of belonging to their community", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129180,14 +129180,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.3. Gender-responsive evaluation of outcomes\/results", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in political activities \\n 7.", + "Sentence": "% change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in political activities \n 7.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator compared baseline data n 1 change number female death injury abduction rape domestic violence case reported among fxc f fd n 2 change number fxc f fd initiated maintaining incomegenerating activity n 3 change number fxc f joined police service n 4 change number fxc f fd participating peacebuilding activity n 5 change number fxc f fd access health service including counselling contraceptive family planning n 6 change number fxc f fd participating political activity n 7 change number fxc f fd participating cultural activity n 8 change number fxc f fd participating publiccommunity meeting n 9 change number fxc f fd higher level selfconfidence n 10 change hiv sexually transmitted disease infection rate among fxc f fd n 11 change number fxc f fd feel safe live community n 12 change number fxc f fd feel threatened something someone n 13 change number fxc f fd feel sense belonging community", "ProcessedSent": " change number fxc f fd participating political activity n 7", "SentID": 7176 }, { "ParagraphID": 2189, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \\n 1. % change in the number of female deaths, injuries, abductions, rapes and domestic violence cases reported among FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who initiated and are maintaining income-generating activities \\n 3. % change in the number of FXC and FS who joined the police services \\n 4. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in peace-building activities \\n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have access to health services (including counselling, contraceptives, family planning) \\n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in political activities \\n 7. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in cultural activities \\n 8. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in public\/community meetings \\n 9. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have a higher level of self-confidence \\n 10. % change in the HIV and other sexually transmitted disease infection rate among FXC, FS and FD \\n 11. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel safe to live in their community \\n 12. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel threatened by something or someone \\n 13. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel a sense of belonging to their community", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \n 1. % change in the number of female deaths, injuries, abductions, rapes and domestic violence cases reported among FXC, FS and FD \n 2. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who initiated and are maintaining income-generating activities \n 3. % change in the number of FXC and FS who joined the police services \n 4. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in peace-building activities \n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have access to health services (including counselling, contraceptives, family planning) \n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in political activities \n 7. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in cultural activities \n 8. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in public\/community meetings \n 9. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have a higher level of self-confidence \n 10. % change in the HIV and other sexually transmitted disease infection rate among FXC, FS and FD \n 11. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel safe to live in their community \n 12. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel threatened by something or someone \n 13. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel a sense of belonging to their community", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129198,14 +129198,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.3. Gender-responsive evaluation of outcomes\/results", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in cultural activities \\n 8.", + "Sentence": "% change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in cultural activities \n 8.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator compared baseline data n 1 change number female death injury abduction rape domestic violence case reported among fxc f fd n 2 change number fxc f fd initiated maintaining incomegenerating activity n 3 change number fxc f joined police service n 4 change number fxc f fd participating peacebuilding activity n 5 change number fxc f fd access health service including counselling contraceptive family planning n 6 change number fxc f fd participating political activity n 7 change number fxc f fd participating cultural activity n 8 change number fxc f fd participating publiccommunity meeting n 9 change number fxc f fd higher level selfconfidence n 10 change hiv sexually transmitted disease infection rate among fxc f fd n 11 change number fxc f fd feel safe live community n 12 change number fxc f fd feel threatened something someone n 13 change number fxc f fd feel sense belonging community", "ProcessedSent": " change number fxc f fd participating cultural activity n 8", "SentID": 7177 }, { "ParagraphID": 2189, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \\n 1. % change in the number of female deaths, injuries, abductions, rapes and domestic violence cases reported among FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who initiated and are maintaining income-generating activities \\n 3. % change in the number of FXC and FS who joined the police services \\n 4. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in peace-building activities \\n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have access to health services (including counselling, contraceptives, family planning) \\n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in political activities \\n 7. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in cultural activities \\n 8. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in public\/community meetings \\n 9. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have a higher level of self-confidence \\n 10. % change in the HIV and other sexually transmitted disease infection rate among FXC, FS and FD \\n 11. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel safe to live in their community \\n 12. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel threatened by something or someone \\n 13. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel a sense of belonging to their community", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \n 1. % change in the number of female deaths, injuries, abductions, rapes and domestic violence cases reported among FXC, FS and FD \n 2. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who initiated and are maintaining income-generating activities \n 3. % change in the number of FXC and FS who joined the police services \n 4. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in peace-building activities \n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have access to health services (including counselling, contraceptives, family planning) \n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in political activities \n 7. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in cultural activities \n 8. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in public\/community meetings \n 9. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have a higher level of self-confidence \n 10. % change in the HIV and other sexually transmitted disease infection rate among FXC, FS and FD \n 11. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel safe to live in their community \n 12. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel threatened by something or someone \n 13. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel a sense of belonging to their community", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129216,14 +129216,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.3. Gender-responsive evaluation of outcomes\/results", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in public\/community meetings \\n 9.", + "Sentence": "% change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in public\/community meetings \n 9.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator compared baseline data n 1 change number female death injury abduction rape domestic violence case reported among fxc f fd n 2 change number fxc f fd initiated maintaining incomegenerating activity n 3 change number fxc f joined police service n 4 change number fxc f fd participating peacebuilding activity n 5 change number fxc f fd access health service including counselling contraceptive family planning n 6 change number fxc f fd participating political activity n 7 change number fxc f fd participating cultural activity n 8 change number fxc f fd participating publiccommunity meeting n 9 change number fxc f fd higher level selfconfidence n 10 change hiv sexually transmitted disease infection rate among fxc f fd n 11 change number fxc f fd feel safe live community n 12 change number fxc f fd feel threatened something someone n 13 change number fxc f fd feel sense belonging community", "ProcessedSent": " change number fxc f fd participating publiccommunity meeting n 9", "SentID": 7178 }, { "ParagraphID": 2189, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \\n 1. % change in the number of female deaths, injuries, abductions, rapes and domestic violence cases reported among FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who initiated and are maintaining income-generating activities \\n 3. % change in the number of FXC and FS who joined the police services \\n 4. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in peace-building activities \\n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have access to health services (including counselling, contraceptives, family planning) \\n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in political activities \\n 7. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in cultural activities \\n 8. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in public\/community meetings \\n 9. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have a higher level of self-confidence \\n 10. % change in the HIV and other sexually transmitted disease infection rate among FXC, FS and FD \\n 11. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel safe to live in their community \\n 12. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel threatened by something or someone \\n 13. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel a sense of belonging to their community", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \n 1. % change in the number of female deaths, injuries, abductions, rapes and domestic violence cases reported among FXC, FS and FD \n 2. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who initiated and are maintaining income-generating activities \n 3. % change in the number of FXC and FS who joined the police services \n 4. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in peace-building activities \n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have access to health services (including counselling, contraceptives, family planning) \n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in political activities \n 7. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in cultural activities \n 8. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in public\/community meetings \n 9. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have a higher level of self-confidence \n 10. % change in the HIV and other sexually transmitted disease infection rate among FXC, FS and FD \n 11. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel safe to live in their community \n 12. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel threatened by something or someone \n 13. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel a sense of belonging to their community", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129234,14 +129234,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.3. Gender-responsive evaluation of outcomes\/results", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have a higher level of self-confidence \\n 10.", + "Sentence": "% change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have a higher level of self-confidence \n 10.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator compared baseline data n 1 change number female death injury abduction rape domestic violence case reported among fxc f fd n 2 change number fxc f fd initiated maintaining incomegenerating activity n 3 change number fxc f joined police service n 4 change number fxc f fd participating peacebuilding activity n 5 change number fxc f fd access health service including counselling contraceptive family planning n 6 change number fxc f fd participating political activity n 7 change number fxc f fd participating cultural activity n 8 change number fxc f fd participating publiccommunity meeting n 9 change number fxc f fd higher level selfconfidence n 10 change hiv sexually transmitted disease infection rate among fxc f fd n 11 change number fxc f fd feel safe live community n 12 change number fxc f fd feel threatened something someone n 13 change number fxc f fd feel sense belonging community", "ProcessedSent": " change number fxc f fd higher level selfconfidence n 10", "SentID": 7179 }, { "ParagraphID": 2189, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \\n 1. % change in the number of female deaths, injuries, abductions, rapes and domestic violence cases reported among FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who initiated and are maintaining income-generating activities \\n 3. % change in the number of FXC and FS who joined the police services \\n 4. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in peace-building activities \\n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have access to health services (including counselling, contraceptives, family planning) \\n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in political activities \\n 7. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in cultural activities \\n 8. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in public\/community meetings \\n 9. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have a higher level of self-confidence \\n 10. % change in the HIV and other sexually transmitted disease infection rate among FXC, FS and FD \\n 11. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel safe to live in their community \\n 12. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel threatened by something or someone \\n 13. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel a sense of belonging to their community", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \n 1. % change in the number of female deaths, injuries, abductions, rapes and domestic violence cases reported among FXC, FS and FD \n 2. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who initiated and are maintaining income-generating activities \n 3. % change in the number of FXC and FS who joined the police services \n 4. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in peace-building activities \n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have access to health services (including counselling, contraceptives, family planning) \n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in political activities \n 7. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in cultural activities \n 8. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in public\/community meetings \n 9. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have a higher level of self-confidence \n 10. % change in the HIV and other sexually transmitted disease infection rate among FXC, FS and FD \n 11. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel safe to live in their community \n 12. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel threatened by something or someone \n 13. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel a sense of belonging to their community", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129252,14 +129252,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.3. Gender-responsive evaluation of outcomes\/results", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% change in the HIV and other sexually transmitted disease infection rate among FXC, FS and FD \\n 11.", + "Sentence": "% change in the HIV and other sexually transmitted disease infection rate among FXC, FS and FD \n 11.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator compared baseline data n 1 change number female death injury abduction rape domestic violence case reported among fxc f fd n 2 change number fxc f fd initiated maintaining incomegenerating activity n 3 change number fxc f joined police service n 4 change number fxc f fd participating peacebuilding activity n 5 change number fxc f fd access health service including counselling contraceptive family planning n 6 change number fxc f fd participating political activity n 7 change number fxc f fd participating cultural activity n 8 change number fxc f fd participating publiccommunity meeting n 9 change number fxc f fd higher level selfconfidence n 10 change hiv sexually transmitted disease infection rate among fxc f fd n 11 change number fxc f fd feel safe live community n 12 change number fxc f fd feel threatened something someone n 13 change number fxc f fd feel sense belonging community", "ProcessedSent": " change hiv sexually transmitted disease infection rate among fxc f fd n 11", "SentID": 7180 }, { "ParagraphID": 2189, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \\n 1. % change in the number of female deaths, injuries, abductions, rapes and domestic violence cases reported among FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who initiated and are maintaining income-generating activities \\n 3. % change in the number of FXC and FS who joined the police services \\n 4. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in peace-building activities \\n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have access to health services (including counselling, contraceptives, family planning) \\n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in political activities \\n 7. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in cultural activities \\n 8. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in public\/community meetings \\n 9. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have a higher level of self-confidence \\n 10. % change in the HIV and other sexually transmitted disease infection rate among FXC, FS and FD \\n 11. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel safe to live in their community \\n 12. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel threatened by something or someone \\n 13. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel a sense of belonging to their community", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \n 1. % change in the number of female deaths, injuries, abductions, rapes and domestic violence cases reported among FXC, FS and FD \n 2. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who initiated and are maintaining income-generating activities \n 3. % change in the number of FXC and FS who joined the police services \n 4. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in peace-building activities \n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have access to health services (including counselling, contraceptives, family planning) \n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in political activities \n 7. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in cultural activities \n 8. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in public\/community meetings \n 9. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have a higher level of self-confidence \n 10. % change in the HIV and other sexually transmitted disease infection rate among FXC, FS and FD \n 11. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel safe to live in their community \n 12. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel threatened by something or someone \n 13. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel a sense of belonging to their community", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129270,14 +129270,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.3. Gender-responsive evaluation of outcomes\/results", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel safe to live in their community \\n 12.", + "Sentence": "% change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel safe to live in their community \n 12.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator compared baseline data n 1 change number female death injury abduction rape domestic violence case reported among fxc f fd n 2 change number fxc f fd initiated maintaining incomegenerating activity n 3 change number fxc f joined police service n 4 change number fxc f fd participating peacebuilding activity n 5 change number fxc f fd access health service including counselling contraceptive family planning n 6 change number fxc f fd participating political activity n 7 change number fxc f fd participating cultural activity n 8 change number fxc f fd participating publiccommunity meeting n 9 change number fxc f fd higher level selfconfidence n 10 change hiv sexually transmitted disease infection rate among fxc f fd n 11 change number fxc f fd feel safe live community n 12 change number fxc f fd feel threatened something someone n 13 change number fxc f fd feel sense belonging community", "ProcessedSent": " change number fxc f fd feel safe live community n 12", "SentID": 7181 }, { "ParagraphID": 2189, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \\n 1. % change in the number of female deaths, injuries, abductions, rapes and domestic violence cases reported among FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who initiated and are maintaining income-generating activities \\n 3. % change in the number of FXC and FS who joined the police services \\n 4. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in peace-building activities \\n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have access to health services (including counselling, contraceptives, family planning) \\n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in political activities \\n 7. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in cultural activities \\n 8. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in public\/community meetings \\n 9. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have a higher level of self-confidence \\n 10. % change in the HIV and other sexually transmitted disease infection rate among FXC, FS and FD \\n 11. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel safe to live in their community \\n 12. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel threatened by something or someone \\n 13. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel a sense of belonging to their community", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \n 1. % change in the number of female deaths, injuries, abductions, rapes and domestic violence cases reported among FXC, FS and FD \n 2. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who initiated and are maintaining income-generating activities \n 3. % change in the number of FXC and FS who joined the police services \n 4. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in peace-building activities \n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have access to health services (including counselling, contraceptives, family planning) \n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in political activities \n 7. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in cultural activities \n 8. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in public\/community meetings \n 9. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have a higher level of self-confidence \n 10. % change in the HIV and other sexually transmitted disease infection rate among FXC, FS and FD \n 11. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel safe to live in their community \n 12. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel threatened by something or someone \n 13. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel a sense of belonging to their community", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129288,14 +129288,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.3. Gender-responsive evaluation of outcomes\/results", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel threatened by something or someone \\n 13.", + "Sentence": "% change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel threatened by something or someone \n 13.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator compared baseline data n 1 change number female death injury abduction rape domestic violence case reported among fxc f fd n 2 change number fxc f fd initiated maintaining incomegenerating activity n 3 change number fxc f joined police service n 4 change number fxc f fd participating peacebuilding activity n 5 change number fxc f fd access health service including counselling contraceptive family planning n 6 change number fxc f fd participating political activity n 7 change number fxc f fd participating cultural activity n 8 change number fxc f fd participating publiccommunity meeting n 9 change number fxc f fd higher level selfconfidence n 10 change hiv sexually transmitted disease infection rate among fxc f fd n 11 change number fxc f fd feel safe live community n 12 change number fxc f fd feel threatened something someone n 13 change number fxc f fd feel sense belonging community", "ProcessedSent": " change number fxc f fd feel threatened something someone n 13", "SentID": 7182 }, { "ParagraphID": 2189, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \\n 1. % change in the number of female deaths, injuries, abductions, rapes and domestic violence cases reported among FXC, FS and FD \\n 2. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who initiated and are maintaining income-generating activities \\n 3. % change in the number of FXC and FS who joined the police services \\n 4. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in peace-building activities \\n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have access to health services (including counselling, contraceptives, family planning) \\n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in political activities \\n 7. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in cultural activities \\n 8. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in public\/community meetings \\n 9. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have a higher level of self-confidence \\n 10. % change in the HIV and other sexually transmitted disease infection rate among FXC, FS and FD \\n 11. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel safe to live in their community \\n 12. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel threatened by something or someone \\n 13. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel a sense of belonging to their community", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \n 1. % change in the number of female deaths, injuries, abductions, rapes and domestic violence cases reported among FXC, FS and FD \n 2. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who initiated and are maintaining income-generating activities \n 3. % change in the number of FXC and FS who joined the police services \n 4. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in peace-building activities \n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have access to health services (including counselling, contraceptives, family planning) \n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in political activities \n 7. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in cultural activities \n 8. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are participating in public\/community meetings \n 9. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who have a higher level of self-confidence \n 10. % change in the HIV and other sexually transmitted disease infection rate among FXC, FS and FD \n 11. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel safe to live in their community \n 12. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel threatened by something or someone \n 13. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who feel a sense of belonging to their community", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129313,7 +129313,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2190, - "Paragraph": "Purpose of evaluation: To examine (1) the impact of DDR on empowerment of female ex-combatants, FAAGFs and dependants; (2) the contribution of DDR programme towards the creation of gender-responsive community development: \\n Impact\/Long-term goals: (1) Community development; (2) sustainable peace; Gender dimensions of impact: (1) Gender equality in community development and peace; (2) empowerment of women; \\n\\n Data collection frequency: Every six months for at least one to three years after the completion of the programme.", + "Paragraph": "Purpose of evaluation: To examine (1) the impact of DDR on empowerment of female ex-combatants, FAAGFs and dependants; (2) the contribution of DDR programme towards the creation of gender-responsive community development: \n Impact\/Long-term goals: (1) Community development; (2) sustainable peace; Gender dimensions of impact: (1) Gender equality in community development and peace; (2) empowerment of women; \n\n Data collection frequency: Every six months for at least one to three years after the completion of the programme.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129324,14 +129324,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.4. Gender-responsive evaluation of impact", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Purpose of evaluation: To examine (1) the impact of DDR on empowerment of female ex-combatants, FAAGFs and dependants; (2) the contribution of DDR programme towards the creation of gender-responsive community development: \\n Impact\/Long-term goals: (1) Community development; (2) sustainable peace; Gender dimensions of impact: (1) Gender equality in community development and peace; (2) empowerment of women; \\n\\n Data collection frequency: Every six months for at least one to three years after the completion of the programme.", + "Sentence": "Purpose of evaluation: To examine (1) the impact of DDR on empowerment of female ex-combatants, FAAGFs and dependants; (2) the contribution of DDR programme towards the creation of gender-responsive community development: \n Impact\/Long-term goals: (1) Community development; (2) sustainable peace; Gender dimensions of impact: (1) Gender equality in community development and peace; (2) empowerment of women; \n\n Data collection frequency: Every six months for at least one to three years after the completion of the programme.", "newParagraph": "purpose evaluation examine 1 impact ddr empowerment female excombatants faagfs dependant 2 contribution ddr programme towards creation genderresponsive community development n impactlongterm goal 1 community development 2 sustainable peace gender dimension impact 1 gender equality community development peace 2 empowerment woman nn data collection frequency every six month least one three year completion programme", "ProcessedSent": "purpose evaluation examine 1 impact ddr empowerment female excombatants faagfs dependant 2 contribution ddr programme towards creation genderresponsive community development n impactlongterm goal 1 community development 2 sustainable peace gender dimension impact 1 gender equality community development peace 2 empowerment woman nn data collection frequency every six month least one three year completion programme", "SentID": 7184 }, { "ParagraphID": 2191, - "Paragraph": "Key questions to ask: \\n To what extent did the DDR programme empower female ex-combatants, FAAGFs and dependants? \\n To what extent did the reintegration programme encourage and support the creation of gender-responsive community development?", + "Paragraph": "Key questions to ask: \n To what extent did the DDR programme empower female ex-combatants, FAAGFs and dependants? \n To what extent did the reintegration programme encourage and support the creation of gender-responsive community development?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129342,14 +129342,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.4. Gender-responsive evaluation of impact", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Key questions to ask: \\n To what extent did the DDR programme empower female ex-combatants, FAAGFs and dependants?", + "Sentence": "Key questions to ask: \n To what extent did the DDR programme empower female ex-combatants, FAAGFs and dependants?", "newParagraph": "key question ask n extent ddr programme empower female excombatants faagfs dependant n extent reintegration programme encourage support creation genderresponsive community development", "ProcessedSent": "key question ask n extent ddr programme empower female excombatants faagfs dependant", "SentID": 7185 }, { "ParagraphID": 2191, - "Paragraph": "Key questions to ask: \\n To what extent did the DDR programme empower female ex-combatants, FAAGFs and dependants? \\n To what extent did the reintegration programme encourage and support the creation of gender-responsive community development?", + "Paragraph": "Key questions to ask: \n To what extent did the DDR programme empower female ex-combatants, FAAGFs and dependants? \n To what extent did the reintegration programme encourage and support the creation of gender-responsive community development?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129360,14 +129360,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.4. Gender-responsive evaluation of impact", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n To what extent did the reintegration programme encourage and support the creation of gender-responsive community development?", + "Sentence": "\n To what extent did the reintegration programme encourage and support the creation of gender-responsive community development?", "newParagraph": "key question ask n extent ddr programme empower female excombatants faagfs dependant n extent reintegration programme encourage support creation genderresponsive community development", "ProcessedSent": "n extent reintegration programme encourage support creation genderresponsive community development", "SentID": 7186 }, { "ParagraphID": 2192, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \\n 1. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who vote or\/and stand for national and local elections in the concerned country \\n 2. % change in the employment rate among FXC, FS and FD (in both formal and informal sectors) Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Women, Gender and DDR 37 5.10 \\n 3. % change in the literacy rate among FXC, FS and FD, and their children \\n 4. % change in disposable income among FXC, FS and FD, and their household \\n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are the members of any type of association, including women\u2019s NGOs and ex-combatant support networks \\n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are involved in the implementation\/management of community development programmes \\n 7. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations that receive(d) reintegration assistance and implement development-related programme\/project(s) \\n 8. % change in the number of female-specific development programmes supported by reintegration assistance to meet the needs of women and girls \\n 9. % change in the number of female participants in development programmes who receive reintegration assistance. \\n 10. % change in the number of communities with a high return rate of ex-combatants receiving reintegration assistance \\n 11. % change in the number of awareness campaigns on women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence supported by reintegration assistance \\n 12. Community perception of FXC, FS and FD \\n 13. Community perception of women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \n 1. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who vote or\/and stand for national and local elections in the concerned country \n 2. % change in the employment rate among FXC, FS and FD (in both formal and informal sectors) Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Women, Gender and DDR 37 5.10 \n 3. % change in the literacy rate among FXC, FS and FD, and their children \n 4. % change in disposable income among FXC, FS and FD, and their household \n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are the members of any type of association, including women\u2019s NGOs and ex-combatant support networks \n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are involved in the implementation\/management of community development programmes \n 7. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations that receive(d) reintegration assistance and implement development-related programme\/project(s) \n 8. % change in the number of female-specific development programmes supported by reintegration assistance to meet the needs of women and girls \n 9. % change in the number of female participants in development programmes who receive reintegration assistance. \n 10. % change in the number of communities with a high return rate of ex-combatants receiving reintegration assistance \n 11. % change in the number of awareness campaigns on women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence supported by reintegration assistance \n 12. Community perception of FXC, FS and FD \n 13. Community perception of women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129378,14 +129378,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.4. Gender-responsive evaluation of impact", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \\n 1.", + "Sentence": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \n 1.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator compared baseline data n 1 change number fxc f fd vote orand stand national local election concerned country n 2 change employment rate among fxc f fd formal informal sector level 5 crosscutting issue woman gender ddr 37 510 n 3 change literacy rate among fxc f fd child n 4 change disposable income among fxc f fd household n 5 change number fxc f fd member type association including woman ngo excombatant support network n 6 change number fxc f fd involved implementationmanagement community development programme n 7 change number woman organization received reintegration assistance implement developmentrelated programmeprojects n 8 change number femalespecific development programme supported reintegration assistance meet need woman girl n 9 change number female participant development programme receive reintegration assistance n 10 change number community high return rate excombatants receiving reintegration assistance n 11 change number awareness campaign woman human right genderbased violence supported reintegration assistance n 12 community perception fxc f fd n 13 community perception woman human right genderbased violence", "ProcessedSent": "key measurable indicator compared baseline data n 1", "SentID": 7187 }, { "ParagraphID": 2192, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \\n 1. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who vote or\/and stand for national and local elections in the concerned country \\n 2. % change in the employment rate among FXC, FS and FD (in both formal and informal sectors) Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Women, Gender and DDR 37 5.10 \\n 3. % change in the literacy rate among FXC, FS and FD, and their children \\n 4. % change in disposable income among FXC, FS and FD, and their household \\n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are the members of any type of association, including women\u2019s NGOs and ex-combatant support networks \\n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are involved in the implementation\/management of community development programmes \\n 7. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations that receive(d) reintegration assistance and implement development-related programme\/project(s) \\n 8. % change in the number of female-specific development programmes supported by reintegration assistance to meet the needs of women and girls \\n 9. % change in the number of female participants in development programmes who receive reintegration assistance. \\n 10. % change in the number of communities with a high return rate of ex-combatants receiving reintegration assistance \\n 11. % change in the number of awareness campaigns on women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence supported by reintegration assistance \\n 12. Community perception of FXC, FS and FD \\n 13. Community perception of women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \n 1. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who vote or\/and stand for national and local elections in the concerned country \n 2. % change in the employment rate among FXC, FS and FD (in both formal and informal sectors) Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Women, Gender and DDR 37 5.10 \n 3. % change in the literacy rate among FXC, FS and FD, and their children \n 4. % change in disposable income among FXC, FS and FD, and their household \n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are the members of any type of association, including women\u2019s NGOs and ex-combatant support networks \n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are involved in the implementation\/management of community development programmes \n 7. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations that receive(d) reintegration assistance and implement development-related programme\/project(s) \n 8. % change in the number of female-specific development programmes supported by reintegration assistance to meet the needs of women and girls \n 9. % change in the number of female participants in development programmes who receive reintegration assistance. \n 10. % change in the number of communities with a high return rate of ex-combatants receiving reintegration assistance \n 11. % change in the number of awareness campaigns on women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence supported by reintegration assistance \n 12. Community perception of FXC, FS and FD \n 13. Community perception of women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129396,14 +129396,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.4. Gender-responsive evaluation of impact", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who vote or\/and stand for national and local elections in the concerned country \\n 2.", + "Sentence": "% change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who vote or\/and stand for national and local elections in the concerned country \n 2.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator compared baseline data n 1 change number fxc f fd vote orand stand national local election concerned country n 2 change employment rate among fxc f fd formal informal sector level 5 crosscutting issue woman gender ddr 37 510 n 3 change literacy rate among fxc f fd child n 4 change disposable income among fxc f fd household n 5 change number fxc f fd member type association including woman ngo excombatant support network n 6 change number fxc f fd involved implementationmanagement community development programme n 7 change number woman organization received reintegration assistance implement developmentrelated programmeprojects n 8 change number femalespecific development programme supported reintegration assistance meet need woman girl n 9 change number female participant development programme receive reintegration assistance n 10 change number community high return rate excombatants receiving reintegration assistance n 11 change number awareness campaign woman human right genderbased violence supported reintegration assistance n 12 community perception fxc f fd n 13 community perception woman human right genderbased violence", "ProcessedSent": " change number fxc f fd vote orand stand national local election concerned country n 2", "SentID": 7188 }, { "ParagraphID": 2192, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \\n 1. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who vote or\/and stand for national and local elections in the concerned country \\n 2. % change in the employment rate among FXC, FS and FD (in both formal and informal sectors) Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Women, Gender and DDR 37 5.10 \\n 3. % change in the literacy rate among FXC, FS and FD, and their children \\n 4. % change in disposable income among FXC, FS and FD, and their household \\n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are the members of any type of association, including women\u2019s NGOs and ex-combatant support networks \\n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are involved in the implementation\/management of community development programmes \\n 7. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations that receive(d) reintegration assistance and implement development-related programme\/project(s) \\n 8. % change in the number of female-specific development programmes supported by reintegration assistance to meet the needs of women and girls \\n 9. % change in the number of female participants in development programmes who receive reintegration assistance. \\n 10. % change in the number of communities with a high return rate of ex-combatants receiving reintegration assistance \\n 11. % change in the number of awareness campaigns on women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence supported by reintegration assistance \\n 12. Community perception of FXC, FS and FD \\n 13. Community perception of women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \n 1. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who vote or\/and stand for national and local elections in the concerned country \n 2. % change in the employment rate among FXC, FS and FD (in both formal and informal sectors) Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Women, Gender and DDR 37 5.10 \n 3. % change in the literacy rate among FXC, FS and FD, and their children \n 4. % change in disposable income among FXC, FS and FD, and their household \n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are the members of any type of association, including women\u2019s NGOs and ex-combatant support networks \n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are involved in the implementation\/management of community development programmes \n 7. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations that receive(d) reintegration assistance and implement development-related programme\/project(s) \n 8. % change in the number of female-specific development programmes supported by reintegration assistance to meet the needs of women and girls \n 9. % change in the number of female participants in development programmes who receive reintegration assistance. \n 10. % change in the number of communities with a high return rate of ex-combatants receiving reintegration assistance \n 11. % change in the number of awareness campaigns on women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence supported by reintegration assistance \n 12. Community perception of FXC, FS and FD \n 13. Community perception of women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129414,14 +129414,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.4. Gender-responsive evaluation of impact", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% change in the employment rate among FXC, FS and FD (in both formal and informal sectors) Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Women, Gender and DDR 37 5.10 \\n 3.", + "Sentence": "% change in the employment rate among FXC, FS and FD (in both formal and informal sectors) Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Women, Gender and DDR 37 5.10 \n 3.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator compared baseline data n 1 change number fxc f fd vote orand stand national local election concerned country n 2 change employment rate among fxc f fd formal informal sector level 5 crosscutting issue woman gender ddr 37 510 n 3 change literacy rate among fxc f fd child n 4 change disposable income among fxc f fd household n 5 change number fxc f fd member type association including woman ngo excombatant support network n 6 change number fxc f fd involved implementationmanagement community development programme n 7 change number woman organization received reintegration assistance implement developmentrelated programmeprojects n 8 change number femalespecific development programme supported reintegration assistance meet need woman girl n 9 change number female participant development programme receive reintegration assistance n 10 change number community high return rate excombatants receiving reintegration assistance n 11 change number awareness campaign woman human right genderbased violence supported reintegration assistance n 12 community perception fxc f fd n 13 community perception woman human right genderbased violence", "ProcessedSent": " change employment rate among fxc f fd formal informal sector level 5 crosscutting issue woman gender ddr 37 510 n 3", "SentID": 7189 }, { "ParagraphID": 2192, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \\n 1. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who vote or\/and stand for national and local elections in the concerned country \\n 2. % change in the employment rate among FXC, FS and FD (in both formal and informal sectors) Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Women, Gender and DDR 37 5.10 \\n 3. % change in the literacy rate among FXC, FS and FD, and their children \\n 4. % change in disposable income among FXC, FS and FD, and their household \\n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are the members of any type of association, including women\u2019s NGOs and ex-combatant support networks \\n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are involved in the implementation\/management of community development programmes \\n 7. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations that receive(d) reintegration assistance and implement development-related programme\/project(s) \\n 8. % change in the number of female-specific development programmes supported by reintegration assistance to meet the needs of women and girls \\n 9. % change in the number of female participants in development programmes who receive reintegration assistance. \\n 10. % change in the number of communities with a high return rate of ex-combatants receiving reintegration assistance \\n 11. % change in the number of awareness campaigns on women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence supported by reintegration assistance \\n 12. Community perception of FXC, FS and FD \\n 13. Community perception of women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \n 1. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who vote or\/and stand for national and local elections in the concerned country \n 2. % change in the employment rate among FXC, FS and FD (in both formal and informal sectors) Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Women, Gender and DDR 37 5.10 \n 3. % change in the literacy rate among FXC, FS and FD, and their children \n 4. % change in disposable income among FXC, FS and FD, and their household \n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are the members of any type of association, including women\u2019s NGOs and ex-combatant support networks \n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are involved in the implementation\/management of community development programmes \n 7. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations that receive(d) reintegration assistance and implement development-related programme\/project(s) \n 8. % change in the number of female-specific development programmes supported by reintegration assistance to meet the needs of women and girls \n 9. % change in the number of female participants in development programmes who receive reintegration assistance. \n 10. % change in the number of communities with a high return rate of ex-combatants receiving reintegration assistance \n 11. % change in the number of awareness campaigns on women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence supported by reintegration assistance \n 12. Community perception of FXC, FS and FD \n 13. Community perception of women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129432,14 +129432,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.4. Gender-responsive evaluation of impact", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% change in the literacy rate among FXC, FS and FD, and their children \\n 4.", + "Sentence": "% change in the literacy rate among FXC, FS and FD, and their children \n 4.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator compared baseline data n 1 change number fxc f fd vote orand stand national local election concerned country n 2 change employment rate among fxc f fd formal informal sector level 5 crosscutting issue woman gender ddr 37 510 n 3 change literacy rate among fxc f fd child n 4 change disposable income among fxc f fd household n 5 change number fxc f fd member type association including woman ngo excombatant support network n 6 change number fxc f fd involved implementationmanagement community development programme n 7 change number woman organization received reintegration assistance implement developmentrelated programmeprojects n 8 change number femalespecific development programme supported reintegration assistance meet need woman girl n 9 change number female participant development programme receive reintegration assistance n 10 change number community high return rate excombatants receiving reintegration assistance n 11 change number awareness campaign woman human right genderbased violence supported reintegration assistance n 12 community perception fxc f fd n 13 community perception woman human right genderbased violence", "ProcessedSent": " change literacy rate among fxc f fd child n 4", "SentID": 7190 }, { "ParagraphID": 2192, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \\n 1. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who vote or\/and stand for national and local elections in the concerned country \\n 2. % change in the employment rate among FXC, FS and FD (in both formal and informal sectors) Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Women, Gender and DDR 37 5.10 \\n 3. % change in the literacy rate among FXC, FS and FD, and their children \\n 4. % change in disposable income among FXC, FS and FD, and their household \\n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are the members of any type of association, including women\u2019s NGOs and ex-combatant support networks \\n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are involved in the implementation\/management of community development programmes \\n 7. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations that receive(d) reintegration assistance and implement development-related programme\/project(s) \\n 8. % change in the number of female-specific development programmes supported by reintegration assistance to meet the needs of women and girls \\n 9. % change in the number of female participants in development programmes who receive reintegration assistance. \\n 10. % change in the number of communities with a high return rate of ex-combatants receiving reintegration assistance \\n 11. % change in the number of awareness campaigns on women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence supported by reintegration assistance \\n 12. Community perception of FXC, FS and FD \\n 13. Community perception of women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \n 1. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who vote or\/and stand for national and local elections in the concerned country \n 2. % change in the employment rate among FXC, FS and FD (in both formal and informal sectors) Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Women, Gender and DDR 37 5.10 \n 3. % change in the literacy rate among FXC, FS and FD, and their children \n 4. % change in disposable income among FXC, FS and FD, and their household \n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are the members of any type of association, including women\u2019s NGOs and ex-combatant support networks \n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are involved in the implementation\/management of community development programmes \n 7. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations that receive(d) reintegration assistance and implement development-related programme\/project(s) \n 8. % change in the number of female-specific development programmes supported by reintegration assistance to meet the needs of women and girls \n 9. % change in the number of female participants in development programmes who receive reintegration assistance. \n 10. % change in the number of communities with a high return rate of ex-combatants receiving reintegration assistance \n 11. % change in the number of awareness campaigns on women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence supported by reintegration assistance \n 12. Community perception of FXC, FS and FD \n 13. Community perception of women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129450,14 +129450,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.4. Gender-responsive evaluation of impact", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% change in disposable income among FXC, FS and FD, and their household \\n 5.", + "Sentence": "% change in disposable income among FXC, FS and FD, and their household \n 5.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator compared baseline data n 1 change number fxc f fd vote orand stand national local election concerned country n 2 change employment rate among fxc f fd formal informal sector level 5 crosscutting issue woman gender ddr 37 510 n 3 change literacy rate among fxc f fd child n 4 change disposable income among fxc f fd household n 5 change number fxc f fd member type association including woman ngo excombatant support network n 6 change number fxc f fd involved implementationmanagement community development programme n 7 change number woman organization received reintegration assistance implement developmentrelated programmeprojects n 8 change number femalespecific development programme supported reintegration assistance meet need woman girl n 9 change number female participant development programme receive reintegration assistance n 10 change number community high return rate excombatants receiving reintegration assistance n 11 change number awareness campaign woman human right genderbased violence supported reintegration assistance n 12 community perception fxc f fd n 13 community perception woman human right genderbased violence", "ProcessedSent": " change disposable income among fxc f fd household n 5", "SentID": 7191 }, { "ParagraphID": 2192, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \\n 1. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who vote or\/and stand for national and local elections in the concerned country \\n 2. % change in the employment rate among FXC, FS and FD (in both formal and informal sectors) Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Women, Gender and DDR 37 5.10 \\n 3. % change in the literacy rate among FXC, FS and FD, and their children \\n 4. % change in disposable income among FXC, FS and FD, and their household \\n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are the members of any type of association, including women\u2019s NGOs and ex-combatant support networks \\n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are involved in the implementation\/management of community development programmes \\n 7. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations that receive(d) reintegration assistance and implement development-related programme\/project(s) \\n 8. % change in the number of female-specific development programmes supported by reintegration assistance to meet the needs of women and girls \\n 9. % change in the number of female participants in development programmes who receive reintegration assistance. \\n 10. % change in the number of communities with a high return rate of ex-combatants receiving reintegration assistance \\n 11. % change in the number of awareness campaigns on women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence supported by reintegration assistance \\n 12. Community perception of FXC, FS and FD \\n 13. Community perception of women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \n 1. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who vote or\/and stand for national and local elections in the concerned country \n 2. % change in the employment rate among FXC, FS and FD (in both formal and informal sectors) Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Women, Gender and DDR 37 5.10 \n 3. % change in the literacy rate among FXC, FS and FD, and their children \n 4. % change in disposable income among FXC, FS and FD, and their household \n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are the members of any type of association, including women\u2019s NGOs and ex-combatant support networks \n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are involved in the implementation\/management of community development programmes \n 7. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations that receive(d) reintegration assistance and implement development-related programme\/project(s) \n 8. % change in the number of female-specific development programmes supported by reintegration assistance to meet the needs of women and girls \n 9. % change in the number of female participants in development programmes who receive reintegration assistance. \n 10. % change in the number of communities with a high return rate of ex-combatants receiving reintegration assistance \n 11. % change in the number of awareness campaigns on women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence supported by reintegration assistance \n 12. Community perception of FXC, FS and FD \n 13. Community perception of women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129468,14 +129468,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.4. Gender-responsive evaluation of impact", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are the members of any type of association, including women\u2019s NGOs and ex-combatant support networks \\n 6.", + "Sentence": "% change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are the members of any type of association, including women\u2019s NGOs and ex-combatant support networks \n 6.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator compared baseline data n 1 change number fxc f fd vote orand stand national local election concerned country n 2 change employment rate among fxc f fd formal informal sector level 5 crosscutting issue woman gender ddr 37 510 n 3 change literacy rate among fxc f fd child n 4 change disposable income among fxc f fd household n 5 change number fxc f fd member type association including woman ngo excombatant support network n 6 change number fxc f fd involved implementationmanagement community development programme n 7 change number woman organization received reintegration assistance implement developmentrelated programmeprojects n 8 change number femalespecific development programme supported reintegration assistance meet need woman girl n 9 change number female participant development programme receive reintegration assistance n 10 change number community high return rate excombatants receiving reintegration assistance n 11 change number awareness campaign woman human right genderbased violence supported reintegration assistance n 12 community perception fxc f fd n 13 community perception woman human right genderbased violence", "ProcessedSent": " change number fxc f fd member type association including woman ngo excombatant support network n 6", "SentID": 7192 }, { "ParagraphID": 2192, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \\n 1. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who vote or\/and stand for national and local elections in the concerned country \\n 2. % change in the employment rate among FXC, FS and FD (in both formal and informal sectors) Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Women, Gender and DDR 37 5.10 \\n 3. % change in the literacy rate among FXC, FS and FD, and their children \\n 4. % change in disposable income among FXC, FS and FD, and their household \\n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are the members of any type of association, including women\u2019s NGOs and ex-combatant support networks \\n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are involved in the implementation\/management of community development programmes \\n 7. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations that receive(d) reintegration assistance and implement development-related programme\/project(s) \\n 8. % change in the number of female-specific development programmes supported by reintegration assistance to meet the needs of women and girls \\n 9. % change in the number of female participants in development programmes who receive reintegration assistance. \\n 10. % change in the number of communities with a high return rate of ex-combatants receiving reintegration assistance \\n 11. % change in the number of awareness campaigns on women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence supported by reintegration assistance \\n 12. Community perception of FXC, FS and FD \\n 13. Community perception of women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \n 1. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who vote or\/and stand for national and local elections in the concerned country \n 2. % change in the employment rate among FXC, FS and FD (in both formal and informal sectors) Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Women, Gender and DDR 37 5.10 \n 3. % change in the literacy rate among FXC, FS and FD, and their children \n 4. % change in disposable income among FXC, FS and FD, and their household \n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are the members of any type of association, including women\u2019s NGOs and ex-combatant support networks \n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are involved in the implementation\/management of community development programmes \n 7. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations that receive(d) reintegration assistance and implement development-related programme\/project(s) \n 8. % change in the number of female-specific development programmes supported by reintegration assistance to meet the needs of women and girls \n 9. % change in the number of female participants in development programmes who receive reintegration assistance. \n 10. % change in the number of communities with a high return rate of ex-combatants receiving reintegration assistance \n 11. % change in the number of awareness campaigns on women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence supported by reintegration assistance \n 12. Community perception of FXC, FS and FD \n 13. Community perception of women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129486,14 +129486,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.4. Gender-responsive evaluation of impact", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are involved in the implementation\/management of community development programmes \\n 7.", + "Sentence": "% change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are involved in the implementation\/management of community development programmes \n 7.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator compared baseline data n 1 change number fxc f fd vote orand stand national local election concerned country n 2 change employment rate among fxc f fd formal informal sector level 5 crosscutting issue woman gender ddr 37 510 n 3 change literacy rate among fxc f fd child n 4 change disposable income among fxc f fd household n 5 change number fxc f fd member type association including woman ngo excombatant support network n 6 change number fxc f fd involved implementationmanagement community development programme n 7 change number woman organization received reintegration assistance implement developmentrelated programmeprojects n 8 change number femalespecific development programme supported reintegration assistance meet need woman girl n 9 change number female participant development programme receive reintegration assistance n 10 change number community high return rate excombatants receiving reintegration assistance n 11 change number awareness campaign woman human right genderbased violence supported reintegration assistance n 12 community perception fxc f fd n 13 community perception woman human right genderbased violence", "ProcessedSent": " change number fxc f fd involved implementationmanagement community development programme n 7", "SentID": 7193 }, { "ParagraphID": 2192, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \\n 1. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who vote or\/and stand for national and local elections in the concerned country \\n 2. % change in the employment rate among FXC, FS and FD (in both formal and informal sectors) Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Women, Gender and DDR 37 5.10 \\n 3. % change in the literacy rate among FXC, FS and FD, and their children \\n 4. % change in disposable income among FXC, FS and FD, and their household \\n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are the members of any type of association, including women\u2019s NGOs and ex-combatant support networks \\n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are involved in the implementation\/management of community development programmes \\n 7. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations that receive(d) reintegration assistance and implement development-related programme\/project(s) \\n 8. % change in the number of female-specific development programmes supported by reintegration assistance to meet the needs of women and girls \\n 9. % change in the number of female participants in development programmes who receive reintegration assistance. \\n 10. % change in the number of communities with a high return rate of ex-combatants receiving reintegration assistance \\n 11. % change in the number of awareness campaigns on women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence supported by reintegration assistance \\n 12. Community perception of FXC, FS and FD \\n 13. Community perception of women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \n 1. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who vote or\/and stand for national and local elections in the concerned country \n 2. % change in the employment rate among FXC, FS and FD (in both formal and informal sectors) Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Women, Gender and DDR 37 5.10 \n 3. % change in the literacy rate among FXC, FS and FD, and their children \n 4. % change in disposable income among FXC, FS and FD, and their household \n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are the members of any type of association, including women\u2019s NGOs and ex-combatant support networks \n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are involved in the implementation\/management of community development programmes \n 7. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations that receive(d) reintegration assistance and implement development-related programme\/project(s) \n 8. % change in the number of female-specific development programmes supported by reintegration assistance to meet the needs of women and girls \n 9. % change in the number of female participants in development programmes who receive reintegration assistance. \n 10. % change in the number of communities with a high return rate of ex-combatants receiving reintegration assistance \n 11. % change in the number of awareness campaigns on women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence supported by reintegration assistance \n 12. Community perception of FXC, FS and FD \n 13. Community perception of women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129504,14 +129504,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.4. Gender-responsive evaluation of impact", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% change in the number of women\u2019s organizations that receive(d) reintegration assistance and implement development-related programme\/project(s) \\n 8.", + "Sentence": "% change in the number of women\u2019s organizations that receive(d) reintegration assistance and implement development-related programme\/project(s) \n 8.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator compared baseline data n 1 change number fxc f fd vote orand stand national local election concerned country n 2 change employment rate among fxc f fd formal informal sector level 5 crosscutting issue woman gender ddr 37 510 n 3 change literacy rate among fxc f fd child n 4 change disposable income among fxc f fd household n 5 change number fxc f fd member type association including woman ngo excombatant support network n 6 change number fxc f fd involved implementationmanagement community development programme n 7 change number woman organization received reintegration assistance implement developmentrelated programmeprojects n 8 change number femalespecific development programme supported reintegration assistance meet need woman girl n 9 change number female participant development programme receive reintegration assistance n 10 change number community high return rate excombatants receiving reintegration assistance n 11 change number awareness campaign woman human right genderbased violence supported reintegration assistance n 12 community perception fxc f fd n 13 community perception woman human right genderbased violence", "ProcessedSent": " change number woman organization received reintegration assistance implement developmentrelated programmeprojects n 8", "SentID": 7194 }, { "ParagraphID": 2192, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \\n 1. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who vote or\/and stand for national and local elections in the concerned country \\n 2. % change in the employment rate among FXC, FS and FD (in both formal and informal sectors) Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Women, Gender and DDR 37 5.10 \\n 3. % change in the literacy rate among FXC, FS and FD, and their children \\n 4. % change in disposable income among FXC, FS and FD, and their household \\n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are the members of any type of association, including women\u2019s NGOs and ex-combatant support networks \\n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are involved in the implementation\/management of community development programmes \\n 7. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations that receive(d) reintegration assistance and implement development-related programme\/project(s) \\n 8. % change in the number of female-specific development programmes supported by reintegration assistance to meet the needs of women and girls \\n 9. % change in the number of female participants in development programmes who receive reintegration assistance. \\n 10. % change in the number of communities with a high return rate of ex-combatants receiving reintegration assistance \\n 11. % change in the number of awareness campaigns on women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence supported by reintegration assistance \\n 12. Community perception of FXC, FS and FD \\n 13. Community perception of women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \n 1. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who vote or\/and stand for national and local elections in the concerned country \n 2. % change in the employment rate among FXC, FS and FD (in both formal and informal sectors) Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Women, Gender and DDR 37 5.10 \n 3. % change in the literacy rate among FXC, FS and FD, and their children \n 4. % change in disposable income among FXC, FS and FD, and their household \n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are the members of any type of association, including women\u2019s NGOs and ex-combatant support networks \n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are involved in the implementation\/management of community development programmes \n 7. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations that receive(d) reintegration assistance and implement development-related programme\/project(s) \n 8. % change in the number of female-specific development programmes supported by reintegration assistance to meet the needs of women and girls \n 9. % change in the number of female participants in development programmes who receive reintegration assistance. \n 10. % change in the number of communities with a high return rate of ex-combatants receiving reintegration assistance \n 11. % change in the number of awareness campaigns on women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence supported by reintegration assistance \n 12. Community perception of FXC, FS and FD \n 13. Community perception of women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129522,14 +129522,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.4. Gender-responsive evaluation of impact", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% change in the number of female-specific development programmes supported by reintegration assistance to meet the needs of women and girls \\n 9.", + "Sentence": "% change in the number of female-specific development programmes supported by reintegration assistance to meet the needs of women and girls \n 9.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator compared baseline data n 1 change number fxc f fd vote orand stand national local election concerned country n 2 change employment rate among fxc f fd formal informal sector level 5 crosscutting issue woman gender ddr 37 510 n 3 change literacy rate among fxc f fd child n 4 change disposable income among fxc f fd household n 5 change number fxc f fd member type association including woman ngo excombatant support network n 6 change number fxc f fd involved implementationmanagement community development programme n 7 change number woman organization received reintegration assistance implement developmentrelated programmeprojects n 8 change number femalespecific development programme supported reintegration assistance meet need woman girl n 9 change number female participant development programme receive reintegration assistance n 10 change number community high return rate excombatants receiving reintegration assistance n 11 change number awareness campaign woman human right genderbased violence supported reintegration assistance n 12 community perception fxc f fd n 13 community perception woman human right genderbased violence", "ProcessedSent": " change number femalespecific development programme supported reintegration assistance meet need woman girl n 9", "SentID": 7195 }, { "ParagraphID": 2192, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \\n 1. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who vote or\/and stand for national and local elections in the concerned country \\n 2. % change in the employment rate among FXC, FS and FD (in both formal and informal sectors) Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Women, Gender and DDR 37 5.10 \\n 3. % change in the literacy rate among FXC, FS and FD, and their children \\n 4. % change in disposable income among FXC, FS and FD, and their household \\n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are the members of any type of association, including women\u2019s NGOs and ex-combatant support networks \\n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are involved in the implementation\/management of community development programmes \\n 7. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations that receive(d) reintegration assistance and implement development-related programme\/project(s) \\n 8. % change in the number of female-specific development programmes supported by reintegration assistance to meet the needs of women and girls \\n 9. % change in the number of female participants in development programmes who receive reintegration assistance. \\n 10. % change in the number of communities with a high return rate of ex-combatants receiving reintegration assistance \\n 11. % change in the number of awareness campaigns on women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence supported by reintegration assistance \\n 12. Community perception of FXC, FS and FD \\n 13. Community perception of women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \n 1. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who vote or\/and stand for national and local elections in the concerned country \n 2. % change in the employment rate among FXC, FS and FD (in both formal and informal sectors) Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Women, Gender and DDR 37 5.10 \n 3. % change in the literacy rate among FXC, FS and FD, and their children \n 4. % change in disposable income among FXC, FS and FD, and their household \n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are the members of any type of association, including women\u2019s NGOs and ex-combatant support networks \n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are involved in the implementation\/management of community development programmes \n 7. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations that receive(d) reintegration assistance and implement development-related programme\/project(s) \n 8. % change in the number of female-specific development programmes supported by reintegration assistance to meet the needs of women and girls \n 9. % change in the number of female participants in development programmes who receive reintegration assistance. \n 10. % change in the number of communities with a high return rate of ex-combatants receiving reintegration assistance \n 11. % change in the number of awareness campaigns on women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence supported by reintegration assistance \n 12. Community perception of FXC, FS and FD \n 13. Community perception of women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129547,7 +129547,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2192, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \\n 1. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who vote or\/and stand for national and local elections in the concerned country \\n 2. % change in the employment rate among FXC, FS and FD (in both formal and informal sectors) Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Women, Gender and DDR 37 5.10 \\n 3. % change in the literacy rate among FXC, FS and FD, and their children \\n 4. % change in disposable income among FXC, FS and FD, and their household \\n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are the members of any type of association, including women\u2019s NGOs and ex-combatant support networks \\n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are involved in the implementation\/management of community development programmes \\n 7. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations that receive(d) reintegration assistance and implement development-related programme\/project(s) \\n 8. % change in the number of female-specific development programmes supported by reintegration assistance to meet the needs of women and girls \\n 9. % change in the number of female participants in development programmes who receive reintegration assistance. \\n 10. % change in the number of communities with a high return rate of ex-combatants receiving reintegration assistance \\n 11. % change in the number of awareness campaigns on women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence supported by reintegration assistance \\n 12. Community perception of FXC, FS and FD \\n 13. Community perception of women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \n 1. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who vote or\/and stand for national and local elections in the concerned country \n 2. % change in the employment rate among FXC, FS and FD (in both formal and informal sectors) Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Women, Gender and DDR 37 5.10 \n 3. % change in the literacy rate among FXC, FS and FD, and their children \n 4. % change in disposable income among FXC, FS and FD, and their household \n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are the members of any type of association, including women\u2019s NGOs and ex-combatant support networks \n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are involved in the implementation\/management of community development programmes \n 7. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations that receive(d) reintegration assistance and implement development-related programme\/project(s) \n 8. % change in the number of female-specific development programmes supported by reintegration assistance to meet the needs of women and girls \n 9. % change in the number of female participants in development programmes who receive reintegration assistance. \n 10. % change in the number of communities with a high return rate of ex-combatants receiving reintegration assistance \n 11. % change in the number of awareness campaigns on women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence supported by reintegration assistance \n 12. Community perception of FXC, FS and FD \n 13. Community perception of women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129558,14 +129558,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.4. Gender-responsive evaluation of impact", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 10.", + "Sentence": "\n 10.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator compared baseline data n 1 change number fxc f fd vote orand stand national local election concerned country n 2 change employment rate among fxc f fd formal informal sector level 5 crosscutting issue woman gender ddr 37 510 n 3 change literacy rate among fxc f fd child n 4 change disposable income among fxc f fd household n 5 change number fxc f fd member type association including woman ngo excombatant support network n 6 change number fxc f fd involved implementationmanagement community development programme n 7 change number woman organization received reintegration assistance implement developmentrelated programmeprojects n 8 change number femalespecific development programme supported reintegration assistance meet need woman girl n 9 change number female participant development programme receive reintegration assistance n 10 change number community high return rate excombatants receiving reintegration assistance n 11 change number awareness campaign woman human right genderbased violence supported reintegration assistance n 12 community perception fxc f fd n 13 community perception woman human right genderbased violence", "ProcessedSent": "n 10", "SentID": 7197 }, { "ParagraphID": 2192, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \\n 1. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who vote or\/and stand for national and local elections in the concerned country \\n 2. % change in the employment rate among FXC, FS and FD (in both formal and informal sectors) Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Women, Gender and DDR 37 5.10 \\n 3. % change in the literacy rate among FXC, FS and FD, and their children \\n 4. % change in disposable income among FXC, FS and FD, and their household \\n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are the members of any type of association, including women\u2019s NGOs and ex-combatant support networks \\n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are involved in the implementation\/management of community development programmes \\n 7. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations that receive(d) reintegration assistance and implement development-related programme\/project(s) \\n 8. % change in the number of female-specific development programmes supported by reintegration assistance to meet the needs of women and girls \\n 9. % change in the number of female participants in development programmes who receive reintegration assistance. \\n 10. % change in the number of communities with a high return rate of ex-combatants receiving reintegration assistance \\n 11. % change in the number of awareness campaigns on women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence supported by reintegration assistance \\n 12. Community perception of FXC, FS and FD \\n 13. Community perception of women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \n 1. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who vote or\/and stand for national and local elections in the concerned country \n 2. % change in the employment rate among FXC, FS and FD (in both formal and informal sectors) Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Women, Gender and DDR 37 5.10 \n 3. % change in the literacy rate among FXC, FS and FD, and their children \n 4. % change in disposable income among FXC, FS and FD, and their household \n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are the members of any type of association, including women\u2019s NGOs and ex-combatant support networks \n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are involved in the implementation\/management of community development programmes \n 7. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations that receive(d) reintegration assistance and implement development-related programme\/project(s) \n 8. % change in the number of female-specific development programmes supported by reintegration assistance to meet the needs of women and girls \n 9. % change in the number of female participants in development programmes who receive reintegration assistance. \n 10. % change in the number of communities with a high return rate of ex-combatants receiving reintegration assistance \n 11. % change in the number of awareness campaigns on women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence supported by reintegration assistance \n 12. Community perception of FXC, FS and FD \n 13. Community perception of women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129576,14 +129576,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.4. Gender-responsive evaluation of impact", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% change in the number of communities with a high return rate of ex-combatants receiving reintegration assistance \\n 11.", + "Sentence": "% change in the number of communities with a high return rate of ex-combatants receiving reintegration assistance \n 11.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator compared baseline data n 1 change number fxc f fd vote orand stand national local election concerned country n 2 change employment rate among fxc f fd formal informal sector level 5 crosscutting issue woman gender ddr 37 510 n 3 change literacy rate among fxc f fd child n 4 change disposable income among fxc f fd household n 5 change number fxc f fd member type association including woman ngo excombatant support network n 6 change number fxc f fd involved implementationmanagement community development programme n 7 change number woman organization received reintegration assistance implement developmentrelated programmeprojects n 8 change number femalespecific development programme supported reintegration assistance meet need woman girl n 9 change number female participant development programme receive reintegration assistance n 10 change number community high return rate excombatants receiving reintegration assistance n 11 change number awareness campaign woman human right genderbased violence supported reintegration assistance n 12 community perception fxc f fd n 13 community perception woman human right genderbased violence", "ProcessedSent": " change number community high return rate excombatants receiving reintegration assistance n 11", "SentID": 7198 }, { "ParagraphID": 2192, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \\n 1. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who vote or\/and stand for national and local elections in the concerned country \\n 2. % change in the employment rate among FXC, FS and FD (in both formal and informal sectors) Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Women, Gender and DDR 37 5.10 \\n 3. % change in the literacy rate among FXC, FS and FD, and their children \\n 4. % change in disposable income among FXC, FS and FD, and their household \\n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are the members of any type of association, including women\u2019s NGOs and ex-combatant support networks \\n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are involved in the implementation\/management of community development programmes \\n 7. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations that receive(d) reintegration assistance and implement development-related programme\/project(s) \\n 8. % change in the number of female-specific development programmes supported by reintegration assistance to meet the needs of women and girls \\n 9. % change in the number of female participants in development programmes who receive reintegration assistance. \\n 10. % change in the number of communities with a high return rate of ex-combatants receiving reintegration assistance \\n 11. % change in the number of awareness campaigns on women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence supported by reintegration assistance \\n 12. Community perception of FXC, FS and FD \\n 13. Community perception of women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \n 1. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who vote or\/and stand for national and local elections in the concerned country \n 2. % change in the employment rate among FXC, FS and FD (in both formal and informal sectors) Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Women, Gender and DDR 37 5.10 \n 3. % change in the literacy rate among FXC, FS and FD, and their children \n 4. % change in disposable income among FXC, FS and FD, and their household \n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are the members of any type of association, including women\u2019s NGOs and ex-combatant support networks \n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are involved in the implementation\/management of community development programmes \n 7. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations that receive(d) reintegration assistance and implement development-related programme\/project(s) \n 8. % change in the number of female-specific development programmes supported by reintegration assistance to meet the needs of women and girls \n 9. % change in the number of female participants in development programmes who receive reintegration assistance. \n 10. % change in the number of communities with a high return rate of ex-combatants receiving reintegration assistance \n 11. % change in the number of awareness campaigns on women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence supported by reintegration assistance \n 12. Community perception of FXC, FS and FD \n 13. Community perception of women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129594,14 +129594,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.4. Gender-responsive evaluation of impact", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% change in the number of awareness campaigns on women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence supported by reintegration assistance \\n 12.", + "Sentence": "% change in the number of awareness campaigns on women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence supported by reintegration assistance \n 12.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator compared baseline data n 1 change number fxc f fd vote orand stand national local election concerned country n 2 change employment rate among fxc f fd formal informal sector level 5 crosscutting issue woman gender ddr 37 510 n 3 change literacy rate among fxc f fd child n 4 change disposable income among fxc f fd household n 5 change number fxc f fd member type association including woman ngo excombatant support network n 6 change number fxc f fd involved implementationmanagement community development programme n 7 change number woman organization received reintegration assistance implement developmentrelated programmeprojects n 8 change number femalespecific development programme supported reintegration assistance meet need woman girl n 9 change number female participant development programme receive reintegration assistance n 10 change number community high return rate excombatants receiving reintegration assistance n 11 change number awareness campaign woman human right genderbased violence supported reintegration assistance n 12 community perception fxc f fd n 13 community perception woman human right genderbased violence", "ProcessedSent": " change number awareness campaign woman human right genderbased violence supported reintegration assistance n 12", "SentID": 7199 }, { "ParagraphID": 2192, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \\n 1. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who vote or\/and stand for national and local elections in the concerned country \\n 2. % change in the employment rate among FXC, FS and FD (in both formal and informal sectors) Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Women, Gender and DDR 37 5.10 \\n 3. % change in the literacy rate among FXC, FS and FD, and their children \\n 4. % change in disposable income among FXC, FS and FD, and their household \\n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are the members of any type of association, including women\u2019s NGOs and ex-combatant support networks \\n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are involved in the implementation\/management of community development programmes \\n 7. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations that receive(d) reintegration assistance and implement development-related programme\/project(s) \\n 8. % change in the number of female-specific development programmes supported by reintegration assistance to meet the needs of women and girls \\n 9. % change in the number of female participants in development programmes who receive reintegration assistance. \\n 10. % change in the number of communities with a high return rate of ex-combatants receiving reintegration assistance \\n 11. % change in the number of awareness campaigns on women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence supported by reintegration assistance \\n 12. Community perception of FXC, FS and FD \\n 13. Community perception of women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \n 1. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who vote or\/and stand for national and local elections in the concerned country \n 2. % change in the employment rate among FXC, FS and FD (in both formal and informal sectors) Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Women, Gender and DDR 37 5.10 \n 3. % change in the literacy rate among FXC, FS and FD, and their children \n 4. % change in disposable income among FXC, FS and FD, and their household \n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are the members of any type of association, including women\u2019s NGOs and ex-combatant support networks \n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are involved in the implementation\/management of community development programmes \n 7. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations that receive(d) reintegration assistance and implement development-related programme\/project(s) \n 8. % change in the number of female-specific development programmes supported by reintegration assistance to meet the needs of women and girls \n 9. % change in the number of female participants in development programmes who receive reintegration assistance. \n 10. % change in the number of communities with a high return rate of ex-combatants receiving reintegration assistance \n 11. % change in the number of awareness campaigns on women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence supported by reintegration assistance \n 12. Community perception of FXC, FS and FD \n 13. Community perception of women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129612,14 +129612,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.4. Gender-responsive evaluation of impact", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Community perception of FXC, FS and FD \\n 13.", + "Sentence": "Community perception of FXC, FS and FD \n 13.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator compared baseline data n 1 change number fxc f fd vote orand stand national local election concerned country n 2 change employment rate among fxc f fd formal informal sector level 5 crosscutting issue woman gender ddr 37 510 n 3 change literacy rate among fxc f fd child n 4 change disposable income among fxc f fd household n 5 change number fxc f fd member type association including woman ngo excombatant support network n 6 change number fxc f fd involved implementationmanagement community development programme n 7 change number woman organization received reintegration assistance implement developmentrelated programmeprojects n 8 change number femalespecific development programme supported reintegration assistance meet need woman girl n 9 change number female participant development programme receive reintegration assistance n 10 change number community high return rate excombatants receiving reintegration assistance n 11 change number awareness campaign woman human right genderbased violence supported reintegration assistance n 12 community perception fxc f fd n 13 community perception woman human right genderbased violence", "ProcessedSent": "community perception fxc f fd n 13", "SentID": 7200 }, { "ParagraphID": 2192, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \\n 1. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who vote or\/and stand for national and local elections in the concerned country \\n 2. % change in the employment rate among FXC, FS and FD (in both formal and informal sectors) Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Women, Gender and DDR 37 5.10 \\n 3. % change in the literacy rate among FXC, FS and FD, and their children \\n 4. % change in disposable income among FXC, FS and FD, and their household \\n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are the members of any type of association, including women\u2019s NGOs and ex-combatant support networks \\n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are involved in the implementation\/management of community development programmes \\n 7. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations that receive(d) reintegration assistance and implement development-related programme\/project(s) \\n 8. % change in the number of female-specific development programmes supported by reintegration assistance to meet the needs of women and girls \\n 9. % change in the number of female participants in development programmes who receive reintegration assistance. \\n 10. % change in the number of communities with a high return rate of ex-combatants receiving reintegration assistance \\n 11. % change in the number of awareness campaigns on women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence supported by reintegration assistance \\n 12. Community perception of FXC, FS and FD \\n 13. Community perception of women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS (COMPARED WITH THE BASELINE DATA) \n 1. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who vote or\/and stand for national and local elections in the concerned country \n 2. % change in the employment rate among FXC, FS and FD (in both formal and informal sectors) Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Women, Gender and DDR 37 5.10 \n 3. % change in the literacy rate among FXC, FS and FD, and their children \n 4. % change in disposable income among FXC, FS and FD, and their household \n 5. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are the members of any type of association, including women\u2019s NGOs and ex-combatant support networks \n 6. % change in the number of FXC, FS and FD who are involved in the implementation\/management of community development programmes \n 7. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations that receive(d) reintegration assistance and implement development-related programme\/project(s) \n 8. % change in the number of female-specific development programmes supported by reintegration assistance to meet the needs of women and girls \n 9. % change in the number of female participants in development programmes who receive reintegration assistance. \n 10. % change in the number of communities with a high return rate of ex-combatants receiving reintegration assistance \n 11. % change in the number of awareness campaigns on women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence supported by reintegration assistance \n 12. Community perception of FXC, FS and FD \n 13. Community perception of women\u2019s human rights and gender-based violence", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129637,7 +129637,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2193, - "Paragraph": "Purpose of evaluation: To examine the level of gender mainstreaming in the DDR budget; \\n Budget: Allocation of resources, balancing revenue and expenditure, cost efficiency; \\n Gender dimensions of budget: (1) Allocation of sufficient resources for female-specific interventions and gender-related interventions, such as gender training; (2) equal treat- ment of male and female ex-combatants in the overall programmes; (3) participation of women and women\u2019s NGOs in budgetary processes; \\n Data collection frequency: Every stage of the budget cycle (preparation, approval, appre- ciation, auditing, revision, reporting).", + "Paragraph": "Purpose of evaluation: To examine the level of gender mainstreaming in the DDR budget; \n Budget: Allocation of resources, balancing revenue and expenditure, cost efficiency; \n Gender dimensions of budget: (1) Allocation of sufficient resources for female-specific interventions and gender-related interventions, such as gender training; (2) equal treat- ment of male and female ex-combatants in the overall programmes; (3) participation of women and women\u2019s NGOs in budgetary processes; \n Data collection frequency: Every stage of the budget cycle (preparation, approval, appre- ciation, auditing, revision, reporting).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129648,14 +129648,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.5. Gender-responsive evaluation of budget (gender-responsive budgeting analysis)", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Purpose of evaluation: To examine the level of gender mainstreaming in the DDR budget; \\n Budget: Allocation of resources, balancing revenue and expenditure, cost efficiency; \\n Gender dimensions of budget: (1) Allocation of sufficient resources for female-specific interventions and gender-related interventions, such as gender training; (2) equal treat- ment of male and female ex-combatants in the overall programmes; (3) participation of women and women\u2019s NGOs in budgetary processes; \\n Data collection frequency: Every stage of the budget cycle (preparation, approval, appre- ciation, auditing, revision, reporting).", + "Sentence": "Purpose of evaluation: To examine the level of gender mainstreaming in the DDR budget; \n Budget: Allocation of resources, balancing revenue and expenditure, cost efficiency; \n Gender dimensions of budget: (1) Allocation of sufficient resources for female-specific interventions and gender-related interventions, such as gender training; (2) equal treat- ment of male and female ex-combatants in the overall programmes; (3) participation of women and women\u2019s NGOs in budgetary processes; \n Data collection frequency: Every stage of the budget cycle (preparation, approval, appre- ciation, auditing, revision, reporting).", "newParagraph": "purpose evaluation examine level gender mainstreaming ddr budget n budget allocation resource balancing revenue expenditure cost efficiency n gender dimension budget 1 allocation sufficient resource femalespecific intervention genderrelated intervention gender training 2 equal treat ment male female excombatants overall programme 3 participation woman woman ngo budgetary process n data collection frequency every stage budget cycle preparation approval appre ciation auditing revision reporting", "ProcessedSent": "purpose evaluation examine level gender mainstreaming ddr budget n budget allocation resource balancing revenue expenditure cost efficiency n gender dimension budget 1 allocation sufficient resource femalespecific intervention genderrelated intervention gender training 2 equal treat ment male female excombatants overall programme 3 participation woman woman ngo budgetary process n data collection frequency every stage budget cycle preparation approval appre ciation auditing revision reporting", "SentID": 7202 }, { "ParagraphID": 2194, - "Paragraph": "Key questions to ask: \\n To what extent did the budget specify female-specific and gender-related activities, their inputs, and the cost? \\n To what extent was the allocation of resources adequate to effectively implement female- specific and gender-specific activities? \\n To what extent did gender specialists\/advisers and women\u2019s organizations participate in the processes of the budget cycle (e.g., preparation, auditing)?", + "Paragraph": "Key questions to ask: \n To what extent did the budget specify female-specific and gender-related activities, their inputs, and the cost? \n To what extent was the allocation of resources adequate to effectively implement female- specific and gender-specific activities? \n To what extent did gender specialists\/advisers and women\u2019s organizations participate in the processes of the budget cycle (e.g., preparation, auditing)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129666,14 +129666,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.5. Gender-responsive evaluation of budget (gender-responsive budgeting analysis)", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Key questions to ask: \\n To what extent did the budget specify female-specific and gender-related activities, their inputs, and the cost?", + "Sentence": "Key questions to ask: \n To what extent did the budget specify female-specific and gender-related activities, their inputs, and the cost?", "newParagraph": "key question ask n extent budget specify femalespecific genderrelated activity input cost n extent allocation resource adequate effectively implement female specific genderspecific activity n extent gender specialistsadvisers woman organization participate process budget cycle eg preparation auditing", "ProcessedSent": "key question ask n extent budget specify femalespecific genderrelated activity input cost", "SentID": 7203 }, { "ParagraphID": 2194, - "Paragraph": "Key questions to ask: \\n To what extent did the budget specify female-specific and gender-related activities, their inputs, and the cost? \\n To what extent was the allocation of resources adequate to effectively implement female- specific and gender-specific activities? \\n To what extent did gender specialists\/advisers and women\u2019s organizations participate in the processes of the budget cycle (e.g., preparation, auditing)?", + "Paragraph": "Key questions to ask: \n To what extent did the budget specify female-specific and gender-related activities, their inputs, and the cost? \n To what extent was the allocation of resources adequate to effectively implement female- specific and gender-specific activities? \n To what extent did gender specialists\/advisers and women\u2019s organizations participate in the processes of the budget cycle (e.g., preparation, auditing)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129684,14 +129684,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.5. Gender-responsive evaluation of budget (gender-responsive budgeting analysis)", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n To what extent was the allocation of resources adequate to effectively implement female- specific and gender-specific activities?", + "Sentence": "\n To what extent was the allocation of resources adequate to effectively implement female- specific and gender-specific activities?", "newParagraph": "key question ask n extent budget specify femalespecific genderrelated activity input cost n extent allocation resource adequate effectively implement female specific genderspecific activity n extent gender specialistsadvisers woman organization participate process budget cycle eg preparation auditing", "ProcessedSent": "n extent allocation resource adequate effectively implement female specific genderspecific activity", "SentID": 7204 }, { "ParagraphID": 2194, - "Paragraph": "Key questions to ask: \\n To what extent did the budget specify female-specific and gender-related activities, their inputs, and the cost? \\n To what extent was the allocation of resources adequate to effectively implement female- specific and gender-specific activities? \\n To what extent did gender specialists\/advisers and women\u2019s organizations participate in the processes of the budget cycle (e.g., preparation, auditing)?", + "Paragraph": "Key questions to ask: \n To what extent did the budget specify female-specific and gender-related activities, their inputs, and the cost? \n To what extent was the allocation of resources adequate to effectively implement female- specific and gender-specific activities? \n To what extent did gender specialists\/advisers and women\u2019s organizations participate in the processes of the budget cycle (e.g., preparation, auditing)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129702,14 +129702,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.5. Gender-responsive evaluation of budget (gender-responsive budgeting analysis)", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n To what extent did gender specialists\/advisers and women\u2019s organizations participate in the processes of the budget cycle (e.g., preparation, auditing)?", + "Sentence": "\n To what extent did gender specialists\/advisers and women\u2019s organizations participate in the processes of the budget cycle (e.g., preparation, auditing)?", "newParagraph": "key question ask n extent budget specify femalespecific genderrelated activity input cost n extent allocation resource adequate effectively implement female specific genderspecific activity n extent gender specialistsadvisers woman organization participate process budget cycle eg preparation auditing", "ProcessedSent": "n extent gender specialistsadvisers woman organization participate process budget cycle eg preparation auditing", "SentID": 7205 }, { "ParagraphID": 2195, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. % of resource allocation for general activities \\n 2. % of resource allocation for female-specific activities \\n 3. % of resource allocation for gender-related activities (e.g., gender training) \\n 4. % of resource allocation for gender specialists and advisers (compared with other staff) \\n 5. Number of donors that specify the use of funds for female-specific activities and\/or gender training \\n 6. Unit cost of each activity for numbers 1\u20134 \\n 7. Unit cost of each input for each activity \\n 8. Duration of each activity \\n 9. % of activities that were successfully completed \\n 10. % of activities that could not be completed owing to lack of resources \\n 11. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers who participated in budget meetings at each stage of the budget cycle, including auditing \\n 12. Number of budget meetings attended by women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists \\n 13. % of budget revision on the advice of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. % of resource allocation for general activities \n 2. % of resource allocation for female-specific activities \n 3. % of resource allocation for gender-related activities (e.g., gender training) \n 4. % of resource allocation for gender specialists and advisers (compared with other staff) \n 5. Number of donors that specify the use of funds for female-specific activities and\/or gender training \n 6. Unit cost of each activity for numbers 1\u20134 \n 7. Unit cost of each input for each activity \n 8. Duration of each activity \n 9. % of activities that were successfully completed \n 10. % of activities that could not be completed owing to lack of resources \n 11. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers who participated in budget meetings at each stage of the budget cycle, including auditing \n 12. Number of budget meetings attended by women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists \n 13. % of budget revision on the advice of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129720,14 +129720,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.5. Gender-responsive evaluation of budget (gender-responsive budgeting analysis)", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1.", + "Sentence": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 resource allocation general activity n 2 resource allocation femalespecific activity n 3 resource allocation genderrelated activity eg gender training n 4 resource allocation gender specialist adviser compared staff n 5 number donor specify use fund femalespecific activity andor gender training n 6 unit cost activity number 1 4 n 7 unit cost input activity n 8 duration activity n 9 activity successfully completed n 10 activity could completed owing lack resource n 11 change number woman organization gender adviser participated budget meeting stage budget cycle including auditing n 12 number budget meeting attended woman organization gender advisersspecialists n 13 budget revision advice woman organization gender advisersspecialists", "ProcessedSent": "key measurable indicator n 1", "SentID": 7206 }, { "ParagraphID": 2195, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. % of resource allocation for general activities \\n 2. % of resource allocation for female-specific activities \\n 3. % of resource allocation for gender-related activities (e.g., gender training) \\n 4. % of resource allocation for gender specialists and advisers (compared with other staff) \\n 5. Number of donors that specify the use of funds for female-specific activities and\/or gender training \\n 6. Unit cost of each activity for numbers 1\u20134 \\n 7. Unit cost of each input for each activity \\n 8. Duration of each activity \\n 9. % of activities that were successfully completed \\n 10. % of activities that could not be completed owing to lack of resources \\n 11. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers who participated in budget meetings at each stage of the budget cycle, including auditing \\n 12. Number of budget meetings attended by women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists \\n 13. % of budget revision on the advice of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. % of resource allocation for general activities \n 2. % of resource allocation for female-specific activities \n 3. % of resource allocation for gender-related activities (e.g., gender training) \n 4. % of resource allocation for gender specialists and advisers (compared with other staff) \n 5. Number of donors that specify the use of funds for female-specific activities and\/or gender training \n 6. Unit cost of each activity for numbers 1\u20134 \n 7. Unit cost of each input for each activity \n 8. Duration of each activity \n 9. % of activities that were successfully completed \n 10. % of activities that could not be completed owing to lack of resources \n 11. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers who participated in budget meetings at each stage of the budget cycle, including auditing \n 12. Number of budget meetings attended by women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists \n 13. % of budget revision on the advice of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129738,14 +129738,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.5. Gender-responsive evaluation of budget (gender-responsive budgeting analysis)", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% of resource allocation for general activities \\n 2.", + "Sentence": "% of resource allocation for general activities \n 2.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 resource allocation general activity n 2 resource allocation femalespecific activity n 3 resource allocation genderrelated activity eg gender training n 4 resource allocation gender specialist adviser compared staff n 5 number donor specify use fund femalespecific activity andor gender training n 6 unit cost activity number 1 4 n 7 unit cost input activity n 8 duration activity n 9 activity successfully completed n 10 activity could completed owing lack resource n 11 change number woman organization gender adviser participated budget meeting stage budget cycle including auditing n 12 number budget meeting attended woman organization gender advisersspecialists n 13 budget revision advice woman organization gender advisersspecialists", "ProcessedSent": " resource allocation general activity n 2", "SentID": 7207 }, { "ParagraphID": 2195, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. % of resource allocation for general activities \\n 2. % of resource allocation for female-specific activities \\n 3. % of resource allocation for gender-related activities (e.g., gender training) \\n 4. % of resource allocation for gender specialists and advisers (compared with other staff) \\n 5. Number of donors that specify the use of funds for female-specific activities and\/or gender training \\n 6. Unit cost of each activity for numbers 1\u20134 \\n 7. Unit cost of each input for each activity \\n 8. Duration of each activity \\n 9. % of activities that were successfully completed \\n 10. % of activities that could not be completed owing to lack of resources \\n 11. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers who participated in budget meetings at each stage of the budget cycle, including auditing \\n 12. Number of budget meetings attended by women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists \\n 13. % of budget revision on the advice of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. % of resource allocation for general activities \n 2. % of resource allocation for female-specific activities \n 3. % of resource allocation for gender-related activities (e.g., gender training) \n 4. % of resource allocation for gender specialists and advisers (compared with other staff) \n 5. Number of donors that specify the use of funds for female-specific activities and\/or gender training \n 6. Unit cost of each activity for numbers 1\u20134 \n 7. Unit cost of each input for each activity \n 8. Duration of each activity \n 9. % of activities that were successfully completed \n 10. % of activities that could not be completed owing to lack of resources \n 11. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers who participated in budget meetings at each stage of the budget cycle, including auditing \n 12. Number of budget meetings attended by women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists \n 13. % of budget revision on the advice of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129756,14 +129756,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.5. Gender-responsive evaluation of budget (gender-responsive budgeting analysis)", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% of resource allocation for female-specific activities \\n 3.", + "Sentence": "% of resource allocation for female-specific activities \n 3.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 resource allocation general activity n 2 resource allocation femalespecific activity n 3 resource allocation genderrelated activity eg gender training n 4 resource allocation gender specialist adviser compared staff n 5 number donor specify use fund femalespecific activity andor gender training n 6 unit cost activity number 1 4 n 7 unit cost input activity n 8 duration activity n 9 activity successfully completed n 10 activity could completed owing lack resource n 11 change number woman organization gender adviser participated budget meeting stage budget cycle including auditing n 12 number budget meeting attended woman organization gender advisersspecialists n 13 budget revision advice woman organization gender advisersspecialists", "ProcessedSent": " resource allocation femalespecific activity n 3", "SentID": 7208 }, { "ParagraphID": 2195, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. % of resource allocation for general activities \\n 2. % of resource allocation for female-specific activities \\n 3. % of resource allocation for gender-related activities (e.g., gender training) \\n 4. % of resource allocation for gender specialists and advisers (compared with other staff) \\n 5. Number of donors that specify the use of funds for female-specific activities and\/or gender training \\n 6. Unit cost of each activity for numbers 1\u20134 \\n 7. Unit cost of each input for each activity \\n 8. Duration of each activity \\n 9. % of activities that were successfully completed \\n 10. % of activities that could not be completed owing to lack of resources \\n 11. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers who participated in budget meetings at each stage of the budget cycle, including auditing \\n 12. Number of budget meetings attended by women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists \\n 13. % of budget revision on the advice of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. % of resource allocation for general activities \n 2. % of resource allocation for female-specific activities \n 3. % of resource allocation for gender-related activities (e.g., gender training) \n 4. % of resource allocation for gender specialists and advisers (compared with other staff) \n 5. Number of donors that specify the use of funds for female-specific activities and\/or gender training \n 6. Unit cost of each activity for numbers 1\u20134 \n 7. Unit cost of each input for each activity \n 8. Duration of each activity \n 9. % of activities that were successfully completed \n 10. % of activities that could not be completed owing to lack of resources \n 11. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers who participated in budget meetings at each stage of the budget cycle, including auditing \n 12. Number of budget meetings attended by women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists \n 13. % of budget revision on the advice of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129774,14 +129774,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.5. Gender-responsive evaluation of budget (gender-responsive budgeting analysis)", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% of resource allocation for gender-related activities (e.g., gender training) \\n 4.", + "Sentence": "% of resource allocation for gender-related activities (e.g., gender training) \n 4.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 resource allocation general activity n 2 resource allocation femalespecific activity n 3 resource allocation genderrelated activity eg gender training n 4 resource allocation gender specialist adviser compared staff n 5 number donor specify use fund femalespecific activity andor gender training n 6 unit cost activity number 1 4 n 7 unit cost input activity n 8 duration activity n 9 activity successfully completed n 10 activity could completed owing lack resource n 11 change number woman organization gender adviser participated budget meeting stage budget cycle including auditing n 12 number budget meeting attended woman organization gender advisersspecialists n 13 budget revision advice woman organization gender advisersspecialists", "ProcessedSent": " resource allocation genderrelated activity eg gender training n 4", "SentID": 7209 }, { "ParagraphID": 2195, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. % of resource allocation for general activities \\n 2. % of resource allocation for female-specific activities \\n 3. % of resource allocation for gender-related activities (e.g., gender training) \\n 4. % of resource allocation for gender specialists and advisers (compared with other staff) \\n 5. Number of donors that specify the use of funds for female-specific activities and\/or gender training \\n 6. Unit cost of each activity for numbers 1\u20134 \\n 7. Unit cost of each input for each activity \\n 8. Duration of each activity \\n 9. % of activities that were successfully completed \\n 10. % of activities that could not be completed owing to lack of resources \\n 11. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers who participated in budget meetings at each stage of the budget cycle, including auditing \\n 12. Number of budget meetings attended by women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists \\n 13. % of budget revision on the advice of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. % of resource allocation for general activities \n 2. % of resource allocation for female-specific activities \n 3. % of resource allocation for gender-related activities (e.g., gender training) \n 4. % of resource allocation for gender specialists and advisers (compared with other staff) \n 5. Number of donors that specify the use of funds for female-specific activities and\/or gender training \n 6. Unit cost of each activity for numbers 1\u20134 \n 7. Unit cost of each input for each activity \n 8. Duration of each activity \n 9. % of activities that were successfully completed \n 10. % of activities that could not be completed owing to lack of resources \n 11. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers who participated in budget meetings at each stage of the budget cycle, including auditing \n 12. Number of budget meetings attended by women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists \n 13. % of budget revision on the advice of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129792,14 +129792,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.5. Gender-responsive evaluation of budget (gender-responsive budgeting analysis)", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% of resource allocation for gender specialists and advisers (compared with other staff) \\n 5.", + "Sentence": "% of resource allocation for gender specialists and advisers (compared with other staff) \n 5.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 resource allocation general activity n 2 resource allocation femalespecific activity n 3 resource allocation genderrelated activity eg gender training n 4 resource allocation gender specialist adviser compared staff n 5 number donor specify use fund femalespecific activity andor gender training n 6 unit cost activity number 1 4 n 7 unit cost input activity n 8 duration activity n 9 activity successfully completed n 10 activity could completed owing lack resource n 11 change number woman organization gender adviser participated budget meeting stage budget cycle including auditing n 12 number budget meeting attended woman organization gender advisersspecialists n 13 budget revision advice woman organization gender advisersspecialists", "ProcessedSent": " resource allocation gender specialist adviser compared staff n 5", "SentID": 7210 }, { "ParagraphID": 2195, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. % of resource allocation for general activities \\n 2. % of resource allocation for female-specific activities \\n 3. % of resource allocation for gender-related activities (e.g., gender training) \\n 4. % of resource allocation for gender specialists and advisers (compared with other staff) \\n 5. Number of donors that specify the use of funds for female-specific activities and\/or gender training \\n 6. Unit cost of each activity for numbers 1\u20134 \\n 7. Unit cost of each input for each activity \\n 8. Duration of each activity \\n 9. % of activities that were successfully completed \\n 10. % of activities that could not be completed owing to lack of resources \\n 11. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers who participated in budget meetings at each stage of the budget cycle, including auditing \\n 12. Number of budget meetings attended by women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists \\n 13. % of budget revision on the advice of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. % of resource allocation for general activities \n 2. % of resource allocation for female-specific activities \n 3. % of resource allocation for gender-related activities (e.g., gender training) \n 4. % of resource allocation for gender specialists and advisers (compared with other staff) \n 5. Number of donors that specify the use of funds for female-specific activities and\/or gender training \n 6. Unit cost of each activity for numbers 1\u20134 \n 7. Unit cost of each input for each activity \n 8. Duration of each activity \n 9. % of activities that were successfully completed \n 10. % of activities that could not be completed owing to lack of resources \n 11. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers who participated in budget meetings at each stage of the budget cycle, including auditing \n 12. Number of budget meetings attended by women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists \n 13. % of budget revision on the advice of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129810,14 +129810,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.5. Gender-responsive evaluation of budget (gender-responsive budgeting analysis)", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Number of donors that specify the use of funds for female-specific activities and\/or gender training \\n 6.", + "Sentence": "Number of donors that specify the use of funds for female-specific activities and\/or gender training \n 6.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 resource allocation general activity n 2 resource allocation femalespecific activity n 3 resource allocation genderrelated activity eg gender training n 4 resource allocation gender specialist adviser compared staff n 5 number donor specify use fund femalespecific activity andor gender training n 6 unit cost activity number 1 4 n 7 unit cost input activity n 8 duration activity n 9 activity successfully completed n 10 activity could completed owing lack resource n 11 change number woman organization gender adviser participated budget meeting stage budget cycle including auditing n 12 number budget meeting attended woman organization gender advisersspecialists n 13 budget revision advice woman organization gender advisersspecialists", "ProcessedSent": "number donor specify use fund femalespecific activity andor gender training n 6", "SentID": 7211 }, { "ParagraphID": 2195, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. % of resource allocation for general activities \\n 2. % of resource allocation for female-specific activities \\n 3. % of resource allocation for gender-related activities (e.g., gender training) \\n 4. % of resource allocation for gender specialists and advisers (compared with other staff) \\n 5. Number of donors that specify the use of funds for female-specific activities and\/or gender training \\n 6. Unit cost of each activity for numbers 1\u20134 \\n 7. Unit cost of each input for each activity \\n 8. Duration of each activity \\n 9. % of activities that were successfully completed \\n 10. % of activities that could not be completed owing to lack of resources \\n 11. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers who participated in budget meetings at each stage of the budget cycle, including auditing \\n 12. Number of budget meetings attended by women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists \\n 13. % of budget revision on the advice of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. % of resource allocation for general activities \n 2. % of resource allocation for female-specific activities \n 3. % of resource allocation for gender-related activities (e.g., gender training) \n 4. % of resource allocation for gender specialists and advisers (compared with other staff) \n 5. Number of donors that specify the use of funds for female-specific activities and\/or gender training \n 6. Unit cost of each activity for numbers 1\u20134 \n 7. Unit cost of each input for each activity \n 8. Duration of each activity \n 9. % of activities that were successfully completed \n 10. % of activities that could not be completed owing to lack of resources \n 11. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers who participated in budget meetings at each stage of the budget cycle, including auditing \n 12. Number of budget meetings attended by women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists \n 13. % of budget revision on the advice of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129828,14 +129828,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.5. Gender-responsive evaluation of budget (gender-responsive budgeting analysis)", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Unit cost of each activity for numbers 1\u20134 \\n 7.", + "Sentence": "Unit cost of each activity for numbers 1\u20134 \n 7.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 resource allocation general activity n 2 resource allocation femalespecific activity n 3 resource allocation genderrelated activity eg gender training n 4 resource allocation gender specialist adviser compared staff n 5 number donor specify use fund femalespecific activity andor gender training n 6 unit cost activity number 1 4 n 7 unit cost input activity n 8 duration activity n 9 activity successfully completed n 10 activity could completed owing lack resource n 11 change number woman organization gender adviser participated budget meeting stage budget cycle including auditing n 12 number budget meeting attended woman organization gender advisersspecialists n 13 budget revision advice woman organization gender advisersspecialists", "ProcessedSent": "unit cost activity number 1 4 n 7", "SentID": 7212 }, { "ParagraphID": 2195, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. % of resource allocation for general activities \\n 2. % of resource allocation for female-specific activities \\n 3. % of resource allocation for gender-related activities (e.g., gender training) \\n 4. % of resource allocation for gender specialists and advisers (compared with other staff) \\n 5. Number of donors that specify the use of funds for female-specific activities and\/or gender training \\n 6. Unit cost of each activity for numbers 1\u20134 \\n 7. Unit cost of each input for each activity \\n 8. Duration of each activity \\n 9. % of activities that were successfully completed \\n 10. % of activities that could not be completed owing to lack of resources \\n 11. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers who participated in budget meetings at each stage of the budget cycle, including auditing \\n 12. Number of budget meetings attended by women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists \\n 13. % of budget revision on the advice of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. % of resource allocation for general activities \n 2. % of resource allocation for female-specific activities \n 3. % of resource allocation for gender-related activities (e.g., gender training) \n 4. % of resource allocation for gender specialists and advisers (compared with other staff) \n 5. Number of donors that specify the use of funds for female-specific activities and\/or gender training \n 6. Unit cost of each activity for numbers 1\u20134 \n 7. Unit cost of each input for each activity \n 8. Duration of each activity \n 9. % of activities that were successfully completed \n 10. % of activities that could not be completed owing to lack of resources \n 11. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers who participated in budget meetings at each stage of the budget cycle, including auditing \n 12. Number of budget meetings attended by women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists \n 13. % of budget revision on the advice of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129846,14 +129846,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.5. Gender-responsive evaluation of budget (gender-responsive budgeting analysis)", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Unit cost of each input for each activity \\n 8.", + "Sentence": "Unit cost of each input for each activity \n 8.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 resource allocation general activity n 2 resource allocation femalespecific activity n 3 resource allocation genderrelated activity eg gender training n 4 resource allocation gender specialist adviser compared staff n 5 number donor specify use fund femalespecific activity andor gender training n 6 unit cost activity number 1 4 n 7 unit cost input activity n 8 duration activity n 9 activity successfully completed n 10 activity could completed owing lack resource n 11 change number woman organization gender adviser participated budget meeting stage budget cycle including auditing n 12 number budget meeting attended woman organization gender advisersspecialists n 13 budget revision advice woman organization gender advisersspecialists", "ProcessedSent": "unit cost input activity n 8", "SentID": 7213 }, { "ParagraphID": 2195, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. % of resource allocation for general activities \\n 2. % of resource allocation for female-specific activities \\n 3. % of resource allocation for gender-related activities (e.g., gender training) \\n 4. % of resource allocation for gender specialists and advisers (compared with other staff) \\n 5. Number of donors that specify the use of funds for female-specific activities and\/or gender training \\n 6. Unit cost of each activity for numbers 1\u20134 \\n 7. Unit cost of each input for each activity \\n 8. Duration of each activity \\n 9. % of activities that were successfully completed \\n 10. % of activities that could not be completed owing to lack of resources \\n 11. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers who participated in budget meetings at each stage of the budget cycle, including auditing \\n 12. Number of budget meetings attended by women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists \\n 13. % of budget revision on the advice of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. % of resource allocation for general activities \n 2. % of resource allocation for female-specific activities \n 3. % of resource allocation for gender-related activities (e.g., gender training) \n 4. % of resource allocation for gender specialists and advisers (compared with other staff) \n 5. Number of donors that specify the use of funds for female-specific activities and\/or gender training \n 6. Unit cost of each activity for numbers 1\u20134 \n 7. Unit cost of each input for each activity \n 8. Duration of each activity \n 9. % of activities that were successfully completed \n 10. % of activities that could not be completed owing to lack of resources \n 11. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers who participated in budget meetings at each stage of the budget cycle, including auditing \n 12. Number of budget meetings attended by women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists \n 13. % of budget revision on the advice of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129864,14 +129864,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.5. Gender-responsive evaluation of budget (gender-responsive budgeting analysis)", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Duration of each activity \\n 9.", + "Sentence": "Duration of each activity \n 9.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 resource allocation general activity n 2 resource allocation femalespecific activity n 3 resource allocation genderrelated activity eg gender training n 4 resource allocation gender specialist adviser compared staff n 5 number donor specify use fund femalespecific activity andor gender training n 6 unit cost activity number 1 4 n 7 unit cost input activity n 8 duration activity n 9 activity successfully completed n 10 activity could completed owing lack resource n 11 change number woman organization gender adviser participated budget meeting stage budget cycle including auditing n 12 number budget meeting attended woman organization gender advisersspecialists n 13 budget revision advice woman organization gender advisersspecialists", "ProcessedSent": "duration activity n 9", "SentID": 7214 }, { "ParagraphID": 2195, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. % of resource allocation for general activities \\n 2. % of resource allocation for female-specific activities \\n 3. % of resource allocation for gender-related activities (e.g., gender training) \\n 4. % of resource allocation for gender specialists and advisers (compared with other staff) \\n 5. Number of donors that specify the use of funds for female-specific activities and\/or gender training \\n 6. Unit cost of each activity for numbers 1\u20134 \\n 7. Unit cost of each input for each activity \\n 8. Duration of each activity \\n 9. % of activities that were successfully completed \\n 10. % of activities that could not be completed owing to lack of resources \\n 11. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers who participated in budget meetings at each stage of the budget cycle, including auditing \\n 12. Number of budget meetings attended by women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists \\n 13. % of budget revision on the advice of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. % of resource allocation for general activities \n 2. % of resource allocation for female-specific activities \n 3. % of resource allocation for gender-related activities (e.g., gender training) \n 4. % of resource allocation for gender specialists and advisers (compared with other staff) \n 5. Number of donors that specify the use of funds for female-specific activities and\/or gender training \n 6. Unit cost of each activity for numbers 1\u20134 \n 7. Unit cost of each input for each activity \n 8. Duration of each activity \n 9. % of activities that were successfully completed \n 10. % of activities that could not be completed owing to lack of resources \n 11. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers who participated in budget meetings at each stage of the budget cycle, including auditing \n 12. Number of budget meetings attended by women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists \n 13. % of budget revision on the advice of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129882,14 +129882,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.5. Gender-responsive evaluation of budget (gender-responsive budgeting analysis)", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% of activities that were successfully completed \\n 10.", + "Sentence": "% of activities that were successfully completed \n 10.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 resource allocation general activity n 2 resource allocation femalespecific activity n 3 resource allocation genderrelated activity eg gender training n 4 resource allocation gender specialist adviser compared staff n 5 number donor specify use fund femalespecific activity andor gender training n 6 unit cost activity number 1 4 n 7 unit cost input activity n 8 duration activity n 9 activity successfully completed n 10 activity could completed owing lack resource n 11 change number woman organization gender adviser participated budget meeting stage budget cycle including auditing n 12 number budget meeting attended woman organization gender advisersspecialists n 13 budget revision advice woman organization gender advisersspecialists", "ProcessedSent": " activity successfully completed n 10", "SentID": 7215 }, { "ParagraphID": 2195, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. % of resource allocation for general activities \\n 2. % of resource allocation for female-specific activities \\n 3. % of resource allocation for gender-related activities (e.g., gender training) \\n 4. % of resource allocation for gender specialists and advisers (compared with other staff) \\n 5. Number of donors that specify the use of funds for female-specific activities and\/or gender training \\n 6. Unit cost of each activity for numbers 1\u20134 \\n 7. Unit cost of each input for each activity \\n 8. Duration of each activity \\n 9. % of activities that were successfully completed \\n 10. % of activities that could not be completed owing to lack of resources \\n 11. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers who participated in budget meetings at each stage of the budget cycle, including auditing \\n 12. Number of budget meetings attended by women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists \\n 13. % of budget revision on the advice of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. % of resource allocation for general activities \n 2. % of resource allocation for female-specific activities \n 3. % of resource allocation for gender-related activities (e.g., gender training) \n 4. % of resource allocation for gender specialists and advisers (compared with other staff) \n 5. Number of donors that specify the use of funds for female-specific activities and\/or gender training \n 6. Unit cost of each activity for numbers 1\u20134 \n 7. Unit cost of each input for each activity \n 8. Duration of each activity \n 9. % of activities that were successfully completed \n 10. % of activities that could not be completed owing to lack of resources \n 11. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers who participated in budget meetings at each stage of the budget cycle, including auditing \n 12. Number of budget meetings attended by women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists \n 13. % of budget revision on the advice of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129900,14 +129900,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.5. Gender-responsive evaluation of budget (gender-responsive budgeting analysis)", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% of activities that could not be completed owing to lack of resources \\n 11.", + "Sentence": "% of activities that could not be completed owing to lack of resources \n 11.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 resource allocation general activity n 2 resource allocation femalespecific activity n 3 resource allocation genderrelated activity eg gender training n 4 resource allocation gender specialist adviser compared staff n 5 number donor specify use fund femalespecific activity andor gender training n 6 unit cost activity number 1 4 n 7 unit cost input activity n 8 duration activity n 9 activity successfully completed n 10 activity could completed owing lack resource n 11 change number woman organization gender adviser participated budget meeting stage budget cycle including auditing n 12 number budget meeting attended woman organization gender advisersspecialists n 13 budget revision advice woman organization gender advisersspecialists", "ProcessedSent": " activity could completed owing lack resource n 11", "SentID": 7216 }, { "ParagraphID": 2195, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. % of resource allocation for general activities \\n 2. % of resource allocation for female-specific activities \\n 3. % of resource allocation for gender-related activities (e.g., gender training) \\n 4. % of resource allocation for gender specialists and advisers (compared with other staff) \\n 5. Number of donors that specify the use of funds for female-specific activities and\/or gender training \\n 6. Unit cost of each activity for numbers 1\u20134 \\n 7. Unit cost of each input for each activity \\n 8. Duration of each activity \\n 9. % of activities that were successfully completed \\n 10. % of activities that could not be completed owing to lack of resources \\n 11. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers who participated in budget meetings at each stage of the budget cycle, including auditing \\n 12. Number of budget meetings attended by women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists \\n 13. % of budget revision on the advice of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. % of resource allocation for general activities \n 2. % of resource allocation for female-specific activities \n 3. % of resource allocation for gender-related activities (e.g., gender training) \n 4. % of resource allocation for gender specialists and advisers (compared with other staff) \n 5. Number of donors that specify the use of funds for female-specific activities and\/or gender training \n 6. Unit cost of each activity for numbers 1\u20134 \n 7. Unit cost of each input for each activity \n 8. Duration of each activity \n 9. % of activities that were successfully completed \n 10. % of activities that could not be completed owing to lack of resources \n 11. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers who participated in budget meetings at each stage of the budget cycle, including auditing \n 12. Number of budget meetings attended by women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists \n 13. % of budget revision on the advice of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129918,14 +129918,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.5. Gender-responsive evaluation of budget (gender-responsive budgeting analysis)", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% change in the number of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers who participated in budget meetings at each stage of the budget cycle, including auditing \\n 12.", + "Sentence": "% change in the number of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers who participated in budget meetings at each stage of the budget cycle, including auditing \n 12.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 resource allocation general activity n 2 resource allocation femalespecific activity n 3 resource allocation genderrelated activity eg gender training n 4 resource allocation gender specialist adviser compared staff n 5 number donor specify use fund femalespecific activity andor gender training n 6 unit cost activity number 1 4 n 7 unit cost input activity n 8 duration activity n 9 activity successfully completed n 10 activity could completed owing lack resource n 11 change number woman organization gender adviser participated budget meeting stage budget cycle including auditing n 12 number budget meeting attended woman organization gender advisersspecialists n 13 budget revision advice woman organization gender advisersspecialists", "ProcessedSent": " change number woman organization gender adviser participated budget meeting stage budget cycle including auditing n 12", "SentID": 7217 }, { "ParagraphID": 2195, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. % of resource allocation for general activities \\n 2. % of resource allocation for female-specific activities \\n 3. % of resource allocation for gender-related activities (e.g., gender training) \\n 4. % of resource allocation for gender specialists and advisers (compared with other staff) \\n 5. Number of donors that specify the use of funds for female-specific activities and\/or gender training \\n 6. Unit cost of each activity for numbers 1\u20134 \\n 7. Unit cost of each input for each activity \\n 8. Duration of each activity \\n 9. % of activities that were successfully completed \\n 10. % of activities that could not be completed owing to lack of resources \\n 11. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers who participated in budget meetings at each stage of the budget cycle, including auditing \\n 12. Number of budget meetings attended by women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists \\n 13. % of budget revision on the advice of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. % of resource allocation for general activities \n 2. % of resource allocation for female-specific activities \n 3. % of resource allocation for gender-related activities (e.g., gender training) \n 4. % of resource allocation for gender specialists and advisers (compared with other staff) \n 5. Number of donors that specify the use of funds for female-specific activities and\/or gender training \n 6. Unit cost of each activity for numbers 1\u20134 \n 7. Unit cost of each input for each activity \n 8. Duration of each activity \n 9. % of activities that were successfully completed \n 10. % of activities that could not be completed owing to lack of resources \n 11. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers who participated in budget meetings at each stage of the budget cycle, including auditing \n 12. Number of budget meetings attended by women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists \n 13. % of budget revision on the advice of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129936,14 +129936,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.5. Gender-responsive evaluation of budget (gender-responsive budgeting analysis)", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Number of budget meetings attended by women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists \\n 13.", + "Sentence": "Number of budget meetings attended by women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists \n 13.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 resource allocation general activity n 2 resource allocation femalespecific activity n 3 resource allocation genderrelated activity eg gender training n 4 resource allocation gender specialist adviser compared staff n 5 number donor specify use fund femalespecific activity andor gender training n 6 unit cost activity number 1 4 n 7 unit cost input activity n 8 duration activity n 9 activity successfully completed n 10 activity could completed owing lack resource n 11 change number woman organization gender adviser participated budget meeting stage budget cycle including auditing n 12 number budget meeting attended woman organization gender advisersspecialists n 13 budget revision advice woman organization gender advisersspecialists", "ProcessedSent": "number budget meeting attended woman organization gender advisersspecialists n 13", "SentID": 7218 }, { "ParagraphID": 2195, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. % of resource allocation for general activities \\n 2. % of resource allocation for female-specific activities \\n 3. % of resource allocation for gender-related activities (e.g., gender training) \\n 4. % of resource allocation for gender specialists and advisers (compared with other staff) \\n 5. Number of donors that specify the use of funds for female-specific activities and\/or gender training \\n 6. Unit cost of each activity for numbers 1\u20134 \\n 7. Unit cost of each input for each activity \\n 8. Duration of each activity \\n 9. % of activities that were successfully completed \\n 10. % of activities that could not be completed owing to lack of resources \\n 11. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers who participated in budget meetings at each stage of the budget cycle, including auditing \\n 12. Number of budget meetings attended by women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists \\n 13. % of budget revision on the advice of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. % of resource allocation for general activities \n 2. % of resource allocation for female-specific activities \n 3. % of resource allocation for gender-related activities (e.g., gender training) \n 4. % of resource allocation for gender specialists and advisers (compared with other staff) \n 5. Number of donors that specify the use of funds for female-specific activities and\/or gender training \n 6. Unit cost of each activity for numbers 1\u20134 \n 7. Unit cost of each input for each activity \n 8. Duration of each activity \n 9. % of activities that were successfully completed \n 10. % of activities that could not be completed owing to lack of resources \n 11. % change in the number of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers who participated in budget meetings at each stage of the budget cycle, including auditing \n 12. Number of budget meetings attended by women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists \n 13. % of budget revision on the advice of women\u2019s organizations and gender advisers\/specialists", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129961,7 +129961,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2196, - "Paragraph": "Purpose of evaluation: To examine the level of gender mainstreaming in each DDR programme\/project cycle and its management; \\n Programme\/Project cycle: (1) Situational analysis and need assessment; (2) project design; (3) project appraisal; (4) secure funding; (5) project implementation; (6) M&E; \\n Gender dimensions of project cycle: (1) Assessment of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 participation; (2) gender-responsive project design and M&E; (3) understanding and implementation of gender mainstreaming among programme staff; \\n Data collection frequency: Every month during the implementation of the programme, and before and after the implementation of the programme.", + "Paragraph": "Purpose of evaluation: To examine the level of gender mainstreaming in each DDR programme\/project cycle and its management; \n Programme\/Project cycle: (1) Situational analysis and need assessment; (2) project design; (3) project appraisal; (4) secure funding; (5) project implementation; (6) M&E; \n Gender dimensions of project cycle: (1) Assessment of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 participation; (2) gender-responsive project design and M&E; (3) understanding and implementation of gender mainstreaming among programme staff; \n Data collection frequency: Every month during the implementation of the programme, and before and after the implementation of the programme.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129972,14 +129972,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.6. Evaluation to assess the level of gender mainstreaming in programme management", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Purpose of evaluation: To examine the level of gender mainstreaming in each DDR programme\/project cycle and its management; \\n Programme\/Project cycle: (1) Situational analysis and need assessment; (2) project design; (3) project appraisal; (4) secure funding; (5) project implementation; (6) M&E; \\n Gender dimensions of project cycle: (1) Assessment of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 participation; (2) gender-responsive project design and M&E; (3) understanding and implementation of gender mainstreaming among programme staff; \\n Data collection frequency: Every month during the implementation of the programme, and before and after the implementation of the programme.", + "Sentence": "Purpose of evaluation: To examine the level of gender mainstreaming in each DDR programme\/project cycle and its management; \n Programme\/Project cycle: (1) Situational analysis and need assessment; (2) project design; (3) project appraisal; (4) secure funding; (5) project implementation; (6) M&E; \n Gender dimensions of project cycle: (1) Assessment of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 participation; (2) gender-responsive project design and M&E; (3) understanding and implementation of gender mainstreaming among programme staff; \n Data collection frequency: Every month during the implementation of the programme, and before and after the implementation of the programme.", "newParagraph": "purpose evaluation examine level gender mainstreaming ddr programmeproject cycle management n programmeproject cycle 1 situational analysis need assessment 2 project design 3 project appraisal 4 secure funding 5 project implementation 6 n gender dimension project cycle 1 assessment woman girl participation 2 genderresponsive project design 3 understanding implementation gender mainstreaming among programme staff n data collection frequency every month implementation programme implementation programme", "ProcessedSent": "purpose evaluation examine level gender mainstreaming ddr programmeproject cycle management n programmeproject cycle 1 situational analysis need assessment 2 project design 3 project appraisal 4 secure funding 5 project implementation 6 n gender dimension project cycle 1 assessment woman girl participation 2 genderresponsive project design 3 understanding implementation gender mainstreaming among programme staff n data collection frequency every month implementation programme implementation programme", "SentID": 7220 }, { "ParagraphID": 2197, - "Paragraph": "Key question to ask: \\n To what extent was gender mainstreamed in the DDR programme management and its project cycle?", + "Paragraph": "Key question to ask: \n To what extent was gender mainstreamed in the DDR programme management and its project cycle?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -129990,14 +129990,14 @@ "Heading2": "4. Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation", "Heading3": "4.6. Evaluation to assess the level of gender mainstreaming in programme management", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Key question to ask: \\n To what extent was gender mainstreamed in the DDR programme management and its project cycle?", + "Sentence": "Key question to ask: \n To what extent was gender mainstreamed in the DDR programme management and its project cycle?", "newParagraph": "key question ask n extent gender mainstreamed ddr programme management project cycle", "ProcessedSent": "key question ask n extent gender mainstreamed ddr programme management project cycle", "SentID": 7221 }, { "ParagraphID": 2198, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. % of staff who have participated in gender training \\n 2. % of staff who have used gender analysis framework in needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \\n 3. % of staff who have interviewed girls and women for needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \\n 4. % of staff who have worked with local women\u2019s organizations \\n 5. % of staff who are in charge of female-specific interventions and\/or gender training \\n 6. % of the programme meetings attended by local women\u2019s organizations and female community leaders \\n 7. % of staff who have carried out gender analysis of the DDR programme budget \\n 8. % of indicators and data disaggregated by gender \\n 9. % of indicators and data that reflects female specific status and\/or issues \\n 10. Number of gender trainings conducted for DDR programme staff \\n 11. % of staff who are familiar with Security Council resolution 1325 \\n 12. % of staff who are familiar with gender issues associated with conflicts (e.g. gender-based violence, human trafficking) \\n 13. % of training specifically aimed at understanding gender issues and use of gender analysis frame\u00adworks for those who conduct M&E \\n 14. distribution of guidelines or manual for gender analysis and gender mainstreaming for DDR programme management", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. % of staff who have participated in gender training \n 2. % of staff who have used gender analysis framework in needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \n 3. % of staff who have interviewed girls and women for needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \n 4. % of staff who have worked with local women\u2019s organizations \n 5. % of staff who are in charge of female-specific interventions and\/or gender training \n 6. % of the programme meetings attended by local women\u2019s organizations and female community leaders \n 7. % of staff who have carried out gender analysis of the DDR programme budget \n 8. % of indicators and data disaggregated by gender \n 9. % of indicators and data that reflects female specific status and\/or issues \n 10. Number of gender trainings conducted for DDR programme staff \n 11. % of staff who are familiar with Security Council resolution 1325 \n 12. % of staff who are familiar with gender issues associated with conflicts (e.g. gender-based violence, human trafficking) \n 13. % of training specifically aimed at understanding gender issues and use of gender analysis frame\u00adworks for those who conduct M&E \n 14. distribution of guidelines or manual for gender analysis and gender mainstreaming for DDR programme management", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130008,14 +130008,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1.", + "Sentence": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 staff participated gender training n 2 staff used gender analysis framework need assessment situational analysis orand evaluation n 3 staff interviewed girl woman need assessment situational analysis orand evaluation n 4 staff worked local woman organization n 5 staff charge femalespecific intervention andor gender training n 6 programme meeting attended local woman organization female community leader n 7 staff carried gender analysis ddr programme budget n 8 indicator data disaggregated gender n 9 indicator data reflects female specific status andor issue n 10 number gender training conducted ddr programme staff n 11 staff familiar security council resolution 1325 n 12 staff familiar gender issue associated conflict eg genderbased violence human trafficking n 13 training specifically aimed understanding gender issue use gender analysis frame work conduct n 14 distribution guideline manual gender analysis gender mainstreaming ddr programme management", "ProcessedSent": "key measurable indicator n 1", "SentID": 7222 }, { "ParagraphID": 2198, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. % of staff who have participated in gender training \\n 2. % of staff who have used gender analysis framework in needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \\n 3. % of staff who have interviewed girls and women for needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \\n 4. % of staff who have worked with local women\u2019s organizations \\n 5. % of staff who are in charge of female-specific interventions and\/or gender training \\n 6. % of the programme meetings attended by local women\u2019s organizations and female community leaders \\n 7. % of staff who have carried out gender analysis of the DDR programme budget \\n 8. % of indicators and data disaggregated by gender \\n 9. % of indicators and data that reflects female specific status and\/or issues \\n 10. Number of gender trainings conducted for DDR programme staff \\n 11. % of staff who are familiar with Security Council resolution 1325 \\n 12. % of staff who are familiar with gender issues associated with conflicts (e.g. gender-based violence, human trafficking) \\n 13. % of training specifically aimed at understanding gender issues and use of gender analysis frame\u00adworks for those who conduct M&E \\n 14. distribution of guidelines or manual for gender analysis and gender mainstreaming for DDR programme management", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. % of staff who have participated in gender training \n 2. % of staff who have used gender analysis framework in needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \n 3. % of staff who have interviewed girls and women for needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \n 4. % of staff who have worked with local women\u2019s organizations \n 5. % of staff who are in charge of female-specific interventions and\/or gender training \n 6. % of the programme meetings attended by local women\u2019s organizations and female community leaders \n 7. % of staff who have carried out gender analysis of the DDR programme budget \n 8. % of indicators and data disaggregated by gender \n 9. % of indicators and data that reflects female specific status and\/or issues \n 10. Number of gender trainings conducted for DDR programme staff \n 11. % of staff who are familiar with Security Council resolution 1325 \n 12. % of staff who are familiar with gender issues associated with conflicts (e.g. gender-based violence, human trafficking) \n 13. % of training specifically aimed at understanding gender issues and use of gender analysis frame\u00adworks for those who conduct M&E \n 14. distribution of guidelines or manual for gender analysis and gender mainstreaming for DDR programme management", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130026,14 +130026,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% of staff who have participated in gender training \\n 2.", + "Sentence": "% of staff who have participated in gender training \n 2.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 staff participated gender training n 2 staff used gender analysis framework need assessment situational analysis orand evaluation n 3 staff interviewed girl woman need assessment situational analysis orand evaluation n 4 staff worked local woman organization n 5 staff charge femalespecific intervention andor gender training n 6 programme meeting attended local woman organization female community leader n 7 staff carried gender analysis ddr programme budget n 8 indicator data disaggregated gender n 9 indicator data reflects female specific status andor issue n 10 number gender training conducted ddr programme staff n 11 staff familiar security council resolution 1325 n 12 staff familiar gender issue associated conflict eg genderbased violence human trafficking n 13 training specifically aimed understanding gender issue use gender analysis frame work conduct n 14 distribution guideline manual gender analysis gender mainstreaming ddr programme management", "ProcessedSent": " staff participated gender training n 2", "SentID": 7223 }, { "ParagraphID": 2198, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. % of staff who have participated in gender training \\n 2. % of staff who have used gender analysis framework in needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \\n 3. % of staff who have interviewed girls and women for needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \\n 4. % of staff who have worked with local women\u2019s organizations \\n 5. % of staff who are in charge of female-specific interventions and\/or gender training \\n 6. % of the programme meetings attended by local women\u2019s organizations and female community leaders \\n 7. % of staff who have carried out gender analysis of the DDR programme budget \\n 8. % of indicators and data disaggregated by gender \\n 9. % of indicators and data that reflects female specific status and\/or issues \\n 10. Number of gender trainings conducted for DDR programme staff \\n 11. % of staff who are familiar with Security Council resolution 1325 \\n 12. % of staff who are familiar with gender issues associated with conflicts (e.g. gender-based violence, human trafficking) \\n 13. % of training specifically aimed at understanding gender issues and use of gender analysis frame\u00adworks for those who conduct M&E \\n 14. distribution of guidelines or manual for gender analysis and gender mainstreaming for DDR programme management", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. % of staff who have participated in gender training \n 2. % of staff who have used gender analysis framework in needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \n 3. % of staff who have interviewed girls and women for needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \n 4. % of staff who have worked with local women\u2019s organizations \n 5. % of staff who are in charge of female-specific interventions and\/or gender training \n 6. % of the programme meetings attended by local women\u2019s organizations and female community leaders \n 7. % of staff who have carried out gender analysis of the DDR programme budget \n 8. % of indicators and data disaggregated by gender \n 9. % of indicators and data that reflects female specific status and\/or issues \n 10. Number of gender trainings conducted for DDR programme staff \n 11. % of staff who are familiar with Security Council resolution 1325 \n 12. % of staff who are familiar with gender issues associated with conflicts (e.g. gender-based violence, human trafficking) \n 13. % of training specifically aimed at understanding gender issues and use of gender analysis frame\u00adworks for those who conduct M&E \n 14. distribution of guidelines or manual for gender analysis and gender mainstreaming for DDR programme management", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130044,14 +130044,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% of staff who have used gender analysis framework in needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \\n 3.", + "Sentence": "% of staff who have used gender analysis framework in needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \n 3.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 staff participated gender training n 2 staff used gender analysis framework need assessment situational analysis orand evaluation n 3 staff interviewed girl woman need assessment situational analysis orand evaluation n 4 staff worked local woman organization n 5 staff charge femalespecific intervention andor gender training n 6 programme meeting attended local woman organization female community leader n 7 staff carried gender analysis ddr programme budget n 8 indicator data disaggregated gender n 9 indicator data reflects female specific status andor issue n 10 number gender training conducted ddr programme staff n 11 staff familiar security council resolution 1325 n 12 staff familiar gender issue associated conflict eg genderbased violence human trafficking n 13 training specifically aimed understanding gender issue use gender analysis frame work conduct n 14 distribution guideline manual gender analysis gender mainstreaming ddr programme management", "ProcessedSent": " staff used gender analysis framework need assessment situational analysis orand evaluation n 3", "SentID": 7224 }, { "ParagraphID": 2198, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. % of staff who have participated in gender training \\n 2. % of staff who have used gender analysis framework in needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \\n 3. % of staff who have interviewed girls and women for needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \\n 4. % of staff who have worked with local women\u2019s organizations \\n 5. % of staff who are in charge of female-specific interventions and\/or gender training \\n 6. % of the programme meetings attended by local women\u2019s organizations and female community leaders \\n 7. % of staff who have carried out gender analysis of the DDR programme budget \\n 8. % of indicators and data disaggregated by gender \\n 9. % of indicators and data that reflects female specific status and\/or issues \\n 10. Number of gender trainings conducted for DDR programme staff \\n 11. % of staff who are familiar with Security Council resolution 1325 \\n 12. % of staff who are familiar with gender issues associated with conflicts (e.g. gender-based violence, human trafficking) \\n 13. % of training specifically aimed at understanding gender issues and use of gender analysis frame\u00adworks for those who conduct M&E \\n 14. distribution of guidelines or manual for gender analysis and gender mainstreaming for DDR programme management", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. % of staff who have participated in gender training \n 2. % of staff who have used gender analysis framework in needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \n 3. % of staff who have interviewed girls and women for needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \n 4. % of staff who have worked with local women\u2019s organizations \n 5. % of staff who are in charge of female-specific interventions and\/or gender training \n 6. % of the programme meetings attended by local women\u2019s organizations and female community leaders \n 7. % of staff who have carried out gender analysis of the DDR programme budget \n 8. % of indicators and data disaggregated by gender \n 9. % of indicators and data that reflects female specific status and\/or issues \n 10. Number of gender trainings conducted for DDR programme staff \n 11. % of staff who are familiar with Security Council resolution 1325 \n 12. % of staff who are familiar with gender issues associated with conflicts (e.g. gender-based violence, human trafficking) \n 13. % of training specifically aimed at understanding gender issues and use of gender analysis frame\u00adworks for those who conduct M&E \n 14. distribution of guidelines or manual for gender analysis and gender mainstreaming for DDR programme management", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130062,14 +130062,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% of staff who have interviewed girls and women for needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \\n 4.", + "Sentence": "% of staff who have interviewed girls and women for needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \n 4.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 staff participated gender training n 2 staff used gender analysis framework need assessment situational analysis orand evaluation n 3 staff interviewed girl woman need assessment situational analysis orand evaluation n 4 staff worked local woman organization n 5 staff charge femalespecific intervention andor gender training n 6 programme meeting attended local woman organization female community leader n 7 staff carried gender analysis ddr programme budget n 8 indicator data disaggregated gender n 9 indicator data reflects female specific status andor issue n 10 number gender training conducted ddr programme staff n 11 staff familiar security council resolution 1325 n 12 staff familiar gender issue associated conflict eg genderbased violence human trafficking n 13 training specifically aimed understanding gender issue use gender analysis frame work conduct n 14 distribution guideline manual gender analysis gender mainstreaming ddr programme management", "ProcessedSent": " staff interviewed girl woman need assessment situational analysis orand evaluation n 4", "SentID": 7225 }, { "ParagraphID": 2198, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. % of staff who have participated in gender training \\n 2. % of staff who have used gender analysis framework in needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \\n 3. % of staff who have interviewed girls and women for needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \\n 4. % of staff who have worked with local women\u2019s organizations \\n 5. % of staff who are in charge of female-specific interventions and\/or gender training \\n 6. % of the programme meetings attended by local women\u2019s organizations and female community leaders \\n 7. % of staff who have carried out gender analysis of the DDR programme budget \\n 8. % of indicators and data disaggregated by gender \\n 9. % of indicators and data that reflects female specific status and\/or issues \\n 10. Number of gender trainings conducted for DDR programme staff \\n 11. % of staff who are familiar with Security Council resolution 1325 \\n 12. % of staff who are familiar with gender issues associated with conflicts (e.g. gender-based violence, human trafficking) \\n 13. % of training specifically aimed at understanding gender issues and use of gender analysis frame\u00adworks for those who conduct M&E \\n 14. distribution of guidelines or manual for gender analysis and gender mainstreaming for DDR programme management", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. % of staff who have participated in gender training \n 2. % of staff who have used gender analysis framework in needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \n 3. % of staff who have interviewed girls and women for needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \n 4. % of staff who have worked with local women\u2019s organizations \n 5. % of staff who are in charge of female-specific interventions and\/or gender training \n 6. % of the programme meetings attended by local women\u2019s organizations and female community leaders \n 7. % of staff who have carried out gender analysis of the DDR programme budget \n 8. % of indicators and data disaggregated by gender \n 9. % of indicators and data that reflects female specific status and\/or issues \n 10. Number of gender trainings conducted for DDR programme staff \n 11. % of staff who are familiar with Security Council resolution 1325 \n 12. % of staff who are familiar with gender issues associated with conflicts (e.g. gender-based violence, human trafficking) \n 13. % of training specifically aimed at understanding gender issues and use of gender analysis frame\u00adworks for those who conduct M&E \n 14. distribution of guidelines or manual for gender analysis and gender mainstreaming for DDR programme management", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130080,14 +130080,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% of staff who have worked with local women\u2019s organizations \\n 5.", + "Sentence": "% of staff who have worked with local women\u2019s organizations \n 5.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 staff participated gender training n 2 staff used gender analysis framework need assessment situational analysis orand evaluation n 3 staff interviewed girl woman need assessment situational analysis orand evaluation n 4 staff worked local woman organization n 5 staff charge femalespecific intervention andor gender training n 6 programme meeting attended local woman organization female community leader n 7 staff carried gender analysis ddr programme budget n 8 indicator data disaggregated gender n 9 indicator data reflects female specific status andor issue n 10 number gender training conducted ddr programme staff n 11 staff familiar security council resolution 1325 n 12 staff familiar gender issue associated conflict eg genderbased violence human trafficking n 13 training specifically aimed understanding gender issue use gender analysis frame work conduct n 14 distribution guideline manual gender analysis gender mainstreaming ddr programme management", "ProcessedSent": " staff worked local woman organization n 5", "SentID": 7226 }, { "ParagraphID": 2198, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. % of staff who have participated in gender training \\n 2. % of staff who have used gender analysis framework in needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \\n 3. % of staff who have interviewed girls and women for needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \\n 4. % of staff who have worked with local women\u2019s organizations \\n 5. % of staff who are in charge of female-specific interventions and\/or gender training \\n 6. % of the programme meetings attended by local women\u2019s organizations and female community leaders \\n 7. % of staff who have carried out gender analysis of the DDR programme budget \\n 8. % of indicators and data disaggregated by gender \\n 9. % of indicators and data that reflects female specific status and\/or issues \\n 10. Number of gender trainings conducted for DDR programme staff \\n 11. % of staff who are familiar with Security Council resolution 1325 \\n 12. % of staff who are familiar with gender issues associated with conflicts (e.g. gender-based violence, human trafficking) \\n 13. % of training specifically aimed at understanding gender issues and use of gender analysis frame\u00adworks for those who conduct M&E \\n 14. distribution of guidelines or manual for gender analysis and gender mainstreaming for DDR programme management", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. % of staff who have participated in gender training \n 2. % of staff who have used gender analysis framework in needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \n 3. % of staff who have interviewed girls and women for needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \n 4. % of staff who have worked with local women\u2019s organizations \n 5. % of staff who are in charge of female-specific interventions and\/or gender training \n 6. % of the programme meetings attended by local women\u2019s organizations and female community leaders \n 7. % of staff who have carried out gender analysis of the DDR programme budget \n 8. % of indicators and data disaggregated by gender \n 9. % of indicators and data that reflects female specific status and\/or issues \n 10. Number of gender trainings conducted for DDR programme staff \n 11. % of staff who are familiar with Security Council resolution 1325 \n 12. % of staff who are familiar with gender issues associated with conflicts (e.g. gender-based violence, human trafficking) \n 13. % of training specifically aimed at understanding gender issues and use of gender analysis frame\u00adworks for those who conduct M&E \n 14. distribution of guidelines or manual for gender analysis and gender mainstreaming for DDR programme management", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130098,14 +130098,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% of staff who are in charge of female-specific interventions and\/or gender training \\n 6.", + "Sentence": "% of staff who are in charge of female-specific interventions and\/or gender training \n 6.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 staff participated gender training n 2 staff used gender analysis framework need assessment situational analysis orand evaluation n 3 staff interviewed girl woman need assessment situational analysis orand evaluation n 4 staff worked local woman organization n 5 staff charge femalespecific intervention andor gender training n 6 programme meeting attended local woman organization female community leader n 7 staff carried gender analysis ddr programme budget n 8 indicator data disaggregated gender n 9 indicator data reflects female specific status andor issue n 10 number gender training conducted ddr programme staff n 11 staff familiar security council resolution 1325 n 12 staff familiar gender issue associated conflict eg genderbased violence human trafficking n 13 training specifically aimed understanding gender issue use gender analysis frame work conduct n 14 distribution guideline manual gender analysis gender mainstreaming ddr programme management", "ProcessedSent": " staff charge femalespecific intervention andor gender training n 6", "SentID": 7227 }, { "ParagraphID": 2198, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. % of staff who have participated in gender training \\n 2. % of staff who have used gender analysis framework in needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \\n 3. % of staff who have interviewed girls and women for needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \\n 4. % of staff who have worked with local women\u2019s organizations \\n 5. % of staff who are in charge of female-specific interventions and\/or gender training \\n 6. % of the programme meetings attended by local women\u2019s organizations and female community leaders \\n 7. % of staff who have carried out gender analysis of the DDR programme budget \\n 8. % of indicators and data disaggregated by gender \\n 9. % of indicators and data that reflects female specific status and\/or issues \\n 10. Number of gender trainings conducted for DDR programme staff \\n 11. % of staff who are familiar with Security Council resolution 1325 \\n 12. % of staff who are familiar with gender issues associated with conflicts (e.g. gender-based violence, human trafficking) \\n 13. % of training specifically aimed at understanding gender issues and use of gender analysis frame\u00adworks for those who conduct M&E \\n 14. distribution of guidelines or manual for gender analysis and gender mainstreaming for DDR programme management", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. % of staff who have participated in gender training \n 2. % of staff who have used gender analysis framework in needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \n 3. % of staff who have interviewed girls and women for needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \n 4. % of staff who have worked with local women\u2019s organizations \n 5. % of staff who are in charge of female-specific interventions and\/or gender training \n 6. % of the programme meetings attended by local women\u2019s organizations and female community leaders \n 7. % of staff who have carried out gender analysis of the DDR programme budget \n 8. % of indicators and data disaggregated by gender \n 9. % of indicators and data that reflects female specific status and\/or issues \n 10. Number of gender trainings conducted for DDR programme staff \n 11. % of staff who are familiar with Security Council resolution 1325 \n 12. % of staff who are familiar with gender issues associated with conflicts (e.g. gender-based violence, human trafficking) \n 13. % of training specifically aimed at understanding gender issues and use of gender analysis frame\u00adworks for those who conduct M&E \n 14. distribution of guidelines or manual for gender analysis and gender mainstreaming for DDR programme management", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130116,14 +130116,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% of the programme meetings attended by local women\u2019s organizations and female community leaders \\n 7.", + "Sentence": "% of the programme meetings attended by local women\u2019s organizations and female community leaders \n 7.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 staff participated gender training n 2 staff used gender analysis framework need assessment situational analysis orand evaluation n 3 staff interviewed girl woman need assessment situational analysis orand evaluation n 4 staff worked local woman organization n 5 staff charge femalespecific intervention andor gender training n 6 programme meeting attended local woman organization female community leader n 7 staff carried gender analysis ddr programme budget n 8 indicator data disaggregated gender n 9 indicator data reflects female specific status andor issue n 10 number gender training conducted ddr programme staff n 11 staff familiar security council resolution 1325 n 12 staff familiar gender issue associated conflict eg genderbased violence human trafficking n 13 training specifically aimed understanding gender issue use gender analysis frame work conduct n 14 distribution guideline manual gender analysis gender mainstreaming ddr programme management", "ProcessedSent": " programme meeting attended local woman organization female community leader n 7", "SentID": 7228 }, { "ParagraphID": 2198, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. % of staff who have participated in gender training \\n 2. % of staff who have used gender analysis framework in needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \\n 3. % of staff who have interviewed girls and women for needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \\n 4. % of staff who have worked with local women\u2019s organizations \\n 5. % of staff who are in charge of female-specific interventions and\/or gender training \\n 6. % of the programme meetings attended by local women\u2019s organizations and female community leaders \\n 7. % of staff who have carried out gender analysis of the DDR programme budget \\n 8. % of indicators and data disaggregated by gender \\n 9. % of indicators and data that reflects female specific status and\/or issues \\n 10. Number of gender trainings conducted for DDR programme staff \\n 11. % of staff who are familiar with Security Council resolution 1325 \\n 12. % of staff who are familiar with gender issues associated with conflicts (e.g. gender-based violence, human trafficking) \\n 13. % of training specifically aimed at understanding gender issues and use of gender analysis frame\u00adworks for those who conduct M&E \\n 14. distribution of guidelines or manual for gender analysis and gender mainstreaming for DDR programme management", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. % of staff who have participated in gender training \n 2. % of staff who have used gender analysis framework in needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \n 3. % of staff who have interviewed girls and women for needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \n 4. % of staff who have worked with local women\u2019s organizations \n 5. % of staff who are in charge of female-specific interventions and\/or gender training \n 6. % of the programme meetings attended by local women\u2019s organizations and female community leaders \n 7. % of staff who have carried out gender analysis of the DDR programme budget \n 8. % of indicators and data disaggregated by gender \n 9. % of indicators and data that reflects female specific status and\/or issues \n 10. Number of gender trainings conducted for DDR programme staff \n 11. % of staff who are familiar with Security Council resolution 1325 \n 12. % of staff who are familiar with gender issues associated with conflicts (e.g. gender-based violence, human trafficking) \n 13. % of training specifically aimed at understanding gender issues and use of gender analysis frame\u00adworks for those who conduct M&E \n 14. distribution of guidelines or manual for gender analysis and gender mainstreaming for DDR programme management", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130134,14 +130134,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% of staff who have carried out gender analysis of the DDR programme budget \\n 8.", + "Sentence": "% of staff who have carried out gender analysis of the DDR programme budget \n 8.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 staff participated gender training n 2 staff used gender analysis framework need assessment situational analysis orand evaluation n 3 staff interviewed girl woman need assessment situational analysis orand evaluation n 4 staff worked local woman organization n 5 staff charge femalespecific intervention andor gender training n 6 programme meeting attended local woman organization female community leader n 7 staff carried gender analysis ddr programme budget n 8 indicator data disaggregated gender n 9 indicator data reflects female specific status andor issue n 10 number gender training conducted ddr programme staff n 11 staff familiar security council resolution 1325 n 12 staff familiar gender issue associated conflict eg genderbased violence human trafficking n 13 training specifically aimed understanding gender issue use gender analysis frame work conduct n 14 distribution guideline manual gender analysis gender mainstreaming ddr programme management", "ProcessedSent": " staff carried gender analysis ddr programme budget n 8", "SentID": 7229 }, { "ParagraphID": 2198, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. % of staff who have participated in gender training \\n 2. % of staff who have used gender analysis framework in needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \\n 3. % of staff who have interviewed girls and women for needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \\n 4. % of staff who have worked with local women\u2019s organizations \\n 5. % of staff who are in charge of female-specific interventions and\/or gender training \\n 6. % of the programme meetings attended by local women\u2019s organizations and female community leaders \\n 7. % of staff who have carried out gender analysis of the DDR programme budget \\n 8. % of indicators and data disaggregated by gender \\n 9. % of indicators and data that reflects female specific status and\/or issues \\n 10. Number of gender trainings conducted for DDR programme staff \\n 11. % of staff who are familiar with Security Council resolution 1325 \\n 12. % of staff who are familiar with gender issues associated with conflicts (e.g. gender-based violence, human trafficking) \\n 13. % of training specifically aimed at understanding gender issues and use of gender analysis frame\u00adworks for those who conduct M&E \\n 14. distribution of guidelines or manual for gender analysis and gender mainstreaming for DDR programme management", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. % of staff who have participated in gender training \n 2. % of staff who have used gender analysis framework in needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \n 3. % of staff who have interviewed girls and women for needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \n 4. % of staff who have worked with local women\u2019s organizations \n 5. % of staff who are in charge of female-specific interventions and\/or gender training \n 6. % of the programme meetings attended by local women\u2019s organizations and female community leaders \n 7. % of staff who have carried out gender analysis of the DDR programme budget \n 8. % of indicators and data disaggregated by gender \n 9. % of indicators and data that reflects female specific status and\/or issues \n 10. Number of gender trainings conducted for DDR programme staff \n 11. % of staff who are familiar with Security Council resolution 1325 \n 12. % of staff who are familiar with gender issues associated with conflicts (e.g. gender-based violence, human trafficking) \n 13. % of training specifically aimed at understanding gender issues and use of gender analysis frame\u00adworks for those who conduct M&E \n 14. distribution of guidelines or manual for gender analysis and gender mainstreaming for DDR programme management", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130152,14 +130152,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% of indicators and data disaggregated by gender \\n 9.", + "Sentence": "% of indicators and data disaggregated by gender \n 9.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 staff participated gender training n 2 staff used gender analysis framework need assessment situational analysis orand evaluation n 3 staff interviewed girl woman need assessment situational analysis orand evaluation n 4 staff worked local woman organization n 5 staff charge femalespecific intervention andor gender training n 6 programme meeting attended local woman organization female community leader n 7 staff carried gender analysis ddr programme budget n 8 indicator data disaggregated gender n 9 indicator data reflects female specific status andor issue n 10 number gender training conducted ddr programme staff n 11 staff familiar security council resolution 1325 n 12 staff familiar gender issue associated conflict eg genderbased violence human trafficking n 13 training specifically aimed understanding gender issue use gender analysis frame work conduct n 14 distribution guideline manual gender analysis gender mainstreaming ddr programme management", "ProcessedSent": " indicator data disaggregated gender n 9", "SentID": 7230 }, { "ParagraphID": 2198, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. % of staff who have participated in gender training \\n 2. % of staff who have used gender analysis framework in needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \\n 3. % of staff who have interviewed girls and women for needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \\n 4. % of staff who have worked with local women\u2019s organizations \\n 5. % of staff who are in charge of female-specific interventions and\/or gender training \\n 6. % of the programme meetings attended by local women\u2019s organizations and female community leaders \\n 7. % of staff who have carried out gender analysis of the DDR programme budget \\n 8. % of indicators and data disaggregated by gender \\n 9. % of indicators and data that reflects female specific status and\/or issues \\n 10. Number of gender trainings conducted for DDR programme staff \\n 11. % of staff who are familiar with Security Council resolution 1325 \\n 12. % of staff who are familiar with gender issues associated with conflicts (e.g. gender-based violence, human trafficking) \\n 13. % of training specifically aimed at understanding gender issues and use of gender analysis frame\u00adworks for those who conduct M&E \\n 14. distribution of guidelines or manual for gender analysis and gender mainstreaming for DDR programme management", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. % of staff who have participated in gender training \n 2. % of staff who have used gender analysis framework in needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \n 3. % of staff who have interviewed girls and women for needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \n 4. % of staff who have worked with local women\u2019s organizations \n 5. % of staff who are in charge of female-specific interventions and\/or gender training \n 6. % of the programme meetings attended by local women\u2019s organizations and female community leaders \n 7. % of staff who have carried out gender analysis of the DDR programme budget \n 8. % of indicators and data disaggregated by gender \n 9. % of indicators and data that reflects female specific status and\/or issues \n 10. Number of gender trainings conducted for DDR programme staff \n 11. % of staff who are familiar with Security Council resolution 1325 \n 12. % of staff who are familiar with gender issues associated with conflicts (e.g. gender-based violence, human trafficking) \n 13. % of training specifically aimed at understanding gender issues and use of gender analysis frame\u00adworks for those who conduct M&E \n 14. distribution of guidelines or manual for gender analysis and gender mainstreaming for DDR programme management", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130170,14 +130170,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% of indicators and data that reflects female specific status and\/or issues \\n 10.", + "Sentence": "% of indicators and data that reflects female specific status and\/or issues \n 10.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 staff participated gender training n 2 staff used gender analysis framework need assessment situational analysis orand evaluation n 3 staff interviewed girl woman need assessment situational analysis orand evaluation n 4 staff worked local woman organization n 5 staff charge femalespecific intervention andor gender training n 6 programme meeting attended local woman organization female community leader n 7 staff carried gender analysis ddr programme budget n 8 indicator data disaggregated gender n 9 indicator data reflects female specific status andor issue n 10 number gender training conducted ddr programme staff n 11 staff familiar security council resolution 1325 n 12 staff familiar gender issue associated conflict eg genderbased violence human trafficking n 13 training specifically aimed understanding gender issue use gender analysis frame work conduct n 14 distribution guideline manual gender analysis gender mainstreaming ddr programme management", "ProcessedSent": " indicator data reflects female specific status andor issue n 10", "SentID": 7231 }, { "ParagraphID": 2198, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. % of staff who have participated in gender training \\n 2. % of staff who have used gender analysis framework in needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \\n 3. % of staff who have interviewed girls and women for needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \\n 4. % of staff who have worked with local women\u2019s organizations \\n 5. % of staff who are in charge of female-specific interventions and\/or gender training \\n 6. % of the programme meetings attended by local women\u2019s organizations and female community leaders \\n 7. % of staff who have carried out gender analysis of the DDR programme budget \\n 8. % of indicators and data disaggregated by gender \\n 9. % of indicators and data that reflects female specific status and\/or issues \\n 10. Number of gender trainings conducted for DDR programme staff \\n 11. % of staff who are familiar with Security Council resolution 1325 \\n 12. % of staff who are familiar with gender issues associated with conflicts (e.g. gender-based violence, human trafficking) \\n 13. % of training specifically aimed at understanding gender issues and use of gender analysis frame\u00adworks for those who conduct M&E \\n 14. distribution of guidelines or manual for gender analysis and gender mainstreaming for DDR programme management", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. % of staff who have participated in gender training \n 2. % of staff who have used gender analysis framework in needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \n 3. % of staff who have interviewed girls and women for needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \n 4. % of staff who have worked with local women\u2019s organizations \n 5. % of staff who are in charge of female-specific interventions and\/or gender training \n 6. % of the programme meetings attended by local women\u2019s organizations and female community leaders \n 7. % of staff who have carried out gender analysis of the DDR programme budget \n 8. % of indicators and data disaggregated by gender \n 9. % of indicators and data that reflects female specific status and\/or issues \n 10. Number of gender trainings conducted for DDR programme staff \n 11. % of staff who are familiar with Security Council resolution 1325 \n 12. % of staff who are familiar with gender issues associated with conflicts (e.g. gender-based violence, human trafficking) \n 13. % of training specifically aimed at understanding gender issues and use of gender analysis frame\u00adworks for those who conduct M&E \n 14. distribution of guidelines or manual for gender analysis and gender mainstreaming for DDR programme management", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130188,14 +130188,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Number of gender trainings conducted for DDR programme staff \\n 11.", + "Sentence": "Number of gender trainings conducted for DDR programme staff \n 11.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 staff participated gender training n 2 staff used gender analysis framework need assessment situational analysis orand evaluation n 3 staff interviewed girl woman need assessment situational analysis orand evaluation n 4 staff worked local woman organization n 5 staff charge femalespecific intervention andor gender training n 6 programme meeting attended local woman organization female community leader n 7 staff carried gender analysis ddr programme budget n 8 indicator data disaggregated gender n 9 indicator data reflects female specific status andor issue n 10 number gender training conducted ddr programme staff n 11 staff familiar security council resolution 1325 n 12 staff familiar gender issue associated conflict eg genderbased violence human trafficking n 13 training specifically aimed understanding gender issue use gender analysis frame work conduct n 14 distribution guideline manual gender analysis gender mainstreaming ddr programme management", "ProcessedSent": "number gender training conducted ddr programme staff n 11", "SentID": 7232 }, { "ParagraphID": 2198, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. % of staff who have participated in gender training \\n 2. % of staff who have used gender analysis framework in needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \\n 3. % of staff who have interviewed girls and women for needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \\n 4. % of staff who have worked with local women\u2019s organizations \\n 5. % of staff who are in charge of female-specific interventions and\/or gender training \\n 6. % of the programme meetings attended by local women\u2019s organizations and female community leaders \\n 7. % of staff who have carried out gender analysis of the DDR programme budget \\n 8. % of indicators and data disaggregated by gender \\n 9. % of indicators and data that reflects female specific status and\/or issues \\n 10. Number of gender trainings conducted for DDR programme staff \\n 11. % of staff who are familiar with Security Council resolution 1325 \\n 12. % of staff who are familiar with gender issues associated with conflicts (e.g. gender-based violence, human trafficking) \\n 13. % of training specifically aimed at understanding gender issues and use of gender analysis frame\u00adworks for those who conduct M&E \\n 14. distribution of guidelines or manual for gender analysis and gender mainstreaming for DDR programme management", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. % of staff who have participated in gender training \n 2. % of staff who have used gender analysis framework in needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \n 3. % of staff who have interviewed girls and women for needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \n 4. % of staff who have worked with local women\u2019s organizations \n 5. % of staff who are in charge of female-specific interventions and\/or gender training \n 6. % of the programme meetings attended by local women\u2019s organizations and female community leaders \n 7. % of staff who have carried out gender analysis of the DDR programme budget \n 8. % of indicators and data disaggregated by gender \n 9. % of indicators and data that reflects female specific status and\/or issues \n 10. Number of gender trainings conducted for DDR programme staff \n 11. % of staff who are familiar with Security Council resolution 1325 \n 12. % of staff who are familiar with gender issues associated with conflicts (e.g. gender-based violence, human trafficking) \n 13. % of training specifically aimed at understanding gender issues and use of gender analysis frame\u00adworks for those who conduct M&E \n 14. distribution of guidelines or manual for gender analysis and gender mainstreaming for DDR programme management", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130206,14 +130206,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% of staff who are familiar with Security Council resolution 1325 \\n 12.", + "Sentence": "% of staff who are familiar with Security Council resolution 1325 \n 12.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 staff participated gender training n 2 staff used gender analysis framework need assessment situational analysis orand evaluation n 3 staff interviewed girl woman need assessment situational analysis orand evaluation n 4 staff worked local woman organization n 5 staff charge femalespecific intervention andor gender training n 6 programme meeting attended local woman organization female community leader n 7 staff carried gender analysis ddr programme budget n 8 indicator data disaggregated gender n 9 indicator data reflects female specific status andor issue n 10 number gender training conducted ddr programme staff n 11 staff familiar security council resolution 1325 n 12 staff familiar gender issue associated conflict eg genderbased violence human trafficking n 13 training specifically aimed understanding gender issue use gender analysis frame work conduct n 14 distribution guideline manual gender analysis gender mainstreaming ddr programme management", "ProcessedSent": " staff familiar security council resolution 1325 n 12", "SentID": 7233 }, { "ParagraphID": 2198, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. % of staff who have participated in gender training \\n 2. % of staff who have used gender analysis framework in needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \\n 3. % of staff who have interviewed girls and women for needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \\n 4. % of staff who have worked with local women\u2019s organizations \\n 5. % of staff who are in charge of female-specific interventions and\/or gender training \\n 6. % of the programme meetings attended by local women\u2019s organizations and female community leaders \\n 7. % of staff who have carried out gender analysis of the DDR programme budget \\n 8. % of indicators and data disaggregated by gender \\n 9. % of indicators and data that reflects female specific status and\/or issues \\n 10. Number of gender trainings conducted for DDR programme staff \\n 11. % of staff who are familiar with Security Council resolution 1325 \\n 12. % of staff who are familiar with gender issues associated with conflicts (e.g. gender-based violence, human trafficking) \\n 13. % of training specifically aimed at understanding gender issues and use of gender analysis frame\u00adworks for those who conduct M&E \\n 14. distribution of guidelines or manual for gender analysis and gender mainstreaming for DDR programme management", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. % of staff who have participated in gender training \n 2. % of staff who have used gender analysis framework in needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \n 3. % of staff who have interviewed girls and women for needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \n 4. % of staff who have worked with local women\u2019s organizations \n 5. % of staff who are in charge of female-specific interventions and\/or gender training \n 6. % of the programme meetings attended by local women\u2019s organizations and female community leaders \n 7. % of staff who have carried out gender analysis of the DDR programme budget \n 8. % of indicators and data disaggregated by gender \n 9. % of indicators and data that reflects female specific status and\/or issues \n 10. Number of gender trainings conducted for DDR programme staff \n 11. % of staff who are familiar with Security Council resolution 1325 \n 12. % of staff who are familiar with gender issues associated with conflicts (e.g. gender-based violence, human trafficking) \n 13. % of training specifically aimed at understanding gender issues and use of gender analysis frame\u00adworks for those who conduct M&E \n 14. distribution of guidelines or manual for gender analysis and gender mainstreaming for DDR programme management", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130231,7 +130231,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2198, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. % of staff who have participated in gender training \\n 2. % of staff who have used gender analysis framework in needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \\n 3. % of staff who have interviewed girls and women for needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \\n 4. % of staff who have worked with local women\u2019s organizations \\n 5. % of staff who are in charge of female-specific interventions and\/or gender training \\n 6. % of the programme meetings attended by local women\u2019s organizations and female community leaders \\n 7. % of staff who have carried out gender analysis of the DDR programme budget \\n 8. % of indicators and data disaggregated by gender \\n 9. % of indicators and data that reflects female specific status and\/or issues \\n 10. Number of gender trainings conducted for DDR programme staff \\n 11. % of staff who are familiar with Security Council resolution 1325 \\n 12. % of staff who are familiar with gender issues associated with conflicts (e.g. gender-based violence, human trafficking) \\n 13. % of training specifically aimed at understanding gender issues and use of gender analysis frame\u00adworks for those who conduct M&E \\n 14. distribution of guidelines or manual for gender analysis and gender mainstreaming for DDR programme management", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. % of staff who have participated in gender training \n 2. % of staff who have used gender analysis framework in needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \n 3. % of staff who have interviewed girls and women for needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \n 4. % of staff who have worked with local women\u2019s organizations \n 5. % of staff who are in charge of female-specific interventions and\/or gender training \n 6. % of the programme meetings attended by local women\u2019s organizations and female community leaders \n 7. % of staff who have carried out gender analysis of the DDR programme budget \n 8. % of indicators and data disaggregated by gender \n 9. % of indicators and data that reflects female specific status and\/or issues \n 10. Number of gender trainings conducted for DDR programme staff \n 11. % of staff who are familiar with Security Council resolution 1325 \n 12. % of staff who are familiar with gender issues associated with conflicts (e.g. gender-based violence, human trafficking) \n 13. % of training specifically aimed at understanding gender issues and use of gender analysis frame\u00adworks for those who conduct M&E \n 14. distribution of guidelines or manual for gender analysis and gender mainstreaming for DDR programme management", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130242,14 +130242,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "gender-based violence, human trafficking) \\n 13.", + "Sentence": "gender-based violence, human trafficking) \n 13.", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 staff participated gender training n 2 staff used gender analysis framework need assessment situational analysis orand evaluation n 3 staff interviewed girl woman need assessment situational analysis orand evaluation n 4 staff worked local woman organization n 5 staff charge femalespecific intervention andor gender training n 6 programme meeting attended local woman organization female community leader n 7 staff carried gender analysis ddr programme budget n 8 indicator data disaggregated gender n 9 indicator data reflects female specific status andor issue n 10 number gender training conducted ddr programme staff n 11 staff familiar security council resolution 1325 n 12 staff familiar gender issue associated conflict eg genderbased violence human trafficking n 13 training specifically aimed understanding gender issue use gender analysis frame work conduct n 14 distribution guideline manual gender analysis gender mainstreaming ddr programme management", "ProcessedSent": "genderbased violence human trafficking n 13", "SentID": 7235 }, { "ParagraphID": 2198, - "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \\n 1. % of staff who have participated in gender training \\n 2. % of staff who have used gender analysis framework in needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \\n 3. % of staff who have interviewed girls and women for needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \\n 4. % of staff who have worked with local women\u2019s organizations \\n 5. % of staff who are in charge of female-specific interventions and\/or gender training \\n 6. % of the programme meetings attended by local women\u2019s organizations and female community leaders \\n 7. % of staff who have carried out gender analysis of the DDR programme budget \\n 8. % of indicators and data disaggregated by gender \\n 9. % of indicators and data that reflects female specific status and\/or issues \\n 10. Number of gender trainings conducted for DDR programme staff \\n 11. % of staff who are familiar with Security Council resolution 1325 \\n 12. % of staff who are familiar with gender issues associated with conflicts (e.g. gender-based violence, human trafficking) \\n 13. % of training specifically aimed at understanding gender issues and use of gender analysis frame\u00adworks for those who conduct M&E \\n 14. distribution of guidelines or manual for gender analysis and gender mainstreaming for DDR programme management", + "Paragraph": "KEY MEASURABLE INDICATORS \n 1. % of staff who have participated in gender training \n 2. % of staff who have used gender analysis framework in needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \n 3. % of staff who have interviewed girls and women for needs assessment, situational analyses or\/and evaluation \n 4. % of staff who have worked with local women\u2019s organizations \n 5. % of staff who are in charge of female-specific interventions and\/or gender training \n 6. % of the programme meetings attended by local women\u2019s organizations and female community leaders \n 7. % of staff who have carried out gender analysis of the DDR programme budget \n 8. % of indicators and data disaggregated by gender \n 9. % of indicators and data that reflects female specific status and\/or issues \n 10. Number of gender trainings conducted for DDR programme staff \n 11. % of staff who are familiar with Security Council resolution 1325 \n 12. % of staff who are familiar with gender issues associated with conflicts (e.g. gender-based violence, human trafficking) \n 13. % of training specifically aimed at understanding gender issues and use of gender analysis frame\u00adworks for those who conduct M&E \n 14. distribution of guidelines or manual for gender analysis and gender mainstreaming for DDR programme management", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130260,14 +130260,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "% of training specifically aimed at understanding gender issues and use of gender analysis frame\u00adworks for those who conduct M&E \\n 14. distribution of guidelines or manual for gender analysis and gender mainstreaming for DDR programme management", + "Sentence": "% of training specifically aimed at understanding gender issues and use of gender analysis frame\u00adworks for those who conduct M&E \n 14. distribution of guidelines or manual for gender analysis and gender mainstreaming for DDR programme management", "newParagraph": "key measurable indicator n 1 staff participated gender training n 2 staff used gender analysis framework need assessment situational analysis orand evaluation n 3 staff interviewed girl woman need assessment situational analysis orand evaluation n 4 staff worked local woman organization n 5 staff charge femalespecific intervention andor gender training n 6 programme meeting attended local woman organization female community leader n 7 staff carried gender analysis ddr programme budget n 8 indicator data disaggregated gender n 9 indicator data reflects female specific status andor issue n 10 number gender training conducted ddr programme staff n 11 staff familiar security council resolution 1325 n 12 staff familiar gender issue associated conflict eg genderbased violence human trafficking n 13 training specifically aimed understanding gender issue use gender analysis frame work conduct n 14 distribution guideline manual gender analysis gender mainstreaming ddr programme management", "ProcessedSent": " training specifically aimed understanding gender issue use gender analysis frame work conduct n 14 distribution guideline manual gender analysis gender mainstreaming ddr programme management", "SentID": 7236 }, { "ParagraphID": 2199, - "Paragraph": "This module was largely derived from: UN Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM), Get- ting It Right, Doing It Right: Gender and Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration, UNIFEM, New York, October 2004. \\n\\n Other key sources include: \\n Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO), \u2018Mainstreaming a Gender Perspective into Multi-dimensional Peace Operations, DPKO Lessons Learned Unit, New York, July 2000, http:\/\/ pbpu.unlb.org\/pbpu\/library\/Gender%20Mainstreaming%202000.pdf. \\n Farr, Vanessa, \u2018Gendering Disarmament as a Peace-building Tool\u2019, Paper No. 20, Bonn Inter- national Center for Conversion, 2002, http:\/\/www.bicc.de\/publications\/papers\/paper20\/ paper20.pdf. \\n March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Pro- tection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/ women\/Girls\/girlsmainEN.html. \\n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, Women, War, Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assess- ment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, UNIFEM, New York, 2002.", + "Paragraph": "This module was largely derived from: UN Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM), Get- ting It Right, Doing It Right: Gender and Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration, UNIFEM, New York, October 2004. \n\n Other key sources include: \n Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO), \u2018Mainstreaming a Gender Perspective into Multi-dimensional Peace Operations, DPKO Lessons Learned Unit, New York, July 2000, http:\/\/ pbpu.unlb.org\/pbpu\/library\/Gender%20Mainstreaming%202000.pdf. \n Farr, Vanessa, \u2018Gendering Disarmament as a Peace-building Tool\u2019, Paper No. 20, Bonn Inter- national Center for Conversion, 2002, http:\/\/www.bicc.de\/publications\/papers\/paper20\/ paper20.pdf. \n March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Pro- tection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/ women\/Girls\/girlsmainEN.html. \n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, Women, War, Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assess- ment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, UNIFEM, New York, 2002.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130285,7 +130285,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2199, - "Paragraph": "This module was largely derived from: UN Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM), Get- ting It Right, Doing It Right: Gender and Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration, UNIFEM, New York, October 2004. \\n\\n Other key sources include: \\n Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO), \u2018Mainstreaming a Gender Perspective into Multi-dimensional Peace Operations, DPKO Lessons Learned Unit, New York, July 2000, http:\/\/ pbpu.unlb.org\/pbpu\/library\/Gender%20Mainstreaming%202000.pdf. \\n Farr, Vanessa, \u2018Gendering Disarmament as a Peace-building Tool\u2019, Paper No. 20, Bonn Inter- national Center for Conversion, 2002, http:\/\/www.bicc.de\/publications\/papers\/paper20\/ paper20.pdf. \\n March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Pro- tection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/ women\/Girls\/girlsmainEN.html. \\n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, Women, War, Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assess- ment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, UNIFEM, New York, 2002.", + "Paragraph": "This module was largely derived from: UN Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM), Get- ting It Right, Doing It Right: Gender and Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration, UNIFEM, New York, October 2004. \n\n Other key sources include: \n Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO), \u2018Mainstreaming a Gender Perspective into Multi-dimensional Peace Operations, DPKO Lessons Learned Unit, New York, July 2000, http:\/\/ pbpu.unlb.org\/pbpu\/library\/Gender%20Mainstreaming%202000.pdf. \n Farr, Vanessa, \u2018Gendering Disarmament as a Peace-building Tool\u2019, Paper No. 20, Bonn Inter- national Center for Conversion, 2002, http:\/\/www.bicc.de\/publications\/papers\/paper20\/ paper20.pdf. \n March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Pro- tection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/ women\/Girls\/girlsmainEN.html. \n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, Women, War, Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assess- ment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, UNIFEM, New York, 2002.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130296,14 +130296,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Other key sources include: \\n Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO), \u2018Mainstreaming a Gender Perspective into Multi-dimensional Peace Operations, DPKO Lessons Learned Unit, New York, July 2000, http:\/\/ pbpu.unlb.org\/pbpu\/library\/Gender%20Mainstreaming%202000.pdf.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Other key sources include: \n Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO), \u2018Mainstreaming a Gender Perspective into Multi-dimensional Peace Operations, DPKO Lessons Learned Unit, New York, July 2000, http:\/\/ pbpu.unlb.org\/pbpu\/library\/Gender%20Mainstreaming%202000.pdf.", "newParagraph": "module largely derived un development fund woman unifem get ting right right gender disarmament demobilization reintegration unifem new york october 2004 nn key source include n department peacekeeping operation dpko mainstreaming gender perspective multidimensional peace operation dpko lesson learned unit new york july 2000 http pbpuunlborgpbpulibrarygender20mainstreaming202000pdf n farr vanessa gendering disarmament peacebuilding tool paper 20 bonn inter national center conversion 2002 httpwwwbiccdepublicationspaperspaper20 paper20pdf n march candida ines smyth maitrayee mukhopadhyay guide genderanalysis framework oxfam press oxford 1999 n mazurana dyan susan mckay girl girl fighting force northern uganda sierra leone mozambique canadian international development agency child pro tection research fund march 2004 httpwwwichrddcaenglishcommdocpublications womengirlsgirlsmainenhtml n rehn elisabeth ellen johnsonsirleaf woman war peace independent expert ass ment impact armed conflict woman woman role peacebuilding unifem new york 2002", "ProcessedSent": "nn key source include n department peacekeeping operation dpko mainstreaming gender perspective multidimensional peace operation dpko lesson learned unit new york july 2000 http pbpuunlborgpbpulibrarygender20mainstreaming202000pdf", "SentID": 7238 }, { "ParagraphID": 2199, - "Paragraph": "This module was largely derived from: UN Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM), Get- ting It Right, Doing It Right: Gender and Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration, UNIFEM, New York, October 2004. \\n\\n Other key sources include: \\n Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO), \u2018Mainstreaming a Gender Perspective into Multi-dimensional Peace Operations, DPKO Lessons Learned Unit, New York, July 2000, http:\/\/ pbpu.unlb.org\/pbpu\/library\/Gender%20Mainstreaming%202000.pdf. \\n Farr, Vanessa, \u2018Gendering Disarmament as a Peace-building Tool\u2019, Paper No. 20, Bonn Inter- national Center for Conversion, 2002, http:\/\/www.bicc.de\/publications\/papers\/paper20\/ paper20.pdf. \\n March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Pro- tection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/ women\/Girls\/girlsmainEN.html. \\n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, Women, War, Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assess- ment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, UNIFEM, New York, 2002.", + "Paragraph": "This module was largely derived from: UN Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM), Get- ting It Right, Doing It Right: Gender and Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration, UNIFEM, New York, October 2004. \n\n Other key sources include: \n Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO), \u2018Mainstreaming a Gender Perspective into Multi-dimensional Peace Operations, DPKO Lessons Learned Unit, New York, July 2000, http:\/\/ pbpu.unlb.org\/pbpu\/library\/Gender%20Mainstreaming%202000.pdf. \n Farr, Vanessa, \u2018Gendering Disarmament as a Peace-building Tool\u2019, Paper No. 20, Bonn Inter- national Center for Conversion, 2002, http:\/\/www.bicc.de\/publications\/papers\/paper20\/ paper20.pdf. \n March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Pro- tection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/ women\/Girls\/girlsmainEN.html. \n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, Women, War, Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assess- ment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, UNIFEM, New York, 2002.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130314,14 +130314,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Farr, Vanessa, \u2018Gendering Disarmament as a Peace-building Tool\u2019, Paper No.", + "Sentence": "\n Farr, Vanessa, \u2018Gendering Disarmament as a Peace-building Tool\u2019, Paper No.", "newParagraph": "module largely derived un development fund woman unifem get ting right right gender disarmament demobilization reintegration unifem new york october 2004 nn key source include n department peacekeeping operation dpko mainstreaming gender perspective multidimensional peace operation dpko lesson learned unit new york july 2000 http pbpuunlborgpbpulibrarygender20mainstreaming202000pdf n farr vanessa gendering disarmament peacebuilding tool paper 20 bonn inter national center conversion 2002 httpwwwbiccdepublicationspaperspaper20 paper20pdf n march candida ines smyth maitrayee mukhopadhyay guide genderanalysis framework oxfam press oxford 1999 n mazurana dyan susan mckay girl girl fighting force northern uganda sierra leone mozambique canadian international development agency child pro tection research fund march 2004 httpwwwichrddcaenglishcommdocpublications womengirlsgirlsmainenhtml n rehn elisabeth ellen johnsonsirleaf woman war peace independent expert ass ment impact armed conflict woman woman role peacebuilding unifem new york 2002", "ProcessedSent": "n farr vanessa gendering disarmament peacebuilding tool paper", "SentID": 7239 }, { "ParagraphID": 2199, - "Paragraph": "This module was largely derived from: UN Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM), Get- ting It Right, Doing It Right: Gender and Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration, UNIFEM, New York, October 2004. \\n\\n Other key sources include: \\n Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO), \u2018Mainstreaming a Gender Perspective into Multi-dimensional Peace Operations, DPKO Lessons Learned Unit, New York, July 2000, http:\/\/ pbpu.unlb.org\/pbpu\/library\/Gender%20Mainstreaming%202000.pdf. \\n Farr, Vanessa, \u2018Gendering Disarmament as a Peace-building Tool\u2019, Paper No. 20, Bonn Inter- national Center for Conversion, 2002, http:\/\/www.bicc.de\/publications\/papers\/paper20\/ paper20.pdf. \\n March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Pro- tection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/ women\/Girls\/girlsmainEN.html. \\n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, Women, War, Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assess- ment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, UNIFEM, New York, 2002.", + "Paragraph": "This module was largely derived from: UN Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM), Get- ting It Right, Doing It Right: Gender and Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration, UNIFEM, New York, October 2004. \n\n Other key sources include: \n Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO), \u2018Mainstreaming a Gender Perspective into Multi-dimensional Peace Operations, DPKO Lessons Learned Unit, New York, July 2000, http:\/\/ pbpu.unlb.org\/pbpu\/library\/Gender%20Mainstreaming%202000.pdf. \n Farr, Vanessa, \u2018Gendering Disarmament as a Peace-building Tool\u2019, Paper No. 20, Bonn Inter- national Center for Conversion, 2002, http:\/\/www.bicc.de\/publications\/papers\/paper20\/ paper20.pdf. \n March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Pro- tection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/ women\/Girls\/girlsmainEN.html. \n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, Women, War, Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assess- ment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, UNIFEM, New York, 2002.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130339,7 +130339,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2199, - "Paragraph": "This module was largely derived from: UN Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM), Get- ting It Right, Doing It Right: Gender and Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration, UNIFEM, New York, October 2004. \\n\\n Other key sources include: \\n Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO), \u2018Mainstreaming a Gender Perspective into Multi-dimensional Peace Operations, DPKO Lessons Learned Unit, New York, July 2000, http:\/\/ pbpu.unlb.org\/pbpu\/library\/Gender%20Mainstreaming%202000.pdf. \\n Farr, Vanessa, \u2018Gendering Disarmament as a Peace-building Tool\u2019, Paper No. 20, Bonn Inter- national Center for Conversion, 2002, http:\/\/www.bicc.de\/publications\/papers\/paper20\/ paper20.pdf. \\n March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Pro- tection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/ women\/Girls\/girlsmainEN.html. \\n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, Women, War, Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assess- ment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, UNIFEM, New York, 2002.", + "Paragraph": "This module was largely derived from: UN Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM), Get- ting It Right, Doing It Right: Gender and Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration, UNIFEM, New York, October 2004. \n\n Other key sources include: \n Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO), \u2018Mainstreaming a Gender Perspective into Multi-dimensional Peace Operations, DPKO Lessons Learned Unit, New York, July 2000, http:\/\/ pbpu.unlb.org\/pbpu\/library\/Gender%20Mainstreaming%202000.pdf. \n Farr, Vanessa, \u2018Gendering Disarmament as a Peace-building Tool\u2019, Paper No. 20, Bonn Inter- national Center for Conversion, 2002, http:\/\/www.bicc.de\/publications\/papers\/paper20\/ paper20.pdf. \n March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Pro- tection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/ women\/Girls\/girlsmainEN.html. \n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, Women, War, Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assess- ment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, UNIFEM, New York, 2002.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130350,14 +130350,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999.", + "Sentence": "\n March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999.", "newParagraph": "module largely derived un development fund woman unifem get ting right right gender disarmament demobilization reintegration unifem new york october 2004 nn key source include n department peacekeeping operation dpko mainstreaming gender perspective multidimensional peace operation dpko lesson learned unit new york july 2000 http pbpuunlborgpbpulibrarygender20mainstreaming202000pdf n farr vanessa gendering disarmament peacebuilding tool paper 20 bonn inter national center conversion 2002 httpwwwbiccdepublicationspaperspaper20 paper20pdf n march candida ines smyth maitrayee mukhopadhyay guide genderanalysis framework oxfam press oxford 1999 n mazurana dyan susan mckay girl girl fighting force northern uganda sierra leone mozambique canadian international development agency child pro tection research fund march 2004 httpwwwichrddcaenglishcommdocpublications womengirlsgirlsmainenhtml n rehn elisabeth ellen johnsonsirleaf woman war peace independent expert ass ment impact armed conflict woman woman role peacebuilding unifem new york 2002", "ProcessedSent": "n march candida ines smyth maitrayee mukhopadhyay guide genderanalysis framework oxfam press oxford 1999", "SentID": 7241 }, { "ParagraphID": 2199, - "Paragraph": "This module was largely derived from: UN Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM), Get- ting It Right, Doing It Right: Gender and Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration, UNIFEM, New York, October 2004. \\n\\n Other key sources include: \\n Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO), \u2018Mainstreaming a Gender Perspective into Multi-dimensional Peace Operations, DPKO Lessons Learned Unit, New York, July 2000, http:\/\/ pbpu.unlb.org\/pbpu\/library\/Gender%20Mainstreaming%202000.pdf. \\n Farr, Vanessa, \u2018Gendering Disarmament as a Peace-building Tool\u2019, Paper No. 20, Bonn Inter- national Center for Conversion, 2002, http:\/\/www.bicc.de\/publications\/papers\/paper20\/ paper20.pdf. \\n March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Pro- tection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/ women\/Girls\/girlsmainEN.html. \\n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, Women, War, Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assess- ment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, UNIFEM, New York, 2002.", + "Paragraph": "This module was largely derived from: UN Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM), Get- ting It Right, Doing It Right: Gender and Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration, UNIFEM, New York, October 2004. \n\n Other key sources include: \n Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO), \u2018Mainstreaming a Gender Perspective into Multi-dimensional Peace Operations, DPKO Lessons Learned Unit, New York, July 2000, http:\/\/ pbpu.unlb.org\/pbpu\/library\/Gender%20Mainstreaming%202000.pdf. \n Farr, Vanessa, \u2018Gendering Disarmament as a Peace-building Tool\u2019, Paper No. 20, Bonn Inter- national Center for Conversion, 2002, http:\/\/www.bicc.de\/publications\/papers\/paper20\/ paper20.pdf. \n March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Pro- tection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/ women\/Girls\/girlsmainEN.html. \n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, Women, War, Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assess- ment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, UNIFEM, New York, 2002.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130368,14 +130368,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls?", + "Sentence": "\n Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls?", "newParagraph": "module largely derived un development fund woman unifem get ting right right gender disarmament demobilization reintegration unifem new york october 2004 nn key source include n department peacekeeping operation dpko mainstreaming gender perspective multidimensional peace operation dpko lesson learned unit new york july 2000 http pbpuunlborgpbpulibrarygender20mainstreaming202000pdf n farr vanessa gendering disarmament peacebuilding tool paper 20 bonn inter national center conversion 2002 httpwwwbiccdepublicationspaperspaper20 paper20pdf n march candida ines smyth maitrayee mukhopadhyay guide genderanalysis framework oxfam press oxford 1999 n mazurana dyan susan mckay girl girl fighting force northern uganda sierra leone mozambique canadian international development agency child pro tection research fund march 2004 httpwwwichrddcaenglishcommdocpublications womengirlsgirlsmainenhtml n rehn elisabeth ellen johnsonsirleaf woman war peace independent expert ass ment impact armed conflict woman woman role peacebuilding unifem new york 2002", "ProcessedSent": "n mazurana dyan susan mckay girl", "SentID": 7242 }, { "ParagraphID": 2199, - "Paragraph": "This module was largely derived from: UN Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM), Get- ting It Right, Doing It Right: Gender and Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration, UNIFEM, New York, October 2004. \\n\\n Other key sources include: \\n Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO), \u2018Mainstreaming a Gender Perspective into Multi-dimensional Peace Operations, DPKO Lessons Learned Unit, New York, July 2000, http:\/\/ pbpu.unlb.org\/pbpu\/library\/Gender%20Mainstreaming%202000.pdf. \\n Farr, Vanessa, \u2018Gendering Disarmament as a Peace-building Tool\u2019, Paper No. 20, Bonn Inter- national Center for Conversion, 2002, http:\/\/www.bicc.de\/publications\/papers\/paper20\/ paper20.pdf. \\n March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Pro- tection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/ women\/Girls\/girlsmainEN.html. \\n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, Women, War, Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assess- ment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, UNIFEM, New York, 2002.", + "Paragraph": "This module was largely derived from: UN Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM), Get- ting It Right, Doing It Right: Gender and Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration, UNIFEM, New York, October 2004. \n\n Other key sources include: \n Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO), \u2018Mainstreaming a Gender Perspective into Multi-dimensional Peace Operations, DPKO Lessons Learned Unit, New York, July 2000, http:\/\/ pbpu.unlb.org\/pbpu\/library\/Gender%20Mainstreaming%202000.pdf. \n Farr, Vanessa, \u2018Gendering Disarmament as a Peace-building Tool\u2019, Paper No. 20, Bonn Inter- national Center for Conversion, 2002, http:\/\/www.bicc.de\/publications\/papers\/paper20\/ paper20.pdf. \n March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Pro- tection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/ women\/Girls\/girlsmainEN.html. \n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, Women, War, Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assess- ment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, UNIFEM, New York, 2002.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130393,7 +130393,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2199, - "Paragraph": "This module was largely derived from: UN Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM), Get- ting It Right, Doing It Right: Gender and Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration, UNIFEM, New York, October 2004. \\n\\n Other key sources include: \\n Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO), \u2018Mainstreaming a Gender Perspective into Multi-dimensional Peace Operations, DPKO Lessons Learned Unit, New York, July 2000, http:\/\/ pbpu.unlb.org\/pbpu\/library\/Gender%20Mainstreaming%202000.pdf. \\n Farr, Vanessa, \u2018Gendering Disarmament as a Peace-building Tool\u2019, Paper No. 20, Bonn Inter- national Center for Conversion, 2002, http:\/\/www.bicc.de\/publications\/papers\/paper20\/ paper20.pdf. \\n March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Pro- tection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/ women\/Girls\/girlsmainEN.html. \\n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, Women, War, Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assess- ment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, UNIFEM, New York, 2002.", + "Paragraph": "This module was largely derived from: UN Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM), Get- ting It Right, Doing It Right: Gender and Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration, UNIFEM, New York, October 2004. \n\n Other key sources include: \n Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO), \u2018Mainstreaming a Gender Perspective into Multi-dimensional Peace Operations, DPKO Lessons Learned Unit, New York, July 2000, http:\/\/ pbpu.unlb.org\/pbpu\/library\/Gender%20Mainstreaming%202000.pdf. \n Farr, Vanessa, \u2018Gendering Disarmament as a Peace-building Tool\u2019, Paper No. 20, Bonn Inter- national Center for Conversion, 2002, http:\/\/www.bicc.de\/publications\/papers\/paper20\/ paper20.pdf. \n March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Pro- tection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/ women\/Girls\/girlsmainEN.html. \n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, Women, War, Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assess- ment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, UNIFEM, New York, 2002.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130404,14 +130404,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, Women, War, Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assess- ment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, UNIFEM, New York, 2002.", + "Sentence": "\n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, Women, War, Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assess- ment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, UNIFEM, New York, 2002.", "newParagraph": "module largely derived un development fund woman unifem get ting right right gender disarmament demobilization reintegration unifem new york october 2004 nn key source include n department peacekeeping operation dpko mainstreaming gender perspective multidimensional peace operation dpko lesson learned unit new york july 2000 http pbpuunlborgpbpulibrarygender20mainstreaming202000pdf n farr vanessa gendering disarmament peacebuilding tool paper 20 bonn inter national center conversion 2002 httpwwwbiccdepublicationspaperspaper20 paper20pdf n march candida ines smyth maitrayee mukhopadhyay guide genderanalysis framework oxfam press oxford 1999 n mazurana dyan susan mckay girl girl fighting force northern uganda sierra leone mozambique canadian international development agency child pro tection research fund march 2004 httpwwwichrddcaenglishcommdocpublications womengirlsgirlsmainenhtml n rehn elisabeth ellen johnsonsirleaf woman war peace independent expert ass ment impact armed conflict woman woman role peacebuilding unifem new york 2002", "ProcessedSent": "n rehn elisabeth ellen johnsonsirleaf woman war peace independent expert ass ment impact armed conflict woman woman role peacebuilding unifem new york 2002", "SentID": 7244 }, { "ParagraphID": 2200, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \\n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \\n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \\n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \\n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \\n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 13 Ibid. \\n 14 Ibid. \\n 15 Ibid. \\n 16 Ibid. \\n 17 Ibid. \\n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \\n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \\n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \\n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \\n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 13 Ibid. \n 14 Ibid. \n 15 Ibid. \n 16 Ibid. \n 17 Ibid. \n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130422,14 +130422,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.", + "Sentence": "\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.", "newParagraph": "n 1 nussbaum martha woman human development cambridge university press cambridge 2000 n 2 mazurana dyan susan mckay girl girl fighting force northern uganda sierra leone mozambique canadian international development agency child protection research fund march 2004 httpwwwichrddcaenglishcommdocpublicationswomengirlsgirlsmain enhtml n 3 un educational scientific cultural organization unesco gender mainstreaming imple mentation framework 2002 httpunesdocunescoorgimages0013001318131854epdf n 4 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 5 unesco op cit n 6 ibid n 7 statistic woman participation peace operation available peacekeeping watch http wwwpeacewomenorgunpkwatchpkindexhtml n 8 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 9 unesco op cit n 10 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchaspuserlistaspparentid10314 n 11 march candida ines smyth maitrayee mukhopadhyay guide genderanalysis framework oxfam press oxford 1999 n 12 unesco op cit n 13 ibid n 14 ibid n 15 ibid n 16 ibid n 17 ibid n 18 httpwww1umneduhumanrtsinstreee4devwhtm n 19 checklist drawn partially un interagency taskforce woman peace security gender checklist peace operation june 2003 n 20 question drawn de watteville nathalie addressing gender issue demobili zation reintegration program world bank washington dc may 2002 httpwwwworldbank orgafrwpswp33pdf n 21 march smyth mukhopadhyay op cit n 22 matrix based ibid", "ProcessedSent": "n 1 nussbaum martha woman human development cambridge university press cambridge 2000", "SentID": 7245 }, { "ParagraphID": 2200, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \\n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \\n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \\n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \\n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \\n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 13 Ibid. \\n 14 Ibid. \\n 15 Ibid. \\n 16 Ibid. \\n 17 Ibid. \\n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \\n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \\n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \\n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \\n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 13 Ibid. \n 14 Ibid. \n 15 Ibid. \n 16 Ibid. \n 17 Ibid. \n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130440,14 +130440,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls?", + "Sentence": "\n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls?", "newParagraph": "n 1 nussbaum martha woman human development cambridge university press cambridge 2000 n 2 mazurana dyan susan mckay girl girl fighting force northern uganda sierra leone mozambique canadian international development agency child protection research fund march 2004 httpwwwichrddcaenglishcommdocpublicationswomengirlsgirlsmain enhtml n 3 un educational scientific cultural organization unesco gender mainstreaming imple mentation framework 2002 httpunesdocunescoorgimages0013001318131854epdf n 4 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 5 unesco op cit n 6 ibid n 7 statistic woman participation peace operation available peacekeeping watch http wwwpeacewomenorgunpkwatchpkindexhtml n 8 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 9 unesco op cit n 10 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchaspuserlistaspparentid10314 n 11 march candida ines smyth maitrayee mukhopadhyay guide genderanalysis framework oxfam press oxford 1999 n 12 unesco op cit n 13 ibid n 14 ibid n 15 ibid n 16 ibid n 17 ibid n 18 httpwww1umneduhumanrtsinstreee4devwhtm n 19 checklist drawn partially un interagency taskforce woman peace security gender checklist peace operation june 2003 n 20 question drawn de watteville nathalie addressing gender issue demobili zation reintegration program world bank washington dc may 2002 httpwwwworldbank orgafrwpswp33pdf n 21 march smyth mukhopadhyay op cit n 22 matrix based ibid", "ProcessedSent": "n 2 mazurana dyan susan mckay girl", "SentID": 7246 }, { "ParagraphID": 2200, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \\n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \\n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \\n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \\n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \\n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 13 Ibid. \\n 14 Ibid. \\n 15 Ibid. \\n 16 Ibid. \\n 17 Ibid. \\n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \\n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \\n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \\n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \\n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 13 Ibid. \n 14 Ibid. \n 15 Ibid. \n 16 Ibid. \n 17 Ibid. \n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130465,7 +130465,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2200, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \\n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \\n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \\n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \\n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \\n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 13 Ibid. \\n 14 Ibid. \\n 15 Ibid. \\n 16 Ibid. \\n 17 Ibid. \\n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \\n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \\n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \\n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \\n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 13 Ibid. \n 14 Ibid. \n 15 Ibid. \n 16 Ibid. \n 17 Ibid. \n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130476,14 +130476,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf.", + "Sentence": "\n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf.", "newParagraph": "n 1 nussbaum martha woman human development cambridge university press cambridge 2000 n 2 mazurana dyan susan mckay girl girl fighting force northern uganda sierra leone mozambique canadian international development agency child protection research fund march 2004 httpwwwichrddcaenglishcommdocpublicationswomengirlsgirlsmain enhtml n 3 un educational scientific cultural organization unesco gender mainstreaming imple mentation framework 2002 httpunesdocunescoorgimages0013001318131854epdf n 4 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 5 unesco op cit n 6 ibid n 7 statistic woman participation peace operation available peacekeeping watch http wwwpeacewomenorgunpkwatchpkindexhtml n 8 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 9 unesco op cit n 10 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchaspuserlistaspparentid10314 n 11 march candida ines smyth maitrayee mukhopadhyay guide genderanalysis framework oxfam press oxford 1999 n 12 unesco op cit n 13 ibid n 14 ibid n 15 ibid n 16 ibid n 17 ibid n 18 httpwww1umneduhumanrtsinstreee4devwhtm n 19 checklist drawn partially un interagency taskforce woman peace security gender checklist peace operation june 2003 n 20 question drawn de watteville nathalie addressing gender issue demobili zation reintegration program world bank washington dc may 2002 httpwwwworldbank orgafrwpswp33pdf n 21 march smyth mukhopadhyay op cit n 22 matrix based ibid", "ProcessedSent": "n 3 un educational scientific cultural organization unesco gender mainstreaming imple mentation framework 2002 httpunesdocunescoorgimages0013001318131854epdf", "SentID": 7248 }, { "ParagraphID": 2200, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \\n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \\n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \\n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \\n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \\n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 13 Ibid. \\n 14 Ibid. \\n 15 Ibid. \\n 16 Ibid. \\n 17 Ibid. \\n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \\n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \\n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \\n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \\n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 13 Ibid. \n 14 Ibid. \n 15 Ibid. \n 16 Ibid. \n 17 Ibid. \n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130494,14 +130494,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm.", + "Sentence": "\n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm.", "newParagraph": "n 1 nussbaum martha woman human development cambridge university press cambridge 2000 n 2 mazurana dyan susan mckay girl girl fighting force northern uganda sierra leone mozambique canadian international development agency child protection research fund march 2004 httpwwwichrddcaenglishcommdocpublicationswomengirlsgirlsmain enhtml n 3 un educational scientific cultural organization unesco gender mainstreaming imple mentation framework 2002 httpunesdocunescoorgimages0013001318131854epdf n 4 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 5 unesco op cit n 6 ibid n 7 statistic woman participation peace operation available peacekeeping watch http wwwpeacewomenorgunpkwatchpkindexhtml n 8 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 9 unesco op cit n 10 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchaspuserlistaspparentid10314 n 11 march candida ines smyth maitrayee mukhopadhyay guide genderanalysis framework oxfam press oxford 1999 n 12 unesco op cit n 13 ibid n 14 ibid n 15 ibid n 16 ibid n 17 ibid n 18 httpwww1umneduhumanrtsinstreee4devwhtm n 19 checklist drawn partially un interagency taskforce woman peace security gender checklist peace operation june 2003 n 20 question drawn de watteville nathalie addressing gender issue demobili zation reintegration program world bank washington dc may 2002 httpwwwworldbank orgafrwpswp33pdf n 21 march smyth mukhopadhyay op cit n 22 matrix based ibid", "ProcessedSent": "n 4 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm", "SentID": 7249 }, { "ParagraphID": 2200, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \\n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \\n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \\n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \\n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \\n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 13 Ibid. \\n 14 Ibid. \\n 15 Ibid. \\n 16 Ibid. \\n 17 Ibid. \\n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \\n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \\n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \\n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \\n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 13 Ibid. \n 14 Ibid. \n 15 Ibid. \n 16 Ibid. \n 17 Ibid. \n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130512,14 +130512,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 5 From UNESCO, op.", + "Sentence": "\n 5 From UNESCO, op.", "newParagraph": "n 1 nussbaum martha woman human development cambridge university press cambridge 2000 n 2 mazurana dyan susan mckay girl girl fighting force northern uganda sierra leone mozambique canadian international development agency child protection research fund march 2004 httpwwwichrddcaenglishcommdocpublicationswomengirlsgirlsmain enhtml n 3 un educational scientific cultural organization unesco gender mainstreaming imple mentation framework 2002 httpunesdocunescoorgimages0013001318131854epdf n 4 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 5 unesco op cit n 6 ibid n 7 statistic woman participation peace operation available peacekeeping watch http wwwpeacewomenorgunpkwatchpkindexhtml n 8 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 9 unesco op cit n 10 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchaspuserlistaspparentid10314 n 11 march candida ines smyth maitrayee mukhopadhyay guide genderanalysis framework oxfam press oxford 1999 n 12 unesco op cit n 13 ibid n 14 ibid n 15 ibid n 16 ibid n 17 ibid n 18 httpwww1umneduhumanrtsinstreee4devwhtm n 19 checklist drawn partially un interagency taskforce woman peace security gender checklist peace operation june 2003 n 20 question drawn de watteville nathalie addressing gender issue demobili zation reintegration program world bank washington dc may 2002 httpwwwworldbank orgafrwpswp33pdf n 21 march smyth mukhopadhyay op cit n 22 matrix based ibid", "ProcessedSent": "n 5 unesco op", "SentID": 7250 }, { "ParagraphID": 2200, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \\n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \\n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \\n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \\n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \\n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 13 Ibid. \\n 14 Ibid. \\n 15 Ibid. \\n 16 Ibid. \\n 17 Ibid. \\n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \\n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \\n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \\n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \\n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 13 Ibid. \n 14 Ibid. \n 15 Ibid. \n 16 Ibid. \n 17 Ibid. \n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130537,7 +130537,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2200, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \\n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \\n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \\n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \\n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \\n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 13 Ibid. \\n 14 Ibid. \\n 15 Ibid. \\n 16 Ibid. \\n 17 Ibid. \\n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \\n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \\n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \\n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \\n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 13 Ibid. \n 14 Ibid. \n 15 Ibid. \n 16 Ibid. \n 17 Ibid. \n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130548,14 +130548,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 6 Ibid.", + "Sentence": "\n 6 Ibid.", "newParagraph": "n 1 nussbaum martha woman human development cambridge university press cambridge 2000 n 2 mazurana dyan susan mckay girl girl fighting force northern uganda sierra leone mozambique canadian international development agency child protection research fund march 2004 httpwwwichrddcaenglishcommdocpublicationswomengirlsgirlsmain enhtml n 3 un educational scientific cultural organization unesco gender mainstreaming imple mentation framework 2002 httpunesdocunescoorgimages0013001318131854epdf n 4 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 5 unesco op cit n 6 ibid n 7 statistic woman participation peace operation available peacekeeping watch http wwwpeacewomenorgunpkwatchpkindexhtml n 8 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 9 unesco op cit n 10 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchaspuserlistaspparentid10314 n 11 march candida ines smyth maitrayee mukhopadhyay guide genderanalysis framework oxfam press oxford 1999 n 12 unesco op cit n 13 ibid n 14 ibid n 15 ibid n 16 ibid n 17 ibid n 18 httpwww1umneduhumanrtsinstreee4devwhtm n 19 checklist drawn partially un interagency taskforce woman peace security gender checklist peace operation june 2003 n 20 question drawn de watteville nathalie addressing gender issue demobili zation reintegration program world bank washington dc may 2002 httpwwwworldbank orgafrwpswp33pdf n 21 march smyth mukhopadhyay op cit n 22 matrix based ibid", "ProcessedSent": "n 6 ibid", "SentID": 7252 }, { "ParagraphID": 2200, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \\n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \\n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \\n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \\n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \\n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 13 Ibid. \\n 14 Ibid. \\n 15 Ibid. \\n 16 Ibid. \\n 17 Ibid. \\n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \\n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \\n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \\n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \\n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 13 Ibid. \n 14 Ibid. \n 15 Ibid. \n 16 Ibid. \n 17 Ibid. \n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130566,14 +130566,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html.", + "Sentence": "\n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html.", "newParagraph": "n 1 nussbaum martha woman human development cambridge university press cambridge 2000 n 2 mazurana dyan susan mckay girl girl fighting force northern uganda sierra leone mozambique canadian international development agency child protection research fund march 2004 httpwwwichrddcaenglishcommdocpublicationswomengirlsgirlsmain enhtml n 3 un educational scientific cultural organization unesco gender mainstreaming imple mentation framework 2002 httpunesdocunescoorgimages0013001318131854epdf n 4 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 5 unesco op cit n 6 ibid n 7 statistic woman participation peace operation available peacekeeping watch http wwwpeacewomenorgunpkwatchpkindexhtml n 8 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 9 unesco op cit n 10 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchaspuserlistaspparentid10314 n 11 march candida ines smyth maitrayee mukhopadhyay guide genderanalysis framework oxfam press oxford 1999 n 12 unesco op cit n 13 ibid n 14 ibid n 15 ibid n 16 ibid n 17 ibid n 18 httpwww1umneduhumanrtsinstreee4devwhtm n 19 checklist drawn partially un interagency taskforce woman peace security gender checklist peace operation june 2003 n 20 question drawn de watteville nathalie addressing gender issue demobili zation reintegration program world bank washington dc may 2002 httpwwwworldbank orgafrwpswp33pdf n 21 march smyth mukhopadhyay op cit n 22 matrix based ibid", "ProcessedSent": "n 7 statistic woman participation peace operation available peacekeeping watch http wwwpeacewomenorgunpkwatchpkindexhtml", "SentID": 7253 }, { "ParagraphID": 2200, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \\n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \\n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \\n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \\n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \\n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 13 Ibid. \\n 14 Ibid. \\n 15 Ibid. \\n 16 Ibid. \\n 17 Ibid. \\n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \\n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \\n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \\n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \\n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 13 Ibid. \n 14 Ibid. \n 15 Ibid. \n 16 Ibid. \n 17 Ibid. \n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130584,14 +130584,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm.", + "Sentence": "\n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm.", "newParagraph": "n 1 nussbaum martha woman human development cambridge university press cambridge 2000 n 2 mazurana dyan susan mckay girl girl fighting force northern uganda sierra leone mozambique canadian international development agency child protection research fund march 2004 httpwwwichrddcaenglishcommdocpublicationswomengirlsgirlsmain enhtml n 3 un educational scientific cultural organization unesco gender mainstreaming imple mentation framework 2002 httpunesdocunescoorgimages0013001318131854epdf n 4 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 5 unesco op cit n 6 ibid n 7 statistic woman participation peace operation available peacekeeping watch http wwwpeacewomenorgunpkwatchpkindexhtml n 8 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 9 unesco op cit n 10 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchaspuserlistaspparentid10314 n 11 march candida ines smyth maitrayee mukhopadhyay guide genderanalysis framework oxfam press oxford 1999 n 12 unesco op cit n 13 ibid n 14 ibid n 15 ibid n 16 ibid n 17 ibid n 18 httpwww1umneduhumanrtsinstreee4devwhtm n 19 checklist drawn partially un interagency taskforce woman peace security gender checklist peace operation june 2003 n 20 question drawn de watteville nathalie addressing gender issue demobili zation reintegration program world bank washington dc may 2002 httpwwwworldbank orgafrwpswp33pdf n 21 march smyth mukhopadhyay op cit n 22 matrix based ibid", "ProcessedSent": "n 8 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm", "SentID": 7254 }, { "ParagraphID": 2200, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \\n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \\n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \\n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \\n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \\n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 13 Ibid. \\n 14 Ibid. \\n 15 Ibid. \\n 16 Ibid. \\n 17 Ibid. \\n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \\n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \\n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \\n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \\n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 13 Ibid. \n 14 Ibid. \n 15 Ibid. \n 16 Ibid. \n 17 Ibid. \n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130602,14 +130602,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 9 From UNESCO, op.", + "Sentence": "\n 9 From UNESCO, op.", "newParagraph": "n 1 nussbaum martha woman human development cambridge university press cambridge 2000 n 2 mazurana dyan susan mckay girl girl fighting force northern uganda sierra leone mozambique canadian international development agency child protection research fund march 2004 httpwwwichrddcaenglishcommdocpublicationswomengirlsgirlsmain enhtml n 3 un educational scientific cultural organization unesco gender mainstreaming imple mentation framework 2002 httpunesdocunescoorgimages0013001318131854epdf n 4 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 5 unesco op cit n 6 ibid n 7 statistic woman participation peace operation available peacekeeping watch http wwwpeacewomenorgunpkwatchpkindexhtml n 8 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 9 unesco op cit n 10 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchaspuserlistaspparentid10314 n 11 march candida ines smyth maitrayee mukhopadhyay guide genderanalysis framework oxfam press oxford 1999 n 12 unesco op cit n 13 ibid n 14 ibid n 15 ibid n 16 ibid n 17 ibid n 18 httpwww1umneduhumanrtsinstreee4devwhtm n 19 checklist drawn partially un interagency taskforce woman peace security gender checklist peace operation june 2003 n 20 question drawn de watteville nathalie addressing gender issue demobili zation reintegration program world bank washington dc may 2002 httpwwwworldbank orgafrwpswp33pdf n 21 march smyth mukhopadhyay op cit n 22 matrix based ibid", "ProcessedSent": "n 9 unesco op", "SentID": 7255 }, { "ParagraphID": 2200, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \\n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \\n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \\n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \\n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \\n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 13 Ibid. \\n 14 Ibid. \\n 15 Ibid. \\n 16 Ibid. \\n 17 Ibid. \\n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \\n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \\n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \\n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \\n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 13 Ibid. \n 14 Ibid. \n 15 Ibid. \n 16 Ibid. \n 17 Ibid. \n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130627,7 +130627,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2200, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \\n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \\n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \\n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \\n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \\n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 13 Ibid. \\n 14 Ibid. \\n 15 Ibid. \\n 16 Ibid. \\n 17 Ibid. \\n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \\n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \\n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \\n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \\n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 13 Ibid. \n 14 Ibid. \n 15 Ibid. \n 16 Ibid. \n 17 Ibid. \n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130638,14 +130638,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314.", + "Sentence": "\n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314.", "newParagraph": "n 1 nussbaum martha woman human development cambridge university press cambridge 2000 n 2 mazurana dyan susan mckay girl girl fighting force northern uganda sierra leone mozambique canadian international development agency child protection research fund march 2004 httpwwwichrddcaenglishcommdocpublicationswomengirlsgirlsmain enhtml n 3 un educational scientific cultural organization unesco gender mainstreaming imple mentation framework 2002 httpunesdocunescoorgimages0013001318131854epdf n 4 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 5 unesco op cit n 6 ibid n 7 statistic woman participation peace operation available peacekeeping watch http wwwpeacewomenorgunpkwatchpkindexhtml n 8 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 9 unesco op cit n 10 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchaspuserlistaspparentid10314 n 11 march candida ines smyth maitrayee mukhopadhyay guide genderanalysis framework oxfam press oxford 1999 n 12 unesco op cit n 13 ibid n 14 ibid n 15 ibid n 16 ibid n 17 ibid n 18 httpwww1umneduhumanrtsinstreee4devwhtm n 19 checklist drawn partially un interagency taskforce woman peace security gender checklist peace operation june 2003 n 20 question drawn de watteville nathalie addressing gender issue demobili zation reintegration program world bank washington dc may 2002 httpwwwworldbank orgafrwpswp33pdf n 21 march smyth mukhopadhyay op cit n 22 matrix based ibid", "ProcessedSent": "n 10 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchaspuserlistaspparentid10314", "SentID": 7257 }, { "ParagraphID": 2200, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \\n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \\n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \\n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \\n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \\n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 13 Ibid. \\n 14 Ibid. \\n 15 Ibid. \\n 16 Ibid. \\n 17 Ibid. \\n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \\n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \\n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \\n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \\n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 13 Ibid. \n 14 Ibid. \n 15 Ibid. \n 16 Ibid. \n 17 Ibid. \n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130656,14 +130656,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999.", + "Sentence": "\n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999.", "newParagraph": "n 1 nussbaum martha woman human development cambridge university press cambridge 2000 n 2 mazurana dyan susan mckay girl girl fighting force northern uganda sierra leone mozambique canadian international development agency child protection research fund march 2004 httpwwwichrddcaenglishcommdocpublicationswomengirlsgirlsmain enhtml n 3 un educational scientific cultural organization unesco gender mainstreaming imple mentation framework 2002 httpunesdocunescoorgimages0013001318131854epdf n 4 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 5 unesco op cit n 6 ibid n 7 statistic woman participation peace operation available peacekeeping watch http wwwpeacewomenorgunpkwatchpkindexhtml n 8 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 9 unesco op cit n 10 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchaspuserlistaspparentid10314 n 11 march candida ines smyth maitrayee mukhopadhyay guide genderanalysis framework oxfam press oxford 1999 n 12 unesco op cit n 13 ibid n 14 ibid n 15 ibid n 16 ibid n 17 ibid n 18 httpwww1umneduhumanrtsinstreee4devwhtm n 19 checklist drawn partially un interagency taskforce woman peace security gender checklist peace operation june 2003 n 20 question drawn de watteville nathalie addressing gender issue demobili zation reintegration program world bank washington dc may 2002 httpwwwworldbank orgafrwpswp33pdf n 21 march smyth mukhopadhyay op cit n 22 matrix based ibid", "ProcessedSent": "n 11 march candida ines smyth maitrayee mukhopadhyay guide genderanalysis framework oxfam press oxford 1999", "SentID": 7258 }, { "ParagraphID": 2200, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \\n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \\n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \\n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \\n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \\n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 13 Ibid. \\n 14 Ibid. \\n 15 Ibid. \\n 16 Ibid. \\n 17 Ibid. \\n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \\n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \\n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \\n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \\n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 13 Ibid. \n 14 Ibid. \n 15 Ibid. \n 16 Ibid. \n 17 Ibid. \n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130674,14 +130674,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 12 From UNESCO, op.", + "Sentence": "\n 12 From UNESCO, op.", "newParagraph": "n 1 nussbaum martha woman human development cambridge university press cambridge 2000 n 2 mazurana dyan susan mckay girl girl fighting force northern uganda sierra leone mozambique canadian international development agency child protection research fund march 2004 httpwwwichrddcaenglishcommdocpublicationswomengirlsgirlsmain enhtml n 3 un educational scientific cultural organization unesco gender mainstreaming imple mentation framework 2002 httpunesdocunescoorgimages0013001318131854epdf n 4 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 5 unesco op cit n 6 ibid n 7 statistic woman participation peace operation available peacekeeping watch http wwwpeacewomenorgunpkwatchpkindexhtml n 8 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 9 unesco op cit n 10 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchaspuserlistaspparentid10314 n 11 march candida ines smyth maitrayee mukhopadhyay guide genderanalysis framework oxfam press oxford 1999 n 12 unesco op cit n 13 ibid n 14 ibid n 15 ibid n 16 ibid n 17 ibid n 18 httpwww1umneduhumanrtsinstreee4devwhtm n 19 checklist drawn partially un interagency taskforce woman peace security gender checklist peace operation june 2003 n 20 question drawn de watteville nathalie addressing gender issue demobili zation reintegration program world bank washington dc may 2002 httpwwwworldbank orgafrwpswp33pdf n 21 march smyth mukhopadhyay op cit n 22 matrix based ibid", "ProcessedSent": "n 12 unesco op", "SentID": 7259 }, { "ParagraphID": 2200, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \\n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \\n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \\n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \\n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \\n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 13 Ibid. \\n 14 Ibid. \\n 15 Ibid. \\n 16 Ibid. \\n 17 Ibid. \\n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \\n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \\n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \\n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \\n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 13 Ibid. \n 14 Ibid. \n 15 Ibid. \n 16 Ibid. \n 17 Ibid. \n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130699,7 +130699,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2200, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \\n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \\n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \\n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \\n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \\n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 13 Ibid. \\n 14 Ibid. \\n 15 Ibid. \\n 16 Ibid. \\n 17 Ibid. \\n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \\n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \\n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \\n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \\n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 13 Ibid. \n 14 Ibid. \n 15 Ibid. \n 16 Ibid. \n 17 Ibid. \n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130710,14 +130710,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 13 Ibid.", + "Sentence": "\n 13 Ibid.", "newParagraph": "n 1 nussbaum martha woman human development cambridge university press cambridge 2000 n 2 mazurana dyan susan mckay girl girl fighting force northern uganda sierra leone mozambique canadian international development agency child protection research fund march 2004 httpwwwichrddcaenglishcommdocpublicationswomengirlsgirlsmain enhtml n 3 un educational scientific cultural organization unesco gender mainstreaming imple mentation framework 2002 httpunesdocunescoorgimages0013001318131854epdf n 4 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 5 unesco op cit n 6 ibid n 7 statistic woman participation peace operation available peacekeeping watch http wwwpeacewomenorgunpkwatchpkindexhtml n 8 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 9 unesco op cit n 10 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchaspuserlistaspparentid10314 n 11 march candida ines smyth maitrayee mukhopadhyay guide genderanalysis framework oxfam press oxford 1999 n 12 unesco op cit n 13 ibid n 14 ibid n 15 ibid n 16 ibid n 17 ibid n 18 httpwww1umneduhumanrtsinstreee4devwhtm n 19 checklist drawn partially un interagency taskforce woman peace security gender checklist peace operation june 2003 n 20 question drawn de watteville nathalie addressing gender issue demobili zation reintegration program world bank washington dc may 2002 httpwwwworldbank orgafrwpswp33pdf n 21 march smyth mukhopadhyay op cit n 22 matrix based ibid", "ProcessedSent": "n 13 ibid", "SentID": 7261 }, { "ParagraphID": 2200, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \\n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \\n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \\n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \\n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \\n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 13 Ibid. \\n 14 Ibid. \\n 15 Ibid. \\n 16 Ibid. \\n 17 Ibid. \\n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \\n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \\n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \\n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \\n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 13 Ibid. \n 14 Ibid. \n 15 Ibid. \n 16 Ibid. \n 17 Ibid. \n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130728,14 +130728,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 14 Ibid.", + "Sentence": "\n 14 Ibid.", "newParagraph": "n 1 nussbaum martha woman human development cambridge university press cambridge 2000 n 2 mazurana dyan susan mckay girl girl fighting force northern uganda sierra leone mozambique canadian international development agency child protection research fund march 2004 httpwwwichrddcaenglishcommdocpublicationswomengirlsgirlsmain enhtml n 3 un educational scientific cultural organization unesco gender mainstreaming imple mentation framework 2002 httpunesdocunescoorgimages0013001318131854epdf n 4 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 5 unesco op cit n 6 ibid n 7 statistic woman participation peace operation available peacekeeping watch http wwwpeacewomenorgunpkwatchpkindexhtml n 8 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 9 unesco op cit n 10 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchaspuserlistaspparentid10314 n 11 march candida ines smyth maitrayee mukhopadhyay guide genderanalysis framework oxfam press oxford 1999 n 12 unesco op cit n 13 ibid n 14 ibid n 15 ibid n 16 ibid n 17 ibid n 18 httpwww1umneduhumanrtsinstreee4devwhtm n 19 checklist drawn partially un interagency taskforce woman peace security gender checklist peace operation june 2003 n 20 question drawn de watteville nathalie addressing gender issue demobili zation reintegration program world bank washington dc may 2002 httpwwwworldbank orgafrwpswp33pdf n 21 march smyth mukhopadhyay op cit n 22 matrix based ibid", "ProcessedSent": "n 14 ibid", "SentID": 7262 }, { "ParagraphID": 2200, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \\n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \\n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \\n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \\n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \\n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 13 Ibid. \\n 14 Ibid. \\n 15 Ibid. \\n 16 Ibid. \\n 17 Ibid. \\n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \\n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \\n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \\n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \\n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 13 Ibid. \n 14 Ibid. \n 15 Ibid. \n 16 Ibid. \n 17 Ibid. \n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130746,14 +130746,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 15 Ibid.", + "Sentence": "\n 15 Ibid.", "newParagraph": "n 1 nussbaum martha woman human development cambridge university press cambridge 2000 n 2 mazurana dyan susan mckay girl girl fighting force northern uganda sierra leone mozambique canadian international development agency child protection research fund march 2004 httpwwwichrddcaenglishcommdocpublicationswomengirlsgirlsmain enhtml n 3 un educational scientific cultural organization unesco gender mainstreaming imple mentation framework 2002 httpunesdocunescoorgimages0013001318131854epdf n 4 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 5 unesco op cit n 6 ibid n 7 statistic woman participation peace operation available peacekeeping watch http wwwpeacewomenorgunpkwatchpkindexhtml n 8 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 9 unesco op cit n 10 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchaspuserlistaspparentid10314 n 11 march candida ines smyth maitrayee mukhopadhyay guide genderanalysis framework oxfam press oxford 1999 n 12 unesco op cit n 13 ibid n 14 ibid n 15 ibid n 16 ibid n 17 ibid n 18 httpwww1umneduhumanrtsinstreee4devwhtm n 19 checklist drawn partially un interagency taskforce woman peace security gender checklist peace operation june 2003 n 20 question drawn de watteville nathalie addressing gender issue demobili zation reintegration program world bank washington dc may 2002 httpwwwworldbank orgafrwpswp33pdf n 21 march smyth mukhopadhyay op cit n 22 matrix based ibid", "ProcessedSent": "n 15 ibid", "SentID": 7263 }, { "ParagraphID": 2200, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \\n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \\n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \\n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \\n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \\n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 13 Ibid. \\n 14 Ibid. \\n 15 Ibid. \\n 16 Ibid. \\n 17 Ibid. \\n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \\n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \\n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \\n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \\n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 13 Ibid. \n 14 Ibid. \n 15 Ibid. \n 16 Ibid. \n 17 Ibid. \n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130764,14 +130764,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 16 Ibid.", + "Sentence": "\n 16 Ibid.", "newParagraph": "n 1 nussbaum martha woman human development cambridge university press cambridge 2000 n 2 mazurana dyan susan mckay girl girl fighting force northern uganda sierra leone mozambique canadian international development agency child protection research fund march 2004 httpwwwichrddcaenglishcommdocpublicationswomengirlsgirlsmain enhtml n 3 un educational scientific cultural organization unesco gender mainstreaming imple mentation framework 2002 httpunesdocunescoorgimages0013001318131854epdf n 4 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 5 unesco op cit n 6 ibid n 7 statistic woman participation peace operation available peacekeeping watch http wwwpeacewomenorgunpkwatchpkindexhtml n 8 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 9 unesco op cit n 10 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchaspuserlistaspparentid10314 n 11 march candida ines smyth maitrayee mukhopadhyay guide genderanalysis framework oxfam press oxford 1999 n 12 unesco op cit n 13 ibid n 14 ibid n 15 ibid n 16 ibid n 17 ibid n 18 httpwww1umneduhumanrtsinstreee4devwhtm n 19 checklist drawn partially un interagency taskforce woman peace security gender checklist peace operation june 2003 n 20 question drawn de watteville nathalie addressing gender issue demobili zation reintegration program world bank washington dc may 2002 httpwwwworldbank orgafrwpswp33pdf n 21 march smyth mukhopadhyay op cit n 22 matrix based ibid", "ProcessedSent": "n 16 ibid", "SentID": 7264 }, { "ParagraphID": 2200, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \\n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \\n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \\n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \\n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \\n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 13 Ibid. \\n 14 Ibid. \\n 15 Ibid. \\n 16 Ibid. \\n 17 Ibid. \\n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \\n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \\n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \\n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \\n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 13 Ibid. \n 14 Ibid. \n 15 Ibid. \n 16 Ibid. \n 17 Ibid. \n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130782,14 +130782,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 17 Ibid.", + "Sentence": "\n 17 Ibid.", "newParagraph": "n 1 nussbaum martha woman human development cambridge university press cambridge 2000 n 2 mazurana dyan susan mckay girl girl fighting force northern uganda sierra leone mozambique canadian international development agency child protection research fund march 2004 httpwwwichrddcaenglishcommdocpublicationswomengirlsgirlsmain enhtml n 3 un educational scientific cultural organization unesco gender mainstreaming imple mentation framework 2002 httpunesdocunescoorgimages0013001318131854epdf n 4 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 5 unesco op cit n 6 ibid n 7 statistic woman participation peace operation available peacekeeping watch http wwwpeacewomenorgunpkwatchpkindexhtml n 8 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 9 unesco op cit n 10 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchaspuserlistaspparentid10314 n 11 march candida ines smyth maitrayee mukhopadhyay guide genderanalysis framework oxfam press oxford 1999 n 12 unesco op cit n 13 ibid n 14 ibid n 15 ibid n 16 ibid n 17 ibid n 18 httpwww1umneduhumanrtsinstreee4devwhtm n 19 checklist drawn partially un interagency taskforce woman peace security gender checklist peace operation june 2003 n 20 question drawn de watteville nathalie addressing gender issue demobili zation reintegration program world bank washington dc may 2002 httpwwwworldbank orgafrwpswp33pdf n 21 march smyth mukhopadhyay op cit n 22 matrix based ibid", "ProcessedSent": "n 17 ibid", "SentID": 7265 }, { "ParagraphID": 2200, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \\n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \\n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \\n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \\n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \\n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 13 Ibid. \\n 14 Ibid. \\n 15 Ibid. \\n 16 Ibid. \\n 17 Ibid. \\n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \\n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \\n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \\n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \\n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 13 Ibid. \n 14 Ibid. \n 15 Ibid. \n 16 Ibid. \n 17 Ibid. \n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130800,14 +130800,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm.", + "Sentence": "\n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm.", "newParagraph": "n 1 nussbaum martha woman human development cambridge university press cambridge 2000 n 2 mazurana dyan susan mckay girl girl fighting force northern uganda sierra leone mozambique canadian international development agency child protection research fund march 2004 httpwwwichrddcaenglishcommdocpublicationswomengirlsgirlsmain enhtml n 3 un educational scientific cultural organization unesco gender mainstreaming imple mentation framework 2002 httpunesdocunescoorgimages0013001318131854epdf n 4 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 5 unesco op cit n 6 ibid n 7 statistic woman participation peace operation available peacekeeping watch http wwwpeacewomenorgunpkwatchpkindexhtml n 8 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 9 unesco op cit n 10 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchaspuserlistaspparentid10314 n 11 march candida ines smyth maitrayee mukhopadhyay guide genderanalysis framework oxfam press oxford 1999 n 12 unesco op cit n 13 ibid n 14 ibid n 15 ibid n 16 ibid n 17 ibid n 18 httpwww1umneduhumanrtsinstreee4devwhtm n 19 checklist drawn partially un interagency taskforce woman peace security gender checklist peace operation june 2003 n 20 question drawn de watteville nathalie addressing gender issue demobili zation reintegration program world bank washington dc may 2002 httpwwwworldbank orgafrwpswp33pdf n 21 march smyth mukhopadhyay op cit n 22 matrix based ibid", "ProcessedSent": "n 18 httpwww1umneduhumanrtsinstreee4devwhtm", "SentID": 7266 }, { "ParagraphID": 2200, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \\n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \\n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \\n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \\n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \\n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 13 Ibid. \\n 14 Ibid. \\n 15 Ibid. \\n 16 Ibid. \\n 17 Ibid. \\n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \\n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \\n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \\n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \\n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 13 Ibid. \n 14 Ibid. \n 15 Ibid. \n 16 Ibid. \n 17 Ibid. \n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130818,14 +130818,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003.", + "Sentence": "\n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003.", "newParagraph": "n 1 nussbaum martha woman human development cambridge university press cambridge 2000 n 2 mazurana dyan susan mckay girl girl fighting force northern uganda sierra leone mozambique canadian international development agency child protection research fund march 2004 httpwwwichrddcaenglishcommdocpublicationswomengirlsgirlsmain enhtml n 3 un educational scientific cultural organization unesco gender mainstreaming imple mentation framework 2002 httpunesdocunescoorgimages0013001318131854epdf n 4 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 5 unesco op cit n 6 ibid n 7 statistic woman participation peace operation available peacekeeping watch http wwwpeacewomenorgunpkwatchpkindexhtml n 8 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 9 unesco op cit n 10 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchaspuserlistaspparentid10314 n 11 march candida ines smyth maitrayee mukhopadhyay guide genderanalysis framework oxfam press oxford 1999 n 12 unesco op cit n 13 ibid n 14 ibid n 15 ibid n 16 ibid n 17 ibid n 18 httpwww1umneduhumanrtsinstreee4devwhtm n 19 checklist drawn partially un interagency taskforce woman peace security gender checklist peace operation june 2003 n 20 question drawn de watteville nathalie addressing gender issue demobili zation reintegration program world bank washington dc may 2002 httpwwwworldbank orgafrwpswp33pdf n 21 march smyth mukhopadhyay op cit n 22 matrix based ibid", "ProcessedSent": "n 19 checklist drawn partially un interagency taskforce woman peace security gender checklist peace operation june 2003", "SentID": 7267 }, { "ParagraphID": 2200, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \\n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \\n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \\n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \\n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \\n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 13 Ibid. \\n 14 Ibid. \\n 15 Ibid. \\n 16 Ibid. \\n 17 Ibid. \\n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \\n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \\n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \\n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \\n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 13 Ibid. \n 14 Ibid. \n 15 Ibid. \n 16 Ibid. \n 17 Ibid. \n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130836,14 +130836,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank.", + "Sentence": "\n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank.", "newParagraph": "n 1 nussbaum martha woman human development cambridge university press cambridge 2000 n 2 mazurana dyan susan mckay girl girl fighting force northern uganda sierra leone mozambique canadian international development agency child protection research fund march 2004 httpwwwichrddcaenglishcommdocpublicationswomengirlsgirlsmain enhtml n 3 un educational scientific cultural organization unesco gender mainstreaming imple mentation framework 2002 httpunesdocunescoorgimages0013001318131854epdf n 4 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 5 unesco op cit n 6 ibid n 7 statistic woman participation peace operation available peacekeeping watch http wwwpeacewomenorgunpkwatchpkindexhtml n 8 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 9 unesco op cit n 10 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchaspuserlistaspparentid10314 n 11 march candida ines smyth maitrayee mukhopadhyay guide genderanalysis framework oxfam press oxford 1999 n 12 unesco op cit n 13 ibid n 14 ibid n 15 ibid n 16 ibid n 17 ibid n 18 httpwww1umneduhumanrtsinstreee4devwhtm n 19 checklist drawn partially un interagency taskforce woman peace security gender checklist peace operation june 2003 n 20 question drawn de watteville nathalie addressing gender issue demobili zation reintegration program world bank washington dc may 2002 httpwwwworldbank orgafrwpswp33pdf n 21 march smyth mukhopadhyay op cit n 22 matrix based ibid", "ProcessedSent": "n 20 question drawn de watteville nathalie addressing gender issue demobili zation reintegration program world bank washington dc may 2002 httpwwwworldbank", "SentID": 7268 }, { "ParagraphID": 2200, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \\n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \\n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \\n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \\n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \\n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 13 Ibid. \\n 14 Ibid. \\n 15 Ibid. \\n 16 Ibid. \\n 17 Ibid. \\n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \\n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \\n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \\n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \\n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 13 Ibid. \n 14 Ibid. \n 15 Ibid. \n 16 Ibid. \n 17 Ibid. \n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130861,7 +130861,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2200, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \\n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \\n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \\n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \\n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \\n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 13 Ibid. \\n 14 Ibid. \\n 15 Ibid. \\n 16 Ibid. \\n 17 Ibid. \\n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \\n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \\n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \\n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \\n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 13 Ibid. \n 14 Ibid. \n 15 Ibid. \n 16 Ibid. \n 17 Ibid. \n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130872,14 +130872,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op.", + "Sentence": "\n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op.", "newParagraph": "n 1 nussbaum martha woman human development cambridge university press cambridge 2000 n 2 mazurana dyan susan mckay girl girl fighting force northern uganda sierra leone mozambique canadian international development agency child protection research fund march 2004 httpwwwichrddcaenglishcommdocpublicationswomengirlsgirlsmain enhtml n 3 un educational scientific cultural organization unesco gender mainstreaming imple mentation framework 2002 httpunesdocunescoorgimages0013001318131854epdf n 4 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 5 unesco op cit n 6 ibid n 7 statistic woman participation peace operation available peacekeeping watch http wwwpeacewomenorgunpkwatchpkindexhtml n 8 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 9 unesco op cit n 10 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchaspuserlistaspparentid10314 n 11 march candida ines smyth maitrayee mukhopadhyay guide genderanalysis framework oxfam press oxford 1999 n 12 unesco op cit n 13 ibid n 14 ibid n 15 ibid n 16 ibid n 17 ibid n 18 httpwww1umneduhumanrtsinstreee4devwhtm n 19 checklist drawn partially un interagency taskforce woman peace security gender checklist peace operation june 2003 n 20 question drawn de watteville nathalie addressing gender issue demobili zation reintegration program world bank washington dc may 2002 httpwwwworldbank orgafrwpswp33pdf n 21 march smyth mukhopadhyay op cit n 22 matrix based ibid", "ProcessedSent": "n 21 march smyth mukhopadhyay op", "SentID": 7270 }, { "ParagraphID": 2200, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \\n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \\n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \\n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \\n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \\n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 13 Ibid. \\n 14 Ibid. \\n 15 Ibid. \\n 16 Ibid. \\n 17 Ibid. \\n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \\n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \\n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \\n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \\n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 13 Ibid. \n 14 Ibid. \n 15 Ibid. \n 16 Ibid. \n 17 Ibid. \n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130897,7 +130897,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2200, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \\n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \\n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \\n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \\n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \\n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \\n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \\n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \\n 13 Ibid. \\n 14 Ibid. \\n 15 Ibid. \\n 16 Ibid. \\n 17 Ibid. \\n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \\n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \\n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \\n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \\n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. \n 2 Mazurana, Dyan and Susan McKay, Where Are the Girls? Girls in Fighting Forces in Northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique\u2019, Canadian International Development Agency, Child Protection Research Fund, March 2004, http:\/\/www.ichrdd.ca\/english\/commdoc\/publications\/women\/Girls\/girlsmain EN.html. \n 3 From UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Gender Mainstreaming Imple- mentation Framework, 2002, http:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/images\/0013\/001318\/131854e.pdf. \n 4 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 5 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Statistics on women\u2019s participation in peace operations available at \u2018Peacekeeping Watch\u2019, http:\/\/ www.peacewomen.org\/un\/pkwatch\/pkindex.html. \n 8 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/osagi\/conceptsandefinitions.htm. \n 9 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 10 http:\/\/www.un.org\/womenwatch\/asp\/user\/list.asp?ParentID=10314. \n 11 March, Candida, Ines Smyth and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, A Guide to Gender-analysis Frameworks, Oxfam Press, Oxford, 1999. \n 12 From UNESCO, op. cit. \n 13 Ibid. \n 14 Ibid. \n 15 Ibid. \n 16 Ibid. \n 17 Ibid. \n 18 http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/humanrts\/instree\/e4devw.htm. \n 19 This checklist is drawn partially from UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on Women, Peace and Security, Gender Checklist for Peace Operations, June 2003. \n 20 Some of the questions are drawn from De Watteville, Nathalie, Addressing Gender Issues in Demobili- zation and Reintegration Programs, World Bank, Washington, DC, May 2002, http:\/\/www.worldbank. org\/afr\/wps\/wp33.pdf. \n 21 March, Smyth and Mukhopadhyay, op. cit. \n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -130908,7 +130908,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", + "Sentence": "\n 22 This matrix is based on ibid.", "newParagraph": "n 1 nussbaum martha woman human development cambridge university press cambridge 2000 n 2 mazurana dyan susan mckay girl girl fighting force northern uganda sierra leone mozambique canadian international development agency child protection research fund march 2004 httpwwwichrddcaenglishcommdocpublicationswomengirlsgirlsmain enhtml n 3 un educational scientific cultural organization unesco gender mainstreaming imple mentation framework 2002 httpunesdocunescoorgimages0013001318131854epdf n 4 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 5 unesco op cit n 6 ibid n 7 statistic woman participation peace operation available peacekeeping watch http wwwpeacewomenorgunpkwatchpkindexhtml n 8 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchosagiconceptsandefinitionshtm n 9 unesco op cit n 10 httpwwwunorgwomenwatchaspuserlistaspparentid10314 n 11 march candida ines smyth maitrayee mukhopadhyay guide genderanalysis framework oxfam press oxford 1999 n 12 unesco op cit n 13 ibid n 14 ibid n 15 ibid n 16 ibid n 17 ibid n 18 httpwww1umneduhumanrtsinstreee4devwhtm n 19 checklist drawn partially un interagency taskforce woman peace security gender checklist peace operation june 2003 n 20 question drawn de watteville nathalie addressing gender issue demobili zation reintegration program world bank washington dc may 2002 httpwwwworldbank orgafrwpswp33pdf n 21 march smyth mukhopadhyay op cit n 22 matrix based ibid", "ProcessedSent": "n 22 matrix based ibid", "SentID": 7272 @@ -131275,7 +131275,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2206, - "Paragraph": "This module aims to provide DDR practitioners and child protection actors with guidance on the planning, design and implementation of DDR processes for CAAFAG in both mission and non- mission settings. The main objectives of this guidance are: \\n To set out the main principles that guide all aspects of DDR processes for children. \\n To outline the normative legal framework that applies to children and must be integrated across DDR processes for children through planning, design, implementation and monitoring and evaluation. \\n To provide guidance and key considerations to drive continuous efforts to prevent the recruitment and re-recruitment of children into armed forces and groups. \\n To provide guidance on child- and gender-sensitive approaches to DDR highlighting the importance of both individualized and community-based approaches. \\n To highlight international norms and standards around criminal responsibility and accountability in relation to CAAFAG.", + "Paragraph": "This module aims to provide DDR practitioners and child protection actors with guidance on the planning, design and implementation of DDR processes for CAAFAG in both mission and non- mission settings. The main objectives of this guidance are: \n To set out the main principles that guide all aspects of DDR processes for children. \n To outline the normative legal framework that applies to children and must be integrated across DDR processes for children through planning, design, implementation and monitoring and evaluation. \n To provide guidance and key considerations to drive continuous efforts to prevent the recruitment and re-recruitment of children into armed forces and groups. \n To provide guidance on child- and gender-sensitive approaches to DDR highlighting the importance of both individualized and community-based approaches. \n To highlight international norms and standards around criminal responsibility and accountability in relation to CAAFAG.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -131293,7 +131293,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2206, - "Paragraph": "This module aims to provide DDR practitioners and child protection actors with guidance on the planning, design and implementation of DDR processes for CAAFAG in both mission and non- mission settings. The main objectives of this guidance are: \\n To set out the main principles that guide all aspects of DDR processes for children. \\n To outline the normative legal framework that applies to children and must be integrated across DDR processes for children through planning, design, implementation and monitoring and evaluation. \\n To provide guidance and key considerations to drive continuous efforts to prevent the recruitment and re-recruitment of children into armed forces and groups. \\n To provide guidance on child- and gender-sensitive approaches to DDR highlighting the importance of both individualized and community-based approaches. \\n To highlight international norms and standards around criminal responsibility and accountability in relation to CAAFAG.", + "Paragraph": "This module aims to provide DDR practitioners and child protection actors with guidance on the planning, design and implementation of DDR processes for CAAFAG in both mission and non- mission settings. The main objectives of this guidance are: \n To set out the main principles that guide all aspects of DDR processes for children. \n To outline the normative legal framework that applies to children and must be integrated across DDR processes for children through planning, design, implementation and monitoring and evaluation. \n To provide guidance and key considerations to drive continuous efforts to prevent the recruitment and re-recruitment of children into armed forces and groups. \n To provide guidance on child- and gender-sensitive approaches to DDR highlighting the importance of both individualized and community-based approaches. \n To highlight international norms and standards around criminal responsibility and accountability in relation to CAAFAG.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -131304,14 +131304,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The main objectives of this guidance are: \\n To set out the main principles that guide all aspects of DDR processes for children.", + "Sentence": "The main objectives of this guidance are: \n To set out the main principles that guide all aspects of DDR processes for children.", "newParagraph": "module aim provide ddr practitioner child protection actor guidance planning design implementation ddr process caafag mission non mission setting main objective guidance n set main principle guide aspect ddr process child n outline normative legal framework applies child must integrated across ddr process child planning design implementation monitoring evaluation n provide guidance key consideration drive continuous effort prevent recruitment rerecruitment child armed force group n provide guidance child gendersensitive approach ddr highlighting importance individualized communitybased approach n highlight international norm standard around criminal responsibility accountability relation caafag", "ProcessedSent": "main objective guidance n set main principle guide aspect ddr process child", "SentID": 7294 }, { "ParagraphID": 2206, - "Paragraph": "This module aims to provide DDR practitioners and child protection actors with guidance on the planning, design and implementation of DDR processes for CAAFAG in both mission and non- mission settings. The main objectives of this guidance are: \\n To set out the main principles that guide all aspects of DDR processes for children. \\n To outline the normative legal framework that applies to children and must be integrated across DDR processes for children through planning, design, implementation and monitoring and evaluation. \\n To provide guidance and key considerations to drive continuous efforts to prevent the recruitment and re-recruitment of children into armed forces and groups. \\n To provide guidance on child- and gender-sensitive approaches to DDR highlighting the importance of both individualized and community-based approaches. \\n To highlight international norms and standards around criminal responsibility and accountability in relation to CAAFAG.", + "Paragraph": "This module aims to provide DDR practitioners and child protection actors with guidance on the planning, design and implementation of DDR processes for CAAFAG in both mission and non- mission settings. The main objectives of this guidance are: \n To set out the main principles that guide all aspects of DDR processes for children. \n To outline the normative legal framework that applies to children and must be integrated across DDR processes for children through planning, design, implementation and monitoring and evaluation. \n To provide guidance and key considerations to drive continuous efforts to prevent the recruitment and re-recruitment of children into armed forces and groups. \n To provide guidance on child- and gender-sensitive approaches to DDR highlighting the importance of both individualized and community-based approaches. \n To highlight international norms and standards around criminal responsibility and accountability in relation to CAAFAG.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -131322,14 +131322,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n To outline the normative legal framework that applies to children and must be integrated across DDR processes for children through planning, design, implementation and monitoring and evaluation.", + "Sentence": "\n To outline the normative legal framework that applies to children and must be integrated across DDR processes for children through planning, design, implementation and monitoring and evaluation.", "newParagraph": "module aim provide ddr practitioner child protection actor guidance planning design implementation ddr process caafag mission non mission setting main objective guidance n set main principle guide aspect ddr process child n outline normative legal framework applies child must integrated across ddr process child planning design implementation monitoring evaluation n provide guidance key consideration drive continuous effort prevent recruitment rerecruitment child armed force group n provide guidance child gendersensitive approach ddr highlighting importance individualized communitybased approach n highlight international norm standard around criminal responsibility accountability relation caafag", "ProcessedSent": "n outline normative legal framework applies child must integrated across ddr process child planning design implementation monitoring evaluation", "SentID": 7295 }, { "ParagraphID": 2206, - "Paragraph": "This module aims to provide DDR practitioners and child protection actors with guidance on the planning, design and implementation of DDR processes for CAAFAG in both mission and non- mission settings. The main objectives of this guidance are: \\n To set out the main principles that guide all aspects of DDR processes for children. \\n To outline the normative legal framework that applies to children and must be integrated across DDR processes for children through planning, design, implementation and monitoring and evaluation. \\n To provide guidance and key considerations to drive continuous efforts to prevent the recruitment and re-recruitment of children into armed forces and groups. \\n To provide guidance on child- and gender-sensitive approaches to DDR highlighting the importance of both individualized and community-based approaches. \\n To highlight international norms and standards around criminal responsibility and accountability in relation to CAAFAG.", + "Paragraph": "This module aims to provide DDR practitioners and child protection actors with guidance on the planning, design and implementation of DDR processes for CAAFAG in both mission and non- mission settings. The main objectives of this guidance are: \n To set out the main principles that guide all aspects of DDR processes for children. \n To outline the normative legal framework that applies to children and must be integrated across DDR processes for children through planning, design, implementation and monitoring and evaluation. \n To provide guidance and key considerations to drive continuous efforts to prevent the recruitment and re-recruitment of children into armed forces and groups. \n To provide guidance on child- and gender-sensitive approaches to DDR highlighting the importance of both individualized and community-based approaches. \n To highlight international norms and standards around criminal responsibility and accountability in relation to CAAFAG.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -131340,14 +131340,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n To provide guidance and key considerations to drive continuous efforts to prevent the recruitment and re-recruitment of children into armed forces and groups.", + "Sentence": "\n To provide guidance and key considerations to drive continuous efforts to prevent the recruitment and re-recruitment of children into armed forces and groups.", "newParagraph": "module aim provide ddr practitioner child protection actor guidance planning design implementation ddr process caafag mission non mission setting main objective guidance n set main principle guide aspect ddr process child n outline normative legal framework applies child must integrated across ddr process child planning design implementation monitoring evaluation n provide guidance key consideration drive continuous effort prevent recruitment rerecruitment child armed force group n provide guidance child gendersensitive approach ddr highlighting importance individualized communitybased approach n highlight international norm standard around criminal responsibility accountability relation caafag", "ProcessedSent": "n provide guidance key consideration drive continuous effort prevent recruitment rerecruitment child armed force group", "SentID": 7296 }, { "ParagraphID": 2206, - "Paragraph": "This module aims to provide DDR practitioners and child protection actors with guidance on the planning, design and implementation of DDR processes for CAAFAG in both mission and non- mission settings. The main objectives of this guidance are: \\n To set out the main principles that guide all aspects of DDR processes for children. \\n To outline the normative legal framework that applies to children and must be integrated across DDR processes for children through planning, design, implementation and monitoring and evaluation. \\n To provide guidance and key considerations to drive continuous efforts to prevent the recruitment and re-recruitment of children into armed forces and groups. \\n To provide guidance on child- and gender-sensitive approaches to DDR highlighting the importance of both individualized and community-based approaches. \\n To highlight international norms and standards around criminal responsibility and accountability in relation to CAAFAG.", + "Paragraph": "This module aims to provide DDR practitioners and child protection actors with guidance on the planning, design and implementation of DDR processes for CAAFAG in both mission and non- mission settings. The main objectives of this guidance are: \n To set out the main principles that guide all aspects of DDR processes for children. \n To outline the normative legal framework that applies to children and must be integrated across DDR processes for children through planning, design, implementation and monitoring and evaluation. \n To provide guidance and key considerations to drive continuous efforts to prevent the recruitment and re-recruitment of children into armed forces and groups. \n To provide guidance on child- and gender-sensitive approaches to DDR highlighting the importance of both individualized and community-based approaches. \n To highlight international norms and standards around criminal responsibility and accountability in relation to CAAFAG.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -131358,14 +131358,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n To provide guidance on child- and gender-sensitive approaches to DDR highlighting the importance of both individualized and community-based approaches.", + "Sentence": "\n To provide guidance on child- and gender-sensitive approaches to DDR highlighting the importance of both individualized and community-based approaches.", "newParagraph": "module aim provide ddr practitioner child protection actor guidance planning design implementation ddr process caafag mission non mission setting main objective guidance n set main principle guide aspect ddr process child n outline normative legal framework applies child must integrated across ddr process child planning design implementation monitoring evaluation n provide guidance key consideration drive continuous effort prevent recruitment rerecruitment child armed force group n provide guidance child gendersensitive approach ddr highlighting importance individualized communitybased approach n highlight international norm standard around criminal responsibility accountability relation caafag", "ProcessedSent": "n provide guidance child gendersensitive approach ddr highlighting importance individualized communitybased approach", "SentID": 7297 }, { "ParagraphID": 2206, - "Paragraph": "This module aims to provide DDR practitioners and child protection actors with guidance on the planning, design and implementation of DDR processes for CAAFAG in both mission and non- mission settings. The main objectives of this guidance are: \\n To set out the main principles that guide all aspects of DDR processes for children. \\n To outline the normative legal framework that applies to children and must be integrated across DDR processes for children through planning, design, implementation and monitoring and evaluation. \\n To provide guidance and key considerations to drive continuous efforts to prevent the recruitment and re-recruitment of children into armed forces and groups. \\n To provide guidance on child- and gender-sensitive approaches to DDR highlighting the importance of both individualized and community-based approaches. \\n To highlight international norms and standards around criminal responsibility and accountability in relation to CAAFAG.", + "Paragraph": "This module aims to provide DDR practitioners and child protection actors with guidance on the planning, design and implementation of DDR processes for CAAFAG in both mission and non- mission settings. The main objectives of this guidance are: \n To set out the main principles that guide all aspects of DDR processes for children. \n To outline the normative legal framework that applies to children and must be integrated across DDR processes for children through planning, design, implementation and monitoring and evaluation. \n To provide guidance and key considerations to drive continuous efforts to prevent the recruitment and re-recruitment of children into armed forces and groups. \n To provide guidance on child- and gender-sensitive approaches to DDR highlighting the importance of both individualized and community-based approaches. \n To highlight international norms and standards around criminal responsibility and accountability in relation to CAAFAG.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -131376,7 +131376,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n To highlight international norms and standards around criminal responsibility and accountability in relation to CAAFAG.", + "Sentence": "\n To highlight international norms and standards around criminal responsibility and accountability in relation to CAAFAG.", "newParagraph": "module aim provide ddr practitioner child protection actor guidance planning design implementation ddr process caafag mission non mission setting main objective guidance n set main principle guide aspect ddr process child n outline normative legal framework applies child must integrated across ddr process child planning design implementation monitoring evaluation n provide guidance key consideration drive continuous effort prevent recruitment rerecruitment child armed force group n provide guidance child gendersensitive approach ddr highlighting importance individualized communitybased approach n highlight international norm standard around criminal responsibility accountability relation caafag", "ProcessedSent": "n highlight international norm standard around criminal responsibility accountability relation caafag", "SentID": 7298 @@ -131509,7 +131509,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2209, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -131527,7 +131527,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2209, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -131538,7 +131538,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may must used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "ProcessedSent": "use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "SentID": 7307 @@ -132823,7 +132823,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2228, - "Paragraph": "DDR practitioners shall ensure that no harm is done to children or their families. Rather, they shall seek to maximize any benefits to children, while minimizing any harm. This shall be done through: \\n Assessing and monitoring both positive and negative impacts for children, disaggregating data by age, gender and vulnerabilities of the child, while keeping such data protected; and \\n Listening to and considering the voices and views of children in the planning, design, implementation and review of DDR processes.", + "Paragraph": "DDR practitioners shall ensure that no harm is done to children or their families. Rather, they shall seek to maximize any benefits to children, while minimizing any harm. This shall be done through: \n Assessing and monitoring both positive and negative impacts for children, disaggregating data by age, gender and vulnerabilities of the child, while keeping such data protected; and \n Listening to and considering the voices and views of children in the planning, design, implementation and review of DDR processes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -132841,7 +132841,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2228, - "Paragraph": "DDR practitioners shall ensure that no harm is done to children or their families. Rather, they shall seek to maximize any benefits to children, while minimizing any harm. This shall be done through: \\n Assessing and monitoring both positive and negative impacts for children, disaggregating data by age, gender and vulnerabilities of the child, while keeping such data protected; and \\n Listening to and considering the voices and views of children in the planning, design, implementation and review of DDR processes.", + "Paragraph": "DDR practitioners shall ensure that no harm is done to children or their families. Rather, they shall seek to maximize any benefits to children, while minimizing any harm. This shall be done through: \n Assessing and monitoring both positive and negative impacts for children, disaggregating data by age, gender and vulnerabilities of the child, while keeping such data protected; and \n Listening to and considering the voices and views of children in the planning, design, implementation and review of DDR processes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -132859,7 +132859,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2228, - "Paragraph": "DDR practitioners shall ensure that no harm is done to children or their families. Rather, they shall seek to maximize any benefits to children, while minimizing any harm. This shall be done through: \\n Assessing and monitoring both positive and negative impacts for children, disaggregating data by age, gender and vulnerabilities of the child, while keeping such data protected; and \\n Listening to and considering the voices and views of children in the planning, design, implementation and review of DDR processes.", + "Paragraph": "DDR practitioners shall ensure that no harm is done to children or their families. Rather, they shall seek to maximize any benefits to children, while minimizing any harm. This shall be done through: \n Assessing and monitoring both positive and negative impacts for children, disaggregating data by age, gender and vulnerabilities of the child, while keeping such data protected; and \n Listening to and considering the voices and views of children in the planning, design, implementation and review of DDR processes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -132870,7 +132870,7 @@ "Heading2": "4.4 Conflict sensitive", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This shall be done through: \\n Assessing and monitoring both positive and negative impacts for children, disaggregating data by age, gender and vulnerabilities of the child, while keeping such data protected; and \\n Listening to and considering the voices and views of children in the planning, design, implementation and review of DDR processes.", + "Sentence": "This shall be done through: \n Assessing and monitoring both positive and negative impacts for children, disaggregating data by age, gender and vulnerabilities of the child, while keeping such data protected; and \n Listening to and considering the voices and views of children in the planning, design, implementation and review of DDR processes.", "newParagraph": "ddr practitioner shall ensure harm done child family rather shall seek maximize benefit child minimizing harm shall done n assessing monitoring positive negative impact child disaggregating data age gender vulnerability child keeping data protected n listening considering voice view child planning design implementation review ddr process", "ProcessedSent": "shall done n assessing monitoring positive negative impact child disaggregating data age gender vulnerability child keeping data protected n listening considering voice view child planning design implementation review ddr process", "SentID": 7381 @@ -133490,9 +133490,9 @@ { "ParagraphID": 2240, "Paragraph": "The best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration in all assumptions and decisions made during planning. Emphasis is often placed on the need to estimate the numbers of children in armed forces and groups in order to plan actions. While this is important, policymakers and planners should also recognize that it is difficult to obtain accurate figures. Uncertain estimates during planning, however, should not prevent DDR processes for children from being implemented, or from assuring that every child will have sustained reintegration support.", - "Color": null, - "Level": 9, - "LevelName": null, + "Color": "#D10007", + "Level": 5, + "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", "Title": "Children and DDR", "Module": "5.20 Children and DDR", "PageNum": 9, @@ -133508,9 +133508,9 @@ { "ParagraphID": 2240, "Paragraph": "The best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration in all assumptions and decisions made during planning. Emphasis is often placed on the need to estimate the numbers of children in armed forces and groups in order to plan actions. While this is important, policymakers and planners should also recognize that it is difficult to obtain accurate figures. Uncertain estimates during planning, however, should not prevent DDR processes for children from being implemented, or from assuring that every child will have sustained reintegration support.", - "Color": null, - "Level": 9, - "LevelName": null, + "Color": "#D10007", + "Level": 5, + "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", "Title": "Children and DDR", "Module": "5.20 Children and DDR", "PageNum": 9, @@ -133526,9 +133526,9 @@ { "ParagraphID": 2240, "Paragraph": "The best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration in all assumptions and decisions made during planning. Emphasis is often placed on the need to estimate the numbers of children in armed forces and groups in order to plan actions. While this is important, policymakers and planners should also recognize that it is difficult to obtain accurate figures. Uncertain estimates during planning, however, should not prevent DDR processes for children from being implemented, or from assuring that every child will have sustained reintegration support.", - "Color": null, - "Level": 9, - "LevelName": null, + "Color": "#D10007", + "Level": 5, + "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", "Title": "Children and DDR", "Module": "5.20 Children and DDR", "PageNum": 9, @@ -133545,8 +133545,8 @@ "ParagraphID": 2240, "Paragraph": "The best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration in all assumptions and decisions made during planning. Emphasis is often placed on the need to estimate the numbers of children in armed forces and groups in order to plan actions. While this is important, policymakers and planners should also recognize that it is difficult to obtain accurate figures. Uncertain estimates during planning, however, should not prevent DDR processes for children from being implemented, or from assuring that every child will have sustained reintegration support.", "Color": null, - "Level": 9, - "LevelName": null, + "Level": 5, + "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", "Title": "Children and DDR", "Module": "5.20 Children and DDR", "PageNum": 9, @@ -133975,7 +133975,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2248, - "Paragraph": "The rights of the child, as espoused through the CRC and its OPAC, further support the reintegration of CAAFAG through requiring States to promote: \\n The child's right to life, survival and development: This right is not limited to ensuring a child\u2019s physical wellbeing but includes the need to ensure full and harmonious development, including at the spiritual, moral and social levels, where education plays a key role. In respect to DDR processes for children, this shall include consideration of how a child\u2019s experience in conflict impacts upon his\/her own evolving capacities, as well as recognition of the resilience displayed in surviving and overcoming difficulties. \\n The child\u2019s right to be free from arbitrary detention - No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully or arbitrarily. The arrest, detention or imprisonment of a child shall be in conformity with the law and shall be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time. \\n The child\u2019s right to fair justice and fair treatment - States recognize the right of every child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child's respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child's age and the desirability of promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a constructive role in society. States shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular \\n The physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims: States shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; or armed conflicts. DDR practitioners shall work with States to ensure that recovery and reintegration takes place in an environment which fosters the health, self-respect and dignity of the child. Article 7 of the OPAC forms the legal basis for support to CAAFAG through the obligation of signatories to rehabilitate and socially reintegrate CAAFAG. \\n The child\u2019s right to be free from discrimination: States shall ensure respect for the rights of all children within their jurisdiction \u2013 including non-national children \u2013 regardless of race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, opinions, disability or any other status of the child or the child\u2019s parents or legal guardians. DDR practitioners shall pay particular attention to ensuring the full involvement and inclusion of girls and their children, as well as addressing any stigmatization of CAAFAG. \\n The child\u2019s right to participate: Children shall be allowed to express their opinions freely and participate in making decisions concerning family reunification and career and educational opportunities, and those opinions should be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. Children shall be consulted at all stages of the release and reintegration process, and actions that affect them shall be in their best interests, considering their needs and concerns, placement and family. \\n The child\u2019s best interests as a primary consideration: Actions that affect the child should be based on an assessment of whether those actions are in the child\u2019s best interests. As part of DDR processes for children, this shall mean that all measures to assure release, protection, reintegration and prevention of re-recruitment shall be determined by their best interests. A child shall participate in determining what is in his\/her best interests.", + "Paragraph": "The rights of the child, as espoused through the CRC and its OPAC, further support the reintegration of CAAFAG through requiring States to promote: \n The child's right to life, survival and development: This right is not limited to ensuring a child\u2019s physical wellbeing but includes the need to ensure full and harmonious development, including at the spiritual, moral and social levels, where education plays a key role. In respect to DDR processes for children, this shall include consideration of how a child\u2019s experience in conflict impacts upon his\/her own evolving capacities, as well as recognition of the resilience displayed in surviving and overcoming difficulties. \n The child\u2019s right to be free from arbitrary detention - No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully or arbitrarily. The arrest, detention or imprisonment of a child shall be in conformity with the law and shall be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time. \n The child\u2019s right to fair justice and fair treatment - States recognize the right of every child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child's respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child's age and the desirability of promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a constructive role in society. States shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular \n The physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims: States shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; or armed conflicts. DDR practitioners shall work with States to ensure that recovery and reintegration takes place in an environment which fosters the health, self-respect and dignity of the child. Article 7 of the OPAC forms the legal basis for support to CAAFAG through the obligation of signatories to rehabilitate and socially reintegrate CAAFAG. \n The child\u2019s right to be free from discrimination: States shall ensure respect for the rights of all children within their jurisdiction \u2013 including non-national children \u2013 regardless of race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, opinions, disability or any other status of the child or the child\u2019s parents or legal guardians. DDR practitioners shall pay particular attention to ensuring the full involvement and inclusion of girls and their children, as well as addressing any stigmatization of CAAFAG. \n The child\u2019s right to participate: Children shall be allowed to express their opinions freely and participate in making decisions concerning family reunification and career and educational opportunities, and those opinions should be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. Children shall be consulted at all stages of the release and reintegration process, and actions that affect them shall be in their best interests, considering their needs and concerns, placement and family. \n The child\u2019s best interests as a primary consideration: Actions that affect the child should be based on an assessment of whether those actions are in the child\u2019s best interests. As part of DDR processes for children, this shall mean that all measures to assure release, protection, reintegration and prevention of re-recruitment shall be determined by their best interests. A child shall participate in determining what is in his\/her best interests.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -133986,14 +133986,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 International Human Rights Law", "Heading3": "5.1.1 The convention on the rights of the child and its optional protocols", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The rights of the child, as espoused through the CRC and its OPAC, further support the reintegration of CAAFAG through requiring States to promote: \\n The child's right to life, survival and development: This right is not limited to ensuring a child\u2019s physical wellbeing but includes the need to ensure full and harmonious development, including at the spiritual, moral and social levels, where education plays a key role.", + "Sentence": "The rights of the child, as espoused through the CRC and its OPAC, further support the reintegration of CAAFAG through requiring States to promote: \n The child's right to life, survival and development: This right is not limited to ensuring a child\u2019s physical wellbeing but includes the need to ensure full and harmonious development, including at the spiritual, moral and social levels, where education plays a key role.", "newParagraph": "right child espoused crc opac support reintegration caafag requiring state promote n child right life survival development right limited ensuring child physical wellbeing includes need ensure full harmonious development including spiritual moral social level education play key role respect ddr process child shall include consideration child experience conflict impact upon hisher evolving capacity well recognition resilience displayed surviving overcoming difficulty n child right free arbitrary detention child shall deprived liberty unlawfully arbitrarily arrest detention imprisonment child shall conformity law shall used measure last resort shortest appropriate period time n child right fair justice fair treatment state recognize right every child alleged accused recognized infringed penal law treated manner consistent promotion child sense dignity worth reinforces child respect human right fundamental freedom others take account child age desirability promoting child reintegration child assuming constructive role society state shall seek promote establishment law procedure authority institution specifically applicable child alleged accused recognized infringed penal law particular n physical psychological recovery social reintegration child victim state shall take appropriate measure promote physical psychological recovery social reintegration child victim form neglect exploitation abuse torture form cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment armed conflict ddr practitioner shall work state ensure recovery reintegration take place environment foster health selfrespect dignity child article 7 opac form legal basis support caafag obligation signatory rehabilitate socially reintegrate caafag n child right free discrimination state shall ensure respect right child within jurisdiction including nonnational child regardless race sex age religion ethnicity opinion disability status child child parent legal guardian ddr practitioner shall pay particular attention ensuring full involvement inclusion girl child well addressing stigmatization caafag n child right participate child shall allowed express opinion freely participate making decision concerning family reunification career educational opportunity opinion given due weight accordance age maturity child child shall consulted stage release reintegration process action affect shall best interest considering need concern placement family n child best interest primary consideration action affect child based assessment whether action child best interest part ddr process child shall mean measure assure release protection reintegration prevention rerecruitment shall determined best interest child shall participate determining hisher best interest", "ProcessedSent": "right child espoused crc opac support reintegration caafag requiring state promote n child right life survival development right limited ensuring child physical wellbeing includes need ensure full harmonious development including spiritual moral social level education play key role", "SentID": 7443 }, { "ParagraphID": 2248, - "Paragraph": "The rights of the child, as espoused through the CRC and its OPAC, further support the reintegration of CAAFAG through requiring States to promote: \\n The child's right to life, survival and development: This right is not limited to ensuring a child\u2019s physical wellbeing but includes the need to ensure full and harmonious development, including at the spiritual, moral and social levels, where education plays a key role. In respect to DDR processes for children, this shall include consideration of how a child\u2019s experience in conflict impacts upon his\/her own evolving capacities, as well as recognition of the resilience displayed in surviving and overcoming difficulties. \\n The child\u2019s right to be free from arbitrary detention - No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully or arbitrarily. The arrest, detention or imprisonment of a child shall be in conformity with the law and shall be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time. \\n The child\u2019s right to fair justice and fair treatment - States recognize the right of every child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child's respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child's age and the desirability of promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a constructive role in society. States shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular \\n The physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims: States shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; or armed conflicts. DDR practitioners shall work with States to ensure that recovery and reintegration takes place in an environment which fosters the health, self-respect and dignity of the child. Article 7 of the OPAC forms the legal basis for support to CAAFAG through the obligation of signatories to rehabilitate and socially reintegrate CAAFAG. \\n The child\u2019s right to be free from discrimination: States shall ensure respect for the rights of all children within their jurisdiction \u2013 including non-national children \u2013 regardless of race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, opinions, disability or any other status of the child or the child\u2019s parents or legal guardians. DDR practitioners shall pay particular attention to ensuring the full involvement and inclusion of girls and their children, as well as addressing any stigmatization of CAAFAG. \\n The child\u2019s right to participate: Children shall be allowed to express their opinions freely and participate in making decisions concerning family reunification and career and educational opportunities, and those opinions should be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. Children shall be consulted at all stages of the release and reintegration process, and actions that affect them shall be in their best interests, considering their needs and concerns, placement and family. \\n The child\u2019s best interests as a primary consideration: Actions that affect the child should be based on an assessment of whether those actions are in the child\u2019s best interests. As part of DDR processes for children, this shall mean that all measures to assure release, protection, reintegration and prevention of re-recruitment shall be determined by their best interests. A child shall participate in determining what is in his\/her best interests.", + "Paragraph": "The rights of the child, as espoused through the CRC and its OPAC, further support the reintegration of CAAFAG through requiring States to promote: \n The child's right to life, survival and development: This right is not limited to ensuring a child\u2019s physical wellbeing but includes the need to ensure full and harmonious development, including at the spiritual, moral and social levels, where education plays a key role. In respect to DDR processes for children, this shall include consideration of how a child\u2019s experience in conflict impacts upon his\/her own evolving capacities, as well as recognition of the resilience displayed in surviving and overcoming difficulties. \n The child\u2019s right to be free from arbitrary detention - No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully or arbitrarily. The arrest, detention or imprisonment of a child shall be in conformity with the law and shall be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time. \n The child\u2019s right to fair justice and fair treatment - States recognize the right of every child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child's respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child's age and the desirability of promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a constructive role in society. States shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular \n The physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims: States shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; or armed conflicts. DDR practitioners shall work with States to ensure that recovery and reintegration takes place in an environment which fosters the health, self-respect and dignity of the child. Article 7 of the OPAC forms the legal basis for support to CAAFAG through the obligation of signatories to rehabilitate and socially reintegrate CAAFAG. \n The child\u2019s right to be free from discrimination: States shall ensure respect for the rights of all children within their jurisdiction \u2013 including non-national children \u2013 regardless of race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, opinions, disability or any other status of the child or the child\u2019s parents or legal guardians. DDR practitioners shall pay particular attention to ensuring the full involvement and inclusion of girls and their children, as well as addressing any stigmatization of CAAFAG. \n The child\u2019s right to participate: Children shall be allowed to express their opinions freely and participate in making decisions concerning family reunification and career and educational opportunities, and those opinions should be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. Children shall be consulted at all stages of the release and reintegration process, and actions that affect them shall be in their best interests, considering their needs and concerns, placement and family. \n The child\u2019s best interests as a primary consideration: Actions that affect the child should be based on an assessment of whether those actions are in the child\u2019s best interests. As part of DDR processes for children, this shall mean that all measures to assure release, protection, reintegration and prevention of re-recruitment shall be determined by their best interests. A child shall participate in determining what is in his\/her best interests.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -134011,7 +134011,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2248, - "Paragraph": "The rights of the child, as espoused through the CRC and its OPAC, further support the reintegration of CAAFAG through requiring States to promote: \\n The child's right to life, survival and development: This right is not limited to ensuring a child\u2019s physical wellbeing but includes the need to ensure full and harmonious development, including at the spiritual, moral and social levels, where education plays a key role. In respect to DDR processes for children, this shall include consideration of how a child\u2019s experience in conflict impacts upon his\/her own evolving capacities, as well as recognition of the resilience displayed in surviving and overcoming difficulties. \\n The child\u2019s right to be free from arbitrary detention - No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully or arbitrarily. The arrest, detention or imprisonment of a child shall be in conformity with the law and shall be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time. \\n The child\u2019s right to fair justice and fair treatment - States recognize the right of every child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child's respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child's age and the desirability of promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a constructive role in society. States shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular \\n The physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims: States shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; or armed conflicts. DDR practitioners shall work with States to ensure that recovery and reintegration takes place in an environment which fosters the health, self-respect and dignity of the child. Article 7 of the OPAC forms the legal basis for support to CAAFAG through the obligation of signatories to rehabilitate and socially reintegrate CAAFAG. \\n The child\u2019s right to be free from discrimination: States shall ensure respect for the rights of all children within their jurisdiction \u2013 including non-national children \u2013 regardless of race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, opinions, disability or any other status of the child or the child\u2019s parents or legal guardians. DDR practitioners shall pay particular attention to ensuring the full involvement and inclusion of girls and their children, as well as addressing any stigmatization of CAAFAG. \\n The child\u2019s right to participate: Children shall be allowed to express their opinions freely and participate in making decisions concerning family reunification and career and educational opportunities, and those opinions should be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. Children shall be consulted at all stages of the release and reintegration process, and actions that affect them shall be in their best interests, considering their needs and concerns, placement and family. \\n The child\u2019s best interests as a primary consideration: Actions that affect the child should be based on an assessment of whether those actions are in the child\u2019s best interests. As part of DDR processes for children, this shall mean that all measures to assure release, protection, reintegration and prevention of re-recruitment shall be determined by their best interests. A child shall participate in determining what is in his\/her best interests.", + "Paragraph": "The rights of the child, as espoused through the CRC and its OPAC, further support the reintegration of CAAFAG through requiring States to promote: \n The child's right to life, survival and development: This right is not limited to ensuring a child\u2019s physical wellbeing but includes the need to ensure full and harmonious development, including at the spiritual, moral and social levels, where education plays a key role. In respect to DDR processes for children, this shall include consideration of how a child\u2019s experience in conflict impacts upon his\/her own evolving capacities, as well as recognition of the resilience displayed in surviving and overcoming difficulties. \n The child\u2019s right to be free from arbitrary detention - No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully or arbitrarily. The arrest, detention or imprisonment of a child shall be in conformity with the law and shall be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time. \n The child\u2019s right to fair justice and fair treatment - States recognize the right of every child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child's respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child's age and the desirability of promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a constructive role in society. States shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular \n The physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims: States shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; or armed conflicts. DDR practitioners shall work with States to ensure that recovery and reintegration takes place in an environment which fosters the health, self-respect and dignity of the child. Article 7 of the OPAC forms the legal basis for support to CAAFAG through the obligation of signatories to rehabilitate and socially reintegrate CAAFAG. \n The child\u2019s right to be free from discrimination: States shall ensure respect for the rights of all children within their jurisdiction \u2013 including non-national children \u2013 regardless of race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, opinions, disability or any other status of the child or the child\u2019s parents or legal guardians. DDR practitioners shall pay particular attention to ensuring the full involvement and inclusion of girls and their children, as well as addressing any stigmatization of CAAFAG. \n The child\u2019s right to participate: Children shall be allowed to express their opinions freely and participate in making decisions concerning family reunification and career and educational opportunities, and those opinions should be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. Children shall be consulted at all stages of the release and reintegration process, and actions that affect them shall be in their best interests, considering their needs and concerns, placement and family. \n The child\u2019s best interests as a primary consideration: Actions that affect the child should be based on an assessment of whether those actions are in the child\u2019s best interests. As part of DDR processes for children, this shall mean that all measures to assure release, protection, reintegration and prevention of re-recruitment shall be determined by their best interests. A child shall participate in determining what is in his\/her best interests.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -134022,14 +134022,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 International Human Rights Law", "Heading3": "5.1.1 The convention on the rights of the child and its optional protocols", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The child\u2019s right to be free from arbitrary detention - No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully or arbitrarily.", + "Sentence": "\n The child\u2019s right to be free from arbitrary detention - No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully or arbitrarily.", "newParagraph": "right child espoused crc opac support reintegration caafag requiring state promote n child right life survival development right limited ensuring child physical wellbeing includes need ensure full harmonious development including spiritual moral social level education play key role respect ddr process child shall include consideration child experience conflict impact upon hisher evolving capacity well recognition resilience displayed surviving overcoming difficulty n child right free arbitrary detention child shall deprived liberty unlawfully arbitrarily arrest detention imprisonment child shall conformity law shall used measure last resort shortest appropriate period time n child right fair justice fair treatment state recognize right every child alleged accused recognized infringed penal law treated manner consistent promotion child sense dignity worth reinforces child respect human right fundamental freedom others take account child age desirability promoting child reintegration child assuming constructive role society state shall seek promote establishment law procedure authority institution specifically applicable child alleged accused recognized infringed penal law particular n physical psychological recovery social reintegration child victim state shall take appropriate measure promote physical psychological recovery social reintegration child victim form neglect exploitation abuse torture form cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment armed conflict ddr practitioner shall work state ensure recovery reintegration take place environment foster health selfrespect dignity child article 7 opac form legal basis support caafag obligation signatory rehabilitate socially reintegrate caafag n child right free discrimination state shall ensure respect right child within jurisdiction including nonnational child regardless race sex age religion ethnicity opinion disability status child child parent legal guardian ddr practitioner shall pay particular attention ensuring full involvement inclusion girl child well addressing stigmatization caafag n child right participate child shall allowed express opinion freely participate making decision concerning family reunification career educational opportunity opinion given due weight accordance age maturity child child shall consulted stage release reintegration process action affect shall best interest considering need concern placement family n child best interest primary consideration action affect child based assessment whether action child best interest part ddr process child shall mean measure assure release protection reintegration prevention rerecruitment shall determined best interest child shall participate determining hisher best interest", "ProcessedSent": "n child right free arbitrary detention child shall deprived liberty unlawfully arbitrarily", "SentID": 7445 }, { "ParagraphID": 2248, - "Paragraph": "The rights of the child, as espoused through the CRC and its OPAC, further support the reintegration of CAAFAG through requiring States to promote: \\n The child's right to life, survival and development: This right is not limited to ensuring a child\u2019s physical wellbeing but includes the need to ensure full and harmonious development, including at the spiritual, moral and social levels, where education plays a key role. In respect to DDR processes for children, this shall include consideration of how a child\u2019s experience in conflict impacts upon his\/her own evolving capacities, as well as recognition of the resilience displayed in surviving and overcoming difficulties. \\n The child\u2019s right to be free from arbitrary detention - No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully or arbitrarily. The arrest, detention or imprisonment of a child shall be in conformity with the law and shall be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time. \\n The child\u2019s right to fair justice and fair treatment - States recognize the right of every child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child's respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child's age and the desirability of promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a constructive role in society. States shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular \\n The physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims: States shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; or armed conflicts. DDR practitioners shall work with States to ensure that recovery and reintegration takes place in an environment which fosters the health, self-respect and dignity of the child. Article 7 of the OPAC forms the legal basis for support to CAAFAG through the obligation of signatories to rehabilitate and socially reintegrate CAAFAG. \\n The child\u2019s right to be free from discrimination: States shall ensure respect for the rights of all children within their jurisdiction \u2013 including non-national children \u2013 regardless of race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, opinions, disability or any other status of the child or the child\u2019s parents or legal guardians. DDR practitioners shall pay particular attention to ensuring the full involvement and inclusion of girls and their children, as well as addressing any stigmatization of CAAFAG. \\n The child\u2019s right to participate: Children shall be allowed to express their opinions freely and participate in making decisions concerning family reunification and career and educational opportunities, and those opinions should be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. Children shall be consulted at all stages of the release and reintegration process, and actions that affect them shall be in their best interests, considering their needs and concerns, placement and family. \\n The child\u2019s best interests as a primary consideration: Actions that affect the child should be based on an assessment of whether those actions are in the child\u2019s best interests. As part of DDR processes for children, this shall mean that all measures to assure release, protection, reintegration and prevention of re-recruitment shall be determined by their best interests. A child shall participate in determining what is in his\/her best interests.", + "Paragraph": "The rights of the child, as espoused through the CRC and its OPAC, further support the reintegration of CAAFAG through requiring States to promote: \n The child's right to life, survival and development: This right is not limited to ensuring a child\u2019s physical wellbeing but includes the need to ensure full and harmonious development, including at the spiritual, moral and social levels, where education plays a key role. In respect to DDR processes for children, this shall include consideration of how a child\u2019s experience in conflict impacts upon his\/her own evolving capacities, as well as recognition of the resilience displayed in surviving and overcoming difficulties. \n The child\u2019s right to be free from arbitrary detention - No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully or arbitrarily. The arrest, detention or imprisonment of a child shall be in conformity with the law and shall be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time. \n The child\u2019s right to fair justice and fair treatment - States recognize the right of every child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child's respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child's age and the desirability of promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a constructive role in society. States shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular \n The physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims: States shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; or armed conflicts. DDR practitioners shall work with States to ensure that recovery and reintegration takes place in an environment which fosters the health, self-respect and dignity of the child. Article 7 of the OPAC forms the legal basis for support to CAAFAG through the obligation of signatories to rehabilitate and socially reintegrate CAAFAG. \n The child\u2019s right to be free from discrimination: States shall ensure respect for the rights of all children within their jurisdiction \u2013 including non-national children \u2013 regardless of race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, opinions, disability or any other status of the child or the child\u2019s parents or legal guardians. DDR practitioners shall pay particular attention to ensuring the full involvement and inclusion of girls and their children, as well as addressing any stigmatization of CAAFAG. \n The child\u2019s right to participate: Children shall be allowed to express their opinions freely and participate in making decisions concerning family reunification and career and educational opportunities, and those opinions should be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. Children shall be consulted at all stages of the release and reintegration process, and actions that affect them shall be in their best interests, considering their needs and concerns, placement and family. \n The child\u2019s best interests as a primary consideration: Actions that affect the child should be based on an assessment of whether those actions are in the child\u2019s best interests. As part of DDR processes for children, this shall mean that all measures to assure release, protection, reintegration and prevention of re-recruitment shall be determined by their best interests. A child shall participate in determining what is in his\/her best interests.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -134047,7 +134047,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2248, - "Paragraph": "The rights of the child, as espoused through the CRC and its OPAC, further support the reintegration of CAAFAG through requiring States to promote: \\n The child's right to life, survival and development: This right is not limited to ensuring a child\u2019s physical wellbeing but includes the need to ensure full and harmonious development, including at the spiritual, moral and social levels, where education plays a key role. In respect to DDR processes for children, this shall include consideration of how a child\u2019s experience in conflict impacts upon his\/her own evolving capacities, as well as recognition of the resilience displayed in surviving and overcoming difficulties. \\n The child\u2019s right to be free from arbitrary detention - No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully or arbitrarily. The arrest, detention or imprisonment of a child shall be in conformity with the law and shall be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time. \\n The child\u2019s right to fair justice and fair treatment - States recognize the right of every child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child's respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child's age and the desirability of promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a constructive role in society. States shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular \\n The physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims: States shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; or armed conflicts. DDR practitioners shall work with States to ensure that recovery and reintegration takes place in an environment which fosters the health, self-respect and dignity of the child. Article 7 of the OPAC forms the legal basis for support to CAAFAG through the obligation of signatories to rehabilitate and socially reintegrate CAAFAG. \\n The child\u2019s right to be free from discrimination: States shall ensure respect for the rights of all children within their jurisdiction \u2013 including non-national children \u2013 regardless of race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, opinions, disability or any other status of the child or the child\u2019s parents or legal guardians. DDR practitioners shall pay particular attention to ensuring the full involvement and inclusion of girls and their children, as well as addressing any stigmatization of CAAFAG. \\n The child\u2019s right to participate: Children shall be allowed to express their opinions freely and participate in making decisions concerning family reunification and career and educational opportunities, and those opinions should be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. Children shall be consulted at all stages of the release and reintegration process, and actions that affect them shall be in their best interests, considering their needs and concerns, placement and family. \\n The child\u2019s best interests as a primary consideration: Actions that affect the child should be based on an assessment of whether those actions are in the child\u2019s best interests. As part of DDR processes for children, this shall mean that all measures to assure release, protection, reintegration and prevention of re-recruitment shall be determined by their best interests. A child shall participate in determining what is in his\/her best interests.", + "Paragraph": "The rights of the child, as espoused through the CRC and its OPAC, further support the reintegration of CAAFAG through requiring States to promote: \n The child's right to life, survival and development: This right is not limited to ensuring a child\u2019s physical wellbeing but includes the need to ensure full and harmonious development, including at the spiritual, moral and social levels, where education plays a key role. In respect to DDR processes for children, this shall include consideration of how a child\u2019s experience in conflict impacts upon his\/her own evolving capacities, as well as recognition of the resilience displayed in surviving and overcoming difficulties. \n The child\u2019s right to be free from arbitrary detention - No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully or arbitrarily. The arrest, detention or imprisonment of a child shall be in conformity with the law and shall be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time. \n The child\u2019s right to fair justice and fair treatment - States recognize the right of every child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child's respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child's age and the desirability of promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a constructive role in society. States shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular \n The physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims: States shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; or armed conflicts. DDR practitioners shall work with States to ensure that recovery and reintegration takes place in an environment which fosters the health, self-respect and dignity of the child. Article 7 of the OPAC forms the legal basis for support to CAAFAG through the obligation of signatories to rehabilitate and socially reintegrate CAAFAG. \n The child\u2019s right to be free from discrimination: States shall ensure respect for the rights of all children within their jurisdiction \u2013 including non-national children \u2013 regardless of race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, opinions, disability or any other status of the child or the child\u2019s parents or legal guardians. DDR practitioners shall pay particular attention to ensuring the full involvement and inclusion of girls and their children, as well as addressing any stigmatization of CAAFAG. \n The child\u2019s right to participate: Children shall be allowed to express their opinions freely and participate in making decisions concerning family reunification and career and educational opportunities, and those opinions should be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. Children shall be consulted at all stages of the release and reintegration process, and actions that affect them shall be in their best interests, considering their needs and concerns, placement and family. \n The child\u2019s best interests as a primary consideration: Actions that affect the child should be based on an assessment of whether those actions are in the child\u2019s best interests. As part of DDR processes for children, this shall mean that all measures to assure release, protection, reintegration and prevention of re-recruitment shall be determined by their best interests. A child shall participate in determining what is in his\/her best interests.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -134058,14 +134058,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 International Human Rights Law", "Heading3": "5.1.1 The convention on the rights of the child and its optional protocols", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The child\u2019s right to fair justice and fair treatment - States recognize the right of every child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child's respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child's age and the desirability of promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a constructive role in society.", + "Sentence": "\n The child\u2019s right to fair justice and fair treatment - States recognize the right of every child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child's respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child's age and the desirability of promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a constructive role in society.", "newParagraph": "right child espoused crc opac support reintegration caafag requiring state promote n child right life survival development right limited ensuring child physical wellbeing includes need ensure full harmonious development including spiritual moral social level education play key role respect ddr process child shall include consideration child experience conflict impact upon hisher evolving capacity well recognition resilience displayed surviving overcoming difficulty n child right free arbitrary detention child shall deprived liberty unlawfully arbitrarily arrest detention imprisonment child shall conformity law shall used measure last resort shortest appropriate period time n child right fair justice fair treatment state recognize right every child alleged accused recognized infringed penal law treated manner consistent promotion child sense dignity worth reinforces child respect human right fundamental freedom others take account child age desirability promoting child reintegration child assuming constructive role society state shall seek promote establishment law procedure authority institution specifically applicable child alleged accused recognized infringed penal law particular n physical psychological recovery social reintegration child victim state shall take appropriate measure promote physical psychological recovery social reintegration child victim form neglect exploitation abuse torture form cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment armed conflict ddr practitioner shall work state ensure recovery reintegration take place environment foster health selfrespect dignity child article 7 opac form legal basis support caafag obligation signatory rehabilitate socially reintegrate caafag n child right free discrimination state shall ensure respect right child within jurisdiction including nonnational child regardless race sex age religion ethnicity opinion disability status child child parent legal guardian ddr practitioner shall pay particular attention ensuring full involvement inclusion girl child well addressing stigmatization caafag n child right participate child shall allowed express opinion freely participate making decision concerning family reunification career educational opportunity opinion given due weight accordance age maturity child child shall consulted stage release reintegration process action affect shall best interest considering need concern placement family n child best interest primary consideration action affect child based assessment whether action child best interest part ddr process child shall mean measure assure release protection reintegration prevention rerecruitment shall determined best interest child shall participate determining hisher best interest", "ProcessedSent": "n child right fair justice fair treatment state recognize right every child alleged accused recognized infringed penal law treated manner consistent promotion child sense dignity worth reinforces child respect human right fundamental freedom others take account child age desirability promoting child reintegration child assuming constructive role society", "SentID": 7447 }, { "ParagraphID": 2248, - "Paragraph": "The rights of the child, as espoused through the CRC and its OPAC, further support the reintegration of CAAFAG through requiring States to promote: \\n The child's right to life, survival and development: This right is not limited to ensuring a child\u2019s physical wellbeing but includes the need to ensure full and harmonious development, including at the spiritual, moral and social levels, where education plays a key role. In respect to DDR processes for children, this shall include consideration of how a child\u2019s experience in conflict impacts upon his\/her own evolving capacities, as well as recognition of the resilience displayed in surviving and overcoming difficulties. \\n The child\u2019s right to be free from arbitrary detention - No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully or arbitrarily. The arrest, detention or imprisonment of a child shall be in conformity with the law and shall be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time. \\n The child\u2019s right to fair justice and fair treatment - States recognize the right of every child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child's respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child's age and the desirability of promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a constructive role in society. States shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular \\n The physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims: States shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; or armed conflicts. DDR practitioners shall work with States to ensure that recovery and reintegration takes place in an environment which fosters the health, self-respect and dignity of the child. Article 7 of the OPAC forms the legal basis for support to CAAFAG through the obligation of signatories to rehabilitate and socially reintegrate CAAFAG. \\n The child\u2019s right to be free from discrimination: States shall ensure respect for the rights of all children within their jurisdiction \u2013 including non-national children \u2013 regardless of race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, opinions, disability or any other status of the child or the child\u2019s parents or legal guardians. DDR practitioners shall pay particular attention to ensuring the full involvement and inclusion of girls and their children, as well as addressing any stigmatization of CAAFAG. \\n The child\u2019s right to participate: Children shall be allowed to express their opinions freely and participate in making decisions concerning family reunification and career and educational opportunities, and those opinions should be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. Children shall be consulted at all stages of the release and reintegration process, and actions that affect them shall be in their best interests, considering their needs and concerns, placement and family. \\n The child\u2019s best interests as a primary consideration: Actions that affect the child should be based on an assessment of whether those actions are in the child\u2019s best interests. As part of DDR processes for children, this shall mean that all measures to assure release, protection, reintegration and prevention of re-recruitment shall be determined by their best interests. A child shall participate in determining what is in his\/her best interests.", + "Paragraph": "The rights of the child, as espoused through the CRC and its OPAC, further support the reintegration of CAAFAG through requiring States to promote: \n The child's right to life, survival and development: This right is not limited to ensuring a child\u2019s physical wellbeing but includes the need to ensure full and harmonious development, including at the spiritual, moral and social levels, where education plays a key role. In respect to DDR processes for children, this shall include consideration of how a child\u2019s experience in conflict impacts upon his\/her own evolving capacities, as well as recognition of the resilience displayed in surviving and overcoming difficulties. \n The child\u2019s right to be free from arbitrary detention - No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully or arbitrarily. The arrest, detention or imprisonment of a child shall be in conformity with the law and shall be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time. \n The child\u2019s right to fair justice and fair treatment - States recognize the right of every child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child's respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child's age and the desirability of promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a constructive role in society. States shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular \n The physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims: States shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; or armed conflicts. DDR practitioners shall work with States to ensure that recovery and reintegration takes place in an environment which fosters the health, self-respect and dignity of the child. Article 7 of the OPAC forms the legal basis for support to CAAFAG through the obligation of signatories to rehabilitate and socially reintegrate CAAFAG. \n The child\u2019s right to be free from discrimination: States shall ensure respect for the rights of all children within their jurisdiction \u2013 including non-national children \u2013 regardless of race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, opinions, disability or any other status of the child or the child\u2019s parents or legal guardians. DDR practitioners shall pay particular attention to ensuring the full involvement and inclusion of girls and their children, as well as addressing any stigmatization of CAAFAG. \n The child\u2019s right to participate: Children shall be allowed to express their opinions freely and participate in making decisions concerning family reunification and career and educational opportunities, and those opinions should be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. Children shall be consulted at all stages of the release and reintegration process, and actions that affect them shall be in their best interests, considering their needs and concerns, placement and family. \n The child\u2019s best interests as a primary consideration: Actions that affect the child should be based on an assessment of whether those actions are in the child\u2019s best interests. As part of DDR processes for children, this shall mean that all measures to assure release, protection, reintegration and prevention of re-recruitment shall be determined by their best interests. A child shall participate in determining what is in his\/her best interests.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -134076,14 +134076,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 International Human Rights Law", "Heading3": "5.1.1 The convention on the rights of the child and its optional protocols", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "States shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular \\n The physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims: States shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; or armed conflicts.", + "Sentence": "States shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular \n The physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims: States shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; or armed conflicts.", "newParagraph": "right child espoused crc opac support reintegration caafag requiring state promote n child right life survival development right limited ensuring child physical wellbeing includes need ensure full harmonious development including spiritual moral social level education play key role respect ddr process child shall include consideration child experience conflict impact upon hisher evolving capacity well recognition resilience displayed surviving overcoming difficulty n child right free arbitrary detention child shall deprived liberty unlawfully arbitrarily arrest detention imprisonment child shall conformity law shall used measure last resort shortest appropriate period time n child right fair justice fair treatment state recognize right every child alleged accused recognized infringed penal law treated manner consistent promotion child sense dignity worth reinforces child respect human right fundamental freedom others take account child age desirability promoting child reintegration child assuming constructive role society state shall seek promote establishment law procedure authority institution specifically applicable child alleged accused recognized infringed penal law particular n physical psychological recovery social reintegration child victim state shall take appropriate measure promote physical psychological recovery social reintegration child victim form neglect exploitation abuse torture form cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment armed conflict ddr practitioner shall work state ensure recovery reintegration take place environment foster health selfrespect dignity child article 7 opac form legal basis support caafag obligation signatory rehabilitate socially reintegrate caafag n child right free discrimination state shall ensure respect right child within jurisdiction including nonnational child regardless race sex age religion ethnicity opinion disability status child child parent legal guardian ddr practitioner shall pay particular attention ensuring full involvement inclusion girl child well addressing stigmatization caafag n child right participate child shall allowed express opinion freely participate making decision concerning family reunification career educational opportunity opinion given due weight accordance age maturity child child shall consulted stage release reintegration process action affect shall best interest considering need concern placement family n child best interest primary consideration action affect child based assessment whether action child best interest part ddr process child shall mean measure assure release protection reintegration prevention rerecruitment shall determined best interest child shall participate determining hisher best interest", "ProcessedSent": "state shall seek promote establishment law procedure authority institution specifically applicable child alleged accused recognized infringed penal law particular n physical psychological recovery social reintegration child victim state shall take appropriate measure promote physical psychological recovery social reintegration child victim form neglect exploitation abuse torture form cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment armed conflict", "SentID": 7448 }, { "ParagraphID": 2248, - "Paragraph": "The rights of the child, as espoused through the CRC and its OPAC, further support the reintegration of CAAFAG through requiring States to promote: \\n The child's right to life, survival and development: This right is not limited to ensuring a child\u2019s physical wellbeing but includes the need to ensure full and harmonious development, including at the spiritual, moral and social levels, where education plays a key role. In respect to DDR processes for children, this shall include consideration of how a child\u2019s experience in conflict impacts upon his\/her own evolving capacities, as well as recognition of the resilience displayed in surviving and overcoming difficulties. \\n The child\u2019s right to be free from arbitrary detention - No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully or arbitrarily. The arrest, detention or imprisonment of a child shall be in conformity with the law and shall be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time. \\n The child\u2019s right to fair justice and fair treatment - States recognize the right of every child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child's respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child's age and the desirability of promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a constructive role in society. States shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular \\n The physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims: States shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; or armed conflicts. DDR practitioners shall work with States to ensure that recovery and reintegration takes place in an environment which fosters the health, self-respect and dignity of the child. Article 7 of the OPAC forms the legal basis for support to CAAFAG through the obligation of signatories to rehabilitate and socially reintegrate CAAFAG. \\n The child\u2019s right to be free from discrimination: States shall ensure respect for the rights of all children within their jurisdiction \u2013 including non-national children \u2013 regardless of race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, opinions, disability or any other status of the child or the child\u2019s parents or legal guardians. DDR practitioners shall pay particular attention to ensuring the full involvement and inclusion of girls and their children, as well as addressing any stigmatization of CAAFAG. \\n The child\u2019s right to participate: Children shall be allowed to express their opinions freely and participate in making decisions concerning family reunification and career and educational opportunities, and those opinions should be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. Children shall be consulted at all stages of the release and reintegration process, and actions that affect them shall be in their best interests, considering their needs and concerns, placement and family. \\n The child\u2019s best interests as a primary consideration: Actions that affect the child should be based on an assessment of whether those actions are in the child\u2019s best interests. As part of DDR processes for children, this shall mean that all measures to assure release, protection, reintegration and prevention of re-recruitment shall be determined by their best interests. A child shall participate in determining what is in his\/her best interests.", + "Paragraph": "The rights of the child, as espoused through the CRC and its OPAC, further support the reintegration of CAAFAG through requiring States to promote: \n The child's right to life, survival and development: This right is not limited to ensuring a child\u2019s physical wellbeing but includes the need to ensure full and harmonious development, including at the spiritual, moral and social levels, where education plays a key role. In respect to DDR processes for children, this shall include consideration of how a child\u2019s experience in conflict impacts upon his\/her own evolving capacities, as well as recognition of the resilience displayed in surviving and overcoming difficulties. \n The child\u2019s right to be free from arbitrary detention - No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully or arbitrarily. The arrest, detention or imprisonment of a child shall be in conformity with the law and shall be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time. \n The child\u2019s right to fair justice and fair treatment - States recognize the right of every child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child's respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child's age and the desirability of promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a constructive role in society. States shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular \n The physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims: States shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; or armed conflicts. DDR practitioners shall work with States to ensure that recovery and reintegration takes place in an environment which fosters the health, self-respect and dignity of the child. Article 7 of the OPAC forms the legal basis for support to CAAFAG through the obligation of signatories to rehabilitate and socially reintegrate CAAFAG. \n The child\u2019s right to be free from discrimination: States shall ensure respect for the rights of all children within their jurisdiction \u2013 including non-national children \u2013 regardless of race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, opinions, disability or any other status of the child or the child\u2019s parents or legal guardians. DDR practitioners shall pay particular attention to ensuring the full involvement and inclusion of girls and their children, as well as addressing any stigmatization of CAAFAG. \n The child\u2019s right to participate: Children shall be allowed to express their opinions freely and participate in making decisions concerning family reunification and career and educational opportunities, and those opinions should be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. Children shall be consulted at all stages of the release and reintegration process, and actions that affect them shall be in their best interests, considering their needs and concerns, placement and family. \n The child\u2019s best interests as a primary consideration: Actions that affect the child should be based on an assessment of whether those actions are in the child\u2019s best interests. As part of DDR processes for children, this shall mean that all measures to assure release, protection, reintegration and prevention of re-recruitment shall be determined by their best interests. A child shall participate in determining what is in his\/her best interests.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -134101,7 +134101,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2248, - "Paragraph": "The rights of the child, as espoused through the CRC and its OPAC, further support the reintegration of CAAFAG through requiring States to promote: \\n The child's right to life, survival and development: This right is not limited to ensuring a child\u2019s physical wellbeing but includes the need to ensure full and harmonious development, including at the spiritual, moral and social levels, where education plays a key role. In respect to DDR processes for children, this shall include consideration of how a child\u2019s experience in conflict impacts upon his\/her own evolving capacities, as well as recognition of the resilience displayed in surviving and overcoming difficulties. \\n The child\u2019s right to be free from arbitrary detention - No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully or arbitrarily. The arrest, detention or imprisonment of a child shall be in conformity with the law and shall be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time. \\n The child\u2019s right to fair justice and fair treatment - States recognize the right of every child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child's respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child's age and the desirability of promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a constructive role in society. States shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular \\n The physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims: States shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; or armed conflicts. DDR practitioners shall work with States to ensure that recovery and reintegration takes place in an environment which fosters the health, self-respect and dignity of the child. Article 7 of the OPAC forms the legal basis for support to CAAFAG through the obligation of signatories to rehabilitate and socially reintegrate CAAFAG. \\n The child\u2019s right to be free from discrimination: States shall ensure respect for the rights of all children within their jurisdiction \u2013 including non-national children \u2013 regardless of race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, opinions, disability or any other status of the child or the child\u2019s parents or legal guardians. DDR practitioners shall pay particular attention to ensuring the full involvement and inclusion of girls and their children, as well as addressing any stigmatization of CAAFAG. \\n The child\u2019s right to participate: Children shall be allowed to express their opinions freely and participate in making decisions concerning family reunification and career and educational opportunities, and those opinions should be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. Children shall be consulted at all stages of the release and reintegration process, and actions that affect them shall be in their best interests, considering their needs and concerns, placement and family. \\n The child\u2019s best interests as a primary consideration: Actions that affect the child should be based on an assessment of whether those actions are in the child\u2019s best interests. As part of DDR processes for children, this shall mean that all measures to assure release, protection, reintegration and prevention of re-recruitment shall be determined by their best interests. A child shall participate in determining what is in his\/her best interests.", + "Paragraph": "The rights of the child, as espoused through the CRC and its OPAC, further support the reintegration of CAAFAG through requiring States to promote: \n The child's right to life, survival and development: This right is not limited to ensuring a child\u2019s physical wellbeing but includes the need to ensure full and harmonious development, including at the spiritual, moral and social levels, where education plays a key role. In respect to DDR processes for children, this shall include consideration of how a child\u2019s experience in conflict impacts upon his\/her own evolving capacities, as well as recognition of the resilience displayed in surviving and overcoming difficulties. \n The child\u2019s right to be free from arbitrary detention - No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully or arbitrarily. The arrest, detention or imprisonment of a child shall be in conformity with the law and shall be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time. \n The child\u2019s right to fair justice and fair treatment - States recognize the right of every child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child's respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child's age and the desirability of promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a constructive role in society. States shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular \n The physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims: States shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; or armed conflicts. DDR practitioners shall work with States to ensure that recovery and reintegration takes place in an environment which fosters the health, self-respect and dignity of the child. Article 7 of the OPAC forms the legal basis for support to CAAFAG through the obligation of signatories to rehabilitate and socially reintegrate CAAFAG. \n The child\u2019s right to be free from discrimination: States shall ensure respect for the rights of all children within their jurisdiction \u2013 including non-national children \u2013 regardless of race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, opinions, disability or any other status of the child or the child\u2019s parents or legal guardians. DDR practitioners shall pay particular attention to ensuring the full involvement and inclusion of girls and their children, as well as addressing any stigmatization of CAAFAG. \n The child\u2019s right to participate: Children shall be allowed to express their opinions freely and participate in making decisions concerning family reunification and career and educational opportunities, and those opinions should be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. Children shall be consulted at all stages of the release and reintegration process, and actions that affect them shall be in their best interests, considering their needs and concerns, placement and family. \n The child\u2019s best interests as a primary consideration: Actions that affect the child should be based on an assessment of whether those actions are in the child\u2019s best interests. As part of DDR processes for children, this shall mean that all measures to assure release, protection, reintegration and prevention of re-recruitment shall be determined by their best interests. A child shall participate in determining what is in his\/her best interests.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -134119,7 +134119,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2248, - "Paragraph": "The rights of the child, as espoused through the CRC and its OPAC, further support the reintegration of CAAFAG through requiring States to promote: \\n The child's right to life, survival and development: This right is not limited to ensuring a child\u2019s physical wellbeing but includes the need to ensure full and harmonious development, including at the spiritual, moral and social levels, where education plays a key role. In respect to DDR processes for children, this shall include consideration of how a child\u2019s experience in conflict impacts upon his\/her own evolving capacities, as well as recognition of the resilience displayed in surviving and overcoming difficulties. \\n The child\u2019s right to be free from arbitrary detention - No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully or arbitrarily. The arrest, detention or imprisonment of a child shall be in conformity with the law and shall be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time. \\n The child\u2019s right to fair justice and fair treatment - States recognize the right of every child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child's respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child's age and the desirability of promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a constructive role in society. States shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular \\n The physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims: States shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; or armed conflicts. DDR practitioners shall work with States to ensure that recovery and reintegration takes place in an environment which fosters the health, self-respect and dignity of the child. Article 7 of the OPAC forms the legal basis for support to CAAFAG through the obligation of signatories to rehabilitate and socially reintegrate CAAFAG. \\n The child\u2019s right to be free from discrimination: States shall ensure respect for the rights of all children within their jurisdiction \u2013 including non-national children \u2013 regardless of race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, opinions, disability or any other status of the child or the child\u2019s parents or legal guardians. DDR practitioners shall pay particular attention to ensuring the full involvement and inclusion of girls and their children, as well as addressing any stigmatization of CAAFAG. \\n The child\u2019s right to participate: Children shall be allowed to express their opinions freely and participate in making decisions concerning family reunification and career and educational opportunities, and those opinions should be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. Children shall be consulted at all stages of the release and reintegration process, and actions that affect them shall be in their best interests, considering their needs and concerns, placement and family. \\n The child\u2019s best interests as a primary consideration: Actions that affect the child should be based on an assessment of whether those actions are in the child\u2019s best interests. As part of DDR processes for children, this shall mean that all measures to assure release, protection, reintegration and prevention of re-recruitment shall be determined by their best interests. A child shall participate in determining what is in his\/her best interests.", + "Paragraph": "The rights of the child, as espoused through the CRC and its OPAC, further support the reintegration of CAAFAG through requiring States to promote: \n The child's right to life, survival and development: This right is not limited to ensuring a child\u2019s physical wellbeing but includes the need to ensure full and harmonious development, including at the spiritual, moral and social levels, where education plays a key role. In respect to DDR processes for children, this shall include consideration of how a child\u2019s experience in conflict impacts upon his\/her own evolving capacities, as well as recognition of the resilience displayed in surviving and overcoming difficulties. \n The child\u2019s right to be free from arbitrary detention - No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully or arbitrarily. The arrest, detention or imprisonment of a child shall be in conformity with the law and shall be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time. \n The child\u2019s right to fair justice and fair treatment - States recognize the right of every child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child's respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child's age and the desirability of promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a constructive role in society. States shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular \n The physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims: States shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; or armed conflicts. DDR practitioners shall work with States to ensure that recovery and reintegration takes place in an environment which fosters the health, self-respect and dignity of the child. Article 7 of the OPAC forms the legal basis for support to CAAFAG through the obligation of signatories to rehabilitate and socially reintegrate CAAFAG. \n The child\u2019s right to be free from discrimination: States shall ensure respect for the rights of all children within their jurisdiction \u2013 including non-national children \u2013 regardless of race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, opinions, disability or any other status of the child or the child\u2019s parents or legal guardians. DDR practitioners shall pay particular attention to ensuring the full involvement and inclusion of girls and their children, as well as addressing any stigmatization of CAAFAG. \n The child\u2019s right to participate: Children shall be allowed to express their opinions freely and participate in making decisions concerning family reunification and career and educational opportunities, and those opinions should be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. Children shall be consulted at all stages of the release and reintegration process, and actions that affect them shall be in their best interests, considering their needs and concerns, placement and family. \n The child\u2019s best interests as a primary consideration: Actions that affect the child should be based on an assessment of whether those actions are in the child\u2019s best interests. As part of DDR processes for children, this shall mean that all measures to assure release, protection, reintegration and prevention of re-recruitment shall be determined by their best interests. A child shall participate in determining what is in his\/her best interests.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -134130,14 +134130,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 International Human Rights Law", "Heading3": "5.1.1 The convention on the rights of the child and its optional protocols", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The child\u2019s right to be free from discrimination: States shall ensure respect for the rights of all children within their jurisdiction \u2013 including non-national children \u2013 regardless of race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, opinions, disability or any other status of the child or the child\u2019s parents or legal guardians.", + "Sentence": "\n The child\u2019s right to be free from discrimination: States shall ensure respect for the rights of all children within their jurisdiction \u2013 including non-national children \u2013 regardless of race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, opinions, disability or any other status of the child or the child\u2019s parents or legal guardians.", "newParagraph": "right child espoused crc opac support reintegration caafag requiring state promote n child right life survival development right limited ensuring child physical wellbeing includes need ensure full harmonious development including spiritual moral social level education play key role respect ddr process child shall include consideration child experience conflict impact upon hisher evolving capacity well recognition resilience displayed surviving overcoming difficulty n child right free arbitrary detention child shall deprived liberty unlawfully arbitrarily arrest detention imprisonment child shall conformity law shall used measure last resort shortest appropriate period time n child right fair justice fair treatment state recognize right every child alleged accused recognized infringed penal law treated manner consistent promotion child sense dignity worth reinforces child respect human right fundamental freedom others take account child age desirability promoting child reintegration child assuming constructive role society state shall seek promote establishment law procedure authority institution specifically applicable child alleged accused recognized infringed penal law particular n physical psychological recovery social reintegration child victim state shall take appropriate measure promote physical psychological recovery social reintegration child victim form neglect exploitation abuse torture form cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment armed conflict ddr practitioner shall work state ensure recovery reintegration take place environment foster health selfrespect dignity child article 7 opac form legal basis support caafag obligation signatory rehabilitate socially reintegrate caafag n child right free discrimination state shall ensure respect right child within jurisdiction including nonnational child regardless race sex age religion ethnicity opinion disability status child child parent legal guardian ddr practitioner shall pay particular attention ensuring full involvement inclusion girl child well addressing stigmatization caafag n child right participate child shall allowed express opinion freely participate making decision concerning family reunification career educational opportunity opinion given due weight accordance age maturity child child shall consulted stage release reintegration process action affect shall best interest considering need concern placement family n child best interest primary consideration action affect child based assessment whether action child best interest part ddr process child shall mean measure assure release protection reintegration prevention rerecruitment shall determined best interest child shall participate determining hisher best interest", "ProcessedSent": "n child right free discrimination state shall ensure respect right child within jurisdiction including nonnational child regardless race sex age religion ethnicity opinion disability status child child parent legal guardian", "SentID": 7451 }, { "ParagraphID": 2248, - "Paragraph": "The rights of the child, as espoused through the CRC and its OPAC, further support the reintegration of CAAFAG through requiring States to promote: \\n The child's right to life, survival and development: This right is not limited to ensuring a child\u2019s physical wellbeing but includes the need to ensure full and harmonious development, including at the spiritual, moral and social levels, where education plays a key role. In respect to DDR processes for children, this shall include consideration of how a child\u2019s experience in conflict impacts upon his\/her own evolving capacities, as well as recognition of the resilience displayed in surviving and overcoming difficulties. \\n The child\u2019s right to be free from arbitrary detention - No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully or arbitrarily. The arrest, detention or imprisonment of a child shall be in conformity with the law and shall be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time. \\n The child\u2019s right to fair justice and fair treatment - States recognize the right of every child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child's respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child's age and the desirability of promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a constructive role in society. States shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular \\n The physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims: States shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; or armed conflicts. DDR practitioners shall work with States to ensure that recovery and reintegration takes place in an environment which fosters the health, self-respect and dignity of the child. Article 7 of the OPAC forms the legal basis for support to CAAFAG through the obligation of signatories to rehabilitate and socially reintegrate CAAFAG. \\n The child\u2019s right to be free from discrimination: States shall ensure respect for the rights of all children within their jurisdiction \u2013 including non-national children \u2013 regardless of race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, opinions, disability or any other status of the child or the child\u2019s parents or legal guardians. DDR practitioners shall pay particular attention to ensuring the full involvement and inclusion of girls and their children, as well as addressing any stigmatization of CAAFAG. \\n The child\u2019s right to participate: Children shall be allowed to express their opinions freely and participate in making decisions concerning family reunification and career and educational opportunities, and those opinions should be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. Children shall be consulted at all stages of the release and reintegration process, and actions that affect them shall be in their best interests, considering their needs and concerns, placement and family. \\n The child\u2019s best interests as a primary consideration: Actions that affect the child should be based on an assessment of whether those actions are in the child\u2019s best interests. As part of DDR processes for children, this shall mean that all measures to assure release, protection, reintegration and prevention of re-recruitment shall be determined by their best interests. A child shall participate in determining what is in his\/her best interests.", + "Paragraph": "The rights of the child, as espoused through the CRC and its OPAC, further support the reintegration of CAAFAG through requiring States to promote: \n The child's right to life, survival and development: This right is not limited to ensuring a child\u2019s physical wellbeing but includes the need to ensure full and harmonious development, including at the spiritual, moral and social levels, where education plays a key role. In respect to DDR processes for children, this shall include consideration of how a child\u2019s experience in conflict impacts upon his\/her own evolving capacities, as well as recognition of the resilience displayed in surviving and overcoming difficulties. \n The child\u2019s right to be free from arbitrary detention - No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully or arbitrarily. The arrest, detention or imprisonment of a child shall be in conformity with the law and shall be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time. \n The child\u2019s right to fair justice and fair treatment - States recognize the right of every child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child's respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child's age and the desirability of promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a constructive role in society. States shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular \n The physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims: States shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; or armed conflicts. DDR practitioners shall work with States to ensure that recovery and reintegration takes place in an environment which fosters the health, self-respect and dignity of the child. Article 7 of the OPAC forms the legal basis for support to CAAFAG through the obligation of signatories to rehabilitate and socially reintegrate CAAFAG. \n The child\u2019s right to be free from discrimination: States shall ensure respect for the rights of all children within their jurisdiction \u2013 including non-national children \u2013 regardless of race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, opinions, disability or any other status of the child or the child\u2019s parents or legal guardians. DDR practitioners shall pay particular attention to ensuring the full involvement and inclusion of girls and their children, as well as addressing any stigmatization of CAAFAG. \n The child\u2019s right to participate: Children shall be allowed to express their opinions freely and participate in making decisions concerning family reunification and career and educational opportunities, and those opinions should be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. Children shall be consulted at all stages of the release and reintegration process, and actions that affect them shall be in their best interests, considering their needs and concerns, placement and family. \n The child\u2019s best interests as a primary consideration: Actions that affect the child should be based on an assessment of whether those actions are in the child\u2019s best interests. As part of DDR processes for children, this shall mean that all measures to assure release, protection, reintegration and prevention of re-recruitment shall be determined by their best interests. A child shall participate in determining what is in his\/her best interests.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -134155,7 +134155,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2248, - "Paragraph": "The rights of the child, as espoused through the CRC and its OPAC, further support the reintegration of CAAFAG through requiring States to promote: \\n The child's right to life, survival and development: This right is not limited to ensuring a child\u2019s physical wellbeing but includes the need to ensure full and harmonious development, including at the spiritual, moral and social levels, where education plays a key role. In respect to DDR processes for children, this shall include consideration of how a child\u2019s experience in conflict impacts upon his\/her own evolving capacities, as well as recognition of the resilience displayed in surviving and overcoming difficulties. \\n The child\u2019s right to be free from arbitrary detention - No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully or arbitrarily. The arrest, detention or imprisonment of a child shall be in conformity with the law and shall be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time. \\n The child\u2019s right to fair justice and fair treatment - States recognize the right of every child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child's respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child's age and the desirability of promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a constructive role in society. States shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular \\n The physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims: States shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; or armed conflicts. DDR practitioners shall work with States to ensure that recovery and reintegration takes place in an environment which fosters the health, self-respect and dignity of the child. Article 7 of the OPAC forms the legal basis for support to CAAFAG through the obligation of signatories to rehabilitate and socially reintegrate CAAFAG. \\n The child\u2019s right to be free from discrimination: States shall ensure respect for the rights of all children within their jurisdiction \u2013 including non-national children \u2013 regardless of race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, opinions, disability or any other status of the child or the child\u2019s parents or legal guardians. DDR practitioners shall pay particular attention to ensuring the full involvement and inclusion of girls and their children, as well as addressing any stigmatization of CAAFAG. \\n The child\u2019s right to participate: Children shall be allowed to express their opinions freely and participate in making decisions concerning family reunification and career and educational opportunities, and those opinions should be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. Children shall be consulted at all stages of the release and reintegration process, and actions that affect them shall be in their best interests, considering their needs and concerns, placement and family. \\n The child\u2019s best interests as a primary consideration: Actions that affect the child should be based on an assessment of whether those actions are in the child\u2019s best interests. As part of DDR processes for children, this shall mean that all measures to assure release, protection, reintegration and prevention of re-recruitment shall be determined by their best interests. A child shall participate in determining what is in his\/her best interests.", + "Paragraph": "The rights of the child, as espoused through the CRC and its OPAC, further support the reintegration of CAAFAG through requiring States to promote: \n The child's right to life, survival and development: This right is not limited to ensuring a child\u2019s physical wellbeing but includes the need to ensure full and harmonious development, including at the spiritual, moral and social levels, where education plays a key role. In respect to DDR processes for children, this shall include consideration of how a child\u2019s experience in conflict impacts upon his\/her own evolving capacities, as well as recognition of the resilience displayed in surviving and overcoming difficulties. \n The child\u2019s right to be free from arbitrary detention - No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully or arbitrarily. The arrest, detention or imprisonment of a child shall be in conformity with the law and shall be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time. \n The child\u2019s right to fair justice and fair treatment - States recognize the right of every child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child's respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child's age and the desirability of promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a constructive role in society. States shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular \n The physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims: States shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; or armed conflicts. DDR practitioners shall work with States to ensure that recovery and reintegration takes place in an environment which fosters the health, self-respect and dignity of the child. Article 7 of the OPAC forms the legal basis for support to CAAFAG through the obligation of signatories to rehabilitate and socially reintegrate CAAFAG. \n The child\u2019s right to be free from discrimination: States shall ensure respect for the rights of all children within their jurisdiction \u2013 including non-national children \u2013 regardless of race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, opinions, disability or any other status of the child or the child\u2019s parents or legal guardians. DDR practitioners shall pay particular attention to ensuring the full involvement and inclusion of girls and their children, as well as addressing any stigmatization of CAAFAG. \n The child\u2019s right to participate: Children shall be allowed to express their opinions freely and participate in making decisions concerning family reunification and career and educational opportunities, and those opinions should be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. Children shall be consulted at all stages of the release and reintegration process, and actions that affect them shall be in their best interests, considering their needs and concerns, placement and family. \n The child\u2019s best interests as a primary consideration: Actions that affect the child should be based on an assessment of whether those actions are in the child\u2019s best interests. As part of DDR processes for children, this shall mean that all measures to assure release, protection, reintegration and prevention of re-recruitment shall be determined by their best interests. A child shall participate in determining what is in his\/her best interests.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -134166,14 +134166,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 International Human Rights Law", "Heading3": "5.1.1 The convention on the rights of the child and its optional protocols", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The child\u2019s right to participate: Children shall be allowed to express their opinions freely and participate in making decisions concerning family reunification and career and educational opportunities, and those opinions should be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child.", + "Sentence": "\n The child\u2019s right to participate: Children shall be allowed to express their opinions freely and participate in making decisions concerning family reunification and career and educational opportunities, and those opinions should be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child.", "newParagraph": "right child espoused crc opac support reintegration caafag requiring state promote n child right life survival development right limited ensuring child physical wellbeing includes need ensure full harmonious development including spiritual moral social level education play key role respect ddr process child shall include consideration child experience conflict impact upon hisher evolving capacity well recognition resilience displayed surviving overcoming difficulty n child right free arbitrary detention child shall deprived liberty unlawfully arbitrarily arrest detention imprisonment child shall conformity law shall used measure last resort shortest appropriate period time n child right fair justice fair treatment state recognize right every child alleged accused recognized infringed penal law treated manner consistent promotion child sense dignity worth reinforces child respect human right fundamental freedom others take account child age desirability promoting child reintegration child assuming constructive role society state shall seek promote establishment law procedure authority institution specifically applicable child alleged accused recognized infringed penal law particular n physical psychological recovery social reintegration child victim state shall take appropriate measure promote physical psychological recovery social reintegration child victim form neglect exploitation abuse torture form cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment armed conflict ddr practitioner shall work state ensure recovery reintegration take place environment foster health selfrespect dignity child article 7 opac form legal basis support caafag obligation signatory rehabilitate socially reintegrate caafag n child right free discrimination state shall ensure respect right child within jurisdiction including nonnational child regardless race sex age religion ethnicity opinion disability status child child parent legal guardian ddr practitioner shall pay particular attention ensuring full involvement inclusion girl child well addressing stigmatization caafag n child right participate child shall allowed express opinion freely participate making decision concerning family reunification career educational opportunity opinion given due weight accordance age maturity child child shall consulted stage release reintegration process action affect shall best interest considering need concern placement family n child best interest primary consideration action affect child based assessment whether action child best interest part ddr process child shall mean measure assure release protection reintegration prevention rerecruitment shall determined best interest child shall participate determining hisher best interest", "ProcessedSent": "n child right participate child shall allowed express opinion freely participate making decision concerning family reunification career educational opportunity opinion given due weight accordance age maturity child", "SentID": 7453 }, { "ParagraphID": 2248, - "Paragraph": "The rights of the child, as espoused through the CRC and its OPAC, further support the reintegration of CAAFAG through requiring States to promote: \\n The child's right to life, survival and development: This right is not limited to ensuring a child\u2019s physical wellbeing but includes the need to ensure full and harmonious development, including at the spiritual, moral and social levels, where education plays a key role. In respect to DDR processes for children, this shall include consideration of how a child\u2019s experience in conflict impacts upon his\/her own evolving capacities, as well as recognition of the resilience displayed in surviving and overcoming difficulties. \\n The child\u2019s right to be free from arbitrary detention - No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully or arbitrarily. The arrest, detention or imprisonment of a child shall be in conformity with the law and shall be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time. \\n The child\u2019s right to fair justice and fair treatment - States recognize the right of every child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child's respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child's age and the desirability of promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a constructive role in society. States shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular \\n The physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims: States shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; or armed conflicts. DDR practitioners shall work with States to ensure that recovery and reintegration takes place in an environment which fosters the health, self-respect and dignity of the child. Article 7 of the OPAC forms the legal basis for support to CAAFAG through the obligation of signatories to rehabilitate and socially reintegrate CAAFAG. \\n The child\u2019s right to be free from discrimination: States shall ensure respect for the rights of all children within their jurisdiction \u2013 including non-national children \u2013 regardless of race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, opinions, disability or any other status of the child or the child\u2019s parents or legal guardians. DDR practitioners shall pay particular attention to ensuring the full involvement and inclusion of girls and their children, as well as addressing any stigmatization of CAAFAG. \\n The child\u2019s right to participate: Children shall be allowed to express their opinions freely and participate in making decisions concerning family reunification and career and educational opportunities, and those opinions should be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. Children shall be consulted at all stages of the release and reintegration process, and actions that affect them shall be in their best interests, considering their needs and concerns, placement and family. \\n The child\u2019s best interests as a primary consideration: Actions that affect the child should be based on an assessment of whether those actions are in the child\u2019s best interests. As part of DDR processes for children, this shall mean that all measures to assure release, protection, reintegration and prevention of re-recruitment shall be determined by their best interests. A child shall participate in determining what is in his\/her best interests.", + "Paragraph": "The rights of the child, as espoused through the CRC and its OPAC, further support the reintegration of CAAFAG through requiring States to promote: \n The child's right to life, survival and development: This right is not limited to ensuring a child\u2019s physical wellbeing but includes the need to ensure full and harmonious development, including at the spiritual, moral and social levels, where education plays a key role. In respect to DDR processes for children, this shall include consideration of how a child\u2019s experience in conflict impacts upon his\/her own evolving capacities, as well as recognition of the resilience displayed in surviving and overcoming difficulties. \n The child\u2019s right to be free from arbitrary detention - No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully or arbitrarily. The arrest, detention or imprisonment of a child shall be in conformity with the law and shall be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time. \n The child\u2019s right to fair justice and fair treatment - States recognize the right of every child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child's respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child's age and the desirability of promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a constructive role in society. States shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular \n The physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims: States shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; or armed conflicts. DDR practitioners shall work with States to ensure that recovery and reintegration takes place in an environment which fosters the health, self-respect and dignity of the child. Article 7 of the OPAC forms the legal basis for support to CAAFAG through the obligation of signatories to rehabilitate and socially reintegrate CAAFAG. \n The child\u2019s right to be free from discrimination: States shall ensure respect for the rights of all children within their jurisdiction \u2013 including non-national children \u2013 regardless of race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, opinions, disability or any other status of the child or the child\u2019s parents or legal guardians. DDR practitioners shall pay particular attention to ensuring the full involvement and inclusion of girls and their children, as well as addressing any stigmatization of CAAFAG. \n The child\u2019s right to participate: Children shall be allowed to express their opinions freely and participate in making decisions concerning family reunification and career and educational opportunities, and those opinions should be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. Children shall be consulted at all stages of the release and reintegration process, and actions that affect them shall be in their best interests, considering their needs and concerns, placement and family. \n The child\u2019s best interests as a primary consideration: Actions that affect the child should be based on an assessment of whether those actions are in the child\u2019s best interests. As part of DDR processes for children, this shall mean that all measures to assure release, protection, reintegration and prevention of re-recruitment shall be determined by their best interests. A child shall participate in determining what is in his\/her best interests.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -134191,7 +134191,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2248, - "Paragraph": "The rights of the child, as espoused through the CRC and its OPAC, further support the reintegration of CAAFAG through requiring States to promote: \\n The child's right to life, survival and development: This right is not limited to ensuring a child\u2019s physical wellbeing but includes the need to ensure full and harmonious development, including at the spiritual, moral and social levels, where education plays a key role. In respect to DDR processes for children, this shall include consideration of how a child\u2019s experience in conflict impacts upon his\/her own evolving capacities, as well as recognition of the resilience displayed in surviving and overcoming difficulties. \\n The child\u2019s right to be free from arbitrary detention - No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully or arbitrarily. The arrest, detention or imprisonment of a child shall be in conformity with the law and shall be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time. \\n The child\u2019s right to fair justice and fair treatment - States recognize the right of every child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child's respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child's age and the desirability of promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a constructive role in society. States shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular \\n The physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims: States shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; or armed conflicts. DDR practitioners shall work with States to ensure that recovery and reintegration takes place in an environment which fosters the health, self-respect and dignity of the child. Article 7 of the OPAC forms the legal basis for support to CAAFAG through the obligation of signatories to rehabilitate and socially reintegrate CAAFAG. \\n The child\u2019s right to be free from discrimination: States shall ensure respect for the rights of all children within their jurisdiction \u2013 including non-national children \u2013 regardless of race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, opinions, disability or any other status of the child or the child\u2019s parents or legal guardians. DDR practitioners shall pay particular attention to ensuring the full involvement and inclusion of girls and their children, as well as addressing any stigmatization of CAAFAG. \\n The child\u2019s right to participate: Children shall be allowed to express their opinions freely and participate in making decisions concerning family reunification and career and educational opportunities, and those opinions should be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. Children shall be consulted at all stages of the release and reintegration process, and actions that affect them shall be in their best interests, considering their needs and concerns, placement and family. \\n The child\u2019s best interests as a primary consideration: Actions that affect the child should be based on an assessment of whether those actions are in the child\u2019s best interests. As part of DDR processes for children, this shall mean that all measures to assure release, protection, reintegration and prevention of re-recruitment shall be determined by their best interests. A child shall participate in determining what is in his\/her best interests.", + "Paragraph": "The rights of the child, as espoused through the CRC and its OPAC, further support the reintegration of CAAFAG through requiring States to promote: \n The child's right to life, survival and development: This right is not limited to ensuring a child\u2019s physical wellbeing but includes the need to ensure full and harmonious development, including at the spiritual, moral and social levels, where education plays a key role. In respect to DDR processes for children, this shall include consideration of how a child\u2019s experience in conflict impacts upon his\/her own evolving capacities, as well as recognition of the resilience displayed in surviving and overcoming difficulties. \n The child\u2019s right to be free from arbitrary detention - No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully or arbitrarily. The arrest, detention or imprisonment of a child shall be in conformity with the law and shall be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time. \n The child\u2019s right to fair justice and fair treatment - States recognize the right of every child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child's respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child's age and the desirability of promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a constructive role in society. States shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular \n The physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims: States shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; or armed conflicts. DDR practitioners shall work with States to ensure that recovery and reintegration takes place in an environment which fosters the health, self-respect and dignity of the child. Article 7 of the OPAC forms the legal basis for support to CAAFAG through the obligation of signatories to rehabilitate and socially reintegrate CAAFAG. \n The child\u2019s right to be free from discrimination: States shall ensure respect for the rights of all children within their jurisdiction \u2013 including non-national children \u2013 regardless of race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, opinions, disability or any other status of the child or the child\u2019s parents or legal guardians. DDR practitioners shall pay particular attention to ensuring the full involvement and inclusion of girls and their children, as well as addressing any stigmatization of CAAFAG. \n The child\u2019s right to participate: Children shall be allowed to express their opinions freely and participate in making decisions concerning family reunification and career and educational opportunities, and those opinions should be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. Children shall be consulted at all stages of the release and reintegration process, and actions that affect them shall be in their best interests, considering their needs and concerns, placement and family. \n The child\u2019s best interests as a primary consideration: Actions that affect the child should be based on an assessment of whether those actions are in the child\u2019s best interests. As part of DDR processes for children, this shall mean that all measures to assure release, protection, reintegration and prevention of re-recruitment shall be determined by their best interests. A child shall participate in determining what is in his\/her best interests.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -134202,14 +134202,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 International Human Rights Law", "Heading3": "5.1.1 The convention on the rights of the child and its optional protocols", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The child\u2019s best interests as a primary consideration: Actions that affect the child should be based on an assessment of whether those actions are in the child\u2019s best interests.", + "Sentence": "\n The child\u2019s best interests as a primary consideration: Actions that affect the child should be based on an assessment of whether those actions are in the child\u2019s best interests.", "newParagraph": "right child espoused crc opac support reintegration caafag requiring state promote n child right life survival development right limited ensuring child physical wellbeing includes need ensure full harmonious development including spiritual moral social level education play key role respect ddr process child shall include consideration child experience conflict impact upon hisher evolving capacity well recognition resilience displayed surviving overcoming difficulty n child right free arbitrary detention child shall deprived liberty unlawfully arbitrarily arrest detention imprisonment child shall conformity law shall used measure last resort shortest appropriate period time n child right fair justice fair treatment state recognize right every child alleged accused recognized infringed penal law treated manner consistent promotion child sense dignity worth reinforces child respect human right fundamental freedom others take account child age desirability promoting child reintegration child assuming constructive role society state shall seek promote establishment law procedure authority institution specifically applicable child alleged accused recognized infringed penal law particular n physical psychological recovery social reintegration child victim state shall take appropriate measure promote physical psychological recovery social reintegration child victim form neglect exploitation abuse torture form cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment armed conflict ddr practitioner shall work state ensure recovery reintegration take place environment foster health selfrespect dignity child article 7 opac form legal basis support caafag obligation signatory rehabilitate socially reintegrate caafag n child right free discrimination state shall ensure respect right child within jurisdiction including nonnational child regardless race sex age religion ethnicity opinion disability status child child parent legal guardian ddr practitioner shall pay particular attention ensuring full involvement inclusion girl child well addressing stigmatization caafag n child right participate child shall allowed express opinion freely participate making decision concerning family reunification career educational opportunity opinion given due weight accordance age maturity child child shall consulted stage release reintegration process action affect shall best interest considering need concern placement family n child best interest primary consideration action affect child based assessment whether action child best interest part ddr process child shall mean measure assure release protection reintegration prevention rerecruitment shall determined best interest child shall participate determining hisher best interest", "ProcessedSent": "n child best interest primary consideration action affect child based assessment whether action child best interest", "SentID": 7455 }, { "ParagraphID": 2248, - "Paragraph": "The rights of the child, as espoused through the CRC and its OPAC, further support the reintegration of CAAFAG through requiring States to promote: \\n The child's right to life, survival and development: This right is not limited to ensuring a child\u2019s physical wellbeing but includes the need to ensure full and harmonious development, including at the spiritual, moral and social levels, where education plays a key role. In respect to DDR processes for children, this shall include consideration of how a child\u2019s experience in conflict impacts upon his\/her own evolving capacities, as well as recognition of the resilience displayed in surviving and overcoming difficulties. \\n The child\u2019s right to be free from arbitrary detention - No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully or arbitrarily. The arrest, detention or imprisonment of a child shall be in conformity with the law and shall be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time. \\n The child\u2019s right to fair justice and fair treatment - States recognize the right of every child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child's respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child's age and the desirability of promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a constructive role in society. States shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular \\n The physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims: States shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; or armed conflicts. DDR practitioners shall work with States to ensure that recovery and reintegration takes place in an environment which fosters the health, self-respect and dignity of the child. Article 7 of the OPAC forms the legal basis for support to CAAFAG through the obligation of signatories to rehabilitate and socially reintegrate CAAFAG. \\n The child\u2019s right to be free from discrimination: States shall ensure respect for the rights of all children within their jurisdiction \u2013 including non-national children \u2013 regardless of race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, opinions, disability or any other status of the child or the child\u2019s parents or legal guardians. DDR practitioners shall pay particular attention to ensuring the full involvement and inclusion of girls and their children, as well as addressing any stigmatization of CAAFAG. \\n The child\u2019s right to participate: Children shall be allowed to express their opinions freely and participate in making decisions concerning family reunification and career and educational opportunities, and those opinions should be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. Children shall be consulted at all stages of the release and reintegration process, and actions that affect them shall be in their best interests, considering their needs and concerns, placement and family. \\n The child\u2019s best interests as a primary consideration: Actions that affect the child should be based on an assessment of whether those actions are in the child\u2019s best interests. As part of DDR processes for children, this shall mean that all measures to assure release, protection, reintegration and prevention of re-recruitment shall be determined by their best interests. A child shall participate in determining what is in his\/her best interests.", + "Paragraph": "The rights of the child, as espoused through the CRC and its OPAC, further support the reintegration of CAAFAG through requiring States to promote: \n The child's right to life, survival and development: This right is not limited to ensuring a child\u2019s physical wellbeing but includes the need to ensure full and harmonious development, including at the spiritual, moral and social levels, where education plays a key role. In respect to DDR processes for children, this shall include consideration of how a child\u2019s experience in conflict impacts upon his\/her own evolving capacities, as well as recognition of the resilience displayed in surviving and overcoming difficulties. \n The child\u2019s right to be free from arbitrary detention - No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully or arbitrarily. The arrest, detention or imprisonment of a child shall be in conformity with the law and shall be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time. \n The child\u2019s right to fair justice and fair treatment - States recognize the right of every child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child's respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child's age and the desirability of promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a constructive role in society. States shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular \n The physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims: States shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; or armed conflicts. DDR practitioners shall work with States to ensure that recovery and reintegration takes place in an environment which fosters the health, self-respect and dignity of the child. Article 7 of the OPAC forms the legal basis for support to CAAFAG through the obligation of signatories to rehabilitate and socially reintegrate CAAFAG. \n The child\u2019s right to be free from discrimination: States shall ensure respect for the rights of all children within their jurisdiction \u2013 including non-national children \u2013 regardless of race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, opinions, disability or any other status of the child or the child\u2019s parents or legal guardians. DDR practitioners shall pay particular attention to ensuring the full involvement and inclusion of girls and their children, as well as addressing any stigmatization of CAAFAG. \n The child\u2019s right to participate: Children shall be allowed to express their opinions freely and participate in making decisions concerning family reunification and career and educational opportunities, and those opinions should be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. Children shall be consulted at all stages of the release and reintegration process, and actions that affect them shall be in their best interests, considering their needs and concerns, placement and family. \n The child\u2019s best interests as a primary consideration: Actions that affect the child should be based on an assessment of whether those actions are in the child\u2019s best interests. As part of DDR processes for children, this shall mean that all measures to assure release, protection, reintegration and prevention of re-recruitment shall be determined by their best interests. A child shall participate in determining what is in his\/her best interests.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -134227,7 +134227,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2248, - "Paragraph": "The rights of the child, as espoused through the CRC and its OPAC, further support the reintegration of CAAFAG through requiring States to promote: \\n The child's right to life, survival and development: This right is not limited to ensuring a child\u2019s physical wellbeing but includes the need to ensure full and harmonious development, including at the spiritual, moral and social levels, where education plays a key role. In respect to DDR processes for children, this shall include consideration of how a child\u2019s experience in conflict impacts upon his\/her own evolving capacities, as well as recognition of the resilience displayed in surviving and overcoming difficulties. \\n The child\u2019s right to be free from arbitrary detention - No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully or arbitrarily. The arrest, detention or imprisonment of a child shall be in conformity with the law and shall be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time. \\n The child\u2019s right to fair justice and fair treatment - States recognize the right of every child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child's respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child's age and the desirability of promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a constructive role in society. States shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular \\n The physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims: States shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; or armed conflicts. DDR practitioners shall work with States to ensure that recovery and reintegration takes place in an environment which fosters the health, self-respect and dignity of the child. Article 7 of the OPAC forms the legal basis for support to CAAFAG through the obligation of signatories to rehabilitate and socially reintegrate CAAFAG. \\n The child\u2019s right to be free from discrimination: States shall ensure respect for the rights of all children within their jurisdiction \u2013 including non-national children \u2013 regardless of race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, opinions, disability or any other status of the child or the child\u2019s parents or legal guardians. DDR practitioners shall pay particular attention to ensuring the full involvement and inclusion of girls and their children, as well as addressing any stigmatization of CAAFAG. \\n The child\u2019s right to participate: Children shall be allowed to express their opinions freely and participate in making decisions concerning family reunification and career and educational opportunities, and those opinions should be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. Children shall be consulted at all stages of the release and reintegration process, and actions that affect them shall be in their best interests, considering their needs and concerns, placement and family. \\n The child\u2019s best interests as a primary consideration: Actions that affect the child should be based on an assessment of whether those actions are in the child\u2019s best interests. As part of DDR processes for children, this shall mean that all measures to assure release, protection, reintegration and prevention of re-recruitment shall be determined by their best interests. A child shall participate in determining what is in his\/her best interests.", + "Paragraph": "The rights of the child, as espoused through the CRC and its OPAC, further support the reintegration of CAAFAG through requiring States to promote: \n The child's right to life, survival and development: This right is not limited to ensuring a child\u2019s physical wellbeing but includes the need to ensure full and harmonious development, including at the spiritual, moral and social levels, where education plays a key role. In respect to DDR processes for children, this shall include consideration of how a child\u2019s experience in conflict impacts upon his\/her own evolving capacities, as well as recognition of the resilience displayed in surviving and overcoming difficulties. \n The child\u2019s right to be free from arbitrary detention - No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully or arbitrarily. The arrest, detention or imprisonment of a child shall be in conformity with the law and shall be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time. \n The child\u2019s right to fair justice and fair treatment - States recognize the right of every child alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child's respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which takes into account the child's age and the desirability of promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a constructive role in society. States shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular \n The physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of child victims: States shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; or armed conflicts. DDR practitioners shall work with States to ensure that recovery and reintegration takes place in an environment which fosters the health, self-respect and dignity of the child. Article 7 of the OPAC forms the legal basis for support to CAAFAG through the obligation of signatories to rehabilitate and socially reintegrate CAAFAG. \n The child\u2019s right to be free from discrimination: States shall ensure respect for the rights of all children within their jurisdiction \u2013 including non-national children \u2013 regardless of race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, opinions, disability or any other status of the child or the child\u2019s parents or legal guardians. DDR practitioners shall pay particular attention to ensuring the full involvement and inclusion of girls and their children, as well as addressing any stigmatization of CAAFAG. \n The child\u2019s right to participate: Children shall be allowed to express their opinions freely and participate in making decisions concerning family reunification and career and educational opportunities, and those opinions should be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. Children shall be consulted at all stages of the release and reintegration process, and actions that affect them shall be in their best interests, considering their needs and concerns, placement and family. \n The child\u2019s best interests as a primary consideration: Actions that affect the child should be based on an assessment of whether those actions are in the child\u2019s best interests. As part of DDR processes for children, this shall mean that all measures to assure release, protection, reintegration and prevention of re-recruitment shall be determined by their best interests. A child shall participate in determining what is in his\/her best interests.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -134497,7 +134497,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2257, - "Paragraph": "The 2007 Paris Principles, building on the 1997 Cape Town Principles, detail eight general principles and eight operational principles to protect children. Specific consideration is given to girls and their particular needs and challenges. The Paris Principles aim to guide interventions with the following objectives: \\n To prevent the unlawful recruitment or use of children; and \\n To facilitate the release of CAAFAG; and \\n To facilitate the reintegration of all CAAFAG; and \\n To ensure the most protective environment for all children.", + "Paragraph": "The 2007 Paris Principles, building on the 1997 Cape Town Principles, detail eight general principles and eight operational principles to protect children. Specific consideration is given to girls and their particular needs and challenges. The Paris Principles aim to guide interventions with the following objectives: \n To prevent the unlawful recruitment or use of children; and \n To facilitate the release of CAAFAG; and \n To facilitate the reintegration of all CAAFAG; and \n To ensure the most protective environment for all children.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -134515,7 +134515,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2257, - "Paragraph": "The 2007 Paris Principles, building on the 1997 Cape Town Principles, detail eight general principles and eight operational principles to protect children. Specific consideration is given to girls and their particular needs and challenges. The Paris Principles aim to guide interventions with the following objectives: \\n To prevent the unlawful recruitment or use of children; and \\n To facilitate the release of CAAFAG; and \\n To facilitate the reintegration of all CAAFAG; and \\n To ensure the most protective environment for all children.", + "Paragraph": "The 2007 Paris Principles, building on the 1997 Cape Town Principles, detail eight general principles and eight operational principles to protect children. Specific consideration is given to girls and their particular needs and challenges. The Paris Principles aim to guide interventions with the following objectives: \n To prevent the unlawful recruitment or use of children; and \n To facilitate the release of CAAFAG; and \n To facilitate the reintegration of all CAAFAG; and \n To ensure the most protective environment for all children.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -134533,7 +134533,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2257, - "Paragraph": "The 2007 Paris Principles, building on the 1997 Cape Town Principles, detail eight general principles and eight operational principles to protect children. Specific consideration is given to girls and their particular needs and challenges. The Paris Principles aim to guide interventions with the following objectives: \\n To prevent the unlawful recruitment or use of children; and \\n To facilitate the release of CAAFAG; and \\n To facilitate the reintegration of all CAAFAG; and \\n To ensure the most protective environment for all children.", + "Paragraph": "The 2007 Paris Principles, building on the 1997 Cape Town Principles, detail eight general principles and eight operational principles to protect children. Specific consideration is given to girls and their particular needs and challenges. The Paris Principles aim to guide interventions with the following objectives: \n To prevent the unlawful recruitment or use of children; and \n To facilitate the release of CAAFAG; and \n To facilitate the reintegration of all CAAFAG; and \n To ensure the most protective environment for all children.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -134544,7 +134544,7 @@ "Heading2": "5.5 International Standards", "Heading3": "5.5.1 The Paris Principles and Paris commitments", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The Paris Principles aim to guide interventions with the following objectives: \\n To prevent the unlawful recruitment or use of children; and \\n To facilitate the release of CAAFAG; and \\n To facilitate the reintegration of all CAAFAG; and \\n To ensure the most protective environment for all children.", + "Sentence": "The Paris Principles aim to guide interventions with the following objectives: \n To prevent the unlawful recruitment or use of children; and \n To facilitate the release of CAAFAG; and \n To facilitate the reintegration of all CAAFAG; and \n To ensure the most protective environment for all children.", "newParagraph": "2007 paris principle building 1997 cape town principle detail eight general principle eight operational principle protect child specific consideration given girl particular need challenge paris principle aim guide intervention following objective n prevent unlawful recruitment use child n facilitate release caafag n facilitate reintegration caafag n ensure protective environment child", "ProcessedSent": "paris principle aim guide intervention following objective n prevent unlawful recruitment use child n facilitate release caafag n facilitate reintegration caafag n ensure protective environment child", "SentID": 7474 @@ -134785,7 +134785,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2262, - "Paragraph": "A detailed situation analysis should assess broad conflict-related issues (location, political and social dynamics, causes, impacts, etc.) but also the specific impacts on children, including disaggregation by gender, age and location (urban-rural). The situation analysis is critical to identifying obstacles to, and opportunities for, reintegration support. A detailed situation analysis should examine: \\n\u00a7 The objectives, tactics and command structure\/management\/hierarchy of the armed force or group; \\n\u00a7 The circumstances, patterns, causes, conditions, means and extent of child recruitment by age and gender; \\n\u00a7 The emotional and psychological consequences of children\u2019s living conditions and experiences and their gendered dimensions; \\n\u00a7 Attitudes, beliefs and norms regarding gender identities in armed forces and groups and in the community; \\n\u00a7 The attitudes of families and communities towards the conflict, and the extent of their resilience and capacities; \\n\u00a7 The absorption capacity of and support services necessary in communities of return, in particular families, which play a critical role in successful release and reintegration efforts; \\n\u00a7 The extent of children\u2019s participation in armed forces and groups, including roles played and gender, age or other differences; \\n\u00a7 Children\u2019s needs, expectations, and aspirations; \\n\u00a7 The evident obstacles to, and opportunities for, child and youth reintegration, with consideration of what risks and opportunities may arise in the future; and \\n\u00a7 The needs of, and challenges of working with, special groups (girls, girl mothers, disabled children, foreign children, young children, adolescents, male survivors of sexual violence, 16 severely distressed children, children displaying signs of post-traumatic stress disorder, and unaccompanied and separated children).", + "Paragraph": "A detailed situation analysis should assess broad conflict-related issues (location, political and social dynamics, causes, impacts, etc.) but also the specific impacts on children, including disaggregation by gender, age and location (urban-rural). The situation analysis is critical to identifying obstacles to, and opportunities for, reintegration support. A detailed situation analysis should examine: \n\u00a7 The objectives, tactics and command structure\/management\/hierarchy of the armed force or group; \n\u00a7 The circumstances, patterns, causes, conditions, means and extent of child recruitment by age and gender; \n\u00a7 The emotional and psychological consequences of children\u2019s living conditions and experiences and their gendered dimensions; \n\u00a7 Attitudes, beliefs and norms regarding gender identities in armed forces and groups and in the community; \n\u00a7 The attitudes of families and communities towards the conflict, and the extent of their resilience and capacities; \n\u00a7 The absorption capacity of and support services necessary in communities of return, in particular families, which play a critical role in successful release and reintegration efforts; \n\u00a7 The extent of children\u2019s participation in armed forces and groups, including roles played and gender, age or other differences; \n\u00a7 Children\u2019s needs, expectations, and aspirations; \n\u00a7 The evident obstacles to, and opportunities for, child and youth reintegration, with consideration of what risks and opportunities may arise in the future; and \n\u00a7 The needs of, and challenges of working with, special groups (girls, girl mothers, disabled children, foreign children, young children, adolescents, male survivors of sexual violence, 16 severely distressed children, children displaying signs of post-traumatic stress disorder, and unaccompanied and separated children).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -134803,7 +134803,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2262, - "Paragraph": "A detailed situation analysis should assess broad conflict-related issues (location, political and social dynamics, causes, impacts, etc.) but also the specific impacts on children, including disaggregation by gender, age and location (urban-rural). The situation analysis is critical to identifying obstacles to, and opportunities for, reintegration support. A detailed situation analysis should examine: \\n\u00a7 The objectives, tactics and command structure\/management\/hierarchy of the armed force or group; \\n\u00a7 The circumstances, patterns, causes, conditions, means and extent of child recruitment by age and gender; \\n\u00a7 The emotional and psychological consequences of children\u2019s living conditions and experiences and their gendered dimensions; \\n\u00a7 Attitudes, beliefs and norms regarding gender identities in armed forces and groups and in the community; \\n\u00a7 The attitudes of families and communities towards the conflict, and the extent of their resilience and capacities; \\n\u00a7 The absorption capacity of and support services necessary in communities of return, in particular families, which play a critical role in successful release and reintegration efforts; \\n\u00a7 The extent of children\u2019s participation in armed forces and groups, including roles played and gender, age or other differences; \\n\u00a7 Children\u2019s needs, expectations, and aspirations; \\n\u00a7 The evident obstacles to, and opportunities for, child and youth reintegration, with consideration of what risks and opportunities may arise in the future; and \\n\u00a7 The needs of, and challenges of working with, special groups (girls, girl mothers, disabled children, foreign children, young children, adolescents, male survivors of sexual violence, 16 severely distressed children, children displaying signs of post-traumatic stress disorder, and unaccompanied and separated children).", + "Paragraph": "A detailed situation analysis should assess broad conflict-related issues (location, political and social dynamics, causes, impacts, etc.) but also the specific impacts on children, including disaggregation by gender, age and location (urban-rural). The situation analysis is critical to identifying obstacles to, and opportunities for, reintegration support. A detailed situation analysis should examine: \n\u00a7 The objectives, tactics and command structure\/management\/hierarchy of the armed force or group; \n\u00a7 The circumstances, patterns, causes, conditions, means and extent of child recruitment by age and gender; \n\u00a7 The emotional and psychological consequences of children\u2019s living conditions and experiences and their gendered dimensions; \n\u00a7 Attitudes, beliefs and norms regarding gender identities in armed forces and groups and in the community; \n\u00a7 The attitudes of families and communities towards the conflict, and the extent of their resilience and capacities; \n\u00a7 The absorption capacity of and support services necessary in communities of return, in particular families, which play a critical role in successful release and reintegration efforts; \n\u00a7 The extent of children\u2019s participation in armed forces and groups, including roles played and gender, age or other differences; \n\u00a7 Children\u2019s needs, expectations, and aspirations; \n\u00a7 The evident obstacles to, and opportunities for, child and youth reintegration, with consideration of what risks and opportunities may arise in the future; and \n\u00a7 The needs of, and challenges of working with, special groups (girls, girl mothers, disabled children, foreign children, young children, adolescents, male survivors of sexual violence, 16 severely distressed children, children displaying signs of post-traumatic stress disorder, and unaccompanied and separated children).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -134821,7 +134821,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2262, - "Paragraph": "A detailed situation analysis should assess broad conflict-related issues (location, political and social dynamics, causes, impacts, etc.) but also the specific impacts on children, including disaggregation by gender, age and location (urban-rural). The situation analysis is critical to identifying obstacles to, and opportunities for, reintegration support. A detailed situation analysis should examine: \\n\u00a7 The objectives, tactics and command structure\/management\/hierarchy of the armed force or group; \\n\u00a7 The circumstances, patterns, causes, conditions, means and extent of child recruitment by age and gender; \\n\u00a7 The emotional and psychological consequences of children\u2019s living conditions and experiences and their gendered dimensions; \\n\u00a7 Attitudes, beliefs and norms regarding gender identities in armed forces and groups and in the community; \\n\u00a7 The attitudes of families and communities towards the conflict, and the extent of their resilience and capacities; \\n\u00a7 The absorption capacity of and support services necessary in communities of return, in particular families, which play a critical role in successful release and reintegration efforts; \\n\u00a7 The extent of children\u2019s participation in armed forces and groups, including roles played and gender, age or other differences; \\n\u00a7 Children\u2019s needs, expectations, and aspirations; \\n\u00a7 The evident obstacles to, and opportunities for, child and youth reintegration, with consideration of what risks and opportunities may arise in the future; and \\n\u00a7 The needs of, and challenges of working with, special groups (girls, girl mothers, disabled children, foreign children, young children, adolescents, male survivors of sexual violence, 16 severely distressed children, children displaying signs of post-traumatic stress disorder, and unaccompanied and separated children).", + "Paragraph": "A detailed situation analysis should assess broad conflict-related issues (location, political and social dynamics, causes, impacts, etc.) but also the specific impacts on children, including disaggregation by gender, age and location (urban-rural). The situation analysis is critical to identifying obstacles to, and opportunities for, reintegration support. A detailed situation analysis should examine: \n\u00a7 The objectives, tactics and command structure\/management\/hierarchy of the armed force or group; \n\u00a7 The circumstances, patterns, causes, conditions, means and extent of child recruitment by age and gender; \n\u00a7 The emotional and psychological consequences of children\u2019s living conditions and experiences and their gendered dimensions; \n\u00a7 Attitudes, beliefs and norms regarding gender identities in armed forces and groups and in the community; \n\u00a7 The attitudes of families and communities towards the conflict, and the extent of their resilience and capacities; \n\u00a7 The absorption capacity of and support services necessary in communities of return, in particular families, which play a critical role in successful release and reintegration efforts; \n\u00a7 The extent of children\u2019s participation in armed forces and groups, including roles played and gender, age or other differences; \n\u00a7 Children\u2019s needs, expectations, and aspirations; \n\u00a7 The evident obstacles to, and opportunities for, child and youth reintegration, with consideration of what risks and opportunities may arise in the future; and \n\u00a7 The needs of, and challenges of working with, special groups (girls, girl mothers, disabled children, foreign children, young children, adolescents, male survivors of sexual violence, 16 severely distressed children, children displaying signs of post-traumatic stress disorder, and unaccompanied and separated children).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -134839,7 +134839,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2262, - "Paragraph": "A detailed situation analysis should assess broad conflict-related issues (location, political and social dynamics, causes, impacts, etc.) but also the specific impacts on children, including disaggregation by gender, age and location (urban-rural). The situation analysis is critical to identifying obstacles to, and opportunities for, reintegration support. A detailed situation analysis should examine: \\n\u00a7 The objectives, tactics and command structure\/management\/hierarchy of the armed force or group; \\n\u00a7 The circumstances, patterns, causes, conditions, means and extent of child recruitment by age and gender; \\n\u00a7 The emotional and psychological consequences of children\u2019s living conditions and experiences and their gendered dimensions; \\n\u00a7 Attitudes, beliefs and norms regarding gender identities in armed forces and groups and in the community; \\n\u00a7 The attitudes of families and communities towards the conflict, and the extent of their resilience and capacities; \\n\u00a7 The absorption capacity of and support services necessary in communities of return, in particular families, which play a critical role in successful release and reintegration efforts; \\n\u00a7 The extent of children\u2019s participation in armed forces and groups, including roles played and gender, age or other differences; \\n\u00a7 Children\u2019s needs, expectations, and aspirations; \\n\u00a7 The evident obstacles to, and opportunities for, child and youth reintegration, with consideration of what risks and opportunities may arise in the future; and \\n\u00a7 The needs of, and challenges of working with, special groups (girls, girl mothers, disabled children, foreign children, young children, adolescents, male survivors of sexual violence, 16 severely distressed children, children displaying signs of post-traumatic stress disorder, and unaccompanied and separated children).", + "Paragraph": "A detailed situation analysis should assess broad conflict-related issues (location, political and social dynamics, causes, impacts, etc.) but also the specific impacts on children, including disaggregation by gender, age and location (urban-rural). The situation analysis is critical to identifying obstacles to, and opportunities for, reintegration support. A detailed situation analysis should examine: \n\u00a7 The objectives, tactics and command structure\/management\/hierarchy of the armed force or group; \n\u00a7 The circumstances, patterns, causes, conditions, means and extent of child recruitment by age and gender; \n\u00a7 The emotional and psychological consequences of children\u2019s living conditions and experiences and their gendered dimensions; \n\u00a7 Attitudes, beliefs and norms regarding gender identities in armed forces and groups and in the community; \n\u00a7 The attitudes of families and communities towards the conflict, and the extent of their resilience and capacities; \n\u00a7 The absorption capacity of and support services necessary in communities of return, in particular families, which play a critical role in successful release and reintegration efforts; \n\u00a7 The extent of children\u2019s participation in armed forces and groups, including roles played and gender, age or other differences; \n\u00a7 Children\u2019s needs, expectations, and aspirations; \n\u00a7 The evident obstacles to, and opportunities for, child and youth reintegration, with consideration of what risks and opportunities may arise in the future; and \n\u00a7 The needs of, and challenges of working with, special groups (girls, girl mothers, disabled children, foreign children, young children, adolescents, male survivors of sexual violence, 16 severely distressed children, children displaying signs of post-traumatic stress disorder, and unaccompanied and separated children).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -134850,7 +134850,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.1. Negotiating DDR: Ensuring women\u2019s political participation", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "A detailed situation analysis should examine: \\n\u00a7 The objectives, tactics and command structure\/management\/hierarchy of the armed force or group; \\n\u00a7 The circumstances, patterns, causes, conditions, means and extent of child recruitment by age and gender; \\n\u00a7 The emotional and psychological consequences of children\u2019s living conditions and experiences and their gendered dimensions; \\n\u00a7 Attitudes, beliefs and norms regarding gender identities in armed forces and groups and in the community; \\n\u00a7 The attitudes of families and communities towards the conflict, and the extent of their resilience and capacities; \\n\u00a7 The absorption capacity of and support services necessary in communities of return, in particular families, which play a critical role in successful release and reintegration efforts; \\n\u00a7 The extent of children\u2019s participation in armed forces and groups, including roles played and gender, age or other differences; \\n\u00a7 Children\u2019s needs, expectations, and aspirations; \\n\u00a7 The evident obstacles to, and opportunities for, child and youth reintegration, with consideration of what risks and opportunities may arise in the future; and \\n\u00a7 The needs of, and challenges of working with, special groups (girls, girl mothers, disabled children, foreign children, young children, adolescents, male survivors of sexual violence, 16 severely distressed children, children displaying signs of post-traumatic stress disorder, and unaccompanied and separated children).", + "Sentence": "A detailed situation analysis should examine: \n\u00a7 The objectives, tactics and command structure\/management\/hierarchy of the armed force or group; \n\u00a7 The circumstances, patterns, causes, conditions, means and extent of child recruitment by age and gender; \n\u00a7 The emotional and psychological consequences of children\u2019s living conditions and experiences and their gendered dimensions; \n\u00a7 Attitudes, beliefs and norms regarding gender identities in armed forces and groups and in the community; \n\u00a7 The attitudes of families and communities towards the conflict, and the extent of their resilience and capacities; \n\u00a7 The absorption capacity of and support services necessary in communities of return, in particular families, which play a critical role in successful release and reintegration efforts; \n\u00a7 The extent of children\u2019s participation in armed forces and groups, including roles played and gender, age or other differences; \n\u00a7 Children\u2019s needs, expectations, and aspirations; \n\u00a7 The evident obstacles to, and opportunities for, child and youth reintegration, with consideration of what risks and opportunities may arise in the future; and \n\u00a7 The needs of, and challenges of working with, special groups (girls, girl mothers, disabled children, foreign children, young children, adolescents, male survivors of sexual violence, 16 severely distressed children, children displaying signs of post-traumatic stress disorder, and unaccompanied and separated children).", "newParagraph": "detailed situation analysis ass broad conflictrelated issue location political social dynamic cause impact etc also specific impact child including disaggregation gender age location urbanrural situation analysis critical identifying obstacle opportunity reintegration support detailed situation analysis examine n objective tactic command structuremanagementhierarchy armed force group n circumstance pattern cause condition mean extent child recruitment age gender n emotional psychological consequence child living condition experience gendered dimension n attitude belief norm regarding gender identity armed force group community n attitude family community towards conflict extent resilience capacity n absorption capacity support service necessary community return particular family play critical role successful release reintegration effort n extent child participation armed force group including role played gender age difference n child need expectation aspiration n evident obstacle opportunity child youth reintegration consideration risk opportunity may arise future n need challenge working special group girl girl mother disabled child foreign child young child adolescent male survivor sexual violence 16 severely distressed child child displaying sign posttraumatic stress disorder unaccompanied separated child", "ProcessedSent": "detailed situation analysis examine n objective tactic command structuremanagementhierarchy armed force group n circumstance pattern cause condition mean extent child recruitment age gender n emotional psychological consequence child living condition experience gendered dimension n attitude belief norm regarding gender identity armed force group community n attitude family community towards conflict extent resilience capacity n absorption capacity support service necessary community return particular family play critical role successful release reintegration effort n extent child participation armed force group including role played gender age difference n child need expectation aspiration n evident obstacle opportunity child youth reintegration consideration risk opportunity may arise future n need challenge working special group girl girl mother disabled child foreign child young child adolescent male survivor sexual violence 16 severely distressed child child displaying sign posttraumatic stress disorder unaccompanied separated child", "SentID": 7491 @@ -134929,7 +134929,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -134940,14 +134940,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1. Negotiating DDR: Ensuring women\u2019s political participation", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context?", + "Sentence": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context?", "newParagraph": "box 1 key question context analysis n context social political economic cultural origin conflict perceived struggle liberation limited particular part country involve particular group people generalized demographic composition population direct impact conflict child impact different according background girl boy child perceived described stakeholder context n ideology armed force group member political ideology political social goal mean armed forcegroup use pursue ideology gender dimension ideology support armed forcegroup level perceived legitimacy armed forcegroup age genderbased norm practice feature armed forcegroup ideology n armed force group structured locus power many level hierarchy exist leadership tight control force role traditionally assigned child within forcegroup child associated armed force group report reporting boy girl authorityrank established make decision regarding movement armed forcegroup armed forcegroup foreign sponsor company organization n armed forcegroup focus particular ethnic religious geographic socioeconomic group recruitment child directly targeted recruitment girl boy targeted equally particular reason armed forcegroup may target recruitment girl boy armed forcegroup recruiting recruitment voluntary forced compulsory looking back three six twelve month recruitment increasing decreasing differ course year child promised anything join eg protection family money good weapon proportion child armed forcegroup n condition child live armed forcegroup child feel condition exploitation abuse long kind boy girl affected differently recruitment use armed forcegroup kind work child perform armed forcegroup 17 child behaviour changed result recruited attitude value changed childrens perception armed forcegroup recruitment n child recruited understand role conflict perceived benefit child join armed forcesgroups ie status recognition addressing grievance expectation aspiration future experience harnessed productive purpose n community feel impact conflict child community view role child armed force group impact likely child reintegration conflict affected perception role girl woman community perception sexual violence boy girl people understanding child responsibility conflict social cultural traditional practice exist help child reintegration community institution policy social group specific procedure service cater child specific need familiar child practice", "ProcessedSent": "box 1 key question context analysis n context", "SentID": 7496 }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -134965,7 +134965,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -134983,7 +134983,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135001,7 +135001,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135019,7 +135019,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135037,7 +135037,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135055,7 +135055,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135073,7 +135073,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135091,7 +135091,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135102,14 +135102,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1. Negotiating DDR: Ensuring women\u2019s political participation", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group?", + "Sentence": "\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group?", "newParagraph": "box 1 key question context analysis n context social political economic cultural origin conflict perceived struggle liberation limited particular part country involve particular group people generalized demographic composition population direct impact conflict child impact different according background girl boy child perceived described stakeholder context n ideology armed force group member political ideology political social goal mean armed forcegroup use pursue ideology gender dimension ideology support armed forcegroup level perceived legitimacy armed forcegroup age genderbased norm practice feature armed forcegroup ideology n armed force group structured locus power many level hierarchy exist leadership tight control force role traditionally assigned child within forcegroup child associated armed force group report reporting boy girl authorityrank established make decision regarding movement armed forcegroup armed forcegroup foreign sponsor company organization n armed forcegroup focus particular ethnic religious geographic socioeconomic group recruitment child directly targeted recruitment girl boy targeted equally particular reason armed forcegroup may target recruitment girl boy armed forcegroup recruiting recruitment voluntary forced compulsory looking back three six twelve month recruitment increasing decreasing differ course year child promised anything join eg protection family money good weapon proportion child armed forcegroup n condition child live armed forcegroup child feel condition exploitation abuse long kind boy girl affected differently recruitment use armed forcegroup kind work child perform armed forcegroup 17 child behaviour changed result recruited attitude value changed childrens perception armed forcegroup recruitment n child recruited understand role conflict perceived benefit child join armed forcesgroups ie status recognition addressing grievance expectation aspiration future experience harnessed productive purpose n community feel impact conflict child community view role child armed force group impact likely child reintegration conflict affected perception role girl woman community perception sexual violence boy girl people understanding child responsibility conflict social cultural traditional practice exist help child reintegration community institution policy social group specific procedure service cater child specific need familiar child practice", "ProcessedSent": "n ideology armed force group", "SentID": 7505 }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135127,7 +135127,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135145,7 +135145,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135163,7 +135163,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135181,7 +135181,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135199,7 +135199,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135217,7 +135217,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135235,7 +135235,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135246,14 +135246,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1. Negotiating DDR: Ensuring women\u2019s political participation", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n How is the armed force or group structured?", + "Sentence": "\n How is the armed force or group structured?", "newParagraph": "box 1 key question context analysis n context social political economic cultural origin conflict perceived struggle liberation limited particular part country involve particular group people generalized demographic composition population direct impact conflict child impact different according background girl boy child perceived described stakeholder context n ideology armed force group member political ideology political social goal mean armed forcegroup use pursue ideology gender dimension ideology support armed forcegroup level perceived legitimacy armed forcegroup age genderbased norm practice feature armed forcegroup ideology n armed force group structured locus power many level hierarchy exist leadership tight control force role traditionally assigned child within forcegroup child associated armed force group report reporting boy girl authorityrank established make decision regarding movement armed forcegroup armed forcegroup foreign sponsor company organization n armed forcegroup focus particular ethnic religious geographic socioeconomic group recruitment child directly targeted recruitment girl boy targeted equally particular reason armed forcegroup may target recruitment girl boy armed forcegroup recruiting recruitment voluntary forced compulsory looking back three six twelve month recruitment increasing decreasing differ course year child promised anything join eg protection family money good weapon proportion child armed forcegroup n condition child live armed forcegroup child feel condition exploitation abuse long kind boy girl affected differently recruitment use armed forcegroup kind work child perform armed forcegroup 17 child behaviour changed result recruited attitude value changed childrens perception armed forcegroup recruitment n child recruited understand role conflict perceived benefit child join armed forcesgroups ie status recognition addressing grievance expectation aspiration future experience harnessed productive purpose n community feel impact conflict child community view role child armed force group impact likely child reintegration conflict affected perception role girl woman community perception sexual violence boy girl people understanding child responsibility conflict social cultural traditional practice exist help child reintegration community institution policy social group specific procedure service cater child specific need familiar child practice", "ProcessedSent": "n armed force group structured", "SentID": 7513 }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135271,7 +135271,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135289,7 +135289,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135307,7 +135307,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135325,7 +135325,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135343,7 +135343,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135361,7 +135361,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135379,7 +135379,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135397,7 +135397,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135415,7 +135415,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135426,14 +135426,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1. Negotiating DDR: Ensuring women\u2019s political participation", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment?", + "Sentence": "\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment?", "newParagraph": "box 1 key question context analysis n context social political economic cultural origin conflict perceived struggle liberation limited particular part country involve particular group people generalized demographic composition population direct impact conflict child impact different according background girl boy child perceived described stakeholder context n ideology armed force group member political ideology political social goal mean armed forcegroup use pursue ideology gender dimension ideology support armed forcegroup level perceived legitimacy armed forcegroup age genderbased norm practice feature armed forcegroup ideology n armed force group structured locus power many level hierarchy exist leadership tight control force role traditionally assigned child within forcegroup child associated armed force group report reporting boy girl authorityrank established make decision regarding movement armed forcegroup armed forcegroup foreign sponsor company organization n armed forcegroup focus particular ethnic religious geographic socioeconomic group recruitment child directly targeted recruitment girl boy targeted equally particular reason armed forcegroup may target recruitment girl boy armed forcegroup recruiting recruitment voluntary forced compulsory looking back three six twelve month recruitment increasing decreasing differ course year child promised anything join eg protection family money good weapon proportion child armed forcegroup n condition child live armed forcegroup child feel condition exploitation abuse long kind boy girl affected differently recruitment use armed forcegroup kind work child perform armed forcegroup 17 child behaviour changed result recruited attitude value changed childrens perception armed forcegroup recruitment n child recruited understand role conflict perceived benefit child join armed forcesgroups ie status recognition addressing grievance expectation aspiration future experience harnessed productive purpose n community feel impact conflict child community view role child armed force group impact likely child reintegration conflict affected perception role girl woman community perception sexual violence boy girl people understanding child responsibility conflict social cultural traditional practice exist help child reintegration community institution policy social group specific procedure service cater child specific need familiar child practice", "ProcessedSent": "n armed forcegroup focus particular ethnic religious geographic socioeconomic group recruitment", "SentID": 7523 }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135451,7 +135451,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135469,7 +135469,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135487,7 +135487,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135505,7 +135505,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135523,7 +135523,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135541,7 +135541,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135559,7 +135559,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135577,7 +135577,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135588,14 +135588,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1. Negotiating DDR: Ensuring women\u2019s political participation", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group?", + "Sentence": "\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group?", "newParagraph": "box 1 key question context analysis n context social political economic cultural origin conflict perceived struggle liberation limited particular part country involve particular group people generalized demographic composition population direct impact conflict child impact different according background girl boy child perceived described stakeholder context n ideology armed force group member political ideology political social goal mean armed forcegroup use pursue ideology gender dimension ideology support armed forcegroup level perceived legitimacy armed forcegroup age genderbased norm practice feature armed forcegroup ideology n armed force group structured locus power many level hierarchy exist leadership tight control force role traditionally assigned child within forcegroup child associated armed force group report reporting boy girl authorityrank established make decision regarding movement armed forcegroup armed forcegroup foreign sponsor company organization n armed forcegroup focus particular ethnic religious geographic socioeconomic group recruitment child directly targeted recruitment girl boy targeted equally particular reason armed forcegroup may target recruitment girl boy armed forcegroup recruiting recruitment voluntary forced compulsory looking back three six twelve month recruitment increasing decreasing differ course year child promised anything join eg protection family money good weapon proportion child armed forcegroup n condition child live armed forcegroup child feel condition exploitation abuse long kind boy girl affected differently recruitment use armed forcegroup kind work child perform armed forcegroup 17 child behaviour changed result recruited attitude value changed childrens perception armed forcegroup recruitment n child recruited understand role conflict perceived benefit child join armed forcesgroups ie status recognition addressing grievance expectation aspiration future experience harnessed productive purpose n community feel impact conflict child community view role child armed force group impact likely child reintegration conflict affected perception role girl woman community perception sexual violence boy girl people understanding child responsibility conflict social cultural traditional practice exist help child reintegration community institution policy social group specific procedure service cater child specific need familiar child practice", "ProcessedSent": "n condition child live armed forcegroup", "SentID": 7532 }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135613,7 +135613,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135631,7 +135631,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135649,7 +135649,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135667,7 +135667,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135685,7 +135685,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135703,7 +135703,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135721,7 +135721,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135732,14 +135732,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1. Negotiating DDR: Ensuring women\u2019s political participation", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict?", + "Sentence": "\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict?", "newParagraph": "box 1 key question context analysis n context social political economic cultural origin conflict perceived struggle liberation limited particular part country involve particular group people generalized demographic composition population direct impact conflict child impact different according background girl boy child perceived described stakeholder context n ideology armed force group member political ideology political social goal mean armed forcegroup use pursue ideology gender dimension ideology support armed forcegroup level perceived legitimacy armed forcegroup age genderbased norm practice feature armed forcegroup ideology n armed force group structured locus power many level hierarchy exist leadership tight control force role traditionally assigned child within forcegroup child associated armed force group report reporting boy girl authorityrank established make decision regarding movement armed forcegroup armed forcegroup foreign sponsor company organization n armed forcegroup focus particular ethnic religious geographic socioeconomic group recruitment child directly targeted recruitment girl boy targeted equally particular reason armed forcegroup may target recruitment girl boy armed forcegroup recruiting recruitment voluntary forced compulsory looking back three six twelve month recruitment increasing decreasing differ course year child promised anything join eg protection family money good weapon proportion child armed forcegroup n condition child live armed forcegroup child feel condition exploitation abuse long kind boy girl affected differently recruitment use armed forcegroup kind work child perform armed forcegroup 17 child behaviour changed result recruited attitude value changed childrens perception armed forcegroup recruitment n child recruited understand role conflict perceived benefit child join armed forcesgroups ie status recognition addressing grievance expectation aspiration future experience harnessed productive purpose n community feel impact conflict child community view role child armed force group impact likely child reintegration conflict affected perception role girl woman community perception sexual violence boy girl people understanding child responsibility conflict social cultural traditional practice exist help child reintegration community institution policy social group specific procedure service cater child specific need familiar child practice", "ProcessedSent": "n child recruited understand role conflict", "SentID": 7540 }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135757,7 +135757,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135775,7 +135775,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135793,7 +135793,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135804,14 +135804,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1. Negotiating DDR: Ensuring women\u2019s political participation", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children?", + "Sentence": "\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children?", "newParagraph": "box 1 key question context analysis n context social political economic cultural origin conflict perceived struggle liberation limited particular part country involve particular group people generalized demographic composition population direct impact conflict child impact different according background girl boy child perceived described stakeholder context n ideology armed force group member political ideology political social goal mean armed forcegroup use pursue ideology gender dimension ideology support armed forcegroup level perceived legitimacy armed forcegroup age genderbased norm practice feature armed forcegroup ideology n armed force group structured locus power many level hierarchy exist leadership tight control force role traditionally assigned child within forcegroup child associated armed force group report reporting boy girl authorityrank established make decision regarding movement armed forcegroup armed forcegroup foreign sponsor company organization n armed forcegroup focus particular ethnic religious geographic socioeconomic group recruitment child directly targeted recruitment girl boy targeted equally particular reason armed forcegroup may target recruitment girl boy armed forcegroup recruiting recruitment voluntary forced compulsory looking back three six twelve month recruitment increasing decreasing differ course year child promised anything join eg protection family money good weapon proportion child armed forcegroup n condition child live armed forcegroup child feel condition exploitation abuse long kind boy girl affected differently recruitment use armed forcegroup kind work child perform armed forcegroup 17 child behaviour changed result recruited attitude value changed childrens perception armed forcegroup recruitment n child recruited understand role conflict perceived benefit child join armed forcesgroups ie status recognition addressing grievance expectation aspiration future experience harnessed productive purpose n community feel impact conflict child community view role child armed force group impact likely child reintegration conflict affected perception role girl woman community perception sexual violence boy girl people understanding child responsibility conflict social cultural traditional practice exist help child reintegration community institution policy social group specific procedure service cater child specific need familiar child practice", "ProcessedSent": "n community feel impact conflict child", "SentID": 7544 }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135829,7 +135829,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135847,7 +135847,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135865,7 +135865,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135883,7 +135883,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135901,7 +135901,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135919,7 +135919,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135937,7 +135937,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2264, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \\n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \\n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \\n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \\n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \\n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \\n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \\n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: KEY QUESTIONS FOR CONTEXT ANALYSIS \n What is the context? What are the social, political, economic and cultural origins of the conflict? Is it perceived as a struggle for liberation? Is it limited to a particular part of the country? Does it involve particular groups or people, or is it more generalized? What is the demographic composition of the population? What are the direct impacts of the conflict on children? Are the impacts different according to the background of the girls or boys? How are children perceived or described by other stakeholders in the context? \n What is the ideology of the armed force or group? Do its members have a political ideology? Do they have political, social or other goals? What means does the armed force\/group use to pursue its ideology? What are the gender dimensions of their ideology? Who supports the armed force\/group? What is the level of perceived legitimacy of the armed force\/group? How does age- and gender-based norms and practices feature in the armed force\/group\u2019s ideology? \n How is the armed force or group structured? Where is the locus of power? How many levels of hierarchy exist? Does the leadership have tight control over its forces? What roles are traditionally assigned to children within the force\/group? Whom do children associated with armed forces and groups report to? Is reporting the same for boys and girls? How is authority\/rank established? Who makes decisions regarding the movements of the armed force\/group? Has the armed force\/group had foreign sponsors (companies, organizations)? \n Does the armed force\/group focus on particular ethnic, religious, geographic or socioeconomic groups for recruitment? Are children directly targeted for recruitment? Are girls and boys targeted equally? Is there a particular reason why the armed force\/group may target the recruitment of girls and boys? Where does the armed force\/group do most of its recruiting? Is recruitment \u2018voluntary\u2019, forced or compulsory? Looking back over three, six and twelve months, has recruitment been increasing or decreasing, and does it differ over the course of the year? Are children promised anything when they join up (e.g., protection for their families, money, goods, weapons)? What is the proportion of children in the armed force\/group? \n What conditions did the children live in while in the armed force\/group? How do the children feel about their conditions? Was there exploitation or abuse, and if so, for how long and of what kind? How are boys and girls affected differently by their recruitment and use by the armed force\/group? What kind of work did children perform in the armed force\/group? How has 17 children\u2019s behaviour changed as a result of being recruited? Have their attitudes and values changed? What were the children's perceptions of the armed force\/group before recruitment? \n How do children recruited understand their role in the conflict? Are there any perceived benefits for children to join armed forces\/groups (i.e., status recognition, addressing grievances)? What are their expectations and aspirations for the future? How can their experiences be harnessed for productive purposes? \n What do the communities feel about the impact of the conflict on children? How do communities view the role of children in armed forces and groups? What impact is this likely to have on the children\u2019s reintegration? How has the conflict affected perceptions of the roles of girls and women? What are the community\u2019s perceptions of sexual violence against boys and girls? What is the people\u2019s understanding of children\u2019s responsibility in the conflict? What social, cultural and traditional practices exist to help children\u2019s reintegration into their communities? Do institutions, policies and social groups have specific procedures or services to cater for children\u2019s specific needs? How familiar are children with these practices?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135955,7 +135955,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2265, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \\n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \\n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \\n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \\n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \\n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \\n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \\n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \\n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135973,7 +135973,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2265, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \\n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \\n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \\n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \\n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \\n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \\n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \\n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \\n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -135984,14 +135984,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.2 Assessment phase", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \\n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments.", + "Sentence": "These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments.", "newParagraph": "addition context analysis ddr practitioner child protection actor take following minimum preparedness action consideration planning action outlined informed interagency standing committee emergency response preparedness guideline 2015 n risk monitoring activity ongoing throughout implementation based initial risk assessment plan developed detailing action conducted caafag specific risk might include rerecruitment lack access ddr process unidentified psychosocial trauma family community abuse stigmatization sexual genderbased violence risk monitoring specifically consider need girl age n risk monitoring especially critical child selfdemobilize return community ongoing conflict result disaggregated ensure girl particularly vulnerable group considered n clearly defined coordination management arrangement critical ensuring childsensitive approach ddr process particularly given complexity process need transparency accountability generate community support ddr process child involve number agency stakeholder national international require comprehensive planning regarding body coordinate report opportunity child able report provide feedback ddr process safe confidential manner shall ensured moreover exit strategy feature within coordinated approach n need assessment information management response monitoring arrangement must central planning process need boy girl caafag multifaceted may change time robust need assessment ongoing monitoring reintegration process child essential minimize risk identify opportunity extended support ensure effective 18 protection child especially vulnerable child involved ddr effective information management priority include disaggregated data age sex ethnicity location valid variable enable ddr practitioner child protection actor proactively adapt approach need emerge important note organization working child fully respect right confidentiality data subject act accordance harm principle best interest child n case management system communitybased ideally fit within existing communitybased structure case management system used tailor type support child need link sexual andor genderbased violence case management system provide specialized support child need reintegration child tailored individual need child time case management system best address need build case management system community long term n reintegration opportunity service including market analysis critical inform effective response support sustainable economic reintegration child used conjunction socioeconomic profile enable development solution meet market demand well expectation child participant beneficiary taking account gendered sociocultural dynamic see iddrs 530 youth ddr section 7 8 information n operational capacity arrangement deliver reintegration outcome ensure protection essential ddr process child plan put place enhance institutional capacity relevant stakeholder including un agency national local government civil society sectorsclusters necessary negotiation capacity also considered situation child continue retained armed force group capacity local service provider business community directly involved daily basis reintegration process also supported n contingency plan linked risk analysis monitoring system developed ensure ddr process child retain enough flexibility adapt changing circumstance", "ProcessedSent": "action outlined informed interagency standing committee emergency response preparedness guideline 2015 n risk monitoring activity ongoing throughout implementation based initial risk assessment", "SentID": 7554 }, { "ParagraphID": 2265, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \\n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \\n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \\n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \\n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \\n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \\n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \\n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \\n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -136009,7 +136009,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2265, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \\n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \\n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \\n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \\n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \\n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \\n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \\n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \\n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -136027,7 +136027,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2265, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \\n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \\n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \\n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \\n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \\n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \\n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \\n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \\n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -136045,7 +136045,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2265, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \\n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \\n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \\n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \\n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \\n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \\n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \\n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \\n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -136056,14 +136056,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.2 Assessment phase", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict.", + "Sentence": "\n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict.", "newParagraph": "addition context analysis ddr practitioner child protection actor take following minimum preparedness action consideration planning action outlined informed interagency standing committee emergency response preparedness guideline 2015 n risk monitoring activity ongoing throughout implementation based initial risk assessment plan developed detailing action conducted caafag specific risk might include rerecruitment lack access ddr process unidentified psychosocial trauma family community abuse stigmatization sexual genderbased violence risk monitoring specifically consider need girl age n risk monitoring especially critical child selfdemobilize return community ongoing conflict result disaggregated ensure girl particularly vulnerable group considered n clearly defined coordination management arrangement critical ensuring childsensitive approach ddr process particularly given complexity process need transparency accountability generate community support ddr process child involve number agency stakeholder national international require comprehensive planning regarding body coordinate report opportunity child able report provide feedback ddr process safe confidential manner shall ensured moreover exit strategy feature within coordinated approach n need assessment information management response monitoring arrangement must central planning process need boy girl caafag multifaceted may change time robust need assessment ongoing monitoring reintegration process child essential minimize risk identify opportunity extended support ensure effective 18 protection child especially vulnerable child involved ddr effective information management priority include disaggregated data age sex ethnicity location valid variable enable ddr practitioner child protection actor proactively adapt approach need emerge important note organization working child fully respect right confidentiality data subject act accordance harm principle best interest child n case management system communitybased ideally fit within existing communitybased structure case management system used tailor type support child need link sexual andor genderbased violence case management system provide specialized support child need reintegration child tailored individual need child time case management system best address need build case management system community long term n reintegration opportunity service including market analysis critical inform effective response support sustainable economic reintegration child used conjunction socioeconomic profile enable development solution meet market demand well expectation child participant beneficiary taking account gendered sociocultural dynamic see iddrs 530 youth ddr section 7 8 information n operational capacity arrangement deliver reintegration outcome ensure protection essential ddr process child plan put place enhance institutional capacity relevant stakeholder including un agency national local government civil society sectorsclusters necessary negotiation capacity also considered situation child continue retained armed force group capacity local service provider business community directly involved daily basis reintegration process also supported n contingency plan linked risk analysis monitoring system developed ensure ddr process child retain enough flexibility adapt changing circumstance", "ProcessedSent": "n risk monitoring especially critical child selfdemobilize return community ongoing conflict", "SentID": 7558 }, { "ParagraphID": 2265, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \\n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \\n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \\n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \\n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \\n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \\n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \\n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \\n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -136081,7 +136081,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2265, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \\n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \\n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \\n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \\n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \\n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \\n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \\n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \\n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -136092,14 +136092,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.2 Assessment phase", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support.", + "Sentence": "\n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support.", "newParagraph": "addition context analysis ddr practitioner child protection actor take following minimum preparedness action consideration planning action outlined informed interagency standing committee emergency response preparedness guideline 2015 n risk monitoring activity ongoing throughout implementation based initial risk assessment plan developed detailing action conducted caafag specific risk might include rerecruitment lack access ddr process unidentified psychosocial trauma family community abuse stigmatization sexual genderbased violence risk monitoring specifically consider need girl age n risk monitoring especially critical child selfdemobilize return community ongoing conflict result disaggregated ensure girl particularly vulnerable group considered n clearly defined coordination management arrangement critical ensuring childsensitive approach ddr process particularly given complexity process need transparency accountability generate community support ddr process child involve number agency stakeholder national international require comprehensive planning regarding body coordinate report opportunity child able report provide feedback ddr process safe confidential manner shall ensured moreover exit strategy feature within coordinated approach n need assessment information management response monitoring arrangement must central planning process need boy girl caafag multifaceted may change time robust need assessment ongoing monitoring reintegration process child essential minimize risk identify opportunity extended support ensure effective 18 protection child especially vulnerable child involved ddr effective information management priority include disaggregated data age sex ethnicity location valid variable enable ddr practitioner child protection actor proactively adapt approach need emerge important note organization working child fully respect right confidentiality data subject act accordance harm principle best interest child n case management system communitybased ideally fit within existing communitybased structure case management system used tailor type support child need link sexual andor genderbased violence case management system provide specialized support child need reintegration child tailored individual need child time case management system best address need build case management system community long term n reintegration opportunity service including market analysis critical inform effective response support sustainable economic reintegration child used conjunction socioeconomic profile enable development solution meet market demand well expectation child participant beneficiary taking account gendered sociocultural dynamic see iddrs 530 youth ddr section 7 8 information n operational capacity arrangement deliver reintegration outcome ensure protection essential ddr process child plan put place enhance institutional capacity relevant stakeholder including un agency national local government civil society sectorsclusters necessary negotiation capacity also considered situation child continue retained armed force group capacity local service provider business community directly involved daily basis reintegration process also supported n contingency plan linked risk analysis monitoring system developed ensure ddr process child retain enough flexibility adapt changing circumstance", "ProcessedSent": "n clearly defined coordination management arrangement critical ensuring childsensitive approach ddr process particularly given complexity process need transparency accountability generate community support", "SentID": 7560 }, { "ParagraphID": 2265, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \\n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \\n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \\n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \\n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \\n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \\n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \\n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \\n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -136117,7 +136117,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2265, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \\n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \\n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \\n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \\n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \\n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \\n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \\n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \\n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -136135,7 +136135,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2265, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \\n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \\n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \\n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \\n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \\n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \\n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \\n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \\n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -136153,7 +136153,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2265, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \\n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \\n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \\n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \\n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \\n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \\n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \\n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \\n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -136164,14 +136164,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.2 Assessment phase", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process.", + "Sentence": "\n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process.", "newParagraph": "addition context analysis ddr practitioner child protection actor take following minimum preparedness action consideration planning action outlined informed interagency standing committee emergency response preparedness guideline 2015 n risk monitoring activity ongoing throughout implementation based initial risk assessment plan developed detailing action conducted caafag specific risk might include rerecruitment lack access ddr process unidentified psychosocial trauma family community abuse stigmatization sexual genderbased violence risk monitoring specifically consider need girl age n risk monitoring especially critical child selfdemobilize return community ongoing conflict result disaggregated ensure girl particularly vulnerable group considered n clearly defined coordination management arrangement critical ensuring childsensitive approach ddr process particularly given complexity process need transparency accountability generate community support ddr process child involve number agency stakeholder national international require comprehensive planning regarding body coordinate report opportunity child able report provide feedback ddr process safe confidential manner shall ensured moreover exit strategy feature within coordinated approach n need assessment information management response monitoring arrangement must central planning process need boy girl caafag multifaceted may change time robust need assessment ongoing monitoring reintegration process child essential minimize risk identify opportunity extended support ensure effective 18 protection child especially vulnerable child involved ddr effective information management priority include disaggregated data age sex ethnicity location valid variable enable ddr practitioner child protection actor proactively adapt approach need emerge important note organization working child fully respect right confidentiality data subject act accordance harm principle best interest child n case management system communitybased ideally fit within existing communitybased structure case management system used tailor type support child need link sexual andor genderbased violence case management system provide specialized support child need reintegration child tailored individual need child time case management system best address need build case management system community long term n reintegration opportunity service including market analysis critical inform effective response support sustainable economic reintegration child used conjunction socioeconomic profile enable development solution meet market demand well expectation child participant beneficiary taking account gendered sociocultural dynamic see iddrs 530 youth ddr section 7 8 information n operational capacity arrangement deliver reintegration outcome ensure protection essential ddr process child plan put place enhance institutional capacity relevant stakeholder including un agency national local government civil society sectorsclusters necessary negotiation capacity also considered situation child continue retained armed force group capacity local service provider business community directly involved daily basis reintegration process also supported n contingency plan linked risk analysis monitoring system developed ensure ddr process child retain enough flexibility adapt changing circumstance", "ProcessedSent": "n need assessment information management response monitoring arrangement must central planning process", "SentID": 7564 }, { "ParagraphID": 2265, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \\n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \\n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \\n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \\n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \\n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \\n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \\n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \\n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -136189,7 +136189,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2265, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \\n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \\n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \\n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \\n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \\n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \\n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \\n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \\n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -136207,7 +136207,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2265, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \\n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \\n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \\n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \\n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \\n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \\n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \\n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \\n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -136225,7 +136225,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2265, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \\n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \\n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \\n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \\n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \\n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \\n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \\n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \\n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -136243,7 +136243,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2265, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \\n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \\n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \\n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \\n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \\n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \\n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \\n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \\n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -136254,14 +136254,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.2 Assessment phase", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures.", + "Sentence": "\n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures.", "newParagraph": "addition context analysis ddr practitioner child protection actor take following minimum preparedness action consideration planning action outlined informed interagency standing committee emergency response preparedness guideline 2015 n risk monitoring activity ongoing throughout implementation based initial risk assessment plan developed detailing action conducted caafag specific risk might include rerecruitment lack access ddr process unidentified psychosocial trauma family community abuse stigmatization sexual genderbased violence risk monitoring specifically consider need girl age n risk monitoring especially critical child selfdemobilize return community ongoing conflict result disaggregated ensure girl particularly vulnerable group considered n clearly defined coordination management arrangement critical ensuring childsensitive approach ddr process particularly given complexity process need transparency accountability generate community support ddr process child involve number agency stakeholder national international require comprehensive planning regarding body coordinate report opportunity child able report provide feedback ddr process safe confidential manner shall ensured moreover exit strategy feature within coordinated approach n need assessment information management response monitoring arrangement must central planning process need boy girl caafag multifaceted may change time robust need assessment ongoing monitoring reintegration process child essential minimize risk identify opportunity extended support ensure effective 18 protection child especially vulnerable child involved ddr effective information management priority include disaggregated data age sex ethnicity location valid variable enable ddr practitioner child protection actor proactively adapt approach need emerge important note organization working child fully respect right confidentiality data subject act accordance harm principle best interest child n case management system communitybased ideally fit within existing communitybased structure case management system used tailor type support child need link sexual andor genderbased violence case management system provide specialized support child need reintegration child tailored individual need child time case management system best address need build case management system community long term n reintegration opportunity service including market analysis critical inform effective response support sustainable economic reintegration child used conjunction socioeconomic profile enable development solution meet market demand well expectation child participant beneficiary taking account gendered sociocultural dynamic see iddrs 530 youth ddr section 7 8 information n operational capacity arrangement deliver reintegration outcome ensure protection essential ddr process child plan put place enhance institutional capacity relevant stakeholder including un agency national local government civil society sectorsclusters necessary negotiation capacity also considered situation child continue retained armed force group capacity local service provider business community directly involved daily basis reintegration process also supported n contingency plan linked risk analysis monitoring system developed ensure ddr process child retain enough flexibility adapt changing circumstance", "ProcessedSent": "n case management system communitybased ideally fit within existing communitybased structure", "SentID": 7569 }, { "ParagraphID": 2265, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \\n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \\n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \\n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \\n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \\n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \\n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \\n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \\n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -136279,7 +136279,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2265, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \\n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \\n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \\n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \\n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \\n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \\n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \\n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \\n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -136297,7 +136297,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2265, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \\n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \\n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \\n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \\n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \\n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \\n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \\n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \\n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -136308,14 +136308,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.2 Assessment phase", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children.", + "Sentence": "\n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children.", "newParagraph": "addition context analysis ddr practitioner child protection actor take following minimum preparedness action consideration planning action outlined informed interagency standing committee emergency response preparedness guideline 2015 n risk monitoring activity ongoing throughout implementation based initial risk assessment plan developed detailing action conducted caafag specific risk might include rerecruitment lack access ddr process unidentified psychosocial trauma family community abuse stigmatization sexual genderbased violence risk monitoring specifically consider need girl age n risk monitoring especially critical child selfdemobilize return community ongoing conflict result disaggregated ensure girl particularly vulnerable group considered n clearly defined coordination management arrangement critical ensuring childsensitive approach ddr process particularly given complexity process need transparency accountability generate community support ddr process child involve number agency stakeholder national international require comprehensive planning regarding body coordinate report opportunity child able report provide feedback ddr process safe confidential manner shall ensured moreover exit strategy feature within coordinated approach n need assessment information management response monitoring arrangement must central planning process need boy girl caafag multifaceted may change time robust need assessment ongoing monitoring reintegration process child essential minimize risk identify opportunity extended support ensure effective 18 protection child especially vulnerable child involved ddr effective information management priority include disaggregated data age sex ethnicity location valid variable enable ddr practitioner child protection actor proactively adapt approach need emerge important note organization working child fully respect right confidentiality data subject act accordance harm principle best interest child n case management system communitybased ideally fit within existing communitybased structure case management system used tailor type support child need link sexual andor genderbased violence case management system provide specialized support child need reintegration child tailored individual need child time case management system best address need build case management system community long term n reintegration opportunity service including market analysis critical inform effective response support sustainable economic reintegration child used conjunction socioeconomic profile enable development solution meet market demand well expectation child participant beneficiary taking account gendered sociocultural dynamic see iddrs 530 youth ddr section 7 8 information n operational capacity arrangement deliver reintegration outcome ensure protection essential ddr process child plan put place enhance institutional capacity relevant stakeholder including un agency national local government civil society sectorsclusters necessary negotiation capacity also considered situation child continue retained armed force group capacity local service provider business community directly involved daily basis reintegration process also supported n contingency plan linked risk analysis monitoring system developed ensure ddr process child retain enough flexibility adapt changing circumstance", "ProcessedSent": "n reintegration opportunity service including market analysis critical inform effective response support sustainable economic reintegration child", "SentID": 7572 }, { "ParagraphID": 2265, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \\n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \\n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \\n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \\n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \\n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \\n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \\n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \\n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -136333,7 +136333,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2265, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \\n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \\n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \\n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \\n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \\n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \\n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \\n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \\n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -136351,7 +136351,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2265, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \\n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \\n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \\n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \\n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \\n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \\n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \\n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \\n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -136362,14 +136362,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.2 Assessment phase", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children.", + "Sentence": "\n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children.", "newParagraph": "addition context analysis ddr practitioner child protection actor take following minimum preparedness action consideration planning action outlined informed interagency standing committee emergency response preparedness guideline 2015 n risk monitoring activity ongoing throughout implementation based initial risk assessment plan developed detailing action conducted caafag specific risk might include rerecruitment lack access ddr process unidentified psychosocial trauma family community abuse stigmatization sexual genderbased violence risk monitoring specifically consider need girl age n risk monitoring especially critical child selfdemobilize return community ongoing conflict result disaggregated ensure girl particularly vulnerable group considered n clearly defined coordination management arrangement critical ensuring childsensitive approach ddr process particularly given complexity process need transparency accountability generate community support ddr process child involve number agency stakeholder national international require comprehensive planning regarding body coordinate report opportunity child able report provide feedback ddr process safe confidential manner shall ensured moreover exit strategy feature within coordinated approach n need assessment information management response monitoring arrangement must central planning process need boy girl caafag multifaceted may change time robust need assessment ongoing monitoring reintegration process child essential minimize risk identify opportunity extended support ensure effective 18 protection child especially vulnerable child involved ddr effective information management priority include disaggregated data age sex ethnicity location valid variable enable ddr practitioner child protection actor proactively adapt approach need emerge important note organization working child fully respect right confidentiality data subject act accordance harm principle best interest child n case management system communitybased ideally fit within existing communitybased structure case management system used tailor type support child need link sexual andor genderbased violence case management system provide specialized support child need reintegration child tailored individual need child time case management system best address need build case management system community long term n reintegration opportunity service including market analysis critical inform effective response support sustainable economic reintegration child used conjunction socioeconomic profile enable development solution meet market demand well expectation child participant beneficiary taking account gendered sociocultural dynamic see iddrs 530 youth ddr section 7 8 information n operational capacity arrangement deliver reintegration outcome ensure protection essential ddr process child plan put place enhance institutional capacity relevant stakeholder including un agency national local government civil society sectorsclusters necessary negotiation capacity also considered situation child continue retained armed force group capacity local service provider business community directly involved daily basis reintegration process also supported n contingency plan linked risk analysis monitoring system developed ensure ddr process child retain enough flexibility adapt changing circumstance", "ProcessedSent": "n operational capacity arrangement deliver reintegration outcome ensure protection essential ddr process child", "SentID": 7575 }, { "ParagraphID": 2265, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \\n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \\n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \\n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \\n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \\n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \\n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \\n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \\n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -136387,7 +136387,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2265, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \\n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \\n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \\n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \\n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \\n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \\n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \\n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \\n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -136405,7 +136405,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2265, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \\n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \\n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \\n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \\n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \\n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \\n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \\n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \\n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -136423,7 +136423,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2265, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \\n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \\n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \\n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \\n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \\n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \\n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \\n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \\n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the context analysis, DDR practitioners and child protection actors should take the following Minimum Preparedness Actions into consideration when planning. These actions (outlined below) are informed by the Interagency Standing Committee\u2019s Emergency Response Preparedness Guidelines (2015): \n Risk monitoring is an activity that should be ongoing throughout implementation, based on initial risk assessments. Plans should be developed detailing how this action will be conducted. For CAAFAG, specific risks might include (re-)recruitment; lack of access to DDR processes; unidentified psychosocial trauma; family or community abuse; stigmatization; and sexual and gender-based violence. Risk monitoring should specifically consider the needs of girls of all ages. \n Risk monitoring is especially critical when children self-demobilize and return to communities during ongoing conflict. Results should be disaggregated to ensure that girls and other particularly vulnerable groups are considered. \n Clearly defined coordination and management arrangements are critical to ensuring a child-sensitive approach for DDR processes, particularly given the complexity of the process and the need for transparency and accountability to generate community support. DDR processes for children involve a number of agencies and stakeholders (national and international) and require comprehensive planning regarding how these bodies will coordinate and report. The opportunity for children to be able to report and provide feedback on DDR processes in a safe and confidential manner shall be ensured. Moreover, an exit strategy should feature within a coordinated approach. \n Needs assessments, information management and response monitoring arrangements must be central to any planning process. The needs of boy and girl CAAFAG are multifaceted and may change over time. A robust needs assessment and ongoing monitoring of the reintegration process for children is essential to minimize risk, identify opportunities for extended support and ensure the effective 18 protection of all children \u2013 especially vulnerable children \u2013 involved in DDR. Effective information management should be a priority and should include disaggregated data (by age, sex, ethnicity, location, or any other valid variable) to enable DDR practitioners and child protection actors to proactively adapt their approaches as needs emerge. It is important to note that all organizations working with children should fully respect the rights and confidentiality of data subjects, and act in accordance with the \u201cdo no harm\u201d principle and the best interests of children. \n Case management systems should be community-based and, ideally, fit within existing community-based structures. Case management systems should be used to tailor the types of support that each child needs and should link to sexual and\/or gender-based violence case management systems that provide specialized support for children who need it. Because reintegration of children is tailored to the individual needs of a child over time, a case management system is best to both address those needs and to build up case management systems in communities for the long term. \n Reintegration opportunities and services, including market analysis are critical to inform an effective response that supports the sustainable economic reintegration of children. They should be used in conjunction with socioeconomic profiles to enable the development of solutions that meet market demand as well as the expectations of child participants and beneficiaries, taking into account gendered socio-cultural dynamics. See IDDRS 5.30 on Youth and DDR, sections 7 and 8, for more information. \n Operational capacity and arrangements to deliver reintegration outcomes and ensure protection are essential to DDR processes for children. Plans should be put in place to enhance the institutional capacity of relevant stakeholders (including UN agencies, national and local Governments, civil society and sectors\/clusters) where necessary. Negotiation capacity should also be considered in situations where children continue to be retained by armed forces and groups. The capacity of local service providers, businesses and communities, all of which will be directly involved on a daily basis in the reintegration process, should also be supported. \n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -136434,7 +136434,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.2 Assessment phase", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", + "Sentence": "\n Contingency plans, linked to the risk analysis and monitoring system, should be developed to ensure that DDR processes for children retain enough flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances.", "newParagraph": "addition context analysis ddr practitioner child protection actor take following minimum preparedness action consideration planning action outlined informed interagency standing committee emergency response preparedness guideline 2015 n risk monitoring activity ongoing throughout implementation based initial risk assessment plan developed detailing action conducted caafag specific risk might include rerecruitment lack access ddr process unidentified psychosocial trauma family community abuse stigmatization sexual genderbased violence risk monitoring specifically consider need girl age n risk monitoring especially critical child selfdemobilize return community ongoing conflict result disaggregated ensure girl particularly vulnerable group considered n clearly defined coordination management arrangement critical ensuring childsensitive approach ddr process particularly given complexity process need transparency accountability generate community support ddr process child involve number agency stakeholder national international require comprehensive planning regarding body coordinate report opportunity child able report provide feedback ddr process safe confidential manner shall ensured moreover exit strategy feature within coordinated approach n need assessment information management response monitoring arrangement must central planning process need boy girl caafag multifaceted may change time robust need assessment ongoing monitoring reintegration process child essential minimize risk identify opportunity extended support ensure effective 18 protection child especially vulnerable child involved ddr effective information management priority include disaggregated data age sex ethnicity location valid variable enable ddr practitioner child protection actor proactively adapt approach need emerge important note organization working child fully respect right confidentiality data subject act accordance harm principle best interest child n case management system communitybased ideally fit within existing communitybased structure case management system used tailor type support child need link sexual andor genderbased violence case management system provide specialized support child need reintegration child tailored individual need child time case management system best address need build case management system community long term n reintegration opportunity service including market analysis critical inform effective response support sustainable economic reintegration child used conjunction socioeconomic profile enable development solution meet market demand well expectation child participant beneficiary taking account gendered sociocultural dynamic see iddrs 530 youth ddr section 7 8 information n operational capacity arrangement deliver reintegration outcome ensure protection essential ddr process child plan put place enhance institutional capacity relevant stakeholder including un agency national local government civil society sectorsclusters necessary negotiation capacity also considered situation child continue retained armed force group capacity local service provider business community directly involved daily basis reintegration process also supported n contingency plan linked risk analysis monitoring system developed ensure ddr process child retain enough flexibility adapt changing circumstance", "ProcessedSent": "n contingency plan linked risk analysis monitoring system developed ensure ddr process child retain enough flexibility adapt changing circumstance", "SentID": 7579 @@ -136981,7 +136981,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2271, - "Paragraph": "The specific needs of girls and boys shall be fully considered in all stages of DDR processes. A gender-transformative approach should be pursued, aiming to shift social norms and address structural inequalities that lead girls and boys to engage in armed conflict and that negatively affect their reintegration. Within DDR processes, a gender-transformative approach shall focus on the following: \\n Agency: Interventions should strengthen the individual and collective capacities (knowledge and skills), attitudes, critical reflection, assets, actions and access to services that support the reintegration of girls. \\n Relations: Interventions should equip girls with the skills to navigate the expectations and cooperative or negotiation dynamics embedded within relationships between people in the home, market, community, and groups and organizations that will influence choice. \\n Structures: Interventions should address the informal and formal institutional rules and practices, social norms and statuses that limit options available to girls and work to create space for their empowerment.", + "Paragraph": "The specific needs of girls and boys shall be fully considered in all stages of DDR processes. A gender-transformative approach should be pursued, aiming to shift social norms and address structural inequalities that lead girls and boys to engage in armed conflict and that negatively affect their reintegration. Within DDR processes, a gender-transformative approach shall focus on the following: \n Agency: Interventions should strengthen the individual and collective capacities (knowledge and skills), attitudes, critical reflection, assets, actions and access to services that support the reintegration of girls. \n Relations: Interventions should equip girls with the skills to navigate the expectations and cooperative or negotiation dynamics embedded within relationships between people in the home, market, community, and groups and organizations that will influence choice. \n Structures: Interventions should address the informal and formal institutional rules and practices, social norms and statuses that limit options available to girls and work to create space for their empowerment.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -136999,7 +136999,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2271, - "Paragraph": "The specific needs of girls and boys shall be fully considered in all stages of DDR processes. A gender-transformative approach should be pursued, aiming to shift social norms and address structural inequalities that lead girls and boys to engage in armed conflict and that negatively affect their reintegration. Within DDR processes, a gender-transformative approach shall focus on the following: \\n Agency: Interventions should strengthen the individual and collective capacities (knowledge and skills), attitudes, critical reflection, assets, actions and access to services that support the reintegration of girls. \\n Relations: Interventions should equip girls with the skills to navigate the expectations and cooperative or negotiation dynamics embedded within relationships between people in the home, market, community, and groups and organizations that will influence choice. \\n Structures: Interventions should address the informal and formal institutional rules and practices, social norms and statuses that limit options available to girls and work to create space for their empowerment.", + "Paragraph": "The specific needs of girls and boys shall be fully considered in all stages of DDR processes. A gender-transformative approach should be pursued, aiming to shift social norms and address structural inequalities that lead girls and boys to engage in armed conflict and that negatively affect their reintegration. Within DDR processes, a gender-transformative approach shall focus on the following: \n Agency: Interventions should strengthen the individual and collective capacities (knowledge and skills), attitudes, critical reflection, assets, actions and access to services that support the reintegration of girls. \n Relations: Interventions should equip girls with the skills to navigate the expectations and cooperative or negotiation dynamics embedded within relationships between people in the home, market, community, and groups and organizations that will influence choice. \n Structures: Interventions should address the informal and formal institutional rules and practices, social norms and statuses that limit options available to girls and work to create space for their empowerment.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -137017,7 +137017,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2271, - "Paragraph": "The specific needs of girls and boys shall be fully considered in all stages of DDR processes. A gender-transformative approach should be pursued, aiming to shift social norms and address structural inequalities that lead girls and boys to engage in armed conflict and that negatively affect their reintegration. Within DDR processes, a gender-transformative approach shall focus on the following: \\n Agency: Interventions should strengthen the individual and collective capacities (knowledge and skills), attitudes, critical reflection, assets, actions and access to services that support the reintegration of girls. \\n Relations: Interventions should equip girls with the skills to navigate the expectations and cooperative or negotiation dynamics embedded within relationships between people in the home, market, community, and groups and organizations that will influence choice. \\n Structures: Interventions should address the informal and formal institutional rules and practices, social norms and statuses that limit options available to girls and work to create space for their empowerment.", + "Paragraph": "The specific needs of girls and boys shall be fully considered in all stages of DDR processes. A gender-transformative approach should be pursued, aiming to shift social norms and address structural inequalities that lead girls and boys to engage in armed conflict and that negatively affect their reintegration. Within DDR processes, a gender-transformative approach shall focus on the following: \n Agency: Interventions should strengthen the individual and collective capacities (knowledge and skills), attitudes, critical reflection, assets, actions and access to services that support the reintegration of girls. \n Relations: Interventions should equip girls with the skills to navigate the expectations and cooperative or negotiation dynamics embedded within relationships between people in the home, market, community, and groups and organizations that will influence choice. \n Structures: Interventions should address the informal and formal institutional rules and practices, social norms and statuses that limit options available to girls and work to create space for their empowerment.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -137028,14 +137028,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.3 Data", "Heading3": "6.3.3 Gender responsive and transformative", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Within DDR processes, a gender-transformative approach shall focus on the following: \\n Agency: Interventions should strengthen the individual and collective capacities (knowledge and skills), attitudes, critical reflection, assets, actions and access to services that support the reintegration of girls.", + "Sentence": "Within DDR processes, a gender-transformative approach shall focus on the following: \n Agency: Interventions should strengthen the individual and collective capacities (knowledge and skills), attitudes, critical reflection, assets, actions and access to services that support the reintegration of girls.", "newParagraph": "specific need girl boy shall fully considered stage ddr process gendertransformative approach pursued aiming shift social norm address structural inequality lead girl boy engage armed conflict negatively affect reintegration within ddr process gendertransformative approach shall focus following n agency intervention strengthen individual collective capacity knowledge skill attitude critical reflection asset action access service support reintegration girl n relation intervention equip girl skill navigate expectation cooperative negotiation dynamic embedded within relationship people home market community group organization influence choice n structure intervention address informal formal institutional rule practice social norm status limit option available girl work create space empowerment", "ProcessedSent": "within ddr process gendertransformative approach shall focus following n agency intervention strengthen individual collective capacity knowledge skill attitude critical reflection asset action access service support reintegration girl", "SentID": 7612 }, { "ParagraphID": 2271, - "Paragraph": "The specific needs of girls and boys shall be fully considered in all stages of DDR processes. A gender-transformative approach should be pursued, aiming to shift social norms and address structural inequalities that lead girls and boys to engage in armed conflict and that negatively affect their reintegration. Within DDR processes, a gender-transformative approach shall focus on the following: \\n Agency: Interventions should strengthen the individual and collective capacities (knowledge and skills), attitudes, critical reflection, assets, actions and access to services that support the reintegration of girls. \\n Relations: Interventions should equip girls with the skills to navigate the expectations and cooperative or negotiation dynamics embedded within relationships between people in the home, market, community, and groups and organizations that will influence choice. \\n Structures: Interventions should address the informal and formal institutional rules and practices, social norms and statuses that limit options available to girls and work to create space for their empowerment.", + "Paragraph": "The specific needs of girls and boys shall be fully considered in all stages of DDR processes. A gender-transformative approach should be pursued, aiming to shift social norms and address structural inequalities that lead girls and boys to engage in armed conflict and that negatively affect their reintegration. Within DDR processes, a gender-transformative approach shall focus on the following: \n Agency: Interventions should strengthen the individual and collective capacities (knowledge and skills), attitudes, critical reflection, assets, actions and access to services that support the reintegration of girls. \n Relations: Interventions should equip girls with the skills to navigate the expectations and cooperative or negotiation dynamics embedded within relationships between people in the home, market, community, and groups and organizations that will influence choice. \n Structures: Interventions should address the informal and formal institutional rules and practices, social norms and statuses that limit options available to girls and work to create space for their empowerment.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -137046,14 +137046,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.3 Data", "Heading3": "6.3.3 Gender responsive and transformative", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Relations: Interventions should equip girls with the skills to navigate the expectations and cooperative or negotiation dynamics embedded within relationships between people in the home, market, community, and groups and organizations that will influence choice.", + "Sentence": "\n Relations: Interventions should equip girls with the skills to navigate the expectations and cooperative or negotiation dynamics embedded within relationships between people in the home, market, community, and groups and organizations that will influence choice.", "newParagraph": "specific need girl boy shall fully considered stage ddr process gendertransformative approach pursued aiming shift social norm address structural inequality lead girl boy engage armed conflict negatively affect reintegration within ddr process gendertransformative approach shall focus following n agency intervention strengthen individual collective capacity knowledge skill attitude critical reflection asset action access service support reintegration girl n relation intervention equip girl skill navigate expectation cooperative negotiation dynamic embedded within relationship people home market community group organization influence choice n structure intervention address informal formal institutional rule practice social norm status limit option available girl work create space empowerment", "ProcessedSent": "n relation intervention equip girl skill navigate expectation cooperative negotiation dynamic embedded within relationship people home market community group organization influence choice", "SentID": 7613 }, { "ParagraphID": 2271, - "Paragraph": "The specific needs of girls and boys shall be fully considered in all stages of DDR processes. A gender-transformative approach should be pursued, aiming to shift social norms and address structural inequalities that lead girls and boys to engage in armed conflict and that negatively affect their reintegration. Within DDR processes, a gender-transformative approach shall focus on the following: \\n Agency: Interventions should strengthen the individual and collective capacities (knowledge and skills), attitudes, critical reflection, assets, actions and access to services that support the reintegration of girls. \\n Relations: Interventions should equip girls with the skills to navigate the expectations and cooperative or negotiation dynamics embedded within relationships between people in the home, market, community, and groups and organizations that will influence choice. \\n Structures: Interventions should address the informal and formal institutional rules and practices, social norms and statuses that limit options available to girls and work to create space for their empowerment.", + "Paragraph": "The specific needs of girls and boys shall be fully considered in all stages of DDR processes. A gender-transformative approach should be pursued, aiming to shift social norms and address structural inequalities that lead girls and boys to engage in armed conflict and that negatively affect their reintegration. Within DDR processes, a gender-transformative approach shall focus on the following: \n Agency: Interventions should strengthen the individual and collective capacities (knowledge and skills), attitudes, critical reflection, assets, actions and access to services that support the reintegration of girls. \n Relations: Interventions should equip girls with the skills to navigate the expectations and cooperative or negotiation dynamics embedded within relationships between people in the home, market, community, and groups and organizations that will influence choice. \n Structures: Interventions should address the informal and formal institutional rules and practices, social norms and statuses that limit options available to girls and work to create space for their empowerment.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -137064,7 +137064,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.3 Data", "Heading3": "6.3.3 Gender responsive and transformative", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Structures: Interventions should address the informal and formal institutional rules and practices, social norms and statuses that limit options available to girls and work to create space for their empowerment.", + "Sentence": "\n Structures: Interventions should address the informal and formal institutional rules and practices, social norms and statuses that limit options available to girls and work to create space for their empowerment.", "newParagraph": "specific need girl boy shall fully considered stage ddr process gendertransformative approach pursued aiming shift social norm address structural inequality lead girl boy engage armed conflict negatively affect reintegration within ddr process gendertransformative approach shall focus following n agency intervention strengthen individual collective capacity knowledge skill attitude critical reflection asset action access service support reintegration girl n relation intervention equip girl skill navigate expectation cooperative negotiation dynamic embedded within relationship people home market community group organization influence choice n structure intervention address informal formal institutional rule practice social norm status limit option available girl work create space empowerment", "ProcessedSent": "n structure intervention address informal formal institutional rule practice social norm status limit option available girl work create space empowerment", "SentID": 7614 @@ -137197,7 +137197,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2273, - "Paragraph": "As a key element, a gender-transformative approach should also engage boys, young men, and the wider community so that girls may be viewed and treated more equally by the whole community. It should also recognize that boys and men may also become associated with armed forces and groups due to expectations about the gender roles they should perform, including roles as protector and bread winner even at young ages, particularly where a father has died or is missing, and about social norms that promote violence and\/or taking up arms as acceptable or preferred measures to resolve problems. This community-based approach is necessary to help promote the empowerment of girls by educating traditional patriarchal communities on gender equality and thus work towards countering harmful gender norms that enable violence to flourish. Other gender transformative approaches critical for boys include: \\n Non-violent forms of masculinities: Often through socialization into violence or through witnessing the use of violence while with armed forces and groups, boys may develop an association of violence through social norms surrounding masculinity and social recognition. Such associations may in turn lead to the development of anti-social behaviour towards themselves, to girls or vulnerable groups, or to community. Supporting boys in deconstructing violent or militarized norms about masculinity is an essential part of breaking the cycle of violence and supporting successful reintegration. This may also involve supporting emotional skill development, including understanding and working with anger in a healthy way. \\n Gender-Equitable Relations and Structures: The ideology, structure and treatment of women or girls in armed forces and groups may have led to the development of non-equitable views regarding gender norms, which may affect notions of what \u2018consent\u2019 is. Supporting equitable norms, views, and approaches to being in relationship with girls, and cultivating respect for agency and choice of girls and women, is critical to supporting boys formulate healthy norms and relationships in adulthood.", + "Paragraph": "As a key element, a gender-transformative approach should also engage boys, young men, and the wider community so that girls may be viewed and treated more equally by the whole community. It should also recognize that boys and men may also become associated with armed forces and groups due to expectations about the gender roles they should perform, including roles as protector and bread winner even at young ages, particularly where a father has died or is missing, and about social norms that promote violence and\/or taking up arms as acceptable or preferred measures to resolve problems. This community-based approach is necessary to help promote the empowerment of girls by educating traditional patriarchal communities on gender equality and thus work towards countering harmful gender norms that enable violence to flourish. Other gender transformative approaches critical for boys include: \n Non-violent forms of masculinities: Often through socialization into violence or through witnessing the use of violence while with armed forces and groups, boys may develop an association of violence through social norms surrounding masculinity and social recognition. Such associations may in turn lead to the development of anti-social behaviour towards themselves, to girls or vulnerable groups, or to community. Supporting boys in deconstructing violent or militarized norms about masculinity is an essential part of breaking the cycle of violence and supporting successful reintegration. This may also involve supporting emotional skill development, including understanding and working with anger in a healthy way. \n Gender-Equitable Relations and Structures: The ideology, structure and treatment of women or girls in armed forces and groups may have led to the development of non-equitable views regarding gender norms, which may affect notions of what \u2018consent\u2019 is. Supporting equitable norms, views, and approaches to being in relationship with girls, and cultivating respect for agency and choice of girls and women, is critical to supporting boys formulate healthy norms and relationships in adulthood.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -137215,7 +137215,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2273, - "Paragraph": "As a key element, a gender-transformative approach should also engage boys, young men, and the wider community so that girls may be viewed and treated more equally by the whole community. It should also recognize that boys and men may also become associated with armed forces and groups due to expectations about the gender roles they should perform, including roles as protector and bread winner even at young ages, particularly where a father has died or is missing, and about social norms that promote violence and\/or taking up arms as acceptable or preferred measures to resolve problems. This community-based approach is necessary to help promote the empowerment of girls by educating traditional patriarchal communities on gender equality and thus work towards countering harmful gender norms that enable violence to flourish. Other gender transformative approaches critical for boys include: \\n Non-violent forms of masculinities: Often through socialization into violence or through witnessing the use of violence while with armed forces and groups, boys may develop an association of violence through social norms surrounding masculinity and social recognition. Such associations may in turn lead to the development of anti-social behaviour towards themselves, to girls or vulnerable groups, or to community. Supporting boys in deconstructing violent or militarized norms about masculinity is an essential part of breaking the cycle of violence and supporting successful reintegration. This may also involve supporting emotional skill development, including understanding and working with anger in a healthy way. \\n Gender-Equitable Relations and Structures: The ideology, structure and treatment of women or girls in armed forces and groups may have led to the development of non-equitable views regarding gender norms, which may affect notions of what \u2018consent\u2019 is. Supporting equitable norms, views, and approaches to being in relationship with girls, and cultivating respect for agency and choice of girls and women, is critical to supporting boys formulate healthy norms and relationships in adulthood.", + "Paragraph": "As a key element, a gender-transformative approach should also engage boys, young men, and the wider community so that girls may be viewed and treated more equally by the whole community. It should also recognize that boys and men may also become associated with armed forces and groups due to expectations about the gender roles they should perform, including roles as protector and bread winner even at young ages, particularly where a father has died or is missing, and about social norms that promote violence and\/or taking up arms as acceptable or preferred measures to resolve problems. This community-based approach is necessary to help promote the empowerment of girls by educating traditional patriarchal communities on gender equality and thus work towards countering harmful gender norms that enable violence to flourish. Other gender transformative approaches critical for boys include: \n Non-violent forms of masculinities: Often through socialization into violence or through witnessing the use of violence while with armed forces and groups, boys may develop an association of violence through social norms surrounding masculinity and social recognition. Such associations may in turn lead to the development of anti-social behaviour towards themselves, to girls or vulnerable groups, or to community. Supporting boys in deconstructing violent or militarized norms about masculinity is an essential part of breaking the cycle of violence and supporting successful reintegration. This may also involve supporting emotional skill development, including understanding and working with anger in a healthy way. \n Gender-Equitable Relations and Structures: The ideology, structure and treatment of women or girls in armed forces and groups may have led to the development of non-equitable views regarding gender norms, which may affect notions of what \u2018consent\u2019 is. Supporting equitable norms, views, and approaches to being in relationship with girls, and cultivating respect for agency and choice of girls and women, is critical to supporting boys formulate healthy norms and relationships in adulthood.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -137233,7 +137233,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2273, - "Paragraph": "As a key element, a gender-transformative approach should also engage boys, young men, and the wider community so that girls may be viewed and treated more equally by the whole community. It should also recognize that boys and men may also become associated with armed forces and groups due to expectations about the gender roles they should perform, including roles as protector and bread winner even at young ages, particularly where a father has died or is missing, and about social norms that promote violence and\/or taking up arms as acceptable or preferred measures to resolve problems. This community-based approach is necessary to help promote the empowerment of girls by educating traditional patriarchal communities on gender equality and thus work towards countering harmful gender norms that enable violence to flourish. Other gender transformative approaches critical for boys include: \\n Non-violent forms of masculinities: Often through socialization into violence or through witnessing the use of violence while with armed forces and groups, boys may develop an association of violence through social norms surrounding masculinity and social recognition. Such associations may in turn lead to the development of anti-social behaviour towards themselves, to girls or vulnerable groups, or to community. Supporting boys in deconstructing violent or militarized norms about masculinity is an essential part of breaking the cycle of violence and supporting successful reintegration. This may also involve supporting emotional skill development, including understanding and working with anger in a healthy way. \\n Gender-Equitable Relations and Structures: The ideology, structure and treatment of women or girls in armed forces and groups may have led to the development of non-equitable views regarding gender norms, which may affect notions of what \u2018consent\u2019 is. Supporting equitable norms, views, and approaches to being in relationship with girls, and cultivating respect for agency and choice of girls and women, is critical to supporting boys formulate healthy norms and relationships in adulthood.", + "Paragraph": "As a key element, a gender-transformative approach should also engage boys, young men, and the wider community so that girls may be viewed and treated more equally by the whole community. It should also recognize that boys and men may also become associated with armed forces and groups due to expectations about the gender roles they should perform, including roles as protector and bread winner even at young ages, particularly where a father has died or is missing, and about social norms that promote violence and\/or taking up arms as acceptable or preferred measures to resolve problems. This community-based approach is necessary to help promote the empowerment of girls by educating traditional patriarchal communities on gender equality and thus work towards countering harmful gender norms that enable violence to flourish. Other gender transformative approaches critical for boys include: \n Non-violent forms of masculinities: Often through socialization into violence or through witnessing the use of violence while with armed forces and groups, boys may develop an association of violence through social norms surrounding masculinity and social recognition. Such associations may in turn lead to the development of anti-social behaviour towards themselves, to girls or vulnerable groups, or to community. Supporting boys in deconstructing violent or militarized norms about masculinity is an essential part of breaking the cycle of violence and supporting successful reintegration. This may also involve supporting emotional skill development, including understanding and working with anger in a healthy way. \n Gender-Equitable Relations and Structures: The ideology, structure and treatment of women or girls in armed forces and groups may have led to the development of non-equitable views regarding gender norms, which may affect notions of what \u2018consent\u2019 is. Supporting equitable norms, views, and approaches to being in relationship with girls, and cultivating respect for agency and choice of girls and women, is critical to supporting boys formulate healthy norms and relationships in adulthood.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -137251,7 +137251,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2273, - "Paragraph": "As a key element, a gender-transformative approach should also engage boys, young men, and the wider community so that girls may be viewed and treated more equally by the whole community. It should also recognize that boys and men may also become associated with armed forces and groups due to expectations about the gender roles they should perform, including roles as protector and bread winner even at young ages, particularly where a father has died or is missing, and about social norms that promote violence and\/or taking up arms as acceptable or preferred measures to resolve problems. This community-based approach is necessary to help promote the empowerment of girls by educating traditional patriarchal communities on gender equality and thus work towards countering harmful gender norms that enable violence to flourish. Other gender transformative approaches critical for boys include: \\n Non-violent forms of masculinities: Often through socialization into violence or through witnessing the use of violence while with armed forces and groups, boys may develop an association of violence through social norms surrounding masculinity and social recognition. Such associations may in turn lead to the development of anti-social behaviour towards themselves, to girls or vulnerable groups, or to community. Supporting boys in deconstructing violent or militarized norms about masculinity is an essential part of breaking the cycle of violence and supporting successful reintegration. This may also involve supporting emotional skill development, including understanding and working with anger in a healthy way. \\n Gender-Equitable Relations and Structures: The ideology, structure and treatment of women or girls in armed forces and groups may have led to the development of non-equitable views regarding gender norms, which may affect notions of what \u2018consent\u2019 is. Supporting equitable norms, views, and approaches to being in relationship with girls, and cultivating respect for agency and choice of girls and women, is critical to supporting boys formulate healthy norms and relationships in adulthood.", + "Paragraph": "As a key element, a gender-transformative approach should also engage boys, young men, and the wider community so that girls may be viewed and treated more equally by the whole community. It should also recognize that boys and men may also become associated with armed forces and groups due to expectations about the gender roles they should perform, including roles as protector and bread winner even at young ages, particularly where a father has died or is missing, and about social norms that promote violence and\/or taking up arms as acceptable or preferred measures to resolve problems. This community-based approach is necessary to help promote the empowerment of girls by educating traditional patriarchal communities on gender equality and thus work towards countering harmful gender norms that enable violence to flourish. Other gender transformative approaches critical for boys include: \n Non-violent forms of masculinities: Often through socialization into violence or through witnessing the use of violence while with armed forces and groups, boys may develop an association of violence through social norms surrounding masculinity and social recognition. Such associations may in turn lead to the development of anti-social behaviour towards themselves, to girls or vulnerable groups, or to community. Supporting boys in deconstructing violent or militarized norms about masculinity is an essential part of breaking the cycle of violence and supporting successful reintegration. This may also involve supporting emotional skill development, including understanding and working with anger in a healthy way. \n Gender-Equitable Relations and Structures: The ideology, structure and treatment of women or girls in armed forces and groups may have led to the development of non-equitable views regarding gender norms, which may affect notions of what \u2018consent\u2019 is. Supporting equitable norms, views, and approaches to being in relationship with girls, and cultivating respect for agency and choice of girls and women, is critical to supporting boys formulate healthy norms and relationships in adulthood.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -137262,14 +137262,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.3 Data", "Heading3": "6.3.3 Gender responsive and transformative", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Other gender transformative approaches critical for boys include: \\n Non-violent forms of masculinities: Often through socialization into violence or through witnessing the use of violence while with armed forces and groups, boys may develop an association of violence through social norms surrounding masculinity and social recognition.", + "Sentence": "Other gender transformative approaches critical for boys include: \n Non-violent forms of masculinities: Often through socialization into violence or through witnessing the use of violence while with armed forces and groups, boys may develop an association of violence through social norms surrounding masculinity and social recognition.", "newParagraph": "key element gendertransformative approach also engage boy young men wider community girl may viewed treated equally whole community also recognize boy men may also become associated armed force group due expectation gender role perform including role protector bread winner even young age particularly father died missing social norm promote violence andor taking arm acceptable preferred measure resolve problem communitybased approach necessary help promote empowerment girl educating traditional patriarchal community gender equality thus work towards countering harmful gender norm enable violence flourish gender transformative approach critical boy include n nonviolent form masculinity often socialization violence witnessing use violence armed force group boy may develop association violence social norm surrounding masculinity social recognition association may turn lead development antisocial behaviour towards girl vulnerable group community supporting boy deconstructing violent militarized norm masculinity essential part breaking cycle violence supporting successful reintegration may also involve supporting emotional skill development including understanding working anger healthy way n genderequitable relation structure ideology structure treatment woman girl armed force group may led development nonequitable view regarding gender norm may affect notion consent supporting equitable norm view approach relationship girl cultivating respect agency choice girl woman critical supporting boy formulate healthy norm relationship adulthood", "ProcessedSent": "gender transformative approach critical boy include n nonviolent form masculinity often socialization violence witnessing use violence armed force group boy may develop association violence social norm surrounding masculinity social recognition", "SentID": 7625 }, { "ParagraphID": 2273, - "Paragraph": "As a key element, a gender-transformative approach should also engage boys, young men, and the wider community so that girls may be viewed and treated more equally by the whole community. It should also recognize that boys and men may also become associated with armed forces and groups due to expectations about the gender roles they should perform, including roles as protector and bread winner even at young ages, particularly where a father has died or is missing, and about social norms that promote violence and\/or taking up arms as acceptable or preferred measures to resolve problems. This community-based approach is necessary to help promote the empowerment of girls by educating traditional patriarchal communities on gender equality and thus work towards countering harmful gender norms that enable violence to flourish. Other gender transformative approaches critical for boys include: \\n Non-violent forms of masculinities: Often through socialization into violence or through witnessing the use of violence while with armed forces and groups, boys may develop an association of violence through social norms surrounding masculinity and social recognition. Such associations may in turn lead to the development of anti-social behaviour towards themselves, to girls or vulnerable groups, or to community. Supporting boys in deconstructing violent or militarized norms about masculinity is an essential part of breaking the cycle of violence and supporting successful reintegration. This may also involve supporting emotional skill development, including understanding and working with anger in a healthy way. \\n Gender-Equitable Relations and Structures: The ideology, structure and treatment of women or girls in armed forces and groups may have led to the development of non-equitable views regarding gender norms, which may affect notions of what \u2018consent\u2019 is. Supporting equitable norms, views, and approaches to being in relationship with girls, and cultivating respect for agency and choice of girls and women, is critical to supporting boys formulate healthy norms and relationships in adulthood.", + "Paragraph": "As a key element, a gender-transformative approach should also engage boys, young men, and the wider community so that girls may be viewed and treated more equally by the whole community. It should also recognize that boys and men may also become associated with armed forces and groups due to expectations about the gender roles they should perform, including roles as protector and bread winner even at young ages, particularly where a father has died or is missing, and about social norms that promote violence and\/or taking up arms as acceptable or preferred measures to resolve problems. This community-based approach is necessary to help promote the empowerment of girls by educating traditional patriarchal communities on gender equality and thus work towards countering harmful gender norms that enable violence to flourish. Other gender transformative approaches critical for boys include: \n Non-violent forms of masculinities: Often through socialization into violence or through witnessing the use of violence while with armed forces and groups, boys may develop an association of violence through social norms surrounding masculinity and social recognition. Such associations may in turn lead to the development of anti-social behaviour towards themselves, to girls or vulnerable groups, or to community. Supporting boys in deconstructing violent or militarized norms about masculinity is an essential part of breaking the cycle of violence and supporting successful reintegration. This may also involve supporting emotional skill development, including understanding and working with anger in a healthy way. \n Gender-Equitable Relations and Structures: The ideology, structure and treatment of women or girls in armed forces and groups may have led to the development of non-equitable views regarding gender norms, which may affect notions of what \u2018consent\u2019 is. Supporting equitable norms, views, and approaches to being in relationship with girls, and cultivating respect for agency and choice of girls and women, is critical to supporting boys formulate healthy norms and relationships in adulthood.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -137287,7 +137287,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2273, - "Paragraph": "As a key element, a gender-transformative approach should also engage boys, young men, and the wider community so that girls may be viewed and treated more equally by the whole community. It should also recognize that boys and men may also become associated with armed forces and groups due to expectations about the gender roles they should perform, including roles as protector and bread winner even at young ages, particularly where a father has died or is missing, and about social norms that promote violence and\/or taking up arms as acceptable or preferred measures to resolve problems. This community-based approach is necessary to help promote the empowerment of girls by educating traditional patriarchal communities on gender equality and thus work towards countering harmful gender norms that enable violence to flourish. Other gender transformative approaches critical for boys include: \\n Non-violent forms of masculinities: Often through socialization into violence or through witnessing the use of violence while with armed forces and groups, boys may develop an association of violence through social norms surrounding masculinity and social recognition. Such associations may in turn lead to the development of anti-social behaviour towards themselves, to girls or vulnerable groups, or to community. Supporting boys in deconstructing violent or militarized norms about masculinity is an essential part of breaking the cycle of violence and supporting successful reintegration. This may also involve supporting emotional skill development, including understanding and working with anger in a healthy way. \\n Gender-Equitable Relations and Structures: The ideology, structure and treatment of women or girls in armed forces and groups may have led to the development of non-equitable views regarding gender norms, which may affect notions of what \u2018consent\u2019 is. Supporting equitable norms, views, and approaches to being in relationship with girls, and cultivating respect for agency and choice of girls and women, is critical to supporting boys formulate healthy norms and relationships in adulthood.", + "Paragraph": "As a key element, a gender-transformative approach should also engage boys, young men, and the wider community so that girls may be viewed and treated more equally by the whole community. It should also recognize that boys and men may also become associated with armed forces and groups due to expectations about the gender roles they should perform, including roles as protector and bread winner even at young ages, particularly where a father has died or is missing, and about social norms that promote violence and\/or taking up arms as acceptable or preferred measures to resolve problems. This community-based approach is necessary to help promote the empowerment of girls by educating traditional patriarchal communities on gender equality and thus work towards countering harmful gender norms that enable violence to flourish. Other gender transformative approaches critical for boys include: \n Non-violent forms of masculinities: Often through socialization into violence or through witnessing the use of violence while with armed forces and groups, boys may develop an association of violence through social norms surrounding masculinity and social recognition. Such associations may in turn lead to the development of anti-social behaviour towards themselves, to girls or vulnerable groups, or to community. Supporting boys in deconstructing violent or militarized norms about masculinity is an essential part of breaking the cycle of violence and supporting successful reintegration. This may also involve supporting emotional skill development, including understanding and working with anger in a healthy way. \n Gender-Equitable Relations and Structures: The ideology, structure and treatment of women or girls in armed forces and groups may have led to the development of non-equitable views regarding gender norms, which may affect notions of what \u2018consent\u2019 is. Supporting equitable norms, views, and approaches to being in relationship with girls, and cultivating respect for agency and choice of girls and women, is critical to supporting boys formulate healthy norms and relationships in adulthood.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -137305,7 +137305,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2273, - "Paragraph": "As a key element, a gender-transformative approach should also engage boys, young men, and the wider community so that girls may be viewed and treated more equally by the whole community. It should also recognize that boys and men may also become associated with armed forces and groups due to expectations about the gender roles they should perform, including roles as protector and bread winner even at young ages, particularly where a father has died or is missing, and about social norms that promote violence and\/or taking up arms as acceptable or preferred measures to resolve problems. This community-based approach is necessary to help promote the empowerment of girls by educating traditional patriarchal communities on gender equality and thus work towards countering harmful gender norms that enable violence to flourish. Other gender transformative approaches critical for boys include: \\n Non-violent forms of masculinities: Often through socialization into violence or through witnessing the use of violence while with armed forces and groups, boys may develop an association of violence through social norms surrounding masculinity and social recognition. Such associations may in turn lead to the development of anti-social behaviour towards themselves, to girls or vulnerable groups, or to community. Supporting boys in deconstructing violent or militarized norms about masculinity is an essential part of breaking the cycle of violence and supporting successful reintegration. This may also involve supporting emotional skill development, including understanding and working with anger in a healthy way. \\n Gender-Equitable Relations and Structures: The ideology, structure and treatment of women or girls in armed forces and groups may have led to the development of non-equitable views regarding gender norms, which may affect notions of what \u2018consent\u2019 is. Supporting equitable norms, views, and approaches to being in relationship with girls, and cultivating respect for agency and choice of girls and women, is critical to supporting boys formulate healthy norms and relationships in adulthood.", + "Paragraph": "As a key element, a gender-transformative approach should also engage boys, young men, and the wider community so that girls may be viewed and treated more equally by the whole community. It should also recognize that boys and men may also become associated with armed forces and groups due to expectations about the gender roles they should perform, including roles as protector and bread winner even at young ages, particularly where a father has died or is missing, and about social norms that promote violence and\/or taking up arms as acceptable or preferred measures to resolve problems. This community-based approach is necessary to help promote the empowerment of girls by educating traditional patriarchal communities on gender equality and thus work towards countering harmful gender norms that enable violence to flourish. Other gender transformative approaches critical for boys include: \n Non-violent forms of masculinities: Often through socialization into violence or through witnessing the use of violence while with armed forces and groups, boys may develop an association of violence through social norms surrounding masculinity and social recognition. Such associations may in turn lead to the development of anti-social behaviour towards themselves, to girls or vulnerable groups, or to community. Supporting boys in deconstructing violent or militarized norms about masculinity is an essential part of breaking the cycle of violence and supporting successful reintegration. This may also involve supporting emotional skill development, including understanding and working with anger in a healthy way. \n Gender-Equitable Relations and Structures: The ideology, structure and treatment of women or girls in armed forces and groups may have led to the development of non-equitable views regarding gender norms, which may affect notions of what \u2018consent\u2019 is. Supporting equitable norms, views, and approaches to being in relationship with girls, and cultivating respect for agency and choice of girls and women, is critical to supporting boys formulate healthy norms and relationships in adulthood.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -137323,7 +137323,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2273, - "Paragraph": "As a key element, a gender-transformative approach should also engage boys, young men, and the wider community so that girls may be viewed and treated more equally by the whole community. It should also recognize that boys and men may also become associated with armed forces and groups due to expectations about the gender roles they should perform, including roles as protector and bread winner even at young ages, particularly where a father has died or is missing, and about social norms that promote violence and\/or taking up arms as acceptable or preferred measures to resolve problems. This community-based approach is necessary to help promote the empowerment of girls by educating traditional patriarchal communities on gender equality and thus work towards countering harmful gender norms that enable violence to flourish. Other gender transformative approaches critical for boys include: \\n Non-violent forms of masculinities: Often through socialization into violence or through witnessing the use of violence while with armed forces and groups, boys may develop an association of violence through social norms surrounding masculinity and social recognition. Such associations may in turn lead to the development of anti-social behaviour towards themselves, to girls or vulnerable groups, or to community. Supporting boys in deconstructing violent or militarized norms about masculinity is an essential part of breaking the cycle of violence and supporting successful reintegration. This may also involve supporting emotional skill development, including understanding and working with anger in a healthy way. \\n Gender-Equitable Relations and Structures: The ideology, structure and treatment of women or girls in armed forces and groups may have led to the development of non-equitable views regarding gender norms, which may affect notions of what \u2018consent\u2019 is. Supporting equitable norms, views, and approaches to being in relationship with girls, and cultivating respect for agency and choice of girls and women, is critical to supporting boys formulate healthy norms and relationships in adulthood.", + "Paragraph": "As a key element, a gender-transformative approach should also engage boys, young men, and the wider community so that girls may be viewed and treated more equally by the whole community. It should also recognize that boys and men may also become associated with armed forces and groups due to expectations about the gender roles they should perform, including roles as protector and bread winner even at young ages, particularly where a father has died or is missing, and about social norms that promote violence and\/or taking up arms as acceptable or preferred measures to resolve problems. This community-based approach is necessary to help promote the empowerment of girls by educating traditional patriarchal communities on gender equality and thus work towards countering harmful gender norms that enable violence to flourish. Other gender transformative approaches critical for boys include: \n Non-violent forms of masculinities: Often through socialization into violence or through witnessing the use of violence while with armed forces and groups, boys may develop an association of violence through social norms surrounding masculinity and social recognition. Such associations may in turn lead to the development of anti-social behaviour towards themselves, to girls or vulnerable groups, or to community. Supporting boys in deconstructing violent or militarized norms about masculinity is an essential part of breaking the cycle of violence and supporting successful reintegration. This may also involve supporting emotional skill development, including understanding and working with anger in a healthy way. \n Gender-Equitable Relations and Structures: The ideology, structure and treatment of women or girls in armed forces and groups may have led to the development of non-equitable views regarding gender norms, which may affect notions of what \u2018consent\u2019 is. Supporting equitable norms, views, and approaches to being in relationship with girls, and cultivating respect for agency and choice of girls and women, is critical to supporting boys formulate healthy norms and relationships in adulthood.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -137334,14 +137334,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.3 Data", "Heading3": "6.3.3 Gender responsive and transformative", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Gender-Equitable Relations and Structures: The ideology, structure and treatment of women or girls in armed forces and groups may have led to the development of non-equitable views regarding gender norms, which may affect notions of what \u2018consent\u2019 is.", + "Sentence": "\n Gender-Equitable Relations and Structures: The ideology, structure and treatment of women or girls in armed forces and groups may have led to the development of non-equitable views regarding gender norms, which may affect notions of what \u2018consent\u2019 is.", "newParagraph": "key element gendertransformative approach also engage boy young men wider community girl may viewed treated equally whole community also recognize boy men may also become associated armed force group due expectation gender role perform including role protector bread winner even young age particularly father died missing social norm promote violence andor taking arm acceptable preferred measure resolve problem communitybased approach necessary help promote empowerment girl educating traditional patriarchal community gender equality thus work towards countering harmful gender norm enable violence flourish gender transformative approach critical boy include n nonviolent form masculinity often socialization violence witnessing use violence armed force group boy may develop association violence social norm surrounding masculinity social recognition association may turn lead development antisocial behaviour towards girl vulnerable group community supporting boy deconstructing violent militarized norm masculinity essential part breaking cycle violence supporting successful reintegration may also involve supporting emotional skill development including understanding working anger healthy way n genderequitable relation structure ideology structure treatment woman girl armed force group may led development nonequitable view regarding gender norm may affect notion consent supporting equitable norm view approach relationship girl cultivating respect agency choice girl woman critical supporting boy formulate healthy norm relationship adulthood", "ProcessedSent": "n genderequitable relation structure ideology structure treatment woman girl armed force group may led development nonequitable view regarding gender norm may affect notion consent ", "SentID": 7629 }, { "ParagraphID": 2273, - "Paragraph": "As a key element, a gender-transformative approach should also engage boys, young men, and the wider community so that girls may be viewed and treated more equally by the whole community. It should also recognize that boys and men may also become associated with armed forces and groups due to expectations about the gender roles they should perform, including roles as protector and bread winner even at young ages, particularly where a father has died or is missing, and about social norms that promote violence and\/or taking up arms as acceptable or preferred measures to resolve problems. This community-based approach is necessary to help promote the empowerment of girls by educating traditional patriarchal communities on gender equality and thus work towards countering harmful gender norms that enable violence to flourish. Other gender transformative approaches critical for boys include: \\n Non-violent forms of masculinities: Often through socialization into violence or through witnessing the use of violence while with armed forces and groups, boys may develop an association of violence through social norms surrounding masculinity and social recognition. Such associations may in turn lead to the development of anti-social behaviour towards themselves, to girls or vulnerable groups, or to community. Supporting boys in deconstructing violent or militarized norms about masculinity is an essential part of breaking the cycle of violence and supporting successful reintegration. This may also involve supporting emotional skill development, including understanding and working with anger in a healthy way. \\n Gender-Equitable Relations and Structures: The ideology, structure and treatment of women or girls in armed forces and groups may have led to the development of non-equitable views regarding gender norms, which may affect notions of what \u2018consent\u2019 is. Supporting equitable norms, views, and approaches to being in relationship with girls, and cultivating respect for agency and choice of girls and women, is critical to supporting boys formulate healthy norms and relationships in adulthood.", + "Paragraph": "As a key element, a gender-transformative approach should also engage boys, young men, and the wider community so that girls may be viewed and treated more equally by the whole community. It should also recognize that boys and men may also become associated with armed forces and groups due to expectations about the gender roles they should perform, including roles as protector and bread winner even at young ages, particularly where a father has died or is missing, and about social norms that promote violence and\/or taking up arms as acceptable or preferred measures to resolve problems. This community-based approach is necessary to help promote the empowerment of girls by educating traditional patriarchal communities on gender equality and thus work towards countering harmful gender norms that enable violence to flourish. Other gender transformative approaches critical for boys include: \n Non-violent forms of masculinities: Often through socialization into violence or through witnessing the use of violence while with armed forces and groups, boys may develop an association of violence through social norms surrounding masculinity and social recognition. Such associations may in turn lead to the development of anti-social behaviour towards themselves, to girls or vulnerable groups, or to community. Supporting boys in deconstructing violent or militarized norms about masculinity is an essential part of breaking the cycle of violence and supporting successful reintegration. This may also involve supporting emotional skill development, including understanding and working with anger in a healthy way. \n Gender-Equitable Relations and Structures: The ideology, structure and treatment of women or girls in armed forces and groups may have led to the development of non-equitable views regarding gender norms, which may affect notions of what \u2018consent\u2019 is. Supporting equitable norms, views, and approaches to being in relationship with girls, and cultivating respect for agency and choice of girls and women, is critical to supporting boys formulate healthy norms and relationships in adulthood.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -139807,7 +139807,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2312, - "Paragraph": "Reproductive health \\n As soon as possible after their release from an armed force or group, and for as long as necessary, girls and boys who have survived sexual violence, abuse and exploitation shall receive medical care in addition to mental health and psychosocial care (see section 7.9.1). Consideration shall also be given to boys who may have been forced to perpetrate sexual violence. All children who have experienced sexual violence shall receive access to the Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) for sexual and reproductive health.7 Girl mothers shall be referred to community health services and psychosocial support as a priority. To prevent cycles of violence, girl mothers shall be enabled to learn positive parenting skills so that their children develop in a nurturing household. \\n DDR practitioners should invest in reproductive health awareness-raising initiatives for boys and girls (especially adolescents) covering issues such as safe motherhood, sexual violence, sexually transmitted infections, family planning and the reproductive health of young people. Increasing the awareness of boys will help to reduce the reproductive health burden on girls and enable a gender-transformative approach (see section 4.3). Consideration shall be given to any sensitivities that may arise through the inclusion of boys in these awareness-raising initiatives, and necessary preparations shall be made with families and community leaders to gain their support.", + "Paragraph": "Reproductive health \n As soon as possible after their release from an armed force or group, and for as long as necessary, girls and boys who have survived sexual violence, abuse and exploitation shall receive medical care in addition to mental health and psychosocial care (see section 7.9.1). Consideration shall also be given to boys who may have been forced to perpetrate sexual violence. All children who have experienced sexual violence shall receive access to the Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) for sexual and reproductive health.7 Girl mothers shall be referred to community health services and psychosocial support as a priority. To prevent cycles of violence, girl mothers shall be enabled to learn positive parenting skills so that their children develop in a nurturing household. \n DDR practitioners should invest in reproductive health awareness-raising initiatives for boys and girls (especially adolescents) covering issues such as safe motherhood, sexual violence, sexually transmitted infections, family planning and the reproductive health of young people. Increasing the awareness of boys will help to reduce the reproductive health burden on girls and enable a gender-transformative approach (see section 4.3). Consideration shall be given to any sensitivities that may arise through the inclusion of boys in these awareness-raising initiatives, and necessary preparations shall be made with families and community leaders to gain their support.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -139818,14 +139818,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.1 Health", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Reproductive health \\n As soon as possible after their release from an armed force or group, and for as long as necessary, girls and boys who have survived sexual violence, abuse and exploitation shall receive medical care in addition to mental health and psychosocial care (see section 7.9.1).", + "Sentence": "Reproductive health \n As soon as possible after their release from an armed force or group, and for as long as necessary, girls and boys who have survived sexual violence, abuse and exploitation shall receive medical care in addition to mental health and psychosocial care (see section 7.9.1).", "newParagraph": "reproductive health n soon possible release armed force group long necessary girl boy survived sexual violence abuse exploitation shall receive medical care addition mental health psychosocial care see section 791 consideration shall also given boy may forced perpetrate sexual violence child experienced sexual violence shall receive access minimum initial service package misp sexual reproductive health7 girl mother shall referred community health service psychosocial support priority prevent cycle violence girl mother shall enabled learn positive parenting skill child develop nurturing household n ddr practitioner invest reproductive health awarenessraising initiative boy girl especially adolescent covering issue safe motherhood sexual violence sexually transmitted infection family planning reproductive health young people increasing awareness boy help reduce reproductive health burden girl enable gendertransformative approach see section 43 consideration shall given sensitivity may arise inclusion boy awarenessraising initiative necessary preparation shall made family community leader gain support", "ProcessedSent": "reproductive health n soon possible release armed force group long necessary girl boy survived sexual violence abuse exploitation shall receive medical care addition mental health psychosocial care see section 791", "SentID": 7767 }, { "ParagraphID": 2312, - "Paragraph": "Reproductive health \\n As soon as possible after their release from an armed force or group, and for as long as necessary, girls and boys who have survived sexual violence, abuse and exploitation shall receive medical care in addition to mental health and psychosocial care (see section 7.9.1). Consideration shall also be given to boys who may have been forced to perpetrate sexual violence. All children who have experienced sexual violence shall receive access to the Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) for sexual and reproductive health.7 Girl mothers shall be referred to community health services and psychosocial support as a priority. To prevent cycles of violence, girl mothers shall be enabled to learn positive parenting skills so that their children develop in a nurturing household. \\n DDR practitioners should invest in reproductive health awareness-raising initiatives for boys and girls (especially adolescents) covering issues such as safe motherhood, sexual violence, sexually transmitted infections, family planning and the reproductive health of young people. Increasing the awareness of boys will help to reduce the reproductive health burden on girls and enable a gender-transformative approach (see section 4.3). Consideration shall be given to any sensitivities that may arise through the inclusion of boys in these awareness-raising initiatives, and necessary preparations shall be made with families and community leaders to gain their support.", + "Paragraph": "Reproductive health \n As soon as possible after their release from an armed force or group, and for as long as necessary, girls and boys who have survived sexual violence, abuse and exploitation shall receive medical care in addition to mental health and psychosocial care (see section 7.9.1). Consideration shall also be given to boys who may have been forced to perpetrate sexual violence. All children who have experienced sexual violence shall receive access to the Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) for sexual and reproductive health.7 Girl mothers shall be referred to community health services and psychosocial support as a priority. To prevent cycles of violence, girl mothers shall be enabled to learn positive parenting skills so that their children develop in a nurturing household. \n DDR practitioners should invest in reproductive health awareness-raising initiatives for boys and girls (especially adolescents) covering issues such as safe motherhood, sexual violence, sexually transmitted infections, family planning and the reproductive health of young people. Increasing the awareness of boys will help to reduce the reproductive health burden on girls and enable a gender-transformative approach (see section 4.3). Consideration shall be given to any sensitivities that may arise through the inclusion of boys in these awareness-raising initiatives, and necessary preparations shall be made with families and community leaders to gain their support.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -139843,7 +139843,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2312, - "Paragraph": "Reproductive health \\n As soon as possible after their release from an armed force or group, and for as long as necessary, girls and boys who have survived sexual violence, abuse and exploitation shall receive medical care in addition to mental health and psychosocial care (see section 7.9.1). Consideration shall also be given to boys who may have been forced to perpetrate sexual violence. All children who have experienced sexual violence shall receive access to the Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) for sexual and reproductive health.7 Girl mothers shall be referred to community health services and psychosocial support as a priority. To prevent cycles of violence, girl mothers shall be enabled to learn positive parenting skills so that their children develop in a nurturing household. \\n DDR practitioners should invest in reproductive health awareness-raising initiatives for boys and girls (especially adolescents) covering issues such as safe motherhood, sexual violence, sexually transmitted infections, family planning and the reproductive health of young people. Increasing the awareness of boys will help to reduce the reproductive health burden on girls and enable a gender-transformative approach (see section 4.3). Consideration shall be given to any sensitivities that may arise through the inclusion of boys in these awareness-raising initiatives, and necessary preparations shall be made with families and community leaders to gain their support.", + "Paragraph": "Reproductive health \n As soon as possible after their release from an armed force or group, and for as long as necessary, girls and boys who have survived sexual violence, abuse and exploitation shall receive medical care in addition to mental health and psychosocial care (see section 7.9.1). Consideration shall also be given to boys who may have been forced to perpetrate sexual violence. All children who have experienced sexual violence shall receive access to the Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) for sexual and reproductive health.7 Girl mothers shall be referred to community health services and psychosocial support as a priority. To prevent cycles of violence, girl mothers shall be enabled to learn positive parenting skills so that their children develop in a nurturing household. \n DDR practitioners should invest in reproductive health awareness-raising initiatives for boys and girls (especially adolescents) covering issues such as safe motherhood, sexual violence, sexually transmitted infections, family planning and the reproductive health of young people. Increasing the awareness of boys will help to reduce the reproductive health burden on girls and enable a gender-transformative approach (see section 4.3). Consideration shall be given to any sensitivities that may arise through the inclusion of boys in these awareness-raising initiatives, and necessary preparations shall be made with families and community leaders to gain their support.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -139861,7 +139861,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2312, - "Paragraph": "Reproductive health \\n As soon as possible after their release from an armed force or group, and for as long as necessary, girls and boys who have survived sexual violence, abuse and exploitation shall receive medical care in addition to mental health and psychosocial care (see section 7.9.1). Consideration shall also be given to boys who may have been forced to perpetrate sexual violence. All children who have experienced sexual violence shall receive access to the Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) for sexual and reproductive health.7 Girl mothers shall be referred to community health services and psychosocial support as a priority. To prevent cycles of violence, girl mothers shall be enabled to learn positive parenting skills so that their children develop in a nurturing household. \\n DDR practitioners should invest in reproductive health awareness-raising initiatives for boys and girls (especially adolescents) covering issues such as safe motherhood, sexual violence, sexually transmitted infections, family planning and the reproductive health of young people. Increasing the awareness of boys will help to reduce the reproductive health burden on girls and enable a gender-transformative approach (see section 4.3). Consideration shall be given to any sensitivities that may arise through the inclusion of boys in these awareness-raising initiatives, and necessary preparations shall be made with families and community leaders to gain their support.", + "Paragraph": "Reproductive health \n As soon as possible after their release from an armed force or group, and for as long as necessary, girls and boys who have survived sexual violence, abuse and exploitation shall receive medical care in addition to mental health and psychosocial care (see section 7.9.1). Consideration shall also be given to boys who may have been forced to perpetrate sexual violence. All children who have experienced sexual violence shall receive access to the Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) for sexual and reproductive health.7 Girl mothers shall be referred to community health services and psychosocial support as a priority. To prevent cycles of violence, girl mothers shall be enabled to learn positive parenting skills so that their children develop in a nurturing household. \n DDR practitioners should invest in reproductive health awareness-raising initiatives for boys and girls (especially adolescents) covering issues such as safe motherhood, sexual violence, sexually transmitted infections, family planning and the reproductive health of young people. Increasing the awareness of boys will help to reduce the reproductive health burden on girls and enable a gender-transformative approach (see section 4.3). Consideration shall be given to any sensitivities that may arise through the inclusion of boys in these awareness-raising initiatives, and necessary preparations shall be made with families and community leaders to gain their support.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -139879,7 +139879,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2312, - "Paragraph": "Reproductive health \\n As soon as possible after their release from an armed force or group, and for as long as necessary, girls and boys who have survived sexual violence, abuse and exploitation shall receive medical care in addition to mental health and psychosocial care (see section 7.9.1). Consideration shall also be given to boys who may have been forced to perpetrate sexual violence. All children who have experienced sexual violence shall receive access to the Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) for sexual and reproductive health.7 Girl mothers shall be referred to community health services and psychosocial support as a priority. To prevent cycles of violence, girl mothers shall be enabled to learn positive parenting skills so that their children develop in a nurturing household. \\n DDR practitioners should invest in reproductive health awareness-raising initiatives for boys and girls (especially adolescents) covering issues such as safe motherhood, sexual violence, sexually transmitted infections, family planning and the reproductive health of young people. Increasing the awareness of boys will help to reduce the reproductive health burden on girls and enable a gender-transformative approach (see section 4.3). Consideration shall be given to any sensitivities that may arise through the inclusion of boys in these awareness-raising initiatives, and necessary preparations shall be made with families and community leaders to gain their support.", + "Paragraph": "Reproductive health \n As soon as possible after their release from an armed force or group, and for as long as necessary, girls and boys who have survived sexual violence, abuse and exploitation shall receive medical care in addition to mental health and psychosocial care (see section 7.9.1). Consideration shall also be given to boys who may have been forced to perpetrate sexual violence. All children who have experienced sexual violence shall receive access to the Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) for sexual and reproductive health.7 Girl mothers shall be referred to community health services and psychosocial support as a priority. To prevent cycles of violence, girl mothers shall be enabled to learn positive parenting skills so that their children develop in a nurturing household. \n DDR practitioners should invest in reproductive health awareness-raising initiatives for boys and girls (especially adolescents) covering issues such as safe motherhood, sexual violence, sexually transmitted infections, family planning and the reproductive health of young people. Increasing the awareness of boys will help to reduce the reproductive health burden on girls and enable a gender-transformative approach (see section 4.3). Consideration shall be given to any sensitivities that may arise through the inclusion of boys in these awareness-raising initiatives, and necessary preparations shall be made with families and community leaders to gain their support.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -139890,14 +139890,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.1 Health", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n DDR practitioners should invest in reproductive health awareness-raising initiatives for boys and girls (especially adolescents) covering issues such as safe motherhood, sexual violence, sexually transmitted infections, family planning and the reproductive health of young people.", + "Sentence": "\n DDR practitioners should invest in reproductive health awareness-raising initiatives for boys and girls (especially adolescents) covering issues such as safe motherhood, sexual violence, sexually transmitted infections, family planning and the reproductive health of young people.", "newParagraph": "reproductive health n soon possible release armed force group long necessary girl boy survived sexual violence abuse exploitation shall receive medical care addition mental health psychosocial care see section 791 consideration shall also given boy may forced perpetrate sexual violence child experienced sexual violence shall receive access minimum initial service package misp sexual reproductive health7 girl mother shall referred community health service psychosocial support priority prevent cycle violence girl mother shall enabled learn positive parenting skill child develop nurturing household n ddr practitioner invest reproductive health awarenessraising initiative boy girl especially adolescent covering issue safe motherhood sexual violence sexually transmitted infection family planning reproductive health young people increasing awareness boy help reduce reproductive health burden girl enable gendertransformative approach see section 43 consideration shall given sensitivity may arise inclusion boy awarenessraising initiative necessary preparation shall made family community leader gain support", "ProcessedSent": "n ddr practitioner invest reproductive health awarenessraising initiative boy girl especially adolescent covering issue safe motherhood sexual violence sexually transmitted infection family planning reproductive health young people", "SentID": 7771 }, { "ParagraphID": 2312, - "Paragraph": "Reproductive health \\n As soon as possible after their release from an armed force or group, and for as long as necessary, girls and boys who have survived sexual violence, abuse and exploitation shall receive medical care in addition to mental health and psychosocial care (see section 7.9.1). Consideration shall also be given to boys who may have been forced to perpetrate sexual violence. All children who have experienced sexual violence shall receive access to the Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) for sexual and reproductive health.7 Girl mothers shall be referred to community health services and psychosocial support as a priority. To prevent cycles of violence, girl mothers shall be enabled to learn positive parenting skills so that their children develop in a nurturing household. \\n DDR practitioners should invest in reproductive health awareness-raising initiatives for boys and girls (especially adolescents) covering issues such as safe motherhood, sexual violence, sexually transmitted infections, family planning and the reproductive health of young people. Increasing the awareness of boys will help to reduce the reproductive health burden on girls and enable a gender-transformative approach (see section 4.3). Consideration shall be given to any sensitivities that may arise through the inclusion of boys in these awareness-raising initiatives, and necessary preparations shall be made with families and community leaders to gain their support.", + "Paragraph": "Reproductive health \n As soon as possible after their release from an armed force or group, and for as long as necessary, girls and boys who have survived sexual violence, abuse and exploitation shall receive medical care in addition to mental health and psychosocial care (see section 7.9.1). Consideration shall also be given to boys who may have been forced to perpetrate sexual violence. All children who have experienced sexual violence shall receive access to the Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) for sexual and reproductive health.7 Girl mothers shall be referred to community health services and psychosocial support as a priority. To prevent cycles of violence, girl mothers shall be enabled to learn positive parenting skills so that their children develop in a nurturing household. \n DDR practitioners should invest in reproductive health awareness-raising initiatives for boys and girls (especially adolescents) covering issues such as safe motherhood, sexual violence, sexually transmitted infections, family planning and the reproductive health of young people. Increasing the awareness of boys will help to reduce the reproductive health burden on girls and enable a gender-transformative approach (see section 4.3). Consideration shall be given to any sensitivities that may arise through the inclusion of boys in these awareness-raising initiatives, and necessary preparations shall be made with families and community leaders to gain their support.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -139915,7 +139915,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2312, - "Paragraph": "Reproductive health \\n As soon as possible after their release from an armed force or group, and for as long as necessary, girls and boys who have survived sexual violence, abuse and exploitation shall receive medical care in addition to mental health and psychosocial care (see section 7.9.1). Consideration shall also be given to boys who may have been forced to perpetrate sexual violence. All children who have experienced sexual violence shall receive access to the Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) for sexual and reproductive health.7 Girl mothers shall be referred to community health services and psychosocial support as a priority. To prevent cycles of violence, girl mothers shall be enabled to learn positive parenting skills so that their children develop in a nurturing household. \\n DDR practitioners should invest in reproductive health awareness-raising initiatives for boys and girls (especially adolescents) covering issues such as safe motherhood, sexual violence, sexually transmitted infections, family planning and the reproductive health of young people. Increasing the awareness of boys will help to reduce the reproductive health burden on girls and enable a gender-transformative approach (see section 4.3). Consideration shall be given to any sensitivities that may arise through the inclusion of boys in these awareness-raising initiatives, and necessary preparations shall be made with families and community leaders to gain their support.", + "Paragraph": "Reproductive health \n As soon as possible after their release from an armed force or group, and for as long as necessary, girls and boys who have survived sexual violence, abuse and exploitation shall receive medical care in addition to mental health and psychosocial care (see section 7.9.1). Consideration shall also be given to boys who may have been forced to perpetrate sexual violence. All children who have experienced sexual violence shall receive access to the Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) for sexual and reproductive health.7 Girl mothers shall be referred to community health services and psychosocial support as a priority. To prevent cycles of violence, girl mothers shall be enabled to learn positive parenting skills so that their children develop in a nurturing household. \n DDR practitioners should invest in reproductive health awareness-raising initiatives for boys and girls (especially adolescents) covering issues such as safe motherhood, sexual violence, sexually transmitted infections, family planning and the reproductive health of young people. Increasing the awareness of boys will help to reduce the reproductive health burden on girls and enable a gender-transformative approach (see section 4.3). Consideration shall be given to any sensitivities that may arise through the inclusion of boys in these awareness-raising initiatives, and necessary preparations shall be made with families and community leaders to gain their support.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -139933,7 +139933,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2313, - "Paragraph": "HIV\/AIDS \\n Children who test positive for HIV\/AIDS may experience additional community stigmatization that negatively impacts upon their reintegration. Initial screening and testing for HIV\/AIDS shall be provided to CAAFAG during demobilization in a manner that voluntary and confidential. During reintegration, support for children living with HIV\/AIDS should include specialist counselling by personnel with experience of working with children, support to families, targeted referrals to existing medical facilities and linkages to local, national and\/or international health programmes. To ease reintegration, community-based HIV\/AIDS awareness training and education can be considered (see IDDRS 5.60 on HIV\/AIDS and DDR). Children may also prefer to receive treatment in locations that are discreet (i.e., not in public spaces or through discreet entrances at clinics).", + "Paragraph": "HIV\/AIDS \n Children who test positive for HIV\/AIDS may experience additional community stigmatization that negatively impacts upon their reintegration. Initial screening and testing for HIV\/AIDS shall be provided to CAAFAG during demobilization in a manner that voluntary and confidential. During reintegration, support for children living with HIV\/AIDS should include specialist counselling by personnel with experience of working with children, support to families, targeted referrals to existing medical facilities and linkages to local, national and\/or international health programmes. To ease reintegration, community-based HIV\/AIDS awareness training and education can be considered (see IDDRS 5.60 on HIV\/AIDS and DDR). Children may also prefer to receive treatment in locations that are discreet (i.e., not in public spaces or through discreet entrances at clinics).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -139944,14 +139944,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.1 Health", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "HIV\/AIDS \\n Children who test positive for HIV\/AIDS may experience additional community stigmatization that negatively impacts upon their reintegration.", + "Sentence": "HIV\/AIDS \n Children who test positive for HIV\/AIDS may experience additional community stigmatization that negatively impacts upon their reintegration.", "newParagraph": "hivaids n child test positive hivaids may experience additional community stigmatization negatively impact upon reintegration initial screening testing hivaids shall provided caafag demobilization manner voluntary confidential reintegration support child living hivaids include specialist counselling personnel experience working child support family targeted referral existing medical facility linkage local national andor international health programme ease reintegration communitybased hivaids awareness training education considered see iddrs 560 hivaids ddr child may also prefer receive treatment location discreet ie public space discreet entrance clinic", "ProcessedSent": "hivaids n child test positive hivaids may experience additional community stigmatization negatively impact upon reintegration", "SentID": 7774 }, { "ParagraphID": 2313, - "Paragraph": "HIV\/AIDS \\n Children who test positive for HIV\/AIDS may experience additional community stigmatization that negatively impacts upon their reintegration. Initial screening and testing for HIV\/AIDS shall be provided to CAAFAG during demobilization in a manner that voluntary and confidential. During reintegration, support for children living with HIV\/AIDS should include specialist counselling by personnel with experience of working with children, support to families, targeted referrals to existing medical facilities and linkages to local, national and\/or international health programmes. To ease reintegration, community-based HIV\/AIDS awareness training and education can be considered (see IDDRS 5.60 on HIV\/AIDS and DDR). Children may also prefer to receive treatment in locations that are discreet (i.e., not in public spaces or through discreet entrances at clinics).", + "Paragraph": "HIV\/AIDS \n Children who test positive for HIV\/AIDS may experience additional community stigmatization that negatively impacts upon their reintegration. Initial screening and testing for HIV\/AIDS shall be provided to CAAFAG during demobilization in a manner that voluntary and confidential. During reintegration, support for children living with HIV\/AIDS should include specialist counselling by personnel with experience of working with children, support to families, targeted referrals to existing medical facilities and linkages to local, national and\/or international health programmes. To ease reintegration, community-based HIV\/AIDS awareness training and education can be considered (see IDDRS 5.60 on HIV\/AIDS and DDR). Children may also prefer to receive treatment in locations that are discreet (i.e., not in public spaces or through discreet entrances at clinics).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -139969,7 +139969,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2313, - "Paragraph": "HIV\/AIDS \\n Children who test positive for HIV\/AIDS may experience additional community stigmatization that negatively impacts upon their reintegration. Initial screening and testing for HIV\/AIDS shall be provided to CAAFAG during demobilization in a manner that voluntary and confidential. During reintegration, support for children living with HIV\/AIDS should include specialist counselling by personnel with experience of working with children, support to families, targeted referrals to existing medical facilities and linkages to local, national and\/or international health programmes. To ease reintegration, community-based HIV\/AIDS awareness training and education can be considered (see IDDRS 5.60 on HIV\/AIDS and DDR). Children may also prefer to receive treatment in locations that are discreet (i.e., not in public spaces or through discreet entrances at clinics).", + "Paragraph": "HIV\/AIDS \n Children who test positive for HIV\/AIDS may experience additional community stigmatization that negatively impacts upon their reintegration. Initial screening and testing for HIV\/AIDS shall be provided to CAAFAG during demobilization in a manner that voluntary and confidential. During reintegration, support for children living with HIV\/AIDS should include specialist counselling by personnel with experience of working with children, support to families, targeted referrals to existing medical facilities and linkages to local, national and\/or international health programmes. To ease reintegration, community-based HIV\/AIDS awareness training and education can be considered (see IDDRS 5.60 on HIV\/AIDS and DDR). Children may also prefer to receive treatment in locations that are discreet (i.e., not in public spaces or through discreet entrances at clinics).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -139987,7 +139987,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2313, - "Paragraph": "HIV\/AIDS \\n Children who test positive for HIV\/AIDS may experience additional community stigmatization that negatively impacts upon their reintegration. Initial screening and testing for HIV\/AIDS shall be provided to CAAFAG during demobilization in a manner that voluntary and confidential. During reintegration, support for children living with HIV\/AIDS should include specialist counselling by personnel with experience of working with children, support to families, targeted referrals to existing medical facilities and linkages to local, national and\/or international health programmes. To ease reintegration, community-based HIV\/AIDS awareness training and education can be considered (see IDDRS 5.60 on HIV\/AIDS and DDR). Children may also prefer to receive treatment in locations that are discreet (i.e., not in public spaces or through discreet entrances at clinics).", + "Paragraph": "HIV\/AIDS \n Children who test positive for HIV\/AIDS may experience additional community stigmatization that negatively impacts upon their reintegration. Initial screening and testing for HIV\/AIDS shall be provided to CAAFAG during demobilization in a manner that voluntary and confidential. During reintegration, support for children living with HIV\/AIDS should include specialist counselling by personnel with experience of working with children, support to families, targeted referrals to existing medical facilities and linkages to local, national and\/or international health programmes. To ease reintegration, community-based HIV\/AIDS awareness training and education can be considered (see IDDRS 5.60 on HIV\/AIDS and DDR). Children may also prefer to receive treatment in locations that are discreet (i.e., not in public spaces or through discreet entrances at clinics).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -140005,7 +140005,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2313, - "Paragraph": "HIV\/AIDS \\n Children who test positive for HIV\/AIDS may experience additional community stigmatization that negatively impacts upon their reintegration. Initial screening and testing for HIV\/AIDS shall be provided to CAAFAG during demobilization in a manner that voluntary and confidential. During reintegration, support for children living with HIV\/AIDS should include specialist counselling by personnel with experience of working with children, support to families, targeted referrals to existing medical facilities and linkages to local, national and\/or international health programmes. To ease reintegration, community-based HIV\/AIDS awareness training and education can be considered (see IDDRS 5.60 on HIV\/AIDS and DDR). Children may also prefer to receive treatment in locations that are discreet (i.e., not in public spaces or through discreet entrances at clinics).", + "Paragraph": "HIV\/AIDS \n Children who test positive for HIV\/AIDS may experience additional community stigmatization that negatively impacts upon their reintegration. Initial screening and testing for HIV\/AIDS shall be provided to CAAFAG during demobilization in a manner that voluntary and confidential. During reintegration, support for children living with HIV\/AIDS should include specialist counselling by personnel with experience of working with children, support to families, targeted referrals to existing medical facilities and linkages to local, national and\/or international health programmes. To ease reintegration, community-based HIV\/AIDS awareness training and education can be considered (see IDDRS 5.60 on HIV\/AIDS and DDR). Children may also prefer to receive treatment in locations that are discreet (i.e., not in public spaces or through discreet entrances at clinics).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -140023,7 +140023,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2314, - "Paragraph": "Drug and alcohol addiction \\n Drugs and alcohol are often used by commanders to establish dependence, manipulate and coerce children into committing violence. Children\u2019s substance use can create obstacles to reintegration such as behavioural issues in the home and community, risk-taking behaviour, poor nutrition and general health, and increased vulnerability to re-recruitment. DDR practitioners should coordinate with child-focused local, national and\/or international health organizations to develop or identify for referral drug and alcohol rehabilitation programmes adapted to the needs of CAAFAG. Treatment shall follow the International Standards for the Treatment of Drug Use Disorders.8", + "Paragraph": "Drug and alcohol addiction \n Drugs and alcohol are often used by commanders to establish dependence, manipulate and coerce children into committing violence. Children\u2019s substance use can create obstacles to reintegration such as behavioural issues in the home and community, risk-taking behaviour, poor nutrition and general health, and increased vulnerability to re-recruitment. DDR practitioners should coordinate with child-focused local, national and\/or international health organizations to develop or identify for referral drug and alcohol rehabilitation programmes adapted to the needs of CAAFAG. Treatment shall follow the International Standards for the Treatment of Drug Use Disorders.8", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -140034,14 +140034,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.1 Health", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Drug and alcohol addiction \\n Drugs and alcohol are often used by commanders to establish dependence, manipulate and coerce children into committing violence.", + "Sentence": "Drug and alcohol addiction \n Drugs and alcohol are often used by commanders to establish dependence, manipulate and coerce children into committing violence.", "newParagraph": "drug alcohol addiction n drug alcohol often used commander establish dependence manipulate coerce child committing violence child substance use create obstacle reintegration behavioural issue home community risktaking behaviour poor nutrition general health increased vulnerability rerecruitment ddr practitioner coordinate childfocused local national andor international health organization develop identify referral drug alcohol rehabilitation programme adapted need caafag treatment shall follow international standard treatment drug use disorders8", "ProcessedSent": "drug alcohol addiction n drug alcohol often used commander establish dependence manipulate coerce child committing violence", "SentID": 7779 }, { "ParagraphID": 2314, - "Paragraph": "Drug and alcohol addiction \\n Drugs and alcohol are often used by commanders to establish dependence, manipulate and coerce children into committing violence. Children\u2019s substance use can create obstacles to reintegration such as behavioural issues in the home and community, risk-taking behaviour, poor nutrition and general health, and increased vulnerability to re-recruitment. DDR practitioners should coordinate with child-focused local, national and\/or international health organizations to develop or identify for referral drug and alcohol rehabilitation programmes adapted to the needs of CAAFAG. Treatment shall follow the International Standards for the Treatment of Drug Use Disorders.8", + "Paragraph": "Drug and alcohol addiction \n Drugs and alcohol are often used by commanders to establish dependence, manipulate and coerce children into committing violence. Children\u2019s substance use can create obstacles to reintegration such as behavioural issues in the home and community, risk-taking behaviour, poor nutrition and general health, and increased vulnerability to re-recruitment. DDR practitioners should coordinate with child-focused local, national and\/or international health organizations to develop or identify for referral drug and alcohol rehabilitation programmes adapted to the needs of CAAFAG. Treatment shall follow the International Standards for the Treatment of Drug Use Disorders.8", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -140059,7 +140059,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2314, - "Paragraph": "Drug and alcohol addiction \\n Drugs and alcohol are often used by commanders to establish dependence, manipulate and coerce children into committing violence. Children\u2019s substance use can create obstacles to reintegration such as behavioural issues in the home and community, risk-taking behaviour, poor nutrition and general health, and increased vulnerability to re-recruitment. DDR practitioners should coordinate with child-focused local, national and\/or international health organizations to develop or identify for referral drug and alcohol rehabilitation programmes adapted to the needs of CAAFAG. Treatment shall follow the International Standards for the Treatment of Drug Use Disorders.8", + "Paragraph": "Drug and alcohol addiction \n Drugs and alcohol are often used by commanders to establish dependence, manipulate and coerce children into committing violence. Children\u2019s substance use can create obstacles to reintegration such as behavioural issues in the home and community, risk-taking behaviour, poor nutrition and general health, and increased vulnerability to re-recruitment. DDR practitioners should coordinate with child-focused local, national and\/or international health organizations to develop or identify for referral drug and alcohol rehabilitation programmes adapted to the needs of CAAFAG. Treatment shall follow the International Standards for the Treatment of Drug Use Disorders.8", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -140077,7 +140077,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2314, - "Paragraph": "Drug and alcohol addiction \\n Drugs and alcohol are often used by commanders to establish dependence, manipulate and coerce children into committing violence. Children\u2019s substance use can create obstacles to reintegration such as behavioural issues in the home and community, risk-taking behaviour, poor nutrition and general health, and increased vulnerability to re-recruitment. DDR practitioners should coordinate with child-focused local, national and\/or international health organizations to develop or identify for referral drug and alcohol rehabilitation programmes adapted to the needs of CAAFAG. Treatment shall follow the International Standards for the Treatment of Drug Use Disorders.8", + "Paragraph": "Drug and alcohol addiction \n Drugs and alcohol are often used by commanders to establish dependence, manipulate and coerce children into committing violence. Children\u2019s substance use can create obstacles to reintegration such as behavioural issues in the home and community, risk-taking behaviour, poor nutrition and general health, and increased vulnerability to re-recruitment. DDR practitioners should coordinate with child-focused local, national and\/or international health organizations to develop or identify for referral drug and alcohol rehabilitation programmes adapted to the needs of CAAFAG. Treatment shall follow the International Standards for the Treatment of Drug Use Disorders.8", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -140275,7 +140275,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2318, - "Paragraph": "Mental health and psychosocial support interventions for children in DDR processes shall abide by the following core principles:9 \\n Human rights and equality: Focus on the protection of children most at risk of human rights violations and the promotion of equity and non-discrimination, maximizing fairness across all sub-groups of children. Equality in provision of support includes taking into consideration and tailoring support to the specific, and different needs, of boys and girls. \\n Participation: Ensure the participation of children in decisions affecting them to support their resilience and promote the participation of families and communities, as they are the most important support structures for children\u2019s psychosocial health. \\n Do no harm: Minimize the risk of harm to children through psychosocial support by employing good coordination (with families, communities and other actors), appropriate needs assessments, cultural sensitivity, and ongoing monitoring and reflection on approach. \\n Build on available resources and capacities: Engage with existing structures and self-help mechanisms to root the intervention in local solutions. \\n Integrated support systems: Integrate into wider systems (e.g., existing community support mechanisms, formal\/non-formal school systems, general health services, general mental health services, social services) to reach more people (community-based approaches) and limit stigma. \\n Multilayered supports: A layered system of complementary supports is most effective in meeting different needs: \\n\\n Basic services and security: Securing basic needs (food, shelter, water, basic health care) and ensuring a minimum level of security represent the first steps in mental and psychosocial well-being. \\n\\n Community and family supports: Most children will require some level of family\/community support to address psychosocial disruption. This may include communal healing ceremonies, supportive parenting programmes, formal and non-formal educational activities, livelihood activities and the activation of social networks. \\n\\n Focused, non-specialized supports: More-affected children will require interventions by trained and supervised personnel in areas such as psychological first aid and basic mental health care by primary health-care workers. \\n\\n Specialized services: Targeting the most affected children who exhibit serious mental health and psychosocial symptoms and require either (a) referral to specialized services, if they exist, or (b) initiation of longer-term training and supervision of primary\/general health- care providers.", + "Paragraph": "Mental health and psychosocial support interventions for children in DDR processes shall abide by the following core principles:9 \n Human rights and equality: Focus on the protection of children most at risk of human rights violations and the promotion of equity and non-discrimination, maximizing fairness across all sub-groups of children. Equality in provision of support includes taking into consideration and tailoring support to the specific, and different needs, of boys and girls. \n Participation: Ensure the participation of children in decisions affecting them to support their resilience and promote the participation of families and communities, as they are the most important support structures for children\u2019s psychosocial health. \n Do no harm: Minimize the risk of harm to children through psychosocial support by employing good coordination (with families, communities and other actors), appropriate needs assessments, cultural sensitivity, and ongoing monitoring and reflection on approach. \n Build on available resources and capacities: Engage with existing structures and self-help mechanisms to root the intervention in local solutions. \n Integrated support systems: Integrate into wider systems (e.g., existing community support mechanisms, formal\/non-formal school systems, general health services, general mental health services, social services) to reach more people (community-based approaches) and limit stigma. \n Multilayered supports: A layered system of complementary supports is most effective in meeting different needs: \n\n Basic services and security: Securing basic needs (food, shelter, water, basic health care) and ensuring a minimum level of security represent the first steps in mental and psychosocial well-being. \n\n Community and family supports: Most children will require some level of family\/community support to address psychosocial disruption. This may include communal healing ceremonies, supportive parenting programmes, formal and non-formal educational activities, livelihood activities and the activation of social networks. \n\n Focused, non-specialized supports: More-affected children will require interventions by trained and supervised personnel in areas such as psychological first aid and basic mental health care by primary health-care workers. \n\n Specialized services: Targeting the most affected children who exhibit serious mental health and psychosocial symptoms and require either (a) referral to specialized services, if they exist, or (b) initiation of longer-term training and supervision of primary\/general health- care providers.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -140286,14 +140286,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.2 Psychosocial support and special care", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Mental health and psychosocial support interventions for children in DDR processes shall abide by the following core principles:9 \\n Human rights and equality: Focus on the protection of children most at risk of human rights violations and the promotion of equity and non-discrimination, maximizing fairness across all sub-groups of children.", + "Sentence": "Mental health and psychosocial support interventions for children in DDR processes shall abide by the following core principles:9 \n Human rights and equality: Focus on the protection of children most at risk of human rights violations and the promotion of equity and non-discrimination, maximizing fairness across all sub-groups of children.", "newParagraph": "mental health psychosocial support intervention child ddr process shall abide following core principles9 n human right equality focus protection child risk human right violation promotion equity nondiscrimination maximizing fairness across subgroup child equality provision support includes taking consideration tailoring support specific different need boy girl n participation ensure participation child decision affecting support resilience promote participation family community important support structure child psychosocial health n harm minimize risk harm child psychosocial support employing good coordination family community actor appropriate need assessment cultural sensitivity ongoing monitoring reflection approach n build available resource capacity engage existing structure selfhelp mechanism root intervention local solution n integrated support system integrate wider system eg existing community support mechanism formalnonformal school system general health service general mental health service social service reach people communitybased approach limit stigma n multilayered support layered system complementary support effective meeting different need nn basic service security securing basic need food shelter water basic health care ensuring minimum level security represent first step mental psychosocial wellbeing nn community family support child require level familycommunity support address psychosocial disruption may include communal healing ceremony supportive parenting programme formal nonformal educational activity livelihood activity activation social network nn focused nonspecialized support moreaffected child require intervention trained supervised personnel area psychological first aid basic mental health care primary healthcare worker nn specialized service targeting affected child exhibit serious mental health psychosocial symptom require either referral specialized service exist b initiation longerterm training supervision primarygeneral health care provider", "ProcessedSent": "mental health psychosocial support intervention child ddr process shall abide following core principles9 n human right equality focus protection child risk human right violation promotion equity nondiscrimination maximizing fairness across subgroup child", "SentID": 7793 }, { "ParagraphID": 2318, - "Paragraph": "Mental health and psychosocial support interventions for children in DDR processes shall abide by the following core principles:9 \\n Human rights and equality: Focus on the protection of children most at risk of human rights violations and the promotion of equity and non-discrimination, maximizing fairness across all sub-groups of children. Equality in provision of support includes taking into consideration and tailoring support to the specific, and different needs, of boys and girls. \\n Participation: Ensure the participation of children in decisions affecting them to support their resilience and promote the participation of families and communities, as they are the most important support structures for children\u2019s psychosocial health. \\n Do no harm: Minimize the risk of harm to children through psychosocial support by employing good coordination (with families, communities and other actors), appropriate needs assessments, cultural sensitivity, and ongoing monitoring and reflection on approach. \\n Build on available resources and capacities: Engage with existing structures and self-help mechanisms to root the intervention in local solutions. \\n Integrated support systems: Integrate into wider systems (e.g., existing community support mechanisms, formal\/non-formal school systems, general health services, general mental health services, social services) to reach more people (community-based approaches) and limit stigma. \\n Multilayered supports: A layered system of complementary supports is most effective in meeting different needs: \\n\\n Basic services and security: Securing basic needs (food, shelter, water, basic health care) and ensuring a minimum level of security represent the first steps in mental and psychosocial well-being. \\n\\n Community and family supports: Most children will require some level of family\/community support to address psychosocial disruption. This may include communal healing ceremonies, supportive parenting programmes, formal and non-formal educational activities, livelihood activities and the activation of social networks. \\n\\n Focused, non-specialized supports: More-affected children will require interventions by trained and supervised personnel in areas such as psychological first aid and basic mental health care by primary health-care workers. \\n\\n Specialized services: Targeting the most affected children who exhibit serious mental health and psychosocial symptoms and require either (a) referral to specialized services, if they exist, or (b) initiation of longer-term training and supervision of primary\/general health- care providers.", + "Paragraph": "Mental health and psychosocial support interventions for children in DDR processes shall abide by the following core principles:9 \n Human rights and equality: Focus on the protection of children most at risk of human rights violations and the promotion of equity and non-discrimination, maximizing fairness across all sub-groups of children. Equality in provision of support includes taking into consideration and tailoring support to the specific, and different needs, of boys and girls. \n Participation: Ensure the participation of children in decisions affecting them to support their resilience and promote the participation of families and communities, as they are the most important support structures for children\u2019s psychosocial health. \n Do no harm: Minimize the risk of harm to children through psychosocial support by employing good coordination (with families, communities and other actors), appropriate needs assessments, cultural sensitivity, and ongoing monitoring and reflection on approach. \n Build on available resources and capacities: Engage with existing structures and self-help mechanisms to root the intervention in local solutions. \n Integrated support systems: Integrate into wider systems (e.g., existing community support mechanisms, formal\/non-formal school systems, general health services, general mental health services, social services) to reach more people (community-based approaches) and limit stigma. \n Multilayered supports: A layered system of complementary supports is most effective in meeting different needs: \n\n Basic services and security: Securing basic needs (food, shelter, water, basic health care) and ensuring a minimum level of security represent the first steps in mental and psychosocial well-being. \n\n Community and family supports: Most children will require some level of family\/community support to address psychosocial disruption. This may include communal healing ceremonies, supportive parenting programmes, formal and non-formal educational activities, livelihood activities and the activation of social networks. \n\n Focused, non-specialized supports: More-affected children will require interventions by trained and supervised personnel in areas such as psychological first aid and basic mental health care by primary health-care workers. \n\n Specialized services: Targeting the most affected children who exhibit serious mental health and psychosocial symptoms and require either (a) referral to specialized services, if they exist, or (b) initiation of longer-term training and supervision of primary\/general health- care providers.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -140311,7 +140311,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2318, - "Paragraph": "Mental health and psychosocial support interventions for children in DDR processes shall abide by the following core principles:9 \\n Human rights and equality: Focus on the protection of children most at risk of human rights violations and the promotion of equity and non-discrimination, maximizing fairness across all sub-groups of children. Equality in provision of support includes taking into consideration and tailoring support to the specific, and different needs, of boys and girls. \\n Participation: Ensure the participation of children in decisions affecting them to support their resilience and promote the participation of families and communities, as they are the most important support structures for children\u2019s psychosocial health. \\n Do no harm: Minimize the risk of harm to children through psychosocial support by employing good coordination (with families, communities and other actors), appropriate needs assessments, cultural sensitivity, and ongoing monitoring and reflection on approach. \\n Build on available resources and capacities: Engage with existing structures and self-help mechanisms to root the intervention in local solutions. \\n Integrated support systems: Integrate into wider systems (e.g., existing community support mechanisms, formal\/non-formal school systems, general health services, general mental health services, social services) to reach more people (community-based approaches) and limit stigma. \\n Multilayered supports: A layered system of complementary supports is most effective in meeting different needs: \\n\\n Basic services and security: Securing basic needs (food, shelter, water, basic health care) and ensuring a minimum level of security represent the first steps in mental and psychosocial well-being. \\n\\n Community and family supports: Most children will require some level of family\/community support to address psychosocial disruption. This may include communal healing ceremonies, supportive parenting programmes, formal and non-formal educational activities, livelihood activities and the activation of social networks. \\n\\n Focused, non-specialized supports: More-affected children will require interventions by trained and supervised personnel in areas such as psychological first aid and basic mental health care by primary health-care workers. \\n\\n Specialized services: Targeting the most affected children who exhibit serious mental health and psychosocial symptoms and require either (a) referral to specialized services, if they exist, or (b) initiation of longer-term training and supervision of primary\/general health- care providers.", + "Paragraph": "Mental health and psychosocial support interventions for children in DDR processes shall abide by the following core principles:9 \n Human rights and equality: Focus on the protection of children most at risk of human rights violations and the promotion of equity and non-discrimination, maximizing fairness across all sub-groups of children. Equality in provision of support includes taking into consideration and tailoring support to the specific, and different needs, of boys and girls. \n Participation: Ensure the participation of children in decisions affecting them to support their resilience and promote the participation of families and communities, as they are the most important support structures for children\u2019s psychosocial health. \n Do no harm: Minimize the risk of harm to children through psychosocial support by employing good coordination (with families, communities and other actors), appropriate needs assessments, cultural sensitivity, and ongoing monitoring and reflection on approach. \n Build on available resources and capacities: Engage with existing structures and self-help mechanisms to root the intervention in local solutions. \n Integrated support systems: Integrate into wider systems (e.g., existing community support mechanisms, formal\/non-formal school systems, general health services, general mental health services, social services) to reach more people (community-based approaches) and limit stigma. \n Multilayered supports: A layered system of complementary supports is most effective in meeting different needs: \n\n Basic services and security: Securing basic needs (food, shelter, water, basic health care) and ensuring a minimum level of security represent the first steps in mental and psychosocial well-being. \n\n Community and family supports: Most children will require some level of family\/community support to address psychosocial disruption. This may include communal healing ceremonies, supportive parenting programmes, formal and non-formal educational activities, livelihood activities and the activation of social networks. \n\n Focused, non-specialized supports: More-affected children will require interventions by trained and supervised personnel in areas such as psychological first aid and basic mental health care by primary health-care workers. \n\n Specialized services: Targeting the most affected children who exhibit serious mental health and psychosocial symptoms and require either (a) referral to specialized services, if they exist, or (b) initiation of longer-term training and supervision of primary\/general health- care providers.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -140322,14 +140322,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.2 Psychosocial support and special care", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Participation: Ensure the participation of children in decisions affecting them to support their resilience and promote the participation of families and communities, as they are the most important support structures for children\u2019s psychosocial health.", + "Sentence": "\n Participation: Ensure the participation of children in decisions affecting them to support their resilience and promote the participation of families and communities, as they are the most important support structures for children\u2019s psychosocial health.", "newParagraph": "mental health psychosocial support intervention child ddr process shall abide following core principles9 n human right equality focus protection child risk human right violation promotion equity nondiscrimination maximizing fairness across subgroup child equality provision support includes taking consideration tailoring support specific different need boy girl n participation ensure participation child decision affecting support resilience promote participation family community important support structure child psychosocial health n harm minimize risk harm child psychosocial support employing good coordination family community actor appropriate need assessment cultural sensitivity ongoing monitoring reflection approach n build available resource capacity engage existing structure selfhelp mechanism root intervention local solution n integrated support system integrate wider system eg existing community support mechanism formalnonformal school system general health service general mental health service social service reach people communitybased approach limit stigma n multilayered support layered system complementary support effective meeting different need nn basic service security securing basic need food shelter water basic health care ensuring minimum level security represent first step mental psychosocial wellbeing nn community family support child require level familycommunity support address psychosocial disruption may include communal healing ceremony supportive parenting programme formal nonformal educational activity livelihood activity activation social network nn focused nonspecialized support moreaffected child require intervention trained supervised personnel area psychological first aid basic mental health care primary healthcare worker nn specialized service targeting affected child exhibit serious mental health psychosocial symptom require either referral specialized service exist b initiation longerterm training supervision primarygeneral health care provider", "ProcessedSent": "n participation ensure participation child decision affecting support resilience promote participation family community important support structure child psychosocial health", "SentID": 7795 }, { "ParagraphID": 2318, - "Paragraph": "Mental health and psychosocial support interventions for children in DDR processes shall abide by the following core principles:9 \\n Human rights and equality: Focus on the protection of children most at risk of human rights violations and the promotion of equity and non-discrimination, maximizing fairness across all sub-groups of children. Equality in provision of support includes taking into consideration and tailoring support to the specific, and different needs, of boys and girls. \\n Participation: Ensure the participation of children in decisions affecting them to support their resilience and promote the participation of families and communities, as they are the most important support structures for children\u2019s psychosocial health. \\n Do no harm: Minimize the risk of harm to children through psychosocial support by employing good coordination (with families, communities and other actors), appropriate needs assessments, cultural sensitivity, and ongoing monitoring and reflection on approach. \\n Build on available resources and capacities: Engage with existing structures and self-help mechanisms to root the intervention in local solutions. \\n Integrated support systems: Integrate into wider systems (e.g., existing community support mechanisms, formal\/non-formal school systems, general health services, general mental health services, social services) to reach more people (community-based approaches) and limit stigma. \\n Multilayered supports: A layered system of complementary supports is most effective in meeting different needs: \\n\\n Basic services and security: Securing basic needs (food, shelter, water, basic health care) and ensuring a minimum level of security represent the first steps in mental and psychosocial well-being. \\n\\n Community and family supports: Most children will require some level of family\/community support to address psychosocial disruption. This may include communal healing ceremonies, supportive parenting programmes, formal and non-formal educational activities, livelihood activities and the activation of social networks. \\n\\n Focused, non-specialized supports: More-affected children will require interventions by trained and supervised personnel in areas such as psychological first aid and basic mental health care by primary health-care workers. \\n\\n Specialized services: Targeting the most affected children who exhibit serious mental health and psychosocial symptoms and require either (a) referral to specialized services, if they exist, or (b) initiation of longer-term training and supervision of primary\/general health- care providers.", + "Paragraph": "Mental health and psychosocial support interventions for children in DDR processes shall abide by the following core principles:9 \n Human rights and equality: Focus on the protection of children most at risk of human rights violations and the promotion of equity and non-discrimination, maximizing fairness across all sub-groups of children. Equality in provision of support includes taking into consideration and tailoring support to the specific, and different needs, of boys and girls. \n Participation: Ensure the participation of children in decisions affecting them to support their resilience and promote the participation of families and communities, as they are the most important support structures for children\u2019s psychosocial health. \n Do no harm: Minimize the risk of harm to children through psychosocial support by employing good coordination (with families, communities and other actors), appropriate needs assessments, cultural sensitivity, and ongoing monitoring and reflection on approach. \n Build on available resources and capacities: Engage with existing structures and self-help mechanisms to root the intervention in local solutions. \n Integrated support systems: Integrate into wider systems (e.g., existing community support mechanisms, formal\/non-formal school systems, general health services, general mental health services, social services) to reach more people (community-based approaches) and limit stigma. \n Multilayered supports: A layered system of complementary supports is most effective in meeting different needs: \n\n Basic services and security: Securing basic needs (food, shelter, water, basic health care) and ensuring a minimum level of security represent the first steps in mental and psychosocial well-being. \n\n Community and family supports: Most children will require some level of family\/community support to address psychosocial disruption. This may include communal healing ceremonies, supportive parenting programmes, formal and non-formal educational activities, livelihood activities and the activation of social networks. \n\n Focused, non-specialized supports: More-affected children will require interventions by trained and supervised personnel in areas such as psychological first aid and basic mental health care by primary health-care workers. \n\n Specialized services: Targeting the most affected children who exhibit serious mental health and psychosocial symptoms and require either (a) referral to specialized services, if they exist, or (b) initiation of longer-term training and supervision of primary\/general health- care providers.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -140340,14 +140340,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.2 Psychosocial support and special care", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Do no harm: Minimize the risk of harm to children through psychosocial support by employing good coordination (with families, communities and other actors), appropriate needs assessments, cultural sensitivity, and ongoing monitoring and reflection on approach.", + "Sentence": "\n Do no harm: Minimize the risk of harm to children through psychosocial support by employing good coordination (with families, communities and other actors), appropriate needs assessments, cultural sensitivity, and ongoing monitoring and reflection on approach.", "newParagraph": "mental health psychosocial support intervention child ddr process shall abide following core principles9 n human right equality focus protection child risk human right violation promotion equity nondiscrimination maximizing fairness across subgroup child equality provision support includes taking consideration tailoring support specific different need boy girl n participation ensure participation child decision affecting support resilience promote participation family community important support structure child psychosocial health n harm minimize risk harm child psychosocial support employing good coordination family community actor appropriate need assessment cultural sensitivity ongoing monitoring reflection approach n build available resource capacity engage existing structure selfhelp mechanism root intervention local solution n integrated support system integrate wider system eg existing community support mechanism formalnonformal school system general health service general mental health service social service reach people communitybased approach limit stigma n multilayered support layered system complementary support effective meeting different need nn basic service security securing basic need food shelter water basic health care ensuring minimum level security represent first step mental psychosocial wellbeing nn community family support child require level familycommunity support address psychosocial disruption may include communal healing ceremony supportive parenting programme formal nonformal educational activity livelihood activity activation social network nn focused nonspecialized support moreaffected child require intervention trained supervised personnel area psychological first aid basic mental health care primary healthcare worker nn specialized service targeting affected child exhibit serious mental health psychosocial symptom require either referral specialized service exist b initiation longerterm training supervision primarygeneral health care provider", "ProcessedSent": "n harm minimize risk harm child psychosocial support employing good coordination family community actor appropriate need assessment cultural sensitivity ongoing monitoring reflection approach", "SentID": 7796 }, { "ParagraphID": 2318, - "Paragraph": "Mental health and psychosocial support interventions for children in DDR processes shall abide by the following core principles:9 \\n Human rights and equality: Focus on the protection of children most at risk of human rights violations and the promotion of equity and non-discrimination, maximizing fairness across all sub-groups of children. Equality in provision of support includes taking into consideration and tailoring support to the specific, and different needs, of boys and girls. \\n Participation: Ensure the participation of children in decisions affecting them to support their resilience and promote the participation of families and communities, as they are the most important support structures for children\u2019s psychosocial health. \\n Do no harm: Minimize the risk of harm to children through psychosocial support by employing good coordination (with families, communities and other actors), appropriate needs assessments, cultural sensitivity, and ongoing monitoring and reflection on approach. \\n Build on available resources and capacities: Engage with existing structures and self-help mechanisms to root the intervention in local solutions. \\n Integrated support systems: Integrate into wider systems (e.g., existing community support mechanisms, formal\/non-formal school systems, general health services, general mental health services, social services) to reach more people (community-based approaches) and limit stigma. \\n Multilayered supports: A layered system of complementary supports is most effective in meeting different needs: \\n\\n Basic services and security: Securing basic needs (food, shelter, water, basic health care) and ensuring a minimum level of security represent the first steps in mental and psychosocial well-being. \\n\\n Community and family supports: Most children will require some level of family\/community support to address psychosocial disruption. This may include communal healing ceremonies, supportive parenting programmes, formal and non-formal educational activities, livelihood activities and the activation of social networks. \\n\\n Focused, non-specialized supports: More-affected children will require interventions by trained and supervised personnel in areas such as psychological first aid and basic mental health care by primary health-care workers. \\n\\n Specialized services: Targeting the most affected children who exhibit serious mental health and psychosocial symptoms and require either (a) referral to specialized services, if they exist, or (b) initiation of longer-term training and supervision of primary\/general health- care providers.", + "Paragraph": "Mental health and psychosocial support interventions for children in DDR processes shall abide by the following core principles:9 \n Human rights and equality: Focus on the protection of children most at risk of human rights violations and the promotion of equity and non-discrimination, maximizing fairness across all sub-groups of children. Equality in provision of support includes taking into consideration and tailoring support to the specific, and different needs, of boys and girls. \n Participation: Ensure the participation of children in decisions affecting them to support their resilience and promote the participation of families and communities, as they are the most important support structures for children\u2019s psychosocial health. \n Do no harm: Minimize the risk of harm to children through psychosocial support by employing good coordination (with families, communities and other actors), appropriate needs assessments, cultural sensitivity, and ongoing monitoring and reflection on approach. \n Build on available resources and capacities: Engage with existing structures and self-help mechanisms to root the intervention in local solutions. \n Integrated support systems: Integrate into wider systems (e.g., existing community support mechanisms, formal\/non-formal school systems, general health services, general mental health services, social services) to reach more people (community-based approaches) and limit stigma. \n Multilayered supports: A layered system of complementary supports is most effective in meeting different needs: \n\n Basic services and security: Securing basic needs (food, shelter, water, basic health care) and ensuring a minimum level of security represent the first steps in mental and psychosocial well-being. \n\n Community and family supports: Most children will require some level of family\/community support to address psychosocial disruption. This may include communal healing ceremonies, supportive parenting programmes, formal and non-formal educational activities, livelihood activities and the activation of social networks. \n\n Focused, non-specialized supports: More-affected children will require interventions by trained and supervised personnel in areas such as psychological first aid and basic mental health care by primary health-care workers. \n\n Specialized services: Targeting the most affected children who exhibit serious mental health and psychosocial symptoms and require either (a) referral to specialized services, if they exist, or (b) initiation of longer-term training and supervision of primary\/general health- care providers.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -140358,14 +140358,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.2 Psychosocial support and special care", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Build on available resources and capacities: Engage with existing structures and self-help mechanisms to root the intervention in local solutions.", + "Sentence": "\n Build on available resources and capacities: Engage with existing structures and self-help mechanisms to root the intervention in local solutions.", "newParagraph": "mental health psychosocial support intervention child ddr process shall abide following core principles9 n human right equality focus protection child risk human right violation promotion equity nondiscrimination maximizing fairness across subgroup child equality provision support includes taking consideration tailoring support specific different need boy girl n participation ensure participation child decision affecting support resilience promote participation family community important support structure child psychosocial health n harm minimize risk harm child psychosocial support employing good coordination family community actor appropriate need assessment cultural sensitivity ongoing monitoring reflection approach n build available resource capacity engage existing structure selfhelp mechanism root intervention local solution n integrated support system integrate wider system eg existing community support mechanism formalnonformal school system general health service general mental health service social service reach people communitybased approach limit stigma n multilayered support layered system complementary support effective meeting different need nn basic service security securing basic need food shelter water basic health care ensuring minimum level security represent first step mental psychosocial wellbeing nn community family support child require level familycommunity support address psychosocial disruption may include communal healing ceremony supportive parenting programme formal nonformal educational activity livelihood activity activation social network nn focused nonspecialized support moreaffected child require intervention trained supervised personnel area psychological first aid basic mental health care primary healthcare worker nn specialized service targeting affected child exhibit serious mental health psychosocial symptom require either referral specialized service exist b initiation longerterm training supervision primarygeneral health care provider", "ProcessedSent": "n build available resource capacity engage existing structure selfhelp mechanism root intervention local solution", "SentID": 7797 }, { "ParagraphID": 2318, - "Paragraph": "Mental health and psychosocial support interventions for children in DDR processes shall abide by the following core principles:9 \\n Human rights and equality: Focus on the protection of children most at risk of human rights violations and the promotion of equity and non-discrimination, maximizing fairness across all sub-groups of children. Equality in provision of support includes taking into consideration and tailoring support to the specific, and different needs, of boys and girls. \\n Participation: Ensure the participation of children in decisions affecting them to support their resilience and promote the participation of families and communities, as they are the most important support structures for children\u2019s psychosocial health. \\n Do no harm: Minimize the risk of harm to children through psychosocial support by employing good coordination (with families, communities and other actors), appropriate needs assessments, cultural sensitivity, and ongoing monitoring and reflection on approach. \\n Build on available resources and capacities: Engage with existing structures and self-help mechanisms to root the intervention in local solutions. \\n Integrated support systems: Integrate into wider systems (e.g., existing community support mechanisms, formal\/non-formal school systems, general health services, general mental health services, social services) to reach more people (community-based approaches) and limit stigma. \\n Multilayered supports: A layered system of complementary supports is most effective in meeting different needs: \\n\\n Basic services and security: Securing basic needs (food, shelter, water, basic health care) and ensuring a minimum level of security represent the first steps in mental and psychosocial well-being. \\n\\n Community and family supports: Most children will require some level of family\/community support to address psychosocial disruption. This may include communal healing ceremonies, supportive parenting programmes, formal and non-formal educational activities, livelihood activities and the activation of social networks. \\n\\n Focused, non-specialized supports: More-affected children will require interventions by trained and supervised personnel in areas such as psychological first aid and basic mental health care by primary health-care workers. \\n\\n Specialized services: Targeting the most affected children who exhibit serious mental health and psychosocial symptoms and require either (a) referral to specialized services, if they exist, or (b) initiation of longer-term training and supervision of primary\/general health- care providers.", + "Paragraph": "Mental health and psychosocial support interventions for children in DDR processes shall abide by the following core principles:9 \n Human rights and equality: Focus on the protection of children most at risk of human rights violations and the promotion of equity and non-discrimination, maximizing fairness across all sub-groups of children. Equality in provision of support includes taking into consideration and tailoring support to the specific, and different needs, of boys and girls. \n Participation: Ensure the participation of children in decisions affecting them to support their resilience and promote the participation of families and communities, as they are the most important support structures for children\u2019s psychosocial health. \n Do no harm: Minimize the risk of harm to children through psychosocial support by employing good coordination (with families, communities and other actors), appropriate needs assessments, cultural sensitivity, and ongoing monitoring and reflection on approach. \n Build on available resources and capacities: Engage with existing structures and self-help mechanisms to root the intervention in local solutions. \n Integrated support systems: Integrate into wider systems (e.g., existing community support mechanisms, formal\/non-formal school systems, general health services, general mental health services, social services) to reach more people (community-based approaches) and limit stigma. \n Multilayered supports: A layered system of complementary supports is most effective in meeting different needs: \n\n Basic services and security: Securing basic needs (food, shelter, water, basic health care) and ensuring a minimum level of security represent the first steps in mental and psychosocial well-being. \n\n Community and family supports: Most children will require some level of family\/community support to address psychosocial disruption. This may include communal healing ceremonies, supportive parenting programmes, formal and non-formal educational activities, livelihood activities and the activation of social networks. \n\n Focused, non-specialized supports: More-affected children will require interventions by trained and supervised personnel in areas such as psychological first aid and basic mental health care by primary health-care workers. \n\n Specialized services: Targeting the most affected children who exhibit serious mental health and psychosocial symptoms and require either (a) referral to specialized services, if they exist, or (b) initiation of longer-term training and supervision of primary\/general health- care providers.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -140376,14 +140376,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.2 Psychosocial support and special care", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Integrated support systems: Integrate into wider systems (e.g., existing community support mechanisms, formal\/non-formal school systems, general health services, general mental health services, social services) to reach more people (community-based approaches) and limit stigma.", + "Sentence": "\n Integrated support systems: Integrate into wider systems (e.g., existing community support mechanisms, formal\/non-formal school systems, general health services, general mental health services, social services) to reach more people (community-based approaches) and limit stigma.", "newParagraph": "mental health psychosocial support intervention child ddr process shall abide following core principles9 n human right equality focus protection child risk human right violation promotion equity nondiscrimination maximizing fairness across subgroup child equality provision support includes taking consideration tailoring support specific different need boy girl n participation ensure participation child decision affecting support resilience promote participation family community important support structure child psychosocial health n harm minimize risk harm child psychosocial support employing good coordination family community actor appropriate need assessment cultural sensitivity ongoing monitoring reflection approach n build available resource capacity engage existing structure selfhelp mechanism root intervention local solution n integrated support system integrate wider system eg existing community support mechanism formalnonformal school system general health service general mental health service social service reach people communitybased approach limit stigma n multilayered support layered system complementary support effective meeting different need nn basic service security securing basic need food shelter water basic health care ensuring minimum level security represent first step mental psychosocial wellbeing nn community family support child require level familycommunity support address psychosocial disruption may include communal healing ceremony supportive parenting programme formal nonformal educational activity livelihood activity activation social network nn focused nonspecialized support moreaffected child require intervention trained supervised personnel area psychological first aid basic mental health care primary healthcare worker nn specialized service targeting affected child exhibit serious mental health psychosocial symptom require either referral specialized service exist b initiation longerterm training supervision primarygeneral health care provider", "ProcessedSent": "n integrated support system integrate wider system eg existing community support mechanism formalnonformal school system general health service general mental health service social service reach people communitybased approach limit stigma", "SentID": 7798 }, { "ParagraphID": 2318, - "Paragraph": "Mental health and psychosocial support interventions for children in DDR processes shall abide by the following core principles:9 \\n Human rights and equality: Focus on the protection of children most at risk of human rights violations and the promotion of equity and non-discrimination, maximizing fairness across all sub-groups of children. Equality in provision of support includes taking into consideration and tailoring support to the specific, and different needs, of boys and girls. \\n Participation: Ensure the participation of children in decisions affecting them to support their resilience and promote the participation of families and communities, as they are the most important support structures for children\u2019s psychosocial health. \\n Do no harm: Minimize the risk of harm to children through psychosocial support by employing good coordination (with families, communities and other actors), appropriate needs assessments, cultural sensitivity, and ongoing monitoring and reflection on approach. \\n Build on available resources and capacities: Engage with existing structures and self-help mechanisms to root the intervention in local solutions. \\n Integrated support systems: Integrate into wider systems (e.g., existing community support mechanisms, formal\/non-formal school systems, general health services, general mental health services, social services) to reach more people (community-based approaches) and limit stigma. \\n Multilayered supports: A layered system of complementary supports is most effective in meeting different needs: \\n\\n Basic services and security: Securing basic needs (food, shelter, water, basic health care) and ensuring a minimum level of security represent the first steps in mental and psychosocial well-being. \\n\\n Community and family supports: Most children will require some level of family\/community support to address psychosocial disruption. This may include communal healing ceremonies, supportive parenting programmes, formal and non-formal educational activities, livelihood activities and the activation of social networks. \\n\\n Focused, non-specialized supports: More-affected children will require interventions by trained and supervised personnel in areas such as psychological first aid and basic mental health care by primary health-care workers. \\n\\n Specialized services: Targeting the most affected children who exhibit serious mental health and psychosocial symptoms and require either (a) referral to specialized services, if they exist, or (b) initiation of longer-term training and supervision of primary\/general health- care providers.", + "Paragraph": "Mental health and psychosocial support interventions for children in DDR processes shall abide by the following core principles:9 \n Human rights and equality: Focus on the protection of children most at risk of human rights violations and the promotion of equity and non-discrimination, maximizing fairness across all sub-groups of children. Equality in provision of support includes taking into consideration and tailoring support to the specific, and different needs, of boys and girls. \n Participation: Ensure the participation of children in decisions affecting them to support their resilience and promote the participation of families and communities, as they are the most important support structures for children\u2019s psychosocial health. \n Do no harm: Minimize the risk of harm to children through psychosocial support by employing good coordination (with families, communities and other actors), appropriate needs assessments, cultural sensitivity, and ongoing monitoring and reflection on approach. \n Build on available resources and capacities: Engage with existing structures and self-help mechanisms to root the intervention in local solutions. \n Integrated support systems: Integrate into wider systems (e.g., existing community support mechanisms, formal\/non-formal school systems, general health services, general mental health services, social services) to reach more people (community-based approaches) and limit stigma. \n Multilayered supports: A layered system of complementary supports is most effective in meeting different needs: \n\n Basic services and security: Securing basic needs (food, shelter, water, basic health care) and ensuring a minimum level of security represent the first steps in mental and psychosocial well-being. \n\n Community and family supports: Most children will require some level of family\/community support to address psychosocial disruption. This may include communal healing ceremonies, supportive parenting programmes, formal and non-formal educational activities, livelihood activities and the activation of social networks. \n\n Focused, non-specialized supports: More-affected children will require interventions by trained and supervised personnel in areas such as psychological first aid and basic mental health care by primary health-care workers. \n\n Specialized services: Targeting the most affected children who exhibit serious mental health and psychosocial symptoms and require either (a) referral to specialized services, if they exist, or (b) initiation of longer-term training and supervision of primary\/general health- care providers.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -140394,14 +140394,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.2 Psychosocial support and special care", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Multilayered supports: A layered system of complementary supports is most effective in meeting different needs: \\n\\n Basic services and security: Securing basic needs (food, shelter, water, basic health care) and ensuring a minimum level of security represent the first steps in mental and psychosocial well-being.", + "Sentence": "\n Multilayered supports: A layered system of complementary supports is most effective in meeting different needs: \n\n Basic services and security: Securing basic needs (food, shelter, water, basic health care) and ensuring a minimum level of security represent the first steps in mental and psychosocial well-being.", "newParagraph": "mental health psychosocial support intervention child ddr process shall abide following core principles9 n human right equality focus protection child risk human right violation promotion equity nondiscrimination maximizing fairness across subgroup child equality provision support includes taking consideration tailoring support specific different need boy girl n participation ensure participation child decision affecting support resilience promote participation family community important support structure child psychosocial health n harm minimize risk harm child psychosocial support employing good coordination family community actor appropriate need assessment cultural sensitivity ongoing monitoring reflection approach n build available resource capacity engage existing structure selfhelp mechanism root intervention local solution n integrated support system integrate wider system eg existing community support mechanism formalnonformal school system general health service general mental health service social service reach people communitybased approach limit stigma n multilayered support layered system complementary support effective meeting different need nn basic service security securing basic need food shelter water basic health care ensuring minimum level security represent first step mental psychosocial wellbeing nn community family support child require level familycommunity support address psychosocial disruption may include communal healing ceremony supportive parenting programme formal nonformal educational activity livelihood activity activation social network nn focused nonspecialized support moreaffected child require intervention trained supervised personnel area psychological first aid basic mental health care primary healthcare worker nn specialized service targeting affected child exhibit serious mental health psychosocial symptom require either referral specialized service exist b initiation longerterm training supervision primarygeneral health care provider", "ProcessedSent": "n multilayered support layered system complementary support effective meeting different need nn basic service security securing basic need food shelter water basic health care ensuring minimum level security represent first step mental psychosocial wellbeing", "SentID": 7799 }, { "ParagraphID": 2318, - "Paragraph": "Mental health and psychosocial support interventions for children in DDR processes shall abide by the following core principles:9 \\n Human rights and equality: Focus on the protection of children most at risk of human rights violations and the promotion of equity and non-discrimination, maximizing fairness across all sub-groups of children. Equality in provision of support includes taking into consideration and tailoring support to the specific, and different needs, of boys and girls. \\n Participation: Ensure the participation of children in decisions affecting them to support their resilience and promote the participation of families and communities, as they are the most important support structures for children\u2019s psychosocial health. \\n Do no harm: Minimize the risk of harm to children through psychosocial support by employing good coordination (with families, communities and other actors), appropriate needs assessments, cultural sensitivity, and ongoing monitoring and reflection on approach. \\n Build on available resources and capacities: Engage with existing structures and self-help mechanisms to root the intervention in local solutions. \\n Integrated support systems: Integrate into wider systems (e.g., existing community support mechanisms, formal\/non-formal school systems, general health services, general mental health services, social services) to reach more people (community-based approaches) and limit stigma. \\n Multilayered supports: A layered system of complementary supports is most effective in meeting different needs: \\n\\n Basic services and security: Securing basic needs (food, shelter, water, basic health care) and ensuring a minimum level of security represent the first steps in mental and psychosocial well-being. \\n\\n Community and family supports: Most children will require some level of family\/community support to address psychosocial disruption. This may include communal healing ceremonies, supportive parenting programmes, formal and non-formal educational activities, livelihood activities and the activation of social networks. \\n\\n Focused, non-specialized supports: More-affected children will require interventions by trained and supervised personnel in areas such as psychological first aid and basic mental health care by primary health-care workers. \\n\\n Specialized services: Targeting the most affected children who exhibit serious mental health and psychosocial symptoms and require either (a) referral to specialized services, if they exist, or (b) initiation of longer-term training and supervision of primary\/general health- care providers.", + "Paragraph": "Mental health and psychosocial support interventions for children in DDR processes shall abide by the following core principles:9 \n Human rights and equality: Focus on the protection of children most at risk of human rights violations and the promotion of equity and non-discrimination, maximizing fairness across all sub-groups of children. Equality in provision of support includes taking into consideration and tailoring support to the specific, and different needs, of boys and girls. \n Participation: Ensure the participation of children in decisions affecting them to support their resilience and promote the participation of families and communities, as they are the most important support structures for children\u2019s psychosocial health. \n Do no harm: Minimize the risk of harm to children through psychosocial support by employing good coordination (with families, communities and other actors), appropriate needs assessments, cultural sensitivity, and ongoing monitoring and reflection on approach. \n Build on available resources and capacities: Engage with existing structures and self-help mechanisms to root the intervention in local solutions. \n Integrated support systems: Integrate into wider systems (e.g., existing community support mechanisms, formal\/non-formal school systems, general health services, general mental health services, social services) to reach more people (community-based approaches) and limit stigma. \n Multilayered supports: A layered system of complementary supports is most effective in meeting different needs: \n\n Basic services and security: Securing basic needs (food, shelter, water, basic health care) and ensuring a minimum level of security represent the first steps in mental and psychosocial well-being. \n\n Community and family supports: Most children will require some level of family\/community support to address psychosocial disruption. This may include communal healing ceremonies, supportive parenting programmes, formal and non-formal educational activities, livelihood activities and the activation of social networks. \n\n Focused, non-specialized supports: More-affected children will require interventions by trained and supervised personnel in areas such as psychological first aid and basic mental health care by primary health-care workers. \n\n Specialized services: Targeting the most affected children who exhibit serious mental health and psychosocial symptoms and require either (a) referral to specialized services, if they exist, or (b) initiation of longer-term training and supervision of primary\/general health- care providers.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -140412,14 +140412,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.2 Psychosocial support and special care", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Community and family supports: Most children will require some level of family\/community support to address psychosocial disruption.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Community and family supports: Most children will require some level of family\/community support to address psychosocial disruption.", "newParagraph": "mental health psychosocial support intervention child ddr process shall abide following core principles9 n human right equality focus protection child risk human right violation promotion equity nondiscrimination maximizing fairness across subgroup child equality provision support includes taking consideration tailoring support specific different need boy girl n participation ensure participation child decision affecting support resilience promote participation family community important support structure child psychosocial health n harm minimize risk harm child psychosocial support employing good coordination family community actor appropriate need assessment cultural sensitivity ongoing monitoring reflection approach n build available resource capacity engage existing structure selfhelp mechanism root intervention local solution n integrated support system integrate wider system eg existing community support mechanism formalnonformal school system general health service general mental health service social service reach people communitybased approach limit stigma n multilayered support layered system complementary support effective meeting different need nn basic service security securing basic need food shelter water basic health care ensuring minimum level security represent first step mental psychosocial wellbeing nn community family support child require level familycommunity support address psychosocial disruption may include communal healing ceremony supportive parenting programme formal nonformal educational activity livelihood activity activation social network nn focused nonspecialized support moreaffected child require intervention trained supervised personnel area psychological first aid basic mental health care primary healthcare worker nn specialized service targeting affected child exhibit serious mental health psychosocial symptom require either referral specialized service exist b initiation longerterm training supervision primarygeneral health care provider", "ProcessedSent": "nn community family support child require level familycommunity support address psychosocial disruption", "SentID": 7800 }, { "ParagraphID": 2318, - "Paragraph": "Mental health and psychosocial support interventions for children in DDR processes shall abide by the following core principles:9 \\n Human rights and equality: Focus on the protection of children most at risk of human rights violations and the promotion of equity and non-discrimination, maximizing fairness across all sub-groups of children. Equality in provision of support includes taking into consideration and tailoring support to the specific, and different needs, of boys and girls. \\n Participation: Ensure the participation of children in decisions affecting them to support their resilience and promote the participation of families and communities, as they are the most important support structures for children\u2019s psychosocial health. \\n Do no harm: Minimize the risk of harm to children through psychosocial support by employing good coordination (with families, communities and other actors), appropriate needs assessments, cultural sensitivity, and ongoing monitoring and reflection on approach. \\n Build on available resources and capacities: Engage with existing structures and self-help mechanisms to root the intervention in local solutions. \\n Integrated support systems: Integrate into wider systems (e.g., existing community support mechanisms, formal\/non-formal school systems, general health services, general mental health services, social services) to reach more people (community-based approaches) and limit stigma. \\n Multilayered supports: A layered system of complementary supports is most effective in meeting different needs: \\n\\n Basic services and security: Securing basic needs (food, shelter, water, basic health care) and ensuring a minimum level of security represent the first steps in mental and psychosocial well-being. \\n\\n Community and family supports: Most children will require some level of family\/community support to address psychosocial disruption. This may include communal healing ceremonies, supportive parenting programmes, formal and non-formal educational activities, livelihood activities and the activation of social networks. \\n\\n Focused, non-specialized supports: More-affected children will require interventions by trained and supervised personnel in areas such as psychological first aid and basic mental health care by primary health-care workers. \\n\\n Specialized services: Targeting the most affected children who exhibit serious mental health and psychosocial symptoms and require either (a) referral to specialized services, if they exist, or (b) initiation of longer-term training and supervision of primary\/general health- care providers.", + "Paragraph": "Mental health and psychosocial support interventions for children in DDR processes shall abide by the following core principles:9 \n Human rights and equality: Focus on the protection of children most at risk of human rights violations and the promotion of equity and non-discrimination, maximizing fairness across all sub-groups of children. Equality in provision of support includes taking into consideration and tailoring support to the specific, and different needs, of boys and girls. \n Participation: Ensure the participation of children in decisions affecting them to support their resilience and promote the participation of families and communities, as they are the most important support structures for children\u2019s psychosocial health. \n Do no harm: Minimize the risk of harm to children through psychosocial support by employing good coordination (with families, communities and other actors), appropriate needs assessments, cultural sensitivity, and ongoing monitoring and reflection on approach. \n Build on available resources and capacities: Engage with existing structures and self-help mechanisms to root the intervention in local solutions. \n Integrated support systems: Integrate into wider systems (e.g., existing community support mechanisms, formal\/non-formal school systems, general health services, general mental health services, social services) to reach more people (community-based approaches) and limit stigma. \n Multilayered supports: A layered system of complementary supports is most effective in meeting different needs: \n\n Basic services and security: Securing basic needs (food, shelter, water, basic health care) and ensuring a minimum level of security represent the first steps in mental and psychosocial well-being. \n\n Community and family supports: Most children will require some level of family\/community support to address psychosocial disruption. This may include communal healing ceremonies, supportive parenting programmes, formal and non-formal educational activities, livelihood activities and the activation of social networks. \n\n Focused, non-specialized supports: More-affected children will require interventions by trained and supervised personnel in areas such as psychological first aid and basic mental health care by primary health-care workers. \n\n Specialized services: Targeting the most affected children who exhibit serious mental health and psychosocial symptoms and require either (a) referral to specialized services, if they exist, or (b) initiation of longer-term training and supervision of primary\/general health- care providers.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -140437,7 +140437,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2318, - "Paragraph": "Mental health and psychosocial support interventions for children in DDR processes shall abide by the following core principles:9 \\n Human rights and equality: Focus on the protection of children most at risk of human rights violations and the promotion of equity and non-discrimination, maximizing fairness across all sub-groups of children. Equality in provision of support includes taking into consideration and tailoring support to the specific, and different needs, of boys and girls. \\n Participation: Ensure the participation of children in decisions affecting them to support their resilience and promote the participation of families and communities, as they are the most important support structures for children\u2019s psychosocial health. \\n Do no harm: Minimize the risk of harm to children through psychosocial support by employing good coordination (with families, communities and other actors), appropriate needs assessments, cultural sensitivity, and ongoing monitoring and reflection on approach. \\n Build on available resources and capacities: Engage with existing structures and self-help mechanisms to root the intervention in local solutions. \\n Integrated support systems: Integrate into wider systems (e.g., existing community support mechanisms, formal\/non-formal school systems, general health services, general mental health services, social services) to reach more people (community-based approaches) and limit stigma. \\n Multilayered supports: A layered system of complementary supports is most effective in meeting different needs: \\n\\n Basic services and security: Securing basic needs (food, shelter, water, basic health care) and ensuring a minimum level of security represent the first steps in mental and psychosocial well-being. \\n\\n Community and family supports: Most children will require some level of family\/community support to address psychosocial disruption. This may include communal healing ceremonies, supportive parenting programmes, formal and non-formal educational activities, livelihood activities and the activation of social networks. \\n\\n Focused, non-specialized supports: More-affected children will require interventions by trained and supervised personnel in areas such as psychological first aid and basic mental health care by primary health-care workers. \\n\\n Specialized services: Targeting the most affected children who exhibit serious mental health and psychosocial symptoms and require either (a) referral to specialized services, if they exist, or (b) initiation of longer-term training and supervision of primary\/general health- care providers.", + "Paragraph": "Mental health and psychosocial support interventions for children in DDR processes shall abide by the following core principles:9 \n Human rights and equality: Focus on the protection of children most at risk of human rights violations and the promotion of equity and non-discrimination, maximizing fairness across all sub-groups of children. Equality in provision of support includes taking into consideration and tailoring support to the specific, and different needs, of boys and girls. \n Participation: Ensure the participation of children in decisions affecting them to support their resilience and promote the participation of families and communities, as they are the most important support structures for children\u2019s psychosocial health. \n Do no harm: Minimize the risk of harm to children through psychosocial support by employing good coordination (with families, communities and other actors), appropriate needs assessments, cultural sensitivity, and ongoing monitoring and reflection on approach. \n Build on available resources and capacities: Engage with existing structures and self-help mechanisms to root the intervention in local solutions. \n Integrated support systems: Integrate into wider systems (e.g., existing community support mechanisms, formal\/non-formal school systems, general health services, general mental health services, social services) to reach more people (community-based approaches) and limit stigma. \n Multilayered supports: A layered system of complementary supports is most effective in meeting different needs: \n\n Basic services and security: Securing basic needs (food, shelter, water, basic health care) and ensuring a minimum level of security represent the first steps in mental and psychosocial well-being. \n\n Community and family supports: Most children will require some level of family\/community support to address psychosocial disruption. This may include communal healing ceremonies, supportive parenting programmes, formal and non-formal educational activities, livelihood activities and the activation of social networks. \n\n Focused, non-specialized supports: More-affected children will require interventions by trained and supervised personnel in areas such as psychological first aid and basic mental health care by primary health-care workers. \n\n Specialized services: Targeting the most affected children who exhibit serious mental health and psychosocial symptoms and require either (a) referral to specialized services, if they exist, or (b) initiation of longer-term training and supervision of primary\/general health- care providers.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -140448,14 +140448,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.2 Psychosocial support and special care", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Focused, non-specialized supports: More-affected children will require interventions by trained and supervised personnel in areas such as psychological first aid and basic mental health care by primary health-care workers.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Focused, non-specialized supports: More-affected children will require interventions by trained and supervised personnel in areas such as psychological first aid and basic mental health care by primary health-care workers.", "newParagraph": "mental health psychosocial support intervention child ddr process shall abide following core principles9 n human right equality focus protection child risk human right violation promotion equity nondiscrimination maximizing fairness across subgroup child equality provision support includes taking consideration tailoring support specific different need boy girl n participation ensure participation child decision affecting support resilience promote participation family community important support structure child psychosocial health n harm minimize risk harm child psychosocial support employing good coordination family community actor appropriate need assessment cultural sensitivity ongoing monitoring reflection approach n build available resource capacity engage existing structure selfhelp mechanism root intervention local solution n integrated support system integrate wider system eg existing community support mechanism formalnonformal school system general health service general mental health service social service reach people communitybased approach limit stigma n multilayered support layered system complementary support effective meeting different need nn basic service security securing basic need food shelter water basic health care ensuring minimum level security represent first step mental psychosocial wellbeing nn community family support child require level familycommunity support address psychosocial disruption may include communal healing ceremony supportive parenting programme formal nonformal educational activity livelihood activity activation social network nn focused nonspecialized support moreaffected child require intervention trained supervised personnel area psychological first aid basic mental health care primary healthcare worker nn specialized service targeting affected child exhibit serious mental health psychosocial symptom require either referral specialized service exist b initiation longerterm training supervision primarygeneral health care provider", "ProcessedSent": "nn focused nonspecialized support moreaffected child require intervention trained supervised personnel area psychological first aid basic mental health care primary healthcare worker", "SentID": 7802 }, { "ParagraphID": 2318, - "Paragraph": "Mental health and psychosocial support interventions for children in DDR processes shall abide by the following core principles:9 \\n Human rights and equality: Focus on the protection of children most at risk of human rights violations and the promotion of equity and non-discrimination, maximizing fairness across all sub-groups of children. Equality in provision of support includes taking into consideration and tailoring support to the specific, and different needs, of boys and girls. \\n Participation: Ensure the participation of children in decisions affecting them to support their resilience and promote the participation of families and communities, as they are the most important support structures for children\u2019s psychosocial health. \\n Do no harm: Minimize the risk of harm to children through psychosocial support by employing good coordination (with families, communities and other actors), appropriate needs assessments, cultural sensitivity, and ongoing monitoring and reflection on approach. \\n Build on available resources and capacities: Engage with existing structures and self-help mechanisms to root the intervention in local solutions. \\n Integrated support systems: Integrate into wider systems (e.g., existing community support mechanisms, formal\/non-formal school systems, general health services, general mental health services, social services) to reach more people (community-based approaches) and limit stigma. \\n Multilayered supports: A layered system of complementary supports is most effective in meeting different needs: \\n\\n Basic services and security: Securing basic needs (food, shelter, water, basic health care) and ensuring a minimum level of security represent the first steps in mental and psychosocial well-being. \\n\\n Community and family supports: Most children will require some level of family\/community support to address psychosocial disruption. This may include communal healing ceremonies, supportive parenting programmes, formal and non-formal educational activities, livelihood activities and the activation of social networks. \\n\\n Focused, non-specialized supports: More-affected children will require interventions by trained and supervised personnel in areas such as psychological first aid and basic mental health care by primary health-care workers. \\n\\n Specialized services: Targeting the most affected children who exhibit serious mental health and psychosocial symptoms and require either (a) referral to specialized services, if they exist, or (b) initiation of longer-term training and supervision of primary\/general health- care providers.", + "Paragraph": "Mental health and psychosocial support interventions for children in DDR processes shall abide by the following core principles:9 \n Human rights and equality: Focus on the protection of children most at risk of human rights violations and the promotion of equity and non-discrimination, maximizing fairness across all sub-groups of children. Equality in provision of support includes taking into consideration and tailoring support to the specific, and different needs, of boys and girls. \n Participation: Ensure the participation of children in decisions affecting them to support their resilience and promote the participation of families and communities, as they are the most important support structures for children\u2019s psychosocial health. \n Do no harm: Minimize the risk of harm to children through psychosocial support by employing good coordination (with families, communities and other actors), appropriate needs assessments, cultural sensitivity, and ongoing monitoring and reflection on approach. \n Build on available resources and capacities: Engage with existing structures and self-help mechanisms to root the intervention in local solutions. \n Integrated support systems: Integrate into wider systems (e.g., existing community support mechanisms, formal\/non-formal school systems, general health services, general mental health services, social services) to reach more people (community-based approaches) and limit stigma. \n Multilayered supports: A layered system of complementary supports is most effective in meeting different needs: \n\n Basic services and security: Securing basic needs (food, shelter, water, basic health care) and ensuring a minimum level of security represent the first steps in mental and psychosocial well-being. \n\n Community and family supports: Most children will require some level of family\/community support to address psychosocial disruption. This may include communal healing ceremonies, supportive parenting programmes, formal and non-formal educational activities, livelihood activities and the activation of social networks. \n\n Focused, non-specialized supports: More-affected children will require interventions by trained and supervised personnel in areas such as psychological first aid and basic mental health care by primary health-care workers. \n\n Specialized services: Targeting the most affected children who exhibit serious mental health and psychosocial symptoms and require either (a) referral to specialized services, if they exist, or (b) initiation of longer-term training and supervision of primary\/general health- care providers.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -140466,7 +140466,7 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.2 Psychosocial support and special care", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Specialized services: Targeting the most affected children who exhibit serious mental health and psychosocial symptoms and require either (a) referral to specialized services, if they exist, or (b) initiation of longer-term training and supervision of primary\/general health- care providers.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Specialized services: Targeting the most affected children who exhibit serious mental health and psychosocial symptoms and require either (a) referral to specialized services, if they exist, or (b) initiation of longer-term training and supervision of primary\/general health- care providers.", "newParagraph": "mental health psychosocial support intervention child ddr process shall abide following core principles9 n human right equality focus protection child risk human right violation promotion equity nondiscrimination maximizing fairness across subgroup child equality provision support includes taking consideration tailoring support specific different need boy girl n participation ensure participation child decision affecting support resilience promote participation family community important support structure child psychosocial health n harm minimize risk harm child psychosocial support employing good coordination family community actor appropriate need assessment cultural sensitivity ongoing monitoring reflection approach n build available resource capacity engage existing structure selfhelp mechanism root intervention local solution n integrated support system integrate wider system eg existing community support mechanism formalnonformal school system general health service general mental health service social service reach people communitybased approach limit stigma n multilayered support layered system complementary support effective meeting different need nn basic service security securing basic need food shelter water basic health care ensuring minimum level security represent first step mental psychosocial wellbeing nn community family support child require level familycommunity support address psychosocial disruption may include communal healing ceremony supportive parenting programme formal nonformal educational activity livelihood activity activation social network nn focused nonspecialized support moreaffected child require intervention trained supervised personnel area psychological first aid basic mental health care primary healthcare worker nn specialized service targeting affected child exhibit serious mental health psychosocial symptom require either referral specialized service exist b initiation longerterm training supervision primarygeneral health care provider", "ProcessedSent": "nn specialized service targeting affected child exhibit serious mental health psychosocial symptom require either referral specialized service exist b initiation longerterm training supervision primarygeneral health care provider", "SentID": 7803 @@ -140977,7 +140977,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2327, - "Paragraph": "Assisting families in the creation of a supportive environment for returning CAAFAG can be achieved through a variety of means and should be considered in all DDR processes for children. This support may take a number of different forms: \\n Psychosocial support to the extended family can help to address broader psychosocial well-being concerns, overcome initial tensions and strengthen the resilience of the family as a whole. \\n Positive parenting programmes can increase awareness of the rights (and needs) of the child and help to develop parenting skills to better support returning CAAFAG (e.g., recognizing symptoms of trauma, parent-child communication, productively addressing negative behaviours in the child). \\n Promotion of parent-teacher associations (development or membership of) can provide ways for parents to support their children in school and highlight parents\u2019 needs (e.g., help with fees, uniforms, food). \\n Income-generating activities that involve or support the whole family rather than only the child can alleviate financial concerns and promote working together. \\n Establishment of community-based child protection networks involving parents can assist in the delivery of early warnings related to recruitment risk, children\u2019s engagement in risk-taking behaviours (e.g., drug or alcohol abuse, unsafe sex) or conflicts among children and youth in the community. \\n Support to associations of families of conflict-affected children beyond CAAFAG can help build awareness in the community of their specific needs, address stigma and provide support in a range of areas including health, income generation, community voice and participation.", + "Paragraph": "Assisting families in the creation of a supportive environment for returning CAAFAG can be achieved through a variety of means and should be considered in all DDR processes for children. This support may take a number of different forms: \n Psychosocial support to the extended family can help to address broader psychosocial well-being concerns, overcome initial tensions and strengthen the resilience of the family as a whole. \n Positive parenting programmes can increase awareness of the rights (and needs) of the child and help to develop parenting skills to better support returning CAAFAG (e.g., recognizing symptoms of trauma, parent-child communication, productively addressing negative behaviours in the child). \n Promotion of parent-teacher associations (development or membership of) can provide ways for parents to support their children in school and highlight parents\u2019 needs (e.g., help with fees, uniforms, food). \n Income-generating activities that involve or support the whole family rather than only the child can alleviate financial concerns and promote working together. \n Establishment of community-based child protection networks involving parents can assist in the delivery of early warnings related to recruitment risk, children\u2019s engagement in risk-taking behaviours (e.g., drug or alcohol abuse, unsafe sex) or conflicts among children and youth in the community. \n Support to associations of families of conflict-affected children beyond CAAFAG can help build awareness in the community of their specific needs, address stigma and provide support in a range of areas including health, income generation, community voice and participation.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -140995,7 +140995,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2327, - "Paragraph": "Assisting families in the creation of a supportive environment for returning CAAFAG can be achieved through a variety of means and should be considered in all DDR processes for children. This support may take a number of different forms: \\n Psychosocial support to the extended family can help to address broader psychosocial well-being concerns, overcome initial tensions and strengthen the resilience of the family as a whole. \\n Positive parenting programmes can increase awareness of the rights (and needs) of the child and help to develop parenting skills to better support returning CAAFAG (e.g., recognizing symptoms of trauma, parent-child communication, productively addressing negative behaviours in the child). \\n Promotion of parent-teacher associations (development or membership of) can provide ways for parents to support their children in school and highlight parents\u2019 needs (e.g., help with fees, uniforms, food). \\n Income-generating activities that involve or support the whole family rather than only the child can alleviate financial concerns and promote working together. \\n Establishment of community-based child protection networks involving parents can assist in the delivery of early warnings related to recruitment risk, children\u2019s engagement in risk-taking behaviours (e.g., drug or alcohol abuse, unsafe sex) or conflicts among children and youth in the community. \\n Support to associations of families of conflict-affected children beyond CAAFAG can help build awareness in the community of their specific needs, address stigma and provide support in a range of areas including health, income generation, community voice and participation.", + "Paragraph": "Assisting families in the creation of a supportive environment for returning CAAFAG can be achieved through a variety of means and should be considered in all DDR processes for children. This support may take a number of different forms: \n Psychosocial support to the extended family can help to address broader psychosocial well-being concerns, overcome initial tensions and strengthen the resilience of the family as a whole. \n Positive parenting programmes can increase awareness of the rights (and needs) of the child and help to develop parenting skills to better support returning CAAFAG (e.g., recognizing symptoms of trauma, parent-child communication, productively addressing negative behaviours in the child). \n Promotion of parent-teacher associations (development or membership of) can provide ways for parents to support their children in school and highlight parents\u2019 needs (e.g., help with fees, uniforms, food). \n Income-generating activities that involve or support the whole family rather than only the child can alleviate financial concerns and promote working together. \n Establishment of community-based child protection networks involving parents can assist in the delivery of early warnings related to recruitment risk, children\u2019s engagement in risk-taking behaviours (e.g., drug or alcohol abuse, unsafe sex) or conflicts among children and youth in the community. \n Support to associations of families of conflict-affected children beyond CAAFAG can help build awareness in the community of their specific needs, address stigma and provide support in a range of areas including health, income generation, community voice and participation.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -141006,14 +141006,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.4 Supporting families and communities", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This support may take a number of different forms: \\n Psychosocial support to the extended family can help to address broader psychosocial well-being concerns, overcome initial tensions and strengthen the resilience of the family as a whole.", + "Sentence": "This support may take a number of different forms: \n Psychosocial support to the extended family can help to address broader psychosocial well-being concerns, overcome initial tensions and strengthen the resilience of the family as a whole.", "newParagraph": "assisting family creation supportive environment returning caafag achieved variety mean considered ddr process child support may take number different form n psychosocial support extended family help address broader psychosocial wellbeing concern overcome initial tension strengthen resilience family whole n positive parenting programme increase awareness right need child help develop parenting skill better support returning caafag eg recognizing symptom trauma parentchild communication productively addressing negative behaviour child n promotion parentteacher association development membership provide way parent support child school highlight parent need eg help fee uniform food n incomegenerating activity involve support whole family rather child alleviate financial concern promote working together n establishment communitybased child protection network involving parent assist delivery early warning related recruitment risk child engagement risktaking behaviour eg drug alcohol abuse unsafe sex conflict among child youth community n support association family conflictaffected child beyond caafag help build awareness community specific need address stigma provide support range area including health income generation community voice participation", "ProcessedSent": "support may take number different form n psychosocial support extended family help address broader psychosocial wellbeing concern overcome initial tension strengthen resilience family whole", "SentID": 7833 }, { "ParagraphID": 2327, - "Paragraph": "Assisting families in the creation of a supportive environment for returning CAAFAG can be achieved through a variety of means and should be considered in all DDR processes for children. This support may take a number of different forms: \\n Psychosocial support to the extended family can help to address broader psychosocial well-being concerns, overcome initial tensions and strengthen the resilience of the family as a whole. \\n Positive parenting programmes can increase awareness of the rights (and needs) of the child and help to develop parenting skills to better support returning CAAFAG (e.g., recognizing symptoms of trauma, parent-child communication, productively addressing negative behaviours in the child). \\n Promotion of parent-teacher associations (development or membership of) can provide ways for parents to support their children in school and highlight parents\u2019 needs (e.g., help with fees, uniforms, food). \\n Income-generating activities that involve or support the whole family rather than only the child can alleviate financial concerns and promote working together. \\n Establishment of community-based child protection networks involving parents can assist in the delivery of early warnings related to recruitment risk, children\u2019s engagement in risk-taking behaviours (e.g., drug or alcohol abuse, unsafe sex) or conflicts among children and youth in the community. \\n Support to associations of families of conflict-affected children beyond CAAFAG can help build awareness in the community of their specific needs, address stigma and provide support in a range of areas including health, income generation, community voice and participation.", + "Paragraph": "Assisting families in the creation of a supportive environment for returning CAAFAG can be achieved through a variety of means and should be considered in all DDR processes for children. This support may take a number of different forms: \n Psychosocial support to the extended family can help to address broader psychosocial well-being concerns, overcome initial tensions and strengthen the resilience of the family as a whole. \n Positive parenting programmes can increase awareness of the rights (and needs) of the child and help to develop parenting skills to better support returning CAAFAG (e.g., recognizing symptoms of trauma, parent-child communication, productively addressing negative behaviours in the child). \n Promotion of parent-teacher associations (development or membership of) can provide ways for parents to support their children in school and highlight parents\u2019 needs (e.g., help with fees, uniforms, food). \n Income-generating activities that involve or support the whole family rather than only the child can alleviate financial concerns and promote working together. \n Establishment of community-based child protection networks involving parents can assist in the delivery of early warnings related to recruitment risk, children\u2019s engagement in risk-taking behaviours (e.g., drug or alcohol abuse, unsafe sex) or conflicts among children and youth in the community. \n Support to associations of families of conflict-affected children beyond CAAFAG can help build awareness in the community of their specific needs, address stigma and provide support in a range of areas including health, income generation, community voice and participation.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -141024,14 +141024,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.4 Supporting families and communities", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Positive parenting programmes can increase awareness of the rights (and needs) of the child and help to develop parenting skills to better support returning CAAFAG (e.g., recognizing symptoms of trauma, parent-child communication, productively addressing negative behaviours in the child).", + "Sentence": "\n Positive parenting programmes can increase awareness of the rights (and needs) of the child and help to develop parenting skills to better support returning CAAFAG (e.g., recognizing symptoms of trauma, parent-child communication, productively addressing negative behaviours in the child).", "newParagraph": "assisting family creation supportive environment returning caafag achieved variety mean considered ddr process child support may take number different form n psychosocial support extended family help address broader psychosocial wellbeing concern overcome initial tension strengthen resilience family whole n positive parenting programme increase awareness right need child help develop parenting skill better support returning caafag eg recognizing symptom trauma parentchild communication productively addressing negative behaviour child n promotion parentteacher association development membership provide way parent support child school highlight parent need eg help fee uniform food n incomegenerating activity involve support whole family rather child alleviate financial concern promote working together n establishment communitybased child protection network involving parent assist delivery early warning related recruitment risk child engagement risktaking behaviour eg drug alcohol abuse unsafe sex conflict among child youth community n support association family conflictaffected child beyond caafag help build awareness community specific need address stigma provide support range area including health income generation community voice participation", "ProcessedSent": "n positive parenting programme increase awareness right need child help develop parenting skill better support returning caafag eg recognizing symptom trauma parentchild communication productively addressing negative behaviour child", "SentID": 7834 }, { "ParagraphID": 2327, - "Paragraph": "Assisting families in the creation of a supportive environment for returning CAAFAG can be achieved through a variety of means and should be considered in all DDR processes for children. This support may take a number of different forms: \\n Psychosocial support to the extended family can help to address broader psychosocial well-being concerns, overcome initial tensions and strengthen the resilience of the family as a whole. \\n Positive parenting programmes can increase awareness of the rights (and needs) of the child and help to develop parenting skills to better support returning CAAFAG (e.g., recognizing symptoms of trauma, parent-child communication, productively addressing negative behaviours in the child). \\n Promotion of parent-teacher associations (development or membership of) can provide ways for parents to support their children in school and highlight parents\u2019 needs (e.g., help with fees, uniforms, food). \\n Income-generating activities that involve or support the whole family rather than only the child can alleviate financial concerns and promote working together. \\n Establishment of community-based child protection networks involving parents can assist in the delivery of early warnings related to recruitment risk, children\u2019s engagement in risk-taking behaviours (e.g., drug or alcohol abuse, unsafe sex) or conflicts among children and youth in the community. \\n Support to associations of families of conflict-affected children beyond CAAFAG can help build awareness in the community of their specific needs, address stigma and provide support in a range of areas including health, income generation, community voice and participation.", + "Paragraph": "Assisting families in the creation of a supportive environment for returning CAAFAG can be achieved through a variety of means and should be considered in all DDR processes for children. This support may take a number of different forms: \n Psychosocial support to the extended family can help to address broader psychosocial well-being concerns, overcome initial tensions and strengthen the resilience of the family as a whole. \n Positive parenting programmes can increase awareness of the rights (and needs) of the child and help to develop parenting skills to better support returning CAAFAG (e.g., recognizing symptoms of trauma, parent-child communication, productively addressing negative behaviours in the child). \n Promotion of parent-teacher associations (development or membership of) can provide ways for parents to support their children in school and highlight parents\u2019 needs (e.g., help with fees, uniforms, food). \n Income-generating activities that involve or support the whole family rather than only the child can alleviate financial concerns and promote working together. \n Establishment of community-based child protection networks involving parents can assist in the delivery of early warnings related to recruitment risk, children\u2019s engagement in risk-taking behaviours (e.g., drug or alcohol abuse, unsafe sex) or conflicts among children and youth in the community. \n Support to associations of families of conflict-affected children beyond CAAFAG can help build awareness in the community of their specific needs, address stigma and provide support in a range of areas including health, income generation, community voice and participation.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -141042,14 +141042,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.4 Supporting families and communities", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Promotion of parent-teacher associations (development or membership of) can provide ways for parents to support their children in school and highlight parents\u2019 needs (e.g., help with fees, uniforms, food).", + "Sentence": "\n Promotion of parent-teacher associations (development or membership of) can provide ways for parents to support their children in school and highlight parents\u2019 needs (e.g., help with fees, uniforms, food).", "newParagraph": "assisting family creation supportive environment returning caafag achieved variety mean considered ddr process child support may take number different form n psychosocial support extended family help address broader psychosocial wellbeing concern overcome initial tension strengthen resilience family whole n positive parenting programme increase awareness right need child help develop parenting skill better support returning caafag eg recognizing symptom trauma parentchild communication productively addressing negative behaviour child n promotion parentteacher association development membership provide way parent support child school highlight parent need eg help fee uniform food n incomegenerating activity involve support whole family rather child alleviate financial concern promote working together n establishment communitybased child protection network involving parent assist delivery early warning related recruitment risk child engagement risktaking behaviour eg drug alcohol abuse unsafe sex conflict among child youth community n support association family conflictaffected child beyond caafag help build awareness community specific need address stigma provide support range area including health income generation community voice participation", "ProcessedSent": "n promotion parentteacher association development membership provide way parent support child school highlight parent need eg help fee uniform food", "SentID": 7835 }, { "ParagraphID": 2327, - "Paragraph": "Assisting families in the creation of a supportive environment for returning CAAFAG can be achieved through a variety of means and should be considered in all DDR processes for children. This support may take a number of different forms: \\n Psychosocial support to the extended family can help to address broader psychosocial well-being concerns, overcome initial tensions and strengthen the resilience of the family as a whole. \\n Positive parenting programmes can increase awareness of the rights (and needs) of the child and help to develop parenting skills to better support returning CAAFAG (e.g., recognizing symptoms of trauma, parent-child communication, productively addressing negative behaviours in the child). \\n Promotion of parent-teacher associations (development or membership of) can provide ways for parents to support their children in school and highlight parents\u2019 needs (e.g., help with fees, uniforms, food). \\n Income-generating activities that involve or support the whole family rather than only the child can alleviate financial concerns and promote working together. \\n Establishment of community-based child protection networks involving parents can assist in the delivery of early warnings related to recruitment risk, children\u2019s engagement in risk-taking behaviours (e.g., drug or alcohol abuse, unsafe sex) or conflicts among children and youth in the community. \\n Support to associations of families of conflict-affected children beyond CAAFAG can help build awareness in the community of their specific needs, address stigma and provide support in a range of areas including health, income generation, community voice and participation.", + "Paragraph": "Assisting families in the creation of a supportive environment for returning CAAFAG can be achieved through a variety of means and should be considered in all DDR processes for children. This support may take a number of different forms: \n Psychosocial support to the extended family can help to address broader psychosocial well-being concerns, overcome initial tensions and strengthen the resilience of the family as a whole. \n Positive parenting programmes can increase awareness of the rights (and needs) of the child and help to develop parenting skills to better support returning CAAFAG (e.g., recognizing symptoms of trauma, parent-child communication, productively addressing negative behaviours in the child). \n Promotion of parent-teacher associations (development or membership of) can provide ways for parents to support their children in school and highlight parents\u2019 needs (e.g., help with fees, uniforms, food). \n Income-generating activities that involve or support the whole family rather than only the child can alleviate financial concerns and promote working together. \n Establishment of community-based child protection networks involving parents can assist in the delivery of early warnings related to recruitment risk, children\u2019s engagement in risk-taking behaviours (e.g., drug or alcohol abuse, unsafe sex) or conflicts among children and youth in the community. \n Support to associations of families of conflict-affected children beyond CAAFAG can help build awareness in the community of their specific needs, address stigma and provide support in a range of areas including health, income generation, community voice and participation.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -141060,14 +141060,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.4 Supporting families and communities", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Income-generating activities that involve or support the whole family rather than only the child can alleviate financial concerns and promote working together.", + "Sentence": "\n Income-generating activities that involve or support the whole family rather than only the child can alleviate financial concerns and promote working together.", "newParagraph": "assisting family creation supportive environment returning caafag achieved variety mean considered ddr process child support may take number different form n psychosocial support extended family help address broader psychosocial wellbeing concern overcome initial tension strengthen resilience family whole n positive parenting programme increase awareness right need child help develop parenting skill better support returning caafag eg recognizing symptom trauma parentchild communication productively addressing negative behaviour child n promotion parentteacher association development membership provide way parent support child school highlight parent need eg help fee uniform food n incomegenerating activity involve support whole family rather child alleviate financial concern promote working together n establishment communitybased child protection network involving parent assist delivery early warning related recruitment risk child engagement risktaking behaviour eg drug alcohol abuse unsafe sex conflict among child youth community n support association family conflictaffected child beyond caafag help build awareness community specific need address stigma provide support range area including health income generation community voice participation", "ProcessedSent": "n incomegenerating activity involve support whole family rather child alleviate financial concern promote working together", "SentID": 7836 }, { "ParagraphID": 2327, - "Paragraph": "Assisting families in the creation of a supportive environment for returning CAAFAG can be achieved through a variety of means and should be considered in all DDR processes for children. This support may take a number of different forms: \\n Psychosocial support to the extended family can help to address broader psychosocial well-being concerns, overcome initial tensions and strengthen the resilience of the family as a whole. \\n Positive parenting programmes can increase awareness of the rights (and needs) of the child and help to develop parenting skills to better support returning CAAFAG (e.g., recognizing symptoms of trauma, parent-child communication, productively addressing negative behaviours in the child). \\n Promotion of parent-teacher associations (development or membership of) can provide ways for parents to support their children in school and highlight parents\u2019 needs (e.g., help with fees, uniforms, food). \\n Income-generating activities that involve or support the whole family rather than only the child can alleviate financial concerns and promote working together. \\n Establishment of community-based child protection networks involving parents can assist in the delivery of early warnings related to recruitment risk, children\u2019s engagement in risk-taking behaviours (e.g., drug or alcohol abuse, unsafe sex) or conflicts among children and youth in the community. \\n Support to associations of families of conflict-affected children beyond CAAFAG can help build awareness in the community of their specific needs, address stigma and provide support in a range of areas including health, income generation, community voice and participation.", + "Paragraph": "Assisting families in the creation of a supportive environment for returning CAAFAG can be achieved through a variety of means and should be considered in all DDR processes for children. This support may take a number of different forms: \n Psychosocial support to the extended family can help to address broader psychosocial well-being concerns, overcome initial tensions and strengthen the resilience of the family as a whole. \n Positive parenting programmes can increase awareness of the rights (and needs) of the child and help to develop parenting skills to better support returning CAAFAG (e.g., recognizing symptoms of trauma, parent-child communication, productively addressing negative behaviours in the child). \n Promotion of parent-teacher associations (development or membership of) can provide ways for parents to support their children in school and highlight parents\u2019 needs (e.g., help with fees, uniforms, food). \n Income-generating activities that involve or support the whole family rather than only the child can alleviate financial concerns and promote working together. \n Establishment of community-based child protection networks involving parents can assist in the delivery of early warnings related to recruitment risk, children\u2019s engagement in risk-taking behaviours (e.g., drug or alcohol abuse, unsafe sex) or conflicts among children and youth in the community. \n Support to associations of families of conflict-affected children beyond CAAFAG can help build awareness in the community of their specific needs, address stigma and provide support in a range of areas including health, income generation, community voice and participation.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -141078,14 +141078,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.4 Supporting families and communities", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Establishment of community-based child protection networks involving parents can assist in the delivery of early warnings related to recruitment risk, children\u2019s engagement in risk-taking behaviours (e.g., drug or alcohol abuse, unsafe sex) or conflicts among children and youth in the community.", + "Sentence": "\n Establishment of community-based child protection networks involving parents can assist in the delivery of early warnings related to recruitment risk, children\u2019s engagement in risk-taking behaviours (e.g., drug or alcohol abuse, unsafe sex) or conflicts among children and youth in the community.", "newParagraph": "assisting family creation supportive environment returning caafag achieved variety mean considered ddr process child support may take number different form n psychosocial support extended family help address broader psychosocial wellbeing concern overcome initial tension strengthen resilience family whole n positive parenting programme increase awareness right need child help develop parenting skill better support returning caafag eg recognizing symptom trauma parentchild communication productively addressing negative behaviour child n promotion parentteacher association development membership provide way parent support child school highlight parent need eg help fee uniform food n incomegenerating activity involve support whole family rather child alleviate financial concern promote working together n establishment communitybased child protection network involving parent assist delivery early warning related recruitment risk child engagement risktaking behaviour eg drug alcohol abuse unsafe sex conflict among child youth community n support association family conflictaffected child beyond caafag help build awareness community specific need address stigma provide support range area including health income generation community voice participation", "ProcessedSent": "n establishment communitybased child protection network involving parent assist delivery early warning related recruitment risk child engagement risktaking behaviour eg drug alcohol abuse unsafe sex conflict among child youth community", "SentID": 7837 }, { "ParagraphID": 2327, - "Paragraph": "Assisting families in the creation of a supportive environment for returning CAAFAG can be achieved through a variety of means and should be considered in all DDR processes for children. This support may take a number of different forms: \\n Psychosocial support to the extended family can help to address broader psychosocial well-being concerns, overcome initial tensions and strengthen the resilience of the family as a whole. \\n Positive parenting programmes can increase awareness of the rights (and needs) of the child and help to develop parenting skills to better support returning CAAFAG (e.g., recognizing symptoms of trauma, parent-child communication, productively addressing negative behaviours in the child). \\n Promotion of parent-teacher associations (development or membership of) can provide ways for parents to support their children in school and highlight parents\u2019 needs (e.g., help with fees, uniforms, food). \\n Income-generating activities that involve or support the whole family rather than only the child can alleviate financial concerns and promote working together. \\n Establishment of community-based child protection networks involving parents can assist in the delivery of early warnings related to recruitment risk, children\u2019s engagement in risk-taking behaviours (e.g., drug or alcohol abuse, unsafe sex) or conflicts among children and youth in the community. \\n Support to associations of families of conflict-affected children beyond CAAFAG can help build awareness in the community of their specific needs, address stigma and provide support in a range of areas including health, income generation, community voice and participation.", + "Paragraph": "Assisting families in the creation of a supportive environment for returning CAAFAG can be achieved through a variety of means and should be considered in all DDR processes for children. This support may take a number of different forms: \n Psychosocial support to the extended family can help to address broader psychosocial well-being concerns, overcome initial tensions and strengthen the resilience of the family as a whole. \n Positive parenting programmes can increase awareness of the rights (and needs) of the child and help to develop parenting skills to better support returning CAAFAG (e.g., recognizing symptoms of trauma, parent-child communication, productively addressing negative behaviours in the child). \n Promotion of parent-teacher associations (development or membership of) can provide ways for parents to support their children in school and highlight parents\u2019 needs (e.g., help with fees, uniforms, food). \n Income-generating activities that involve or support the whole family rather than only the child can alleviate financial concerns and promote working together. \n Establishment of community-based child protection networks involving parents can assist in the delivery of early warnings related to recruitment risk, children\u2019s engagement in risk-taking behaviours (e.g., drug or alcohol abuse, unsafe sex) or conflicts among children and youth in the community. \n Support to associations of families of conflict-affected children beyond CAAFAG can help build awareness in the community of their specific needs, address stigma and provide support in a range of areas including health, income generation, community voice and participation.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -141096,7 +141096,7 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.4 Supporting families and communities", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Support to associations of families of conflict-affected children beyond CAAFAG can help build awareness in the community of their specific needs, address stigma and provide support in a range of areas including health, income generation, community voice and participation.", + "Sentence": "\n Support to associations of families of conflict-affected children beyond CAAFAG can help build awareness in the community of their specific needs, address stigma and provide support in a range of areas including health, income generation, community voice and participation.", "newParagraph": "assisting family creation supportive environment returning caafag achieved variety mean considered ddr process child support may take number different form n psychosocial support extended family help address broader psychosocial wellbeing concern overcome initial tension strengthen resilience family whole n positive parenting programme increase awareness right need child help develop parenting skill better support returning caafag eg recognizing symptom trauma parentchild communication productively addressing negative behaviour child n promotion parentteacher association development membership provide way parent support child school highlight parent need eg help fee uniform food n incomegenerating activity involve support whole family rather child alleviate financial concern promote working together n establishment communitybased child protection network involving parent assist delivery early warning related recruitment risk child engagement risktaking behaviour eg drug alcohol abuse unsafe sex conflict among child youth community n support association family conflictaffected child beyond caafag help build awareness community specific need address stigma provide support range area including health income generation community voice participation", "ProcessedSent": "n support association family conflictaffected child beyond caafag help build awareness community specific need address stigma provide support range area including health income generation community voice participation", "SentID": 7838 @@ -141427,7 +141427,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2334, - "Paragraph": "Specific engagement with communities to aid the reintegration of CAAFAG may include: \\n Community sensitization and awareness-raising to educate communities on the rights of the child, the challenges CAAFAG face in their reintegration and the role that the community plays in this process; \\n Community-based psychosocial support addressing the needs of conflict-affected community members as well as CAAFAG and their families; \\n Community-wide parenting programmes that include the parents of CAAFAG and non-CAAFAG and help improve awareness and foster social inclusion and cohesion; \\n Support to community-based child protection structures that benefits the whole community, including those that reduce the risk of recruitment; \\n Investment in child-focused infrastructure rehabilitation (e.g., schools, health centres, child\/youth centres) that provide benefit to all children in the community; \\n Community-wide income-generation and employment programmes that bring older children as well as the parents of CAAFAG and non-CAAFAG together and provide much-needed livelihood opportunities; \\n Creation of community child committees that bring together community leaders, parents and child representatives (selected from children in the community, including CAAFAG and non- CAAFAG) to provide children with a platform to ensure their voice and participation, especially in the reconstruction process, is guaranteed; and \\n Advocacy support (including training, resources and\/or linkages) to increase the role and voice of communities and children\/youth in the development\/revision of national child and youth policies, as well as interventions.", + "Paragraph": "Specific engagement with communities to aid the reintegration of CAAFAG may include: \n Community sensitization and awareness-raising to educate communities on the rights of the child, the challenges CAAFAG face in their reintegration and the role that the community plays in this process; \n Community-based psychosocial support addressing the needs of conflict-affected community members as well as CAAFAG and their families; \n Community-wide parenting programmes that include the parents of CAAFAG and non-CAAFAG and help improve awareness and foster social inclusion and cohesion; \n Support to community-based child protection structures that benefits the whole community, including those that reduce the risk of recruitment; \n Investment in child-focused infrastructure rehabilitation (e.g., schools, health centres, child\/youth centres) that provide benefit to all children in the community; \n Community-wide income-generation and employment programmes that bring older children as well as the parents of CAAFAG and non-CAAFAG together and provide much-needed livelihood opportunities; \n Creation of community child committees that bring together community leaders, parents and child representatives (selected from children in the community, including CAAFAG and non- CAAFAG) to provide children with a platform to ensure their voice and participation, especially in the reconstruction process, is guaranteed; and \n Advocacy support (including training, resources and\/or linkages) to increase the role and voice of communities and children\/youth in the development\/revision of national child and youth policies, as well as interventions.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -141438,7 +141438,7 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.4 Supporting families and communities", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Specific engagement with communities to aid the reintegration of CAAFAG may include: \\n Community sensitization and awareness-raising to educate communities on the rights of the child, the challenges CAAFAG face in their reintegration and the role that the community plays in this process; \\n Community-based psychosocial support addressing the needs of conflict-affected community members as well as CAAFAG and their families; \\n Community-wide parenting programmes that include the parents of CAAFAG and non-CAAFAG and help improve awareness and foster social inclusion and cohesion; \\n Support to community-based child protection structures that benefits the whole community, including those that reduce the risk of recruitment; \\n Investment in child-focused infrastructure rehabilitation (e.g., schools, health centres, child\/youth centres) that provide benefit to all children in the community; \\n Community-wide income-generation and employment programmes that bring older children as well as the parents of CAAFAG and non-CAAFAG together and provide much-needed livelihood opportunities; \\n Creation of community child committees that bring together community leaders, parents and child representatives (selected from children in the community, including CAAFAG and non- CAAFAG) to provide children with a platform to ensure their voice and participation, especially in the reconstruction process, is guaranteed; and \\n Advocacy support (including training, resources and\/or linkages) to increase the role and voice of communities and children\/youth in the development\/revision of national child and youth policies, as well as interventions.", + "Sentence": "Specific engagement with communities to aid the reintegration of CAAFAG may include: \n Community sensitization and awareness-raising to educate communities on the rights of the child, the challenges CAAFAG face in their reintegration and the role that the community plays in this process; \n Community-based psychosocial support addressing the needs of conflict-affected community members as well as CAAFAG and their families; \n Community-wide parenting programmes that include the parents of CAAFAG and non-CAAFAG and help improve awareness and foster social inclusion and cohesion; \n Support to community-based child protection structures that benefits the whole community, including those that reduce the risk of recruitment; \n Investment in child-focused infrastructure rehabilitation (e.g., schools, health centres, child\/youth centres) that provide benefit to all children in the community; \n Community-wide income-generation and employment programmes that bring older children as well as the parents of CAAFAG and non-CAAFAG together and provide much-needed livelihood opportunities; \n Creation of community child committees that bring together community leaders, parents and child representatives (selected from children in the community, including CAAFAG and non- CAAFAG) to provide children with a platform to ensure their voice and participation, especially in the reconstruction process, is guaranteed; and \n Advocacy support (including training, resources and\/or linkages) to increase the role and voice of communities and children\/youth in the development\/revision of national child and youth policies, as well as interventions.", "newParagraph": "specific engagement community aid reintegration caafag may include n community sensitization awarenessraising educate community right child challenge caafag face reintegration role community play process n communitybased psychosocial support addressing need conflictaffected community member well caafag family n communitywide parenting programme include parent caafag noncaafag help improve awareness foster social inclusion cohesion n support communitybased child protection structure benefit whole community including reduce risk recruitment n investment childfocused infrastructure rehabilitation eg school health centre childyouth centre provide benefit child community n communitywide incomegeneration employment programme bring older child well parent caafag noncaafag together provide muchneeded livelihood opportunity n creation community child committee bring together community leader parent child representative selected child community including caafag non caafag provide child platform ensure voice participation especially reconstruction process guaranteed n advocacy support including training resource andor linkage increase role voice community childrenyouth developmentrevision national child youth policy well intervention", "ProcessedSent": "specific engagement community aid reintegration caafag may include n community sensitization awarenessraising educate community right child challenge caafag face reintegration role community play process n communitybased psychosocial support addressing need conflictaffected community member well caafag family n communitywide parenting programme include parent caafag noncaafag help improve awareness foster social inclusion cohesion n support communitybased child protection structure benefit whole community including reduce risk recruitment n investment childfocused infrastructure rehabilitation eg school health centre childyouth centre provide benefit child community n communitywide incomegeneration employment programme bring older child well parent caafag noncaafag together provide muchneeded livelihood opportunity n creation community child committee bring together community leader parent child representative selected child community including caafag non caafag provide child platform ensure voice participation especially reconstruction process guaranteed n advocacy support including training resource andor linkage increase role voice community childrenyouth developmentrevision national child youth policy well intervention", "SentID": 7857 @@ -141787,7 +141787,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2341, - "Paragraph": "Life skills are those abilities that help to promote psychological well-being and competence in children as they face the realities of life. These are the ten core life skill strategies and techniques: \\n problem-solving; \\n critical thinking; \\n effective communication skills; \\n agency and decision-making; \\n creative thinking; \\n interpersonal relationship skills; \\n self-awareness building skills; \\n empathy; \\n coping with stress; and \\n emotions.", + "Paragraph": "Life skills are those abilities that help to promote psychological well-being and competence in children as they face the realities of life. These are the ten core life skill strategies and techniques: \n problem-solving; \n critical thinking; \n effective communication skills; \n agency and decision-making; \n creative thinking; \n interpersonal relationship skills; \n self-awareness building skills; \n empathy; \n coping with stress; and \n emotions.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -141805,7 +141805,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2341, - "Paragraph": "Life skills are those abilities that help to promote psychological well-being and competence in children as they face the realities of life. These are the ten core life skill strategies and techniques: \\n problem-solving; \\n critical thinking; \\n effective communication skills; \\n agency and decision-making; \\n creative thinking; \\n interpersonal relationship skills; \\n self-awareness building skills; \\n empathy; \\n coping with stress; and \\n emotions.", + "Paragraph": "Life skills are those abilities that help to promote psychological well-being and competence in children as they face the realities of life. These are the ten core life skill strategies and techniques: \n problem-solving; \n critical thinking; \n effective communication skills; \n agency and decision-making; \n creative thinking; \n interpersonal relationship skills; \n self-awareness building skills; \n empathy; \n coping with stress; and \n emotions.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -141816,7 +141816,7 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.6 Life skills", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "These are the ten core life skill strategies and techniques: \\n problem-solving; \\n critical thinking; \\n effective communication skills; \\n agency and decision-making; \\n creative thinking; \\n interpersonal relationship skills; \\n self-awareness building skills; \\n empathy; \\n coping with stress; and \\n emotions.", + "Sentence": "These are the ten core life skill strategies and techniques: \n problem-solving; \n critical thinking; \n effective communication skills; \n agency and decision-making; \n creative thinking; \n interpersonal relationship skills; \n self-awareness building skills; \n empathy; \n coping with stress; and \n emotions.", "newParagraph": "life skill ability help promote psychological wellbeing competence child face reality life ten core life skill strategy technique n problemsolving n critical thinking n effective communication skill n agency decisionmaking n creative thinking n interpersonal relationship skill n selfawareness building skill n empathy n coping stress n emotion", "ProcessedSent": "ten core life skill strategy technique n problemsolving n critical thinking n effective communication skill n agency decisionmaking n creative thinking n interpersonal relationship skill n selfawareness building skill n empathy n coping stress n emotion", "SentID": 7878 @@ -141931,7 +141931,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2343, - "Paragraph": "Vocational training opportunities for children shall be realistic in terms of what the local economy can support and shall also reflect the wishes of the child. There should be made available as wide a range of training options as possible, consistent with local market conditions, to help children adapt successfully to civilian life and to what the market demands. This training may build on skills and competencies learned when the child was associated with an armed force or group. A choice of training options beyond traditional areas should be promoted, as should the provision of support to girls (including financial and childcare support, where appropriate). More specifically, vocational and skills training may include: \\n Analysis of livelihood systems, agriculture, market opportunities, and household economies to develop economically relevant training, alternative forms of education and opportunities for economic reintegration. \\n Coordination between stakeholders to improve lessons learned, development of joint programmes, appropriate referrals and measures to avoid inconsistencies in the benefits provided. \\n Community consultation to develop collective initiatives benefiting the community. Business skills training to prepare children to keep accounts and handle money. \\n Apprenticeships and on-the-job training for those with no previous work experience. \\n Life skills training, including basic social norms and civic education, parenting skills, rights at work and home, prevention of HIV\/AIDS, and education to counter interpersonal violence. \\n Incorporation of gender-transformative approaches to ensure sensitivity to the particular challenges faced by girls, increase awareness in both girls and boys of the challenges faced by the other gender, and foster positive gender relationships. \\n Development of skills in non-violent conflict resolution and anger management to help CAAFAG in their everyday lives. \\n Provision of childcare and, if necessary, flexible training schedules for girl mothers.", + "Paragraph": "Vocational training opportunities for children shall be realistic in terms of what the local economy can support and shall also reflect the wishes of the child. There should be made available as wide a range of training options as possible, consistent with local market conditions, to help children adapt successfully to civilian life and to what the market demands. This training may build on skills and competencies learned when the child was associated with an armed force or group. A choice of training options beyond traditional areas should be promoted, as should the provision of support to girls (including financial and childcare support, where appropriate). More specifically, vocational and skills training may include: \n Analysis of livelihood systems, agriculture, market opportunities, and household economies to develop economically relevant training, alternative forms of education and opportunities for economic reintegration. \n Coordination between stakeholders to improve lessons learned, development of joint programmes, appropriate referrals and measures to avoid inconsistencies in the benefits provided. \n Community consultation to develop collective initiatives benefiting the community. Business skills training to prepare children to keep accounts and handle money. \n Apprenticeships and on-the-job training for those with no previous work experience. \n Life skills training, including basic social norms and civic education, parenting skills, rights at work and home, prevention of HIV\/AIDS, and education to counter interpersonal violence. \n Incorporation of gender-transformative approaches to ensure sensitivity to the particular challenges faced by girls, increase awareness in both girls and boys of the challenges faced by the other gender, and foster positive gender relationships. \n Development of skills in non-violent conflict resolution and anger management to help CAAFAG in their everyday lives. \n Provision of childcare and, if necessary, flexible training schedules for girl mothers.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -141949,7 +141949,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2343, - "Paragraph": "Vocational training opportunities for children shall be realistic in terms of what the local economy can support and shall also reflect the wishes of the child. There should be made available as wide a range of training options as possible, consistent with local market conditions, to help children adapt successfully to civilian life and to what the market demands. This training may build on skills and competencies learned when the child was associated with an armed force or group. A choice of training options beyond traditional areas should be promoted, as should the provision of support to girls (including financial and childcare support, where appropriate). More specifically, vocational and skills training may include: \\n Analysis of livelihood systems, agriculture, market opportunities, and household economies to develop economically relevant training, alternative forms of education and opportunities for economic reintegration. \\n Coordination between stakeholders to improve lessons learned, development of joint programmes, appropriate referrals and measures to avoid inconsistencies in the benefits provided. \\n Community consultation to develop collective initiatives benefiting the community. Business skills training to prepare children to keep accounts and handle money. \\n Apprenticeships and on-the-job training for those with no previous work experience. \\n Life skills training, including basic social norms and civic education, parenting skills, rights at work and home, prevention of HIV\/AIDS, and education to counter interpersonal violence. \\n Incorporation of gender-transformative approaches to ensure sensitivity to the particular challenges faced by girls, increase awareness in both girls and boys of the challenges faced by the other gender, and foster positive gender relationships. \\n Development of skills in non-violent conflict resolution and anger management to help CAAFAG in their everyday lives. \\n Provision of childcare and, if necessary, flexible training schedules for girl mothers.", + "Paragraph": "Vocational training opportunities for children shall be realistic in terms of what the local economy can support and shall also reflect the wishes of the child. There should be made available as wide a range of training options as possible, consistent with local market conditions, to help children adapt successfully to civilian life and to what the market demands. This training may build on skills and competencies learned when the child was associated with an armed force or group. A choice of training options beyond traditional areas should be promoted, as should the provision of support to girls (including financial and childcare support, where appropriate). More specifically, vocational and skills training may include: \n Analysis of livelihood systems, agriculture, market opportunities, and household economies to develop economically relevant training, alternative forms of education and opportunities for economic reintegration. \n Coordination between stakeholders to improve lessons learned, development of joint programmes, appropriate referrals and measures to avoid inconsistencies in the benefits provided. \n Community consultation to develop collective initiatives benefiting the community. Business skills training to prepare children to keep accounts and handle money. \n Apprenticeships and on-the-job training for those with no previous work experience. \n Life skills training, including basic social norms and civic education, parenting skills, rights at work and home, prevention of HIV\/AIDS, and education to counter interpersonal violence. \n Incorporation of gender-transformative approaches to ensure sensitivity to the particular challenges faced by girls, increase awareness in both girls and boys of the challenges faced by the other gender, and foster positive gender relationships. \n Development of skills in non-violent conflict resolution and anger management to help CAAFAG in their everyday lives. \n Provision of childcare and, if necessary, flexible training schedules for girl mothers.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -141967,7 +141967,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2343, - "Paragraph": "Vocational training opportunities for children shall be realistic in terms of what the local economy can support and shall also reflect the wishes of the child. There should be made available as wide a range of training options as possible, consistent with local market conditions, to help children adapt successfully to civilian life and to what the market demands. This training may build on skills and competencies learned when the child was associated with an armed force or group. A choice of training options beyond traditional areas should be promoted, as should the provision of support to girls (including financial and childcare support, where appropriate). More specifically, vocational and skills training may include: \\n Analysis of livelihood systems, agriculture, market opportunities, and household economies to develop economically relevant training, alternative forms of education and opportunities for economic reintegration. \\n Coordination between stakeholders to improve lessons learned, development of joint programmes, appropriate referrals and measures to avoid inconsistencies in the benefits provided. \\n Community consultation to develop collective initiatives benefiting the community. Business skills training to prepare children to keep accounts and handle money. \\n Apprenticeships and on-the-job training for those with no previous work experience. \\n Life skills training, including basic social norms and civic education, parenting skills, rights at work and home, prevention of HIV\/AIDS, and education to counter interpersonal violence. \\n Incorporation of gender-transformative approaches to ensure sensitivity to the particular challenges faced by girls, increase awareness in both girls and boys of the challenges faced by the other gender, and foster positive gender relationships. \\n Development of skills in non-violent conflict resolution and anger management to help CAAFAG in their everyday lives. \\n Provision of childcare and, if necessary, flexible training schedules for girl mothers.", + "Paragraph": "Vocational training opportunities for children shall be realistic in terms of what the local economy can support and shall also reflect the wishes of the child. There should be made available as wide a range of training options as possible, consistent with local market conditions, to help children adapt successfully to civilian life and to what the market demands. This training may build on skills and competencies learned when the child was associated with an armed force or group. A choice of training options beyond traditional areas should be promoted, as should the provision of support to girls (including financial and childcare support, where appropriate). More specifically, vocational and skills training may include: \n Analysis of livelihood systems, agriculture, market opportunities, and household economies to develop economically relevant training, alternative forms of education and opportunities for economic reintegration. \n Coordination between stakeholders to improve lessons learned, development of joint programmes, appropriate referrals and measures to avoid inconsistencies in the benefits provided. \n Community consultation to develop collective initiatives benefiting the community. Business skills training to prepare children to keep accounts and handle money. \n Apprenticeships and on-the-job training for those with no previous work experience. \n Life skills training, including basic social norms and civic education, parenting skills, rights at work and home, prevention of HIV\/AIDS, and education to counter interpersonal violence. \n Incorporation of gender-transformative approaches to ensure sensitivity to the particular challenges faced by girls, increase awareness in both girls and boys of the challenges faced by the other gender, and foster positive gender relationships. \n Development of skills in non-violent conflict resolution and anger management to help CAAFAG in their everyday lives. \n Provision of childcare and, if necessary, flexible training schedules for girl mothers.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -141985,7 +141985,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2343, - "Paragraph": "Vocational training opportunities for children shall be realistic in terms of what the local economy can support and shall also reflect the wishes of the child. There should be made available as wide a range of training options as possible, consistent with local market conditions, to help children adapt successfully to civilian life and to what the market demands. This training may build on skills and competencies learned when the child was associated with an armed force or group. A choice of training options beyond traditional areas should be promoted, as should the provision of support to girls (including financial and childcare support, where appropriate). More specifically, vocational and skills training may include: \\n Analysis of livelihood systems, agriculture, market opportunities, and household economies to develop economically relevant training, alternative forms of education and opportunities for economic reintegration. \\n Coordination between stakeholders to improve lessons learned, development of joint programmes, appropriate referrals and measures to avoid inconsistencies in the benefits provided. \\n Community consultation to develop collective initiatives benefiting the community. Business skills training to prepare children to keep accounts and handle money. \\n Apprenticeships and on-the-job training for those with no previous work experience. \\n Life skills training, including basic social norms and civic education, parenting skills, rights at work and home, prevention of HIV\/AIDS, and education to counter interpersonal violence. \\n Incorporation of gender-transformative approaches to ensure sensitivity to the particular challenges faced by girls, increase awareness in both girls and boys of the challenges faced by the other gender, and foster positive gender relationships. \\n Development of skills in non-violent conflict resolution and anger management to help CAAFAG in their everyday lives. \\n Provision of childcare and, if necessary, flexible training schedules for girl mothers.", + "Paragraph": "Vocational training opportunities for children shall be realistic in terms of what the local economy can support and shall also reflect the wishes of the child. There should be made available as wide a range of training options as possible, consistent with local market conditions, to help children adapt successfully to civilian life and to what the market demands. This training may build on skills and competencies learned when the child was associated with an armed force or group. A choice of training options beyond traditional areas should be promoted, as should the provision of support to girls (including financial and childcare support, where appropriate). More specifically, vocational and skills training may include: \n Analysis of livelihood systems, agriculture, market opportunities, and household economies to develop economically relevant training, alternative forms of education and opportunities for economic reintegration. \n Coordination between stakeholders to improve lessons learned, development of joint programmes, appropriate referrals and measures to avoid inconsistencies in the benefits provided. \n Community consultation to develop collective initiatives benefiting the community. Business skills training to prepare children to keep accounts and handle money. \n Apprenticeships and on-the-job training for those with no previous work experience. \n Life skills training, including basic social norms and civic education, parenting skills, rights at work and home, prevention of HIV\/AIDS, and education to counter interpersonal violence. \n Incorporation of gender-transformative approaches to ensure sensitivity to the particular challenges faced by girls, increase awareness in both girls and boys of the challenges faced by the other gender, and foster positive gender relationships. \n Development of skills in non-violent conflict resolution and anger management to help CAAFAG in their everyday lives. \n Provision of childcare and, if necessary, flexible training schedules for girl mothers.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142003,7 +142003,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2343, - "Paragraph": "Vocational training opportunities for children shall be realistic in terms of what the local economy can support and shall also reflect the wishes of the child. There should be made available as wide a range of training options as possible, consistent with local market conditions, to help children adapt successfully to civilian life and to what the market demands. This training may build on skills and competencies learned when the child was associated with an armed force or group. A choice of training options beyond traditional areas should be promoted, as should the provision of support to girls (including financial and childcare support, where appropriate). More specifically, vocational and skills training may include: \\n Analysis of livelihood systems, agriculture, market opportunities, and household economies to develop economically relevant training, alternative forms of education and opportunities for economic reintegration. \\n Coordination between stakeholders to improve lessons learned, development of joint programmes, appropriate referrals and measures to avoid inconsistencies in the benefits provided. \\n Community consultation to develop collective initiatives benefiting the community. Business skills training to prepare children to keep accounts and handle money. \\n Apprenticeships and on-the-job training for those with no previous work experience. \\n Life skills training, including basic social norms and civic education, parenting skills, rights at work and home, prevention of HIV\/AIDS, and education to counter interpersonal violence. \\n Incorporation of gender-transformative approaches to ensure sensitivity to the particular challenges faced by girls, increase awareness in both girls and boys of the challenges faced by the other gender, and foster positive gender relationships. \\n Development of skills in non-violent conflict resolution and anger management to help CAAFAG in their everyday lives. \\n Provision of childcare and, if necessary, flexible training schedules for girl mothers.", + "Paragraph": "Vocational training opportunities for children shall be realistic in terms of what the local economy can support and shall also reflect the wishes of the child. There should be made available as wide a range of training options as possible, consistent with local market conditions, to help children adapt successfully to civilian life and to what the market demands. This training may build on skills and competencies learned when the child was associated with an armed force or group. A choice of training options beyond traditional areas should be promoted, as should the provision of support to girls (including financial and childcare support, where appropriate). More specifically, vocational and skills training may include: \n Analysis of livelihood systems, agriculture, market opportunities, and household economies to develop economically relevant training, alternative forms of education and opportunities for economic reintegration. \n Coordination between stakeholders to improve lessons learned, development of joint programmes, appropriate referrals and measures to avoid inconsistencies in the benefits provided. \n Community consultation to develop collective initiatives benefiting the community. Business skills training to prepare children to keep accounts and handle money. \n Apprenticeships and on-the-job training for those with no previous work experience. \n Life skills training, including basic social norms and civic education, parenting skills, rights at work and home, prevention of HIV\/AIDS, and education to counter interpersonal violence. \n Incorporation of gender-transformative approaches to ensure sensitivity to the particular challenges faced by girls, increase awareness in both girls and boys of the challenges faced by the other gender, and foster positive gender relationships. \n Development of skills in non-violent conflict resolution and anger management to help CAAFAG in their everyday lives. \n Provision of childcare and, if necessary, flexible training schedules for girl mothers.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142014,14 +142014,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.7 Vocational training and livelihood development", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "More specifically, vocational and skills training may include: \\n Analysis of livelihood systems, agriculture, market opportunities, and household economies to develop economically relevant training, alternative forms of education and opportunities for economic reintegration.", + "Sentence": "More specifically, vocational and skills training may include: \n Analysis of livelihood systems, agriculture, market opportunities, and household economies to develop economically relevant training, alternative forms of education and opportunities for economic reintegration.", "newParagraph": "vocational training opportunity child shall realistic term local economy support shall also reflect wish child made available wide range training option possible consistent local market condition help child adapt successfully civilian life market demand training may build skill competency learned child associated armed force group choice training option beyond traditional area promoted provision support girl including financial childcare support appropriate specifically vocational skill training may include n analysis livelihood system agriculture market opportunity household economy develop economically relevant training alternative form education opportunity economic reintegration n coordination stakeholder improve lesson learned development joint programme appropriate referral measure avoid inconsistency benefit provided n community consultation develop collective initiative benefiting community business skill training prepare child keep account handle money n apprenticeship onthejob training previous work experience n life skill training including basic social norm civic education parenting skill right work home prevention hivaids education counter interpersonal violence n incorporation gendertransformative approach ensure sensitivity particular challenge faced girl increase awareness girl boy challenge faced gender foster positive gender relationship n development skill nonviolent conflict resolution anger management help caafag everyday life n provision childcare necessary flexible training schedule girl mother", "ProcessedSent": "specifically vocational skill training may include n analysis livelihood system agriculture market opportunity household economy develop economically relevant training alternative form education opportunity economic reintegration", "SentID": 7889 }, { "ParagraphID": 2343, - "Paragraph": "Vocational training opportunities for children shall be realistic in terms of what the local economy can support and shall also reflect the wishes of the child. There should be made available as wide a range of training options as possible, consistent with local market conditions, to help children adapt successfully to civilian life and to what the market demands. This training may build on skills and competencies learned when the child was associated with an armed force or group. A choice of training options beyond traditional areas should be promoted, as should the provision of support to girls (including financial and childcare support, where appropriate). More specifically, vocational and skills training may include: \\n Analysis of livelihood systems, agriculture, market opportunities, and household economies to develop economically relevant training, alternative forms of education and opportunities for economic reintegration. \\n Coordination between stakeholders to improve lessons learned, development of joint programmes, appropriate referrals and measures to avoid inconsistencies in the benefits provided. \\n Community consultation to develop collective initiatives benefiting the community. Business skills training to prepare children to keep accounts and handle money. \\n Apprenticeships and on-the-job training for those with no previous work experience. \\n Life skills training, including basic social norms and civic education, parenting skills, rights at work and home, prevention of HIV\/AIDS, and education to counter interpersonal violence. \\n Incorporation of gender-transformative approaches to ensure sensitivity to the particular challenges faced by girls, increase awareness in both girls and boys of the challenges faced by the other gender, and foster positive gender relationships. \\n Development of skills in non-violent conflict resolution and anger management to help CAAFAG in their everyday lives. \\n Provision of childcare and, if necessary, flexible training schedules for girl mothers.", + "Paragraph": "Vocational training opportunities for children shall be realistic in terms of what the local economy can support and shall also reflect the wishes of the child. There should be made available as wide a range of training options as possible, consistent with local market conditions, to help children adapt successfully to civilian life and to what the market demands. This training may build on skills and competencies learned when the child was associated with an armed force or group. A choice of training options beyond traditional areas should be promoted, as should the provision of support to girls (including financial and childcare support, where appropriate). More specifically, vocational and skills training may include: \n Analysis of livelihood systems, agriculture, market opportunities, and household economies to develop economically relevant training, alternative forms of education and opportunities for economic reintegration. \n Coordination between stakeholders to improve lessons learned, development of joint programmes, appropriate referrals and measures to avoid inconsistencies in the benefits provided. \n Community consultation to develop collective initiatives benefiting the community. Business skills training to prepare children to keep accounts and handle money. \n Apprenticeships and on-the-job training for those with no previous work experience. \n Life skills training, including basic social norms and civic education, parenting skills, rights at work and home, prevention of HIV\/AIDS, and education to counter interpersonal violence. \n Incorporation of gender-transformative approaches to ensure sensitivity to the particular challenges faced by girls, increase awareness in both girls and boys of the challenges faced by the other gender, and foster positive gender relationships. \n Development of skills in non-violent conflict resolution and anger management to help CAAFAG in their everyday lives. \n Provision of childcare and, if necessary, flexible training schedules for girl mothers.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142032,14 +142032,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.7 Vocational training and livelihood development", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Coordination between stakeholders to improve lessons learned, development of joint programmes, appropriate referrals and measures to avoid inconsistencies in the benefits provided.", + "Sentence": "\n Coordination between stakeholders to improve lessons learned, development of joint programmes, appropriate referrals and measures to avoid inconsistencies in the benefits provided.", "newParagraph": "vocational training opportunity child shall realistic term local economy support shall also reflect wish child made available wide range training option possible consistent local market condition help child adapt successfully civilian life market demand training may build skill competency learned child associated armed force group choice training option beyond traditional area promoted provision support girl including financial childcare support appropriate specifically vocational skill training may include n analysis livelihood system agriculture market opportunity household economy develop economically relevant training alternative form education opportunity economic reintegration n coordination stakeholder improve lesson learned development joint programme appropriate referral measure avoid inconsistency benefit provided n community consultation develop collective initiative benefiting community business skill training prepare child keep account handle money n apprenticeship onthejob training previous work experience n life skill training including basic social norm civic education parenting skill right work home prevention hivaids education counter interpersonal violence n incorporation gendertransformative approach ensure sensitivity particular challenge faced girl increase awareness girl boy challenge faced gender foster positive gender relationship n development skill nonviolent conflict resolution anger management help caafag everyday life n provision childcare necessary flexible training schedule girl mother", "ProcessedSent": "n coordination stakeholder improve lesson learned development joint programme appropriate referral measure avoid inconsistency benefit provided", "SentID": 7890 }, { "ParagraphID": 2343, - "Paragraph": "Vocational training opportunities for children shall be realistic in terms of what the local economy can support and shall also reflect the wishes of the child. There should be made available as wide a range of training options as possible, consistent with local market conditions, to help children adapt successfully to civilian life and to what the market demands. This training may build on skills and competencies learned when the child was associated with an armed force or group. A choice of training options beyond traditional areas should be promoted, as should the provision of support to girls (including financial and childcare support, where appropriate). More specifically, vocational and skills training may include: \\n Analysis of livelihood systems, agriculture, market opportunities, and household economies to develop economically relevant training, alternative forms of education and opportunities for economic reintegration. \\n Coordination between stakeholders to improve lessons learned, development of joint programmes, appropriate referrals and measures to avoid inconsistencies in the benefits provided. \\n Community consultation to develop collective initiatives benefiting the community. Business skills training to prepare children to keep accounts and handle money. \\n Apprenticeships and on-the-job training for those with no previous work experience. \\n Life skills training, including basic social norms and civic education, parenting skills, rights at work and home, prevention of HIV\/AIDS, and education to counter interpersonal violence. \\n Incorporation of gender-transformative approaches to ensure sensitivity to the particular challenges faced by girls, increase awareness in both girls and boys of the challenges faced by the other gender, and foster positive gender relationships. \\n Development of skills in non-violent conflict resolution and anger management to help CAAFAG in their everyday lives. \\n Provision of childcare and, if necessary, flexible training schedules for girl mothers.", + "Paragraph": "Vocational training opportunities for children shall be realistic in terms of what the local economy can support and shall also reflect the wishes of the child. There should be made available as wide a range of training options as possible, consistent with local market conditions, to help children adapt successfully to civilian life and to what the market demands. This training may build on skills and competencies learned when the child was associated with an armed force or group. A choice of training options beyond traditional areas should be promoted, as should the provision of support to girls (including financial and childcare support, where appropriate). More specifically, vocational and skills training may include: \n Analysis of livelihood systems, agriculture, market opportunities, and household economies to develop economically relevant training, alternative forms of education and opportunities for economic reintegration. \n Coordination between stakeholders to improve lessons learned, development of joint programmes, appropriate referrals and measures to avoid inconsistencies in the benefits provided. \n Community consultation to develop collective initiatives benefiting the community. Business skills training to prepare children to keep accounts and handle money. \n Apprenticeships and on-the-job training for those with no previous work experience. \n Life skills training, including basic social norms and civic education, parenting skills, rights at work and home, prevention of HIV\/AIDS, and education to counter interpersonal violence. \n Incorporation of gender-transformative approaches to ensure sensitivity to the particular challenges faced by girls, increase awareness in both girls and boys of the challenges faced by the other gender, and foster positive gender relationships. \n Development of skills in non-violent conflict resolution and anger management to help CAAFAG in their everyday lives. \n Provision of childcare and, if necessary, flexible training schedules for girl mothers.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142050,14 +142050,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.7 Vocational training and livelihood development", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Community consultation to develop collective initiatives benefiting the community.", + "Sentence": "\n Community consultation to develop collective initiatives benefiting the community.", "newParagraph": "vocational training opportunity child shall realistic term local economy support shall also reflect wish child made available wide range training option possible consistent local market condition help child adapt successfully civilian life market demand training may build skill competency learned child associated armed force group choice training option beyond traditional area promoted provision support girl including financial childcare support appropriate specifically vocational skill training may include n analysis livelihood system agriculture market opportunity household economy develop economically relevant training alternative form education opportunity economic reintegration n coordination stakeholder improve lesson learned development joint programme appropriate referral measure avoid inconsistency benefit provided n community consultation develop collective initiative benefiting community business skill training prepare child keep account handle money n apprenticeship onthejob training previous work experience n life skill training including basic social norm civic education parenting skill right work home prevention hivaids education counter interpersonal violence n incorporation gendertransformative approach ensure sensitivity particular challenge faced girl increase awareness girl boy challenge faced gender foster positive gender relationship n development skill nonviolent conflict resolution anger management help caafag everyday life n provision childcare necessary flexible training schedule girl mother", "ProcessedSent": "n community consultation develop collective initiative benefiting community", "SentID": 7891 }, { "ParagraphID": 2343, - "Paragraph": "Vocational training opportunities for children shall be realistic in terms of what the local economy can support and shall also reflect the wishes of the child. There should be made available as wide a range of training options as possible, consistent with local market conditions, to help children adapt successfully to civilian life and to what the market demands. This training may build on skills and competencies learned when the child was associated with an armed force or group. A choice of training options beyond traditional areas should be promoted, as should the provision of support to girls (including financial and childcare support, where appropriate). More specifically, vocational and skills training may include: \\n Analysis of livelihood systems, agriculture, market opportunities, and household economies to develop economically relevant training, alternative forms of education and opportunities for economic reintegration. \\n Coordination between stakeholders to improve lessons learned, development of joint programmes, appropriate referrals and measures to avoid inconsistencies in the benefits provided. \\n Community consultation to develop collective initiatives benefiting the community. Business skills training to prepare children to keep accounts and handle money. \\n Apprenticeships and on-the-job training for those with no previous work experience. \\n Life skills training, including basic social norms and civic education, parenting skills, rights at work and home, prevention of HIV\/AIDS, and education to counter interpersonal violence. \\n Incorporation of gender-transformative approaches to ensure sensitivity to the particular challenges faced by girls, increase awareness in both girls and boys of the challenges faced by the other gender, and foster positive gender relationships. \\n Development of skills in non-violent conflict resolution and anger management to help CAAFAG in their everyday lives. \\n Provision of childcare and, if necessary, flexible training schedules for girl mothers.", + "Paragraph": "Vocational training opportunities for children shall be realistic in terms of what the local economy can support and shall also reflect the wishes of the child. There should be made available as wide a range of training options as possible, consistent with local market conditions, to help children adapt successfully to civilian life and to what the market demands. This training may build on skills and competencies learned when the child was associated with an armed force or group. A choice of training options beyond traditional areas should be promoted, as should the provision of support to girls (including financial and childcare support, where appropriate). More specifically, vocational and skills training may include: \n Analysis of livelihood systems, agriculture, market opportunities, and household economies to develop economically relevant training, alternative forms of education and opportunities for economic reintegration. \n Coordination between stakeholders to improve lessons learned, development of joint programmes, appropriate referrals and measures to avoid inconsistencies in the benefits provided. \n Community consultation to develop collective initiatives benefiting the community. Business skills training to prepare children to keep accounts and handle money. \n Apprenticeships and on-the-job training for those with no previous work experience. \n Life skills training, including basic social norms and civic education, parenting skills, rights at work and home, prevention of HIV\/AIDS, and education to counter interpersonal violence. \n Incorporation of gender-transformative approaches to ensure sensitivity to the particular challenges faced by girls, increase awareness in both girls and boys of the challenges faced by the other gender, and foster positive gender relationships. \n Development of skills in non-violent conflict resolution and anger management to help CAAFAG in their everyday lives. \n Provision of childcare and, if necessary, flexible training schedules for girl mothers.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142075,7 +142075,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2343, - "Paragraph": "Vocational training opportunities for children shall be realistic in terms of what the local economy can support and shall also reflect the wishes of the child. There should be made available as wide a range of training options as possible, consistent with local market conditions, to help children adapt successfully to civilian life and to what the market demands. This training may build on skills and competencies learned when the child was associated with an armed force or group. A choice of training options beyond traditional areas should be promoted, as should the provision of support to girls (including financial and childcare support, where appropriate). More specifically, vocational and skills training may include: \\n Analysis of livelihood systems, agriculture, market opportunities, and household economies to develop economically relevant training, alternative forms of education and opportunities for economic reintegration. \\n Coordination between stakeholders to improve lessons learned, development of joint programmes, appropriate referrals and measures to avoid inconsistencies in the benefits provided. \\n Community consultation to develop collective initiatives benefiting the community. Business skills training to prepare children to keep accounts and handle money. \\n Apprenticeships and on-the-job training for those with no previous work experience. \\n Life skills training, including basic social norms and civic education, parenting skills, rights at work and home, prevention of HIV\/AIDS, and education to counter interpersonal violence. \\n Incorporation of gender-transformative approaches to ensure sensitivity to the particular challenges faced by girls, increase awareness in both girls and boys of the challenges faced by the other gender, and foster positive gender relationships. \\n Development of skills in non-violent conflict resolution and anger management to help CAAFAG in their everyday lives. \\n Provision of childcare and, if necessary, flexible training schedules for girl mothers.", + "Paragraph": "Vocational training opportunities for children shall be realistic in terms of what the local economy can support and shall also reflect the wishes of the child. There should be made available as wide a range of training options as possible, consistent with local market conditions, to help children adapt successfully to civilian life and to what the market demands. This training may build on skills and competencies learned when the child was associated with an armed force or group. A choice of training options beyond traditional areas should be promoted, as should the provision of support to girls (including financial and childcare support, where appropriate). More specifically, vocational and skills training may include: \n Analysis of livelihood systems, agriculture, market opportunities, and household economies to develop economically relevant training, alternative forms of education and opportunities for economic reintegration. \n Coordination between stakeholders to improve lessons learned, development of joint programmes, appropriate referrals and measures to avoid inconsistencies in the benefits provided. \n Community consultation to develop collective initiatives benefiting the community. Business skills training to prepare children to keep accounts and handle money. \n Apprenticeships and on-the-job training for those with no previous work experience. \n Life skills training, including basic social norms and civic education, parenting skills, rights at work and home, prevention of HIV\/AIDS, and education to counter interpersonal violence. \n Incorporation of gender-transformative approaches to ensure sensitivity to the particular challenges faced by girls, increase awareness in both girls and boys of the challenges faced by the other gender, and foster positive gender relationships. \n Development of skills in non-violent conflict resolution and anger management to help CAAFAG in their everyday lives. \n Provision of childcare and, if necessary, flexible training schedules for girl mothers.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142086,14 +142086,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.7 Vocational training and livelihood development", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Apprenticeships and on-the-job training for those with no previous work experience.", + "Sentence": "\n Apprenticeships and on-the-job training for those with no previous work experience.", "newParagraph": "vocational training opportunity child shall realistic term local economy support shall also reflect wish child made available wide range training option possible consistent local market condition help child adapt successfully civilian life market demand training may build skill competency learned child associated armed force group choice training option beyond traditional area promoted provision support girl including financial childcare support appropriate specifically vocational skill training may include n analysis livelihood system agriculture market opportunity household economy develop economically relevant training alternative form education opportunity economic reintegration n coordination stakeholder improve lesson learned development joint programme appropriate referral measure avoid inconsistency benefit provided n community consultation develop collective initiative benefiting community business skill training prepare child keep account handle money n apprenticeship onthejob training previous work experience n life skill training including basic social norm civic education parenting skill right work home prevention hivaids education counter interpersonal violence n incorporation gendertransformative approach ensure sensitivity particular challenge faced girl increase awareness girl boy challenge faced gender foster positive gender relationship n development skill nonviolent conflict resolution anger management help caafag everyday life n provision childcare necessary flexible training schedule girl mother", "ProcessedSent": "n apprenticeship onthejob training previous work experience", "SentID": 7893 }, { "ParagraphID": 2343, - "Paragraph": "Vocational training opportunities for children shall be realistic in terms of what the local economy can support and shall also reflect the wishes of the child. There should be made available as wide a range of training options as possible, consistent with local market conditions, to help children adapt successfully to civilian life and to what the market demands. This training may build on skills and competencies learned when the child was associated with an armed force or group. A choice of training options beyond traditional areas should be promoted, as should the provision of support to girls (including financial and childcare support, where appropriate). More specifically, vocational and skills training may include: \\n Analysis of livelihood systems, agriculture, market opportunities, and household economies to develop economically relevant training, alternative forms of education and opportunities for economic reintegration. \\n Coordination between stakeholders to improve lessons learned, development of joint programmes, appropriate referrals and measures to avoid inconsistencies in the benefits provided. \\n Community consultation to develop collective initiatives benefiting the community. Business skills training to prepare children to keep accounts and handle money. \\n Apprenticeships and on-the-job training for those with no previous work experience. \\n Life skills training, including basic social norms and civic education, parenting skills, rights at work and home, prevention of HIV\/AIDS, and education to counter interpersonal violence. \\n Incorporation of gender-transformative approaches to ensure sensitivity to the particular challenges faced by girls, increase awareness in both girls and boys of the challenges faced by the other gender, and foster positive gender relationships. \\n Development of skills in non-violent conflict resolution and anger management to help CAAFAG in their everyday lives. \\n Provision of childcare and, if necessary, flexible training schedules for girl mothers.", + "Paragraph": "Vocational training opportunities for children shall be realistic in terms of what the local economy can support and shall also reflect the wishes of the child. There should be made available as wide a range of training options as possible, consistent with local market conditions, to help children adapt successfully to civilian life and to what the market demands. This training may build on skills and competencies learned when the child was associated with an armed force or group. A choice of training options beyond traditional areas should be promoted, as should the provision of support to girls (including financial and childcare support, where appropriate). More specifically, vocational and skills training may include: \n Analysis of livelihood systems, agriculture, market opportunities, and household economies to develop economically relevant training, alternative forms of education and opportunities for economic reintegration. \n Coordination between stakeholders to improve lessons learned, development of joint programmes, appropriate referrals and measures to avoid inconsistencies in the benefits provided. \n Community consultation to develop collective initiatives benefiting the community. Business skills training to prepare children to keep accounts and handle money. \n Apprenticeships and on-the-job training for those with no previous work experience. \n Life skills training, including basic social norms and civic education, parenting skills, rights at work and home, prevention of HIV\/AIDS, and education to counter interpersonal violence. \n Incorporation of gender-transformative approaches to ensure sensitivity to the particular challenges faced by girls, increase awareness in both girls and boys of the challenges faced by the other gender, and foster positive gender relationships. \n Development of skills in non-violent conflict resolution and anger management to help CAAFAG in their everyday lives. \n Provision of childcare and, if necessary, flexible training schedules for girl mothers.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142104,14 +142104,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.7 Vocational training and livelihood development", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Life skills training, including basic social norms and civic education, parenting skills, rights at work and home, prevention of HIV\/AIDS, and education to counter interpersonal violence.", + "Sentence": "\n Life skills training, including basic social norms and civic education, parenting skills, rights at work and home, prevention of HIV\/AIDS, and education to counter interpersonal violence.", "newParagraph": "vocational training opportunity child shall realistic term local economy support shall also reflect wish child made available wide range training option possible consistent local market condition help child adapt successfully civilian life market demand training may build skill competency learned child associated armed force group choice training option beyond traditional area promoted provision support girl including financial childcare support appropriate specifically vocational skill training may include n analysis livelihood system agriculture market opportunity household economy develop economically relevant training alternative form education opportunity economic reintegration n coordination stakeholder improve lesson learned development joint programme appropriate referral measure avoid inconsistency benefit provided n community consultation develop collective initiative benefiting community business skill training prepare child keep account handle money n apprenticeship onthejob training previous work experience n life skill training including basic social norm civic education parenting skill right work home prevention hivaids education counter interpersonal violence n incorporation gendertransformative approach ensure sensitivity particular challenge faced girl increase awareness girl boy challenge faced gender foster positive gender relationship n development skill nonviolent conflict resolution anger management help caafag everyday life n provision childcare necessary flexible training schedule girl mother", "ProcessedSent": "n life skill training including basic social norm civic education parenting skill right work home prevention hivaids education counter interpersonal violence", "SentID": 7894 }, { "ParagraphID": 2343, - "Paragraph": "Vocational training opportunities for children shall be realistic in terms of what the local economy can support and shall also reflect the wishes of the child. There should be made available as wide a range of training options as possible, consistent with local market conditions, to help children adapt successfully to civilian life and to what the market demands. This training may build on skills and competencies learned when the child was associated with an armed force or group. A choice of training options beyond traditional areas should be promoted, as should the provision of support to girls (including financial and childcare support, where appropriate). More specifically, vocational and skills training may include: \\n Analysis of livelihood systems, agriculture, market opportunities, and household economies to develop economically relevant training, alternative forms of education and opportunities for economic reintegration. \\n Coordination between stakeholders to improve lessons learned, development of joint programmes, appropriate referrals and measures to avoid inconsistencies in the benefits provided. \\n Community consultation to develop collective initiatives benefiting the community. Business skills training to prepare children to keep accounts and handle money. \\n Apprenticeships and on-the-job training for those with no previous work experience. \\n Life skills training, including basic social norms and civic education, parenting skills, rights at work and home, prevention of HIV\/AIDS, and education to counter interpersonal violence. \\n Incorporation of gender-transformative approaches to ensure sensitivity to the particular challenges faced by girls, increase awareness in both girls and boys of the challenges faced by the other gender, and foster positive gender relationships. \\n Development of skills in non-violent conflict resolution and anger management to help CAAFAG in their everyday lives. \\n Provision of childcare and, if necessary, flexible training schedules for girl mothers.", + "Paragraph": "Vocational training opportunities for children shall be realistic in terms of what the local economy can support and shall also reflect the wishes of the child. There should be made available as wide a range of training options as possible, consistent with local market conditions, to help children adapt successfully to civilian life and to what the market demands. This training may build on skills and competencies learned when the child was associated with an armed force or group. A choice of training options beyond traditional areas should be promoted, as should the provision of support to girls (including financial and childcare support, where appropriate). More specifically, vocational and skills training may include: \n Analysis of livelihood systems, agriculture, market opportunities, and household economies to develop economically relevant training, alternative forms of education and opportunities for economic reintegration. \n Coordination between stakeholders to improve lessons learned, development of joint programmes, appropriate referrals and measures to avoid inconsistencies in the benefits provided. \n Community consultation to develop collective initiatives benefiting the community. Business skills training to prepare children to keep accounts and handle money. \n Apprenticeships and on-the-job training for those with no previous work experience. \n Life skills training, including basic social norms and civic education, parenting skills, rights at work and home, prevention of HIV\/AIDS, and education to counter interpersonal violence. \n Incorporation of gender-transformative approaches to ensure sensitivity to the particular challenges faced by girls, increase awareness in both girls and boys of the challenges faced by the other gender, and foster positive gender relationships. \n Development of skills in non-violent conflict resolution and anger management to help CAAFAG in their everyday lives. \n Provision of childcare and, if necessary, flexible training schedules for girl mothers.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142122,14 +142122,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.7 Vocational training and livelihood development", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Incorporation of gender-transformative approaches to ensure sensitivity to the particular challenges faced by girls, increase awareness in both girls and boys of the challenges faced by the other gender, and foster positive gender relationships.", + "Sentence": "\n Incorporation of gender-transformative approaches to ensure sensitivity to the particular challenges faced by girls, increase awareness in both girls and boys of the challenges faced by the other gender, and foster positive gender relationships.", "newParagraph": "vocational training opportunity child shall realistic term local economy support shall also reflect wish child made available wide range training option possible consistent local market condition help child adapt successfully civilian life market demand training may build skill competency learned child associated armed force group choice training option beyond traditional area promoted provision support girl including financial childcare support appropriate specifically vocational skill training may include n analysis livelihood system agriculture market opportunity household economy develop economically relevant training alternative form education opportunity economic reintegration n coordination stakeholder improve lesson learned development joint programme appropriate referral measure avoid inconsistency benefit provided n community consultation develop collective initiative benefiting community business skill training prepare child keep account handle money n apprenticeship onthejob training previous work experience n life skill training including basic social norm civic education parenting skill right work home prevention hivaids education counter interpersonal violence n incorporation gendertransformative approach ensure sensitivity particular challenge faced girl increase awareness girl boy challenge faced gender foster positive gender relationship n development skill nonviolent conflict resolution anger management help caafag everyday life n provision childcare necessary flexible training schedule girl mother", "ProcessedSent": "n incorporation gendertransformative approach ensure sensitivity particular challenge faced girl increase awareness girl boy challenge faced gender foster positive gender relationship", "SentID": 7895 }, { "ParagraphID": 2343, - "Paragraph": "Vocational training opportunities for children shall be realistic in terms of what the local economy can support and shall also reflect the wishes of the child. There should be made available as wide a range of training options as possible, consistent with local market conditions, to help children adapt successfully to civilian life and to what the market demands. This training may build on skills and competencies learned when the child was associated with an armed force or group. A choice of training options beyond traditional areas should be promoted, as should the provision of support to girls (including financial and childcare support, where appropriate). More specifically, vocational and skills training may include: \\n Analysis of livelihood systems, agriculture, market opportunities, and household economies to develop economically relevant training, alternative forms of education and opportunities for economic reintegration. \\n Coordination between stakeholders to improve lessons learned, development of joint programmes, appropriate referrals and measures to avoid inconsistencies in the benefits provided. \\n Community consultation to develop collective initiatives benefiting the community. Business skills training to prepare children to keep accounts and handle money. \\n Apprenticeships and on-the-job training for those with no previous work experience. \\n Life skills training, including basic social norms and civic education, parenting skills, rights at work and home, prevention of HIV\/AIDS, and education to counter interpersonal violence. \\n Incorporation of gender-transformative approaches to ensure sensitivity to the particular challenges faced by girls, increase awareness in both girls and boys of the challenges faced by the other gender, and foster positive gender relationships. \\n Development of skills in non-violent conflict resolution and anger management to help CAAFAG in their everyday lives. \\n Provision of childcare and, if necessary, flexible training schedules for girl mothers.", + "Paragraph": "Vocational training opportunities for children shall be realistic in terms of what the local economy can support and shall also reflect the wishes of the child. There should be made available as wide a range of training options as possible, consistent with local market conditions, to help children adapt successfully to civilian life and to what the market demands. This training may build on skills and competencies learned when the child was associated with an armed force or group. A choice of training options beyond traditional areas should be promoted, as should the provision of support to girls (including financial and childcare support, where appropriate). More specifically, vocational and skills training may include: \n Analysis of livelihood systems, agriculture, market opportunities, and household economies to develop economically relevant training, alternative forms of education and opportunities for economic reintegration. \n Coordination between stakeholders to improve lessons learned, development of joint programmes, appropriate referrals and measures to avoid inconsistencies in the benefits provided. \n Community consultation to develop collective initiatives benefiting the community. Business skills training to prepare children to keep accounts and handle money. \n Apprenticeships and on-the-job training for those with no previous work experience. \n Life skills training, including basic social norms and civic education, parenting skills, rights at work and home, prevention of HIV\/AIDS, and education to counter interpersonal violence. \n Incorporation of gender-transformative approaches to ensure sensitivity to the particular challenges faced by girls, increase awareness in both girls and boys of the challenges faced by the other gender, and foster positive gender relationships. \n Development of skills in non-violent conflict resolution and anger management to help CAAFAG in their everyday lives. \n Provision of childcare and, if necessary, flexible training schedules for girl mothers.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142140,14 +142140,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.7 Vocational training and livelihood development", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Development of skills in non-violent conflict resolution and anger management to help CAAFAG in their everyday lives.", + "Sentence": "\n Development of skills in non-violent conflict resolution and anger management to help CAAFAG in their everyday lives.", "newParagraph": "vocational training opportunity child shall realistic term local economy support shall also reflect wish child made available wide range training option possible consistent local market condition help child adapt successfully civilian life market demand training may build skill competency learned child associated armed force group choice training option beyond traditional area promoted provision support girl including financial childcare support appropriate specifically vocational skill training may include n analysis livelihood system agriculture market opportunity household economy develop economically relevant training alternative form education opportunity economic reintegration n coordination stakeholder improve lesson learned development joint programme appropriate referral measure avoid inconsistency benefit provided n community consultation develop collective initiative benefiting community business skill training prepare child keep account handle money n apprenticeship onthejob training previous work experience n life skill training including basic social norm civic education parenting skill right work home prevention hivaids education counter interpersonal violence n incorporation gendertransformative approach ensure sensitivity particular challenge faced girl increase awareness girl boy challenge faced gender foster positive gender relationship n development skill nonviolent conflict resolution anger management help caafag everyday life n provision childcare necessary flexible training schedule girl mother", "ProcessedSent": "n development skill nonviolent conflict resolution anger management help caafag everyday life", "SentID": 7896 }, { "ParagraphID": 2343, - "Paragraph": "Vocational training opportunities for children shall be realistic in terms of what the local economy can support and shall also reflect the wishes of the child. There should be made available as wide a range of training options as possible, consistent with local market conditions, to help children adapt successfully to civilian life and to what the market demands. This training may build on skills and competencies learned when the child was associated with an armed force or group. A choice of training options beyond traditional areas should be promoted, as should the provision of support to girls (including financial and childcare support, where appropriate). More specifically, vocational and skills training may include: \\n Analysis of livelihood systems, agriculture, market opportunities, and household economies to develop economically relevant training, alternative forms of education and opportunities for economic reintegration. \\n Coordination between stakeholders to improve lessons learned, development of joint programmes, appropriate referrals and measures to avoid inconsistencies in the benefits provided. \\n Community consultation to develop collective initiatives benefiting the community. Business skills training to prepare children to keep accounts and handle money. \\n Apprenticeships and on-the-job training for those with no previous work experience. \\n Life skills training, including basic social norms and civic education, parenting skills, rights at work and home, prevention of HIV\/AIDS, and education to counter interpersonal violence. \\n Incorporation of gender-transformative approaches to ensure sensitivity to the particular challenges faced by girls, increase awareness in both girls and boys of the challenges faced by the other gender, and foster positive gender relationships. \\n Development of skills in non-violent conflict resolution and anger management to help CAAFAG in their everyday lives. \\n Provision of childcare and, if necessary, flexible training schedules for girl mothers.", + "Paragraph": "Vocational training opportunities for children shall be realistic in terms of what the local economy can support and shall also reflect the wishes of the child. There should be made available as wide a range of training options as possible, consistent with local market conditions, to help children adapt successfully to civilian life and to what the market demands. This training may build on skills and competencies learned when the child was associated with an armed force or group. A choice of training options beyond traditional areas should be promoted, as should the provision of support to girls (including financial and childcare support, where appropriate). More specifically, vocational and skills training may include: \n Analysis of livelihood systems, agriculture, market opportunities, and household economies to develop economically relevant training, alternative forms of education and opportunities for economic reintegration. \n Coordination between stakeholders to improve lessons learned, development of joint programmes, appropriate referrals and measures to avoid inconsistencies in the benefits provided. \n Community consultation to develop collective initiatives benefiting the community. Business skills training to prepare children to keep accounts and handle money. \n Apprenticeships and on-the-job training for those with no previous work experience. \n Life skills training, including basic social norms and civic education, parenting skills, rights at work and home, prevention of HIV\/AIDS, and education to counter interpersonal violence. \n Incorporation of gender-transformative approaches to ensure sensitivity to the particular challenges faced by girls, increase awareness in both girls and boys of the challenges faced by the other gender, and foster positive gender relationships. \n Development of skills in non-violent conflict resolution and anger management to help CAAFAG in their everyday lives. \n Provision of childcare and, if necessary, flexible training schedules for girl mothers.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142158,7 +142158,7 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.7 Vocational training and livelihood development", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Provision of childcare and, if necessary, flexible training schedules for girl mothers.", + "Sentence": "\n Provision of childcare and, if necessary, flexible training schedules for girl mothers.", "newParagraph": "vocational training opportunity child shall realistic term local economy support shall also reflect wish child made available wide range training option possible consistent local market condition help child adapt successfully civilian life market demand training may build skill competency learned child associated armed force group choice training option beyond traditional area promoted provision support girl including financial childcare support appropriate specifically vocational skill training may include n analysis livelihood system agriculture market opportunity household economy develop economically relevant training alternative form education opportunity economic reintegration n coordination stakeholder improve lesson learned development joint programme appropriate referral measure avoid inconsistency benefit provided n community consultation develop collective initiative benefiting community business skill training prepare child keep account handle money n apprenticeship onthejob training previous work experience n life skill training including basic social norm civic education parenting skill right work home prevention hivaids education counter interpersonal violence n incorporation gendertransformative approach ensure sensitivity particular challenge faced girl increase awareness girl boy challenge faced gender foster positive gender relationship n development skill nonviolent conflict resolution anger management help caafag everyday life n provision childcare necessary flexible training schedule girl mother", "ProcessedSent": "n provision childcare necessary flexible training schedule girl mother", "SentID": 7897 @@ -142291,7 +142291,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2345, - "Paragraph": "As part of planning and implementing a child-sensitive approach to DDR-related interventions, CAAFAG can be provided with social protection assistance to reduce vulnerability to poverty and deprivation, promote social inclusion and child protection, and strengthen family and community resilience. This may include: \\n Multipurpose cash grants. \\n Commodity (e.g., food or rent) or value vouchers. \\n Family and child allowances. \\n Disability social pensions and benefits. \\n Transfers in exchange for a parent working (cash for work). \\n Transfers in exchange for attending health check-ups (for all family members). \\n Business recovery or start-up grants (for older children or parents of CAAFAG) subject to conditions (e.g., business management training, business plan development, etc.); and \\n Scholarship benefits restricted to certain areas (e.g., school fees, school supplies, etc.).", + "Paragraph": "As part of planning and implementing a child-sensitive approach to DDR-related interventions, CAAFAG can be provided with social protection assistance to reduce vulnerability to poverty and deprivation, promote social inclusion and child protection, and strengthen family and community resilience. This may include: \n Multipurpose cash grants. \n Commodity (e.g., food or rent) or value vouchers. \n Family and child allowances. \n Disability social pensions and benefits. \n Transfers in exchange for a parent working (cash for work). \n Transfers in exchange for attending health check-ups (for all family members). \n Business recovery or start-up grants (for older children or parents of CAAFAG) subject to conditions (e.g., business management training, business plan development, etc.); and \n Scholarship benefits restricted to certain areas (e.g., school fees, school supplies, etc.).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142309,7 +142309,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2345, - "Paragraph": "As part of planning and implementing a child-sensitive approach to DDR-related interventions, CAAFAG can be provided with social protection assistance to reduce vulnerability to poverty and deprivation, promote social inclusion and child protection, and strengthen family and community resilience. This may include: \\n Multipurpose cash grants. \\n Commodity (e.g., food or rent) or value vouchers. \\n Family and child allowances. \\n Disability social pensions and benefits. \\n Transfers in exchange for a parent working (cash for work). \\n Transfers in exchange for attending health check-ups (for all family members). \\n Business recovery or start-up grants (for older children or parents of CAAFAG) subject to conditions (e.g., business management training, business plan development, etc.); and \\n Scholarship benefits restricted to certain areas (e.g., school fees, school supplies, etc.).", + "Paragraph": "As part of planning and implementing a child-sensitive approach to DDR-related interventions, CAAFAG can be provided with social protection assistance to reduce vulnerability to poverty and deprivation, promote social inclusion and child protection, and strengthen family and community resilience. This may include: \n Multipurpose cash grants. \n Commodity (e.g., food or rent) or value vouchers. \n Family and child allowances. \n Disability social pensions and benefits. \n Transfers in exchange for a parent working (cash for work). \n Transfers in exchange for attending health check-ups (for all family members). \n Business recovery or start-up grants (for older children or parents of CAAFAG) subject to conditions (e.g., business management training, business plan development, etc.); and \n Scholarship benefits restricted to certain areas (e.g., school fees, school supplies, etc.).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142320,14 +142320,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.8 Social protection assistance", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This may include: \\n Multipurpose cash grants.", + "Sentence": "This may include: \n Multipurpose cash grants.", "newParagraph": "part planning implementing childsensitive approach ddrrelated intervention caafag provided social protection assistance reduce vulnerability poverty deprivation promote social inclusion child protection strengthen family community resilience may include n multipurpose cash grant n commodity eg food rent value voucher n family child allowance n disability social pension benefit n transfer exchange parent working cash work n transfer exchange attending health checkup family member n business recovery startup grant older child parent caafag subject condition eg business management training business plan development etc n scholarship benefit restricted certain area eg school fee school supply etc", "ProcessedSent": "may include n multipurpose cash grant", "SentID": 7906 }, { "ParagraphID": 2345, - "Paragraph": "As part of planning and implementing a child-sensitive approach to DDR-related interventions, CAAFAG can be provided with social protection assistance to reduce vulnerability to poverty and deprivation, promote social inclusion and child protection, and strengthen family and community resilience. This may include: \\n Multipurpose cash grants. \\n Commodity (e.g., food or rent) or value vouchers. \\n Family and child allowances. \\n Disability social pensions and benefits. \\n Transfers in exchange for a parent working (cash for work). \\n Transfers in exchange for attending health check-ups (for all family members). \\n Business recovery or start-up grants (for older children or parents of CAAFAG) subject to conditions (e.g., business management training, business plan development, etc.); and \\n Scholarship benefits restricted to certain areas (e.g., school fees, school supplies, etc.).", + "Paragraph": "As part of planning and implementing a child-sensitive approach to DDR-related interventions, CAAFAG can be provided with social protection assistance to reduce vulnerability to poverty and deprivation, promote social inclusion and child protection, and strengthen family and community resilience. This may include: \n Multipurpose cash grants. \n Commodity (e.g., food or rent) or value vouchers. \n Family and child allowances. \n Disability social pensions and benefits. \n Transfers in exchange for a parent working (cash for work). \n Transfers in exchange for attending health check-ups (for all family members). \n Business recovery or start-up grants (for older children or parents of CAAFAG) subject to conditions (e.g., business management training, business plan development, etc.); and \n Scholarship benefits restricted to certain areas (e.g., school fees, school supplies, etc.).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142338,14 +142338,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.8 Social protection assistance", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Commodity (e.g., food or rent) or value vouchers.", + "Sentence": "\n Commodity (e.g., food or rent) or value vouchers.", "newParagraph": "part planning implementing childsensitive approach ddrrelated intervention caafag provided social protection assistance reduce vulnerability poverty deprivation promote social inclusion child protection strengthen family community resilience may include n multipurpose cash grant n commodity eg food rent value voucher n family child allowance n disability social pension benefit n transfer exchange parent working cash work n transfer exchange attending health checkup family member n business recovery startup grant older child parent caafag subject condition eg business management training business plan development etc n scholarship benefit restricted certain area eg school fee school supply etc", "ProcessedSent": "n commodity eg food rent value voucher", "SentID": 7907 }, { "ParagraphID": 2345, - "Paragraph": "As part of planning and implementing a child-sensitive approach to DDR-related interventions, CAAFAG can be provided with social protection assistance to reduce vulnerability to poverty and deprivation, promote social inclusion and child protection, and strengthen family and community resilience. This may include: \\n Multipurpose cash grants. \\n Commodity (e.g., food or rent) or value vouchers. \\n Family and child allowances. \\n Disability social pensions and benefits. \\n Transfers in exchange for a parent working (cash for work). \\n Transfers in exchange for attending health check-ups (for all family members). \\n Business recovery or start-up grants (for older children or parents of CAAFAG) subject to conditions (e.g., business management training, business plan development, etc.); and \\n Scholarship benefits restricted to certain areas (e.g., school fees, school supplies, etc.).", + "Paragraph": "As part of planning and implementing a child-sensitive approach to DDR-related interventions, CAAFAG can be provided with social protection assistance to reduce vulnerability to poverty and deprivation, promote social inclusion and child protection, and strengthen family and community resilience. This may include: \n Multipurpose cash grants. \n Commodity (e.g., food or rent) or value vouchers. \n Family and child allowances. \n Disability social pensions and benefits. \n Transfers in exchange for a parent working (cash for work). \n Transfers in exchange for attending health check-ups (for all family members). \n Business recovery or start-up grants (for older children or parents of CAAFAG) subject to conditions (e.g., business management training, business plan development, etc.); and \n Scholarship benefits restricted to certain areas (e.g., school fees, school supplies, etc.).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142356,14 +142356,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.8 Social protection assistance", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Family and child allowances.", + "Sentence": "\n Family and child allowances.", "newParagraph": "part planning implementing childsensitive approach ddrrelated intervention caafag provided social protection assistance reduce vulnerability poverty deprivation promote social inclusion child protection strengthen family community resilience may include n multipurpose cash grant n commodity eg food rent value voucher n family child allowance n disability social pension benefit n transfer exchange parent working cash work n transfer exchange attending health checkup family member n business recovery startup grant older child parent caafag subject condition eg business management training business plan development etc n scholarship benefit restricted certain area eg school fee school supply etc", "ProcessedSent": "n family child allowance", "SentID": 7908 }, { "ParagraphID": 2345, - "Paragraph": "As part of planning and implementing a child-sensitive approach to DDR-related interventions, CAAFAG can be provided with social protection assistance to reduce vulnerability to poverty and deprivation, promote social inclusion and child protection, and strengthen family and community resilience. This may include: \\n Multipurpose cash grants. \\n Commodity (e.g., food or rent) or value vouchers. \\n Family and child allowances. \\n Disability social pensions and benefits. \\n Transfers in exchange for a parent working (cash for work). \\n Transfers in exchange for attending health check-ups (for all family members). \\n Business recovery or start-up grants (for older children or parents of CAAFAG) subject to conditions (e.g., business management training, business plan development, etc.); and \\n Scholarship benefits restricted to certain areas (e.g., school fees, school supplies, etc.).", + "Paragraph": "As part of planning and implementing a child-sensitive approach to DDR-related interventions, CAAFAG can be provided with social protection assistance to reduce vulnerability to poverty and deprivation, promote social inclusion and child protection, and strengthen family and community resilience. This may include: \n Multipurpose cash grants. \n Commodity (e.g., food or rent) or value vouchers. \n Family and child allowances. \n Disability social pensions and benefits. \n Transfers in exchange for a parent working (cash for work). \n Transfers in exchange for attending health check-ups (for all family members). \n Business recovery or start-up grants (for older children or parents of CAAFAG) subject to conditions (e.g., business management training, business plan development, etc.); and \n Scholarship benefits restricted to certain areas (e.g., school fees, school supplies, etc.).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142374,14 +142374,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.8 Social protection assistance", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Disability social pensions and benefits.", + "Sentence": "\n Disability social pensions and benefits.", "newParagraph": "part planning implementing childsensitive approach ddrrelated intervention caafag provided social protection assistance reduce vulnerability poverty deprivation promote social inclusion child protection strengthen family community resilience may include n multipurpose cash grant n commodity eg food rent value voucher n family child allowance n disability social pension benefit n transfer exchange parent working cash work n transfer exchange attending health checkup family member n business recovery startup grant older child parent caafag subject condition eg business management training business plan development etc n scholarship benefit restricted certain area eg school fee school supply etc", "ProcessedSent": "n disability social pension benefit", "SentID": 7909 }, { "ParagraphID": 2345, - "Paragraph": "As part of planning and implementing a child-sensitive approach to DDR-related interventions, CAAFAG can be provided with social protection assistance to reduce vulnerability to poverty and deprivation, promote social inclusion and child protection, and strengthen family and community resilience. This may include: \\n Multipurpose cash grants. \\n Commodity (e.g., food or rent) or value vouchers. \\n Family and child allowances. \\n Disability social pensions and benefits. \\n Transfers in exchange for a parent working (cash for work). \\n Transfers in exchange for attending health check-ups (for all family members). \\n Business recovery or start-up grants (for older children or parents of CAAFAG) subject to conditions (e.g., business management training, business plan development, etc.); and \\n Scholarship benefits restricted to certain areas (e.g., school fees, school supplies, etc.).", + "Paragraph": "As part of planning and implementing a child-sensitive approach to DDR-related interventions, CAAFAG can be provided with social protection assistance to reduce vulnerability to poverty and deprivation, promote social inclusion and child protection, and strengthen family and community resilience. This may include: \n Multipurpose cash grants. \n Commodity (e.g., food or rent) or value vouchers. \n Family and child allowances. \n Disability social pensions and benefits. \n Transfers in exchange for a parent working (cash for work). \n Transfers in exchange for attending health check-ups (for all family members). \n Business recovery or start-up grants (for older children or parents of CAAFAG) subject to conditions (e.g., business management training, business plan development, etc.); and \n Scholarship benefits restricted to certain areas (e.g., school fees, school supplies, etc.).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142392,14 +142392,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.8 Social protection assistance", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Transfers in exchange for a parent working (cash for work).", + "Sentence": "\n Transfers in exchange for a parent working (cash for work).", "newParagraph": "part planning implementing childsensitive approach ddrrelated intervention caafag provided social protection assistance reduce vulnerability poverty deprivation promote social inclusion child protection strengthen family community resilience may include n multipurpose cash grant n commodity eg food rent value voucher n family child allowance n disability social pension benefit n transfer exchange parent working cash work n transfer exchange attending health checkup family member n business recovery startup grant older child parent caafag subject condition eg business management training business plan development etc n scholarship benefit restricted certain area eg school fee school supply etc", "ProcessedSent": "n transfer exchange parent working cash work", "SentID": 7910 }, { "ParagraphID": 2345, - "Paragraph": "As part of planning and implementing a child-sensitive approach to DDR-related interventions, CAAFAG can be provided with social protection assistance to reduce vulnerability to poverty and deprivation, promote social inclusion and child protection, and strengthen family and community resilience. This may include: \\n Multipurpose cash grants. \\n Commodity (e.g., food or rent) or value vouchers. \\n Family and child allowances. \\n Disability social pensions and benefits. \\n Transfers in exchange for a parent working (cash for work). \\n Transfers in exchange for attending health check-ups (for all family members). \\n Business recovery or start-up grants (for older children or parents of CAAFAG) subject to conditions (e.g., business management training, business plan development, etc.); and \\n Scholarship benefits restricted to certain areas (e.g., school fees, school supplies, etc.).", + "Paragraph": "As part of planning and implementing a child-sensitive approach to DDR-related interventions, CAAFAG can be provided with social protection assistance to reduce vulnerability to poverty and deprivation, promote social inclusion and child protection, and strengthen family and community resilience. This may include: \n Multipurpose cash grants. \n Commodity (e.g., food or rent) or value vouchers. \n Family and child allowances. \n Disability social pensions and benefits. \n Transfers in exchange for a parent working (cash for work). \n Transfers in exchange for attending health check-ups (for all family members). \n Business recovery or start-up grants (for older children or parents of CAAFAG) subject to conditions (e.g., business management training, business plan development, etc.); and \n Scholarship benefits restricted to certain areas (e.g., school fees, school supplies, etc.).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142410,14 +142410,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.8 Social protection assistance", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Transfers in exchange for attending health check-ups (for all family members).", + "Sentence": "\n Transfers in exchange for attending health check-ups (for all family members).", "newParagraph": "part planning implementing childsensitive approach ddrrelated intervention caafag provided social protection assistance reduce vulnerability poverty deprivation promote social inclusion child protection strengthen family community resilience may include n multipurpose cash grant n commodity eg food rent value voucher n family child allowance n disability social pension benefit n transfer exchange parent working cash work n transfer exchange attending health checkup family member n business recovery startup grant older child parent caafag subject condition eg business management training business plan development etc n scholarship benefit restricted certain area eg school fee school supply etc", "ProcessedSent": "n transfer exchange attending health checkup family member", "SentID": 7911 }, { "ParagraphID": 2345, - "Paragraph": "As part of planning and implementing a child-sensitive approach to DDR-related interventions, CAAFAG can be provided with social protection assistance to reduce vulnerability to poverty and deprivation, promote social inclusion and child protection, and strengthen family and community resilience. This may include: \\n Multipurpose cash grants. \\n Commodity (e.g., food or rent) or value vouchers. \\n Family and child allowances. \\n Disability social pensions and benefits. \\n Transfers in exchange for a parent working (cash for work). \\n Transfers in exchange for attending health check-ups (for all family members). \\n Business recovery or start-up grants (for older children or parents of CAAFAG) subject to conditions (e.g., business management training, business plan development, etc.); and \\n Scholarship benefits restricted to certain areas (e.g., school fees, school supplies, etc.).", + "Paragraph": "As part of planning and implementing a child-sensitive approach to DDR-related interventions, CAAFAG can be provided with social protection assistance to reduce vulnerability to poverty and deprivation, promote social inclusion and child protection, and strengthen family and community resilience. This may include: \n Multipurpose cash grants. \n Commodity (e.g., food or rent) or value vouchers. \n Family and child allowances. \n Disability social pensions and benefits. \n Transfers in exchange for a parent working (cash for work). \n Transfers in exchange for attending health check-ups (for all family members). \n Business recovery or start-up grants (for older children or parents of CAAFAG) subject to conditions (e.g., business management training, business plan development, etc.); and \n Scholarship benefits restricted to certain areas (e.g., school fees, school supplies, etc.).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142428,14 +142428,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.8 Social protection assistance", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Business recovery or start-up grants (for older children or parents of CAAFAG) subject to conditions (e.g., business management training, business plan development, etc.", + "Sentence": "\n Business recovery or start-up grants (for older children or parents of CAAFAG) subject to conditions (e.g., business management training, business plan development, etc.", "newParagraph": "part planning implementing childsensitive approach ddrrelated intervention caafag provided social protection assistance reduce vulnerability poverty deprivation promote social inclusion child protection strengthen family community resilience may include n multipurpose cash grant n commodity eg food rent value voucher n family child allowance n disability social pension benefit n transfer exchange parent working cash work n transfer exchange attending health checkup family member n business recovery startup grant older child parent caafag subject condition eg business management training business plan development etc n scholarship benefit restricted certain area eg school fee school supply etc", "ProcessedSent": "n business recovery startup grant older child parent caafag subject condition eg business management training business plan development etc", "SentID": 7912 }, { "ParagraphID": 2345, - "Paragraph": "As part of planning and implementing a child-sensitive approach to DDR-related interventions, CAAFAG can be provided with social protection assistance to reduce vulnerability to poverty and deprivation, promote social inclusion and child protection, and strengthen family and community resilience. This may include: \\n Multipurpose cash grants. \\n Commodity (e.g., food or rent) or value vouchers. \\n Family and child allowances. \\n Disability social pensions and benefits. \\n Transfers in exchange for a parent working (cash for work). \\n Transfers in exchange for attending health check-ups (for all family members). \\n Business recovery or start-up grants (for older children or parents of CAAFAG) subject to conditions (e.g., business management training, business plan development, etc.); and \\n Scholarship benefits restricted to certain areas (e.g., school fees, school supplies, etc.).", + "Paragraph": "As part of planning and implementing a child-sensitive approach to DDR-related interventions, CAAFAG can be provided with social protection assistance to reduce vulnerability to poverty and deprivation, promote social inclusion and child protection, and strengthen family and community resilience. This may include: \n Multipurpose cash grants. \n Commodity (e.g., food or rent) or value vouchers. \n Family and child allowances. \n Disability social pensions and benefits. \n Transfers in exchange for a parent working (cash for work). \n Transfers in exchange for attending health check-ups (for all family members). \n Business recovery or start-up grants (for older children or parents of CAAFAG) subject to conditions (e.g., business management training, business plan development, etc.); and \n Scholarship benefits restricted to certain areas (e.g., school fees, school supplies, etc.).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142446,14 +142446,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.8 Social protection assistance", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "); and \\n Scholarship benefits restricted to certain areas (e.g., school fees, school supplies, etc.", + "Sentence": "); and \n Scholarship benefits restricted to certain areas (e.g., school fees, school supplies, etc.", "newParagraph": "part planning implementing childsensitive approach ddrrelated intervention caafag provided social protection assistance reduce vulnerability poverty deprivation promote social inclusion child protection strengthen family community resilience may include n multipurpose cash grant n commodity eg food rent value voucher n family child allowance n disability social pension benefit n transfer exchange parent working cash work n transfer exchange attending health checkup family member n business recovery startup grant older child parent caafag subject condition eg business management training business plan development etc n scholarship benefit restricted certain area eg school fee school supply etc", "ProcessedSent": " n scholarship benefit restricted certain area eg school fee school supply etc", "SentID": 7913 }, { "ParagraphID": 2345, - "Paragraph": "As part of planning and implementing a child-sensitive approach to DDR-related interventions, CAAFAG can be provided with social protection assistance to reduce vulnerability to poverty and deprivation, promote social inclusion and child protection, and strengthen family and community resilience. This may include: \\n Multipurpose cash grants. \\n Commodity (e.g., food or rent) or value vouchers. \\n Family and child allowances. \\n Disability social pensions and benefits. \\n Transfers in exchange for a parent working (cash for work). \\n Transfers in exchange for attending health check-ups (for all family members). \\n Business recovery or start-up grants (for older children or parents of CAAFAG) subject to conditions (e.g., business management training, business plan development, etc.); and \\n Scholarship benefits restricted to certain areas (e.g., school fees, school supplies, etc.).", + "Paragraph": "As part of planning and implementing a child-sensitive approach to DDR-related interventions, CAAFAG can be provided with social protection assistance to reduce vulnerability to poverty and deprivation, promote social inclusion and child protection, and strengthen family and community resilience. This may include: \n Multipurpose cash grants. \n Commodity (e.g., food or rent) or value vouchers. \n Family and child allowances. \n Disability social pensions and benefits. \n Transfers in exchange for a parent working (cash for work). \n Transfers in exchange for attending health check-ups (for all family members). \n Business recovery or start-up grants (for older children or parents of CAAFAG) subject to conditions (e.g., business management training, business plan development, etc.); and \n Scholarship benefits restricted to certain areas (e.g., school fees, school supplies, etc.).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142471,7 +142471,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2346, - "Paragraph": "To ensure that assistance is child-sensitive, it must be governed by a number of guiding principles: \\n Assistance must be designed with the child\u2019s best interests in mind and necessary safeguards in place, so that cash or other material assistance does not create incentives or push\/pull factors to recruitment of children in the community or re-recruitment of the child and does not draw attention to the child. \\n Assistance must be based on findings from the situation analysis and risk assessments (see sections 6.1 and 6.2). \\n Assistance shall be targeted towards the most vulnerable CAAFAG (for example, girl mothers, persons with disabilities, and separated or unaccompanied minors) and their families. \\n Assistance shall be predictable, allowing households to plan, manage risk and invest in diverse activities. \\n Mixed delivery approaches (individual and community) should be considered, where appropriate, to strengthen conflict sensitivity. \\n Community-based approaches should be promoted when they are likely to reduce resentment, increase community acceptance of returning CAAFAG, result in local economic benefits and strengthen social reintegration outcomes. \\n Focus should be given to assistance that is multisectoral (e.g., health, education, water, sanitation and protection) and that has multiplier impacts. \\n Conditions should be placed on community grants (e.g., training, awareness-raising activities, investment in community-level income-generating activities and benefits for the children of the households engaged). \\n Investment in community structures should be promoted when these structures foster a protective environment for children (e.g., community-based child protection committees and community early warning prevention systems). \\n Risk mitigation strategies shall be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of abuse. For example, it should be ensured that distributors of assistance work in pairs, that post- distribution monitoring is carried out and that children are empowered to speak out about their rights.", + "Paragraph": "To ensure that assistance is child-sensitive, it must be governed by a number of guiding principles: \n Assistance must be designed with the child\u2019s best interests in mind and necessary safeguards in place, so that cash or other material assistance does not create incentives or push\/pull factors to recruitment of children in the community or re-recruitment of the child and does not draw attention to the child. \n Assistance must be based on findings from the situation analysis and risk assessments (see sections 6.1 and 6.2). \n Assistance shall be targeted towards the most vulnerable CAAFAG (for example, girl mothers, persons with disabilities, and separated or unaccompanied minors) and their families. \n Assistance shall be predictable, allowing households to plan, manage risk and invest in diverse activities. \n Mixed delivery approaches (individual and community) should be considered, where appropriate, to strengthen conflict sensitivity. \n Community-based approaches should be promoted when they are likely to reduce resentment, increase community acceptance of returning CAAFAG, result in local economic benefits and strengthen social reintegration outcomes. \n Focus should be given to assistance that is multisectoral (e.g., health, education, water, sanitation and protection) and that has multiplier impacts. \n Conditions should be placed on community grants (e.g., training, awareness-raising activities, investment in community-level income-generating activities and benefits for the children of the households engaged). \n Investment in community structures should be promoted when these structures foster a protective environment for children (e.g., community-based child protection committees and community early warning prevention systems). \n Risk mitigation strategies shall be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of abuse. For example, it should be ensured that distributors of assistance work in pairs, that post- distribution monitoring is carried out and that children are empowered to speak out about their rights.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142482,14 +142482,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.8 Social protection assistance", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "To ensure that assistance is child-sensitive, it must be governed by a number of guiding principles: \\n Assistance must be designed with the child\u2019s best interests in mind and necessary safeguards in place, so that cash or other material assistance does not create incentives or push\/pull factors to recruitment of children in the community or re-recruitment of the child and does not draw attention to the child.", + "Sentence": "To ensure that assistance is child-sensitive, it must be governed by a number of guiding principles: \n Assistance must be designed with the child\u2019s best interests in mind and necessary safeguards in place, so that cash or other material assistance does not create incentives or push\/pull factors to recruitment of children in the community or re-recruitment of the child and does not draw attention to the child.", "newParagraph": "ensure assistance childsensitive must governed number guiding principle n assistance must designed child best interest mind necessary safeguard place cash material assistance create incentive pushpull factor recruitment child community rerecruitment child draw attention child n assistance must based finding situation analysis risk assessment see section 61 62 n assistance shall targeted towards vulnerable caafag example girl mother person disability separated unaccompanied minor family n assistance shall predictable allowing household plan manage risk invest diverse activity n mixed delivery approach individual community considered appropriate strengthen conflict sensitivity n communitybased approach promoted likely reduce resentment increase community acceptance returning caafag result local economic benefit strengthen social reintegration outcome n focus given assistance multisectoral eg health education water sanitation protection multiplier impact n condition placed community grant eg training awarenessraising activity investment communitylevel incomegenerating activity benefit child household engaged n investment community structure promoted structure foster protective environment child eg communitybased child protection committee community early warning prevention system n risk mitigation strategy shall developed implemented reduce risk abuse example ensured distributor assistance work pair post distribution monitoring carried child empowered speak right", "ProcessedSent": "ensure assistance childsensitive must governed number guiding principle n assistance must designed child best interest mind necessary safeguard place cash material assistance create incentive pushpull factor recruitment child community rerecruitment child draw attention child", "SentID": 7915 }, { "ParagraphID": 2346, - "Paragraph": "To ensure that assistance is child-sensitive, it must be governed by a number of guiding principles: \\n Assistance must be designed with the child\u2019s best interests in mind and necessary safeguards in place, so that cash or other material assistance does not create incentives or push\/pull factors to recruitment of children in the community or re-recruitment of the child and does not draw attention to the child. \\n Assistance must be based on findings from the situation analysis and risk assessments (see sections 6.1 and 6.2). \\n Assistance shall be targeted towards the most vulnerable CAAFAG (for example, girl mothers, persons with disabilities, and separated or unaccompanied minors) and their families. \\n Assistance shall be predictable, allowing households to plan, manage risk and invest in diverse activities. \\n Mixed delivery approaches (individual and community) should be considered, where appropriate, to strengthen conflict sensitivity. \\n Community-based approaches should be promoted when they are likely to reduce resentment, increase community acceptance of returning CAAFAG, result in local economic benefits and strengthen social reintegration outcomes. \\n Focus should be given to assistance that is multisectoral (e.g., health, education, water, sanitation and protection) and that has multiplier impacts. \\n Conditions should be placed on community grants (e.g., training, awareness-raising activities, investment in community-level income-generating activities and benefits for the children of the households engaged). \\n Investment in community structures should be promoted when these structures foster a protective environment for children (e.g., community-based child protection committees and community early warning prevention systems). \\n Risk mitigation strategies shall be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of abuse. For example, it should be ensured that distributors of assistance work in pairs, that post- distribution monitoring is carried out and that children are empowered to speak out about their rights.", + "Paragraph": "To ensure that assistance is child-sensitive, it must be governed by a number of guiding principles: \n Assistance must be designed with the child\u2019s best interests in mind and necessary safeguards in place, so that cash or other material assistance does not create incentives or push\/pull factors to recruitment of children in the community or re-recruitment of the child and does not draw attention to the child. \n Assistance must be based on findings from the situation analysis and risk assessments (see sections 6.1 and 6.2). \n Assistance shall be targeted towards the most vulnerable CAAFAG (for example, girl mothers, persons with disabilities, and separated or unaccompanied minors) and their families. \n Assistance shall be predictable, allowing households to plan, manage risk and invest in diverse activities. \n Mixed delivery approaches (individual and community) should be considered, where appropriate, to strengthen conflict sensitivity. \n Community-based approaches should be promoted when they are likely to reduce resentment, increase community acceptance of returning CAAFAG, result in local economic benefits and strengthen social reintegration outcomes. \n Focus should be given to assistance that is multisectoral (e.g., health, education, water, sanitation and protection) and that has multiplier impacts. \n Conditions should be placed on community grants (e.g., training, awareness-raising activities, investment in community-level income-generating activities and benefits for the children of the households engaged). \n Investment in community structures should be promoted when these structures foster a protective environment for children (e.g., community-based child protection committees and community early warning prevention systems). \n Risk mitigation strategies shall be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of abuse. For example, it should be ensured that distributors of assistance work in pairs, that post- distribution monitoring is carried out and that children are empowered to speak out about their rights.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142500,14 +142500,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.8 Social protection assistance", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Assistance must be based on findings from the situation analysis and risk assessments (see sections 6.1 and 6.2).", + "Sentence": "\n Assistance must be based on findings from the situation analysis and risk assessments (see sections 6.1 and 6.2).", "newParagraph": "ensure assistance childsensitive must governed number guiding principle n assistance must designed child best interest mind necessary safeguard place cash material assistance create incentive pushpull factor recruitment child community rerecruitment child draw attention child n assistance must based finding situation analysis risk assessment see section 61 62 n assistance shall targeted towards vulnerable caafag example girl mother person disability separated unaccompanied minor family n assistance shall predictable allowing household plan manage risk invest diverse activity n mixed delivery approach individual community considered appropriate strengthen conflict sensitivity n communitybased approach promoted likely reduce resentment increase community acceptance returning caafag result local economic benefit strengthen social reintegration outcome n focus given assistance multisectoral eg health education water sanitation protection multiplier impact n condition placed community grant eg training awarenessraising activity investment communitylevel incomegenerating activity benefit child household engaged n investment community structure promoted structure foster protective environment child eg communitybased child protection committee community early warning prevention system n risk mitigation strategy shall developed implemented reduce risk abuse example ensured distributor assistance work pair post distribution monitoring carried child empowered speak right", "ProcessedSent": "n assistance must based finding situation analysis risk assessment see section 61 62", "SentID": 7916 }, { "ParagraphID": 2346, - "Paragraph": "To ensure that assistance is child-sensitive, it must be governed by a number of guiding principles: \\n Assistance must be designed with the child\u2019s best interests in mind and necessary safeguards in place, so that cash or other material assistance does not create incentives or push\/pull factors to recruitment of children in the community or re-recruitment of the child and does not draw attention to the child. \\n Assistance must be based on findings from the situation analysis and risk assessments (see sections 6.1 and 6.2). \\n Assistance shall be targeted towards the most vulnerable CAAFAG (for example, girl mothers, persons with disabilities, and separated or unaccompanied minors) and their families. \\n Assistance shall be predictable, allowing households to plan, manage risk and invest in diverse activities. \\n Mixed delivery approaches (individual and community) should be considered, where appropriate, to strengthen conflict sensitivity. \\n Community-based approaches should be promoted when they are likely to reduce resentment, increase community acceptance of returning CAAFAG, result in local economic benefits and strengthen social reintegration outcomes. \\n Focus should be given to assistance that is multisectoral (e.g., health, education, water, sanitation and protection) and that has multiplier impacts. \\n Conditions should be placed on community grants (e.g., training, awareness-raising activities, investment in community-level income-generating activities and benefits for the children of the households engaged). \\n Investment in community structures should be promoted when these structures foster a protective environment for children (e.g., community-based child protection committees and community early warning prevention systems). \\n Risk mitigation strategies shall be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of abuse. For example, it should be ensured that distributors of assistance work in pairs, that post- distribution monitoring is carried out and that children are empowered to speak out about their rights.", + "Paragraph": "To ensure that assistance is child-sensitive, it must be governed by a number of guiding principles: \n Assistance must be designed with the child\u2019s best interests in mind and necessary safeguards in place, so that cash or other material assistance does not create incentives or push\/pull factors to recruitment of children in the community or re-recruitment of the child and does not draw attention to the child. \n Assistance must be based on findings from the situation analysis and risk assessments (see sections 6.1 and 6.2). \n Assistance shall be targeted towards the most vulnerable CAAFAG (for example, girl mothers, persons with disabilities, and separated or unaccompanied minors) and their families. \n Assistance shall be predictable, allowing households to plan, manage risk and invest in diverse activities. \n Mixed delivery approaches (individual and community) should be considered, where appropriate, to strengthen conflict sensitivity. \n Community-based approaches should be promoted when they are likely to reduce resentment, increase community acceptance of returning CAAFAG, result in local economic benefits and strengthen social reintegration outcomes. \n Focus should be given to assistance that is multisectoral (e.g., health, education, water, sanitation and protection) and that has multiplier impacts. \n Conditions should be placed on community grants (e.g., training, awareness-raising activities, investment in community-level income-generating activities and benefits for the children of the households engaged). \n Investment in community structures should be promoted when these structures foster a protective environment for children (e.g., community-based child protection committees and community early warning prevention systems). \n Risk mitigation strategies shall be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of abuse. For example, it should be ensured that distributors of assistance work in pairs, that post- distribution monitoring is carried out and that children are empowered to speak out about their rights.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142518,14 +142518,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.8 Social protection assistance", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Assistance shall be targeted towards the most vulnerable CAAFAG (for example, girl mothers, persons with disabilities, and separated or unaccompanied minors) and their families.", + "Sentence": "\n Assistance shall be targeted towards the most vulnerable CAAFAG (for example, girl mothers, persons with disabilities, and separated or unaccompanied minors) and their families.", "newParagraph": "ensure assistance childsensitive must governed number guiding principle n assistance must designed child best interest mind necessary safeguard place cash material assistance create incentive pushpull factor recruitment child community rerecruitment child draw attention child n assistance must based finding situation analysis risk assessment see section 61 62 n assistance shall targeted towards vulnerable caafag example girl mother person disability separated unaccompanied minor family n assistance shall predictable allowing household plan manage risk invest diverse activity n mixed delivery approach individual community considered appropriate strengthen conflict sensitivity n communitybased approach promoted likely reduce resentment increase community acceptance returning caafag result local economic benefit strengthen social reintegration outcome n focus given assistance multisectoral eg health education water sanitation protection multiplier impact n condition placed community grant eg training awarenessraising activity investment communitylevel incomegenerating activity benefit child household engaged n investment community structure promoted structure foster protective environment child eg communitybased child protection committee community early warning prevention system n risk mitigation strategy shall developed implemented reduce risk abuse example ensured distributor assistance work pair post distribution monitoring carried child empowered speak right", "ProcessedSent": "n assistance shall targeted towards vulnerable caafag example girl mother person disability separated unaccompanied minor family", "SentID": 7917 }, { "ParagraphID": 2346, - "Paragraph": "To ensure that assistance is child-sensitive, it must be governed by a number of guiding principles: \\n Assistance must be designed with the child\u2019s best interests in mind and necessary safeguards in place, so that cash or other material assistance does not create incentives or push\/pull factors to recruitment of children in the community or re-recruitment of the child and does not draw attention to the child. \\n Assistance must be based on findings from the situation analysis and risk assessments (see sections 6.1 and 6.2). \\n Assistance shall be targeted towards the most vulnerable CAAFAG (for example, girl mothers, persons with disabilities, and separated or unaccompanied minors) and their families. \\n Assistance shall be predictable, allowing households to plan, manage risk and invest in diverse activities. \\n Mixed delivery approaches (individual and community) should be considered, where appropriate, to strengthen conflict sensitivity. \\n Community-based approaches should be promoted when they are likely to reduce resentment, increase community acceptance of returning CAAFAG, result in local economic benefits and strengthen social reintegration outcomes. \\n Focus should be given to assistance that is multisectoral (e.g., health, education, water, sanitation and protection) and that has multiplier impacts. \\n Conditions should be placed on community grants (e.g., training, awareness-raising activities, investment in community-level income-generating activities and benefits for the children of the households engaged). \\n Investment in community structures should be promoted when these structures foster a protective environment for children (e.g., community-based child protection committees and community early warning prevention systems). \\n Risk mitigation strategies shall be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of abuse. For example, it should be ensured that distributors of assistance work in pairs, that post- distribution monitoring is carried out and that children are empowered to speak out about their rights.", + "Paragraph": "To ensure that assistance is child-sensitive, it must be governed by a number of guiding principles: \n Assistance must be designed with the child\u2019s best interests in mind and necessary safeguards in place, so that cash or other material assistance does not create incentives or push\/pull factors to recruitment of children in the community or re-recruitment of the child and does not draw attention to the child. \n Assistance must be based on findings from the situation analysis and risk assessments (see sections 6.1 and 6.2). \n Assistance shall be targeted towards the most vulnerable CAAFAG (for example, girl mothers, persons with disabilities, and separated or unaccompanied minors) and their families. \n Assistance shall be predictable, allowing households to plan, manage risk and invest in diverse activities. \n Mixed delivery approaches (individual and community) should be considered, where appropriate, to strengthen conflict sensitivity. \n Community-based approaches should be promoted when they are likely to reduce resentment, increase community acceptance of returning CAAFAG, result in local economic benefits and strengthen social reintegration outcomes. \n Focus should be given to assistance that is multisectoral (e.g., health, education, water, sanitation and protection) and that has multiplier impacts. \n Conditions should be placed on community grants (e.g., training, awareness-raising activities, investment in community-level income-generating activities and benefits for the children of the households engaged). \n Investment in community structures should be promoted when these structures foster a protective environment for children (e.g., community-based child protection committees and community early warning prevention systems). \n Risk mitigation strategies shall be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of abuse. For example, it should be ensured that distributors of assistance work in pairs, that post- distribution monitoring is carried out and that children are empowered to speak out about their rights.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142536,14 +142536,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.8 Social protection assistance", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Assistance shall be predictable, allowing households to plan, manage risk and invest in diverse activities.", + "Sentence": "\n Assistance shall be predictable, allowing households to plan, manage risk and invest in diverse activities.", "newParagraph": "ensure assistance childsensitive must governed number guiding principle n assistance must designed child best interest mind necessary safeguard place cash material assistance create incentive pushpull factor recruitment child community rerecruitment child draw attention child n assistance must based finding situation analysis risk assessment see section 61 62 n assistance shall targeted towards vulnerable caafag example girl mother person disability separated unaccompanied minor family n assistance shall predictable allowing household plan manage risk invest diverse activity n mixed delivery approach individual community considered appropriate strengthen conflict sensitivity n communitybased approach promoted likely reduce resentment increase community acceptance returning caafag result local economic benefit strengthen social reintegration outcome n focus given assistance multisectoral eg health education water sanitation protection multiplier impact n condition placed community grant eg training awarenessraising activity investment communitylevel incomegenerating activity benefit child household engaged n investment community structure promoted structure foster protective environment child eg communitybased child protection committee community early warning prevention system n risk mitigation strategy shall developed implemented reduce risk abuse example ensured distributor assistance work pair post distribution monitoring carried child empowered speak right", "ProcessedSent": "n assistance shall predictable allowing household plan manage risk invest diverse activity", "SentID": 7918 }, { "ParagraphID": 2346, - "Paragraph": "To ensure that assistance is child-sensitive, it must be governed by a number of guiding principles: \\n Assistance must be designed with the child\u2019s best interests in mind and necessary safeguards in place, so that cash or other material assistance does not create incentives or push\/pull factors to recruitment of children in the community or re-recruitment of the child and does not draw attention to the child. \\n Assistance must be based on findings from the situation analysis and risk assessments (see sections 6.1 and 6.2). \\n Assistance shall be targeted towards the most vulnerable CAAFAG (for example, girl mothers, persons with disabilities, and separated or unaccompanied minors) and their families. \\n Assistance shall be predictable, allowing households to plan, manage risk and invest in diverse activities. \\n Mixed delivery approaches (individual and community) should be considered, where appropriate, to strengthen conflict sensitivity. \\n Community-based approaches should be promoted when they are likely to reduce resentment, increase community acceptance of returning CAAFAG, result in local economic benefits and strengthen social reintegration outcomes. \\n Focus should be given to assistance that is multisectoral (e.g., health, education, water, sanitation and protection) and that has multiplier impacts. \\n Conditions should be placed on community grants (e.g., training, awareness-raising activities, investment in community-level income-generating activities and benefits for the children of the households engaged). \\n Investment in community structures should be promoted when these structures foster a protective environment for children (e.g., community-based child protection committees and community early warning prevention systems). \\n Risk mitigation strategies shall be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of abuse. For example, it should be ensured that distributors of assistance work in pairs, that post- distribution monitoring is carried out and that children are empowered to speak out about their rights.", + "Paragraph": "To ensure that assistance is child-sensitive, it must be governed by a number of guiding principles: \n Assistance must be designed with the child\u2019s best interests in mind and necessary safeguards in place, so that cash or other material assistance does not create incentives or push\/pull factors to recruitment of children in the community or re-recruitment of the child and does not draw attention to the child. \n Assistance must be based on findings from the situation analysis and risk assessments (see sections 6.1 and 6.2). \n Assistance shall be targeted towards the most vulnerable CAAFAG (for example, girl mothers, persons with disabilities, and separated or unaccompanied minors) and their families. \n Assistance shall be predictable, allowing households to plan, manage risk and invest in diverse activities. \n Mixed delivery approaches (individual and community) should be considered, where appropriate, to strengthen conflict sensitivity. \n Community-based approaches should be promoted when they are likely to reduce resentment, increase community acceptance of returning CAAFAG, result in local economic benefits and strengthen social reintegration outcomes. \n Focus should be given to assistance that is multisectoral (e.g., health, education, water, sanitation and protection) and that has multiplier impacts. \n Conditions should be placed on community grants (e.g., training, awareness-raising activities, investment in community-level income-generating activities and benefits for the children of the households engaged). \n Investment in community structures should be promoted when these structures foster a protective environment for children (e.g., community-based child protection committees and community early warning prevention systems). \n Risk mitigation strategies shall be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of abuse. For example, it should be ensured that distributors of assistance work in pairs, that post- distribution monitoring is carried out and that children are empowered to speak out about their rights.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142554,14 +142554,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.8 Social protection assistance", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Mixed delivery approaches (individual and community) should be considered, where appropriate, to strengthen conflict sensitivity.", + "Sentence": "\n Mixed delivery approaches (individual and community) should be considered, where appropriate, to strengthen conflict sensitivity.", "newParagraph": "ensure assistance childsensitive must governed number guiding principle n assistance must designed child best interest mind necessary safeguard place cash material assistance create incentive pushpull factor recruitment child community rerecruitment child draw attention child n assistance must based finding situation analysis risk assessment see section 61 62 n assistance shall targeted towards vulnerable caafag example girl mother person disability separated unaccompanied minor family n assistance shall predictable allowing household plan manage risk invest diverse activity n mixed delivery approach individual community considered appropriate strengthen conflict sensitivity n communitybased approach promoted likely reduce resentment increase community acceptance returning caafag result local economic benefit strengthen social reintegration outcome n focus given assistance multisectoral eg health education water sanitation protection multiplier impact n condition placed community grant eg training awarenessraising activity investment communitylevel incomegenerating activity benefit child household engaged n investment community structure promoted structure foster protective environment child eg communitybased child protection committee community early warning prevention system n risk mitigation strategy shall developed implemented reduce risk abuse example ensured distributor assistance work pair post distribution monitoring carried child empowered speak right", "ProcessedSent": "n mixed delivery approach individual community considered appropriate strengthen conflict sensitivity", "SentID": 7919 }, { "ParagraphID": 2346, - "Paragraph": "To ensure that assistance is child-sensitive, it must be governed by a number of guiding principles: \\n Assistance must be designed with the child\u2019s best interests in mind and necessary safeguards in place, so that cash or other material assistance does not create incentives or push\/pull factors to recruitment of children in the community or re-recruitment of the child and does not draw attention to the child. \\n Assistance must be based on findings from the situation analysis and risk assessments (see sections 6.1 and 6.2). \\n Assistance shall be targeted towards the most vulnerable CAAFAG (for example, girl mothers, persons with disabilities, and separated or unaccompanied minors) and their families. \\n Assistance shall be predictable, allowing households to plan, manage risk and invest in diverse activities. \\n Mixed delivery approaches (individual and community) should be considered, where appropriate, to strengthen conflict sensitivity. \\n Community-based approaches should be promoted when they are likely to reduce resentment, increase community acceptance of returning CAAFAG, result in local economic benefits and strengthen social reintegration outcomes. \\n Focus should be given to assistance that is multisectoral (e.g., health, education, water, sanitation and protection) and that has multiplier impacts. \\n Conditions should be placed on community grants (e.g., training, awareness-raising activities, investment in community-level income-generating activities and benefits for the children of the households engaged). \\n Investment in community structures should be promoted when these structures foster a protective environment for children (e.g., community-based child protection committees and community early warning prevention systems). \\n Risk mitigation strategies shall be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of abuse. For example, it should be ensured that distributors of assistance work in pairs, that post- distribution monitoring is carried out and that children are empowered to speak out about their rights.", + "Paragraph": "To ensure that assistance is child-sensitive, it must be governed by a number of guiding principles: \n Assistance must be designed with the child\u2019s best interests in mind and necessary safeguards in place, so that cash or other material assistance does not create incentives or push\/pull factors to recruitment of children in the community or re-recruitment of the child and does not draw attention to the child. \n Assistance must be based on findings from the situation analysis and risk assessments (see sections 6.1 and 6.2). \n Assistance shall be targeted towards the most vulnerable CAAFAG (for example, girl mothers, persons with disabilities, and separated or unaccompanied minors) and their families. \n Assistance shall be predictable, allowing households to plan, manage risk and invest in diverse activities. \n Mixed delivery approaches (individual and community) should be considered, where appropriate, to strengthen conflict sensitivity. \n Community-based approaches should be promoted when they are likely to reduce resentment, increase community acceptance of returning CAAFAG, result in local economic benefits and strengthen social reintegration outcomes. \n Focus should be given to assistance that is multisectoral (e.g., health, education, water, sanitation and protection) and that has multiplier impacts. \n Conditions should be placed on community grants (e.g., training, awareness-raising activities, investment in community-level income-generating activities and benefits for the children of the households engaged). \n Investment in community structures should be promoted when these structures foster a protective environment for children (e.g., community-based child protection committees and community early warning prevention systems). \n Risk mitigation strategies shall be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of abuse. For example, it should be ensured that distributors of assistance work in pairs, that post- distribution monitoring is carried out and that children are empowered to speak out about their rights.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142572,14 +142572,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.8 Social protection assistance", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Community-based approaches should be promoted when they are likely to reduce resentment, increase community acceptance of returning CAAFAG, result in local economic benefits and strengthen social reintegration outcomes.", + "Sentence": "\n Community-based approaches should be promoted when they are likely to reduce resentment, increase community acceptance of returning CAAFAG, result in local economic benefits and strengthen social reintegration outcomes.", "newParagraph": "ensure assistance childsensitive must governed number guiding principle n assistance must designed child best interest mind necessary safeguard place cash material assistance create incentive pushpull factor recruitment child community rerecruitment child draw attention child n assistance must based finding situation analysis risk assessment see section 61 62 n assistance shall targeted towards vulnerable caafag example girl mother person disability separated unaccompanied minor family n assistance shall predictable allowing household plan manage risk invest diverse activity n mixed delivery approach individual community considered appropriate strengthen conflict sensitivity n communitybased approach promoted likely reduce resentment increase community acceptance returning caafag result local economic benefit strengthen social reintegration outcome n focus given assistance multisectoral eg health education water sanitation protection multiplier impact n condition placed community grant eg training awarenessraising activity investment communitylevel incomegenerating activity benefit child household engaged n investment community structure promoted structure foster protective environment child eg communitybased child protection committee community early warning prevention system n risk mitigation strategy shall developed implemented reduce risk abuse example ensured distributor assistance work pair post distribution monitoring carried child empowered speak right", "ProcessedSent": "n communitybased approach promoted likely reduce resentment increase community acceptance returning caafag result local economic benefit strengthen social reintegration outcome", "SentID": 7920 }, { "ParagraphID": 2346, - "Paragraph": "To ensure that assistance is child-sensitive, it must be governed by a number of guiding principles: \\n Assistance must be designed with the child\u2019s best interests in mind and necessary safeguards in place, so that cash or other material assistance does not create incentives or push\/pull factors to recruitment of children in the community or re-recruitment of the child and does not draw attention to the child. \\n Assistance must be based on findings from the situation analysis and risk assessments (see sections 6.1 and 6.2). \\n Assistance shall be targeted towards the most vulnerable CAAFAG (for example, girl mothers, persons with disabilities, and separated or unaccompanied minors) and their families. \\n Assistance shall be predictable, allowing households to plan, manage risk and invest in diverse activities. \\n Mixed delivery approaches (individual and community) should be considered, where appropriate, to strengthen conflict sensitivity. \\n Community-based approaches should be promoted when they are likely to reduce resentment, increase community acceptance of returning CAAFAG, result in local economic benefits and strengthen social reintegration outcomes. \\n Focus should be given to assistance that is multisectoral (e.g., health, education, water, sanitation and protection) and that has multiplier impacts. \\n Conditions should be placed on community grants (e.g., training, awareness-raising activities, investment in community-level income-generating activities and benefits for the children of the households engaged). \\n Investment in community structures should be promoted when these structures foster a protective environment for children (e.g., community-based child protection committees and community early warning prevention systems). \\n Risk mitigation strategies shall be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of abuse. For example, it should be ensured that distributors of assistance work in pairs, that post- distribution monitoring is carried out and that children are empowered to speak out about their rights.", + "Paragraph": "To ensure that assistance is child-sensitive, it must be governed by a number of guiding principles: \n Assistance must be designed with the child\u2019s best interests in mind and necessary safeguards in place, so that cash or other material assistance does not create incentives or push\/pull factors to recruitment of children in the community or re-recruitment of the child and does not draw attention to the child. \n Assistance must be based on findings from the situation analysis and risk assessments (see sections 6.1 and 6.2). \n Assistance shall be targeted towards the most vulnerable CAAFAG (for example, girl mothers, persons with disabilities, and separated or unaccompanied minors) and their families. \n Assistance shall be predictable, allowing households to plan, manage risk and invest in diverse activities. \n Mixed delivery approaches (individual and community) should be considered, where appropriate, to strengthen conflict sensitivity. \n Community-based approaches should be promoted when they are likely to reduce resentment, increase community acceptance of returning CAAFAG, result in local economic benefits and strengthen social reintegration outcomes. \n Focus should be given to assistance that is multisectoral (e.g., health, education, water, sanitation and protection) and that has multiplier impacts. \n Conditions should be placed on community grants (e.g., training, awareness-raising activities, investment in community-level income-generating activities and benefits for the children of the households engaged). \n Investment in community structures should be promoted when these structures foster a protective environment for children (e.g., community-based child protection committees and community early warning prevention systems). \n Risk mitigation strategies shall be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of abuse. For example, it should be ensured that distributors of assistance work in pairs, that post- distribution monitoring is carried out and that children are empowered to speak out about their rights.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142590,14 +142590,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.8 Social protection assistance", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Focus should be given to assistance that is multisectoral (e.g., health, education, water, sanitation and protection) and that has multiplier impacts.", + "Sentence": "\n Focus should be given to assistance that is multisectoral (e.g., health, education, water, sanitation and protection) and that has multiplier impacts.", "newParagraph": "ensure assistance childsensitive must governed number guiding principle n assistance must designed child best interest mind necessary safeguard place cash material assistance create incentive pushpull factor recruitment child community rerecruitment child draw attention child n assistance must based finding situation analysis risk assessment see section 61 62 n assistance shall targeted towards vulnerable caafag example girl mother person disability separated unaccompanied minor family n assistance shall predictable allowing household plan manage risk invest diverse activity n mixed delivery approach individual community considered appropriate strengthen conflict sensitivity n communitybased approach promoted likely reduce resentment increase community acceptance returning caafag result local economic benefit strengthen social reintegration outcome n focus given assistance multisectoral eg health education water sanitation protection multiplier impact n condition placed community grant eg training awarenessraising activity investment communitylevel incomegenerating activity benefit child household engaged n investment community structure promoted structure foster protective environment child eg communitybased child protection committee community early warning prevention system n risk mitigation strategy shall developed implemented reduce risk abuse example ensured distributor assistance work pair post distribution monitoring carried child empowered speak right", "ProcessedSent": "n focus given assistance multisectoral eg health education water sanitation protection multiplier impact", "SentID": 7921 }, { "ParagraphID": 2346, - "Paragraph": "To ensure that assistance is child-sensitive, it must be governed by a number of guiding principles: \\n Assistance must be designed with the child\u2019s best interests in mind and necessary safeguards in place, so that cash or other material assistance does not create incentives or push\/pull factors to recruitment of children in the community or re-recruitment of the child and does not draw attention to the child. \\n Assistance must be based on findings from the situation analysis and risk assessments (see sections 6.1 and 6.2). \\n Assistance shall be targeted towards the most vulnerable CAAFAG (for example, girl mothers, persons with disabilities, and separated or unaccompanied minors) and their families. \\n Assistance shall be predictable, allowing households to plan, manage risk and invest in diverse activities. \\n Mixed delivery approaches (individual and community) should be considered, where appropriate, to strengthen conflict sensitivity. \\n Community-based approaches should be promoted when they are likely to reduce resentment, increase community acceptance of returning CAAFAG, result in local economic benefits and strengthen social reintegration outcomes. \\n Focus should be given to assistance that is multisectoral (e.g., health, education, water, sanitation and protection) and that has multiplier impacts. \\n Conditions should be placed on community grants (e.g., training, awareness-raising activities, investment in community-level income-generating activities and benefits for the children of the households engaged). \\n Investment in community structures should be promoted when these structures foster a protective environment for children (e.g., community-based child protection committees and community early warning prevention systems). \\n Risk mitigation strategies shall be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of abuse. For example, it should be ensured that distributors of assistance work in pairs, that post- distribution monitoring is carried out and that children are empowered to speak out about their rights.", + "Paragraph": "To ensure that assistance is child-sensitive, it must be governed by a number of guiding principles: \n Assistance must be designed with the child\u2019s best interests in mind and necessary safeguards in place, so that cash or other material assistance does not create incentives or push\/pull factors to recruitment of children in the community or re-recruitment of the child and does not draw attention to the child. \n Assistance must be based on findings from the situation analysis and risk assessments (see sections 6.1 and 6.2). \n Assistance shall be targeted towards the most vulnerable CAAFAG (for example, girl mothers, persons with disabilities, and separated or unaccompanied minors) and their families. \n Assistance shall be predictable, allowing households to plan, manage risk and invest in diverse activities. \n Mixed delivery approaches (individual and community) should be considered, where appropriate, to strengthen conflict sensitivity. \n Community-based approaches should be promoted when they are likely to reduce resentment, increase community acceptance of returning CAAFAG, result in local economic benefits and strengthen social reintegration outcomes. \n Focus should be given to assistance that is multisectoral (e.g., health, education, water, sanitation and protection) and that has multiplier impacts. \n Conditions should be placed on community grants (e.g., training, awareness-raising activities, investment in community-level income-generating activities and benefits for the children of the households engaged). \n Investment in community structures should be promoted when these structures foster a protective environment for children (e.g., community-based child protection committees and community early warning prevention systems). \n Risk mitigation strategies shall be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of abuse. For example, it should be ensured that distributors of assistance work in pairs, that post- distribution monitoring is carried out and that children are empowered to speak out about their rights.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142608,14 +142608,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.8 Social protection assistance", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Conditions should be placed on community grants (e.g., training, awareness-raising activities, investment in community-level income-generating activities and benefits for the children of the households engaged).", + "Sentence": "\n Conditions should be placed on community grants (e.g., training, awareness-raising activities, investment in community-level income-generating activities and benefits for the children of the households engaged).", "newParagraph": "ensure assistance childsensitive must governed number guiding principle n assistance must designed child best interest mind necessary safeguard place cash material assistance create incentive pushpull factor recruitment child community rerecruitment child draw attention child n assistance must based finding situation analysis risk assessment see section 61 62 n assistance shall targeted towards vulnerable caafag example girl mother person disability separated unaccompanied minor family n assistance shall predictable allowing household plan manage risk invest diverse activity n mixed delivery approach individual community considered appropriate strengthen conflict sensitivity n communitybased approach promoted likely reduce resentment increase community acceptance returning caafag result local economic benefit strengthen social reintegration outcome n focus given assistance multisectoral eg health education water sanitation protection multiplier impact n condition placed community grant eg training awarenessraising activity investment communitylevel incomegenerating activity benefit child household engaged n investment community structure promoted structure foster protective environment child eg communitybased child protection committee community early warning prevention system n risk mitigation strategy shall developed implemented reduce risk abuse example ensured distributor assistance work pair post distribution monitoring carried child empowered speak right", "ProcessedSent": "n condition placed community grant eg training awarenessraising activity investment communitylevel incomegenerating activity benefit child household engaged", "SentID": 7922 }, { "ParagraphID": 2346, - "Paragraph": "To ensure that assistance is child-sensitive, it must be governed by a number of guiding principles: \\n Assistance must be designed with the child\u2019s best interests in mind and necessary safeguards in place, so that cash or other material assistance does not create incentives or push\/pull factors to recruitment of children in the community or re-recruitment of the child and does not draw attention to the child. \\n Assistance must be based on findings from the situation analysis and risk assessments (see sections 6.1 and 6.2). \\n Assistance shall be targeted towards the most vulnerable CAAFAG (for example, girl mothers, persons with disabilities, and separated or unaccompanied minors) and their families. \\n Assistance shall be predictable, allowing households to plan, manage risk and invest in diverse activities. \\n Mixed delivery approaches (individual and community) should be considered, where appropriate, to strengthen conflict sensitivity. \\n Community-based approaches should be promoted when they are likely to reduce resentment, increase community acceptance of returning CAAFAG, result in local economic benefits and strengthen social reintegration outcomes. \\n Focus should be given to assistance that is multisectoral (e.g., health, education, water, sanitation and protection) and that has multiplier impacts. \\n Conditions should be placed on community grants (e.g., training, awareness-raising activities, investment in community-level income-generating activities and benefits for the children of the households engaged). \\n Investment in community structures should be promoted when these structures foster a protective environment for children (e.g., community-based child protection committees and community early warning prevention systems). \\n Risk mitigation strategies shall be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of abuse. For example, it should be ensured that distributors of assistance work in pairs, that post- distribution monitoring is carried out and that children are empowered to speak out about their rights.", + "Paragraph": "To ensure that assistance is child-sensitive, it must be governed by a number of guiding principles: \n Assistance must be designed with the child\u2019s best interests in mind and necessary safeguards in place, so that cash or other material assistance does not create incentives or push\/pull factors to recruitment of children in the community or re-recruitment of the child and does not draw attention to the child. \n Assistance must be based on findings from the situation analysis and risk assessments (see sections 6.1 and 6.2). \n Assistance shall be targeted towards the most vulnerable CAAFAG (for example, girl mothers, persons with disabilities, and separated or unaccompanied minors) and their families. \n Assistance shall be predictable, allowing households to plan, manage risk and invest in diverse activities. \n Mixed delivery approaches (individual and community) should be considered, where appropriate, to strengthen conflict sensitivity. \n Community-based approaches should be promoted when they are likely to reduce resentment, increase community acceptance of returning CAAFAG, result in local economic benefits and strengthen social reintegration outcomes. \n Focus should be given to assistance that is multisectoral (e.g., health, education, water, sanitation and protection) and that has multiplier impacts. \n Conditions should be placed on community grants (e.g., training, awareness-raising activities, investment in community-level income-generating activities and benefits for the children of the households engaged). \n Investment in community structures should be promoted when these structures foster a protective environment for children (e.g., community-based child protection committees and community early warning prevention systems). \n Risk mitigation strategies shall be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of abuse. For example, it should be ensured that distributors of assistance work in pairs, that post- distribution monitoring is carried out and that children are empowered to speak out about their rights.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142626,14 +142626,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.8 Social protection assistance", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Investment in community structures should be promoted when these structures foster a protective environment for children (e.g., community-based child protection committees and community early warning prevention systems).", + "Sentence": "\n Investment in community structures should be promoted when these structures foster a protective environment for children (e.g., community-based child protection committees and community early warning prevention systems).", "newParagraph": "ensure assistance childsensitive must governed number guiding principle n assistance must designed child best interest mind necessary safeguard place cash material assistance create incentive pushpull factor recruitment child community rerecruitment child draw attention child n assistance must based finding situation analysis risk assessment see section 61 62 n assistance shall targeted towards vulnerable caafag example girl mother person disability separated unaccompanied minor family n assistance shall predictable allowing household plan manage risk invest diverse activity n mixed delivery approach individual community considered appropriate strengthen conflict sensitivity n communitybased approach promoted likely reduce resentment increase community acceptance returning caafag result local economic benefit strengthen social reintegration outcome n focus given assistance multisectoral eg health education water sanitation protection multiplier impact n condition placed community grant eg training awarenessraising activity investment communitylevel incomegenerating activity benefit child household engaged n investment community structure promoted structure foster protective environment child eg communitybased child protection committee community early warning prevention system n risk mitigation strategy shall developed implemented reduce risk abuse example ensured distributor assistance work pair post distribution monitoring carried child empowered speak right", "ProcessedSent": "n investment community structure promoted structure foster protective environment child eg communitybased child protection committee community early warning prevention system", "SentID": 7923 }, { "ParagraphID": 2346, - "Paragraph": "To ensure that assistance is child-sensitive, it must be governed by a number of guiding principles: \\n Assistance must be designed with the child\u2019s best interests in mind and necessary safeguards in place, so that cash or other material assistance does not create incentives or push\/pull factors to recruitment of children in the community or re-recruitment of the child and does not draw attention to the child. \\n Assistance must be based on findings from the situation analysis and risk assessments (see sections 6.1 and 6.2). \\n Assistance shall be targeted towards the most vulnerable CAAFAG (for example, girl mothers, persons with disabilities, and separated or unaccompanied minors) and their families. \\n Assistance shall be predictable, allowing households to plan, manage risk and invest in diverse activities. \\n Mixed delivery approaches (individual and community) should be considered, where appropriate, to strengthen conflict sensitivity. \\n Community-based approaches should be promoted when they are likely to reduce resentment, increase community acceptance of returning CAAFAG, result in local economic benefits and strengthen social reintegration outcomes. \\n Focus should be given to assistance that is multisectoral (e.g., health, education, water, sanitation and protection) and that has multiplier impacts. \\n Conditions should be placed on community grants (e.g., training, awareness-raising activities, investment in community-level income-generating activities and benefits for the children of the households engaged). \\n Investment in community structures should be promoted when these structures foster a protective environment for children (e.g., community-based child protection committees and community early warning prevention systems). \\n Risk mitigation strategies shall be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of abuse. For example, it should be ensured that distributors of assistance work in pairs, that post- distribution monitoring is carried out and that children are empowered to speak out about their rights.", + "Paragraph": "To ensure that assistance is child-sensitive, it must be governed by a number of guiding principles: \n Assistance must be designed with the child\u2019s best interests in mind and necessary safeguards in place, so that cash or other material assistance does not create incentives or push\/pull factors to recruitment of children in the community or re-recruitment of the child and does not draw attention to the child. \n Assistance must be based on findings from the situation analysis and risk assessments (see sections 6.1 and 6.2). \n Assistance shall be targeted towards the most vulnerable CAAFAG (for example, girl mothers, persons with disabilities, and separated or unaccompanied minors) and their families. \n Assistance shall be predictable, allowing households to plan, manage risk and invest in diverse activities. \n Mixed delivery approaches (individual and community) should be considered, where appropriate, to strengthen conflict sensitivity. \n Community-based approaches should be promoted when they are likely to reduce resentment, increase community acceptance of returning CAAFAG, result in local economic benefits and strengthen social reintegration outcomes. \n Focus should be given to assistance that is multisectoral (e.g., health, education, water, sanitation and protection) and that has multiplier impacts. \n Conditions should be placed on community grants (e.g., training, awareness-raising activities, investment in community-level income-generating activities and benefits for the children of the households engaged). \n Investment in community structures should be promoted when these structures foster a protective environment for children (e.g., community-based child protection committees and community early warning prevention systems). \n Risk mitigation strategies shall be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of abuse. For example, it should be ensured that distributors of assistance work in pairs, that post- distribution monitoring is carried out and that children are empowered to speak out about their rights.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142644,14 +142644,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.8 Social protection assistance", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Risk mitigation strategies shall be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of abuse.", + "Sentence": "\n Risk mitigation strategies shall be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of abuse.", "newParagraph": "ensure assistance childsensitive must governed number guiding principle n assistance must designed child best interest mind necessary safeguard place cash material assistance create incentive pushpull factor recruitment child community rerecruitment child draw attention child n assistance must based finding situation analysis risk assessment see section 61 62 n assistance shall targeted towards vulnerable caafag example girl mother person disability separated unaccompanied minor family n assistance shall predictable allowing household plan manage risk invest diverse activity n mixed delivery approach individual community considered appropriate strengthen conflict sensitivity n communitybased approach promoted likely reduce resentment increase community acceptance returning caafag result local economic benefit strengthen social reintegration outcome n focus given assistance multisectoral eg health education water sanitation protection multiplier impact n condition placed community grant eg training awarenessraising activity investment communitylevel incomegenerating activity benefit child household engaged n investment community structure promoted structure foster protective environment child eg communitybased child protection committee community early warning prevention system n risk mitigation strategy shall developed implemented reduce risk abuse example ensured distributor assistance work pair post distribution monitoring carried child empowered speak right", "ProcessedSent": "n risk mitigation strategy shall developed implemented reduce risk abuse", "SentID": 7924 }, { "ParagraphID": 2346, - "Paragraph": "To ensure that assistance is child-sensitive, it must be governed by a number of guiding principles: \\n Assistance must be designed with the child\u2019s best interests in mind and necessary safeguards in place, so that cash or other material assistance does not create incentives or push\/pull factors to recruitment of children in the community or re-recruitment of the child and does not draw attention to the child. \\n Assistance must be based on findings from the situation analysis and risk assessments (see sections 6.1 and 6.2). \\n Assistance shall be targeted towards the most vulnerable CAAFAG (for example, girl mothers, persons with disabilities, and separated or unaccompanied minors) and their families. \\n Assistance shall be predictable, allowing households to plan, manage risk and invest in diverse activities. \\n Mixed delivery approaches (individual and community) should be considered, where appropriate, to strengthen conflict sensitivity. \\n Community-based approaches should be promoted when they are likely to reduce resentment, increase community acceptance of returning CAAFAG, result in local economic benefits and strengthen social reintegration outcomes. \\n Focus should be given to assistance that is multisectoral (e.g., health, education, water, sanitation and protection) and that has multiplier impacts. \\n Conditions should be placed on community grants (e.g., training, awareness-raising activities, investment in community-level income-generating activities and benefits for the children of the households engaged). \\n Investment in community structures should be promoted when these structures foster a protective environment for children (e.g., community-based child protection committees and community early warning prevention systems). \\n Risk mitigation strategies shall be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of abuse. For example, it should be ensured that distributors of assistance work in pairs, that post- distribution monitoring is carried out and that children are empowered to speak out about their rights.", + "Paragraph": "To ensure that assistance is child-sensitive, it must be governed by a number of guiding principles: \n Assistance must be designed with the child\u2019s best interests in mind and necessary safeguards in place, so that cash or other material assistance does not create incentives or push\/pull factors to recruitment of children in the community or re-recruitment of the child and does not draw attention to the child. \n Assistance must be based on findings from the situation analysis and risk assessments (see sections 6.1 and 6.2). \n Assistance shall be targeted towards the most vulnerable CAAFAG (for example, girl mothers, persons with disabilities, and separated or unaccompanied minors) and their families. \n Assistance shall be predictable, allowing households to plan, manage risk and invest in diverse activities. \n Mixed delivery approaches (individual and community) should be considered, where appropriate, to strengthen conflict sensitivity. \n Community-based approaches should be promoted when they are likely to reduce resentment, increase community acceptance of returning CAAFAG, result in local economic benefits and strengthen social reintegration outcomes. \n Focus should be given to assistance that is multisectoral (e.g., health, education, water, sanitation and protection) and that has multiplier impacts. \n Conditions should be placed on community grants (e.g., training, awareness-raising activities, investment in community-level income-generating activities and benefits for the children of the households engaged). \n Investment in community structures should be promoted when these structures foster a protective environment for children (e.g., community-based child protection committees and community early warning prevention systems). \n Risk mitigation strategies shall be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of abuse. For example, it should be ensured that distributors of assistance work in pairs, that post- distribution monitoring is carried out and that children are empowered to speak out about their rights.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142885,7 +142885,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2350, - "Paragraph": "Civic education \\n To make the transition from military to civilian life, children need to be aware of their political rights and, eventually, responsibilities. They need to understand good citizenship, communication and teamwork, and non-violent conflict resolution methods. Ultimately, it is the child\u2019s behaviour that will facilitate successful reintegration, and preparing a child to engage socially and politically, in a productive manner, will be central to this process. Such activities can prepare them to play a socially useful role that is acknowledged by the community. Special efforts should be made to include girls in civic education training to ensure they are aware of their rights. However, children should not be forced to participate in any activities, nor used by armed or political groups to achieve specific political objectives, and their rights to free speech, opinion and privacy should be prioritized.", + "Paragraph": "Civic education \n To make the transition from military to civilian life, children need to be aware of their political rights and, eventually, responsibilities. They need to understand good citizenship, communication and teamwork, and non-violent conflict resolution methods. Ultimately, it is the child\u2019s behaviour that will facilitate successful reintegration, and preparing a child to engage socially and politically, in a productive manner, will be central to this process. Such activities can prepare them to play a socially useful role that is acknowledged by the community. Special efforts should be made to include girls in civic education training to ensure they are aware of their rights. However, children should not be forced to participate in any activities, nor used by armed or political groups to achieve specific political objectives, and their rights to free speech, opinion and privacy should be prioritized.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142896,14 +142896,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.9 Voice, participation and representation", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Civic education \\n To make the transition from military to civilian life, children need to be aware of their political rights and, eventually, responsibilities.", + "Sentence": "Civic education \n To make the transition from military to civilian life, children need to be aware of their political rights and, eventually, responsibilities.", "newParagraph": "civic education n make transition military civilian life child need aware political right eventually responsibility need understand good citizenship communication teamwork nonviolent conflict resolution method ultimately child behaviour facilitate successful reintegration preparing child engage socially politically productive manner central process activity prepare play socially useful role acknowledged community special effort made include girl civic education training ensure aware right however child forced participate activity used armed political group achieve specific political objective right free speech opinion privacy prioritized", "ProcessedSent": "civic education n make transition military civilian life child need aware political right eventually responsibility", "SentID": 7938 }, { "ParagraphID": 2350, - "Paragraph": "Civic education \\n To make the transition from military to civilian life, children need to be aware of their political rights and, eventually, responsibilities. They need to understand good citizenship, communication and teamwork, and non-violent conflict resolution methods. Ultimately, it is the child\u2019s behaviour that will facilitate successful reintegration, and preparing a child to engage socially and politically, in a productive manner, will be central to this process. Such activities can prepare them to play a socially useful role that is acknowledged by the community. Special efforts should be made to include girls in civic education training to ensure they are aware of their rights. However, children should not be forced to participate in any activities, nor used by armed or political groups to achieve specific political objectives, and their rights to free speech, opinion and privacy should be prioritized.", + "Paragraph": "Civic education \n To make the transition from military to civilian life, children need to be aware of their political rights and, eventually, responsibilities. They need to understand good citizenship, communication and teamwork, and non-violent conflict resolution methods. Ultimately, it is the child\u2019s behaviour that will facilitate successful reintegration, and preparing a child to engage socially and politically, in a productive manner, will be central to this process. Such activities can prepare them to play a socially useful role that is acknowledged by the community. Special efforts should be made to include girls in civic education training to ensure they are aware of their rights. However, children should not be forced to participate in any activities, nor used by armed or political groups to achieve specific political objectives, and their rights to free speech, opinion and privacy should be prioritized.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142921,7 +142921,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2350, - "Paragraph": "Civic education \\n To make the transition from military to civilian life, children need to be aware of their political rights and, eventually, responsibilities. They need to understand good citizenship, communication and teamwork, and non-violent conflict resolution methods. Ultimately, it is the child\u2019s behaviour that will facilitate successful reintegration, and preparing a child to engage socially and politically, in a productive manner, will be central to this process. Such activities can prepare them to play a socially useful role that is acknowledged by the community. Special efforts should be made to include girls in civic education training to ensure they are aware of their rights. However, children should not be forced to participate in any activities, nor used by armed or political groups to achieve specific political objectives, and their rights to free speech, opinion and privacy should be prioritized.", + "Paragraph": "Civic education \n To make the transition from military to civilian life, children need to be aware of their political rights and, eventually, responsibilities. They need to understand good citizenship, communication and teamwork, and non-violent conflict resolution methods. Ultimately, it is the child\u2019s behaviour that will facilitate successful reintegration, and preparing a child to engage socially and politically, in a productive manner, will be central to this process. Such activities can prepare them to play a socially useful role that is acknowledged by the community. Special efforts should be made to include girls in civic education training to ensure they are aware of their rights. However, children should not be forced to participate in any activities, nor used by armed or political groups to achieve specific political objectives, and their rights to free speech, opinion and privacy should be prioritized.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142939,7 +142939,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2350, - "Paragraph": "Civic education \\n To make the transition from military to civilian life, children need to be aware of their political rights and, eventually, responsibilities. They need to understand good citizenship, communication and teamwork, and non-violent conflict resolution methods. Ultimately, it is the child\u2019s behaviour that will facilitate successful reintegration, and preparing a child to engage socially and politically, in a productive manner, will be central to this process. Such activities can prepare them to play a socially useful role that is acknowledged by the community. Special efforts should be made to include girls in civic education training to ensure they are aware of their rights. However, children should not be forced to participate in any activities, nor used by armed or political groups to achieve specific political objectives, and their rights to free speech, opinion and privacy should be prioritized.", + "Paragraph": "Civic education \n To make the transition from military to civilian life, children need to be aware of their political rights and, eventually, responsibilities. They need to understand good citizenship, communication and teamwork, and non-violent conflict resolution methods. Ultimately, it is the child\u2019s behaviour that will facilitate successful reintegration, and preparing a child to engage socially and politically, in a productive manner, will be central to this process. Such activities can prepare them to play a socially useful role that is acknowledged by the community. Special efforts should be made to include girls in civic education training to ensure they are aware of their rights. However, children should not be forced to participate in any activities, nor used by armed or political groups to achieve specific political objectives, and their rights to free speech, opinion and privacy should be prioritized.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142957,7 +142957,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2350, - "Paragraph": "Civic education \\n To make the transition from military to civilian life, children need to be aware of their political rights and, eventually, responsibilities. They need to understand good citizenship, communication and teamwork, and non-violent conflict resolution methods. Ultimately, it is the child\u2019s behaviour that will facilitate successful reintegration, and preparing a child to engage socially and politically, in a productive manner, will be central to this process. Such activities can prepare them to play a socially useful role that is acknowledged by the community. Special efforts should be made to include girls in civic education training to ensure they are aware of their rights. However, children should not be forced to participate in any activities, nor used by armed or political groups to achieve specific political objectives, and their rights to free speech, opinion and privacy should be prioritized.", + "Paragraph": "Civic education \n To make the transition from military to civilian life, children need to be aware of their political rights and, eventually, responsibilities. They need to understand good citizenship, communication and teamwork, and non-violent conflict resolution methods. Ultimately, it is the child\u2019s behaviour that will facilitate successful reintegration, and preparing a child to engage socially and politically, in a productive manner, will be central to this process. Such activities can prepare them to play a socially useful role that is acknowledged by the community. Special efforts should be made to include girls in civic education training to ensure they are aware of their rights. However, children should not be forced to participate in any activities, nor used by armed or political groups to achieve specific political objectives, and their rights to free speech, opinion and privacy should be prioritized.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142975,7 +142975,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2350, - "Paragraph": "Civic education \\n To make the transition from military to civilian life, children need to be aware of their political rights and, eventually, responsibilities. They need to understand good citizenship, communication and teamwork, and non-violent conflict resolution methods. Ultimately, it is the child\u2019s behaviour that will facilitate successful reintegration, and preparing a child to engage socially and politically, in a productive manner, will be central to this process. Such activities can prepare them to play a socially useful role that is acknowledged by the community. Special efforts should be made to include girls in civic education training to ensure they are aware of their rights. However, children should not be forced to participate in any activities, nor used by armed or political groups to achieve specific political objectives, and their rights to free speech, opinion and privacy should be prioritized.", + "Paragraph": "Civic education \n To make the transition from military to civilian life, children need to be aware of their political rights and, eventually, responsibilities. They need to understand good citizenship, communication and teamwork, and non-violent conflict resolution methods. Ultimately, it is the child\u2019s behaviour that will facilitate successful reintegration, and preparing a child to engage socially and politically, in a productive manner, will be central to this process. Such activities can prepare them to play a socially useful role that is acknowledged by the community. Special efforts should be made to include girls in civic education training to ensure they are aware of their rights. However, children should not be forced to participate in any activities, nor used by armed or political groups to achieve specific political objectives, and their rights to free speech, opinion and privacy should be prioritized.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -142993,7 +142993,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2351, - "Paragraph": "Ensure child participants in DDR processes have a voice in local and national recovery \\n DDR processes should be aligned with national plans and strategies for recovery, the design of which should be informed by inputs from their participants. The inclusion of conflict-affected children and CAAFAG in these processes enables children to identify and advocate for specific measures of importance with regard to youth and recovery policies. Specific attention should be given to particularly vulnerable groups who may ordinarily be marginalized.", + "Paragraph": "Ensure child participants in DDR processes have a voice in local and national recovery \n DDR processes should be aligned with national plans and strategies for recovery, the design of which should be informed by inputs from their participants. The inclusion of conflict-affected children and CAAFAG in these processes enables children to identify and advocate for specific measures of importance with regard to youth and recovery policies. Specific attention should be given to particularly vulnerable groups who may ordinarily be marginalized.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -143004,14 +143004,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.9 Voice, participation and representation", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Ensure child participants in DDR processes have a voice in local and national recovery \\n DDR processes should be aligned with national plans and strategies for recovery, the design of which should be informed by inputs from their participants.", + "Sentence": "Ensure child participants in DDR processes have a voice in local and national recovery \n DDR processes should be aligned with national plans and strategies for recovery, the design of which should be informed by inputs from their participants.", "newParagraph": "ensure child participant ddr process voice local national recovery n ddr process aligned national plan strategy recovery design informed input participant inclusion conflictaffected child caafag process enables child identify advocate specific measure importance regard youth recovery policy specific attention given particularly vulnerable group may ordinarily marginalized", "ProcessedSent": "ensure child participant ddr process voice local national recovery n ddr process aligned national plan strategy recovery design informed input participant", "SentID": 7944 }, { "ParagraphID": 2351, - "Paragraph": "Ensure child participants in DDR processes have a voice in local and national recovery \\n DDR processes should be aligned with national plans and strategies for recovery, the design of which should be informed by inputs from their participants. The inclusion of conflict-affected children and CAAFAG in these processes enables children to identify and advocate for specific measures of importance with regard to youth and recovery policies. Specific attention should be given to particularly vulnerable groups who may ordinarily be marginalized.", + "Paragraph": "Ensure child participants in DDR processes have a voice in local and national recovery \n DDR processes should be aligned with national plans and strategies for recovery, the design of which should be informed by inputs from their participants. The inclusion of conflict-affected children and CAAFAG in these processes enables children to identify and advocate for specific measures of importance with regard to youth and recovery policies. Specific attention should be given to particularly vulnerable groups who may ordinarily be marginalized.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -143029,7 +143029,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2351, - "Paragraph": "Ensure child participants in DDR processes have a voice in local and national recovery \\n DDR processes should be aligned with national plans and strategies for recovery, the design of which should be informed by inputs from their participants. The inclusion of conflict-affected children and CAAFAG in these processes enables children to identify and advocate for specific measures of importance with regard to youth and recovery policies. Specific attention should be given to particularly vulnerable groups who may ordinarily be marginalized.", + "Paragraph": "Ensure child participants in DDR processes have a voice in local and national recovery \n DDR processes should be aligned with national plans and strategies for recovery, the design of which should be informed by inputs from their participants. The inclusion of conflict-affected children and CAAFAG in these processes enables children to identify and advocate for specific measures of importance with regard to youth and recovery policies. Specific attention should be given to particularly vulnerable groups who may ordinarily be marginalized.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -143047,7 +143047,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2352, - "Paragraph": "Promote the gender transformation agenda \\n Efforts to strengthen the agency of girls will only go so far in addressing gender inequality. It is also important to work with the relationships and structures present that contribute to their (dis)empowerment. It is critical to support the voice and representation of girls within their communities to enable their full reintegration and to contribute to eradication of the structural inequalities that influenced their recruitment. Working with men and boys to address male gender roles and masculine norms that promote violence is required.", + "Paragraph": "Promote the gender transformation agenda \n Efforts to strengthen the agency of girls will only go so far in addressing gender inequality. It is also important to work with the relationships and structures present that contribute to their (dis)empowerment. It is critical to support the voice and representation of girls within their communities to enable their full reintegration and to contribute to eradication of the structural inequalities that influenced their recruitment. Working with men and boys to address male gender roles and masculine norms that promote violence is required.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -143058,14 +143058,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.9 Voice, participation and representation", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Promote the gender transformation agenda \\n Efforts to strengthen the agency of girls will only go so far in addressing gender inequality.", + "Sentence": "Promote the gender transformation agenda \n Efforts to strengthen the agency of girls will only go so far in addressing gender inequality.", "newParagraph": "promote gender transformation agenda n effort strengthen agency girl go far addressing gender inequality also important work relationship structure present contribute disempowerment critical support voice representation girl within community enable full reintegration contribute eradication structural inequality influenced recruitment working men boy address male gender role masculine norm promote violence required", "ProcessedSent": "promote gender transformation agenda n effort strengthen agency girl go far addressing gender inequality", "SentID": 7947 }, { "ParagraphID": 2352, - "Paragraph": "Promote the gender transformation agenda \\n Efforts to strengthen the agency of girls will only go so far in addressing gender inequality. It is also important to work with the relationships and structures present that contribute to their (dis)empowerment. It is critical to support the voice and representation of girls within their communities to enable their full reintegration and to contribute to eradication of the structural inequalities that influenced their recruitment. Working with men and boys to address male gender roles and masculine norms that promote violence is required.", + "Paragraph": "Promote the gender transformation agenda \n Efforts to strengthen the agency of girls will only go so far in addressing gender inequality. It is also important to work with the relationships and structures present that contribute to their (dis)empowerment. It is critical to support the voice and representation of girls within their communities to enable their full reintegration and to contribute to eradication of the structural inequalities that influenced their recruitment. Working with men and boys to address male gender roles and masculine norms that promote violence is required.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -143083,7 +143083,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2352, - "Paragraph": "Promote the gender transformation agenda \\n Efforts to strengthen the agency of girls will only go so far in addressing gender inequality. It is also important to work with the relationships and structures present that contribute to their (dis)empowerment. It is critical to support the voice and representation of girls within their communities to enable their full reintegration and to contribute to eradication of the structural inequalities that influenced their recruitment. Working with men and boys to address male gender roles and masculine norms that promote violence is required.", + "Paragraph": "Promote the gender transformation agenda \n Efforts to strengthen the agency of girls will only go so far in addressing gender inequality. It is also important to work with the relationships and structures present that contribute to their (dis)empowerment. It is critical to support the voice and representation of girls within their communities to enable their full reintegration and to contribute to eradication of the structural inequalities that influenced their recruitment. Working with men and boys to address male gender roles and masculine norms that promote violence is required.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -143101,7 +143101,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2352, - "Paragraph": "Promote the gender transformation agenda \\n Efforts to strengthen the agency of girls will only go so far in addressing gender inequality. It is also important to work with the relationships and structures present that contribute to their (dis)empowerment. It is critical to support the voice and representation of girls within their communities to enable their full reintegration and to contribute to eradication of the structural inequalities that influenced their recruitment. Working with men and boys to address male gender roles and masculine norms that promote violence is required.", + "Paragraph": "Promote the gender transformation agenda \n Efforts to strengthen the agency of girls will only go so far in addressing gender inequality. It is also important to work with the relationships and structures present that contribute to their (dis)empowerment. It is critical to support the voice and representation of girls within their communities to enable their full reintegration and to contribute to eradication of the structural inequalities that influenced their recruitment. Working with men and boys to address male gender roles and masculine norms that promote violence is required.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -143119,7 +143119,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2353, - "Paragraph": "Build a collective voice \\n An inclusive programme sees community children, particularly those affected by conflict in other ways, participating in programming alongside CAAFAG. This provides an opportunity for children and youth to coordinate and advocate for greater inclusion in decision-making processes.", + "Paragraph": "Build a collective voice \n An inclusive programme sees community children, particularly those affected by conflict in other ways, participating in programming alongside CAAFAG. This provides an opportunity for children and youth to coordinate and advocate for greater inclusion in decision-making processes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -143130,14 +143130,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.9 Voice, participation and representation", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Build a collective voice \\n An inclusive programme sees community children, particularly those affected by conflict in other ways, participating in programming alongside CAAFAG.", + "Sentence": "Build a collective voice \n An inclusive programme sees community children, particularly those affected by conflict in other ways, participating in programming alongside CAAFAG.", "newParagraph": "build collective voice n inclusive programme see community child particularly affected conflict way participating programming alongside caafag provides opportunity child youth coordinate advocate greater inclusion decisionmaking process", "ProcessedSent": "build collective voice n inclusive programme see community child particularly affected conflict way participating programming alongside caafag", "SentID": 7951 }, { "ParagraphID": 2353, - "Paragraph": "Build a collective voice \\n An inclusive programme sees community children, particularly those affected by conflict in other ways, participating in programming alongside CAAFAG. This provides an opportunity for children and youth to coordinate and advocate for greater inclusion in decision-making processes.", + "Paragraph": "Build a collective voice \n An inclusive programme sees community children, particularly those affected by conflict in other ways, participating in programming alongside CAAFAG. This provides an opportunity for children and youth to coordinate and advocate for greater inclusion in decision-making processes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -143155,7 +143155,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2354, - "Paragraph": "Create children\u2019s committees across the various areas of reintegration programming \\n Children should have the opportunity to put forward their views individually and collectively. Doing so will provide a mechanism to substantively improve programme outcomes and thus ensure the best interests of the child. It also gives greater voice to other vulnerable and marginalized children in the community. Steps should be taken to ensure that girls, and especially girl mothers, are included in these committees.", + "Paragraph": "Create children\u2019s committees across the various areas of reintegration programming \n Children should have the opportunity to put forward their views individually and collectively. Doing so will provide a mechanism to substantively improve programme outcomes and thus ensure the best interests of the child. It also gives greater voice to other vulnerable and marginalized children in the community. Steps should be taken to ensure that girls, and especially girl mothers, are included in these committees.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -143166,14 +143166,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.9 Voice, participation and representation", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Create children\u2019s committees across the various areas of reintegration programming \\n Children should have the opportunity to put forward their views individually and collectively.", + "Sentence": "Create children\u2019s committees across the various areas of reintegration programming \n Children should have the opportunity to put forward their views individually and collectively.", "newParagraph": "create child committee across various area reintegration programming n child opportunity put forward view individually collectively provide mechanism substantively improve programme outcome thus ensure best interest child also give greater voice vulnerable marginalized child community step taken ensure girl especially girl mother included committee", "ProcessedSent": "create child committee across various area reintegration programming n child opportunity put forward view individually collectively", "SentID": 7953 }, { "ParagraphID": 2354, - "Paragraph": "Create children\u2019s committees across the various areas of reintegration programming \\n Children should have the opportunity to put forward their views individually and collectively. Doing so will provide a mechanism to substantively improve programme outcomes and thus ensure the best interests of the child. It also gives greater voice to other vulnerable and marginalized children in the community. Steps should be taken to ensure that girls, and especially girl mothers, are included in these committees.", + "Paragraph": "Create children\u2019s committees across the various areas of reintegration programming \n Children should have the opportunity to put forward their views individually and collectively. Doing so will provide a mechanism to substantively improve programme outcomes and thus ensure the best interests of the child. It also gives greater voice to other vulnerable and marginalized children in the community. Steps should be taken to ensure that girls, and especially girl mothers, are included in these committees.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -143191,7 +143191,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2354, - "Paragraph": "Create children\u2019s committees across the various areas of reintegration programming \\n Children should have the opportunity to put forward their views individually and collectively. Doing so will provide a mechanism to substantively improve programme outcomes and thus ensure the best interests of the child. It also gives greater voice to other vulnerable and marginalized children in the community. Steps should be taken to ensure that girls, and especially girl mothers, are included in these committees.", + "Paragraph": "Create children\u2019s committees across the various areas of reintegration programming \n Children should have the opportunity to put forward their views individually and collectively. Doing so will provide a mechanism to substantively improve programme outcomes and thus ensure the best interests of the child. It also gives greater voice to other vulnerable and marginalized children in the community. Steps should be taken to ensure that girls, and especially girl mothers, are included in these committees.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -143209,7 +143209,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2354, - "Paragraph": "Create children\u2019s committees across the various areas of reintegration programming \\n Children should have the opportunity to put forward their views individually and collectively. Doing so will provide a mechanism to substantively improve programme outcomes and thus ensure the best interests of the child. It also gives greater voice to other vulnerable and marginalized children in the community. Steps should be taken to ensure that girls, and especially girl mothers, are included in these committees.", + "Paragraph": "Create children\u2019s committees across the various areas of reintegration programming \n Children should have the opportunity to put forward their views individually and collectively. Doing so will provide a mechanism to substantively improve programme outcomes and thus ensure the best interests of the child. It also gives greater voice to other vulnerable and marginalized children in the community. Steps should be taken to ensure that girls, and especially girl mothers, are included in these committees.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -143227,7 +143227,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2355, - "Paragraph": "Encourage the participation and visibility of programme beneficiaries in public events \\n Greater participation and visibility of CAAFAG as well as non-CAAFAG will increase the opportunities for children to be involved in community processes. As community members, and community decision makers in particular, have more positive interactions with CAAFAG, they are more likely to open up space for their involvement in community affairs. However, all participation shall be voluntary, and CAAFAG should not be pushed into visible roles unless they feel comfortable occupying them.", + "Paragraph": "Encourage the participation and visibility of programme beneficiaries in public events \n Greater participation and visibility of CAAFAG as well as non-CAAFAG will increase the opportunities for children to be involved in community processes. As community members, and community decision makers in particular, have more positive interactions with CAAFAG, they are more likely to open up space for their involvement in community affairs. However, all participation shall be voluntary, and CAAFAG should not be pushed into visible roles unless they feel comfortable occupying them.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -143238,14 +143238,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.5 Reintegration", "Heading3": "8.5.9 Voice, participation and representation", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Encourage the participation and visibility of programme beneficiaries in public events \\n Greater participation and visibility of CAAFAG as well as non-CAAFAG will increase the opportunities for children to be involved in community processes.", + "Sentence": "Encourage the participation and visibility of programme beneficiaries in public events \n Greater participation and visibility of CAAFAG as well as non-CAAFAG will increase the opportunities for children to be involved in community processes.", "newParagraph": "encourage participation visibility programme beneficiary public event n greater participation visibility caafag well noncaafag increase opportunity child involved community process community member community decision maker particular positive interaction caafag likely open space involvement community affair however participation shall voluntary caafag pushed visible role unless feel comfortable occupying", "ProcessedSent": "encourage participation visibility programme beneficiary public event n greater participation visibility caafag well noncaafag increase opportunity child involved community process", "SentID": 7957 }, { "ParagraphID": 2355, - "Paragraph": "Encourage the participation and visibility of programme beneficiaries in public events \\n Greater participation and visibility of CAAFAG as well as non-CAAFAG will increase the opportunities for children to be involved in community processes. As community members, and community decision makers in particular, have more positive interactions with CAAFAG, they are more likely to open up space for their involvement in community affairs. However, all participation shall be voluntary, and CAAFAG should not be pushed into visible roles unless they feel comfortable occupying them.", + "Paragraph": "Encourage the participation and visibility of programme beneficiaries in public events \n Greater participation and visibility of CAAFAG as well as non-CAAFAG will increase the opportunities for children to be involved in community processes. As community members, and community decision makers in particular, have more positive interactions with CAAFAG, they are more likely to open up space for their involvement in community affairs. However, all participation shall be voluntary, and CAAFAG should not be pushed into visible roles unless they feel comfortable occupying them.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -143263,7 +143263,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2355, - "Paragraph": "Encourage the participation and visibility of programme beneficiaries in public events \\n Greater participation and visibility of CAAFAG as well as non-CAAFAG will increase the opportunities for children to be involved in community processes. As community members, and community decision makers in particular, have more positive interactions with CAAFAG, they are more likely to open up space for their involvement in community affairs. However, all participation shall be voluntary, and CAAFAG should not be pushed into visible roles unless they feel comfortable occupying them.", + "Paragraph": "Encourage the participation and visibility of programme beneficiaries in public events \n Greater participation and visibility of CAAFAG as well as non-CAAFAG will increase the opportunities for children to be involved in community processes. As community members, and community decision makers in particular, have more positive interactions with CAAFAG, they are more likely to open up space for their involvement in community affairs. However, all participation shall be voluntary, and CAAFAG should not be pushed into visible roles unless they feel comfortable occupying them.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145153,7 +145153,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2384, - "Paragraph": "To determine a child\u2019s age, the following are general principles: \\n If in doubt, assume the person is below 18. \\n Identification should take place as early as possible to allow them to access age-appropriate services. \\n Identification must occur before disarmament. \\n A child protection actor should be given access to disarmament sites to identify children. \\n Children should be immediately informed that they are entitled to support so that they are less likely to try to identify as adults.", + "Paragraph": "To determine a child\u2019s age, the following are general principles: \n If in doubt, assume the person is below 18. \n Identification should take place as early as possible to allow them to access age-appropriate services. \n Identification must occur before disarmament. \n A child protection actor should be given access to disarmament sites to identify children. \n Children should be immediately informed that they are entitled to support so that they are less likely to try to identify as adults.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145164,14 +145164,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "To determine a child\u2019s age, the following are general principles: \\n If in doubt, assume the person is below 18.", + "Sentence": "To determine a child\u2019s age, the following are general principles: \n If in doubt, assume the person is below 18.", "newParagraph": "determine child age following general principle n doubt assume person 18 n identification take place early possible allow access ageappropriate service n identification must occur disarmament n child protection actor given access disarmament site identify child n child immediately informed entitled support le likely try identify adult", "ProcessedSent": "determine child age following general principle n doubt assume person 18", "SentID": 8064 }, { "ParagraphID": 2384, - "Paragraph": "To determine a child\u2019s age, the following are general principles: \\n If in doubt, assume the person is below 18. \\n Identification should take place as early as possible to allow them to access age-appropriate services. \\n Identification must occur before disarmament. \\n A child protection actor should be given access to disarmament sites to identify children. \\n Children should be immediately informed that they are entitled to support so that they are less likely to try to identify as adults.", + "Paragraph": "To determine a child\u2019s age, the following are general principles: \n If in doubt, assume the person is below 18. \n Identification should take place as early as possible to allow them to access age-appropriate services. \n Identification must occur before disarmament. \n A child protection actor should be given access to disarmament sites to identify children. \n Children should be immediately informed that they are entitled to support so that they are less likely to try to identify as adults.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145182,14 +145182,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Identification should take place as early as possible to allow them to access age-appropriate services.", + "Sentence": "\n Identification should take place as early as possible to allow them to access age-appropriate services.", "newParagraph": "determine child age following general principle n doubt assume person 18 n identification take place early possible allow access ageappropriate service n identification must occur disarmament n child protection actor given access disarmament site identify child n child immediately informed entitled support le likely try identify adult", "ProcessedSent": "n identification take place early possible allow access ageappropriate service", "SentID": 8065 }, { "ParagraphID": 2384, - "Paragraph": "To determine a child\u2019s age, the following are general principles: \\n If in doubt, assume the person is below 18. \\n Identification should take place as early as possible to allow them to access age-appropriate services. \\n Identification must occur before disarmament. \\n A child protection actor should be given access to disarmament sites to identify children. \\n Children should be immediately informed that they are entitled to support so that they are less likely to try to identify as adults.", + "Paragraph": "To determine a child\u2019s age, the following are general principles: \n If in doubt, assume the person is below 18. \n Identification should take place as early as possible to allow them to access age-appropriate services. \n Identification must occur before disarmament. \n A child protection actor should be given access to disarmament sites to identify children. \n Children should be immediately informed that they are entitled to support so that they are less likely to try to identify as adults.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145200,14 +145200,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Identification must occur before disarmament.", + "Sentence": "\n Identification must occur before disarmament.", "newParagraph": "determine child age following general principle n doubt assume person 18 n identification take place early possible allow access ageappropriate service n identification must occur disarmament n child protection actor given access disarmament site identify child n child immediately informed entitled support le likely try identify adult", "ProcessedSent": "n identification must occur disarmament", "SentID": 8066 }, { "ParagraphID": 2384, - "Paragraph": "To determine a child\u2019s age, the following are general principles: \\n If in doubt, assume the person is below 18. \\n Identification should take place as early as possible to allow them to access age-appropriate services. \\n Identification must occur before disarmament. \\n A child protection actor should be given access to disarmament sites to identify children. \\n Children should be immediately informed that they are entitled to support so that they are less likely to try to identify as adults.", + "Paragraph": "To determine a child\u2019s age, the following are general principles: \n If in doubt, assume the person is below 18. \n Identification should take place as early as possible to allow them to access age-appropriate services. \n Identification must occur before disarmament. \n A child protection actor should be given access to disarmament sites to identify children. \n Children should be immediately informed that they are entitled to support so that they are less likely to try to identify as adults.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145218,14 +145218,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n A child protection actor should be given access to disarmament sites to identify children.", + "Sentence": "\n A child protection actor should be given access to disarmament sites to identify children.", "newParagraph": "determine child age following general principle n doubt assume person 18 n identification take place early possible allow access ageappropriate service n identification must occur disarmament n child protection actor given access disarmament site identify child n child immediately informed entitled support le likely try identify adult", "ProcessedSent": "n child protection actor given access disarmament site identify child", "SentID": 8067 }, { "ParagraphID": 2384, - "Paragraph": "To determine a child\u2019s age, the following are general principles: \\n If in doubt, assume the person is below 18. \\n Identification should take place as early as possible to allow them to access age-appropriate services. \\n Identification must occur before disarmament. \\n A child protection actor should be given access to disarmament sites to identify children. \\n Children should be immediately informed that they are entitled to support so that they are less likely to try to identify as adults.", + "Paragraph": "To determine a child\u2019s age, the following are general principles: \n If in doubt, assume the person is below 18. \n Identification should take place as early as possible to allow them to access age-appropriate services. \n Identification must occur before disarmament. \n A child protection actor should be given access to disarmament sites to identify children. \n Children should be immediately informed that they are entitled to support so that they are less likely to try to identify as adults.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145236,14 +145236,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Children should be immediately informed that they are entitled to support so that they are less likely to try to identify as adults.", + "Sentence": "\n Children should be immediately informed that they are entitled to support so that they are less likely to try to identify as adults.", "newParagraph": "determine child age following general principle n doubt assume person 18 n identification take place early possible allow access ageappropriate service n identification must occur disarmament n child protection actor given access disarmament site identify child n child immediately informed entitled support le likely try identify adult", "ProcessedSent": "n child immediately informed entitled support le likely try identify adult", "SentID": 8068 }, { "ParagraphID": 2385, - "Paragraph": "Considerations: \\n Interviews should be confidential. \\n Identification of children should take place before any other identification processes. \\n Children should be required to show that they can use a weapon (this is because they may have been used in a non-combat role). \\n During negotiations, children should not be counted in the number of armed forces or group (this is to avoid incentivizing child recruitment to inflate numbers). \\n The role that a person plays in the armed group should have no effect of the determination of whether the person is a child.", + "Paragraph": "Considerations: \n Interviews should be confidential. \n Identification of children should take place before any other identification processes. \n Children should be required to show that they can use a weapon (this is because they may have been used in a non-combat role). \n During negotiations, children should not be counted in the number of armed forces or group (this is to avoid incentivizing child recruitment to inflate numbers). \n The role that a person plays in the armed group should have no effect of the determination of whether the person is a child.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145254,14 +145254,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Considerations: \\n Interviews should be confidential.", + "Sentence": "Considerations: \n Interviews should be confidential.", "newParagraph": "consideration n interview confidential n identification child take place identification process n child required show use weapon may used noncombat role n negotiation child counted number armed force group avoid incentivizing child recruitment inflate number n role person play armed group effect determination whether person child", "ProcessedSent": "consideration n interview confidential", "SentID": 8069 }, { "ParagraphID": 2385, - "Paragraph": "Considerations: \\n Interviews should be confidential. \\n Identification of children should take place before any other identification processes. \\n Children should be required to show that they can use a weapon (this is because they may have been used in a non-combat role). \\n During negotiations, children should not be counted in the number of armed forces or group (this is to avoid incentivizing child recruitment to inflate numbers). \\n The role that a person plays in the armed group should have no effect of the determination of whether the person is a child.", + "Paragraph": "Considerations: \n Interviews should be confidential. \n Identification of children should take place before any other identification processes. \n Children should be required to show that they can use a weapon (this is because they may have been used in a non-combat role). \n During negotiations, children should not be counted in the number of armed forces or group (this is to avoid incentivizing child recruitment to inflate numbers). \n The role that a person plays in the armed group should have no effect of the determination of whether the person is a child.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145272,14 +145272,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Identification of children should take place before any other identification processes.", + "Sentence": "\n Identification of children should take place before any other identification processes.", "newParagraph": "consideration n interview confidential n identification child take place identification process n child required show use weapon may used noncombat role n negotiation child counted number armed force group avoid incentivizing child recruitment inflate number n role person play armed group effect determination whether person child", "ProcessedSent": "n identification child take place identification process", "SentID": 8070 }, { "ParagraphID": 2385, - "Paragraph": "Considerations: \\n Interviews should be confidential. \\n Identification of children should take place before any other identification processes. \\n Children should be required to show that they can use a weapon (this is because they may have been used in a non-combat role). \\n During negotiations, children should not be counted in the number of armed forces or group (this is to avoid incentivizing child recruitment to inflate numbers). \\n The role that a person plays in the armed group should have no effect of the determination of whether the person is a child.", + "Paragraph": "Considerations: \n Interviews should be confidential. \n Identification of children should take place before any other identification processes. \n Children should be required to show that they can use a weapon (this is because they may have been used in a non-combat role). \n During negotiations, children should not be counted in the number of armed forces or group (this is to avoid incentivizing child recruitment to inflate numbers). \n The role that a person plays in the armed group should have no effect of the determination of whether the person is a child.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145290,14 +145290,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Children should be required to show that they can use a weapon (this is because they may have been used in a non-combat role).", + "Sentence": "\n Children should be required to show that they can use a weapon (this is because they may have been used in a non-combat role).", "newParagraph": "consideration n interview confidential n identification child take place identification process n child required show use weapon may used noncombat role n negotiation child counted number armed force group avoid incentivizing child recruitment inflate number n role person play armed group effect determination whether person child", "ProcessedSent": "n child required show use weapon may used noncombat role", "SentID": 8071 }, { "ParagraphID": 2385, - "Paragraph": "Considerations: \\n Interviews should be confidential. \\n Identification of children should take place before any other identification processes. \\n Children should be required to show that they can use a weapon (this is because they may have been used in a non-combat role). \\n During negotiations, children should not be counted in the number of armed forces or group (this is to avoid incentivizing child recruitment to inflate numbers). \\n The role that a person plays in the armed group should have no effect of the determination of whether the person is a child.", + "Paragraph": "Considerations: \n Interviews should be confidential. \n Identification of children should take place before any other identification processes. \n Children should be required to show that they can use a weapon (this is because they may have been used in a non-combat role). \n During negotiations, children should not be counted in the number of armed forces or group (this is to avoid incentivizing child recruitment to inflate numbers). \n The role that a person plays in the armed group should have no effect of the determination of whether the person is a child.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145308,14 +145308,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n During negotiations, children should not be counted in the number of armed forces or group (this is to avoid incentivizing child recruitment to inflate numbers).", + "Sentence": "\n During negotiations, children should not be counted in the number of armed forces or group (this is to avoid incentivizing child recruitment to inflate numbers).", "newParagraph": "consideration n interview confidential n identification child take place identification process n child required show use weapon may used noncombat role n negotiation child counted number armed force group avoid incentivizing child recruitment inflate number n role person play armed group effect determination whether person child", "ProcessedSent": "n negotiation child counted number armed force group avoid incentivizing child recruitment inflate number", "SentID": 8072 }, { "ParagraphID": 2385, - "Paragraph": "Considerations: \\n Interviews should be confidential. \\n Identification of children should take place before any other identification processes. \\n Children should be required to show that they can use a weapon (this is because they may have been used in a non-combat role). \\n During negotiations, children should not be counted in the number of armed forces or group (this is to avoid incentivizing child recruitment to inflate numbers). \\n The role that a person plays in the armed group should have no effect of the determination of whether the person is a child.", + "Paragraph": "Considerations: \n Interviews should be confidential. \n Identification of children should take place before any other identification processes. \n Children should be required to show that they can use a weapon (this is because they may have been used in a non-combat role). \n During negotiations, children should not be counted in the number of armed forces or group (this is to avoid incentivizing child recruitment to inflate numbers). \n The role that a person plays in the armed group should have no effect of the determination of whether the person is a child.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145326,14 +145326,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The role that a person plays in the armed group should have no effect of the determination of whether the person is a child.", + "Sentence": "\n The role that a person plays in the armed group should have no effect of the determination of whether the person is a child.", "newParagraph": "consideration n interview confidential n identification child take place identification process n child required show use weapon may used noncombat role n negotiation child counted number armed force group avoid incentivizing child recruitment inflate number n role person play armed group effect determination whether person child", "ProcessedSent": "n role person play armed group effect determination whether person child", "SentID": 8073 }, { "ParagraphID": 2386, - "Paragraph": "For practitioners who are handling demobilization, Age Assessment: A Technical Note (2013) gives more detailed information on age determinations and includes the following core standards: \\n 1) An age assessment should only be requested when it is in the best interests of the child. \\n 2) Children should be given relevant information about the age assessment procedure \\n 3) Informed consent must be sought from the person whose age is being assessed before the assessment begins. \\n 4) Age assessments should only be a measure of last resort and be initiated only if a serious doubt about the person\u2019s age exists. \\n 5) Age assessments should be applied without discrimination. \\n 6) An unaccompanied or separated child should have a guardian appointed to support them through the age assessment procedure. \\n 7) Assessments must follow the least intrusive method, which upholds the dignity and physical integrity of the child at all times, and be gender and culturally appropriate \\n 8) Where there is a margin of error, this margin should be applied in favour of the child. \\n 9) Age assessments should take an holistic approach. \\n 10) A means of challenging the age determination should exist if the child wishes to contest the outcome of the assessment. \\n 11) Age assessments should only be undertaken by independent and appropriately skilled practitioners.", + "Paragraph": "For practitioners who are handling demobilization, Age Assessment: A Technical Note (2013) gives more detailed information on age determinations and includes the following core standards: \n 1) An age assessment should only be requested when it is in the best interests of the child. \n 2) Children should be given relevant information about the age assessment procedure \n 3) Informed consent must be sought from the person whose age is being assessed before the assessment begins. \n 4) Age assessments should only be a measure of last resort and be initiated only if a serious doubt about the person\u2019s age exists. \n 5) Age assessments should be applied without discrimination. \n 6) An unaccompanied or separated child should have a guardian appointed to support them through the age assessment procedure. \n 7) Assessments must follow the least intrusive method, which upholds the dignity and physical integrity of the child at all times, and be gender and culturally appropriate \n 8) Where there is a margin of error, this margin should be applied in favour of the child. \n 9) Age assessments should take an holistic approach. \n 10) A means of challenging the age determination should exist if the child wishes to contest the outcome of the assessment. \n 11) Age assessments should only be undertaken by independent and appropriately skilled practitioners.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145344,14 +145344,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "For practitioners who are handling demobilization, Age Assessment: A Technical Note (2013) gives more detailed information on age determinations and includes the following core standards: \\n 1) An age assessment should only be requested when it is in the best interests of the child.", + "Sentence": "For practitioners who are handling demobilization, Age Assessment: A Technical Note (2013) gives more detailed information on age determinations and includes the following core standards: \n 1) An age assessment should only be requested when it is in the best interests of the child.", "newParagraph": "practitioner handling demobilization age assessment technical note 2013 give detailed information age determination includes following core standard n 1 age assessment requested best interest child n 2 child given relevant information age assessment procedure n 3 informed consent must sought person whose age assessed assessment begin n 4 age assessment measure last resort initiated serious doubt person age exists n 5 age assessment applied without discrimination n 6 unaccompanied separated child guardian appointed support age assessment procedure n 7 assessment must follow least intrusive method upholds dignity physical integrity child time gender culturally appropriate n 8 margin error margin applied favour child n 9 age assessment take holistic approach n 10 mean challenging age determination exist child wish contest outcome assessment n 11 age assessment undertaken independent appropriately skilled practitioner", "ProcessedSent": "practitioner handling demobilization age assessment technical note 2013 give detailed information age determination includes following core standard n 1 age assessment requested best interest child", "SentID": 8074 }, { "ParagraphID": 2386, - "Paragraph": "For practitioners who are handling demobilization, Age Assessment: A Technical Note (2013) gives more detailed information on age determinations and includes the following core standards: \\n 1) An age assessment should only be requested when it is in the best interests of the child. \\n 2) Children should be given relevant information about the age assessment procedure \\n 3) Informed consent must be sought from the person whose age is being assessed before the assessment begins. \\n 4) Age assessments should only be a measure of last resort and be initiated only if a serious doubt about the person\u2019s age exists. \\n 5) Age assessments should be applied without discrimination. \\n 6) An unaccompanied or separated child should have a guardian appointed to support them through the age assessment procedure. \\n 7) Assessments must follow the least intrusive method, which upholds the dignity and physical integrity of the child at all times, and be gender and culturally appropriate \\n 8) Where there is a margin of error, this margin should be applied in favour of the child. \\n 9) Age assessments should take an holistic approach. \\n 10) A means of challenging the age determination should exist if the child wishes to contest the outcome of the assessment. \\n 11) Age assessments should only be undertaken by independent and appropriately skilled practitioners.", + "Paragraph": "For practitioners who are handling demobilization, Age Assessment: A Technical Note (2013) gives more detailed information on age determinations and includes the following core standards: \n 1) An age assessment should only be requested when it is in the best interests of the child. \n 2) Children should be given relevant information about the age assessment procedure \n 3) Informed consent must be sought from the person whose age is being assessed before the assessment begins. \n 4) Age assessments should only be a measure of last resort and be initiated only if a serious doubt about the person\u2019s age exists. \n 5) Age assessments should be applied without discrimination. \n 6) An unaccompanied or separated child should have a guardian appointed to support them through the age assessment procedure. \n 7) Assessments must follow the least intrusive method, which upholds the dignity and physical integrity of the child at all times, and be gender and culturally appropriate \n 8) Where there is a margin of error, this margin should be applied in favour of the child. \n 9) Age assessments should take an holistic approach. \n 10) A means of challenging the age determination should exist if the child wishes to contest the outcome of the assessment. \n 11) Age assessments should only be undertaken by independent and appropriately skilled practitioners.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145362,14 +145362,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 2) Children should be given relevant information about the age assessment procedure \\n 3) Informed consent must be sought from the person whose age is being assessed before the assessment begins.", + "Sentence": "\n 2) Children should be given relevant information about the age assessment procedure \n 3) Informed consent must be sought from the person whose age is being assessed before the assessment begins.", "newParagraph": "practitioner handling demobilization age assessment technical note 2013 give detailed information age determination includes following core standard n 1 age assessment requested best interest child n 2 child given relevant information age assessment procedure n 3 informed consent must sought person whose age assessed assessment begin n 4 age assessment measure last resort initiated serious doubt person age exists n 5 age assessment applied without discrimination n 6 unaccompanied separated child guardian appointed support age assessment procedure n 7 assessment must follow least intrusive method upholds dignity physical integrity child time gender culturally appropriate n 8 margin error margin applied favour child n 9 age assessment take holistic approach n 10 mean challenging age determination exist child wish contest outcome assessment n 11 age assessment undertaken independent appropriately skilled practitioner", "ProcessedSent": "n 2 child given relevant information age assessment procedure n 3 informed consent must sought person whose age assessed assessment begin", "SentID": 8075 }, { "ParagraphID": 2386, - "Paragraph": "For practitioners who are handling demobilization, Age Assessment: A Technical Note (2013) gives more detailed information on age determinations and includes the following core standards: \\n 1) An age assessment should only be requested when it is in the best interests of the child. \\n 2) Children should be given relevant information about the age assessment procedure \\n 3) Informed consent must be sought from the person whose age is being assessed before the assessment begins. \\n 4) Age assessments should only be a measure of last resort and be initiated only if a serious doubt about the person\u2019s age exists. \\n 5) Age assessments should be applied without discrimination. \\n 6) An unaccompanied or separated child should have a guardian appointed to support them through the age assessment procedure. \\n 7) Assessments must follow the least intrusive method, which upholds the dignity and physical integrity of the child at all times, and be gender and culturally appropriate \\n 8) Where there is a margin of error, this margin should be applied in favour of the child. \\n 9) Age assessments should take an holistic approach. \\n 10) A means of challenging the age determination should exist if the child wishes to contest the outcome of the assessment. \\n 11) Age assessments should only be undertaken by independent and appropriately skilled practitioners.", + "Paragraph": "For practitioners who are handling demobilization, Age Assessment: A Technical Note (2013) gives more detailed information on age determinations and includes the following core standards: \n 1) An age assessment should only be requested when it is in the best interests of the child. \n 2) Children should be given relevant information about the age assessment procedure \n 3) Informed consent must be sought from the person whose age is being assessed before the assessment begins. \n 4) Age assessments should only be a measure of last resort and be initiated only if a serious doubt about the person\u2019s age exists. \n 5) Age assessments should be applied without discrimination. \n 6) An unaccompanied or separated child should have a guardian appointed to support them through the age assessment procedure. \n 7) Assessments must follow the least intrusive method, which upholds the dignity and physical integrity of the child at all times, and be gender and culturally appropriate \n 8) Where there is a margin of error, this margin should be applied in favour of the child. \n 9) Age assessments should take an holistic approach. \n 10) A means of challenging the age determination should exist if the child wishes to contest the outcome of the assessment. \n 11) Age assessments should only be undertaken by independent and appropriately skilled practitioners.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145380,14 +145380,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 4) Age assessments should only be a measure of last resort and be initiated only if a serious doubt about the person\u2019s age exists.", + "Sentence": "\n 4) Age assessments should only be a measure of last resort and be initiated only if a serious doubt about the person\u2019s age exists.", "newParagraph": "practitioner handling demobilization age assessment technical note 2013 give detailed information age determination includes following core standard n 1 age assessment requested best interest child n 2 child given relevant information age assessment procedure n 3 informed consent must sought person whose age assessed assessment begin n 4 age assessment measure last resort initiated serious doubt person age exists n 5 age assessment applied without discrimination n 6 unaccompanied separated child guardian appointed support age assessment procedure n 7 assessment must follow least intrusive method upholds dignity physical integrity child time gender culturally appropriate n 8 margin error margin applied favour child n 9 age assessment take holistic approach n 10 mean challenging age determination exist child wish contest outcome assessment n 11 age assessment undertaken independent appropriately skilled practitioner", "ProcessedSent": "n 4 age assessment measure last resort initiated serious doubt person age exists", "SentID": 8076 }, { "ParagraphID": 2386, - "Paragraph": "For practitioners who are handling demobilization, Age Assessment: A Technical Note (2013) gives more detailed information on age determinations and includes the following core standards: \\n 1) An age assessment should only be requested when it is in the best interests of the child. \\n 2) Children should be given relevant information about the age assessment procedure \\n 3) Informed consent must be sought from the person whose age is being assessed before the assessment begins. \\n 4) Age assessments should only be a measure of last resort and be initiated only if a serious doubt about the person\u2019s age exists. \\n 5) Age assessments should be applied without discrimination. \\n 6) An unaccompanied or separated child should have a guardian appointed to support them through the age assessment procedure. \\n 7) Assessments must follow the least intrusive method, which upholds the dignity and physical integrity of the child at all times, and be gender and culturally appropriate \\n 8) Where there is a margin of error, this margin should be applied in favour of the child. \\n 9) Age assessments should take an holistic approach. \\n 10) A means of challenging the age determination should exist if the child wishes to contest the outcome of the assessment. \\n 11) Age assessments should only be undertaken by independent and appropriately skilled practitioners.", + "Paragraph": "For practitioners who are handling demobilization, Age Assessment: A Technical Note (2013) gives more detailed information on age determinations and includes the following core standards: \n 1) An age assessment should only be requested when it is in the best interests of the child. \n 2) Children should be given relevant information about the age assessment procedure \n 3) Informed consent must be sought from the person whose age is being assessed before the assessment begins. \n 4) Age assessments should only be a measure of last resort and be initiated only if a serious doubt about the person\u2019s age exists. \n 5) Age assessments should be applied without discrimination. \n 6) An unaccompanied or separated child should have a guardian appointed to support them through the age assessment procedure. \n 7) Assessments must follow the least intrusive method, which upholds the dignity and physical integrity of the child at all times, and be gender and culturally appropriate \n 8) Where there is a margin of error, this margin should be applied in favour of the child. \n 9) Age assessments should take an holistic approach. \n 10) A means of challenging the age determination should exist if the child wishes to contest the outcome of the assessment. \n 11) Age assessments should only be undertaken by independent and appropriately skilled practitioners.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145398,14 +145398,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 5) Age assessments should be applied without discrimination.", + "Sentence": "\n 5) Age assessments should be applied without discrimination.", "newParagraph": "practitioner handling demobilization age assessment technical note 2013 give detailed information age determination includes following core standard n 1 age assessment requested best interest child n 2 child given relevant information age assessment procedure n 3 informed consent must sought person whose age assessed assessment begin n 4 age assessment measure last resort initiated serious doubt person age exists n 5 age assessment applied without discrimination n 6 unaccompanied separated child guardian appointed support age assessment procedure n 7 assessment must follow least intrusive method upholds dignity physical integrity child time gender culturally appropriate n 8 margin error margin applied favour child n 9 age assessment take holistic approach n 10 mean challenging age determination exist child wish contest outcome assessment n 11 age assessment undertaken independent appropriately skilled practitioner", "ProcessedSent": "n 5 age assessment applied without discrimination", "SentID": 8077 }, { "ParagraphID": 2386, - "Paragraph": "For practitioners who are handling demobilization, Age Assessment: A Technical Note (2013) gives more detailed information on age determinations and includes the following core standards: \\n 1) An age assessment should only be requested when it is in the best interests of the child. \\n 2) Children should be given relevant information about the age assessment procedure \\n 3) Informed consent must be sought from the person whose age is being assessed before the assessment begins. \\n 4) Age assessments should only be a measure of last resort and be initiated only if a serious doubt about the person\u2019s age exists. \\n 5) Age assessments should be applied without discrimination. \\n 6) An unaccompanied or separated child should have a guardian appointed to support them through the age assessment procedure. \\n 7) Assessments must follow the least intrusive method, which upholds the dignity and physical integrity of the child at all times, and be gender and culturally appropriate \\n 8) Where there is a margin of error, this margin should be applied in favour of the child. \\n 9) Age assessments should take an holistic approach. \\n 10) A means of challenging the age determination should exist if the child wishes to contest the outcome of the assessment. \\n 11) Age assessments should only be undertaken by independent and appropriately skilled practitioners.", + "Paragraph": "For practitioners who are handling demobilization, Age Assessment: A Technical Note (2013) gives more detailed information on age determinations and includes the following core standards: \n 1) An age assessment should only be requested when it is in the best interests of the child. \n 2) Children should be given relevant information about the age assessment procedure \n 3) Informed consent must be sought from the person whose age is being assessed before the assessment begins. \n 4) Age assessments should only be a measure of last resort and be initiated only if a serious doubt about the person\u2019s age exists. \n 5) Age assessments should be applied without discrimination. \n 6) An unaccompanied or separated child should have a guardian appointed to support them through the age assessment procedure. \n 7) Assessments must follow the least intrusive method, which upholds the dignity and physical integrity of the child at all times, and be gender and culturally appropriate \n 8) Where there is a margin of error, this margin should be applied in favour of the child. \n 9) Age assessments should take an holistic approach. \n 10) A means of challenging the age determination should exist if the child wishes to contest the outcome of the assessment. \n 11) Age assessments should only be undertaken by independent and appropriately skilled practitioners.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145416,14 +145416,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 6) An unaccompanied or separated child should have a guardian appointed to support them through the age assessment procedure.", + "Sentence": "\n 6) An unaccompanied or separated child should have a guardian appointed to support them through the age assessment procedure.", "newParagraph": "practitioner handling demobilization age assessment technical note 2013 give detailed information age determination includes following core standard n 1 age assessment requested best interest child n 2 child given relevant information age assessment procedure n 3 informed consent must sought person whose age assessed assessment begin n 4 age assessment measure last resort initiated serious doubt person age exists n 5 age assessment applied without discrimination n 6 unaccompanied separated child guardian appointed support age assessment procedure n 7 assessment must follow least intrusive method upholds dignity physical integrity child time gender culturally appropriate n 8 margin error margin applied favour child n 9 age assessment take holistic approach n 10 mean challenging age determination exist child wish contest outcome assessment n 11 age assessment undertaken independent appropriately skilled practitioner", "ProcessedSent": "n 6 unaccompanied separated child guardian appointed support age assessment procedure", "SentID": 8078 }, { "ParagraphID": 2386, - "Paragraph": "For practitioners who are handling demobilization, Age Assessment: A Technical Note (2013) gives more detailed information on age determinations and includes the following core standards: \\n 1) An age assessment should only be requested when it is in the best interests of the child. \\n 2) Children should be given relevant information about the age assessment procedure \\n 3) Informed consent must be sought from the person whose age is being assessed before the assessment begins. \\n 4) Age assessments should only be a measure of last resort and be initiated only if a serious doubt about the person\u2019s age exists. \\n 5) Age assessments should be applied without discrimination. \\n 6) An unaccompanied or separated child should have a guardian appointed to support them through the age assessment procedure. \\n 7) Assessments must follow the least intrusive method, which upholds the dignity and physical integrity of the child at all times, and be gender and culturally appropriate \\n 8) Where there is a margin of error, this margin should be applied in favour of the child. \\n 9) Age assessments should take an holistic approach. \\n 10) A means of challenging the age determination should exist if the child wishes to contest the outcome of the assessment. \\n 11) Age assessments should only be undertaken by independent and appropriately skilled practitioners.", + "Paragraph": "For practitioners who are handling demobilization, Age Assessment: A Technical Note (2013) gives more detailed information on age determinations and includes the following core standards: \n 1) An age assessment should only be requested when it is in the best interests of the child. \n 2) Children should be given relevant information about the age assessment procedure \n 3) Informed consent must be sought from the person whose age is being assessed before the assessment begins. \n 4) Age assessments should only be a measure of last resort and be initiated only if a serious doubt about the person\u2019s age exists. \n 5) Age assessments should be applied without discrimination. \n 6) An unaccompanied or separated child should have a guardian appointed to support them through the age assessment procedure. \n 7) Assessments must follow the least intrusive method, which upholds the dignity and physical integrity of the child at all times, and be gender and culturally appropriate \n 8) Where there is a margin of error, this margin should be applied in favour of the child. \n 9) Age assessments should take an holistic approach. \n 10) A means of challenging the age determination should exist if the child wishes to contest the outcome of the assessment. \n 11) Age assessments should only be undertaken by independent and appropriately skilled practitioners.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145434,14 +145434,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 7) Assessments must follow the least intrusive method, which upholds the dignity and physical integrity of the child at all times, and be gender and culturally appropriate \\n 8) Where there is a margin of error, this margin should be applied in favour of the child.", + "Sentence": "\n 7) Assessments must follow the least intrusive method, which upholds the dignity and physical integrity of the child at all times, and be gender and culturally appropriate \n 8) Where there is a margin of error, this margin should be applied in favour of the child.", "newParagraph": "practitioner handling demobilization age assessment technical note 2013 give detailed information age determination includes following core standard n 1 age assessment requested best interest child n 2 child given relevant information age assessment procedure n 3 informed consent must sought person whose age assessed assessment begin n 4 age assessment measure last resort initiated serious doubt person age exists n 5 age assessment applied without discrimination n 6 unaccompanied separated child guardian appointed support age assessment procedure n 7 assessment must follow least intrusive method upholds dignity physical integrity child time gender culturally appropriate n 8 margin error margin applied favour child n 9 age assessment take holistic approach n 10 mean challenging age determination exist child wish contest outcome assessment n 11 age assessment undertaken independent appropriately skilled practitioner", "ProcessedSent": "n 7 assessment must follow least intrusive method upholds dignity physical integrity child time gender culturally appropriate n 8 margin error margin applied favour child", "SentID": 8079 }, { "ParagraphID": 2386, - "Paragraph": "For practitioners who are handling demobilization, Age Assessment: A Technical Note (2013) gives more detailed information on age determinations and includes the following core standards: \\n 1) An age assessment should only be requested when it is in the best interests of the child. \\n 2) Children should be given relevant information about the age assessment procedure \\n 3) Informed consent must be sought from the person whose age is being assessed before the assessment begins. \\n 4) Age assessments should only be a measure of last resort and be initiated only if a serious doubt about the person\u2019s age exists. \\n 5) Age assessments should be applied without discrimination. \\n 6) An unaccompanied or separated child should have a guardian appointed to support them through the age assessment procedure. \\n 7) Assessments must follow the least intrusive method, which upholds the dignity and physical integrity of the child at all times, and be gender and culturally appropriate \\n 8) Where there is a margin of error, this margin should be applied in favour of the child. \\n 9) Age assessments should take an holistic approach. \\n 10) A means of challenging the age determination should exist if the child wishes to contest the outcome of the assessment. \\n 11) Age assessments should only be undertaken by independent and appropriately skilled practitioners.", + "Paragraph": "For practitioners who are handling demobilization, Age Assessment: A Technical Note (2013) gives more detailed information on age determinations and includes the following core standards: \n 1) An age assessment should only be requested when it is in the best interests of the child. \n 2) Children should be given relevant information about the age assessment procedure \n 3) Informed consent must be sought from the person whose age is being assessed before the assessment begins. \n 4) Age assessments should only be a measure of last resort and be initiated only if a serious doubt about the person\u2019s age exists. \n 5) Age assessments should be applied without discrimination. \n 6) An unaccompanied or separated child should have a guardian appointed to support them through the age assessment procedure. \n 7) Assessments must follow the least intrusive method, which upholds the dignity and physical integrity of the child at all times, and be gender and culturally appropriate \n 8) Where there is a margin of error, this margin should be applied in favour of the child. \n 9) Age assessments should take an holistic approach. \n 10) A means of challenging the age determination should exist if the child wishes to contest the outcome of the assessment. \n 11) Age assessments should only be undertaken by independent and appropriately skilled practitioners.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145452,14 +145452,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 9) Age assessments should take an holistic approach.", + "Sentence": "\n 9) Age assessments should take an holistic approach.", "newParagraph": "practitioner handling demobilization age assessment technical note 2013 give detailed information age determination includes following core standard n 1 age assessment requested best interest child n 2 child given relevant information age assessment procedure n 3 informed consent must sought person whose age assessed assessment begin n 4 age assessment measure last resort initiated serious doubt person age exists n 5 age assessment applied without discrimination n 6 unaccompanied separated child guardian appointed support age assessment procedure n 7 assessment must follow least intrusive method upholds dignity physical integrity child time gender culturally appropriate n 8 margin error margin applied favour child n 9 age assessment take holistic approach n 10 mean challenging age determination exist child wish contest outcome assessment n 11 age assessment undertaken independent appropriately skilled practitioner", "ProcessedSent": "n 9 age assessment take holistic approach", "SentID": 8080 }, { "ParagraphID": 2386, - "Paragraph": "For practitioners who are handling demobilization, Age Assessment: A Technical Note (2013) gives more detailed information on age determinations and includes the following core standards: \\n 1) An age assessment should only be requested when it is in the best interests of the child. \\n 2) Children should be given relevant information about the age assessment procedure \\n 3) Informed consent must be sought from the person whose age is being assessed before the assessment begins. \\n 4) Age assessments should only be a measure of last resort and be initiated only if a serious doubt about the person\u2019s age exists. \\n 5) Age assessments should be applied without discrimination. \\n 6) An unaccompanied or separated child should have a guardian appointed to support them through the age assessment procedure. \\n 7) Assessments must follow the least intrusive method, which upholds the dignity and physical integrity of the child at all times, and be gender and culturally appropriate \\n 8) Where there is a margin of error, this margin should be applied in favour of the child. \\n 9) Age assessments should take an holistic approach. \\n 10) A means of challenging the age determination should exist if the child wishes to contest the outcome of the assessment. \\n 11) Age assessments should only be undertaken by independent and appropriately skilled practitioners.", + "Paragraph": "For practitioners who are handling demobilization, Age Assessment: A Technical Note (2013) gives more detailed information on age determinations and includes the following core standards: \n 1) An age assessment should only be requested when it is in the best interests of the child. \n 2) Children should be given relevant information about the age assessment procedure \n 3) Informed consent must be sought from the person whose age is being assessed before the assessment begins. \n 4) Age assessments should only be a measure of last resort and be initiated only if a serious doubt about the person\u2019s age exists. \n 5) Age assessments should be applied without discrimination. \n 6) An unaccompanied or separated child should have a guardian appointed to support them through the age assessment procedure. \n 7) Assessments must follow the least intrusive method, which upholds the dignity and physical integrity of the child at all times, and be gender and culturally appropriate \n 8) Where there is a margin of error, this margin should be applied in favour of the child. \n 9) Age assessments should take an holistic approach. \n 10) A means of challenging the age determination should exist if the child wishes to contest the outcome of the assessment. \n 11) Age assessments should only be undertaken by independent and appropriately skilled practitioners.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145470,14 +145470,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 10) A means of challenging the age determination should exist if the child wishes to contest the outcome of the assessment.", + "Sentence": "\n 10) A means of challenging the age determination should exist if the child wishes to contest the outcome of the assessment.", "newParagraph": "practitioner handling demobilization age assessment technical note 2013 give detailed information age determination includes following core standard n 1 age assessment requested best interest child n 2 child given relevant information age assessment procedure n 3 informed consent must sought person whose age assessed assessment begin n 4 age assessment measure last resort initiated serious doubt person age exists n 5 age assessment applied without discrimination n 6 unaccompanied separated child guardian appointed support age assessment procedure n 7 assessment must follow least intrusive method upholds dignity physical integrity child time gender culturally appropriate n 8 margin error margin applied favour child n 9 age assessment take holistic approach n 10 mean challenging age determination exist child wish contest outcome assessment n 11 age assessment undertaken independent appropriately skilled practitioner", "ProcessedSent": "n 10 mean challenging age determination exist child wish contest outcome assessment", "SentID": 8081 }, { "ParagraphID": 2386, - "Paragraph": "For practitioners who are handling demobilization, Age Assessment: A Technical Note (2013) gives more detailed information on age determinations and includes the following core standards: \\n 1) An age assessment should only be requested when it is in the best interests of the child. \\n 2) Children should be given relevant information about the age assessment procedure \\n 3) Informed consent must be sought from the person whose age is being assessed before the assessment begins. \\n 4) Age assessments should only be a measure of last resort and be initiated only if a serious doubt about the person\u2019s age exists. \\n 5) Age assessments should be applied without discrimination. \\n 6) An unaccompanied or separated child should have a guardian appointed to support them through the age assessment procedure. \\n 7) Assessments must follow the least intrusive method, which upholds the dignity and physical integrity of the child at all times, and be gender and culturally appropriate \\n 8) Where there is a margin of error, this margin should be applied in favour of the child. \\n 9) Age assessments should take an holistic approach. \\n 10) A means of challenging the age determination should exist if the child wishes to contest the outcome of the assessment. \\n 11) Age assessments should only be undertaken by independent and appropriately skilled practitioners.", + "Paragraph": "For practitioners who are handling demobilization, Age Assessment: A Technical Note (2013) gives more detailed information on age determinations and includes the following core standards: \n 1) An age assessment should only be requested when it is in the best interests of the child. \n 2) Children should be given relevant information about the age assessment procedure \n 3) Informed consent must be sought from the person whose age is being assessed before the assessment begins. \n 4) Age assessments should only be a measure of last resort and be initiated only if a serious doubt about the person\u2019s age exists. \n 5) Age assessments should be applied without discrimination. \n 6) An unaccompanied or separated child should have a guardian appointed to support them through the age assessment procedure. \n 7) Assessments must follow the least intrusive method, which upholds the dignity and physical integrity of the child at all times, and be gender and culturally appropriate \n 8) Where there is a margin of error, this margin should be applied in favour of the child. \n 9) Age assessments should take an holistic approach. \n 10) A means of challenging the age determination should exist if the child wishes to contest the outcome of the assessment. \n 11) Age assessments should only be undertaken by independent and appropriately skilled practitioners.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145488,14 +145488,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 11) Age assessments should only be undertaken by independent and appropriately skilled practitioners.", + "Sentence": "\n 11) Age assessments should only be undertaken by independent and appropriately skilled practitioners.", "newParagraph": "practitioner handling demobilization age assessment technical note 2013 give detailed information age determination includes following core standard n 1 age assessment requested best interest child n 2 child given relevant information age assessment procedure n 3 informed consent must sought person whose age assessed assessment begin n 4 age assessment measure last resort initiated serious doubt person age exists n 5 age assessment applied without discrimination n 6 unaccompanied separated child guardian appointed support age assessment procedure n 7 assessment must follow least intrusive method upholds dignity physical integrity child time gender culturally appropriate n 8 margin error margin applied favour child n 9 age assessment take holistic approach n 10 mean challenging age determination exist child wish contest outcome assessment n 11 age assessment undertaken independent appropriately skilled practitioner", "ProcessedSent": "n 11 age assessment undertaken independent appropriately skilled practitioner", "SentID": 8082 }, { "ParagraphID": 2387, - "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \\n\\n Pre-procedure: \\n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \\n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \\n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \\n\\n During the Procedure \\n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \\n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \\n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \\n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \\n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \\n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \\n\\n Post procedure \\n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \\n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \\n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \\n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", + "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \n\n Pre-procedure: \n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \n\n During the Procedure \n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \n\n Post procedure \n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145506,14 +145506,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \\n\\n Pre-procedure: \\n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure.", + "Sentence": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \n\n Pre-procedure: \n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure.", "newParagraph": "checklist determine age includes nn preprocedure n undertake age assessment relevant actor serious doubt stated age child ensure assessment initiated routine standard procedure procedure really necessary n plan physical examination measure last resort take place attempt eg gathering documentary evidence interviewing child etc failed establish age physical examination method assessing age n secure informed consent conduct age assessment child guardian extremely unlikely genuine informed consent forthcoming time crisis consent sought child time recover traumatic unsettling episode may take considerable time instance circumstance consent cannot used person person considered child child given informed consent physical examination nn procedure n conduct age assessment procedure using multidisciplinary approach draw range appropriately skilled professional solely physical examination range approach used age assessment n selecting professional conduct age assessment select without vested interest outcome independent agency actor would provide service support child would become responsible child assessed child professional engaged assessment independent n subject wish child support throughout process assessment including informing child language understands providing guardian legal representative accompany entire process child supported throughout process n develop conduct age assessment process culturally gender sensitive way using practitioner fully familiar child cultural ethnic background assessment sensitive cultural gender need n protect child bodily integrity dignity every stage process process free humiliation discrimination affront n conduct age assessment environment safe child support need child appropriate process consistent child safeguarding principle childfriendly nn post procedure n provide service support relevant outcome assessment without delay service support required address person identified need n doubt remains age child ensure applied advantage child doubt child age resolved favor child n promptly reasonably practical explain outcome consequence outcome child outcome consequence explained n inform child way challenge decision disagree child informed right challenge decision", "ProcessedSent": "checklist determine age includes nn preprocedure n undertake age assessment relevant actor serious doubt stated age child ensure assessment initiated routine standard procedure", "SentID": 8083 }, { "ParagraphID": 2387, - "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \\n\\n Pre-procedure: \\n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \\n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \\n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \\n\\n During the Procedure \\n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \\n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \\n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \\n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \\n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \\n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \\n\\n Post procedure \\n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \\n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \\n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \\n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", + "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \n\n Pre-procedure: \n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \n\n During the Procedure \n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \n\n Post procedure \n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145531,7 +145531,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2387, - "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \\n\\n Pre-procedure: \\n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \\n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \\n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \\n\\n During the Procedure \\n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \\n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \\n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \\n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \\n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \\n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \\n\\n Post procedure \\n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \\n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \\n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \\n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", + "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \n\n Pre-procedure: \n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \n\n During the Procedure \n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \n\n Post procedure \n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145542,14 +145542,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age.", + "Sentence": "\n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age.", "newParagraph": "checklist determine age includes nn preprocedure n undertake age assessment relevant actor serious doubt stated age child ensure assessment initiated routine standard procedure procedure really necessary n plan physical examination measure last resort take place attempt eg gathering documentary evidence interviewing child etc failed establish age physical examination method assessing age n secure informed consent conduct age assessment child guardian extremely unlikely genuine informed consent forthcoming time crisis consent sought child time recover traumatic unsettling episode may take considerable time instance circumstance consent cannot used person person considered child child given informed consent physical examination nn procedure n conduct age assessment procedure using multidisciplinary approach draw range appropriately skilled professional solely physical examination range approach used age assessment n selecting professional conduct age assessment select without vested interest outcome independent agency actor would provide service support child would become responsible child assessed child professional engaged assessment independent n subject wish child support throughout process assessment including informing child language understands providing guardian legal representative accompany entire process child supported throughout process n develop conduct age assessment process culturally gender sensitive way using practitioner fully familiar child cultural ethnic background assessment sensitive cultural gender need n protect child bodily integrity dignity every stage process process free humiliation discrimination affront n conduct age assessment environment safe child support need child appropriate process consistent child safeguarding principle childfriendly nn post procedure n provide service support relevant outcome assessment without delay service support required address person identified need n doubt remains age child ensure applied advantage child doubt child age resolved favor child n promptly reasonably practical explain outcome consequence outcome child outcome consequence explained n inform child way challenge decision disagree child informed right challenge decision", "ProcessedSent": "n plan physical examination measure last resort take place attempt eg gathering documentary evidence interviewing child etc failed establish age", "SentID": 8085 }, { "ParagraphID": 2387, - "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \\n\\n Pre-procedure: \\n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \\n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \\n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \\n\\n During the Procedure \\n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \\n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \\n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \\n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \\n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \\n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \\n\\n Post procedure \\n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \\n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \\n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \\n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", + "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \n\n Pre-procedure: \n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \n\n During the Procedure \n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \n\n Post procedure \n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145567,7 +145567,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2387, - "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \\n\\n Pre-procedure: \\n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \\n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \\n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \\n\\n During the Procedure \\n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \\n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \\n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \\n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \\n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \\n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \\n\\n Post procedure \\n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \\n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \\n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \\n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", + "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \n\n Pre-procedure: \n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \n\n During the Procedure \n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \n\n Post procedure \n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145578,14 +145578,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian.", + "Sentence": "\n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian.", "newParagraph": "checklist determine age includes nn preprocedure n undertake age assessment relevant actor serious doubt stated age child ensure assessment initiated routine standard procedure procedure really necessary n plan physical examination measure last resort take place attempt eg gathering documentary evidence interviewing child etc failed establish age physical examination method assessing age n secure informed consent conduct age assessment child guardian extremely unlikely genuine informed consent forthcoming time crisis consent sought child time recover traumatic unsettling episode may take considerable time instance circumstance consent cannot used person person considered child child given informed consent physical examination nn procedure n conduct age assessment procedure using multidisciplinary approach draw range appropriately skilled professional solely physical examination range approach used age assessment n selecting professional conduct age assessment select without vested interest outcome independent agency actor would provide service support child would become responsible child assessed child professional engaged assessment independent n subject wish child support throughout process assessment including informing child language understands providing guardian legal representative accompany entire process child supported throughout process n develop conduct age assessment process culturally gender sensitive way using practitioner fully familiar child cultural ethnic background assessment sensitive cultural gender need n protect child bodily integrity dignity every stage process process free humiliation discrimination affront n conduct age assessment environment safe child support need child appropriate process consistent child safeguarding principle childfriendly nn post procedure n provide service support relevant outcome assessment without delay service support required address person identified need n doubt remains age child ensure applied advantage child doubt child age resolved favor child n promptly reasonably practical explain outcome consequence outcome child outcome consequence explained n inform child way challenge decision disagree child informed right challenge decision", "ProcessedSent": "n secure informed consent conduct age assessment child guardian", "SentID": 8087 }, { "ParagraphID": 2387, - "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \\n\\n Pre-procedure: \\n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \\n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \\n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \\n\\n During the Procedure \\n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \\n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \\n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \\n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \\n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \\n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \\n\\n Post procedure \\n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \\n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \\n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \\n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", + "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \n\n Pre-procedure: \n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \n\n During the Procedure \n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \n\n Post procedure \n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145603,7 +145603,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2387, - "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \\n\\n Pre-procedure: \\n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \\n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \\n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \\n\\n During the Procedure \\n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \\n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \\n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \\n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \\n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \\n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \\n\\n Post procedure \\n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \\n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \\n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \\n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", + "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \n\n Pre-procedure: \n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \n\n During the Procedure \n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \n\n Post procedure \n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145621,7 +145621,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2387, - "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \\n\\n Pre-procedure: \\n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \\n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \\n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \\n\\n During the Procedure \\n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \\n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \\n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \\n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \\n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \\n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \\n\\n Post procedure \\n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \\n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \\n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \\n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", + "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \n\n Pre-procedure: \n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \n\n During the Procedure \n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \n\n Post procedure \n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145639,7 +145639,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2387, - "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \\n\\n Pre-procedure: \\n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \\n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \\n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \\n\\n During the Procedure \\n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \\n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \\n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \\n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \\n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \\n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \\n\\n Post procedure \\n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \\n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \\n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \\n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", + "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \n\n Pre-procedure: \n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \n\n During the Procedure \n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \n\n Post procedure \n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145650,14 +145650,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n During the Procedure \\n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination.", + "Sentence": "\n\n During the Procedure \n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination.", "newParagraph": "checklist determine age includes nn preprocedure n undertake age assessment relevant actor serious doubt stated age child ensure assessment initiated routine standard procedure procedure really necessary n plan physical examination measure last resort take place attempt eg gathering documentary evidence interviewing child etc failed establish age physical examination method assessing age n secure informed consent conduct age assessment child guardian extremely unlikely genuine informed consent forthcoming time crisis consent sought child time recover traumatic unsettling episode may take considerable time instance circumstance consent cannot used person person considered child child given informed consent physical examination nn procedure n conduct age assessment procedure using multidisciplinary approach draw range appropriately skilled professional solely physical examination range approach used age assessment n selecting professional conduct age assessment select without vested interest outcome independent agency actor would provide service support child would become responsible child assessed child professional engaged assessment independent n subject wish child support throughout process assessment including informing child language understands providing guardian legal representative accompany entire process child supported throughout process n develop conduct age assessment process culturally gender sensitive way using practitioner fully familiar child cultural ethnic background assessment sensitive cultural gender need n protect child bodily integrity dignity every stage process process free humiliation discrimination affront n conduct age assessment environment safe child support need child appropriate process consistent child safeguarding principle childfriendly nn post procedure n provide service support relevant outcome assessment without delay service support required address person identified need n doubt remains age child ensure applied advantage child doubt child age resolved favor child n promptly reasonably practical explain outcome consequence outcome child outcome consequence explained n inform child way challenge decision disagree child informed right challenge decision", "ProcessedSent": "nn procedure n conduct age assessment procedure using multidisciplinary approach draw range appropriately skilled professional solely physical examination", "SentID": 8091 }, { "ParagraphID": 2387, - "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \\n\\n Pre-procedure: \\n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \\n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \\n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \\n\\n During the Procedure \\n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \\n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \\n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \\n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \\n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \\n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \\n\\n Post procedure \\n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \\n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \\n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \\n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", + "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \n\n Pre-procedure: \n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \n\n During the Procedure \n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \n\n Post procedure \n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145675,7 +145675,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2387, - "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \\n\\n Pre-procedure: \\n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \\n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \\n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \\n\\n During the Procedure \\n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \\n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \\n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \\n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \\n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \\n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \\n\\n Post procedure \\n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \\n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \\n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \\n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", + "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \n\n Pre-procedure: \n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \n\n During the Procedure \n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \n\n Post procedure \n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145686,14 +145686,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child.", + "Sentence": "\n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child.", "newParagraph": "checklist determine age includes nn preprocedure n undertake age assessment relevant actor serious doubt stated age child ensure assessment initiated routine standard procedure procedure really necessary n plan physical examination measure last resort take place attempt eg gathering documentary evidence interviewing child etc failed establish age physical examination method assessing age n secure informed consent conduct age assessment child guardian extremely unlikely genuine informed consent forthcoming time crisis consent sought child time recover traumatic unsettling episode may take considerable time instance circumstance consent cannot used person person considered child child given informed consent physical examination nn procedure n conduct age assessment procedure using multidisciplinary approach draw range appropriately skilled professional solely physical examination range approach used age assessment n selecting professional conduct age assessment select without vested interest outcome independent agency actor would provide service support child would become responsible child assessed child professional engaged assessment independent n subject wish child support throughout process assessment including informing child language understands providing guardian legal representative accompany entire process child supported throughout process n develop conduct age assessment process culturally gender sensitive way using practitioner fully familiar child cultural ethnic background assessment sensitive cultural gender need n protect child bodily integrity dignity every stage process process free humiliation discrimination affront n conduct age assessment environment safe child support need child appropriate process consistent child safeguarding principle childfriendly nn post procedure n provide service support relevant outcome assessment without delay service support required address person identified need n doubt remains age child ensure applied advantage child doubt child age resolved favor child n promptly reasonably practical explain outcome consequence outcome child outcome consequence explained n inform child way challenge decision disagree child informed right challenge decision", "ProcessedSent": "n selecting professional conduct age assessment select without vested interest outcome independent agency actor would provide service support child would become responsible child assessed child", "SentID": 8093 }, { "ParagraphID": 2387, - "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \\n\\n Pre-procedure: \\n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \\n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \\n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \\n\\n During the Procedure \\n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \\n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \\n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \\n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \\n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \\n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \\n\\n Post procedure \\n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \\n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \\n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \\n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", + "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \n\n Pre-procedure: \n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \n\n During the Procedure \n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \n\n Post procedure \n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145711,7 +145711,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2387, - "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \\n\\n Pre-procedure: \\n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \\n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \\n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \\n\\n During the Procedure \\n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \\n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \\n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \\n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \\n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \\n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \\n\\n Post procedure \\n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \\n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \\n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \\n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", + "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \n\n Pre-procedure: \n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \n\n During the Procedure \n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \n\n Post procedure \n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145722,14 +145722,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process.", + "Sentence": "\n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process.", "newParagraph": "checklist determine age includes nn preprocedure n undertake age assessment relevant actor serious doubt stated age child ensure assessment initiated routine standard procedure procedure really necessary n plan physical examination measure last resort take place attempt eg gathering documentary evidence interviewing child etc failed establish age physical examination method assessing age n secure informed consent conduct age assessment child guardian extremely unlikely genuine informed consent forthcoming time crisis consent sought child time recover traumatic unsettling episode may take considerable time instance circumstance consent cannot used person person considered child child given informed consent physical examination nn procedure n conduct age assessment procedure using multidisciplinary approach draw range appropriately skilled professional solely physical examination range approach used age assessment n selecting professional conduct age assessment select without vested interest outcome independent agency actor would provide service support child would become responsible child assessed child professional engaged assessment independent n subject wish child support throughout process assessment including informing child language understands providing guardian legal representative accompany entire process child supported throughout process n develop conduct age assessment process culturally gender sensitive way using practitioner fully familiar child cultural ethnic background assessment sensitive cultural gender need n protect child bodily integrity dignity every stage process process free humiliation discrimination affront n conduct age assessment environment safe child support need child appropriate process consistent child safeguarding principle childfriendly nn post procedure n provide service support relevant outcome assessment without delay service support required address person identified need n doubt remains age child ensure applied advantage child doubt child age resolved favor child n promptly reasonably practical explain outcome consequence outcome child outcome consequence explained n inform child way challenge decision disagree child informed right challenge decision", "ProcessedSent": "n subject wish child support throughout process assessment including informing child language understands providing guardian legal representative accompany entire process", "SentID": 8095 }, { "ParagraphID": 2387, - "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \\n\\n Pre-procedure: \\n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \\n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \\n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \\n\\n During the Procedure \\n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \\n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \\n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \\n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \\n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \\n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \\n\\n Post procedure \\n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \\n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \\n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \\n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", + "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \n\n Pre-procedure: \n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \n\n During the Procedure \n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \n\n Post procedure \n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145747,7 +145747,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2387, - "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \\n\\n Pre-procedure: \\n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \\n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \\n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \\n\\n During the Procedure \\n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \\n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \\n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \\n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \\n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \\n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \\n\\n Post procedure \\n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \\n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \\n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \\n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", + "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \n\n Pre-procedure: \n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \n\n During the Procedure \n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \n\n Post procedure \n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145758,14 +145758,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background.", + "Sentence": "\n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background.", "newParagraph": "checklist determine age includes nn preprocedure n undertake age assessment relevant actor serious doubt stated age child ensure assessment initiated routine standard procedure procedure really necessary n plan physical examination measure last resort take place attempt eg gathering documentary evidence interviewing child etc failed establish age physical examination method assessing age n secure informed consent conduct age assessment child guardian extremely unlikely genuine informed consent forthcoming time crisis consent sought child time recover traumatic unsettling episode may take considerable time instance circumstance consent cannot used person person considered child child given informed consent physical examination nn procedure n conduct age assessment procedure using multidisciplinary approach draw range appropriately skilled professional solely physical examination range approach used age assessment n selecting professional conduct age assessment select without vested interest outcome independent agency actor would provide service support child would become responsible child assessed child professional engaged assessment independent n subject wish child support throughout process assessment including informing child language understands providing guardian legal representative accompany entire process child supported throughout process n develop conduct age assessment process culturally gender sensitive way using practitioner fully familiar child cultural ethnic background assessment sensitive cultural gender need n protect child bodily integrity dignity every stage process process free humiliation discrimination affront n conduct age assessment environment safe child support need child appropriate process consistent child safeguarding principle childfriendly nn post procedure n provide service support relevant outcome assessment without delay service support required address person identified need n doubt remains age child ensure applied advantage child doubt child age resolved favor child n promptly reasonably practical explain outcome consequence outcome child outcome consequence explained n inform child way challenge decision disagree child informed right challenge decision", "ProcessedSent": "n develop conduct age assessment process culturally gender sensitive way using practitioner fully familiar child cultural ethnic background", "SentID": 8097 }, { "ParagraphID": 2387, - "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \\n\\n Pre-procedure: \\n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \\n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \\n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \\n\\n During the Procedure \\n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \\n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \\n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \\n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \\n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \\n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \\n\\n Post procedure \\n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \\n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \\n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \\n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", + "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \n\n Pre-procedure: \n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \n\n During the Procedure \n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \n\n Post procedure \n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145783,7 +145783,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2387, - "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \\n\\n Pre-procedure: \\n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \\n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \\n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \\n\\n During the Procedure \\n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \\n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \\n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \\n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \\n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \\n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \\n\\n Post procedure \\n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \\n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \\n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \\n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", + "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \n\n Pre-procedure: \n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \n\n During the Procedure \n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \n\n Post procedure \n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145794,14 +145794,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process.", + "Sentence": "\n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process.", "newParagraph": "checklist determine age includes nn preprocedure n undertake age assessment relevant actor serious doubt stated age child ensure assessment initiated routine standard procedure procedure really necessary n plan physical examination measure last resort take place attempt eg gathering documentary evidence interviewing child etc failed establish age physical examination method assessing age n secure informed consent conduct age assessment child guardian extremely unlikely genuine informed consent forthcoming time crisis consent sought child time recover traumatic unsettling episode may take considerable time instance circumstance consent cannot used person person considered child child given informed consent physical examination nn procedure n conduct age assessment procedure using multidisciplinary approach draw range appropriately skilled professional solely physical examination range approach used age assessment n selecting professional conduct age assessment select without vested interest outcome independent agency actor would provide service support child would become responsible child assessed child professional engaged assessment independent n subject wish child support throughout process assessment including informing child language understands providing guardian legal representative accompany entire process child supported throughout process n develop conduct age assessment process culturally gender sensitive way using practitioner fully familiar child cultural ethnic background assessment sensitive cultural gender need n protect child bodily integrity dignity every stage process process free humiliation discrimination affront n conduct age assessment environment safe child support need child appropriate process consistent child safeguarding principle childfriendly nn post procedure n provide service support relevant outcome assessment without delay service support required address person identified need n doubt remains age child ensure applied advantage child doubt child age resolved favor child n promptly reasonably practical explain outcome consequence outcome child outcome consequence explained n inform child way challenge decision disagree child informed right challenge decision", "ProcessedSent": "n protect child bodily integrity dignity every stage process", "SentID": 8099 }, { "ParagraphID": 2387, - "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \\n\\n Pre-procedure: \\n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \\n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \\n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \\n\\n During the Procedure \\n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \\n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \\n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \\n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \\n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \\n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \\n\\n Post procedure \\n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \\n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \\n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \\n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", + "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \n\n Pre-procedure: \n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \n\n During the Procedure \n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \n\n Post procedure \n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145819,7 +145819,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2387, - "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \\n\\n Pre-procedure: \\n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \\n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \\n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \\n\\n During the Procedure \\n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \\n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \\n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \\n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \\n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \\n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \\n\\n Post procedure \\n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \\n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \\n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \\n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", + "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \n\n Pre-procedure: \n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \n\n During the Procedure \n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \n\n Post procedure \n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145830,14 +145830,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate.", + "Sentence": "\n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate.", "newParagraph": "checklist determine age includes nn preprocedure n undertake age assessment relevant actor serious doubt stated age child ensure assessment initiated routine standard procedure procedure really necessary n plan physical examination measure last resort take place attempt eg gathering documentary evidence interviewing child etc failed establish age physical examination method assessing age n secure informed consent conduct age assessment child guardian extremely unlikely genuine informed consent forthcoming time crisis consent sought child time recover traumatic unsettling episode may take considerable time instance circumstance consent cannot used person person considered child child given informed consent physical examination nn procedure n conduct age assessment procedure using multidisciplinary approach draw range appropriately skilled professional solely physical examination range approach used age assessment n selecting professional conduct age assessment select without vested interest outcome independent agency actor would provide service support child would become responsible child assessed child professional engaged assessment independent n subject wish child support throughout process assessment including informing child language understands providing guardian legal representative accompany entire process child supported throughout process n develop conduct age assessment process culturally gender sensitive way using practitioner fully familiar child cultural ethnic background assessment sensitive cultural gender need n protect child bodily integrity dignity every stage process process free humiliation discrimination affront n conduct age assessment environment safe child support need child appropriate process consistent child safeguarding principle childfriendly nn post procedure n provide service support relevant outcome assessment without delay service support required address person identified need n doubt remains age child ensure applied advantage child doubt child age resolved favor child n promptly reasonably practical explain outcome consequence outcome child outcome consequence explained n inform child way challenge decision disagree child informed right challenge decision", "ProcessedSent": "n conduct age assessment environment safe child support need child appropriate", "SentID": 8101 }, { "ParagraphID": 2387, - "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \\n\\n Pre-procedure: \\n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \\n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \\n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \\n\\n During the Procedure \\n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \\n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \\n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \\n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \\n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \\n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \\n\\n Post procedure \\n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \\n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \\n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \\n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", + "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \n\n Pre-procedure: \n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \n\n During the Procedure \n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \n\n Post procedure \n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145855,7 +145855,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2387, - "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \\n\\n Pre-procedure: \\n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \\n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \\n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \\n\\n During the Procedure \\n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \\n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \\n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \\n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \\n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \\n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \\n\\n Post procedure \\n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \\n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \\n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \\n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", + "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \n\n Pre-procedure: \n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \n\n During the Procedure \n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \n\n Post procedure \n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145866,14 +145866,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Post procedure \\n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Post procedure \n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay.", "newParagraph": "checklist determine age includes nn preprocedure n undertake age assessment relevant actor serious doubt stated age child ensure assessment initiated routine standard procedure procedure really necessary n plan physical examination measure last resort take place attempt eg gathering documentary evidence interviewing child etc failed establish age physical examination method assessing age n secure informed consent conduct age assessment child guardian extremely unlikely genuine informed consent forthcoming time crisis consent sought child time recover traumatic unsettling episode may take considerable time instance circumstance consent cannot used person person considered child child given informed consent physical examination nn procedure n conduct age assessment procedure using multidisciplinary approach draw range appropriately skilled professional solely physical examination range approach used age assessment n selecting professional conduct age assessment select without vested interest outcome independent agency actor would provide service support child would become responsible child assessed child professional engaged assessment independent n subject wish child support throughout process assessment including informing child language understands providing guardian legal representative accompany entire process child supported throughout process n develop conduct age assessment process culturally gender sensitive way using practitioner fully familiar child cultural ethnic background assessment sensitive cultural gender need n protect child bodily integrity dignity every stage process process free humiliation discrimination affront n conduct age assessment environment safe child support need child appropriate process consistent child safeguarding principle childfriendly nn post procedure n provide service support relevant outcome assessment without delay service support required address person identified need n doubt remains age child ensure applied advantage child doubt child age resolved favor child n promptly reasonably practical explain outcome consequence outcome child outcome consequence explained n inform child way challenge decision disagree child informed right challenge decision", "ProcessedSent": "nn post procedure n provide service support relevant outcome assessment without delay", "SentID": 8103 }, { "ParagraphID": 2387, - "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \\n\\n Pre-procedure: \\n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \\n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \\n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \\n\\n During the Procedure \\n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \\n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \\n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \\n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \\n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \\n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \\n\\n Post procedure \\n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \\n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \\n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \\n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", + "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \n\n Pre-procedure: \n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \n\n During the Procedure \n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \n\n Post procedure \n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145891,7 +145891,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2387, - "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \\n\\n Pre-procedure: \\n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \\n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \\n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \\n\\n During the Procedure \\n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \\n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \\n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \\n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \\n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \\n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \\n\\n Post procedure \\n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \\n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \\n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \\n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", + "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \n\n Pre-procedure: \n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \n\n During the Procedure \n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \n\n Post procedure \n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145902,14 +145902,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child.", + "Sentence": "\n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child.", "newParagraph": "checklist determine age includes nn preprocedure n undertake age assessment relevant actor serious doubt stated age child ensure assessment initiated routine standard procedure procedure really necessary n plan physical examination measure last resort take place attempt eg gathering documentary evidence interviewing child etc failed establish age physical examination method assessing age n secure informed consent conduct age assessment child guardian extremely unlikely genuine informed consent forthcoming time crisis consent sought child time recover traumatic unsettling episode may take considerable time instance circumstance consent cannot used person person considered child child given informed consent physical examination nn procedure n conduct age assessment procedure using multidisciplinary approach draw range appropriately skilled professional solely physical examination range approach used age assessment n selecting professional conduct age assessment select without vested interest outcome independent agency actor would provide service support child would become responsible child assessed child professional engaged assessment independent n subject wish child support throughout process assessment including informing child language understands providing guardian legal representative accompany entire process child supported throughout process n develop conduct age assessment process culturally gender sensitive way using practitioner fully familiar child cultural ethnic background assessment sensitive cultural gender need n protect child bodily integrity dignity every stage process process free humiliation discrimination affront n conduct age assessment environment safe child support need child appropriate process consistent child safeguarding principle childfriendly nn post procedure n provide service support relevant outcome assessment without delay service support required address person identified need n doubt remains age child ensure applied advantage child doubt child age resolved favor child n promptly reasonably practical explain outcome consequence outcome child outcome consequence explained n inform child way challenge decision disagree child informed right challenge decision", "ProcessedSent": "n doubt remains age child ensure applied advantage child", "SentID": 8105 }, { "ParagraphID": 2387, - "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \\n\\n Pre-procedure: \\n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \\n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \\n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \\n\\n During the Procedure \\n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \\n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \\n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \\n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \\n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \\n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \\n\\n Post procedure \\n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \\n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \\n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \\n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", + "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \n\n Pre-procedure: \n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \n\n During the Procedure \n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \n\n Post procedure \n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145927,7 +145927,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2387, - "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \\n\\n Pre-procedure: \\n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \\n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \\n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \\n\\n During the Procedure \\n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \\n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \\n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \\n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \\n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \\n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \\n\\n Post procedure \\n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \\n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \\n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \\n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", + "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \n\n Pre-procedure: \n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \n\n During the Procedure \n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \n\n Post procedure \n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145938,14 +145938,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child.", + "Sentence": "\n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child.", "newParagraph": "checklist determine age includes nn preprocedure n undertake age assessment relevant actor serious doubt stated age child ensure assessment initiated routine standard procedure procedure really necessary n plan physical examination measure last resort take place attempt eg gathering documentary evidence interviewing child etc failed establish age physical examination method assessing age n secure informed consent conduct age assessment child guardian extremely unlikely genuine informed consent forthcoming time crisis consent sought child time recover traumatic unsettling episode may take considerable time instance circumstance consent cannot used person person considered child child given informed consent physical examination nn procedure n conduct age assessment procedure using multidisciplinary approach draw range appropriately skilled professional solely physical examination range approach used age assessment n selecting professional conduct age assessment select without vested interest outcome independent agency actor would provide service support child would become responsible child assessed child professional engaged assessment independent n subject wish child support throughout process assessment including informing child language understands providing guardian legal representative accompany entire process child supported throughout process n develop conduct age assessment process culturally gender sensitive way using practitioner fully familiar child cultural ethnic background assessment sensitive cultural gender need n protect child bodily integrity dignity every stage process process free humiliation discrimination affront n conduct age assessment environment safe child support need child appropriate process consistent child safeguarding principle childfriendly nn post procedure n provide service support relevant outcome assessment without delay service support required address person identified need n doubt remains age child ensure applied advantage child doubt child age resolved favor child n promptly reasonably practical explain outcome consequence outcome child outcome consequence explained n inform child way challenge decision disagree child informed right challenge decision", "ProcessedSent": "n promptly reasonably practical explain outcome consequence outcome child", "SentID": 8107 }, { "ParagraphID": 2387, - "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \\n\\n Pre-procedure: \\n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \\n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \\n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \\n\\n During the Procedure \\n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \\n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \\n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \\n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \\n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \\n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \\n\\n Post procedure \\n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \\n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \\n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \\n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", + "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \n\n Pre-procedure: \n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \n\n During the Procedure \n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \n\n Post procedure \n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145963,7 +145963,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2387, - "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \\n\\n Pre-procedure: \\n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \\n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \\n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \\n\\n During the Procedure \\n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \\n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \\n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \\n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \\n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \\n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \\n\\n Post procedure \\n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \\n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \\n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \\n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", + "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \n\n Pre-procedure: \n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \n\n During the Procedure \n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \n\n Post procedure \n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -145974,14 +145974,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with.", + "Sentence": "\n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with.", "newParagraph": "checklist determine age includes nn preprocedure n undertake age assessment relevant actor serious doubt stated age child ensure assessment initiated routine standard procedure procedure really necessary n plan physical examination measure last resort take place attempt eg gathering documentary evidence interviewing child etc failed establish age physical examination method assessing age n secure informed consent conduct age assessment child guardian extremely unlikely genuine informed consent forthcoming time crisis consent sought child time recover traumatic unsettling episode may take considerable time instance circumstance consent cannot used person person considered child child given informed consent physical examination nn procedure n conduct age assessment procedure using multidisciplinary approach draw range appropriately skilled professional solely physical examination range approach used age assessment n selecting professional conduct age assessment select without vested interest outcome independent agency actor would provide service support child would become responsible child assessed child professional engaged assessment independent n subject wish child support throughout process assessment including informing child language understands providing guardian legal representative accompany entire process child supported throughout process n develop conduct age assessment process culturally gender sensitive way using practitioner fully familiar child cultural ethnic background assessment sensitive cultural gender need n protect child bodily integrity dignity every stage process process free humiliation discrimination affront n conduct age assessment environment safe child support need child appropriate process consistent child safeguarding principle childfriendly nn post procedure n provide service support relevant outcome assessment without delay service support required address person identified need n doubt remains age child ensure applied advantage child doubt child age resolved favor child n promptly reasonably practical explain outcome consequence outcome child outcome consequence explained n inform child way challenge decision disagree child informed right challenge decision", "ProcessedSent": "n inform child way challenge decision disagree", "SentID": 8109 }, { "ParagraphID": 2387, - "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \\n\\n Pre-procedure: \\n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \\n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \\n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \\n\\n During the Procedure \\n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \\n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \\n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \\n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \\n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \\n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \\n\\n Post procedure \\n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \\n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \\n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \\n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", + "Paragraph": "The checklist to determine the age includes: \n\n Pre-procedure: \n Undertake an age assessment only when relevant actors have serious doubts about the stated age of the child; ensure that the assessment is not being initiated as a routine or standard procedure. Is the procedure really necessary? \n Plan any physical examination only as a measure of last resort to take place only when all other attempts e.g., the gathering of documentary evidence, interviewing the child, etc., have failed to establish age. Is a physical examination the only method of assessing age? \n Secure informed consent to conduct the age assessment from the child or the guardian. It is extremely unlikely that genuine informed consent can be forthcoming at a time of \u2018crisis\u2019 and consent should only be sought when a child has had time to recover from traumatic or unsettling episodes \u2013 this may take considerable time in some instances. In circumstances where there is no consent, it cannot be used against the person and the person should be considered a child. Has the child given informed consent to a physical examination? \n\n During the Procedure \n Conduct any age assessment procedure using a multi-disciplinary approach that draws on a range of appropriately skilled professionals and not solely on a physical examination. Is a range of approaches being used in the age assessment? \n When selecting professionals to conduct an age assessment, select only those without a vested interest in the outcome, and who are independent from any agencies and actors that would provide services or support to the child or who would become responsible for the child if they are assessed as being a child. Are the professionals engaged in the assessment independent? \n Subject to the wishes of the child, support him or her throughout the process of assessment, including by informing the child in a language he or she understands, and providing a guardian, legal or other representative to accompany them during the entire process. Is the child supported throughout the process? \n Develop and conduct the age assessment process in a culturally and gender sensitive way using practitioners who are fully familiar with the child\u2019s cultural and ethnic background. Is the assessment sensitive to cultural and gender needs? \n Protect the child\u2019s bodily integrity and dignity at every stage of the process. Is the process free from humiliation, discrimination, or other affront? \n Conduct the age assessment in an environment that is safe for children, which supports their needs and is child appropriate. Is the process consistent with child safeguarding principles and child-friendly? \n\n Post procedure \n Provide any services and support relevant to the outcome of the assessment without delay. What services and support are required to address the person\u2019s identified needs? \n If any doubt remains about the age of the child, ensure that this is applied to the advantage of the child. Has any doubt about the child\u2019s age been resolved in favor of the child? \n As promptly as is reasonably practical, explain the outcome and the consequences of the outcome to the child. Have the outcome and its consequences been explained? \n Inform the child of the ways that he or she can challenge a decision which they disagree with. Has the child been informed of his or her rights to challenge the decision?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -146071,7 +146071,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2390, - "Paragraph": "Guiding principles and implementation strategies \\n The decision to open a centre should be based on the following conditions: The level of insecurity in community of origin; \\n The level of success in tracing the child\u2019s family or primary caregiver; \\n The level of medical assistance and follow-up required before integration; and \\n The level of immediate psychosocial support required before reintegration.", + "Paragraph": "Guiding principles and implementation strategies \n The decision to open a centre should be based on the following conditions: The level of insecurity in community of origin; \n The level of success in tracing the child\u2019s family or primary caregiver; \n The level of medical assistance and follow-up required before integration; and \n The level of immediate psychosocial support required before reintegration.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -146082,14 +146082,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Guiding principles and implementation strategies \\n The decision to open a centre should be based on the following conditions: The level of insecurity in community of origin; \\n The level of success in tracing the child\u2019s family or primary caregiver; \\n The level of medical assistance and follow-up required before integration; and \\n The level of immediate psychosocial support required before reintegration.", + "Sentence": "Guiding principles and implementation strategies \n The decision to open a centre should be based on the following conditions: The level of insecurity in community of origin; \n The level of success in tracing the child\u2019s family or primary caregiver; \n The level of medical assistance and follow-up required before integration; and \n The level of immediate psychosocial support required before reintegration.", "newParagraph": "guiding principle implementation strategy n decision open centre based following condition level insecurity community origin n level success tracing child family primary caregiver n level medical assistance followup required integration n level immediate psychosocial support required reintegration", "ProcessedSent": "guiding principle implementation strategy n decision open centre based following condition level insecurity community origin n level success tracing child family primary caregiver n level medical assistance followup required integration n level immediate psychosocial support required reintegration", "SentID": 8115 }, { "ParagraphID": 2391, - "Paragraph": "Management guidelines for Interim Care Centres \\n\\n The following management guidelines apply: \\n Child protection specialists, not military or other actors should manage the centres. \\n Children should only stay a limited amount of time in ICCs, and documentation and monitoring systems should be established to ensure that the length of stay is brief (weeks not months). \\n At the end of their stay, if family reunification is not feasible, provision should be made for children to be cared for in other ways (in foster families, extended family networks, etc.). Systems should be established to protect children from abuse, and a code of conduct should be drawn up and applied. An adequate number of male and female staff should be available to deal with the differing needs of boys and girls. \\n Staff should be trained in prevention of and response to gender-based violence and exploitation involving children, norms of confidentiality, child psychosocial development, tracing and reunification. \\n ICCs should only accommodate children under 18. Some flexibility can be considered, based on the best interests of the child, e.g., in relation to girl mothers with infants and children or on medical grounds, on a case-by-case basis. In addition, young children (under 14) should be separated from adolescents in order to avoid any risk of older children abusing younger ones. \\n Sanitation and accommodation facilities should separate girls from boys and be sensitive to the needs of infants and girl mothers. \\n ICCs should be located at a safe distance from conflict and recruitment areas; external access to the centre should be controlled. (For example, entry of adult combatants and fighters and the media can be disruptive, and can expose children to additional risks.) Security should be provided by peacekeepers or neutral forces.", + "Paragraph": "Management guidelines for Interim Care Centres \n\n The following management guidelines apply: \n Child protection specialists, not military or other actors should manage the centres. \n Children should only stay a limited amount of time in ICCs, and documentation and monitoring systems should be established to ensure that the length of stay is brief (weeks not months). \n At the end of their stay, if family reunification is not feasible, provision should be made for children to be cared for in other ways (in foster families, extended family networks, etc.). Systems should be established to protect children from abuse, and a code of conduct should be drawn up and applied. An adequate number of male and female staff should be available to deal with the differing needs of boys and girls. \n Staff should be trained in prevention of and response to gender-based violence and exploitation involving children, norms of confidentiality, child psychosocial development, tracing and reunification. \n ICCs should only accommodate children under 18. Some flexibility can be considered, based on the best interests of the child, e.g., in relation to girl mothers with infants and children or on medical grounds, on a case-by-case basis. In addition, young children (under 14) should be separated from adolescents in order to avoid any risk of older children abusing younger ones. \n Sanitation and accommodation facilities should separate girls from boys and be sensitive to the needs of infants and girl mothers. \n ICCs should be located at a safe distance from conflict and recruitment areas; external access to the centre should be controlled. (For example, entry of adult combatants and fighters and the media can be disruptive, and can expose children to additional risks.) Security should be provided by peacekeepers or neutral forces.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -146100,14 +146100,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Management guidelines for Interim Care Centres \\n\\n The following management guidelines apply: \\n Child protection specialists, not military or other actors should manage the centres.", + "Sentence": "Management guidelines for Interim Care Centres \n\n The following management guidelines apply: \n Child protection specialists, not military or other actors should manage the centres.", "newParagraph": "management guideline interim care centre nn following management guideline apply n child protection specialist military actor manage centre n child stay limited amount time icc documentation monitoring system established ensure length stay brief week month n end stay family reunification feasible provision made child cared way foster family extended family network etc system established protect child abuse code conduct drawn applied adequate number male female staff available deal differing need boy girl n staff trained prevention response genderbased violence exploitation involving child norm confidentiality child psychosocial development tracing reunification n icc accommodate child 18 flexibility considered based best interest child eg relation girl mother infant child medical ground casebycase basis addition young child 14 separated adolescent order avoid risk older child abusing younger one n sanitation accommodation facility separate girl boy sensitive need infant girl mother n icc located safe distance conflict recruitment area external access centre controlled example entry adult combatant fighter medium disruptive expose child additional risk security provided peacekeeper neutral force", "ProcessedSent": "management guideline interim care centre nn following management guideline apply n child protection specialist military actor manage centre", "SentID": 8116 }, { "ParagraphID": 2391, - "Paragraph": "Management guidelines for Interim Care Centres \\n\\n The following management guidelines apply: \\n Child protection specialists, not military or other actors should manage the centres. \\n Children should only stay a limited amount of time in ICCs, and documentation and monitoring systems should be established to ensure that the length of stay is brief (weeks not months). \\n At the end of their stay, if family reunification is not feasible, provision should be made for children to be cared for in other ways (in foster families, extended family networks, etc.). Systems should be established to protect children from abuse, and a code of conduct should be drawn up and applied. An adequate number of male and female staff should be available to deal with the differing needs of boys and girls. \\n Staff should be trained in prevention of and response to gender-based violence and exploitation involving children, norms of confidentiality, child psychosocial development, tracing and reunification. \\n ICCs should only accommodate children under 18. Some flexibility can be considered, based on the best interests of the child, e.g., in relation to girl mothers with infants and children or on medical grounds, on a case-by-case basis. In addition, young children (under 14) should be separated from adolescents in order to avoid any risk of older children abusing younger ones. \\n Sanitation and accommodation facilities should separate girls from boys and be sensitive to the needs of infants and girl mothers. \\n ICCs should be located at a safe distance from conflict and recruitment areas; external access to the centre should be controlled. (For example, entry of adult combatants and fighters and the media can be disruptive, and can expose children to additional risks.) Security should be provided by peacekeepers or neutral forces.", + "Paragraph": "Management guidelines for Interim Care Centres \n\n The following management guidelines apply: \n Child protection specialists, not military or other actors should manage the centres. \n Children should only stay a limited amount of time in ICCs, and documentation and monitoring systems should be established to ensure that the length of stay is brief (weeks not months). \n At the end of their stay, if family reunification is not feasible, provision should be made for children to be cared for in other ways (in foster families, extended family networks, etc.). Systems should be established to protect children from abuse, and a code of conduct should be drawn up and applied. An adequate number of male and female staff should be available to deal with the differing needs of boys and girls. \n Staff should be trained in prevention of and response to gender-based violence and exploitation involving children, norms of confidentiality, child psychosocial development, tracing and reunification. \n ICCs should only accommodate children under 18. Some flexibility can be considered, based on the best interests of the child, e.g., in relation to girl mothers with infants and children or on medical grounds, on a case-by-case basis. In addition, young children (under 14) should be separated from adolescents in order to avoid any risk of older children abusing younger ones. \n Sanitation and accommodation facilities should separate girls from boys and be sensitive to the needs of infants and girl mothers. \n ICCs should be located at a safe distance from conflict and recruitment areas; external access to the centre should be controlled. (For example, entry of adult combatants and fighters and the media can be disruptive, and can expose children to additional risks.) Security should be provided by peacekeepers or neutral forces.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -146118,14 +146118,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Children should only stay a limited amount of time in ICCs, and documentation and monitoring systems should be established to ensure that the length of stay is brief (weeks not months).", + "Sentence": "\n Children should only stay a limited amount of time in ICCs, and documentation and monitoring systems should be established to ensure that the length of stay is brief (weeks not months).", "newParagraph": "management guideline interim care centre nn following management guideline apply n child protection specialist military actor manage centre n child stay limited amount time icc documentation monitoring system established ensure length stay brief week month n end stay family reunification feasible provision made child cared way foster family extended family network etc system established protect child abuse code conduct drawn applied adequate number male female staff available deal differing need boy girl n staff trained prevention response genderbased violence exploitation involving child norm confidentiality child psychosocial development tracing reunification n icc accommodate child 18 flexibility considered based best interest child eg relation girl mother infant child medical ground casebycase basis addition young child 14 separated adolescent order avoid risk older child abusing younger one n sanitation accommodation facility separate girl boy sensitive need infant girl mother n icc located safe distance conflict recruitment area external access centre controlled example entry adult combatant fighter medium disruptive expose child additional risk security provided peacekeeper neutral force", "ProcessedSent": "n child stay limited amount time icc documentation monitoring system established ensure length stay brief week month", "SentID": 8117 }, { "ParagraphID": 2391, - "Paragraph": "Management guidelines for Interim Care Centres \\n\\n The following management guidelines apply: \\n Child protection specialists, not military or other actors should manage the centres. \\n Children should only stay a limited amount of time in ICCs, and documentation and monitoring systems should be established to ensure that the length of stay is brief (weeks not months). \\n At the end of their stay, if family reunification is not feasible, provision should be made for children to be cared for in other ways (in foster families, extended family networks, etc.). Systems should be established to protect children from abuse, and a code of conduct should be drawn up and applied. An adequate number of male and female staff should be available to deal with the differing needs of boys and girls. \\n Staff should be trained in prevention of and response to gender-based violence and exploitation involving children, norms of confidentiality, child psychosocial development, tracing and reunification. \\n ICCs should only accommodate children under 18. Some flexibility can be considered, based on the best interests of the child, e.g., in relation to girl mothers with infants and children or on medical grounds, on a case-by-case basis. In addition, young children (under 14) should be separated from adolescents in order to avoid any risk of older children abusing younger ones. \\n Sanitation and accommodation facilities should separate girls from boys and be sensitive to the needs of infants and girl mothers. \\n ICCs should be located at a safe distance from conflict and recruitment areas; external access to the centre should be controlled. (For example, entry of adult combatants and fighters and the media can be disruptive, and can expose children to additional risks.) Security should be provided by peacekeepers or neutral forces.", + "Paragraph": "Management guidelines for Interim Care Centres \n\n The following management guidelines apply: \n Child protection specialists, not military or other actors should manage the centres. \n Children should only stay a limited amount of time in ICCs, and documentation and monitoring systems should be established to ensure that the length of stay is brief (weeks not months). \n At the end of their stay, if family reunification is not feasible, provision should be made for children to be cared for in other ways (in foster families, extended family networks, etc.). Systems should be established to protect children from abuse, and a code of conduct should be drawn up and applied. An adequate number of male and female staff should be available to deal with the differing needs of boys and girls. \n Staff should be trained in prevention of and response to gender-based violence and exploitation involving children, norms of confidentiality, child psychosocial development, tracing and reunification. \n ICCs should only accommodate children under 18. Some flexibility can be considered, based on the best interests of the child, e.g., in relation to girl mothers with infants and children or on medical grounds, on a case-by-case basis. In addition, young children (under 14) should be separated from adolescents in order to avoid any risk of older children abusing younger ones. \n Sanitation and accommodation facilities should separate girls from boys and be sensitive to the needs of infants and girl mothers. \n ICCs should be located at a safe distance from conflict and recruitment areas; external access to the centre should be controlled. (For example, entry of adult combatants and fighters and the media can be disruptive, and can expose children to additional risks.) Security should be provided by peacekeepers or neutral forces.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -146136,14 +146136,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n At the end of their stay, if family reunification is not feasible, provision should be made for children to be cared for in other ways (in foster families, extended family networks, etc.).", + "Sentence": "\n At the end of their stay, if family reunification is not feasible, provision should be made for children to be cared for in other ways (in foster families, extended family networks, etc.).", "newParagraph": "management guideline interim care centre nn following management guideline apply n child protection specialist military actor manage centre n child stay limited amount time icc documentation monitoring system established ensure length stay brief week month n end stay family reunification feasible provision made child cared way foster family extended family network etc system established protect child abuse code conduct drawn applied adequate number male female staff available deal differing need boy girl n staff trained prevention response genderbased violence exploitation involving child norm confidentiality child psychosocial development tracing reunification n icc accommodate child 18 flexibility considered based best interest child eg relation girl mother infant child medical ground casebycase basis addition young child 14 separated adolescent order avoid risk older child abusing younger one n sanitation accommodation facility separate girl boy sensitive need infant girl mother n icc located safe distance conflict recruitment area external access centre controlled example entry adult combatant fighter medium disruptive expose child additional risk security provided peacekeeper neutral force", "ProcessedSent": "n end stay family reunification feasible provision made child cared way foster family extended family network etc", "SentID": 8118 }, { "ParagraphID": 2391, - "Paragraph": "Management guidelines for Interim Care Centres \\n\\n The following management guidelines apply: \\n Child protection specialists, not military or other actors should manage the centres. \\n Children should only stay a limited amount of time in ICCs, and documentation and monitoring systems should be established to ensure that the length of stay is brief (weeks not months). \\n At the end of their stay, if family reunification is not feasible, provision should be made for children to be cared for in other ways (in foster families, extended family networks, etc.). Systems should be established to protect children from abuse, and a code of conduct should be drawn up and applied. An adequate number of male and female staff should be available to deal with the differing needs of boys and girls. \\n Staff should be trained in prevention of and response to gender-based violence and exploitation involving children, norms of confidentiality, child psychosocial development, tracing and reunification. \\n ICCs should only accommodate children under 18. Some flexibility can be considered, based on the best interests of the child, e.g., in relation to girl mothers with infants and children or on medical grounds, on a case-by-case basis. In addition, young children (under 14) should be separated from adolescents in order to avoid any risk of older children abusing younger ones. \\n Sanitation and accommodation facilities should separate girls from boys and be sensitive to the needs of infants and girl mothers. \\n ICCs should be located at a safe distance from conflict and recruitment areas; external access to the centre should be controlled. (For example, entry of adult combatants and fighters and the media can be disruptive, and can expose children to additional risks.) Security should be provided by peacekeepers or neutral forces.", + "Paragraph": "Management guidelines for Interim Care Centres \n\n The following management guidelines apply: \n Child protection specialists, not military or other actors should manage the centres. \n Children should only stay a limited amount of time in ICCs, and documentation and monitoring systems should be established to ensure that the length of stay is brief (weeks not months). \n At the end of their stay, if family reunification is not feasible, provision should be made for children to be cared for in other ways (in foster families, extended family networks, etc.). Systems should be established to protect children from abuse, and a code of conduct should be drawn up and applied. An adequate number of male and female staff should be available to deal with the differing needs of boys and girls. \n Staff should be trained in prevention of and response to gender-based violence and exploitation involving children, norms of confidentiality, child psychosocial development, tracing and reunification. \n ICCs should only accommodate children under 18. Some flexibility can be considered, based on the best interests of the child, e.g., in relation to girl mothers with infants and children or on medical grounds, on a case-by-case basis. In addition, young children (under 14) should be separated from adolescents in order to avoid any risk of older children abusing younger ones. \n Sanitation and accommodation facilities should separate girls from boys and be sensitive to the needs of infants and girl mothers. \n ICCs should be located at a safe distance from conflict and recruitment areas; external access to the centre should be controlled. (For example, entry of adult combatants and fighters and the media can be disruptive, and can expose children to additional risks.) Security should be provided by peacekeepers or neutral forces.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -146161,7 +146161,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2391, - "Paragraph": "Management guidelines for Interim Care Centres \\n\\n The following management guidelines apply: \\n Child protection specialists, not military or other actors should manage the centres. \\n Children should only stay a limited amount of time in ICCs, and documentation and monitoring systems should be established to ensure that the length of stay is brief (weeks not months). \\n At the end of their stay, if family reunification is not feasible, provision should be made for children to be cared for in other ways (in foster families, extended family networks, etc.). Systems should be established to protect children from abuse, and a code of conduct should be drawn up and applied. An adequate number of male and female staff should be available to deal with the differing needs of boys and girls. \\n Staff should be trained in prevention of and response to gender-based violence and exploitation involving children, norms of confidentiality, child psychosocial development, tracing and reunification. \\n ICCs should only accommodate children under 18. Some flexibility can be considered, based on the best interests of the child, e.g., in relation to girl mothers with infants and children or on medical grounds, on a case-by-case basis. In addition, young children (under 14) should be separated from adolescents in order to avoid any risk of older children abusing younger ones. \\n Sanitation and accommodation facilities should separate girls from boys and be sensitive to the needs of infants and girl mothers. \\n ICCs should be located at a safe distance from conflict and recruitment areas; external access to the centre should be controlled. (For example, entry of adult combatants and fighters and the media can be disruptive, and can expose children to additional risks.) Security should be provided by peacekeepers or neutral forces.", + "Paragraph": "Management guidelines for Interim Care Centres \n\n The following management guidelines apply: \n Child protection specialists, not military or other actors should manage the centres. \n Children should only stay a limited amount of time in ICCs, and documentation and monitoring systems should be established to ensure that the length of stay is brief (weeks not months). \n At the end of their stay, if family reunification is not feasible, provision should be made for children to be cared for in other ways (in foster families, extended family networks, etc.). Systems should be established to protect children from abuse, and a code of conduct should be drawn up and applied. An adequate number of male and female staff should be available to deal with the differing needs of boys and girls. \n Staff should be trained in prevention of and response to gender-based violence and exploitation involving children, norms of confidentiality, child psychosocial development, tracing and reunification. \n ICCs should only accommodate children under 18. Some flexibility can be considered, based on the best interests of the child, e.g., in relation to girl mothers with infants and children or on medical grounds, on a case-by-case basis. In addition, young children (under 14) should be separated from adolescents in order to avoid any risk of older children abusing younger ones. \n Sanitation and accommodation facilities should separate girls from boys and be sensitive to the needs of infants and girl mothers. \n ICCs should be located at a safe distance from conflict and recruitment areas; external access to the centre should be controlled. (For example, entry of adult combatants and fighters and the media can be disruptive, and can expose children to additional risks.) Security should be provided by peacekeepers or neutral forces.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -146179,7 +146179,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2391, - "Paragraph": "Management guidelines for Interim Care Centres \\n\\n The following management guidelines apply: \\n Child protection specialists, not military or other actors should manage the centres. \\n Children should only stay a limited amount of time in ICCs, and documentation and monitoring systems should be established to ensure that the length of stay is brief (weeks not months). \\n At the end of their stay, if family reunification is not feasible, provision should be made for children to be cared for in other ways (in foster families, extended family networks, etc.). Systems should be established to protect children from abuse, and a code of conduct should be drawn up and applied. An adequate number of male and female staff should be available to deal with the differing needs of boys and girls. \\n Staff should be trained in prevention of and response to gender-based violence and exploitation involving children, norms of confidentiality, child psychosocial development, tracing and reunification. \\n ICCs should only accommodate children under 18. Some flexibility can be considered, based on the best interests of the child, e.g., in relation to girl mothers with infants and children or on medical grounds, on a case-by-case basis. In addition, young children (under 14) should be separated from adolescents in order to avoid any risk of older children abusing younger ones. \\n Sanitation and accommodation facilities should separate girls from boys and be sensitive to the needs of infants and girl mothers. \\n ICCs should be located at a safe distance from conflict and recruitment areas; external access to the centre should be controlled. (For example, entry of adult combatants and fighters and the media can be disruptive, and can expose children to additional risks.) Security should be provided by peacekeepers or neutral forces.", + "Paragraph": "Management guidelines for Interim Care Centres \n\n The following management guidelines apply: \n Child protection specialists, not military or other actors should manage the centres. \n Children should only stay a limited amount of time in ICCs, and documentation and monitoring systems should be established to ensure that the length of stay is brief (weeks not months). \n At the end of their stay, if family reunification is not feasible, provision should be made for children to be cared for in other ways (in foster families, extended family networks, etc.). Systems should be established to protect children from abuse, and a code of conduct should be drawn up and applied. An adequate number of male and female staff should be available to deal with the differing needs of boys and girls. \n Staff should be trained in prevention of and response to gender-based violence and exploitation involving children, norms of confidentiality, child psychosocial development, tracing and reunification. \n ICCs should only accommodate children under 18. Some flexibility can be considered, based on the best interests of the child, e.g., in relation to girl mothers with infants and children or on medical grounds, on a case-by-case basis. In addition, young children (under 14) should be separated from adolescents in order to avoid any risk of older children abusing younger ones. \n Sanitation and accommodation facilities should separate girls from boys and be sensitive to the needs of infants and girl mothers. \n ICCs should be located at a safe distance from conflict and recruitment areas; external access to the centre should be controlled. (For example, entry of adult combatants and fighters and the media can be disruptive, and can expose children to additional risks.) Security should be provided by peacekeepers or neutral forces.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -146190,14 +146190,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Staff should be trained in prevention of and response to gender-based violence and exploitation involving children, norms of confidentiality, child psychosocial development, tracing and reunification.", + "Sentence": "\n Staff should be trained in prevention of and response to gender-based violence and exploitation involving children, norms of confidentiality, child psychosocial development, tracing and reunification.", "newParagraph": "management guideline interim care centre nn following management guideline apply n child protection specialist military actor manage centre n child stay limited amount time icc documentation monitoring system established ensure length stay brief week month n end stay family reunification feasible provision made child cared way foster family extended family network etc system established protect child abuse code conduct drawn applied adequate number male female staff available deal differing need boy girl n staff trained prevention response genderbased violence exploitation involving child norm confidentiality child psychosocial development tracing reunification n icc accommodate child 18 flexibility considered based best interest child eg relation girl mother infant child medical ground casebycase basis addition young child 14 separated adolescent order avoid risk older child abusing younger one n sanitation accommodation facility separate girl boy sensitive need infant girl mother n icc located safe distance conflict recruitment area external access centre controlled example entry adult combatant fighter medium disruptive expose child additional risk security provided peacekeeper neutral force", "ProcessedSent": "n staff trained prevention response genderbased violence exploitation involving child norm confidentiality child psychosocial development tracing reunification", "SentID": 8121 }, { "ParagraphID": 2391, - "Paragraph": "Management guidelines for Interim Care Centres \\n\\n The following management guidelines apply: \\n Child protection specialists, not military or other actors should manage the centres. \\n Children should only stay a limited amount of time in ICCs, and documentation and monitoring systems should be established to ensure that the length of stay is brief (weeks not months). \\n At the end of their stay, if family reunification is not feasible, provision should be made for children to be cared for in other ways (in foster families, extended family networks, etc.). Systems should be established to protect children from abuse, and a code of conduct should be drawn up and applied. An adequate number of male and female staff should be available to deal with the differing needs of boys and girls. \\n Staff should be trained in prevention of and response to gender-based violence and exploitation involving children, norms of confidentiality, child psychosocial development, tracing and reunification. \\n ICCs should only accommodate children under 18. Some flexibility can be considered, based on the best interests of the child, e.g., in relation to girl mothers with infants and children or on medical grounds, on a case-by-case basis. In addition, young children (under 14) should be separated from adolescents in order to avoid any risk of older children abusing younger ones. \\n Sanitation and accommodation facilities should separate girls from boys and be sensitive to the needs of infants and girl mothers. \\n ICCs should be located at a safe distance from conflict and recruitment areas; external access to the centre should be controlled. (For example, entry of adult combatants and fighters and the media can be disruptive, and can expose children to additional risks.) Security should be provided by peacekeepers or neutral forces.", + "Paragraph": "Management guidelines for Interim Care Centres \n\n The following management guidelines apply: \n Child protection specialists, not military or other actors should manage the centres. \n Children should only stay a limited amount of time in ICCs, and documentation and monitoring systems should be established to ensure that the length of stay is brief (weeks not months). \n At the end of their stay, if family reunification is not feasible, provision should be made for children to be cared for in other ways (in foster families, extended family networks, etc.). Systems should be established to protect children from abuse, and a code of conduct should be drawn up and applied. An adequate number of male and female staff should be available to deal with the differing needs of boys and girls. \n Staff should be trained in prevention of and response to gender-based violence and exploitation involving children, norms of confidentiality, child psychosocial development, tracing and reunification. \n ICCs should only accommodate children under 18. Some flexibility can be considered, based on the best interests of the child, e.g., in relation to girl mothers with infants and children or on medical grounds, on a case-by-case basis. In addition, young children (under 14) should be separated from adolescents in order to avoid any risk of older children abusing younger ones. \n Sanitation and accommodation facilities should separate girls from boys and be sensitive to the needs of infants and girl mothers. \n ICCs should be located at a safe distance from conflict and recruitment areas; external access to the centre should be controlled. (For example, entry of adult combatants and fighters and the media can be disruptive, and can expose children to additional risks.) Security should be provided by peacekeepers or neutral forces.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -146208,14 +146208,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n ICCs should only accommodate children under 18.", + "Sentence": "\n ICCs should only accommodate children under 18.", "newParagraph": "management guideline interim care centre nn following management guideline apply n child protection specialist military actor manage centre n child stay limited amount time icc documentation monitoring system established ensure length stay brief week month n end stay family reunification feasible provision made child cared way foster family extended family network etc system established protect child abuse code conduct drawn applied adequate number male female staff available deal differing need boy girl n staff trained prevention response genderbased violence exploitation involving child norm confidentiality child psychosocial development tracing reunification n icc accommodate child 18 flexibility considered based best interest child eg relation girl mother infant child medical ground casebycase basis addition young child 14 separated adolescent order avoid risk older child abusing younger one n sanitation accommodation facility separate girl boy sensitive need infant girl mother n icc located safe distance conflict recruitment area external access centre controlled example entry adult combatant fighter medium disruptive expose child additional risk security provided peacekeeper neutral force", "ProcessedSent": "n icc accommodate child 18", "SentID": 8122 }, { "ParagraphID": 2391, - "Paragraph": "Management guidelines for Interim Care Centres \\n\\n The following management guidelines apply: \\n Child protection specialists, not military or other actors should manage the centres. \\n Children should only stay a limited amount of time in ICCs, and documentation and monitoring systems should be established to ensure that the length of stay is brief (weeks not months). \\n At the end of their stay, if family reunification is not feasible, provision should be made for children to be cared for in other ways (in foster families, extended family networks, etc.). Systems should be established to protect children from abuse, and a code of conduct should be drawn up and applied. An adequate number of male and female staff should be available to deal with the differing needs of boys and girls. \\n Staff should be trained in prevention of and response to gender-based violence and exploitation involving children, norms of confidentiality, child psychosocial development, tracing and reunification. \\n ICCs should only accommodate children under 18. Some flexibility can be considered, based on the best interests of the child, e.g., in relation to girl mothers with infants and children or on medical grounds, on a case-by-case basis. In addition, young children (under 14) should be separated from adolescents in order to avoid any risk of older children abusing younger ones. \\n Sanitation and accommodation facilities should separate girls from boys and be sensitive to the needs of infants and girl mothers. \\n ICCs should be located at a safe distance from conflict and recruitment areas; external access to the centre should be controlled. (For example, entry of adult combatants and fighters and the media can be disruptive, and can expose children to additional risks.) Security should be provided by peacekeepers or neutral forces.", + "Paragraph": "Management guidelines for Interim Care Centres \n\n The following management guidelines apply: \n Child protection specialists, not military or other actors should manage the centres. \n Children should only stay a limited amount of time in ICCs, and documentation and monitoring systems should be established to ensure that the length of stay is brief (weeks not months). \n At the end of their stay, if family reunification is not feasible, provision should be made for children to be cared for in other ways (in foster families, extended family networks, etc.). Systems should be established to protect children from abuse, and a code of conduct should be drawn up and applied. An adequate number of male and female staff should be available to deal with the differing needs of boys and girls. \n Staff should be trained in prevention of and response to gender-based violence and exploitation involving children, norms of confidentiality, child psychosocial development, tracing and reunification. \n ICCs should only accommodate children under 18. Some flexibility can be considered, based on the best interests of the child, e.g., in relation to girl mothers with infants and children or on medical grounds, on a case-by-case basis. In addition, young children (under 14) should be separated from adolescents in order to avoid any risk of older children abusing younger ones. \n Sanitation and accommodation facilities should separate girls from boys and be sensitive to the needs of infants and girl mothers. \n ICCs should be located at a safe distance from conflict and recruitment areas; external access to the centre should be controlled. (For example, entry of adult combatants and fighters and the media can be disruptive, and can expose children to additional risks.) Security should be provided by peacekeepers or neutral forces.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -146233,7 +146233,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2391, - "Paragraph": "Management guidelines for Interim Care Centres \\n\\n The following management guidelines apply: \\n Child protection specialists, not military or other actors should manage the centres. \\n Children should only stay a limited amount of time in ICCs, and documentation and monitoring systems should be established to ensure that the length of stay is brief (weeks not months). \\n At the end of their stay, if family reunification is not feasible, provision should be made for children to be cared for in other ways (in foster families, extended family networks, etc.). Systems should be established to protect children from abuse, and a code of conduct should be drawn up and applied. An adequate number of male and female staff should be available to deal with the differing needs of boys and girls. \\n Staff should be trained in prevention of and response to gender-based violence and exploitation involving children, norms of confidentiality, child psychosocial development, tracing and reunification. \\n ICCs should only accommodate children under 18. Some flexibility can be considered, based on the best interests of the child, e.g., in relation to girl mothers with infants and children or on medical grounds, on a case-by-case basis. In addition, young children (under 14) should be separated from adolescents in order to avoid any risk of older children abusing younger ones. \\n Sanitation and accommodation facilities should separate girls from boys and be sensitive to the needs of infants and girl mothers. \\n ICCs should be located at a safe distance from conflict and recruitment areas; external access to the centre should be controlled. (For example, entry of adult combatants and fighters and the media can be disruptive, and can expose children to additional risks.) Security should be provided by peacekeepers or neutral forces.", + "Paragraph": "Management guidelines for Interim Care Centres \n\n The following management guidelines apply: \n Child protection specialists, not military or other actors should manage the centres. \n Children should only stay a limited amount of time in ICCs, and documentation and monitoring systems should be established to ensure that the length of stay is brief (weeks not months). \n At the end of their stay, if family reunification is not feasible, provision should be made for children to be cared for in other ways (in foster families, extended family networks, etc.). Systems should be established to protect children from abuse, and a code of conduct should be drawn up and applied. An adequate number of male and female staff should be available to deal with the differing needs of boys and girls. \n Staff should be trained in prevention of and response to gender-based violence and exploitation involving children, norms of confidentiality, child psychosocial development, tracing and reunification. \n ICCs should only accommodate children under 18. Some flexibility can be considered, based on the best interests of the child, e.g., in relation to girl mothers with infants and children or on medical grounds, on a case-by-case basis. In addition, young children (under 14) should be separated from adolescents in order to avoid any risk of older children abusing younger ones. \n Sanitation and accommodation facilities should separate girls from boys and be sensitive to the needs of infants and girl mothers. \n ICCs should be located at a safe distance from conflict and recruitment areas; external access to the centre should be controlled. (For example, entry of adult combatants and fighters and the media can be disruptive, and can expose children to additional risks.) Security should be provided by peacekeepers or neutral forces.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -146251,7 +146251,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2391, - "Paragraph": "Management guidelines for Interim Care Centres \\n\\n The following management guidelines apply: \\n Child protection specialists, not military or other actors should manage the centres. \\n Children should only stay a limited amount of time in ICCs, and documentation and monitoring systems should be established to ensure that the length of stay is brief (weeks not months). \\n At the end of their stay, if family reunification is not feasible, provision should be made for children to be cared for in other ways (in foster families, extended family networks, etc.). Systems should be established to protect children from abuse, and a code of conduct should be drawn up and applied. An adequate number of male and female staff should be available to deal with the differing needs of boys and girls. \\n Staff should be trained in prevention of and response to gender-based violence and exploitation involving children, norms of confidentiality, child psychosocial development, tracing and reunification. \\n ICCs should only accommodate children under 18. Some flexibility can be considered, based on the best interests of the child, e.g., in relation to girl mothers with infants and children or on medical grounds, on a case-by-case basis. In addition, young children (under 14) should be separated from adolescents in order to avoid any risk of older children abusing younger ones. \\n Sanitation and accommodation facilities should separate girls from boys and be sensitive to the needs of infants and girl mothers. \\n ICCs should be located at a safe distance from conflict and recruitment areas; external access to the centre should be controlled. (For example, entry of adult combatants and fighters and the media can be disruptive, and can expose children to additional risks.) Security should be provided by peacekeepers or neutral forces.", + "Paragraph": "Management guidelines for Interim Care Centres \n\n The following management guidelines apply: \n Child protection specialists, not military or other actors should manage the centres. \n Children should only stay a limited amount of time in ICCs, and documentation and monitoring systems should be established to ensure that the length of stay is brief (weeks not months). \n At the end of their stay, if family reunification is not feasible, provision should be made for children to be cared for in other ways (in foster families, extended family networks, etc.). Systems should be established to protect children from abuse, and a code of conduct should be drawn up and applied. An adequate number of male and female staff should be available to deal with the differing needs of boys and girls. \n Staff should be trained in prevention of and response to gender-based violence and exploitation involving children, norms of confidentiality, child psychosocial development, tracing and reunification. \n ICCs should only accommodate children under 18. Some flexibility can be considered, based on the best interests of the child, e.g., in relation to girl mothers with infants and children or on medical grounds, on a case-by-case basis. In addition, young children (under 14) should be separated from adolescents in order to avoid any risk of older children abusing younger ones. \n Sanitation and accommodation facilities should separate girls from boys and be sensitive to the needs of infants and girl mothers. \n ICCs should be located at a safe distance from conflict and recruitment areas; external access to the centre should be controlled. (For example, entry of adult combatants and fighters and the media can be disruptive, and can expose children to additional risks.) Security should be provided by peacekeepers or neutral forces.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -146262,14 +146262,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Sanitation and accommodation facilities should separate girls from boys and be sensitive to the needs of infants and girl mothers.", + "Sentence": "\n Sanitation and accommodation facilities should separate girls from boys and be sensitive to the needs of infants and girl mothers.", "newParagraph": "management guideline interim care centre nn following management guideline apply n child protection specialist military actor manage centre n child stay limited amount time icc documentation monitoring system established ensure length stay brief week month n end stay family reunification feasible provision made child cared way foster family extended family network etc system established protect child abuse code conduct drawn applied adequate number male female staff available deal differing need boy girl n staff trained prevention response genderbased violence exploitation involving child norm confidentiality child psychosocial development tracing reunification n icc accommodate child 18 flexibility considered based best interest child eg relation girl mother infant child medical ground casebycase basis addition young child 14 separated adolescent order avoid risk older child abusing younger one n sanitation accommodation facility separate girl boy sensitive need infant girl mother n icc located safe distance conflict recruitment area external access centre controlled example entry adult combatant fighter medium disruptive expose child additional risk security provided peacekeeper neutral force", "ProcessedSent": "n sanitation accommodation facility separate girl boy sensitive need infant girl mother", "SentID": 8125 }, { "ParagraphID": 2391, - "Paragraph": "Management guidelines for Interim Care Centres \\n\\n The following management guidelines apply: \\n Child protection specialists, not military or other actors should manage the centres. \\n Children should only stay a limited amount of time in ICCs, and documentation and monitoring systems should be established to ensure that the length of stay is brief (weeks not months). \\n At the end of their stay, if family reunification is not feasible, provision should be made for children to be cared for in other ways (in foster families, extended family networks, etc.). Systems should be established to protect children from abuse, and a code of conduct should be drawn up and applied. An adequate number of male and female staff should be available to deal with the differing needs of boys and girls. \\n Staff should be trained in prevention of and response to gender-based violence and exploitation involving children, norms of confidentiality, child psychosocial development, tracing and reunification. \\n ICCs should only accommodate children under 18. Some flexibility can be considered, based on the best interests of the child, e.g., in relation to girl mothers with infants and children or on medical grounds, on a case-by-case basis. In addition, young children (under 14) should be separated from adolescents in order to avoid any risk of older children abusing younger ones. \\n Sanitation and accommodation facilities should separate girls from boys and be sensitive to the needs of infants and girl mothers. \\n ICCs should be located at a safe distance from conflict and recruitment areas; external access to the centre should be controlled. (For example, entry of adult combatants and fighters and the media can be disruptive, and can expose children to additional risks.) Security should be provided by peacekeepers or neutral forces.", + "Paragraph": "Management guidelines for Interim Care Centres \n\n The following management guidelines apply: \n Child protection specialists, not military or other actors should manage the centres. \n Children should only stay a limited amount of time in ICCs, and documentation and monitoring systems should be established to ensure that the length of stay is brief (weeks not months). \n At the end of their stay, if family reunification is not feasible, provision should be made for children to be cared for in other ways (in foster families, extended family networks, etc.). Systems should be established to protect children from abuse, and a code of conduct should be drawn up and applied. An adequate number of male and female staff should be available to deal with the differing needs of boys and girls. \n Staff should be trained in prevention of and response to gender-based violence and exploitation involving children, norms of confidentiality, child psychosocial development, tracing and reunification. \n ICCs should only accommodate children under 18. Some flexibility can be considered, based on the best interests of the child, e.g., in relation to girl mothers with infants and children or on medical grounds, on a case-by-case basis. In addition, young children (under 14) should be separated from adolescents in order to avoid any risk of older children abusing younger ones. \n Sanitation and accommodation facilities should separate girls from boys and be sensitive to the needs of infants and girl mothers. \n ICCs should be located at a safe distance from conflict and recruitment areas; external access to the centre should be controlled. (For example, entry of adult combatants and fighters and the media can be disruptive, and can expose children to additional risks.) Security should be provided by peacekeepers or neutral forces.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -146280,14 +146280,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n ICCs should be located at a safe distance from conflict and recruitment areas; external access to the centre should be controlled.", + "Sentence": "\n ICCs should be located at a safe distance from conflict and recruitment areas; external access to the centre should be controlled.", "newParagraph": "management guideline interim care centre nn following management guideline apply n child protection specialist military actor manage centre n child stay limited amount time icc documentation monitoring system established ensure length stay brief week month n end stay family reunification feasible provision made child cared way foster family extended family network etc system established protect child abuse code conduct drawn applied adequate number male female staff available deal differing need boy girl n staff trained prevention response genderbased violence exploitation involving child norm confidentiality child psychosocial development tracing reunification n icc accommodate child 18 flexibility considered based best interest child eg relation girl mother infant child medical ground casebycase basis addition young child 14 separated adolescent order avoid risk older child abusing younger one n sanitation accommodation facility separate girl boy sensitive need infant girl mother n icc located safe distance conflict recruitment area external access centre controlled example entry adult combatant fighter medium disruptive expose child additional risk security provided peacekeeper neutral force", "ProcessedSent": "n icc located safe distance conflict recruitment area external access centre controlled", "SentID": 8126 }, { "ParagraphID": 2391, - "Paragraph": "Management guidelines for Interim Care Centres \\n\\n The following management guidelines apply: \\n Child protection specialists, not military or other actors should manage the centres. \\n Children should only stay a limited amount of time in ICCs, and documentation and monitoring systems should be established to ensure that the length of stay is brief (weeks not months). \\n At the end of their stay, if family reunification is not feasible, provision should be made for children to be cared for in other ways (in foster families, extended family networks, etc.). Systems should be established to protect children from abuse, and a code of conduct should be drawn up and applied. An adequate number of male and female staff should be available to deal with the differing needs of boys and girls. \\n Staff should be trained in prevention of and response to gender-based violence and exploitation involving children, norms of confidentiality, child psychosocial development, tracing and reunification. \\n ICCs should only accommodate children under 18. Some flexibility can be considered, based on the best interests of the child, e.g., in relation to girl mothers with infants and children or on medical grounds, on a case-by-case basis. In addition, young children (under 14) should be separated from adolescents in order to avoid any risk of older children abusing younger ones. \\n Sanitation and accommodation facilities should separate girls from boys and be sensitive to the needs of infants and girl mothers. \\n ICCs should be located at a safe distance from conflict and recruitment areas; external access to the centre should be controlled. (For example, entry of adult combatants and fighters and the media can be disruptive, and can expose children to additional risks.) Security should be provided by peacekeepers or neutral forces.", + "Paragraph": "Management guidelines for Interim Care Centres \n\n The following management guidelines apply: \n Child protection specialists, not military or other actors should manage the centres. \n Children should only stay a limited amount of time in ICCs, and documentation and monitoring systems should be established to ensure that the length of stay is brief (weeks not months). \n At the end of their stay, if family reunification is not feasible, provision should be made for children to be cared for in other ways (in foster families, extended family networks, etc.). Systems should be established to protect children from abuse, and a code of conduct should be drawn up and applied. An adequate number of male and female staff should be available to deal with the differing needs of boys and girls. \n Staff should be trained in prevention of and response to gender-based violence and exploitation involving children, norms of confidentiality, child psychosocial development, tracing and reunification. \n ICCs should only accommodate children under 18. Some flexibility can be considered, based on the best interests of the child, e.g., in relation to girl mothers with infants and children or on medical grounds, on a case-by-case basis. In addition, young children (under 14) should be separated from adolescents in order to avoid any risk of older children abusing younger ones. \n Sanitation and accommodation facilities should separate girls from boys and be sensitive to the needs of infants and girl mothers. \n ICCs should be located at a safe distance from conflict and recruitment areas; external access to the centre should be controlled. (For example, entry of adult combatants and fighters and the media can be disruptive, and can expose children to additional risks.) Security should be provided by peacekeepers or neutral forces.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -146305,7 +146305,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2391, - "Paragraph": "Management guidelines for Interim Care Centres \\n\\n The following management guidelines apply: \\n Child protection specialists, not military or other actors should manage the centres. \\n Children should only stay a limited amount of time in ICCs, and documentation and monitoring systems should be established to ensure that the length of stay is brief (weeks not months). \\n At the end of their stay, if family reunification is not feasible, provision should be made for children to be cared for in other ways (in foster families, extended family networks, etc.). Systems should be established to protect children from abuse, and a code of conduct should be drawn up and applied. An adequate number of male and female staff should be available to deal with the differing needs of boys and girls. \\n Staff should be trained in prevention of and response to gender-based violence and exploitation involving children, norms of confidentiality, child psychosocial development, tracing and reunification. \\n ICCs should only accommodate children under 18. Some flexibility can be considered, based on the best interests of the child, e.g., in relation to girl mothers with infants and children or on medical grounds, on a case-by-case basis. In addition, young children (under 14) should be separated from adolescents in order to avoid any risk of older children abusing younger ones. \\n Sanitation and accommodation facilities should separate girls from boys and be sensitive to the needs of infants and girl mothers. \\n ICCs should be located at a safe distance from conflict and recruitment areas; external access to the centre should be controlled. (For example, entry of adult combatants and fighters and the media can be disruptive, and can expose children to additional risks.) Security should be provided by peacekeepers or neutral forces.", + "Paragraph": "Management guidelines for Interim Care Centres \n\n The following management guidelines apply: \n Child protection specialists, not military or other actors should manage the centres. \n Children should only stay a limited amount of time in ICCs, and documentation and monitoring systems should be established to ensure that the length of stay is brief (weeks not months). \n At the end of their stay, if family reunification is not feasible, provision should be made for children to be cared for in other ways (in foster families, extended family networks, etc.). Systems should be established to protect children from abuse, and a code of conduct should be drawn up and applied. An adequate number of male and female staff should be available to deal with the differing needs of boys and girls. \n Staff should be trained in prevention of and response to gender-based violence and exploitation involving children, norms of confidentiality, child psychosocial development, tracing and reunification. \n ICCs should only accommodate children under 18. Some flexibility can be considered, based on the best interests of the child, e.g., in relation to girl mothers with infants and children or on medical grounds, on a case-by-case basis. In addition, young children (under 14) should be separated from adolescents in order to avoid any risk of older children abusing younger ones. \n Sanitation and accommodation facilities should separate girls from boys and be sensitive to the needs of infants and girl mothers. \n ICCs should be located at a safe distance from conflict and recruitment areas; external access to the centre should be controlled. (For example, entry of adult combatants and fighters and the media can be disruptive, and can expose children to additional risks.) Security should be provided by peacekeepers or neutral forces.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -146323,7 +146323,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2392, - "Paragraph": "Activity guidelines \\n\\n Tracing, verification, reunification and monitoring should be carried out. \\nTemporary care should take place within a community-based tracing and reintegration programme to assist the return of children to their communities (including community outreach), and to encourage the protection and development of war-affected children in general. Experience has showed that when only care is offered, centres present a risk of children becoming \u2018institutionalized\u2019 and dependent. \\nHealth check-ups and specialized health services should be provided when necessary (e.g., reproductive health and antenatal services, diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections, voluntary and confidential HIV testing with appropriate psychosocial support, and health care for nutritional deficiencies and war-related injuries). \\nBasic psychosocial counselling should be provided, including help to overcome trauma and develop self-esteem and life skills. \\nInformation and guidance should be provided on the reintegration opportunities available. \\nActivities should focus on restoring the social norms and routines of civilian life; age- and gender-appropriate sports, cultural and recreational activities should be provided. \\nCommunity sensitization should be carried out before the child\u2019s arrival. \\nFormal education or training activities should not be provided at the ICC; however, literacy testing can be conducted. \\nCommunities near the ICC should be sensitized about the ICC\u2019s role. Children in the centres should be encouraged to participate in community activities to encourage trust. During temporary care, peace education should be part of everyday life as well as the formal programmes, and cover key principles, objectives, and values related to the non-violent resolution of conflict.", + "Paragraph": "Activity guidelines \n\n Tracing, verification, reunification and monitoring should be carried out. \nTemporary care should take place within a community-based tracing and reintegration programme to assist the return of children to their communities (including community outreach), and to encourage the protection and development of war-affected children in general. Experience has showed that when only care is offered, centres present a risk of children becoming \u2018institutionalized\u2019 and dependent. \nHealth check-ups and specialized health services should be provided when necessary (e.g., reproductive health and antenatal services, diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections, voluntary and confidential HIV testing with appropriate psychosocial support, and health care for nutritional deficiencies and war-related injuries). \nBasic psychosocial counselling should be provided, including help to overcome trauma and develop self-esteem and life skills. \nInformation and guidance should be provided on the reintegration opportunities available. \nActivities should focus on restoring the social norms and routines of civilian life; age- and gender-appropriate sports, cultural and recreational activities should be provided. \nCommunity sensitization should be carried out before the child\u2019s arrival. \nFormal education or training activities should not be provided at the ICC; however, literacy testing can be conducted. \nCommunities near the ICC should be sensitized about the ICC\u2019s role. Children in the centres should be encouraged to participate in community activities to encourage trust. During temporary care, peace education should be part of everyday life as well as the formal programmes, and cover key principles, objectives, and values related to the non-violent resolution of conflict.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -146334,14 +146334,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Activity guidelines \\n\\n Tracing, verification, reunification and monitoring should be carried out.", + "Sentence": "Activity guidelines \n\n Tracing, verification, reunification and monitoring should be carried out.", "newParagraph": "activity guideline nn tracing verification reunification monitoring carried ntemporary care take place within communitybased tracing reintegration programme assist return child community including community outreach encourage protection development waraffected child general experience showed care offered centre present risk child becoming institutionalized dependent nhealth checkup specialized health service provided necessary eg reproductive health antenatal service diagnosis sexually transmitted infection voluntary confidential hiv testing appropriate psychosocial support health care nutritional deficiency warrelated injury nbasic psychosocial counselling provided including help overcome trauma develop selfesteem life skill ninformation guidance provided reintegration opportunity available nactivities focus restoring social norm routine civilian life age genderappropriate sport cultural recreational activity provided ncommunity sensitization carried child arrival nformal education training activity provided icc however literacy testing conducted ncommunities near icc sensitized icc role child centre encouraged participate community activity encourage trust temporary care peace education part everyday life well formal programme cover key principle objective value related nonviolent resolution conflict", "ProcessedSent": "activity guideline nn tracing verification reunification monitoring carried", "SentID": 8129 }, { "ParagraphID": 2392, - "Paragraph": "Activity guidelines \\n\\n Tracing, verification, reunification and monitoring should be carried out. \\nTemporary care should take place within a community-based tracing and reintegration programme to assist the return of children to their communities (including community outreach), and to encourage the protection and development of war-affected children in general. Experience has showed that when only care is offered, centres present a risk of children becoming \u2018institutionalized\u2019 and dependent. \\nHealth check-ups and specialized health services should be provided when necessary (e.g., reproductive health and antenatal services, diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections, voluntary and confidential HIV testing with appropriate psychosocial support, and health care for nutritional deficiencies and war-related injuries). \\nBasic psychosocial counselling should be provided, including help to overcome trauma and develop self-esteem and life skills. \\nInformation and guidance should be provided on the reintegration opportunities available. \\nActivities should focus on restoring the social norms and routines of civilian life; age- and gender-appropriate sports, cultural and recreational activities should be provided. \\nCommunity sensitization should be carried out before the child\u2019s arrival. \\nFormal education or training activities should not be provided at the ICC; however, literacy testing can be conducted. \\nCommunities near the ICC should be sensitized about the ICC\u2019s role. Children in the centres should be encouraged to participate in community activities to encourage trust. During temporary care, peace education should be part of everyday life as well as the formal programmes, and cover key principles, objectives, and values related to the non-violent resolution of conflict.", + "Paragraph": "Activity guidelines \n\n Tracing, verification, reunification and monitoring should be carried out. \nTemporary care should take place within a community-based tracing and reintegration programme to assist the return of children to their communities (including community outreach), and to encourage the protection and development of war-affected children in general. Experience has showed that when only care is offered, centres present a risk of children becoming \u2018institutionalized\u2019 and dependent. \nHealth check-ups and specialized health services should be provided when necessary (e.g., reproductive health and antenatal services, diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections, voluntary and confidential HIV testing with appropriate psychosocial support, and health care for nutritional deficiencies and war-related injuries). \nBasic psychosocial counselling should be provided, including help to overcome trauma and develop self-esteem and life skills. \nInformation and guidance should be provided on the reintegration opportunities available. \nActivities should focus on restoring the social norms and routines of civilian life; age- and gender-appropriate sports, cultural and recreational activities should be provided. \nCommunity sensitization should be carried out before the child\u2019s arrival. \nFormal education or training activities should not be provided at the ICC; however, literacy testing can be conducted. \nCommunities near the ICC should be sensitized about the ICC\u2019s role. Children in the centres should be encouraged to participate in community activities to encourage trust. During temporary care, peace education should be part of everyday life as well as the formal programmes, and cover key principles, objectives, and values related to the non-violent resolution of conflict.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -146352,14 +146352,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nTemporary care should take place within a community-based tracing and reintegration programme to assist the return of children to their communities (including community outreach), and to encourage the protection and development of war-affected children in general.", + "Sentence": "\nTemporary care should take place within a community-based tracing and reintegration programme to assist the return of children to their communities (including community outreach), and to encourage the protection and development of war-affected children in general.", "newParagraph": "activity guideline nn tracing verification reunification monitoring carried ntemporary care take place within communitybased tracing reintegration programme assist return child community including community outreach encourage protection development waraffected child general experience showed care offered centre present risk child becoming institutionalized dependent nhealth checkup specialized health service provided necessary eg reproductive health antenatal service diagnosis sexually transmitted infection voluntary confidential hiv testing appropriate psychosocial support health care nutritional deficiency warrelated injury nbasic psychosocial counselling provided including help overcome trauma develop selfesteem life skill ninformation guidance provided reintegration opportunity available nactivities focus restoring social norm routine civilian life age genderappropriate sport cultural recreational activity provided ncommunity sensitization carried child arrival nformal education training activity provided icc however literacy testing conducted ncommunities near icc sensitized icc role child centre encouraged participate community activity encourage trust temporary care peace education part everyday life well formal programme cover key principle objective value related nonviolent resolution conflict", "ProcessedSent": "ntemporary care take place within communitybased tracing reintegration programme assist return child community including community outreach encourage protection development waraffected child general", "SentID": 8130 }, { "ParagraphID": 2392, - "Paragraph": "Activity guidelines \\n\\n Tracing, verification, reunification and monitoring should be carried out. \\nTemporary care should take place within a community-based tracing and reintegration programme to assist the return of children to their communities (including community outreach), and to encourage the protection and development of war-affected children in general. Experience has showed that when only care is offered, centres present a risk of children becoming \u2018institutionalized\u2019 and dependent. \\nHealth check-ups and specialized health services should be provided when necessary (e.g., reproductive health and antenatal services, diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections, voluntary and confidential HIV testing with appropriate psychosocial support, and health care for nutritional deficiencies and war-related injuries). \\nBasic psychosocial counselling should be provided, including help to overcome trauma and develop self-esteem and life skills. \\nInformation and guidance should be provided on the reintegration opportunities available. \\nActivities should focus on restoring the social norms and routines of civilian life; age- and gender-appropriate sports, cultural and recreational activities should be provided. \\nCommunity sensitization should be carried out before the child\u2019s arrival. \\nFormal education or training activities should not be provided at the ICC; however, literacy testing can be conducted. \\nCommunities near the ICC should be sensitized about the ICC\u2019s role. Children in the centres should be encouraged to participate in community activities to encourage trust. During temporary care, peace education should be part of everyday life as well as the formal programmes, and cover key principles, objectives, and values related to the non-violent resolution of conflict.", + "Paragraph": "Activity guidelines \n\n Tracing, verification, reunification and monitoring should be carried out. \nTemporary care should take place within a community-based tracing and reintegration programme to assist the return of children to their communities (including community outreach), and to encourage the protection and development of war-affected children in general. Experience has showed that when only care is offered, centres present a risk of children becoming \u2018institutionalized\u2019 and dependent. \nHealth check-ups and specialized health services should be provided when necessary (e.g., reproductive health and antenatal services, diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections, voluntary and confidential HIV testing with appropriate psychosocial support, and health care for nutritional deficiencies and war-related injuries). \nBasic psychosocial counselling should be provided, including help to overcome trauma and develop self-esteem and life skills. \nInformation and guidance should be provided on the reintegration opportunities available. \nActivities should focus on restoring the social norms and routines of civilian life; age- and gender-appropriate sports, cultural and recreational activities should be provided. \nCommunity sensitization should be carried out before the child\u2019s arrival. \nFormal education or training activities should not be provided at the ICC; however, literacy testing can be conducted. \nCommunities near the ICC should be sensitized about the ICC\u2019s role. Children in the centres should be encouraged to participate in community activities to encourage trust. During temporary care, peace education should be part of everyday life as well as the formal programmes, and cover key principles, objectives, and values related to the non-violent resolution of conflict.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -146377,7 +146377,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2392, - "Paragraph": "Activity guidelines \\n\\n Tracing, verification, reunification and monitoring should be carried out. \\nTemporary care should take place within a community-based tracing and reintegration programme to assist the return of children to their communities (including community outreach), and to encourage the protection and development of war-affected children in general. Experience has showed that when only care is offered, centres present a risk of children becoming \u2018institutionalized\u2019 and dependent. \\nHealth check-ups and specialized health services should be provided when necessary (e.g., reproductive health and antenatal services, diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections, voluntary and confidential HIV testing with appropriate psychosocial support, and health care for nutritional deficiencies and war-related injuries). \\nBasic psychosocial counselling should be provided, including help to overcome trauma and develop self-esteem and life skills. \\nInformation and guidance should be provided on the reintegration opportunities available. \\nActivities should focus on restoring the social norms and routines of civilian life; age- and gender-appropriate sports, cultural and recreational activities should be provided. \\nCommunity sensitization should be carried out before the child\u2019s arrival. \\nFormal education or training activities should not be provided at the ICC; however, literacy testing can be conducted. \\nCommunities near the ICC should be sensitized about the ICC\u2019s role. Children in the centres should be encouraged to participate in community activities to encourage trust. During temporary care, peace education should be part of everyday life as well as the formal programmes, and cover key principles, objectives, and values related to the non-violent resolution of conflict.", + "Paragraph": "Activity guidelines \n\n Tracing, verification, reunification and monitoring should be carried out. \nTemporary care should take place within a community-based tracing and reintegration programme to assist the return of children to their communities (including community outreach), and to encourage the protection and development of war-affected children in general. Experience has showed that when only care is offered, centres present a risk of children becoming \u2018institutionalized\u2019 and dependent. \nHealth check-ups and specialized health services should be provided when necessary (e.g., reproductive health and antenatal services, diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections, voluntary and confidential HIV testing with appropriate psychosocial support, and health care for nutritional deficiencies and war-related injuries). \nBasic psychosocial counselling should be provided, including help to overcome trauma and develop self-esteem and life skills. \nInformation and guidance should be provided on the reintegration opportunities available. \nActivities should focus on restoring the social norms and routines of civilian life; age- and gender-appropriate sports, cultural and recreational activities should be provided. \nCommunity sensitization should be carried out before the child\u2019s arrival. \nFormal education or training activities should not be provided at the ICC; however, literacy testing can be conducted. \nCommunities near the ICC should be sensitized about the ICC\u2019s role. Children in the centres should be encouraged to participate in community activities to encourage trust. During temporary care, peace education should be part of everyday life as well as the formal programmes, and cover key principles, objectives, and values related to the non-violent resolution of conflict.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -146388,14 +146388,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nHealth check-ups and specialized health services should be provided when necessary (e.g., reproductive health and antenatal services, diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections, voluntary and confidential HIV testing with appropriate psychosocial support, and health care for nutritional deficiencies and war-related injuries).", + "Sentence": "\nHealth check-ups and specialized health services should be provided when necessary (e.g., reproductive health and antenatal services, diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections, voluntary and confidential HIV testing with appropriate psychosocial support, and health care for nutritional deficiencies and war-related injuries).", "newParagraph": "activity guideline nn tracing verification reunification monitoring carried ntemporary care take place within communitybased tracing reintegration programme assist return child community including community outreach encourage protection development waraffected child general experience showed care offered centre present risk child becoming institutionalized dependent nhealth checkup specialized health service provided necessary eg reproductive health antenatal service diagnosis sexually transmitted infection voluntary confidential hiv testing appropriate psychosocial support health care nutritional deficiency warrelated injury nbasic psychosocial counselling provided including help overcome trauma develop selfesteem life skill ninformation guidance provided reintegration opportunity available nactivities focus restoring social norm routine civilian life age genderappropriate sport cultural recreational activity provided ncommunity sensitization carried child arrival nformal education training activity provided icc however literacy testing conducted ncommunities near icc sensitized icc role child centre encouraged participate community activity encourage trust temporary care peace education part everyday life well formal programme cover key principle objective value related nonviolent resolution conflict", "ProcessedSent": "nhealth checkup specialized health service provided necessary eg reproductive health antenatal service diagnosis sexually transmitted infection voluntary confidential hiv testing appropriate psychosocial support health care nutritional deficiency warrelated injury", "SentID": 8132 }, { "ParagraphID": 2392, - "Paragraph": "Activity guidelines \\n\\n Tracing, verification, reunification and monitoring should be carried out. \\nTemporary care should take place within a community-based tracing and reintegration programme to assist the return of children to their communities (including community outreach), and to encourage the protection and development of war-affected children in general. Experience has showed that when only care is offered, centres present a risk of children becoming \u2018institutionalized\u2019 and dependent. \\nHealth check-ups and specialized health services should be provided when necessary (e.g., reproductive health and antenatal services, diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections, voluntary and confidential HIV testing with appropriate psychosocial support, and health care for nutritional deficiencies and war-related injuries). \\nBasic psychosocial counselling should be provided, including help to overcome trauma and develop self-esteem and life skills. \\nInformation and guidance should be provided on the reintegration opportunities available. \\nActivities should focus on restoring the social norms and routines of civilian life; age- and gender-appropriate sports, cultural and recreational activities should be provided. \\nCommunity sensitization should be carried out before the child\u2019s arrival. \\nFormal education or training activities should not be provided at the ICC; however, literacy testing can be conducted. \\nCommunities near the ICC should be sensitized about the ICC\u2019s role. Children in the centres should be encouraged to participate in community activities to encourage trust. During temporary care, peace education should be part of everyday life as well as the formal programmes, and cover key principles, objectives, and values related to the non-violent resolution of conflict.", + "Paragraph": "Activity guidelines \n\n Tracing, verification, reunification and monitoring should be carried out. \nTemporary care should take place within a community-based tracing and reintegration programme to assist the return of children to their communities (including community outreach), and to encourage the protection and development of war-affected children in general. Experience has showed that when only care is offered, centres present a risk of children becoming \u2018institutionalized\u2019 and dependent. \nHealth check-ups and specialized health services should be provided when necessary (e.g., reproductive health and antenatal services, diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections, voluntary and confidential HIV testing with appropriate psychosocial support, and health care for nutritional deficiencies and war-related injuries). \nBasic psychosocial counselling should be provided, including help to overcome trauma and develop self-esteem and life skills. \nInformation and guidance should be provided on the reintegration opportunities available. \nActivities should focus on restoring the social norms and routines of civilian life; age- and gender-appropriate sports, cultural and recreational activities should be provided. \nCommunity sensitization should be carried out before the child\u2019s arrival. \nFormal education or training activities should not be provided at the ICC; however, literacy testing can be conducted. \nCommunities near the ICC should be sensitized about the ICC\u2019s role. Children in the centres should be encouraged to participate in community activities to encourage trust. During temporary care, peace education should be part of everyday life as well as the formal programmes, and cover key principles, objectives, and values related to the non-violent resolution of conflict.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -146406,14 +146406,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nBasic psychosocial counselling should be provided, including help to overcome trauma and develop self-esteem and life skills.", + "Sentence": "\nBasic psychosocial counselling should be provided, including help to overcome trauma and develop self-esteem and life skills.", "newParagraph": "activity guideline nn tracing verification reunification monitoring carried ntemporary care take place within communitybased tracing reintegration programme assist return child community including community outreach encourage protection development waraffected child general experience showed care offered centre present risk child becoming institutionalized dependent nhealth checkup specialized health service provided necessary eg reproductive health antenatal service diagnosis sexually transmitted infection voluntary confidential hiv testing appropriate psychosocial support health care nutritional deficiency warrelated injury nbasic psychosocial counselling provided including help overcome trauma develop selfesteem life skill ninformation guidance provided reintegration opportunity available nactivities focus restoring social norm routine civilian life age genderappropriate sport cultural recreational activity provided ncommunity sensitization carried child arrival nformal education training activity provided icc however literacy testing conducted ncommunities near icc sensitized icc role child centre encouraged participate community activity encourage trust temporary care peace education part everyday life well formal programme cover key principle objective value related nonviolent resolution conflict", "ProcessedSent": "nbasic psychosocial counselling provided including help overcome trauma develop selfesteem life skill", "SentID": 8133 }, { "ParagraphID": 2392, - "Paragraph": "Activity guidelines \\n\\n Tracing, verification, reunification and monitoring should be carried out. \\nTemporary care should take place within a community-based tracing and reintegration programme to assist the return of children to their communities (including community outreach), and to encourage the protection and development of war-affected children in general. Experience has showed that when only care is offered, centres present a risk of children becoming \u2018institutionalized\u2019 and dependent. \\nHealth check-ups and specialized health services should be provided when necessary (e.g., reproductive health and antenatal services, diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections, voluntary and confidential HIV testing with appropriate psychosocial support, and health care for nutritional deficiencies and war-related injuries). \\nBasic psychosocial counselling should be provided, including help to overcome trauma and develop self-esteem and life skills. \\nInformation and guidance should be provided on the reintegration opportunities available. \\nActivities should focus on restoring the social norms and routines of civilian life; age- and gender-appropriate sports, cultural and recreational activities should be provided. \\nCommunity sensitization should be carried out before the child\u2019s arrival. \\nFormal education or training activities should not be provided at the ICC; however, literacy testing can be conducted. \\nCommunities near the ICC should be sensitized about the ICC\u2019s role. Children in the centres should be encouraged to participate in community activities to encourage trust. During temporary care, peace education should be part of everyday life as well as the formal programmes, and cover key principles, objectives, and values related to the non-violent resolution of conflict.", + "Paragraph": "Activity guidelines \n\n Tracing, verification, reunification and monitoring should be carried out. \nTemporary care should take place within a community-based tracing and reintegration programme to assist the return of children to their communities (including community outreach), and to encourage the protection and development of war-affected children in general. Experience has showed that when only care is offered, centres present a risk of children becoming \u2018institutionalized\u2019 and dependent. \nHealth check-ups and specialized health services should be provided when necessary (e.g., reproductive health and antenatal services, diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections, voluntary and confidential HIV testing with appropriate psychosocial support, and health care for nutritional deficiencies and war-related injuries). \nBasic psychosocial counselling should be provided, including help to overcome trauma and develop self-esteem and life skills. \nInformation and guidance should be provided on the reintegration opportunities available. \nActivities should focus on restoring the social norms and routines of civilian life; age- and gender-appropriate sports, cultural and recreational activities should be provided. \nCommunity sensitization should be carried out before the child\u2019s arrival. \nFormal education or training activities should not be provided at the ICC; however, literacy testing can be conducted. \nCommunities near the ICC should be sensitized about the ICC\u2019s role. Children in the centres should be encouraged to participate in community activities to encourage trust. During temporary care, peace education should be part of everyday life as well as the formal programmes, and cover key principles, objectives, and values related to the non-violent resolution of conflict.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -146424,14 +146424,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nInformation and guidance should be provided on the reintegration opportunities available.", + "Sentence": "\nInformation and guidance should be provided on the reintegration opportunities available.", "newParagraph": "activity guideline nn tracing verification reunification monitoring carried ntemporary care take place within communitybased tracing reintegration programme assist return child community including community outreach encourage protection development waraffected child general experience showed care offered centre present risk child becoming institutionalized dependent nhealth checkup specialized health service provided necessary eg reproductive health antenatal service diagnosis sexually transmitted infection voluntary confidential hiv testing appropriate psychosocial support health care nutritional deficiency warrelated injury nbasic psychosocial counselling provided including help overcome trauma develop selfesteem life skill ninformation guidance provided reintegration opportunity available nactivities focus restoring social norm routine civilian life age genderappropriate sport cultural recreational activity provided ncommunity sensitization carried child arrival nformal education training activity provided icc however literacy testing conducted ncommunities near icc sensitized icc role child centre encouraged participate community activity encourage trust temporary care peace education part everyday life well formal programme cover key principle objective value related nonviolent resolution conflict", "ProcessedSent": "ninformation guidance provided reintegration opportunity available", "SentID": 8134 }, { "ParagraphID": 2392, - "Paragraph": "Activity guidelines \\n\\n Tracing, verification, reunification and monitoring should be carried out. \\nTemporary care should take place within a community-based tracing and reintegration programme to assist the return of children to their communities (including community outreach), and to encourage the protection and development of war-affected children in general. Experience has showed that when only care is offered, centres present a risk of children becoming \u2018institutionalized\u2019 and dependent. \\nHealth check-ups and specialized health services should be provided when necessary (e.g., reproductive health and antenatal services, diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections, voluntary and confidential HIV testing with appropriate psychosocial support, and health care for nutritional deficiencies and war-related injuries). \\nBasic psychosocial counselling should be provided, including help to overcome trauma and develop self-esteem and life skills. \\nInformation and guidance should be provided on the reintegration opportunities available. \\nActivities should focus on restoring the social norms and routines of civilian life; age- and gender-appropriate sports, cultural and recreational activities should be provided. \\nCommunity sensitization should be carried out before the child\u2019s arrival. \\nFormal education or training activities should not be provided at the ICC; however, literacy testing can be conducted. \\nCommunities near the ICC should be sensitized about the ICC\u2019s role. Children in the centres should be encouraged to participate in community activities to encourage trust. During temporary care, peace education should be part of everyday life as well as the formal programmes, and cover key principles, objectives, and values related to the non-violent resolution of conflict.", + "Paragraph": "Activity guidelines \n\n Tracing, verification, reunification and monitoring should be carried out. \nTemporary care should take place within a community-based tracing and reintegration programme to assist the return of children to their communities (including community outreach), and to encourage the protection and development of war-affected children in general. Experience has showed that when only care is offered, centres present a risk of children becoming \u2018institutionalized\u2019 and dependent. \nHealth check-ups and specialized health services should be provided when necessary (e.g., reproductive health and antenatal services, diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections, voluntary and confidential HIV testing with appropriate psychosocial support, and health care for nutritional deficiencies and war-related injuries). \nBasic psychosocial counselling should be provided, including help to overcome trauma and develop self-esteem and life skills. \nInformation and guidance should be provided on the reintegration opportunities available. \nActivities should focus on restoring the social norms and routines of civilian life; age- and gender-appropriate sports, cultural and recreational activities should be provided. \nCommunity sensitization should be carried out before the child\u2019s arrival. \nFormal education or training activities should not be provided at the ICC; however, literacy testing can be conducted. \nCommunities near the ICC should be sensitized about the ICC\u2019s role. Children in the centres should be encouraged to participate in community activities to encourage trust. During temporary care, peace education should be part of everyday life as well as the formal programmes, and cover key principles, objectives, and values related to the non-violent resolution of conflict.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -146442,14 +146442,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nActivities should focus on restoring the social norms and routines of civilian life; age- and gender-appropriate sports, cultural and recreational activities should be provided.", + "Sentence": "\nActivities should focus on restoring the social norms and routines of civilian life; age- and gender-appropriate sports, cultural and recreational activities should be provided.", "newParagraph": "activity guideline nn tracing verification reunification monitoring carried ntemporary care take place within communitybased tracing reintegration programme assist return child community including community outreach encourage protection development waraffected child general experience showed care offered centre present risk child becoming institutionalized dependent nhealth checkup specialized health service provided necessary eg reproductive health antenatal service diagnosis sexually transmitted infection voluntary confidential hiv testing appropriate psychosocial support health care nutritional deficiency warrelated injury nbasic psychosocial counselling provided including help overcome trauma develop selfesteem life skill ninformation guidance provided reintegration opportunity available nactivities focus restoring social norm routine civilian life age genderappropriate sport cultural recreational activity provided ncommunity sensitization carried child arrival nformal education training activity provided icc however literacy testing conducted ncommunities near icc sensitized icc role child centre encouraged participate community activity encourage trust temporary care peace education part everyday life well formal programme cover key principle objective value related nonviolent resolution conflict", "ProcessedSent": "nactivities focus restoring social norm routine civilian life age genderappropriate sport cultural recreational activity provided", "SentID": 8135 }, { "ParagraphID": 2392, - "Paragraph": "Activity guidelines \\n\\n Tracing, verification, reunification and monitoring should be carried out. \\nTemporary care should take place within a community-based tracing and reintegration programme to assist the return of children to their communities (including community outreach), and to encourage the protection and development of war-affected children in general. Experience has showed that when only care is offered, centres present a risk of children becoming \u2018institutionalized\u2019 and dependent. \\nHealth check-ups and specialized health services should be provided when necessary (e.g., reproductive health and antenatal services, diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections, voluntary and confidential HIV testing with appropriate psychosocial support, and health care for nutritional deficiencies and war-related injuries). \\nBasic psychosocial counselling should be provided, including help to overcome trauma and develop self-esteem and life skills. \\nInformation and guidance should be provided on the reintegration opportunities available. \\nActivities should focus on restoring the social norms and routines of civilian life; age- and gender-appropriate sports, cultural and recreational activities should be provided. \\nCommunity sensitization should be carried out before the child\u2019s arrival. \\nFormal education or training activities should not be provided at the ICC; however, literacy testing can be conducted. \\nCommunities near the ICC should be sensitized about the ICC\u2019s role. Children in the centres should be encouraged to participate in community activities to encourage trust. During temporary care, peace education should be part of everyday life as well as the formal programmes, and cover key principles, objectives, and values related to the non-violent resolution of conflict.", + "Paragraph": "Activity guidelines \n\n Tracing, verification, reunification and monitoring should be carried out. \nTemporary care should take place within a community-based tracing and reintegration programme to assist the return of children to their communities (including community outreach), and to encourage the protection and development of war-affected children in general. Experience has showed that when only care is offered, centres present a risk of children becoming \u2018institutionalized\u2019 and dependent. \nHealth check-ups and specialized health services should be provided when necessary (e.g., reproductive health and antenatal services, diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections, voluntary and confidential HIV testing with appropriate psychosocial support, and health care for nutritional deficiencies and war-related injuries). \nBasic psychosocial counselling should be provided, including help to overcome trauma and develop self-esteem and life skills. \nInformation and guidance should be provided on the reintegration opportunities available. \nActivities should focus on restoring the social norms and routines of civilian life; age- and gender-appropriate sports, cultural and recreational activities should be provided. \nCommunity sensitization should be carried out before the child\u2019s arrival. \nFormal education or training activities should not be provided at the ICC; however, literacy testing can be conducted. \nCommunities near the ICC should be sensitized about the ICC\u2019s role. Children in the centres should be encouraged to participate in community activities to encourage trust. During temporary care, peace education should be part of everyday life as well as the formal programmes, and cover key principles, objectives, and values related to the non-violent resolution of conflict.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -146460,14 +146460,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nCommunity sensitization should be carried out before the child\u2019s arrival.", + "Sentence": "\nCommunity sensitization should be carried out before the child\u2019s arrival.", "newParagraph": "activity guideline nn tracing verification reunification monitoring carried ntemporary care take place within communitybased tracing reintegration programme assist return child community including community outreach encourage protection development waraffected child general experience showed care offered centre present risk child becoming institutionalized dependent nhealth checkup specialized health service provided necessary eg reproductive health antenatal service diagnosis sexually transmitted infection voluntary confidential hiv testing appropriate psychosocial support health care nutritional deficiency warrelated injury nbasic psychosocial counselling provided including help overcome trauma develop selfesteem life skill ninformation guidance provided reintegration opportunity available nactivities focus restoring social norm routine civilian life age genderappropriate sport cultural recreational activity provided ncommunity sensitization carried child arrival nformal education training activity provided icc however literacy testing conducted ncommunities near icc sensitized icc role child centre encouraged participate community activity encourage trust temporary care peace education part everyday life well formal programme cover key principle objective value related nonviolent resolution conflict", "ProcessedSent": "ncommunity sensitization carried child arrival", "SentID": 8136 }, { "ParagraphID": 2392, - "Paragraph": "Activity guidelines \\n\\n Tracing, verification, reunification and monitoring should be carried out. \\nTemporary care should take place within a community-based tracing and reintegration programme to assist the return of children to their communities (including community outreach), and to encourage the protection and development of war-affected children in general. Experience has showed that when only care is offered, centres present a risk of children becoming \u2018institutionalized\u2019 and dependent. \\nHealth check-ups and specialized health services should be provided when necessary (e.g., reproductive health and antenatal services, diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections, voluntary and confidential HIV testing with appropriate psychosocial support, and health care for nutritional deficiencies and war-related injuries). \\nBasic psychosocial counselling should be provided, including help to overcome trauma and develop self-esteem and life skills. \\nInformation and guidance should be provided on the reintegration opportunities available. \\nActivities should focus on restoring the social norms and routines of civilian life; age- and gender-appropriate sports, cultural and recreational activities should be provided. \\nCommunity sensitization should be carried out before the child\u2019s arrival. \\nFormal education or training activities should not be provided at the ICC; however, literacy testing can be conducted. \\nCommunities near the ICC should be sensitized about the ICC\u2019s role. Children in the centres should be encouraged to participate in community activities to encourage trust. During temporary care, peace education should be part of everyday life as well as the formal programmes, and cover key principles, objectives, and values related to the non-violent resolution of conflict.", + "Paragraph": "Activity guidelines \n\n Tracing, verification, reunification and monitoring should be carried out. \nTemporary care should take place within a community-based tracing and reintegration programme to assist the return of children to their communities (including community outreach), and to encourage the protection and development of war-affected children in general. Experience has showed that when only care is offered, centres present a risk of children becoming \u2018institutionalized\u2019 and dependent. \nHealth check-ups and specialized health services should be provided when necessary (e.g., reproductive health and antenatal services, diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections, voluntary and confidential HIV testing with appropriate psychosocial support, and health care for nutritional deficiencies and war-related injuries). \nBasic psychosocial counselling should be provided, including help to overcome trauma and develop self-esteem and life skills. \nInformation and guidance should be provided on the reintegration opportunities available. \nActivities should focus on restoring the social norms and routines of civilian life; age- and gender-appropriate sports, cultural and recreational activities should be provided. \nCommunity sensitization should be carried out before the child\u2019s arrival. \nFormal education or training activities should not be provided at the ICC; however, literacy testing can be conducted. \nCommunities near the ICC should be sensitized about the ICC\u2019s role. Children in the centres should be encouraged to participate in community activities to encourage trust. During temporary care, peace education should be part of everyday life as well as the formal programmes, and cover key principles, objectives, and values related to the non-violent resolution of conflict.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -146478,14 +146478,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nFormal education or training activities should not be provided at the ICC; however, literacy testing can be conducted.", + "Sentence": "\nFormal education or training activities should not be provided at the ICC; however, literacy testing can be conducted.", "newParagraph": "activity guideline nn tracing verification reunification monitoring carried ntemporary care take place within communitybased tracing reintegration programme assist return child community including community outreach encourage protection development waraffected child general experience showed care offered centre present risk child becoming institutionalized dependent nhealth checkup specialized health service provided necessary eg reproductive health antenatal service diagnosis sexually transmitted infection voluntary confidential hiv testing appropriate psychosocial support health care nutritional deficiency warrelated injury nbasic psychosocial counselling provided including help overcome trauma develop selfesteem life skill ninformation guidance provided reintegration opportunity available nactivities focus restoring social norm routine civilian life age genderappropriate sport cultural recreational activity provided ncommunity sensitization carried child arrival nformal education training activity provided icc however literacy testing conducted ncommunities near icc sensitized icc role child centre encouraged participate community activity encourage trust temporary care peace education part everyday life well formal programme cover key principle objective value related nonviolent resolution conflict", "ProcessedSent": "nformal education training activity provided icc however literacy testing conducted", "SentID": 8137 }, { "ParagraphID": 2392, - "Paragraph": "Activity guidelines \\n\\n Tracing, verification, reunification and monitoring should be carried out. \\nTemporary care should take place within a community-based tracing and reintegration programme to assist the return of children to their communities (including community outreach), and to encourage the protection and development of war-affected children in general. Experience has showed that when only care is offered, centres present a risk of children becoming \u2018institutionalized\u2019 and dependent. \\nHealth check-ups and specialized health services should be provided when necessary (e.g., reproductive health and antenatal services, diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections, voluntary and confidential HIV testing with appropriate psychosocial support, and health care for nutritional deficiencies and war-related injuries). \\nBasic psychosocial counselling should be provided, including help to overcome trauma and develop self-esteem and life skills. \\nInformation and guidance should be provided on the reintegration opportunities available. \\nActivities should focus on restoring the social norms and routines of civilian life; age- and gender-appropriate sports, cultural and recreational activities should be provided. \\nCommunity sensitization should be carried out before the child\u2019s arrival. \\nFormal education or training activities should not be provided at the ICC; however, literacy testing can be conducted. \\nCommunities near the ICC should be sensitized about the ICC\u2019s role. Children in the centres should be encouraged to participate in community activities to encourage trust. During temporary care, peace education should be part of everyday life as well as the formal programmes, and cover key principles, objectives, and values related to the non-violent resolution of conflict.", + "Paragraph": "Activity guidelines \n\n Tracing, verification, reunification and monitoring should be carried out. \nTemporary care should take place within a community-based tracing and reintegration programme to assist the return of children to their communities (including community outreach), and to encourage the protection and development of war-affected children in general. Experience has showed that when only care is offered, centres present a risk of children becoming \u2018institutionalized\u2019 and dependent. \nHealth check-ups and specialized health services should be provided when necessary (e.g., reproductive health and antenatal services, diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections, voluntary and confidential HIV testing with appropriate psychosocial support, and health care for nutritional deficiencies and war-related injuries). \nBasic psychosocial counselling should be provided, including help to overcome trauma and develop self-esteem and life skills. \nInformation and guidance should be provided on the reintegration opportunities available. \nActivities should focus on restoring the social norms and routines of civilian life; age- and gender-appropriate sports, cultural and recreational activities should be provided. \nCommunity sensitization should be carried out before the child\u2019s arrival. \nFormal education or training activities should not be provided at the ICC; however, literacy testing can be conducted. \nCommunities near the ICC should be sensitized about the ICC\u2019s role. Children in the centres should be encouraged to participate in community activities to encourage trust. During temporary care, peace education should be part of everyday life as well as the formal programmes, and cover key principles, objectives, and values related to the non-violent resolution of conflict.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -146496,14 +146496,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nCommunities near the ICC should be sensitized about the ICC\u2019s role.", + "Sentence": "\nCommunities near the ICC should be sensitized about the ICC\u2019s role.", "newParagraph": "activity guideline nn tracing verification reunification monitoring carried ntemporary care take place within communitybased tracing reintegration programme assist return child community including community outreach encourage protection development waraffected child general experience showed care offered centre present risk child becoming institutionalized dependent nhealth checkup specialized health service provided necessary eg reproductive health antenatal service diagnosis sexually transmitted infection voluntary confidential hiv testing appropriate psychosocial support health care nutritional deficiency warrelated injury nbasic psychosocial counselling provided including help overcome trauma develop selfesteem life skill ninformation guidance provided reintegration opportunity available nactivities focus restoring social norm routine civilian life age genderappropriate sport cultural recreational activity provided ncommunity sensitization carried child arrival nformal education training activity provided icc however literacy testing conducted ncommunities near icc sensitized icc role child centre encouraged participate community activity encourage trust temporary care peace education part everyday life well formal programme cover key principle objective value related nonviolent resolution conflict", "ProcessedSent": "ncommunities near icc sensitized icc role", "SentID": 8138 }, { "ParagraphID": 2392, - "Paragraph": "Activity guidelines \\n\\n Tracing, verification, reunification and monitoring should be carried out. \\nTemporary care should take place within a community-based tracing and reintegration programme to assist the return of children to their communities (including community outreach), and to encourage the protection and development of war-affected children in general. Experience has showed that when only care is offered, centres present a risk of children becoming \u2018institutionalized\u2019 and dependent. \\nHealth check-ups and specialized health services should be provided when necessary (e.g., reproductive health and antenatal services, diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections, voluntary and confidential HIV testing with appropriate psychosocial support, and health care for nutritional deficiencies and war-related injuries). \\nBasic psychosocial counselling should be provided, including help to overcome trauma and develop self-esteem and life skills. \\nInformation and guidance should be provided on the reintegration opportunities available. \\nActivities should focus on restoring the social norms and routines of civilian life; age- and gender-appropriate sports, cultural and recreational activities should be provided. \\nCommunity sensitization should be carried out before the child\u2019s arrival. \\nFormal education or training activities should not be provided at the ICC; however, literacy testing can be conducted. \\nCommunities near the ICC should be sensitized about the ICC\u2019s role. Children in the centres should be encouraged to participate in community activities to encourage trust. During temporary care, peace education should be part of everyday life as well as the formal programmes, and cover key principles, objectives, and values related to the non-violent resolution of conflict.", + "Paragraph": "Activity guidelines \n\n Tracing, verification, reunification and monitoring should be carried out. \nTemporary care should take place within a community-based tracing and reintegration programme to assist the return of children to their communities (including community outreach), and to encourage the protection and development of war-affected children in general. Experience has showed that when only care is offered, centres present a risk of children becoming \u2018institutionalized\u2019 and dependent. \nHealth check-ups and specialized health services should be provided when necessary (e.g., reproductive health and antenatal services, diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections, voluntary and confidential HIV testing with appropriate psychosocial support, and health care for nutritional deficiencies and war-related injuries). \nBasic psychosocial counselling should be provided, including help to overcome trauma and develop self-esteem and life skills. \nInformation and guidance should be provided on the reintegration opportunities available. \nActivities should focus on restoring the social norms and routines of civilian life; age- and gender-appropriate sports, cultural and recreational activities should be provided. \nCommunity sensitization should be carried out before the child\u2019s arrival. \nFormal education or training activities should not be provided at the ICC; however, literacy testing can be conducted. \nCommunities near the ICC should be sensitized about the ICC\u2019s role. Children in the centres should be encouraged to participate in community activities to encourage trust. During temporary care, peace education should be part of everyday life as well as the formal programmes, and cover key principles, objectives, and values related to the non-violent resolution of conflict.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -146521,7 +146521,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2392, - "Paragraph": "Activity guidelines \\n\\n Tracing, verification, reunification and monitoring should be carried out. \\nTemporary care should take place within a community-based tracing and reintegration programme to assist the return of children to their communities (including community outreach), and to encourage the protection and development of war-affected children in general. Experience has showed that when only care is offered, centres present a risk of children becoming \u2018institutionalized\u2019 and dependent. \\nHealth check-ups and specialized health services should be provided when necessary (e.g., reproductive health and antenatal services, diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections, voluntary and confidential HIV testing with appropriate psychosocial support, and health care for nutritional deficiencies and war-related injuries). \\nBasic psychosocial counselling should be provided, including help to overcome trauma and develop self-esteem and life skills. \\nInformation and guidance should be provided on the reintegration opportunities available. \\nActivities should focus on restoring the social norms and routines of civilian life; age- and gender-appropriate sports, cultural and recreational activities should be provided. \\nCommunity sensitization should be carried out before the child\u2019s arrival. \\nFormal education or training activities should not be provided at the ICC; however, literacy testing can be conducted. \\nCommunities near the ICC should be sensitized about the ICC\u2019s role. Children in the centres should be encouraged to participate in community activities to encourage trust. During temporary care, peace education should be part of everyday life as well as the formal programmes, and cover key principles, objectives, and values related to the non-violent resolution of conflict.", + "Paragraph": "Activity guidelines \n\n Tracing, verification, reunification and monitoring should be carried out. \nTemporary care should take place within a community-based tracing and reintegration programme to assist the return of children to their communities (including community outreach), and to encourage the protection and development of war-affected children in general. Experience has showed that when only care is offered, centres present a risk of children becoming \u2018institutionalized\u2019 and dependent. \nHealth check-ups and specialized health services should be provided when necessary (e.g., reproductive health and antenatal services, diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections, voluntary and confidential HIV testing with appropriate psychosocial support, and health care for nutritional deficiencies and war-related injuries). \nBasic psychosocial counselling should be provided, including help to overcome trauma and develop self-esteem and life skills. \nInformation and guidance should be provided on the reintegration opportunities available. \nActivities should focus on restoring the social norms and routines of civilian life; age- and gender-appropriate sports, cultural and recreational activities should be provided. \nCommunity sensitization should be carried out before the child\u2019s arrival. \nFormal education or training activities should not be provided at the ICC; however, literacy testing can be conducted. \nCommunities near the ICC should be sensitized about the ICC\u2019s role. Children in the centres should be encouraged to participate in community activities to encourage trust. During temporary care, peace education should be part of everyday life as well as the formal programmes, and cover key principles, objectives, and values related to the non-violent resolution of conflict.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -146539,7 +146539,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2393, - "Paragraph": "Additional Resources: \\n United Nations Guidelines for Alternative Care, A\/Res\/64\/142 (24 Feb 2010) \\n Care in Emergencies Toolkit, Interagency Working Group on Unaccompanied and Separated Children (2013). \\n Field Handbook on Unaccompanied and Separated Children, Alliance for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action (2016) \\n Toolkit on Unaccompanied and Separated Children, Alliance for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action (2017) \\n Child Safeguarding Standards and How to Implement Them, Keeping Children Safe (2014) \\n Protection from Sexual Exploitation and Abuse Task Force online resources \\n Guidelines for Justice in Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime (2009).", + "Paragraph": "Additional Resources: \n United Nations Guidelines for Alternative Care, A\/Res\/64\/142 (24 Feb 2010) \n Care in Emergencies Toolkit, Interagency Working Group on Unaccompanied and Separated Children (2013). \n Field Handbook on Unaccompanied and Separated Children, Alliance for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action (2016) \n Toolkit on Unaccompanied and Separated Children, Alliance for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action (2017) \n Child Safeguarding Standards and How to Implement Them, Keeping Children Safe (2014) \n Protection from Sexual Exploitation and Abuse Task Force online resources \n Guidelines for Justice in Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime (2009).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -146550,14 +146550,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Additional Resources: \\n United Nations Guidelines for Alternative Care, A\/Res\/64\/142 (24 Feb 2010) \\n Care in Emergencies Toolkit, Interagency Working Group on Unaccompanied and Separated Children (2013).", + "Sentence": "Additional Resources: \n United Nations Guidelines for Alternative Care, A\/Res\/64\/142 (24 Feb 2010) \n Care in Emergencies Toolkit, Interagency Working Group on Unaccompanied and Separated Children (2013).", "newParagraph": "additional resource n united nation guideline alternative care ares64142 24 feb 2010 n care emergency toolkit interagency working group unaccompanied separated child 2013 n field handbook unaccompanied separated child alliance child protection humanitarian action 2016 n toolkit unaccompanied separated child alliance child protection humanitarian action 2017 n child safeguarding standard implement keeping child safe 2014 n protection sexual exploitation abuse task force online resource n guideline justice matter involving child victim witness crime 2009", "ProcessedSent": "additional resource n united nation guideline alternative care ares64142 24 feb 2010 n care emergency toolkit interagency working group unaccompanied separated child 2013", "SentID": 8141 }, { "ParagraphID": 2393, - "Paragraph": "Additional Resources: \\n United Nations Guidelines for Alternative Care, A\/Res\/64\/142 (24 Feb 2010) \\n Care in Emergencies Toolkit, Interagency Working Group on Unaccompanied and Separated Children (2013). \\n Field Handbook on Unaccompanied and Separated Children, Alliance for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action (2016) \\n Toolkit on Unaccompanied and Separated Children, Alliance for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action (2017) \\n Child Safeguarding Standards and How to Implement Them, Keeping Children Safe (2014) \\n Protection from Sexual Exploitation and Abuse Task Force online resources \\n Guidelines for Justice in Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime (2009).", + "Paragraph": "Additional Resources: \n United Nations Guidelines for Alternative Care, A\/Res\/64\/142 (24 Feb 2010) \n Care in Emergencies Toolkit, Interagency Working Group on Unaccompanied and Separated Children (2013). \n Field Handbook on Unaccompanied and Separated Children, Alliance for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action (2016) \n Toolkit on Unaccompanied and Separated Children, Alliance for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action (2017) \n Child Safeguarding Standards and How to Implement Them, Keeping Children Safe (2014) \n Protection from Sexual Exploitation and Abuse Task Force online resources \n Guidelines for Justice in Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime (2009).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -146568,7 +146568,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Field Handbook on Unaccompanied and Separated Children, Alliance for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action (2016) \\n Toolkit on Unaccompanied and Separated Children, Alliance for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action (2017) \\n Child Safeguarding Standards and How to Implement Them, Keeping Children Safe (2014) \\n Protection from Sexual Exploitation and Abuse Task Force online resources \\n Guidelines for Justice in Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime (2009).", + "Sentence": "\n Field Handbook on Unaccompanied and Separated Children, Alliance for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action (2016) \n Toolkit on Unaccompanied and Separated Children, Alliance for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action (2017) \n Child Safeguarding Standards and How to Implement Them, Keeping Children Safe (2014) \n Protection from Sexual Exploitation and Abuse Task Force online resources \n Guidelines for Justice in Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime (2009).", "newParagraph": "additional resource n united nation guideline alternative care ares64142 24 feb 2010 n care emergency toolkit interagency working group unaccompanied separated child 2013 n field handbook unaccompanied separated child alliance child protection humanitarian action 2016 n toolkit unaccompanied separated child alliance child protection humanitarian action 2017 n child safeguarding standard implement keeping child safe 2014 n protection sexual exploitation abuse task force online resource n guideline justice matter involving child victim witness crime 2009", "ProcessedSent": "n field handbook unaccompanied separated child alliance child protection humanitarian action 2016 n toolkit unaccompanied separated child alliance child protection humanitarian action 2017 n child safeguarding standard implement keeping child safe 2014 n protection sexual exploitation abuse task force online resource n guideline justice matter involving child victim witness crime 2009", "SentID": 8142 @@ -146935,7 +146935,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2399, - "Paragraph": "This module aims to provide DDR practitioners with guidance on the planning, design and implementation of youth-focused DDR processes in both mission and non-mission contexts. The main objectives of this guidance are: \\n To set out the main principles that guide aspects of DDR processes for Youth. \\n To provide guidance and key considerations to drive continuous efforts to prevent the recruitment and re-recruitment of youth into armed forces and groups. \\n To provide guidance on youth-focused approaches to DDR and reintegration support highlighting critical personal, social, political, and economic factors.", + "Paragraph": "This module aims to provide DDR practitioners with guidance on the planning, design and implementation of youth-focused DDR processes in both mission and non-mission contexts. The main objectives of this guidance are: \n To set out the main principles that guide aspects of DDR processes for Youth. \n To provide guidance and key considerations to drive continuous efforts to prevent the recruitment and re-recruitment of youth into armed forces and groups. \n To provide guidance on youth-focused approaches to DDR and reintegration support highlighting critical personal, social, political, and economic factors.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -146953,7 +146953,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2399, - "Paragraph": "This module aims to provide DDR practitioners with guidance on the planning, design and implementation of youth-focused DDR processes in both mission and non-mission contexts. The main objectives of this guidance are: \\n To set out the main principles that guide aspects of DDR processes for Youth. \\n To provide guidance and key considerations to drive continuous efforts to prevent the recruitment and re-recruitment of youth into armed forces and groups. \\n To provide guidance on youth-focused approaches to DDR and reintegration support highlighting critical personal, social, political, and economic factors.", + "Paragraph": "This module aims to provide DDR practitioners with guidance on the planning, design and implementation of youth-focused DDR processes in both mission and non-mission contexts. The main objectives of this guidance are: \n To set out the main principles that guide aspects of DDR processes for Youth. \n To provide guidance and key considerations to drive continuous efforts to prevent the recruitment and re-recruitment of youth into armed forces and groups. \n To provide guidance on youth-focused approaches to DDR and reintegration support highlighting critical personal, social, political, and economic factors.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -146964,14 +146964,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The main objectives of this guidance are: \\n To set out the main principles that guide aspects of DDR processes for Youth.", + "Sentence": "The main objectives of this guidance are: \n To set out the main principles that guide aspects of DDR processes for Youth.", "newParagraph": "module aim provide ddr practitioner guidance planning design implementation youthfocused ddr process mission nonmission context main objective guidance n set main principle guide aspect ddr process youth n provide guidance key consideration drive continuous effort prevent recruitment rerecruitment youth armed force group n provide guidance youthfocused approach ddr reintegration support highlighting critical personal social political economic factor", "ProcessedSent": "main objective guidance n set main principle guide aspect ddr process youth", "SentID": 8164 }, { "ParagraphID": 2399, - "Paragraph": "This module aims to provide DDR practitioners with guidance on the planning, design and implementation of youth-focused DDR processes in both mission and non-mission contexts. The main objectives of this guidance are: \\n To set out the main principles that guide aspects of DDR processes for Youth. \\n To provide guidance and key considerations to drive continuous efforts to prevent the recruitment and re-recruitment of youth into armed forces and groups. \\n To provide guidance on youth-focused approaches to DDR and reintegration support highlighting critical personal, social, political, and economic factors.", + "Paragraph": "This module aims to provide DDR practitioners with guidance on the planning, design and implementation of youth-focused DDR processes in both mission and non-mission contexts. The main objectives of this guidance are: \n To set out the main principles that guide aspects of DDR processes for Youth. \n To provide guidance and key considerations to drive continuous efforts to prevent the recruitment and re-recruitment of youth into armed forces and groups. \n To provide guidance on youth-focused approaches to DDR and reintegration support highlighting critical personal, social, political, and economic factors.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -146982,14 +146982,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n To provide guidance and key considerations to drive continuous efforts to prevent the recruitment and re-recruitment of youth into armed forces and groups.", + "Sentence": "\n To provide guidance and key considerations to drive continuous efforts to prevent the recruitment and re-recruitment of youth into armed forces and groups.", "newParagraph": "module aim provide ddr practitioner guidance planning design implementation youthfocused ddr process mission nonmission context main objective guidance n set main principle guide aspect ddr process youth n provide guidance key consideration drive continuous effort prevent recruitment rerecruitment youth armed force group n provide guidance youthfocused approach ddr reintegration support highlighting critical personal social political economic factor", "ProcessedSent": "n provide guidance key consideration drive continuous effort prevent recruitment rerecruitment youth armed force group", "SentID": 8165 }, { "ParagraphID": 2399, - "Paragraph": "This module aims to provide DDR practitioners with guidance on the planning, design and implementation of youth-focused DDR processes in both mission and non-mission contexts. The main objectives of this guidance are: \\n To set out the main principles that guide aspects of DDR processes for Youth. \\n To provide guidance and key considerations to drive continuous efforts to prevent the recruitment and re-recruitment of youth into armed forces and groups. \\n To provide guidance on youth-focused approaches to DDR and reintegration support highlighting critical personal, social, political, and economic factors.", + "Paragraph": "This module aims to provide DDR practitioners with guidance on the planning, design and implementation of youth-focused DDR processes in both mission and non-mission contexts. The main objectives of this guidance are: \n To set out the main principles that guide aspects of DDR processes for Youth. \n To provide guidance and key considerations to drive continuous efforts to prevent the recruitment and re-recruitment of youth into armed forces and groups. \n To provide guidance on youth-focused approaches to DDR and reintegration support highlighting critical personal, social, political, and economic factors.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -147000,7 +147000,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n To provide guidance on youth-focused approaches to DDR and reintegration support highlighting critical personal, social, political, and economic factors.", + "Sentence": "\n To provide guidance on youth-focused approaches to DDR and reintegration support highlighting critical personal, social, political, and economic factors.", "newParagraph": "module aim provide ddr practitioner guidance planning design implementation youthfocused ddr process mission nonmission context main objective guidance n set main principle guide aspect ddr process youth n provide guidance key consideration drive continuous effort prevent recruitment rerecruitment youth armed force group n provide guidance youthfocused approach ddr reintegration support highlighting critical personal social political economic factor", "ProcessedSent": "n provide guidance youthfocused approach ddr reintegration support highlighting critical personal social political economic factor", "SentID": 8166 @@ -147079,7 +147079,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2401, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -147097,7 +147097,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2401, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -147108,7 +147108,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may must used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "ProcessedSent": "use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "SentID": 8172 @@ -148339,7 +148339,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2419, - "Paragraph": "A youth-focused approach to DDR shall ensure that no harm is done to youth. Rather, DDR processes shall seek to maximize the benefit to youth, while minimizing any harm. This shall be done through: \\n Assessing and monitoring both positive and negative impacts for youth, and disaggregating data by age, gender and vulnerabilities of young people (while protecting youth\u2019s privacy) and where safe to do so, other social identities. \\n Listening to and taking account of the voices and views of youth in the planning, design, implementation and review of youth-focused DDR processes. \\n Leveraging opportunities for youth to promote peacebuilding and social cohesion through DDR including by building and fortifying stronger connections between youth, irrespective of the armed group or force they may have been traveling or associated with, including those in receiving communities.", + "Paragraph": "A youth-focused approach to DDR shall ensure that no harm is done to youth. Rather, DDR processes shall seek to maximize the benefit to youth, while minimizing any harm. This shall be done through: \n Assessing and monitoring both positive and negative impacts for youth, and disaggregating data by age, gender and vulnerabilities of young people (while protecting youth\u2019s privacy) and where safe to do so, other social identities. \n Listening to and taking account of the voices and views of youth in the planning, design, implementation and review of youth-focused DDR processes. \n Leveraging opportunities for youth to promote peacebuilding and social cohesion through DDR including by building and fortifying stronger connections between youth, irrespective of the armed group or force they may have been traveling or associated with, including those in receiving communities.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -148357,7 +148357,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2419, - "Paragraph": "A youth-focused approach to DDR shall ensure that no harm is done to youth. Rather, DDR processes shall seek to maximize the benefit to youth, while minimizing any harm. This shall be done through: \\n Assessing and monitoring both positive and negative impacts for youth, and disaggregating data by age, gender and vulnerabilities of young people (while protecting youth\u2019s privacy) and where safe to do so, other social identities. \\n Listening to and taking account of the voices and views of youth in the planning, design, implementation and review of youth-focused DDR processes. \\n Leveraging opportunities for youth to promote peacebuilding and social cohesion through DDR including by building and fortifying stronger connections between youth, irrespective of the armed group or force they may have been traveling or associated with, including those in receiving communities.", + "Paragraph": "A youth-focused approach to DDR shall ensure that no harm is done to youth. Rather, DDR processes shall seek to maximize the benefit to youth, while minimizing any harm. This shall be done through: \n Assessing and monitoring both positive and negative impacts for youth, and disaggregating data by age, gender and vulnerabilities of young people (while protecting youth\u2019s privacy) and where safe to do so, other social identities. \n Listening to and taking account of the voices and views of youth in the planning, design, implementation and review of youth-focused DDR processes. \n Leveraging opportunities for youth to promote peacebuilding and social cohesion through DDR including by building and fortifying stronger connections between youth, irrespective of the armed group or force they may have been traveling or associated with, including those in receiving communities.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -148375,7 +148375,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2419, - "Paragraph": "A youth-focused approach to DDR shall ensure that no harm is done to youth. Rather, DDR processes shall seek to maximize the benefit to youth, while minimizing any harm. This shall be done through: \\n Assessing and monitoring both positive and negative impacts for youth, and disaggregating data by age, gender and vulnerabilities of young people (while protecting youth\u2019s privacy) and where safe to do so, other social identities. \\n Listening to and taking account of the voices and views of youth in the planning, design, implementation and review of youth-focused DDR processes. \\n Leveraging opportunities for youth to promote peacebuilding and social cohesion through DDR including by building and fortifying stronger connections between youth, irrespective of the armed group or force they may have been traveling or associated with, including those in receiving communities.", + "Paragraph": "A youth-focused approach to DDR shall ensure that no harm is done to youth. Rather, DDR processes shall seek to maximize the benefit to youth, while minimizing any harm. This shall be done through: \n Assessing and monitoring both positive and negative impacts for youth, and disaggregating data by age, gender and vulnerabilities of young people (while protecting youth\u2019s privacy) and where safe to do so, other social identities. \n Listening to and taking account of the voices and views of youth in the planning, design, implementation and review of youth-focused DDR processes. \n Leveraging opportunities for youth to promote peacebuilding and social cohesion through DDR including by building and fortifying stronger connections between youth, irrespective of the armed group or force they may have been traveling or associated with, including those in receiving communities.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -148386,14 +148386,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.4 Conflict sensitive", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This shall be done through: \\n Assessing and monitoring both positive and negative impacts for youth, and disaggregating data by age, gender and vulnerabilities of young people (while protecting youth\u2019s privacy) and where safe to do so, other social identities.", + "Sentence": "This shall be done through: \n Assessing and monitoring both positive and negative impacts for youth, and disaggregating data by age, gender and vulnerabilities of young people (while protecting youth\u2019s privacy) and where safe to do so, other social identities.", "newParagraph": "youthfocused approach ddr shall ensure harm done youth rather ddr process shall seek maximize benefit youth minimizing harm shall done n assessing monitoring positive negative impact youth disaggregating data age gender vulnerability young people protecting youth privacy safe social identity n listening taking account voice view youth planning design implementation review youthfocused ddr process n leveraging opportunity youth promote peacebuilding social cohesion ddr including building fortifying stronger connection youth irrespective armed group force may traveling associated including receiving community", "ProcessedSent": "shall done n assessing monitoring positive negative impact youth disaggregating data age gender vulnerability young people protecting youth privacy safe social identity", "SentID": 8243 }, { "ParagraphID": 2419, - "Paragraph": "A youth-focused approach to DDR shall ensure that no harm is done to youth. Rather, DDR processes shall seek to maximize the benefit to youth, while minimizing any harm. This shall be done through: \\n Assessing and monitoring both positive and negative impacts for youth, and disaggregating data by age, gender and vulnerabilities of young people (while protecting youth\u2019s privacy) and where safe to do so, other social identities. \\n Listening to and taking account of the voices and views of youth in the planning, design, implementation and review of youth-focused DDR processes. \\n Leveraging opportunities for youth to promote peacebuilding and social cohesion through DDR including by building and fortifying stronger connections between youth, irrespective of the armed group or force they may have been traveling or associated with, including those in receiving communities.", + "Paragraph": "A youth-focused approach to DDR shall ensure that no harm is done to youth. Rather, DDR processes shall seek to maximize the benefit to youth, while minimizing any harm. This shall be done through: \n Assessing and monitoring both positive and negative impacts for youth, and disaggregating data by age, gender and vulnerabilities of young people (while protecting youth\u2019s privacy) and where safe to do so, other social identities. \n Listening to and taking account of the voices and views of youth in the planning, design, implementation and review of youth-focused DDR processes. \n Leveraging opportunities for youth to promote peacebuilding and social cohesion through DDR including by building and fortifying stronger connections between youth, irrespective of the armed group or force they may have been traveling or associated with, including those in receiving communities.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -148404,14 +148404,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.4 Conflict sensitive", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Listening to and taking account of the voices and views of youth in the planning, design, implementation and review of youth-focused DDR processes.", + "Sentence": "\n Listening to and taking account of the voices and views of youth in the planning, design, implementation and review of youth-focused DDR processes.", "newParagraph": "youthfocused approach ddr shall ensure harm done youth rather ddr process shall seek maximize benefit youth minimizing harm shall done n assessing monitoring positive negative impact youth disaggregating data age gender vulnerability young people protecting youth privacy safe social identity n listening taking account voice view youth planning design implementation review youthfocused ddr process n leveraging opportunity youth promote peacebuilding social cohesion ddr including building fortifying stronger connection youth irrespective armed group force may traveling associated including receiving community", "ProcessedSent": "n listening taking account voice view youth planning design implementation review youthfocused ddr process", "SentID": 8244 }, { "ParagraphID": 2419, - "Paragraph": "A youth-focused approach to DDR shall ensure that no harm is done to youth. Rather, DDR processes shall seek to maximize the benefit to youth, while minimizing any harm. This shall be done through: \\n Assessing and monitoring both positive and negative impacts for youth, and disaggregating data by age, gender and vulnerabilities of young people (while protecting youth\u2019s privacy) and where safe to do so, other social identities. \\n Listening to and taking account of the voices and views of youth in the planning, design, implementation and review of youth-focused DDR processes. \\n Leveraging opportunities for youth to promote peacebuilding and social cohesion through DDR including by building and fortifying stronger connections between youth, irrespective of the armed group or force they may have been traveling or associated with, including those in receiving communities.", + "Paragraph": "A youth-focused approach to DDR shall ensure that no harm is done to youth. Rather, DDR processes shall seek to maximize the benefit to youth, while minimizing any harm. This shall be done through: \n Assessing and monitoring both positive and negative impacts for youth, and disaggregating data by age, gender and vulnerabilities of young people (while protecting youth\u2019s privacy) and where safe to do so, other social identities. \n Listening to and taking account of the voices and views of youth in the planning, design, implementation and review of youth-focused DDR processes. \n Leveraging opportunities for youth to promote peacebuilding and social cohesion through DDR including by building and fortifying stronger connections between youth, irrespective of the armed group or force they may have been traveling or associated with, including those in receiving communities.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -148422,7 +148422,7 @@ "Heading2": "4.4 Conflict sensitive", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Leveraging opportunities for youth to promote peacebuilding and social cohesion through DDR including by building and fortifying stronger connections between youth, irrespective of the armed group or force they may have been traveling or associated with, including those in receiving communities.", + "Sentence": "\n Leveraging opportunities for youth to promote peacebuilding and social cohesion through DDR including by building and fortifying stronger connections between youth, irrespective of the armed group or force they may have been traveling or associated with, including those in receiving communities.", "newParagraph": "youthfocused approach ddr shall ensure harm done youth rather ddr process shall seek maximize benefit youth minimizing harm shall done n assessing monitoring positive negative impact youth disaggregating data age gender vulnerability young people protecting youth privacy safe social identity n listening taking account voice view youth planning design implementation review youthfocused ddr process n leveraging opportunity youth promote peacebuilding social cohesion ddr including building fortifying stronger connection youth irrespective armed group force may traveling associated including receiving community", "ProcessedSent": "n leveraging opportunity youth promote peacebuilding social cohesion ddr including building fortifying stronger connection youth irrespective armed group force may traveling associated including receiving community", "SentID": 8245 @@ -149509,7 +149509,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2438, - "Paragraph": "The inclusion of young women and girls in DDR processes is central to a gender- transformative approach, aimed at shifting social norms and addressing structural inequalities that lead young women and girls to engage in armed conflict and that negatively affect their reintegration. Within DDR processes, a gender-transformative approach shall focus on the following: \\n Agency: Interventions should strengthen the individual and collective capacities (knowledge and skills), attitudes, critical reflection, assets, actions and access to services that support the reintegration of young women and girls. \\n Relations: Interventions should equip young women and girls with the skills to navigate the expectations and cooperative or negotiation dynamics embedded within relationships between people in the home, market, community, and groups and organizations that will influence choice. Interventions should also engage men and boys to challenge gender inequities including through education and dialogue on gender norms, relations, violence and inequality, which can negatively impact women, men, children, families and societies. \\n Structures: Interventions should address the informal and formal institutional rules and practices, social norms and statuses that limit options available to young women and girls and work to create space for their empowerment. This will require engaging both female and male leaders including community and religious leaders.", + "Paragraph": "The inclusion of young women and girls in DDR processes is central to a gender- transformative approach, aimed at shifting social norms and addressing structural inequalities that lead young women and girls to engage in armed conflict and that negatively affect their reintegration. Within DDR processes, a gender-transformative approach shall focus on the following: \n Agency: Interventions should strengthen the individual and collective capacities (knowledge and skills), attitudes, critical reflection, assets, actions and access to services that support the reintegration of young women and girls. \n Relations: Interventions should equip young women and girls with the skills to navigate the expectations and cooperative or negotiation dynamics embedded within relationships between people in the home, market, community, and groups and organizations that will influence choice. Interventions should also engage men and boys to challenge gender inequities including through education and dialogue on gender norms, relations, violence and inequality, which can negatively impact women, men, children, families and societies. \n Structures: Interventions should address the informal and formal institutional rules and practices, social norms and statuses that limit options available to young women and girls and work to create space for their empowerment. This will require engaging both female and male leaders including community and religious leaders.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -149527,7 +149527,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2438, - "Paragraph": "The inclusion of young women and girls in DDR processes is central to a gender- transformative approach, aimed at shifting social norms and addressing structural inequalities that lead young women and girls to engage in armed conflict and that negatively affect their reintegration. Within DDR processes, a gender-transformative approach shall focus on the following: \\n Agency: Interventions should strengthen the individual and collective capacities (knowledge and skills), attitudes, critical reflection, assets, actions and access to services that support the reintegration of young women and girls. \\n Relations: Interventions should equip young women and girls with the skills to navigate the expectations and cooperative or negotiation dynamics embedded within relationships between people in the home, market, community, and groups and organizations that will influence choice. Interventions should also engage men and boys to challenge gender inequities including through education and dialogue on gender norms, relations, violence and inequality, which can negatively impact women, men, children, families and societies. \\n Structures: Interventions should address the informal and formal institutional rules and practices, social norms and statuses that limit options available to young women and girls and work to create space for their empowerment. This will require engaging both female and male leaders including community and religious leaders.", + "Paragraph": "The inclusion of young women and girls in DDR processes is central to a gender- transformative approach, aimed at shifting social norms and addressing structural inequalities that lead young women and girls to engage in armed conflict and that negatively affect their reintegration. Within DDR processes, a gender-transformative approach shall focus on the following: \n Agency: Interventions should strengthen the individual and collective capacities (knowledge and skills), attitudes, critical reflection, assets, actions and access to services that support the reintegration of young women and girls. \n Relations: Interventions should equip young women and girls with the skills to navigate the expectations and cooperative or negotiation dynamics embedded within relationships between people in the home, market, community, and groups and organizations that will influence choice. Interventions should also engage men and boys to challenge gender inequities including through education and dialogue on gender norms, relations, violence and inequality, which can negatively impact women, men, children, families and societies. \n Structures: Interventions should address the informal and formal institutional rules and practices, social norms and statuses that limit options available to young women and girls and work to create space for their empowerment. This will require engaging both female and male leaders including community and religious leaders.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -149538,14 +149538,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Gender responsive and transformative", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Within DDR processes, a gender-transformative approach shall focus on the following: \\n Agency: Interventions should strengthen the individual and collective capacities (knowledge and skills), attitudes, critical reflection, assets, actions and access to services that support the reintegration of young women and girls.", + "Sentence": "Within DDR processes, a gender-transformative approach shall focus on the following: \n Agency: Interventions should strengthen the individual and collective capacities (knowledge and skills), attitudes, critical reflection, assets, actions and access to services that support the reintegration of young women and girls.", "newParagraph": "inclusion young woman girl ddr process central gender transformative approach aimed shifting social norm addressing structural inequality lead young woman girl engage armed conflict negatively affect reintegration within ddr process gendertransformative approach shall focus following n agency intervention strengthen individual collective capacity knowledge skill attitude critical reflection asset action access service support reintegration young woman girl n relation intervention equip young woman girl skill navigate expectation cooperative negotiation dynamic embedded within relationship people home market community group organization influence choice intervention also engage men boy challenge gender inequity including education dialogue gender norm relation violence inequality negatively impact woman men child family society n structure intervention address informal formal institutional rule practice social norm status limit option available young woman girl work create space empowerment require engaging female male leader including community religious leader", "ProcessedSent": "within ddr process gendertransformative approach shall focus following n agency intervention strengthen individual collective capacity knowledge skill attitude critical reflection asset action access service support reintegration young woman girl", "SentID": 8307 }, { "ParagraphID": 2438, - "Paragraph": "The inclusion of young women and girls in DDR processes is central to a gender- transformative approach, aimed at shifting social norms and addressing structural inequalities that lead young women and girls to engage in armed conflict and that negatively affect their reintegration. Within DDR processes, a gender-transformative approach shall focus on the following: \\n Agency: Interventions should strengthen the individual and collective capacities (knowledge and skills), attitudes, critical reflection, assets, actions and access to services that support the reintegration of young women and girls. \\n Relations: Interventions should equip young women and girls with the skills to navigate the expectations and cooperative or negotiation dynamics embedded within relationships between people in the home, market, community, and groups and organizations that will influence choice. Interventions should also engage men and boys to challenge gender inequities including through education and dialogue on gender norms, relations, violence and inequality, which can negatively impact women, men, children, families and societies. \\n Structures: Interventions should address the informal and formal institutional rules and practices, social norms and statuses that limit options available to young women and girls and work to create space for their empowerment. This will require engaging both female and male leaders including community and religious leaders.", + "Paragraph": "The inclusion of young women and girls in DDR processes is central to a gender- transformative approach, aimed at shifting social norms and addressing structural inequalities that lead young women and girls to engage in armed conflict and that negatively affect their reintegration. Within DDR processes, a gender-transformative approach shall focus on the following: \n Agency: Interventions should strengthen the individual and collective capacities (knowledge and skills), attitudes, critical reflection, assets, actions and access to services that support the reintegration of young women and girls. \n Relations: Interventions should equip young women and girls with the skills to navigate the expectations and cooperative or negotiation dynamics embedded within relationships between people in the home, market, community, and groups and organizations that will influence choice. Interventions should also engage men and boys to challenge gender inequities including through education and dialogue on gender norms, relations, violence and inequality, which can negatively impact women, men, children, families and societies. \n Structures: Interventions should address the informal and formal institutional rules and practices, social norms and statuses that limit options available to young women and girls and work to create space for their empowerment. This will require engaging both female and male leaders including community and religious leaders.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -149556,14 +149556,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Gender responsive and transformative", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Relations: Interventions should equip young women and girls with the skills to navigate the expectations and cooperative or negotiation dynamics embedded within relationships between people in the home, market, community, and groups and organizations that will influence choice.", + "Sentence": "\n Relations: Interventions should equip young women and girls with the skills to navigate the expectations and cooperative or negotiation dynamics embedded within relationships between people in the home, market, community, and groups and organizations that will influence choice.", "newParagraph": "inclusion young woman girl ddr process central gender transformative approach aimed shifting social norm addressing structural inequality lead young woman girl engage armed conflict negatively affect reintegration within ddr process gendertransformative approach shall focus following n agency intervention strengthen individual collective capacity knowledge skill attitude critical reflection asset action access service support reintegration young woman girl n relation intervention equip young woman girl skill navigate expectation cooperative negotiation dynamic embedded within relationship people home market community group organization influence choice intervention also engage men boy challenge gender inequity including education dialogue gender norm relation violence inequality negatively impact woman men child family society n structure intervention address informal formal institutional rule practice social norm status limit option available young woman girl work create space empowerment require engaging female male leader including community religious leader", "ProcessedSent": "n relation intervention equip young woman girl skill navigate expectation cooperative negotiation dynamic embedded within relationship people home market community group organization influence choice", "SentID": 8308 }, { "ParagraphID": 2438, - "Paragraph": "The inclusion of young women and girls in DDR processes is central to a gender- transformative approach, aimed at shifting social norms and addressing structural inequalities that lead young women and girls to engage in armed conflict and that negatively affect their reintegration. Within DDR processes, a gender-transformative approach shall focus on the following: \\n Agency: Interventions should strengthen the individual and collective capacities (knowledge and skills), attitudes, critical reflection, assets, actions and access to services that support the reintegration of young women and girls. \\n Relations: Interventions should equip young women and girls with the skills to navigate the expectations and cooperative or negotiation dynamics embedded within relationships between people in the home, market, community, and groups and organizations that will influence choice. Interventions should also engage men and boys to challenge gender inequities including through education and dialogue on gender norms, relations, violence and inequality, which can negatively impact women, men, children, families and societies. \\n Structures: Interventions should address the informal and formal institutional rules and practices, social norms and statuses that limit options available to young women and girls and work to create space for their empowerment. This will require engaging both female and male leaders including community and religious leaders.", + "Paragraph": "The inclusion of young women and girls in DDR processes is central to a gender- transformative approach, aimed at shifting social norms and addressing structural inequalities that lead young women and girls to engage in armed conflict and that negatively affect their reintegration. Within DDR processes, a gender-transformative approach shall focus on the following: \n Agency: Interventions should strengthen the individual and collective capacities (knowledge and skills), attitudes, critical reflection, assets, actions and access to services that support the reintegration of young women and girls. \n Relations: Interventions should equip young women and girls with the skills to navigate the expectations and cooperative or negotiation dynamics embedded within relationships between people in the home, market, community, and groups and organizations that will influence choice. Interventions should also engage men and boys to challenge gender inequities including through education and dialogue on gender norms, relations, violence and inequality, which can negatively impact women, men, children, families and societies. \n Structures: Interventions should address the informal and formal institutional rules and practices, social norms and statuses that limit options available to young women and girls and work to create space for their empowerment. This will require engaging both female and male leaders including community and religious leaders.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -149581,7 +149581,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2438, - "Paragraph": "The inclusion of young women and girls in DDR processes is central to a gender- transformative approach, aimed at shifting social norms and addressing structural inequalities that lead young women and girls to engage in armed conflict and that negatively affect their reintegration. Within DDR processes, a gender-transformative approach shall focus on the following: \\n Agency: Interventions should strengthen the individual and collective capacities (knowledge and skills), attitudes, critical reflection, assets, actions and access to services that support the reintegration of young women and girls. \\n Relations: Interventions should equip young women and girls with the skills to navigate the expectations and cooperative or negotiation dynamics embedded within relationships between people in the home, market, community, and groups and organizations that will influence choice. Interventions should also engage men and boys to challenge gender inequities including through education and dialogue on gender norms, relations, violence and inequality, which can negatively impact women, men, children, families and societies. \\n Structures: Interventions should address the informal and formal institutional rules and practices, social norms and statuses that limit options available to young women and girls and work to create space for their empowerment. This will require engaging both female and male leaders including community and religious leaders.", + "Paragraph": "The inclusion of young women and girls in DDR processes is central to a gender- transformative approach, aimed at shifting social norms and addressing structural inequalities that lead young women and girls to engage in armed conflict and that negatively affect their reintegration. Within DDR processes, a gender-transformative approach shall focus on the following: \n Agency: Interventions should strengthen the individual and collective capacities (knowledge and skills), attitudes, critical reflection, assets, actions and access to services that support the reintegration of young women and girls. \n Relations: Interventions should equip young women and girls with the skills to navigate the expectations and cooperative or negotiation dynamics embedded within relationships between people in the home, market, community, and groups and organizations that will influence choice. Interventions should also engage men and boys to challenge gender inequities including through education and dialogue on gender norms, relations, violence and inequality, which can negatively impact women, men, children, families and societies. \n Structures: Interventions should address the informal and formal institutional rules and practices, social norms and statuses that limit options available to young women and girls and work to create space for their empowerment. This will require engaging both female and male leaders including community and religious leaders.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -149592,14 +149592,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Gender responsive and transformative", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Structures: Interventions should address the informal and formal institutional rules and practices, social norms and statuses that limit options available to young women and girls and work to create space for their empowerment.", + "Sentence": "\n Structures: Interventions should address the informal and formal institutional rules and practices, social norms and statuses that limit options available to young women and girls and work to create space for their empowerment.", "newParagraph": "inclusion young woman girl ddr process central gender transformative approach aimed shifting social norm addressing structural inequality lead young woman girl engage armed conflict negatively affect reintegration within ddr process gendertransformative approach shall focus following n agency intervention strengthen individual collective capacity knowledge skill attitude critical reflection asset action access service support reintegration young woman girl n relation intervention equip young woman girl skill navigate expectation cooperative negotiation dynamic embedded within relationship people home market community group organization influence choice intervention also engage men boy challenge gender inequity including education dialogue gender norm relation violence inequality negatively impact woman men child family society n structure intervention address informal formal institutional rule practice social norm status limit option available young woman girl work create space empowerment require engaging female male leader including community religious leader", "ProcessedSent": "n structure intervention address informal formal institutional rule practice social norm status limit option available young woman girl work create space empowerment", "SentID": 8310 }, { "ParagraphID": 2438, - "Paragraph": "The inclusion of young women and girls in DDR processes is central to a gender- transformative approach, aimed at shifting social norms and addressing structural inequalities that lead young women and girls to engage in armed conflict and that negatively affect their reintegration. Within DDR processes, a gender-transformative approach shall focus on the following: \\n Agency: Interventions should strengthen the individual and collective capacities (knowledge and skills), attitudes, critical reflection, assets, actions and access to services that support the reintegration of young women and girls. \\n Relations: Interventions should equip young women and girls with the skills to navigate the expectations and cooperative or negotiation dynamics embedded within relationships between people in the home, market, community, and groups and organizations that will influence choice. Interventions should also engage men and boys to challenge gender inequities including through education and dialogue on gender norms, relations, violence and inequality, which can negatively impact women, men, children, families and societies. \\n Structures: Interventions should address the informal and formal institutional rules and practices, social norms and statuses that limit options available to young women and girls and work to create space for their empowerment. This will require engaging both female and male leaders including community and religious leaders.", + "Paragraph": "The inclusion of young women and girls in DDR processes is central to a gender- transformative approach, aimed at shifting social norms and addressing structural inequalities that lead young women and girls to engage in armed conflict and that negatively affect their reintegration. Within DDR processes, a gender-transformative approach shall focus on the following: \n Agency: Interventions should strengthen the individual and collective capacities (knowledge and skills), attitudes, critical reflection, assets, actions and access to services that support the reintegration of young women and girls. \n Relations: Interventions should equip young women and girls with the skills to navigate the expectations and cooperative or negotiation dynamics embedded within relationships between people in the home, market, community, and groups and organizations that will influence choice. Interventions should also engage men and boys to challenge gender inequities including through education and dialogue on gender norms, relations, violence and inequality, which can negatively impact women, men, children, families and societies. \n Structures: Interventions should address the informal and formal institutional rules and practices, social norms and statuses that limit options available to young women and girls and work to create space for their empowerment. This will require engaging both female and male leaders including community and religious leaders.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -149671,7 +149671,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2440, - "Paragraph": "In recognition that youth are often recruited as children, and\/or face similar \u2018push\u2019 and \u2018pull\u2019 risk factors, DDR practitioners should analyse the structural, social, and individual-level risk factors outlined in section 8 of IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR when designing and implementing strategies to prevent the (re-)recruitment of youth. DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \\n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations. Volunteerism into armed groups can be driven by a desire to change the social and political landscape in positive ways and to participate in something bigger than oneself. \\n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement. Although an increasing number of young women and girls are involved in conflicts, particularly the longer conflicts continue, young men and boys are over-represented in armed forces and groups. This pattern is most often a result of societal gender expectations that value aggressive masculinity and peaceable femininity. While young women and girls often serve armed forces and groups in non- fighting roles and their contributions can be difficult to measure, their participation, reintegration and recovery is critical to peace building processes as marginalized women and girls remain at higher risk of (re)recruitment. Societal expectations may have implications for the roles of young women and men in conflict, as well as how they reintegrate following conflict (see IDDRS Module 5.10 Gender and DDR). It is important to understand the drivers for recruitment and re- recruitment, including the different challenges that male and female youth may experience.; \\n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \\n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media. Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \\n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other. Centres that allow youth to meet off the streets and experience non-violent excitement and social connection can provide alternatives to joining armed forces or groups, offer marginalized youth a space where they feel included, and provide spaces to educate youth about the realities of life in armed groups. These centres can also help with training and employment efforts by, for example, organizing job information fairs and providing referrals to employment services and counselling. Informal youth drop-in centres may also attract young former combatants who are vulnerable to re-recruitment, and who did not go through DDR because of fear or misinformation, or because they managed to escape and are looking for help by themselves. Well-trained mentors who act as role models should manage these centres; \\\u203a Interaction between different youth organizations, networks and movements as well as youth centres, platforms and councils or others similar entitiescan provide opportunities to build trust between members of different communities. DDR practitioners should support programmes that encourage young people to initiate spaces that form bridges across conflict lines at community and state levels.", + "Paragraph": "In recognition that youth are often recruited as children, and\/or face similar \u2018push\u2019 and \u2018pull\u2019 risk factors, DDR practitioners should analyse the structural, social, and individual-level risk factors outlined in section 8 of IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR when designing and implementing strategies to prevent the (re-)recruitment of youth. DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations. Volunteerism into armed groups can be driven by a desire to change the social and political landscape in positive ways and to participate in something bigger than oneself. \n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement. Although an increasing number of young women and girls are involved in conflicts, particularly the longer conflicts continue, young men and boys are over-represented in armed forces and groups. This pattern is most often a result of societal gender expectations that value aggressive masculinity and peaceable femininity. While young women and girls often serve armed forces and groups in non- fighting roles and their contributions can be difficult to measure, their participation, reintegration and recovery is critical to peace building processes as marginalized women and girls remain at higher risk of (re)recruitment. Societal expectations may have implications for the roles of young women and men in conflict, as well as how they reintegrate following conflict (see IDDRS Module 5.10 Gender and DDR). It is important to understand the drivers for recruitment and re- recruitment, including the different challenges that male and female youth may experience.; \n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media. Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other. Centres that allow youth to meet off the streets and experience non-violent excitement and social connection can provide alternatives to joining armed forces or groups, offer marginalized youth a space where they feel included, and provide spaces to educate youth about the realities of life in armed groups. These centres can also help with training and employment efforts by, for example, organizing job information fairs and providing referrals to employment services and counselling. Informal youth drop-in centres may also attract young former combatants who are vulnerable to re-recruitment, and who did not go through DDR because of fear or misinformation, or because they managed to escape and are looking for help by themselves. Well-trained mentors who act as role models should manage these centres; \\\u203a Interaction between different youth organizations, networks and movements as well as youth centres, platforms and councils or others similar entitiescan provide opportunities to build trust between members of different communities. DDR practitioners should support programmes that encourage young people to initiate spaces that form bridges across conflict lines at community and state levels.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -149689,7 +149689,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2440, - "Paragraph": "In recognition that youth are often recruited as children, and\/or face similar \u2018push\u2019 and \u2018pull\u2019 risk factors, DDR practitioners should analyse the structural, social, and individual-level risk factors outlined in section 8 of IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR when designing and implementing strategies to prevent the (re-)recruitment of youth. DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \\n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations. Volunteerism into armed groups can be driven by a desire to change the social and political landscape in positive ways and to participate in something bigger than oneself. \\n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement. Although an increasing number of young women and girls are involved in conflicts, particularly the longer conflicts continue, young men and boys are over-represented in armed forces and groups. This pattern is most often a result of societal gender expectations that value aggressive masculinity and peaceable femininity. While young women and girls often serve armed forces and groups in non- fighting roles and their contributions can be difficult to measure, their participation, reintegration and recovery is critical to peace building processes as marginalized women and girls remain at higher risk of (re)recruitment. Societal expectations may have implications for the roles of young women and men in conflict, as well as how they reintegrate following conflict (see IDDRS Module 5.10 Gender and DDR). It is important to understand the drivers for recruitment and re- recruitment, including the different challenges that male and female youth may experience.; \\n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \\n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media. Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \\n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other. Centres that allow youth to meet off the streets and experience non-violent excitement and social connection can provide alternatives to joining armed forces or groups, offer marginalized youth a space where they feel included, and provide spaces to educate youth about the realities of life in armed groups. These centres can also help with training and employment efforts by, for example, organizing job information fairs and providing referrals to employment services and counselling. Informal youth drop-in centres may also attract young former combatants who are vulnerable to re-recruitment, and who did not go through DDR because of fear or misinformation, or because they managed to escape and are looking for help by themselves. Well-trained mentors who act as role models should manage these centres; \\\u203a Interaction between different youth organizations, networks and movements as well as youth centres, platforms and councils or others similar entitiescan provide opportunities to build trust between members of different communities. DDR practitioners should support programmes that encourage young people to initiate spaces that form bridges across conflict lines at community and state levels.", + "Paragraph": "In recognition that youth are often recruited as children, and\/or face similar \u2018push\u2019 and \u2018pull\u2019 risk factors, DDR practitioners should analyse the structural, social, and individual-level risk factors outlined in section 8 of IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR when designing and implementing strategies to prevent the (re-)recruitment of youth. DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations. Volunteerism into armed groups can be driven by a desire to change the social and political landscape in positive ways and to participate in something bigger than oneself. \n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement. Although an increasing number of young women and girls are involved in conflicts, particularly the longer conflicts continue, young men and boys are over-represented in armed forces and groups. This pattern is most often a result of societal gender expectations that value aggressive masculinity and peaceable femininity. While young women and girls often serve armed forces and groups in non- fighting roles and their contributions can be difficult to measure, their participation, reintegration and recovery is critical to peace building processes as marginalized women and girls remain at higher risk of (re)recruitment. Societal expectations may have implications for the roles of young women and men in conflict, as well as how they reintegrate following conflict (see IDDRS Module 5.10 Gender and DDR). It is important to understand the drivers for recruitment and re- recruitment, including the different challenges that male and female youth may experience.; \n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media. Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other. Centres that allow youth to meet off the streets and experience non-violent excitement and social connection can provide alternatives to joining armed forces or groups, offer marginalized youth a space where they feel included, and provide spaces to educate youth about the realities of life in armed groups. These centres can also help with training and employment efforts by, for example, organizing job information fairs and providing referrals to employment services and counselling. Informal youth drop-in centres may also attract young former combatants who are vulnerable to re-recruitment, and who did not go through DDR because of fear or misinformation, or because they managed to escape and are looking for help by themselves. Well-trained mentors who act as role models should manage these centres; \\\u203a Interaction between different youth organizations, networks and movements as well as youth centres, platforms and councils or others similar entitiescan provide opportunities to build trust between members of different communities. DDR practitioners should support programmes that encourage young people to initiate spaces that form bridges across conflict lines at community and state levels.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -149700,14 +149700,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \\n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations.", + "Sentence": "DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations.", "newParagraph": "recognition youth often recruited child andor face similar push pull risk factor ddr practitioner analyse structural social individuallevel risk factor outlined section 8 iddrs 520 child ddr designing implementing strategy prevent rerecruitment youth ddr practitioner also aware n youth participation armed conflict always driven negative motivation volunteerism armed group driven desire change social political landscape positive way participate something bigger oneself n gender must considered considering reason youth engagement although increasing number young woman girl involved conflict particularly longer conflict continue young men boy overrepresented armed force group pattern often result societal gender expectation value aggressive masculinity peaceable femininity young woman girl often serve armed force group non fighting role contribution difficult measure participation reintegration recovery critical peace building process marginalized woman girl remain higher risk rerecruitment societal expectation may implication role young woman men conflict well reintegrate following conflict see iddrs module 510 gender ddr important understand driver recruitment recruitment including different challenge male female youth may experience n cvr communitybased reintegration programme useful preventing recruitment youth see section 74 iddrs 230 community violence reduction iddrs 430 reintegration n young people play crucial role preventing spread rumour may fuel recruitment armed conflict particularly social medium different youth network organization may use connection factcheck rumour spread corrected information community n safe space may take form youth centre contextually appropriate gender sensitive form recommended created place young people interact centre allow youth meet street experience nonviolent excitement social connection provide alternative joining armed force group offer marginalized youth space feel included provide space educate youth reality life armed group centre also help training employment effort example organizing job information fair providing referral employment service counselling informal youth dropin centre may also attract young former combatant vulnerable rerecruitment go ddr fear misinformation managed escape looking help welltrained mentor act role model manage centre interaction different youth organization network movement well youth centre platform council others similar entitiescan provide opportunity build trust member different community ddr practitioner support programme encourage young people initiate space form bridge across conflict line community state level", "ProcessedSent": "ddr practitioner also aware n youth participation armed conflict always driven negative motivation", "SentID": 8316 }, { "ParagraphID": 2440, - "Paragraph": "In recognition that youth are often recruited as children, and\/or face similar \u2018push\u2019 and \u2018pull\u2019 risk factors, DDR practitioners should analyse the structural, social, and individual-level risk factors outlined in section 8 of IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR when designing and implementing strategies to prevent the (re-)recruitment of youth. DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \\n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations. Volunteerism into armed groups can be driven by a desire to change the social and political landscape in positive ways and to participate in something bigger than oneself. \\n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement. Although an increasing number of young women and girls are involved in conflicts, particularly the longer conflicts continue, young men and boys are over-represented in armed forces and groups. This pattern is most often a result of societal gender expectations that value aggressive masculinity and peaceable femininity. While young women and girls often serve armed forces and groups in non- fighting roles and their contributions can be difficult to measure, their participation, reintegration and recovery is critical to peace building processes as marginalized women and girls remain at higher risk of (re)recruitment. Societal expectations may have implications for the roles of young women and men in conflict, as well as how they reintegrate following conflict (see IDDRS Module 5.10 Gender and DDR). It is important to understand the drivers for recruitment and re- recruitment, including the different challenges that male and female youth may experience.; \\n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \\n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media. Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \\n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other. Centres that allow youth to meet off the streets and experience non-violent excitement and social connection can provide alternatives to joining armed forces or groups, offer marginalized youth a space where they feel included, and provide spaces to educate youth about the realities of life in armed groups. These centres can also help with training and employment efforts by, for example, organizing job information fairs and providing referrals to employment services and counselling. Informal youth drop-in centres may also attract young former combatants who are vulnerable to re-recruitment, and who did not go through DDR because of fear or misinformation, or because they managed to escape and are looking for help by themselves. Well-trained mentors who act as role models should manage these centres; \\\u203a Interaction between different youth organizations, networks and movements as well as youth centres, platforms and councils or others similar entitiescan provide opportunities to build trust between members of different communities. DDR practitioners should support programmes that encourage young people to initiate spaces that form bridges across conflict lines at community and state levels.", + "Paragraph": "In recognition that youth are often recruited as children, and\/or face similar \u2018push\u2019 and \u2018pull\u2019 risk factors, DDR practitioners should analyse the structural, social, and individual-level risk factors outlined in section 8 of IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR when designing and implementing strategies to prevent the (re-)recruitment of youth. DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations. Volunteerism into armed groups can be driven by a desire to change the social and political landscape in positive ways and to participate in something bigger than oneself. \n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement. Although an increasing number of young women and girls are involved in conflicts, particularly the longer conflicts continue, young men and boys are over-represented in armed forces and groups. This pattern is most often a result of societal gender expectations that value aggressive masculinity and peaceable femininity. While young women and girls often serve armed forces and groups in non- fighting roles and their contributions can be difficult to measure, their participation, reintegration and recovery is critical to peace building processes as marginalized women and girls remain at higher risk of (re)recruitment. Societal expectations may have implications for the roles of young women and men in conflict, as well as how they reintegrate following conflict (see IDDRS Module 5.10 Gender and DDR). It is important to understand the drivers for recruitment and re- recruitment, including the different challenges that male and female youth may experience.; \n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media. Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other. Centres that allow youth to meet off the streets and experience non-violent excitement and social connection can provide alternatives to joining armed forces or groups, offer marginalized youth a space where they feel included, and provide spaces to educate youth about the realities of life in armed groups. These centres can also help with training and employment efforts by, for example, organizing job information fairs and providing referrals to employment services and counselling. Informal youth drop-in centres may also attract young former combatants who are vulnerable to re-recruitment, and who did not go through DDR because of fear or misinformation, or because they managed to escape and are looking for help by themselves. Well-trained mentors who act as role models should manage these centres; \\\u203a Interaction between different youth organizations, networks and movements as well as youth centres, platforms and councils or others similar entitiescan provide opportunities to build trust between members of different communities. DDR practitioners should support programmes that encourage young people to initiate spaces that form bridges across conflict lines at community and state levels.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -149725,7 +149725,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2440, - "Paragraph": "In recognition that youth are often recruited as children, and\/or face similar \u2018push\u2019 and \u2018pull\u2019 risk factors, DDR practitioners should analyse the structural, social, and individual-level risk factors outlined in section 8 of IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR when designing and implementing strategies to prevent the (re-)recruitment of youth. DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \\n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations. Volunteerism into armed groups can be driven by a desire to change the social and political landscape in positive ways and to participate in something bigger than oneself. \\n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement. Although an increasing number of young women and girls are involved in conflicts, particularly the longer conflicts continue, young men and boys are over-represented in armed forces and groups. This pattern is most often a result of societal gender expectations that value aggressive masculinity and peaceable femininity. While young women and girls often serve armed forces and groups in non- fighting roles and their contributions can be difficult to measure, their participation, reintegration and recovery is critical to peace building processes as marginalized women and girls remain at higher risk of (re)recruitment. Societal expectations may have implications for the roles of young women and men in conflict, as well as how they reintegrate following conflict (see IDDRS Module 5.10 Gender and DDR). It is important to understand the drivers for recruitment and re- recruitment, including the different challenges that male and female youth may experience.; \\n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \\n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media. Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \\n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other. Centres that allow youth to meet off the streets and experience non-violent excitement and social connection can provide alternatives to joining armed forces or groups, offer marginalized youth a space where they feel included, and provide spaces to educate youth about the realities of life in armed groups. These centres can also help with training and employment efforts by, for example, organizing job information fairs and providing referrals to employment services and counselling. Informal youth drop-in centres may also attract young former combatants who are vulnerable to re-recruitment, and who did not go through DDR because of fear or misinformation, or because they managed to escape and are looking for help by themselves. Well-trained mentors who act as role models should manage these centres; \\\u203a Interaction between different youth organizations, networks and movements as well as youth centres, platforms and councils or others similar entitiescan provide opportunities to build trust between members of different communities. DDR practitioners should support programmes that encourage young people to initiate spaces that form bridges across conflict lines at community and state levels.", + "Paragraph": "In recognition that youth are often recruited as children, and\/or face similar \u2018push\u2019 and \u2018pull\u2019 risk factors, DDR practitioners should analyse the structural, social, and individual-level risk factors outlined in section 8 of IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR when designing and implementing strategies to prevent the (re-)recruitment of youth. DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations. Volunteerism into armed groups can be driven by a desire to change the social and political landscape in positive ways and to participate in something bigger than oneself. \n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement. Although an increasing number of young women and girls are involved in conflicts, particularly the longer conflicts continue, young men and boys are over-represented in armed forces and groups. This pattern is most often a result of societal gender expectations that value aggressive masculinity and peaceable femininity. While young women and girls often serve armed forces and groups in non- fighting roles and their contributions can be difficult to measure, their participation, reintegration and recovery is critical to peace building processes as marginalized women and girls remain at higher risk of (re)recruitment. Societal expectations may have implications for the roles of young women and men in conflict, as well as how they reintegrate following conflict (see IDDRS Module 5.10 Gender and DDR). It is important to understand the drivers for recruitment and re- recruitment, including the different challenges that male and female youth may experience.; \n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media. Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other. Centres that allow youth to meet off the streets and experience non-violent excitement and social connection can provide alternatives to joining armed forces or groups, offer marginalized youth a space where they feel included, and provide spaces to educate youth about the realities of life in armed groups. These centres can also help with training and employment efforts by, for example, organizing job information fairs and providing referrals to employment services and counselling. Informal youth drop-in centres may also attract young former combatants who are vulnerable to re-recruitment, and who did not go through DDR because of fear or misinformation, or because they managed to escape and are looking for help by themselves. Well-trained mentors who act as role models should manage these centres; \\\u203a Interaction between different youth organizations, networks and movements as well as youth centres, platforms and councils or others similar entitiescan provide opportunities to build trust between members of different communities. DDR practitioners should support programmes that encourage young people to initiate spaces that form bridges across conflict lines at community and state levels.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -149736,14 +149736,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement.", + "Sentence": "\n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement.", "newParagraph": "recognition youth often recruited child andor face similar push pull risk factor ddr practitioner analyse structural social individuallevel risk factor outlined section 8 iddrs 520 child ddr designing implementing strategy prevent rerecruitment youth ddr practitioner also aware n youth participation armed conflict always driven negative motivation volunteerism armed group driven desire change social political landscape positive way participate something bigger oneself n gender must considered considering reason youth engagement although increasing number young woman girl involved conflict particularly longer conflict continue young men boy overrepresented armed force group pattern often result societal gender expectation value aggressive masculinity peaceable femininity young woman girl often serve armed force group non fighting role contribution difficult measure participation reintegration recovery critical peace building process marginalized woman girl remain higher risk rerecruitment societal expectation may implication role young woman men conflict well reintegrate following conflict see iddrs module 510 gender ddr important understand driver recruitment recruitment including different challenge male female youth may experience n cvr communitybased reintegration programme useful preventing recruitment youth see section 74 iddrs 230 community violence reduction iddrs 430 reintegration n young people play crucial role preventing spread rumour may fuel recruitment armed conflict particularly social medium different youth network organization may use connection factcheck rumour spread corrected information community n safe space may take form youth centre contextually appropriate gender sensitive form recommended created place young people interact centre allow youth meet street experience nonviolent excitement social connection provide alternative joining armed force group offer marginalized youth space feel included provide space educate youth reality life armed group centre also help training employment effort example organizing job information fair providing referral employment service counselling informal youth dropin centre may also attract young former combatant vulnerable rerecruitment go ddr fear misinformation managed escape looking help welltrained mentor act role model manage centre interaction different youth organization network movement well youth centre platform council others similar entitiescan provide opportunity build trust member different community ddr practitioner support programme encourage young people initiate space form bridge across conflict line community state level", "ProcessedSent": "n gender must considered considering reason youth engagement", "SentID": 8318 }, { "ParagraphID": 2440, - "Paragraph": "In recognition that youth are often recruited as children, and\/or face similar \u2018push\u2019 and \u2018pull\u2019 risk factors, DDR practitioners should analyse the structural, social, and individual-level risk factors outlined in section 8 of IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR when designing and implementing strategies to prevent the (re-)recruitment of youth. DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \\n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations. Volunteerism into armed groups can be driven by a desire to change the social and political landscape in positive ways and to participate in something bigger than oneself. \\n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement. Although an increasing number of young women and girls are involved in conflicts, particularly the longer conflicts continue, young men and boys are over-represented in armed forces and groups. This pattern is most often a result of societal gender expectations that value aggressive masculinity and peaceable femininity. While young women and girls often serve armed forces and groups in non- fighting roles and their contributions can be difficult to measure, their participation, reintegration and recovery is critical to peace building processes as marginalized women and girls remain at higher risk of (re)recruitment. Societal expectations may have implications for the roles of young women and men in conflict, as well as how they reintegrate following conflict (see IDDRS Module 5.10 Gender and DDR). It is important to understand the drivers for recruitment and re- recruitment, including the different challenges that male and female youth may experience.; \\n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \\n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media. Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \\n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other. Centres that allow youth to meet off the streets and experience non-violent excitement and social connection can provide alternatives to joining armed forces or groups, offer marginalized youth a space where they feel included, and provide spaces to educate youth about the realities of life in armed groups. These centres can also help with training and employment efforts by, for example, organizing job information fairs and providing referrals to employment services and counselling. Informal youth drop-in centres may also attract young former combatants who are vulnerable to re-recruitment, and who did not go through DDR because of fear or misinformation, or because they managed to escape and are looking for help by themselves. Well-trained mentors who act as role models should manage these centres; \\\u203a Interaction between different youth organizations, networks and movements as well as youth centres, platforms and councils or others similar entitiescan provide opportunities to build trust between members of different communities. DDR practitioners should support programmes that encourage young people to initiate spaces that form bridges across conflict lines at community and state levels.", + "Paragraph": "In recognition that youth are often recruited as children, and\/or face similar \u2018push\u2019 and \u2018pull\u2019 risk factors, DDR practitioners should analyse the structural, social, and individual-level risk factors outlined in section 8 of IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR when designing and implementing strategies to prevent the (re-)recruitment of youth. DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations. Volunteerism into armed groups can be driven by a desire to change the social and political landscape in positive ways and to participate in something bigger than oneself. \n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement. Although an increasing number of young women and girls are involved in conflicts, particularly the longer conflicts continue, young men and boys are over-represented in armed forces and groups. This pattern is most often a result of societal gender expectations that value aggressive masculinity and peaceable femininity. While young women and girls often serve armed forces and groups in non- fighting roles and their contributions can be difficult to measure, their participation, reintegration and recovery is critical to peace building processes as marginalized women and girls remain at higher risk of (re)recruitment. Societal expectations may have implications for the roles of young women and men in conflict, as well as how they reintegrate following conflict (see IDDRS Module 5.10 Gender and DDR). It is important to understand the drivers for recruitment and re- recruitment, including the different challenges that male and female youth may experience.; \n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media. Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other. Centres that allow youth to meet off the streets and experience non-violent excitement and social connection can provide alternatives to joining armed forces or groups, offer marginalized youth a space where they feel included, and provide spaces to educate youth about the realities of life in armed groups. These centres can also help with training and employment efforts by, for example, organizing job information fairs and providing referrals to employment services and counselling. Informal youth drop-in centres may also attract young former combatants who are vulnerable to re-recruitment, and who did not go through DDR because of fear or misinformation, or because they managed to escape and are looking for help by themselves. Well-trained mentors who act as role models should manage these centres; \\\u203a Interaction between different youth organizations, networks and movements as well as youth centres, platforms and councils or others similar entitiescan provide opportunities to build trust between members of different communities. DDR practitioners should support programmes that encourage young people to initiate spaces that form bridges across conflict lines at community and state levels.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -149761,7 +149761,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2440, - "Paragraph": "In recognition that youth are often recruited as children, and\/or face similar \u2018push\u2019 and \u2018pull\u2019 risk factors, DDR practitioners should analyse the structural, social, and individual-level risk factors outlined in section 8 of IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR when designing and implementing strategies to prevent the (re-)recruitment of youth. DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \\n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations. Volunteerism into armed groups can be driven by a desire to change the social and political landscape in positive ways and to participate in something bigger than oneself. \\n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement. Although an increasing number of young women and girls are involved in conflicts, particularly the longer conflicts continue, young men and boys are over-represented in armed forces and groups. This pattern is most often a result of societal gender expectations that value aggressive masculinity and peaceable femininity. While young women and girls often serve armed forces and groups in non- fighting roles and their contributions can be difficult to measure, their participation, reintegration and recovery is critical to peace building processes as marginalized women and girls remain at higher risk of (re)recruitment. Societal expectations may have implications for the roles of young women and men in conflict, as well as how they reintegrate following conflict (see IDDRS Module 5.10 Gender and DDR). It is important to understand the drivers for recruitment and re- recruitment, including the different challenges that male and female youth may experience.; \\n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \\n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media. Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \\n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other. Centres that allow youth to meet off the streets and experience non-violent excitement and social connection can provide alternatives to joining armed forces or groups, offer marginalized youth a space where they feel included, and provide spaces to educate youth about the realities of life in armed groups. These centres can also help with training and employment efforts by, for example, organizing job information fairs and providing referrals to employment services and counselling. Informal youth drop-in centres may also attract young former combatants who are vulnerable to re-recruitment, and who did not go through DDR because of fear or misinformation, or because they managed to escape and are looking for help by themselves. Well-trained mentors who act as role models should manage these centres; \\\u203a Interaction between different youth organizations, networks and movements as well as youth centres, platforms and councils or others similar entitiescan provide opportunities to build trust between members of different communities. DDR practitioners should support programmes that encourage young people to initiate spaces that form bridges across conflict lines at community and state levels.", + "Paragraph": "In recognition that youth are often recruited as children, and\/or face similar \u2018push\u2019 and \u2018pull\u2019 risk factors, DDR practitioners should analyse the structural, social, and individual-level risk factors outlined in section 8 of IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR when designing and implementing strategies to prevent the (re-)recruitment of youth. DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations. Volunteerism into armed groups can be driven by a desire to change the social and political landscape in positive ways and to participate in something bigger than oneself. \n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement. Although an increasing number of young women and girls are involved in conflicts, particularly the longer conflicts continue, young men and boys are over-represented in armed forces and groups. This pattern is most often a result of societal gender expectations that value aggressive masculinity and peaceable femininity. While young women and girls often serve armed forces and groups in non- fighting roles and their contributions can be difficult to measure, their participation, reintegration and recovery is critical to peace building processes as marginalized women and girls remain at higher risk of (re)recruitment. Societal expectations may have implications for the roles of young women and men in conflict, as well as how they reintegrate following conflict (see IDDRS Module 5.10 Gender and DDR). It is important to understand the drivers for recruitment and re- recruitment, including the different challenges that male and female youth may experience.; \n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media. Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other. Centres that allow youth to meet off the streets and experience non-violent excitement and social connection can provide alternatives to joining armed forces or groups, offer marginalized youth a space where they feel included, and provide spaces to educate youth about the realities of life in armed groups. These centres can also help with training and employment efforts by, for example, organizing job information fairs and providing referrals to employment services and counselling. Informal youth drop-in centres may also attract young former combatants who are vulnerable to re-recruitment, and who did not go through DDR because of fear or misinformation, or because they managed to escape and are looking for help by themselves. Well-trained mentors who act as role models should manage these centres; \\\u203a Interaction between different youth organizations, networks and movements as well as youth centres, platforms and councils or others similar entitiescan provide opportunities to build trust between members of different communities. DDR practitioners should support programmes that encourage young people to initiate spaces that form bridges across conflict lines at community and state levels.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -149779,7 +149779,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2440, - "Paragraph": "In recognition that youth are often recruited as children, and\/or face similar \u2018push\u2019 and \u2018pull\u2019 risk factors, DDR practitioners should analyse the structural, social, and individual-level risk factors outlined in section 8 of IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR when designing and implementing strategies to prevent the (re-)recruitment of youth. DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \\n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations. Volunteerism into armed groups can be driven by a desire to change the social and political landscape in positive ways and to participate in something bigger than oneself. \\n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement. Although an increasing number of young women and girls are involved in conflicts, particularly the longer conflicts continue, young men and boys are over-represented in armed forces and groups. This pattern is most often a result of societal gender expectations that value aggressive masculinity and peaceable femininity. While young women and girls often serve armed forces and groups in non- fighting roles and their contributions can be difficult to measure, their participation, reintegration and recovery is critical to peace building processes as marginalized women and girls remain at higher risk of (re)recruitment. Societal expectations may have implications for the roles of young women and men in conflict, as well as how they reintegrate following conflict (see IDDRS Module 5.10 Gender and DDR). It is important to understand the drivers for recruitment and re- recruitment, including the different challenges that male and female youth may experience.; \\n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \\n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media. Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \\n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other. Centres that allow youth to meet off the streets and experience non-violent excitement and social connection can provide alternatives to joining armed forces or groups, offer marginalized youth a space where they feel included, and provide spaces to educate youth about the realities of life in armed groups. These centres can also help with training and employment efforts by, for example, organizing job information fairs and providing referrals to employment services and counselling. Informal youth drop-in centres may also attract young former combatants who are vulnerable to re-recruitment, and who did not go through DDR because of fear or misinformation, or because they managed to escape and are looking for help by themselves. Well-trained mentors who act as role models should manage these centres; \\\u203a Interaction between different youth organizations, networks and movements as well as youth centres, platforms and councils or others similar entitiescan provide opportunities to build trust between members of different communities. DDR practitioners should support programmes that encourage young people to initiate spaces that form bridges across conflict lines at community and state levels.", + "Paragraph": "In recognition that youth are often recruited as children, and\/or face similar \u2018push\u2019 and \u2018pull\u2019 risk factors, DDR practitioners should analyse the structural, social, and individual-level risk factors outlined in section 8 of IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR when designing and implementing strategies to prevent the (re-)recruitment of youth. DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations. Volunteerism into armed groups can be driven by a desire to change the social and political landscape in positive ways and to participate in something bigger than oneself. \n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement. Although an increasing number of young women and girls are involved in conflicts, particularly the longer conflicts continue, young men and boys are over-represented in armed forces and groups. This pattern is most often a result of societal gender expectations that value aggressive masculinity and peaceable femininity. While young women and girls often serve armed forces and groups in non- fighting roles and their contributions can be difficult to measure, their participation, reintegration and recovery is critical to peace building processes as marginalized women and girls remain at higher risk of (re)recruitment. Societal expectations may have implications for the roles of young women and men in conflict, as well as how they reintegrate following conflict (see IDDRS Module 5.10 Gender and DDR). It is important to understand the drivers for recruitment and re- recruitment, including the different challenges that male and female youth may experience.; \n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media. Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other. Centres that allow youth to meet off the streets and experience non-violent excitement and social connection can provide alternatives to joining armed forces or groups, offer marginalized youth a space where they feel included, and provide spaces to educate youth about the realities of life in armed groups. These centres can also help with training and employment efforts by, for example, organizing job information fairs and providing referrals to employment services and counselling. Informal youth drop-in centres may also attract young former combatants who are vulnerable to re-recruitment, and who did not go through DDR because of fear or misinformation, or because they managed to escape and are looking for help by themselves. Well-trained mentors who act as role models should manage these centres; \\\u203a Interaction between different youth organizations, networks and movements as well as youth centres, platforms and councils or others similar entitiescan provide opportunities to build trust between members of different communities. DDR practitioners should support programmes that encourage young people to initiate spaces that form bridges across conflict lines at community and state levels.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -149797,7 +149797,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2440, - "Paragraph": "In recognition that youth are often recruited as children, and\/or face similar \u2018push\u2019 and \u2018pull\u2019 risk factors, DDR practitioners should analyse the structural, social, and individual-level risk factors outlined in section 8 of IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR when designing and implementing strategies to prevent the (re-)recruitment of youth. DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \\n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations. Volunteerism into armed groups can be driven by a desire to change the social and political landscape in positive ways and to participate in something bigger than oneself. \\n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement. Although an increasing number of young women and girls are involved in conflicts, particularly the longer conflicts continue, young men and boys are over-represented in armed forces and groups. This pattern is most often a result of societal gender expectations that value aggressive masculinity and peaceable femininity. While young women and girls often serve armed forces and groups in non- fighting roles and their contributions can be difficult to measure, their participation, reintegration and recovery is critical to peace building processes as marginalized women and girls remain at higher risk of (re)recruitment. Societal expectations may have implications for the roles of young women and men in conflict, as well as how they reintegrate following conflict (see IDDRS Module 5.10 Gender and DDR). It is important to understand the drivers for recruitment and re- recruitment, including the different challenges that male and female youth may experience.; \\n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \\n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media. Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \\n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other. Centres that allow youth to meet off the streets and experience non-violent excitement and social connection can provide alternatives to joining armed forces or groups, offer marginalized youth a space where they feel included, and provide spaces to educate youth about the realities of life in armed groups. These centres can also help with training and employment efforts by, for example, organizing job information fairs and providing referrals to employment services and counselling. Informal youth drop-in centres may also attract young former combatants who are vulnerable to re-recruitment, and who did not go through DDR because of fear or misinformation, or because they managed to escape and are looking for help by themselves. Well-trained mentors who act as role models should manage these centres; \\\u203a Interaction between different youth organizations, networks and movements as well as youth centres, platforms and councils or others similar entitiescan provide opportunities to build trust between members of different communities. DDR practitioners should support programmes that encourage young people to initiate spaces that form bridges across conflict lines at community and state levels.", + "Paragraph": "In recognition that youth are often recruited as children, and\/or face similar \u2018push\u2019 and \u2018pull\u2019 risk factors, DDR practitioners should analyse the structural, social, and individual-level risk factors outlined in section 8 of IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR when designing and implementing strategies to prevent the (re-)recruitment of youth. DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations. Volunteerism into armed groups can be driven by a desire to change the social and political landscape in positive ways and to participate in something bigger than oneself. \n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement. Although an increasing number of young women and girls are involved in conflicts, particularly the longer conflicts continue, young men and boys are over-represented in armed forces and groups. This pattern is most often a result of societal gender expectations that value aggressive masculinity and peaceable femininity. While young women and girls often serve armed forces and groups in non- fighting roles and their contributions can be difficult to measure, their participation, reintegration and recovery is critical to peace building processes as marginalized women and girls remain at higher risk of (re)recruitment. Societal expectations may have implications for the roles of young women and men in conflict, as well as how they reintegrate following conflict (see IDDRS Module 5.10 Gender and DDR). It is important to understand the drivers for recruitment and re- recruitment, including the different challenges that male and female youth may experience.; \n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media. Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other. Centres that allow youth to meet off the streets and experience non-violent excitement and social connection can provide alternatives to joining armed forces or groups, offer marginalized youth a space where they feel included, and provide spaces to educate youth about the realities of life in armed groups. These centres can also help with training and employment efforts by, for example, organizing job information fairs and providing referrals to employment services and counselling. Informal youth drop-in centres may also attract young former combatants who are vulnerable to re-recruitment, and who did not go through DDR because of fear or misinformation, or because they managed to escape and are looking for help by themselves. Well-trained mentors who act as role models should manage these centres; \\\u203a Interaction between different youth organizations, networks and movements as well as youth centres, platforms and councils or others similar entitiescan provide opportunities to build trust between members of different communities. DDR practitioners should support programmes that encourage young people to initiate spaces that form bridges across conflict lines at community and state levels.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -149815,7 +149815,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2440, - "Paragraph": "In recognition that youth are often recruited as children, and\/or face similar \u2018push\u2019 and \u2018pull\u2019 risk factors, DDR practitioners should analyse the structural, social, and individual-level risk factors outlined in section 8 of IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR when designing and implementing strategies to prevent the (re-)recruitment of youth. DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \\n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations. Volunteerism into armed groups can be driven by a desire to change the social and political landscape in positive ways and to participate in something bigger than oneself. \\n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement. Although an increasing number of young women and girls are involved in conflicts, particularly the longer conflicts continue, young men and boys are over-represented in armed forces and groups. This pattern is most often a result of societal gender expectations that value aggressive masculinity and peaceable femininity. While young women and girls often serve armed forces and groups in non- fighting roles and their contributions can be difficult to measure, their participation, reintegration and recovery is critical to peace building processes as marginalized women and girls remain at higher risk of (re)recruitment. Societal expectations may have implications for the roles of young women and men in conflict, as well as how they reintegrate following conflict (see IDDRS Module 5.10 Gender and DDR). It is important to understand the drivers for recruitment and re- recruitment, including the different challenges that male and female youth may experience.; \\n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \\n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media. Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \\n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other. Centres that allow youth to meet off the streets and experience non-violent excitement and social connection can provide alternatives to joining armed forces or groups, offer marginalized youth a space where they feel included, and provide spaces to educate youth about the realities of life in armed groups. These centres can also help with training and employment efforts by, for example, organizing job information fairs and providing referrals to employment services and counselling. Informal youth drop-in centres may also attract young former combatants who are vulnerable to re-recruitment, and who did not go through DDR because of fear or misinformation, or because they managed to escape and are looking for help by themselves. Well-trained mentors who act as role models should manage these centres; \\\u203a Interaction between different youth organizations, networks and movements as well as youth centres, platforms and councils or others similar entitiescan provide opportunities to build trust between members of different communities. DDR practitioners should support programmes that encourage young people to initiate spaces that form bridges across conflict lines at community and state levels.", + "Paragraph": "In recognition that youth are often recruited as children, and\/or face similar \u2018push\u2019 and \u2018pull\u2019 risk factors, DDR practitioners should analyse the structural, social, and individual-level risk factors outlined in section 8 of IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR when designing and implementing strategies to prevent the (re-)recruitment of youth. DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations. Volunteerism into armed groups can be driven by a desire to change the social and political landscape in positive ways and to participate in something bigger than oneself. \n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement. Although an increasing number of young women and girls are involved in conflicts, particularly the longer conflicts continue, young men and boys are over-represented in armed forces and groups. This pattern is most often a result of societal gender expectations that value aggressive masculinity and peaceable femininity. While young women and girls often serve armed forces and groups in non- fighting roles and their contributions can be difficult to measure, their participation, reintegration and recovery is critical to peace building processes as marginalized women and girls remain at higher risk of (re)recruitment. Societal expectations may have implications for the roles of young women and men in conflict, as well as how they reintegrate following conflict (see IDDRS Module 5.10 Gender and DDR). It is important to understand the drivers for recruitment and re- recruitment, including the different challenges that male and female youth may experience.; \n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media. Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other. Centres that allow youth to meet off the streets and experience non-violent excitement and social connection can provide alternatives to joining armed forces or groups, offer marginalized youth a space where they feel included, and provide spaces to educate youth about the realities of life in armed groups. These centres can also help with training and employment efforts by, for example, organizing job information fairs and providing referrals to employment services and counselling. Informal youth drop-in centres may also attract young former combatants who are vulnerable to re-recruitment, and who did not go through DDR because of fear or misinformation, or because they managed to escape and are looking for help by themselves. Well-trained mentors who act as role models should manage these centres; \\\u203a Interaction between different youth organizations, networks and movements as well as youth centres, platforms and councils or others similar entitiescan provide opportunities to build trust between members of different communities. DDR practitioners should support programmes that encourage young people to initiate spaces that form bridges across conflict lines at community and state levels.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -149833,7 +149833,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2440, - "Paragraph": "In recognition that youth are often recruited as children, and\/or face similar \u2018push\u2019 and \u2018pull\u2019 risk factors, DDR practitioners should analyse the structural, social, and individual-level risk factors outlined in section 8 of IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR when designing and implementing strategies to prevent the (re-)recruitment of youth. DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \\n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations. Volunteerism into armed groups can be driven by a desire to change the social and political landscape in positive ways and to participate in something bigger than oneself. \\n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement. Although an increasing number of young women and girls are involved in conflicts, particularly the longer conflicts continue, young men and boys are over-represented in armed forces and groups. This pattern is most often a result of societal gender expectations that value aggressive masculinity and peaceable femininity. While young women and girls often serve armed forces and groups in non- fighting roles and their contributions can be difficult to measure, their participation, reintegration and recovery is critical to peace building processes as marginalized women and girls remain at higher risk of (re)recruitment. Societal expectations may have implications for the roles of young women and men in conflict, as well as how they reintegrate following conflict (see IDDRS Module 5.10 Gender and DDR). It is important to understand the drivers for recruitment and re- recruitment, including the different challenges that male and female youth may experience.; \\n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \\n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media. Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \\n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other. Centres that allow youth to meet off the streets and experience non-violent excitement and social connection can provide alternatives to joining armed forces or groups, offer marginalized youth a space where they feel included, and provide spaces to educate youth about the realities of life in armed groups. These centres can also help with training and employment efforts by, for example, organizing job information fairs and providing referrals to employment services and counselling. Informal youth drop-in centres may also attract young former combatants who are vulnerable to re-recruitment, and who did not go through DDR because of fear or misinformation, or because they managed to escape and are looking for help by themselves. Well-trained mentors who act as role models should manage these centres; \\\u203a Interaction between different youth organizations, networks and movements as well as youth centres, platforms and councils or others similar entitiescan provide opportunities to build trust between members of different communities. DDR practitioners should support programmes that encourage young people to initiate spaces that form bridges across conflict lines at community and state levels.", + "Paragraph": "In recognition that youth are often recruited as children, and\/or face similar \u2018push\u2019 and \u2018pull\u2019 risk factors, DDR practitioners should analyse the structural, social, and individual-level risk factors outlined in section 8 of IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR when designing and implementing strategies to prevent the (re-)recruitment of youth. DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations. Volunteerism into armed groups can be driven by a desire to change the social and political landscape in positive ways and to participate in something bigger than oneself. \n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement. Although an increasing number of young women and girls are involved in conflicts, particularly the longer conflicts continue, young men and boys are over-represented in armed forces and groups. This pattern is most often a result of societal gender expectations that value aggressive masculinity and peaceable femininity. While young women and girls often serve armed forces and groups in non- fighting roles and their contributions can be difficult to measure, their participation, reintegration and recovery is critical to peace building processes as marginalized women and girls remain at higher risk of (re)recruitment. Societal expectations may have implications for the roles of young women and men in conflict, as well as how they reintegrate following conflict (see IDDRS Module 5.10 Gender and DDR). It is important to understand the drivers for recruitment and re- recruitment, including the different challenges that male and female youth may experience.; \n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media. Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other. Centres that allow youth to meet off the streets and experience non-violent excitement and social connection can provide alternatives to joining armed forces or groups, offer marginalized youth a space where they feel included, and provide spaces to educate youth about the realities of life in armed groups. These centres can also help with training and employment efforts by, for example, organizing job information fairs and providing referrals to employment services and counselling. Informal youth drop-in centres may also attract young former combatants who are vulnerable to re-recruitment, and who did not go through DDR because of fear or misinformation, or because they managed to escape and are looking for help by themselves. Well-trained mentors who act as role models should manage these centres; \\\u203a Interaction between different youth organizations, networks and movements as well as youth centres, platforms and councils or others similar entitiescan provide opportunities to build trust between members of different communities. DDR practitioners should support programmes that encourage young people to initiate spaces that form bridges across conflict lines at community and state levels.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -149844,14 +149844,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "; \\n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \\n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media.", + "Sentence": "; \n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media.", "newParagraph": "recognition youth often recruited child andor face similar push pull risk factor ddr practitioner analyse structural social individuallevel risk factor outlined section 8 iddrs 520 child ddr designing implementing strategy prevent rerecruitment youth ddr practitioner also aware n youth participation armed conflict always driven negative motivation volunteerism armed group driven desire change social political landscape positive way participate something bigger oneself n gender must considered considering reason youth engagement although increasing number young woman girl involved conflict particularly longer conflict continue young men boy overrepresented armed force group pattern often result societal gender expectation value aggressive masculinity peaceable femininity young woman girl often serve armed force group non fighting role contribution difficult measure participation reintegration recovery critical peace building process marginalized woman girl remain higher risk rerecruitment societal expectation may implication role young woman men conflict well reintegrate following conflict see iddrs module 510 gender ddr important understand driver recruitment recruitment including different challenge male female youth may experience n cvr communitybased reintegration programme useful preventing recruitment youth see section 74 iddrs 230 community violence reduction iddrs 430 reintegration n young people play crucial role preventing spread rumour may fuel recruitment armed conflict particularly social medium different youth network organization may use connection factcheck rumour spread corrected information community n safe space may take form youth centre contextually appropriate gender sensitive form recommended created place young people interact centre allow youth meet street experience nonviolent excitement social connection provide alternative joining armed force group offer marginalized youth space feel included provide space educate youth reality life armed group centre also help training employment effort example organizing job information fair providing referral employment service counselling informal youth dropin centre may also attract young former combatant vulnerable rerecruitment go ddr fear misinformation managed escape looking help welltrained mentor act role model manage centre interaction different youth organization network movement well youth centre platform council others similar entitiescan provide opportunity build trust member different community ddr practitioner support programme encourage young people initiate space form bridge across conflict line community state level", "ProcessedSent": " n cvr communitybased reintegration programme useful preventing recruitment youth see section 74 iddrs 230 community violence reduction iddrs 430 reintegration n young people play crucial role preventing spread rumour may fuel recruitment armed conflict particularly social medium", "SentID": 8324 }, { "ParagraphID": 2440, - "Paragraph": "In recognition that youth are often recruited as children, and\/or face similar \u2018push\u2019 and \u2018pull\u2019 risk factors, DDR practitioners should analyse the structural, social, and individual-level risk factors outlined in section 8 of IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR when designing and implementing strategies to prevent the (re-)recruitment of youth. DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \\n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations. Volunteerism into armed groups can be driven by a desire to change the social and political landscape in positive ways and to participate in something bigger than oneself. \\n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement. Although an increasing number of young women and girls are involved in conflicts, particularly the longer conflicts continue, young men and boys are over-represented in armed forces and groups. This pattern is most often a result of societal gender expectations that value aggressive masculinity and peaceable femininity. While young women and girls often serve armed forces and groups in non- fighting roles and their contributions can be difficult to measure, their participation, reintegration and recovery is critical to peace building processes as marginalized women and girls remain at higher risk of (re)recruitment. Societal expectations may have implications for the roles of young women and men in conflict, as well as how they reintegrate following conflict (see IDDRS Module 5.10 Gender and DDR). It is important to understand the drivers for recruitment and re- recruitment, including the different challenges that male and female youth may experience.; \\n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \\n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media. Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \\n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other. Centres that allow youth to meet off the streets and experience non-violent excitement and social connection can provide alternatives to joining armed forces or groups, offer marginalized youth a space where they feel included, and provide spaces to educate youth about the realities of life in armed groups. These centres can also help with training and employment efforts by, for example, organizing job information fairs and providing referrals to employment services and counselling. Informal youth drop-in centres may also attract young former combatants who are vulnerable to re-recruitment, and who did not go through DDR because of fear or misinformation, or because they managed to escape and are looking for help by themselves. Well-trained mentors who act as role models should manage these centres; \\\u203a Interaction between different youth organizations, networks and movements as well as youth centres, platforms and councils or others similar entitiescan provide opportunities to build trust between members of different communities. DDR practitioners should support programmes that encourage young people to initiate spaces that form bridges across conflict lines at community and state levels.", + "Paragraph": "In recognition that youth are often recruited as children, and\/or face similar \u2018push\u2019 and \u2018pull\u2019 risk factors, DDR practitioners should analyse the structural, social, and individual-level risk factors outlined in section 8 of IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR when designing and implementing strategies to prevent the (re-)recruitment of youth. DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations. Volunteerism into armed groups can be driven by a desire to change the social and political landscape in positive ways and to participate in something bigger than oneself. \n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement. Although an increasing number of young women and girls are involved in conflicts, particularly the longer conflicts continue, young men and boys are over-represented in armed forces and groups. This pattern is most often a result of societal gender expectations that value aggressive masculinity and peaceable femininity. While young women and girls often serve armed forces and groups in non- fighting roles and their contributions can be difficult to measure, their participation, reintegration and recovery is critical to peace building processes as marginalized women and girls remain at higher risk of (re)recruitment. Societal expectations may have implications for the roles of young women and men in conflict, as well as how they reintegrate following conflict (see IDDRS Module 5.10 Gender and DDR). It is important to understand the drivers for recruitment and re- recruitment, including the different challenges that male and female youth may experience.; \n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media. Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other. Centres that allow youth to meet off the streets and experience non-violent excitement and social connection can provide alternatives to joining armed forces or groups, offer marginalized youth a space where they feel included, and provide spaces to educate youth about the realities of life in armed groups. These centres can also help with training and employment efforts by, for example, organizing job information fairs and providing referrals to employment services and counselling. Informal youth drop-in centres may also attract young former combatants who are vulnerable to re-recruitment, and who did not go through DDR because of fear or misinformation, or because they managed to escape and are looking for help by themselves. Well-trained mentors who act as role models should manage these centres; \\\u203a Interaction between different youth organizations, networks and movements as well as youth centres, platforms and councils or others similar entitiescan provide opportunities to build trust between members of different communities. DDR practitioners should support programmes that encourage young people to initiate spaces that form bridges across conflict lines at community and state levels.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -149862,14 +149862,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \\n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other.", + "Sentence": "Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other.", "newParagraph": "recognition youth often recruited child andor face similar push pull risk factor ddr practitioner analyse structural social individuallevel risk factor outlined section 8 iddrs 520 child ddr designing implementing strategy prevent rerecruitment youth ddr practitioner also aware n youth participation armed conflict always driven negative motivation volunteerism armed group driven desire change social political landscape positive way participate something bigger oneself n gender must considered considering reason youth engagement although increasing number young woman girl involved conflict particularly longer conflict continue young men boy overrepresented armed force group pattern often result societal gender expectation value aggressive masculinity peaceable femininity young woman girl often serve armed force group non fighting role contribution difficult measure participation reintegration recovery critical peace building process marginalized woman girl remain higher risk rerecruitment societal expectation may implication role young woman men conflict well reintegrate following conflict see iddrs module 510 gender ddr important understand driver recruitment recruitment including different challenge male female youth may experience n cvr communitybased reintegration programme useful preventing recruitment youth see section 74 iddrs 230 community violence reduction iddrs 430 reintegration n young people play crucial role preventing spread rumour may fuel recruitment armed conflict particularly social medium different youth network organization may use connection factcheck rumour spread corrected information community n safe space may take form youth centre contextually appropriate gender sensitive form recommended created place young people interact centre allow youth meet street experience nonviolent excitement social connection provide alternative joining armed force group offer marginalized youth space feel included provide space educate youth reality life armed group centre also help training employment effort example organizing job information fair providing referral employment service counselling informal youth dropin centre may also attract young former combatant vulnerable rerecruitment go ddr fear misinformation managed escape looking help welltrained mentor act role model manage centre interaction different youth organization network movement well youth centre platform council others similar entitiescan provide opportunity build trust member different community ddr practitioner support programme encourage young people initiate space form bridge across conflict line community state level", "ProcessedSent": "different youth network organization may use connection factcheck rumour spread corrected information community n safe space may take form youth centre contextually appropriate gender sensitive form recommended created place young people interact", "SentID": 8325 }, { "ParagraphID": 2440, - "Paragraph": "In recognition that youth are often recruited as children, and\/or face similar \u2018push\u2019 and \u2018pull\u2019 risk factors, DDR practitioners should analyse the structural, social, and individual-level risk factors outlined in section 8 of IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR when designing and implementing strategies to prevent the (re-)recruitment of youth. DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \\n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations. Volunteerism into armed groups can be driven by a desire to change the social and political landscape in positive ways and to participate in something bigger than oneself. \\n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement. Although an increasing number of young women and girls are involved in conflicts, particularly the longer conflicts continue, young men and boys are over-represented in armed forces and groups. This pattern is most often a result of societal gender expectations that value aggressive masculinity and peaceable femininity. While young women and girls often serve armed forces and groups in non- fighting roles and their contributions can be difficult to measure, their participation, reintegration and recovery is critical to peace building processes as marginalized women and girls remain at higher risk of (re)recruitment. Societal expectations may have implications for the roles of young women and men in conflict, as well as how they reintegrate following conflict (see IDDRS Module 5.10 Gender and DDR). It is important to understand the drivers for recruitment and re- recruitment, including the different challenges that male and female youth may experience.; \\n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \\n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media. Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \\n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other. Centres that allow youth to meet off the streets and experience non-violent excitement and social connection can provide alternatives to joining armed forces or groups, offer marginalized youth a space where they feel included, and provide spaces to educate youth about the realities of life in armed groups. These centres can also help with training and employment efforts by, for example, organizing job information fairs and providing referrals to employment services and counselling. Informal youth drop-in centres may also attract young former combatants who are vulnerable to re-recruitment, and who did not go through DDR because of fear or misinformation, or because they managed to escape and are looking for help by themselves. Well-trained mentors who act as role models should manage these centres; \\\u203a Interaction between different youth organizations, networks and movements as well as youth centres, platforms and councils or others similar entitiescan provide opportunities to build trust between members of different communities. DDR practitioners should support programmes that encourage young people to initiate spaces that form bridges across conflict lines at community and state levels.", + "Paragraph": "In recognition that youth are often recruited as children, and\/or face similar \u2018push\u2019 and \u2018pull\u2019 risk factors, DDR practitioners should analyse the structural, social, and individual-level risk factors outlined in section 8 of IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR when designing and implementing strategies to prevent the (re-)recruitment of youth. DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations. Volunteerism into armed groups can be driven by a desire to change the social and political landscape in positive ways and to participate in something bigger than oneself. \n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement. Although an increasing number of young women and girls are involved in conflicts, particularly the longer conflicts continue, young men and boys are over-represented in armed forces and groups. This pattern is most often a result of societal gender expectations that value aggressive masculinity and peaceable femininity. While young women and girls often serve armed forces and groups in non- fighting roles and their contributions can be difficult to measure, their participation, reintegration and recovery is critical to peace building processes as marginalized women and girls remain at higher risk of (re)recruitment. Societal expectations may have implications for the roles of young women and men in conflict, as well as how they reintegrate following conflict (see IDDRS Module 5.10 Gender and DDR). It is important to understand the drivers for recruitment and re- recruitment, including the different challenges that male and female youth may experience.; \n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media. Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other. Centres that allow youth to meet off the streets and experience non-violent excitement and social connection can provide alternatives to joining armed forces or groups, offer marginalized youth a space where they feel included, and provide spaces to educate youth about the realities of life in armed groups. These centres can also help with training and employment efforts by, for example, organizing job information fairs and providing referrals to employment services and counselling. Informal youth drop-in centres may also attract young former combatants who are vulnerable to re-recruitment, and who did not go through DDR because of fear or misinformation, or because they managed to escape and are looking for help by themselves. Well-trained mentors who act as role models should manage these centres; \\\u203a Interaction between different youth organizations, networks and movements as well as youth centres, platforms and councils or others similar entitiescan provide opportunities to build trust between members of different communities. DDR practitioners should support programmes that encourage young people to initiate spaces that form bridges across conflict lines at community and state levels.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -149887,7 +149887,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2440, - "Paragraph": "In recognition that youth are often recruited as children, and\/or face similar \u2018push\u2019 and \u2018pull\u2019 risk factors, DDR practitioners should analyse the structural, social, and individual-level risk factors outlined in section 8 of IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR when designing and implementing strategies to prevent the (re-)recruitment of youth. DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \\n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations. Volunteerism into armed groups can be driven by a desire to change the social and political landscape in positive ways and to participate in something bigger than oneself. \\n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement. Although an increasing number of young women and girls are involved in conflicts, particularly the longer conflicts continue, young men and boys are over-represented in armed forces and groups. This pattern is most often a result of societal gender expectations that value aggressive masculinity and peaceable femininity. While young women and girls often serve armed forces and groups in non- fighting roles and their contributions can be difficult to measure, their participation, reintegration and recovery is critical to peace building processes as marginalized women and girls remain at higher risk of (re)recruitment. Societal expectations may have implications for the roles of young women and men in conflict, as well as how they reintegrate following conflict (see IDDRS Module 5.10 Gender and DDR). It is important to understand the drivers for recruitment and re- recruitment, including the different challenges that male and female youth may experience.; \\n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \\n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media. Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \\n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other. Centres that allow youth to meet off the streets and experience non-violent excitement and social connection can provide alternatives to joining armed forces or groups, offer marginalized youth a space where they feel included, and provide spaces to educate youth about the realities of life in armed groups. These centres can also help with training and employment efforts by, for example, organizing job information fairs and providing referrals to employment services and counselling. Informal youth drop-in centres may also attract young former combatants who are vulnerable to re-recruitment, and who did not go through DDR because of fear or misinformation, or because they managed to escape and are looking for help by themselves. Well-trained mentors who act as role models should manage these centres; \\\u203a Interaction between different youth organizations, networks and movements as well as youth centres, platforms and councils or others similar entitiescan provide opportunities to build trust between members of different communities. DDR practitioners should support programmes that encourage young people to initiate spaces that form bridges across conflict lines at community and state levels.", + "Paragraph": "In recognition that youth are often recruited as children, and\/or face similar \u2018push\u2019 and \u2018pull\u2019 risk factors, DDR practitioners should analyse the structural, social, and individual-level risk factors outlined in section 8 of IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR when designing and implementing strategies to prevent the (re-)recruitment of youth. DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations. Volunteerism into armed groups can be driven by a desire to change the social and political landscape in positive ways and to participate in something bigger than oneself. \n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement. Although an increasing number of young women and girls are involved in conflicts, particularly the longer conflicts continue, young men and boys are over-represented in armed forces and groups. This pattern is most often a result of societal gender expectations that value aggressive masculinity and peaceable femininity. While young women and girls often serve armed forces and groups in non- fighting roles and their contributions can be difficult to measure, their participation, reintegration and recovery is critical to peace building processes as marginalized women and girls remain at higher risk of (re)recruitment. Societal expectations may have implications for the roles of young women and men in conflict, as well as how they reintegrate following conflict (see IDDRS Module 5.10 Gender and DDR). It is important to understand the drivers for recruitment and re- recruitment, including the different challenges that male and female youth may experience.; \n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media. Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other. Centres that allow youth to meet off the streets and experience non-violent excitement and social connection can provide alternatives to joining armed forces or groups, offer marginalized youth a space where they feel included, and provide spaces to educate youth about the realities of life in armed groups. These centres can also help with training and employment efforts by, for example, organizing job information fairs and providing referrals to employment services and counselling. Informal youth drop-in centres may also attract young former combatants who are vulnerable to re-recruitment, and who did not go through DDR because of fear or misinformation, or because they managed to escape and are looking for help by themselves. Well-trained mentors who act as role models should manage these centres; \\\u203a Interaction between different youth organizations, networks and movements as well as youth centres, platforms and councils or others similar entitiescan provide opportunities to build trust between members of different communities. DDR practitioners should support programmes that encourage young people to initiate spaces that form bridges across conflict lines at community and state levels.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -149905,7 +149905,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2440, - "Paragraph": "In recognition that youth are often recruited as children, and\/or face similar \u2018push\u2019 and \u2018pull\u2019 risk factors, DDR practitioners should analyse the structural, social, and individual-level risk factors outlined in section 8 of IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR when designing and implementing strategies to prevent the (re-)recruitment of youth. DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \\n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations. Volunteerism into armed groups can be driven by a desire to change the social and political landscape in positive ways and to participate in something bigger than oneself. \\n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement. Although an increasing number of young women and girls are involved in conflicts, particularly the longer conflicts continue, young men and boys are over-represented in armed forces and groups. This pattern is most often a result of societal gender expectations that value aggressive masculinity and peaceable femininity. While young women and girls often serve armed forces and groups in non- fighting roles and their contributions can be difficult to measure, their participation, reintegration and recovery is critical to peace building processes as marginalized women and girls remain at higher risk of (re)recruitment. Societal expectations may have implications for the roles of young women and men in conflict, as well as how they reintegrate following conflict (see IDDRS Module 5.10 Gender and DDR). It is important to understand the drivers for recruitment and re- recruitment, including the different challenges that male and female youth may experience.; \\n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \\n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media. Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \\n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other. Centres that allow youth to meet off the streets and experience non-violent excitement and social connection can provide alternatives to joining armed forces or groups, offer marginalized youth a space where they feel included, and provide spaces to educate youth about the realities of life in armed groups. These centres can also help with training and employment efforts by, for example, organizing job information fairs and providing referrals to employment services and counselling. Informal youth drop-in centres may also attract young former combatants who are vulnerable to re-recruitment, and who did not go through DDR because of fear or misinformation, or because they managed to escape and are looking for help by themselves. Well-trained mentors who act as role models should manage these centres; \\\u203a Interaction between different youth organizations, networks and movements as well as youth centres, platforms and councils or others similar entitiescan provide opportunities to build trust between members of different communities. DDR practitioners should support programmes that encourage young people to initiate spaces that form bridges across conflict lines at community and state levels.", + "Paragraph": "In recognition that youth are often recruited as children, and\/or face similar \u2018push\u2019 and \u2018pull\u2019 risk factors, DDR practitioners should analyse the structural, social, and individual-level risk factors outlined in section 8 of IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR when designing and implementing strategies to prevent the (re-)recruitment of youth. DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations. Volunteerism into armed groups can be driven by a desire to change the social and political landscape in positive ways and to participate in something bigger than oneself. \n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement. Although an increasing number of young women and girls are involved in conflicts, particularly the longer conflicts continue, young men and boys are over-represented in armed forces and groups. This pattern is most often a result of societal gender expectations that value aggressive masculinity and peaceable femininity. While young women and girls often serve armed forces and groups in non- fighting roles and their contributions can be difficult to measure, their participation, reintegration and recovery is critical to peace building processes as marginalized women and girls remain at higher risk of (re)recruitment. Societal expectations may have implications for the roles of young women and men in conflict, as well as how they reintegrate following conflict (see IDDRS Module 5.10 Gender and DDR). It is important to understand the drivers for recruitment and re- recruitment, including the different challenges that male and female youth may experience.; \n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media. Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other. Centres that allow youth to meet off the streets and experience non-violent excitement and social connection can provide alternatives to joining armed forces or groups, offer marginalized youth a space where they feel included, and provide spaces to educate youth about the realities of life in armed groups. These centres can also help with training and employment efforts by, for example, organizing job information fairs and providing referrals to employment services and counselling. Informal youth drop-in centres may also attract young former combatants who are vulnerable to re-recruitment, and who did not go through DDR because of fear or misinformation, or because they managed to escape and are looking for help by themselves. Well-trained mentors who act as role models should manage these centres; \\\u203a Interaction between different youth organizations, networks and movements as well as youth centres, platforms and councils or others similar entitiescan provide opportunities to build trust between members of different communities. DDR practitioners should support programmes that encourage young people to initiate spaces that form bridges across conflict lines at community and state levels.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -149923,7 +149923,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2440, - "Paragraph": "In recognition that youth are often recruited as children, and\/or face similar \u2018push\u2019 and \u2018pull\u2019 risk factors, DDR practitioners should analyse the structural, social, and individual-level risk factors outlined in section 8 of IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR when designing and implementing strategies to prevent the (re-)recruitment of youth. DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \\n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations. Volunteerism into armed groups can be driven by a desire to change the social and political landscape in positive ways and to participate in something bigger than oneself. \\n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement. Although an increasing number of young women and girls are involved in conflicts, particularly the longer conflicts continue, young men and boys are over-represented in armed forces and groups. This pattern is most often a result of societal gender expectations that value aggressive masculinity and peaceable femininity. While young women and girls often serve armed forces and groups in non- fighting roles and their contributions can be difficult to measure, their participation, reintegration and recovery is critical to peace building processes as marginalized women and girls remain at higher risk of (re)recruitment. Societal expectations may have implications for the roles of young women and men in conflict, as well as how they reintegrate following conflict (see IDDRS Module 5.10 Gender and DDR). It is important to understand the drivers for recruitment and re- recruitment, including the different challenges that male and female youth may experience.; \\n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \\n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media. Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \\n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other. Centres that allow youth to meet off the streets and experience non-violent excitement and social connection can provide alternatives to joining armed forces or groups, offer marginalized youth a space where they feel included, and provide spaces to educate youth about the realities of life in armed groups. These centres can also help with training and employment efforts by, for example, organizing job information fairs and providing referrals to employment services and counselling. Informal youth drop-in centres may also attract young former combatants who are vulnerable to re-recruitment, and who did not go through DDR because of fear or misinformation, or because they managed to escape and are looking for help by themselves. Well-trained mentors who act as role models should manage these centres; \\\u203a Interaction between different youth organizations, networks and movements as well as youth centres, platforms and councils or others similar entitiescan provide opportunities to build trust between members of different communities. DDR practitioners should support programmes that encourage young people to initiate spaces that form bridges across conflict lines at community and state levels.", + "Paragraph": "In recognition that youth are often recruited as children, and\/or face similar \u2018push\u2019 and \u2018pull\u2019 risk factors, DDR practitioners should analyse the structural, social, and individual-level risk factors outlined in section 8 of IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR when designing and implementing strategies to prevent the (re-)recruitment of youth. DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations. Volunteerism into armed groups can be driven by a desire to change the social and political landscape in positive ways and to participate in something bigger than oneself. \n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement. Although an increasing number of young women and girls are involved in conflicts, particularly the longer conflicts continue, young men and boys are over-represented in armed forces and groups. This pattern is most often a result of societal gender expectations that value aggressive masculinity and peaceable femininity. While young women and girls often serve armed forces and groups in non- fighting roles and their contributions can be difficult to measure, their participation, reintegration and recovery is critical to peace building processes as marginalized women and girls remain at higher risk of (re)recruitment. Societal expectations may have implications for the roles of young women and men in conflict, as well as how they reintegrate following conflict (see IDDRS Module 5.10 Gender and DDR). It is important to understand the drivers for recruitment and re- recruitment, including the different challenges that male and female youth may experience.; \n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media. Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other. Centres that allow youth to meet off the streets and experience non-violent excitement and social connection can provide alternatives to joining armed forces or groups, offer marginalized youth a space where they feel included, and provide spaces to educate youth about the realities of life in armed groups. These centres can also help with training and employment efforts by, for example, organizing job information fairs and providing referrals to employment services and counselling. Informal youth drop-in centres may also attract young former combatants who are vulnerable to re-recruitment, and who did not go through DDR because of fear or misinformation, or because they managed to escape and are looking for help by themselves. Well-trained mentors who act as role models should manage these centres; \\\u203a Interaction between different youth organizations, networks and movements as well as youth centres, platforms and councils or others similar entitiescan provide opportunities to build trust between members of different communities. DDR practitioners should support programmes that encourage young people to initiate spaces that form bridges across conflict lines at community and state levels.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -149941,7 +149941,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2440, - "Paragraph": "In recognition that youth are often recruited as children, and\/or face similar \u2018push\u2019 and \u2018pull\u2019 risk factors, DDR practitioners should analyse the structural, social, and individual-level risk factors outlined in section 8 of IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR when designing and implementing strategies to prevent the (re-)recruitment of youth. DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \\n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations. Volunteerism into armed groups can be driven by a desire to change the social and political landscape in positive ways and to participate in something bigger than oneself. \\n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement. Although an increasing number of young women and girls are involved in conflicts, particularly the longer conflicts continue, young men and boys are over-represented in armed forces and groups. This pattern is most often a result of societal gender expectations that value aggressive masculinity and peaceable femininity. While young women and girls often serve armed forces and groups in non- fighting roles and their contributions can be difficult to measure, their participation, reintegration and recovery is critical to peace building processes as marginalized women and girls remain at higher risk of (re)recruitment. Societal expectations may have implications for the roles of young women and men in conflict, as well as how they reintegrate following conflict (see IDDRS Module 5.10 Gender and DDR). It is important to understand the drivers for recruitment and re- recruitment, including the different challenges that male and female youth may experience.; \\n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \\n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media. Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \\n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other. Centres that allow youth to meet off the streets and experience non-violent excitement and social connection can provide alternatives to joining armed forces or groups, offer marginalized youth a space where they feel included, and provide spaces to educate youth about the realities of life in armed groups. These centres can also help with training and employment efforts by, for example, organizing job information fairs and providing referrals to employment services and counselling. Informal youth drop-in centres may also attract young former combatants who are vulnerable to re-recruitment, and who did not go through DDR because of fear or misinformation, or because they managed to escape and are looking for help by themselves. Well-trained mentors who act as role models should manage these centres; \\\u203a Interaction between different youth organizations, networks and movements as well as youth centres, platforms and councils or others similar entitiescan provide opportunities to build trust between members of different communities. DDR practitioners should support programmes that encourage young people to initiate spaces that form bridges across conflict lines at community and state levels.", + "Paragraph": "In recognition that youth are often recruited as children, and\/or face similar \u2018push\u2019 and \u2018pull\u2019 risk factors, DDR practitioners should analyse the structural, social, and individual-level risk factors outlined in section 8 of IDDRS 5.20 on Children and DDR when designing and implementing strategies to prevent the (re-)recruitment of youth. DDR practitioners should also be aware that: \n Youth participation in armed conflict is not always driven by negative motivations. Volunteerism into armed groups can be driven by a desire to change the social and political landscape in positive ways and to participate in something bigger than oneself. \n Gender must be considered when considering reasons for youth engagement. Although an increasing number of young women and girls are involved in conflicts, particularly the longer conflicts continue, young men and boys are over-represented in armed forces and groups. This pattern is most often a result of societal gender expectations that value aggressive masculinity and peaceable femininity. While young women and girls often serve armed forces and groups in non- fighting roles and their contributions can be difficult to measure, their participation, reintegration and recovery is critical to peace building processes as marginalized women and girls remain at higher risk of (re)recruitment. Societal expectations may have implications for the roles of young women and men in conflict, as well as how they reintegrate following conflict (see IDDRS Module 5.10 Gender and DDR). It is important to understand the drivers for recruitment and re- recruitment, including the different challenges that male and female youth may experience.; \n CVR and community-based reintegration programmes can be useful in preventing the (re-) recruitment of youth (see section 7.4 and IDDRS 2.30 on Community Violence Reduction and IDDRS 4.30 on Reintegration); \n Young people can play a crucial role in preventing the spread of rumours that may fuel recruitment and armed conflict, particularly through social media. Different youth networks and organizations may use their connections to fact-check rumours and then spread corrected information to their communities; \n \u2018Safe spaces\u2019 that may take the form of youth centres or other contextually appropriate and gender sensitive form are recommended to be created as a place for young people to interact with each other. Centres that allow youth to meet off the streets and experience non-violent excitement and social connection can provide alternatives to joining armed forces or groups, offer marginalized youth a space where they feel included, and provide spaces to educate youth about the realities of life in armed groups. These centres can also help with training and employment efforts by, for example, organizing job information fairs and providing referrals to employment services and counselling. Informal youth drop-in centres may also attract young former combatants who are vulnerable to re-recruitment, and who did not go through DDR because of fear or misinformation, or because they managed to escape and are looking for help by themselves. Well-trained mentors who act as role models should manage these centres; \\\u203a Interaction between different youth organizations, networks and movements as well as youth centres, platforms and councils or others similar entitiescan provide opportunities to build trust between members of different communities. DDR practitioners should support programmes that encourage young people to initiate spaces that form bridges across conflict lines at community and state levels.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -153109,7 +153109,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2483, - "Paragraph": "Vocational training should be accompanied by high quality employment counselling and livelihood or career guidance. Young people who have been engaged with an armed force or armed group may have no experience of looking for employment, no professional contacts, and may not know what they can do or even want to do. Employment counselling, career guidance and labour market information that is grounded in the realities of the context can help youth ex-combatants and youth formerly associated with an armed force or group to: \\n manage the change from the military to civilian life and from childhood to adulthood; \\n understand the labour market; \\n identify opportunities for work and learning; \\n build important attitudes and life skills; \\n make decisions; \\n plan their career and life.", + "Paragraph": "Vocational training should be accompanied by high quality employment counselling and livelihood or career guidance. Young people who have been engaged with an armed force or armed group may have no experience of looking for employment, no professional contacts, and may not know what they can do or even want to do. Employment counselling, career guidance and labour market information that is grounded in the realities of the context can help youth ex-combatants and youth formerly associated with an armed force or group to: \n manage the change from the military to civilian life and from childhood to adulthood; \n understand the labour market; \n identify opportunities for work and learning; \n build important attitudes and life skills; \n make decisions; \n plan their career and life.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -153127,7 +153127,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2483, - "Paragraph": "Vocational training should be accompanied by high quality employment counselling and livelihood or career guidance. Young people who have been engaged with an armed force or armed group may have no experience of looking for employment, no professional contacts, and may not know what they can do or even want to do. Employment counselling, career guidance and labour market information that is grounded in the realities of the context can help youth ex-combatants and youth formerly associated with an armed force or group to: \\n manage the change from the military to civilian life and from childhood to adulthood; \\n understand the labour market; \\n identify opportunities for work and learning; \\n build important attitudes and life skills; \\n make decisions; \\n plan their career and life.", + "Paragraph": "Vocational training should be accompanied by high quality employment counselling and livelihood or career guidance. Young people who have been engaged with an armed force or armed group may have no experience of looking for employment, no professional contacts, and may not know what they can do or even want to do. Employment counselling, career guidance and labour market information that is grounded in the realities of the context can help youth ex-combatants and youth formerly associated with an armed force or group to: \n manage the change from the military to civilian life and from childhood to adulthood; \n understand the labour market; \n identify opportunities for work and learning; \n build important attitudes and life skills; \n make decisions; \n plan their career and life.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -153145,7 +153145,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2483, - "Paragraph": "Vocational training should be accompanied by high quality employment counselling and livelihood or career guidance. Young people who have been engaged with an armed force or armed group may have no experience of looking for employment, no professional contacts, and may not know what they can do or even want to do. Employment counselling, career guidance and labour market information that is grounded in the realities of the context can help youth ex-combatants and youth formerly associated with an armed force or group to: \\n manage the change from the military to civilian life and from childhood to adulthood; \\n understand the labour market; \\n identify opportunities for work and learning; \\n build important attitudes and life skills; \\n make decisions; \\n plan their career and life.", + "Paragraph": "Vocational training should be accompanied by high quality employment counselling and livelihood or career guidance. Young people who have been engaged with an armed force or armed group may have no experience of looking for employment, no professional contacts, and may not know what they can do or even want to do. Employment counselling, career guidance and labour market information that is grounded in the realities of the context can help youth ex-combatants and youth formerly associated with an armed force or group to: \n manage the change from the military to civilian life and from childhood to adulthood; \n understand the labour market; \n identify opportunities for work and learning; \n build important attitudes and life skills; \n make decisions; \n plan their career and life.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -153156,7 +153156,7 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Reintegration", "Heading3": "7.2.9 Employment Services", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Employment counselling, career guidance and labour market information that is grounded in the realities of the context can help youth ex-combatants and youth formerly associated with an armed force or group to: \\n manage the change from the military to civilian life and from childhood to adulthood; \\n understand the labour market; \\n identify opportunities for work and learning; \\n build important attitudes and life skills; \\n make decisions; \\n plan their career and life.", + "Sentence": "Employment counselling, career guidance and labour market information that is grounded in the realities of the context can help youth ex-combatants and youth formerly associated with an armed force or group to: \n manage the change from the military to civilian life and from childhood to adulthood; \n understand the labour market; \n identify opportunities for work and learning; \n build important attitudes and life skills; \n make decisions; \n plan their career and life.", "newParagraph": "vocational training accompanied high quality employment counselling livelihood career guidance young people engaged armed force armed group may experience looking employment professional contact may know even want employment counselling career guidance labour market information grounded reality context help youth excombatants youth formerly associated armed force group n manage change military civilian life childhood adulthood n understand labour market n identify opportunity work learning n build important attitude life skill n make decision n plan career life", "ProcessedSent": "employment counselling career guidance labour market information grounded reality context help youth excombatants youth formerly associated armed force group n manage change military civilian life childhood adulthood n understand labour market n identify opportunity work learning n build important attitude life skill n make decision n plan career life", "SentID": 8508 @@ -154207,7 +154207,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2496, - "Paragraph": "As there is often severe competition in post-conflict labour markets, youth will often have very limited access to existing jobs. The large majority of youth will need to start their own businesses, in groups or individually. To increase their success rate, DDR practitioners should: \\n\\n develop young people\u2019s ability to deal with the problems they will face in the world of work through business development education. They should learn the following sets of skills: \\n being enterprising \u2014 learning to see and respond to opportunities; \\n business development skills \u2014 learning to investigate and develop a business idea; \\n business management skills \u2014 learning how to get a business going and manage it successfully. \\n\\n develop the capacities of young entrepreneurs to manage businesses that positively contribute to sustainable development in their communities and societies and that do no harm. \\n\\n encourage business persons and agricultural leaders to support young (or young potential) entrepreneurs during the vital first years of their new enterprise by transferring their knowledge, experience and contacts to them. They can do this by providing on-the-job learning, mentoring, including them in their networks and associations, and using youth businesses to supply their own businesses. The more support a young entrepreneur receives in the first years of their business, the better their chances of creating a sustainable business or of becoming more employable. \\n\\n ensure business-focused DDR activities align with national priorities and strategies in order to maximise potential access to resources and government support. \\n\\n provide access to business training. Among several business training methods, Start Your Business, for start-ups, and Start and Improve Your Business (SIYB) help train people who train entrepreneurs and through this multiplier effect, reach a large number of unemployed or potential business starters. SIYB is a sustainable and cost- effective method that equips young entrepreneurs with the practical management skills needed in a competitive business environment. If the illiteracy rate among young combatants is very high, other methods are available, such as Grassroots Management Training.4", + "Paragraph": "As there is often severe competition in post-conflict labour markets, youth will often have very limited access to existing jobs. The large majority of youth will need to start their own businesses, in groups or individually. To increase their success rate, DDR practitioners should: \n\n develop young people\u2019s ability to deal with the problems they will face in the world of work through business development education. They should learn the following sets of skills: \n being enterprising \u2014 learning to see and respond to opportunities; \n business development skills \u2014 learning to investigate and develop a business idea; \n business management skills \u2014 learning how to get a business going and manage it successfully. \n\n develop the capacities of young entrepreneurs to manage businesses that positively contribute to sustainable development in their communities and societies and that do no harm. \n\n encourage business persons and agricultural leaders to support young (or young potential) entrepreneurs during the vital first years of their new enterprise by transferring their knowledge, experience and contacts to them. They can do this by providing on-the-job learning, mentoring, including them in their networks and associations, and using youth businesses to supply their own businesses. The more support a young entrepreneur receives in the first years of their business, the better their chances of creating a sustainable business or of becoming more employable. \n\n ensure business-focused DDR activities align with national priorities and strategies in order to maximise potential access to resources and government support. \n\n provide access to business training. Among several business training methods, Start Your Business, for start-ups, and Start and Improve Your Business (SIYB) help train people who train entrepreneurs and through this multiplier effect, reach a large number of unemployed or potential business starters. SIYB is a sustainable and cost- effective method that equips young entrepreneurs with the practical management skills needed in a competitive business environment. If the illiteracy rate among young combatants is very high, other methods are available, such as Grassroots Management Training.4", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -154225,7 +154225,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2496, - "Paragraph": "As there is often severe competition in post-conflict labour markets, youth will often have very limited access to existing jobs. The large majority of youth will need to start their own businesses, in groups or individually. To increase their success rate, DDR practitioners should: \\n\\n develop young people\u2019s ability to deal with the problems they will face in the world of work through business development education. They should learn the following sets of skills: \\n being enterprising \u2014 learning to see and respond to opportunities; \\n business development skills \u2014 learning to investigate and develop a business idea; \\n business management skills \u2014 learning how to get a business going and manage it successfully. \\n\\n develop the capacities of young entrepreneurs to manage businesses that positively contribute to sustainable development in their communities and societies and that do no harm. \\n\\n encourage business persons and agricultural leaders to support young (or young potential) entrepreneurs during the vital first years of their new enterprise by transferring their knowledge, experience and contacts to them. They can do this by providing on-the-job learning, mentoring, including them in their networks and associations, and using youth businesses to supply their own businesses. The more support a young entrepreneur receives in the first years of their business, the better their chances of creating a sustainable business or of becoming more employable. \\n\\n ensure business-focused DDR activities align with national priorities and strategies in order to maximise potential access to resources and government support. \\n\\n provide access to business training. Among several business training methods, Start Your Business, for start-ups, and Start and Improve Your Business (SIYB) help train people who train entrepreneurs and through this multiplier effect, reach a large number of unemployed or potential business starters. SIYB is a sustainable and cost- effective method that equips young entrepreneurs with the practical management skills needed in a competitive business environment. If the illiteracy rate among young combatants is very high, other methods are available, such as Grassroots Management Training.4", + "Paragraph": "As there is often severe competition in post-conflict labour markets, youth will often have very limited access to existing jobs. The large majority of youth will need to start their own businesses, in groups or individually. To increase their success rate, DDR practitioners should: \n\n develop young people\u2019s ability to deal with the problems they will face in the world of work through business development education. They should learn the following sets of skills: \n being enterprising \u2014 learning to see and respond to opportunities; \n business development skills \u2014 learning to investigate and develop a business idea; \n business management skills \u2014 learning how to get a business going and manage it successfully. \n\n develop the capacities of young entrepreneurs to manage businesses that positively contribute to sustainable development in their communities and societies and that do no harm. \n\n encourage business persons and agricultural leaders to support young (or young potential) entrepreneurs during the vital first years of their new enterprise by transferring their knowledge, experience and contacts to them. They can do this by providing on-the-job learning, mentoring, including them in their networks and associations, and using youth businesses to supply their own businesses. The more support a young entrepreneur receives in the first years of their business, the better their chances of creating a sustainable business or of becoming more employable. \n\n ensure business-focused DDR activities align with national priorities and strategies in order to maximise potential access to resources and government support. \n\n provide access to business training. Among several business training methods, Start Your Business, for start-ups, and Start and Improve Your Business (SIYB) help train people who train entrepreneurs and through this multiplier effect, reach a large number of unemployed or potential business starters. SIYB is a sustainable and cost- effective method that equips young entrepreneurs with the practical management skills needed in a competitive business environment. If the illiteracy rate among young combatants is very high, other methods are available, such as Grassroots Management Training.4", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -154243,7 +154243,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2496, - "Paragraph": "As there is often severe competition in post-conflict labour markets, youth will often have very limited access to existing jobs. The large majority of youth will need to start their own businesses, in groups or individually. To increase their success rate, DDR practitioners should: \\n\\n develop young people\u2019s ability to deal with the problems they will face in the world of work through business development education. They should learn the following sets of skills: \\n being enterprising \u2014 learning to see and respond to opportunities; \\n business development skills \u2014 learning to investigate and develop a business idea; \\n business management skills \u2014 learning how to get a business going and manage it successfully. \\n\\n develop the capacities of young entrepreneurs to manage businesses that positively contribute to sustainable development in their communities and societies and that do no harm. \\n\\n encourage business persons and agricultural leaders to support young (or young potential) entrepreneurs during the vital first years of their new enterprise by transferring their knowledge, experience and contacts to them. They can do this by providing on-the-job learning, mentoring, including them in their networks and associations, and using youth businesses to supply their own businesses. The more support a young entrepreneur receives in the first years of their business, the better their chances of creating a sustainable business or of becoming more employable. \\n\\n ensure business-focused DDR activities align with national priorities and strategies in order to maximise potential access to resources and government support. \\n\\n provide access to business training. Among several business training methods, Start Your Business, for start-ups, and Start and Improve Your Business (SIYB) help train people who train entrepreneurs and through this multiplier effect, reach a large number of unemployed or potential business starters. SIYB is a sustainable and cost- effective method that equips young entrepreneurs with the practical management skills needed in a competitive business environment. If the illiteracy rate among young combatants is very high, other methods are available, such as Grassroots Management Training.4", + "Paragraph": "As there is often severe competition in post-conflict labour markets, youth will often have very limited access to existing jobs. The large majority of youth will need to start their own businesses, in groups or individually. To increase their success rate, DDR practitioners should: \n\n develop young people\u2019s ability to deal with the problems they will face in the world of work through business development education. They should learn the following sets of skills: \n being enterprising \u2014 learning to see and respond to opportunities; \n business development skills \u2014 learning to investigate and develop a business idea; \n business management skills \u2014 learning how to get a business going and manage it successfully. \n\n develop the capacities of young entrepreneurs to manage businesses that positively contribute to sustainable development in their communities and societies and that do no harm. \n\n encourage business persons and agricultural leaders to support young (or young potential) entrepreneurs during the vital first years of their new enterprise by transferring their knowledge, experience and contacts to them. They can do this by providing on-the-job learning, mentoring, including them in their networks and associations, and using youth businesses to supply their own businesses. The more support a young entrepreneur receives in the first years of their business, the better their chances of creating a sustainable business or of becoming more employable. \n\n ensure business-focused DDR activities align with national priorities and strategies in order to maximise potential access to resources and government support. \n\n provide access to business training. Among several business training methods, Start Your Business, for start-ups, and Start and Improve Your Business (SIYB) help train people who train entrepreneurs and through this multiplier effect, reach a large number of unemployed or potential business starters. SIYB is a sustainable and cost- effective method that equips young entrepreneurs with the practical management skills needed in a competitive business environment. If the illiteracy rate among young combatants is very high, other methods are available, such as Grassroots Management Training.4", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -154254,14 +154254,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Reintegration", "Heading3": "7.2.14 Youth Entrepreneurship", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "To increase their success rate, DDR practitioners should: \\n\\n develop young people\u2019s ability to deal with the problems they will face in the world of work through business development education.", + "Sentence": "To increase their success rate, DDR practitioners should: \n\n develop young people\u2019s ability to deal with the problems they will face in the world of work through business development education.", "newParagraph": "often severe competition postconflict labour market youth often limited access existing job large majority youth need start business group individually increase success rate ddr practitioner nn develop young people ability deal problem face world work business development education learn following set skill n enterprising learning see respond opportunity n business development skill learning investigate develop business idea n business management skill learning get business going manage successfully nn develop capacity young entrepreneur manage business positively contribute sustainable development community society harm nn encourage business person agricultural leader support young young potential entrepreneur vital first year new enterprise transferring knowledge experience contact providing onthejob learning mentoring including network association using youth business supply business support young entrepreneur receives first year business better chance creating sustainable business becoming employable nn ensure businessfocused ddr activity align national priority strategy order maximise potential access resource government support nn provide access business training among several business training method start business startup start improve business siyb help train people train entrepreneur multiplier effect reach large number unemployed potential business starter siyb sustainable cost effective method equips young entrepreneur practical management skill needed competitive business environment illiteracy rate among young combatant high method available grassroots management training4", "ProcessedSent": "increase success rate ddr practitioner nn develop young people ability deal problem face world work business development education", "SentID": 8569 }, { "ParagraphID": 2496, - "Paragraph": "As there is often severe competition in post-conflict labour markets, youth will often have very limited access to existing jobs. The large majority of youth will need to start their own businesses, in groups or individually. To increase their success rate, DDR practitioners should: \\n\\n develop young people\u2019s ability to deal with the problems they will face in the world of work through business development education. They should learn the following sets of skills: \\n being enterprising \u2014 learning to see and respond to opportunities; \\n business development skills \u2014 learning to investigate and develop a business idea; \\n business management skills \u2014 learning how to get a business going and manage it successfully. \\n\\n develop the capacities of young entrepreneurs to manage businesses that positively contribute to sustainable development in their communities and societies and that do no harm. \\n\\n encourage business persons and agricultural leaders to support young (or young potential) entrepreneurs during the vital first years of their new enterprise by transferring their knowledge, experience and contacts to them. They can do this by providing on-the-job learning, mentoring, including them in their networks and associations, and using youth businesses to supply their own businesses. The more support a young entrepreneur receives in the first years of their business, the better their chances of creating a sustainable business or of becoming more employable. \\n\\n ensure business-focused DDR activities align with national priorities and strategies in order to maximise potential access to resources and government support. \\n\\n provide access to business training. Among several business training methods, Start Your Business, for start-ups, and Start and Improve Your Business (SIYB) help train people who train entrepreneurs and through this multiplier effect, reach a large number of unemployed or potential business starters. SIYB is a sustainable and cost- effective method that equips young entrepreneurs with the practical management skills needed in a competitive business environment. If the illiteracy rate among young combatants is very high, other methods are available, such as Grassroots Management Training.4", + "Paragraph": "As there is often severe competition in post-conflict labour markets, youth will often have very limited access to existing jobs. The large majority of youth will need to start their own businesses, in groups or individually. To increase their success rate, DDR practitioners should: \n\n develop young people\u2019s ability to deal with the problems they will face in the world of work through business development education. They should learn the following sets of skills: \n being enterprising \u2014 learning to see and respond to opportunities; \n business development skills \u2014 learning to investigate and develop a business idea; \n business management skills \u2014 learning how to get a business going and manage it successfully. \n\n develop the capacities of young entrepreneurs to manage businesses that positively contribute to sustainable development in their communities and societies and that do no harm. \n\n encourage business persons and agricultural leaders to support young (or young potential) entrepreneurs during the vital first years of their new enterprise by transferring their knowledge, experience and contacts to them. They can do this by providing on-the-job learning, mentoring, including them in their networks and associations, and using youth businesses to supply their own businesses. The more support a young entrepreneur receives in the first years of their business, the better their chances of creating a sustainable business or of becoming more employable. \n\n ensure business-focused DDR activities align with national priorities and strategies in order to maximise potential access to resources and government support. \n\n provide access to business training. Among several business training methods, Start Your Business, for start-ups, and Start and Improve Your Business (SIYB) help train people who train entrepreneurs and through this multiplier effect, reach a large number of unemployed or potential business starters. SIYB is a sustainable and cost- effective method that equips young entrepreneurs with the practical management skills needed in a competitive business environment. If the illiteracy rate among young combatants is very high, other methods are available, such as Grassroots Management Training.4", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -154272,14 +154272,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Reintegration", "Heading3": "7.2.14 Youth Entrepreneurship", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "They should learn the following sets of skills: \\n being enterprising \u2014 learning to see and respond to opportunities; \\n business development skills \u2014 learning to investigate and develop a business idea; \\n business management skills \u2014 learning how to get a business going and manage it successfully.", + "Sentence": "They should learn the following sets of skills: \n being enterprising \u2014 learning to see and respond to opportunities; \n business development skills \u2014 learning to investigate and develop a business idea; \n business management skills \u2014 learning how to get a business going and manage it successfully.", "newParagraph": "often severe competition postconflict labour market youth often limited access existing job large majority youth need start business group individually increase success rate ddr practitioner nn develop young people ability deal problem face world work business development education learn following set skill n enterprising learning see respond opportunity n business development skill learning investigate develop business idea n business management skill learning get business going manage successfully nn develop capacity young entrepreneur manage business positively contribute sustainable development community society harm nn encourage business person agricultural leader support young young potential entrepreneur vital first year new enterprise transferring knowledge experience contact providing onthejob learning mentoring including network association using youth business supply business support young entrepreneur receives first year business better chance creating sustainable business becoming employable nn ensure businessfocused ddr activity align national priority strategy order maximise potential access resource government support nn provide access business training among several business training method start business startup start improve business siyb help train people train entrepreneur multiplier effect reach large number unemployed potential business starter siyb sustainable cost effective method equips young entrepreneur practical management skill needed competitive business environment illiteracy rate among young combatant high method available grassroots management training4", "ProcessedSent": "learn following set skill n enterprising learning see respond opportunity n business development skill learning investigate develop business idea n business management skill learning get business going manage successfully", "SentID": 8570 }, { "ParagraphID": 2496, - "Paragraph": "As there is often severe competition in post-conflict labour markets, youth will often have very limited access to existing jobs. The large majority of youth will need to start their own businesses, in groups or individually. To increase their success rate, DDR practitioners should: \\n\\n develop young people\u2019s ability to deal with the problems they will face in the world of work through business development education. They should learn the following sets of skills: \\n being enterprising \u2014 learning to see and respond to opportunities; \\n business development skills \u2014 learning to investigate and develop a business idea; \\n business management skills \u2014 learning how to get a business going and manage it successfully. \\n\\n develop the capacities of young entrepreneurs to manage businesses that positively contribute to sustainable development in their communities and societies and that do no harm. \\n\\n encourage business persons and agricultural leaders to support young (or young potential) entrepreneurs during the vital first years of their new enterprise by transferring their knowledge, experience and contacts to them. They can do this by providing on-the-job learning, mentoring, including them in their networks and associations, and using youth businesses to supply their own businesses. The more support a young entrepreneur receives in the first years of their business, the better their chances of creating a sustainable business or of becoming more employable. \\n\\n ensure business-focused DDR activities align with national priorities and strategies in order to maximise potential access to resources and government support. \\n\\n provide access to business training. Among several business training methods, Start Your Business, for start-ups, and Start and Improve Your Business (SIYB) help train people who train entrepreneurs and through this multiplier effect, reach a large number of unemployed or potential business starters. SIYB is a sustainable and cost- effective method that equips young entrepreneurs with the practical management skills needed in a competitive business environment. If the illiteracy rate among young combatants is very high, other methods are available, such as Grassroots Management Training.4", + "Paragraph": "As there is often severe competition in post-conflict labour markets, youth will often have very limited access to existing jobs. The large majority of youth will need to start their own businesses, in groups or individually. To increase their success rate, DDR practitioners should: \n\n develop young people\u2019s ability to deal with the problems they will face in the world of work through business development education. They should learn the following sets of skills: \n being enterprising \u2014 learning to see and respond to opportunities; \n business development skills \u2014 learning to investigate and develop a business idea; \n business management skills \u2014 learning how to get a business going and manage it successfully. \n\n develop the capacities of young entrepreneurs to manage businesses that positively contribute to sustainable development in their communities and societies and that do no harm. \n\n encourage business persons and agricultural leaders to support young (or young potential) entrepreneurs during the vital first years of their new enterprise by transferring their knowledge, experience and contacts to them. They can do this by providing on-the-job learning, mentoring, including them in their networks and associations, and using youth businesses to supply their own businesses. The more support a young entrepreneur receives in the first years of their business, the better their chances of creating a sustainable business or of becoming more employable. \n\n ensure business-focused DDR activities align with national priorities and strategies in order to maximise potential access to resources and government support. \n\n provide access to business training. Among several business training methods, Start Your Business, for start-ups, and Start and Improve Your Business (SIYB) help train people who train entrepreneurs and through this multiplier effect, reach a large number of unemployed or potential business starters. SIYB is a sustainable and cost- effective method that equips young entrepreneurs with the practical management skills needed in a competitive business environment. If the illiteracy rate among young combatants is very high, other methods are available, such as Grassroots Management Training.4", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -154290,14 +154290,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Reintegration", "Heading3": "7.2.14 Youth Entrepreneurship", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n develop the capacities of young entrepreneurs to manage businesses that positively contribute to sustainable development in their communities and societies and that do no harm.", + "Sentence": "\n\n develop the capacities of young entrepreneurs to manage businesses that positively contribute to sustainable development in their communities and societies and that do no harm.", "newParagraph": "often severe competition postconflict labour market youth often limited access existing job large majority youth need start business group individually increase success rate ddr practitioner nn develop young people ability deal problem face world work business development education learn following set skill n enterprising learning see respond opportunity n business development skill learning investigate develop business idea n business management skill learning get business going manage successfully nn develop capacity young entrepreneur manage business positively contribute sustainable development community society harm nn encourage business person agricultural leader support young young potential entrepreneur vital first year new enterprise transferring knowledge experience contact providing onthejob learning mentoring including network association using youth business supply business support young entrepreneur receives first year business better chance creating sustainable business becoming employable nn ensure businessfocused ddr activity align national priority strategy order maximise potential access resource government support nn provide access business training among several business training method start business startup start improve business siyb help train people train entrepreneur multiplier effect reach large number unemployed potential business starter siyb sustainable cost effective method equips young entrepreneur practical management skill needed competitive business environment illiteracy rate among young combatant high method available grassroots management training4", "ProcessedSent": "nn develop capacity young entrepreneur manage business positively contribute sustainable development community society harm", "SentID": 8571 }, { "ParagraphID": 2496, - "Paragraph": "As there is often severe competition in post-conflict labour markets, youth will often have very limited access to existing jobs. The large majority of youth will need to start their own businesses, in groups or individually. To increase their success rate, DDR practitioners should: \\n\\n develop young people\u2019s ability to deal with the problems they will face in the world of work through business development education. They should learn the following sets of skills: \\n being enterprising \u2014 learning to see and respond to opportunities; \\n business development skills \u2014 learning to investigate and develop a business idea; \\n business management skills \u2014 learning how to get a business going and manage it successfully. \\n\\n develop the capacities of young entrepreneurs to manage businesses that positively contribute to sustainable development in their communities and societies and that do no harm. \\n\\n encourage business persons and agricultural leaders to support young (or young potential) entrepreneurs during the vital first years of their new enterprise by transferring their knowledge, experience and contacts to them. They can do this by providing on-the-job learning, mentoring, including them in their networks and associations, and using youth businesses to supply their own businesses. The more support a young entrepreneur receives in the first years of their business, the better their chances of creating a sustainable business or of becoming more employable. \\n\\n ensure business-focused DDR activities align with national priorities and strategies in order to maximise potential access to resources and government support. \\n\\n provide access to business training. Among several business training methods, Start Your Business, for start-ups, and Start and Improve Your Business (SIYB) help train people who train entrepreneurs and through this multiplier effect, reach a large number of unemployed or potential business starters. SIYB is a sustainable and cost- effective method that equips young entrepreneurs with the practical management skills needed in a competitive business environment. If the illiteracy rate among young combatants is very high, other methods are available, such as Grassroots Management Training.4", + "Paragraph": "As there is often severe competition in post-conflict labour markets, youth will often have very limited access to existing jobs. The large majority of youth will need to start their own businesses, in groups or individually. To increase their success rate, DDR practitioners should: \n\n develop young people\u2019s ability to deal with the problems they will face in the world of work through business development education. They should learn the following sets of skills: \n being enterprising \u2014 learning to see and respond to opportunities; \n business development skills \u2014 learning to investigate and develop a business idea; \n business management skills \u2014 learning how to get a business going and manage it successfully. \n\n develop the capacities of young entrepreneurs to manage businesses that positively contribute to sustainable development in their communities and societies and that do no harm. \n\n encourage business persons and agricultural leaders to support young (or young potential) entrepreneurs during the vital first years of their new enterprise by transferring their knowledge, experience and contacts to them. They can do this by providing on-the-job learning, mentoring, including them in their networks and associations, and using youth businesses to supply their own businesses. The more support a young entrepreneur receives in the first years of their business, the better their chances of creating a sustainable business or of becoming more employable. \n\n ensure business-focused DDR activities align with national priorities and strategies in order to maximise potential access to resources and government support. \n\n provide access to business training. Among several business training methods, Start Your Business, for start-ups, and Start and Improve Your Business (SIYB) help train people who train entrepreneurs and through this multiplier effect, reach a large number of unemployed or potential business starters. SIYB is a sustainable and cost- effective method that equips young entrepreneurs with the practical management skills needed in a competitive business environment. If the illiteracy rate among young combatants is very high, other methods are available, such as Grassroots Management Training.4", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -154308,14 +154308,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Reintegration", "Heading3": "7.2.14 Youth Entrepreneurship", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n encourage business persons and agricultural leaders to support young (or young potential) entrepreneurs during the vital first years of their new enterprise by transferring their knowledge, experience and contacts to them.", + "Sentence": "\n\n encourage business persons and agricultural leaders to support young (or young potential) entrepreneurs during the vital first years of their new enterprise by transferring their knowledge, experience and contacts to them.", "newParagraph": "often severe competition postconflict labour market youth often limited access existing job large majority youth need start business group individually increase success rate ddr practitioner nn develop young people ability deal problem face world work business development education learn following set skill n enterprising learning see respond opportunity n business development skill learning investigate develop business idea n business management skill learning get business going manage successfully nn develop capacity young entrepreneur manage business positively contribute sustainable development community society harm nn encourage business person agricultural leader support young young potential entrepreneur vital first year new enterprise transferring knowledge experience contact providing onthejob learning mentoring including network association using youth business supply business support young entrepreneur receives first year business better chance creating sustainable business becoming employable nn ensure businessfocused ddr activity align national priority strategy order maximise potential access resource government support nn provide access business training among several business training method start business startup start improve business siyb help train people train entrepreneur multiplier effect reach large number unemployed potential business starter siyb sustainable cost effective method equips young entrepreneur practical management skill needed competitive business environment illiteracy rate among young combatant high method available grassroots management training4", "ProcessedSent": "nn encourage business person agricultural leader support young young potential entrepreneur vital first year new enterprise transferring knowledge experience contact", "SentID": 8572 }, { "ParagraphID": 2496, - "Paragraph": "As there is often severe competition in post-conflict labour markets, youth will often have very limited access to existing jobs. The large majority of youth will need to start their own businesses, in groups or individually. To increase their success rate, DDR practitioners should: \\n\\n develop young people\u2019s ability to deal with the problems they will face in the world of work through business development education. They should learn the following sets of skills: \\n being enterprising \u2014 learning to see and respond to opportunities; \\n business development skills \u2014 learning to investigate and develop a business idea; \\n business management skills \u2014 learning how to get a business going and manage it successfully. \\n\\n develop the capacities of young entrepreneurs to manage businesses that positively contribute to sustainable development in their communities and societies and that do no harm. \\n\\n encourage business persons and agricultural leaders to support young (or young potential) entrepreneurs during the vital first years of their new enterprise by transferring their knowledge, experience and contacts to them. They can do this by providing on-the-job learning, mentoring, including them in their networks and associations, and using youth businesses to supply their own businesses. The more support a young entrepreneur receives in the first years of their business, the better their chances of creating a sustainable business or of becoming more employable. \\n\\n ensure business-focused DDR activities align with national priorities and strategies in order to maximise potential access to resources and government support. \\n\\n provide access to business training. Among several business training methods, Start Your Business, for start-ups, and Start and Improve Your Business (SIYB) help train people who train entrepreneurs and through this multiplier effect, reach a large number of unemployed or potential business starters. SIYB is a sustainable and cost- effective method that equips young entrepreneurs with the practical management skills needed in a competitive business environment. If the illiteracy rate among young combatants is very high, other methods are available, such as Grassroots Management Training.4", + "Paragraph": "As there is often severe competition in post-conflict labour markets, youth will often have very limited access to existing jobs. The large majority of youth will need to start their own businesses, in groups or individually. To increase their success rate, DDR practitioners should: \n\n develop young people\u2019s ability to deal with the problems they will face in the world of work through business development education. They should learn the following sets of skills: \n being enterprising \u2014 learning to see and respond to opportunities; \n business development skills \u2014 learning to investigate and develop a business idea; \n business management skills \u2014 learning how to get a business going and manage it successfully. \n\n develop the capacities of young entrepreneurs to manage businesses that positively contribute to sustainable development in their communities and societies and that do no harm. \n\n encourage business persons and agricultural leaders to support young (or young potential) entrepreneurs during the vital first years of their new enterprise by transferring their knowledge, experience and contacts to them. They can do this by providing on-the-job learning, mentoring, including them in their networks and associations, and using youth businesses to supply their own businesses. The more support a young entrepreneur receives in the first years of their business, the better their chances of creating a sustainable business or of becoming more employable. \n\n ensure business-focused DDR activities align with national priorities and strategies in order to maximise potential access to resources and government support. \n\n provide access to business training. Among several business training methods, Start Your Business, for start-ups, and Start and Improve Your Business (SIYB) help train people who train entrepreneurs and through this multiplier effect, reach a large number of unemployed or potential business starters. SIYB is a sustainable and cost- effective method that equips young entrepreneurs with the practical management skills needed in a competitive business environment. If the illiteracy rate among young combatants is very high, other methods are available, such as Grassroots Management Training.4", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -154333,7 +154333,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2496, - "Paragraph": "As there is often severe competition in post-conflict labour markets, youth will often have very limited access to existing jobs. The large majority of youth will need to start their own businesses, in groups or individually. To increase their success rate, DDR practitioners should: \\n\\n develop young people\u2019s ability to deal with the problems they will face in the world of work through business development education. They should learn the following sets of skills: \\n being enterprising \u2014 learning to see and respond to opportunities; \\n business development skills \u2014 learning to investigate and develop a business idea; \\n business management skills \u2014 learning how to get a business going and manage it successfully. \\n\\n develop the capacities of young entrepreneurs to manage businesses that positively contribute to sustainable development in their communities and societies and that do no harm. \\n\\n encourage business persons and agricultural leaders to support young (or young potential) entrepreneurs during the vital first years of their new enterprise by transferring their knowledge, experience and contacts to them. They can do this by providing on-the-job learning, mentoring, including them in their networks and associations, and using youth businesses to supply their own businesses. The more support a young entrepreneur receives in the first years of their business, the better their chances of creating a sustainable business or of becoming more employable. \\n\\n ensure business-focused DDR activities align with national priorities and strategies in order to maximise potential access to resources and government support. \\n\\n provide access to business training. Among several business training methods, Start Your Business, for start-ups, and Start and Improve Your Business (SIYB) help train people who train entrepreneurs and through this multiplier effect, reach a large number of unemployed or potential business starters. SIYB is a sustainable and cost- effective method that equips young entrepreneurs with the practical management skills needed in a competitive business environment. If the illiteracy rate among young combatants is very high, other methods are available, such as Grassroots Management Training.4", + "Paragraph": "As there is often severe competition in post-conflict labour markets, youth will often have very limited access to existing jobs. The large majority of youth will need to start their own businesses, in groups or individually. To increase their success rate, DDR practitioners should: \n\n develop young people\u2019s ability to deal with the problems they will face in the world of work through business development education. They should learn the following sets of skills: \n being enterprising \u2014 learning to see and respond to opportunities; \n business development skills \u2014 learning to investigate and develop a business idea; \n business management skills \u2014 learning how to get a business going and manage it successfully. \n\n develop the capacities of young entrepreneurs to manage businesses that positively contribute to sustainable development in their communities and societies and that do no harm. \n\n encourage business persons and agricultural leaders to support young (or young potential) entrepreneurs during the vital first years of their new enterprise by transferring their knowledge, experience and contacts to them. They can do this by providing on-the-job learning, mentoring, including them in their networks and associations, and using youth businesses to supply their own businesses. The more support a young entrepreneur receives in the first years of their business, the better their chances of creating a sustainable business or of becoming more employable. \n\n ensure business-focused DDR activities align with national priorities and strategies in order to maximise potential access to resources and government support. \n\n provide access to business training. Among several business training methods, Start Your Business, for start-ups, and Start and Improve Your Business (SIYB) help train people who train entrepreneurs and through this multiplier effect, reach a large number of unemployed or potential business starters. SIYB is a sustainable and cost- effective method that equips young entrepreneurs with the practical management skills needed in a competitive business environment. If the illiteracy rate among young combatants is very high, other methods are available, such as Grassroots Management Training.4", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -154351,7 +154351,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2496, - "Paragraph": "As there is often severe competition in post-conflict labour markets, youth will often have very limited access to existing jobs. The large majority of youth will need to start their own businesses, in groups or individually. To increase their success rate, DDR practitioners should: \\n\\n develop young people\u2019s ability to deal with the problems they will face in the world of work through business development education. They should learn the following sets of skills: \\n being enterprising \u2014 learning to see and respond to opportunities; \\n business development skills \u2014 learning to investigate and develop a business idea; \\n business management skills \u2014 learning how to get a business going and manage it successfully. \\n\\n develop the capacities of young entrepreneurs to manage businesses that positively contribute to sustainable development in their communities and societies and that do no harm. \\n\\n encourage business persons and agricultural leaders to support young (or young potential) entrepreneurs during the vital first years of their new enterprise by transferring their knowledge, experience and contacts to them. They can do this by providing on-the-job learning, mentoring, including them in their networks and associations, and using youth businesses to supply their own businesses. The more support a young entrepreneur receives in the first years of their business, the better their chances of creating a sustainable business or of becoming more employable. \\n\\n ensure business-focused DDR activities align with national priorities and strategies in order to maximise potential access to resources and government support. \\n\\n provide access to business training. Among several business training methods, Start Your Business, for start-ups, and Start and Improve Your Business (SIYB) help train people who train entrepreneurs and through this multiplier effect, reach a large number of unemployed or potential business starters. SIYB is a sustainable and cost- effective method that equips young entrepreneurs with the practical management skills needed in a competitive business environment. If the illiteracy rate among young combatants is very high, other methods are available, such as Grassroots Management Training.4", + "Paragraph": "As there is often severe competition in post-conflict labour markets, youth will often have very limited access to existing jobs. The large majority of youth will need to start their own businesses, in groups or individually. To increase their success rate, DDR practitioners should: \n\n develop young people\u2019s ability to deal with the problems they will face in the world of work through business development education. They should learn the following sets of skills: \n being enterprising \u2014 learning to see and respond to opportunities; \n business development skills \u2014 learning to investigate and develop a business idea; \n business management skills \u2014 learning how to get a business going and manage it successfully. \n\n develop the capacities of young entrepreneurs to manage businesses that positively contribute to sustainable development in their communities and societies and that do no harm. \n\n encourage business persons and agricultural leaders to support young (or young potential) entrepreneurs during the vital first years of their new enterprise by transferring their knowledge, experience and contacts to them. They can do this by providing on-the-job learning, mentoring, including them in their networks and associations, and using youth businesses to supply their own businesses. The more support a young entrepreneur receives in the first years of their business, the better their chances of creating a sustainable business or of becoming more employable. \n\n ensure business-focused DDR activities align with national priorities and strategies in order to maximise potential access to resources and government support. \n\n provide access to business training. Among several business training methods, Start Your Business, for start-ups, and Start and Improve Your Business (SIYB) help train people who train entrepreneurs and through this multiplier effect, reach a large number of unemployed or potential business starters. SIYB is a sustainable and cost- effective method that equips young entrepreneurs with the practical management skills needed in a competitive business environment. If the illiteracy rate among young combatants is very high, other methods are available, such as Grassroots Management Training.4", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -154362,14 +154362,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Reintegration", "Heading3": "7.2.14 Youth Entrepreneurship", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n ensure business-focused DDR activities align with national priorities and strategies in order to maximise potential access to resources and government support.", + "Sentence": "\n\n ensure business-focused DDR activities align with national priorities and strategies in order to maximise potential access to resources and government support.", "newParagraph": "often severe competition postconflict labour market youth often limited access existing job large majority youth need start business group individually increase success rate ddr practitioner nn develop young people ability deal problem face world work business development education learn following set skill n enterprising learning see respond opportunity n business development skill learning investigate develop business idea n business management skill learning get business going manage successfully nn develop capacity young entrepreneur manage business positively contribute sustainable development community society harm nn encourage business person agricultural leader support young young potential entrepreneur vital first year new enterprise transferring knowledge experience contact providing onthejob learning mentoring including network association using youth business supply business support young entrepreneur receives first year business better chance creating sustainable business becoming employable nn ensure businessfocused ddr activity align national priority strategy order maximise potential access resource government support nn provide access business training among several business training method start business startup start improve business siyb help train people train entrepreneur multiplier effect reach large number unemployed potential business starter siyb sustainable cost effective method equips young entrepreneur practical management skill needed competitive business environment illiteracy rate among young combatant high method available grassroots management training4", "ProcessedSent": "nn ensure businessfocused ddr activity align national priority strategy order maximise potential access resource government support", "SentID": 8575 }, { "ParagraphID": 2496, - "Paragraph": "As there is often severe competition in post-conflict labour markets, youth will often have very limited access to existing jobs. The large majority of youth will need to start their own businesses, in groups or individually. To increase their success rate, DDR practitioners should: \\n\\n develop young people\u2019s ability to deal with the problems they will face in the world of work through business development education. They should learn the following sets of skills: \\n being enterprising \u2014 learning to see and respond to opportunities; \\n business development skills \u2014 learning to investigate and develop a business idea; \\n business management skills \u2014 learning how to get a business going and manage it successfully. \\n\\n develop the capacities of young entrepreneurs to manage businesses that positively contribute to sustainable development in their communities and societies and that do no harm. \\n\\n encourage business persons and agricultural leaders to support young (or young potential) entrepreneurs during the vital first years of their new enterprise by transferring their knowledge, experience and contacts to them. They can do this by providing on-the-job learning, mentoring, including them in their networks and associations, and using youth businesses to supply their own businesses. The more support a young entrepreneur receives in the first years of their business, the better their chances of creating a sustainable business or of becoming more employable. \\n\\n ensure business-focused DDR activities align with national priorities and strategies in order to maximise potential access to resources and government support. \\n\\n provide access to business training. Among several business training methods, Start Your Business, for start-ups, and Start and Improve Your Business (SIYB) help train people who train entrepreneurs and through this multiplier effect, reach a large number of unemployed or potential business starters. SIYB is a sustainable and cost- effective method that equips young entrepreneurs with the practical management skills needed in a competitive business environment. If the illiteracy rate among young combatants is very high, other methods are available, such as Grassroots Management Training.4", + "Paragraph": "As there is often severe competition in post-conflict labour markets, youth will often have very limited access to existing jobs. The large majority of youth will need to start their own businesses, in groups or individually. To increase their success rate, DDR practitioners should: \n\n develop young people\u2019s ability to deal with the problems they will face in the world of work through business development education. They should learn the following sets of skills: \n being enterprising \u2014 learning to see and respond to opportunities; \n business development skills \u2014 learning to investigate and develop a business idea; \n business management skills \u2014 learning how to get a business going and manage it successfully. \n\n develop the capacities of young entrepreneurs to manage businesses that positively contribute to sustainable development in their communities and societies and that do no harm. \n\n encourage business persons and agricultural leaders to support young (or young potential) entrepreneurs during the vital first years of their new enterprise by transferring their knowledge, experience and contacts to them. They can do this by providing on-the-job learning, mentoring, including them in their networks and associations, and using youth businesses to supply their own businesses. The more support a young entrepreneur receives in the first years of their business, the better their chances of creating a sustainable business or of becoming more employable. \n\n ensure business-focused DDR activities align with national priorities and strategies in order to maximise potential access to resources and government support. \n\n provide access to business training. Among several business training methods, Start Your Business, for start-ups, and Start and Improve Your Business (SIYB) help train people who train entrepreneurs and through this multiplier effect, reach a large number of unemployed or potential business starters. SIYB is a sustainable and cost- effective method that equips young entrepreneurs with the practical management skills needed in a competitive business environment. If the illiteracy rate among young combatants is very high, other methods are available, such as Grassroots Management Training.4", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -154380,14 +154380,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Reintegration", "Heading3": "7.2.14 Youth Entrepreneurship", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n provide access to business training.", + "Sentence": "\n\n provide access to business training.", "newParagraph": "often severe competition postconflict labour market youth often limited access existing job large majority youth need start business group individually increase success rate ddr practitioner nn develop young people ability deal problem face world work business development education learn following set skill n enterprising learning see respond opportunity n business development skill learning investigate develop business idea n business management skill learning get business going manage successfully nn develop capacity young entrepreneur manage business positively contribute sustainable development community society harm nn encourage business person agricultural leader support young young potential entrepreneur vital first year new enterprise transferring knowledge experience contact providing onthejob learning mentoring including network association using youth business supply business support young entrepreneur receives first year business better chance creating sustainable business becoming employable nn ensure businessfocused ddr activity align national priority strategy order maximise potential access resource government support nn provide access business training among several business training method start business startup start improve business siyb help train people train entrepreneur multiplier effect reach large number unemployed potential business starter siyb sustainable cost effective method equips young entrepreneur practical management skill needed competitive business environment illiteracy rate among young combatant high method available grassroots management training4", "ProcessedSent": "nn provide access business training", "SentID": 8576 }, { "ParagraphID": 2496, - "Paragraph": "As there is often severe competition in post-conflict labour markets, youth will often have very limited access to existing jobs. The large majority of youth will need to start their own businesses, in groups or individually. To increase their success rate, DDR practitioners should: \\n\\n develop young people\u2019s ability to deal with the problems they will face in the world of work through business development education. They should learn the following sets of skills: \\n being enterprising \u2014 learning to see and respond to opportunities; \\n business development skills \u2014 learning to investigate and develop a business idea; \\n business management skills \u2014 learning how to get a business going and manage it successfully. \\n\\n develop the capacities of young entrepreneurs to manage businesses that positively contribute to sustainable development in their communities and societies and that do no harm. \\n\\n encourage business persons and agricultural leaders to support young (or young potential) entrepreneurs during the vital first years of their new enterprise by transferring their knowledge, experience and contacts to them. They can do this by providing on-the-job learning, mentoring, including them in their networks and associations, and using youth businesses to supply their own businesses. The more support a young entrepreneur receives in the first years of their business, the better their chances of creating a sustainable business or of becoming more employable. \\n\\n ensure business-focused DDR activities align with national priorities and strategies in order to maximise potential access to resources and government support. \\n\\n provide access to business training. Among several business training methods, Start Your Business, for start-ups, and Start and Improve Your Business (SIYB) help train people who train entrepreneurs and through this multiplier effect, reach a large number of unemployed or potential business starters. SIYB is a sustainable and cost- effective method that equips young entrepreneurs with the practical management skills needed in a competitive business environment. If the illiteracy rate among young combatants is very high, other methods are available, such as Grassroots Management Training.4", + "Paragraph": "As there is often severe competition in post-conflict labour markets, youth will often have very limited access to existing jobs. The large majority of youth will need to start their own businesses, in groups or individually. To increase their success rate, DDR practitioners should: \n\n develop young people\u2019s ability to deal with the problems they will face in the world of work through business development education. They should learn the following sets of skills: \n being enterprising \u2014 learning to see and respond to opportunities; \n business development skills \u2014 learning to investigate and develop a business idea; \n business management skills \u2014 learning how to get a business going and manage it successfully. \n\n develop the capacities of young entrepreneurs to manage businesses that positively contribute to sustainable development in their communities and societies and that do no harm. \n\n encourage business persons and agricultural leaders to support young (or young potential) entrepreneurs during the vital first years of their new enterprise by transferring their knowledge, experience and contacts to them. They can do this by providing on-the-job learning, mentoring, including them in their networks and associations, and using youth businesses to supply their own businesses. The more support a young entrepreneur receives in the first years of their business, the better their chances of creating a sustainable business or of becoming more employable. \n\n ensure business-focused DDR activities align with national priorities and strategies in order to maximise potential access to resources and government support. \n\n provide access to business training. Among several business training methods, Start Your Business, for start-ups, and Start and Improve Your Business (SIYB) help train people who train entrepreneurs and through this multiplier effect, reach a large number of unemployed or potential business starters. SIYB is a sustainable and cost- effective method that equips young entrepreneurs with the practical management skills needed in a competitive business environment. If the illiteracy rate among young combatants is very high, other methods are available, such as Grassroots Management Training.4", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -154405,7 +154405,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2496, - "Paragraph": "As there is often severe competition in post-conflict labour markets, youth will often have very limited access to existing jobs. The large majority of youth will need to start their own businesses, in groups or individually. To increase their success rate, DDR practitioners should: \\n\\n develop young people\u2019s ability to deal with the problems they will face in the world of work through business development education. They should learn the following sets of skills: \\n being enterprising \u2014 learning to see and respond to opportunities; \\n business development skills \u2014 learning to investigate and develop a business idea; \\n business management skills \u2014 learning how to get a business going and manage it successfully. \\n\\n develop the capacities of young entrepreneurs to manage businesses that positively contribute to sustainable development in their communities and societies and that do no harm. \\n\\n encourage business persons and agricultural leaders to support young (or young potential) entrepreneurs during the vital first years of their new enterprise by transferring their knowledge, experience and contacts to them. They can do this by providing on-the-job learning, mentoring, including them in their networks and associations, and using youth businesses to supply their own businesses. The more support a young entrepreneur receives in the first years of their business, the better their chances of creating a sustainable business or of becoming more employable. \\n\\n ensure business-focused DDR activities align with national priorities and strategies in order to maximise potential access to resources and government support. \\n\\n provide access to business training. Among several business training methods, Start Your Business, for start-ups, and Start and Improve Your Business (SIYB) help train people who train entrepreneurs and through this multiplier effect, reach a large number of unemployed or potential business starters. SIYB is a sustainable and cost- effective method that equips young entrepreneurs with the practical management skills needed in a competitive business environment. If the illiteracy rate among young combatants is very high, other methods are available, such as Grassroots Management Training.4", + "Paragraph": "As there is often severe competition in post-conflict labour markets, youth will often have very limited access to existing jobs. The large majority of youth will need to start their own businesses, in groups or individually. To increase their success rate, DDR practitioners should: \n\n develop young people\u2019s ability to deal with the problems they will face in the world of work through business development education. They should learn the following sets of skills: \n being enterprising \u2014 learning to see and respond to opportunities; \n business development skills \u2014 learning to investigate and develop a business idea; \n business management skills \u2014 learning how to get a business going and manage it successfully. \n\n develop the capacities of young entrepreneurs to manage businesses that positively contribute to sustainable development in their communities and societies and that do no harm. \n\n encourage business persons and agricultural leaders to support young (or young potential) entrepreneurs during the vital first years of their new enterprise by transferring their knowledge, experience and contacts to them. They can do this by providing on-the-job learning, mentoring, including them in their networks and associations, and using youth businesses to supply their own businesses. The more support a young entrepreneur receives in the first years of their business, the better their chances of creating a sustainable business or of becoming more employable. \n\n ensure business-focused DDR activities align with national priorities and strategies in order to maximise potential access to resources and government support. \n\n provide access to business training. Among several business training methods, Start Your Business, for start-ups, and Start and Improve Your Business (SIYB) help train people who train entrepreneurs and through this multiplier effect, reach a large number of unemployed or potential business starters. SIYB is a sustainable and cost- effective method that equips young entrepreneurs with the practical management skills needed in a competitive business environment. If the illiteracy rate among young combatants is very high, other methods are available, such as Grassroots Management Training.4", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -154423,7 +154423,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2496, - "Paragraph": "As there is often severe competition in post-conflict labour markets, youth will often have very limited access to existing jobs. The large majority of youth will need to start their own businesses, in groups or individually. To increase their success rate, DDR practitioners should: \\n\\n develop young people\u2019s ability to deal with the problems they will face in the world of work through business development education. They should learn the following sets of skills: \\n being enterprising \u2014 learning to see and respond to opportunities; \\n business development skills \u2014 learning to investigate and develop a business idea; \\n business management skills \u2014 learning how to get a business going and manage it successfully. \\n\\n develop the capacities of young entrepreneurs to manage businesses that positively contribute to sustainable development in their communities and societies and that do no harm. \\n\\n encourage business persons and agricultural leaders to support young (or young potential) entrepreneurs during the vital first years of their new enterprise by transferring their knowledge, experience and contacts to them. They can do this by providing on-the-job learning, mentoring, including them in their networks and associations, and using youth businesses to supply their own businesses. The more support a young entrepreneur receives in the first years of their business, the better their chances of creating a sustainable business or of becoming more employable. \\n\\n ensure business-focused DDR activities align with national priorities and strategies in order to maximise potential access to resources and government support. \\n\\n provide access to business training. Among several business training methods, Start Your Business, for start-ups, and Start and Improve Your Business (SIYB) help train people who train entrepreneurs and through this multiplier effect, reach a large number of unemployed or potential business starters. SIYB is a sustainable and cost- effective method that equips young entrepreneurs with the practical management skills needed in a competitive business environment. If the illiteracy rate among young combatants is very high, other methods are available, such as Grassroots Management Training.4", + "Paragraph": "As there is often severe competition in post-conflict labour markets, youth will often have very limited access to existing jobs. The large majority of youth will need to start their own businesses, in groups or individually. To increase their success rate, DDR practitioners should: \n\n develop young people\u2019s ability to deal with the problems they will face in the world of work through business development education. They should learn the following sets of skills: \n being enterprising \u2014 learning to see and respond to opportunities; \n business development skills \u2014 learning to investigate and develop a business idea; \n business management skills \u2014 learning how to get a business going and manage it successfully. \n\n develop the capacities of young entrepreneurs to manage businesses that positively contribute to sustainable development in their communities and societies and that do no harm. \n\n encourage business persons and agricultural leaders to support young (or young potential) entrepreneurs during the vital first years of their new enterprise by transferring their knowledge, experience and contacts to them. They can do this by providing on-the-job learning, mentoring, including them in their networks and associations, and using youth businesses to supply their own businesses. The more support a young entrepreneur receives in the first years of their business, the better their chances of creating a sustainable business or of becoming more employable. \n\n ensure business-focused DDR activities align with national priorities and strategies in order to maximise potential access to resources and government support. \n\n provide access to business training. Among several business training methods, Start Your Business, for start-ups, and Start and Improve Your Business (SIYB) help train people who train entrepreneurs and through this multiplier effect, reach a large number of unemployed or potential business starters. SIYB is a sustainable and cost- effective method that equips young entrepreneurs with the practical management skills needed in a competitive business environment. If the illiteracy rate among young combatants is very high, other methods are available, such as Grassroots Management Training.4", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -154621,7 +154621,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2499, - "Paragraph": "A number of issues may also need to be tackled in relation to youth entrepreneurship, including: \\n the need for investment in premises and equipment (a warehouse, marketplace, cooling stores, workplace, equipment); \\n the size and nature of the local market (purchasing power and availability of raw materials); \\n the economic infrastructure (roads, communications, energy); and \\n the safety of the environment and of any new equipment.", + "Paragraph": "A number of issues may also need to be tackled in relation to youth entrepreneurship, including: \n the need for investment in premises and equipment (a warehouse, marketplace, cooling stores, workplace, equipment); \n the size and nature of the local market (purchasing power and availability of raw materials); \n the economic infrastructure (roads, communications, energy); and \n the safety of the environment and of any new equipment.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -154632,7 +154632,7 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Reintegration", "Heading3": "7.2.14 Youth Entrepreneurship", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "A number of issues may also need to be tackled in relation to youth entrepreneurship, including: \\n the need for investment in premises and equipment (a warehouse, marketplace, cooling stores, workplace, equipment); \\n the size and nature of the local market (purchasing power and availability of raw materials); \\n the economic infrastructure (roads, communications, energy); and \\n the safety of the environment and of any new equipment.", + "Sentence": "A number of issues may also need to be tackled in relation to youth entrepreneurship, including: \n the need for investment in premises and equipment (a warehouse, marketplace, cooling stores, workplace, equipment); \n the size and nature of the local market (purchasing power and availability of raw materials); \n the economic infrastructure (roads, communications, energy); and \n the safety of the environment and of any new equipment.", "newParagraph": "number issue may also need tackled relation youth entrepreneurship including n need investment premise equipment warehouse marketplace cooling store workplace equipment n size nature local market purchasing power availability raw material n economic infrastructure road communication energy n safety environment new equipment", "ProcessedSent": "number issue may also need tackled relation youth entrepreneurship including n need investment premise equipment warehouse marketplace cooling store workplace equipment n size nature local market purchasing power availability raw material n economic infrastructure road communication energy n safety environment new equipment", "SentID": 8590 @@ -155251,7 +155251,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2511, - "Paragraph": "Youth ex-combatants and youth formerly associated with armed forces and groups have the potential to play a significant, positive role in peace building. Reintegration programmes should therefore make significant resources available to promote youth as agents of change. Programmatic interventions seeking to promote the role of youth as peaceful agents of change might include: \\n a training programme for youth (former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) in political mediation, grassroots organization and advocacy. \\n a youth-led community peace education programme utilising creative platforms (e.g. sport, music, visual arts, theatre and dance) to promote a culture of non-violence and peace \\n a youth managed peer education and mentoring programme promoting equality, trust and thought-provoking learning on issues such as SGBV, social inclusion, violence prevention, climate change and sustainable development, among others. \\n an activity reusing scrapped weapons for artistic and symbolic purposes could be included as a reintegration activity involving community youth in an effort to build confidence and connections between youth, as well as leave lasting messages for peace in communities. \\n a small grants facility for youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) supporting youth designed and implemented social programmes that have an articulated community benefit. \\n a community-driven development facility that brings youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) together with community leaders to identify, design and implement small infrastructure projects benefiting the community (and providing employment). \\n a local-level political forum that enables youth to engagement in local decision-making processes and provides referral services for access to resources. \\n a national dialogue process, coordinating with other relevant youth actors, to lobby for greater youth participation in the formal political process and give youth a seat at the table at local, sub- national and national levels.", + "Paragraph": "Youth ex-combatants and youth formerly associated with armed forces and groups have the potential to play a significant, positive role in peace building. Reintegration programmes should therefore make significant resources available to promote youth as agents of change. Programmatic interventions seeking to promote the role of youth as peaceful agents of change might include: \n a training programme for youth (former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) in political mediation, grassroots organization and advocacy. \n a youth-led community peace education programme utilising creative platforms (e.g. sport, music, visual arts, theatre and dance) to promote a culture of non-violence and peace \n a youth managed peer education and mentoring programme promoting equality, trust and thought-provoking learning on issues such as SGBV, social inclusion, violence prevention, climate change and sustainable development, among others. \n an activity reusing scrapped weapons for artistic and symbolic purposes could be included as a reintegration activity involving community youth in an effort to build confidence and connections between youth, as well as leave lasting messages for peace in communities. \n a small grants facility for youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) supporting youth designed and implemented social programmes that have an articulated community benefit. \n a community-driven development facility that brings youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) together with community leaders to identify, design and implement small infrastructure projects benefiting the community (and providing employment). \n a local-level political forum that enables youth to engagement in local decision-making processes and provides referral services for access to resources. \n a national dialogue process, coordinating with other relevant youth actors, to lobby for greater youth participation in the formal political process and give youth a seat at the table at local, sub- national and national levels.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -155269,7 +155269,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2511, - "Paragraph": "Youth ex-combatants and youth formerly associated with armed forces and groups have the potential to play a significant, positive role in peace building. Reintegration programmes should therefore make significant resources available to promote youth as agents of change. Programmatic interventions seeking to promote the role of youth as peaceful agents of change might include: \\n a training programme for youth (former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) in political mediation, grassroots organization and advocacy. \\n a youth-led community peace education programme utilising creative platforms (e.g. sport, music, visual arts, theatre and dance) to promote a culture of non-violence and peace \\n a youth managed peer education and mentoring programme promoting equality, trust and thought-provoking learning on issues such as SGBV, social inclusion, violence prevention, climate change and sustainable development, among others. \\n an activity reusing scrapped weapons for artistic and symbolic purposes could be included as a reintegration activity involving community youth in an effort to build confidence and connections between youth, as well as leave lasting messages for peace in communities. \\n a small grants facility for youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) supporting youth designed and implemented social programmes that have an articulated community benefit. \\n a community-driven development facility that brings youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) together with community leaders to identify, design and implement small infrastructure projects benefiting the community (and providing employment). \\n a local-level political forum that enables youth to engagement in local decision-making processes and provides referral services for access to resources. \\n a national dialogue process, coordinating with other relevant youth actors, to lobby for greater youth participation in the formal political process and give youth a seat at the table at local, sub- national and national levels.", + "Paragraph": "Youth ex-combatants and youth formerly associated with armed forces and groups have the potential to play a significant, positive role in peace building. Reintegration programmes should therefore make significant resources available to promote youth as agents of change. Programmatic interventions seeking to promote the role of youth as peaceful agents of change might include: \n a training programme for youth (former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) in political mediation, grassroots organization and advocacy. \n a youth-led community peace education programme utilising creative platforms (e.g. sport, music, visual arts, theatre and dance) to promote a culture of non-violence and peace \n a youth managed peer education and mentoring programme promoting equality, trust and thought-provoking learning on issues such as SGBV, social inclusion, violence prevention, climate change and sustainable development, among others. \n an activity reusing scrapped weapons for artistic and symbolic purposes could be included as a reintegration activity involving community youth in an effort to build confidence and connections between youth, as well as leave lasting messages for peace in communities. \n a small grants facility for youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) supporting youth designed and implemented social programmes that have an articulated community benefit. \n a community-driven development facility that brings youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) together with community leaders to identify, design and implement small infrastructure projects benefiting the community (and providing employment). \n a local-level political forum that enables youth to engagement in local decision-making processes and provides referral services for access to resources. \n a national dialogue process, coordinating with other relevant youth actors, to lobby for greater youth participation in the formal political process and give youth a seat at the table at local, sub- national and national levels.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -155287,7 +155287,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2511, - "Paragraph": "Youth ex-combatants and youth formerly associated with armed forces and groups have the potential to play a significant, positive role in peace building. Reintegration programmes should therefore make significant resources available to promote youth as agents of change. Programmatic interventions seeking to promote the role of youth as peaceful agents of change might include: \\n a training programme for youth (former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) in political mediation, grassroots organization and advocacy. \\n a youth-led community peace education programme utilising creative platforms (e.g. sport, music, visual arts, theatre and dance) to promote a culture of non-violence and peace \\n a youth managed peer education and mentoring programme promoting equality, trust and thought-provoking learning on issues such as SGBV, social inclusion, violence prevention, climate change and sustainable development, among others. \\n an activity reusing scrapped weapons for artistic and symbolic purposes could be included as a reintegration activity involving community youth in an effort to build confidence and connections between youth, as well as leave lasting messages for peace in communities. \\n a small grants facility for youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) supporting youth designed and implemented social programmes that have an articulated community benefit. \\n a community-driven development facility that brings youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) together with community leaders to identify, design and implement small infrastructure projects benefiting the community (and providing employment). \\n a local-level political forum that enables youth to engagement in local decision-making processes and provides referral services for access to resources. \\n a national dialogue process, coordinating with other relevant youth actors, to lobby for greater youth participation in the formal political process and give youth a seat at the table at local, sub- national and national levels.", + "Paragraph": "Youth ex-combatants and youth formerly associated with armed forces and groups have the potential to play a significant, positive role in peace building. Reintegration programmes should therefore make significant resources available to promote youth as agents of change. Programmatic interventions seeking to promote the role of youth as peaceful agents of change might include: \n a training programme for youth (former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) in political mediation, grassroots organization and advocacy. \n a youth-led community peace education programme utilising creative platforms (e.g. sport, music, visual arts, theatre and dance) to promote a culture of non-violence and peace \n a youth managed peer education and mentoring programme promoting equality, trust and thought-provoking learning on issues such as SGBV, social inclusion, violence prevention, climate change and sustainable development, among others. \n an activity reusing scrapped weapons for artistic and symbolic purposes could be included as a reintegration activity involving community youth in an effort to build confidence and connections between youth, as well as leave lasting messages for peace in communities. \n a small grants facility for youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) supporting youth designed and implemented social programmes that have an articulated community benefit. \n a community-driven development facility that brings youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) together with community leaders to identify, design and implement small infrastructure projects benefiting the community (and providing employment). \n a local-level political forum that enables youth to engagement in local decision-making processes and provides referral services for access to resources. \n a national dialogue process, coordinating with other relevant youth actors, to lobby for greater youth participation in the formal political process and give youth a seat at the table at local, sub- national and national levels.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -155298,14 +155298,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Reintegration", "Heading3": "7.2.17 Voice, participation and representation", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Programmatic interventions seeking to promote the role of youth as peaceful agents of change might include: \\n a training programme for youth (former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) in political mediation, grassroots organization and advocacy.", + "Sentence": "Programmatic interventions seeking to promote the role of youth as peaceful agents of change might include: \n a training programme for youth (former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) in political mediation, grassroots organization and advocacy.", "newParagraph": "youth excombatants youth formerly associated armed force group potential play significant positive role peace building reintegration programme therefore make significant resource available promote youth agent change programmatic intervention seeking promote role youth peaceful agent change might include n training programme youth former member armed force group otherwise political mediation grassroots organization advocacy n youthled community peace education programme utilising creative platform eg sport music visual art theatre dance promote culture nonviolence peace n youth managed peer education mentoring programme promoting equality trust thoughtprovoking learning issue sgbv social inclusion violence prevention climate change sustainable development among others n activity reusing scrapped weapon artistic symbolic purpose could included reintegration activity involving community youth effort build confidence connection youth well leave lasting message peace community n small grant facility youth former member armed force group otherwise supporting youth designed implemented social programme articulated community benefit n communitydriven development facility brings youth former member armed force group otherwise together community leader identify design implement small infrastructure project benefiting community providing employment n locallevel political forum enables youth engagement local decisionmaking process provides referral service access resource n national dialogue process coordinating relevant youth actor lobby greater youth participation formal political process give youth seat table local sub national national level", "ProcessedSent": "programmatic intervention seeking promote role youth peaceful agent change might include n training programme youth former member armed force group otherwise political mediation grassroots organization advocacy", "SentID": 8627 }, { "ParagraphID": 2511, - "Paragraph": "Youth ex-combatants and youth formerly associated with armed forces and groups have the potential to play a significant, positive role in peace building. Reintegration programmes should therefore make significant resources available to promote youth as agents of change. Programmatic interventions seeking to promote the role of youth as peaceful agents of change might include: \\n a training programme for youth (former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) in political mediation, grassroots organization and advocacy. \\n a youth-led community peace education programme utilising creative platforms (e.g. sport, music, visual arts, theatre and dance) to promote a culture of non-violence and peace \\n a youth managed peer education and mentoring programme promoting equality, trust and thought-provoking learning on issues such as SGBV, social inclusion, violence prevention, climate change and sustainable development, among others. \\n an activity reusing scrapped weapons for artistic and symbolic purposes could be included as a reintegration activity involving community youth in an effort to build confidence and connections between youth, as well as leave lasting messages for peace in communities. \\n a small grants facility for youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) supporting youth designed and implemented social programmes that have an articulated community benefit. \\n a community-driven development facility that brings youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) together with community leaders to identify, design and implement small infrastructure projects benefiting the community (and providing employment). \\n a local-level political forum that enables youth to engagement in local decision-making processes and provides referral services for access to resources. \\n a national dialogue process, coordinating with other relevant youth actors, to lobby for greater youth participation in the formal political process and give youth a seat at the table at local, sub- national and national levels.", + "Paragraph": "Youth ex-combatants and youth formerly associated with armed forces and groups have the potential to play a significant, positive role in peace building. Reintegration programmes should therefore make significant resources available to promote youth as agents of change. Programmatic interventions seeking to promote the role of youth as peaceful agents of change might include: \n a training programme for youth (former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) in political mediation, grassroots organization and advocacy. \n a youth-led community peace education programme utilising creative platforms (e.g. sport, music, visual arts, theatre and dance) to promote a culture of non-violence and peace \n a youth managed peer education and mentoring programme promoting equality, trust and thought-provoking learning on issues such as SGBV, social inclusion, violence prevention, climate change and sustainable development, among others. \n an activity reusing scrapped weapons for artistic and symbolic purposes could be included as a reintegration activity involving community youth in an effort to build confidence and connections between youth, as well as leave lasting messages for peace in communities. \n a small grants facility for youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) supporting youth designed and implemented social programmes that have an articulated community benefit. \n a community-driven development facility that brings youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) together with community leaders to identify, design and implement small infrastructure projects benefiting the community (and providing employment). \n a local-level political forum that enables youth to engagement in local decision-making processes and provides referral services for access to resources. \n a national dialogue process, coordinating with other relevant youth actors, to lobby for greater youth participation in the formal political process and give youth a seat at the table at local, sub- national and national levels.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -155316,14 +155316,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Reintegration", "Heading3": "7.2.17 Voice, participation and representation", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n a youth-led community peace education programme utilising creative platforms (e.g.", + "Sentence": "\n a youth-led community peace education programme utilising creative platforms (e.g.", "newParagraph": "youth excombatants youth formerly associated armed force group potential play significant positive role peace building reintegration programme therefore make significant resource available promote youth agent change programmatic intervention seeking promote role youth peaceful agent change might include n training programme youth former member armed force group otherwise political mediation grassroots organization advocacy n youthled community peace education programme utilising creative platform eg sport music visual art theatre dance promote culture nonviolence peace n youth managed peer education mentoring programme promoting equality trust thoughtprovoking learning issue sgbv social inclusion violence prevention climate change sustainable development among others n activity reusing scrapped weapon artistic symbolic purpose could included reintegration activity involving community youth effort build confidence connection youth well leave lasting message peace community n small grant facility youth former member armed force group otherwise supporting youth designed implemented social programme articulated community benefit n communitydriven development facility brings youth former member armed force group otherwise together community leader identify design implement small infrastructure project benefiting community providing employment n locallevel political forum enables youth engagement local decisionmaking process provides referral service access resource n national dialogue process coordinating relevant youth actor lobby greater youth participation formal political process give youth seat table local sub national national level", "ProcessedSent": "n youthled community peace education programme utilising creative platform eg", "SentID": 8628 }, { "ParagraphID": 2511, - "Paragraph": "Youth ex-combatants and youth formerly associated with armed forces and groups have the potential to play a significant, positive role in peace building. Reintegration programmes should therefore make significant resources available to promote youth as agents of change. Programmatic interventions seeking to promote the role of youth as peaceful agents of change might include: \\n a training programme for youth (former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) in political mediation, grassroots organization and advocacy. \\n a youth-led community peace education programme utilising creative platforms (e.g. sport, music, visual arts, theatre and dance) to promote a culture of non-violence and peace \\n a youth managed peer education and mentoring programme promoting equality, trust and thought-provoking learning on issues such as SGBV, social inclusion, violence prevention, climate change and sustainable development, among others. \\n an activity reusing scrapped weapons for artistic and symbolic purposes could be included as a reintegration activity involving community youth in an effort to build confidence and connections between youth, as well as leave lasting messages for peace in communities. \\n a small grants facility for youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) supporting youth designed and implemented social programmes that have an articulated community benefit. \\n a community-driven development facility that brings youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) together with community leaders to identify, design and implement small infrastructure projects benefiting the community (and providing employment). \\n a local-level political forum that enables youth to engagement in local decision-making processes and provides referral services for access to resources. \\n a national dialogue process, coordinating with other relevant youth actors, to lobby for greater youth participation in the formal political process and give youth a seat at the table at local, sub- national and national levels.", + "Paragraph": "Youth ex-combatants and youth formerly associated with armed forces and groups have the potential to play a significant, positive role in peace building. Reintegration programmes should therefore make significant resources available to promote youth as agents of change. Programmatic interventions seeking to promote the role of youth as peaceful agents of change might include: \n a training programme for youth (former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) in political mediation, grassroots organization and advocacy. \n a youth-led community peace education programme utilising creative platforms (e.g. sport, music, visual arts, theatre and dance) to promote a culture of non-violence and peace \n a youth managed peer education and mentoring programme promoting equality, trust and thought-provoking learning on issues such as SGBV, social inclusion, violence prevention, climate change and sustainable development, among others. \n an activity reusing scrapped weapons for artistic and symbolic purposes could be included as a reintegration activity involving community youth in an effort to build confidence and connections between youth, as well as leave lasting messages for peace in communities. \n a small grants facility for youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) supporting youth designed and implemented social programmes that have an articulated community benefit. \n a community-driven development facility that brings youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) together with community leaders to identify, design and implement small infrastructure projects benefiting the community (and providing employment). \n a local-level political forum that enables youth to engagement in local decision-making processes and provides referral services for access to resources. \n a national dialogue process, coordinating with other relevant youth actors, to lobby for greater youth participation in the formal political process and give youth a seat at the table at local, sub- national and national levels.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -155334,14 +155334,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Reintegration", "Heading3": "7.2.17 Voice, participation and representation", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "sport, music, visual arts, theatre and dance) to promote a culture of non-violence and peace \\n a youth managed peer education and mentoring programme promoting equality, trust and thought-provoking learning on issues such as SGBV, social inclusion, violence prevention, climate change and sustainable development, among others.", + "Sentence": "sport, music, visual arts, theatre and dance) to promote a culture of non-violence and peace \n a youth managed peer education and mentoring programme promoting equality, trust and thought-provoking learning on issues such as SGBV, social inclusion, violence prevention, climate change and sustainable development, among others.", "newParagraph": "youth excombatants youth formerly associated armed force group potential play significant positive role peace building reintegration programme therefore make significant resource available promote youth agent change programmatic intervention seeking promote role youth peaceful agent change might include n training programme youth former member armed force group otherwise political mediation grassroots organization advocacy n youthled community peace education programme utilising creative platform eg sport music visual art theatre dance promote culture nonviolence peace n youth managed peer education mentoring programme promoting equality trust thoughtprovoking learning issue sgbv social inclusion violence prevention climate change sustainable development among others n activity reusing scrapped weapon artistic symbolic purpose could included reintegration activity involving community youth effort build confidence connection youth well leave lasting message peace community n small grant facility youth former member armed force group otherwise supporting youth designed implemented social programme articulated community benefit n communitydriven development facility brings youth former member armed force group otherwise together community leader identify design implement small infrastructure project benefiting community providing employment n locallevel political forum enables youth engagement local decisionmaking process provides referral service access resource n national dialogue process coordinating relevant youth actor lobby greater youth participation formal political process give youth seat table local sub national national level", "ProcessedSent": "sport music visual art theatre dance promote culture nonviolence peace n youth managed peer education mentoring programme promoting equality trust thoughtprovoking learning issue sgbv social inclusion violence prevention climate change sustainable development among others", "SentID": 8629 }, { "ParagraphID": 2511, - "Paragraph": "Youth ex-combatants and youth formerly associated with armed forces and groups have the potential to play a significant, positive role in peace building. Reintegration programmes should therefore make significant resources available to promote youth as agents of change. Programmatic interventions seeking to promote the role of youth as peaceful agents of change might include: \\n a training programme for youth (former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) in political mediation, grassroots organization and advocacy. \\n a youth-led community peace education programme utilising creative platforms (e.g. sport, music, visual arts, theatre and dance) to promote a culture of non-violence and peace \\n a youth managed peer education and mentoring programme promoting equality, trust and thought-provoking learning on issues such as SGBV, social inclusion, violence prevention, climate change and sustainable development, among others. \\n an activity reusing scrapped weapons for artistic and symbolic purposes could be included as a reintegration activity involving community youth in an effort to build confidence and connections between youth, as well as leave lasting messages for peace in communities. \\n a small grants facility for youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) supporting youth designed and implemented social programmes that have an articulated community benefit. \\n a community-driven development facility that brings youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) together with community leaders to identify, design and implement small infrastructure projects benefiting the community (and providing employment). \\n a local-level political forum that enables youth to engagement in local decision-making processes and provides referral services for access to resources. \\n a national dialogue process, coordinating with other relevant youth actors, to lobby for greater youth participation in the formal political process and give youth a seat at the table at local, sub- national and national levels.", + "Paragraph": "Youth ex-combatants and youth formerly associated with armed forces and groups have the potential to play a significant, positive role in peace building. Reintegration programmes should therefore make significant resources available to promote youth as agents of change. Programmatic interventions seeking to promote the role of youth as peaceful agents of change might include: \n a training programme for youth (former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) in political mediation, grassroots organization and advocacy. \n a youth-led community peace education programme utilising creative platforms (e.g. sport, music, visual arts, theatre and dance) to promote a culture of non-violence and peace \n a youth managed peer education and mentoring programme promoting equality, trust and thought-provoking learning on issues such as SGBV, social inclusion, violence prevention, climate change and sustainable development, among others. \n an activity reusing scrapped weapons for artistic and symbolic purposes could be included as a reintegration activity involving community youth in an effort to build confidence and connections between youth, as well as leave lasting messages for peace in communities. \n a small grants facility for youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) supporting youth designed and implemented social programmes that have an articulated community benefit. \n a community-driven development facility that brings youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) together with community leaders to identify, design and implement small infrastructure projects benefiting the community (and providing employment). \n a local-level political forum that enables youth to engagement in local decision-making processes and provides referral services for access to resources. \n a national dialogue process, coordinating with other relevant youth actors, to lobby for greater youth participation in the formal political process and give youth a seat at the table at local, sub- national and national levels.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -155352,14 +155352,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Reintegration", "Heading3": "7.2.17 Voice, participation and representation", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n an activity reusing scrapped weapons for artistic and symbolic purposes could be included as a reintegration activity involving community youth in an effort to build confidence and connections between youth, as well as leave lasting messages for peace in communities.", + "Sentence": "\n an activity reusing scrapped weapons for artistic and symbolic purposes could be included as a reintegration activity involving community youth in an effort to build confidence and connections between youth, as well as leave lasting messages for peace in communities.", "newParagraph": "youth excombatants youth formerly associated armed force group potential play significant positive role peace building reintegration programme therefore make significant resource available promote youth agent change programmatic intervention seeking promote role youth peaceful agent change might include n training programme youth former member armed force group otherwise political mediation grassroots organization advocacy n youthled community peace education programme utilising creative platform eg sport music visual art theatre dance promote culture nonviolence peace n youth managed peer education mentoring programme promoting equality trust thoughtprovoking learning issue sgbv social inclusion violence prevention climate change sustainable development among others n activity reusing scrapped weapon artistic symbolic purpose could included reintegration activity involving community youth effort build confidence connection youth well leave lasting message peace community n small grant facility youth former member armed force group otherwise supporting youth designed implemented social programme articulated community benefit n communitydriven development facility brings youth former member armed force group otherwise together community leader identify design implement small infrastructure project benefiting community providing employment n locallevel political forum enables youth engagement local decisionmaking process provides referral service access resource n national dialogue process coordinating relevant youth actor lobby greater youth participation formal political process give youth seat table local sub national national level", "ProcessedSent": "n activity reusing scrapped weapon artistic symbolic purpose could included reintegration activity involving community youth effort build confidence connection youth well leave lasting message peace community", "SentID": 8630 }, { "ParagraphID": 2511, - "Paragraph": "Youth ex-combatants and youth formerly associated with armed forces and groups have the potential to play a significant, positive role in peace building. Reintegration programmes should therefore make significant resources available to promote youth as agents of change. Programmatic interventions seeking to promote the role of youth as peaceful agents of change might include: \\n a training programme for youth (former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) in political mediation, grassroots organization and advocacy. \\n a youth-led community peace education programme utilising creative platforms (e.g. sport, music, visual arts, theatre and dance) to promote a culture of non-violence and peace \\n a youth managed peer education and mentoring programme promoting equality, trust and thought-provoking learning on issues such as SGBV, social inclusion, violence prevention, climate change and sustainable development, among others. \\n an activity reusing scrapped weapons for artistic and symbolic purposes could be included as a reintegration activity involving community youth in an effort to build confidence and connections between youth, as well as leave lasting messages for peace in communities. \\n a small grants facility for youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) supporting youth designed and implemented social programmes that have an articulated community benefit. \\n a community-driven development facility that brings youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) together with community leaders to identify, design and implement small infrastructure projects benefiting the community (and providing employment). \\n a local-level political forum that enables youth to engagement in local decision-making processes and provides referral services for access to resources. \\n a national dialogue process, coordinating with other relevant youth actors, to lobby for greater youth participation in the formal political process and give youth a seat at the table at local, sub- national and national levels.", + "Paragraph": "Youth ex-combatants and youth formerly associated with armed forces and groups have the potential to play a significant, positive role in peace building. Reintegration programmes should therefore make significant resources available to promote youth as agents of change. Programmatic interventions seeking to promote the role of youth as peaceful agents of change might include: \n a training programme for youth (former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) in political mediation, grassroots organization and advocacy. \n a youth-led community peace education programme utilising creative platforms (e.g. sport, music, visual arts, theatre and dance) to promote a culture of non-violence and peace \n a youth managed peer education and mentoring programme promoting equality, trust and thought-provoking learning on issues such as SGBV, social inclusion, violence prevention, climate change and sustainable development, among others. \n an activity reusing scrapped weapons for artistic and symbolic purposes could be included as a reintegration activity involving community youth in an effort to build confidence and connections between youth, as well as leave lasting messages for peace in communities. \n a small grants facility for youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) supporting youth designed and implemented social programmes that have an articulated community benefit. \n a community-driven development facility that brings youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) together with community leaders to identify, design and implement small infrastructure projects benefiting the community (and providing employment). \n a local-level political forum that enables youth to engagement in local decision-making processes and provides referral services for access to resources. \n a national dialogue process, coordinating with other relevant youth actors, to lobby for greater youth participation in the formal political process and give youth a seat at the table at local, sub- national and national levels.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -155370,14 +155370,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Reintegration", "Heading3": "7.2.17 Voice, participation and representation", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n a small grants facility for youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) supporting youth designed and implemented social programmes that have an articulated community benefit.", + "Sentence": "\n a small grants facility for youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) supporting youth designed and implemented social programmes that have an articulated community benefit.", "newParagraph": "youth excombatants youth formerly associated armed force group potential play significant positive role peace building reintegration programme therefore make significant resource available promote youth agent change programmatic intervention seeking promote role youth peaceful agent change might include n training programme youth former member armed force group otherwise political mediation grassroots organization advocacy n youthled community peace education programme utilising creative platform eg sport music visual art theatre dance promote culture nonviolence peace n youth managed peer education mentoring programme promoting equality trust thoughtprovoking learning issue sgbv social inclusion violence prevention climate change sustainable development among others n activity reusing scrapped weapon artistic symbolic purpose could included reintegration activity involving community youth effort build confidence connection youth well leave lasting message peace community n small grant facility youth former member armed force group otherwise supporting youth designed implemented social programme articulated community benefit n communitydriven development facility brings youth former member armed force group otherwise together community leader identify design implement small infrastructure project benefiting community providing employment n locallevel political forum enables youth engagement local decisionmaking process provides referral service access resource n national dialogue process coordinating relevant youth actor lobby greater youth participation formal political process give youth seat table local sub national national level", "ProcessedSent": "n small grant facility youth former member armed force group otherwise supporting youth designed implemented social programme articulated community benefit", "SentID": 8631 }, { "ParagraphID": 2511, - "Paragraph": "Youth ex-combatants and youth formerly associated with armed forces and groups have the potential to play a significant, positive role in peace building. Reintegration programmes should therefore make significant resources available to promote youth as agents of change. Programmatic interventions seeking to promote the role of youth as peaceful agents of change might include: \\n a training programme for youth (former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) in political mediation, grassroots organization and advocacy. \\n a youth-led community peace education programme utilising creative platforms (e.g. sport, music, visual arts, theatre and dance) to promote a culture of non-violence and peace \\n a youth managed peer education and mentoring programme promoting equality, trust and thought-provoking learning on issues such as SGBV, social inclusion, violence prevention, climate change and sustainable development, among others. \\n an activity reusing scrapped weapons for artistic and symbolic purposes could be included as a reintegration activity involving community youth in an effort to build confidence and connections between youth, as well as leave lasting messages for peace in communities. \\n a small grants facility for youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) supporting youth designed and implemented social programmes that have an articulated community benefit. \\n a community-driven development facility that brings youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) together with community leaders to identify, design and implement small infrastructure projects benefiting the community (and providing employment). \\n a local-level political forum that enables youth to engagement in local decision-making processes and provides referral services for access to resources. \\n a national dialogue process, coordinating with other relevant youth actors, to lobby for greater youth participation in the formal political process and give youth a seat at the table at local, sub- national and national levels.", + "Paragraph": "Youth ex-combatants and youth formerly associated with armed forces and groups have the potential to play a significant, positive role in peace building. Reintegration programmes should therefore make significant resources available to promote youth as agents of change. Programmatic interventions seeking to promote the role of youth as peaceful agents of change might include: \n a training programme for youth (former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) in political mediation, grassroots organization and advocacy. \n a youth-led community peace education programme utilising creative platforms (e.g. sport, music, visual arts, theatre and dance) to promote a culture of non-violence and peace \n a youth managed peer education and mentoring programme promoting equality, trust and thought-provoking learning on issues such as SGBV, social inclusion, violence prevention, climate change and sustainable development, among others. \n an activity reusing scrapped weapons for artistic and symbolic purposes could be included as a reintegration activity involving community youth in an effort to build confidence and connections between youth, as well as leave lasting messages for peace in communities. \n a small grants facility for youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) supporting youth designed and implemented social programmes that have an articulated community benefit. \n a community-driven development facility that brings youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) together with community leaders to identify, design and implement small infrastructure projects benefiting the community (and providing employment). \n a local-level political forum that enables youth to engagement in local decision-making processes and provides referral services for access to resources. \n a national dialogue process, coordinating with other relevant youth actors, to lobby for greater youth participation in the formal political process and give youth a seat at the table at local, sub- national and national levels.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -155388,14 +155388,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Reintegration", "Heading3": "7.2.17 Voice, participation and representation", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n a community-driven development facility that brings youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) together with community leaders to identify, design and implement small infrastructure projects benefiting the community (and providing employment).", + "Sentence": "\n a community-driven development facility that brings youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) together with community leaders to identify, design and implement small infrastructure projects benefiting the community (and providing employment).", "newParagraph": "youth excombatants youth formerly associated armed force group potential play significant positive role peace building reintegration programme therefore make significant resource available promote youth agent change programmatic intervention seeking promote role youth peaceful agent change might include n training programme youth former member armed force group otherwise political mediation grassroots organization advocacy n youthled community peace education programme utilising creative platform eg sport music visual art theatre dance promote culture nonviolence peace n youth managed peer education mentoring programme promoting equality trust thoughtprovoking learning issue sgbv social inclusion violence prevention climate change sustainable development among others n activity reusing scrapped weapon artistic symbolic purpose could included reintegration activity involving community youth effort build confidence connection youth well leave lasting message peace community n small grant facility youth former member armed force group otherwise supporting youth designed implemented social programme articulated community benefit n communitydriven development facility brings youth former member armed force group otherwise together community leader identify design implement small infrastructure project benefiting community providing employment n locallevel political forum enables youth engagement local decisionmaking process provides referral service access resource n national dialogue process coordinating relevant youth actor lobby greater youth participation formal political process give youth seat table local sub national national level", "ProcessedSent": "n communitydriven development facility brings youth former member armed force group otherwise together community leader identify design implement small infrastructure project benefiting community providing employment", "SentID": 8632 }, { "ParagraphID": 2511, - "Paragraph": "Youth ex-combatants and youth formerly associated with armed forces and groups have the potential to play a significant, positive role in peace building. Reintegration programmes should therefore make significant resources available to promote youth as agents of change. Programmatic interventions seeking to promote the role of youth as peaceful agents of change might include: \\n a training programme for youth (former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) in political mediation, grassroots organization and advocacy. \\n a youth-led community peace education programme utilising creative platforms (e.g. sport, music, visual arts, theatre and dance) to promote a culture of non-violence and peace \\n a youth managed peer education and mentoring programme promoting equality, trust and thought-provoking learning on issues such as SGBV, social inclusion, violence prevention, climate change and sustainable development, among others. \\n an activity reusing scrapped weapons for artistic and symbolic purposes could be included as a reintegration activity involving community youth in an effort to build confidence and connections between youth, as well as leave lasting messages for peace in communities. \\n a small grants facility for youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) supporting youth designed and implemented social programmes that have an articulated community benefit. \\n a community-driven development facility that brings youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) together with community leaders to identify, design and implement small infrastructure projects benefiting the community (and providing employment). \\n a local-level political forum that enables youth to engagement in local decision-making processes and provides referral services for access to resources. \\n a national dialogue process, coordinating with other relevant youth actors, to lobby for greater youth participation in the formal political process and give youth a seat at the table at local, sub- national and national levels.", + "Paragraph": "Youth ex-combatants and youth formerly associated with armed forces and groups have the potential to play a significant, positive role in peace building. Reintegration programmes should therefore make significant resources available to promote youth as agents of change. Programmatic interventions seeking to promote the role of youth as peaceful agents of change might include: \n a training programme for youth (former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) in political mediation, grassroots organization and advocacy. \n a youth-led community peace education programme utilising creative platforms (e.g. sport, music, visual arts, theatre and dance) to promote a culture of non-violence and peace \n a youth managed peer education and mentoring programme promoting equality, trust and thought-provoking learning on issues such as SGBV, social inclusion, violence prevention, climate change and sustainable development, among others. \n an activity reusing scrapped weapons for artistic and symbolic purposes could be included as a reintegration activity involving community youth in an effort to build confidence and connections between youth, as well as leave lasting messages for peace in communities. \n a small grants facility for youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) supporting youth designed and implemented social programmes that have an articulated community benefit. \n a community-driven development facility that brings youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) together with community leaders to identify, design and implement small infrastructure projects benefiting the community (and providing employment). \n a local-level political forum that enables youth to engagement in local decision-making processes and provides referral services for access to resources. \n a national dialogue process, coordinating with other relevant youth actors, to lobby for greater youth participation in the formal political process and give youth a seat at the table at local, sub- national and national levels.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -155406,14 +155406,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Reintegration", "Heading3": "7.2.17 Voice, participation and representation", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n a local-level political forum that enables youth to engagement in local decision-making processes and provides referral services for access to resources.", + "Sentence": "\n a local-level political forum that enables youth to engagement in local decision-making processes and provides referral services for access to resources.", "newParagraph": "youth excombatants youth formerly associated armed force group potential play significant positive role peace building reintegration programme therefore make significant resource available promote youth agent change programmatic intervention seeking promote role youth peaceful agent change might include n training programme youth former member armed force group otherwise political mediation grassroots organization advocacy n youthled community peace education programme utilising creative platform eg sport music visual art theatre dance promote culture nonviolence peace n youth managed peer education mentoring programme promoting equality trust thoughtprovoking learning issue sgbv social inclusion violence prevention climate change sustainable development among others n activity reusing scrapped weapon artistic symbolic purpose could included reintegration activity involving community youth effort build confidence connection youth well leave lasting message peace community n small grant facility youth former member armed force group otherwise supporting youth designed implemented social programme articulated community benefit n communitydriven development facility brings youth former member armed force group otherwise together community leader identify design implement small infrastructure project benefiting community providing employment n locallevel political forum enables youth engagement local decisionmaking process provides referral service access resource n national dialogue process coordinating relevant youth actor lobby greater youth participation formal political process give youth seat table local sub national national level", "ProcessedSent": "n locallevel political forum enables youth engagement local decisionmaking process provides referral service access resource", "SentID": 8633 }, { "ParagraphID": 2511, - "Paragraph": "Youth ex-combatants and youth formerly associated with armed forces and groups have the potential to play a significant, positive role in peace building. Reintegration programmes should therefore make significant resources available to promote youth as agents of change. Programmatic interventions seeking to promote the role of youth as peaceful agents of change might include: \\n a training programme for youth (former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) in political mediation, grassroots organization and advocacy. \\n a youth-led community peace education programme utilising creative platforms (e.g. sport, music, visual arts, theatre and dance) to promote a culture of non-violence and peace \\n a youth managed peer education and mentoring programme promoting equality, trust and thought-provoking learning on issues such as SGBV, social inclusion, violence prevention, climate change and sustainable development, among others. \\n an activity reusing scrapped weapons for artistic and symbolic purposes could be included as a reintegration activity involving community youth in an effort to build confidence and connections between youth, as well as leave lasting messages for peace in communities. \\n a small grants facility for youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) supporting youth designed and implemented social programmes that have an articulated community benefit. \\n a community-driven development facility that brings youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) together with community leaders to identify, design and implement small infrastructure projects benefiting the community (and providing employment). \\n a local-level political forum that enables youth to engagement in local decision-making processes and provides referral services for access to resources. \\n a national dialogue process, coordinating with other relevant youth actors, to lobby for greater youth participation in the formal political process and give youth a seat at the table at local, sub- national and national levels.", + "Paragraph": "Youth ex-combatants and youth formerly associated with armed forces and groups have the potential to play a significant, positive role in peace building. Reintegration programmes should therefore make significant resources available to promote youth as agents of change. Programmatic interventions seeking to promote the role of youth as peaceful agents of change might include: \n a training programme for youth (former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) in political mediation, grassroots organization and advocacy. \n a youth-led community peace education programme utilising creative platforms (e.g. sport, music, visual arts, theatre and dance) to promote a culture of non-violence and peace \n a youth managed peer education and mentoring programme promoting equality, trust and thought-provoking learning on issues such as SGBV, social inclusion, violence prevention, climate change and sustainable development, among others. \n an activity reusing scrapped weapons for artistic and symbolic purposes could be included as a reintegration activity involving community youth in an effort to build confidence and connections between youth, as well as leave lasting messages for peace in communities. \n a small grants facility for youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) supporting youth designed and implemented social programmes that have an articulated community benefit. \n a community-driven development facility that brings youth (both former members of armed forces and groups and otherwise) together with community leaders to identify, design and implement small infrastructure projects benefiting the community (and providing employment). \n a local-level political forum that enables youth to engagement in local decision-making processes and provides referral services for access to resources. \n a national dialogue process, coordinating with other relevant youth actors, to lobby for greater youth participation in the formal political process and give youth a seat at the table at local, sub- national and national levels.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -155424,7 +155424,7 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Reintegration", "Heading3": "7.2.17 Voice, participation and representation", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n a national dialogue process, coordinating with other relevant youth actors, to lobby for greater youth participation in the formal political process and give youth a seat at the table at local, sub- national and national levels.", + "Sentence": "\n a national dialogue process, coordinating with other relevant youth actors, to lobby for greater youth participation in the formal political process and give youth a seat at the table at local, sub- national and national levels.", "newParagraph": "youth excombatants youth formerly associated armed force group potential play significant positive role peace building reintegration programme therefore make significant resource available promote youth agent change programmatic intervention seeking promote role youth peaceful agent change might include n training programme youth former member armed force group otherwise political mediation grassroots organization advocacy n youthled community peace education programme utilising creative platform eg sport music visual art theatre dance promote culture nonviolence peace n youth managed peer education mentoring programme promoting equality trust thoughtprovoking learning issue sgbv social inclusion violence prevention climate change sustainable development among others n activity reusing scrapped weapon artistic symbolic purpose could included reintegration activity involving community youth effort build confidence connection youth well leave lasting message peace community n small grant facility youth former member armed force group otherwise supporting youth designed implemented social programme articulated community benefit n communitydriven development facility brings youth former member armed force group otherwise together community leader identify design implement small infrastructure project benefiting community providing employment n locallevel political forum enables youth engagement local decisionmaking process provides referral service access resource n national dialogue process coordinating relevant youth actor lobby greater youth participation formal political process give youth seat table local sub national national level", "ProcessedSent": "n national dialogue process coordinating relevant youth actor lobby greater youth participation formal political process give youth seat table local sub national national level", "SentID": 8634 @@ -156529,7 +156529,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2525, - "Paragraph": "\\n\\n Basic Information \\n Sex \\n Date of Birth\/Age \\n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \\n Place of Origin \\n City and Community of Reintegration \\n Marital Status \\n Number of Children and Dependants \\n Number of school aged children \\n Household Size \\n\\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \\n Do you and your family have a place to live? \\n How do you support your family financially now? \\n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \\n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \\n How much money do you earn per month on average? \\n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \\n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \\n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \\n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \\n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \\n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \\n\\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \\n What are the biggest challenges you face? \\n\\n Perceived strengths \\n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \\n\\n Support System \\n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \\n\\n Psychosocial wellbeing \\n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \\n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \\n What safety concerns do you currently have? \\n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", + "Paragraph": "\n\n Basic Information \n Sex \n Date of Birth\/Age \n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \n Place of Origin \n City and Community of Reintegration \n Marital Status \n Number of Children and Dependants \n Number of school aged children \n Household Size \n\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \n Do you and your family have a place to live? \n How do you support your family financially now? \n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \n How much money do you earn per month on average? \n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \n\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \n What are the biggest challenges you face? \n\n Perceived strengths \n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \n\n Support System \n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \n\n Psychosocial wellbeing \n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \n What safety concerns do you currently have? \n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -156540,14 +156540,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Basic Information \\n Sex \\n Date of Birth\/Age \\n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \\n Place of Origin \\n City and Community of Reintegration \\n Marital Status \\n Number of Children and Dependants \\n Number of school aged children \\n Household Size \\n\\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \\n Do you and your family have a place to live?", + "Sentence": "\n\n Basic Information \n Sex \n Date of Birth\/Age \n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \n Place of Origin \n City and Community of Reintegration \n Marital Status \n Number of Children and Dependants \n Number of school aged children \n Household Size \n\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \n Do you and your family have a place to live?", "newParagraph": "nn basic information n sex n date birthage n ethnic grouptribeclan n place origin n city community reintegration n marital status n number child dependant n number school aged child n household size nn income generationeconomic situation n family place live n support family financially n type work past n member household earn income n much money earn per month average n total earned per month working household member n last month often reduce quantity quality food eat cost n necessary able borrow money bank family friend traditional loan system n borrow money yes frequently n currently work yes source income n unemployed supportskills need find work nn perceived challengesbarriers reintegration n biggest challenge face nn perceived strength n strength professional skill nn support system n trusted person family community etc seek help talk need support person nn psychosocial wellbeing n often invited participate social activity family reunion family event wedding religious event community event n feel part community currently live n safety concern currently n frequently experience important tension conflict family since returned", "ProcessedSent": "nn basic information n sex n date birthage n ethnic grouptribeclan n place origin n city community reintegration n marital status n number child dependant n number school aged child n household size nn income generationeconomic situation n family place live", "SentID": 8696 }, { "ParagraphID": 2525, - "Paragraph": "\\n\\n Basic Information \\n Sex \\n Date of Birth\/Age \\n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \\n Place of Origin \\n City and Community of Reintegration \\n Marital Status \\n Number of Children and Dependants \\n Number of school aged children \\n Household Size \\n\\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \\n Do you and your family have a place to live? \\n How do you support your family financially now? \\n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \\n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \\n How much money do you earn per month on average? \\n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \\n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \\n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \\n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \\n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \\n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \\n\\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \\n What are the biggest challenges you face? \\n\\n Perceived strengths \\n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \\n\\n Support System \\n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \\n\\n Psychosocial wellbeing \\n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \\n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \\n What safety concerns do you currently have? \\n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", + "Paragraph": "\n\n Basic Information \n Sex \n Date of Birth\/Age \n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \n Place of Origin \n City and Community of Reintegration \n Marital Status \n Number of Children and Dependants \n Number of school aged children \n Household Size \n\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \n Do you and your family have a place to live? \n How do you support your family financially now? \n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \n How much money do you earn per month on average? \n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \n\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \n What are the biggest challenges you face? \n\n Perceived strengths \n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \n\n Support System \n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \n\n Psychosocial wellbeing \n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \n What safety concerns do you currently have? \n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -156558,14 +156558,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n How do you support your family financially now?", + "Sentence": "\n How do you support your family financially now?", "newParagraph": "nn basic information n sex n date birthage n ethnic grouptribeclan n place origin n city community reintegration n marital status n number child dependant n number school aged child n household size nn income generationeconomic situation n family place live n support family financially n type work past n member household earn income n much money earn per month average n total earned per month working household member n last month often reduce quantity quality food eat cost n necessary able borrow money bank family friend traditional loan system n borrow money yes frequently n currently work yes source income n unemployed supportskills need find work nn perceived challengesbarriers reintegration n biggest challenge face nn perceived strength n strength professional skill nn support system n trusted person family community etc seek help talk need support person nn psychosocial wellbeing n often invited participate social activity family reunion family event wedding religious event community event n feel part community currently live n safety concern currently n frequently experience important tension conflict family since returned", "ProcessedSent": "n support family financially", "SentID": 8697 }, { "ParagraphID": 2525, - "Paragraph": "\\n\\n Basic Information \\n Sex \\n Date of Birth\/Age \\n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \\n Place of Origin \\n City and Community of Reintegration \\n Marital Status \\n Number of Children and Dependants \\n Number of school aged children \\n Household Size \\n\\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \\n Do you and your family have a place to live? \\n How do you support your family financially now? \\n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \\n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \\n How much money do you earn per month on average? \\n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \\n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \\n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \\n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \\n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \\n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \\n\\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \\n What are the biggest challenges you face? \\n\\n Perceived strengths \\n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \\n\\n Support System \\n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \\n\\n Psychosocial wellbeing \\n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \\n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \\n What safety concerns do you currently have? \\n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", + "Paragraph": "\n\n Basic Information \n Sex \n Date of Birth\/Age \n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \n Place of Origin \n City and Community of Reintegration \n Marital Status \n Number of Children and Dependants \n Number of school aged children \n Household Size \n\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \n Do you and your family have a place to live? \n How do you support your family financially now? \n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \n How much money do you earn per month on average? \n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \n\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \n What are the biggest challenges you face? \n\n Perceived strengths \n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \n\n Support System \n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \n\n Psychosocial wellbeing \n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \n What safety concerns do you currently have? \n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -156576,14 +156576,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What type of work do you do now or in the past?", + "Sentence": "\n What type of work do you do now or in the past?", "newParagraph": "nn basic information n sex n date birthage n ethnic grouptribeclan n place origin n city community reintegration n marital status n number child dependant n number school aged child n household size nn income generationeconomic situation n family place live n support family financially n type work past n member household earn income n much money earn per month average n total earned per month working household member n last month often reduce quantity quality food eat cost n necessary able borrow money bank family friend traditional loan system n borrow money yes frequently n currently work yes source income n unemployed supportskills need find work nn perceived challengesbarriers reintegration n biggest challenge face nn perceived strength n strength professional skill nn support system n trusted person family community etc seek help talk need support person nn psychosocial wellbeing n often invited participate social activity family reunion family event wedding religious event community event n feel part community currently live n safety concern currently n frequently experience important tension conflict family since returned", "ProcessedSent": "n type work past", "SentID": 8698 }, { "ParagraphID": 2525, - "Paragraph": "\\n\\n Basic Information \\n Sex \\n Date of Birth\/Age \\n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \\n Place of Origin \\n City and Community of Reintegration \\n Marital Status \\n Number of Children and Dependants \\n Number of school aged children \\n Household Size \\n\\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \\n Do you and your family have a place to live? \\n How do you support your family financially now? \\n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \\n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \\n How much money do you earn per month on average? \\n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \\n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \\n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \\n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \\n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \\n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \\n\\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \\n What are the biggest challenges you face? \\n\\n Perceived strengths \\n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \\n\\n Support System \\n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \\n\\n Psychosocial wellbeing \\n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \\n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \\n What safety concerns do you currently have? \\n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", + "Paragraph": "\n\n Basic Information \n Sex \n Date of Birth\/Age \n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \n Place of Origin \n City and Community of Reintegration \n Marital Status \n Number of Children and Dependants \n Number of school aged children \n Household Size \n\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \n Do you and your family have a place to live? \n How do you support your family financially now? \n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \n How much money do you earn per month on average? \n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \n\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \n What are the biggest challenges you face? \n\n Perceived strengths \n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \n\n Support System \n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \n\n Psychosocial wellbeing \n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \n What safety concerns do you currently have? \n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -156594,14 +156594,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Do any other members of your household earn an income?", + "Sentence": "\n Do any other members of your household earn an income?", "newParagraph": "nn basic information n sex n date birthage n ethnic grouptribeclan n place origin n city community reintegration n marital status n number child dependant n number school aged child n household size nn income generationeconomic situation n family place live n support family financially n type work past n member household earn income n much money earn per month average n total earned per month working household member n last month often reduce quantity quality food eat cost n necessary able borrow money bank family friend traditional loan system n borrow money yes frequently n currently work yes source income n unemployed supportskills need find work nn perceived challengesbarriers reintegration n biggest challenge face nn perceived strength n strength professional skill nn support system n trusted person family community etc seek help talk need support person nn psychosocial wellbeing n often invited participate social activity family reunion family event wedding religious event community event n feel part community currently live n safety concern currently n frequently experience important tension conflict family since returned", "ProcessedSent": "n member household earn income", "SentID": 8699 }, { "ParagraphID": 2525, - "Paragraph": "\\n\\n Basic Information \\n Sex \\n Date of Birth\/Age \\n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \\n Place of Origin \\n City and Community of Reintegration \\n Marital Status \\n Number of Children and Dependants \\n Number of school aged children \\n Household Size \\n\\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \\n Do you and your family have a place to live? \\n How do you support your family financially now? \\n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \\n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \\n How much money do you earn per month on average? \\n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \\n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \\n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \\n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \\n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \\n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \\n\\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \\n What are the biggest challenges you face? \\n\\n Perceived strengths \\n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \\n\\n Support System \\n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \\n\\n Psychosocial wellbeing \\n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \\n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \\n What safety concerns do you currently have? \\n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", + "Paragraph": "\n\n Basic Information \n Sex \n Date of Birth\/Age \n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \n Place of Origin \n City and Community of Reintegration \n Marital Status \n Number of Children and Dependants \n Number of school aged children \n Household Size \n\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \n Do you and your family have a place to live? \n How do you support your family financially now? \n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \n How much money do you earn per month on average? \n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \n\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \n What are the biggest challenges you face? \n\n Perceived strengths \n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \n\n Support System \n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \n\n Psychosocial wellbeing \n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \n What safety concerns do you currently have? \n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -156612,14 +156612,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n How much money do you earn per month on average?", + "Sentence": "\n How much money do you earn per month on average?", "newParagraph": "nn basic information n sex n date birthage n ethnic grouptribeclan n place origin n city community reintegration n marital status n number child dependant n number school aged child n household size nn income generationeconomic situation n family place live n support family financially n type work past n member household earn income n much money earn per month average n total earned per month working household member n last month often reduce quantity quality food eat cost n necessary able borrow money bank family friend traditional loan system n borrow money yes frequently n currently work yes source income n unemployed supportskills need find work nn perceived challengesbarriers reintegration n biggest challenge face nn perceived strength n strength professional skill nn support system n trusted person family community etc seek help talk need support person nn psychosocial wellbeing n often invited participate social activity family reunion family event wedding religious event community event n feel part community currently live n safety concern currently n frequently experience important tension conflict family since returned", "ProcessedSent": "n much money earn per month average", "SentID": 8700 }, { "ParagraphID": 2525, - "Paragraph": "\\n\\n Basic Information \\n Sex \\n Date of Birth\/Age \\n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \\n Place of Origin \\n City and Community of Reintegration \\n Marital Status \\n Number of Children and Dependants \\n Number of school aged children \\n Household Size \\n\\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \\n Do you and your family have a place to live? \\n How do you support your family financially now? \\n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \\n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \\n How much money do you earn per month on average? \\n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \\n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \\n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \\n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \\n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \\n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \\n\\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \\n What are the biggest challenges you face? \\n\\n Perceived strengths \\n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \\n\\n Support System \\n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \\n\\n Psychosocial wellbeing \\n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \\n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \\n What safety concerns do you currently have? \\n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", + "Paragraph": "\n\n Basic Information \n Sex \n Date of Birth\/Age \n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \n Place of Origin \n City and Community of Reintegration \n Marital Status \n Number of Children and Dependants \n Number of school aged children \n Household Size \n\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \n Do you and your family have a place to live? \n How do you support your family financially now? \n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \n How much money do you earn per month on average? \n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \n\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \n What are the biggest challenges you face? \n\n Perceived strengths \n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \n\n Support System \n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \n\n Psychosocial wellbeing \n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \n What safety concerns do you currently have? \n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -156630,14 +156630,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What is the total earned per month of all working household members?", + "Sentence": "\n What is the total earned per month of all working household members?", "newParagraph": "nn basic information n sex n date birthage n ethnic grouptribeclan n place origin n city community reintegration n marital status n number child dependant n number school aged child n household size nn income generationeconomic situation n family place live n support family financially n type work past n member household earn income n much money earn per month average n total earned per month working household member n last month often reduce quantity quality food eat cost n necessary able borrow money bank family friend traditional loan system n borrow money yes frequently n currently work yes source income n unemployed supportskills need find work nn perceived challengesbarriers reintegration n biggest challenge face nn perceived strength n strength professional skill nn support system n trusted person family community etc seek help talk need support person nn psychosocial wellbeing n often invited participate social activity family reunion family event wedding religious event community event n feel part community currently live n safety concern currently n frequently experience important tension conflict family since returned", "ProcessedSent": "n total earned per month working household member", "SentID": 8701 }, { "ParagraphID": 2525, - "Paragraph": "\\n\\n Basic Information \\n Sex \\n Date of Birth\/Age \\n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \\n Place of Origin \\n City and Community of Reintegration \\n Marital Status \\n Number of Children and Dependants \\n Number of school aged children \\n Household Size \\n\\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \\n Do you and your family have a place to live? \\n How do you support your family financially now? \\n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \\n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \\n How much money do you earn per month on average? \\n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \\n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \\n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \\n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \\n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \\n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \\n\\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \\n What are the biggest challenges you face? \\n\\n Perceived strengths \\n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \\n\\n Support System \\n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \\n\\n Psychosocial wellbeing \\n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \\n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \\n What safety concerns do you currently have? \\n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", + "Paragraph": "\n\n Basic Information \n Sex \n Date of Birth\/Age \n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \n Place of Origin \n City and Community of Reintegration \n Marital Status \n Number of Children and Dependants \n Number of school aged children \n Household Size \n\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \n Do you and your family have a place to live? \n How do you support your family financially now? \n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \n How much money do you earn per month on average? \n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \n\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \n What are the biggest challenges you face? \n\n Perceived strengths \n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \n\n Support System \n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \n\n Psychosocial wellbeing \n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \n What safety concerns do you currently have? \n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -156648,14 +156648,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost?", + "Sentence": "\n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost?", "newParagraph": "nn basic information n sex n date birthage n ethnic grouptribeclan n place origin n city community reintegration n marital status n number child dependant n number school aged child n household size nn income generationeconomic situation n family place live n support family financially n type work past n member household earn income n much money earn per month average n total earned per month working household member n last month often reduce quantity quality food eat cost n necessary able borrow money bank family friend traditional loan system n borrow money yes frequently n currently work yes source income n unemployed supportskills need find work nn perceived challengesbarriers reintegration n biggest challenge face nn perceived strength n strength professional skill nn support system n trusted person family community etc seek help talk need support person nn psychosocial wellbeing n often invited participate social activity family reunion family event wedding religious event community event n feel part community currently live n safety concern currently n frequently experience important tension conflict family since returned", "ProcessedSent": "n last month often reduce quantity quality food eat cost", "SentID": 8702 }, { "ParagraphID": 2525, - "Paragraph": "\\n\\n Basic Information \\n Sex \\n Date of Birth\/Age \\n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \\n Place of Origin \\n City and Community of Reintegration \\n Marital Status \\n Number of Children and Dependants \\n Number of school aged children \\n Household Size \\n\\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \\n Do you and your family have a place to live? \\n How do you support your family financially now? \\n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \\n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \\n How much money do you earn per month on average? \\n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \\n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \\n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \\n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \\n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \\n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \\n\\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \\n What are the biggest challenges you face? \\n\\n Perceived strengths \\n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \\n\\n Support System \\n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \\n\\n Psychosocial wellbeing \\n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \\n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \\n What safety concerns do you currently have? \\n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", + "Paragraph": "\n\n Basic Information \n Sex \n Date of Birth\/Age \n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \n Place of Origin \n City and Community of Reintegration \n Marital Status \n Number of Children and Dependants \n Number of school aged children \n Household Size \n\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \n Do you and your family have a place to live? \n How do you support your family financially now? \n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \n How much money do you earn per month on average? \n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \n\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \n What are the biggest challenges you face? \n\n Perceived strengths \n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \n\n Support System \n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \n\n Psychosocial wellbeing \n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \n What safety concerns do you currently have? \n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -156666,14 +156666,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems?", + "Sentence": "\n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems?", "newParagraph": "nn basic information n sex n date birthage n ethnic grouptribeclan n place origin n city community reintegration n marital status n number child dependant n number school aged child n household size nn income generationeconomic situation n family place live n support family financially n type work past n member household earn income n much money earn per month average n total earned per month working household member n last month often reduce quantity quality food eat cost n necessary able borrow money bank family friend traditional loan system n borrow money yes frequently n currently work yes source income n unemployed supportskills need find work nn perceived challengesbarriers reintegration n biggest challenge face nn perceived strength n strength professional skill nn support system n trusted person family community etc seek help talk need support person nn psychosocial wellbeing n often invited participate social activity family reunion family event wedding religious event community event n feel part community currently live n safety concern currently n frequently experience important tension conflict family since returned", "ProcessedSent": "n necessary able borrow money bank family friend traditional loan system", "SentID": 8703 }, { "ParagraphID": 2525, - "Paragraph": "\\n\\n Basic Information \\n Sex \\n Date of Birth\/Age \\n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \\n Place of Origin \\n City and Community of Reintegration \\n Marital Status \\n Number of Children and Dependants \\n Number of school aged children \\n Household Size \\n\\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \\n Do you and your family have a place to live? \\n How do you support your family financially now? \\n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \\n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \\n How much money do you earn per month on average? \\n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \\n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \\n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \\n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \\n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \\n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \\n\\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \\n What are the biggest challenges you face? \\n\\n Perceived strengths \\n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \\n\\n Support System \\n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \\n\\n Psychosocial wellbeing \\n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \\n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \\n What safety concerns do you currently have? \\n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", + "Paragraph": "\n\n Basic Information \n Sex \n Date of Birth\/Age \n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \n Place of Origin \n City and Community of Reintegration \n Marital Status \n Number of Children and Dependants \n Number of school aged children \n Household Size \n\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \n Do you and your family have a place to live? \n How do you support your family financially now? \n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \n How much money do you earn per month on average? \n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \n\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \n What are the biggest challenges you face? \n\n Perceived strengths \n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \n\n Support System \n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \n\n Psychosocial wellbeing \n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \n What safety concerns do you currently have? \n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -156691,7 +156691,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2525, - "Paragraph": "\\n\\n Basic Information \\n Sex \\n Date of Birth\/Age \\n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \\n Place of Origin \\n City and Community of Reintegration \\n Marital Status \\n Number of Children and Dependants \\n Number of school aged children \\n Household Size \\n\\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \\n Do you and your family have a place to live? \\n How do you support your family financially now? \\n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \\n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \\n How much money do you earn per month on average? \\n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \\n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \\n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \\n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \\n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \\n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \\n\\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \\n What are the biggest challenges you face? \\n\\n Perceived strengths \\n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \\n\\n Support System \\n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \\n\\n Psychosocial wellbeing \\n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \\n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \\n What safety concerns do you currently have? \\n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", + "Paragraph": "\n\n Basic Information \n Sex \n Date of Birth\/Age \n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \n Place of Origin \n City and Community of Reintegration \n Marital Status \n Number of Children and Dependants \n Number of school aged children \n Household Size \n\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \n Do you and your family have a place to live? \n How do you support your family financially now? \n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \n How much money do you earn per month on average? \n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \n\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \n What are the biggest challenges you face? \n\n Perceived strengths \n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \n\n Support System \n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \n\n Psychosocial wellbeing \n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \n What safety concerns do you currently have? \n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -156702,14 +156702,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Do you borrow money?", + "Sentence": "\n Do you borrow money?", "newParagraph": "nn basic information n sex n date birthage n ethnic grouptribeclan n place origin n city community reintegration n marital status n number child dependant n number school aged child n household size nn income generationeconomic situation n family place live n support family financially n type work past n member household earn income n much money earn per month average n total earned per month working household member n last month often reduce quantity quality food eat cost n necessary able borrow money bank family friend traditional loan system n borrow money yes frequently n currently work yes source income n unemployed supportskills need find work nn perceived challengesbarriers reintegration n biggest challenge face nn perceived strength n strength professional skill nn support system n trusted person family community etc seek help talk need support person nn psychosocial wellbeing n often invited participate social activity family reunion family event wedding religious event community event n feel part community currently live n safety concern currently n frequently experience important tension conflict family since returned", "ProcessedSent": "n borrow money", "SentID": 8705 }, { "ParagraphID": 2525, - "Paragraph": "\\n\\n Basic Information \\n Sex \\n Date of Birth\/Age \\n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \\n Place of Origin \\n City and Community of Reintegration \\n Marital Status \\n Number of Children and Dependants \\n Number of school aged children \\n Household Size \\n\\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \\n Do you and your family have a place to live? \\n How do you support your family financially now? \\n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \\n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \\n How much money do you earn per month on average? \\n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \\n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \\n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \\n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \\n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \\n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \\n\\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \\n What are the biggest challenges you face? \\n\\n Perceived strengths \\n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \\n\\n Support System \\n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \\n\\n Psychosocial wellbeing \\n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \\n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \\n What safety concerns do you currently have? \\n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", + "Paragraph": "\n\n Basic Information \n Sex \n Date of Birth\/Age \n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \n Place of Origin \n City and Community of Reintegration \n Marital Status \n Number of Children and Dependants \n Number of school aged children \n Household Size \n\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \n Do you and your family have a place to live? \n How do you support your family financially now? \n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \n How much money do you earn per month on average? \n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \n\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \n What are the biggest challenges you face? \n\n Perceived strengths \n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \n\n Support System \n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \n\n Psychosocial wellbeing \n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \n What safety concerns do you currently have? \n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -156727,7 +156727,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2525, - "Paragraph": "\\n\\n Basic Information \\n Sex \\n Date of Birth\/Age \\n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \\n Place of Origin \\n City and Community of Reintegration \\n Marital Status \\n Number of Children and Dependants \\n Number of school aged children \\n Household Size \\n\\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \\n Do you and your family have a place to live? \\n How do you support your family financially now? \\n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \\n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \\n How much money do you earn per month on average? \\n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \\n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \\n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \\n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \\n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \\n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \\n\\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \\n What are the biggest challenges you face? \\n\\n Perceived strengths \\n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \\n\\n Support System \\n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \\n\\n Psychosocial wellbeing \\n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \\n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \\n What safety concerns do you currently have? \\n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", + "Paragraph": "\n\n Basic Information \n Sex \n Date of Birth\/Age \n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \n Place of Origin \n City and Community of Reintegration \n Marital Status \n Number of Children and Dependants \n Number of school aged children \n Household Size \n\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \n Do you and your family have a place to live? \n How do you support your family financially now? \n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \n How much money do you earn per month on average? \n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \n\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \n What are the biggest challenges you face? \n\n Perceived strengths \n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \n\n Support System \n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \n\n Psychosocial wellbeing \n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \n What safety concerns do you currently have? \n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -156738,14 +156738,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Do you currently work?", + "Sentence": "\n Do you currently work?", "newParagraph": "nn basic information n sex n date birthage n ethnic grouptribeclan n place origin n city community reintegration n marital status n number child dependant n number school aged child n household size nn income generationeconomic situation n family place live n support family financially n type work past n member household earn income n much money earn per month average n total earned per month working household member n last month often reduce quantity quality food eat cost n necessary able borrow money bank family friend traditional loan system n borrow money yes frequently n currently work yes source income n unemployed supportskills need find work nn perceived challengesbarriers reintegration n biggest challenge face nn perceived strength n strength professional skill nn support system n trusted person family community etc seek help talk need support person nn psychosocial wellbeing n often invited participate social activity family reunion family event wedding religious event community event n feel part community currently live n safety concern currently n frequently experience important tension conflict family since returned", "ProcessedSent": "n currently work", "SentID": 8707 }, { "ParagraphID": 2525, - "Paragraph": "\\n\\n Basic Information \\n Sex \\n Date of Birth\/Age \\n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \\n Place of Origin \\n City and Community of Reintegration \\n Marital Status \\n Number of Children and Dependants \\n Number of school aged children \\n Household Size \\n\\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \\n Do you and your family have a place to live? \\n How do you support your family financially now? \\n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \\n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \\n How much money do you earn per month on average? \\n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \\n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \\n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \\n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \\n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \\n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \\n\\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \\n What are the biggest challenges you face? \\n\\n Perceived strengths \\n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \\n\\n Support System \\n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \\n\\n Psychosocial wellbeing \\n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \\n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \\n What safety concerns do you currently have? \\n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", + "Paragraph": "\n\n Basic Information \n Sex \n Date of Birth\/Age \n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \n Place of Origin \n City and Community of Reintegration \n Marital Status \n Number of Children and Dependants \n Number of school aged children \n Household Size \n\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \n Do you and your family have a place to live? \n How do you support your family financially now? \n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \n How much money do you earn per month on average? \n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \n\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \n What are the biggest challenges you face? \n\n Perceived strengths \n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \n\n Support System \n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \n\n Psychosocial wellbeing \n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \n What safety concerns do you currently have? \n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -156763,7 +156763,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2525, - "Paragraph": "\\n\\n Basic Information \\n Sex \\n Date of Birth\/Age \\n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \\n Place of Origin \\n City and Community of Reintegration \\n Marital Status \\n Number of Children and Dependants \\n Number of school aged children \\n Household Size \\n\\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \\n Do you and your family have a place to live? \\n How do you support your family financially now? \\n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \\n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \\n How much money do you earn per month on average? \\n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \\n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \\n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \\n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \\n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \\n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \\n\\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \\n What are the biggest challenges you face? \\n\\n Perceived strengths \\n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \\n\\n Support System \\n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \\n\\n Psychosocial wellbeing \\n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \\n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \\n What safety concerns do you currently have? \\n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", + "Paragraph": "\n\n Basic Information \n Sex \n Date of Birth\/Age \n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \n Place of Origin \n City and Community of Reintegration \n Marital Status \n Number of Children and Dependants \n Number of school aged children \n Household Size \n\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \n Do you and your family have a place to live? \n How do you support your family financially now? \n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \n How much money do you earn per month on average? \n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \n\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \n What are the biggest challenges you face? \n\n Perceived strengths \n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \n\n Support System \n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \n\n Psychosocial wellbeing \n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \n What safety concerns do you currently have? \n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -156774,14 +156774,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work?", + "Sentence": "\n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work?", "newParagraph": "nn basic information n sex n date birthage n ethnic grouptribeclan n place origin n city community reintegration n marital status n number child dependant n number school aged child n household size nn income generationeconomic situation n family place live n support family financially n type work past n member household earn income n much money earn per month average n total earned per month working household member n last month often reduce quantity quality food eat cost n necessary able borrow money bank family friend traditional loan system n borrow money yes frequently n currently work yes source income n unemployed supportskills need find work nn perceived challengesbarriers reintegration n biggest challenge face nn perceived strength n strength professional skill nn support system n trusted person family community etc seek help talk need support person nn psychosocial wellbeing n often invited participate social activity family reunion family event wedding religious event community event n feel part community currently live n safety concern currently n frequently experience important tension conflict family since returned", "ProcessedSent": "n unemployed supportskills need find work", "SentID": 8709 }, { "ParagraphID": 2525, - "Paragraph": "\\n\\n Basic Information \\n Sex \\n Date of Birth\/Age \\n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \\n Place of Origin \\n City and Community of Reintegration \\n Marital Status \\n Number of Children and Dependants \\n Number of school aged children \\n Household Size \\n\\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \\n Do you and your family have a place to live? \\n How do you support your family financially now? \\n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \\n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \\n How much money do you earn per month on average? \\n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \\n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \\n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \\n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \\n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \\n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \\n\\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \\n What are the biggest challenges you face? \\n\\n Perceived strengths \\n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \\n\\n Support System \\n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \\n\\n Psychosocial wellbeing \\n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \\n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \\n What safety concerns do you currently have? \\n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", + "Paragraph": "\n\n Basic Information \n Sex \n Date of Birth\/Age \n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \n Place of Origin \n City and Community of Reintegration \n Marital Status \n Number of Children and Dependants \n Number of school aged children \n Household Size \n\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \n Do you and your family have a place to live? \n How do you support your family financially now? \n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \n How much money do you earn per month on average? \n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \n\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \n What are the biggest challenges you face? \n\n Perceived strengths \n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \n\n Support System \n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \n\n Psychosocial wellbeing \n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \n What safety concerns do you currently have? \n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -156792,14 +156792,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \\n What are the biggest challenges you face?", + "Sentence": "\n\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \n What are the biggest challenges you face?", "newParagraph": "nn basic information n sex n date birthage n ethnic grouptribeclan n place origin n city community reintegration n marital status n number child dependant n number school aged child n household size nn income generationeconomic situation n family place live n support family financially n type work past n member household earn income n much money earn per month average n total earned per month working household member n last month often reduce quantity quality food eat cost n necessary able borrow money bank family friend traditional loan system n borrow money yes frequently n currently work yes source income n unemployed supportskills need find work nn perceived challengesbarriers reintegration n biggest challenge face nn perceived strength n strength professional skill nn support system n trusted person family community etc seek help talk need support person nn psychosocial wellbeing n often invited participate social activity family reunion family event wedding religious event community event n feel part community currently live n safety concern currently n frequently experience important tension conflict family since returned", "ProcessedSent": "nn perceived challengesbarriers reintegration n biggest challenge face", "SentID": 8710 }, { "ParagraphID": 2525, - "Paragraph": "\\n\\n Basic Information \\n Sex \\n Date of Birth\/Age \\n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \\n Place of Origin \\n City and Community of Reintegration \\n Marital Status \\n Number of Children and Dependants \\n Number of school aged children \\n Household Size \\n\\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \\n Do you and your family have a place to live? \\n How do you support your family financially now? \\n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \\n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \\n How much money do you earn per month on average? \\n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \\n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \\n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \\n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \\n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \\n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \\n\\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \\n What are the biggest challenges you face? \\n\\n Perceived strengths \\n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \\n\\n Support System \\n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \\n\\n Psychosocial wellbeing \\n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \\n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \\n What safety concerns do you currently have? \\n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", + "Paragraph": "\n\n Basic Information \n Sex \n Date of Birth\/Age \n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \n Place of Origin \n City and Community of Reintegration \n Marital Status \n Number of Children and Dependants \n Number of school aged children \n Household Size \n\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \n Do you and your family have a place to live? \n How do you support your family financially now? \n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \n How much money do you earn per month on average? \n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \n\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \n What are the biggest challenges you face? \n\n Perceived strengths \n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \n\n Support System \n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \n\n Psychosocial wellbeing \n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \n What safety concerns do you currently have? \n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -156810,14 +156810,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Perceived strengths \\n What are your strengths?", + "Sentence": "\n\n Perceived strengths \n What are your strengths?", "newParagraph": "nn basic information n sex n date birthage n ethnic grouptribeclan n place origin n city community reintegration n marital status n number child dependant n number school aged child n household size nn income generationeconomic situation n family place live n support family financially n type work past n member household earn income n much money earn per month average n total earned per month working household member n last month often reduce quantity quality food eat cost n necessary able borrow money bank family friend traditional loan system n borrow money yes frequently n currently work yes source income n unemployed supportskills need find work nn perceived challengesbarriers reintegration n biggest challenge face nn perceived strength n strength professional skill nn support system n trusted person family community etc seek help talk need support person nn psychosocial wellbeing n often invited participate social activity family reunion family event wedding religious event community event n feel part community currently live n safety concern currently n frequently experience important tension conflict family since returned", "ProcessedSent": "nn perceived strength n strength", "SentID": 8711 }, { "ParagraphID": 2525, - "Paragraph": "\\n\\n Basic Information \\n Sex \\n Date of Birth\/Age \\n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \\n Place of Origin \\n City and Community of Reintegration \\n Marital Status \\n Number of Children and Dependants \\n Number of school aged children \\n Household Size \\n\\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \\n Do you and your family have a place to live? \\n How do you support your family financially now? \\n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \\n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \\n How much money do you earn per month on average? \\n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \\n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \\n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \\n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \\n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \\n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \\n\\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \\n What are the biggest challenges you face? \\n\\n Perceived strengths \\n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \\n\\n Support System \\n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \\n\\n Psychosocial wellbeing \\n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \\n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \\n What safety concerns do you currently have? \\n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", + "Paragraph": "\n\n Basic Information \n Sex \n Date of Birth\/Age \n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \n Place of Origin \n City and Community of Reintegration \n Marital Status \n Number of Children and Dependants \n Number of school aged children \n Household Size \n\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \n Do you and your family have a place to live? \n How do you support your family financially now? \n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \n How much money do you earn per month on average? \n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \n\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \n What are the biggest challenges you face? \n\n Perceived strengths \n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \n\n Support System \n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \n\n Psychosocial wellbeing \n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \n What safety concerns do you currently have? \n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -156835,7 +156835,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2525, - "Paragraph": "\\n\\n Basic Information \\n Sex \\n Date of Birth\/Age \\n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \\n Place of Origin \\n City and Community of Reintegration \\n Marital Status \\n Number of Children and Dependants \\n Number of school aged children \\n Household Size \\n\\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \\n Do you and your family have a place to live? \\n How do you support your family financially now? \\n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \\n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \\n How much money do you earn per month on average? \\n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \\n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \\n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \\n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \\n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \\n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \\n\\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \\n What are the biggest challenges you face? \\n\\n Perceived strengths \\n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \\n\\n Support System \\n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \\n\\n Psychosocial wellbeing \\n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \\n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \\n What safety concerns do you currently have? \\n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", + "Paragraph": "\n\n Basic Information \n Sex \n Date of Birth\/Age \n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \n Place of Origin \n City and Community of Reintegration \n Marital Status \n Number of Children and Dependants \n Number of school aged children \n Household Size \n\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \n Do you and your family have a place to live? \n How do you support your family financially now? \n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \n How much money do you earn per month on average? \n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \n\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \n What are the biggest challenges you face? \n\n Perceived strengths \n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \n\n Support System \n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \n\n Psychosocial wellbeing \n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \n What safety concerns do you currently have? \n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -156846,14 +156846,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Support System \\n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.)", + "Sentence": "\n\n Support System \n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.)", "newParagraph": "nn basic information n sex n date birthage n ethnic grouptribeclan n place origin n city community reintegration n marital status n number child dependant n number school aged child n household size nn income generationeconomic situation n family place live n support family financially n type work past n member household earn income n much money earn per month average n total earned per month working household member n last month often reduce quantity quality food eat cost n necessary able borrow money bank family friend traditional loan system n borrow money yes frequently n currently work yes source income n unemployed supportskills need find work nn perceived challengesbarriers reintegration n biggest challenge face nn perceived strength n strength professional skill nn support system n trusted person family community etc seek help talk need support person nn psychosocial wellbeing n often invited participate social activity family reunion family event wedding religious event community event n feel part community currently live n safety concern currently n frequently experience important tension conflict family since returned", "ProcessedSent": "nn support system n trusted person family community etc", "SentID": 8713 }, { "ParagraphID": 2525, - "Paragraph": "\\n\\n Basic Information \\n Sex \\n Date of Birth\/Age \\n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \\n Place of Origin \\n City and Community of Reintegration \\n Marital Status \\n Number of Children and Dependants \\n Number of school aged children \\n Household Size \\n\\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \\n Do you and your family have a place to live? \\n How do you support your family financially now? \\n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \\n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \\n How much money do you earn per month on average? \\n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \\n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \\n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \\n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \\n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \\n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \\n\\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \\n What are the biggest challenges you face? \\n\\n Perceived strengths \\n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \\n\\n Support System \\n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \\n\\n Psychosocial wellbeing \\n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \\n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \\n What safety concerns do you currently have? \\n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", + "Paragraph": "\n\n Basic Information \n Sex \n Date of Birth\/Age \n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \n Place of Origin \n City and Community of Reintegration \n Marital Status \n Number of Children and Dependants \n Number of school aged children \n Household Size \n\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \n Do you and your family have a place to live? \n How do you support your family financially now? \n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \n How much money do you earn per month on average? \n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \n\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \n What are the biggest challenges you face? \n\n Perceived strengths \n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \n\n Support System \n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \n\n Psychosocial wellbeing \n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \n What safety concerns do you currently have? \n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -156871,7 +156871,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2525, - "Paragraph": "\\n\\n Basic Information \\n Sex \\n Date of Birth\/Age \\n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \\n Place of Origin \\n City and Community of Reintegration \\n Marital Status \\n Number of Children and Dependants \\n Number of school aged children \\n Household Size \\n\\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \\n Do you and your family have a place to live? \\n How do you support your family financially now? \\n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \\n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \\n How much money do you earn per month on average? \\n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \\n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \\n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \\n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \\n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \\n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \\n\\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \\n What are the biggest challenges you face? \\n\\n Perceived strengths \\n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \\n\\n Support System \\n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \\n\\n Psychosocial wellbeing \\n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \\n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \\n What safety concerns do you currently have? \\n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", + "Paragraph": "\n\n Basic Information \n Sex \n Date of Birth\/Age \n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \n Place of Origin \n City and Community of Reintegration \n Marital Status \n Number of Children and Dependants \n Number of school aged children \n Household Size \n\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \n Do you and your family have a place to live? \n How do you support your family financially now? \n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \n How much money do you earn per month on average? \n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \n\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \n What are the biggest challenges you face? \n\n Perceived strengths \n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \n\n Support System \n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \n\n Psychosocial wellbeing \n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \n What safety concerns do you currently have? \n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -156889,7 +156889,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2525, - "Paragraph": "\\n\\n Basic Information \\n Sex \\n Date of Birth\/Age \\n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \\n Place of Origin \\n City and Community of Reintegration \\n Marital Status \\n Number of Children and Dependants \\n Number of school aged children \\n Household Size \\n\\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \\n Do you and your family have a place to live? \\n How do you support your family financially now? \\n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \\n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \\n How much money do you earn per month on average? \\n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \\n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \\n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \\n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \\n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \\n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \\n\\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \\n What are the biggest challenges you face? \\n\\n Perceived strengths \\n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \\n\\n Support System \\n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \\n\\n Psychosocial wellbeing \\n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \\n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \\n What safety concerns do you currently have? \\n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", + "Paragraph": "\n\n Basic Information \n Sex \n Date of Birth\/Age \n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \n Place of Origin \n City and Community of Reintegration \n Marital Status \n Number of Children and Dependants \n Number of school aged children \n Household Size \n\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \n Do you and your family have a place to live? \n How do you support your family financially now? \n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \n How much money do you earn per month on average? \n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \n\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \n What are the biggest challenges you face? \n\n Perceived strengths \n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \n\n Support System \n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \n\n Psychosocial wellbeing \n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \n What safety concerns do you currently have? \n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -156900,14 +156900,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Psychosocial wellbeing \\n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)?", + "Sentence": "\n\n Psychosocial wellbeing \n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)?", "newParagraph": "nn basic information n sex n date birthage n ethnic grouptribeclan n place origin n city community reintegration n marital status n number child dependant n number school aged child n household size nn income generationeconomic situation n family place live n support family financially n type work past n member household earn income n much money earn per month average n total earned per month working household member n last month often reduce quantity quality food eat cost n necessary able borrow money bank family friend traditional loan system n borrow money yes frequently n currently work yes source income n unemployed supportskills need find work nn perceived challengesbarriers reintegration n biggest challenge face nn perceived strength n strength professional skill nn support system n trusted person family community etc seek help talk need support person nn psychosocial wellbeing n often invited participate social activity family reunion family event wedding religious event community event n feel part community currently live n safety concern currently n frequently experience important tension conflict family since returned", "ProcessedSent": "nn psychosocial wellbeing n often invited participate social activity family reunion family event wedding religious event community event", "SentID": 8716 }, { "ParagraphID": 2525, - "Paragraph": "\\n\\n Basic Information \\n Sex \\n Date of Birth\/Age \\n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \\n Place of Origin \\n City and Community of Reintegration \\n Marital Status \\n Number of Children and Dependants \\n Number of school aged children \\n Household Size \\n\\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \\n Do you and your family have a place to live? \\n How do you support your family financially now? \\n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \\n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \\n How much money do you earn per month on average? \\n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \\n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \\n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \\n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \\n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \\n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \\n\\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \\n What are the biggest challenges you face? \\n\\n Perceived strengths \\n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \\n\\n Support System \\n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \\n\\n Psychosocial wellbeing \\n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \\n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \\n What safety concerns do you currently have? \\n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", + "Paragraph": "\n\n Basic Information \n Sex \n Date of Birth\/Age \n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \n Place of Origin \n City and Community of Reintegration \n Marital Status \n Number of Children and Dependants \n Number of school aged children \n Household Size \n\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \n Do you and your family have a place to live? \n How do you support your family financially now? \n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \n How much money do you earn per month on average? \n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \n\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \n What are the biggest challenges you face? \n\n Perceived strengths \n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \n\n Support System \n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \n\n Psychosocial wellbeing \n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \n What safety concerns do you currently have? \n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -156918,14 +156918,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live?", + "Sentence": "\n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live?", "newParagraph": "nn basic information n sex n date birthage n ethnic grouptribeclan n place origin n city community reintegration n marital status n number child dependant n number school aged child n household size nn income generationeconomic situation n family place live n support family financially n type work past n member household earn income n much money earn per month average n total earned per month working household member n last month often reduce quantity quality food eat cost n necessary able borrow money bank family friend traditional loan system n borrow money yes frequently n currently work yes source income n unemployed supportskills need find work nn perceived challengesbarriers reintegration n biggest challenge face nn perceived strength n strength professional skill nn support system n trusted person family community etc seek help talk need support person nn psychosocial wellbeing n often invited participate social activity family reunion family event wedding religious event community event n feel part community currently live n safety concern currently n frequently experience important tension conflict family since returned", "ProcessedSent": "n feel part community currently live", "SentID": 8717 }, { "ParagraphID": 2525, - "Paragraph": "\\n\\n Basic Information \\n Sex \\n Date of Birth\/Age \\n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \\n Place of Origin \\n City and Community of Reintegration \\n Marital Status \\n Number of Children and Dependants \\n Number of school aged children \\n Household Size \\n\\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \\n Do you and your family have a place to live? \\n How do you support your family financially now? \\n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \\n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \\n How much money do you earn per month on average? \\n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \\n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \\n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \\n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \\n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \\n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \\n\\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \\n What are the biggest challenges you face? \\n\\n Perceived strengths \\n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \\n\\n Support System \\n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \\n\\n Psychosocial wellbeing \\n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \\n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \\n What safety concerns do you currently have? \\n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", + "Paragraph": "\n\n Basic Information \n Sex \n Date of Birth\/Age \n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \n Place of Origin \n City and Community of Reintegration \n Marital Status \n Number of Children and Dependants \n Number of school aged children \n Household Size \n\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \n Do you and your family have a place to live? \n How do you support your family financially now? \n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \n How much money do you earn per month on average? \n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \n\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \n What are the biggest challenges you face? \n\n Perceived strengths \n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \n\n Support System \n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \n\n Psychosocial wellbeing \n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \n What safety concerns do you currently have? \n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -156936,14 +156936,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What safety concerns do you currently have?", + "Sentence": "\n What safety concerns do you currently have?", "newParagraph": "nn basic information n sex n date birthage n ethnic grouptribeclan n place origin n city community reintegration n marital status n number child dependant n number school aged child n household size nn income generationeconomic situation n family place live n support family financially n type work past n member household earn income n much money earn per month average n total earned per month working household member n last month often reduce quantity quality food eat cost n necessary able borrow money bank family friend traditional loan system n borrow money yes frequently n currently work yes source income n unemployed supportskills need find work nn perceived challengesbarriers reintegration n biggest challenge face nn perceived strength n strength professional skill nn support system n trusted person family community etc seek help talk need support person nn psychosocial wellbeing n often invited participate social activity family reunion family event wedding religious event community event n feel part community currently live n safety concern currently n frequently experience important tension conflict family since returned", "ProcessedSent": "n safety concern currently", "SentID": 8718 }, { "ParagraphID": 2525, - "Paragraph": "\\n\\n Basic Information \\n Sex \\n Date of Birth\/Age \\n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \\n Place of Origin \\n City and Community of Reintegration \\n Marital Status \\n Number of Children and Dependants \\n Number of school aged children \\n Household Size \\n\\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \\n Do you and your family have a place to live? \\n How do you support your family financially now? \\n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \\n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \\n How much money do you earn per month on average? \\n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \\n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \\n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \\n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \\n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \\n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \\n\\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \\n What are the biggest challenges you face? \\n\\n Perceived strengths \\n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \\n\\n Support System \\n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \\n\\n Psychosocial wellbeing \\n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \\n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \\n What safety concerns do you currently have? \\n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", + "Paragraph": "\n\n Basic Information \n Sex \n Date of Birth\/Age \n Ethnic Group\/Tribe\/Clan \n Place of Origin \n City and Community of Reintegration \n Marital Status \n Number of Children and Dependants \n Number of school aged children \n Household Size \n\n Income Generation\/Economic Situation \n Do you and your family have a place to live? \n How do you support your family financially now? \n What type of work do you do now or in the past? \n Do any other members of your household earn an income? \n How much money do you earn per month on average? \n What is the total earned per month of all working household members? \n Over the last few months, how often have you had to reduce the quantity or quality of food you eat because of its cost? \n If necessary, are you able to borrow money from banks, family, friends or other traditional loans systems? If not, why? \n Do you borrow money? If yes, how frequently? \n Do you currently work? If yes, what are your sources of income? \n If you are unemployed, what support\/skills do you need to find work? \n\n Perceived Challenges\/Barriers to Reintegration \n What are the biggest challenges you face? \n\n Perceived strengths \n What are your strengths? What professional skills do you have? \n\n Support System \n Do you have any trusted persons (from your family, community, etc.) that you can seek help from or talk to if you need support? Who are these persons? \n\n Psychosocial wellbeing \n How often are you invited to participate in social activities (family reunions, family events, weddings, religious events, community events)? \n Do you feel you are part of the community where you currently live? \n What safety concerns do you currently have? \n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -156954,7 +156954,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", + "Sentence": "\n How frequently do you experience important tensions or conflicts between you and your family since you returned?", "newParagraph": "nn basic information n sex n date birthage n ethnic grouptribeclan n place origin n city community reintegration n marital status n number child dependant n number school aged child n household size nn income generationeconomic situation n family place live n support family financially n type work past n member household earn income n much money earn per month average n total earned per month working household member n last month often reduce quantity quality food eat cost n necessary able borrow money bank family friend traditional loan system n borrow money yes frequently n currently work yes source income n unemployed supportskills need find work nn perceived challengesbarriers reintegration n biggest challenge face nn perceived strength n strength professional skill nn support system n trusted person family community etc seek help talk need support person nn psychosocial wellbeing n often invited participate social activity family reunion family event wedding religious event community event n feel part community currently live n safety concern currently n frequently experience important tension conflict family since returned", "ProcessedSent": "n frequently experience important tension conflict family since returned", "SentID": 8719 @@ -157069,7 +157069,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2528, - "Paragraph": "This module attempts to answer the following questions: \\n What are the population groups connected with combatants moving across interna\u00ad tional borders? \\n What are the standards and legal frameworks governing their treatment? What are recommendations for action on both sides of the border? \\n What are the roles and responsibilities of international and national agencies on both sides of the border?", + "Paragraph": "This module attempts to answer the following questions: \n What are the population groups connected with combatants moving across interna\u00ad tional borders? \n What are the standards and legal frameworks governing their treatment? What are recommendations for action on both sides of the border? \n What are the roles and responsibilities of international and national agencies on both sides of the border?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -157080,14 +157080,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This module attempts to answer the following questions: \\n What are the population groups connected with combatants moving across interna\u00ad tional borders?", + "Sentence": "This module attempts to answer the following questions: \n What are the population groups connected with combatants moving across interna\u00ad tional borders?", "newParagraph": "module attempt answer following question n population group connected combatant moving across interna tional border n standard legal framework governing treatment recommendation action side border n role responsibility international national agency side border", "ProcessedSent": "module attempt answer following question n population group connected combatant moving across interna tional border", "SentID": 8726 }, { "ParagraphID": 2528, - "Paragraph": "This module attempts to answer the following questions: \\n What are the population groups connected with combatants moving across interna\u00ad tional borders? \\n What are the standards and legal frameworks governing their treatment? What are recommendations for action on both sides of the border? \\n What are the roles and responsibilities of international and national agencies on both sides of the border?", + "Paragraph": "This module attempts to answer the following questions: \n What are the population groups connected with combatants moving across interna\u00ad tional borders? \n What are the standards and legal frameworks governing their treatment? What are recommendations for action on both sides of the border? \n What are the roles and responsibilities of international and national agencies on both sides of the border?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -157098,14 +157098,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are the standards and legal frameworks governing their treatment?", + "Sentence": "\n What are the standards and legal frameworks governing their treatment?", "newParagraph": "module attempt answer following question n population group connected combatant moving across interna tional border n standard legal framework governing treatment recommendation action side border n role responsibility international national agency side border", "ProcessedSent": "n standard legal framework governing treatment", "SentID": 8727 }, { "ParagraphID": 2528, - "Paragraph": "This module attempts to answer the following questions: \\n What are the population groups connected with combatants moving across interna\u00ad tional borders? \\n What are the standards and legal frameworks governing their treatment? What are recommendations for action on both sides of the border? \\n What are the roles and responsibilities of international and national agencies on both sides of the border?", + "Paragraph": "This module attempts to answer the following questions: \n What are the population groups connected with combatants moving across interna\u00ad tional borders? \n What are the standards and legal frameworks governing their treatment? What are recommendations for action on both sides of the border? \n What are the roles and responsibilities of international and national agencies on both sides of the border?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -157123,7 +157123,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2528, - "Paragraph": "This module attempts to answer the following questions: \\n What are the population groups connected with combatants moving across interna\u00ad tional borders? \\n What are the standards and legal frameworks governing their treatment? What are recommendations for action on both sides of the border? \\n What are the roles and responsibilities of international and national agencies on both sides of the border?", + "Paragraph": "This module attempts to answer the following questions: \n What are the population groups connected with combatants moving across interna\u00ad tional borders? \n What are the standards and legal frameworks governing their treatment? What are recommendations for action on both sides of the border? \n What are the roles and responsibilities of international and national agencies on both sides of the border?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -157134,7 +157134,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are the roles and responsibilities of international and national agencies on both sides of the border?", + "Sentence": "\n What are the roles and responsibilities of international and national agencies on both sides of the border?", "newParagraph": "module attempt answer following question n population group connected combatant moving across interna tional border n standard legal framework governing treatment recommendation action side border n role responsibility international national agency side border", "ProcessedSent": "n role responsibility international national agency side border", "SentID": 8729 @@ -157249,7 +157249,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2533, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -157267,7 +157267,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2533, - "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -157278,7 +157278,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "newParagraph": "iddrs series word shall may must used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "ProcessedSent": "use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "SentID": 8737 @@ -158563,7 +158563,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2562, - "Paragraph": "A refugee is defined in the 1951 UN Convention and 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees as a person who: \\n is outside his\/her country of origin; \\n has a well\u00adfounded fear of persecution because of race, religion, nationality, member\u00ad ship of a particular social group or political opinion; \\n is unable or unwilling to avail him\u00ad\/herself of the protection of that country, or to return there, owing to the well\u00adfounded fear of persecution.", + "Paragraph": "A refugee is defined in the 1951 UN Convention and 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees as a person who: \n is outside his\/her country of origin; \n has a well\u00adfounded fear of persecution because of race, religion, nationality, member\u00ad ship of a particular social group or political opinion; \n is unable or unwilling to avail him\u00ad\/herself of the protection of that country, or to return there, owing to the well\u00adfounded fear of persecution.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -158574,7 +158574,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.5. Refugee law", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "A refugee is defined in the 1951 UN Convention and 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees as a person who: \\n is outside his\/her country of origin; \\n has a well\u00adfounded fear of persecution because of race, religion, nationality, member\u00ad ship of a particular social group or political opinion; \\n is unable or unwilling to avail him\u00ad\/herself of the protection of that country, or to return there, owing to the well\u00adfounded fear of persecution.", + "Sentence": "A refugee is defined in the 1951 UN Convention and 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees as a person who: \n is outside his\/her country of origin; \n has a well\u00adfounded fear of persecution because of race, religion, nationality, member\u00ad ship of a particular social group or political opinion; \n is unable or unwilling to avail him\u00ad\/herself of the protection of that country, or to return there, owing to the well\u00adfounded fear of persecution.", "newParagraph": "refugee defined 1951 un convention 1967 protocol relating status refugee person n outside hisher country origin n well founded fear persecution race religion nationality member ship particular social group political opinion n unable unwilling avail protection country return owing well founded fear persecution", "ProcessedSent": "refugee defined 1951 un convention 1967 protocol relating status refugee person n outside hisher country origin n well founded fear persecution race religion nationality member ship particular social group political opinion n unable unwilling avail protection country return owing well founded fear persecution", "SentID": 8809 @@ -158923,7 +158923,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2568, - "Paragraph": "The UNHCR Executive Committee has formulated a number of conclusions, providing guidance for protection during mixed population movements. Conclusion 94 on preserving the humanitarian and civilian character of asylum is attached as Annex C. It recommends, among other things, that States receiving influxes of refugees and combatants should take measures as early as possible to: \\n disarm armed elements; \\n identify and separate combatants from the refugee population; \\n intern combatants.", + "Paragraph": "The UNHCR Executive Committee has formulated a number of conclusions, providing guidance for protection during mixed population movements. Conclusion 94 on preserving the humanitarian and civilian character of asylum is attached as Annex C. It recommends, among other things, that States receiving influxes of refugees and combatants should take measures as early as possible to: \n disarm armed elements; \n identify and separate combatants from the refugee population; \n intern combatants.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -158941,7 +158941,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2568, - "Paragraph": "The UNHCR Executive Committee has formulated a number of conclusions, providing guidance for protection during mixed population movements. Conclusion 94 on preserving the humanitarian and civilian character of asylum is attached as Annex C. It recommends, among other things, that States receiving influxes of refugees and combatants should take measures as early as possible to: \\n disarm armed elements; \\n identify and separate combatants from the refugee population; \\n intern combatants.", + "Paragraph": "The UNHCR Executive Committee has formulated a number of conclusions, providing guidance for protection during mixed population movements. Conclusion 94 on preserving the humanitarian and civilian character of asylum is attached as Annex C. It recommends, among other things, that States receiving influxes of refugees and combatants should take measures as early as possible to: \n disarm armed elements; \n identify and separate combatants from the refugee population; \n intern combatants.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -158952,7 +158952,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.5. Refugee law", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Conclusion 94 on preserving the humanitarian and civilian character of asylum is attached as Annex C. It recommends, among other things, that States receiving influxes of refugees and combatants should take measures as early as possible to: \\n disarm armed elements; \\n identify and separate combatants from the refugee population; \\n intern combatants.", + "Sentence": "Conclusion 94 on preserving the humanitarian and civilian character of asylum is attached as Annex C. It recommends, among other things, that States receiving influxes of refugees and combatants should take measures as early as possible to: \n disarm armed elements; \n identify and separate combatants from the refugee population; \n intern combatants.", "newParagraph": "unhcr executive committee formulated number conclusion providing guidance protection mixed population movement conclusion 94 preserving humanitarian civilian character asylum attached annex c recommends among thing state receiving influx refugee combatant take measure early possible n disarm armed element n identify separate combatant refugee population n intern combatant", "ProcessedSent": "conclusion 94 preserving humanitarian civilian character asylum attached annex c recommends among thing state receiving influx refugee combatant take measure early possible n disarm armed element n identify separate combatant refugee population n intern combatant", "SentID": 8830 @@ -159337,7 +159337,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2577, - "Paragraph": "What key points should be highlighted in advocacy on international obligations? \\n The government must respect the right to seek asylum and the principle of non-refoulement for all persons seeking asylum, including acceptance at the frontier; \\n The government must take measures to identify, disarm and separate combatants from refugees as early as possible, preferably at the border; \\n The government of a neutral State has an obligation to intern identified combatants in a safe location away from the border\/conflict zone; \\n An active combatant cannot be considered as a refugee. However, at a later stage, when it is clear that combatants have genuinely and permanently given up military activities, UNHCR would assist the government to determine the refugee status of demobilized former combatants using special procedures if any apply for refugee status; \\n Foreign children associated with armed forces and groups should be dealt with separately from adult foreign combatants and should benefit from special protection and assistance with regard to disarmament, demobilization, rehabilitation and reintegration. They should first be properly identified as persons under the age of 18, separated from adult combatants as soon as possible, and should not be accommodated in internment camps for adult combatants. They may be given the status of refugees or asylum seekers and accommodated in refugee camps or settlements in order to encourage their rehabilitation, reintegration and reconciliation with their communities; \\n Civilian family members of combatants should be treated as prima facie refugees or asylum seekers and may be accommodated in refugee camps or settlements; \\n Special assistance should be offered to women or girls abducted\/forcibly married into armed groups and forces and then taken over borders.", + "Paragraph": "What key points should be highlighted in advocacy on international obligations? \n The government must respect the right to seek asylum and the principle of non-refoulement for all persons seeking asylum, including acceptance at the frontier; \n The government must take measures to identify, disarm and separate combatants from refugees as early as possible, preferably at the border; \n The government of a neutral State has an obligation to intern identified combatants in a safe location away from the border\/conflict zone; \n An active combatant cannot be considered as a refugee. However, at a later stage, when it is clear that combatants have genuinely and permanently given up military activities, UNHCR would assist the government to determine the refugee status of demobilized former combatants using special procedures if any apply for refugee status; \n Foreign children associated with armed forces and groups should be dealt with separately from adult foreign combatants and should benefit from special protection and assistance with regard to disarmament, demobilization, rehabilitation and reintegration. They should first be properly identified as persons under the age of 18, separated from adult combatants as soon as possible, and should not be accommodated in internment camps for adult combatants. They may be given the status of refugees or asylum seekers and accommodated in refugee camps or settlements in order to encourage their rehabilitation, reintegration and reconciliation with their communities; \n Civilian family members of combatants should be treated as prima facie refugees or asylum seekers and may be accommodated in refugee camps or settlements; \n Special assistance should be offered to women or girls abducted\/forcibly married into armed groups and forces and then taken over borders.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -159355,7 +159355,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2577, - "Paragraph": "What key points should be highlighted in advocacy on international obligations? \\n The government must respect the right to seek asylum and the principle of non-refoulement for all persons seeking asylum, including acceptance at the frontier; \\n The government must take measures to identify, disarm and separate combatants from refugees as early as possible, preferably at the border; \\n The government of a neutral State has an obligation to intern identified combatants in a safe location away from the border\/conflict zone; \\n An active combatant cannot be considered as a refugee. However, at a later stage, when it is clear that combatants have genuinely and permanently given up military activities, UNHCR would assist the government to determine the refugee status of demobilized former combatants using special procedures if any apply for refugee status; \\n Foreign children associated with armed forces and groups should be dealt with separately from adult foreign combatants and should benefit from special protection and assistance with regard to disarmament, demobilization, rehabilitation and reintegration. They should first be properly identified as persons under the age of 18, separated from adult combatants as soon as possible, and should not be accommodated in internment camps for adult combatants. They may be given the status of refugees or asylum seekers and accommodated in refugee camps or settlements in order to encourage their rehabilitation, reintegration and reconciliation with their communities; \\n Civilian family members of combatants should be treated as prima facie refugees or asylum seekers and may be accommodated in refugee camps or settlements; \\n Special assistance should be offered to women or girls abducted\/forcibly married into armed groups and forces and then taken over borders.", + "Paragraph": "What key points should be highlighted in advocacy on international obligations? \n The government must respect the right to seek asylum and the principle of non-refoulement for all persons seeking asylum, including acceptance at the frontier; \n The government must take measures to identify, disarm and separate combatants from refugees as early as possible, preferably at the border; \n The government of a neutral State has an obligation to intern identified combatants in a safe location away from the border\/conflict zone; \n An active combatant cannot be considered as a refugee. However, at a later stage, when it is clear that combatants have genuinely and permanently given up military activities, UNHCR would assist the government to determine the refugee status of demobilized former combatants using special procedures if any apply for refugee status; \n Foreign children associated with armed forces and groups should be dealt with separately from adult foreign combatants and should benefit from special protection and assistance with regard to disarmament, demobilization, rehabilitation and reintegration. They should first be properly identified as persons under the age of 18, separated from adult combatants as soon as possible, and should not be accommodated in internment camps for adult combatants. They may be given the status of refugees or asylum seekers and accommodated in refugee camps or settlements in order to encourage their rehabilitation, reintegration and reconciliation with their communities; \n Civilian family members of combatants should be treated as prima facie refugees or asylum seekers and may be accommodated in refugee camps or settlements; \n Special assistance should be offered to women or girls abducted\/forcibly married into armed groups and forces and then taken over borders.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -159366,14 +159366,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.2. Advocacy", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The government must respect the right to seek asylum and the principle of non-refoulement for all persons seeking asylum, including acceptance at the frontier; \\n The government must take measures to identify, disarm and separate combatants from refugees as early as possible, preferably at the border; \\n The government of a neutral State has an obligation to intern identified combatants in a safe location away from the border\/conflict zone; \\n An active combatant cannot be considered as a refugee.", + "Sentence": "\n The government must respect the right to seek asylum and the principle of non-refoulement for all persons seeking asylum, including acceptance at the frontier; \n The government must take measures to identify, disarm and separate combatants from refugees as early as possible, preferably at the border; \n The government of a neutral State has an obligation to intern identified combatants in a safe location away from the border\/conflict zone; \n An active combatant cannot be considered as a refugee.", "newParagraph": "key point highlighted advocacy international obligation n government must respect right seek asylum principle nonrefoulement person seeking asylum including acceptance frontier n government must take measure identify disarm separate combatant refugee early possible preferably border n government neutral state obligation intern identified combatant safe location away borderconflict zone n active combatant cannot considered refugee however later stage clear combatant genuinely permanently given military activity unhcr would assist government determine refugee status demobilized former combatant using special procedure apply refugee status n foreign child associated armed force group dealt separately adult foreign combatant benefit special protection assistance regard disarmament demobilization rehabilitation reintegration first properly identified person age 18 separated adult combatant soon possible accommodated internment camp adult combatant may given status refugee asylum seeker accommodated refugee camp settlement order encourage rehabilitation reintegration reconciliation community n civilian family member combatant treated prima facie refugee asylum seeker may accommodated refugee camp settlement n special assistance offered woman girl abductedforcibly married armed group force taken border", "ProcessedSent": "n government must respect right seek asylum principle nonrefoulement person seeking asylum including acceptance frontier n government must take measure identify disarm separate combatant refugee early possible preferably border n government neutral state obligation intern identified combatant safe location away borderconflict zone n active combatant cannot considered refugee", "SentID": 8853 }, { "ParagraphID": 2577, - "Paragraph": "What key points should be highlighted in advocacy on international obligations? \\n The government must respect the right to seek asylum and the principle of non-refoulement for all persons seeking asylum, including acceptance at the frontier; \\n The government must take measures to identify, disarm and separate combatants from refugees as early as possible, preferably at the border; \\n The government of a neutral State has an obligation to intern identified combatants in a safe location away from the border\/conflict zone; \\n An active combatant cannot be considered as a refugee. However, at a later stage, when it is clear that combatants have genuinely and permanently given up military activities, UNHCR would assist the government to determine the refugee status of demobilized former combatants using special procedures if any apply for refugee status; \\n Foreign children associated with armed forces and groups should be dealt with separately from adult foreign combatants and should benefit from special protection and assistance with regard to disarmament, demobilization, rehabilitation and reintegration. They should first be properly identified as persons under the age of 18, separated from adult combatants as soon as possible, and should not be accommodated in internment camps for adult combatants. They may be given the status of refugees or asylum seekers and accommodated in refugee camps or settlements in order to encourage their rehabilitation, reintegration and reconciliation with their communities; \\n Civilian family members of combatants should be treated as prima facie refugees or asylum seekers and may be accommodated in refugee camps or settlements; \\n Special assistance should be offered to women or girls abducted\/forcibly married into armed groups and forces and then taken over borders.", + "Paragraph": "What key points should be highlighted in advocacy on international obligations? \n The government must respect the right to seek asylum and the principle of non-refoulement for all persons seeking asylum, including acceptance at the frontier; \n The government must take measures to identify, disarm and separate combatants from refugees as early as possible, preferably at the border; \n The government of a neutral State has an obligation to intern identified combatants in a safe location away from the border\/conflict zone; \n An active combatant cannot be considered as a refugee. However, at a later stage, when it is clear that combatants have genuinely and permanently given up military activities, UNHCR would assist the government to determine the refugee status of demobilized former combatants using special procedures if any apply for refugee status; \n Foreign children associated with armed forces and groups should be dealt with separately from adult foreign combatants and should benefit from special protection and assistance with regard to disarmament, demobilization, rehabilitation and reintegration. They should first be properly identified as persons under the age of 18, separated from adult combatants as soon as possible, and should not be accommodated in internment camps for adult combatants. They may be given the status of refugees or asylum seekers and accommodated in refugee camps or settlements in order to encourage their rehabilitation, reintegration and reconciliation with their communities; \n Civilian family members of combatants should be treated as prima facie refugees or asylum seekers and may be accommodated in refugee camps or settlements; \n Special assistance should be offered to women or girls abducted\/forcibly married into armed groups and forces and then taken over borders.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -159384,14 +159384,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.2. Advocacy", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "However, at a later stage, when it is clear that combatants have genuinely and permanently given up military activities, UNHCR would assist the government to determine the refugee status of demobilized former combatants using special procedures if any apply for refugee status; \\n Foreign children associated with armed forces and groups should be dealt with separately from adult foreign combatants and should benefit from special protection and assistance with regard to disarmament, demobilization, rehabilitation and reintegration.", + "Sentence": "However, at a later stage, when it is clear that combatants have genuinely and permanently given up military activities, UNHCR would assist the government to determine the refugee status of demobilized former combatants using special procedures if any apply for refugee status; \n Foreign children associated with armed forces and groups should be dealt with separately from adult foreign combatants and should benefit from special protection and assistance with regard to disarmament, demobilization, rehabilitation and reintegration.", "newParagraph": "key point highlighted advocacy international obligation n government must respect right seek asylum principle nonrefoulement person seeking asylum including acceptance frontier n government must take measure identify disarm separate combatant refugee early possible preferably border n government neutral state obligation intern identified combatant safe location away borderconflict zone n active combatant cannot considered refugee however later stage clear combatant genuinely permanently given military activity unhcr would assist government determine refugee status demobilized former combatant using special procedure apply refugee status n foreign child associated armed force group dealt separately adult foreign combatant benefit special protection assistance regard disarmament demobilization rehabilitation reintegration first properly identified person age 18 separated adult combatant soon possible accommodated internment camp adult combatant may given status refugee asylum seeker accommodated refugee camp settlement order encourage rehabilitation reintegration reconciliation community n civilian family member combatant treated prima facie refugee asylum seeker may accommodated refugee camp settlement n special assistance offered woman girl abductedforcibly married armed group force taken border", "ProcessedSent": "however later stage clear combatant genuinely permanently given military activity unhcr would assist government determine refugee status demobilized former combatant using special procedure apply refugee status n foreign child associated armed force group dealt separately adult foreign combatant benefit special protection assistance regard disarmament demobilization rehabilitation reintegration", "SentID": 8854 }, { "ParagraphID": 2577, - "Paragraph": "What key points should be highlighted in advocacy on international obligations? \\n The government must respect the right to seek asylum and the principle of non-refoulement for all persons seeking asylum, including acceptance at the frontier; \\n The government must take measures to identify, disarm and separate combatants from refugees as early as possible, preferably at the border; \\n The government of a neutral State has an obligation to intern identified combatants in a safe location away from the border\/conflict zone; \\n An active combatant cannot be considered as a refugee. However, at a later stage, when it is clear that combatants have genuinely and permanently given up military activities, UNHCR would assist the government to determine the refugee status of demobilized former combatants using special procedures if any apply for refugee status; \\n Foreign children associated with armed forces and groups should be dealt with separately from adult foreign combatants and should benefit from special protection and assistance with regard to disarmament, demobilization, rehabilitation and reintegration. They should first be properly identified as persons under the age of 18, separated from adult combatants as soon as possible, and should not be accommodated in internment camps for adult combatants. They may be given the status of refugees or asylum seekers and accommodated in refugee camps or settlements in order to encourage their rehabilitation, reintegration and reconciliation with their communities; \\n Civilian family members of combatants should be treated as prima facie refugees or asylum seekers and may be accommodated in refugee camps or settlements; \\n Special assistance should be offered to women or girls abducted\/forcibly married into armed groups and forces and then taken over borders.", + "Paragraph": "What key points should be highlighted in advocacy on international obligations? \n The government must respect the right to seek asylum and the principle of non-refoulement for all persons seeking asylum, including acceptance at the frontier; \n The government must take measures to identify, disarm and separate combatants from refugees as early as possible, preferably at the border; \n The government of a neutral State has an obligation to intern identified combatants in a safe location away from the border\/conflict zone; \n An active combatant cannot be considered as a refugee. However, at a later stage, when it is clear that combatants have genuinely and permanently given up military activities, UNHCR would assist the government to determine the refugee status of demobilized former combatants using special procedures if any apply for refugee status; \n Foreign children associated with armed forces and groups should be dealt with separately from adult foreign combatants and should benefit from special protection and assistance with regard to disarmament, demobilization, rehabilitation and reintegration. They should first be properly identified as persons under the age of 18, separated from adult combatants as soon as possible, and should not be accommodated in internment camps for adult combatants. They may be given the status of refugees or asylum seekers and accommodated in refugee camps or settlements in order to encourage their rehabilitation, reintegration and reconciliation with their communities; \n Civilian family members of combatants should be treated as prima facie refugees or asylum seekers and may be accommodated in refugee camps or settlements; \n Special assistance should be offered to women or girls abducted\/forcibly married into armed groups and forces and then taken over borders.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -159409,7 +159409,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2577, - "Paragraph": "What key points should be highlighted in advocacy on international obligations? \\n The government must respect the right to seek asylum and the principle of non-refoulement for all persons seeking asylum, including acceptance at the frontier; \\n The government must take measures to identify, disarm and separate combatants from refugees as early as possible, preferably at the border; \\n The government of a neutral State has an obligation to intern identified combatants in a safe location away from the border\/conflict zone; \\n An active combatant cannot be considered as a refugee. However, at a later stage, when it is clear that combatants have genuinely and permanently given up military activities, UNHCR would assist the government to determine the refugee status of demobilized former combatants using special procedures if any apply for refugee status; \\n Foreign children associated with armed forces and groups should be dealt with separately from adult foreign combatants and should benefit from special protection and assistance with regard to disarmament, demobilization, rehabilitation and reintegration. They should first be properly identified as persons under the age of 18, separated from adult combatants as soon as possible, and should not be accommodated in internment camps for adult combatants. They may be given the status of refugees or asylum seekers and accommodated in refugee camps or settlements in order to encourage their rehabilitation, reintegration and reconciliation with their communities; \\n Civilian family members of combatants should be treated as prima facie refugees or asylum seekers and may be accommodated in refugee camps or settlements; \\n Special assistance should be offered to women or girls abducted\/forcibly married into armed groups and forces and then taken over borders.", + "Paragraph": "What key points should be highlighted in advocacy on international obligations? \n The government must respect the right to seek asylum and the principle of non-refoulement for all persons seeking asylum, including acceptance at the frontier; \n The government must take measures to identify, disarm and separate combatants from refugees as early as possible, preferably at the border; \n The government of a neutral State has an obligation to intern identified combatants in a safe location away from the border\/conflict zone; \n An active combatant cannot be considered as a refugee. However, at a later stage, when it is clear that combatants have genuinely and permanently given up military activities, UNHCR would assist the government to determine the refugee status of demobilized former combatants using special procedures if any apply for refugee status; \n Foreign children associated with armed forces and groups should be dealt with separately from adult foreign combatants and should benefit from special protection and assistance with regard to disarmament, demobilization, rehabilitation and reintegration. They should first be properly identified as persons under the age of 18, separated from adult combatants as soon as possible, and should not be accommodated in internment camps for adult combatants. They may be given the status of refugees or asylum seekers and accommodated in refugee camps or settlements in order to encourage their rehabilitation, reintegration and reconciliation with their communities; \n Civilian family members of combatants should be treated as prima facie refugees or asylum seekers and may be accommodated in refugee camps or settlements; \n Special assistance should be offered to women or girls abducted\/forcibly married into armed groups and forces and then taken over borders.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -159420,7 +159420,7 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.2. Advocacy", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "They may be given the status of refugees or asylum seekers and accommodated in refugee camps or settlements in order to encourage their rehabilitation, reintegration and reconciliation with their communities; \\n Civilian family members of combatants should be treated as prima facie refugees or asylum seekers and may be accommodated in refugee camps or settlements; \\n Special assistance should be offered to women or girls abducted\/forcibly married into armed groups and forces and then taken over borders.", + "Sentence": "They may be given the status of refugees or asylum seekers and accommodated in refugee camps or settlements in order to encourage their rehabilitation, reintegration and reconciliation with their communities; \n Civilian family members of combatants should be treated as prima facie refugees or asylum seekers and may be accommodated in refugee camps or settlements; \n Special assistance should be offered to women or girls abducted\/forcibly married into armed groups and forces and then taken over borders.", "newParagraph": "key point highlighted advocacy international obligation n government must respect right seek asylum principle nonrefoulement person seeking asylum including acceptance frontier n government must take measure identify disarm separate combatant refugee early possible preferably border n government neutral state obligation intern identified combatant safe location away borderconflict zone n active combatant cannot considered refugee however later stage clear combatant genuinely permanently given military activity unhcr would assist government determine refugee status demobilized former combatant using special procedure apply refugee status n foreign child associated armed force group dealt separately adult foreign combatant benefit special protection assistance regard disarmament demobilization rehabilitation reintegration first properly identified person age 18 separated adult combatant soon possible accommodated internment camp adult combatant may given status refugee asylum seeker accommodated refugee camp settlement order encourage rehabilitation reintegration reconciliation community n civilian family member combatant treated prima facie refugee asylum seeker may accommodated refugee camp settlement n special assistance offered woman girl abductedforcibly married armed group force taken border", "ProcessedSent": "may given status refugee asylum seeker accommodated refugee camp settlement order encourage rehabilitation reintegration reconciliation community n civilian family member combatant treated prima facie refugee asylum seeker may accommodated refugee camp settlement n special assistance offered woman girl abductedforcibly married armed group force taken border", "SentID": 8856 @@ -159625,7 +159625,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2583, - "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \\n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \\n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \\n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \\n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \\n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", + "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -159643,7 +159643,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2583, - "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \\n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \\n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \\n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \\n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \\n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", + "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -159654,14 +159654,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.4. Methods of identifying foreign combatants", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Self-identification.", + "Sentence": "\n Self-identification.", "newParagraph": "method identification n selfidentification especially situation known host government facility foreign combatant combatant may identify voluntarily either part military structure individually providing information availability internment camp facility foreign combatant may encourage selfidentification group combatant country war may negotiate host country cross territory actually peacekeeper presence border may role play negotiation motivation identify combatant usually either desert longterm basis perhaps seek asylum escape heat battle temporarily n appearance military uniform weapon arriving troop formation obvious sign person combatant even uniform weapon military security official host country often skilful recognizing fellow military security personnel appearance demeanour gait scar wound response military language command etc combatant hand may show sign carried gun foot may show mark indicating worn boot tattoo may related various fighting faction combatant may healthier stronger refugee especially situation food limited important avoid arbitrarily identifying single ablebodied young men combatant among refugee influx likely boy young men fleeing forced military recruitment may never fought n security screening question luggage search question asked background foreigner entering host country place residence occupation circumstance flight family situation etc may reveal individual military background luggage search may reveal military uniform insignia arm lack belonging may also indication combatant status depending circumstance flight n identification refugee local community refugee may show fear wariness combatant may point combatant midst either entry point part relocation movement refugee camp local community may report presence stranger suspect combatant carefully verified individual concerned opportunity prove wrongly identified combatant case n perpetrator crossborder armed incursion attack host country authority may intercept combatant launching crossborder attack pose serious threat country stricter security confinement measure would necessary individual", "ProcessedSent": "n selfidentification", "SentID": 8869 }, { "ParagraphID": 2583, - "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \\n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \\n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \\n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \\n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \\n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", + "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -159679,7 +159679,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2583, - "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \\n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \\n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \\n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \\n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \\n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", + "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -159697,7 +159697,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2583, - "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \\n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \\n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \\n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \\n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \\n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", + "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -159715,7 +159715,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2583, - "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \\n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \\n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \\n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \\n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \\n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", + "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -159733,7 +159733,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2583, - "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \\n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \\n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \\n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \\n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \\n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", + "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -159744,14 +159744,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.4. Methods of identifying foreign combatants", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Appearance.", + "Sentence": "\n Appearance.", "newParagraph": "method identification n selfidentification especially situation known host government facility foreign combatant combatant may identify voluntarily either part military structure individually providing information availability internment camp facility foreign combatant may encourage selfidentification group combatant country war may negotiate host country cross territory actually peacekeeper presence border may role play negotiation motivation identify combatant usually either desert longterm basis perhaps seek asylum escape heat battle temporarily n appearance military uniform weapon arriving troop formation obvious sign person combatant even uniform weapon military security official host country often skilful recognizing fellow military security personnel appearance demeanour gait scar wound response military language command etc combatant hand may show sign carried gun foot may show mark indicating worn boot tattoo may related various fighting faction combatant may healthier stronger refugee especially situation food limited important avoid arbitrarily identifying single ablebodied young men combatant among refugee influx likely boy young men fleeing forced military recruitment may never fought n security screening question luggage search question asked background foreigner entering host country place residence occupation circumstance flight family situation etc may reveal individual military background luggage search may reveal military uniform insignia arm lack belonging may also indication combatant status depending circumstance flight n identification refugee local community refugee may show fear wariness combatant may point combatant midst either entry point part relocation movement refugee camp local community may report presence stranger suspect combatant carefully verified individual concerned opportunity prove wrongly identified combatant case n perpetrator crossborder armed incursion attack host country authority may intercept combatant launching crossborder attack pose serious threat country stricter security confinement measure would necessary individual", "ProcessedSent": "n appearance", "SentID": 8874 }, { "ParagraphID": 2583, - "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \\n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \\n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \\n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \\n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \\n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", + "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -159769,7 +159769,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2583, - "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \\n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \\n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \\n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \\n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \\n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", + "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -159787,7 +159787,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2583, - "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \\n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \\n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \\n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \\n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \\n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", + "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -159805,7 +159805,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2583, - "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \\n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \\n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \\n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \\n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \\n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", + "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -159823,7 +159823,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2583, - "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \\n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \\n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \\n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \\n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \\n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", + "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -159841,7 +159841,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2583, - "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \\n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \\n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \\n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \\n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \\n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", + "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -159859,7 +159859,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2583, - "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \\n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \\n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \\n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \\n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \\n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", + "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -159870,14 +159870,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.4. Methods of identifying foreign combatants", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Security screening questions and luggage searches.", + "Sentence": "\n Security screening questions and luggage searches.", "newParagraph": "method identification n selfidentification especially situation known host government facility foreign combatant combatant may identify voluntarily either part military structure individually providing information availability internment camp facility foreign combatant may encourage selfidentification group combatant country war may negotiate host country cross territory actually peacekeeper presence border may role play negotiation motivation identify combatant usually either desert longterm basis perhaps seek asylum escape heat battle temporarily n appearance military uniform weapon arriving troop formation obvious sign person combatant even uniform weapon military security official host country often skilful recognizing fellow military security personnel appearance demeanour gait scar wound response military language command etc combatant hand may show sign carried gun foot may show mark indicating worn boot tattoo may related various fighting faction combatant may healthier stronger refugee especially situation food limited important avoid arbitrarily identifying single ablebodied young men combatant among refugee influx likely boy young men fleeing forced military recruitment may never fought n security screening question luggage search question asked background foreigner entering host country place residence occupation circumstance flight family situation etc may reveal individual military background luggage search may reveal military uniform insignia arm lack belonging may also indication combatant status depending circumstance flight n identification refugee local community refugee may show fear wariness combatant may point combatant midst either entry point part relocation movement refugee camp local community may report presence stranger suspect combatant carefully verified individual concerned opportunity prove wrongly identified combatant case n perpetrator crossborder armed incursion attack host country authority may intercept combatant launching crossborder attack pose serious threat country stricter security confinement measure would necessary individual", "ProcessedSent": "n security screening question luggage search", "SentID": 8881 }, { "ParagraphID": 2583, - "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \\n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \\n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \\n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \\n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \\n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", + "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -159895,7 +159895,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2583, - "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \\n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \\n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \\n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \\n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \\n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", + "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -159913,7 +159913,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2583, - "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \\n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \\n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \\n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \\n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \\n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", + "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -159931,7 +159931,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2583, - "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \\n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \\n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \\n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \\n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \\n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", + "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -159949,7 +159949,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2583, - "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \\n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \\n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \\n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \\n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \\n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", + "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -159960,14 +159960,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.4. Methods of identifying foreign combatants", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Identification by refugees and local communities.", + "Sentence": "\n Identification by refugees and local communities.", "newParagraph": "method identification n selfidentification especially situation known host government facility foreign combatant combatant may identify voluntarily either part military structure individually providing information availability internment camp facility foreign combatant may encourage selfidentification group combatant country war may negotiate host country cross territory actually peacekeeper presence border may role play negotiation motivation identify combatant usually either desert longterm basis perhaps seek asylum escape heat battle temporarily n appearance military uniform weapon arriving troop formation obvious sign person combatant even uniform weapon military security official host country often skilful recognizing fellow military security personnel appearance demeanour gait scar wound response military language command etc combatant hand may show sign carried gun foot may show mark indicating worn boot tattoo may related various fighting faction combatant may healthier stronger refugee especially situation food limited important avoid arbitrarily identifying single ablebodied young men combatant among refugee influx likely boy young men fleeing forced military recruitment may never fought n security screening question luggage search question asked background foreigner entering host country place residence occupation circumstance flight family situation etc may reveal individual military background luggage search may reveal military uniform insignia arm lack belonging may also indication combatant status depending circumstance flight n identification refugee local community refugee may show fear wariness combatant may point combatant midst either entry point part relocation movement refugee camp local community may report presence stranger suspect combatant carefully verified individual concerned opportunity prove wrongly identified combatant case n perpetrator crossborder armed incursion attack host country authority may intercept combatant launching crossborder attack pose serious threat country stricter security confinement measure would necessary individual", "ProcessedSent": "n identification refugee local community", "SentID": 8886 }, { "ParagraphID": 2583, - "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \\n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \\n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \\n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \\n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \\n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", + "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -159985,7 +159985,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2583, - "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \\n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \\n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \\n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \\n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \\n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", + "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -160003,7 +160003,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2583, - "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \\n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \\n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \\n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \\n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \\n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", + "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -160021,7 +160021,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2583, - "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \\n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \\n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \\n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \\n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \\n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", + "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -160032,14 +160032,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.4. Methods of identifying foreign combatants", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks.", + "Sentence": "\n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks.", "newParagraph": "method identification n selfidentification especially situation known host government facility foreign combatant combatant may identify voluntarily either part military structure individually providing information availability internment camp facility foreign combatant may encourage selfidentification group combatant country war may negotiate host country cross territory actually peacekeeper presence border may role play negotiation motivation identify combatant usually either desert longterm basis perhaps seek asylum escape heat battle temporarily n appearance military uniform weapon arriving troop formation obvious sign person combatant even uniform weapon military security official host country often skilful recognizing fellow military security personnel appearance demeanour gait scar wound response military language command etc combatant hand may show sign carried gun foot may show mark indicating worn boot tattoo may related various fighting faction combatant may healthier stronger refugee especially situation food limited important avoid arbitrarily identifying single ablebodied young men combatant among refugee influx likely boy young men fleeing forced military recruitment may never fought n security screening question luggage search question asked background foreigner entering host country place residence occupation circumstance flight family situation etc may reveal individual military background luggage search may reveal military uniform insignia arm lack belonging may also indication combatant status depending circumstance flight n identification refugee local community refugee may show fear wariness combatant may point combatant midst either entry point part relocation movement refugee camp local community may report presence stranger suspect combatant carefully verified individual concerned opportunity prove wrongly identified combatant case n perpetrator crossborder armed incursion attack host country authority may intercept combatant launching crossborder attack pose serious threat country stricter security confinement measure would necessary individual", "ProcessedSent": "n perpetrator crossborder armed incursion attack", "SentID": 8890 }, { "ParagraphID": 2583, - "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \\n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \\n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \\n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \\n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \\n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", + "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -160057,7 +160057,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2583, - "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \\n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \\n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \\n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \\n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \\n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", + "Paragraph": "What methods are there for identification? \n Self-identification. Especially in situations where it is known that the host government has facilities for foreign combatants, some combatants may identify themselves voluntarily, either as part of military structures or individually. Providing information on the availability of internment camp facilities for foreign combatants may encourage self-identification. Groups of combatants from a country at war may negotiate with a host country to cross into its territory before actually doing so, and peacekeepers with a presence at the border may have a role to play in such negotiations. The motivation of those who identify themselves as combatants is usually either to desert on a long-term basis and perhaps to seek asylum or to escape the heat of battle temporarily. \n Appearance. Military uniforms, weapons and arriving in troop formation are obvious signs of persons being combatants. Even where there are no uniforms or weapons, military and security officials of the host country will often be skilful at recognizing fellow military and security personnel \u2014 from appearance, demeanour, gait, scars and wounds, responses to military language and commands, etc. Combatants\u2019 hands may show signs of having carried guns, while their feet may show marks indicating that they have worn boots. Tattoos may be related to the various fighting factions. Combatants may be healthier and stronger than refugees, especially in situations where food is limited. It is important to avoid arbitrarily identifying all single, able-bodied young men as combatants, as among refugee influxes there are likely to be boys and young men who have been fleeing from forced military recruitment, and they may never have fought. \n Security screening questions and luggage searches. Questions asked about the background of foreigners entering the host country (place of residence, occupation, circumstances of flight, family situation, etc.) may reveal that the individual has a military background. Luggage searches may reveal military uniforms, insignia or arms. Lack of belongings may also be an indication of combatant status, depending on the circumstances of flight. \n Identification by refugees and local communities. Some refugees may show fear or wariness of combatants and may point out combatants in their midst, either at entry points or as part of relocation movements to refugee camps. Local communities may report the presence of strangers whom they suspect of being combatants. This should be carefully verified and the individual(s) concerned should have the opportunity to prove that they have been wrongly identified as combatants, if that is the case. \n Perpetrators of cross-border armed incursions and attacks. Host country authorities may intercept combatants who are launching cross-border attacks and who pose a serious threat to the country. Stricter security and confinement measures would be necessary for such individuals.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -160525,7 +160525,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2590, - "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \\n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \\n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \\n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \\n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \\n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \\n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \\n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \\n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \\n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \\n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \\n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \\n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \\n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \\n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \\n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", + "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -160543,7 +160543,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2590, - "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \\n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \\n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \\n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \\n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \\n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \\n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \\n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \\n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \\n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \\n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \\n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \\n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \\n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \\n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \\n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", + "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -160554,14 +160554,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Standards of internment", - "Sentence": "\\n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art.", + "Sentence": "\n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art.", "newParagraph": "basic standard third geneva convention n internee must treated humanely time entitled respect person art 3 n must harmful discrimination among internee art 16 n female internee must treated way caters specific need must given treatment favourable given men art 14 n internee must provided free charge necessary maintenance medical attention required state health art 15 n physical mental torture form coercion may inflicted get information kind art 17 n internee must provided identity card art 17 n separated civilian combatant must evacuated soon possible camp safe distance away combat zone evacuation must carried humanely ie evacuee must given sufficient food drinking water necessary clothing medical attention art 19 20 n interned combatant must accommodated prison art 22 n place internment must hygienic healthy place live internee quarter must protected dampness adequately heated lighted level 5 crosscutting issue crossborder population movement 15 540 condition must harm health camp must kept clean proper sanitary measure taken prevent epidemic art 22 25 29 n female internee must accommodated separately men separate dormitory hygienic supply provided art 25 29 n daily food ration must sufficient quantity quality variety keep internee good health habitual diet must also taken account art 26 n internee must enjoy complete freedom exercise religion practice sport intellectual activity art 34 38 n internee must permitted receive send letter well individual parcel collective shipment eg food clothing art 71 73 n internee working condition properly regulated art 49 57 n internee must right make request authority interning regarding condition captivity art 78", "ProcessedSent": "n internee must treated humanely time entitled respect person art", "SentID": 8919 }, { "ParagraphID": 2590, - "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \\n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \\n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \\n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \\n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \\n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \\n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \\n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \\n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \\n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \\n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \\n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \\n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \\n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \\n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \\n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", + "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -160572,14 +160572,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Standards of internment", - "Sentence": "3); \\n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art.", + "Sentence": "3); \n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art.", "newParagraph": "basic standard third geneva convention n internee must treated humanely time entitled respect person art 3 n must harmful discrimination among internee art 16 n female internee must treated way caters specific need must given treatment favourable given men art 14 n internee must provided free charge necessary maintenance medical attention required state health art 15 n physical mental torture form coercion may inflicted get information kind art 17 n internee must provided identity card art 17 n separated civilian combatant must evacuated soon possible camp safe distance away combat zone evacuation must carried humanely ie evacuee must given sufficient food drinking water necessary clothing medical attention art 19 20 n interned combatant must accommodated prison art 22 n place internment must hygienic healthy place live internee quarter must protected dampness adequately heated lighted level 5 crosscutting issue crossborder population movement 15 540 condition must harm health camp must kept clean proper sanitary measure taken prevent epidemic art 22 25 29 n female internee must accommodated separately men separate dormitory hygienic supply provided art 25 29 n daily food ration must sufficient quantity quality variety keep internee good health habitual diet must also taken account art 26 n internee must enjoy complete freedom exercise religion practice sport intellectual activity art 34 38 n internee must permitted receive send letter well individual parcel collective shipment eg food clothing art 71 73 n internee working condition properly regulated art 49 57 n internee must right make request authority interning regarding condition captivity art 78", "ProcessedSent": "3 n must harmful discrimination among internee art", "SentID": 8920 }, { "ParagraphID": 2590, - "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \\n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \\n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \\n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \\n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \\n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \\n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \\n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \\n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \\n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \\n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \\n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \\n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \\n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \\n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \\n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", + "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -160590,14 +160590,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Standards of internment", - "Sentence": "16); \\n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art.", + "Sentence": "16); \n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art.", "newParagraph": "basic standard third geneva convention n internee must treated humanely time entitled respect person art 3 n must harmful discrimination among internee art 16 n female internee must treated way caters specific need must given treatment favourable given men art 14 n internee must provided free charge necessary maintenance medical attention required state health art 15 n physical mental torture form coercion may inflicted get information kind art 17 n internee must provided identity card art 17 n separated civilian combatant must evacuated soon possible camp safe distance away combat zone evacuation must carried humanely ie evacuee must given sufficient food drinking water necessary clothing medical attention art 19 20 n interned combatant must accommodated prison art 22 n place internment must hygienic healthy place live internee quarter must protected dampness adequately heated lighted level 5 crosscutting issue crossborder population movement 15 540 condition must harm health camp must kept clean proper sanitary measure taken prevent epidemic art 22 25 29 n female internee must accommodated separately men separate dormitory hygienic supply provided art 25 29 n daily food ration must sufficient quantity quality variety keep internee good health habitual diet must also taken account art 26 n internee must enjoy complete freedom exercise religion practice sport intellectual activity art 34 38 n internee must permitted receive send letter well individual parcel collective shipment eg food clothing art 71 73 n internee working condition properly regulated art 49 57 n internee must right make request authority interning regarding condition captivity art 78", "ProcessedSent": "16 n female internee must treated way caters specific need must given treatment favourable given men art", "SentID": 8921 }, { "ParagraphID": 2590, - "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \\n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \\n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \\n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \\n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \\n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \\n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \\n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \\n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \\n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \\n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \\n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \\n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \\n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \\n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \\n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", + "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -160608,14 +160608,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Standards of internment", - "Sentence": "14); \\n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art.", + "Sentence": "14); \n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art.", "newParagraph": "basic standard third geneva convention n internee must treated humanely time entitled respect person art 3 n must harmful discrimination among internee art 16 n female internee must treated way caters specific need must given treatment favourable given men art 14 n internee must provided free charge necessary maintenance medical attention required state health art 15 n physical mental torture form coercion may inflicted get information kind art 17 n internee must provided identity card art 17 n separated civilian combatant must evacuated soon possible camp safe distance away combat zone evacuation must carried humanely ie evacuee must given sufficient food drinking water necessary clothing medical attention art 19 20 n interned combatant must accommodated prison art 22 n place internment must hygienic healthy place live internee quarter must protected dampness adequately heated lighted level 5 crosscutting issue crossborder population movement 15 540 condition must harm health camp must kept clean proper sanitary measure taken prevent epidemic art 22 25 29 n female internee must accommodated separately men separate dormitory hygienic supply provided art 25 29 n daily food ration must sufficient quantity quality variety keep internee good health habitual diet must also taken account art 26 n internee must enjoy complete freedom exercise religion practice sport intellectual activity art 34 38 n internee must permitted receive send letter well individual parcel collective shipment eg food clothing art 71 73 n internee working condition properly regulated art 49 57 n internee must right make request authority interning regarding condition captivity art 78", "ProcessedSent": "14 n internee must provided free charge necessary maintenance medical attention required state health art", "SentID": 8922 }, { "ParagraphID": 2590, - "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \\n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \\n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \\n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \\n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \\n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \\n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \\n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \\n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \\n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \\n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \\n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \\n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \\n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \\n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \\n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", + "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -160626,14 +160626,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Standards of internment", - "Sentence": "15); \\n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art.", + "Sentence": "15); \n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art.", "newParagraph": "basic standard third geneva convention n internee must treated humanely time entitled respect person art 3 n must harmful discrimination among internee art 16 n female internee must treated way caters specific need must given treatment favourable given men art 14 n internee must provided free charge necessary maintenance medical attention required state health art 15 n physical mental torture form coercion may inflicted get information kind art 17 n internee must provided identity card art 17 n separated civilian combatant must evacuated soon possible camp safe distance away combat zone evacuation must carried humanely ie evacuee must given sufficient food drinking water necessary clothing medical attention art 19 20 n interned combatant must accommodated prison art 22 n place internment must hygienic healthy place live internee quarter must protected dampness adequately heated lighted level 5 crosscutting issue crossborder population movement 15 540 condition must harm health camp must kept clean proper sanitary measure taken prevent epidemic art 22 25 29 n female internee must accommodated separately men separate dormitory hygienic supply provided art 25 29 n daily food ration must sufficient quantity quality variety keep internee good health habitual diet must also taken account art 26 n internee must enjoy complete freedom exercise religion practice sport intellectual activity art 34 38 n internee must permitted receive send letter well individual parcel collective shipment eg food clothing art 71 73 n internee working condition properly regulated art 49 57 n internee must right make request authority interning regarding condition captivity art 78", "ProcessedSent": "15 n physical mental torture form coercion may inflicted get information kind art", "SentID": 8923 }, { "ParagraphID": 2590, - "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \\n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \\n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \\n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \\n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \\n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \\n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \\n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \\n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \\n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \\n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \\n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \\n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \\n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \\n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \\n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", + "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -160644,14 +160644,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Standards of internment", - "Sentence": "17); \\n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art.", + "Sentence": "17); \n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art.", "newParagraph": "basic standard third geneva convention n internee must treated humanely time entitled respect person art 3 n must harmful discrimination among internee art 16 n female internee must treated way caters specific need must given treatment favourable given men art 14 n internee must provided free charge necessary maintenance medical attention required state health art 15 n physical mental torture form coercion may inflicted get information kind art 17 n internee must provided identity card art 17 n separated civilian combatant must evacuated soon possible camp safe distance away combat zone evacuation must carried humanely ie evacuee must given sufficient food drinking water necessary clothing medical attention art 19 20 n interned combatant must accommodated prison art 22 n place internment must hygienic healthy place live internee quarter must protected dampness adequately heated lighted level 5 crosscutting issue crossborder population movement 15 540 condition must harm health camp must kept clean proper sanitary measure taken prevent epidemic art 22 25 29 n female internee must accommodated separately men separate dormitory hygienic supply provided art 25 29 n daily food ration must sufficient quantity quality variety keep internee good health habitual diet must also taken account art 26 n internee must enjoy complete freedom exercise religion practice sport intellectual activity art 34 38 n internee must permitted receive send letter well individual parcel collective shipment eg food clothing art 71 73 n internee working condition properly regulated art 49 57 n internee must right make request authority interning regarding condition captivity art 78", "ProcessedSent": "17 n internee must provided identity card art", "SentID": 8924 }, { "ParagraphID": 2590, - "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \\n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \\n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \\n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \\n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \\n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \\n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \\n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \\n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \\n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \\n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \\n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \\n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \\n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \\n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \\n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", + "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -160662,14 +160662,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Standards of internment", - "Sentence": "17); \\n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts.", + "Sentence": "17); \n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts.", "newParagraph": "basic standard third geneva convention n internee must treated humanely time entitled respect person art 3 n must harmful discrimination among internee art 16 n female internee must treated way caters specific need must given treatment favourable given men art 14 n internee must provided free charge necessary maintenance medical attention required state health art 15 n physical mental torture form coercion may inflicted get information kind art 17 n internee must provided identity card art 17 n separated civilian combatant must evacuated soon possible camp safe distance away combat zone evacuation must carried humanely ie evacuee must given sufficient food drinking water necessary clothing medical attention art 19 20 n interned combatant must accommodated prison art 22 n place internment must hygienic healthy place live internee quarter must protected dampness adequately heated lighted level 5 crosscutting issue crossborder population movement 15 540 condition must harm health camp must kept clean proper sanitary measure taken prevent epidemic art 22 25 29 n female internee must accommodated separately men separate dormitory hygienic supply provided art 25 29 n daily food ration must sufficient quantity quality variety keep internee good health habitual diet must also taken account art 26 n internee must enjoy complete freedom exercise religion practice sport intellectual activity art 34 38 n internee must permitted receive send letter well individual parcel collective shipment eg food clothing art 71 73 n internee working condition properly regulated art 49 57 n internee must right make request authority interning regarding condition captivity art 78", "ProcessedSent": "17 n separated civilian combatant must evacuated soon possible camp safe distance away combat zone evacuation must carried humanely ie evacuee must given sufficient food drinking water necessary clothing medical attention art", "SentID": 8925 }, { "ParagraphID": 2590, - "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \\n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \\n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \\n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \\n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \\n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \\n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \\n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \\n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \\n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \\n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \\n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \\n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \\n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \\n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \\n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", + "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -160680,14 +160680,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Standards of internment", - "Sentence": "19 and 20); \\n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art.", + "Sentence": "19 and 20); \n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art.", "newParagraph": "basic standard third geneva convention n internee must treated humanely time entitled respect person art 3 n must harmful discrimination among internee art 16 n female internee must treated way caters specific need must given treatment favourable given men art 14 n internee must provided free charge necessary maintenance medical attention required state health art 15 n physical mental torture form coercion may inflicted get information kind art 17 n internee must provided identity card art 17 n separated civilian combatant must evacuated soon possible camp safe distance away combat zone evacuation must carried humanely ie evacuee must given sufficient food drinking water necessary clothing medical attention art 19 20 n interned combatant must accommodated prison art 22 n place internment must hygienic healthy place live internee quarter must protected dampness adequately heated lighted level 5 crosscutting issue crossborder population movement 15 540 condition must harm health camp must kept clean proper sanitary measure taken prevent epidemic art 22 25 29 n female internee must accommodated separately men separate dormitory hygienic supply provided art 25 29 n daily food ration must sufficient quantity quality variety keep internee good health habitual diet must also taken account art 26 n internee must enjoy complete freedom exercise religion practice sport intellectual activity art 34 38 n internee must permitted receive send letter well individual parcel collective shipment eg food clothing art 71 73 n internee working condition properly regulated art 49 57 n internee must right make request authority interning regarding condition captivity art 78", "ProcessedSent": "19 20 n interned combatant must accommodated prison art", "SentID": 8926 }, { "ParagraphID": 2590, - "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \\n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \\n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \\n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \\n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \\n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \\n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \\n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \\n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \\n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \\n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \\n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \\n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \\n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \\n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \\n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", + "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -160698,14 +160698,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Standards of internment", - "Sentence": "22); \\n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live.", + "Sentence": "22); \n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live.", "newParagraph": "basic standard third geneva convention n internee must treated humanely time entitled respect person art 3 n must harmful discrimination among internee art 16 n female internee must treated way caters specific need must given treatment favourable given men art 14 n internee must provided free charge necessary maintenance medical attention required state health art 15 n physical mental torture form coercion may inflicted get information kind art 17 n internee must provided identity card art 17 n separated civilian combatant must evacuated soon possible camp safe distance away combat zone evacuation must carried humanely ie evacuee must given sufficient food drinking water necessary clothing medical attention art 19 20 n interned combatant must accommodated prison art 22 n place internment must hygienic healthy place live internee quarter must protected dampness adequately heated lighted level 5 crosscutting issue crossborder population movement 15 540 condition must harm health camp must kept clean proper sanitary measure taken prevent epidemic art 22 25 29 n female internee must accommodated separately men separate dormitory hygienic supply provided art 25 29 n daily food ration must sufficient quantity quality variety keep internee good health habitual diet must also taken account art 26 n internee must enjoy complete freedom exercise religion practice sport intellectual activity art 34 38 n internee must permitted receive send letter well individual parcel collective shipment eg food clothing art 71 73 n internee working condition properly regulated art 49 57 n internee must right make request authority interning regarding condition captivity art 78", "ProcessedSent": "22 n place internment must hygienic healthy place live", "SentID": 8927 }, { "ParagraphID": 2590, - "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \\n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \\n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \\n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \\n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \\n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \\n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \\n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \\n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \\n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \\n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \\n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \\n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \\n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \\n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \\n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", + "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -160723,7 +160723,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2590, - "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \\n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \\n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \\n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \\n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \\n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \\n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \\n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \\n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \\n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \\n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \\n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \\n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \\n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \\n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \\n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", + "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -160741,7 +160741,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2590, - "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \\n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \\n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \\n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \\n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \\n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \\n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \\n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \\n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \\n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \\n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \\n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \\n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \\n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \\n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \\n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", + "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -160752,14 +160752,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Standards of internment", - "Sentence": "22, 25 and 29); \\n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts.", + "Sentence": "22, 25 and 29); \n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts.", "newParagraph": "basic standard third geneva convention n internee must treated humanely time entitled respect person art 3 n must harmful discrimination among internee art 16 n female internee must treated way caters specific need must given treatment favourable given men art 14 n internee must provided free charge necessary maintenance medical attention required state health art 15 n physical mental torture form coercion may inflicted get information kind art 17 n internee must provided identity card art 17 n separated civilian combatant must evacuated soon possible camp safe distance away combat zone evacuation must carried humanely ie evacuee must given sufficient food drinking water necessary clothing medical attention art 19 20 n interned combatant must accommodated prison art 22 n place internment must hygienic healthy place live internee quarter must protected dampness adequately heated lighted level 5 crosscutting issue crossborder population movement 15 540 condition must harm health camp must kept clean proper sanitary measure taken prevent epidemic art 22 25 29 n female internee must accommodated separately men separate dormitory hygienic supply provided art 25 29 n daily food ration must sufficient quantity quality variety keep internee good health habitual diet must also taken account art 26 n internee must enjoy complete freedom exercise religion practice sport intellectual activity art 34 38 n internee must permitted receive send letter well individual parcel collective shipment eg food clothing art 71 73 n internee working condition properly regulated art 49 57 n internee must right make request authority interning regarding condition captivity art 78", "ProcessedSent": "22 25 29 n female internee must accommodated separately men separate dormitory hygienic supply provided art", "SentID": 8930 }, { "ParagraphID": 2590, - "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \\n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \\n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \\n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \\n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \\n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \\n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \\n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \\n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \\n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \\n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \\n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \\n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \\n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \\n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \\n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", + "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -160770,14 +160770,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Standards of internment", - "Sentence": "25 and 29); \\n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art.", + "Sentence": "25 and 29); \n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art.", "newParagraph": "basic standard third geneva convention n internee must treated humanely time entitled respect person art 3 n must harmful discrimination among internee art 16 n female internee must treated way caters specific need must given treatment favourable given men art 14 n internee must provided free charge necessary maintenance medical attention required state health art 15 n physical mental torture form coercion may inflicted get information kind art 17 n internee must provided identity card art 17 n separated civilian combatant must evacuated soon possible camp safe distance away combat zone evacuation must carried humanely ie evacuee must given sufficient food drinking water necessary clothing medical attention art 19 20 n interned combatant must accommodated prison art 22 n place internment must hygienic healthy place live internee quarter must protected dampness adequately heated lighted level 5 crosscutting issue crossborder population movement 15 540 condition must harm health camp must kept clean proper sanitary measure taken prevent epidemic art 22 25 29 n female internee must accommodated separately men separate dormitory hygienic supply provided art 25 29 n daily food ration must sufficient quantity quality variety keep internee good health habitual diet must also taken account art 26 n internee must enjoy complete freedom exercise religion practice sport intellectual activity art 34 38 n internee must permitted receive send letter well individual parcel collective shipment eg food clothing art 71 73 n internee working condition properly regulated art 49 57 n internee must right make request authority interning regarding condition captivity art 78", "ProcessedSent": "25 29 n daily food ration must sufficient quantity quality variety keep internee good health habitual diet must also taken account art", "SentID": 8931 }, { "ParagraphID": 2590, - "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \\n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \\n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \\n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \\n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \\n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \\n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \\n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \\n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \\n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \\n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \\n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \\n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \\n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \\n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \\n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", + "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -160788,14 +160788,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Standards of internment", - "Sentence": "26); \\n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts.", + "Sentence": "26); \n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts.", "newParagraph": "basic standard third geneva convention n internee must treated humanely time entitled respect person art 3 n must harmful discrimination among internee art 16 n female internee must treated way caters specific need must given treatment favourable given men art 14 n internee must provided free charge necessary maintenance medical attention required state health art 15 n physical mental torture form coercion may inflicted get information kind art 17 n internee must provided identity card art 17 n separated civilian combatant must evacuated soon possible camp safe distance away combat zone evacuation must carried humanely ie evacuee must given sufficient food drinking water necessary clothing medical attention art 19 20 n interned combatant must accommodated prison art 22 n place internment must hygienic healthy place live internee quarter must protected dampness adequately heated lighted level 5 crosscutting issue crossborder population movement 15 540 condition must harm health camp must kept clean proper sanitary measure taken prevent epidemic art 22 25 29 n female internee must accommodated separately men separate dormitory hygienic supply provided art 25 29 n daily food ration must sufficient quantity quality variety keep internee good health habitual diet must also taken account art 26 n internee must enjoy complete freedom exercise religion practice sport intellectual activity art 34 38 n internee must permitted receive send letter well individual parcel collective shipment eg food clothing art 71 73 n internee working condition properly regulated art 49 57 n internee must right make request authority interning regarding condition captivity art 78", "ProcessedSent": "26 n internee must enjoy complete freedom exercise religion practice sport intellectual activity art", "SentID": 8932 }, { "ParagraphID": 2590, - "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \\n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \\n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \\n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \\n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \\n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \\n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \\n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \\n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \\n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \\n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \\n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \\n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \\n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \\n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \\n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", + "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -160806,14 +160806,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Standards of internment", - "Sentence": "34\u201338); \\n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts.", + "Sentence": "34\u201338); \n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts.", "newParagraph": "basic standard third geneva convention n internee must treated humanely time entitled respect person art 3 n must harmful discrimination among internee art 16 n female internee must treated way caters specific need must given treatment favourable given men art 14 n internee must provided free charge necessary maintenance medical attention required state health art 15 n physical mental torture form coercion may inflicted get information kind art 17 n internee must provided identity card art 17 n separated civilian combatant must evacuated soon possible camp safe distance away combat zone evacuation must carried humanely ie evacuee must given sufficient food drinking water necessary clothing medical attention art 19 20 n interned combatant must accommodated prison art 22 n place internment must hygienic healthy place live internee quarter must protected dampness adequately heated lighted level 5 crosscutting issue crossborder population movement 15 540 condition must harm health camp must kept clean proper sanitary measure taken prevent epidemic art 22 25 29 n female internee must accommodated separately men separate dormitory hygienic supply provided art 25 29 n daily food ration must sufficient quantity quality variety keep internee good health habitual diet must also taken account art 26 n internee must enjoy complete freedom exercise religion practice sport intellectual activity art 34 38 n internee must permitted receive send letter well individual parcel collective shipment eg food clothing art 71 73 n internee working condition properly regulated art 49 57 n internee must right make request authority interning regarding condition captivity art 78", "ProcessedSent": "34 38 n internee must permitted receive send letter well individual parcel collective shipment eg food clothing art", "SentID": 8933 }, { "ParagraphID": 2590, - "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \\n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \\n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \\n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \\n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \\n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \\n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \\n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \\n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \\n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \\n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \\n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \\n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \\n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \\n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \\n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", + "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -160824,14 +160824,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Standards of internment", - "Sentence": "71\u201373); \\n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts.", + "Sentence": "71\u201373); \n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts.", "newParagraph": "basic standard third geneva convention n internee must treated humanely time entitled respect person art 3 n must harmful discrimination among internee art 16 n female internee must treated way caters specific need must given treatment favourable given men art 14 n internee must provided free charge necessary maintenance medical attention required state health art 15 n physical mental torture form coercion may inflicted get information kind art 17 n internee must provided identity card art 17 n separated civilian combatant must evacuated soon possible camp safe distance away combat zone evacuation must carried humanely ie evacuee must given sufficient food drinking water necessary clothing medical attention art 19 20 n interned combatant must accommodated prison art 22 n place internment must hygienic healthy place live internee quarter must protected dampness adequately heated lighted level 5 crosscutting issue crossborder population movement 15 540 condition must harm health camp must kept clean proper sanitary measure taken prevent epidemic art 22 25 29 n female internee must accommodated separately men separate dormitory hygienic supply provided art 25 29 n daily food ration must sufficient quantity quality variety keep internee good health habitual diet must also taken account art 26 n internee must enjoy complete freedom exercise religion practice sport intellectual activity art 34 38 n internee must permitted receive send letter well individual parcel collective shipment eg food clothing art 71 73 n internee working condition properly regulated art 49 57 n internee must right make request authority interning regarding condition captivity art 78", "ProcessedSent": "71 73 n internee working condition properly regulated art", "SentID": 8934 }, { "ParagraphID": 2590, - "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \\n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \\n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \\n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \\n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \\n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \\n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \\n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \\n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \\n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \\n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \\n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \\n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \\n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \\n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \\n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", + "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -160842,14 +160842,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Standards of internment", - "Sentence": "49\u201357); \\n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art.", + "Sentence": "49\u201357); \n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art.", "newParagraph": "basic standard third geneva convention n internee must treated humanely time entitled respect person art 3 n must harmful discrimination among internee art 16 n female internee must treated way caters specific need must given treatment favourable given men art 14 n internee must provided free charge necessary maintenance medical attention required state health art 15 n physical mental torture form coercion may inflicted get information kind art 17 n internee must provided identity card art 17 n separated civilian combatant must evacuated soon possible camp safe distance away combat zone evacuation must carried humanely ie evacuee must given sufficient food drinking water necessary clothing medical attention art 19 20 n interned combatant must accommodated prison art 22 n place internment must hygienic healthy place live internee quarter must protected dampness adequately heated lighted level 5 crosscutting issue crossborder population movement 15 540 condition must harm health camp must kept clean proper sanitary measure taken prevent epidemic art 22 25 29 n female internee must accommodated separately men separate dormitory hygienic supply provided art 25 29 n daily food ration must sufficient quantity quality variety keep internee good health habitual diet must also taken account art 26 n internee must enjoy complete freedom exercise religion practice sport intellectual activity art 34 38 n internee must permitted receive send letter well individual parcel collective shipment eg food clothing art 71 73 n internee working condition properly regulated art 49 57 n internee must right make request authority interning regarding condition captivity art 78", "ProcessedSent": "49 57 n internee must right make request authority interning regarding condition captivity art", "SentID": 8935 }, { "ParagraphID": 2590, - "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \\n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \\n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \\n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \\n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \\n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \\n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \\n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \\n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \\n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \\n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \\n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \\n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \\n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \\n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \\n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", + "Paragraph": "What are the basic standards under the Third Geneva Convention? \n Internees must be treated humanely at all times and are entitled to respect for their person (art. 3); \n There must be no harmful discrimination among internees (art. 16); \n Female internees must be treated in a way that caters for their specific needs and must be given treatment as favourable as that given to men (art. 14); \n Internees must be provided, free of charge, with the necessary maintenance and medical attention required by their state of health (art. 15); \n No physical or mental torture, or any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to get information of any kind (art. 17); \n Internees must be provided with an identity card (art. 17); \n After they are separated from civilians, combatants must be evacuated as soon as possible to camps a safe distance away from the combat zone, and these evacuations must be carried out humanely (i.e., evacuees must be given sufficient food, drinking water and necessary clothing and medical attention) (arts. 19 and 20); \n Interned combatants must not be accommodated in prisons (art. 22); \n Places of internment must be hygienic and healthy places to live. Internees\u2019 quarters must be protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 15 5.40 (conditions must not harm their health). Camps must be kept clean, and proper sanitary measures should be taken to prevent epidemics (arts. 22, 25 and 29); \n Female internees must be accommodated separately from men, and separate dormitories and hygienic supplies should be provided for them (arts. 25 and 29); \n Daily food rations must be sufficient in quantity, quality and variety to keep internees in good health, and their habitual diet must also be taken into account (art. 26); \n Internees must enjoy complete freedom in the exercise of their religion and in the practice of sports and intellectual activities (arts. 34\u201338); \n Internees must be permitted to receive and send letters, as well as individual parcels or collective shipments (e.g., of food, clothing) (arts. 71\u201373); \n Internees\u2019 working conditions should be properly regulated (arts. 49\u201357); \n Internees must have the right to make requests to the authorities interning them regarding their conditions of captivity (art. 78).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -160903,7 +160903,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2592, - "Paragraph": "What are applicable standards under Additional Protocol II? \\n Internees must receive similar treatment to the local civilian population regarding provision of food and drinking water, health and hygiene, and protection against the climate and the dangers of the armed conflict (art. 5[1][b]); \\n They must be allowed to receive individual or collective relief (art. 5[1][c]); \\n They must have freedom to practise their religion (art. 5[1][d]); \\n If made to work, they must have the benefit of working conditions and safeguards similar to those enjoyed by the local civilian population (art. 5[1][e]); \\n They should be allowed to send and receive letters and cards (art. 5[2][b]); \\n Places of internment must not be located close to the combat zone (art. 5[2][c]); \\n Internees must be evacuated under conditions of safety if the internment site becomes exposed to danger arising out of the armed conflict (art. 5[2][c]); \\n Internees are entitled to free medical examinations and treatment (art. 5[2][d]); \\n Internees\u2019 physical or mental health and integrity must not be endangered by any unjustified act or omission (art. 5[2][e]); \\n Women must be accommodated in separate quarters and be under the supervision of women, except where they are accommodated with male family members (art. 5[2][a]); \\n If it is decided to release persons deprived of their liberty, necessary measures must be taken to ensure their safety (art. 5[4]).", + "Paragraph": "What are applicable standards under Additional Protocol II? \n Internees must receive similar treatment to the local civilian population regarding provision of food and drinking water, health and hygiene, and protection against the climate and the dangers of the armed conflict (art. 5[1][b]); \n They must be allowed to receive individual or collective relief (art. 5[1][c]); \n They must have freedom to practise their religion (art. 5[1][d]); \n If made to work, they must have the benefit of working conditions and safeguards similar to those enjoyed by the local civilian population (art. 5[1][e]); \n They should be allowed to send and receive letters and cards (art. 5[2][b]); \n Places of internment must not be located close to the combat zone (art. 5[2][c]); \n Internees must be evacuated under conditions of safety if the internment site becomes exposed to danger arising out of the armed conflict (art. 5[2][c]); \n Internees are entitled to free medical examinations and treatment (art. 5[2][d]); \n Internees\u2019 physical or mental health and integrity must not be endangered by any unjustified act or omission (art. 5[2][e]); \n Women must be accommodated in separate quarters and be under the supervision of women, except where they are accommodated with male family members (art. 5[2][a]); \n If it is decided to release persons deprived of their liberty, necessary measures must be taken to ensure their safety (art. 5[4]).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -160921,7 +160921,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2592, - "Paragraph": "What are applicable standards under Additional Protocol II? \\n Internees must receive similar treatment to the local civilian population regarding provision of food and drinking water, health and hygiene, and protection against the climate and the dangers of the armed conflict (art. 5[1][b]); \\n They must be allowed to receive individual or collective relief (art. 5[1][c]); \\n They must have freedom to practise their religion (art. 5[1][d]); \\n If made to work, they must have the benefit of working conditions and safeguards similar to those enjoyed by the local civilian population (art. 5[1][e]); \\n They should be allowed to send and receive letters and cards (art. 5[2][b]); \\n Places of internment must not be located close to the combat zone (art. 5[2][c]); \\n Internees must be evacuated under conditions of safety if the internment site becomes exposed to danger arising out of the armed conflict (art. 5[2][c]); \\n Internees are entitled to free medical examinations and treatment (art. 5[2][d]); \\n Internees\u2019 physical or mental health and integrity must not be endangered by any unjustified act or omission (art. 5[2][e]); \\n Women must be accommodated in separate quarters and be under the supervision of women, except where they are accommodated with male family members (art. 5[2][a]); \\n If it is decided to release persons deprived of their liberty, necessary measures must be taken to ensure their safety (art. 5[4]).", + "Paragraph": "What are applicable standards under Additional Protocol II? \n Internees must receive similar treatment to the local civilian population regarding provision of food and drinking water, health and hygiene, and protection against the climate and the dangers of the armed conflict (art. 5[1][b]); \n They must be allowed to receive individual or collective relief (art. 5[1][c]); \n They must have freedom to practise their religion (art. 5[1][d]); \n If made to work, they must have the benefit of working conditions and safeguards similar to those enjoyed by the local civilian population (art. 5[1][e]); \n They should be allowed to send and receive letters and cards (art. 5[2][b]); \n Places of internment must not be located close to the combat zone (art. 5[2][c]); \n Internees must be evacuated under conditions of safety if the internment site becomes exposed to danger arising out of the armed conflict (art. 5[2][c]); \n Internees are entitled to free medical examinations and treatment (art. 5[2][d]); \n Internees\u2019 physical or mental health and integrity must not be endangered by any unjustified act or omission (art. 5[2][e]); \n Women must be accommodated in separate quarters and be under the supervision of women, except where they are accommodated with male family members (art. 5[2][a]); \n If it is decided to release persons deprived of their liberty, necessary measures must be taken to ensure their safety (art. 5[4]).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -160932,14 +160932,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Standards of internment", - "Sentence": "\\n Internees must receive similar treatment to the local civilian population regarding provision of food and drinking water, health and hygiene, and protection against the climate and the dangers of the armed conflict (art.", + "Sentence": "\n Internees must receive similar treatment to the local civilian population regarding provision of food and drinking water, health and hygiene, and protection against the climate and the dangers of the armed conflict (art.", "newParagraph": "applicable standard additional protocol ii n internee must receive similar treatment local civilian population regarding provision food drinking water health hygiene protection climate danger armed conflict art 51b n must allowed receive individual collective relief art 51c n must freedom practise religion art 51d n made work must benefit working condition safeguard similar enjoyed local civilian population art 51e n allowed send receive letter card art 52b n place internment must located close combat zone art 52c n internee must evacuated condition safety internment site becomes exposed danger arising armed conflict art 52c n internee entitled free medical examination treatment art 52d n internee physical mental health integrity must endangered unjustified act omission art 52e n woman must accommodated separate quarter supervision woman except accommodated male family member art 52a n decided release person deprived liberty necessary measure must taken ensure safety art 54", "ProcessedSent": "n internee must receive similar treatment local civilian population regarding provision food drinking water health hygiene protection climate danger armed conflict art", "SentID": 8940 }, { "ParagraphID": 2592, - "Paragraph": "What are applicable standards under Additional Protocol II? \\n Internees must receive similar treatment to the local civilian population regarding provision of food and drinking water, health and hygiene, and protection against the climate and the dangers of the armed conflict (art. 5[1][b]); \\n They must be allowed to receive individual or collective relief (art. 5[1][c]); \\n They must have freedom to practise their religion (art. 5[1][d]); \\n If made to work, they must have the benefit of working conditions and safeguards similar to those enjoyed by the local civilian population (art. 5[1][e]); \\n They should be allowed to send and receive letters and cards (art. 5[2][b]); \\n Places of internment must not be located close to the combat zone (art. 5[2][c]); \\n Internees must be evacuated under conditions of safety if the internment site becomes exposed to danger arising out of the armed conflict (art. 5[2][c]); \\n Internees are entitled to free medical examinations and treatment (art. 5[2][d]); \\n Internees\u2019 physical or mental health and integrity must not be endangered by any unjustified act or omission (art. 5[2][e]); \\n Women must be accommodated in separate quarters and be under the supervision of women, except where they are accommodated with male family members (art. 5[2][a]); \\n If it is decided to release persons deprived of their liberty, necessary measures must be taken to ensure their safety (art. 5[4]).", + "Paragraph": "What are applicable standards under Additional Protocol II? \n Internees must receive similar treatment to the local civilian population regarding provision of food and drinking water, health and hygiene, and protection against the climate and the dangers of the armed conflict (art. 5[1][b]); \n They must be allowed to receive individual or collective relief (art. 5[1][c]); \n They must have freedom to practise their religion (art. 5[1][d]); \n If made to work, they must have the benefit of working conditions and safeguards similar to those enjoyed by the local civilian population (art. 5[1][e]); \n They should be allowed to send and receive letters and cards (art. 5[2][b]); \n Places of internment must not be located close to the combat zone (art. 5[2][c]); \n Internees must be evacuated under conditions of safety if the internment site becomes exposed to danger arising out of the armed conflict (art. 5[2][c]); \n Internees are entitled to free medical examinations and treatment (art. 5[2][d]); \n Internees\u2019 physical or mental health and integrity must not be endangered by any unjustified act or omission (art. 5[2][e]); \n Women must be accommodated in separate quarters and be under the supervision of women, except where they are accommodated with male family members (art. 5[2][a]); \n If it is decided to release persons deprived of their liberty, necessary measures must be taken to ensure their safety (art. 5[4]).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -160950,14 +160950,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Standards of internment", - "Sentence": "5[1][b]); \\n They must be allowed to receive individual or collective relief (art.", + "Sentence": "5[1][b]); \n They must be allowed to receive individual or collective relief (art.", "newParagraph": "applicable standard additional protocol ii n internee must receive similar treatment local civilian population regarding provision food drinking water health hygiene protection climate danger armed conflict art 51b n must allowed receive individual collective relief art 51c n must freedom practise religion art 51d n made work must benefit working condition safeguard similar enjoyed local civilian population art 51e n allowed send receive letter card art 52b n place internment must located close combat zone art 52c n internee must evacuated condition safety internment site becomes exposed danger arising armed conflict art 52c n internee entitled free medical examination treatment art 52d n internee physical mental health integrity must endangered unjustified act omission art 52e n woman must accommodated separate quarter supervision woman except accommodated male family member art 52a n decided release person deprived liberty necessary measure must taken ensure safety art 54", "ProcessedSent": "51b n must allowed receive individual collective relief art", "SentID": 8941 }, { "ParagraphID": 2592, - "Paragraph": "What are applicable standards under Additional Protocol II? \\n Internees must receive similar treatment to the local civilian population regarding provision of food and drinking water, health and hygiene, and protection against the climate and the dangers of the armed conflict (art. 5[1][b]); \\n They must be allowed to receive individual or collective relief (art. 5[1][c]); \\n They must have freedom to practise their religion (art. 5[1][d]); \\n If made to work, they must have the benefit of working conditions and safeguards similar to those enjoyed by the local civilian population (art. 5[1][e]); \\n They should be allowed to send and receive letters and cards (art. 5[2][b]); \\n Places of internment must not be located close to the combat zone (art. 5[2][c]); \\n Internees must be evacuated under conditions of safety if the internment site becomes exposed to danger arising out of the armed conflict (art. 5[2][c]); \\n Internees are entitled to free medical examinations and treatment (art. 5[2][d]); \\n Internees\u2019 physical or mental health and integrity must not be endangered by any unjustified act or omission (art. 5[2][e]); \\n Women must be accommodated in separate quarters and be under the supervision of women, except where they are accommodated with male family members (art. 5[2][a]); \\n If it is decided to release persons deprived of their liberty, necessary measures must be taken to ensure their safety (art. 5[4]).", + "Paragraph": "What are applicable standards under Additional Protocol II? \n Internees must receive similar treatment to the local civilian population regarding provision of food and drinking water, health and hygiene, and protection against the climate and the dangers of the armed conflict (art. 5[1][b]); \n They must be allowed to receive individual or collective relief (art. 5[1][c]); \n They must have freedom to practise their religion (art. 5[1][d]); \n If made to work, they must have the benefit of working conditions and safeguards similar to those enjoyed by the local civilian population (art. 5[1][e]); \n They should be allowed to send and receive letters and cards (art. 5[2][b]); \n Places of internment must not be located close to the combat zone (art. 5[2][c]); \n Internees must be evacuated under conditions of safety if the internment site becomes exposed to danger arising out of the armed conflict (art. 5[2][c]); \n Internees are entitled to free medical examinations and treatment (art. 5[2][d]); \n Internees\u2019 physical or mental health and integrity must not be endangered by any unjustified act or omission (art. 5[2][e]); \n Women must be accommodated in separate quarters and be under the supervision of women, except where they are accommodated with male family members (art. 5[2][a]); \n If it is decided to release persons deprived of their liberty, necessary measures must be taken to ensure their safety (art. 5[4]).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -160968,14 +160968,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Standards of internment", - "Sentence": "5[1][c]); \\n They must have freedom to practise their religion (art.", + "Sentence": "5[1][c]); \n They must have freedom to practise their religion (art.", "newParagraph": "applicable standard additional protocol ii n internee must receive similar treatment local civilian population regarding provision food drinking water health hygiene protection climate danger armed conflict art 51b n must allowed receive individual collective relief art 51c n must freedom practise religion art 51d n made work must benefit working condition safeguard similar enjoyed local civilian population art 51e n allowed send receive letter card art 52b n place internment must located close combat zone art 52c n internee must evacuated condition safety internment site becomes exposed danger arising armed conflict art 52c n internee entitled free medical examination treatment art 52d n internee physical mental health integrity must endangered unjustified act omission art 52e n woman must accommodated separate quarter supervision woman except accommodated male family member art 52a n decided release person deprived liberty necessary measure must taken ensure safety art 54", "ProcessedSent": "51c n must freedom practise religion art", "SentID": 8942 }, { "ParagraphID": 2592, - "Paragraph": "What are applicable standards under Additional Protocol II? \\n Internees must receive similar treatment to the local civilian population regarding provision of food and drinking water, health and hygiene, and protection against the climate and the dangers of the armed conflict (art. 5[1][b]); \\n They must be allowed to receive individual or collective relief (art. 5[1][c]); \\n They must have freedom to practise their religion (art. 5[1][d]); \\n If made to work, they must have the benefit of working conditions and safeguards similar to those enjoyed by the local civilian population (art. 5[1][e]); \\n They should be allowed to send and receive letters and cards (art. 5[2][b]); \\n Places of internment must not be located close to the combat zone (art. 5[2][c]); \\n Internees must be evacuated under conditions of safety if the internment site becomes exposed to danger arising out of the armed conflict (art. 5[2][c]); \\n Internees are entitled to free medical examinations and treatment (art. 5[2][d]); \\n Internees\u2019 physical or mental health and integrity must not be endangered by any unjustified act or omission (art. 5[2][e]); \\n Women must be accommodated in separate quarters and be under the supervision of women, except where they are accommodated with male family members (art. 5[2][a]); \\n If it is decided to release persons deprived of their liberty, necessary measures must be taken to ensure their safety (art. 5[4]).", + "Paragraph": "What are applicable standards under Additional Protocol II? \n Internees must receive similar treatment to the local civilian population regarding provision of food and drinking water, health and hygiene, and protection against the climate and the dangers of the armed conflict (art. 5[1][b]); \n They must be allowed to receive individual or collective relief (art. 5[1][c]); \n They must have freedom to practise their religion (art. 5[1][d]); \n If made to work, they must have the benefit of working conditions and safeguards similar to those enjoyed by the local civilian population (art. 5[1][e]); \n They should be allowed to send and receive letters and cards (art. 5[2][b]); \n Places of internment must not be located close to the combat zone (art. 5[2][c]); \n Internees must be evacuated under conditions of safety if the internment site becomes exposed to danger arising out of the armed conflict (art. 5[2][c]); \n Internees are entitled to free medical examinations and treatment (art. 5[2][d]); \n Internees\u2019 physical or mental health and integrity must not be endangered by any unjustified act or omission (art. 5[2][e]); \n Women must be accommodated in separate quarters and be under the supervision of women, except where they are accommodated with male family members (art. 5[2][a]); \n If it is decided to release persons deprived of their liberty, necessary measures must be taken to ensure their safety (art. 5[4]).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -160986,14 +160986,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Standards of internment", - "Sentence": "5[1][d]); \\n If made to work, they must have the benefit of working conditions and safeguards similar to those enjoyed by the local civilian population (art.", + "Sentence": "5[1][d]); \n If made to work, they must have the benefit of working conditions and safeguards similar to those enjoyed by the local civilian population (art.", "newParagraph": "applicable standard additional protocol ii n internee must receive similar treatment local civilian population regarding provision food drinking water health hygiene protection climate danger armed conflict art 51b n must allowed receive individual collective relief art 51c n must freedom practise religion art 51d n made work must benefit working condition safeguard similar enjoyed local civilian population art 51e n allowed send receive letter card art 52b n place internment must located close combat zone art 52c n internee must evacuated condition safety internment site becomes exposed danger arising armed conflict art 52c n internee entitled free medical examination treatment art 52d n internee physical mental health integrity must endangered unjustified act omission art 52e n woman must accommodated separate quarter supervision woman except accommodated male family member art 52a n decided release person deprived liberty necessary measure must taken ensure safety art 54", "ProcessedSent": "51d n made work must benefit working condition safeguard similar enjoyed local civilian population art", "SentID": 8943 }, { "ParagraphID": 2592, - "Paragraph": "What are applicable standards under Additional Protocol II? \\n Internees must receive similar treatment to the local civilian population regarding provision of food and drinking water, health and hygiene, and protection against the climate and the dangers of the armed conflict (art. 5[1][b]); \\n They must be allowed to receive individual or collective relief (art. 5[1][c]); \\n They must have freedom to practise their religion (art. 5[1][d]); \\n If made to work, they must have the benefit of working conditions and safeguards similar to those enjoyed by the local civilian population (art. 5[1][e]); \\n They should be allowed to send and receive letters and cards (art. 5[2][b]); \\n Places of internment must not be located close to the combat zone (art. 5[2][c]); \\n Internees must be evacuated under conditions of safety if the internment site becomes exposed to danger arising out of the armed conflict (art. 5[2][c]); \\n Internees are entitled to free medical examinations and treatment (art. 5[2][d]); \\n Internees\u2019 physical or mental health and integrity must not be endangered by any unjustified act or omission (art. 5[2][e]); \\n Women must be accommodated in separate quarters and be under the supervision of women, except where they are accommodated with male family members (art. 5[2][a]); \\n If it is decided to release persons deprived of their liberty, necessary measures must be taken to ensure their safety (art. 5[4]).", + "Paragraph": "What are applicable standards under Additional Protocol II? \n Internees must receive similar treatment to the local civilian population regarding provision of food and drinking water, health and hygiene, and protection against the climate and the dangers of the armed conflict (art. 5[1][b]); \n They must be allowed to receive individual or collective relief (art. 5[1][c]); \n They must have freedom to practise their religion (art. 5[1][d]); \n If made to work, they must have the benefit of working conditions and safeguards similar to those enjoyed by the local civilian population (art. 5[1][e]); \n They should be allowed to send and receive letters and cards (art. 5[2][b]); \n Places of internment must not be located close to the combat zone (art. 5[2][c]); \n Internees must be evacuated under conditions of safety if the internment site becomes exposed to danger arising out of the armed conflict (art. 5[2][c]); \n Internees are entitled to free medical examinations and treatment (art. 5[2][d]); \n Internees\u2019 physical or mental health and integrity must not be endangered by any unjustified act or omission (art. 5[2][e]); \n Women must be accommodated in separate quarters and be under the supervision of women, except where they are accommodated with male family members (art. 5[2][a]); \n If it is decided to release persons deprived of their liberty, necessary measures must be taken to ensure their safety (art. 5[4]).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161004,14 +161004,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Standards of internment", - "Sentence": "5[1][e]); \\n They should be allowed to send and receive letters and cards (art.", + "Sentence": "5[1][e]); \n They should be allowed to send and receive letters and cards (art.", "newParagraph": "applicable standard additional protocol ii n internee must receive similar treatment local civilian population regarding provision food drinking water health hygiene protection climate danger armed conflict art 51b n must allowed receive individual collective relief art 51c n must freedom practise religion art 51d n made work must benefit working condition safeguard similar enjoyed local civilian population art 51e n allowed send receive letter card art 52b n place internment must located close combat zone art 52c n internee must evacuated condition safety internment site becomes exposed danger arising armed conflict art 52c n internee entitled free medical examination treatment art 52d n internee physical mental health integrity must endangered unjustified act omission art 52e n woman must accommodated separate quarter supervision woman except accommodated male family member art 52a n decided release person deprived liberty necessary measure must taken ensure safety art 54", "ProcessedSent": "51e n allowed send receive letter card art", "SentID": 8944 }, { "ParagraphID": 2592, - "Paragraph": "What are applicable standards under Additional Protocol II? \\n Internees must receive similar treatment to the local civilian population regarding provision of food and drinking water, health and hygiene, and protection against the climate and the dangers of the armed conflict (art. 5[1][b]); \\n They must be allowed to receive individual or collective relief (art. 5[1][c]); \\n They must have freedom to practise their religion (art. 5[1][d]); \\n If made to work, they must have the benefit of working conditions and safeguards similar to those enjoyed by the local civilian population (art. 5[1][e]); \\n They should be allowed to send and receive letters and cards (art. 5[2][b]); \\n Places of internment must not be located close to the combat zone (art. 5[2][c]); \\n Internees must be evacuated under conditions of safety if the internment site becomes exposed to danger arising out of the armed conflict (art. 5[2][c]); \\n Internees are entitled to free medical examinations and treatment (art. 5[2][d]); \\n Internees\u2019 physical or mental health and integrity must not be endangered by any unjustified act or omission (art. 5[2][e]); \\n Women must be accommodated in separate quarters and be under the supervision of women, except where they are accommodated with male family members (art. 5[2][a]); \\n If it is decided to release persons deprived of their liberty, necessary measures must be taken to ensure their safety (art. 5[4]).", + "Paragraph": "What are applicable standards under Additional Protocol II? \n Internees must receive similar treatment to the local civilian population regarding provision of food and drinking water, health and hygiene, and protection against the climate and the dangers of the armed conflict (art. 5[1][b]); \n They must be allowed to receive individual or collective relief (art. 5[1][c]); \n They must have freedom to practise their religion (art. 5[1][d]); \n If made to work, they must have the benefit of working conditions and safeguards similar to those enjoyed by the local civilian population (art. 5[1][e]); \n They should be allowed to send and receive letters and cards (art. 5[2][b]); \n Places of internment must not be located close to the combat zone (art. 5[2][c]); \n Internees must be evacuated under conditions of safety if the internment site becomes exposed to danger arising out of the armed conflict (art. 5[2][c]); \n Internees are entitled to free medical examinations and treatment (art. 5[2][d]); \n Internees\u2019 physical or mental health and integrity must not be endangered by any unjustified act or omission (art. 5[2][e]); \n Women must be accommodated in separate quarters and be under the supervision of women, except where they are accommodated with male family members (art. 5[2][a]); \n If it is decided to release persons deprived of their liberty, necessary measures must be taken to ensure their safety (art. 5[4]).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161022,14 +161022,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Standards of internment", - "Sentence": "5[2][b]); \\n Places of internment must not be located close to the combat zone (art.", + "Sentence": "5[2][b]); \n Places of internment must not be located close to the combat zone (art.", "newParagraph": "applicable standard additional protocol ii n internee must receive similar treatment local civilian population regarding provision food drinking water health hygiene protection climate danger armed conflict art 51b n must allowed receive individual collective relief art 51c n must freedom practise religion art 51d n made work must benefit working condition safeguard similar enjoyed local civilian population art 51e n allowed send receive letter card art 52b n place internment must located close combat zone art 52c n internee must evacuated condition safety internment site becomes exposed danger arising armed conflict art 52c n internee entitled free medical examination treatment art 52d n internee physical mental health integrity must endangered unjustified act omission art 52e n woman must accommodated separate quarter supervision woman except accommodated male family member art 52a n decided release person deprived liberty necessary measure must taken ensure safety art 54", "ProcessedSent": "52b n place internment must located close combat zone art", "SentID": 8945 }, { "ParagraphID": 2592, - "Paragraph": "What are applicable standards under Additional Protocol II? \\n Internees must receive similar treatment to the local civilian population regarding provision of food and drinking water, health and hygiene, and protection against the climate and the dangers of the armed conflict (art. 5[1][b]); \\n They must be allowed to receive individual or collective relief (art. 5[1][c]); \\n They must have freedom to practise their religion (art. 5[1][d]); \\n If made to work, they must have the benefit of working conditions and safeguards similar to those enjoyed by the local civilian population (art. 5[1][e]); \\n They should be allowed to send and receive letters and cards (art. 5[2][b]); \\n Places of internment must not be located close to the combat zone (art. 5[2][c]); \\n Internees must be evacuated under conditions of safety if the internment site becomes exposed to danger arising out of the armed conflict (art. 5[2][c]); \\n Internees are entitled to free medical examinations and treatment (art. 5[2][d]); \\n Internees\u2019 physical or mental health and integrity must not be endangered by any unjustified act or omission (art. 5[2][e]); \\n Women must be accommodated in separate quarters and be under the supervision of women, except where they are accommodated with male family members (art. 5[2][a]); \\n If it is decided to release persons deprived of their liberty, necessary measures must be taken to ensure their safety (art. 5[4]).", + "Paragraph": "What are applicable standards under Additional Protocol II? \n Internees must receive similar treatment to the local civilian population regarding provision of food and drinking water, health and hygiene, and protection against the climate and the dangers of the armed conflict (art. 5[1][b]); \n They must be allowed to receive individual or collective relief (art. 5[1][c]); \n They must have freedom to practise their religion (art. 5[1][d]); \n If made to work, they must have the benefit of working conditions and safeguards similar to those enjoyed by the local civilian population (art. 5[1][e]); \n They should be allowed to send and receive letters and cards (art. 5[2][b]); \n Places of internment must not be located close to the combat zone (art. 5[2][c]); \n Internees must be evacuated under conditions of safety if the internment site becomes exposed to danger arising out of the armed conflict (art. 5[2][c]); \n Internees are entitled to free medical examinations and treatment (art. 5[2][d]); \n Internees\u2019 physical or mental health and integrity must not be endangered by any unjustified act or omission (art. 5[2][e]); \n Women must be accommodated in separate quarters and be under the supervision of women, except where they are accommodated with male family members (art. 5[2][a]); \n If it is decided to release persons deprived of their liberty, necessary measures must be taken to ensure their safety (art. 5[4]).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161040,14 +161040,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Standards of internment", - "Sentence": "5[2][c]); \\n Internees must be evacuated under conditions of safety if the internment site becomes exposed to danger arising out of the armed conflict (art.", + "Sentence": "5[2][c]); \n Internees must be evacuated under conditions of safety if the internment site becomes exposed to danger arising out of the armed conflict (art.", "newParagraph": "applicable standard additional protocol ii n internee must receive similar treatment local civilian population regarding provision food drinking water health hygiene protection climate danger armed conflict art 51b n must allowed receive individual collective relief art 51c n must freedom practise religion art 51d n made work must benefit working condition safeguard similar enjoyed local civilian population art 51e n allowed send receive letter card art 52b n place internment must located close combat zone art 52c n internee must evacuated condition safety internment site becomes exposed danger arising armed conflict art 52c n internee entitled free medical examination treatment art 52d n internee physical mental health integrity must endangered unjustified act omission art 52e n woman must accommodated separate quarter supervision woman except accommodated male family member art 52a n decided release person deprived liberty necessary measure must taken ensure safety art 54", "ProcessedSent": "52c n internee must evacuated condition safety internment site becomes exposed danger arising armed conflict art", "SentID": 8946 }, { "ParagraphID": 2592, - "Paragraph": "What are applicable standards under Additional Protocol II? \\n Internees must receive similar treatment to the local civilian population regarding provision of food and drinking water, health and hygiene, and protection against the climate and the dangers of the armed conflict (art. 5[1][b]); \\n They must be allowed to receive individual or collective relief (art. 5[1][c]); \\n They must have freedom to practise their religion (art. 5[1][d]); \\n If made to work, they must have the benefit of working conditions and safeguards similar to those enjoyed by the local civilian population (art. 5[1][e]); \\n They should be allowed to send and receive letters and cards (art. 5[2][b]); \\n Places of internment must not be located close to the combat zone (art. 5[2][c]); \\n Internees must be evacuated under conditions of safety if the internment site becomes exposed to danger arising out of the armed conflict (art. 5[2][c]); \\n Internees are entitled to free medical examinations and treatment (art. 5[2][d]); \\n Internees\u2019 physical or mental health and integrity must not be endangered by any unjustified act or omission (art. 5[2][e]); \\n Women must be accommodated in separate quarters and be under the supervision of women, except where they are accommodated with male family members (art. 5[2][a]); \\n If it is decided to release persons deprived of their liberty, necessary measures must be taken to ensure their safety (art. 5[4]).", + "Paragraph": "What are applicable standards under Additional Protocol II? \n Internees must receive similar treatment to the local civilian population regarding provision of food and drinking water, health and hygiene, and protection against the climate and the dangers of the armed conflict (art. 5[1][b]); \n They must be allowed to receive individual or collective relief (art. 5[1][c]); \n They must have freedom to practise their religion (art. 5[1][d]); \n If made to work, they must have the benefit of working conditions and safeguards similar to those enjoyed by the local civilian population (art. 5[1][e]); \n They should be allowed to send and receive letters and cards (art. 5[2][b]); \n Places of internment must not be located close to the combat zone (art. 5[2][c]); \n Internees must be evacuated under conditions of safety if the internment site becomes exposed to danger arising out of the armed conflict (art. 5[2][c]); \n Internees are entitled to free medical examinations and treatment (art. 5[2][d]); \n Internees\u2019 physical or mental health and integrity must not be endangered by any unjustified act or omission (art. 5[2][e]); \n Women must be accommodated in separate quarters and be under the supervision of women, except where they are accommodated with male family members (art. 5[2][a]); \n If it is decided to release persons deprived of their liberty, necessary measures must be taken to ensure their safety (art. 5[4]).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161058,14 +161058,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Standards of internment", - "Sentence": "5[2][c]); \\n Internees are entitled to free medical examinations and treatment (art.", + "Sentence": "5[2][c]); \n Internees are entitled to free medical examinations and treatment (art.", "newParagraph": "applicable standard additional protocol ii n internee must receive similar treatment local civilian population regarding provision food drinking water health hygiene protection climate danger armed conflict art 51b n must allowed receive individual collective relief art 51c n must freedom practise religion art 51d n made work must benefit working condition safeguard similar enjoyed local civilian population art 51e n allowed send receive letter card art 52b n place internment must located close combat zone art 52c n internee must evacuated condition safety internment site becomes exposed danger arising armed conflict art 52c n internee entitled free medical examination treatment art 52d n internee physical mental health integrity must endangered unjustified act omission art 52e n woman must accommodated separate quarter supervision woman except accommodated male family member art 52a n decided release person deprived liberty necessary measure must taken ensure safety art 54", "ProcessedSent": "52c n internee entitled free medical examination treatment art", "SentID": 8947 }, { "ParagraphID": 2592, - "Paragraph": "What are applicable standards under Additional Protocol II? \\n Internees must receive similar treatment to the local civilian population regarding provision of food and drinking water, health and hygiene, and protection against the climate and the dangers of the armed conflict (art. 5[1][b]); \\n They must be allowed to receive individual or collective relief (art. 5[1][c]); \\n They must have freedom to practise their religion (art. 5[1][d]); \\n If made to work, they must have the benefit of working conditions and safeguards similar to those enjoyed by the local civilian population (art. 5[1][e]); \\n They should be allowed to send and receive letters and cards (art. 5[2][b]); \\n Places of internment must not be located close to the combat zone (art. 5[2][c]); \\n Internees must be evacuated under conditions of safety if the internment site becomes exposed to danger arising out of the armed conflict (art. 5[2][c]); \\n Internees are entitled to free medical examinations and treatment (art. 5[2][d]); \\n Internees\u2019 physical or mental health and integrity must not be endangered by any unjustified act or omission (art. 5[2][e]); \\n Women must be accommodated in separate quarters and be under the supervision of women, except where they are accommodated with male family members (art. 5[2][a]); \\n If it is decided to release persons deprived of their liberty, necessary measures must be taken to ensure their safety (art. 5[4]).", + "Paragraph": "What are applicable standards under Additional Protocol II? \n Internees must receive similar treatment to the local civilian population regarding provision of food and drinking water, health and hygiene, and protection against the climate and the dangers of the armed conflict (art. 5[1][b]); \n They must be allowed to receive individual or collective relief (art. 5[1][c]); \n They must have freedom to practise their religion (art. 5[1][d]); \n If made to work, they must have the benefit of working conditions and safeguards similar to those enjoyed by the local civilian population (art. 5[1][e]); \n They should be allowed to send and receive letters and cards (art. 5[2][b]); \n Places of internment must not be located close to the combat zone (art. 5[2][c]); \n Internees must be evacuated under conditions of safety if the internment site becomes exposed to danger arising out of the armed conflict (art. 5[2][c]); \n Internees are entitled to free medical examinations and treatment (art. 5[2][d]); \n Internees\u2019 physical or mental health and integrity must not be endangered by any unjustified act or omission (art. 5[2][e]); \n Women must be accommodated in separate quarters and be under the supervision of women, except where they are accommodated with male family members (art. 5[2][a]); \n If it is decided to release persons deprived of their liberty, necessary measures must be taken to ensure their safety (art. 5[4]).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161076,14 +161076,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Standards of internment", - "Sentence": "5[2][d]); \\n Internees\u2019 physical or mental health and integrity must not be endangered by any unjustified act or omission (art.", + "Sentence": "5[2][d]); \n Internees\u2019 physical or mental health and integrity must not be endangered by any unjustified act or omission (art.", "newParagraph": "applicable standard additional protocol ii n internee must receive similar treatment local civilian population regarding provision food drinking water health hygiene protection climate danger armed conflict art 51b n must allowed receive individual collective relief art 51c n must freedom practise religion art 51d n made work must benefit working condition safeguard similar enjoyed local civilian population art 51e n allowed send receive letter card art 52b n place internment must located close combat zone art 52c n internee must evacuated condition safety internment site becomes exposed danger arising armed conflict art 52c n internee entitled free medical examination treatment art 52d n internee physical mental health integrity must endangered unjustified act omission art 52e n woman must accommodated separate quarter supervision woman except accommodated male family member art 52a n decided release person deprived liberty necessary measure must taken ensure safety art 54", "ProcessedSent": "52d n internee physical mental health integrity must endangered unjustified act omission art", "SentID": 8948 }, { "ParagraphID": 2592, - "Paragraph": "What are applicable standards under Additional Protocol II? \\n Internees must receive similar treatment to the local civilian population regarding provision of food and drinking water, health and hygiene, and protection against the climate and the dangers of the armed conflict (art. 5[1][b]); \\n They must be allowed to receive individual or collective relief (art. 5[1][c]); \\n They must have freedom to practise their religion (art. 5[1][d]); \\n If made to work, they must have the benefit of working conditions and safeguards similar to those enjoyed by the local civilian population (art. 5[1][e]); \\n They should be allowed to send and receive letters and cards (art. 5[2][b]); \\n Places of internment must not be located close to the combat zone (art. 5[2][c]); \\n Internees must be evacuated under conditions of safety if the internment site becomes exposed to danger arising out of the armed conflict (art. 5[2][c]); \\n Internees are entitled to free medical examinations and treatment (art. 5[2][d]); \\n Internees\u2019 physical or mental health and integrity must not be endangered by any unjustified act or omission (art. 5[2][e]); \\n Women must be accommodated in separate quarters and be under the supervision of women, except where they are accommodated with male family members (art. 5[2][a]); \\n If it is decided to release persons deprived of their liberty, necessary measures must be taken to ensure their safety (art. 5[4]).", + "Paragraph": "What are applicable standards under Additional Protocol II? \n Internees must receive similar treatment to the local civilian population regarding provision of food and drinking water, health and hygiene, and protection against the climate and the dangers of the armed conflict (art. 5[1][b]); \n They must be allowed to receive individual or collective relief (art. 5[1][c]); \n They must have freedom to practise their religion (art. 5[1][d]); \n If made to work, they must have the benefit of working conditions and safeguards similar to those enjoyed by the local civilian population (art. 5[1][e]); \n They should be allowed to send and receive letters and cards (art. 5[2][b]); \n Places of internment must not be located close to the combat zone (art. 5[2][c]); \n Internees must be evacuated under conditions of safety if the internment site becomes exposed to danger arising out of the armed conflict (art. 5[2][c]); \n Internees are entitled to free medical examinations and treatment (art. 5[2][d]); \n Internees\u2019 physical or mental health and integrity must not be endangered by any unjustified act or omission (art. 5[2][e]); \n Women must be accommodated in separate quarters and be under the supervision of women, except where they are accommodated with male family members (art. 5[2][a]); \n If it is decided to release persons deprived of their liberty, necessary measures must be taken to ensure their safety (art. 5[4]).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161094,14 +161094,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Standards of internment", - "Sentence": "5[2][e]); \\n Women must be accommodated in separate quarters and be under the supervision of women, except where they are accommodated with male family members (art.", + "Sentence": "5[2][e]); \n Women must be accommodated in separate quarters and be under the supervision of women, except where they are accommodated with male family members (art.", "newParagraph": "applicable standard additional protocol ii n internee must receive similar treatment local civilian population regarding provision food drinking water health hygiene protection climate danger armed conflict art 51b n must allowed receive individual collective relief art 51c n must freedom practise religion art 51d n made work must benefit working condition safeguard similar enjoyed local civilian population art 51e n allowed send receive letter card art 52b n place internment must located close combat zone art 52c n internee must evacuated condition safety internment site becomes exposed danger arising armed conflict art 52c n internee entitled free medical examination treatment art 52d n internee physical mental health integrity must endangered unjustified act omission art 52e n woman must accommodated separate quarter supervision woman except accommodated male family member art 52a n decided release person deprived liberty necessary measure must taken ensure safety art 54", "ProcessedSent": "52e n woman must accommodated separate quarter supervision woman except accommodated male family member art", "SentID": 8949 }, { "ParagraphID": 2592, - "Paragraph": "What are applicable standards under Additional Protocol II? \\n Internees must receive similar treatment to the local civilian population regarding provision of food and drinking water, health and hygiene, and protection against the climate and the dangers of the armed conflict (art. 5[1][b]); \\n They must be allowed to receive individual or collective relief (art. 5[1][c]); \\n They must have freedom to practise their religion (art. 5[1][d]); \\n If made to work, they must have the benefit of working conditions and safeguards similar to those enjoyed by the local civilian population (art. 5[1][e]); \\n They should be allowed to send and receive letters and cards (art. 5[2][b]); \\n Places of internment must not be located close to the combat zone (art. 5[2][c]); \\n Internees must be evacuated under conditions of safety if the internment site becomes exposed to danger arising out of the armed conflict (art. 5[2][c]); \\n Internees are entitled to free medical examinations and treatment (art. 5[2][d]); \\n Internees\u2019 physical or mental health and integrity must not be endangered by any unjustified act or omission (art. 5[2][e]); \\n Women must be accommodated in separate quarters and be under the supervision of women, except where they are accommodated with male family members (art. 5[2][a]); \\n If it is decided to release persons deprived of their liberty, necessary measures must be taken to ensure their safety (art. 5[4]).", + "Paragraph": "What are applicable standards under Additional Protocol II? \n Internees must receive similar treatment to the local civilian population regarding provision of food and drinking water, health and hygiene, and protection against the climate and the dangers of the armed conflict (art. 5[1][b]); \n They must be allowed to receive individual or collective relief (art. 5[1][c]); \n They must have freedom to practise their religion (art. 5[1][d]); \n If made to work, they must have the benefit of working conditions and safeguards similar to those enjoyed by the local civilian population (art. 5[1][e]); \n They should be allowed to send and receive letters and cards (art. 5[2][b]); \n Places of internment must not be located close to the combat zone (art. 5[2][c]); \n Internees must be evacuated under conditions of safety if the internment site becomes exposed to danger arising out of the armed conflict (art. 5[2][c]); \n Internees are entitled to free medical examinations and treatment (art. 5[2][d]); \n Internees\u2019 physical or mental health and integrity must not be endangered by any unjustified act or omission (art. 5[2][e]); \n Women must be accommodated in separate quarters and be under the supervision of women, except where they are accommodated with male family members (art. 5[2][a]); \n If it is decided to release persons deprived of their liberty, necessary measures must be taken to ensure their safety (art. 5[4]).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161112,14 +161112,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Standards of internment", - "Sentence": "5[2][a]); \\n If it is decided to release persons deprived of their liberty, necessary measures must be taken to ensure their safety (art.", + "Sentence": "5[2][a]); \n If it is decided to release persons deprived of their liberty, necessary measures must be taken to ensure their safety (art.", "newParagraph": "applicable standard additional protocol ii n internee must receive similar treatment local civilian population regarding provision food drinking water health hygiene protection climate danger armed conflict art 51b n must allowed receive individual collective relief art 51c n must freedom practise religion art 51d n made work must benefit working condition safeguard similar enjoyed local civilian population art 51e n allowed send receive letter card art 52b n place internment must located close combat zone art 52c n internee must evacuated condition safety internment site becomes exposed danger arising armed conflict art 52c n internee entitled free medical examination treatment art 52d n internee physical mental health integrity must endangered unjustified act omission art 52e n woman must accommodated separate quarter supervision woman except accommodated male family member art 52a n decided release person deprived liberty necessary measure must taken ensure safety art 54", "ProcessedSent": "52a n decided release person deprived liberty necessary measure must taken ensure safety art", "SentID": 8950 }, { "ParagraphID": 2592, - "Paragraph": "What are applicable standards under Additional Protocol II? \\n Internees must receive similar treatment to the local civilian population regarding provision of food and drinking water, health and hygiene, and protection against the climate and the dangers of the armed conflict (art. 5[1][b]); \\n They must be allowed to receive individual or collective relief (art. 5[1][c]); \\n They must have freedom to practise their religion (art. 5[1][d]); \\n If made to work, they must have the benefit of working conditions and safeguards similar to those enjoyed by the local civilian population (art. 5[1][e]); \\n They should be allowed to send and receive letters and cards (art. 5[2][b]); \\n Places of internment must not be located close to the combat zone (art. 5[2][c]); \\n Internees must be evacuated under conditions of safety if the internment site becomes exposed to danger arising out of the armed conflict (art. 5[2][c]); \\n Internees are entitled to free medical examinations and treatment (art. 5[2][d]); \\n Internees\u2019 physical or mental health and integrity must not be endangered by any unjustified act or omission (art. 5[2][e]); \\n Women must be accommodated in separate quarters and be under the supervision of women, except where they are accommodated with male family members (art. 5[2][a]); \\n If it is decided to release persons deprived of their liberty, necessary measures must be taken to ensure their safety (art. 5[4]).", + "Paragraph": "What are applicable standards under Additional Protocol II? \n Internees must receive similar treatment to the local civilian population regarding provision of food and drinking water, health and hygiene, and protection against the climate and the dangers of the armed conflict (art. 5[1][b]); \n They must be allowed to receive individual or collective relief (art. 5[1][c]); \n They must have freedom to practise their religion (art. 5[1][d]); \n If made to work, they must have the benefit of working conditions and safeguards similar to those enjoyed by the local civilian population (art. 5[1][e]); \n They should be allowed to send and receive letters and cards (art. 5[2][b]); \n Places of internment must not be located close to the combat zone (art. 5[2][c]); \n Internees must be evacuated under conditions of safety if the internment site becomes exposed to danger arising out of the armed conflict (art. 5[2][c]); \n Internees are entitled to free medical examinations and treatment (art. 5[2][d]); \n Internees\u2019 physical or mental health and integrity must not be endangered by any unjustified act or omission (art. 5[2][e]); \n Women must be accommodated in separate quarters and be under the supervision of women, except where they are accommodated with male family members (art. 5[2][a]); \n If it is decided to release persons deprived of their liberty, necessary measures must be taken to ensure their safety (art. 5[4]).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161137,7 +161137,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2593, - "Paragraph": "At least at the early stages of setting up and managing an internment camp, it is likely that host governments will lack capacity and resources for the task. International agencies have an important role to play in acquiring and supplying resources in order to assist the host government to provide internees with the \u201crelief required by humanity\u201d (as required under the Hague Convention): \\n In collaboration with the host government, international agencies should assist with awareness\u00adraising and lobbying of donors, which should take place as soon as possible, as donor funding often takes time to be made available. Donors should be informed about the resource needed to separate and intern combatants and the benefits of such policies, e.g., maintaining State security, helping the host government to keep borders open for asylum seekers, etc.; \\n International agencies should favourably consider contributing financial grants, mate\u00ad rial and other assistance to internment programmes, especially in the early phases when the host government will not have donor funding for such programmes. Contributing assistance, even on an ad hoc and temporary basis, will make international agencies\u2019 advocacy and advisory roles more effective. The following are some illustrations of ways in which international agencies can contribute:", + "Paragraph": "At least at the early stages of setting up and managing an internment camp, it is likely that host governments will lack capacity and resources for the task. International agencies have an important role to play in acquiring and supplying resources in order to assist the host government to provide internees with the \u201crelief required by humanity\u201d (as required under the Hague Convention): \n In collaboration with the host government, international agencies should assist with awareness\u00adraising and lobbying of donors, which should take place as soon as possible, as donor funding often takes time to be made available. Donors should be informed about the resource needed to separate and intern combatants and the benefits of such policies, e.g., maintaining State security, helping the host government to keep borders open for asylum seekers, etc.; \n International agencies should favourably consider contributing financial grants, mate\u00ad rial and other assistance to internment programmes, especially in the early phases when the host government will not have donor funding for such programmes. Contributing assistance, even on an ad hoc and temporary basis, will make international agencies\u2019 advocacy and advisory roles more effective. The following are some illustrations of ways in which international agencies can contribute:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161155,7 +161155,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2593, - "Paragraph": "At least at the early stages of setting up and managing an internment camp, it is likely that host governments will lack capacity and resources for the task. International agencies have an important role to play in acquiring and supplying resources in order to assist the host government to provide internees with the \u201crelief required by humanity\u201d (as required under the Hague Convention): \\n In collaboration with the host government, international agencies should assist with awareness\u00adraising and lobbying of donors, which should take place as soon as possible, as donor funding often takes time to be made available. Donors should be informed about the resource needed to separate and intern combatants and the benefits of such policies, e.g., maintaining State security, helping the host government to keep borders open for asylum seekers, etc.; \\n International agencies should favourably consider contributing financial grants, mate\u00ad rial and other assistance to internment programmes, especially in the early phases when the host government will not have donor funding for such programmes. Contributing assistance, even on an ad hoc and temporary basis, will make international agencies\u2019 advocacy and advisory roles more effective. The following are some illustrations of ways in which international agencies can contribute:", + "Paragraph": "At least at the early stages of setting up and managing an internment camp, it is likely that host governments will lack capacity and resources for the task. International agencies have an important role to play in acquiring and supplying resources in order to assist the host government to provide internees with the \u201crelief required by humanity\u201d (as required under the Hague Convention): \n In collaboration with the host government, international agencies should assist with awareness\u00adraising and lobbying of donors, which should take place as soon as possible, as donor funding often takes time to be made available. Donors should be informed about the resource needed to separate and intern combatants and the benefits of such policies, e.g., maintaining State security, helping the host government to keep borders open for asylum seekers, etc.; \n International agencies should favourably consider contributing financial grants, mate\u00ad rial and other assistance to internment programmes, especially in the early phases when the host government will not have donor funding for such programmes. Contributing assistance, even on an ad hoc and temporary basis, will make international agencies\u2019 advocacy and advisory roles more effective. The following are some illustrations of ways in which international agencies can contribute:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161166,14 +161166,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Assistance by the international community", - "Sentence": "International agencies have an important role to play in acquiring and supplying resources in order to assist the host government to provide internees with the \u201crelief required by humanity\u201d (as required under the Hague Convention): \\n In collaboration with the host government, international agencies should assist with awareness\u00adraising and lobbying of donors, which should take place as soon as possible, as donor funding often takes time to be made available.", + "Sentence": "International agencies have an important role to play in acquiring and supplying resources in order to assist the host government to provide internees with the \u201crelief required by humanity\u201d (as required under the Hague Convention): \n In collaboration with the host government, international agencies should assist with awareness\u00adraising and lobbying of donors, which should take place as soon as possible, as donor funding often takes time to be made available.", "newParagraph": "least early stage setting managing internment camp likely host government lack capacity resource task international agency important role play acquiring supplying resource order assist host government provide internee relief required humanity required hague convention n collaboration host government international agency assist awareness raising lobbying donor take place soon possible donor funding often take time made available donor informed resource needed separate intern combatant benefit policy eg maintaining state security helping host government keep border open asylum seeker etc n international agency favourably consider contributing financial grant mate rial assistance internment programme especially early phase host government donor funding programme contributing assistance even ad hoc temporary basis make international agency advocacy advisory role effective following illustration way international agency contribute", "ProcessedSent": "international agency important role play acquiring supplying resource order assist host government provide internee relief required humanity required hague convention n collaboration host government international agency assist awareness raising lobbying donor take place soon possible donor funding often take time made available", "SentID": 8953 }, { "ParagraphID": 2593, - "Paragraph": "At least at the early stages of setting up and managing an internment camp, it is likely that host governments will lack capacity and resources for the task. International agencies have an important role to play in acquiring and supplying resources in order to assist the host government to provide internees with the \u201crelief required by humanity\u201d (as required under the Hague Convention): \\n In collaboration with the host government, international agencies should assist with awareness\u00adraising and lobbying of donors, which should take place as soon as possible, as donor funding often takes time to be made available. Donors should be informed about the resource needed to separate and intern combatants and the benefits of such policies, e.g., maintaining State security, helping the host government to keep borders open for asylum seekers, etc.; \\n International agencies should favourably consider contributing financial grants, mate\u00ad rial and other assistance to internment programmes, especially in the early phases when the host government will not have donor funding for such programmes. Contributing assistance, even on an ad hoc and temporary basis, will make international agencies\u2019 advocacy and advisory roles more effective. The following are some illustrations of ways in which international agencies can contribute:", + "Paragraph": "At least at the early stages of setting up and managing an internment camp, it is likely that host governments will lack capacity and resources for the task. International agencies have an important role to play in acquiring and supplying resources in order to assist the host government to provide internees with the \u201crelief required by humanity\u201d (as required under the Hague Convention): \n In collaboration with the host government, international agencies should assist with awareness\u00adraising and lobbying of donors, which should take place as soon as possible, as donor funding often takes time to be made available. Donors should be informed about the resource needed to separate and intern combatants and the benefits of such policies, e.g., maintaining State security, helping the host government to keep borders open for asylum seekers, etc.; \n International agencies should favourably consider contributing financial grants, mate\u00ad rial and other assistance to internment programmes, especially in the early phases when the host government will not have donor funding for such programmes. Contributing assistance, even on an ad hoc and temporary basis, will make international agencies\u2019 advocacy and advisory roles more effective. The following are some illustrations of ways in which international agencies can contribute:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161191,7 +161191,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2593, - "Paragraph": "At least at the early stages of setting up and managing an internment camp, it is likely that host governments will lack capacity and resources for the task. International agencies have an important role to play in acquiring and supplying resources in order to assist the host government to provide internees with the \u201crelief required by humanity\u201d (as required under the Hague Convention): \\n In collaboration with the host government, international agencies should assist with awareness\u00adraising and lobbying of donors, which should take place as soon as possible, as donor funding often takes time to be made available. Donors should be informed about the resource needed to separate and intern combatants and the benefits of such policies, e.g., maintaining State security, helping the host government to keep borders open for asylum seekers, etc.; \\n International agencies should favourably consider contributing financial grants, mate\u00ad rial and other assistance to internment programmes, especially in the early phases when the host government will not have donor funding for such programmes. Contributing assistance, even on an ad hoc and temporary basis, will make international agencies\u2019 advocacy and advisory roles more effective. The following are some illustrations of ways in which international agencies can contribute:", + "Paragraph": "At least at the early stages of setting up and managing an internment camp, it is likely that host governments will lack capacity and resources for the task. International agencies have an important role to play in acquiring and supplying resources in order to assist the host government to provide internees with the \u201crelief required by humanity\u201d (as required under the Hague Convention): \n In collaboration with the host government, international agencies should assist with awareness\u00adraising and lobbying of donors, which should take place as soon as possible, as donor funding often takes time to be made available. Donors should be informed about the resource needed to separate and intern combatants and the benefits of such policies, e.g., maintaining State security, helping the host government to keep borders open for asylum seekers, etc.; \n International agencies should favourably consider contributing financial grants, mate\u00ad rial and other assistance to internment programmes, especially in the early phases when the host government will not have donor funding for such programmes. Contributing assistance, even on an ad hoc and temporary basis, will make international agencies\u2019 advocacy and advisory roles more effective. The following are some illustrations of ways in which international agencies can contribute:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161202,14 +161202,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Assistance by the international community", - "Sentence": "; \\n International agencies should favourably consider contributing financial grants, mate\u00ad rial and other assistance to internment programmes, especially in the early phases when the host government will not have donor funding for such programmes.", + "Sentence": "; \n International agencies should favourably consider contributing financial grants, mate\u00ad rial and other assistance to internment programmes, especially in the early phases when the host government will not have donor funding for such programmes.", "newParagraph": "least early stage setting managing internment camp likely host government lack capacity resource task international agency important role play acquiring supplying resource order assist host government provide internee relief required humanity required hague convention n collaboration host government international agency assist awareness raising lobbying donor take place soon possible donor funding often take time made available donor informed resource needed separate intern combatant benefit policy eg maintaining state security helping host government keep border open asylum seeker etc n international agency favourably consider contributing financial grant mate rial assistance internment programme especially early phase host government donor funding programme contributing assistance even ad hoc temporary basis make international agency advocacy advisory role effective following illustration way international agency contribute", "ProcessedSent": " n international agency favourably consider contributing financial grant mate rial assistance internment programme especially early phase host government donor funding programme", "SentID": 8955 }, { "ParagraphID": 2593, - "Paragraph": "At least at the early stages of setting up and managing an internment camp, it is likely that host governments will lack capacity and resources for the task. International agencies have an important role to play in acquiring and supplying resources in order to assist the host government to provide internees with the \u201crelief required by humanity\u201d (as required under the Hague Convention): \\n In collaboration with the host government, international agencies should assist with awareness\u00adraising and lobbying of donors, which should take place as soon as possible, as donor funding often takes time to be made available. Donors should be informed about the resource needed to separate and intern combatants and the benefits of such policies, e.g., maintaining State security, helping the host government to keep borders open for asylum seekers, etc.; \\n International agencies should favourably consider contributing financial grants, mate\u00ad rial and other assistance to internment programmes, especially in the early phases when the host government will not have donor funding for such programmes. Contributing assistance, even on an ad hoc and temporary basis, will make international agencies\u2019 advocacy and advisory roles more effective. The following are some illustrations of ways in which international agencies can contribute:", + "Paragraph": "At least at the early stages of setting up and managing an internment camp, it is likely that host governments will lack capacity and resources for the task. International agencies have an important role to play in acquiring and supplying resources in order to assist the host government to provide internees with the \u201crelief required by humanity\u201d (as required under the Hague Convention): \n In collaboration with the host government, international agencies should assist with awareness\u00adraising and lobbying of donors, which should take place as soon as possible, as donor funding often takes time to be made available. Donors should be informed about the resource needed to separate and intern combatants and the benefits of such policies, e.g., maintaining State security, helping the host government to keep borders open for asylum seekers, etc.; \n International agencies should favourably consider contributing financial grants, mate\u00ad rial and other assistance to internment programmes, especially in the early phases when the host government will not have donor funding for such programmes. Contributing assistance, even on an ad hoc and temporary basis, will make international agencies\u2019 advocacy and advisory roles more effective. The following are some illustrations of ways in which international agencies can contribute:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161227,7 +161227,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2593, - "Paragraph": "At least at the early stages of setting up and managing an internment camp, it is likely that host governments will lack capacity and resources for the task. International agencies have an important role to play in acquiring and supplying resources in order to assist the host government to provide internees with the \u201crelief required by humanity\u201d (as required under the Hague Convention): \\n In collaboration with the host government, international agencies should assist with awareness\u00adraising and lobbying of donors, which should take place as soon as possible, as donor funding often takes time to be made available. Donors should be informed about the resource needed to separate and intern combatants and the benefits of such policies, e.g., maintaining State security, helping the host government to keep borders open for asylum seekers, etc.; \\n International agencies should favourably consider contributing financial grants, mate\u00ad rial and other assistance to internment programmes, especially in the early phases when the host government will not have donor funding for such programmes. Contributing assistance, even on an ad hoc and temporary basis, will make international agencies\u2019 advocacy and advisory roles more effective. The following are some illustrations of ways in which international agencies can contribute:", + "Paragraph": "At least at the early stages of setting up and managing an internment camp, it is likely that host governments will lack capacity and resources for the task. International agencies have an important role to play in acquiring and supplying resources in order to assist the host government to provide internees with the \u201crelief required by humanity\u201d (as required under the Hague Convention): \n In collaboration with the host government, international agencies should assist with awareness\u00adraising and lobbying of donors, which should take place as soon as possible, as donor funding often takes time to be made available. Donors should be informed about the resource needed to separate and intern combatants and the benefits of such policies, e.g., maintaining State security, helping the host government to keep borders open for asylum seekers, etc.; \n International agencies should favourably consider contributing financial grants, mate\u00ad rial and other assistance to internment programmes, especially in the early phases when the host government will not have donor funding for such programmes. Contributing assistance, even on an ad hoc and temporary basis, will make international agencies\u2019 advocacy and advisory roles more effective. The following are some illustrations of ways in which international agencies can contribute:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161245,7 +161245,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2594, - "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \\n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \\n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \\n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \\n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \\n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \\n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \\n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \\n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", + "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161263,7 +161263,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2594, - "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \\n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \\n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \\n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \\n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \\n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \\n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \\n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \\n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", + "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161281,7 +161281,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2594, - "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \\n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \\n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \\n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \\n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \\n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \\n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \\n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \\n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", + "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161299,7 +161299,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2594, - "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \\n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \\n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \\n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \\n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \\n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \\n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \\n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \\n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", + "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161310,14 +161310,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Assistance by the international community", - "Sentence": "\\n Health care.", + "Sentence": "\n Health care.", "newParagraph": "food wfp may assist providing food given inability internee feed restricted freedom movement internee entitled full food ration least 2100 kilocalorie per day n health care international agency partner eg local red cross society may able provide mobile health clinic supplement hospital treatment serious medical matter medical care include reproductive health care female internee n nonfood item item plastic sheeting plate bucket blanket sleeping mat soap etc needed internee agency contribution essential agency unhcr icrc resource may able give extra assistance least temporarily government receives regular donor funding internment initiative n registration documentation agency could help host government develop system registration issuing identity documentation agency often need data eg icrc order arrange family tracing family visit unhcr purpose getting information profile internee may later come within mandate later stage internee apply refugee status icrc may issue documentation internee connection detentionmonitoring role n skill training combat problem idleness provide rehabilitation alternative skill internee well maintain order dignity internment agency partner must try providefund vocational skill training programme soon possible order demobilization reintegration start internment camp essential skill training programme could help internee become rehabilitated social skill training would also helpful sensitization human right civic education peacebuilding hivaids sexual genderbased violence n recreation sufficient space recreation sporting equipment provided purpose recreation n reestablishing family link icrc together national society try trace family member internee across border within host country allow family link reestablished maintained eg exchange red cross message civilian family member also crossed host country arrangement made maintaining family unity various option family could accommodated internment camp separate nearby facility refugee camp settlement family member voluntarily accommodated level 5 crosscutting issue crossborder population movement 17 540 together near internee advantage preserving family unity helping break military hierarchy internment camp reducing risk localrefugee community retaliation family member account connection combatant minimizing chance combatant moving civilian site order family member however family member may face security risk including physical violence sexual harassment internee civilian spouse child accommodated internee regular adequate family visit internment camp must arranged icrc unhcr relevant agency n monitoring icrc able carry regular confidential monitoring internment camp including treatment internee standard internment accordance mandate person deprived liberty reason related armed conflict report monitoring visit provided confidential basis government host country n host community involvement support host community vital internment process therefore agency consider providing host community communitybased development assistance programme", "ProcessedSent": "n health care", "SentID": 8961 }, { "ParagraphID": 2594, - "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \\n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \\n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \\n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \\n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \\n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \\n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \\n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \\n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", + "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161335,7 +161335,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2594, - "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \\n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \\n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \\n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \\n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \\n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \\n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \\n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \\n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", + "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161353,7 +161353,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2594, - "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \\n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \\n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \\n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \\n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \\n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \\n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \\n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \\n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", + "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161364,14 +161364,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Assistance by the international community", - "Sentence": "\\n Non-food items.", + "Sentence": "\n Non-food items.", "newParagraph": "food wfp may assist providing food given inability internee feed restricted freedom movement internee entitled full food ration least 2100 kilocalorie per day n health care international agency partner eg local red cross society may able provide mobile health clinic supplement hospital treatment serious medical matter medical care include reproductive health care female internee n nonfood item item plastic sheeting plate bucket blanket sleeping mat soap etc needed internee agency contribution essential agency unhcr icrc resource may able give extra assistance least temporarily government receives regular donor funding internment initiative n registration documentation agency could help host government develop system registration issuing identity documentation agency often need data eg icrc order arrange family tracing family visit unhcr purpose getting information profile internee may later come within mandate later stage internee apply refugee status icrc may issue documentation internee connection detentionmonitoring role n skill training combat problem idleness provide rehabilitation alternative skill internee well maintain order dignity internment agency partner must try providefund vocational skill training programme soon possible order demobilization reintegration start internment camp essential skill training programme could help internee become rehabilitated social skill training would also helpful sensitization human right civic education peacebuilding hivaids sexual genderbased violence n recreation sufficient space recreation sporting equipment provided purpose recreation n reestablishing family link icrc together national society try trace family member internee across border within host country allow family link reestablished maintained eg exchange red cross message civilian family member also crossed host country arrangement made maintaining family unity various option family could accommodated internment camp separate nearby facility refugee camp settlement family member voluntarily accommodated level 5 crosscutting issue crossborder population movement 17 540 together near internee advantage preserving family unity helping break military hierarchy internment camp reducing risk localrefugee community retaliation family member account connection combatant minimizing chance combatant moving civilian site order family member however family member may face security risk including physical violence sexual harassment internee civilian spouse child accommodated internee regular adequate family visit internment camp must arranged icrc unhcr relevant agency n monitoring icrc able carry regular confidential monitoring internment camp including treatment internee standard internment accordance mandate person deprived liberty reason related armed conflict report monitoring visit provided confidential basis government host country n host community involvement support host community vital internment process therefore agency consider providing host community communitybased development assistance programme", "ProcessedSent": "n nonfood item", "SentID": 8964 }, { "ParagraphID": 2594, - "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \\n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \\n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \\n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \\n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \\n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \\n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \\n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \\n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", + "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161389,7 +161389,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2594, - "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \\n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \\n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \\n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \\n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \\n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \\n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \\n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \\n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", + "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161407,7 +161407,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2594, - "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \\n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \\n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \\n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \\n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \\n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \\n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \\n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \\n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", + "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161425,7 +161425,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2594, - "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \\n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \\n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \\n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \\n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \\n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \\n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \\n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \\n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", + "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161436,14 +161436,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Assistance by the international community", - "Sentence": "\\n Registration and documentation.", + "Sentence": "\n Registration and documentation.", "newParagraph": "food wfp may assist providing food given inability internee feed restricted freedom movement internee entitled full food ration least 2100 kilocalorie per day n health care international agency partner eg local red cross society may able provide mobile health clinic supplement hospital treatment serious medical matter medical care include reproductive health care female internee n nonfood item item plastic sheeting plate bucket blanket sleeping mat soap etc needed internee agency contribution essential agency unhcr icrc resource may able give extra assistance least temporarily government receives regular donor funding internment initiative n registration documentation agency could help host government develop system registration issuing identity documentation agency often need data eg icrc order arrange family tracing family visit unhcr purpose getting information profile internee may later come within mandate later stage internee apply refugee status icrc may issue documentation internee connection detentionmonitoring role n skill training combat problem idleness provide rehabilitation alternative skill internee well maintain order dignity internment agency partner must try providefund vocational skill training programme soon possible order demobilization reintegration start internment camp essential skill training programme could help internee become rehabilitated social skill training would also helpful sensitization human right civic education peacebuilding hivaids sexual genderbased violence n recreation sufficient space recreation sporting equipment provided purpose recreation n reestablishing family link icrc together national society try trace family member internee across border within host country allow family link reestablished maintained eg exchange red cross message civilian family member also crossed host country arrangement made maintaining family unity various option family could accommodated internment camp separate nearby facility refugee camp settlement family member voluntarily accommodated level 5 crosscutting issue crossborder population movement 17 540 together near internee advantage preserving family unity helping break military hierarchy internment camp reducing risk localrefugee community retaliation family member account connection combatant minimizing chance combatant moving civilian site order family member however family member may face security risk including physical violence sexual harassment internee civilian spouse child accommodated internee regular adequate family visit internment camp must arranged icrc unhcr relevant agency n monitoring icrc able carry regular confidential monitoring internment camp including treatment internee standard internment accordance mandate person deprived liberty reason related armed conflict report monitoring visit provided confidential basis government host country n host community involvement support host community vital internment process therefore agency consider providing host community communitybased development assistance programme", "ProcessedSent": "n registration documentation", "SentID": 8968 }, { "ParagraphID": 2594, - "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \\n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \\n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \\n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \\n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \\n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \\n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \\n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \\n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", + "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161461,7 +161461,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2594, - "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \\n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \\n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \\n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \\n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \\n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \\n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \\n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \\n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", + "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161479,7 +161479,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2594, - "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \\n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \\n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \\n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \\n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \\n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \\n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \\n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \\n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", + "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161497,7 +161497,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2594, - "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \\n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \\n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \\n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \\n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \\n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \\n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \\n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \\n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", + "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161508,14 +161508,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Assistance by the international community", - "Sentence": "\\n Skills training.", + "Sentence": "\n Skills training.", "newParagraph": "food wfp may assist providing food given inability internee feed restricted freedom movement internee entitled full food ration least 2100 kilocalorie per day n health care international agency partner eg local red cross society may able provide mobile health clinic supplement hospital treatment serious medical matter medical care include reproductive health care female internee n nonfood item item plastic sheeting plate bucket blanket sleeping mat soap etc needed internee agency contribution essential agency unhcr icrc resource may able give extra assistance least temporarily government receives regular donor funding internment initiative n registration documentation agency could help host government develop system registration issuing identity documentation agency often need data eg icrc order arrange family tracing family visit unhcr purpose getting information profile internee may later come within mandate later stage internee apply refugee status icrc may issue documentation internee connection detentionmonitoring role n skill training combat problem idleness provide rehabilitation alternative skill internee well maintain order dignity internment agency partner must try providefund vocational skill training programme soon possible order demobilization reintegration start internment camp essential skill training programme could help internee become rehabilitated social skill training would also helpful sensitization human right civic education peacebuilding hivaids sexual genderbased violence n recreation sufficient space recreation sporting equipment provided purpose recreation n reestablishing family link icrc together national society try trace family member internee across border within host country allow family link reestablished maintained eg exchange red cross message civilian family member also crossed host country arrangement made maintaining family unity various option family could accommodated internment camp separate nearby facility refugee camp settlement family member voluntarily accommodated level 5 crosscutting issue crossborder population movement 17 540 together near internee advantage preserving family unity helping break military hierarchy internment camp reducing risk localrefugee community retaliation family member account connection combatant minimizing chance combatant moving civilian site order family member however family member may face security risk including physical violence sexual harassment internee civilian spouse child accommodated internee regular adequate family visit internment camp must arranged icrc unhcr relevant agency n monitoring icrc able carry regular confidential monitoring internment camp including treatment internee standard internment accordance mandate person deprived liberty reason related armed conflict report monitoring visit provided confidential basis government host country n host community involvement support host community vital internment process therefore agency consider providing host community communitybased development assistance programme", "ProcessedSent": "n skill training", "SentID": 8972 }, { "ParagraphID": 2594, - "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \\n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \\n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \\n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \\n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \\n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \\n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \\n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \\n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", + "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161533,7 +161533,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2594, - "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \\n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \\n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \\n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \\n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \\n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \\n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \\n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \\n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", + "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161551,7 +161551,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2594, - "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \\n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \\n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \\n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \\n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \\n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \\n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \\n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \\n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", + "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161569,7 +161569,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2594, - "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \\n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \\n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \\n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \\n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \\n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \\n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \\n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \\n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", + "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161580,14 +161580,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Assistance by the international community", - "Sentence": "\\n Recreation.", + "Sentence": "\n Recreation.", "newParagraph": "food wfp may assist providing food given inability internee feed restricted freedom movement internee entitled full food ration least 2100 kilocalorie per day n health care international agency partner eg local red cross society may able provide mobile health clinic supplement hospital treatment serious medical matter medical care include reproductive health care female internee n nonfood item item plastic sheeting plate bucket blanket sleeping mat soap etc needed internee agency contribution essential agency unhcr icrc resource may able give extra assistance least temporarily government receives regular donor funding internment initiative n registration documentation agency could help host government develop system registration issuing identity documentation agency often need data eg icrc order arrange family tracing family visit unhcr purpose getting information profile internee may later come within mandate later stage internee apply refugee status icrc may issue documentation internee connection detentionmonitoring role n skill training combat problem idleness provide rehabilitation alternative skill internee well maintain order dignity internment agency partner must try providefund vocational skill training programme soon possible order demobilization reintegration start internment camp essential skill training programme could help internee become rehabilitated social skill training would also helpful sensitization human right civic education peacebuilding hivaids sexual genderbased violence n recreation sufficient space recreation sporting equipment provided purpose recreation n reestablishing family link icrc together national society try trace family member internee across border within host country allow family link reestablished maintained eg exchange red cross message civilian family member also crossed host country arrangement made maintaining family unity various option family could accommodated internment camp separate nearby facility refugee camp settlement family member voluntarily accommodated level 5 crosscutting issue crossborder population movement 17 540 together near internee advantage preserving family unity helping break military hierarchy internment camp reducing risk localrefugee community retaliation family member account connection combatant minimizing chance combatant moving civilian site order family member however family member may face security risk including physical violence sexual harassment internee civilian spouse child accommodated internee regular adequate family visit internment camp must arranged icrc unhcr relevant agency n monitoring icrc able carry regular confidential monitoring internment camp including treatment internee standard internment accordance mandate person deprived liberty reason related armed conflict report monitoring visit provided confidential basis government host country n host community involvement support host community vital internment process therefore agency consider providing host community communitybased development assistance programme", "ProcessedSent": "n recreation", "SentID": 8976 }, { "ParagraphID": 2594, - "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \\n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \\n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \\n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \\n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \\n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \\n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \\n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \\n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", + "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161605,7 +161605,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2594, - "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \\n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \\n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \\n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \\n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \\n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \\n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \\n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \\n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", + "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161616,14 +161616,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Assistance by the international community", - "Sentence": "\\n Re-establishing family links.", + "Sentence": "\n Re-establishing family links.", "newParagraph": "food wfp may assist providing food given inability internee feed restricted freedom movement internee entitled full food ration least 2100 kilocalorie per day n health care international agency partner eg local red cross society may able provide mobile health clinic supplement hospital treatment serious medical matter medical care include reproductive health care female internee n nonfood item item plastic sheeting plate bucket blanket sleeping mat soap etc needed internee agency contribution essential agency unhcr icrc resource may able give extra assistance least temporarily government receives regular donor funding internment initiative n registration documentation agency could help host government develop system registration issuing identity documentation agency often need data eg icrc order arrange family tracing family visit unhcr purpose getting information profile internee may later come within mandate later stage internee apply refugee status icrc may issue documentation internee connection detentionmonitoring role n skill training combat problem idleness provide rehabilitation alternative skill internee well maintain order dignity internment agency partner must try providefund vocational skill training programme soon possible order demobilization reintegration start internment camp essential skill training programme could help internee become rehabilitated social skill training would also helpful sensitization human right civic education peacebuilding hivaids sexual genderbased violence n recreation sufficient space recreation sporting equipment provided purpose recreation n reestablishing family link icrc together national society try trace family member internee across border within host country allow family link reestablished maintained eg exchange red cross message civilian family member also crossed host country arrangement made maintaining family unity various option family could accommodated internment camp separate nearby facility refugee camp settlement family member voluntarily accommodated level 5 crosscutting issue crossborder population movement 17 540 together near internee advantage preserving family unity helping break military hierarchy internment camp reducing risk localrefugee community retaliation family member account connection combatant minimizing chance combatant moving civilian site order family member however family member may face security risk including physical violence sexual harassment internee civilian spouse child accommodated internee regular adequate family visit internment camp must arranged icrc unhcr relevant agency n monitoring icrc able carry regular confidential monitoring internment camp including treatment internee standard internment accordance mandate person deprived liberty reason related armed conflict report monitoring visit provided confidential basis government host country n host community involvement support host community vital internment process therefore agency consider providing host community communitybased development assistance programme", "ProcessedSent": "n reestablishing family link", "SentID": 8978 }, { "ParagraphID": 2594, - "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \\n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \\n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \\n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \\n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \\n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \\n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \\n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \\n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", + "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161641,7 +161641,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2594, - "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \\n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \\n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \\n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \\n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \\n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \\n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \\n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \\n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", + "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161659,7 +161659,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2594, - "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \\n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \\n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \\n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \\n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \\n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \\n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \\n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \\n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", + "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161677,7 +161677,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2594, - "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \\n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \\n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \\n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \\n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \\n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \\n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \\n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \\n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", + "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161695,7 +161695,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2594, - "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \\n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \\n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \\n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \\n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \\n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \\n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \\n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \\n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", + "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161713,7 +161713,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2594, - "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \\n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \\n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \\n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \\n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \\n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \\n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \\n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \\n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", + "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161731,7 +161731,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2594, - "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \\n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \\n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \\n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \\n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \\n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \\n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \\n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \\n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", + "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161742,14 +161742,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Assistance by the international community", - "Sentence": "\\n Monitoring.", + "Sentence": "\n Monitoring.", "newParagraph": "food wfp may assist providing food given inability internee feed restricted freedom movement internee entitled full food ration least 2100 kilocalorie per day n health care international agency partner eg local red cross society may able provide mobile health clinic supplement hospital treatment serious medical matter medical care include reproductive health care female internee n nonfood item item plastic sheeting plate bucket blanket sleeping mat soap etc needed internee agency contribution essential agency unhcr icrc resource may able give extra assistance least temporarily government receives regular donor funding internment initiative n registration documentation agency could help host government develop system registration issuing identity documentation agency often need data eg icrc order arrange family tracing family visit unhcr purpose getting information profile internee may later come within mandate later stage internee apply refugee status icrc may issue documentation internee connection detentionmonitoring role n skill training combat problem idleness provide rehabilitation alternative skill internee well maintain order dignity internment agency partner must try providefund vocational skill training programme soon possible order demobilization reintegration start internment camp essential skill training programme could help internee become rehabilitated social skill training would also helpful sensitization human right civic education peacebuilding hivaids sexual genderbased violence n recreation sufficient space recreation sporting equipment provided purpose recreation n reestablishing family link icrc together national society try trace family member internee across border within host country allow family link reestablished maintained eg exchange red cross message civilian family member also crossed host country arrangement made maintaining family unity various option family could accommodated internment camp separate nearby facility refugee camp settlement family member voluntarily accommodated level 5 crosscutting issue crossborder population movement 17 540 together near internee advantage preserving family unity helping break military hierarchy internment camp reducing risk localrefugee community retaliation family member account connection combatant minimizing chance combatant moving civilian site order family member however family member may face security risk including physical violence sexual harassment internee civilian spouse child accommodated internee regular adequate family visit internment camp must arranged icrc unhcr relevant agency n monitoring icrc able carry regular confidential monitoring internment camp including treatment internee standard internment accordance mandate person deprived liberty reason related armed conflict report monitoring visit provided confidential basis government host country n host community involvement support host community vital internment process therefore agency consider providing host community communitybased development assistance programme", "ProcessedSent": "n monitoring", "SentID": 8985 }, { "ParagraphID": 2594, - "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \\n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \\n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \\n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \\n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \\n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \\n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \\n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \\n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", + "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161767,7 +161767,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2594, - "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \\n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \\n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \\n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \\n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \\n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \\n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \\n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \\n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", + "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161785,7 +161785,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2594, - "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \\n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \\n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \\n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \\n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \\n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \\n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \\n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \\n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", + "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161796,14 +161796,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Assistance by the international community", - "Sentence": "\\n Host communities.", + "Sentence": "\n Host communities.", "newParagraph": "food wfp may assist providing food given inability internee feed restricted freedom movement internee entitled full food ration least 2100 kilocalorie per day n health care international agency partner eg local red cross society may able provide mobile health clinic supplement hospital treatment serious medical matter medical care include reproductive health care female internee n nonfood item item plastic sheeting plate bucket blanket sleeping mat soap etc needed internee agency contribution essential agency unhcr icrc resource may able give extra assistance least temporarily government receives regular donor funding internment initiative n registration documentation agency could help host government develop system registration issuing identity documentation agency often need data eg icrc order arrange family tracing family visit unhcr purpose getting information profile internee may later come within mandate later stage internee apply refugee status icrc may issue documentation internee connection detentionmonitoring role n skill training combat problem idleness provide rehabilitation alternative skill internee well maintain order dignity internment agency partner must try providefund vocational skill training programme soon possible order demobilization reintegration start internment camp essential skill training programme could help internee become rehabilitated social skill training would also helpful sensitization human right civic education peacebuilding hivaids sexual genderbased violence n recreation sufficient space recreation sporting equipment provided purpose recreation n reestablishing family link icrc together national society try trace family member internee across border within host country allow family link reestablished maintained eg exchange red cross message civilian family member also crossed host country arrangement made maintaining family unity various option family could accommodated internment camp separate nearby facility refugee camp settlement family member voluntarily accommodated level 5 crosscutting issue crossborder population movement 17 540 together near internee advantage preserving family unity helping break military hierarchy internment camp reducing risk localrefugee community retaliation family member account connection combatant minimizing chance combatant moving civilian site order family member however family member may face security risk including physical violence sexual harassment internee civilian spouse child accommodated internee regular adequate family visit internment camp must arranged icrc unhcr relevant agency n monitoring icrc able carry regular confidential monitoring internment camp including treatment internee standard internment accordance mandate person deprived liberty reason related armed conflict report monitoring visit provided confidential basis government host country n host community involvement support host community vital internment process therefore agency consider providing host community communitybased development assistance programme", "ProcessedSent": "n host community", "SentID": 8988 }, { "ParagraphID": 2594, - "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \\n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \\n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \\n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \\n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \\n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \\n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \\n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \\n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", + "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -161821,7 +161821,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2594, - "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \\n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \\n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \\n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \\n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \\n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \\n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \\n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \\n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", + "Paragraph": "Food. WFP may assist with providing food. Given the inability of internees to feed themselves because of their restricted freedom of movement, each internee should be entitled to a full food ration of at least 2,100 kilocalories per day. \n Health care. International agencies\u2019 partners (e.g., local Red Cross societies) may be able to provide mobile health clinics, to supplement hospital treatment for more serious medical matters. Medical care should include reproductive health care for female internees. \n Non-food items. Items such as plastic sheeting, plates, buckets, blankets, sleeping mats, soap, etc. will be needed for each internee and agency contributions will be essential. Agencies such as UNHCR and ICRC, if they have the resources, may be able to give extra assistance at least temporarily until the government receives regular donor funding for the internment initiative. \n Registration and documentation. Agencies could help the host government to develop a system for registration and issuing of identity documentation. Agencies will often need the data themselves, e.g., ICRC in order to arrange family tracing and family visits, and UNHCR for the purpose of getting information on the profiles of internees who may later come within their mandate if, at a later stage, internees apply for refugee status. ICRC may issue its own documentation to internees in connection with its detention-monitoring role. \n Skills training. To combat the problem of idleness and to provide rehabilitation and alternative skills for internees, as well as to maintain order and dignity during internment, agency partners must try to provide\/fund vocational skills training programmes as soon as possible. In order for demobilization and reintegration to start in internment camps, it is essential to have skills training programmes that could help internees to become rehabilitated. Social skills training would also be helpful here, such as sensitization in human rights, civic education, peace-building, HIV\/AIDS, and sexual and gender-based violence. \n Recreation. Sufficient space for recreation and sporting equipment should be provided for the purpose of recreation. \n Re-establishing family links. ICRC, together with national societies, should try to trace family members of internees, both across borders and within the host country, which will allow family links to be re-established and maintained (e.g., through exchange of Red Cross messages). Where civilian family members have also crossed into the host country, arrangements should be made for maintaining family unity. There are various options: families could be accommodated in internment camps, or in a separate nearby facility, or in a refugee camp or settlement. If family members are voluntarily accommodated Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 17 5.40 together with or near to internees, this has the advantage of preserving family unity, helping to break down military hierarchies in internment camps, reducing risks of local\/refugee community retaliation against the family members on account of their connections to combatants, and minimizing the chances of combatants moving to civilian sites in order to be with their family members. However, the family members may face security risks, including physical violence and sexual harassment, from internees. Where civilian spouses and children are not accommodated with internees, regular and adequate family visits to internment camps must be arranged by ICRC, UNHCR or other relevant agencies. \n Monitoring. ICRC should be able to carry out regular, confidential monitoring of internment camps, including the treatment of internees and the standards of their internment, in accordance with its mandate for persons deprived of their liberty for reasons related to armed conflict. Reports from monitoring visits will be provided on a confidential basis to the government of the host country. \n Host communities. The involvement and support of host communities will be vital to the internment process. Therefore, agencies should consider providing host communities with community-based development assistance programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -162037,7 +162037,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2598, - "Paragraph": "Persons incorrectly interned include: \\n civilians who have not participated in military activities, and who could therefore be regarded as refugees or asylum seekers; \\n civilians who have not participated in military activities and who were abducted by combatants (including women and girls abducted for the purpose of sexual slavery and men abducted for medical or other labour services), but who do not fall within the definition of a refugee. Such persons will usually be voluntarily repatriated; \\n children associated with armed forces and groups who were not identified as children during the separation process, incorrectly ending up in internment camps for adult combatants; \\n persons who do not fit the definition of combatant, and who were separated and in\u00ad terned on the basis of criteria other than those established for the separation process.", + "Paragraph": "Persons incorrectly interned include: \n civilians who have not participated in military activities, and who could therefore be regarded as refugees or asylum seekers; \n civilians who have not participated in military activities and who were abducted by combatants (including women and girls abducted for the purpose of sexual slavery and men abducted for medical or other labour services), but who do not fall within the definition of a refugee. Such persons will usually be voluntarily repatriated; \n children associated with armed forces and groups who were not identified as children during the separation process, incorrectly ending up in internment camps for adult combatants; \n persons who do not fit the definition of combatant, and who were separated and in\u00ad terned on the basis of criteria other than those established for the separation process.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -162048,14 +162048,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Redressing incorrect internment decisions", - "Sentence": "Persons incorrectly interned include: \\n civilians who have not participated in military activities, and who could therefore be regarded as refugees or asylum seekers; \\n civilians who have not participated in military activities and who were abducted by combatants (including women and girls abducted for the purpose of sexual slavery and men abducted for medical or other labour services), but who do not fall within the definition of a refugee.", + "Sentence": "Persons incorrectly interned include: \n civilians who have not participated in military activities, and who could therefore be regarded as refugees or asylum seekers; \n civilians who have not participated in military activities and who were abducted by combatants (including women and girls abducted for the purpose of sexual slavery and men abducted for medical or other labour services), but who do not fall within the definition of a refugee.", "newParagraph": "person incorrectly interned include n civilian participated military activity could therefore regarded refugee asylum seeker n civilian participated military activity abducted combatant including woman girl abducted purpose sexual slavery men abducted medical labour service fall within definition refugee person usually voluntarily repatriated n child associated armed force group identified child separation process incorrectly ending internment camp adult combatant n person fit definition combatant separated terned basis criterion established separation process", "ProcessedSent": "person incorrectly interned include n civilian participated military activity could therefore regarded refugee asylum seeker n civilian participated military activity abducted combatant including woman girl abducted purpose sexual slavery men abducted medical labour service fall within definition refugee", "SentID": 9002 }, { "ParagraphID": 2598, - "Paragraph": "Persons incorrectly interned include: \\n civilians who have not participated in military activities, and who could therefore be regarded as refugees or asylum seekers; \\n civilians who have not participated in military activities and who were abducted by combatants (including women and girls abducted for the purpose of sexual slavery and men abducted for medical or other labour services), but who do not fall within the definition of a refugee. Such persons will usually be voluntarily repatriated; \\n children associated with armed forces and groups who were not identified as children during the separation process, incorrectly ending up in internment camps for adult combatants; \\n persons who do not fit the definition of combatant, and who were separated and in\u00ad terned on the basis of criteria other than those established for the separation process.", + "Paragraph": "Persons incorrectly interned include: \n civilians who have not participated in military activities, and who could therefore be regarded as refugees or asylum seekers; \n civilians who have not participated in military activities and who were abducted by combatants (including women and girls abducted for the purpose of sexual slavery and men abducted for medical or other labour services), but who do not fall within the definition of a refugee. Such persons will usually be voluntarily repatriated; \n children associated with armed forces and groups who were not identified as children during the separation process, incorrectly ending up in internment camps for adult combatants; \n persons who do not fit the definition of combatant, and who were separated and in\u00ad terned on the basis of criteria other than those established for the separation process.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -162066,14 +162066,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Redressing incorrect internment decisions", - "Sentence": "Such persons will usually be voluntarily repatriated; \\n children associated with armed forces and groups who were not identified as children during the separation process, incorrectly ending up in internment camps for adult combatants; \\n persons who do not fit the definition of combatant, and who were separated and in\u00ad terned on the basis of criteria other than those established for the separation process.", + "Sentence": "Such persons will usually be voluntarily repatriated; \n children associated with armed forces and groups who were not identified as children during the separation process, incorrectly ending up in internment camps for adult combatants; \n persons who do not fit the definition of combatant, and who were separated and in\u00ad terned on the basis of criteria other than those established for the separation process.", "newParagraph": "person incorrectly interned include n civilian participated military activity could therefore regarded refugee asylum seeker n civilian participated military activity abducted combatant including woman girl abducted purpose sexual slavery men abducted medical labour service fall within definition refugee person usually voluntarily repatriated n child associated armed force group identified child separation process incorrectly ending internment camp adult combatant n person fit definition combatant separated terned basis criterion established separation process", "ProcessedSent": "person usually voluntarily repatriated n child associated armed force group identified child separation process incorrectly ending internment camp adult combatant n person fit definition combatant separated terned basis criterion established separation process", "SentID": 9003 }, { "ParagraphID": 2599, - "Paragraph": "It is important, whenever possible, to plan for exit strategies for internment programmes, although where the conflict in the country of origin lasts a long time, internment may also be lengthy. Exit strategies may include: \\n including internees in DDR programmes in the country of origin at the end of the conflict; \\n deciding whether internees who are considered to have become civilians after a period of demobilization and who apply for refugee status should be given that status.", + "Paragraph": "It is important, whenever possible, to plan for exit strategies for internment programmes, although where the conflict in the country of origin lasts a long time, internment may also be lengthy. Exit strategies may include: \n including internees in DDR programmes in the country of origin at the end of the conflict; \n deciding whether internees who are considered to have become civilians after a period of demobilization and who apply for refugee status should be given that status.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -162091,7 +162091,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2599, - "Paragraph": "It is important, whenever possible, to plan for exit strategies for internment programmes, although where the conflict in the country of origin lasts a long time, internment may also be lengthy. Exit strategies may include: \\n including internees in DDR programmes in the country of origin at the end of the conflict; \\n deciding whether internees who are considered to have become civilians after a period of demobilization and who apply for refugee status should be given that status.", + "Paragraph": "It is important, whenever possible, to plan for exit strategies for internment programmes, although where the conflict in the country of origin lasts a long time, internment may also be lengthy. Exit strategies may include: \n including internees in DDR programmes in the country of origin at the end of the conflict; \n deciding whether internees who are considered to have become civilians after a period of demobilization and who apply for refugee status should be given that status.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -162102,7 +162102,7 @@ "Heading2": "7.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "7.3.7. Internment10", "Heading4": "Exit strategies", - "Sentence": "Exit strategies may include: \\n including internees in DDR programmes in the country of origin at the end of the conflict; \\n deciding whether internees who are considered to have become civilians after a period of demobilization and who apply for refugee status should be given that status.", + "Sentence": "Exit strategies may include: \n including internees in DDR programmes in the country of origin at the end of the conflict; \n deciding whether internees who are considered to have become civilians after a period of demobilization and who apply for refugee status should be given that status.", "newParagraph": "important whenever possible plan exit strategy internment programme although conflict country origin last long time internment may also lengthy exit strategy may include n including internee ddr programme country origin end conflict n deciding whether internee considered become civilian period demobilization apply refugee status given status", "ProcessedSent": "exit strategy may include n including internee ddr programme country origin end conflict n deciding whether internee considered become civilian period demobilization apply refugee status given status", "SentID": 9005 @@ -163387,7 +163387,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2622, - "Paragraph": "Security in and around refugee camps and settlements can be achieved through: \\n locating refugee camps and settlements a safe distance away from the border (generally at least 50 kilometres) and conflict zones; \\n the systematic identification, disarmament, separation and internment of combatants; \\n the screening of persons being relocated to refugee camps to ensure that only civilians are admitted; \\n prohibiting armed elements from residence in, transit though or visits to refugee camps and settlements; \\n prohibiting all military activities in refugee camps, including recruitment, training and providing support to combatants; \\n prohibiting the holding, trading and bringing of weapons and ammunition into refugee camps and settlements by unauthorized persons; \\n ensuring the presence of enough agency staff in camps and settlements; enforcing law and order in camps and settlements; \\n enforcing security measures such as stationing police in and around camps and settle\u00ad ments; \\n involving refugees in ensuring their own security and the peaceful and humanitarian character of camps and settlements, e.g., through community\u00adbased neighbourhood watch schemes and good governance measures in camps and settlements; \\n enforcing properly functioning camp rules and by\u00adlaws to regulate the conduct of refugees, resolve disputes, etc., in order to supplement the laws of the host country (to which refugees are also subject); \\n correctly designing the size and physical layout of camps and settlements; encouraging good neighbourliness between refugee camps\/settlements and host communities.", + "Paragraph": "Security in and around refugee camps and settlements can be achieved through: \n locating refugee camps and settlements a safe distance away from the border (generally at least 50 kilometres) and conflict zones; \n the systematic identification, disarmament, separation and internment of combatants; \n the screening of persons being relocated to refugee camps to ensure that only civilians are admitted; \n prohibiting armed elements from residence in, transit though or visits to refugee camps and settlements; \n prohibiting all military activities in refugee camps, including recruitment, training and providing support to combatants; \n prohibiting the holding, trading and bringing of weapons and ammunition into refugee camps and settlements by unauthorized persons; \n ensuring the presence of enough agency staff in camps and settlements; enforcing law and order in camps and settlements; \n enforcing security measures such as stationing police in and around camps and settle\u00ad ments; \n involving refugees in ensuring their own security and the peaceful and humanitarian character of camps and settlements, e.g., through community\u00adbased neighbourhood watch schemes and good governance measures in camps and settlements; \n enforcing properly functioning camp rules and by\u00adlaws to regulate the conduct of refugees, resolve disputes, etc., in order to supplement the laws of the host country (to which refugees are also subject); \n correctly designing the size and physical layout of camps and settlements; encouraging good neighbourliness between refugee camps\/settlements and host communities.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -163398,7 +163398,7 @@ "Heading2": "9.3. Key actions", "Heading3": "9.3.3. Preserving the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Security in and around refugee camps and settlements can be achieved through: \\n locating refugee camps and settlements a safe distance away from the border (generally at least 50 kilometres) and conflict zones; \\n the systematic identification, disarmament, separation and internment of combatants; \\n the screening of persons being relocated to refugee camps to ensure that only civilians are admitted; \\n prohibiting armed elements from residence in, transit though or visits to refugee camps and settlements; \\n prohibiting all military activities in refugee camps, including recruitment, training and providing support to combatants; \\n prohibiting the holding, trading and bringing of weapons and ammunition into refugee camps and settlements by unauthorized persons; \\n ensuring the presence of enough agency staff in camps and settlements; enforcing law and order in camps and settlements; \\n enforcing security measures such as stationing police in and around camps and settle\u00ad ments; \\n involving refugees in ensuring their own security and the peaceful and humanitarian character of camps and settlements, e.g., through community\u00adbased neighbourhood watch schemes and good governance measures in camps and settlements; \\n enforcing properly functioning camp rules and by\u00adlaws to regulate the conduct of refugees, resolve disputes, etc., in order to supplement the laws of the host country (to which refugees are also subject); \\n correctly designing the size and physical layout of camps and settlements; encouraging good neighbourliness between refugee camps\/settlements and host communities.", + "Sentence": "Security in and around refugee camps and settlements can be achieved through: \n locating refugee camps and settlements a safe distance away from the border (generally at least 50 kilometres) and conflict zones; \n the systematic identification, disarmament, separation and internment of combatants; \n the screening of persons being relocated to refugee camps to ensure that only civilians are admitted; \n prohibiting armed elements from residence in, transit though or visits to refugee camps and settlements; \n prohibiting all military activities in refugee camps, including recruitment, training and providing support to combatants; \n prohibiting the holding, trading and bringing of weapons and ammunition into refugee camps and settlements by unauthorized persons; \n ensuring the presence of enough agency staff in camps and settlements; enforcing law and order in camps and settlements; \n enforcing security measures such as stationing police in and around camps and settle\u00ad ments; \n involving refugees in ensuring their own security and the peaceful and humanitarian character of camps and settlements, e.g., through community\u00adbased neighbourhood watch schemes and good governance measures in camps and settlements; \n enforcing properly functioning camp rules and by\u00adlaws to regulate the conduct of refugees, resolve disputes, etc., in order to supplement the laws of the host country (to which refugees are also subject); \n correctly designing the size and physical layout of camps and settlements; encouraging good neighbourliness between refugee camps\/settlements and host communities.", "newParagraph": "security around refugee camp settlement achieved n locating refugee camp settlement safe distance away border generally least 50 kilometre conflict zone n systematic identification disarmament separation internment combatant n screening person relocated refugee camp ensure civilian admitted n prohibiting armed element residence transit though visit refugee camp settlement n prohibiting military activity refugee camp including recruitment training providing support combatant n prohibiting holding trading bringing weapon ammunition refugee camp settlement unauthorized person n ensuring presence enough agency staff camp settlement enforcing law order camp settlement n enforcing security measure stationing police around camp settle ments n involving refugee ensuring security peaceful humanitarian character camp settlement eg community based neighbourhood watch scheme good governance measure camp settlement n enforcing properly functioning camp rule law regulate conduct refugee resolve dispute etc order supplement law host country refugee also subject n correctly designing size physical layout camp settlement encouraging good neighbourliness refugee campssettlements host community", "ProcessedSent": "security around refugee camp settlement achieved n locating refugee camp settlement safe distance away border generally least 50 kilometre conflict zone n systematic identification disarmament separation internment combatant n screening person relocated refugee camp ensure civilian admitted n prohibiting armed element residence transit though visit refugee camp settlement n prohibiting military activity refugee camp including recruitment training providing support combatant n prohibiting holding trading bringing weapon ammunition refugee camp settlement unauthorized person n ensuring presence enough agency staff camp settlement enforcing law order camp settlement n enforcing security measure stationing police around camp settle ments n involving refugee ensuring security peaceful humanitarian character camp settlement eg community based neighbourhood watch scheme good governance measure camp settlement n enforcing properly functioning camp rule law regulate conduct refugee resolve dispute etc order supplement law host country refugee also subject n correctly designing size physical layout camp settlement encouraging good neighbourliness refugee campssettlements host community", "SentID": 9077 @@ -163675,7 +163675,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2630, - "Paragraph": "Since lasting peace and stability in a region depend on the ability of DDR programmes to attract the maximum possible number of former combatants, the following principles relat\u00ad ing to regional and cross\u00adborder issues should be taken into account in planning for DDR: \\n DDR programmes should be open to all persons who have taken part in the con\u00ad flict, including foreigners and nationals who have crossed international borders. Extensive sensitization is needed both in countries of origin and host countries to ensure that all persons entitled to par\u00ad ticipate in DDR programmes are aware of their right to do so; DDR programmes should be open to all persons who have taken part in the conflict, including foreigners and nationals who have crossed international borders. \\n close coordination and links among all DDR programmes in a region are essential. There should be regular coordination meetings on DDR issues \u2014 including, in particular, regional aspects \u2014 among UN missions, national commissions on DDR or competent government agencies, and other relevant agencies; \\n to avoid disruptive consequences, including illicit cross\u00adborder movements and traffick\u00ad ing of weapons, standards in DDR programmes within a region should be harmonized as much as possible. While DDR programmes may be implemented within a regional framework, such programmes must nevertheless take into full consideration the poli\u00ad tical, social and economic contexts of the different countries in which they are to be implemented; \\n in order to have accurate information on foreign combatants who have been involved in a conflict, DDR registration forms should contain a specific question on the national\u00ad ity of the combatant.", + "Paragraph": "Since lasting peace and stability in a region depend on the ability of DDR programmes to attract the maximum possible number of former combatants, the following principles relat\u00ad ing to regional and cross\u00adborder issues should be taken into account in planning for DDR: \n DDR programmes should be open to all persons who have taken part in the con\u00ad flict, including foreigners and nationals who have crossed international borders. Extensive sensitization is needed both in countries of origin and host countries to ensure that all persons entitled to par\u00ad ticipate in DDR programmes are aware of their right to do so; DDR programmes should be open to all persons who have taken part in the conflict, including foreigners and nationals who have crossed international borders. \n close coordination and links among all DDR programmes in a region are essential. There should be regular coordination meetings on DDR issues \u2014 including, in particular, regional aspects \u2014 among UN missions, national commissions on DDR or competent government agencies, and other relevant agencies; \n to avoid disruptive consequences, including illicit cross\u00adborder movements and traffick\u00ad ing of weapons, standards in DDR programmes within a region should be harmonized as much as possible. While DDR programmes may be implemented within a regional framework, such programmes must nevertheless take into full consideration the poli\u00ad tical, social and economic contexts of the different countries in which they are to be implemented; \n in order to have accurate information on foreign combatants who have been involved in a conflict, DDR registration forms should contain a specific question on the national\u00ad ity of the combatant.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -163686,14 +163686,14 @@ "Heading2": "11.1. Regional dimensions to be taken into account in setting up DDR programmes", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Since lasting peace and stability in a region depend on the ability of DDR programmes to attract the maximum possible number of former combatants, the following principles relat\u00ad ing to regional and cross\u00adborder issues should be taken into account in planning for DDR: \\n DDR programmes should be open to all persons who have taken part in the con\u00ad flict, including foreigners and nationals who have crossed international borders.", + "Sentence": "Since lasting peace and stability in a region depend on the ability of DDR programmes to attract the maximum possible number of former combatants, the following principles relat\u00ad ing to regional and cross\u00adborder issues should be taken into account in planning for DDR: \n DDR programmes should be open to all persons who have taken part in the con\u00ad flict, including foreigners and nationals who have crossed international borders.", "newParagraph": "since lasting peace stability region depend ability ddr programme attract maximum possible number former combatant following principle relat ing regional cross border issue taken account planning ddr n ddr programme open person taken part con flict including foreigner national crossed international border extensive sensitization needed country origin host country ensure person entitled par ticipate ddr programme aware right ddr programme open person taken part conflict including foreigner national crossed international border n close coordination link among ddr programme region essential regular coordination meeting ddr issue including particular regional aspect among un mission national commission ddr competent government agency relevant agency n avoid disruptive consequence including illicit cross border movement traffick ing weapon standard ddr programme within region harmonized much possible ddr programme may implemented within regional framework programme must nevertheless take full consideration poli tical social economic context different country implemented n order accurate information foreign combatant involved conflict ddr registration form contain specific question national ity combatant", "ProcessedSent": "since lasting peace stability region depend ability ddr programme attract maximum possible number former combatant following principle relat ing regional cross border issue taken account planning ddr n ddr programme open person taken part con flict including foreigner national crossed international border", "SentID": 9093 }, { "ParagraphID": 2630, - "Paragraph": "Since lasting peace and stability in a region depend on the ability of DDR programmes to attract the maximum possible number of former combatants, the following principles relat\u00ad ing to regional and cross\u00adborder issues should be taken into account in planning for DDR: \\n DDR programmes should be open to all persons who have taken part in the con\u00ad flict, including foreigners and nationals who have crossed international borders. Extensive sensitization is needed both in countries of origin and host countries to ensure that all persons entitled to par\u00ad ticipate in DDR programmes are aware of their right to do so; DDR programmes should be open to all persons who have taken part in the conflict, including foreigners and nationals who have crossed international borders. \\n close coordination and links among all DDR programmes in a region are essential. There should be regular coordination meetings on DDR issues \u2014 including, in particular, regional aspects \u2014 among UN missions, national commissions on DDR or competent government agencies, and other relevant agencies; \\n to avoid disruptive consequences, including illicit cross\u00adborder movements and traffick\u00ad ing of weapons, standards in DDR programmes within a region should be harmonized as much as possible. While DDR programmes may be implemented within a regional framework, such programmes must nevertheless take into full consideration the poli\u00ad tical, social and economic contexts of the different countries in which they are to be implemented; \\n in order to have accurate information on foreign combatants who have been involved in a conflict, DDR registration forms should contain a specific question on the national\u00ad ity of the combatant.", + "Paragraph": "Since lasting peace and stability in a region depend on the ability of DDR programmes to attract the maximum possible number of former combatants, the following principles relat\u00ad ing to regional and cross\u00adborder issues should be taken into account in planning for DDR: \n DDR programmes should be open to all persons who have taken part in the con\u00ad flict, including foreigners and nationals who have crossed international borders. Extensive sensitization is needed both in countries of origin and host countries to ensure that all persons entitled to par\u00ad ticipate in DDR programmes are aware of their right to do so; DDR programmes should be open to all persons who have taken part in the conflict, including foreigners and nationals who have crossed international borders. \n close coordination and links among all DDR programmes in a region are essential. There should be regular coordination meetings on DDR issues \u2014 including, in particular, regional aspects \u2014 among UN missions, national commissions on DDR or competent government agencies, and other relevant agencies; \n to avoid disruptive consequences, including illicit cross\u00adborder movements and traffick\u00ad ing of weapons, standards in DDR programmes within a region should be harmonized as much as possible. While DDR programmes may be implemented within a regional framework, such programmes must nevertheless take into full consideration the poli\u00ad tical, social and economic contexts of the different countries in which they are to be implemented; \n in order to have accurate information on foreign combatants who have been involved in a conflict, DDR registration forms should contain a specific question on the national\u00ad ity of the combatant.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -163711,7 +163711,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2630, - "Paragraph": "Since lasting peace and stability in a region depend on the ability of DDR programmes to attract the maximum possible number of former combatants, the following principles relat\u00ad ing to regional and cross\u00adborder issues should be taken into account in planning for DDR: \\n DDR programmes should be open to all persons who have taken part in the con\u00ad flict, including foreigners and nationals who have crossed international borders. Extensive sensitization is needed both in countries of origin and host countries to ensure that all persons entitled to par\u00ad ticipate in DDR programmes are aware of their right to do so; DDR programmes should be open to all persons who have taken part in the conflict, including foreigners and nationals who have crossed international borders. \\n close coordination and links among all DDR programmes in a region are essential. There should be regular coordination meetings on DDR issues \u2014 including, in particular, regional aspects \u2014 among UN missions, national commissions on DDR or competent government agencies, and other relevant agencies; \\n to avoid disruptive consequences, including illicit cross\u00adborder movements and traffick\u00ad ing of weapons, standards in DDR programmes within a region should be harmonized as much as possible. While DDR programmes may be implemented within a regional framework, such programmes must nevertheless take into full consideration the poli\u00ad tical, social and economic contexts of the different countries in which they are to be implemented; \\n in order to have accurate information on foreign combatants who have been involved in a conflict, DDR registration forms should contain a specific question on the national\u00ad ity of the combatant.", + "Paragraph": "Since lasting peace and stability in a region depend on the ability of DDR programmes to attract the maximum possible number of former combatants, the following principles relat\u00ad ing to regional and cross\u00adborder issues should be taken into account in planning for DDR: \n DDR programmes should be open to all persons who have taken part in the con\u00ad flict, including foreigners and nationals who have crossed international borders. Extensive sensitization is needed both in countries of origin and host countries to ensure that all persons entitled to par\u00ad ticipate in DDR programmes are aware of their right to do so; DDR programmes should be open to all persons who have taken part in the conflict, including foreigners and nationals who have crossed international borders. \n close coordination and links among all DDR programmes in a region are essential. There should be regular coordination meetings on DDR issues \u2014 including, in particular, regional aspects \u2014 among UN missions, national commissions on DDR or competent government agencies, and other relevant agencies; \n to avoid disruptive consequences, including illicit cross\u00adborder movements and traffick\u00ad ing of weapons, standards in DDR programmes within a region should be harmonized as much as possible. While DDR programmes may be implemented within a regional framework, such programmes must nevertheless take into full consideration the poli\u00ad tical, social and economic contexts of the different countries in which they are to be implemented; \n in order to have accurate information on foreign combatants who have been involved in a conflict, DDR registration forms should contain a specific question on the national\u00ad ity of the combatant.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -163722,14 +163722,14 @@ "Heading2": "11.1. Regional dimensions to be taken into account in setting up DDR programmes", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n close coordination and links among all DDR programmes in a region are essential.", + "Sentence": "\n close coordination and links among all DDR programmes in a region are essential.", "newParagraph": "since lasting peace stability region depend ability ddr programme attract maximum possible number former combatant following principle relat ing regional cross border issue taken account planning ddr n ddr programme open person taken part con flict including foreigner national crossed international border extensive sensitization needed country origin host country ensure person entitled par ticipate ddr programme aware right ddr programme open person taken part conflict including foreigner national crossed international border n close coordination link among ddr programme region essential regular coordination meeting ddr issue including particular regional aspect among un mission national commission ddr competent government agency relevant agency n avoid disruptive consequence including illicit cross border movement traffick ing weapon standard ddr programme within region harmonized much possible ddr programme may implemented within regional framework programme must nevertheless take full consideration poli tical social economic context different country implemented n order accurate information foreign combatant involved conflict ddr registration form contain specific question national ity combatant", "ProcessedSent": "n close coordination link among ddr programme region essential", "SentID": 9095 }, { "ParagraphID": 2630, - "Paragraph": "Since lasting peace and stability in a region depend on the ability of DDR programmes to attract the maximum possible number of former combatants, the following principles relat\u00ad ing to regional and cross\u00adborder issues should be taken into account in planning for DDR: \\n DDR programmes should be open to all persons who have taken part in the con\u00ad flict, including foreigners and nationals who have crossed international borders. Extensive sensitization is needed both in countries of origin and host countries to ensure that all persons entitled to par\u00ad ticipate in DDR programmes are aware of their right to do so; DDR programmes should be open to all persons who have taken part in the conflict, including foreigners and nationals who have crossed international borders. \\n close coordination and links among all DDR programmes in a region are essential. There should be regular coordination meetings on DDR issues \u2014 including, in particular, regional aspects \u2014 among UN missions, national commissions on DDR or competent government agencies, and other relevant agencies; \\n to avoid disruptive consequences, including illicit cross\u00adborder movements and traffick\u00ad ing of weapons, standards in DDR programmes within a region should be harmonized as much as possible. While DDR programmes may be implemented within a regional framework, such programmes must nevertheless take into full consideration the poli\u00ad tical, social and economic contexts of the different countries in which they are to be implemented; \\n in order to have accurate information on foreign combatants who have been involved in a conflict, DDR registration forms should contain a specific question on the national\u00ad ity of the combatant.", + "Paragraph": "Since lasting peace and stability in a region depend on the ability of DDR programmes to attract the maximum possible number of former combatants, the following principles relat\u00ad ing to regional and cross\u00adborder issues should be taken into account in planning for DDR: \n DDR programmes should be open to all persons who have taken part in the con\u00ad flict, including foreigners and nationals who have crossed international borders. Extensive sensitization is needed both in countries of origin and host countries to ensure that all persons entitled to par\u00ad ticipate in DDR programmes are aware of their right to do so; DDR programmes should be open to all persons who have taken part in the conflict, including foreigners and nationals who have crossed international borders. \n close coordination and links among all DDR programmes in a region are essential. There should be regular coordination meetings on DDR issues \u2014 including, in particular, regional aspects \u2014 among UN missions, national commissions on DDR or competent government agencies, and other relevant agencies; \n to avoid disruptive consequences, including illicit cross\u00adborder movements and traffick\u00ad ing of weapons, standards in DDR programmes within a region should be harmonized as much as possible. While DDR programmes may be implemented within a regional framework, such programmes must nevertheless take into full consideration the poli\u00ad tical, social and economic contexts of the different countries in which they are to be implemented; \n in order to have accurate information on foreign combatants who have been involved in a conflict, DDR registration forms should contain a specific question on the national\u00ad ity of the combatant.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -163740,14 +163740,14 @@ "Heading2": "11.1. Regional dimensions to be taken into account in setting up DDR programmes", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "There should be regular coordination meetings on DDR issues \u2014 including, in particular, regional aspects \u2014 among UN missions, national commissions on DDR or competent government agencies, and other relevant agencies; \\n to avoid disruptive consequences, including illicit cross\u00adborder movements and traffick\u00ad ing of weapons, standards in DDR programmes within a region should be harmonized as much as possible.", + "Sentence": "There should be regular coordination meetings on DDR issues \u2014 including, in particular, regional aspects \u2014 among UN missions, national commissions on DDR or competent government agencies, and other relevant agencies; \n to avoid disruptive consequences, including illicit cross\u00adborder movements and traffick\u00ad ing of weapons, standards in DDR programmes within a region should be harmonized as much as possible.", "newParagraph": "since lasting peace stability region depend ability ddr programme attract maximum possible number former combatant following principle relat ing regional cross border issue taken account planning ddr n ddr programme open person taken part con flict including foreigner national crossed international border extensive sensitization needed country origin host country ensure person entitled par ticipate ddr programme aware right ddr programme open person taken part conflict including foreigner national crossed international border n close coordination link among ddr programme region essential regular coordination meeting ddr issue including particular regional aspect among un mission national commission ddr competent government agency relevant agency n avoid disruptive consequence including illicit cross border movement traffick ing weapon standard ddr programme within region harmonized much possible ddr programme may implemented within regional framework programme must nevertheless take full consideration poli tical social economic context different country implemented n order accurate information foreign combatant involved conflict ddr registration form contain specific question national ity combatant", "ProcessedSent": "regular coordination meeting ddr issue including particular regional aspect among un mission national commission ddr competent government agency relevant agency n avoid disruptive consequence including illicit cross border movement traffick ing weapon standard ddr programme within region harmonized much possible", "SentID": 9096 }, { "ParagraphID": 2630, - "Paragraph": "Since lasting peace and stability in a region depend on the ability of DDR programmes to attract the maximum possible number of former combatants, the following principles relat\u00ad ing to regional and cross\u00adborder issues should be taken into account in planning for DDR: \\n DDR programmes should be open to all persons who have taken part in the con\u00ad flict, including foreigners and nationals who have crossed international borders. Extensive sensitization is needed both in countries of origin and host countries to ensure that all persons entitled to par\u00ad ticipate in DDR programmes are aware of their right to do so; DDR programmes should be open to all persons who have taken part in the conflict, including foreigners and nationals who have crossed international borders. \\n close coordination and links among all DDR programmes in a region are essential. There should be regular coordination meetings on DDR issues \u2014 including, in particular, regional aspects \u2014 among UN missions, national commissions on DDR or competent government agencies, and other relevant agencies; \\n to avoid disruptive consequences, including illicit cross\u00adborder movements and traffick\u00ad ing of weapons, standards in DDR programmes within a region should be harmonized as much as possible. While DDR programmes may be implemented within a regional framework, such programmes must nevertheless take into full consideration the poli\u00ad tical, social and economic contexts of the different countries in which they are to be implemented; \\n in order to have accurate information on foreign combatants who have been involved in a conflict, DDR registration forms should contain a specific question on the national\u00ad ity of the combatant.", + "Paragraph": "Since lasting peace and stability in a region depend on the ability of DDR programmes to attract the maximum possible number of former combatants, the following principles relat\u00ad ing to regional and cross\u00adborder issues should be taken into account in planning for DDR: \n DDR programmes should be open to all persons who have taken part in the con\u00ad flict, including foreigners and nationals who have crossed international borders. Extensive sensitization is needed both in countries of origin and host countries to ensure that all persons entitled to par\u00ad ticipate in DDR programmes are aware of their right to do so; DDR programmes should be open to all persons who have taken part in the conflict, including foreigners and nationals who have crossed international borders. \n close coordination and links among all DDR programmes in a region are essential. There should be regular coordination meetings on DDR issues \u2014 including, in particular, regional aspects \u2014 among UN missions, national commissions on DDR or competent government agencies, and other relevant agencies; \n to avoid disruptive consequences, including illicit cross\u00adborder movements and traffick\u00ad ing of weapons, standards in DDR programmes within a region should be harmonized as much as possible. While DDR programmes may be implemented within a regional framework, such programmes must nevertheless take into full consideration the poli\u00ad tical, social and economic contexts of the different countries in which they are to be implemented; \n in order to have accurate information on foreign combatants who have been involved in a conflict, DDR registration forms should contain a specific question on the national\u00ad ity of the combatant.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -163758,7 +163758,7 @@ "Heading2": "11.1. Regional dimensions to be taken into account in setting up DDR programmes", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "While DDR programmes may be implemented within a regional framework, such programmes must nevertheless take into full consideration the poli\u00ad tical, social and economic contexts of the different countries in which they are to be implemented; \\n in order to have accurate information on foreign combatants who have been involved in a conflict, DDR registration forms should contain a specific question on the national\u00ad ity of the combatant.", + "Sentence": "While DDR programmes may be implemented within a regional framework, such programmes must nevertheless take into full consideration the poli\u00ad tical, social and economic contexts of the different countries in which they are to be implemented; \n in order to have accurate information on foreign combatants who have been involved in a conflict, DDR registration forms should contain a specific question on the national\u00ad ity of the combatant.", "newParagraph": "since lasting peace stability region depend ability ddr programme attract maximum possible number former combatant following principle relat ing regional cross border issue taken account planning ddr n ddr programme open person taken part con flict including foreigner national crossed international border extensive sensitization needed country origin host country ensure person entitled par ticipate ddr programme aware right ddr programme open person taken part conflict including foreigner national crossed international border n close coordination link among ddr programme region essential regular coordination meeting ddr issue including particular regional aspect among un mission national commission ddr competent government agency relevant agency n avoid disruptive consequence including illicit cross border movement traffick ing weapon standard ddr programme within region harmonized much possible ddr programme may implemented within regional framework programme must nevertheless take full consideration poli tical social economic context different country implemented n order accurate information foreign combatant involved conflict ddr registration form contain specific question national ity combatant", "ProcessedSent": "ddr programme may implemented within regional framework programme must nevertheless take full consideration poli tical social economic context different country implemented n order accurate information foreign combatant involved conflict ddr registration form contain specific question national ity combatant", "SentID": 9097 @@ -164629,7 +164629,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2647, - "Paragraph": "Return in safety implies a guarantee of: \\n legal security (e.g., appropriate amnesties or public assurances of personal safety, integ\u00ad rity, non\u00addiscrimination and freedom from fear of persecution); \\n physical security (e.g., protection from armed attacks, routes that are free of unexploded ordnances and mines); \\n material security (e.g., access to land or ways to earn a living).", + "Paragraph": "Return in safety implies a guarantee of: \n legal security (e.g., appropriate amnesties or public assurances of personal safety, integ\u00ad rity, non\u00addiscrimination and freedom from fear of persecution); \n physical security (e.g., protection from armed attacks, routes that are free of unexploded ordnances and mines); \n material security (e.g., access to land or ways to earn a living).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -164640,7 +164640,7 @@ "Heading2": "12.1. Assurances upon return", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Return in safety implies a guarantee of: \\n legal security (e.g., appropriate amnesties or public assurances of personal safety, integ\u00ad rity, non\u00addiscrimination and freedom from fear of persecution); \\n physical security (e.g., protection from armed attacks, routes that are free of unexploded ordnances and mines); \\n material security (e.g., access to land or ways to earn a living).", + "Sentence": "Return in safety implies a guarantee of: \n legal security (e.g., appropriate amnesties or public assurances of personal safety, integ\u00ad rity, non\u00addiscrimination and freedom from fear of persecution); \n physical security (e.g., protection from armed attacks, routes that are free of unexploded ordnances and mines); \n material security (e.g., access to land or ways to earn a living).", "newParagraph": "return safety implies guarantee n legal security eg appropriate amnesty public assurance personal safety integ rity non discrimination freedom fear persecution n physical security eg protection armed attack route free unexploded ordnance mine n material security eg access land way earn living", "ProcessedSent": "return safety implies guarantee n legal security eg appropriate amnesty public assurance personal safety integ rity non discrimination freedom fear persecution n physical security eg protection armed attack route free unexploded ordnance mine n material security eg access land way earn living", "SentID": 9146 @@ -165061,7 +165061,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2658, - "Paragraph": "What issues should be monitored? \\n Non-discrimination: Returned former combatants and their families\/other dependants should not be targeted for harassment, intimidation, extra-judicial punishment, violence, denial of fair access to public institutions or services, or be discriminated against in the enjoyment of any basic rights or services (e.g., health, education, shelter); \\n Amnesties and guarantees: Returned former combatants and their families should benefit from any amnesties in force for the population generally or for returnees specifically. Amnesties may cover, for example, matters relating to having left the country of origin and having found refuge in another country, draft evasion and desertion, as well as the act of performing military service in unrecognized armed groups. Amnesties for international crimes, such as genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious violations of international humanitarian law, are not supported by the UN. Former combatants may legitimately be prosecuted for such crimes, but they must receive a fair trial in accordance with judicial procedures; \\n Respect for human rights: In common with all other citizens, the human rights and fundamental freedoms of former combatants and their families must be fully respected; 2.30 Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 31 5.40 \\n Access to land: Equitable access to land for settlement and agricultural use should be encouraged; \\n Property recovery: Land or other property that returned former combatants and their families may have lost or left behind should be restored to them. UN missions should support governments in setting up dispute resolution procedures on issues such as property recovery. The specific needs of women, including widows of former combatants, should be taken into account, particularly where traditional practices and laws discriminate against women\u2019s rights to own and inherit property; \\n Protection from landmines and unexploded ordnances: Main areas of return may be at risk from landmines and unexploded ordnances that have not yet been cleared. Awareness-raising, mine clearance and other efforts should therefore include all members of the community; \\n Protection from stigmatization: Survivors of sexual abuse, and girls and women who have had to bear their abusers\u2019 children may be at risk of rejection from their communities and families. There may be a need for specific community sensitization to combat this problem, as well as efforts to empower survivors through inclusion in constructive socio-economic activities.", + "Paragraph": "What issues should be monitored? \n Non-discrimination: Returned former combatants and their families\/other dependants should not be targeted for harassment, intimidation, extra-judicial punishment, violence, denial of fair access to public institutions or services, or be discriminated against in the enjoyment of any basic rights or services (e.g., health, education, shelter); \n Amnesties and guarantees: Returned former combatants and their families should benefit from any amnesties in force for the population generally or for returnees specifically. Amnesties may cover, for example, matters relating to having left the country of origin and having found refuge in another country, draft evasion and desertion, as well as the act of performing military service in unrecognized armed groups. Amnesties for international crimes, such as genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious violations of international humanitarian law, are not supported by the UN. Former combatants may legitimately be prosecuted for such crimes, but they must receive a fair trial in accordance with judicial procedures; \n Respect for human rights: In common with all other citizens, the human rights and fundamental freedoms of former combatants and their families must be fully respected; 2.30 Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 31 5.40 \n Access to land: Equitable access to land for settlement and agricultural use should be encouraged; \n Property recovery: Land or other property that returned former combatants and their families may have lost or left behind should be restored to them. UN missions should support governments in setting up dispute resolution procedures on issues such as property recovery. The specific needs of women, including widows of former combatants, should be taken into account, particularly where traditional practices and laws discriminate against women\u2019s rights to own and inherit property; \n Protection from landmines and unexploded ordnances: Main areas of return may be at risk from landmines and unexploded ordnances that have not yet been cleared. Awareness-raising, mine clearance and other efforts should therefore include all members of the community; \n Protection from stigmatization: Survivors of sexual abuse, and girls and women who have had to bear their abusers\u2019 children may be at risk of rejection from their communities and families. There may be a need for specific community sensitization to combat this problem, as well as efforts to empower survivors through inclusion in constructive socio-economic activities.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -165079,7 +165079,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2658, - "Paragraph": "What issues should be monitored? \\n Non-discrimination: Returned former combatants and their families\/other dependants should not be targeted for harassment, intimidation, extra-judicial punishment, violence, denial of fair access to public institutions or services, or be discriminated against in the enjoyment of any basic rights or services (e.g., health, education, shelter); \\n Amnesties and guarantees: Returned former combatants and their families should benefit from any amnesties in force for the population generally or for returnees specifically. Amnesties may cover, for example, matters relating to having left the country of origin and having found refuge in another country, draft evasion and desertion, as well as the act of performing military service in unrecognized armed groups. Amnesties for international crimes, such as genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious violations of international humanitarian law, are not supported by the UN. Former combatants may legitimately be prosecuted for such crimes, but they must receive a fair trial in accordance with judicial procedures; \\n Respect for human rights: In common with all other citizens, the human rights and fundamental freedoms of former combatants and their families must be fully respected; 2.30 Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 31 5.40 \\n Access to land: Equitable access to land for settlement and agricultural use should be encouraged; \\n Property recovery: Land or other property that returned former combatants and their families may have lost or left behind should be restored to them. UN missions should support governments in setting up dispute resolution procedures on issues such as property recovery. The specific needs of women, including widows of former combatants, should be taken into account, particularly where traditional practices and laws discriminate against women\u2019s rights to own and inherit property; \\n Protection from landmines and unexploded ordnances: Main areas of return may be at risk from landmines and unexploded ordnances that have not yet been cleared. Awareness-raising, mine clearance and other efforts should therefore include all members of the community; \\n Protection from stigmatization: Survivors of sexual abuse, and girls and women who have had to bear their abusers\u2019 children may be at risk of rejection from their communities and families. There may be a need for specific community sensitization to combat this problem, as well as efforts to empower survivors through inclusion in constructive socio-economic activities.", + "Paragraph": "What issues should be monitored? \n Non-discrimination: Returned former combatants and their families\/other dependants should not be targeted for harassment, intimidation, extra-judicial punishment, violence, denial of fair access to public institutions or services, or be discriminated against in the enjoyment of any basic rights or services (e.g., health, education, shelter); \n Amnesties and guarantees: Returned former combatants and their families should benefit from any amnesties in force for the population generally or for returnees specifically. Amnesties may cover, for example, matters relating to having left the country of origin and having found refuge in another country, draft evasion and desertion, as well as the act of performing military service in unrecognized armed groups. Amnesties for international crimes, such as genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious violations of international humanitarian law, are not supported by the UN. Former combatants may legitimately be prosecuted for such crimes, but they must receive a fair trial in accordance with judicial procedures; \n Respect for human rights: In common with all other citizens, the human rights and fundamental freedoms of former combatants and their families must be fully respected; 2.30 Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 31 5.40 \n Access to land: Equitable access to land for settlement and agricultural use should be encouraged; \n Property recovery: Land or other property that returned former combatants and their families may have lost or left behind should be restored to them. UN missions should support governments in setting up dispute resolution procedures on issues such as property recovery. The specific needs of women, including widows of former combatants, should be taken into account, particularly where traditional practices and laws discriminate against women\u2019s rights to own and inherit property; \n Protection from landmines and unexploded ordnances: Main areas of return may be at risk from landmines and unexploded ordnances that have not yet been cleared. Awareness-raising, mine clearance and other efforts should therefore include all members of the community; \n Protection from stigmatization: Survivors of sexual abuse, and girls and women who have had to bear their abusers\u2019 children may be at risk of rejection from their communities and families. There may be a need for specific community sensitization to combat this problem, as well as efforts to empower survivors through inclusion in constructive socio-economic activities.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -165090,14 +165090,14 @@ "Heading2": "12.4. Monitoring", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Non-discrimination: Returned former combatants and their families\/other dependants should not be targeted for harassment, intimidation, extra-judicial punishment, violence, denial of fair access to public institutions or services, or be discriminated against in the enjoyment of any basic rights or services (e.g., health, education, shelter); \\n Amnesties and guarantees: Returned former combatants and their families should benefit from any amnesties in force for the population generally or for returnees specifically.", + "Sentence": "\n Non-discrimination: Returned former combatants and their families\/other dependants should not be targeted for harassment, intimidation, extra-judicial punishment, violence, denial of fair access to public institutions or services, or be discriminated against in the enjoyment of any basic rights or services (e.g., health, education, shelter); \n Amnesties and guarantees: Returned former combatants and their families should benefit from any amnesties in force for the population generally or for returnees specifically.", "newParagraph": "issue monitored n nondiscrimination returned former combatant familiesother dependant targeted harassment intimidation extrajudicial punishment violence denial fair access public institution service discriminated enjoyment basic right service eg health education shelter n amnesty guarantee returned former combatant family benefit amnesty force population generally returnees specifically amnesty may cover example matter relating left country origin found refuge another country draft evasion desertion well act performing military service unrecognized armed group amnesty international crime genocide crime humanity war crime serious violation international humanitarian law supported un former combatant may legitimately prosecuted crime must receive fair trial accordance judicial procedure n respect human right common citizen human right fundamental freedom former combatant family must fully respected 230 level 5 crosscutting issue crossborder population movement 31 540 n access land equitable access land settlement agricultural use encouraged n property recovery land property returned former combatant family may lost left behind restored un mission support government setting dispute resolution procedure issue property recovery specific need woman including widow former combatant taken account particularly traditional practice law discriminate woman right inherit property n protection landmines unexploded ordnance main area return may risk landmines unexploded ordnance yet cleared awarenessraising mine clearance effort therefore include member community n protection stigmatization survivor sexual abuse girl woman bear abuser child may risk rejection community family may need specific community sensitization combat problem well effort empower survivor inclusion constructive socioeconomic activity", "ProcessedSent": "n nondiscrimination returned former combatant familiesother dependant targeted harassment intimidation extrajudicial punishment violence denial fair access public institution service discriminated enjoyment basic right service eg health education shelter n amnesty guarantee returned former combatant family benefit amnesty force population generally returnees specifically", "SentID": 9171 }, { "ParagraphID": 2658, - "Paragraph": "What issues should be monitored? \\n Non-discrimination: Returned former combatants and their families\/other dependants should not be targeted for harassment, intimidation, extra-judicial punishment, violence, denial of fair access to public institutions or services, or be discriminated against in the enjoyment of any basic rights or services (e.g., health, education, shelter); \\n Amnesties and guarantees: Returned former combatants and their families should benefit from any amnesties in force for the population generally or for returnees specifically. Amnesties may cover, for example, matters relating to having left the country of origin and having found refuge in another country, draft evasion and desertion, as well as the act of performing military service in unrecognized armed groups. Amnesties for international crimes, such as genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious violations of international humanitarian law, are not supported by the UN. Former combatants may legitimately be prosecuted for such crimes, but they must receive a fair trial in accordance with judicial procedures; \\n Respect for human rights: In common with all other citizens, the human rights and fundamental freedoms of former combatants and their families must be fully respected; 2.30 Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 31 5.40 \\n Access to land: Equitable access to land for settlement and agricultural use should be encouraged; \\n Property recovery: Land or other property that returned former combatants and their families may have lost or left behind should be restored to them. UN missions should support governments in setting up dispute resolution procedures on issues such as property recovery. The specific needs of women, including widows of former combatants, should be taken into account, particularly where traditional practices and laws discriminate against women\u2019s rights to own and inherit property; \\n Protection from landmines and unexploded ordnances: Main areas of return may be at risk from landmines and unexploded ordnances that have not yet been cleared. Awareness-raising, mine clearance and other efforts should therefore include all members of the community; \\n Protection from stigmatization: Survivors of sexual abuse, and girls and women who have had to bear their abusers\u2019 children may be at risk of rejection from their communities and families. There may be a need for specific community sensitization to combat this problem, as well as efforts to empower survivors through inclusion in constructive socio-economic activities.", + "Paragraph": "What issues should be monitored? \n Non-discrimination: Returned former combatants and their families\/other dependants should not be targeted for harassment, intimidation, extra-judicial punishment, violence, denial of fair access to public institutions or services, or be discriminated against in the enjoyment of any basic rights or services (e.g., health, education, shelter); \n Amnesties and guarantees: Returned former combatants and their families should benefit from any amnesties in force for the population generally or for returnees specifically. Amnesties may cover, for example, matters relating to having left the country of origin and having found refuge in another country, draft evasion and desertion, as well as the act of performing military service in unrecognized armed groups. Amnesties for international crimes, such as genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious violations of international humanitarian law, are not supported by the UN. Former combatants may legitimately be prosecuted for such crimes, but they must receive a fair trial in accordance with judicial procedures; \n Respect for human rights: In common with all other citizens, the human rights and fundamental freedoms of former combatants and their families must be fully respected; 2.30 Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 31 5.40 \n Access to land: Equitable access to land for settlement and agricultural use should be encouraged; \n Property recovery: Land or other property that returned former combatants and their families may have lost or left behind should be restored to them. UN missions should support governments in setting up dispute resolution procedures on issues such as property recovery. The specific needs of women, including widows of former combatants, should be taken into account, particularly where traditional practices and laws discriminate against women\u2019s rights to own and inherit property; \n Protection from landmines and unexploded ordnances: Main areas of return may be at risk from landmines and unexploded ordnances that have not yet been cleared. Awareness-raising, mine clearance and other efforts should therefore include all members of the community; \n Protection from stigmatization: Survivors of sexual abuse, and girls and women who have had to bear their abusers\u2019 children may be at risk of rejection from their communities and families. There may be a need for specific community sensitization to combat this problem, as well as efforts to empower survivors through inclusion in constructive socio-economic activities.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -165115,7 +165115,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2658, - "Paragraph": "What issues should be monitored? \\n Non-discrimination: Returned former combatants and their families\/other dependants should not be targeted for harassment, intimidation, extra-judicial punishment, violence, denial of fair access to public institutions or services, or be discriminated against in the enjoyment of any basic rights or services (e.g., health, education, shelter); \\n Amnesties and guarantees: Returned former combatants and their families should benefit from any amnesties in force for the population generally or for returnees specifically. Amnesties may cover, for example, matters relating to having left the country of origin and having found refuge in another country, draft evasion and desertion, as well as the act of performing military service in unrecognized armed groups. Amnesties for international crimes, such as genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious violations of international humanitarian law, are not supported by the UN. Former combatants may legitimately be prosecuted for such crimes, but they must receive a fair trial in accordance with judicial procedures; \\n Respect for human rights: In common with all other citizens, the human rights and fundamental freedoms of former combatants and their families must be fully respected; 2.30 Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 31 5.40 \\n Access to land: Equitable access to land for settlement and agricultural use should be encouraged; \\n Property recovery: Land or other property that returned former combatants and their families may have lost or left behind should be restored to them. UN missions should support governments in setting up dispute resolution procedures on issues such as property recovery. The specific needs of women, including widows of former combatants, should be taken into account, particularly where traditional practices and laws discriminate against women\u2019s rights to own and inherit property; \\n Protection from landmines and unexploded ordnances: Main areas of return may be at risk from landmines and unexploded ordnances that have not yet been cleared. Awareness-raising, mine clearance and other efforts should therefore include all members of the community; \\n Protection from stigmatization: Survivors of sexual abuse, and girls and women who have had to bear their abusers\u2019 children may be at risk of rejection from their communities and families. There may be a need for specific community sensitization to combat this problem, as well as efforts to empower survivors through inclusion in constructive socio-economic activities.", + "Paragraph": "What issues should be monitored? \n Non-discrimination: Returned former combatants and their families\/other dependants should not be targeted for harassment, intimidation, extra-judicial punishment, violence, denial of fair access to public institutions or services, or be discriminated against in the enjoyment of any basic rights or services (e.g., health, education, shelter); \n Amnesties and guarantees: Returned former combatants and their families should benefit from any amnesties in force for the population generally or for returnees specifically. Amnesties may cover, for example, matters relating to having left the country of origin and having found refuge in another country, draft evasion and desertion, as well as the act of performing military service in unrecognized armed groups. Amnesties for international crimes, such as genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious violations of international humanitarian law, are not supported by the UN. Former combatants may legitimately be prosecuted for such crimes, but they must receive a fair trial in accordance with judicial procedures; \n Respect for human rights: In common with all other citizens, the human rights and fundamental freedoms of former combatants and their families must be fully respected; 2.30 Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 31 5.40 \n Access to land: Equitable access to land for settlement and agricultural use should be encouraged; \n Property recovery: Land or other property that returned former combatants and their families may have lost or left behind should be restored to them. UN missions should support governments in setting up dispute resolution procedures on issues such as property recovery. The specific needs of women, including widows of former combatants, should be taken into account, particularly where traditional practices and laws discriminate against women\u2019s rights to own and inherit property; \n Protection from landmines and unexploded ordnances: Main areas of return may be at risk from landmines and unexploded ordnances that have not yet been cleared. Awareness-raising, mine clearance and other efforts should therefore include all members of the community; \n Protection from stigmatization: Survivors of sexual abuse, and girls and women who have had to bear their abusers\u2019 children may be at risk of rejection from their communities and families. There may be a need for specific community sensitization to combat this problem, as well as efforts to empower survivors through inclusion in constructive socio-economic activities.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -165133,7 +165133,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2658, - "Paragraph": "What issues should be monitored? \\n Non-discrimination: Returned former combatants and their families\/other dependants should not be targeted for harassment, intimidation, extra-judicial punishment, violence, denial of fair access to public institutions or services, or be discriminated against in the enjoyment of any basic rights or services (e.g., health, education, shelter); \\n Amnesties and guarantees: Returned former combatants and their families should benefit from any amnesties in force for the population generally or for returnees specifically. Amnesties may cover, for example, matters relating to having left the country of origin and having found refuge in another country, draft evasion and desertion, as well as the act of performing military service in unrecognized armed groups. Amnesties for international crimes, such as genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious violations of international humanitarian law, are not supported by the UN. Former combatants may legitimately be prosecuted for such crimes, but they must receive a fair trial in accordance with judicial procedures; \\n Respect for human rights: In common with all other citizens, the human rights and fundamental freedoms of former combatants and their families must be fully respected; 2.30 Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 31 5.40 \\n Access to land: Equitable access to land for settlement and agricultural use should be encouraged; \\n Property recovery: Land or other property that returned former combatants and their families may have lost or left behind should be restored to them. UN missions should support governments in setting up dispute resolution procedures on issues such as property recovery. The specific needs of women, including widows of former combatants, should be taken into account, particularly where traditional practices and laws discriminate against women\u2019s rights to own and inherit property; \\n Protection from landmines and unexploded ordnances: Main areas of return may be at risk from landmines and unexploded ordnances that have not yet been cleared. Awareness-raising, mine clearance and other efforts should therefore include all members of the community; \\n Protection from stigmatization: Survivors of sexual abuse, and girls and women who have had to bear their abusers\u2019 children may be at risk of rejection from their communities and families. There may be a need for specific community sensitization to combat this problem, as well as efforts to empower survivors through inclusion in constructive socio-economic activities.", + "Paragraph": "What issues should be monitored? \n Non-discrimination: Returned former combatants and their families\/other dependants should not be targeted for harassment, intimidation, extra-judicial punishment, violence, denial of fair access to public institutions or services, or be discriminated against in the enjoyment of any basic rights or services (e.g., health, education, shelter); \n Amnesties and guarantees: Returned former combatants and their families should benefit from any amnesties in force for the population generally or for returnees specifically. Amnesties may cover, for example, matters relating to having left the country of origin and having found refuge in another country, draft evasion and desertion, as well as the act of performing military service in unrecognized armed groups. Amnesties for international crimes, such as genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious violations of international humanitarian law, are not supported by the UN. Former combatants may legitimately be prosecuted for such crimes, but they must receive a fair trial in accordance with judicial procedures; \n Respect for human rights: In common with all other citizens, the human rights and fundamental freedoms of former combatants and their families must be fully respected; 2.30 Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 31 5.40 \n Access to land: Equitable access to land for settlement and agricultural use should be encouraged; \n Property recovery: Land or other property that returned former combatants and their families may have lost or left behind should be restored to them. UN missions should support governments in setting up dispute resolution procedures on issues such as property recovery. The specific needs of women, including widows of former combatants, should be taken into account, particularly where traditional practices and laws discriminate against women\u2019s rights to own and inherit property; \n Protection from landmines and unexploded ordnances: Main areas of return may be at risk from landmines and unexploded ordnances that have not yet been cleared. Awareness-raising, mine clearance and other efforts should therefore include all members of the community; \n Protection from stigmatization: Survivors of sexual abuse, and girls and women who have had to bear their abusers\u2019 children may be at risk of rejection from their communities and families. There may be a need for specific community sensitization to combat this problem, as well as efforts to empower survivors through inclusion in constructive socio-economic activities.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -165144,14 +165144,14 @@ "Heading2": "12.4. Monitoring", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Former combatants may legitimately be prosecuted for such crimes, but they must receive a fair trial in accordance with judicial procedures; \\n Respect for human rights: In common with all other citizens, the human rights and fundamental freedoms of former combatants and their families must be fully respected; 2.30 Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 31 5.40 \\n Access to land: Equitable access to land for settlement and agricultural use should be encouraged; \\n Property recovery: Land or other property that returned former combatants and their families may have lost or left behind should be restored to them.", + "Sentence": "Former combatants may legitimately be prosecuted for such crimes, but they must receive a fair trial in accordance with judicial procedures; \n Respect for human rights: In common with all other citizens, the human rights and fundamental freedoms of former combatants and their families must be fully respected; 2.30 Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 31 5.40 \n Access to land: Equitable access to land for settlement and agricultural use should be encouraged; \n Property recovery: Land or other property that returned former combatants and their families may have lost or left behind should be restored to them.", "newParagraph": "issue monitored n nondiscrimination returned former combatant familiesother dependant targeted harassment intimidation extrajudicial punishment violence denial fair access public institution service discriminated enjoyment basic right service eg health education shelter n amnesty guarantee returned former combatant family benefit amnesty force population generally returnees specifically amnesty may cover example matter relating left country origin found refuge another country draft evasion desertion well act performing military service unrecognized armed group amnesty international crime genocide crime humanity war crime serious violation international humanitarian law supported un former combatant may legitimately prosecuted crime must receive fair trial accordance judicial procedure n respect human right common citizen human right fundamental freedom former combatant family must fully respected 230 level 5 crosscutting issue crossborder population movement 31 540 n access land equitable access land settlement agricultural use encouraged n property recovery land property returned former combatant family may lost left behind restored un mission support government setting dispute resolution procedure issue property recovery specific need woman including widow former combatant taken account particularly traditional practice law discriminate woman right inherit property n protection landmines unexploded ordnance main area return may risk landmines unexploded ordnance yet cleared awarenessraising mine clearance effort therefore include member community n protection stigmatization survivor sexual abuse girl woman bear abuser child may risk rejection community family may need specific community sensitization combat problem well effort empower survivor inclusion constructive socioeconomic activity", "ProcessedSent": "former combatant may legitimately prosecuted crime must receive fair trial accordance judicial procedure n respect human right common citizen human right fundamental freedom former combatant family must fully respected 230 level 5 crosscutting issue crossborder population movement 31 540 n access land equitable access land settlement agricultural use encouraged n property recovery land property returned former combatant family may lost left behind restored", "SentID": 9174 }, { "ParagraphID": 2658, - "Paragraph": "What issues should be monitored? \\n Non-discrimination: Returned former combatants and their families\/other dependants should not be targeted for harassment, intimidation, extra-judicial punishment, violence, denial of fair access to public institutions or services, or be discriminated against in the enjoyment of any basic rights or services (e.g., health, education, shelter); \\n Amnesties and guarantees: Returned former combatants and their families should benefit from any amnesties in force for the population generally or for returnees specifically. Amnesties may cover, for example, matters relating to having left the country of origin and having found refuge in another country, draft evasion and desertion, as well as the act of performing military service in unrecognized armed groups. Amnesties for international crimes, such as genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious violations of international humanitarian law, are not supported by the UN. Former combatants may legitimately be prosecuted for such crimes, but they must receive a fair trial in accordance with judicial procedures; \\n Respect for human rights: In common with all other citizens, the human rights and fundamental freedoms of former combatants and their families must be fully respected; 2.30 Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 31 5.40 \\n Access to land: Equitable access to land for settlement and agricultural use should be encouraged; \\n Property recovery: Land or other property that returned former combatants and their families may have lost or left behind should be restored to them. UN missions should support governments in setting up dispute resolution procedures on issues such as property recovery. The specific needs of women, including widows of former combatants, should be taken into account, particularly where traditional practices and laws discriminate against women\u2019s rights to own and inherit property; \\n Protection from landmines and unexploded ordnances: Main areas of return may be at risk from landmines and unexploded ordnances that have not yet been cleared. Awareness-raising, mine clearance and other efforts should therefore include all members of the community; \\n Protection from stigmatization: Survivors of sexual abuse, and girls and women who have had to bear their abusers\u2019 children may be at risk of rejection from their communities and families. There may be a need for specific community sensitization to combat this problem, as well as efforts to empower survivors through inclusion in constructive socio-economic activities.", + "Paragraph": "What issues should be monitored? \n Non-discrimination: Returned former combatants and their families\/other dependants should not be targeted for harassment, intimidation, extra-judicial punishment, violence, denial of fair access to public institutions or services, or be discriminated against in the enjoyment of any basic rights or services (e.g., health, education, shelter); \n Amnesties and guarantees: Returned former combatants and their families should benefit from any amnesties in force for the population generally or for returnees specifically. Amnesties may cover, for example, matters relating to having left the country of origin and having found refuge in another country, draft evasion and desertion, as well as the act of performing military service in unrecognized armed groups. Amnesties for international crimes, such as genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious violations of international humanitarian law, are not supported by the UN. Former combatants may legitimately be prosecuted for such crimes, but they must receive a fair trial in accordance with judicial procedures; \n Respect for human rights: In common with all other citizens, the human rights and fundamental freedoms of former combatants and their families must be fully respected; 2.30 Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 31 5.40 \n Access to land: Equitable access to land for settlement and agricultural use should be encouraged; \n Property recovery: Land or other property that returned former combatants and their families may have lost or left behind should be restored to them. UN missions should support governments in setting up dispute resolution procedures on issues such as property recovery. The specific needs of women, including widows of former combatants, should be taken into account, particularly where traditional practices and laws discriminate against women\u2019s rights to own and inherit property; \n Protection from landmines and unexploded ordnances: Main areas of return may be at risk from landmines and unexploded ordnances that have not yet been cleared. Awareness-raising, mine clearance and other efforts should therefore include all members of the community; \n Protection from stigmatization: Survivors of sexual abuse, and girls and women who have had to bear their abusers\u2019 children may be at risk of rejection from their communities and families. There may be a need for specific community sensitization to combat this problem, as well as efforts to empower survivors through inclusion in constructive socio-economic activities.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -165169,7 +165169,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2658, - "Paragraph": "What issues should be monitored? \\n Non-discrimination: Returned former combatants and their families\/other dependants should not be targeted for harassment, intimidation, extra-judicial punishment, violence, denial of fair access to public institutions or services, or be discriminated against in the enjoyment of any basic rights or services (e.g., health, education, shelter); \\n Amnesties and guarantees: Returned former combatants and their families should benefit from any amnesties in force for the population generally or for returnees specifically. Amnesties may cover, for example, matters relating to having left the country of origin and having found refuge in another country, draft evasion and desertion, as well as the act of performing military service in unrecognized armed groups. Amnesties for international crimes, such as genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious violations of international humanitarian law, are not supported by the UN. Former combatants may legitimately be prosecuted for such crimes, but they must receive a fair trial in accordance with judicial procedures; \\n Respect for human rights: In common with all other citizens, the human rights and fundamental freedoms of former combatants and their families must be fully respected; 2.30 Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 31 5.40 \\n Access to land: Equitable access to land for settlement and agricultural use should be encouraged; \\n Property recovery: Land or other property that returned former combatants and their families may have lost or left behind should be restored to them. UN missions should support governments in setting up dispute resolution procedures on issues such as property recovery. The specific needs of women, including widows of former combatants, should be taken into account, particularly where traditional practices and laws discriminate against women\u2019s rights to own and inherit property; \\n Protection from landmines and unexploded ordnances: Main areas of return may be at risk from landmines and unexploded ordnances that have not yet been cleared. Awareness-raising, mine clearance and other efforts should therefore include all members of the community; \\n Protection from stigmatization: Survivors of sexual abuse, and girls and women who have had to bear their abusers\u2019 children may be at risk of rejection from their communities and families. There may be a need for specific community sensitization to combat this problem, as well as efforts to empower survivors through inclusion in constructive socio-economic activities.", + "Paragraph": "What issues should be monitored? \n Non-discrimination: Returned former combatants and their families\/other dependants should not be targeted for harassment, intimidation, extra-judicial punishment, violence, denial of fair access to public institutions or services, or be discriminated against in the enjoyment of any basic rights or services (e.g., health, education, shelter); \n Amnesties and guarantees: Returned former combatants and their families should benefit from any amnesties in force for the population generally or for returnees specifically. Amnesties may cover, for example, matters relating to having left the country of origin and having found refuge in another country, draft evasion and desertion, as well as the act of performing military service in unrecognized armed groups. Amnesties for international crimes, such as genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious violations of international humanitarian law, are not supported by the UN. Former combatants may legitimately be prosecuted for such crimes, but they must receive a fair trial in accordance with judicial procedures; \n Respect for human rights: In common with all other citizens, the human rights and fundamental freedoms of former combatants and their families must be fully respected; 2.30 Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 31 5.40 \n Access to land: Equitable access to land for settlement and agricultural use should be encouraged; \n Property recovery: Land or other property that returned former combatants and their families may have lost or left behind should be restored to them. UN missions should support governments in setting up dispute resolution procedures on issues such as property recovery. The specific needs of women, including widows of former combatants, should be taken into account, particularly where traditional practices and laws discriminate against women\u2019s rights to own and inherit property; \n Protection from landmines and unexploded ordnances: Main areas of return may be at risk from landmines and unexploded ordnances that have not yet been cleared. Awareness-raising, mine clearance and other efforts should therefore include all members of the community; \n Protection from stigmatization: Survivors of sexual abuse, and girls and women who have had to bear their abusers\u2019 children may be at risk of rejection from their communities and families. There may be a need for specific community sensitization to combat this problem, as well as efforts to empower survivors through inclusion in constructive socio-economic activities.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -165180,14 +165180,14 @@ "Heading2": "12.4. Monitoring", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The specific needs of women, including widows of former combatants, should be taken into account, particularly where traditional practices and laws discriminate against women\u2019s rights to own and inherit property; \\n Protection from landmines and unexploded ordnances: Main areas of return may be at risk from landmines and unexploded ordnances that have not yet been cleared.", + "Sentence": "The specific needs of women, including widows of former combatants, should be taken into account, particularly where traditional practices and laws discriminate against women\u2019s rights to own and inherit property; \n Protection from landmines and unexploded ordnances: Main areas of return may be at risk from landmines and unexploded ordnances that have not yet been cleared.", "newParagraph": "issue monitored n nondiscrimination returned former combatant familiesother dependant targeted harassment intimidation extrajudicial punishment violence denial fair access public institution service discriminated enjoyment basic right service eg health education shelter n amnesty guarantee returned former combatant family benefit amnesty force population generally returnees specifically amnesty may cover example matter relating left country origin found refuge another country draft evasion desertion well act performing military service unrecognized armed group amnesty international crime genocide crime humanity war crime serious violation international humanitarian law supported un former combatant may legitimately prosecuted crime must receive fair trial accordance judicial procedure n respect human right common citizen human right fundamental freedom former combatant family must fully respected 230 level 5 crosscutting issue crossborder population movement 31 540 n access land equitable access land settlement agricultural use encouraged n property recovery land property returned former combatant family may lost left behind restored un mission support government setting dispute resolution procedure issue property recovery specific need woman including widow former combatant taken account particularly traditional practice law discriminate woman right inherit property n protection landmines unexploded ordnance main area return may risk landmines unexploded ordnance yet cleared awarenessraising mine clearance effort therefore include member community n protection stigmatization survivor sexual abuse girl woman bear abuser child may risk rejection community family may need specific community sensitization combat problem well effort empower survivor inclusion constructive socioeconomic activity", "ProcessedSent": "specific need woman including widow former combatant taken account particularly traditional practice law discriminate woman right inherit property n protection landmines unexploded ordnance main area return may risk landmines unexploded ordnance yet cleared", "SentID": 9176 }, { "ParagraphID": 2658, - "Paragraph": "What issues should be monitored? \\n Non-discrimination: Returned former combatants and their families\/other dependants should not be targeted for harassment, intimidation, extra-judicial punishment, violence, denial of fair access to public institutions or services, or be discriminated against in the enjoyment of any basic rights or services (e.g., health, education, shelter); \\n Amnesties and guarantees: Returned former combatants and their families should benefit from any amnesties in force for the population generally or for returnees specifically. Amnesties may cover, for example, matters relating to having left the country of origin and having found refuge in another country, draft evasion and desertion, as well as the act of performing military service in unrecognized armed groups. Amnesties for international crimes, such as genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious violations of international humanitarian law, are not supported by the UN. Former combatants may legitimately be prosecuted for such crimes, but they must receive a fair trial in accordance with judicial procedures; \\n Respect for human rights: In common with all other citizens, the human rights and fundamental freedoms of former combatants and their families must be fully respected; 2.30 Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 31 5.40 \\n Access to land: Equitable access to land for settlement and agricultural use should be encouraged; \\n Property recovery: Land or other property that returned former combatants and their families may have lost or left behind should be restored to them. UN missions should support governments in setting up dispute resolution procedures on issues such as property recovery. The specific needs of women, including widows of former combatants, should be taken into account, particularly where traditional practices and laws discriminate against women\u2019s rights to own and inherit property; \\n Protection from landmines and unexploded ordnances: Main areas of return may be at risk from landmines and unexploded ordnances that have not yet been cleared. Awareness-raising, mine clearance and other efforts should therefore include all members of the community; \\n Protection from stigmatization: Survivors of sexual abuse, and girls and women who have had to bear their abusers\u2019 children may be at risk of rejection from their communities and families. There may be a need for specific community sensitization to combat this problem, as well as efforts to empower survivors through inclusion in constructive socio-economic activities.", + "Paragraph": "What issues should be monitored? \n Non-discrimination: Returned former combatants and their families\/other dependants should not be targeted for harassment, intimidation, extra-judicial punishment, violence, denial of fair access to public institutions or services, or be discriminated against in the enjoyment of any basic rights or services (e.g., health, education, shelter); \n Amnesties and guarantees: Returned former combatants and their families should benefit from any amnesties in force for the population generally or for returnees specifically. Amnesties may cover, for example, matters relating to having left the country of origin and having found refuge in another country, draft evasion and desertion, as well as the act of performing military service in unrecognized armed groups. Amnesties for international crimes, such as genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious violations of international humanitarian law, are not supported by the UN. Former combatants may legitimately be prosecuted for such crimes, but they must receive a fair trial in accordance with judicial procedures; \n Respect for human rights: In common with all other citizens, the human rights and fundamental freedoms of former combatants and their families must be fully respected; 2.30 Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 31 5.40 \n Access to land: Equitable access to land for settlement and agricultural use should be encouraged; \n Property recovery: Land or other property that returned former combatants and their families may have lost or left behind should be restored to them. UN missions should support governments in setting up dispute resolution procedures on issues such as property recovery. The specific needs of women, including widows of former combatants, should be taken into account, particularly where traditional practices and laws discriminate against women\u2019s rights to own and inherit property; \n Protection from landmines and unexploded ordnances: Main areas of return may be at risk from landmines and unexploded ordnances that have not yet been cleared. Awareness-raising, mine clearance and other efforts should therefore include all members of the community; \n Protection from stigmatization: Survivors of sexual abuse, and girls and women who have had to bear their abusers\u2019 children may be at risk of rejection from their communities and families. There may be a need for specific community sensitization to combat this problem, as well as efforts to empower survivors through inclusion in constructive socio-economic activities.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -165198,14 +165198,14 @@ "Heading2": "12.4. Monitoring", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Awareness-raising, mine clearance and other efforts should therefore include all members of the community; \\n Protection from stigmatization: Survivors of sexual abuse, and girls and women who have had to bear their abusers\u2019 children may be at risk of rejection from their communities and families.", + "Sentence": "Awareness-raising, mine clearance and other efforts should therefore include all members of the community; \n Protection from stigmatization: Survivors of sexual abuse, and girls and women who have had to bear their abusers\u2019 children may be at risk of rejection from their communities and families.", "newParagraph": "issue monitored n nondiscrimination returned former combatant familiesother dependant targeted harassment intimidation extrajudicial punishment violence denial fair access public institution service discriminated enjoyment basic right service eg health education shelter n amnesty guarantee returned former combatant family benefit amnesty force population generally returnees specifically amnesty may cover example matter relating left country origin found refuge another country draft evasion desertion well act performing military service unrecognized armed group amnesty international crime genocide crime humanity war crime serious violation international humanitarian law supported un former combatant may legitimately prosecuted crime must receive fair trial accordance judicial procedure n respect human right common citizen human right fundamental freedom former combatant family must fully respected 230 level 5 crosscutting issue crossborder population movement 31 540 n access land equitable access land settlement agricultural use encouraged n property recovery land property returned former combatant family may lost left behind restored un mission support government setting dispute resolution procedure issue property recovery specific need woman including widow former combatant taken account particularly traditional practice law discriminate woman right inherit property n protection landmines unexploded ordnance main area return may risk landmines unexploded ordnance yet cleared awarenessraising mine clearance effort therefore include member community n protection stigmatization survivor sexual abuse girl woman bear abuser child may risk rejection community family may need specific community sensitization combat problem well effort empower survivor inclusion constructive socioeconomic activity", "ProcessedSent": "awarenessraising mine clearance effort therefore include member community n protection stigmatization survivor sexual abuse girl woman bear abuser child may risk rejection community family", "SentID": 9177 }, { "ParagraphID": 2658, - "Paragraph": "What issues should be monitored? \\n Non-discrimination: Returned former combatants and their families\/other dependants should not be targeted for harassment, intimidation, extra-judicial punishment, violence, denial of fair access to public institutions or services, or be discriminated against in the enjoyment of any basic rights or services (e.g., health, education, shelter); \\n Amnesties and guarantees: Returned former combatants and their families should benefit from any amnesties in force for the population generally or for returnees specifically. Amnesties may cover, for example, matters relating to having left the country of origin and having found refuge in another country, draft evasion and desertion, as well as the act of performing military service in unrecognized armed groups. Amnesties for international crimes, such as genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious violations of international humanitarian law, are not supported by the UN. Former combatants may legitimately be prosecuted for such crimes, but they must receive a fair trial in accordance with judicial procedures; \\n Respect for human rights: In common with all other citizens, the human rights and fundamental freedoms of former combatants and their families must be fully respected; 2.30 Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 31 5.40 \\n Access to land: Equitable access to land for settlement and agricultural use should be encouraged; \\n Property recovery: Land or other property that returned former combatants and their families may have lost or left behind should be restored to them. UN missions should support governments in setting up dispute resolution procedures on issues such as property recovery. The specific needs of women, including widows of former combatants, should be taken into account, particularly where traditional practices and laws discriminate against women\u2019s rights to own and inherit property; \\n Protection from landmines and unexploded ordnances: Main areas of return may be at risk from landmines and unexploded ordnances that have not yet been cleared. Awareness-raising, mine clearance and other efforts should therefore include all members of the community; \\n Protection from stigmatization: Survivors of sexual abuse, and girls and women who have had to bear their abusers\u2019 children may be at risk of rejection from their communities and families. There may be a need for specific community sensitization to combat this problem, as well as efforts to empower survivors through inclusion in constructive socio-economic activities.", + "Paragraph": "What issues should be monitored? \n Non-discrimination: Returned former combatants and their families\/other dependants should not be targeted for harassment, intimidation, extra-judicial punishment, violence, denial of fair access to public institutions or services, or be discriminated against in the enjoyment of any basic rights or services (e.g., health, education, shelter); \n Amnesties and guarantees: Returned former combatants and their families should benefit from any amnesties in force for the population generally or for returnees specifically. Amnesties may cover, for example, matters relating to having left the country of origin and having found refuge in another country, draft evasion and desertion, as well as the act of performing military service in unrecognized armed groups. Amnesties for international crimes, such as genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious violations of international humanitarian law, are not supported by the UN. Former combatants may legitimately be prosecuted for such crimes, but they must receive a fair trial in accordance with judicial procedures; \n Respect for human rights: In common with all other citizens, the human rights and fundamental freedoms of former combatants and their families must be fully respected; 2.30 Level 5 Cross-cutting Issues Cross-border Population Movements 31 5.40 \n Access to land: Equitable access to land for settlement and agricultural use should be encouraged; \n Property recovery: Land or other property that returned former combatants and their families may have lost or left behind should be restored to them. UN missions should support governments in setting up dispute resolution procedures on issues such as property recovery. The specific needs of women, including widows of former combatants, should be taken into account, particularly where traditional practices and laws discriminate against women\u2019s rights to own and inherit property; \n Protection from landmines and unexploded ordnances: Main areas of return may be at risk from landmines and unexploded ordnances that have not yet been cleared. Awareness-raising, mine clearance and other efforts should therefore include all members of the community; \n Protection from stigmatization: Survivors of sexual abuse, and girls and women who have had to bear their abusers\u2019 children may be at risk of rejection from their communities and families. There may be a need for specific community sensitization to combat this problem, as well as efforts to empower survivors through inclusion in constructive socio-economic activities.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -165295,7 +165295,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2661, - "Paragraph": "Determining refugee status must be linked to making sustainable long\u00adterm future plans for former combatants. These could be: \\n\\n Repatriation: Voluntary, safe and dignified repatriation to the country of origin at the end of the conflict or other event that gave rise to refugee claims is considered the best response for most population influxes; \\n\\n Local integration: For former combatants who are protected as refugees and therefore cannot be repatriated, the best option will be local integration, since options for third\u00ad country resettlement are likely to be limited. UNHCR negotiates with countries of asylum for local integration, and this process should be supported by UN missions and agencies. Local integration involves: \\n Legal processes: Refugees are granted an increasingly wider range of rights and entitlements identical to those enjoyed by other citizens, e.g., freedom of move\u00ad ment; family reunification in the country of asylum; access to education, the labour market, public relief and assistance, including health facilities; the possibility of acquiring and disposing of property; and the capacity to travel out of and return to the country of asylum with valid travel and identity documents. This process should gradually lead to permanent residence rights and the option to apply for citizenship in accordance with national laws; \\n Economic processes: Refugees become increasingly less reliant on humanitarian assistance or State aid, achieving a growing degree of self\u00adreliance and having permanent jobs, thus contributing to the economic life of the host country; \\n Social and cultural processes: These are interactive processes involving refugees feeling more and more at home in their new country, and local communities accept\u00ad ing their presence with greater ease, which allow refugees to live among the host population without fear of discrimination and contribute actively to the social life of their country of asylum; \\n\\n Resettlement: Third\u00adcountry resettlement may be appropriate for certain refugees who were formerly combatants, e.g., where the refugee has protection needs that cannot be met in the country of asylum, is unlikely to integrate into the host country, etc. However, despite UNHCR advocacy for assistance from the international community, it is often difficult to find resettlement opportunities for refugees who were former combatants. Some resettlement countries do not take former combatants, with sometimes varying definitions of what exactly a former combatant is. Therefore, resettlement to a third coun\u00ad try is unlikely to be a viable option for large numbers of former combatants, although it may be a solution in individual cases. The fact that very few countries take former com\u00ad batants could be used to encourage the host country to accept them for local integration.", + "Paragraph": "Determining refugee status must be linked to making sustainable long\u00adterm future plans for former combatants. These could be: \n\n Repatriation: Voluntary, safe and dignified repatriation to the country of origin at the end of the conflict or other event that gave rise to refugee claims is considered the best response for most population influxes; \n\n Local integration: For former combatants who are protected as refugees and therefore cannot be repatriated, the best option will be local integration, since options for third\u00ad country resettlement are likely to be limited. UNHCR negotiates with countries of asylum for local integration, and this process should be supported by UN missions and agencies. Local integration involves: \n Legal processes: Refugees are granted an increasingly wider range of rights and entitlements identical to those enjoyed by other citizens, e.g., freedom of move\u00ad ment; family reunification in the country of asylum; access to education, the labour market, public relief and assistance, including health facilities; the possibility of acquiring and disposing of property; and the capacity to travel out of and return to the country of asylum with valid travel and identity documents. This process should gradually lead to permanent residence rights and the option to apply for citizenship in accordance with national laws; \n Economic processes: Refugees become increasingly less reliant on humanitarian assistance or State aid, achieving a growing degree of self\u00adreliance and having permanent jobs, thus contributing to the economic life of the host country; \n Social and cultural processes: These are interactive processes involving refugees feeling more and more at home in their new country, and local communities accept\u00ad ing their presence with greater ease, which allow refugees to live among the host population without fear of discrimination and contribute actively to the social life of their country of asylum; \n\n Resettlement: Third\u00adcountry resettlement may be appropriate for certain refugees who were formerly combatants, e.g., where the refugee has protection needs that cannot be met in the country of asylum, is unlikely to integrate into the host country, etc. However, despite UNHCR advocacy for assistance from the international community, it is often difficult to find resettlement opportunities for refugees who were former combatants. Some resettlement countries do not take former combatants, with sometimes varying definitions of what exactly a former combatant is. Therefore, resettlement to a third coun\u00ad try is unlikely to be a viable option for large numbers of former combatants, although it may be a solution in individual cases. The fact that very few countries take former com\u00ad batants could be used to encourage the host country to accept them for local integration.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -165313,7 +165313,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2661, - "Paragraph": "Determining refugee status must be linked to making sustainable long\u00adterm future plans for former combatants. These could be: \\n\\n Repatriation: Voluntary, safe and dignified repatriation to the country of origin at the end of the conflict or other event that gave rise to refugee claims is considered the best response for most population influxes; \\n\\n Local integration: For former combatants who are protected as refugees and therefore cannot be repatriated, the best option will be local integration, since options for third\u00ad country resettlement are likely to be limited. UNHCR negotiates with countries of asylum for local integration, and this process should be supported by UN missions and agencies. Local integration involves: \\n Legal processes: Refugees are granted an increasingly wider range of rights and entitlements identical to those enjoyed by other citizens, e.g., freedom of move\u00ad ment; family reunification in the country of asylum; access to education, the labour market, public relief and assistance, including health facilities; the possibility of acquiring and disposing of property; and the capacity to travel out of and return to the country of asylum with valid travel and identity documents. This process should gradually lead to permanent residence rights and the option to apply for citizenship in accordance with national laws; \\n Economic processes: Refugees become increasingly less reliant on humanitarian assistance or State aid, achieving a growing degree of self\u00adreliance and having permanent jobs, thus contributing to the economic life of the host country; \\n Social and cultural processes: These are interactive processes involving refugees feeling more and more at home in their new country, and local communities accept\u00ad ing their presence with greater ease, which allow refugees to live among the host population without fear of discrimination and contribute actively to the social life of their country of asylum; \\n\\n Resettlement: Third\u00adcountry resettlement may be appropriate for certain refugees who were formerly combatants, e.g., where the refugee has protection needs that cannot be met in the country of asylum, is unlikely to integrate into the host country, etc. However, despite UNHCR advocacy for assistance from the international community, it is often difficult to find resettlement opportunities for refugees who were former combatants. Some resettlement countries do not take former combatants, with sometimes varying definitions of what exactly a former combatant is. Therefore, resettlement to a third coun\u00ad try is unlikely to be a viable option for large numbers of former combatants, although it may be a solution in individual cases. The fact that very few countries take former com\u00ad batants could be used to encourage the host country to accept them for local integration.", + "Paragraph": "Determining refugee status must be linked to making sustainable long\u00adterm future plans for former combatants. These could be: \n\n Repatriation: Voluntary, safe and dignified repatriation to the country of origin at the end of the conflict or other event that gave rise to refugee claims is considered the best response for most population influxes; \n\n Local integration: For former combatants who are protected as refugees and therefore cannot be repatriated, the best option will be local integration, since options for third\u00ad country resettlement are likely to be limited. UNHCR negotiates with countries of asylum for local integration, and this process should be supported by UN missions and agencies. Local integration involves: \n Legal processes: Refugees are granted an increasingly wider range of rights and entitlements identical to those enjoyed by other citizens, e.g., freedom of move\u00ad ment; family reunification in the country of asylum; access to education, the labour market, public relief and assistance, including health facilities; the possibility of acquiring and disposing of property; and the capacity to travel out of and return to the country of asylum with valid travel and identity documents. This process should gradually lead to permanent residence rights and the option to apply for citizenship in accordance with national laws; \n Economic processes: Refugees become increasingly less reliant on humanitarian assistance or State aid, achieving a growing degree of self\u00adreliance and having permanent jobs, thus contributing to the economic life of the host country; \n Social and cultural processes: These are interactive processes involving refugees feeling more and more at home in their new country, and local communities accept\u00ad ing their presence with greater ease, which allow refugees to live among the host population without fear of discrimination and contribute actively to the social life of their country of asylum; \n\n Resettlement: Third\u00adcountry resettlement may be appropriate for certain refugees who were formerly combatants, e.g., where the refugee has protection needs that cannot be met in the country of asylum, is unlikely to integrate into the host country, etc. However, despite UNHCR advocacy for assistance from the international community, it is often difficult to find resettlement opportunities for refugees who were former combatants. Some resettlement countries do not take former combatants, with sometimes varying definitions of what exactly a former combatant is. Therefore, resettlement to a third coun\u00ad try is unlikely to be a viable option for large numbers of former combatants, although it may be a solution in individual cases. The fact that very few countries take former com\u00ad batants could be used to encourage the host country to accept them for local integration.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -165324,14 +165324,14 @@ "Heading2": "13.2. Sustainable plans for the future", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "These could be: \\n\\n Repatriation: Voluntary, safe and dignified repatriation to the country of origin at the end of the conflict or other event that gave rise to refugee claims is considered the best response for most population influxes; \\n\\n Local integration: For former combatants who are protected as refugees and therefore cannot be repatriated, the best option will be local integration, since options for third\u00ad country resettlement are likely to be limited.", + "Sentence": "These could be: \n\n Repatriation: Voluntary, safe and dignified repatriation to the country of origin at the end of the conflict or other event that gave rise to refugee claims is considered the best response for most population influxes; \n\n Local integration: For former combatants who are protected as refugees and therefore cannot be repatriated, the best option will be local integration, since options for third\u00ad country resettlement are likely to be limited.", "newParagraph": "determining refugee status must linked making sustainable long term future plan former combatant could nn repatriation voluntary safe dignified repatriation country origin end conflict event gave rise refugee claim considered best response population influx nn local integration former combatant protected refugee therefore cannot repatriated best option local integration since option third country resettlement likely limited unhcr negotiates country asylum local integration process supported un mission agency local integration involves n legal process refugee granted increasingly wider range right entitlement identical enjoyed citizen eg freedom move ment family reunification country asylum access education labour market public relief assistance including health facility possibility acquiring disposing property capacity travel return country asylum valid travel identity document process gradually lead permanent residence right option apply citizenship accordance national law n economic process refugee become increasingly le reliant humanitarian assistance state aid achieving growing degree self reliance permanent job thus contributing economic life host country n social cultural process interactive process involving refugee feeling home new country local community accept ing presence greater ease allow refugee live among host population without fear discrimination contribute actively social life country asylum nn resettlement third country resettlement may appropriate certain refugee formerly combatant eg refugee protection need cannot met country asylum unlikely integrate host country etc however despite unhcr advocacy assistance international community often difficult find resettlement opportunity refugee former combatant resettlement country take former combatant sometimes varying definition exactly former combatant therefore resettlement third coun try unlikely viable option large number former combatant although may solution individual case fact country take former com batants could used encourage host country accept local integration", "ProcessedSent": "could nn repatriation voluntary safe dignified repatriation country origin end conflict event gave rise refugee claim considered best response population influx nn local integration former combatant protected refugee therefore cannot repatriated best option local integration since option third country resettlement likely limited", "SentID": 9184 }, { "ParagraphID": 2661, - "Paragraph": "Determining refugee status must be linked to making sustainable long\u00adterm future plans for former combatants. These could be: \\n\\n Repatriation: Voluntary, safe and dignified repatriation to the country of origin at the end of the conflict or other event that gave rise to refugee claims is considered the best response for most population influxes; \\n\\n Local integration: For former combatants who are protected as refugees and therefore cannot be repatriated, the best option will be local integration, since options for third\u00ad country resettlement are likely to be limited. UNHCR negotiates with countries of asylum for local integration, and this process should be supported by UN missions and agencies. Local integration involves: \\n Legal processes: Refugees are granted an increasingly wider range of rights and entitlements identical to those enjoyed by other citizens, e.g., freedom of move\u00ad ment; family reunification in the country of asylum; access to education, the labour market, public relief and assistance, including health facilities; the possibility of acquiring and disposing of property; and the capacity to travel out of and return to the country of asylum with valid travel and identity documents. This process should gradually lead to permanent residence rights and the option to apply for citizenship in accordance with national laws; \\n Economic processes: Refugees become increasingly less reliant on humanitarian assistance or State aid, achieving a growing degree of self\u00adreliance and having permanent jobs, thus contributing to the economic life of the host country; \\n Social and cultural processes: These are interactive processes involving refugees feeling more and more at home in their new country, and local communities accept\u00ad ing their presence with greater ease, which allow refugees to live among the host population without fear of discrimination and contribute actively to the social life of their country of asylum; \\n\\n Resettlement: Third\u00adcountry resettlement may be appropriate for certain refugees who were formerly combatants, e.g., where the refugee has protection needs that cannot be met in the country of asylum, is unlikely to integrate into the host country, etc. However, despite UNHCR advocacy for assistance from the international community, it is often difficult to find resettlement opportunities for refugees who were former combatants. Some resettlement countries do not take former combatants, with sometimes varying definitions of what exactly a former combatant is. Therefore, resettlement to a third coun\u00ad try is unlikely to be a viable option for large numbers of former combatants, although it may be a solution in individual cases. The fact that very few countries take former com\u00ad batants could be used to encourage the host country to accept them for local integration.", + "Paragraph": "Determining refugee status must be linked to making sustainable long\u00adterm future plans for former combatants. These could be: \n\n Repatriation: Voluntary, safe and dignified repatriation to the country of origin at the end of the conflict or other event that gave rise to refugee claims is considered the best response for most population influxes; \n\n Local integration: For former combatants who are protected as refugees and therefore cannot be repatriated, the best option will be local integration, since options for third\u00ad country resettlement are likely to be limited. UNHCR negotiates with countries of asylum for local integration, and this process should be supported by UN missions and agencies. Local integration involves: \n Legal processes: Refugees are granted an increasingly wider range of rights and entitlements identical to those enjoyed by other citizens, e.g., freedom of move\u00ad ment; family reunification in the country of asylum; access to education, the labour market, public relief and assistance, including health facilities; the possibility of acquiring and disposing of property; and the capacity to travel out of and return to the country of asylum with valid travel and identity documents. This process should gradually lead to permanent residence rights and the option to apply for citizenship in accordance with national laws; \n Economic processes: Refugees become increasingly less reliant on humanitarian assistance or State aid, achieving a growing degree of self\u00adreliance and having permanent jobs, thus contributing to the economic life of the host country; \n Social and cultural processes: These are interactive processes involving refugees feeling more and more at home in their new country, and local communities accept\u00ad ing their presence with greater ease, which allow refugees to live among the host population without fear of discrimination and contribute actively to the social life of their country of asylum; \n\n Resettlement: Third\u00adcountry resettlement may be appropriate for certain refugees who were formerly combatants, e.g., where the refugee has protection needs that cannot be met in the country of asylum, is unlikely to integrate into the host country, etc. However, despite UNHCR advocacy for assistance from the international community, it is often difficult to find resettlement opportunities for refugees who were former combatants. Some resettlement countries do not take former combatants, with sometimes varying definitions of what exactly a former combatant is. Therefore, resettlement to a third coun\u00ad try is unlikely to be a viable option for large numbers of former combatants, although it may be a solution in individual cases. The fact that very few countries take former com\u00ad batants could be used to encourage the host country to accept them for local integration.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -165349,7 +165349,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2661, - "Paragraph": "Determining refugee status must be linked to making sustainable long\u00adterm future plans for former combatants. These could be: \\n\\n Repatriation: Voluntary, safe and dignified repatriation to the country of origin at the end of the conflict or other event that gave rise to refugee claims is considered the best response for most population influxes; \\n\\n Local integration: For former combatants who are protected as refugees and therefore cannot be repatriated, the best option will be local integration, since options for third\u00ad country resettlement are likely to be limited. UNHCR negotiates with countries of asylum for local integration, and this process should be supported by UN missions and agencies. Local integration involves: \\n Legal processes: Refugees are granted an increasingly wider range of rights and entitlements identical to those enjoyed by other citizens, e.g., freedom of move\u00ad ment; family reunification in the country of asylum; access to education, the labour market, public relief and assistance, including health facilities; the possibility of acquiring and disposing of property; and the capacity to travel out of and return to the country of asylum with valid travel and identity documents. This process should gradually lead to permanent residence rights and the option to apply for citizenship in accordance with national laws; \\n Economic processes: Refugees become increasingly less reliant on humanitarian assistance or State aid, achieving a growing degree of self\u00adreliance and having permanent jobs, thus contributing to the economic life of the host country; \\n Social and cultural processes: These are interactive processes involving refugees feeling more and more at home in their new country, and local communities accept\u00ad ing their presence with greater ease, which allow refugees to live among the host population without fear of discrimination and contribute actively to the social life of their country of asylum; \\n\\n Resettlement: Third\u00adcountry resettlement may be appropriate for certain refugees who were formerly combatants, e.g., where the refugee has protection needs that cannot be met in the country of asylum, is unlikely to integrate into the host country, etc. However, despite UNHCR advocacy for assistance from the international community, it is often difficult to find resettlement opportunities for refugees who were former combatants. Some resettlement countries do not take former combatants, with sometimes varying definitions of what exactly a former combatant is. Therefore, resettlement to a third coun\u00ad try is unlikely to be a viable option for large numbers of former combatants, although it may be a solution in individual cases. The fact that very few countries take former com\u00ad batants could be used to encourage the host country to accept them for local integration.", + "Paragraph": "Determining refugee status must be linked to making sustainable long\u00adterm future plans for former combatants. These could be: \n\n Repatriation: Voluntary, safe and dignified repatriation to the country of origin at the end of the conflict or other event that gave rise to refugee claims is considered the best response for most population influxes; \n\n Local integration: For former combatants who are protected as refugees and therefore cannot be repatriated, the best option will be local integration, since options for third\u00ad country resettlement are likely to be limited. UNHCR negotiates with countries of asylum for local integration, and this process should be supported by UN missions and agencies. Local integration involves: \n Legal processes: Refugees are granted an increasingly wider range of rights and entitlements identical to those enjoyed by other citizens, e.g., freedom of move\u00ad ment; family reunification in the country of asylum; access to education, the labour market, public relief and assistance, including health facilities; the possibility of acquiring and disposing of property; and the capacity to travel out of and return to the country of asylum with valid travel and identity documents. This process should gradually lead to permanent residence rights and the option to apply for citizenship in accordance with national laws; \n Economic processes: Refugees become increasingly less reliant on humanitarian assistance or State aid, achieving a growing degree of self\u00adreliance and having permanent jobs, thus contributing to the economic life of the host country; \n Social and cultural processes: These are interactive processes involving refugees feeling more and more at home in their new country, and local communities accept\u00ad ing their presence with greater ease, which allow refugees to live among the host population without fear of discrimination and contribute actively to the social life of their country of asylum; \n\n Resettlement: Third\u00adcountry resettlement may be appropriate for certain refugees who were formerly combatants, e.g., where the refugee has protection needs that cannot be met in the country of asylum, is unlikely to integrate into the host country, etc. However, despite UNHCR advocacy for assistance from the international community, it is often difficult to find resettlement opportunities for refugees who were former combatants. Some resettlement countries do not take former combatants, with sometimes varying definitions of what exactly a former combatant is. Therefore, resettlement to a third coun\u00ad try is unlikely to be a viable option for large numbers of former combatants, although it may be a solution in individual cases. The fact that very few countries take former com\u00ad batants could be used to encourage the host country to accept them for local integration.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -165360,14 +165360,14 @@ "Heading2": "13.2. Sustainable plans for the future", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Local integration involves: \\n Legal processes: Refugees are granted an increasingly wider range of rights and entitlements identical to those enjoyed by other citizens, e.g., freedom of move\u00ad ment; family reunification in the country of asylum; access to education, the labour market, public relief and assistance, including health facilities; the possibility of acquiring and disposing of property; and the capacity to travel out of and return to the country of asylum with valid travel and identity documents.", + "Sentence": "Local integration involves: \n Legal processes: Refugees are granted an increasingly wider range of rights and entitlements identical to those enjoyed by other citizens, e.g., freedom of move\u00ad ment; family reunification in the country of asylum; access to education, the labour market, public relief and assistance, including health facilities; the possibility of acquiring and disposing of property; and the capacity to travel out of and return to the country of asylum with valid travel and identity documents.", "newParagraph": "determining refugee status must linked making sustainable long term future plan former combatant could nn repatriation voluntary safe dignified repatriation country origin end conflict event gave rise refugee claim considered best response population influx nn local integration former combatant protected refugee therefore cannot repatriated best option local integration since option third country resettlement likely limited unhcr negotiates country asylum local integration process supported un mission agency local integration involves n legal process refugee granted increasingly wider range right entitlement identical enjoyed citizen eg freedom move ment family reunification country asylum access education labour market public relief assistance including health facility possibility acquiring disposing property capacity travel return country asylum valid travel identity document process gradually lead permanent residence right option apply citizenship accordance national law n economic process refugee become increasingly le reliant humanitarian assistance state aid achieving growing degree self reliance permanent job thus contributing economic life host country n social cultural process interactive process involving refugee feeling home new country local community accept ing presence greater ease allow refugee live among host population without fear discrimination contribute actively social life country asylum nn resettlement third country resettlement may appropriate certain refugee formerly combatant eg refugee protection need cannot met country asylum unlikely integrate host country etc however despite unhcr advocacy assistance international community often difficult find resettlement opportunity refugee former combatant resettlement country take former combatant sometimes varying definition exactly former combatant therefore resettlement third coun try unlikely viable option large number former combatant although may solution individual case fact country take former com batants could used encourage host country accept local integration", "ProcessedSent": "local integration involves n legal process refugee granted increasingly wider range right entitlement identical enjoyed citizen eg freedom move ment family reunification country asylum access education labour market public relief assistance including health facility possibility acquiring disposing property capacity travel return country asylum valid travel identity document", "SentID": 9186 }, { "ParagraphID": 2661, - "Paragraph": "Determining refugee status must be linked to making sustainable long\u00adterm future plans for former combatants. These could be: \\n\\n Repatriation: Voluntary, safe and dignified repatriation to the country of origin at the end of the conflict or other event that gave rise to refugee claims is considered the best response for most population influxes; \\n\\n Local integration: For former combatants who are protected as refugees and therefore cannot be repatriated, the best option will be local integration, since options for third\u00ad country resettlement are likely to be limited. UNHCR negotiates with countries of asylum for local integration, and this process should be supported by UN missions and agencies. Local integration involves: \\n Legal processes: Refugees are granted an increasingly wider range of rights and entitlements identical to those enjoyed by other citizens, e.g., freedom of move\u00ad ment; family reunification in the country of asylum; access to education, the labour market, public relief and assistance, including health facilities; the possibility of acquiring and disposing of property; and the capacity to travel out of and return to the country of asylum with valid travel and identity documents. This process should gradually lead to permanent residence rights and the option to apply for citizenship in accordance with national laws; \\n Economic processes: Refugees become increasingly less reliant on humanitarian assistance or State aid, achieving a growing degree of self\u00adreliance and having permanent jobs, thus contributing to the economic life of the host country; \\n Social and cultural processes: These are interactive processes involving refugees feeling more and more at home in their new country, and local communities accept\u00ad ing their presence with greater ease, which allow refugees to live among the host population without fear of discrimination and contribute actively to the social life of their country of asylum; \\n\\n Resettlement: Third\u00adcountry resettlement may be appropriate for certain refugees who were formerly combatants, e.g., where the refugee has protection needs that cannot be met in the country of asylum, is unlikely to integrate into the host country, etc. However, despite UNHCR advocacy for assistance from the international community, it is often difficult to find resettlement opportunities for refugees who were former combatants. Some resettlement countries do not take former combatants, with sometimes varying definitions of what exactly a former combatant is. Therefore, resettlement to a third coun\u00ad try is unlikely to be a viable option for large numbers of former combatants, although it may be a solution in individual cases. The fact that very few countries take former com\u00ad batants could be used to encourage the host country to accept them for local integration.", + "Paragraph": "Determining refugee status must be linked to making sustainable long\u00adterm future plans for former combatants. These could be: \n\n Repatriation: Voluntary, safe and dignified repatriation to the country of origin at the end of the conflict or other event that gave rise to refugee claims is considered the best response for most population influxes; \n\n Local integration: For former combatants who are protected as refugees and therefore cannot be repatriated, the best option will be local integration, since options for third\u00ad country resettlement are likely to be limited. UNHCR negotiates with countries of asylum for local integration, and this process should be supported by UN missions and agencies. Local integration involves: \n Legal processes: Refugees are granted an increasingly wider range of rights and entitlements identical to those enjoyed by other citizens, e.g., freedom of move\u00ad ment; family reunification in the country of asylum; access to education, the labour market, public relief and assistance, including health facilities; the possibility of acquiring and disposing of property; and the capacity to travel out of and return to the country of asylum with valid travel and identity documents. This process should gradually lead to permanent residence rights and the option to apply for citizenship in accordance with national laws; \n Economic processes: Refugees become increasingly less reliant on humanitarian assistance or State aid, achieving a growing degree of self\u00adreliance and having permanent jobs, thus contributing to the economic life of the host country; \n Social and cultural processes: These are interactive processes involving refugees feeling more and more at home in their new country, and local communities accept\u00ad ing their presence with greater ease, which allow refugees to live among the host population without fear of discrimination and contribute actively to the social life of their country of asylum; \n\n Resettlement: Third\u00adcountry resettlement may be appropriate for certain refugees who were formerly combatants, e.g., where the refugee has protection needs that cannot be met in the country of asylum, is unlikely to integrate into the host country, etc. However, despite UNHCR advocacy for assistance from the international community, it is often difficult to find resettlement opportunities for refugees who were former combatants. Some resettlement countries do not take former combatants, with sometimes varying definitions of what exactly a former combatant is. Therefore, resettlement to a third coun\u00ad try is unlikely to be a viable option for large numbers of former combatants, although it may be a solution in individual cases. The fact that very few countries take former com\u00ad batants could be used to encourage the host country to accept them for local integration.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -165378,14 +165378,14 @@ "Heading2": "13.2. Sustainable plans for the future", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This process should gradually lead to permanent residence rights and the option to apply for citizenship in accordance with national laws; \\n Economic processes: Refugees become increasingly less reliant on humanitarian assistance or State aid, achieving a growing degree of self\u00adreliance and having permanent jobs, thus contributing to the economic life of the host country; \\n Social and cultural processes: These are interactive processes involving refugees feeling more and more at home in their new country, and local communities accept\u00ad ing their presence with greater ease, which allow refugees to live among the host population without fear of discrimination and contribute actively to the social life of their country of asylum; \\n\\n Resettlement: Third\u00adcountry resettlement may be appropriate for certain refugees who were formerly combatants, e.g., where the refugee has protection needs that cannot be met in the country of asylum, is unlikely to integrate into the host country, etc.", + "Sentence": "This process should gradually lead to permanent residence rights and the option to apply for citizenship in accordance with national laws; \n Economic processes: Refugees become increasingly less reliant on humanitarian assistance or State aid, achieving a growing degree of self\u00adreliance and having permanent jobs, thus contributing to the economic life of the host country; \n Social and cultural processes: These are interactive processes involving refugees feeling more and more at home in their new country, and local communities accept\u00ad ing their presence with greater ease, which allow refugees to live among the host population without fear of discrimination and contribute actively to the social life of their country of asylum; \n\n Resettlement: Third\u00adcountry resettlement may be appropriate for certain refugees who were formerly combatants, e.g., where the refugee has protection needs that cannot be met in the country of asylum, is unlikely to integrate into the host country, etc.", "newParagraph": "determining refugee status must linked making sustainable long term future plan former combatant could nn repatriation voluntary safe dignified repatriation country origin end conflict event gave rise refugee claim considered best response population influx nn local integration former combatant protected refugee therefore cannot repatriated best option local integration since option third country resettlement likely limited unhcr negotiates country asylum local integration process supported un mission agency local integration involves n legal process refugee granted increasingly wider range right entitlement identical enjoyed citizen eg freedom move ment family reunification country asylum access education labour market public relief assistance including health facility possibility acquiring disposing property capacity travel return country asylum valid travel identity document process gradually lead permanent residence right option apply citizenship accordance national law n economic process refugee become increasingly le reliant humanitarian assistance state aid achieving growing degree self reliance permanent job thus contributing economic life host country n social cultural process interactive process involving refugee feeling home new country local community accept ing presence greater ease allow refugee live among host population without fear discrimination contribute actively social life country asylum nn resettlement third country resettlement may appropriate certain refugee formerly combatant eg refugee protection need cannot met country asylum unlikely integrate host country etc however despite unhcr advocacy assistance international community often difficult find resettlement opportunity refugee former combatant resettlement country take former combatant sometimes varying definition exactly former combatant therefore resettlement third coun try unlikely viable option large number former combatant although may solution individual case fact country take former com batants could used encourage host country accept local integration", "ProcessedSent": "process gradually lead permanent residence right option apply citizenship accordance national law n economic process refugee become increasingly le reliant humanitarian assistance state aid achieving growing degree self reliance permanent job thus contributing economic life host country n social cultural process interactive process involving refugee feeling home new country local community accept ing presence greater ease allow refugee live among host population without fear discrimination contribute actively social life country asylum nn resettlement third country resettlement may appropriate certain refugee formerly combatant eg refugee protection need cannot met country asylum unlikely integrate host country etc", "SentID": 9187 }, { "ParagraphID": 2661, - "Paragraph": "Determining refugee status must be linked to making sustainable long\u00adterm future plans for former combatants. These could be: \\n\\n Repatriation: Voluntary, safe and dignified repatriation to the country of origin at the end of the conflict or other event that gave rise to refugee claims is considered the best response for most population influxes; \\n\\n Local integration: For former combatants who are protected as refugees and therefore cannot be repatriated, the best option will be local integration, since options for third\u00ad country resettlement are likely to be limited. UNHCR negotiates with countries of asylum for local integration, and this process should be supported by UN missions and agencies. Local integration involves: \\n Legal processes: Refugees are granted an increasingly wider range of rights and entitlements identical to those enjoyed by other citizens, e.g., freedom of move\u00ad ment; family reunification in the country of asylum; access to education, the labour market, public relief and assistance, including health facilities; the possibility of acquiring and disposing of property; and the capacity to travel out of and return to the country of asylum with valid travel and identity documents. This process should gradually lead to permanent residence rights and the option to apply for citizenship in accordance with national laws; \\n Economic processes: Refugees become increasingly less reliant on humanitarian assistance or State aid, achieving a growing degree of self\u00adreliance and having permanent jobs, thus contributing to the economic life of the host country; \\n Social and cultural processes: These are interactive processes involving refugees feeling more and more at home in their new country, and local communities accept\u00ad ing their presence with greater ease, which allow refugees to live among the host population without fear of discrimination and contribute actively to the social life of their country of asylum; \\n\\n Resettlement: Third\u00adcountry resettlement may be appropriate for certain refugees who were formerly combatants, e.g., where the refugee has protection needs that cannot be met in the country of asylum, is unlikely to integrate into the host country, etc. However, despite UNHCR advocacy for assistance from the international community, it is often difficult to find resettlement opportunities for refugees who were former combatants. Some resettlement countries do not take former combatants, with sometimes varying definitions of what exactly a former combatant is. Therefore, resettlement to a third coun\u00ad try is unlikely to be a viable option for large numbers of former combatants, although it may be a solution in individual cases. The fact that very few countries take former com\u00ad batants could be used to encourage the host country to accept them for local integration.", + "Paragraph": "Determining refugee status must be linked to making sustainable long\u00adterm future plans for former combatants. These could be: \n\n Repatriation: Voluntary, safe and dignified repatriation to the country of origin at the end of the conflict or other event that gave rise to refugee claims is considered the best response for most population influxes; \n\n Local integration: For former combatants who are protected as refugees and therefore cannot be repatriated, the best option will be local integration, since options for third\u00ad country resettlement are likely to be limited. UNHCR negotiates with countries of asylum for local integration, and this process should be supported by UN missions and agencies. Local integration involves: \n Legal processes: Refugees are granted an increasingly wider range of rights and entitlements identical to those enjoyed by other citizens, e.g., freedom of move\u00ad ment; family reunification in the country of asylum; access to education, the labour market, public relief and assistance, including health facilities; the possibility of acquiring and disposing of property; and the capacity to travel out of and return to the country of asylum with valid travel and identity documents. This process should gradually lead to permanent residence rights and the option to apply for citizenship in accordance with national laws; \n Economic processes: Refugees become increasingly less reliant on humanitarian assistance or State aid, achieving a growing degree of self\u00adreliance and having permanent jobs, thus contributing to the economic life of the host country; \n Social and cultural processes: These are interactive processes involving refugees feeling more and more at home in their new country, and local communities accept\u00ad ing their presence with greater ease, which allow refugees to live among the host population without fear of discrimination and contribute actively to the social life of their country of asylum; \n\n Resettlement: Third\u00adcountry resettlement may be appropriate for certain refugees who were formerly combatants, e.g., where the refugee has protection needs that cannot be met in the country of asylum, is unlikely to integrate into the host country, etc. However, despite UNHCR advocacy for assistance from the international community, it is often difficult to find resettlement opportunities for refugees who were former combatants. Some resettlement countries do not take former combatants, with sometimes varying definitions of what exactly a former combatant is. Therefore, resettlement to a third coun\u00ad try is unlikely to be a viable option for large numbers of former combatants, although it may be a solution in individual cases. The fact that very few countries take former com\u00ad batants could be used to encourage the host country to accept them for local integration.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -165403,7 +165403,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2661, - "Paragraph": "Determining refugee status must be linked to making sustainable long\u00adterm future plans for former combatants. These could be: \\n\\n Repatriation: Voluntary, safe and dignified repatriation to the country of origin at the end of the conflict or other event that gave rise to refugee claims is considered the best response for most population influxes; \\n\\n Local integration: For former combatants who are protected as refugees and therefore cannot be repatriated, the best option will be local integration, since options for third\u00ad country resettlement are likely to be limited. UNHCR negotiates with countries of asylum for local integration, and this process should be supported by UN missions and agencies. Local integration involves: \\n Legal processes: Refugees are granted an increasingly wider range of rights and entitlements identical to those enjoyed by other citizens, e.g., freedom of move\u00ad ment; family reunification in the country of asylum; access to education, the labour market, public relief and assistance, including health facilities; the possibility of acquiring and disposing of property; and the capacity to travel out of and return to the country of asylum with valid travel and identity documents. This process should gradually lead to permanent residence rights and the option to apply for citizenship in accordance with national laws; \\n Economic processes: Refugees become increasingly less reliant on humanitarian assistance or State aid, achieving a growing degree of self\u00adreliance and having permanent jobs, thus contributing to the economic life of the host country; \\n Social and cultural processes: These are interactive processes involving refugees feeling more and more at home in their new country, and local communities accept\u00ad ing their presence with greater ease, which allow refugees to live among the host population without fear of discrimination and contribute actively to the social life of their country of asylum; \\n\\n Resettlement: Third\u00adcountry resettlement may be appropriate for certain refugees who were formerly combatants, e.g., where the refugee has protection needs that cannot be met in the country of asylum, is unlikely to integrate into the host country, etc. However, despite UNHCR advocacy for assistance from the international community, it is often difficult to find resettlement opportunities for refugees who were former combatants. Some resettlement countries do not take former combatants, with sometimes varying definitions of what exactly a former combatant is. Therefore, resettlement to a third coun\u00ad try is unlikely to be a viable option for large numbers of former combatants, although it may be a solution in individual cases. The fact that very few countries take former com\u00ad batants could be used to encourage the host country to accept them for local integration.", + "Paragraph": "Determining refugee status must be linked to making sustainable long\u00adterm future plans for former combatants. These could be: \n\n Repatriation: Voluntary, safe and dignified repatriation to the country of origin at the end of the conflict or other event that gave rise to refugee claims is considered the best response for most population influxes; \n\n Local integration: For former combatants who are protected as refugees and therefore cannot be repatriated, the best option will be local integration, since options for third\u00ad country resettlement are likely to be limited. UNHCR negotiates with countries of asylum for local integration, and this process should be supported by UN missions and agencies. Local integration involves: \n Legal processes: Refugees are granted an increasingly wider range of rights and entitlements identical to those enjoyed by other citizens, e.g., freedom of move\u00ad ment; family reunification in the country of asylum; access to education, the labour market, public relief and assistance, including health facilities; the possibility of acquiring and disposing of property; and the capacity to travel out of and return to the country of asylum with valid travel and identity documents. This process should gradually lead to permanent residence rights and the option to apply for citizenship in accordance with national laws; \n Economic processes: Refugees become increasingly less reliant on humanitarian assistance or State aid, achieving a growing degree of self\u00adreliance and having permanent jobs, thus contributing to the economic life of the host country; \n Social and cultural processes: These are interactive processes involving refugees feeling more and more at home in their new country, and local communities accept\u00ad ing their presence with greater ease, which allow refugees to live among the host population without fear of discrimination and contribute actively to the social life of their country of asylum; \n\n Resettlement: Third\u00adcountry resettlement may be appropriate for certain refugees who were formerly combatants, e.g., where the refugee has protection needs that cannot be met in the country of asylum, is unlikely to integrate into the host country, etc. However, despite UNHCR advocacy for assistance from the international community, it is often difficult to find resettlement opportunities for refugees who were former combatants. Some resettlement countries do not take former combatants, with sometimes varying definitions of what exactly a former combatant is. Therefore, resettlement to a third coun\u00ad try is unlikely to be a viable option for large numbers of former combatants, although it may be a solution in individual cases. The fact that very few countries take former com\u00ad batants could be used to encourage the host country to accept them for local integration.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -165421,7 +165421,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2661, - "Paragraph": "Determining refugee status must be linked to making sustainable long\u00adterm future plans for former combatants. These could be: \\n\\n Repatriation: Voluntary, safe and dignified repatriation to the country of origin at the end of the conflict or other event that gave rise to refugee claims is considered the best response for most population influxes; \\n\\n Local integration: For former combatants who are protected as refugees and therefore cannot be repatriated, the best option will be local integration, since options for third\u00ad country resettlement are likely to be limited. UNHCR negotiates with countries of asylum for local integration, and this process should be supported by UN missions and agencies. Local integration involves: \\n Legal processes: Refugees are granted an increasingly wider range of rights and entitlements identical to those enjoyed by other citizens, e.g., freedom of move\u00ad ment; family reunification in the country of asylum; access to education, the labour market, public relief and assistance, including health facilities; the possibility of acquiring and disposing of property; and the capacity to travel out of and return to the country of asylum with valid travel and identity documents. This process should gradually lead to permanent residence rights and the option to apply for citizenship in accordance with national laws; \\n Economic processes: Refugees become increasingly less reliant on humanitarian assistance or State aid, achieving a growing degree of self\u00adreliance and having permanent jobs, thus contributing to the economic life of the host country; \\n Social and cultural processes: These are interactive processes involving refugees feeling more and more at home in their new country, and local communities accept\u00ad ing their presence with greater ease, which allow refugees to live among the host population without fear of discrimination and contribute actively to the social life of their country of asylum; \\n\\n Resettlement: Third\u00adcountry resettlement may be appropriate for certain refugees who were formerly combatants, e.g., where the refugee has protection needs that cannot be met in the country of asylum, is unlikely to integrate into the host country, etc. However, despite UNHCR advocacy for assistance from the international community, it is often difficult to find resettlement opportunities for refugees who were former combatants. Some resettlement countries do not take former combatants, with sometimes varying definitions of what exactly a former combatant is. Therefore, resettlement to a third coun\u00ad try is unlikely to be a viable option for large numbers of former combatants, although it may be a solution in individual cases. The fact that very few countries take former com\u00ad batants could be used to encourage the host country to accept them for local integration.", + "Paragraph": "Determining refugee status must be linked to making sustainable long\u00adterm future plans for former combatants. These could be: \n\n Repatriation: Voluntary, safe and dignified repatriation to the country of origin at the end of the conflict or other event that gave rise to refugee claims is considered the best response for most population influxes; \n\n Local integration: For former combatants who are protected as refugees and therefore cannot be repatriated, the best option will be local integration, since options for third\u00ad country resettlement are likely to be limited. UNHCR negotiates with countries of asylum for local integration, and this process should be supported by UN missions and agencies. Local integration involves: \n Legal processes: Refugees are granted an increasingly wider range of rights and entitlements identical to those enjoyed by other citizens, e.g., freedom of move\u00ad ment; family reunification in the country of asylum; access to education, the labour market, public relief and assistance, including health facilities; the possibility of acquiring and disposing of property; and the capacity to travel out of and return to the country of asylum with valid travel and identity documents. This process should gradually lead to permanent residence rights and the option to apply for citizenship in accordance with national laws; \n Economic processes: Refugees become increasingly less reliant on humanitarian assistance or State aid, achieving a growing degree of self\u00adreliance and having permanent jobs, thus contributing to the economic life of the host country; \n Social and cultural processes: These are interactive processes involving refugees feeling more and more at home in their new country, and local communities accept\u00ad ing their presence with greater ease, which allow refugees to live among the host population without fear of discrimination and contribute actively to the social life of their country of asylum; \n\n Resettlement: Third\u00adcountry resettlement may be appropriate for certain refugees who were formerly combatants, e.g., where the refugee has protection needs that cannot be met in the country of asylum, is unlikely to integrate into the host country, etc. However, despite UNHCR advocacy for assistance from the international community, it is often difficult to find resettlement opportunities for refugees who were former combatants. Some resettlement countries do not take former combatants, with sometimes varying definitions of what exactly a former combatant is. Therefore, resettlement to a third coun\u00ad try is unlikely to be a viable option for large numbers of former combatants, although it may be a solution in individual cases. The fact that very few countries take former com\u00ad batants could be used to encourage the host country to accept them for local integration.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -165439,7 +165439,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2661, - "Paragraph": "Determining refugee status must be linked to making sustainable long\u00adterm future plans for former combatants. These could be: \\n\\n Repatriation: Voluntary, safe and dignified repatriation to the country of origin at the end of the conflict or other event that gave rise to refugee claims is considered the best response for most population influxes; \\n\\n Local integration: For former combatants who are protected as refugees and therefore cannot be repatriated, the best option will be local integration, since options for third\u00ad country resettlement are likely to be limited. UNHCR negotiates with countries of asylum for local integration, and this process should be supported by UN missions and agencies. Local integration involves: \\n Legal processes: Refugees are granted an increasingly wider range of rights and entitlements identical to those enjoyed by other citizens, e.g., freedom of move\u00ad ment; family reunification in the country of asylum; access to education, the labour market, public relief and assistance, including health facilities; the possibility of acquiring and disposing of property; and the capacity to travel out of and return to the country of asylum with valid travel and identity documents. This process should gradually lead to permanent residence rights and the option to apply for citizenship in accordance with national laws; \\n Economic processes: Refugees become increasingly less reliant on humanitarian assistance or State aid, achieving a growing degree of self\u00adreliance and having permanent jobs, thus contributing to the economic life of the host country; \\n Social and cultural processes: These are interactive processes involving refugees feeling more and more at home in their new country, and local communities accept\u00ad ing their presence with greater ease, which allow refugees to live among the host population without fear of discrimination and contribute actively to the social life of their country of asylum; \\n\\n Resettlement: Third\u00adcountry resettlement may be appropriate for certain refugees who were formerly combatants, e.g., where the refugee has protection needs that cannot be met in the country of asylum, is unlikely to integrate into the host country, etc. However, despite UNHCR advocacy for assistance from the international community, it is often difficult to find resettlement opportunities for refugees who were former combatants. Some resettlement countries do not take former combatants, with sometimes varying definitions of what exactly a former combatant is. Therefore, resettlement to a third coun\u00ad try is unlikely to be a viable option for large numbers of former combatants, although it may be a solution in individual cases. The fact that very few countries take former com\u00ad batants could be used to encourage the host country to accept them for local integration.", + "Paragraph": "Determining refugee status must be linked to making sustainable long\u00adterm future plans for former combatants. These could be: \n\n Repatriation: Voluntary, safe and dignified repatriation to the country of origin at the end of the conflict or other event that gave rise to refugee claims is considered the best response for most population influxes; \n\n Local integration: For former combatants who are protected as refugees and therefore cannot be repatriated, the best option will be local integration, since options for third\u00ad country resettlement are likely to be limited. UNHCR negotiates with countries of asylum for local integration, and this process should be supported by UN missions and agencies. Local integration involves: \n Legal processes: Refugees are granted an increasingly wider range of rights and entitlements identical to those enjoyed by other citizens, e.g., freedom of move\u00ad ment; family reunification in the country of asylum; access to education, the labour market, public relief and assistance, including health facilities; the possibility of acquiring and disposing of property; and the capacity to travel out of and return to the country of asylum with valid travel and identity documents. This process should gradually lead to permanent residence rights and the option to apply for citizenship in accordance with national laws; \n Economic processes: Refugees become increasingly less reliant on humanitarian assistance or State aid, achieving a growing degree of self\u00adreliance and having permanent jobs, thus contributing to the economic life of the host country; \n Social and cultural processes: These are interactive processes involving refugees feeling more and more at home in their new country, and local communities accept\u00ad ing their presence with greater ease, which allow refugees to live among the host population without fear of discrimination and contribute actively to the social life of their country of asylum; \n\n Resettlement: Third\u00adcountry resettlement may be appropriate for certain refugees who were formerly combatants, e.g., where the refugee has protection needs that cannot be met in the country of asylum, is unlikely to integrate into the host country, etc. However, despite UNHCR advocacy for assistance from the international community, it is often difficult to find resettlement opportunities for refugees who were former combatants. Some resettlement countries do not take former combatants, with sometimes varying definitions of what exactly a former combatant is. Therefore, resettlement to a third coun\u00ad try is unlikely to be a viable option for large numbers of former combatants, although it may be a solution in individual cases. The fact that very few countries take former com\u00ad batants could be used to encourage the host country to accept them for local integration.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -165655,7 +165655,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2666, - "Paragraph": "Refugee status determination for former combatants involves establishing three facts: \\n that they have genuinely and permanently given up arms and become civilians; \\n that they meet the definition of a refugee under the 1951 UN Refugee Convention or regional instruments; \\n that they are not excluded from being protected as refugees, according to the exclusion clauses of refugee conventions.", + "Paragraph": "Refugee status determination for former combatants involves establishing three facts: \n that they have genuinely and permanently given up arms and become civilians; \n that they meet the definition of a refugee under the 1951 UN Refugee Convention or regional instruments; \n that they are not excluded from being protected as refugees, according to the exclusion clauses of refugee conventions.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -165666,7 +165666,7 @@ "Heading2": "13.3. Determining refugee status", "Heading3": "13.3.2. Requirements for refugee status for foreign former combatants", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Refugee status determination for former combatants involves establishing three facts: \\n that they have genuinely and permanently given up arms and become civilians; \\n that they meet the definition of a refugee under the 1951 UN Refugee Convention or regional instruments; \\n that they are not excluded from being protected as refugees, according to the exclusion clauses of refugee conventions.", + "Sentence": "Refugee status determination for former combatants involves establishing three facts: \n that they have genuinely and permanently given up arms and become civilians; \n that they meet the definition of a refugee under the 1951 UN Refugee Convention or regional instruments; \n that they are not excluded from being protected as refugees, according to the exclusion clauses of refugee conventions.", "newParagraph": "refugee status determination former combatant involves establishing three fact n genuinely permanently given arm become civilian n meet definition refugee 1951 un refugee convention regional instrument n excluded protected refugee according exclusion clause refugee convention", "ProcessedSent": "refugee status determination former combatant involves establishing three fact n genuinely permanently given arm become civilian n meet definition refugee 1951 un refugee convention regional instrument n excluded protected refugee according exclusion clause refugee convention", "SentID": 9203 @@ -165853,7 +165853,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2671, - "Paragraph": "The issue of exclusion from protection as a refugee will be particularly relevant if there are serious reasons for believing that an individual has committed a crime against peace, a war crime, a crime against humanity, a serious non\u00adpolitical crime outside the country of refuge before he\/she was admitted to that country as a refugee, or acts contrary to the pur\u00ad poses and principles of the UN. As defined by international instruments and interpreted in case law, exclusion clauses would apply if an individual had committed any of the following: \\n crimes against peace, e.g., planning or participating in an unlawful war; \\n war crimes involving grave breaches of international humanitarian law, e.g., mistreatment of civilians and prisoners of war, infliction of unjustified property damage during wartime; \\n crimes against humanity involving fundamentally inhumane conduct on a widespread or system\u00ad atic scale against a civilian population, e.g., genocide, slavery, torture, rape, deportations; \\n serious non\u00adpolitical crimes committed outside the country of refuge prior to admission to that country as a refugee: The purpose of this clause is to ensure that important fugitives from justice are not able to avoid the jurisdiction of a State in which they may lawfully face punishment for genuine, serious crimes, by claiming refugee status in another country; \\n acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the UN: This clause covers, for example, high\u00ad level government officials (Heads of State, ministers, high officials) who have exploited their political authority to endanger the well\u00adbeing of individuals, their country and\/ or the world community.", + "Paragraph": "The issue of exclusion from protection as a refugee will be particularly relevant if there are serious reasons for believing that an individual has committed a crime against peace, a war crime, a crime against humanity, a serious non\u00adpolitical crime outside the country of refuge before he\/she was admitted to that country as a refugee, or acts contrary to the pur\u00ad poses and principles of the UN. As defined by international instruments and interpreted in case law, exclusion clauses would apply if an individual had committed any of the following: \n crimes against peace, e.g., planning or participating in an unlawful war; \n war crimes involving grave breaches of international humanitarian law, e.g., mistreatment of civilians and prisoners of war, infliction of unjustified property damage during wartime; \n crimes against humanity involving fundamentally inhumane conduct on a widespread or system\u00ad atic scale against a civilian population, e.g., genocide, slavery, torture, rape, deportations; \n serious non\u00adpolitical crimes committed outside the country of refuge prior to admission to that country as a refugee: The purpose of this clause is to ensure that important fugitives from justice are not able to avoid the jurisdiction of a State in which they may lawfully face punishment for genuine, serious crimes, by claiming refugee status in another country; \n acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the UN: This clause covers, for example, high\u00ad level government officials (Heads of State, ministers, high officials) who have exploited their political authority to endanger the well\u00adbeing of individuals, their country and\/ or the world community.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -165871,7 +165871,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2671, - "Paragraph": "The issue of exclusion from protection as a refugee will be particularly relevant if there are serious reasons for believing that an individual has committed a crime against peace, a war crime, a crime against humanity, a serious non\u00adpolitical crime outside the country of refuge before he\/she was admitted to that country as a refugee, or acts contrary to the pur\u00ad poses and principles of the UN. As defined by international instruments and interpreted in case law, exclusion clauses would apply if an individual had committed any of the following: \\n crimes against peace, e.g., planning or participating in an unlawful war; \\n war crimes involving grave breaches of international humanitarian law, e.g., mistreatment of civilians and prisoners of war, infliction of unjustified property damage during wartime; \\n crimes against humanity involving fundamentally inhumane conduct on a widespread or system\u00ad atic scale against a civilian population, e.g., genocide, slavery, torture, rape, deportations; \\n serious non\u00adpolitical crimes committed outside the country of refuge prior to admission to that country as a refugee: The purpose of this clause is to ensure that important fugitives from justice are not able to avoid the jurisdiction of a State in which they may lawfully face punishment for genuine, serious crimes, by claiming refugee status in another country; \\n acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the UN: This clause covers, for example, high\u00ad level government officials (Heads of State, ministers, high officials) who have exploited their political authority to endanger the well\u00adbeing of individuals, their country and\/ or the world community.", + "Paragraph": "The issue of exclusion from protection as a refugee will be particularly relevant if there are serious reasons for believing that an individual has committed a crime against peace, a war crime, a crime against humanity, a serious non\u00adpolitical crime outside the country of refuge before he\/she was admitted to that country as a refugee, or acts contrary to the pur\u00ad poses and principles of the UN. As defined by international instruments and interpreted in case law, exclusion clauses would apply if an individual had committed any of the following: \n crimes against peace, e.g., planning or participating in an unlawful war; \n war crimes involving grave breaches of international humanitarian law, e.g., mistreatment of civilians and prisoners of war, infliction of unjustified property damage during wartime; \n crimes against humanity involving fundamentally inhumane conduct on a widespread or system\u00ad atic scale against a civilian population, e.g., genocide, slavery, torture, rape, deportations; \n serious non\u00adpolitical crimes committed outside the country of refuge prior to admission to that country as a refugee: The purpose of this clause is to ensure that important fugitives from justice are not able to avoid the jurisdiction of a State in which they may lawfully face punishment for genuine, serious crimes, by claiming refugee status in another country; \n acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the UN: This clause covers, for example, high\u00ad level government officials (Heads of State, ministers, high officials) who have exploited their political authority to endanger the well\u00adbeing of individuals, their country and\/ or the world community.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -165882,7 +165882,7 @@ "Heading2": "13.3. Determining refugee status", "Heading3": "13.3.4. Exclusion from refugee protection", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "As defined by international instruments and interpreted in case law, exclusion clauses would apply if an individual had committed any of the following: \\n crimes against peace, e.g., planning or participating in an unlawful war; \\n war crimes involving grave breaches of international humanitarian law, e.g., mistreatment of civilians and prisoners of war, infliction of unjustified property damage during wartime; \\n crimes against humanity involving fundamentally inhumane conduct on a widespread or system\u00ad atic scale against a civilian population, e.g., genocide, slavery, torture, rape, deportations; \\n serious non\u00adpolitical crimes committed outside the country of refuge prior to admission to that country as a refugee: The purpose of this clause is to ensure that important fugitives from justice are not able to avoid the jurisdiction of a State in which they may lawfully face punishment for genuine, serious crimes, by claiming refugee status in another country; \\n acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the UN: This clause covers, for example, high\u00ad level government officials (Heads of State, ministers, high officials) who have exploited their political authority to endanger the well\u00adbeing of individuals, their country and\/ or the world community.", + "Sentence": "As defined by international instruments and interpreted in case law, exclusion clauses would apply if an individual had committed any of the following: \n crimes against peace, e.g., planning or participating in an unlawful war; \n war crimes involving grave breaches of international humanitarian law, e.g., mistreatment of civilians and prisoners of war, infliction of unjustified property damage during wartime; \n crimes against humanity involving fundamentally inhumane conduct on a widespread or system\u00ad atic scale against a civilian population, e.g., genocide, slavery, torture, rape, deportations; \n serious non\u00adpolitical crimes committed outside the country of refuge prior to admission to that country as a refugee: The purpose of this clause is to ensure that important fugitives from justice are not able to avoid the jurisdiction of a State in which they may lawfully face punishment for genuine, serious crimes, by claiming refugee status in another country; \n acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the UN: This clause covers, for example, high\u00ad level government officials (Heads of State, ministers, high officials) who have exploited their political authority to endanger the well\u00adbeing of individuals, their country and\/ or the world community.", "newParagraph": "issue exclusion protection refugee particularly relevant serious reason believing individual committed crime peace war crime crime humanity serious non political crime outside country refuge heshe admitted country refugee act contrary pur pose principle un defined international instrument interpreted case law exclusion clause would apply individual committed following n crime peace eg planning participating unlawful war n war crime involving grave breach international humanitarian law eg mistreatment civilian prisoner war infliction unjustified property damage wartime n crime humanity involving fundamentally inhumane conduct widespread system atic scale civilian population eg genocide slavery torture rape deportation n serious non political crime committed outside country refuge prior admission country refugee purpose clause ensure important fugitive justice able avoid jurisdiction state may lawfully face punishment genuine serious crime claiming refugee status another country n act contrary purpose principle un clause cover example high level government official head state minister high official exploited political authority endanger well individual country world community", "ProcessedSent": "defined international instrument interpreted case law exclusion clause would apply individual committed following n crime peace eg planning participating unlawful war n war crime involving grave breach international humanitarian law eg mistreatment civilian prisoner war infliction unjustified property damage wartime n crime humanity involving fundamentally inhumane conduct widespread system atic scale civilian population eg genocide slavery torture rape deportation n serious non political crime committed outside country refuge prior admission country refugee purpose clause ensure important fugitive justice able avoid jurisdiction state may lawfully face punishment genuine serious crime claiming refugee status another country n act contrary purpose principle un clause cover example high level government official head state minister high official exploited political authority endanger well individual country world community", "SentID": 9215 @@ -166339,7 +166339,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2683, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n (NB: For the purposes of this document, the following terms are given the meaning set out below, without prejudice to more precise definitions they may have for other purposes.)", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n (NB: For the purposes of this document, the following terms are given the meaning set out below, without prejudice to more precise definitions they may have for other purposes.)", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -166350,7 +166350,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Terms and definitions \\n (NB: For the purposes of this document, the following terms are given the meaning set out below, without prejudice to more precise definitions they may have for other purposes.)", + "Sentence": "Terms and definitions \n (NB: For the purposes of this document, the following terms are given the meaning set out below, without prejudice to more precise definitions they may have for other purposes.)", "newParagraph": "term definition n nb purpose document following term given meaning set without prejudice precise definition may purpose", "ProcessedSent": "term definition n nb purpose document following term given meaning set without prejudice precise definition may purpose", "SentID": 9241 @@ -166483,7 +166483,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2687, - "Paragraph": "Combatant: Based on an analogy with the definition set out in the Third Geneva Conven\u00ad tion of 1949 relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War in relation to persons engaged in international armed conflicts, a combatant is a person who: \\n is a member of a national army or an irregular military organization; or is actively participating in military activities and hostilities; or \\n is involved in recruiting or training military personnel; or \\n holds a command or decision\u00admaking position within a national army or an armed organization; or \\n arrived in a host country carrying arms or in military uniform or as part of a military structure; or \\n having arrived in a host country as an ordinary civilian, thereafter assumes, or shows determination to assume, any of the above attributes.", + "Paragraph": "Combatant: Based on an analogy with the definition set out in the Third Geneva Conven\u00ad tion of 1949 relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War in relation to persons engaged in international armed conflicts, a combatant is a person who: \n is a member of a national army or an irregular military organization; or is actively participating in military activities and hostilities; or \n is involved in recruiting or training military personnel; or \n holds a command or decision\u00admaking position within a national army or an armed organization; or \n arrived in a host country carrying arms or in military uniform or as part of a military structure; or \n having arrived in a host country as an ordinary civilian, thereafter assumes, or shows determination to assume, any of the above attributes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -166494,7 +166494,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Combatant: Based on an analogy with the definition set out in the Third Geneva Conven\u00ad tion of 1949 relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War in relation to persons engaged in international armed conflicts, a combatant is a person who: \\n is a member of a national army or an irregular military organization; or is actively participating in military activities and hostilities; or \\n is involved in recruiting or training military personnel; or \\n holds a command or decision\u00admaking position within a national army or an armed organization; or \\n arrived in a host country carrying arms or in military uniform or as part of a military structure; or \\n having arrived in a host country as an ordinary civilian, thereafter assumes, or shows determination to assume, any of the above attributes.", + "Sentence": "Combatant: Based on an analogy with the definition set out in the Third Geneva Conven\u00ad tion of 1949 relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War in relation to persons engaged in international armed conflicts, a combatant is a person who: \n is a member of a national army or an irregular military organization; or is actively participating in military activities and hostilities; or \n is involved in recruiting or training military personnel; or \n holds a command or decision\u00admaking position within a national army or an armed organization; or \n arrived in a host country carrying arms or in military uniform or as part of a military structure; or \n having arrived in a host country as an ordinary civilian, thereafter assumes, or shows determination to assume, any of the above attributes.", "newParagraph": "combatant based analogy definition set third geneva conven tion 1949 relative treatment prisoner war relation person engaged international armed conflict combatant person n member national army irregular military organization actively participating military activity hostility n involved recruiting training military personnel n hold command decision making position within national army armed organization n arrived host country carrying arm military uniform part military structure n arrived host country ordinary civilian thereafter assumes show determination assume attribute", "ProcessedSent": "combatant based analogy definition set third geneva conven tion 1949 relative treatment prisoner war relation person engaged international armed conflict combatant person n member national army irregular military organization actively participating military activity hostility n involved recruiting training military personnel n hold command decision making position within national army armed organization n arrived host country carrying arm military uniform part military structure n arrived host country ordinary civilian thereafter assumes show determination assume attribute", "SentID": 9249 @@ -166699,7 +166699,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2695, - "Paragraph": "\\n\\n 1. A mercenary is any person who: \\n a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad in order to fight in an armed conflict; \\n b) Is motivated to take part in the hostilities essentially by the desire for private gain and, in fact, is promised, by or on behalf of a party to the conflict, material compensation substantially in excess of that promised or paid to combatants of similar rank and func\u00ad tions in the armed forces of that party; \\n c) Is neither a national of a party to the conflict nor a resident of territory controlled by a party to the conflict; \\n d) Is not a member of the armed forces of a party to the conflict; and \\n e) Has not been sent by a State which is not a party to the conflict on official duty as a member of its armed forces. \\n\\n 2. A mercenary is also any person who, in any other situation: \\n a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad for the purpose of participating in a concerted act of violence aimed at: \\n (i) Overthrowing a Government or otherwise undermining the constitutional order of a State; or \\n (ii) Undermining the territorial integrity of a State; \\n b) Is motivated to take part therein essentially by the desire for significant private gain and is prompted by the promise of payment of material compensation; \\n c) Is neither a national nor a resident of the State against which such an act is directed; \\n d) Has not been sent by a State on official duty; and \\n e) Is not a member of the armed forces of the State on whose territory the act is undertaken.", + "Paragraph": "\n\n 1. A mercenary is any person who: \n a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad in order to fight in an armed conflict; \n b) Is motivated to take part in the hostilities essentially by the desire for private gain and, in fact, is promised, by or on behalf of a party to the conflict, material compensation substantially in excess of that promised or paid to combatants of similar rank and func\u00ad tions in the armed forces of that party; \n c) Is neither a national of a party to the conflict nor a resident of territory controlled by a party to the conflict; \n d) Is not a member of the armed forces of a party to the conflict; and \n e) Has not been sent by a State which is not a party to the conflict on official duty as a member of its armed forces. \n\n 2. A mercenary is also any person who, in any other situation: \n a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad for the purpose of participating in a concerted act of violence aimed at: \n (i) Overthrowing a Government or otherwise undermining the constitutional order of a State; or \n (ii) Undermining the territorial integrity of a State; \n b) Is motivated to take part therein essentially by the desire for significant private gain and is prompted by the promise of payment of material compensation; \n c) Is neither a national nor a resident of the State against which such an act is directed; \n d) Has not been sent by a State on official duty; and \n e) Is not a member of the armed forces of the State on whose territory the act is undertaken.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -166710,14 +166710,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n 1.", + "Sentence": "\n\n 1.", "newParagraph": "nn 1 mercenary person n specially recruited locally abroad order fight armed conflict n b motivated take part hostility essentially desire private gain fact promised behalf party conflict material compensation substantially excess promised paid combatant similar rank func tions armed force party n c neither national party conflict resident territory controlled party conflict n member armed force party conflict n e sent state party conflict official duty member armed force nn 2 mercenary also person situation n specially recruited locally abroad purpose participating concerted act violence aimed n overthrowing government otherwise undermining constitutional order state n ii undermining territorial integrity state n b motivated take part therein essentially desire significant private gain prompted promise payment material compensation n c neither national resident state act directed n sent state official duty n e member armed force state whose territory act undertaken", "ProcessedSent": "nn 1", "SentID": 9261 }, { "ParagraphID": 2695, - "Paragraph": "\\n\\n 1. A mercenary is any person who: \\n a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad in order to fight in an armed conflict; \\n b) Is motivated to take part in the hostilities essentially by the desire for private gain and, in fact, is promised, by or on behalf of a party to the conflict, material compensation substantially in excess of that promised or paid to combatants of similar rank and func\u00ad tions in the armed forces of that party; \\n c) Is neither a national of a party to the conflict nor a resident of territory controlled by a party to the conflict; \\n d) Is not a member of the armed forces of a party to the conflict; and \\n e) Has not been sent by a State which is not a party to the conflict on official duty as a member of its armed forces. \\n\\n 2. A mercenary is also any person who, in any other situation: \\n a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad for the purpose of participating in a concerted act of violence aimed at: \\n (i) Overthrowing a Government or otherwise undermining the constitutional order of a State; or \\n (ii) Undermining the territorial integrity of a State; \\n b) Is motivated to take part therein essentially by the desire for significant private gain and is prompted by the promise of payment of material compensation; \\n c) Is neither a national nor a resident of the State against which such an act is directed; \\n d) Has not been sent by a State on official duty; and \\n e) Is not a member of the armed forces of the State on whose territory the act is undertaken.", + "Paragraph": "\n\n 1. A mercenary is any person who: \n a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad in order to fight in an armed conflict; \n b) Is motivated to take part in the hostilities essentially by the desire for private gain and, in fact, is promised, by or on behalf of a party to the conflict, material compensation substantially in excess of that promised or paid to combatants of similar rank and func\u00ad tions in the armed forces of that party; \n c) Is neither a national of a party to the conflict nor a resident of territory controlled by a party to the conflict; \n d) Is not a member of the armed forces of a party to the conflict; and \n e) Has not been sent by a State which is not a party to the conflict on official duty as a member of its armed forces. \n\n 2. A mercenary is also any person who, in any other situation: \n a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad for the purpose of participating in a concerted act of violence aimed at: \n (i) Overthrowing a Government or otherwise undermining the constitutional order of a State; or \n (ii) Undermining the territorial integrity of a State; \n b) Is motivated to take part therein essentially by the desire for significant private gain and is prompted by the promise of payment of material compensation; \n c) Is neither a national nor a resident of the State against which such an act is directed; \n d) Has not been sent by a State on official duty; and \n e) Is not a member of the armed forces of the State on whose territory the act is undertaken.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -166728,14 +166728,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "A mercenary is any person who: \\n a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad in order to fight in an armed conflict; \\n b) Is motivated to take part in the hostilities essentially by the desire for private gain and, in fact, is promised, by or on behalf of a party to the conflict, material compensation substantially in excess of that promised or paid to combatants of similar rank and func\u00ad tions in the armed forces of that party; \\n c) Is neither a national of a party to the conflict nor a resident of territory controlled by a party to the conflict; \\n d) Is not a member of the armed forces of a party to the conflict; and \\n e) Has not been sent by a State which is not a party to the conflict on official duty as a member of its armed forces.", + "Sentence": "A mercenary is any person who: \n a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad in order to fight in an armed conflict; \n b) Is motivated to take part in the hostilities essentially by the desire for private gain and, in fact, is promised, by or on behalf of a party to the conflict, material compensation substantially in excess of that promised or paid to combatants of similar rank and func\u00ad tions in the armed forces of that party; \n c) Is neither a national of a party to the conflict nor a resident of territory controlled by a party to the conflict; \n d) Is not a member of the armed forces of a party to the conflict; and \n e) Has not been sent by a State which is not a party to the conflict on official duty as a member of its armed forces.", "newParagraph": "nn 1 mercenary person n specially recruited locally abroad order fight armed conflict n b motivated take part hostility essentially desire private gain fact promised behalf party conflict material compensation substantially excess promised paid combatant similar rank func tions armed force party n c neither national party conflict resident territory controlled party conflict n member armed force party conflict n e sent state party conflict official duty member armed force nn 2 mercenary also person situation n specially recruited locally abroad purpose participating concerted act violence aimed n overthrowing government otherwise undermining constitutional order state n ii undermining territorial integrity state n b motivated take part therein essentially desire significant private gain prompted promise payment material compensation n c neither national resident state act directed n sent state official duty n e member armed force state whose territory act undertaken", "ProcessedSent": "mercenary person n specially recruited locally abroad order fight armed conflict n b motivated take part hostility essentially desire private gain fact promised behalf party conflict material compensation substantially excess promised paid combatant similar rank func tions armed force party n c neither national party conflict resident territory controlled party conflict n member armed force party conflict n e sent state party conflict official duty member armed force", "SentID": 9262 }, { "ParagraphID": 2695, - "Paragraph": "\\n\\n 1. A mercenary is any person who: \\n a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad in order to fight in an armed conflict; \\n b) Is motivated to take part in the hostilities essentially by the desire for private gain and, in fact, is promised, by or on behalf of a party to the conflict, material compensation substantially in excess of that promised or paid to combatants of similar rank and func\u00ad tions in the armed forces of that party; \\n c) Is neither a national of a party to the conflict nor a resident of territory controlled by a party to the conflict; \\n d) Is not a member of the armed forces of a party to the conflict; and \\n e) Has not been sent by a State which is not a party to the conflict on official duty as a member of its armed forces. \\n\\n 2. A mercenary is also any person who, in any other situation: \\n a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad for the purpose of participating in a concerted act of violence aimed at: \\n (i) Overthrowing a Government or otherwise undermining the constitutional order of a State; or \\n (ii) Undermining the territorial integrity of a State; \\n b) Is motivated to take part therein essentially by the desire for significant private gain and is prompted by the promise of payment of material compensation; \\n c) Is neither a national nor a resident of the State against which such an act is directed; \\n d) Has not been sent by a State on official duty; and \\n e) Is not a member of the armed forces of the State on whose territory the act is undertaken.", + "Paragraph": "\n\n 1. A mercenary is any person who: \n a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad in order to fight in an armed conflict; \n b) Is motivated to take part in the hostilities essentially by the desire for private gain and, in fact, is promised, by or on behalf of a party to the conflict, material compensation substantially in excess of that promised or paid to combatants of similar rank and func\u00ad tions in the armed forces of that party; \n c) Is neither a national of a party to the conflict nor a resident of territory controlled by a party to the conflict; \n d) Is not a member of the armed forces of a party to the conflict; and \n e) Has not been sent by a State which is not a party to the conflict on official duty as a member of its armed forces. \n\n 2. A mercenary is also any person who, in any other situation: \n a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad for the purpose of participating in a concerted act of violence aimed at: \n (i) Overthrowing a Government or otherwise undermining the constitutional order of a State; or \n (ii) Undermining the territorial integrity of a State; \n b) Is motivated to take part therein essentially by the desire for significant private gain and is prompted by the promise of payment of material compensation; \n c) Is neither a national nor a resident of the State against which such an act is directed; \n d) Has not been sent by a State on official duty; and \n e) Is not a member of the armed forces of the State on whose territory the act is undertaken.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -166746,14 +166746,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n 2.", + "Sentence": "\n\n 2.", "newParagraph": "nn 1 mercenary person n specially recruited locally abroad order fight armed conflict n b motivated take part hostility essentially desire private gain fact promised behalf party conflict material compensation substantially excess promised paid combatant similar rank func tions armed force party n c neither national party conflict resident territory controlled party conflict n member armed force party conflict n e sent state party conflict official duty member armed force nn 2 mercenary also person situation n specially recruited locally abroad purpose participating concerted act violence aimed n overthrowing government otherwise undermining constitutional order state n ii undermining territorial integrity state n b motivated take part therein essentially desire significant private gain prompted promise payment material compensation n c neither national resident state act directed n sent state official duty n e member armed force state whose territory act undertaken", "ProcessedSent": "nn 2", "SentID": 9263 }, { "ParagraphID": 2695, - "Paragraph": "\\n\\n 1. A mercenary is any person who: \\n a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad in order to fight in an armed conflict; \\n b) Is motivated to take part in the hostilities essentially by the desire for private gain and, in fact, is promised, by or on behalf of a party to the conflict, material compensation substantially in excess of that promised or paid to combatants of similar rank and func\u00ad tions in the armed forces of that party; \\n c) Is neither a national of a party to the conflict nor a resident of territory controlled by a party to the conflict; \\n d) Is not a member of the armed forces of a party to the conflict; and \\n e) Has not been sent by a State which is not a party to the conflict on official duty as a member of its armed forces. \\n\\n 2. A mercenary is also any person who, in any other situation: \\n a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad for the purpose of participating in a concerted act of violence aimed at: \\n (i) Overthrowing a Government or otherwise undermining the constitutional order of a State; or \\n (ii) Undermining the territorial integrity of a State; \\n b) Is motivated to take part therein essentially by the desire for significant private gain and is prompted by the promise of payment of material compensation; \\n c) Is neither a national nor a resident of the State against which such an act is directed; \\n d) Has not been sent by a State on official duty; and \\n e) Is not a member of the armed forces of the State on whose territory the act is undertaken.", + "Paragraph": "\n\n 1. A mercenary is any person who: \n a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad in order to fight in an armed conflict; \n b) Is motivated to take part in the hostilities essentially by the desire for private gain and, in fact, is promised, by or on behalf of a party to the conflict, material compensation substantially in excess of that promised or paid to combatants of similar rank and func\u00ad tions in the armed forces of that party; \n c) Is neither a national of a party to the conflict nor a resident of territory controlled by a party to the conflict; \n d) Is not a member of the armed forces of a party to the conflict; and \n e) Has not been sent by a State which is not a party to the conflict on official duty as a member of its armed forces. \n\n 2. A mercenary is also any person who, in any other situation: \n a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad for the purpose of participating in a concerted act of violence aimed at: \n (i) Overthrowing a Government or otherwise undermining the constitutional order of a State; or \n (ii) Undermining the territorial integrity of a State; \n b) Is motivated to take part therein essentially by the desire for significant private gain and is prompted by the promise of payment of material compensation; \n c) Is neither a national nor a resident of the State against which such an act is directed; \n d) Has not been sent by a State on official duty; and \n e) Is not a member of the armed forces of the State on whose territory the act is undertaken.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -166764,7 +166764,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "A mercenary is also any person who, in any other situation: \\n a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad for the purpose of participating in a concerted act of violence aimed at: \\n (i) Overthrowing a Government or otherwise undermining the constitutional order of a State; or \\n (ii) Undermining the territorial integrity of a State; \\n b) Is motivated to take part therein essentially by the desire for significant private gain and is prompted by the promise of payment of material compensation; \\n c) Is neither a national nor a resident of the State against which such an act is directed; \\n d) Has not been sent by a State on official duty; and \\n e) Is not a member of the armed forces of the State on whose territory the act is undertaken.", + "Sentence": "A mercenary is also any person who, in any other situation: \n a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad for the purpose of participating in a concerted act of violence aimed at: \n (i) Overthrowing a Government or otherwise undermining the constitutional order of a State; or \n (ii) Undermining the territorial integrity of a State; \n b) Is motivated to take part therein essentially by the desire for significant private gain and is prompted by the promise of payment of material compensation; \n c) Is neither a national nor a resident of the State against which such an act is directed; \n d) Has not been sent by a State on official duty; and \n e) Is not a member of the armed forces of the State on whose territory the act is undertaken.", "newParagraph": "nn 1 mercenary person n specially recruited locally abroad order fight armed conflict n b motivated take part hostility essentially desire private gain fact promised behalf party conflict material compensation substantially excess promised paid combatant similar rank func tions armed force party n c neither national party conflict resident territory controlled party conflict n member armed force party conflict n e sent state party conflict official duty member armed force nn 2 mercenary also person situation n specially recruited locally abroad purpose participating concerted act violence aimed n overthrowing government otherwise undermining constitutional order state n ii undermining territorial integrity state n b motivated take part therein essentially desire significant private gain prompted promise payment material compensation n c neither national resident state act directed n sent state official duty n e member armed force state whose territory act undertaken", "ProcessedSent": "mercenary also person situation n specially recruited locally abroad purpose participating concerted act violence aimed n overthrowing government otherwise undermining constitutional order state n ii undermining territorial integrity state n b motivated take part therein essentially desire significant private gain prompted promise payment material compensation n c neither national resident state act directed n sent state official duty n e member armed force state whose territory act undertaken", "SentID": 9264 @@ -166825,7 +166825,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2698, - "Paragraph": "Refugee: A refugee is defined in the 1951 UN Convention relating to the Status of Refugees as a person who: \\n \u201cIs outside the country of origin; \\n Has a well\u00adfounded fear of persecution because of race, religion, nationality, member\u00ad ship of a particular social group or political opinion; and \\n Is unable or unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country, or to return there, for fear of persecution.\u201d \\n\\n In Africa and Latin America, this definition has been extended. The 1969 OAU Conven\u00ad tion Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa also includes as refugees persons fleeing civil disturbances, widespread violence and war. In Latin America, the Carta\u00ad gena Declaration of 1984, although not binding, recommends that the definition should also include persons who fled their country \u201cbecause their lives, safety or freedom have been threatened by generalized violence, foreign aggression, internal conflicts, massive violations of human rights or other circumstances which have seriously disturbed public order\u201d.", + "Paragraph": "Refugee: A refugee is defined in the 1951 UN Convention relating to the Status of Refugees as a person who: \n \u201cIs outside the country of origin; \n Has a well\u00adfounded fear of persecution because of race, religion, nationality, member\u00ad ship of a particular social group or political opinion; and \n Is unable or unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country, or to return there, for fear of persecution.\u201d \n\n In Africa and Latin America, this definition has been extended. The 1969 OAU Conven\u00ad tion Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa also includes as refugees persons fleeing civil disturbances, widespread violence and war. In Latin America, the Carta\u00ad gena Declaration of 1984, although not binding, recommends that the definition should also include persons who fled their country \u201cbecause their lives, safety or freedom have been threatened by generalized violence, foreign aggression, internal conflicts, massive violations of human rights or other circumstances which have seriously disturbed public order\u201d.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -166836,14 +166836,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Refugee: A refugee is defined in the 1951 UN Convention relating to the Status of Refugees as a person who: \\n \u201cIs outside the country of origin; \\n Has a well\u00adfounded fear of persecution because of race, religion, nationality, member\u00ad ship of a particular social group or political opinion; and \\n Is unable or unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country, or to return there, for fear of persecution.\u201d \\n\\n In Africa and Latin America, this definition has been extended.", + "Sentence": "Refugee: A refugee is defined in the 1951 UN Convention relating to the Status of Refugees as a person who: \n \u201cIs outside the country of origin; \n Has a well\u00adfounded fear of persecution because of race, religion, nationality, member\u00ad ship of a particular social group or political opinion; and \n Is unable or unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country, or to return there, for fear of persecution.\u201d \n\n In Africa and Latin America, this definition has been extended.", "newParagraph": "refugee refugee defined 1951 un convention relating status refugee person n outside country origin n well founded fear persecution race religion nationality member ship particular social group political opinion n unable unwilling avail protection country return fear persecution nn africa latin america definition extended 1969 oau conven tion governing specific aspect refugee problem africa also includes refugee person fleeing civil disturbance widespread violence war latin america carta gena declaration 1984 although binding recommends definition also include person fled country life safety freedom threatened generalized violence foreign aggression internal conflict massive violation human right circumstance seriously disturbed public order ", "ProcessedSent": "refugee refugee defined 1951 un convention relating status refugee person n outside country origin n well founded fear persecution race religion nationality member ship particular social group political opinion n unable unwilling avail protection country return fear persecution nn africa latin america definition extended", "SentID": 9268 }, { "ParagraphID": 2698, - "Paragraph": "Refugee: A refugee is defined in the 1951 UN Convention relating to the Status of Refugees as a person who: \\n \u201cIs outside the country of origin; \\n Has a well\u00adfounded fear of persecution because of race, religion, nationality, member\u00ad ship of a particular social group or political opinion; and \\n Is unable or unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country, or to return there, for fear of persecution.\u201d \\n\\n In Africa and Latin America, this definition has been extended. The 1969 OAU Conven\u00ad tion Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa also includes as refugees persons fleeing civil disturbances, widespread violence and war. In Latin America, the Carta\u00ad gena Declaration of 1984, although not binding, recommends that the definition should also include persons who fled their country \u201cbecause their lives, safety or freedom have been threatened by generalized violence, foreign aggression, internal conflicts, massive violations of human rights or other circumstances which have seriously disturbed public order\u201d.", + "Paragraph": "Refugee: A refugee is defined in the 1951 UN Convention relating to the Status of Refugees as a person who: \n \u201cIs outside the country of origin; \n Has a well\u00adfounded fear of persecution because of race, religion, nationality, member\u00ad ship of a particular social group or political opinion; and \n Is unable or unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country, or to return there, for fear of persecution.\u201d \n\n In Africa and Latin America, this definition has been extended. The 1969 OAU Conven\u00ad tion Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa also includes as refugees persons fleeing civil disturbances, widespread violence and war. In Latin America, the Carta\u00ad gena Declaration of 1984, although not binding, recommends that the definition should also include persons who fled their country \u201cbecause their lives, safety or freedom have been threatened by generalized violence, foreign aggression, internal conflicts, massive violations of human rights or other circumstances which have seriously disturbed public order\u201d.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -166861,7 +166861,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2698, - "Paragraph": "Refugee: A refugee is defined in the 1951 UN Convention relating to the Status of Refugees as a person who: \\n \u201cIs outside the country of origin; \\n Has a well\u00adfounded fear of persecution because of race, religion, nationality, member\u00ad ship of a particular social group or political opinion; and \\n Is unable or unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country, or to return there, for fear of persecution.\u201d \\n\\n In Africa and Latin America, this definition has been extended. The 1969 OAU Conven\u00ad tion Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa also includes as refugees persons fleeing civil disturbances, widespread violence and war. In Latin America, the Carta\u00ad gena Declaration of 1984, although not binding, recommends that the definition should also include persons who fled their country \u201cbecause their lives, safety or freedom have been threatened by generalized violence, foreign aggression, internal conflicts, massive violations of human rights or other circumstances which have seriously disturbed public order\u201d.", + "Paragraph": "Refugee: A refugee is defined in the 1951 UN Convention relating to the Status of Refugees as a person who: \n \u201cIs outside the country of origin; \n Has a well\u00adfounded fear of persecution because of race, religion, nationality, member\u00ad ship of a particular social group or political opinion; and \n Is unable or unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country, or to return there, for fear of persecution.\u201d \n\n In Africa and Latin America, this definition has been extended. The 1969 OAU Conven\u00ad tion Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa also includes as refugees persons fleeing civil disturbances, widespread violence and war. In Latin America, the Carta\u00ad gena Declaration of 1984, although not binding, recommends that the definition should also include persons who fled their country \u201cbecause their lives, safety or freedom have been threatened by generalized violence, foreign aggression, internal conflicts, massive violations of human rights or other circumstances which have seriously disturbed public order\u201d.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -166933,7 +166933,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2701, - "Paragraph": "The Executive Committee, \\n\\n Remaining seriously concerned by the continuing occurrence of military or armed attacks and other threats to the security of refugees, including the infiltration and presence of armed elements in refugee camps and settlements;17 \\n\\n Recalling the relevant provisions of international refugee law, international human rights law and international humanitarian law; \\n\\n Recalling its Conclusion No. 27 (XXXIII) and Conclusion No. 32 (XXXIV) on military attacks on refugee camps and settlements in Southern Africa and elsewhere; Conclusion 72 (XLIV) on personal security of refugees; Conclusion No. 48 (XXXVIII) on military or armed attacks on refugee camps and settlements; Conclusion No. 47 (XXXVIII) and Conclusion No. 84 (XLVII), on refugee children and adolescents, as well as Conclusion 64 (XLI) on refugee women and international protection; \\n\\n Recalling also United Nations Security Council resolution S\/RES\/1208 (1998) and S\/RES\/1296 (2000), and the two reports of the United Nations Secretary\u00adGeneral on the Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict18, noting in particular the recommendations made therein with respect to enhancing the security of refugee camps and settlements; \\n\\n Welcoming the discussion which took place on the civilian character of asylum in the context of the Global Consultations on International Protection;19 \\n\\n Noting that several international meetings have recently been held, aimed at identifying effective operational strategies for maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum;20 \\n\\n Reiterating that refugee camps and settlements should have an exclusively civilian and humanitarian character, that the grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act which should not be regarded as unfriendly by another State, as stated in the 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa and a number of EXCOM Conclusions, and that all actors, including refugees themselves, have the obligation to coop\u00ad erate in ensuring the peaceful and humanitarian character of refugee camps and settlements; \\n\\n Recognizing that the presence of armed elements in refugee camps or settlements; recruit\u00ad ment and training by government armed forces or organized armed groups; the use of such camps, intended to accommodate refugee populations on purely humanitarian grounds, for the internment of prisoners of war; as well as other forms of exploitation of refugee situations for the purpose of promoting military objectives are likely to expose refugees, par\u00ad ticularly women and children, to serious physical danger, inhibit the realization of durable solutions, in particular voluntary repatriation, but also local integration, jeopardize the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum and may threaten the national security of States, as well as inter\u00adState relations; \\n\\n Recognizing the special protection needs of refugee children and adolescents who, especially when living in camps where refugees are mixed with armed elements, are particularly vul\u00ad nerable to recruitment by government armed forces or organized armed groups; \\n\\n Reaffirming the importance of States, UNHCR and other relevant actors, integrating safety and security concerns from the outset of a refugee emergency into refugee camp manage\u00ad ment in a holistic manner; \\n (a) Acknowledges that host States have the primary responsibility to ensure the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum by, inter alia, making all efforts to locate refugee camps and settlements at a reasonable distance from the border, maintaining law and order, curtailing the flow of arms into refugee camps and settlements, preventing their use for the internment of prisoners of war, as well as through the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation and internment of combatants; \\n (b) Urges refugee\u00adhosting States to respect the civilian and humanitarian character of refu\u00ad gee camps by preventing their use for purposes which are incompatible with their civilian character; \\n (c) Recommends that action taken by States to ensure respect for the civilian and humani\u00ad tarian character of asylum be guided, inter alia, by the following principles; \\n (i) Respect for the right to seek asylum, and for the fundamental principle of non\u00ad refoulement, should be maintained at all times; \\n (ii) Measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, sep\u00ad aration and internment of combatants should be taken as early as possible, preferably at the point of entry or at the first reception\/transit centres for new arrivals; \\n (iii) To facilitate early identification and separation of combatants, registration of new arrivals should be conducted by means of a careful screening process; \\n (iv) Refugee camps and settlements should benefit from adequate security arrange\u00ad ments to deter infiltration by armed elements and the strengthening of law and order; \\n (v) Once identified, disarmed and separated from the refugee population, combat\u00ad ants should be interned at a safe location from the border; \\n (vi) Where the granting of refugee status is based on group determination, civilian family members of combatants should be treated as refugees and should not be interned together with them; \\n (vii) Combatants should not be considered as asylum\u00adseekers until the authorities have established within a reasonable timeframe that they have genuinely and permanently renounced military activities. Once this has been established, special procedures should be put in place for individual refugee status deter\u00ad mination, to ensure that those seeking asylum fulfil the criteria for the recogni\u00ad tion of refugee status. During the refugee status determination process, utmost attention should be paid to article 1F of the 1951 Convention, in order to avoid abuse of the asylum system by those who do not deserve international protection; \\n (viii) Former child soldiers should benefit from special protection and assistance measures, in particular as regards their demobilization and rehabilitation; \\n (ix) Where necessary, host States should develop, with assistance from UNHCR, operational guidelines in the context of group determination to exclude those individuals who are not deserving of international refugee protection; \\n (d) Further to para 3 (b) above, calls upon UNHCR to convene a meeting of experts in sup\u00ad port of the elaboration of measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation, and internment of combatants, including the clarification of relevant procedures and standards, in consultation with States, United Nations Secre\u00ad tariat entities and agencies, and interested organizations, such as the ICRC, and report back to the Executive Committee on progress achieved; \\n (e) Calls upon States to ensure that measures are taken to prevent the recruitment of refugees by government armed forces or organized armed groups, in particular of children, taking into account also that unaccompanied and separated children are even more vulner\u00ad able to recruitment than other children; \\n (f) Calls upon the relevant United Nations organs and regional organizations, in pursuance of their respective mandates, as well as the international community at large, to mobi\u00ad lize adequate resources to support and assist host States in maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum, in line with the principles of international solidarity, co\u00adoperation, burden and responsibility sharing; \\n (g) Calls upon UNHCR and the Department of Peacekeeping Operations of the United Nations Secretariat to enhance collaboration on all aspects of this complex matter, and as appropriate, to deploy, with the consent of host States, multi\u00addisciplinary assess\u00ad ment teams to an emerging crisis area in order to clarify the situation on the ground, evaluate security threats for refugee populations and consider appropriate practical responses; \\n (h) Calls upon UNHCR to explore how it may develop, in consultation with relevant part\u00ad ners, its own institutional capacity to address insecurity in refugee camps, inter alia by assisting States to ensure the physical safety and dignity of refugees, building, as appro\u00ad priate, upon its protection and operational expertise.", + "Paragraph": "The Executive Committee, \n\n Remaining seriously concerned by the continuing occurrence of military or armed attacks and other threats to the security of refugees, including the infiltration and presence of armed elements in refugee camps and settlements;17 \n\n Recalling the relevant provisions of international refugee law, international human rights law and international humanitarian law; \n\n Recalling its Conclusion No. 27 (XXXIII) and Conclusion No. 32 (XXXIV) on military attacks on refugee camps and settlements in Southern Africa and elsewhere; Conclusion 72 (XLIV) on personal security of refugees; Conclusion No. 48 (XXXVIII) on military or armed attacks on refugee camps and settlements; Conclusion No. 47 (XXXVIII) and Conclusion No. 84 (XLVII), on refugee children and adolescents, as well as Conclusion 64 (XLI) on refugee women and international protection; \n\n Recalling also United Nations Security Council resolution S\/RES\/1208 (1998) and S\/RES\/1296 (2000), and the two reports of the United Nations Secretary\u00adGeneral on the Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict18, noting in particular the recommendations made therein with respect to enhancing the security of refugee camps and settlements; \n\n Welcoming the discussion which took place on the civilian character of asylum in the context of the Global Consultations on International Protection;19 \n\n Noting that several international meetings have recently been held, aimed at identifying effective operational strategies for maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum;20 \n\n Reiterating that refugee camps and settlements should have an exclusively civilian and humanitarian character, that the grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act which should not be regarded as unfriendly by another State, as stated in the 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa and a number of EXCOM Conclusions, and that all actors, including refugees themselves, have the obligation to coop\u00ad erate in ensuring the peaceful and humanitarian character of refugee camps and settlements; \n\n Recognizing that the presence of armed elements in refugee camps or settlements; recruit\u00ad ment and training by government armed forces or organized armed groups; the use of such camps, intended to accommodate refugee populations on purely humanitarian grounds, for the internment of prisoners of war; as well as other forms of exploitation of refugee situations for the purpose of promoting military objectives are likely to expose refugees, par\u00ad ticularly women and children, to serious physical danger, inhibit the realization of durable solutions, in particular voluntary repatriation, but also local integration, jeopardize the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum and may threaten the national security of States, as well as inter\u00adState relations; \n\n Recognizing the special protection needs of refugee children and adolescents who, especially when living in camps where refugees are mixed with armed elements, are particularly vul\u00ad nerable to recruitment by government armed forces or organized armed groups; \n\n Reaffirming the importance of States, UNHCR and other relevant actors, integrating safety and security concerns from the outset of a refugee emergency into refugee camp manage\u00ad ment in a holistic manner; \n (a) Acknowledges that host States have the primary responsibility to ensure the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum by, inter alia, making all efforts to locate refugee camps and settlements at a reasonable distance from the border, maintaining law and order, curtailing the flow of arms into refugee camps and settlements, preventing their use for the internment of prisoners of war, as well as through the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation and internment of combatants; \n (b) Urges refugee\u00adhosting States to respect the civilian and humanitarian character of refu\u00ad gee camps by preventing their use for purposes which are incompatible with their civilian character; \n (c) Recommends that action taken by States to ensure respect for the civilian and humani\u00ad tarian character of asylum be guided, inter alia, by the following principles; \n (i) Respect for the right to seek asylum, and for the fundamental principle of non\u00ad refoulement, should be maintained at all times; \n (ii) Measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, sep\u00ad aration and internment of combatants should be taken as early as possible, preferably at the point of entry or at the first reception\/transit centres for new arrivals; \n (iii) To facilitate early identification and separation of combatants, registration of new arrivals should be conducted by means of a careful screening process; \n (iv) Refugee camps and settlements should benefit from adequate security arrange\u00ad ments to deter infiltration by armed elements and the strengthening of law and order; \n (v) Once identified, disarmed and separated from the refugee population, combat\u00ad ants should be interned at a safe location from the border; \n (vi) Where the granting of refugee status is based on group determination, civilian family members of combatants should be treated as refugees and should not be interned together with them; \n (vii) Combatants should not be considered as asylum\u00adseekers until the authorities have established within a reasonable timeframe that they have genuinely and permanently renounced military activities. Once this has been established, special procedures should be put in place for individual refugee status deter\u00ad mination, to ensure that those seeking asylum fulfil the criteria for the recogni\u00ad tion of refugee status. During the refugee status determination process, utmost attention should be paid to article 1F of the 1951 Convention, in order to avoid abuse of the asylum system by those who do not deserve international protection; \n (viii) Former child soldiers should benefit from special protection and assistance measures, in particular as regards their demobilization and rehabilitation; \n (ix) Where necessary, host States should develop, with assistance from UNHCR, operational guidelines in the context of group determination to exclude those individuals who are not deserving of international refugee protection; \n (d) Further to para 3 (b) above, calls upon UNHCR to convene a meeting of experts in sup\u00ad port of the elaboration of measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation, and internment of combatants, including the clarification of relevant procedures and standards, in consultation with States, United Nations Secre\u00ad tariat entities and agencies, and interested organizations, such as the ICRC, and report back to the Executive Committee on progress achieved; \n (e) Calls upon States to ensure that measures are taken to prevent the recruitment of refugees by government armed forces or organized armed groups, in particular of children, taking into account also that unaccompanied and separated children are even more vulner\u00ad able to recruitment than other children; \n (f) Calls upon the relevant United Nations organs and regional organizations, in pursuance of their respective mandates, as well as the international community at large, to mobi\u00ad lize adequate resources to support and assist host States in maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum, in line with the principles of international solidarity, co\u00adoperation, burden and responsibility sharing; \n (g) Calls upon UNHCR and the Department of Peacekeeping Operations of the United Nations Secretariat to enhance collaboration on all aspects of this complex matter, and as appropriate, to deploy, with the consent of host States, multi\u00addisciplinary assess\u00ad ment teams to an emerging crisis area in order to clarify the situation on the ground, evaluate security threats for refugee populations and consider appropriate practical responses; \n (h) Calls upon UNHCR to explore how it may develop, in consultation with relevant part\u00ad ners, its own institutional capacity to address insecurity in refugee camps, inter alia by assisting States to ensure the physical safety and dignity of refugees, building, as appro\u00ad priate, upon its protection and operational expertise.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -166944,14 +166944,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The Executive Committee, \\n\\n Remaining seriously concerned by the continuing occurrence of military or armed attacks and other threats to the security of refugees, including the infiltration and presence of armed elements in refugee camps and settlements;17 \\n\\n Recalling the relevant provisions of international refugee law, international human rights law and international humanitarian law; \\n\\n Recalling its Conclusion No.", + "Sentence": "The Executive Committee, \n\n Remaining seriously concerned by the continuing occurrence of military or armed attacks and other threats to the security of refugees, including the infiltration and presence of armed elements in refugee camps and settlements;17 \n\n Recalling the relevant provisions of international refugee law, international human rights law and international humanitarian law; \n\n Recalling its Conclusion No.", "newParagraph": "executive committee nn remaining seriously concerned continuing occurrence military armed attack threat security refugee including infiltration presence armed element refugee camp settlements17 nn recalling relevant provision international refugee law international human right law international humanitarian law nn recalling conclusion 27 xxxiii conclusion 32 xxxiv military attack refugee camp settlement southern africa elsewhere conclusion 72 xliv personal security refugee conclusion 48 xxxviii military armed attack refugee camp settlement conclusion 47 xxxviii conclusion 84 xlvii refugee child adolescent well conclusion 64 xli refugee woman international protection nn recalling also united nation security council resolution sres1208 1998 sres1296 2000 two report united nation secretary general protection civilian armed conflict18 noting particular recommendation made therein respect enhancing security refugee camp settlement nn welcoming discussion took place civilian character asylum context global consultation international protection19 nn noting several international meeting recently held aimed identifying effective operational strategy maintaining civilian humanitarian character asylum20 nn reiterating refugee camp settlement exclusively civilian humanitarian character grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act regarded unfriendly another state stated 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa number excom conclusion actor including refugee obligation coop erate ensuring peaceful humanitarian character refugee camp settlement nn recognizing presence armed element refugee camp settlement recruit ment training government armed force organized armed group use camp intended accommodate refugee population purely humanitarian ground internment prisoner war well form exploitation refugee situation purpose promoting military objective likely expose refugee par ticularly woman child serious physical danger inhibit realization durable solution particular voluntary repatriation also local integration jeopardize civilian humanitarian character asylum may threaten national security state well inter state relation nn recognizing special protection need refugee child adolescent especially living camp refugee mixed armed element particularly vul nerable recruitment government armed force organized armed group nn reaffirming importance state unhcr relevant actor integrating safety security concern outset refugee emergency refugee camp manage ment holistic manner n acknowledges host state primary responsibility ensure civilian humanitarian character asylum inter alia making effort locate refugee camp settlement reasonable distance border maintaining law order curtailing flow arm refugee camp settlement preventing use internment prisoner war well disarmament armed element identification separation internment combatant n b urge refugee hosting state respect civilian humanitarian character refu gee camp preventing use purpose incompatible civilian character n c recommends action taken state ensure respect civilian humani tarian character asylum guided inter alia following principle n respect right seek asylum fundamental principle non refoulement maintained time n ii measure disarmament armed element identification sep aration internment combatant taken early possible preferably point entry first receptiontransit centre new arrival n iii facilitate early identification separation combatant registration new arrival conducted mean careful screening process n iv refugee camp settlement benefit adequate security arrange ments deter infiltration armed element strengthening law order n v identified disarmed separated refugee population combat ant interned safe location border n vi granting refugee status based group determination civilian family member combatant treated refugee interned together n vii combatant considered asylum seeker authority established within reasonable timeframe genuinely permanently renounced military activity established special procedure put place individual refugee status deter mination ensure seeking asylum fulfil criterion recogni tion refugee status refugee status determination process utmost attention paid article 1f 1951 convention order avoid abuse asylum system deserve international protection n viii former child soldier benefit special protection assistance measure particular regard demobilization rehabilitation n ix necessary host state develop assistance unhcr operational guideline context group determination exclude individual deserving international refugee protection n para 3 b call upon unhcr convene meeting expert sup port elaboration measure disarmament armed element identification separation internment combatant including clarification relevant procedure standard consultation state united nation secre tariat entity agency interested organization icrc report back executive committee progress achieved n e call upon state ensure measure taken prevent recruitment refugee government armed force organized armed group particular child taking account also unaccompanied separated child even vulner able recruitment child n f call upon relevant united nation organ regional organization pursuance respective mandate well international community large mobi lize adequate resource support assist host state maintaining civilian humanitarian character asylum line principle international solidarity co operation burden responsibility sharing n g call upon unhcr department peacekeeping operation united nation secretariat enhance collaboration aspect complex matter appropriate deploy consent host state multi disciplinary ass ment team emerging crisis area order clarify situation ground evaluate security threat refugee population consider appropriate practical response n h call upon unhcr explore may develop consultation relevant part ners institutional capacity address insecurity refugee camp inter alia assisting state ensure physical safety dignity refugee building appro priate upon protection operational expertise", "ProcessedSent": "executive committee nn remaining seriously concerned continuing occurrence military armed attack threat security refugee including infiltration presence armed element refugee camp settlements17 nn recalling relevant provision international refugee law international human right law international humanitarian law nn recalling conclusion", "SentID": 9274 }, { "ParagraphID": 2701, - "Paragraph": "The Executive Committee, \\n\\n Remaining seriously concerned by the continuing occurrence of military or armed attacks and other threats to the security of refugees, including the infiltration and presence of armed elements in refugee camps and settlements;17 \\n\\n Recalling the relevant provisions of international refugee law, international human rights law and international humanitarian law; \\n\\n Recalling its Conclusion No. 27 (XXXIII) and Conclusion No. 32 (XXXIV) on military attacks on refugee camps and settlements in Southern Africa and elsewhere; Conclusion 72 (XLIV) on personal security of refugees; Conclusion No. 48 (XXXVIII) on military or armed attacks on refugee camps and settlements; Conclusion No. 47 (XXXVIII) and Conclusion No. 84 (XLVII), on refugee children and adolescents, as well as Conclusion 64 (XLI) on refugee women and international protection; \\n\\n Recalling also United Nations Security Council resolution S\/RES\/1208 (1998) and S\/RES\/1296 (2000), and the two reports of the United Nations Secretary\u00adGeneral on the Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict18, noting in particular the recommendations made therein with respect to enhancing the security of refugee camps and settlements; \\n\\n Welcoming the discussion which took place on the civilian character of asylum in the context of the Global Consultations on International Protection;19 \\n\\n Noting that several international meetings have recently been held, aimed at identifying effective operational strategies for maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum;20 \\n\\n Reiterating that refugee camps and settlements should have an exclusively civilian and humanitarian character, that the grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act which should not be regarded as unfriendly by another State, as stated in the 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa and a number of EXCOM Conclusions, and that all actors, including refugees themselves, have the obligation to coop\u00ad erate in ensuring the peaceful and humanitarian character of refugee camps and settlements; \\n\\n Recognizing that the presence of armed elements in refugee camps or settlements; recruit\u00ad ment and training by government armed forces or organized armed groups; the use of such camps, intended to accommodate refugee populations on purely humanitarian grounds, for the internment of prisoners of war; as well as other forms of exploitation of refugee situations for the purpose of promoting military objectives are likely to expose refugees, par\u00ad ticularly women and children, to serious physical danger, inhibit the realization of durable solutions, in particular voluntary repatriation, but also local integration, jeopardize the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum and may threaten the national security of States, as well as inter\u00adState relations; \\n\\n Recognizing the special protection needs of refugee children and adolescents who, especially when living in camps where refugees are mixed with armed elements, are particularly vul\u00ad nerable to recruitment by government armed forces or organized armed groups; \\n\\n Reaffirming the importance of States, UNHCR and other relevant actors, integrating safety and security concerns from the outset of a refugee emergency into refugee camp manage\u00ad ment in a holistic manner; \\n (a) Acknowledges that host States have the primary responsibility to ensure the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum by, inter alia, making all efforts to locate refugee camps and settlements at a reasonable distance from the border, maintaining law and order, curtailing the flow of arms into refugee camps and settlements, preventing their use for the internment of prisoners of war, as well as through the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation and internment of combatants; \\n (b) Urges refugee\u00adhosting States to respect the civilian and humanitarian character of refu\u00ad gee camps by preventing their use for purposes which are incompatible with their civilian character; \\n (c) Recommends that action taken by States to ensure respect for the civilian and humani\u00ad tarian character of asylum be guided, inter alia, by the following principles; \\n (i) Respect for the right to seek asylum, and for the fundamental principle of non\u00ad refoulement, should be maintained at all times; \\n (ii) Measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, sep\u00ad aration and internment of combatants should be taken as early as possible, preferably at the point of entry or at the first reception\/transit centres for new arrivals; \\n (iii) To facilitate early identification and separation of combatants, registration of new arrivals should be conducted by means of a careful screening process; \\n (iv) Refugee camps and settlements should benefit from adequate security arrange\u00ad ments to deter infiltration by armed elements and the strengthening of law and order; \\n (v) Once identified, disarmed and separated from the refugee population, combat\u00ad ants should be interned at a safe location from the border; \\n (vi) Where the granting of refugee status is based on group determination, civilian family members of combatants should be treated as refugees and should not be interned together with them; \\n (vii) Combatants should not be considered as asylum\u00adseekers until the authorities have established within a reasonable timeframe that they have genuinely and permanently renounced military activities. Once this has been established, special procedures should be put in place for individual refugee status deter\u00ad mination, to ensure that those seeking asylum fulfil the criteria for the recogni\u00ad tion of refugee status. During the refugee status determination process, utmost attention should be paid to article 1F of the 1951 Convention, in order to avoid abuse of the asylum system by those who do not deserve international protection; \\n (viii) Former child soldiers should benefit from special protection and assistance measures, in particular as regards their demobilization and rehabilitation; \\n (ix) Where necessary, host States should develop, with assistance from UNHCR, operational guidelines in the context of group determination to exclude those individuals who are not deserving of international refugee protection; \\n (d) Further to para 3 (b) above, calls upon UNHCR to convene a meeting of experts in sup\u00ad port of the elaboration of measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation, and internment of combatants, including the clarification of relevant procedures and standards, in consultation with States, United Nations Secre\u00ad tariat entities and agencies, and interested organizations, such as the ICRC, and report back to the Executive Committee on progress achieved; \\n (e) Calls upon States to ensure that measures are taken to prevent the recruitment of refugees by government armed forces or organized armed groups, in particular of children, taking into account also that unaccompanied and separated children are even more vulner\u00ad able to recruitment than other children; \\n (f) Calls upon the relevant United Nations organs and regional organizations, in pursuance of their respective mandates, as well as the international community at large, to mobi\u00ad lize adequate resources to support and assist host States in maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum, in line with the principles of international solidarity, co\u00adoperation, burden and responsibility sharing; \\n (g) Calls upon UNHCR and the Department of Peacekeeping Operations of the United Nations Secretariat to enhance collaboration on all aspects of this complex matter, and as appropriate, to deploy, with the consent of host States, multi\u00addisciplinary assess\u00ad ment teams to an emerging crisis area in order to clarify the situation on the ground, evaluate security threats for refugee populations and consider appropriate practical responses; \\n (h) Calls upon UNHCR to explore how it may develop, in consultation with relevant part\u00ad ners, its own institutional capacity to address insecurity in refugee camps, inter alia by assisting States to ensure the physical safety and dignity of refugees, building, as appro\u00ad priate, upon its protection and operational expertise.", + "Paragraph": "The Executive Committee, \n\n Remaining seriously concerned by the continuing occurrence of military or armed attacks and other threats to the security of refugees, including the infiltration and presence of armed elements in refugee camps and settlements;17 \n\n Recalling the relevant provisions of international refugee law, international human rights law and international humanitarian law; \n\n Recalling its Conclusion No. 27 (XXXIII) and Conclusion No. 32 (XXXIV) on military attacks on refugee camps and settlements in Southern Africa and elsewhere; Conclusion 72 (XLIV) on personal security of refugees; Conclusion No. 48 (XXXVIII) on military or armed attacks on refugee camps and settlements; Conclusion No. 47 (XXXVIII) and Conclusion No. 84 (XLVII), on refugee children and adolescents, as well as Conclusion 64 (XLI) on refugee women and international protection; \n\n Recalling also United Nations Security Council resolution S\/RES\/1208 (1998) and S\/RES\/1296 (2000), and the two reports of the United Nations Secretary\u00adGeneral on the Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict18, noting in particular the recommendations made therein with respect to enhancing the security of refugee camps and settlements; \n\n Welcoming the discussion which took place on the civilian character of asylum in the context of the Global Consultations on International Protection;19 \n\n Noting that several international meetings have recently been held, aimed at identifying effective operational strategies for maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum;20 \n\n Reiterating that refugee camps and settlements should have an exclusively civilian and humanitarian character, that the grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act which should not be regarded as unfriendly by another State, as stated in the 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa and a number of EXCOM Conclusions, and that all actors, including refugees themselves, have the obligation to coop\u00ad erate in ensuring the peaceful and humanitarian character of refugee camps and settlements; \n\n Recognizing that the presence of armed elements in refugee camps or settlements; recruit\u00ad ment and training by government armed forces or organized armed groups; the use of such camps, intended to accommodate refugee populations on purely humanitarian grounds, for the internment of prisoners of war; as well as other forms of exploitation of refugee situations for the purpose of promoting military objectives are likely to expose refugees, par\u00ad ticularly women and children, to serious physical danger, inhibit the realization of durable solutions, in particular voluntary repatriation, but also local integration, jeopardize the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum and may threaten the national security of States, as well as inter\u00adState relations; \n\n Recognizing the special protection needs of refugee children and adolescents who, especially when living in camps where refugees are mixed with armed elements, are particularly vul\u00ad nerable to recruitment by government armed forces or organized armed groups; \n\n Reaffirming the importance of States, UNHCR and other relevant actors, integrating safety and security concerns from the outset of a refugee emergency into refugee camp manage\u00ad ment in a holistic manner; \n (a) Acknowledges that host States have the primary responsibility to ensure the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum by, inter alia, making all efforts to locate refugee camps and settlements at a reasonable distance from the border, maintaining law and order, curtailing the flow of arms into refugee camps and settlements, preventing their use for the internment of prisoners of war, as well as through the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation and internment of combatants; \n (b) Urges refugee\u00adhosting States to respect the civilian and humanitarian character of refu\u00ad gee camps by preventing their use for purposes which are incompatible with their civilian character; \n (c) Recommends that action taken by States to ensure respect for the civilian and humani\u00ad tarian character of asylum be guided, inter alia, by the following principles; \n (i) Respect for the right to seek asylum, and for the fundamental principle of non\u00ad refoulement, should be maintained at all times; \n (ii) Measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, sep\u00ad aration and internment of combatants should be taken as early as possible, preferably at the point of entry or at the first reception\/transit centres for new arrivals; \n (iii) To facilitate early identification and separation of combatants, registration of new arrivals should be conducted by means of a careful screening process; \n (iv) Refugee camps and settlements should benefit from adequate security arrange\u00ad ments to deter infiltration by armed elements and the strengthening of law and order; \n (v) Once identified, disarmed and separated from the refugee population, combat\u00ad ants should be interned at a safe location from the border; \n (vi) Where the granting of refugee status is based on group determination, civilian family members of combatants should be treated as refugees and should not be interned together with them; \n (vii) Combatants should not be considered as asylum\u00adseekers until the authorities have established within a reasonable timeframe that they have genuinely and permanently renounced military activities. Once this has been established, special procedures should be put in place for individual refugee status deter\u00ad mination, to ensure that those seeking asylum fulfil the criteria for the recogni\u00ad tion of refugee status. During the refugee status determination process, utmost attention should be paid to article 1F of the 1951 Convention, in order to avoid abuse of the asylum system by those who do not deserve international protection; \n (viii) Former child soldiers should benefit from special protection and assistance measures, in particular as regards their demobilization and rehabilitation; \n (ix) Where necessary, host States should develop, with assistance from UNHCR, operational guidelines in the context of group determination to exclude those individuals who are not deserving of international refugee protection; \n (d) Further to para 3 (b) above, calls upon UNHCR to convene a meeting of experts in sup\u00ad port of the elaboration of measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation, and internment of combatants, including the clarification of relevant procedures and standards, in consultation with States, United Nations Secre\u00ad tariat entities and agencies, and interested organizations, such as the ICRC, and report back to the Executive Committee on progress achieved; \n (e) Calls upon States to ensure that measures are taken to prevent the recruitment of refugees by government armed forces or organized armed groups, in particular of children, taking into account also that unaccompanied and separated children are even more vulner\u00ad able to recruitment than other children; \n (f) Calls upon the relevant United Nations organs and regional organizations, in pursuance of their respective mandates, as well as the international community at large, to mobi\u00ad lize adequate resources to support and assist host States in maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum, in line with the principles of international solidarity, co\u00adoperation, burden and responsibility sharing; \n (g) Calls upon UNHCR and the Department of Peacekeeping Operations of the United Nations Secretariat to enhance collaboration on all aspects of this complex matter, and as appropriate, to deploy, with the consent of host States, multi\u00addisciplinary assess\u00ad ment teams to an emerging crisis area in order to clarify the situation on the ground, evaluate security threats for refugee populations and consider appropriate practical responses; \n (h) Calls upon UNHCR to explore how it may develop, in consultation with relevant part\u00ad ners, its own institutional capacity to address insecurity in refugee camps, inter alia by assisting States to ensure the physical safety and dignity of refugees, building, as appro\u00ad priate, upon its protection and operational expertise.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -166969,7 +166969,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2701, - "Paragraph": "The Executive Committee, \\n\\n Remaining seriously concerned by the continuing occurrence of military or armed attacks and other threats to the security of refugees, including the infiltration and presence of armed elements in refugee camps and settlements;17 \\n\\n Recalling the relevant provisions of international refugee law, international human rights law and international humanitarian law; \\n\\n Recalling its Conclusion No. 27 (XXXIII) and Conclusion No. 32 (XXXIV) on military attacks on refugee camps and settlements in Southern Africa and elsewhere; Conclusion 72 (XLIV) on personal security of refugees; Conclusion No. 48 (XXXVIII) on military or armed attacks on refugee camps and settlements; Conclusion No. 47 (XXXVIII) and Conclusion No. 84 (XLVII), on refugee children and adolescents, as well as Conclusion 64 (XLI) on refugee women and international protection; \\n\\n Recalling also United Nations Security Council resolution S\/RES\/1208 (1998) and S\/RES\/1296 (2000), and the two reports of the United Nations Secretary\u00adGeneral on the Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict18, noting in particular the recommendations made therein with respect to enhancing the security of refugee camps and settlements; \\n\\n Welcoming the discussion which took place on the civilian character of asylum in the context of the Global Consultations on International Protection;19 \\n\\n Noting that several international meetings have recently been held, aimed at identifying effective operational strategies for maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum;20 \\n\\n Reiterating that refugee camps and settlements should have an exclusively civilian and humanitarian character, that the grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act which should not be regarded as unfriendly by another State, as stated in the 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa and a number of EXCOM Conclusions, and that all actors, including refugees themselves, have the obligation to coop\u00ad erate in ensuring the peaceful and humanitarian character of refugee camps and settlements; \\n\\n Recognizing that the presence of armed elements in refugee camps or settlements; recruit\u00ad ment and training by government armed forces or organized armed groups; the use of such camps, intended to accommodate refugee populations on purely humanitarian grounds, for the internment of prisoners of war; as well as other forms of exploitation of refugee situations for the purpose of promoting military objectives are likely to expose refugees, par\u00ad ticularly women and children, to serious physical danger, inhibit the realization of durable solutions, in particular voluntary repatriation, but also local integration, jeopardize the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum and may threaten the national security of States, as well as inter\u00adState relations; \\n\\n Recognizing the special protection needs of refugee children and adolescents who, especially when living in camps where refugees are mixed with armed elements, are particularly vul\u00ad nerable to recruitment by government armed forces or organized armed groups; \\n\\n Reaffirming the importance of States, UNHCR and other relevant actors, integrating safety and security concerns from the outset of a refugee emergency into refugee camp manage\u00ad ment in a holistic manner; \\n (a) Acknowledges that host States have the primary responsibility to ensure the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum by, inter alia, making all efforts to locate refugee camps and settlements at a reasonable distance from the border, maintaining law and order, curtailing the flow of arms into refugee camps and settlements, preventing their use for the internment of prisoners of war, as well as through the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation and internment of combatants; \\n (b) Urges refugee\u00adhosting States to respect the civilian and humanitarian character of refu\u00ad gee camps by preventing their use for purposes which are incompatible with their civilian character; \\n (c) Recommends that action taken by States to ensure respect for the civilian and humani\u00ad tarian character of asylum be guided, inter alia, by the following principles; \\n (i) Respect for the right to seek asylum, and for the fundamental principle of non\u00ad refoulement, should be maintained at all times; \\n (ii) Measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, sep\u00ad aration and internment of combatants should be taken as early as possible, preferably at the point of entry or at the first reception\/transit centres for new arrivals; \\n (iii) To facilitate early identification and separation of combatants, registration of new arrivals should be conducted by means of a careful screening process; \\n (iv) Refugee camps and settlements should benefit from adequate security arrange\u00ad ments to deter infiltration by armed elements and the strengthening of law and order; \\n (v) Once identified, disarmed and separated from the refugee population, combat\u00ad ants should be interned at a safe location from the border; \\n (vi) Where the granting of refugee status is based on group determination, civilian family members of combatants should be treated as refugees and should not be interned together with them; \\n (vii) Combatants should not be considered as asylum\u00adseekers until the authorities have established within a reasonable timeframe that they have genuinely and permanently renounced military activities. Once this has been established, special procedures should be put in place for individual refugee status deter\u00ad mination, to ensure that those seeking asylum fulfil the criteria for the recogni\u00ad tion of refugee status. During the refugee status determination process, utmost attention should be paid to article 1F of the 1951 Convention, in order to avoid abuse of the asylum system by those who do not deserve international protection; \\n (viii) Former child soldiers should benefit from special protection and assistance measures, in particular as regards their demobilization and rehabilitation; \\n (ix) Where necessary, host States should develop, with assistance from UNHCR, operational guidelines in the context of group determination to exclude those individuals who are not deserving of international refugee protection; \\n (d) Further to para 3 (b) above, calls upon UNHCR to convene a meeting of experts in sup\u00ad port of the elaboration of measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation, and internment of combatants, including the clarification of relevant procedures and standards, in consultation with States, United Nations Secre\u00ad tariat entities and agencies, and interested organizations, such as the ICRC, and report back to the Executive Committee on progress achieved; \\n (e) Calls upon States to ensure that measures are taken to prevent the recruitment of refugees by government armed forces or organized armed groups, in particular of children, taking into account also that unaccompanied and separated children are even more vulner\u00ad able to recruitment than other children; \\n (f) Calls upon the relevant United Nations organs and regional organizations, in pursuance of their respective mandates, as well as the international community at large, to mobi\u00ad lize adequate resources to support and assist host States in maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum, in line with the principles of international solidarity, co\u00adoperation, burden and responsibility sharing; \\n (g) Calls upon UNHCR and the Department of Peacekeeping Operations of the United Nations Secretariat to enhance collaboration on all aspects of this complex matter, and as appropriate, to deploy, with the consent of host States, multi\u00addisciplinary assess\u00ad ment teams to an emerging crisis area in order to clarify the situation on the ground, evaluate security threats for refugee populations and consider appropriate practical responses; \\n (h) Calls upon UNHCR to explore how it may develop, in consultation with relevant part\u00ad ners, its own institutional capacity to address insecurity in refugee camps, inter alia by assisting States to ensure the physical safety and dignity of refugees, building, as appro\u00ad priate, upon its protection and operational expertise.", + "Paragraph": "The Executive Committee, \n\n Remaining seriously concerned by the continuing occurrence of military or armed attacks and other threats to the security of refugees, including the infiltration and presence of armed elements in refugee camps and settlements;17 \n\n Recalling the relevant provisions of international refugee law, international human rights law and international humanitarian law; \n\n Recalling its Conclusion No. 27 (XXXIII) and Conclusion No. 32 (XXXIV) on military attacks on refugee camps and settlements in Southern Africa and elsewhere; Conclusion 72 (XLIV) on personal security of refugees; Conclusion No. 48 (XXXVIII) on military or armed attacks on refugee camps and settlements; Conclusion No. 47 (XXXVIII) and Conclusion No. 84 (XLVII), on refugee children and adolescents, as well as Conclusion 64 (XLI) on refugee women and international protection; \n\n Recalling also United Nations Security Council resolution S\/RES\/1208 (1998) and S\/RES\/1296 (2000), and the two reports of the United Nations Secretary\u00adGeneral on the Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict18, noting in particular the recommendations made therein with respect to enhancing the security of refugee camps and settlements; \n\n Welcoming the discussion which took place on the civilian character of asylum in the context of the Global Consultations on International Protection;19 \n\n Noting that several international meetings have recently been held, aimed at identifying effective operational strategies for maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum;20 \n\n Reiterating that refugee camps and settlements should have an exclusively civilian and humanitarian character, that the grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act which should not be regarded as unfriendly by another State, as stated in the 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa and a number of EXCOM Conclusions, and that all actors, including refugees themselves, have the obligation to coop\u00ad erate in ensuring the peaceful and humanitarian character of refugee camps and settlements; \n\n Recognizing that the presence of armed elements in refugee camps or settlements; recruit\u00ad ment and training by government armed forces or organized armed groups; the use of such camps, intended to accommodate refugee populations on purely humanitarian grounds, for the internment of prisoners of war; as well as other forms of exploitation of refugee situations for the purpose of promoting military objectives are likely to expose refugees, par\u00ad ticularly women and children, to serious physical danger, inhibit the realization of durable solutions, in particular voluntary repatriation, but also local integration, jeopardize the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum and may threaten the national security of States, as well as inter\u00adState relations; \n\n Recognizing the special protection needs of refugee children and adolescents who, especially when living in camps where refugees are mixed with armed elements, are particularly vul\u00ad nerable to recruitment by government armed forces or organized armed groups; \n\n Reaffirming the importance of States, UNHCR and other relevant actors, integrating safety and security concerns from the outset of a refugee emergency into refugee camp manage\u00ad ment in a holistic manner; \n (a) Acknowledges that host States have the primary responsibility to ensure the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum by, inter alia, making all efforts to locate refugee camps and settlements at a reasonable distance from the border, maintaining law and order, curtailing the flow of arms into refugee camps and settlements, preventing their use for the internment of prisoners of war, as well as through the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation and internment of combatants; \n (b) Urges refugee\u00adhosting States to respect the civilian and humanitarian character of refu\u00ad gee camps by preventing their use for purposes which are incompatible with their civilian character; \n (c) Recommends that action taken by States to ensure respect for the civilian and humani\u00ad tarian character of asylum be guided, inter alia, by the following principles; \n (i) Respect for the right to seek asylum, and for the fundamental principle of non\u00ad refoulement, should be maintained at all times; \n (ii) Measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, sep\u00ad aration and internment of combatants should be taken as early as possible, preferably at the point of entry or at the first reception\/transit centres for new arrivals; \n (iii) To facilitate early identification and separation of combatants, registration of new arrivals should be conducted by means of a careful screening process; \n (iv) Refugee camps and settlements should benefit from adequate security arrange\u00ad ments to deter infiltration by armed elements and the strengthening of law and order; \n (v) Once identified, disarmed and separated from the refugee population, combat\u00ad ants should be interned at a safe location from the border; \n (vi) Where the granting of refugee status is based on group determination, civilian family members of combatants should be treated as refugees and should not be interned together with them; \n (vii) Combatants should not be considered as asylum\u00adseekers until the authorities have established within a reasonable timeframe that they have genuinely and permanently renounced military activities. Once this has been established, special procedures should be put in place for individual refugee status deter\u00ad mination, to ensure that those seeking asylum fulfil the criteria for the recogni\u00ad tion of refugee status. During the refugee status determination process, utmost attention should be paid to article 1F of the 1951 Convention, in order to avoid abuse of the asylum system by those who do not deserve international protection; \n (viii) Former child soldiers should benefit from special protection and assistance measures, in particular as regards their demobilization and rehabilitation; \n (ix) Where necessary, host States should develop, with assistance from UNHCR, operational guidelines in the context of group determination to exclude those individuals who are not deserving of international refugee protection; \n (d) Further to para 3 (b) above, calls upon UNHCR to convene a meeting of experts in sup\u00ad port of the elaboration of measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation, and internment of combatants, including the clarification of relevant procedures and standards, in consultation with States, United Nations Secre\u00ad tariat entities and agencies, and interested organizations, such as the ICRC, and report back to the Executive Committee on progress achieved; \n (e) Calls upon States to ensure that measures are taken to prevent the recruitment of refugees by government armed forces or organized armed groups, in particular of children, taking into account also that unaccompanied and separated children are even more vulner\u00ad able to recruitment than other children; \n (f) Calls upon the relevant United Nations organs and regional organizations, in pursuance of their respective mandates, as well as the international community at large, to mobi\u00ad lize adequate resources to support and assist host States in maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum, in line with the principles of international solidarity, co\u00adoperation, burden and responsibility sharing; \n (g) Calls upon UNHCR and the Department of Peacekeeping Operations of the United Nations Secretariat to enhance collaboration on all aspects of this complex matter, and as appropriate, to deploy, with the consent of host States, multi\u00addisciplinary assess\u00ad ment teams to an emerging crisis area in order to clarify the situation on the ground, evaluate security threats for refugee populations and consider appropriate practical responses; \n (h) Calls upon UNHCR to explore how it may develop, in consultation with relevant part\u00ad ners, its own institutional capacity to address insecurity in refugee camps, inter alia by assisting States to ensure the physical safety and dignity of refugees, building, as appro\u00ad priate, upon its protection and operational expertise.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -166987,7 +166987,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2701, - "Paragraph": "The Executive Committee, \\n\\n Remaining seriously concerned by the continuing occurrence of military or armed attacks and other threats to the security of refugees, including the infiltration and presence of armed elements in refugee camps and settlements;17 \\n\\n Recalling the relevant provisions of international refugee law, international human rights law and international humanitarian law; \\n\\n Recalling its Conclusion No. 27 (XXXIII) and Conclusion No. 32 (XXXIV) on military attacks on refugee camps and settlements in Southern Africa and elsewhere; Conclusion 72 (XLIV) on personal security of refugees; Conclusion No. 48 (XXXVIII) on military or armed attacks on refugee camps and settlements; Conclusion No. 47 (XXXVIII) and Conclusion No. 84 (XLVII), on refugee children and adolescents, as well as Conclusion 64 (XLI) on refugee women and international protection; \\n\\n Recalling also United Nations Security Council resolution S\/RES\/1208 (1998) and S\/RES\/1296 (2000), and the two reports of the United Nations Secretary\u00adGeneral on the Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict18, noting in particular the recommendations made therein with respect to enhancing the security of refugee camps and settlements; \\n\\n Welcoming the discussion which took place on the civilian character of asylum in the context of the Global Consultations on International Protection;19 \\n\\n Noting that several international meetings have recently been held, aimed at identifying effective operational strategies for maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum;20 \\n\\n Reiterating that refugee camps and settlements should have an exclusively civilian and humanitarian character, that the grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act which should not be regarded as unfriendly by another State, as stated in the 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa and a number of EXCOM Conclusions, and that all actors, including refugees themselves, have the obligation to coop\u00ad erate in ensuring the peaceful and humanitarian character of refugee camps and settlements; \\n\\n Recognizing that the presence of armed elements in refugee camps or settlements; recruit\u00ad ment and training by government armed forces or organized armed groups; the use of such camps, intended to accommodate refugee populations on purely humanitarian grounds, for the internment of prisoners of war; as well as other forms of exploitation of refugee situations for the purpose of promoting military objectives are likely to expose refugees, par\u00ad ticularly women and children, to serious physical danger, inhibit the realization of durable solutions, in particular voluntary repatriation, but also local integration, jeopardize the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum and may threaten the national security of States, as well as inter\u00adState relations; \\n\\n Recognizing the special protection needs of refugee children and adolescents who, especially when living in camps where refugees are mixed with armed elements, are particularly vul\u00ad nerable to recruitment by government armed forces or organized armed groups; \\n\\n Reaffirming the importance of States, UNHCR and other relevant actors, integrating safety and security concerns from the outset of a refugee emergency into refugee camp manage\u00ad ment in a holistic manner; \\n (a) Acknowledges that host States have the primary responsibility to ensure the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum by, inter alia, making all efforts to locate refugee camps and settlements at a reasonable distance from the border, maintaining law and order, curtailing the flow of arms into refugee camps and settlements, preventing their use for the internment of prisoners of war, as well as through the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation and internment of combatants; \\n (b) Urges refugee\u00adhosting States to respect the civilian and humanitarian character of refu\u00ad gee camps by preventing their use for purposes which are incompatible with their civilian character; \\n (c) Recommends that action taken by States to ensure respect for the civilian and humani\u00ad tarian character of asylum be guided, inter alia, by the following principles; \\n (i) Respect for the right to seek asylum, and for the fundamental principle of non\u00ad refoulement, should be maintained at all times; \\n (ii) Measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, sep\u00ad aration and internment of combatants should be taken as early as possible, preferably at the point of entry or at the first reception\/transit centres for new arrivals; \\n (iii) To facilitate early identification and separation of combatants, registration of new arrivals should be conducted by means of a careful screening process; \\n (iv) Refugee camps and settlements should benefit from adequate security arrange\u00ad ments to deter infiltration by armed elements and the strengthening of law and order; \\n (v) Once identified, disarmed and separated from the refugee population, combat\u00ad ants should be interned at a safe location from the border; \\n (vi) Where the granting of refugee status is based on group determination, civilian family members of combatants should be treated as refugees and should not be interned together with them; \\n (vii) Combatants should not be considered as asylum\u00adseekers until the authorities have established within a reasonable timeframe that they have genuinely and permanently renounced military activities. Once this has been established, special procedures should be put in place for individual refugee status deter\u00ad mination, to ensure that those seeking asylum fulfil the criteria for the recogni\u00ad tion of refugee status. During the refugee status determination process, utmost attention should be paid to article 1F of the 1951 Convention, in order to avoid abuse of the asylum system by those who do not deserve international protection; \\n (viii) Former child soldiers should benefit from special protection and assistance measures, in particular as regards their demobilization and rehabilitation; \\n (ix) Where necessary, host States should develop, with assistance from UNHCR, operational guidelines in the context of group determination to exclude those individuals who are not deserving of international refugee protection; \\n (d) Further to para 3 (b) above, calls upon UNHCR to convene a meeting of experts in sup\u00ad port of the elaboration of measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation, and internment of combatants, including the clarification of relevant procedures and standards, in consultation with States, United Nations Secre\u00ad tariat entities and agencies, and interested organizations, such as the ICRC, and report back to the Executive Committee on progress achieved; \\n (e) Calls upon States to ensure that measures are taken to prevent the recruitment of refugees by government armed forces or organized armed groups, in particular of children, taking into account also that unaccompanied and separated children are even more vulner\u00ad able to recruitment than other children; \\n (f) Calls upon the relevant United Nations organs and regional organizations, in pursuance of their respective mandates, as well as the international community at large, to mobi\u00ad lize adequate resources to support and assist host States in maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum, in line with the principles of international solidarity, co\u00adoperation, burden and responsibility sharing; \\n (g) Calls upon UNHCR and the Department of Peacekeeping Operations of the United Nations Secretariat to enhance collaboration on all aspects of this complex matter, and as appropriate, to deploy, with the consent of host States, multi\u00addisciplinary assess\u00ad ment teams to an emerging crisis area in order to clarify the situation on the ground, evaluate security threats for refugee populations and consider appropriate practical responses; \\n (h) Calls upon UNHCR to explore how it may develop, in consultation with relevant part\u00ad ners, its own institutional capacity to address insecurity in refugee camps, inter alia by assisting States to ensure the physical safety and dignity of refugees, building, as appro\u00ad priate, upon its protection and operational expertise.", + "Paragraph": "The Executive Committee, \n\n Remaining seriously concerned by the continuing occurrence of military or armed attacks and other threats to the security of refugees, including the infiltration and presence of armed elements in refugee camps and settlements;17 \n\n Recalling the relevant provisions of international refugee law, international human rights law and international humanitarian law; \n\n Recalling its Conclusion No. 27 (XXXIII) and Conclusion No. 32 (XXXIV) on military attacks on refugee camps and settlements in Southern Africa and elsewhere; Conclusion 72 (XLIV) on personal security of refugees; Conclusion No. 48 (XXXVIII) on military or armed attacks on refugee camps and settlements; Conclusion No. 47 (XXXVIII) and Conclusion No. 84 (XLVII), on refugee children and adolescents, as well as Conclusion 64 (XLI) on refugee women and international protection; \n\n Recalling also United Nations Security Council resolution S\/RES\/1208 (1998) and S\/RES\/1296 (2000), and the two reports of the United Nations Secretary\u00adGeneral on the Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict18, noting in particular the recommendations made therein with respect to enhancing the security of refugee camps and settlements; \n\n Welcoming the discussion which took place on the civilian character of asylum in the context of the Global Consultations on International Protection;19 \n\n Noting that several international meetings have recently been held, aimed at identifying effective operational strategies for maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum;20 \n\n Reiterating that refugee camps and settlements should have an exclusively civilian and humanitarian character, that the grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act which should not be regarded as unfriendly by another State, as stated in the 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa and a number of EXCOM Conclusions, and that all actors, including refugees themselves, have the obligation to coop\u00ad erate in ensuring the peaceful and humanitarian character of refugee camps and settlements; \n\n Recognizing that the presence of armed elements in refugee camps or settlements; recruit\u00ad ment and training by government armed forces or organized armed groups; the use of such camps, intended to accommodate refugee populations on purely humanitarian grounds, for the internment of prisoners of war; as well as other forms of exploitation of refugee situations for the purpose of promoting military objectives are likely to expose refugees, par\u00ad ticularly women and children, to serious physical danger, inhibit the realization of durable solutions, in particular voluntary repatriation, but also local integration, jeopardize the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum and may threaten the national security of States, as well as inter\u00adState relations; \n\n Recognizing the special protection needs of refugee children and adolescents who, especially when living in camps where refugees are mixed with armed elements, are particularly vul\u00ad nerable to recruitment by government armed forces or organized armed groups; \n\n Reaffirming the importance of States, UNHCR and other relevant actors, integrating safety and security concerns from the outset of a refugee emergency into refugee camp manage\u00ad ment in a holistic manner; \n (a) Acknowledges that host States have the primary responsibility to ensure the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum by, inter alia, making all efforts to locate refugee camps and settlements at a reasonable distance from the border, maintaining law and order, curtailing the flow of arms into refugee camps and settlements, preventing their use for the internment of prisoners of war, as well as through the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation and internment of combatants; \n (b) Urges refugee\u00adhosting States to respect the civilian and humanitarian character of refu\u00ad gee camps by preventing their use for purposes which are incompatible with their civilian character; \n (c) Recommends that action taken by States to ensure respect for the civilian and humani\u00ad tarian character of asylum be guided, inter alia, by the following principles; \n (i) Respect for the right to seek asylum, and for the fundamental principle of non\u00ad refoulement, should be maintained at all times; \n (ii) Measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, sep\u00ad aration and internment of combatants should be taken as early as possible, preferably at the point of entry or at the first reception\/transit centres for new arrivals; \n (iii) To facilitate early identification and separation of combatants, registration of new arrivals should be conducted by means of a careful screening process; \n (iv) Refugee camps and settlements should benefit from adequate security arrange\u00ad ments to deter infiltration by armed elements and the strengthening of law and order; \n (v) Once identified, disarmed and separated from the refugee population, combat\u00ad ants should be interned at a safe location from the border; \n (vi) Where the granting of refugee status is based on group determination, civilian family members of combatants should be treated as refugees and should not be interned together with them; \n (vii) Combatants should not be considered as asylum\u00adseekers until the authorities have established within a reasonable timeframe that they have genuinely and permanently renounced military activities. Once this has been established, special procedures should be put in place for individual refugee status deter\u00ad mination, to ensure that those seeking asylum fulfil the criteria for the recogni\u00ad tion of refugee status. During the refugee status determination process, utmost attention should be paid to article 1F of the 1951 Convention, in order to avoid abuse of the asylum system by those who do not deserve international protection; \n (viii) Former child soldiers should benefit from special protection and assistance measures, in particular as regards their demobilization and rehabilitation; \n (ix) Where necessary, host States should develop, with assistance from UNHCR, operational guidelines in the context of group determination to exclude those individuals who are not deserving of international refugee protection; \n (d) Further to para 3 (b) above, calls upon UNHCR to convene a meeting of experts in sup\u00ad port of the elaboration of measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation, and internment of combatants, including the clarification of relevant procedures and standards, in consultation with States, United Nations Secre\u00ad tariat entities and agencies, and interested organizations, such as the ICRC, and report back to the Executive Committee on progress achieved; \n (e) Calls upon States to ensure that measures are taken to prevent the recruitment of refugees by government armed forces or organized armed groups, in particular of children, taking into account also that unaccompanied and separated children are even more vulner\u00ad able to recruitment than other children; \n (f) Calls upon the relevant United Nations organs and regional organizations, in pursuance of their respective mandates, as well as the international community at large, to mobi\u00ad lize adequate resources to support and assist host States in maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum, in line with the principles of international solidarity, co\u00adoperation, burden and responsibility sharing; \n (g) Calls upon UNHCR and the Department of Peacekeeping Operations of the United Nations Secretariat to enhance collaboration on all aspects of this complex matter, and as appropriate, to deploy, with the consent of host States, multi\u00addisciplinary assess\u00ad ment teams to an emerging crisis area in order to clarify the situation on the ground, evaluate security threats for refugee populations and consider appropriate practical responses; \n (h) Calls upon UNHCR to explore how it may develop, in consultation with relevant part\u00ad ners, its own institutional capacity to address insecurity in refugee camps, inter alia by assisting States to ensure the physical safety and dignity of refugees, building, as appro\u00ad priate, upon its protection and operational expertise.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167005,7 +167005,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2701, - "Paragraph": "The Executive Committee, \\n\\n Remaining seriously concerned by the continuing occurrence of military or armed attacks and other threats to the security of refugees, including the infiltration and presence of armed elements in refugee camps and settlements;17 \\n\\n Recalling the relevant provisions of international refugee law, international human rights law and international humanitarian law; \\n\\n Recalling its Conclusion No. 27 (XXXIII) and Conclusion No. 32 (XXXIV) on military attacks on refugee camps and settlements in Southern Africa and elsewhere; Conclusion 72 (XLIV) on personal security of refugees; Conclusion No. 48 (XXXVIII) on military or armed attacks on refugee camps and settlements; Conclusion No. 47 (XXXVIII) and Conclusion No. 84 (XLVII), on refugee children and adolescents, as well as Conclusion 64 (XLI) on refugee women and international protection; \\n\\n Recalling also United Nations Security Council resolution S\/RES\/1208 (1998) and S\/RES\/1296 (2000), and the two reports of the United Nations Secretary\u00adGeneral on the Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict18, noting in particular the recommendations made therein with respect to enhancing the security of refugee camps and settlements; \\n\\n Welcoming the discussion which took place on the civilian character of asylum in the context of the Global Consultations on International Protection;19 \\n\\n Noting that several international meetings have recently been held, aimed at identifying effective operational strategies for maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum;20 \\n\\n Reiterating that refugee camps and settlements should have an exclusively civilian and humanitarian character, that the grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act which should not be regarded as unfriendly by another State, as stated in the 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa and a number of EXCOM Conclusions, and that all actors, including refugees themselves, have the obligation to coop\u00ad erate in ensuring the peaceful and humanitarian character of refugee camps and settlements; \\n\\n Recognizing that the presence of armed elements in refugee camps or settlements; recruit\u00ad ment and training by government armed forces or organized armed groups; the use of such camps, intended to accommodate refugee populations on purely humanitarian grounds, for the internment of prisoners of war; as well as other forms of exploitation of refugee situations for the purpose of promoting military objectives are likely to expose refugees, par\u00ad ticularly women and children, to serious physical danger, inhibit the realization of durable solutions, in particular voluntary repatriation, but also local integration, jeopardize the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum and may threaten the national security of States, as well as inter\u00adState relations; \\n\\n Recognizing the special protection needs of refugee children and adolescents who, especially when living in camps where refugees are mixed with armed elements, are particularly vul\u00ad nerable to recruitment by government armed forces or organized armed groups; \\n\\n Reaffirming the importance of States, UNHCR and other relevant actors, integrating safety and security concerns from the outset of a refugee emergency into refugee camp manage\u00ad ment in a holistic manner; \\n (a) Acknowledges that host States have the primary responsibility to ensure the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum by, inter alia, making all efforts to locate refugee camps and settlements at a reasonable distance from the border, maintaining law and order, curtailing the flow of arms into refugee camps and settlements, preventing their use for the internment of prisoners of war, as well as through the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation and internment of combatants; \\n (b) Urges refugee\u00adhosting States to respect the civilian and humanitarian character of refu\u00ad gee camps by preventing their use for purposes which are incompatible with their civilian character; \\n (c) Recommends that action taken by States to ensure respect for the civilian and humani\u00ad tarian character of asylum be guided, inter alia, by the following principles; \\n (i) Respect for the right to seek asylum, and for the fundamental principle of non\u00ad refoulement, should be maintained at all times; \\n (ii) Measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, sep\u00ad aration and internment of combatants should be taken as early as possible, preferably at the point of entry or at the first reception\/transit centres for new arrivals; \\n (iii) To facilitate early identification and separation of combatants, registration of new arrivals should be conducted by means of a careful screening process; \\n (iv) Refugee camps and settlements should benefit from adequate security arrange\u00ad ments to deter infiltration by armed elements and the strengthening of law and order; \\n (v) Once identified, disarmed and separated from the refugee population, combat\u00ad ants should be interned at a safe location from the border; \\n (vi) Where the granting of refugee status is based on group determination, civilian family members of combatants should be treated as refugees and should not be interned together with them; \\n (vii) Combatants should not be considered as asylum\u00adseekers until the authorities have established within a reasonable timeframe that they have genuinely and permanently renounced military activities. Once this has been established, special procedures should be put in place for individual refugee status deter\u00ad mination, to ensure that those seeking asylum fulfil the criteria for the recogni\u00ad tion of refugee status. During the refugee status determination process, utmost attention should be paid to article 1F of the 1951 Convention, in order to avoid abuse of the asylum system by those who do not deserve international protection; \\n (viii) Former child soldiers should benefit from special protection and assistance measures, in particular as regards their demobilization and rehabilitation; \\n (ix) Where necessary, host States should develop, with assistance from UNHCR, operational guidelines in the context of group determination to exclude those individuals who are not deserving of international refugee protection; \\n (d) Further to para 3 (b) above, calls upon UNHCR to convene a meeting of experts in sup\u00ad port of the elaboration of measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation, and internment of combatants, including the clarification of relevant procedures and standards, in consultation with States, United Nations Secre\u00ad tariat entities and agencies, and interested organizations, such as the ICRC, and report back to the Executive Committee on progress achieved; \\n (e) Calls upon States to ensure that measures are taken to prevent the recruitment of refugees by government armed forces or organized armed groups, in particular of children, taking into account also that unaccompanied and separated children are even more vulner\u00ad able to recruitment than other children; \\n (f) Calls upon the relevant United Nations organs and regional organizations, in pursuance of their respective mandates, as well as the international community at large, to mobi\u00ad lize adequate resources to support and assist host States in maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum, in line with the principles of international solidarity, co\u00adoperation, burden and responsibility sharing; \\n (g) Calls upon UNHCR and the Department of Peacekeeping Operations of the United Nations Secretariat to enhance collaboration on all aspects of this complex matter, and as appropriate, to deploy, with the consent of host States, multi\u00addisciplinary assess\u00ad ment teams to an emerging crisis area in order to clarify the situation on the ground, evaluate security threats for refugee populations and consider appropriate practical responses; \\n (h) Calls upon UNHCR to explore how it may develop, in consultation with relevant part\u00ad ners, its own institutional capacity to address insecurity in refugee camps, inter alia by assisting States to ensure the physical safety and dignity of refugees, building, as appro\u00ad priate, upon its protection and operational expertise.", + "Paragraph": "The Executive Committee, \n\n Remaining seriously concerned by the continuing occurrence of military or armed attacks and other threats to the security of refugees, including the infiltration and presence of armed elements in refugee camps and settlements;17 \n\n Recalling the relevant provisions of international refugee law, international human rights law and international humanitarian law; \n\n Recalling its Conclusion No. 27 (XXXIII) and Conclusion No. 32 (XXXIV) on military attacks on refugee camps and settlements in Southern Africa and elsewhere; Conclusion 72 (XLIV) on personal security of refugees; Conclusion No. 48 (XXXVIII) on military or armed attacks on refugee camps and settlements; Conclusion No. 47 (XXXVIII) and Conclusion No. 84 (XLVII), on refugee children and adolescents, as well as Conclusion 64 (XLI) on refugee women and international protection; \n\n Recalling also United Nations Security Council resolution S\/RES\/1208 (1998) and S\/RES\/1296 (2000), and the two reports of the United Nations Secretary\u00adGeneral on the Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict18, noting in particular the recommendations made therein with respect to enhancing the security of refugee camps and settlements; \n\n Welcoming the discussion which took place on the civilian character of asylum in the context of the Global Consultations on International Protection;19 \n\n Noting that several international meetings have recently been held, aimed at identifying effective operational strategies for maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum;20 \n\n Reiterating that refugee camps and settlements should have an exclusively civilian and humanitarian character, that the grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act which should not be regarded as unfriendly by another State, as stated in the 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa and a number of EXCOM Conclusions, and that all actors, including refugees themselves, have the obligation to coop\u00ad erate in ensuring the peaceful and humanitarian character of refugee camps and settlements; \n\n Recognizing that the presence of armed elements in refugee camps or settlements; recruit\u00ad ment and training by government armed forces or organized armed groups; the use of such camps, intended to accommodate refugee populations on purely humanitarian grounds, for the internment of prisoners of war; as well as other forms of exploitation of refugee situations for the purpose of promoting military objectives are likely to expose refugees, par\u00ad ticularly women and children, to serious physical danger, inhibit the realization of durable solutions, in particular voluntary repatriation, but also local integration, jeopardize the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum and may threaten the national security of States, as well as inter\u00adState relations; \n\n Recognizing the special protection needs of refugee children and adolescents who, especially when living in camps where refugees are mixed with armed elements, are particularly vul\u00ad nerable to recruitment by government armed forces or organized armed groups; \n\n Reaffirming the importance of States, UNHCR and other relevant actors, integrating safety and security concerns from the outset of a refugee emergency into refugee camp manage\u00ad ment in a holistic manner; \n (a) Acknowledges that host States have the primary responsibility to ensure the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum by, inter alia, making all efforts to locate refugee camps and settlements at a reasonable distance from the border, maintaining law and order, curtailing the flow of arms into refugee camps and settlements, preventing their use for the internment of prisoners of war, as well as through the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation and internment of combatants; \n (b) Urges refugee\u00adhosting States to respect the civilian and humanitarian character of refu\u00ad gee camps by preventing their use for purposes which are incompatible with their civilian character; \n (c) Recommends that action taken by States to ensure respect for the civilian and humani\u00ad tarian character of asylum be guided, inter alia, by the following principles; \n (i) Respect for the right to seek asylum, and for the fundamental principle of non\u00ad refoulement, should be maintained at all times; \n (ii) Measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, sep\u00ad aration and internment of combatants should be taken as early as possible, preferably at the point of entry or at the first reception\/transit centres for new arrivals; \n (iii) To facilitate early identification and separation of combatants, registration of new arrivals should be conducted by means of a careful screening process; \n (iv) Refugee camps and settlements should benefit from adequate security arrange\u00ad ments to deter infiltration by armed elements and the strengthening of law and order; \n (v) Once identified, disarmed and separated from the refugee population, combat\u00ad ants should be interned at a safe location from the border; \n (vi) Where the granting of refugee status is based on group determination, civilian family members of combatants should be treated as refugees and should not be interned together with them; \n (vii) Combatants should not be considered as asylum\u00adseekers until the authorities have established within a reasonable timeframe that they have genuinely and permanently renounced military activities. Once this has been established, special procedures should be put in place for individual refugee status deter\u00ad mination, to ensure that those seeking asylum fulfil the criteria for the recogni\u00ad tion of refugee status. During the refugee status determination process, utmost attention should be paid to article 1F of the 1951 Convention, in order to avoid abuse of the asylum system by those who do not deserve international protection; \n (viii) Former child soldiers should benefit from special protection and assistance measures, in particular as regards their demobilization and rehabilitation; \n (ix) Where necessary, host States should develop, with assistance from UNHCR, operational guidelines in the context of group determination to exclude those individuals who are not deserving of international refugee protection; \n (d) Further to para 3 (b) above, calls upon UNHCR to convene a meeting of experts in sup\u00ad port of the elaboration of measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation, and internment of combatants, including the clarification of relevant procedures and standards, in consultation with States, United Nations Secre\u00ad tariat entities and agencies, and interested organizations, such as the ICRC, and report back to the Executive Committee on progress achieved; \n (e) Calls upon States to ensure that measures are taken to prevent the recruitment of refugees by government armed forces or organized armed groups, in particular of children, taking into account also that unaccompanied and separated children are even more vulner\u00ad able to recruitment than other children; \n (f) Calls upon the relevant United Nations organs and regional organizations, in pursuance of their respective mandates, as well as the international community at large, to mobi\u00ad lize adequate resources to support and assist host States in maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum, in line with the principles of international solidarity, co\u00adoperation, burden and responsibility sharing; \n (g) Calls upon UNHCR and the Department of Peacekeeping Operations of the United Nations Secretariat to enhance collaboration on all aspects of this complex matter, and as appropriate, to deploy, with the consent of host States, multi\u00addisciplinary assess\u00ad ment teams to an emerging crisis area in order to clarify the situation on the ground, evaluate security threats for refugee populations and consider appropriate practical responses; \n (h) Calls upon UNHCR to explore how it may develop, in consultation with relevant part\u00ad ners, its own institutional capacity to address insecurity in refugee camps, inter alia by assisting States to ensure the physical safety and dignity of refugees, building, as appro\u00ad priate, upon its protection and operational expertise.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167023,7 +167023,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2701, - "Paragraph": "The Executive Committee, \\n\\n Remaining seriously concerned by the continuing occurrence of military or armed attacks and other threats to the security of refugees, including the infiltration and presence of armed elements in refugee camps and settlements;17 \\n\\n Recalling the relevant provisions of international refugee law, international human rights law and international humanitarian law; \\n\\n Recalling its Conclusion No. 27 (XXXIII) and Conclusion No. 32 (XXXIV) on military attacks on refugee camps and settlements in Southern Africa and elsewhere; Conclusion 72 (XLIV) on personal security of refugees; Conclusion No. 48 (XXXVIII) on military or armed attacks on refugee camps and settlements; Conclusion No. 47 (XXXVIII) and Conclusion No. 84 (XLVII), on refugee children and adolescents, as well as Conclusion 64 (XLI) on refugee women and international protection; \\n\\n Recalling also United Nations Security Council resolution S\/RES\/1208 (1998) and S\/RES\/1296 (2000), and the two reports of the United Nations Secretary\u00adGeneral on the Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict18, noting in particular the recommendations made therein with respect to enhancing the security of refugee camps and settlements; \\n\\n Welcoming the discussion which took place on the civilian character of asylum in the context of the Global Consultations on International Protection;19 \\n\\n Noting that several international meetings have recently been held, aimed at identifying effective operational strategies for maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum;20 \\n\\n Reiterating that refugee camps and settlements should have an exclusively civilian and humanitarian character, that the grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act which should not be regarded as unfriendly by another State, as stated in the 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa and a number of EXCOM Conclusions, and that all actors, including refugees themselves, have the obligation to coop\u00ad erate in ensuring the peaceful and humanitarian character of refugee camps and settlements; \\n\\n Recognizing that the presence of armed elements in refugee camps or settlements; recruit\u00ad ment and training by government armed forces or organized armed groups; the use of such camps, intended to accommodate refugee populations on purely humanitarian grounds, for the internment of prisoners of war; as well as other forms of exploitation of refugee situations for the purpose of promoting military objectives are likely to expose refugees, par\u00ad ticularly women and children, to serious physical danger, inhibit the realization of durable solutions, in particular voluntary repatriation, but also local integration, jeopardize the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum and may threaten the national security of States, as well as inter\u00adState relations; \\n\\n Recognizing the special protection needs of refugee children and adolescents who, especially when living in camps where refugees are mixed with armed elements, are particularly vul\u00ad nerable to recruitment by government armed forces or organized armed groups; \\n\\n Reaffirming the importance of States, UNHCR and other relevant actors, integrating safety and security concerns from the outset of a refugee emergency into refugee camp manage\u00ad ment in a holistic manner; \\n (a) Acknowledges that host States have the primary responsibility to ensure the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum by, inter alia, making all efforts to locate refugee camps and settlements at a reasonable distance from the border, maintaining law and order, curtailing the flow of arms into refugee camps and settlements, preventing their use for the internment of prisoners of war, as well as through the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation and internment of combatants; \\n (b) Urges refugee\u00adhosting States to respect the civilian and humanitarian character of refu\u00ad gee camps by preventing their use for purposes which are incompatible with their civilian character; \\n (c) Recommends that action taken by States to ensure respect for the civilian and humani\u00ad tarian character of asylum be guided, inter alia, by the following principles; \\n (i) Respect for the right to seek asylum, and for the fundamental principle of non\u00ad refoulement, should be maintained at all times; \\n (ii) Measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, sep\u00ad aration and internment of combatants should be taken as early as possible, preferably at the point of entry or at the first reception\/transit centres for new arrivals; \\n (iii) To facilitate early identification and separation of combatants, registration of new arrivals should be conducted by means of a careful screening process; \\n (iv) Refugee camps and settlements should benefit from adequate security arrange\u00ad ments to deter infiltration by armed elements and the strengthening of law and order; \\n (v) Once identified, disarmed and separated from the refugee population, combat\u00ad ants should be interned at a safe location from the border; \\n (vi) Where the granting of refugee status is based on group determination, civilian family members of combatants should be treated as refugees and should not be interned together with them; \\n (vii) Combatants should not be considered as asylum\u00adseekers until the authorities have established within a reasonable timeframe that they have genuinely and permanently renounced military activities. Once this has been established, special procedures should be put in place for individual refugee status deter\u00ad mination, to ensure that those seeking asylum fulfil the criteria for the recogni\u00ad tion of refugee status. During the refugee status determination process, utmost attention should be paid to article 1F of the 1951 Convention, in order to avoid abuse of the asylum system by those who do not deserve international protection; \\n (viii) Former child soldiers should benefit from special protection and assistance measures, in particular as regards their demobilization and rehabilitation; \\n (ix) Where necessary, host States should develop, with assistance from UNHCR, operational guidelines in the context of group determination to exclude those individuals who are not deserving of international refugee protection; \\n (d) Further to para 3 (b) above, calls upon UNHCR to convene a meeting of experts in sup\u00ad port of the elaboration of measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation, and internment of combatants, including the clarification of relevant procedures and standards, in consultation with States, United Nations Secre\u00ad tariat entities and agencies, and interested organizations, such as the ICRC, and report back to the Executive Committee on progress achieved; \\n (e) Calls upon States to ensure that measures are taken to prevent the recruitment of refugees by government armed forces or organized armed groups, in particular of children, taking into account also that unaccompanied and separated children are even more vulner\u00ad able to recruitment than other children; \\n (f) Calls upon the relevant United Nations organs and regional organizations, in pursuance of their respective mandates, as well as the international community at large, to mobi\u00ad lize adequate resources to support and assist host States in maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum, in line with the principles of international solidarity, co\u00adoperation, burden and responsibility sharing; \\n (g) Calls upon UNHCR and the Department of Peacekeeping Operations of the United Nations Secretariat to enhance collaboration on all aspects of this complex matter, and as appropriate, to deploy, with the consent of host States, multi\u00addisciplinary assess\u00ad ment teams to an emerging crisis area in order to clarify the situation on the ground, evaluate security threats for refugee populations and consider appropriate practical responses; \\n (h) Calls upon UNHCR to explore how it may develop, in consultation with relevant part\u00ad ners, its own institutional capacity to address insecurity in refugee camps, inter alia by assisting States to ensure the physical safety and dignity of refugees, building, as appro\u00ad priate, upon its protection and operational expertise.", + "Paragraph": "The Executive Committee, \n\n Remaining seriously concerned by the continuing occurrence of military or armed attacks and other threats to the security of refugees, including the infiltration and presence of armed elements in refugee camps and settlements;17 \n\n Recalling the relevant provisions of international refugee law, international human rights law and international humanitarian law; \n\n Recalling its Conclusion No. 27 (XXXIII) and Conclusion No. 32 (XXXIV) on military attacks on refugee camps and settlements in Southern Africa and elsewhere; Conclusion 72 (XLIV) on personal security of refugees; Conclusion No. 48 (XXXVIII) on military or armed attacks on refugee camps and settlements; Conclusion No. 47 (XXXVIII) and Conclusion No. 84 (XLVII), on refugee children and adolescents, as well as Conclusion 64 (XLI) on refugee women and international protection; \n\n Recalling also United Nations Security Council resolution S\/RES\/1208 (1998) and S\/RES\/1296 (2000), and the two reports of the United Nations Secretary\u00adGeneral on the Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict18, noting in particular the recommendations made therein with respect to enhancing the security of refugee camps and settlements; \n\n Welcoming the discussion which took place on the civilian character of asylum in the context of the Global Consultations on International Protection;19 \n\n Noting that several international meetings have recently been held, aimed at identifying effective operational strategies for maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum;20 \n\n Reiterating that refugee camps and settlements should have an exclusively civilian and humanitarian character, that the grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act which should not be regarded as unfriendly by another State, as stated in the 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa and a number of EXCOM Conclusions, and that all actors, including refugees themselves, have the obligation to coop\u00ad erate in ensuring the peaceful and humanitarian character of refugee camps and settlements; \n\n Recognizing that the presence of armed elements in refugee camps or settlements; recruit\u00ad ment and training by government armed forces or organized armed groups; the use of such camps, intended to accommodate refugee populations on purely humanitarian grounds, for the internment of prisoners of war; as well as other forms of exploitation of refugee situations for the purpose of promoting military objectives are likely to expose refugees, par\u00ad ticularly women and children, to serious physical danger, inhibit the realization of durable solutions, in particular voluntary repatriation, but also local integration, jeopardize the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum and may threaten the national security of States, as well as inter\u00adState relations; \n\n Recognizing the special protection needs of refugee children and adolescents who, especially when living in camps where refugees are mixed with armed elements, are particularly vul\u00ad nerable to recruitment by government armed forces or organized armed groups; \n\n Reaffirming the importance of States, UNHCR and other relevant actors, integrating safety and security concerns from the outset of a refugee emergency into refugee camp manage\u00ad ment in a holistic manner; \n (a) Acknowledges that host States have the primary responsibility to ensure the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum by, inter alia, making all efforts to locate refugee camps and settlements at a reasonable distance from the border, maintaining law and order, curtailing the flow of arms into refugee camps and settlements, preventing their use for the internment of prisoners of war, as well as through the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation and internment of combatants; \n (b) Urges refugee\u00adhosting States to respect the civilian and humanitarian character of refu\u00ad gee camps by preventing their use for purposes which are incompatible with their civilian character; \n (c) Recommends that action taken by States to ensure respect for the civilian and humani\u00ad tarian character of asylum be guided, inter alia, by the following principles; \n (i) Respect for the right to seek asylum, and for the fundamental principle of non\u00ad refoulement, should be maintained at all times; \n (ii) Measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, sep\u00ad aration and internment of combatants should be taken as early as possible, preferably at the point of entry or at the first reception\/transit centres for new arrivals; \n (iii) To facilitate early identification and separation of combatants, registration of new arrivals should be conducted by means of a careful screening process; \n (iv) Refugee camps and settlements should benefit from adequate security arrange\u00ad ments to deter infiltration by armed elements and the strengthening of law and order; \n (v) Once identified, disarmed and separated from the refugee population, combat\u00ad ants should be interned at a safe location from the border; \n (vi) Where the granting of refugee status is based on group determination, civilian family members of combatants should be treated as refugees and should not be interned together with them; \n (vii) Combatants should not be considered as asylum\u00adseekers until the authorities have established within a reasonable timeframe that they have genuinely and permanently renounced military activities. Once this has been established, special procedures should be put in place for individual refugee status deter\u00ad mination, to ensure that those seeking asylum fulfil the criteria for the recogni\u00ad tion of refugee status. During the refugee status determination process, utmost attention should be paid to article 1F of the 1951 Convention, in order to avoid abuse of the asylum system by those who do not deserve international protection; \n (viii) Former child soldiers should benefit from special protection and assistance measures, in particular as regards their demobilization and rehabilitation; \n (ix) Where necessary, host States should develop, with assistance from UNHCR, operational guidelines in the context of group determination to exclude those individuals who are not deserving of international refugee protection; \n (d) Further to para 3 (b) above, calls upon UNHCR to convene a meeting of experts in sup\u00ad port of the elaboration of measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation, and internment of combatants, including the clarification of relevant procedures and standards, in consultation with States, United Nations Secre\u00ad tariat entities and agencies, and interested organizations, such as the ICRC, and report back to the Executive Committee on progress achieved; \n (e) Calls upon States to ensure that measures are taken to prevent the recruitment of refugees by government armed forces or organized armed groups, in particular of children, taking into account also that unaccompanied and separated children are even more vulner\u00ad able to recruitment than other children; \n (f) Calls upon the relevant United Nations organs and regional organizations, in pursuance of their respective mandates, as well as the international community at large, to mobi\u00ad lize adequate resources to support and assist host States in maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum, in line with the principles of international solidarity, co\u00adoperation, burden and responsibility sharing; \n (g) Calls upon UNHCR and the Department of Peacekeeping Operations of the United Nations Secretariat to enhance collaboration on all aspects of this complex matter, and as appropriate, to deploy, with the consent of host States, multi\u00addisciplinary assess\u00ad ment teams to an emerging crisis area in order to clarify the situation on the ground, evaluate security threats for refugee populations and consider appropriate practical responses; \n (h) Calls upon UNHCR to explore how it may develop, in consultation with relevant part\u00ad ners, its own institutional capacity to address insecurity in refugee camps, inter alia by assisting States to ensure the physical safety and dignity of refugees, building, as appro\u00ad priate, upon its protection and operational expertise.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167034,14 +167034,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "84 (XLVII), on refugee children and adolescents, as well as Conclusion 64 (XLI) on refugee women and international protection; \\n\\n Recalling also United Nations Security Council resolution S\/RES\/1208 (1998) and S\/RES\/1296 (2000), and the two reports of the United Nations Secretary\u00adGeneral on the Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict18, noting in particular the recommendations made therein with respect to enhancing the security of refugee camps and settlements; \\n\\n Welcoming the discussion which took place on the civilian character of asylum in the context of the Global Consultations on International Protection;19 \\n\\n Noting that several international meetings have recently been held, aimed at identifying effective operational strategies for maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum;20 \\n\\n Reiterating that refugee camps and settlements should have an exclusively civilian and humanitarian character, that the grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act which should not be regarded as unfriendly by another State, as stated in the 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa and a number of EXCOM Conclusions, and that all actors, including refugees themselves, have the obligation to coop\u00ad erate in ensuring the peaceful and humanitarian character of refugee camps and settlements; \\n\\n Recognizing that the presence of armed elements in refugee camps or settlements; recruit\u00ad ment and training by government armed forces or organized armed groups; the use of such camps, intended to accommodate refugee populations on purely humanitarian grounds, for the internment of prisoners of war; as well as other forms of exploitation of refugee situations for the purpose of promoting military objectives are likely to expose refugees, par\u00ad ticularly women and children, to serious physical danger, inhibit the realization of durable solutions, in particular voluntary repatriation, but also local integration, jeopardize the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum and may threaten the national security of States, as well as inter\u00adState relations; \\n\\n Recognizing the special protection needs of refugee children and adolescents who, especially when living in camps where refugees are mixed with armed elements, are particularly vul\u00ad nerable to recruitment by government armed forces or organized armed groups; \\n\\n Reaffirming the importance of States, UNHCR and other relevant actors, integrating safety and security concerns from the outset of a refugee emergency into refugee camp manage\u00ad ment in a holistic manner; \\n (a) Acknowledges that host States have the primary responsibility to ensure the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum by, inter alia, making all efforts to locate refugee camps and settlements at a reasonable distance from the border, maintaining law and order, curtailing the flow of arms into refugee camps and settlements, preventing their use for the internment of prisoners of war, as well as through the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation and internment of combatants; \\n (b) Urges refugee\u00adhosting States to respect the civilian and humanitarian character of refu\u00ad gee camps by preventing their use for purposes which are incompatible with their civilian character; \\n (c) Recommends that action taken by States to ensure respect for the civilian and humani\u00ad tarian character of asylum be guided, inter alia, by the following principles; \\n (i) Respect for the right to seek asylum, and for the fundamental principle of non\u00ad refoulement, should be maintained at all times; \\n (ii) Measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, sep\u00ad aration and internment of combatants should be taken as early as possible, preferably at the point of entry or at the first reception\/transit centres for new arrivals; \\n (iii) To facilitate early identification and separation of combatants, registration of new arrivals should be conducted by means of a careful screening process; \\n (iv) Refugee camps and settlements should benefit from adequate security arrange\u00ad ments to deter infiltration by armed elements and the strengthening of law and order; \\n (v) Once identified, disarmed and separated from the refugee population, combat\u00ad ants should be interned at a safe location from the border; \\n (vi) Where the granting of refugee status is based on group determination, civilian family members of combatants should be treated as refugees and should not be interned together with them; \\n (vii) Combatants should not be considered as asylum\u00adseekers until the authorities have established within a reasonable timeframe that they have genuinely and permanently renounced military activities.", + "Sentence": "84 (XLVII), on refugee children and adolescents, as well as Conclusion 64 (XLI) on refugee women and international protection; \n\n Recalling also United Nations Security Council resolution S\/RES\/1208 (1998) and S\/RES\/1296 (2000), and the two reports of the United Nations Secretary\u00adGeneral on the Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict18, noting in particular the recommendations made therein with respect to enhancing the security of refugee camps and settlements; \n\n Welcoming the discussion which took place on the civilian character of asylum in the context of the Global Consultations on International Protection;19 \n\n Noting that several international meetings have recently been held, aimed at identifying effective operational strategies for maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum;20 \n\n Reiterating that refugee camps and settlements should have an exclusively civilian and humanitarian character, that the grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act which should not be regarded as unfriendly by another State, as stated in the 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa and a number of EXCOM Conclusions, and that all actors, including refugees themselves, have the obligation to coop\u00ad erate in ensuring the peaceful and humanitarian character of refugee camps and settlements; \n\n Recognizing that the presence of armed elements in refugee camps or settlements; recruit\u00ad ment and training by government armed forces or organized armed groups; the use of such camps, intended to accommodate refugee populations on purely humanitarian grounds, for the internment of prisoners of war; as well as other forms of exploitation of refugee situations for the purpose of promoting military objectives are likely to expose refugees, par\u00ad ticularly women and children, to serious physical danger, inhibit the realization of durable solutions, in particular voluntary repatriation, but also local integration, jeopardize the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum and may threaten the national security of States, as well as inter\u00adState relations; \n\n Recognizing the special protection needs of refugee children and adolescents who, especially when living in camps where refugees are mixed with armed elements, are particularly vul\u00ad nerable to recruitment by government armed forces or organized armed groups; \n\n Reaffirming the importance of States, UNHCR and other relevant actors, integrating safety and security concerns from the outset of a refugee emergency into refugee camp manage\u00ad ment in a holistic manner; \n (a) Acknowledges that host States have the primary responsibility to ensure the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum by, inter alia, making all efforts to locate refugee camps and settlements at a reasonable distance from the border, maintaining law and order, curtailing the flow of arms into refugee camps and settlements, preventing their use for the internment of prisoners of war, as well as through the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation and internment of combatants; \n (b) Urges refugee\u00adhosting States to respect the civilian and humanitarian character of refu\u00ad gee camps by preventing their use for purposes which are incompatible with their civilian character; \n (c) Recommends that action taken by States to ensure respect for the civilian and humani\u00ad tarian character of asylum be guided, inter alia, by the following principles; \n (i) Respect for the right to seek asylum, and for the fundamental principle of non\u00ad refoulement, should be maintained at all times; \n (ii) Measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, sep\u00ad aration and internment of combatants should be taken as early as possible, preferably at the point of entry or at the first reception\/transit centres for new arrivals; \n (iii) To facilitate early identification and separation of combatants, registration of new arrivals should be conducted by means of a careful screening process; \n (iv) Refugee camps and settlements should benefit from adequate security arrange\u00ad ments to deter infiltration by armed elements and the strengthening of law and order; \n (v) Once identified, disarmed and separated from the refugee population, combat\u00ad ants should be interned at a safe location from the border; \n (vi) Where the granting of refugee status is based on group determination, civilian family members of combatants should be treated as refugees and should not be interned together with them; \n (vii) Combatants should not be considered as asylum\u00adseekers until the authorities have established within a reasonable timeframe that they have genuinely and permanently renounced military activities.", "newParagraph": "executive committee nn remaining seriously concerned continuing occurrence military armed attack threat security refugee including infiltration presence armed element refugee camp settlements17 nn recalling relevant provision international refugee law international human right law international humanitarian law nn recalling conclusion 27 xxxiii conclusion 32 xxxiv military attack refugee camp settlement southern africa elsewhere conclusion 72 xliv personal security refugee conclusion 48 xxxviii military armed attack refugee camp settlement conclusion 47 xxxviii conclusion 84 xlvii refugee child adolescent well conclusion 64 xli refugee woman international protection nn recalling also united nation security council resolution sres1208 1998 sres1296 2000 two report united nation secretary general protection civilian armed conflict18 noting particular recommendation made therein respect enhancing security refugee camp settlement nn welcoming discussion took place civilian character asylum context global consultation international protection19 nn noting several international meeting recently held aimed identifying effective operational strategy maintaining civilian humanitarian character asylum20 nn reiterating refugee camp settlement exclusively civilian humanitarian character grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act regarded unfriendly another state stated 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa number excom conclusion actor including refugee obligation coop erate ensuring peaceful humanitarian character refugee camp settlement nn recognizing presence armed element refugee camp settlement recruit ment training government armed force organized armed group use camp intended accommodate refugee population purely humanitarian ground internment prisoner war well form exploitation refugee situation purpose promoting military objective likely expose refugee par ticularly woman child serious physical danger inhibit realization durable solution particular voluntary repatriation also local integration jeopardize civilian humanitarian character asylum may threaten national security state well inter state relation nn recognizing special protection need refugee child adolescent especially living camp refugee mixed armed element particularly vul nerable recruitment government armed force organized armed group nn reaffirming importance state unhcr relevant actor integrating safety security concern outset refugee emergency refugee camp manage ment holistic manner n acknowledges host state primary responsibility ensure civilian humanitarian character asylum inter alia making effort locate refugee camp settlement reasonable distance border maintaining law order curtailing flow arm refugee camp settlement preventing use internment prisoner war well disarmament armed element identification separation internment combatant n b urge refugee hosting state respect civilian humanitarian character refu gee camp preventing use purpose incompatible civilian character n c recommends action taken state ensure respect civilian humani tarian character asylum guided inter alia following principle n respect right seek asylum fundamental principle non refoulement maintained time n ii measure disarmament armed element identification sep aration internment combatant taken early possible preferably point entry first receptiontransit centre new arrival n iii facilitate early identification separation combatant registration new arrival conducted mean careful screening process n iv refugee camp settlement benefit adequate security arrange ments deter infiltration armed element strengthening law order n v identified disarmed separated refugee population combat ant interned safe location border n vi granting refugee status based group determination civilian family member combatant treated refugee interned together n vii combatant considered asylum seeker authority established within reasonable timeframe genuinely permanently renounced military activity established special procedure put place individual refugee status deter mination ensure seeking asylum fulfil criterion recogni tion refugee status refugee status determination process utmost attention paid article 1f 1951 convention order avoid abuse asylum system deserve international protection n viii former child soldier benefit special protection assistance measure particular regard demobilization rehabilitation n ix necessary host state develop assistance unhcr operational guideline context group determination exclude individual deserving international refugee protection n para 3 b call upon unhcr convene meeting expert sup port elaboration measure disarmament armed element identification separation internment combatant including clarification relevant procedure standard consultation state united nation secre tariat entity agency interested organization icrc report back executive committee progress achieved n e call upon state ensure measure taken prevent recruitment refugee government armed force organized armed group particular child taking account also unaccompanied separated child even vulner able recruitment child n f call upon relevant united nation organ regional organization pursuance respective mandate well international community large mobi lize adequate resource support assist host state maintaining civilian humanitarian character asylum line principle international solidarity co operation burden responsibility sharing n g call upon unhcr department peacekeeping operation united nation secretariat enhance collaboration aspect complex matter appropriate deploy consent host state multi disciplinary ass ment team emerging crisis area order clarify situation ground evaluate security threat refugee population consider appropriate practical response n h call upon unhcr explore may develop consultation relevant part ners institutional capacity address insecurity refugee camp inter alia assisting state ensure physical safety dignity refugee building appro priate upon protection operational expertise", "ProcessedSent": "84 xlvii refugee child adolescent well conclusion 64 xli refugee woman international protection nn recalling also united nation security council resolution sres1208 1998 sres1296 2000 two report united nation secretary general protection civilian armed conflict18 noting particular recommendation made therein respect enhancing security refugee camp settlement nn welcoming discussion took place civilian character asylum context global consultation international protection19 nn noting several international meeting recently held aimed identifying effective operational strategy maintaining civilian humanitarian character asylum20 nn reiterating refugee camp settlement exclusively civilian humanitarian character grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act regarded unfriendly another state stated 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa number excom conclusion actor including refugee obligation coop erate ensuring peaceful humanitarian character refugee camp settlement nn recognizing presence armed element refugee camp settlement recruit ment training government armed force organized armed group use camp intended accommodate refugee population purely humanitarian ground internment prisoner war well form exploitation refugee situation purpose promoting military objective likely expose refugee par ticularly woman child serious physical danger inhibit realization durable solution particular voluntary repatriation also local integration jeopardize civilian humanitarian character asylum may threaten national security state well inter state relation nn recognizing special protection need refugee child adolescent especially living camp refugee mixed armed element particularly vul nerable recruitment government armed force organized armed group nn reaffirming importance state unhcr relevant actor integrating safety security concern outset refugee emergency refugee camp manage ment holistic manner n acknowledges host state primary responsibility ensure civilian humanitarian character asylum inter alia making effort locate refugee camp settlement reasonable distance border maintaining law order curtailing flow arm refugee camp settlement preventing use internment prisoner war well disarmament armed element identification separation internment combatant n b urge refugee hosting state respect civilian humanitarian character refu gee camp preventing use purpose incompatible civilian character n c recommends action taken state ensure respect civilian humani tarian character asylum guided inter alia following principle n respect right seek asylum fundamental principle non refoulement maintained time n ii measure disarmament armed element identification sep aration internment combatant taken early possible preferably point entry first receptiontransit centre new arrival n iii facilitate early identification separation combatant registration new arrival conducted mean careful screening process n iv refugee camp settlement benefit adequate security arrange ments deter infiltration armed element strengthening law order n v identified disarmed separated refugee population combat ant interned safe location border n vi granting refugee status based group determination civilian family member combatant treated refugee interned together n vii combatant considered asylum seeker authority established within reasonable timeframe genuinely permanently renounced military activity", "SentID": 9279 }, { "ParagraphID": 2701, - "Paragraph": "The Executive Committee, \\n\\n Remaining seriously concerned by the continuing occurrence of military or armed attacks and other threats to the security of refugees, including the infiltration and presence of armed elements in refugee camps and settlements;17 \\n\\n Recalling the relevant provisions of international refugee law, international human rights law and international humanitarian law; \\n\\n Recalling its Conclusion No. 27 (XXXIII) and Conclusion No. 32 (XXXIV) on military attacks on refugee camps and settlements in Southern Africa and elsewhere; Conclusion 72 (XLIV) on personal security of refugees; Conclusion No. 48 (XXXVIII) on military or armed attacks on refugee camps and settlements; Conclusion No. 47 (XXXVIII) and Conclusion No. 84 (XLVII), on refugee children and adolescents, as well as Conclusion 64 (XLI) on refugee women and international protection; \\n\\n Recalling also United Nations Security Council resolution S\/RES\/1208 (1998) and S\/RES\/1296 (2000), and the two reports of the United Nations Secretary\u00adGeneral on the Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict18, noting in particular the recommendations made therein with respect to enhancing the security of refugee camps and settlements; \\n\\n Welcoming the discussion which took place on the civilian character of asylum in the context of the Global Consultations on International Protection;19 \\n\\n Noting that several international meetings have recently been held, aimed at identifying effective operational strategies for maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum;20 \\n\\n Reiterating that refugee camps and settlements should have an exclusively civilian and humanitarian character, that the grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act which should not be regarded as unfriendly by another State, as stated in the 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa and a number of EXCOM Conclusions, and that all actors, including refugees themselves, have the obligation to coop\u00ad erate in ensuring the peaceful and humanitarian character of refugee camps and settlements; \\n\\n Recognizing that the presence of armed elements in refugee camps or settlements; recruit\u00ad ment and training by government armed forces or organized armed groups; the use of such camps, intended to accommodate refugee populations on purely humanitarian grounds, for the internment of prisoners of war; as well as other forms of exploitation of refugee situations for the purpose of promoting military objectives are likely to expose refugees, par\u00ad ticularly women and children, to serious physical danger, inhibit the realization of durable solutions, in particular voluntary repatriation, but also local integration, jeopardize the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum and may threaten the national security of States, as well as inter\u00adState relations; \\n\\n Recognizing the special protection needs of refugee children and adolescents who, especially when living in camps where refugees are mixed with armed elements, are particularly vul\u00ad nerable to recruitment by government armed forces or organized armed groups; \\n\\n Reaffirming the importance of States, UNHCR and other relevant actors, integrating safety and security concerns from the outset of a refugee emergency into refugee camp manage\u00ad ment in a holistic manner; \\n (a) Acknowledges that host States have the primary responsibility to ensure the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum by, inter alia, making all efforts to locate refugee camps and settlements at a reasonable distance from the border, maintaining law and order, curtailing the flow of arms into refugee camps and settlements, preventing their use for the internment of prisoners of war, as well as through the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation and internment of combatants; \\n (b) Urges refugee\u00adhosting States to respect the civilian and humanitarian character of refu\u00ad gee camps by preventing their use for purposes which are incompatible with their civilian character; \\n (c) Recommends that action taken by States to ensure respect for the civilian and humani\u00ad tarian character of asylum be guided, inter alia, by the following principles; \\n (i) Respect for the right to seek asylum, and for the fundamental principle of non\u00ad refoulement, should be maintained at all times; \\n (ii) Measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, sep\u00ad aration and internment of combatants should be taken as early as possible, preferably at the point of entry or at the first reception\/transit centres for new arrivals; \\n (iii) To facilitate early identification and separation of combatants, registration of new arrivals should be conducted by means of a careful screening process; \\n (iv) Refugee camps and settlements should benefit from adequate security arrange\u00ad ments to deter infiltration by armed elements and the strengthening of law and order; \\n (v) Once identified, disarmed and separated from the refugee population, combat\u00ad ants should be interned at a safe location from the border; \\n (vi) Where the granting of refugee status is based on group determination, civilian family members of combatants should be treated as refugees and should not be interned together with them; \\n (vii) Combatants should not be considered as asylum\u00adseekers until the authorities have established within a reasonable timeframe that they have genuinely and permanently renounced military activities. Once this has been established, special procedures should be put in place for individual refugee status deter\u00ad mination, to ensure that those seeking asylum fulfil the criteria for the recogni\u00ad tion of refugee status. During the refugee status determination process, utmost attention should be paid to article 1F of the 1951 Convention, in order to avoid abuse of the asylum system by those who do not deserve international protection; \\n (viii) Former child soldiers should benefit from special protection and assistance measures, in particular as regards their demobilization and rehabilitation; \\n (ix) Where necessary, host States should develop, with assistance from UNHCR, operational guidelines in the context of group determination to exclude those individuals who are not deserving of international refugee protection; \\n (d) Further to para 3 (b) above, calls upon UNHCR to convene a meeting of experts in sup\u00ad port of the elaboration of measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation, and internment of combatants, including the clarification of relevant procedures and standards, in consultation with States, United Nations Secre\u00ad tariat entities and agencies, and interested organizations, such as the ICRC, and report back to the Executive Committee on progress achieved; \\n (e) Calls upon States to ensure that measures are taken to prevent the recruitment of refugees by government armed forces or organized armed groups, in particular of children, taking into account also that unaccompanied and separated children are even more vulner\u00ad able to recruitment than other children; \\n (f) Calls upon the relevant United Nations organs and regional organizations, in pursuance of their respective mandates, as well as the international community at large, to mobi\u00ad lize adequate resources to support and assist host States in maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum, in line with the principles of international solidarity, co\u00adoperation, burden and responsibility sharing; \\n (g) Calls upon UNHCR and the Department of Peacekeeping Operations of the United Nations Secretariat to enhance collaboration on all aspects of this complex matter, and as appropriate, to deploy, with the consent of host States, multi\u00addisciplinary assess\u00ad ment teams to an emerging crisis area in order to clarify the situation on the ground, evaluate security threats for refugee populations and consider appropriate practical responses; \\n (h) Calls upon UNHCR to explore how it may develop, in consultation with relevant part\u00ad ners, its own institutional capacity to address insecurity in refugee camps, inter alia by assisting States to ensure the physical safety and dignity of refugees, building, as appro\u00ad priate, upon its protection and operational expertise.", + "Paragraph": "The Executive Committee, \n\n Remaining seriously concerned by the continuing occurrence of military or armed attacks and other threats to the security of refugees, including the infiltration and presence of armed elements in refugee camps and settlements;17 \n\n Recalling the relevant provisions of international refugee law, international human rights law and international humanitarian law; \n\n Recalling its Conclusion No. 27 (XXXIII) and Conclusion No. 32 (XXXIV) on military attacks on refugee camps and settlements in Southern Africa and elsewhere; Conclusion 72 (XLIV) on personal security of refugees; Conclusion No. 48 (XXXVIII) on military or armed attacks on refugee camps and settlements; Conclusion No. 47 (XXXVIII) and Conclusion No. 84 (XLVII), on refugee children and adolescents, as well as Conclusion 64 (XLI) on refugee women and international protection; \n\n Recalling also United Nations Security Council resolution S\/RES\/1208 (1998) and S\/RES\/1296 (2000), and the two reports of the United Nations Secretary\u00adGeneral on the Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict18, noting in particular the recommendations made therein with respect to enhancing the security of refugee camps and settlements; \n\n Welcoming the discussion which took place on the civilian character of asylum in the context of the Global Consultations on International Protection;19 \n\n Noting that several international meetings have recently been held, aimed at identifying effective operational strategies for maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum;20 \n\n Reiterating that refugee camps and settlements should have an exclusively civilian and humanitarian character, that the grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act which should not be regarded as unfriendly by another State, as stated in the 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa and a number of EXCOM Conclusions, and that all actors, including refugees themselves, have the obligation to coop\u00ad erate in ensuring the peaceful and humanitarian character of refugee camps and settlements; \n\n Recognizing that the presence of armed elements in refugee camps or settlements; recruit\u00ad ment and training by government armed forces or organized armed groups; the use of such camps, intended to accommodate refugee populations on purely humanitarian grounds, for the internment of prisoners of war; as well as other forms of exploitation of refugee situations for the purpose of promoting military objectives are likely to expose refugees, par\u00ad ticularly women and children, to serious physical danger, inhibit the realization of durable solutions, in particular voluntary repatriation, but also local integration, jeopardize the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum and may threaten the national security of States, as well as inter\u00adState relations; \n\n Recognizing the special protection needs of refugee children and adolescents who, especially when living in camps where refugees are mixed with armed elements, are particularly vul\u00ad nerable to recruitment by government armed forces or organized armed groups; \n\n Reaffirming the importance of States, UNHCR and other relevant actors, integrating safety and security concerns from the outset of a refugee emergency into refugee camp manage\u00ad ment in a holistic manner; \n (a) Acknowledges that host States have the primary responsibility to ensure the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum by, inter alia, making all efforts to locate refugee camps and settlements at a reasonable distance from the border, maintaining law and order, curtailing the flow of arms into refugee camps and settlements, preventing their use for the internment of prisoners of war, as well as through the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation and internment of combatants; \n (b) Urges refugee\u00adhosting States to respect the civilian and humanitarian character of refu\u00ad gee camps by preventing their use for purposes which are incompatible with their civilian character; \n (c) Recommends that action taken by States to ensure respect for the civilian and humani\u00ad tarian character of asylum be guided, inter alia, by the following principles; \n (i) Respect for the right to seek asylum, and for the fundamental principle of non\u00ad refoulement, should be maintained at all times; \n (ii) Measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, sep\u00ad aration and internment of combatants should be taken as early as possible, preferably at the point of entry or at the first reception\/transit centres for new arrivals; \n (iii) To facilitate early identification and separation of combatants, registration of new arrivals should be conducted by means of a careful screening process; \n (iv) Refugee camps and settlements should benefit from adequate security arrange\u00ad ments to deter infiltration by armed elements and the strengthening of law and order; \n (v) Once identified, disarmed and separated from the refugee population, combat\u00ad ants should be interned at a safe location from the border; \n (vi) Where the granting of refugee status is based on group determination, civilian family members of combatants should be treated as refugees and should not be interned together with them; \n (vii) Combatants should not be considered as asylum\u00adseekers until the authorities have established within a reasonable timeframe that they have genuinely and permanently renounced military activities. Once this has been established, special procedures should be put in place for individual refugee status deter\u00ad mination, to ensure that those seeking asylum fulfil the criteria for the recogni\u00ad tion of refugee status. During the refugee status determination process, utmost attention should be paid to article 1F of the 1951 Convention, in order to avoid abuse of the asylum system by those who do not deserve international protection; \n (viii) Former child soldiers should benefit from special protection and assistance measures, in particular as regards their demobilization and rehabilitation; \n (ix) Where necessary, host States should develop, with assistance from UNHCR, operational guidelines in the context of group determination to exclude those individuals who are not deserving of international refugee protection; \n (d) Further to para 3 (b) above, calls upon UNHCR to convene a meeting of experts in sup\u00ad port of the elaboration of measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation, and internment of combatants, including the clarification of relevant procedures and standards, in consultation with States, United Nations Secre\u00ad tariat entities and agencies, and interested organizations, such as the ICRC, and report back to the Executive Committee on progress achieved; \n (e) Calls upon States to ensure that measures are taken to prevent the recruitment of refugees by government armed forces or organized armed groups, in particular of children, taking into account also that unaccompanied and separated children are even more vulner\u00ad able to recruitment than other children; \n (f) Calls upon the relevant United Nations organs and regional organizations, in pursuance of their respective mandates, as well as the international community at large, to mobi\u00ad lize adequate resources to support and assist host States in maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum, in line with the principles of international solidarity, co\u00adoperation, burden and responsibility sharing; \n (g) Calls upon UNHCR and the Department of Peacekeeping Operations of the United Nations Secretariat to enhance collaboration on all aspects of this complex matter, and as appropriate, to deploy, with the consent of host States, multi\u00addisciplinary assess\u00ad ment teams to an emerging crisis area in order to clarify the situation on the ground, evaluate security threats for refugee populations and consider appropriate practical responses; \n (h) Calls upon UNHCR to explore how it may develop, in consultation with relevant part\u00ad ners, its own institutional capacity to address insecurity in refugee camps, inter alia by assisting States to ensure the physical safety and dignity of refugees, building, as appro\u00ad priate, upon its protection and operational expertise.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167059,7 +167059,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2701, - "Paragraph": "The Executive Committee, \\n\\n Remaining seriously concerned by the continuing occurrence of military or armed attacks and other threats to the security of refugees, including the infiltration and presence of armed elements in refugee camps and settlements;17 \\n\\n Recalling the relevant provisions of international refugee law, international human rights law and international humanitarian law; \\n\\n Recalling its Conclusion No. 27 (XXXIII) and Conclusion No. 32 (XXXIV) on military attacks on refugee camps and settlements in Southern Africa and elsewhere; Conclusion 72 (XLIV) on personal security of refugees; Conclusion No. 48 (XXXVIII) on military or armed attacks on refugee camps and settlements; Conclusion No. 47 (XXXVIII) and Conclusion No. 84 (XLVII), on refugee children and adolescents, as well as Conclusion 64 (XLI) on refugee women and international protection; \\n\\n Recalling also United Nations Security Council resolution S\/RES\/1208 (1998) and S\/RES\/1296 (2000), and the two reports of the United Nations Secretary\u00adGeneral on the Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict18, noting in particular the recommendations made therein with respect to enhancing the security of refugee camps and settlements; \\n\\n Welcoming the discussion which took place on the civilian character of asylum in the context of the Global Consultations on International Protection;19 \\n\\n Noting that several international meetings have recently been held, aimed at identifying effective operational strategies for maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum;20 \\n\\n Reiterating that refugee camps and settlements should have an exclusively civilian and humanitarian character, that the grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act which should not be regarded as unfriendly by another State, as stated in the 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa and a number of EXCOM Conclusions, and that all actors, including refugees themselves, have the obligation to coop\u00ad erate in ensuring the peaceful and humanitarian character of refugee camps and settlements; \\n\\n Recognizing that the presence of armed elements in refugee camps or settlements; recruit\u00ad ment and training by government armed forces or organized armed groups; the use of such camps, intended to accommodate refugee populations on purely humanitarian grounds, for the internment of prisoners of war; as well as other forms of exploitation of refugee situations for the purpose of promoting military objectives are likely to expose refugees, par\u00ad ticularly women and children, to serious physical danger, inhibit the realization of durable solutions, in particular voluntary repatriation, but also local integration, jeopardize the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum and may threaten the national security of States, as well as inter\u00adState relations; \\n\\n Recognizing the special protection needs of refugee children and adolescents who, especially when living in camps where refugees are mixed with armed elements, are particularly vul\u00ad nerable to recruitment by government armed forces or organized armed groups; \\n\\n Reaffirming the importance of States, UNHCR and other relevant actors, integrating safety and security concerns from the outset of a refugee emergency into refugee camp manage\u00ad ment in a holistic manner; \\n (a) Acknowledges that host States have the primary responsibility to ensure the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum by, inter alia, making all efforts to locate refugee camps and settlements at a reasonable distance from the border, maintaining law and order, curtailing the flow of arms into refugee camps and settlements, preventing their use for the internment of prisoners of war, as well as through the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation and internment of combatants; \\n (b) Urges refugee\u00adhosting States to respect the civilian and humanitarian character of refu\u00ad gee camps by preventing their use for purposes which are incompatible with their civilian character; \\n (c) Recommends that action taken by States to ensure respect for the civilian and humani\u00ad tarian character of asylum be guided, inter alia, by the following principles; \\n (i) Respect for the right to seek asylum, and for the fundamental principle of non\u00ad refoulement, should be maintained at all times; \\n (ii) Measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, sep\u00ad aration and internment of combatants should be taken as early as possible, preferably at the point of entry or at the first reception\/transit centres for new arrivals; \\n (iii) To facilitate early identification and separation of combatants, registration of new arrivals should be conducted by means of a careful screening process; \\n (iv) Refugee camps and settlements should benefit from adequate security arrange\u00ad ments to deter infiltration by armed elements and the strengthening of law and order; \\n (v) Once identified, disarmed and separated from the refugee population, combat\u00ad ants should be interned at a safe location from the border; \\n (vi) Where the granting of refugee status is based on group determination, civilian family members of combatants should be treated as refugees and should not be interned together with them; \\n (vii) Combatants should not be considered as asylum\u00adseekers until the authorities have established within a reasonable timeframe that they have genuinely and permanently renounced military activities. Once this has been established, special procedures should be put in place for individual refugee status deter\u00ad mination, to ensure that those seeking asylum fulfil the criteria for the recogni\u00ad tion of refugee status. During the refugee status determination process, utmost attention should be paid to article 1F of the 1951 Convention, in order to avoid abuse of the asylum system by those who do not deserve international protection; \\n (viii) Former child soldiers should benefit from special protection and assistance measures, in particular as regards their demobilization and rehabilitation; \\n (ix) Where necessary, host States should develop, with assistance from UNHCR, operational guidelines in the context of group determination to exclude those individuals who are not deserving of international refugee protection; \\n (d) Further to para 3 (b) above, calls upon UNHCR to convene a meeting of experts in sup\u00ad port of the elaboration of measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation, and internment of combatants, including the clarification of relevant procedures and standards, in consultation with States, United Nations Secre\u00ad tariat entities and agencies, and interested organizations, such as the ICRC, and report back to the Executive Committee on progress achieved; \\n (e) Calls upon States to ensure that measures are taken to prevent the recruitment of refugees by government armed forces or organized armed groups, in particular of children, taking into account also that unaccompanied and separated children are even more vulner\u00ad able to recruitment than other children; \\n (f) Calls upon the relevant United Nations organs and regional organizations, in pursuance of their respective mandates, as well as the international community at large, to mobi\u00ad lize adequate resources to support and assist host States in maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum, in line with the principles of international solidarity, co\u00adoperation, burden and responsibility sharing; \\n (g) Calls upon UNHCR and the Department of Peacekeeping Operations of the United Nations Secretariat to enhance collaboration on all aspects of this complex matter, and as appropriate, to deploy, with the consent of host States, multi\u00addisciplinary assess\u00ad ment teams to an emerging crisis area in order to clarify the situation on the ground, evaluate security threats for refugee populations and consider appropriate practical responses; \\n (h) Calls upon UNHCR to explore how it may develop, in consultation with relevant part\u00ad ners, its own institutional capacity to address insecurity in refugee camps, inter alia by assisting States to ensure the physical safety and dignity of refugees, building, as appro\u00ad priate, upon its protection and operational expertise.", + "Paragraph": "The Executive Committee, \n\n Remaining seriously concerned by the continuing occurrence of military or armed attacks and other threats to the security of refugees, including the infiltration and presence of armed elements in refugee camps and settlements;17 \n\n Recalling the relevant provisions of international refugee law, international human rights law and international humanitarian law; \n\n Recalling its Conclusion No. 27 (XXXIII) and Conclusion No. 32 (XXXIV) on military attacks on refugee camps and settlements in Southern Africa and elsewhere; Conclusion 72 (XLIV) on personal security of refugees; Conclusion No. 48 (XXXVIII) on military or armed attacks on refugee camps and settlements; Conclusion No. 47 (XXXVIII) and Conclusion No. 84 (XLVII), on refugee children and adolescents, as well as Conclusion 64 (XLI) on refugee women and international protection; \n\n Recalling also United Nations Security Council resolution S\/RES\/1208 (1998) and S\/RES\/1296 (2000), and the two reports of the United Nations Secretary\u00adGeneral on the Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict18, noting in particular the recommendations made therein with respect to enhancing the security of refugee camps and settlements; \n\n Welcoming the discussion which took place on the civilian character of asylum in the context of the Global Consultations on International Protection;19 \n\n Noting that several international meetings have recently been held, aimed at identifying effective operational strategies for maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum;20 \n\n Reiterating that refugee camps and settlements should have an exclusively civilian and humanitarian character, that the grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act which should not be regarded as unfriendly by another State, as stated in the 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa and a number of EXCOM Conclusions, and that all actors, including refugees themselves, have the obligation to coop\u00ad erate in ensuring the peaceful and humanitarian character of refugee camps and settlements; \n\n Recognizing that the presence of armed elements in refugee camps or settlements; recruit\u00ad ment and training by government armed forces or organized armed groups; the use of such camps, intended to accommodate refugee populations on purely humanitarian grounds, for the internment of prisoners of war; as well as other forms of exploitation of refugee situations for the purpose of promoting military objectives are likely to expose refugees, par\u00ad ticularly women and children, to serious physical danger, inhibit the realization of durable solutions, in particular voluntary repatriation, but also local integration, jeopardize the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum and may threaten the national security of States, as well as inter\u00adState relations; \n\n Recognizing the special protection needs of refugee children and adolescents who, especially when living in camps where refugees are mixed with armed elements, are particularly vul\u00ad nerable to recruitment by government armed forces or organized armed groups; \n\n Reaffirming the importance of States, UNHCR and other relevant actors, integrating safety and security concerns from the outset of a refugee emergency into refugee camp manage\u00ad ment in a holistic manner; \n (a) Acknowledges that host States have the primary responsibility to ensure the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum by, inter alia, making all efforts to locate refugee camps and settlements at a reasonable distance from the border, maintaining law and order, curtailing the flow of arms into refugee camps and settlements, preventing their use for the internment of prisoners of war, as well as through the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation and internment of combatants; \n (b) Urges refugee\u00adhosting States to respect the civilian and humanitarian character of refu\u00ad gee camps by preventing their use for purposes which are incompatible with their civilian character; \n (c) Recommends that action taken by States to ensure respect for the civilian and humani\u00ad tarian character of asylum be guided, inter alia, by the following principles; \n (i) Respect for the right to seek asylum, and for the fundamental principle of non\u00ad refoulement, should be maintained at all times; \n (ii) Measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, sep\u00ad aration and internment of combatants should be taken as early as possible, preferably at the point of entry or at the first reception\/transit centres for new arrivals; \n (iii) To facilitate early identification and separation of combatants, registration of new arrivals should be conducted by means of a careful screening process; \n (iv) Refugee camps and settlements should benefit from adequate security arrange\u00ad ments to deter infiltration by armed elements and the strengthening of law and order; \n (v) Once identified, disarmed and separated from the refugee population, combat\u00ad ants should be interned at a safe location from the border; \n (vi) Where the granting of refugee status is based on group determination, civilian family members of combatants should be treated as refugees and should not be interned together with them; \n (vii) Combatants should not be considered as asylum\u00adseekers until the authorities have established within a reasonable timeframe that they have genuinely and permanently renounced military activities. Once this has been established, special procedures should be put in place for individual refugee status deter\u00ad mination, to ensure that those seeking asylum fulfil the criteria for the recogni\u00ad tion of refugee status. During the refugee status determination process, utmost attention should be paid to article 1F of the 1951 Convention, in order to avoid abuse of the asylum system by those who do not deserve international protection; \n (viii) Former child soldiers should benefit from special protection and assistance measures, in particular as regards their demobilization and rehabilitation; \n (ix) Where necessary, host States should develop, with assistance from UNHCR, operational guidelines in the context of group determination to exclude those individuals who are not deserving of international refugee protection; \n (d) Further to para 3 (b) above, calls upon UNHCR to convene a meeting of experts in sup\u00ad port of the elaboration of measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation, and internment of combatants, including the clarification of relevant procedures and standards, in consultation with States, United Nations Secre\u00ad tariat entities and agencies, and interested organizations, such as the ICRC, and report back to the Executive Committee on progress achieved; \n (e) Calls upon States to ensure that measures are taken to prevent the recruitment of refugees by government armed forces or organized armed groups, in particular of children, taking into account also that unaccompanied and separated children are even more vulner\u00ad able to recruitment than other children; \n (f) Calls upon the relevant United Nations organs and regional organizations, in pursuance of their respective mandates, as well as the international community at large, to mobi\u00ad lize adequate resources to support and assist host States in maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum, in line with the principles of international solidarity, co\u00adoperation, burden and responsibility sharing; \n (g) Calls upon UNHCR and the Department of Peacekeeping Operations of the United Nations Secretariat to enhance collaboration on all aspects of this complex matter, and as appropriate, to deploy, with the consent of host States, multi\u00addisciplinary assess\u00ad ment teams to an emerging crisis area in order to clarify the situation on the ground, evaluate security threats for refugee populations and consider appropriate practical responses; \n (h) Calls upon UNHCR to explore how it may develop, in consultation with relevant part\u00ad ners, its own institutional capacity to address insecurity in refugee camps, inter alia by assisting States to ensure the physical safety and dignity of refugees, building, as appro\u00ad priate, upon its protection and operational expertise.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167070,14 +167070,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "During the refugee status determination process, utmost attention should be paid to article 1F of the 1951 Convention, in order to avoid abuse of the asylum system by those who do not deserve international protection; \\n (viii) Former child soldiers should benefit from special protection and assistance measures, in particular as regards their demobilization and rehabilitation; \\n (ix) Where necessary, host States should develop, with assistance from UNHCR, operational guidelines in the context of group determination to exclude those individuals who are not deserving of international refugee protection; \\n (d) Further to para 3 (b) above, calls upon UNHCR to convene a meeting of experts in sup\u00ad port of the elaboration of measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation, and internment of combatants, including the clarification of relevant procedures and standards, in consultation with States, United Nations Secre\u00ad tariat entities and agencies, and interested organizations, such as the ICRC, and report back to the Executive Committee on progress achieved; \\n (e) Calls upon States to ensure that measures are taken to prevent the recruitment of refugees by government armed forces or organized armed groups, in particular of children, taking into account also that unaccompanied and separated children are even more vulner\u00ad able to recruitment than other children; \\n (f) Calls upon the relevant United Nations organs and regional organizations, in pursuance of their respective mandates, as well as the international community at large, to mobi\u00ad lize adequate resources to support and assist host States in maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum, in line with the principles of international solidarity, co\u00adoperation, burden and responsibility sharing; \\n (g) Calls upon UNHCR and the Department of Peacekeeping Operations of the United Nations Secretariat to enhance collaboration on all aspects of this complex matter, and as appropriate, to deploy, with the consent of host States, multi\u00addisciplinary assess\u00ad ment teams to an emerging crisis area in order to clarify the situation on the ground, evaluate security threats for refugee populations and consider appropriate practical responses; \\n (h) Calls upon UNHCR to explore how it may develop, in consultation with relevant part\u00ad ners, its own institutional capacity to address insecurity in refugee camps, inter alia by assisting States to ensure the physical safety and dignity of refugees, building, as appro\u00ad priate, upon its protection and operational expertise.", + "Sentence": "During the refugee status determination process, utmost attention should be paid to article 1F of the 1951 Convention, in order to avoid abuse of the asylum system by those who do not deserve international protection; \n (viii) Former child soldiers should benefit from special protection and assistance measures, in particular as regards their demobilization and rehabilitation; \n (ix) Where necessary, host States should develop, with assistance from UNHCR, operational guidelines in the context of group determination to exclude those individuals who are not deserving of international refugee protection; \n (d) Further to para 3 (b) above, calls upon UNHCR to convene a meeting of experts in sup\u00ad port of the elaboration of measures for the disarmament of armed elements and the identification, separation, and internment of combatants, including the clarification of relevant procedures and standards, in consultation with States, United Nations Secre\u00ad tariat entities and agencies, and interested organizations, such as the ICRC, and report back to the Executive Committee on progress achieved; \n (e) Calls upon States to ensure that measures are taken to prevent the recruitment of refugees by government armed forces or organized armed groups, in particular of children, taking into account also that unaccompanied and separated children are even more vulner\u00ad able to recruitment than other children; \n (f) Calls upon the relevant United Nations organs and regional organizations, in pursuance of their respective mandates, as well as the international community at large, to mobi\u00ad lize adequate resources to support and assist host States in maintaining the civilian and humanitarian character of asylum, in line with the principles of international solidarity, co\u00adoperation, burden and responsibility sharing; \n (g) Calls upon UNHCR and the Department of Peacekeeping Operations of the United Nations Secretariat to enhance collaboration on all aspects of this complex matter, and as appropriate, to deploy, with the consent of host States, multi\u00addisciplinary assess\u00ad ment teams to an emerging crisis area in order to clarify the situation on the ground, evaluate security threats for refugee populations and consider appropriate practical responses; \n (h) Calls upon UNHCR to explore how it may develop, in consultation with relevant part\u00ad ners, its own institutional capacity to address insecurity in refugee camps, inter alia by assisting States to ensure the physical safety and dignity of refugees, building, as appro\u00ad priate, upon its protection and operational expertise.", "newParagraph": "executive committee nn remaining seriously concerned continuing occurrence military armed attack threat security refugee including infiltration presence armed element refugee camp settlements17 nn recalling relevant provision international refugee law international human right law international humanitarian law nn recalling conclusion 27 xxxiii conclusion 32 xxxiv military attack refugee camp settlement southern africa elsewhere conclusion 72 xliv personal security refugee conclusion 48 xxxviii military armed attack refugee camp settlement conclusion 47 xxxviii conclusion 84 xlvii refugee child adolescent well conclusion 64 xli refugee woman international protection nn recalling also united nation security council resolution sres1208 1998 sres1296 2000 two report united nation secretary general protection civilian armed conflict18 noting particular recommendation made therein respect enhancing security refugee camp settlement nn welcoming discussion took place civilian character asylum context global consultation international protection19 nn noting several international meeting recently held aimed identifying effective operational strategy maintaining civilian humanitarian character asylum20 nn reiterating refugee camp settlement exclusively civilian humanitarian character grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act regarded unfriendly another state stated 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa number excom conclusion actor including refugee obligation coop erate ensuring peaceful humanitarian character refugee camp settlement nn recognizing presence armed element refugee camp settlement recruit ment training government armed force organized armed group use camp intended accommodate refugee population purely humanitarian ground internment prisoner war well form exploitation refugee situation purpose promoting military objective likely expose refugee par ticularly woman child serious physical danger inhibit realization durable solution particular voluntary repatriation also local integration jeopardize civilian humanitarian character asylum may threaten national security state well inter state relation nn recognizing special protection need refugee child adolescent especially living camp refugee mixed armed element particularly vul nerable recruitment government armed force organized armed group nn reaffirming importance state unhcr relevant actor integrating safety security concern outset refugee emergency refugee camp manage ment holistic manner n acknowledges host state primary responsibility ensure civilian humanitarian character asylum inter alia making effort locate refugee camp settlement reasonable distance border maintaining law order curtailing flow arm refugee camp settlement preventing use internment prisoner war well disarmament armed element identification separation internment combatant n b urge refugee hosting state respect civilian humanitarian character refu gee camp preventing use purpose incompatible civilian character n c recommends action taken state ensure respect civilian humani tarian character asylum guided inter alia following principle n respect right seek asylum fundamental principle non refoulement maintained time n ii measure disarmament armed element identification sep aration internment combatant taken early possible preferably point entry first receptiontransit centre new arrival n iii facilitate early identification separation combatant registration new arrival conducted mean careful screening process n iv refugee camp settlement benefit adequate security arrange ments deter infiltration armed element strengthening law order n v identified disarmed separated refugee population combat ant interned safe location border n vi granting refugee status based group determination civilian family member combatant treated refugee interned together n vii combatant considered asylum seeker authority established within reasonable timeframe genuinely permanently renounced military activity established special procedure put place individual refugee status deter mination ensure seeking asylum fulfil criterion recogni tion refugee status refugee status determination process utmost attention paid article 1f 1951 convention order avoid abuse asylum system deserve international protection n viii former child soldier benefit special protection assistance measure particular regard demobilization rehabilitation n ix necessary host state develop assistance unhcr operational guideline context group determination exclude individual deserving international refugee protection n para 3 b call upon unhcr convene meeting expert sup port elaboration measure disarmament armed element identification separation internment combatant including clarification relevant procedure standard consultation state united nation secre tariat entity agency interested organization icrc report back executive committee progress achieved n e call upon state ensure measure taken prevent recruitment refugee government armed force organized armed group particular child taking account also unaccompanied separated child even vulner able recruitment child n f call upon relevant united nation organ regional organization pursuance respective mandate well international community large mobi lize adequate resource support assist host state maintaining civilian humanitarian character asylum line principle international solidarity co operation burden responsibility sharing n g call upon unhcr department peacekeeping operation united nation secretariat enhance collaboration aspect complex matter appropriate deploy consent host state multi disciplinary ass ment team emerging crisis area order clarify situation ground evaluate security threat refugee population consider appropriate practical response n h call upon unhcr explore may develop consultation relevant part ners institutional capacity address insecurity refugee camp inter alia assisting state ensure physical safety dignity refugee building appro priate upon protection operational expertise", "ProcessedSent": "refugee status determination process utmost attention paid article 1f 1951 convention order avoid abuse asylum system deserve international protection n viii former child soldier benefit special protection assistance measure particular regard demobilization rehabilitation n ix necessary host state develop assistance unhcr operational guideline context group determination exclude individual deserving international refugee protection n para 3 b call upon unhcr convene meeting expert sup port elaboration measure disarmament armed element identification separation internment combatant including clarification relevant procedure standard consultation state united nation secre tariat entity agency interested organization icrc report back executive committee progress achieved n e call upon state ensure measure taken prevent recruitment refugee government armed force organized armed group particular child taking account also unaccompanied separated child even vulner able recruitment child n f call upon relevant united nation organ regional organization pursuance respective mandate well international community large mobi lize adequate resource support assist host state maintaining civilian humanitarian character asylum line principle international solidarity co operation burden responsibility sharing n g call upon unhcr department peacekeeping operation united nation secretariat enhance collaboration aspect complex matter appropriate deploy consent host state multi disciplinary ass ment team emerging crisis area order clarify situation ground evaluate security threat refugee population consider appropriate practical response n h call upon unhcr explore may develop consultation relevant part ners institutional capacity address insecurity refugee camp inter alia assisting state ensure physical safety dignity refugee building appro priate upon protection operational expertise", "SentID": 9281 }, { "ParagraphID": 2702, - "Paragraph": "Agreement between the Government of [country of origin] and the Government of [host country] for the voluntary repatriation and reintegration of combatants of [country of origin] \\n\\n Preamble \\n Combatants of [country of origin] have been identified in neighbouring countries. Approxi\u00ad mately [number] of these combatants are presently located in [host country]. This Agreement is the result of a series of consultations for the repatriation and incorporation in a disarma\u00ad ment, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) programme of these combatants between the Government of [country of origin] and the Government of [host country]. The Parties have agreed to facilitate the process of repatriating and reintegrating the combatants from [host country] to [country of origin] in conditions of safety and dignity. Accordingly, this Agree\u00ad ment outlines the obligations of the Parties.", + "Paragraph": "Agreement between the Government of [country of origin] and the Government of [host country] for the voluntary repatriation and reintegration of combatants of [country of origin] \n\n Preamble \n Combatants of [country of origin] have been identified in neighbouring countries. Approxi\u00ad mately [number] of these combatants are presently located in [host country]. This Agreement is the result of a series of consultations for the repatriation and incorporation in a disarma\u00ad ment, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) programme of these combatants between the Government of [country of origin] and the Government of [host country]. The Parties have agreed to facilitate the process of repatriating and reintegrating the combatants from [host country] to [country of origin] in conditions of safety and dignity. Accordingly, this Agree\u00ad ment outlines the obligations of the Parties.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167088,14 +167088,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Agreement between the Government of [country of origin] and the Government of [host country] for the voluntary repatriation and reintegration of combatants of [country of origin] \\n\\n Preamble \\n Combatants of [country of origin] have been identified in neighbouring countries.", + "Sentence": "Agreement between the Government of [country of origin] and the Government of [host country] for the voluntary repatriation and reintegration of combatants of [country of origin] \n\n Preamble \n Combatants of [country of origin] have been identified in neighbouring countries.", "newParagraph": "agreement government country origin government host country voluntary repatriation reintegration combatant country origin nn preamble n combatant country origin identified neighbouring country approxi mately number combatant presently located host country agreement result series consultation repatriation incorporation disarma ment demobilization reintegration ddr programme combatant government country origin government host country party agreed facilitate process repatriating reintegrating combatant host country country origin condition safety dignity accordingly agree ment outline obligation party", "ProcessedSent": "agreement government country origin government host country voluntary repatriation reintegration combatant country origin nn preamble n combatant country origin identified neighbouring country", "SentID": 9282 }, { "ParagraphID": 2702, - "Paragraph": "Agreement between the Government of [country of origin] and the Government of [host country] for the voluntary repatriation and reintegration of combatants of [country of origin] \\n\\n Preamble \\n Combatants of [country of origin] have been identified in neighbouring countries. Approxi\u00ad mately [number] of these combatants are presently located in [host country]. This Agreement is the result of a series of consultations for the repatriation and incorporation in a disarma\u00ad ment, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) programme of these combatants between the Government of [country of origin] and the Government of [host country]. The Parties have agreed to facilitate the process of repatriating and reintegrating the combatants from [host country] to [country of origin] in conditions of safety and dignity. Accordingly, this Agree\u00ad ment outlines the obligations of the Parties.", + "Paragraph": "Agreement between the Government of [country of origin] and the Government of [host country] for the voluntary repatriation and reintegration of combatants of [country of origin] \n\n Preamble \n Combatants of [country of origin] have been identified in neighbouring countries. Approxi\u00ad mately [number] of these combatants are presently located in [host country]. This Agreement is the result of a series of consultations for the repatriation and incorporation in a disarma\u00ad ment, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) programme of these combatants between the Government of [country of origin] and the Government of [host country]. The Parties have agreed to facilitate the process of repatriating and reintegrating the combatants from [host country] to [country of origin] in conditions of safety and dignity. Accordingly, this Agree\u00ad ment outlines the obligations of the Parties.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167113,7 +167113,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2702, - "Paragraph": "Agreement between the Government of [country of origin] and the Government of [host country] for the voluntary repatriation and reintegration of combatants of [country of origin] \\n\\n Preamble \\n Combatants of [country of origin] have been identified in neighbouring countries. Approxi\u00ad mately [number] of these combatants are presently located in [host country]. This Agreement is the result of a series of consultations for the repatriation and incorporation in a disarma\u00ad ment, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) programme of these combatants between the Government of [country of origin] and the Government of [host country]. The Parties have agreed to facilitate the process of repatriating and reintegrating the combatants from [host country] to [country of origin] in conditions of safety and dignity. Accordingly, this Agree\u00ad ment outlines the obligations of the Parties.", + "Paragraph": "Agreement between the Government of [country of origin] and the Government of [host country] for the voluntary repatriation and reintegration of combatants of [country of origin] \n\n Preamble \n Combatants of [country of origin] have been identified in neighbouring countries. Approxi\u00ad mately [number] of these combatants are presently located in [host country]. This Agreement is the result of a series of consultations for the repatriation and incorporation in a disarma\u00ad ment, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) programme of these combatants between the Government of [country of origin] and the Government of [host country]. The Parties have agreed to facilitate the process of repatriating and reintegrating the combatants from [host country] to [country of origin] in conditions of safety and dignity. Accordingly, this Agree\u00ad ment outlines the obligations of the Parties.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167131,7 +167131,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2702, - "Paragraph": "Agreement between the Government of [country of origin] and the Government of [host country] for the voluntary repatriation and reintegration of combatants of [country of origin] \\n\\n Preamble \\n Combatants of [country of origin] have been identified in neighbouring countries. Approxi\u00ad mately [number] of these combatants are presently located in [host country]. This Agreement is the result of a series of consultations for the repatriation and incorporation in a disarma\u00ad ment, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) programme of these combatants between the Government of [country of origin] and the Government of [host country]. The Parties have agreed to facilitate the process of repatriating and reintegrating the combatants from [host country] to [country of origin] in conditions of safety and dignity. Accordingly, this Agree\u00ad ment outlines the obligations of the Parties.", + "Paragraph": "Agreement between the Government of [country of origin] and the Government of [host country] for the voluntary repatriation and reintegration of combatants of [country of origin] \n\n Preamble \n Combatants of [country of origin] have been identified in neighbouring countries. Approxi\u00ad mately [number] of these combatants are presently located in [host country]. This Agreement is the result of a series of consultations for the repatriation and incorporation in a disarma\u00ad ment, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) programme of these combatants between the Government of [country of origin] and the Government of [host country]. The Parties have agreed to facilitate the process of repatriating and reintegrating the combatants from [host country] to [country of origin] in conditions of safety and dignity. Accordingly, this Agree\u00ad ment outlines the obligations of the Parties.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167149,7 +167149,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2702, - "Paragraph": "Agreement between the Government of [country of origin] and the Government of [host country] for the voluntary repatriation and reintegration of combatants of [country of origin] \\n\\n Preamble \\n Combatants of [country of origin] have been identified in neighbouring countries. Approxi\u00ad mately [number] of these combatants are presently located in [host country]. This Agreement is the result of a series of consultations for the repatriation and incorporation in a disarma\u00ad ment, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) programme of these combatants between the Government of [country of origin] and the Government of [host country]. The Parties have agreed to facilitate the process of repatriating and reintegrating the combatants from [host country] to [country of origin] in conditions of safety and dignity. Accordingly, this Agree\u00ad ment outlines the obligations of the Parties.", + "Paragraph": "Agreement between the Government of [country of origin] and the Government of [host country] for the voluntary repatriation and reintegration of combatants of [country of origin] \n\n Preamble \n Combatants of [country of origin] have been identified in neighbouring countries. Approxi\u00ad mately [number] of these combatants are presently located in [host country]. This Agreement is the result of a series of consultations for the repatriation and incorporation in a disarma\u00ad ment, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) programme of these combatants between the Government of [country of origin] and the Government of [host country]. The Parties have agreed to facilitate the process of repatriating and reintegrating the combatants from [host country] to [country of origin] in conditions of safety and dignity. Accordingly, this Agree\u00ad ment outlines the obligations of the Parties.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167167,7 +167167,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167178,14 +167178,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ].", + "Sentence": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ].", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence ", "SentID": 9287 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167196,14 +167196,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg", "SentID": 9288 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167214,14 +167214,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g.", + "Sentence": "foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg", "SentID": 9289 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167232,14 +167232,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i.", + "Sentence": "UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n", "SentID": 9290 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167257,7 +167257,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167268,14 +167268,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n ii.", + "Sentence": "\n ii.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "n ii", "SentID": 9292 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167293,7 +167293,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167304,14 +167304,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n iii.", + "Sentence": "\n iii.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "n iii", "SentID": 9294 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167329,7 +167329,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167340,14 +167340,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n iv.", + "Sentence": "\n iv.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "n iv", "SentID": 9296 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167365,7 +167365,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167376,14 +167376,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members.", + "Sentence": "\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member", "SentID": 9298 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167394,14 +167394,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n vi.", + "Sentence": "\n vi.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "n vi", "SentID": 9299 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167419,7 +167419,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167430,14 +167430,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n vii.", + "Sentence": "\n vii.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "n vii", "SentID": 9301 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167455,7 +167455,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167466,14 +167466,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n viii.", + "Sentence": "\n viii.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "n viii", "SentID": 9303 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167491,7 +167491,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167502,14 +167502,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n ix.", + "Sentence": "\n ix.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "n ix", "SentID": 9305 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167527,7 +167527,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167545,7 +167545,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167556,14 +167556,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n x.", + "Sentence": "\n x.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "n x", "SentID": 9308 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167581,7 +167581,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167592,14 +167592,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n", "SentID": 9310 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167617,7 +167617,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167628,14 +167628,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n ii.", + "Sentence": "\n ii.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "n ii", "SentID": 9312 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167653,7 +167653,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167664,14 +167664,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n iii.", + "Sentence": "\n iii.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "n iii", "SentID": 9314 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167689,7 +167689,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167700,14 +167700,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n iv.", + "Sentence": "\n iv.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "n iv", "SentID": 9316 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167725,7 +167725,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167736,14 +167736,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution.", + "Sentence": "\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution", "SentID": 9318 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167754,14 +167754,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child", "SentID": 9319 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167772,14 +167772,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process", "SentID": 9320 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167790,14 +167790,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion", "SentID": 9321 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167808,14 +167808,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination", "SentID": 9322 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167826,14 +167826,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country].", + "Sentence": "\n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country].", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country", "SentID": 9323 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167851,7 +167851,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167862,14 +167862,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement", "SentID": 9325 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167887,7 +167887,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167898,14 +167898,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n", "SentID": 9327 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167923,7 +167923,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167934,14 +167934,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n ii.", + "Sentence": "\n ii.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "n ii", "SentID": 9329 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167959,7 +167959,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167970,14 +167970,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n iii.", + "Sentence": "\n iii.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "n iii", "SentID": 9331 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -167995,7 +167995,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168006,14 +168006,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement", "SentID": 9333 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168024,14 +168024,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party", "SentID": 9334 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168042,14 +168042,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants.", + "Sentence": "\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant", "SentID": 9335 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168060,14 +168060,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party", "SentID": 9336 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168078,14 +168078,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party", "SentID": 9337 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168096,14 +168096,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party", "SentID": 9338 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168114,14 +168114,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party", "SentID": 9339 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168132,14 +168132,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party", "SentID": 9340 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168150,14 +168150,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement.", + "Sentence": "\n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement", "SentID": 9341 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168168,14 +168168,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals.", + "Sentence": "\n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals.", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "nn done day two original", "SentID": 9342 }, { "ParagraphID": 2703, - "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \\n\\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \\n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \\n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \\n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \\n\\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \\n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \\n\\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \\n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \\n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \\n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \\n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \\n\\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \\n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \\n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \\n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \\n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \\n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \\n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \\n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \\n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \\n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \\n\\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \\n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \\n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \\n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \\n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \\n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \\n\\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \\n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \\n\\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \\n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \\n\\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \\n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \\n\\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \\n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \\n\\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \\n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \\n\\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \\n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \\n\\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \\n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \\n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \\n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \\n\\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \\n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \\n\\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \\n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \\n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \\n\\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \\n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \\n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \\n\\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \\n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \\n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \\n\\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \\n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \\n\\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \\n\\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Paragraph": "Article 1 \u2013 Definitions \n\n Article 2 \u2013 Legal bases \n The Parties to this Agreement are mindful of the legal bases for the [internment and] repatri\u00ad ation of the said combatants and base their intentions and obligations on the following inter\u00ad national instruments: \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907 (Annex 1) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Third Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949 (Annex 2) \n [If applicable, in cases involving internment] The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non\u00adInter\u00ad national Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), Geneva, 12 December 1977 (Annex 3) \n Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva, 28 July 1951 (Annex 4) \n [If applicable, in cases involving African States] The 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (Annex 5) \n\n Article 3 \u2013 Commencement \n The repatriation of the said combatants will commence on [ ]. \n\n Article 4 \u2013 Technical Task Force \n A Technical Task Force of representatives of the following parties to determine the opera\u00ad tional framework for the repatriation and reintegration of the said combatants shall be constituted: \n National Commission on DDR [of country of origin and of host country] Representatives of the embassies [of country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant government departments of country of origin and host country, e.g. foreign affairs, defence, internal affairs, immigration, refugee\/humanitarian affairs, children and women\/gender] \n UN Missions [in country of origin and host country] \n [Relevant international agencies, e.g. UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, IOM] \n\n Article 5 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [country of origin] The Government of [country of origin] agrees: \n i. To accept the return in safety and dignity of the said combatants. \n ii. To provide sufficient information to the said combatants, as well as to their family members, to make free and informed decisions concerning their repatriation and rein\u00ad tegration. \n iii. To include the returning combatants in the amnesty provided for in article [ ] of the Peace Accord (Annex 6). \n iv. To waive any court martial action for desertion from government forces. \n v. To facilitate the return of the said combatants to their places of origin or choice through [relevant government agencies such as the National Commission on DDR and inter\u00ad national agencies and NGO partners], taking into account the specific needs and circum\u00ad stances of the said combatants and their family members. \n vi. To consider and facilitate the payment of any DDR benefits, including reintegration assistance, upon the return of the said combatants and to provide appropriate identi\u00ad fication papers in accordance with the eligibility criteria of the DDR programme. \n vii. To assist the returning combatants of government forces who wish to benefit from the restructuring of the army by rejoining the army or obtaining retirement benefits, depend\u00ad ing on their choice and if they meet the criteria for the above purposes. \n viii. To facilitate through the immigration department the entry of spouses, partners, children and other family members of the combatants who may not be citizens of [country of origin] and to regularize their residence in [country of origin] in accordance with the provisions of its immigration or other relevant laws. \n ix. To grant free and unhindered access to [UN Missions, relevant international agencies, etc.] to monitor the treatment of returning combatants and their family members in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implemen\u00ad tation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n x. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation and reintegration of the combatants. \n\n Article 6 \u2013 Obligations of Government of [host country] The Government of [host country] agrees: \n i. To facilitate the processing of repatriation of the said combatants who wish to return to [country of origin]. \n ii. To return the personal effects (excluding arms and ammunition) of the said combatants. \n iii. To provide clear documentation and records which account for arms and ammunition collected from the said combatants. \n iv. To meet the [applicable] cost of repatriation of the said combatants. \n v. To consider local integration for any of the said combatants for whom this is assessed to be the most appropriate durable solution. \n\n Article 7 \u2013 Children associated with armed forces and groups \n The return, family reunification and reintegration of children associated with armed forces and groups will be carried out under separate arrangements, taking into account the special needs of the children. \n\n Article 8 \u2013 Special measures for vulnerable persons\/persons with special needs \n The Parties shall take special measures to ensure that vulnerable persons and those with special needs, such as disabled combatants or those with other medical conditions that affect their travel, receive adequate protection, assistance and care throughout the repatri\u00ad ation and reintegration processes. \n\n Article 9 \u2013 Families of combatants \n Wherever possible, the Parties shall ensure that the families of the said combatants residing in [host country] return to [country of origin] in a coordinated manner that allows for the maintenance of family links and reunion. \n\n Article 10 \u2013 Nationality issues \n The Parties shall mutually resolve through the Technical Task Force any applicable nation\u00ad ality issues, including establishment of modalities for ascertaining nationality, and deter\u00ad mining the country in which combatants will benefit from a DDR programme and the country of eventual destination. \n\n Article 11 \u2013 Asylum \n Should any of the said combatants, having permanently renounced armed activities, not wish to repatriate for reasons relevant to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, they shall have the right to seek and enjoy asylum in [host country]. The grant of asylum is a peaceful and humanitarian act and shall not be regarded as an unfriendly act. \n\n Article 12 \u2013 Designated border crossing points \n The Parties shall agree on border crossing points for repatriation movements. Such agree\u00ad ment may be modified to better suit operational requirements. \n\n Article 13 \u2013 Immigration, customs and health formalities \n i. To ensure the expeditious return of the said combatants, their family members and belongings, the Parties shall waive their respective immigration, customs and health formalities usually carried out at border crossing points. \n ii. The personal or communal property of the said combatants and their family members, including livestock and pets, shall be exempted from all customs duties, charges and tariffs. \n iii. [If applicable] The Parties shall also waive any fees, passenger service charges as well as all other airport, marine, road or other taxes for vehicles entering or transiting their respective territories under the auspices of [repatriation agency] for the repatriation operation. \n\n Article 14 \u2013 Access and monitoring upon return \n [The UN Mission and other relevant international and non\u00adgovernmental agencies] shall be granted free and unhindered access to all the said combatants and their family members in [the host country] and upon return in [the country of origin], in order to monitor their treatment in accordance with human rights and humanitarian standards, including the implementation of commitments contained in this Agreement. \n\n Article 15 \u2013 Continued validity of other agreements \n This Agreement shall not affect the validity of any existing agreements, arrangements or mechanisms of cooperation between the Parties. \n To the extent necessary or applicable, such agreements, arrangements or mechanisms may be relied upon and applied as if they formed part of this Agreement to assist in the pursuit of this Agreement, namely the repa\u00ad triation and reintegration of the said combatants. \n\n Article 16 \u2013 Resolution of disputes \n Any question arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or for which no provision is expressly made herein, shall be resolved amicably through consultations between the Parties. \n\n Article 17 \u2013 Entry into force \n This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by the Parties. \n\n Article 18 \u2013 Amendment \n This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in writing between the Parties. \n\n Article 19 \u2013 Termination \n This Agreement shall remain in force until it is terminated by mutual agreement between the Parties. \n\n Article 20 \u2013 Succession \n This Agreement binds any successors of both Parties. \n\n In witness whereof, the authorized representatives of the Parties have hereby signed this Agreement. \n\n DONE at ..........................., this..... day of..... , in two originals. \n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168186,14 +168186,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", + "Sentence": "\n\n For the Government of [country of origin]: For the Government of [host country]:", "newParagraph": "article 1 definition nn article 2 legal base n party agreement mindful legal base internment repatri ation said combatant base intention obligation following inter national instrument n applicable case involving internment hague convention v respecting right duty neutral power person case war land 18 october 1907 annex 1 n applicable case involving internment third geneva convention relative treatment prisoner war geneva 12 august 1949 annex 2 n applicable case involving internment protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim non inter national armed conflict protocol ii geneva 12 december 1977 annex 3 n article 33 1951 convention relating status refugee geneva 28 july 1951 annex 4 n applicable case involving african state 1969 oau convention governing specific aspect refugee problem africa annex 5 nn article 3 commencement n repatriation said combatant commence nn article 4 technical task force n technical task force representative following party determine opera tional framework repatriation reintegration said combatant shall constituted n national commission ddr country origin host country representative embassy country origin host country n relevant government department country origin host country eg foreign affair defence internal affair immigration refugeehumanitarian affair child womengender n un mission country origin host country n relevant international agency eg unhcr unicef icrc iom nn article 5 obligation government country origin government country origin agrees n accept return safety dignity said combatant n ii provide sufficient information said combatant well family member make free informed decision concerning repatriation rein tegration n iii include returning combatant amnesty provided article peace accord annex 6 n iv waive court martial action desertion government force n v facilitate return said combatant place origin choice relevant government agency national commission ddr inter national agency ngo partner taking account specific need circum stance said combatant family member n vi consider facilitate payment ddr benefit including reintegration assistance upon return said combatant provide appropriate identi fication paper accordance eligibility criterion ddr programme n vii assist returning combatant government force wish benefit restructuring army rejoining army obtaining retirement benefit depend ing choice meet criterion purpose n viii facilitate immigration department entry spouse partner child family member combatant may citizen country origin regularize residence country origin accordance provision immigration relevant law n ix grant free unhindered access un mission relevant international agency etc monitor treatment returning combatant family member accordance human right humanitarian standard including implemen tation commitment contained agreement n x meet applicable cost repatriation reintegration combatant nn article 6 obligation government host country government host country agrees n facilitate processing repatriation said combatant wish return country origin n ii return personal effect excluding arm ammunition said combatant n iii provide clear documentation record account arm ammunition collected said combatant n iv meet applicable cost repatriation said combatant n v consider local integration said combatant assessed appropriate durable solution nn article 7 child associated armed force group n return family reunification reintegration child associated armed force group carried separate arrangement taking account special need child nn article 8 special measure vulnerable personspersons special need n party shall take special measure ensure vulnerable person special need disabled combatant medical condition affect travel receive adequate protection assistance care throughout repatri ation reintegration process nn article 9 family combatant n wherever possible party shall ensure family said combatant residing host country return country origin coordinated manner allows maintenance family link reunion nn article 10 nationality issue n party shall mutually resolve technical task force applicable nation ality issue including establishment modality ascertaining nationality deter mining country combatant benefit ddr programme country eventual destination nn article 11 asylum n said combatant permanently renounced armed activity wish repatriate reason relevant 1951 convention relating status refugee shall right seek enjoy asylum host country grant asylum peaceful humanitarian act shall regarded unfriendly act nn article 12 designated border crossing point n party shall agree border crossing point repatriation movement agree ment may modified better suit operational requirement nn article 13 immigration custom health formality n ensure expeditious return said combatant family member belonging party shall waive respective immigration custom health formality usually carried border crossing point n ii personal communal property said combatant family member including livestock pet shall exempted custom duty charge tariff n iii applicable party shall also waive fee passenger service charge well airport marine road tax vehicle entering transiting respective territory auspex repatriation agency repatriation operation nn article 14 access monitoring upon return n un mission relevant international non governmental agency shall granted free unhindered access said combatant family member host country upon return country origin order monitor treatment accordance human right humanitarian standard including implementation commitment contained agreement nn article 15 continued validity agreement n agreement shall affect validity existing agreement arrangement mechanism cooperation party n extent necessary applicable agreement arrangement mechanism may relied upon applied formed part agreement assist pursuit agreement namely repa triation reintegration said combatant nn article 16 resolution dispute n question arising interpretation application agreement provision expressly made herein shall resolved amicably consultation party nn article 17 entry force n agreement shall enter force upon signature party nn article 18 amendment n agreement may amended mutual agreement writing party nn article 19 termination n agreement shall remain force terminated mutual agreement party nn article 20 succession n agreement bind successor party nn witness whereof authorized representative party hereby signed agreement nn done day two original nn government country origin government host country", "ProcessedSent": "nn government country origin government host country", "SentID": 9343 }, { "ParagraphID": 2704, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \\n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \\n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \\n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \\n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \\n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \\n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \\n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \\n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \\n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \\n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \\n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \\n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \\n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \\n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \\n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \\n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \\n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \\n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \\n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168204,14 +168204,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp.", + "Sentence": "\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp.", "newParagraph": "n 1 see example special report secretary general united nation organization mission democratic republic congo s20021005 10 september 2002 section principle involved disarmament demobilization repatriation resettlement reintegration foreign armed group pp 6 7 report secretary general security council liberia 11 september 2003 para 49 planned disarmament demobilization reintegration process liberia suc ceed subregional approach take account presence foreign combatant liberia liberian ex combatant neighbouring country would essential view subre gional dimension conflict disarmament demobilization reintegration programme liberia linked extent possible ongoing disarmament demobilization rein tegration process c\u00f4te ivoire security council resolution 1509 2003 establishing united nation mission liberia para 1f ddr addressing inclusion non liberian combatant security council press release security council call regional approach west africa address cross border issue child soldier mercenary small arm sc8037 25 march 2004 n 2 every state duty refrain organizing encouraging organization irregular force armed band including mercenary incursion territory another state every state duty refrain organizing instigating assisting participating act civil strife terrorist act another state acquiescing organized activity within territory directed towards commission act act referred present paragraph involve threat use force state shall organize assist foment finance incite tolerate subversive terrorist armed activity directed towards violent overthrow regime another state interfere civil strife another state n 3 adopted un general assembly resolution 43173 9 december 1988 n 4 adopted first un congress prevention crime treatment offender geneva 1955 approved un economic social council resolution 663 c xxiv 31 july 1957 2076 lxii 13 may 1977 n 5 adopted un general assembly resolution 45111 14 december 1990 n 6 un general assembly resolution 56166 human right mass exodus para 8 26 february 2002 see also general assembly resolution 58169 para 7 n 7 un general assembly resolution 58169 human right mass exodus 9 march 2004 n 8 un general assembly report fifty fifth session executive committee high commissioner programme aac961003 12 october 2004 n 9 information separation internment combatant section 7 10 draw significantly paper presented expert roundtable organized unhcr civilian humanitar ian character asylum june 2004 particular background resource paper prepared conference maintaining civilian humanitarian character asylum rosa da costa unhcr legal protection policy research series department international protection ppla200402 june 2004 well subsequent unhcr draft operational guideline maintaining civilian character asylum mass refugee influx situation n 10 internment camp foreign combatant established sierra leone mapeh mafanta camp combatant liberian war democratic republic congo drc zongo combatant central african republic zambia ukwimi camp combatant angola burundi rwanda drc tanzania mwisa separation facility combatant burundi drc n 11 da costa op cit n 12 full definition 1989 international convention recruitment use financing training mercenary contained glossary term annex africa 1977 convention oau elimination mercenarism africa also applicable n 13 universal declaration human right art 14 article contains exception case prose cutions genuinely arising non political crime act contrary purpose principle united nation n 14 information see unhcr handbook repatriation reintegration activity geneva may 2004 n 15 un general assembly emphasized obligation state accept return national called upon state facilitate return national determined need international protection affirmed need return person undertaken safe humane manner full respect human right dignity irrespective status person concerned un general assembly resolution 57187 para 11 18 december 2002 n 16 refer unhcrdpko note cooperation 2004 n 17 purpose conclusion term armed element used generic term refugee context refers combatant well civilian carrying weapon similarly purpose conclusion term combatant cover person taking active part hostility inter national non international armed conflict entered country asylum n 18 s1999957 s2001331 n 19 ecgc018rev1 n 20 workshop potential role international police refugee camp security ottawa canada march 2001 regional symposium maintaining civilian humanitarian character refugee status camp location pretoria south africa february 2001 international seminar exploring role military refugee camp security oxford uk july 2001", "ProcessedSent": "n 1 see example special report secretary general united nation organization mission democratic republic congo s20021005 10 september 2002 section principle involved disarmament demobilization repatriation resettlement reintegration foreign armed group pp", "SentID": 9344 }, { "ParagraphID": 2704, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \\n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \\n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \\n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \\n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \\n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \\n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \\n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \\n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \\n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \\n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \\n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \\n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \\n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \\n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \\n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \\n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \\n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \\n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \\n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168229,7 +168229,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2704, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \\n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \\n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \\n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \\n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \\n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \\n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \\n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \\n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \\n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \\n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \\n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \\n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \\n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \\n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \\n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \\n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \\n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \\n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \\n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168247,7 +168247,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2704, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \\n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \\n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \\n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \\n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \\n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \\n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \\n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \\n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \\n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \\n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \\n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \\n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \\n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \\n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \\n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \\n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \\n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \\n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \\n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168265,7 +168265,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2704, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \\n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \\n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \\n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \\n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \\n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \\n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \\n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \\n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \\n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \\n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \\n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \\n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \\n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \\n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \\n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \\n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \\n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \\n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \\n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168276,14 +168276,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \\n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988.", + "Sentence": "\n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988.", "newParagraph": "n 1 see example special report secretary general united nation organization mission democratic republic congo s20021005 10 september 2002 section principle involved disarmament demobilization repatriation resettlement reintegration foreign armed group pp 6 7 report secretary general security council liberia 11 september 2003 para 49 planned disarmament demobilization reintegration process liberia suc ceed subregional approach take account presence foreign combatant liberia liberian ex combatant neighbouring country would essential view subre gional dimension conflict disarmament demobilization reintegration programme liberia linked extent possible ongoing disarmament demobilization rein tegration process c\u00f4te ivoire security council resolution 1509 2003 establishing united nation mission liberia para 1f ddr addressing inclusion non liberian combatant security council press release security council call regional approach west africa address cross border issue child soldier mercenary small arm sc8037 25 march 2004 n 2 every state duty refrain organizing encouraging organization irregular force armed band including mercenary incursion territory another state every state duty refrain organizing instigating assisting participating act civil strife terrorist act another state acquiescing organized activity within territory directed towards commission act act referred present paragraph involve threat use force state shall organize assist foment finance incite tolerate subversive terrorist armed activity directed towards violent overthrow regime another state interfere civil strife another state n 3 adopted un general assembly resolution 43173 9 december 1988 n 4 adopted first un congress prevention crime treatment offender geneva 1955 approved un economic social council resolution 663 c xxiv 31 july 1957 2076 lxii 13 may 1977 n 5 adopted un general assembly resolution 45111 14 december 1990 n 6 un general assembly resolution 56166 human right mass exodus para 8 26 february 2002 see also general assembly resolution 58169 para 7 n 7 un general assembly resolution 58169 human right mass exodus 9 march 2004 n 8 un general assembly report fifty fifth session executive committee high commissioner programme aac961003 12 october 2004 n 9 information separation internment combatant section 7 10 draw significantly paper presented expert roundtable organized unhcr civilian humanitar ian character asylum june 2004 particular background resource paper prepared conference maintaining civilian humanitarian character asylum rosa da costa unhcr legal protection policy research series department international protection ppla200402 june 2004 well subsequent unhcr draft operational guideline maintaining civilian character asylum mass refugee influx situation n 10 internment camp foreign combatant established sierra leone mapeh mafanta camp combatant liberian war democratic republic congo drc zongo combatant central african republic zambia ukwimi camp combatant angola burundi rwanda drc tanzania mwisa separation facility combatant burundi drc n 11 da costa op cit n 12 full definition 1989 international convention recruitment use financing training mercenary contained glossary term annex africa 1977 convention oau elimination mercenarism africa also applicable n 13 universal declaration human right art 14 article contains exception case prose cutions genuinely arising non political crime act contrary purpose principle united nation n 14 information see unhcr handbook repatriation reintegration activity geneva may 2004 n 15 un general assembly emphasized obligation state accept return national called upon state facilitate return national determined need international protection affirmed need return person undertaken safe humane manner full respect human right dignity irrespective status person concerned un general assembly resolution 57187 para 11 18 december 2002 n 16 refer unhcrdpko note cooperation 2004 n 17 purpose conclusion term armed element used generic term refugee context refers combatant well civilian carrying weapon similarly purpose conclusion term combatant cover person taking active part hostility inter national non international armed conflict entered country asylum n 18 s1999957 s2001331 n 19 ecgc018rev1 n 20 workshop potential role international police refugee camp security ottawa canada march 2001 regional symposium maintaining civilian humanitarian character refugee status camp location pretoria south africa february 2001 international seminar exploring role military refugee camp security oxford uk july 2001", "ProcessedSent": "n 2 every state duty refrain organizing encouraging organization irregular force armed band including mercenary incursion territory another state every state duty refrain organizing instigating assisting participating act civil strife terrorist act another state acquiescing organized activity within territory directed towards commission act act referred present paragraph involve threat use force state shall organize assist foment finance incite tolerate subversive terrorist armed activity directed towards violent overthrow regime another state interfere civil strife another state n 3 adopted un general assembly resolution 43173 9 december 1988", "SentID": 9348 }, { "ParagraphID": 2704, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \\n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \\n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \\n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \\n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \\n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \\n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \\n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \\n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \\n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \\n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \\n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \\n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \\n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \\n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \\n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \\n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \\n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \\n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \\n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168294,14 +168294,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977.", + "Sentence": "\n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977.", "newParagraph": "n 1 see example special report secretary general united nation organization mission democratic republic congo s20021005 10 september 2002 section principle involved disarmament demobilization repatriation resettlement reintegration foreign armed group pp 6 7 report secretary general security council liberia 11 september 2003 para 49 planned disarmament demobilization reintegration process liberia suc ceed subregional approach take account presence foreign combatant liberia liberian ex combatant neighbouring country would essential view subre gional dimension conflict disarmament demobilization reintegration programme liberia linked extent possible ongoing disarmament demobilization rein tegration process c\u00f4te ivoire security council resolution 1509 2003 establishing united nation mission liberia para 1f ddr addressing inclusion non liberian combatant security council press release security council call regional approach west africa address cross border issue child soldier mercenary small arm sc8037 25 march 2004 n 2 every state duty refrain organizing encouraging organization irregular force armed band including mercenary incursion territory another state every state duty refrain organizing instigating assisting participating act civil strife terrorist act another state acquiescing organized activity within territory directed towards commission act act referred present paragraph involve threat use force state shall organize assist foment finance incite tolerate subversive terrorist armed activity directed towards violent overthrow regime another state interfere civil strife another state n 3 adopted un general assembly resolution 43173 9 december 1988 n 4 adopted first un congress prevention crime treatment offender geneva 1955 approved un economic social council resolution 663 c xxiv 31 july 1957 2076 lxii 13 may 1977 n 5 adopted un general assembly resolution 45111 14 december 1990 n 6 un general assembly resolution 56166 human right mass exodus para 8 26 february 2002 see also general assembly resolution 58169 para 7 n 7 un general assembly resolution 58169 human right mass exodus 9 march 2004 n 8 un general assembly report fifty fifth session executive committee high commissioner programme aac961003 12 october 2004 n 9 information separation internment combatant section 7 10 draw significantly paper presented expert roundtable organized unhcr civilian humanitar ian character asylum june 2004 particular background resource paper prepared conference maintaining civilian humanitarian character asylum rosa da costa unhcr legal protection policy research series department international protection ppla200402 june 2004 well subsequent unhcr draft operational guideline maintaining civilian character asylum mass refugee influx situation n 10 internment camp foreign combatant established sierra leone mapeh mafanta camp combatant liberian war democratic republic congo drc zongo combatant central african republic zambia ukwimi camp combatant angola burundi rwanda drc tanzania mwisa separation facility combatant burundi drc n 11 da costa op cit n 12 full definition 1989 international convention recruitment use financing training mercenary contained glossary term annex africa 1977 convention oau elimination mercenarism africa also applicable n 13 universal declaration human right art 14 article contains exception case prose cutions genuinely arising non political crime act contrary purpose principle united nation n 14 information see unhcr handbook repatriation reintegration activity geneva may 2004 n 15 un general assembly emphasized obligation state accept return national called upon state facilitate return national determined need international protection affirmed need return person undertaken safe humane manner full respect human right dignity irrespective status person concerned un general assembly resolution 57187 para 11 18 december 2002 n 16 refer unhcrdpko note cooperation 2004 n 17 purpose conclusion term armed element used generic term refugee context refers combatant well civilian carrying weapon similarly purpose conclusion term combatant cover person taking active part hostility inter national non international armed conflict entered country asylum n 18 s1999957 s2001331 n 19 ecgc018rev1 n 20 workshop potential role international police refugee camp security ottawa canada march 2001 regional symposium maintaining civilian humanitarian character refugee status camp location pretoria south africa february 2001 international seminar exploring role military refugee camp security oxford uk july 2001", "ProcessedSent": "n 4 adopted first un congress prevention crime treatment offender geneva 1955 approved un economic social council resolution 663 c xxiv 31 july 1957 2076 lxii 13 may 1977", "SentID": 9349 }, { "ParagraphID": 2704, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \\n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \\n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \\n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \\n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \\n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \\n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \\n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \\n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \\n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \\n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \\n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \\n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \\n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \\n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \\n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \\n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \\n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \\n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \\n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168312,14 +168312,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990.", + "Sentence": "\n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990.", "newParagraph": "n 1 see example special report secretary general united nation organization mission democratic republic congo s20021005 10 september 2002 section principle involved disarmament demobilization repatriation resettlement reintegration foreign armed group pp 6 7 report secretary general security council liberia 11 september 2003 para 49 planned disarmament demobilization reintegration process liberia suc ceed subregional approach take account presence foreign combatant liberia liberian ex combatant neighbouring country would essential view subre gional dimension conflict disarmament demobilization reintegration programme liberia linked extent possible ongoing disarmament demobilization rein tegration process c\u00f4te ivoire security council resolution 1509 2003 establishing united nation mission liberia para 1f ddr addressing inclusion non liberian combatant security council press release security council call regional approach west africa address cross border issue child soldier mercenary small arm sc8037 25 march 2004 n 2 every state duty refrain organizing encouraging organization irregular force armed band including mercenary incursion territory another state every state duty refrain organizing instigating assisting participating act civil strife terrorist act another state acquiescing organized activity within territory directed towards commission act act referred present paragraph involve threat use force state shall organize assist foment finance incite tolerate subversive terrorist armed activity directed towards violent overthrow regime another state interfere civil strife another state n 3 adopted un general assembly resolution 43173 9 december 1988 n 4 adopted first un congress prevention crime treatment offender geneva 1955 approved un economic social council resolution 663 c xxiv 31 july 1957 2076 lxii 13 may 1977 n 5 adopted un general assembly resolution 45111 14 december 1990 n 6 un general assembly resolution 56166 human right mass exodus para 8 26 february 2002 see also general assembly resolution 58169 para 7 n 7 un general assembly resolution 58169 human right mass exodus 9 march 2004 n 8 un general assembly report fifty fifth session executive committee high commissioner programme aac961003 12 october 2004 n 9 information separation internment combatant section 7 10 draw significantly paper presented expert roundtable organized unhcr civilian humanitar ian character asylum june 2004 particular background resource paper prepared conference maintaining civilian humanitarian character asylum rosa da costa unhcr legal protection policy research series department international protection ppla200402 june 2004 well subsequent unhcr draft operational guideline maintaining civilian character asylum mass refugee influx situation n 10 internment camp foreign combatant established sierra leone mapeh mafanta camp combatant liberian war democratic republic congo drc zongo combatant central african republic zambia ukwimi camp combatant angola burundi rwanda drc tanzania mwisa separation facility combatant burundi drc n 11 da costa op cit n 12 full definition 1989 international convention recruitment use financing training mercenary contained glossary term annex africa 1977 convention oau elimination mercenarism africa also applicable n 13 universal declaration human right art 14 article contains exception case prose cutions genuinely arising non political crime act contrary purpose principle united nation n 14 information see unhcr handbook repatriation reintegration activity geneva may 2004 n 15 un general assembly emphasized obligation state accept return national called upon state facilitate return national determined need international protection affirmed need return person undertaken safe humane manner full respect human right dignity irrespective status person concerned un general assembly resolution 57187 para 11 18 december 2002 n 16 refer unhcrdpko note cooperation 2004 n 17 purpose conclusion term armed element used generic term refugee context refers combatant well civilian carrying weapon similarly purpose conclusion term combatant cover person taking active part hostility inter national non international armed conflict entered country asylum n 18 s1999957 s2001331 n 19 ecgc018rev1 n 20 workshop potential role international police refugee camp security ottawa canada march 2001 regional symposium maintaining civilian humanitarian character refugee status camp location pretoria south africa february 2001 international seminar exploring role military refugee camp security oxford uk july 2001", "ProcessedSent": "n 5 adopted un general assembly resolution 45111 14 december 1990", "SentID": 9350 }, { "ParagraphID": 2704, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \\n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \\n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \\n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \\n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \\n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \\n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \\n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \\n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \\n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \\n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \\n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \\n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \\n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \\n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \\n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \\n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \\n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \\n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \\n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168330,14 +168330,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para.", + "Sentence": "\n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para.", "newParagraph": "n 1 see example special report secretary general united nation organization mission democratic republic congo s20021005 10 september 2002 section principle involved disarmament demobilization repatriation resettlement reintegration foreign armed group pp 6 7 report secretary general security council liberia 11 september 2003 para 49 planned disarmament demobilization reintegration process liberia suc ceed subregional approach take account presence foreign combatant liberia liberian ex combatant neighbouring country would essential view subre gional dimension conflict disarmament demobilization reintegration programme liberia linked extent possible ongoing disarmament demobilization rein tegration process c\u00f4te ivoire security council resolution 1509 2003 establishing united nation mission liberia para 1f ddr addressing inclusion non liberian combatant security council press release security council call regional approach west africa address cross border issue child soldier mercenary small arm sc8037 25 march 2004 n 2 every state duty refrain organizing encouraging organization irregular force armed band including mercenary incursion territory another state every state duty refrain organizing instigating assisting participating act civil strife terrorist act another state acquiescing organized activity within territory directed towards commission act act referred present paragraph involve threat use force state shall organize assist foment finance incite tolerate subversive terrorist armed activity directed towards violent overthrow regime another state interfere civil strife another state n 3 adopted un general assembly resolution 43173 9 december 1988 n 4 adopted first un congress prevention crime treatment offender geneva 1955 approved un economic social council resolution 663 c xxiv 31 july 1957 2076 lxii 13 may 1977 n 5 adopted un general assembly resolution 45111 14 december 1990 n 6 un general assembly resolution 56166 human right mass exodus para 8 26 february 2002 see also general assembly resolution 58169 para 7 n 7 un general assembly resolution 58169 human right mass exodus 9 march 2004 n 8 un general assembly report fifty fifth session executive committee high commissioner programme aac961003 12 october 2004 n 9 information separation internment combatant section 7 10 draw significantly paper presented expert roundtable organized unhcr civilian humanitar ian character asylum june 2004 particular background resource paper prepared conference maintaining civilian humanitarian character asylum rosa da costa unhcr legal protection policy research series department international protection ppla200402 june 2004 well subsequent unhcr draft operational guideline maintaining civilian character asylum mass refugee influx situation n 10 internment camp foreign combatant established sierra leone mapeh mafanta camp combatant liberian war democratic republic congo drc zongo combatant central african republic zambia ukwimi camp combatant angola burundi rwanda drc tanzania mwisa separation facility combatant burundi drc n 11 da costa op cit n 12 full definition 1989 international convention recruitment use financing training mercenary contained glossary term annex africa 1977 convention oau elimination mercenarism africa also applicable n 13 universal declaration human right art 14 article contains exception case prose cutions genuinely arising non political crime act contrary purpose principle united nation n 14 information see unhcr handbook repatriation reintegration activity geneva may 2004 n 15 un general assembly emphasized obligation state accept return national called upon state facilitate return national determined need international protection affirmed need return person undertaken safe humane manner full respect human right dignity irrespective status person concerned un general assembly resolution 57187 para 11 18 december 2002 n 16 refer unhcrdpko note cooperation 2004 n 17 purpose conclusion term armed element used generic term refugee context refers combatant well civilian carrying weapon similarly purpose conclusion term combatant cover person taking active part hostility inter national non international armed conflict entered country asylum n 18 s1999957 s2001331 n 19 ecgc018rev1 n 20 workshop potential role international police refugee camp security ottawa canada march 2001 regional symposium maintaining civilian humanitarian character refugee status camp location pretoria south africa february 2001 international seminar exploring role military refugee camp security oxford uk july 2001", "ProcessedSent": "n 6 un general assembly resolution 56166 human right mass exodus para", "SentID": 9351 }, { "ParagraphID": 2704, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \\n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \\n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \\n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \\n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \\n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \\n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \\n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \\n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \\n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \\n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \\n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \\n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \\n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \\n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \\n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \\n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \\n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \\n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \\n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168355,7 +168355,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2704, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \\n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \\n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \\n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \\n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \\n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \\n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \\n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \\n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \\n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \\n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \\n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \\n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \\n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \\n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \\n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \\n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \\n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \\n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \\n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168373,7 +168373,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2704, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \\n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \\n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \\n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \\n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \\n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \\n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \\n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \\n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \\n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \\n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \\n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \\n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \\n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \\n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \\n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \\n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \\n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \\n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \\n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168384,14 +168384,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004.", + "Sentence": "\n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004.", "newParagraph": "n 1 see example special report secretary general united nation organization mission democratic republic congo s20021005 10 september 2002 section principle involved disarmament demobilization repatriation resettlement reintegration foreign armed group pp 6 7 report secretary general security council liberia 11 september 2003 para 49 planned disarmament demobilization reintegration process liberia suc ceed subregional approach take account presence foreign combatant liberia liberian ex combatant neighbouring country would essential view subre gional dimension conflict disarmament demobilization reintegration programme liberia linked extent possible ongoing disarmament demobilization rein tegration process c\u00f4te ivoire security council resolution 1509 2003 establishing united nation mission liberia para 1f ddr addressing inclusion non liberian combatant security council press release security council call regional approach west africa address cross border issue child soldier mercenary small arm sc8037 25 march 2004 n 2 every state duty refrain organizing encouraging organization irregular force armed band including mercenary incursion territory another state every state duty refrain organizing instigating assisting participating act civil strife terrorist act another state acquiescing organized activity within territory directed towards commission act act referred present paragraph involve threat use force state shall organize assist foment finance incite tolerate subversive terrorist armed activity directed towards violent overthrow regime another state interfere civil strife another state n 3 adopted un general assembly resolution 43173 9 december 1988 n 4 adopted first un congress prevention crime treatment offender geneva 1955 approved un economic social council resolution 663 c xxiv 31 july 1957 2076 lxii 13 may 1977 n 5 adopted un general assembly resolution 45111 14 december 1990 n 6 un general assembly resolution 56166 human right mass exodus para 8 26 february 2002 see also general assembly resolution 58169 para 7 n 7 un general assembly resolution 58169 human right mass exodus 9 march 2004 n 8 un general assembly report fifty fifth session executive committee high commissioner programme aac961003 12 october 2004 n 9 information separation internment combatant section 7 10 draw significantly paper presented expert roundtable organized unhcr civilian humanitar ian character asylum june 2004 particular background resource paper prepared conference maintaining civilian humanitarian character asylum rosa da costa unhcr legal protection policy research series department international protection ppla200402 june 2004 well subsequent unhcr draft operational guideline maintaining civilian character asylum mass refugee influx situation n 10 internment camp foreign combatant established sierra leone mapeh mafanta camp combatant liberian war democratic republic congo drc zongo combatant central african republic zambia ukwimi camp combatant angola burundi rwanda drc tanzania mwisa separation facility combatant burundi drc n 11 da costa op cit n 12 full definition 1989 international convention recruitment use financing training mercenary contained glossary term annex africa 1977 convention oau elimination mercenarism africa also applicable n 13 universal declaration human right art 14 article contains exception case prose cutions genuinely arising non political crime act contrary purpose principle united nation n 14 information see unhcr handbook repatriation reintegration activity geneva may 2004 n 15 un general assembly emphasized obligation state accept return national called upon state facilitate return national determined need international protection affirmed need return person undertaken safe humane manner full respect human right dignity irrespective status person concerned un general assembly resolution 57187 para 11 18 december 2002 n 16 refer unhcrdpko note cooperation 2004 n 17 purpose conclusion term armed element used generic term refugee context refers combatant well civilian carrying weapon similarly purpose conclusion term combatant cover person taking active part hostility inter national non international armed conflict entered country asylum n 18 s1999957 s2001331 n 19 ecgc018rev1 n 20 workshop potential role international police refugee camp security ottawa canada march 2001 regional symposium maintaining civilian humanitarian character refugee status camp location pretoria south africa february 2001 international seminar exploring role military refugee camp security oxford uk july 2001", "ProcessedSent": "n 7 un general assembly resolution 58169 human right mass exodus 9 march 2004", "SentID": 9354 }, { "ParagraphID": 2704, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \\n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \\n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \\n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \\n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \\n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \\n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \\n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \\n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \\n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \\n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \\n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \\n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \\n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \\n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \\n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \\n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \\n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \\n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \\n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168402,14 +168402,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004.", + "Sentence": "\n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004.", "newParagraph": "n 1 see example special report secretary general united nation organization mission democratic republic congo s20021005 10 september 2002 section principle involved disarmament demobilization repatriation resettlement reintegration foreign armed group pp 6 7 report secretary general security council liberia 11 september 2003 para 49 planned disarmament demobilization reintegration process liberia suc ceed subregional approach take account presence foreign combatant liberia liberian ex combatant neighbouring country would essential view subre gional dimension conflict disarmament demobilization reintegration programme liberia linked extent possible ongoing disarmament demobilization rein tegration process c\u00f4te ivoire security council resolution 1509 2003 establishing united nation mission liberia para 1f ddr addressing inclusion non liberian combatant security council press release security council call regional approach west africa address cross border issue child soldier mercenary small arm sc8037 25 march 2004 n 2 every state duty refrain organizing encouraging organization irregular force armed band including mercenary incursion territory another state every state duty refrain organizing instigating assisting participating act civil strife terrorist act another state acquiescing organized activity within territory directed towards commission act act referred present paragraph involve threat use force state shall organize assist foment finance incite tolerate subversive terrorist armed activity directed towards violent overthrow regime another state interfere civil strife another state n 3 adopted un general assembly resolution 43173 9 december 1988 n 4 adopted first un congress prevention crime treatment offender geneva 1955 approved un economic social council resolution 663 c xxiv 31 july 1957 2076 lxii 13 may 1977 n 5 adopted un general assembly resolution 45111 14 december 1990 n 6 un general assembly resolution 56166 human right mass exodus para 8 26 february 2002 see also general assembly resolution 58169 para 7 n 7 un general assembly resolution 58169 human right mass exodus 9 march 2004 n 8 un general assembly report fifty fifth session executive committee high commissioner programme aac961003 12 october 2004 n 9 information separation internment combatant section 7 10 draw significantly paper presented expert roundtable organized unhcr civilian humanitar ian character asylum june 2004 particular background resource paper prepared conference maintaining civilian humanitarian character asylum rosa da costa unhcr legal protection policy research series department international protection ppla200402 june 2004 well subsequent unhcr draft operational guideline maintaining civilian character asylum mass refugee influx situation n 10 internment camp foreign combatant established sierra leone mapeh mafanta camp combatant liberian war democratic republic congo drc zongo combatant central african republic zambia ukwimi camp combatant angola burundi rwanda drc tanzania mwisa separation facility combatant burundi drc n 11 da costa op cit n 12 full definition 1989 international convention recruitment use financing training mercenary contained glossary term annex africa 1977 convention oau elimination mercenarism africa also applicable n 13 universal declaration human right art 14 article contains exception case prose cutions genuinely arising non political crime act contrary purpose principle united nation n 14 information see unhcr handbook repatriation reintegration activity geneva may 2004 n 15 un general assembly emphasized obligation state accept return national called upon state facilitate return national determined need international protection affirmed need return person undertaken safe humane manner full respect human right dignity irrespective status person concerned un general assembly resolution 57187 para 11 18 december 2002 n 16 refer unhcrdpko note cooperation 2004 n 17 purpose conclusion term armed element used generic term refugee context refers combatant well civilian carrying weapon similarly purpose conclusion term combatant cover person taking active part hostility inter national non international armed conflict entered country asylum n 18 s1999957 s2001331 n 19 ecgc018rev1 n 20 workshop potential role international police refugee camp security ottawa canada march 2001 regional symposium maintaining civilian humanitarian character refugee status camp location pretoria south africa february 2001 international seminar exploring role military refugee camp security oxford uk july 2001", "ProcessedSent": "n 8 un general assembly report fifty fifth session executive committee high commissioner programme aac961003 12 october 2004", "SentID": 9355 }, { "ParagraphID": 2704, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \\n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \\n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \\n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \\n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \\n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \\n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \\n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \\n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \\n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \\n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \\n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \\n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \\n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \\n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \\n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \\n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \\n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \\n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \\n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168420,14 +168420,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations.", + "Sentence": "\n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations.", "newParagraph": "n 1 see example special report secretary general united nation organization mission democratic republic congo s20021005 10 september 2002 section principle involved disarmament demobilization repatriation resettlement reintegration foreign armed group pp 6 7 report secretary general security council liberia 11 september 2003 para 49 planned disarmament demobilization reintegration process liberia suc ceed subregional approach take account presence foreign combatant liberia liberian ex combatant neighbouring country would essential view subre gional dimension conflict disarmament demobilization reintegration programme liberia linked extent possible ongoing disarmament demobilization rein tegration process c\u00f4te ivoire security council resolution 1509 2003 establishing united nation mission liberia para 1f ddr addressing inclusion non liberian combatant security council press release security council call regional approach west africa address cross border issue child soldier mercenary small arm sc8037 25 march 2004 n 2 every state duty refrain organizing encouraging organization irregular force armed band including mercenary incursion territory another state every state duty refrain organizing instigating assisting participating act civil strife terrorist act another state acquiescing organized activity within territory directed towards commission act act referred present paragraph involve threat use force state shall organize assist foment finance incite tolerate subversive terrorist armed activity directed towards violent overthrow regime another state interfere civil strife another state n 3 adopted un general assembly resolution 43173 9 december 1988 n 4 adopted first un congress prevention crime treatment offender geneva 1955 approved un economic social council resolution 663 c xxiv 31 july 1957 2076 lxii 13 may 1977 n 5 adopted un general assembly resolution 45111 14 december 1990 n 6 un general assembly resolution 56166 human right mass exodus para 8 26 february 2002 see also general assembly resolution 58169 para 7 n 7 un general assembly resolution 58169 human right mass exodus 9 march 2004 n 8 un general assembly report fifty fifth session executive committee high commissioner programme aac961003 12 october 2004 n 9 information separation internment combatant section 7 10 draw significantly paper presented expert roundtable organized unhcr civilian humanitar ian character asylum june 2004 particular background resource paper prepared conference maintaining civilian humanitarian character asylum rosa da costa unhcr legal protection policy research series department international protection ppla200402 june 2004 well subsequent unhcr draft operational guideline maintaining civilian character asylum mass refugee influx situation n 10 internment camp foreign combatant established sierra leone mapeh mafanta camp combatant liberian war democratic republic congo drc zongo combatant central african republic zambia ukwimi camp combatant angola burundi rwanda drc tanzania mwisa separation facility combatant burundi drc n 11 da costa op cit n 12 full definition 1989 international convention recruitment use financing training mercenary contained glossary term annex africa 1977 convention oau elimination mercenarism africa also applicable n 13 universal declaration human right art 14 article contains exception case prose cutions genuinely arising non political crime act contrary purpose principle united nation n 14 information see unhcr handbook repatriation reintegration activity geneva may 2004 n 15 un general assembly emphasized obligation state accept return national called upon state facilitate return national determined need international protection affirmed need return person undertaken safe humane manner full respect human right dignity irrespective status person concerned un general assembly resolution 57187 para 11 18 december 2002 n 16 refer unhcrdpko note cooperation 2004 n 17 purpose conclusion term armed element used generic term refugee context refers combatant well civilian carrying weapon similarly purpose conclusion term combatant cover person taking active part hostility inter national non international armed conflict entered country asylum n 18 s1999957 s2001331 n 19 ecgc018rev1 n 20 workshop potential role international police refugee camp security ottawa canada march 2001 regional symposium maintaining civilian humanitarian character refugee status camp location pretoria south africa february 2001 international seminar exploring role military refugee camp security oxford uk july 2001", "ProcessedSent": "n 9 information separation internment combatant section 7 10 draw significantly paper presented expert roundtable organized unhcr civilian humanitar ian character asylum june 2004 particular background resource paper prepared conference maintaining civilian humanitarian character asylum rosa da costa unhcr legal protection policy research series department international protection ppla200402 june 2004 well subsequent unhcr draft operational guideline maintaining civilian character asylum mass refugee influx situation", "SentID": 9356 }, { "ParagraphID": 2704, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \\n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \\n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \\n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \\n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \\n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \\n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \\n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \\n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \\n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \\n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \\n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \\n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \\n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \\n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \\n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \\n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \\n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \\n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \\n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168438,14 +168438,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC).", + "Sentence": "\n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC).", "newParagraph": "n 1 see example special report secretary general united nation organization mission democratic republic congo s20021005 10 september 2002 section principle involved disarmament demobilization repatriation resettlement reintegration foreign armed group pp 6 7 report secretary general security council liberia 11 september 2003 para 49 planned disarmament demobilization reintegration process liberia suc ceed subregional approach take account presence foreign combatant liberia liberian ex combatant neighbouring country would essential view subre gional dimension conflict disarmament demobilization reintegration programme liberia linked extent possible ongoing disarmament demobilization rein tegration process c\u00f4te ivoire security council resolution 1509 2003 establishing united nation mission liberia para 1f ddr addressing inclusion non liberian combatant security council press release security council call regional approach west africa address cross border issue child soldier mercenary small arm sc8037 25 march 2004 n 2 every state duty refrain organizing encouraging organization irregular force armed band including mercenary incursion territory another state every state duty refrain organizing instigating assisting participating act civil strife terrorist act another state acquiescing organized activity within territory directed towards commission act act referred present paragraph involve threat use force state shall organize assist foment finance incite tolerate subversive terrorist armed activity directed towards violent overthrow regime another state interfere civil strife another state n 3 adopted un general assembly resolution 43173 9 december 1988 n 4 adopted first un congress prevention crime treatment offender geneva 1955 approved un economic social council resolution 663 c xxiv 31 july 1957 2076 lxii 13 may 1977 n 5 adopted un general assembly resolution 45111 14 december 1990 n 6 un general assembly resolution 56166 human right mass exodus para 8 26 february 2002 see also general assembly resolution 58169 para 7 n 7 un general assembly resolution 58169 human right mass exodus 9 march 2004 n 8 un general assembly report fifty fifth session executive committee high commissioner programme aac961003 12 october 2004 n 9 information separation internment combatant section 7 10 draw significantly paper presented expert roundtable organized unhcr civilian humanitar ian character asylum june 2004 particular background resource paper prepared conference maintaining civilian humanitarian character asylum rosa da costa unhcr legal protection policy research series department international protection ppla200402 june 2004 well subsequent unhcr draft operational guideline maintaining civilian character asylum mass refugee influx situation n 10 internment camp foreign combatant established sierra leone mapeh mafanta camp combatant liberian war democratic republic congo drc zongo combatant central african republic zambia ukwimi camp combatant angola burundi rwanda drc tanzania mwisa separation facility combatant burundi drc n 11 da costa op cit n 12 full definition 1989 international convention recruitment use financing training mercenary contained glossary term annex africa 1977 convention oau elimination mercenarism africa also applicable n 13 universal declaration human right art 14 article contains exception case prose cutions genuinely arising non political crime act contrary purpose principle united nation n 14 information see unhcr handbook repatriation reintegration activity geneva may 2004 n 15 un general assembly emphasized obligation state accept return national called upon state facilitate return national determined need international protection affirmed need return person undertaken safe humane manner full respect human right dignity irrespective status person concerned un general assembly resolution 57187 para 11 18 december 2002 n 16 refer unhcrdpko note cooperation 2004 n 17 purpose conclusion term armed element used generic term refugee context refers combatant well civilian carrying weapon similarly purpose conclusion term combatant cover person taking active part hostility inter national non international armed conflict entered country asylum n 18 s1999957 s2001331 n 19 ecgc018rev1 n 20 workshop potential role international police refugee camp security ottawa canada march 2001 regional symposium maintaining civilian humanitarian character refugee status camp location pretoria south africa february 2001 international seminar exploring role military refugee camp security oxford uk july 2001", "ProcessedSent": "n 10 internment camp foreign combatant established sierra leone mapeh mafanta camp combatant liberian war democratic republic congo drc zongo combatant central african republic zambia ukwimi camp combatant angola burundi rwanda drc tanzania mwisa separation facility combatant burundi drc", "SentID": 9357 }, { "ParagraphID": 2704, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \\n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \\n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \\n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \\n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \\n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \\n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \\n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \\n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \\n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \\n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \\n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \\n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \\n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \\n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \\n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \\n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \\n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \\n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \\n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168456,14 +168456,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 11 Da Costa, op.", + "Sentence": "\n 11 Da Costa, op.", "newParagraph": "n 1 see example special report secretary general united nation organization mission democratic republic congo s20021005 10 september 2002 section principle involved disarmament demobilization repatriation resettlement reintegration foreign armed group pp 6 7 report secretary general security council liberia 11 september 2003 para 49 planned disarmament demobilization reintegration process liberia suc ceed subregional approach take account presence foreign combatant liberia liberian ex combatant neighbouring country would essential view subre gional dimension conflict disarmament demobilization reintegration programme liberia linked extent possible ongoing disarmament demobilization rein tegration process c\u00f4te ivoire security council resolution 1509 2003 establishing united nation mission liberia para 1f ddr addressing inclusion non liberian combatant security council press release security council call regional approach west africa address cross border issue child soldier mercenary small arm sc8037 25 march 2004 n 2 every state duty refrain organizing encouraging organization irregular force armed band including mercenary incursion territory another state every state duty refrain organizing instigating assisting participating act civil strife terrorist act another state acquiescing organized activity within territory directed towards commission act act referred present paragraph involve threat use force state shall organize assist foment finance incite tolerate subversive terrorist armed activity directed towards violent overthrow regime another state interfere civil strife another state n 3 adopted un general assembly resolution 43173 9 december 1988 n 4 adopted first un congress prevention crime treatment offender geneva 1955 approved un economic social council resolution 663 c xxiv 31 july 1957 2076 lxii 13 may 1977 n 5 adopted un general assembly resolution 45111 14 december 1990 n 6 un general assembly resolution 56166 human right mass exodus para 8 26 february 2002 see also general assembly resolution 58169 para 7 n 7 un general assembly resolution 58169 human right mass exodus 9 march 2004 n 8 un general assembly report fifty fifth session executive committee high commissioner programme aac961003 12 october 2004 n 9 information separation internment combatant section 7 10 draw significantly paper presented expert roundtable organized unhcr civilian humanitar ian character asylum june 2004 particular background resource paper prepared conference maintaining civilian humanitarian character asylum rosa da costa unhcr legal protection policy research series department international protection ppla200402 june 2004 well subsequent unhcr draft operational guideline maintaining civilian character asylum mass refugee influx situation n 10 internment camp foreign combatant established sierra leone mapeh mafanta camp combatant liberian war democratic republic congo drc zongo combatant central african republic zambia ukwimi camp combatant angola burundi rwanda drc tanzania mwisa separation facility combatant burundi drc n 11 da costa op cit n 12 full definition 1989 international convention recruitment use financing training mercenary contained glossary term annex africa 1977 convention oau elimination mercenarism africa also applicable n 13 universal declaration human right art 14 article contains exception case prose cutions genuinely arising non political crime act contrary purpose principle united nation n 14 information see unhcr handbook repatriation reintegration activity geneva may 2004 n 15 un general assembly emphasized obligation state accept return national called upon state facilitate return national determined need international protection affirmed need return person undertaken safe humane manner full respect human right dignity irrespective status person concerned un general assembly resolution 57187 para 11 18 december 2002 n 16 refer unhcrdpko note cooperation 2004 n 17 purpose conclusion term armed element used generic term refugee context refers combatant well civilian carrying weapon similarly purpose conclusion term combatant cover person taking active part hostility inter national non international armed conflict entered country asylum n 18 s1999957 s2001331 n 19 ecgc018rev1 n 20 workshop potential role international police refugee camp security ottawa canada march 2001 regional symposium maintaining civilian humanitarian character refugee status camp location pretoria south africa february 2001 international seminar exploring role military refugee camp security oxford uk july 2001", "ProcessedSent": "n 11 da costa op", "SentID": 9358 }, { "ParagraphID": 2704, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \\n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \\n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \\n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \\n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \\n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \\n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \\n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \\n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \\n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \\n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \\n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \\n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \\n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \\n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \\n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \\n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \\n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \\n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \\n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168481,7 +168481,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2704, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \\n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \\n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \\n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \\n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \\n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \\n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \\n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \\n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \\n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \\n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \\n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \\n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \\n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \\n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \\n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \\n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \\n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \\n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \\n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168492,14 +168492,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A.", + "Sentence": "\n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A.", "newParagraph": "n 1 see example special report secretary general united nation organization mission democratic republic congo s20021005 10 september 2002 section principle involved disarmament demobilization repatriation resettlement reintegration foreign armed group pp 6 7 report secretary general security council liberia 11 september 2003 para 49 planned disarmament demobilization reintegration process liberia suc ceed subregional approach take account presence foreign combatant liberia liberian ex combatant neighbouring country would essential view subre gional dimension conflict disarmament demobilization reintegration programme liberia linked extent possible ongoing disarmament demobilization rein tegration process c\u00f4te ivoire security council resolution 1509 2003 establishing united nation mission liberia para 1f ddr addressing inclusion non liberian combatant security council press release security council call regional approach west africa address cross border issue child soldier mercenary small arm sc8037 25 march 2004 n 2 every state duty refrain organizing encouraging organization irregular force armed band including mercenary incursion territory another state every state duty refrain organizing instigating assisting participating act civil strife terrorist act another state acquiescing organized activity within territory directed towards commission act act referred present paragraph involve threat use force state shall organize assist foment finance incite tolerate subversive terrorist armed activity directed towards violent overthrow regime another state interfere civil strife another state n 3 adopted un general assembly resolution 43173 9 december 1988 n 4 adopted first un congress prevention crime treatment offender geneva 1955 approved un economic social council resolution 663 c xxiv 31 july 1957 2076 lxii 13 may 1977 n 5 adopted un general assembly resolution 45111 14 december 1990 n 6 un general assembly resolution 56166 human right mass exodus para 8 26 february 2002 see also general assembly resolution 58169 para 7 n 7 un general assembly resolution 58169 human right mass exodus 9 march 2004 n 8 un general assembly report fifty fifth session executive committee high commissioner programme aac961003 12 october 2004 n 9 information separation internment combatant section 7 10 draw significantly paper presented expert roundtable organized unhcr civilian humanitar ian character asylum june 2004 particular background resource paper prepared conference maintaining civilian humanitarian character asylum rosa da costa unhcr legal protection policy research series department international protection ppla200402 june 2004 well subsequent unhcr draft operational guideline maintaining civilian character asylum mass refugee influx situation n 10 internment camp foreign combatant established sierra leone mapeh mafanta camp combatant liberian war democratic republic congo drc zongo combatant central african republic zambia ukwimi camp combatant angola burundi rwanda drc tanzania mwisa separation facility combatant burundi drc n 11 da costa op cit n 12 full definition 1989 international convention recruitment use financing training mercenary contained glossary term annex africa 1977 convention oau elimination mercenarism africa also applicable n 13 universal declaration human right art 14 article contains exception case prose cutions genuinely arising non political crime act contrary purpose principle united nation n 14 information see unhcr handbook repatriation reintegration activity geneva may 2004 n 15 un general assembly emphasized obligation state accept return national called upon state facilitate return national determined need international protection affirmed need return person undertaken safe humane manner full respect human right dignity irrespective status person concerned un general assembly resolution 57187 para 11 18 december 2002 n 16 refer unhcrdpko note cooperation 2004 n 17 purpose conclusion term armed element used generic term refugee context refers combatant well civilian carrying weapon similarly purpose conclusion term combatant cover person taking active part hostility inter national non international armed conflict entered country asylum n 18 s1999957 s2001331 n 19 ecgc018rev1 n 20 workshop potential role international police refugee camp security ottawa canada march 2001 regional symposium maintaining civilian humanitarian character refugee status camp location pretoria south africa february 2001 international seminar exploring role military refugee camp security oxford uk july 2001", "ProcessedSent": "n 12 full definition 1989 international convention recruitment use financing training mercenary contained glossary term annex", "SentID": 9360 }, { "ParagraphID": 2704, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \\n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \\n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \\n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \\n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \\n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \\n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \\n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \\n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \\n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \\n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \\n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \\n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \\n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \\n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \\n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \\n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \\n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \\n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \\n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168517,7 +168517,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2704, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \\n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \\n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \\n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \\n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \\n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \\n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \\n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \\n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \\n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \\n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \\n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \\n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \\n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \\n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \\n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \\n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \\n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \\n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \\n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168528,14 +168528,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art.", + "Sentence": "\n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art.", "newParagraph": "n 1 see example special report secretary general united nation organization mission democratic republic congo s20021005 10 september 2002 section principle involved disarmament demobilization repatriation resettlement reintegration foreign armed group pp 6 7 report secretary general security council liberia 11 september 2003 para 49 planned disarmament demobilization reintegration process liberia suc ceed subregional approach take account presence foreign combatant liberia liberian ex combatant neighbouring country would essential view subre gional dimension conflict disarmament demobilization reintegration programme liberia linked extent possible ongoing disarmament demobilization rein tegration process c\u00f4te ivoire security council resolution 1509 2003 establishing united nation mission liberia para 1f ddr addressing inclusion non liberian combatant security council press release security council call regional approach west africa address cross border issue child soldier mercenary small arm sc8037 25 march 2004 n 2 every state duty refrain organizing encouraging organization irregular force armed band including mercenary incursion territory another state every state duty refrain organizing instigating assisting participating act civil strife terrorist act another state acquiescing organized activity within territory directed towards commission act act referred present paragraph involve threat use force state shall organize assist foment finance incite tolerate subversive terrorist armed activity directed towards violent overthrow regime another state interfere civil strife another state n 3 adopted un general assembly resolution 43173 9 december 1988 n 4 adopted first un congress prevention crime treatment offender geneva 1955 approved un economic social council resolution 663 c xxiv 31 july 1957 2076 lxii 13 may 1977 n 5 adopted un general assembly resolution 45111 14 december 1990 n 6 un general assembly resolution 56166 human right mass exodus para 8 26 february 2002 see also general assembly resolution 58169 para 7 n 7 un general assembly resolution 58169 human right mass exodus 9 march 2004 n 8 un general assembly report fifty fifth session executive committee high commissioner programme aac961003 12 october 2004 n 9 information separation internment combatant section 7 10 draw significantly paper presented expert roundtable organized unhcr civilian humanitar ian character asylum june 2004 particular background resource paper prepared conference maintaining civilian humanitarian character asylum rosa da costa unhcr legal protection policy research series department international protection ppla200402 june 2004 well subsequent unhcr draft operational guideline maintaining civilian character asylum mass refugee influx situation n 10 internment camp foreign combatant established sierra leone mapeh mafanta camp combatant liberian war democratic republic congo drc zongo combatant central african republic zambia ukwimi camp combatant angola burundi rwanda drc tanzania mwisa separation facility combatant burundi drc n 11 da costa op cit n 12 full definition 1989 international convention recruitment use financing training mercenary contained glossary term annex africa 1977 convention oau elimination mercenarism africa also applicable n 13 universal declaration human right art 14 article contains exception case prose cutions genuinely arising non political crime act contrary purpose principle united nation n 14 information see unhcr handbook repatriation reintegration activity geneva may 2004 n 15 un general assembly emphasized obligation state accept return national called upon state facilitate return national determined need international protection affirmed need return person undertaken safe humane manner full respect human right dignity irrespective status person concerned un general assembly resolution 57187 para 11 18 december 2002 n 16 refer unhcrdpko note cooperation 2004 n 17 purpose conclusion term armed element used generic term refugee context refers combatant well civilian carrying weapon similarly purpose conclusion term combatant cover person taking active part hostility inter national non international armed conflict entered country asylum n 18 s1999957 s2001331 n 19 ecgc018rev1 n 20 workshop potential role international police refugee camp security ottawa canada march 2001 regional symposium maintaining civilian humanitarian character refugee status camp location pretoria south africa february 2001 international seminar exploring role military refugee camp security oxford uk july 2001", "ProcessedSent": "n 13 universal declaration human right art", "SentID": 9362 }, { "ParagraphID": 2704, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \\n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \\n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \\n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \\n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \\n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \\n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \\n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \\n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \\n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \\n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \\n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \\n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \\n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \\n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \\n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \\n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \\n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \\n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \\n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168553,7 +168553,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2704, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \\n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \\n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \\n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \\n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \\n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \\n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \\n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \\n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \\n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \\n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \\n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \\n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \\n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \\n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \\n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \\n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \\n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \\n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \\n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168571,7 +168571,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2704, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \\n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \\n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \\n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \\n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \\n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \\n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \\n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \\n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \\n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \\n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \\n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \\n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \\n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \\n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \\n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \\n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \\n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \\n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \\n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168582,14 +168582,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004.", + "Sentence": "\n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004.", "newParagraph": "n 1 see example special report secretary general united nation organization mission democratic republic congo s20021005 10 september 2002 section principle involved disarmament demobilization repatriation resettlement reintegration foreign armed group pp 6 7 report secretary general security council liberia 11 september 2003 para 49 planned disarmament demobilization reintegration process liberia suc ceed subregional approach take account presence foreign combatant liberia liberian ex combatant neighbouring country would essential view subre gional dimension conflict disarmament demobilization reintegration programme liberia linked extent possible ongoing disarmament demobilization rein tegration process c\u00f4te ivoire security council resolution 1509 2003 establishing united nation mission liberia para 1f ddr addressing inclusion non liberian combatant security council press release security council call regional approach west africa address cross border issue child soldier mercenary small arm sc8037 25 march 2004 n 2 every state duty refrain organizing encouraging organization irregular force armed band including mercenary incursion territory another state every state duty refrain organizing instigating assisting participating act civil strife terrorist act another state acquiescing organized activity within territory directed towards commission act act referred present paragraph involve threat use force state shall organize assist foment finance incite tolerate subversive terrorist armed activity directed towards violent overthrow regime another state interfere civil strife another state n 3 adopted un general assembly resolution 43173 9 december 1988 n 4 adopted first un congress prevention crime treatment offender geneva 1955 approved un economic social council resolution 663 c xxiv 31 july 1957 2076 lxii 13 may 1977 n 5 adopted un general assembly resolution 45111 14 december 1990 n 6 un general assembly resolution 56166 human right mass exodus para 8 26 february 2002 see also general assembly resolution 58169 para 7 n 7 un general assembly resolution 58169 human right mass exodus 9 march 2004 n 8 un general assembly report fifty fifth session executive committee high commissioner programme aac961003 12 october 2004 n 9 information separation internment combatant section 7 10 draw significantly paper presented expert roundtable organized unhcr civilian humanitar ian character asylum june 2004 particular background resource paper prepared conference maintaining civilian humanitarian character asylum rosa da costa unhcr legal protection policy research series department international protection ppla200402 june 2004 well subsequent unhcr draft operational guideline maintaining civilian character asylum mass refugee influx situation n 10 internment camp foreign combatant established sierra leone mapeh mafanta camp combatant liberian war democratic republic congo drc zongo combatant central african republic zambia ukwimi camp combatant angola burundi rwanda drc tanzania mwisa separation facility combatant burundi drc n 11 da costa op cit n 12 full definition 1989 international convention recruitment use financing training mercenary contained glossary term annex africa 1977 convention oau elimination mercenarism africa also applicable n 13 universal declaration human right art 14 article contains exception case prose cutions genuinely arising non political crime act contrary purpose principle united nation n 14 information see unhcr handbook repatriation reintegration activity geneva may 2004 n 15 un general assembly emphasized obligation state accept return national called upon state facilitate return national determined need international protection affirmed need return person undertaken safe humane manner full respect human right dignity irrespective status person concerned un general assembly resolution 57187 para 11 18 december 2002 n 16 refer unhcrdpko note cooperation 2004 n 17 purpose conclusion term armed element used generic term refugee context refers combatant well civilian carrying weapon similarly purpose conclusion term combatant cover person taking active part hostility inter national non international armed conflict entered country asylum n 18 s1999957 s2001331 n 19 ecgc018rev1 n 20 workshop potential role international police refugee camp security ottawa canada march 2001 regional symposium maintaining civilian humanitarian character refugee status camp location pretoria south africa february 2001 international seminar exploring role military refugee camp security oxford uk july 2001", "ProcessedSent": "n 14 information see unhcr handbook repatriation reintegration activity geneva may 2004", "SentID": 9365 }, { "ParagraphID": 2704, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \\n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \\n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \\n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \\n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \\n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \\n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \\n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \\n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \\n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \\n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \\n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \\n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \\n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \\n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \\n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \\n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \\n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \\n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \\n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168600,14 +168600,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para.", + "Sentence": "\n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para.", "newParagraph": "n 1 see example special report secretary general united nation organization mission democratic republic congo s20021005 10 september 2002 section principle involved disarmament demobilization repatriation resettlement reintegration foreign armed group pp 6 7 report secretary general security council liberia 11 september 2003 para 49 planned disarmament demobilization reintegration process liberia suc ceed subregional approach take account presence foreign combatant liberia liberian ex combatant neighbouring country would essential view subre gional dimension conflict disarmament demobilization reintegration programme liberia linked extent possible ongoing disarmament demobilization rein tegration process c\u00f4te ivoire security council resolution 1509 2003 establishing united nation mission liberia para 1f ddr addressing inclusion non liberian combatant security council press release security council call regional approach west africa address cross border issue child soldier mercenary small arm sc8037 25 march 2004 n 2 every state duty refrain organizing encouraging organization irregular force armed band including mercenary incursion territory another state every state duty refrain organizing instigating assisting participating act civil strife terrorist act another state acquiescing organized activity within territory directed towards commission act act referred present paragraph involve threat use force state shall organize assist foment finance incite tolerate subversive terrorist armed activity directed towards violent overthrow regime another state interfere civil strife another state n 3 adopted un general assembly resolution 43173 9 december 1988 n 4 adopted first un congress prevention crime treatment offender geneva 1955 approved un economic social council resolution 663 c xxiv 31 july 1957 2076 lxii 13 may 1977 n 5 adopted un general assembly resolution 45111 14 december 1990 n 6 un general assembly resolution 56166 human right mass exodus para 8 26 february 2002 see also general assembly resolution 58169 para 7 n 7 un general assembly resolution 58169 human right mass exodus 9 march 2004 n 8 un general assembly report fifty fifth session executive committee high commissioner programme aac961003 12 october 2004 n 9 information separation internment combatant section 7 10 draw significantly paper presented expert roundtable organized unhcr civilian humanitar ian character asylum june 2004 particular background resource paper prepared conference maintaining civilian humanitarian character asylum rosa da costa unhcr legal protection policy research series department international protection ppla200402 june 2004 well subsequent unhcr draft operational guideline maintaining civilian character asylum mass refugee influx situation n 10 internment camp foreign combatant established sierra leone mapeh mafanta camp combatant liberian war democratic republic congo drc zongo combatant central african republic zambia ukwimi camp combatant angola burundi rwanda drc tanzania mwisa separation facility combatant burundi drc n 11 da costa op cit n 12 full definition 1989 international convention recruitment use financing training mercenary contained glossary term annex africa 1977 convention oau elimination mercenarism africa also applicable n 13 universal declaration human right art 14 article contains exception case prose cutions genuinely arising non political crime act contrary purpose principle united nation n 14 information see unhcr handbook repatriation reintegration activity geneva may 2004 n 15 un general assembly emphasized obligation state accept return national called upon state facilitate return national determined need international protection affirmed need return person undertaken safe humane manner full respect human right dignity irrespective status person concerned un general assembly resolution 57187 para 11 18 december 2002 n 16 refer unhcrdpko note cooperation 2004 n 17 purpose conclusion term armed element used generic term refugee context refers combatant well civilian carrying weapon similarly purpose conclusion term combatant cover person taking active part hostility inter national non international armed conflict entered country asylum n 18 s1999957 s2001331 n 19 ecgc018rev1 n 20 workshop potential role international police refugee camp security ottawa canada march 2001 regional symposium maintaining civilian humanitarian character refugee status camp location pretoria south africa february 2001 international seminar exploring role military refugee camp security oxford uk july 2001", "ProcessedSent": "n 15 un general assembly emphasized obligation state accept return national called upon state facilitate return national determined need international protection affirmed need return person undertaken safe humane manner full respect human right dignity irrespective status person concerned un general assembly resolution 57187 para", "SentID": 9366 }, { "ParagraphID": 2704, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \\n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \\n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \\n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \\n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \\n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \\n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \\n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \\n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \\n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \\n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \\n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \\n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \\n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \\n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \\n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \\n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \\n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \\n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \\n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168625,7 +168625,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2704, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \\n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \\n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \\n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \\n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \\n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \\n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \\n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \\n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \\n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \\n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \\n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \\n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \\n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \\n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \\n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \\n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \\n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \\n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \\n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168636,14 +168636,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004.", + "Sentence": "\n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004.", "newParagraph": "n 1 see example special report secretary general united nation organization mission democratic republic congo s20021005 10 september 2002 section principle involved disarmament demobilization repatriation resettlement reintegration foreign armed group pp 6 7 report secretary general security council liberia 11 september 2003 para 49 planned disarmament demobilization reintegration process liberia suc ceed subregional approach take account presence foreign combatant liberia liberian ex combatant neighbouring country would essential view subre gional dimension conflict disarmament demobilization reintegration programme liberia linked extent possible ongoing disarmament demobilization rein tegration process c\u00f4te ivoire security council resolution 1509 2003 establishing united nation mission liberia para 1f ddr addressing inclusion non liberian combatant security council press release security council call regional approach west africa address cross border issue child soldier mercenary small arm sc8037 25 march 2004 n 2 every state duty refrain organizing encouraging organization irregular force armed band including mercenary incursion territory another state every state duty refrain organizing instigating assisting participating act civil strife terrorist act another state acquiescing organized activity within territory directed towards commission act act referred present paragraph involve threat use force state shall organize assist foment finance incite tolerate subversive terrorist armed activity directed towards violent overthrow regime another state interfere civil strife another state n 3 adopted un general assembly resolution 43173 9 december 1988 n 4 adopted first un congress prevention crime treatment offender geneva 1955 approved un economic social council resolution 663 c xxiv 31 july 1957 2076 lxii 13 may 1977 n 5 adopted un general assembly resolution 45111 14 december 1990 n 6 un general assembly resolution 56166 human right mass exodus para 8 26 february 2002 see also general assembly resolution 58169 para 7 n 7 un general assembly resolution 58169 human right mass exodus 9 march 2004 n 8 un general assembly report fifty fifth session executive committee high commissioner programme aac961003 12 october 2004 n 9 information separation internment combatant section 7 10 draw significantly paper presented expert roundtable organized unhcr civilian humanitar ian character asylum june 2004 particular background resource paper prepared conference maintaining civilian humanitarian character asylum rosa da costa unhcr legal protection policy research series department international protection ppla200402 june 2004 well subsequent unhcr draft operational guideline maintaining civilian character asylum mass refugee influx situation n 10 internment camp foreign combatant established sierra leone mapeh mafanta camp combatant liberian war democratic republic congo drc zongo combatant central african republic zambia ukwimi camp combatant angola burundi rwanda drc tanzania mwisa separation facility combatant burundi drc n 11 da costa op cit n 12 full definition 1989 international convention recruitment use financing training mercenary contained glossary term annex africa 1977 convention oau elimination mercenarism africa also applicable n 13 universal declaration human right art 14 article contains exception case prose cutions genuinely arising non political crime act contrary purpose principle united nation n 14 information see unhcr handbook repatriation reintegration activity geneva may 2004 n 15 un general assembly emphasized obligation state accept return national called upon state facilitate return national determined need international protection affirmed need return person undertaken safe humane manner full respect human right dignity irrespective status person concerned un general assembly resolution 57187 para 11 18 december 2002 n 16 refer unhcrdpko note cooperation 2004 n 17 purpose conclusion term armed element used generic term refugee context refers combatant well civilian carrying weapon similarly purpose conclusion term combatant cover person taking active part hostility inter national non international armed conflict entered country asylum n 18 s1999957 s2001331 n 19 ecgc018rev1 n 20 workshop potential role international police refugee camp security ottawa canada march 2001 regional symposium maintaining civilian humanitarian character refugee status camp location pretoria south africa february 2001 international seminar exploring role military refugee camp security oxford uk july 2001", "ProcessedSent": "n 16 refer unhcrdpko note cooperation 2004", "SentID": 9368 }, { "ParagraphID": 2704, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \\n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \\n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \\n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \\n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \\n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \\n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \\n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \\n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \\n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \\n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \\n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \\n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \\n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \\n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \\n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \\n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \\n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \\n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \\n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168654,14 +168654,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons.", + "Sentence": "\n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons.", "newParagraph": "n 1 see example special report secretary general united nation organization mission democratic republic congo s20021005 10 september 2002 section principle involved disarmament demobilization repatriation resettlement reintegration foreign armed group pp 6 7 report secretary general security council liberia 11 september 2003 para 49 planned disarmament demobilization reintegration process liberia suc ceed subregional approach take account presence foreign combatant liberia liberian ex combatant neighbouring country would essential view subre gional dimension conflict disarmament demobilization reintegration programme liberia linked extent possible ongoing disarmament demobilization rein tegration process c\u00f4te ivoire security council resolution 1509 2003 establishing united nation mission liberia para 1f ddr addressing inclusion non liberian combatant security council press release security council call regional approach west africa address cross border issue child soldier mercenary small arm sc8037 25 march 2004 n 2 every state duty refrain organizing encouraging organization irregular force armed band including mercenary incursion territory another state every state duty refrain organizing instigating assisting participating act civil strife terrorist act another state acquiescing organized activity within territory directed towards commission act act referred present paragraph involve threat use force state shall organize assist foment finance incite tolerate subversive terrorist armed activity directed towards violent overthrow regime another state interfere civil strife another state n 3 adopted un general assembly resolution 43173 9 december 1988 n 4 adopted first un congress prevention crime treatment offender geneva 1955 approved un economic social council resolution 663 c xxiv 31 july 1957 2076 lxii 13 may 1977 n 5 adopted un general assembly resolution 45111 14 december 1990 n 6 un general assembly resolution 56166 human right mass exodus para 8 26 february 2002 see also general assembly resolution 58169 para 7 n 7 un general assembly resolution 58169 human right mass exodus 9 march 2004 n 8 un general assembly report fifty fifth session executive committee high commissioner programme aac961003 12 october 2004 n 9 information separation internment combatant section 7 10 draw significantly paper presented expert roundtable organized unhcr civilian humanitar ian character asylum june 2004 particular background resource paper prepared conference maintaining civilian humanitarian character asylum rosa da costa unhcr legal protection policy research series department international protection ppla200402 june 2004 well subsequent unhcr draft operational guideline maintaining civilian character asylum mass refugee influx situation n 10 internment camp foreign combatant established sierra leone mapeh mafanta camp combatant liberian war democratic republic congo drc zongo combatant central african republic zambia ukwimi camp combatant angola burundi rwanda drc tanzania mwisa separation facility combatant burundi drc n 11 da costa op cit n 12 full definition 1989 international convention recruitment use financing training mercenary contained glossary term annex africa 1977 convention oau elimination mercenarism africa also applicable n 13 universal declaration human right art 14 article contains exception case prose cutions genuinely arising non political crime act contrary purpose principle united nation n 14 information see unhcr handbook repatriation reintegration activity geneva may 2004 n 15 un general assembly emphasized obligation state accept return national called upon state facilitate return national determined need international protection affirmed need return person undertaken safe humane manner full respect human right dignity irrespective status person concerned un general assembly resolution 57187 para 11 18 december 2002 n 16 refer unhcrdpko note cooperation 2004 n 17 purpose conclusion term armed element used generic term refugee context refers combatant well civilian carrying weapon similarly purpose conclusion term combatant cover person taking active part hostility inter national non international armed conflict entered country asylum n 18 s1999957 s2001331 n 19 ecgc018rev1 n 20 workshop potential role international police refugee camp security ottawa canada march 2001 regional symposium maintaining civilian humanitarian character refugee status camp location pretoria south africa february 2001 international seminar exploring role military refugee camp security oxford uk july 2001", "ProcessedSent": "n 17 purpose conclusion term armed element used generic term refugee context refers combatant well civilian carrying weapon", "SentID": 9369 }, { "ParagraphID": 2704, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \\n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \\n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \\n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \\n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \\n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \\n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \\n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \\n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \\n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \\n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \\n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \\n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \\n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \\n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \\n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \\n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \\n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \\n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \\n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168679,7 +168679,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2704, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \\n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \\n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \\n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \\n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \\n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \\n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \\n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \\n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \\n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \\n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \\n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \\n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \\n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \\n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \\n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \\n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \\n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \\n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \\n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 See, for example, Special Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral on the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, S\/2002\/1005, 10 September 2002, section on \u2018Principles Involved in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement and Reintegration of Foreign Armed Groups\u2019, pp. 6\u20137; Report of the Secretary\u00adGeneral to the Security Council on Liberia, 11 September 2003, para. 49: \u201cFor the planned disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process in Liberia to suc\u00ad ceed, a subregional approach which takes into account the presence of foreign combatants in Liberia and Liberian ex\u00adcombatants in neighbouring countries would be essential In view of the subre\u00ad gional dimensions of the conflict, any disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programme for Liberia should be linked, to the extent possible, to the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and rein\u00ad tegration process in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire \u201d; Security Council resolution 1509 (2003) establishing the United Nations Mission in Liberia, para. 1(f) on DDR: \u201caddressing the inclusion of non\u00adLiberian combatants\u201d; Security Council press release, \u2018Security Council Calls for Regional Approach in West Africa to Address such Cross\u00adborder Issues as Child Soldiers, Mercenaries, Small Arms\u2019, SC\/8037, 25 March 2004. \n 2 \u201cEvery State has the duty to refrain from organizing or encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of another state . . . . Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or use of force No State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.\u201d \n 3 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43\/173, 9 December 1988. \n 4 Adopted by the First UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Geneva 1955, and approved by the UN Economic and Social Council in resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. \n 5 Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 45\/111, 14 December 1990. \n 6 UN General Assembly resolution 56\/166, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, para. 8, 26 February 2002; see also General Assembly resolution 58\/169, para. 7. \n 7 UN General Assembly resolution 58\/169, Human Rights and Mass Exoduses, 9 March 2004. \n 8 UN General Assembly, Report of the Fifty\u00adFifth Session of the Executive Committee of the High Commissioner\u2019s Programme, A\/AC.96\/1003, 12 October 2004. \n 9 Information on separation and internment of combatants in sections 7 to 10 draws significantly from papers presented at the Experts\u2019 Roundtable organized by UNHCR on the Civilian and Humanitar\u00ad ian Character of Asylum (June 2004), in particular the background resource paper prepared for the conference, Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Asylum by Rosa da Costa, UNHCR (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, Department of International Protection, PPLA\/2004\/02, June 2004), as well as the subsequent UNHCR draft, Operational Guidelines on Maintaining the Civilian Character of Asylum in Mass Refugee Influx Situations. \n 10 Internment camps for foreign combatants have been established in Sierra Leone (Mapeh and Mafanta camps for combatants from the Liberian war), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Zongo for combatants from Central African Republic), Zambia (Ukwimi camp for combatants from Angola, Burundi, Rwanda and DRC) and Tanzania (Mwisa separation facility for combatants from Burundi and DRC). \n 11 Da Costa, op. cit. \n 12 The full definition in the 1989 International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is contained in the glossary of terms in Annex A. In Africa, the 1977 Convention of the OAU for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa is also applicable. \n 13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 14. The article contains an exception \u201cin the case of prose\u00ad cutions genuinely arising from non\u00adpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations\u201d. \n 14 For further information see UNHCR, Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities, Geneva, May 2004. \n 15 The UN General Assembly has \u201cemphasiz[ed] the obligation of all States to accept the return of their nationals, call[ed] upon States to facilitate the return of their nationals who have been determined not to be in need of international protection, and affirm[ed] the need for the return of persons to be undertaken in a safe and humane manner and with full respect for their human rights and dignity, irrespective of the status of the persons concerned\u201d (UN General Assembly resolution 57\/187, para. 11, 18 December 2002). \n 16 Refer to UNHCR\/DPKO note on cooperation, 2004. \n 17 For the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201carmed elements\u201d is used as a generic term in a refugee context that refers to combatants as well as civilians carrying weapons. Similarly, for the purpose of this Conclusion, the term \u201ccombatants\u201d covers persons taking active part in hostilities in both inter\u00ad national and non\u00adinternational armed conflict who have entered a country of asylum. \n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -168690,7 +168690,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \\n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \\n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", + "Sentence": "\n 18 S\/1999\/957; S\/2001\/331 \n 19 EC\/GC\/01\/8\/Rev.1 \n 20 Workshop on the Potential Role of International Police in Refugee Camp Security (Ottawa, Canada, March 2001); Regional Symposium on Maintaining the Civilian and Humanitarian Character of Refugee Status, Camps and other locations (Pretoria, South Africa, February 2001); International Seminar on Exploring the Role of the Military in Refugee Camp Security (Oxford, UK, July 2001).", "newParagraph": "n 1 see example special report secretary general united nation organization mission democratic republic congo s20021005 10 september 2002 section principle involved disarmament demobilization repatriation resettlement reintegration foreign armed group pp 6 7 report secretary general security council liberia 11 september 2003 para 49 planned disarmament demobilization reintegration process liberia suc ceed subregional approach take account presence foreign combatant liberia liberian ex combatant neighbouring country would essential view subre gional dimension conflict disarmament demobilization reintegration programme liberia linked extent possible ongoing disarmament demobilization rein tegration process c\u00f4te ivoire security council resolution 1509 2003 establishing united nation mission liberia para 1f ddr addressing inclusion non liberian combatant security council press release security council call regional approach west africa address cross border issue child soldier mercenary small arm sc8037 25 march 2004 n 2 every state duty refrain organizing encouraging organization irregular force armed band including mercenary incursion territory another state every state duty refrain organizing instigating assisting participating act civil strife terrorist act another state acquiescing organized activity within territory directed towards commission act act referred present paragraph involve threat use force state shall organize assist foment finance incite tolerate subversive terrorist armed activity directed towards violent overthrow regime another state interfere civil strife another state n 3 adopted un general assembly resolution 43173 9 december 1988 n 4 adopted first un congress prevention crime treatment offender geneva 1955 approved un economic social council resolution 663 c xxiv 31 july 1957 2076 lxii 13 may 1977 n 5 adopted un general assembly resolution 45111 14 december 1990 n 6 un general assembly resolution 56166 human right mass exodus para 8 26 february 2002 see also general assembly resolution 58169 para 7 n 7 un general assembly resolution 58169 human right mass exodus 9 march 2004 n 8 un general assembly report fifty fifth session executive committee high commissioner programme aac961003 12 october 2004 n 9 information separation internment combatant section 7 10 draw significantly paper presented expert roundtable organized unhcr civilian humanitar ian character asylum june 2004 particular background resource paper prepared conference maintaining civilian humanitarian character asylum rosa da costa unhcr legal protection policy research series department international protection ppla200402 june 2004 well subsequent unhcr draft operational guideline maintaining civilian character asylum mass refugee influx situation n 10 internment camp foreign combatant established sierra leone mapeh mafanta camp combatant liberian war democratic republic congo drc zongo combatant central african republic zambia ukwimi camp combatant angola burundi rwanda drc tanzania mwisa separation facility combatant burundi drc n 11 da costa op cit n 12 full definition 1989 international convention recruitment use financing training mercenary contained glossary term annex africa 1977 convention oau elimination mercenarism africa also applicable n 13 universal declaration human right art 14 article contains exception case prose cutions genuinely arising non political crime act contrary purpose principle united nation n 14 information see unhcr handbook repatriation reintegration activity geneva may 2004 n 15 un general assembly emphasized obligation state accept return national called upon state facilitate return national determined need international protection affirmed need return person undertaken safe humane manner full respect human right dignity irrespective status person concerned un general assembly resolution 57187 para 11 18 december 2002 n 16 refer unhcrdpko note cooperation 2004 n 17 purpose conclusion term armed element used generic term refugee context refers combatant well civilian carrying weapon similarly purpose conclusion term combatant cover person taking active part hostility inter national non international armed conflict entered country asylum n 18 s1999957 s2001331 n 19 ecgc018rev1 n 20 workshop potential role international police refugee camp security ottawa canada march 2001 regional symposium maintaining civilian humanitarian character refugee status camp location pretoria south africa february 2001 international seminar exploring role military refugee camp security oxford uk july 2001", "ProcessedSent": "n 18 s1999957 s2001331 n 19 ecgc018rev1 n 20 workshop potential role international police refugee camp security ottawa canada march 2001 regional symposium maintaining civilian humanitarian character refugee status camp location pretoria south africa february 2001 international seminar exploring role military refugee camp security oxford uk july 2001", "SentID": 9371 @@ -169129,7 +169129,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2711, - "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -169147,7 +169147,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2711, - "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -169165,7 +169165,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2711, - "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -169183,7 +169183,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2711, - "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -169194,7 +169194,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "newParagraph": "annex contains list term definition abbreviation used standard com plete glossary term definition abbreviation used series integrated ddr standard iddrs given iddrs 120 iddrs series word shall may must used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "ProcessedSent": "use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "SentID": 9399 @@ -170641,7 +170641,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2738, - "Paragraph": "The food assistance component of a DDR process shall also consider gender analysis and power dynamics in household resource distribution, as it may be necessary to create specific benefit tracks for women. As with all food assistance programmes, those established in support of a DDR process shall be gender-responsive and appropriate to the rights and specific needs of women and girls (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). A gender-transformative approach to food assistance shall be applied, promoting women\u2019s roles in decision-making, leadership, distribution, and monitoring and evaluation. More specifically: \\n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles. \\n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.). The transfer type and delivery mechanism shall not reinforce discriminatory and restrictive gender roles. \\n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring. \\n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups. \\n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings. \\n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed. These mechanisms shall ensure that women have a safe space to report protection issues and incidents of sexual and gender-based violence. An accountability system should be designed, established and managed to ensure appropriate follow up. \\n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process. Opportunities for women to take a more active role in designing and implementing food assistance programmes shall also be promoted. \\n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points. \\n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", + "Paragraph": "The food assistance component of a DDR process shall also consider gender analysis and power dynamics in household resource distribution, as it may be necessary to create specific benefit tracks for women. As with all food assistance programmes, those established in support of a DDR process shall be gender-responsive and appropriate to the rights and specific needs of women and girls (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). A gender-transformative approach to food assistance shall be applied, promoting women\u2019s roles in decision-making, leadership, distribution, and monitoring and evaluation. More specifically: \n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles. \n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.). The transfer type and delivery mechanism shall not reinforce discriminatory and restrictive gender roles. \n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring. \n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups. \n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings. \n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed. These mechanisms shall ensure that women have a safe space to report protection issues and incidents of sexual and gender-based violence. An accountability system should be designed, established and managed to ensure appropriate follow up. \n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process. Opportunities for women to take a more active role in designing and implementing food assistance programmes shall also be promoted. \n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points. \n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -170659,7 +170659,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2738, - "Paragraph": "The food assistance component of a DDR process shall also consider gender analysis and power dynamics in household resource distribution, as it may be necessary to create specific benefit tracks for women. As with all food assistance programmes, those established in support of a DDR process shall be gender-responsive and appropriate to the rights and specific needs of women and girls (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). A gender-transformative approach to food assistance shall be applied, promoting women\u2019s roles in decision-making, leadership, distribution, and monitoring and evaluation. More specifically: \\n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles. \\n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.). The transfer type and delivery mechanism shall not reinforce discriminatory and restrictive gender roles. \\n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring. \\n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups. \\n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings. \\n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed. These mechanisms shall ensure that women have a safe space to report protection issues and incidents of sexual and gender-based violence. An accountability system should be designed, established and managed to ensure appropriate follow up. \\n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process. Opportunities for women to take a more active role in designing and implementing food assistance programmes shall also be promoted. \\n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points. \\n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", + "Paragraph": "The food assistance component of a DDR process shall also consider gender analysis and power dynamics in household resource distribution, as it may be necessary to create specific benefit tracks for women. As with all food assistance programmes, those established in support of a DDR process shall be gender-responsive and appropriate to the rights and specific needs of women and girls (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). A gender-transformative approach to food assistance shall be applied, promoting women\u2019s roles in decision-making, leadership, distribution, and monitoring and evaluation. More specifically: \n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles. \n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.). The transfer type and delivery mechanism shall not reinforce discriminatory and restrictive gender roles. \n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring. \n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups. \n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings. \n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed. These mechanisms shall ensure that women have a safe space to report protection issues and incidents of sexual and gender-based violence. An accountability system should be designed, established and managed to ensure appropriate follow up. \n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process. Opportunities for women to take a more active role in designing and implementing food assistance programmes shall also be promoted. \n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points. \n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -170677,7 +170677,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2738, - "Paragraph": "The food assistance component of a DDR process shall also consider gender analysis and power dynamics in household resource distribution, as it may be necessary to create specific benefit tracks for women. As with all food assistance programmes, those established in support of a DDR process shall be gender-responsive and appropriate to the rights and specific needs of women and girls (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). A gender-transformative approach to food assistance shall be applied, promoting women\u2019s roles in decision-making, leadership, distribution, and monitoring and evaluation. More specifically: \\n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles. \\n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.). The transfer type and delivery mechanism shall not reinforce discriminatory and restrictive gender roles. \\n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring. \\n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups. \\n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings. \\n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed. These mechanisms shall ensure that women have a safe space to report protection issues and incidents of sexual and gender-based violence. An accountability system should be designed, established and managed to ensure appropriate follow up. \\n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process. Opportunities for women to take a more active role in designing and implementing food assistance programmes shall also be promoted. \\n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points. \\n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", + "Paragraph": "The food assistance component of a DDR process shall also consider gender analysis and power dynamics in household resource distribution, as it may be necessary to create specific benefit tracks for women. As with all food assistance programmes, those established in support of a DDR process shall be gender-responsive and appropriate to the rights and specific needs of women and girls (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). A gender-transformative approach to food assistance shall be applied, promoting women\u2019s roles in decision-making, leadership, distribution, and monitoring and evaluation. More specifically: \n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles. \n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.). The transfer type and delivery mechanism shall not reinforce discriminatory and restrictive gender roles. \n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring. \n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups. \n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings. \n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed. These mechanisms shall ensure that women have a safe space to report protection issues and incidents of sexual and gender-based violence. An accountability system should be designed, established and managed to ensure appropriate follow up. \n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process. Opportunities for women to take a more active role in designing and implementing food assistance programmes shall also be promoted. \n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points. \n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -170695,7 +170695,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2738, - "Paragraph": "The food assistance component of a DDR process shall also consider gender analysis and power dynamics in household resource distribution, as it may be necessary to create specific benefit tracks for women. As with all food assistance programmes, those established in support of a DDR process shall be gender-responsive and appropriate to the rights and specific needs of women and girls (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). A gender-transformative approach to food assistance shall be applied, promoting women\u2019s roles in decision-making, leadership, distribution, and monitoring and evaluation. More specifically: \\n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles. \\n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.). The transfer type and delivery mechanism shall not reinforce discriminatory and restrictive gender roles. \\n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring. \\n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups. \\n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings. \\n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed. These mechanisms shall ensure that women have a safe space to report protection issues and incidents of sexual and gender-based violence. An accountability system should be designed, established and managed to ensure appropriate follow up. \\n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process. Opportunities for women to take a more active role in designing and implementing food assistance programmes shall also be promoted. \\n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points. \\n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", + "Paragraph": "The food assistance component of a DDR process shall also consider gender analysis and power dynamics in household resource distribution, as it may be necessary to create specific benefit tracks for women. As with all food assistance programmes, those established in support of a DDR process shall be gender-responsive and appropriate to the rights and specific needs of women and girls (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). A gender-transformative approach to food assistance shall be applied, promoting women\u2019s roles in decision-making, leadership, distribution, and monitoring and evaluation. More specifically: \n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles. \n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.). The transfer type and delivery mechanism shall not reinforce discriminatory and restrictive gender roles. \n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring. \n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups. \n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings. \n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed. These mechanisms shall ensure that women have a safe space to report protection issues and incidents of sexual and gender-based violence. An accountability system should be designed, established and managed to ensure appropriate follow up. \n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process. Opportunities for women to take a more active role in designing and implementing food assistance programmes shall also be promoted. \n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points. \n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -170706,14 +170706,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.3 Gender responsive and inclusive", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "More specifically: \\n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles.", + "Sentence": "More specifically: \n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles.", "newParagraph": "food assistance component ddr process shall also consider gender analysis power dynamic household resource distribution may necessary create specific benefit track woman food assistance programme established support ddr process shall genderresponsive appropriate right specific need woman girl see iddrs 510 woman gender ddr gendertransformative approach food assistance shall applied promoting woman role decisionmaking leadership distribution monitoring evaluation specifically n gendertransformative lens shall integrated design delivery food assistance component leveraging opportunity support genderequitable engagement men woman boy girl including ensuring equal representation woman leadership role n woman men recipient food assistance shall determine selection transfer modality delivery mechanism time date place quantity food separate queue etc transfer type delivery mechanism shall reinforce discriminatory restrictive gender role n provision food assistance shall monitored gender genderequality consideration shall integrated tool procedure reporting onsite post distribution market monitoring n change food security nutrition situation decisionmaking authority empowerment equitable participation access protection safety issue satisfaction assistance received shall monitored individual woman men girl boy household community group n food assistance staff shall receive training protection sexual exploitation abuse psea including regular refresher training n confidential complaint feedback mechanism related food assistance accessible woman men girl boy shall designed established managed mechanism shall ensure woman safe space report protection issue incident sexual genderbased violence accountability system designed established managed ensure appropriate follow n possible violation woman girl right shall identified addressed responded supporting food assistance component ddr process opportunity woman take active role designing implementing food assistance programme shall also promoted n equal representation woman men peace mediation decisionmaking level stage humanitarian assistance shall ensured including food management committee distribution point n participation woman organization capacitybuilding humanitarian response rehabilitation recovery shall ensured", "ProcessedSent": "specifically n gendertransformative lens shall integrated design delivery food assistance component leveraging opportunity support genderequitable engagement men woman boy girl including ensuring equal representation woman leadership role", "SentID": 9483 }, { "ParagraphID": 2738, - "Paragraph": "The food assistance component of a DDR process shall also consider gender analysis and power dynamics in household resource distribution, as it may be necessary to create specific benefit tracks for women. As with all food assistance programmes, those established in support of a DDR process shall be gender-responsive and appropriate to the rights and specific needs of women and girls (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). A gender-transformative approach to food assistance shall be applied, promoting women\u2019s roles in decision-making, leadership, distribution, and monitoring and evaluation. More specifically: \\n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles. \\n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.). The transfer type and delivery mechanism shall not reinforce discriminatory and restrictive gender roles. \\n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring. \\n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups. \\n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings. \\n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed. These mechanisms shall ensure that women have a safe space to report protection issues and incidents of sexual and gender-based violence. An accountability system should be designed, established and managed to ensure appropriate follow up. \\n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process. Opportunities for women to take a more active role in designing and implementing food assistance programmes shall also be promoted. \\n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points. \\n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", + "Paragraph": "The food assistance component of a DDR process shall also consider gender analysis and power dynamics in household resource distribution, as it may be necessary to create specific benefit tracks for women. As with all food assistance programmes, those established in support of a DDR process shall be gender-responsive and appropriate to the rights and specific needs of women and girls (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). A gender-transformative approach to food assistance shall be applied, promoting women\u2019s roles in decision-making, leadership, distribution, and monitoring and evaluation. More specifically: \n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles. \n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.). The transfer type and delivery mechanism shall not reinforce discriminatory and restrictive gender roles. \n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring. \n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups. \n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings. \n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed. These mechanisms shall ensure that women have a safe space to report protection issues and incidents of sexual and gender-based violence. An accountability system should be designed, established and managed to ensure appropriate follow up. \n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process. Opportunities for women to take a more active role in designing and implementing food assistance programmes shall also be promoted. \n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points. \n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -170724,14 +170724,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.3 Gender responsive and inclusive", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.).", + "Sentence": "\n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.).", "newParagraph": "food assistance component ddr process shall also consider gender analysis power dynamic household resource distribution may necessary create specific benefit track woman food assistance programme established support ddr process shall genderresponsive appropriate right specific need woman girl see iddrs 510 woman gender ddr gendertransformative approach food assistance shall applied promoting woman role decisionmaking leadership distribution monitoring evaluation specifically n gendertransformative lens shall integrated design delivery food assistance component leveraging opportunity support genderequitable engagement men woman boy girl including ensuring equal representation woman leadership role n woman men recipient food assistance shall determine selection transfer modality delivery mechanism time date place quantity food separate queue etc transfer type delivery mechanism shall reinforce discriminatory restrictive gender role n provision food assistance shall monitored gender genderequality consideration shall integrated tool procedure reporting onsite post distribution market monitoring n change food security nutrition situation decisionmaking authority empowerment equitable participation access protection safety issue satisfaction assistance received shall monitored individual woman men girl boy household community group n food assistance staff shall receive training protection sexual exploitation abuse psea including regular refresher training n confidential complaint feedback mechanism related food assistance accessible woman men girl boy shall designed established managed mechanism shall ensure woman safe space report protection issue incident sexual genderbased violence accountability system designed established managed ensure appropriate follow n possible violation woman girl right shall identified addressed responded supporting food assistance component ddr process opportunity woman take active role designing implementing food assistance programme shall also promoted n equal representation woman men peace mediation decisionmaking level stage humanitarian assistance shall ensured including food management committee distribution point n participation woman organization capacitybuilding humanitarian response rehabilitation recovery shall ensured", "ProcessedSent": "n woman men recipient food assistance shall determine selection transfer modality delivery mechanism time date place quantity food separate queue etc", "SentID": 9484 }, { "ParagraphID": 2738, - "Paragraph": "The food assistance component of a DDR process shall also consider gender analysis and power dynamics in household resource distribution, as it may be necessary to create specific benefit tracks for women. As with all food assistance programmes, those established in support of a DDR process shall be gender-responsive and appropriate to the rights and specific needs of women and girls (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). A gender-transformative approach to food assistance shall be applied, promoting women\u2019s roles in decision-making, leadership, distribution, and monitoring and evaluation. More specifically: \\n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles. \\n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.). The transfer type and delivery mechanism shall not reinforce discriminatory and restrictive gender roles. \\n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring. \\n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups. \\n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings. \\n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed. These mechanisms shall ensure that women have a safe space to report protection issues and incidents of sexual and gender-based violence. An accountability system should be designed, established and managed to ensure appropriate follow up. \\n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process. Opportunities for women to take a more active role in designing and implementing food assistance programmes shall also be promoted. \\n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points. \\n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", + "Paragraph": "The food assistance component of a DDR process shall also consider gender analysis and power dynamics in household resource distribution, as it may be necessary to create specific benefit tracks for women. As with all food assistance programmes, those established in support of a DDR process shall be gender-responsive and appropriate to the rights and specific needs of women and girls (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). A gender-transformative approach to food assistance shall be applied, promoting women\u2019s roles in decision-making, leadership, distribution, and monitoring and evaluation. More specifically: \n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles. \n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.). The transfer type and delivery mechanism shall not reinforce discriminatory and restrictive gender roles. \n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring. \n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups. \n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings. \n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed. These mechanisms shall ensure that women have a safe space to report protection issues and incidents of sexual and gender-based violence. An accountability system should be designed, established and managed to ensure appropriate follow up. \n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process. Opportunities for women to take a more active role in designing and implementing food assistance programmes shall also be promoted. \n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points. \n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -170749,7 +170749,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2738, - "Paragraph": "The food assistance component of a DDR process shall also consider gender analysis and power dynamics in household resource distribution, as it may be necessary to create specific benefit tracks for women. As with all food assistance programmes, those established in support of a DDR process shall be gender-responsive and appropriate to the rights and specific needs of women and girls (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). A gender-transformative approach to food assistance shall be applied, promoting women\u2019s roles in decision-making, leadership, distribution, and monitoring and evaluation. More specifically: \\n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles. \\n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.). The transfer type and delivery mechanism shall not reinforce discriminatory and restrictive gender roles. \\n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring. \\n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups. \\n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings. \\n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed. These mechanisms shall ensure that women have a safe space to report protection issues and incidents of sexual and gender-based violence. An accountability system should be designed, established and managed to ensure appropriate follow up. \\n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process. Opportunities for women to take a more active role in designing and implementing food assistance programmes shall also be promoted. \\n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points. \\n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", + "Paragraph": "The food assistance component of a DDR process shall also consider gender analysis and power dynamics in household resource distribution, as it may be necessary to create specific benefit tracks for women. As with all food assistance programmes, those established in support of a DDR process shall be gender-responsive and appropriate to the rights and specific needs of women and girls (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). A gender-transformative approach to food assistance shall be applied, promoting women\u2019s roles in decision-making, leadership, distribution, and monitoring and evaluation. More specifically: \n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles. \n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.). The transfer type and delivery mechanism shall not reinforce discriminatory and restrictive gender roles. \n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring. \n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups. \n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings. \n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed. These mechanisms shall ensure that women have a safe space to report protection issues and incidents of sexual and gender-based violence. An accountability system should be designed, established and managed to ensure appropriate follow up. \n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process. Opportunities for women to take a more active role in designing and implementing food assistance programmes shall also be promoted. \n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points. \n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -170760,14 +170760,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.3 Gender responsive and inclusive", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring.", + "Sentence": "\n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring.", "newParagraph": "food assistance component ddr process shall also consider gender analysis power dynamic household resource distribution may necessary create specific benefit track woman food assistance programme established support ddr process shall genderresponsive appropriate right specific need woman girl see iddrs 510 woman gender ddr gendertransformative approach food assistance shall applied promoting woman role decisionmaking leadership distribution monitoring evaluation specifically n gendertransformative lens shall integrated design delivery food assistance component leveraging opportunity support genderequitable engagement men woman boy girl including ensuring equal representation woman leadership role n woman men recipient food assistance shall determine selection transfer modality delivery mechanism time date place quantity food separate queue etc transfer type delivery mechanism shall reinforce discriminatory restrictive gender role n provision food assistance shall monitored gender genderequality consideration shall integrated tool procedure reporting onsite post distribution market monitoring n change food security nutrition situation decisionmaking authority empowerment equitable participation access protection safety issue satisfaction assistance received shall monitored individual woman men girl boy household community group n food assistance staff shall receive training protection sexual exploitation abuse psea including regular refresher training n confidential complaint feedback mechanism related food assistance accessible woman men girl boy shall designed established managed mechanism shall ensure woman safe space report protection issue incident sexual genderbased violence accountability system designed established managed ensure appropriate follow n possible violation woman girl right shall identified addressed responded supporting food assistance component ddr process opportunity woman take active role designing implementing food assistance programme shall also promoted n equal representation woman men peace mediation decisionmaking level stage humanitarian assistance shall ensured including food management committee distribution point n participation woman organization capacitybuilding humanitarian response rehabilitation recovery shall ensured", "ProcessedSent": "n provision food assistance shall monitored gender genderequality consideration shall integrated tool procedure reporting onsite post distribution market monitoring", "SentID": 9486 }, { "ParagraphID": 2738, - "Paragraph": "The food assistance component of a DDR process shall also consider gender analysis and power dynamics in household resource distribution, as it may be necessary to create specific benefit tracks for women. As with all food assistance programmes, those established in support of a DDR process shall be gender-responsive and appropriate to the rights and specific needs of women and girls (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). A gender-transformative approach to food assistance shall be applied, promoting women\u2019s roles in decision-making, leadership, distribution, and monitoring and evaluation. More specifically: \\n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles. \\n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.). The transfer type and delivery mechanism shall not reinforce discriminatory and restrictive gender roles. \\n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring. \\n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups. \\n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings. \\n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed. These mechanisms shall ensure that women have a safe space to report protection issues and incidents of sexual and gender-based violence. An accountability system should be designed, established and managed to ensure appropriate follow up. \\n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process. Opportunities for women to take a more active role in designing and implementing food assistance programmes shall also be promoted. \\n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points. \\n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", + "Paragraph": "The food assistance component of a DDR process shall also consider gender analysis and power dynamics in household resource distribution, as it may be necessary to create specific benefit tracks for women. As with all food assistance programmes, those established in support of a DDR process shall be gender-responsive and appropriate to the rights and specific needs of women and girls (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). A gender-transformative approach to food assistance shall be applied, promoting women\u2019s roles in decision-making, leadership, distribution, and monitoring and evaluation. More specifically: \n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles. \n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.). The transfer type and delivery mechanism shall not reinforce discriminatory and restrictive gender roles. \n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring. \n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups. \n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings. \n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed. These mechanisms shall ensure that women have a safe space to report protection issues and incidents of sexual and gender-based violence. An accountability system should be designed, established and managed to ensure appropriate follow up. \n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process. Opportunities for women to take a more active role in designing and implementing food assistance programmes shall also be promoted. \n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points. \n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -170778,14 +170778,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.3 Gender responsive and inclusive", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups.", + "Sentence": "\n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups.", "newParagraph": "food assistance component ddr process shall also consider gender analysis power dynamic household resource distribution may necessary create specific benefit track woman food assistance programme established support ddr process shall genderresponsive appropriate right specific need woman girl see iddrs 510 woman gender ddr gendertransformative approach food assistance shall applied promoting woman role decisionmaking leadership distribution monitoring evaluation specifically n gendertransformative lens shall integrated design delivery food assistance component leveraging opportunity support genderequitable engagement men woman boy girl including ensuring equal representation woman leadership role n woman men recipient food assistance shall determine selection transfer modality delivery mechanism time date place quantity food separate queue etc transfer type delivery mechanism shall reinforce discriminatory restrictive gender role n provision food assistance shall monitored gender genderequality consideration shall integrated tool procedure reporting onsite post distribution market monitoring n change food security nutrition situation decisionmaking authority empowerment equitable participation access protection safety issue satisfaction assistance received shall monitored individual woman men girl boy household community group n food assistance staff shall receive training protection sexual exploitation abuse psea including regular refresher training n confidential complaint feedback mechanism related food assistance accessible woman men girl boy shall designed established managed mechanism shall ensure woman safe space report protection issue incident sexual genderbased violence accountability system designed established managed ensure appropriate follow n possible violation woman girl right shall identified addressed responded supporting food assistance component ddr process opportunity woman take active role designing implementing food assistance programme shall also promoted n equal representation woman men peace mediation decisionmaking level stage humanitarian assistance shall ensured including food management committee distribution point n participation woman organization capacitybuilding humanitarian response rehabilitation recovery shall ensured", "ProcessedSent": "n change food security nutrition situation decisionmaking authority empowerment equitable participation access protection safety issue satisfaction assistance received shall monitored individual woman men girl boy household community group", "SentID": 9487 }, { "ParagraphID": 2738, - "Paragraph": "The food assistance component of a DDR process shall also consider gender analysis and power dynamics in household resource distribution, as it may be necessary to create specific benefit tracks for women. As with all food assistance programmes, those established in support of a DDR process shall be gender-responsive and appropriate to the rights and specific needs of women and girls (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). A gender-transformative approach to food assistance shall be applied, promoting women\u2019s roles in decision-making, leadership, distribution, and monitoring and evaluation. More specifically: \\n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles. \\n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.). The transfer type and delivery mechanism shall not reinforce discriminatory and restrictive gender roles. \\n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring. \\n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups. \\n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings. \\n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed. These mechanisms shall ensure that women have a safe space to report protection issues and incidents of sexual and gender-based violence. An accountability system should be designed, established and managed to ensure appropriate follow up. \\n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process. Opportunities for women to take a more active role in designing and implementing food assistance programmes shall also be promoted. \\n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points. \\n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", + "Paragraph": "The food assistance component of a DDR process shall also consider gender analysis and power dynamics in household resource distribution, as it may be necessary to create specific benefit tracks for women. As with all food assistance programmes, those established in support of a DDR process shall be gender-responsive and appropriate to the rights and specific needs of women and girls (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). A gender-transformative approach to food assistance shall be applied, promoting women\u2019s roles in decision-making, leadership, distribution, and monitoring and evaluation. More specifically: \n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles. \n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.). The transfer type and delivery mechanism shall not reinforce discriminatory and restrictive gender roles. \n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring. \n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups. \n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings. \n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed. These mechanisms shall ensure that women have a safe space to report protection issues and incidents of sexual and gender-based violence. An accountability system should be designed, established and managed to ensure appropriate follow up. \n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process. Opportunities for women to take a more active role in designing and implementing food assistance programmes shall also be promoted. \n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points. \n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -170796,14 +170796,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.3 Gender responsive and inclusive", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings.", + "Sentence": "\n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings.", "newParagraph": "food assistance component ddr process shall also consider gender analysis power dynamic household resource distribution may necessary create specific benefit track woman food assistance programme established support ddr process shall genderresponsive appropriate right specific need woman girl see iddrs 510 woman gender ddr gendertransformative approach food assistance shall applied promoting woman role decisionmaking leadership distribution monitoring evaluation specifically n gendertransformative lens shall integrated design delivery food assistance component leveraging opportunity support genderequitable engagement men woman boy girl including ensuring equal representation woman leadership role n woman men recipient food assistance shall determine selection transfer modality delivery mechanism time date place quantity food separate queue etc transfer type delivery mechanism shall reinforce discriminatory restrictive gender role n provision food assistance shall monitored gender genderequality consideration shall integrated tool procedure reporting onsite post distribution market monitoring n change food security nutrition situation decisionmaking authority empowerment equitable participation access protection safety issue satisfaction assistance received shall monitored individual woman men girl boy household community group n food assistance staff shall receive training protection sexual exploitation abuse psea including regular refresher training n confidential complaint feedback mechanism related food assistance accessible woman men girl boy shall designed established managed mechanism shall ensure woman safe space report protection issue incident sexual genderbased violence accountability system designed established managed ensure appropriate follow n possible violation woman girl right shall identified addressed responded supporting food assistance component ddr process opportunity woman take active role designing implementing food assistance programme shall also promoted n equal representation woman men peace mediation decisionmaking level stage humanitarian assistance shall ensured including food management committee distribution point n participation woman organization capacitybuilding humanitarian response rehabilitation recovery shall ensured", "ProcessedSent": "n food assistance staff shall receive training protection sexual exploitation abuse psea including regular refresher training", "SentID": 9488 }, { "ParagraphID": 2738, - "Paragraph": "The food assistance component of a DDR process shall also consider gender analysis and power dynamics in household resource distribution, as it may be necessary to create specific benefit tracks for women. As with all food assistance programmes, those established in support of a DDR process shall be gender-responsive and appropriate to the rights and specific needs of women and girls (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). A gender-transformative approach to food assistance shall be applied, promoting women\u2019s roles in decision-making, leadership, distribution, and monitoring and evaluation. More specifically: \\n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles. \\n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.). The transfer type and delivery mechanism shall not reinforce discriminatory and restrictive gender roles. \\n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring. \\n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups. \\n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings. \\n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed. These mechanisms shall ensure that women have a safe space to report protection issues and incidents of sexual and gender-based violence. An accountability system should be designed, established and managed to ensure appropriate follow up. \\n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process. Opportunities for women to take a more active role in designing and implementing food assistance programmes shall also be promoted. \\n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points. \\n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", + "Paragraph": "The food assistance component of a DDR process shall also consider gender analysis and power dynamics in household resource distribution, as it may be necessary to create specific benefit tracks for women. As with all food assistance programmes, those established in support of a DDR process shall be gender-responsive and appropriate to the rights and specific needs of women and girls (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). A gender-transformative approach to food assistance shall be applied, promoting women\u2019s roles in decision-making, leadership, distribution, and monitoring and evaluation. More specifically: \n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles. \n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.). The transfer type and delivery mechanism shall not reinforce discriminatory and restrictive gender roles. \n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring. \n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups. \n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings. \n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed. These mechanisms shall ensure that women have a safe space to report protection issues and incidents of sexual and gender-based violence. An accountability system should be designed, established and managed to ensure appropriate follow up. \n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process. Opportunities for women to take a more active role in designing and implementing food assistance programmes shall also be promoted. \n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points. \n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -170814,14 +170814,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.3 Gender responsive and inclusive", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed.", + "Sentence": "\n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed.", "newParagraph": "food assistance component ddr process shall also consider gender analysis power dynamic household resource distribution may necessary create specific benefit track woman food assistance programme established support ddr process shall genderresponsive appropriate right specific need woman girl see iddrs 510 woman gender ddr gendertransformative approach food assistance shall applied promoting woman role decisionmaking leadership distribution monitoring evaluation specifically n gendertransformative lens shall integrated design delivery food assistance component leveraging opportunity support genderequitable engagement men woman boy girl including ensuring equal representation woman leadership role n woman men recipient food assistance shall determine selection transfer modality delivery mechanism time date place quantity food separate queue etc transfer type delivery mechanism shall reinforce discriminatory restrictive gender role n provision food assistance shall monitored gender genderequality consideration shall integrated tool procedure reporting onsite post distribution market monitoring n change food security nutrition situation decisionmaking authority empowerment equitable participation access protection safety issue satisfaction assistance received shall monitored individual woman men girl boy household community group n food assistance staff shall receive training protection sexual exploitation abuse psea including regular refresher training n confidential complaint feedback mechanism related food assistance accessible woman men girl boy shall designed established managed mechanism shall ensure woman safe space report protection issue incident sexual genderbased violence accountability system designed established managed ensure appropriate follow n possible violation woman girl right shall identified addressed responded supporting food assistance component ddr process opportunity woman take active role designing implementing food assistance programme shall also promoted n equal representation woman men peace mediation decisionmaking level stage humanitarian assistance shall ensured including food management committee distribution point n participation woman organization capacitybuilding humanitarian response rehabilitation recovery shall ensured", "ProcessedSent": "n confidential complaint feedback mechanism related food assistance accessible woman men girl boy shall designed established managed", "SentID": 9489 }, { "ParagraphID": 2738, - "Paragraph": "The food assistance component of a DDR process shall also consider gender analysis and power dynamics in household resource distribution, as it may be necessary to create specific benefit tracks for women. As with all food assistance programmes, those established in support of a DDR process shall be gender-responsive and appropriate to the rights and specific needs of women and girls (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). A gender-transformative approach to food assistance shall be applied, promoting women\u2019s roles in decision-making, leadership, distribution, and monitoring and evaluation. More specifically: \\n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles. \\n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.). The transfer type and delivery mechanism shall not reinforce discriminatory and restrictive gender roles. \\n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring. \\n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups. \\n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings. \\n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed. These mechanisms shall ensure that women have a safe space to report protection issues and incidents of sexual and gender-based violence. An accountability system should be designed, established and managed to ensure appropriate follow up. \\n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process. Opportunities for women to take a more active role in designing and implementing food assistance programmes shall also be promoted. \\n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points. \\n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", + "Paragraph": "The food assistance component of a DDR process shall also consider gender analysis and power dynamics in household resource distribution, as it may be necessary to create specific benefit tracks for women. As with all food assistance programmes, those established in support of a DDR process shall be gender-responsive and appropriate to the rights and specific needs of women and girls (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). A gender-transformative approach to food assistance shall be applied, promoting women\u2019s roles in decision-making, leadership, distribution, and monitoring and evaluation. More specifically: \n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles. \n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.). The transfer type and delivery mechanism shall not reinforce discriminatory and restrictive gender roles. \n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring. \n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups. \n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings. \n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed. These mechanisms shall ensure that women have a safe space to report protection issues and incidents of sexual and gender-based violence. An accountability system should be designed, established and managed to ensure appropriate follow up. \n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process. Opportunities for women to take a more active role in designing and implementing food assistance programmes shall also be promoted. \n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points. \n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -170839,7 +170839,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2738, - "Paragraph": "The food assistance component of a DDR process shall also consider gender analysis and power dynamics in household resource distribution, as it may be necessary to create specific benefit tracks for women. As with all food assistance programmes, those established in support of a DDR process shall be gender-responsive and appropriate to the rights and specific needs of women and girls (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). A gender-transformative approach to food assistance shall be applied, promoting women\u2019s roles in decision-making, leadership, distribution, and monitoring and evaluation. More specifically: \\n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles. \\n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.). The transfer type and delivery mechanism shall not reinforce discriminatory and restrictive gender roles. \\n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring. \\n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups. \\n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings. \\n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed. These mechanisms shall ensure that women have a safe space to report protection issues and incidents of sexual and gender-based violence. An accountability system should be designed, established and managed to ensure appropriate follow up. \\n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process. Opportunities for women to take a more active role in designing and implementing food assistance programmes shall also be promoted. \\n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points. \\n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", + "Paragraph": "The food assistance component of a DDR process shall also consider gender analysis and power dynamics in household resource distribution, as it may be necessary to create specific benefit tracks for women. As with all food assistance programmes, those established in support of a DDR process shall be gender-responsive and appropriate to the rights and specific needs of women and girls (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). A gender-transformative approach to food assistance shall be applied, promoting women\u2019s roles in decision-making, leadership, distribution, and monitoring and evaluation. More specifically: \n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles. \n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.). The transfer type and delivery mechanism shall not reinforce discriminatory and restrictive gender roles. \n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring. \n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups. \n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings. \n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed. These mechanisms shall ensure that women have a safe space to report protection issues and incidents of sexual and gender-based violence. An accountability system should be designed, established and managed to ensure appropriate follow up. \n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process. Opportunities for women to take a more active role in designing and implementing food assistance programmes shall also be promoted. \n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points. \n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -170857,7 +170857,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2738, - "Paragraph": "The food assistance component of a DDR process shall also consider gender analysis and power dynamics in household resource distribution, as it may be necessary to create specific benefit tracks for women. As with all food assistance programmes, those established in support of a DDR process shall be gender-responsive and appropriate to the rights and specific needs of women and girls (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). A gender-transformative approach to food assistance shall be applied, promoting women\u2019s roles in decision-making, leadership, distribution, and monitoring and evaluation. More specifically: \\n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles. \\n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.). The transfer type and delivery mechanism shall not reinforce discriminatory and restrictive gender roles. \\n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring. \\n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups. \\n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings. \\n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed. These mechanisms shall ensure that women have a safe space to report protection issues and incidents of sexual and gender-based violence. An accountability system should be designed, established and managed to ensure appropriate follow up. \\n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process. Opportunities for women to take a more active role in designing and implementing food assistance programmes shall also be promoted. \\n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points. \\n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", + "Paragraph": "The food assistance component of a DDR process shall also consider gender analysis and power dynamics in household resource distribution, as it may be necessary to create specific benefit tracks for women. As with all food assistance programmes, those established in support of a DDR process shall be gender-responsive and appropriate to the rights and specific needs of women and girls (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). A gender-transformative approach to food assistance shall be applied, promoting women\u2019s roles in decision-making, leadership, distribution, and monitoring and evaluation. More specifically: \n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles. \n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.). The transfer type and delivery mechanism shall not reinforce discriminatory and restrictive gender roles. \n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring. \n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups. \n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings. \n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed. These mechanisms shall ensure that women have a safe space to report protection issues and incidents of sexual and gender-based violence. An accountability system should be designed, established and managed to ensure appropriate follow up. \n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process. Opportunities for women to take a more active role in designing and implementing food assistance programmes shall also be promoted. \n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points. \n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -170868,14 +170868,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.3 Gender responsive and inclusive", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process.", + "Sentence": "\n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process.", "newParagraph": "food assistance component ddr process shall also consider gender analysis power dynamic household resource distribution may necessary create specific benefit track woman food assistance programme established support ddr process shall genderresponsive appropriate right specific need woman girl see iddrs 510 woman gender ddr gendertransformative approach food assistance shall applied promoting woman role decisionmaking leadership distribution monitoring evaluation specifically n gendertransformative lens shall integrated design delivery food assistance component leveraging opportunity support genderequitable engagement men woman boy girl including ensuring equal representation woman leadership role n woman men recipient food assistance shall determine selection transfer modality delivery mechanism time date place quantity food separate queue etc transfer type delivery mechanism shall reinforce discriminatory restrictive gender role n provision food assistance shall monitored gender genderequality consideration shall integrated tool procedure reporting onsite post distribution market monitoring n change food security nutrition situation decisionmaking authority empowerment equitable participation access protection safety issue satisfaction assistance received shall monitored individual woman men girl boy household community group n food assistance staff shall receive training protection sexual exploitation abuse psea including regular refresher training n confidential complaint feedback mechanism related food assistance accessible woman men girl boy shall designed established managed mechanism shall ensure woman safe space report protection issue incident sexual genderbased violence accountability system designed established managed ensure appropriate follow n possible violation woman girl right shall identified addressed responded supporting food assistance component ddr process opportunity woman take active role designing implementing food assistance programme shall also promoted n equal representation woman men peace mediation decisionmaking level stage humanitarian assistance shall ensured including food management committee distribution point n participation woman organization capacitybuilding humanitarian response rehabilitation recovery shall ensured", "ProcessedSent": "n possible violation woman girl right shall identified addressed responded supporting food assistance component ddr process", "SentID": 9492 }, { "ParagraphID": 2738, - "Paragraph": "The food assistance component of a DDR process shall also consider gender analysis and power dynamics in household resource distribution, as it may be necessary to create specific benefit tracks for women. As with all food assistance programmes, those established in support of a DDR process shall be gender-responsive and appropriate to the rights and specific needs of women and girls (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). A gender-transformative approach to food assistance shall be applied, promoting women\u2019s roles in decision-making, leadership, distribution, and monitoring and evaluation. More specifically: \\n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles. \\n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.). The transfer type and delivery mechanism shall not reinforce discriminatory and restrictive gender roles. \\n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring. \\n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups. \\n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings. \\n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed. These mechanisms shall ensure that women have a safe space to report protection issues and incidents of sexual and gender-based violence. An accountability system should be designed, established and managed to ensure appropriate follow up. \\n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process. Opportunities for women to take a more active role in designing and implementing food assistance programmes shall also be promoted. \\n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points. \\n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", + "Paragraph": "The food assistance component of a DDR process shall also consider gender analysis and power dynamics in household resource distribution, as it may be necessary to create specific benefit tracks for women. As with all food assistance programmes, those established in support of a DDR process shall be gender-responsive and appropriate to the rights and specific needs of women and girls (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). A gender-transformative approach to food assistance shall be applied, promoting women\u2019s roles in decision-making, leadership, distribution, and monitoring and evaluation. More specifically: \n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles. \n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.). The transfer type and delivery mechanism shall not reinforce discriminatory and restrictive gender roles. \n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring. \n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups. \n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings. \n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed. These mechanisms shall ensure that women have a safe space to report protection issues and incidents of sexual and gender-based violence. An accountability system should be designed, established and managed to ensure appropriate follow up. \n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process. Opportunities for women to take a more active role in designing and implementing food assistance programmes shall also be promoted. \n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points. \n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -170893,7 +170893,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2738, - "Paragraph": "The food assistance component of a DDR process shall also consider gender analysis and power dynamics in household resource distribution, as it may be necessary to create specific benefit tracks for women. As with all food assistance programmes, those established in support of a DDR process shall be gender-responsive and appropriate to the rights and specific needs of women and girls (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). A gender-transformative approach to food assistance shall be applied, promoting women\u2019s roles in decision-making, leadership, distribution, and monitoring and evaluation. More specifically: \\n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles. \\n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.). The transfer type and delivery mechanism shall not reinforce discriminatory and restrictive gender roles. \\n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring. \\n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups. \\n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings. \\n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed. These mechanisms shall ensure that women have a safe space to report protection issues and incidents of sexual and gender-based violence. An accountability system should be designed, established and managed to ensure appropriate follow up. \\n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process. Opportunities for women to take a more active role in designing and implementing food assistance programmes shall also be promoted. \\n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points. \\n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", + "Paragraph": "The food assistance component of a DDR process shall also consider gender analysis and power dynamics in household resource distribution, as it may be necessary to create specific benefit tracks for women. As with all food assistance programmes, those established in support of a DDR process shall be gender-responsive and appropriate to the rights and specific needs of women and girls (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). A gender-transformative approach to food assistance shall be applied, promoting women\u2019s roles in decision-making, leadership, distribution, and monitoring and evaluation. More specifically: \n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles. \n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.). The transfer type and delivery mechanism shall not reinforce discriminatory and restrictive gender roles. \n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring. \n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups. \n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings. \n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed. These mechanisms shall ensure that women have a safe space to report protection issues and incidents of sexual and gender-based violence. An accountability system should be designed, established and managed to ensure appropriate follow up. \n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process. Opportunities for women to take a more active role in designing and implementing food assistance programmes shall also be promoted. \n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points. \n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -170904,14 +170904,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.3 Gender responsive and inclusive", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points.", + "Sentence": "\n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points.", "newParagraph": "food assistance component ddr process shall also consider gender analysis power dynamic household resource distribution may necessary create specific benefit track woman food assistance programme established support ddr process shall genderresponsive appropriate right specific need woman girl see iddrs 510 woman gender ddr gendertransformative approach food assistance shall applied promoting woman role decisionmaking leadership distribution monitoring evaluation specifically n gendertransformative lens shall integrated design delivery food assistance component leveraging opportunity support genderequitable engagement men woman boy girl including ensuring equal representation woman leadership role n woman men recipient food assistance shall determine selection transfer modality delivery mechanism time date place quantity food separate queue etc transfer type delivery mechanism shall reinforce discriminatory restrictive gender role n provision food assistance shall monitored gender genderequality consideration shall integrated tool procedure reporting onsite post distribution market monitoring n change food security nutrition situation decisionmaking authority empowerment equitable participation access protection safety issue satisfaction assistance received shall monitored individual woman men girl boy household community group n food assistance staff shall receive training protection sexual exploitation abuse psea including regular refresher training n confidential complaint feedback mechanism related food assistance accessible woman men girl boy shall designed established managed mechanism shall ensure woman safe space report protection issue incident sexual genderbased violence accountability system designed established managed ensure appropriate follow n possible violation woman girl right shall identified addressed responded supporting food assistance component ddr process opportunity woman take active role designing implementing food assistance programme shall also promoted n equal representation woman men peace mediation decisionmaking level stage humanitarian assistance shall ensured including food management committee distribution point n participation woman organization capacitybuilding humanitarian response rehabilitation recovery shall ensured", "ProcessedSent": "n equal representation woman men peace mediation decisionmaking level stage humanitarian assistance shall ensured including food management committee distribution point", "SentID": 9494 }, { "ParagraphID": 2738, - "Paragraph": "The food assistance component of a DDR process shall also consider gender analysis and power dynamics in household resource distribution, as it may be necessary to create specific benefit tracks for women. As with all food assistance programmes, those established in support of a DDR process shall be gender-responsive and appropriate to the rights and specific needs of women and girls (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). A gender-transformative approach to food assistance shall be applied, promoting women\u2019s roles in decision-making, leadership, distribution, and monitoring and evaluation. More specifically: \\n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles. \\n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.). The transfer type and delivery mechanism shall not reinforce discriminatory and restrictive gender roles. \\n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring. \\n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups. \\n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings. \\n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed. These mechanisms shall ensure that women have a safe space to report protection issues and incidents of sexual and gender-based violence. An accountability system should be designed, established and managed to ensure appropriate follow up. \\n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process. Opportunities for women to take a more active role in designing and implementing food assistance programmes shall also be promoted. \\n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points. \\n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", + "Paragraph": "The food assistance component of a DDR process shall also consider gender analysis and power dynamics in household resource distribution, as it may be necessary to create specific benefit tracks for women. As with all food assistance programmes, those established in support of a DDR process shall be gender-responsive and appropriate to the rights and specific needs of women and girls (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR). A gender-transformative approach to food assistance shall be applied, promoting women\u2019s roles in decision-making, leadership, distribution, and monitoring and evaluation. More specifically: \n A gender-transformative lens shall be integrated into the design and delivery of food assistance components, leveraging opportunities to support gender-equitable engagement by men, women, boys and girls, including ensuring equal representation of women in leadership roles. \n The women and men who are to be recipients of food assistance shall determine the selection of the transfer modality and delivery mechanism (time, date, place, quantity of food, separate queues, etc.). The transfer type and delivery mechanism shall not reinforce discriminatory and restrictive gender roles. \n The provision of food assistance shall be monitored, and gender and gender-equality considerations shall be integrated into the tools, procedures and reporting of on-site, post- distribution and market monitoring. \n Changes in food security, nutrition situation, decision-making authority and empowerment, equitable participation and access, protection and safety issues, and satisfaction with assistance received shall be monitored for individual women, men, girls and boys, households and community groups. \n Food assistance staff shall receive training on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA), including regular refresher trainings. \n Confidential complaints and feedback mechanisms related to food assistance that are accessible to women, men, girls and boys shall be designed, established and managed. These mechanisms shall ensure that women have a safe space to report protection issues and incidents of sexual and gender-based violence. An accountability system should be designed, established and managed to ensure appropriate follow up. \n Possible violations of women\u2019s and girls\u2019 rights shall be identified, addressed and responded to when supporting the food assistance component of a DDR process. Opportunities for women to take a more active role in designing and implementing food assistance programmes shall also be promoted. \n The equal representation of women and men in peace mediation and decision-making at all levels and stages of humanitarian assistance shall be ensured, including in food management committees and at distribution points. \n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -170922,14 +170922,14 @@ "Heading2": "4.3 Gender responsive and inclusive", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", + "Sentence": "\n The participation of women\u2019s organizations in capacity-building for humanitarian response, rehabilitation and recovery shall be ensured.", "newParagraph": "food assistance component ddr process shall also consider gender analysis power dynamic household resource distribution may necessary create specific benefit track woman food assistance programme established support ddr process shall genderresponsive appropriate right specific need woman girl see iddrs 510 woman gender ddr gendertransformative approach food assistance shall applied promoting woman role decisionmaking leadership distribution monitoring evaluation specifically n gendertransformative lens shall integrated design delivery food assistance component leveraging opportunity support genderequitable engagement men woman boy girl including ensuring equal representation woman leadership role n woman men recipient food assistance shall determine selection transfer modality delivery mechanism time date place quantity food separate queue etc transfer type delivery mechanism shall reinforce discriminatory restrictive gender role n provision food assistance shall monitored gender genderequality consideration shall integrated tool procedure reporting onsite post distribution market monitoring n change food security nutrition situation decisionmaking authority empowerment equitable participation access protection safety issue satisfaction assistance received shall monitored individual woman men girl boy household community group n food assistance staff shall receive training protection sexual exploitation abuse psea including regular refresher training n confidential complaint feedback mechanism related food assistance accessible woman men girl boy shall designed established managed mechanism shall ensure woman safe space report protection issue incident sexual genderbased violence accountability system designed established managed ensure appropriate follow n possible violation woman girl right shall identified addressed responded supporting food assistance component ddr process opportunity woman take active role designing implementing food assistance programme shall also promoted n equal representation woman men peace mediation decisionmaking level stage humanitarian assistance shall ensured including food management committee distribution point n participation woman organization capacitybuilding humanitarian response rehabilitation recovery shall ensured", "ProcessedSent": "n participation woman organization capacitybuilding humanitarian response rehabilitation recovery shall ensured", "SentID": 9495 }, { "ParagraphID": 2739, - "Paragraph": "DDR processes shall be designed through a conflict-sensitive lens with careful consideration given to how a possible food assistance component could potentially increase tensions and vulnerabilities. Food assistance provided as part of a DDR process shall not create, exacerbate or contribute to gender inequalities or discrimination, including the risk of gender-based violence. Furthermore, it shall not present possibilities for theft or manipulation of assistance, or compromise the legitimacy of organizations and actors providing humanitarian and development aid. The most adequate transfer modalities and delivery mechanisms for food assistance as part of a DDR process shall be identified. Food assistance staff and DDR practitioners shall be highly aware of the potential for their decisions to have unintended negative consequences and shall analyse possible inadvertent contributions to tension\/conflict. This analysis shall include: \\n a) Having a sound understanding of the social tensions that already exist; \\n b) Assessing how the DDR process and the food assistance component may interact with those tensions; \\n c) Adapting the DDR process and the food assistance component to avoid contributing to tension\/conflict, and to support sustainable peace where possible.", + "Paragraph": "DDR processes shall be designed through a conflict-sensitive lens with careful consideration given to how a possible food assistance component could potentially increase tensions and vulnerabilities. Food assistance provided as part of a DDR process shall not create, exacerbate or contribute to gender inequalities or discrimination, including the risk of gender-based violence. Furthermore, it shall not present possibilities for theft or manipulation of assistance, or compromise the legitimacy of organizations and actors providing humanitarian and development aid. The most adequate transfer modalities and delivery mechanisms for food assistance as part of a DDR process shall be identified. Food assistance staff and DDR practitioners shall be highly aware of the potential for their decisions to have unintended negative consequences and shall analyse possible inadvertent contributions to tension\/conflict. This analysis shall include: \n a) Having a sound understanding of the social tensions that already exist; \n b) Assessing how the DDR process and the food assistance component may interact with those tensions; \n c) Adapting the DDR process and the food assistance component to avoid contributing to tension\/conflict, and to support sustainable peace where possible.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -170947,7 +170947,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2739, - "Paragraph": "DDR processes shall be designed through a conflict-sensitive lens with careful consideration given to how a possible food assistance component could potentially increase tensions and vulnerabilities. Food assistance provided as part of a DDR process shall not create, exacerbate or contribute to gender inequalities or discrimination, including the risk of gender-based violence. Furthermore, it shall not present possibilities for theft or manipulation of assistance, or compromise the legitimacy of organizations and actors providing humanitarian and development aid. The most adequate transfer modalities and delivery mechanisms for food assistance as part of a DDR process shall be identified. Food assistance staff and DDR practitioners shall be highly aware of the potential for their decisions to have unintended negative consequences and shall analyse possible inadvertent contributions to tension\/conflict. This analysis shall include: \\n a) Having a sound understanding of the social tensions that already exist; \\n b) Assessing how the DDR process and the food assistance component may interact with those tensions; \\n c) Adapting the DDR process and the food assistance component to avoid contributing to tension\/conflict, and to support sustainable peace where possible.", + "Paragraph": "DDR processes shall be designed through a conflict-sensitive lens with careful consideration given to how a possible food assistance component could potentially increase tensions and vulnerabilities. Food assistance provided as part of a DDR process shall not create, exacerbate or contribute to gender inequalities or discrimination, including the risk of gender-based violence. Furthermore, it shall not present possibilities for theft or manipulation of assistance, or compromise the legitimacy of organizations and actors providing humanitarian and development aid. The most adequate transfer modalities and delivery mechanisms for food assistance as part of a DDR process shall be identified. Food assistance staff and DDR practitioners shall be highly aware of the potential for their decisions to have unintended negative consequences and shall analyse possible inadvertent contributions to tension\/conflict. This analysis shall include: \n a) Having a sound understanding of the social tensions that already exist; \n b) Assessing how the DDR process and the food assistance component may interact with those tensions; \n c) Adapting the DDR process and the food assistance component to avoid contributing to tension\/conflict, and to support sustainable peace where possible.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -170965,7 +170965,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2739, - "Paragraph": "DDR processes shall be designed through a conflict-sensitive lens with careful consideration given to how a possible food assistance component could potentially increase tensions and vulnerabilities. Food assistance provided as part of a DDR process shall not create, exacerbate or contribute to gender inequalities or discrimination, including the risk of gender-based violence. Furthermore, it shall not present possibilities for theft or manipulation of assistance, or compromise the legitimacy of organizations and actors providing humanitarian and development aid. The most adequate transfer modalities and delivery mechanisms for food assistance as part of a DDR process shall be identified. Food assistance staff and DDR practitioners shall be highly aware of the potential for their decisions to have unintended negative consequences and shall analyse possible inadvertent contributions to tension\/conflict. This analysis shall include: \\n a) Having a sound understanding of the social tensions that already exist; \\n b) Assessing how the DDR process and the food assistance component may interact with those tensions; \\n c) Adapting the DDR process and the food assistance component to avoid contributing to tension\/conflict, and to support sustainable peace where possible.", + "Paragraph": "DDR processes shall be designed through a conflict-sensitive lens with careful consideration given to how a possible food assistance component could potentially increase tensions and vulnerabilities. Food assistance provided as part of a DDR process shall not create, exacerbate or contribute to gender inequalities or discrimination, including the risk of gender-based violence. Furthermore, it shall not present possibilities for theft or manipulation of assistance, or compromise the legitimacy of organizations and actors providing humanitarian and development aid. The most adequate transfer modalities and delivery mechanisms for food assistance as part of a DDR process shall be identified. Food assistance staff and DDR practitioners shall be highly aware of the potential for their decisions to have unintended negative consequences and shall analyse possible inadvertent contributions to tension\/conflict. This analysis shall include: \n a) Having a sound understanding of the social tensions that already exist; \n b) Assessing how the DDR process and the food assistance component may interact with those tensions; \n c) Adapting the DDR process and the food assistance component to avoid contributing to tension\/conflict, and to support sustainable peace where possible.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -170983,7 +170983,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2739, - "Paragraph": "DDR processes shall be designed through a conflict-sensitive lens with careful consideration given to how a possible food assistance component could potentially increase tensions and vulnerabilities. Food assistance provided as part of a DDR process shall not create, exacerbate or contribute to gender inequalities or discrimination, including the risk of gender-based violence. Furthermore, it shall not present possibilities for theft or manipulation of assistance, or compromise the legitimacy of organizations and actors providing humanitarian and development aid. The most adequate transfer modalities and delivery mechanisms for food assistance as part of a DDR process shall be identified. Food assistance staff and DDR practitioners shall be highly aware of the potential for their decisions to have unintended negative consequences and shall analyse possible inadvertent contributions to tension\/conflict. This analysis shall include: \\n a) Having a sound understanding of the social tensions that already exist; \\n b) Assessing how the DDR process and the food assistance component may interact with those tensions; \\n c) Adapting the DDR process and the food assistance component to avoid contributing to tension\/conflict, and to support sustainable peace where possible.", + "Paragraph": "DDR processes shall be designed through a conflict-sensitive lens with careful consideration given to how a possible food assistance component could potentially increase tensions and vulnerabilities. Food assistance provided as part of a DDR process shall not create, exacerbate or contribute to gender inequalities or discrimination, including the risk of gender-based violence. Furthermore, it shall not present possibilities for theft or manipulation of assistance, or compromise the legitimacy of organizations and actors providing humanitarian and development aid. The most adequate transfer modalities and delivery mechanisms for food assistance as part of a DDR process shall be identified. Food assistance staff and DDR practitioners shall be highly aware of the potential for their decisions to have unintended negative consequences and shall analyse possible inadvertent contributions to tension\/conflict. This analysis shall include: \n a) Having a sound understanding of the social tensions that already exist; \n b) Assessing how the DDR process and the food assistance component may interact with those tensions; \n c) Adapting the DDR process and the food assistance component to avoid contributing to tension\/conflict, and to support sustainable peace where possible.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -171001,7 +171001,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2739, - "Paragraph": "DDR processes shall be designed through a conflict-sensitive lens with careful consideration given to how a possible food assistance component could potentially increase tensions and vulnerabilities. Food assistance provided as part of a DDR process shall not create, exacerbate or contribute to gender inequalities or discrimination, including the risk of gender-based violence. Furthermore, it shall not present possibilities for theft or manipulation of assistance, or compromise the legitimacy of organizations and actors providing humanitarian and development aid. The most adequate transfer modalities and delivery mechanisms for food assistance as part of a DDR process shall be identified. Food assistance staff and DDR practitioners shall be highly aware of the potential for their decisions to have unintended negative consequences and shall analyse possible inadvertent contributions to tension\/conflict. This analysis shall include: \\n a) Having a sound understanding of the social tensions that already exist; \\n b) Assessing how the DDR process and the food assistance component may interact with those tensions; \\n c) Adapting the DDR process and the food assistance component to avoid contributing to tension\/conflict, and to support sustainable peace where possible.", + "Paragraph": "DDR processes shall be designed through a conflict-sensitive lens with careful consideration given to how a possible food assistance component could potentially increase tensions and vulnerabilities. Food assistance provided as part of a DDR process shall not create, exacerbate or contribute to gender inequalities or discrimination, including the risk of gender-based violence. Furthermore, it shall not present possibilities for theft or manipulation of assistance, or compromise the legitimacy of organizations and actors providing humanitarian and development aid. The most adequate transfer modalities and delivery mechanisms for food assistance as part of a DDR process shall be identified. Food assistance staff and DDR practitioners shall be highly aware of the potential for their decisions to have unintended negative consequences and shall analyse possible inadvertent contributions to tension\/conflict. This analysis shall include: \n a) Having a sound understanding of the social tensions that already exist; \n b) Assessing how the DDR process and the food assistance component may interact with those tensions; \n c) Adapting the DDR process and the food assistance component to avoid contributing to tension\/conflict, and to support sustainable peace where possible.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -171019,7 +171019,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2739, - "Paragraph": "DDR processes shall be designed through a conflict-sensitive lens with careful consideration given to how a possible food assistance component could potentially increase tensions and vulnerabilities. Food assistance provided as part of a DDR process shall not create, exacerbate or contribute to gender inequalities or discrimination, including the risk of gender-based violence. Furthermore, it shall not present possibilities for theft or manipulation of assistance, or compromise the legitimacy of organizations and actors providing humanitarian and development aid. The most adequate transfer modalities and delivery mechanisms for food assistance as part of a DDR process shall be identified. Food assistance staff and DDR practitioners shall be highly aware of the potential for their decisions to have unintended negative consequences and shall analyse possible inadvertent contributions to tension\/conflict. This analysis shall include: \\n a) Having a sound understanding of the social tensions that already exist; \\n b) Assessing how the DDR process and the food assistance component may interact with those tensions; \\n c) Adapting the DDR process and the food assistance component to avoid contributing to tension\/conflict, and to support sustainable peace where possible.", + "Paragraph": "DDR processes shall be designed through a conflict-sensitive lens with careful consideration given to how a possible food assistance component could potentially increase tensions and vulnerabilities. Food assistance provided as part of a DDR process shall not create, exacerbate or contribute to gender inequalities or discrimination, including the risk of gender-based violence. Furthermore, it shall not present possibilities for theft or manipulation of assistance, or compromise the legitimacy of organizations and actors providing humanitarian and development aid. The most adequate transfer modalities and delivery mechanisms for food assistance as part of a DDR process shall be identified. Food assistance staff and DDR practitioners shall be highly aware of the potential for their decisions to have unintended negative consequences and shall analyse possible inadvertent contributions to tension\/conflict. This analysis shall include: \n a) Having a sound understanding of the social tensions that already exist; \n b) Assessing how the DDR process and the food assistance component may interact with those tensions; \n c) Adapting the DDR process and the food assistance component to avoid contributing to tension\/conflict, and to support sustainable peace where possible.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -171030,7 +171030,7 @@ "Heading2": "4.4 Conflict sensitive", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This analysis shall include: \\n a) Having a sound understanding of the social tensions that already exist; \\n b) Assessing how the DDR process and the food assistance component may interact with those tensions; \\n c) Adapting the DDR process and the food assistance component to avoid contributing to tension\/conflict, and to support sustainable peace where possible.", + "Sentence": "This analysis shall include: \n a) Having a sound understanding of the social tensions that already exist; \n b) Assessing how the DDR process and the food assistance component may interact with those tensions; \n c) Adapting the DDR process and the food assistance component to avoid contributing to tension\/conflict, and to support sustainable peace where possible.", "newParagraph": "ddr process shall designed conflictsensitive lens careful consideration given possible food assistance component could potentially increase tension vulnerability food assistance provided part ddr process shall create exacerbate contribute gender inequality discrimination including risk genderbased violence furthermore shall present possibility theft manipulation assistance compromise legitimacy organization actor providing humanitarian development aid adequate transfer modality delivery mechanism food assistance part ddr process shall identified food assistance staff ddr practitioner shall highly aware potential decision unintended negative consequence shall analyse possible inadvertent contribution tensionconflict analysis shall include n sound understanding social tension already exist n b assessing ddr process food assistance component may interact tension n c adapting ddr process food assistance component avoid contributing tensionconflict support sustainable peace possible", "ProcessedSent": "analysis shall include n sound understanding social tension already exist n b assessing ddr process food assistance component may interact tension n c adapting ddr process food assistance component avoid contributing tensionconflict support sustainable peace possible", "SentID": 9501 @@ -171829,7 +171829,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2754, - "Paragraph": "The tools available for assessment and analysis include: \\n Crop and food security assessment mission; \\n Emergency food security assessments; \\n Mobile vulnerability analysis and mapping remote surveys; \\n Essential needs assessments; \\n Integrated food security phase classification exercises including acute malnutrition; \\n Food security monitoring systems; \\n Transfer modality selection guidance; \\n Standardized Monitoring and Assessment of Relief and Transition (SMART) nutrition surveys or joint food security and nutrition assessments; \\n Other types of rapid assessments to identify vulnerable communities and to better understand local food management practices. Rapid assessments use a variety of quick and inexpensive survey techniques. They tend to be qualitative rather than quantitative, and they depend more on the ability and judgement of the person carrying out the survey than do other research methods that are more rigorous, but also slower and costlier.", + "Paragraph": "The tools available for assessment and analysis include: \n Crop and food security assessment mission; \n Emergency food security assessments; \n Mobile vulnerability analysis and mapping remote surveys; \n Essential needs assessments; \n Integrated food security phase classification exercises including acute malnutrition; \n Food security monitoring systems; \n Transfer modality selection guidance; \n Standardized Monitoring and Assessment of Relief and Transition (SMART) nutrition surveys or joint food security and nutrition assessments; \n Other types of rapid assessments to identify vulnerable communities and to better understand local food management practices. Rapid assessments use a variety of quick and inexpensive survey techniques. They tend to be qualitative rather than quantitative, and they depend more on the ability and judgement of the person carrying out the survey than do other research methods that are more rigorous, but also slower and costlier.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -171840,14 +171840,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Food assistance planning data", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The tools available for assessment and analysis include: \\n Crop and food security assessment mission; \\n Emergency food security assessments; \\n Mobile vulnerability analysis and mapping remote surveys; \\n Essential needs assessments; \\n Integrated food security phase classification exercises including acute malnutrition; \\n Food security monitoring systems; \\n Transfer modality selection guidance; \\n Standardized Monitoring and Assessment of Relief and Transition (SMART) nutrition surveys or joint food security and nutrition assessments; \\n Other types of rapid assessments to identify vulnerable communities and to better understand local food management practices.", + "Sentence": "The tools available for assessment and analysis include: \n Crop and food security assessment mission; \n Emergency food security assessments; \n Mobile vulnerability analysis and mapping remote surveys; \n Essential needs assessments; \n Integrated food security phase classification exercises including acute malnutrition; \n Food security monitoring systems; \n Transfer modality selection guidance; \n Standardized Monitoring and Assessment of Relief and Transition (SMART) nutrition surveys or joint food security and nutrition assessments; \n Other types of rapid assessments to identify vulnerable communities and to better understand local food management practices.", "newParagraph": "tool available assessment analysis include n crop food security assessment mission n emergency food security assessment n mobile vulnerability analysis mapping remote survey n essential need assessment n integrated food security phase classification exercise including acute malnutrition n food security monitoring system n transfer modality selection guidance n standardized monitoring assessment relief transition smart nutrition survey joint food security nutrition assessment n type rapid assessment identify vulnerable community better understand local food management practice rapid assessment use variety quick inexpensive survey technique tend qualitative rather quantitative depend ability judgement person carrying survey research method rigorous also slower costlier", "ProcessedSent": "tool available assessment analysis include n crop food security assessment mission n emergency food security assessment n mobile vulnerability analysis mapping remote survey n essential need assessment n integrated food security phase classification exercise including acute malnutrition n food security monitoring system n transfer modality selection guidance n standardized monitoring assessment relief transition smart nutrition survey joint food security nutrition assessment n type rapid assessment identify vulnerable community better understand local food management practice", "SentID": 9546 }, { "ParagraphID": 2754, - "Paragraph": "The tools available for assessment and analysis include: \\n Crop and food security assessment mission; \\n Emergency food security assessments; \\n Mobile vulnerability analysis and mapping remote surveys; \\n Essential needs assessments; \\n Integrated food security phase classification exercises including acute malnutrition; \\n Food security monitoring systems; \\n Transfer modality selection guidance; \\n Standardized Monitoring and Assessment of Relief and Transition (SMART) nutrition surveys or joint food security and nutrition assessments; \\n Other types of rapid assessments to identify vulnerable communities and to better understand local food management practices. Rapid assessments use a variety of quick and inexpensive survey techniques. They tend to be qualitative rather than quantitative, and they depend more on the ability and judgement of the person carrying out the survey than do other research methods that are more rigorous, but also slower and costlier.", + "Paragraph": "The tools available for assessment and analysis include: \n Crop and food security assessment mission; \n Emergency food security assessments; \n Mobile vulnerability analysis and mapping remote surveys; \n Essential needs assessments; \n Integrated food security phase classification exercises including acute malnutrition; \n Food security monitoring systems; \n Transfer modality selection guidance; \n Standardized Monitoring and Assessment of Relief and Transition (SMART) nutrition surveys or joint food security and nutrition assessments; \n Other types of rapid assessments to identify vulnerable communities and to better understand local food management practices. Rapid assessments use a variety of quick and inexpensive survey techniques. They tend to be qualitative rather than quantitative, and they depend more on the ability and judgement of the person carrying out the survey than do other research methods that are more rigorous, but also slower and costlier.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -171865,7 +171865,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2754, - "Paragraph": "The tools available for assessment and analysis include: \\n Crop and food security assessment mission; \\n Emergency food security assessments; \\n Mobile vulnerability analysis and mapping remote surveys; \\n Essential needs assessments; \\n Integrated food security phase classification exercises including acute malnutrition; \\n Food security monitoring systems; \\n Transfer modality selection guidance; \\n Standardized Monitoring and Assessment of Relief and Transition (SMART) nutrition surveys or joint food security and nutrition assessments; \\n Other types of rapid assessments to identify vulnerable communities and to better understand local food management practices. Rapid assessments use a variety of quick and inexpensive survey techniques. They tend to be qualitative rather than quantitative, and they depend more on the ability and judgement of the person carrying out the survey than do other research methods that are more rigorous, but also slower and costlier.", + "Paragraph": "The tools available for assessment and analysis include: \n Crop and food security assessment mission; \n Emergency food security assessments; \n Mobile vulnerability analysis and mapping remote surveys; \n Essential needs assessments; \n Integrated food security phase classification exercises including acute malnutrition; \n Food security monitoring systems; \n Transfer modality selection guidance; \n Standardized Monitoring and Assessment of Relief and Transition (SMART) nutrition surveys or joint food security and nutrition assessments; \n Other types of rapid assessments to identify vulnerable communities and to better understand local food management practices. Rapid assessments use a variety of quick and inexpensive survey techniques. They tend to be qualitative rather than quantitative, and they depend more on the ability and judgement of the person carrying out the survey than do other research methods that are more rigorous, but also slower and costlier.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -172063,7 +172063,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2758, - "Paragraph": "The following data are essential for food assistance planning as part of a DDR process, and shall be provided to, or collected by, the lead agency at the earliest possible stages of planning, ensuring that data protection standards are respected: \\n Numbers of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups (disaggregated by sex and age, and with specific assessments of the numbers and characteristics of vulnerable groups); \\n Numbers of dependants (partners, children, relatives, disaggregated by sex and age) and their expenditure on food and food intake; \\n Profiles of participants and beneficiaries (i.e., who they are, what their special needs are); \\n Basic nutritional data, by sex and age; \\n Logistics corridors\/supply routes; \\n Roads and infrastructure information; \\n Information on market capacity and functionality; \\n Information on financial service provider networks; \\n Basic information on beneficiary expenditure\/consumption behaviour; \\n Information regarding demining; \\n Other security-related information.", + "Paragraph": "The following data are essential for food assistance planning as part of a DDR process, and shall be provided to, or collected by, the lead agency at the earliest possible stages of planning, ensuring that data protection standards are respected: \n Numbers of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups (disaggregated by sex and age, and with specific assessments of the numbers and characteristics of vulnerable groups); \n Numbers of dependants (partners, children, relatives, disaggregated by sex and age) and their expenditure on food and food intake; \n Profiles of participants and beneficiaries (i.e., who they are, what their special needs are); \n Basic nutritional data, by sex and age; \n Logistics corridors\/supply routes; \n Roads and infrastructure information; \n Information on market capacity and functionality; \n Information on financial service provider networks; \n Basic information on beneficiary expenditure\/consumption behaviour; \n Information regarding demining; \n Other security-related information.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -172074,7 +172074,7 @@ "Heading2": "5.1 Food assistance planning data", "Heading3": "5.1.1 Data needed for planning", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The following data are essential for food assistance planning as part of a DDR process, and shall be provided to, or collected by, the lead agency at the earliest possible stages of planning, ensuring that data protection standards are respected: \\n Numbers of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups (disaggregated by sex and age, and with specific assessments of the numbers and characteristics of vulnerable groups); \\n Numbers of dependants (partners, children, relatives, disaggregated by sex and age) and their expenditure on food and food intake; \\n Profiles of participants and beneficiaries (i.e., who they are, what their special needs are); \\n Basic nutritional data, by sex and age; \\n Logistics corridors\/supply routes; \\n Roads and infrastructure information; \\n Information on market capacity and functionality; \\n Information on financial service provider networks; \\n Basic information on beneficiary expenditure\/consumption behaviour; \\n Information regarding demining; \\n Other security-related information.", + "Sentence": "The following data are essential for food assistance planning as part of a DDR process, and shall be provided to, or collected by, the lead agency at the earliest possible stages of planning, ensuring that data protection standards are respected: \n Numbers of ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups (disaggregated by sex and age, and with specific assessments of the numbers and characteristics of vulnerable groups); \n Numbers of dependants (partners, children, relatives, disaggregated by sex and age) and their expenditure on food and food intake; \n Profiles of participants and beneficiaries (i.e., who they are, what their special needs are); \n Basic nutritional data, by sex and age; \n Logistics corridors\/supply routes; \n Roads and infrastructure information; \n Information on market capacity and functionality; \n Information on financial service provider networks; \n Basic information on beneficiary expenditure\/consumption behaviour; \n Information regarding demining; \n Other security-related information.", "newParagraph": "following data essential food assistance planning part ddr process shall provided collected lead agency earliest possible stage planning ensuring data protection standard respected n number excombatants person formerly associated armed force group disaggregated sex age specific assessment number characteristic vulnerable group n number dependant partner child relative disaggregated sex age expenditure food food intake n profile participant beneficiary ie special need n basic nutritional data sex age n logistics corridorssupply route n road infrastructure information n information market capacity functionality n information financial service provider network n basic information beneficiary expenditureconsumption behaviour n information regarding demining n securityrelated information", "ProcessedSent": "following data essential food assistance planning part ddr process shall provided collected lead agency earliest possible stage planning ensuring data protection standard respected n number excombatants person formerly associated armed force group disaggregated sex age specific assessment number characteristic vulnerable group n number dependant partner child relative disaggregated sex age expenditure food food intake n profile participant beneficiary ie special need n basic nutritional data sex age n logistics corridorssupply route n road infrastructure information n information market capacity functionality n information financial service provider network n basic information beneficiary expenditureconsumption behaviour n information regarding demining n securityrelated information", "SentID": 9559 @@ -172171,7 +172171,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2761, - "Paragraph": "The following parts of the food assistance component should be finalized in a food assistance plan and made part of the inter-agency approach to the DDR process: \\n Context\/conflict analysis, including protection and gender analysis; \\n Agreement on ration\/food basket\/transfer value for assembly and reinsertion periods, taking into account the diverse needs of recipients; \\n Agreement on the most appropriate modality (i.e., in-kind food, cash, or voucher\/e-voucher); \\n The identification of programme resources; \\n The establishment of viable distribution\/disbursement\/voucher redemption mechanisms, taking into consideration gender and protection issues; \\n Putting plans and resources in place for special feeding programmes (e.g., school\/interim care centre feeding, take home rations, malnutrition and prevention treatment programmes; integrating nutrition awareness education); \\n Preparations for special project activities (e.g., FFA, FFT, etc.); \\n The development of a logistics plan; \\n The establishment of monitoring and reporting systems; \\n The development of contingency plans; \\n The establishment of security measures.", + "Paragraph": "The following parts of the food assistance component should be finalized in a food assistance plan and made part of the inter-agency approach to the DDR process: \n Context\/conflict analysis, including protection and gender analysis; \n Agreement on ration\/food basket\/transfer value for assembly and reinsertion periods, taking into account the diverse needs of recipients; \n Agreement on the most appropriate modality (i.e., in-kind food, cash, or voucher\/e-voucher); \n The identification of programme resources; \n The establishment of viable distribution\/disbursement\/voucher redemption mechanisms, taking into consideration gender and protection issues; \n Putting plans and resources in place for special feeding programmes (e.g., school\/interim care centre feeding, take home rations, malnutrition and prevention treatment programmes; integrating nutrition awareness education); \n Preparations for special project activities (e.g., FFA, FFT, etc.); \n The development of a logistics plan; \n The establishment of monitoring and reporting systems; \n The development of contingency plans; \n The establishment of security measures.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -172182,14 +172182,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2 The food assistance plan", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The following parts of the food assistance component should be finalized in a food assistance plan and made part of the inter-agency approach to the DDR process: \\n Context\/conflict analysis, including protection and gender analysis; \\n Agreement on ration\/food basket\/transfer value for assembly and reinsertion periods, taking into account the diverse needs of recipients; \\n Agreement on the most appropriate modality (i.e., in-kind food, cash, or voucher\/e-voucher); \\n The identification of programme resources; \\n The establishment of viable distribution\/disbursement\/voucher redemption mechanisms, taking into consideration gender and protection issues; \\n Putting plans and resources in place for special feeding programmes (e.g., school\/interim care centre feeding, take home rations, malnutrition and prevention treatment programmes; integrating nutrition awareness education); \\n Preparations for special project activities (e.g., FFA, FFT, etc.", + "Sentence": "The following parts of the food assistance component should be finalized in a food assistance plan and made part of the inter-agency approach to the DDR process: \n Context\/conflict analysis, including protection and gender analysis; \n Agreement on ration\/food basket\/transfer value for assembly and reinsertion periods, taking into account the diverse needs of recipients; \n Agreement on the most appropriate modality (i.e., in-kind food, cash, or voucher\/e-voucher); \n The identification of programme resources; \n The establishment of viable distribution\/disbursement\/voucher redemption mechanisms, taking into consideration gender and protection issues; \n Putting plans and resources in place for special feeding programmes (e.g., school\/interim care centre feeding, take home rations, malnutrition and prevention treatment programmes; integrating nutrition awareness education); \n Preparations for special project activities (e.g., FFA, FFT, etc.", "newParagraph": "following part food assistance component finalized food assistance plan made part interagency approach ddr process n contextconflict analysis including protection gender analysis n agreement rationfood baskettransfer value assembly reinsertion period taking account diverse need recipient n agreement appropriate modality ie inkind food cash voucherevoucher n identification programme resource n establishment viable distributiondisbursementvoucher redemption mechanism taking consideration gender protection issue n putting plan resource place special feeding programme eg schoolinterim care centre feeding take home ration malnutrition prevention treatment programme integrating nutrition awareness education n preparation special project activity eg ffa fft etc n development logistics plan n establishment monitoring reporting system n development contingency plan n establishment security measure", "ProcessedSent": "following part food assistance component finalized food assistance plan made part interagency approach ddr process n contextconflict analysis including protection gender analysis n agreement rationfood baskettransfer value assembly reinsertion period taking account diverse need recipient n agreement appropriate modality ie inkind food cash voucherevoucher n identification programme resource n establishment viable distributiondisbursementvoucher redemption mechanism taking consideration gender protection issue n putting plan resource place special feeding programme eg schoolinterim care centre feeding take home ration malnutrition prevention treatment programme integrating nutrition awareness education n preparation special project activity eg ffa fft etc", "SentID": 9565 }, { "ParagraphID": 2761, - "Paragraph": "The following parts of the food assistance component should be finalized in a food assistance plan and made part of the inter-agency approach to the DDR process: \\n Context\/conflict analysis, including protection and gender analysis; \\n Agreement on ration\/food basket\/transfer value for assembly and reinsertion periods, taking into account the diverse needs of recipients; \\n Agreement on the most appropriate modality (i.e., in-kind food, cash, or voucher\/e-voucher); \\n The identification of programme resources; \\n The establishment of viable distribution\/disbursement\/voucher redemption mechanisms, taking into consideration gender and protection issues; \\n Putting plans and resources in place for special feeding programmes (e.g., school\/interim care centre feeding, take home rations, malnutrition and prevention treatment programmes; integrating nutrition awareness education); \\n Preparations for special project activities (e.g., FFA, FFT, etc.); \\n The development of a logistics plan; \\n The establishment of monitoring and reporting systems; \\n The development of contingency plans; \\n The establishment of security measures.", + "Paragraph": "The following parts of the food assistance component should be finalized in a food assistance plan and made part of the inter-agency approach to the DDR process: \n Context\/conflict analysis, including protection and gender analysis; \n Agreement on ration\/food basket\/transfer value for assembly and reinsertion periods, taking into account the diverse needs of recipients; \n Agreement on the most appropriate modality (i.e., in-kind food, cash, or voucher\/e-voucher); \n The identification of programme resources; \n The establishment of viable distribution\/disbursement\/voucher redemption mechanisms, taking into consideration gender and protection issues; \n Putting plans and resources in place for special feeding programmes (e.g., school\/interim care centre feeding, take home rations, malnutrition and prevention treatment programmes; integrating nutrition awareness education); \n Preparations for special project activities (e.g., FFA, FFT, etc.); \n The development of a logistics plan; \n The establishment of monitoring and reporting systems; \n The development of contingency plans; \n The establishment of security measures.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -172200,7 +172200,7 @@ "Heading2": "5.2 The food assistance plan", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "); \\n The development of a logistics plan; \\n The establishment of monitoring and reporting systems; \\n The development of contingency plans; \\n The establishment of security measures.", + "Sentence": "); \n The development of a logistics plan; \n The establishment of monitoring and reporting systems; \n The development of contingency plans; \n The establishment of security measures.", "newParagraph": "following part food assistance component finalized food assistance plan made part interagency approach ddr process n contextconflict analysis including protection gender analysis n agreement rationfood baskettransfer value assembly reinsertion period taking account diverse need recipient n agreement appropriate modality ie inkind food cash voucherevoucher n identification programme resource n establishment viable distributiondisbursementvoucher redemption mechanism taking consideration gender protection issue n putting plan resource place special feeding programme eg schoolinterim care centre feeding take home ration malnutrition prevention treatment programme integrating nutrition awareness education n preparation special project activity eg ffa fft etc n development logistics plan n establishment monitoring reporting system n development contingency plan n establishment security measure", "ProcessedSent": " n development logistics plan n establishment monitoring reporting system n development contingency plan n establishment security measure", "SentID": 9566 @@ -172891,7 +172891,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2771, - "Paragraph": "The primary logistical goal of the food assistance component of a DDR process is to deliver food supplies to the right place, at the right time and cost, in good condition and with no loss. The main elements of a logistics strategy should include: \\n Port(s) of entry \u2013 identifying the most appropriate unloading port with the best location, capacity and costs; \\n Identifying the location for\/of the warehouses in transit and recipient countries; \\n Identifying logistics corridors\/routes and means of transport. The logistics strategy should plan for the following: \\n Organizing transport; \\n Setting up and managing warehouses; \\n Identifying additional needs; \\n Special operations; \\n Recommended logistic arrangements; \\n Cost analysis.", + "Paragraph": "The primary logistical goal of the food assistance component of a DDR process is to deliver food supplies to the right place, at the right time and cost, in good condition and with no loss. The main elements of a logistics strategy should include: \n Port(s) of entry \u2013 identifying the most appropriate unloading port with the best location, capacity and costs; \n Identifying the location for\/of the warehouses in transit and recipient countries; \n Identifying logistics corridors\/routes and means of transport. The logistics strategy should plan for the following: \n Organizing transport; \n Setting up and managing warehouses; \n Identifying additional needs; \n Special operations; \n Recommended logistic arrangements; \n Cost analysis.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -172909,7 +172909,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2771, - "Paragraph": "The primary logistical goal of the food assistance component of a DDR process is to deliver food supplies to the right place, at the right time and cost, in good condition and with no loss. The main elements of a logistics strategy should include: \\n Port(s) of entry \u2013 identifying the most appropriate unloading port with the best location, capacity and costs; \\n Identifying the location for\/of the warehouses in transit and recipient countries; \\n Identifying logistics corridors\/routes and means of transport. The logistics strategy should plan for the following: \\n Organizing transport; \\n Setting up and managing warehouses; \\n Identifying additional needs; \\n Special operations; \\n Recommended logistic arrangements; \\n Cost analysis.", + "Paragraph": "The primary logistical goal of the food assistance component of a DDR process is to deliver food supplies to the right place, at the right time and cost, in good condition and with no loss. The main elements of a logistics strategy should include: \n Port(s) of entry \u2013 identifying the most appropriate unloading port with the best location, capacity and costs; \n Identifying the location for\/of the warehouses in transit and recipient countries; \n Identifying logistics corridors\/routes and means of transport. The logistics strategy should plan for the following: \n Organizing transport; \n Setting up and managing warehouses; \n Identifying additional needs; \n Special operations; \n Recommended logistic arrangements; \n Cost analysis.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -172920,14 +172920,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.6 In-kind food distribution", "Heading3": "5.6.1 Logistics strategy", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The main elements of a logistics strategy should include: \\n Port(s) of entry \u2013 identifying the most appropriate unloading port with the best location, capacity and costs; \\n Identifying the location for\/of the warehouses in transit and recipient countries; \\n Identifying logistics corridors\/routes and means of transport.", + "Sentence": "The main elements of a logistics strategy should include: \n Port(s) of entry \u2013 identifying the most appropriate unloading port with the best location, capacity and costs; \n Identifying the location for\/of the warehouses in transit and recipient countries; \n Identifying logistics corridors\/routes and means of transport.", "newParagraph": "primary logistical goal food assistance component ddr process deliver food supply right place right time cost good condition loss main element logistics strategy include n port entry identifying appropriate unloading port best location capacity cost n identifying location forof warehouse transit recipient country n identifying logistics corridorsroutes mean transport logistics strategy plan following n organizing transport n setting managing warehouse n identifying additional need n special operation n recommended logistic arrangement n cost analysis", "ProcessedSent": "main element logistics strategy include n port entry identifying appropriate unloading port best location capacity cost n identifying location forof warehouse transit recipient country n identifying logistics corridorsroutes mean transport", "SentID": 9606 }, { "ParagraphID": 2771, - "Paragraph": "The primary logistical goal of the food assistance component of a DDR process is to deliver food supplies to the right place, at the right time and cost, in good condition and with no loss. The main elements of a logistics strategy should include: \\n Port(s) of entry \u2013 identifying the most appropriate unloading port with the best location, capacity and costs; \\n Identifying the location for\/of the warehouses in transit and recipient countries; \\n Identifying logistics corridors\/routes and means of transport. The logistics strategy should plan for the following: \\n Organizing transport; \\n Setting up and managing warehouses; \\n Identifying additional needs; \\n Special operations; \\n Recommended logistic arrangements; \\n Cost analysis.", + "Paragraph": "The primary logistical goal of the food assistance component of a DDR process is to deliver food supplies to the right place, at the right time and cost, in good condition and with no loss. The main elements of a logistics strategy should include: \n Port(s) of entry \u2013 identifying the most appropriate unloading port with the best location, capacity and costs; \n Identifying the location for\/of the warehouses in transit and recipient countries; \n Identifying logistics corridors\/routes and means of transport. The logistics strategy should plan for the following: \n Organizing transport; \n Setting up and managing warehouses; \n Identifying additional needs; \n Special operations; \n Recommended logistic arrangements; \n Cost analysis.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -172938,7 +172938,7 @@ "Heading2": "5.6 In-kind food distribution", "Heading3": "5.6.1 Logistics strategy", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The logistics strategy should plan for the following: \\n Organizing transport; \\n Setting up and managing warehouses; \\n Identifying additional needs; \\n Special operations; \\n Recommended logistic arrangements; \\n Cost analysis.", + "Sentence": "The logistics strategy should plan for the following: \n Organizing transport; \n Setting up and managing warehouses; \n Identifying additional needs; \n Special operations; \n Recommended logistic arrangements; \n Cost analysis.", "newParagraph": "primary logistical goal food assistance component ddr process deliver food supply right place right time cost good condition loss main element logistics strategy include n port entry identifying appropriate unloading port best location capacity cost n identifying location forof warehouse transit recipient country n identifying logistics corridorsroutes mean transport logistics strategy plan following n organizing transport n setting managing warehouse n identifying additional need n special operation n recommended logistic arrangement n cost analysis", "ProcessedSent": "logistics strategy plan following n organizing transport n setting managing warehouse n identifying additional need n special operation n recommended logistic arrangement n cost analysis", "SentID": 9607 @@ -173431,7 +173431,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2783, - "Paragraph": "Cost must be taken into account for each of the various items that could be provided: \\n In relation to the nutrient value the food supplies to those who will receive it; \\n In relation to local (resale) value, as recipients may trade limited quantities of some items to obtain other essential items, e.g., fruits and vegetables from the local market; \\n With regard to whether some items are more likely to be misappropriated than others, as items that do not reach the groups they are intended for, or that are stolen from them, are of no benefit.", + "Paragraph": "Cost must be taken into account for each of the various items that could be provided: \n In relation to the nutrient value the food supplies to those who will receive it; \n In relation to local (resale) value, as recipients may trade limited quantities of some items to obtain other essential items, e.g., fruits and vegetables from the local market; \n With regard to whether some items are more likely to be misappropriated than others, as items that do not reach the groups they are intended for, or that are stolen from them, are of no benefit.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -173442,7 +173442,7 @@ "Heading2": "5.6 In-kind food distribution", "Heading3": "5.6.7 Cost effectiveness, attractiveness and local value", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Cost must be taken into account for each of the various items that could be provided: \\n In relation to the nutrient value the food supplies to those who will receive it; \\n In relation to local (resale) value, as recipients may trade limited quantities of some items to obtain other essential items, e.g., fruits and vegetables from the local market; \\n With regard to whether some items are more likely to be misappropriated than others, as items that do not reach the groups they are intended for, or that are stolen from them, are of no benefit.", + "Sentence": "Cost must be taken into account for each of the various items that could be provided: \n In relation to the nutrient value the food supplies to those who will receive it; \n In relation to local (resale) value, as recipients may trade limited quantities of some items to obtain other essential items, e.g., fruits and vegetables from the local market; \n With regard to whether some items are more likely to be misappropriated than others, as items that do not reach the groups they are intended for, or that are stolen from them, are of no benefit.", "newParagraph": "cost must taken account various item could provided n relation nutrient value food supply receive n relation local resale value recipient may trade limited quantity item obtain essential item eg fruit vegetable local market n regard whether item likely misappropriated others item reach group intended stolen benefit", "ProcessedSent": "cost must taken account various item could provided n relation nutrient value food supply receive n relation local resale value recipient may trade limited quantity item obtain essential item eg fruit vegetable local market n regard whether item likely misappropriated others item reach group intended stolen benefit", "SentID": 9635 @@ -174781,7 +174781,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2803, - "Paragraph": "A general guideline is that food assistance in the reinsertion phase of a DDR programme should not be provided for longer than a year; however, benefits should also be appropriate to the particular context. The following factors should be taken into account when deciding on the length of time the transfer should cover: \\n Whether ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups will be transported by vehicle to the relevant communities or whether they will have to carry the ration (if in-kind) (the latter may require protection mechanisms for women or other vulnerable groups); \\n The level of assistance when they reach the community; \\n The resources available to the food component of the DDR programme; \\n The timing and expected yields\/production of the next harvest; \\n The prospects for the re-establishment of employment and other income-generating activities, or the creation of new opportunities; \\n The overall food policy for the area, taking into account the total economic, social and ecological situation and related recovery and development activities.", + "Paragraph": "A general guideline is that food assistance in the reinsertion phase of a DDR programme should not be provided for longer than a year; however, benefits should also be appropriate to the particular context. The following factors should be taken into account when deciding on the length of time the transfer should cover: \n Whether ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups will be transported by vehicle to the relevant communities or whether they will have to carry the ration (if in-kind) (the latter may require protection mechanisms for women or other vulnerable groups); \n The level of assistance when they reach the community; \n The resources available to the food component of the DDR programme; \n The timing and expected yields\/production of the next harvest; \n The prospects for the re-establishment of employment and other income-generating activities, or the creation of new opportunities; \n The overall food policy for the area, taking into account the total economic, social and ecological situation and related recovery and development activities.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -174799,7 +174799,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2803, - "Paragraph": "A general guideline is that food assistance in the reinsertion phase of a DDR programme should not be provided for longer than a year; however, benefits should also be appropriate to the particular context. The following factors should be taken into account when deciding on the length of time the transfer should cover: \\n Whether ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups will be transported by vehicle to the relevant communities or whether they will have to carry the ration (if in-kind) (the latter may require protection mechanisms for women or other vulnerable groups); \\n The level of assistance when they reach the community; \\n The resources available to the food component of the DDR programme; \\n The timing and expected yields\/production of the next harvest; \\n The prospects for the re-establishment of employment and other income-generating activities, or the creation of new opportunities; \\n The overall food policy for the area, taking into account the total economic, social and ecological situation and related recovery and development activities.", + "Paragraph": "A general guideline is that food assistance in the reinsertion phase of a DDR programme should not be provided for longer than a year; however, benefits should also be appropriate to the particular context. The following factors should be taken into account when deciding on the length of time the transfer should cover: \n Whether ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups will be transported by vehicle to the relevant communities or whether they will have to carry the ration (if in-kind) (the latter may require protection mechanisms for women or other vulnerable groups); \n The level of assistance when they reach the community; \n The resources available to the food component of the DDR programme; \n The timing and expected yields\/production of the next harvest; \n The prospects for the re-establishment of employment and other income-generating activities, or the creation of new opportunities; \n The overall food policy for the area, taking into account the total economic, social and ecological situation and related recovery and development activities.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -174810,7 +174810,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.1. The Charter of the United Nations", "Heading3": "6.1.2 Reinsertion", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The following factors should be taken into account when deciding on the length of time the transfer should cover: \\n Whether ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups will be transported by vehicle to the relevant communities or whether they will have to carry the ration (if in-kind) (the latter may require protection mechanisms for women or other vulnerable groups); \\n The level of assistance when they reach the community; \\n The resources available to the food component of the DDR programme; \\n The timing and expected yields\/production of the next harvest; \\n The prospects for the re-establishment of employment and other income-generating activities, or the creation of new opportunities; \\n The overall food policy for the area, taking into account the total economic, social and ecological situation and related recovery and development activities.", + "Sentence": "The following factors should be taken into account when deciding on the length of time the transfer should cover: \n Whether ex-combatants and persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups will be transported by vehicle to the relevant communities or whether they will have to carry the ration (if in-kind) (the latter may require protection mechanisms for women or other vulnerable groups); \n The level of assistance when they reach the community; \n The resources available to the food component of the DDR programme; \n The timing and expected yields\/production of the next harvest; \n The prospects for the re-establishment of employment and other income-generating activities, or the creation of new opportunities; \n The overall food policy for the area, taking into account the total economic, social and ecological situation and related recovery and development activities.", "newParagraph": "general guideline food assistance reinsertion phase ddr programme provided longer year however benefit also appropriate particular context following factor taken account deciding length time transfer cover n whether excombatants person formerly associated armed force group transported vehicle relevant community whether carry ration inkind latter may require protection mechanism woman vulnerable group n level assistance reach community n resource available food component ddr programme n timing expected yieldsproduction next harvest n prospect reestablishment employment incomegenerating activity creation new opportunity n overall food policy area taking account total economic social ecological situation related recovery development activity", "ProcessedSent": "following factor taken account deciding length time transfer cover n whether excombatants person formerly associated armed force group transported vehicle relevant community whether carry ration inkind latter may require protection mechanism woman vulnerable group n level assistance reach community n resource available food component ddr programme n timing expected yieldsproduction next harvest n prospect reestablishment employment incomegenerating activity creation new opportunity n overall food policy area taking account total economic social ecological situation related recovery development activity", "SentID": 9711 @@ -174943,7 +174943,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2807, - "Paragraph": "The following food assistance activities could be implemented when support to reintegration is provided as part of a DDR process within or outside a DDR programme: \\n Supporting communities through FFA activities that directly benefit the selected populations; \\n Providing support, in particular nutrition interventions, directed at specific vulnerable groups; \\n Providing support to restore production capacity and increase food production by households; \\n Providing support (training, equipment, seeds and agricultural inputs) to selected populations or the wider community to restart agricultural production, enhance post-harvest management, identify market access options, and organise farmers to work and sell collectively; \\n Providing support for local markets through CBTs, buying supplies for DDR processes locally, encouraging private-sector involvement in food transport and delivery, and supporting social market outlets and community-based activities such as small enterprises for both women and men, and linking CBT programmes to a financial inclusion objective; \\n Encouraging participation in education and skills training (school feeding with nutrition education, FFT, education, adult literacy); \\n Maintaining the capacity to respond to emergencies and setbacks; \\n Expanding emergency rehabilitation projects (i.e., projects which rehabilitate local infrastructure) and reintegration projects; \\n Running household food security projects (urban\/rural).", + "Paragraph": "The following food assistance activities could be implemented when support to reintegration is provided as part of a DDR process within or outside a DDR programme: \n Supporting communities through FFA activities that directly benefit the selected populations; \n Providing support, in particular nutrition interventions, directed at specific vulnerable groups; \n Providing support to restore production capacity and increase food production by households; \n Providing support (training, equipment, seeds and agricultural inputs) to selected populations or the wider community to restart agricultural production, enhance post-harvest management, identify market access options, and organise farmers to work and sell collectively; \n Providing support for local markets through CBTs, buying supplies for DDR processes locally, encouraging private-sector involvement in food transport and delivery, and supporting social market outlets and community-based activities such as small enterprises for both women and men, and linking CBT programmes to a financial inclusion objective; \n Encouraging participation in education and skills training (school feeding with nutrition education, FFT, education, adult literacy); \n Maintaining the capacity to respond to emergencies and setbacks; \n Expanding emergency rehabilitation projects (i.e., projects which rehabilitate local infrastructure) and reintegration projects; \n Running household food security projects (urban\/rural).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -174954,7 +174954,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.2 Food assistance and reintegration support", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The following food assistance activities could be implemented when support to reintegration is provided as part of a DDR process within or outside a DDR programme: \\n Supporting communities through FFA activities that directly benefit the selected populations; \\n Providing support, in particular nutrition interventions, directed at specific vulnerable groups; \\n Providing support to restore production capacity and increase food production by households; \\n Providing support (training, equipment, seeds and agricultural inputs) to selected populations or the wider community to restart agricultural production, enhance post-harvest management, identify market access options, and organise farmers to work and sell collectively; \\n Providing support for local markets through CBTs, buying supplies for DDR processes locally, encouraging private-sector involvement in food transport and delivery, and supporting social market outlets and community-based activities such as small enterprises for both women and men, and linking CBT programmes to a financial inclusion objective; \\n Encouraging participation in education and skills training (school feeding with nutrition education, FFT, education, adult literacy); \\n Maintaining the capacity to respond to emergencies and setbacks; \\n Expanding emergency rehabilitation projects (i.e., projects which rehabilitate local infrastructure) and reintegration projects; \\n Running household food security projects (urban\/rural).", + "Sentence": "The following food assistance activities could be implemented when support to reintegration is provided as part of a DDR process within or outside a DDR programme: \n Supporting communities through FFA activities that directly benefit the selected populations; \n Providing support, in particular nutrition interventions, directed at specific vulnerable groups; \n Providing support to restore production capacity and increase food production by households; \n Providing support (training, equipment, seeds and agricultural inputs) to selected populations or the wider community to restart agricultural production, enhance post-harvest management, identify market access options, and organise farmers to work and sell collectively; \n Providing support for local markets through CBTs, buying supplies for DDR processes locally, encouraging private-sector involvement in food transport and delivery, and supporting social market outlets and community-based activities such as small enterprises for both women and men, and linking CBT programmes to a financial inclusion objective; \n Encouraging participation in education and skills training (school feeding with nutrition education, FFT, education, adult literacy); \n Maintaining the capacity to respond to emergencies and setbacks; \n Expanding emergency rehabilitation projects (i.e., projects which rehabilitate local infrastructure) and reintegration projects; \n Running household food security projects (urban\/rural).", "newParagraph": "following food assistance activity could implemented support reintegration provided part ddr process within outside ddr programme n supporting community ffa activity directly benefit selected population n providing support particular nutrition intervention directed specific vulnerable group n providing support restore production capacity increase food production household n providing support training equipment seed agricultural input selected population wider community restart agricultural production enhance postharvest management identify market access option organise farmer work sell collectively n providing support local market cbts buying supply ddr process locally encouraging privatesector involvement food transport delivery supporting social market outlet communitybased activity small enterprise woman men linking cbt programme financial inclusion objective n encouraging participation education skill training school feeding nutrition education fft education adult literacy n maintaining capacity respond emergency setback n expanding emergency rehabilitation project ie project rehabilitate local infrastructure reintegration project n running household food security project urbanrural", "ProcessedSent": "following food assistance activity could implemented support reintegration provided part ddr process within outside ddr programme n supporting community ffa activity directly benefit selected population n providing support particular nutrition intervention directed specific vulnerable group n providing support restore production capacity increase food production household n providing support training equipment seed agricultural input selected population wider community restart agricultural production enhance postharvest management identify market access option organise farmer work sell collectively n providing support local market cbts buying supply ddr process locally encouraging privatesector involvement food transport delivery supporting social market outlet communitybased activity small enterprise woman men linking cbt programme financial inclusion objective n encouraging participation education skill training school feeding nutrition education fft education adult literacy n maintaining capacity respond emergency setback n expanding emergency rehabilitation project ie project rehabilitate local infrastructure reintegration project n running household food security project urbanrural", "SentID": 9719 @@ -175159,7 +175159,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2811, - "Paragraph": "Food assistance may be provided to all five categories of people that should be taken into consideration in integrated DDR processes, depending on the context. \\n members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \\n abductees\/victims; \\n dependants\/families; \\n civilian returnees\/\u2019self-demobilized\u2019; \\n community members.", + "Paragraph": "Food assistance may be provided to all five categories of people that should be taken into consideration in integrated DDR processes, depending on the context. \n members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \n abductees\/victims; \n dependants\/families; \n civilian returnees\/\u2019self-demobilized\u2019; \n community members.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -175177,7 +175177,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2811, - "Paragraph": "Food assistance may be provided to all five categories of people that should be taken into consideration in integrated DDR processes, depending on the context. \\n members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \\n abductees\/victims; \\n dependants\/families; \\n civilian returnees\/\u2019self-demobilized\u2019; \\n community members.", + "Paragraph": "Food assistance may be provided to all five categories of people that should be taken into consideration in integrated DDR processes, depending on the context. \n members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \n abductees\/victims; \n dependants\/families; \n civilian returnees\/\u2019self-demobilized\u2019; \n community members.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -175188,14 +175188,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \\n abductees\/victims; \\n dependants\/families; \\n civilian returnees\/\u2019self-demobilized\u2019; \\n community members.", + "Sentence": "\n members of armed forces and groups who served in combat and\/or support roles (those in support roles are often referred to as being associated with armed forces and groups); \n abductees\/victims; \n dependants\/families; \n civilian returnees\/\u2019self-demobilized\u2019; \n community members.", "newParagraph": "food assistance may provided five category people taken consideration integrated ddr process depending context n member armed force group served combat andor support role support role often referred associated armed force group n abducteesvictims n dependantsfamilies n civilian returnees selfdemobilized n community member", "ProcessedSent": "n member armed force group served combat andor support role support role often referred associated armed force group n abducteesvictims n dependantsfamilies n civilian returnees selfdemobilized n community member", "SentID": 9732 }, { "ParagraphID": 2812, - "Paragraph": "Within these five categories, consideration should be given to addressing the specific needs of nutritionally vulnerable groups. These groups have specific nutrient requirements and include: \\n women of childbearing age; \\n pregnant and breastfeeding women and girls; \\n children 6\u201323 months old; \\n preschool children (2\u20135 years); \\n school-age children (6\u201310 years); \\n adolescents (10\u201319 years), especially girls; \\n older people; \\n persons with disabilities; and \\n persons with chronic illnesses including people leaving with HIV and TB.", + "Paragraph": "Within these five categories, consideration should be given to addressing the specific needs of nutritionally vulnerable groups. These groups have specific nutrient requirements and include: \n women of childbearing age; \n pregnant and breastfeeding women and girls; \n children 6\u201323 months old; \n preschool children (2\u20135 years); \n school-age children (6\u201310 years); \n adolescents (10\u201319 years), especially girls; \n older people; \n persons with disabilities; and \n persons with chronic illnesses including people leaving with HIV and TB.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -175213,7 +175213,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2812, - "Paragraph": "Within these five categories, consideration should be given to addressing the specific needs of nutritionally vulnerable groups. These groups have specific nutrient requirements and include: \\n women of childbearing age; \\n pregnant and breastfeeding women and girls; \\n children 6\u201323 months old; \\n preschool children (2\u20135 years); \\n school-age children (6\u201310 years); \\n adolescents (10\u201319 years), especially girls; \\n older people; \\n persons with disabilities; and \\n persons with chronic illnesses including people leaving with HIV and TB.", + "Paragraph": "Within these five categories, consideration should be given to addressing the specific needs of nutritionally vulnerable groups. These groups have specific nutrient requirements and include: \n women of childbearing age; \n pregnant and breastfeeding women and girls; \n children 6\u201323 months old; \n preschool children (2\u20135 years); \n school-age children (6\u201310 years); \n adolescents (10\u201319 years), especially girls; \n older people; \n persons with disabilities; and \n persons with chronic illnesses including people leaving with HIV and TB.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -175224,7 +175224,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "These groups have specific nutrient requirements and include: \\n women of childbearing age; \\n pregnant and breastfeeding women and girls; \\n children 6\u201323 months old; \\n preschool children (2\u20135 years); \\n school-age children (6\u201310 years); \\n adolescents (10\u201319 years), especially girls; \\n older people; \\n persons with disabilities; and \\n persons with chronic illnesses including people leaving with HIV and TB.", + "Sentence": "These groups have specific nutrient requirements and include: \n women of childbearing age; \n pregnant and breastfeeding women and girls; \n children 6\u201323 months old; \n preschool children (2\u20135 years); \n school-age children (6\u201310 years); \n adolescents (10\u201319 years), especially girls; \n older people; \n persons with disabilities; and \n persons with chronic illnesses including people leaving with HIV and TB.", "newParagraph": "within five category consideration given addressing specific need nutritionally vulnerable group group specific nutrient requirement include n woman childbearing age n pregnant breastfeeding woman girl n child 6 23 month old n preschool child 2 5 year n schoolage child 6 10 year n adolescent 10 19 year especially girl n older people n person disability n person chronic illness including people leaving hiv tb", "ProcessedSent": "group specific nutrient requirement include n woman childbearing age n pregnant breastfeeding woman girl n child 6 23 month old n preschool child 2 5 year n schoolage child 6 10 year n adolescent 10 19 year especially girl n older people n person disability n person chronic illness including people leaving hiv tb", "SentID": 9734 @@ -175447,7 +175447,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2818, - "Paragraph": "In terms of food distribution, at a minimum, information shall be gathered on: \\n The receipt and delivery of commodities; \\n The number (disaggregated by sex and age) of people receiving assistance; \\n Food storage, handling and the distribution of commodities; \\n Food assistance availability and unmet needs. ", + "Paragraph": "In terms of food distribution, at a minimum, information shall be gathered on: \n The receipt and delivery of commodities; \n The number (disaggregated by sex and age) of people receiving assistance; \n Food storage, handling and the distribution of commodities; \n Food assistance availability and unmet needs. ", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -175458,14 +175458,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "In terms of food distribution, at a minimum, information shall be gathered on: \\n The receipt and delivery of commodities; \\n The number (disaggregated by sex and age) of people receiving assistance; \\n Food storage, handling and the distribution of commodities; \\n Food assistance availability and unmet needs.", + "Sentence": "In terms of food distribution, at a minimum, information shall be gathered on: \n The receipt and delivery of commodities; \n The number (disaggregated by sex and age) of people receiving assistance; \n Food storage, handling and the distribution of commodities; \n Food assistance availability and unmet needs.", "newParagraph": "term food distribution minimum information shall gathered n receipt delivery commodity n number disaggregated sex age people receiving assistance n food storage handling distribution commodity n food assistance availability unmet need ", "ProcessedSent": "term food distribution minimum information shall gathered n receipt delivery commodity n number disaggregated sex age people receiving assistance n food storage handling distribution commodity n food assistance availability unmet need", "SentID": 9747 }, { "ParagraphID": 2819, - "Paragraph": "There are two main types of monitoring through which this information can be gathered: \\n Distribution: This type of monitoring, which is conducted on the day of distribution, includes several activities, including commodity monitoring, on-site monitoring and food basket monitoring. \\n Post-distribution: This monitoring takes place sometime after the distribution but before the next one. It includes monitoring of the way in which food assistance is used in households and communities, and market surveys.", + "Paragraph": "There are two main types of monitoring through which this information can be gathered: \n Distribution: This type of monitoring, which is conducted on the day of distribution, includes several activities, including commodity monitoring, on-site monitoring and food basket monitoring. \n Post-distribution: This monitoring takes place sometime after the distribution but before the next one. It includes monitoring of the way in which food assistance is used in households and communities, and market surveys.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -175476,14 +175476,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "There are two main types of monitoring through which this information can be gathered: \\n Distribution: This type of monitoring, which is conducted on the day of distribution, includes several activities, including commodity monitoring, on-site monitoring and food basket monitoring.", + "Sentence": "There are two main types of monitoring through which this information can be gathered: \n Distribution: This type of monitoring, which is conducted on the day of distribution, includes several activities, including commodity monitoring, on-site monitoring and food basket monitoring.", "newParagraph": "two main type monitoring information gathered n distribution type monitoring conducted day distribution includes several activity including commodity monitoring onsite monitoring food basket monitoring n postdistribution monitoring take place sometime distribution next one includes monitoring way food assistance used household community market survey", "ProcessedSent": "two main type monitoring information gathered n distribution type monitoring conducted day distribution includes several activity including commodity monitoring onsite monitoring food basket monitoring", "SentID": 9748 }, { "ParagraphID": 2819, - "Paragraph": "There are two main types of monitoring through which this information can be gathered: \\n Distribution: This type of monitoring, which is conducted on the day of distribution, includes several activities, including commodity monitoring, on-site monitoring and food basket monitoring. \\n Post-distribution: This monitoring takes place sometime after the distribution but before the next one. It includes monitoring of the way in which food assistance is used in households and communities, and market surveys.", + "Paragraph": "There are two main types of monitoring through which this information can be gathered: \n Distribution: This type of monitoring, which is conducted on the day of distribution, includes several activities, including commodity monitoring, on-site monitoring and food basket monitoring. \n Post-distribution: This monitoring takes place sometime after the distribution but before the next one. It includes monitoring of the way in which food assistance is used in households and communities, and market surveys.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -175494,14 +175494,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Post-distribution: This monitoring takes place sometime after the distribution but before the next one.", + "Sentence": "\n Post-distribution: This monitoring takes place sometime after the distribution but before the next one.", "newParagraph": "two main type monitoring information gathered n distribution type monitoring conducted day distribution includes several activity including commodity monitoring onsite monitoring food basket monitoring n postdistribution monitoring take place sometime distribution next one includes monitoring way food assistance used household community market survey", "ProcessedSent": "n postdistribution monitoring take place sometime distribution next one", "SentID": 9749 }, { "ParagraphID": 2819, - "Paragraph": "There are two main types of monitoring through which this information can be gathered: \\n Distribution: This type of monitoring, which is conducted on the day of distribution, includes several activities, including commodity monitoring, on-site monitoring and food basket monitoring. \\n Post-distribution: This monitoring takes place sometime after the distribution but before the next one. It includes monitoring of the way in which food assistance is used in households and communities, and market surveys.", + "Paragraph": "There are two main types of monitoring through which this information can be gathered: \n Distribution: This type of monitoring, which is conducted on the day of distribution, includes several activities, including commodity monitoring, on-site monitoring and food basket monitoring. \n Post-distribution: This monitoring takes place sometime after the distribution but before the next one. It includes monitoring of the way in which food assistance is used in households and communities, and market surveys.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -175519,7 +175519,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2820, - "Paragraph": "In order to increase the effectiveness of the current and future food assistance component, it is particularly important for data on DDR participants and beneficiaries to be collected so that it can be easily disaggregated. Numerical data should be systematically collected for the following categories: ex-combatants, persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups, and dependants (partners and relatives of ex-combatants). Every effort should be made to disaggregate the data by: \\n Sex and age; \\n Vulnerable group category (CAAFAG, people living with HIV\/ AIDS, persons with disabilities, etc.); \\n DDR location(s); \\n Armed force\/group affiliation.", + "Paragraph": "In order to increase the effectiveness of the current and future food assistance component, it is particularly important for data on DDR participants and beneficiaries to be collected so that it can be easily disaggregated. Numerical data should be systematically collected for the following categories: ex-combatants, persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups, and dependants (partners and relatives of ex-combatants). Every effort should be made to disaggregate the data by: \n Sex and age; \n Vulnerable group category (CAAFAG, people living with HIV\/ AIDS, persons with disabilities, etc.); \n DDR location(s); \n Armed force\/group affiliation.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -175537,7 +175537,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2820, - "Paragraph": "In order to increase the effectiveness of the current and future food assistance component, it is particularly important for data on DDR participants and beneficiaries to be collected so that it can be easily disaggregated. Numerical data should be systematically collected for the following categories: ex-combatants, persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups, and dependants (partners and relatives of ex-combatants). Every effort should be made to disaggregate the data by: \\n Sex and age; \\n Vulnerable group category (CAAFAG, people living with HIV\/ AIDS, persons with disabilities, etc.); \\n DDR location(s); \\n Armed force\/group affiliation.", + "Paragraph": "In order to increase the effectiveness of the current and future food assistance component, it is particularly important for data on DDR participants and beneficiaries to be collected so that it can be easily disaggregated. Numerical data should be systematically collected for the following categories: ex-combatants, persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups, and dependants (partners and relatives of ex-combatants). Every effort should be made to disaggregate the data by: \n Sex and age; \n Vulnerable group category (CAAFAG, people living with HIV\/ AIDS, persons with disabilities, etc.); \n DDR location(s); \n Armed force\/group affiliation.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -175555,7 +175555,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2820, - "Paragraph": "In order to increase the effectiveness of the current and future food assistance component, it is particularly important for data on DDR participants and beneficiaries to be collected so that it can be easily disaggregated. Numerical data should be systematically collected for the following categories: ex-combatants, persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups, and dependants (partners and relatives of ex-combatants). Every effort should be made to disaggregate the data by: \\n Sex and age; \\n Vulnerable group category (CAAFAG, people living with HIV\/ AIDS, persons with disabilities, etc.); \\n DDR location(s); \\n Armed force\/group affiliation.", + "Paragraph": "In order to increase the effectiveness of the current and future food assistance component, it is particularly important for data on DDR participants and beneficiaries to be collected so that it can be easily disaggregated. Numerical data should be systematically collected for the following categories: ex-combatants, persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups, and dependants (partners and relatives of ex-combatants). Every effort should be made to disaggregate the data by: \n Sex and age; \n Vulnerable group category (CAAFAG, people living with HIV\/ AIDS, persons with disabilities, etc.); \n DDR location(s); \n Armed force\/group affiliation.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -175566,14 +175566,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Every effort should be made to disaggregate the data by: \\n Sex and age; \\n Vulnerable group category (CAAFAG, people living with HIV\/ AIDS, persons with disabilities, etc.", + "Sentence": "Every effort should be made to disaggregate the data by: \n Sex and age; \n Vulnerable group category (CAAFAG, people living with HIV\/ AIDS, persons with disabilities, etc.", "newParagraph": "order increase effectiveness current future food assistance component particularly important data ddr participant beneficiary collected easily disaggregated numerical data systematically collected following category excombatants person formerly associated armed force group dependant partner relative excombatants every effort made disaggregate data n sex age n vulnerable group category caafag people living hiv aid person disability etc n ddr location n armed forcegroup affiliation", "ProcessedSent": "every effort made disaggregate data n sex age n vulnerable group category caafag people living hiv aid person disability etc", "SentID": 9753 }, { "ParagraphID": 2820, - "Paragraph": "In order to increase the effectiveness of the current and future food assistance component, it is particularly important for data on DDR participants and beneficiaries to be collected so that it can be easily disaggregated. Numerical data should be systematically collected for the following categories: ex-combatants, persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups, and dependants (partners and relatives of ex-combatants). Every effort should be made to disaggregate the data by: \\n Sex and age; \\n Vulnerable group category (CAAFAG, people living with HIV\/ AIDS, persons with disabilities, etc.); \\n DDR location(s); \\n Armed force\/group affiliation.", + "Paragraph": "In order to increase the effectiveness of the current and future food assistance component, it is particularly important for data on DDR participants and beneficiaries to be collected so that it can be easily disaggregated. Numerical data should be systematically collected for the following categories: ex-combatants, persons formerly associated with armed forces and groups, and dependants (partners and relatives of ex-combatants). Every effort should be made to disaggregate the data by: \n Sex and age; \n Vulnerable group category (CAAFAG, people living with HIV\/ AIDS, persons with disabilities, etc.); \n DDR location(s); \n Armed force\/group affiliation.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -175584,7 +175584,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "); \\n DDR location(s); \\n Armed force\/group affiliation.", + "Sentence": "); \n DDR location(s); \n Armed force\/group affiliation.", "newParagraph": "order increase effectiveness current future food assistance component particularly important data ddr participant beneficiary collected easily disaggregated numerical data systematically collected following category excombatants person formerly associated armed force group dependant partner relative excombatants every effort made disaggregate data n sex age n vulnerable group category caafag people living hiv aid person disability etc n ddr location n armed forcegroup affiliation", "ProcessedSent": " n ddr location n armed forcegroup affiliation", "SentID": 9754 @@ -175681,7 +175681,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2822, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Guidance on how the provision of food assistance is affected in contexts where armed groups designated as terrorist organisations by the United Nations Security Council, Member States or regional organizations are active will be developed at a later stage particularly to address elements of risk and vulnerability in the provision of support in these contexts. \\n 2 See Gina Pattugalan (2014) Linking food security, food assistance and protection from gender- based violence: WFP\u2019s experience \\n 3 See https:\/\/www.wfp.org\/publications\/2017-fill-nutrient-gap", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Guidance on how the provision of food assistance is affected in contexts where armed groups designated as terrorist organisations by the United Nations Security Council, Member States or regional organizations are active will be developed at a later stage particularly to address elements of risk and vulnerability in the provision of support in these contexts. \n 2 See Gina Pattugalan (2014) Linking food security, food assistance and protection from gender- based violence: WFP\u2019s experience \n 3 See https:\/\/www.wfp.org\/publications\/2017-fill-nutrient-gap", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -175692,14 +175692,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 1 Guidance on how the provision of food assistance is affected in contexts where armed groups designated as terrorist organisations by the United Nations Security Council, Member States or regional organizations are active will be developed at a later stage particularly to address elements of risk and vulnerability in the provision of support in these contexts.", + "Sentence": "\n 1 Guidance on how the provision of food assistance is affected in contexts where armed groups designated as terrorist organisations by the United Nations Security Council, Member States or regional organizations are active will be developed at a later stage particularly to address elements of risk and vulnerability in the provision of support in these contexts.", "newParagraph": "n 1 guidance provision food assistance affected context armed group designated terrorist organisation united nation security council member state regional organization active developed later stage particularly address element risk vulnerability provision support context n 2 see gina pattugalan 2014 linking food security food assistance protection gender based violence wfp experience n 3 see httpswwwwfporgpublications2017fillnutrientgap", "ProcessedSent": "n 1 guidance provision food assistance affected context armed group designated terrorist organisation united nation security council member state regional organization active developed later stage particularly address element risk vulnerability provision support context", "SentID": 9760 }, { "ParagraphID": 2822, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Guidance on how the provision of food assistance is affected in contexts where armed groups designated as terrorist organisations by the United Nations Security Council, Member States or regional organizations are active will be developed at a later stage particularly to address elements of risk and vulnerability in the provision of support in these contexts. \\n 2 See Gina Pattugalan (2014) Linking food security, food assistance and protection from gender- based violence: WFP\u2019s experience \\n 3 See https:\/\/www.wfp.org\/publications\/2017-fill-nutrient-gap", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Guidance on how the provision of food assistance is affected in contexts where armed groups designated as terrorist organisations by the United Nations Security Council, Member States or regional organizations are active will be developed at a later stage particularly to address elements of risk and vulnerability in the provision of support in these contexts. \n 2 See Gina Pattugalan (2014) Linking food security, food assistance and protection from gender- based violence: WFP\u2019s experience \n 3 See https:\/\/www.wfp.org\/publications\/2017-fill-nutrient-gap", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -175710,7 +175710,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 2 See Gina Pattugalan (2014) Linking food security, food assistance and protection from gender- based violence: WFP\u2019s experience \\n 3 See https:\/\/www.wfp.org\/publications\/2017-fill-nutrient-gap", + "Sentence": "\n 2 See Gina Pattugalan (2014) Linking food security, food assistance and protection from gender- based violence: WFP\u2019s experience \n 3 See https:\/\/www.wfp.org\/publications\/2017-fill-nutrient-gap", "newParagraph": "n 1 guidance provision food assistance affected context armed group designated terrorist organisation united nation security council member state regional organization active developed later stage particularly address element risk vulnerability provision support context n 2 see gina pattugalan 2014 linking food security food assistance protection gender based violence wfp experience n 3 see httpswwwwfporgpublications2017fillnutrientgap", "ProcessedSent": "n 2 see gina pattugalan 2014 linking food security food assistance protection gender based violence wfp experience n 3 see httpswwwwfporgpublications2017fillnutrientgap", "SentID": 9761 @@ -175789,7 +175789,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2825, - "Paragraph": "The basic requirements for HIV\/AIDS programmes in DDR are: \\n identification and training of HIV focal points within DDR field offices; \\n the development of HIV\/AIDS awareness material and provision of basic awareness training for target groups, with peer education programmes during the reinsertion and reintegration phases to build capacity. Awareness training can start before demobiliza- tion, depending on the nature of soldiers\u2019\/ex-combatants\u2019 deployment and organizational structure; \\n the provision of voluntary confidential counselling and testing (VCT) during demobi- lization and reintegration. An HIV test, with counselling, should be routinely offered (opt-in) as a standard part of medical screening in countries with an HIV prevalence of 5 percent or more. VCT should be provided in all settings throughout the DDR process, building on local services. Undergoing an HIV test, however, should not be a condition for participation in the DDR process, although planners should be aware of any national legislation that may exclude HIV-positive personnel from newly formed military or civil defence forces; \\n screening and treatment for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), which should be a standard part of health checks for participants; \\n the provision of condoms and availability of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) kits dur- ing demobilization, reinsertion and reintegration; \\n treatment for opportunistic infections and, where feasible, referral for anti-retroviral (ARV) treatment within the national health care system; \\n the implementation of HIV\/AIDS public information and awareness campaigns to sensitize \u2018receiving\u2019 communities, to raise general awareness and to reduce possible stigma and discrimination against returning combatants, including women associated with armed forces and groups, which could undermine reintegration efforts. Planning in communities needs to start in advance of demobilization.", + "Paragraph": "The basic requirements for HIV\/AIDS programmes in DDR are: \n identification and training of HIV focal points within DDR field offices; \n the development of HIV\/AIDS awareness material and provision of basic awareness training for target groups, with peer education programmes during the reinsertion and reintegration phases to build capacity. Awareness training can start before demobiliza- tion, depending on the nature of soldiers\u2019\/ex-combatants\u2019 deployment and organizational structure; \n the provision of voluntary confidential counselling and testing (VCT) during demobi- lization and reintegration. An HIV test, with counselling, should be routinely offered (opt-in) as a standard part of medical screening in countries with an HIV prevalence of 5 percent or more. VCT should be provided in all settings throughout the DDR process, building on local services. Undergoing an HIV test, however, should not be a condition for participation in the DDR process, although planners should be aware of any national legislation that may exclude HIV-positive personnel from newly formed military or civil defence forces; \n screening and treatment for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), which should be a standard part of health checks for participants; \n the provision of condoms and availability of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) kits dur- ing demobilization, reinsertion and reintegration; \n treatment for opportunistic infections and, where feasible, referral for anti-retroviral (ARV) treatment within the national health care system; \n the implementation of HIV\/AIDS public information and awareness campaigns to sensitize \u2018receiving\u2019 communities, to raise general awareness and to reduce possible stigma and discrimination against returning combatants, including women associated with armed forces and groups, which could undermine reintegration efforts. Planning in communities needs to start in advance of demobilization.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -175800,14 +175800,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The basic requirements for HIV\/AIDS programmes in DDR are: \\n identification and training of HIV focal points within DDR field offices; \\n the development of HIV\/AIDS awareness material and provision of basic awareness training for target groups, with peer education programmes during the reinsertion and reintegration phases to build capacity.", + "Sentence": "The basic requirements for HIV\/AIDS programmes in DDR are: \n identification and training of HIV focal points within DDR field offices; \n the development of HIV\/AIDS awareness material and provision of basic awareness training for target groups, with peer education programmes during the reinsertion and reintegration phases to build capacity.", "newParagraph": "basic requirement hivaids programme ddr n identification training hiv focal point within ddr field office n development hivaids awareness material provision basic awareness training target group peer education programme reinsertion reintegration phase build capacity awareness training start demobiliza tion depending nature soldier excombatants deployment organizational structure n provision voluntary confidential counselling testing vct demobi lization reintegration hiv test counselling routinely offered optin standard part medical screening country hiv prevalence 5 percent vct provided setting throughout ddr process building local service undergoing hiv test however condition participation ddr process although planner aware national legislation may exclude hivpositive personnel newly formed military civil defence force n screening treatment sexually transmitted infection stis standard part health check participant n provision condom availability postexposure prophylaxis pep kit dur ing demobilization reinsertion reintegration n treatment opportunistic infection feasible referral antiretroviral arv treatment within national health care system n implementation hivaids public information awareness campaign sensitize receiving community raise general awareness reduce possible stigma discrimination returning combatant including woman associated armed force group could undermine reintegration effort planning community need start advance demobilization", "ProcessedSent": "basic requirement hivaids programme ddr n identification training hiv focal point within ddr field office n development hivaids awareness material provision basic awareness training target group peer education programme reinsertion reintegration phase build capacity", "SentID": 9766 }, { "ParagraphID": 2825, - "Paragraph": "The basic requirements for HIV\/AIDS programmes in DDR are: \\n identification and training of HIV focal points within DDR field offices; \\n the development of HIV\/AIDS awareness material and provision of basic awareness training for target groups, with peer education programmes during the reinsertion and reintegration phases to build capacity. Awareness training can start before demobiliza- tion, depending on the nature of soldiers\u2019\/ex-combatants\u2019 deployment and organizational structure; \\n the provision of voluntary confidential counselling and testing (VCT) during demobi- lization and reintegration. An HIV test, with counselling, should be routinely offered (opt-in) as a standard part of medical screening in countries with an HIV prevalence of 5 percent or more. VCT should be provided in all settings throughout the DDR process, building on local services. Undergoing an HIV test, however, should not be a condition for participation in the DDR process, although planners should be aware of any national legislation that may exclude HIV-positive personnel from newly formed military or civil defence forces; \\n screening and treatment for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), which should be a standard part of health checks for participants; \\n the provision of condoms and availability of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) kits dur- ing demobilization, reinsertion and reintegration; \\n treatment for opportunistic infections and, where feasible, referral for anti-retroviral (ARV) treatment within the national health care system; \\n the implementation of HIV\/AIDS public information and awareness campaigns to sensitize \u2018receiving\u2019 communities, to raise general awareness and to reduce possible stigma and discrimination against returning combatants, including women associated with armed forces and groups, which could undermine reintegration efforts. Planning in communities needs to start in advance of demobilization.", + "Paragraph": "The basic requirements for HIV\/AIDS programmes in DDR are: \n identification and training of HIV focal points within DDR field offices; \n the development of HIV\/AIDS awareness material and provision of basic awareness training for target groups, with peer education programmes during the reinsertion and reintegration phases to build capacity. Awareness training can start before demobiliza- tion, depending on the nature of soldiers\u2019\/ex-combatants\u2019 deployment and organizational structure; \n the provision of voluntary confidential counselling and testing (VCT) during demobi- lization and reintegration. An HIV test, with counselling, should be routinely offered (opt-in) as a standard part of medical screening in countries with an HIV prevalence of 5 percent or more. VCT should be provided in all settings throughout the DDR process, building on local services. Undergoing an HIV test, however, should not be a condition for participation in the DDR process, although planners should be aware of any national legislation that may exclude HIV-positive personnel from newly formed military or civil defence forces; \n screening and treatment for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), which should be a standard part of health checks for participants; \n the provision of condoms and availability of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) kits dur- ing demobilization, reinsertion and reintegration; \n treatment for opportunistic infections and, where feasible, referral for anti-retroviral (ARV) treatment within the national health care system; \n the implementation of HIV\/AIDS public information and awareness campaigns to sensitize \u2018receiving\u2019 communities, to raise general awareness and to reduce possible stigma and discrimination against returning combatants, including women associated with armed forces and groups, which could undermine reintegration efforts. Planning in communities needs to start in advance of demobilization.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -175818,14 +175818,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Awareness training can start before demobiliza- tion, depending on the nature of soldiers\u2019\/ex-combatants\u2019 deployment and organizational structure; \\n the provision of voluntary confidential counselling and testing (VCT) during demobi- lization and reintegration.", + "Sentence": "Awareness training can start before demobiliza- tion, depending on the nature of soldiers\u2019\/ex-combatants\u2019 deployment and organizational structure; \n the provision of voluntary confidential counselling and testing (VCT) during demobi- lization and reintegration.", "newParagraph": "basic requirement hivaids programme ddr n identification training hiv focal point within ddr field office n development hivaids awareness material provision basic awareness training target group peer education programme reinsertion reintegration phase build capacity awareness training start demobiliza tion depending nature soldier excombatants deployment organizational structure n provision voluntary confidential counselling testing vct demobi lization reintegration hiv test counselling routinely offered optin standard part medical screening country hiv prevalence 5 percent vct provided setting throughout ddr process building local service undergoing hiv test however condition participation ddr process although planner aware national legislation may exclude hivpositive personnel newly formed military civil defence force n screening treatment sexually transmitted infection stis standard part health check participant n provision condom availability postexposure prophylaxis pep kit dur ing demobilization reinsertion reintegration n treatment opportunistic infection feasible referral antiretroviral arv treatment within national health care system n implementation hivaids public information awareness campaign sensitize receiving community raise general awareness reduce possible stigma discrimination returning combatant including woman associated armed force group could undermine reintegration effort planning community need start advance demobilization", "ProcessedSent": "awareness training start demobiliza tion depending nature soldier excombatants deployment organizational structure n provision voluntary confidential counselling testing vct demobi lization reintegration", "SentID": 9767 }, { "ParagraphID": 2825, - "Paragraph": "The basic requirements for HIV\/AIDS programmes in DDR are: \\n identification and training of HIV focal points within DDR field offices; \\n the development of HIV\/AIDS awareness material and provision of basic awareness training for target groups, with peer education programmes during the reinsertion and reintegration phases to build capacity. Awareness training can start before demobiliza- tion, depending on the nature of soldiers\u2019\/ex-combatants\u2019 deployment and organizational structure; \\n the provision of voluntary confidential counselling and testing (VCT) during demobi- lization and reintegration. An HIV test, with counselling, should be routinely offered (opt-in) as a standard part of medical screening in countries with an HIV prevalence of 5 percent or more. VCT should be provided in all settings throughout the DDR process, building on local services. Undergoing an HIV test, however, should not be a condition for participation in the DDR process, although planners should be aware of any national legislation that may exclude HIV-positive personnel from newly formed military or civil defence forces; \\n screening and treatment for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), which should be a standard part of health checks for participants; \\n the provision of condoms and availability of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) kits dur- ing demobilization, reinsertion and reintegration; \\n treatment for opportunistic infections and, where feasible, referral for anti-retroviral (ARV) treatment within the national health care system; \\n the implementation of HIV\/AIDS public information and awareness campaigns to sensitize \u2018receiving\u2019 communities, to raise general awareness and to reduce possible stigma and discrimination against returning combatants, including women associated with armed forces and groups, which could undermine reintegration efforts. Planning in communities needs to start in advance of demobilization.", + "Paragraph": "The basic requirements for HIV\/AIDS programmes in DDR are: \n identification and training of HIV focal points within DDR field offices; \n the development of HIV\/AIDS awareness material and provision of basic awareness training for target groups, with peer education programmes during the reinsertion and reintegration phases to build capacity. Awareness training can start before demobiliza- tion, depending on the nature of soldiers\u2019\/ex-combatants\u2019 deployment and organizational structure; \n the provision of voluntary confidential counselling and testing (VCT) during demobi- lization and reintegration. An HIV test, with counselling, should be routinely offered (opt-in) as a standard part of medical screening in countries with an HIV prevalence of 5 percent or more. VCT should be provided in all settings throughout the DDR process, building on local services. Undergoing an HIV test, however, should not be a condition for participation in the DDR process, although planners should be aware of any national legislation that may exclude HIV-positive personnel from newly formed military or civil defence forces; \n screening and treatment for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), which should be a standard part of health checks for participants; \n the provision of condoms and availability of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) kits dur- ing demobilization, reinsertion and reintegration; \n treatment for opportunistic infections and, where feasible, referral for anti-retroviral (ARV) treatment within the national health care system; \n the implementation of HIV\/AIDS public information and awareness campaigns to sensitize \u2018receiving\u2019 communities, to raise general awareness and to reduce possible stigma and discrimination against returning combatants, including women associated with armed forces and groups, which could undermine reintegration efforts. Planning in communities needs to start in advance of demobilization.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -175843,7 +175843,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2825, - "Paragraph": "The basic requirements for HIV\/AIDS programmes in DDR are: \\n identification and training of HIV focal points within DDR field offices; \\n the development of HIV\/AIDS awareness material and provision of basic awareness training for target groups, with peer education programmes during the reinsertion and reintegration phases to build capacity. Awareness training can start before demobiliza- tion, depending on the nature of soldiers\u2019\/ex-combatants\u2019 deployment and organizational structure; \\n the provision of voluntary confidential counselling and testing (VCT) during demobi- lization and reintegration. An HIV test, with counselling, should be routinely offered (opt-in) as a standard part of medical screening in countries with an HIV prevalence of 5 percent or more. VCT should be provided in all settings throughout the DDR process, building on local services. Undergoing an HIV test, however, should not be a condition for participation in the DDR process, although planners should be aware of any national legislation that may exclude HIV-positive personnel from newly formed military or civil defence forces; \\n screening and treatment for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), which should be a standard part of health checks for participants; \\n the provision of condoms and availability of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) kits dur- ing demobilization, reinsertion and reintegration; \\n treatment for opportunistic infections and, where feasible, referral for anti-retroviral (ARV) treatment within the national health care system; \\n the implementation of HIV\/AIDS public information and awareness campaigns to sensitize \u2018receiving\u2019 communities, to raise general awareness and to reduce possible stigma and discrimination against returning combatants, including women associated with armed forces and groups, which could undermine reintegration efforts. Planning in communities needs to start in advance of demobilization.", + "Paragraph": "The basic requirements for HIV\/AIDS programmes in DDR are: \n identification and training of HIV focal points within DDR field offices; \n the development of HIV\/AIDS awareness material and provision of basic awareness training for target groups, with peer education programmes during the reinsertion and reintegration phases to build capacity. Awareness training can start before demobiliza- tion, depending on the nature of soldiers\u2019\/ex-combatants\u2019 deployment and organizational structure; \n the provision of voluntary confidential counselling and testing (VCT) during demobi- lization and reintegration. An HIV test, with counselling, should be routinely offered (opt-in) as a standard part of medical screening in countries with an HIV prevalence of 5 percent or more. VCT should be provided in all settings throughout the DDR process, building on local services. Undergoing an HIV test, however, should not be a condition for participation in the DDR process, although planners should be aware of any national legislation that may exclude HIV-positive personnel from newly formed military or civil defence forces; \n screening and treatment for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), which should be a standard part of health checks for participants; \n the provision of condoms and availability of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) kits dur- ing demobilization, reinsertion and reintegration; \n treatment for opportunistic infections and, where feasible, referral for anti-retroviral (ARV) treatment within the national health care system; \n the implementation of HIV\/AIDS public information and awareness campaigns to sensitize \u2018receiving\u2019 communities, to raise general awareness and to reduce possible stigma and discrimination against returning combatants, including women associated with armed forces and groups, which could undermine reintegration efforts. Planning in communities needs to start in advance of demobilization.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -175861,7 +175861,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2825, - "Paragraph": "The basic requirements for HIV\/AIDS programmes in DDR are: \\n identification and training of HIV focal points within DDR field offices; \\n the development of HIV\/AIDS awareness material and provision of basic awareness training for target groups, with peer education programmes during the reinsertion and reintegration phases to build capacity. Awareness training can start before demobiliza- tion, depending on the nature of soldiers\u2019\/ex-combatants\u2019 deployment and organizational structure; \\n the provision of voluntary confidential counselling and testing (VCT) during demobi- lization and reintegration. An HIV test, with counselling, should be routinely offered (opt-in) as a standard part of medical screening in countries with an HIV prevalence of 5 percent or more. VCT should be provided in all settings throughout the DDR process, building on local services. Undergoing an HIV test, however, should not be a condition for participation in the DDR process, although planners should be aware of any national legislation that may exclude HIV-positive personnel from newly formed military or civil defence forces; \\n screening and treatment for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), which should be a standard part of health checks for participants; \\n the provision of condoms and availability of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) kits dur- ing demobilization, reinsertion and reintegration; \\n treatment for opportunistic infections and, where feasible, referral for anti-retroviral (ARV) treatment within the national health care system; \\n the implementation of HIV\/AIDS public information and awareness campaigns to sensitize \u2018receiving\u2019 communities, to raise general awareness and to reduce possible stigma and discrimination against returning combatants, including women associated with armed forces and groups, which could undermine reintegration efforts. Planning in communities needs to start in advance of demobilization.", + "Paragraph": "The basic requirements for HIV\/AIDS programmes in DDR are: \n identification and training of HIV focal points within DDR field offices; \n the development of HIV\/AIDS awareness material and provision of basic awareness training for target groups, with peer education programmes during the reinsertion and reintegration phases to build capacity. Awareness training can start before demobiliza- tion, depending on the nature of soldiers\u2019\/ex-combatants\u2019 deployment and organizational structure; \n the provision of voluntary confidential counselling and testing (VCT) during demobi- lization and reintegration. An HIV test, with counselling, should be routinely offered (opt-in) as a standard part of medical screening in countries with an HIV prevalence of 5 percent or more. VCT should be provided in all settings throughout the DDR process, building on local services. Undergoing an HIV test, however, should not be a condition for participation in the DDR process, although planners should be aware of any national legislation that may exclude HIV-positive personnel from newly formed military or civil defence forces; \n screening and treatment for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), which should be a standard part of health checks for participants; \n the provision of condoms and availability of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) kits dur- ing demobilization, reinsertion and reintegration; \n treatment for opportunistic infections and, where feasible, referral for anti-retroviral (ARV) treatment within the national health care system; \n the implementation of HIV\/AIDS public information and awareness campaigns to sensitize \u2018receiving\u2019 communities, to raise general awareness and to reduce possible stigma and discrimination against returning combatants, including women associated with armed forces and groups, which could undermine reintegration efforts. Planning in communities needs to start in advance of demobilization.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -175872,14 +175872,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Undergoing an HIV test, however, should not be a condition for participation in the DDR process, although planners should be aware of any national legislation that may exclude HIV-positive personnel from newly formed military or civil defence forces; \\n screening and treatment for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), which should be a standard part of health checks for participants; \\n the provision of condoms and availability of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) kits dur- ing demobilization, reinsertion and reintegration; \\n treatment for opportunistic infections and, where feasible, referral for anti-retroviral (ARV) treatment within the national health care system; \\n the implementation of HIV\/AIDS public information and awareness campaigns to sensitize \u2018receiving\u2019 communities, to raise general awareness and to reduce possible stigma and discrimination against returning combatants, including women associated with armed forces and groups, which could undermine reintegration efforts.", + "Sentence": "Undergoing an HIV test, however, should not be a condition for participation in the DDR process, although planners should be aware of any national legislation that may exclude HIV-positive personnel from newly formed military or civil defence forces; \n screening and treatment for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), which should be a standard part of health checks for participants; \n the provision of condoms and availability of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) kits dur- ing demobilization, reinsertion and reintegration; \n treatment for opportunistic infections and, where feasible, referral for anti-retroviral (ARV) treatment within the national health care system; \n the implementation of HIV\/AIDS public information and awareness campaigns to sensitize \u2018receiving\u2019 communities, to raise general awareness and to reduce possible stigma and discrimination against returning combatants, including women associated with armed forces and groups, which could undermine reintegration efforts.", "newParagraph": "basic requirement hivaids programme ddr n identification training hiv focal point within ddr field office n development hivaids awareness material provision basic awareness training target group peer education programme reinsertion reintegration phase build capacity awareness training start demobiliza tion depending nature soldier excombatants deployment organizational structure n provision voluntary confidential counselling testing vct demobi lization reintegration hiv test counselling routinely offered optin standard part medical screening country hiv prevalence 5 percent vct provided setting throughout ddr process building local service undergoing hiv test however condition participation ddr process although planner aware national legislation may exclude hivpositive personnel newly formed military civil defence force n screening treatment sexually transmitted infection stis standard part health check participant n provision condom availability postexposure prophylaxis pep kit dur ing demobilization reinsertion reintegration n treatment opportunistic infection feasible referral antiretroviral arv treatment within national health care system n implementation hivaids public information awareness campaign sensitize receiving community raise general awareness reduce possible stigma discrimination returning combatant including woman associated armed force group could undermine reintegration effort planning community need start advance demobilization", "ProcessedSent": "undergoing hiv test however condition participation ddr process although planner aware national legislation may exclude hivpositive personnel newly formed military civil defence force n screening treatment sexually transmitted infection stis standard part health check participant n provision condom availability postexposure prophylaxis pep kit dur ing demobilization reinsertion reintegration n treatment opportunistic infection feasible referral antiretroviral arv treatment within national health care system n implementation hivaids public information awareness campaign sensitize receiving community raise general awareness reduce possible stigma discrimination returning combatant including woman associated armed force group could undermine reintegration effort", "SentID": 9770 }, { "ParagraphID": 2825, - "Paragraph": "The basic requirements for HIV\/AIDS programmes in DDR are: \\n identification and training of HIV focal points within DDR field offices; \\n the development of HIV\/AIDS awareness material and provision of basic awareness training for target groups, with peer education programmes during the reinsertion and reintegration phases to build capacity. Awareness training can start before demobiliza- tion, depending on the nature of soldiers\u2019\/ex-combatants\u2019 deployment and organizational structure; \\n the provision of voluntary confidential counselling and testing (VCT) during demobi- lization and reintegration. An HIV test, with counselling, should be routinely offered (opt-in) as a standard part of medical screening in countries with an HIV prevalence of 5 percent or more. VCT should be provided in all settings throughout the DDR process, building on local services. Undergoing an HIV test, however, should not be a condition for participation in the DDR process, although planners should be aware of any national legislation that may exclude HIV-positive personnel from newly formed military or civil defence forces; \\n screening and treatment for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), which should be a standard part of health checks for participants; \\n the provision of condoms and availability of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) kits dur- ing demobilization, reinsertion and reintegration; \\n treatment for opportunistic infections and, where feasible, referral for anti-retroviral (ARV) treatment within the national health care system; \\n the implementation of HIV\/AIDS public information and awareness campaigns to sensitize \u2018receiving\u2019 communities, to raise general awareness and to reduce possible stigma and discrimination against returning combatants, including women associated with armed forces and groups, which could undermine reintegration efforts. Planning in communities needs to start in advance of demobilization.", + "Paragraph": "The basic requirements for HIV\/AIDS programmes in DDR are: \n identification and training of HIV focal points within DDR field offices; \n the development of HIV\/AIDS awareness material and provision of basic awareness training for target groups, with peer education programmes during the reinsertion and reintegration phases to build capacity. Awareness training can start before demobiliza- tion, depending on the nature of soldiers\u2019\/ex-combatants\u2019 deployment and organizational structure; \n the provision of voluntary confidential counselling and testing (VCT) during demobi- lization and reintegration. An HIV test, with counselling, should be routinely offered (opt-in) as a standard part of medical screening in countries with an HIV prevalence of 5 percent or more. VCT should be provided in all settings throughout the DDR process, building on local services. Undergoing an HIV test, however, should not be a condition for participation in the DDR process, although planners should be aware of any national legislation that may exclude HIV-positive personnel from newly formed military or civil defence forces; \n screening and treatment for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), which should be a standard part of health checks for participants; \n the provision of condoms and availability of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) kits dur- ing demobilization, reinsertion and reintegration; \n treatment for opportunistic infections and, where feasible, referral for anti-retroviral (ARV) treatment within the national health care system; \n the implementation of HIV\/AIDS public information and awareness campaigns to sensitize \u2018receiving\u2019 communities, to raise general awareness and to reduce possible stigma and discrimination against returning combatants, including women associated with armed forces and groups, which could undermine reintegration efforts. Planning in communities needs to start in advance of demobilization.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -176059,7 +176059,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2829, - "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -176077,7 +176077,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2829, - "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -176095,7 +176095,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2829, - "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -176113,7 +176113,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2829, - "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -176124,7 +176124,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "newParagraph": "annex contains list term definition abbreviation used standard com plete glossary term definition abbreviation used series integrated ddr standard iddrs given iddrs 120 iddrs series word shall may must used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "ProcessedSent": "use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "SentID": 9784 @@ -176401,7 +176401,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2834, - "Paragraph": "A number of UN resolutions and declarations highlight the obligation to include HIV\/AIDS initiatives in responses to conflict and provide the legal framework for such a requirement: \\n Security Council resolution 1308 (S\/RES\/1308) of 2000 and Presidential Statement (S\/PRST\/2005\/33) of 2005; \\n Security Council resolution 1325 (S\/RES\/1325) of 2000; \\n UN General Assembly HIV\/AIDS Declaration of Commitment of June 2001, endorsed by General Assembly resolution A\/RES\/S-26\/2 and reiterated by General Assembly A\/RES\/60\/262.", + "Paragraph": "A number of UN resolutions and declarations highlight the obligation to include HIV\/AIDS initiatives in responses to conflict and provide the legal framework for such a requirement: \n Security Council resolution 1308 (S\/RES\/1308) of 2000 and Presidential Statement (S\/PRST\/2005\/33) of 2005; \n Security Council resolution 1325 (S\/RES\/1325) of 2000; \n UN General Assembly HIV\/AIDS Declaration of Commitment of June 2001, endorsed by General Assembly resolution A\/RES\/S-26\/2 and reiterated by General Assembly A\/RES\/60\/262.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -176412,7 +176412,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "A number of UN resolutions and declarations highlight the obligation to include HIV\/AIDS initiatives in responses to conflict and provide the legal framework for such a requirement: \\n Security Council resolution 1308 (S\/RES\/1308) of 2000 and Presidential Statement (S\/PRST\/2005\/33) of 2005; \\n Security Council resolution 1325 (S\/RES\/1325) of 2000; \\n UN General Assembly HIV\/AIDS Declaration of Commitment of June 2001, endorsed by General Assembly resolution A\/RES\/S-26\/2 and reiterated by General Assembly A\/RES\/60\/262.", + "Sentence": "A number of UN resolutions and declarations highlight the obligation to include HIV\/AIDS initiatives in responses to conflict and provide the legal framework for such a requirement: \n Security Council resolution 1308 (S\/RES\/1308) of 2000 and Presidential Statement (S\/PRST\/2005\/33) of 2005; \n Security Council resolution 1325 (S\/RES\/1325) of 2000; \n UN General Assembly HIV\/AIDS Declaration of Commitment of June 2001, endorsed by General Assembly resolution A\/RES\/S-26\/2 and reiterated by General Assembly A\/RES\/60\/262.", "newParagraph": "number un resolution declaration highlight obligation include hivaids initiative response conflict provide legal framework requirement n security council resolution 1308 sres1308 2000 presidential statement sprst200533 2005 n security council resolution 1325 sres1325 2000 n un general assembly hivaids declaration commitment june 2001 endorsed general assembly resolution aress262 reiterated general assembly ares60262", "ProcessedSent": "number un resolution declaration highlight obligation include hivaids initiative response conflict provide legal framework requirement n security council resolution 1308 sres1308 2000 presidential statement sprst200533 2005 n security council resolution 1325 sres1325 2000 n un general assembly hivaids declaration commitment june 2001 endorsed general assembly resolution aress262 reiterated general assembly ares60262", "SentID": 9800 @@ -177985,7 +177985,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2853, - "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \\n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \\n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \\n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", + "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -177996,14 +177996,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1. Planning assessments", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \\n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)?", + "Sentence": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)?", "newParagraph": "situation analysis action planning hiv include following important component n baseline data national hivaids prevalence usually based sentinel surveillance pregnant woman rate stis significant difference different area country generalized epidemic restricted highrisk group data available blood donor donor routinely tested highrisk group driving epidemic example heterosexual sex men sex men poor medical procedure blood transfusion mothertochild transmission intravenous drug use regional status epidemic especially neighbouring country may provided external base excombatants n knowledge attitude vulnerability qualitative data obtained key formant interview focus group discussion include health community worker religious leader woman youth group government official un agency ngocbos well excombatants associated fighting force group sometimes data knowledge attitude practice regarding hiv aid contained demographic health survey regularly carried many country although may interrupted conflict important identify factor may increase vulnerability hiv level rape genderbased violence extent survival sex planning process cultural sensitivity participant beneficiary must considered appropriate service designed within given country example acceptability trend condom use attitude sexual relation outside marriage vary enormously country specific context must inform design programme understanding local perception also important order prevent problem reintegration phase example case community may blame excombatants woman associated fighting force spread hiv therefore stigmatize n identify existing capacity assessment need map existing health care facility around community reintegration going take place exercise ascertain whether country functioning national aid control strategy programme extent ministry engaged go beyond health ministry include example ministry interior defence education etc prevention awareness programme place directed specific group capacity counselling testing exist strategy rollout arvs financial support available pending global fund aid malaria tb u president emergency plan aid relief world bank assistance framework include ddr actor national international present country un theme group technical working group place standard mechanism coordinate hiv initiative un agency", "ProcessedSent": "situation analysis action planning hiv include following important component n baseline data national hivaids prevalence usually based sentinel surveillance pregnant woman", "SentID": 9888 }, { "ParagraphID": 2853, - "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \\n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \\n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \\n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", + "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -178021,7 +178021,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2853, - "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \\n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \\n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \\n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", + "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -178039,7 +178039,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2853, - "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \\n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \\n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \\n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", + "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -178057,7 +178057,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2853, - "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \\n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \\n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \\n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", + "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -178075,7 +178075,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2853, - "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \\n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \\n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \\n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", + "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -178093,7 +178093,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2853, - "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \\n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \\n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \\n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", + "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -178111,7 +178111,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2853, - "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \\n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \\n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \\n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", + "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -178129,7 +178129,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2853, - "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \\n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \\n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \\n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", + "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -178140,14 +178140,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1. Planning assessments", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups.", + "Sentence": "\n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups.", "newParagraph": "situation analysis action planning hiv include following important component n baseline data national hivaids prevalence usually based sentinel surveillance pregnant woman rate stis significant difference different area country generalized epidemic restricted highrisk group data available blood donor donor routinely tested highrisk group driving epidemic example heterosexual sex men sex men poor medical procedure blood transfusion mothertochild transmission intravenous drug use regional status epidemic especially neighbouring country may provided external base excombatants n knowledge attitude vulnerability qualitative data obtained key formant interview focus group discussion include health community worker religious leader woman youth group government official un agency ngocbos well excombatants associated fighting force group sometimes data knowledge attitude practice regarding hiv aid contained demographic health survey regularly carried many country although may interrupted conflict important identify factor may increase vulnerability hiv level rape genderbased violence extent survival sex planning process cultural sensitivity participant beneficiary must considered appropriate service designed within given country example acceptability trend condom use attitude sexual relation outside marriage vary enormously country specific context must inform design programme understanding local perception also important order prevent problem reintegration phase example case community may blame excombatants woman associated fighting force spread hiv therefore stigmatize n identify existing capacity assessment need map existing health care facility around community reintegration going take place exercise ascertain whether country functioning national aid control strategy programme extent ministry engaged go beyond health ministry include example ministry interior defence education etc prevention awareness programme place directed specific group capacity counselling testing exist strategy rollout arvs financial support available pending global fund aid malaria tb u president emergency plan aid relief world bank assistance framework include ddr actor national international present country un theme group technical working group place standard mechanism coordinate hiv initiative un agency", "ProcessedSent": "n knowledge attitude vulnerability qualitative data obtained key formant interview focus group discussion include health community worker religious leader woman youth group government official un agency ngocbos well excombatants associated fighting force group", "SentID": 9896 }, { "ParagraphID": 2853, - "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \\n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \\n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \\n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", + "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -178165,7 +178165,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2853, - "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \\n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \\n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \\n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", + "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -178183,7 +178183,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2853, - "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \\n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \\n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \\n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", + "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -178201,7 +178201,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2853, - "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \\n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \\n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \\n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", + "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -178219,7 +178219,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2853, - "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \\n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \\n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \\n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", + "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -178237,7 +178237,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2853, - "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \\n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \\n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \\n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", + "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -178248,14 +178248,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1. Planning assessments", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place.", + "Sentence": "\n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place.", "newParagraph": "situation analysis action planning hiv include following important component n baseline data national hivaids prevalence usually based sentinel surveillance pregnant woman rate stis significant difference different area country generalized epidemic restricted highrisk group data available blood donor donor routinely tested highrisk group driving epidemic example heterosexual sex men sex men poor medical procedure blood transfusion mothertochild transmission intravenous drug use regional status epidemic especially neighbouring country may provided external base excombatants n knowledge attitude vulnerability qualitative data obtained key formant interview focus group discussion include health community worker religious leader woman youth group government official un agency ngocbos well excombatants associated fighting force group sometimes data knowledge attitude practice regarding hiv aid contained demographic health survey regularly carried many country although may interrupted conflict important identify factor may increase vulnerability hiv level rape genderbased violence extent survival sex planning process cultural sensitivity participant beneficiary must considered appropriate service designed within given country example acceptability trend condom use attitude sexual relation outside marriage vary enormously country specific context must inform design programme understanding local perception also important order prevent problem reintegration phase example case community may blame excombatants woman associated fighting force spread hiv therefore stigmatize n identify existing capacity assessment need map existing health care facility around community reintegration going take place exercise ascertain whether country functioning national aid control strategy programme extent ministry engaged go beyond health ministry include example ministry interior defence education etc prevention awareness programme place directed specific group capacity counselling testing exist strategy rollout arvs financial support available pending global fund aid malaria tb u president emergency plan aid relief world bank assistance framework include ddr actor national international present country un theme group technical working group place standard mechanism coordinate hiv initiative un agency", "ProcessedSent": "n identify existing capacity assessment need map existing health care facility around community reintegration going take place", "SentID": 9902 }, { "ParagraphID": 2853, - "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \\n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \\n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \\n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", + "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -178273,7 +178273,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2853, - "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \\n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \\n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \\n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", + "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -178291,7 +178291,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2853, - "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \\n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \\n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \\n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", + "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -178309,7 +178309,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2853, - "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \\n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \\n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \\n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", + "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -178327,7 +178327,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2853, - "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \\n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \\n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \\n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", + "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -178345,7 +178345,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2853, - "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \\n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \\n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \\n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", + "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -178363,7 +178363,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2853, - "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \\n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \\n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \\n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", + "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -178381,7 +178381,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2853, - "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \\n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \\n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \\n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", + "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -178399,7 +178399,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2853, - "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \\n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \\n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \\n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", + "Paragraph": "A situation analysis for action planning for HIV should include the following important components: \n Baseline data: What is the national HIV\/AIDS prevalence (usually based on sentinel surveillance of pregnant women)? What are the rates of STIs? Are there significant differences in different areas of the country? Is it a generalized epidemic or restricted to high-risk groups? What data are available from blood donors (are donors routinely tested)? What are the high-risk groups? What is driving the epidemic (for example: heterosexual sex; men who have sex with men; poor medical procedures and blood transfusions; mother-to-child transmission; intravenous drug use)? What is the regional status of the epidemic, especially in neighbouring countries that may have provided an external base for ex-combatants? \n Knowledge, attitudes and vulnerability: Qualitative data can be obtained through key in- formant interviews and focus group discussions that include health and community workers, religious leaders, women and youth groups, government officials, UN agency and NGO\/CBOs, as well as ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces and groups. Sometimes data on knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding HIV\/ AIDS are contained in demographic and health surveys that are regularly carried out in many countries (although these may have been interrupted because of the conflict). It is important to identify the factors that may increase vulnerability to HIV \u2014 such as levels of rape and gender-based violence and the extent of \u2018survival sex\u2019. In the planning process, the cultural sensitivities of participants and beneficiaries must be considered so that appropriate services can be designed. Within a given country, for example, the acceptability and trends of condom use or attitudes to sexual relations outside of marriage can vary enormously; the country specific context must inform the design of programmes. Understanding local perceptions is also important in order to prevent problems during the reintegration phase, for example in cases where communities may blame ex-com-batants or women associated with fighting forces for the spread of HIV and therefore stigmatize them. \n Identify existing capacities: The assessment needs to map existing health care facilities in and around communities where reintegration is going to take place. The exercise should ascertain whether the country has a functioning national AIDS control strategy and programme, and the extent that ministries are engaged (this should go beyond just the health ministry and include, for example, ministries of the interior, defence, education, etc.). Are there prevention and awareness programmes in place? Are these directed at specific groups? Does any capacity for counselling and testing exist? Is there a strategy for the roll-out of ARVs? Is there financial support available or pending from the Global Fund for AIDS, Malaria and TB, the US President\u2019s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief or the World Bank? Do these assistance frameworks include DDR? What other actors (national and international) are present in the country? Are the UN theme group and technical working group in place ( the standard mechanisms to coordinate the HIV initiatives of UN agencies)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -178417,7 +178417,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2854, - "Paragraph": "Basic requirements for HIV\/AIDS programmes in DDR include: \\n collection of baseline HIV\/AIDS data; \\n identification and training of HIV focal points within DDR field offices; \\n development of HIV\/AIDS awareness material and provision of basic awareness train- ing, with peer education programmes during extended cantonment and the reinsertion and reintegration phases to build capacity; \\n provision of VCT, both specifically within cantonment sites, where relevant, and through support to community services, and the routine offer of (opt-in) testing with counselling as a standard part of medical screening in countries with an HIV prevalence of 5 per- cent or more; \\n provision of condoms, PEP kits, and awareness material; \\n treatment of STIs and opportunistic infections, and referral to existing services for ARV treatment; \\n public information campaigns and sensitization of receiving communities as part of more general preparations for the return of DDR participants.", + "Paragraph": "Basic requirements for HIV\/AIDS programmes in DDR include: \n collection of baseline HIV\/AIDS data; \n identification and training of HIV focal points within DDR field offices; \n development of HIV\/AIDS awareness material and provision of basic awareness train- ing, with peer education programmes during extended cantonment and the reinsertion and reintegration phases to build capacity; \n provision of VCT, both specifically within cantonment sites, where relevant, and through support to community services, and the routine offer of (opt-in) testing with counselling as a standard part of medical screening in countries with an HIV prevalence of 5 per- cent or more; \n provision of condoms, PEP kits, and awareness material; \n treatment of STIs and opportunistic infections, and referral to existing services for ARV treatment; \n public information campaigns and sensitization of receiving communities as part of more general preparations for the return of DDR participants.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -178428,7 +178428,7 @@ "Heading2": "7.1. Planning assessments", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Basic requirements for HIV\/AIDS programmes in DDR include: \\n collection of baseline HIV\/AIDS data; \\n identification and training of HIV focal points within DDR field offices; \\n development of HIV\/AIDS awareness material and provision of basic awareness train- ing, with peer education programmes during extended cantonment and the reinsertion and reintegration phases to build capacity; \\n provision of VCT, both specifically within cantonment sites, where relevant, and through support to community services, and the routine offer of (opt-in) testing with counselling as a standard part of medical screening in countries with an HIV prevalence of 5 per- cent or more; \\n provision of condoms, PEP kits, and awareness material; \\n treatment of STIs and opportunistic infections, and referral to existing services for ARV treatment; \\n public information campaigns and sensitization of receiving communities as part of more general preparations for the return of DDR participants.", + "Sentence": "Basic requirements for HIV\/AIDS programmes in DDR include: \n collection of baseline HIV\/AIDS data; \n identification and training of HIV focal points within DDR field offices; \n development of HIV\/AIDS awareness material and provision of basic awareness train- ing, with peer education programmes during extended cantonment and the reinsertion and reintegration phases to build capacity; \n provision of VCT, both specifically within cantonment sites, where relevant, and through support to community services, and the routine offer of (opt-in) testing with counselling as a standard part of medical screening in countries with an HIV prevalence of 5 per- cent or more; \n provision of condoms, PEP kits, and awareness material; \n treatment of STIs and opportunistic infections, and referral to existing services for ARV treatment; \n public information campaigns and sensitization of receiving communities as part of more general preparations for the return of DDR participants.", "newParagraph": "basic requirement hivaids programme ddr include n collection baseline hivaids data n identification training hiv focal point within ddr field office n development hivaids awareness material provision basic awareness train ing peer education programme extended cantonment reinsertion reintegration phase build capacity n provision vct specifically within cantonment site relevant support community service routine offer optin testing counselling standard part medical screening country hiv prevalence 5 per cent n provision condom pep kit awareness material n treatment stis opportunistic infection referral existing service arv treatment n public information campaign sensitization receiving community part general preparation return ddr participant", "ProcessedSent": "basic requirement hivaids programme ddr include n collection baseline hivaids data n identification training hiv focal point within ddr field office n development hivaids awareness material provision basic awareness train ing peer education programme extended cantonment reinsertion reintegration phase build capacity n provision vct specifically within cantonment site relevant support community service routine offer optin testing counselling standard part medical screening country hiv prevalence 5 per cent n provision condom pep kit awareness material n treatment stis opportunistic infection referral existing service arv treatment n public information campaign sensitization receiving community part general preparation return ddr participant", "SentID": 9912 @@ -179389,7 +179389,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2868, - "Paragraph": "It is particularly important for pregnant women to know their HIV status, as this may affect the health of their baby. During counselling, information on mother-to-child-trans- mission, including short-course ARV therapy (to reduce the risk of transmission from an HIV-positive mother to the foetus), and guidance on breastfeeding can be provided. Testing technologies have improved significantly, cutting the time required to get a result and reduc- ing the reliance on laboratory facilities. It is therefore more feasible to include testing and counselling in DDR. Testing and counselling for children associated with armed forces and groups should only be carried out in consultation with a child-protection officer with, where possible, the informed consent of the parent (see IDDRS 5.30 on Children and DDR). \\n Training and funding of HIV counsellors: Based on an assessment of existing capacity, counsellors could include local medical personnel, religious leaders, NGOs and CBOs. Counselling capacity needs to be generated (where it does not already exist) and funded to ensure suffi- cient personnel to run VCT and testing being offered as part of routine health checks, either in cantonment sites or during community-based demobilization, and continued during rein- sertion and reintegration (see section 10.1 of this module).", + "Paragraph": "It is particularly important for pregnant women to know their HIV status, as this may affect the health of their baby. During counselling, information on mother-to-child-trans- mission, including short-course ARV therapy (to reduce the risk of transmission from an HIV-positive mother to the foetus), and guidance on breastfeeding can be provided. Testing technologies have improved significantly, cutting the time required to get a result and reduc- ing the reliance on laboratory facilities. It is therefore more feasible to include testing and counselling in DDR. Testing and counselling for children associated with armed forces and groups should only be carried out in consultation with a child-protection officer with, where possible, the informed consent of the parent (see IDDRS 5.30 on Children and DDR). \n Training and funding of HIV counsellors: Based on an assessment of existing capacity, counsellors could include local medical personnel, religious leaders, NGOs and CBOs. Counselling capacity needs to be generated (where it does not already exist) and funded to ensure suffi- cient personnel to run VCT and testing being offered as part of routine health checks, either in cantonment sites or during community-based demobilization, and continued during rein- sertion and reintegration (see section 10.1 of this module).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -179407,7 +179407,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2868, - "Paragraph": "It is particularly important for pregnant women to know their HIV status, as this may affect the health of their baby. During counselling, information on mother-to-child-trans- mission, including short-course ARV therapy (to reduce the risk of transmission from an HIV-positive mother to the foetus), and guidance on breastfeeding can be provided. Testing technologies have improved significantly, cutting the time required to get a result and reduc- ing the reliance on laboratory facilities. It is therefore more feasible to include testing and counselling in DDR. Testing and counselling for children associated with armed forces and groups should only be carried out in consultation with a child-protection officer with, where possible, the informed consent of the parent (see IDDRS 5.30 on Children and DDR). \\n Training and funding of HIV counsellors: Based on an assessment of existing capacity, counsellors could include local medical personnel, religious leaders, NGOs and CBOs. Counselling capacity needs to be generated (where it does not already exist) and funded to ensure suffi- cient personnel to run VCT and testing being offered as part of routine health checks, either in cantonment sites or during community-based demobilization, and continued during rein- sertion and reintegration (see section 10.1 of this module).", + "Paragraph": "It is particularly important for pregnant women to know their HIV status, as this may affect the health of their baby. During counselling, information on mother-to-child-trans- mission, including short-course ARV therapy (to reduce the risk of transmission from an HIV-positive mother to the foetus), and guidance on breastfeeding can be provided. Testing technologies have improved significantly, cutting the time required to get a result and reduc- ing the reliance on laboratory facilities. It is therefore more feasible to include testing and counselling in DDR. Testing and counselling for children associated with armed forces and groups should only be carried out in consultation with a child-protection officer with, where possible, the informed consent of the parent (see IDDRS 5.30 on Children and DDR). \n Training and funding of HIV counsellors: Based on an assessment of existing capacity, counsellors could include local medical personnel, religious leaders, NGOs and CBOs. Counselling capacity needs to be generated (where it does not already exist) and funded to ensure suffi- cient personnel to run VCT and testing being offered as part of routine health checks, either in cantonment sites or during community-based demobilization, and continued during rein- sertion and reintegration (see section 10.1 of this module).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -179425,7 +179425,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2868, - "Paragraph": "It is particularly important for pregnant women to know their HIV status, as this may affect the health of their baby. During counselling, information on mother-to-child-trans- mission, including short-course ARV therapy (to reduce the risk of transmission from an HIV-positive mother to the foetus), and guidance on breastfeeding can be provided. Testing technologies have improved significantly, cutting the time required to get a result and reduc- ing the reliance on laboratory facilities. It is therefore more feasible to include testing and counselling in DDR. Testing and counselling for children associated with armed forces and groups should only be carried out in consultation with a child-protection officer with, where possible, the informed consent of the parent (see IDDRS 5.30 on Children and DDR). \\n Training and funding of HIV counsellors: Based on an assessment of existing capacity, counsellors could include local medical personnel, religious leaders, NGOs and CBOs. Counselling capacity needs to be generated (where it does not already exist) and funded to ensure suffi- cient personnel to run VCT and testing being offered as part of routine health checks, either in cantonment sites or during community-based demobilization, and continued during rein- sertion and reintegration (see section 10.1 of this module).", + "Paragraph": "It is particularly important for pregnant women to know their HIV status, as this may affect the health of their baby. During counselling, information on mother-to-child-trans- mission, including short-course ARV therapy (to reduce the risk of transmission from an HIV-positive mother to the foetus), and guidance on breastfeeding can be provided. Testing technologies have improved significantly, cutting the time required to get a result and reduc- ing the reliance on laboratory facilities. It is therefore more feasible to include testing and counselling in DDR. Testing and counselling for children associated with armed forces and groups should only be carried out in consultation with a child-protection officer with, where possible, the informed consent of the parent (see IDDRS 5.30 on Children and DDR). \n Training and funding of HIV counsellors: Based on an assessment of existing capacity, counsellors could include local medical personnel, religious leaders, NGOs and CBOs. Counselling capacity needs to be generated (where it does not already exist) and funded to ensure suffi- cient personnel to run VCT and testing being offered as part of routine health checks, either in cantonment sites or during community-based demobilization, and continued during rein- sertion and reintegration (see section 10.1 of this module).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -179443,7 +179443,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2868, - "Paragraph": "It is particularly important for pregnant women to know their HIV status, as this may affect the health of their baby. During counselling, information on mother-to-child-trans- mission, including short-course ARV therapy (to reduce the risk of transmission from an HIV-positive mother to the foetus), and guidance on breastfeeding can be provided. Testing technologies have improved significantly, cutting the time required to get a result and reduc- ing the reliance on laboratory facilities. It is therefore more feasible to include testing and counselling in DDR. Testing and counselling for children associated with armed forces and groups should only be carried out in consultation with a child-protection officer with, where possible, the informed consent of the parent (see IDDRS 5.30 on Children and DDR). \\n Training and funding of HIV counsellors: Based on an assessment of existing capacity, counsellors could include local medical personnel, religious leaders, NGOs and CBOs. Counselling capacity needs to be generated (where it does not already exist) and funded to ensure suffi- cient personnel to run VCT and testing being offered as part of routine health checks, either in cantonment sites or during community-based demobilization, and continued during rein- sertion and reintegration (see section 10.1 of this module).", + "Paragraph": "It is particularly important for pregnant women to know their HIV status, as this may affect the health of their baby. During counselling, information on mother-to-child-trans- mission, including short-course ARV therapy (to reduce the risk of transmission from an HIV-positive mother to the foetus), and guidance on breastfeeding can be provided. Testing technologies have improved significantly, cutting the time required to get a result and reduc- ing the reliance on laboratory facilities. It is therefore more feasible to include testing and counselling in DDR. Testing and counselling for children associated with armed forces and groups should only be carried out in consultation with a child-protection officer with, where possible, the informed consent of the parent (see IDDRS 5.30 on Children and DDR). \n Training and funding of HIV counsellors: Based on an assessment of existing capacity, counsellors could include local medical personnel, religious leaders, NGOs and CBOs. Counselling capacity needs to be generated (where it does not already exist) and funded to ensure suffi- cient personnel to run VCT and testing being offered as part of routine health checks, either in cantonment sites or during community-based demobilization, and continued during rein- sertion and reintegration (see section 10.1 of this module).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -179461,7 +179461,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2868, - "Paragraph": "It is particularly important for pregnant women to know their HIV status, as this may affect the health of their baby. During counselling, information on mother-to-child-trans- mission, including short-course ARV therapy (to reduce the risk of transmission from an HIV-positive mother to the foetus), and guidance on breastfeeding can be provided. Testing technologies have improved significantly, cutting the time required to get a result and reduc- ing the reliance on laboratory facilities. It is therefore more feasible to include testing and counselling in DDR. Testing and counselling for children associated with armed forces and groups should only be carried out in consultation with a child-protection officer with, where possible, the informed consent of the parent (see IDDRS 5.30 on Children and DDR). \\n Training and funding of HIV counsellors: Based on an assessment of existing capacity, counsellors could include local medical personnel, religious leaders, NGOs and CBOs. Counselling capacity needs to be generated (where it does not already exist) and funded to ensure suffi- cient personnel to run VCT and testing being offered as part of routine health checks, either in cantonment sites or during community-based demobilization, and continued during rein- sertion and reintegration (see section 10.1 of this module).", + "Paragraph": "It is particularly important for pregnant women to know their HIV status, as this may affect the health of their baby. During counselling, information on mother-to-child-trans- mission, including short-course ARV therapy (to reduce the risk of transmission from an HIV-positive mother to the foetus), and guidance on breastfeeding can be provided. Testing technologies have improved significantly, cutting the time required to get a result and reduc- ing the reliance on laboratory facilities. It is therefore more feasible to include testing and counselling in DDR. Testing and counselling for children associated with armed forces and groups should only be carried out in consultation with a child-protection officer with, where possible, the informed consent of the parent (see IDDRS 5.30 on Children and DDR). \n Training and funding of HIV counsellors: Based on an assessment of existing capacity, counsellors could include local medical personnel, religious leaders, NGOs and CBOs. Counselling capacity needs to be generated (where it does not already exist) and funded to ensure suffi- cient personnel to run VCT and testing being offered as part of routine health checks, either in cantonment sites or during community-based demobilization, and continued during rein- sertion and reintegration (see section 10.1 of this module).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -179479,7 +179479,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2868, - "Paragraph": "It is particularly important for pregnant women to know their HIV status, as this may affect the health of their baby. During counselling, information on mother-to-child-trans- mission, including short-course ARV therapy (to reduce the risk of transmission from an HIV-positive mother to the foetus), and guidance on breastfeeding can be provided. Testing technologies have improved significantly, cutting the time required to get a result and reduc- ing the reliance on laboratory facilities. It is therefore more feasible to include testing and counselling in DDR. Testing and counselling for children associated with armed forces and groups should only be carried out in consultation with a child-protection officer with, where possible, the informed consent of the parent (see IDDRS 5.30 on Children and DDR). \\n Training and funding of HIV counsellors: Based on an assessment of existing capacity, counsellors could include local medical personnel, religious leaders, NGOs and CBOs. Counselling capacity needs to be generated (where it does not already exist) and funded to ensure suffi- cient personnel to run VCT and testing being offered as part of routine health checks, either in cantonment sites or during community-based demobilization, and continued during rein- sertion and reintegration (see section 10.1 of this module).", + "Paragraph": "It is particularly important for pregnant women to know their HIV status, as this may affect the health of their baby. During counselling, information on mother-to-child-trans- mission, including short-course ARV therapy (to reduce the risk of transmission from an HIV-positive mother to the foetus), and guidance on breastfeeding can be provided. Testing technologies have improved significantly, cutting the time required to get a result and reduc- ing the reliance on laboratory facilities. It is therefore more feasible to include testing and counselling in DDR. Testing and counselling for children associated with armed forces and groups should only be carried out in consultation with a child-protection officer with, where possible, the informed consent of the parent (see IDDRS 5.30 on Children and DDR). \n Training and funding of HIV counsellors: Based on an assessment of existing capacity, counsellors could include local medical personnel, religious leaders, NGOs and CBOs. Counselling capacity needs to be generated (where it does not already exist) and funded to ensure suffi- cient personnel to run VCT and testing being offered as part of routine health checks, either in cantonment sites or during community-based demobilization, and continued during rein- sertion and reintegration (see section 10.1 of this module).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -179490,14 +179490,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.4. HIV counselling and testing", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Training and funding of HIV counsellors: Based on an assessment of existing capacity, counsellors could include local medical personnel, religious leaders, NGOs and CBOs.", + "Sentence": "\n Training and funding of HIV counsellors: Based on an assessment of existing capacity, counsellors could include local medical personnel, religious leaders, NGOs and CBOs.", "newParagraph": "particularly important pregnant woman know hiv status may affect health baby counselling information mothertochildtrans mission including shortcourse arv therapy reduce risk transmission hivpositive mother foetus guidance breastfeeding provided testing technology improved significantly cutting time required get result reduc ing reliance laboratory facility therefore feasible include testing counselling ddr testing counselling child associated armed force group carried consultation childprotection officer possible informed consent parent see iddrs 530 child ddr n training funding hiv counsellor based assessment existing capacity counsellor could include local medical personnel religious leader ngo cbos counselling capacity need generated already exist funded ensure suffi cient personnel run vct testing offered part routine health check either cantonment site communitybased demobilization continued rein sertion reintegration see section 101 module", "ProcessedSent": "n training funding hiv counsellor based assessment existing capacity counsellor could include local medical personnel religious leader ngo cbos", "SentID": 9971 }, { "ParagraphID": 2868, - "Paragraph": "It is particularly important for pregnant women to know their HIV status, as this may affect the health of their baby. During counselling, information on mother-to-child-trans- mission, including short-course ARV therapy (to reduce the risk of transmission from an HIV-positive mother to the foetus), and guidance on breastfeeding can be provided. Testing technologies have improved significantly, cutting the time required to get a result and reduc- ing the reliance on laboratory facilities. It is therefore more feasible to include testing and counselling in DDR. Testing and counselling for children associated with armed forces and groups should only be carried out in consultation with a child-protection officer with, where possible, the informed consent of the parent (see IDDRS 5.30 on Children and DDR). \\n Training and funding of HIV counsellors: Based on an assessment of existing capacity, counsellors could include local medical personnel, religious leaders, NGOs and CBOs. Counselling capacity needs to be generated (where it does not already exist) and funded to ensure suffi- cient personnel to run VCT and testing being offered as part of routine health checks, either in cantonment sites or during community-based demobilization, and continued during rein- sertion and reintegration (see section 10.1 of this module).", + "Paragraph": "It is particularly important for pregnant women to know their HIV status, as this may affect the health of their baby. During counselling, information on mother-to-child-trans- mission, including short-course ARV therapy (to reduce the risk of transmission from an HIV-positive mother to the foetus), and guidance on breastfeeding can be provided. Testing technologies have improved significantly, cutting the time required to get a result and reduc- ing the reliance on laboratory facilities. It is therefore more feasible to include testing and counselling in DDR. Testing and counselling for children associated with armed forces and groups should only be carried out in consultation with a child-protection officer with, where possible, the informed consent of the parent (see IDDRS 5.30 on Children and DDR). \n Training and funding of HIV counsellors: Based on an assessment of existing capacity, counsellors could include local medical personnel, religious leaders, NGOs and CBOs. Counselling capacity needs to be generated (where it does not already exist) and funded to ensure suffi- cient personnel to run VCT and testing being offered as part of routine health checks, either in cantonment sites or during community-based demobilization, and continued during rein- sertion and reintegration (see section 10.1 of this module).", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -180181,7 +180181,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2878, - "Paragraph": "The DDR programme should plan and budget for the following initiatives: \\n Community capacity-enhancement and public information programmes: These involve pro- viding training for local government, NGOs\/community-based organizations (CBOs) and faith-based organizations to support forums for communities to talk openly about HIV\/AIDS and related issues of stigma, discrimination, gender and power relations; the issue of men having sex with men; taboos and fears. This enables communities to better define their needs and address concerns about real or perceived HIV rates among returning ex-combatants. Public information campaigns should raise awareness among communities, but it is important that communication strategies do not inadvertently increase stigma and discrimination. HIV\/AIDS should be approached as an issue of concern for the entire community and not something that only affects those being demobilized; \\n Maintain counsellor and peer educator capacity: training and funding is needed to maintain VCT and peer education programmes.", + "Paragraph": "The DDR programme should plan and budget for the following initiatives: \n Community capacity-enhancement and public information programmes: These involve pro- viding training for local government, NGOs\/community-based organizations (CBOs) and faith-based organizations to support forums for communities to talk openly about HIV\/AIDS and related issues of stigma, discrimination, gender and power relations; the issue of men having sex with men; taboos and fears. This enables communities to better define their needs and address concerns about real or perceived HIV rates among returning ex-combatants. Public information campaigns should raise awareness among communities, but it is important that communication strategies do not inadvertently increase stigma and discrimination. HIV\/AIDS should be approached as an issue of concern for the entire community and not something that only affects those being demobilized; \n Maintain counsellor and peer educator capacity: training and funding is needed to maintain VCT and peer education programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -180192,14 +180192,14 @@ "Heading2": "9.1. Planning and preparation in receiving communities", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The DDR programme should plan and budget for the following initiatives: \\n Community capacity-enhancement and public information programmes: These involve pro- viding training for local government, NGOs\/community-based organizations (CBOs) and faith-based organizations to support forums for communities to talk openly about HIV\/AIDS and related issues of stigma, discrimination, gender and power relations; the issue of men having sex with men; taboos and fears.", + "Sentence": "The DDR programme should plan and budget for the following initiatives: \n Community capacity-enhancement and public information programmes: These involve pro- viding training for local government, NGOs\/community-based organizations (CBOs) and faith-based organizations to support forums for communities to talk openly about HIV\/AIDS and related issues of stigma, discrimination, gender and power relations; the issue of men having sex with men; taboos and fears.", "newParagraph": "ddr programme plan budget following initiative n community capacityenhancement public information programme involve pro viding training local government ngoscommunitybased organization cbos faithbased organization support forum community talk openly hivaids related issue stigma discrimination gender power relation issue men sex men taboo fear enables community better define need address concern real perceived hiv rate among returning excombatants public information campaign raise awareness among community important communication strategy inadvertently increase stigma discrimination hivaids approached issue concern entire community something affect demobilized n maintain counsellor peer educator capacity training funding needed maintain vct peer education programme", "ProcessedSent": "ddr programme plan budget following initiative n community capacityenhancement public information programme involve pro viding training local government ngoscommunitybased organization cbos faithbased organization support forum community talk openly hivaids related issue stigma discrimination gender power relation issue men sex men taboo fear", "SentID": 10010 }, { "ParagraphID": 2878, - "Paragraph": "The DDR programme should plan and budget for the following initiatives: \\n Community capacity-enhancement and public information programmes: These involve pro- viding training for local government, NGOs\/community-based organizations (CBOs) and faith-based organizations to support forums for communities to talk openly about HIV\/AIDS and related issues of stigma, discrimination, gender and power relations; the issue of men having sex with men; taboos and fears. This enables communities to better define their needs and address concerns about real or perceived HIV rates among returning ex-combatants. Public information campaigns should raise awareness among communities, but it is important that communication strategies do not inadvertently increase stigma and discrimination. HIV\/AIDS should be approached as an issue of concern for the entire community and not something that only affects those being demobilized; \\n Maintain counsellor and peer educator capacity: training and funding is needed to maintain VCT and peer education programmes.", + "Paragraph": "The DDR programme should plan and budget for the following initiatives: \n Community capacity-enhancement and public information programmes: These involve pro- viding training for local government, NGOs\/community-based organizations (CBOs) and faith-based organizations to support forums for communities to talk openly about HIV\/AIDS and related issues of stigma, discrimination, gender and power relations; the issue of men having sex with men; taboos and fears. This enables communities to better define their needs and address concerns about real or perceived HIV rates among returning ex-combatants. Public information campaigns should raise awareness among communities, but it is important that communication strategies do not inadvertently increase stigma and discrimination. HIV\/AIDS should be approached as an issue of concern for the entire community and not something that only affects those being demobilized; \n Maintain counsellor and peer educator capacity: training and funding is needed to maintain VCT and peer education programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -180217,7 +180217,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2878, - "Paragraph": "The DDR programme should plan and budget for the following initiatives: \\n Community capacity-enhancement and public information programmes: These involve pro- viding training for local government, NGOs\/community-based organizations (CBOs) and faith-based organizations to support forums for communities to talk openly about HIV\/AIDS and related issues of stigma, discrimination, gender and power relations; the issue of men having sex with men; taboos and fears. This enables communities to better define their needs and address concerns about real or perceived HIV rates among returning ex-combatants. Public information campaigns should raise awareness among communities, but it is important that communication strategies do not inadvertently increase stigma and discrimination. HIV\/AIDS should be approached as an issue of concern for the entire community and not something that only affects those being demobilized; \\n Maintain counsellor and peer educator capacity: training and funding is needed to maintain VCT and peer education programmes.", + "Paragraph": "The DDR programme should plan and budget for the following initiatives: \n Community capacity-enhancement and public information programmes: These involve pro- viding training for local government, NGOs\/community-based organizations (CBOs) and faith-based organizations to support forums for communities to talk openly about HIV\/AIDS and related issues of stigma, discrimination, gender and power relations; the issue of men having sex with men; taboos and fears. This enables communities to better define their needs and address concerns about real or perceived HIV rates among returning ex-combatants. Public information campaigns should raise awareness among communities, but it is important that communication strategies do not inadvertently increase stigma and discrimination. HIV\/AIDS should be approached as an issue of concern for the entire community and not something that only affects those being demobilized; \n Maintain counsellor and peer educator capacity: training and funding is needed to maintain VCT and peer education programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -180235,7 +180235,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2878, - "Paragraph": "The DDR programme should plan and budget for the following initiatives: \\n Community capacity-enhancement and public information programmes: These involve pro- viding training for local government, NGOs\/community-based organizations (CBOs) and faith-based organizations to support forums for communities to talk openly about HIV\/AIDS and related issues of stigma, discrimination, gender and power relations; the issue of men having sex with men; taboos and fears. This enables communities to better define their needs and address concerns about real or perceived HIV rates among returning ex-combatants. Public information campaigns should raise awareness among communities, but it is important that communication strategies do not inadvertently increase stigma and discrimination. HIV\/AIDS should be approached as an issue of concern for the entire community and not something that only affects those being demobilized; \\n Maintain counsellor and peer educator capacity: training and funding is needed to maintain VCT and peer education programmes.", + "Paragraph": "The DDR programme should plan and budget for the following initiatives: \n Community capacity-enhancement and public information programmes: These involve pro- viding training for local government, NGOs\/community-based organizations (CBOs) and faith-based organizations to support forums for communities to talk openly about HIV\/AIDS and related issues of stigma, discrimination, gender and power relations; the issue of men having sex with men; taboos and fears. This enables communities to better define their needs and address concerns about real or perceived HIV rates among returning ex-combatants. Public information campaigns should raise awareness among communities, but it is important that communication strategies do not inadvertently increase stigma and discrimination. HIV\/AIDS should be approached as an issue of concern for the entire community and not something that only affects those being demobilized; \n Maintain counsellor and peer educator capacity: training and funding is needed to maintain VCT and peer education programmes.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -180246,7 +180246,7 @@ "Heading2": "9.1. Planning and preparation in receiving communities", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "HIV\/AIDS should be approached as an issue of concern for the entire community and not something that only affects those being demobilized; \\n Maintain counsellor and peer educator capacity: training and funding is needed to maintain VCT and peer education programmes.", + "Sentence": "HIV\/AIDS should be approached as an issue of concern for the entire community and not something that only affects those being demobilized; \n Maintain counsellor and peer educator capacity: training and funding is needed to maintain VCT and peer education programmes.", "newParagraph": "ddr programme plan budget following initiative n community capacityenhancement public information programme involve pro viding training local government ngoscommunitybased organization cbos faithbased organization support forum community talk openly hivaids related issue stigma discrimination gender power relation issue men sex men taboo fear enables community better define need address concern real perceived hiv rate among returning excombatants public information campaign raise awareness among community important communication strategy inadvertently increase stigma discrimination hivaids approached issue concern entire community something affect demobilized n maintain counsellor peer educator capacity training funding needed maintain vct peer education programme", "ProcessedSent": "hivaids approached issue concern entire community something affect demobilized n maintain counsellor peer educator capacity training funding needed maintain vct peer education programme", "SentID": 10013 @@ -181153,7 +181153,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181164,14 +181164,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases.", + "Sentence": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases.", "newParagraph": "term definition nn aid acquired immune deficiency syndrome stage hiv immune system depleted leaving body vulnerable one lifethreatening disease nn antiretrovirals arvs broad term main type treatment hiv aid arvs cure nn behaviourchange communication bcc participatory communitylevel process aimed developing positive behaviour promoting sustaining individual community societal behaviour change maintaining appropriate behaviour nn false negativepositive hiv test result wrong either giving negative result person hivpositive positive result person hivnegative nn hiv human immunodeficiency virus virus cause aid nn hiv confirmation test according whounaids recommendation positive hiv test result whether elisa enzymelinked immunabsorbent assay simplerapid test confirmed using second different test confirm accuracy two dif ferent rapid test laboratory facility available nn hiv counselling counselling generally offered hiv test order help individual understand risk behaviour cope hivpositive result stay hivnegative counselling service also link individual option treatment care support provides information stay healthy possible minimize risk transmission others test result shall confidential usually vol untary counselling testing service package ensures hiv test voluntary pre post test counselling offered informed consent obtained agreement medical test procedure clear explanation risk benefit hiv test performed using approved hiv test kit following testing protocol nn hivnegative result hiv test detect antibody blood either mean person infected virus time test heshe window period ie false negative see mean heshe immune virus nn hivpositive result positive hiv test result mean person hiv antibody hisher blood infected hiv mean heshe aid hiv test usually test presence antibody two main method hiv testing n hiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply n simplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa rapid test usually give result approximately 30 minute easy perform suitable combination three simplerapid test recommended facility elisa elisawestern blot testing available nn inconclusive indeterminate result small percentage hiv test result inconclu sive mean result neither positive negative may due number factor related hiv infection person early stage infection insufficient hiv antibody present give positive result happens test must repeated nn information education communication iec development communication strategy support material based formative research designed impact level knowledge influence behaviour among specific group nn mandatory testing testing screening required federal state local law compel individual submit hiv testing without informed consent within country conduct mandatory testing usually limited specific population cat egories health care provider member military prisoner people highrisk situation nn nutritional requirement aid patient usually need food intake 30 percent higher standard recommended level nn opportunistic infection oi infection occurs immune system weakened might cause disease serious person properly func tioning immune system nn peer education popular concept variously refers approach communication channel methodology andor intervention strategy peer education usually involves training supporting member given group background experience value effect change among member group often used influence knowledge attitude belief behaviour individual level however peer educa tion may also create change group societal level modifying norm stimulating collective action contributes change policy programme worldwide peer education one widely used hivaids awareness strategy nn postexposure prophylaxispostexposure prevention pep shortterm antiretroviral treatment reduce likelihood hiv infection potential exposure infected body fluid needlestick injury result rape treatment administered qualified health care practitioner essentially consists taking high dos arvs 28 day effective treatment must start within 2 72 hour possible exposure earlier treatment started effective success rate varies nn routine optin testing approach testing whereby individual offered hiv test standard part treatmenthealth check heshe receive indivi dual informed heshe right decide whether undergo test nn sentinel surveillance surveillance based selected population sample chosen repre sent relevant experience particular group nn seroconversion period blood start producing detectable antibody response hiv infection nn seropositive hiv antibody hivpositive nn sexually transmitted infection sti disease commonly transmitted vaginal oral anal sex presence sti indicative risk behaviour also increase actual risk contracting hiv nn sti syndromic management costeffective approach allows health worker diag nose sexually transmitted infection basis patient history symptom without need laboratory analysis treatment normally includes use broadspectrum antibiotic nn universal precaution simple infection control measure reduce risk transmis sion blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person n use new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recom mended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equip ment available n discard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full n document quality sterilization medical equipment used percuta neous procedure n wash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid n disinfect instrument contaminated equipment n handle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little po sible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water nn voluntary hiv testing clientinitiated hiv test whereby individual chooses go testing facilityprovider find hisher hiv status nn window period time period initial infection hiv body pro duction antibody three month time hiv test antibody may negative even though person virus infect others", "ProcessedSent": "term definition nn aid acquired immune deficiency syndrome stage hiv immune system depleted leaving body vulnerable one lifethreatening disease", "SentID": 10064 }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181182,14 +181182,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS.", "newParagraph": "term definition nn aid acquired immune deficiency syndrome stage hiv immune system depleted leaving body vulnerable one lifethreatening disease nn antiretrovirals arvs broad term main type treatment hiv aid arvs cure nn behaviourchange communication bcc participatory communitylevel process aimed developing positive behaviour promoting sustaining individual community societal behaviour change maintaining appropriate behaviour nn false negativepositive hiv test result wrong either giving negative result person hivpositive positive result person hivnegative nn hiv human immunodeficiency virus virus cause aid nn hiv confirmation test according whounaids recommendation positive hiv test result whether elisa enzymelinked immunabsorbent assay simplerapid test confirmed using second different test confirm accuracy two dif ferent rapid test laboratory facility available nn hiv counselling counselling generally offered hiv test order help individual understand risk behaviour cope hivpositive result stay hivnegative counselling service also link individual option treatment care support provides information stay healthy possible minimize risk transmission others test result shall confidential usually vol untary counselling testing service package ensures hiv test voluntary pre post test counselling offered informed consent obtained agreement medical test procedure clear explanation risk benefit hiv test performed using approved hiv test kit following testing protocol nn hivnegative result hiv test detect antibody blood either mean person infected virus time test heshe window period ie false negative see mean heshe immune virus nn hivpositive result positive hiv test result mean person hiv antibody hisher blood infected hiv mean heshe aid hiv test usually test presence antibody two main method hiv testing n hiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply n simplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa rapid test usually give result approximately 30 minute easy perform suitable combination three simplerapid test recommended facility elisa elisawestern blot testing available nn inconclusive indeterminate result small percentage hiv test result inconclu sive mean result neither positive negative may due number factor related hiv infection person early stage infection insufficient hiv antibody present give positive result happens test must repeated nn information education communication iec development communication strategy support material based formative research designed impact level knowledge influence behaviour among specific group nn mandatory testing testing screening required federal state local law compel individual submit hiv testing without informed consent within country conduct mandatory testing usually limited specific population cat egories health care provider member military prisoner people highrisk situation nn nutritional requirement aid patient usually need food intake 30 percent higher standard recommended level nn opportunistic infection oi infection occurs immune system weakened might cause disease serious person properly func tioning immune system nn peer education popular concept variously refers approach communication channel methodology andor intervention strategy peer education usually involves training supporting member given group background experience value effect change among member group often used influence knowledge attitude belief behaviour individual level however peer educa tion may also create change group societal level modifying norm stimulating collective action contributes change policy programme worldwide peer education one widely used hivaids awareness strategy nn postexposure prophylaxispostexposure prevention pep shortterm antiretroviral treatment reduce likelihood hiv infection potential exposure infected body fluid needlestick injury result rape treatment administered qualified health care practitioner essentially consists taking high dos arvs 28 day effective treatment must start within 2 72 hour possible exposure earlier treatment started effective success rate varies nn routine optin testing approach testing whereby individual offered hiv test standard part treatmenthealth check heshe receive indivi dual informed heshe right decide whether undergo test nn sentinel surveillance surveillance based selected population sample chosen repre sent relevant experience particular group nn seroconversion period blood start producing detectable antibody response hiv infection nn seropositive hiv antibody hivpositive nn sexually transmitted infection sti disease commonly transmitted vaginal oral anal sex presence sti indicative risk behaviour also increase actual risk contracting hiv nn sti syndromic management costeffective approach allows health worker diag nose sexually transmitted infection basis patient history symptom without need laboratory analysis treatment normally includes use broadspectrum antibiotic nn universal precaution simple infection control measure reduce risk transmis sion blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person n use new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recom mended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equip ment available n discard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full n document quality sterilization medical equipment used percuta neous procedure n wash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid n disinfect instrument contaminated equipment n handle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little po sible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water nn voluntary hiv testing clientinitiated hiv test whereby individual chooses go testing facilityprovider find hisher hiv status nn window period time period initial infection hiv body pro duction antibody three month time hiv test antibody may negative even though person virus infect others", "ProcessedSent": "nn antiretrovirals arvs broad term main type treatment hiv aid", "SentID": 10065 }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181207,7 +181207,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181218,14 +181218,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours.", "newParagraph": "term definition nn aid acquired immune deficiency syndrome stage hiv immune system depleted leaving body vulnerable one lifethreatening disease nn antiretrovirals arvs broad term main type treatment hiv aid arvs cure nn behaviourchange communication bcc participatory communitylevel process aimed developing positive behaviour promoting sustaining individual community societal behaviour change maintaining appropriate behaviour nn false negativepositive hiv test result wrong either giving negative result person hivpositive positive result person hivnegative nn hiv human immunodeficiency virus virus cause aid nn hiv confirmation test according whounaids recommendation positive hiv test result whether elisa enzymelinked immunabsorbent assay simplerapid test confirmed using second different test confirm accuracy two dif ferent rapid test laboratory facility available nn hiv counselling counselling generally offered hiv test order help individual understand risk behaviour cope hivpositive result stay hivnegative counselling service also link individual option treatment care support provides information stay healthy possible minimize risk transmission others test result shall confidential usually vol untary counselling testing service package ensures hiv test voluntary pre post test counselling offered informed consent obtained agreement medical test procedure clear explanation risk benefit hiv test performed using approved hiv test kit following testing protocol nn hivnegative result hiv test detect antibody blood either mean person infected virus time test heshe window period ie false negative see mean heshe immune virus nn hivpositive result positive hiv test result mean person hiv antibody hisher blood infected hiv mean heshe aid hiv test usually test presence antibody two main method hiv testing n hiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply n simplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa rapid test usually give result approximately 30 minute easy perform suitable combination three simplerapid test recommended facility elisa elisawestern blot testing available nn inconclusive indeterminate result small percentage hiv test result inconclu sive mean result neither positive negative may due number factor related hiv infection person early stage infection insufficient hiv antibody present give positive result happens test must repeated nn information education communication iec development communication strategy support material based formative research designed impact level knowledge influence behaviour among specific group nn mandatory testing testing screening required federal state local law compel individual submit hiv testing without informed consent within country conduct mandatory testing usually limited specific population cat egories health care provider member military prisoner people highrisk situation nn nutritional requirement aid patient usually need food intake 30 percent higher standard recommended level nn opportunistic infection oi infection occurs immune system weakened might cause disease serious person properly func tioning immune system nn peer education popular concept variously refers approach communication channel methodology andor intervention strategy peer education usually involves training supporting member given group background experience value effect change among member group often used influence knowledge attitude belief behaviour individual level however peer educa tion may also create change group societal level modifying norm stimulating collective action contributes change policy programme worldwide peer education one widely used hivaids awareness strategy nn postexposure prophylaxispostexposure prevention pep shortterm antiretroviral treatment reduce likelihood hiv infection potential exposure infected body fluid needlestick injury result rape treatment administered qualified health care practitioner essentially consists taking high dos arvs 28 day effective treatment must start within 2 72 hour possible exposure earlier treatment started effective success rate varies nn routine optin testing approach testing whereby individual offered hiv test standard part treatmenthealth check heshe receive indivi dual informed heshe right decide whether undergo test nn sentinel surveillance surveillance based selected population sample chosen repre sent relevant experience particular group nn seroconversion period blood start producing detectable antibody response hiv infection nn seropositive hiv antibody hivpositive nn sexually transmitted infection sti disease commonly transmitted vaginal oral anal sex presence sti indicative risk behaviour also increase actual risk contracting hiv nn sti syndromic management costeffective approach allows health worker diag nose sexually transmitted infection basis patient history symptom without need laboratory analysis treatment normally includes use broadspectrum antibiotic nn universal precaution simple infection control measure reduce risk transmis sion blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person n use new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recom mended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equip ment available n discard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full n document quality sterilization medical equipment used percuta neous procedure n wash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid n disinfect instrument contaminated equipment n handle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little po sible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water nn voluntary hiv testing clientinitiated hiv test whereby individual chooses go testing facilityprovider find hisher hiv status nn window period time period initial infection hiv body pro duction antibody three month time hiv test antibody may negative even though person virus infect others", "ProcessedSent": "nn behaviourchange communication bcc participatory communitylevel process aimed developing positive behaviour promoting sustaining individual community societal behaviour change maintaining appropriate behaviour", "SentID": 10067 }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181236,14 +181236,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative.", + "Sentence": "\n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative.", "newParagraph": "term definition nn aid acquired immune deficiency syndrome stage hiv immune system depleted leaving body vulnerable one lifethreatening disease nn antiretrovirals arvs broad term main type treatment hiv aid arvs cure nn behaviourchange communication bcc participatory communitylevel process aimed developing positive behaviour promoting sustaining individual community societal behaviour change maintaining appropriate behaviour nn false negativepositive hiv test result wrong either giving negative result person hivpositive positive result person hivnegative nn hiv human immunodeficiency virus virus cause aid nn hiv confirmation test according whounaids recommendation positive hiv test result whether elisa enzymelinked immunabsorbent assay simplerapid test confirmed using second different test confirm accuracy two dif ferent rapid test laboratory facility available nn hiv counselling counselling generally offered hiv test order help individual understand risk behaviour cope hivpositive result stay hivnegative counselling service also link individual option treatment care support provides information stay healthy possible minimize risk transmission others test result shall confidential usually vol untary counselling testing service package ensures hiv test voluntary pre post test counselling offered informed consent obtained agreement medical test procedure clear explanation risk benefit hiv test performed using approved hiv test kit following testing protocol nn hivnegative result hiv test detect antibody blood either mean person infected virus time test heshe window period ie false negative see mean heshe immune virus nn hivpositive result positive hiv test result mean person hiv antibody hisher blood infected hiv mean heshe aid hiv test usually test presence antibody two main method hiv testing n hiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply n simplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa rapid test usually give result approximately 30 minute easy perform suitable combination three simplerapid test recommended facility elisa elisawestern blot testing available nn inconclusive indeterminate result small percentage hiv test result inconclu sive mean result neither positive negative may due number factor related hiv infection person early stage infection insufficient hiv antibody present give positive result happens test must repeated nn information education communication iec development communication strategy support material based formative research designed impact level knowledge influence behaviour among specific group nn mandatory testing testing screening required federal state local law compel individual submit hiv testing without informed consent within country conduct mandatory testing usually limited specific population cat egories health care provider member military prisoner people highrisk situation nn nutritional requirement aid patient usually need food intake 30 percent higher standard recommended level nn opportunistic infection oi infection occurs immune system weakened might cause disease serious person properly func tioning immune system nn peer education popular concept variously refers approach communication channel methodology andor intervention strategy peer education usually involves training supporting member given group background experience value effect change among member group often used influence knowledge attitude belief behaviour individual level however peer educa tion may also create change group societal level modifying norm stimulating collective action contributes change policy programme worldwide peer education one widely used hivaids awareness strategy nn postexposure prophylaxispostexposure prevention pep shortterm antiretroviral treatment reduce likelihood hiv infection potential exposure infected body fluid needlestick injury result rape treatment administered qualified health care practitioner essentially consists taking high dos arvs 28 day effective treatment must start within 2 72 hour possible exposure earlier treatment started effective success rate varies nn routine optin testing approach testing whereby individual offered hiv test standard part treatmenthealth check heshe receive indivi dual informed heshe right decide whether undergo test nn sentinel surveillance surveillance based selected population sample chosen repre sent relevant experience particular group nn seroconversion period blood start producing detectable antibody response hiv infection nn seropositive hiv antibody hivpositive nn sexually transmitted infection sti disease commonly transmitted vaginal oral anal sex presence sti indicative risk behaviour also increase actual risk contracting hiv nn sti syndromic management costeffective approach allows health worker diag nose sexually transmitted infection basis patient history symptom without need laboratory analysis treatment normally includes use broadspectrum antibiotic nn universal precaution simple infection control measure reduce risk transmis sion blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person n use new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recom mended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equip ment available n discard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full n document quality sterilization medical equipment used percuta neous procedure n wash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid n disinfect instrument contaminated equipment n handle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little po sible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water nn voluntary hiv testing clientinitiated hiv test whereby individual chooses go testing facilityprovider find hisher hiv status nn window period time period initial infection hiv body pro duction antibody three month time hiv test antibody may negative even though person virus infect others", "ProcessedSent": "nn false negativepositive hiv test result wrong either giving negative result person hivpositive positive result person hivnegative", "SentID": 10068 }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181254,14 +181254,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS.", + "Sentence": "\n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS.", "newParagraph": "term definition nn aid acquired immune deficiency syndrome stage hiv immune system depleted leaving body vulnerable one lifethreatening disease nn antiretrovirals arvs broad term main type treatment hiv aid arvs cure nn behaviourchange communication bcc participatory communitylevel process aimed developing positive behaviour promoting sustaining individual community societal behaviour change maintaining appropriate behaviour nn false negativepositive hiv test result wrong either giving negative result person hivpositive positive result person hivnegative nn hiv human immunodeficiency virus virus cause aid nn hiv confirmation test according whounaids recommendation positive hiv test result whether elisa enzymelinked immunabsorbent assay simplerapid test confirmed using second different test confirm accuracy two dif ferent rapid test laboratory facility available nn hiv counselling counselling generally offered hiv test order help individual understand risk behaviour cope hivpositive result stay hivnegative counselling service also link individual option treatment care support provides information stay healthy possible minimize risk transmission others test result shall confidential usually vol untary counselling testing service package ensures hiv test voluntary pre post test counselling offered informed consent obtained agreement medical test procedure clear explanation risk benefit hiv test performed using approved hiv test kit following testing protocol nn hivnegative result hiv test detect antibody blood either mean person infected virus time test heshe window period ie false negative see mean heshe immune virus nn hivpositive result positive hiv test result mean person hiv antibody hisher blood infected hiv mean heshe aid hiv test usually test presence antibody two main method hiv testing n hiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply n simplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa rapid test usually give result approximately 30 minute easy perform suitable combination three simplerapid test recommended facility elisa elisawestern blot testing available nn inconclusive indeterminate result small percentage hiv test result inconclu sive mean result neither positive negative may due number factor related hiv infection person early stage infection insufficient hiv antibody present give positive result happens test must repeated nn information education communication iec development communication strategy support material based formative research designed impact level knowledge influence behaviour among specific group nn mandatory testing testing screening required federal state local law compel individual submit hiv testing without informed consent within country conduct mandatory testing usually limited specific population cat egories health care provider member military prisoner people highrisk situation nn nutritional requirement aid patient usually need food intake 30 percent higher standard recommended level nn opportunistic infection oi infection occurs immune system weakened might cause disease serious person properly func tioning immune system nn peer education popular concept variously refers approach communication channel methodology andor intervention strategy peer education usually involves training supporting member given group background experience value effect change among member group often used influence knowledge attitude belief behaviour individual level however peer educa tion may also create change group societal level modifying norm stimulating collective action contributes change policy programme worldwide peer education one widely used hivaids awareness strategy nn postexposure prophylaxispostexposure prevention pep shortterm antiretroviral treatment reduce likelihood hiv infection potential exposure infected body fluid needlestick injury result rape treatment administered qualified health care practitioner essentially consists taking high dos arvs 28 day effective treatment must start within 2 72 hour possible exposure earlier treatment started effective success rate varies nn routine optin testing approach testing whereby individual offered hiv test standard part treatmenthealth check heshe receive indivi dual informed heshe right decide whether undergo test nn sentinel surveillance surveillance based selected population sample chosen repre sent relevant experience particular group nn seroconversion period blood start producing detectable antibody response hiv infection nn seropositive hiv antibody hivpositive nn sexually transmitted infection sti disease commonly transmitted vaginal oral anal sex presence sti indicative risk behaviour also increase actual risk contracting hiv nn sti syndromic management costeffective approach allows health worker diag nose sexually transmitted infection basis patient history symptom without need laboratory analysis treatment normally includes use broadspectrum antibiotic nn universal precaution simple infection control measure reduce risk transmis sion blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person n use new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recom mended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equip ment available n discard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full n document quality sterilization medical equipment used percuta neous procedure n wash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid n disinfect instrument contaminated equipment n handle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little po sible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water nn voluntary hiv testing clientinitiated hiv test whereby individual chooses go testing facilityprovider find hisher hiv status nn window period time period initial infection hiv body pro duction antibody three month time hiv test antibody may negative even though person virus infect others", "ProcessedSent": "nn hiv human immunodeficiency virus virus cause aid", "SentID": 10069 }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181272,14 +181272,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available.", + "Sentence": "\n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available.", "newParagraph": "term definition nn aid acquired immune deficiency syndrome stage hiv immune system depleted leaving body vulnerable one lifethreatening disease nn antiretrovirals arvs broad term main type treatment hiv aid arvs cure nn behaviourchange communication bcc participatory communitylevel process aimed developing positive behaviour promoting sustaining individual community societal behaviour change maintaining appropriate behaviour nn false negativepositive hiv test result wrong either giving negative result person hivpositive positive result person hivnegative nn hiv human immunodeficiency virus virus cause aid nn hiv confirmation test according whounaids recommendation positive hiv test result whether elisa enzymelinked immunabsorbent assay simplerapid test confirmed using second different test confirm accuracy two dif ferent rapid test laboratory facility available nn hiv counselling counselling generally offered hiv test order help individual understand risk behaviour cope hivpositive result stay hivnegative counselling service also link individual option treatment care support provides information stay healthy possible minimize risk transmission others test result shall confidential usually vol untary counselling testing service package ensures hiv test voluntary pre post test counselling offered informed consent obtained agreement medical test procedure clear explanation risk benefit hiv test performed using approved hiv test kit following testing protocol nn hivnegative result hiv test detect antibody blood either mean person infected virus time test heshe window period ie false negative see mean heshe immune virus nn hivpositive result positive hiv test result mean person hiv antibody hisher blood infected hiv mean heshe aid hiv test usually test presence antibody two main method hiv testing n hiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply n simplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa rapid test usually give result approximately 30 minute easy perform suitable combination three simplerapid test recommended facility elisa elisawestern blot testing available nn inconclusive indeterminate result small percentage hiv test result inconclu sive mean result neither positive negative may due number factor related hiv infection person early stage infection insufficient hiv antibody present give positive result happens test must repeated nn information education communication iec development communication strategy support material based formative research designed impact level knowledge influence behaviour among specific group nn mandatory testing testing screening required federal state local law compel individual submit hiv testing without informed consent within country conduct mandatory testing usually limited specific population cat egories health care provider member military prisoner people highrisk situation nn nutritional requirement aid patient usually need food intake 30 percent higher standard recommended level nn opportunistic infection oi infection occurs immune system weakened might cause disease serious person properly func tioning immune system nn peer education popular concept variously refers approach communication channel methodology andor intervention strategy peer education usually involves training supporting member given group background experience value effect change among member group often used influence knowledge attitude belief behaviour individual level however peer educa tion may also create change group societal level modifying norm stimulating collective action contributes change policy programme worldwide peer education one widely used hivaids awareness strategy nn postexposure prophylaxispostexposure prevention pep shortterm antiretroviral treatment reduce likelihood hiv infection potential exposure infected body fluid needlestick injury result rape treatment administered qualified health care practitioner essentially consists taking high dos arvs 28 day effective treatment must start within 2 72 hour possible exposure earlier treatment started effective success rate varies nn routine optin testing approach testing whereby individual offered hiv test standard part treatmenthealth check heshe receive indivi dual informed heshe right decide whether undergo test nn sentinel surveillance surveillance based selected population sample chosen repre sent relevant experience particular group nn seroconversion period blood start producing detectable antibody response hiv infection nn seropositive hiv antibody hivpositive nn sexually transmitted infection sti disease commonly transmitted vaginal oral anal sex presence sti indicative risk behaviour also increase actual risk contracting hiv nn sti syndromic management costeffective approach allows health worker diag nose sexually transmitted infection basis patient history symptom without need laboratory analysis treatment normally includes use broadspectrum antibiotic nn universal precaution simple infection control measure reduce risk transmis sion blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person n use new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recom mended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equip ment available n discard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full n document quality sterilization medical equipment used percuta neous procedure n wash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid n disinfect instrument contaminated equipment n handle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little po sible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water nn voluntary hiv testing clientinitiated hiv test whereby individual chooses go testing facilityprovider find hisher hiv status nn window period time period initial infection hiv body pro duction antibody three month time hiv test antibody may negative even though person virus infect others", "ProcessedSent": "nn hiv confirmation test according whounaids recommendation positive hiv test result whether elisa enzymelinked immunabsorbent assay simplerapid test confirmed using second different test confirm accuracy two dif ferent rapid test laboratory facility available", "SentID": 10070 }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181290,14 +181290,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative.", + "Sentence": "\n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative.", "newParagraph": "term definition nn aid acquired immune deficiency syndrome stage hiv immune system depleted leaving body vulnerable one lifethreatening disease nn antiretrovirals arvs broad term main type treatment hiv aid arvs cure nn behaviourchange communication bcc participatory communitylevel process aimed developing positive behaviour promoting sustaining individual community societal behaviour change maintaining appropriate behaviour nn false negativepositive hiv test result wrong either giving negative result person hivpositive positive result person hivnegative nn hiv human immunodeficiency virus virus cause aid nn hiv confirmation test according whounaids recommendation positive hiv test result whether elisa enzymelinked immunabsorbent assay simplerapid test confirmed using second different test confirm accuracy two dif ferent rapid test laboratory facility available nn hiv counselling counselling generally offered hiv test order help individual understand risk behaviour cope hivpositive result stay hivnegative counselling service also link individual option treatment care support provides information stay healthy possible minimize risk transmission others test result shall confidential usually vol untary counselling testing service package ensures hiv test voluntary pre post test counselling offered informed consent obtained agreement medical test procedure clear explanation risk benefit hiv test performed using approved hiv test kit following testing protocol nn hivnegative result hiv test detect antibody blood either mean person infected virus time test heshe window period ie false negative see mean heshe immune virus nn hivpositive result positive hiv test result mean person hiv antibody hisher blood infected hiv mean heshe aid hiv test usually test presence antibody two main method hiv testing n hiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply n simplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa rapid test usually give result approximately 30 minute easy perform suitable combination three simplerapid test recommended facility elisa elisawestern blot testing available nn inconclusive indeterminate result small percentage hiv test result inconclu sive mean result neither positive negative may due number factor related hiv infection person early stage infection insufficient hiv antibody present give positive result happens test must repeated nn information education communication iec development communication strategy support material based formative research designed impact level knowledge influence behaviour among specific group nn mandatory testing testing screening required federal state local law compel individual submit hiv testing without informed consent within country conduct mandatory testing usually limited specific population cat egories health care provider member military prisoner people highrisk situation nn nutritional requirement aid patient usually need food intake 30 percent higher standard recommended level nn opportunistic infection oi infection occurs immune system weakened might cause disease serious person properly func tioning immune system nn peer education popular concept variously refers approach communication channel methodology andor intervention strategy peer education usually involves training supporting member given group background experience value effect change among member group often used influence knowledge attitude belief behaviour individual level however peer educa tion may also create change group societal level modifying norm stimulating collective action contributes change policy programme worldwide peer education one widely used hivaids awareness strategy nn postexposure prophylaxispostexposure prevention pep shortterm antiretroviral treatment reduce likelihood hiv infection potential exposure infected body fluid needlestick injury result rape treatment administered qualified health care practitioner essentially consists taking high dos arvs 28 day effective treatment must start within 2 72 hour possible exposure earlier treatment started effective success rate varies nn routine optin testing approach testing whereby individual offered hiv test standard part treatmenthealth check heshe receive indivi dual informed heshe right decide whether undergo test nn sentinel surveillance surveillance based selected population sample chosen repre sent relevant experience particular group nn seroconversion period blood start producing detectable antibody response hiv infection nn seropositive hiv antibody hivpositive nn sexually transmitted infection sti disease commonly transmitted vaginal oral anal sex presence sti indicative risk behaviour also increase actual risk contracting hiv nn sti syndromic management costeffective approach allows health worker diag nose sexually transmitted infection basis patient history symptom without need laboratory analysis treatment normally includes use broadspectrum antibiotic nn universal precaution simple infection control measure reduce risk transmis sion blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person n use new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recom mended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equip ment available n discard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full n document quality sterilization medical equipment used percuta neous procedure n wash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid n disinfect instrument contaminated equipment n handle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little po sible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water nn voluntary hiv testing clientinitiated hiv test whereby individual chooses go testing facilityprovider find hisher hiv status nn window period time period initial infection hiv body pro duction antibody three month time hiv test antibody may negative even though person virus infect others", "ProcessedSent": "nn hiv counselling counselling generally offered hiv test order help individual understand risk behaviour cope hivpositive result stay hivnegative", "SentID": 10071 }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181315,7 +181315,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181333,7 +181333,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181351,7 +181351,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181362,14 +181362,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood.", + "Sentence": "\n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood.", "newParagraph": "term definition nn aid acquired immune deficiency syndrome stage hiv immune system depleted leaving body vulnerable one lifethreatening disease nn antiretrovirals arvs broad term main type treatment hiv aid arvs cure nn behaviourchange communication bcc participatory communitylevel process aimed developing positive behaviour promoting sustaining individual community societal behaviour change maintaining appropriate behaviour nn false negativepositive hiv test result wrong either giving negative result person hivpositive positive result person hivnegative nn hiv human immunodeficiency virus virus cause aid nn hiv confirmation test according whounaids recommendation positive hiv test result whether elisa enzymelinked immunabsorbent assay simplerapid test confirmed using second different test confirm accuracy two dif ferent rapid test laboratory facility available nn hiv counselling counselling generally offered hiv test order help individual understand risk behaviour cope hivpositive result stay hivnegative counselling service also link individual option treatment care support provides information stay healthy possible minimize risk transmission others test result shall confidential usually vol untary counselling testing service package ensures hiv test voluntary pre post test counselling offered informed consent obtained agreement medical test procedure clear explanation risk benefit hiv test performed using approved hiv test kit following testing protocol nn hivnegative result hiv test detect antibody blood either mean person infected virus time test heshe window period ie false negative see mean heshe immune virus nn hivpositive result positive hiv test result mean person hiv antibody hisher blood infected hiv mean heshe aid hiv test usually test presence antibody two main method hiv testing n hiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply n simplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa rapid test usually give result approximately 30 minute easy perform suitable combination three simplerapid test recommended facility elisa elisawestern blot testing available nn inconclusive indeterminate result small percentage hiv test result inconclu sive mean result neither positive negative may due number factor related hiv infection person early stage infection insufficient hiv antibody present give positive result happens test must repeated nn information education communication iec development communication strategy support material based formative research designed impact level knowledge influence behaviour among specific group nn mandatory testing testing screening required federal state local law compel individual submit hiv testing without informed consent within country conduct mandatory testing usually limited specific population cat egories health care provider member military prisoner people highrisk situation nn nutritional requirement aid patient usually need food intake 30 percent higher standard recommended level nn opportunistic infection oi infection occurs immune system weakened might cause disease serious person properly func tioning immune system nn peer education popular concept variously refers approach communication channel methodology andor intervention strategy peer education usually involves training supporting member given group background experience value effect change among member group often used influence knowledge attitude belief behaviour individual level however peer educa tion may also create change group societal level modifying norm stimulating collective action contributes change policy programme worldwide peer education one widely used hivaids awareness strategy nn postexposure prophylaxispostexposure prevention pep shortterm antiretroviral treatment reduce likelihood hiv infection potential exposure infected body fluid needlestick injury result rape treatment administered qualified health care practitioner essentially consists taking high dos arvs 28 day effective treatment must start within 2 72 hour possible exposure earlier treatment started effective success rate varies nn routine optin testing approach testing whereby individual offered hiv test standard part treatmenthealth check heshe receive indivi dual informed heshe right decide whether undergo test nn sentinel surveillance surveillance based selected population sample chosen repre sent relevant experience particular group nn seroconversion period blood start producing detectable antibody response hiv infection nn seropositive hiv antibody hivpositive nn sexually transmitted infection sti disease commonly transmitted vaginal oral anal sex presence sti indicative risk behaviour also increase actual risk contracting hiv nn sti syndromic management costeffective approach allows health worker diag nose sexually transmitted infection basis patient history symptom without need laboratory analysis treatment normally includes use broadspectrum antibiotic nn universal precaution simple infection control measure reduce risk transmis sion blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person n use new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recom mended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equip ment available n discard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full n document quality sterilization medical equipment used percuta neous procedure n wash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid n disinfect instrument contaminated equipment n handle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little po sible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water nn voluntary hiv testing clientinitiated hiv test whereby individual chooses go testing facilityprovider find hisher hiv status nn window period time period initial infection hiv body pro duction antibody three month time hiv test antibody may negative even though person virus infect others", "ProcessedSent": "nn hivnegative result hiv test detect antibody blood", "SentID": 10075 }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181387,7 +181387,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181405,7 +181405,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181416,14 +181416,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV.", + "Sentence": "\n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV.", "newParagraph": "term definition nn aid acquired immune deficiency syndrome stage hiv immune system depleted leaving body vulnerable one lifethreatening disease nn antiretrovirals arvs broad term main type treatment hiv aid arvs cure nn behaviourchange communication bcc participatory communitylevel process aimed developing positive behaviour promoting sustaining individual community societal behaviour change maintaining appropriate behaviour nn false negativepositive hiv test result wrong either giving negative result person hivpositive positive result person hivnegative nn hiv human immunodeficiency virus virus cause aid nn hiv confirmation test according whounaids recommendation positive hiv test result whether elisa enzymelinked immunabsorbent assay simplerapid test confirmed using second different test confirm accuracy two dif ferent rapid test laboratory facility available nn hiv counselling counselling generally offered hiv test order help individual understand risk behaviour cope hivpositive result stay hivnegative counselling service also link individual option treatment care support provides information stay healthy possible minimize risk transmission others test result shall confidential usually vol untary counselling testing service package ensures hiv test voluntary pre post test counselling offered informed consent obtained agreement medical test procedure clear explanation risk benefit hiv test performed using approved hiv test kit following testing protocol nn hivnegative result hiv test detect antibody blood either mean person infected virus time test heshe window period ie false negative see mean heshe immune virus nn hivpositive result positive hiv test result mean person hiv antibody hisher blood infected hiv mean heshe aid hiv test usually test presence antibody two main method hiv testing n hiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply n simplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa rapid test usually give result approximately 30 minute easy perform suitable combination three simplerapid test recommended facility elisa elisawestern blot testing available nn inconclusive indeterminate result small percentage hiv test result inconclu sive mean result neither positive negative may due number factor related hiv infection person early stage infection insufficient hiv antibody present give positive result happens test must repeated nn information education communication iec development communication strategy support material based formative research designed impact level knowledge influence behaviour among specific group nn mandatory testing testing screening required federal state local law compel individual submit hiv testing without informed consent within country conduct mandatory testing usually limited specific population cat egories health care provider member military prisoner people highrisk situation nn nutritional requirement aid patient usually need food intake 30 percent higher standard recommended level nn opportunistic infection oi infection occurs immune system weakened might cause disease serious person properly func tioning immune system nn peer education popular concept variously refers approach communication channel methodology andor intervention strategy peer education usually involves training supporting member given group background experience value effect change among member group often used influence knowledge attitude belief behaviour individual level however peer educa tion may also create change group societal level modifying norm stimulating collective action contributes change policy programme worldwide peer education one widely used hivaids awareness strategy nn postexposure prophylaxispostexposure prevention pep shortterm antiretroviral treatment reduce likelihood hiv infection potential exposure infected body fluid needlestick injury result rape treatment administered qualified health care practitioner essentially consists taking high dos arvs 28 day effective treatment must start within 2 72 hour possible exposure earlier treatment started effective success rate varies nn routine optin testing approach testing whereby individual offered hiv test standard part treatmenthealth check heshe receive indivi dual informed heshe right decide whether undergo test nn sentinel surveillance surveillance based selected population sample chosen repre sent relevant experience particular group nn seroconversion period blood start producing detectable antibody response hiv infection nn seropositive hiv antibody hivpositive nn sexually transmitted infection sti disease commonly transmitted vaginal oral anal sex presence sti indicative risk behaviour also increase actual risk contracting hiv nn sti syndromic management costeffective approach allows health worker diag nose sexually transmitted infection basis patient history symptom without need laboratory analysis treatment normally includes use broadspectrum antibiotic nn universal precaution simple infection control measure reduce risk transmis sion blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person n use new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recom mended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equip ment available n discard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full n document quality sterilization medical equipment used percuta neous procedure n wash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid n disinfect instrument contaminated equipment n handle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little po sible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water nn voluntary hiv testing clientinitiated hiv test whereby individual chooses go testing facilityprovider find hisher hiv status nn window period time period initial infection hiv body pro duction antibody three month time hiv test antibody may negative even though person virus infect others", "ProcessedSent": "nn hivpositive result positive hiv test result mean person hiv antibody hisher blood infected hiv", "SentID": 10078 }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181441,7 +181441,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181459,7 +181459,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181470,14 +181470,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA.", + "Sentence": "There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA.", "newParagraph": "term definition nn aid acquired immune deficiency syndrome stage hiv immune system depleted leaving body vulnerable one lifethreatening disease nn antiretrovirals arvs broad term main type treatment hiv aid arvs cure nn behaviourchange communication bcc participatory communitylevel process aimed developing positive behaviour promoting sustaining individual community societal behaviour change maintaining appropriate behaviour nn false negativepositive hiv test result wrong either giving negative result person hivpositive positive result person hivnegative nn hiv human immunodeficiency virus virus cause aid nn hiv confirmation test according whounaids recommendation positive hiv test result whether elisa enzymelinked immunabsorbent assay simplerapid test confirmed using second different test confirm accuracy two dif ferent rapid test laboratory facility available nn hiv counselling counselling generally offered hiv test order help individual understand risk behaviour cope hivpositive result stay hivnegative counselling service also link individual option treatment care support provides information stay healthy possible minimize risk transmission others test result shall confidential usually vol untary counselling testing service package ensures hiv test voluntary pre post test counselling offered informed consent obtained agreement medical test procedure clear explanation risk benefit hiv test performed using approved hiv test kit following testing protocol nn hivnegative result hiv test detect antibody blood either mean person infected virus time test heshe window period ie false negative see mean heshe immune virus nn hivpositive result positive hiv test result mean person hiv antibody hisher blood infected hiv mean heshe aid hiv test usually test presence antibody two main method hiv testing n hiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply n simplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa rapid test usually give result approximately 30 minute easy perform suitable combination three simplerapid test recommended facility elisa elisawestern blot testing available nn inconclusive indeterminate result small percentage hiv test result inconclu sive mean result neither positive negative may due number factor related hiv infection person early stage infection insufficient hiv antibody present give positive result happens test must repeated nn information education communication iec development communication strategy support material based formative research designed impact level knowledge influence behaviour among specific group nn mandatory testing testing screening required federal state local law compel individual submit hiv testing without informed consent within country conduct mandatory testing usually limited specific population cat egories health care provider member military prisoner people highrisk situation nn nutritional requirement aid patient usually need food intake 30 percent higher standard recommended level nn opportunistic infection oi infection occurs immune system weakened might cause disease serious person properly func tioning immune system nn peer education popular concept variously refers approach communication channel methodology andor intervention strategy peer education usually involves training supporting member given group background experience value effect change among member group often used influence knowledge attitude belief behaviour individual level however peer educa tion may also create change group societal level modifying norm stimulating collective action contributes change policy programme worldwide peer education one widely used hivaids awareness strategy nn postexposure prophylaxispostexposure prevention pep shortterm antiretroviral treatment reduce likelihood hiv infection potential exposure infected body fluid needlestick injury result rape treatment administered qualified health care practitioner essentially consists taking high dos arvs 28 day effective treatment must start within 2 72 hour possible exposure earlier treatment started effective success rate varies nn routine optin testing approach testing whereby individual offered hiv test standard part treatmenthealth check heshe receive indivi dual informed heshe right decide whether undergo test nn sentinel surveillance surveillance based selected population sample chosen repre sent relevant experience particular group nn seroconversion period blood start producing detectable antibody response hiv infection nn seropositive hiv antibody hivpositive nn sexually transmitted infection sti disease commonly transmitted vaginal oral anal sex presence sti indicative risk behaviour also increase actual risk contracting hiv nn sti syndromic management costeffective approach allows health worker diag nose sexually transmitted infection basis patient history symptom without need laboratory analysis treatment normally includes use broadspectrum antibiotic nn universal precaution simple infection control measure reduce risk transmis sion blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person n use new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recom mended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equip ment available n discard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full n document quality sterilization medical equipment used percuta neous procedure n wash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid n disinfect instrument contaminated equipment n handle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little po sible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water nn voluntary hiv testing clientinitiated hiv test whereby individual chooses go testing facilityprovider find hisher hiv status nn window period time period initial infection hiv body pro duction antibody three month time hiv test antibody may negative even though person virus infect others", "ProcessedSent": "two main method hiv testing n hiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply n simplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa", "SentID": 10081 }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181495,7 +181495,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181513,7 +181513,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181524,14 +181524,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive.", "newParagraph": "term definition nn aid acquired immune deficiency syndrome stage hiv immune system depleted leaving body vulnerable one lifethreatening disease nn antiretrovirals arvs broad term main type treatment hiv aid arvs cure nn behaviourchange communication bcc participatory communitylevel process aimed developing positive behaviour promoting sustaining individual community societal behaviour change maintaining appropriate behaviour nn false negativepositive hiv test result wrong either giving negative result person hivpositive positive result person hivnegative nn hiv human immunodeficiency virus virus cause aid nn hiv confirmation test according whounaids recommendation positive hiv test result whether elisa enzymelinked immunabsorbent assay simplerapid test confirmed using second different test confirm accuracy two dif ferent rapid test laboratory facility available nn hiv counselling counselling generally offered hiv test order help individual understand risk behaviour cope hivpositive result stay hivnegative counselling service also link individual option treatment care support provides information stay healthy possible minimize risk transmission others test result shall confidential usually vol untary counselling testing service package ensures hiv test voluntary pre post test counselling offered informed consent obtained agreement medical test procedure clear explanation risk benefit hiv test performed using approved hiv test kit following testing protocol nn hivnegative result hiv test detect antibody blood either mean person infected virus time test heshe window period ie false negative see mean heshe immune virus nn hivpositive result positive hiv test result mean person hiv antibody hisher blood infected hiv mean heshe aid hiv test usually test presence antibody two main method hiv testing n hiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply n simplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa rapid test usually give result approximately 30 minute easy perform suitable combination three simplerapid test recommended facility elisa elisawestern blot testing available nn inconclusive indeterminate result small percentage hiv test result inconclu sive mean result neither positive negative may due number factor related hiv infection person early stage infection insufficient hiv antibody present give positive result happens test must repeated nn information education communication iec development communication strategy support material based formative research designed impact level knowledge influence behaviour among specific group nn mandatory testing testing screening required federal state local law compel individual submit hiv testing without informed consent within country conduct mandatory testing usually limited specific population cat egories health care provider member military prisoner people highrisk situation nn nutritional requirement aid patient usually need food intake 30 percent higher standard recommended level nn opportunistic infection oi infection occurs immune system weakened might cause disease serious person properly func tioning immune system nn peer education popular concept variously refers approach communication channel methodology andor intervention strategy peer education usually involves training supporting member given group background experience value effect change among member group often used influence knowledge attitude belief behaviour individual level however peer educa tion may also create change group societal level modifying norm stimulating collective action contributes change policy programme worldwide peer education one widely used hivaids awareness strategy nn postexposure prophylaxispostexposure prevention pep shortterm antiretroviral treatment reduce likelihood hiv infection potential exposure infected body fluid needlestick injury result rape treatment administered qualified health care practitioner essentially consists taking high dos arvs 28 day effective treatment must start within 2 72 hour possible exposure earlier treatment started effective success rate varies nn routine optin testing approach testing whereby individual offered hiv test standard part treatmenthealth check heshe receive indivi dual informed heshe right decide whether undergo test nn sentinel surveillance surveillance based selected population sample chosen repre sent relevant experience particular group nn seroconversion period blood start producing detectable antibody response hiv infection nn seropositive hiv antibody hivpositive nn sexually transmitted infection sti disease commonly transmitted vaginal oral anal sex presence sti indicative risk behaviour also increase actual risk contracting hiv nn sti syndromic management costeffective approach allows health worker diag nose sexually transmitted infection basis patient history symptom without need laboratory analysis treatment normally includes use broadspectrum antibiotic nn universal precaution simple infection control measure reduce risk transmis sion blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person n use new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recom mended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equip ment available n discard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full n document quality sterilization medical equipment used percuta neous procedure n wash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid n disinfect instrument contaminated equipment n handle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little po sible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water nn voluntary hiv testing clientinitiated hiv test whereby individual chooses go testing facilityprovider find hisher hiv status nn window period time period initial infection hiv body pro duction antibody three month time hiv test antibody may negative even though person virus infect others", "ProcessedSent": "nn inconclusive indeterminate result small percentage hiv test result inconclu sive", "SentID": 10084 }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181549,7 +181549,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181567,7 +181567,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181585,7 +181585,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181596,14 +181596,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups.", "newParagraph": "term definition nn aid acquired immune deficiency syndrome stage hiv immune system depleted leaving body vulnerable one lifethreatening disease nn antiretrovirals arvs broad term main type treatment hiv aid arvs cure nn behaviourchange communication bcc participatory communitylevel process aimed developing positive behaviour promoting sustaining individual community societal behaviour change maintaining appropriate behaviour nn false negativepositive hiv test result wrong either giving negative result person hivpositive positive result person hivnegative nn hiv human immunodeficiency virus virus cause aid nn hiv confirmation test according whounaids recommendation positive hiv test result whether elisa enzymelinked immunabsorbent assay simplerapid test confirmed using second different test confirm accuracy two dif ferent rapid test laboratory facility available nn hiv counselling counselling generally offered hiv test order help individual understand risk behaviour cope hivpositive result stay hivnegative counselling service also link individual option treatment care support provides information stay healthy possible minimize risk transmission others test result shall confidential usually vol untary counselling testing service package ensures hiv test voluntary pre post test counselling offered informed consent obtained agreement medical test procedure clear explanation risk benefit hiv test performed using approved hiv test kit following testing protocol nn hivnegative result hiv test detect antibody blood either mean person infected virus time test heshe window period ie false negative see mean heshe immune virus nn hivpositive result positive hiv test result mean person hiv antibody hisher blood infected hiv mean heshe aid hiv test usually test presence antibody two main method hiv testing n hiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply n simplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa rapid test usually give result approximately 30 minute easy perform suitable combination three simplerapid test recommended facility elisa elisawestern blot testing available nn inconclusive indeterminate result small percentage hiv test result inconclu sive mean result neither positive negative may due number factor related hiv infection person early stage infection insufficient hiv antibody present give positive result happens test must repeated nn information education communication iec development communication strategy support material based formative research designed impact level knowledge influence behaviour among specific group nn mandatory testing testing screening required federal state local law compel individual submit hiv testing without informed consent within country conduct mandatory testing usually limited specific population cat egories health care provider member military prisoner people highrisk situation nn nutritional requirement aid patient usually need food intake 30 percent higher standard recommended level nn opportunistic infection oi infection occurs immune system weakened might cause disease serious person properly func tioning immune system nn peer education popular concept variously refers approach communication channel methodology andor intervention strategy peer education usually involves training supporting member given group background experience value effect change among member group often used influence knowledge attitude belief behaviour individual level however peer educa tion may also create change group societal level modifying norm stimulating collective action contributes change policy programme worldwide peer education one widely used hivaids awareness strategy nn postexposure prophylaxispostexposure prevention pep shortterm antiretroviral treatment reduce likelihood hiv infection potential exposure infected body fluid needlestick injury result rape treatment administered qualified health care practitioner essentially consists taking high dos arvs 28 day effective treatment must start within 2 72 hour possible exposure earlier treatment started effective success rate varies nn routine optin testing approach testing whereby individual offered hiv test standard part treatmenthealth check heshe receive indivi dual informed heshe right decide whether undergo test nn sentinel surveillance surveillance based selected population sample chosen repre sent relevant experience particular group nn seroconversion period blood start producing detectable antibody response hiv infection nn seropositive hiv antibody hivpositive nn sexually transmitted infection sti disease commonly transmitted vaginal oral anal sex presence sti indicative risk behaviour also increase actual risk contracting hiv nn sti syndromic management costeffective approach allows health worker diag nose sexually transmitted infection basis patient history symptom without need laboratory analysis treatment normally includes use broadspectrum antibiotic nn universal precaution simple infection control measure reduce risk transmis sion blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person n use new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recom mended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equip ment available n discard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full n document quality sterilization medical equipment used percuta neous procedure n wash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid n disinfect instrument contaminated equipment n handle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little po sible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water nn voluntary hiv testing clientinitiated hiv test whereby individual chooses go testing facilityprovider find hisher hiv status nn window period time period initial infection hiv body pro duction antibody three month time hiv test antibody may negative even though person virus infect others", "ProcessedSent": "nn information education communication iec development communication strategy support material based formative research designed impact level knowledge influence behaviour among specific group", "SentID": 10088 }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181614,14 +181614,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent.", "newParagraph": "term definition nn aid acquired immune deficiency syndrome stage hiv immune system depleted leaving body vulnerable one lifethreatening disease nn antiretrovirals arvs broad term main type treatment hiv aid arvs cure nn behaviourchange communication bcc participatory communitylevel process aimed developing positive behaviour promoting sustaining individual community societal behaviour change maintaining appropriate behaviour nn false negativepositive hiv test result wrong either giving negative result person hivpositive positive result person hivnegative nn hiv human immunodeficiency virus virus cause aid nn hiv confirmation test according whounaids recommendation positive hiv test result whether elisa enzymelinked immunabsorbent assay simplerapid test confirmed using second different test confirm accuracy two dif ferent rapid test laboratory facility available nn hiv counselling counselling generally offered hiv test order help individual understand risk behaviour cope hivpositive result stay hivnegative counselling service also link individual option treatment care support provides information stay healthy possible minimize risk transmission others test result shall confidential usually vol untary counselling testing service package ensures hiv test voluntary pre post test counselling offered informed consent obtained agreement medical test procedure clear explanation risk benefit hiv test performed using approved hiv test kit following testing protocol nn hivnegative result hiv test detect antibody blood either mean person infected virus time test heshe window period ie false negative see mean heshe immune virus nn hivpositive result positive hiv test result mean person hiv antibody hisher blood infected hiv mean heshe aid hiv test usually test presence antibody two main method hiv testing n hiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply n simplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa rapid test usually give result approximately 30 minute easy perform suitable combination three simplerapid test recommended facility elisa elisawestern blot testing available nn inconclusive indeterminate result small percentage hiv test result inconclu sive mean result neither positive negative may due number factor related hiv infection person early stage infection insufficient hiv antibody present give positive result happens test must repeated nn information education communication iec development communication strategy support material based formative research designed impact level knowledge influence behaviour among specific group nn mandatory testing testing screening required federal state local law compel individual submit hiv testing without informed consent within country conduct mandatory testing usually limited specific population cat egories health care provider member military prisoner people highrisk situation nn nutritional requirement aid patient usually need food intake 30 percent higher standard recommended level nn opportunistic infection oi infection occurs immune system weakened might cause disease serious person properly func tioning immune system nn peer education popular concept variously refers approach communication channel methodology andor intervention strategy peer education usually involves training supporting member given group background experience value effect change among member group often used influence knowledge attitude belief behaviour individual level however peer educa tion may also create change group societal level modifying norm stimulating collective action contributes change policy programme worldwide peer education one widely used hivaids awareness strategy nn postexposure prophylaxispostexposure prevention pep shortterm antiretroviral treatment reduce likelihood hiv infection potential exposure infected body fluid needlestick injury result rape treatment administered qualified health care practitioner essentially consists taking high dos arvs 28 day effective treatment must start within 2 72 hour possible exposure earlier treatment started effective success rate varies nn routine optin testing approach testing whereby individual offered hiv test standard part treatmenthealth check heshe receive indivi dual informed heshe right decide whether undergo test nn sentinel surveillance surveillance based selected population sample chosen repre sent relevant experience particular group nn seroconversion period blood start producing detectable antibody response hiv infection nn seropositive hiv antibody hivpositive nn sexually transmitted infection sti disease commonly transmitted vaginal oral anal sex presence sti indicative risk behaviour also increase actual risk contracting hiv nn sti syndromic management costeffective approach allows health worker diag nose sexually transmitted infection basis patient history symptom without need laboratory analysis treatment normally includes use broadspectrum antibiotic nn universal precaution simple infection control measure reduce risk transmis sion blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person n use new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recom mended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equip ment available n discard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full n document quality sterilization medical equipment used percuta neous procedure n wash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid n disinfect instrument contaminated equipment n handle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little po sible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water nn voluntary hiv testing clientinitiated hiv test whereby individual chooses go testing facilityprovider find hisher hiv status nn window period time period initial infection hiv body pro duction antibody three month time hiv test antibody may negative even though person virus infect others", "ProcessedSent": "nn mandatory testing testing screening required federal state local law compel individual submit hiv testing without informed consent", "SentID": 10089 }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181639,7 +181639,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181650,14 +181650,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels.", "newParagraph": "term definition nn aid acquired immune deficiency syndrome stage hiv immune system depleted leaving body vulnerable one lifethreatening disease nn antiretrovirals arvs broad term main type treatment hiv aid arvs cure nn behaviourchange communication bcc participatory communitylevel process aimed developing positive behaviour promoting sustaining individual community societal behaviour change maintaining appropriate behaviour nn false negativepositive hiv test result wrong either giving negative result person hivpositive positive result person hivnegative nn hiv human immunodeficiency virus virus cause aid nn hiv confirmation test according whounaids recommendation positive hiv test result whether elisa enzymelinked immunabsorbent assay simplerapid test confirmed using second different test confirm accuracy two dif ferent rapid test laboratory facility available nn hiv counselling counselling generally offered hiv test order help individual understand risk behaviour cope hivpositive result stay hivnegative counselling service also link individual option treatment care support provides information stay healthy possible minimize risk transmission others test result shall confidential usually vol untary counselling testing service package ensures hiv test voluntary pre post test counselling offered informed consent obtained agreement medical test procedure clear explanation risk benefit hiv test performed using approved hiv test kit following testing protocol nn hivnegative result hiv test detect antibody blood either mean person infected virus time test heshe window period ie false negative see mean heshe immune virus nn hivpositive result positive hiv test result mean person hiv antibody hisher blood infected hiv mean heshe aid hiv test usually test presence antibody two main method hiv testing n hiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply n simplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa rapid test usually give result approximately 30 minute easy perform suitable combination three simplerapid test recommended facility elisa elisawestern blot testing available nn inconclusive indeterminate result small percentage hiv test result inconclu sive mean result neither positive negative may due number factor related hiv infection person early stage infection insufficient hiv antibody present give positive result happens test must repeated nn information education communication iec development communication strategy support material based formative research designed impact level knowledge influence behaviour among specific group nn mandatory testing testing screening required federal state local law compel individual submit hiv testing without informed consent within country conduct mandatory testing usually limited specific population cat egories health care provider member military prisoner people highrisk situation nn nutritional requirement aid patient usually need food intake 30 percent higher standard recommended level nn opportunistic infection oi infection occurs immune system weakened might cause disease serious person properly func tioning immune system nn peer education popular concept variously refers approach communication channel methodology andor intervention strategy peer education usually involves training supporting member given group background experience value effect change among member group often used influence knowledge attitude belief behaviour individual level however peer educa tion may also create change group societal level modifying norm stimulating collective action contributes change policy programme worldwide peer education one widely used hivaids awareness strategy nn postexposure prophylaxispostexposure prevention pep shortterm antiretroviral treatment reduce likelihood hiv infection potential exposure infected body fluid needlestick injury result rape treatment administered qualified health care practitioner essentially consists taking high dos arvs 28 day effective treatment must start within 2 72 hour possible exposure earlier treatment started effective success rate varies nn routine optin testing approach testing whereby individual offered hiv test standard part treatmenthealth check heshe receive indivi dual informed heshe right decide whether undergo test nn sentinel surveillance surveillance based selected population sample chosen repre sent relevant experience particular group nn seroconversion period blood start producing detectable antibody response hiv infection nn seropositive hiv antibody hivpositive nn sexually transmitted infection sti disease commonly transmitted vaginal oral anal sex presence sti indicative risk behaviour also increase actual risk contracting hiv nn sti syndromic management costeffective approach allows health worker diag nose sexually transmitted infection basis patient history symptom without need laboratory analysis treatment normally includes use broadspectrum antibiotic nn universal precaution simple infection control measure reduce risk transmis sion blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person n use new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recom mended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equip ment available n discard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full n document quality sterilization medical equipment used percuta neous procedure n wash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid n disinfect instrument contaminated equipment n handle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little po sible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water nn voluntary hiv testing clientinitiated hiv test whereby individual chooses go testing facilityprovider find hisher hiv status nn window period time period initial infection hiv body pro duction antibody three month time hiv test antibody may negative even though person virus infect others", "ProcessedSent": "nn nutritional requirement aid patient usually need food intake 30 percent higher standard recommended level", "SentID": 10091 }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181668,14 +181668,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system.", "newParagraph": "term definition nn aid acquired immune deficiency syndrome stage hiv immune system depleted leaving body vulnerable one lifethreatening disease nn antiretrovirals arvs broad term main type treatment hiv aid arvs cure nn behaviourchange communication bcc participatory communitylevel process aimed developing positive behaviour promoting sustaining individual community societal behaviour change maintaining appropriate behaviour nn false negativepositive hiv test result wrong either giving negative result person hivpositive positive result person hivnegative nn hiv human immunodeficiency virus virus cause aid nn hiv confirmation test according whounaids recommendation positive hiv test result whether elisa enzymelinked immunabsorbent assay simplerapid test confirmed using second different test confirm accuracy two dif ferent rapid test laboratory facility available nn hiv counselling counselling generally offered hiv test order help individual understand risk behaviour cope hivpositive result stay hivnegative counselling service also link individual option treatment care support provides information stay healthy possible minimize risk transmission others test result shall confidential usually vol untary counselling testing service package ensures hiv test voluntary pre post test counselling offered informed consent obtained agreement medical test procedure clear explanation risk benefit hiv test performed using approved hiv test kit following testing protocol nn hivnegative result hiv test detect antibody blood either mean person infected virus time test heshe window period ie false negative see mean heshe immune virus nn hivpositive result positive hiv test result mean person hiv antibody hisher blood infected hiv mean heshe aid hiv test usually test presence antibody two main method hiv testing n hiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply n simplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa rapid test usually give result approximately 30 minute easy perform suitable combination three simplerapid test recommended facility elisa elisawestern blot testing available nn inconclusive indeterminate result small percentage hiv test result inconclu sive mean result neither positive negative may due number factor related hiv infection person early stage infection insufficient hiv antibody present give positive result happens test must repeated nn information education communication iec development communication strategy support material based formative research designed impact level knowledge influence behaviour among specific group nn mandatory testing testing screening required federal state local law compel individual submit hiv testing without informed consent within country conduct mandatory testing usually limited specific population cat egories health care provider member military prisoner people highrisk situation nn nutritional requirement aid patient usually need food intake 30 percent higher standard recommended level nn opportunistic infection oi infection occurs immune system weakened might cause disease serious person properly func tioning immune system nn peer education popular concept variously refers approach communication channel methodology andor intervention strategy peer education usually involves training supporting member given group background experience value effect change among member group often used influence knowledge attitude belief behaviour individual level however peer educa tion may also create change group societal level modifying norm stimulating collective action contributes change policy programme worldwide peer education one widely used hivaids awareness strategy nn postexposure prophylaxispostexposure prevention pep shortterm antiretroviral treatment reduce likelihood hiv infection potential exposure infected body fluid needlestick injury result rape treatment administered qualified health care practitioner essentially consists taking high dos arvs 28 day effective treatment must start within 2 72 hour possible exposure earlier treatment started effective success rate varies nn routine optin testing approach testing whereby individual offered hiv test standard part treatmenthealth check heshe receive indivi dual informed heshe right decide whether undergo test nn sentinel surveillance surveillance based selected population sample chosen repre sent relevant experience particular group nn seroconversion period blood start producing detectable antibody response hiv infection nn seropositive hiv antibody hivpositive nn sexually transmitted infection sti disease commonly transmitted vaginal oral anal sex presence sti indicative risk behaviour also increase actual risk contracting hiv nn sti syndromic management costeffective approach allows health worker diag nose sexually transmitted infection basis patient history symptom without need laboratory analysis treatment normally includes use broadspectrum antibiotic nn universal precaution simple infection control measure reduce risk transmis sion blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person n use new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recom mended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equip ment available n discard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full n document quality sterilization medical equipment used percuta neous procedure n wash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid n disinfect instrument contaminated equipment n handle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little po sible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water nn voluntary hiv testing clientinitiated hiv test whereby individual chooses go testing facilityprovider find hisher hiv status nn window period time period initial infection hiv body pro duction antibody three month time hiv test antibody may negative even though person virus infect others", "ProcessedSent": "nn opportunistic infection oi infection occurs immune system weakened might cause disease serious person properly func tioning immune system", "SentID": 10092 }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181686,14 +181686,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy.", "newParagraph": "term definition nn aid acquired immune deficiency syndrome stage hiv immune system depleted leaving body vulnerable one lifethreatening disease nn antiretrovirals arvs broad term main type treatment hiv aid arvs cure nn behaviourchange communication bcc participatory communitylevel process aimed developing positive behaviour promoting sustaining individual community societal behaviour change maintaining appropriate behaviour nn false negativepositive hiv test result wrong either giving negative result person hivpositive positive result person hivnegative nn hiv human immunodeficiency virus virus cause aid nn hiv confirmation test according whounaids recommendation positive hiv test result whether elisa enzymelinked immunabsorbent assay simplerapid test confirmed using second different test confirm accuracy two dif ferent rapid test laboratory facility available nn hiv counselling counselling generally offered hiv test order help individual understand risk behaviour cope hivpositive result stay hivnegative counselling service also link individual option treatment care support provides information stay healthy possible minimize risk transmission others test result shall confidential usually vol untary counselling testing service package ensures hiv test voluntary pre post test counselling offered informed consent obtained agreement medical test procedure clear explanation risk benefit hiv test performed using approved hiv test kit following testing protocol nn hivnegative result hiv test detect antibody blood either mean person infected virus time test heshe window period ie false negative see mean heshe immune virus nn hivpositive result positive hiv test result mean person hiv antibody hisher blood infected hiv mean heshe aid hiv test usually test presence antibody two main method hiv testing n hiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply n simplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa rapid test usually give result approximately 30 minute easy perform suitable combination three simplerapid test recommended facility elisa elisawestern blot testing available nn inconclusive indeterminate result small percentage hiv test result inconclu sive mean result neither positive negative may due number factor related hiv infection person early stage infection insufficient hiv antibody present give positive result happens test must repeated nn information education communication iec development communication strategy support material based formative research designed impact level knowledge influence behaviour among specific group nn mandatory testing testing screening required federal state local law compel individual submit hiv testing without informed consent within country conduct mandatory testing usually limited specific population cat egories health care provider member military prisoner people highrisk situation nn nutritional requirement aid patient usually need food intake 30 percent higher standard recommended level nn opportunistic infection oi infection occurs immune system weakened might cause disease serious person properly func tioning immune system nn peer education popular concept variously refers approach communication channel methodology andor intervention strategy peer education usually involves training supporting member given group background experience value effect change among member group often used influence knowledge attitude belief behaviour individual level however peer educa tion may also create change group societal level modifying norm stimulating collective action contributes change policy programme worldwide peer education one widely used hivaids awareness strategy nn postexposure prophylaxispostexposure prevention pep shortterm antiretroviral treatment reduce likelihood hiv infection potential exposure infected body fluid needlestick injury result rape treatment administered qualified health care practitioner essentially consists taking high dos arvs 28 day effective treatment must start within 2 72 hour possible exposure earlier treatment started effective success rate varies nn routine optin testing approach testing whereby individual offered hiv test standard part treatmenthealth check heshe receive indivi dual informed heshe right decide whether undergo test nn sentinel surveillance surveillance based selected population sample chosen repre sent relevant experience particular group nn seroconversion period blood start producing detectable antibody response hiv infection nn seropositive hiv antibody hivpositive nn sexually transmitted infection sti disease commonly transmitted vaginal oral anal sex presence sti indicative risk behaviour also increase actual risk contracting hiv nn sti syndromic management costeffective approach allows health worker diag nose sexually transmitted infection basis patient history symptom without need laboratory analysis treatment normally includes use broadspectrum antibiotic nn universal precaution simple infection control measure reduce risk transmis sion blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person n use new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recom mended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equip ment available n discard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full n document quality sterilization medical equipment used percuta neous procedure n wash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid n disinfect instrument contaminated equipment n handle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little po sible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water nn voluntary hiv testing clientinitiated hiv test whereby individual chooses go testing facilityprovider find hisher hiv status nn window period time period initial infection hiv body pro duction antibody three month time hiv test antibody may negative even though person virus infect others", "ProcessedSent": "nn peer education popular concept variously refers approach communication channel methodology andor intervention strategy", "SentID": 10093 }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181711,7 +181711,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181729,7 +181729,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181747,7 +181747,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181765,7 +181765,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181776,14 +181776,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape.", "newParagraph": "term definition nn aid acquired immune deficiency syndrome stage hiv immune system depleted leaving body vulnerable one lifethreatening disease nn antiretrovirals arvs broad term main type treatment hiv aid arvs cure nn behaviourchange communication bcc participatory communitylevel process aimed developing positive behaviour promoting sustaining individual community societal behaviour change maintaining appropriate behaviour nn false negativepositive hiv test result wrong either giving negative result person hivpositive positive result person hivnegative nn hiv human immunodeficiency virus virus cause aid nn hiv confirmation test according whounaids recommendation positive hiv test result whether elisa enzymelinked immunabsorbent assay simplerapid test confirmed using second different test confirm accuracy two dif ferent rapid test laboratory facility available nn hiv counselling counselling generally offered hiv test order help individual understand risk behaviour cope hivpositive result stay hivnegative counselling service also link individual option treatment care support provides information stay healthy possible minimize risk transmission others test result shall confidential usually vol untary counselling testing service package ensures hiv test voluntary pre post test counselling offered informed consent obtained agreement medical test procedure clear explanation risk benefit hiv test performed using approved hiv test kit following testing protocol nn hivnegative result hiv test detect antibody blood either mean person infected virus time test heshe window period ie false negative see mean heshe immune virus nn hivpositive result positive hiv test result mean person hiv antibody hisher blood infected hiv mean heshe aid hiv test usually test presence antibody two main method hiv testing n hiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply n simplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa rapid test usually give result approximately 30 minute easy perform suitable combination three simplerapid test recommended facility elisa elisawestern blot testing available nn inconclusive indeterminate result small percentage hiv test result inconclu sive mean result neither positive negative may due number factor related hiv infection person early stage infection insufficient hiv antibody present give positive result happens test must repeated nn information education communication iec development communication strategy support material based formative research designed impact level knowledge influence behaviour among specific group nn mandatory testing testing screening required federal state local law compel individual submit hiv testing without informed consent within country conduct mandatory testing usually limited specific population cat egories health care provider member military prisoner people highrisk situation nn nutritional requirement aid patient usually need food intake 30 percent higher standard recommended level nn opportunistic infection oi infection occurs immune system weakened might cause disease serious person properly func tioning immune system nn peer education popular concept variously refers approach communication channel methodology andor intervention strategy peer education usually involves training supporting member given group background experience value effect change among member group often used influence knowledge attitude belief behaviour individual level however peer educa tion may also create change group societal level modifying norm stimulating collective action contributes change policy programme worldwide peer education one widely used hivaids awareness strategy nn postexposure prophylaxispostexposure prevention pep shortterm antiretroviral treatment reduce likelihood hiv infection potential exposure infected body fluid needlestick injury result rape treatment administered qualified health care practitioner essentially consists taking high dos arvs 28 day effective treatment must start within 2 72 hour possible exposure earlier treatment started effective success rate varies nn routine optin testing approach testing whereby individual offered hiv test standard part treatmenthealth check heshe receive indivi dual informed heshe right decide whether undergo test nn sentinel surveillance surveillance based selected population sample chosen repre sent relevant experience particular group nn seroconversion period blood start producing detectable antibody response hiv infection nn seropositive hiv antibody hivpositive nn sexually transmitted infection sti disease commonly transmitted vaginal oral anal sex presence sti indicative risk behaviour also increase actual risk contracting hiv nn sti syndromic management costeffective approach allows health worker diag nose sexually transmitted infection basis patient history symptom without need laboratory analysis treatment normally includes use broadspectrum antibiotic nn universal precaution simple infection control measure reduce risk transmis sion blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person n use new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recom mended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equip ment available n discard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full n document quality sterilization medical equipment used percuta neous procedure n wash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid n disinfect instrument contaminated equipment n handle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little po sible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water nn voluntary hiv testing clientinitiated hiv test whereby individual chooses go testing facilityprovider find hisher hiv status nn window period time period initial infection hiv body pro duction antibody three month time hiv test antibody may negative even though person virus infect others", "ProcessedSent": "nn postexposure prophylaxispostexposure prevention pep shortterm antiretroviral treatment reduce likelihood hiv infection potential exposure infected body fluid needlestick injury result rape", "SentID": 10098 }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181801,7 +181801,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181819,7 +181819,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181837,7 +181837,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181855,7 +181855,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181866,14 +181866,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive.", "newParagraph": "term definition nn aid acquired immune deficiency syndrome stage hiv immune system depleted leaving body vulnerable one lifethreatening disease nn antiretrovirals arvs broad term main type treatment hiv aid arvs cure nn behaviourchange communication bcc participatory communitylevel process aimed developing positive behaviour promoting sustaining individual community societal behaviour change maintaining appropriate behaviour nn false negativepositive hiv test result wrong either giving negative result person hivpositive positive result person hivnegative nn hiv human immunodeficiency virus virus cause aid nn hiv confirmation test according whounaids recommendation positive hiv test result whether elisa enzymelinked immunabsorbent assay simplerapid test confirmed using second different test confirm accuracy two dif ferent rapid test laboratory facility available nn hiv counselling counselling generally offered hiv test order help individual understand risk behaviour cope hivpositive result stay hivnegative counselling service also link individual option treatment care support provides information stay healthy possible minimize risk transmission others test result shall confidential usually vol untary counselling testing service package ensures hiv test voluntary pre post test counselling offered informed consent obtained agreement medical test procedure clear explanation risk benefit hiv test performed using approved hiv test kit following testing protocol nn hivnegative result hiv test detect antibody blood either mean person infected virus time test heshe window period ie false negative see mean heshe immune virus nn hivpositive result positive hiv test result mean person hiv antibody hisher blood infected hiv mean heshe aid hiv test usually test presence antibody two main method hiv testing n hiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply n simplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa rapid test usually give result approximately 30 minute easy perform suitable combination three simplerapid test recommended facility elisa elisawestern blot testing available nn inconclusive indeterminate result small percentage hiv test result inconclu sive mean result neither positive negative may due number factor related hiv infection person early stage infection insufficient hiv antibody present give positive result happens test must repeated nn information education communication iec development communication strategy support material based formative research designed impact level knowledge influence behaviour among specific group nn mandatory testing testing screening required federal state local law compel individual submit hiv testing without informed consent within country conduct mandatory testing usually limited specific population cat egories health care provider member military prisoner people highrisk situation nn nutritional requirement aid patient usually need food intake 30 percent higher standard recommended level nn opportunistic infection oi infection occurs immune system weakened might cause disease serious person properly func tioning immune system nn peer education popular concept variously refers approach communication channel methodology andor intervention strategy peer education usually involves training supporting member given group background experience value effect change among member group often used influence knowledge attitude belief behaviour individual level however peer educa tion may also create change group societal level modifying norm stimulating collective action contributes change policy programme worldwide peer education one widely used hivaids awareness strategy nn postexposure prophylaxispostexposure prevention pep shortterm antiretroviral treatment reduce likelihood hiv infection potential exposure infected body fluid needlestick injury result rape treatment administered qualified health care practitioner essentially consists taking high dos arvs 28 day effective treatment must start within 2 72 hour possible exposure earlier treatment started effective success rate varies nn routine optin testing approach testing whereby individual offered hiv test standard part treatmenthealth check heshe receive indivi dual informed heshe right decide whether undergo test nn sentinel surveillance surveillance based selected population sample chosen repre sent relevant experience particular group nn seroconversion period blood start producing detectable antibody response hiv infection nn seropositive hiv antibody hivpositive nn sexually transmitted infection sti disease commonly transmitted vaginal oral anal sex presence sti indicative risk behaviour also increase actual risk contracting hiv nn sti syndromic management costeffective approach allows health worker diag nose sexually transmitted infection basis patient history symptom without need laboratory analysis treatment normally includes use broadspectrum antibiotic nn universal precaution simple infection control measure reduce risk transmis sion blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person n use new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recom mended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equip ment available n discard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full n document quality sterilization medical equipment used percuta neous procedure n wash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid n disinfect instrument contaminated equipment n handle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little po sible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water nn voluntary hiv testing clientinitiated hiv test whereby individual chooses go testing facilityprovider find hisher hiv status nn window period time period initial infection hiv body pro duction antibody three month time hiv test antibody may negative even though person virus infect others", "ProcessedSent": "nn routine optin testing approach testing whereby individual offered hiv test standard part treatmenthealth check heshe receive", "SentID": 10103 }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181891,7 +181891,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181902,14 +181902,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups.", "newParagraph": "term definition nn aid acquired immune deficiency syndrome stage hiv immune system depleted leaving body vulnerable one lifethreatening disease nn antiretrovirals arvs broad term main type treatment hiv aid arvs cure nn behaviourchange communication bcc participatory communitylevel process aimed developing positive behaviour promoting sustaining individual community societal behaviour change maintaining appropriate behaviour nn false negativepositive hiv test result wrong either giving negative result person hivpositive positive result person hivnegative nn hiv human immunodeficiency virus virus cause aid nn hiv confirmation test according whounaids recommendation positive hiv test result whether elisa enzymelinked immunabsorbent assay simplerapid test confirmed using second different test confirm accuracy two dif ferent rapid test laboratory facility available nn hiv counselling counselling generally offered hiv test order help individual understand risk behaviour cope hivpositive result stay hivnegative counselling service also link individual option treatment care support provides information stay healthy possible minimize risk transmission others test result shall confidential usually vol untary counselling testing service package ensures hiv test voluntary pre post test counselling offered informed consent obtained agreement medical test procedure clear explanation risk benefit hiv test performed using approved hiv test kit following testing protocol nn hivnegative result hiv test detect antibody blood either mean person infected virus time test heshe window period ie false negative see mean heshe immune virus nn hivpositive result positive hiv test result mean person hiv antibody hisher blood infected hiv mean heshe aid hiv test usually test presence antibody two main method hiv testing n hiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply n simplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa rapid test usually give result approximately 30 minute easy perform suitable combination three simplerapid test recommended facility elisa elisawestern blot testing available nn inconclusive indeterminate result small percentage hiv test result inconclu sive mean result neither positive negative may due number factor related hiv infection person early stage infection insufficient hiv antibody present give positive result happens test must repeated nn information education communication iec development communication strategy support material based formative research designed impact level knowledge influence behaviour among specific group nn mandatory testing testing screening required federal state local law compel individual submit hiv testing without informed consent within country conduct mandatory testing usually limited specific population cat egories health care provider member military prisoner people highrisk situation nn nutritional requirement aid patient usually need food intake 30 percent higher standard recommended level nn opportunistic infection oi infection occurs immune system weakened might cause disease serious person properly func tioning immune system nn peer education popular concept variously refers approach communication channel methodology andor intervention strategy peer education usually involves training supporting member given group background experience value effect change among member group often used influence knowledge attitude belief behaviour individual level however peer educa tion may also create change group societal level modifying norm stimulating collective action contributes change policy programme worldwide peer education one widely used hivaids awareness strategy nn postexposure prophylaxispostexposure prevention pep shortterm antiretroviral treatment reduce likelihood hiv infection potential exposure infected body fluid needlestick injury result rape treatment administered qualified health care practitioner essentially consists taking high dos arvs 28 day effective treatment must start within 2 72 hour possible exposure earlier treatment started effective success rate varies nn routine optin testing approach testing whereby individual offered hiv test standard part treatmenthealth check heshe receive indivi dual informed heshe right decide whether undergo test nn sentinel surveillance surveillance based selected population sample chosen repre sent relevant experience particular group nn seroconversion period blood start producing detectable antibody response hiv infection nn seropositive hiv antibody hivpositive nn sexually transmitted infection sti disease commonly transmitted vaginal oral anal sex presence sti indicative risk behaviour also increase actual risk contracting hiv nn sti syndromic management costeffective approach allows health worker diag nose sexually transmitted infection basis patient history symptom without need laboratory analysis treatment normally includes use broadspectrum antibiotic nn universal precaution simple infection control measure reduce risk transmis sion blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person n use new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recom mended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equip ment available n discard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full n document quality sterilization medical equipment used percuta neous procedure n wash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid n disinfect instrument contaminated equipment n handle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little po sible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water nn voluntary hiv testing clientinitiated hiv test whereby individual chooses go testing facilityprovider find hisher hiv status nn window period time period initial infection hiv body pro duction antibody three month time hiv test antibody may negative even though person virus infect others", "ProcessedSent": "nn sentinel surveillance surveillance based selected population sample chosen repre sent relevant experience particular group", "SentID": 10105 }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181920,14 +181920,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection.", "newParagraph": "term definition nn aid acquired immune deficiency syndrome stage hiv immune system depleted leaving body vulnerable one lifethreatening disease nn antiretrovirals arvs broad term main type treatment hiv aid arvs cure nn behaviourchange communication bcc participatory communitylevel process aimed developing positive behaviour promoting sustaining individual community societal behaviour change maintaining appropriate behaviour nn false negativepositive hiv test result wrong either giving negative result person hivpositive positive result person hivnegative nn hiv human immunodeficiency virus virus cause aid nn hiv confirmation test according whounaids recommendation positive hiv test result whether elisa enzymelinked immunabsorbent assay simplerapid test confirmed using second different test confirm accuracy two dif ferent rapid test laboratory facility available nn hiv counselling counselling generally offered hiv test order help individual understand risk behaviour cope hivpositive result stay hivnegative counselling service also link individual option treatment care support provides information stay healthy possible minimize risk transmission others test result shall confidential usually vol untary counselling testing service package ensures hiv test voluntary pre post test counselling offered informed consent obtained agreement medical test procedure clear explanation risk benefit hiv test performed using approved hiv test kit following testing protocol nn hivnegative result hiv test detect antibody blood either mean person infected virus time test heshe window period ie false negative see mean heshe immune virus nn hivpositive result positive hiv test result mean person hiv antibody hisher blood infected hiv mean heshe aid hiv test usually test presence antibody two main method hiv testing n hiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply n simplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa rapid test usually give result approximately 30 minute easy perform suitable combination three simplerapid test recommended facility elisa elisawestern blot testing available nn inconclusive indeterminate result small percentage hiv test result inconclu sive mean result neither positive negative may due number factor related hiv infection person early stage infection insufficient hiv antibody present give positive result happens test must repeated nn information education communication iec development communication strategy support material based formative research designed impact level knowledge influence behaviour among specific group nn mandatory testing testing screening required federal state local law compel individual submit hiv testing without informed consent within country conduct mandatory testing usually limited specific population cat egories health care provider member military prisoner people highrisk situation nn nutritional requirement aid patient usually need food intake 30 percent higher standard recommended level nn opportunistic infection oi infection occurs immune system weakened might cause disease serious person properly func tioning immune system nn peer education popular concept variously refers approach communication channel methodology andor intervention strategy peer education usually involves training supporting member given group background experience value effect change among member group often used influence knowledge attitude belief behaviour individual level however peer educa tion may also create change group societal level modifying norm stimulating collective action contributes change policy programme worldwide peer education one widely used hivaids awareness strategy nn postexposure prophylaxispostexposure prevention pep shortterm antiretroviral treatment reduce likelihood hiv infection potential exposure infected body fluid needlestick injury result rape treatment administered qualified health care practitioner essentially consists taking high dos arvs 28 day effective treatment must start within 2 72 hour possible exposure earlier treatment started effective success rate varies nn routine optin testing approach testing whereby individual offered hiv test standard part treatmenthealth check heshe receive indivi dual informed heshe right decide whether undergo test nn sentinel surveillance surveillance based selected population sample chosen repre sent relevant experience particular group nn seroconversion period blood start producing detectable antibody response hiv infection nn seropositive hiv antibody hivpositive nn sexually transmitted infection sti disease commonly transmitted vaginal oral anal sex presence sti indicative risk behaviour also increase actual risk contracting hiv nn sti syndromic management costeffective approach allows health worker diag nose sexually transmitted infection basis patient history symptom without need laboratory analysis treatment normally includes use broadspectrum antibiotic nn universal precaution simple infection control measure reduce risk transmis sion blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person n use new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recom mended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equip ment available n discard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full n document quality sterilization medical equipment used percuta neous procedure n wash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid n disinfect instrument contaminated equipment n handle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little po sible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water nn voluntary hiv testing clientinitiated hiv test whereby individual chooses go testing facilityprovider find hisher hiv status nn window period time period initial infection hiv body pro duction antibody three month time hiv test antibody may negative even though person virus infect others", "ProcessedSent": "nn seroconversion period blood start producing detectable antibody response hiv infection", "SentID": 10106 }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181938,14 +181938,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive.", "newParagraph": "term definition nn aid acquired immune deficiency syndrome stage hiv immune system depleted leaving body vulnerable one lifethreatening disease nn antiretrovirals arvs broad term main type treatment hiv aid arvs cure nn behaviourchange communication bcc participatory communitylevel process aimed developing positive behaviour promoting sustaining individual community societal behaviour change maintaining appropriate behaviour nn false negativepositive hiv test result wrong either giving negative result person hivpositive positive result person hivnegative nn hiv human immunodeficiency virus virus cause aid nn hiv confirmation test according whounaids recommendation positive hiv test result whether elisa enzymelinked immunabsorbent assay simplerapid test confirmed using second different test confirm accuracy two dif ferent rapid test laboratory facility available nn hiv counselling counselling generally offered hiv test order help individual understand risk behaviour cope hivpositive result stay hivnegative counselling service also link individual option treatment care support provides information stay healthy possible minimize risk transmission others test result shall confidential usually vol untary counselling testing service package ensures hiv test voluntary pre post test counselling offered informed consent obtained agreement medical test procedure clear explanation risk benefit hiv test performed using approved hiv test kit following testing protocol nn hivnegative result hiv test detect antibody blood either mean person infected virus time test heshe window period ie false negative see mean heshe immune virus nn hivpositive result positive hiv test result mean person hiv antibody hisher blood infected hiv mean heshe aid hiv test usually test presence antibody two main method hiv testing n hiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply n simplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa rapid test usually give result approximately 30 minute easy perform suitable combination three simplerapid test recommended facility elisa elisawestern blot testing available nn inconclusive indeterminate result small percentage hiv test result inconclu sive mean result neither positive negative may due number factor related hiv infection person early stage infection insufficient hiv antibody present give positive result happens test must repeated nn information education communication iec development communication strategy support material based formative research designed impact level knowledge influence behaviour among specific group nn mandatory testing testing screening required federal state local law compel individual submit hiv testing without informed consent within country conduct mandatory testing usually limited specific population cat egories health care provider member military prisoner people highrisk situation nn nutritional requirement aid patient usually need food intake 30 percent higher standard recommended level nn opportunistic infection oi infection occurs immune system weakened might cause disease serious person properly func tioning immune system nn peer education popular concept variously refers approach communication channel methodology andor intervention strategy peer education usually involves training supporting member given group background experience value effect change among member group often used influence knowledge attitude belief behaviour individual level however peer educa tion may also create change group societal level modifying norm stimulating collective action contributes change policy programme worldwide peer education one widely used hivaids awareness strategy nn postexposure prophylaxispostexposure prevention pep shortterm antiretroviral treatment reduce likelihood hiv infection potential exposure infected body fluid needlestick injury result rape treatment administered qualified health care practitioner essentially consists taking high dos arvs 28 day effective treatment must start within 2 72 hour possible exposure earlier treatment started effective success rate varies nn routine optin testing approach testing whereby individual offered hiv test standard part treatmenthealth check heshe receive indivi dual informed heshe right decide whether undergo test nn sentinel surveillance surveillance based selected population sample chosen repre sent relevant experience particular group nn seroconversion period blood start producing detectable antibody response hiv infection nn seropositive hiv antibody hivpositive nn sexually transmitted infection sti disease commonly transmitted vaginal oral anal sex presence sti indicative risk behaviour also increase actual risk contracting hiv nn sti syndromic management costeffective approach allows health worker diag nose sexually transmitted infection basis patient history symptom without need laboratory analysis treatment normally includes use broadspectrum antibiotic nn universal precaution simple infection control measure reduce risk transmis sion blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person n use new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recom mended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equip ment available n discard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full n document quality sterilization medical equipment used percuta neous procedure n wash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid n disinfect instrument contaminated equipment n handle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little po sible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water nn voluntary hiv testing clientinitiated hiv test whereby individual chooses go testing facilityprovider find hisher hiv status nn window period time period initial infection hiv body pro duction antibody three month time hiv test antibody may negative even though person virus infect others", "ProcessedSent": "nn seropositive hiv antibody hivpositive", "SentID": 10107 }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181956,14 +181956,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex.", "newParagraph": "term definition nn aid acquired immune deficiency syndrome stage hiv immune system depleted leaving body vulnerable one lifethreatening disease nn antiretrovirals arvs broad term main type treatment hiv aid arvs cure nn behaviourchange communication bcc participatory communitylevel process aimed developing positive behaviour promoting sustaining individual community societal behaviour change maintaining appropriate behaviour nn false negativepositive hiv test result wrong either giving negative result person hivpositive positive result person hivnegative nn hiv human immunodeficiency virus virus cause aid nn hiv confirmation test according whounaids recommendation positive hiv test result whether elisa enzymelinked immunabsorbent assay simplerapid test confirmed using second different test confirm accuracy two dif ferent rapid test laboratory facility available nn hiv counselling counselling generally offered hiv test order help individual understand risk behaviour cope hivpositive result stay hivnegative counselling service also link individual option treatment care support provides information stay healthy possible minimize risk transmission others test result shall confidential usually vol untary counselling testing service package ensures hiv test voluntary pre post test counselling offered informed consent obtained agreement medical test procedure clear explanation risk benefit hiv test performed using approved hiv test kit following testing protocol nn hivnegative result hiv test detect antibody blood either mean person infected virus time test heshe window period ie false negative see mean heshe immune virus nn hivpositive result positive hiv test result mean person hiv antibody hisher blood infected hiv mean heshe aid hiv test usually test presence antibody two main method hiv testing n hiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply n simplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa rapid test usually give result approximately 30 minute easy perform suitable combination three simplerapid test recommended facility elisa elisawestern blot testing available nn inconclusive indeterminate result small percentage hiv test result inconclu sive mean result neither positive negative may due number factor related hiv infection person early stage infection insufficient hiv antibody present give positive result happens test must repeated nn information education communication iec development communication strategy support material based formative research designed impact level knowledge influence behaviour among specific group nn mandatory testing testing screening required federal state local law compel individual submit hiv testing without informed consent within country conduct mandatory testing usually limited specific population cat egories health care provider member military prisoner people highrisk situation nn nutritional requirement aid patient usually need food intake 30 percent higher standard recommended level nn opportunistic infection oi infection occurs immune system weakened might cause disease serious person properly func tioning immune system nn peer education popular concept variously refers approach communication channel methodology andor intervention strategy peer education usually involves training supporting member given group background experience value effect change among member group often used influence knowledge attitude belief behaviour individual level however peer educa tion may also create change group societal level modifying norm stimulating collective action contributes change policy programme worldwide peer education one widely used hivaids awareness strategy nn postexposure prophylaxispostexposure prevention pep shortterm antiretroviral treatment reduce likelihood hiv infection potential exposure infected body fluid needlestick injury result rape treatment administered qualified health care practitioner essentially consists taking high dos arvs 28 day effective treatment must start within 2 72 hour possible exposure earlier treatment started effective success rate varies nn routine optin testing approach testing whereby individual offered hiv test standard part treatmenthealth check heshe receive indivi dual informed heshe right decide whether undergo test nn sentinel surveillance surveillance based selected population sample chosen repre sent relevant experience particular group nn seroconversion period blood start producing detectable antibody response hiv infection nn seropositive hiv antibody hivpositive nn sexually transmitted infection sti disease commonly transmitted vaginal oral anal sex presence sti indicative risk behaviour also increase actual risk contracting hiv nn sti syndromic management costeffective approach allows health worker diag nose sexually transmitted infection basis patient history symptom without need laboratory analysis treatment normally includes use broadspectrum antibiotic nn universal precaution simple infection control measure reduce risk transmis sion blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person n use new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recom mended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equip ment available n discard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full n document quality sterilization medical equipment used percuta neous procedure n wash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid n disinfect instrument contaminated equipment n handle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little po sible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water nn voluntary hiv testing clientinitiated hiv test whereby individual chooses go testing facilityprovider find hisher hiv status nn window period time period initial infection hiv body pro duction antibody three month time hiv test antibody may negative even though person virus infect others", "ProcessedSent": "nn sexually transmitted infection sti disease commonly transmitted vaginal oral anal sex", "SentID": 10108 }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181981,7 +181981,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -181992,14 +181992,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis.", + "Sentence": "\n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis.", "newParagraph": "term definition nn aid acquired immune deficiency syndrome stage hiv immune system depleted leaving body vulnerable one lifethreatening disease nn antiretrovirals arvs broad term main type treatment hiv aid arvs cure nn behaviourchange communication bcc participatory communitylevel process aimed developing positive behaviour promoting sustaining individual community societal behaviour change maintaining appropriate behaviour nn false negativepositive hiv test result wrong either giving negative result person hivpositive positive result person hivnegative nn hiv human immunodeficiency virus virus cause aid nn hiv confirmation test according whounaids recommendation positive hiv test result whether elisa enzymelinked immunabsorbent assay simplerapid test confirmed using second different test confirm accuracy two dif ferent rapid test laboratory facility available nn hiv counselling counselling generally offered hiv test order help individual understand risk behaviour cope hivpositive result stay hivnegative counselling service also link individual option treatment care support provides information stay healthy possible minimize risk transmission others test result shall confidential usually vol untary counselling testing service package ensures hiv test voluntary pre post test counselling offered informed consent obtained agreement medical test procedure clear explanation risk benefit hiv test performed using approved hiv test kit following testing protocol nn hivnegative result hiv test detect antibody blood either mean person infected virus time test heshe window period ie false negative see mean heshe immune virus nn hivpositive result positive hiv test result mean person hiv antibody hisher blood infected hiv mean heshe aid hiv test usually test presence antibody two main method hiv testing n hiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply n simplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa rapid test usually give result approximately 30 minute easy perform suitable combination three simplerapid test recommended facility elisa elisawestern blot testing available nn inconclusive indeterminate result small percentage hiv test result inconclu sive mean result neither positive negative may due number factor related hiv infection person early stage infection insufficient hiv antibody present give positive result happens test must repeated nn information education communication iec development communication strategy support material based formative research designed impact level knowledge influence behaviour among specific group nn mandatory testing testing screening required federal state local law compel individual submit hiv testing without informed consent within country conduct mandatory testing usually limited specific population cat egories health care provider member military prisoner people highrisk situation nn nutritional requirement aid patient usually need food intake 30 percent higher standard recommended level nn opportunistic infection oi infection occurs immune system weakened might cause disease serious person properly func tioning immune system nn peer education popular concept variously refers approach communication channel methodology andor intervention strategy peer education usually involves training supporting member given group background experience value effect change among member group often used influence knowledge attitude belief behaviour individual level however peer educa tion may also create change group societal level modifying norm stimulating collective action contributes change policy programme worldwide peer education one widely used hivaids awareness strategy nn postexposure prophylaxispostexposure prevention pep shortterm antiretroviral treatment reduce likelihood hiv infection potential exposure infected body fluid needlestick injury result rape treatment administered qualified health care practitioner essentially consists taking high dos arvs 28 day effective treatment must start within 2 72 hour possible exposure earlier treatment started effective success rate varies nn routine optin testing approach testing whereby individual offered hiv test standard part treatmenthealth check heshe receive indivi dual informed heshe right decide whether undergo test nn sentinel surveillance surveillance based selected population sample chosen repre sent relevant experience particular group nn seroconversion period blood start producing detectable antibody response hiv infection nn seropositive hiv antibody hivpositive nn sexually transmitted infection sti disease commonly transmitted vaginal oral anal sex presence sti indicative risk behaviour also increase actual risk contracting hiv nn sti syndromic management costeffective approach allows health worker diag nose sexually transmitted infection basis patient history symptom without need laboratory analysis treatment normally includes use broadspectrum antibiotic nn universal precaution simple infection control measure reduce risk transmis sion blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person n use new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recom mended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equip ment available n discard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full n document quality sterilization medical equipment used percuta neous procedure n wash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid n disinfect instrument contaminated equipment n handle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little po sible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water nn voluntary hiv testing clientinitiated hiv test whereby individual chooses go testing facilityprovider find hisher hiv status nn window period time period initial infection hiv body pro duction antibody three month time hiv test antibody may negative even though person virus infect others", "ProcessedSent": "nn sti syndromic management costeffective approach allows health worker diag nose sexually transmitted infection basis patient history symptom without need laboratory analysis", "SentID": 10110 }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182017,7 +182017,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182028,14 +182028,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers.", "newParagraph": "term definition nn aid acquired immune deficiency syndrome stage hiv immune system depleted leaving body vulnerable one lifethreatening disease nn antiretrovirals arvs broad term main type treatment hiv aid arvs cure nn behaviourchange communication bcc participatory communitylevel process aimed developing positive behaviour promoting sustaining individual community societal behaviour change maintaining appropriate behaviour nn false negativepositive hiv test result wrong either giving negative result person hivpositive positive result person hivnegative nn hiv human immunodeficiency virus virus cause aid nn hiv confirmation test according whounaids recommendation positive hiv test result whether elisa enzymelinked immunabsorbent assay simplerapid test confirmed using second different test confirm accuracy two dif ferent rapid test laboratory facility available nn hiv counselling counselling generally offered hiv test order help individual understand risk behaviour cope hivpositive result stay hivnegative counselling service also link individual option treatment care support provides information stay healthy possible minimize risk transmission others test result shall confidential usually vol untary counselling testing service package ensures hiv test voluntary pre post test counselling offered informed consent obtained agreement medical test procedure clear explanation risk benefit hiv test performed using approved hiv test kit following testing protocol nn hivnegative result hiv test detect antibody blood either mean person infected virus time test heshe window period ie false negative see mean heshe immune virus nn hivpositive result positive hiv test result mean person hiv antibody hisher blood infected hiv mean heshe aid hiv test usually test presence antibody two main method hiv testing n hiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply n simplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa rapid test usually give result approximately 30 minute easy perform suitable combination three simplerapid test recommended facility elisa elisawestern blot testing available nn inconclusive indeterminate result small percentage hiv test result inconclu sive mean result neither positive negative may due number factor related hiv infection person early stage infection insufficient hiv antibody present give positive result happens test must repeated nn information education communication iec development communication strategy support material based formative research designed impact level knowledge influence behaviour among specific group nn mandatory testing testing screening required federal state local law compel individual submit hiv testing without informed consent within country conduct mandatory testing usually limited specific population cat egories health care provider member military prisoner people highrisk situation nn nutritional requirement aid patient usually need food intake 30 percent higher standard recommended level nn opportunistic infection oi infection occurs immune system weakened might cause disease serious person properly func tioning immune system nn peer education popular concept variously refers approach communication channel methodology andor intervention strategy peer education usually involves training supporting member given group background experience value effect change among member group often used influence knowledge attitude belief behaviour individual level however peer educa tion may also create change group societal level modifying norm stimulating collective action contributes change policy programme worldwide peer education one widely used hivaids awareness strategy nn postexposure prophylaxispostexposure prevention pep shortterm antiretroviral treatment reduce likelihood hiv infection potential exposure infected body fluid needlestick injury result rape treatment administered qualified health care practitioner essentially consists taking high dos arvs 28 day effective treatment must start within 2 72 hour possible exposure earlier treatment started effective success rate varies nn routine optin testing approach testing whereby individual offered hiv test standard part treatmenthealth check heshe receive indivi dual informed heshe right decide whether undergo test nn sentinel surveillance surveillance based selected population sample chosen repre sent relevant experience particular group nn seroconversion period blood start producing detectable antibody response hiv infection nn seropositive hiv antibody hivpositive nn sexually transmitted infection sti disease commonly transmitted vaginal oral anal sex presence sti indicative risk behaviour also increase actual risk contracting hiv nn sti syndromic management costeffective approach allows health worker diag nose sexually transmitted infection basis patient history symptom without need laboratory analysis treatment normally includes use broadspectrum antibiotic nn universal precaution simple infection control measure reduce risk transmis sion blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person n use new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recom mended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equip ment available n discard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full n document quality sterilization medical equipment used percuta neous procedure n wash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid n disinfect instrument contaminated equipment n handle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little po sible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water nn voluntary hiv testing clientinitiated hiv test whereby individual chooses go testing facilityprovider find hisher hiv status nn window period time period initial infection hiv body pro duction antibody three month time hiv test antibody may negative even though person virus infect others", "ProcessedSent": "nn universal precaution simple infection control measure reduce risk transmis sion blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker", "SentID": 10112 }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182053,7 +182053,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182064,14 +182064,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended.", + "Sentence": "\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended.", "newParagraph": "term definition nn aid acquired immune deficiency syndrome stage hiv immune system depleted leaving body vulnerable one lifethreatening disease nn antiretrovirals arvs broad term main type treatment hiv aid arvs cure nn behaviourchange communication bcc participatory communitylevel process aimed developing positive behaviour promoting sustaining individual community societal behaviour change maintaining appropriate behaviour nn false negativepositive hiv test result wrong either giving negative result person hivpositive positive result person hivnegative nn hiv human immunodeficiency virus virus cause aid nn hiv confirmation test according whounaids recommendation positive hiv test result whether elisa enzymelinked immunabsorbent assay simplerapid test confirmed using second different test confirm accuracy two dif ferent rapid test laboratory facility available nn hiv counselling counselling generally offered hiv test order help individual understand risk behaviour cope hivpositive result stay hivnegative counselling service also link individual option treatment care support provides information stay healthy possible minimize risk transmission others test result shall confidential usually vol untary counselling testing service package ensures hiv test voluntary pre post test counselling offered informed consent obtained agreement medical test procedure clear explanation risk benefit hiv test performed using approved hiv test kit following testing protocol nn hivnegative result hiv test detect antibody blood either mean person infected virus time test heshe window period ie false negative see mean heshe immune virus nn hivpositive result positive hiv test result mean person hiv antibody hisher blood infected hiv mean heshe aid hiv test usually test presence antibody two main method hiv testing n hiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply n simplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa rapid test usually give result approximately 30 minute easy perform suitable combination three simplerapid test recommended facility elisa elisawestern blot testing available nn inconclusive indeterminate result small percentage hiv test result inconclu sive mean result neither positive negative may due number factor related hiv infection person early stage infection insufficient hiv antibody present give positive result happens test must repeated nn information education communication iec development communication strategy support material based formative research designed impact level knowledge influence behaviour among specific group nn mandatory testing testing screening required federal state local law compel individual submit hiv testing without informed consent within country conduct mandatory testing usually limited specific population cat egories health care provider member military prisoner people highrisk situation nn nutritional requirement aid patient usually need food intake 30 percent higher standard recommended level nn opportunistic infection oi infection occurs immune system weakened might cause disease serious person properly func tioning immune system nn peer education popular concept variously refers approach communication channel methodology andor intervention strategy peer education usually involves training supporting member given group background experience value effect change among member group often used influence knowledge attitude belief behaviour individual level however peer educa tion may also create change group societal level modifying norm stimulating collective action contributes change policy programme worldwide peer education one widely used hivaids awareness strategy nn postexposure prophylaxispostexposure prevention pep shortterm antiretroviral treatment reduce likelihood hiv infection potential exposure infected body fluid needlestick injury result rape treatment administered qualified health care practitioner essentially consists taking high dos arvs 28 day effective treatment must start within 2 72 hour possible exposure earlier treatment started effective success rate varies nn routine optin testing approach testing whereby individual offered hiv test standard part treatmenthealth check heshe receive indivi dual informed heshe right decide whether undergo test nn sentinel surveillance surveillance based selected population sample chosen repre sent relevant experience particular group nn seroconversion period blood start producing detectable antibody response hiv infection nn seropositive hiv antibody hivpositive nn sexually transmitted infection sti disease commonly transmitted vaginal oral anal sex presence sti indicative risk behaviour also increase actual risk contracting hiv nn sti syndromic management costeffective approach allows health worker diag nose sexually transmitted infection basis patient history symptom without need laboratory analysis treatment normally includes use broadspectrum antibiotic nn universal precaution simple infection control measure reduce risk transmis sion blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person n use new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recom mended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equip ment available n discard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full n document quality sterilization medical equipment used percuta neous procedure n wash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid n disinfect instrument contaminated equipment n handle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little po sible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water nn voluntary hiv testing clientinitiated hiv test whereby individual chooses go testing facilityprovider find hisher hiv status nn window period time period initial infection hiv body pro duction antibody three month time hiv test antibody may negative even though person virus infect others", "ProcessedSent": "n use new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recom mended", "SentID": 10114 }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182089,7 +182089,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182100,14 +182100,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full.", + "Sentence": "\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full.", "newParagraph": "term definition nn aid acquired immune deficiency syndrome stage hiv immune system depleted leaving body vulnerable one lifethreatening disease nn antiretrovirals arvs broad term main type treatment hiv aid arvs cure nn behaviourchange communication bcc participatory communitylevel process aimed developing positive behaviour promoting sustaining individual community societal behaviour change maintaining appropriate behaviour nn false negativepositive hiv test result wrong either giving negative result person hivpositive positive result person hivnegative nn hiv human immunodeficiency virus virus cause aid nn hiv confirmation test according whounaids recommendation positive hiv test result whether elisa enzymelinked immunabsorbent assay simplerapid test confirmed using second different test confirm accuracy two dif ferent rapid test laboratory facility available nn hiv counselling counselling generally offered hiv test order help individual understand risk behaviour cope hivpositive result stay hivnegative counselling service also link individual option treatment care support provides information stay healthy possible minimize risk transmission others test result shall confidential usually vol untary counselling testing service package ensures hiv test voluntary pre post test counselling offered informed consent obtained agreement medical test procedure clear explanation risk benefit hiv test performed using approved hiv test kit following testing protocol nn hivnegative result hiv test detect antibody blood either mean person infected virus time test heshe window period ie false negative see mean heshe immune virus nn hivpositive result positive hiv test result mean person hiv antibody hisher blood infected hiv mean heshe aid hiv test usually test presence antibody two main method hiv testing n hiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply n simplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa rapid test usually give result approximately 30 minute easy perform suitable combination three simplerapid test recommended facility elisa elisawestern blot testing available nn inconclusive indeterminate result small percentage hiv test result inconclu sive mean result neither positive negative may due number factor related hiv infection person early stage infection insufficient hiv antibody present give positive result happens test must repeated nn information education communication iec development communication strategy support material based formative research designed impact level knowledge influence behaviour among specific group nn mandatory testing testing screening required federal state local law compel individual submit hiv testing without informed consent within country conduct mandatory testing usually limited specific population cat egories health care provider member military prisoner people highrisk situation nn nutritional requirement aid patient usually need food intake 30 percent higher standard recommended level nn opportunistic infection oi infection occurs immune system weakened might cause disease serious person properly func tioning immune system nn peer education popular concept variously refers approach communication channel methodology andor intervention strategy peer education usually involves training supporting member given group background experience value effect change among member group often used influence knowledge attitude belief behaviour individual level however peer educa tion may also create change group societal level modifying norm stimulating collective action contributes change policy programme worldwide peer education one widely used hivaids awareness strategy nn postexposure prophylaxispostexposure prevention pep shortterm antiretroviral treatment reduce likelihood hiv infection potential exposure infected body fluid needlestick injury result rape treatment administered qualified health care practitioner essentially consists taking high dos arvs 28 day effective treatment must start within 2 72 hour possible exposure earlier treatment started effective success rate varies nn routine optin testing approach testing whereby individual offered hiv test standard part treatmenthealth check heshe receive indivi dual informed heshe right decide whether undergo test nn sentinel surveillance surveillance based selected population sample chosen repre sent relevant experience particular group nn seroconversion period blood start producing detectable antibody response hiv infection nn seropositive hiv antibody hivpositive nn sexually transmitted infection sti disease commonly transmitted vaginal oral anal sex presence sti indicative risk behaviour also increase actual risk contracting hiv nn sti syndromic management costeffective approach allows health worker diag nose sexually transmitted infection basis patient history symptom without need laboratory analysis treatment normally includes use broadspectrum antibiotic nn universal precaution simple infection control measure reduce risk transmis sion blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person n use new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recom mended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equip ment available n discard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full n document quality sterilization medical equipment used percuta neous procedure n wash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid n disinfect instrument contaminated equipment n handle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little po sible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water nn voluntary hiv testing clientinitiated hiv test whereby individual chooses go testing facilityprovider find hisher hiv status nn window period time period initial infection hiv body pro duction antibody three month time hiv test antibody may negative even though person virus infect others", "ProcessedSent": "n discard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full", "SentID": 10116 }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182118,14 +182118,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures.", + "Sentence": "\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures.", "newParagraph": "term definition nn aid acquired immune deficiency syndrome stage hiv immune system depleted leaving body vulnerable one lifethreatening disease nn antiretrovirals arvs broad term main type treatment hiv aid arvs cure nn behaviourchange communication bcc participatory communitylevel process aimed developing positive behaviour promoting sustaining individual community societal behaviour change maintaining appropriate behaviour nn false negativepositive hiv test result wrong either giving negative result person hivpositive positive result person hivnegative nn hiv human immunodeficiency virus virus cause aid nn hiv confirmation test according whounaids recommendation positive hiv test result whether elisa enzymelinked immunabsorbent assay simplerapid test confirmed using second different test confirm accuracy two dif ferent rapid test laboratory facility available nn hiv counselling counselling generally offered hiv test order help individual understand risk behaviour cope hivpositive result stay hivnegative counselling service also link individual option treatment care support provides information stay healthy possible minimize risk transmission others test result shall confidential usually vol untary counselling testing service package ensures hiv test voluntary pre post test counselling offered informed consent obtained agreement medical test procedure clear explanation risk benefit hiv test performed using approved hiv test kit following testing protocol nn hivnegative result hiv test detect antibody blood either mean person infected virus time test heshe window period ie false negative see mean heshe immune virus nn hivpositive result positive hiv test result mean person hiv antibody hisher blood infected hiv mean heshe aid hiv test usually test presence antibody two main method hiv testing n hiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply n simplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa rapid test usually give result approximately 30 minute easy perform suitable combination three simplerapid test recommended facility elisa elisawestern blot testing available nn inconclusive indeterminate result small percentage hiv test result inconclu sive mean result neither positive negative may due number factor related hiv infection person early stage infection insufficient hiv antibody present give positive result happens test must repeated nn information education communication iec development communication strategy support material based formative research designed impact level knowledge influence behaviour among specific group nn mandatory testing testing screening required federal state local law compel individual submit hiv testing without informed consent within country conduct mandatory testing usually limited specific population cat egories health care provider member military prisoner people highrisk situation nn nutritional requirement aid patient usually need food intake 30 percent higher standard recommended level nn opportunistic infection oi infection occurs immune system weakened might cause disease serious person properly func tioning immune system nn peer education popular concept variously refers approach communication channel methodology andor intervention strategy peer education usually involves training supporting member given group background experience value effect change among member group often used influence knowledge attitude belief behaviour individual level however peer educa tion may also create change group societal level modifying norm stimulating collective action contributes change policy programme worldwide peer education one widely used hivaids awareness strategy nn postexposure prophylaxispostexposure prevention pep shortterm antiretroviral treatment reduce likelihood hiv infection potential exposure infected body fluid needlestick injury result rape treatment administered qualified health care practitioner essentially consists taking high dos arvs 28 day effective treatment must start within 2 72 hour possible exposure earlier treatment started effective success rate varies nn routine optin testing approach testing whereby individual offered hiv test standard part treatmenthealth check heshe receive indivi dual informed heshe right decide whether undergo test nn sentinel surveillance surveillance based selected population sample chosen repre sent relevant experience particular group nn seroconversion period blood start producing detectable antibody response hiv infection nn seropositive hiv antibody hivpositive nn sexually transmitted infection sti disease commonly transmitted vaginal oral anal sex presence sti indicative risk behaviour also increase actual risk contracting hiv nn sti syndromic management costeffective approach allows health worker diag nose sexually transmitted infection basis patient history symptom without need laboratory analysis treatment normally includes use broadspectrum antibiotic nn universal precaution simple infection control measure reduce risk transmis sion blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person n use new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recom mended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equip ment available n discard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full n document quality sterilization medical equipment used percuta neous procedure n wash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid n disinfect instrument contaminated equipment n handle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little po sible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water nn voluntary hiv testing clientinitiated hiv test whereby individual chooses go testing facilityprovider find hisher hiv status nn window period time period initial infection hiv body pro duction antibody three month time hiv test antibody may negative even though person virus infect others", "ProcessedSent": "n document quality sterilization medical equipment used percuta neous procedure", "SentID": 10117 }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182136,14 +182136,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids.", + "Sentence": "\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids.", "newParagraph": "term definition nn aid acquired immune deficiency syndrome stage hiv immune system depleted leaving body vulnerable one lifethreatening disease nn antiretrovirals arvs broad term main type treatment hiv aid arvs cure nn behaviourchange communication bcc participatory communitylevel process aimed developing positive behaviour promoting sustaining individual community societal behaviour change maintaining appropriate behaviour nn false negativepositive hiv test result wrong either giving negative result person hivpositive positive result person hivnegative nn hiv human immunodeficiency virus virus cause aid nn hiv confirmation test according whounaids recommendation positive hiv test result whether elisa enzymelinked immunabsorbent assay simplerapid test confirmed using second different test confirm accuracy two dif ferent rapid test laboratory facility available nn hiv counselling counselling generally offered hiv test order help individual understand risk behaviour cope hivpositive result stay hivnegative counselling service also link individual option treatment care support provides information stay healthy possible minimize risk transmission others test result shall confidential usually vol untary counselling testing service package ensures hiv test voluntary pre post test counselling offered informed consent obtained agreement medical test procedure clear explanation risk benefit hiv test performed using approved hiv test kit following testing protocol nn hivnegative result hiv test detect antibody blood either mean person infected virus time test heshe window period ie false negative see mean heshe immune virus nn hivpositive result positive hiv test result mean person hiv antibody hisher blood infected hiv mean heshe aid hiv test usually test presence antibody two main method hiv testing n hiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply n simplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa rapid test usually give result approximately 30 minute easy perform suitable combination three simplerapid test recommended facility elisa elisawestern blot testing available nn inconclusive indeterminate result small percentage hiv test result inconclu sive mean result neither positive negative may due number factor related hiv infection person early stage infection insufficient hiv antibody present give positive result happens test must repeated nn information education communication iec development communication strategy support material based formative research designed impact level knowledge influence behaviour among specific group nn mandatory testing testing screening required federal state local law compel individual submit hiv testing without informed consent within country conduct mandatory testing usually limited specific population cat egories health care provider member military prisoner people highrisk situation nn nutritional requirement aid patient usually need food intake 30 percent higher standard recommended level nn opportunistic infection oi infection occurs immune system weakened might cause disease serious person properly func tioning immune system nn peer education popular concept variously refers approach communication channel methodology andor intervention strategy peer education usually involves training supporting member given group background experience value effect change among member group often used influence knowledge attitude belief behaviour individual level however peer educa tion may also create change group societal level modifying norm stimulating collective action contributes change policy programme worldwide peer education one widely used hivaids awareness strategy nn postexposure prophylaxispostexposure prevention pep shortterm antiretroviral treatment reduce likelihood hiv infection potential exposure infected body fluid needlestick injury result rape treatment administered qualified health care practitioner essentially consists taking high dos arvs 28 day effective treatment must start within 2 72 hour possible exposure earlier treatment started effective success rate varies nn routine optin testing approach testing whereby individual offered hiv test standard part treatmenthealth check heshe receive indivi dual informed heshe right decide whether undergo test nn sentinel surveillance surveillance based selected population sample chosen repre sent relevant experience particular group nn seroconversion period blood start producing detectable antibody response hiv infection nn seropositive hiv antibody hivpositive nn sexually transmitted infection sti disease commonly transmitted vaginal oral anal sex presence sti indicative risk behaviour also increase actual risk contracting hiv nn sti syndromic management costeffective approach allows health worker diag nose sexually transmitted infection basis patient history symptom without need laboratory analysis treatment normally includes use broadspectrum antibiotic nn universal precaution simple infection control measure reduce risk transmis sion blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person n use new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recom mended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equip ment available n discard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full n document quality sterilization medical equipment used percuta neous procedure n wash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid n disinfect instrument contaminated equipment n handle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little po sible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water nn voluntary hiv testing clientinitiated hiv test whereby individual chooses go testing facilityprovider find hisher hiv status nn window period time period initial infection hiv body pro duction antibody three month time hiv test antibody may negative even though person virus infect others", "ProcessedSent": "n wash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid", "SentID": 10118 }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182154,14 +182154,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment.", + "Sentence": "\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment.", "newParagraph": "term definition nn aid acquired immune deficiency syndrome stage hiv immune system depleted leaving body vulnerable one lifethreatening disease nn antiretrovirals arvs broad term main type treatment hiv aid arvs cure nn behaviourchange communication bcc participatory communitylevel process aimed developing positive behaviour promoting sustaining individual community societal behaviour change maintaining appropriate behaviour nn false negativepositive hiv test result wrong either giving negative result person hivpositive positive result person hivnegative nn hiv human immunodeficiency virus virus cause aid nn hiv confirmation test according whounaids recommendation positive hiv test result whether elisa enzymelinked immunabsorbent assay simplerapid test confirmed using second different test confirm accuracy two dif ferent rapid test laboratory facility available nn hiv counselling counselling generally offered hiv test order help individual understand risk behaviour cope hivpositive result stay hivnegative counselling service also link individual option treatment care support provides information stay healthy possible minimize risk transmission others test result shall confidential usually vol untary counselling testing service package ensures hiv test voluntary pre post test counselling offered informed consent obtained agreement medical test procedure clear explanation risk benefit hiv test performed using approved hiv test kit following testing protocol nn hivnegative result hiv test detect antibody blood either mean person infected virus time test heshe window period ie false negative see mean heshe immune virus nn hivpositive result positive hiv test result mean person hiv antibody hisher blood infected hiv mean heshe aid hiv test usually test presence antibody two main method hiv testing n hiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply n simplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa rapid test usually give result approximately 30 minute easy perform suitable combination three simplerapid test recommended facility elisa elisawestern blot testing available nn inconclusive indeterminate result small percentage hiv test result inconclu sive mean result neither positive negative may due number factor related hiv infection person early stage infection insufficient hiv antibody present give positive result happens test must repeated nn information education communication iec development communication strategy support material based formative research designed impact level knowledge influence behaviour among specific group nn mandatory testing testing screening required federal state local law compel individual submit hiv testing without informed consent within country conduct mandatory testing usually limited specific population cat egories health care provider member military prisoner people highrisk situation nn nutritional requirement aid patient usually need food intake 30 percent higher standard recommended level nn opportunistic infection oi infection occurs immune system weakened might cause disease serious person properly func tioning immune system nn peer education popular concept variously refers approach communication channel methodology andor intervention strategy peer education usually involves training supporting member given group background experience value effect change among member group often used influence knowledge attitude belief behaviour individual level however peer educa tion may also create change group societal level modifying norm stimulating collective action contributes change policy programme worldwide peer education one widely used hivaids awareness strategy nn postexposure prophylaxispostexposure prevention pep shortterm antiretroviral treatment reduce likelihood hiv infection potential exposure infected body fluid needlestick injury result rape treatment administered qualified health care practitioner essentially consists taking high dos arvs 28 day effective treatment must start within 2 72 hour possible exposure earlier treatment started effective success rate varies nn routine optin testing approach testing whereby individual offered hiv test standard part treatmenthealth check heshe receive indivi dual informed heshe right decide whether undergo test nn sentinel surveillance surveillance based selected population sample chosen repre sent relevant experience particular group nn seroconversion period blood start producing detectable antibody response hiv infection nn seropositive hiv antibody hivpositive nn sexually transmitted infection sti disease commonly transmitted vaginal oral anal sex presence sti indicative risk behaviour also increase actual risk contracting hiv nn sti syndromic management costeffective approach allows health worker diag nose sexually transmitted infection basis patient history symptom without need laboratory analysis treatment normally includes use broadspectrum antibiotic nn universal precaution simple infection control measure reduce risk transmis sion blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person n use new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recom mended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equip ment available n discard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full n document quality sterilization medical equipment used percuta neous procedure n wash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid n disinfect instrument contaminated equipment n handle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little po sible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water nn voluntary hiv testing clientinitiated hiv test whereby individual chooses go testing facilityprovider find hisher hiv status nn window period time period initial infection hiv body pro duction antibody three month time hiv test antibody may negative even though person virus infect others", "ProcessedSent": "n disinfect instrument contaminated equipment", "SentID": 10119 }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182172,14 +182172,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Handle properly soiled linen with care.", + "Sentence": "\n Handle properly soiled linen with care.", "newParagraph": "term definition nn aid acquired immune deficiency syndrome stage hiv immune system depleted leaving body vulnerable one lifethreatening disease nn antiretrovirals arvs broad term main type treatment hiv aid arvs cure nn behaviourchange communication bcc participatory communitylevel process aimed developing positive behaviour promoting sustaining individual community societal behaviour change maintaining appropriate behaviour nn false negativepositive hiv test result wrong either giving negative result person hivpositive positive result person hivnegative nn hiv human immunodeficiency virus virus cause aid nn hiv confirmation test according whounaids recommendation positive hiv test result whether elisa enzymelinked immunabsorbent assay simplerapid test confirmed using second different test confirm accuracy two dif ferent rapid test laboratory facility available nn hiv counselling counselling generally offered hiv test order help individual understand risk behaviour cope hivpositive result stay hivnegative counselling service also link individual option treatment care support provides information stay healthy possible minimize risk transmission others test result shall confidential usually vol untary counselling testing service package ensures hiv test voluntary pre post test counselling offered informed consent obtained agreement medical test procedure clear explanation risk benefit hiv test performed using approved hiv test kit following testing protocol nn hivnegative result hiv test detect antibody blood either mean person infected virus time test heshe window period ie false negative see mean heshe immune virus nn hivpositive result positive hiv test result mean person hiv antibody hisher blood infected hiv mean heshe aid hiv test usually test presence antibody two main method hiv testing n hiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply n simplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa rapid test usually give result approximately 30 minute easy perform suitable combination three simplerapid test recommended facility elisa elisawestern blot testing available nn inconclusive indeterminate result small percentage hiv test result inconclu sive mean result neither positive negative may due number factor related hiv infection person early stage infection insufficient hiv antibody present give positive result happens test must repeated nn information education communication iec development communication strategy support material based formative research designed impact level knowledge influence behaviour among specific group nn mandatory testing testing screening required federal state local law compel individual submit hiv testing without informed consent within country conduct mandatory testing usually limited specific population cat egories health care provider member military prisoner people highrisk situation nn nutritional requirement aid patient usually need food intake 30 percent higher standard recommended level nn opportunistic infection oi infection occurs immune system weakened might cause disease serious person properly func tioning immune system nn peer education popular concept variously refers approach communication channel methodology andor intervention strategy peer education usually involves training supporting member given group background experience value effect change among member group often used influence knowledge attitude belief behaviour individual level however peer educa tion may also create change group societal level modifying norm stimulating collective action contributes change policy programme worldwide peer education one widely used hivaids awareness strategy nn postexposure prophylaxispostexposure prevention pep shortterm antiretroviral treatment reduce likelihood hiv infection potential exposure infected body fluid needlestick injury result rape treatment administered qualified health care practitioner essentially consists taking high dos arvs 28 day effective treatment must start within 2 72 hour possible exposure earlier treatment started effective success rate varies nn routine optin testing approach testing whereby individual offered hiv test standard part treatmenthealth check heshe receive indivi dual informed heshe right decide whether undergo test nn sentinel surveillance surveillance based selected population sample chosen repre sent relevant experience particular group nn seroconversion period blood start producing detectable antibody response hiv infection nn seropositive hiv antibody hivpositive nn sexually transmitted infection sti disease commonly transmitted vaginal oral anal sex presence sti indicative risk behaviour also increase actual risk contracting hiv nn sti syndromic management costeffective approach allows health worker diag nose sexually transmitted infection basis patient history symptom without need laboratory analysis treatment normally includes use broadspectrum antibiotic nn universal precaution simple infection control measure reduce risk transmis sion blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person n use new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recom mended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equip ment available n discard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full n document quality sterilization medical equipment used percuta neous procedure n wash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid n disinfect instrument contaminated equipment n handle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little po sible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water nn voluntary hiv testing clientinitiated hiv test whereby individual chooses go testing facilityprovider find hisher hiv status nn window period time period initial infection hiv body pro duction antibody three month time hiv test antibody may negative even though person virus infect others", "ProcessedSent": "n handle properly soiled linen care", "SentID": 10120 }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182197,7 +182197,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182215,7 +182215,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182233,7 +182233,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182244,14 +182244,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status.", "newParagraph": "term definition nn aid acquired immune deficiency syndrome stage hiv immune system depleted leaving body vulnerable one lifethreatening disease nn antiretrovirals arvs broad term main type treatment hiv aid arvs cure nn behaviourchange communication bcc participatory communitylevel process aimed developing positive behaviour promoting sustaining individual community societal behaviour change maintaining appropriate behaviour nn false negativepositive hiv test result wrong either giving negative result person hivpositive positive result person hivnegative nn hiv human immunodeficiency virus virus cause aid nn hiv confirmation test according whounaids recommendation positive hiv test result whether elisa enzymelinked immunabsorbent assay simplerapid test confirmed using second different test confirm accuracy two dif ferent rapid test laboratory facility available nn hiv counselling counselling generally offered hiv test order help individual understand risk behaviour cope hivpositive result stay hivnegative counselling service also link individual option treatment care support provides information stay healthy possible minimize risk transmission others test result shall confidential usually vol untary counselling testing service package ensures hiv test voluntary pre post test counselling offered informed consent obtained agreement medical test procedure clear explanation risk benefit hiv test performed using approved hiv test kit following testing protocol nn hivnegative result hiv test detect antibody blood either mean person infected virus time test heshe window period ie false negative see mean heshe immune virus nn hivpositive result positive hiv test result mean person hiv antibody hisher blood infected hiv mean heshe aid hiv test usually test presence antibody two main method hiv testing n hiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply n simplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa rapid test usually give result approximately 30 minute easy perform suitable combination three simplerapid test recommended facility elisa elisawestern blot testing available nn inconclusive indeterminate result small percentage hiv test result inconclu sive mean result neither positive negative may due number factor related hiv infection person early stage infection insufficient hiv antibody present give positive result happens test must repeated nn information education communication iec development communication strategy support material based formative research designed impact level knowledge influence behaviour among specific group nn mandatory testing testing screening required federal state local law compel individual submit hiv testing without informed consent within country conduct mandatory testing usually limited specific population cat egories health care provider member military prisoner people highrisk situation nn nutritional requirement aid patient usually need food intake 30 percent higher standard recommended level nn opportunistic infection oi infection occurs immune system weakened might cause disease serious person properly func tioning immune system nn peer education popular concept variously refers approach communication channel methodology andor intervention strategy peer education usually involves training supporting member given group background experience value effect change among member group often used influence knowledge attitude belief behaviour individual level however peer educa tion may also create change group societal level modifying norm stimulating collective action contributes change policy programme worldwide peer education one widely used hivaids awareness strategy nn postexposure prophylaxispostexposure prevention pep shortterm antiretroviral treatment reduce likelihood hiv infection potential exposure infected body fluid needlestick injury result rape treatment administered qualified health care practitioner essentially consists taking high dos arvs 28 day effective treatment must start within 2 72 hour possible exposure earlier treatment started effective success rate varies nn routine optin testing approach testing whereby individual offered hiv test standard part treatmenthealth check heshe receive indivi dual informed heshe right decide whether undergo test nn sentinel surveillance surveillance based selected population sample chosen repre sent relevant experience particular group nn seroconversion period blood start producing detectable antibody response hiv infection nn seropositive hiv antibody hivpositive nn sexually transmitted infection sti disease commonly transmitted vaginal oral anal sex presence sti indicative risk behaviour also increase actual risk contracting hiv nn sti syndromic management costeffective approach allows health worker diag nose sexually transmitted infection basis patient history symptom without need laboratory analysis treatment normally includes use broadspectrum antibiotic nn universal precaution simple infection control measure reduce risk transmis sion blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person n use new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recom mended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equip ment available n discard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full n document quality sterilization medical equipment used percuta neous procedure n wash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid n disinfect instrument contaminated equipment n handle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little po sible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water nn voluntary hiv testing clientinitiated hiv test whereby individual chooses go testing facilityprovider find hisher hiv status nn window period time period initial infection hiv body pro duction antibody three month time hiv test antibody may negative even though person virus infect others", "ProcessedSent": "nn voluntary hiv testing clientinitiated hiv test whereby individual chooses go testing facilityprovider find hisher hiv status", "SentID": 10124 }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182262,14 +182262,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months.", "newParagraph": "term definition nn aid acquired immune deficiency syndrome stage hiv immune system depleted leaving body vulnerable one lifethreatening disease nn antiretrovirals arvs broad term main type treatment hiv aid arvs cure nn behaviourchange communication bcc participatory communitylevel process aimed developing positive behaviour promoting sustaining individual community societal behaviour change maintaining appropriate behaviour nn false negativepositive hiv test result wrong either giving negative result person hivpositive positive result person hivnegative nn hiv human immunodeficiency virus virus cause aid nn hiv confirmation test according whounaids recommendation positive hiv test result whether elisa enzymelinked immunabsorbent assay simplerapid test confirmed using second different test confirm accuracy two dif ferent rapid test laboratory facility available nn hiv counselling counselling generally offered hiv test order help individual understand risk behaviour cope hivpositive result stay hivnegative counselling service also link individual option treatment care support provides information stay healthy possible minimize risk transmission others test result shall confidential usually vol untary counselling testing service package ensures hiv test voluntary pre post test counselling offered informed consent obtained agreement medical test procedure clear explanation risk benefit hiv test performed using approved hiv test kit following testing protocol nn hivnegative result hiv test detect antibody blood either mean person infected virus time test heshe window period ie false negative see mean heshe immune virus nn hivpositive result positive hiv test result mean person hiv antibody hisher blood infected hiv mean heshe aid hiv test usually test presence antibody two main method hiv testing n hiv elisa enzymelinked immunoabsorbent assay test efficient test testing large number per day requires laboratory facility equipment maintenance staff reliable power supply n simplerapid hiv test require special equipment highly trained staff accurate elisa rapid test usually give result approximately 30 minute easy perform suitable combination three simplerapid test recommended facility elisa elisawestern blot testing available nn inconclusive indeterminate result small percentage hiv test result inconclu sive mean result neither positive negative may due number factor related hiv infection person early stage infection insufficient hiv antibody present give positive result happens test must repeated nn information education communication iec development communication strategy support material based formative research designed impact level knowledge influence behaviour among specific group nn mandatory testing testing screening required federal state local law compel individual submit hiv testing without informed consent within country conduct mandatory testing usually limited specific population cat egories health care provider member military prisoner people highrisk situation nn nutritional requirement aid patient usually need food intake 30 percent higher standard recommended level nn opportunistic infection oi infection occurs immune system weakened might cause disease serious person properly func tioning immune system nn peer education popular concept variously refers approach communication channel methodology andor intervention strategy peer education usually involves training supporting member given group background experience value effect change among member group often used influence knowledge attitude belief behaviour individual level however peer educa tion may also create change group societal level modifying norm stimulating collective action contributes change policy programme worldwide peer education one widely used hivaids awareness strategy nn postexposure prophylaxispostexposure prevention pep shortterm antiretroviral treatment reduce likelihood hiv infection potential exposure infected body fluid needlestick injury result rape treatment administered qualified health care practitioner essentially consists taking high dos arvs 28 day effective treatment must start within 2 72 hour possible exposure earlier treatment started effective success rate varies nn routine optin testing approach testing whereby individual offered hiv test standard part treatmenthealth check heshe receive indivi dual informed heshe right decide whether undergo test nn sentinel surveillance surveillance based selected population sample chosen repre sent relevant experience particular group nn seroconversion period blood start producing detectable antibody response hiv infection nn seropositive hiv antibody hivpositive nn sexually transmitted infection sti disease commonly transmitted vaginal oral anal sex presence sti indicative risk behaviour also increase actual risk contracting hiv nn sti syndromic management costeffective approach allows health worker diag nose sexually transmitted infection basis patient history symptom without need laboratory analysis treatment normally includes use broadspectrum antibiotic nn universal precaution simple infection control measure reduce risk transmis sion blood borne pathogen exposure blood body fluid among patient health care worker universal precaution principle blood body fluid person considered infected hiv regardless known supposed status person n use new singleuse disposable injection equipment injection highly recom mended sterilising injection equipment considered singleuse equip ment available n discard contaminated sharp immediately without recapping puncture liquidproof container closed sealed destroyed completely full n document quality sterilization medical equipment used percuta neous procedure n wash hand soap water procedure use protective barrier glove gown apron mask goggles direct contact blood body fluid n disinfect instrument contaminated equipment n handle properly soiled linen care soiled linen handled little po sible glove leakproof bag used necessary cleaning occur outside patient area using detergent hot water nn voluntary hiv testing clientinitiated hiv test whereby individual chooses go testing facilityprovider find hisher hiv status nn window period time period initial infection hiv body pro duction antibody three month time hiv test antibody may negative even though person virus infect others", "ProcessedSent": "nn window period time period initial infection hiv body pro duction antibody three month", "SentID": 10125 }, { "ParagraphID": 2892, - "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \\n\\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \\n\\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \\n\\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \\n\\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \\n\\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \\n\\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \\n\\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \\n\\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \\n\\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \\n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \\n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \\n\\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \\n\\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \\n\\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \\n\\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \\n\\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \\n\\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \\n\\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \\n\\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \\n\\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \\n\\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \\n\\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \\n\\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \\n\\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \\n\\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \\n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \\n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \\n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \\n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \\n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \\n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \\n\\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \\n\\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", + "Paragraph": "Terms and definitions \n\n AIDS: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: the stage of HIV when the immune system is depleted, leaving the body vulnerable to one or more life-threatening diseases. \n\n Anti-retrovirals (ARVs): Broad term for the main type of treatment for HIV and AIDS. ARVs are not a cure. \n\n Behaviour-change communication (BCC): A participatory, community-level process aimed at developing positive behaviours; promoting and sustaining individual, community and societal behaviour change; and maintaining appropriate behaviours. \n\n False negative\/positive: HIV test result that is wrong, either giving a negative result when the person is HIV-positive, or a positive result when the person is HIV-negative. \n\n HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, the virus that causes AIDS. \n\n HIV confirmation tests: According to WHO\/UNAIDS recommendations, all positive HIV- test results (whether ELISA [enzyme-linked immunabsorbent assay] or simple\/rapid tests) should be confirmed using a second, different test to confirm accuracy, or two further dif- ferent rapid tests if laboratory facilities are not available. \n\n HIV counselling: Counselling generally offered before and after an HIV test in order to help individuals understand their risk behaviour and cope with an HIV-positive result or stay HIV-negative. The counselling service also links individuals to options for treatment, care and support, and provides information on how to stay as healthy as possible and how to minimize the risk of transmission to others. Test results shall be confidential. Usually a vol- untary counselling and testing service package ensures that: the HIV test is voluntary; pre and post test counselling is offered; informed consent is obtained (agreement to a medical test or procedure after clear explanation of risks and benefits); and HIV tests are performed using approved HIV test kits and following testing protocols. \n\n HIV-negative result: The HIV test did not detect any antibodies in the blood. This either means that the person is not infected with the virus at the time of the test or that he\/she is in the \u2018window period\u2019 (i.e., false negative, see above). It does not mean that he\/she is immune to the virus. \n\n HIV-positive result: A positive HIV test result means that a person has the HIV antibodies in his\/her blood and is infected with HIV. It does not mean that he\/she has AIDS. HIV test: Usually a test for the presence of antibodies. There are two main methods of HIV testing: \n HIV ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay) test: This is the most efficient test for testing large numbers per day, but requires laboratory facilities with equipment, maintenance staff and a reliable power supply; \n Simple\/rapid HIV tests: These do not require special equipment or highly trained staff and are as accurate as ELISA. Rapid tests will usually give results in approximately 30 minutes and are easy to perform. Suitable combinations of three simple\/rapid tests are recommended by WHO where facilities for ELISA or ELISA\/Western Blot testing are not available. \n\n Inconclusive (indeterminate) result: A small percentage of HIV test results are inconclu- sive. This means that the result is neither positive nor negative. This may be due to a number of factors that are not related to HIV infection, or it can be because of the person is in the early stages of infection when there are insufficient HIV antibodies present to give a positive result. If this happens the test must be repeated. \n\n Information, education and communication (IEC): The development of communication strategies and support materials, based on formative research and designed to impact on levels of knowledge and influence behaviours among specific groups. \n\n Mandatory testing: Testing or screening required by federal, state, or local law to compel individuals to submit to HIV testing without informed consent. Within those countries that conduct mandatory testing, it is usually limited to specific \u2018populations\u2019 such as cat- egories of health care providers, members of the military, prisoners or people in high-risk situations. \n\n Nutritional requirements: AIDS patients usually need a food intake that is 30 percent higher than standard recommended levels. \n\n Opportunistic infection (OI): Infection that occurs when an immune system is weakened, but which might not cause a disease \u2014 or be as serious \u2014 in a person with a properly func- tioning immune system. \n\n Peer education: A popular concept that variously refers to an approach, a communication channel, a methodology and\/or an intervention strategy. Peer education usually involves training and supporting members of a given group with the same background, experience and values to effect change among members of that group. It is often used to influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours at the individual level. However, peer educa- tion may also create change at the group or societal level by modifying norms and stimulating collective action that contributes to changes in policies and programmes. Worldwide, peer education is one of the most widely used HIV\/AIDS awareness strategies. \n\n Post-exposure prophylaxis\/post-exposure prevention (PEP): A short-term antiretroviral treatment that reduce the likelihood of HIV infection after potential exposure to infected body fluids, such as through a needle-stick injury or as a result of rape. The treatment should only be administered by a qualified health care practitioner. It essentially consists of taking high doses of ARVs for 28 days. To be effective, the treatment must start within 2 to 72 hours of the possible exposure; the earlier the treatment is started, the more effective it is. Its success rate varies. \n\n Routine opt-in testing: Approach to testing whereby the individual is offered an HIV test as a standard part of a treatment\/health check that he\/she is about to receive. The indivi- dual is informed that he\/she has the right to decide whether or not to undergo the test. \n\n Sentinel surveillance: Surveillance based on selected population samples chosen to repre- sent the relevant experience of particular groups. \n\n Sero-conversion: The period when the blood starts producing detectable antibodies in response to HIV infection. \n\n Sero-positive: Having HIV antibodies; being HIV-positive. \n\n Sexually transmitted infection (STI): Disease that is commonly transmitted through vaginal, oral or anal sex. The presence of an STI is indicative of risk behaviour and also increases the actual risk of contracting HIV. \n\n STI syndromic management: A cost-effective approach that allows health workers to diag- nose sexually transmitted infections on the basis of a patient\u2019s history and symptoms, without the need for laboratory analysis. Treatment normally includes the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. \n\n Universal precautions: Simple infection control measures that reduce the risk of transmis- sion of blood borne pathogens through exposure to blood or body fluids among patients and health care workers. Under the \u2018universal precaution\u2019 principle, blood and body fluids from all persons should be considered as infected with HIV, regardless of the known or supposed status of the person. \n Use of new, single-use disposable injection equipment for all injections is highly recom- mended. Sterilising injection equipment should only be considered if single-use equip- ment is not available. \n Discard contaminated sharps immediately and without recapping in puncture- and liquid-proof containers that are closed, sealed and destroyed before completely full. \n Document the quality of the sterilization for all medical equipment used for percuta- neous procedures. \n Wash hands with soap and water before and after procedures; use protective barriers such as gloves, gowns, aprons, masks and goggles for direct contact with blood and other body fluids. \n Disinfect instruments and other contaminated equipment. \n Handle properly soiled linen with care. Soiled linen should be handled as little as pos- sible. Gloves and leak-proof bags should be used if necessary. Cleaning should occur outside patient areas, using detergent and hot water. \n\n Voluntary HIV testing: A client-initiated HIV test whereby the individual chooses to go to a testing facility\/provider to find out his\/her HIV status. \n\n Window period: The time period between initial infection with HIV and the body\u2019s pro- duction of antibodies, which can be up to three months. During this time, an HIV test for antibodies may be negative, even though the person has the virus and can infect others.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182287,7 +182287,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2893, - "Paragraph": "Family Health International resources available at http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/HIVAIDS\/ index.htm. \\n Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Set- tings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \\n \u2014\u2014, Guidelines for Gender Based Violence in Humanitarian Settings: Focusing on Pre- vention of and Response to Sexual Violence in Emergencies, September 2005, http:\/\/www. humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc\/content\/products\/docs\/tfgender_GBVGuidelines2005.pdf. Joint UN Programme on HIV\/AIDS (UNAIDS), Peer Education Kit for Uniformed Services, 2003. \\n \u2014\u2014, Best Practice Case Studies, http:\/\/www.unaids.org. Reproductive Health Response in Conflict (RHRC) Consortium 2004, HIV\/AIDs Preven- tion and Control: a short course for humanitarian workers, www.rhrc.org \\n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Women, War and Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assessment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, http:\/\/www.womenwarpeace.org. \\n UN Population Fund (UNFPA), Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised version, http:\/\/www.unfpa. org\/upload\/lib_pub_file\/373_filename_clinical-mgt-2005rev1.pdf. \\n WHO resources available at http:\/\/www.who.int\/topics\/hiv_infections\/en\/. \\n \u2014\u2014, Reproductive Health in Refugee Settings: An Inter-Agency Field Manual, http:\/\/www. who.int\/reproductive-health\/publications\/interagency_manual_on_RH_in_refugee_ situations\/full_text.pdf.", + "Paragraph": "Family Health International resources available at http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/HIVAIDS\/ index.htm. \n Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Set- tings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \n \u2014\u2014, Guidelines for Gender Based Violence in Humanitarian Settings: Focusing on Pre- vention of and Response to Sexual Violence in Emergencies, September 2005, http:\/\/www. humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc\/content\/products\/docs\/tfgender_GBVGuidelines2005.pdf. Joint UN Programme on HIV\/AIDS (UNAIDS), Peer Education Kit for Uniformed Services, 2003. \n \u2014\u2014, Best Practice Case Studies, http:\/\/www.unaids.org. Reproductive Health Response in Conflict (RHRC) Consortium 2004, HIV\/AIDs Preven- tion and Control: a short course for humanitarian workers, www.rhrc.org \n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Women, War and Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assessment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, http:\/\/www.womenwarpeace.org. \n UN Population Fund (UNFPA), Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised version, http:\/\/www.unfpa. org\/upload\/lib_pub_file\/373_filename_clinical-mgt-2005rev1.pdf. \n WHO resources available at http:\/\/www.who.int\/topics\/hiv_infections\/en\/. \n \u2014\u2014, Reproductive Health in Refugee Settings: An Inter-Agency Field Manual, http:\/\/www. who.int\/reproductive-health\/publications\/interagency_manual_on_RH_in_refugee_ situations\/full_text.pdf.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182305,7 +182305,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2893, - "Paragraph": "Family Health International resources available at http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/HIVAIDS\/ index.htm. \\n Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Set- tings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \\n \u2014\u2014, Guidelines for Gender Based Violence in Humanitarian Settings: Focusing on Pre- vention of and Response to Sexual Violence in Emergencies, September 2005, http:\/\/www. humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc\/content\/products\/docs\/tfgender_GBVGuidelines2005.pdf. Joint UN Programme on HIV\/AIDS (UNAIDS), Peer Education Kit for Uniformed Services, 2003. \\n \u2014\u2014, Best Practice Case Studies, http:\/\/www.unaids.org. Reproductive Health Response in Conflict (RHRC) Consortium 2004, HIV\/AIDs Preven- tion and Control: a short course for humanitarian workers, www.rhrc.org \\n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Women, War and Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assessment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, http:\/\/www.womenwarpeace.org. \\n UN Population Fund (UNFPA), Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised version, http:\/\/www.unfpa. org\/upload\/lib_pub_file\/373_filename_clinical-mgt-2005rev1.pdf. \\n WHO resources available at http:\/\/www.who.int\/topics\/hiv_infections\/en\/. \\n \u2014\u2014, Reproductive Health in Refugee Settings: An Inter-Agency Field Manual, http:\/\/www. who.int\/reproductive-health\/publications\/interagency_manual_on_RH_in_refugee_ situations\/full_text.pdf.", + "Paragraph": "Family Health International resources available at http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/HIVAIDS\/ index.htm. \n Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Set- tings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \n \u2014\u2014, Guidelines for Gender Based Violence in Humanitarian Settings: Focusing on Pre- vention of and Response to Sexual Violence in Emergencies, September 2005, http:\/\/www. humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc\/content\/products\/docs\/tfgender_GBVGuidelines2005.pdf. Joint UN Programme on HIV\/AIDS (UNAIDS), Peer Education Kit for Uniformed Services, 2003. \n \u2014\u2014, Best Practice Case Studies, http:\/\/www.unaids.org. Reproductive Health Response in Conflict (RHRC) Consortium 2004, HIV\/AIDs Preven- tion and Control: a short course for humanitarian workers, www.rhrc.org \n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Women, War and Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assessment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, http:\/\/www.womenwarpeace.org. \n UN Population Fund (UNFPA), Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised version, http:\/\/www.unfpa. org\/upload\/lib_pub_file\/373_filename_clinical-mgt-2005rev1.pdf. \n WHO resources available at http:\/\/www.who.int\/topics\/hiv_infections\/en\/. \n \u2014\u2014, Reproductive Health in Refugee Settings: An Inter-Agency Field Manual, http:\/\/www. who.int\/reproductive-health\/publications\/interagency_manual_on_RH_in_refugee_ situations\/full_text.pdf.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182316,14 +182316,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Set- tings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc.", + "Sentence": "\n Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Set- tings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc.", "newParagraph": "family health international resource available httpwwwfhiorgenhivaids indexhtm n interagency standing committee guideline hivaids intervention emergency set ting httpwwwhumanitarianinfoorgiasc n guideline gender based violence humanitarian setting focusing pre vention response sexual violence emergency september 2005 httpwww humanitarianinfoorgiasccontentproductsdocstfgendergbvguidelines2005pdf joint un programme hivaids unaids peer education kit uniformed service 2003 n best practice case study httpwwwunaidsorg reproductive health response conflict rhrc consortium 2004 hivaids preven tion control short course humanitarian worker wwwrhrcorg n rehn elisabeth ellen johnson sirleaf woman war peace independent expert assessment impact armed conflict woman woman role peacebuilding httpwwwwomenwarpeaceorg n un population fund unfpa clinical management rape survivor developing protocol use refugee internally displaced person revised version httpwwwunfpa orguploadlibpubfile373filenameclinicalmgt2005rev1pdf n resource available httpwwwwhointtopicshivinfectionsen n reproductive health refugee setting interagency field manual httpwww whointreproductivehealthpublicationsinteragencymanualonrhinrefugee situationsfulltextpdf", "ProcessedSent": "n interagency standing committee guideline hivaids intervention emergency set ting httpwwwhumanitarianinfoorgiasc", "SentID": 10128 }, { "ParagraphID": 2893, - "Paragraph": "Family Health International resources available at http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/HIVAIDS\/ index.htm. \\n Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Set- tings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \\n \u2014\u2014, Guidelines for Gender Based Violence in Humanitarian Settings: Focusing on Pre- vention of and Response to Sexual Violence in Emergencies, September 2005, http:\/\/www. humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc\/content\/products\/docs\/tfgender_GBVGuidelines2005.pdf. Joint UN Programme on HIV\/AIDS (UNAIDS), Peer Education Kit for Uniformed Services, 2003. \\n \u2014\u2014, Best Practice Case Studies, http:\/\/www.unaids.org. Reproductive Health Response in Conflict (RHRC) Consortium 2004, HIV\/AIDs Preven- tion and Control: a short course for humanitarian workers, www.rhrc.org \\n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Women, War and Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assessment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, http:\/\/www.womenwarpeace.org. \\n UN Population Fund (UNFPA), Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised version, http:\/\/www.unfpa. org\/upload\/lib_pub_file\/373_filename_clinical-mgt-2005rev1.pdf. \\n WHO resources available at http:\/\/www.who.int\/topics\/hiv_infections\/en\/. \\n \u2014\u2014, Reproductive Health in Refugee Settings: An Inter-Agency Field Manual, http:\/\/www. who.int\/reproductive-health\/publications\/interagency_manual_on_RH_in_refugee_ situations\/full_text.pdf.", + "Paragraph": "Family Health International resources available at http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/HIVAIDS\/ index.htm. \n Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Set- tings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \n \u2014\u2014, Guidelines for Gender Based Violence in Humanitarian Settings: Focusing on Pre- vention of and Response to Sexual Violence in Emergencies, September 2005, http:\/\/www. humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc\/content\/products\/docs\/tfgender_GBVGuidelines2005.pdf. Joint UN Programme on HIV\/AIDS (UNAIDS), Peer Education Kit for Uniformed Services, 2003. \n \u2014\u2014, Best Practice Case Studies, http:\/\/www.unaids.org. Reproductive Health Response in Conflict (RHRC) Consortium 2004, HIV\/AIDs Preven- tion and Control: a short course for humanitarian workers, www.rhrc.org \n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Women, War and Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assessment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, http:\/\/www.womenwarpeace.org. \n UN Population Fund (UNFPA), Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised version, http:\/\/www.unfpa. org\/upload\/lib_pub_file\/373_filename_clinical-mgt-2005rev1.pdf. \n WHO resources available at http:\/\/www.who.int\/topics\/hiv_infections\/en\/. \n \u2014\u2014, Reproductive Health in Refugee Settings: An Inter-Agency Field Manual, http:\/\/www. who.int\/reproductive-health\/publications\/interagency_manual_on_RH_in_refugee_ situations\/full_text.pdf.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182334,14 +182334,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n \u2014\u2014, Guidelines for Gender Based Violence in Humanitarian Settings: Focusing on Pre- vention of and Response to Sexual Violence in Emergencies, September 2005, http:\/\/www.", + "Sentence": "\n \u2014\u2014, Guidelines for Gender Based Violence in Humanitarian Settings: Focusing on Pre- vention of and Response to Sexual Violence in Emergencies, September 2005, http:\/\/www.", "newParagraph": "family health international resource available httpwwwfhiorgenhivaids indexhtm n interagency standing committee guideline hivaids intervention emergency set ting httpwwwhumanitarianinfoorgiasc n guideline gender based violence humanitarian setting focusing pre vention response sexual violence emergency september 2005 httpwww humanitarianinfoorgiasccontentproductsdocstfgendergbvguidelines2005pdf joint un programme hivaids unaids peer education kit uniformed service 2003 n best practice case study httpwwwunaidsorg reproductive health response conflict rhrc consortium 2004 hivaids preven tion control short course humanitarian worker wwwrhrcorg n rehn elisabeth ellen johnson sirleaf woman war peace independent expert assessment impact armed conflict woman woman role peacebuilding httpwwwwomenwarpeaceorg n un population fund unfpa clinical management rape survivor developing protocol use refugee internally displaced person revised version httpwwwunfpa orguploadlibpubfile373filenameclinicalmgt2005rev1pdf n resource available httpwwwwhointtopicshivinfectionsen n reproductive health refugee setting interagency field manual httpwww whointreproductivehealthpublicationsinteragencymanualonrhinrefugee situationsfulltextpdf", "ProcessedSent": "n guideline gender based violence humanitarian setting focusing pre vention response sexual violence emergency september 2005 httpwww", "SentID": 10129 }, { "ParagraphID": 2893, - "Paragraph": "Family Health International resources available at http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/HIVAIDS\/ index.htm. \\n Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Set- tings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \\n \u2014\u2014, Guidelines for Gender Based Violence in Humanitarian Settings: Focusing on Pre- vention of and Response to Sexual Violence in Emergencies, September 2005, http:\/\/www. humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc\/content\/products\/docs\/tfgender_GBVGuidelines2005.pdf. Joint UN Programme on HIV\/AIDS (UNAIDS), Peer Education Kit for Uniformed Services, 2003. \\n \u2014\u2014, Best Practice Case Studies, http:\/\/www.unaids.org. Reproductive Health Response in Conflict (RHRC) Consortium 2004, HIV\/AIDs Preven- tion and Control: a short course for humanitarian workers, www.rhrc.org \\n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Women, War and Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assessment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, http:\/\/www.womenwarpeace.org. \\n UN Population Fund (UNFPA), Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised version, http:\/\/www.unfpa. org\/upload\/lib_pub_file\/373_filename_clinical-mgt-2005rev1.pdf. \\n WHO resources available at http:\/\/www.who.int\/topics\/hiv_infections\/en\/. \\n \u2014\u2014, Reproductive Health in Refugee Settings: An Inter-Agency Field Manual, http:\/\/www. who.int\/reproductive-health\/publications\/interagency_manual_on_RH_in_refugee_ situations\/full_text.pdf.", + "Paragraph": "Family Health International resources available at http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/HIVAIDS\/ index.htm. \n Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Set- tings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \n \u2014\u2014, Guidelines for Gender Based Violence in Humanitarian Settings: Focusing on Pre- vention of and Response to Sexual Violence in Emergencies, September 2005, http:\/\/www. humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc\/content\/products\/docs\/tfgender_GBVGuidelines2005.pdf. Joint UN Programme on HIV\/AIDS (UNAIDS), Peer Education Kit for Uniformed Services, 2003. \n \u2014\u2014, Best Practice Case Studies, http:\/\/www.unaids.org. Reproductive Health Response in Conflict (RHRC) Consortium 2004, HIV\/AIDs Preven- tion and Control: a short course for humanitarian workers, www.rhrc.org \n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Women, War and Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assessment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, http:\/\/www.womenwarpeace.org. \n UN Population Fund (UNFPA), Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised version, http:\/\/www.unfpa. org\/upload\/lib_pub_file\/373_filename_clinical-mgt-2005rev1.pdf. \n WHO resources available at http:\/\/www.who.int\/topics\/hiv_infections\/en\/. \n \u2014\u2014, Reproductive Health in Refugee Settings: An Inter-Agency Field Manual, http:\/\/www. who.int\/reproductive-health\/publications\/interagency_manual_on_RH_in_refugee_ situations\/full_text.pdf.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182359,7 +182359,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2893, - "Paragraph": "Family Health International resources available at http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/HIVAIDS\/ index.htm. \\n Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Set- tings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \\n \u2014\u2014, Guidelines for Gender Based Violence in Humanitarian Settings: Focusing on Pre- vention of and Response to Sexual Violence in Emergencies, September 2005, http:\/\/www. humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc\/content\/products\/docs\/tfgender_GBVGuidelines2005.pdf. Joint UN Programme on HIV\/AIDS (UNAIDS), Peer Education Kit for Uniformed Services, 2003. \\n \u2014\u2014, Best Practice Case Studies, http:\/\/www.unaids.org. Reproductive Health Response in Conflict (RHRC) Consortium 2004, HIV\/AIDs Preven- tion and Control: a short course for humanitarian workers, www.rhrc.org \\n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Women, War and Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assessment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, http:\/\/www.womenwarpeace.org. \\n UN Population Fund (UNFPA), Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised version, http:\/\/www.unfpa. org\/upload\/lib_pub_file\/373_filename_clinical-mgt-2005rev1.pdf. \\n WHO resources available at http:\/\/www.who.int\/topics\/hiv_infections\/en\/. \\n \u2014\u2014, Reproductive Health in Refugee Settings: An Inter-Agency Field Manual, http:\/\/www. who.int\/reproductive-health\/publications\/interagency_manual_on_RH_in_refugee_ situations\/full_text.pdf.", + "Paragraph": "Family Health International resources available at http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/HIVAIDS\/ index.htm. \n Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Set- tings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \n \u2014\u2014, Guidelines for Gender Based Violence in Humanitarian Settings: Focusing on Pre- vention of and Response to Sexual Violence in Emergencies, September 2005, http:\/\/www. humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc\/content\/products\/docs\/tfgender_GBVGuidelines2005.pdf. Joint UN Programme on HIV\/AIDS (UNAIDS), Peer Education Kit for Uniformed Services, 2003. \n \u2014\u2014, Best Practice Case Studies, http:\/\/www.unaids.org. Reproductive Health Response in Conflict (RHRC) Consortium 2004, HIV\/AIDs Preven- tion and Control: a short course for humanitarian workers, www.rhrc.org \n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Women, War and Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assessment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, http:\/\/www.womenwarpeace.org. \n UN Population Fund (UNFPA), Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised version, http:\/\/www.unfpa. org\/upload\/lib_pub_file\/373_filename_clinical-mgt-2005rev1.pdf. \n WHO resources available at http:\/\/www.who.int\/topics\/hiv_infections\/en\/. \n \u2014\u2014, Reproductive Health in Refugee Settings: An Inter-Agency Field Manual, http:\/\/www. who.int\/reproductive-health\/publications\/interagency_manual_on_RH_in_refugee_ situations\/full_text.pdf.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182377,7 +182377,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2893, - "Paragraph": "Family Health International resources available at http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/HIVAIDS\/ index.htm. \\n Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Set- tings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \\n \u2014\u2014, Guidelines for Gender Based Violence in Humanitarian Settings: Focusing on Pre- vention of and Response to Sexual Violence in Emergencies, September 2005, http:\/\/www. humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc\/content\/products\/docs\/tfgender_GBVGuidelines2005.pdf. Joint UN Programme on HIV\/AIDS (UNAIDS), Peer Education Kit for Uniformed Services, 2003. \\n \u2014\u2014, Best Practice Case Studies, http:\/\/www.unaids.org. Reproductive Health Response in Conflict (RHRC) Consortium 2004, HIV\/AIDs Preven- tion and Control: a short course for humanitarian workers, www.rhrc.org \\n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Women, War and Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assessment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, http:\/\/www.womenwarpeace.org. \\n UN Population Fund (UNFPA), Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised version, http:\/\/www.unfpa. org\/upload\/lib_pub_file\/373_filename_clinical-mgt-2005rev1.pdf. \\n WHO resources available at http:\/\/www.who.int\/topics\/hiv_infections\/en\/. \\n \u2014\u2014, Reproductive Health in Refugee Settings: An Inter-Agency Field Manual, http:\/\/www. who.int\/reproductive-health\/publications\/interagency_manual_on_RH_in_refugee_ situations\/full_text.pdf.", + "Paragraph": "Family Health International resources available at http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/HIVAIDS\/ index.htm. \n Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Set- tings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \n \u2014\u2014, Guidelines for Gender Based Violence in Humanitarian Settings: Focusing on Pre- vention of and Response to Sexual Violence in Emergencies, September 2005, http:\/\/www. humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc\/content\/products\/docs\/tfgender_GBVGuidelines2005.pdf. Joint UN Programme on HIV\/AIDS (UNAIDS), Peer Education Kit for Uniformed Services, 2003. \n \u2014\u2014, Best Practice Case Studies, http:\/\/www.unaids.org. Reproductive Health Response in Conflict (RHRC) Consortium 2004, HIV\/AIDs Preven- tion and Control: a short course for humanitarian workers, www.rhrc.org \n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Women, War and Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assessment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, http:\/\/www.womenwarpeace.org. \n UN Population Fund (UNFPA), Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised version, http:\/\/www.unfpa. org\/upload\/lib_pub_file\/373_filename_clinical-mgt-2005rev1.pdf. \n WHO resources available at http:\/\/www.who.int\/topics\/hiv_infections\/en\/. \n \u2014\u2014, Reproductive Health in Refugee Settings: An Inter-Agency Field Manual, http:\/\/www. who.int\/reproductive-health\/publications\/interagency_manual_on_RH_in_refugee_ situations\/full_text.pdf.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182388,14 +182388,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n \u2014\u2014, Best Practice Case Studies, http:\/\/www.unaids.org.", + "Sentence": "\n \u2014\u2014, Best Practice Case Studies, http:\/\/www.unaids.org.", "newParagraph": "family health international resource available httpwwwfhiorgenhivaids indexhtm n interagency standing committee guideline hivaids intervention emergency set ting httpwwwhumanitarianinfoorgiasc n guideline gender based violence humanitarian setting focusing pre vention response sexual violence emergency september 2005 httpwww humanitarianinfoorgiasccontentproductsdocstfgendergbvguidelines2005pdf joint un programme hivaids unaids peer education kit uniformed service 2003 n best practice case study httpwwwunaidsorg reproductive health response conflict rhrc consortium 2004 hivaids preven tion control short course humanitarian worker wwwrhrcorg n rehn elisabeth ellen johnson sirleaf woman war peace independent expert assessment impact armed conflict woman woman role peacebuilding httpwwwwomenwarpeaceorg n un population fund unfpa clinical management rape survivor developing protocol use refugee internally displaced person revised version httpwwwunfpa orguploadlibpubfile373filenameclinicalmgt2005rev1pdf n resource available httpwwwwhointtopicshivinfectionsen n reproductive health refugee setting interagency field manual httpwww whointreproductivehealthpublicationsinteragencymanualonrhinrefugee situationsfulltextpdf", "ProcessedSent": "n best practice case study httpwwwunaidsorg", "SentID": 10132 }, { "ParagraphID": 2893, - "Paragraph": "Family Health International resources available at http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/HIVAIDS\/ index.htm. \\n Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Set- tings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \\n \u2014\u2014, Guidelines for Gender Based Violence in Humanitarian Settings: Focusing on Pre- vention of and Response to Sexual Violence in Emergencies, September 2005, http:\/\/www. humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc\/content\/products\/docs\/tfgender_GBVGuidelines2005.pdf. Joint UN Programme on HIV\/AIDS (UNAIDS), Peer Education Kit for Uniformed Services, 2003. \\n \u2014\u2014, Best Practice Case Studies, http:\/\/www.unaids.org. Reproductive Health Response in Conflict (RHRC) Consortium 2004, HIV\/AIDs Preven- tion and Control: a short course for humanitarian workers, www.rhrc.org \\n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Women, War and Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assessment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, http:\/\/www.womenwarpeace.org. \\n UN Population Fund (UNFPA), Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised version, http:\/\/www.unfpa. org\/upload\/lib_pub_file\/373_filename_clinical-mgt-2005rev1.pdf. \\n WHO resources available at http:\/\/www.who.int\/topics\/hiv_infections\/en\/. \\n \u2014\u2014, Reproductive Health in Refugee Settings: An Inter-Agency Field Manual, http:\/\/www. who.int\/reproductive-health\/publications\/interagency_manual_on_RH_in_refugee_ situations\/full_text.pdf.", + "Paragraph": "Family Health International resources available at http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/HIVAIDS\/ index.htm. \n Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Set- tings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \n \u2014\u2014, Guidelines for Gender Based Violence in Humanitarian Settings: Focusing on Pre- vention of and Response to Sexual Violence in Emergencies, September 2005, http:\/\/www. humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc\/content\/products\/docs\/tfgender_GBVGuidelines2005.pdf. Joint UN Programme on HIV\/AIDS (UNAIDS), Peer Education Kit for Uniformed Services, 2003. \n \u2014\u2014, Best Practice Case Studies, http:\/\/www.unaids.org. Reproductive Health Response in Conflict (RHRC) Consortium 2004, HIV\/AIDs Preven- tion and Control: a short course for humanitarian workers, www.rhrc.org \n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Women, War and Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assessment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, http:\/\/www.womenwarpeace.org. \n UN Population Fund (UNFPA), Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised version, http:\/\/www.unfpa. org\/upload\/lib_pub_file\/373_filename_clinical-mgt-2005rev1.pdf. \n WHO resources available at http:\/\/www.who.int\/topics\/hiv_infections\/en\/. \n \u2014\u2014, Reproductive Health in Refugee Settings: An Inter-Agency Field Manual, http:\/\/www. who.int\/reproductive-health\/publications\/interagency_manual_on_RH_in_refugee_ situations\/full_text.pdf.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182406,14 +182406,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Reproductive Health Response in Conflict (RHRC) Consortium 2004, HIV\/AIDs Preven- tion and Control: a short course for humanitarian workers, www.rhrc.org \\n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Women, War and Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assessment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, http:\/\/www.womenwarpeace.org.", + "Sentence": "Reproductive Health Response in Conflict (RHRC) Consortium 2004, HIV\/AIDs Preven- tion and Control: a short course for humanitarian workers, www.rhrc.org \n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Women, War and Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assessment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, http:\/\/www.womenwarpeace.org.", "newParagraph": "family health international resource available httpwwwfhiorgenhivaids indexhtm n interagency standing committee guideline hivaids intervention emergency set ting httpwwwhumanitarianinfoorgiasc n guideline gender based violence humanitarian setting focusing pre vention response sexual violence emergency september 2005 httpwww humanitarianinfoorgiasccontentproductsdocstfgendergbvguidelines2005pdf joint un programme hivaids unaids peer education kit uniformed service 2003 n best practice case study httpwwwunaidsorg reproductive health response conflict rhrc consortium 2004 hivaids preven tion control short course humanitarian worker wwwrhrcorg n rehn elisabeth ellen johnson sirleaf woman war peace independent expert assessment impact armed conflict woman woman role peacebuilding httpwwwwomenwarpeaceorg n un population fund unfpa clinical management rape survivor developing protocol use refugee internally displaced person revised version httpwwwunfpa orguploadlibpubfile373filenameclinicalmgt2005rev1pdf n resource available httpwwwwhointtopicshivinfectionsen n reproductive health refugee setting interagency field manual httpwww whointreproductivehealthpublicationsinteragencymanualonrhinrefugee situationsfulltextpdf", "ProcessedSent": "reproductive health response conflict rhrc consortium 2004 hivaids preven tion control short course humanitarian worker wwwrhrcorg n rehn elisabeth ellen johnson sirleaf woman war peace independent expert assessment impact armed conflict woman woman role peacebuilding httpwwwwomenwarpeaceorg", "SentID": 10133 }, { "ParagraphID": 2893, - "Paragraph": "Family Health International resources available at http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/HIVAIDS\/ index.htm. \\n Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Set- tings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \\n \u2014\u2014, Guidelines for Gender Based Violence in Humanitarian Settings: Focusing on Pre- vention of and Response to Sexual Violence in Emergencies, September 2005, http:\/\/www. humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc\/content\/products\/docs\/tfgender_GBVGuidelines2005.pdf. Joint UN Programme on HIV\/AIDS (UNAIDS), Peer Education Kit for Uniformed Services, 2003. \\n \u2014\u2014, Best Practice Case Studies, http:\/\/www.unaids.org. Reproductive Health Response in Conflict (RHRC) Consortium 2004, HIV\/AIDs Preven- tion and Control: a short course for humanitarian workers, www.rhrc.org \\n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Women, War and Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assessment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, http:\/\/www.womenwarpeace.org. \\n UN Population Fund (UNFPA), Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised version, http:\/\/www.unfpa. org\/upload\/lib_pub_file\/373_filename_clinical-mgt-2005rev1.pdf. \\n WHO resources available at http:\/\/www.who.int\/topics\/hiv_infections\/en\/. \\n \u2014\u2014, Reproductive Health in Refugee Settings: An Inter-Agency Field Manual, http:\/\/www. who.int\/reproductive-health\/publications\/interagency_manual_on_RH_in_refugee_ situations\/full_text.pdf.", + "Paragraph": "Family Health International resources available at http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/HIVAIDS\/ index.htm. \n Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Set- tings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \n \u2014\u2014, Guidelines for Gender Based Violence in Humanitarian Settings: Focusing on Pre- vention of and Response to Sexual Violence in Emergencies, September 2005, http:\/\/www. humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc\/content\/products\/docs\/tfgender_GBVGuidelines2005.pdf. Joint UN Programme on HIV\/AIDS (UNAIDS), Peer Education Kit for Uniformed Services, 2003. \n \u2014\u2014, Best Practice Case Studies, http:\/\/www.unaids.org. Reproductive Health Response in Conflict (RHRC) Consortium 2004, HIV\/AIDs Preven- tion and Control: a short course for humanitarian workers, www.rhrc.org \n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Women, War and Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assessment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, http:\/\/www.womenwarpeace.org. \n UN Population Fund (UNFPA), Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised version, http:\/\/www.unfpa. org\/upload\/lib_pub_file\/373_filename_clinical-mgt-2005rev1.pdf. \n WHO resources available at http:\/\/www.who.int\/topics\/hiv_infections\/en\/. \n \u2014\u2014, Reproductive Health in Refugee Settings: An Inter-Agency Field Manual, http:\/\/www. who.int\/reproductive-health\/publications\/interagency_manual_on_RH_in_refugee_ situations\/full_text.pdf.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182424,14 +182424,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n UN Population Fund (UNFPA), Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised version, http:\/\/www.unfpa.", + "Sentence": "\n UN Population Fund (UNFPA), Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised version, http:\/\/www.unfpa.", "newParagraph": "family health international resource available httpwwwfhiorgenhivaids indexhtm n interagency standing committee guideline hivaids intervention emergency set ting httpwwwhumanitarianinfoorgiasc n guideline gender based violence humanitarian setting focusing pre vention response sexual violence emergency september 2005 httpwww humanitarianinfoorgiasccontentproductsdocstfgendergbvguidelines2005pdf joint un programme hivaids unaids peer education kit uniformed service 2003 n best practice case study httpwwwunaidsorg reproductive health response conflict rhrc consortium 2004 hivaids preven tion control short course humanitarian worker wwwrhrcorg n rehn elisabeth ellen johnson sirleaf woman war peace independent expert assessment impact armed conflict woman woman role peacebuilding httpwwwwomenwarpeaceorg n un population fund unfpa clinical management rape survivor developing protocol use refugee internally displaced person revised version httpwwwunfpa orguploadlibpubfile373filenameclinicalmgt2005rev1pdf n resource available httpwwwwhointtopicshivinfectionsen n reproductive health refugee setting interagency field manual httpwww whointreproductivehealthpublicationsinteragencymanualonrhinrefugee situationsfulltextpdf", "ProcessedSent": "n un population fund unfpa clinical management rape survivor developing protocol use refugee internally displaced person revised version httpwwwunfpa", "SentID": 10134 }, { "ParagraphID": 2893, - "Paragraph": "Family Health International resources available at http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/HIVAIDS\/ index.htm. \\n Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Set- tings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \\n \u2014\u2014, Guidelines for Gender Based Violence in Humanitarian Settings: Focusing on Pre- vention of and Response to Sexual Violence in Emergencies, September 2005, http:\/\/www. humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc\/content\/products\/docs\/tfgender_GBVGuidelines2005.pdf. Joint UN Programme on HIV\/AIDS (UNAIDS), Peer Education Kit for Uniformed Services, 2003. \\n \u2014\u2014, Best Practice Case Studies, http:\/\/www.unaids.org. Reproductive Health Response in Conflict (RHRC) Consortium 2004, HIV\/AIDs Preven- tion and Control: a short course for humanitarian workers, www.rhrc.org \\n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Women, War and Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assessment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, http:\/\/www.womenwarpeace.org. \\n UN Population Fund (UNFPA), Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised version, http:\/\/www.unfpa. org\/upload\/lib_pub_file\/373_filename_clinical-mgt-2005rev1.pdf. \\n WHO resources available at http:\/\/www.who.int\/topics\/hiv_infections\/en\/. \\n \u2014\u2014, Reproductive Health in Refugee Settings: An Inter-Agency Field Manual, http:\/\/www. who.int\/reproductive-health\/publications\/interagency_manual_on_RH_in_refugee_ situations\/full_text.pdf.", + "Paragraph": "Family Health International resources available at http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/HIVAIDS\/ index.htm. \n Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Set- tings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \n \u2014\u2014, Guidelines for Gender Based Violence in Humanitarian Settings: Focusing on Pre- vention of and Response to Sexual Violence in Emergencies, September 2005, http:\/\/www. humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc\/content\/products\/docs\/tfgender_GBVGuidelines2005.pdf. Joint UN Programme on HIV\/AIDS (UNAIDS), Peer Education Kit for Uniformed Services, 2003. \n \u2014\u2014, Best Practice Case Studies, http:\/\/www.unaids.org. Reproductive Health Response in Conflict (RHRC) Consortium 2004, HIV\/AIDs Preven- tion and Control: a short course for humanitarian workers, www.rhrc.org \n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Women, War and Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assessment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, http:\/\/www.womenwarpeace.org. \n UN Population Fund (UNFPA), Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised version, http:\/\/www.unfpa. org\/upload\/lib_pub_file\/373_filename_clinical-mgt-2005rev1.pdf. \n WHO resources available at http:\/\/www.who.int\/topics\/hiv_infections\/en\/. \n \u2014\u2014, Reproductive Health in Refugee Settings: An Inter-Agency Field Manual, http:\/\/www. who.int\/reproductive-health\/publications\/interagency_manual_on_RH_in_refugee_ situations\/full_text.pdf.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182449,7 +182449,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2893, - "Paragraph": "Family Health International resources available at http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/HIVAIDS\/ index.htm. \\n Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Set- tings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \\n \u2014\u2014, Guidelines for Gender Based Violence in Humanitarian Settings: Focusing on Pre- vention of and Response to Sexual Violence in Emergencies, September 2005, http:\/\/www. humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc\/content\/products\/docs\/tfgender_GBVGuidelines2005.pdf. Joint UN Programme on HIV\/AIDS (UNAIDS), Peer Education Kit for Uniformed Services, 2003. \\n \u2014\u2014, Best Practice Case Studies, http:\/\/www.unaids.org. Reproductive Health Response in Conflict (RHRC) Consortium 2004, HIV\/AIDs Preven- tion and Control: a short course for humanitarian workers, www.rhrc.org \\n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Women, War and Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assessment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, http:\/\/www.womenwarpeace.org. \\n UN Population Fund (UNFPA), Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised version, http:\/\/www.unfpa. org\/upload\/lib_pub_file\/373_filename_clinical-mgt-2005rev1.pdf. \\n WHO resources available at http:\/\/www.who.int\/topics\/hiv_infections\/en\/. \\n \u2014\u2014, Reproductive Health in Refugee Settings: An Inter-Agency Field Manual, http:\/\/www. who.int\/reproductive-health\/publications\/interagency_manual_on_RH_in_refugee_ situations\/full_text.pdf.", + "Paragraph": "Family Health International resources available at http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/HIVAIDS\/ index.htm. \n Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Set- tings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \n \u2014\u2014, Guidelines for Gender Based Violence in Humanitarian Settings: Focusing on Pre- vention of and Response to Sexual Violence in Emergencies, September 2005, http:\/\/www. humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc\/content\/products\/docs\/tfgender_GBVGuidelines2005.pdf. Joint UN Programme on HIV\/AIDS (UNAIDS), Peer Education Kit for Uniformed Services, 2003. \n \u2014\u2014, Best Practice Case Studies, http:\/\/www.unaids.org. Reproductive Health Response in Conflict (RHRC) Consortium 2004, HIV\/AIDs Preven- tion and Control: a short course for humanitarian workers, www.rhrc.org \n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Women, War and Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assessment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, http:\/\/www.womenwarpeace.org. \n UN Population Fund (UNFPA), Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised version, http:\/\/www.unfpa. org\/upload\/lib_pub_file\/373_filename_clinical-mgt-2005rev1.pdf. \n WHO resources available at http:\/\/www.who.int\/topics\/hiv_infections\/en\/. \n \u2014\u2014, Reproductive Health in Refugee Settings: An Inter-Agency Field Manual, http:\/\/www. who.int\/reproductive-health\/publications\/interagency_manual_on_RH_in_refugee_ situations\/full_text.pdf.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182460,14 +182460,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n WHO resources available at http:\/\/www.who.int\/topics\/hiv_infections\/en\/.", + "Sentence": "\n WHO resources available at http:\/\/www.who.int\/topics\/hiv_infections\/en\/.", "newParagraph": "family health international resource available httpwwwfhiorgenhivaids indexhtm n interagency standing committee guideline hivaids intervention emergency set ting httpwwwhumanitarianinfoorgiasc n guideline gender based violence humanitarian setting focusing pre vention response sexual violence emergency september 2005 httpwww humanitarianinfoorgiasccontentproductsdocstfgendergbvguidelines2005pdf joint un programme hivaids unaids peer education kit uniformed service 2003 n best practice case study httpwwwunaidsorg reproductive health response conflict rhrc consortium 2004 hivaids preven tion control short course humanitarian worker wwwrhrcorg n rehn elisabeth ellen johnson sirleaf woman war peace independent expert assessment impact armed conflict woman woman role peacebuilding httpwwwwomenwarpeaceorg n un population fund unfpa clinical management rape survivor developing protocol use refugee internally displaced person revised version httpwwwunfpa orguploadlibpubfile373filenameclinicalmgt2005rev1pdf n resource available httpwwwwhointtopicshivinfectionsen n reproductive health refugee setting interagency field manual httpwww whointreproductivehealthpublicationsinteragencymanualonrhinrefugee situationsfulltextpdf", "ProcessedSent": "n resource available httpwwwwhointtopicshivinfectionsen", "SentID": 10136 }, { "ParagraphID": 2893, - "Paragraph": "Family Health International resources available at http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/HIVAIDS\/ index.htm. \\n Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Set- tings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \\n \u2014\u2014, Guidelines for Gender Based Violence in Humanitarian Settings: Focusing on Pre- vention of and Response to Sexual Violence in Emergencies, September 2005, http:\/\/www. humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc\/content\/products\/docs\/tfgender_GBVGuidelines2005.pdf. Joint UN Programme on HIV\/AIDS (UNAIDS), Peer Education Kit for Uniformed Services, 2003. \\n \u2014\u2014, Best Practice Case Studies, http:\/\/www.unaids.org. Reproductive Health Response in Conflict (RHRC) Consortium 2004, HIV\/AIDs Preven- tion and Control: a short course for humanitarian workers, www.rhrc.org \\n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Women, War and Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assessment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, http:\/\/www.womenwarpeace.org. \\n UN Population Fund (UNFPA), Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised version, http:\/\/www.unfpa. org\/upload\/lib_pub_file\/373_filename_clinical-mgt-2005rev1.pdf. \\n WHO resources available at http:\/\/www.who.int\/topics\/hiv_infections\/en\/. \\n \u2014\u2014, Reproductive Health in Refugee Settings: An Inter-Agency Field Manual, http:\/\/www. who.int\/reproductive-health\/publications\/interagency_manual_on_RH_in_refugee_ situations\/full_text.pdf.", + "Paragraph": "Family Health International resources available at http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/HIVAIDS\/ index.htm. \n Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Set- tings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \n \u2014\u2014, Guidelines for Gender Based Violence in Humanitarian Settings: Focusing on Pre- vention of and Response to Sexual Violence in Emergencies, September 2005, http:\/\/www. humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc\/content\/products\/docs\/tfgender_GBVGuidelines2005.pdf. Joint UN Programme on HIV\/AIDS (UNAIDS), Peer Education Kit for Uniformed Services, 2003. \n \u2014\u2014, Best Practice Case Studies, http:\/\/www.unaids.org. Reproductive Health Response in Conflict (RHRC) Consortium 2004, HIV\/AIDs Preven- tion and Control: a short course for humanitarian workers, www.rhrc.org \n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Women, War and Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assessment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, http:\/\/www.womenwarpeace.org. \n UN Population Fund (UNFPA), Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised version, http:\/\/www.unfpa. org\/upload\/lib_pub_file\/373_filename_clinical-mgt-2005rev1.pdf. \n WHO resources available at http:\/\/www.who.int\/topics\/hiv_infections\/en\/. \n \u2014\u2014, Reproductive Health in Refugee Settings: An Inter-Agency Field Manual, http:\/\/www. who.int\/reproductive-health\/publications\/interagency_manual_on_RH_in_refugee_ situations\/full_text.pdf.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182478,14 +182478,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n \u2014\u2014, Reproductive Health in Refugee Settings: An Inter-Agency Field Manual, http:\/\/www.", + "Sentence": "\n \u2014\u2014, Reproductive Health in Refugee Settings: An Inter-Agency Field Manual, http:\/\/www.", "newParagraph": "family health international resource available httpwwwfhiorgenhivaids indexhtm n interagency standing committee guideline hivaids intervention emergency set ting httpwwwhumanitarianinfoorgiasc n guideline gender based violence humanitarian setting focusing pre vention response sexual violence emergency september 2005 httpwww humanitarianinfoorgiasccontentproductsdocstfgendergbvguidelines2005pdf joint un programme hivaids unaids peer education kit uniformed service 2003 n best practice case study httpwwwunaidsorg reproductive health response conflict rhrc consortium 2004 hivaids preven tion control short course humanitarian worker wwwrhrcorg n rehn elisabeth ellen johnson sirleaf woman war peace independent expert assessment impact armed conflict woman woman role peacebuilding httpwwwwomenwarpeaceorg n un population fund unfpa clinical management rape survivor developing protocol use refugee internally displaced person revised version httpwwwunfpa orguploadlibpubfile373filenameclinicalmgt2005rev1pdf n resource available httpwwwwhointtopicshivinfectionsen n reproductive health refugee setting interagency field manual httpwww whointreproductivehealthpublicationsinteragencymanualonrhinrefugee situationsfulltextpdf", "ProcessedSent": "n reproductive health refugee setting interagency field manual httpwww", "SentID": 10137 }, { "ParagraphID": 2893, - "Paragraph": "Family Health International resources available at http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/HIVAIDS\/ index.htm. \\n Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Set- tings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \\n \u2014\u2014, Guidelines for Gender Based Violence in Humanitarian Settings: Focusing on Pre- vention of and Response to Sexual Violence in Emergencies, September 2005, http:\/\/www. humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc\/content\/products\/docs\/tfgender_GBVGuidelines2005.pdf. Joint UN Programme on HIV\/AIDS (UNAIDS), Peer Education Kit for Uniformed Services, 2003. \\n \u2014\u2014, Best Practice Case Studies, http:\/\/www.unaids.org. Reproductive Health Response in Conflict (RHRC) Consortium 2004, HIV\/AIDs Preven- tion and Control: a short course for humanitarian workers, www.rhrc.org \\n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Women, War and Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assessment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, http:\/\/www.womenwarpeace.org. \\n UN Population Fund (UNFPA), Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised version, http:\/\/www.unfpa. org\/upload\/lib_pub_file\/373_filename_clinical-mgt-2005rev1.pdf. \\n WHO resources available at http:\/\/www.who.int\/topics\/hiv_infections\/en\/. \\n \u2014\u2014, Reproductive Health in Refugee Settings: An Inter-Agency Field Manual, http:\/\/www. who.int\/reproductive-health\/publications\/interagency_manual_on_RH_in_refugee_ situations\/full_text.pdf.", + "Paragraph": "Family Health International resources available at http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/HIVAIDS\/ index.htm. \n Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Set- tings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \n \u2014\u2014, Guidelines for Gender Based Violence in Humanitarian Settings: Focusing on Pre- vention of and Response to Sexual Violence in Emergencies, September 2005, http:\/\/www. humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc\/content\/products\/docs\/tfgender_GBVGuidelines2005.pdf. Joint UN Programme on HIV\/AIDS (UNAIDS), Peer Education Kit for Uniformed Services, 2003. \n \u2014\u2014, Best Practice Case Studies, http:\/\/www.unaids.org. Reproductive Health Response in Conflict (RHRC) Consortium 2004, HIV\/AIDs Preven- tion and Control: a short course for humanitarian workers, www.rhrc.org \n Rehn, Elisabeth and Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Women, War and Peace: The Independent Experts\u2019 Assessment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women and Women\u2019s Role in Peace-building, http:\/\/www.womenwarpeace.org. \n UN Population Fund (UNFPA), Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised version, http:\/\/www.unfpa. org\/upload\/lib_pub_file\/373_filename_clinical-mgt-2005rev1.pdf. \n WHO resources available at http:\/\/www.who.int\/topics\/hiv_infections\/en\/. \n \u2014\u2014, Reproductive Health in Refugee Settings: An Inter-Agency Field Manual, http:\/\/www. who.int\/reproductive-health\/publications\/interagency_manual_on_RH_in_refugee_ situations\/full_text.pdf.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182503,7 +182503,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2894, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Bazergan, R., Intervention and Intercourse: HIV\/AIDS and peacekeepers, Conflict, Security and Develop- ment, vol 3 no 1, April 2003, King\u2019s College, London, pp. 27\u201351. \\n 2 http:\/\/www.un.org\/docs\/sc\/. \\n 3 Ibid. \\n 4 Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Settings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \\n 5 HIV risk in militaries is related to specific contexts, with a number of influencing factors, including the context in which troops are deployed. Many AIDS interventions by ministries of defence have been effective, and have reduced HIV infection rates in the uniformed services. \\n 6 In many cases, ex-combatants who are set to join a uniformed service do not go through the DDR process. There would still be a potential benefit, however, in instances where HIV\/AIDS awareness has started in the barracks\/camps. \\n 7 At the same time planners cannot assume that all fighting forces will have an organised structure in barracks with the associated logistical support. In some cases, combatants may be mixed with the population and hard to distinguish from the general population. \\n 8 See http:\/\/www.unaids.org and http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/index.htm.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Bazergan, R., Intervention and Intercourse: HIV\/AIDS and peacekeepers, Conflict, Security and Develop- ment, vol 3 no 1, April 2003, King\u2019s College, London, pp. 27\u201351. \n 2 http:\/\/www.un.org\/docs\/sc\/. \n 3 Ibid. \n 4 Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Settings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \n 5 HIV risk in militaries is related to specific contexts, with a number of influencing factors, including the context in which troops are deployed. Many AIDS interventions by ministries of defence have been effective, and have reduced HIV infection rates in the uniformed services. \n 6 In many cases, ex-combatants who are set to join a uniformed service do not go through the DDR process. There would still be a potential benefit, however, in instances where HIV\/AIDS awareness has started in the barracks\/camps. \n 7 At the same time planners cannot assume that all fighting forces will have an organised structure in barracks with the associated logistical support. In some cases, combatants may be mixed with the population and hard to distinguish from the general population. \n 8 See http:\/\/www.unaids.org and http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/index.htm.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182514,14 +182514,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 1 Bazergan, R., Intervention and Intercourse: HIV\/AIDS and peacekeepers, Conflict, Security and Develop- ment, vol 3 no 1, April 2003, King\u2019s College, London, pp.", + "Sentence": "\n 1 Bazergan, R., Intervention and Intercourse: HIV\/AIDS and peacekeepers, Conflict, Security and Develop- ment, vol 3 no 1, April 2003, King\u2019s College, London, pp.", "newParagraph": "n 1 bazergan r intervention intercourse hivaids peacekeeper conflict security develop ment vol 3 1 april 2003 king college london pp 27 51 n 2 httpwwwunorgdocssc n 3 ibid n 4 interagency standing committee guideline hivaids intervention emergency setting httpwwwhumanitarianinfoorgiasc n 5 hiv risk military related specific context number influencing factor including context troop deployed many aid intervention ministry defence effective reduced hiv infection rate uniformed service n 6 many case excombatants set join uniformed service go ddr process would still potential benefit however instance hivaids awareness started barrackscamps n 7 time planner cannot assume fighting force organised structure barrack associated logistical support case combatant may mixed population hard distinguish general population n 8 see httpwwwunaidsorg httpwwwfhiorgenindexhtm", "ProcessedSent": "n 1 bazergan r intervention intercourse hivaids peacekeeper conflict security develop ment vol 3 1 april 2003 king college london pp", "SentID": 10139 }, { "ParagraphID": 2894, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Bazergan, R., Intervention and Intercourse: HIV\/AIDS and peacekeepers, Conflict, Security and Develop- ment, vol 3 no 1, April 2003, King\u2019s College, London, pp. 27\u201351. \\n 2 http:\/\/www.un.org\/docs\/sc\/. \\n 3 Ibid. \\n 4 Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Settings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \\n 5 HIV risk in militaries is related to specific contexts, with a number of influencing factors, including the context in which troops are deployed. Many AIDS interventions by ministries of defence have been effective, and have reduced HIV infection rates in the uniformed services. \\n 6 In many cases, ex-combatants who are set to join a uniformed service do not go through the DDR process. There would still be a potential benefit, however, in instances where HIV\/AIDS awareness has started in the barracks\/camps. \\n 7 At the same time planners cannot assume that all fighting forces will have an organised structure in barracks with the associated logistical support. In some cases, combatants may be mixed with the population and hard to distinguish from the general population. \\n 8 See http:\/\/www.unaids.org and http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/index.htm.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Bazergan, R., Intervention and Intercourse: HIV\/AIDS and peacekeepers, Conflict, Security and Develop- ment, vol 3 no 1, April 2003, King\u2019s College, London, pp. 27\u201351. \n 2 http:\/\/www.un.org\/docs\/sc\/. \n 3 Ibid. \n 4 Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Settings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \n 5 HIV risk in militaries is related to specific contexts, with a number of influencing factors, including the context in which troops are deployed. Many AIDS interventions by ministries of defence have been effective, and have reduced HIV infection rates in the uniformed services. \n 6 In many cases, ex-combatants who are set to join a uniformed service do not go through the DDR process. There would still be a potential benefit, however, in instances where HIV\/AIDS awareness has started in the barracks\/camps. \n 7 At the same time planners cannot assume that all fighting forces will have an organised structure in barracks with the associated logistical support. In some cases, combatants may be mixed with the population and hard to distinguish from the general population. \n 8 See http:\/\/www.unaids.org and http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/index.htm.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182539,7 +182539,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2894, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Bazergan, R., Intervention and Intercourse: HIV\/AIDS and peacekeepers, Conflict, Security and Develop- ment, vol 3 no 1, April 2003, King\u2019s College, London, pp. 27\u201351. \\n 2 http:\/\/www.un.org\/docs\/sc\/. \\n 3 Ibid. \\n 4 Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Settings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \\n 5 HIV risk in militaries is related to specific contexts, with a number of influencing factors, including the context in which troops are deployed. Many AIDS interventions by ministries of defence have been effective, and have reduced HIV infection rates in the uniformed services. \\n 6 In many cases, ex-combatants who are set to join a uniformed service do not go through the DDR process. There would still be a potential benefit, however, in instances where HIV\/AIDS awareness has started in the barracks\/camps. \\n 7 At the same time planners cannot assume that all fighting forces will have an organised structure in barracks with the associated logistical support. In some cases, combatants may be mixed with the population and hard to distinguish from the general population. \\n 8 See http:\/\/www.unaids.org and http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/index.htm.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Bazergan, R., Intervention and Intercourse: HIV\/AIDS and peacekeepers, Conflict, Security and Develop- ment, vol 3 no 1, April 2003, King\u2019s College, London, pp. 27\u201351. \n 2 http:\/\/www.un.org\/docs\/sc\/. \n 3 Ibid. \n 4 Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Settings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \n 5 HIV risk in militaries is related to specific contexts, with a number of influencing factors, including the context in which troops are deployed. Many AIDS interventions by ministries of defence have been effective, and have reduced HIV infection rates in the uniformed services. \n 6 In many cases, ex-combatants who are set to join a uniformed service do not go through the DDR process. There would still be a potential benefit, however, in instances where HIV\/AIDS awareness has started in the barracks\/camps. \n 7 At the same time planners cannot assume that all fighting forces will have an organised structure in barracks with the associated logistical support. In some cases, combatants may be mixed with the population and hard to distinguish from the general population. \n 8 See http:\/\/www.unaids.org and http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/index.htm.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182550,14 +182550,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 2 http:\/\/www.un.org\/docs\/sc\/.", + "Sentence": "\n 2 http:\/\/www.un.org\/docs\/sc\/.", "newParagraph": "n 1 bazergan r intervention intercourse hivaids peacekeeper conflict security develop ment vol 3 1 april 2003 king college london pp 27 51 n 2 httpwwwunorgdocssc n 3 ibid n 4 interagency standing committee guideline hivaids intervention emergency setting httpwwwhumanitarianinfoorgiasc n 5 hiv risk military related specific context number influencing factor including context troop deployed many aid intervention ministry defence effective reduced hiv infection rate uniformed service n 6 many case excombatants set join uniformed service go ddr process would still potential benefit however instance hivaids awareness started barrackscamps n 7 time planner cannot assume fighting force organised structure barrack associated logistical support case combatant may mixed population hard distinguish general population n 8 see httpwwwunaidsorg httpwwwfhiorgenindexhtm", "ProcessedSent": "n 2 httpwwwunorgdocssc", "SentID": 10141 }, { "ParagraphID": 2894, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Bazergan, R., Intervention and Intercourse: HIV\/AIDS and peacekeepers, Conflict, Security and Develop- ment, vol 3 no 1, April 2003, King\u2019s College, London, pp. 27\u201351. \\n 2 http:\/\/www.un.org\/docs\/sc\/. \\n 3 Ibid. \\n 4 Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Settings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \\n 5 HIV risk in militaries is related to specific contexts, with a number of influencing factors, including the context in which troops are deployed. Many AIDS interventions by ministries of defence have been effective, and have reduced HIV infection rates in the uniformed services. \\n 6 In many cases, ex-combatants who are set to join a uniformed service do not go through the DDR process. There would still be a potential benefit, however, in instances where HIV\/AIDS awareness has started in the barracks\/camps. \\n 7 At the same time planners cannot assume that all fighting forces will have an organised structure in barracks with the associated logistical support. In some cases, combatants may be mixed with the population and hard to distinguish from the general population. \\n 8 See http:\/\/www.unaids.org and http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/index.htm.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Bazergan, R., Intervention and Intercourse: HIV\/AIDS and peacekeepers, Conflict, Security and Develop- ment, vol 3 no 1, April 2003, King\u2019s College, London, pp. 27\u201351. \n 2 http:\/\/www.un.org\/docs\/sc\/. \n 3 Ibid. \n 4 Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Settings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \n 5 HIV risk in militaries is related to specific contexts, with a number of influencing factors, including the context in which troops are deployed. Many AIDS interventions by ministries of defence have been effective, and have reduced HIV infection rates in the uniformed services. \n 6 In many cases, ex-combatants who are set to join a uniformed service do not go through the DDR process. There would still be a potential benefit, however, in instances where HIV\/AIDS awareness has started in the barracks\/camps. \n 7 At the same time planners cannot assume that all fighting forces will have an organised structure in barracks with the associated logistical support. In some cases, combatants may be mixed with the population and hard to distinguish from the general population. \n 8 See http:\/\/www.unaids.org and http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/index.htm.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182568,14 +182568,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 3 Ibid.", + "Sentence": "\n 3 Ibid.", "newParagraph": "n 1 bazergan r intervention intercourse hivaids peacekeeper conflict security develop ment vol 3 1 april 2003 king college london pp 27 51 n 2 httpwwwunorgdocssc n 3 ibid n 4 interagency standing committee guideline hivaids intervention emergency setting httpwwwhumanitarianinfoorgiasc n 5 hiv risk military related specific context number influencing factor including context troop deployed many aid intervention ministry defence effective reduced hiv infection rate uniformed service n 6 many case excombatants set join uniformed service go ddr process would still potential benefit however instance hivaids awareness started barrackscamps n 7 time planner cannot assume fighting force organised structure barrack associated logistical support case combatant may mixed population hard distinguish general population n 8 see httpwwwunaidsorg httpwwwfhiorgenindexhtm", "ProcessedSent": "n 3 ibid", "SentID": 10142 }, { "ParagraphID": 2894, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Bazergan, R., Intervention and Intercourse: HIV\/AIDS and peacekeepers, Conflict, Security and Develop- ment, vol 3 no 1, April 2003, King\u2019s College, London, pp. 27\u201351. \\n 2 http:\/\/www.un.org\/docs\/sc\/. \\n 3 Ibid. \\n 4 Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Settings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \\n 5 HIV risk in militaries is related to specific contexts, with a number of influencing factors, including the context in which troops are deployed. Many AIDS interventions by ministries of defence have been effective, and have reduced HIV infection rates in the uniformed services. \\n 6 In many cases, ex-combatants who are set to join a uniformed service do not go through the DDR process. There would still be a potential benefit, however, in instances where HIV\/AIDS awareness has started in the barracks\/camps. \\n 7 At the same time planners cannot assume that all fighting forces will have an organised structure in barracks with the associated logistical support. In some cases, combatants may be mixed with the population and hard to distinguish from the general population. \\n 8 See http:\/\/www.unaids.org and http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/index.htm.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Bazergan, R., Intervention and Intercourse: HIV\/AIDS and peacekeepers, Conflict, Security and Develop- ment, vol 3 no 1, April 2003, King\u2019s College, London, pp. 27\u201351. \n 2 http:\/\/www.un.org\/docs\/sc\/. \n 3 Ibid. \n 4 Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Settings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \n 5 HIV risk in militaries is related to specific contexts, with a number of influencing factors, including the context in which troops are deployed. Many AIDS interventions by ministries of defence have been effective, and have reduced HIV infection rates in the uniformed services. \n 6 In many cases, ex-combatants who are set to join a uniformed service do not go through the DDR process. There would still be a potential benefit, however, in instances where HIV\/AIDS awareness has started in the barracks\/camps. \n 7 At the same time planners cannot assume that all fighting forces will have an organised structure in barracks with the associated logistical support. In some cases, combatants may be mixed with the population and hard to distinguish from the general population. \n 8 See http:\/\/www.unaids.org and http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/index.htm.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182586,14 +182586,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 4 Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Settings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc.", + "Sentence": "\n 4 Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Settings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc.", "newParagraph": "n 1 bazergan r intervention intercourse hivaids peacekeeper conflict security develop ment vol 3 1 april 2003 king college london pp 27 51 n 2 httpwwwunorgdocssc n 3 ibid n 4 interagency standing committee guideline hivaids intervention emergency setting httpwwwhumanitarianinfoorgiasc n 5 hiv risk military related specific context number influencing factor including context troop deployed many aid intervention ministry defence effective reduced hiv infection rate uniformed service n 6 many case excombatants set join uniformed service go ddr process would still potential benefit however instance hivaids awareness started barrackscamps n 7 time planner cannot assume fighting force organised structure barrack associated logistical support case combatant may mixed population hard distinguish general population n 8 see httpwwwunaidsorg httpwwwfhiorgenindexhtm", "ProcessedSent": "n 4 interagency standing committee guideline hivaids intervention emergency setting httpwwwhumanitarianinfoorgiasc", "SentID": 10143 }, { "ParagraphID": 2894, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Bazergan, R., Intervention and Intercourse: HIV\/AIDS and peacekeepers, Conflict, Security and Develop- ment, vol 3 no 1, April 2003, King\u2019s College, London, pp. 27\u201351. \\n 2 http:\/\/www.un.org\/docs\/sc\/. \\n 3 Ibid. \\n 4 Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Settings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \\n 5 HIV risk in militaries is related to specific contexts, with a number of influencing factors, including the context in which troops are deployed. Many AIDS interventions by ministries of defence have been effective, and have reduced HIV infection rates in the uniformed services. \\n 6 In many cases, ex-combatants who are set to join a uniformed service do not go through the DDR process. There would still be a potential benefit, however, in instances where HIV\/AIDS awareness has started in the barracks\/camps. \\n 7 At the same time planners cannot assume that all fighting forces will have an organised structure in barracks with the associated logistical support. In some cases, combatants may be mixed with the population and hard to distinguish from the general population. \\n 8 See http:\/\/www.unaids.org and http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/index.htm.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Bazergan, R., Intervention and Intercourse: HIV\/AIDS and peacekeepers, Conflict, Security and Develop- ment, vol 3 no 1, April 2003, King\u2019s College, London, pp. 27\u201351. \n 2 http:\/\/www.un.org\/docs\/sc\/. \n 3 Ibid. \n 4 Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Settings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \n 5 HIV risk in militaries is related to specific contexts, with a number of influencing factors, including the context in which troops are deployed. Many AIDS interventions by ministries of defence have been effective, and have reduced HIV infection rates in the uniformed services. \n 6 In many cases, ex-combatants who are set to join a uniformed service do not go through the DDR process. There would still be a potential benefit, however, in instances where HIV\/AIDS awareness has started in the barracks\/camps. \n 7 At the same time planners cannot assume that all fighting forces will have an organised structure in barracks with the associated logistical support. In some cases, combatants may be mixed with the population and hard to distinguish from the general population. \n 8 See http:\/\/www.unaids.org and http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/index.htm.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182604,14 +182604,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 5 HIV risk in militaries is related to specific contexts, with a number of influencing factors, including the context in which troops are deployed.", + "Sentence": "\n 5 HIV risk in militaries is related to specific contexts, with a number of influencing factors, including the context in which troops are deployed.", "newParagraph": "n 1 bazergan r intervention intercourse hivaids peacekeeper conflict security develop ment vol 3 1 april 2003 king college london pp 27 51 n 2 httpwwwunorgdocssc n 3 ibid n 4 interagency standing committee guideline hivaids intervention emergency setting httpwwwhumanitarianinfoorgiasc n 5 hiv risk military related specific context number influencing factor including context troop deployed many aid intervention ministry defence effective reduced hiv infection rate uniformed service n 6 many case excombatants set join uniformed service go ddr process would still potential benefit however instance hivaids awareness started barrackscamps n 7 time planner cannot assume fighting force organised structure barrack associated logistical support case combatant may mixed population hard distinguish general population n 8 see httpwwwunaidsorg httpwwwfhiorgenindexhtm", "ProcessedSent": "n 5 hiv risk military related specific context number influencing factor including context troop deployed", "SentID": 10144 }, { "ParagraphID": 2894, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Bazergan, R., Intervention and Intercourse: HIV\/AIDS and peacekeepers, Conflict, Security and Develop- ment, vol 3 no 1, April 2003, King\u2019s College, London, pp. 27\u201351. \\n 2 http:\/\/www.un.org\/docs\/sc\/. \\n 3 Ibid. \\n 4 Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Settings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \\n 5 HIV risk in militaries is related to specific contexts, with a number of influencing factors, including the context in which troops are deployed. Many AIDS interventions by ministries of defence have been effective, and have reduced HIV infection rates in the uniformed services. \\n 6 In many cases, ex-combatants who are set to join a uniformed service do not go through the DDR process. There would still be a potential benefit, however, in instances where HIV\/AIDS awareness has started in the barracks\/camps. \\n 7 At the same time planners cannot assume that all fighting forces will have an organised structure in barracks with the associated logistical support. In some cases, combatants may be mixed with the population and hard to distinguish from the general population. \\n 8 See http:\/\/www.unaids.org and http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/index.htm.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Bazergan, R., Intervention and Intercourse: HIV\/AIDS and peacekeepers, Conflict, Security and Develop- ment, vol 3 no 1, April 2003, King\u2019s College, London, pp. 27\u201351. \n 2 http:\/\/www.un.org\/docs\/sc\/. \n 3 Ibid. \n 4 Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Settings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \n 5 HIV risk in militaries is related to specific contexts, with a number of influencing factors, including the context in which troops are deployed. Many AIDS interventions by ministries of defence have been effective, and have reduced HIV infection rates in the uniformed services. \n 6 In many cases, ex-combatants who are set to join a uniformed service do not go through the DDR process. There would still be a potential benefit, however, in instances where HIV\/AIDS awareness has started in the barracks\/camps. \n 7 At the same time planners cannot assume that all fighting forces will have an organised structure in barracks with the associated logistical support. In some cases, combatants may be mixed with the population and hard to distinguish from the general population. \n 8 See http:\/\/www.unaids.org and http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/index.htm.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182629,7 +182629,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2894, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Bazergan, R., Intervention and Intercourse: HIV\/AIDS and peacekeepers, Conflict, Security and Develop- ment, vol 3 no 1, April 2003, King\u2019s College, London, pp. 27\u201351. \\n 2 http:\/\/www.un.org\/docs\/sc\/. \\n 3 Ibid. \\n 4 Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Settings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \\n 5 HIV risk in militaries is related to specific contexts, with a number of influencing factors, including the context in which troops are deployed. Many AIDS interventions by ministries of defence have been effective, and have reduced HIV infection rates in the uniformed services. \\n 6 In many cases, ex-combatants who are set to join a uniformed service do not go through the DDR process. There would still be a potential benefit, however, in instances where HIV\/AIDS awareness has started in the barracks\/camps. \\n 7 At the same time planners cannot assume that all fighting forces will have an organised structure in barracks with the associated logistical support. In some cases, combatants may be mixed with the population and hard to distinguish from the general population. \\n 8 See http:\/\/www.unaids.org and http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/index.htm.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Bazergan, R., Intervention and Intercourse: HIV\/AIDS and peacekeepers, Conflict, Security and Develop- ment, vol 3 no 1, April 2003, King\u2019s College, London, pp. 27\u201351. \n 2 http:\/\/www.un.org\/docs\/sc\/. \n 3 Ibid. \n 4 Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Settings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \n 5 HIV risk in militaries is related to specific contexts, with a number of influencing factors, including the context in which troops are deployed. Many AIDS interventions by ministries of defence have been effective, and have reduced HIV infection rates in the uniformed services. \n 6 In many cases, ex-combatants who are set to join a uniformed service do not go through the DDR process. There would still be a potential benefit, however, in instances where HIV\/AIDS awareness has started in the barracks\/camps. \n 7 At the same time planners cannot assume that all fighting forces will have an organised structure in barracks with the associated logistical support. In some cases, combatants may be mixed with the population and hard to distinguish from the general population. \n 8 See http:\/\/www.unaids.org and http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/index.htm.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182640,14 +182640,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 6 In many cases, ex-combatants who are set to join a uniformed service do not go through the DDR process.", + "Sentence": "\n 6 In many cases, ex-combatants who are set to join a uniformed service do not go through the DDR process.", "newParagraph": "n 1 bazergan r intervention intercourse hivaids peacekeeper conflict security develop ment vol 3 1 april 2003 king college london pp 27 51 n 2 httpwwwunorgdocssc n 3 ibid n 4 interagency standing committee guideline hivaids intervention emergency setting httpwwwhumanitarianinfoorgiasc n 5 hiv risk military related specific context number influencing factor including context troop deployed many aid intervention ministry defence effective reduced hiv infection rate uniformed service n 6 many case excombatants set join uniformed service go ddr process would still potential benefit however instance hivaids awareness started barrackscamps n 7 time planner cannot assume fighting force organised structure barrack associated logistical support case combatant may mixed population hard distinguish general population n 8 see httpwwwunaidsorg httpwwwfhiorgenindexhtm", "ProcessedSent": "n 6 many case excombatants set join uniformed service go ddr process", "SentID": 10146 }, { "ParagraphID": 2894, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Bazergan, R., Intervention and Intercourse: HIV\/AIDS and peacekeepers, Conflict, Security and Develop- ment, vol 3 no 1, April 2003, King\u2019s College, London, pp. 27\u201351. \\n 2 http:\/\/www.un.org\/docs\/sc\/. \\n 3 Ibid. \\n 4 Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Settings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \\n 5 HIV risk in militaries is related to specific contexts, with a number of influencing factors, including the context in which troops are deployed. Many AIDS interventions by ministries of defence have been effective, and have reduced HIV infection rates in the uniformed services. \\n 6 In many cases, ex-combatants who are set to join a uniformed service do not go through the DDR process. There would still be a potential benefit, however, in instances where HIV\/AIDS awareness has started in the barracks\/camps. \\n 7 At the same time planners cannot assume that all fighting forces will have an organised structure in barracks with the associated logistical support. In some cases, combatants may be mixed with the population and hard to distinguish from the general population. \\n 8 See http:\/\/www.unaids.org and http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/index.htm.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Bazergan, R., Intervention and Intercourse: HIV\/AIDS and peacekeepers, Conflict, Security and Develop- ment, vol 3 no 1, April 2003, King\u2019s College, London, pp. 27\u201351. \n 2 http:\/\/www.un.org\/docs\/sc\/. \n 3 Ibid. \n 4 Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Settings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \n 5 HIV risk in militaries is related to specific contexts, with a number of influencing factors, including the context in which troops are deployed. Many AIDS interventions by ministries of defence have been effective, and have reduced HIV infection rates in the uniformed services. \n 6 In many cases, ex-combatants who are set to join a uniformed service do not go through the DDR process. There would still be a potential benefit, however, in instances where HIV\/AIDS awareness has started in the barracks\/camps. \n 7 At the same time planners cannot assume that all fighting forces will have an organised structure in barracks with the associated logistical support. In some cases, combatants may be mixed with the population and hard to distinguish from the general population. \n 8 See http:\/\/www.unaids.org and http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/index.htm.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182665,7 +182665,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2894, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Bazergan, R., Intervention and Intercourse: HIV\/AIDS and peacekeepers, Conflict, Security and Develop- ment, vol 3 no 1, April 2003, King\u2019s College, London, pp. 27\u201351. \\n 2 http:\/\/www.un.org\/docs\/sc\/. \\n 3 Ibid. \\n 4 Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Settings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \\n 5 HIV risk in militaries is related to specific contexts, with a number of influencing factors, including the context in which troops are deployed. Many AIDS interventions by ministries of defence have been effective, and have reduced HIV infection rates in the uniformed services. \\n 6 In many cases, ex-combatants who are set to join a uniformed service do not go through the DDR process. There would still be a potential benefit, however, in instances where HIV\/AIDS awareness has started in the barracks\/camps. \\n 7 At the same time planners cannot assume that all fighting forces will have an organised structure in barracks with the associated logistical support. In some cases, combatants may be mixed with the population and hard to distinguish from the general population. \\n 8 See http:\/\/www.unaids.org and http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/index.htm.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Bazergan, R., Intervention and Intercourse: HIV\/AIDS and peacekeepers, Conflict, Security and Develop- ment, vol 3 no 1, April 2003, King\u2019s College, London, pp. 27\u201351. \n 2 http:\/\/www.un.org\/docs\/sc\/. \n 3 Ibid. \n 4 Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Settings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \n 5 HIV risk in militaries is related to specific contexts, with a number of influencing factors, including the context in which troops are deployed. Many AIDS interventions by ministries of defence have been effective, and have reduced HIV infection rates in the uniformed services. \n 6 In many cases, ex-combatants who are set to join a uniformed service do not go through the DDR process. There would still be a potential benefit, however, in instances where HIV\/AIDS awareness has started in the barracks\/camps. \n 7 At the same time planners cannot assume that all fighting forces will have an organised structure in barracks with the associated logistical support. In some cases, combatants may be mixed with the population and hard to distinguish from the general population. \n 8 See http:\/\/www.unaids.org and http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/index.htm.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182676,14 +182676,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 7 At the same time planners cannot assume that all fighting forces will have an organised structure in barracks with the associated logistical support.", + "Sentence": "\n 7 At the same time planners cannot assume that all fighting forces will have an organised structure in barracks with the associated logistical support.", "newParagraph": "n 1 bazergan r intervention intercourse hivaids peacekeeper conflict security develop ment vol 3 1 april 2003 king college london pp 27 51 n 2 httpwwwunorgdocssc n 3 ibid n 4 interagency standing committee guideline hivaids intervention emergency setting httpwwwhumanitarianinfoorgiasc n 5 hiv risk military related specific context number influencing factor including context troop deployed many aid intervention ministry defence effective reduced hiv infection rate uniformed service n 6 many case excombatants set join uniformed service go ddr process would still potential benefit however instance hivaids awareness started barrackscamps n 7 time planner cannot assume fighting force organised structure barrack associated logistical support case combatant may mixed population hard distinguish general population n 8 see httpwwwunaidsorg httpwwwfhiorgenindexhtm", "ProcessedSent": "n 7 time planner cannot assume fighting force organised structure barrack associated logistical support", "SentID": 10148 }, { "ParagraphID": 2894, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Bazergan, R., Intervention and Intercourse: HIV\/AIDS and peacekeepers, Conflict, Security and Develop- ment, vol 3 no 1, April 2003, King\u2019s College, London, pp. 27\u201351. \\n 2 http:\/\/www.un.org\/docs\/sc\/. \\n 3 Ibid. \\n 4 Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Settings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \\n 5 HIV risk in militaries is related to specific contexts, with a number of influencing factors, including the context in which troops are deployed. Many AIDS interventions by ministries of defence have been effective, and have reduced HIV infection rates in the uniformed services. \\n 6 In many cases, ex-combatants who are set to join a uniformed service do not go through the DDR process. There would still be a potential benefit, however, in instances where HIV\/AIDS awareness has started in the barracks\/camps. \\n 7 At the same time planners cannot assume that all fighting forces will have an organised structure in barracks with the associated logistical support. In some cases, combatants may be mixed with the population and hard to distinguish from the general population. \\n 8 See http:\/\/www.unaids.org and http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/index.htm.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Bazergan, R., Intervention and Intercourse: HIV\/AIDS and peacekeepers, Conflict, Security and Develop- ment, vol 3 no 1, April 2003, King\u2019s College, London, pp. 27\u201351. \n 2 http:\/\/www.un.org\/docs\/sc\/. \n 3 Ibid. \n 4 Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Settings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \n 5 HIV risk in militaries is related to specific contexts, with a number of influencing factors, including the context in which troops are deployed. Many AIDS interventions by ministries of defence have been effective, and have reduced HIV infection rates in the uniformed services. \n 6 In many cases, ex-combatants who are set to join a uniformed service do not go through the DDR process. There would still be a potential benefit, however, in instances where HIV\/AIDS awareness has started in the barracks\/camps. \n 7 At the same time planners cannot assume that all fighting forces will have an organised structure in barracks with the associated logistical support. In some cases, combatants may be mixed with the population and hard to distinguish from the general population. \n 8 See http:\/\/www.unaids.org and http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/index.htm.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182701,7 +182701,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2894, - "Paragraph": "\\n 1 Bazergan, R., Intervention and Intercourse: HIV\/AIDS and peacekeepers, Conflict, Security and Develop- ment, vol 3 no 1, April 2003, King\u2019s College, London, pp. 27\u201351. \\n 2 http:\/\/www.un.org\/docs\/sc\/. \\n 3 Ibid. \\n 4 Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Settings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \\n 5 HIV risk in militaries is related to specific contexts, with a number of influencing factors, including the context in which troops are deployed. Many AIDS interventions by ministries of defence have been effective, and have reduced HIV infection rates in the uniformed services. \\n 6 In many cases, ex-combatants who are set to join a uniformed service do not go through the DDR process. There would still be a potential benefit, however, in instances where HIV\/AIDS awareness has started in the barracks\/camps. \\n 7 At the same time planners cannot assume that all fighting forces will have an organised structure in barracks with the associated logistical support. In some cases, combatants may be mixed with the population and hard to distinguish from the general population. \\n 8 See http:\/\/www.unaids.org and http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/index.htm.", + "Paragraph": "\n 1 Bazergan, R., Intervention and Intercourse: HIV\/AIDS and peacekeepers, Conflict, Security and Develop- ment, vol 3 no 1, April 2003, King\u2019s College, London, pp. 27\u201351. \n 2 http:\/\/www.un.org\/docs\/sc\/. \n 3 Ibid. \n 4 Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for HIV\/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Settings, http:\/\/www.humanitarianinfo.org\/iasc. \n 5 HIV risk in militaries is related to specific contexts, with a number of influencing factors, including the context in which troops are deployed. Many AIDS interventions by ministries of defence have been effective, and have reduced HIV infection rates in the uniformed services. \n 6 In many cases, ex-combatants who are set to join a uniformed service do not go through the DDR process. There would still be a potential benefit, however, in instances where HIV\/AIDS awareness has started in the barracks\/camps. \n 7 At the same time planners cannot assume that all fighting forces will have an organised structure in barracks with the associated logistical support. In some cases, combatants may be mixed with the population and hard to distinguish from the general population. \n 8 See http:\/\/www.unaids.org and http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/index.htm.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182712,7 +182712,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 8 See http:\/\/www.unaids.org and http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/index.htm.", + "Sentence": "\n 8 See http:\/\/www.unaids.org and http:\/\/www.fhi.org\/en\/index.htm.", "newParagraph": "n 1 bazergan r intervention intercourse hivaids peacekeeper conflict security develop ment vol 3 1 april 2003 king college london pp 27 51 n 2 httpwwwunorgdocssc n 3 ibid n 4 interagency standing committee guideline hivaids intervention emergency setting httpwwwhumanitarianinfoorgiasc n 5 hiv risk military related specific context number influencing factor including context troop deployed many aid intervention ministry defence effective reduced hiv infection rate uniformed service n 6 many case excombatants set join uniformed service go ddr process would still potential benefit however instance hivaids awareness started barrackscamps n 7 time planner cannot assume fighting force organised structure barrack associated logistical support case combatant may mixed population hard distinguish general population n 8 see httpwwwunaidsorg httpwwwfhiorgenindexhtm", "ProcessedSent": "n 8 see httpwwwunaidsorg httpwwwfhiorgenindexhtm", "SentID": 10150 @@ -182881,7 +182881,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2898, - "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182899,7 +182899,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2898, - "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182917,7 +182917,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2898, - "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182935,7 +182935,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2898, - "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -182946,7 +182946,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "newParagraph": "annex contains list term definition abbreviation used standard com plete glossary term definition abbreviation used series integrated ddr standard iddrs given iddrs 120 iddrs series word shall may must used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "ProcessedSent": "use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "SentID": 10163 @@ -183007,7 +183007,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2900, - "Paragraph": "The priority of public health partners in DDR is: \\n to assess health situations and monitor levels of risk; \\n to co-ordinate the work of health actors and others whose activities contribute to health (e.g., food programmes); \\n to provide \u2014 or to ensure that others provide \u2014 key health services that may be lacking in particular contexts where DDR programmes are operating; \\n to build capacity within national authorities and civil society.", + "Paragraph": "The priority of public health partners in DDR is: \n to assess health situations and monitor levels of risk; \n to co-ordinate the work of health actors and others whose activities contribute to health (e.g., food programmes); \n to provide \u2014 or to ensure that others provide \u2014 key health services that may be lacking in particular contexts where DDR programmes are operating; \n to build capacity within national authorities and civil society.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -183018,14 +183018,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The priority of public health partners in DDR is: \\n to assess health situations and monitor levels of risk; \\n to co-ordinate the work of health actors and others whose activities contribute to health (e.g., food programmes); \\n to provide \u2014 or to ensure that others provide \u2014 key health services that may be lacking in particular contexts where DDR programmes are operating; \\n to build capacity within national authorities and civil society.", + "Sentence": "The priority of public health partners in DDR is: \n to assess health situations and monitor levels of risk; \n to co-ordinate the work of health actors and others whose activities contribute to health (e.g., food programmes); \n to provide \u2014 or to ensure that others provide \u2014 key health services that may be lacking in particular contexts where DDR programmes are operating; \n to build capacity within national authorities and civil society.", "newParagraph": "priority public health partner ddr n ass health situation monitor level risk n coordinate work health actor others whose activity contribute health eg food programme n provide ensure others provide key health service may lacking particular context ddr programme operating n build capacity within national authority civil society", "ProcessedSent": "priority public health partner ddr n ass health situation monitor level risk n coordinate work health actor others whose activity contribute health eg food programme n provide ensure others provide key health service may lacking particular context ddr programme operating n build capacity within national authority civil society", "SentID": 10167 }, { "ParagraphID": 2901, - "Paragraph": "Experience shows that, even with the technical support offered by UN and partner agencies, meeting these priorities can be difficult. Both in the initial demobilization phase and afterwards in the reintegration period, combatants, child soldiers, women associated with armed forces and groups, and their dependants may present a range of specific needs to which the national health sector is not always capable of responding. While the basic mech- anisms governing the interaction between individuals and the various threats to their health are very much the same anywhere, what alters is the environment where these interactions take place, e.g., in terms of epidemiological profile, security and political context. In each country where a DDR process is being implemented, even without considering the different features of each process itself, a unique set of health needs will have to be met. Nonetheless, some general lessons can be drawn from the past: \\n In DDR processes, the short-term planning that is part of humanitarian interventions also needs to be built into a medium- to long-term framework. This applies to health as well as to other sectors;1 \\n A clear understanding of the various phases laid out in the peace process in general and specified for DDR in particular is vital for the appropriate timing, delivery and targeting of health activities;2 \\n The capacity to identify and engage key stakeholders and build long-term capacity is essential for coordination, implementation and sustainability.", + "Paragraph": "Experience shows that, even with the technical support offered by UN and partner agencies, meeting these priorities can be difficult. Both in the initial demobilization phase and afterwards in the reintegration period, combatants, child soldiers, women associated with armed forces and groups, and their dependants may present a range of specific needs to which the national health sector is not always capable of responding. While the basic mech- anisms governing the interaction between individuals and the various threats to their health are very much the same anywhere, what alters is the environment where these interactions take place, e.g., in terms of epidemiological profile, security and political context. In each country where a DDR process is being implemented, even without considering the different features of each process itself, a unique set of health needs will have to be met. Nonetheless, some general lessons can be drawn from the past: \n In DDR processes, the short-term planning that is part of humanitarian interventions also needs to be built into a medium- to long-term framework. This applies to health as well as to other sectors;1 \n A clear understanding of the various phases laid out in the peace process in general and specified for DDR in particular is vital for the appropriate timing, delivery and targeting of health activities;2 \n The capacity to identify and engage key stakeholders and build long-term capacity is essential for coordination, implementation and sustainability.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -183043,7 +183043,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2901, - "Paragraph": "Experience shows that, even with the technical support offered by UN and partner agencies, meeting these priorities can be difficult. Both in the initial demobilization phase and afterwards in the reintegration period, combatants, child soldiers, women associated with armed forces and groups, and their dependants may present a range of specific needs to which the national health sector is not always capable of responding. While the basic mech- anisms governing the interaction between individuals and the various threats to their health are very much the same anywhere, what alters is the environment where these interactions take place, e.g., in terms of epidemiological profile, security and political context. In each country where a DDR process is being implemented, even without considering the different features of each process itself, a unique set of health needs will have to be met. Nonetheless, some general lessons can be drawn from the past: \\n In DDR processes, the short-term planning that is part of humanitarian interventions also needs to be built into a medium- to long-term framework. This applies to health as well as to other sectors;1 \\n A clear understanding of the various phases laid out in the peace process in general and specified for DDR in particular is vital for the appropriate timing, delivery and targeting of health activities;2 \\n The capacity to identify and engage key stakeholders and build long-term capacity is essential for coordination, implementation and sustainability.", + "Paragraph": "Experience shows that, even with the technical support offered by UN and partner agencies, meeting these priorities can be difficult. Both in the initial demobilization phase and afterwards in the reintegration period, combatants, child soldiers, women associated with armed forces and groups, and their dependants may present a range of specific needs to which the national health sector is not always capable of responding. While the basic mech- anisms governing the interaction between individuals and the various threats to their health are very much the same anywhere, what alters is the environment where these interactions take place, e.g., in terms of epidemiological profile, security and political context. In each country where a DDR process is being implemented, even without considering the different features of each process itself, a unique set of health needs will have to be met. Nonetheless, some general lessons can be drawn from the past: \n In DDR processes, the short-term planning that is part of humanitarian interventions also needs to be built into a medium- to long-term framework. This applies to health as well as to other sectors;1 \n A clear understanding of the various phases laid out in the peace process in general and specified for DDR in particular is vital for the appropriate timing, delivery and targeting of health activities;2 \n The capacity to identify and engage key stakeholders and build long-term capacity is essential for coordination, implementation and sustainability.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -183061,7 +183061,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2901, - "Paragraph": "Experience shows that, even with the technical support offered by UN and partner agencies, meeting these priorities can be difficult. Both in the initial demobilization phase and afterwards in the reintegration period, combatants, child soldiers, women associated with armed forces and groups, and their dependants may present a range of specific needs to which the national health sector is not always capable of responding. While the basic mech- anisms governing the interaction between individuals and the various threats to their health are very much the same anywhere, what alters is the environment where these interactions take place, e.g., in terms of epidemiological profile, security and political context. In each country where a DDR process is being implemented, even without considering the different features of each process itself, a unique set of health needs will have to be met. Nonetheless, some general lessons can be drawn from the past: \\n In DDR processes, the short-term planning that is part of humanitarian interventions also needs to be built into a medium- to long-term framework. This applies to health as well as to other sectors;1 \\n A clear understanding of the various phases laid out in the peace process in general and specified for DDR in particular is vital for the appropriate timing, delivery and targeting of health activities;2 \\n The capacity to identify and engage key stakeholders and build long-term capacity is essential for coordination, implementation and sustainability.", + "Paragraph": "Experience shows that, even with the technical support offered by UN and partner agencies, meeting these priorities can be difficult. Both in the initial demobilization phase and afterwards in the reintegration period, combatants, child soldiers, women associated with armed forces and groups, and their dependants may present a range of specific needs to which the national health sector is not always capable of responding. While the basic mech- anisms governing the interaction between individuals and the various threats to their health are very much the same anywhere, what alters is the environment where these interactions take place, e.g., in terms of epidemiological profile, security and political context. In each country where a DDR process is being implemented, even without considering the different features of each process itself, a unique set of health needs will have to be met. Nonetheless, some general lessons can be drawn from the past: \n In DDR processes, the short-term planning that is part of humanitarian interventions also needs to be built into a medium- to long-term framework. This applies to health as well as to other sectors;1 \n A clear understanding of the various phases laid out in the peace process in general and specified for DDR in particular is vital for the appropriate timing, delivery and targeting of health activities;2 \n The capacity to identify and engage key stakeholders and build long-term capacity is essential for coordination, implementation and sustainability.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -183079,7 +183079,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2901, - "Paragraph": "Experience shows that, even with the technical support offered by UN and partner agencies, meeting these priorities can be difficult. Both in the initial demobilization phase and afterwards in the reintegration period, combatants, child soldiers, women associated with armed forces and groups, and their dependants may present a range of specific needs to which the national health sector is not always capable of responding. While the basic mech- anisms governing the interaction between individuals and the various threats to their health are very much the same anywhere, what alters is the environment where these interactions take place, e.g., in terms of epidemiological profile, security and political context. In each country where a DDR process is being implemented, even without considering the different features of each process itself, a unique set of health needs will have to be met. Nonetheless, some general lessons can be drawn from the past: \\n In DDR processes, the short-term planning that is part of humanitarian interventions also needs to be built into a medium- to long-term framework. This applies to health as well as to other sectors;1 \\n A clear understanding of the various phases laid out in the peace process in general and specified for DDR in particular is vital for the appropriate timing, delivery and targeting of health activities;2 \\n The capacity to identify and engage key stakeholders and build long-term capacity is essential for coordination, implementation and sustainability.", + "Paragraph": "Experience shows that, even with the technical support offered by UN and partner agencies, meeting these priorities can be difficult. Both in the initial demobilization phase and afterwards in the reintegration period, combatants, child soldiers, women associated with armed forces and groups, and their dependants may present a range of specific needs to which the national health sector is not always capable of responding. While the basic mech- anisms governing the interaction between individuals and the various threats to their health are very much the same anywhere, what alters is the environment where these interactions take place, e.g., in terms of epidemiological profile, security and political context. In each country where a DDR process is being implemented, even without considering the different features of each process itself, a unique set of health needs will have to be met. Nonetheless, some general lessons can be drawn from the past: \n In DDR processes, the short-term planning that is part of humanitarian interventions also needs to be built into a medium- to long-term framework. This applies to health as well as to other sectors;1 \n A clear understanding of the various phases laid out in the peace process in general and specified for DDR in particular is vital for the appropriate timing, delivery and targeting of health activities;2 \n The capacity to identify and engage key stakeholders and build long-term capacity is essential for coordination, implementation and sustainability.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -183097,7 +183097,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2901, - "Paragraph": "Experience shows that, even with the technical support offered by UN and partner agencies, meeting these priorities can be difficult. Both in the initial demobilization phase and afterwards in the reintegration period, combatants, child soldiers, women associated with armed forces and groups, and their dependants may present a range of specific needs to which the national health sector is not always capable of responding. While the basic mech- anisms governing the interaction between individuals and the various threats to their health are very much the same anywhere, what alters is the environment where these interactions take place, e.g., in terms of epidemiological profile, security and political context. In each country where a DDR process is being implemented, even without considering the different features of each process itself, a unique set of health needs will have to be met. Nonetheless, some general lessons can be drawn from the past: \\n In DDR processes, the short-term planning that is part of humanitarian interventions also needs to be built into a medium- to long-term framework. This applies to health as well as to other sectors;1 \\n A clear understanding of the various phases laid out in the peace process in general and specified for DDR in particular is vital for the appropriate timing, delivery and targeting of health activities;2 \\n The capacity to identify and engage key stakeholders and build long-term capacity is essential for coordination, implementation and sustainability.", + "Paragraph": "Experience shows that, even with the technical support offered by UN and partner agencies, meeting these priorities can be difficult. Both in the initial demobilization phase and afterwards in the reintegration period, combatants, child soldiers, women associated with armed forces and groups, and their dependants may present a range of specific needs to which the national health sector is not always capable of responding. While the basic mech- anisms governing the interaction between individuals and the various threats to their health are very much the same anywhere, what alters is the environment where these interactions take place, e.g., in terms of epidemiological profile, security and political context. In each country where a DDR process is being implemented, even without considering the different features of each process itself, a unique set of health needs will have to be met. Nonetheless, some general lessons can be drawn from the past: \n In DDR processes, the short-term planning that is part of humanitarian interventions also needs to be built into a medium- to long-term framework. This applies to health as well as to other sectors;1 \n A clear understanding of the various phases laid out in the peace process in general and specified for DDR in particular is vital for the appropriate timing, delivery and targeting of health activities;2 \n The capacity to identify and engage key stakeholders and build long-term capacity is essential for coordination, implementation and sustainability.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -183108,14 +183108,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Nonetheless, some general lessons can be drawn from the past: \\n In DDR processes, the short-term planning that is part of humanitarian interventions also needs to be built into a medium- to long-term framework.", + "Sentence": "Nonetheless, some general lessons can be drawn from the past: \n In DDR processes, the short-term planning that is part of humanitarian interventions also needs to be built into a medium- to long-term framework.", "newParagraph": "experience show even technical support offered un partner agency meeting priority difficult initial demobilization phase afterwards reintegration period combatant child soldier woman associated armed force group dependant may present range specific need national health sector always capable responding basic mech anisms governing interaction individual various threat health much anywhere alters environment interaction take place eg term epidemiological profile security political context country ddr process implemented even without considering different feature process unique set health need met nonetheless general lesson drawn past n ddr process shortterm planning part humanitarian intervention also need built medium longterm framework applies health well sectors1 n clear understanding various phase laid peace process general specified ddr particular vital appropriate timing delivery targeting health activities2 n capacity identify engage key stakeholder build longterm capacity essential coordination implementation sustainability", "ProcessedSent": "nonetheless general lesson drawn past n ddr process shortterm planning part humanitarian intervention also need built medium longterm framework", "SentID": 10172 }, { "ParagraphID": 2901, - "Paragraph": "Experience shows that, even with the technical support offered by UN and partner agencies, meeting these priorities can be difficult. Both in the initial demobilization phase and afterwards in the reintegration period, combatants, child soldiers, women associated with armed forces and groups, and their dependants may present a range of specific needs to which the national health sector is not always capable of responding. While the basic mech- anisms governing the interaction between individuals and the various threats to their health are very much the same anywhere, what alters is the environment where these interactions take place, e.g., in terms of epidemiological profile, security and political context. In each country where a DDR process is being implemented, even without considering the different features of each process itself, a unique set of health needs will have to be met. Nonetheless, some general lessons can be drawn from the past: \\n In DDR processes, the short-term planning that is part of humanitarian interventions also needs to be built into a medium- to long-term framework. This applies to health as well as to other sectors;1 \\n A clear understanding of the various phases laid out in the peace process in general and specified for DDR in particular is vital for the appropriate timing, delivery and targeting of health activities;2 \\n The capacity to identify and engage key stakeholders and build long-term capacity is essential for coordination, implementation and sustainability.", + "Paragraph": "Experience shows that, even with the technical support offered by UN and partner agencies, meeting these priorities can be difficult. Both in the initial demobilization phase and afterwards in the reintegration period, combatants, child soldiers, women associated with armed forces and groups, and their dependants may present a range of specific needs to which the national health sector is not always capable of responding. While the basic mech- anisms governing the interaction between individuals and the various threats to their health are very much the same anywhere, what alters is the environment where these interactions take place, e.g., in terms of epidemiological profile, security and political context. In each country where a DDR process is being implemented, even without considering the different features of each process itself, a unique set of health needs will have to be met. Nonetheless, some general lessons can be drawn from the past: \n In DDR processes, the short-term planning that is part of humanitarian interventions also needs to be built into a medium- to long-term framework. This applies to health as well as to other sectors;1 \n A clear understanding of the various phases laid out in the peace process in general and specified for DDR in particular is vital for the appropriate timing, delivery and targeting of health activities;2 \n The capacity to identify and engage key stakeholders and build long-term capacity is essential for coordination, implementation and sustainability.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -183126,14 +183126,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This applies to health as well as to other sectors;1 \\n A clear understanding of the various phases laid out in the peace process in general and specified for DDR in particular is vital for the appropriate timing, delivery and targeting of health activities;2 \\n The capacity to identify and engage key stakeholders and build long-term capacity is essential for coordination, implementation and sustainability.", + "Sentence": "This applies to health as well as to other sectors;1 \n A clear understanding of the various phases laid out in the peace process in general and specified for DDR in particular is vital for the appropriate timing, delivery and targeting of health activities;2 \n The capacity to identify and engage key stakeholders and build long-term capacity is essential for coordination, implementation and sustainability.", "newParagraph": "experience show even technical support offered un partner agency meeting priority difficult initial demobilization phase afterwards reintegration period combatant child soldier woman associated armed force group dependant may present range specific need national health sector always capable responding basic mech anisms governing interaction individual various threat health much anywhere alters environment interaction take place eg term epidemiological profile security political context country ddr process implemented even without considering different feature process unique set health need met nonetheless general lesson drawn past n ddr process shortterm planning part humanitarian intervention also need built medium longterm framework applies health well sectors1 n clear understanding various phase laid peace process general specified ddr particular vital appropriate timing delivery targeting health activities2 n capacity identify engage key stakeholder build longterm capacity essential coordination implementation sustainability", "ProcessedSent": "applies health well sectors1 n clear understanding various phase laid peace process general specified ddr particular vital appropriate timing delivery targeting health activities2 n capacity identify engage key stakeholder build longterm capacity essential coordination implementation sustainability", "SentID": 10173 }, { "ParagraphID": 2902, - "Paragraph": "Health action should always prioritize basic preventive and curative care to manage the entire range of health threats in the geographical area, and deal with the specific risks that threaten the target population. Health action within a DDR process should apply four key principles: \\n Principle 1: Health programmes\/actions that are part of DDR should be devised in coordi- nation with plans to rehabilitate the entire health system of the country, and to build local and national capacity; and they should be planned and implemented in cooperation and consultation with the national authorities and other key stakeholders so that resources are equitably shared and the long-term health needs of former combatants, women associated with armed groups and forces, their family members and communities of reintegration are sustainably met; \\n Principle 2: Health programmes\/actions that are part of DDR should promote and respect ethical and internationally accepted human rights standards; \\n Principle 3: Health programmes\/actions that are part of DDR should be devised after careful analysis of different needs and in consultation with a variety of representatives (male and female, adults, youth and children) of the various fighting factions; and services offered during demobilization should specifically deal with the variety of health needs presented by adult and young combatants and women associated with armed groups and forces; \\n Principle 4: In the reintegration part of DDR, as an essential component of community- based DDR in resource-poor environments, health programmes\/actions should be open to all those in need, not only those formerly associated with armed groups and forces.", + "Paragraph": "Health action should always prioritize basic preventive and curative care to manage the entire range of health threats in the geographical area, and deal with the specific risks that threaten the target population. Health action within a DDR process should apply four key principles: \n Principle 1: Health programmes\/actions that are part of DDR should be devised in coordi- nation with plans to rehabilitate the entire health system of the country, and to build local and national capacity; and they should be planned and implemented in cooperation and consultation with the national authorities and other key stakeholders so that resources are equitably shared and the long-term health needs of former combatants, women associated with armed groups and forces, their family members and communities of reintegration are sustainably met; \n Principle 2: Health programmes\/actions that are part of DDR should promote and respect ethical and internationally accepted human rights standards; \n Principle 3: Health programmes\/actions that are part of DDR should be devised after careful analysis of different needs and in consultation with a variety of representatives (male and female, adults, youth and children) of the various fighting factions; and services offered during demobilization should specifically deal with the variety of health needs presented by adult and young combatants and women associated with armed groups and forces; \n Principle 4: In the reintegration part of DDR, as an essential component of community- based DDR in resource-poor environments, health programmes\/actions should be open to all those in need, not only those formerly associated with armed groups and forces.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -183151,7 +183151,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2902, - "Paragraph": "Health action should always prioritize basic preventive and curative care to manage the entire range of health threats in the geographical area, and deal with the specific risks that threaten the target population. Health action within a DDR process should apply four key principles: \\n Principle 1: Health programmes\/actions that are part of DDR should be devised in coordi- nation with plans to rehabilitate the entire health system of the country, and to build local and national capacity; and they should be planned and implemented in cooperation and consultation with the national authorities and other key stakeholders so that resources are equitably shared and the long-term health needs of former combatants, women associated with armed groups and forces, their family members and communities of reintegration are sustainably met; \\n Principle 2: Health programmes\/actions that are part of DDR should promote and respect ethical and internationally accepted human rights standards; \\n Principle 3: Health programmes\/actions that are part of DDR should be devised after careful analysis of different needs and in consultation with a variety of representatives (male and female, adults, youth and children) of the various fighting factions; and services offered during demobilization should specifically deal with the variety of health needs presented by adult and young combatants and women associated with armed groups and forces; \\n Principle 4: In the reintegration part of DDR, as an essential component of community- based DDR in resource-poor environments, health programmes\/actions should be open to all those in need, not only those formerly associated with armed groups and forces.", + "Paragraph": "Health action should always prioritize basic preventive and curative care to manage the entire range of health threats in the geographical area, and deal with the specific risks that threaten the target population. Health action within a DDR process should apply four key principles: \n Principle 1: Health programmes\/actions that are part of DDR should be devised in coordi- nation with plans to rehabilitate the entire health system of the country, and to build local and national capacity; and they should be planned and implemented in cooperation and consultation with the national authorities and other key stakeholders so that resources are equitably shared and the long-term health needs of former combatants, women associated with armed groups and forces, their family members and communities of reintegration are sustainably met; \n Principle 2: Health programmes\/actions that are part of DDR should promote and respect ethical and internationally accepted human rights standards; \n Principle 3: Health programmes\/actions that are part of DDR should be devised after careful analysis of different needs and in consultation with a variety of representatives (male and female, adults, youth and children) of the various fighting factions; and services offered during demobilization should specifically deal with the variety of health needs presented by adult and young combatants and women associated with armed groups and forces; \n Principle 4: In the reintegration part of DDR, as an essential component of community- based DDR in resource-poor environments, health programmes\/actions should be open to all those in need, not only those formerly associated with armed groups and forces.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -183162,7 +183162,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Health action within a DDR process should apply four key principles: \\n Principle 1: Health programmes\/actions that are part of DDR should be devised in coordi- nation with plans to rehabilitate the entire health system of the country, and to build local and national capacity; and they should be planned and implemented in cooperation and consultation with the national authorities and other key stakeholders so that resources are equitably shared and the long-term health needs of former combatants, women associated with armed groups and forces, their family members and communities of reintegration are sustainably met; \\n Principle 2: Health programmes\/actions that are part of DDR should promote and respect ethical and internationally accepted human rights standards; \\n Principle 3: Health programmes\/actions that are part of DDR should be devised after careful analysis of different needs and in consultation with a variety of representatives (male and female, adults, youth and children) of the various fighting factions; and services offered during demobilization should specifically deal with the variety of health needs presented by adult and young combatants and women associated with armed groups and forces; \\n Principle 4: In the reintegration part of DDR, as an essential component of community- based DDR in resource-poor environments, health programmes\/actions should be open to all those in need, not only those formerly associated with armed groups and forces.", + "Sentence": "Health action within a DDR process should apply four key principles: \n Principle 1: Health programmes\/actions that are part of DDR should be devised in coordi- nation with plans to rehabilitate the entire health system of the country, and to build local and national capacity; and they should be planned and implemented in cooperation and consultation with the national authorities and other key stakeholders so that resources are equitably shared and the long-term health needs of former combatants, women associated with armed groups and forces, their family members and communities of reintegration are sustainably met; \n Principle 2: Health programmes\/actions that are part of DDR should promote and respect ethical and internationally accepted human rights standards; \n Principle 3: Health programmes\/actions that are part of DDR should be devised after careful analysis of different needs and in consultation with a variety of representatives (male and female, adults, youth and children) of the various fighting factions; and services offered during demobilization should specifically deal with the variety of health needs presented by adult and young combatants and women associated with armed groups and forces; \n Principle 4: In the reintegration part of DDR, as an essential component of community- based DDR in resource-poor environments, health programmes\/actions should be open to all those in need, not only those formerly associated with armed groups and forces.", "newParagraph": "health action always prioritize basic preventive curative care manage entire range health threat geographical area deal specific risk threaten target population health action within ddr process apply four key principle n principle 1 health programmesactions part ddr devised coordi nation plan rehabilitate entire health system country build local national capacity planned implemented cooperation consultation national authority key stakeholder resource equitably shared longterm health need former combatant woman associated armed group force family member community reintegration sustainably met n principle 2 health programmesactions part ddr promote respect ethical internationally accepted human right standard n principle 3 health programmesactions part ddr devised careful analysis different need consultation variety representative male female adult youth child various fighting faction service offered demobilization specifically deal variety health need presented adult young combatant woman associated armed group force n principle 4 reintegration part ddr essential component community based ddr resourcepoor environment health programmesactions open need formerly associated armed group force", "ProcessedSent": "health action within ddr process apply four key principle n principle 1 health programmesactions part ddr devised coordi nation plan rehabilitate entire health system country build local national capacity planned implemented cooperation consultation national authority key stakeholder resource equitably shared longterm health need former combatant woman associated armed group force family member community reintegration sustainably met n principle 2 health programmesactions part ddr promote respect ethical internationally accepted human right standard n principle 3 health programmesactions part ddr devised careful analysis different need consultation variety representative male female adult youth child various fighting faction service offered demobilization specifically deal variety health need presented adult young combatant woman associated armed group force n principle 4 reintegration part ddr essential component community based ddr resourcepoor environment health programmesactions open need formerly associated armed group force", "SentID": 10175 @@ -183403,7 +183403,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2908, - "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \\n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \\n Which actors are involved? \\n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \\n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \\n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \\n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \\n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \\n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \\n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \\n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \\n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \\n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \\n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \\n What is the time-frame for each phase? \\n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", + "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \n Which actors are involved? \n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \n What is the time-frame for each phase? \n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -183414,14 +183414,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Linking health action to DDR and the peace process", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \\n What are the key features of the peace protocols?", + "Sentence": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \n What are the key features of the peace protocols?", "newParagraph": "key question preplanning assessment n key feature peace protocol n actor involved n many armed group force participated peace negotiation makeup term age sex n foreign troop eg foreign mercenary among n peace protocol require change administrative system country health system affected n role un play achieving peace accord agency deployed facilitate implementation different aspect n coordinate healthrelated aspect integrated interagency ddr effort ministry health medical service peacekeeping mission unfpa food agency n world food programme wfp implementing partner etc set un coordinating mechanism division responsibility etc n national steering bodiescommittees ddr planned joint commission transitional government national commission ddr working group etc n member mandate body n health sector represented body n assistance combatant set peace protocol plan made ddr n phase ddr process planned n timeframe phase n role canshould health sector play phase", "ProcessedSent": "key question preplanning assessment n key feature peace protocol", "SentID": 10189 }, { "ParagraphID": 2908, - "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \\n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \\n Which actors are involved? \\n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \\n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \\n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \\n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \\n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \\n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \\n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \\n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \\n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \\n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \\n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \\n What is the time-frame for each phase? \\n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", + "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \n Which actors are involved? \n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \n What is the time-frame for each phase? \n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -183432,14 +183432,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Linking health action to DDR and the peace process", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Which actors are involved?", + "Sentence": "\n Which actors are involved?", "newParagraph": "key question preplanning assessment n key feature peace protocol n actor involved n many armed group force participated peace negotiation makeup term age sex n foreign troop eg foreign mercenary among n peace protocol require change administrative system country health system affected n role un play achieving peace accord agency deployed facilitate implementation different aspect n coordinate healthrelated aspect integrated interagency ddr effort ministry health medical service peacekeeping mission unfpa food agency n world food programme wfp implementing partner etc set un coordinating mechanism division responsibility etc n national steering bodiescommittees ddr planned joint commission transitional government national commission ddr working group etc n member mandate body n health sector represented body n assistance combatant set peace protocol plan made ddr n phase ddr process planned n timeframe phase n role canshould health sector play phase", "ProcessedSent": "n actor involved", "SentID": 10190 }, { "ParagraphID": 2908, - "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \\n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \\n Which actors are involved? \\n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \\n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \\n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \\n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \\n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \\n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \\n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \\n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \\n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \\n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \\n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \\n What is the time-frame for each phase? \\n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", + "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \n Which actors are involved? \n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \n What is the time-frame for each phase? \n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -183450,14 +183450,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Linking health action to DDR and the peace process", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation?", + "Sentence": "\n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation?", "newParagraph": "key question preplanning assessment n key feature peace protocol n actor involved n many armed group force participated peace negotiation makeup term age sex n foreign troop eg foreign mercenary among n peace protocol require change administrative system country health system affected n role un play achieving peace accord agency deployed facilitate implementation different aspect n coordinate healthrelated aspect integrated interagency ddr effort ministry health medical service peacekeeping mission unfpa food agency n world food programme wfp implementing partner etc set un coordinating mechanism division responsibility etc n national steering bodiescommittees ddr planned joint commission transitional government national commission ddr working group etc n member mandate body n health sector represented body n assistance combatant set peace protocol plan made ddr n phase ddr process planned n timeframe phase n role canshould health sector play phase", "ProcessedSent": "n many armed group force participated peace negotiation", "SentID": 10191 }, { "ParagraphID": 2908, - "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \\n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \\n Which actors are involved? \\n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \\n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \\n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \\n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \\n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \\n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \\n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \\n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \\n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \\n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \\n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \\n What is the time-frame for each phase? \\n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", + "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \n Which actors are involved? \n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \n What is the time-frame for each phase? \n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -183475,7 +183475,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2908, - "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \\n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \\n Which actors are involved? \\n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \\n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \\n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \\n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \\n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \\n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \\n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \\n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \\n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \\n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \\n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \\n What is the time-frame for each phase? \\n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", + "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \n Which actors are involved? \n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \n What is the time-frame for each phase? \n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -183486,14 +183486,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Linking health action to DDR and the peace process", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them?", + "Sentence": "\n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them?", "newParagraph": "key question preplanning assessment n key feature peace protocol n actor involved n many armed group force participated peace negotiation makeup term age sex n foreign troop eg foreign mercenary among n peace protocol require change administrative system country health system affected n role un play achieving peace accord agency deployed facilitate implementation different aspect n coordinate healthrelated aspect integrated interagency ddr effort ministry health medical service peacekeeping mission unfpa food agency n world food programme wfp implementing partner etc set un coordinating mechanism division responsibility etc n national steering bodiescommittees ddr planned joint commission transitional government national commission ddr working group etc n member mandate body n health sector represented body n assistance combatant set peace protocol plan made ddr n phase ddr process planned n timeframe phase n role canshould health sector play phase", "ProcessedSent": "n foreign troop eg foreign mercenary among", "SentID": 10193 }, { "ParagraphID": 2908, - "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \\n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \\n Which actors are involved? \\n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \\n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \\n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \\n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \\n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \\n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \\n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \\n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \\n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \\n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \\n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \\n What is the time-frame for each phase? \\n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", + "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \n Which actors are involved? \n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \n What is the time-frame for each phase? \n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -183504,14 +183504,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Linking health action to DDR and the peace process", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country?", + "Sentence": "\n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country?", "newParagraph": "key question preplanning assessment n key feature peace protocol n actor involved n many armed group force participated peace negotiation makeup term age sex n foreign troop eg foreign mercenary among n peace protocol require change administrative system country health system affected n role un play achieving peace accord agency deployed facilitate implementation different aspect n coordinate healthrelated aspect integrated interagency ddr effort ministry health medical service peacekeeping mission unfpa food agency n world food programme wfp implementing partner etc set un coordinating mechanism division responsibility etc n national steering bodiescommittees ddr planned joint commission transitional government national commission ddr working group etc n member mandate body n health sector represented body n assistance combatant set peace protocol plan made ddr n phase ddr process planned n timeframe phase n role canshould health sector play phase", "ProcessedSent": "n peace protocol require change administrative system country", "SentID": 10194 }, { "ParagraphID": 2908, - "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \\n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \\n Which actors are involved? \\n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \\n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \\n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \\n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \\n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \\n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \\n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \\n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \\n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \\n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \\n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \\n What is the time-frame for each phase? \\n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", + "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \n Which actors are involved? \n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \n What is the time-frame for each phase? \n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -183529,7 +183529,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2908, - "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \\n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \\n Which actors are involved? \\n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \\n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \\n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \\n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \\n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \\n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \\n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \\n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \\n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \\n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \\n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \\n What is the time-frame for each phase? \\n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", + "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \n Which actors are involved? \n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \n What is the time-frame for each phase? \n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -183540,14 +183540,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Linking health action to DDR and the peace process", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects?", + "Sentence": "\n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects?", "newParagraph": "key question preplanning assessment n key feature peace protocol n actor involved n many armed group force participated peace negotiation makeup term age sex n foreign troop eg foreign mercenary among n peace protocol require change administrative system country health system affected n role un play achieving peace accord agency deployed facilitate implementation different aspect n coordinate healthrelated aspect integrated interagency ddr effort ministry health medical service peacekeeping mission unfpa food agency n world food programme wfp implementing partner etc set un coordinating mechanism division responsibility etc n national steering bodiescommittees ddr planned joint commission transitional government national commission ddr working group etc n member mandate body n health sector represented body n assistance combatant set peace protocol plan made ddr n phase ddr process planned n timeframe phase n role canshould health sector play phase", "ProcessedSent": "n role un play achieving peace accord agency deployed facilitate implementation different aspect", "SentID": 10196 }, { "ParagraphID": 2908, - "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \\n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \\n Which actors are involved? \\n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \\n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \\n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \\n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \\n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \\n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \\n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \\n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \\n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \\n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \\n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \\n What is the time-frame for each phase? \\n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", + "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \n Which actors are involved? \n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \n What is the time-frame for each phase? \n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -183558,14 +183558,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Linking health action to DDR and the peace process", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \\n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)?", + "Sentence": "\n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)?", "newParagraph": "key question preplanning assessment n key feature peace protocol n actor involved n many armed group force participated peace negotiation makeup term age sex n foreign troop eg foreign mercenary among n peace protocol require change administrative system country health system affected n role un play achieving peace accord agency deployed facilitate implementation different aspect n coordinate healthrelated aspect integrated interagency ddr effort ministry health medical service peacekeeping mission unfpa food agency n world food programme wfp implementing partner etc set un coordinating mechanism division responsibility etc n national steering bodiescommittees ddr planned joint commission transitional government national commission ddr working group etc n member mandate body n health sector represented body n assistance combatant set peace protocol plan made ddr n phase ddr process planned n timeframe phase n role canshould health sector play phase", "ProcessedSent": "n coordinate healthrelated aspect integrated interagency ddr effort ministry health medical service peacekeeping mission unfpa food agency n world food programme wfp implementing partner etc", "SentID": 10197 }, { "ParagraphID": 2908, - "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \\n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \\n Which actors are involved? \\n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \\n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \\n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \\n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \\n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \\n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \\n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \\n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \\n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \\n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \\n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \\n What is the time-frame for each phase? \\n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", + "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \n Which actors are involved? \n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \n What is the time-frame for each phase? \n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -183583,7 +183583,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2908, - "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \\n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \\n Which actors are involved? \\n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \\n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \\n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \\n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \\n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \\n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \\n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \\n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \\n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \\n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \\n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \\n What is the time-frame for each phase? \\n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", + "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \n Which actors are involved? \n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \n What is the time-frame for each phase? \n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -183594,14 +183594,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Linking health action to DDR and the peace process", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)?", + "Sentence": "\n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)?", "newParagraph": "key question preplanning assessment n key feature peace protocol n actor involved n many armed group force participated peace negotiation makeup term age sex n foreign troop eg foreign mercenary among n peace protocol require change administrative system country health system affected n role un play achieving peace accord agency deployed facilitate implementation different aspect n coordinate healthrelated aspect integrated interagency ddr effort ministry health medical service peacekeeping mission unfpa food agency n world food programme wfp implementing partner etc set un coordinating mechanism division responsibility etc n national steering bodiescommittees ddr planned joint commission transitional government national commission ddr working group etc n member mandate body n health sector represented body n assistance combatant set peace protocol plan made ddr n phase ddr process planned n timeframe phase n role canshould health sector play phase", "ProcessedSent": "n national steering bodiescommittees ddr planned joint commission transitional government national commission ddr working group etc", "SentID": 10199 }, { "ParagraphID": 2908, - "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \\n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \\n Which actors are involved? \\n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \\n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \\n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \\n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \\n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \\n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \\n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \\n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \\n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \\n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \\n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \\n What is the time-frame for each phase? \\n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", + "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \n Which actors are involved? \n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \n What is the time-frame for each phase? \n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -183612,14 +183612,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Linking health action to DDR and the peace process", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies?", + "Sentence": "\n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies?", "newParagraph": "key question preplanning assessment n key feature peace protocol n actor involved n many armed group force participated peace negotiation makeup term age sex n foreign troop eg foreign mercenary among n peace protocol require change administrative system country health system affected n role un play achieving peace accord agency deployed facilitate implementation different aspect n coordinate healthrelated aspect integrated interagency ddr effort ministry health medical service peacekeeping mission unfpa food agency n world food programme wfp implementing partner etc set un coordinating mechanism division responsibility etc n national steering bodiescommittees ddr planned joint commission transitional government national commission ddr working group etc n member mandate body n health sector represented body n assistance combatant set peace protocol plan made ddr n phase ddr process planned n timeframe phase n role canshould health sector play phase", "ProcessedSent": "n member mandate body", "SentID": 10200 }, { "ParagraphID": 2908, - "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \\n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \\n Which actors are involved? \\n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \\n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \\n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \\n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \\n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \\n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \\n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \\n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \\n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \\n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \\n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \\n What is the time-frame for each phase? \\n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", + "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \n Which actors are involved? \n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \n What is the time-frame for each phase? \n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -183630,14 +183630,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Linking health action to DDR and the peace process", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Is the health sector represented in such bodies?", + "Sentence": "\n Is the health sector represented in such bodies?", "newParagraph": "key question preplanning assessment n key feature peace protocol n actor involved n many armed group force participated peace negotiation makeup term age sex n foreign troop eg foreign mercenary among n peace protocol require change administrative system country health system affected n role un play achieving peace accord agency deployed facilitate implementation different aspect n coordinate healthrelated aspect integrated interagency ddr effort ministry health medical service peacekeeping mission unfpa food agency n world food programme wfp implementing partner etc set un coordinating mechanism division responsibility etc n national steering bodiescommittees ddr planned joint commission transitional government national commission ddr working group etc n member mandate body n health sector represented body n assistance combatant set peace protocol plan made ddr n phase ddr process planned n timeframe phase n role canshould health sector play phase", "ProcessedSent": "n health sector represented body", "SentID": 10201 }, { "ParagraphID": 2908, - "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \\n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \\n Which actors are involved? \\n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \\n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \\n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \\n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \\n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \\n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \\n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \\n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \\n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \\n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \\n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \\n What is the time-frame for each phase? \\n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", + "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \n Which actors are involved? \n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \n What is the time-frame for each phase? \n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -183655,7 +183655,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2908, - "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \\n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \\n Which actors are involved? \\n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \\n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \\n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \\n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \\n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \\n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \\n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \\n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \\n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \\n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \\n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \\n What is the time-frame for each phase? \\n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", + "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \n Which actors are involved? \n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \n What is the time-frame for each phase? \n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -183666,14 +183666,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Linking health action to DDR and the peace process", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR?", + "Sentence": "\n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR?", "newParagraph": "key question preplanning assessment n key feature peace protocol n actor involved n many armed group force participated peace negotiation makeup term age sex n foreign troop eg foreign mercenary among n peace protocol require change administrative system country health system affected n role un play achieving peace accord agency deployed facilitate implementation different aspect n coordinate healthrelated aspect integrated interagency ddr effort ministry health medical service peacekeeping mission unfpa food agency n world food programme wfp implementing partner etc set un coordinating mechanism division responsibility etc n national steering bodiescommittees ddr planned joint commission transitional government national commission ddr working group etc n member mandate body n health sector represented body n assistance combatant set peace protocol plan made ddr n phase ddr process planned n timeframe phase n role canshould health sector play phase", "ProcessedSent": "n assistance combatant set peace protocol plan made ddr", "SentID": 10203 }, { "ParagraphID": 2908, - "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \\n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \\n Which actors are involved? \\n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \\n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \\n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \\n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \\n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \\n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \\n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \\n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \\n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \\n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \\n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \\n What is the time-frame for each phase? \\n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", + "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \n Which actors are involved? \n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \n What is the time-frame for each phase? \n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -183684,14 +183684,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Linking health action to DDR and the peace process", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned?", + "Sentence": "\n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned?", "newParagraph": "key question preplanning assessment n key feature peace protocol n actor involved n many armed group force participated peace negotiation makeup term age sex n foreign troop eg foreign mercenary among n peace protocol require change administrative system country health system affected n role un play achieving peace accord agency deployed facilitate implementation different aspect n coordinate healthrelated aspect integrated interagency ddr effort ministry health medical service peacekeeping mission unfpa food agency n world food programme wfp implementing partner etc set un coordinating mechanism division responsibility etc n national steering bodiescommittees ddr planned joint commission transitional government national commission ddr working group etc n member mandate body n health sector represented body n assistance combatant set peace protocol plan made ddr n phase ddr process planned n timeframe phase n role canshould health sector play phase", "ProcessedSent": "n phase ddr process planned", "SentID": 10204 }, { "ParagraphID": 2908, - "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \\n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \\n Which actors are involved? \\n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \\n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \\n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \\n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \\n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \\n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \\n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \\n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \\n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \\n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \\n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \\n What is the time-frame for each phase? \\n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", + "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \n Which actors are involved? \n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \n What is the time-frame for each phase? \n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -183702,14 +183702,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Linking health action to DDR and the peace process", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What is the time-frame for each phase?", + "Sentence": "\n What is the time-frame for each phase?", "newParagraph": "key question preplanning assessment n key feature peace protocol n actor involved n many armed group force participated peace negotiation makeup term age sex n foreign troop eg foreign mercenary among n peace protocol require change administrative system country health system affected n role un play achieving peace accord agency deployed facilitate implementation different aspect n coordinate healthrelated aspect integrated interagency ddr effort ministry health medical service peacekeeping mission unfpa food agency n world food programme wfp implementing partner etc set un coordinating mechanism division responsibility etc n national steering bodiescommittees ddr planned joint commission transitional government national commission ddr working group etc n member mandate body n health sector represented body n assistance combatant set peace protocol plan made ddr n phase ddr process planned n timeframe phase n role canshould health sector play phase", "ProcessedSent": "n timeframe phase", "SentID": 10205 }, { "ParagraphID": 2908, - "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \\n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \\n Which actors are involved? \\n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \\n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \\n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \\n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \\n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \\n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \\n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \\n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \\n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \\n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \\n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \\n What is the time-frame for each phase? \\n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", + "Paragraph": "Key questions for the pre-planning assessment: \n What are the key features of the peace protocols? \n Which actors are involved? \n How many armed groups and forces have participated in the peace negotiation? What is their make-up in terms of age and sex? \n Are there any foreign troops (e.g., foreign mercenaries) among them? \n Does the peace protocol require a change in the administrative system of the country? Will the health system be affected by it? \n What role did the UN play in achieving the peace accord, and how will agencies be deployed to facilitate the implementation of its different aspects? \n Who will coordinate the health-related aspects of integrated, inter-agency DDR efforts (ministry of health, WHO, medical services of peacekeeping mission, UNFPA, food agencies such as the \n World Food Programme [WFP], implementing partners, etc.)? Who will set up the UN coordinating mechanism, division of responsibilities, etc., and when? \n What national steering bodies\/committees for DDR are planned (joint commission, transitional government, national commission on DDR, working groups, etc.)? \n Who are the members and what is the mandate of such bodies? \n Is the health sector represented in such bodies? Should it be? \n Is assistance to combatants set out in the peace protocol, and if so, what plans have been made for DDR? \n Which phases in the DDR process have been planned? \n What is the time-frame for each phase? \n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -183720,14 +183720,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Linking health action to DDR and the peace process", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", + "Sentence": "\n What role, if any, can\/should the health sector play in each phase?", "newParagraph": "key question preplanning assessment n key feature peace protocol n actor involved n many armed group force participated peace negotiation makeup term age sex n foreign troop eg foreign mercenary among n peace protocol require change administrative system country health system affected n role un play achieving peace accord agency deployed facilitate implementation different aspect n coordinate healthrelated aspect integrated interagency ddr effort ministry health medical service peacekeeping mission unfpa food agency n world food programme wfp implementing partner etc set un coordinating mechanism division responsibility etc n national steering bodiescommittees ddr planned joint commission transitional government national commission ddr working group etc n member mandate body n health sector represented body n assistance combatant set peace protocol plan made ddr n phase ddr process planned n timeframe phase n role canshould health sector play phase", "ProcessedSent": "n role canshould health sector play phase", "SentID": 10206 }, { "ParagraphID": 2909, - "Paragraph": "Second, the health sector should be represented in all bodies established to oversee DDR from the earliest stages of the process possible. Early inclusion is essential if the guiding principles described above are to be applied in practice during operations. In particular: \\n It can ensure that public health concerns are taken into account when key planning decisions are made, e.g., on the selection of locations for pick-up points or other assembly\/transit areas, on the level of services that will be established there, and on the best way of dealing with different health needs; \\n It can advocate in favour of vulnerable groups; \\n It will establish a political, legislative and administrative link with national authorities, which is necessary to create the space for health actions in the short and medium\/long term. For example, appropriate support for the health needs of specific groups, such as girl mothers or the war-disabled, can be provided only if the appropriate legislative\/ administrative frameworks have been set up and capacity-building begun; \\n It will reduce the risk of creating ad hoc health services for former combatants, women associated with armed groups and forces, dependants and the communities to which they return. Health programmes in support of a DDR process can be highly visible, but they are seldom more than a limited part of all the health-related activities taking place in a country during a transition period; \\n Careful cooperation with health and relevant non-health national authorities can result in the establishment of health programmes that start out in support of demobilization, but later, through coordination with the overall rehabilitation of the country strategy for the health sector, become a sustainable asset in the reintegration period and beyond; \\n It can bring about the adoption at national level of specific health guidelines\/protocols that are equitable, affordable by and accessible to all, and gender- and age-responsive.", + "Paragraph": "Second, the health sector should be represented in all bodies established to oversee DDR from the earliest stages of the process possible. Early inclusion is essential if the guiding principles described above are to be applied in practice during operations. In particular: \n It can ensure that public health concerns are taken into account when key planning decisions are made, e.g., on the selection of locations for pick-up points or other assembly\/transit areas, on the level of services that will be established there, and on the best way of dealing with different health needs; \n It can advocate in favour of vulnerable groups; \n It will establish a political, legislative and administrative link with national authorities, which is necessary to create the space for health actions in the short and medium\/long term. For example, appropriate support for the health needs of specific groups, such as girl mothers or the war-disabled, can be provided only if the appropriate legislative\/ administrative frameworks have been set up and capacity-building begun; \n It will reduce the risk of creating ad hoc health services for former combatants, women associated with armed groups and forces, dependants and the communities to which they return. Health programmes in support of a DDR process can be highly visible, but they are seldom more than a limited part of all the health-related activities taking place in a country during a transition period; \n Careful cooperation with health and relevant non-health national authorities can result in the establishment of health programmes that start out in support of demobilization, but later, through coordination with the overall rehabilitation of the country strategy for the health sector, become a sustainable asset in the reintegration period and beyond; \n It can bring about the adoption at national level of specific health guidelines\/protocols that are equitable, affordable by and accessible to all, and gender- and age-responsive.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -183745,7 +183745,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2909, - "Paragraph": "Second, the health sector should be represented in all bodies established to oversee DDR from the earliest stages of the process possible. Early inclusion is essential if the guiding principles described above are to be applied in practice during operations. In particular: \\n It can ensure that public health concerns are taken into account when key planning decisions are made, e.g., on the selection of locations for pick-up points or other assembly\/transit areas, on the level of services that will be established there, and on the best way of dealing with different health needs; \\n It can advocate in favour of vulnerable groups; \\n It will establish a political, legislative and administrative link with national authorities, which is necessary to create the space for health actions in the short and medium\/long term. For example, appropriate support for the health needs of specific groups, such as girl mothers or the war-disabled, can be provided only if the appropriate legislative\/ administrative frameworks have been set up and capacity-building begun; \\n It will reduce the risk of creating ad hoc health services for former combatants, women associated with armed groups and forces, dependants and the communities to which they return. Health programmes in support of a DDR process can be highly visible, but they are seldom more than a limited part of all the health-related activities taking place in a country during a transition period; \\n Careful cooperation with health and relevant non-health national authorities can result in the establishment of health programmes that start out in support of demobilization, but later, through coordination with the overall rehabilitation of the country strategy for the health sector, become a sustainable asset in the reintegration period and beyond; \\n It can bring about the adoption at national level of specific health guidelines\/protocols that are equitable, affordable by and accessible to all, and gender- and age-responsive.", + "Paragraph": "Second, the health sector should be represented in all bodies established to oversee DDR from the earliest stages of the process possible. Early inclusion is essential if the guiding principles described above are to be applied in practice during operations. In particular: \n It can ensure that public health concerns are taken into account when key planning decisions are made, e.g., on the selection of locations for pick-up points or other assembly\/transit areas, on the level of services that will be established there, and on the best way of dealing with different health needs; \n It can advocate in favour of vulnerable groups; \n It will establish a political, legislative and administrative link with national authorities, which is necessary to create the space for health actions in the short and medium\/long term. For example, appropriate support for the health needs of specific groups, such as girl mothers or the war-disabled, can be provided only if the appropriate legislative\/ administrative frameworks have been set up and capacity-building begun; \n It will reduce the risk of creating ad hoc health services for former combatants, women associated with armed groups and forces, dependants and the communities to which they return. Health programmes in support of a DDR process can be highly visible, but they are seldom more than a limited part of all the health-related activities taking place in a country during a transition period; \n Careful cooperation with health and relevant non-health national authorities can result in the establishment of health programmes that start out in support of demobilization, but later, through coordination with the overall rehabilitation of the country strategy for the health sector, become a sustainable asset in the reintegration period and beyond; \n It can bring about the adoption at national level of specific health guidelines\/protocols that are equitable, affordable by and accessible to all, and gender- and age-responsive.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -183763,7 +183763,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2909, - "Paragraph": "Second, the health sector should be represented in all bodies established to oversee DDR from the earliest stages of the process possible. Early inclusion is essential if the guiding principles described above are to be applied in practice during operations. In particular: \\n It can ensure that public health concerns are taken into account when key planning decisions are made, e.g., on the selection of locations for pick-up points or other assembly\/transit areas, on the level of services that will be established there, and on the best way of dealing with different health needs; \\n It can advocate in favour of vulnerable groups; \\n It will establish a political, legislative and administrative link with national authorities, which is necessary to create the space for health actions in the short and medium\/long term. For example, appropriate support for the health needs of specific groups, such as girl mothers or the war-disabled, can be provided only if the appropriate legislative\/ administrative frameworks have been set up and capacity-building begun; \\n It will reduce the risk of creating ad hoc health services for former combatants, women associated with armed groups and forces, dependants and the communities to which they return. Health programmes in support of a DDR process can be highly visible, but they are seldom more than a limited part of all the health-related activities taking place in a country during a transition period; \\n Careful cooperation with health and relevant non-health national authorities can result in the establishment of health programmes that start out in support of demobilization, but later, through coordination with the overall rehabilitation of the country strategy for the health sector, become a sustainable asset in the reintegration period and beyond; \\n It can bring about the adoption at national level of specific health guidelines\/protocols that are equitable, affordable by and accessible to all, and gender- and age-responsive.", + "Paragraph": "Second, the health sector should be represented in all bodies established to oversee DDR from the earliest stages of the process possible. Early inclusion is essential if the guiding principles described above are to be applied in practice during operations. In particular: \n It can ensure that public health concerns are taken into account when key planning decisions are made, e.g., on the selection of locations for pick-up points or other assembly\/transit areas, on the level of services that will be established there, and on the best way of dealing with different health needs; \n It can advocate in favour of vulnerable groups; \n It will establish a political, legislative and administrative link with national authorities, which is necessary to create the space for health actions in the short and medium\/long term. For example, appropriate support for the health needs of specific groups, such as girl mothers or the war-disabled, can be provided only if the appropriate legislative\/ administrative frameworks have been set up and capacity-building begun; \n It will reduce the risk of creating ad hoc health services for former combatants, women associated with armed groups and forces, dependants and the communities to which they return. Health programmes in support of a DDR process can be highly visible, but they are seldom more than a limited part of all the health-related activities taking place in a country during a transition period; \n Careful cooperation with health and relevant non-health national authorities can result in the establishment of health programmes that start out in support of demobilization, but later, through coordination with the overall rehabilitation of the country strategy for the health sector, become a sustainable asset in the reintegration period and beyond; \n It can bring about the adoption at national level of specific health guidelines\/protocols that are equitable, affordable by and accessible to all, and gender- and age-responsive.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -183774,14 +183774,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Linking health action to DDR and the peace process", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "In particular: \\n It can ensure that public health concerns are taken into account when key planning decisions are made, e.g., on the selection of locations for pick-up points or other assembly\/transit areas, on the level of services that will be established there, and on the best way of dealing with different health needs; \\n It can advocate in favour of vulnerable groups; \\n It will establish a political, legislative and administrative link with national authorities, which is necessary to create the space for health actions in the short and medium\/long term.", + "Sentence": "In particular: \n It can ensure that public health concerns are taken into account when key planning decisions are made, e.g., on the selection of locations for pick-up points or other assembly\/transit areas, on the level of services that will be established there, and on the best way of dealing with different health needs; \n It can advocate in favour of vulnerable groups; \n It will establish a political, legislative and administrative link with national authorities, which is necessary to create the space for health actions in the short and medium\/long term.", "newParagraph": "second health sector represented body established oversee ddr earliest stage process possible early inclusion essential guiding principle described applied practice operation particular n ensure public health concern taken account key planning decision made eg selection location pickup point assemblytransit area level service established best way dealing different health need n advocate favour vulnerable group n establish political legislative administrative link national authority necessary create space health action short mediumlong term example appropriate support health need specific group girl mother wardisabled provided appropriate legislative administrative framework set capacitybuilding begun n reduce risk creating ad hoc health service former combatant woman associated armed group force dependant community return health programme support ddr process highly visible seldom limited part healthrelated activity taking place country transition period n careful cooperation health relevant nonhealth national authority result establishment health programme start support demobilization later coordination overall rehabilitation country strategy health sector become sustainable asset reintegration period beyond n bring adoption national level specific health guidelinesprotocols equitable affordable accessible gender ageresponsive", "ProcessedSent": "particular n ensure public health concern taken account key planning decision made eg selection location pickup point assemblytransit area level service established best way dealing different health need n advocate favour vulnerable group n establish political legislative administrative link national authority necessary create space health action short mediumlong term", "SentID": 10209 }, { "ParagraphID": 2909, - "Paragraph": "Second, the health sector should be represented in all bodies established to oversee DDR from the earliest stages of the process possible. Early inclusion is essential if the guiding principles described above are to be applied in practice during operations. In particular: \\n It can ensure that public health concerns are taken into account when key planning decisions are made, e.g., on the selection of locations for pick-up points or other assembly\/transit areas, on the level of services that will be established there, and on the best way of dealing with different health needs; \\n It can advocate in favour of vulnerable groups; \\n It will establish a political, legislative and administrative link with national authorities, which is necessary to create the space for health actions in the short and medium\/long term. For example, appropriate support for the health needs of specific groups, such as girl mothers or the war-disabled, can be provided only if the appropriate legislative\/ administrative frameworks have been set up and capacity-building begun; \\n It will reduce the risk of creating ad hoc health services for former combatants, women associated with armed groups and forces, dependants and the communities to which they return. Health programmes in support of a DDR process can be highly visible, but they are seldom more than a limited part of all the health-related activities taking place in a country during a transition period; \\n Careful cooperation with health and relevant non-health national authorities can result in the establishment of health programmes that start out in support of demobilization, but later, through coordination with the overall rehabilitation of the country strategy for the health sector, become a sustainable asset in the reintegration period and beyond; \\n It can bring about the adoption at national level of specific health guidelines\/protocols that are equitable, affordable by and accessible to all, and gender- and age-responsive.", + "Paragraph": "Second, the health sector should be represented in all bodies established to oversee DDR from the earliest stages of the process possible. Early inclusion is essential if the guiding principles described above are to be applied in practice during operations. In particular: \n It can ensure that public health concerns are taken into account when key planning decisions are made, e.g., on the selection of locations for pick-up points or other assembly\/transit areas, on the level of services that will be established there, and on the best way of dealing with different health needs; \n It can advocate in favour of vulnerable groups; \n It will establish a political, legislative and administrative link with national authorities, which is necessary to create the space for health actions in the short and medium\/long term. For example, appropriate support for the health needs of specific groups, such as girl mothers or the war-disabled, can be provided only if the appropriate legislative\/ administrative frameworks have been set up and capacity-building begun; \n It will reduce the risk of creating ad hoc health services for former combatants, women associated with armed groups and forces, dependants and the communities to which they return. Health programmes in support of a DDR process can be highly visible, but they are seldom more than a limited part of all the health-related activities taking place in a country during a transition period; \n Careful cooperation with health and relevant non-health national authorities can result in the establishment of health programmes that start out in support of demobilization, but later, through coordination with the overall rehabilitation of the country strategy for the health sector, become a sustainable asset in the reintegration period and beyond; \n It can bring about the adoption at national level of specific health guidelines\/protocols that are equitable, affordable by and accessible to all, and gender- and age-responsive.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -183792,14 +183792,14 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Linking health action to DDR and the peace process", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "For example, appropriate support for the health needs of specific groups, such as girl mothers or the war-disabled, can be provided only if the appropriate legislative\/ administrative frameworks have been set up and capacity-building begun; \\n It will reduce the risk of creating ad hoc health services for former combatants, women associated with armed groups and forces, dependants and the communities to which they return.", + "Sentence": "For example, appropriate support for the health needs of specific groups, such as girl mothers or the war-disabled, can be provided only if the appropriate legislative\/ administrative frameworks have been set up and capacity-building begun; \n It will reduce the risk of creating ad hoc health services for former combatants, women associated with armed groups and forces, dependants and the communities to which they return.", "newParagraph": "second health sector represented body established oversee ddr earliest stage process possible early inclusion essential guiding principle described applied practice operation particular n ensure public health concern taken account key planning decision made eg selection location pickup point assemblytransit area level service established best way dealing different health need n advocate favour vulnerable group n establish political legislative administrative link national authority necessary create space health action short mediumlong term example appropriate support health need specific group girl mother wardisabled provided appropriate legislative administrative framework set capacitybuilding begun n reduce risk creating ad hoc health service former combatant woman associated armed group force dependant community return health programme support ddr process highly visible seldom limited part healthrelated activity taking place country transition period n careful cooperation health relevant nonhealth national authority result establishment health programme start support demobilization later coordination overall rehabilitation country strategy health sector become sustainable asset reintegration period beyond n bring adoption national level specific health guidelinesprotocols equitable affordable accessible gender ageresponsive", "ProcessedSent": "example appropriate support health need specific group girl mother wardisabled provided appropriate legislative administrative framework set capacitybuilding begun n reduce risk creating ad hoc health service former combatant woman associated armed group force dependant community return", "SentID": 10210 }, { "ParagraphID": 2909, - "Paragraph": "Second, the health sector should be represented in all bodies established to oversee DDR from the earliest stages of the process possible. Early inclusion is essential if the guiding principles described above are to be applied in practice during operations. In particular: \\n It can ensure that public health concerns are taken into account when key planning decisions are made, e.g., on the selection of locations for pick-up points or other assembly\/transit areas, on the level of services that will be established there, and on the best way of dealing with different health needs; \\n It can advocate in favour of vulnerable groups; \\n It will establish a political, legislative and administrative link with national authorities, which is necessary to create the space for health actions in the short and medium\/long term. For example, appropriate support for the health needs of specific groups, such as girl mothers or the war-disabled, can be provided only if the appropriate legislative\/ administrative frameworks have been set up and capacity-building begun; \\n It will reduce the risk of creating ad hoc health services for former combatants, women associated with armed groups and forces, dependants and the communities to which they return. Health programmes in support of a DDR process can be highly visible, but they are seldom more than a limited part of all the health-related activities taking place in a country during a transition period; \\n Careful cooperation with health and relevant non-health national authorities can result in the establishment of health programmes that start out in support of demobilization, but later, through coordination with the overall rehabilitation of the country strategy for the health sector, become a sustainable asset in the reintegration period and beyond; \\n It can bring about the adoption at national level of specific health guidelines\/protocols that are equitable, affordable by and accessible to all, and gender- and age-responsive.", + "Paragraph": "Second, the health sector should be represented in all bodies established to oversee DDR from the earliest stages of the process possible. Early inclusion is essential if the guiding principles described above are to be applied in practice during operations. In particular: \n It can ensure that public health concerns are taken into account when key planning decisions are made, e.g., on the selection of locations for pick-up points or other assembly\/transit areas, on the level of services that will be established there, and on the best way of dealing with different health needs; \n It can advocate in favour of vulnerable groups; \n It will establish a political, legislative and administrative link with national authorities, which is necessary to create the space for health actions in the short and medium\/long term. For example, appropriate support for the health needs of specific groups, such as girl mothers or the war-disabled, can be provided only if the appropriate legislative\/ administrative frameworks have been set up and capacity-building begun; \n It will reduce the risk of creating ad hoc health services for former combatants, women associated with armed groups and forces, dependants and the communities to which they return. Health programmes in support of a DDR process can be highly visible, but they are seldom more than a limited part of all the health-related activities taking place in a country during a transition period; \n Careful cooperation with health and relevant non-health national authorities can result in the establishment of health programmes that start out in support of demobilization, but later, through coordination with the overall rehabilitation of the country strategy for the health sector, become a sustainable asset in the reintegration period and beyond; \n It can bring about the adoption at national level of specific health guidelines\/protocols that are equitable, affordable by and accessible to all, and gender- and age-responsive.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -183810,7 +183810,7 @@ "Heading2": "5.2. Linking health action to DDR and the peace process", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Health programmes in support of a DDR process can be highly visible, but they are seldom more than a limited part of all the health-related activities taking place in a country during a transition period; \\n Careful cooperation with health and relevant non-health national authorities can result in the establishment of health programmes that start out in support of demobilization, but later, through coordination with the overall rehabilitation of the country strategy for the health sector, become a sustainable asset in the reintegration period and beyond; \\n It can bring about the adoption at national level of specific health guidelines\/protocols that are equitable, affordable by and accessible to all, and gender- and age-responsive.", + "Sentence": "Health programmes in support of a DDR process can be highly visible, but they are seldom more than a limited part of all the health-related activities taking place in a country during a transition period; \n Careful cooperation with health and relevant non-health national authorities can result in the establishment of health programmes that start out in support of demobilization, but later, through coordination with the overall rehabilitation of the country strategy for the health sector, become a sustainable asset in the reintegration period and beyond; \n It can bring about the adoption at national level of specific health guidelines\/protocols that are equitable, affordable by and accessible to all, and gender- and age-responsive.", "newParagraph": "second health sector represented body established oversee ddr earliest stage process possible early inclusion essential guiding principle described applied practice operation particular n ensure public health concern taken account key planning decision made eg selection location pickup point assemblytransit area level service established best way dealing different health need n advocate favour vulnerable group n establish political legislative administrative link national authority necessary create space health action short mediumlong term example appropriate support health need specific group girl mother wardisabled provided appropriate legislative administrative framework set capacitybuilding begun n reduce risk creating ad hoc health service former combatant woman associated armed group force dependant community return health programme support ddr process highly visible seldom limited part healthrelated activity taking place country transition period n careful cooperation health relevant nonhealth national authority result establishment health programme start support demobilization later coordination overall rehabilitation country strategy health sector become sustainable asset reintegration period beyond n bring adoption national level specific health guidelinesprotocols equitable affordable accessible gender ageresponsive", "ProcessedSent": "health programme support ddr process highly visible seldom limited part healthrelated activity taking place country transition period n careful cooperation health relevant nonhealth national authority result establishment health programme start support demobilization later coordination overall rehabilitation country strategy health sector become sustainable asset reintegration period beyond n bring adoption national level specific health guidelinesprotocols equitable affordable accessible gender ageresponsive", "SentID": 10211 @@ -184123,7 +184123,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2917, - "Paragraph": "The overall goal of health action is to reduce avoidable illness and death. In the context of DDR, this requires that the health programmes focus on providing: \\n basic, preventive and curative, specifically designed and good-quality health care that is easily accessible at every stage of the process \u2014 in any transit stations, in demobili- zation\/cantonment\/assembly camps if they are used, in ICCs for children, and in the communities where combatants will live once they are demobilized; \\n basic health care, including reproductive health care and psychosocial care, that is appropriate to the different needs of men, women, youth, girls and boys going through DDR. This service needs to be supported by effective referral systems and emergency back-up systems, e.g., to control outbreaks of infectious diseases or deal with immediate, life-threatening mental trauma. Health information and advice must be made available in language that can be understood by the different groups for which the health care is designed; \\n training of camp managers on health-related matters, e.g., on the construction of appro- priate areas for the registration and protection of vulnerable groups, the provision of food appropriate to different needs (e.g., for the sick, and for nursing mothers, infants and small children), problems with drug and alcohol addiction, water, shelter, sanita- tion, supplies of items needed for hygiene (soap, buckets), and fuel. Women and girls will need specific assistance to meet their hygiene needs, including menstrual supplies and clean birthing kits.", + "Paragraph": "The overall goal of health action is to reduce avoidable illness and death. In the context of DDR, this requires that the health programmes focus on providing: \n basic, preventive and curative, specifically designed and good-quality health care that is easily accessible at every stage of the process \u2014 in any transit stations, in demobili- zation\/cantonment\/assembly camps if they are used, in ICCs for children, and in the communities where combatants will live once they are demobilized; \n basic health care, including reproductive health care and psychosocial care, that is appropriate to the different needs of men, women, youth, girls and boys going through DDR. This service needs to be supported by effective referral systems and emergency back-up systems, e.g., to control outbreaks of infectious diseases or deal with immediate, life-threatening mental trauma. Health information and advice must be made available in language that can be understood by the different groups for which the health care is designed; \n training of camp managers on health-related matters, e.g., on the construction of appro- priate areas for the registration and protection of vulnerable groups, the provision of food appropriate to different needs (e.g., for the sick, and for nursing mothers, infants and small children), problems with drug and alcohol addiction, water, shelter, sanita- tion, supplies of items needed for hygiene (soap, buckets), and fuel. Women and girls will need specific assistance to meet their hygiene needs, including menstrual supplies and clean birthing kits.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -184141,7 +184141,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2917, - "Paragraph": "The overall goal of health action is to reduce avoidable illness and death. In the context of DDR, this requires that the health programmes focus on providing: \\n basic, preventive and curative, specifically designed and good-quality health care that is easily accessible at every stage of the process \u2014 in any transit stations, in demobili- zation\/cantonment\/assembly camps if they are used, in ICCs for children, and in the communities where combatants will live once they are demobilized; \\n basic health care, including reproductive health care and psychosocial care, that is appropriate to the different needs of men, women, youth, girls and boys going through DDR. This service needs to be supported by effective referral systems and emergency back-up systems, e.g., to control outbreaks of infectious diseases or deal with immediate, life-threatening mental trauma. Health information and advice must be made available in language that can be understood by the different groups for which the health care is designed; \\n training of camp managers on health-related matters, e.g., on the construction of appro- priate areas for the registration and protection of vulnerable groups, the provision of food appropriate to different needs (e.g., for the sick, and for nursing mothers, infants and small children), problems with drug and alcohol addiction, water, shelter, sanita- tion, supplies of items needed for hygiene (soap, buckets), and fuel. Women and girls will need specific assistance to meet their hygiene needs, including menstrual supplies and clean birthing kits.", + "Paragraph": "The overall goal of health action is to reduce avoidable illness and death. In the context of DDR, this requires that the health programmes focus on providing: \n basic, preventive and curative, specifically designed and good-quality health care that is easily accessible at every stage of the process \u2014 in any transit stations, in demobili- zation\/cantonment\/assembly camps if they are used, in ICCs for children, and in the communities where combatants will live once they are demobilized; \n basic health care, including reproductive health care and psychosocial care, that is appropriate to the different needs of men, women, youth, girls and boys going through DDR. This service needs to be supported by effective referral systems and emergency back-up systems, e.g., to control outbreaks of infectious diseases or deal with immediate, life-threatening mental trauma. Health information and advice must be made available in language that can be understood by the different groups for which the health care is designed; \n training of camp managers on health-related matters, e.g., on the construction of appro- priate areas for the registration and protection of vulnerable groups, the provision of food appropriate to different needs (e.g., for the sick, and for nursing mothers, infants and small children), problems with drug and alcohol addiction, water, shelter, sanita- tion, supplies of items needed for hygiene (soap, buckets), and fuel. Women and girls will need specific assistance to meet their hygiene needs, including menstrual supplies and clean birthing kits.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -184152,14 +184152,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "In the context of DDR, this requires that the health programmes focus on providing: \\n basic, preventive and curative, specifically designed and good-quality health care that is easily accessible at every stage of the process \u2014 in any transit stations, in demobili- zation\/cantonment\/assembly camps if they are used, in ICCs for children, and in the communities where combatants will live once they are demobilized; \\n basic health care, including reproductive health care and psychosocial care, that is appropriate to the different needs of men, women, youth, girls and boys going through DDR.", + "Sentence": "In the context of DDR, this requires that the health programmes focus on providing: \n basic, preventive and curative, specifically designed and good-quality health care that is easily accessible at every stage of the process \u2014 in any transit stations, in demobili- zation\/cantonment\/assembly camps if they are used, in ICCs for children, and in the communities where combatants will live once they are demobilized; \n basic health care, including reproductive health care and psychosocial care, that is appropriate to the different needs of men, women, youth, girls and boys going through DDR.", "newParagraph": "overall goal health action reduce avoidable illness death context ddr requires health programme focus providing n basic preventive curative specifically designed goodquality health care easily accessible every stage process transit station demobili zationcantonmentassembly camp used icc child community combatant live demobilized n basic health care including reproductive health care psychosocial care appropriate different need men woman youth girl boy going ddr service need supported effective referral system emergency backup system eg control outbreak infectious disease deal immediate lifethreatening mental trauma health information advice must made available language understood different group health care designed n training camp manager healthrelated matter eg construction appro priate area registration protection vulnerable group provision food appropriate different need eg sick nursing mother infant small child problem drug alcohol addiction water shelter sanita tion supply item needed hygiene soap bucket fuel woman girl need specific assistance meet hygiene need including menstrual supply clean birthing kit", "ProcessedSent": "context ddr requires health programme focus providing n basic preventive curative specifically designed goodquality health care easily accessible every stage process transit station demobili zationcantonmentassembly camp used icc child community combatant live demobilized n basic health care including reproductive health care psychosocial care appropriate different need men woman youth girl boy going ddr", "SentID": 10230 }, { "ParagraphID": 2917, - "Paragraph": "The overall goal of health action is to reduce avoidable illness and death. In the context of DDR, this requires that the health programmes focus on providing: \\n basic, preventive and curative, specifically designed and good-quality health care that is easily accessible at every stage of the process \u2014 in any transit stations, in demobili- zation\/cantonment\/assembly camps if they are used, in ICCs for children, and in the communities where combatants will live once they are demobilized; \\n basic health care, including reproductive health care and psychosocial care, that is appropriate to the different needs of men, women, youth, girls and boys going through DDR. This service needs to be supported by effective referral systems and emergency back-up systems, e.g., to control outbreaks of infectious diseases or deal with immediate, life-threatening mental trauma. Health information and advice must be made available in language that can be understood by the different groups for which the health care is designed; \\n training of camp managers on health-related matters, e.g., on the construction of appro- priate areas for the registration and protection of vulnerable groups, the provision of food appropriate to different needs (e.g., for the sick, and for nursing mothers, infants and small children), problems with drug and alcohol addiction, water, shelter, sanita- tion, supplies of items needed for hygiene (soap, buckets), and fuel. Women and girls will need specific assistance to meet their hygiene needs, including menstrual supplies and clean birthing kits.", + "Paragraph": "The overall goal of health action is to reduce avoidable illness and death. In the context of DDR, this requires that the health programmes focus on providing: \n basic, preventive and curative, specifically designed and good-quality health care that is easily accessible at every stage of the process \u2014 in any transit stations, in demobili- zation\/cantonment\/assembly camps if they are used, in ICCs for children, and in the communities where combatants will live once they are demobilized; \n basic health care, including reproductive health care and psychosocial care, that is appropriate to the different needs of men, women, youth, girls and boys going through DDR. This service needs to be supported by effective referral systems and emergency back-up systems, e.g., to control outbreaks of infectious diseases or deal with immediate, life-threatening mental trauma. Health information and advice must be made available in language that can be understood by the different groups for which the health care is designed; \n training of camp managers on health-related matters, e.g., on the construction of appro- priate areas for the registration and protection of vulnerable groups, the provision of food appropriate to different needs (e.g., for the sick, and for nursing mothers, infants and small children), problems with drug and alcohol addiction, water, shelter, sanita- tion, supplies of items needed for hygiene (soap, buckets), and fuel. Women and girls will need specific assistance to meet their hygiene needs, including menstrual supplies and clean birthing kits.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -184177,7 +184177,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2917, - "Paragraph": "The overall goal of health action is to reduce avoidable illness and death. In the context of DDR, this requires that the health programmes focus on providing: \\n basic, preventive and curative, specifically designed and good-quality health care that is easily accessible at every stage of the process \u2014 in any transit stations, in demobili- zation\/cantonment\/assembly camps if they are used, in ICCs for children, and in the communities where combatants will live once they are demobilized; \\n basic health care, including reproductive health care and psychosocial care, that is appropriate to the different needs of men, women, youth, girls and boys going through DDR. This service needs to be supported by effective referral systems and emergency back-up systems, e.g., to control outbreaks of infectious diseases or deal with immediate, life-threatening mental trauma. Health information and advice must be made available in language that can be understood by the different groups for which the health care is designed; \\n training of camp managers on health-related matters, e.g., on the construction of appro- priate areas for the registration and protection of vulnerable groups, the provision of food appropriate to different needs (e.g., for the sick, and for nursing mothers, infants and small children), problems with drug and alcohol addiction, water, shelter, sanita- tion, supplies of items needed for hygiene (soap, buckets), and fuel. Women and girls will need specific assistance to meet their hygiene needs, including menstrual supplies and clean birthing kits.", + "Paragraph": "The overall goal of health action is to reduce avoidable illness and death. In the context of DDR, this requires that the health programmes focus on providing: \n basic, preventive and curative, specifically designed and good-quality health care that is easily accessible at every stage of the process \u2014 in any transit stations, in demobili- zation\/cantonment\/assembly camps if they are used, in ICCs for children, and in the communities where combatants will live once they are demobilized; \n basic health care, including reproductive health care and psychosocial care, that is appropriate to the different needs of men, women, youth, girls and boys going through DDR. This service needs to be supported by effective referral systems and emergency back-up systems, e.g., to control outbreaks of infectious diseases or deal with immediate, life-threatening mental trauma. Health information and advice must be made available in language that can be understood by the different groups for which the health care is designed; \n training of camp managers on health-related matters, e.g., on the construction of appro- priate areas for the registration and protection of vulnerable groups, the provision of food appropriate to different needs (e.g., for the sick, and for nursing mothers, infants and small children), problems with drug and alcohol addiction, water, shelter, sanita- tion, supplies of items needed for hygiene (soap, buckets), and fuel. Women and girls will need specific assistance to meet their hygiene needs, including menstrual supplies and clean birthing kits.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -184188,14 +184188,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Health information and advice must be made available in language that can be understood by the different groups for which the health care is designed; \\n training of camp managers on health-related matters, e.g., on the construction of appro- priate areas for the registration and protection of vulnerable groups, the provision of food appropriate to different needs (e.g., for the sick, and for nursing mothers, infants and small children), problems with drug and alcohol addiction, water, shelter, sanita- tion, supplies of items needed for hygiene (soap, buckets), and fuel.", + "Sentence": "Health information and advice must be made available in language that can be understood by the different groups for which the health care is designed; \n training of camp managers on health-related matters, e.g., on the construction of appro- priate areas for the registration and protection of vulnerable groups, the provision of food appropriate to different needs (e.g., for the sick, and for nursing mothers, infants and small children), problems with drug and alcohol addiction, water, shelter, sanita- tion, supplies of items needed for hygiene (soap, buckets), and fuel.", "newParagraph": "overall goal health action reduce avoidable illness death context ddr requires health programme focus providing n basic preventive curative specifically designed goodquality health care easily accessible every stage process transit station demobili zationcantonmentassembly camp used icc child community combatant live demobilized n basic health care including reproductive health care psychosocial care appropriate different need men woman youth girl boy going ddr service need supported effective referral system emergency backup system eg control outbreak infectious disease deal immediate lifethreatening mental trauma health information advice must made available language understood different group health care designed n training camp manager healthrelated matter eg construction appro priate area registration protection vulnerable group provision food appropriate different need eg sick nursing mother infant small child problem drug alcohol addiction water shelter sanita tion supply item needed hygiene soap bucket fuel woman girl need specific assistance meet hygiene need including menstrual supply clean birthing kit", "ProcessedSent": "health information advice must made available language understood different group health care designed n training camp manager healthrelated matter eg construction appro priate area registration protection vulnerable group provision food appropriate different need eg sick nursing mother infant small child problem drug alcohol addiction water shelter sanita tion supply item needed hygiene soap bucket fuel", "SentID": 10232 }, { "ParagraphID": 2917, - "Paragraph": "The overall goal of health action is to reduce avoidable illness and death. In the context of DDR, this requires that the health programmes focus on providing: \\n basic, preventive and curative, specifically designed and good-quality health care that is easily accessible at every stage of the process \u2014 in any transit stations, in demobili- zation\/cantonment\/assembly camps if they are used, in ICCs for children, and in the communities where combatants will live once they are demobilized; \\n basic health care, including reproductive health care and psychosocial care, that is appropriate to the different needs of men, women, youth, girls and boys going through DDR. This service needs to be supported by effective referral systems and emergency back-up systems, e.g., to control outbreaks of infectious diseases or deal with immediate, life-threatening mental trauma. Health information and advice must be made available in language that can be understood by the different groups for which the health care is designed; \\n training of camp managers on health-related matters, e.g., on the construction of appro- priate areas for the registration and protection of vulnerable groups, the provision of food appropriate to different needs (e.g., for the sick, and for nursing mothers, infants and small children), problems with drug and alcohol addiction, water, shelter, sanita- tion, supplies of items needed for hygiene (soap, buckets), and fuel. Women and girls will need specific assistance to meet their hygiene needs, including menstrual supplies and clean birthing kits.", + "Paragraph": "The overall goal of health action is to reduce avoidable illness and death. In the context of DDR, this requires that the health programmes focus on providing: \n basic, preventive and curative, specifically designed and good-quality health care that is easily accessible at every stage of the process \u2014 in any transit stations, in demobili- zation\/cantonment\/assembly camps if they are used, in ICCs for children, and in the communities where combatants will live once they are demobilized; \n basic health care, including reproductive health care and psychosocial care, that is appropriate to the different needs of men, women, youth, girls and boys going through DDR. This service needs to be supported by effective referral systems and emergency back-up systems, e.g., to control outbreaks of infectious diseases or deal with immediate, life-threatening mental trauma. Health information and advice must be made available in language that can be understood by the different groups for which the health care is designed; \n training of camp managers on health-related matters, e.g., on the construction of appro- priate areas for the registration and protection of vulnerable groups, the provision of food appropriate to different needs (e.g., for the sick, and for nursing mothers, infants and small children), problems with drug and alcohol addiction, water, shelter, sanita- tion, supplies of items needed for hygiene (soap, buckets), and fuel. Women and girls will need specific assistance to meet their hygiene needs, including menstrual supplies and clean birthing kits.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -184357,7 +184357,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2921, - "Paragraph": "Assess the risks and plan accordingly.5 Information that will be needed includes: \\n the composition of target population (age and sex) and their general health status; \\n the transit sites and the health care situation there; \\n the places to which former combatants and the people associated with them will return and the capacity to supply health services there.", + "Paragraph": "Assess the risks and plan accordingly.5 Information that will be needed includes: \n the composition of target population (age and sex) and their general health status; \n the transit sites and the health care situation there; \n the places to which former combatants and the people associated with them will return and the capacity to supply health services there.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -184368,14 +184368,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1. Assessing epidemiological profiles", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Assess the risks and plan accordingly.5 Information that will be needed includes: \\n the composition of target population (age and sex) and their general health status; \\n the transit sites and the health care situation there; \\n the places to which former combatants and the people associated with them will return and the capacity to supply health services there.", + "Sentence": "Assess the risks and plan accordingly.5 Information that will be needed includes: \n the composition of target population (age and sex) and their general health status; \n the transit sites and the health care situation there; \n the places to which former combatants and the people associated with them will return and the capacity to supply health services there.", "newParagraph": "ass risk plan accordingly5 information needed includes n composition target population age sex general health status n transit site health care situation n place former combatant people associated return capacity supply health service", "ProcessedSent": "ass risk plan accordingly5 information needed includes n composition target population age sex general health status n transit site health care situation n place former combatant people associated return capacity supply health service", "SentID": 10242 }, { "ParagraphID": 2922, - "Paragraph": "ore detailed and updated information may be available from NGOs working in the area or the health services of the armed forces or groups. If possible, it should come from field assessments or rapid surveys.6 The following guiding questions should be asked: \\n What kinds of population movements are expected during the DDR process (not only movements of people associated with armed forces and groups, but also an idea of where populations of refugees and internally displaced persons might intersect\/interact with them in some way)? \\n What are the most prevalent health hazards (e.g., endemic diseases, history of epidem- ics) in the areas of origin, transit and destination? \\n What is the size of groups (women combatants and associates, child soldiers, disabled people, etc.) with specific health needs? \\n Are there specific health concerns relating to military personnel, as opposed to the civil- ian population?", + "Paragraph": "ore detailed and updated information may be available from NGOs working in the area or the health services of the armed forces or groups. If possible, it should come from field assessments or rapid surveys.6 The following guiding questions should be asked: \n What kinds of population movements are expected during the DDR process (not only movements of people associated with armed forces and groups, but also an idea of where populations of refugees and internally displaced persons might intersect\/interact with them in some way)? \n What are the most prevalent health hazards (e.g., endemic diseases, history of epidem- ics) in the areas of origin, transit and destination? \n What is the size of groups (women combatants and associates, child soldiers, disabled people, etc.) with specific health needs? \n Are there specific health concerns relating to military personnel, as opposed to the civil- ian population?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -184393,7 +184393,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2922, - "Paragraph": "ore detailed and updated information may be available from NGOs working in the area or the health services of the armed forces or groups. If possible, it should come from field assessments or rapid surveys.6 The following guiding questions should be asked: \\n What kinds of population movements are expected during the DDR process (not only movements of people associated with armed forces and groups, but also an idea of where populations of refugees and internally displaced persons might intersect\/interact with them in some way)? \\n What are the most prevalent health hazards (e.g., endemic diseases, history of epidem- ics) in the areas of origin, transit and destination? \\n What is the size of groups (women combatants and associates, child soldiers, disabled people, etc.) with specific health needs? \\n Are there specific health concerns relating to military personnel, as opposed to the civil- ian population?", + "Paragraph": "ore detailed and updated information may be available from NGOs working in the area or the health services of the armed forces or groups. If possible, it should come from field assessments or rapid surveys.6 The following guiding questions should be asked: \n What kinds of population movements are expected during the DDR process (not only movements of people associated with armed forces and groups, but also an idea of where populations of refugees and internally displaced persons might intersect\/interact with them in some way)? \n What are the most prevalent health hazards (e.g., endemic diseases, history of epidem- ics) in the areas of origin, transit and destination? \n What is the size of groups (women combatants and associates, child soldiers, disabled people, etc.) with specific health needs? \n Are there specific health concerns relating to military personnel, as opposed to the civil- ian population?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -184404,14 +184404,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1. Assessing epidemiological profiles", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "If possible, it should come from field assessments or rapid surveys.6 The following guiding questions should be asked: \\n What kinds of population movements are expected during the DDR process (not only movements of people associated with armed forces and groups, but also an idea of where populations of refugees and internally displaced persons might intersect\/interact with them in some way)?", + "Sentence": "If possible, it should come from field assessments or rapid surveys.6 The following guiding questions should be asked: \n What kinds of population movements are expected during the DDR process (not only movements of people associated with armed forces and groups, but also an idea of where populations of refugees and internally displaced persons might intersect\/interact with them in some way)?", "newParagraph": "ore detailed updated information may available ngo working area health service armed force group possible come field assessment rapid surveys6 following guiding question asked n kind population movement expected ddr process movement people associated armed force group also idea population refugee internally displaced person might intersectinteract way n prevalent health hazard eg endemic disease history epidem ic area origin transit destination n size group woman combatant associate child soldier disabled people etc specific health need n specific health concern relating military personnel opposed civil ian population", "ProcessedSent": "possible come field assessment rapid surveys6 following guiding question asked n kind population movement expected ddr process movement people associated armed force group also idea population refugee internally displaced person might intersectinteract way", "SentID": 10244 }, { "ParagraphID": 2922, - "Paragraph": "ore detailed and updated information may be available from NGOs working in the area or the health services of the armed forces or groups. If possible, it should come from field assessments or rapid surveys.6 The following guiding questions should be asked: \\n What kinds of population movements are expected during the DDR process (not only movements of people associated with armed forces and groups, but also an idea of where populations of refugees and internally displaced persons might intersect\/interact with them in some way)? \\n What are the most prevalent health hazards (e.g., endemic diseases, history of epidem- ics) in the areas of origin, transit and destination? \\n What is the size of groups (women combatants and associates, child soldiers, disabled people, etc.) with specific health needs? \\n Are there specific health concerns relating to military personnel, as opposed to the civil- ian population?", + "Paragraph": "ore detailed and updated information may be available from NGOs working in the area or the health services of the armed forces or groups. If possible, it should come from field assessments or rapid surveys.6 The following guiding questions should be asked: \n What kinds of population movements are expected during the DDR process (not only movements of people associated with armed forces and groups, but also an idea of where populations of refugees and internally displaced persons might intersect\/interact with them in some way)? \n What are the most prevalent health hazards (e.g., endemic diseases, history of epidem- ics) in the areas of origin, transit and destination? \n What is the size of groups (women combatants and associates, child soldiers, disabled people, etc.) with specific health needs? \n Are there specific health concerns relating to military personnel, as opposed to the civil- ian population?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -184422,14 +184422,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1. Assessing epidemiological profiles", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are the most prevalent health hazards (e.g., endemic diseases, history of epidem- ics) in the areas of origin, transit and destination?", + "Sentence": "\n What are the most prevalent health hazards (e.g., endemic diseases, history of epidem- ics) in the areas of origin, transit and destination?", "newParagraph": "ore detailed updated information may available ngo working area health service armed force group possible come field assessment rapid surveys6 following guiding question asked n kind population movement expected ddr process movement people associated armed force group also idea population refugee internally displaced person might intersectinteract way n prevalent health hazard eg endemic disease history epidem ic area origin transit destination n size group woman combatant associate child soldier disabled people etc specific health need n specific health concern relating military personnel opposed civil ian population", "ProcessedSent": "n prevalent health hazard eg endemic disease history epidem ic area origin transit destination", "SentID": 10245 }, { "ParagraphID": 2922, - "Paragraph": "ore detailed and updated information may be available from NGOs working in the area or the health services of the armed forces or groups. If possible, it should come from field assessments or rapid surveys.6 The following guiding questions should be asked: \\n What kinds of population movements are expected during the DDR process (not only movements of people associated with armed forces and groups, but also an idea of where populations of refugees and internally displaced persons might intersect\/interact with them in some way)? \\n What are the most prevalent health hazards (e.g., endemic diseases, history of epidem- ics) in the areas of origin, transit and destination? \\n What is the size of groups (women combatants and associates, child soldiers, disabled people, etc.) with specific health needs? \\n Are there specific health concerns relating to military personnel, as opposed to the civil- ian population?", + "Paragraph": "ore detailed and updated information may be available from NGOs working in the area or the health services of the armed forces or groups. If possible, it should come from field assessments or rapid surveys.6 The following guiding questions should be asked: \n What kinds of population movements are expected during the DDR process (not only movements of people associated with armed forces and groups, but also an idea of where populations of refugees and internally displaced persons might intersect\/interact with them in some way)? \n What are the most prevalent health hazards (e.g., endemic diseases, history of epidem- ics) in the areas of origin, transit and destination? \n What is the size of groups (women combatants and associates, child soldiers, disabled people, etc.) with specific health needs? \n Are there specific health concerns relating to military personnel, as opposed to the civil- ian population?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -184440,14 +184440,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1. Assessing epidemiological profiles", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What is the size of groups (women combatants and associates, child soldiers, disabled people, etc.)", + "Sentence": "\n What is the size of groups (women combatants and associates, child soldiers, disabled people, etc.)", "newParagraph": "ore detailed updated information may available ngo working area health service armed force group possible come field assessment rapid surveys6 following guiding question asked n kind population movement expected ddr process movement people associated armed force group also idea population refugee internally displaced person might intersectinteract way n prevalent health hazard eg endemic disease history epidem ic area origin transit destination n size group woman combatant associate child soldier disabled people etc specific health need n specific health concern relating military personnel opposed civil ian population", "ProcessedSent": "n size group woman combatant associate child soldier disabled people etc", "SentID": 10246 }, { "ParagraphID": 2922, - "Paragraph": "ore detailed and updated information may be available from NGOs working in the area or the health services of the armed forces or groups. If possible, it should come from field assessments or rapid surveys.6 The following guiding questions should be asked: \\n What kinds of population movements are expected during the DDR process (not only movements of people associated with armed forces and groups, but also an idea of where populations of refugees and internally displaced persons might intersect\/interact with them in some way)? \\n What are the most prevalent health hazards (e.g., endemic diseases, history of epidem- ics) in the areas of origin, transit and destination? \\n What is the size of groups (women combatants and associates, child soldiers, disabled people, etc.) with specific health needs? \\n Are there specific health concerns relating to military personnel, as opposed to the civil- ian population?", + "Paragraph": "ore detailed and updated information may be available from NGOs working in the area or the health services of the armed forces or groups. If possible, it should come from field assessments or rapid surveys.6 The following guiding questions should be asked: \n What kinds of population movements are expected during the DDR process (not only movements of people associated with armed forces and groups, but also an idea of where populations of refugees and internally displaced persons might intersect\/interact with them in some way)? \n What are the most prevalent health hazards (e.g., endemic diseases, history of epidem- ics) in the areas of origin, transit and destination? \n What is the size of groups (women combatants and associates, child soldiers, disabled people, etc.) with specific health needs? \n Are there specific health concerns relating to military personnel, as opposed to the civil- ian population?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -184465,7 +184465,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2922, - "Paragraph": "ore detailed and updated information may be available from NGOs working in the area or the health services of the armed forces or groups. If possible, it should come from field assessments or rapid surveys.6 The following guiding questions should be asked: \\n What kinds of population movements are expected during the DDR process (not only movements of people associated with armed forces and groups, but also an idea of where populations of refugees and internally displaced persons might intersect\/interact with them in some way)? \\n What are the most prevalent health hazards (e.g., endemic diseases, history of epidem- ics) in the areas of origin, transit and destination? \\n What is the size of groups (women combatants and associates, child soldiers, disabled people, etc.) with specific health needs? \\n Are there specific health concerns relating to military personnel, as opposed to the civil- ian population?", + "Paragraph": "ore detailed and updated information may be available from NGOs working in the area or the health services of the armed forces or groups. If possible, it should come from field assessments or rapid surveys.6 The following guiding questions should be asked: \n What kinds of population movements are expected during the DDR process (not only movements of people associated with armed forces and groups, but also an idea of where populations of refugees and internally displaced persons might intersect\/interact with them in some way)? \n What are the most prevalent health hazards (e.g., endemic diseases, history of epidem- ics) in the areas of origin, transit and destination? \n What is the size of groups (women combatants and associates, child soldiers, disabled people, etc.) with specific health needs? \n Are there specific health concerns relating to military personnel, as opposed to the civil- ian population?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -184476,7 +184476,7 @@ "Heading2": "7.1. Assessing epidemiological profiles", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Are there specific health concerns relating to military personnel, as opposed to the civil- ian population?", + "Sentence": "\n Are there specific health concerns relating to military personnel, as opposed to the civil- ian population?", "newParagraph": "ore detailed updated information may available ngo working area health service armed force group possible come field assessment rapid surveys6 following guiding question asked n kind population movement expected ddr process movement people associated armed force group also idea population refugee internally displaced person might intersectinteract way n prevalent health hazard eg endemic disease history epidem ic area origin transit destination n size group woman combatant associate child soldier disabled people etc specific health need n specific health concern relating military personnel opposed civil ian population", "ProcessedSent": "n specific health concern relating military personnel opposed civil ian population", "SentID": 10248 @@ -184519,7 +184519,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2924, - "Paragraph": "The following information is needed: \\n What is the location and state of existing health infrastructure? What can be done to upgrade it quickly, if necessary? \\n Do adequate storage facilities for health supplies exist nearby? \\n Is there an adequate communications infrastructure\/system with a good flow of information? \\n What human resources are there (numbers, qualification and experience levels, and geographical distribution)? \\n Where is the closest humanitarian and\/or health organization? Is it ready to participate or offer support? Who will coordinate efforts? \\n What material resources, including supplies, equipment and finances, have been established? \\n What is the state of support systems, including transport, energy, logistics and admin- istration?", + "Paragraph": "The following information is needed: \n What is the location and state of existing health infrastructure? What can be done to upgrade it quickly, if necessary? \n Do adequate storage facilities for health supplies exist nearby? \n Is there an adequate communications infrastructure\/system with a good flow of information? \n What human resources are there (numbers, qualification and experience levels, and geographical distribution)? \n Where is the closest humanitarian and\/or health organization? Is it ready to participate or offer support? Who will coordinate efforts? \n What material resources, including supplies, equipment and finances, have been established? \n What is the state of support systems, including transport, energy, logistics and admin- istration?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -184530,14 +184530,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2. Assessment of health resources", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The following information is needed: \\n What is the location and state of existing health infrastructure?", + "Sentence": "The following information is needed: \n What is the location and state of existing health infrastructure?", "newParagraph": "following information needed n location state existing health infrastructure done upgrade quickly necessary n adequate storage facility health supply exist nearby n adequate communication infrastructuresystem good flow information n human resource number qualification experience level geographical distribution n closest humanitarian andor health organization ready participate offer support coordinate effort n material resource including supply equipment finance established n state support system including transport energy logistics admin istration", "ProcessedSent": "following information needed n location state existing health infrastructure", "SentID": 10251 }, { "ParagraphID": 2924, - "Paragraph": "The following information is needed: \\n What is the location and state of existing health infrastructure? What can be done to upgrade it quickly, if necessary? \\n Do adequate storage facilities for health supplies exist nearby? \\n Is there an adequate communications infrastructure\/system with a good flow of information? \\n What human resources are there (numbers, qualification and experience levels, and geographical distribution)? \\n Where is the closest humanitarian and\/or health organization? Is it ready to participate or offer support? Who will coordinate efforts? \\n What material resources, including supplies, equipment and finances, have been established? \\n What is the state of support systems, including transport, energy, logistics and admin- istration?", + "Paragraph": "The following information is needed: \n What is the location and state of existing health infrastructure? What can be done to upgrade it quickly, if necessary? \n Do adequate storage facilities for health supplies exist nearby? \n Is there an adequate communications infrastructure\/system with a good flow of information? \n What human resources are there (numbers, qualification and experience levels, and geographical distribution)? \n Where is the closest humanitarian and\/or health organization? Is it ready to participate or offer support? Who will coordinate efforts? \n What material resources, including supplies, equipment and finances, have been established? \n What is the state of support systems, including transport, energy, logistics and admin- istration?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -184555,7 +184555,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2924, - "Paragraph": "The following information is needed: \\n What is the location and state of existing health infrastructure? What can be done to upgrade it quickly, if necessary? \\n Do adequate storage facilities for health supplies exist nearby? \\n Is there an adequate communications infrastructure\/system with a good flow of information? \\n What human resources are there (numbers, qualification and experience levels, and geographical distribution)? \\n Where is the closest humanitarian and\/or health organization? Is it ready to participate or offer support? Who will coordinate efforts? \\n What material resources, including supplies, equipment and finances, have been established? \\n What is the state of support systems, including transport, energy, logistics and admin- istration?", + "Paragraph": "The following information is needed: \n What is the location and state of existing health infrastructure? What can be done to upgrade it quickly, if necessary? \n Do adequate storage facilities for health supplies exist nearby? \n Is there an adequate communications infrastructure\/system with a good flow of information? \n What human resources are there (numbers, qualification and experience levels, and geographical distribution)? \n Where is the closest humanitarian and\/or health organization? Is it ready to participate or offer support? Who will coordinate efforts? \n What material resources, including supplies, equipment and finances, have been established? \n What is the state of support systems, including transport, energy, logistics and admin- istration?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -184566,14 +184566,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2. Assessment of health resources", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Do adequate storage facilities for health supplies exist nearby?", + "Sentence": "\n Do adequate storage facilities for health supplies exist nearby?", "newParagraph": "following information needed n location state existing health infrastructure done upgrade quickly necessary n adequate storage facility health supply exist nearby n adequate communication infrastructuresystem good flow information n human resource number qualification experience level geographical distribution n closest humanitarian andor health organization ready participate offer support coordinate effort n material resource including supply equipment finance established n state support system including transport energy logistics admin istration", "ProcessedSent": "n adequate storage facility health supply exist nearby", "SentID": 10253 }, { "ParagraphID": 2924, - "Paragraph": "The following information is needed: \\n What is the location and state of existing health infrastructure? What can be done to upgrade it quickly, if necessary? \\n Do adequate storage facilities for health supplies exist nearby? \\n Is there an adequate communications infrastructure\/system with a good flow of information? \\n What human resources are there (numbers, qualification and experience levels, and geographical distribution)? \\n Where is the closest humanitarian and\/or health organization? Is it ready to participate or offer support? Who will coordinate efforts? \\n What material resources, including supplies, equipment and finances, have been established? \\n What is the state of support systems, including transport, energy, logistics and admin- istration?", + "Paragraph": "The following information is needed: \n What is the location and state of existing health infrastructure? What can be done to upgrade it quickly, if necessary? \n Do adequate storage facilities for health supplies exist nearby? \n Is there an adequate communications infrastructure\/system with a good flow of information? \n What human resources are there (numbers, qualification and experience levels, and geographical distribution)? \n Where is the closest humanitarian and\/or health organization? Is it ready to participate or offer support? Who will coordinate efforts? \n What material resources, including supplies, equipment and finances, have been established? \n What is the state of support systems, including transport, energy, logistics and admin- istration?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -184584,14 +184584,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2. Assessment of health resources", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Is there an adequate communications infrastructure\/system with a good flow of information?", + "Sentence": "\n Is there an adequate communications infrastructure\/system with a good flow of information?", "newParagraph": "following information needed n location state existing health infrastructure done upgrade quickly necessary n adequate storage facility health supply exist nearby n adequate communication infrastructuresystem good flow information n human resource number qualification experience level geographical distribution n closest humanitarian andor health organization ready participate offer support coordinate effort n material resource including supply equipment finance established n state support system including transport energy logistics admin istration", "ProcessedSent": "n adequate communication infrastructuresystem good flow information", "SentID": 10254 }, { "ParagraphID": 2924, - "Paragraph": "The following information is needed: \\n What is the location and state of existing health infrastructure? What can be done to upgrade it quickly, if necessary? \\n Do adequate storage facilities for health supplies exist nearby? \\n Is there an adequate communications infrastructure\/system with a good flow of information? \\n What human resources are there (numbers, qualification and experience levels, and geographical distribution)? \\n Where is the closest humanitarian and\/or health organization? Is it ready to participate or offer support? Who will coordinate efforts? \\n What material resources, including supplies, equipment and finances, have been established? \\n What is the state of support systems, including transport, energy, logistics and admin- istration?", + "Paragraph": "The following information is needed: \n What is the location and state of existing health infrastructure? What can be done to upgrade it quickly, if necessary? \n Do adequate storage facilities for health supplies exist nearby? \n Is there an adequate communications infrastructure\/system with a good flow of information? \n What human resources are there (numbers, qualification and experience levels, and geographical distribution)? \n Where is the closest humanitarian and\/or health organization? Is it ready to participate or offer support? Who will coordinate efforts? \n What material resources, including supplies, equipment and finances, have been established? \n What is the state of support systems, including transport, energy, logistics and admin- istration?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -184602,14 +184602,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2. Assessment of health resources", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What human resources are there (numbers, qualification and experience levels, and geographical distribution)?", + "Sentence": "\n What human resources are there (numbers, qualification and experience levels, and geographical distribution)?", "newParagraph": "following information needed n location state existing health infrastructure done upgrade quickly necessary n adequate storage facility health supply exist nearby n adequate communication infrastructuresystem good flow information n human resource number qualification experience level geographical distribution n closest humanitarian andor health organization ready participate offer support coordinate effort n material resource including supply equipment finance established n state support system including transport energy logistics admin istration", "ProcessedSent": "n human resource number qualification experience level geographical distribution", "SentID": 10255 }, { "ParagraphID": 2924, - "Paragraph": "The following information is needed: \\n What is the location and state of existing health infrastructure? What can be done to upgrade it quickly, if necessary? \\n Do adequate storage facilities for health supplies exist nearby? \\n Is there an adequate communications infrastructure\/system with a good flow of information? \\n What human resources are there (numbers, qualification and experience levels, and geographical distribution)? \\n Where is the closest humanitarian and\/or health organization? Is it ready to participate or offer support? Who will coordinate efforts? \\n What material resources, including supplies, equipment and finances, have been established? \\n What is the state of support systems, including transport, energy, logistics and admin- istration?", + "Paragraph": "The following information is needed: \n What is the location and state of existing health infrastructure? What can be done to upgrade it quickly, if necessary? \n Do adequate storage facilities for health supplies exist nearby? \n Is there an adequate communications infrastructure\/system with a good flow of information? \n What human resources are there (numbers, qualification and experience levels, and geographical distribution)? \n Where is the closest humanitarian and\/or health organization? Is it ready to participate or offer support? Who will coordinate efforts? \n What material resources, including supplies, equipment and finances, have been established? \n What is the state of support systems, including transport, energy, logistics and admin- istration?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -184620,14 +184620,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2. Assessment of health resources", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Where is the closest humanitarian and\/or health organization?", + "Sentence": "\n Where is the closest humanitarian and\/or health organization?", "newParagraph": "following information needed n location state existing health infrastructure done upgrade quickly necessary n adequate storage facility health supply exist nearby n adequate communication infrastructuresystem good flow information n human resource number qualification experience level geographical distribution n closest humanitarian andor health organization ready participate offer support coordinate effort n material resource including supply equipment finance established n state support system including transport energy logistics admin istration", "ProcessedSent": "n closest humanitarian andor health organization", "SentID": 10256 }, { "ParagraphID": 2924, - "Paragraph": "The following information is needed: \\n What is the location and state of existing health infrastructure? What can be done to upgrade it quickly, if necessary? \\n Do adequate storage facilities for health supplies exist nearby? \\n Is there an adequate communications infrastructure\/system with a good flow of information? \\n What human resources are there (numbers, qualification and experience levels, and geographical distribution)? \\n Where is the closest humanitarian and\/or health organization? Is it ready to participate or offer support? Who will coordinate efforts? \\n What material resources, including supplies, equipment and finances, have been established? \\n What is the state of support systems, including transport, energy, logistics and admin- istration?", + "Paragraph": "The following information is needed: \n What is the location and state of existing health infrastructure? What can be done to upgrade it quickly, if necessary? \n Do adequate storage facilities for health supplies exist nearby? \n Is there an adequate communications infrastructure\/system with a good flow of information? \n What human resources are there (numbers, qualification and experience levels, and geographical distribution)? \n Where is the closest humanitarian and\/or health organization? Is it ready to participate or offer support? Who will coordinate efforts? \n What material resources, including supplies, equipment and finances, have been established? \n What is the state of support systems, including transport, energy, logistics and admin- istration?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -184645,7 +184645,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2924, - "Paragraph": "The following information is needed: \\n What is the location and state of existing health infrastructure? What can be done to upgrade it quickly, if necessary? \\n Do adequate storage facilities for health supplies exist nearby? \\n Is there an adequate communications infrastructure\/system with a good flow of information? \\n What human resources are there (numbers, qualification and experience levels, and geographical distribution)? \\n Where is the closest humanitarian and\/or health organization? Is it ready to participate or offer support? Who will coordinate efforts? \\n What material resources, including supplies, equipment and finances, have been established? \\n What is the state of support systems, including transport, energy, logistics and admin- istration?", + "Paragraph": "The following information is needed: \n What is the location and state of existing health infrastructure? What can be done to upgrade it quickly, if necessary? \n Do adequate storage facilities for health supplies exist nearby? \n Is there an adequate communications infrastructure\/system with a good flow of information? \n What human resources are there (numbers, qualification and experience levels, and geographical distribution)? \n Where is the closest humanitarian and\/or health organization? Is it ready to participate or offer support? Who will coordinate efforts? \n What material resources, including supplies, equipment and finances, have been established? \n What is the state of support systems, including transport, energy, logistics and admin- istration?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -184663,7 +184663,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2924, - "Paragraph": "The following information is needed: \\n What is the location and state of existing health infrastructure? What can be done to upgrade it quickly, if necessary? \\n Do adequate storage facilities for health supplies exist nearby? \\n Is there an adequate communications infrastructure\/system with a good flow of information? \\n What human resources are there (numbers, qualification and experience levels, and geographical distribution)? \\n Where is the closest humanitarian and\/or health organization? Is it ready to participate or offer support? Who will coordinate efforts? \\n What material resources, including supplies, equipment and finances, have been established? \\n What is the state of support systems, including transport, energy, logistics and admin- istration?", + "Paragraph": "The following information is needed: \n What is the location and state of existing health infrastructure? What can be done to upgrade it quickly, if necessary? \n Do adequate storage facilities for health supplies exist nearby? \n Is there an adequate communications infrastructure\/system with a good flow of information? \n What human resources are there (numbers, qualification and experience levels, and geographical distribution)? \n Where is the closest humanitarian and\/or health organization? Is it ready to participate or offer support? Who will coordinate efforts? \n What material resources, including supplies, equipment and finances, have been established? \n What is the state of support systems, including transport, energy, logistics and admin- istration?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -184674,14 +184674,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2. Assessment of health resources", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What material resources, including supplies, equipment and finances, have been established?", + "Sentence": "\n What material resources, including supplies, equipment and finances, have been established?", "newParagraph": "following information needed n location state existing health infrastructure done upgrade quickly necessary n adequate storage facility health supply exist nearby n adequate communication infrastructuresystem good flow information n human resource number qualification experience level geographical distribution n closest humanitarian andor health organization ready participate offer support coordinate effort n material resource including supply equipment finance established n state support system including transport energy logistics admin istration", "ProcessedSent": "n material resource including supply equipment finance established", "SentID": 10259 }, { "ParagraphID": 2924, - "Paragraph": "The following information is needed: \\n What is the location and state of existing health infrastructure? What can be done to upgrade it quickly, if necessary? \\n Do adequate storage facilities for health supplies exist nearby? \\n Is there an adequate communications infrastructure\/system with a good flow of information? \\n What human resources are there (numbers, qualification and experience levels, and geographical distribution)? \\n Where is the closest humanitarian and\/or health organization? Is it ready to participate or offer support? Who will coordinate efforts? \\n What material resources, including supplies, equipment and finances, have been established? \\n What is the state of support systems, including transport, energy, logistics and admin- istration?", + "Paragraph": "The following information is needed: \n What is the location and state of existing health infrastructure? What can be done to upgrade it quickly, if necessary? \n Do adequate storage facilities for health supplies exist nearby? \n Is there an adequate communications infrastructure\/system with a good flow of information? \n What human resources are there (numbers, qualification and experience levels, and geographical distribution)? \n Where is the closest humanitarian and\/or health organization? Is it ready to participate or offer support? Who will coordinate efforts? \n What material resources, including supplies, equipment and finances, have been established? \n What is the state of support systems, including transport, energy, logistics and admin- istration?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -184692,7 +184692,7 @@ "Heading2": "7.2. Assessment of health resources", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What is the state of support systems, including transport, energy, logistics and admin- istration?", + "Sentence": "\n What is the state of support systems, including transport, energy, logistics and admin- istration?", "newParagraph": "following information needed n location state existing health infrastructure done upgrade quickly necessary n adequate storage facility health supply exist nearby n adequate communication infrastructuresystem good flow information n human resource number qualification experience level geographical distribution n closest humanitarian andor health organization ready participate offer support coordinate effort n material resource including supply equipment finance established n state support system including transport energy logistics admin istration", "ProcessedSent": "n state support system including transport energy logistics admin istration", "SentID": 10260 @@ -184987,7 +184987,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2932, - "Paragraph": "Health concerns will vary greatly according to the geographical area where the demobili- zation occurs. Depending on location, health activities will normally include some or all of the following: \\n providing medical screening and counselling for combatants and dependants; \\n establishing basic preventive and curative health services. \\n Priority should go to acute and infectious conditions (typically malaria); however, as soon as possible, measures should also be set in place for chronic and non-infectious cases (e.g., tuberculosis and diabetes, or epilepsy) and for voluntary testing and counselling services for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV\/AIDS; \\n establishing a referral system that can cover medical, surgical and obstetric emergencies, as well as laboratory confirmation at least for diseases that could cause epidemics; \\n adopting and adapting national standard protocols for the treatment of the most common diseases;9 \\n establishing systems to monitor potential epidemiological\/nutritional problems within assembly areas, barracks, camps for dependants, etc. with the capacity for early warning and outbreak response; \\n providing drugs and equipment including a system for water quality control and bio- logical sample management; \\n organizing public health information campaigns on STIs (including HIV\/AIDS), water- borne disease, sanitation issues such as excreta disposal, food conservation and basic hygiene (especially for longer-term cantonment); \\n establishing systems for coordination, communication and logistics in support of the delivery of preventive and curative health care; \\n establishing systems for coordination with other sectors, to ensure that all vital needs and support systems are in place and functioning.", + "Paragraph": "Health concerns will vary greatly according to the geographical area where the demobili- zation occurs. Depending on location, health activities will normally include some or all of the following: \n providing medical screening and counselling for combatants and dependants; \n establishing basic preventive and curative health services. \n Priority should go to acute and infectious conditions (typically malaria); however, as soon as possible, measures should also be set in place for chronic and non-infectious cases (e.g., tuberculosis and diabetes, or epilepsy) and for voluntary testing and counselling services for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV\/AIDS; \n establishing a referral system that can cover medical, surgical and obstetric emergencies, as well as laboratory confirmation at least for diseases that could cause epidemics; \n adopting and adapting national standard protocols for the treatment of the most common diseases;9 \n establishing systems to monitor potential epidemiological\/nutritional problems within assembly areas, barracks, camps for dependants, etc. with the capacity for early warning and outbreak response; \n providing drugs and equipment including a system for water quality control and bio- logical sample management; \n organizing public health information campaigns on STIs (including HIV\/AIDS), water- borne disease, sanitation issues such as excreta disposal, food conservation and basic hygiene (especially for longer-term cantonment); \n establishing systems for coordination, communication and logistics in support of the delivery of preventive and curative health care; \n establishing systems for coordination with other sectors, to ensure that all vital needs and support systems are in place and functioning.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -185005,7 +185005,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2932, - "Paragraph": "Health concerns will vary greatly according to the geographical area where the demobili- zation occurs. Depending on location, health activities will normally include some or all of the following: \\n providing medical screening and counselling for combatants and dependants; \\n establishing basic preventive and curative health services. \\n Priority should go to acute and infectious conditions (typically malaria); however, as soon as possible, measures should also be set in place for chronic and non-infectious cases (e.g., tuberculosis and diabetes, or epilepsy) and for voluntary testing and counselling services for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV\/AIDS; \\n establishing a referral system that can cover medical, surgical and obstetric emergencies, as well as laboratory confirmation at least for diseases that could cause epidemics; \\n adopting and adapting national standard protocols for the treatment of the most common diseases;9 \\n establishing systems to monitor potential epidemiological\/nutritional problems within assembly areas, barracks, camps for dependants, etc. with the capacity for early warning and outbreak response; \\n providing drugs and equipment including a system for water quality control and bio- logical sample management; \\n organizing public health information campaigns on STIs (including HIV\/AIDS), water- borne disease, sanitation issues such as excreta disposal, food conservation and basic hygiene (especially for longer-term cantonment); \\n establishing systems for coordination, communication and logistics in support of the delivery of preventive and curative health care; \\n establishing systems for coordination with other sectors, to ensure that all vital needs and support systems are in place and functioning.", + "Paragraph": "Health concerns will vary greatly according to the geographical area where the demobili- zation occurs. Depending on location, health activities will normally include some or all of the following: \n providing medical screening and counselling for combatants and dependants; \n establishing basic preventive and curative health services. \n Priority should go to acute and infectious conditions (typically malaria); however, as soon as possible, measures should also be set in place for chronic and non-infectious cases (e.g., tuberculosis and diabetes, or epilepsy) and for voluntary testing and counselling services for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV\/AIDS; \n establishing a referral system that can cover medical, surgical and obstetric emergencies, as well as laboratory confirmation at least for diseases that could cause epidemics; \n adopting and adapting national standard protocols for the treatment of the most common diseases;9 \n establishing systems to monitor potential epidemiological\/nutritional problems within assembly areas, barracks, camps for dependants, etc. with the capacity for early warning and outbreak response; \n providing drugs and equipment including a system for water quality control and bio- logical sample management; \n organizing public health information campaigns on STIs (including HIV\/AIDS), water- borne disease, sanitation issues such as excreta disposal, food conservation and basic hygiene (especially for longer-term cantonment); \n establishing systems for coordination, communication and logistics in support of the delivery of preventive and curative health care; \n establishing systems for coordination with other sectors, to ensure that all vital needs and support systems are in place and functioning.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -185016,14 +185016,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.1. Dealing with key health concerns during demobilization", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Depending on location, health activities will normally include some or all of the following: \\n providing medical screening and counselling for combatants and dependants; \\n establishing basic preventive and curative health services.", + "Sentence": "Depending on location, health activities will normally include some or all of the following: \n providing medical screening and counselling for combatants and dependants; \n establishing basic preventive and curative health services.", "newParagraph": "health concern vary greatly according geographical area demobili zation occurs depending location health activity normally include following n providing medical screening counselling combatant dependant n establishing basic preventive curative health service n priority go acute infectious condition typically malaria however soon possible measure also set place chronic noninfectious case eg tuberculosis diabetes epilepsy voluntary testing counselling service sexually transmitted infection stis including hivaids n establishing referral system cover medical surgical obstetric emergency well laboratory confirmation least disease could cause epidemic n adopting adapting national standard protocol treatment common diseases9 n establishing system monitor potential epidemiologicalnutritional problem within assembly area barrack camp dependant etc capacity early warning outbreak response n providing drug equipment including system water quality control bio logical sample management n organizing public health information campaign stis including hivaids water borne disease sanitation issue excreta disposal food conservation basic hygiene especially longerterm cantonment n establishing system coordination communication logistics support delivery preventive curative health care n establishing system coordination sector ensure vital need support system place functioning", "ProcessedSent": "depending location health activity normally include following n providing medical screening counselling combatant dependant n establishing basic preventive curative health service", "SentID": 10278 }, { "ParagraphID": 2932, - "Paragraph": "Health concerns will vary greatly according to the geographical area where the demobili- zation occurs. Depending on location, health activities will normally include some or all of the following: \\n providing medical screening and counselling for combatants and dependants; \\n establishing basic preventive and curative health services. \\n Priority should go to acute and infectious conditions (typically malaria); however, as soon as possible, measures should also be set in place for chronic and non-infectious cases (e.g., tuberculosis and diabetes, or epilepsy) and for voluntary testing and counselling services for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV\/AIDS; \\n establishing a referral system that can cover medical, surgical and obstetric emergencies, as well as laboratory confirmation at least for diseases that could cause epidemics; \\n adopting and adapting national standard protocols for the treatment of the most common diseases;9 \\n establishing systems to monitor potential epidemiological\/nutritional problems within assembly areas, barracks, camps for dependants, etc. with the capacity for early warning and outbreak response; \\n providing drugs and equipment including a system for water quality control and bio- logical sample management; \\n organizing public health information campaigns on STIs (including HIV\/AIDS), water- borne disease, sanitation issues such as excreta disposal, food conservation and basic hygiene (especially for longer-term cantonment); \\n establishing systems for coordination, communication and logistics in support of the delivery of preventive and curative health care; \\n establishing systems for coordination with other sectors, to ensure that all vital needs and support systems are in place and functioning.", + "Paragraph": "Health concerns will vary greatly according to the geographical area where the demobili- zation occurs. Depending on location, health activities will normally include some or all of the following: \n providing medical screening and counselling for combatants and dependants; \n establishing basic preventive and curative health services. \n Priority should go to acute and infectious conditions (typically malaria); however, as soon as possible, measures should also be set in place for chronic and non-infectious cases (e.g., tuberculosis and diabetes, or epilepsy) and for voluntary testing and counselling services for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV\/AIDS; \n establishing a referral system that can cover medical, surgical and obstetric emergencies, as well as laboratory confirmation at least for diseases that could cause epidemics; \n adopting and adapting national standard protocols for the treatment of the most common diseases;9 \n establishing systems to monitor potential epidemiological\/nutritional problems within assembly areas, barracks, camps for dependants, etc. with the capacity for early warning and outbreak response; \n providing drugs and equipment including a system for water quality control and bio- logical sample management; \n organizing public health information campaigns on STIs (including HIV\/AIDS), water- borne disease, sanitation issues such as excreta disposal, food conservation and basic hygiene (especially for longer-term cantonment); \n establishing systems for coordination, communication and logistics in support of the delivery of preventive and curative health care; \n establishing systems for coordination with other sectors, to ensure that all vital needs and support systems are in place and functioning.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -185034,14 +185034,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.1. Dealing with key health concerns during demobilization", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Priority should go to acute and infectious conditions (typically malaria); however, as soon as possible, measures should also be set in place for chronic and non-infectious cases (e.g., tuberculosis and diabetes, or epilepsy) and for voluntary testing and counselling services for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV\/AIDS; \\n establishing a referral system that can cover medical, surgical and obstetric emergencies, as well as laboratory confirmation at least for diseases that could cause epidemics; \\n adopting and adapting national standard protocols for the treatment of the most common diseases;9 \\n establishing systems to monitor potential epidemiological\/nutritional problems within assembly areas, barracks, camps for dependants, etc.", + "Sentence": "\n Priority should go to acute and infectious conditions (typically malaria); however, as soon as possible, measures should also be set in place for chronic and non-infectious cases (e.g., tuberculosis and diabetes, or epilepsy) and for voluntary testing and counselling services for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV\/AIDS; \n establishing a referral system that can cover medical, surgical and obstetric emergencies, as well as laboratory confirmation at least for diseases that could cause epidemics; \n adopting and adapting national standard protocols for the treatment of the most common diseases;9 \n establishing systems to monitor potential epidemiological\/nutritional problems within assembly areas, barracks, camps for dependants, etc.", "newParagraph": "health concern vary greatly according geographical area demobili zation occurs depending location health activity normally include following n providing medical screening counselling combatant dependant n establishing basic preventive curative health service n priority go acute infectious condition typically malaria however soon possible measure also set place chronic noninfectious case eg tuberculosis diabetes epilepsy voluntary testing counselling service sexually transmitted infection stis including hivaids n establishing referral system cover medical surgical obstetric emergency well laboratory confirmation least disease could cause epidemic n adopting adapting national standard protocol treatment common diseases9 n establishing system monitor potential epidemiologicalnutritional problem within assembly area barrack camp dependant etc capacity early warning outbreak response n providing drug equipment including system water quality control bio logical sample management n organizing public health information campaign stis including hivaids water borne disease sanitation issue excreta disposal food conservation basic hygiene especially longerterm cantonment n establishing system coordination communication logistics support delivery preventive curative health care n establishing system coordination sector ensure vital need support system place functioning", "ProcessedSent": "n priority go acute infectious condition typically malaria however soon possible measure also set place chronic noninfectious case eg tuberculosis diabetes epilepsy voluntary testing counselling service sexually transmitted infection stis including hivaids n establishing referral system cover medical surgical obstetric emergency well laboratory confirmation least disease could cause epidemic n adopting adapting national standard protocol treatment common diseases9 n establishing system monitor potential epidemiologicalnutritional problem within assembly area barrack camp dependant etc", "SentID": 10279 }, { "ParagraphID": 2932, - "Paragraph": "Health concerns will vary greatly according to the geographical area where the demobili- zation occurs. Depending on location, health activities will normally include some or all of the following: \\n providing medical screening and counselling for combatants and dependants; \\n establishing basic preventive and curative health services. \\n Priority should go to acute and infectious conditions (typically malaria); however, as soon as possible, measures should also be set in place for chronic and non-infectious cases (e.g., tuberculosis and diabetes, or epilepsy) and for voluntary testing and counselling services for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV\/AIDS; \\n establishing a referral system that can cover medical, surgical and obstetric emergencies, as well as laboratory confirmation at least for diseases that could cause epidemics; \\n adopting and adapting national standard protocols for the treatment of the most common diseases;9 \\n establishing systems to monitor potential epidemiological\/nutritional problems within assembly areas, barracks, camps for dependants, etc. with the capacity for early warning and outbreak response; \\n providing drugs and equipment including a system for water quality control and bio- logical sample management; \\n organizing public health information campaigns on STIs (including HIV\/AIDS), water- borne disease, sanitation issues such as excreta disposal, food conservation and basic hygiene (especially for longer-term cantonment); \\n establishing systems for coordination, communication and logistics in support of the delivery of preventive and curative health care; \\n establishing systems for coordination with other sectors, to ensure that all vital needs and support systems are in place and functioning.", + "Paragraph": "Health concerns will vary greatly according to the geographical area where the demobili- zation occurs. Depending on location, health activities will normally include some or all of the following: \n providing medical screening and counselling for combatants and dependants; \n establishing basic preventive and curative health services. \n Priority should go to acute and infectious conditions (typically malaria); however, as soon as possible, measures should also be set in place for chronic and non-infectious cases (e.g., tuberculosis and diabetes, or epilepsy) and for voluntary testing and counselling services for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV\/AIDS; \n establishing a referral system that can cover medical, surgical and obstetric emergencies, as well as laboratory confirmation at least for diseases that could cause epidemics; \n adopting and adapting national standard protocols for the treatment of the most common diseases;9 \n establishing systems to monitor potential epidemiological\/nutritional problems within assembly areas, barracks, camps for dependants, etc. with the capacity for early warning and outbreak response; \n providing drugs and equipment including a system for water quality control and bio- logical sample management; \n organizing public health information campaigns on STIs (including HIV\/AIDS), water- borne disease, sanitation issues such as excreta disposal, food conservation and basic hygiene (especially for longer-term cantonment); \n establishing systems for coordination, communication and logistics in support of the delivery of preventive and curative health care; \n establishing systems for coordination with other sectors, to ensure that all vital needs and support systems are in place and functioning.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -185052,14 +185052,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.1. Dealing with key health concerns during demobilization", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "with the capacity for early warning and outbreak response; \\n providing drugs and equipment including a system for water quality control and bio- logical sample management; \\n organizing public health information campaigns on STIs (including HIV\/AIDS), water- borne disease, sanitation issues such as excreta disposal, food conservation and basic hygiene (especially for longer-term cantonment); \\n establishing systems for coordination, communication and logistics in support of the delivery of preventive and curative health care; \\n establishing systems for coordination with other sectors, to ensure that all vital needs and support systems are in place and functioning.", + "Sentence": "with the capacity for early warning and outbreak response; \n providing drugs and equipment including a system for water quality control and bio- logical sample management; \n organizing public health information campaigns on STIs (including HIV\/AIDS), water- borne disease, sanitation issues such as excreta disposal, food conservation and basic hygiene (especially for longer-term cantonment); \n establishing systems for coordination, communication and logistics in support of the delivery of preventive and curative health care; \n establishing systems for coordination with other sectors, to ensure that all vital needs and support systems are in place and functioning.", "newParagraph": "health concern vary greatly according geographical area demobili zation occurs depending location health activity normally include following n providing medical screening counselling combatant dependant n establishing basic preventive curative health service n priority go acute infectious condition typically malaria however soon possible measure also set place chronic noninfectious case eg tuberculosis diabetes epilepsy voluntary testing counselling service sexually transmitted infection stis including hivaids n establishing referral system cover medical surgical obstetric emergency well laboratory confirmation least disease could cause epidemic n adopting adapting national standard protocol treatment common diseases9 n establishing system monitor potential epidemiologicalnutritional problem within assembly area barrack camp dependant etc capacity early warning outbreak response n providing drug equipment including system water quality control bio logical sample management n organizing public health information campaign stis including hivaids water borne disease sanitation issue excreta disposal food conservation basic hygiene especially longerterm cantonment n establishing system coordination communication logistics support delivery preventive curative health care n establishing system coordination sector ensure vital need support system place functioning", "ProcessedSent": "capacity early warning outbreak response n providing drug equipment including system water quality control bio logical sample management n organizing public health information campaign stis including hivaids water borne disease sanitation issue excreta disposal food conservation basic hygiene especially longerterm cantonment n establishing system coordination communication logistics support delivery preventive curative health care n establishing system coordination sector ensure vital need support system place functioning", "SentID": 10280 }, { "ParagraphID": 2933, - "Paragraph": "Whenever people are grouped together in a temporary facility such as a cantonment site, there will be matters of specific concern to health practitioners. Issues to be aware of include: \\n Chronic communicable diseases: Proper compliance with anti-TB treatment can be difficult to organize and sustain, but it should be considered a priority; \\n HIV\/AIDS: Screening of soldiers should be voluntary and carried out after combatants are given enough information about the screening process. The usefulness of screening when the system is not able to respond adequately (by providing anti-retroviral therapy and proper follow-up) should be carefully thought out. Combatants have the right to the confidentiality of the information collected;10 \\n Violence\/injury prevention: Cantonment is a strategy for reducing violence, because it aims to contain armed combatants until their weapons can be safely removed. However, there is a strong likelihood of violence within cantonment sites, especially when abducted women or girls are separated from men. Specific care should be taken to avoid all pos- sible situations that might lead to sexual violence; \\n Mental health, psychosocial support and substance abuse:11 While cantonment provides an opportunity to check for the presence of self-directed violence such as drug and alcohol abuse, a key principle is that the best way of improving the mental well-being of ex- combatants and their associates is through economic and social reintegration, with com- munities having the central role in developing and implementing the social support systems needed to achieve this. In the demobilization stage of DDR, the health services must have the capacity to detect and treat severe, acute and chronic mental disorders. An evidence-based approach to substance abuse in DDR processes has still to be developed.", + "Paragraph": "Whenever people are grouped together in a temporary facility such as a cantonment site, there will be matters of specific concern to health practitioners. Issues to be aware of include: \n Chronic communicable diseases: Proper compliance with anti-TB treatment can be difficult to organize and sustain, but it should be considered a priority; \n HIV\/AIDS: Screening of soldiers should be voluntary and carried out after combatants are given enough information about the screening process. The usefulness of screening when the system is not able to respond adequately (by providing anti-retroviral therapy and proper follow-up) should be carefully thought out. Combatants have the right to the confidentiality of the information collected;10 \n Violence\/injury prevention: Cantonment is a strategy for reducing violence, because it aims to contain armed combatants until their weapons can be safely removed. However, there is a strong likelihood of violence within cantonment sites, especially when abducted women or girls are separated from men. Specific care should be taken to avoid all pos- sible situations that might lead to sexual violence; \n Mental health, psychosocial support and substance abuse:11 While cantonment provides an opportunity to check for the presence of self-directed violence such as drug and alcohol abuse, a key principle is that the best way of improving the mental well-being of ex- combatants and their associates is through economic and social reintegration, with com- munities having the central role in developing and implementing the social support systems needed to achieve this. In the demobilization stage of DDR, the health services must have the capacity to detect and treat severe, acute and chronic mental disorders. An evidence-based approach to substance abuse in DDR processes has still to be developed.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -185077,7 +185077,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2933, - "Paragraph": "Whenever people are grouped together in a temporary facility such as a cantonment site, there will be matters of specific concern to health practitioners. Issues to be aware of include: \\n Chronic communicable diseases: Proper compliance with anti-TB treatment can be difficult to organize and sustain, but it should be considered a priority; \\n HIV\/AIDS: Screening of soldiers should be voluntary and carried out after combatants are given enough information about the screening process. The usefulness of screening when the system is not able to respond adequately (by providing anti-retroviral therapy and proper follow-up) should be carefully thought out. Combatants have the right to the confidentiality of the information collected;10 \\n Violence\/injury prevention: Cantonment is a strategy for reducing violence, because it aims to contain armed combatants until their weapons can be safely removed. However, there is a strong likelihood of violence within cantonment sites, especially when abducted women or girls are separated from men. Specific care should be taken to avoid all pos- sible situations that might lead to sexual violence; \\n Mental health, psychosocial support and substance abuse:11 While cantonment provides an opportunity to check for the presence of self-directed violence such as drug and alcohol abuse, a key principle is that the best way of improving the mental well-being of ex- combatants and their associates is through economic and social reintegration, with com- munities having the central role in developing and implementing the social support systems needed to achieve this. In the demobilization stage of DDR, the health services must have the capacity to detect and treat severe, acute and chronic mental disorders. An evidence-based approach to substance abuse in DDR processes has still to be developed.", + "Paragraph": "Whenever people are grouped together in a temporary facility such as a cantonment site, there will be matters of specific concern to health practitioners. Issues to be aware of include: \n Chronic communicable diseases: Proper compliance with anti-TB treatment can be difficult to organize and sustain, but it should be considered a priority; \n HIV\/AIDS: Screening of soldiers should be voluntary and carried out after combatants are given enough information about the screening process. The usefulness of screening when the system is not able to respond adequately (by providing anti-retroviral therapy and proper follow-up) should be carefully thought out. Combatants have the right to the confidentiality of the information collected;10 \n Violence\/injury prevention: Cantonment is a strategy for reducing violence, because it aims to contain armed combatants until their weapons can be safely removed. However, there is a strong likelihood of violence within cantonment sites, especially when abducted women or girls are separated from men. Specific care should be taken to avoid all pos- sible situations that might lead to sexual violence; \n Mental health, psychosocial support and substance abuse:11 While cantonment provides an opportunity to check for the presence of self-directed violence such as drug and alcohol abuse, a key principle is that the best way of improving the mental well-being of ex- combatants and their associates is through economic and social reintegration, with com- munities having the central role in developing and implementing the social support systems needed to achieve this. In the demobilization stage of DDR, the health services must have the capacity to detect and treat severe, acute and chronic mental disorders. An evidence-based approach to substance abuse in DDR processes has still to be developed.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -185088,14 +185088,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.1. Dealing with key health concerns during demobilization", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Issues to be aware of include: \\n Chronic communicable diseases: Proper compliance with anti-TB treatment can be difficult to organize and sustain, but it should be considered a priority; \\n HIV\/AIDS: Screening of soldiers should be voluntary and carried out after combatants are given enough information about the screening process.", + "Sentence": "Issues to be aware of include: \n Chronic communicable diseases: Proper compliance with anti-TB treatment can be difficult to organize and sustain, but it should be considered a priority; \n HIV\/AIDS: Screening of soldiers should be voluntary and carried out after combatants are given enough information about the screening process.", "newParagraph": "whenever people grouped together temporary facility cantonment site matter specific concern health practitioner issue aware include n chronic communicable disease proper compliance antitb treatment difficult organize sustain considered priority n hivaids screening soldier voluntary carried combatant given enough information screening process usefulness screening system able respond adequately providing antiretroviral therapy proper followup carefully thought combatant right confidentiality information collected10 n violenceinjury prevention cantonment strategy reducing violence aim contain armed combatant weapon safely removed however strong likelihood violence within cantonment site especially abducted woman girl separated men specific care taken avoid po sible situation might lead sexual violence n mental health psychosocial support substance abuse11 cantonment provides opportunity check presence selfdirected violence drug alcohol abuse key principle best way improving mental wellbeing ex combatant associate economic social reintegration com munities central role developing implementing social support system needed achieve demobilization stage ddr health service must capacity detect treat severe acute chronic mental disorder evidencebased approach substance abuse ddr process still developed", "ProcessedSent": "issue aware include n chronic communicable disease proper compliance antitb treatment difficult organize sustain considered priority n hivaids screening soldier voluntary carried combatant given enough information screening process", "SentID": 10282 }, { "ParagraphID": 2933, - "Paragraph": "Whenever people are grouped together in a temporary facility such as a cantonment site, there will be matters of specific concern to health practitioners. Issues to be aware of include: \\n Chronic communicable diseases: Proper compliance with anti-TB treatment can be difficult to organize and sustain, but it should be considered a priority; \\n HIV\/AIDS: Screening of soldiers should be voluntary and carried out after combatants are given enough information about the screening process. The usefulness of screening when the system is not able to respond adequately (by providing anti-retroviral therapy and proper follow-up) should be carefully thought out. Combatants have the right to the confidentiality of the information collected;10 \\n Violence\/injury prevention: Cantonment is a strategy for reducing violence, because it aims to contain armed combatants until their weapons can be safely removed. However, there is a strong likelihood of violence within cantonment sites, especially when abducted women or girls are separated from men. Specific care should be taken to avoid all pos- sible situations that might lead to sexual violence; \\n Mental health, psychosocial support and substance abuse:11 While cantonment provides an opportunity to check for the presence of self-directed violence such as drug and alcohol abuse, a key principle is that the best way of improving the mental well-being of ex- combatants and their associates is through economic and social reintegration, with com- munities having the central role in developing and implementing the social support systems needed to achieve this. In the demobilization stage of DDR, the health services must have the capacity to detect and treat severe, acute and chronic mental disorders. An evidence-based approach to substance abuse in DDR processes has still to be developed.", + "Paragraph": "Whenever people are grouped together in a temporary facility such as a cantonment site, there will be matters of specific concern to health practitioners. Issues to be aware of include: \n Chronic communicable diseases: Proper compliance with anti-TB treatment can be difficult to organize and sustain, but it should be considered a priority; \n HIV\/AIDS: Screening of soldiers should be voluntary and carried out after combatants are given enough information about the screening process. The usefulness of screening when the system is not able to respond adequately (by providing anti-retroviral therapy and proper follow-up) should be carefully thought out. Combatants have the right to the confidentiality of the information collected;10 \n Violence\/injury prevention: Cantonment is a strategy for reducing violence, because it aims to contain armed combatants until their weapons can be safely removed. However, there is a strong likelihood of violence within cantonment sites, especially when abducted women or girls are separated from men. Specific care should be taken to avoid all pos- sible situations that might lead to sexual violence; \n Mental health, psychosocial support and substance abuse:11 While cantonment provides an opportunity to check for the presence of self-directed violence such as drug and alcohol abuse, a key principle is that the best way of improving the mental well-being of ex- combatants and their associates is through economic and social reintegration, with com- munities having the central role in developing and implementing the social support systems needed to achieve this. In the demobilization stage of DDR, the health services must have the capacity to detect and treat severe, acute and chronic mental disorders. An evidence-based approach to substance abuse in DDR processes has still to be developed.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -185113,7 +185113,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2933, - "Paragraph": "Whenever people are grouped together in a temporary facility such as a cantonment site, there will be matters of specific concern to health practitioners. Issues to be aware of include: \\n Chronic communicable diseases: Proper compliance with anti-TB treatment can be difficult to organize and sustain, but it should be considered a priority; \\n HIV\/AIDS: Screening of soldiers should be voluntary and carried out after combatants are given enough information about the screening process. The usefulness of screening when the system is not able to respond adequately (by providing anti-retroviral therapy and proper follow-up) should be carefully thought out. Combatants have the right to the confidentiality of the information collected;10 \\n Violence\/injury prevention: Cantonment is a strategy for reducing violence, because it aims to contain armed combatants until their weapons can be safely removed. However, there is a strong likelihood of violence within cantonment sites, especially when abducted women or girls are separated from men. Specific care should be taken to avoid all pos- sible situations that might lead to sexual violence; \\n Mental health, psychosocial support and substance abuse:11 While cantonment provides an opportunity to check for the presence of self-directed violence such as drug and alcohol abuse, a key principle is that the best way of improving the mental well-being of ex- combatants and their associates is through economic and social reintegration, with com- munities having the central role in developing and implementing the social support systems needed to achieve this. In the demobilization stage of DDR, the health services must have the capacity to detect and treat severe, acute and chronic mental disorders. An evidence-based approach to substance abuse in DDR processes has still to be developed.", + "Paragraph": "Whenever people are grouped together in a temporary facility such as a cantonment site, there will be matters of specific concern to health practitioners. Issues to be aware of include: \n Chronic communicable diseases: Proper compliance with anti-TB treatment can be difficult to organize and sustain, but it should be considered a priority; \n HIV\/AIDS: Screening of soldiers should be voluntary and carried out after combatants are given enough information about the screening process. The usefulness of screening when the system is not able to respond adequately (by providing anti-retroviral therapy and proper follow-up) should be carefully thought out. Combatants have the right to the confidentiality of the information collected;10 \n Violence\/injury prevention: Cantonment is a strategy for reducing violence, because it aims to contain armed combatants until their weapons can be safely removed. However, there is a strong likelihood of violence within cantonment sites, especially when abducted women or girls are separated from men. Specific care should be taken to avoid all pos- sible situations that might lead to sexual violence; \n Mental health, psychosocial support and substance abuse:11 While cantonment provides an opportunity to check for the presence of self-directed violence such as drug and alcohol abuse, a key principle is that the best way of improving the mental well-being of ex- combatants and their associates is through economic and social reintegration, with com- munities having the central role in developing and implementing the social support systems needed to achieve this. In the demobilization stage of DDR, the health services must have the capacity to detect and treat severe, acute and chronic mental disorders. An evidence-based approach to substance abuse in DDR processes has still to be developed.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -185124,14 +185124,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.1. Dealing with key health concerns during demobilization", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Combatants have the right to the confidentiality of the information collected;10 \\n Violence\/injury prevention: Cantonment is a strategy for reducing violence, because it aims to contain armed combatants until their weapons can be safely removed.", + "Sentence": "Combatants have the right to the confidentiality of the information collected;10 \n Violence\/injury prevention: Cantonment is a strategy for reducing violence, because it aims to contain armed combatants until their weapons can be safely removed.", "newParagraph": "whenever people grouped together temporary facility cantonment site matter specific concern health practitioner issue aware include n chronic communicable disease proper compliance antitb treatment difficult organize sustain considered priority n hivaids screening soldier voluntary carried combatant given enough information screening process usefulness screening system able respond adequately providing antiretroviral therapy proper followup carefully thought combatant right confidentiality information collected10 n violenceinjury prevention cantonment strategy reducing violence aim contain armed combatant weapon safely removed however strong likelihood violence within cantonment site especially abducted woman girl separated men specific care taken avoid po sible situation might lead sexual violence n mental health psychosocial support substance abuse11 cantonment provides opportunity check presence selfdirected violence drug alcohol abuse key principle best way improving mental wellbeing ex combatant associate economic social reintegration com munities central role developing implementing social support system needed achieve demobilization stage ddr health service must capacity detect treat severe acute chronic mental disorder evidencebased approach substance abuse ddr process still developed", "ProcessedSent": "combatant right confidentiality information collected10 n violenceinjury prevention cantonment strategy reducing violence aim contain armed combatant weapon safely removed", "SentID": 10284 }, { "ParagraphID": 2933, - "Paragraph": "Whenever people are grouped together in a temporary facility such as a cantonment site, there will be matters of specific concern to health practitioners. Issues to be aware of include: \\n Chronic communicable diseases: Proper compliance with anti-TB treatment can be difficult to organize and sustain, but it should be considered a priority; \\n HIV\/AIDS: Screening of soldiers should be voluntary and carried out after combatants are given enough information about the screening process. The usefulness of screening when the system is not able to respond adequately (by providing anti-retroviral therapy and proper follow-up) should be carefully thought out. Combatants have the right to the confidentiality of the information collected;10 \\n Violence\/injury prevention: Cantonment is a strategy for reducing violence, because it aims to contain armed combatants until their weapons can be safely removed. However, there is a strong likelihood of violence within cantonment sites, especially when abducted women or girls are separated from men. Specific care should be taken to avoid all pos- sible situations that might lead to sexual violence; \\n Mental health, psychosocial support and substance abuse:11 While cantonment provides an opportunity to check for the presence of self-directed violence such as drug and alcohol abuse, a key principle is that the best way of improving the mental well-being of ex- combatants and their associates is through economic and social reintegration, with com- munities having the central role in developing and implementing the social support systems needed to achieve this. In the demobilization stage of DDR, the health services must have the capacity to detect and treat severe, acute and chronic mental disorders. An evidence-based approach to substance abuse in DDR processes has still to be developed.", + "Paragraph": "Whenever people are grouped together in a temporary facility such as a cantonment site, there will be matters of specific concern to health practitioners. Issues to be aware of include: \n Chronic communicable diseases: Proper compliance with anti-TB treatment can be difficult to organize and sustain, but it should be considered a priority; \n HIV\/AIDS: Screening of soldiers should be voluntary and carried out after combatants are given enough information about the screening process. The usefulness of screening when the system is not able to respond adequately (by providing anti-retroviral therapy and proper follow-up) should be carefully thought out. Combatants have the right to the confidentiality of the information collected;10 \n Violence\/injury prevention: Cantonment is a strategy for reducing violence, because it aims to contain armed combatants until their weapons can be safely removed. However, there is a strong likelihood of violence within cantonment sites, especially when abducted women or girls are separated from men. Specific care should be taken to avoid all pos- sible situations that might lead to sexual violence; \n Mental health, psychosocial support and substance abuse:11 While cantonment provides an opportunity to check for the presence of self-directed violence such as drug and alcohol abuse, a key principle is that the best way of improving the mental well-being of ex- combatants and their associates is through economic and social reintegration, with com- munities having the central role in developing and implementing the social support systems needed to achieve this. In the demobilization stage of DDR, the health services must have the capacity to detect and treat severe, acute and chronic mental disorders. An evidence-based approach to substance abuse in DDR processes has still to be developed.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -185149,7 +185149,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2933, - "Paragraph": "Whenever people are grouped together in a temporary facility such as a cantonment site, there will be matters of specific concern to health practitioners. Issues to be aware of include: \\n Chronic communicable diseases: Proper compliance with anti-TB treatment can be difficult to organize and sustain, but it should be considered a priority; \\n HIV\/AIDS: Screening of soldiers should be voluntary and carried out after combatants are given enough information about the screening process. The usefulness of screening when the system is not able to respond adequately (by providing anti-retroviral therapy and proper follow-up) should be carefully thought out. Combatants have the right to the confidentiality of the information collected;10 \\n Violence\/injury prevention: Cantonment is a strategy for reducing violence, because it aims to contain armed combatants until their weapons can be safely removed. However, there is a strong likelihood of violence within cantonment sites, especially when abducted women or girls are separated from men. Specific care should be taken to avoid all pos- sible situations that might lead to sexual violence; \\n Mental health, psychosocial support and substance abuse:11 While cantonment provides an opportunity to check for the presence of self-directed violence such as drug and alcohol abuse, a key principle is that the best way of improving the mental well-being of ex- combatants and their associates is through economic and social reintegration, with com- munities having the central role in developing and implementing the social support systems needed to achieve this. In the demobilization stage of DDR, the health services must have the capacity to detect and treat severe, acute and chronic mental disorders. An evidence-based approach to substance abuse in DDR processes has still to be developed.", + "Paragraph": "Whenever people are grouped together in a temporary facility such as a cantonment site, there will be matters of specific concern to health practitioners. Issues to be aware of include: \n Chronic communicable diseases: Proper compliance with anti-TB treatment can be difficult to organize and sustain, but it should be considered a priority; \n HIV\/AIDS: Screening of soldiers should be voluntary and carried out after combatants are given enough information about the screening process. The usefulness of screening when the system is not able to respond adequately (by providing anti-retroviral therapy and proper follow-up) should be carefully thought out. Combatants have the right to the confidentiality of the information collected;10 \n Violence\/injury prevention: Cantonment is a strategy for reducing violence, because it aims to contain armed combatants until their weapons can be safely removed. However, there is a strong likelihood of violence within cantonment sites, especially when abducted women or girls are separated from men. Specific care should be taken to avoid all pos- sible situations that might lead to sexual violence; \n Mental health, psychosocial support and substance abuse:11 While cantonment provides an opportunity to check for the presence of self-directed violence such as drug and alcohol abuse, a key principle is that the best way of improving the mental well-being of ex- combatants and their associates is through economic and social reintegration, with com- munities having the central role in developing and implementing the social support systems needed to achieve this. In the demobilization stage of DDR, the health services must have the capacity to detect and treat severe, acute and chronic mental disorders. An evidence-based approach to substance abuse in DDR processes has still to be developed.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -185160,14 +185160,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.1. Dealing with key health concerns during demobilization", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Specific care should be taken to avoid all pos- sible situations that might lead to sexual violence; \\n Mental health, psychosocial support and substance abuse:11 While cantonment provides an opportunity to check for the presence of self-directed violence such as drug and alcohol abuse, a key principle is that the best way of improving the mental well-being of ex- combatants and their associates is through economic and social reintegration, with com- munities having the central role in developing and implementing the social support systems needed to achieve this.", + "Sentence": "Specific care should be taken to avoid all pos- sible situations that might lead to sexual violence; \n Mental health, psychosocial support and substance abuse:11 While cantonment provides an opportunity to check for the presence of self-directed violence such as drug and alcohol abuse, a key principle is that the best way of improving the mental well-being of ex- combatants and their associates is through economic and social reintegration, with com- munities having the central role in developing and implementing the social support systems needed to achieve this.", "newParagraph": "whenever people grouped together temporary facility cantonment site matter specific concern health practitioner issue aware include n chronic communicable disease proper compliance antitb treatment difficult organize sustain considered priority n hivaids screening soldier voluntary carried combatant given enough information screening process usefulness screening system able respond adequately providing antiretroviral therapy proper followup carefully thought combatant right confidentiality information collected10 n violenceinjury prevention cantonment strategy reducing violence aim contain armed combatant weapon safely removed however strong likelihood violence within cantonment site especially abducted woman girl separated men specific care taken avoid po sible situation might lead sexual violence n mental health psychosocial support substance abuse11 cantonment provides opportunity check presence selfdirected violence drug alcohol abuse key principle best way improving mental wellbeing ex combatant associate economic social reintegration com munities central role developing implementing social support system needed achieve demobilization stage ddr health service must capacity detect treat severe acute chronic mental disorder evidencebased approach substance abuse ddr process still developed", "ProcessedSent": "specific care taken avoid po sible situation might lead sexual violence n mental health psychosocial support substance abuse11 cantonment provides opportunity check presence selfdirected violence drug alcohol abuse key principle best way improving mental wellbeing ex combatant associate economic social reintegration com munities central role developing implementing social support system needed achieve", "SentID": 10286 }, { "ParagraphID": 2933, - "Paragraph": "Whenever people are grouped together in a temporary facility such as a cantonment site, there will be matters of specific concern to health practitioners. Issues to be aware of include: \\n Chronic communicable diseases: Proper compliance with anti-TB treatment can be difficult to organize and sustain, but it should be considered a priority; \\n HIV\/AIDS: Screening of soldiers should be voluntary and carried out after combatants are given enough information about the screening process. The usefulness of screening when the system is not able to respond adequately (by providing anti-retroviral therapy and proper follow-up) should be carefully thought out. Combatants have the right to the confidentiality of the information collected;10 \\n Violence\/injury prevention: Cantonment is a strategy for reducing violence, because it aims to contain armed combatants until their weapons can be safely removed. However, there is a strong likelihood of violence within cantonment sites, especially when abducted women or girls are separated from men. Specific care should be taken to avoid all pos- sible situations that might lead to sexual violence; \\n Mental health, psychosocial support and substance abuse:11 While cantonment provides an opportunity to check for the presence of self-directed violence such as drug and alcohol abuse, a key principle is that the best way of improving the mental well-being of ex- combatants and their associates is through economic and social reintegration, with com- munities having the central role in developing and implementing the social support systems needed to achieve this. In the demobilization stage of DDR, the health services must have the capacity to detect and treat severe, acute and chronic mental disorders. An evidence-based approach to substance abuse in DDR processes has still to be developed.", + "Paragraph": "Whenever people are grouped together in a temporary facility such as a cantonment site, there will be matters of specific concern to health practitioners. Issues to be aware of include: \n Chronic communicable diseases: Proper compliance with anti-TB treatment can be difficult to organize and sustain, but it should be considered a priority; \n HIV\/AIDS: Screening of soldiers should be voluntary and carried out after combatants are given enough information about the screening process. The usefulness of screening when the system is not able to respond adequately (by providing anti-retroviral therapy and proper follow-up) should be carefully thought out. Combatants have the right to the confidentiality of the information collected;10 \n Violence\/injury prevention: Cantonment is a strategy for reducing violence, because it aims to contain armed combatants until their weapons can be safely removed. However, there is a strong likelihood of violence within cantonment sites, especially when abducted women or girls are separated from men. Specific care should be taken to avoid all pos- sible situations that might lead to sexual violence; \n Mental health, psychosocial support and substance abuse:11 While cantonment provides an opportunity to check for the presence of self-directed violence such as drug and alcohol abuse, a key principle is that the best way of improving the mental well-being of ex- combatants and their associates is through economic and social reintegration, with com- munities having the central role in developing and implementing the social support systems needed to achieve this. In the demobilization stage of DDR, the health services must have the capacity to detect and treat severe, acute and chronic mental disorders. An evidence-based approach to substance abuse in DDR processes has still to be developed.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -185185,7 +185185,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2933, - "Paragraph": "Whenever people are grouped together in a temporary facility such as a cantonment site, there will be matters of specific concern to health practitioners. Issues to be aware of include: \\n Chronic communicable diseases: Proper compliance with anti-TB treatment can be difficult to organize and sustain, but it should be considered a priority; \\n HIV\/AIDS: Screening of soldiers should be voluntary and carried out after combatants are given enough information about the screening process. The usefulness of screening when the system is not able to respond adequately (by providing anti-retroviral therapy and proper follow-up) should be carefully thought out. Combatants have the right to the confidentiality of the information collected;10 \\n Violence\/injury prevention: Cantonment is a strategy for reducing violence, because it aims to contain armed combatants until their weapons can be safely removed. However, there is a strong likelihood of violence within cantonment sites, especially when abducted women or girls are separated from men. Specific care should be taken to avoid all pos- sible situations that might lead to sexual violence; \\n Mental health, psychosocial support and substance abuse:11 While cantonment provides an opportunity to check for the presence of self-directed violence such as drug and alcohol abuse, a key principle is that the best way of improving the mental well-being of ex- combatants and their associates is through economic and social reintegration, with com- munities having the central role in developing and implementing the social support systems needed to achieve this. In the demobilization stage of DDR, the health services must have the capacity to detect and treat severe, acute and chronic mental disorders. An evidence-based approach to substance abuse in DDR processes has still to be developed.", + "Paragraph": "Whenever people are grouped together in a temporary facility such as a cantonment site, there will be matters of specific concern to health practitioners. Issues to be aware of include: \n Chronic communicable diseases: Proper compliance with anti-TB treatment can be difficult to organize and sustain, but it should be considered a priority; \n HIV\/AIDS: Screening of soldiers should be voluntary and carried out after combatants are given enough information about the screening process. The usefulness of screening when the system is not able to respond adequately (by providing anti-retroviral therapy and proper follow-up) should be carefully thought out. Combatants have the right to the confidentiality of the information collected;10 \n Violence\/injury prevention: Cantonment is a strategy for reducing violence, because it aims to contain armed combatants until their weapons can be safely removed. However, there is a strong likelihood of violence within cantonment sites, especially when abducted women or girls are separated from men. Specific care should be taken to avoid all pos- sible situations that might lead to sexual violence; \n Mental health, psychosocial support and substance abuse:11 While cantonment provides an opportunity to check for the presence of self-directed violence such as drug and alcohol abuse, a key principle is that the best way of improving the mental well-being of ex- combatants and their associates is through economic and social reintegration, with com- munities having the central role in developing and implementing the social support systems needed to achieve this. In the demobilization stage of DDR, the health services must have the capacity to detect and treat severe, acute and chronic mental disorders. An evidence-based approach to substance abuse in DDR processes has still to be developed.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -185203,7 +185203,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2934, - "Paragraph": "In sites where resources are limited, health planning to meet the needs of those going through the DDR process starts from a minimum package of medical screening, on-the-spot treat- ment, provision of condoms and medical evacuation\/referral, which should be developed to cover, at least: \\n early detection of and response to epidemic outbreaks; \\n measles immunization + vitamin A for children aged 0\u201315 years; \\n polio immunization for children under 5; \\n treatment of severe, acute conditions (malaria, acute respiratory infections), diarrhoea, anaemia in pregnant women, acute malnutrition, dressing of wounds, STIs, etc.); \\n uncomplicated deliveries; \\n provision of long-lasting impregnated bed nets to prevent malaria; \\n referral of serious cases to secondary\/tertiary care facilities; \\n voluntary testing and counselling for STIs, including HIV\/AIDS; \\n care and treatment for survivors of sexual violence, including testing and treatment for STIs.", + "Paragraph": "In sites where resources are limited, health planning to meet the needs of those going through the DDR process starts from a minimum package of medical screening, on-the-spot treat- ment, provision of condoms and medical evacuation\/referral, which should be developed to cover, at least: \n early detection of and response to epidemic outbreaks; \n measles immunization + vitamin A for children aged 0\u201315 years; \n polio immunization for children under 5; \n treatment of severe, acute conditions (malaria, acute respiratory infections), diarrhoea, anaemia in pregnant women, acute malnutrition, dressing of wounds, STIs, etc.); \n uncomplicated deliveries; \n provision of long-lasting impregnated bed nets to prevent malaria; \n referral of serious cases to secondary\/tertiary care facilities; \n voluntary testing and counselling for STIs, including HIV\/AIDS; \n care and treatment for survivors of sexual violence, including testing and treatment for STIs.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -185214,14 +185214,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.2. An essential DDR health package in resource-poor settings", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "In sites where resources are limited, health planning to meet the needs of those going through the DDR process starts from a minimum package of medical screening, on-the-spot treat- ment, provision of condoms and medical evacuation\/referral, which should be developed to cover, at least: \\n early detection of and response to epidemic outbreaks; \\n measles immunization + vitamin A for children aged 0\u201315 years; \\n polio immunization for children under 5; \\n treatment of severe, acute conditions (malaria, acute respiratory infections), diarrhoea, anaemia in pregnant women, acute malnutrition, dressing of wounds, STIs, etc.", + "Sentence": "In sites where resources are limited, health planning to meet the needs of those going through the DDR process starts from a minimum package of medical screening, on-the-spot treat- ment, provision of condoms and medical evacuation\/referral, which should be developed to cover, at least: \n early detection of and response to epidemic outbreaks; \n measles immunization + vitamin A for children aged 0\u201315 years; \n polio immunization for children under 5; \n treatment of severe, acute conditions (malaria, acute respiratory infections), diarrhoea, anaemia in pregnant women, acute malnutrition, dressing of wounds, STIs, etc.", "newParagraph": "site resource limited health planning meet need going ddr process start minimum package medical screening onthespot treat ment provision condom medical evacuationreferral developed cover least n early detection response epidemic outbreak n measles immunization vitamin child aged 0 15 year n polio immunization child 5 n treatment severe acute condition malaria acute respiratory infection diarrhoea anaemia pregnant woman acute malnutrition dressing wound stis etc n uncomplicated delivery n provision longlasting impregnated bed net prevent malaria n referral serious case secondarytertiary care facility n voluntary testing counselling stis including hivaids n care treatment survivor sexual violence including testing treatment stis", "ProcessedSent": "site resource limited health planning meet need going ddr process start minimum package medical screening onthespot treat ment provision condom medical evacuationreferral developed cover least n early detection response epidemic outbreak n measles immunization vitamin child aged 0 15 year n polio immunization child 5 n treatment severe acute condition malaria acute respiratory infection diarrhoea anaemia pregnant woman acute malnutrition dressing wound stis etc", "SentID": 10289 }, { "ParagraphID": 2934, - "Paragraph": "In sites where resources are limited, health planning to meet the needs of those going through the DDR process starts from a minimum package of medical screening, on-the-spot treat- ment, provision of condoms and medical evacuation\/referral, which should be developed to cover, at least: \\n early detection of and response to epidemic outbreaks; \\n measles immunization + vitamin A for children aged 0\u201315 years; \\n polio immunization for children under 5; \\n treatment of severe, acute conditions (malaria, acute respiratory infections), diarrhoea, anaemia in pregnant women, acute malnutrition, dressing of wounds, STIs, etc.); \\n uncomplicated deliveries; \\n provision of long-lasting impregnated bed nets to prevent malaria; \\n referral of serious cases to secondary\/tertiary care facilities; \\n voluntary testing and counselling for STIs, including HIV\/AIDS; \\n care and treatment for survivors of sexual violence, including testing and treatment for STIs.", + "Paragraph": "In sites where resources are limited, health planning to meet the needs of those going through the DDR process starts from a minimum package of medical screening, on-the-spot treat- ment, provision of condoms and medical evacuation\/referral, which should be developed to cover, at least: \n early detection of and response to epidemic outbreaks; \n measles immunization + vitamin A for children aged 0\u201315 years; \n polio immunization for children under 5; \n treatment of severe, acute conditions (malaria, acute respiratory infections), diarrhoea, anaemia in pregnant women, acute malnutrition, dressing of wounds, STIs, etc.); \n uncomplicated deliveries; \n provision of long-lasting impregnated bed nets to prevent malaria; \n referral of serious cases to secondary\/tertiary care facilities; \n voluntary testing and counselling for STIs, including HIV\/AIDS; \n care and treatment for survivors of sexual violence, including testing and treatment for STIs.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -185232,14 +185232,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.2. An essential DDR health package in resource-poor settings", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "); \\n uncomplicated deliveries; \\n provision of long-lasting impregnated bed nets to prevent malaria; \\n referral of serious cases to secondary\/tertiary care facilities; \\n voluntary testing and counselling for STIs, including HIV\/AIDS; \\n care and treatment for survivors of sexual violence, including testing and treatment for STIs.", + "Sentence": "); \n uncomplicated deliveries; \n provision of long-lasting impregnated bed nets to prevent malaria; \n referral of serious cases to secondary\/tertiary care facilities; \n voluntary testing and counselling for STIs, including HIV\/AIDS; \n care and treatment for survivors of sexual violence, including testing and treatment for STIs.", "newParagraph": "site resource limited health planning meet need going ddr process start minimum package medical screening onthespot treat ment provision condom medical evacuationreferral developed cover least n early detection response epidemic outbreak n measles immunization vitamin child aged 0 15 year n polio immunization child 5 n treatment severe acute condition malaria acute respiratory infection diarrhoea anaemia pregnant woman acute malnutrition dressing wound stis etc n uncomplicated delivery n provision longlasting impregnated bed net prevent malaria n referral serious case secondarytertiary care facility n voluntary testing counselling stis including hivaids n care treatment survivor sexual violence including testing treatment stis", "ProcessedSent": " n uncomplicated delivery n provision longlasting impregnated bed net prevent malaria n referral serious case secondarytertiary care facility n voluntary testing counselling stis including hivaids n care treatment survivor sexual violence including testing treatment stis", "SentID": 10290 }, { "ParagraphID": 2935, - "Paragraph": "The delivery of such services requires the following personnel and equipment in each cantonment site or assembly area: \\n an average team of one doctor or mid-level health technician, 4\u20135 public health care nurses and 3\u20134 ancillary workers per camp; one midwife where necessary; \\n essential medicines and equipment (for sterilization, stabilization, cold-chain, etc.); \\n rapid tests and combined treatment for P. Falciparum malaria; \\n means of transport, easy procedures and pre-positioned facilities for medical\/obstetric evacuation; \\n options \u2014 either locally or by referral \u2014 for the treatment of chronic conditions: at least TB and epilepsy should be covered; \\n back-up systems \u2014 teams on call, easy-access procedures, transport and buffer stocks (including protective equipment) \u2014 for early detection and treatment of outbreaks; \\n availability and adoption of national standard case definitions and case management protocols.12", + "Paragraph": "The delivery of such services requires the following personnel and equipment in each cantonment site or assembly area: \n an average team of one doctor or mid-level health technician, 4\u20135 public health care nurses and 3\u20134 ancillary workers per camp; one midwife where necessary; \n essential medicines and equipment (for sterilization, stabilization, cold-chain, etc.); \n rapid tests and combined treatment for P. Falciparum malaria; \n means of transport, easy procedures and pre-positioned facilities for medical\/obstetric evacuation; \n options \u2014 either locally or by referral \u2014 for the treatment of chronic conditions: at least TB and epilepsy should be covered; \n back-up systems \u2014 teams on call, easy-access procedures, transport and buffer stocks (including protective equipment) \u2014 for early detection and treatment of outbreaks; \n availability and adoption of national standard case definitions and case management protocols.12", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -185250,14 +185250,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.2. An essential DDR health package in resource-poor settings", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The delivery of such services requires the following personnel and equipment in each cantonment site or assembly area: \\n an average team of one doctor or mid-level health technician, 4\u20135 public health care nurses and 3\u20134 ancillary workers per camp; one midwife where necessary; \\n essential medicines and equipment (for sterilization, stabilization, cold-chain, etc.", + "Sentence": "The delivery of such services requires the following personnel and equipment in each cantonment site or assembly area: \n an average team of one doctor or mid-level health technician, 4\u20135 public health care nurses and 3\u20134 ancillary workers per camp; one midwife where necessary; \n essential medicines and equipment (for sterilization, stabilization, cold-chain, etc.", "newParagraph": "delivery service requires following personnel equipment cantonment site assembly area n average team one doctor midlevel health technician 4 5 public health care nurse 3 4 ancillary worker per camp one midwife necessary n essential medicine equipment sterilization stabilization coldchain etc n rapid test combined treatment p falciparum malaria n mean transport easy procedure prepositioned facility medicalobstetric evacuation n option either locally referral treatment chronic condition least tb epilepsy covered n backup system team call easyaccess procedure transport buffer stock including protective equipment early detection treatment outbreak n availability adoption national standard case definition case management protocols12", "ProcessedSent": "delivery service requires following personnel equipment cantonment site assembly area n average team one doctor midlevel health technician 4 5 public health care nurse 3 4 ancillary worker per camp one midwife necessary n essential medicine equipment sterilization stabilization coldchain etc", "SentID": 10291 }, { "ParagraphID": 2935, - "Paragraph": "The delivery of such services requires the following personnel and equipment in each cantonment site or assembly area: \\n an average team of one doctor or mid-level health technician, 4\u20135 public health care nurses and 3\u20134 ancillary workers per camp; one midwife where necessary; \\n essential medicines and equipment (for sterilization, stabilization, cold-chain, etc.); \\n rapid tests and combined treatment for P. Falciparum malaria; \\n means of transport, easy procedures and pre-positioned facilities for medical\/obstetric evacuation; \\n options \u2014 either locally or by referral \u2014 for the treatment of chronic conditions: at least TB and epilepsy should be covered; \\n back-up systems \u2014 teams on call, easy-access procedures, transport and buffer stocks (including protective equipment) \u2014 for early detection and treatment of outbreaks; \\n availability and adoption of national standard case definitions and case management protocols.12", + "Paragraph": "The delivery of such services requires the following personnel and equipment in each cantonment site or assembly area: \n an average team of one doctor or mid-level health technician, 4\u20135 public health care nurses and 3\u20134 ancillary workers per camp; one midwife where necessary; \n essential medicines and equipment (for sterilization, stabilization, cold-chain, etc.); \n rapid tests and combined treatment for P. Falciparum malaria; \n means of transport, easy procedures and pre-positioned facilities for medical\/obstetric evacuation; \n options \u2014 either locally or by referral \u2014 for the treatment of chronic conditions: at least TB and epilepsy should be covered; \n back-up systems \u2014 teams on call, easy-access procedures, transport and buffer stocks (including protective equipment) \u2014 for early detection and treatment of outbreaks; \n availability and adoption of national standard case definitions and case management protocols.12", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -185268,7 +185268,7 @@ "Heading2": "8.2. An essential DDR health package in resource-poor settings", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "); \\n rapid tests and combined treatment for P. Falciparum malaria; \\n means of transport, easy procedures and pre-positioned facilities for medical\/obstetric evacuation; \\n options \u2014 either locally or by referral \u2014 for the treatment of chronic conditions: at least TB and epilepsy should be covered; \\n back-up systems \u2014 teams on call, easy-access procedures, transport and buffer stocks (including protective equipment) \u2014 for early detection and treatment of outbreaks; \\n availability and adoption of national standard case definitions and case management protocols.12", + "Sentence": "); \n rapid tests and combined treatment for P. Falciparum malaria; \n means of transport, easy procedures and pre-positioned facilities for medical\/obstetric evacuation; \n options \u2014 either locally or by referral \u2014 for the treatment of chronic conditions: at least TB and epilepsy should be covered; \n back-up systems \u2014 teams on call, easy-access procedures, transport and buffer stocks (including protective equipment) \u2014 for early detection and treatment of outbreaks; \n availability and adoption of national standard case definitions and case management protocols.12", "newParagraph": "delivery service requires following personnel equipment cantonment site assembly area n average team one doctor midlevel health technician 4 5 public health care nurse 3 4 ancillary worker per camp one midwife necessary n essential medicine equipment sterilization stabilization coldchain etc n rapid test combined treatment p falciparum malaria n mean transport easy procedure prepositioned facility medicalobstetric evacuation n option either locally referral treatment chronic condition least tb epilepsy covered n backup system team call easyaccess procedure transport buffer stock including protective equipment early detection treatment outbreak n availability adoption national standard case definition case management protocols12", "ProcessedSent": " n rapid test combined treatment p falciparum malaria n mean transport easy procedure prepositioned facility medicalobstetric evacuation n option either locally referral treatment chronic condition least tb epilepsy covered n backup system team call easyaccess procedure transport buffer stock including protective equipment early detection treatment outbreak n availability adoption national standard case definition case management protocols12", "SentID": 10292 @@ -185401,7 +185401,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2939, - "Paragraph": "The following questions can guide this assessment process: \\n What kinds of capacity are needed for each health service delivery point (tent-to-tent active case finding and\/or specific health promotion messages, health posts within camps, referral health centre\/hospital)? \\n Which mix of health workers and how many are needed at each of these delivery points? (The WHO recommended standard is 60 health workers for each 10,000 members of the target population.) \\n Are there national standard case definitions and case management protocols available, and is there any need to adapt these to the specific circumstances of DDR? \\n Is there a need to define or agree to specific public health intervention(s) at national level to respond to or prevent any public health threats (e.g., sleeping sickness mass screening to prevent the spread of the diseases during the quartering process)?", + "Paragraph": "The following questions can guide this assessment process: \n What kinds of capacity are needed for each health service delivery point (tent-to-tent active case finding and\/or specific health promotion messages, health posts within camps, referral health centre\/hospital)? \n Which mix of health workers and how many are needed at each of these delivery points? (The WHO recommended standard is 60 health workers for each 10,000 members of the target population.) \n Are there national standard case definitions and case management protocols available, and is there any need to adapt these to the specific circumstances of DDR? \n Is there a need to define or agree to specific public health intervention(s) at national level to respond to or prevent any public health threats (e.g., sleeping sickness mass screening to prevent the spread of the diseases during the quartering process)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -185412,14 +185412,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.3. Training of personnel", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The following questions can guide this assessment process: \\n What kinds of capacity are needed for each health service delivery point (tent-to-tent active case finding and\/or specific health promotion messages, health posts within camps, referral health centre\/hospital)?", + "Sentence": "The following questions can guide this assessment process: \n What kinds of capacity are needed for each health service delivery point (tent-to-tent active case finding and\/or specific health promotion messages, health posts within camps, referral health centre\/hospital)?", "newParagraph": "following question guide assessment process n kind capacity needed health service delivery point tenttotent active case finding andor specific health promotion message health post within camp referral health centrehospital n mix health worker many needed delivery point recommended standard 60 health worker 10000 member target population n national standard case definition case management protocol available need adapt specific circumstance ddr n need define agree specific public health intervention national level respond prevent public health threat eg sleeping sickness mass screening prevent spread disease quartering process", "ProcessedSent": "following question guide assessment process n kind capacity needed health service delivery point tenttotent active case finding andor specific health promotion message health post within camp referral health centrehospital", "SentID": 10300 }, { "ParagraphID": 2939, - "Paragraph": "The following questions can guide this assessment process: \\n What kinds of capacity are needed for each health service delivery point (tent-to-tent active case finding and\/or specific health promotion messages, health posts within camps, referral health centre\/hospital)? \\n Which mix of health workers and how many are needed at each of these delivery points? (The WHO recommended standard is 60 health workers for each 10,000 members of the target population.) \\n Are there national standard case definitions and case management protocols available, and is there any need to adapt these to the specific circumstances of DDR? \\n Is there a need to define or agree to specific public health intervention(s) at national level to respond to or prevent any public health threats (e.g., sleeping sickness mass screening to prevent the spread of the diseases during the quartering process)?", + "Paragraph": "The following questions can guide this assessment process: \n What kinds of capacity are needed for each health service delivery point (tent-to-tent active case finding and\/or specific health promotion messages, health posts within camps, referral health centre\/hospital)? \n Which mix of health workers and how many are needed at each of these delivery points? (The WHO recommended standard is 60 health workers for each 10,000 members of the target population.) \n Are there national standard case definitions and case management protocols available, and is there any need to adapt these to the specific circumstances of DDR? \n Is there a need to define or agree to specific public health intervention(s) at national level to respond to or prevent any public health threats (e.g., sleeping sickness mass screening to prevent the spread of the diseases during the quartering process)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -185430,14 +185430,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.3. Training of personnel", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Which mix of health workers and how many are needed at each of these delivery points?", + "Sentence": "\n Which mix of health workers and how many are needed at each of these delivery points?", "newParagraph": "following question guide assessment process n kind capacity needed health service delivery point tenttotent active case finding andor specific health promotion message health post within camp referral health centrehospital n mix health worker many needed delivery point recommended standard 60 health worker 10000 member target population n national standard case definition case management protocol available need adapt specific circumstance ddr n need define agree specific public health intervention national level respond prevent public health threat eg sleeping sickness mass screening prevent spread disease quartering process", "ProcessedSent": "n mix health worker many needed delivery point", "SentID": 10301 }, { "ParagraphID": 2939, - "Paragraph": "The following questions can guide this assessment process: \\n What kinds of capacity are needed for each health service delivery point (tent-to-tent active case finding and\/or specific health promotion messages, health posts within camps, referral health centre\/hospital)? \\n Which mix of health workers and how many are needed at each of these delivery points? (The WHO recommended standard is 60 health workers for each 10,000 members of the target population.) \\n Are there national standard case definitions and case management protocols available, and is there any need to adapt these to the specific circumstances of DDR? \\n Is there a need to define or agree to specific public health intervention(s) at national level to respond to or prevent any public health threats (e.g., sleeping sickness mass screening to prevent the spread of the diseases during the quartering process)?", + "Paragraph": "The following questions can guide this assessment process: \n What kinds of capacity are needed for each health service delivery point (tent-to-tent active case finding and\/or specific health promotion messages, health posts within camps, referral health centre\/hospital)? \n Which mix of health workers and how many are needed at each of these delivery points? (The WHO recommended standard is 60 health workers for each 10,000 members of the target population.) \n Are there national standard case definitions and case management protocols available, and is there any need to adapt these to the specific circumstances of DDR? \n Is there a need to define or agree to specific public health intervention(s) at national level to respond to or prevent any public health threats (e.g., sleeping sickness mass screening to prevent the spread of the diseases during the quartering process)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -185455,7 +185455,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2939, - "Paragraph": "The following questions can guide this assessment process: \\n What kinds of capacity are needed for each health service delivery point (tent-to-tent active case finding and\/or specific health promotion messages, health posts within camps, referral health centre\/hospital)? \\n Which mix of health workers and how many are needed at each of these delivery points? (The WHO recommended standard is 60 health workers for each 10,000 members of the target population.) \\n Are there national standard case definitions and case management protocols available, and is there any need to adapt these to the specific circumstances of DDR? \\n Is there a need to define or agree to specific public health intervention(s) at national level to respond to or prevent any public health threats (e.g., sleeping sickness mass screening to prevent the spread of the diseases during the quartering process)?", + "Paragraph": "The following questions can guide this assessment process: \n What kinds of capacity are needed for each health service delivery point (tent-to-tent active case finding and\/or specific health promotion messages, health posts within camps, referral health centre\/hospital)? \n Which mix of health workers and how many are needed at each of these delivery points? (The WHO recommended standard is 60 health workers for each 10,000 members of the target population.) \n Are there national standard case definitions and case management protocols available, and is there any need to adapt these to the specific circumstances of DDR? \n Is there a need to define or agree to specific public health intervention(s) at national level to respond to or prevent any public health threats (e.g., sleeping sickness mass screening to prevent the spread of the diseases during the quartering process)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -185466,14 +185466,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.3. Training of personnel", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Are there national standard case definitions and case management protocols available, and is there any need to adapt these to the specific circumstances of DDR?", + "Sentence": "\n Are there national standard case definitions and case management protocols available, and is there any need to adapt these to the specific circumstances of DDR?", "newParagraph": "following question guide assessment process n kind capacity needed health service delivery point tenttotent active case finding andor specific health promotion message health post within camp referral health centrehospital n mix health worker many needed delivery point recommended standard 60 health worker 10000 member target population n national standard case definition case management protocol available need adapt specific circumstance ddr n need define agree specific public health intervention national level respond prevent public health threat eg sleeping sickness mass screening prevent spread disease quartering process", "ProcessedSent": "n national standard case definition case management protocol available need adapt specific circumstance ddr", "SentID": 10303 }, { "ParagraphID": 2939, - "Paragraph": "The following questions can guide this assessment process: \\n What kinds of capacity are needed for each health service delivery point (tent-to-tent active case finding and\/or specific health promotion messages, health posts within camps, referral health centre\/hospital)? \\n Which mix of health workers and how many are needed at each of these delivery points? (The WHO recommended standard is 60 health workers for each 10,000 members of the target population.) \\n Are there national standard case definitions and case management protocols available, and is there any need to adapt these to the specific circumstances of DDR? \\n Is there a need to define or agree to specific public health intervention(s) at national level to respond to or prevent any public health threats (e.g., sleeping sickness mass screening to prevent the spread of the diseases during the quartering process)?", + "Paragraph": "The following questions can guide this assessment process: \n What kinds of capacity are needed for each health service delivery point (tent-to-tent active case finding and\/or specific health promotion messages, health posts within camps, referral health centre\/hospital)? \n Which mix of health workers and how many are needed at each of these delivery points? (The WHO recommended standard is 60 health workers for each 10,000 members of the target population.) \n Are there national standard case definitions and case management protocols available, and is there any need to adapt these to the specific circumstances of DDR? \n Is there a need to define or agree to specific public health intervention(s) at national level to respond to or prevent any public health threats (e.g., sleeping sickness mass screening to prevent the spread of the diseases during the quartering process)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -185484,7 +185484,7 @@ "Heading2": "8.3. Training of personnel", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Is there a need to define or agree to specific public health intervention(s) at national level to respond to or prevent any public health threats (e.g., sleeping sickness mass screening to prevent the spread of the diseases during the quartering process)?", + "Sentence": "\n Is there a need to define or agree to specific public health intervention(s) at national level to respond to or prevent any public health threats (e.g., sleeping sickness mass screening to prevent the spread of the diseases during the quartering process)?", "newParagraph": "following question guide assessment process n kind capacity needed health service delivery point tenttotent active case finding andor specific health promotion message health post within camp referral health centrehospital n mix health worker many needed delivery point recommended standard 60 health worker 10000 member target population n national standard case definition case management protocol available need adapt specific circumstance ddr n need define agree specific public health intervention national level respond prevent public health threat eg sleeping sickness mass screening prevent spread disease quartering process", "ProcessedSent": "n need define agree specific public health intervention national level respond prevent public health threat eg sleeping sickness mass screening prevent spread disease quartering process", "SentID": 10304 @@ -185527,7 +185527,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2941, - "Paragraph": "Special arrangements will be necessary for vulnerable groups. WHO recommends planning for children, the elderly, chronically sick and disabled people, as well as for women and girls who are pregnant or lactating, and anyone who has survived sexual violence. Guiding questions to assess the specific needs of each of these groups are as follows: \\n What are the specific health needs of these groups? \\n Do they need special interventions? \\n Are health personnel aware of their specific needs? \\n Are health personnel trained to assist individuals who have survived extreme inter- personal violence and have symptoms that they may be unable or unwilling to describe (e.g., survivors of rape describing \u2018stomach pains\u2019)?", + "Paragraph": "Special arrangements will be necessary for vulnerable groups. WHO recommends planning for children, the elderly, chronically sick and disabled people, as well as for women and girls who are pregnant or lactating, and anyone who has survived sexual violence. Guiding questions to assess the specific needs of each of these groups are as follows: \n What are the specific health needs of these groups? \n Do they need special interventions? \n Are health personnel aware of their specific needs? \n Are health personnel trained to assist individuals who have survived extreme inter- personal violence and have symptoms that they may be unable or unwilling to describe (e.g., survivors of rape describing \u2018stomach pains\u2019)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -185545,7 +185545,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2941, - "Paragraph": "Special arrangements will be necessary for vulnerable groups. WHO recommends planning for children, the elderly, chronically sick and disabled people, as well as for women and girls who are pregnant or lactating, and anyone who has survived sexual violence. Guiding questions to assess the specific needs of each of these groups are as follows: \\n What are the specific health needs of these groups? \\n Do they need special interventions? \\n Are health personnel aware of their specific needs? \\n Are health personnel trained to assist individuals who have survived extreme inter- personal violence and have symptoms that they may be unable or unwilling to describe (e.g., survivors of rape describing \u2018stomach pains\u2019)?", + "Paragraph": "Special arrangements will be necessary for vulnerable groups. WHO recommends planning for children, the elderly, chronically sick and disabled people, as well as for women and girls who are pregnant or lactating, and anyone who has survived sexual violence. Guiding questions to assess the specific needs of each of these groups are as follows: \n What are the specific health needs of these groups? \n Do they need special interventions? \n Are health personnel aware of their specific needs? \n Are health personnel trained to assist individuals who have survived extreme inter- personal violence and have symptoms that they may be unable or unwilling to describe (e.g., survivors of rape describing \u2018stomach pains\u2019)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -185563,7 +185563,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2941, - "Paragraph": "Special arrangements will be necessary for vulnerable groups. WHO recommends planning for children, the elderly, chronically sick and disabled people, as well as for women and girls who are pregnant or lactating, and anyone who has survived sexual violence. Guiding questions to assess the specific needs of each of these groups are as follows: \\n What are the specific health needs of these groups? \\n Do they need special interventions? \\n Are health personnel aware of their specific needs? \\n Are health personnel trained to assist individuals who have survived extreme inter- personal violence and have symptoms that they may be unable or unwilling to describe (e.g., survivors of rape describing \u2018stomach pains\u2019)?", + "Paragraph": "Special arrangements will be necessary for vulnerable groups. WHO recommends planning for children, the elderly, chronically sick and disabled people, as well as for women and girls who are pregnant or lactating, and anyone who has survived sexual violence. Guiding questions to assess the specific needs of each of these groups are as follows: \n What are the specific health needs of these groups? \n Do they need special interventions? \n Are health personnel aware of their specific needs? \n Are health personnel trained to assist individuals who have survived extreme inter- personal violence and have symptoms that they may be unable or unwilling to describe (e.g., survivors of rape describing \u2018stomach pains\u2019)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -185574,14 +185574,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.4. Responding to the needs of vulnerable groups", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Guiding questions to assess the specific needs of each of these groups are as follows: \\n What are the specific health needs of these groups?", + "Sentence": "Guiding questions to assess the specific needs of each of these groups are as follows: \n What are the specific health needs of these groups?", "newParagraph": "special arrangement necessary vulnerable group recommends planning child elderly chronically sick disabled people well woman girl pregnant lactating anyone survived sexual violence guiding question ass specific need group follows n specific health need group n need special intervention n health personnel aware specific need n health personnel trained assist individual survived extreme inter personal violence symptom may unable unwilling describe eg survivor rape describing stomach pain ", "ProcessedSent": "guiding question ass specific need group follows n specific health need group", "SentID": 10309 }, { "ParagraphID": 2941, - "Paragraph": "Special arrangements will be necessary for vulnerable groups. WHO recommends planning for children, the elderly, chronically sick and disabled people, as well as for women and girls who are pregnant or lactating, and anyone who has survived sexual violence. Guiding questions to assess the specific needs of each of these groups are as follows: \\n What are the specific health needs of these groups? \\n Do they need special interventions? \\n Are health personnel aware of their specific needs? \\n Are health personnel trained to assist individuals who have survived extreme inter- personal violence and have symptoms that they may be unable or unwilling to describe (e.g., survivors of rape describing \u2018stomach pains\u2019)?", + "Paragraph": "Special arrangements will be necessary for vulnerable groups. WHO recommends planning for children, the elderly, chronically sick and disabled people, as well as for women and girls who are pregnant or lactating, and anyone who has survived sexual violence. Guiding questions to assess the specific needs of each of these groups are as follows: \n What are the specific health needs of these groups? \n Do they need special interventions? \n Are health personnel aware of their specific needs? \n Are health personnel trained to assist individuals who have survived extreme inter- personal violence and have symptoms that they may be unable or unwilling to describe (e.g., survivors of rape describing \u2018stomach pains\u2019)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -185592,14 +185592,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.4. Responding to the needs of vulnerable groups", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Do they need special interventions?", + "Sentence": "\n Do they need special interventions?", "newParagraph": "special arrangement necessary vulnerable group recommends planning child elderly chronically sick disabled people well woman girl pregnant lactating anyone survived sexual violence guiding question ass specific need group follows n specific health need group n need special intervention n health personnel aware specific need n health personnel trained assist individual survived extreme inter personal violence symptom may unable unwilling describe eg survivor rape describing stomach pain ", "ProcessedSent": "n need special intervention", "SentID": 10310 }, { "ParagraphID": 2941, - "Paragraph": "Special arrangements will be necessary for vulnerable groups. WHO recommends planning for children, the elderly, chronically sick and disabled people, as well as for women and girls who are pregnant or lactating, and anyone who has survived sexual violence. Guiding questions to assess the specific needs of each of these groups are as follows: \\n What are the specific health needs of these groups? \\n Do they need special interventions? \\n Are health personnel aware of their specific needs? \\n Are health personnel trained to assist individuals who have survived extreme inter- personal violence and have symptoms that they may be unable or unwilling to describe (e.g., survivors of rape describing \u2018stomach pains\u2019)?", + "Paragraph": "Special arrangements will be necessary for vulnerable groups. WHO recommends planning for children, the elderly, chronically sick and disabled people, as well as for women and girls who are pregnant or lactating, and anyone who has survived sexual violence. Guiding questions to assess the specific needs of each of these groups are as follows: \n What are the specific health needs of these groups? \n Do they need special interventions? \n Are health personnel aware of their specific needs? \n Are health personnel trained to assist individuals who have survived extreme inter- personal violence and have symptoms that they may be unable or unwilling to describe (e.g., survivors of rape describing \u2018stomach pains\u2019)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -185610,14 +185610,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.4. Responding to the needs of vulnerable groups", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Are health personnel aware of their specific needs?", + "Sentence": "\n Are health personnel aware of their specific needs?", "newParagraph": "special arrangement necessary vulnerable group recommends planning child elderly chronically sick disabled people well woman girl pregnant lactating anyone survived sexual violence guiding question ass specific need group follows n specific health need group n need special intervention n health personnel aware specific need n health personnel trained assist individual survived extreme inter personal violence symptom may unable unwilling describe eg survivor rape describing stomach pain ", "ProcessedSent": "n health personnel aware specific need", "SentID": 10311 }, { "ParagraphID": 2941, - "Paragraph": "Special arrangements will be necessary for vulnerable groups. WHO recommends planning for children, the elderly, chronically sick and disabled people, as well as for women and girls who are pregnant or lactating, and anyone who has survived sexual violence. Guiding questions to assess the specific needs of each of these groups are as follows: \\n What are the specific health needs of these groups? \\n Do they need special interventions? \\n Are health personnel aware of their specific needs? \\n Are health personnel trained to assist individuals who have survived extreme inter- personal violence and have symptoms that they may be unable or unwilling to describe (e.g., survivors of rape describing \u2018stomach pains\u2019)?", + "Paragraph": "Special arrangements will be necessary for vulnerable groups. WHO recommends planning for children, the elderly, chronically sick and disabled people, as well as for women and girls who are pregnant or lactating, and anyone who has survived sexual violence. Guiding questions to assess the specific needs of each of these groups are as follows: \n What are the specific health needs of these groups? \n Do they need special interventions? \n Are health personnel aware of their specific needs? \n Are health personnel trained to assist individuals who have survived extreme inter- personal violence and have symptoms that they may be unable or unwilling to describe (e.g., survivors of rape describing \u2018stomach pains\u2019)?", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -185628,14 +185628,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.4. Responding to the needs of vulnerable groups", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Are health personnel trained to assist individuals who have survived extreme inter- personal violence and have symptoms that they may be unable or unwilling to describe (e.g., survivors of rape describing \u2018stomach pains\u2019)?", + "Sentence": "\n Are health personnel trained to assist individuals who have survived extreme inter- personal violence and have symptoms that they may be unable or unwilling to describe (e.g., survivors of rape describing \u2018stomach pains\u2019)?", "newParagraph": "special arrangement necessary vulnerable group recommends planning child elderly chronically sick disabled people well woman girl pregnant lactating anyone survived sexual violence guiding question ass specific need group follows n specific health need group n need special intervention n health personnel aware specific need n health personnel trained assist individual survived extreme inter personal violence symptom may unable unwilling describe eg survivor rape describing stomach pain ", "ProcessedSent": "n health personnel trained assist individual survived extreme inter personal violence symptom may unable unwilling describe eg survivor rape describing stomach pain ", "SentID": 10312 }, { "ParagraphID": 2942, - "Paragraph": "Boy and girl child and adolescent soldiers can range in age from 6 to 18. It is very likely that they have been exposed to a variety of physical and psychological traumas, including mental and sexual abuse, and that they have had very limited access to clinical and public health services. Child and adolescent soldiers, who are often brutally recruited from very poor communities, or orphaned, are already in a poor state of health before they face the additional hardship of life with an armed group or force. Their vulnerability remains high during the DDR process, and health services should therefore deal with their specific needs as a priority. Special attention should be given to problems that may cause the child fear, embarrassment or stigmatization, e.g.: \\n child and adolescent care and support services should offer a special focus on trauma- related stress disorders, depression and anxiety; \\n treatment should be provided for drug and alcohol addiction; \\n there should be services for the prevention, early detection and clinical management of STIs and HIV\/AIDS; \\n special assistance should be offered to girls and boys for the treatment and clinical management of the consequences of sexual abuse, and every effort should be made to prevent sexual abuse taking place, with due respect for confidentiality.14", + "Paragraph": "Boy and girl child and adolescent soldiers can range in age from 6 to 18. It is very likely that they have been exposed to a variety of physical and psychological traumas, including mental and sexual abuse, and that they have had very limited access to clinical and public health services. Child and adolescent soldiers, who are often brutally recruited from very poor communities, or orphaned, are already in a poor state of health before they face the additional hardship of life with an armed group or force. Their vulnerability remains high during the DDR process, and health services should therefore deal with their specific needs as a priority. Special attention should be given to problems that may cause the child fear, embarrassment or stigmatization, e.g.: \n child and adolescent care and support services should offer a special focus on trauma- related stress disorders, depression and anxiety; \n treatment should be provided for drug and alcohol addiction; \n there should be services for the prevention, early detection and clinical management of STIs and HIV\/AIDS; \n special assistance should be offered to girls and boys for the treatment and clinical management of the consequences of sexual abuse, and every effort should be made to prevent sexual abuse taking place, with due respect for confidentiality.14", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -185653,7 +185653,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2942, - "Paragraph": "Boy and girl child and adolescent soldiers can range in age from 6 to 18. It is very likely that they have been exposed to a variety of physical and psychological traumas, including mental and sexual abuse, and that they have had very limited access to clinical and public health services. Child and adolescent soldiers, who are often brutally recruited from very poor communities, or orphaned, are already in a poor state of health before they face the additional hardship of life with an armed group or force. Their vulnerability remains high during the DDR process, and health services should therefore deal with their specific needs as a priority. Special attention should be given to problems that may cause the child fear, embarrassment or stigmatization, e.g.: \\n child and adolescent care and support services should offer a special focus on trauma- related stress disorders, depression and anxiety; \\n treatment should be provided for drug and alcohol addiction; \\n there should be services for the prevention, early detection and clinical management of STIs and HIV\/AIDS; \\n special assistance should be offered to girls and boys for the treatment and clinical management of the consequences of sexual abuse, and every effort should be made to prevent sexual abuse taking place, with due respect for confidentiality.14", + "Paragraph": "Boy and girl child and adolescent soldiers can range in age from 6 to 18. It is very likely that they have been exposed to a variety of physical and psychological traumas, including mental and sexual abuse, and that they have had very limited access to clinical and public health services. Child and adolescent soldiers, who are often brutally recruited from very poor communities, or orphaned, are already in a poor state of health before they face the additional hardship of life with an armed group or force. Their vulnerability remains high during the DDR process, and health services should therefore deal with their specific needs as a priority. Special attention should be given to problems that may cause the child fear, embarrassment or stigmatization, e.g.: \n child and adolescent care and support services should offer a special focus on trauma- related stress disorders, depression and anxiety; \n treatment should be provided for drug and alcohol addiction; \n there should be services for the prevention, early detection and clinical management of STIs and HIV\/AIDS; \n special assistance should be offered to girls and boys for the treatment and clinical management of the consequences of sexual abuse, and every effort should be made to prevent sexual abuse taking place, with due respect for confidentiality.14", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -185671,7 +185671,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2942, - "Paragraph": "Boy and girl child and adolescent soldiers can range in age from 6 to 18. It is very likely that they have been exposed to a variety of physical and psychological traumas, including mental and sexual abuse, and that they have had very limited access to clinical and public health services. Child and adolescent soldiers, who are often brutally recruited from very poor communities, or orphaned, are already in a poor state of health before they face the additional hardship of life with an armed group or force. Their vulnerability remains high during the DDR process, and health services should therefore deal with their specific needs as a priority. Special attention should be given to problems that may cause the child fear, embarrassment or stigmatization, e.g.: \\n child and adolescent care and support services should offer a special focus on trauma- related stress disorders, depression and anxiety; \\n treatment should be provided for drug and alcohol addiction; \\n there should be services for the prevention, early detection and clinical management of STIs and HIV\/AIDS; \\n special assistance should be offered to girls and boys for the treatment and clinical management of the consequences of sexual abuse, and every effort should be made to prevent sexual abuse taking place, with due respect for confidentiality.14", + "Paragraph": "Boy and girl child and adolescent soldiers can range in age from 6 to 18. It is very likely that they have been exposed to a variety of physical and psychological traumas, including mental and sexual abuse, and that they have had very limited access to clinical and public health services. Child and adolescent soldiers, who are often brutally recruited from very poor communities, or orphaned, are already in a poor state of health before they face the additional hardship of life with an armed group or force. Their vulnerability remains high during the DDR process, and health services should therefore deal with their specific needs as a priority. Special attention should be given to problems that may cause the child fear, embarrassment or stigmatization, e.g.: \n child and adolescent care and support services should offer a special focus on trauma- related stress disorders, depression and anxiety; \n treatment should be provided for drug and alcohol addiction; \n there should be services for the prevention, early detection and clinical management of STIs and HIV\/AIDS; \n special assistance should be offered to girls and boys for the treatment and clinical management of the consequences of sexual abuse, and every effort should be made to prevent sexual abuse taking place, with due respect for confidentiality.14", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -185689,7 +185689,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2942, - "Paragraph": "Boy and girl child and adolescent soldiers can range in age from 6 to 18. It is very likely that they have been exposed to a variety of physical and psychological traumas, including mental and sexual abuse, and that they have had very limited access to clinical and public health services. Child and adolescent soldiers, who are often brutally recruited from very poor communities, or orphaned, are already in a poor state of health before they face the additional hardship of life with an armed group or force. Their vulnerability remains high during the DDR process, and health services should therefore deal with their specific needs as a priority. Special attention should be given to problems that may cause the child fear, embarrassment or stigmatization, e.g.: \\n child and adolescent care and support services should offer a special focus on trauma- related stress disorders, depression and anxiety; \\n treatment should be provided for drug and alcohol addiction; \\n there should be services for the prevention, early detection and clinical management of STIs and HIV\/AIDS; \\n special assistance should be offered to girls and boys for the treatment and clinical management of the consequences of sexual abuse, and every effort should be made to prevent sexual abuse taking place, with due respect for confidentiality.14", + "Paragraph": "Boy and girl child and adolescent soldiers can range in age from 6 to 18. It is very likely that they have been exposed to a variety of physical and psychological traumas, including mental and sexual abuse, and that they have had very limited access to clinical and public health services. Child and adolescent soldiers, who are often brutally recruited from very poor communities, or orphaned, are already in a poor state of health before they face the additional hardship of life with an armed group or force. Their vulnerability remains high during the DDR process, and health services should therefore deal with their specific needs as a priority. Special attention should be given to problems that may cause the child fear, embarrassment or stigmatization, e.g.: \n child and adolescent care and support services should offer a special focus on trauma- related stress disorders, depression and anxiety; \n treatment should be provided for drug and alcohol addiction; \n there should be services for the prevention, early detection and clinical management of STIs and HIV\/AIDS; \n special assistance should be offered to girls and boys for the treatment and clinical management of the consequences of sexual abuse, and every effort should be made to prevent sexual abuse taking place, with due respect for confidentiality.14", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -185707,7 +185707,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2942, - "Paragraph": "Boy and girl child and adolescent soldiers can range in age from 6 to 18. It is very likely that they have been exposed to a variety of physical and psychological traumas, including mental and sexual abuse, and that they have had very limited access to clinical and public health services. Child and adolescent soldiers, who are often brutally recruited from very poor communities, or orphaned, are already in a poor state of health before they face the additional hardship of life with an armed group or force. Their vulnerability remains high during the DDR process, and health services should therefore deal with their specific needs as a priority. Special attention should be given to problems that may cause the child fear, embarrassment or stigmatization, e.g.: \\n child and adolescent care and support services should offer a special focus on trauma- related stress disorders, depression and anxiety; \\n treatment should be provided for drug and alcohol addiction; \\n there should be services for the prevention, early detection and clinical management of STIs and HIV\/AIDS; \\n special assistance should be offered to girls and boys for the treatment and clinical management of the consequences of sexual abuse, and every effort should be made to prevent sexual abuse taking place, with due respect for confidentiality.14", + "Paragraph": "Boy and girl child and adolescent soldiers can range in age from 6 to 18. It is very likely that they have been exposed to a variety of physical and psychological traumas, including mental and sexual abuse, and that they have had very limited access to clinical and public health services. Child and adolescent soldiers, who are often brutally recruited from very poor communities, or orphaned, are already in a poor state of health before they face the additional hardship of life with an armed group or force. Their vulnerability remains high during the DDR process, and health services should therefore deal with their specific needs as a priority. Special attention should be given to problems that may cause the child fear, embarrassment or stigmatization, e.g.: \n child and adolescent care and support services should offer a special focus on trauma- related stress disorders, depression and anxiety; \n treatment should be provided for drug and alcohol addiction; \n there should be services for the prevention, early detection and clinical management of STIs and HIV\/AIDS; \n special assistance should be offered to girls and boys for the treatment and clinical management of the consequences of sexual abuse, and every effort should be made to prevent sexual abuse taking place, with due respect for confidentiality.14", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -185725,7 +185725,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2942, - "Paragraph": "Boy and girl child and adolescent soldiers can range in age from 6 to 18. It is very likely that they have been exposed to a variety of physical and psychological traumas, including mental and sexual abuse, and that they have had very limited access to clinical and public health services. Child and adolescent soldiers, who are often brutally recruited from very poor communities, or orphaned, are already in a poor state of health before they face the additional hardship of life with an armed group or force. Their vulnerability remains high during the DDR process, and health services should therefore deal with their specific needs as a priority. Special attention should be given to problems that may cause the child fear, embarrassment or stigmatization, e.g.: \\n child and adolescent care and support services should offer a special focus on trauma- related stress disorders, depression and anxiety; \\n treatment should be provided for drug and alcohol addiction; \\n there should be services for the prevention, early detection and clinical management of STIs and HIV\/AIDS; \\n special assistance should be offered to girls and boys for the treatment and clinical management of the consequences of sexual abuse, and every effort should be made to prevent sexual abuse taking place, with due respect for confidentiality.14", + "Paragraph": "Boy and girl child and adolescent soldiers can range in age from 6 to 18. It is very likely that they have been exposed to a variety of physical and psychological traumas, including mental and sexual abuse, and that they have had very limited access to clinical and public health services. Child and adolescent soldiers, who are often brutally recruited from very poor communities, or orphaned, are already in a poor state of health before they face the additional hardship of life with an armed group or force. Their vulnerability remains high during the DDR process, and health services should therefore deal with their specific needs as a priority. Special attention should be given to problems that may cause the child fear, embarrassment or stigmatization, e.g.: \n child and adolescent care and support services should offer a special focus on trauma- related stress disorders, depression and anxiety; \n treatment should be provided for drug and alcohol addiction; \n there should be services for the prevention, early detection and clinical management of STIs and HIV\/AIDS; \n special assistance should be offered to girls and boys for the treatment and clinical management of the consequences of sexual abuse, and every effort should be made to prevent sexual abuse taking place, with due respect for confidentiality.14", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -185736,7 +185736,7 @@ "Heading2": "8.4. Responding to the needs of vulnerable groups", "Heading3": "8.4.1. Children and adolescents associated with armed groups and forces", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": ": \\n child and adolescent care and support services should offer a special focus on trauma- related stress disorders, depression and anxiety; \\n treatment should be provided for drug and alcohol addiction; \\n there should be services for the prevention, early detection and clinical management of STIs and HIV\/AIDS; \\n special assistance should be offered to girls and boys for the treatment and clinical management of the consequences of sexual abuse, and every effort should be made to prevent sexual abuse taking place, with due respect for confidentiality.14", + "Sentence": ": \n child and adolescent care and support services should offer a special focus on trauma- related stress disorders, depression and anxiety; \n treatment should be provided for drug and alcohol addiction; \n there should be services for the prevention, early detection and clinical management of STIs and HIV\/AIDS; \n special assistance should be offered to girls and boys for the treatment and clinical management of the consequences of sexual abuse, and every effort should be made to prevent sexual abuse taking place, with due respect for confidentiality.14", "newParagraph": "boy girl child adolescent soldier range age 6 18 likely exposed variety physical psychological trauma including mental sexual abuse limited access clinical public health service child adolescent soldier often brutally recruited poor community orphaned already poor state health face additional hardship life armed group force vulnerability remains high ddr process health service therefore deal specific need priority special attention given problem may cause child fear embarrassment stigmatization eg n child adolescent care support service offer special focus trauma related stress disorder depression anxiety n treatment provided drug alcohol addiction n service prevention early detection clinical management stis hivaids n special assistance offered girl boy treatment clinical management consequence sexual abuse every effort made prevent sexual abuse taking place due respect confidentiality14", "ProcessedSent": " n child adolescent care support service offer special focus trauma related stress disorder depression anxiety n treatment provided drug alcohol addiction n service prevention early detection clinical management stis hivaids n special assistance offered girl boy treatment clinical management consequence sexual abuse every effort made prevent sexual abuse taking place due respect confidentiality14", "SentID": 10318 @@ -186085,7 +186085,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2950, - "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \\n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \\n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \\n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \\n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \\n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \\n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \\n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \\n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \\n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \\n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \\n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", + "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -186103,7 +186103,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2950, - "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \\n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \\n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \\n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \\n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \\n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \\n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \\n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \\n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \\n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \\n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \\n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", + "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -186114,14 +186114,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process?", + "Sentence": "\n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process?", "newParagraph": "1 whoemergency humanitarian action preliminary idea contribution disarma ment demobilization repatriation reintegration resettlement democratic republic congo unpublished technical paper office wr 2002 n 2 zagaria n g arcadu role health peace process case study angola rome october 1997 n 3 eide e b kaspersen r kent k von hippel report integrated mission practical perspec tive recommendation independent study expanded un echa executive committee humanitarian affair core group may 2005 pp 3 28 n 4 one example angola un verification angola mission iii humanitarian entitlement unita troop much higher one provided dependant n 5 technical guidance refer communicable disease control emergency field manual httpwwwwhointinfectiousdiseasenewsiddocswhocds200527whocds200527chapters indexhtm n 6 short health profile many country crisis guideline rapid health assessment see httpwwwwhointhac n 7 sphere project provides wide range standard provide useful point reference assessment capacity local health system poor country see sphere project humani tarian charter minimum standard disaster response 2004 httpwwwsphereprojectorg n 8 see woman commission refugee woman child field friendly guide integrate emergency obstetric care humanitarian program httpwwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 9 case definition must developed health eventdiseasesyndrome standard case definition available may adapted according local situation po sible case definition host country ministry health used available important reporting monitoringsurveillance system regardless affiliation use case definition consistency reporting n 10 see reproductive health response conflict consortium emergency contraception conflict affected setting reproductive health response conflict consortium distance learning module 2004 http wwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 11 see sphere project op cit pp 291 293 n 12 whoemergency humanitarian action op cit n 13 emergency reproductive health rh kit originally developed 1996 member interagency working group reproductive health refugee situation deliver rh service emergency refugee situation obtain kit ddr practitionershealth expert contact whounfpa field office country relevant implementing partner n 14 httpwwwwhointchildadolescenthealth see also whoun high commissioner refugee clinical management rape survivor developing protocol use refugee internally displaced person revised edition 2004 httpwwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 15 see resource reproductive health conflict consortium httpwwwrhrcorgresources general5ffieldtools especially inter agency field manual", "ProcessedSent": "n 2 zagaria n g arcadu role health peace process", "SentID": 10339 }, { "ParagraphID": 2950, - "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \\n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \\n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \\n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \\n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \\n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \\n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \\n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \\n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \\n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \\n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \\n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", + "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -186139,7 +186139,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2950, - "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \\n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \\n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \\n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \\n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \\n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \\n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \\n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \\n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \\n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \\n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \\n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", + "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -186150,14 +186150,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp.", + "Sentence": "\n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp.", "newParagraph": "1 whoemergency humanitarian action preliminary idea contribution disarma ment demobilization repatriation reintegration resettlement democratic republic congo unpublished technical paper office wr 2002 n 2 zagaria n g arcadu role health peace process case study angola rome october 1997 n 3 eide e b kaspersen r kent k von hippel report integrated mission practical perspec tive recommendation independent study expanded un echa executive committee humanitarian affair core group may 2005 pp 3 28 n 4 one example angola un verification angola mission iii humanitarian entitlement unita troop much higher one provided dependant n 5 technical guidance refer communicable disease control emergency field manual httpwwwwhointinfectiousdiseasenewsiddocswhocds200527whocds200527chapters indexhtm n 6 short health profile many country crisis guideline rapid health assessment see httpwwwwhointhac n 7 sphere project provides wide range standard provide useful point reference assessment capacity local health system poor country see sphere project humani tarian charter minimum standard disaster response 2004 httpwwwsphereprojectorg n 8 see woman commission refugee woman child field friendly guide integrate emergency obstetric care humanitarian program httpwwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 9 case definition must developed health eventdiseasesyndrome standard case definition available may adapted according local situation po sible case definition host country ministry health used available important reporting monitoringsurveillance system regardless affiliation use case definition consistency reporting n 10 see reproductive health response conflict consortium emergency contraception conflict affected setting reproductive health response conflict consortium distance learning module 2004 http wwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 11 see sphere project op cit pp 291 293 n 12 whoemergency humanitarian action op cit n 13 emergency reproductive health rh kit originally developed 1996 member interagency working group reproductive health refugee situation deliver rh service emergency refugee situation obtain kit ddr practitionershealth expert contact whounfpa field office country relevant implementing partner n 14 httpwwwwhointchildadolescenthealth see also whoun high commissioner refugee clinical management rape survivor developing protocol use refugee internally displaced person revised edition 2004 httpwwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 15 see resource reproductive health conflict consortium httpwwwrhrcorgresources general5ffieldtools especially inter agency field manual", "ProcessedSent": "n 3 eide e b kaspersen r kent k von hippel report integrated mission practical perspec tive recommendation independent study expanded un echa executive committee humanitarian affair core group may 2005 pp", "SentID": 10341 }, { "ParagraphID": 2950, - "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \\n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \\n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \\n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \\n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \\n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \\n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \\n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \\n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \\n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \\n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \\n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", + "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -186175,7 +186175,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2950, - "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \\n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \\n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \\n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \\n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \\n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \\n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \\n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \\n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \\n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \\n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \\n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", + "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -186186,14 +186186,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants.", + "Sentence": "\n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants.", "newParagraph": "1 whoemergency humanitarian action preliminary idea contribution disarma ment demobilization repatriation reintegration resettlement democratic republic congo unpublished technical paper office wr 2002 n 2 zagaria n g arcadu role health peace process case study angola rome october 1997 n 3 eide e b kaspersen r kent k von hippel report integrated mission practical perspec tive recommendation independent study expanded un echa executive committee humanitarian affair core group may 2005 pp 3 28 n 4 one example angola un verification angola mission iii humanitarian entitlement unita troop much higher one provided dependant n 5 technical guidance refer communicable disease control emergency field manual httpwwwwhointinfectiousdiseasenewsiddocswhocds200527whocds200527chapters indexhtm n 6 short health profile many country crisis guideline rapid health assessment see httpwwwwhointhac n 7 sphere project provides wide range standard provide useful point reference assessment capacity local health system poor country see sphere project humani tarian charter minimum standard disaster response 2004 httpwwwsphereprojectorg n 8 see woman commission refugee woman child field friendly guide integrate emergency obstetric care humanitarian program httpwwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 9 case definition must developed health eventdiseasesyndrome standard case definition available may adapted according local situation po sible case definition host country ministry health used available important reporting monitoringsurveillance system regardless affiliation use case definition consistency reporting n 10 see reproductive health response conflict consortium emergency contraception conflict affected setting reproductive health response conflict consortium distance learning module 2004 http wwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 11 see sphere project op cit pp 291 293 n 12 whoemergency humanitarian action op cit n 13 emergency reproductive health rh kit originally developed 1996 member interagency working group reproductive health refugee situation deliver rh service emergency refugee situation obtain kit ddr practitionershealth expert contact whounfpa field office country relevant implementing partner n 14 httpwwwwhointchildadolescenthealth see also whoun high commissioner refugee clinical management rape survivor developing protocol use refugee internally displaced person revised edition 2004 httpwwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 15 see resource reproductive health conflict consortium httpwwwrhrcorgresources general5ffieldtools especially inter agency field manual", "ProcessedSent": "n 4 one example angola un verification angola mission iii humanitarian entitlement unita troop much higher one provided dependant", "SentID": 10343 }, { "ParagraphID": 2950, - "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \\n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \\n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \\n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \\n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \\n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \\n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \\n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \\n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \\n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \\n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \\n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", + "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -186204,14 +186204,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm.", + "Sentence": "\n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm.", "newParagraph": "1 whoemergency humanitarian action preliminary idea contribution disarma ment demobilization repatriation reintegration resettlement democratic republic congo unpublished technical paper office wr 2002 n 2 zagaria n g arcadu role health peace process case study angola rome october 1997 n 3 eide e b kaspersen r kent k von hippel report integrated mission practical perspec tive recommendation independent study expanded un echa executive committee humanitarian affair core group may 2005 pp 3 28 n 4 one example angola un verification angola mission iii humanitarian entitlement unita troop much higher one provided dependant n 5 technical guidance refer communicable disease control emergency field manual httpwwwwhointinfectiousdiseasenewsiddocswhocds200527whocds200527chapters indexhtm n 6 short health profile many country crisis guideline rapid health assessment see httpwwwwhointhac n 7 sphere project provides wide range standard provide useful point reference assessment capacity local health system poor country see sphere project humani tarian charter minimum standard disaster response 2004 httpwwwsphereprojectorg n 8 see woman commission refugee woman child field friendly guide integrate emergency obstetric care humanitarian program httpwwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 9 case definition must developed health eventdiseasesyndrome standard case definition available may adapted according local situation po sible case definition host country ministry health used available important reporting monitoringsurveillance system regardless affiliation use case definition consistency reporting n 10 see reproductive health response conflict consortium emergency contraception conflict affected setting reproductive health response conflict consortium distance learning module 2004 http wwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 11 see sphere project op cit pp 291 293 n 12 whoemergency humanitarian action op cit n 13 emergency reproductive health rh kit originally developed 1996 member interagency working group reproductive health refugee situation deliver rh service emergency refugee situation obtain kit ddr practitionershealth expert contact whounfpa field office country relevant implementing partner n 14 httpwwwwhointchildadolescenthealth see also whoun high commissioner refugee clinical management rape survivor developing protocol use refugee internally displaced person revised edition 2004 httpwwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 15 see resource reproductive health conflict consortium httpwwwrhrcorgresources general5ffieldtools especially inter agency field manual", "ProcessedSent": "n 5 technical guidance refer communicable disease control emergency field manual httpwwwwhointinfectiousdiseasenewsiddocswhocds200527whocds200527chapters indexhtm", "SentID": 10344 }, { "ParagraphID": 2950, - "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \\n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \\n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \\n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \\n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \\n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \\n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \\n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \\n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \\n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \\n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \\n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", + "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -186222,14 +186222,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac.", + "Sentence": "\n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac.", "newParagraph": "1 whoemergency humanitarian action preliminary idea contribution disarma ment demobilization repatriation reintegration resettlement democratic republic congo unpublished technical paper office wr 2002 n 2 zagaria n g arcadu role health peace process case study angola rome october 1997 n 3 eide e b kaspersen r kent k von hippel report integrated mission practical perspec tive recommendation independent study expanded un echa executive committee humanitarian affair core group may 2005 pp 3 28 n 4 one example angola un verification angola mission iii humanitarian entitlement unita troop much higher one provided dependant n 5 technical guidance refer communicable disease control emergency field manual httpwwwwhointinfectiousdiseasenewsiddocswhocds200527whocds200527chapters indexhtm n 6 short health profile many country crisis guideline rapid health assessment see httpwwwwhointhac n 7 sphere project provides wide range standard provide useful point reference assessment capacity local health system poor country see sphere project humani tarian charter minimum standard disaster response 2004 httpwwwsphereprojectorg n 8 see woman commission refugee woman child field friendly guide integrate emergency obstetric care humanitarian program httpwwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 9 case definition must developed health eventdiseasesyndrome standard case definition available may adapted according local situation po sible case definition host country ministry health used available important reporting monitoringsurveillance system regardless affiliation use case definition consistency reporting n 10 see reproductive health response conflict consortium emergency contraception conflict affected setting reproductive health response conflict consortium distance learning module 2004 http wwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 11 see sphere project op cit pp 291 293 n 12 whoemergency humanitarian action op cit n 13 emergency reproductive health rh kit originally developed 1996 member interagency working group reproductive health refugee situation deliver rh service emergency refugee situation obtain kit ddr practitionershealth expert contact whounfpa field office country relevant implementing partner n 14 httpwwwwhointchildadolescenthealth see also whoun high commissioner refugee clinical management rape survivor developing protocol use refugee internally displaced person revised edition 2004 httpwwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 15 see resource reproductive health conflict consortium httpwwwrhrcorgresources general5ffieldtools especially inter agency field manual", "ProcessedSent": "n 6 short health profile many country crisis guideline rapid health assessment see httpwwwwhointhac", "SentID": 10345 }, { "ParagraphID": 2950, - "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \\n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \\n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \\n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \\n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \\n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \\n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \\n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \\n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \\n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \\n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \\n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", + "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -186240,14 +186240,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org).", + "Sentence": "\n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org).", "newParagraph": "1 whoemergency humanitarian action preliminary idea contribution disarma ment demobilization repatriation reintegration resettlement democratic republic congo unpublished technical paper office wr 2002 n 2 zagaria n g arcadu role health peace process case study angola rome october 1997 n 3 eide e b kaspersen r kent k von hippel report integrated mission practical perspec tive recommendation independent study expanded un echa executive committee humanitarian affair core group may 2005 pp 3 28 n 4 one example angola un verification angola mission iii humanitarian entitlement unita troop much higher one provided dependant n 5 technical guidance refer communicable disease control emergency field manual httpwwwwhointinfectiousdiseasenewsiddocswhocds200527whocds200527chapters indexhtm n 6 short health profile many country crisis guideline rapid health assessment see httpwwwwhointhac n 7 sphere project provides wide range standard provide useful point reference assessment capacity local health system poor country see sphere project humani tarian charter minimum standard disaster response 2004 httpwwwsphereprojectorg n 8 see woman commission refugee woman child field friendly guide integrate emergency obstetric care humanitarian program httpwwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 9 case definition must developed health eventdiseasesyndrome standard case definition available may adapted according local situation po sible case definition host country ministry health used available important reporting monitoringsurveillance system regardless affiliation use case definition consistency reporting n 10 see reproductive health response conflict consortium emergency contraception conflict affected setting reproductive health response conflict consortium distance learning module 2004 http wwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 11 see sphere project op cit pp 291 293 n 12 whoemergency humanitarian action op cit n 13 emergency reproductive health rh kit originally developed 1996 member interagency working group reproductive health refugee situation deliver rh service emergency refugee situation obtain kit ddr practitionershealth expert contact whounfpa field office country relevant implementing partner n 14 httpwwwwhointchildadolescenthealth see also whoun high commissioner refugee clinical management rape survivor developing protocol use refugee internally displaced person revised edition 2004 httpwwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 15 see resource reproductive health conflict consortium httpwwwrhrcorgresources general5ffieldtools especially inter agency field manual", "ProcessedSent": "n 7 sphere project provides wide range standard provide useful point reference assessment capacity local health system poor country see sphere project humani tarian charter minimum standard disaster response 2004 httpwwwsphereprojectorg", "SentID": 10346 }, { "ParagraphID": 2950, - "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \\n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \\n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \\n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \\n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \\n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \\n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \\n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \\n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \\n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \\n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \\n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", + "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -186258,14 +186258,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/.", + "Sentence": "\n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/.", "newParagraph": "1 whoemergency humanitarian action preliminary idea contribution disarma ment demobilization repatriation reintegration resettlement democratic republic congo unpublished technical paper office wr 2002 n 2 zagaria n g arcadu role health peace process case study angola rome october 1997 n 3 eide e b kaspersen r kent k von hippel report integrated mission practical perspec tive recommendation independent study expanded un echa executive committee humanitarian affair core group may 2005 pp 3 28 n 4 one example angola un verification angola mission iii humanitarian entitlement unita troop much higher one provided dependant n 5 technical guidance refer communicable disease control emergency field manual httpwwwwhointinfectiousdiseasenewsiddocswhocds200527whocds200527chapters indexhtm n 6 short health profile many country crisis guideline rapid health assessment see httpwwwwhointhac n 7 sphere project provides wide range standard provide useful point reference assessment capacity local health system poor country see sphere project humani tarian charter minimum standard disaster response 2004 httpwwwsphereprojectorg n 8 see woman commission refugee woman child field friendly guide integrate emergency obstetric care humanitarian program httpwwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 9 case definition must developed health eventdiseasesyndrome standard case definition available may adapted according local situation po sible case definition host country ministry health used available important reporting monitoringsurveillance system regardless affiliation use case definition consistency reporting n 10 see reproductive health response conflict consortium emergency contraception conflict affected setting reproductive health response conflict consortium distance learning module 2004 http wwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 11 see sphere project op cit pp 291 293 n 12 whoemergency humanitarian action op cit n 13 emergency reproductive health rh kit originally developed 1996 member interagency working group reproductive health refugee situation deliver rh service emergency refugee situation obtain kit ddr practitionershealth expert contact whounfpa field office country relevant implementing partner n 14 httpwwwwhointchildadolescenthealth see also whoun high commissioner refugee clinical management rape survivor developing protocol use refugee internally displaced person revised edition 2004 httpwwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 15 see resource reproductive health conflict consortium httpwwwrhrcorgresources general5ffieldtools especially inter agency field manual", "ProcessedSent": "n 8 see woman commission refugee woman child field friendly guide integrate emergency obstetric care humanitarian program httpwwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools", "SentID": 10347 }, { "ParagraphID": 2950, - "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \\n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \\n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \\n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \\n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \\n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \\n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \\n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \\n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \\n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \\n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \\n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", + "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -186276,14 +186276,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome.", + "Sentence": "\n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome.", "newParagraph": "1 whoemergency humanitarian action preliminary idea contribution disarma ment demobilization repatriation reintegration resettlement democratic republic congo unpublished technical paper office wr 2002 n 2 zagaria n g arcadu role health peace process case study angola rome october 1997 n 3 eide e b kaspersen r kent k von hippel report integrated mission practical perspec tive recommendation independent study expanded un echa executive committee humanitarian affair core group may 2005 pp 3 28 n 4 one example angola un verification angola mission iii humanitarian entitlement unita troop much higher one provided dependant n 5 technical guidance refer communicable disease control emergency field manual httpwwwwhointinfectiousdiseasenewsiddocswhocds200527whocds200527chapters indexhtm n 6 short health profile many country crisis guideline rapid health assessment see httpwwwwhointhac n 7 sphere project provides wide range standard provide useful point reference assessment capacity local health system poor country see sphere project humani tarian charter minimum standard disaster response 2004 httpwwwsphereprojectorg n 8 see woman commission refugee woman child field friendly guide integrate emergency obstetric care humanitarian program httpwwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 9 case definition must developed health eventdiseasesyndrome standard case definition available may adapted according local situation po sible case definition host country ministry health used available important reporting monitoringsurveillance system regardless affiliation use case definition consistency reporting n 10 see reproductive health response conflict consortium emergency contraception conflict affected setting reproductive health response conflict consortium distance learning module 2004 http wwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 11 see sphere project op cit pp 291 293 n 12 whoemergency humanitarian action op cit n 13 emergency reproductive health rh kit originally developed 1996 member interagency working group reproductive health refugee situation deliver rh service emergency refugee situation obtain kit ddr practitionershealth expert contact whounfpa field office country relevant implementing partner n 14 httpwwwwhointchildadolescenthealth see also whoun high commissioner refugee clinical management rape survivor developing protocol use refugee internally displaced person revised edition 2004 httpwwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 15 see resource reproductive health conflict consortium httpwwwrhrcorgresources general5ffieldtools especially inter agency field manual", "ProcessedSent": "n 9 case definition must developed health eventdiseasesyndrome", "SentID": 10348 }, { "ParagraphID": 2950, - "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \\n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \\n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \\n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \\n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \\n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \\n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \\n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \\n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \\n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \\n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \\n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", + "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -186301,7 +186301,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2950, - "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \\n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \\n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \\n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \\n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \\n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \\n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \\n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \\n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \\n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \\n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \\n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", + "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -186319,7 +186319,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2950, - "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \\n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \\n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \\n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \\n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \\n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \\n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \\n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \\n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \\n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \\n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \\n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", + "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -186337,7 +186337,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2950, - "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \\n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \\n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \\n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \\n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \\n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \\n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \\n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \\n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \\n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \\n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \\n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", + "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -186348,14 +186348,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/.", + "Sentence": "\n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/.", "newParagraph": "1 whoemergency humanitarian action preliminary idea contribution disarma ment demobilization repatriation reintegration resettlement democratic republic congo unpublished technical paper office wr 2002 n 2 zagaria n g arcadu role health peace process case study angola rome october 1997 n 3 eide e b kaspersen r kent k von hippel report integrated mission practical perspec tive recommendation independent study expanded un echa executive committee humanitarian affair core group may 2005 pp 3 28 n 4 one example angola un verification angola mission iii humanitarian entitlement unita troop much higher one provided dependant n 5 technical guidance refer communicable disease control emergency field manual httpwwwwhointinfectiousdiseasenewsiddocswhocds200527whocds200527chapters indexhtm n 6 short health profile many country crisis guideline rapid health assessment see httpwwwwhointhac n 7 sphere project provides wide range standard provide useful point reference assessment capacity local health system poor country see sphere project humani tarian charter minimum standard disaster response 2004 httpwwwsphereprojectorg n 8 see woman commission refugee woman child field friendly guide integrate emergency obstetric care humanitarian program httpwwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 9 case definition must developed health eventdiseasesyndrome standard case definition available may adapted according local situation po sible case definition host country ministry health used available important reporting monitoringsurveillance system regardless affiliation use case definition consistency reporting n 10 see reproductive health response conflict consortium emergency contraception conflict affected setting reproductive health response conflict consortium distance learning module 2004 http wwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 11 see sphere project op cit pp 291 293 n 12 whoemergency humanitarian action op cit n 13 emergency reproductive health rh kit originally developed 1996 member interagency working group reproductive health refugee situation deliver rh service emergency refugee situation obtain kit ddr practitionershealth expert contact whounfpa field office country relevant implementing partner n 14 httpwwwwhointchildadolescenthealth see also whoun high commissioner refugee clinical management rape survivor developing protocol use refugee internally displaced person revised edition 2004 httpwwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 15 see resource reproductive health conflict consortium httpwwwrhrcorgresources general5ffieldtools especially inter agency field manual", "ProcessedSent": "n 10 see reproductive health response conflict consortium emergency contraception conflict affected setting reproductive health response conflict consortium distance learning module 2004 http wwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools", "SentID": 10352 }, { "ParagraphID": 2950, - "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \\n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \\n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \\n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \\n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \\n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \\n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \\n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \\n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \\n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \\n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \\n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", + "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -186366,14 +186366,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 11 See the Sphere Project, op.", + "Sentence": "\n 11 See the Sphere Project, op.", "newParagraph": "1 whoemergency humanitarian action preliminary idea contribution disarma ment demobilization repatriation reintegration resettlement democratic republic congo unpublished technical paper office wr 2002 n 2 zagaria n g arcadu role health peace process case study angola rome october 1997 n 3 eide e b kaspersen r kent k von hippel report integrated mission practical perspec tive recommendation independent study expanded un echa executive committee humanitarian affair core group may 2005 pp 3 28 n 4 one example angola un verification angola mission iii humanitarian entitlement unita troop much higher one provided dependant n 5 technical guidance refer communicable disease control emergency field manual httpwwwwhointinfectiousdiseasenewsiddocswhocds200527whocds200527chapters indexhtm n 6 short health profile many country crisis guideline rapid health assessment see httpwwwwhointhac n 7 sphere project provides wide range standard provide useful point reference assessment capacity local health system poor country see sphere project humani tarian charter minimum standard disaster response 2004 httpwwwsphereprojectorg n 8 see woman commission refugee woman child field friendly guide integrate emergency obstetric care humanitarian program httpwwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 9 case definition must developed health eventdiseasesyndrome standard case definition available may adapted according local situation po sible case definition host country ministry health used available important reporting monitoringsurveillance system regardless affiliation use case definition consistency reporting n 10 see reproductive health response conflict consortium emergency contraception conflict affected setting reproductive health response conflict consortium distance learning module 2004 http wwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 11 see sphere project op cit pp 291 293 n 12 whoemergency humanitarian action op cit n 13 emergency reproductive health rh kit originally developed 1996 member interagency working group reproductive health refugee situation deliver rh service emergency refugee situation obtain kit ddr practitionershealth expert contact whounfpa field office country relevant implementing partner n 14 httpwwwwhointchildadolescenthealth see also whoun high commissioner refugee clinical management rape survivor developing protocol use refugee internally displaced person revised edition 2004 httpwwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 15 see resource reproductive health conflict consortium httpwwwrhrcorgresources general5ffieldtools especially inter agency field manual", "ProcessedSent": "n 11 see sphere project op", "SentID": 10353 }, { "ParagraphID": 2950, - "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \\n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \\n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \\n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \\n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \\n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \\n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \\n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \\n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \\n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \\n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \\n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", + "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -186391,7 +186391,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2950, - "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \\n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \\n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \\n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \\n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \\n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \\n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \\n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \\n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \\n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \\n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \\n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", + "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -186409,7 +186409,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2950, - "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \\n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \\n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \\n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \\n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \\n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \\n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \\n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \\n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \\n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \\n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \\n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", + "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -186420,14 +186420,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op.", + "Sentence": "\n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op.", "newParagraph": "1 whoemergency humanitarian action preliminary idea contribution disarma ment demobilization repatriation reintegration resettlement democratic republic congo unpublished technical paper office wr 2002 n 2 zagaria n g arcadu role health peace process case study angola rome october 1997 n 3 eide e b kaspersen r kent k von hippel report integrated mission practical perspec tive recommendation independent study expanded un echa executive committee humanitarian affair core group may 2005 pp 3 28 n 4 one example angola un verification angola mission iii humanitarian entitlement unita troop much higher one provided dependant n 5 technical guidance refer communicable disease control emergency field manual httpwwwwhointinfectiousdiseasenewsiddocswhocds200527whocds200527chapters indexhtm n 6 short health profile many country crisis guideline rapid health assessment see httpwwwwhointhac n 7 sphere project provides wide range standard provide useful point reference assessment capacity local health system poor country see sphere project humani tarian charter minimum standard disaster response 2004 httpwwwsphereprojectorg n 8 see woman commission refugee woman child field friendly guide integrate emergency obstetric care humanitarian program httpwwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 9 case definition must developed health eventdiseasesyndrome standard case definition available may adapted according local situation po sible case definition host country ministry health used available important reporting monitoringsurveillance system regardless affiliation use case definition consistency reporting n 10 see reproductive health response conflict consortium emergency contraception conflict affected setting reproductive health response conflict consortium distance learning module 2004 http wwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 11 see sphere project op cit pp 291 293 n 12 whoemergency humanitarian action op cit n 13 emergency reproductive health rh kit originally developed 1996 member interagency working group reproductive health refugee situation deliver rh service emergency refugee situation obtain kit ddr practitionershealth expert contact whounfpa field office country relevant implementing partner n 14 httpwwwwhointchildadolescenthealth see also whoun high commissioner refugee clinical management rape survivor developing protocol use refugee internally displaced person revised edition 2004 httpwwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 15 see resource reproductive health conflict consortium httpwwwrhrcorgresources general5ffieldtools especially inter agency field manual", "ProcessedSent": "n 12 whoemergency humanitarian action op", "SentID": 10356 }, { "ParagraphID": 2950, - "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \\n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \\n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \\n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \\n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \\n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \\n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \\n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \\n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \\n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \\n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \\n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", + "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -186445,7 +186445,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2950, - "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \\n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \\n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \\n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \\n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \\n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \\n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \\n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \\n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \\n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \\n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \\n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", + "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -186456,14 +186456,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations.", + "Sentence": "\n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations.", "newParagraph": "1 whoemergency humanitarian action preliminary idea contribution disarma ment demobilization repatriation reintegration resettlement democratic republic congo unpublished technical paper office wr 2002 n 2 zagaria n g arcadu role health peace process case study angola rome october 1997 n 3 eide e b kaspersen r kent k von hippel report integrated mission practical perspec tive recommendation independent study expanded un echa executive committee humanitarian affair core group may 2005 pp 3 28 n 4 one example angola un verification angola mission iii humanitarian entitlement unita troop much higher one provided dependant n 5 technical guidance refer communicable disease control emergency field manual httpwwwwhointinfectiousdiseasenewsiddocswhocds200527whocds200527chapters indexhtm n 6 short health profile many country crisis guideline rapid health assessment see httpwwwwhointhac n 7 sphere project provides wide range standard provide useful point reference assessment capacity local health system poor country see sphere project humani tarian charter minimum standard disaster response 2004 httpwwwsphereprojectorg n 8 see woman commission refugee woman child field friendly guide integrate emergency obstetric care humanitarian program httpwwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 9 case definition must developed health eventdiseasesyndrome standard case definition available may adapted according local situation po sible case definition host country ministry health used available important reporting monitoringsurveillance system regardless affiliation use case definition consistency reporting n 10 see reproductive health response conflict consortium emergency contraception conflict affected setting reproductive health response conflict consortium distance learning module 2004 http wwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 11 see sphere project op cit pp 291 293 n 12 whoemergency humanitarian action op cit n 13 emergency reproductive health rh kit originally developed 1996 member interagency working group reproductive health refugee situation deliver rh service emergency refugee situation obtain kit ddr practitionershealth expert contact whounfpa field office country relevant implementing partner n 14 httpwwwwhointchildadolescenthealth see also whoun high commissioner refugee clinical management rape survivor developing protocol use refugee internally displaced person revised edition 2004 httpwwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 15 see resource reproductive health conflict consortium httpwwwrhrcorgresources general5ffieldtools especially inter agency field manual", "ProcessedSent": "n 13 emergency reproductive health rh kit originally developed 1996 member interagency working group reproductive health refugee situation deliver rh service emergency refugee situation", "SentID": 10358 }, { "ParagraphID": 2950, - "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \\n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \\n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \\n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \\n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \\n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \\n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \\n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \\n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \\n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \\n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \\n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", + "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -186481,7 +186481,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2950, - "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \\n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \\n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \\n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \\n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \\n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \\n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \\n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \\n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \\n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \\n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \\n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", + "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -186492,14 +186492,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/.", + "Sentence": "\n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/.", "newParagraph": "1 whoemergency humanitarian action preliminary idea contribution disarma ment demobilization repatriation reintegration resettlement democratic republic congo unpublished technical paper office wr 2002 n 2 zagaria n g arcadu role health peace process case study angola rome october 1997 n 3 eide e b kaspersen r kent k von hippel report integrated mission practical perspec tive recommendation independent study expanded un echa executive committee humanitarian affair core group may 2005 pp 3 28 n 4 one example angola un verification angola mission iii humanitarian entitlement unita troop much higher one provided dependant n 5 technical guidance refer communicable disease control emergency field manual httpwwwwhointinfectiousdiseasenewsiddocswhocds200527whocds200527chapters indexhtm n 6 short health profile many country crisis guideline rapid health assessment see httpwwwwhointhac n 7 sphere project provides wide range standard provide useful point reference assessment capacity local health system poor country see sphere project humani tarian charter minimum standard disaster response 2004 httpwwwsphereprojectorg n 8 see woman commission refugee woman child field friendly guide integrate emergency obstetric care humanitarian program httpwwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 9 case definition must developed health eventdiseasesyndrome standard case definition available may adapted according local situation po sible case definition host country ministry health used available important reporting monitoringsurveillance system regardless affiliation use case definition consistency reporting n 10 see reproductive health response conflict consortium emergency contraception conflict affected setting reproductive health response conflict consortium distance learning module 2004 http wwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 11 see sphere project op cit pp 291 293 n 12 whoemergency humanitarian action op cit n 13 emergency reproductive health rh kit originally developed 1996 member interagency working group reproductive health refugee situation deliver rh service emergency refugee situation obtain kit ddr practitionershealth expert contact whounfpa field office country relevant implementing partner n 14 httpwwwwhointchildadolescenthealth see also whoun high commissioner refugee clinical management rape survivor developing protocol use refugee internally displaced person revised edition 2004 httpwwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 15 see resource reproductive health conflict consortium httpwwwrhrcorgresources general5ffieldtools especially inter agency field manual", "ProcessedSent": "n 14 httpwwwwhointchildadolescenthealth see also whoun high commissioner refugee clinical management rape survivor developing protocol use refugee internally displaced person revised edition 2004 httpwwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools", "SentID": 10360 }, { "ParagraphID": 2950, - "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \\n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \\n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \\n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \\n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \\n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \\n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \\n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \\n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \\n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \\n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \\n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \\n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", + "Paragraph": "1 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, \u2018Preliminary Ideas for WHO Contribution to Disarma- ment, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reintegration and Resettlement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo\u2019, unpublished technical paper, WHO Office in WR, 2002. \n 2 Zagaria, N. and G. Arcadu, What Role for Health in a Peace Process? The Case Study of Angola, Rome, October 1997. \n 3 Eide, E. B., A. T. Kaspersen, R. Kent and K. von Hippel, Report on Integrated Missions: Practical Perspec\u00ad tive and Recommendation, Independent Study for the Expanded UN ECHA (Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs) Core Group, May 2005, pp. 3 and 28. \n 4 In one example, in Angola during UN Verification Angola Mission III, the humanitarian entitlements for UNITA troops were much higher than the ones provided for their dependants. \n 5 For technical guidance, refer to WHO, Communicable Disease Control in Emergencies: A Field Manual, http:\/\/www.who.int\/infectious-disease-news\/IDdocs\/whocds200527\/whocds200527chapters\/ index.htm. \n 6 For short health profiles of many countries in crisis, and for guidelines on rapid health assessments, see WHO, http:\/\/www.who.int\/hac. \n 7 The Sphere Project provides a wide range of standards that can provide useful points of reference for an assessment of the capacity of a local health system in a poor country (see Sphere Project, Humani\u00ad tarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004, or http:\/\/www.sphereproject.org). \n 8 See Women\u2019s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Field\u00adfriendly Guide to Integrate Emergency Obstetric Care in Humanitarian Programs, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 9 Case definitions must be developed for each health event\/disease\/syndrome. Standard WHO case definitions are available, but these may have to be adapted according to the local situation. If pos- sible, the case definitions of the host country\u2019s ministry of health should be used, if they are available. What is important is that all of those reporting to the monitoring\/surveillance system, regardless of affiliation, use the same case definitions so that there is consistency in reporting. \n 10 See Reproductive Health Responses in Conflict Consortium, Emergency Contraception for Conflict Affected Settings: A Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium Distance Learning Module, 2004, http:\/\/ www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 11 See the Sphere Project, op. cit., pp. 291\u2013293. \n 12 WHO\/Emergency and Humanitarian Action, op. cit. \n 13 Emergency reproductive health (RH) kits were originally developed in 1996 by the members of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations to deliver RH services in emergency and refugee situations. To obtain these kits, the DDR practitioners\/health experts should contact the WHO\/UNFPA field office in that country or relevant implementing partners. \n 14 http:\/\/www.who.int\/child-adolescent-health; see also WHO\/UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, revised edition, 2004, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/general%5Ffieldtools\/. \n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", "Color": "#D10007", "Level": 5, "LevelName": "Cross-cutting Issues", @@ -186510,7 +186510,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", + "Sentence": "\n 15 See resources at the Reproductive Health in Conflict Consortium, http:\/\/www.rhrc.org\/resources\/ general%5Ffieldtools\/, especially the Inter\u00adagency Field Manual.", "newParagraph": "1 whoemergency humanitarian action preliminary idea contribution disarma ment demobilization repatriation reintegration resettlement democratic republic congo unpublished technical paper office wr 2002 n 2 zagaria n g arcadu role health peace process case study angola rome october 1997 n 3 eide e b kaspersen r kent k von hippel report integrated mission practical perspec tive recommendation independent study expanded un echa executive committee humanitarian affair core group may 2005 pp 3 28 n 4 one example angola un verification angola mission iii humanitarian entitlement unita troop much higher one provided dependant n 5 technical guidance refer communicable disease control emergency field manual httpwwwwhointinfectiousdiseasenewsiddocswhocds200527whocds200527chapters indexhtm n 6 short health profile many country crisis guideline rapid health assessment see httpwwwwhointhac n 7 sphere project provides wide range standard provide useful point reference assessment capacity local health system poor country see sphere project humani tarian charter minimum standard disaster response 2004 httpwwwsphereprojectorg n 8 see woman commission refugee woman child field friendly guide integrate emergency obstetric care humanitarian program httpwwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 9 case definition must developed health eventdiseasesyndrome standard case definition available may adapted according local situation po sible case definition host country ministry health used available important reporting monitoringsurveillance system regardless affiliation use case definition consistency reporting n 10 see reproductive health response conflict consortium emergency contraception conflict affected setting reproductive health response conflict consortium distance learning module 2004 http wwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 11 see sphere project op cit pp 291 293 n 12 whoemergency humanitarian action op cit n 13 emergency reproductive health rh kit originally developed 1996 member interagency working group reproductive health refugee situation deliver rh service emergency refugee situation obtain kit ddr practitionershealth expert contact whounfpa field office country relevant implementing partner n 14 httpwwwwhointchildadolescenthealth see also whoun high commissioner refugee clinical management rape survivor developing protocol use refugee internally displaced person revised edition 2004 httpwwwrhrcorgresourcesgeneral5ffieldtools n 15 see resource reproductive health conflict consortium httpwwwrhrcorgresources general5ffieldtools especially inter agency field manual", "ProcessedSent": "n 15 see resource reproductive health conflict consortium httpwwwrhrcorgresources general5ffieldtools especially inter agency field manual", "SentID": 10361 @@ -186519,7 +186519,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2951, "Paragraph": "The purpose of this module is to provide policy makers, operational planners and officers at field level with background information and guidance on related but distinct sets of activi- ties associated with disarmament, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) and security sector reform (SSR).1 The intention is not to set out a blueprint but to build from common principles in order to provide insights that will support the development of synergies as well as preventing harmful contradictions in the design, implementation and sequencing of different elements of DDR and SSR programmes.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -186535,9 +186535,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2952, - "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -186553,9 +186553,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2952, - "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -186571,9 +186571,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2952, - "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -186589,9 +186589,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2952, - "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -186600,7 +186600,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "newParagraph": "annex contains list term definition abbreviation used standard com plete glossary term definition abbreviation used series integrated ddr standard iddrs given iddrs 120 iddrs series word shall may must used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "ProcessedSent": "use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "SentID": 10366 @@ -186609,7 +186609,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2953, "Paragraph": "The UN has recognised in several texts and key documents that inter-linkages exist between DDR and SSR.2 This does not imply a linear relationship between different activities that involve highly distinct challenges depending on the context. It is essential to take into account the specific objectives, timelines, stakeholders and interests that affect these issues. However, understanding the relationship between DDR and SSR can help identify synergies in policy and programming and provide ways of ensuring short to medium term activities associated with DDR are linked to broader efforts to support the development of an effec- tive, well-managed and accountable security sector. Ignoring how DDR and SSR affect each other may result in missed opportunities or unintended consequences that undermine broader security and development goals.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -186627,7 +186627,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2953, "Paragraph": "The UN has recognised in several texts and key documents that inter-linkages exist between DDR and SSR.2 This does not imply a linear relationship between different activities that involve highly distinct challenges depending on the context. It is essential to take into account the specific objectives, timelines, stakeholders and interests that affect these issues. However, understanding the relationship between DDR and SSR can help identify synergies in policy and programming and provide ways of ensuring short to medium term activities associated with DDR are linked to broader efforts to support the development of an effec- tive, well-managed and accountable security sector. Ignoring how DDR and SSR affect each other may result in missed opportunities or unintended consequences that undermine broader security and development goals.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -186645,7 +186645,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2953, "Paragraph": "The UN has recognised in several texts and key documents that inter-linkages exist between DDR and SSR.2 This does not imply a linear relationship between different activities that involve highly distinct challenges depending on the context. It is essential to take into account the specific objectives, timelines, stakeholders and interests that affect these issues. However, understanding the relationship between DDR and SSR can help identify synergies in policy and programming and provide ways of ensuring short to medium term activities associated with DDR are linked to broader efforts to support the development of an effec- tive, well-managed and accountable security sector. Ignoring how DDR and SSR affect each other may result in missed opportunities or unintended consequences that undermine broader security and development goals.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -186663,7 +186663,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2953, "Paragraph": "The UN has recognised in several texts and key documents that inter-linkages exist between DDR and SSR.2 This does not imply a linear relationship between different activities that involve highly distinct challenges depending on the context. It is essential to take into account the specific objectives, timelines, stakeholders and interests that affect these issues. However, understanding the relationship between DDR and SSR can help identify synergies in policy and programming and provide ways of ensuring short to medium term activities associated with DDR are linked to broader efforts to support the development of an effec- tive, well-managed and accountable security sector. Ignoring how DDR and SSR affect each other may result in missed opportunities or unintended consequences that undermine broader security and development goals.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -186681,7 +186681,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2954, "Paragraph": "The Secretary-General\u2019s report Securing Peace and Development: the Role of the United Nations in Security Sector Reform (S\/2008\/39) of 23 January 2008 describes SSR as \u201ca process of assessment, review and implementation as well as monitoring and evalu- ation led by national authorities that has as its goal the enhancement of effective and accountable security for the State and its peoples without discrimination and with full respect for human rights and the rule of law.\u201d3 The security sector includes security pro- viders such as defence, law enforcement, intelligence and border management services as well as actors involved in management and oversight, notably government ministries, legislative bodies and relevant civil society actors. Non-state actors also fulfill important security provision, management and oversight functions. SSR therefore draws on a diverse range of stakeholders and may include activities as varied as political dialogue, policy and legal advice, training programmes and technical and financial assistance.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -186699,7 +186699,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2954, "Paragraph": "The Secretary-General\u2019s report Securing Peace and Development: the Role of the United Nations in Security Sector Reform (S\/2008\/39) of 23 January 2008 describes SSR as \u201ca process of assessment, review and implementation as well as monitoring and evalu- ation led by national authorities that has as its goal the enhancement of effective and accountable security for the State and its peoples without discrimination and with full respect for human rights and the rule of law.\u201d3 The security sector includes security pro- viders such as defence, law enforcement, intelligence and border management services as well as actors involved in management and oversight, notably government ministries, legislative bodies and relevant civil society actors. Non-state actors also fulfill important security provision, management and oversight functions. SSR therefore draws on a diverse range of stakeholders and may include activities as varied as political dialogue, policy and legal advice, training programmes and technical and financial assistance.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -186717,7 +186717,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2954, "Paragraph": "The Secretary-General\u2019s report Securing Peace and Development: the Role of the United Nations in Security Sector Reform (S\/2008\/39) of 23 January 2008 describes SSR as \u201ca process of assessment, review and implementation as well as monitoring and evalu- ation led by national authorities that has as its goal the enhancement of effective and accountable security for the State and its peoples without discrimination and with full respect for human rights and the rule of law.\u201d3 The security sector includes security pro- viders such as defence, law enforcement, intelligence and border management services as well as actors involved in management and oversight, notably government ministries, legislative bodies and relevant civil society actors. Non-state actors also fulfill important security provision, management and oversight functions. SSR therefore draws on a diverse range of stakeholders and may include activities as varied as political dialogue, policy and legal advice, training programmes and technical and financial assistance.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -186735,7 +186735,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2955, "Paragraph": "While individual activities can involve short term goals, achieving broader SSR objec- tives requires a long term perspective. In contrast, DDR tends to adopt a more narrow focus on ex-combatants and their dependents. Relevant activities and actors are often more clearly defined and limited while timelines generally focus on the short to medium-term period following the end of armed conflict. But the distinctions between DDR and SSR are potentially less important than the convergences. Both sets of activities are preoccupied with enhancing the security of the state and its citizens. They advocate policies and programmes that engage public and private security actors including the military and ex-combatants as well as groups responsible for their management and oversight. Decisions associated with DDR contribute to defining central elements of the size and composition of a country\u2019s security sector while the gains from carefully executed SSR programmes can also generate positive consequences on DDR interventions. SSR may lead to downsizing and the conse- quent need for reintegration. DDR may also free resources for SSR. Most significantly, considering these issues together situates DDR within a developing security governance framework. If conducted sensitively, this can contribute to the legitimacy and sustainability of DDR programmes by helping to ensure that decisions are based on a nationally-driven assessment of applicable capacities, objectives and values.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -186753,7 +186753,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2955, "Paragraph": "While individual activities can involve short term goals, achieving broader SSR objec- tives requires a long term perspective. In contrast, DDR tends to adopt a more narrow focus on ex-combatants and their dependents. Relevant activities and actors are often more clearly defined and limited while timelines generally focus on the short to medium-term period following the end of armed conflict. But the distinctions between DDR and SSR are potentially less important than the convergences. Both sets of activities are preoccupied with enhancing the security of the state and its citizens. They advocate policies and programmes that engage public and private security actors including the military and ex-combatants as well as groups responsible for their management and oversight. Decisions associated with DDR contribute to defining central elements of the size and composition of a country\u2019s security sector while the gains from carefully executed SSR programmes can also generate positive consequences on DDR interventions. SSR may lead to downsizing and the conse- quent need for reintegration. DDR may also free resources for SSR. Most significantly, considering these issues together situates DDR within a developing security governance framework. If conducted sensitively, this can contribute to the legitimacy and sustainability of DDR programmes by helping to ensure that decisions are based on a nationally-driven assessment of applicable capacities, objectives and values.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -186771,7 +186771,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2955, "Paragraph": "While individual activities can involve short term goals, achieving broader SSR objec- tives requires a long term perspective. In contrast, DDR tends to adopt a more narrow focus on ex-combatants and their dependents. Relevant activities and actors are often more clearly defined and limited while timelines generally focus on the short to medium-term period following the end of armed conflict. But the distinctions between DDR and SSR are potentially less important than the convergences. Both sets of activities are preoccupied with enhancing the security of the state and its citizens. They advocate policies and programmes that engage public and private security actors including the military and ex-combatants as well as groups responsible for their management and oversight. Decisions associated with DDR contribute to defining central elements of the size and composition of a country\u2019s security sector while the gains from carefully executed SSR programmes can also generate positive consequences on DDR interventions. SSR may lead to downsizing and the conse- quent need for reintegration. DDR may also free resources for SSR. Most significantly, considering these issues together situates DDR within a developing security governance framework. If conducted sensitively, this can contribute to the legitimacy and sustainability of DDR programmes by helping to ensure that decisions are based on a nationally-driven assessment of applicable capacities, objectives and values.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -186789,7 +186789,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2955, "Paragraph": "While individual activities can involve short term goals, achieving broader SSR objec- tives requires a long term perspective. In contrast, DDR tends to adopt a more narrow focus on ex-combatants and their dependents. Relevant activities and actors are often more clearly defined and limited while timelines generally focus on the short to medium-term period following the end of armed conflict. But the distinctions between DDR and SSR are potentially less important than the convergences. Both sets of activities are preoccupied with enhancing the security of the state and its citizens. They advocate policies and programmes that engage public and private security actors including the military and ex-combatants as well as groups responsible for their management and oversight. Decisions associated with DDR contribute to defining central elements of the size and composition of a country\u2019s security sector while the gains from carefully executed SSR programmes can also generate positive consequences on DDR interventions. SSR may lead to downsizing and the conse- quent need for reintegration. DDR may also free resources for SSR. Most significantly, considering these issues together situates DDR within a developing security governance framework. If conducted sensitively, this can contribute to the legitimacy and sustainability of DDR programmes by helping to ensure that decisions are based on a nationally-driven assessment of applicable capacities, objectives and values.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -186807,7 +186807,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2955, "Paragraph": "While individual activities can involve short term goals, achieving broader SSR objec- tives requires a long term perspective. In contrast, DDR tends to adopt a more narrow focus on ex-combatants and their dependents. Relevant activities and actors are often more clearly defined and limited while timelines generally focus on the short to medium-term period following the end of armed conflict. But the distinctions between DDR and SSR are potentially less important than the convergences. Both sets of activities are preoccupied with enhancing the security of the state and its citizens. They advocate policies and programmes that engage public and private security actors including the military and ex-combatants as well as groups responsible for their management and oversight. Decisions associated with DDR contribute to defining central elements of the size and composition of a country\u2019s security sector while the gains from carefully executed SSR programmes can also generate positive consequences on DDR interventions. SSR may lead to downsizing and the conse- quent need for reintegration. DDR may also free resources for SSR. Most significantly, considering these issues together situates DDR within a developing security governance framework. If conducted sensitively, this can contribute to the legitimacy and sustainability of DDR programmes by helping to ensure that decisions are based on a nationally-driven assessment of applicable capacities, objectives and values.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -186825,7 +186825,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2955, "Paragraph": "While individual activities can involve short term goals, achieving broader SSR objec- tives requires a long term perspective. In contrast, DDR tends to adopt a more narrow focus on ex-combatants and their dependents. Relevant activities and actors are often more clearly defined and limited while timelines generally focus on the short to medium-term period following the end of armed conflict. But the distinctions between DDR and SSR are potentially less important than the convergences. Both sets of activities are preoccupied with enhancing the security of the state and its citizens. They advocate policies and programmes that engage public and private security actors including the military and ex-combatants as well as groups responsible for their management and oversight. Decisions associated with DDR contribute to defining central elements of the size and composition of a country\u2019s security sector while the gains from carefully executed SSR programmes can also generate positive consequences on DDR interventions. SSR may lead to downsizing and the conse- quent need for reintegration. DDR may also free resources for SSR. Most significantly, considering these issues together situates DDR within a developing security governance framework. If conducted sensitively, this can contribute to the legitimacy and sustainability of DDR programmes by helping to ensure that decisions are based on a nationally-driven assessment of applicable capacities, objectives and values.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -186843,7 +186843,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2955, "Paragraph": "While individual activities can involve short term goals, achieving broader SSR objec- tives requires a long term perspective. In contrast, DDR tends to adopt a more narrow focus on ex-combatants and their dependents. Relevant activities and actors are often more clearly defined and limited while timelines generally focus on the short to medium-term period following the end of armed conflict. But the distinctions between DDR and SSR are potentially less important than the convergences. Both sets of activities are preoccupied with enhancing the security of the state and its citizens. They advocate policies and programmes that engage public and private security actors including the military and ex-combatants as well as groups responsible for their management and oversight. Decisions associated with DDR contribute to defining central elements of the size and composition of a country\u2019s security sector while the gains from carefully executed SSR programmes can also generate positive consequences on DDR interventions. SSR may lead to downsizing and the conse- quent need for reintegration. DDR may also free resources for SSR. Most significantly, considering these issues together situates DDR within a developing security governance framework. If conducted sensitively, this can contribute to the legitimacy and sustainability of DDR programmes by helping to ensure that decisions are based on a nationally-driven assessment of applicable capacities, objectives and values.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -186861,7 +186861,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2955, "Paragraph": "While individual activities can involve short term goals, achieving broader SSR objec- tives requires a long term perspective. In contrast, DDR tends to adopt a more narrow focus on ex-combatants and their dependents. Relevant activities and actors are often more clearly defined and limited while timelines generally focus on the short to medium-term period following the end of armed conflict. But the distinctions between DDR and SSR are potentially less important than the convergences. Both sets of activities are preoccupied with enhancing the security of the state and its citizens. They advocate policies and programmes that engage public and private security actors including the military and ex-combatants as well as groups responsible for their management and oversight. Decisions associated with DDR contribute to defining central elements of the size and composition of a country\u2019s security sector while the gains from carefully executed SSR programmes can also generate positive consequences on DDR interventions. SSR may lead to downsizing and the conse- quent need for reintegration. DDR may also free resources for SSR. Most significantly, considering these issues together situates DDR within a developing security governance framework. If conducted sensitively, this can contribute to the legitimacy and sustainability of DDR programmes by helping to ensure that decisions are based on a nationally-driven assessment of applicable capacities, objectives and values.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -186879,7 +186879,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2955, "Paragraph": "While individual activities can involve short term goals, achieving broader SSR objec- tives requires a long term perspective. In contrast, DDR tends to adopt a more narrow focus on ex-combatants and their dependents. Relevant activities and actors are often more clearly defined and limited while timelines generally focus on the short to medium-term period following the end of armed conflict. But the distinctions between DDR and SSR are potentially less important than the convergences. Both sets of activities are preoccupied with enhancing the security of the state and its citizens. They advocate policies and programmes that engage public and private security actors including the military and ex-combatants as well as groups responsible for their management and oversight. Decisions associated with DDR contribute to defining central elements of the size and composition of a country\u2019s security sector while the gains from carefully executed SSR programmes can also generate positive consequences on DDR interventions. SSR may lead to downsizing and the conse- quent need for reintegration. DDR may also free resources for SSR. Most significantly, considering these issues together situates DDR within a developing security governance framework. If conducted sensitively, this can contribute to the legitimacy and sustainability of DDR programmes by helping to ensure that decisions are based on a nationally-driven assessment of applicable capacities, objectives and values.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -186897,7 +186897,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2955, "Paragraph": "While individual activities can involve short term goals, achieving broader SSR objec- tives requires a long term perspective. In contrast, DDR tends to adopt a more narrow focus on ex-combatants and their dependents. Relevant activities and actors are often more clearly defined and limited while timelines generally focus on the short to medium-term period following the end of armed conflict. But the distinctions between DDR and SSR are potentially less important than the convergences. Both sets of activities are preoccupied with enhancing the security of the state and its citizens. They advocate policies and programmes that engage public and private security actors including the military and ex-combatants as well as groups responsible for their management and oversight. Decisions associated with DDR contribute to defining central elements of the size and composition of a country\u2019s security sector while the gains from carefully executed SSR programmes can also generate positive consequences on DDR interventions. SSR may lead to downsizing and the conse- quent need for reintegration. DDR may also free resources for SSR. Most significantly, considering these issues together situates DDR within a developing security governance framework. If conducted sensitively, this can contribute to the legitimacy and sustainability of DDR programmes by helping to ensure that decisions are based on a nationally-driven assessment of applicable capacities, objectives and values.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -186915,7 +186915,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2955, "Paragraph": "While individual activities can involve short term goals, achieving broader SSR objec- tives requires a long term perspective. In contrast, DDR tends to adopt a more narrow focus on ex-combatants and their dependents. Relevant activities and actors are often more clearly defined and limited while timelines generally focus on the short to medium-term period following the end of armed conflict. But the distinctions between DDR and SSR are potentially less important than the convergences. Both sets of activities are preoccupied with enhancing the security of the state and its citizens. They advocate policies and programmes that engage public and private security actors including the military and ex-combatants as well as groups responsible for their management and oversight. Decisions associated with DDR contribute to defining central elements of the size and composition of a country\u2019s security sector while the gains from carefully executed SSR programmes can also generate positive consequences on DDR interventions. SSR may lead to downsizing and the conse- quent need for reintegration. DDR may also free resources for SSR. Most significantly, considering these issues together situates DDR within a developing security governance framework. If conducted sensitively, this can contribute to the legitimacy and sustainability of DDR programmes by helping to ensure that decisions are based on a nationally-driven assessment of applicable capacities, objectives and values.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -186933,7 +186933,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2956, "Paragraph": "DDR and SSR play an important role in post-conflict efforts to prevent the resurgence of armed conflict and to create the conditions necessary for sustainable peace and longer term development.4 They form part of a broader post-conflict peacebuilding agenda that may include measures to address small arms and light weapons (SALW), mine action activi- ties or efforts to redress past crimes and promote reconciliation through transitional justice (see IDDRS 6.20 on DDR and Transitional Justice). The security challenges that these meas- ures seek to address are often the result of a state\u2019s loss of control over the legitimate use of force. DDR and SSR should therefore be understood as closely linked to processes of post- conflict statebuilding that enhance the ability of the state to deliver security and reinforce the rule of law. The complex, interrelated nature of these challenges has been reflected by the development of whole of system (e.g. \u2018one UN\u2019 or \u2018whole of government\u2019) approaches to supporting states emerging from conflict. The increasing drive towards such integrated approaches reflects a clear need to bridge early areas of post-conflict engagement with support to the consolidation of reconstruction and longer term development.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -186951,7 +186951,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2956, "Paragraph": "DDR and SSR play an important role in post-conflict efforts to prevent the resurgence of armed conflict and to create the conditions necessary for sustainable peace and longer term development.4 They form part of a broader post-conflict peacebuilding agenda that may include measures to address small arms and light weapons (SALW), mine action activi- ties or efforts to redress past crimes and promote reconciliation through transitional justice (see IDDRS 6.20 on DDR and Transitional Justice). The security challenges that these meas- ures seek to address are often the result of a state\u2019s loss of control over the legitimate use of force. DDR and SSR should therefore be understood as closely linked to processes of post- conflict statebuilding that enhance the ability of the state to deliver security and reinforce the rule of law. The complex, interrelated nature of these challenges has been reflected by the development of whole of system (e.g. \u2018one UN\u2019 or \u2018whole of government\u2019) approaches to supporting states emerging from conflict. The increasing drive towards such integrated approaches reflects a clear need to bridge early areas of post-conflict engagement with support to the consolidation of reconstruction and longer term development.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -186969,7 +186969,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2956, "Paragraph": "DDR and SSR play an important role in post-conflict efforts to prevent the resurgence of armed conflict and to create the conditions necessary for sustainable peace and longer term development.4 They form part of a broader post-conflict peacebuilding agenda that may include measures to address small arms and light weapons (SALW), mine action activi- ties or efforts to redress past crimes and promote reconciliation through transitional justice (see IDDRS 6.20 on DDR and Transitional Justice). The security challenges that these meas- ures seek to address are often the result of a state\u2019s loss of control over the legitimate use of force. DDR and SSR should therefore be understood as closely linked to processes of post- conflict statebuilding that enhance the ability of the state to deliver security and reinforce the rule of law. The complex, interrelated nature of these challenges has been reflected by the development of whole of system (e.g. \u2018one UN\u2019 or \u2018whole of government\u2019) approaches to supporting states emerging from conflict. The increasing drive towards such integrated approaches reflects a clear need to bridge early areas of post-conflict engagement with support to the consolidation of reconstruction and longer term development.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -186987,7 +186987,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2956, "Paragraph": "DDR and SSR play an important role in post-conflict efforts to prevent the resurgence of armed conflict and to create the conditions necessary for sustainable peace and longer term development.4 They form part of a broader post-conflict peacebuilding agenda that may include measures to address small arms and light weapons (SALW), mine action activi- ties or efforts to redress past crimes and promote reconciliation through transitional justice (see IDDRS 6.20 on DDR and Transitional Justice). The security challenges that these meas- ures seek to address are often the result of a state\u2019s loss of control over the legitimate use of force. DDR and SSR should therefore be understood as closely linked to processes of post- conflict statebuilding that enhance the ability of the state to deliver security and reinforce the rule of law. The complex, interrelated nature of these challenges has been reflected by the development of whole of system (e.g. \u2018one UN\u2019 or \u2018whole of government\u2019) approaches to supporting states emerging from conflict. The increasing drive towards such integrated approaches reflects a clear need to bridge early areas of post-conflict engagement with support to the consolidation of reconstruction and longer term development.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187005,7 +187005,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2956, "Paragraph": "DDR and SSR play an important role in post-conflict efforts to prevent the resurgence of armed conflict and to create the conditions necessary for sustainable peace and longer term development.4 They form part of a broader post-conflict peacebuilding agenda that may include measures to address small arms and light weapons (SALW), mine action activi- ties or efforts to redress past crimes and promote reconciliation through transitional justice (see IDDRS 6.20 on DDR and Transitional Justice). The security challenges that these meas- ures seek to address are often the result of a state\u2019s loss of control over the legitimate use of force. DDR and SSR should therefore be understood as closely linked to processes of post- conflict statebuilding that enhance the ability of the state to deliver security and reinforce the rule of law. The complex, interrelated nature of these challenges has been reflected by the development of whole of system (e.g. \u2018one UN\u2019 or \u2018whole of government\u2019) approaches to supporting states emerging from conflict. The increasing drive towards such integrated approaches reflects a clear need to bridge early areas of post-conflict engagement with support to the consolidation of reconstruction and longer term development.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187023,7 +187023,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2956, "Paragraph": "DDR and SSR play an important role in post-conflict efforts to prevent the resurgence of armed conflict and to create the conditions necessary for sustainable peace and longer term development.4 They form part of a broader post-conflict peacebuilding agenda that may include measures to address small arms and light weapons (SALW), mine action activi- ties or efforts to redress past crimes and promote reconciliation through transitional justice (see IDDRS 6.20 on DDR and Transitional Justice). The security challenges that these meas- ures seek to address are often the result of a state\u2019s loss of control over the legitimate use of force. DDR and SSR should therefore be understood as closely linked to processes of post- conflict statebuilding that enhance the ability of the state to deliver security and reinforce the rule of law. The complex, interrelated nature of these challenges has been reflected by the development of whole of system (e.g. \u2018one UN\u2019 or \u2018whole of government\u2019) approaches to supporting states emerging from conflict. The increasing drive towards such integrated approaches reflects a clear need to bridge early areas of post-conflict engagement with support to the consolidation of reconstruction and longer term development.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187041,7 +187041,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2957, "Paragraph": "An important point of departure for this module is the inherently political nature of DDR and SSR. DDR and SSR processes will only be successful if they acknowledge the need to develop sufficient political will to drive and build synergies between them.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187059,7 +187059,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2957, "Paragraph": "An important point of departure for this module is the inherently political nature of DDR and SSR. DDR and SSR processes will only be successful if they acknowledge the need to develop sufficient political will to drive and build synergies between them.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187075,9 +187075,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2958, - "Paragraph": "Box 1 DDR\/SSR dynamics \\n DDR shapes the terrain for SSR by influencing the size and nature of the security sector \\n Successful DDR can free up resources for SSR activities that in turn may support the development of efficient, affordable security structures \\n A national vision of the security sector should provide the basis for decisions on force size and structure \\n SSR considerations should help determine criteria for the integration of ex-combatants in different parts of the formal\/informal security sector \\n DDR and SSR offer complementary approaches that can link reintegration of ex-combatants to enhancing community security \\n Capacity-building for security management and oversight bodies provide a means to enhance the sustainability and legitimacy of DDR and SSR", + "Paragraph": "Box 1 DDR\/SSR dynamics \n DDR shapes the terrain for SSR by influencing the size and nature of the security sector \n Successful DDR can free up resources for SSR activities that in turn may support the development of efficient, affordable security structures \n A national vision of the security sector should provide the basis for decisions on force size and structure \n SSR considerations should help determine criteria for the integration of ex-combatants in different parts of the formal\/informal security sector \n DDR and SSR offer complementary approaches that can link reintegration of ex-combatants to enhancing community security \n Capacity-building for security management and oversight bodies provide a means to enhance the sustainability and legitimacy of DDR and SSR", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187086,7 +187086,7 @@ "Heading2": "3.1. Why are DDR-SSR dynamics important?", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Box 1 DDR\/SSR dynamics \\n DDR shapes the terrain for SSR by influencing the size and nature of the security sector \\n Successful DDR can free up resources for SSR activities that in turn may support the development of efficient, affordable security structures \\n A national vision of the security sector should provide the basis for decisions on force size and structure \\n SSR considerations should help determine criteria for the integration of ex-combatants in different parts of the formal\/informal security sector \\n DDR and SSR offer complementary approaches that can link reintegration of ex-combatants to enhancing community security \\n Capacity-building for security management and oversight bodies provide a means to enhance the sustainability and legitimacy of DDR and SSR", + "Sentence": "Box 1 DDR\/SSR dynamics \n DDR shapes the terrain for SSR by influencing the size and nature of the security sector \n Successful DDR can free up resources for SSR activities that in turn may support the development of efficient, affordable security structures \n A national vision of the security sector should provide the basis for decisions on force size and structure \n SSR considerations should help determine criteria for the integration of ex-combatants in different parts of the formal\/informal security sector \n DDR and SSR offer complementary approaches that can link reintegration of ex-combatants to enhancing community security \n Capacity-building for security management and oversight bodies provide a means to enhance the sustainability and legitimacy of DDR and SSR", "newParagraph": "box 1 ddrssr dynamic n ddr shape terrain ssr influencing size nature security sector n successful ddr free resource ssr activity turn may support development efficient affordable security structure n national vision security sector provide basis decision force size structure n ssr consideration help determine criterion integration excombatants different part formalinformal security sector n ddr ssr offer complementary approach link reintegration excombatants enhancing community security n capacitybuilding security management oversight body provide mean enhance sustainability legitimacy ddr ssr", "ProcessedSent": "box 1 ddrssr dynamic n ddr shape terrain ssr influencing size nature security sector n successful ddr free resource ssr activity turn may support development efficient affordable security structure n national vision security sector provide basis decision force size structure n ssr consideration help determine criterion integration excombatants different part formalinformal security sector n ddr ssr offer complementary approach link reintegration excombatants enhancing community security n capacitybuilding security management oversight body provide mean enhance sustainability legitimacy ddr ssr", "SentID": 10393 @@ -187095,7 +187095,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2959, "Paragraph": "This reflects the sensitivity of issues that touch directly on internal power relations, sover- eignty and national security as well as the fact that decisions in both areas create \u2018winners\u2019 and \u2018losers.\u2019 In order to avoid doing more harm than good, related policies and programmes must be grounded in a close understanding of context-specific political, socio-economic and security factors. Understanding \u2018what the market will bear\u2019 and ensuring that activities and how they are sequenced incorporate practical constraints are crucial considerations for assessments, programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187113,7 +187113,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2959, "Paragraph": "This reflects the sensitivity of issues that touch directly on internal power relations, sover- eignty and national security as well as the fact that decisions in both areas create \u2018winners\u2019 and \u2018losers.\u2019 In order to avoid doing more harm than good, related policies and programmes must be grounded in a close understanding of context-specific political, socio-economic and security factors. Understanding \u2018what the market will bear\u2019 and ensuring that activities and how they are sequenced incorporate practical constraints are crucial considerations for assessments, programme design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187131,7 +187131,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2960, "Paragraph": "The core objective of SSR is \u201cthe enhancement of effective and accountable security for the state and its peoples.\u201d5 This underlines an emerging consensus that insists on the need to link effective and efficient provision of security to a framework of democratic gov- ernance and the rule of law.6 If one legacy of conflict is mistrust between the state, security providers and citizens, supporting participative processes that enhance the oversight roles of actors such as parliament and civil society7 can meet a common DDR\/SSR goal of build- ing trust in post-conflict security governance institutions. Oversight mechanisms can provide necessary checks and balances to ensure that national decisions on DDR and SSR are appro- priate, cost effective and made in a transparent manner.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187149,7 +187149,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2960, "Paragraph": "The core objective of SSR is \u201cthe enhancement of effective and accountable security for the state and its peoples.\u201d5 This underlines an emerging consensus that insists on the need to link effective and efficient provision of security to a framework of democratic gov- ernance and the rule of law.6 If one legacy of conflict is mistrust between the state, security providers and citizens, supporting participative processes that enhance the oversight roles of actors such as parliament and civil society7 can meet a common DDR\/SSR goal of build- ing trust in post-conflict security governance institutions. Oversight mechanisms can provide necessary checks and balances to ensure that national decisions on DDR and SSR are appro- priate, cost effective and made in a transparent manner.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187167,7 +187167,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2961, "Paragraph": "A number of DDR and SSR activities have been challenged for their lack of context-specificity and flexibility, leading to questions concerning their effectiveness when weighed against the major investments such activities entail.8 The lack of coordination between bilateral and multilateral partners that support these activities is widely acknowledged as a contrib- uting factor: stovepiped or contradictory approaches each present major obstacles to pro- viding mutually reinforcing support to DDR and SSR. The UN\u2019s legitimacy, early presence on the ground and scope of its activities points to an important coordinating role that can help to address challenges of coordination and coherence within the international commu- nity in these areas.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187185,7 +187185,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2961, "Paragraph": "A number of DDR and SSR activities have been challenged for their lack of context-specificity and flexibility, leading to questions concerning their effectiveness when weighed against the major investments such activities entail.8 The lack of coordination between bilateral and multilateral partners that support these activities is widely acknowledged as a contrib- uting factor: stovepiped or contradictory approaches each present major obstacles to pro- viding mutually reinforcing support to DDR and SSR. The UN\u2019s legitimacy, early presence on the ground and scope of its activities points to an important coordinating role that can help to address challenges of coordination and coherence within the international commu- nity in these areas.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187203,7 +187203,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2962, "Paragraph": "A lack of conceptual clarity on \u2018SSR\u2019 has had negative consequences for the division of responsibilities, prioritisation of tasks and allocation of resources.9 Understandings of the constituent activities within DDR are relatively well-established. On the other hand, while common definitions of SSR may be emerging at a policy level, these are often not reflected in programming. This situation is further complicated by the absence of clear indicators for success in both areas. Providing clarity on the scope of activities and linking these to a desired end state provide an important starting point to better understanding the relationship between DDR and SSR.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187221,7 +187221,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2962, "Paragraph": "A lack of conceptual clarity on \u2018SSR\u2019 has had negative consequences for the division of responsibilities, prioritisation of tasks and allocation of resources.9 Understandings of the constituent activities within DDR are relatively well-established. On the other hand, while common definitions of SSR may be emerging at a policy level, these are often not reflected in programming. This situation is further complicated by the absence of clear indicators for success in both areas. Providing clarity on the scope of activities and linking these to a desired end state provide an important starting point to better understanding the relationship between DDR and SSR.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187239,7 +187239,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2962, "Paragraph": "A lack of conceptual clarity on \u2018SSR\u2019 has had negative consequences for the division of responsibilities, prioritisation of tasks and allocation of resources.9 Understandings of the constituent activities within DDR are relatively well-established. On the other hand, while common definitions of SSR may be emerging at a policy level, these are often not reflected in programming. This situation is further complicated by the absence of clear indicators for success in both areas. Providing clarity on the scope of activities and linking these to a desired end state provide an important starting point to better understanding the relationship between DDR and SSR.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187257,7 +187257,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2962, "Paragraph": "A lack of conceptual clarity on \u2018SSR\u2019 has had negative consequences for the division of responsibilities, prioritisation of tasks and allocation of resources.9 Understandings of the constituent activities within DDR are relatively well-established. On the other hand, while common definitions of SSR may be emerging at a policy level, these are often not reflected in programming. This situation is further complicated by the absence of clear indicators for success in both areas. Providing clarity on the scope of activities and linking these to a desired end state provide an important starting point to better understanding the relationship between DDR and SSR.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187275,7 +187275,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2963, "Paragraph": "Both DDR and SSR should be nationally owned and designed to fit the circumstances of each particular country. However, the engagement by the international community in these areas is routinely criticised for failing to apply these key principles in practice. SSR in particular is viewed by some as a vehicle for imposing externally driven objectives and approaches. In part, this reflects the particular challenges of post-conflict environments, including weak or illegitimate institutions, shortage of capacity amongst national actors, a lack of political will and the marginalisation of civil society. There is a need to recognise these context-specific sensitivities and ensure that approaches are built around the contributions of a broad cross-section of national stakeholders. Prioritising support for the development of national capacities to develop effective, legitimate and sustainable security institutions is essential to meeting common DDR\/SSR goals.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187293,7 +187293,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2963, "Paragraph": "Both DDR and SSR should be nationally owned and designed to fit the circumstances of each particular country. However, the engagement by the international community in these areas is routinely criticised for failing to apply these key principles in practice. SSR in particular is viewed by some as a vehicle for imposing externally driven objectives and approaches. In part, this reflects the particular challenges of post-conflict environments, including weak or illegitimate institutions, shortage of capacity amongst national actors, a lack of political will and the marginalisation of civil society. There is a need to recognise these context-specific sensitivities and ensure that approaches are built around the contributions of a broad cross-section of national stakeholders. Prioritising support for the development of national capacities to develop effective, legitimate and sustainable security institutions is essential to meeting common DDR\/SSR goals.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187311,7 +187311,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2963, "Paragraph": "Both DDR and SSR should be nationally owned and designed to fit the circumstances of each particular country. However, the engagement by the international community in these areas is routinely criticised for failing to apply these key principles in practice. SSR in particular is viewed by some as a vehicle for imposing externally driven objectives and approaches. In part, this reflects the particular challenges of post-conflict environments, including weak or illegitimate institutions, shortage of capacity amongst national actors, a lack of political will and the marginalisation of civil society. There is a need to recognise these context-specific sensitivities and ensure that approaches are built around the contributions of a broad cross-section of national stakeholders. Prioritising support for the development of national capacities to develop effective, legitimate and sustainable security institutions is essential to meeting common DDR\/SSR goals.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187329,7 +187329,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2963, "Paragraph": "Both DDR and SSR should be nationally owned and designed to fit the circumstances of each particular country. However, the engagement by the international community in these areas is routinely criticised for failing to apply these key principles in practice. SSR in particular is viewed by some as a vehicle for imposing externally driven objectives and approaches. In part, this reflects the particular challenges of post-conflict environments, including weak or illegitimate institutions, shortage of capacity amongst national actors, a lack of political will and the marginalisation of civil society. There is a need to recognise these context-specific sensitivities and ensure that approaches are built around the contributions of a broad cross-section of national stakeholders. Prioritising support for the development of national capacities to develop effective, legitimate and sustainable security institutions is essential to meeting common DDR\/SSR goals.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187347,7 +187347,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2963, "Paragraph": "Both DDR and SSR should be nationally owned and designed to fit the circumstances of each particular country. However, the engagement by the international community in these areas is routinely criticised for failing to apply these key principles in practice. SSR in particular is viewed by some as a vehicle for imposing externally driven objectives and approaches. In part, this reflects the particular challenges of post-conflict environments, including weak or illegitimate institutions, shortage of capacity amongst national actors, a lack of political will and the marginalisation of civil society. There is a need to recognise these context-specific sensitivities and ensure that approaches are built around the contributions of a broad cross-section of national stakeholders. Prioritising support for the development of national capacities to develop effective, legitimate and sustainable security institutions is essential to meeting common DDR\/SSR goals.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187365,7 +187365,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2963, "Paragraph": "Both DDR and SSR should be nationally owned and designed to fit the circumstances of each particular country. However, the engagement by the international community in these areas is routinely criticised for failing to apply these key principles in practice. SSR in particular is viewed by some as a vehicle for imposing externally driven objectives and approaches. In part, this reflects the particular challenges of post-conflict environments, including weak or illegitimate institutions, shortage of capacity amongst national actors, a lack of political will and the marginalisation of civil society. There is a need to recognise these context-specific sensitivities and ensure that approaches are built around the contributions of a broad cross-section of national stakeholders. Prioritising support for the development of national capacities to develop effective, legitimate and sustainable security institutions is essential to meeting common DDR\/SSR goals.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187383,7 +187383,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2964, "Paragraph": "Following a summary of applicable UN institutional mandates and responsibilities (Section 4), this module outlines a rationale for the appropriate linkage of DDR and SSR (Section 5) and sets out a number of guiding principles common to the UN approach to both sets of activities (Section 6). Important DDR-SSR dynamics before and during demo- bilization (Section 7) and before and during repatriation and reintegration (Section 8) are then considered. Operationalising the DDR-SSR nexus in different elements of the pro- gramme cycle and consideration of potential entry points (Section 9) is followed by a focus on national and international capacities in these areas (Section 10). The module concludes with a checklist that is intended as a point of departure for the development of context- specific policies and programmes that take into account the relationship between DDR and SSR (Section 11).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187401,7 +187401,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2964, "Paragraph": "Following a summary of applicable UN institutional mandates and responsibilities (Section 4), this module outlines a rationale for the appropriate linkage of DDR and SSR (Section 5) and sets out a number of guiding principles common to the UN approach to both sets of activities (Section 6). Important DDR-SSR dynamics before and during demo- bilization (Section 7) and before and during repatriation and reintegration (Section 8) are then considered. Operationalising the DDR-SSR nexus in different elements of the pro- gramme cycle and consideration of potential entry points (Section 9) is followed by a focus on national and international capacities in these areas (Section 10). The module concludes with a checklist that is intended as a point of departure for the development of context- specific policies and programmes that take into account the relationship between DDR and SSR (Section 11).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187419,7 +187419,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2964, "Paragraph": "Following a summary of applicable UN institutional mandates and responsibilities (Section 4), this module outlines a rationale for the appropriate linkage of DDR and SSR (Section 5) and sets out a number of guiding principles common to the UN approach to both sets of activities (Section 6). Important DDR-SSR dynamics before and during demo- bilization (Section 7) and before and during repatriation and reintegration (Section 8) are then considered. Operationalising the DDR-SSR nexus in different elements of the pro- gramme cycle and consideration of potential entry points (Section 9) is followed by a focus on national and international capacities in these areas (Section 10). The module concludes with a checklist that is intended as a point of departure for the development of context- specific policies and programmes that take into account the relationship between DDR and SSR (Section 11).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187437,7 +187437,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2964, "Paragraph": "Following a summary of applicable UN institutional mandates and responsibilities (Section 4), this module outlines a rationale for the appropriate linkage of DDR and SSR (Section 5) and sets out a number of guiding principles common to the UN approach to both sets of activities (Section 6). Important DDR-SSR dynamics before and during demo- bilization (Section 7) and before and during repatriation and reintegration (Section 8) are then considered. Operationalising the DDR-SSR nexus in different elements of the pro- gramme cycle and consideration of potential entry points (Section 9) is followed by a focus on national and international capacities in these areas (Section 10). The module concludes with a checklist that is intended as a point of departure for the development of context- specific policies and programmes that take into account the relationship between DDR and SSR (Section 11).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187453,9 +187453,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2965, - "Paragraph": "A number of UN documents address the interrelated issues of DDR, SSR and rule of law. Short summaries of some of the following key documents are included in Annex \u2018A\u2019 to this module: \\n Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cThe role of United Nations Peacekeeping in disarm- ament, demobilization and reintegration\u201d of 11 February 2000 (S\/2000\/101) \\n Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies\u201d of 3 August 2004 (S\/2004\/616) \\n Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration\u201d of 2 March 2006 (A\/60\/705) \\n Presidential Statement on \u201cMaintenance of international peace and security: role of the Security Council in supporting security sector reform\u201d of 21 February 2007 (S\/PRST\/ 2007\/3); \\n Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform\u201d of 23 January 2008 (S\/2008\/39); \\n Presidential Statement on \u201cMaintenance of international peace and security: role of the Security Council in supporting security sector reform\u201d of 12 May 2008 (S\/PRST\/ 2008\/14).", + "Paragraph": "A number of UN documents address the interrelated issues of DDR, SSR and rule of law. Short summaries of some of the following key documents are included in Annex \u2018A\u2019 to this module: \n Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cThe role of United Nations Peacekeeping in disarm- ament, demobilization and reintegration\u201d of 11 February 2000 (S\/2000\/101) \n Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies\u201d of 3 August 2004 (S\/2004\/616) \n Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration\u201d of 2 March 2006 (A\/60\/705) \n Presidential Statement on \u201cMaintenance of international peace and security: role of the Security Council in supporting security sector reform\u201d of 21 February 2007 (S\/PRST\/ 2007\/3); \n Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform\u201d of 23 January 2008 (S\/2008\/39); \n Presidential Statement on \u201cMaintenance of international peace and security: role of the Security Council in supporting security sector reform\u201d of 12 May 2008 (S\/PRST\/ 2008\/14).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187471,9 +187471,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2965, - "Paragraph": "A number of UN documents address the interrelated issues of DDR, SSR and rule of law. Short summaries of some of the following key documents are included in Annex \u2018A\u2019 to this module: \\n Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cThe role of United Nations Peacekeeping in disarm- ament, demobilization and reintegration\u201d of 11 February 2000 (S\/2000\/101) \\n Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies\u201d of 3 August 2004 (S\/2004\/616) \\n Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration\u201d of 2 March 2006 (A\/60\/705) \\n Presidential Statement on \u201cMaintenance of international peace and security: role of the Security Council in supporting security sector reform\u201d of 21 February 2007 (S\/PRST\/ 2007\/3); \\n Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform\u201d of 23 January 2008 (S\/2008\/39); \\n Presidential Statement on \u201cMaintenance of international peace and security: role of the Security Council in supporting security sector reform\u201d of 12 May 2008 (S\/PRST\/ 2008\/14).", + "Paragraph": "A number of UN documents address the interrelated issues of DDR, SSR and rule of law. Short summaries of some of the following key documents are included in Annex \u2018A\u2019 to this module: \n Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cThe role of United Nations Peacekeeping in disarm- ament, demobilization and reintegration\u201d of 11 February 2000 (S\/2000\/101) \n Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies\u201d of 3 August 2004 (S\/2004\/616) \n Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration\u201d of 2 March 2006 (A\/60\/705) \n Presidential Statement on \u201cMaintenance of international peace and security: role of the Security Council in supporting security sector reform\u201d of 21 February 2007 (S\/PRST\/ 2007\/3); \n Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform\u201d of 23 January 2008 (S\/2008\/39); \n Presidential Statement on \u201cMaintenance of international peace and security: role of the Security Council in supporting security sector reform\u201d of 12 May 2008 (S\/PRST\/ 2008\/14).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187482,7 +187482,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Short summaries of some of the following key documents are included in Annex \u2018A\u2019 to this module: \\n Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cThe role of United Nations Peacekeeping in disarm- ament, demobilization and reintegration\u201d of 11 February 2000 (S\/2000\/101) \\n Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies\u201d of 3 August 2004 (S\/2004\/616) \\n Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration\u201d of 2 March 2006 (A\/60\/705) \\n Presidential Statement on \u201cMaintenance of international peace and security: role of the Security Council in supporting security sector reform\u201d of 21 February 2007 (S\/PRST\/ 2007\/3); \\n Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform\u201d of 23 January 2008 (S\/2008\/39); \\n Presidential Statement on \u201cMaintenance of international peace and security: role of the Security Council in supporting security sector reform\u201d of 12 May 2008 (S\/PRST\/ 2008\/14).", + "Sentence": "Short summaries of some of the following key documents are included in Annex \u2018A\u2019 to this module: \n Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cThe role of United Nations Peacekeeping in disarm- ament, demobilization and reintegration\u201d of 11 February 2000 (S\/2000\/101) \n Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies\u201d of 3 August 2004 (S\/2004\/616) \n Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration\u201d of 2 March 2006 (A\/60\/705) \n Presidential Statement on \u201cMaintenance of international peace and security: role of the Security Council in supporting security sector reform\u201d of 21 February 2007 (S\/PRST\/ 2007\/3); \n Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform\u201d of 23 January 2008 (S\/2008\/39); \n Presidential Statement on \u201cMaintenance of international peace and security: role of the Security Council in supporting security sector reform\u201d of 12 May 2008 (S\/PRST\/ 2008\/14).", "newParagraph": "number un document address interrelated issue ddr ssr rule law short summary following key document included annex module n report secretarygeneral role united nation peacekeeping disarm ament demobilization reintegration 11 february 2000 s2000101 n report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society 3 august 2004 s2004616 n report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration 2 march 2006 a60705 n presidential statement maintenance international peace security role security council supporting security sector reform 21 february 2007 sprst 20073 n report secretarygeneral securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform 23 january 2008 s200839 n presidential statement maintenance international peace security role security council supporting security sector reform 12 may 2008 sprst 200814", "ProcessedSent": "short summary following key document included annex module n report secretarygeneral role united nation peacekeeping disarm ament demobilization reintegration 11 february 2000 s2000101 n report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society 3 august 2004 s2004616 n report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration 2 march 2006 a60705 n presidential statement maintenance international peace security role security council supporting security sector reform 21 february 2007 sprst 20073 n report secretarygeneral securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform 23 january 2008 s200839 n presidential statement maintenance international peace security role security council supporting security sector reform 12 may 2008 sprst 200814", "SentID": 10415 @@ -187491,7 +187491,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2966, "Paragraph": "Considering the relationship between DDR \u2018design\u2019 and the appropriate parameters of a state\u2019s security sector provides an important dimension to shape strategic decision making and thus to broader processes of national policy formulation and implementation. The con- siderations outlined below suggest ways that different components of DDR and SSR can relate to each other.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187509,7 +187509,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2966, "Paragraph": "Considering the relationship between DDR \u2018design\u2019 and the appropriate parameters of a state\u2019s security sector provides an important dimension to shape strategic decision making and thus to broader processes of national policy formulation and implementation. The con- siderations outlined below suggest ways that different components of DDR and SSR can relate to each other.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187525,9 +187525,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2967, - "Paragraph": "Disarmament \\n Disarmament is not just a short term security measure designed to collect surplus weapons and ammunition. It is also implicitly part of a broader process of state regulation and con- trol over the transfer, trafficking and use of weapons within a national territory. As with civilian disarmament, disarming former combatants should be based on a level of confi- dence that can be fostered through broader SSR measures (such as police or corrections reform). These can contribute jointly to an increased level of community security and pro- vide the necessary reassurance that these weapons are no longer necessary. There are also direct linkages between disarmament of ex-combatants and efforts to strengthen border management capacities, particularly in light of unrestricted flows of arms (and combatants) across porous borders in conflict-prone regions.", + "Paragraph": "Disarmament \n Disarmament is not just a short term security measure designed to collect surplus weapons and ammunition. It is also implicitly part of a broader process of state regulation and con- trol over the transfer, trafficking and use of weapons within a national territory. As with civilian disarmament, disarming former combatants should be based on a level of confi- dence that can be fostered through broader SSR measures (such as police or corrections reform). These can contribute jointly to an increased level of community security and pro- vide the necessary reassurance that these weapons are no longer necessary. There are also direct linkages between disarmament of ex-combatants and efforts to strengthen border management capacities, particularly in light of unrestricted flows of arms (and combatants) across porous borders in conflict-prone regions.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187536,16 +187536,16 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Disarmament \\n Disarmament is not just a short term security measure designed to collect surplus weapons and ammunition.", + "Sentence": "Disarmament \n Disarmament is not just a short term security measure designed to collect surplus weapons and ammunition.", "newParagraph": "disarmament n disarmament short term security measure designed collect surplus weapon ammunition also implicitly part broader process state regulation con trol transfer trafficking use weapon within national territory civilian disarmament disarming former combatant based level confi dence fostered broader ssr measure police correction reform contribute jointly increased level community security pro vide necessary reassurance weapon longer necessary also direct linkage disarmament excombatants effort strengthen border management capacity particularly light unrestricted flow arm combatant across porous border conflictprone region", "ProcessedSent": "disarmament n disarmament short term security measure designed collect surplus weapon ammunition", "SentID": 10418 }, { "ParagraphID": 2967, - "Paragraph": "Disarmament \\n Disarmament is not just a short term security measure designed to collect surplus weapons and ammunition. It is also implicitly part of a broader process of state regulation and con- trol over the transfer, trafficking and use of weapons within a national territory. As with civilian disarmament, disarming former combatants should be based on a level of confi- dence that can be fostered through broader SSR measures (such as police or corrections reform). These can contribute jointly to an increased level of community security and pro- vide the necessary reassurance that these weapons are no longer necessary. There are also direct linkages between disarmament of ex-combatants and efforts to strengthen border management capacities, particularly in light of unrestricted flows of arms (and combatants) across porous borders in conflict-prone regions.", + "Paragraph": "Disarmament \n Disarmament is not just a short term security measure designed to collect surplus weapons and ammunition. It is also implicitly part of a broader process of state regulation and con- trol over the transfer, trafficking and use of weapons within a national territory. As with civilian disarmament, disarming former combatants should be based on a level of confi- dence that can be fostered through broader SSR measures (such as police or corrections reform). These can contribute jointly to an increased level of community security and pro- vide the necessary reassurance that these weapons are no longer necessary. There are also direct linkages between disarmament of ex-combatants and efforts to strengthen border management capacities, particularly in light of unrestricted flows of arms (and combatants) across porous borders in conflict-prone regions.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187561,9 +187561,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2967, - "Paragraph": "Disarmament \\n Disarmament is not just a short term security measure designed to collect surplus weapons and ammunition. It is also implicitly part of a broader process of state regulation and con- trol over the transfer, trafficking and use of weapons within a national territory. As with civilian disarmament, disarming former combatants should be based on a level of confi- dence that can be fostered through broader SSR measures (such as police or corrections reform). These can contribute jointly to an increased level of community security and pro- vide the necessary reassurance that these weapons are no longer necessary. There are also direct linkages between disarmament of ex-combatants and efforts to strengthen border management capacities, particularly in light of unrestricted flows of arms (and combatants) across porous borders in conflict-prone regions.", + "Paragraph": "Disarmament \n Disarmament is not just a short term security measure designed to collect surplus weapons and ammunition. It is also implicitly part of a broader process of state regulation and con- trol over the transfer, trafficking and use of weapons within a national territory. As with civilian disarmament, disarming former combatants should be based on a level of confi- dence that can be fostered through broader SSR measures (such as police or corrections reform). These can contribute jointly to an increased level of community security and pro- vide the necessary reassurance that these weapons are no longer necessary. There are also direct linkages between disarmament of ex-combatants and efforts to strengthen border management capacities, particularly in light of unrestricted flows of arms (and combatants) across porous borders in conflict-prone regions.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187579,9 +187579,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2967, - "Paragraph": "Disarmament \\n Disarmament is not just a short term security measure designed to collect surplus weapons and ammunition. It is also implicitly part of a broader process of state regulation and con- trol over the transfer, trafficking and use of weapons within a national territory. As with civilian disarmament, disarming former combatants should be based on a level of confi- dence that can be fostered through broader SSR measures (such as police or corrections reform). These can contribute jointly to an increased level of community security and pro- vide the necessary reassurance that these weapons are no longer necessary. There are also direct linkages between disarmament of ex-combatants and efforts to strengthen border management capacities, particularly in light of unrestricted flows of arms (and combatants) across porous borders in conflict-prone regions.", + "Paragraph": "Disarmament \n Disarmament is not just a short term security measure designed to collect surplus weapons and ammunition. It is also implicitly part of a broader process of state regulation and con- trol over the transfer, trafficking and use of weapons within a national territory. As with civilian disarmament, disarming former combatants should be based on a level of confi- dence that can be fostered through broader SSR measures (such as police or corrections reform). These can contribute jointly to an increased level of community security and pro- vide the necessary reassurance that these weapons are no longer necessary. There are also direct linkages between disarmament of ex-combatants and efforts to strengthen border management capacities, particularly in light of unrestricted flows of arms (and combatants) across porous borders in conflict-prone regions.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187597,9 +187597,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2967, - "Paragraph": "Disarmament \\n Disarmament is not just a short term security measure designed to collect surplus weapons and ammunition. It is also implicitly part of a broader process of state regulation and con- trol over the transfer, trafficking and use of weapons within a national territory. As with civilian disarmament, disarming former combatants should be based on a level of confi- dence that can be fostered through broader SSR measures (such as police or corrections reform). These can contribute jointly to an increased level of community security and pro- vide the necessary reassurance that these weapons are no longer necessary. There are also direct linkages between disarmament of ex-combatants and efforts to strengthen border management capacities, particularly in light of unrestricted flows of arms (and combatants) across porous borders in conflict-prone regions.", + "Paragraph": "Disarmament \n Disarmament is not just a short term security measure designed to collect surplus weapons and ammunition. It is also implicitly part of a broader process of state regulation and con- trol over the transfer, trafficking and use of weapons within a national territory. As with civilian disarmament, disarming former combatants should be based on a level of confi- dence that can be fostered through broader SSR measures (such as police or corrections reform). These can contribute jointly to an increased level of community security and pro- vide the necessary reassurance that these weapons are no longer necessary. There are also direct linkages between disarmament of ex-combatants and efforts to strengthen border management capacities, particularly in light of unrestricted flows of arms (and combatants) across porous borders in conflict-prone regions.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187615,9 +187615,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2968, - "Paragraph": "Demobilization \\n While often treated narrowly as a feature of DDR, demobilization can also be conceived within an SSR framework more generally. Where decisions affecting force size and structure provide for inefficient, unaffordable or abusive security structures this will undermine long term peace and security. Decisions should therefore be based on a rational, inclusive assess- ment by national actors of the objectives, role and values of the future security sector. One important element of the relationship between demobilization and SSR relates to the impor- tance of avoiding security vacuums. Ensuring that decisions on both the structures estab- lished to house the demobilization process and the return of demobilised ex-combatants are taken in parallel with complementary community law enforcement activities can miti- gate this concern. The security implications of cross-border flows of ex-combatants also highlight the positive relationship between demobilization and border security.", + "Paragraph": "Demobilization \n While often treated narrowly as a feature of DDR, demobilization can also be conceived within an SSR framework more generally. Where decisions affecting force size and structure provide for inefficient, unaffordable or abusive security structures this will undermine long term peace and security. Decisions should therefore be based on a rational, inclusive assess- ment by national actors of the objectives, role and values of the future security sector. One important element of the relationship between demobilization and SSR relates to the impor- tance of avoiding security vacuums. Ensuring that decisions on both the structures estab- lished to house the demobilization process and the return of demobilised ex-combatants are taken in parallel with complementary community law enforcement activities can miti- gate this concern. The security implications of cross-border flows of ex-combatants also highlight the positive relationship between demobilization and border security.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187626,16 +187626,16 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Demobilization \\n While often treated narrowly as a feature of DDR, demobilization can also be conceived within an SSR framework more generally.", + "Sentence": "Demobilization \n While often treated narrowly as a feature of DDR, demobilization can also be conceived within an SSR framework more generally.", "newParagraph": "demobilization n often treated narrowly feature ddr demobilization also conceived within ssr framework generally decision affecting force size structure provide inefficient unaffordable abusive security structure undermine long term peace security decision therefore based rational inclusive ass ment national actor objective role value future security sector one important element relationship demobilization ssr relates impor tance avoiding security vacuum ensuring decision structure estab lished house demobilization process return demobilised excombatants taken parallel complementary community law enforcement activity miti gate concern security implication crossborder flow excombatants also highlight positive relationship demobilization border security", "ProcessedSent": "demobilization n often treated narrowly feature ddr demobilization also conceived within ssr framework generally", "SentID": 10423 }, { "ParagraphID": 2968, - "Paragraph": "Demobilization \\n While often treated narrowly as a feature of DDR, demobilization can also be conceived within an SSR framework more generally. Where decisions affecting force size and structure provide for inefficient, unaffordable or abusive security structures this will undermine long term peace and security. Decisions should therefore be based on a rational, inclusive assess- ment by national actors of the objectives, role and values of the future security sector. One important element of the relationship between demobilization and SSR relates to the impor- tance of avoiding security vacuums. Ensuring that decisions on both the structures estab- lished to house the demobilization process and the return of demobilised ex-combatants are taken in parallel with complementary community law enforcement activities can miti- gate this concern. The security implications of cross-border flows of ex-combatants also highlight the positive relationship between demobilization and border security.", + "Paragraph": "Demobilization \n While often treated narrowly as a feature of DDR, demobilization can also be conceived within an SSR framework more generally. Where decisions affecting force size and structure provide for inefficient, unaffordable or abusive security structures this will undermine long term peace and security. Decisions should therefore be based on a rational, inclusive assess- ment by national actors of the objectives, role and values of the future security sector. One important element of the relationship between demobilization and SSR relates to the impor- tance of avoiding security vacuums. Ensuring that decisions on both the structures estab- lished to house the demobilization process and the return of demobilised ex-combatants are taken in parallel with complementary community law enforcement activities can miti- gate this concern. The security implications of cross-border flows of ex-combatants also highlight the positive relationship between demobilization and border security.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187651,9 +187651,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2968, - "Paragraph": "Demobilization \\n While often treated narrowly as a feature of DDR, demobilization can also be conceived within an SSR framework more generally. Where decisions affecting force size and structure provide for inefficient, unaffordable or abusive security structures this will undermine long term peace and security. Decisions should therefore be based on a rational, inclusive assess- ment by national actors of the objectives, role and values of the future security sector. One important element of the relationship between demobilization and SSR relates to the impor- tance of avoiding security vacuums. Ensuring that decisions on both the structures estab- lished to house the demobilization process and the return of demobilised ex-combatants are taken in parallel with complementary community law enforcement activities can miti- gate this concern. The security implications of cross-border flows of ex-combatants also highlight the positive relationship between demobilization and border security.", + "Paragraph": "Demobilization \n While often treated narrowly as a feature of DDR, demobilization can also be conceived within an SSR framework more generally. Where decisions affecting force size and structure provide for inefficient, unaffordable or abusive security structures this will undermine long term peace and security. Decisions should therefore be based on a rational, inclusive assess- ment by national actors of the objectives, role and values of the future security sector. One important element of the relationship between demobilization and SSR relates to the impor- tance of avoiding security vacuums. Ensuring that decisions on both the structures estab- lished to house the demobilization process and the return of demobilised ex-combatants are taken in parallel with complementary community law enforcement activities can miti- gate this concern. The security implications of cross-border flows of ex-combatants also highlight the positive relationship between demobilization and border security.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187669,9 +187669,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2968, - "Paragraph": "Demobilization \\n While often treated narrowly as a feature of DDR, demobilization can also be conceived within an SSR framework more generally. Where decisions affecting force size and structure provide for inefficient, unaffordable or abusive security structures this will undermine long term peace and security. Decisions should therefore be based on a rational, inclusive assess- ment by national actors of the objectives, role and values of the future security sector. One important element of the relationship between demobilization and SSR relates to the impor- tance of avoiding security vacuums. Ensuring that decisions on both the structures estab- lished to house the demobilization process and the return of demobilised ex-combatants are taken in parallel with complementary community law enforcement activities can miti- gate this concern. The security implications of cross-border flows of ex-combatants also highlight the positive relationship between demobilization and border security.", + "Paragraph": "Demobilization \n While often treated narrowly as a feature of DDR, demobilization can also be conceived within an SSR framework more generally. Where decisions affecting force size and structure provide for inefficient, unaffordable or abusive security structures this will undermine long term peace and security. Decisions should therefore be based on a rational, inclusive assess- ment by national actors of the objectives, role and values of the future security sector. One important element of the relationship between demobilization and SSR relates to the impor- tance of avoiding security vacuums. Ensuring that decisions on both the structures estab- lished to house the demobilization process and the return of demobilised ex-combatants are taken in parallel with complementary community law enforcement activities can miti- gate this concern. The security implications of cross-border flows of ex-combatants also highlight the positive relationship between demobilization and border security.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187687,9 +187687,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2968, - "Paragraph": "Demobilization \\n While often treated narrowly as a feature of DDR, demobilization can also be conceived within an SSR framework more generally. Where decisions affecting force size and structure provide for inefficient, unaffordable or abusive security structures this will undermine long term peace and security. Decisions should therefore be based on a rational, inclusive assess- ment by national actors of the objectives, role and values of the future security sector. One important element of the relationship between demobilization and SSR relates to the impor- tance of avoiding security vacuums. Ensuring that decisions on both the structures estab- lished to house the demobilization process and the return of demobilised ex-combatants are taken in parallel with complementary community law enforcement activities can miti- gate this concern. The security implications of cross-border flows of ex-combatants also highlight the positive relationship between demobilization and border security.", + "Paragraph": "Demobilization \n While often treated narrowly as a feature of DDR, demobilization can also be conceived within an SSR framework more generally. Where decisions affecting force size and structure provide for inefficient, unaffordable or abusive security structures this will undermine long term peace and security. Decisions should therefore be based on a rational, inclusive assess- ment by national actors of the objectives, role and values of the future security sector. One important element of the relationship between demobilization and SSR relates to the impor- tance of avoiding security vacuums. Ensuring that decisions on both the structures estab- lished to house the demobilization process and the return of demobilised ex-combatants are taken in parallel with complementary community law enforcement activities can miti- gate this concern. The security implications of cross-border flows of ex-combatants also highlight the positive relationship between demobilization and border security.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187705,9 +187705,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2968, - "Paragraph": "Demobilization \\n While often treated narrowly as a feature of DDR, demobilization can also be conceived within an SSR framework more generally. Where decisions affecting force size and structure provide for inefficient, unaffordable or abusive security structures this will undermine long term peace and security. Decisions should therefore be based on a rational, inclusive assess- ment by national actors of the objectives, role and values of the future security sector. One important element of the relationship between demobilization and SSR relates to the impor- tance of avoiding security vacuums. Ensuring that decisions on both the structures estab- lished to house the demobilization process and the return of demobilised ex-combatants are taken in parallel with complementary community law enforcement activities can miti- gate this concern. The security implications of cross-border flows of ex-combatants also highlight the positive relationship between demobilization and border security.", + "Paragraph": "Demobilization \n While often treated narrowly as a feature of DDR, demobilization can also be conceived within an SSR framework more generally. Where decisions affecting force size and structure provide for inefficient, unaffordable or abusive security structures this will undermine long term peace and security. Decisions should therefore be based on a rational, inclusive assess- ment by national actors of the objectives, role and values of the future security sector. One important element of the relationship between demobilization and SSR relates to the impor- tance of avoiding security vacuums. Ensuring that decisions on both the structures estab- lished to house the demobilization process and the return of demobilised ex-combatants are taken in parallel with complementary community law enforcement activities can miti- gate this concern. The security implications of cross-border flows of ex-combatants also highlight the positive relationship between demobilization and border security.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187723,9 +187723,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2969, - "Paragraph": "Reintegration \\n Successful reintegration fulfils a common DDR\/SSR goal of ensuring a well-managed tran- sition of former combatants to civilian life while taking into account the needs of receiving communities. By contrast, failed reintegration can undermine SSR efforts by placing exces- sive pressures on police, courts and prisons while harming the security of the state and its citizens. Speed of response and adequate financial support are important since a delayed or underfunded reintegration process may skew options for SSR and limit flexibility. Ex- combatants may find employment in different parts of the formal or informal security sector. In such cases, clear criteria should be established to ensure that individuals with inappropriate backgrounds or training are not re-deployed within the security sector, weakening the effectiveness and legitimacy of relevant bodies. Appropriate re-training of personnel and processes that support vetting within reformed security institutions are therefore two examples where DDR and SSR efforts intersect.", + "Paragraph": "Reintegration \n Successful reintegration fulfils a common DDR\/SSR goal of ensuring a well-managed tran- sition of former combatants to civilian life while taking into account the needs of receiving communities. By contrast, failed reintegration can undermine SSR efforts by placing exces- sive pressures on police, courts and prisons while harming the security of the state and its citizens. Speed of response and adequate financial support are important since a delayed or underfunded reintegration process may skew options for SSR and limit flexibility. Ex- combatants may find employment in different parts of the formal or informal security sector. In such cases, clear criteria should be established to ensure that individuals with inappropriate backgrounds or training are not re-deployed within the security sector, weakening the effectiveness and legitimacy of relevant bodies. Appropriate re-training of personnel and processes that support vetting within reformed security institutions are therefore two examples where DDR and SSR efforts intersect.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187734,16 +187734,16 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Reintegration \\n Successful reintegration fulfils a common DDR\/SSR goal of ensuring a well-managed tran- sition of former combatants to civilian life while taking into account the needs of receiving communities.", + "Sentence": "Reintegration \n Successful reintegration fulfils a common DDR\/SSR goal of ensuring a well-managed tran- sition of former combatants to civilian life while taking into account the needs of receiving communities.", "newParagraph": "reintegration n successful reintegration fulfils common ddrssr goal ensuring wellmanaged tran sition former combatant civilian life taking account need receiving community contrast failed reintegration undermine ssr effort placing exces sive pressure police court prison harming security state citizen speed response adequate financial support important since delayed underfunded reintegration process may skew option ssr limit flexibility ex combatant may find employment different part formal informal security sector case clear criterion established ensure individual inappropriate background training redeployed within security sector weakening effectiveness legitimacy relevant body appropriate retraining personnel process support vetting within reformed security institution therefore two example ddr ssr effort intersect", "ProcessedSent": "reintegration n successful reintegration fulfils common ddrssr goal ensuring wellmanaged tran sition former combatant civilian life taking account need receiving community", "SentID": 10429 }, { "ParagraphID": 2969, - "Paragraph": "Reintegration \\n Successful reintegration fulfils a common DDR\/SSR goal of ensuring a well-managed tran- sition of former combatants to civilian life while taking into account the needs of receiving communities. By contrast, failed reintegration can undermine SSR efforts by placing exces- sive pressures on police, courts and prisons while harming the security of the state and its citizens. Speed of response and adequate financial support are important since a delayed or underfunded reintegration process may skew options for SSR and limit flexibility. Ex- combatants may find employment in different parts of the formal or informal security sector. In such cases, clear criteria should be established to ensure that individuals with inappropriate backgrounds or training are not re-deployed within the security sector, weakening the effectiveness and legitimacy of relevant bodies. Appropriate re-training of personnel and processes that support vetting within reformed security institutions are therefore two examples where DDR and SSR efforts intersect.", + "Paragraph": "Reintegration \n Successful reintegration fulfils a common DDR\/SSR goal of ensuring a well-managed tran- sition of former combatants to civilian life while taking into account the needs of receiving communities. By contrast, failed reintegration can undermine SSR efforts by placing exces- sive pressures on police, courts and prisons while harming the security of the state and its citizens. Speed of response and adequate financial support are important since a delayed or underfunded reintegration process may skew options for SSR and limit flexibility. Ex- combatants may find employment in different parts of the formal or informal security sector. In such cases, clear criteria should be established to ensure that individuals with inappropriate backgrounds or training are not re-deployed within the security sector, weakening the effectiveness and legitimacy of relevant bodies. Appropriate re-training of personnel and processes that support vetting within reformed security institutions are therefore two examples where DDR and SSR efforts intersect.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187759,9 +187759,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2969, - "Paragraph": "Reintegration \\n Successful reintegration fulfils a common DDR\/SSR goal of ensuring a well-managed tran- sition of former combatants to civilian life while taking into account the needs of receiving communities. By contrast, failed reintegration can undermine SSR efforts by placing exces- sive pressures on police, courts and prisons while harming the security of the state and its citizens. Speed of response and adequate financial support are important since a delayed or underfunded reintegration process may skew options for SSR and limit flexibility. Ex- combatants may find employment in different parts of the formal or informal security sector. In such cases, clear criteria should be established to ensure that individuals with inappropriate backgrounds or training are not re-deployed within the security sector, weakening the effectiveness and legitimacy of relevant bodies. Appropriate re-training of personnel and processes that support vetting within reformed security institutions are therefore two examples where DDR and SSR efforts intersect.", + "Paragraph": "Reintegration \n Successful reintegration fulfils a common DDR\/SSR goal of ensuring a well-managed tran- sition of former combatants to civilian life while taking into account the needs of receiving communities. By contrast, failed reintegration can undermine SSR efforts by placing exces- sive pressures on police, courts and prisons while harming the security of the state and its citizens. Speed of response and adequate financial support are important since a delayed or underfunded reintegration process may skew options for SSR and limit flexibility. Ex- combatants may find employment in different parts of the formal or informal security sector. In such cases, clear criteria should be established to ensure that individuals with inappropriate backgrounds or training are not re-deployed within the security sector, weakening the effectiveness and legitimacy of relevant bodies. Appropriate re-training of personnel and processes that support vetting within reformed security institutions are therefore two examples where DDR and SSR efforts intersect.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187777,9 +187777,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2969, - "Paragraph": "Reintegration \\n Successful reintegration fulfils a common DDR\/SSR goal of ensuring a well-managed tran- sition of former combatants to civilian life while taking into account the needs of receiving communities. By contrast, failed reintegration can undermine SSR efforts by placing exces- sive pressures on police, courts and prisons while harming the security of the state and its citizens. Speed of response and adequate financial support are important since a delayed or underfunded reintegration process may skew options for SSR and limit flexibility. Ex- combatants may find employment in different parts of the formal or informal security sector. In such cases, clear criteria should be established to ensure that individuals with inappropriate backgrounds or training are not re-deployed within the security sector, weakening the effectiveness and legitimacy of relevant bodies. Appropriate re-training of personnel and processes that support vetting within reformed security institutions are therefore two examples where DDR and SSR efforts intersect.", + "Paragraph": "Reintegration \n Successful reintegration fulfils a common DDR\/SSR goal of ensuring a well-managed tran- sition of former combatants to civilian life while taking into account the needs of receiving communities. By contrast, failed reintegration can undermine SSR efforts by placing exces- sive pressures on police, courts and prisons while harming the security of the state and its citizens. Speed of response and adequate financial support are important since a delayed or underfunded reintegration process may skew options for SSR and limit flexibility. Ex- combatants may find employment in different parts of the formal or informal security sector. In such cases, clear criteria should be established to ensure that individuals with inappropriate backgrounds or training are not re-deployed within the security sector, weakening the effectiveness and legitimacy of relevant bodies. Appropriate re-training of personnel and processes that support vetting within reformed security institutions are therefore two examples where DDR and SSR efforts intersect.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187795,9 +187795,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2969, - "Paragraph": "Reintegration \\n Successful reintegration fulfils a common DDR\/SSR goal of ensuring a well-managed tran- sition of former combatants to civilian life while taking into account the needs of receiving communities. By contrast, failed reintegration can undermine SSR efforts by placing exces- sive pressures on police, courts and prisons while harming the security of the state and its citizens. Speed of response and adequate financial support are important since a delayed or underfunded reintegration process may skew options for SSR and limit flexibility. Ex- combatants may find employment in different parts of the formal or informal security sector. In such cases, clear criteria should be established to ensure that individuals with inappropriate backgrounds or training are not re-deployed within the security sector, weakening the effectiveness and legitimacy of relevant bodies. Appropriate re-training of personnel and processes that support vetting within reformed security institutions are therefore two examples where DDR and SSR efforts intersect.", + "Paragraph": "Reintegration \n Successful reintegration fulfils a common DDR\/SSR goal of ensuring a well-managed tran- sition of former combatants to civilian life while taking into account the needs of receiving communities. By contrast, failed reintegration can undermine SSR efforts by placing exces- sive pressures on police, courts and prisons while harming the security of the state and its citizens. Speed of response and adequate financial support are important since a delayed or underfunded reintegration process may skew options for SSR and limit flexibility. Ex- combatants may find employment in different parts of the formal or informal security sector. In such cases, clear criteria should be established to ensure that individuals with inappropriate backgrounds or training are not re-deployed within the security sector, weakening the effectiveness and legitimacy of relevant bodies. Appropriate re-training of personnel and processes that support vetting within reformed security institutions are therefore two examples where DDR and SSR efforts intersect.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187813,9 +187813,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2969, - "Paragraph": "Reintegration \\n Successful reintegration fulfils a common DDR\/SSR goal of ensuring a well-managed tran- sition of former combatants to civilian life while taking into account the needs of receiving communities. By contrast, failed reintegration can undermine SSR efforts by placing exces- sive pressures on police, courts and prisons while harming the security of the state and its citizens. Speed of response and adequate financial support are important since a delayed or underfunded reintegration process may skew options for SSR and limit flexibility. Ex- combatants may find employment in different parts of the formal or informal security sector. In such cases, clear criteria should be established to ensure that individuals with inappropriate backgrounds or training are not re-deployed within the security sector, weakening the effectiveness and legitimacy of relevant bodies. Appropriate re-training of personnel and processes that support vetting within reformed security institutions are therefore two examples where DDR and SSR efforts intersect.", + "Paragraph": "Reintegration \n Successful reintegration fulfils a common DDR\/SSR goal of ensuring a well-managed tran- sition of former combatants to civilian life while taking into account the needs of receiving communities. By contrast, failed reintegration can undermine SSR efforts by placing exces- sive pressures on police, courts and prisons while harming the security of the state and its citizens. Speed of response and adequate financial support are important since a delayed or underfunded reintegration process may skew options for SSR and limit flexibility. Ex- combatants may find employment in different parts of the formal or informal security sector. In such cases, clear criteria should be established to ensure that individuals with inappropriate backgrounds or training are not re-deployed within the security sector, weakening the effectiveness and legitimacy of relevant bodies. Appropriate re-training of personnel and processes that support vetting within reformed security institutions are therefore two examples where DDR and SSR efforts intersect.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187833,7 +187833,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2970, "Paragraph": "The overarching principles for a comprehensive and coherent UN approach to DDR stress the need to be people-centred, flexible, transparent and accountable, nationally owned, integrated and well-planned. In the absence of a specific UN doctrine,10 the Secretary- General\u2019s Report on SSR is a significant departure because it provides a clear statement of the UN\u2019s general understanding of and approach to SSR. It is important that there is comple- mentarity between the two: shared principles provide a common basis in order to develop an integrated UN approach to DDR and SSR. This section reviews these shared principles in order to underline key elements that can support the development of synergies.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187851,7 +187851,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2970, "Paragraph": "The overarching principles for a comprehensive and coherent UN approach to DDR stress the need to be people-centred, flexible, transparent and accountable, nationally owned, integrated and well-planned. In the absence of a specific UN doctrine,10 the Secretary- General\u2019s Report on SSR is a significant departure because it provides a clear statement of the UN\u2019s general understanding of and approach to SSR. It is important that there is comple- mentarity between the two: shared principles provide a common basis in order to develop an integrated UN approach to DDR and SSR. This section reviews these shared principles in order to underline key elements that can support the development of synergies.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187869,7 +187869,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2970, "Paragraph": "The overarching principles for a comprehensive and coherent UN approach to DDR stress the need to be people-centred, flexible, transparent and accountable, nationally owned, integrated and well-planned. In the absence of a specific UN doctrine,10 the Secretary- General\u2019s Report on SSR is a significant departure because it provides a clear statement of the UN\u2019s general understanding of and approach to SSR. It is important that there is comple- mentarity between the two: shared principles provide a common basis in order to develop an integrated UN approach to DDR and SSR. This section reviews these shared principles in order to underline key elements that can support the development of synergies.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187887,7 +187887,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2970, "Paragraph": "The overarching principles for a comprehensive and coherent UN approach to DDR stress the need to be people-centred, flexible, transparent and accountable, nationally owned, integrated and well-planned. In the absence of a specific UN doctrine,10 the Secretary- General\u2019s Report on SSR is a significant departure because it provides a clear statement of the UN\u2019s general understanding of and approach to SSR. It is important that there is comple- mentarity between the two: shared principles provide a common basis in order to develop an integrated UN approach to DDR and SSR. This section reviews these shared principles in order to underline key elements that can support the development of synergies.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187905,7 +187905,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2971, "Paragraph": "While a given DDR programme might generate important returns in terms of performance indicators (e.g. numbers of weapons collected and ex-combatants reintegrated) this may not translate into effective outcomes (e.g. improvements in real and perceived individual or community security). Involving communities and local authorities in planning, implement- ing and monitoring interventions can potentially integrate efforts such as the community reintegration of former combatants with the provision of security at the local level in order to ensure that reintegration and SSR are complementary. Supporting the capacity of national armed and other security forces and line ministries can build morale, demonstrating a \u2018duty of care\u2019 through fair treatment.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187923,7 +187923,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2971, "Paragraph": "While a given DDR programme might generate important returns in terms of performance indicators (e.g. numbers of weapons collected and ex-combatants reintegrated) this may not translate into effective outcomes (e.g. improvements in real and perceived individual or community security). Involving communities and local authorities in planning, implement- ing and monitoring interventions can potentially integrate efforts such as the community reintegration of former combatants with the provision of security at the local level in order to ensure that reintegration and SSR are complementary. Supporting the capacity of national armed and other security forces and line ministries can build morale, demonstrating a \u2018duty of care\u2019 through fair treatment.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187941,7 +187941,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2971, "Paragraph": "While a given DDR programme might generate important returns in terms of performance indicators (e.g. numbers of weapons collected and ex-combatants reintegrated) this may not translate into effective outcomes (e.g. improvements in real and perceived individual or community security). Involving communities and local authorities in planning, implement- ing and monitoring interventions can potentially integrate efforts such as the community reintegration of former combatants with the provision of security at the local level in order to ensure that reintegration and SSR are complementary. Supporting the capacity of national armed and other security forces and line ministries can build morale, demonstrating a \u2018duty of care\u2019 through fair treatment.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187959,7 +187959,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2971, "Paragraph": "While a given DDR programme might generate important returns in terms of performance indicators (e.g. numbers of weapons collected and ex-combatants reintegrated) this may not translate into effective outcomes (e.g. improvements in real and perceived individual or community security). Involving communities and local authorities in planning, implement- ing and monitoring interventions can potentially integrate efforts such as the community reintegration of former combatants with the provision of security at the local level in order to ensure that reintegration and SSR are complementary. Supporting the capacity of national armed and other security forces and line ministries can build morale, demonstrating a \u2018duty of care\u2019 through fair treatment.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187977,7 +187977,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2971, "Paragraph": "While a given DDR programme might generate important returns in terms of performance indicators (e.g. numbers of weapons collected and ex-combatants reintegrated) this may not translate into effective outcomes (e.g. improvements in real and perceived individual or community security). Involving communities and local authorities in planning, implement- ing and monitoring interventions can potentially integrate efforts such as the community reintegration of former combatants with the provision of security at the local level in order to ensure that reintegration and SSR are complementary. Supporting the capacity of national armed and other security forces and line ministries can build morale, demonstrating a \u2018duty of care\u2019 through fair treatment.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -187995,7 +187995,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2972, "Paragraph": "DDR and SSR interventions need to be flexible and responsive to changing conditions on the ground. Policy guidance must build in the need to understand contextual factors and adjust to changing realities. Mapping relevant actors and understanding the opportunities and constraints posed by specific political, security and socio-economic factors are common requirements for DDR and SSR. Addressing these issues in assessments, ensuring that such knowledge informs both mediation support and negotiating processes, integrating it into the design of DDR and SSR programmes will help to ensure a common appreciation of what is realistic in a given context. Regular monitoring and evaluation should inform the sequencing of activities while avoiding inappropriate or insensitive approaches.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188013,7 +188013,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2972, "Paragraph": "DDR and SSR interventions need to be flexible and responsive to changing conditions on the ground. Policy guidance must build in the need to understand contextual factors and adjust to changing realities. Mapping relevant actors and understanding the opportunities and constraints posed by specific political, security and socio-economic factors are common requirements for DDR and SSR. Addressing these issues in assessments, ensuring that such knowledge informs both mediation support and negotiating processes, integrating it into the design of DDR and SSR programmes will help to ensure a common appreciation of what is realistic in a given context. Regular monitoring and evaluation should inform the sequencing of activities while avoiding inappropriate or insensitive approaches.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188031,7 +188031,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2972, "Paragraph": "DDR and SSR interventions need to be flexible and responsive to changing conditions on the ground. Policy guidance must build in the need to understand contextual factors and adjust to changing realities. Mapping relevant actors and understanding the opportunities and constraints posed by specific political, security and socio-economic factors are common requirements for DDR and SSR. Addressing these issues in assessments, ensuring that such knowledge informs both mediation support and negotiating processes, integrating it into the design of DDR and SSR programmes will help to ensure a common appreciation of what is realistic in a given context. Regular monitoring and evaluation should inform the sequencing of activities while avoiding inappropriate or insensitive approaches.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188049,7 +188049,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2972, "Paragraph": "DDR and SSR interventions need to be flexible and responsive to changing conditions on the ground. Policy guidance must build in the need to understand contextual factors and adjust to changing realities. Mapping relevant actors and understanding the opportunities and constraints posed by specific political, security and socio-economic factors are common requirements for DDR and SSR. Addressing these issues in assessments, ensuring that such knowledge informs both mediation support and negotiating processes, integrating it into the design of DDR and SSR programmes will help to ensure a common appreciation of what is realistic in a given context. Regular monitoring and evaluation should inform the sequencing of activities while avoiding inappropriate or insensitive approaches.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188067,7 +188067,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2972, "Paragraph": "DDR and SSR interventions need to be flexible and responsive to changing conditions on the ground. Policy guidance must build in the need to understand contextual factors and adjust to changing realities. Mapping relevant actors and understanding the opportunities and constraints posed by specific political, security and socio-economic factors are common requirements for DDR and SSR. Addressing these issues in assessments, ensuring that such knowledge informs both mediation support and negotiating processes, integrating it into the design of DDR and SSR programmes will help to ensure a common appreciation of what is realistic in a given context. Regular monitoring and evaluation should inform the sequencing of activities while avoiding inappropriate or insensitive approaches.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188085,7 +188085,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2973, "Paragraph": "DDR and SSR conceived narrowly as technical support for military or other security bodies may fail to take sufficient account of the dynamic political environment within which these actors are situated. Emphasising the need to build or enhance the respective roles of the executive, legislative, judiciary as well as civil society will help to ensure that programmes are realistic, transparent and widely understood. Developing a nationally-driven picture of security needs in order to determine the scope and objectives of DDR is a lengthy and challenging process that may be too sensitive to address in the early post-conflict period. Avoiding rigid prescriptions is therefore important while identifying and applying mini- mum standards that should be non-negotiable.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188103,7 +188103,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2973, "Paragraph": "DDR and SSR conceived narrowly as technical support for military or other security bodies may fail to take sufficient account of the dynamic political environment within which these actors are situated. Emphasising the need to build or enhance the respective roles of the executive, legislative, judiciary as well as civil society will help to ensure that programmes are realistic, transparent and widely understood. Developing a nationally-driven picture of security needs in order to determine the scope and objectives of DDR is a lengthy and challenging process that may be too sensitive to address in the early post-conflict period. Avoiding rigid prescriptions is therefore important while identifying and applying mini- mum standards that should be non-negotiable.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188121,7 +188121,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2973, "Paragraph": "DDR and SSR conceived narrowly as technical support for military or other security bodies may fail to take sufficient account of the dynamic political environment within which these actors are situated. Emphasising the need to build or enhance the respective roles of the executive, legislative, judiciary as well as civil society will help to ensure that programmes are realistic, transparent and widely understood. Developing a nationally-driven picture of security needs in order to determine the scope and objectives of DDR is a lengthy and challenging process that may be too sensitive to address in the early post-conflict period. Avoiding rigid prescriptions is therefore important while identifying and applying mini- mum standards that should be non-negotiable.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188139,7 +188139,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2973, "Paragraph": "DDR and SSR conceived narrowly as technical support for military or other security bodies may fail to take sufficient account of the dynamic political environment within which these actors are situated. Emphasising the need to build or enhance the respective roles of the executive, legislative, judiciary as well as civil society will help to ensure that programmes are realistic, transparent and widely understood. Developing a nationally-driven picture of security needs in order to determine the scope and objectives of DDR is a lengthy and challenging process that may be too sensitive to address in the early post-conflict period. Avoiding rigid prescriptions is therefore important while identifying and applying mini- mum standards that should be non-negotiable.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188157,7 +188157,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2974, "Paragraph": "National ownership is a much broader concept than \u2018state\u2019 ownership and includes both state and non-state actors at national, regional and local levels. Seeking to involve as many former conflict parties as possible as well as groups that have been marginalised, or are generally under-represented on issues of security in DDR and SSR decision-making is particularly important. This contributes to ensuring that different segments of society feel part of this process. Participatory approaches provide a means to work through the conflict- ing interests of different domestic constituencies. Enhancing the capacity of national and regional authorities to manage, implement and oversee these programmes provides a cru- cial bridge from post-conflict stabilisation to longer term recovery and development by supporting the creation of skills that will remain once international support has been drawn down.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188175,7 +188175,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2974, "Paragraph": "National ownership is a much broader concept than \u2018state\u2019 ownership and includes both state and non-state actors at national, regional and local levels. Seeking to involve as many former conflict parties as possible as well as groups that have been marginalised, or are generally under-represented on issues of security in DDR and SSR decision-making is particularly important. This contributes to ensuring that different segments of society feel part of this process. Participatory approaches provide a means to work through the conflict- ing interests of different domestic constituencies. Enhancing the capacity of national and regional authorities to manage, implement and oversee these programmes provides a cru- cial bridge from post-conflict stabilisation to longer term recovery and development by supporting the creation of skills that will remain once international support has been drawn down.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188193,7 +188193,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2974, "Paragraph": "National ownership is a much broader concept than \u2018state\u2019 ownership and includes both state and non-state actors at national, regional and local levels. Seeking to involve as many former conflict parties as possible as well as groups that have been marginalised, or are generally under-represented on issues of security in DDR and SSR decision-making is particularly important. This contributes to ensuring that different segments of society feel part of this process. Participatory approaches provide a means to work through the conflict- ing interests of different domestic constituencies. Enhancing the capacity of national and regional authorities to manage, implement and oversee these programmes provides a cru- cial bridge from post-conflict stabilisation to longer term recovery and development by supporting the creation of skills that will remain once international support has been drawn down.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188211,7 +188211,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2974, "Paragraph": "National ownership is a much broader concept than \u2018state\u2019 ownership and includes both state and non-state actors at national, regional and local levels. Seeking to involve as many former conflict parties as possible as well as groups that have been marginalised, or are generally under-represented on issues of security in DDR and SSR decision-making is particularly important. This contributes to ensuring that different segments of society feel part of this process. Participatory approaches provide a means to work through the conflict- ing interests of different domestic constituencies. Enhancing the capacity of national and regional authorities to manage, implement and oversee these programmes provides a cru- cial bridge from post-conflict stabilisation to longer term recovery and development by supporting the creation of skills that will remain once international support has been drawn down.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188229,7 +188229,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2974, "Paragraph": "National ownership is a much broader concept than \u2018state\u2019 ownership and includes both state and non-state actors at national, regional and local levels. Seeking to involve as many former conflict parties as possible as well as groups that have been marginalised, or are generally under-represented on issues of security in DDR and SSR decision-making is particularly important. This contributes to ensuring that different segments of society feel part of this process. Participatory approaches provide a means to work through the conflict- ing interests of different domestic constituencies. Enhancing the capacity of national and regional authorities to manage, implement and oversee these programmes provides a cru- cial bridge from post-conflict stabilisation to longer term recovery and development by supporting the creation of skills that will remain once international support has been drawn down.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188247,7 +188247,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2975, "Paragraph": "The range of objectives and actors involved in DDR and SSR place particular emphasis on coordination issues. Failures to align activities may result in incoherent and potentially destructive outcomes. It is important to coordinate DDR and SSR and relate them to other post-conflict peacebuilding activities such as small arms and light weapons (SALW), transi- tional justice or mine action programmes. Due attention to context-specific issues of timing and sequencing is essential to ensure that the different activities do not become incompat- ible. The absence of adequate, timely and well-targeted funding provides a particularly acute challenge to sustainable, coherent DDR and SSR.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188265,7 +188265,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2975, "Paragraph": "The range of objectives and actors involved in DDR and SSR place particular emphasis on coordination issues. Failures to align activities may result in incoherent and potentially destructive outcomes. It is important to coordinate DDR and SSR and relate them to other post-conflict peacebuilding activities such as small arms and light weapons (SALW), transi- tional justice or mine action programmes. Due attention to context-specific issues of timing and sequencing is essential to ensure that the different activities do not become incompat- ible. The absence of adequate, timely and well-targeted funding provides a particularly acute challenge to sustainable, coherent DDR and SSR.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188283,7 +188283,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2975, "Paragraph": "The range of objectives and actors involved in DDR and SSR place particular emphasis on coordination issues. Failures to align activities may result in incoherent and potentially destructive outcomes. It is important to coordinate DDR and SSR and relate them to other post-conflict peacebuilding activities such as small arms and light weapons (SALW), transi- tional justice or mine action programmes. Due attention to context-specific issues of timing and sequencing is essential to ensure that the different activities do not become incompat- ible. The absence of adequate, timely and well-targeted funding provides a particularly acute challenge to sustainable, coherent DDR and SSR.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188301,7 +188301,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2975, "Paragraph": "The range of objectives and actors involved in DDR and SSR place particular emphasis on coordination issues. Failures to align activities may result in incoherent and potentially destructive outcomes. It is important to coordinate DDR and SSR and relate them to other post-conflict peacebuilding activities such as small arms and light weapons (SALW), transi- tional justice or mine action programmes. Due attention to context-specific issues of timing and sequencing is essential to ensure that the different activities do not become incompat- ible. The absence of adequate, timely and well-targeted funding provides a particularly acute challenge to sustainable, coherent DDR and SSR.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188319,7 +188319,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2975, "Paragraph": "The range of objectives and actors involved in DDR and SSR place particular emphasis on coordination issues. Failures to align activities may result in incoherent and potentially destructive outcomes. It is important to coordinate DDR and SSR and relate them to other post-conflict peacebuilding activities such as small arms and light weapons (SALW), transi- tional justice or mine action programmes. Due attention to context-specific issues of timing and sequencing is essential to ensure that the different activities do not become incompat- ible. The absence of adequate, timely and well-targeted funding provides a particularly acute challenge to sustainable, coherent DDR and SSR.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188337,7 +188337,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2976, "Paragraph": "This section begins by identifying certain early areas of SSR support that can reinforce DDR activities (7.1-7.4) while preparing the ground for a more programmatic approach to SSR. An important element of the DDR-SSR nexus is the integration of ex-combatants into the reformed security sector. Particular emphasis is therefore put on issues relating to secu- rity sector integration (7.5-7.12).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188355,7 +188355,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2976, "Paragraph": "This section begins by identifying certain early areas of SSR support that can reinforce DDR activities (7.1-7.4) while preparing the ground for a more programmatic approach to SSR. An important element of the DDR-SSR nexus is the integration of ex-combatants into the reformed security sector. Particular emphasis is therefore put on issues relating to secu- rity sector integration (7.5-7.12).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188373,7 +188373,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2976, "Paragraph": "This section begins by identifying certain early areas of SSR support that can reinforce DDR activities (7.1-7.4) while preparing the ground for a more programmatic approach to SSR. An important element of the DDR-SSR nexus is the integration of ex-combatants into the reformed security sector. Particular emphasis is therefore put on issues relating to secu- rity sector integration (7.5-7.12).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188391,7 +188391,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2977, "Paragraph": "Reducing the availability of illegal weapons connects DDR and SSR to related security challenges such as wider civilian arms availability. In particular, there is a danger of \u2018leak- age\u2019 during transportation of weapons and ammunition gathered through disarmament processes or as a result of inadequately managed and controlled storage facilities. Failing to recognise these links may represent a missed opportunity to develop the awareness and capacity of the security sector to address security concerns related to the collection and management of weapon stocks (see IDDRS 2.20 on post-conflict stabilization, peace-building and recovery frameworks).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188409,7 +188409,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2977, "Paragraph": "Reducing the availability of illegal weapons connects DDR and SSR to related security challenges such as wider civilian arms availability. In particular, there is a danger of \u2018leak- age\u2019 during transportation of weapons and ammunition gathered through disarmament processes or as a result of inadequately managed and controlled storage facilities. Failing to recognise these links may represent a missed opportunity to develop the awareness and capacity of the security sector to address security concerns related to the collection and management of weapon stocks (see IDDRS 2.20 on post-conflict stabilization, peace-building and recovery frameworks).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188427,7 +188427,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2977, "Paragraph": "Reducing the availability of illegal weapons connects DDR and SSR to related security challenges such as wider civilian arms availability. In particular, there is a danger of \u2018leak- age\u2019 during transportation of weapons and ammunition gathered through disarmament processes or as a result of inadequately managed and controlled storage facilities. Failing to recognise these links may represent a missed opportunity to develop the awareness and capacity of the security sector to address security concerns related to the collection and management of weapon stocks (see IDDRS 2.20 on post-conflict stabilization, peace-building and recovery frameworks).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188445,7 +188445,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2978, "Paragraph": "Disarmament programmes should be complemented, where appropriate, by training and other activities to enhance law enforcement capacities and national control over weap- ons and ammunition stocks. The collection of arms through the disarmament component of the DDR programme may in certain cases provide an important source of weapons for reformed security forces. In such cases, disarmament may be considered a potential entry point for coordination between DDR and SSR.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188463,7 +188463,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2978, "Paragraph": "Disarmament programmes should be complemented, where appropriate, by training and other activities to enhance law enforcement capacities and national control over weap- ons and ammunition stocks. The collection of arms through the disarmament component of the DDR programme may in certain cases provide an important source of weapons for reformed security forces. In such cases, disarmament may be considered a potential entry point for coordination between DDR and SSR.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188481,7 +188481,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2978, "Paragraph": "Disarmament programmes should be complemented, where appropriate, by training and other activities to enhance law enforcement capacities and national control over weap- ons and ammunition stocks. The collection of arms through the disarmament component of the DDR programme may in certain cases provide an important source of weapons for reformed security forces. In such cases, disarmament may be considered a potential entry point for coordination between DDR and SSR.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188499,7 +188499,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2979, "Paragraph": "In cases where combatants are declared part of illegal groups, progress in police reform and relevant judicial functions can project deterrence and help ensure compliance with the DDR process. This role must be based on adequate police capacity to play such a supporting role (see Case Study Box 1).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188517,7 +188517,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2979, "Paragraph": "In cases where combatants are declared part of illegal groups, progress in police reform and relevant judicial functions can project deterrence and help ensure compliance with the DDR process. This role must be based on adequate police capacity to play such a supporting role (see Case Study Box 1).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188535,7 +188535,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2980, "Paragraph": "The role of the police in supporting DDR activities should be an element of joint plan- ning. In particular, decisions on police support to DDR should be based on their capacity to support the DDR programme. Where there are synergies to be realised, this should be reflected in resource allocation, training and priority setting for police reform activities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188553,7 +188553,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2980, "Paragraph": "The role of the police in supporting DDR activities should be an element of joint plan- ning. In particular, decisions on police support to DDR should be based on their capacity to support the DDR programme. Where there are synergies to be realised, this should be reflected in resource allocation, training and priority setting for police reform activities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188571,7 +188571,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2980, "Paragraph": "The role of the police in supporting DDR activities should be an element of joint plan- ning. In particular, decisions on police support to DDR should be based on their capacity to support the DDR programme. Where there are synergies to be realised, this should be reflected in resource allocation, training and priority setting for police reform activities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188589,7 +188589,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2981, "Paragraph": "A number of common DDR\/SSR concerns relate to the disengagement of ex-combatants. Rebel groups often inflate their numbers before or at the start of a DDR process due to financial incentives as well as to strengthen their negotiating position for terms of entry into the security sector. This practice can result in forced recruitment of individuals, including children, to increase the headcount. Security vacuums may be one further consequence of a disengagement process with the movement of ex-combatants to de- mobilization centres resulting in potential risks to communities. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188607,7 +188607,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2981, "Paragraph": "A number of common DDR\/SSR concerns relate to the disengagement of ex-combatants. Rebel groups often inflate their numbers before or at the start of a DDR process due to financial incentives as well as to strengthen their negotiating position for terms of entry into the security sector. This practice can result in forced recruitment of individuals, including children, to increase the headcount. Security vacuums may be one further consequence of a disengagement process with the movement of ex-combatants to de- mobilization centres resulting in potential risks to communities. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188625,7 +188625,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2981, "Paragraph": "A number of common DDR\/SSR concerns relate to the disengagement of ex-combatants. Rebel groups often inflate their numbers before or at the start of a DDR process due to financial incentives as well as to strengthen their negotiating position for terms of entry into the security sector. This practice can result in forced recruitment of individuals, including children, to increase the headcount. Security vacuums may be one further consequence of a disengagement process with the movement of ex-combatants to de- mobilization centres resulting in potential risks to communities. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188643,7 +188643,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2981, "Paragraph": "A number of common DDR\/SSR concerns relate to the disengagement of ex-combatants. Rebel groups often inflate their numbers before or at the start of a DDR process due to financial incentives as well as to strengthen their negotiating position for terms of entry into the security sector. This practice can result in forced recruitment of individuals, including children, to increase the headcount. Security vacuums may be one further consequence of a disengagement process with the movement of ex-combatants to de- mobilization centres resulting in potential risks to communities. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188661,7 +188661,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2982, "Paragraph": "Analysis of context-specific security dynamics linked to the disengagement process should provide a common basis for DDR\/SSR decisions. When negotiating with rebel groups, criteria for integration to the security sector should be carefully set and not based simply on the number of people the group can round up (see IDDRS 3.20 on DDR Programme Design, Para 6.5.3.4). The requirement that chil- dren be released prior to negotiations on integration into the armed forces should be stip- ulated and enforced to discourage their forced recruitment (see IDDRS 5.30 on Children and DDR). The risks of potential security vacuums as a result of the DDR process should provide a basis for joint DDR\/SSR coordination and planning.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188679,7 +188679,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2982, "Paragraph": "Analysis of context-specific security dynamics linked to the disengagement process should provide a common basis for DDR\/SSR decisions. When negotiating with rebel groups, criteria for integration to the security sector should be carefully set and not based simply on the number of people the group can round up (see IDDRS 3.20 on DDR Programme Design, Para 6.5.3.4). The requirement that chil- dren be released prior to negotiations on integration into the armed forces should be stip- ulated and enforced to discourage their forced recruitment (see IDDRS 5.30 on Children and DDR). The risks of potential security vacuums as a result of the DDR process should provide a basis for joint DDR\/SSR coordination and planning.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188697,7 +188697,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2982, "Paragraph": "Analysis of context-specific security dynamics linked to the disengagement process should provide a common basis for DDR\/SSR decisions. When negotiating with rebel groups, criteria for integration to the security sector should be carefully set and not based simply on the number of people the group can round up (see IDDRS 3.20 on DDR Programme Design, Para 6.5.3.4). The requirement that chil- dren be released prior to negotiations on integration into the armed forces should be stip- ulated and enforced to discourage their forced recruitment (see IDDRS 5.30 on Children and DDR). The risks of potential security vacuums as a result of the DDR process should provide a basis for joint DDR\/SSR coordination and planning.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188715,7 +188715,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2982, "Paragraph": "Analysis of context-specific security dynamics linked to the disengagement process should provide a common basis for DDR\/SSR decisions. When negotiating with rebel groups, criteria for integration to the security sector should be carefully set and not based simply on the number of people the group can round up (see IDDRS 3.20 on DDR Programme Design, Para 6.5.3.4). The requirement that chil- dren be released prior to negotiations on integration into the armed forces should be stip- ulated and enforced to discourage their forced recruitment (see IDDRS 5.30 on Children and DDR). The risks of potential security vacuums as a result of the DDR process should provide a basis for joint DDR\/SSR coordination and planning.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188733,7 +188733,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2983, "Paragraph": "The illegal exploitation of natural resources creates an obstacle to effective DDR and under- mines prospects for economic recovery. Control over natural resources provides a resource base for continued recruitment of combatants and the prolonging of violence. Rebel groups are unlikely to agree to disarmament\/demobilization if that means losing control of valu- able land.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188751,7 +188751,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2983, "Paragraph": "The illegal exploitation of natural resources creates an obstacle to effective DDR and under- mines prospects for economic recovery. Control over natural resources provides a resource base for continued recruitment of combatants and the prolonging of violence. Rebel groups are unlikely to agree to disarmament\/demobilization if that means losing control of valu- able land.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188769,7 +188769,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2983, "Paragraph": "The illegal exploitation of natural resources creates an obstacle to effective DDR and under- mines prospects for economic recovery. Control over natural resources provides a resource base for continued recruitment of combatants and the prolonging of violence. Rebel groups are unlikely to agree to disarmament\/demobilization if that means losing control of valu- able land.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188787,7 +188787,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2984, "Paragraph": "SSR activities should address relevant training requirements necessary for targeting armed groups in control of natural resources. Mandates and resource allocation for national security forces should be elaborated and allocated, where appropriate, to focus on this priority.11 Shared conflict and security analysis that focuses on this issue should inform DDR\/SSR planning processes.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188805,7 +188805,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2984, "Paragraph": "SSR activities should address relevant training requirements necessary for targeting armed groups in control of natural resources. Mandates and resource allocation for national security forces should be elaborated and allocated, where appropriate, to focus on this priority.11 Shared conflict and security analysis that focuses on this issue should inform DDR\/SSR planning processes.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188823,7 +188823,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2985, "Paragraph": "Policies establishing a new rank structure for members of the reformed security sector may facilitate integration by supporting the creation of a new command structure. It is particu- larly important to address perceived inequities between different groups in order to avoid resulting security risks.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188841,7 +188841,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2985, "Paragraph": "Policies establishing a new rank structure for members of the reformed security sector may facilitate integration by supporting the creation of a new command structure. It is particu- larly important to address perceived inequities between different groups in order to avoid resulting security risks.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188859,7 +188859,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2986, "Paragraph": "Rank harmonisation processes should be based on clear provisions in a peace agreement or other legal documents and be planned in full consideration of the consequences this may have on security budgets (i.e. if too many high ranks are attributed to ex-combatants). Policies should be based on consideration of appropriate criteria for determining ranks, the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups and an agreed formula for conver- sion from former armed groups to members of the reformed security sector.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188877,7 +188877,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2986, "Paragraph": "Rank harmonisation processes should be based on clear provisions in a peace agreement or other legal documents and be planned in full consideration of the consequences this may have on security budgets (i.e. if too many high ranks are attributed to ex-combatants). Policies should be based on consideration of appropriate criteria for determining ranks, the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups and an agreed formula for conver- sion from former armed groups to members of the reformed security sector.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188895,7 +188895,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2986, "Paragraph": "Rank harmonisation processes should be based on clear provisions in a peace agreement or other legal documents and be planned in full consideration of the consequences this may have on security budgets (i.e. if too many high ranks are attributed to ex-combatants). Policies should be based on consideration of appropriate criteria for determining ranks, the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups and an agreed formula for conver- sion from former armed groups to members of the reformed security sector.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188913,7 +188913,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2987, "Paragraph": "While the data capture at disarmament or demobilization points is designed to be utilised during reintegration, the early provision of relevant data can provide essential support to SSR processes. Sharing information can 1) help avoid multiple payments to ex-combatants registering for integration into more than one security sector institution, or for both inte- gration and reintegration; 2) provide the basis for a security sector census to help national authorities assess the number of ex-combatants that can realistically be accommodated within the security sector; 3) support human resource management by providing relevant information for the reform of security institutions; and 4) where appropriate, inform the vetting process for members of security sector institutions (see IDDRS 6.20 on DDR and Transitional Justice).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188931,7 +188931,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2987, "Paragraph": "While the data capture at disarmament or demobilization points is designed to be utilised during reintegration, the early provision of relevant data can provide essential support to SSR processes. Sharing information can 1) help avoid multiple payments to ex-combatants registering for integration into more than one security sector institution, or for both inte- gration and reintegration; 2) provide the basis for a security sector census to help national authorities assess the number of ex-combatants that can realistically be accommodated within the security sector; 3) support human resource management by providing relevant information for the reform of security institutions; and 4) where appropriate, inform the vetting process for members of security sector institutions (see IDDRS 6.20 on DDR and Transitional Justice).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188949,7 +188949,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2988, "Paragraph": "Extensive data is often collected during the demobilization stage (see Module 4.20 on Demobilization, Para 5.4). A mechanism for collecting and processing this information within the Management Information System (MIS) should capture information require- ments for both DDR and SSR and may also support related activities such as mine action (See Box 2). Relevant information should be used to support human resource and financial management needs for the security sector. (See Module 4.20 on Demobilization, Para 8.2, especially box on Military Information.) This may also support the work of those respon- sible for undertaking a census or vetting of security personnel. Guidelines should include confidentiality issues in order to mitigate against inappropriate use of information.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188967,7 +188967,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2988, "Paragraph": "Extensive data is often collected during the demobilization stage (see Module 4.20 on Demobilization, Para 5.4). A mechanism for collecting and processing this information within the Management Information System (MIS) should capture information require- ments for both DDR and SSR and may also support related activities such as mine action (See Box 2). Relevant information should be used to support human resource and financial management needs for the security sector. (See Module 4.20 on Demobilization, Para 8.2, especially box on Military Information.) This may also support the work of those respon- sible for undertaking a census or vetting of security personnel. Guidelines should include confidentiality issues in order to mitigate against inappropriate use of information.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -188985,7 +188985,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2988, "Paragraph": "Extensive data is often collected during the demobilization stage (see Module 4.20 on Demobilization, Para 5.4). A mechanism for collecting and processing this information within the Management Information System (MIS) should capture information require- ments for both DDR and SSR and may also support related activities such as mine action (See Box 2). Relevant information should be used to support human resource and financial management needs for the security sector. (See Module 4.20 on Demobilization, Para 8.2, especially box on Military Information.) This may also support the work of those respon- sible for undertaking a census or vetting of security personnel. Guidelines should include confidentiality issues in order to mitigate against inappropriate use of information.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189003,7 +189003,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2988, "Paragraph": "Extensive data is often collected during the demobilization stage (see Module 4.20 on Demobilization, Para 5.4). A mechanism for collecting and processing this information within the Management Information System (MIS) should capture information require- ments for both DDR and SSR and may also support related activities such as mine action (See Box 2). Relevant information should be used to support human resource and financial management needs for the security sector. (See Module 4.20 on Demobilization, Para 8.2, especially box on Military Information.) This may also support the work of those respon- sible for undertaking a census or vetting of security personnel. Guidelines should include confidentiality issues in order to mitigate against inappropriate use of information.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189021,7 +189021,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2988, "Paragraph": "Extensive data is often collected during the demobilization stage (see Module 4.20 on Demobilization, Para 5.4). A mechanism for collecting and processing this information within the Management Information System (MIS) should capture information require- ments for both DDR and SSR and may also support related activities such as mine action (See Box 2). Relevant information should be used to support human resource and financial management needs for the security sector. (See Module 4.20 on Demobilization, Para 8.2, especially box on Military Information.) This may also support the work of those respon- sible for undertaking a census or vetting of security personnel. Guidelines should include confidentiality issues in order to mitigate against inappropriate use of information.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189039,7 +189039,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2988, "Paragraph": "Extensive data is often collected during the demobilization stage (see Module 4.20 on Demobilization, Para 5.4). A mechanism for collecting and processing this information within the Management Information System (MIS) should capture information require- ments for both DDR and SSR and may also support related activities such as mine action (See Box 2). Relevant information should be used to support human resource and financial management needs for the security sector. (See Module 4.20 on Demobilization, Para 8.2, especially box on Military Information.) This may also support the work of those respon- sible for undertaking a census or vetting of security personnel. Guidelines should include confidentiality issues in order to mitigate against inappropriate use of information.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189055,9 +189055,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2989, - "Paragraph": "Box 2 Examples of DDR information requirements relevant for SSR \\n Sex \\n Age \\n Health Status \\n Rank or command function(s) \\n Length of service \\n Education\/Training \\n Literacy (especially for integration into the police) \\n Weapons specialisations \\n Knowledge of location\/use of landmines \\n Location\/willingness to re-locate \\n Dependents \\n Photo \\n Biometric digital imprint", + "Paragraph": "Box 2 Examples of DDR information requirements relevant for SSR \n Sex \n Age \n Health Status \n Rank or command function(s) \n Length of service \n Education\/Training \n Literacy (especially for integration into the police) \n Weapons specialisations \n Knowledge of location\/use of landmines \n Location\/willingness to re-locate \n Dependents \n Photo \n Biometric digital imprint", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189066,7 +189066,7 @@ "Heading2": "7.6. Data collection and management", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Box 2 Examples of DDR information requirements relevant for SSR \\n Sex \\n Age \\n Health Status \\n Rank or command function(s) \\n Length of service \\n Education\/Training \\n Literacy (especially for integration into the police) \\n Weapons specialisations \\n Knowledge of location\/use of landmines \\n Location\/willingness to re-locate \\n Dependents \\n Photo \\n Biometric digital imprint", + "Sentence": "Box 2 Examples of DDR information requirements relevant for SSR \n Sex \n Age \n Health Status \n Rank or command function(s) \n Length of service \n Education\/Training \n Literacy (especially for integration into the police) \n Weapons specialisations \n Knowledge of location\/use of landmines \n Location\/willingness to re-locate \n Dependents \n Photo \n Biometric digital imprint", "newParagraph": "box 2 example ddr information requirement relevant ssr n sex n age n health status n rank command function n length service n educationtraining n literacy especially integration police n weapon specialisation n knowledge locationuse landmines n locationwillingness relocate n dependent n photo n biometric digital imprint", "ProcessedSent": "box 2 example ddr information requirement relevant ssr n sex n age n health status n rank command function n length service n educationtraining n literacy especially integration police n weapon specialisation n knowledge locationuse landmines n locationwillingness relocate n dependent n photo n biometric digital imprint", "SentID": 10503 @@ -189075,7 +189075,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2990, "Paragraph": "Vetting is a particularly contentious issue in many post-conflict contexts. However, sensi- tively conducted, it provides a means of enhancing the integrity of security sector institutions through ensuring that personnel have the appropriate background and skills.12 Failure to take into account issues relating to past conduct can undermine the development of effec- tive and accountable security institutions that are trusted by individuals and communities. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189093,7 +189093,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2990, "Paragraph": "Vetting is a particularly contentious issue in many post-conflict contexts. However, sensi- tively conducted, it provides a means of enhancing the integrity of security sector institutions through ensuring that personnel have the appropriate background and skills.12 Failure to take into account issues relating to past conduct can undermine the development of effec- tive and accountable security institutions that are trusted by individuals and communities. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189111,7 +189111,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2991, "Paragraph": "The introduction of vetting programmes should be carefully considered in relation to minimum political conditions being met. These include sufficient political will and ade- quate national capacity to implement measures. Vetting processes should not single out ex-combatants but apply common criteria to all members of the vetted institution. Minimum requirements should include relevant skills or provision for re-training (particularly im- portant for ex-combatants integrated into reformed law enforcement bodies). Criteria should also include consideration of past conduct to ensure that known criminals, human rights abusers or perpetrators of war crimes are not admitted to the reformed security sector. (See IDDRS 6.20 on DDR and Transitional Justice.)", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189129,7 +189129,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2991, "Paragraph": "The introduction of vetting programmes should be carefully considered in relation to minimum political conditions being met. These include sufficient political will and ade- quate national capacity to implement measures. Vetting processes should not single out ex-combatants but apply common criteria to all members of the vetted institution. Minimum requirements should include relevant skills or provision for re-training (particularly im- portant for ex-combatants integrated into reformed law enforcement bodies). Criteria should also include consideration of past conduct to ensure that known criminals, human rights abusers or perpetrators of war crimes are not admitted to the reformed security sector. (See IDDRS 6.20 on DDR and Transitional Justice.)", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189147,7 +189147,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2991, "Paragraph": "The introduction of vetting programmes should be carefully considered in relation to minimum political conditions being met. These include sufficient political will and ade- quate national capacity to implement measures. Vetting processes should not single out ex-combatants but apply common criteria to all members of the vetted institution. Minimum requirements should include relevant skills or provision for re-training (particularly im- portant for ex-combatants integrated into reformed law enforcement bodies). Criteria should also include consideration of past conduct to ensure that known criminals, human rights abusers or perpetrators of war crimes are not admitted to the reformed security sector. (See IDDRS 6.20 on DDR and Transitional Justice.)", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189165,7 +189165,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2991, "Paragraph": "The introduction of vetting programmes should be carefully considered in relation to minimum political conditions being met. These include sufficient political will and ade- quate national capacity to implement measures. Vetting processes should not single out ex-combatants but apply common criteria to all members of the vetted institution. Minimum requirements should include relevant skills or provision for re-training (particularly im- portant for ex-combatants integrated into reformed law enforcement bodies). Criteria should also include consideration of past conduct to ensure that known criminals, human rights abusers or perpetrators of war crimes are not admitted to the reformed security sector. (See IDDRS 6.20 on DDR and Transitional Justice.)", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189183,7 +189183,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2991, "Paragraph": "The introduction of vetting programmes should be carefully considered in relation to minimum political conditions being met. These include sufficient political will and ade- quate national capacity to implement measures. Vetting processes should not single out ex-combatants but apply common criteria to all members of the vetted institution. Minimum requirements should include relevant skills or provision for re-training (particularly im- portant for ex-combatants integrated into reformed law enforcement bodies). Criteria should also include consideration of past conduct to ensure that known criminals, human rights abusers or perpetrators of war crimes are not admitted to the reformed security sector. (See IDDRS 6.20 on DDR and Transitional Justice.)", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189201,7 +189201,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2991, "Paragraph": "The introduction of vetting programmes should be carefully considered in relation to minimum political conditions being met. These include sufficient political will and ade- quate national capacity to implement measures. Vetting processes should not single out ex-combatants but apply common criteria to all members of the vetted institution. Minimum requirements should include relevant skills or provision for re-training (particularly im- portant for ex-combatants integrated into reformed law enforcement bodies). Criteria should also include consideration of past conduct to ensure that known criminals, human rights abusers or perpetrators of war crimes are not admitted to the reformed security sector. (See IDDRS 6.20 on DDR and Transitional Justice.)", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189219,7 +189219,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2992, "Paragraph": "Ex-combatants that have been socialized to the use of violence in conflict require proper support and training to assist their transition from armed combatant to security provider. Moreover, high HIV infection rates are common in many uniformed services and can com- promise command structures and combat readiness. Increasingly, there are national policies of screening recruits and excluding those who are HIV-positive.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189237,7 +189237,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2992, "Paragraph": "Ex-combatants that have been socialized to the use of violence in conflict require proper support and training to assist their transition from armed combatant to security provider. Moreover, high HIV infection rates are common in many uniformed services and can com- promise command structures and combat readiness. Increasingly, there are national policies of screening recruits and excluding those who are HIV-positive.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189255,7 +189255,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2992, "Paragraph": "Ex-combatants that have been socialized to the use of violence in conflict require proper support and training to assist their transition from armed combatant to security provider. Moreover, high HIV infection rates are common in many uniformed services and can com- promise command structures and combat readiness. Increasingly, there are national policies of screening recruits and excluding those who are HIV-positive.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189273,7 +189273,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2993, "Paragraph": "In addition to identifying appropriate selection criteria for combatants eligible for inte- gration, ex-combatants should be provided with sufficient training and sensitization on behaviour change, and access to psychosocial support to enable a successful transition. Engaging in HIV\/AIDS prevention at the outset of DDR will help to reduce new infections, thus\u2014where national policies of HIV screening are in place\u2014increasing the pool of potential candidates for recruitment, as well as assisting in planning for alternative occupational support and training for those found to be HIV-positive (see IDDRS Module 5.60 on HIV\/ AIDS and DDR).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189291,7 +189291,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2993, "Paragraph": "In addition to identifying appropriate selection criteria for combatants eligible for inte- gration, ex-combatants should be provided with sufficient training and sensitization on behaviour change, and access to psychosocial support to enable a successful transition. Engaging in HIV\/AIDS prevention at the outset of DDR will help to reduce new infections, thus\u2014where national policies of HIV screening are in place\u2014increasing the pool of potential candidates for recruitment, as well as assisting in planning for alternative occupational support and training for those found to be HIV-positive (see IDDRS Module 5.60 on HIV\/ AIDS and DDR).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189309,7 +189309,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2994, "Paragraph": "Offering ex-combatants a voluntary choice between integrating into the security sector and pursuing civilian livelihoods can, in certain cases, be problematic. Resulting challenges may include disproportionate numbers of officers compared to other ranks, or mismatches between national security priorities and the comparative advantages of different security providers. Excessive integration into the security sector may be unrealistic in relation to the absorptive capacity of these institutions as well as financial limitations and perceived security requirements. There is also a risk to community security if large numbers of ex- combatants return without the prospect of meaningful employment.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189327,7 +189327,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2994, "Paragraph": "Offering ex-combatants a voluntary choice between integrating into the security sector and pursuing civilian livelihoods can, in certain cases, be problematic. Resulting challenges may include disproportionate numbers of officers compared to other ranks, or mismatches between national security priorities and the comparative advantages of different security providers. Excessive integration into the security sector may be unrealistic in relation to the absorptive capacity of these institutions as well as financial limitations and perceived security requirements. There is also a risk to community security if large numbers of ex- combatants return without the prospect of meaningful employment.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189345,7 +189345,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2994, "Paragraph": "Offering ex-combatants a voluntary choice between integrating into the security sector and pursuing civilian livelihoods can, in certain cases, be problematic. Resulting challenges may include disproportionate numbers of officers compared to other ranks, or mismatches between national security priorities and the comparative advantages of different security providers. Excessive integration into the security sector may be unrealistic in relation to the absorptive capacity of these institutions as well as financial limitations and perceived security requirements. There is also a risk to community security if large numbers of ex- combatants return without the prospect of meaningful employment.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189363,7 +189363,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2994, "Paragraph": "Offering ex-combatants a voluntary choice between integrating into the security sector and pursuing civilian livelihoods can, in certain cases, be problematic. Resulting challenges may include disproportionate numbers of officers compared to other ranks, or mismatches between national security priorities and the comparative advantages of different security providers. Excessive integration into the security sector may be unrealistic in relation to the absorptive capacity of these institutions as well as financial limitations and perceived security requirements. There is also a risk to community security if large numbers of ex- combatants return without the prospect of meaningful employment.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189381,7 +189381,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2995, "Paragraph": "Decisions on the incentives provided to ex-combatants registering for demobilization versus those registering for integration should be carefully considered to avoid unsustain- able outcomes. The financial and social benefits provided to each group should not therefore strongly favour one option over the other. Funding considerations should reflect national financial limitations in order to avoid unwanted course corrections. A communication strategy should be developed to ensure that options are clearly understood. Job counsel- ling\u2014presenting realistic career options\u2014may also reduce the risk of raising expectations among demobilised combatants entering into socio-economic programmes (see IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration, Section 9.2).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189399,7 +189399,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2995, "Paragraph": "Decisions on the incentives provided to ex-combatants registering for demobilization versus those registering for integration should be carefully considered to avoid unsustain- able outcomes. The financial and social benefits provided to each group should not therefore strongly favour one option over the other. Funding considerations should reflect national financial limitations in order to avoid unwanted course corrections. A communication strategy should be developed to ensure that options are clearly understood. Job counsel- ling\u2014presenting realistic career options\u2014may also reduce the risk of raising expectations among demobilised combatants entering into socio-economic programmes (see IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration, Section 9.2).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189417,7 +189417,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2995, "Paragraph": "Decisions on the incentives provided to ex-combatants registering for demobilization versus those registering for integration should be carefully considered to avoid unsustain- able outcomes. The financial and social benefits provided to each group should not therefore strongly favour one option over the other. Funding considerations should reflect national financial limitations in order to avoid unwanted course corrections. A communication strategy should be developed to ensure that options are clearly understood. Job counsel- ling\u2014presenting realistic career options\u2014may also reduce the risk of raising expectations among demobilised combatants entering into socio-economic programmes (see IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration, Section 9.2).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189435,7 +189435,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2995, "Paragraph": "Decisions on the incentives provided to ex-combatants registering for demobilization versus those registering for integration should be carefully considered to avoid unsustain- able outcomes. The financial and social benefits provided to each group should not therefore strongly favour one option over the other. Funding considerations should reflect national financial limitations in order to avoid unwanted course corrections. A communication strategy should be developed to ensure that options are clearly understood. Job counsel- ling\u2014presenting realistic career options\u2014may also reduce the risk of raising expectations among demobilised combatants entering into socio-economic programmes (see IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration, Section 9.2).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189453,7 +189453,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2995, "Paragraph": "Decisions on the incentives provided to ex-combatants registering for demobilization versus those registering for integration should be carefully considered to avoid unsustain- able outcomes. The financial and social benefits provided to each group should not therefore strongly favour one option over the other. Funding considerations should reflect national financial limitations in order to avoid unwanted course corrections. A communication strategy should be developed to ensure that options are clearly understood. Job counsel- ling\u2014presenting realistic career options\u2014may also reduce the risk of raising expectations among demobilised combatants entering into socio-economic programmes (see IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration, Section 9.2).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189469,9 +189469,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2996, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 2 Integration followed by rightsizing in Burundi \\n Disproportionate numbers may need to be included in integrated force structures as a transitional measure to \u2018buy the peace\u2019 while \u2018rightsizing\u2019 is left to a later stage. This may be a necessary short-term solution but can heighten tensions if expectations are not managed. In Burundi, a two-step approach was adopted with ex-combatants first integrated into the armed forces with many demobilised in a second round. While it can be argued that the integrated army supported the conduct of peaceful elections in 2005, this double-trigger mechanism has generated uncertainty, frustration and disappointment amongst those demobilised through the subsequent rightsizing: at the beginning of 2008, 900 soldiers refused compulsory demobilization. The process lacked transparency and the criteria used for assessing those to be demobilised (i.e. disciplinary records) have been questioned. Moreover, the fact that previously integrated combatants develop skills within newly integrated security bodies that are subsequently lost undermines longer term SSR goals", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 2 Integration followed by rightsizing in Burundi \n Disproportionate numbers may need to be included in integrated force structures as a transitional measure to \u2018buy the peace\u2019 while \u2018rightsizing\u2019 is left to a later stage. This may be a necessary short-term solution but can heighten tensions if expectations are not managed. In Burundi, a two-step approach was adopted with ex-combatants first integrated into the armed forces with many demobilised in a second round. While it can be argued that the integrated army supported the conduct of peaceful elections in 2005, this double-trigger mechanism has generated uncertainty, frustration and disappointment amongst those demobilised through the subsequent rightsizing: at the beginning of 2008, 900 soldiers refused compulsory demobilization. The process lacked transparency and the criteria used for assessing those to be demobilised (i.e. disciplinary records) have been questioned. Moreover, the fact that previously integrated combatants develop skills within newly integrated security bodies that are subsequently lost undermines longer term SSR goals", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189480,16 +189480,16 @@ "Heading2": "7.9. Balancing demobilisation and security sector integration", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Case Study Box 2 Integration followed by rightsizing in Burundi \\n Disproportionate numbers may need to be included in integrated force structures as a transitional measure to \u2018buy the peace\u2019 while \u2018rightsizing\u2019 is left to a later stage.", + "Sentence": "Case Study Box 2 Integration followed by rightsizing in Burundi \n Disproportionate numbers may need to be included in integrated force structures as a transitional measure to \u2018buy the peace\u2019 while \u2018rightsizing\u2019 is left to a later stage.", "newParagraph": "case study box 2 integration followed rightsizing burundi n disproportionate number may need included integrated force structure transitional measure buy peace rightsizing left later stage may necessary shortterm solution heighten tension expectation managed burundi twostep approach adopted excombatants first integrated armed force many demobilised second round argued integrated army supported conduct peaceful election 2005 doubletrigger mechanism generated uncertainty frustration disappointment amongst demobilised subsequent rightsizing beginning 2008 900 soldier refused compulsory demobilization process lacked transparency criterion used assessing demobilised ie disciplinary record questioned moreover fact previously integrated combatant develop skill within newly integrated security body subsequently lost undermines longer term ssr goal", "ProcessedSent": "case study box 2 integration followed rightsizing burundi n disproportionate number may need included integrated force structure transitional measure buy peace rightsizing left later stage", "SentID": 10526 }, { "ParagraphID": 2996, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 2 Integration followed by rightsizing in Burundi \\n Disproportionate numbers may need to be included in integrated force structures as a transitional measure to \u2018buy the peace\u2019 while \u2018rightsizing\u2019 is left to a later stage. This may be a necessary short-term solution but can heighten tensions if expectations are not managed. In Burundi, a two-step approach was adopted with ex-combatants first integrated into the armed forces with many demobilised in a second round. While it can be argued that the integrated army supported the conduct of peaceful elections in 2005, this double-trigger mechanism has generated uncertainty, frustration and disappointment amongst those demobilised through the subsequent rightsizing: at the beginning of 2008, 900 soldiers refused compulsory demobilization. The process lacked transparency and the criteria used for assessing those to be demobilised (i.e. disciplinary records) have been questioned. Moreover, the fact that previously integrated combatants develop skills within newly integrated security bodies that are subsequently lost undermines longer term SSR goals", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 2 Integration followed by rightsizing in Burundi \n Disproportionate numbers may need to be included in integrated force structures as a transitional measure to \u2018buy the peace\u2019 while \u2018rightsizing\u2019 is left to a later stage. This may be a necessary short-term solution but can heighten tensions if expectations are not managed. In Burundi, a two-step approach was adopted with ex-combatants first integrated into the armed forces with many demobilised in a second round. While it can be argued that the integrated army supported the conduct of peaceful elections in 2005, this double-trigger mechanism has generated uncertainty, frustration and disappointment amongst those demobilised through the subsequent rightsizing: at the beginning of 2008, 900 soldiers refused compulsory demobilization. The process lacked transparency and the criteria used for assessing those to be demobilised (i.e. disciplinary records) have been questioned. Moreover, the fact that previously integrated combatants develop skills within newly integrated security bodies that are subsequently lost undermines longer term SSR goals", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189505,9 +189505,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2996, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 2 Integration followed by rightsizing in Burundi \\n Disproportionate numbers may need to be included in integrated force structures as a transitional measure to \u2018buy the peace\u2019 while \u2018rightsizing\u2019 is left to a later stage. This may be a necessary short-term solution but can heighten tensions if expectations are not managed. In Burundi, a two-step approach was adopted with ex-combatants first integrated into the armed forces with many demobilised in a second round. While it can be argued that the integrated army supported the conduct of peaceful elections in 2005, this double-trigger mechanism has generated uncertainty, frustration and disappointment amongst those demobilised through the subsequent rightsizing: at the beginning of 2008, 900 soldiers refused compulsory demobilization. The process lacked transparency and the criteria used for assessing those to be demobilised (i.e. disciplinary records) have been questioned. Moreover, the fact that previously integrated combatants develop skills within newly integrated security bodies that are subsequently lost undermines longer term SSR goals", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 2 Integration followed by rightsizing in Burundi \n Disproportionate numbers may need to be included in integrated force structures as a transitional measure to \u2018buy the peace\u2019 while \u2018rightsizing\u2019 is left to a later stage. This may be a necessary short-term solution but can heighten tensions if expectations are not managed. In Burundi, a two-step approach was adopted with ex-combatants first integrated into the armed forces with many demobilised in a second round. While it can be argued that the integrated army supported the conduct of peaceful elections in 2005, this double-trigger mechanism has generated uncertainty, frustration and disappointment amongst those demobilised through the subsequent rightsizing: at the beginning of 2008, 900 soldiers refused compulsory demobilization. The process lacked transparency and the criteria used for assessing those to be demobilised (i.e. disciplinary records) have been questioned. Moreover, the fact that previously integrated combatants develop skills within newly integrated security bodies that are subsequently lost undermines longer term SSR goals", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189523,9 +189523,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2996, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 2 Integration followed by rightsizing in Burundi \\n Disproportionate numbers may need to be included in integrated force structures as a transitional measure to \u2018buy the peace\u2019 while \u2018rightsizing\u2019 is left to a later stage. This may be a necessary short-term solution but can heighten tensions if expectations are not managed. In Burundi, a two-step approach was adopted with ex-combatants first integrated into the armed forces with many demobilised in a second round. While it can be argued that the integrated army supported the conduct of peaceful elections in 2005, this double-trigger mechanism has generated uncertainty, frustration and disappointment amongst those demobilised through the subsequent rightsizing: at the beginning of 2008, 900 soldiers refused compulsory demobilization. The process lacked transparency and the criteria used for assessing those to be demobilised (i.e. disciplinary records) have been questioned. Moreover, the fact that previously integrated combatants develop skills within newly integrated security bodies that are subsequently lost undermines longer term SSR goals", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 2 Integration followed by rightsizing in Burundi \n Disproportionate numbers may need to be included in integrated force structures as a transitional measure to \u2018buy the peace\u2019 while \u2018rightsizing\u2019 is left to a later stage. This may be a necessary short-term solution but can heighten tensions if expectations are not managed. In Burundi, a two-step approach was adopted with ex-combatants first integrated into the armed forces with many demobilised in a second round. While it can be argued that the integrated army supported the conduct of peaceful elections in 2005, this double-trigger mechanism has generated uncertainty, frustration and disappointment amongst those demobilised through the subsequent rightsizing: at the beginning of 2008, 900 soldiers refused compulsory demobilization. The process lacked transparency and the criteria used for assessing those to be demobilised (i.e. disciplinary records) have been questioned. Moreover, the fact that previously integrated combatants develop skills within newly integrated security bodies that are subsequently lost undermines longer term SSR goals", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189541,9 +189541,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2996, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 2 Integration followed by rightsizing in Burundi \\n Disproportionate numbers may need to be included in integrated force structures as a transitional measure to \u2018buy the peace\u2019 while \u2018rightsizing\u2019 is left to a later stage. This may be a necessary short-term solution but can heighten tensions if expectations are not managed. In Burundi, a two-step approach was adopted with ex-combatants first integrated into the armed forces with many demobilised in a second round. While it can be argued that the integrated army supported the conduct of peaceful elections in 2005, this double-trigger mechanism has generated uncertainty, frustration and disappointment amongst those demobilised through the subsequent rightsizing: at the beginning of 2008, 900 soldiers refused compulsory demobilization. The process lacked transparency and the criteria used for assessing those to be demobilised (i.e. disciplinary records) have been questioned. Moreover, the fact that previously integrated combatants develop skills within newly integrated security bodies that are subsequently lost undermines longer term SSR goals", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 2 Integration followed by rightsizing in Burundi \n Disproportionate numbers may need to be included in integrated force structures as a transitional measure to \u2018buy the peace\u2019 while \u2018rightsizing\u2019 is left to a later stage. This may be a necessary short-term solution but can heighten tensions if expectations are not managed. In Burundi, a two-step approach was adopted with ex-combatants first integrated into the armed forces with many demobilised in a second round. While it can be argued that the integrated army supported the conduct of peaceful elections in 2005, this double-trigger mechanism has generated uncertainty, frustration and disappointment amongst those demobilised through the subsequent rightsizing: at the beginning of 2008, 900 soldiers refused compulsory demobilization. The process lacked transparency and the criteria used for assessing those to be demobilised (i.e. disciplinary records) have been questioned. Moreover, the fact that previously integrated combatants develop skills within newly integrated security bodies that are subsequently lost undermines longer term SSR goals", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189559,9 +189559,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2996, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 2 Integration followed by rightsizing in Burundi \\n Disproportionate numbers may need to be included in integrated force structures as a transitional measure to \u2018buy the peace\u2019 while \u2018rightsizing\u2019 is left to a later stage. This may be a necessary short-term solution but can heighten tensions if expectations are not managed. In Burundi, a two-step approach was adopted with ex-combatants first integrated into the armed forces with many demobilised in a second round. While it can be argued that the integrated army supported the conduct of peaceful elections in 2005, this double-trigger mechanism has generated uncertainty, frustration and disappointment amongst those demobilised through the subsequent rightsizing: at the beginning of 2008, 900 soldiers refused compulsory demobilization. The process lacked transparency and the criteria used for assessing those to be demobilised (i.e. disciplinary records) have been questioned. Moreover, the fact that previously integrated combatants develop skills within newly integrated security bodies that are subsequently lost undermines longer term SSR goals", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 2 Integration followed by rightsizing in Burundi \n Disproportionate numbers may need to be included in integrated force structures as a transitional measure to \u2018buy the peace\u2019 while \u2018rightsizing\u2019 is left to a later stage. This may be a necessary short-term solution but can heighten tensions if expectations are not managed. In Burundi, a two-step approach was adopted with ex-combatants first integrated into the armed forces with many demobilised in a second round. While it can be argued that the integrated army supported the conduct of peaceful elections in 2005, this double-trigger mechanism has generated uncertainty, frustration and disappointment amongst those demobilised through the subsequent rightsizing: at the beginning of 2008, 900 soldiers refused compulsory demobilization. The process lacked transparency and the criteria used for assessing those to be demobilised (i.e. disciplinary records) have been questioned. Moreover, the fact that previously integrated combatants develop skills within newly integrated security bodies that are subsequently lost undermines longer term SSR goals", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189577,9 +189577,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2996, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 2 Integration followed by rightsizing in Burundi \\n Disproportionate numbers may need to be included in integrated force structures as a transitional measure to \u2018buy the peace\u2019 while \u2018rightsizing\u2019 is left to a later stage. This may be a necessary short-term solution but can heighten tensions if expectations are not managed. In Burundi, a two-step approach was adopted with ex-combatants first integrated into the armed forces with many demobilised in a second round. While it can be argued that the integrated army supported the conduct of peaceful elections in 2005, this double-trigger mechanism has generated uncertainty, frustration and disappointment amongst those demobilised through the subsequent rightsizing: at the beginning of 2008, 900 soldiers refused compulsory demobilization. The process lacked transparency and the criteria used for assessing those to be demobilised (i.e. disciplinary records) have been questioned. Moreover, the fact that previously integrated combatants develop skills within newly integrated security bodies that are subsequently lost undermines longer term SSR goals", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 2 Integration followed by rightsizing in Burundi \n Disproportionate numbers may need to be included in integrated force structures as a transitional measure to \u2018buy the peace\u2019 while \u2018rightsizing\u2019 is left to a later stage. This may be a necessary short-term solution but can heighten tensions if expectations are not managed. In Burundi, a two-step approach was adopted with ex-combatants first integrated into the armed forces with many demobilised in a second round. While it can be argued that the integrated army supported the conduct of peaceful elections in 2005, this double-trigger mechanism has generated uncertainty, frustration and disappointment amongst those demobilised through the subsequent rightsizing: at the beginning of 2008, 900 soldiers refused compulsory demobilization. The process lacked transparency and the criteria used for assessing those to be demobilised (i.e. disciplinary records) have been questioned. Moreover, the fact that previously integrated combatants develop skills within newly integrated security bodies that are subsequently lost undermines longer term SSR goals", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189597,7 +189597,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2997, "Paragraph": "Research has shown that there is a link between (future) crimes committed by security forces and inadequate terms and conditions of service. Poor social conditions within the security sector may also contribute to an unbalanced distribution of ex-combatants between reinte- gration and security sector integration.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189615,7 +189615,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2997, "Paragraph": "Research has shown that there is a link between (future) crimes committed by security forces and inadequate terms and conditions of service. Poor social conditions within the security sector may also contribute to an unbalanced distribution of ex-combatants between reinte- gration and security sector integration.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189633,7 +189633,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2998, "Paragraph": "SSR activities should focus from an early stage on addressing right-financing, man- agement and accountability in security budgeting. An important early measure may be to support the establishment of a chain of payments system to prevent the diversion of sala- ries and ensure prompt payment. These measures may be most effective if combined with a census of the armed and security forces (see Case Study Box 3). In parallel to the DDR process, efforts to enhance the knowledge base of groups responsible for oversight of the security sector should be supported. This may include visits of parliamentarians, repre- sentatives of the Ministry of Labour, the media and civil society organisations to security installations (including barracks).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189651,7 +189651,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2998, "Paragraph": "SSR activities should focus from an early stage on addressing right-financing, man- agement and accountability in security budgeting. An important early measure may be to support the establishment of a chain of payments system to prevent the diversion of sala- ries and ensure prompt payment. These measures may be most effective if combined with a census of the armed and security forces (see Case Study Box 3). In parallel to the DDR process, efforts to enhance the knowledge base of groups responsible for oversight of the security sector should be supported. This may include visits of parliamentarians, repre- sentatives of the Ministry of Labour, the media and civil society organisations to security installations (including barracks).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189669,7 +189669,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2998, "Paragraph": "SSR activities should focus from an early stage on addressing right-financing, man- agement and accountability in security budgeting. An important early measure may be to support the establishment of a chain of payments system to prevent the diversion of sala- ries and ensure prompt payment. These measures may be most effective if combined with a census of the armed and security forces (see Case Study Box 3). In parallel to the DDR process, efforts to enhance the knowledge base of groups responsible for oversight of the security sector should be supported. This may include visits of parliamentarians, repre- sentatives of the Ministry of Labour, the media and civil society organisations to security installations (including barracks).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189687,7 +189687,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2998, "Paragraph": "SSR activities should focus from an early stage on addressing right-financing, man- agement and accountability in security budgeting. An important early measure may be to support the establishment of a chain of payments system to prevent the diversion of sala- ries and ensure prompt payment. These measures may be most effective if combined with a census of the armed and security forces (see Case Study Box 3). In parallel to the DDR process, efforts to enhance the knowledge base of groups responsible for oversight of the security sector should be supported. This may include visits of parliamentarians, repre- sentatives of the Ministry of Labour, the media and civil society organisations to security installations (including barracks).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189705,7 +189705,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 2998, "Paragraph": "SSR activities should focus from an early stage on addressing right-financing, man- agement and accountability in security budgeting. An important early measure may be to support the establishment of a chain of payments system to prevent the diversion of sala- ries and ensure prompt payment. These measures may be most effective if combined with a census of the armed and security forces (see Case Study Box 3). In parallel to the DDR process, efforts to enhance the knowledge base of groups responsible for oversight of the security sector should be supported. This may include visits of parliamentarians, repre- sentatives of the Ministry of Labour, the media and civil society organisations to security installations (including barracks).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189721,9 +189721,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2999, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 3 The impact of the census and chain of payments system in the DRC \\n In the DRC, low or non-existent salaries within the army and police was a cause of disproportionate numbers of ex-combatants registering for reintegration as opposed to army integration. This resulted in a large backload in the payment of reinsertion benefits as well as difficulties in identifying reintegration opportunities for these ex-combatants. Two separate measures were taken to improve the overall human and financial management of the armed forces. A census of the army was conducted in 2008 which identified non-existent \u2018ghost soldiers.\u2019 Resulting savings benefited the army as a whole through an increase in overall salary levels. The \u2018chain of payments\u2019 system also had a similar effect of improving confidence in the system. The military chain of command was separated from the financial management process making it more difficult to re-route salary payments from their intended recipients. Resulting savings have led to improved terms and conditions for the soldiers, thus increasing incentives for ex-combatants choosing integration.", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 3 The impact of the census and chain of payments system in the DRC \n In the DRC, low or non-existent salaries within the army and police was a cause of disproportionate numbers of ex-combatants registering for reintegration as opposed to army integration. This resulted in a large backload in the payment of reinsertion benefits as well as difficulties in identifying reintegration opportunities for these ex-combatants. Two separate measures were taken to improve the overall human and financial management of the armed forces. A census of the army was conducted in 2008 which identified non-existent \u2018ghost soldiers.\u2019 Resulting savings benefited the army as a whole through an increase in overall salary levels. The \u2018chain of payments\u2019 system also had a similar effect of improving confidence in the system. The military chain of command was separated from the financial management process making it more difficult to re-route salary payments from their intended recipients. Resulting savings have led to improved terms and conditions for the soldiers, thus increasing incentives for ex-combatants choosing integration.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189732,16 +189732,16 @@ "Heading2": "7.10. Social conditions within the security sector", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Case Study Box 3 The impact of the census and chain of payments system in the DRC \\n In the DRC, low or non-existent salaries within the army and police was a cause of disproportionate numbers of ex-combatants registering for reintegration as opposed to army integration.", + "Sentence": "Case Study Box 3 The impact of the census and chain of payments system in the DRC \n In the DRC, low or non-existent salaries within the army and police was a cause of disproportionate numbers of ex-combatants registering for reintegration as opposed to army integration.", "newParagraph": "case study box 3 impact census chain payment system drc n drc low nonexistent salary within army police cause disproportionate number excombatants registering reintegration opposed army integration resulted large backload payment reinsertion benefit well difficulty identifying reintegration opportunity excombatants two separate measure taken improve overall human financial management armed force census army conducted 2008 identified nonexistent ghost soldier resulting saving benefited army whole increase overall salary level chain payment system also similar effect improving confidence system military chain command separated financial management process making difficult reroute salary payment intended recipient resulting saving led improved term condition soldier thus increasing incentive excombatants choosing integration", "ProcessedSent": "case study box 3 impact census chain payment system drc n drc low nonexistent salary within army police cause disproportionate number excombatants registering reintegration opposed army integration", "SentID": 10540 }, { "ParagraphID": 2999, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 3 The impact of the census and chain of payments system in the DRC \\n In the DRC, low or non-existent salaries within the army and police was a cause of disproportionate numbers of ex-combatants registering for reintegration as opposed to army integration. This resulted in a large backload in the payment of reinsertion benefits as well as difficulties in identifying reintegration opportunities for these ex-combatants. Two separate measures were taken to improve the overall human and financial management of the armed forces. A census of the army was conducted in 2008 which identified non-existent \u2018ghost soldiers.\u2019 Resulting savings benefited the army as a whole through an increase in overall salary levels. The \u2018chain of payments\u2019 system also had a similar effect of improving confidence in the system. The military chain of command was separated from the financial management process making it more difficult to re-route salary payments from their intended recipients. Resulting savings have led to improved terms and conditions for the soldiers, thus increasing incentives for ex-combatants choosing integration.", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 3 The impact of the census and chain of payments system in the DRC \n In the DRC, low or non-existent salaries within the army and police was a cause of disproportionate numbers of ex-combatants registering for reintegration as opposed to army integration. This resulted in a large backload in the payment of reinsertion benefits as well as difficulties in identifying reintegration opportunities for these ex-combatants. Two separate measures were taken to improve the overall human and financial management of the armed forces. A census of the army was conducted in 2008 which identified non-existent \u2018ghost soldiers.\u2019 Resulting savings benefited the army as a whole through an increase in overall salary levels. The \u2018chain of payments\u2019 system also had a similar effect of improving confidence in the system. The military chain of command was separated from the financial management process making it more difficult to re-route salary payments from their intended recipients. Resulting savings have led to improved terms and conditions for the soldiers, thus increasing incentives for ex-combatants choosing integration.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189757,9 +189757,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2999, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 3 The impact of the census and chain of payments system in the DRC \\n In the DRC, low or non-existent salaries within the army and police was a cause of disproportionate numbers of ex-combatants registering for reintegration as opposed to army integration. This resulted in a large backload in the payment of reinsertion benefits as well as difficulties in identifying reintegration opportunities for these ex-combatants. Two separate measures were taken to improve the overall human and financial management of the armed forces. A census of the army was conducted in 2008 which identified non-existent \u2018ghost soldiers.\u2019 Resulting savings benefited the army as a whole through an increase in overall salary levels. The \u2018chain of payments\u2019 system also had a similar effect of improving confidence in the system. The military chain of command was separated from the financial management process making it more difficult to re-route salary payments from their intended recipients. Resulting savings have led to improved terms and conditions for the soldiers, thus increasing incentives for ex-combatants choosing integration.", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 3 The impact of the census and chain of payments system in the DRC \n In the DRC, low or non-existent salaries within the army and police was a cause of disproportionate numbers of ex-combatants registering for reintegration as opposed to army integration. This resulted in a large backload in the payment of reinsertion benefits as well as difficulties in identifying reintegration opportunities for these ex-combatants. Two separate measures were taken to improve the overall human and financial management of the armed forces. A census of the army was conducted in 2008 which identified non-existent \u2018ghost soldiers.\u2019 Resulting savings benefited the army as a whole through an increase in overall salary levels. The \u2018chain of payments\u2019 system also had a similar effect of improving confidence in the system. The military chain of command was separated from the financial management process making it more difficult to re-route salary payments from their intended recipients. Resulting savings have led to improved terms and conditions for the soldiers, thus increasing incentives for ex-combatants choosing integration.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189775,9 +189775,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2999, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 3 The impact of the census and chain of payments system in the DRC \\n In the DRC, low or non-existent salaries within the army and police was a cause of disproportionate numbers of ex-combatants registering for reintegration as opposed to army integration. This resulted in a large backload in the payment of reinsertion benefits as well as difficulties in identifying reintegration opportunities for these ex-combatants. Two separate measures were taken to improve the overall human and financial management of the armed forces. A census of the army was conducted in 2008 which identified non-existent \u2018ghost soldiers.\u2019 Resulting savings benefited the army as a whole through an increase in overall salary levels. The \u2018chain of payments\u2019 system also had a similar effect of improving confidence in the system. The military chain of command was separated from the financial management process making it more difficult to re-route salary payments from their intended recipients. Resulting savings have led to improved terms and conditions for the soldiers, thus increasing incentives for ex-combatants choosing integration.", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 3 The impact of the census and chain of payments system in the DRC \n In the DRC, low or non-existent salaries within the army and police was a cause of disproportionate numbers of ex-combatants registering for reintegration as opposed to army integration. This resulted in a large backload in the payment of reinsertion benefits as well as difficulties in identifying reintegration opportunities for these ex-combatants. Two separate measures were taken to improve the overall human and financial management of the armed forces. A census of the army was conducted in 2008 which identified non-existent \u2018ghost soldiers.\u2019 Resulting savings benefited the army as a whole through an increase in overall salary levels. The \u2018chain of payments\u2019 system also had a similar effect of improving confidence in the system. The military chain of command was separated from the financial management process making it more difficult to re-route salary payments from their intended recipients. Resulting savings have led to improved terms and conditions for the soldiers, thus increasing incentives for ex-combatants choosing integration.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189793,9 +189793,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2999, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 3 The impact of the census and chain of payments system in the DRC \\n In the DRC, low or non-existent salaries within the army and police was a cause of disproportionate numbers of ex-combatants registering for reintegration as opposed to army integration. This resulted in a large backload in the payment of reinsertion benefits as well as difficulties in identifying reintegration opportunities for these ex-combatants. Two separate measures were taken to improve the overall human and financial management of the armed forces. A census of the army was conducted in 2008 which identified non-existent \u2018ghost soldiers.\u2019 Resulting savings benefited the army as a whole through an increase in overall salary levels. The \u2018chain of payments\u2019 system also had a similar effect of improving confidence in the system. The military chain of command was separated from the financial management process making it more difficult to re-route salary payments from their intended recipients. Resulting savings have led to improved terms and conditions for the soldiers, thus increasing incentives for ex-combatants choosing integration.", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 3 The impact of the census and chain of payments system in the DRC \n In the DRC, low or non-existent salaries within the army and police was a cause of disproportionate numbers of ex-combatants registering for reintegration as opposed to army integration. This resulted in a large backload in the payment of reinsertion benefits as well as difficulties in identifying reintegration opportunities for these ex-combatants. Two separate measures were taken to improve the overall human and financial management of the armed forces. A census of the army was conducted in 2008 which identified non-existent \u2018ghost soldiers.\u2019 Resulting savings benefited the army as a whole through an increase in overall salary levels. The \u2018chain of payments\u2019 system also had a similar effect of improving confidence in the system. The military chain of command was separated from the financial management process making it more difficult to re-route salary payments from their intended recipients. Resulting savings have led to improved terms and conditions for the soldiers, thus increasing incentives for ex-combatants choosing integration.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189811,9 +189811,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2999, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 3 The impact of the census and chain of payments system in the DRC \\n In the DRC, low or non-existent salaries within the army and police was a cause of disproportionate numbers of ex-combatants registering for reintegration as opposed to army integration. This resulted in a large backload in the payment of reinsertion benefits as well as difficulties in identifying reintegration opportunities for these ex-combatants. Two separate measures were taken to improve the overall human and financial management of the armed forces. A census of the army was conducted in 2008 which identified non-existent \u2018ghost soldiers.\u2019 Resulting savings benefited the army as a whole through an increase in overall salary levels. The \u2018chain of payments\u2019 system also had a similar effect of improving confidence in the system. The military chain of command was separated from the financial management process making it more difficult to re-route salary payments from their intended recipients. Resulting savings have led to improved terms and conditions for the soldiers, thus increasing incentives for ex-combatants choosing integration.", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 3 The impact of the census and chain of payments system in the DRC \n In the DRC, low or non-existent salaries within the army and police was a cause of disproportionate numbers of ex-combatants registering for reintegration as opposed to army integration. This resulted in a large backload in the payment of reinsertion benefits as well as difficulties in identifying reintegration opportunities for these ex-combatants. Two separate measures were taken to improve the overall human and financial management of the armed forces. A census of the army was conducted in 2008 which identified non-existent \u2018ghost soldiers.\u2019 Resulting savings benefited the army as a whole through an increase in overall salary levels. The \u2018chain of payments\u2019 system also had a similar effect of improving confidence in the system. The military chain of command was separated from the financial management process making it more difficult to re-route salary payments from their intended recipients. Resulting savings have led to improved terms and conditions for the soldiers, thus increasing incentives for ex-combatants choosing integration.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189829,9 +189829,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 2999, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 3 The impact of the census and chain of payments system in the DRC \\n In the DRC, low or non-existent salaries within the army and police was a cause of disproportionate numbers of ex-combatants registering for reintegration as opposed to army integration. This resulted in a large backload in the payment of reinsertion benefits as well as difficulties in identifying reintegration opportunities for these ex-combatants. Two separate measures were taken to improve the overall human and financial management of the armed forces. A census of the army was conducted in 2008 which identified non-existent \u2018ghost soldiers.\u2019 Resulting savings benefited the army as a whole through an increase in overall salary levels. The \u2018chain of payments\u2019 system also had a similar effect of improving confidence in the system. The military chain of command was separated from the financial management process making it more difficult to re-route salary payments from their intended recipients. Resulting savings have led to improved terms and conditions for the soldiers, thus increasing incentives for ex-combatants choosing integration.", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 3 The impact of the census and chain of payments system in the DRC \n In the DRC, low or non-existent salaries within the army and police was a cause of disproportionate numbers of ex-combatants registering for reintegration as opposed to army integration. This resulted in a large backload in the payment of reinsertion benefits as well as difficulties in identifying reintegration opportunities for these ex-combatants. Two separate measures were taken to improve the overall human and financial management of the armed forces. A census of the army was conducted in 2008 which identified non-existent \u2018ghost soldiers.\u2019 Resulting savings benefited the army as a whole through an increase in overall salary levels. The \u2018chain of payments\u2019 system also had a similar effect of improving confidence in the system. The military chain of command was separated from the financial management process making it more difficult to re-route salary payments from their intended recipients. Resulting savings have led to improved terms and conditions for the soldiers, thus increasing incentives for ex-combatants choosing integration.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189849,7 +189849,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3000, "Paragraph": "The absence of women from the security sector is not just discriminatory but can represent a lost opportunity to benefit from the different skill sets and approaches offered by women as security providers.13 Giving women the means and support to enter the DDR process should be linked to encouraging the full representation of women in the security sector and thus to meeting a key goal of Security Council Resolution 1325 (2000) (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR, Para 6.3). If female ex-combatants are not given adequate consideration in DDR processes, it is very unlikely they will be able to enter the security forces through the path of integration.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189867,7 +189867,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3000, "Paragraph": "The absence of women from the security sector is not just discriminatory but can represent a lost opportunity to benefit from the different skill sets and approaches offered by women as security providers.13 Giving women the means and support to enter the DDR process should be linked to encouraging the full representation of women in the security sector and thus to meeting a key goal of Security Council Resolution 1325 (2000) (see IDDRS 5.10 on Women, Gender and DDR, Para 6.3). If female ex-combatants are not given adequate consideration in DDR processes, it is very unlikely they will be able to enter the security forces through the path of integration.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189885,7 +189885,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3001, "Paragraph": "Specific measures shall be undertaken to ensure that women are encouraged to enter the DDR process by taking measures to de-stigmatise female combatants, by making avail- able adequate facilities for women during disarmament and demobilization, and by provid- ing specialised reinsertion kits and appropriate reintegration options to women. Female ex-combatants should be informed of their options under the DDR and SSR processes and incentives for joining a DDR programme should be linked to the option of a career within the security sector when female ex-combatants demobilise. Consideration of the specific challenges female ex-combatants face during reintegration (stigma, non-conventional skill sets, trauma) should also be given when considering their integration into the security sector. Related SSR measures should ensure that reformed security institutions provide fair and equal treatment to female personnel including their special security and protection needs.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189903,7 +189903,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3001, "Paragraph": "Specific measures shall be undertaken to ensure that women are encouraged to enter the DDR process by taking measures to de-stigmatise female combatants, by making avail- able adequate facilities for women during disarmament and demobilization, and by provid- ing specialised reinsertion kits and appropriate reintegration options to women. Female ex-combatants should be informed of their options under the DDR and SSR processes and incentives for joining a DDR programme should be linked to the option of a career within the security sector when female ex-combatants demobilise. Consideration of the specific challenges female ex-combatants face during reintegration (stigma, non-conventional skill sets, trauma) should also be given when considering their integration into the security sector. Related SSR measures should ensure that reformed security institutions provide fair and equal treatment to female personnel including their special security and protection needs.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189921,7 +189921,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3001, "Paragraph": "Specific measures shall be undertaken to ensure that women are encouraged to enter the DDR process by taking measures to de-stigmatise female combatants, by making avail- able adequate facilities for women during disarmament and demobilization, and by provid- ing specialised reinsertion kits and appropriate reintegration options to women. Female ex-combatants should be informed of their options under the DDR and SSR processes and incentives for joining a DDR programme should be linked to the option of a career within the security sector when female ex-combatants demobilise. Consideration of the specific challenges female ex-combatants face during reintegration (stigma, non-conventional skill sets, trauma) should also be given when considering their integration into the security sector. Related SSR measures should ensure that reformed security institutions provide fair and equal treatment to female personnel including their special security and protection needs.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189939,7 +189939,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3001, "Paragraph": "Specific measures shall be undertaken to ensure that women are encouraged to enter the DDR process by taking measures to de-stigmatise female combatants, by making avail- able adequate facilities for women during disarmament and demobilization, and by provid- ing specialised reinsertion kits and appropriate reintegration options to women. Female ex-combatants should be informed of their options under the DDR and SSR processes and incentives for joining a DDR programme should be linked to the option of a career within the security sector when female ex-combatants demobilise. Consideration of the specific challenges female ex-combatants face during reintegration (stigma, non-conventional skill sets, trauma) should also be given when considering their integration into the security sector. Related SSR measures should ensure that reformed security institutions provide fair and equal treatment to female personnel including their special security and protection needs.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189957,7 +189957,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3002, "Paragraph": "When considering demobilization based on semi-permanent (encampment) or mobile de- mobilization sites, a number of SSR-related factors should be taken into account. Mobile demobilization sites may offer greater flexibility for the DDR process as they are easier to set up, cheaper and may pose less of a security risk than encampment (see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). On the other hand, the cantonment of ex-combatants in a physical struc- ture can provide for greater oversight and control in sites that may have longer term utility as part of an SSR process.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189975,7 +189975,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3002, "Paragraph": "When considering demobilization based on semi-permanent (encampment) or mobile de- mobilization sites, a number of SSR-related factors should be taken into account. Mobile demobilization sites may offer greater flexibility for the DDR process as they are easier to set up, cheaper and may pose less of a security risk than encampment (see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). On the other hand, the cantonment of ex-combatants in a physical struc- ture can provide for greater oversight and control in sites that may have longer term utility as part of an SSR process.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -189993,7 +189993,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3002, "Paragraph": "When considering demobilization based on semi-permanent (encampment) or mobile de- mobilization sites, a number of SSR-related factors should be taken into account. Mobile demobilization sites may offer greater flexibility for the DDR process as they are easier to set up, cheaper and may pose less of a security risk than encampment (see IDDRS 4.20 on Demobilization). On the other hand, the cantonment of ex-combatants in a physical struc- ture can provide for greater oversight and control in sites that may have longer term utility as part of an SSR process.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190011,7 +190011,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3003, "Paragraph": "Planning for demobilization sites should assess the availability of a capable and neutral security provider, paying particular attention to the safety of women, girls and vulnerable groups. Developing a communication strategy in partnership with community leaders should be encouraged in order to dispel misperceptions, better understand potential threats and build confidence. The potential long term use of demobilization sites may also be a factor in DDR planning. Investment in physical sites may be used post-DDR for SSR activities with semi-permanent sites subsequently converted into barracks, thus offering cost savings. Similarly, the infrastructure created under the auspices of a DDR programme to collect and manage weapons may support a longer term weapons procurement and storage system.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190029,7 +190029,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3003, "Paragraph": "Planning for demobilization sites should assess the availability of a capable and neutral security provider, paying particular attention to the safety of women, girls and vulnerable groups. Developing a communication strategy in partnership with community leaders should be encouraged in order to dispel misperceptions, better understand potential threats and build confidence. The potential long term use of demobilization sites may also be a factor in DDR planning. Investment in physical sites may be used post-DDR for SSR activities with semi-permanent sites subsequently converted into barracks, thus offering cost savings. Similarly, the infrastructure created under the auspices of a DDR programme to collect and manage weapons may support a longer term weapons procurement and storage system.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190047,7 +190047,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3003, "Paragraph": "Planning for demobilization sites should assess the availability of a capable and neutral security provider, paying particular attention to the safety of women, girls and vulnerable groups. Developing a communication strategy in partnership with community leaders should be encouraged in order to dispel misperceptions, better understand potential threats and build confidence. The potential long term use of demobilization sites may also be a factor in DDR planning. Investment in physical sites may be used post-DDR for SSR activities with semi-permanent sites subsequently converted into barracks, thus offering cost savings. Similarly, the infrastructure created under the auspices of a DDR programme to collect and manage weapons may support a longer term weapons procurement and storage system.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190065,7 +190065,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3003, "Paragraph": "Planning for demobilization sites should assess the availability of a capable and neutral security provider, paying particular attention to the safety of women, girls and vulnerable groups. Developing a communication strategy in partnership with community leaders should be encouraged in order to dispel misperceptions, better understand potential threats and build confidence. The potential long term use of demobilization sites may also be a factor in DDR planning. Investment in physical sites may be used post-DDR for SSR activities with semi-permanent sites subsequently converted into barracks, thus offering cost savings. Similarly, the infrastructure created under the auspices of a DDR programme to collect and manage weapons may support a longer term weapons procurement and storage system.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190083,7 +190083,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3003, "Paragraph": "Planning for demobilization sites should assess the availability of a capable and neutral security provider, paying particular attention to the safety of women, girls and vulnerable groups. Developing a communication strategy in partnership with community leaders should be encouraged in order to dispel misperceptions, better understand potential threats and build confidence. The potential long term use of demobilization sites may also be a factor in DDR planning. Investment in physical sites may be used post-DDR for SSR activities with semi-permanent sites subsequently converted into barracks, thus offering cost savings. Similarly, the infrastructure created under the auspices of a DDR programme to collect and manage weapons may support a longer term weapons procurement and storage system.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190099,9 +190099,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3004, - "Paragraph": "Box 3 Action points for the transition from DDR to security sector integration \\n Integrate Information management \u2013 identify and include information requirements for both DDR and SSR when designing a Management Information System and establish mechanisms for information sharing. \\n Establish clear recruitment criteria \u2013 set specific criteria for integration into the security sector that reflect national security priorities and stipulate appropriate background\/skills. \\n Implement census and identification process \u2013 generate necessary baseline data to inform training needs, salary scales, equipment requirements, rank harmonisation policies etc. \\n Clarify roles and re-training requirements \u2013 of different security bodies and re-training for those with new roles within the system. \\n Ensure transparent chain of payments \u2013 for both ex-combatants integrated into the security sector and existing members. \\n Provide balanced benefits \u2013 consider how to balance benefits for entering the reintegration programme with those for integration into the security sector. \\n Support the transition from former combatant to security provider \u2013 through training, psychosocial support, and sensitization on behaviour change, GBV, and HIV", + "Paragraph": "Box 3 Action points for the transition from DDR to security sector integration \n Integrate Information management \u2013 identify and include information requirements for both DDR and SSR when designing a Management Information System and establish mechanisms for information sharing. \n Establish clear recruitment criteria \u2013 set specific criteria for integration into the security sector that reflect national security priorities and stipulate appropriate background\/skills. \n Implement census and identification process \u2013 generate necessary baseline data to inform training needs, salary scales, equipment requirements, rank harmonisation policies etc. \n Clarify roles and re-training requirements \u2013 of different security bodies and re-training for those with new roles within the system. \n Ensure transparent chain of payments \u2013 for both ex-combatants integrated into the security sector and existing members. \n Provide balanced benefits \u2013 consider how to balance benefits for entering the reintegration programme with those for integration into the security sector. \n Support the transition from former combatant to security provider \u2013 through training, psychosocial support, and sensitization on behaviour change, GBV, and HIV", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190110,16 +190110,16 @@ "Heading2": "7.12. Physical vs. mobile DDR structures", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Box 3 Action points for the transition from DDR to security sector integration \\n Integrate Information management \u2013 identify and include information requirements for both DDR and SSR when designing a Management Information System and establish mechanisms for information sharing.", + "Sentence": "Box 3 Action points for the transition from DDR to security sector integration \n Integrate Information management \u2013 identify and include information requirements for both DDR and SSR when designing a Management Information System and establish mechanisms for information sharing.", "newParagraph": "box 3 action point transition ddr security sector integration n integrate information management identify include information requirement ddr ssr designing management information system establish mechanism information sharing n establish clear recruitment criterion set specific criterion integration security sector reflect national security priority stipulate appropriate backgroundskills n implement census identification process generate necessary baseline data inform training need salary scale equipment requirement rank harmonisation policy etc n clarify role retraining requirement different security body retraining new role within system n ensure transparent chain payment excombatants integrated security sector existing member n provide balanced benefit consider balance benefit entering reintegration programme integration security sector n support transition former combatant security provider training psychosocial support sensitization behaviour change gbv hiv", "ProcessedSent": "box 3 action point transition ddr security sector integration n integrate information management identify include information requirement ddr ssr designing management information system establish mechanism information sharing", "SentID": 10561 }, { "ParagraphID": 3004, - "Paragraph": "Box 3 Action points for the transition from DDR to security sector integration \\n Integrate Information management \u2013 identify and include information requirements for both DDR and SSR when designing a Management Information System and establish mechanisms for information sharing. \\n Establish clear recruitment criteria \u2013 set specific criteria for integration into the security sector that reflect national security priorities and stipulate appropriate background\/skills. \\n Implement census and identification process \u2013 generate necessary baseline data to inform training needs, salary scales, equipment requirements, rank harmonisation policies etc. \\n Clarify roles and re-training requirements \u2013 of different security bodies and re-training for those with new roles within the system. \\n Ensure transparent chain of payments \u2013 for both ex-combatants integrated into the security sector and existing members. \\n Provide balanced benefits \u2013 consider how to balance benefits for entering the reintegration programme with those for integration into the security sector. \\n Support the transition from former combatant to security provider \u2013 through training, psychosocial support, and sensitization on behaviour change, GBV, and HIV", + "Paragraph": "Box 3 Action points for the transition from DDR to security sector integration \n Integrate Information management \u2013 identify and include information requirements for both DDR and SSR when designing a Management Information System and establish mechanisms for information sharing. \n Establish clear recruitment criteria \u2013 set specific criteria for integration into the security sector that reflect national security priorities and stipulate appropriate background\/skills. \n Implement census and identification process \u2013 generate necessary baseline data to inform training needs, salary scales, equipment requirements, rank harmonisation policies etc. \n Clarify roles and re-training requirements \u2013 of different security bodies and re-training for those with new roles within the system. \n Ensure transparent chain of payments \u2013 for both ex-combatants integrated into the security sector and existing members. \n Provide balanced benefits \u2013 consider how to balance benefits for entering the reintegration programme with those for integration into the security sector. \n Support the transition from former combatant to security provider \u2013 through training, psychosocial support, and sensitization on behaviour change, GBV, and HIV", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190128,16 +190128,16 @@ "Heading2": "7.12. Physical vs. mobile DDR structures", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Establish clear recruitment criteria \u2013 set specific criteria for integration into the security sector that reflect national security priorities and stipulate appropriate background\/skills.", + "Sentence": "\n Establish clear recruitment criteria \u2013 set specific criteria for integration into the security sector that reflect national security priorities and stipulate appropriate background\/skills.", "newParagraph": "box 3 action point transition ddr security sector integration n integrate information management identify include information requirement ddr ssr designing management information system establish mechanism information sharing n establish clear recruitment criterion set specific criterion integration security sector reflect national security priority stipulate appropriate backgroundskills n implement census identification process generate necessary baseline data inform training need salary scale equipment requirement rank harmonisation policy etc n clarify role retraining requirement different security body retraining new role within system n ensure transparent chain payment excombatants integrated security sector existing member n provide balanced benefit consider balance benefit entering reintegration programme integration security sector n support transition former combatant security provider training psychosocial support sensitization behaviour change gbv hiv", "ProcessedSent": "n establish clear recruitment criterion set specific criterion integration security sector reflect national security priority stipulate appropriate backgroundskills", "SentID": 10562 }, { "ParagraphID": 3004, - "Paragraph": "Box 3 Action points for the transition from DDR to security sector integration \\n Integrate Information management \u2013 identify and include information requirements for both DDR and SSR when designing a Management Information System and establish mechanisms for information sharing. \\n Establish clear recruitment criteria \u2013 set specific criteria for integration into the security sector that reflect national security priorities and stipulate appropriate background\/skills. \\n Implement census and identification process \u2013 generate necessary baseline data to inform training needs, salary scales, equipment requirements, rank harmonisation policies etc. \\n Clarify roles and re-training requirements \u2013 of different security bodies and re-training for those with new roles within the system. \\n Ensure transparent chain of payments \u2013 for both ex-combatants integrated into the security sector and existing members. \\n Provide balanced benefits \u2013 consider how to balance benefits for entering the reintegration programme with those for integration into the security sector. \\n Support the transition from former combatant to security provider \u2013 through training, psychosocial support, and sensitization on behaviour change, GBV, and HIV", + "Paragraph": "Box 3 Action points for the transition from DDR to security sector integration \n Integrate Information management \u2013 identify and include information requirements for both DDR and SSR when designing a Management Information System and establish mechanisms for information sharing. \n Establish clear recruitment criteria \u2013 set specific criteria for integration into the security sector that reflect national security priorities and stipulate appropriate background\/skills. \n Implement census and identification process \u2013 generate necessary baseline data to inform training needs, salary scales, equipment requirements, rank harmonisation policies etc. \n Clarify roles and re-training requirements \u2013 of different security bodies and re-training for those with new roles within the system. \n Ensure transparent chain of payments \u2013 for both ex-combatants integrated into the security sector and existing members. \n Provide balanced benefits \u2013 consider how to balance benefits for entering the reintegration programme with those for integration into the security sector. \n Support the transition from former combatant to security provider \u2013 through training, psychosocial support, and sensitization on behaviour change, GBV, and HIV", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190146,16 +190146,16 @@ "Heading2": "7.12. Physical vs. mobile DDR structures", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Implement census and identification process \u2013 generate necessary baseline data to inform training needs, salary scales, equipment requirements, rank harmonisation policies etc.", + "Sentence": "\n Implement census and identification process \u2013 generate necessary baseline data to inform training needs, salary scales, equipment requirements, rank harmonisation policies etc.", "newParagraph": "box 3 action point transition ddr security sector integration n integrate information management identify include information requirement ddr ssr designing management information system establish mechanism information sharing n establish clear recruitment criterion set specific criterion integration security sector reflect national security priority stipulate appropriate backgroundskills n implement census identification process generate necessary baseline data inform training need salary scale equipment requirement rank harmonisation policy etc n clarify role retraining requirement different security body retraining new role within system n ensure transparent chain payment excombatants integrated security sector existing member n provide balanced benefit consider balance benefit entering reintegration programme integration security sector n support transition former combatant security provider training psychosocial support sensitization behaviour change gbv hiv", "ProcessedSent": "n implement census identification process generate necessary baseline data inform training need salary scale equipment requirement rank harmonisation policy etc", "SentID": 10563 }, { "ParagraphID": 3004, - "Paragraph": "Box 3 Action points for the transition from DDR to security sector integration \\n Integrate Information management \u2013 identify and include information requirements for both DDR and SSR when designing a Management Information System and establish mechanisms for information sharing. \\n Establish clear recruitment criteria \u2013 set specific criteria for integration into the security sector that reflect national security priorities and stipulate appropriate background\/skills. \\n Implement census and identification process \u2013 generate necessary baseline data to inform training needs, salary scales, equipment requirements, rank harmonisation policies etc. \\n Clarify roles and re-training requirements \u2013 of different security bodies and re-training for those with new roles within the system. \\n Ensure transparent chain of payments \u2013 for both ex-combatants integrated into the security sector and existing members. \\n Provide balanced benefits \u2013 consider how to balance benefits for entering the reintegration programme with those for integration into the security sector. \\n Support the transition from former combatant to security provider \u2013 through training, psychosocial support, and sensitization on behaviour change, GBV, and HIV", + "Paragraph": "Box 3 Action points for the transition from DDR to security sector integration \n Integrate Information management \u2013 identify and include information requirements for both DDR and SSR when designing a Management Information System and establish mechanisms for information sharing. \n Establish clear recruitment criteria \u2013 set specific criteria for integration into the security sector that reflect national security priorities and stipulate appropriate background\/skills. \n Implement census and identification process \u2013 generate necessary baseline data to inform training needs, salary scales, equipment requirements, rank harmonisation policies etc. \n Clarify roles and re-training requirements \u2013 of different security bodies and re-training for those with new roles within the system. \n Ensure transparent chain of payments \u2013 for both ex-combatants integrated into the security sector and existing members. \n Provide balanced benefits \u2013 consider how to balance benefits for entering the reintegration programme with those for integration into the security sector. \n Support the transition from former combatant to security provider \u2013 through training, psychosocial support, and sensitization on behaviour change, GBV, and HIV", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190164,16 +190164,16 @@ "Heading2": "7.12. Physical vs. mobile DDR structures", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Clarify roles and re-training requirements \u2013 of different security bodies and re-training for those with new roles within the system.", + "Sentence": "\n Clarify roles and re-training requirements \u2013 of different security bodies and re-training for those with new roles within the system.", "newParagraph": "box 3 action point transition ddr security sector integration n integrate information management identify include information requirement ddr ssr designing management information system establish mechanism information sharing n establish clear recruitment criterion set specific criterion integration security sector reflect national security priority stipulate appropriate backgroundskills n implement census identification process generate necessary baseline data inform training need salary scale equipment requirement rank harmonisation policy etc n clarify role retraining requirement different security body retraining new role within system n ensure transparent chain payment excombatants integrated security sector existing member n provide balanced benefit consider balance benefit entering reintegration programme integration security sector n support transition former combatant security provider training psychosocial support sensitization behaviour change gbv hiv", "ProcessedSent": "n clarify role retraining requirement different security body retraining new role within system", "SentID": 10564 }, { "ParagraphID": 3004, - "Paragraph": "Box 3 Action points for the transition from DDR to security sector integration \\n Integrate Information management \u2013 identify and include information requirements for both DDR and SSR when designing a Management Information System and establish mechanisms for information sharing. \\n Establish clear recruitment criteria \u2013 set specific criteria for integration into the security sector that reflect national security priorities and stipulate appropriate background\/skills. \\n Implement census and identification process \u2013 generate necessary baseline data to inform training needs, salary scales, equipment requirements, rank harmonisation policies etc. \\n Clarify roles and re-training requirements \u2013 of different security bodies and re-training for those with new roles within the system. \\n Ensure transparent chain of payments \u2013 for both ex-combatants integrated into the security sector and existing members. \\n Provide balanced benefits \u2013 consider how to balance benefits for entering the reintegration programme with those for integration into the security sector. \\n Support the transition from former combatant to security provider \u2013 through training, psychosocial support, and sensitization on behaviour change, GBV, and HIV", + "Paragraph": "Box 3 Action points for the transition from DDR to security sector integration \n Integrate Information management \u2013 identify and include information requirements for both DDR and SSR when designing a Management Information System and establish mechanisms for information sharing. \n Establish clear recruitment criteria \u2013 set specific criteria for integration into the security sector that reflect national security priorities and stipulate appropriate background\/skills. \n Implement census and identification process \u2013 generate necessary baseline data to inform training needs, salary scales, equipment requirements, rank harmonisation policies etc. \n Clarify roles and re-training requirements \u2013 of different security bodies and re-training for those with new roles within the system. \n Ensure transparent chain of payments \u2013 for both ex-combatants integrated into the security sector and existing members. \n Provide balanced benefits \u2013 consider how to balance benefits for entering the reintegration programme with those for integration into the security sector. \n Support the transition from former combatant to security provider \u2013 through training, psychosocial support, and sensitization on behaviour change, GBV, and HIV", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190182,16 +190182,16 @@ "Heading2": "7.12. Physical vs. mobile DDR structures", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Ensure transparent chain of payments \u2013 for both ex-combatants integrated into the security sector and existing members.", + "Sentence": "\n Ensure transparent chain of payments \u2013 for both ex-combatants integrated into the security sector and existing members.", "newParagraph": "box 3 action point transition ddr security sector integration n integrate information management identify include information requirement ddr ssr designing management information system establish mechanism information sharing n establish clear recruitment criterion set specific criterion integration security sector reflect national security priority stipulate appropriate backgroundskills n implement census identification process generate necessary baseline data inform training need salary scale equipment requirement rank harmonisation policy etc n clarify role retraining requirement different security body retraining new role within system n ensure transparent chain payment excombatants integrated security sector existing member n provide balanced benefit consider balance benefit entering reintegration programme integration security sector n support transition former combatant security provider training psychosocial support sensitization behaviour change gbv hiv", "ProcessedSent": "n ensure transparent chain payment excombatants integrated security sector existing member", "SentID": 10565 }, { "ParagraphID": 3004, - "Paragraph": "Box 3 Action points for the transition from DDR to security sector integration \\n Integrate Information management \u2013 identify and include information requirements for both DDR and SSR when designing a Management Information System and establish mechanisms for information sharing. \\n Establish clear recruitment criteria \u2013 set specific criteria for integration into the security sector that reflect national security priorities and stipulate appropriate background\/skills. \\n Implement census and identification process \u2013 generate necessary baseline data to inform training needs, salary scales, equipment requirements, rank harmonisation policies etc. \\n Clarify roles and re-training requirements \u2013 of different security bodies and re-training for those with new roles within the system. \\n Ensure transparent chain of payments \u2013 for both ex-combatants integrated into the security sector and existing members. \\n Provide balanced benefits \u2013 consider how to balance benefits for entering the reintegration programme with those for integration into the security sector. \\n Support the transition from former combatant to security provider \u2013 through training, psychosocial support, and sensitization on behaviour change, GBV, and HIV", + "Paragraph": "Box 3 Action points for the transition from DDR to security sector integration \n Integrate Information management \u2013 identify and include information requirements for both DDR and SSR when designing a Management Information System and establish mechanisms for information sharing. \n Establish clear recruitment criteria \u2013 set specific criteria for integration into the security sector that reflect national security priorities and stipulate appropriate background\/skills. \n Implement census and identification process \u2013 generate necessary baseline data to inform training needs, salary scales, equipment requirements, rank harmonisation policies etc. \n Clarify roles and re-training requirements \u2013 of different security bodies and re-training for those with new roles within the system. \n Ensure transparent chain of payments \u2013 for both ex-combatants integrated into the security sector and existing members. \n Provide balanced benefits \u2013 consider how to balance benefits for entering the reintegration programme with those for integration into the security sector. \n Support the transition from former combatant to security provider \u2013 through training, psychosocial support, and sensitization on behaviour change, GBV, and HIV", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190200,16 +190200,16 @@ "Heading2": "7.12. Physical vs. mobile DDR structures", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Provide balanced benefits \u2013 consider how to balance benefits for entering the reintegration programme with those for integration into the security sector.", + "Sentence": "\n Provide balanced benefits \u2013 consider how to balance benefits for entering the reintegration programme with those for integration into the security sector.", "newParagraph": "box 3 action point transition ddr security sector integration n integrate information management identify include information requirement ddr ssr designing management information system establish mechanism information sharing n establish clear recruitment criterion set specific criterion integration security sector reflect national security priority stipulate appropriate backgroundskills n implement census identification process generate necessary baseline data inform training need salary scale equipment requirement rank harmonisation policy etc n clarify role retraining requirement different security body retraining new role within system n ensure transparent chain payment excombatants integrated security sector existing member n provide balanced benefit consider balance benefit entering reintegration programme integration security sector n support transition former combatant security provider training psychosocial support sensitization behaviour change gbv hiv", "ProcessedSent": "n provide balanced benefit consider balance benefit entering reintegration programme integration security sector", "SentID": 10566 }, { "ParagraphID": 3004, - "Paragraph": "Box 3 Action points for the transition from DDR to security sector integration \\n Integrate Information management \u2013 identify and include information requirements for both DDR and SSR when designing a Management Information System and establish mechanisms for information sharing. \\n Establish clear recruitment criteria \u2013 set specific criteria for integration into the security sector that reflect national security priorities and stipulate appropriate background\/skills. \\n Implement census and identification process \u2013 generate necessary baseline data to inform training needs, salary scales, equipment requirements, rank harmonisation policies etc. \\n Clarify roles and re-training requirements \u2013 of different security bodies and re-training for those with new roles within the system. \\n Ensure transparent chain of payments \u2013 for both ex-combatants integrated into the security sector and existing members. \\n Provide balanced benefits \u2013 consider how to balance benefits for entering the reintegration programme with those for integration into the security sector. \\n Support the transition from former combatant to security provider \u2013 through training, psychosocial support, and sensitization on behaviour change, GBV, and HIV", + "Paragraph": "Box 3 Action points for the transition from DDR to security sector integration \n Integrate Information management \u2013 identify and include information requirements for both DDR and SSR when designing a Management Information System and establish mechanisms for information sharing. \n Establish clear recruitment criteria \u2013 set specific criteria for integration into the security sector that reflect national security priorities and stipulate appropriate background\/skills. \n Implement census and identification process \u2013 generate necessary baseline data to inform training needs, salary scales, equipment requirements, rank harmonisation policies etc. \n Clarify roles and re-training requirements \u2013 of different security bodies and re-training for those with new roles within the system. \n Ensure transparent chain of payments \u2013 for both ex-combatants integrated into the security sector and existing members. \n Provide balanced benefits \u2013 consider how to balance benefits for entering the reintegration programme with those for integration into the security sector. \n Support the transition from former combatant to security provider \u2013 through training, psychosocial support, and sensitization on behaviour change, GBV, and HIV", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190218,7 +190218,7 @@ "Heading2": "7.12. Physical vs. mobile DDR structures", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Support the transition from former combatant to security provider \u2013 through training, psychosocial support, and sensitization on behaviour change, GBV, and HIV", + "Sentence": "\n Support the transition from former combatant to security provider \u2013 through training, psychosocial support, and sensitization on behaviour change, GBV, and HIV", "newParagraph": "box 3 action point transition ddr security sector integration n integrate information management identify include information requirement ddr ssr designing management information system establish mechanism information sharing n establish clear recruitment criterion set specific criterion integration security sector reflect national security priority stipulate appropriate backgroundskills n implement census identification process generate necessary baseline data inform training need salary scale equipment requirement rank harmonisation policy etc n clarify role retraining requirement different security body retraining new role within system n ensure transparent chain payment excombatants integrated security sector existing member n provide balanced benefit consider balance benefit entering reintegration programme integration security sector n support transition former combatant security provider training psychosocial support sensitization behaviour change gbv hiv", "ProcessedSent": "n support transition former combatant security provider training psychosocial support sensitization behaviour change gbv hiv", "SentID": 10567 @@ -190227,7 +190227,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3005, "Paragraph": "While the military remains a central actor, during the reintegration phase, common DDR\/ SSR concerns focus on community safety and policing initiatives. Activities relating to the judiciary, border management and revenue collection, as well as wider issues pertaining to the inclusion of ex-combatants and their receiving communities in local and national decision making processes are also significant.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190245,7 +190245,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3005, "Paragraph": "While the military remains a central actor, during the reintegration phase, common DDR\/ SSR concerns focus on community safety and policing initiatives. Activities relating to the judiciary, border management and revenue collection, as well as wider issues pertaining to the inclusion of ex-combatants and their receiving communities in local and national decision making processes are also significant.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190263,7 +190263,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3006, "Paragraph": "Targeting reintegration options and securing vulnerable communities represents an im- portant area where synergies can be developed between DDR and SSR programmes. The reintegration of ex-combatants into the community provides a unique opportunity for con- fidence building between law enforcement bodies and local residents. The police has a key role to play in ensuring the safety of returning ex-combatants as well as securing communities that may be at greater risk following their return (see IDDRS 4.50 on UN Police Roles and Responsibilities, Para 11). However, police capacities will only be focused on this prior- ity if support to the DDR process is factored into planning, training and resource allocation. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190281,7 +190281,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3006, "Paragraph": "Targeting reintegration options and securing vulnerable communities represents an im- portant area where synergies can be developed between DDR and SSR programmes. The reintegration of ex-combatants into the community provides a unique opportunity for con- fidence building between law enforcement bodies and local residents. The police has a key role to play in ensuring the safety of returning ex-combatants as well as securing communities that may be at greater risk following their return (see IDDRS 4.50 on UN Police Roles and Responsibilities, Para 11). However, police capacities will only be focused on this prior- ity if support to the DDR process is factored into planning, training and resource allocation. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190299,7 +190299,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3006, "Paragraph": "Targeting reintegration options and securing vulnerable communities represents an im- portant area where synergies can be developed between DDR and SSR programmes. The reintegration of ex-combatants into the community provides a unique opportunity for con- fidence building between law enforcement bodies and local residents. The police has a key role to play in ensuring the safety of returning ex-combatants as well as securing communities that may be at greater risk following their return (see IDDRS 4.50 on UN Police Roles and Responsibilities, Para 11). However, police capacities will only be focused on this prior- ity if support to the DDR process is factored into planning, training and resource allocation. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190317,7 +190317,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3006, "Paragraph": "Targeting reintegration options and securing vulnerable communities represents an im- portant area where synergies can be developed between DDR and SSR programmes. The reintegration of ex-combatants into the community provides a unique opportunity for con- fidence building between law enforcement bodies and local residents. The police has a key role to play in ensuring the safety of returning ex-combatants as well as securing communities that may be at greater risk following their return (see IDDRS 4.50 on UN Police Roles and Responsibilities, Para 11). However, police capacities will only be focused on this prior- ity if support to the DDR process is factored into planning, training and resource allocation. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190335,7 +190335,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3007, "Paragraph": "The ability of ex-combatants and their receiving communities to communicate their concerns and priorities to local law enforcement agencies, and vice-versa, is a key compo- nent of sustainable reintegration. Reintegration may provide an entry point for the develop- ment of local security plans through constructive dialogue between communities, including vulnerable and marginalised groups, and security providers. Capacity development within the military, police and other community level security providers should be prioritised to ensure police support for DDR objectives. In parallel, mandates and tasking should reflect the critical role of the police in establishing an enabling environment for the successful reintegration of ex-combatants.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190353,7 +190353,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3007, "Paragraph": "The ability of ex-combatants and their receiving communities to communicate their concerns and priorities to local law enforcement agencies, and vice-versa, is a key compo- nent of sustainable reintegration. Reintegration may provide an entry point for the develop- ment of local security plans through constructive dialogue between communities, including vulnerable and marginalised groups, and security providers. Capacity development within the military, police and other community level security providers should be prioritised to ensure police support for DDR objectives. In parallel, mandates and tasking should reflect the critical role of the police in establishing an enabling environment for the successful reintegration of ex-combatants.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190371,7 +190371,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3007, "Paragraph": "The ability of ex-combatants and their receiving communities to communicate their concerns and priorities to local law enforcement agencies, and vice-versa, is a key compo- nent of sustainable reintegration. Reintegration may provide an entry point for the develop- ment of local security plans through constructive dialogue between communities, including vulnerable and marginalised groups, and security providers. Capacity development within the military, police and other community level security providers should be prioritised to ensure police support for DDR objectives. In parallel, mandates and tasking should reflect the critical role of the police in establishing an enabling environment for the successful reintegration of ex-combatants.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190389,7 +190389,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3007, "Paragraph": "The ability of ex-combatants and their receiving communities to communicate their concerns and priorities to local law enforcement agencies, and vice-versa, is a key compo- nent of sustainable reintegration. Reintegration may provide an entry point for the develop- ment of local security plans through constructive dialogue between communities, including vulnerable and marginalised groups, and security providers. Capacity development within the military, police and other community level security providers should be prioritised to ensure police support for DDR objectives. In parallel, mandates and tasking should reflect the critical role of the police in establishing an enabling environment for the successful reintegration of ex-combatants.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190407,7 +190407,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3008, "Paragraph": "There is a need to identify and act on information relating to the return and reintegration of ex-combatants. This can support the DDR process by facilitating reinsertion payments for ex-combatants and monitoring areas where employment opportunities exist. From an SSR perspective, better understanding the dynamics of returning ex-combatants can help identify potential security risks and sequence appropriate SSR support.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190425,7 +190425,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3008, "Paragraph": "There is a need to identify and act on information relating to the return and reintegration of ex-combatants. This can support the DDR process by facilitating reinsertion payments for ex-combatants and monitoring areas where employment opportunities exist. From an SSR perspective, better understanding the dynamics of returning ex-combatants can help identify potential security risks and sequence appropriate SSR support.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190443,7 +190443,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3008, "Paragraph": "There is a need to identify and act on information relating to the return and reintegration of ex-combatants. This can support the DDR process by facilitating reinsertion payments for ex-combatants and monitoring areas where employment opportunities exist. From an SSR perspective, better understanding the dynamics of returning ex-combatants can help identify potential security risks and sequence appropriate SSR support.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190461,7 +190461,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3009, "Paragraph": "Conflict and security analysis that takes account of returning ex-combatants is a com- mon DDR\/SSR requirement. Comprehensive and reliable data collection and analysis may be developed and shared in order to understand shifting security dynamics and agree security needs linked to the return of ex-combatants. This should provide the basis for coordinated planning and implementation of DDR\/SSR activities. Where there is mistrust between security forces and ex-combatants, information security should be an important consideration.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190479,7 +190479,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3009, "Paragraph": "Conflict and security analysis that takes account of returning ex-combatants is a com- mon DDR\/SSR requirement. Comprehensive and reliable data collection and analysis may be developed and shared in order to understand shifting security dynamics and agree security needs linked to the return of ex-combatants. This should provide the basis for coordinated planning and implementation of DDR\/SSR activities. Where there is mistrust between security forces and ex-combatants, information security should be an important consideration.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190497,7 +190497,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3009, "Paragraph": "Conflict and security analysis that takes account of returning ex-combatants is a com- mon DDR\/SSR requirement. Comprehensive and reliable data collection and analysis may be developed and shared in order to understand shifting security dynamics and agree security needs linked to the return of ex-combatants. This should provide the basis for coordinated planning and implementation of DDR\/SSR activities. Where there is mistrust between security forces and ex-combatants, information security should be an important consideration.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190515,7 +190515,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3009, "Paragraph": "Conflict and security analysis that takes account of returning ex-combatants is a com- mon DDR\/SSR requirement. Comprehensive and reliable data collection and analysis may be developed and shared in order to understand shifting security dynamics and agree security needs linked to the return of ex-combatants. This should provide the basis for coordinated planning and implementation of DDR\/SSR activities. Where there is mistrust between security forces and ex-combatants, information security should be an important consideration.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190533,7 +190533,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3010, "Paragraph": "HLP projects are often developed to support the return of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and other vulnerable groups. While ex-combatants only represent a small segment of this group, they are more likely to resort to intimidation or force in order to attempt to resolve disputes. Moreover, ex-combatants may find that their land has been occupied as a deliberate strategy of intimidation. HLP therefore offers an opportunity to support re-integration while mitigating potential security problems down the line (see IDDRS module 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration). Complementary SSR measures that address the return of ex-combatants may focus on supporting dispute resolution mechanisms as well as addressing related security threats. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190551,7 +190551,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3010, "Paragraph": "HLP projects are often developed to support the return of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and other vulnerable groups. While ex-combatants only represent a small segment of this group, they are more likely to resort to intimidation or force in order to attempt to resolve disputes. Moreover, ex-combatants may find that their land has been occupied as a deliberate strategy of intimidation. HLP therefore offers an opportunity to support re-integration while mitigating potential security problems down the line (see IDDRS module 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration). Complementary SSR measures that address the return of ex-combatants may focus on supporting dispute resolution mechanisms as well as addressing related security threats. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190569,7 +190569,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3010, "Paragraph": "HLP projects are often developed to support the return of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and other vulnerable groups. While ex-combatants only represent a small segment of this group, they are more likely to resort to intimidation or force in order to attempt to resolve disputes. Moreover, ex-combatants may find that their land has been occupied as a deliberate strategy of intimidation. HLP therefore offers an opportunity to support re-integration while mitigating potential security problems down the line (see IDDRS module 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration). Complementary SSR measures that address the return of ex-combatants may focus on supporting dispute resolution mechanisms as well as addressing related security threats. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190587,7 +190587,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3010, "Paragraph": "HLP projects are often developed to support the return of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and other vulnerable groups. While ex-combatants only represent a small segment of this group, they are more likely to resort to intimidation or force in order to attempt to resolve disputes. Moreover, ex-combatants may find that their land has been occupied as a deliberate strategy of intimidation. HLP therefore offers an opportunity to support re-integration while mitigating potential security problems down the line (see IDDRS module 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration). Complementary SSR measures that address the return of ex-combatants may focus on supporting dispute resolution mechanisms as well as addressing related security threats. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190605,7 +190605,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3010, "Paragraph": "HLP projects are often developed to support the return of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and other vulnerable groups. While ex-combatants only represent a small segment of this group, they are more likely to resort to intimidation or force in order to attempt to resolve disputes. Moreover, ex-combatants may find that their land has been occupied as a deliberate strategy of intimidation. HLP therefore offers an opportunity to support re-integration while mitigating potential security problems down the line (see IDDRS module 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration). Complementary SSR measures that address the return of ex-combatants may focus on supporting dispute resolution mechanisms as well as addressing related security threats. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190623,7 +190623,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3011, "Paragraph": "Engagement with local authorities, community security and justice providers on HLP offers a means to link SSR concerns with support for returning ex-combatants. The devel- opment of special mechanisms for ex-combatants may be considered so that the time- sensitivity and stigma associated with their cases is taken into consideration. This should be balanced against the risk of perceived inequalities between ex-combatants and receiving communities. In either case, it is important to provide sensitisation on available support structures and how to access them.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190641,7 +190641,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3011, "Paragraph": "Engagement with local authorities, community security and justice providers on HLP offers a means to link SSR concerns with support for returning ex-combatants. The devel- opment of special mechanisms for ex-combatants may be considered so that the time- sensitivity and stigma associated with their cases is taken into consideration. This should be balanced against the risk of perceived inequalities between ex-combatants and receiving communities. In either case, it is important to provide sensitisation on available support structures and how to access them.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190659,7 +190659,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3011, "Paragraph": "Engagement with local authorities, community security and justice providers on HLP offers a means to link SSR concerns with support for returning ex-combatants. The devel- opment of special mechanisms for ex-combatants may be considered so that the time- sensitivity and stigma associated with their cases is taken into consideration. This should be balanced against the risk of perceived inequalities between ex-combatants and receiving communities. In either case, it is important to provide sensitisation on available support structures and how to access them.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190677,7 +190677,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3011, "Paragraph": "Engagement with local authorities, community security and justice providers on HLP offers a means to link SSR concerns with support for returning ex-combatants. The devel- opment of special mechanisms for ex-combatants may be considered so that the time- sensitivity and stigma associated with their cases is taken into consideration. This should be balanced against the risk of perceived inequalities between ex-combatants and receiving communities. In either case, it is important to provide sensitisation on available support structures and how to access them.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190695,7 +190695,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3012, "Paragraph": "Community security initiatives can be considered as a mechanism for both encouraging acceptance of ex-combatants and enhancing the status of local police forces in the eyes of communities (see IDDRS 4.50 on UN Police Roles and Responsibilities). Community-policing is increasingly supported as part of SSR programmes. Integrated DDR programme plan- ning may also include community security projects such as youth at risk programmes and community policing and support services (see IDDRS 3.41 on Finance and Budgeting).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190713,7 +190713,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3012, "Paragraph": "Community security initiatives can be considered as a mechanism for both encouraging acceptance of ex-combatants and enhancing the status of local police forces in the eyes of communities (see IDDRS 4.50 on UN Police Roles and Responsibilities). Community-policing is increasingly supported as part of SSR programmes. Integrated DDR programme plan- ning may also include community security projects such as youth at risk programmes and community policing and support services (see IDDRS 3.41 on Finance and Budgeting).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190731,7 +190731,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3012, "Paragraph": "Community security initiatives can be considered as a mechanism for both encouraging acceptance of ex-combatants and enhancing the status of local police forces in the eyes of communities (see IDDRS 4.50 on UN Police Roles and Responsibilities). Community-policing is increasingly supported as part of SSR programmes. Integrated DDR programme plan- ning may also include community security projects such as youth at risk programmes and community policing and support services (see IDDRS 3.41 on Finance and Budgeting).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190749,7 +190749,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3013, "Paragraph": "Community security initiatives provide an entry point for developing synergies be- tween DDR and SSR. DDR programmes may benefit from engaging with police public information units to disseminate information about the DDR process at the community level. Pooling financial and human resources including joint information campaigns may contribute to improved outreach, cost-savings and increased coherence.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190767,7 +190767,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3013, "Paragraph": "Community security initiatives provide an entry point for developing synergies be- tween DDR and SSR. DDR programmes may benefit from engaging with police public information units to disseminate information about the DDR process at the community level. Pooling financial and human resources including joint information campaigns may contribute to improved outreach, cost-savings and increased coherence.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190785,7 +190785,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3013, "Paragraph": "Community security initiatives provide an entry point for developing synergies be- tween DDR and SSR. DDR programmes may benefit from engaging with police public information units to disseminate information about the DDR process at the community level. Pooling financial and human resources including joint information campaigns may contribute to improved outreach, cost-savings and increased coherence.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190801,9 +190801,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3014, - "Paragraph": "Box 4 DDR\/SSR action points for supporting community security \\n Identify and include relevant law enforcement considerations in DDR planning. Where appropriate, coordinate reintegration with police authorities to promote coherence. \\n Assess the security dynamics of returning ex-combatants. Consider whether information generated from tracking the reintegration of ex-combatants should be shared with the national police. If so, make provision for data confidentiality. \\n Consider opportunities to support joint community safety initiatives (e.g. weapons collection, community policing). \\n Support work with men and boys in violence reduction initiatives, including GBV.", + "Paragraph": "Box 4 DDR\/SSR action points for supporting community security \n Identify and include relevant law enforcement considerations in DDR planning. Where appropriate, coordinate reintegration with police authorities to promote coherence. \n Assess the security dynamics of returning ex-combatants. Consider whether information generated from tracking the reintegration of ex-combatants should be shared with the national police. If so, make provision for data confidentiality. \n Consider opportunities to support joint community safety initiatives (e.g. weapons collection, community policing). \n Support work with men and boys in violence reduction initiatives, including GBV.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190812,16 +190812,16 @@ "Heading2": "8.4. Community security initiatives", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Box 4 DDR\/SSR action points for supporting community security \\n Identify and include relevant law enforcement considerations in DDR planning.", + "Sentence": "Box 4 DDR\/SSR action points for supporting community security \n Identify and include relevant law enforcement considerations in DDR planning.", "newParagraph": "box 4 ddrssr action point supporting community security n identify include relevant law enforcement consideration ddr planning appropriate coordinate reintegration police authority promote coherence n ass security dynamic returning excombatants consider whether information generated tracking reintegration excombatants shared national police make provision data confidentiality n consider opportunity support joint community safety initiative eg weapon collection community policing n support work men boy violence reduction initiative including gbv", "ProcessedSent": "box 4 ddrssr action point supporting community security n identify include relevant law enforcement consideration ddr planning", "SentID": 10600 }, { "ParagraphID": 3014, - "Paragraph": "Box 4 DDR\/SSR action points for supporting community security \\n Identify and include relevant law enforcement considerations in DDR planning. Where appropriate, coordinate reintegration with police authorities to promote coherence. \\n Assess the security dynamics of returning ex-combatants. Consider whether information generated from tracking the reintegration of ex-combatants should be shared with the national police. If so, make provision for data confidentiality. \\n Consider opportunities to support joint community safety initiatives (e.g. weapons collection, community policing). \\n Support work with men and boys in violence reduction initiatives, including GBV.", + "Paragraph": "Box 4 DDR\/SSR action points for supporting community security \n Identify and include relevant law enforcement considerations in DDR planning. Where appropriate, coordinate reintegration with police authorities to promote coherence. \n Assess the security dynamics of returning ex-combatants. Consider whether information generated from tracking the reintegration of ex-combatants should be shared with the national police. If so, make provision for data confidentiality. \n Consider opportunities to support joint community safety initiatives (e.g. weapons collection, community policing). \n Support work with men and boys in violence reduction initiatives, including GBV.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190837,9 +190837,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3014, - "Paragraph": "Box 4 DDR\/SSR action points for supporting community security \\n Identify and include relevant law enforcement considerations in DDR planning. Where appropriate, coordinate reintegration with police authorities to promote coherence. \\n Assess the security dynamics of returning ex-combatants. Consider whether information generated from tracking the reintegration of ex-combatants should be shared with the national police. If so, make provision for data confidentiality. \\n Consider opportunities to support joint community safety initiatives (e.g. weapons collection, community policing). \\n Support work with men and boys in violence reduction initiatives, including GBV.", + "Paragraph": "Box 4 DDR\/SSR action points for supporting community security \n Identify and include relevant law enforcement considerations in DDR planning. Where appropriate, coordinate reintegration with police authorities to promote coherence. \n Assess the security dynamics of returning ex-combatants. Consider whether information generated from tracking the reintegration of ex-combatants should be shared with the national police. If so, make provision for data confidentiality. \n Consider opportunities to support joint community safety initiatives (e.g. weapons collection, community policing). \n Support work with men and boys in violence reduction initiatives, including GBV.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190848,16 +190848,16 @@ "Heading2": "8.4. Community security initiatives", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Assess the security dynamics of returning ex-combatants.", + "Sentence": "\n Assess the security dynamics of returning ex-combatants.", "newParagraph": "box 4 ddrssr action point supporting community security n identify include relevant law enforcement consideration ddr planning appropriate coordinate reintegration police authority promote coherence n ass security dynamic returning excombatants consider whether information generated tracking reintegration excombatants shared national police make provision data confidentiality n consider opportunity support joint community safety initiative eg weapon collection community policing n support work men boy violence reduction initiative including gbv", "ProcessedSent": "n ass security dynamic returning excombatants", "SentID": 10602 }, { "ParagraphID": 3014, - "Paragraph": "Box 4 DDR\/SSR action points for supporting community security \\n Identify and include relevant law enforcement considerations in DDR planning. Where appropriate, coordinate reintegration with police authorities to promote coherence. \\n Assess the security dynamics of returning ex-combatants. Consider whether information generated from tracking the reintegration of ex-combatants should be shared with the national police. If so, make provision for data confidentiality. \\n Consider opportunities to support joint community safety initiatives (e.g. weapons collection, community policing). \\n Support work with men and boys in violence reduction initiatives, including GBV.", + "Paragraph": "Box 4 DDR\/SSR action points for supporting community security \n Identify and include relevant law enforcement considerations in DDR planning. Where appropriate, coordinate reintegration with police authorities to promote coherence. \n Assess the security dynamics of returning ex-combatants. Consider whether information generated from tracking the reintegration of ex-combatants should be shared with the national police. If so, make provision for data confidentiality. \n Consider opportunities to support joint community safety initiatives (e.g. weapons collection, community policing). \n Support work with men and boys in violence reduction initiatives, including GBV.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190873,9 +190873,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3014, - "Paragraph": "Box 4 DDR\/SSR action points for supporting community security \\n Identify and include relevant law enforcement considerations in DDR planning. Where appropriate, coordinate reintegration with police authorities to promote coherence. \\n Assess the security dynamics of returning ex-combatants. Consider whether information generated from tracking the reintegration of ex-combatants should be shared with the national police. If so, make provision for data confidentiality. \\n Consider opportunities to support joint community safety initiatives (e.g. weapons collection, community policing). \\n Support work with men and boys in violence reduction initiatives, including GBV.", + "Paragraph": "Box 4 DDR\/SSR action points for supporting community security \n Identify and include relevant law enforcement considerations in DDR planning. Where appropriate, coordinate reintegration with police authorities to promote coherence. \n Assess the security dynamics of returning ex-combatants. Consider whether information generated from tracking the reintegration of ex-combatants should be shared with the national police. If so, make provision for data confidentiality. \n Consider opportunities to support joint community safety initiatives (e.g. weapons collection, community policing). \n Support work with men and boys in violence reduction initiatives, including GBV.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190891,9 +190891,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3014, - "Paragraph": "Box 4 DDR\/SSR action points for supporting community security \\n Identify and include relevant law enforcement considerations in DDR planning. Where appropriate, coordinate reintegration with police authorities to promote coherence. \\n Assess the security dynamics of returning ex-combatants. Consider whether information generated from tracking the reintegration of ex-combatants should be shared with the national police. If so, make provision for data confidentiality. \\n Consider opportunities to support joint community safety initiatives (e.g. weapons collection, community policing). \\n Support work with men and boys in violence reduction initiatives, including GBV.", + "Paragraph": "Box 4 DDR\/SSR action points for supporting community security \n Identify and include relevant law enforcement considerations in DDR planning. Where appropriate, coordinate reintegration with police authorities to promote coherence. \n Assess the security dynamics of returning ex-combatants. Consider whether information generated from tracking the reintegration of ex-combatants should be shared with the national police. If so, make provision for data confidentiality. \n Consider opportunities to support joint community safety initiatives (e.g. weapons collection, community policing). \n Support work with men and boys in violence reduction initiatives, including GBV.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190902,16 +190902,16 @@ "Heading2": "8.4. Community security initiatives", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Consider opportunities to support joint community safety initiatives (e.g.", + "Sentence": "\n Consider opportunities to support joint community safety initiatives (e.g.", "newParagraph": "box 4 ddrssr action point supporting community security n identify include relevant law enforcement consideration ddr planning appropriate coordinate reintegration police authority promote coherence n ass security dynamic returning excombatants consider whether information generated tracking reintegration excombatants shared national police make provision data confidentiality n consider opportunity support joint community safety initiative eg weapon collection community policing n support work men boy violence reduction initiative including gbv", "ProcessedSent": "n consider opportunity support joint community safety initiative eg", "SentID": 10605 }, { "ParagraphID": 3014, - "Paragraph": "Box 4 DDR\/SSR action points for supporting community security \\n Identify and include relevant law enforcement considerations in DDR planning. Where appropriate, coordinate reintegration with police authorities to promote coherence. \\n Assess the security dynamics of returning ex-combatants. Consider whether information generated from tracking the reintegration of ex-combatants should be shared with the national police. If so, make provision for data confidentiality. \\n Consider opportunities to support joint community safety initiatives (e.g. weapons collection, community policing). \\n Support work with men and boys in violence reduction initiatives, including GBV.", + "Paragraph": "Box 4 DDR\/SSR action points for supporting community security \n Identify and include relevant law enforcement considerations in DDR planning. Where appropriate, coordinate reintegration with police authorities to promote coherence. \n Assess the security dynamics of returning ex-combatants. Consider whether information generated from tracking the reintegration of ex-combatants should be shared with the national police. If so, make provision for data confidentiality. \n Consider opportunities to support joint community safety initiatives (e.g. weapons collection, community policing). \n Support work with men and boys in violence reduction initiatives, including GBV.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190927,9 +190927,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3014, - "Paragraph": "Box 4 DDR\/SSR action points for supporting community security \\n Identify and include relevant law enforcement considerations in DDR planning. Where appropriate, coordinate reintegration with police authorities to promote coherence. \\n Assess the security dynamics of returning ex-combatants. Consider whether information generated from tracking the reintegration of ex-combatants should be shared with the national police. If so, make provision for data confidentiality. \\n Consider opportunities to support joint community safety initiatives (e.g. weapons collection, community policing). \\n Support work with men and boys in violence reduction initiatives, including GBV.", + "Paragraph": "Box 4 DDR\/SSR action points for supporting community security \n Identify and include relevant law enforcement considerations in DDR planning. Where appropriate, coordinate reintegration with police authorities to promote coherence. \n Assess the security dynamics of returning ex-combatants. Consider whether information generated from tracking the reintegration of ex-combatants should be shared with the national police. If so, make provision for data confidentiality. \n Consider opportunities to support joint community safety initiatives (e.g. weapons collection, community policing). \n Support work with men and boys in violence reduction initiatives, including GBV.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190938,7 +190938,7 @@ "Heading2": "8.4. Community security initiatives", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Support work with men and boys in violence reduction initiatives, including GBV.", + "Sentence": "\n Support work with men and boys in violence reduction initiatives, including GBV.", "newParagraph": "box 4 ddrssr action point supporting community security n identify include relevant law enforcement consideration ddr planning appropriate coordinate reintegration police authority promote coherence n ass security dynamic returning excombatants consider whether information generated tracking reintegration excombatants shared national police make provision data confidentiality n consider opportunity support joint community safety initiative eg weapon collection community policing n support work men boy violence reduction initiative including gbv", "ProcessedSent": "n support work men boy violence reduction initiative including gbv", "SentID": 10607 @@ -190947,7 +190947,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3015, "Paragraph": "While DDR and SALW control initiatives tend to take place separately, they are linked because in practice they both seek to manage, reduce and control the availability of weapons. SALW control measures are also closely linked to SSR because they depend on the enforce- ment capacity of the police, the ability of border management bodies to restrict illicit flows of these weapons across borders as well as security sector oversight and accountability mechanisms to ensure appropriate control over national stocks.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190965,7 +190965,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3015, "Paragraph": "While DDR and SALW control initiatives tend to take place separately, they are linked because in practice they both seek to manage, reduce and control the availability of weapons. SALW control measures are also closely linked to SSR because they depend on the enforce- ment capacity of the police, the ability of border management bodies to restrict illicit flows of these weapons across borders as well as security sector oversight and accountability mechanisms to ensure appropriate control over national stocks.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -190983,7 +190983,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3016, "Paragraph": "SALW control initiatives may provide an entry point for coordinating DDR-SSR efforts. Developing linkages between national SALW Commissions and DDR\/SSR Commissions may provide one means to institutionalise coordination. To ensure potential synergies are not lost, SALW control measures should form part of joint assessments and be reflected in the design of DDR\/SSR programmes. SALW availability should be a component of conflict and security analysis (see IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration, Section 5.1.).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191001,7 +191001,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3016, "Paragraph": "SALW control initiatives may provide an entry point for coordinating DDR-SSR efforts. Developing linkages between national SALW Commissions and DDR\/SSR Commissions may provide one means to institutionalise coordination. To ensure potential synergies are not lost, SALW control measures should form part of joint assessments and be reflected in the design of DDR\/SSR programmes. SALW availability should be a component of conflict and security analysis (see IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration, Section 5.1.).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191019,7 +191019,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3016, "Paragraph": "SALW control initiatives may provide an entry point for coordinating DDR-SSR efforts. Developing linkages between national SALW Commissions and DDR\/SSR Commissions may provide one means to institutionalise coordination. To ensure potential synergies are not lost, SALW control measures should form part of joint assessments and be reflected in the design of DDR\/SSR programmes. SALW availability should be a component of conflict and security analysis (see IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration, Section 5.1.).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191037,7 +191037,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3016, "Paragraph": "SALW control initiatives may provide an entry point for coordinating DDR-SSR efforts. Developing linkages between national SALW Commissions and DDR\/SSR Commissions may provide one means to institutionalise coordination. To ensure potential synergies are not lost, SALW control measures should form part of joint assessments and be reflected in the design of DDR\/SSR programmes. SALW availability should be a component of conflict and security analysis (see IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration, Section 5.1.).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191055,7 +191055,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3016, "Paragraph": "SALW control initiatives may provide an entry point for coordinating DDR-SSR efforts. Developing linkages between national SALW Commissions and DDR\/SSR Commissions may provide one means to institutionalise coordination. To ensure potential synergies are not lost, SALW control measures should form part of joint assessments and be reflected in the design of DDR\/SSR programmes. SALW availability should be a component of conflict and security analysis (see IDDRS 4.30 on Social and Economic Reintegration, Section 5.1.).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191073,7 +191073,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3017, "Paragraph": "There is a need to understand the influence of DDR processes on the role and capacities of the private security sector and how this affects the security of communities and individuals (see Case Study Box 4). Ex-combatants are a natural target group for recruitment by pri- vate security bodies. However, the security implications of DDR activities in this area are unclear due to lack of knowledge concerning the nature, capacity, motives and the general lack of oversight and accountability of the private security sector.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191091,7 +191091,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3017, "Paragraph": "There is a need to understand the influence of DDR processes on the role and capacities of the private security sector and how this affects the security of communities and individuals (see Case Study Box 4). Ex-combatants are a natural target group for recruitment by pri- vate security bodies. However, the security implications of DDR activities in this area are unclear due to lack of knowledge concerning the nature, capacity, motives and the general lack of oversight and accountability of the private security sector.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191109,7 +191109,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3017, "Paragraph": "There is a need to understand the influence of DDR processes on the role and capacities of the private security sector and how this affects the security of communities and individuals (see Case Study Box 4). Ex-combatants are a natural target group for recruitment by pri- vate security bodies. However, the security implications of DDR activities in this area are unclear due to lack of knowledge concerning the nature, capacity, motives and the general lack of oversight and accountability of the private security sector.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191127,7 +191127,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3018, "Paragraph": "The scale and role of private security bodies should form part of evaluations of ex- combatants reintegrating into rural and urban settings in order to inform potential SSR responses. Complementary SSR initiatives may include regulation of commercial entities or practical measures at the community level to align the roles and objectives of state and non-state security providers.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191145,7 +191145,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3018, "Paragraph": "The scale and role of private security bodies should form part of evaluations of ex- combatants reintegrating into rural and urban settings in order to inform potential SSR responses. Complementary SSR initiatives may include regulation of commercial entities or practical measures at the community level to align the roles and objectives of state and non-state security providers.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191161,9 +191161,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3019, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 4 PSC regulation as an entry point for coordination \\n In Afghanistan, increasing numbers of private security companies (PSCs) have contributed to a blurring of roles with illegal armed groups. There are concerns that many ex-combatants joined the private security sector without having to give up their weapons. The heavy weapons carried by some PSCs in Afghanistan have also contributed to negative perceptions in the eyes of local populations. Laws covering PSCs have now been enacted as part of the SSR process in order to regulate the groups and their weapons. The PSC regulatory framework is linked to both the Disbandment of Illegal Armed Groups (DIAG) programme and the weapons law. The Joint Secretariat of the DIAG has contributed to the regulation of PSCs by drafting a Government Policy on Private Security Companies. PSC regulation therefore serves as a useful bridge between demilitarization and SSR activities.", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 4 PSC regulation as an entry point for coordination \n In Afghanistan, increasing numbers of private security companies (PSCs) have contributed to a blurring of roles with illegal armed groups. There are concerns that many ex-combatants joined the private security sector without having to give up their weapons. The heavy weapons carried by some PSCs in Afghanistan have also contributed to negative perceptions in the eyes of local populations. Laws covering PSCs have now been enacted as part of the SSR process in order to regulate the groups and their weapons. The PSC regulatory framework is linked to both the Disbandment of Illegal Armed Groups (DIAG) programme and the weapons law. The Joint Secretariat of the DIAG has contributed to the regulation of PSCs by drafting a Government Policy on Private Security Companies. PSC regulation therefore serves as a useful bridge between demilitarization and SSR activities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191172,16 +191172,16 @@ "Heading2": "8.6. DDR and the private security sector", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Case Study Box 4 PSC regulation as an entry point for coordination \\n In Afghanistan, increasing numbers of private security companies (PSCs) have contributed to a blurring of roles with illegal armed groups.", + "Sentence": "Case Study Box 4 PSC regulation as an entry point for coordination \n In Afghanistan, increasing numbers of private security companies (PSCs) have contributed to a blurring of roles with illegal armed groups.", "newParagraph": "case study box 4 psc regulation entry point coordination n afghanistan increasing number private security company pscs contributed blurring role illegal armed group concern many excombatants joined private security sector without give weapon heavy weapon carried pscs afghanistan also contributed negative perception eye local population law covering pscs enacted part ssr process order regulate group weapon psc regulatory framework linked disbandment illegal armed group diag programme weapon law joint secretariat diag contributed regulation pscs drafting government policy private security company psc regulation therefore serf useful bridge demilitarization ssr activity", "ProcessedSent": "case study box 4 psc regulation entry point coordination n afghanistan increasing number private security company pscs contributed blurring role illegal armed group", "SentID": 10620 }, { "ParagraphID": 3019, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 4 PSC regulation as an entry point for coordination \\n In Afghanistan, increasing numbers of private security companies (PSCs) have contributed to a blurring of roles with illegal armed groups. There are concerns that many ex-combatants joined the private security sector without having to give up their weapons. The heavy weapons carried by some PSCs in Afghanistan have also contributed to negative perceptions in the eyes of local populations. Laws covering PSCs have now been enacted as part of the SSR process in order to regulate the groups and their weapons. The PSC regulatory framework is linked to both the Disbandment of Illegal Armed Groups (DIAG) programme and the weapons law. The Joint Secretariat of the DIAG has contributed to the regulation of PSCs by drafting a Government Policy on Private Security Companies. PSC regulation therefore serves as a useful bridge between demilitarization and SSR activities.", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 4 PSC regulation as an entry point for coordination \n In Afghanistan, increasing numbers of private security companies (PSCs) have contributed to a blurring of roles with illegal armed groups. There are concerns that many ex-combatants joined the private security sector without having to give up their weapons. The heavy weapons carried by some PSCs in Afghanistan have also contributed to negative perceptions in the eyes of local populations. Laws covering PSCs have now been enacted as part of the SSR process in order to regulate the groups and their weapons. The PSC regulatory framework is linked to both the Disbandment of Illegal Armed Groups (DIAG) programme and the weapons law. The Joint Secretariat of the DIAG has contributed to the regulation of PSCs by drafting a Government Policy on Private Security Companies. PSC regulation therefore serves as a useful bridge between demilitarization and SSR activities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191197,9 +191197,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3019, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 4 PSC regulation as an entry point for coordination \\n In Afghanistan, increasing numbers of private security companies (PSCs) have contributed to a blurring of roles with illegal armed groups. There are concerns that many ex-combatants joined the private security sector without having to give up their weapons. The heavy weapons carried by some PSCs in Afghanistan have also contributed to negative perceptions in the eyes of local populations. Laws covering PSCs have now been enacted as part of the SSR process in order to regulate the groups and their weapons. The PSC regulatory framework is linked to both the Disbandment of Illegal Armed Groups (DIAG) programme and the weapons law. The Joint Secretariat of the DIAG has contributed to the regulation of PSCs by drafting a Government Policy on Private Security Companies. PSC regulation therefore serves as a useful bridge between demilitarization and SSR activities.", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 4 PSC regulation as an entry point for coordination \n In Afghanistan, increasing numbers of private security companies (PSCs) have contributed to a blurring of roles with illegal armed groups. There are concerns that many ex-combatants joined the private security sector without having to give up their weapons. The heavy weapons carried by some PSCs in Afghanistan have also contributed to negative perceptions in the eyes of local populations. Laws covering PSCs have now been enacted as part of the SSR process in order to regulate the groups and their weapons. The PSC regulatory framework is linked to both the Disbandment of Illegal Armed Groups (DIAG) programme and the weapons law. The Joint Secretariat of the DIAG has contributed to the regulation of PSCs by drafting a Government Policy on Private Security Companies. PSC regulation therefore serves as a useful bridge between demilitarization and SSR activities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191215,9 +191215,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3019, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 4 PSC regulation as an entry point for coordination \\n In Afghanistan, increasing numbers of private security companies (PSCs) have contributed to a blurring of roles with illegal armed groups. There are concerns that many ex-combatants joined the private security sector without having to give up their weapons. The heavy weapons carried by some PSCs in Afghanistan have also contributed to negative perceptions in the eyes of local populations. Laws covering PSCs have now been enacted as part of the SSR process in order to regulate the groups and their weapons. The PSC regulatory framework is linked to both the Disbandment of Illegal Armed Groups (DIAG) programme and the weapons law. The Joint Secretariat of the DIAG has contributed to the regulation of PSCs by drafting a Government Policy on Private Security Companies. PSC regulation therefore serves as a useful bridge between demilitarization and SSR activities.", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 4 PSC regulation as an entry point for coordination \n In Afghanistan, increasing numbers of private security companies (PSCs) have contributed to a blurring of roles with illegal armed groups. There are concerns that many ex-combatants joined the private security sector without having to give up their weapons. The heavy weapons carried by some PSCs in Afghanistan have also contributed to negative perceptions in the eyes of local populations. Laws covering PSCs have now been enacted as part of the SSR process in order to regulate the groups and their weapons. The PSC regulatory framework is linked to both the Disbandment of Illegal Armed Groups (DIAG) programme and the weapons law. The Joint Secretariat of the DIAG has contributed to the regulation of PSCs by drafting a Government Policy on Private Security Companies. PSC regulation therefore serves as a useful bridge between demilitarization and SSR activities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191233,9 +191233,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3019, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 4 PSC regulation as an entry point for coordination \\n In Afghanistan, increasing numbers of private security companies (PSCs) have contributed to a blurring of roles with illegal armed groups. There are concerns that many ex-combatants joined the private security sector without having to give up their weapons. The heavy weapons carried by some PSCs in Afghanistan have also contributed to negative perceptions in the eyes of local populations. Laws covering PSCs have now been enacted as part of the SSR process in order to regulate the groups and their weapons. The PSC regulatory framework is linked to both the Disbandment of Illegal Armed Groups (DIAG) programme and the weapons law. The Joint Secretariat of the DIAG has contributed to the regulation of PSCs by drafting a Government Policy on Private Security Companies. PSC regulation therefore serves as a useful bridge between demilitarization and SSR activities.", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 4 PSC regulation as an entry point for coordination \n In Afghanistan, increasing numbers of private security companies (PSCs) have contributed to a blurring of roles with illegal armed groups. There are concerns that many ex-combatants joined the private security sector without having to give up their weapons. The heavy weapons carried by some PSCs in Afghanistan have also contributed to negative perceptions in the eyes of local populations. Laws covering PSCs have now been enacted as part of the SSR process in order to regulate the groups and their weapons. The PSC regulatory framework is linked to both the Disbandment of Illegal Armed Groups (DIAG) programme and the weapons law. The Joint Secretariat of the DIAG has contributed to the regulation of PSCs by drafting a Government Policy on Private Security Companies. PSC regulation therefore serves as a useful bridge between demilitarization and SSR activities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191251,9 +191251,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3019, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 4 PSC regulation as an entry point for coordination \\n In Afghanistan, increasing numbers of private security companies (PSCs) have contributed to a blurring of roles with illegal armed groups. There are concerns that many ex-combatants joined the private security sector without having to give up their weapons. The heavy weapons carried by some PSCs in Afghanistan have also contributed to negative perceptions in the eyes of local populations. Laws covering PSCs have now been enacted as part of the SSR process in order to regulate the groups and their weapons. The PSC regulatory framework is linked to both the Disbandment of Illegal Armed Groups (DIAG) programme and the weapons law. The Joint Secretariat of the DIAG has contributed to the regulation of PSCs by drafting a Government Policy on Private Security Companies. PSC regulation therefore serves as a useful bridge between demilitarization and SSR activities.", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 4 PSC regulation as an entry point for coordination \n In Afghanistan, increasing numbers of private security companies (PSCs) have contributed to a blurring of roles with illegal armed groups. There are concerns that many ex-combatants joined the private security sector without having to give up their weapons. The heavy weapons carried by some PSCs in Afghanistan have also contributed to negative perceptions in the eyes of local populations. Laws covering PSCs have now been enacted as part of the SSR process in order to regulate the groups and their weapons. The PSC regulatory framework is linked to both the Disbandment of Illegal Armed Groups (DIAG) programme and the weapons law. The Joint Secretariat of the DIAG has contributed to the regulation of PSCs by drafting a Government Policy on Private Security Companies. PSC regulation therefore serves as a useful bridge between demilitarization and SSR activities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191269,9 +191269,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3019, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 4 PSC regulation as an entry point for coordination \\n In Afghanistan, increasing numbers of private security companies (PSCs) have contributed to a blurring of roles with illegal armed groups. There are concerns that many ex-combatants joined the private security sector without having to give up their weapons. The heavy weapons carried by some PSCs in Afghanistan have also contributed to negative perceptions in the eyes of local populations. Laws covering PSCs have now been enacted as part of the SSR process in order to regulate the groups and their weapons. The PSC regulatory framework is linked to both the Disbandment of Illegal Armed Groups (DIAG) programme and the weapons law. The Joint Secretariat of the DIAG has contributed to the regulation of PSCs by drafting a Government Policy on Private Security Companies. PSC regulation therefore serves as a useful bridge between demilitarization and SSR activities.", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 4 PSC regulation as an entry point for coordination \n In Afghanistan, increasing numbers of private security companies (PSCs) have contributed to a blurring of roles with illegal armed groups. There are concerns that many ex-combatants joined the private security sector without having to give up their weapons. The heavy weapons carried by some PSCs in Afghanistan have also contributed to negative perceptions in the eyes of local populations. Laws covering PSCs have now been enacted as part of the SSR process in order to regulate the groups and their weapons. The PSC regulatory framework is linked to both the Disbandment of Illegal Armed Groups (DIAG) programme and the weapons law. The Joint Secretariat of the DIAG has contributed to the regulation of PSCs by drafting a Government Policy on Private Security Companies. PSC regulation therefore serves as a useful bridge between demilitarization and SSR activities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191289,7 +191289,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3020, "Paragraph": "Instability is exacerbated by the flow of combatants as well as the trafficking of people, arms and other goods across porous borders. Cross-border trafficking can provide com- batants with the resource base and motivation to resist entering the DDR process. There is also a risk of re-recruitment of ex-combatants into armed groups in adjacent countries, thus undermining regional stability. Developing sustainable border management capacities can therefore enhance the effectiveness of disarmament measures, prevent the re-recruitment of foreign combatants that transit across borders and contribute to the protection of vulner- able communities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191307,7 +191307,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3020, "Paragraph": "Instability is exacerbated by the flow of combatants as well as the trafficking of people, arms and other goods across porous borders. Cross-border trafficking can provide com- batants with the resource base and motivation to resist entering the DDR process. There is also a risk of re-recruitment of ex-combatants into armed groups in adjacent countries, thus undermining regional stability. Developing sustainable border management capacities can therefore enhance the effectiveness of disarmament measures, prevent the re-recruitment of foreign combatants that transit across borders and contribute to the protection of vulner- able communities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191325,7 +191325,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3020, "Paragraph": "Instability is exacerbated by the flow of combatants as well as the trafficking of people, arms and other goods across porous borders. Cross-border trafficking can provide com- batants with the resource base and motivation to resist entering the DDR process. There is also a risk of re-recruitment of ex-combatants into armed groups in adjacent countries, thus undermining regional stability. Developing sustainable border management capacities can therefore enhance the effectiveness of disarmament measures, prevent the re-recruitment of foreign combatants that transit across borders and contribute to the protection of vulner- able communities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191343,7 +191343,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3020, "Paragraph": "Instability is exacerbated by the flow of combatants as well as the trafficking of people, arms and other goods across porous borders. Cross-border trafficking can provide com- batants with the resource base and motivation to resist entering the DDR process. There is also a risk of re-recruitment of ex-combatants into armed groups in adjacent countries, thus undermining regional stability. Developing sustainable border management capacities can therefore enhance the effectiveness of disarmament measures, prevent the re-recruitment of foreign combatants that transit across borders and contribute to the protection of vulner- able communities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191361,7 +191361,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3021, "Paragraph": "Training and capacity building activities should acknowledge linkages between DDR and border security. Where appropriate, conflict and security analysis should address re- gional security considerations including cross-border flows of combatants in order to coor- dinate responses with border security authorities. At the same time, adequate options and opportunities should be open to ex-combatants in case they are intercepted at the border. Lack of logistics and personnel capacity as well as inaccessibility of border areas can pose major challenges that should be addressed through complementary SSR activities. SALW projects may also benefit from coordination with border management programmes.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191379,7 +191379,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3021, "Paragraph": "Training and capacity building activities should acknowledge linkages between DDR and border security. Where appropriate, conflict and security analysis should address re- gional security considerations including cross-border flows of combatants in order to coor- dinate responses with border security authorities. At the same time, adequate options and opportunities should be open to ex-combatants in case they are intercepted at the border. Lack of logistics and personnel capacity as well as inaccessibility of border areas can pose major challenges that should be addressed through complementary SSR activities. SALW projects may also benefit from coordination with border management programmes.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191397,7 +191397,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3021, "Paragraph": "Training and capacity building activities should acknowledge linkages between DDR and border security. Where appropriate, conflict and security analysis should address re- gional security considerations including cross-border flows of combatants in order to coor- dinate responses with border security authorities. At the same time, adequate options and opportunities should be open to ex-combatants in case they are intercepted at the border. Lack of logistics and personnel capacity as well as inaccessibility of border areas can pose major challenges that should be addressed through complementary SSR activities. SALW projects may also benefit from coordination with border management programmes.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191415,7 +191415,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3021, "Paragraph": "Training and capacity building activities should acknowledge linkages between DDR and border security. Where appropriate, conflict and security analysis should address re- gional security considerations including cross-border flows of combatants in order to coor- dinate responses with border security authorities. At the same time, adequate options and opportunities should be open to ex-combatants in case they are intercepted at the border. Lack of logistics and personnel capacity as well as inaccessibility of border areas can pose major challenges that should be addressed through complementary SSR activities. SALW projects may also benefit from coordination with border management programmes.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191433,7 +191433,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3021, "Paragraph": "Training and capacity building activities should acknowledge linkages between DDR and border security. Where appropriate, conflict and security analysis should address re- gional security considerations including cross-border flows of combatants in order to coor- dinate responses with border security authorities. At the same time, adequate options and opportunities should be open to ex-combatants in case they are intercepted at the border. Lack of logistics and personnel capacity as well as inaccessibility of border areas can pose major challenges that should be addressed through complementary SSR activities. SALW projects may also benefit from coordination with border management programmes.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191451,7 +191451,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3022, "Paragraph": "DDR and related programmes should be mutually supportive and integrated within a common framework (see IDDRS 3.20 on DDR Programme Design). This section proposes ways to appropriately integrate SSR concerns into DDR assessments, programme design, monitoring and evaluation (9.1-9.3). To avoid unrealistic and counter-productive approaches, decisions on how to sequence activities should be tailored to context-specific security, political and socio-economic factors. Entry points are therefore identified where DDR\/SSR concerns may be usefully considered (9.4).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191469,7 +191469,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3022, "Paragraph": "DDR and related programmes should be mutually supportive and integrated within a common framework (see IDDRS 3.20 on DDR Programme Design). This section proposes ways to appropriately integrate SSR concerns into DDR assessments, programme design, monitoring and evaluation (9.1-9.3). To avoid unrealistic and counter-productive approaches, decisions on how to sequence activities should be tailored to context-specific security, political and socio-economic factors. Entry points are therefore identified where DDR\/SSR concerns may be usefully considered (9.4).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191487,7 +191487,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3022, "Paragraph": "DDR and related programmes should be mutually supportive and integrated within a common framework (see IDDRS 3.20 on DDR Programme Design). This section proposes ways to appropriately integrate SSR concerns into DDR assessments, programme design, monitoring and evaluation (9.1-9.3). To avoid unrealistic and counter-productive approaches, decisions on how to sequence activities should be tailored to context-specific security, political and socio-economic factors. Entry points are therefore identified where DDR\/SSR concerns may be usefully considered (9.4).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191505,7 +191505,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3022, "Paragraph": "DDR and related programmes should be mutually supportive and integrated within a common framework (see IDDRS 3.20 on DDR Programme Design). This section proposes ways to appropriately integrate SSR concerns into DDR assessments, programme design, monitoring and evaluation (9.1-9.3). To avoid unrealistic and counter-productive approaches, decisions on how to sequence activities should be tailored to context-specific security, political and socio-economic factors. Entry points are therefore identified where DDR\/SSR concerns may be usefully considered (9.4).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191523,7 +191523,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3023, "Paragraph": "Needs assessments are undertaken periodically in order to help planners and programmers understand progress and undertake appropriate course corrections. During the period prior to the development of a DDR programme, assessments can have the dual purpose of identifying programming options and providing guidance for DDR-related input into peace agreements", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191541,7 +191541,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3023, "Paragraph": "Needs assessments are undertaken periodically in order to help planners and programmers understand progress and undertake appropriate course corrections. During the period prior to the development of a DDR programme, assessments can have the dual purpose of identifying programming options and providing guidance for DDR-related input into peace agreements", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191559,7 +191559,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3024, "Paragraph": "While DDR specialists should be included in integrated assessments that situate DDR within broader UN and national planning (see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning) this should also be a regular practice for SSR. Promoting joint assessments through includ- ing representatives of other relevant bilateral\/multilateral actors should also be encouraged to enhance coherence and reduce duplication. In designing DDR assessments, SSR con- siderations should be reflected in ToRs, the composition of assessment teams and in the knowledge gathered during assessment missions (see Box 5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191577,7 +191577,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3024, "Paragraph": "While DDR specialists should be included in integrated assessments that situate DDR within broader UN and national planning (see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning) this should also be a regular practice for SSR. Promoting joint assessments through includ- ing representatives of other relevant bilateral\/multilateral actors should also be encouraged to enhance coherence and reduce duplication. In designing DDR assessments, SSR con- siderations should be reflected in ToRs, the composition of assessment teams and in the knowledge gathered during assessment missions (see Box 5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191595,7 +191595,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3024, "Paragraph": "While DDR specialists should be included in integrated assessments that situate DDR within broader UN and national planning (see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning) this should also be a regular practice for SSR. Promoting joint assessments through includ- ing representatives of other relevant bilateral\/multilateral actors should also be encouraged to enhance coherence and reduce duplication. In designing DDR assessments, SSR con- siderations should be reflected in ToRs, the composition of assessment teams and in the knowledge gathered during assessment missions (see Box 5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191611,10 +191611,10 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3025, - "Paragraph": "Box 5 Designing SSR-sensitive assessments \\n Developing the terms of reference \u2013 Terms of reference (ToRs) for DDR assessments should include the need to consider potential synergies between DDR and SSR that can be identified and fed into planning processes. Draft ToRs should be shared between relevant DDR and SSR focal points to ensure that all relevant and cross-cutting issues are considered. The ToRs should also set out the composition of the assessment team. \\n Composing the assessment team \u2013 Assessment teams should be multi-sectoral and include experts or focal points from related fields that are linked to the DDR process. The inclusion of SSR expertise represents an important way of creating an informed view on the relationship between DDR and SSR. In providing inputs to more general assessments, broad expertise on the political and integrated nature of an SSR process may be more important than sector-specific knowledge. Where appropriate, experts from relevant bilateral\/multilateral actors should also be included. Including host state nationals or experts from the region within assessment teams will improve contextual understanding and awareness of local sensitivities and demonstrate a commitment to national ownership. Inclusion of team members with appropriate local language skills is essential. \\n Information gathering \u2013 Knowledge should be captured on SSR-relevant issues in a given context. It is important to engage with representatives of local communities including non-state and community-based security providers. This will help clarify community perceptions of security provision and vulnerabilities and identify the potential for tensions when ex-combatants are reintegrated into communities, including how this may be tied to weapons availability.", - "Color": null, - "Level": null, - "LevelName": null, + "Paragraph": "Box 5 Designing SSR-sensitive assessments \n Developing the terms of reference \u2013 Terms of reference (ToRs) for DDR assessments should include the need to consider potential synergies between DDR and SSR that can be identified and fed into planning processes. Draft ToRs should be shared between relevant DDR and SSR focal points to ensure that all relevant and cross-cutting issues are considered. The ToRs should also set out the composition of the assessment team. \n Composing the assessment team \u2013 Assessment teams should be multi-sectoral and include experts or focal points from related fields that are linked to the DDR process. The inclusion of SSR expertise represents an important way of creating an informed view on the relationship between DDR and SSR. In providing inputs to more general assessments, broad expertise on the political and integrated nature of an SSR process may be more important than sector-specific knowledge. Where appropriate, experts from relevant bilateral\/multilateral actors should also be included. Including host state nationals or experts from the region within assessment teams will improve contextual understanding and awareness of local sensitivities and demonstrate a commitment to national ownership. Inclusion of team members with appropriate local language skills is essential. \n Information gathering \u2013 Knowledge should be captured on SSR-relevant issues in a given context. It is important to engage with representatives of local communities including non-state and community-based security providers. This will help clarify community perceptions of security provision and vulnerabilities and identify the potential for tensions when ex-combatants are reintegrated into communities, including how this may be tied to weapons availability.", + "Color": "#CF7AB2", + "Level": 6, + "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", "PageNum": 17, @@ -191622,17 +191622,17 @@ "Heading2": "9.1. SSR-sensitive assessments", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Box 5 Designing SSR-sensitive assessments \\n Developing the terms of reference \u2013 Terms of reference (ToRs) for DDR assessments should include the need to consider potential synergies between DDR and SSR that can be identified and fed into planning processes.", + "Sentence": "Box 5 Designing SSR-sensitive assessments \n Developing the terms of reference \u2013 Terms of reference (ToRs) for DDR assessments should include the need to consider potential synergies between DDR and SSR that can be identified and fed into planning processes.", "newParagraph": "box 5 designing ssrsensitive assessment n developing term reference term reference tor ddr assessment include need consider potential synergy ddr ssr identified fed planning process draft tor shared relevant ddr ssr focal point ensure relevant crosscutting issue considered tor also set composition assessment team n composing assessment team assessment team multisectoral include expert focal point related field linked ddr process inclusion ssr expertise represents important way creating informed view relationship ddr ssr providing input general assessment broad expertise political integrated nature ssr process may important sectorspecific knowledge appropriate expert relevant bilateralmultilateral actor also included including host state national expert region within assessment team improve contextual understanding awareness local sensitivity demonstrate commitment national ownership inclusion team member appropriate local language skill essential n information gathering knowledge captured ssrrelevant issue given context important engage representative local community including nonstate communitybased security provider help clarify community perception security provision vulnerability identify potential tension excombatants reintegrated community including may tied weapon availability", "ProcessedSent": "box 5 designing ssrsensitive assessment n developing term reference term reference tor ddr assessment include need consider potential synergy ddr ssr identified fed planning process", "SentID": 10645 }, { "ParagraphID": 3025, - "Paragraph": "Box 5 Designing SSR-sensitive assessments \\n Developing the terms of reference \u2013 Terms of reference (ToRs) for DDR assessments should include the need to consider potential synergies between DDR and SSR that can be identified and fed into planning processes. Draft ToRs should be shared between relevant DDR and SSR focal points to ensure that all relevant and cross-cutting issues are considered. The ToRs should also set out the composition of the assessment team. \\n Composing the assessment team \u2013 Assessment teams should be multi-sectoral and include experts or focal points from related fields that are linked to the DDR process. The inclusion of SSR expertise represents an important way of creating an informed view on the relationship between DDR and SSR. In providing inputs to more general assessments, broad expertise on the political and integrated nature of an SSR process may be more important than sector-specific knowledge. Where appropriate, experts from relevant bilateral\/multilateral actors should also be included. Including host state nationals or experts from the region within assessment teams will improve contextual understanding and awareness of local sensitivities and demonstrate a commitment to national ownership. Inclusion of team members with appropriate local language skills is essential. \\n Information gathering \u2013 Knowledge should be captured on SSR-relevant issues in a given context. It is important to engage with representatives of local communities including non-state and community-based security providers. This will help clarify community perceptions of security provision and vulnerabilities and identify the potential for tensions when ex-combatants are reintegrated into communities, including how this may be tied to weapons availability.", - "Color": null, - "Level": null, - "LevelName": null, + "Paragraph": "Box 5 Designing SSR-sensitive assessments \n Developing the terms of reference \u2013 Terms of reference (ToRs) for DDR assessments should include the need to consider potential synergies between DDR and SSR that can be identified and fed into planning processes. Draft ToRs should be shared between relevant DDR and SSR focal points to ensure that all relevant and cross-cutting issues are considered. The ToRs should also set out the composition of the assessment team. \n Composing the assessment team \u2013 Assessment teams should be multi-sectoral and include experts or focal points from related fields that are linked to the DDR process. The inclusion of SSR expertise represents an important way of creating an informed view on the relationship between DDR and SSR. In providing inputs to more general assessments, broad expertise on the political and integrated nature of an SSR process may be more important than sector-specific knowledge. Where appropriate, experts from relevant bilateral\/multilateral actors should also be included. Including host state nationals or experts from the region within assessment teams will improve contextual understanding and awareness of local sensitivities and demonstrate a commitment to national ownership. Inclusion of team members with appropriate local language skills is essential. \n Information gathering \u2013 Knowledge should be captured on SSR-relevant issues in a given context. It is important to engage with representatives of local communities including non-state and community-based security providers. This will help clarify community perceptions of security provision and vulnerabilities and identify the potential for tensions when ex-combatants are reintegrated into communities, including how this may be tied to weapons availability.", + "Color": "#CF7AB2", + "Level": 6, + "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", "PageNum": 17, @@ -191647,10 +191647,10 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3025, - "Paragraph": "Box 5 Designing SSR-sensitive assessments \\n Developing the terms of reference \u2013 Terms of reference (ToRs) for DDR assessments should include the need to consider potential synergies between DDR and SSR that can be identified and fed into planning processes. Draft ToRs should be shared between relevant DDR and SSR focal points to ensure that all relevant and cross-cutting issues are considered. The ToRs should also set out the composition of the assessment team. \\n Composing the assessment team \u2013 Assessment teams should be multi-sectoral and include experts or focal points from related fields that are linked to the DDR process. The inclusion of SSR expertise represents an important way of creating an informed view on the relationship between DDR and SSR. In providing inputs to more general assessments, broad expertise on the political and integrated nature of an SSR process may be more important than sector-specific knowledge. Where appropriate, experts from relevant bilateral\/multilateral actors should also be included. Including host state nationals or experts from the region within assessment teams will improve contextual understanding and awareness of local sensitivities and demonstrate a commitment to national ownership. Inclusion of team members with appropriate local language skills is essential. \\n Information gathering \u2013 Knowledge should be captured on SSR-relevant issues in a given context. It is important to engage with representatives of local communities including non-state and community-based security providers. This will help clarify community perceptions of security provision and vulnerabilities and identify the potential for tensions when ex-combatants are reintegrated into communities, including how this may be tied to weapons availability.", - "Color": null, - "Level": null, - "LevelName": null, + "Paragraph": "Box 5 Designing SSR-sensitive assessments \n Developing the terms of reference \u2013 Terms of reference (ToRs) for DDR assessments should include the need to consider potential synergies between DDR and SSR that can be identified and fed into planning processes. Draft ToRs should be shared between relevant DDR and SSR focal points to ensure that all relevant and cross-cutting issues are considered. The ToRs should also set out the composition of the assessment team. \n Composing the assessment team \u2013 Assessment teams should be multi-sectoral and include experts or focal points from related fields that are linked to the DDR process. The inclusion of SSR expertise represents an important way of creating an informed view on the relationship between DDR and SSR. In providing inputs to more general assessments, broad expertise on the political and integrated nature of an SSR process may be more important than sector-specific knowledge. Where appropriate, experts from relevant bilateral\/multilateral actors should also be included. Including host state nationals or experts from the region within assessment teams will improve contextual understanding and awareness of local sensitivities and demonstrate a commitment to national ownership. Inclusion of team members with appropriate local language skills is essential. \n Information gathering \u2013 Knowledge should be captured on SSR-relevant issues in a given context. It is important to engage with representatives of local communities including non-state and community-based security providers. This will help clarify community perceptions of security provision and vulnerabilities and identify the potential for tensions when ex-combatants are reintegrated into communities, including how this may be tied to weapons availability.", + "Color": "#CF7AB2", + "Level": 6, + "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", "PageNum": 17, @@ -191665,10 +191665,10 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3025, - "Paragraph": "Box 5 Designing SSR-sensitive assessments \\n Developing the terms of reference \u2013 Terms of reference (ToRs) for DDR assessments should include the need to consider potential synergies between DDR and SSR that can be identified and fed into planning processes. Draft ToRs should be shared between relevant DDR and SSR focal points to ensure that all relevant and cross-cutting issues are considered. The ToRs should also set out the composition of the assessment team. \\n Composing the assessment team \u2013 Assessment teams should be multi-sectoral and include experts or focal points from related fields that are linked to the DDR process. The inclusion of SSR expertise represents an important way of creating an informed view on the relationship between DDR and SSR. In providing inputs to more general assessments, broad expertise on the political and integrated nature of an SSR process may be more important than sector-specific knowledge. Where appropriate, experts from relevant bilateral\/multilateral actors should also be included. Including host state nationals or experts from the region within assessment teams will improve contextual understanding and awareness of local sensitivities and demonstrate a commitment to national ownership. Inclusion of team members with appropriate local language skills is essential. \\n Information gathering \u2013 Knowledge should be captured on SSR-relevant issues in a given context. It is important to engage with representatives of local communities including non-state and community-based security providers. This will help clarify community perceptions of security provision and vulnerabilities and identify the potential for tensions when ex-combatants are reintegrated into communities, including how this may be tied to weapons availability.", - "Color": null, - "Level": null, - "LevelName": null, + "Paragraph": "Box 5 Designing SSR-sensitive assessments \n Developing the terms of reference \u2013 Terms of reference (ToRs) for DDR assessments should include the need to consider potential synergies between DDR and SSR that can be identified and fed into planning processes. Draft ToRs should be shared between relevant DDR and SSR focal points to ensure that all relevant and cross-cutting issues are considered. The ToRs should also set out the composition of the assessment team. \n Composing the assessment team \u2013 Assessment teams should be multi-sectoral and include experts or focal points from related fields that are linked to the DDR process. The inclusion of SSR expertise represents an important way of creating an informed view on the relationship between DDR and SSR. In providing inputs to more general assessments, broad expertise on the political and integrated nature of an SSR process may be more important than sector-specific knowledge. Where appropriate, experts from relevant bilateral\/multilateral actors should also be included. Including host state nationals or experts from the region within assessment teams will improve contextual understanding and awareness of local sensitivities and demonstrate a commitment to national ownership. Inclusion of team members with appropriate local language skills is essential. \n Information gathering \u2013 Knowledge should be captured on SSR-relevant issues in a given context. It is important to engage with representatives of local communities including non-state and community-based security providers. This will help clarify community perceptions of security provision and vulnerabilities and identify the potential for tensions when ex-combatants are reintegrated into communities, including how this may be tied to weapons availability.", + "Color": "#CF7AB2", + "Level": 6, + "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", "PageNum": 17, @@ -191676,17 +191676,17 @@ "Heading2": "9.1. SSR-sensitive assessments", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Composing the assessment team \u2013 Assessment teams should be multi-sectoral and include experts or focal points from related fields that are linked to the DDR process.", + "Sentence": "Composing the assessment team \u2013 Assessment teams should be multi-sectoral and include experts or focal points from related fields that are linked to the DDR process.", "newParagraph": "box 5 designing ssrsensitive assessment n developing term reference term reference tor ddr assessment include need consider potential synergy ddr ssr identified fed planning process draft tor shared relevant ddr ssr focal point ensure relevant crosscutting issue considered tor also set composition assessment team n composing assessment team assessment team multisectoral include expert focal point related field linked ddr process inclusion ssr expertise represents important way creating informed view relationship ddr ssr providing input general assessment broad expertise political integrated nature ssr process may important sectorspecific knowledge appropriate expert relevant bilateralmultilateral actor also included including host state national expert region within assessment team improve contextual understanding awareness local sensitivity demonstrate commitment national ownership inclusion team member appropriate local language skill essential n information gathering knowledge captured ssrrelevant issue given context important engage representative local community including nonstate communitybased security provider help clarify community perception security provision vulnerability identify potential tension excombatants reintegrated community including may tied weapon availability", "ProcessedSent": "n composing assessment team assessment team multisectoral include expert focal point related field linked ddr process", "SentID": 10648 }, { "ParagraphID": 3025, - "Paragraph": "Box 5 Designing SSR-sensitive assessments \\n Developing the terms of reference \u2013 Terms of reference (ToRs) for DDR assessments should include the need to consider potential synergies between DDR and SSR that can be identified and fed into planning processes. Draft ToRs should be shared between relevant DDR and SSR focal points to ensure that all relevant and cross-cutting issues are considered. The ToRs should also set out the composition of the assessment team. \\n Composing the assessment team \u2013 Assessment teams should be multi-sectoral and include experts or focal points from related fields that are linked to the DDR process. The inclusion of SSR expertise represents an important way of creating an informed view on the relationship between DDR and SSR. In providing inputs to more general assessments, broad expertise on the political and integrated nature of an SSR process may be more important than sector-specific knowledge. Where appropriate, experts from relevant bilateral\/multilateral actors should also be included. Including host state nationals or experts from the region within assessment teams will improve contextual understanding and awareness of local sensitivities and demonstrate a commitment to national ownership. Inclusion of team members with appropriate local language skills is essential. \\n Information gathering \u2013 Knowledge should be captured on SSR-relevant issues in a given context. It is important to engage with representatives of local communities including non-state and community-based security providers. This will help clarify community perceptions of security provision and vulnerabilities and identify the potential for tensions when ex-combatants are reintegrated into communities, including how this may be tied to weapons availability.", - "Color": null, - "Level": null, - "LevelName": null, + "Paragraph": "Box 5 Designing SSR-sensitive assessments \n Developing the terms of reference \u2013 Terms of reference (ToRs) for DDR assessments should include the need to consider potential synergies between DDR and SSR that can be identified and fed into planning processes. Draft ToRs should be shared between relevant DDR and SSR focal points to ensure that all relevant and cross-cutting issues are considered. The ToRs should also set out the composition of the assessment team. \n Composing the assessment team \u2013 Assessment teams should be multi-sectoral and include experts or focal points from related fields that are linked to the DDR process. The inclusion of SSR expertise represents an important way of creating an informed view on the relationship between DDR and SSR. In providing inputs to more general assessments, broad expertise on the political and integrated nature of an SSR process may be more important than sector-specific knowledge. Where appropriate, experts from relevant bilateral\/multilateral actors should also be included. Including host state nationals or experts from the region within assessment teams will improve contextual understanding and awareness of local sensitivities and demonstrate a commitment to national ownership. Inclusion of team members with appropriate local language skills is essential. \n Information gathering \u2013 Knowledge should be captured on SSR-relevant issues in a given context. It is important to engage with representatives of local communities including non-state and community-based security providers. This will help clarify community perceptions of security provision and vulnerabilities and identify the potential for tensions when ex-combatants are reintegrated into communities, including how this may be tied to weapons availability.", + "Color": "#CF7AB2", + "Level": 6, + "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", "PageNum": 17, @@ -191701,10 +191701,10 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3025, - "Paragraph": "Box 5 Designing SSR-sensitive assessments \\n Developing the terms of reference \u2013 Terms of reference (ToRs) for DDR assessments should include the need to consider potential synergies between DDR and SSR that can be identified and fed into planning processes. Draft ToRs should be shared between relevant DDR and SSR focal points to ensure that all relevant and cross-cutting issues are considered. The ToRs should also set out the composition of the assessment team. \\n Composing the assessment team \u2013 Assessment teams should be multi-sectoral and include experts or focal points from related fields that are linked to the DDR process. The inclusion of SSR expertise represents an important way of creating an informed view on the relationship between DDR and SSR. In providing inputs to more general assessments, broad expertise on the political and integrated nature of an SSR process may be more important than sector-specific knowledge. Where appropriate, experts from relevant bilateral\/multilateral actors should also be included. Including host state nationals or experts from the region within assessment teams will improve contextual understanding and awareness of local sensitivities and demonstrate a commitment to national ownership. Inclusion of team members with appropriate local language skills is essential. \\n Information gathering \u2013 Knowledge should be captured on SSR-relevant issues in a given context. It is important to engage with representatives of local communities including non-state and community-based security providers. This will help clarify community perceptions of security provision and vulnerabilities and identify the potential for tensions when ex-combatants are reintegrated into communities, including how this may be tied to weapons availability.", - "Color": null, - "Level": null, - "LevelName": null, + "Paragraph": "Box 5 Designing SSR-sensitive assessments \n Developing the terms of reference \u2013 Terms of reference (ToRs) for DDR assessments should include the need to consider potential synergies between DDR and SSR that can be identified and fed into planning processes. Draft ToRs should be shared between relevant DDR and SSR focal points to ensure that all relevant and cross-cutting issues are considered. The ToRs should also set out the composition of the assessment team. \n Composing the assessment team \u2013 Assessment teams should be multi-sectoral and include experts or focal points from related fields that are linked to the DDR process. The inclusion of SSR expertise represents an important way of creating an informed view on the relationship between DDR and SSR. In providing inputs to more general assessments, broad expertise on the political and integrated nature of an SSR process may be more important than sector-specific knowledge. Where appropriate, experts from relevant bilateral\/multilateral actors should also be included. Including host state nationals or experts from the region within assessment teams will improve contextual understanding and awareness of local sensitivities and demonstrate a commitment to national ownership. Inclusion of team members with appropriate local language skills is essential. \n Information gathering \u2013 Knowledge should be captured on SSR-relevant issues in a given context. It is important to engage with representatives of local communities including non-state and community-based security providers. This will help clarify community perceptions of security provision and vulnerabilities and identify the potential for tensions when ex-combatants are reintegrated into communities, including how this may be tied to weapons availability.", + "Color": "#CF7AB2", + "Level": 6, + "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", "PageNum": 17, @@ -191719,10 +191719,10 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3025, - "Paragraph": "Box 5 Designing SSR-sensitive assessments \\n Developing the terms of reference \u2013 Terms of reference (ToRs) for DDR assessments should include the need to consider potential synergies between DDR and SSR that can be identified and fed into planning processes. Draft ToRs should be shared between relevant DDR and SSR focal points to ensure that all relevant and cross-cutting issues are considered. The ToRs should also set out the composition of the assessment team. \\n Composing the assessment team \u2013 Assessment teams should be multi-sectoral and include experts or focal points from related fields that are linked to the DDR process. The inclusion of SSR expertise represents an important way of creating an informed view on the relationship between DDR and SSR. In providing inputs to more general assessments, broad expertise on the political and integrated nature of an SSR process may be more important than sector-specific knowledge. Where appropriate, experts from relevant bilateral\/multilateral actors should also be included. Including host state nationals or experts from the region within assessment teams will improve contextual understanding and awareness of local sensitivities and demonstrate a commitment to national ownership. Inclusion of team members with appropriate local language skills is essential. \\n Information gathering \u2013 Knowledge should be captured on SSR-relevant issues in a given context. It is important to engage with representatives of local communities including non-state and community-based security providers. This will help clarify community perceptions of security provision and vulnerabilities and identify the potential for tensions when ex-combatants are reintegrated into communities, including how this may be tied to weapons availability.", - "Color": null, - "Level": null, - "LevelName": null, + "Paragraph": "Box 5 Designing SSR-sensitive assessments \n Developing the terms of reference \u2013 Terms of reference (ToRs) for DDR assessments should include the need to consider potential synergies between DDR and SSR that can be identified and fed into planning processes. Draft ToRs should be shared between relevant DDR and SSR focal points to ensure that all relevant and cross-cutting issues are considered. The ToRs should also set out the composition of the assessment team. \n Composing the assessment team \u2013 Assessment teams should be multi-sectoral and include experts or focal points from related fields that are linked to the DDR process. The inclusion of SSR expertise represents an important way of creating an informed view on the relationship between DDR and SSR. In providing inputs to more general assessments, broad expertise on the political and integrated nature of an SSR process may be more important than sector-specific knowledge. Where appropriate, experts from relevant bilateral\/multilateral actors should also be included. Including host state nationals or experts from the region within assessment teams will improve contextual understanding and awareness of local sensitivities and demonstrate a commitment to national ownership. Inclusion of team members with appropriate local language skills is essential. \n Information gathering \u2013 Knowledge should be captured on SSR-relevant issues in a given context. It is important to engage with representatives of local communities including non-state and community-based security providers. This will help clarify community perceptions of security provision and vulnerabilities and identify the potential for tensions when ex-combatants are reintegrated into communities, including how this may be tied to weapons availability.", + "Color": "#CF7AB2", + "Level": 6, + "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", "PageNum": 17, @@ -191737,10 +191737,10 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3025, - "Paragraph": "Box 5 Designing SSR-sensitive assessments \\n Developing the terms of reference \u2013 Terms of reference (ToRs) for DDR assessments should include the need to consider potential synergies between DDR and SSR that can be identified and fed into planning processes. Draft ToRs should be shared between relevant DDR and SSR focal points to ensure that all relevant and cross-cutting issues are considered. The ToRs should also set out the composition of the assessment team. \\n Composing the assessment team \u2013 Assessment teams should be multi-sectoral and include experts or focal points from related fields that are linked to the DDR process. The inclusion of SSR expertise represents an important way of creating an informed view on the relationship between DDR and SSR. In providing inputs to more general assessments, broad expertise on the political and integrated nature of an SSR process may be more important than sector-specific knowledge. Where appropriate, experts from relevant bilateral\/multilateral actors should also be included. Including host state nationals or experts from the region within assessment teams will improve contextual understanding and awareness of local sensitivities and demonstrate a commitment to national ownership. Inclusion of team members with appropriate local language skills is essential. \\n Information gathering \u2013 Knowledge should be captured on SSR-relevant issues in a given context. It is important to engage with representatives of local communities including non-state and community-based security providers. This will help clarify community perceptions of security provision and vulnerabilities and identify the potential for tensions when ex-combatants are reintegrated into communities, including how this may be tied to weapons availability.", - "Color": null, - "Level": null, - "LevelName": null, + "Paragraph": "Box 5 Designing SSR-sensitive assessments \n Developing the terms of reference \u2013 Terms of reference (ToRs) for DDR assessments should include the need to consider potential synergies between DDR and SSR that can be identified and fed into planning processes. Draft ToRs should be shared between relevant DDR and SSR focal points to ensure that all relevant and cross-cutting issues are considered. The ToRs should also set out the composition of the assessment team. \n Composing the assessment team \u2013 Assessment teams should be multi-sectoral and include experts or focal points from related fields that are linked to the DDR process. The inclusion of SSR expertise represents an important way of creating an informed view on the relationship between DDR and SSR. In providing inputs to more general assessments, broad expertise on the political and integrated nature of an SSR process may be more important than sector-specific knowledge. Where appropriate, experts from relevant bilateral\/multilateral actors should also be included. Including host state nationals or experts from the region within assessment teams will improve contextual understanding and awareness of local sensitivities and demonstrate a commitment to national ownership. Inclusion of team members with appropriate local language skills is essential. \n Information gathering \u2013 Knowledge should be captured on SSR-relevant issues in a given context. It is important to engage with representatives of local communities including non-state and community-based security providers. This will help clarify community perceptions of security provision and vulnerabilities and identify the potential for tensions when ex-combatants are reintegrated into communities, including how this may be tied to weapons availability.", + "Color": "#CF7AB2", + "Level": 6, + "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", "PageNum": 17, @@ -191755,10 +191755,10 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3025, - "Paragraph": "Box 5 Designing SSR-sensitive assessments \\n Developing the terms of reference \u2013 Terms of reference (ToRs) for DDR assessments should include the need to consider potential synergies between DDR and SSR that can be identified and fed into planning processes. Draft ToRs should be shared between relevant DDR and SSR focal points to ensure that all relevant and cross-cutting issues are considered. The ToRs should also set out the composition of the assessment team. \\n Composing the assessment team \u2013 Assessment teams should be multi-sectoral and include experts or focal points from related fields that are linked to the DDR process. The inclusion of SSR expertise represents an important way of creating an informed view on the relationship between DDR and SSR. In providing inputs to more general assessments, broad expertise on the political and integrated nature of an SSR process may be more important than sector-specific knowledge. Where appropriate, experts from relevant bilateral\/multilateral actors should also be included. Including host state nationals or experts from the region within assessment teams will improve contextual understanding and awareness of local sensitivities and demonstrate a commitment to national ownership. Inclusion of team members with appropriate local language skills is essential. \\n Information gathering \u2013 Knowledge should be captured on SSR-relevant issues in a given context. It is important to engage with representatives of local communities including non-state and community-based security providers. This will help clarify community perceptions of security provision and vulnerabilities and identify the potential for tensions when ex-combatants are reintegrated into communities, including how this may be tied to weapons availability.", - "Color": null, - "Level": null, - "LevelName": null, + "Paragraph": "Box 5 Designing SSR-sensitive assessments \n Developing the terms of reference \u2013 Terms of reference (ToRs) for DDR assessments should include the need to consider potential synergies between DDR and SSR that can be identified and fed into planning processes. Draft ToRs should be shared between relevant DDR and SSR focal points to ensure that all relevant and cross-cutting issues are considered. The ToRs should also set out the composition of the assessment team. \n Composing the assessment team \u2013 Assessment teams should be multi-sectoral and include experts or focal points from related fields that are linked to the DDR process. The inclusion of SSR expertise represents an important way of creating an informed view on the relationship between DDR and SSR. In providing inputs to more general assessments, broad expertise on the political and integrated nature of an SSR process may be more important than sector-specific knowledge. Where appropriate, experts from relevant bilateral\/multilateral actors should also be included. Including host state nationals or experts from the region within assessment teams will improve contextual understanding and awareness of local sensitivities and demonstrate a commitment to national ownership. Inclusion of team members with appropriate local language skills is essential. \n Information gathering \u2013 Knowledge should be captured on SSR-relevant issues in a given context. It is important to engage with representatives of local communities including non-state and community-based security providers. This will help clarify community perceptions of security provision and vulnerabilities and identify the potential for tensions when ex-combatants are reintegrated into communities, including how this may be tied to weapons availability.", + "Color": "#CF7AB2", + "Level": 6, + "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", "PageNum": 17, @@ -191773,10 +191773,10 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3025, - "Paragraph": "Box 5 Designing SSR-sensitive assessments \\n Developing the terms of reference \u2013 Terms of reference (ToRs) for DDR assessments should include the need to consider potential synergies between DDR and SSR that can be identified and fed into planning processes. Draft ToRs should be shared between relevant DDR and SSR focal points to ensure that all relevant and cross-cutting issues are considered. The ToRs should also set out the composition of the assessment team. \\n Composing the assessment team \u2013 Assessment teams should be multi-sectoral and include experts or focal points from related fields that are linked to the DDR process. The inclusion of SSR expertise represents an important way of creating an informed view on the relationship between DDR and SSR. In providing inputs to more general assessments, broad expertise on the political and integrated nature of an SSR process may be more important than sector-specific knowledge. Where appropriate, experts from relevant bilateral\/multilateral actors should also be included. Including host state nationals or experts from the region within assessment teams will improve contextual understanding and awareness of local sensitivities and demonstrate a commitment to national ownership. Inclusion of team members with appropriate local language skills is essential. \\n Information gathering \u2013 Knowledge should be captured on SSR-relevant issues in a given context. It is important to engage with representatives of local communities including non-state and community-based security providers. This will help clarify community perceptions of security provision and vulnerabilities and identify the potential for tensions when ex-combatants are reintegrated into communities, including how this may be tied to weapons availability.", - "Color": null, - "Level": null, - "LevelName": null, + "Paragraph": "Box 5 Designing SSR-sensitive assessments \n Developing the terms of reference \u2013 Terms of reference (ToRs) for DDR assessments should include the need to consider potential synergies between DDR and SSR that can be identified and fed into planning processes. Draft ToRs should be shared between relevant DDR and SSR focal points to ensure that all relevant and cross-cutting issues are considered. The ToRs should also set out the composition of the assessment team. \n Composing the assessment team \u2013 Assessment teams should be multi-sectoral and include experts or focal points from related fields that are linked to the DDR process. The inclusion of SSR expertise represents an important way of creating an informed view on the relationship between DDR and SSR. In providing inputs to more general assessments, broad expertise on the political and integrated nature of an SSR process may be more important than sector-specific knowledge. Where appropriate, experts from relevant bilateral\/multilateral actors should also be included. Including host state nationals or experts from the region within assessment teams will improve contextual understanding and awareness of local sensitivities and demonstrate a commitment to national ownership. Inclusion of team members with appropriate local language skills is essential. \n Information gathering \u2013 Knowledge should be captured on SSR-relevant issues in a given context. It is important to engage with representatives of local communities including non-state and community-based security providers. This will help clarify community perceptions of security provision and vulnerabilities and identify the potential for tensions when ex-combatants are reintegrated into communities, including how this may be tied to weapons availability.", + "Color": "#CF7AB2", + "Level": 6, + "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", "PageNum": 17, @@ -191784,17 +191784,17 @@ "Heading2": "9.1. SSR-sensitive assessments", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Information gathering \u2013 Knowledge should be captured on SSR-relevant issues in a given context.", + "Sentence": "\n Information gathering \u2013 Knowledge should be captured on SSR-relevant issues in a given context.", "newParagraph": "box 5 designing ssrsensitive assessment n developing term reference term reference tor ddr assessment include need consider potential synergy ddr ssr identified fed planning process draft tor shared relevant ddr ssr focal point ensure relevant crosscutting issue considered tor also set composition assessment team n composing assessment team assessment team multisectoral include expert focal point related field linked ddr process inclusion ssr expertise represents important way creating informed view relationship ddr ssr providing input general assessment broad expertise political integrated nature ssr process may important sectorspecific knowledge appropriate expert relevant bilateralmultilateral actor also included including host state national expert region within assessment team improve contextual understanding awareness local sensitivity demonstrate commitment national ownership inclusion team member appropriate local language skill essential n information gathering knowledge captured ssrrelevant issue given context important engage representative local community including nonstate communitybased security provider help clarify community perception security provision vulnerability identify potential tension excombatants reintegrated community including may tied weapon availability", "ProcessedSent": "n information gathering knowledge captured ssrrelevant issue given context", "SentID": 10654 }, { "ParagraphID": 3025, - "Paragraph": "Box 5 Designing SSR-sensitive assessments \\n Developing the terms of reference \u2013 Terms of reference (ToRs) for DDR assessments should include the need to consider potential synergies between DDR and SSR that can be identified and fed into planning processes. Draft ToRs should be shared between relevant DDR and SSR focal points to ensure that all relevant and cross-cutting issues are considered. The ToRs should also set out the composition of the assessment team. \\n Composing the assessment team \u2013 Assessment teams should be multi-sectoral and include experts or focal points from related fields that are linked to the DDR process. The inclusion of SSR expertise represents an important way of creating an informed view on the relationship between DDR and SSR. In providing inputs to more general assessments, broad expertise on the political and integrated nature of an SSR process may be more important than sector-specific knowledge. Where appropriate, experts from relevant bilateral\/multilateral actors should also be included. Including host state nationals or experts from the region within assessment teams will improve contextual understanding and awareness of local sensitivities and demonstrate a commitment to national ownership. Inclusion of team members with appropriate local language skills is essential. \\n Information gathering \u2013 Knowledge should be captured on SSR-relevant issues in a given context. It is important to engage with representatives of local communities including non-state and community-based security providers. This will help clarify community perceptions of security provision and vulnerabilities and identify the potential for tensions when ex-combatants are reintegrated into communities, including how this may be tied to weapons availability.", - "Color": null, - "Level": null, - "LevelName": null, + "Paragraph": "Box 5 Designing SSR-sensitive assessments \n Developing the terms of reference \u2013 Terms of reference (ToRs) for DDR assessments should include the need to consider potential synergies between DDR and SSR that can be identified and fed into planning processes. Draft ToRs should be shared between relevant DDR and SSR focal points to ensure that all relevant and cross-cutting issues are considered. The ToRs should also set out the composition of the assessment team. \n Composing the assessment team \u2013 Assessment teams should be multi-sectoral and include experts or focal points from related fields that are linked to the DDR process. The inclusion of SSR expertise represents an important way of creating an informed view on the relationship between DDR and SSR. In providing inputs to more general assessments, broad expertise on the political and integrated nature of an SSR process may be more important than sector-specific knowledge. Where appropriate, experts from relevant bilateral\/multilateral actors should also be included. Including host state nationals or experts from the region within assessment teams will improve contextual understanding and awareness of local sensitivities and demonstrate a commitment to national ownership. Inclusion of team members with appropriate local language skills is essential. \n Information gathering \u2013 Knowledge should be captured on SSR-relevant issues in a given context. It is important to engage with representatives of local communities including non-state and community-based security providers. This will help clarify community perceptions of security provision and vulnerabilities and identify the potential for tensions when ex-combatants are reintegrated into communities, including how this may be tied to weapons availability.", + "Color": "#CF7AB2", + "Level": 6, + "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", "PageNum": 17, @@ -191809,10 +191809,10 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3025, - "Paragraph": "Box 5 Designing SSR-sensitive assessments \\n Developing the terms of reference \u2013 Terms of reference (ToRs) for DDR assessments should include the need to consider potential synergies between DDR and SSR that can be identified and fed into planning processes. Draft ToRs should be shared between relevant DDR and SSR focal points to ensure that all relevant and cross-cutting issues are considered. The ToRs should also set out the composition of the assessment team. \\n Composing the assessment team \u2013 Assessment teams should be multi-sectoral and include experts or focal points from related fields that are linked to the DDR process. The inclusion of SSR expertise represents an important way of creating an informed view on the relationship between DDR and SSR. In providing inputs to more general assessments, broad expertise on the political and integrated nature of an SSR process may be more important than sector-specific knowledge. Where appropriate, experts from relevant bilateral\/multilateral actors should also be included. Including host state nationals or experts from the region within assessment teams will improve contextual understanding and awareness of local sensitivities and demonstrate a commitment to national ownership. Inclusion of team members with appropriate local language skills is essential. \\n Information gathering \u2013 Knowledge should be captured on SSR-relevant issues in a given context. It is important to engage with representatives of local communities including non-state and community-based security providers. This will help clarify community perceptions of security provision and vulnerabilities and identify the potential for tensions when ex-combatants are reintegrated into communities, including how this may be tied to weapons availability.", - "Color": null, - "Level": null, - "LevelName": null, + "Paragraph": "Box 5 Designing SSR-sensitive assessments \n Developing the terms of reference \u2013 Terms of reference (ToRs) for DDR assessments should include the need to consider potential synergies between DDR and SSR that can be identified and fed into planning processes. Draft ToRs should be shared between relevant DDR and SSR focal points to ensure that all relevant and cross-cutting issues are considered. The ToRs should also set out the composition of the assessment team. \n Composing the assessment team \u2013 Assessment teams should be multi-sectoral and include experts or focal points from related fields that are linked to the DDR process. The inclusion of SSR expertise represents an important way of creating an informed view on the relationship between DDR and SSR. In providing inputs to more general assessments, broad expertise on the political and integrated nature of an SSR process may be more important than sector-specific knowledge. Where appropriate, experts from relevant bilateral\/multilateral actors should also be included. Including host state nationals or experts from the region within assessment teams will improve contextual understanding and awareness of local sensitivities and demonstrate a commitment to national ownership. Inclusion of team members with appropriate local language skills is essential. \n Information gathering \u2013 Knowledge should be captured on SSR-relevant issues in a given context. It is important to engage with representatives of local communities including non-state and community-based security providers. This will help clarify community perceptions of security provision and vulnerabilities and identify the potential for tensions when ex-combatants are reintegrated into communities, including how this may be tied to weapons availability.", + "Color": "#CF7AB2", + "Level": 6, + "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", "PageNum": 17, @@ -191829,7 +191829,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3026, "Paragraph": "A first step in the pre-mission planning stage leading to the development of a UN concept of operations is the initial technical assessment (see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning). In most cases, this is now conducted through a multidimensional technical assessment mission. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191847,7 +191847,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3026, "Paragraph": "A first step in the pre-mission planning stage leading to the development of a UN concept of operations is the initial technical assessment (see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning). In most cases, this is now conducted through a multidimensional technical assessment mission. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191865,7 +191865,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3027, "Paragraph": "Multidimensional technical assessment missions represent an entry point to begin en- gaging in discussion with SSR counterparts on potential synergies between DDR and SSR. If these elements are already reflected in the initial assessment report submitted to the Secretary-General, it is more likely that the provisions that subsequently appear in the mis- sion mandate for DDR and SSR will be coherent and mutually supportive.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191883,7 +191883,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3027, "Paragraph": "Multidimensional technical assessment missions represent an entry point to begin en- gaging in discussion with SSR counterparts on potential synergies between DDR and SSR. If these elements are already reflected in the initial assessment report submitted to the Secretary-General, it is more likely that the provisions that subsequently appear in the mis- sion mandate for DDR and SSR will be coherent and mutually supportive.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191899,9 +191899,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3028, - "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \\n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \\n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \\n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \\n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \\n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \\n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \\n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \\n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \\n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \\n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \\n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \\n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \\n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \\n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", + "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191910,16 +191910,16 @@ "Heading2": "9.1. SSR-sensitive assessments", "Heading3": "9.1.1. Multidimensional technical assessment mission", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \\n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making?", + "Sentence": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making?", "newParagraph": "box 6 indicative ssrrelated question include assessment n strategic policy framework process place develop national security justice strategy used inform ddr decisionmaking n map security actor active national level well region particularly relevant ddr process relate n regional political security dynamic may positively negatively impact ddrssr n map international actor active ddrssr area support coordinate n nonstate security provider exist gap fill formal security sector supporting threatening stability state supporting threatening security individual community n oversight accountability mechanism place security sector national regional local level n security sector actor play role understand function relation supporting ddr n capacitypolitical play role n existing mandate policy formal security sector actor providing security vulnerable marginalised group n plan ddr process compatible government priority security sector n ddr funding decision take account budget available ssr process well longrun financial mean available gap delay avoided n level national management capacity including human resource financial aspect support programme n potential champion spoiler relation ddr ssr process n public perception toward formal informal security sector", "ProcessedSent": "box 6 indicative ssrrelated question include assessment n strategic policy framework process place develop national security justice strategy used inform ddr decisionmaking", "SentID": 10661 }, { "ParagraphID": 3028, - "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \\n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \\n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \\n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \\n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \\n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \\n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \\n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \\n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \\n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \\n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \\n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \\n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \\n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \\n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", + "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191928,16 +191928,16 @@ "Heading2": "9.1. SSR-sensitive assessments", "Heading3": "9.1.1. Multidimensional technical assessment mission", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process.", + "Sentence": "\n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process.", "newParagraph": "box 6 indicative ssrrelated question include assessment n strategic policy framework process place develop national security justice strategy used inform ddr decisionmaking n map security actor active national level well region particularly relevant ddr process relate n regional political security dynamic may positively negatively impact ddrssr n map international actor active ddrssr area support coordinate n nonstate security provider exist gap fill formal security sector supporting threatening stability state supporting threatening security individual community n oversight accountability mechanism place security sector national regional local level n security sector actor play role understand function relation supporting ddr n capacitypolitical play role n existing mandate policy formal security sector actor providing security vulnerable marginalised group n plan ddr process compatible government priority security sector n ddr funding decision take account budget available ssr process well longrun financial mean available gap delay avoided n level national management capacity including human resource financial aspect support programme n potential champion spoiler relation ddr ssr process n public perception toward formal informal security sector", "ProcessedSent": "n map security actor active national level well region particularly relevant ddr process", "SentID": 10662 }, { "ParagraphID": 3028, - "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \\n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \\n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \\n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \\n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \\n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \\n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \\n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \\n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \\n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \\n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \\n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \\n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \\n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \\n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", + "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191953,9 +191953,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3028, - "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \\n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \\n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \\n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \\n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \\n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \\n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \\n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \\n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \\n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \\n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \\n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \\n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \\n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \\n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", + "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191964,16 +191964,16 @@ "Heading2": "9.1. SSR-sensitive assessments", "Heading3": "9.1.1. Multidimensional technical assessment mission", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR?", + "Sentence": "\n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR?", "newParagraph": "box 6 indicative ssrrelated question include assessment n strategic policy framework process place develop national security justice strategy used inform ddr decisionmaking n map security actor active national level well region particularly relevant ddr process relate n regional political security dynamic may positively negatively impact ddrssr n map international actor active ddrssr area support coordinate n nonstate security provider exist gap fill formal security sector supporting threatening stability state supporting threatening security individual community n oversight accountability mechanism place security sector national regional local level n security sector actor play role understand function relation supporting ddr n capacitypolitical play role n existing mandate policy formal security sector actor providing security vulnerable marginalised group n plan ddr process compatible government priority security sector n ddr funding decision take account budget available ssr process well longrun financial mean available gap delay avoided n level national management capacity including human resource financial aspect support programme n potential champion spoiler relation ddr ssr process n public perception toward formal informal security sector", "ProcessedSent": "n regional political security dynamic may positively negatively impact ddrssr", "SentID": 10664 }, { "ParagraphID": 3028, - "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \\n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \\n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \\n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \\n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \\n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \\n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \\n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \\n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \\n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \\n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \\n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \\n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \\n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \\n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", + "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -191982,16 +191982,16 @@ "Heading2": "9.1. SSR-sensitive assessments", "Heading3": "9.1.1. Multidimensional technical assessment mission", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR.", + "Sentence": "\n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR.", "newParagraph": "box 6 indicative ssrrelated question include assessment n strategic policy framework process place develop national security justice strategy used inform ddr decisionmaking n map security actor active national level well region particularly relevant ddr process relate n regional political security dynamic may positively negatively impact ddrssr n map international actor active ddrssr area support coordinate n nonstate security provider exist gap fill formal security sector supporting threatening stability state supporting threatening security individual community n oversight accountability mechanism place security sector national regional local level n security sector actor play role understand function relation supporting ddr n capacitypolitical play role n existing mandate policy formal security sector actor providing security vulnerable marginalised group n plan ddr process compatible government priority security sector n ddr funding decision take account budget available ssr process well longrun financial mean available gap delay avoided n level national management capacity including human resource financial aspect support programme n potential champion spoiler relation ddr ssr process n public perception toward formal informal security sector", "ProcessedSent": "n map international actor active ddrssr", "SentID": 10665 }, { "ParagraphID": 3028, - "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \\n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \\n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \\n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \\n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \\n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \\n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \\n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \\n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \\n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \\n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \\n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \\n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \\n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \\n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", + "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192007,9 +192007,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3028, - "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \\n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \\n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \\n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \\n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \\n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \\n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \\n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \\n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \\n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \\n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \\n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \\n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \\n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \\n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", + "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192018,16 +192018,16 @@ "Heading2": "9.1. SSR-sensitive assessments", "Heading3": "9.1.1. Multidimensional technical assessment mission", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector?", + "Sentence": "\n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector?", "newParagraph": "box 6 indicative ssrrelated question include assessment n strategic policy framework process place develop national security justice strategy used inform ddr decisionmaking n map security actor active national level well region particularly relevant ddr process relate n regional political security dynamic may positively negatively impact ddrssr n map international actor active ddrssr area support coordinate n nonstate security provider exist gap fill formal security sector supporting threatening stability state supporting threatening security individual community n oversight accountability mechanism place security sector national regional local level n security sector actor play role understand function relation supporting ddr n capacitypolitical play role n existing mandate policy formal security sector actor providing security vulnerable marginalised group n plan ddr process compatible government priority security sector n ddr funding decision take account budget available ssr process well longrun financial mean available gap delay avoided n level national management capacity including human resource financial aspect support programme n potential champion spoiler relation ddr ssr process n public perception toward formal informal security sector", "ProcessedSent": "n nonstate security provider exist gap fill formal security sector", "SentID": 10667 }, { "ParagraphID": 3028, - "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \\n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \\n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \\n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \\n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \\n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \\n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \\n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \\n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \\n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \\n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \\n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \\n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \\n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \\n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", + "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192036,16 +192036,16 @@ "Heading2": "9.1. SSR-sensitive assessments", "Heading3": "9.1.1. Multidimensional technical assessment mission", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "A\\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State?", + "Sentence": "A\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State?", "newParagraph": "box 6 indicative ssrrelated question include assessment n strategic policy framework process place develop national security justice strategy used inform ddr decisionmaking n map security actor active national level well region particularly relevant ddr process relate n regional political security dynamic may positively negatively impact ddrssr n map international actor active ddrssr area support coordinate n nonstate security provider exist gap fill formal security sector supporting threatening stability state supporting threatening security individual community n oversight accountability mechanism place security sector national regional local level n security sector actor play role understand function relation supporting ddr n capacitypolitical play role n existing mandate policy formal security sector actor providing security vulnerable marginalised group n plan ddr process compatible government priority security sector n ddr funding decision take account budget available ssr process well longrun financial mean available gap delay avoided n level national management capacity including human resource financial aspect support programme n potential champion spoiler relation ddr ssr process n public perception toward formal informal security sector", "ProcessedSent": "supporting threatening stability state", "SentID": 10668 }, { "ParagraphID": 3028, - "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \\n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \\n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \\n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \\n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \\n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \\n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \\n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \\n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \\n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \\n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \\n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \\n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \\n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \\n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", + "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192061,9 +192061,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3028, - "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \\n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \\n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \\n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \\n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \\n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \\n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \\n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \\n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \\n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \\n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \\n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \\n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \\n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \\n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", + "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192072,16 +192072,16 @@ "Heading2": "9.1. SSR-sensitive assessments", "Heading3": "9.1.1. Multidimensional technical assessment mission", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels?", + "Sentence": "\n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels?", "newParagraph": "box 6 indicative ssrrelated question include assessment n strategic policy framework process place develop national security justice strategy used inform ddr decisionmaking n map security actor active national level well region particularly relevant ddr process relate n regional political security dynamic may positively negatively impact ddrssr n map international actor active ddrssr area support coordinate n nonstate security provider exist gap fill formal security sector supporting threatening stability state supporting threatening security individual community n oversight accountability mechanism place security sector national regional local level n security sector actor play role understand function relation supporting ddr n capacitypolitical play role n existing mandate policy formal security sector actor providing security vulnerable marginalised group n plan ddr process compatible government priority security sector n ddr funding decision take account budget available ssr process well longrun financial mean available gap delay avoided n level national management capacity including human resource financial aspect support programme n potential champion spoiler relation ddr ssr process n public perception toward formal informal security sector", "ProcessedSent": "n oversight accountability mechanism place security sector national regional local level", "SentID": 10670 }, { "ParagraphID": 3028, - "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \\n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \\n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \\n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \\n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \\n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \\n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \\n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \\n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \\n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \\n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \\n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \\n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \\n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \\n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", + "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192090,16 +192090,16 @@ "Heading2": "9.1. SSR-sensitive assessments", "Heading3": "9.1.1. Multidimensional technical assessment mission", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR?", + "Sentence": "\n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR?", "newParagraph": "box 6 indicative ssrrelated question include assessment n strategic policy framework process place develop national security justice strategy used inform ddr decisionmaking n map security actor active national level well region particularly relevant ddr process relate n regional political security dynamic may positively negatively impact ddrssr n map international actor active ddrssr area support coordinate n nonstate security provider exist gap fill formal security sector supporting threatening stability state supporting threatening security individual community n oversight accountability mechanism place security sector national regional local level n security sector actor play role understand function relation supporting ddr n capacitypolitical play role n existing mandate policy formal security sector actor providing security vulnerable marginalised group n plan ddr process compatible government priority security sector n ddr funding decision take account budget available ssr process well longrun financial mean available gap delay avoided n level national management capacity including human resource financial aspect support programme n potential champion spoiler relation ddr ssr process n public perception toward formal informal security sector", "ProcessedSent": "n security sector actor play role understand function relation supporting ddr", "SentID": 10671 }, { "ParagraphID": 3028, - "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \\n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \\n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \\n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \\n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \\n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \\n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \\n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \\n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \\n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \\n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \\n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \\n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \\n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \\n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", + "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192108,16 +192108,16 @@ "Heading2": "9.1. SSR-sensitive assessments", "Heading3": "9.1.1. Multidimensional technical assessment mission", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role?", + "Sentence": "\n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role?", "newParagraph": "box 6 indicative ssrrelated question include assessment n strategic policy framework process place develop national security justice strategy used inform ddr decisionmaking n map security actor active national level well region particularly relevant ddr process relate n regional political security dynamic may positively negatively impact ddrssr n map international actor active ddrssr area support coordinate n nonstate security provider exist gap fill formal security sector supporting threatening stability state supporting threatening security individual community n oversight accountability mechanism place security sector national regional local level n security sector actor play role understand function relation supporting ddr n capacitypolitical play role n existing mandate policy formal security sector actor providing security vulnerable marginalised group n plan ddr process compatible government priority security sector n ddr funding decision take account budget available ssr process well longrun financial mean available gap delay avoided n level national management capacity including human resource financial aspect support programme n potential champion spoiler relation ddr ssr process n public perception toward formal informal security sector", "ProcessedSent": "n capacitypolitical play role", "SentID": 10672 }, { "ParagraphID": 3028, - "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \\n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \\n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \\n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \\n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \\n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \\n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \\n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \\n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \\n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \\n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \\n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \\n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \\n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \\n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", + "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192126,16 +192126,16 @@ "Heading2": "9.1. SSR-sensitive assessments", "Heading3": "9.1.1. Multidimensional technical assessment mission", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups?", + "Sentence": "\n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups?", "newParagraph": "box 6 indicative ssrrelated question include assessment n strategic policy framework process place develop national security justice strategy used inform ddr decisionmaking n map security actor active national level well region particularly relevant ddr process relate n regional political security dynamic may positively negatively impact ddrssr n map international actor active ddrssr area support coordinate n nonstate security provider exist gap fill formal security sector supporting threatening stability state supporting threatening security individual community n oversight accountability mechanism place security sector national regional local level n security sector actor play role understand function relation supporting ddr n capacitypolitical play role n existing mandate policy formal security sector actor providing security vulnerable marginalised group n plan ddr process compatible government priority security sector n ddr funding decision take account budget available ssr process well longrun financial mean available gap delay avoided n level national management capacity including human resource financial aspect support programme n potential champion spoiler relation ddr ssr process n public perception toward formal informal security sector", "ProcessedSent": "n existing mandate policy formal security sector actor providing security vulnerable marginalised group", "SentID": 10673 }, { "ParagraphID": 3028, - "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \\n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \\n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \\n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \\n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \\n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \\n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \\n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \\n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \\n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \\n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \\n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \\n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \\n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \\n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", + "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192144,16 +192144,16 @@ "Heading2": "9.1. SSR-sensitive assessments", "Heading3": "9.1.1. Multidimensional technical assessment mission", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector?", + "Sentence": "\n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector?", "newParagraph": "box 6 indicative ssrrelated question include assessment n strategic policy framework process place develop national security justice strategy used inform ddr decisionmaking n map security actor active national level well region particularly relevant ddr process relate n regional political security dynamic may positively negatively impact ddrssr n map international actor active ddrssr area support coordinate n nonstate security provider exist gap fill formal security sector supporting threatening stability state supporting threatening security individual community n oversight accountability mechanism place security sector national regional local level n security sector actor play role understand function relation supporting ddr n capacitypolitical play role n existing mandate policy formal security sector actor providing security vulnerable marginalised group n plan ddr process compatible government priority security sector n ddr funding decision take account budget available ssr process well longrun financial mean available gap delay avoided n level national management capacity including human resource financial aspect support programme n potential champion spoiler relation ddr ssr process n public perception toward formal informal security sector", "ProcessedSent": "n plan ddr process compatible government priority security sector", "SentID": 10674 }, { "ParagraphID": 3028, - "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \\n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \\n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \\n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \\n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \\n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \\n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \\n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \\n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \\n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \\n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \\n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \\n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \\n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \\n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", + "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192162,16 +192162,16 @@ "Heading2": "9.1. SSR-sensitive assessments", "Heading3": "9.1.1. Multidimensional technical assessment mission", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided?", + "Sentence": "\n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided?", "newParagraph": "box 6 indicative ssrrelated question include assessment n strategic policy framework process place develop national security justice strategy used inform ddr decisionmaking n map security actor active national level well region particularly relevant ddr process relate n regional political security dynamic may positively negatively impact ddrssr n map international actor active ddrssr area support coordinate n nonstate security provider exist gap fill formal security sector supporting threatening stability state supporting threatening security individual community n oversight accountability mechanism place security sector national regional local level n security sector actor play role understand function relation supporting ddr n capacitypolitical play role n existing mandate policy formal security sector actor providing security vulnerable marginalised group n plan ddr process compatible government priority security sector n ddr funding decision take account budget available ssr process well longrun financial mean available gap delay avoided n level national management capacity including human resource financial aspect support programme n potential champion spoiler relation ddr ssr process n public perception toward formal informal security sector", "ProcessedSent": "n ddr funding decision take account budget available ssr process well longrun financial mean available gap delay avoided", "SentID": 10675 }, { "ParagraphID": 3028, - "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \\n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \\n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \\n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \\n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \\n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \\n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \\n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \\n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \\n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \\n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \\n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \\n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \\n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \\n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", + "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192180,16 +192180,16 @@ "Heading2": "9.1. SSR-sensitive assessments", "Heading3": "9.1.1. Multidimensional technical assessment mission", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes?", + "Sentence": "\n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes?", "newParagraph": "box 6 indicative ssrrelated question include assessment n strategic policy framework process place develop national security justice strategy used inform ddr decisionmaking n map security actor active national level well region particularly relevant ddr process relate n regional political security dynamic may positively negatively impact ddrssr n map international actor active ddrssr area support coordinate n nonstate security provider exist gap fill formal security sector supporting threatening stability state supporting threatening security individual community n oversight accountability mechanism place security sector national regional local level n security sector actor play role understand function relation supporting ddr n capacitypolitical play role n existing mandate policy formal security sector actor providing security vulnerable marginalised group n plan ddr process compatible government priority security sector n ddr funding decision take account budget available ssr process well longrun financial mean available gap delay avoided n level national management capacity including human resource financial aspect support programme n potential champion spoiler relation ddr ssr process n public perception toward formal informal security sector", "ProcessedSent": "n level national management capacity including human resource financial aspect support programme", "SentID": 10676 }, { "ParagraphID": 3028, - "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \\n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \\n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \\n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \\n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \\n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \\n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \\n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \\n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \\n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \\n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \\n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \\n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \\n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \\n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", + "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192198,16 +192198,16 @@ "Heading2": "9.1. SSR-sensitive assessments", "Heading3": "9.1.1. Multidimensional technical assessment mission", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes?", + "Sentence": "\n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes?", "newParagraph": "box 6 indicative ssrrelated question include assessment n strategic policy framework process place develop national security justice strategy used inform ddr decisionmaking n map security actor active national level well region particularly relevant ddr process relate n regional political security dynamic may positively negatively impact ddrssr n map international actor active ddrssr area support coordinate n nonstate security provider exist gap fill formal security sector supporting threatening stability state supporting threatening security individual community n oversight accountability mechanism place security sector national regional local level n security sector actor play role understand function relation supporting ddr n capacitypolitical play role n existing mandate policy formal security sector actor providing security vulnerable marginalised group n plan ddr process compatible government priority security sector n ddr funding decision take account budget available ssr process well longrun financial mean available gap delay avoided n level national management capacity including human resource financial aspect support programme n potential champion spoiler relation ddr ssr process n public perception toward formal informal security sector", "ProcessedSent": "n potential champion spoiler relation ddr ssr process", "SentID": 10677 }, { "ParagraphID": 3028, - "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \\n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \\n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \\n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \\n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \\n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \\n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \\n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \\n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \\n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \\n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \\n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \\n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \\n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \\n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", + "Paragraph": "Box 6 Indicative SSR-related questions to include in assessments \n Is there a strategic policy framework or a process in place to develop a national security and justice strategy that can be used to inform DDR decision-making? \n Map the security actors that are active at the national level as well as in regions particularly relevant for the DDR process. How do they relate to each other? \n What are the regional political and security dynamics that may positively or negatively impact on DDR\/SSR? \n Map the international actors active in DDR\/SSR. What areas do they support and how do they coordinate? \n What non-state security providers exist and what gaps do they fill in the formal security sector? A\n re they supporting or threatening the stability of the State? Are they supporting or threatening the security of individuals and communities? \n What oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place for the security sector at national, regional and local levels? \n Do security sector actors play a role or understand their functions in relation to supporting DDR? \n Is there capacity\/political will to play this role? \n What are existing mandates and policies of formal security sector actors in providing security for vulnerable and marginalised groups? \n Are plans for the DDR process compatible with Government priorities for the security sector? \n Do DDR funding decisions take into account the budget available for the SSR process as well as the long-run financial means available so that gaps and delays are avoided? \n What is the level of national management capacity (including human resource and financial aspects) to support these programmes? \n Who are the potential champions and spoilers in relation to the DDR and SSR processes? \n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192216,7 +192216,7 @@ "Heading2": "9.1. SSR-sensitive assessments", "Heading3": "9.1.1. Multidimensional technical assessment mission", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", + "Sentence": "\n What are public perceptions toward the formal and informal security sector?", "newParagraph": "box 6 indicative ssrrelated question include assessment n strategic policy framework process place develop national security justice strategy used inform ddr decisionmaking n map security actor active national level well region particularly relevant ddr process relate n regional political security dynamic may positively negatively impact ddrssr n map international actor active ddrssr area support coordinate n nonstate security provider exist gap fill formal security sector supporting threatening stability state supporting threatening security individual community n oversight accountability mechanism place security sector national regional local level n security sector actor play role understand function relation supporting ddr n capacitypolitical play role n existing mandate policy formal security sector actor providing security vulnerable marginalised group n plan ddr process compatible government priority security sector n ddr funding decision take account budget available ssr process well longrun financial mean available gap delay avoided n level national management capacity including human resource financial aspect support programme n potential champion spoiler relation ddr ssr process n public perception toward formal informal security sector", "ProcessedSent": "n public perception toward formal informal security sector", "SentID": 10678 @@ -192225,7 +192225,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3029, "Paragraph": "If SSR issues and perspectives are to be integrated at an early stage, assessments and their outputs must reflect a holistic SSR approach and not just partial elements that may be most applicable in terms of early deployment. Situational analysis of relevant political, economic and security factors is essential in order to determine the type of SSR support that will best complement the DDR programme as well as to identify local and regional implications of decisions that may be crafted at the national level.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192243,7 +192243,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3029, "Paragraph": "If SSR issues and perspectives are to be integrated at an early stage, assessments and their outputs must reflect a holistic SSR approach and not just partial elements that may be most applicable in terms of early deployment. Situational analysis of relevant political, economic and security factors is essential in order to determine the type of SSR support that will best complement the DDR programme as well as to identify local and regional implications of decisions that may be crafted at the national level.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192261,7 +192261,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3030, "Paragraph": "Detailed field assessments that inform the development of the DDR programme should be linked to the design of SSR activities (see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning, Para 5.4). This may be done through joint assessment missions combining DDR and SSR com- ponents, or by drawing on SSR expertise throughout the assessment phase. Up to date conflict and security analysis should address the nexus between DDR and SSR in order to support effective engagement (see Box 6). Participatory assessments and institutional capac- ity assessments may be particularly useful for security-related research (see IDDRS 3.20 on DDR Programme Design, Para. 5.3.6).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192279,7 +192279,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3030, "Paragraph": "Detailed field assessments that inform the development of the DDR programme should be linked to the design of SSR activities (see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning, Para 5.4). This may be done through joint assessment missions combining DDR and SSR com- ponents, or by drawing on SSR expertise throughout the assessment phase. Up to date conflict and security analysis should address the nexus between DDR and SSR in order to support effective engagement (see Box 6). Participatory assessments and institutional capac- ity assessments may be particularly useful for security-related research (see IDDRS 3.20 on DDR Programme Design, Para. 5.3.6).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192297,7 +192297,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3030, "Paragraph": "Detailed field assessments that inform the development of the DDR programme should be linked to the design of SSR activities (see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning, Para 5.4). This may be done through joint assessment missions combining DDR and SSR com- ponents, or by drawing on SSR expertise throughout the assessment phase. Up to date conflict and security analysis should address the nexus between DDR and SSR in order to support effective engagement (see Box 6). Participatory assessments and institutional capac- ity assessments may be particularly useful for security-related research (see IDDRS 3.20 on DDR Programme Design, Para. 5.3.6).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192315,7 +192315,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3030, "Paragraph": "Detailed field assessments that inform the development of the DDR programme should be linked to the design of SSR activities (see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning, Para 5.4). This may be done through joint assessment missions combining DDR and SSR com- ponents, or by drawing on SSR expertise throughout the assessment phase. Up to date conflict and security analysis should address the nexus between DDR and SSR in order to support effective engagement (see Box 6). Participatory assessments and institutional capac- ity assessments may be particularly useful for security-related research (see IDDRS 3.20 on DDR Programme Design, Para. 5.3.6).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192333,7 +192333,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3030, "Paragraph": "Detailed field assessments that inform the development of the DDR programme should be linked to the design of SSR activities (see IDDRS 3.10 on Integrated DDR Planning, Para 5.4). This may be done through joint assessment missions combining DDR and SSR com- ponents, or by drawing on SSR expertise throughout the assessment phase. Up to date conflict and security analysis should address the nexus between DDR and SSR in order to support effective engagement (see Box 6). Participatory assessments and institutional capac- ity assessments may be particularly useful for security-related research (see IDDRS 3.20 on DDR Programme Design, Para. 5.3.6).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192351,7 +192351,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3031, "Paragraph": "It is particularly important that each phase of DDR programme design (see IDDRS 3.20 on DDR Programme Design) addresses the context-specific political environment within which DDR\/SSR issues are situated. Shifting political and security dynamics means that flexibility is an essential design factor. Specific elements of programme design should be integrated within overall strategic objectives that reflect the end state goals that DDR and SSR are seeking to achieve.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192369,7 +192369,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3031, "Paragraph": "It is particularly important that each phase of DDR programme design (see IDDRS 3.20 on DDR Programme Design) addresses the context-specific political environment within which DDR\/SSR issues are situated. Shifting political and security dynamics means that flexibility is an essential design factor. Specific elements of programme design should be integrated within overall strategic objectives that reflect the end state goals that DDR and SSR are seeking to achieve.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192387,7 +192387,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3031, "Paragraph": "It is particularly important that each phase of DDR programme design (see IDDRS 3.20 on DDR Programme Design) addresses the context-specific political environment within which DDR\/SSR issues are situated. Shifting political and security dynamics means that flexibility is an essential design factor. Specific elements of programme design should be integrated within overall strategic objectives that reflect the end state goals that DDR and SSR are seeking to achieve.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192405,7 +192405,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3032, "Paragraph": "Detailed field assessments should cover political and security issues as well as identifying key national and international stakeholders in these processes (see Box 6). The programme development and costing phase should result in indicators that reflect the relationship between DDR and SSR. These may include: linking disarmament\/demobilization and community security; ensuring integration reflects national security priorities and budgets; or demonstrating that operational DDR activities are combined with support for national management and oversight capacities. Development of the DDR implementation plan should integrate relevant capacities across UN, international community and national stake- holders that support DDR and SSR and reflect the implementation capacity of national authorities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192423,7 +192423,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3032, "Paragraph": "Detailed field assessments should cover political and security issues as well as identifying key national and international stakeholders in these processes (see Box 6). The programme development and costing phase should result in indicators that reflect the relationship between DDR and SSR. These may include: linking disarmament\/demobilization and community security; ensuring integration reflects national security priorities and budgets; or demonstrating that operational DDR activities are combined with support for national management and oversight capacities. Development of the DDR implementation plan should integrate relevant capacities across UN, international community and national stake- holders that support DDR and SSR and reflect the implementation capacity of national authorities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192441,7 +192441,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3032, "Paragraph": "Detailed field assessments should cover political and security issues as well as identifying key national and international stakeholders in these processes (see Box 6). The programme development and costing phase should result in indicators that reflect the relationship between DDR and SSR. These may include: linking disarmament\/demobilization and community security; ensuring integration reflects national security priorities and budgets; or demonstrating that operational DDR activities are combined with support for national management and oversight capacities. Development of the DDR implementation plan should integrate relevant capacities across UN, international community and national stake- holders that support DDR and SSR and reflect the implementation capacity of national authorities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192459,7 +192459,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3032, "Paragraph": "Detailed field assessments should cover political and security issues as well as identifying key national and international stakeholders in these processes (see Box 6). The programme development and costing phase should result in indicators that reflect the relationship between DDR and SSR. These may include: linking disarmament\/demobilization and community security; ensuring integration reflects national security priorities and budgets; or demonstrating that operational DDR activities are combined with support for national management and oversight capacities. Development of the DDR implementation plan should integrate relevant capacities across UN, international community and national stake- holders that support DDR and SSR and reflect the implementation capacity of national authorities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192477,7 +192477,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3033, "Paragraph": "Monitoring and evaluation can provide for a structured approach to recognising and opera- tionalising the linkages between DDR and SSR. It also serves as a mechanism for enhancing knowledge management and transfer. A common challenge results from information gaps due to rapidly changing political and security dynamics. While the MIS provides a structured means of collecting information, baseline data should be established and continuously mon- itored to adjust to changing conditions.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192495,7 +192495,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3033, "Paragraph": "Monitoring and evaluation can provide for a structured approach to recognising and opera- tionalising the linkages between DDR and SSR. It also serves as a mechanism for enhancing knowledge management and transfer. A common challenge results from information gaps due to rapidly changing political and security dynamics. While the MIS provides a structured means of collecting information, baseline data should be established and continuously mon- itored to adjust to changing conditions.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192513,7 +192513,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3033, "Paragraph": "Monitoring and evaluation can provide for a structured approach to recognising and opera- tionalising the linkages between DDR and SSR. It also serves as a mechanism for enhancing knowledge management and transfer. A common challenge results from information gaps due to rapidly changing political and security dynamics. While the MIS provides a structured means of collecting information, baseline data should be established and continuously mon- itored to adjust to changing conditions.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192531,7 +192531,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3033, "Paragraph": "Monitoring and evaluation can provide for a structured approach to recognising and opera- tionalising the linkages between DDR and SSR. It also serves as a mechanism for enhancing knowledge management and transfer. A common challenge results from information gaps due to rapidly changing political and security dynamics. While the MIS provides a structured means of collecting information, baseline data should be established and continuously mon- itored to adjust to changing conditions.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192549,7 +192549,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3034, "Paragraph": "In outcome evaluations, effective monitoring and evaluation should provide an entry point for reviewing DDR and SSR programmes to ensure that they are planned in a mutually supportive manner (see IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR Programmes). Reports of impact evaluations may provide a useful basis for analysing the intended impact of DDR\/SSR programmes, identifying their unintended consequences as well as adjusting programming objectives and priorities as appropriate. Mid-term reviews should be used as an opportunity to assess effectiveness and make necessary changes to programmes.14", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192567,7 +192567,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3034, "Paragraph": "In outcome evaluations, effective monitoring and evaluation should provide an entry point for reviewing DDR and SSR programmes to ensure that they are planned in a mutually supportive manner (see IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR Programmes). Reports of impact evaluations may provide a useful basis for analysing the intended impact of DDR\/SSR programmes, identifying their unintended consequences as well as adjusting programming objectives and priorities as appropriate. Mid-term reviews should be used as an opportunity to assess effectiveness and make necessary changes to programmes.14", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192585,7 +192585,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3034, "Paragraph": "In outcome evaluations, effective monitoring and evaluation should provide an entry point for reviewing DDR and SSR programmes to ensure that they are planned in a mutually supportive manner (see IDDRS 3.50 on Monitoring and Evaluation of DDR Programmes). Reports of impact evaluations may provide a useful basis for analysing the intended impact of DDR\/SSR programmes, identifying their unintended consequences as well as adjusting programming objectives and priorities as appropriate. Mid-term reviews should be used as an opportunity to assess effectiveness and make necessary changes to programmes.14", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192603,7 +192603,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3035, "Paragraph": "Linking international support to a broad based, nationally owned process provides an important basis for coherent DDR and SSR programming. As discussed below, national dialogue, peace processes and national security or sector-specific policy reviews all repre- sent entry points to link DDR and SSR within a broader national governance framework.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192621,7 +192621,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3035, "Paragraph": "Linking international support to a broad based, nationally owned process provides an important basis for coherent DDR and SSR programming. As discussed below, national dialogue, peace processes and national security or sector-specific policy reviews all repre- sent entry points to link DDR and SSR within a broader national governance framework.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192639,7 +192639,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3036, "Paragraph": "Holding a national seminar does not mean that a common vision of necessary reform measures will (or should) be the outcome. Rather, it can mark the start of a participatory process of dialogue intended to clarify national needs and values and thus link short term security goals to longer term objectives. How national dialogue processes are designed and implemented may be more important than concrete outputs. Broad participation, including the transitional or elected authorities as well as representatives of the security sector, oversight bodies and civil society is important to enhance legitimacy and relevance. They can occur before or after the signing of a peace agreement. Equally, they can take place during transitional periods or following national elections to provide impetus to the peacebuilding process.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192657,7 +192657,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3036, "Paragraph": "Holding a national seminar does not mean that a common vision of necessary reform measures will (or should) be the outcome. Rather, it can mark the start of a participatory process of dialogue intended to clarify national needs and values and thus link short term security goals to longer term objectives. How national dialogue processes are designed and implemented may be more important than concrete outputs. Broad participation, including the transitional or elected authorities as well as representatives of the security sector, oversight bodies and civil society is important to enhance legitimacy and relevance. They can occur before or after the signing of a peace agreement. Equally, they can take place during transitional periods or following national elections to provide impetus to the peacebuilding process.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192675,7 +192675,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3036, "Paragraph": "Holding a national seminar does not mean that a common vision of necessary reform measures will (or should) be the outcome. Rather, it can mark the start of a participatory process of dialogue intended to clarify national needs and values and thus link short term security goals to longer term objectives. How national dialogue processes are designed and implemented may be more important than concrete outputs. Broad participation, including the transitional or elected authorities as well as representatives of the security sector, oversight bodies and civil society is important to enhance legitimacy and relevance. They can occur before or after the signing of a peace agreement. Equally, they can take place during transitional periods or following national elections to provide impetus to the peacebuilding process.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192693,7 +192693,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3036, "Paragraph": "Holding a national seminar does not mean that a common vision of necessary reform measures will (or should) be the outcome. Rather, it can mark the start of a participatory process of dialogue intended to clarify national needs and values and thus link short term security goals to longer term objectives. How national dialogue processes are designed and implemented may be more important than concrete outputs. Broad participation, including the transitional or elected authorities as well as representatives of the security sector, oversight bodies and civil society is important to enhance legitimacy and relevance. They can occur before or after the signing of a peace agreement. Equally, they can take place during transitional periods or following national elections to provide impetus to the peacebuilding process.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192711,7 +192711,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3036, "Paragraph": "Holding a national seminar does not mean that a common vision of necessary reform measures will (or should) be the outcome. Rather, it can mark the start of a participatory process of dialogue intended to clarify national needs and values and thus link short term security goals to longer term objectives. How national dialogue processes are designed and implemented may be more important than concrete outputs. Broad participation, including the transitional or elected authorities as well as representatives of the security sector, oversight bodies and civil society is important to enhance legitimacy and relevance. They can occur before or after the signing of a peace agreement. Equally, they can take place during transitional periods or following national elections to provide impetus to the peacebuilding process.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192729,7 +192729,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3036, "Paragraph": "Holding a national seminar does not mean that a common vision of necessary reform measures will (or should) be the outcome. Rather, it can mark the start of a participatory process of dialogue intended to clarify national needs and values and thus link short term security goals to longer term objectives. How national dialogue processes are designed and implemented may be more important than concrete outputs. Broad participation, including the transitional or elected authorities as well as representatives of the security sector, oversight bodies and civil society is important to enhance legitimacy and relevance. They can occur before or after the signing of a peace agreement. Equally, they can take place during transitional periods or following national elections to provide impetus to the peacebuilding process.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192747,7 +192747,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3037, "Paragraph": "National dialogue processes should be supported as a means to foster common understandings of DDR and SSR challenges (See Case Study Box 5). Depending on the circumstances, specific sectoral presentations at national seminars may be useful to share developments in different parts of the security sector, foster national ownership and better understand the expectations and perspectives of different stakeholder groups. A sub-group on DDR-SSR linkages or specific sub-groups on issues such as political good governance may be established in order to develop knowledge and raise awareness on this nexus. Support to national dialogue processes should include provision of follow-up mechanisms to enhance sustainability.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192765,7 +192765,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3037, "Paragraph": "National dialogue processes should be supported as a means to foster common understandings of DDR and SSR challenges (See Case Study Box 5). Depending on the circumstances, specific sectoral presentations at national seminars may be useful to share developments in different parts of the security sector, foster national ownership and better understand the expectations and perspectives of different stakeholder groups. A sub-group on DDR-SSR linkages or specific sub-groups on issues such as political good governance may be established in order to develop knowledge and raise awareness on this nexus. Support to national dialogue processes should include provision of follow-up mechanisms to enhance sustainability.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192783,7 +192783,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3037, "Paragraph": "National dialogue processes should be supported as a means to foster common understandings of DDR and SSR challenges (See Case Study Box 5). Depending on the circumstances, specific sectoral presentations at national seminars may be useful to share developments in different parts of the security sector, foster national ownership and better understand the expectations and perspectives of different stakeholder groups. A sub-group on DDR-SSR linkages or specific sub-groups on issues such as political good governance may be established in order to develop knowledge and raise awareness on this nexus. Support to national dialogue processes should include provision of follow-up mechanisms to enhance sustainability.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192801,7 +192801,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3037, "Paragraph": "National dialogue processes should be supported as a means to foster common understandings of DDR and SSR challenges (See Case Study Box 5). Depending on the circumstances, specific sectoral presentations at national seminars may be useful to share developments in different parts of the security sector, foster national ownership and better understand the expectations and perspectives of different stakeholder groups. A sub-group on DDR-SSR linkages or specific sub-groups on issues such as political good governance may be established in order to develop knowledge and raise awareness on this nexus. Support to national dialogue processes should include provision of follow-up mechanisms to enhance sustainability.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192817,9 +192817,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3038, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 5 DDR & the national dialogue on SSR in the CAR \\n In the Central African Republic, a dysfunctional and poorly governed security sector has been identified as one of the root causes of conflict. Discussions on DDR were therefore couched in the broader framework of SSR and encouraging a national dialogue process was identified as a first step in addressing this issue. As part of this process, a national seminar was held from 14\u201317 April 2008. The seminar was prepared by a national Security Sector Reform Committee consisting of government officials, rep-resentatives of CAR\u2019s security and justice services, and members of civil society. The seminar resulted in a roadmap for SSR implementation and also set up an evaluation mechanism to review progress. It provided a framework for many of the decisions in subsequent discussions and agreements. The seminar was held at an opportune moment as it was able to guide discussions on other critical aspects of the peace process. A working group session on DDR\/SSR linkages contributed to crystallizing in the minds of the various stakeholders the need to avoid thinking about these issues separately.", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 5 DDR & the national dialogue on SSR in the CAR \n In the Central African Republic, a dysfunctional and poorly governed security sector has been identified as one of the root causes of conflict. Discussions on DDR were therefore couched in the broader framework of SSR and encouraging a national dialogue process was identified as a first step in addressing this issue. As part of this process, a national seminar was held from 14\u201317 April 2008. The seminar was prepared by a national Security Sector Reform Committee consisting of government officials, rep-resentatives of CAR\u2019s security and justice services, and members of civil society. The seminar resulted in a roadmap for SSR implementation and also set up an evaluation mechanism to review progress. It provided a framework for many of the decisions in subsequent discussions and agreements. The seminar was held at an opportune moment as it was able to guide discussions on other critical aspects of the peace process. A working group session on DDR\/SSR linkages contributed to crystallizing in the minds of the various stakeholders the need to avoid thinking about these issues separately.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192828,16 +192828,16 @@ "Heading2": "9.4. Entry points", "Heading3": "9.4.1. National dialogue", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Case Study Box 5 DDR & the national dialogue on SSR in the CAR \\n In the Central African Republic, a dysfunctional and poorly governed security sector has been identified as one of the root causes of conflict.", + "Sentence": "Case Study Box 5 DDR & the national dialogue on SSR in the CAR \n In the Central African Republic, a dysfunctional and poorly governed security sector has been identified as one of the root causes of conflict.", "newParagraph": "case study box 5 ddr national dialogue ssr car n central african republic dysfunctional poorly governed security sector identified one root cause conflict discussion ddr therefore couched broader framework ssr encouraging national dialogue process identified first step addressing issue part process national seminar held 14 17 april 2008 seminar prepared national security sector reform committee consisting government official representative car security justice service member civil society seminar resulted roadmap ssr implementation also set evaluation mechanism review progress provided framework many decision subsequent discussion agreement seminar held opportune moment able guide discussion critical aspect peace process working group session ddrssr linkage contributed crystallizing mind various stakeholder need avoid thinking issue separately", "ProcessedSent": "case study box 5 ddr national dialogue ssr car n central african republic dysfunctional poorly governed security sector identified one root cause conflict", "SentID": 10712 }, { "ParagraphID": 3038, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 5 DDR & the national dialogue on SSR in the CAR \\n In the Central African Republic, a dysfunctional and poorly governed security sector has been identified as one of the root causes of conflict. Discussions on DDR were therefore couched in the broader framework of SSR and encouraging a national dialogue process was identified as a first step in addressing this issue. As part of this process, a national seminar was held from 14\u201317 April 2008. The seminar was prepared by a national Security Sector Reform Committee consisting of government officials, rep-resentatives of CAR\u2019s security and justice services, and members of civil society. The seminar resulted in a roadmap for SSR implementation and also set up an evaluation mechanism to review progress. It provided a framework for many of the decisions in subsequent discussions and agreements. The seminar was held at an opportune moment as it was able to guide discussions on other critical aspects of the peace process. A working group session on DDR\/SSR linkages contributed to crystallizing in the minds of the various stakeholders the need to avoid thinking about these issues separately.", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 5 DDR & the national dialogue on SSR in the CAR \n In the Central African Republic, a dysfunctional and poorly governed security sector has been identified as one of the root causes of conflict. Discussions on DDR were therefore couched in the broader framework of SSR and encouraging a national dialogue process was identified as a first step in addressing this issue. As part of this process, a national seminar was held from 14\u201317 April 2008. The seminar was prepared by a national Security Sector Reform Committee consisting of government officials, rep-resentatives of CAR\u2019s security and justice services, and members of civil society. The seminar resulted in a roadmap for SSR implementation and also set up an evaluation mechanism to review progress. It provided a framework for many of the decisions in subsequent discussions and agreements. The seminar was held at an opportune moment as it was able to guide discussions on other critical aspects of the peace process. A working group session on DDR\/SSR linkages contributed to crystallizing in the minds of the various stakeholders the need to avoid thinking about these issues separately.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192853,9 +192853,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3038, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 5 DDR & the national dialogue on SSR in the CAR \\n In the Central African Republic, a dysfunctional and poorly governed security sector has been identified as one of the root causes of conflict. Discussions on DDR were therefore couched in the broader framework of SSR and encouraging a national dialogue process was identified as a first step in addressing this issue. As part of this process, a national seminar was held from 14\u201317 April 2008. The seminar was prepared by a national Security Sector Reform Committee consisting of government officials, rep-resentatives of CAR\u2019s security and justice services, and members of civil society. The seminar resulted in a roadmap for SSR implementation and also set up an evaluation mechanism to review progress. It provided a framework for many of the decisions in subsequent discussions and agreements. The seminar was held at an opportune moment as it was able to guide discussions on other critical aspects of the peace process. A working group session on DDR\/SSR linkages contributed to crystallizing in the minds of the various stakeholders the need to avoid thinking about these issues separately.", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 5 DDR & the national dialogue on SSR in the CAR \n In the Central African Republic, a dysfunctional and poorly governed security sector has been identified as one of the root causes of conflict. Discussions on DDR were therefore couched in the broader framework of SSR and encouraging a national dialogue process was identified as a first step in addressing this issue. As part of this process, a national seminar was held from 14\u201317 April 2008. The seminar was prepared by a national Security Sector Reform Committee consisting of government officials, rep-resentatives of CAR\u2019s security and justice services, and members of civil society. The seminar resulted in a roadmap for SSR implementation and also set up an evaluation mechanism to review progress. It provided a framework for many of the decisions in subsequent discussions and agreements. The seminar was held at an opportune moment as it was able to guide discussions on other critical aspects of the peace process. A working group session on DDR\/SSR linkages contributed to crystallizing in the minds of the various stakeholders the need to avoid thinking about these issues separately.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192871,9 +192871,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3038, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 5 DDR & the national dialogue on SSR in the CAR \\n In the Central African Republic, a dysfunctional and poorly governed security sector has been identified as one of the root causes of conflict. Discussions on DDR were therefore couched in the broader framework of SSR and encouraging a national dialogue process was identified as a first step in addressing this issue. As part of this process, a national seminar was held from 14\u201317 April 2008. The seminar was prepared by a national Security Sector Reform Committee consisting of government officials, rep-resentatives of CAR\u2019s security and justice services, and members of civil society. The seminar resulted in a roadmap for SSR implementation and also set up an evaluation mechanism to review progress. It provided a framework for many of the decisions in subsequent discussions and agreements. The seminar was held at an opportune moment as it was able to guide discussions on other critical aspects of the peace process. A working group session on DDR\/SSR linkages contributed to crystallizing in the minds of the various stakeholders the need to avoid thinking about these issues separately.", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 5 DDR & the national dialogue on SSR in the CAR \n In the Central African Republic, a dysfunctional and poorly governed security sector has been identified as one of the root causes of conflict. Discussions on DDR were therefore couched in the broader framework of SSR and encouraging a national dialogue process was identified as a first step in addressing this issue. As part of this process, a national seminar was held from 14\u201317 April 2008. The seminar was prepared by a national Security Sector Reform Committee consisting of government officials, rep-resentatives of CAR\u2019s security and justice services, and members of civil society. The seminar resulted in a roadmap for SSR implementation and also set up an evaluation mechanism to review progress. It provided a framework for many of the decisions in subsequent discussions and agreements. The seminar was held at an opportune moment as it was able to guide discussions on other critical aspects of the peace process. A working group session on DDR\/SSR linkages contributed to crystallizing in the minds of the various stakeholders the need to avoid thinking about these issues separately.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192889,9 +192889,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3038, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 5 DDR & the national dialogue on SSR in the CAR \\n In the Central African Republic, a dysfunctional and poorly governed security sector has been identified as one of the root causes of conflict. Discussions on DDR were therefore couched in the broader framework of SSR and encouraging a national dialogue process was identified as a first step in addressing this issue. As part of this process, a national seminar was held from 14\u201317 April 2008. The seminar was prepared by a national Security Sector Reform Committee consisting of government officials, rep-resentatives of CAR\u2019s security and justice services, and members of civil society. The seminar resulted in a roadmap for SSR implementation and also set up an evaluation mechanism to review progress. It provided a framework for many of the decisions in subsequent discussions and agreements. The seminar was held at an opportune moment as it was able to guide discussions on other critical aspects of the peace process. A working group session on DDR\/SSR linkages contributed to crystallizing in the minds of the various stakeholders the need to avoid thinking about these issues separately.", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 5 DDR & the national dialogue on SSR in the CAR \n In the Central African Republic, a dysfunctional and poorly governed security sector has been identified as one of the root causes of conflict. Discussions on DDR were therefore couched in the broader framework of SSR and encouraging a national dialogue process was identified as a first step in addressing this issue. As part of this process, a national seminar was held from 14\u201317 April 2008. The seminar was prepared by a national Security Sector Reform Committee consisting of government officials, rep-resentatives of CAR\u2019s security and justice services, and members of civil society. The seminar resulted in a roadmap for SSR implementation and also set up an evaluation mechanism to review progress. It provided a framework for many of the decisions in subsequent discussions and agreements. The seminar was held at an opportune moment as it was able to guide discussions on other critical aspects of the peace process. A working group session on DDR\/SSR linkages contributed to crystallizing in the minds of the various stakeholders the need to avoid thinking about these issues separately.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192907,9 +192907,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3038, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 5 DDR & the national dialogue on SSR in the CAR \\n In the Central African Republic, a dysfunctional and poorly governed security sector has been identified as one of the root causes of conflict. Discussions on DDR were therefore couched in the broader framework of SSR and encouraging a national dialogue process was identified as a first step in addressing this issue. As part of this process, a national seminar was held from 14\u201317 April 2008. The seminar was prepared by a national Security Sector Reform Committee consisting of government officials, rep-resentatives of CAR\u2019s security and justice services, and members of civil society. The seminar resulted in a roadmap for SSR implementation and also set up an evaluation mechanism to review progress. It provided a framework for many of the decisions in subsequent discussions and agreements. The seminar was held at an opportune moment as it was able to guide discussions on other critical aspects of the peace process. A working group session on DDR\/SSR linkages contributed to crystallizing in the minds of the various stakeholders the need to avoid thinking about these issues separately.", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 5 DDR & the national dialogue on SSR in the CAR \n In the Central African Republic, a dysfunctional and poorly governed security sector has been identified as one of the root causes of conflict. Discussions on DDR were therefore couched in the broader framework of SSR and encouraging a national dialogue process was identified as a first step in addressing this issue. As part of this process, a national seminar was held from 14\u201317 April 2008. The seminar was prepared by a national Security Sector Reform Committee consisting of government officials, rep-resentatives of CAR\u2019s security and justice services, and members of civil society. The seminar resulted in a roadmap for SSR implementation and also set up an evaluation mechanism to review progress. It provided a framework for many of the decisions in subsequent discussions and agreements. The seminar was held at an opportune moment as it was able to guide discussions on other critical aspects of the peace process. A working group session on DDR\/SSR linkages contributed to crystallizing in the minds of the various stakeholders the need to avoid thinking about these issues separately.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192925,9 +192925,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3038, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 5 DDR & the national dialogue on SSR in the CAR \\n In the Central African Republic, a dysfunctional and poorly governed security sector has been identified as one of the root causes of conflict. Discussions on DDR were therefore couched in the broader framework of SSR and encouraging a national dialogue process was identified as a first step in addressing this issue. As part of this process, a national seminar was held from 14\u201317 April 2008. The seminar was prepared by a national Security Sector Reform Committee consisting of government officials, rep-resentatives of CAR\u2019s security and justice services, and members of civil society. The seminar resulted in a roadmap for SSR implementation and also set up an evaluation mechanism to review progress. It provided a framework for many of the decisions in subsequent discussions and agreements. The seminar was held at an opportune moment as it was able to guide discussions on other critical aspects of the peace process. A working group session on DDR\/SSR linkages contributed to crystallizing in the minds of the various stakeholders the need to avoid thinking about these issues separately.", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 5 DDR & the national dialogue on SSR in the CAR \n In the Central African Republic, a dysfunctional and poorly governed security sector has been identified as one of the root causes of conflict. Discussions on DDR were therefore couched in the broader framework of SSR and encouraging a national dialogue process was identified as a first step in addressing this issue. As part of this process, a national seminar was held from 14\u201317 April 2008. The seminar was prepared by a national Security Sector Reform Committee consisting of government officials, rep-resentatives of CAR\u2019s security and justice services, and members of civil society. The seminar resulted in a roadmap for SSR implementation and also set up an evaluation mechanism to review progress. It provided a framework for many of the decisions in subsequent discussions and agreements. The seminar was held at an opportune moment as it was able to guide discussions on other critical aspects of the peace process. A working group session on DDR\/SSR linkages contributed to crystallizing in the minds of the various stakeholders the need to avoid thinking about these issues separately.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192943,9 +192943,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3038, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 5 DDR & the national dialogue on SSR in the CAR \\n In the Central African Republic, a dysfunctional and poorly governed security sector has been identified as one of the root causes of conflict. Discussions on DDR were therefore couched in the broader framework of SSR and encouraging a national dialogue process was identified as a first step in addressing this issue. As part of this process, a national seminar was held from 14\u201317 April 2008. The seminar was prepared by a national Security Sector Reform Committee consisting of government officials, rep-resentatives of CAR\u2019s security and justice services, and members of civil society. The seminar resulted in a roadmap for SSR implementation and also set up an evaluation mechanism to review progress. It provided a framework for many of the decisions in subsequent discussions and agreements. The seminar was held at an opportune moment as it was able to guide discussions on other critical aspects of the peace process. A working group session on DDR\/SSR linkages contributed to crystallizing in the minds of the various stakeholders the need to avoid thinking about these issues separately.", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 5 DDR & the national dialogue on SSR in the CAR \n In the Central African Republic, a dysfunctional and poorly governed security sector has been identified as one of the root causes of conflict. Discussions on DDR were therefore couched in the broader framework of SSR and encouraging a national dialogue process was identified as a first step in addressing this issue. As part of this process, a national seminar was held from 14\u201317 April 2008. The seminar was prepared by a national Security Sector Reform Committee consisting of government officials, rep-resentatives of CAR\u2019s security and justice services, and members of civil society. The seminar resulted in a roadmap for SSR implementation and also set up an evaluation mechanism to review progress. It provided a framework for many of the decisions in subsequent discussions and agreements. The seminar was held at an opportune moment as it was able to guide discussions on other critical aspects of the peace process. A working group session on DDR\/SSR linkages contributed to crystallizing in the minds of the various stakeholders the need to avoid thinking about these issues separately.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192963,7 +192963,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3039, "Paragraph": "Peace processes serve as an early opportunity to ensure DDR and SSR concerns are included on the national agenda and linked within a common framework.15 While DDR decisions often form part of agreements, the relationship between these provisions and decisions on the size and nature of post-conflict security forces frequently reflect the immediate priorities and interests of the different parties\u2014such as maintaining a power base and rewarding allies\u2014rather than being determined by the security needs of the state and its citizens. In supporting peace processes, SSR concerns should therefore influence approach and substance.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192981,7 +192981,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3039, "Paragraph": "Peace processes serve as an early opportunity to ensure DDR and SSR concerns are included on the national agenda and linked within a common framework.15 While DDR decisions often form part of agreements, the relationship between these provisions and decisions on the size and nature of post-conflict security forces frequently reflect the immediate priorities and interests of the different parties\u2014such as maintaining a power base and rewarding allies\u2014rather than being determined by the security needs of the state and its citizens. In supporting peace processes, SSR concerns should therefore influence approach and substance.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -192999,7 +192999,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3040, "Paragraph": "Where feasible, decisions within peace agreements on demobilization and retention of ex-combatants should be informed by the needs of the future security sector. Level 6 Linkages with other Processes DDR and Security Sector Reform 21 6.10 needs of the future security sector. Given that SSR frameworks will evolve long after the conclusion of peace negotiations, flexibility is important to ensure that parties are not tightly bound to decisions (e.g. on force size) that later prove unrealistic. However, agreement on the broad frameworks of subsequent SSR processes, especially commitments to consultative mechanisms, can provide parties with confidence in and commitment to both the initial DDR programme and recognition of the linkages with longer term SSR requirements. The provision of both DDR and SSR expertise within negotiations can ensure coherence between the two processes. In particular, it is important that advisers promote a broad understanding of SSR that links reform of security providers to issues of management, oversight and accountability. Providing expertise drawn from the same region and ensuring a role for regional political organisations in negotiations may provide additional credibility through their contextual awareness and legitimacy.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193017,7 +193017,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3040, "Paragraph": "Where feasible, decisions within peace agreements on demobilization and retention of ex-combatants should be informed by the needs of the future security sector. Level 6 Linkages with other Processes DDR and Security Sector Reform 21 6.10 needs of the future security sector. Given that SSR frameworks will evolve long after the conclusion of peace negotiations, flexibility is important to ensure that parties are not tightly bound to decisions (e.g. on force size) that later prove unrealistic. However, agreement on the broad frameworks of subsequent SSR processes, especially commitments to consultative mechanisms, can provide parties with confidence in and commitment to both the initial DDR programme and recognition of the linkages with longer term SSR requirements. The provision of both DDR and SSR expertise within negotiations can ensure coherence between the two processes. In particular, it is important that advisers promote a broad understanding of SSR that links reform of security providers to issues of management, oversight and accountability. Providing expertise drawn from the same region and ensuring a role for regional political organisations in negotiations may provide additional credibility through their contextual awareness and legitimacy.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193035,7 +193035,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3040, "Paragraph": "Where feasible, decisions within peace agreements on demobilization and retention of ex-combatants should be informed by the needs of the future security sector. Level 6 Linkages with other Processes DDR and Security Sector Reform 21 6.10 needs of the future security sector. Given that SSR frameworks will evolve long after the conclusion of peace negotiations, flexibility is important to ensure that parties are not tightly bound to decisions (e.g. on force size) that later prove unrealistic. However, agreement on the broad frameworks of subsequent SSR processes, especially commitments to consultative mechanisms, can provide parties with confidence in and commitment to both the initial DDR programme and recognition of the linkages with longer term SSR requirements. The provision of both DDR and SSR expertise within negotiations can ensure coherence between the two processes. In particular, it is important that advisers promote a broad understanding of SSR that links reform of security providers to issues of management, oversight and accountability. Providing expertise drawn from the same region and ensuring a role for regional political organisations in negotiations may provide additional credibility through their contextual awareness and legitimacy.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193053,7 +193053,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3040, "Paragraph": "Where feasible, decisions within peace agreements on demobilization and retention of ex-combatants should be informed by the needs of the future security sector. Level 6 Linkages with other Processes DDR and Security Sector Reform 21 6.10 needs of the future security sector. Given that SSR frameworks will evolve long after the conclusion of peace negotiations, flexibility is important to ensure that parties are not tightly bound to decisions (e.g. on force size) that later prove unrealistic. However, agreement on the broad frameworks of subsequent SSR processes, especially commitments to consultative mechanisms, can provide parties with confidence in and commitment to both the initial DDR programme and recognition of the linkages with longer term SSR requirements. The provision of both DDR and SSR expertise within negotiations can ensure coherence between the two processes. In particular, it is important that advisers promote a broad understanding of SSR that links reform of security providers to issues of management, oversight and accountability. Providing expertise drawn from the same region and ensuring a role for regional political organisations in negotiations may provide additional credibility through their contextual awareness and legitimacy.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193071,7 +193071,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3040, "Paragraph": "Where feasible, decisions within peace agreements on demobilization and retention of ex-combatants should be informed by the needs of the future security sector. Level 6 Linkages with other Processes DDR and Security Sector Reform 21 6.10 needs of the future security sector. Given that SSR frameworks will evolve long after the conclusion of peace negotiations, flexibility is important to ensure that parties are not tightly bound to decisions (e.g. on force size) that later prove unrealistic. However, agreement on the broad frameworks of subsequent SSR processes, especially commitments to consultative mechanisms, can provide parties with confidence in and commitment to both the initial DDR programme and recognition of the linkages with longer term SSR requirements. The provision of both DDR and SSR expertise within negotiations can ensure coherence between the two processes. In particular, it is important that advisers promote a broad understanding of SSR that links reform of security providers to issues of management, oversight and accountability. Providing expertise drawn from the same region and ensuring a role for regional political organisations in negotiations may provide additional credibility through their contextual awareness and legitimacy.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193089,7 +193089,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3040, "Paragraph": "Where feasible, decisions within peace agreements on demobilization and retention of ex-combatants should be informed by the needs of the future security sector. Level 6 Linkages with other Processes DDR and Security Sector Reform 21 6.10 needs of the future security sector. Given that SSR frameworks will evolve long after the conclusion of peace negotiations, flexibility is important to ensure that parties are not tightly bound to decisions (e.g. on force size) that later prove unrealistic. However, agreement on the broad frameworks of subsequent SSR processes, especially commitments to consultative mechanisms, can provide parties with confidence in and commitment to both the initial DDR programme and recognition of the linkages with longer term SSR requirements. The provision of both DDR and SSR expertise within negotiations can ensure coherence between the two processes. In particular, it is important that advisers promote a broad understanding of SSR that links reform of security providers to issues of management, oversight and accountability. Providing expertise drawn from the same region and ensuring a role for regional political organisations in negotiations may provide additional credibility through their contextual awareness and legitimacy.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193107,7 +193107,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3040, "Paragraph": "Where feasible, decisions within peace agreements on demobilization and retention of ex-combatants should be informed by the needs of the future security sector. Level 6 Linkages with other Processes DDR and Security Sector Reform 21 6.10 needs of the future security sector. Given that SSR frameworks will evolve long after the conclusion of peace negotiations, flexibility is important to ensure that parties are not tightly bound to decisions (e.g. on force size) that later prove unrealistic. However, agreement on the broad frameworks of subsequent SSR processes, especially commitments to consultative mechanisms, can provide parties with confidence in and commitment to both the initial DDR programme and recognition of the linkages with longer term SSR requirements. The provision of both DDR and SSR expertise within negotiations can ensure coherence between the two processes. In particular, it is important that advisers promote a broad understanding of SSR that links reform of security providers to issues of management, oversight and accountability. Providing expertise drawn from the same region and ensuring a role for regional political organisations in negotiations may provide additional credibility through their contextual awareness and legitimacy.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193125,7 +193125,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3040, "Paragraph": "Where feasible, decisions within peace agreements on demobilization and retention of ex-combatants should be informed by the needs of the future security sector. Level 6 Linkages with other Processes DDR and Security Sector Reform 21 6.10 needs of the future security sector. Given that SSR frameworks will evolve long after the conclusion of peace negotiations, flexibility is important to ensure that parties are not tightly bound to decisions (e.g. on force size) that later prove unrealistic. However, agreement on the broad frameworks of subsequent SSR processes, especially commitments to consultative mechanisms, can provide parties with confidence in and commitment to both the initial DDR programme and recognition of the linkages with longer term SSR requirements. The provision of both DDR and SSR expertise within negotiations can ensure coherence between the two processes. In particular, it is important that advisers promote a broad understanding of SSR that links reform of security providers to issues of management, oversight and accountability. Providing expertise drawn from the same region and ensuring a role for regional political organisations in negotiations may provide additional credibility through their contextual awareness and legitimacy.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193143,7 +193143,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3041, "Paragraph": "Transitional political arrangements offer clear entry points and opportunities to link DDR and SSR. In particular, transitional arrangements often have a high degree of legitimacy when they are linked to peace agreements and can be used to prepare the ground for longer term reform processes. However, a programmatic approach to SSR that offers opportunities to link DDR to longer term governance objectives may require levels of political will and legiti- mate governance institutions that will most likely only follow the successful completion of national elections that meet minimum democratic standards.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193161,7 +193161,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3041, "Paragraph": "Transitional political arrangements offer clear entry points and opportunities to link DDR and SSR. In particular, transitional arrangements often have a high degree of legitimacy when they are linked to peace agreements and can be used to prepare the ground for longer term reform processes. However, a programmatic approach to SSR that offers opportunities to link DDR to longer term governance objectives may require levels of political will and legiti- mate governance institutions that will most likely only follow the successful completion of national elections that meet minimum democratic standards.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193179,7 +193179,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3041, "Paragraph": "Transitional political arrangements offer clear entry points and opportunities to link DDR and SSR. In particular, transitional arrangements often have a high degree of legitimacy when they are linked to peace agreements and can be used to prepare the ground for longer term reform processes. However, a programmatic approach to SSR that offers opportunities to link DDR to longer term governance objectives may require levels of political will and legiti- mate governance institutions that will most likely only follow the successful completion of national elections that meet minimum democratic standards.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193197,7 +193197,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3042, "Paragraph": "During transitional periods prior to national elections, SSR activities should address immediate security needs linked to the DDR process while supporting the development of sustainable national capacities. Building management capacity, promoting an active civil society role and identifying practical measures such as a security sector census or improved payroll system can enhance the long term effectiveness and sustainability of DDR and SSR programmes. In the absence of appropriate oversight mechanisms for the security sector, supporting an ad hoc mechanism to oversee the DDR process, which includes a coordina- tion mechanism for DDR and SSR, should be considered. Such provision should include the subsequent transfer of competencies to formal oversight bodies.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193215,7 +193215,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3042, "Paragraph": "During transitional periods prior to national elections, SSR activities should address immediate security needs linked to the DDR process while supporting the development of sustainable national capacities. Building management capacity, promoting an active civil society role and identifying practical measures such as a security sector census or improved payroll system can enhance the long term effectiveness and sustainability of DDR and SSR programmes. In the absence of appropriate oversight mechanisms for the security sector, supporting an ad hoc mechanism to oversee the DDR process, which includes a coordina- tion mechanism for DDR and SSR, should be considered. Such provision should include the subsequent transfer of competencies to formal oversight bodies.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193233,7 +193233,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3042, "Paragraph": "During transitional periods prior to national elections, SSR activities should address immediate security needs linked to the DDR process while supporting the development of sustainable national capacities. Building management capacity, promoting an active civil society role and identifying practical measures such as a security sector census or improved payroll system can enhance the long term effectiveness and sustainability of DDR and SSR programmes. In the absence of appropriate oversight mechanisms for the security sector, supporting an ad hoc mechanism to oversee the DDR process, which includes a coordina- tion mechanism for DDR and SSR, should be considered. Such provision should include the subsequent transfer of competencies to formal oversight bodies.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193251,7 +193251,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3042, "Paragraph": "During transitional periods prior to national elections, SSR activities should address immediate security needs linked to the DDR process while supporting the development of sustainable national capacities. Building management capacity, promoting an active civil society role and identifying practical measures such as a security sector census or improved payroll system can enhance the long term effectiveness and sustainability of DDR and SSR programmes. In the absence of appropriate oversight mechanisms for the security sector, supporting an ad hoc mechanism to oversee the DDR process, which includes a coordina- tion mechanism for DDR and SSR, should be considered. Such provision should include the subsequent transfer of competencies to formal oversight bodies.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193269,7 +193269,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3043, "Paragraph": "Elections should serve as an entry point for discussions on DDR and SSR. While successful elections can provide important legitimacy for DDR and SSR processes, they tend to mono- polise the available political space and thus strongly influence timelines and priorities, including resource allocation for DDR and SSR. Army integration may be prioritised in order to support the provision of effective security forces for election security while SSR measures may be designed around the development of an election security plan which brings together the different actors involved.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193287,7 +193287,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3043, "Paragraph": "Elections should serve as an entry point for discussions on DDR and SSR. While successful elections can provide important legitimacy for DDR and SSR processes, they tend to mono- polise the available political space and thus strongly influence timelines and priorities, including resource allocation for DDR and SSR. Army integration may be prioritised in order to support the provision of effective security forces for election security while SSR measures may be designed around the development of an election security plan which brings together the different actors involved.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193305,7 +193305,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3043, "Paragraph": "Elections should serve as an entry point for discussions on DDR and SSR. While successful elections can provide important legitimacy for DDR and SSR processes, they tend to mono- polise the available political space and thus strongly influence timelines and priorities, including resource allocation for DDR and SSR. Army integration may be prioritised in order to support the provision of effective security forces for election security while SSR measures may be designed around the development of an election security plan which brings together the different actors involved.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193323,7 +193323,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3044, "Paragraph": "Election security can provide a useful catalyst for discussion on the roles and respon- sibilities of different security actors. It may also result in a focus on capacity building for police and other bodies with a role in elections. Priority setting and planning around sup- port for elections should be linked to longer term SSR priorities. In particular, criteria for entry and training for ex-combatants integrating within the security sector should be con- sistent with the broader values and approaches that underpin the SSR process.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193341,7 +193341,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3044, "Paragraph": "Election security can provide a useful catalyst for discussion on the roles and respon- sibilities of different security actors. It may also result in a focus on capacity building for police and other bodies with a role in elections. Priority setting and planning around sup- port for elections should be linked to longer term SSR priorities. In particular, criteria for entry and training for ex-combatants integrating within the security sector should be con- sistent with the broader values and approaches that underpin the SSR process.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193359,7 +193359,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3044, "Paragraph": "Election security can provide a useful catalyst for discussion on the roles and respon- sibilities of different security actors. It may also result in a focus on capacity building for police and other bodies with a role in elections. Priority setting and planning around sup- port for elections should be linked to longer term SSR priorities. In particular, criteria for entry and training for ex-combatants integrating within the security sector should be con- sistent with the broader values and approaches that underpin the SSR process.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193377,7 +193377,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3044, "Paragraph": "Election security can provide a useful catalyst for discussion on the roles and respon- sibilities of different security actors. It may also result in a focus on capacity building for police and other bodies with a role in elections. Priority setting and planning around sup- port for elections should be linked to longer term SSR priorities. In particular, criteria for entry and training for ex-combatants integrating within the security sector should be con- sistent with the broader values and approaches that underpin the SSR process.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193395,7 +193395,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3045, "Paragraph": "National DDR commissions exist in many of the countries that embark on DDR processes and are used to coordinate government authorities and international entities that support the national DDR programme (see IDDRS 3.30 on National Institutions for DDR). National DDR commissions therefore provide an impo", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193413,7 +193413,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3045, "Paragraph": "National DDR commissions exist in many of the countries that embark on DDR processes and are used to coordinate government authorities and international entities that support the national DDR programme (see IDDRS 3.30 on National Institutions for DDR). National DDR commissions therefore provide an impo", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193431,7 +193431,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3046, "Paragraph": "The ToRs of National DDR commissions may provide an opportunity to link national DDR and SSR capacities. For example, the commission may share information with rele- vant Ministries (beyond the Ministry of Defence) such as Justice and the Interior as well as the legislative and civil society. Depending on the context, national commissions may be- come permanent parts of the national security sector governance architecture. This can help to ensure that capacities developed in support of a DDR programme are retained within the system beyond the lifespan of the DDR process itself.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193449,7 +193449,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3046, "Paragraph": "The ToRs of National DDR commissions may provide an opportunity to link national DDR and SSR capacities. For example, the commission may share information with rele- vant Ministries (beyond the Ministry of Defence) such as Justice and the Interior as well as the legislative and civil society. Depending on the context, national commissions may be- come permanent parts of the national security sector governance architecture. This can help to ensure that capacities developed in support of a DDR programme are retained within the system beyond the lifespan of the DDR process itself.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193467,7 +193467,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3046, "Paragraph": "The ToRs of National DDR commissions may provide an opportunity to link national DDR and SSR capacities. For example, the commission may share information with rele- vant Ministries (beyond the Ministry of Defence) such as Justice and the Interior as well as the legislative and civil society. Depending on the context, national commissions may be- come permanent parts of the national security sector governance architecture. This can help to ensure that capacities developed in support of a DDR programme are retained within the system beyond the lifespan of the DDR process itself.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193485,7 +193485,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3046, "Paragraph": "The ToRs of National DDR commissions may provide an opportunity to link national DDR and SSR capacities. For example, the commission may share information with rele- vant Ministries (beyond the Ministry of Defence) such as Justice and the Interior as well as the legislative and civil society. Depending on the context, national commissions may be- come permanent parts of the national security sector governance architecture. This can help to ensure that capacities developed in support of a DDR programme are retained within the system beyond the lifespan of the DDR process itself.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193503,7 +193503,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3047, "Paragraph": "This section addresses the common challenge of operationalising national ownership in DDR and SSR programmes. It then considers how to enhance synergies in international support for DDR and SSR.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193521,7 +193521,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3047, "Paragraph": "This section addresses the common challenge of operationalising national ownership in DDR and SSR programmes. It then considers how to enhance synergies in international support for DDR and SSR.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193539,7 +193539,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3048, "Paragraph": "Weak institutions and limited capacities are frequently cited as impediments to national ownership in post-conflict contexts. However, this points to the need for a dual focus on supporting transparent, inclusive national decision-making combined with the develop- ment of sustainable national capacities. Due attention to national ownership is therefore critical to addressing challenges of legitimacy and sustainability that are common to DDR and SSR.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193557,7 +193557,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3048, "Paragraph": "Weak institutions and limited capacities are frequently cited as impediments to national ownership in post-conflict contexts. However, this points to the need for a dual focus on supporting transparent, inclusive national decision-making combined with the develop- ment of sustainable national capacities. Due attention to national ownership is therefore critical to addressing challenges of legitimacy and sustainability that are common to DDR and SSR.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193575,7 +193575,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3048, "Paragraph": "Weak institutions and limited capacities are frequently cited as impediments to national ownership in post-conflict contexts. However, this points to the need for a dual focus on supporting transparent, inclusive national decision-making combined with the develop- ment of sustainable national capacities. Due attention to national ownership is therefore critical to addressing challenges of legitimacy and sustainability that are common to DDR and SSR.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193593,7 +193593,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3049, "Paragraph": "National ownership extends beyond central government to include a wide range of actors with a role in security provision, management and oversight. An important component of the DDR assessment phase should therefore be to identify national stakeholders that can contribute to the process. Supporting the meaningful involvement of parliament, civil soci- ety as well as local authorities and communities in DDR and SSR decision-making can help ensure that programmes are realistic and respond to local needs. The development of a comprehensive national security strategy (NSS) or narrower, sector specific strategies can (and should) be a lengthy process that continues after DDR is underway. However, insights drawn from discussions at national and local levels should be reflected in the de- sign, implementation and sequencing of DDR and SSR programmes.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193611,7 +193611,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3049, "Paragraph": "National ownership extends beyond central government to include a wide range of actors with a role in security provision, management and oversight. An important component of the DDR assessment phase should therefore be to identify national stakeholders that can contribute to the process. Supporting the meaningful involvement of parliament, civil soci- ety as well as local authorities and communities in DDR and SSR decision-making can help ensure that programmes are realistic and respond to local needs. The development of a comprehensive national security strategy (NSS) or narrower, sector specific strategies can (and should) be a lengthy process that continues after DDR is underway. However, insights drawn from discussions at national and local levels should be reflected in the de- sign, implementation and sequencing of DDR and SSR programmes.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193629,7 +193629,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3049, "Paragraph": "National ownership extends beyond central government to include a wide range of actors with a role in security provision, management and oversight. An important component of the DDR assessment phase should therefore be to identify national stakeholders that can contribute to the process. Supporting the meaningful involvement of parliament, civil soci- ety as well as local authorities and communities in DDR and SSR decision-making can help ensure that programmes are realistic and respond to local needs. The development of a comprehensive national security strategy (NSS) or narrower, sector specific strategies can (and should) be a lengthy process that continues after DDR is underway. However, insights drawn from discussions at national and local levels should be reflected in the de- sign, implementation and sequencing of DDR and SSR programmes.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193647,7 +193647,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3049, "Paragraph": "National ownership extends beyond central government to include a wide range of actors with a role in security provision, management and oversight. An important component of the DDR assessment phase should therefore be to identify national stakeholders that can contribute to the process. Supporting the meaningful involvement of parliament, civil soci- ety as well as local authorities and communities in DDR and SSR decision-making can help ensure that programmes are realistic and respond to local needs. The development of a comprehensive national security strategy (NSS) or narrower, sector specific strategies can (and should) be a lengthy process that continues after DDR is underway. However, insights drawn from discussions at national and local levels should be reflected in the de- sign, implementation and sequencing of DDR and SSR programmes.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193665,7 +193665,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3049, "Paragraph": "National ownership extends beyond central government to include a wide range of actors with a role in security provision, management and oversight. An important component of the DDR assessment phase should therefore be to identify national stakeholders that can contribute to the process. Supporting the meaningful involvement of parliament, civil soci- ety as well as local authorities and communities in DDR and SSR decision-making can help ensure that programmes are realistic and respond to local needs. The development of a comprehensive national security strategy (NSS) or narrower, sector specific strategies can (and should) be a lengthy process that continues after DDR is underway. However, insights drawn from discussions at national and local levels should be reflected in the de- sign, implementation and sequencing of DDR and SSR programmes.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193683,7 +193683,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3050, "Paragraph": "A process of national dialogue (see 9.4.1.) can help shape DDR\/SSR frameworks that are underpinned by context-specific political and security considerations. Processes enacted to develop national or sector-specific security strategies should inform priorities and har- monise the roles of actors involved in both DDR and SSR (see Box 7). Participation should be encouraged from relevant government ministries (e.g. interior, finance, defence, intelli- gence, police, justice, immigration, health, education, labour, social welfare, gender, national HIV\/AIDS Programme Councils), as well as legislative committees and financial manage- ment bodies. Civil society represents a key target group in helping to build trust, fostering \u2018buy in\u2019 and avoiding perceptions that the security sector is de-linked from the needs of citizens. Community consultations and communications strategies should be developed with national and local media to enhance dialogue processes in support of DDR and SSR programmes.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193701,7 +193701,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3050, "Paragraph": "A process of national dialogue (see 9.4.1.) can help shape DDR\/SSR frameworks that are underpinned by context-specific political and security considerations. Processes enacted to develop national or sector-specific security strategies should inform priorities and har- monise the roles of actors involved in both DDR and SSR (see Box 7). Participation should be encouraged from relevant government ministries (e.g. interior, finance, defence, intelli- gence, police, justice, immigration, health, education, labour, social welfare, gender, national HIV\/AIDS Programme Councils), as well as legislative committees and financial manage- ment bodies. Civil society represents a key target group in helping to build trust, fostering \u2018buy in\u2019 and avoiding perceptions that the security sector is de-linked from the needs of citizens. Community consultations and communications strategies should be developed with national and local media to enhance dialogue processes in support of DDR and SSR programmes.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193719,7 +193719,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3050, "Paragraph": "A process of national dialogue (see 9.4.1.) can help shape DDR\/SSR frameworks that are underpinned by context-specific political and security considerations. Processes enacted to develop national or sector-specific security strategies should inform priorities and har- monise the roles of actors involved in both DDR and SSR (see Box 7). Participation should be encouraged from relevant government ministries (e.g. interior, finance, defence, intelli- gence, police, justice, immigration, health, education, labour, social welfare, gender, national HIV\/AIDS Programme Councils), as well as legislative committees and financial manage- ment bodies. Civil society represents a key target group in helping to build trust, fostering \u2018buy in\u2019 and avoiding perceptions that the security sector is de-linked from the needs of citizens. Community consultations and communications strategies should be developed with national and local media to enhance dialogue processes in support of DDR and SSR programmes.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193737,7 +193737,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3050, "Paragraph": "A process of national dialogue (see 9.4.1.) can help shape DDR\/SSR frameworks that are underpinned by context-specific political and security considerations. Processes enacted to develop national or sector-specific security strategies should inform priorities and har- monise the roles of actors involved in both DDR and SSR (see Box 7). Participation should be encouraged from relevant government ministries (e.g. interior, finance, defence, intelli- gence, police, justice, immigration, health, education, labour, social welfare, gender, national HIV\/AIDS Programme Councils), as well as legislative committees and financial manage- ment bodies. Civil society represents a key target group in helping to build trust, fostering \u2018buy in\u2019 and avoiding perceptions that the security sector is de-linked from the needs of citizens. Community consultations and communications strategies should be developed with national and local media to enhance dialogue processes in support of DDR and SSR programmes.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193755,7 +193755,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3050, "Paragraph": "A process of national dialogue (see 9.4.1.) can help shape DDR\/SSR frameworks that are underpinned by context-specific political and security considerations. Processes enacted to develop national or sector-specific security strategies should inform priorities and har- monise the roles of actors involved in both DDR and SSR (see Box 7). Participation should be encouraged from relevant government ministries (e.g. interior, finance, defence, intelli- gence, police, justice, immigration, health, education, labour, social welfare, gender, national HIV\/AIDS Programme Councils), as well as legislative committees and financial manage- ment bodies. Civil society represents a key target group in helping to build trust, fostering \u2018buy in\u2019 and avoiding perceptions that the security sector is de-linked from the needs of citizens. Community consultations and communications strategies should be developed with national and local media to enhance dialogue processes in support of DDR and SSR programmes.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193773,7 +193773,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3050, "Paragraph": "A process of national dialogue (see 9.4.1.) can help shape DDR\/SSR frameworks that are underpinned by context-specific political and security considerations. Processes enacted to develop national or sector-specific security strategies should inform priorities and har- monise the roles of actors involved in both DDR and SSR (see Box 7). Participation should be encouraged from relevant government ministries (e.g. interior, finance, defence, intelli- gence, police, justice, immigration, health, education, labour, social welfare, gender, national HIV\/AIDS Programme Councils), as well as legislative committees and financial manage- ment bodies. Civil society represents a key target group in helping to build trust, fostering \u2018buy in\u2019 and avoiding perceptions that the security sector is de-linked from the needs of citizens. Community consultations and communications strategies should be developed with national and local media to enhance dialogue processes in support of DDR and SSR programmes.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193791,7 +193791,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3050, "Paragraph": "A process of national dialogue (see 9.4.1.) can help shape DDR\/SSR frameworks that are underpinned by context-specific political and security considerations. Processes enacted to develop national or sector-specific security strategies should inform priorities and har- monise the roles of actors involved in both DDR and SSR (see Box 7). Participation should be encouraged from relevant government ministries (e.g. interior, finance, defence, intelli- gence, police, justice, immigration, health, education, labour, social welfare, gender, national HIV\/AIDS Programme Councils), as well as legislative committees and financial manage- ment bodies. Civil society represents a key target group in helping to build trust, fostering \u2018buy in\u2019 and avoiding perceptions that the security sector is de-linked from the needs of citizens. Community consultations and communications strategies should be developed with national and local media to enhance dialogue processes in support of DDR and SSR programmes.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193807,9 +193807,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3051, - "Paragraph": "Box 7 Constructing a national vision of security \\n Key questions: \\n Is there sufficient trust between national stakeholders to support the development of a national vision of security? If not, what enabling steps can be taken to build confidence in this process? \\n What are the most important current and future threats and challenges (both internal and external) to national security? \\n What is the role of the security sector and what values should underpin its work? \\n What are the security needs of communities and individuals, including the special needs of women, girls and vulnerable groups? \\n What areas should be granted priority in order to address these threats? \\n How should available resources be divided between competing public needs? \\n Do current mandates, capacities, resources and division of responsibilities reflect these threats? \\n What can be done to ensure that the objectives identified will be implemented? Who is responsible for and how effective is oversight and accountability of the security sector?", + "Paragraph": "Box 7 Constructing a national vision of security \n Key questions: \n Is there sufficient trust between national stakeholders to support the development of a national vision of security? If not, what enabling steps can be taken to build confidence in this process? \n What are the most important current and future threats and challenges (both internal and external) to national security? \n What is the role of the security sector and what values should underpin its work? \n What are the security needs of communities and individuals, including the special needs of women, girls and vulnerable groups? \n What areas should be granted priority in order to address these threats? \n How should available resources be divided between competing public needs? \n Do current mandates, capacities, resources and division of responsibilities reflect these threats? \n What can be done to ensure that the objectives identified will be implemented? Who is responsible for and how effective is oversight and accountability of the security sector?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193818,16 +193818,16 @@ "Heading2": "10.1. National ownership", "Heading3": "10.1.1. Participation and consultation", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Box 7 Constructing a national vision of security \\n Key questions: \\n Is there sufficient trust between national stakeholders to support the development of a national vision of security?", + "Sentence": "Box 7 Constructing a national vision of security \n Key questions: \n Is there sufficient trust between national stakeholders to support the development of a national vision of security?", "newParagraph": "box 7 constructing national vision security n key question n sufficient trust national stakeholder support development national vision security enabling step taken build confidence process n important current future threat challenge internal external national security n role security sector value underpin work n security need community individual including special need woman girl vulnerable group n area granted priority order address threat n available resource divided competing public need n current mandate capacity resource division responsibility reflect threat n done ensure objective identified implemented responsible effective oversight accountability security sector", "ProcessedSent": "box 7 constructing national vision security n key question n sufficient trust national stakeholder support development national vision security", "SentID": 10767 }, { "ParagraphID": 3051, - "Paragraph": "Box 7 Constructing a national vision of security \\n Key questions: \\n Is there sufficient trust between national stakeholders to support the development of a national vision of security? If not, what enabling steps can be taken to build confidence in this process? \\n What are the most important current and future threats and challenges (both internal and external) to national security? \\n What is the role of the security sector and what values should underpin its work? \\n What are the security needs of communities and individuals, including the special needs of women, girls and vulnerable groups? \\n What areas should be granted priority in order to address these threats? \\n How should available resources be divided between competing public needs? \\n Do current mandates, capacities, resources and division of responsibilities reflect these threats? \\n What can be done to ensure that the objectives identified will be implemented? Who is responsible for and how effective is oversight and accountability of the security sector?", + "Paragraph": "Box 7 Constructing a national vision of security \n Key questions: \n Is there sufficient trust between national stakeholders to support the development of a national vision of security? If not, what enabling steps can be taken to build confidence in this process? \n What are the most important current and future threats and challenges (both internal and external) to national security? \n What is the role of the security sector and what values should underpin its work? \n What are the security needs of communities and individuals, including the special needs of women, girls and vulnerable groups? \n What areas should be granted priority in order to address these threats? \n How should available resources be divided between competing public needs? \n Do current mandates, capacities, resources and division of responsibilities reflect these threats? \n What can be done to ensure that the objectives identified will be implemented? Who is responsible for and how effective is oversight and accountability of the security sector?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193843,9 +193843,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3051, - "Paragraph": "Box 7 Constructing a national vision of security \\n Key questions: \\n Is there sufficient trust between national stakeholders to support the development of a national vision of security? If not, what enabling steps can be taken to build confidence in this process? \\n What are the most important current and future threats and challenges (both internal and external) to national security? \\n What is the role of the security sector and what values should underpin its work? \\n What are the security needs of communities and individuals, including the special needs of women, girls and vulnerable groups? \\n What areas should be granted priority in order to address these threats? \\n How should available resources be divided between competing public needs? \\n Do current mandates, capacities, resources and division of responsibilities reflect these threats? \\n What can be done to ensure that the objectives identified will be implemented? Who is responsible for and how effective is oversight and accountability of the security sector?", + "Paragraph": "Box 7 Constructing a national vision of security \n Key questions: \n Is there sufficient trust between national stakeholders to support the development of a national vision of security? If not, what enabling steps can be taken to build confidence in this process? \n What are the most important current and future threats and challenges (both internal and external) to national security? \n What is the role of the security sector and what values should underpin its work? \n What are the security needs of communities and individuals, including the special needs of women, girls and vulnerable groups? \n What areas should be granted priority in order to address these threats? \n How should available resources be divided between competing public needs? \n Do current mandates, capacities, resources and division of responsibilities reflect these threats? \n What can be done to ensure that the objectives identified will be implemented? Who is responsible for and how effective is oversight and accountability of the security sector?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193854,16 +193854,16 @@ "Heading2": "10.1. National ownership", "Heading3": "10.1.1. Participation and consultation", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are the most important current and future threats and challenges (both internal and external) to national security?", + "Sentence": "\n What are the most important current and future threats and challenges (both internal and external) to national security?", "newParagraph": "box 7 constructing national vision security n key question n sufficient trust national stakeholder support development national vision security enabling step taken build confidence process n important current future threat challenge internal external national security n role security sector value underpin work n security need community individual including special need woman girl vulnerable group n area granted priority order address threat n available resource divided competing public need n current mandate capacity resource division responsibility reflect threat n done ensure objective identified implemented responsible effective oversight accountability security sector", "ProcessedSent": "n important current future threat challenge internal external national security", "SentID": 10769 }, { "ParagraphID": 3051, - "Paragraph": "Box 7 Constructing a national vision of security \\n Key questions: \\n Is there sufficient trust between national stakeholders to support the development of a national vision of security? If not, what enabling steps can be taken to build confidence in this process? \\n What are the most important current and future threats and challenges (both internal and external) to national security? \\n What is the role of the security sector and what values should underpin its work? \\n What are the security needs of communities and individuals, including the special needs of women, girls and vulnerable groups? \\n What areas should be granted priority in order to address these threats? \\n How should available resources be divided between competing public needs? \\n Do current mandates, capacities, resources and division of responsibilities reflect these threats? \\n What can be done to ensure that the objectives identified will be implemented? Who is responsible for and how effective is oversight and accountability of the security sector?", + "Paragraph": "Box 7 Constructing a national vision of security \n Key questions: \n Is there sufficient trust between national stakeholders to support the development of a national vision of security? If not, what enabling steps can be taken to build confidence in this process? \n What are the most important current and future threats and challenges (both internal and external) to national security? \n What is the role of the security sector and what values should underpin its work? \n What are the security needs of communities and individuals, including the special needs of women, girls and vulnerable groups? \n What areas should be granted priority in order to address these threats? \n How should available resources be divided between competing public needs? \n Do current mandates, capacities, resources and division of responsibilities reflect these threats? \n What can be done to ensure that the objectives identified will be implemented? Who is responsible for and how effective is oversight and accountability of the security sector?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193872,16 +193872,16 @@ "Heading2": "10.1. National ownership", "Heading3": "10.1.1. Participation and consultation", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What is the role of the security sector and what values should underpin its work?", + "Sentence": "\n What is the role of the security sector and what values should underpin its work?", "newParagraph": "box 7 constructing national vision security n key question n sufficient trust national stakeholder support development national vision security enabling step taken build confidence process n important current future threat challenge internal external national security n role security sector value underpin work n security need community individual including special need woman girl vulnerable group n area granted priority order address threat n available resource divided competing public need n current mandate capacity resource division responsibility reflect threat n done ensure objective identified implemented responsible effective oversight accountability security sector", "ProcessedSent": "n role security sector value underpin work", "SentID": 10770 }, { "ParagraphID": 3051, - "Paragraph": "Box 7 Constructing a national vision of security \\n Key questions: \\n Is there sufficient trust between national stakeholders to support the development of a national vision of security? If not, what enabling steps can be taken to build confidence in this process? \\n What are the most important current and future threats and challenges (both internal and external) to national security? \\n What is the role of the security sector and what values should underpin its work? \\n What are the security needs of communities and individuals, including the special needs of women, girls and vulnerable groups? \\n What areas should be granted priority in order to address these threats? \\n How should available resources be divided between competing public needs? \\n Do current mandates, capacities, resources and division of responsibilities reflect these threats? \\n What can be done to ensure that the objectives identified will be implemented? Who is responsible for and how effective is oversight and accountability of the security sector?", + "Paragraph": "Box 7 Constructing a national vision of security \n Key questions: \n Is there sufficient trust between national stakeholders to support the development of a national vision of security? If not, what enabling steps can be taken to build confidence in this process? \n What are the most important current and future threats and challenges (both internal and external) to national security? \n What is the role of the security sector and what values should underpin its work? \n What are the security needs of communities and individuals, including the special needs of women, girls and vulnerable groups? \n What areas should be granted priority in order to address these threats? \n How should available resources be divided between competing public needs? \n Do current mandates, capacities, resources and division of responsibilities reflect these threats? \n What can be done to ensure that the objectives identified will be implemented? Who is responsible for and how effective is oversight and accountability of the security sector?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193890,16 +193890,16 @@ "Heading2": "10.1. National ownership", "Heading3": "10.1.1. Participation and consultation", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are the security needs of communities and individuals, including the special needs of women, girls and vulnerable groups?", + "Sentence": "\n What are the security needs of communities and individuals, including the special needs of women, girls and vulnerable groups?", "newParagraph": "box 7 constructing national vision security n key question n sufficient trust national stakeholder support development national vision security enabling step taken build confidence process n important current future threat challenge internal external national security n role security sector value underpin work n security need community individual including special need woman girl vulnerable group n area granted priority order address threat n available resource divided competing public need n current mandate capacity resource division responsibility reflect threat n done ensure objective identified implemented responsible effective oversight accountability security sector", "ProcessedSent": "n security need community individual including special need woman girl vulnerable group", "SentID": 10771 }, { "ParagraphID": 3051, - "Paragraph": "Box 7 Constructing a national vision of security \\n Key questions: \\n Is there sufficient trust between national stakeholders to support the development of a national vision of security? If not, what enabling steps can be taken to build confidence in this process? \\n What are the most important current and future threats and challenges (both internal and external) to national security? \\n What is the role of the security sector and what values should underpin its work? \\n What are the security needs of communities and individuals, including the special needs of women, girls and vulnerable groups? \\n What areas should be granted priority in order to address these threats? \\n How should available resources be divided between competing public needs? \\n Do current mandates, capacities, resources and division of responsibilities reflect these threats? \\n What can be done to ensure that the objectives identified will be implemented? Who is responsible for and how effective is oversight and accountability of the security sector?", + "Paragraph": "Box 7 Constructing a national vision of security \n Key questions: \n Is there sufficient trust between national stakeholders to support the development of a national vision of security? If not, what enabling steps can be taken to build confidence in this process? \n What are the most important current and future threats and challenges (both internal and external) to national security? \n What is the role of the security sector and what values should underpin its work? \n What are the security needs of communities and individuals, including the special needs of women, girls and vulnerable groups? \n What areas should be granted priority in order to address these threats? \n How should available resources be divided between competing public needs? \n Do current mandates, capacities, resources and division of responsibilities reflect these threats? \n What can be done to ensure that the objectives identified will be implemented? Who is responsible for and how effective is oversight and accountability of the security sector?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193908,16 +193908,16 @@ "Heading2": "10.1. National ownership", "Heading3": "10.1.1. Participation and consultation", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What areas should be granted priority in order to address these threats?", + "Sentence": "\n What areas should be granted priority in order to address these threats?", "newParagraph": "box 7 constructing national vision security n key question n sufficient trust national stakeholder support development national vision security enabling step taken build confidence process n important current future threat challenge internal external national security n role security sector value underpin work n security need community individual including special need woman girl vulnerable group n area granted priority order address threat n available resource divided competing public need n current mandate capacity resource division responsibility reflect threat n done ensure objective identified implemented responsible effective oversight accountability security sector", "ProcessedSent": "n area granted priority order address threat", "SentID": 10772 }, { "ParagraphID": 3051, - "Paragraph": "Box 7 Constructing a national vision of security \\n Key questions: \\n Is there sufficient trust between national stakeholders to support the development of a national vision of security? If not, what enabling steps can be taken to build confidence in this process? \\n What are the most important current and future threats and challenges (both internal and external) to national security? \\n What is the role of the security sector and what values should underpin its work? \\n What are the security needs of communities and individuals, including the special needs of women, girls and vulnerable groups? \\n What areas should be granted priority in order to address these threats? \\n How should available resources be divided between competing public needs? \\n Do current mandates, capacities, resources and division of responsibilities reflect these threats? \\n What can be done to ensure that the objectives identified will be implemented? Who is responsible for and how effective is oversight and accountability of the security sector?", + "Paragraph": "Box 7 Constructing a national vision of security \n Key questions: \n Is there sufficient trust between national stakeholders to support the development of a national vision of security? If not, what enabling steps can be taken to build confidence in this process? \n What are the most important current and future threats and challenges (both internal and external) to national security? \n What is the role of the security sector and what values should underpin its work? \n What are the security needs of communities and individuals, including the special needs of women, girls and vulnerable groups? \n What areas should be granted priority in order to address these threats? \n How should available resources be divided between competing public needs? \n Do current mandates, capacities, resources and division of responsibilities reflect these threats? \n What can be done to ensure that the objectives identified will be implemented? Who is responsible for and how effective is oversight and accountability of the security sector?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193926,16 +193926,16 @@ "Heading2": "10.1. National ownership", "Heading3": "10.1.1. Participation and consultation", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n How should available resources be divided between competing public needs?", + "Sentence": "\n How should available resources be divided between competing public needs?", "newParagraph": "box 7 constructing national vision security n key question n sufficient trust national stakeholder support development national vision security enabling step taken build confidence process n important current future threat challenge internal external national security n role security sector value underpin work n security need community individual including special need woman girl vulnerable group n area granted priority order address threat n available resource divided competing public need n current mandate capacity resource division responsibility reflect threat n done ensure objective identified implemented responsible effective oversight accountability security sector", "ProcessedSent": "n available resource divided competing public need", "SentID": 10773 }, { "ParagraphID": 3051, - "Paragraph": "Box 7 Constructing a national vision of security \\n Key questions: \\n Is there sufficient trust between national stakeholders to support the development of a national vision of security? If not, what enabling steps can be taken to build confidence in this process? \\n What are the most important current and future threats and challenges (both internal and external) to national security? \\n What is the role of the security sector and what values should underpin its work? \\n What are the security needs of communities and individuals, including the special needs of women, girls and vulnerable groups? \\n What areas should be granted priority in order to address these threats? \\n How should available resources be divided between competing public needs? \\n Do current mandates, capacities, resources and division of responsibilities reflect these threats? \\n What can be done to ensure that the objectives identified will be implemented? Who is responsible for and how effective is oversight and accountability of the security sector?", + "Paragraph": "Box 7 Constructing a national vision of security \n Key questions: \n Is there sufficient trust between national stakeholders to support the development of a national vision of security? If not, what enabling steps can be taken to build confidence in this process? \n What are the most important current and future threats and challenges (both internal and external) to national security? \n What is the role of the security sector and what values should underpin its work? \n What are the security needs of communities and individuals, including the special needs of women, girls and vulnerable groups? \n What areas should be granted priority in order to address these threats? \n How should available resources be divided between competing public needs? \n Do current mandates, capacities, resources and division of responsibilities reflect these threats? \n What can be done to ensure that the objectives identified will be implemented? Who is responsible for and how effective is oversight and accountability of the security sector?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193944,16 +193944,16 @@ "Heading2": "10.1. National ownership", "Heading3": "10.1.1. Participation and consultation", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Do current mandates, capacities, resources and division of responsibilities reflect these threats?", + "Sentence": "\n Do current mandates, capacities, resources and division of responsibilities reflect these threats?", "newParagraph": "box 7 constructing national vision security n key question n sufficient trust national stakeholder support development national vision security enabling step taken build confidence process n important current future threat challenge internal external national security n role security sector value underpin work n security need community individual including special need woman girl vulnerable group n area granted priority order address threat n available resource divided competing public need n current mandate capacity resource division responsibility reflect threat n done ensure objective identified implemented responsible effective oversight accountability security sector", "ProcessedSent": "n current mandate capacity resource division responsibility reflect threat", "SentID": 10774 }, { "ParagraphID": 3051, - "Paragraph": "Box 7 Constructing a national vision of security \\n Key questions: \\n Is there sufficient trust between national stakeholders to support the development of a national vision of security? If not, what enabling steps can be taken to build confidence in this process? \\n What are the most important current and future threats and challenges (both internal and external) to national security? \\n What is the role of the security sector and what values should underpin its work? \\n What are the security needs of communities and individuals, including the special needs of women, girls and vulnerable groups? \\n What areas should be granted priority in order to address these threats? \\n How should available resources be divided between competing public needs? \\n Do current mandates, capacities, resources and division of responsibilities reflect these threats? \\n What can be done to ensure that the objectives identified will be implemented? Who is responsible for and how effective is oversight and accountability of the security sector?", + "Paragraph": "Box 7 Constructing a national vision of security \n Key questions: \n Is there sufficient trust between national stakeholders to support the development of a national vision of security? If not, what enabling steps can be taken to build confidence in this process? \n What are the most important current and future threats and challenges (both internal and external) to national security? \n What is the role of the security sector and what values should underpin its work? \n What are the security needs of communities and individuals, including the special needs of women, girls and vulnerable groups? \n What areas should be granted priority in order to address these threats? \n How should available resources be divided between competing public needs? \n Do current mandates, capacities, resources and division of responsibilities reflect these threats? \n What can be done to ensure that the objectives identified will be implemented? Who is responsible for and how effective is oversight and accountability of the security sector?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193962,16 +193962,16 @@ "Heading2": "10.1. National ownership", "Heading3": "10.1.1. Participation and consultation", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What can be done to ensure that the objectives identified will be implemented?", + "Sentence": "\n What can be done to ensure that the objectives identified will be implemented?", "newParagraph": "box 7 constructing national vision security n key question n sufficient trust national stakeholder support development national vision security enabling step taken build confidence process n important current future threat challenge internal external national security n role security sector value underpin work n security need community individual including special need woman girl vulnerable group n area granted priority order address threat n available resource divided competing public need n current mandate capacity resource division responsibility reflect threat n done ensure objective identified implemented responsible effective oversight accountability security sector", "ProcessedSent": "n done ensure objective identified implemented", "SentID": 10775 }, { "ParagraphID": 3051, - "Paragraph": "Box 7 Constructing a national vision of security \\n Key questions: \\n Is there sufficient trust between national stakeholders to support the development of a national vision of security? If not, what enabling steps can be taken to build confidence in this process? \\n What are the most important current and future threats and challenges (both internal and external) to national security? \\n What is the role of the security sector and what values should underpin its work? \\n What are the security needs of communities and individuals, including the special needs of women, girls and vulnerable groups? \\n What areas should be granted priority in order to address these threats? \\n How should available resources be divided between competing public needs? \\n Do current mandates, capacities, resources and division of responsibilities reflect these threats? \\n What can be done to ensure that the objectives identified will be implemented? Who is responsible for and how effective is oversight and accountability of the security sector?", + "Paragraph": "Box 7 Constructing a national vision of security \n Key questions: \n Is there sufficient trust between national stakeholders to support the development of a national vision of security? If not, what enabling steps can be taken to build confidence in this process? \n What are the most important current and future threats and challenges (both internal and external) to national security? \n What is the role of the security sector and what values should underpin its work? \n What are the security needs of communities and individuals, including the special needs of women, girls and vulnerable groups? \n What areas should be granted priority in order to address these threats? \n How should available resources be divided between competing public needs? \n Do current mandates, capacities, resources and division of responsibilities reflect these threats? \n What can be done to ensure that the objectives identified will be implemented? Who is responsible for and how effective is oversight and accountability of the security sector?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -193989,7 +193989,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3052, "Paragraph": "Supporting the development of relevant national capacities to develop, manage and imple- ment programmes enhances the effectiveness of DDR and SSR while creating cross-cutting skills that contribute to the long term integrity of security institutions. Given their experi- ence, ex-combatants may play a significant role in these areas at national and community levels. In particular, a focus on security sector management and oversight provides an important means of contributing to sustainable national capacities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194007,7 +194007,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3052, "Paragraph": "Supporting the development of relevant national capacities to develop, manage and imple- ment programmes enhances the effectiveness of DDR and SSR while creating cross-cutting skills that contribute to the long term integrity of security institutions. Given their experi- ence, ex-combatants may play a significant role in these areas at national and community levels. In particular, a focus on security sector management and oversight provides an important means of contributing to sustainable national capacities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194025,7 +194025,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3052, "Paragraph": "Supporting the development of relevant national capacities to develop, manage and imple- ment programmes enhances the effectiveness of DDR and SSR while creating cross-cutting skills that contribute to the long term integrity of security institutions. Given their experi- ence, ex-combatants may play a significant role in these areas at national and community levels. In particular, a focus on security sector management and oversight provides an important means of contributing to sustainable national capacities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194043,7 +194043,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3053, "Paragraph": "Identifying national capacity gaps linked to DDR\/SSR should be an important objec- tive of needs assessments (see Box 6). Opportunities to develop cross-cutting skills (e.g. strategic planning, human resources, financial management, including gender budgeting, communications and outreach) should be agreed and prioritised with national authorities. Measures to enhance national capacities for democratic control and civilian oversight and to develop effective checks and balances within a clear legal framework are particularly important. Support for parliaments in fulfilling their oversight function can promote trans- parency and therefore trust in programmes and their use of resources.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194061,7 +194061,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3053, "Paragraph": "Identifying national capacity gaps linked to DDR\/SSR should be an important objec- tive of needs assessments (see Box 6). Opportunities to develop cross-cutting skills (e.g. strategic planning, human resources, financial management, including gender budgeting, communications and outreach) should be agreed and prioritised with national authorities. Measures to enhance national capacities for democratic control and civilian oversight and to develop effective checks and balances within a clear legal framework are particularly important. Support for parliaments in fulfilling their oversight function can promote trans- parency and therefore trust in programmes and their use of resources.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194079,7 +194079,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3053, "Paragraph": "Identifying national capacity gaps linked to DDR\/SSR should be an important objec- tive of needs assessments (see Box 6). Opportunities to develop cross-cutting skills (e.g. strategic planning, human resources, financial management, including gender budgeting, communications and outreach) should be agreed and prioritised with national authorities. Measures to enhance national capacities for democratic control and civilian oversight and to develop effective checks and balances within a clear legal framework are particularly important. Support for parliaments in fulfilling their oversight function can promote trans- parency and therefore trust in programmes and their use of resources.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194097,7 +194097,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3053, "Paragraph": "Identifying national capacity gaps linked to DDR\/SSR should be an important objec- tive of needs assessments (see Box 6). Opportunities to develop cross-cutting skills (e.g. strategic planning, human resources, financial management, including gender budgeting, communications and outreach) should be agreed and prioritised with national authorities. Measures to enhance national capacities for democratic control and civilian oversight and to develop effective checks and balances within a clear legal framework are particularly important. Support for parliaments in fulfilling their oversight function can promote trans- parency and therefore trust in programmes and their use of resources.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194115,7 +194115,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3053, "Paragraph": "Identifying national capacity gaps linked to DDR\/SSR should be an important objec- tive of needs assessments (see Box 6). Opportunities to develop cross-cutting skills (e.g. strategic planning, human resources, financial management, including gender budgeting, communications and outreach) should be agreed and prioritised with national authorities. Measures to enhance national capacities for democratic control and civilian oversight and to develop effective checks and balances within a clear legal framework are particularly important. Support for parliaments in fulfilling their oversight function can promote trans- parency and therefore trust in programmes and their use of resources.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194133,7 +194133,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3054, "Paragraph": "The politically sensitive nature of decisions relating to DDR and SSR means that external actors must pay particular attention to both the form and substance of their engagement. Close understanding of context, including identification of key stakeholders, is essential to ensure that support to national actors is realistic, culturally sensitive and sustainable. Externally- driven pressure to move forward on programming priorities will be counter-productive if this is de-linked from necessary political will and implementation capacity to develop policy and implement programmes at the national level.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194151,7 +194151,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3054, "Paragraph": "The politically sensitive nature of decisions relating to DDR and SSR means that external actors must pay particular attention to both the form and substance of their engagement. Close understanding of context, including identification of key stakeholders, is essential to ensure that support to national actors is realistic, culturally sensitive and sustainable. Externally- driven pressure to move forward on programming priorities will be counter-productive if this is de-linked from necessary political will and implementation capacity to develop policy and implement programmes at the national level.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194169,7 +194169,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3054, "Paragraph": "The politically sensitive nature of decisions relating to DDR and SSR means that external actors must pay particular attention to both the form and substance of their engagement. Close understanding of context, including identification of key stakeholders, is essential to ensure that support to national actors is realistic, culturally sensitive and sustainable. Externally- driven pressure to move forward on programming priorities will be counter-productive if this is de-linked from necessary political will and implementation capacity to develop policy and implement programmes at the national level.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194187,7 +194187,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3055, "Paragraph": "The design, implementation and timing of external support for DDR and SSR should be closely aligned with national priorities and capacities (see Boxes 6, 7 and 8). Given that activities may raise concerns over interference in areas of national sovereignty, design and approach should be carefully framed. In certain cases, \u201cdevelopment\u201d or \u201cprofessionalisation\u201d rather than \u201creform\u201d may represent more acceptable terminology. Setting out DDR\/SSR commitments in a joint letter of agreement and regularly monitoring implementation pro- vides a transparent means to set out agreed commitments between national authorities and the international community.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194205,7 +194205,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3055, "Paragraph": "The design, implementation and timing of external support for DDR and SSR should be closely aligned with national priorities and capacities (see Boxes 6, 7 and 8). Given that activities may raise concerns over interference in areas of national sovereignty, design and approach should be carefully framed. In certain cases, \u201cdevelopment\u201d or \u201cprofessionalisation\u201d rather than \u201creform\u201d may represent more acceptable terminology. Setting out DDR\/SSR commitments in a joint letter of agreement and regularly monitoring implementation pro- vides a transparent means to set out agreed commitments between national authorities and the international community.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194223,7 +194223,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3055, "Paragraph": "The design, implementation and timing of external support for DDR and SSR should be closely aligned with national priorities and capacities (see Boxes 6, 7 and 8). Given that activities may raise concerns over interference in areas of national sovereignty, design and approach should be carefully framed. In certain cases, \u201cdevelopment\u201d or \u201cprofessionalisation\u201d rather than \u201creform\u201d may represent more acceptable terminology. Setting out DDR\/SSR commitments in a joint letter of agreement and regularly monitoring implementation pro- vides a transparent means to set out agreed commitments between national authorities and the international community.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194241,7 +194241,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3055, "Paragraph": "The design, implementation and timing of external support for DDR and SSR should be closely aligned with national priorities and capacities (see Boxes 6, 7 and 8). Given that activities may raise concerns over interference in areas of national sovereignty, design and approach should be carefully framed. In certain cases, \u201cdevelopment\u201d or \u201cprofessionalisation\u201d rather than \u201creform\u201d may represent more acceptable terminology. Setting out DDR\/SSR commitments in a joint letter of agreement and regularly monitoring implementation pro- vides a transparent means to set out agreed commitments between national authorities and the international community.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194257,9 +194257,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3056, - "Paragraph": "Box 8 Supporting national ownership and capacities \\n Jointly establish capacity-development strategies with national authorities (see IDDRS 3.30 on National Institutions for DDR) that support common DDR and SSR objectives. \\n Support training to develop cross-cutting skills that will be useful in the long term (human resources, financial management, building gender capacity). \\n Identify and empower national reform \u2018champions\u2019 that can support DDR\/SSR. This should be developed through actor mapping during the needs assessment phase. \\n Support the capacity of oversight and coordination bodies to lead and harmonise DDR and SSR activities. Identify gaps in the national legal framework to support oversight and accountability. \\n Consider twinning international experts with national counterparts within security institutions to support skills transfer. \\n Evaluate the potential role of national committees as a mechanism to establish permanent bodies to coordinate DDR\/SSR. \\n Set down commitments in a joint letter of agreement that includes provision for regular evaluation of implementation.", + "Paragraph": "Box 8 Supporting national ownership and capacities \n Jointly establish capacity-development strategies with national authorities (see IDDRS 3.30 on National Institutions for DDR) that support common DDR and SSR objectives. \n Support training to develop cross-cutting skills that will be useful in the long term (human resources, financial management, building gender capacity). \n Identify and empower national reform \u2018champions\u2019 that can support DDR\/SSR. This should be developed through actor mapping during the needs assessment phase. \n Support the capacity of oversight and coordination bodies to lead and harmonise DDR and SSR activities. Identify gaps in the national legal framework to support oversight and accountability. \n Consider twinning international experts with national counterparts within security institutions to support skills transfer. \n Evaluate the potential role of national committees as a mechanism to establish permanent bodies to coordinate DDR\/SSR. \n Set down commitments in a joint letter of agreement that includes provision for regular evaluation of implementation.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194268,16 +194268,16 @@ "Heading2": "10.1. National ownership", "Heading3": "10.1.3. Sustainability", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Box 8 Supporting national ownership and capacities \\n Jointly establish capacity-development strategies with national authorities (see IDDRS 3.30 on National Institutions for DDR) that support common DDR and SSR objectives.", + "Sentence": "Box 8 Supporting national ownership and capacities \n Jointly establish capacity-development strategies with national authorities (see IDDRS 3.30 on National Institutions for DDR) that support common DDR and SSR objectives.", "newParagraph": "box 8 supporting national ownership capacity n jointly establish capacitydevelopment strategy national authority see iddrs 330 national institution ddr support common ddr ssr objective n support training develop crosscutting skill useful long term human resource financial management building gender capacity n identify empower national reform champion support ddrssr developed actor mapping need assessment phase n support capacity oversight coordination body lead harmonise ddr ssr activity identify gap national legal framework support oversight accountability n consider twinning international expert national counterpart within security institution support skill transfer n evaluate potential role national committee mechanism establish permanent body coordinate ddrssr n set commitment joint letter agreement includes provision regular evaluation implementation", "ProcessedSent": "box 8 supporting national ownership capacity n jointly establish capacitydevelopment strategy national authority see iddrs 330 national institution ddr support common ddr ssr objective", "SentID": 10792 }, { "ParagraphID": 3056, - "Paragraph": "Box 8 Supporting national ownership and capacities \\n Jointly establish capacity-development strategies with national authorities (see IDDRS 3.30 on National Institutions for DDR) that support common DDR and SSR objectives. \\n Support training to develop cross-cutting skills that will be useful in the long term (human resources, financial management, building gender capacity). \\n Identify and empower national reform \u2018champions\u2019 that can support DDR\/SSR. This should be developed through actor mapping during the needs assessment phase. \\n Support the capacity of oversight and coordination bodies to lead and harmonise DDR and SSR activities. Identify gaps in the national legal framework to support oversight and accountability. \\n Consider twinning international experts with national counterparts within security institutions to support skills transfer. \\n Evaluate the potential role of national committees as a mechanism to establish permanent bodies to coordinate DDR\/SSR. \\n Set down commitments in a joint letter of agreement that includes provision for regular evaluation of implementation.", + "Paragraph": "Box 8 Supporting national ownership and capacities \n Jointly establish capacity-development strategies with national authorities (see IDDRS 3.30 on National Institutions for DDR) that support common DDR and SSR objectives. \n Support training to develop cross-cutting skills that will be useful in the long term (human resources, financial management, building gender capacity). \n Identify and empower national reform \u2018champions\u2019 that can support DDR\/SSR. This should be developed through actor mapping during the needs assessment phase. \n Support the capacity of oversight and coordination bodies to lead and harmonise DDR and SSR activities. Identify gaps in the national legal framework to support oversight and accountability. \n Consider twinning international experts with national counterparts within security institutions to support skills transfer. \n Evaluate the potential role of national committees as a mechanism to establish permanent bodies to coordinate DDR\/SSR. \n Set down commitments in a joint letter of agreement that includes provision for regular evaluation of implementation.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194286,16 +194286,16 @@ "Heading2": "10.1. National ownership", "Heading3": "10.1.3. Sustainability", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Support training to develop cross-cutting skills that will be useful in the long term (human resources, financial management, building gender capacity).", + "Sentence": "\n Support training to develop cross-cutting skills that will be useful in the long term (human resources, financial management, building gender capacity).", "newParagraph": "box 8 supporting national ownership capacity n jointly establish capacitydevelopment strategy national authority see iddrs 330 national institution ddr support common ddr ssr objective n support training develop crosscutting skill useful long term human resource financial management building gender capacity n identify empower national reform champion support ddrssr developed actor mapping need assessment phase n support capacity oversight coordination body lead harmonise ddr ssr activity identify gap national legal framework support oversight accountability n consider twinning international expert national counterpart within security institution support skill transfer n evaluate potential role national committee mechanism establish permanent body coordinate ddrssr n set commitment joint letter agreement includes provision regular evaluation implementation", "ProcessedSent": "n support training develop crosscutting skill useful long term human resource financial management building gender capacity", "SentID": 10793 }, { "ParagraphID": 3056, - "Paragraph": "Box 8 Supporting national ownership and capacities \\n Jointly establish capacity-development strategies with national authorities (see IDDRS 3.30 on National Institutions for DDR) that support common DDR and SSR objectives. \\n Support training to develop cross-cutting skills that will be useful in the long term (human resources, financial management, building gender capacity). \\n Identify and empower national reform \u2018champions\u2019 that can support DDR\/SSR. This should be developed through actor mapping during the needs assessment phase. \\n Support the capacity of oversight and coordination bodies to lead and harmonise DDR and SSR activities. Identify gaps in the national legal framework to support oversight and accountability. \\n Consider twinning international experts with national counterparts within security institutions to support skills transfer. \\n Evaluate the potential role of national committees as a mechanism to establish permanent bodies to coordinate DDR\/SSR. \\n Set down commitments in a joint letter of agreement that includes provision for regular evaluation of implementation.", + "Paragraph": "Box 8 Supporting national ownership and capacities \n Jointly establish capacity-development strategies with national authorities (see IDDRS 3.30 on National Institutions for DDR) that support common DDR and SSR objectives. \n Support training to develop cross-cutting skills that will be useful in the long term (human resources, financial management, building gender capacity). \n Identify and empower national reform \u2018champions\u2019 that can support DDR\/SSR. This should be developed through actor mapping during the needs assessment phase. \n Support the capacity of oversight and coordination bodies to lead and harmonise DDR and SSR activities. Identify gaps in the national legal framework to support oversight and accountability. \n Consider twinning international experts with national counterparts within security institutions to support skills transfer. \n Evaluate the potential role of national committees as a mechanism to establish permanent bodies to coordinate DDR\/SSR. \n Set down commitments in a joint letter of agreement that includes provision for regular evaluation of implementation.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194304,16 +194304,16 @@ "Heading2": "10.1. National ownership", "Heading3": "10.1.3. Sustainability", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Identify and empower national reform \u2018champions\u2019 that can support DDR\/SSR.", + "Sentence": "\n Identify and empower national reform \u2018champions\u2019 that can support DDR\/SSR.", "newParagraph": "box 8 supporting national ownership capacity n jointly establish capacitydevelopment strategy national authority see iddrs 330 national institution ddr support common ddr ssr objective n support training develop crosscutting skill useful long term human resource financial management building gender capacity n identify empower national reform champion support ddrssr developed actor mapping need assessment phase n support capacity oversight coordination body lead harmonise ddr ssr activity identify gap national legal framework support oversight accountability n consider twinning international expert national counterpart within security institution support skill transfer n evaluate potential role national committee mechanism establish permanent body coordinate ddrssr n set commitment joint letter agreement includes provision regular evaluation implementation", "ProcessedSent": "n identify empower national reform champion support ddrssr", "SentID": 10794 }, { "ParagraphID": 3056, - "Paragraph": "Box 8 Supporting national ownership and capacities \\n Jointly establish capacity-development strategies with national authorities (see IDDRS 3.30 on National Institutions for DDR) that support common DDR and SSR objectives. \\n Support training to develop cross-cutting skills that will be useful in the long term (human resources, financial management, building gender capacity). \\n Identify and empower national reform \u2018champions\u2019 that can support DDR\/SSR. This should be developed through actor mapping during the needs assessment phase. \\n Support the capacity of oversight and coordination bodies to lead and harmonise DDR and SSR activities. Identify gaps in the national legal framework to support oversight and accountability. \\n Consider twinning international experts with national counterparts within security institutions to support skills transfer. \\n Evaluate the potential role of national committees as a mechanism to establish permanent bodies to coordinate DDR\/SSR. \\n Set down commitments in a joint letter of agreement that includes provision for regular evaluation of implementation.", + "Paragraph": "Box 8 Supporting national ownership and capacities \n Jointly establish capacity-development strategies with national authorities (see IDDRS 3.30 on National Institutions for DDR) that support common DDR and SSR objectives. \n Support training to develop cross-cutting skills that will be useful in the long term (human resources, financial management, building gender capacity). \n Identify and empower national reform \u2018champions\u2019 that can support DDR\/SSR. This should be developed through actor mapping during the needs assessment phase. \n Support the capacity of oversight and coordination bodies to lead and harmonise DDR and SSR activities. Identify gaps in the national legal framework to support oversight and accountability. \n Consider twinning international experts with national counterparts within security institutions to support skills transfer. \n Evaluate the potential role of national committees as a mechanism to establish permanent bodies to coordinate DDR\/SSR. \n Set down commitments in a joint letter of agreement that includes provision for regular evaluation of implementation.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194329,9 +194329,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3056, - "Paragraph": "Box 8 Supporting national ownership and capacities \\n Jointly establish capacity-development strategies with national authorities (see IDDRS 3.30 on National Institutions for DDR) that support common DDR and SSR objectives. \\n Support training to develop cross-cutting skills that will be useful in the long term (human resources, financial management, building gender capacity). \\n Identify and empower national reform \u2018champions\u2019 that can support DDR\/SSR. This should be developed through actor mapping during the needs assessment phase. \\n Support the capacity of oversight and coordination bodies to lead and harmonise DDR and SSR activities. Identify gaps in the national legal framework to support oversight and accountability. \\n Consider twinning international experts with national counterparts within security institutions to support skills transfer. \\n Evaluate the potential role of national committees as a mechanism to establish permanent bodies to coordinate DDR\/SSR. \\n Set down commitments in a joint letter of agreement that includes provision for regular evaluation of implementation.", + "Paragraph": "Box 8 Supporting national ownership and capacities \n Jointly establish capacity-development strategies with national authorities (see IDDRS 3.30 on National Institutions for DDR) that support common DDR and SSR objectives. \n Support training to develop cross-cutting skills that will be useful in the long term (human resources, financial management, building gender capacity). \n Identify and empower national reform \u2018champions\u2019 that can support DDR\/SSR. This should be developed through actor mapping during the needs assessment phase. \n Support the capacity of oversight and coordination bodies to lead and harmonise DDR and SSR activities. Identify gaps in the national legal framework to support oversight and accountability. \n Consider twinning international experts with national counterparts within security institutions to support skills transfer. \n Evaluate the potential role of national committees as a mechanism to establish permanent bodies to coordinate DDR\/SSR. \n Set down commitments in a joint letter of agreement that includes provision for regular evaluation of implementation.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194340,16 +194340,16 @@ "Heading2": "10.1. National ownership", "Heading3": "10.1.3. Sustainability", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Support the capacity of oversight and coordination bodies to lead and harmonise DDR and SSR activities.", + "Sentence": "\n Support the capacity of oversight and coordination bodies to lead and harmonise DDR and SSR activities.", "newParagraph": "box 8 supporting national ownership capacity n jointly establish capacitydevelopment strategy national authority see iddrs 330 national institution ddr support common ddr ssr objective n support training develop crosscutting skill useful long term human resource financial management building gender capacity n identify empower national reform champion support ddrssr developed actor mapping need assessment phase n support capacity oversight coordination body lead harmonise ddr ssr activity identify gap national legal framework support oversight accountability n consider twinning international expert national counterpart within security institution support skill transfer n evaluate potential role national committee mechanism establish permanent body coordinate ddrssr n set commitment joint letter agreement includes provision regular evaluation implementation", "ProcessedSent": "n support capacity oversight coordination body lead harmonise ddr ssr activity", "SentID": 10796 }, { "ParagraphID": 3056, - "Paragraph": "Box 8 Supporting national ownership and capacities \\n Jointly establish capacity-development strategies with national authorities (see IDDRS 3.30 on National Institutions for DDR) that support common DDR and SSR objectives. \\n Support training to develop cross-cutting skills that will be useful in the long term (human resources, financial management, building gender capacity). \\n Identify and empower national reform \u2018champions\u2019 that can support DDR\/SSR. This should be developed through actor mapping during the needs assessment phase. \\n Support the capacity of oversight and coordination bodies to lead and harmonise DDR and SSR activities. Identify gaps in the national legal framework to support oversight and accountability. \\n Consider twinning international experts with national counterparts within security institutions to support skills transfer. \\n Evaluate the potential role of national committees as a mechanism to establish permanent bodies to coordinate DDR\/SSR. \\n Set down commitments in a joint letter of agreement that includes provision for regular evaluation of implementation.", + "Paragraph": "Box 8 Supporting national ownership and capacities \n Jointly establish capacity-development strategies with national authorities (see IDDRS 3.30 on National Institutions for DDR) that support common DDR and SSR objectives. \n Support training to develop cross-cutting skills that will be useful in the long term (human resources, financial management, building gender capacity). \n Identify and empower national reform \u2018champions\u2019 that can support DDR\/SSR. This should be developed through actor mapping during the needs assessment phase. \n Support the capacity of oversight and coordination bodies to lead and harmonise DDR and SSR activities. Identify gaps in the national legal framework to support oversight and accountability. \n Consider twinning international experts with national counterparts within security institutions to support skills transfer. \n Evaluate the potential role of national committees as a mechanism to establish permanent bodies to coordinate DDR\/SSR. \n Set down commitments in a joint letter of agreement that includes provision for regular evaluation of implementation.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194365,9 +194365,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3056, - "Paragraph": "Box 8 Supporting national ownership and capacities \\n Jointly establish capacity-development strategies with national authorities (see IDDRS 3.30 on National Institutions for DDR) that support common DDR and SSR objectives. \\n Support training to develop cross-cutting skills that will be useful in the long term (human resources, financial management, building gender capacity). \\n Identify and empower national reform \u2018champions\u2019 that can support DDR\/SSR. This should be developed through actor mapping during the needs assessment phase. \\n Support the capacity of oversight and coordination bodies to lead and harmonise DDR and SSR activities. Identify gaps in the national legal framework to support oversight and accountability. \\n Consider twinning international experts with national counterparts within security institutions to support skills transfer. \\n Evaluate the potential role of national committees as a mechanism to establish permanent bodies to coordinate DDR\/SSR. \\n Set down commitments in a joint letter of agreement that includes provision for regular evaluation of implementation.", + "Paragraph": "Box 8 Supporting national ownership and capacities \n Jointly establish capacity-development strategies with national authorities (see IDDRS 3.30 on National Institutions for DDR) that support common DDR and SSR objectives. \n Support training to develop cross-cutting skills that will be useful in the long term (human resources, financial management, building gender capacity). \n Identify and empower national reform \u2018champions\u2019 that can support DDR\/SSR. This should be developed through actor mapping during the needs assessment phase. \n Support the capacity of oversight and coordination bodies to lead and harmonise DDR and SSR activities. Identify gaps in the national legal framework to support oversight and accountability. \n Consider twinning international experts with national counterparts within security institutions to support skills transfer. \n Evaluate the potential role of national committees as a mechanism to establish permanent bodies to coordinate DDR\/SSR. \n Set down commitments in a joint letter of agreement that includes provision for regular evaluation of implementation.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194376,16 +194376,16 @@ "Heading2": "10.1. National ownership", "Heading3": "10.1.3. Sustainability", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Consider twinning international experts with national counterparts within security institutions to support skills transfer.", + "Sentence": "\n Consider twinning international experts with national counterparts within security institutions to support skills transfer.", "newParagraph": "box 8 supporting national ownership capacity n jointly establish capacitydevelopment strategy national authority see iddrs 330 national institution ddr support common ddr ssr objective n support training develop crosscutting skill useful long term human resource financial management building gender capacity n identify empower national reform champion support ddrssr developed actor mapping need assessment phase n support capacity oversight coordination body lead harmonise ddr ssr activity identify gap national legal framework support oversight accountability n consider twinning international expert national counterpart within security institution support skill transfer n evaluate potential role national committee mechanism establish permanent body coordinate ddrssr n set commitment joint letter agreement includes provision regular evaluation implementation", "ProcessedSent": "n consider twinning international expert national counterpart within security institution support skill transfer", "SentID": 10798 }, { "ParagraphID": 3056, - "Paragraph": "Box 8 Supporting national ownership and capacities \\n Jointly establish capacity-development strategies with national authorities (see IDDRS 3.30 on National Institutions for DDR) that support common DDR and SSR objectives. \\n Support training to develop cross-cutting skills that will be useful in the long term (human resources, financial management, building gender capacity). \\n Identify and empower national reform \u2018champions\u2019 that can support DDR\/SSR. This should be developed through actor mapping during the needs assessment phase. \\n Support the capacity of oversight and coordination bodies to lead and harmonise DDR and SSR activities. Identify gaps in the national legal framework to support oversight and accountability. \\n Consider twinning international experts with national counterparts within security institutions to support skills transfer. \\n Evaluate the potential role of national committees as a mechanism to establish permanent bodies to coordinate DDR\/SSR. \\n Set down commitments in a joint letter of agreement that includes provision for regular evaluation of implementation.", + "Paragraph": "Box 8 Supporting national ownership and capacities \n Jointly establish capacity-development strategies with national authorities (see IDDRS 3.30 on National Institutions for DDR) that support common DDR and SSR objectives. \n Support training to develop cross-cutting skills that will be useful in the long term (human resources, financial management, building gender capacity). \n Identify and empower national reform \u2018champions\u2019 that can support DDR\/SSR. This should be developed through actor mapping during the needs assessment phase. \n Support the capacity of oversight and coordination bodies to lead and harmonise DDR and SSR activities. Identify gaps in the national legal framework to support oversight and accountability. \n Consider twinning international experts with national counterparts within security institutions to support skills transfer. \n Evaluate the potential role of national committees as a mechanism to establish permanent bodies to coordinate DDR\/SSR. \n Set down commitments in a joint letter of agreement that includes provision for regular evaluation of implementation.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194394,16 +194394,16 @@ "Heading2": "10.1. National ownership", "Heading3": "10.1.3. Sustainability", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Evaluate the potential role of national committees as a mechanism to establish permanent bodies to coordinate DDR\/SSR.", + "Sentence": "\n Evaluate the potential role of national committees as a mechanism to establish permanent bodies to coordinate DDR\/SSR.", "newParagraph": "box 8 supporting national ownership capacity n jointly establish capacitydevelopment strategy national authority see iddrs 330 national institution ddr support common ddr ssr objective n support training develop crosscutting skill useful long term human resource financial management building gender capacity n identify empower national reform champion support ddrssr developed actor mapping need assessment phase n support capacity oversight coordination body lead harmonise ddr ssr activity identify gap national legal framework support oversight accountability n consider twinning international expert national counterpart within security institution support skill transfer n evaluate potential role national committee mechanism establish permanent body coordinate ddrssr n set commitment joint letter agreement includes provision regular evaluation implementation", "ProcessedSent": "n evaluate potential role national committee mechanism establish permanent body coordinate ddrssr", "SentID": 10799 }, { "ParagraphID": 3056, - "Paragraph": "Box 8 Supporting national ownership and capacities \\n Jointly establish capacity-development strategies with national authorities (see IDDRS 3.30 on National Institutions for DDR) that support common DDR and SSR objectives. \\n Support training to develop cross-cutting skills that will be useful in the long term (human resources, financial management, building gender capacity). \\n Identify and empower national reform \u2018champions\u2019 that can support DDR\/SSR. This should be developed through actor mapping during the needs assessment phase. \\n Support the capacity of oversight and coordination bodies to lead and harmonise DDR and SSR activities. Identify gaps in the national legal framework to support oversight and accountability. \\n Consider twinning international experts with national counterparts within security institutions to support skills transfer. \\n Evaluate the potential role of national committees as a mechanism to establish permanent bodies to coordinate DDR\/SSR. \\n Set down commitments in a joint letter of agreement that includes provision for regular evaluation of implementation.", + "Paragraph": "Box 8 Supporting national ownership and capacities \n Jointly establish capacity-development strategies with national authorities (see IDDRS 3.30 on National Institutions for DDR) that support common DDR and SSR objectives. \n Support training to develop cross-cutting skills that will be useful in the long term (human resources, financial management, building gender capacity). \n Identify and empower national reform \u2018champions\u2019 that can support DDR\/SSR. This should be developed through actor mapping during the needs assessment phase. \n Support the capacity of oversight and coordination bodies to lead and harmonise DDR and SSR activities. Identify gaps in the national legal framework to support oversight and accountability. \n Consider twinning international experts with national counterparts within security institutions to support skills transfer. \n Evaluate the potential role of national committees as a mechanism to establish permanent bodies to coordinate DDR\/SSR. \n Set down commitments in a joint letter of agreement that includes provision for regular evaluation of implementation.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194412,7 +194412,7 @@ "Heading2": "10.1. National ownership", "Heading3": "10.1.3. Sustainability", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Set down commitments in a joint letter of agreement that includes provision for regular evaluation of implementation.", + "Sentence": "\n Set down commitments in a joint letter of agreement that includes provision for regular evaluation of implementation.", "newParagraph": "box 8 supporting national ownership capacity n jointly establish capacitydevelopment strategy national authority see iddrs 330 national institution ddr support common ddr ssr objective n support training develop crosscutting skill useful long term human resource financial management building gender capacity n identify empower national reform champion support ddrssr developed actor mapping need assessment phase n support capacity oversight coordination body lead harmonise ddr ssr activity identify gap national legal framework support oversight accountability n consider twinning international expert national counterpart within security institution support skill transfer n evaluate potential role national committee mechanism establish permanent body coordinate ddrssr n set commitment joint letter agreement includes provision regular evaluation implementation", "ProcessedSent": "n set commitment joint letter agreement includes provision regular evaluation implementation", "SentID": 10800 @@ -194421,7 +194421,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3057, "Paragraph": "A common challenge for DDR and SSR programmes is to develop approaches where exter- nal assistance supports national actors in defining and implementing their own security needs and objectives. While operationalising national ownership remains a major challenge for the international community, this can be mitigated through effective coordination, en- hanced capacities and targeted funding.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194439,7 +194439,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3057, "Paragraph": "A common challenge for DDR and SSR programmes is to develop approaches where exter- nal assistance supports national actors in defining and implementing their own security needs and objectives. While operationalising national ownership remains a major challenge for the international community, this can be mitigated through effective coordination, en- hanced capacities and targeted funding.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194457,7 +194457,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3058, "Paragraph": "Improved coordination can support more coherent policy making and programming that takes into account the nexus between DDR and SSR. By contrast, parallel or contradictory approaches risk undermining common objectives to support national DDR and SSR proc- esses. While DDR is characterised by a strong UN role, SSR activities (and funding) are predominantly supported by bilateral donors through specific arrangements with national authorities. In some cases there may be a mixed approach, for example, with bilateral partners supporting army reform, whereas UN Police is advising on rebuilding the police sector. Promoting \u2018joint\u2019 assessments and develop- ing in-country coordination mechanisms can provide a clearer basis for developing co- herent international support in these areas.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194475,7 +194475,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3058, "Paragraph": "Improved coordination can support more coherent policy making and programming that takes into account the nexus between DDR and SSR. By contrast, parallel or contradictory approaches risk undermining common objectives to support national DDR and SSR proc- esses. While DDR is characterised by a strong UN role, SSR activities (and funding) are predominantly supported by bilateral donors through specific arrangements with national authorities. In some cases there may be a mixed approach, for example, with bilateral partners supporting army reform, whereas UN Police is advising on rebuilding the police sector. Promoting \u2018joint\u2019 assessments and develop- ing in-country coordination mechanisms can provide a clearer basis for developing co- herent international support in these areas.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194493,7 +194493,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3058, "Paragraph": "Improved coordination can support more coherent policy making and programming that takes into account the nexus between DDR and SSR. By contrast, parallel or contradictory approaches risk undermining common objectives to support national DDR and SSR proc- esses. While DDR is characterised by a strong UN role, SSR activities (and funding) are predominantly supported by bilateral donors through specific arrangements with national authorities. In some cases there may be a mixed approach, for example, with bilateral partners supporting army reform, whereas UN Police is advising on rebuilding the police sector. Promoting \u2018joint\u2019 assessments and develop- ing in-country coordination mechanisms can provide a clearer basis for developing co- herent international support in these areas.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194511,7 +194511,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3058, "Paragraph": "Improved coordination can support more coherent policy making and programming that takes into account the nexus between DDR and SSR. By contrast, parallel or contradictory approaches risk undermining common objectives to support national DDR and SSR proc- esses. While DDR is characterised by a strong UN role, SSR activities (and funding) are predominantly supported by bilateral donors through specific arrangements with national authorities. In some cases there may be a mixed approach, for example, with bilateral partners supporting army reform, whereas UN Police is advising on rebuilding the police sector. Promoting \u2018joint\u2019 assessments and develop- ing in-country coordination mechanisms can provide a clearer basis for developing co- herent international support in these areas.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194529,7 +194529,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3058, "Paragraph": "Improved coordination can support more coherent policy making and programming that takes into account the nexus between DDR and SSR. By contrast, parallel or contradictory approaches risk undermining common objectives to support national DDR and SSR proc- esses. While DDR is characterised by a strong UN role, SSR activities (and funding) are predominantly supported by bilateral donors through specific arrangements with national authorities. In some cases there may be a mixed approach, for example, with bilateral partners supporting army reform, whereas UN Police is advising on rebuilding the police sector. Promoting \u2018joint\u2019 assessments and develop- ing in-country coordination mechanisms can provide a clearer basis for developing co- herent international support in these areas.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194547,7 +194547,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3059, "Paragraph": "In practice, limited overlap between ac- tors engaged in DDR and SSR indicates a need to establish more effective coordination mechanisms. The UN may in many cases provide a coordinating role for international support in a given context. Mapping the var- ious actors involved in DDR and SSR and their activities provides a structured basis to identify gaps and build synergies across the international community (see Case Study Box 6 below). Agreeing common understandings of \u2018SSR\u2019, consistent with the UN approach and other relevant policy frameworks is an important starting point for coordination. The creation of a joint steering committee or similar coordination mechanism for DDR\/SSR may contribute to enhancing coherence throughout programme implementation. However, sufficient political will to implement \u2018joined up\u2019 approaches remains the key enabling fac- tor for improved coordination.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194565,7 +194565,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3059, "Paragraph": "In practice, limited overlap between ac- tors engaged in DDR and SSR indicates a need to establish more effective coordination mechanisms. The UN may in many cases provide a coordinating role for international support in a given context. Mapping the var- ious actors involved in DDR and SSR and their activities provides a structured basis to identify gaps and build synergies across the international community (see Case Study Box 6 below). Agreeing common understandings of \u2018SSR\u2019, consistent with the UN approach and other relevant policy frameworks is an important starting point for coordination. The creation of a joint steering committee or similar coordination mechanism for DDR\/SSR may contribute to enhancing coherence throughout programme implementation. However, sufficient political will to implement \u2018joined up\u2019 approaches remains the key enabling fac- tor for improved coordination.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194583,7 +194583,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3059, "Paragraph": "In practice, limited overlap between ac- tors engaged in DDR and SSR indicates a need to establish more effective coordination mechanisms. The UN may in many cases provide a coordinating role for international support in a given context. Mapping the var- ious actors involved in DDR and SSR and their activities provides a structured basis to identify gaps and build synergies across the international community (see Case Study Box 6 below). Agreeing common understandings of \u2018SSR\u2019, consistent with the UN approach and other relevant policy frameworks is an important starting point for coordination. The creation of a joint steering committee or similar coordination mechanism for DDR\/SSR may contribute to enhancing coherence throughout programme implementation. However, sufficient political will to implement \u2018joined up\u2019 approaches remains the key enabling fac- tor for improved coordination.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194601,7 +194601,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3059, "Paragraph": "In practice, limited overlap between ac- tors engaged in DDR and SSR indicates a need to establish more effective coordination mechanisms. The UN may in many cases provide a coordinating role for international support in a given context. Mapping the var- ious actors involved in DDR and SSR and their activities provides a structured basis to identify gaps and build synergies across the international community (see Case Study Box 6 below). Agreeing common understandings of \u2018SSR\u2019, consistent with the UN approach and other relevant policy frameworks is an important starting point for coordination. The creation of a joint steering committee or similar coordination mechanism for DDR\/SSR may contribute to enhancing coherence throughout programme implementation. However, sufficient political will to implement \u2018joined up\u2019 approaches remains the key enabling fac- tor for improved coordination.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194619,7 +194619,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3059, "Paragraph": "In practice, limited overlap between ac- tors engaged in DDR and SSR indicates a need to establish more effective coordination mechanisms. The UN may in many cases provide a coordinating role for international support in a given context. Mapping the var- ious actors involved in DDR and SSR and their activities provides a structured basis to identify gaps and build synergies across the international community (see Case Study Box 6 below). Agreeing common understandings of \u2018SSR\u2019, consistent with the UN approach and other relevant policy frameworks is an important starting point for coordination. The creation of a joint steering committee or similar coordination mechanism for DDR\/SSR may contribute to enhancing coherence throughout programme implementation. However, sufficient political will to implement \u2018joined up\u2019 approaches remains the key enabling fac- tor for improved coordination.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194637,7 +194637,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3059, "Paragraph": "In practice, limited overlap between ac- tors engaged in DDR and SSR indicates a need to establish more effective coordination mechanisms. The UN may in many cases provide a coordinating role for international support in a given context. Mapping the var- ious actors involved in DDR and SSR and their activities provides a structured basis to identify gaps and build synergies across the international community (see Case Study Box 6 below). Agreeing common understandings of \u2018SSR\u2019, consistent with the UN approach and other relevant policy frameworks is an important starting point for coordination. The creation of a joint steering committee or similar coordination mechanism for DDR\/SSR may contribute to enhancing coherence throughout programme implementation. However, sufficient political will to implement \u2018joined up\u2019 approaches remains the key enabling fac- tor for improved coordination.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194653,9 +194653,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3060, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 6 Strengthening SSR coordination in Burundi \\n In Burundi, the large number of international actors engaged in supporting SSR led to coordination challenges. In 2006, the DDR\/SSR unit of the United Nations Operation in Burundi (ONUB) recognized the need to improve coordination and identified as a first step the importance of gaining an overview of relevant actors and activities. This was done by mapping current and planned SSR support by international actors in order to minimize overlaps and identify gaps. The mapping was divided by categories of support and included applicable implementation timelines. The DDR\/SSR unit regularly distributed results to the wider international community. Several bilateral actors recognized the value of this initiative and highlighted that the DDR\/SSR unit had a comparative advantage in fulfilling this role because it had the human resources necessary to undertake such efforts.16 While coordination challenges among such a large number of actors is inevitable, ONUB\u2019s efforts has contributed to a more structured dialogue on these issues within the international community in Burundi.", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 6 Strengthening SSR coordination in Burundi \n In Burundi, the large number of international actors engaged in supporting SSR led to coordination challenges. In 2006, the DDR\/SSR unit of the United Nations Operation in Burundi (ONUB) recognized the need to improve coordination and identified as a first step the importance of gaining an overview of relevant actors and activities. This was done by mapping current and planned SSR support by international actors in order to minimize overlaps and identify gaps. The mapping was divided by categories of support and included applicable implementation timelines. The DDR\/SSR unit regularly distributed results to the wider international community. Several bilateral actors recognized the value of this initiative and highlighted that the DDR\/SSR unit had a comparative advantage in fulfilling this role because it had the human resources necessary to undertake such efforts.16 While coordination challenges among such a large number of actors is inevitable, ONUB\u2019s efforts has contributed to a more structured dialogue on these issues within the international community in Burundi.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194664,16 +194664,16 @@ "Heading2": "10.2. International support", "Heading3": "10.2.1. Coordination", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Case Study Box 6 Strengthening SSR coordination in Burundi \\n In Burundi, the large number of international actors engaged in supporting SSR led to coordination challenges.", + "Sentence": "Case Study Box 6 Strengthening SSR coordination in Burundi \n In Burundi, the large number of international actors engaged in supporting SSR led to coordination challenges.", "newParagraph": "case study box 6 strengthening ssr coordination burundi n burundi large number international actor engaged supporting ssr led coordination challenge 2006 ddrssr unit united nation operation burundi onub recognized need improve coordination identified first step importance gaining overview relevant actor activity done mapping current planned ssr support international actor order minimize overlap identify gap mapping divided category support included applicable implementation timeline ddrssr unit regularly distributed result wider international community several bilateral actor recognized value initiative highlighted ddrssr unit comparative advantage fulfilling role human resource necessary undertake efforts16 coordination challenge among large number actor inevitable onub effort contributed structured dialogue issue within international community burundi", "ProcessedSent": "case study box 6 strengthening ssr coordination burundi n burundi large number international actor engaged supporting ssr led coordination challenge", "SentID": 10814 }, { "ParagraphID": 3060, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 6 Strengthening SSR coordination in Burundi \\n In Burundi, the large number of international actors engaged in supporting SSR led to coordination challenges. In 2006, the DDR\/SSR unit of the United Nations Operation in Burundi (ONUB) recognized the need to improve coordination and identified as a first step the importance of gaining an overview of relevant actors and activities. This was done by mapping current and planned SSR support by international actors in order to minimize overlaps and identify gaps. The mapping was divided by categories of support and included applicable implementation timelines. The DDR\/SSR unit regularly distributed results to the wider international community. Several bilateral actors recognized the value of this initiative and highlighted that the DDR\/SSR unit had a comparative advantage in fulfilling this role because it had the human resources necessary to undertake such efforts.16 While coordination challenges among such a large number of actors is inevitable, ONUB\u2019s efforts has contributed to a more structured dialogue on these issues within the international community in Burundi.", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 6 Strengthening SSR coordination in Burundi \n In Burundi, the large number of international actors engaged in supporting SSR led to coordination challenges. In 2006, the DDR\/SSR unit of the United Nations Operation in Burundi (ONUB) recognized the need to improve coordination and identified as a first step the importance of gaining an overview of relevant actors and activities. This was done by mapping current and planned SSR support by international actors in order to minimize overlaps and identify gaps. The mapping was divided by categories of support and included applicable implementation timelines. The DDR\/SSR unit regularly distributed results to the wider international community. Several bilateral actors recognized the value of this initiative and highlighted that the DDR\/SSR unit had a comparative advantage in fulfilling this role because it had the human resources necessary to undertake such efforts.16 While coordination challenges among such a large number of actors is inevitable, ONUB\u2019s efforts has contributed to a more structured dialogue on these issues within the international community in Burundi.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194689,9 +194689,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3060, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 6 Strengthening SSR coordination in Burundi \\n In Burundi, the large number of international actors engaged in supporting SSR led to coordination challenges. In 2006, the DDR\/SSR unit of the United Nations Operation in Burundi (ONUB) recognized the need to improve coordination and identified as a first step the importance of gaining an overview of relevant actors and activities. This was done by mapping current and planned SSR support by international actors in order to minimize overlaps and identify gaps. The mapping was divided by categories of support and included applicable implementation timelines. The DDR\/SSR unit regularly distributed results to the wider international community. Several bilateral actors recognized the value of this initiative and highlighted that the DDR\/SSR unit had a comparative advantage in fulfilling this role because it had the human resources necessary to undertake such efforts.16 While coordination challenges among such a large number of actors is inevitable, ONUB\u2019s efforts has contributed to a more structured dialogue on these issues within the international community in Burundi.", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 6 Strengthening SSR coordination in Burundi \n In Burundi, the large number of international actors engaged in supporting SSR led to coordination challenges. In 2006, the DDR\/SSR unit of the United Nations Operation in Burundi (ONUB) recognized the need to improve coordination and identified as a first step the importance of gaining an overview of relevant actors and activities. This was done by mapping current and planned SSR support by international actors in order to minimize overlaps and identify gaps. The mapping was divided by categories of support and included applicable implementation timelines. The DDR\/SSR unit regularly distributed results to the wider international community. Several bilateral actors recognized the value of this initiative and highlighted that the DDR\/SSR unit had a comparative advantage in fulfilling this role because it had the human resources necessary to undertake such efforts.16 While coordination challenges among such a large number of actors is inevitable, ONUB\u2019s efforts has contributed to a more structured dialogue on these issues within the international community in Burundi.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194707,9 +194707,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3060, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 6 Strengthening SSR coordination in Burundi \\n In Burundi, the large number of international actors engaged in supporting SSR led to coordination challenges. In 2006, the DDR\/SSR unit of the United Nations Operation in Burundi (ONUB) recognized the need to improve coordination and identified as a first step the importance of gaining an overview of relevant actors and activities. This was done by mapping current and planned SSR support by international actors in order to minimize overlaps and identify gaps. The mapping was divided by categories of support and included applicable implementation timelines. The DDR\/SSR unit regularly distributed results to the wider international community. Several bilateral actors recognized the value of this initiative and highlighted that the DDR\/SSR unit had a comparative advantage in fulfilling this role because it had the human resources necessary to undertake such efforts.16 While coordination challenges among such a large number of actors is inevitable, ONUB\u2019s efforts has contributed to a more structured dialogue on these issues within the international community in Burundi.", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 6 Strengthening SSR coordination in Burundi \n In Burundi, the large number of international actors engaged in supporting SSR led to coordination challenges. In 2006, the DDR\/SSR unit of the United Nations Operation in Burundi (ONUB) recognized the need to improve coordination and identified as a first step the importance of gaining an overview of relevant actors and activities. This was done by mapping current and planned SSR support by international actors in order to minimize overlaps and identify gaps. The mapping was divided by categories of support and included applicable implementation timelines. The DDR\/SSR unit regularly distributed results to the wider international community. Several bilateral actors recognized the value of this initiative and highlighted that the DDR\/SSR unit had a comparative advantage in fulfilling this role because it had the human resources necessary to undertake such efforts.16 While coordination challenges among such a large number of actors is inevitable, ONUB\u2019s efforts has contributed to a more structured dialogue on these issues within the international community in Burundi.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194725,9 +194725,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3060, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 6 Strengthening SSR coordination in Burundi \\n In Burundi, the large number of international actors engaged in supporting SSR led to coordination challenges. In 2006, the DDR\/SSR unit of the United Nations Operation in Burundi (ONUB) recognized the need to improve coordination and identified as a first step the importance of gaining an overview of relevant actors and activities. This was done by mapping current and planned SSR support by international actors in order to minimize overlaps and identify gaps. The mapping was divided by categories of support and included applicable implementation timelines. The DDR\/SSR unit regularly distributed results to the wider international community. Several bilateral actors recognized the value of this initiative and highlighted that the DDR\/SSR unit had a comparative advantage in fulfilling this role because it had the human resources necessary to undertake such efforts.16 While coordination challenges among such a large number of actors is inevitable, ONUB\u2019s efforts has contributed to a more structured dialogue on these issues within the international community in Burundi.", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 6 Strengthening SSR coordination in Burundi \n In Burundi, the large number of international actors engaged in supporting SSR led to coordination challenges. In 2006, the DDR\/SSR unit of the United Nations Operation in Burundi (ONUB) recognized the need to improve coordination and identified as a first step the importance of gaining an overview of relevant actors and activities. This was done by mapping current and planned SSR support by international actors in order to minimize overlaps and identify gaps. The mapping was divided by categories of support and included applicable implementation timelines. The DDR\/SSR unit regularly distributed results to the wider international community. Several bilateral actors recognized the value of this initiative and highlighted that the DDR\/SSR unit had a comparative advantage in fulfilling this role because it had the human resources necessary to undertake such efforts.16 While coordination challenges among such a large number of actors is inevitable, ONUB\u2019s efforts has contributed to a more structured dialogue on these issues within the international community in Burundi.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194743,9 +194743,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3060, - "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 6 Strengthening SSR coordination in Burundi \\n In Burundi, the large number of international actors engaged in supporting SSR led to coordination challenges. In 2006, the DDR\/SSR unit of the United Nations Operation in Burundi (ONUB) recognized the need to improve coordination and identified as a first step the importance of gaining an overview of relevant actors and activities. This was done by mapping current and planned SSR support by international actors in order to minimize overlaps and identify gaps. The mapping was divided by categories of support and included applicable implementation timelines. The DDR\/SSR unit regularly distributed results to the wider international community. Several bilateral actors recognized the value of this initiative and highlighted that the DDR\/SSR unit had a comparative advantage in fulfilling this role because it had the human resources necessary to undertake such efforts.16 While coordination challenges among such a large number of actors is inevitable, ONUB\u2019s efforts has contributed to a more structured dialogue on these issues within the international community in Burundi.", + "Paragraph": "Case Study Box 6 Strengthening SSR coordination in Burundi \n In Burundi, the large number of international actors engaged in supporting SSR led to coordination challenges. In 2006, the DDR\/SSR unit of the United Nations Operation in Burundi (ONUB) recognized the need to improve coordination and identified as a first step the importance of gaining an overview of relevant actors and activities. This was done by mapping current and planned SSR support by international actors in order to minimize overlaps and identify gaps. The mapping was divided by categories of support and included applicable implementation timelines. The DDR\/SSR unit regularly distributed results to the wider international community. Several bilateral actors recognized the value of this initiative and highlighted that the DDR\/SSR unit had a comparative advantage in fulfilling this role because it had the human resources necessary to undertake such efforts.16 While coordination challenges among such a large number of actors is inevitable, ONUB\u2019s efforts has contributed to a more structured dialogue on these issues within the international community in Burundi.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194763,7 +194763,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3061, "Paragraph": "Support to DDR\/SSR processes requires the deployment of a range of different capacities.17 Awareness of the potential synergies that may be realised through a coherent approach to these activities is equally important. Appropriate training offers a means to develop such awareness while including the need to consider the relationship between DDR and SSR in the terms of reference (ToRs) of staff members provides a practical means to embed this issue within programmes.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194781,7 +194781,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3061, "Paragraph": "Support to DDR\/SSR processes requires the deployment of a range of different capacities.17 Awareness of the potential synergies that may be realised through a coherent approach to these activities is equally important. Appropriate training offers a means to develop such awareness while including the need to consider the relationship between DDR and SSR in the terms of reference (ToRs) of staff members provides a practical means to embed this issue within programmes.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194799,7 +194799,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3062, "Paragraph": "Cross-participation by DDR and SSR experts in tailored training programmes that ad- dress the DDR\/SSR nexus should be developed to support knowledge transfer and foster common understandings. Where appropriate, coordination with SSR counterparts (and vice versa) should be included in the ToRs of relevant headquarters and field-based personnel. Linking the provision of DDR\/SSR capacities to a shared vision of DDR\/SSR objectives in a given context and an understanding of comparative advantages in different aspects of DDR\/ SSR should be an important component of joint coordination and planning (see 10.2.1.).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194817,7 +194817,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3062, "Paragraph": "Cross-participation by DDR and SSR experts in tailored training programmes that ad- dress the DDR\/SSR nexus should be developed to support knowledge transfer and foster common understandings. Where appropriate, coordination with SSR counterparts (and vice versa) should be included in the ToRs of relevant headquarters and field-based personnel. Linking the provision of DDR\/SSR capacities to a shared vision of DDR\/SSR objectives in a given context and an understanding of comparative advantages in different aspects of DDR\/ SSR should be an important component of joint coordination and planning (see 10.2.1.).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194835,7 +194835,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3062, "Paragraph": "Cross-participation by DDR and SSR experts in tailored training programmes that ad- dress the DDR\/SSR nexus should be developed to support knowledge transfer and foster common understandings. Where appropriate, coordination with SSR counterparts (and vice versa) should be included in the ToRs of relevant headquarters and field-based personnel. Linking the provision of DDR\/SSR capacities to a shared vision of DDR\/SSR objectives in a given context and an understanding of comparative advantages in different aspects of DDR\/ SSR should be an important component of joint coordination and planning (see 10.2.1.).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194853,7 +194853,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3062, "Paragraph": "Cross-participation by DDR and SSR experts in tailored training programmes that ad- dress the DDR\/SSR nexus should be developed to support knowledge transfer and foster common understandings. Where appropriate, coordination with SSR counterparts (and vice versa) should be included in the ToRs of relevant headquarters and field-based personnel. Linking the provision of DDR\/SSR capacities to a shared vision of DDR\/SSR objectives in a given context and an understanding of comparative advantages in different aspects of DDR\/ SSR should be an important component of joint coordination and planning (see 10.2.1.).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194871,7 +194871,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3063, "Paragraph": "Recognizing that the success of DDR may be linked to progress in SSR, or vice versa, re- quires sensitivity to the need to invest simultaneously in related programmes. Implementation of DDR and SSR programmes is frequently hampered by the non-availability or slow disburse- ment of funds. Delays in one area due to lack of funding can mean that funds earmarked for other key activities can also be blocked. If ex-combatants are forced to wait to enter the DDR process because of funding delays, this may result in heightened tensions or participants abandoning the process.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194889,7 +194889,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3063, "Paragraph": "Recognizing that the success of DDR may be linked to progress in SSR, or vice versa, re- quires sensitivity to the need to invest simultaneously in related programmes. Implementation of DDR and SSR programmes is frequently hampered by the non-availability or slow disburse- ment of funds. Delays in one area due to lack of funding can mean that funds earmarked for other key activities can also be blocked. If ex-combatants are forced to wait to enter the DDR process because of funding delays, this may result in heightened tensions or participants abandoning the process.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194907,7 +194907,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3063, "Paragraph": "Recognizing that the success of DDR may be linked to progress in SSR, or vice versa, re- quires sensitivity to the need to invest simultaneously in related programmes. Implementation of DDR and SSR programmes is frequently hampered by the non-availability or slow disburse- ment of funds. Delays in one area due to lack of funding can mean that funds earmarked for other key activities can also be blocked. If ex-combatants are forced to wait to enter the DDR process because of funding delays, this may result in heightened tensions or participants abandoning the process.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194925,7 +194925,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3063, "Paragraph": "Recognizing that the success of DDR may be linked to progress in SSR, or vice versa, re- quires sensitivity to the need to invest simultaneously in related programmes. Implementation of DDR and SSR programmes is frequently hampered by the non-availability or slow disburse- ment of funds. Delays in one area due to lack of funding can mean that funds earmarked for other key activities can also be blocked. If ex-combatants are forced to wait to enter the DDR process because of funding delays, this may result in heightened tensions or participants abandoning the process.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194943,7 +194943,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3064, "Paragraph": "Given the context specific ways that DDR and SSR can influence each other, there is no ideal model for integrated DDR-SSR funding. Increased use of multi-donor trust funds that address both issues represents one potential means to more effectively integrate DDR and SSR through pooled funding. National ownership is a key consideration: funding support for DDR\/SSR should reflect the absorptive capacity of the state, including national resource limitations. In particular, the levels of ex-combatants integrated within the reformed security sector should be sus- tainable through national budgets. Supporting measures to enhance management and oversight of security budgeting provide an important means to support the effective use of limited resources for DDR and SSR. Improved transparency and accountability also contributes to building trust at the national level and between national authorities and international partners.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194961,7 +194961,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3064, "Paragraph": "Given the context specific ways that DDR and SSR can influence each other, there is no ideal model for integrated DDR-SSR funding. Increased use of multi-donor trust funds that address both issues represents one potential means to more effectively integrate DDR and SSR through pooled funding. National ownership is a key consideration: funding support for DDR\/SSR should reflect the absorptive capacity of the state, including national resource limitations. In particular, the levels of ex-combatants integrated within the reformed security sector should be sus- tainable through national budgets. Supporting measures to enhance management and oversight of security budgeting provide an important means to support the effective use of limited resources for DDR and SSR. Improved transparency and accountability also contributes to building trust at the national level and between national authorities and international partners.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194979,7 +194979,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3064, "Paragraph": "Given the context specific ways that DDR and SSR can influence each other, there is no ideal model for integrated DDR-SSR funding. Increased use of multi-donor trust funds that address both issues represents one potential means to more effectively integrate DDR and SSR through pooled funding. National ownership is a key consideration: funding support for DDR\/SSR should reflect the absorptive capacity of the state, including national resource limitations. In particular, the levels of ex-combatants integrated within the reformed security sector should be sus- tainable through national budgets. Supporting measures to enhance management and oversight of security budgeting provide an important means to support the effective use of limited resources for DDR and SSR. Improved transparency and accountability also contributes to building trust at the national level and between national authorities and international partners.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -194997,7 +194997,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3064, "Paragraph": "Given the context specific ways that DDR and SSR can influence each other, there is no ideal model for integrated DDR-SSR funding. Increased use of multi-donor trust funds that address both issues represents one potential means to more effectively integrate DDR and SSR through pooled funding. National ownership is a key consideration: funding support for DDR\/SSR should reflect the absorptive capacity of the state, including national resource limitations. In particular, the levels of ex-combatants integrated within the reformed security sector should be sus- tainable through national budgets. Supporting measures to enhance management and oversight of security budgeting provide an important means to support the effective use of limited resources for DDR and SSR. Improved transparency and accountability also contributes to building trust at the national level and between national authorities and international partners.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195015,7 +195015,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3064, "Paragraph": "Given the context specific ways that DDR and SSR can influence each other, there is no ideal model for integrated DDR-SSR funding. Increased use of multi-donor trust funds that address both issues represents one potential means to more effectively integrate DDR and SSR through pooled funding. National ownership is a key consideration: funding support for DDR\/SSR should reflect the absorptive capacity of the state, including national resource limitations. In particular, the levels of ex-combatants integrated within the reformed security sector should be sus- tainable through national budgets. Supporting measures to enhance management and oversight of security budgeting provide an important means to support the effective use of limited resources for DDR and SSR. Improved transparency and accountability also contributes to building trust at the national level and between national authorities and international partners.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195033,7 +195033,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3064, "Paragraph": "Given the context specific ways that DDR and SSR can influence each other, there is no ideal model for integrated DDR-SSR funding. Increased use of multi-donor trust funds that address both issues represents one potential means to more effectively integrate DDR and SSR through pooled funding. National ownership is a key consideration: funding support for DDR\/SSR should reflect the absorptive capacity of the state, including national resource limitations. In particular, the levels of ex-combatants integrated within the reformed security sector should be sus- tainable through national budgets. Supporting measures to enhance management and oversight of security budgeting provide an important means to support the effective use of limited resources for DDR and SSR. Improved transparency and accountability also contributes to building trust at the national level and between national authorities and international partners.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195051,7 +195051,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3065, "Paragraph": "The following is an indicative checklist for considering DDR-SSR linkages. Without being exhaustive, it summarises key points emerging from the module relevant for policy mak- ers and practitioners.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195069,7 +195069,7 @@ "ParagraphID": 3065, "Paragraph": "The following is an indicative checklist for considering DDR-SSR linkages. Without being exhaustive, it summarises key points emerging from the module relevant for policy mak- ers and practitioners.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195085,9 +195085,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3066, - "Paragraph": "Have measures been taken to engage both DDR and SSR experts in the negotiation of peace agreements so that provisions for the two are mutually supportive? \\n Are a broad range of stakeholders involved in discussions on DDR and SSR in peace negotiations including civil society and relevant regional organisations? \\n Do decisions reflect a nationally-driven vision of the role, objective and values for the security forces? \\n Have SSR considerations been introduced into DDR decision-making and vice versa? Do assessments include the concerns of all stakeholders, including national and inter- national partners? \\n Have SSR experts commented on the terms of reference of the assess- ment and participated in the assessment mission? \\n Is monitoring and evaluation carried out systematically and are efforts made to link it with SSR? Is M&E used as an entry-point for linking DDR and SSR concerns in planning?", + "Paragraph": "Have measures been taken to engage both DDR and SSR experts in the negotiation of peace agreements so that provisions for the two are mutually supportive? \n Are a broad range of stakeholders involved in discussions on DDR and SSR in peace negotiations including civil society and relevant regional organisations? \n Do decisions reflect a nationally-driven vision of the role, objective and values for the security forces? \n Have SSR considerations been introduced into DDR decision-making and vice versa? Do assessments include the concerns of all stakeholders, including national and inter- national partners? \n Have SSR experts commented on the terms of reference of the assess- ment and participated in the assessment mission? \n Is monitoring and evaluation carried out systematically and are efforts made to link it with SSR? Is M&E used as an entry-point for linking DDR and SSR concerns in planning?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195103,9 +195103,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3066, - "Paragraph": "Have measures been taken to engage both DDR and SSR experts in the negotiation of peace agreements so that provisions for the two are mutually supportive? \\n Are a broad range of stakeholders involved in discussions on DDR and SSR in peace negotiations including civil society and relevant regional organisations? \\n Do decisions reflect a nationally-driven vision of the role, objective and values for the security forces? \\n Have SSR considerations been introduced into DDR decision-making and vice versa? Do assessments include the concerns of all stakeholders, including national and inter- national partners? \\n Have SSR experts commented on the terms of reference of the assess- ment and participated in the assessment mission? \\n Is monitoring and evaluation carried out systematically and are efforts made to link it with SSR? Is M&E used as an entry-point for linking DDR and SSR concerns in planning?", + "Paragraph": "Have measures been taken to engage both DDR and SSR experts in the negotiation of peace agreements so that provisions for the two are mutually supportive? \n Are a broad range of stakeholders involved in discussions on DDR and SSR in peace negotiations including civil society and relevant regional organisations? \n Do decisions reflect a nationally-driven vision of the role, objective and values for the security forces? \n Have SSR considerations been introduced into DDR decision-making and vice versa? Do assessments include the concerns of all stakeholders, including national and inter- national partners? \n Have SSR experts commented on the terms of reference of the assess- ment and participated in the assessment mission? \n Is monitoring and evaluation carried out systematically and are efforts made to link it with SSR? Is M&E used as an entry-point for linking DDR and SSR concerns in planning?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195114,16 +195114,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.1. General", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Are a broad range of stakeholders involved in discussions on DDR and SSR in peace negotiations including civil society and relevant regional organisations?", + "Sentence": "\n Are a broad range of stakeholders involved in discussions on DDR and SSR in peace negotiations including civil society and relevant regional organisations?", "newParagraph": "measure taken engage ddr ssr expert negotiation peace agreement provision two mutually supportive n broad range stakeholder involved discussion ddr ssr peace negotiation including civil society relevant regional organisation n decision reflect nationallydriven vision role objective value security force n ssr consideration introduced ddr decisionmaking vice versa assessment include concern stakeholder including national inter national partner n ssr expert commented term reference ass ment participated assessment mission n monitoring evaluation carried systematically effort made link ssr used entrypoint linking ddr ssr concern planning", "ProcessedSent": "n broad range stakeholder involved discussion ddr ssr peace negotiation including civil society relevant regional organisation", "SentID": 10839 }, { "ParagraphID": 3066, - "Paragraph": "Have measures been taken to engage both DDR and SSR experts in the negotiation of peace agreements so that provisions for the two are mutually supportive? \\n Are a broad range of stakeholders involved in discussions on DDR and SSR in peace negotiations including civil society and relevant regional organisations? \\n Do decisions reflect a nationally-driven vision of the role, objective and values for the security forces? \\n Have SSR considerations been introduced into DDR decision-making and vice versa? Do assessments include the concerns of all stakeholders, including national and inter- national partners? \\n Have SSR experts commented on the terms of reference of the assess- ment and participated in the assessment mission? \\n Is monitoring and evaluation carried out systematically and are efforts made to link it with SSR? Is M&E used as an entry-point for linking DDR and SSR concerns in planning?", + "Paragraph": "Have measures been taken to engage both DDR and SSR experts in the negotiation of peace agreements so that provisions for the two are mutually supportive? \n Are a broad range of stakeholders involved in discussions on DDR and SSR in peace negotiations including civil society and relevant regional organisations? \n Do decisions reflect a nationally-driven vision of the role, objective and values for the security forces? \n Have SSR considerations been introduced into DDR decision-making and vice versa? Do assessments include the concerns of all stakeholders, including national and inter- national partners? \n Have SSR experts commented on the terms of reference of the assess- ment and participated in the assessment mission? \n Is monitoring and evaluation carried out systematically and are efforts made to link it with SSR? Is M&E used as an entry-point for linking DDR and SSR concerns in planning?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195132,16 +195132,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.1. General", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Do decisions reflect a nationally-driven vision of the role, objective and values for the security forces?", + "Sentence": "\n Do decisions reflect a nationally-driven vision of the role, objective and values for the security forces?", "newParagraph": "measure taken engage ddr ssr expert negotiation peace agreement provision two mutually supportive n broad range stakeholder involved discussion ddr ssr peace negotiation including civil society relevant regional organisation n decision reflect nationallydriven vision role objective value security force n ssr consideration introduced ddr decisionmaking vice versa assessment include concern stakeholder including national inter national partner n ssr expert commented term reference ass ment participated assessment mission n monitoring evaluation carried systematically effort made link ssr used entrypoint linking ddr ssr concern planning", "ProcessedSent": "n decision reflect nationallydriven vision role objective value security force", "SentID": 10840 }, { "ParagraphID": 3066, - "Paragraph": "Have measures been taken to engage both DDR and SSR experts in the negotiation of peace agreements so that provisions for the two are mutually supportive? \\n Are a broad range of stakeholders involved in discussions on DDR and SSR in peace negotiations including civil society and relevant regional organisations? \\n Do decisions reflect a nationally-driven vision of the role, objective and values for the security forces? \\n Have SSR considerations been introduced into DDR decision-making and vice versa? Do assessments include the concerns of all stakeholders, including national and inter- national partners? \\n Have SSR experts commented on the terms of reference of the assess- ment and participated in the assessment mission? \\n Is monitoring and evaluation carried out systematically and are efforts made to link it with SSR? Is M&E used as an entry-point for linking DDR and SSR concerns in planning?", + "Paragraph": "Have measures been taken to engage both DDR and SSR experts in the negotiation of peace agreements so that provisions for the two are mutually supportive? \n Are a broad range of stakeholders involved in discussions on DDR and SSR in peace negotiations including civil society and relevant regional organisations? \n Do decisions reflect a nationally-driven vision of the role, objective and values for the security forces? \n Have SSR considerations been introduced into DDR decision-making and vice versa? Do assessments include the concerns of all stakeholders, including national and inter- national partners? \n Have SSR experts commented on the terms of reference of the assess- ment and participated in the assessment mission? \n Is monitoring and evaluation carried out systematically and are efforts made to link it with SSR? Is M&E used as an entry-point for linking DDR and SSR concerns in planning?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195150,16 +195150,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.1. General", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Have SSR considerations been introduced into DDR decision-making and vice versa?", + "Sentence": "\n Have SSR considerations been introduced into DDR decision-making and vice versa?", "newParagraph": "measure taken engage ddr ssr expert negotiation peace agreement provision two mutually supportive n broad range stakeholder involved discussion ddr ssr peace negotiation including civil society relevant regional organisation n decision reflect nationallydriven vision role objective value security force n ssr consideration introduced ddr decisionmaking vice versa assessment include concern stakeholder including national inter national partner n ssr expert commented term reference ass ment participated assessment mission n monitoring evaluation carried systematically effort made link ssr used entrypoint linking ddr ssr concern planning", "ProcessedSent": "n ssr consideration introduced ddr decisionmaking vice versa", "SentID": 10841 }, { "ParagraphID": 3066, - "Paragraph": "Have measures been taken to engage both DDR and SSR experts in the negotiation of peace agreements so that provisions for the two are mutually supportive? \\n Are a broad range of stakeholders involved in discussions on DDR and SSR in peace negotiations including civil society and relevant regional organisations? \\n Do decisions reflect a nationally-driven vision of the role, objective and values for the security forces? \\n Have SSR considerations been introduced into DDR decision-making and vice versa? Do assessments include the concerns of all stakeholders, including national and inter- national partners? \\n Have SSR experts commented on the terms of reference of the assess- ment and participated in the assessment mission? \\n Is monitoring and evaluation carried out systematically and are efforts made to link it with SSR? Is M&E used as an entry-point for linking DDR and SSR concerns in planning?", + "Paragraph": "Have measures been taken to engage both DDR and SSR experts in the negotiation of peace agreements so that provisions for the two are mutually supportive? \n Are a broad range of stakeholders involved in discussions on DDR and SSR in peace negotiations including civil society and relevant regional organisations? \n Do decisions reflect a nationally-driven vision of the role, objective and values for the security forces? \n Have SSR considerations been introduced into DDR decision-making and vice versa? Do assessments include the concerns of all stakeholders, including national and inter- national partners? \n Have SSR experts commented on the terms of reference of the assess- ment and participated in the assessment mission? \n Is monitoring and evaluation carried out systematically and are efforts made to link it with SSR? Is M&E used as an entry-point for linking DDR and SSR concerns in planning?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195175,9 +195175,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3066, - "Paragraph": "Have measures been taken to engage both DDR and SSR experts in the negotiation of peace agreements so that provisions for the two are mutually supportive? \\n Are a broad range of stakeholders involved in discussions on DDR and SSR in peace negotiations including civil society and relevant regional organisations? \\n Do decisions reflect a nationally-driven vision of the role, objective and values for the security forces? \\n Have SSR considerations been introduced into DDR decision-making and vice versa? Do assessments include the concerns of all stakeholders, including national and inter- national partners? \\n Have SSR experts commented on the terms of reference of the assess- ment and participated in the assessment mission? \\n Is monitoring and evaluation carried out systematically and are efforts made to link it with SSR? Is M&E used as an entry-point for linking DDR and SSR concerns in planning?", + "Paragraph": "Have measures been taken to engage both DDR and SSR experts in the negotiation of peace agreements so that provisions for the two are mutually supportive? \n Are a broad range of stakeholders involved in discussions on DDR and SSR in peace negotiations including civil society and relevant regional organisations? \n Do decisions reflect a nationally-driven vision of the role, objective and values for the security forces? \n Have SSR considerations been introduced into DDR decision-making and vice versa? Do assessments include the concerns of all stakeholders, including national and inter- national partners? \n Have SSR experts commented on the terms of reference of the assess- ment and participated in the assessment mission? \n Is monitoring and evaluation carried out systematically and are efforts made to link it with SSR? Is M&E used as an entry-point for linking DDR and SSR concerns in planning?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195186,16 +195186,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.1. General", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Have SSR experts commented on the terms of reference of the assess- ment and participated in the assessment mission?", + "Sentence": "\n Have SSR experts commented on the terms of reference of the assess- ment and participated in the assessment mission?", "newParagraph": "measure taken engage ddr ssr expert negotiation peace agreement provision two mutually supportive n broad range stakeholder involved discussion ddr ssr peace negotiation including civil society relevant regional organisation n decision reflect nationallydriven vision role objective value security force n ssr consideration introduced ddr decisionmaking vice versa assessment include concern stakeholder including national inter national partner n ssr expert commented term reference ass ment participated assessment mission n monitoring evaluation carried systematically effort made link ssr used entrypoint linking ddr ssr concern planning", "ProcessedSent": "n ssr expert commented term reference ass ment participated assessment mission", "SentID": 10843 }, { "ParagraphID": 3066, - "Paragraph": "Have measures been taken to engage both DDR and SSR experts in the negotiation of peace agreements so that provisions for the two are mutually supportive? \\n Are a broad range of stakeholders involved in discussions on DDR and SSR in peace negotiations including civil society and relevant regional organisations? \\n Do decisions reflect a nationally-driven vision of the role, objective and values for the security forces? \\n Have SSR considerations been introduced into DDR decision-making and vice versa? Do assessments include the concerns of all stakeholders, including national and inter- national partners? \\n Have SSR experts commented on the terms of reference of the assess- ment and participated in the assessment mission? \\n Is monitoring and evaluation carried out systematically and are efforts made to link it with SSR? Is M&E used as an entry-point for linking DDR and SSR concerns in planning?", + "Paragraph": "Have measures been taken to engage both DDR and SSR experts in the negotiation of peace agreements so that provisions for the two are mutually supportive? \n Are a broad range of stakeholders involved in discussions on DDR and SSR in peace negotiations including civil society and relevant regional organisations? \n Do decisions reflect a nationally-driven vision of the role, objective and values for the security forces? \n Have SSR considerations been introduced into DDR decision-making and vice versa? Do assessments include the concerns of all stakeholders, including national and inter- national partners? \n Have SSR experts commented on the terms of reference of the assess- ment and participated in the assessment mission? \n Is monitoring and evaluation carried out systematically and are efforts made to link it with SSR? Is M&E used as an entry-point for linking DDR and SSR concerns in planning?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195204,16 +195204,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.1. General", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Is monitoring and evaluation carried out systematically and are efforts made to link it with SSR?", + "Sentence": "\n Is monitoring and evaluation carried out systematically and are efforts made to link it with SSR?", "newParagraph": "measure taken engage ddr ssr expert negotiation peace agreement provision two mutually supportive n broad range stakeholder involved discussion ddr ssr peace negotiation including civil society relevant regional organisation n decision reflect nationallydriven vision role objective value security force n ssr consideration introduced ddr decisionmaking vice versa assessment include concern stakeholder including national inter national partner n ssr expert commented term reference ass ment participated assessment mission n monitoring evaluation carried systematically effort made link ssr used entrypoint linking ddr ssr concern planning", "ProcessedSent": "n monitoring evaluation carried systematically effort made link ssr", "SentID": 10844 }, { "ParagraphID": 3066, - "Paragraph": "Have measures been taken to engage both DDR and SSR experts in the negotiation of peace agreements so that provisions for the two are mutually supportive? \\n Are a broad range of stakeholders involved in discussions on DDR and SSR in peace negotiations including civil society and relevant regional organisations? \\n Do decisions reflect a nationally-driven vision of the role, objective and values for the security forces? \\n Have SSR considerations been introduced into DDR decision-making and vice versa? Do assessments include the concerns of all stakeholders, including national and inter- national partners? \\n Have SSR experts commented on the terms of reference of the assess- ment and participated in the assessment mission? \\n Is monitoring and evaluation carried out systematically and are efforts made to link it with SSR? Is M&E used as an entry-point for linking DDR and SSR concerns in planning?", + "Paragraph": "Have measures been taken to engage both DDR and SSR experts in the negotiation of peace agreements so that provisions for the two are mutually supportive? \n Are a broad range of stakeholders involved in discussions on DDR and SSR in peace negotiations including civil society and relevant regional organisations? \n Do decisions reflect a nationally-driven vision of the role, objective and values for the security forces? \n Have SSR considerations been introduced into DDR decision-making and vice versa? Do assessments include the concerns of all stakeholders, including national and inter- national partners? \n Have SSR experts commented on the terms of reference of the assess- ment and participated in the assessment mission? \n Is monitoring and evaluation carried out systematically and are efforts made to link it with SSR? Is M&E used as an entry-point for linking DDR and SSR concerns in planning?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195229,9 +195229,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3067, - "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \\n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \\n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \\n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \\n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \\n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \\n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \\n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \\n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \\n\\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \\n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \\n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \\n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \\n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \\n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", + "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \n\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195240,16 +195240,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.2. Programming and planning", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Programming and planning \\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \\n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR?", + "Sentence": "Programming and planning \n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR?", "newParagraph": "programming planning n ssrddr dynamic demobilization n potential longterm use demobilization disarmament site fac tored planning ddr n disarmament programme complemented security sector training activity improve national control stock weapon ammunition security sector census consideredimplemented support human financial resource management inform integration decision n clear criterion developed entry excombatants security sector reflect national security priority well capacity security force absorb provision made vetting ensure appropriate skill consid eration past conduct n rank harmonisation policy introduced establish formula con version former armed group national armed force result dialogue considered need affirmative action marginalised group n sustainable distribution excombatants reintegration inte gration programme information disseminated counselling offered excombatants facing voluntary choice integration reintegration n measure taken identify address potential security vacuum place excombatants demobilized information shared rel evant authority security concern related dependent taken account n effort made actively encourage female excombatants enter ddr process offered choice integrate security sector appropriate action taken ensure security institution provide woman fair equal treatment including realistic employment opportunity n communicationstraining strategy place include message specifi cally designed facilitate transition combatant security provider including behaviour change hiv risk gbv nn ssrddr dynamic reintegration n data collected return reintegration excombatants analysed order coordinate relevant ddr ssr activity n capacitybuilding within security sector prioritised way ensure security institution capable supporting ddr objective n excombatants sensitised availability housing land property dispute mechanism n case private security body source employment excombatants effort actively made ensure regulation appropriate vetting mech anisms place n border management service sensitised trained issue relating crossborder flow excombatants", "ProcessedSent": "programming planning n ssrddr dynamic demobilization n potential longterm use demobilization disarmament site fac tored planning ddr", "SentID": 10846 }, { "ParagraphID": 3067, - "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \\n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \\n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \\n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \\n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \\n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \\n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \\n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \\n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \\n\\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \\n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \\n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \\n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \\n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \\n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", + "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \n\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195258,16 +195258,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.2. Programming and planning", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition?", + "Sentence": "\n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition?", "newParagraph": "programming planning n ssrddr dynamic demobilization n potential longterm use demobilization disarmament site fac tored planning ddr n disarmament programme complemented security sector training activity improve national control stock weapon ammunition security sector census consideredimplemented support human financial resource management inform integration decision n clear criterion developed entry excombatants security sector reflect national security priority well capacity security force absorb provision made vetting ensure appropriate skill consid eration past conduct n rank harmonisation policy introduced establish formula con version former armed group national armed force result dialogue considered need affirmative action marginalised group n sustainable distribution excombatants reintegration inte gration programme information disseminated counselling offered excombatants facing voluntary choice integration reintegration n measure taken identify address potential security vacuum place excombatants demobilized information shared rel evant authority security concern related dependent taken account n effort made actively encourage female excombatants enter ddr process offered choice integrate security sector appropriate action taken ensure security institution provide woman fair equal treatment including realistic employment opportunity n communicationstraining strategy place include message specifi cally designed facilitate transition combatant security provider including behaviour change hiv risk gbv nn ssrddr dynamic reintegration n data collected return reintegration excombatants analysed order coordinate relevant ddr ssr activity n capacitybuilding within security sector prioritised way ensure security institution capable supporting ddr objective n excombatants sensitised availability housing land property dispute mechanism n case private security body source employment excombatants effort actively made ensure regulation appropriate vetting mech anisms place n border management service sensitised trained issue relating crossborder flow excombatants", "ProcessedSent": "n disarmament programme complemented security sector training activity improve national control stock weapon ammunition", "SentID": 10847 }, { "ParagraphID": 3067, - "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \\n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \\n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \\n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \\n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \\n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \\n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \\n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \\n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \\n\\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \\n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \\n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \\n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \\n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \\n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", + "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \n\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195283,9 +195283,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3067, - "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \\n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \\n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \\n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \\n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \\n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \\n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \\n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \\n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \\n\\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \\n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \\n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \\n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \\n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \\n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", + "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \n\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195294,16 +195294,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.2. Programming and planning", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector?", + "Sentence": "\n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector?", "newParagraph": "programming planning n ssrddr dynamic demobilization n potential longterm use demobilization disarmament site fac tored planning ddr n disarmament programme complemented security sector training activity improve national control stock weapon ammunition security sector census consideredimplemented support human financial resource management inform integration decision n clear criterion developed entry excombatants security sector reflect national security priority well capacity security force absorb provision made vetting ensure appropriate skill consid eration past conduct n rank harmonisation policy introduced establish formula con version former armed group national armed force result dialogue considered need affirmative action marginalised group n sustainable distribution excombatants reintegration inte gration programme information disseminated counselling offered excombatants facing voluntary choice integration reintegration n measure taken identify address potential security vacuum place excombatants demobilized information shared rel evant authority security concern related dependent taken account n effort made actively encourage female excombatants enter ddr process offered choice integrate security sector appropriate action taken ensure security institution provide woman fair equal treatment including realistic employment opportunity n communicationstraining strategy place include message specifi cally designed facilitate transition combatant security provider including behaviour change hiv risk gbv nn ssrddr dynamic reintegration n data collected return reintegration excombatants analysed order coordinate relevant ddr ssr activity n capacitybuilding within security sector prioritised way ensure security institution capable supporting ddr objective n excombatants sensitised availability housing land property dispute mechanism n case private security body source employment excombatants effort actively made ensure regulation appropriate vetting mech anisms place n border management service sensitised trained issue relating crossborder flow excombatants", "ProcessedSent": "n clear criterion developed entry excombatants security sector", "SentID": 10849 }, { "ParagraphID": 3067, - "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \\n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \\n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \\n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \\n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \\n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \\n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \\n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \\n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \\n\\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \\n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \\n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \\n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \\n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \\n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", + "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \n\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195319,9 +195319,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3067, - "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \\n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \\n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \\n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \\n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \\n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \\n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \\n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \\n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \\n\\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \\n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \\n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \\n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \\n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \\n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", + "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \n\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195337,9 +195337,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3067, - "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \\n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \\n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \\n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \\n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \\n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \\n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \\n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \\n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \\n\\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \\n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \\n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \\n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \\n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \\n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", + "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \n\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195348,16 +195348,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.2. Programming and planning", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces?", + "Sentence": "\n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces?", "newParagraph": "programming planning n ssrddr dynamic demobilization n potential longterm use demobilization disarmament site fac tored planning ddr n disarmament programme complemented security sector training activity improve national control stock weapon ammunition security sector census consideredimplemented support human financial resource management inform integration decision n clear criterion developed entry excombatants security sector reflect national security priority well capacity security force absorb provision made vetting ensure appropriate skill consid eration past conduct n rank harmonisation policy introduced establish formula con version former armed group national armed force result dialogue considered need affirmative action marginalised group n sustainable distribution excombatants reintegration inte gration programme information disseminated counselling offered excombatants facing voluntary choice integration reintegration n measure taken identify address potential security vacuum place excombatants demobilized information shared rel evant authority security concern related dependent taken account n effort made actively encourage female excombatants enter ddr process offered choice integrate security sector appropriate action taken ensure security institution provide woman fair equal treatment including realistic employment opportunity n communicationstraining strategy place include message specifi cally designed facilitate transition combatant security provider including behaviour change hiv risk gbv nn ssrddr dynamic reintegration n data collected return reintegration excombatants analysed order coordinate relevant ddr ssr activity n capacitybuilding within security sector prioritised way ensure security institution capable supporting ddr objective n excombatants sensitised availability housing land property dispute mechanism n case private security body source employment excombatants effort actively made ensure regulation appropriate vetting mech anisms place n border management service sensitised trained issue relating crossborder flow excombatants", "ProcessedSent": "n rank harmonisation policy introduced establish formula con version former armed group national armed force", "SentID": 10852 }, { "ParagraphID": 3067, - "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \\n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \\n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \\n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \\n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \\n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \\n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \\n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \\n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \\n\\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \\n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \\n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \\n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \\n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \\n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", + "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \n\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195373,9 +195373,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3067, - "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \\n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \\n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \\n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \\n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \\n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \\n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \\n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \\n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \\n\\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \\n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \\n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \\n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \\n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \\n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", + "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \n\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195384,16 +195384,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.2. Programming and planning", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes?", + "Sentence": "\n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes?", "newParagraph": "programming planning n ssrddr dynamic demobilization n potential longterm use demobilization disarmament site fac tored planning ddr n disarmament programme complemented security sector training activity improve national control stock weapon ammunition security sector census consideredimplemented support human financial resource management inform integration decision n clear criterion developed entry excombatants security sector reflect national security priority well capacity security force absorb provision made vetting ensure appropriate skill consid eration past conduct n rank harmonisation policy introduced establish formula con version former armed group national armed force result dialogue considered need affirmative action marginalised group n sustainable distribution excombatants reintegration inte gration programme information disseminated counselling offered excombatants facing voluntary choice integration reintegration n measure taken identify address potential security vacuum place excombatants demobilized information shared rel evant authority security concern related dependent taken account n effort made actively encourage female excombatants enter ddr process offered choice integrate security sector appropriate action taken ensure security institution provide woman fair equal treatment including realistic employment opportunity n communicationstraining strategy place include message specifi cally designed facilitate transition combatant security provider including behaviour change hiv risk gbv nn ssrddr dynamic reintegration n data collected return reintegration excombatants analysed order coordinate relevant ddr ssr activity n capacitybuilding within security sector prioritised way ensure security institution capable supporting ddr objective n excombatants sensitised availability housing land property dispute mechanism n case private security body source employment excombatants effort actively made ensure regulation appropriate vetting mech anisms place n border management service sensitised trained issue relating crossborder flow excombatants", "ProcessedSent": "n sustainable distribution excombatants reintegration inte gration programme", "SentID": 10854 }, { "ParagraphID": 3067, - "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \\n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \\n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \\n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \\n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \\n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \\n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \\n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \\n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \\n\\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \\n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \\n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \\n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \\n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \\n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", + "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \n\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195409,9 +195409,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3067, - "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \\n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \\n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \\n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \\n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \\n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \\n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \\n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \\n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \\n\\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \\n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \\n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \\n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \\n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \\n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", + "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \n\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195420,16 +195420,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.2. Programming and planning", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities?", + "Sentence": "\n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities?", "newParagraph": "programming planning n ssrddr dynamic demobilization n potential longterm use demobilization disarmament site fac tored planning ddr n disarmament programme complemented security sector training activity improve national control stock weapon ammunition security sector census consideredimplemented support human financial resource management inform integration decision n clear criterion developed entry excombatants security sector reflect national security priority well capacity security force absorb provision made vetting ensure appropriate skill consid eration past conduct n rank harmonisation policy introduced establish formula con version former armed group national armed force result dialogue considered need affirmative action marginalised group n sustainable distribution excombatants reintegration inte gration programme information disseminated counselling offered excombatants facing voluntary choice integration reintegration n measure taken identify address potential security vacuum place excombatants demobilized information shared rel evant authority security concern related dependent taken account n effort made actively encourage female excombatants enter ddr process offered choice integrate security sector appropriate action taken ensure security institution provide woman fair equal treatment including realistic employment opportunity n communicationstraining strategy place include message specifi cally designed facilitate transition combatant security provider including behaviour change hiv risk gbv nn ssrddr dynamic reintegration n data collected return reintegration excombatants analysed order coordinate relevant ddr ssr activity n capacitybuilding within security sector prioritised way ensure security institution capable supporting ddr objective n excombatants sensitised availability housing land property dispute mechanism n case private security body source employment excombatants effort actively made ensure regulation appropriate vetting mech anisms place n border management service sensitised trained issue relating crossborder flow excombatants", "ProcessedSent": "n measure taken identify address potential security vacuum place excombatants demobilized information shared rel evant authority", "SentID": 10856 }, { "ParagraphID": 3067, - "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \\n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \\n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \\n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \\n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \\n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \\n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \\n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \\n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \\n\\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \\n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \\n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \\n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \\n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \\n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", + "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \n\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195445,9 +195445,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3067, - "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \\n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \\n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \\n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \\n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \\n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \\n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \\n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \\n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \\n\\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \\n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \\n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \\n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \\n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \\n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", + "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \n\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195456,16 +195456,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.2. Programming and planning", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process?", + "Sentence": "\n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process?", "newParagraph": "programming planning n ssrddr dynamic demobilization n potential longterm use demobilization disarmament site fac tored planning ddr n disarmament programme complemented security sector training activity improve national control stock weapon ammunition security sector census consideredimplemented support human financial resource management inform integration decision n clear criterion developed entry excombatants security sector reflect national security priority well capacity security force absorb provision made vetting ensure appropriate skill consid eration past conduct n rank harmonisation policy introduced establish formula con version former armed group national armed force result dialogue considered need affirmative action marginalised group n sustainable distribution excombatants reintegration inte gration programme information disseminated counselling offered excombatants facing voluntary choice integration reintegration n measure taken identify address potential security vacuum place excombatants demobilized information shared rel evant authority security concern related dependent taken account n effort made actively encourage female excombatants enter ddr process offered choice integrate security sector appropriate action taken ensure security institution provide woman fair equal treatment including realistic employment opportunity n communicationstraining strategy place include message specifi cally designed facilitate transition combatant security provider including behaviour change hiv risk gbv nn ssrddr dynamic reintegration n data collected return reintegration excombatants analysed order coordinate relevant ddr ssr activity n capacitybuilding within security sector prioritised way ensure security institution capable supporting ddr objective n excombatants sensitised availability housing land property dispute mechanism n case private security body source employment excombatants effort actively made ensure regulation appropriate vetting mech anisms place n border management service sensitised trained issue relating crossborder flow excombatants", "ProcessedSent": "n effort made actively encourage female excombatants enter ddr process", "SentID": 10858 }, { "ParagraphID": 3067, - "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \\n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \\n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \\n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \\n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \\n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \\n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \\n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \\n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \\n\\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \\n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \\n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \\n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \\n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \\n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", + "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \n\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195481,9 +195481,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3067, - "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \\n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \\n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \\n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \\n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \\n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \\n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \\n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \\n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \\n\\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \\n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \\n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \\n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \\n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \\n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", + "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \n\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195499,9 +195499,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3067, - "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \\n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \\n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \\n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \\n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \\n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \\n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \\n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \\n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \\n\\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \\n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \\n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \\n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \\n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \\n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", + "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \n\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195510,16 +195510,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.2. Programming and planning", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place?", + "Sentence": "\n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place?", "newParagraph": "programming planning n ssrddr dynamic demobilization n potential longterm use demobilization disarmament site fac tored planning ddr n disarmament programme complemented security sector training activity improve national control stock weapon ammunition security sector census consideredimplemented support human financial resource management inform integration decision n clear criterion developed entry excombatants security sector reflect national security priority well capacity security force absorb provision made vetting ensure appropriate skill consid eration past conduct n rank harmonisation policy introduced establish formula con version former armed group national armed force result dialogue considered need affirmative action marginalised group n sustainable distribution excombatants reintegration inte gration programme information disseminated counselling offered excombatants facing voluntary choice integration reintegration n measure taken identify address potential security vacuum place excombatants demobilized information shared rel evant authority security concern related dependent taken account n effort made actively encourage female excombatants enter ddr process offered choice integrate security sector appropriate action taken ensure security institution provide woman fair equal treatment including realistic employment opportunity n communicationstraining strategy place include message specifi cally designed facilitate transition combatant security provider including behaviour change hiv risk gbv nn ssrddr dynamic reintegration n data collected return reintegration excombatants analysed order coordinate relevant ddr ssr activity n capacitybuilding within security sector prioritised way ensure security institution capable supporting ddr objective n excombatants sensitised availability housing land property dispute mechanism n case private security body source employment excombatants effort actively made ensure regulation appropriate vetting mech anisms place n border management service sensitised trained issue relating crossborder flow excombatants", "ProcessedSent": "n communicationstraining strategy place", "SentID": 10861 }, { "ParagraphID": 3067, - "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \\n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \\n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \\n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \\n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \\n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \\n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \\n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \\n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \\n\\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \\n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \\n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \\n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \\n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \\n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", + "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \n\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195535,9 +195535,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3067, - "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \\n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \\n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \\n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \\n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \\n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \\n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \\n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \\n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \\n\\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \\n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \\n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \\n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \\n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \\n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", + "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \n\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195546,16 +195546,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.2. Programming and planning", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \\n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants?", + "Sentence": "\n\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants?", "newParagraph": "programming planning n ssrddr dynamic demobilization n potential longterm use demobilization disarmament site fac tored planning ddr n disarmament programme complemented security sector training activity improve national control stock weapon ammunition security sector census consideredimplemented support human financial resource management inform integration decision n clear criterion developed entry excombatants security sector reflect national security priority well capacity security force absorb provision made vetting ensure appropriate skill consid eration past conduct n rank harmonisation policy introduced establish formula con version former armed group national armed force result dialogue considered need affirmative action marginalised group n sustainable distribution excombatants reintegration inte gration programme information disseminated counselling offered excombatants facing voluntary choice integration reintegration n measure taken identify address potential security vacuum place excombatants demobilized information shared rel evant authority security concern related dependent taken account n effort made actively encourage female excombatants enter ddr process offered choice integrate security sector appropriate action taken ensure security institution provide woman fair equal treatment including realistic employment opportunity n communicationstraining strategy place include message specifi cally designed facilitate transition combatant security provider including behaviour change hiv risk gbv nn ssrddr dynamic reintegration n data collected return reintegration excombatants analysed order coordinate relevant ddr ssr activity n capacitybuilding within security sector prioritised way ensure security institution capable supporting ddr objective n excombatants sensitised availability housing land property dispute mechanism n case private security body source employment excombatants effort actively made ensure regulation appropriate vetting mech anisms place n border management service sensitised trained issue relating crossborder flow excombatants", "ProcessedSent": "nn ssrddr dynamic reintegration n data collected return reintegration excombatants", "SentID": 10863 }, { "ParagraphID": 3067, - "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \\n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \\n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \\n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \\n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \\n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \\n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \\n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \\n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \\n\\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \\n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \\n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \\n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \\n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \\n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", + "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \n\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195571,9 +195571,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3067, - "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \\n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \\n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \\n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \\n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \\n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \\n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \\n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \\n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \\n\\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \\n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \\n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \\n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \\n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \\n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", + "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \n\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195582,16 +195582,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.2. Programming and planning", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives?", + "Sentence": "\n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives?", "newParagraph": "programming planning n ssrddr dynamic demobilization n potential longterm use demobilization disarmament site fac tored planning ddr n disarmament programme complemented security sector training activity improve national control stock weapon ammunition security sector census consideredimplemented support human financial resource management inform integration decision n clear criterion developed entry excombatants security sector reflect national security priority well capacity security force absorb provision made vetting ensure appropriate skill consid eration past conduct n rank harmonisation policy introduced establish formula con version former armed group national armed force result dialogue considered need affirmative action marginalised group n sustainable distribution excombatants reintegration inte gration programme information disseminated counselling offered excombatants facing voluntary choice integration reintegration n measure taken identify address potential security vacuum place excombatants demobilized information shared rel evant authority security concern related dependent taken account n effort made actively encourage female excombatants enter ddr process offered choice integrate security sector appropriate action taken ensure security institution provide woman fair equal treatment including realistic employment opportunity n communicationstraining strategy place include message specifi cally designed facilitate transition combatant security provider including behaviour change hiv risk gbv nn ssrddr dynamic reintegration n data collected return reintegration excombatants analysed order coordinate relevant ddr ssr activity n capacitybuilding within security sector prioritised way ensure security institution capable supporting ddr objective n excombatants sensitised availability housing land property dispute mechanism n case private security body source employment excombatants effort actively made ensure regulation appropriate vetting mech anisms place n border management service sensitised trained issue relating crossborder flow excombatants", "ProcessedSent": "n capacitybuilding within security sector prioritised way ensure security institution capable supporting ddr objective", "SentID": 10865 }, { "ParagraphID": 3067, - "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \\n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \\n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \\n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \\n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \\n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \\n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \\n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \\n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \\n\\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \\n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \\n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \\n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \\n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \\n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", + "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \n\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195600,16 +195600,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.2. Programming and planning", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms?", + "Sentence": "\n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms?", "newParagraph": "programming planning n ssrddr dynamic demobilization n potential longterm use demobilization disarmament site fac tored planning ddr n disarmament programme complemented security sector training activity improve national control stock weapon ammunition security sector census consideredimplemented support human financial resource management inform integration decision n clear criterion developed entry excombatants security sector reflect national security priority well capacity security force absorb provision made vetting ensure appropriate skill consid eration past conduct n rank harmonisation policy introduced establish formula con version former armed group national armed force result dialogue considered need affirmative action marginalised group n sustainable distribution excombatants reintegration inte gration programme information disseminated counselling offered excombatants facing voluntary choice integration reintegration n measure taken identify address potential security vacuum place excombatants demobilized information shared rel evant authority security concern related dependent taken account n effort made actively encourage female excombatants enter ddr process offered choice integrate security sector appropriate action taken ensure security institution provide woman fair equal treatment including realistic employment opportunity n communicationstraining strategy place include message specifi cally designed facilitate transition combatant security provider including behaviour change hiv risk gbv nn ssrddr dynamic reintegration n data collected return reintegration excombatants analysed order coordinate relevant ddr ssr activity n capacitybuilding within security sector prioritised way ensure security institution capable supporting ddr objective n excombatants sensitised availability housing land property dispute mechanism n case private security body source employment excombatants effort actively made ensure regulation appropriate vetting mech anisms place n border management service sensitised trained issue relating crossborder flow excombatants", "ProcessedSent": "n excombatants sensitised availability housing land property dispute mechanism", "SentID": 10866 }, { "ParagraphID": 3067, - "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \\n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \\n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \\n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \\n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \\n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \\n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \\n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \\n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \\n\\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \\n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \\n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \\n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \\n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \\n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", + "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \n\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195618,16 +195618,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.2. Programming and planning", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place?", + "Sentence": "\n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place?", "newParagraph": "programming planning n ssrddr dynamic demobilization n potential longterm use demobilization disarmament site fac tored planning ddr n disarmament programme complemented security sector training activity improve national control stock weapon ammunition security sector census consideredimplemented support human financial resource management inform integration decision n clear criterion developed entry excombatants security sector reflect national security priority well capacity security force absorb provision made vetting ensure appropriate skill consid eration past conduct n rank harmonisation policy introduced establish formula con version former armed group national armed force result dialogue considered need affirmative action marginalised group n sustainable distribution excombatants reintegration inte gration programme information disseminated counselling offered excombatants facing voluntary choice integration reintegration n measure taken identify address potential security vacuum place excombatants demobilized information shared rel evant authority security concern related dependent taken account n effort made actively encourage female excombatants enter ddr process offered choice integrate security sector appropriate action taken ensure security institution provide woman fair equal treatment including realistic employment opportunity n communicationstraining strategy place include message specifi cally designed facilitate transition combatant security provider including behaviour change hiv risk gbv nn ssrddr dynamic reintegration n data collected return reintegration excombatants analysed order coordinate relevant ddr ssr activity n capacitybuilding within security sector prioritised way ensure security institution capable supporting ddr objective n excombatants sensitised availability housing land property dispute mechanism n case private security body source employment excombatants effort actively made ensure regulation appropriate vetting mech anisms place n border management service sensitised trained issue relating crossborder flow excombatants", "ProcessedSent": "n case private security body source employment excombatants effort actively made ensure regulation appropriate vetting mech anisms place", "SentID": 10867 }, { "ParagraphID": 3067, - "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \\n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \\n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \\n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \\n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \\n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \\n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \\n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \\n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \\n\\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \\n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \\n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \\n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \\n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \\n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", + "Paragraph": "Programming and planning \n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during demobilization \n Has the potential long-term use of demobilization and disarmament sites been fac- tored into planning for DDR? \n Have disarmament programmes been complemented by security sector training and other activities to improve national control over stocks of weapons and ammunition? Has a security sector census been considered\/implemented to support human and financial resource management and inform integration decisions? \n Have clear criteria been developed for entry of ex-combatants into the security sector? Does this reflect national security priorities as well as the capacity of the security forces to absorb them? Is provision made for vetting to ensure appropriate skills and consid- eration of past conduct? \n Have rank harmonisation policies been introduced which establish a formula for con- version from former armed groups to national armed forces? Was this the result of a dialogue which considered the need for affirmative action for marginalised groups? \n Is there a sustainable distribution of ex-combatants between the reintegration and inte- gration programmes? Has information been disseminated and counselling been offered to ex-combatants facing a voluntary choice between integration and reintegration? \n Have measures been taken to identify and address potential security vacuums in places where ex-combatants are demobilized, and has this information been shared with rel- evant authorities? Are security concerns related to dependents taken into account? \n Have efforts been made to actively encourage female ex-combatants to enter the DDR process? Have they been offered the choice to integrate into the security sector? Has appropriate action been taken to ensure that the security institutions provide women with fair and equal treatment, including realistic employment opportunities? \n Is there a communications\/training strategy in place? Does it include messages specifi- cally designed to facilitate the transition from combatant to security provider including behaviour change, HIV risks and GBV? \n\n SSR\/DDR dynamics before and during reintegration \n Is data collected on the return and reintegration of ex-combatants? Is this analysed in order to coordinate relevant DDR and SSR activities? \n Has capacity-building within the security sector been prioritised in a way to ensure that security institutions are capable of supporting DDR objectives? \n Have ex-combatants been sensitised to the availability of housing, land and property dispute mechanisms? \n In cases where private security bodies are a source of employment for ex-combatants, are efforts actively made to ensure their regulation and that appropriate vetting mech- anisms are in place? \n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195636,16 +195636,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.2. Programming and planning", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", + "Sentence": "\n Have border management services been sensitised and trained on issues relating to cross-border flows of ex-combatants?", "newParagraph": "programming planning n ssrddr dynamic demobilization n potential longterm use demobilization disarmament site fac tored planning ddr n disarmament programme complemented security sector training activity improve national control stock weapon ammunition security sector census consideredimplemented support human financial resource management inform integration decision n clear criterion developed entry excombatants security sector reflect national security priority well capacity security force absorb provision made vetting ensure appropriate skill consid eration past conduct n rank harmonisation policy introduced establish formula con version former armed group national armed force result dialogue considered need affirmative action marginalised group n sustainable distribution excombatants reintegration inte gration programme information disseminated counselling offered excombatants facing voluntary choice integration reintegration n measure taken identify address potential security vacuum place excombatants demobilized information shared rel evant authority security concern related dependent taken account n effort made actively encourage female excombatants enter ddr process offered choice integrate security sector appropriate action taken ensure security institution provide woman fair equal treatment including realistic employment opportunity n communicationstraining strategy place include message specifi cally designed facilitate transition combatant security provider including behaviour change hiv risk gbv nn ssrddr dynamic reintegration n data collected return reintegration excombatants analysed order coordinate relevant ddr ssr activity n capacitybuilding within security sector prioritised way ensure security institution capable supporting ddr objective n excombatants sensitised availability housing land property dispute mechanism n case private security body source employment excombatants effort actively made ensure regulation appropriate vetting mech anisms place n border management service sensitised trained issue relating crossborder flow excombatants", "ProcessedSent": "n border management service sensitised trained issue relating crossborder flow excombatants", "SentID": 10868 }, { "ParagraphID": 3068, - "Paragraph": "Communication and coordination Coordination \\n Have opportunities been taken to engage with national security sector management and oversight bodies on how they can support the DDR process? \\n Is there a mechanism that supports national dialogue and coordination across DDR and SSR? If not, could the national commission on DDR fulfil this role by inviting representatives of other ministries to selected meetings? \\n Are the specific objectives of DDR and SSR clearly set out and understood (e.g. in a \u2018letter of commitment\u2019)? Is this understanding shared by national actors and interna- tional partners as the basis for a mutually supportive approach? \\n\\n Knowledge management \\n When developing information management systems, are efforts made to also collect data that will be useful for SSR? Is there a mechanism in place to share this data? \\n Is there provision for up to date conflict and security analysis as a common basis for DDR\/SSR decision-making? \\n Have efforts been made to share information with border management authorities on high risk areas for foreign combatants transiting borders? \\n Has regular information sharing taken place with relevant security sector institutions as a basis for planning to ensure appropriate support to DDR objectives? \\n Are adequate mechanisms in place to ensure institutional memory and avoid over reliance on key individuals? Are assessment reports and other key documents retained and easily accessible in order to support lessons learned processes for DDR\/SSR?", + "Paragraph": "Communication and coordination Coordination \n Have opportunities been taken to engage with national security sector management and oversight bodies on how they can support the DDR process? \n Is there a mechanism that supports national dialogue and coordination across DDR and SSR? If not, could the national commission on DDR fulfil this role by inviting representatives of other ministries to selected meetings? \n Are the specific objectives of DDR and SSR clearly set out and understood (e.g. in a \u2018letter of commitment\u2019)? Is this understanding shared by national actors and interna- tional partners as the basis for a mutually supportive approach? \n\n Knowledge management \n When developing information management systems, are efforts made to also collect data that will be useful for SSR? Is there a mechanism in place to share this data? \n Is there provision for up to date conflict and security analysis as a common basis for DDR\/SSR decision-making? \n Have efforts been made to share information with border management authorities on high risk areas for foreign combatants transiting borders? \n Has regular information sharing taken place with relevant security sector institutions as a basis for planning to ensure appropriate support to DDR objectives? \n Are adequate mechanisms in place to ensure institutional memory and avoid over reliance on key individuals? Are assessment reports and other key documents retained and easily accessible in order to support lessons learned processes for DDR\/SSR?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195654,16 +195654,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.3. Communication and coordination", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Communication and coordination Coordination \\n Have opportunities been taken to engage with national security sector management and oversight bodies on how they can support the DDR process?", + "Sentence": "Communication and coordination Coordination \n Have opportunities been taken to engage with national security sector management and oversight bodies on how they can support the DDR process?", "newParagraph": "communication coordination coordination n opportunity taken engage national security sector management oversight body support ddr process n mechanism support national dialogue coordination across ddr ssr could national commission ddr fulfil role inviting representative ministry selected meeting n specific objective ddr ssr clearly set understood eg letter commitment understanding shared national actor interna tional partner basis mutually supportive approach nn knowledge management n developing information management system effort made also collect data useful ssr mechanism place share data n provision date conflict security analysis common basis ddrssr decisionmaking n effort made share information border management authority high risk area foreign combatant transiting border n regular information sharing taken place relevant security sector institution basis planning ensure appropriate support ddr objective n adequate mechanism place ensure institutional memory avoid reliance key individual assessment report key document retained easily accessible order support lesson learned process ddrssr", "ProcessedSent": "communication coordination coordination n opportunity taken engage national security sector management oversight body support ddr process", "SentID": 10869 }, { "ParagraphID": 3068, - "Paragraph": "Communication and coordination Coordination \\n Have opportunities been taken to engage with national security sector management and oversight bodies on how they can support the DDR process? \\n Is there a mechanism that supports national dialogue and coordination across DDR and SSR? If not, could the national commission on DDR fulfil this role by inviting representatives of other ministries to selected meetings? \\n Are the specific objectives of DDR and SSR clearly set out and understood (e.g. in a \u2018letter of commitment\u2019)? Is this understanding shared by national actors and interna- tional partners as the basis for a mutually supportive approach? \\n\\n Knowledge management \\n When developing information management systems, are efforts made to also collect data that will be useful for SSR? Is there a mechanism in place to share this data? \\n Is there provision for up to date conflict and security analysis as a common basis for DDR\/SSR decision-making? \\n Have efforts been made to share information with border management authorities on high risk areas for foreign combatants transiting borders? \\n Has regular information sharing taken place with relevant security sector institutions as a basis for planning to ensure appropriate support to DDR objectives? \\n Are adequate mechanisms in place to ensure institutional memory and avoid over reliance on key individuals? Are assessment reports and other key documents retained and easily accessible in order to support lessons learned processes for DDR\/SSR?", + "Paragraph": "Communication and coordination Coordination \n Have opportunities been taken to engage with national security sector management and oversight bodies on how they can support the DDR process? \n Is there a mechanism that supports national dialogue and coordination across DDR and SSR? If not, could the national commission on DDR fulfil this role by inviting representatives of other ministries to selected meetings? \n Are the specific objectives of DDR and SSR clearly set out and understood (e.g. in a \u2018letter of commitment\u2019)? Is this understanding shared by national actors and interna- tional partners as the basis for a mutually supportive approach? \n\n Knowledge management \n When developing information management systems, are efforts made to also collect data that will be useful for SSR? Is there a mechanism in place to share this data? \n Is there provision for up to date conflict and security analysis as a common basis for DDR\/SSR decision-making? \n Have efforts been made to share information with border management authorities on high risk areas for foreign combatants transiting borders? \n Has regular information sharing taken place with relevant security sector institutions as a basis for planning to ensure appropriate support to DDR objectives? \n Are adequate mechanisms in place to ensure institutional memory and avoid over reliance on key individuals? Are assessment reports and other key documents retained and easily accessible in order to support lessons learned processes for DDR\/SSR?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195672,16 +195672,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.3. Communication and coordination", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Is there a mechanism that supports national dialogue and coordination across DDR and SSR?", + "Sentence": "\n Is there a mechanism that supports national dialogue and coordination across DDR and SSR?", "newParagraph": "communication coordination coordination n opportunity taken engage national security sector management oversight body support ddr process n mechanism support national dialogue coordination across ddr ssr could national commission ddr fulfil role inviting representative ministry selected meeting n specific objective ddr ssr clearly set understood eg letter commitment understanding shared national actor interna tional partner basis mutually supportive approach nn knowledge management n developing information management system effort made also collect data useful ssr mechanism place share data n provision date conflict security analysis common basis ddrssr decisionmaking n effort made share information border management authority high risk area foreign combatant transiting border n regular information sharing taken place relevant security sector institution basis planning ensure appropriate support ddr objective n adequate mechanism place ensure institutional memory avoid reliance key individual assessment report key document retained easily accessible order support lesson learned process ddrssr", "ProcessedSent": "n mechanism support national dialogue coordination across ddr ssr", "SentID": 10870 }, { "ParagraphID": 3068, - "Paragraph": "Communication and coordination Coordination \\n Have opportunities been taken to engage with national security sector management and oversight bodies on how they can support the DDR process? \\n Is there a mechanism that supports national dialogue and coordination across DDR and SSR? If not, could the national commission on DDR fulfil this role by inviting representatives of other ministries to selected meetings? \\n Are the specific objectives of DDR and SSR clearly set out and understood (e.g. in a \u2018letter of commitment\u2019)? Is this understanding shared by national actors and interna- tional partners as the basis for a mutually supportive approach? \\n\\n Knowledge management \\n When developing information management systems, are efforts made to also collect data that will be useful for SSR? Is there a mechanism in place to share this data? \\n Is there provision for up to date conflict and security analysis as a common basis for DDR\/SSR decision-making? \\n Have efforts been made to share information with border management authorities on high risk areas for foreign combatants transiting borders? \\n Has regular information sharing taken place with relevant security sector institutions as a basis for planning to ensure appropriate support to DDR objectives? \\n Are adequate mechanisms in place to ensure institutional memory and avoid over reliance on key individuals? Are assessment reports and other key documents retained and easily accessible in order to support lessons learned processes for DDR\/SSR?", + "Paragraph": "Communication and coordination Coordination \n Have opportunities been taken to engage with national security sector management and oversight bodies on how they can support the DDR process? \n Is there a mechanism that supports national dialogue and coordination across DDR and SSR? If not, could the national commission on DDR fulfil this role by inviting representatives of other ministries to selected meetings? \n Are the specific objectives of DDR and SSR clearly set out and understood (e.g. in a \u2018letter of commitment\u2019)? Is this understanding shared by national actors and interna- tional partners as the basis for a mutually supportive approach? \n\n Knowledge management \n When developing information management systems, are efforts made to also collect data that will be useful for SSR? Is there a mechanism in place to share this data? \n Is there provision for up to date conflict and security analysis as a common basis for DDR\/SSR decision-making? \n Have efforts been made to share information with border management authorities on high risk areas for foreign combatants transiting borders? \n Has regular information sharing taken place with relevant security sector institutions as a basis for planning to ensure appropriate support to DDR objectives? \n Are adequate mechanisms in place to ensure institutional memory and avoid over reliance on key individuals? Are assessment reports and other key documents retained and easily accessible in order to support lessons learned processes for DDR\/SSR?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195697,9 +195697,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3068, - "Paragraph": "Communication and coordination Coordination \\n Have opportunities been taken to engage with national security sector management and oversight bodies on how they can support the DDR process? \\n Is there a mechanism that supports national dialogue and coordination across DDR and SSR? If not, could the national commission on DDR fulfil this role by inviting representatives of other ministries to selected meetings? \\n Are the specific objectives of DDR and SSR clearly set out and understood (e.g. in a \u2018letter of commitment\u2019)? Is this understanding shared by national actors and interna- tional partners as the basis for a mutually supportive approach? \\n\\n Knowledge management \\n When developing information management systems, are efforts made to also collect data that will be useful for SSR? Is there a mechanism in place to share this data? \\n Is there provision for up to date conflict and security analysis as a common basis for DDR\/SSR decision-making? \\n Have efforts been made to share information with border management authorities on high risk areas for foreign combatants transiting borders? \\n Has regular information sharing taken place with relevant security sector institutions as a basis for planning to ensure appropriate support to DDR objectives? \\n Are adequate mechanisms in place to ensure institutional memory and avoid over reliance on key individuals? Are assessment reports and other key documents retained and easily accessible in order to support lessons learned processes for DDR\/SSR?", + "Paragraph": "Communication and coordination Coordination \n Have opportunities been taken to engage with national security sector management and oversight bodies on how they can support the DDR process? \n Is there a mechanism that supports national dialogue and coordination across DDR and SSR? If not, could the national commission on DDR fulfil this role by inviting representatives of other ministries to selected meetings? \n Are the specific objectives of DDR and SSR clearly set out and understood (e.g. in a \u2018letter of commitment\u2019)? Is this understanding shared by national actors and interna- tional partners as the basis for a mutually supportive approach? \n\n Knowledge management \n When developing information management systems, are efforts made to also collect data that will be useful for SSR? Is there a mechanism in place to share this data? \n Is there provision for up to date conflict and security analysis as a common basis for DDR\/SSR decision-making? \n Have efforts been made to share information with border management authorities on high risk areas for foreign combatants transiting borders? \n Has regular information sharing taken place with relevant security sector institutions as a basis for planning to ensure appropriate support to DDR objectives? \n Are adequate mechanisms in place to ensure institutional memory and avoid over reliance on key individuals? Are assessment reports and other key documents retained and easily accessible in order to support lessons learned processes for DDR\/SSR?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195708,16 +195708,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.3. Communication and coordination", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Are the specific objectives of DDR and SSR clearly set out and understood (e.g.", + "Sentence": "\n Are the specific objectives of DDR and SSR clearly set out and understood (e.g.", "newParagraph": "communication coordination coordination n opportunity taken engage national security sector management oversight body support ddr process n mechanism support national dialogue coordination across ddr ssr could national commission ddr fulfil role inviting representative ministry selected meeting n specific objective ddr ssr clearly set understood eg letter commitment understanding shared national actor interna tional partner basis mutually supportive approach nn knowledge management n developing information management system effort made also collect data useful ssr mechanism place share data n provision date conflict security analysis common basis ddrssr decisionmaking n effort made share information border management authority high risk area foreign combatant transiting border n regular information sharing taken place relevant security sector institution basis planning ensure appropriate support ddr objective n adequate mechanism place ensure institutional memory avoid reliance key individual assessment report key document retained easily accessible order support lesson learned process ddrssr", "ProcessedSent": "n specific objective ddr ssr clearly set understood eg", "SentID": 10872 }, { "ParagraphID": 3068, - "Paragraph": "Communication and coordination Coordination \\n Have opportunities been taken to engage with national security sector management and oversight bodies on how they can support the DDR process? \\n Is there a mechanism that supports national dialogue and coordination across DDR and SSR? If not, could the national commission on DDR fulfil this role by inviting representatives of other ministries to selected meetings? \\n Are the specific objectives of DDR and SSR clearly set out and understood (e.g. in a \u2018letter of commitment\u2019)? Is this understanding shared by national actors and interna- tional partners as the basis for a mutually supportive approach? \\n\\n Knowledge management \\n When developing information management systems, are efforts made to also collect data that will be useful for SSR? Is there a mechanism in place to share this data? \\n Is there provision for up to date conflict and security analysis as a common basis for DDR\/SSR decision-making? \\n Have efforts been made to share information with border management authorities on high risk areas for foreign combatants transiting borders? \\n Has regular information sharing taken place with relevant security sector institutions as a basis for planning to ensure appropriate support to DDR objectives? \\n Are adequate mechanisms in place to ensure institutional memory and avoid over reliance on key individuals? Are assessment reports and other key documents retained and easily accessible in order to support lessons learned processes for DDR\/SSR?", + "Paragraph": "Communication and coordination Coordination \n Have opportunities been taken to engage with national security sector management and oversight bodies on how they can support the DDR process? \n Is there a mechanism that supports national dialogue and coordination across DDR and SSR? If not, could the national commission on DDR fulfil this role by inviting representatives of other ministries to selected meetings? \n Are the specific objectives of DDR and SSR clearly set out and understood (e.g. in a \u2018letter of commitment\u2019)? Is this understanding shared by national actors and interna- tional partners as the basis for a mutually supportive approach? \n\n Knowledge management \n When developing information management systems, are efforts made to also collect data that will be useful for SSR? Is there a mechanism in place to share this data? \n Is there provision for up to date conflict and security analysis as a common basis for DDR\/SSR decision-making? \n Have efforts been made to share information with border management authorities on high risk areas for foreign combatants transiting borders? \n Has regular information sharing taken place with relevant security sector institutions as a basis for planning to ensure appropriate support to DDR objectives? \n Are adequate mechanisms in place to ensure institutional memory and avoid over reliance on key individuals? Are assessment reports and other key documents retained and easily accessible in order to support lessons learned processes for DDR\/SSR?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195733,9 +195733,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3068, - "Paragraph": "Communication and coordination Coordination \\n Have opportunities been taken to engage with national security sector management and oversight bodies on how they can support the DDR process? \\n Is there a mechanism that supports national dialogue and coordination across DDR and SSR? If not, could the national commission on DDR fulfil this role by inviting representatives of other ministries to selected meetings? \\n Are the specific objectives of DDR and SSR clearly set out and understood (e.g. in a \u2018letter of commitment\u2019)? Is this understanding shared by national actors and interna- tional partners as the basis for a mutually supportive approach? \\n\\n Knowledge management \\n When developing information management systems, are efforts made to also collect data that will be useful for SSR? Is there a mechanism in place to share this data? \\n Is there provision for up to date conflict and security analysis as a common basis for DDR\/SSR decision-making? \\n Have efforts been made to share information with border management authorities on high risk areas for foreign combatants transiting borders? \\n Has regular information sharing taken place with relevant security sector institutions as a basis for planning to ensure appropriate support to DDR objectives? \\n Are adequate mechanisms in place to ensure institutional memory and avoid over reliance on key individuals? Are assessment reports and other key documents retained and easily accessible in order to support lessons learned processes for DDR\/SSR?", + "Paragraph": "Communication and coordination Coordination \n Have opportunities been taken to engage with national security sector management and oversight bodies on how they can support the DDR process? \n Is there a mechanism that supports national dialogue and coordination across DDR and SSR? If not, could the national commission on DDR fulfil this role by inviting representatives of other ministries to selected meetings? \n Are the specific objectives of DDR and SSR clearly set out and understood (e.g. in a \u2018letter of commitment\u2019)? Is this understanding shared by national actors and interna- tional partners as the basis for a mutually supportive approach? \n\n Knowledge management \n When developing information management systems, are efforts made to also collect data that will be useful for SSR? Is there a mechanism in place to share this data? \n Is there provision for up to date conflict and security analysis as a common basis for DDR\/SSR decision-making? \n Have efforts been made to share information with border management authorities on high risk areas for foreign combatants transiting borders? \n Has regular information sharing taken place with relevant security sector institutions as a basis for planning to ensure appropriate support to DDR objectives? \n Are adequate mechanisms in place to ensure institutional memory and avoid over reliance on key individuals? Are assessment reports and other key documents retained and easily accessible in order to support lessons learned processes for DDR\/SSR?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195751,9 +195751,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3068, - "Paragraph": "Communication and coordination Coordination \\n Have opportunities been taken to engage with national security sector management and oversight bodies on how they can support the DDR process? \\n Is there a mechanism that supports national dialogue and coordination across DDR and SSR? If not, could the national commission on DDR fulfil this role by inviting representatives of other ministries to selected meetings? \\n Are the specific objectives of DDR and SSR clearly set out and understood (e.g. in a \u2018letter of commitment\u2019)? Is this understanding shared by national actors and interna- tional partners as the basis for a mutually supportive approach? \\n\\n Knowledge management \\n When developing information management systems, are efforts made to also collect data that will be useful for SSR? Is there a mechanism in place to share this data? \\n Is there provision for up to date conflict and security analysis as a common basis for DDR\/SSR decision-making? \\n Have efforts been made to share information with border management authorities on high risk areas for foreign combatants transiting borders? \\n Has regular information sharing taken place with relevant security sector institutions as a basis for planning to ensure appropriate support to DDR objectives? \\n Are adequate mechanisms in place to ensure institutional memory and avoid over reliance on key individuals? Are assessment reports and other key documents retained and easily accessible in order to support lessons learned processes for DDR\/SSR?", + "Paragraph": "Communication and coordination Coordination \n Have opportunities been taken to engage with national security sector management and oversight bodies on how they can support the DDR process? \n Is there a mechanism that supports national dialogue and coordination across DDR and SSR? If not, could the national commission on DDR fulfil this role by inviting representatives of other ministries to selected meetings? \n Are the specific objectives of DDR and SSR clearly set out and understood (e.g. in a \u2018letter of commitment\u2019)? Is this understanding shared by national actors and interna- tional partners as the basis for a mutually supportive approach? \n\n Knowledge management \n When developing information management systems, are efforts made to also collect data that will be useful for SSR? Is there a mechanism in place to share this data? \n Is there provision for up to date conflict and security analysis as a common basis for DDR\/SSR decision-making? \n Have efforts been made to share information with border management authorities on high risk areas for foreign combatants transiting borders? \n Has regular information sharing taken place with relevant security sector institutions as a basis for planning to ensure appropriate support to DDR objectives? \n Are adequate mechanisms in place to ensure institutional memory and avoid over reliance on key individuals? Are assessment reports and other key documents retained and easily accessible in order to support lessons learned processes for DDR\/SSR?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195762,16 +195762,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.3. Communication and coordination", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Knowledge management \\n When developing information management systems, are efforts made to also collect data that will be useful for SSR?", + "Sentence": "\n\n Knowledge management \n When developing information management systems, are efforts made to also collect data that will be useful for SSR?", "newParagraph": "communication coordination coordination n opportunity taken engage national security sector management oversight body support ddr process n mechanism support national dialogue coordination across ddr ssr could national commission ddr fulfil role inviting representative ministry selected meeting n specific objective ddr ssr clearly set understood eg letter commitment understanding shared national actor interna tional partner basis mutually supportive approach nn knowledge management n developing information management system effort made also collect data useful ssr mechanism place share data n provision date conflict security analysis common basis ddrssr decisionmaking n effort made share information border management authority high risk area foreign combatant transiting border n regular information sharing taken place relevant security sector institution basis planning ensure appropriate support ddr objective n adequate mechanism place ensure institutional memory avoid reliance key individual assessment report key document retained easily accessible order support lesson learned process ddrssr", "ProcessedSent": "nn knowledge management n developing information management system effort made also collect data useful ssr", "SentID": 10875 }, { "ParagraphID": 3068, - "Paragraph": "Communication and coordination Coordination \\n Have opportunities been taken to engage with national security sector management and oversight bodies on how they can support the DDR process? \\n Is there a mechanism that supports national dialogue and coordination across DDR and SSR? If not, could the national commission on DDR fulfil this role by inviting representatives of other ministries to selected meetings? \\n Are the specific objectives of DDR and SSR clearly set out and understood (e.g. in a \u2018letter of commitment\u2019)? Is this understanding shared by national actors and interna- tional partners as the basis for a mutually supportive approach? \\n\\n Knowledge management \\n When developing information management systems, are efforts made to also collect data that will be useful for SSR? Is there a mechanism in place to share this data? \\n Is there provision for up to date conflict and security analysis as a common basis for DDR\/SSR decision-making? \\n Have efforts been made to share information with border management authorities on high risk areas for foreign combatants transiting borders? \\n Has regular information sharing taken place with relevant security sector institutions as a basis for planning to ensure appropriate support to DDR objectives? \\n Are adequate mechanisms in place to ensure institutional memory and avoid over reliance on key individuals? Are assessment reports and other key documents retained and easily accessible in order to support lessons learned processes for DDR\/SSR?", + "Paragraph": "Communication and coordination Coordination \n Have opportunities been taken to engage with national security sector management and oversight bodies on how they can support the DDR process? \n Is there a mechanism that supports national dialogue and coordination across DDR and SSR? If not, could the national commission on DDR fulfil this role by inviting representatives of other ministries to selected meetings? \n Are the specific objectives of DDR and SSR clearly set out and understood (e.g. in a \u2018letter of commitment\u2019)? Is this understanding shared by national actors and interna- tional partners as the basis for a mutually supportive approach? \n\n Knowledge management \n When developing information management systems, are efforts made to also collect data that will be useful for SSR? Is there a mechanism in place to share this data? \n Is there provision for up to date conflict and security analysis as a common basis for DDR\/SSR decision-making? \n Have efforts been made to share information with border management authorities on high risk areas for foreign combatants transiting borders? \n Has regular information sharing taken place with relevant security sector institutions as a basis for planning to ensure appropriate support to DDR objectives? \n Are adequate mechanisms in place to ensure institutional memory and avoid over reliance on key individuals? Are assessment reports and other key documents retained and easily accessible in order to support lessons learned processes for DDR\/SSR?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195787,9 +195787,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3068, - "Paragraph": "Communication and coordination Coordination \\n Have opportunities been taken to engage with national security sector management and oversight bodies on how they can support the DDR process? \\n Is there a mechanism that supports national dialogue and coordination across DDR and SSR? If not, could the national commission on DDR fulfil this role by inviting representatives of other ministries to selected meetings? \\n Are the specific objectives of DDR and SSR clearly set out and understood (e.g. in a \u2018letter of commitment\u2019)? Is this understanding shared by national actors and interna- tional partners as the basis for a mutually supportive approach? \\n\\n Knowledge management \\n When developing information management systems, are efforts made to also collect data that will be useful for SSR? Is there a mechanism in place to share this data? \\n Is there provision for up to date conflict and security analysis as a common basis for DDR\/SSR decision-making? \\n Have efforts been made to share information with border management authorities on high risk areas for foreign combatants transiting borders? \\n Has regular information sharing taken place with relevant security sector institutions as a basis for planning to ensure appropriate support to DDR objectives? \\n Are adequate mechanisms in place to ensure institutional memory and avoid over reliance on key individuals? Are assessment reports and other key documents retained and easily accessible in order to support lessons learned processes for DDR\/SSR?", + "Paragraph": "Communication and coordination Coordination \n Have opportunities been taken to engage with national security sector management and oversight bodies on how they can support the DDR process? \n Is there a mechanism that supports national dialogue and coordination across DDR and SSR? If not, could the national commission on DDR fulfil this role by inviting representatives of other ministries to selected meetings? \n Are the specific objectives of DDR and SSR clearly set out and understood (e.g. in a \u2018letter of commitment\u2019)? Is this understanding shared by national actors and interna- tional partners as the basis for a mutually supportive approach? \n\n Knowledge management \n When developing information management systems, are efforts made to also collect data that will be useful for SSR? Is there a mechanism in place to share this data? \n Is there provision for up to date conflict and security analysis as a common basis for DDR\/SSR decision-making? \n Have efforts been made to share information with border management authorities on high risk areas for foreign combatants transiting borders? \n Has regular information sharing taken place with relevant security sector institutions as a basis for planning to ensure appropriate support to DDR objectives? \n Are adequate mechanisms in place to ensure institutional memory and avoid over reliance on key individuals? Are assessment reports and other key documents retained and easily accessible in order to support lessons learned processes for DDR\/SSR?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195798,16 +195798,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.3. Communication and coordination", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Is there provision for up to date conflict and security analysis as a common basis for DDR\/SSR decision-making?", + "Sentence": "\n Is there provision for up to date conflict and security analysis as a common basis for DDR\/SSR decision-making?", "newParagraph": "communication coordination coordination n opportunity taken engage national security sector management oversight body support ddr process n mechanism support national dialogue coordination across ddr ssr could national commission ddr fulfil role inviting representative ministry selected meeting n specific objective ddr ssr clearly set understood eg letter commitment understanding shared national actor interna tional partner basis mutually supportive approach nn knowledge management n developing information management system effort made also collect data useful ssr mechanism place share data n provision date conflict security analysis common basis ddrssr decisionmaking n effort made share information border management authority high risk area foreign combatant transiting border n regular information sharing taken place relevant security sector institution basis planning ensure appropriate support ddr objective n adequate mechanism place ensure institutional memory avoid reliance key individual assessment report key document retained easily accessible order support lesson learned process ddrssr", "ProcessedSent": "n provision date conflict security analysis common basis ddrssr decisionmaking", "SentID": 10877 }, { "ParagraphID": 3068, - "Paragraph": "Communication and coordination Coordination \\n Have opportunities been taken to engage with national security sector management and oversight bodies on how they can support the DDR process? \\n Is there a mechanism that supports national dialogue and coordination across DDR and SSR? If not, could the national commission on DDR fulfil this role by inviting representatives of other ministries to selected meetings? \\n Are the specific objectives of DDR and SSR clearly set out and understood (e.g. in a \u2018letter of commitment\u2019)? Is this understanding shared by national actors and interna- tional partners as the basis for a mutually supportive approach? \\n\\n Knowledge management \\n When developing information management systems, are efforts made to also collect data that will be useful for SSR? Is there a mechanism in place to share this data? \\n Is there provision for up to date conflict and security analysis as a common basis for DDR\/SSR decision-making? \\n Have efforts been made to share information with border management authorities on high risk areas for foreign combatants transiting borders? \\n Has regular information sharing taken place with relevant security sector institutions as a basis for planning to ensure appropriate support to DDR objectives? \\n Are adequate mechanisms in place to ensure institutional memory and avoid over reliance on key individuals? Are assessment reports and other key documents retained and easily accessible in order to support lessons learned processes for DDR\/SSR?", + "Paragraph": "Communication and coordination Coordination \n Have opportunities been taken to engage with national security sector management and oversight bodies on how they can support the DDR process? \n Is there a mechanism that supports national dialogue and coordination across DDR and SSR? If not, could the national commission on DDR fulfil this role by inviting representatives of other ministries to selected meetings? \n Are the specific objectives of DDR and SSR clearly set out and understood (e.g. in a \u2018letter of commitment\u2019)? Is this understanding shared by national actors and interna- tional partners as the basis for a mutually supportive approach? \n\n Knowledge management \n When developing information management systems, are efforts made to also collect data that will be useful for SSR? Is there a mechanism in place to share this data? \n Is there provision for up to date conflict and security analysis as a common basis for DDR\/SSR decision-making? \n Have efforts been made to share information with border management authorities on high risk areas for foreign combatants transiting borders? \n Has regular information sharing taken place with relevant security sector institutions as a basis for planning to ensure appropriate support to DDR objectives? \n Are adequate mechanisms in place to ensure institutional memory and avoid over reliance on key individuals? Are assessment reports and other key documents retained and easily accessible in order to support lessons learned processes for DDR\/SSR?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195816,16 +195816,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.3. Communication and coordination", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Have efforts been made to share information with border management authorities on high risk areas for foreign combatants transiting borders?", + "Sentence": "\n Have efforts been made to share information with border management authorities on high risk areas for foreign combatants transiting borders?", "newParagraph": "communication coordination coordination n opportunity taken engage national security sector management oversight body support ddr process n mechanism support national dialogue coordination across ddr ssr could national commission ddr fulfil role inviting representative ministry selected meeting n specific objective ddr ssr clearly set understood eg letter commitment understanding shared national actor interna tional partner basis mutually supportive approach nn knowledge management n developing information management system effort made also collect data useful ssr mechanism place share data n provision date conflict security analysis common basis ddrssr decisionmaking n effort made share information border management authority high risk area foreign combatant transiting border n regular information sharing taken place relevant security sector institution basis planning ensure appropriate support ddr objective n adequate mechanism place ensure institutional memory avoid reliance key individual assessment report key document retained easily accessible order support lesson learned process ddrssr", "ProcessedSent": "n effort made share information border management authority high risk area foreign combatant transiting border", "SentID": 10878 }, { "ParagraphID": 3068, - "Paragraph": "Communication and coordination Coordination \\n Have opportunities been taken to engage with national security sector management and oversight bodies on how they can support the DDR process? \\n Is there a mechanism that supports national dialogue and coordination across DDR and SSR? If not, could the national commission on DDR fulfil this role by inviting representatives of other ministries to selected meetings? \\n Are the specific objectives of DDR and SSR clearly set out and understood (e.g. in a \u2018letter of commitment\u2019)? Is this understanding shared by national actors and interna- tional partners as the basis for a mutually supportive approach? \\n\\n Knowledge management \\n When developing information management systems, are efforts made to also collect data that will be useful for SSR? Is there a mechanism in place to share this data? \\n Is there provision for up to date conflict and security analysis as a common basis for DDR\/SSR decision-making? \\n Have efforts been made to share information with border management authorities on high risk areas for foreign combatants transiting borders? \\n Has regular information sharing taken place with relevant security sector institutions as a basis for planning to ensure appropriate support to DDR objectives? \\n Are adequate mechanisms in place to ensure institutional memory and avoid over reliance on key individuals? Are assessment reports and other key documents retained and easily accessible in order to support lessons learned processes for DDR\/SSR?", + "Paragraph": "Communication and coordination Coordination \n Have opportunities been taken to engage with national security sector management and oversight bodies on how they can support the DDR process? \n Is there a mechanism that supports national dialogue and coordination across DDR and SSR? If not, could the national commission on DDR fulfil this role by inviting representatives of other ministries to selected meetings? \n Are the specific objectives of DDR and SSR clearly set out and understood (e.g. in a \u2018letter of commitment\u2019)? Is this understanding shared by national actors and interna- tional partners as the basis for a mutually supportive approach? \n\n Knowledge management \n When developing information management systems, are efforts made to also collect data that will be useful for SSR? Is there a mechanism in place to share this data? \n Is there provision for up to date conflict and security analysis as a common basis for DDR\/SSR decision-making? \n Have efforts been made to share information with border management authorities on high risk areas for foreign combatants transiting borders? \n Has regular information sharing taken place with relevant security sector institutions as a basis for planning to ensure appropriate support to DDR objectives? \n Are adequate mechanisms in place to ensure institutional memory and avoid over reliance on key individuals? Are assessment reports and other key documents retained and easily accessible in order to support lessons learned processes for DDR\/SSR?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195834,16 +195834,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.3. Communication and coordination", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Has regular information sharing taken place with relevant security sector institutions as a basis for planning to ensure appropriate support to DDR objectives?", + "Sentence": "\n Has regular information sharing taken place with relevant security sector institutions as a basis for planning to ensure appropriate support to DDR objectives?", "newParagraph": "communication coordination coordination n opportunity taken engage national security sector management oversight body support ddr process n mechanism support national dialogue coordination across ddr ssr could national commission ddr fulfil role inviting representative ministry selected meeting n specific objective ddr ssr clearly set understood eg letter commitment understanding shared national actor interna tional partner basis mutually supportive approach nn knowledge management n developing information management system effort made also collect data useful ssr mechanism place share data n provision date conflict security analysis common basis ddrssr decisionmaking n effort made share information border management authority high risk area foreign combatant transiting border n regular information sharing taken place relevant security sector institution basis planning ensure appropriate support ddr objective n adequate mechanism place ensure institutional memory avoid reliance key individual assessment report key document retained easily accessible order support lesson learned process ddrssr", "ProcessedSent": "n regular information sharing taken place relevant security sector institution basis planning ensure appropriate support ddr objective", "SentID": 10879 }, { "ParagraphID": 3068, - "Paragraph": "Communication and coordination Coordination \\n Have opportunities been taken to engage with national security sector management and oversight bodies on how they can support the DDR process? \\n Is there a mechanism that supports national dialogue and coordination across DDR and SSR? If not, could the national commission on DDR fulfil this role by inviting representatives of other ministries to selected meetings? \\n Are the specific objectives of DDR and SSR clearly set out and understood (e.g. in a \u2018letter of commitment\u2019)? Is this understanding shared by national actors and interna- tional partners as the basis for a mutually supportive approach? \\n\\n Knowledge management \\n When developing information management systems, are efforts made to also collect data that will be useful for SSR? Is there a mechanism in place to share this data? \\n Is there provision for up to date conflict and security analysis as a common basis for DDR\/SSR decision-making? \\n Have efforts been made to share information with border management authorities on high risk areas for foreign combatants transiting borders? \\n Has regular information sharing taken place with relevant security sector institutions as a basis for planning to ensure appropriate support to DDR objectives? \\n Are adequate mechanisms in place to ensure institutional memory and avoid over reliance on key individuals? Are assessment reports and other key documents retained and easily accessible in order to support lessons learned processes for DDR\/SSR?", + "Paragraph": "Communication and coordination Coordination \n Have opportunities been taken to engage with national security sector management and oversight bodies on how they can support the DDR process? \n Is there a mechanism that supports national dialogue and coordination across DDR and SSR? If not, could the national commission on DDR fulfil this role by inviting representatives of other ministries to selected meetings? \n Are the specific objectives of DDR and SSR clearly set out and understood (e.g. in a \u2018letter of commitment\u2019)? Is this understanding shared by national actors and interna- tional partners as the basis for a mutually supportive approach? \n\n Knowledge management \n When developing information management systems, are efforts made to also collect data that will be useful for SSR? Is there a mechanism in place to share this data? \n Is there provision for up to date conflict and security analysis as a common basis for DDR\/SSR decision-making? \n Have efforts been made to share information with border management authorities on high risk areas for foreign combatants transiting borders? \n Has regular information sharing taken place with relevant security sector institutions as a basis for planning to ensure appropriate support to DDR objectives? \n Are adequate mechanisms in place to ensure institutional memory and avoid over reliance on key individuals? Are assessment reports and other key documents retained and easily accessible in order to support lessons learned processes for DDR\/SSR?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195852,16 +195852,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.3. Communication and coordination", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Are adequate mechanisms in place to ensure institutional memory and avoid over reliance on key individuals?", + "Sentence": "\n Are adequate mechanisms in place to ensure institutional memory and avoid over reliance on key individuals?", "newParagraph": "communication coordination coordination n opportunity taken engage national security sector management oversight body support ddr process n mechanism support national dialogue coordination across ddr ssr could national commission ddr fulfil role inviting representative ministry selected meeting n specific objective ddr ssr clearly set understood eg letter commitment understanding shared national actor interna tional partner basis mutually supportive approach nn knowledge management n developing information management system effort made also collect data useful ssr mechanism place share data n provision date conflict security analysis common basis ddrssr decisionmaking n effort made share information border management authority high risk area foreign combatant transiting border n regular information sharing taken place relevant security sector institution basis planning ensure appropriate support ddr objective n adequate mechanism place ensure institutional memory avoid reliance key individual assessment report key document retained easily accessible order support lesson learned process ddrssr", "ProcessedSent": "n adequate mechanism place ensure institutional memory avoid reliance key individual", "SentID": 10880 }, { "ParagraphID": 3068, - "Paragraph": "Communication and coordination Coordination \\n Have opportunities been taken to engage with national security sector management and oversight bodies on how they can support the DDR process? \\n Is there a mechanism that supports national dialogue and coordination across DDR and SSR? If not, could the national commission on DDR fulfil this role by inviting representatives of other ministries to selected meetings? \\n Are the specific objectives of DDR and SSR clearly set out and understood (e.g. in a \u2018letter of commitment\u2019)? Is this understanding shared by national actors and interna- tional partners as the basis for a mutually supportive approach? \\n\\n Knowledge management \\n When developing information management systems, are efforts made to also collect data that will be useful for SSR? Is there a mechanism in place to share this data? \\n Is there provision for up to date conflict and security analysis as a common basis for DDR\/SSR decision-making? \\n Have efforts been made to share information with border management authorities on high risk areas for foreign combatants transiting borders? \\n Has regular information sharing taken place with relevant security sector institutions as a basis for planning to ensure appropriate support to DDR objectives? \\n Are adequate mechanisms in place to ensure institutional memory and avoid over reliance on key individuals? Are assessment reports and other key documents retained and easily accessible in order to support lessons learned processes for DDR\/SSR?", + "Paragraph": "Communication and coordination Coordination \n Have opportunities been taken to engage with national security sector management and oversight bodies on how they can support the DDR process? \n Is there a mechanism that supports national dialogue and coordination across DDR and SSR? If not, could the national commission on DDR fulfil this role by inviting representatives of other ministries to selected meetings? \n Are the specific objectives of DDR and SSR clearly set out and understood (e.g. in a \u2018letter of commitment\u2019)? Is this understanding shared by national actors and interna- tional partners as the basis for a mutually supportive approach? \n\n Knowledge management \n When developing information management systems, are efforts made to also collect data that will be useful for SSR? Is there a mechanism in place to share this data? \n Is there provision for up to date conflict and security analysis as a common basis for DDR\/SSR decision-making? \n Have efforts been made to share information with border management authorities on high risk areas for foreign combatants transiting borders? \n Has regular information sharing taken place with relevant security sector institutions as a basis for planning to ensure appropriate support to DDR objectives? \n Are adequate mechanisms in place to ensure institutional memory and avoid over reliance on key individuals? Are assessment reports and other key documents retained and easily accessible in order to support lessons learned processes for DDR\/SSR?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195877,9 +195877,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3069, - "Paragraph": "Funding \\n Does resource planning seek to identify gaps, increase coherence and mitigate compe- tition between DDR and SSR? \\n Have the financial resource implications of DDR for the security sector been considered, and vice versa? \\n Are DDR and SSR programmes realistic and compatible with national budgets?", + "Paragraph": "Funding \n Does resource planning seek to identify gaps, increase coherence and mitigate compe- tition between DDR and SSR? \n Have the financial resource implications of DDR for the security sector been considered, and vice versa? \n Are DDR and SSR programmes realistic and compatible with national budgets?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195888,16 +195888,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.4. Funding", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Funding \\n Does resource planning seek to identify gaps, increase coherence and mitigate compe- tition between DDR and SSR?", + "Sentence": "Funding \n Does resource planning seek to identify gaps, increase coherence and mitigate compe- tition between DDR and SSR?", "newParagraph": "funding n resource planning seek identify gap increase coherence mitigate compe tition ddr ssr n financial resource implication ddr security sector considered vice versa n ddr ssr programme realistic compatible national budget", "ProcessedSent": "funding n resource planning seek identify gap increase coherence mitigate compe tition ddr ssr", "SentID": 10882 }, { "ParagraphID": 3069, - "Paragraph": "Funding \\n Does resource planning seek to identify gaps, increase coherence and mitigate compe- tition between DDR and SSR? \\n Have the financial resource implications of DDR for the security sector been considered, and vice versa? \\n Are DDR and SSR programmes realistic and compatible with national budgets?", + "Paragraph": "Funding \n Does resource planning seek to identify gaps, increase coherence and mitigate compe- tition between DDR and SSR? \n Have the financial resource implications of DDR for the security sector been considered, and vice versa? \n Are DDR and SSR programmes realistic and compatible with national budgets?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195906,16 +195906,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.4. Funding", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Have the financial resource implications of DDR for the security sector been considered, and vice versa?", + "Sentence": "\n Have the financial resource implications of DDR for the security sector been considered, and vice versa?", "newParagraph": "funding n resource planning seek identify gap increase coherence mitigate compe tition ddr ssr n financial resource implication ddr security sector considered vice versa n ddr ssr programme realistic compatible national budget", "ProcessedSent": "n financial resource implication ddr security sector considered vice versa", "SentID": 10883 }, { "ParagraphID": 3069, - "Paragraph": "Funding \\n Does resource planning seek to identify gaps, increase coherence and mitigate compe- tition between DDR and SSR? \\n Have the financial resource implications of DDR for the security sector been considered, and vice versa? \\n Are DDR and SSR programmes realistic and compatible with national budgets?", + "Paragraph": "Funding \n Does resource planning seek to identify gaps, increase coherence and mitigate compe- tition between DDR and SSR? \n Have the financial resource implications of DDR for the security sector been considered, and vice versa? \n Are DDR and SSR programmes realistic and compatible with national budgets?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195924,16 +195924,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.4. Funding", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Are DDR and SSR programmes realistic and compatible with national budgets?", + "Sentence": "\n Are DDR and SSR programmes realistic and compatible with national budgets?", "newParagraph": "funding n resource planning seek identify gap increase coherence mitigate compe tition ddr ssr n financial resource implication ddr security sector considered vice versa n ddr ssr programme realistic compatible national budget", "ProcessedSent": "n ddr ssr programme realistic compatible national budget", "SentID": 10884 }, { "ParagraphID": 3070, - "Paragraph": "Capacity development, pooling resources and training H\\n ave efforts been made to sensitise staff on the DDR\/SSR nexus through training or other activities? \\n Has the need for personnel to link DDR and SSR concerns been clearly agreed at Head- quarters and included in the ToRs of relevant personnel? \\n Has cross-participation in DDR or SSR training been implemented to foster knowledge transfer and build relationships? \\n Have key skills sets been identified and provision made for the availability of a multi- disciplinary resource pool? Are linguistic and \u2018knowledge transfer\u2019 skills adequately represented in order to support national capacity development? \\n In the area of national capacity-building, has the development of cross-cutting skills such as human resources and financial management (common requirements for both DDR and SSR) been encouraged? \\n Has pooling financial and physical resources for DDR and SSR been considered, for example, in the area of community security initiatives or SALW initiatives? \\n Are UN personnel aware of available SSR Resources, including through the UN Inter- Agency SSR Task Force (e.g. policy guidance, resources, gap analysis, backstopping)?", + "Paragraph": "Capacity development, pooling resources and training H\n ave efforts been made to sensitise staff on the DDR\/SSR nexus through training or other activities? \n Has the need for personnel to link DDR and SSR concerns been clearly agreed at Head- quarters and included in the ToRs of relevant personnel? \n Has cross-participation in DDR or SSR training been implemented to foster knowledge transfer and build relationships? \n Have key skills sets been identified and provision made for the availability of a multi- disciplinary resource pool? Are linguistic and \u2018knowledge transfer\u2019 skills adequately represented in order to support national capacity development? \n In the area of national capacity-building, has the development of cross-cutting skills such as human resources and financial management (common requirements for both DDR and SSR) been encouraged? \n Has pooling financial and physical resources for DDR and SSR been considered, for example, in the area of community security initiatives or SALW initiatives? \n Are UN personnel aware of available SSR Resources, including through the UN Inter- Agency SSR Task Force (e.g. policy guidance, resources, gap analysis, backstopping)?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195942,16 +195942,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.5. Capacity development, pooling resources and training", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Capacity development, pooling resources and training H\\n ave efforts been made to sensitise staff on the DDR\/SSR nexus through training or other activities?", + "Sentence": "Capacity development, pooling resources and training H\n ave efforts been made to sensitise staff on the DDR\/SSR nexus through training or other activities?", "newParagraph": "capacity development pooling resource training hn ave effort made sensitise staff ddrssr nexus training activity n need personnel link ddr ssr concern clearly agreed head quarter included tor relevant personnel n crossparticipation ddr ssr training implemented foster knowledge transfer build relationship n key skill set identified provision made availability multi disciplinary resource pool linguistic knowledge transfer skill adequately represented order support national capacity development n area national capacitybuilding development crosscutting skill human resource financial management common requirement ddr ssr encouraged n pooling financial physical resource ddr ssr considered example area community security initiative salw initiative n un personnel aware available ssr resource including un inter agency ssr task force eg policy guidance resource gap analysis backstopping", "ProcessedSent": "capacity development pooling resource training hn ave effort made sensitise staff ddrssr nexus training activity", "SentID": 10885 }, { "ParagraphID": 3070, - "Paragraph": "Capacity development, pooling resources and training H\\n ave efforts been made to sensitise staff on the DDR\/SSR nexus through training or other activities? \\n Has the need for personnel to link DDR and SSR concerns been clearly agreed at Head- quarters and included in the ToRs of relevant personnel? \\n Has cross-participation in DDR or SSR training been implemented to foster knowledge transfer and build relationships? \\n Have key skills sets been identified and provision made for the availability of a multi- disciplinary resource pool? Are linguistic and \u2018knowledge transfer\u2019 skills adequately represented in order to support national capacity development? \\n In the area of national capacity-building, has the development of cross-cutting skills such as human resources and financial management (common requirements for both DDR and SSR) been encouraged? \\n Has pooling financial and physical resources for DDR and SSR been considered, for example, in the area of community security initiatives or SALW initiatives? \\n Are UN personnel aware of available SSR Resources, including through the UN Inter- Agency SSR Task Force (e.g. policy guidance, resources, gap analysis, backstopping)?", + "Paragraph": "Capacity development, pooling resources and training H\n ave efforts been made to sensitise staff on the DDR\/SSR nexus through training or other activities? \n Has the need for personnel to link DDR and SSR concerns been clearly agreed at Head- quarters and included in the ToRs of relevant personnel? \n Has cross-participation in DDR or SSR training been implemented to foster knowledge transfer and build relationships? \n Have key skills sets been identified and provision made for the availability of a multi- disciplinary resource pool? Are linguistic and \u2018knowledge transfer\u2019 skills adequately represented in order to support national capacity development? \n In the area of national capacity-building, has the development of cross-cutting skills such as human resources and financial management (common requirements for both DDR and SSR) been encouraged? \n Has pooling financial and physical resources for DDR and SSR been considered, for example, in the area of community security initiatives or SALW initiatives? \n Are UN personnel aware of available SSR Resources, including through the UN Inter- Agency SSR Task Force (e.g. policy guidance, resources, gap analysis, backstopping)?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195960,16 +195960,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.5. Capacity development, pooling resources and training", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Has the need for personnel to link DDR and SSR concerns been clearly agreed at Head- quarters and included in the ToRs of relevant personnel?", + "Sentence": "\n Has the need for personnel to link DDR and SSR concerns been clearly agreed at Head- quarters and included in the ToRs of relevant personnel?", "newParagraph": "capacity development pooling resource training hn ave effort made sensitise staff ddrssr nexus training activity n need personnel link ddr ssr concern clearly agreed head quarter included tor relevant personnel n crossparticipation ddr ssr training implemented foster knowledge transfer build relationship n key skill set identified provision made availability multi disciplinary resource pool linguistic knowledge transfer skill adequately represented order support national capacity development n area national capacitybuilding development crosscutting skill human resource financial management common requirement ddr ssr encouraged n pooling financial physical resource ddr ssr considered example area community security initiative salw initiative n un personnel aware available ssr resource including un inter agency ssr task force eg policy guidance resource gap analysis backstopping", "ProcessedSent": "n need personnel link ddr ssr concern clearly agreed head quarter included tor relevant personnel", "SentID": 10886 }, { "ParagraphID": 3070, - "Paragraph": "Capacity development, pooling resources and training H\\n ave efforts been made to sensitise staff on the DDR\/SSR nexus through training or other activities? \\n Has the need for personnel to link DDR and SSR concerns been clearly agreed at Head- quarters and included in the ToRs of relevant personnel? \\n Has cross-participation in DDR or SSR training been implemented to foster knowledge transfer and build relationships? \\n Have key skills sets been identified and provision made for the availability of a multi- disciplinary resource pool? Are linguistic and \u2018knowledge transfer\u2019 skills adequately represented in order to support national capacity development? \\n In the area of national capacity-building, has the development of cross-cutting skills such as human resources and financial management (common requirements for both DDR and SSR) been encouraged? \\n Has pooling financial and physical resources for DDR and SSR been considered, for example, in the area of community security initiatives or SALW initiatives? \\n Are UN personnel aware of available SSR Resources, including through the UN Inter- Agency SSR Task Force (e.g. policy guidance, resources, gap analysis, backstopping)?", + "Paragraph": "Capacity development, pooling resources and training H\n ave efforts been made to sensitise staff on the DDR\/SSR nexus through training or other activities? \n Has the need for personnel to link DDR and SSR concerns been clearly agreed at Head- quarters and included in the ToRs of relevant personnel? \n Has cross-participation in DDR or SSR training been implemented to foster knowledge transfer and build relationships? \n Have key skills sets been identified and provision made for the availability of a multi- disciplinary resource pool? Are linguistic and \u2018knowledge transfer\u2019 skills adequately represented in order to support national capacity development? \n In the area of national capacity-building, has the development of cross-cutting skills such as human resources and financial management (common requirements for both DDR and SSR) been encouraged? \n Has pooling financial and physical resources for DDR and SSR been considered, for example, in the area of community security initiatives or SALW initiatives? \n Are UN personnel aware of available SSR Resources, including through the UN Inter- Agency SSR Task Force (e.g. policy guidance, resources, gap analysis, backstopping)?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195978,16 +195978,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.5. Capacity development, pooling resources and training", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Has cross-participation in DDR or SSR training been implemented to foster knowledge transfer and build relationships?", + "Sentence": "\n Has cross-participation in DDR or SSR training been implemented to foster knowledge transfer and build relationships?", "newParagraph": "capacity development pooling resource training hn ave effort made sensitise staff ddrssr nexus training activity n need personnel link ddr ssr concern clearly agreed head quarter included tor relevant personnel n crossparticipation ddr ssr training implemented foster knowledge transfer build relationship n key skill set identified provision made availability multi disciplinary resource pool linguistic knowledge transfer skill adequately represented order support national capacity development n area national capacitybuilding development crosscutting skill human resource financial management common requirement ddr ssr encouraged n pooling financial physical resource ddr ssr considered example area community security initiative salw initiative n un personnel aware available ssr resource including un inter agency ssr task force eg policy guidance resource gap analysis backstopping", "ProcessedSent": "n crossparticipation ddr ssr training implemented foster knowledge transfer build relationship", "SentID": 10887 }, { "ParagraphID": 3070, - "Paragraph": "Capacity development, pooling resources and training H\\n ave efforts been made to sensitise staff on the DDR\/SSR nexus through training or other activities? \\n Has the need for personnel to link DDR and SSR concerns been clearly agreed at Head- quarters and included in the ToRs of relevant personnel? \\n Has cross-participation in DDR or SSR training been implemented to foster knowledge transfer and build relationships? \\n Have key skills sets been identified and provision made for the availability of a multi- disciplinary resource pool? Are linguistic and \u2018knowledge transfer\u2019 skills adequately represented in order to support national capacity development? \\n In the area of national capacity-building, has the development of cross-cutting skills such as human resources and financial management (common requirements for both DDR and SSR) been encouraged? \\n Has pooling financial and physical resources for DDR and SSR been considered, for example, in the area of community security initiatives or SALW initiatives? \\n Are UN personnel aware of available SSR Resources, including through the UN Inter- Agency SSR Task Force (e.g. policy guidance, resources, gap analysis, backstopping)?", + "Paragraph": "Capacity development, pooling resources and training H\n ave efforts been made to sensitise staff on the DDR\/SSR nexus through training or other activities? \n Has the need for personnel to link DDR and SSR concerns been clearly agreed at Head- quarters and included in the ToRs of relevant personnel? \n Has cross-participation in DDR or SSR training been implemented to foster knowledge transfer and build relationships? \n Have key skills sets been identified and provision made for the availability of a multi- disciplinary resource pool? Are linguistic and \u2018knowledge transfer\u2019 skills adequately represented in order to support national capacity development? \n In the area of national capacity-building, has the development of cross-cutting skills such as human resources and financial management (common requirements for both DDR and SSR) been encouraged? \n Has pooling financial and physical resources for DDR and SSR been considered, for example, in the area of community security initiatives or SALW initiatives? \n Are UN personnel aware of available SSR Resources, including through the UN Inter- Agency SSR Task Force (e.g. policy guidance, resources, gap analysis, backstopping)?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -195996,16 +195996,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.5. Capacity development, pooling resources and training", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Have key skills sets been identified and provision made for the availability of a multi- disciplinary resource pool?", + "Sentence": "\n Have key skills sets been identified and provision made for the availability of a multi- disciplinary resource pool?", "newParagraph": "capacity development pooling resource training hn ave effort made sensitise staff ddrssr nexus training activity n need personnel link ddr ssr concern clearly agreed head quarter included tor relevant personnel n crossparticipation ddr ssr training implemented foster knowledge transfer build relationship n key skill set identified provision made availability multi disciplinary resource pool linguistic knowledge transfer skill adequately represented order support national capacity development n area national capacitybuilding development crosscutting skill human resource financial management common requirement ddr ssr encouraged n pooling financial physical resource ddr ssr considered example area community security initiative salw initiative n un personnel aware available ssr resource including un inter agency ssr task force eg policy guidance resource gap analysis backstopping", "ProcessedSent": "n key skill set identified provision made availability multi disciplinary resource pool", "SentID": 10888 }, { "ParagraphID": 3070, - "Paragraph": "Capacity development, pooling resources and training H\\n ave efforts been made to sensitise staff on the DDR\/SSR nexus through training or other activities? \\n Has the need for personnel to link DDR and SSR concerns been clearly agreed at Head- quarters and included in the ToRs of relevant personnel? \\n Has cross-participation in DDR or SSR training been implemented to foster knowledge transfer and build relationships? \\n Have key skills sets been identified and provision made for the availability of a multi- disciplinary resource pool? Are linguistic and \u2018knowledge transfer\u2019 skills adequately represented in order to support national capacity development? \\n In the area of national capacity-building, has the development of cross-cutting skills such as human resources and financial management (common requirements for both DDR and SSR) been encouraged? \\n Has pooling financial and physical resources for DDR and SSR been considered, for example, in the area of community security initiatives or SALW initiatives? \\n Are UN personnel aware of available SSR Resources, including through the UN Inter- Agency SSR Task Force (e.g. policy guidance, resources, gap analysis, backstopping)?", + "Paragraph": "Capacity development, pooling resources and training H\n ave efforts been made to sensitise staff on the DDR\/SSR nexus through training or other activities? \n Has the need for personnel to link DDR and SSR concerns been clearly agreed at Head- quarters and included in the ToRs of relevant personnel? \n Has cross-participation in DDR or SSR training been implemented to foster knowledge transfer and build relationships? \n Have key skills sets been identified and provision made for the availability of a multi- disciplinary resource pool? Are linguistic and \u2018knowledge transfer\u2019 skills adequately represented in order to support national capacity development? \n In the area of national capacity-building, has the development of cross-cutting skills such as human resources and financial management (common requirements for both DDR and SSR) been encouraged? \n Has pooling financial and physical resources for DDR and SSR been considered, for example, in the area of community security initiatives or SALW initiatives? \n Are UN personnel aware of available SSR Resources, including through the UN Inter- Agency SSR Task Force (e.g. policy guidance, resources, gap analysis, backstopping)?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196021,9 +196021,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3070, - "Paragraph": "Capacity development, pooling resources and training H\\n ave efforts been made to sensitise staff on the DDR\/SSR nexus through training or other activities? \\n Has the need for personnel to link DDR and SSR concerns been clearly agreed at Head- quarters and included in the ToRs of relevant personnel? \\n Has cross-participation in DDR or SSR training been implemented to foster knowledge transfer and build relationships? \\n Have key skills sets been identified and provision made for the availability of a multi- disciplinary resource pool? Are linguistic and \u2018knowledge transfer\u2019 skills adequately represented in order to support national capacity development? \\n In the area of national capacity-building, has the development of cross-cutting skills such as human resources and financial management (common requirements for both DDR and SSR) been encouraged? \\n Has pooling financial and physical resources for DDR and SSR been considered, for example, in the area of community security initiatives or SALW initiatives? \\n Are UN personnel aware of available SSR Resources, including through the UN Inter- Agency SSR Task Force (e.g. policy guidance, resources, gap analysis, backstopping)?", + "Paragraph": "Capacity development, pooling resources and training H\n ave efforts been made to sensitise staff on the DDR\/SSR nexus through training or other activities? \n Has the need for personnel to link DDR and SSR concerns been clearly agreed at Head- quarters and included in the ToRs of relevant personnel? \n Has cross-participation in DDR or SSR training been implemented to foster knowledge transfer and build relationships? \n Have key skills sets been identified and provision made for the availability of a multi- disciplinary resource pool? Are linguistic and \u2018knowledge transfer\u2019 skills adequately represented in order to support national capacity development? \n In the area of national capacity-building, has the development of cross-cutting skills such as human resources and financial management (common requirements for both DDR and SSR) been encouraged? \n Has pooling financial and physical resources for DDR and SSR been considered, for example, in the area of community security initiatives or SALW initiatives? \n Are UN personnel aware of available SSR Resources, including through the UN Inter- Agency SSR Task Force (e.g. policy guidance, resources, gap analysis, backstopping)?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196032,16 +196032,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.5. Capacity development, pooling resources and training", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n In the area of national capacity-building, has the development of cross-cutting skills such as human resources and financial management (common requirements for both DDR and SSR) been encouraged?", + "Sentence": "\n In the area of national capacity-building, has the development of cross-cutting skills such as human resources and financial management (common requirements for both DDR and SSR) been encouraged?", "newParagraph": "capacity development pooling resource training hn ave effort made sensitise staff ddrssr nexus training activity n need personnel link ddr ssr concern clearly agreed head quarter included tor relevant personnel n crossparticipation ddr ssr training implemented foster knowledge transfer build relationship n key skill set identified provision made availability multi disciplinary resource pool linguistic knowledge transfer skill adequately represented order support national capacity development n area national capacitybuilding development crosscutting skill human resource financial management common requirement ddr ssr encouraged n pooling financial physical resource ddr ssr considered example area community security initiative salw initiative n un personnel aware available ssr resource including un inter agency ssr task force eg policy guidance resource gap analysis backstopping", "ProcessedSent": "n area national capacitybuilding development crosscutting skill human resource financial management common requirement ddr ssr encouraged", "SentID": 10890 }, { "ParagraphID": 3070, - "Paragraph": "Capacity development, pooling resources and training H\\n ave efforts been made to sensitise staff on the DDR\/SSR nexus through training or other activities? \\n Has the need for personnel to link DDR and SSR concerns been clearly agreed at Head- quarters and included in the ToRs of relevant personnel? \\n Has cross-participation in DDR or SSR training been implemented to foster knowledge transfer and build relationships? \\n Have key skills sets been identified and provision made for the availability of a multi- disciplinary resource pool? Are linguistic and \u2018knowledge transfer\u2019 skills adequately represented in order to support national capacity development? \\n In the area of national capacity-building, has the development of cross-cutting skills such as human resources and financial management (common requirements for both DDR and SSR) been encouraged? \\n Has pooling financial and physical resources for DDR and SSR been considered, for example, in the area of community security initiatives or SALW initiatives? \\n Are UN personnel aware of available SSR Resources, including through the UN Inter- Agency SSR Task Force (e.g. policy guidance, resources, gap analysis, backstopping)?", + "Paragraph": "Capacity development, pooling resources and training H\n ave efforts been made to sensitise staff on the DDR\/SSR nexus through training or other activities? \n Has the need for personnel to link DDR and SSR concerns been clearly agreed at Head- quarters and included in the ToRs of relevant personnel? \n Has cross-participation in DDR or SSR training been implemented to foster knowledge transfer and build relationships? \n Have key skills sets been identified and provision made for the availability of a multi- disciplinary resource pool? Are linguistic and \u2018knowledge transfer\u2019 skills adequately represented in order to support national capacity development? \n In the area of national capacity-building, has the development of cross-cutting skills such as human resources and financial management (common requirements for both DDR and SSR) been encouraged? \n Has pooling financial and physical resources for DDR and SSR been considered, for example, in the area of community security initiatives or SALW initiatives? \n Are UN personnel aware of available SSR Resources, including through the UN Inter- Agency SSR Task Force (e.g. policy guidance, resources, gap analysis, backstopping)?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196050,16 +196050,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.5. Capacity development, pooling resources and training", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Has pooling financial and physical resources for DDR and SSR been considered, for example, in the area of community security initiatives or SALW initiatives?", + "Sentence": "\n Has pooling financial and physical resources for DDR and SSR been considered, for example, in the area of community security initiatives or SALW initiatives?", "newParagraph": "capacity development pooling resource training hn ave effort made sensitise staff ddrssr nexus training activity n need personnel link ddr ssr concern clearly agreed head quarter included tor relevant personnel n crossparticipation ddr ssr training implemented foster knowledge transfer build relationship n key skill set identified provision made availability multi disciplinary resource pool linguistic knowledge transfer skill adequately represented order support national capacity development n area national capacitybuilding development crosscutting skill human resource financial management common requirement ddr ssr encouraged n pooling financial physical resource ddr ssr considered example area community security initiative salw initiative n un personnel aware available ssr resource including un inter agency ssr task force eg policy guidance resource gap analysis backstopping", "ProcessedSent": "n pooling financial physical resource ddr ssr considered example area community security initiative salw initiative", "SentID": 10891 }, { "ParagraphID": 3070, - "Paragraph": "Capacity development, pooling resources and training H\\n ave efforts been made to sensitise staff on the DDR\/SSR nexus through training or other activities? \\n Has the need for personnel to link DDR and SSR concerns been clearly agreed at Head- quarters and included in the ToRs of relevant personnel? \\n Has cross-participation in DDR or SSR training been implemented to foster knowledge transfer and build relationships? \\n Have key skills sets been identified and provision made for the availability of a multi- disciplinary resource pool? Are linguistic and \u2018knowledge transfer\u2019 skills adequately represented in order to support national capacity development? \\n In the area of national capacity-building, has the development of cross-cutting skills such as human resources and financial management (common requirements for both DDR and SSR) been encouraged? \\n Has pooling financial and physical resources for DDR and SSR been considered, for example, in the area of community security initiatives or SALW initiatives? \\n Are UN personnel aware of available SSR Resources, including through the UN Inter- Agency SSR Task Force (e.g. policy guidance, resources, gap analysis, backstopping)?", + "Paragraph": "Capacity development, pooling resources and training H\n ave efforts been made to sensitise staff on the DDR\/SSR nexus through training or other activities? \n Has the need for personnel to link DDR and SSR concerns been clearly agreed at Head- quarters and included in the ToRs of relevant personnel? \n Has cross-participation in DDR or SSR training been implemented to foster knowledge transfer and build relationships? \n Have key skills sets been identified and provision made for the availability of a multi- disciplinary resource pool? Are linguistic and \u2018knowledge transfer\u2019 skills adequately represented in order to support national capacity development? \n In the area of national capacity-building, has the development of cross-cutting skills such as human resources and financial management (common requirements for both DDR and SSR) been encouraged? \n Has pooling financial and physical resources for DDR and SSR been considered, for example, in the area of community security initiatives or SALW initiatives? \n Are UN personnel aware of available SSR Resources, including through the UN Inter- Agency SSR Task Force (e.g. policy guidance, resources, gap analysis, backstopping)?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196068,16 +196068,16 @@ "Heading2": "11.5. Capacity development, pooling resources and training", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Are UN personnel aware of available SSR Resources, including through the UN Inter- Agency SSR Task Force (e.g.", + "Sentence": "\n Are UN personnel aware of available SSR Resources, including through the UN Inter- Agency SSR Task Force (e.g.", "newParagraph": "capacity development pooling resource training hn ave effort made sensitise staff ddrssr nexus training activity n need personnel link ddr ssr concern clearly agreed head quarter included tor relevant personnel n crossparticipation ddr ssr training implemented foster knowledge transfer build relationship n key skill set identified provision made availability multi disciplinary resource pool linguistic knowledge transfer skill adequately represented order support national capacity development n area national capacitybuilding development crosscutting skill human resource financial management common requirement ddr ssr encouraged n pooling financial physical resource ddr ssr considered example area community security initiative salw initiative n un personnel aware available ssr resource including un inter agency ssr task force eg policy guidance resource gap analysis backstopping", "ProcessedSent": "n un personnel aware available ssr resource including un inter agency ssr task force eg", "SentID": 10892 }, { "ParagraphID": 3070, - "Paragraph": "Capacity development, pooling resources and training H\\n ave efforts been made to sensitise staff on the DDR\/SSR nexus through training or other activities? \\n Has the need for personnel to link DDR and SSR concerns been clearly agreed at Head- quarters and included in the ToRs of relevant personnel? \\n Has cross-participation in DDR or SSR training been implemented to foster knowledge transfer and build relationships? \\n Have key skills sets been identified and provision made for the availability of a multi- disciplinary resource pool? Are linguistic and \u2018knowledge transfer\u2019 skills adequately represented in order to support national capacity development? \\n In the area of national capacity-building, has the development of cross-cutting skills such as human resources and financial management (common requirements for both DDR and SSR) been encouraged? \\n Has pooling financial and physical resources for DDR and SSR been considered, for example, in the area of community security initiatives or SALW initiatives? \\n Are UN personnel aware of available SSR Resources, including through the UN Inter- Agency SSR Task Force (e.g. policy guidance, resources, gap analysis, backstopping)?", + "Paragraph": "Capacity development, pooling resources and training H\n ave efforts been made to sensitise staff on the DDR\/SSR nexus through training or other activities? \n Has the need for personnel to link DDR and SSR concerns been clearly agreed at Head- quarters and included in the ToRs of relevant personnel? \n Has cross-participation in DDR or SSR training been implemented to foster knowledge transfer and build relationships? \n Have key skills sets been identified and provision made for the availability of a multi- disciplinary resource pool? Are linguistic and \u2018knowledge transfer\u2019 skills adequately represented in order to support national capacity development? \n In the area of national capacity-building, has the development of cross-cutting skills such as human resources and financial management (common requirements for both DDR and SSR) been encouraged? \n Has pooling financial and physical resources for DDR and SSR been considered, for example, in the area of community security initiatives or SALW initiatives? \n Are UN personnel aware of available SSR Resources, including through the UN Inter- Agency SSR Task Force (e.g. policy guidance, resources, gap analysis, backstopping)?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196093,9 +196093,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3071, - "Paragraph": "Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies\u201d (2004) \\n The Secretary-General\u2019s Report \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d defines the rule of law as \u201ca principle of governance in which all persons, institutions and entities, public and private, including the State itself, are account- able to laws that are publicly promulgated, equally enforced and independently adjudicated, and which are consistent with international human rights norms and standards\u201d.18 DDR is identified as one key element of \u201ctransitioning out of conflict and back to normalcy.\u201d ", + "Paragraph": "Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies\u201d (2004) \n The Secretary-General\u2019s Report \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d defines the rule of law as \u201ca principle of governance in which all persons, institutions and entities, public and private, including the State itself, are account- able to laws that are publicly promulgated, equally enforced and independently adjudicated, and which are consistent with international human rights norms and standards\u201d.18 DDR is identified as one key element of \u201ctransitioning out of conflict and back to normalcy.\u201d ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196104,16 +196104,16 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies\u201d (2004) \\n The Secretary-General\u2019s Report \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d defines the rule of law as \u201ca principle of governance in which all persons, institutions and entities, public and private, including the State itself, are account- able to laws that are publicly promulgated, equally enforced and independently adjudicated, and which are consistent with international human rights norms and standards\u201d.18 DDR is identified as one key element of \u201ctransitioning out of conflict and back to normalcy.\u201d", + "Sentence": "Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies\u201d (2004) \n The Secretary-General\u2019s Report \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d defines the rule of law as \u201ca principle of governance in which all persons, institutions and entities, public and private, including the State itself, are account- able to laws that are publicly promulgated, equally enforced and independently adjudicated, and which are consistent with international human rights norms and standards\u201d.18 DDR is identified as one key element of \u201ctransitioning out of conflict and back to normalcy.\u201d", "newParagraph": "report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society 2004 n secretarygeneral report rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society defines rule law principle governance person institution entity public private including state account able law publicly promulgated equally enforced independently adjudicated consistent international human right norm standard 18 ddr identified one key element transitioning conflict back normalcy ", "ProcessedSent": "report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society 2004 n secretarygeneral report rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society defines rule law principle governance person institution entity public private including state account able law publicly promulgated equally enforced independently adjudicated consistent international human right norm standard 18 ddr identified one key element transitioning conflict back normalcy ", "SentID": 10894 }, { "ParagraphID": 3072, - "Paragraph": "Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration\u201d (2006) \\n The Secretary-General\u2019s report on \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration\u201d dis- cusses the increased engagement of the United Nations in DDR from 2000-2005 in peace- keeping and non-peacekeeping contexts. Some important \u201clessons learned\u201d from this work include: 1) DDR cannot be implemented without coordinating with the wider peacebuild- ing and recovery process; 2) DDR work should continue beyond the life of a traditional peacekeeping operation thus national capacities must be developed to ensure sustainability; 3) a fragmented approach to DDR is counterproductive; and 4) DDR \u201cmust also be planned in close coordination with transitional processes to review and reform the rule of law and security sectors, as well as efforts to control and reduce small arms proliferation.\u201d19", + "Paragraph": "Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration\u201d (2006) \n The Secretary-General\u2019s report on \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration\u201d dis- cusses the increased engagement of the United Nations in DDR from 2000-2005 in peace- keeping and non-peacekeeping contexts. Some important \u201clessons learned\u201d from this work include: 1) DDR cannot be implemented without coordinating with the wider peacebuild- ing and recovery process; 2) DDR work should continue beyond the life of a traditional peacekeeping operation thus national capacities must be developed to ensure sustainability; 3) a fragmented approach to DDR is counterproductive; and 4) DDR \u201cmust also be planned in close coordination with transitional processes to review and reform the rule of law and security sectors, as well as efforts to control and reduce small arms proliferation.\u201d19", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196122,16 +196122,16 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration\u201d (2006) \\n The Secretary-General\u2019s report on \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration\u201d dis- cusses the increased engagement of the United Nations in DDR from 2000-2005 in peace- keeping and non-peacekeeping contexts.", + "Sentence": "Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration\u201d (2006) \n The Secretary-General\u2019s report on \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration\u201d dis- cusses the increased engagement of the United Nations in DDR from 2000-2005 in peace- keeping and non-peacekeeping contexts.", "newParagraph": "report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration 2006 n secretarygeneral report disarmament demobilization reintegration dis cuss increased engagement united nation ddr 20002005 peace keeping nonpeacekeeping context important lesson learned work include 1 ddr cannot implemented without coordinating wider peacebuild ing recovery process 2 ddr work continue beyond life traditional peacekeeping operation thus national capacity must developed ensure sustainability 3 fragmented approach ddr counterproductive 4 ddr must also planned close coordination transitional process review reform rule law security sector well effort control reduce small arm proliferation 19", "ProcessedSent": "report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration 2006 n secretarygeneral report disarmament demobilization reintegration dis cuss increased engagement united nation ddr 20002005 peace keeping nonpeacekeeping context", "SentID": 10895 }, { "ParagraphID": 3072, - "Paragraph": "Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration\u201d (2006) \\n The Secretary-General\u2019s report on \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration\u201d dis- cusses the increased engagement of the United Nations in DDR from 2000-2005 in peace- keeping and non-peacekeeping contexts. Some important \u201clessons learned\u201d from this work include: 1) DDR cannot be implemented without coordinating with the wider peacebuild- ing and recovery process; 2) DDR work should continue beyond the life of a traditional peacekeeping operation thus national capacities must be developed to ensure sustainability; 3) a fragmented approach to DDR is counterproductive; and 4) DDR \u201cmust also be planned in close coordination with transitional processes to review and reform the rule of law and security sectors, as well as efforts to control and reduce small arms proliferation.\u201d19", + "Paragraph": "Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration\u201d (2006) \n The Secretary-General\u2019s report on \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration\u201d dis- cusses the increased engagement of the United Nations in DDR from 2000-2005 in peace- keeping and non-peacekeeping contexts. Some important \u201clessons learned\u201d from this work include: 1) DDR cannot be implemented without coordinating with the wider peacebuild- ing and recovery process; 2) DDR work should continue beyond the life of a traditional peacekeeping operation thus national capacities must be developed to ensure sustainability; 3) a fragmented approach to DDR is counterproductive; and 4) DDR \u201cmust also be planned in close coordination with transitional processes to review and reform the rule of law and security sectors, as well as efforts to control and reduce small arms proliferation.\u201d19", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196147,9 +196147,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3073, - "Paragraph": "Presidential Statement on \u201cMaintenance of international peace and security: role of the Security Council in supporting security sector reform\u201d (21 February 2007) \\n The Presidential Statement of 21 February 2007 emphasises that \u201creforming the security sector in post-conflict environments is critical to the consolidation of peace and stability, promoting poverty reduction, rule of law and good governance, extending legitimate state authority, and preventing countries from relapsing into conflict.\u201d20 The importance of a \u201cprofessional\u201d and \u201caccountable\u201d security sector as well as an \u201cimpartial\u201d justice sector are critical to sustainable peace and development. The fundamental role of the United Nations in \u201cpromoting comprehensive, coherent, and co-ordinated international support to nationally- owned security sector reform programmes, implemented with the consent of the country concerned\u201d is stressed, as is the need for a balanced approach to SSR that considers institu- tional capacity, affordability and sustainability of SSR programmes. Inter-linkages between SSR and \u201ctransitional justice, disarmament, demobilization and repatriation, reintegration and rehabilitation of former combatants, small arms and light weapons control, as well as gender equality, children and armed conflict and human rights issues\u201d are emphasised.21", + "Paragraph": "Presidential Statement on \u201cMaintenance of international peace and security: role of the Security Council in supporting security sector reform\u201d (21 February 2007) \n The Presidential Statement of 21 February 2007 emphasises that \u201creforming the security sector in post-conflict environments is critical to the consolidation of peace and stability, promoting poverty reduction, rule of law and good governance, extending legitimate state authority, and preventing countries from relapsing into conflict.\u201d20 The importance of a \u201cprofessional\u201d and \u201caccountable\u201d security sector as well as an \u201cimpartial\u201d justice sector are critical to sustainable peace and development. The fundamental role of the United Nations in \u201cpromoting comprehensive, coherent, and co-ordinated international support to nationally- owned security sector reform programmes, implemented with the consent of the country concerned\u201d is stressed, as is the need for a balanced approach to SSR that considers institu- tional capacity, affordability and sustainability of SSR programmes. Inter-linkages between SSR and \u201ctransitional justice, disarmament, demobilization and repatriation, reintegration and rehabilitation of former combatants, small arms and light weapons control, as well as gender equality, children and armed conflict and human rights issues\u201d are emphasised.21", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196158,16 +196158,16 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Presidential Statement on \u201cMaintenance of international peace and security: role of the Security Council in supporting security sector reform\u201d (21 February 2007) \\n The Presidential Statement of 21 February 2007 emphasises that \u201creforming the security sector in post-conflict environments is critical to the consolidation of peace and stability, promoting poverty reduction, rule of law and good governance, extending legitimate state authority, and preventing countries from relapsing into conflict.\u201d20 The importance of a \u201cprofessional\u201d and \u201caccountable\u201d security sector as well as an \u201cimpartial\u201d justice sector are critical to sustainable peace and development.", + "Sentence": "Presidential Statement on \u201cMaintenance of international peace and security: role of the Security Council in supporting security sector reform\u201d (21 February 2007) \n The Presidential Statement of 21 February 2007 emphasises that \u201creforming the security sector in post-conflict environments is critical to the consolidation of peace and stability, promoting poverty reduction, rule of law and good governance, extending legitimate state authority, and preventing countries from relapsing into conflict.\u201d20 The importance of a \u201cprofessional\u201d and \u201caccountable\u201d security sector as well as an \u201cimpartial\u201d justice sector are critical to sustainable peace and development.", "newParagraph": "presidential statement maintenance international peace security role security council supporting security sector reform 21 february 2007 n presidential statement 21 february 2007 emphasis reforming security sector postconflict environment critical consolidation peace stability promoting poverty reduction rule law good governance extending legitimate state authority preventing country relapsing conflict 20 importance professional accountable security sector well impartial justice sector critical sustainable peace development fundamental role united nation promoting comprehensive coherent coordinated international support nationally owned security sector reform programme implemented consent country concerned stressed need balanced approach ssr considers institu tional capacity affordability sustainability ssr programme interlinkages ssr transitional justice disarmament demobilization repatriation reintegration rehabilitation former combatant small arm light weapon control well gender equality child armed conflict human right issue emphasised21", "ProcessedSent": "presidential statement maintenance international peace security role security council supporting security sector reform 21 february 2007 n presidential statement 21 february 2007 emphasis reforming security sector postconflict environment critical consolidation peace stability promoting poverty reduction rule law good governance extending legitimate state authority preventing country relapsing conflict 20 importance professional accountable security sector well impartial justice sector critical sustainable peace development", "SentID": 10897 }, { "ParagraphID": 3073, - "Paragraph": "Presidential Statement on \u201cMaintenance of international peace and security: role of the Security Council in supporting security sector reform\u201d (21 February 2007) \\n The Presidential Statement of 21 February 2007 emphasises that \u201creforming the security sector in post-conflict environments is critical to the consolidation of peace and stability, promoting poverty reduction, rule of law and good governance, extending legitimate state authority, and preventing countries from relapsing into conflict.\u201d20 The importance of a \u201cprofessional\u201d and \u201caccountable\u201d security sector as well as an \u201cimpartial\u201d justice sector are critical to sustainable peace and development. The fundamental role of the United Nations in \u201cpromoting comprehensive, coherent, and co-ordinated international support to nationally- owned security sector reform programmes, implemented with the consent of the country concerned\u201d is stressed, as is the need for a balanced approach to SSR that considers institu- tional capacity, affordability and sustainability of SSR programmes. Inter-linkages between SSR and \u201ctransitional justice, disarmament, demobilization and repatriation, reintegration and rehabilitation of former combatants, small arms and light weapons control, as well as gender equality, children and armed conflict and human rights issues\u201d are emphasised.21", + "Paragraph": "Presidential Statement on \u201cMaintenance of international peace and security: role of the Security Council in supporting security sector reform\u201d (21 February 2007) \n The Presidential Statement of 21 February 2007 emphasises that \u201creforming the security sector in post-conflict environments is critical to the consolidation of peace and stability, promoting poverty reduction, rule of law and good governance, extending legitimate state authority, and preventing countries from relapsing into conflict.\u201d20 The importance of a \u201cprofessional\u201d and \u201caccountable\u201d security sector as well as an \u201cimpartial\u201d justice sector are critical to sustainable peace and development. The fundamental role of the United Nations in \u201cpromoting comprehensive, coherent, and co-ordinated international support to nationally- owned security sector reform programmes, implemented with the consent of the country concerned\u201d is stressed, as is the need for a balanced approach to SSR that considers institu- tional capacity, affordability and sustainability of SSR programmes. Inter-linkages between SSR and \u201ctransitional justice, disarmament, demobilization and repatriation, reintegration and rehabilitation of former combatants, small arms and light weapons control, as well as gender equality, children and armed conflict and human rights issues\u201d are emphasised.21", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196183,9 +196183,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3073, - "Paragraph": "Presidential Statement on \u201cMaintenance of international peace and security: role of the Security Council in supporting security sector reform\u201d (21 February 2007) \\n The Presidential Statement of 21 February 2007 emphasises that \u201creforming the security sector in post-conflict environments is critical to the consolidation of peace and stability, promoting poverty reduction, rule of law and good governance, extending legitimate state authority, and preventing countries from relapsing into conflict.\u201d20 The importance of a \u201cprofessional\u201d and \u201caccountable\u201d security sector as well as an \u201cimpartial\u201d justice sector are critical to sustainable peace and development. The fundamental role of the United Nations in \u201cpromoting comprehensive, coherent, and co-ordinated international support to nationally- owned security sector reform programmes, implemented with the consent of the country concerned\u201d is stressed, as is the need for a balanced approach to SSR that considers institu- tional capacity, affordability and sustainability of SSR programmes. Inter-linkages between SSR and \u201ctransitional justice, disarmament, demobilization and repatriation, reintegration and rehabilitation of former combatants, small arms and light weapons control, as well as gender equality, children and armed conflict and human rights issues\u201d are emphasised.21", + "Paragraph": "Presidential Statement on \u201cMaintenance of international peace and security: role of the Security Council in supporting security sector reform\u201d (21 February 2007) \n The Presidential Statement of 21 February 2007 emphasises that \u201creforming the security sector in post-conflict environments is critical to the consolidation of peace and stability, promoting poverty reduction, rule of law and good governance, extending legitimate state authority, and preventing countries from relapsing into conflict.\u201d20 The importance of a \u201cprofessional\u201d and \u201caccountable\u201d security sector as well as an \u201cimpartial\u201d justice sector are critical to sustainable peace and development. The fundamental role of the United Nations in \u201cpromoting comprehensive, coherent, and co-ordinated international support to nationally- owned security sector reform programmes, implemented with the consent of the country concerned\u201d is stressed, as is the need for a balanced approach to SSR that considers institu- tional capacity, affordability and sustainability of SSR programmes. Inter-linkages between SSR and \u201ctransitional justice, disarmament, demobilization and repatriation, reintegration and rehabilitation of former combatants, small arms and light weapons control, as well as gender equality, children and armed conflict and human rights issues\u201d are emphasised.21", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196201,9 +196201,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3074, - "Paragraph": "Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform\u201d (2008) \\n The Secretary-General\u2019s report \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform\u201d, notes that \u201cthe development of effective and accountable security institutions on the basis of non-discrimination, full respect for human rights and the rule of law is essential\u201d.22 As part of a holistic strategy, the United Nations can play a normative as well as operational role in SSR. Normatively, the United Nations can \u201c[elaborate] policies and guidelines for the implementation of security sector reform plans and programmes and ensure that peacekeeping operations and United Nations country teams engaged in reform receive practical guidance and assistance in the estab- lishment of benchmarks and other evaluation processes\u201d.23 Operationally, the United Nations can: 1) provide a minimum level of security from which to launch SSR activities; 2) support needs assessments and strategic planning efforts; 3) facilitate dialogue among the many actors and stakeholders involved in a country\u2019s SSR process; 4) provide technical advice on defence and law enforcement institutions, border management, crime prevention and customs, among others; 5) coordinate and mobilize resources; 6) support the development of oversight mechanisms; and 7) support monitoring, evaluation and review efforts.24", + "Paragraph": "Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform\u201d (2008) \n The Secretary-General\u2019s report \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform\u201d, notes that \u201cthe development of effective and accountable security institutions on the basis of non-discrimination, full respect for human rights and the rule of law is essential\u201d.22 As part of a holistic strategy, the United Nations can play a normative as well as operational role in SSR. Normatively, the United Nations can \u201c[elaborate] policies and guidelines for the implementation of security sector reform plans and programmes and ensure that peacekeeping operations and United Nations country teams engaged in reform receive practical guidance and assistance in the estab- lishment of benchmarks and other evaluation processes\u201d.23 Operationally, the United Nations can: 1) provide a minimum level of security from which to launch SSR activities; 2) support needs assessments and strategic planning efforts; 3) facilitate dialogue among the many actors and stakeholders involved in a country\u2019s SSR process; 4) provide technical advice on defence and law enforcement institutions, border management, crime prevention and customs, among others; 5) coordinate and mobilize resources; 6) support the development of oversight mechanisms; and 7) support monitoring, evaluation and review efforts.24", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196212,16 +196212,16 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform\u201d (2008) \\n The Secretary-General\u2019s report \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform\u201d, notes that \u201cthe development of effective and accountable security institutions on the basis of non-discrimination, full respect for human rights and the rule of law is essential\u201d.22 As part of a holistic strategy, the United Nations can play a normative as well as operational role in SSR.", + "Sentence": "Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform\u201d (2008) \n The Secretary-General\u2019s report \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform\u201d, notes that \u201cthe development of effective and accountable security institutions on the basis of non-discrimination, full respect for human rights and the rule of law is essential\u201d.22 As part of a holistic strategy, the United Nations can play a normative as well as operational role in SSR.", "newParagraph": "report secretarygeneral securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform 2008 n secretarygeneral report securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform note development effective accountable security institution basis nondiscrimination full respect human right rule law essential 22 part holistic strategy united nation play normative well operational role ssr normatively united nation elaborate policy guideline implementation security sector reform plan programme ensure peacekeeping operation united nation country team engaged reform receive practical guidance assistance estab lishment benchmark evaluation process 23 operationally united nation 1 provide minimum level security launch ssr activity 2 support need assessment strategic planning effort 3 facilitate dialogue among many actor stakeholder involved country ssr process 4 provide technical advice defence law enforcement institution border management crime prevention custom among others 5 coordinate mobilize resource 6 support development oversight mechanism 7 support monitoring evaluation review efforts24", "ProcessedSent": "report secretarygeneral securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform 2008 n secretarygeneral report securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform note development effective accountable security institution basis nondiscrimination full respect human right rule law essential 22 part holistic strategy united nation play normative well operational role ssr", "SentID": 10900 }, { "ParagraphID": 3074, - "Paragraph": "Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform\u201d (2008) \\n The Secretary-General\u2019s report \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform\u201d, notes that \u201cthe development of effective and accountable security institutions on the basis of non-discrimination, full respect for human rights and the rule of law is essential\u201d.22 As part of a holistic strategy, the United Nations can play a normative as well as operational role in SSR. Normatively, the United Nations can \u201c[elaborate] policies and guidelines for the implementation of security sector reform plans and programmes and ensure that peacekeeping operations and United Nations country teams engaged in reform receive practical guidance and assistance in the estab- lishment of benchmarks and other evaluation processes\u201d.23 Operationally, the United Nations can: 1) provide a minimum level of security from which to launch SSR activities; 2) support needs assessments and strategic planning efforts; 3) facilitate dialogue among the many actors and stakeholders involved in a country\u2019s SSR process; 4) provide technical advice on defence and law enforcement institutions, border management, crime prevention and customs, among others; 5) coordinate and mobilize resources; 6) support the development of oversight mechanisms; and 7) support monitoring, evaluation and review efforts.24", + "Paragraph": "Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform\u201d (2008) \n The Secretary-General\u2019s report \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform\u201d, notes that \u201cthe development of effective and accountable security institutions on the basis of non-discrimination, full respect for human rights and the rule of law is essential\u201d.22 As part of a holistic strategy, the United Nations can play a normative as well as operational role in SSR. Normatively, the United Nations can \u201c[elaborate] policies and guidelines for the implementation of security sector reform plans and programmes and ensure that peacekeeping operations and United Nations country teams engaged in reform receive practical guidance and assistance in the estab- lishment of benchmarks and other evaluation processes\u201d.23 Operationally, the United Nations can: 1) provide a minimum level of security from which to launch SSR activities; 2) support needs assessments and strategic planning efforts; 3) facilitate dialogue among the many actors and stakeholders involved in a country\u2019s SSR process; 4) provide technical advice on defence and law enforcement institutions, border management, crime prevention and customs, among others; 5) coordinate and mobilize resources; 6) support the development of oversight mechanisms; and 7) support monitoring, evaluation and review efforts.24", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196237,9 +196237,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3075, - "Paragraph": "Presidential Statement on \u201cMaintenance of international peace and security: role of the Security Council in supporting security sector reform\u201d (12 May 2008) \\n The Presidential Statement of 12 May 2008 on supporting security sector reform highlights that SSR is a long-term process and that \u201cit is the sovereign right and primary responsibil- ity of the country concerned to determine its national approach and priorities for security sector reform\u201d.25 The statement also reiterates that a holistic and coherent UN approach is needed and underlines the important role the Peacebuilding Commission \u201ccan play in ensuring continuous international support to countries emerging from conflict.\u201d26", + "Paragraph": "Presidential Statement on \u201cMaintenance of international peace and security: role of the Security Council in supporting security sector reform\u201d (12 May 2008) \n The Presidential Statement of 12 May 2008 on supporting security sector reform highlights that SSR is a long-term process and that \u201cit is the sovereign right and primary responsibil- ity of the country concerned to determine its national approach and priorities for security sector reform\u201d.25 The statement also reiterates that a holistic and coherent UN approach is needed and underlines the important role the Peacebuilding Commission \u201ccan play in ensuring continuous international support to countries emerging from conflict.\u201d26", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196248,16 +196248,16 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Presidential Statement on \u201cMaintenance of international peace and security: role of the Security Council in supporting security sector reform\u201d (12 May 2008) \\n The Presidential Statement of 12 May 2008 on supporting security sector reform highlights that SSR is a long-term process and that \u201cit is the sovereign right and primary responsibil- ity of the country concerned to determine its national approach and priorities for security sector reform\u201d.25 The statement also reiterates that a holistic and coherent UN approach is needed and underlines the important role the Peacebuilding Commission \u201ccan play in ensuring continuous international support to countries emerging from conflict.\u201d26", + "Sentence": "Presidential Statement on \u201cMaintenance of international peace and security: role of the Security Council in supporting security sector reform\u201d (12 May 2008) \n The Presidential Statement of 12 May 2008 on supporting security sector reform highlights that SSR is a long-term process and that \u201cit is the sovereign right and primary responsibil- ity of the country concerned to determine its national approach and priorities for security sector reform\u201d.25 The statement also reiterates that a holistic and coherent UN approach is needed and underlines the important role the Peacebuilding Commission \u201ccan play in ensuring continuous international support to countries emerging from conflict.\u201d26", "newParagraph": "presidential statement maintenance international peace security role security council supporting security sector reform 12 may 2008 n presidential statement 12 may 2008 supporting security sector reform highlight ssr longterm process sovereign right primary responsibil ity country concerned determine national approach priority security sector reform 25 statement also reiterates holistic coherent un approach needed underline important role peacebuilding commission play ensuring continuous international support country emerging conflict 26", "ProcessedSent": "presidential statement maintenance international peace security role security council supporting security sector reform 12 may 2008 n presidential statement 12 may 2008 supporting security sector reform highlight ssr longterm process sovereign right primary responsibil ity country concerned determine national approach priority security sector reform 25 statement also reiterates holistic coherent un approach needed underline important role peacebuilding commission play ensuring continuous international support country emerging conflict 26", "SentID": 10902 }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196273,9 +196273,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196291,9 +196291,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196302,16 +196302,16 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008.", + "Sentence": "\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008.", "newParagraph": "1 box included throughout module provide practical example suggestion specific case study box draw four fieldbased case study conducted afghanistan burundi central african republic democratic republic congo support module n 2 see statement president security council 5632nd meeting security council held 20 february 2007 sprst20073 21 february 2007 statement president security council maintenance international peace security role security council humanitarian crisis challenge lesson learned way ahead sprst200530 12 july 2005 united nation report secretarygeneral securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform s200839 23 january 2008 united nation general assembly report special committee peacekeeping opera tions working group 2008 substantive session a6219 10 march 4 april 3 july 2008 n 3 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 4 state periodically review reform security sector recognising ssr postconflict challenge module focus context relevant ddr ssr concern n 5 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 6 organisation economic cooperation development security system reform gover nance dac reference document 2005 council european union eu concept esdp support security sector reform ssr council document 12566405 13 october 2005 com mission european community concept european community support security sector reform sec2006 658 24 may 2006 ecowas ecowas conflict prevention framework ecpf enacted regulation mscreg10108 mediation security council ecowas 16 january 2008 united nation security council annex letter dated 20 november 2007 permanent representative slovakia south africa united nation addressed secretarygeneral statement cochairs international work shop enhancing united nation support security sector reform africa towards african perspective s2007687 29 november 2007 n 7 practical guidance supporting parliamentary civil society oversight security sector see born h fluri p johnsson ed parliamentary oversight security sector dcaf interparliamentary union 2003 cole e eppert k kinzelback k ed public oversight security sector dcafundp 2008 n 8 muggah robert ed security postconflict reconstruction dealing fighter math war routledge 2009 n 9 h\u00e4nggi h scherrer v ed 2008 security sector reform un integrated mission experi ence burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo lit verlag m\u00fcnster n 10 oecd dac handbook security system reform supporting security justice provides extensive guidance political technical aspect ssr different phase programme cycle organization economic cooperation development oecd dac hand book security system reform supporting security justice 2007 httpwwwoecdorg dataoecd432538406485pdf n 11 recommended interim report group expert democratic republic congo pursuant security council resolution 1698 2006 s200740 n 12 see undp bcpr 2006 vetting public employee postconflict setting operational guideline n 13 bastick megan valasek kristin ed gender security sector reform toolkit dcaf osce odihr uninstraw 2008 available httpwwwdcafchgendersecuritysectorreform gssrtoolkitcfmnavsub137navsub23nav13 n 14 see greene owen simon rynn linking coordinating ddr ssr human security conflict issue experience priority centre international cooperation security safer world university bradford july 2008 n 15 recent study african security sector network assn provides valuable insight drawn analysis ssr peace agreement 8 state africa asia central america see annex b full detail n 16 see laurent banal vincenza scherrer onub importance local ownership case burundi security sector reform un integrated mission experience burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo ed h h\u00e4nggi v scherrer lit verlag 2008 n 17 un ssr resource may available un interagency taskforce ssr capacity includes guidance resource gap analysis backstopping field operation n 18 united nation report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society s2004616 23 august 2004 para 6 n 19 united nation report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration a60705 2 march 2006 para 9 n 20 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 21 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 22 report secretarygeneral securing peace development page 1 n 23 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 48 n 24 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 50 n 25 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008 n 26 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n 2 see statement president security council 5632nd meeting security council held 20 february 2007 sprst20073 21 february 2007 statement president security council maintenance international peace security role security council humanitarian crisis challenge lesson learned way ahead sprst200530 12 july 2005 united nation report secretarygeneral securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform s200839 23 january 2008 united nation general assembly report special committee peacekeeping opera tions working group 2008 substantive session a6219 10 march 4 april 3 july 2008", "SentID": 10905 }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196320,16 +196320,16 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17.", + "Sentence": "\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17.", "newParagraph": "1 box included throughout module provide practical example suggestion specific case study box draw four fieldbased case study conducted afghanistan burundi central african republic democratic republic congo support module n 2 see statement president security council 5632nd meeting security council held 20 february 2007 sprst20073 21 february 2007 statement president security council maintenance international peace security role security council humanitarian crisis challenge lesson learned way ahead sprst200530 12 july 2005 united nation report secretarygeneral securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform s200839 23 january 2008 united nation general assembly report special committee peacekeeping opera tions working group 2008 substantive session a6219 10 march 4 april 3 july 2008 n 3 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 4 state periodically review reform security sector recognising ssr postconflict challenge module focus context relevant ddr ssr concern n 5 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 6 organisation economic cooperation development security system reform gover nance dac reference document 2005 council european union eu concept esdp support security sector reform ssr council document 12566405 13 october 2005 com mission european community concept european community support security sector reform sec2006 658 24 may 2006 ecowas ecowas conflict prevention framework ecpf enacted regulation mscreg10108 mediation security council ecowas 16 january 2008 united nation security council annex letter dated 20 november 2007 permanent representative slovakia south africa united nation addressed secretarygeneral statement cochairs international work shop enhancing united nation support security sector reform africa towards african perspective s2007687 29 november 2007 n 7 practical guidance supporting parliamentary civil society oversight security sector see born h fluri p johnsson ed parliamentary oversight security sector dcaf interparliamentary union 2003 cole e eppert k kinzelback k ed public oversight security sector dcafundp 2008 n 8 muggah robert ed security postconflict reconstruction dealing fighter math war routledge 2009 n 9 h\u00e4nggi h scherrer v ed 2008 security sector reform un integrated mission experi ence burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo lit verlag m\u00fcnster n 10 oecd dac handbook security system reform supporting security justice provides extensive guidance political technical aspect ssr different phase programme cycle organization economic cooperation development oecd dac hand book security system reform supporting security justice 2007 httpwwwoecdorg dataoecd432538406485pdf n 11 recommended interim report group expert democratic republic congo pursuant security council resolution 1698 2006 s200740 n 12 see undp bcpr 2006 vetting public employee postconflict setting operational guideline n 13 bastick megan valasek kristin ed gender security sector reform toolkit dcaf osce odihr uninstraw 2008 available httpwwwdcafchgendersecuritysectorreform gssrtoolkitcfmnavsub137navsub23nav13 n 14 see greene owen simon rynn linking coordinating ddr ssr human security conflict issue experience priority centre international cooperation security safer world university bradford july 2008 n 15 recent study african security sector network assn provides valuable insight drawn analysis ssr peace agreement 8 state africa asia central america see annex b full detail n 16 see laurent banal vincenza scherrer onub importance local ownership case burundi security sector reform un integrated mission experience burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo ed h h\u00e4nggi v scherrer lit verlag 2008 n 17 un ssr resource may available un interagency taskforce ssr capacity includes guidance resource gap analysis backstopping field operation n 18 united nation report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society s2004616 23 august 2004 para 6 n 19 united nation report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration a60705 2 march 2006 para 9 n 20 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 21 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 22 report secretarygeneral securing peace development page 1 n 23 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 48 n 24 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 50 n 25 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008 n 26 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n 3 report secretary general securing peace development para 17", "SentID": 10906 }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196338,16 +196338,16 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors.", + "Sentence": "\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors.", "newParagraph": "1 box included throughout module provide practical example suggestion specific case study box draw four fieldbased case study conducted afghanistan burundi central african republic democratic republic congo support module n 2 see statement president security council 5632nd meeting security council held 20 february 2007 sprst20073 21 february 2007 statement president security council maintenance international peace security role security council humanitarian crisis challenge lesson learned way ahead sprst200530 12 july 2005 united nation report secretarygeneral securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform s200839 23 january 2008 united nation general assembly report special committee peacekeeping opera tions working group 2008 substantive session a6219 10 march 4 april 3 july 2008 n 3 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 4 state periodically review reform security sector recognising ssr postconflict challenge module focus context relevant ddr ssr concern n 5 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 6 organisation economic cooperation development security system reform gover nance dac reference document 2005 council european union eu concept esdp support security sector reform ssr council document 12566405 13 october 2005 com mission european community concept european community support security sector reform sec2006 658 24 may 2006 ecowas ecowas conflict prevention framework ecpf enacted regulation mscreg10108 mediation security council ecowas 16 january 2008 united nation security council annex letter dated 20 november 2007 permanent representative slovakia south africa united nation addressed secretarygeneral statement cochairs international work shop enhancing united nation support security sector reform africa towards african perspective s2007687 29 november 2007 n 7 practical guidance supporting parliamentary civil society oversight security sector see born h fluri p johnsson ed parliamentary oversight security sector dcaf interparliamentary union 2003 cole e eppert k kinzelback k ed public oversight security sector dcafundp 2008 n 8 muggah robert ed security postconflict reconstruction dealing fighter math war routledge 2009 n 9 h\u00e4nggi h scherrer v ed 2008 security sector reform un integrated mission experi ence burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo lit verlag m\u00fcnster n 10 oecd dac handbook security system reform supporting security justice provides extensive guidance political technical aspect ssr different phase programme cycle organization economic cooperation development oecd dac hand book security system reform supporting security justice 2007 httpwwwoecdorg dataoecd432538406485pdf n 11 recommended interim report group expert democratic republic congo pursuant security council resolution 1698 2006 s200740 n 12 see undp bcpr 2006 vetting public employee postconflict setting operational guideline n 13 bastick megan valasek kristin ed gender security sector reform toolkit dcaf osce odihr uninstraw 2008 available httpwwwdcafchgendersecuritysectorreform gssrtoolkitcfmnavsub137navsub23nav13 n 14 see greene owen simon rynn linking coordinating ddr ssr human security conflict issue experience priority centre international cooperation security safer world university bradford july 2008 n 15 recent study african security sector network assn provides valuable insight drawn analysis ssr peace agreement 8 state africa asia central america see annex b full detail n 16 see laurent banal vincenza scherrer onub importance local ownership case burundi security sector reform un integrated mission experience burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo ed h h\u00e4nggi v scherrer lit verlag 2008 n 17 un ssr resource may available un interagency taskforce ssr capacity includes guidance resource gap analysis backstopping field operation n 18 united nation report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society s2004616 23 august 2004 para 6 n 19 united nation report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration a60705 2 march 2006 para 9 n 20 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 21 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 22 report secretarygeneral securing peace development page 1 n 23 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 48 n 24 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 50 n 25 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008 n 26 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n 4 state periodically review reform security sector", "SentID": 10907 }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196363,9 +196363,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196374,16 +196374,16 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development.", + "Sentence": "\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development.", "newParagraph": "1 box included throughout module provide practical example suggestion specific case study box draw four fieldbased case study conducted afghanistan burundi central african republic democratic republic congo support module n 2 see statement president security council 5632nd meeting security council held 20 february 2007 sprst20073 21 february 2007 statement president security council maintenance international peace security role security council humanitarian crisis challenge lesson learned way ahead sprst200530 12 july 2005 united nation report secretarygeneral securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform s200839 23 january 2008 united nation general assembly report special committee peacekeeping opera tions working group 2008 substantive session a6219 10 march 4 april 3 july 2008 n 3 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 4 state periodically review reform security sector recognising ssr postconflict challenge module focus context relevant ddr ssr concern n 5 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 6 organisation economic cooperation development security system reform gover nance dac reference document 2005 council european union eu concept esdp support security sector reform ssr council document 12566405 13 october 2005 com mission european community concept european community support security sector reform sec2006 658 24 may 2006 ecowas ecowas conflict prevention framework ecpf enacted regulation mscreg10108 mediation security council ecowas 16 january 2008 united nation security council annex letter dated 20 november 2007 permanent representative slovakia south africa united nation addressed secretarygeneral statement cochairs international work shop enhancing united nation support security sector reform africa towards african perspective s2007687 29 november 2007 n 7 practical guidance supporting parliamentary civil society oversight security sector see born h fluri p johnsson ed parliamentary oversight security sector dcaf interparliamentary union 2003 cole e eppert k kinzelback k ed public oversight security sector dcafundp 2008 n 8 muggah robert ed security postconflict reconstruction dealing fighter math war routledge 2009 n 9 h\u00e4nggi h scherrer v ed 2008 security sector reform un integrated mission experi ence burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo lit verlag m\u00fcnster n 10 oecd dac handbook security system reform supporting security justice provides extensive guidance political technical aspect ssr different phase programme cycle organization economic cooperation development oecd dac hand book security system reform supporting security justice 2007 httpwwwoecdorg dataoecd432538406485pdf n 11 recommended interim report group expert democratic republic congo pursuant security council resolution 1698 2006 s200740 n 12 see undp bcpr 2006 vetting public employee postconflict setting operational guideline n 13 bastick megan valasek kristin ed gender security sector reform toolkit dcaf osce odihr uninstraw 2008 available httpwwwdcafchgendersecuritysectorreform gssrtoolkitcfmnavsub137navsub23nav13 n 14 see greene owen simon rynn linking coordinating ddr ssr human security conflict issue experience priority centre international cooperation security safer world university bradford july 2008 n 15 recent study african security sector network assn provides valuable insight drawn analysis ssr peace agreement 8 state africa asia central america see annex b full detail n 16 see laurent banal vincenza scherrer onub importance local ownership case burundi security sector reform un integrated mission experience burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo ed h h\u00e4nggi v scherrer lit verlag 2008 n 17 un ssr resource may available un interagency taskforce ssr capacity includes guidance resource gap analysis backstopping field operation n 18 united nation report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society s2004616 23 august 2004 para 6 n 19 united nation report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration a60705 2 march 2006 para 9 n 20 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 21 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 22 report secretarygeneral securing peace development page 1 n 23 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 48 n 24 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 50 n 25 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008 n 26 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n 5 report secretary general securing peace development", "SentID": 10909 }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196399,9 +196399,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196410,16 +196410,16 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General.", + "Sentence": "\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General.", "newParagraph": "1 box included throughout module provide practical example suggestion specific case study box draw four fieldbased case study conducted afghanistan burundi central african republic democratic republic congo support module n 2 see statement president security council 5632nd meeting security council held 20 february 2007 sprst20073 21 february 2007 statement president security council maintenance international peace security role security council humanitarian crisis challenge lesson learned way ahead sprst200530 12 july 2005 united nation report secretarygeneral securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform s200839 23 january 2008 united nation general assembly report special committee peacekeeping opera tions working group 2008 substantive session a6219 10 march 4 april 3 july 2008 n 3 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 4 state periodically review reform security sector recognising ssr postconflict challenge module focus context relevant ddr ssr concern n 5 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 6 organisation economic cooperation development security system reform gover nance dac reference document 2005 council european union eu concept esdp support security sector reform ssr council document 12566405 13 october 2005 com mission european community concept european community support security sector reform sec2006 658 24 may 2006 ecowas ecowas conflict prevention framework ecpf enacted regulation mscreg10108 mediation security council ecowas 16 january 2008 united nation security council annex letter dated 20 november 2007 permanent representative slovakia south africa united nation addressed secretarygeneral statement cochairs international work shop enhancing united nation support security sector reform africa towards african perspective s2007687 29 november 2007 n 7 practical guidance supporting parliamentary civil society oversight security sector see born h fluri p johnsson ed parliamentary oversight security sector dcaf interparliamentary union 2003 cole e eppert k kinzelback k ed public oversight security sector dcafundp 2008 n 8 muggah robert ed security postconflict reconstruction dealing fighter math war routledge 2009 n 9 h\u00e4nggi h scherrer v ed 2008 security sector reform un integrated mission experi ence burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo lit verlag m\u00fcnster n 10 oecd dac handbook security system reform supporting security justice provides extensive guidance political technical aspect ssr different phase programme cycle organization economic cooperation development oecd dac hand book security system reform supporting security justice 2007 httpwwwoecdorg dataoecd432538406485pdf n 11 recommended interim report group expert democratic republic congo pursuant security council resolution 1698 2006 s200740 n 12 see undp bcpr 2006 vetting public employee postconflict setting operational guideline n 13 bastick megan valasek kristin ed gender security sector reform toolkit dcaf osce odihr uninstraw 2008 available httpwwwdcafchgendersecuritysectorreform gssrtoolkitcfmnavsub137navsub23nav13 n 14 see greene owen simon rynn linking coordinating ddr ssr human security conflict issue experience priority centre international cooperation security safer world university bradford july 2008 n 15 recent study african security sector network assn provides valuable insight drawn analysis ssr peace agreement 8 state africa asia central america see annex b full detail n 16 see laurent banal vincenza scherrer onub importance local ownership case burundi security sector reform un integrated mission experience burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo ed h h\u00e4nggi v scherrer lit verlag 2008 n 17 un ssr resource may available un interagency taskforce ssr capacity includes guidance resource gap analysis backstopping field operation n 18 united nation report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society s2004616 23 august 2004 para 6 n 19 united nation report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration a60705 2 march 2006 para 9 n 20 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 21 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 22 report secretarygeneral securing peace development page 1 n 23 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 48 n 24 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 50 n 25 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008 n 26 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n 6 organisation economic cooperation development security system reform gover nance dac reference document 2005 council european union eu concept esdp support security sector reform ssr council document 12566405 13 october 2005 com mission european community concept european community support security sector reform sec2006 658 24 may 2006 ecowas ecowas conflict prevention framework ecpf enacted regulation mscreg10108 mediation security council ecowas 16 january 2008 united nation security council annex letter dated 20 november 2007 permanent representative slovakia south africa united nation addressed secretarygeneral", "SentID": 10911 }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196435,9 +196435,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196446,16 +196446,16 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008.", + "Sentence": "\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008.", "newParagraph": "1 box included throughout module provide practical example suggestion specific case study box draw four fieldbased case study conducted afghanistan burundi central african republic democratic republic congo support module n 2 see statement president security council 5632nd meeting security council held 20 february 2007 sprst20073 21 february 2007 statement president security council maintenance international peace security role security council humanitarian crisis challenge lesson learned way ahead sprst200530 12 july 2005 united nation report secretarygeneral securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform s200839 23 january 2008 united nation general assembly report special committee peacekeeping opera tions working group 2008 substantive session a6219 10 march 4 april 3 july 2008 n 3 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 4 state periodically review reform security sector recognising ssr postconflict challenge module focus context relevant ddr ssr concern n 5 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 6 organisation economic cooperation development security system reform gover nance dac reference document 2005 council european union eu concept esdp support security sector reform ssr council document 12566405 13 october 2005 com mission european community concept european community support security sector reform sec2006 658 24 may 2006 ecowas ecowas conflict prevention framework ecpf enacted regulation mscreg10108 mediation security council ecowas 16 january 2008 united nation security council annex letter dated 20 november 2007 permanent representative slovakia south africa united nation addressed secretarygeneral statement cochairs international work shop enhancing united nation support security sector reform africa towards african perspective s2007687 29 november 2007 n 7 practical guidance supporting parliamentary civil society oversight security sector see born h fluri p johnsson ed parliamentary oversight security sector dcaf interparliamentary union 2003 cole e eppert k kinzelback k ed public oversight security sector dcafundp 2008 n 8 muggah robert ed security postconflict reconstruction dealing fighter math war routledge 2009 n 9 h\u00e4nggi h scherrer v ed 2008 security sector reform un integrated mission experi ence burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo lit verlag m\u00fcnster n 10 oecd dac handbook security system reform supporting security justice provides extensive guidance political technical aspect ssr different phase programme cycle organization economic cooperation development oecd dac hand book security system reform supporting security justice 2007 httpwwwoecdorg dataoecd432538406485pdf n 11 recommended interim report group expert democratic republic congo pursuant security council resolution 1698 2006 s200740 n 12 see undp bcpr 2006 vetting public employee postconflict setting operational guideline n 13 bastick megan valasek kristin ed gender security sector reform toolkit dcaf osce odihr uninstraw 2008 available httpwwwdcafchgendersecuritysectorreform gssrtoolkitcfmnavsub137navsub23nav13 n 14 see greene owen simon rynn linking coordinating ddr ssr human security conflict issue experience priority centre international cooperation security safer world university bradford july 2008 n 15 recent study african security sector network assn provides valuable insight drawn analysis ssr peace agreement 8 state africa asia central america see annex b full detail n 16 see laurent banal vincenza scherrer onub importance local ownership case burundi security sector reform un integrated mission experience burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo ed h h\u00e4nggi v scherrer lit verlag 2008 n 17 un ssr resource may available un interagency taskforce ssr capacity includes guidance resource gap analysis backstopping field operation n 18 united nation report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society s2004616 23 august 2004 para 6 n 19 united nation report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration a60705 2 march 2006 para 9 n 20 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 21 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 22 report secretarygeneral securing peace development page 1 n 23 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 48 n 24 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 50 n 25 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008 n 26 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n 7 practical guidance supporting parliamentary civil society oversight security sector see born h fluri p johnsson ed parliamentary oversight security sector dcaf interparliamentary union 2003 cole e eppert k kinzelback k ed public oversight security sector dcafundp 2008", "SentID": 10913 }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196464,16 +196464,16 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009.", + "Sentence": "\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009.", "newParagraph": "1 box included throughout module provide practical example suggestion specific case study box draw four fieldbased case study conducted afghanistan burundi central african republic democratic republic congo support module n 2 see statement president security council 5632nd meeting security council held 20 february 2007 sprst20073 21 february 2007 statement president security council maintenance international peace security role security council humanitarian crisis challenge lesson learned way ahead sprst200530 12 july 2005 united nation report secretarygeneral securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform s200839 23 january 2008 united nation general assembly report special committee peacekeeping opera tions working group 2008 substantive session a6219 10 march 4 april 3 july 2008 n 3 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 4 state periodically review reform security sector recognising ssr postconflict challenge module focus context relevant ddr ssr concern n 5 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 6 organisation economic cooperation development security system reform gover nance dac reference document 2005 council european union eu concept esdp support security sector reform ssr council document 12566405 13 october 2005 com mission european community concept european community support security sector reform sec2006 658 24 may 2006 ecowas ecowas conflict prevention framework ecpf enacted regulation mscreg10108 mediation security council ecowas 16 january 2008 united nation security council annex letter dated 20 november 2007 permanent representative slovakia south africa united nation addressed secretarygeneral statement cochairs international work shop enhancing united nation support security sector reform africa towards african perspective s2007687 29 november 2007 n 7 practical guidance supporting parliamentary civil society oversight security sector see born h fluri p johnsson ed parliamentary oversight security sector dcaf interparliamentary union 2003 cole e eppert k kinzelback k ed public oversight security sector dcafundp 2008 n 8 muggah robert ed security postconflict reconstruction dealing fighter math war routledge 2009 n 9 h\u00e4nggi h scherrer v ed 2008 security sector reform un integrated mission experi ence burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo lit verlag m\u00fcnster n 10 oecd dac handbook security system reform supporting security justice provides extensive guidance political technical aspect ssr different phase programme cycle organization economic cooperation development oecd dac hand book security system reform supporting security justice 2007 httpwwwoecdorg dataoecd432538406485pdf n 11 recommended interim report group expert democratic republic congo pursuant security council resolution 1698 2006 s200740 n 12 see undp bcpr 2006 vetting public employee postconflict setting operational guideline n 13 bastick megan valasek kristin ed gender security sector reform toolkit dcaf osce odihr uninstraw 2008 available httpwwwdcafchgendersecuritysectorreform gssrtoolkitcfmnavsub137navsub23nav13 n 14 see greene owen simon rynn linking coordinating ddr ssr human security conflict issue experience priority centre international cooperation security safer world university bradford july 2008 n 15 recent study african security sector network assn provides valuable insight drawn analysis ssr peace agreement 8 state africa asia central america see annex b full detail n 16 see laurent banal vincenza scherrer onub importance local ownership case burundi security sector reform un integrated mission experience burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo ed h h\u00e4nggi v scherrer lit verlag 2008 n 17 un ssr resource may available un interagency taskforce ssr capacity includes guidance resource gap analysis backstopping field operation n 18 united nation report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society s2004616 23 august 2004 para 6 n 19 united nation report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration a60705 2 march 2006 para 9 n 20 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 21 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 22 report secretarygeneral securing peace development page 1 n 23 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 48 n 24 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 50 n 25 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008 n 26 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n 8 muggah robert ed security postconflict reconstruction dealing fighter math war routledge 2009", "SentID": 10914 }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196482,16 +196482,16 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V.", + "Sentence": "\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V.", "newParagraph": "1 box included throughout module provide practical example suggestion specific case study box draw four fieldbased case study conducted afghanistan burundi central african republic democratic republic congo support module n 2 see statement president security council 5632nd meeting security council held 20 february 2007 sprst20073 21 february 2007 statement president security council maintenance international peace security role security council humanitarian crisis challenge lesson learned way ahead sprst200530 12 july 2005 united nation report secretarygeneral securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform s200839 23 january 2008 united nation general assembly report special committee peacekeeping opera tions working group 2008 substantive session a6219 10 march 4 april 3 july 2008 n 3 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 4 state periodically review reform security sector recognising ssr postconflict challenge module focus context relevant ddr ssr concern n 5 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 6 organisation economic cooperation development security system reform gover nance dac reference document 2005 council european union eu concept esdp support security sector reform ssr council document 12566405 13 october 2005 com mission european community concept european community support security sector reform sec2006 658 24 may 2006 ecowas ecowas conflict prevention framework ecpf enacted regulation mscreg10108 mediation security council ecowas 16 january 2008 united nation security council annex letter dated 20 november 2007 permanent representative slovakia south africa united nation addressed secretarygeneral statement cochairs international work shop enhancing united nation support security sector reform africa towards african perspective s2007687 29 november 2007 n 7 practical guidance supporting parliamentary civil society oversight security sector see born h fluri p johnsson ed parliamentary oversight security sector dcaf interparliamentary union 2003 cole e eppert k kinzelback k ed public oversight security sector dcafundp 2008 n 8 muggah robert ed security postconflict reconstruction dealing fighter math war routledge 2009 n 9 h\u00e4nggi h scherrer v ed 2008 security sector reform un integrated mission experi ence burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo lit verlag m\u00fcnster n 10 oecd dac handbook security system reform supporting security justice provides extensive guidance political technical aspect ssr different phase programme cycle organization economic cooperation development oecd dac hand book security system reform supporting security justice 2007 httpwwwoecdorg dataoecd432538406485pdf n 11 recommended interim report group expert democratic republic congo pursuant security council resolution 1698 2006 s200740 n 12 see undp bcpr 2006 vetting public employee postconflict setting operational guideline n 13 bastick megan valasek kristin ed gender security sector reform toolkit dcaf osce odihr uninstraw 2008 available httpwwwdcafchgendersecuritysectorreform gssrtoolkitcfmnavsub137navsub23nav13 n 14 see greene owen simon rynn linking coordinating ddr ssr human security conflict issue experience priority centre international cooperation security safer world university bradford july 2008 n 15 recent study african security sector network assn provides valuable insight drawn analysis ssr peace agreement 8 state africa asia central america see annex b full detail n 16 see laurent banal vincenza scherrer onub importance local ownership case burundi security sector reform un integrated mission experience burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo ed h h\u00e4nggi v scherrer lit verlag 2008 n 17 un ssr resource may available un interagency taskforce ssr capacity includes guidance resource gap analysis backstopping field operation n 18 united nation report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society s2004616 23 august 2004 para 6 n 19 united nation report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration a60705 2 march 2006 para 9 n 20 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 21 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 22 report secretarygeneral securing peace development page 1 n 23 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 48 n 24 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 50 n 25 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008 n 26 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n 9 h\u00e4nggi h scherrer v", "SentID": 10915 }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196507,9 +196507,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196525,9 +196525,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196536,16 +196536,16 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle.", + "Sentence": "\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle.", "newParagraph": "1 box included throughout module provide practical example suggestion specific case study box draw four fieldbased case study conducted afghanistan burundi central african republic democratic republic congo support module n 2 see statement president security council 5632nd meeting security council held 20 february 2007 sprst20073 21 february 2007 statement president security council maintenance international peace security role security council humanitarian crisis challenge lesson learned way ahead sprst200530 12 july 2005 united nation report secretarygeneral securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform s200839 23 january 2008 united nation general assembly report special committee peacekeeping opera tions working group 2008 substantive session a6219 10 march 4 april 3 july 2008 n 3 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 4 state periodically review reform security sector recognising ssr postconflict challenge module focus context relevant ddr ssr concern n 5 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 6 organisation economic cooperation development security system reform gover nance dac reference document 2005 council european union eu concept esdp support security sector reform ssr council document 12566405 13 october 2005 com mission european community concept european community support security sector reform sec2006 658 24 may 2006 ecowas ecowas conflict prevention framework ecpf enacted regulation mscreg10108 mediation security council ecowas 16 january 2008 united nation security council annex letter dated 20 november 2007 permanent representative slovakia south africa united nation addressed secretarygeneral statement cochairs international work shop enhancing united nation support security sector reform africa towards african perspective s2007687 29 november 2007 n 7 practical guidance supporting parliamentary civil society oversight security sector see born h fluri p johnsson ed parliamentary oversight security sector dcaf interparliamentary union 2003 cole e eppert k kinzelback k ed public oversight security sector dcafundp 2008 n 8 muggah robert ed security postconflict reconstruction dealing fighter math war routledge 2009 n 9 h\u00e4nggi h scherrer v ed 2008 security sector reform un integrated mission experi ence burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo lit verlag m\u00fcnster n 10 oecd dac handbook security system reform supporting security justice provides extensive guidance political technical aspect ssr different phase programme cycle organization economic cooperation development oecd dac hand book security system reform supporting security justice 2007 httpwwwoecdorg dataoecd432538406485pdf n 11 recommended interim report group expert democratic republic congo pursuant security council resolution 1698 2006 s200740 n 12 see undp bcpr 2006 vetting public employee postconflict setting operational guideline n 13 bastick megan valasek kristin ed gender security sector reform toolkit dcaf osce odihr uninstraw 2008 available httpwwwdcafchgendersecuritysectorreform gssrtoolkitcfmnavsub137navsub23nav13 n 14 see greene owen simon rynn linking coordinating ddr ssr human security conflict issue experience priority centre international cooperation security safer world university bradford july 2008 n 15 recent study african security sector network assn provides valuable insight drawn analysis ssr peace agreement 8 state africa asia central america see annex b full detail n 16 see laurent banal vincenza scherrer onub importance local ownership case burundi security sector reform un integrated mission experience burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo ed h h\u00e4nggi v scherrer lit verlag 2008 n 17 un ssr resource may available un interagency taskforce ssr capacity includes guidance resource gap analysis backstopping field operation n 18 united nation report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society s2004616 23 august 2004 para 6 n 19 united nation report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration a60705 2 march 2006 para 9 n 20 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 21 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 22 report secretarygeneral securing peace development page 1 n 23 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 48 n 24 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 50 n 25 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008 n 26 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n 10 oecd dac handbook security system reform supporting security justice provides extensive guidance political technical aspect ssr different phase programme cycle", "SentID": 10918 }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196561,9 +196561,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196572,16 +196572,16 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40.", + "Sentence": "\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40.", "newParagraph": "1 box included throughout module provide practical example suggestion specific case study box draw four fieldbased case study conducted afghanistan burundi central african republic democratic republic congo support module n 2 see statement president security council 5632nd meeting security council held 20 february 2007 sprst20073 21 february 2007 statement president security council maintenance international peace security role security council humanitarian crisis challenge lesson learned way ahead sprst200530 12 july 2005 united nation report secretarygeneral securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform s200839 23 january 2008 united nation general assembly report special committee peacekeeping opera tions working group 2008 substantive session a6219 10 march 4 april 3 july 2008 n 3 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 4 state periodically review reform security sector recognising ssr postconflict challenge module focus context relevant ddr ssr concern n 5 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 6 organisation economic cooperation development security system reform gover nance dac reference document 2005 council european union eu concept esdp support security sector reform ssr council document 12566405 13 october 2005 com mission european community concept european community support security sector reform sec2006 658 24 may 2006 ecowas ecowas conflict prevention framework ecpf enacted regulation mscreg10108 mediation security council ecowas 16 january 2008 united nation security council annex letter dated 20 november 2007 permanent representative slovakia south africa united nation addressed secretarygeneral statement cochairs international work shop enhancing united nation support security sector reform africa towards african perspective s2007687 29 november 2007 n 7 practical guidance supporting parliamentary civil society oversight security sector see born h fluri p johnsson ed parliamentary oversight security sector dcaf interparliamentary union 2003 cole e eppert k kinzelback k ed public oversight security sector dcafundp 2008 n 8 muggah robert ed security postconflict reconstruction dealing fighter math war routledge 2009 n 9 h\u00e4nggi h scherrer v ed 2008 security sector reform un integrated mission experi ence burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo lit verlag m\u00fcnster n 10 oecd dac handbook security system reform supporting security justice provides extensive guidance political technical aspect ssr different phase programme cycle organization economic cooperation development oecd dac hand book security system reform supporting security justice 2007 httpwwwoecdorg dataoecd432538406485pdf n 11 recommended interim report group expert democratic republic congo pursuant security council resolution 1698 2006 s200740 n 12 see undp bcpr 2006 vetting public employee postconflict setting operational guideline n 13 bastick megan valasek kristin ed gender security sector reform toolkit dcaf osce odihr uninstraw 2008 available httpwwwdcafchgendersecuritysectorreform gssrtoolkitcfmnavsub137navsub23nav13 n 14 see greene owen simon rynn linking coordinating ddr ssr human security conflict issue experience priority centre international cooperation security safer world university bradford july 2008 n 15 recent study african security sector network assn provides valuable insight drawn analysis ssr peace agreement 8 state africa asia central america see annex b full detail n 16 see laurent banal vincenza scherrer onub importance local ownership case burundi security sector reform un integrated mission experience burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo ed h h\u00e4nggi v scherrer lit verlag 2008 n 17 un ssr resource may available un interagency taskforce ssr capacity includes guidance resource gap analysis backstopping field operation n 18 united nation report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society s2004616 23 august 2004 para 6 n 19 united nation report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration a60705 2 march 2006 para 9 n 20 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 21 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 22 report secretarygeneral securing peace development page 1 n 23 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 48 n 24 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 50 n 25 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008 n 26 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n 11 recommended interim report group expert democratic republic congo pursuant security council resolution 1698 2006 s200740", "SentID": 10920 }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196590,16 +196590,16 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines.", + "Sentence": "\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines.", "newParagraph": "1 box included throughout module provide practical example suggestion specific case study box draw four fieldbased case study conducted afghanistan burundi central african republic democratic republic congo support module n 2 see statement president security council 5632nd meeting security council held 20 february 2007 sprst20073 21 february 2007 statement president security council maintenance international peace security role security council humanitarian crisis challenge lesson learned way ahead sprst200530 12 july 2005 united nation report secretarygeneral securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform s200839 23 january 2008 united nation general assembly report special committee peacekeeping opera tions working group 2008 substantive session a6219 10 march 4 april 3 july 2008 n 3 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 4 state periodically review reform security sector recognising ssr postconflict challenge module focus context relevant ddr ssr concern n 5 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 6 organisation economic cooperation development security system reform gover nance dac reference document 2005 council european union eu concept esdp support security sector reform ssr council document 12566405 13 october 2005 com mission european community concept european community support security sector reform sec2006 658 24 may 2006 ecowas ecowas conflict prevention framework ecpf enacted regulation mscreg10108 mediation security council ecowas 16 january 2008 united nation security council annex letter dated 20 november 2007 permanent representative slovakia south africa united nation addressed secretarygeneral statement cochairs international work shop enhancing united nation support security sector reform africa towards african perspective s2007687 29 november 2007 n 7 practical guidance supporting parliamentary civil society oversight security sector see born h fluri p johnsson ed parliamentary oversight security sector dcaf interparliamentary union 2003 cole e eppert k kinzelback k ed public oversight security sector dcafundp 2008 n 8 muggah robert ed security postconflict reconstruction dealing fighter math war routledge 2009 n 9 h\u00e4nggi h scherrer v ed 2008 security sector reform un integrated mission experi ence burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo lit verlag m\u00fcnster n 10 oecd dac handbook security system reform supporting security justice provides extensive guidance political technical aspect ssr different phase programme cycle organization economic cooperation development oecd dac hand book security system reform supporting security justice 2007 httpwwwoecdorg dataoecd432538406485pdf n 11 recommended interim report group expert democratic republic congo pursuant security council resolution 1698 2006 s200740 n 12 see undp bcpr 2006 vetting public employee postconflict setting operational guideline n 13 bastick megan valasek kristin ed gender security sector reform toolkit dcaf osce odihr uninstraw 2008 available httpwwwdcafchgendersecuritysectorreform gssrtoolkitcfmnavsub137navsub23nav13 n 14 see greene owen simon rynn linking coordinating ddr ssr human security conflict issue experience priority centre international cooperation security safer world university bradford july 2008 n 15 recent study african security sector network assn provides valuable insight drawn analysis ssr peace agreement 8 state africa asia central america see annex b full detail n 16 see laurent banal vincenza scherrer onub importance local ownership case burundi security sector reform un integrated mission experience burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo ed h h\u00e4nggi v scherrer lit verlag 2008 n 17 un ssr resource may available un interagency taskforce ssr capacity includes guidance resource gap analysis backstopping field operation n 18 united nation report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society s2004616 23 august 2004 para 6 n 19 united nation report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration a60705 2 march 2006 para 9 n 20 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 21 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 22 report secretarygeneral securing peace development page 1 n 23 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 48 n 24 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 50 n 25 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008 n 26 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n 12 see undp bcpr 2006 vetting public employee postconflict setting operational guideline", "SentID": 10921 }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196608,16 +196608,16 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds).", + "Sentence": "\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds).", "newParagraph": "1 box included throughout module provide practical example suggestion specific case study box draw four fieldbased case study conducted afghanistan burundi central african republic democratic republic congo support module n 2 see statement president security council 5632nd meeting security council held 20 february 2007 sprst20073 21 february 2007 statement president security council maintenance international peace security role security council humanitarian crisis challenge lesson learned way ahead sprst200530 12 july 2005 united nation report secretarygeneral securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform s200839 23 january 2008 united nation general assembly report special committee peacekeeping opera tions working group 2008 substantive session a6219 10 march 4 april 3 july 2008 n 3 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 4 state periodically review reform security sector recognising ssr postconflict challenge module focus context relevant ddr ssr concern n 5 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 6 organisation economic cooperation development security system reform gover nance dac reference document 2005 council european union eu concept esdp support security sector reform ssr council document 12566405 13 october 2005 com mission european community concept european community support security sector reform sec2006 658 24 may 2006 ecowas ecowas conflict prevention framework ecpf enacted regulation mscreg10108 mediation security council ecowas 16 january 2008 united nation security council annex letter dated 20 november 2007 permanent representative slovakia south africa united nation addressed secretarygeneral statement cochairs international work shop enhancing united nation support security sector reform africa towards african perspective s2007687 29 november 2007 n 7 practical guidance supporting parliamentary civil society oversight security sector see born h fluri p johnsson ed parliamentary oversight security sector dcaf interparliamentary union 2003 cole e eppert k kinzelback k ed public oversight security sector dcafundp 2008 n 8 muggah robert ed security postconflict reconstruction dealing fighter math war routledge 2009 n 9 h\u00e4nggi h scherrer v ed 2008 security sector reform un integrated mission experi ence burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo lit verlag m\u00fcnster n 10 oecd dac handbook security system reform supporting security justice provides extensive guidance political technical aspect ssr different phase programme cycle organization economic cooperation development oecd dac hand book security system reform supporting security justice 2007 httpwwwoecdorg dataoecd432538406485pdf n 11 recommended interim report group expert democratic republic congo pursuant security council resolution 1698 2006 s200740 n 12 see undp bcpr 2006 vetting public employee postconflict setting operational guideline n 13 bastick megan valasek kristin ed gender security sector reform toolkit dcaf osce odihr uninstraw 2008 available httpwwwdcafchgendersecuritysectorreform gssrtoolkitcfmnavsub137navsub23nav13 n 14 see greene owen simon rynn linking coordinating ddr ssr human security conflict issue experience priority centre international cooperation security safer world university bradford july 2008 n 15 recent study african security sector network assn provides valuable insight drawn analysis ssr peace agreement 8 state africa asia central america see annex b full detail n 16 see laurent banal vincenza scherrer onub importance local ownership case burundi security sector reform un integrated mission experience burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo ed h h\u00e4nggi v scherrer lit verlag 2008 n 17 un ssr resource may available un interagency taskforce ssr capacity includes guidance resource gap analysis backstopping field operation n 18 united nation report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society s2004616 23 august 2004 para 6 n 19 united nation report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration a60705 2 march 2006 para 9 n 20 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 21 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 22 report secretarygeneral securing peace development page 1 n 23 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 48 n 24 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 50 n 25 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008 n 26 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n 13 bastick megan valasek kristin ed", "SentID": 10922 }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196633,9 +196633,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196651,9 +196651,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196662,16 +196662,16 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008.", + "Sentence": "Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008.", "newParagraph": "1 box included throughout module provide practical example suggestion specific case study box draw four fieldbased case study conducted afghanistan burundi central african republic democratic republic congo support module n 2 see statement president security council 5632nd meeting security council held 20 february 2007 sprst20073 21 february 2007 statement president security council maintenance international peace security role security council humanitarian crisis challenge lesson learned way ahead sprst200530 12 july 2005 united nation report secretarygeneral securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform s200839 23 january 2008 united nation general assembly report special committee peacekeeping opera tions working group 2008 substantive session a6219 10 march 4 april 3 july 2008 n 3 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 4 state periodically review reform security sector recognising ssr postconflict challenge module focus context relevant ddr ssr concern n 5 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 6 organisation economic cooperation development security system reform gover nance dac reference document 2005 council european union eu concept esdp support security sector reform ssr council document 12566405 13 october 2005 com mission european community concept european community support security sector reform sec2006 658 24 may 2006 ecowas ecowas conflict prevention framework ecpf enacted regulation mscreg10108 mediation security council ecowas 16 january 2008 united nation security council annex letter dated 20 november 2007 permanent representative slovakia south africa united nation addressed secretarygeneral statement cochairs international work shop enhancing united nation support security sector reform africa towards african perspective s2007687 29 november 2007 n 7 practical guidance supporting parliamentary civil society oversight security sector see born h fluri p johnsson ed parliamentary oversight security sector dcaf interparliamentary union 2003 cole e eppert k kinzelback k ed public oversight security sector dcafundp 2008 n 8 muggah robert ed security postconflict reconstruction dealing fighter math war routledge 2009 n 9 h\u00e4nggi h scherrer v ed 2008 security sector reform un integrated mission experi ence burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo lit verlag m\u00fcnster n 10 oecd dac handbook security system reform supporting security justice provides extensive guidance political technical aspect ssr different phase programme cycle organization economic cooperation development oecd dac hand book security system reform supporting security justice 2007 httpwwwoecdorg dataoecd432538406485pdf n 11 recommended interim report group expert democratic republic congo pursuant security council resolution 1698 2006 s200740 n 12 see undp bcpr 2006 vetting public employee postconflict setting operational guideline n 13 bastick megan valasek kristin ed gender security sector reform toolkit dcaf osce odihr uninstraw 2008 available httpwwwdcafchgendersecuritysectorreform gssrtoolkitcfmnavsub137navsub23nav13 n 14 see greene owen simon rynn linking coordinating ddr ssr human security conflict issue experience priority centre international cooperation security safer world university bradford july 2008 n 15 recent study african security sector network assn provides valuable insight drawn analysis ssr peace agreement 8 state africa asia central america see annex b full detail n 16 see laurent banal vincenza scherrer onub importance local ownership case burundi security sector reform un integrated mission experience burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo ed h h\u00e4nggi v scherrer lit verlag 2008 n 17 un ssr resource may available un interagency taskforce ssr capacity includes guidance resource gap analysis backstopping field operation n 18 united nation report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society s2004616 23 august 2004 para 6 n 19 united nation report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration a60705 2 march 2006 para 9 n 20 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 21 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 22 report secretarygeneral securing peace development page 1 n 23 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 48 n 24 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 50 n 25 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008 n 26 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008", "ProcessedSent": "available httpwwwdcafchgendersecuritysectorreform gssrtoolkitcfmnavsub137navsub23nav13 n 14 see greene owen simon rynn linking coordinating ddr ssr human security conflict issue experience priority centre international cooperation security safer world university bradford july 2008", "SentID": 10925 }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196680,16 +196680,16 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details).", + "Sentence": "\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details).", "newParagraph": "1 box included throughout module provide practical example suggestion specific case study box draw four fieldbased case study conducted afghanistan burundi central african republic democratic republic congo support module n 2 see statement president security council 5632nd meeting security council held 20 february 2007 sprst20073 21 february 2007 statement president security council maintenance international peace security role security council humanitarian crisis challenge lesson learned way ahead sprst200530 12 july 2005 united nation report secretarygeneral securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform s200839 23 january 2008 united nation general assembly report special committee peacekeeping opera tions working group 2008 substantive session a6219 10 march 4 april 3 july 2008 n 3 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 4 state periodically review reform security sector recognising ssr postconflict challenge module focus context relevant ddr ssr concern n 5 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 6 organisation economic cooperation development security system reform gover nance dac reference document 2005 council european union eu concept esdp support security sector reform ssr council document 12566405 13 october 2005 com mission european community concept european community support security sector reform sec2006 658 24 may 2006 ecowas ecowas conflict prevention framework ecpf enacted regulation mscreg10108 mediation security council ecowas 16 january 2008 united nation security council annex letter dated 20 november 2007 permanent representative slovakia south africa united nation addressed secretarygeneral statement cochairs international work shop enhancing united nation support security sector reform africa towards african perspective s2007687 29 november 2007 n 7 practical guidance supporting parliamentary civil society oversight security sector see born h fluri p johnsson ed parliamentary oversight security sector dcaf interparliamentary union 2003 cole e eppert k kinzelback k ed public oversight security sector dcafundp 2008 n 8 muggah robert ed security postconflict reconstruction dealing fighter math war routledge 2009 n 9 h\u00e4nggi h scherrer v ed 2008 security sector reform un integrated mission experi ence burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo lit verlag m\u00fcnster n 10 oecd dac handbook security system reform supporting security justice provides extensive guidance political technical aspect ssr different phase programme cycle organization economic cooperation development oecd dac hand book security system reform supporting security justice 2007 httpwwwoecdorg dataoecd432538406485pdf n 11 recommended interim report group expert democratic republic congo pursuant security council resolution 1698 2006 s200740 n 12 see undp bcpr 2006 vetting public employee postconflict setting operational guideline n 13 bastick megan valasek kristin ed gender security sector reform toolkit dcaf osce odihr uninstraw 2008 available httpwwwdcafchgendersecuritysectorreform gssrtoolkitcfmnavsub137navsub23nav13 n 14 see greene owen simon rynn linking coordinating ddr ssr human security conflict issue experience priority centre international cooperation security safer world university bradford july 2008 n 15 recent study african security sector network assn provides valuable insight drawn analysis ssr peace agreement 8 state africa asia central america see annex b full detail n 16 see laurent banal vincenza scherrer onub importance local ownership case burundi security sector reform un integrated mission experience burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo ed h h\u00e4nggi v scherrer lit verlag 2008 n 17 un ssr resource may available un interagency taskforce ssr capacity includes guidance resource gap analysis backstopping field operation n 18 united nation report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society s2004616 23 august 2004 para 6 n 19 united nation report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration a60705 2 march 2006 para 9 n 20 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 21 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 22 report secretarygeneral securing peace development page 1 n 23 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 48 n 24 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 50 n 25 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008 n 26 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n 15 recent study african security sector network assn provides valuable insight drawn analysis ssr peace agreement 8 state africa asia central america see annex b full detail", "SentID": 10926 }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196698,16 +196698,16 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds.", + "Sentence": "\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds.", "newParagraph": "1 box included throughout module provide practical example suggestion specific case study box draw four fieldbased case study conducted afghanistan burundi central african republic democratic republic congo support module n 2 see statement president security council 5632nd meeting security council held 20 february 2007 sprst20073 21 february 2007 statement president security council maintenance international peace security role security council humanitarian crisis challenge lesson learned way ahead sprst200530 12 july 2005 united nation report secretarygeneral securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform s200839 23 january 2008 united nation general assembly report special committee peacekeeping opera tions working group 2008 substantive session a6219 10 march 4 april 3 july 2008 n 3 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 4 state periodically review reform security sector recognising ssr postconflict challenge module focus context relevant ddr ssr concern n 5 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 6 organisation economic cooperation development security system reform gover nance dac reference document 2005 council european union eu concept esdp support security sector reform ssr council document 12566405 13 october 2005 com mission european community concept european community support security sector reform sec2006 658 24 may 2006 ecowas ecowas conflict prevention framework ecpf enacted regulation mscreg10108 mediation security council ecowas 16 january 2008 united nation security council annex letter dated 20 november 2007 permanent representative slovakia south africa united nation addressed secretarygeneral statement cochairs international work shop enhancing united nation support security sector reform africa towards african perspective s2007687 29 november 2007 n 7 practical guidance supporting parliamentary civil society oversight security sector see born h fluri p johnsson ed parliamentary oversight security sector dcaf interparliamentary union 2003 cole e eppert k kinzelback k ed public oversight security sector dcafundp 2008 n 8 muggah robert ed security postconflict reconstruction dealing fighter math war routledge 2009 n 9 h\u00e4nggi h scherrer v ed 2008 security sector reform un integrated mission experi ence burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo lit verlag m\u00fcnster n 10 oecd dac handbook security system reform supporting security justice provides extensive guidance political technical aspect ssr different phase programme cycle organization economic cooperation development oecd dac hand book security system reform supporting security justice 2007 httpwwwoecdorg dataoecd432538406485pdf n 11 recommended interim report group expert democratic republic congo pursuant security council resolution 1698 2006 s200740 n 12 see undp bcpr 2006 vetting public employee postconflict setting operational guideline n 13 bastick megan valasek kristin ed gender security sector reform toolkit dcaf osce odihr uninstraw 2008 available httpwwwdcafchgendersecuritysectorreform gssrtoolkitcfmnavsub137navsub23nav13 n 14 see greene owen simon rynn linking coordinating ddr ssr human security conflict issue experience priority centre international cooperation security safer world university bradford july 2008 n 15 recent study african security sector network assn provides valuable insight drawn analysis ssr peace agreement 8 state africa asia central america see annex b full detail n 16 see laurent banal vincenza scherrer onub importance local ownership case burundi security sector reform un integrated mission experience burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo ed h h\u00e4nggi v scherrer lit verlag 2008 n 17 un ssr resource may available un interagency taskforce ssr capacity includes guidance resource gap analysis backstopping field operation n 18 united nation report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society s2004616 23 august 2004 para 6 n 19 united nation report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration a60705 2 march 2006 para 9 n 20 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 21 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 22 report secretarygeneral securing peace development page 1 n 23 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 48 n 24 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 50 n 25 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008 n 26 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n 16 see laurent banal vincenza scherrer onub importance local ownership case burundi security sector reform un integrated mission experience burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo ed", "SentID": 10927 }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196723,9 +196723,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196734,16 +196734,16 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR.", + "Sentence": "\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR.", "newParagraph": "1 box included throughout module provide practical example suggestion specific case study box draw four fieldbased case study conducted afghanistan burundi central african republic democratic republic congo support module n 2 see statement president security council 5632nd meeting security council held 20 february 2007 sprst20073 21 february 2007 statement president security council maintenance international peace security role security council humanitarian crisis challenge lesson learned way ahead sprst200530 12 july 2005 united nation report secretarygeneral securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform s200839 23 january 2008 united nation general assembly report special committee peacekeeping opera tions working group 2008 substantive session a6219 10 march 4 april 3 july 2008 n 3 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 4 state periodically review reform security sector recognising ssr postconflict challenge module focus context relevant ddr ssr concern n 5 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 6 organisation economic cooperation development security system reform gover nance dac reference document 2005 council european union eu concept esdp support security sector reform ssr council document 12566405 13 october 2005 com mission european community concept european community support security sector reform sec2006 658 24 may 2006 ecowas ecowas conflict prevention framework ecpf enacted regulation mscreg10108 mediation security council ecowas 16 january 2008 united nation security council annex letter dated 20 november 2007 permanent representative slovakia south africa united nation addressed secretarygeneral statement cochairs international work shop enhancing united nation support security sector reform africa towards african perspective s2007687 29 november 2007 n 7 practical guidance supporting parliamentary civil society oversight security sector see born h fluri p johnsson ed parliamentary oversight security sector dcaf interparliamentary union 2003 cole e eppert k kinzelback k ed public oversight security sector dcafundp 2008 n 8 muggah robert ed security postconflict reconstruction dealing fighter math war routledge 2009 n 9 h\u00e4nggi h scherrer v ed 2008 security sector reform un integrated mission experi ence burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo lit verlag m\u00fcnster n 10 oecd dac handbook security system reform supporting security justice provides extensive guidance political technical aspect ssr different phase programme cycle organization economic cooperation development oecd dac hand book security system reform supporting security justice 2007 httpwwwoecdorg dataoecd432538406485pdf n 11 recommended interim report group expert democratic republic congo pursuant security council resolution 1698 2006 s200740 n 12 see undp bcpr 2006 vetting public employee postconflict setting operational guideline n 13 bastick megan valasek kristin ed gender security sector reform toolkit dcaf osce odihr uninstraw 2008 available httpwwwdcafchgendersecuritysectorreform gssrtoolkitcfmnavsub137navsub23nav13 n 14 see greene owen simon rynn linking coordinating ddr ssr human security conflict issue experience priority centre international cooperation security safer world university bradford july 2008 n 15 recent study african security sector network assn provides valuable insight drawn analysis ssr peace agreement 8 state africa asia central america see annex b full detail n 16 see laurent banal vincenza scherrer onub importance local ownership case burundi security sector reform un integrated mission experience burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo ed h h\u00e4nggi v scherrer lit verlag 2008 n 17 un ssr resource may available un interagency taskforce ssr capacity includes guidance resource gap analysis backstopping field operation n 18 united nation report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society s2004616 23 august 2004 para 6 n 19 united nation report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration a60705 2 march 2006 para 9 n 20 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 21 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 22 report secretarygeneral securing peace development page 1 n 23 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 48 n 24 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 50 n 25 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008 n 26 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n 17 un ssr resource may available un interagency taskforce ssr", "SentID": 10929 }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196759,9 +196759,9 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196770,16 +196770,16 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6.", + "Sentence": "\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6.", "newParagraph": "1 box included throughout module provide practical example suggestion specific case study box draw four fieldbased case study conducted afghanistan burundi central african republic democratic republic congo support module n 2 see statement president security council 5632nd meeting security council held 20 february 2007 sprst20073 21 february 2007 statement president security council maintenance international peace security role security council humanitarian crisis challenge lesson learned way ahead sprst200530 12 july 2005 united nation report secretarygeneral securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform s200839 23 january 2008 united nation general assembly report special committee peacekeeping opera tions working group 2008 substantive session a6219 10 march 4 april 3 july 2008 n 3 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 4 state periodically review reform security sector recognising ssr postconflict challenge module focus context relevant ddr ssr concern n 5 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 6 organisation economic cooperation development security system reform gover nance dac reference document 2005 council european union eu concept esdp support security sector reform ssr council document 12566405 13 october 2005 com mission european community concept european community support security sector reform sec2006 658 24 may 2006 ecowas ecowas conflict prevention framework ecpf enacted regulation mscreg10108 mediation security council ecowas 16 january 2008 united nation security council annex letter dated 20 november 2007 permanent representative slovakia south africa united nation addressed secretarygeneral statement cochairs international work shop enhancing united nation support security sector reform africa towards african perspective s2007687 29 november 2007 n 7 practical guidance supporting parliamentary civil society oversight security sector see born h fluri p johnsson ed parliamentary oversight security sector dcaf interparliamentary union 2003 cole e eppert k kinzelback k ed public oversight security sector dcafundp 2008 n 8 muggah robert ed security postconflict reconstruction dealing fighter math war routledge 2009 n 9 h\u00e4nggi h scherrer v ed 2008 security sector reform un integrated mission experi ence burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo lit verlag m\u00fcnster n 10 oecd dac handbook security system reform supporting security justice provides extensive guidance political technical aspect ssr different phase programme cycle organization economic cooperation development oecd dac hand book security system reform supporting security justice 2007 httpwwwoecdorg dataoecd432538406485pdf n 11 recommended interim report group expert democratic republic congo pursuant security council resolution 1698 2006 s200740 n 12 see undp bcpr 2006 vetting public employee postconflict setting operational guideline n 13 bastick megan valasek kristin ed gender security sector reform toolkit dcaf osce odihr uninstraw 2008 available httpwwwdcafchgendersecuritysectorreform gssrtoolkitcfmnavsub137navsub23nav13 n 14 see greene owen simon rynn linking coordinating ddr ssr human security conflict issue experience priority centre international cooperation security safer world university bradford july 2008 n 15 recent study african security sector network assn provides valuable insight drawn analysis ssr peace agreement 8 state africa asia central america see annex b full detail n 16 see laurent banal vincenza scherrer onub importance local ownership case burundi security sector reform un integrated mission experience burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo ed h h\u00e4nggi v scherrer lit verlag 2008 n 17 un ssr resource may available un interagency taskforce ssr capacity includes guidance resource gap analysis backstopping field operation n 18 united nation report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society s2004616 23 august 2004 para 6 n 19 united nation report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration a60705 2 march 2006 para 9 n 20 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 21 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 22 report secretarygeneral securing peace development page 1 n 23 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 48 n 24 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 50 n 25 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008 n 26 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n 18 united nation report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society s2004616 23 august 2004 para 6", "SentID": 10931 }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196788,16 +196788,16 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9.", + "Sentence": "\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9.", "newParagraph": "1 box included throughout module provide practical example suggestion specific case study box draw four fieldbased case study conducted afghanistan burundi central african republic democratic republic congo support module n 2 see statement president security council 5632nd meeting security council held 20 february 2007 sprst20073 21 february 2007 statement president security council maintenance international peace security role security council humanitarian crisis challenge lesson learned way ahead sprst200530 12 july 2005 united nation report secretarygeneral securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform s200839 23 january 2008 united nation general assembly report special committee peacekeeping opera tions working group 2008 substantive session a6219 10 march 4 april 3 july 2008 n 3 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 4 state periodically review reform security sector recognising ssr postconflict challenge module focus context relevant ddr ssr concern n 5 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 6 organisation economic cooperation development security system reform gover nance dac reference document 2005 council european union eu concept esdp support security sector reform ssr council document 12566405 13 october 2005 com mission european community concept european community support security sector reform sec2006 658 24 may 2006 ecowas ecowas conflict prevention framework ecpf enacted regulation mscreg10108 mediation security council ecowas 16 january 2008 united nation security council annex letter dated 20 november 2007 permanent representative slovakia south africa united nation addressed secretarygeneral statement cochairs international work shop enhancing united nation support security sector reform africa towards african perspective s2007687 29 november 2007 n 7 practical guidance supporting parliamentary civil society oversight security sector see born h fluri p johnsson ed parliamentary oversight security sector dcaf interparliamentary union 2003 cole e eppert k kinzelback k ed public oversight security sector dcafundp 2008 n 8 muggah robert ed security postconflict reconstruction dealing fighter math war routledge 2009 n 9 h\u00e4nggi h scherrer v ed 2008 security sector reform un integrated mission experi ence burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo lit verlag m\u00fcnster n 10 oecd dac handbook security system reform supporting security justice provides extensive guidance political technical aspect ssr different phase programme cycle organization economic cooperation development oecd dac hand book security system reform supporting security justice 2007 httpwwwoecdorg dataoecd432538406485pdf n 11 recommended interim report group expert democratic republic congo pursuant security council resolution 1698 2006 s200740 n 12 see undp bcpr 2006 vetting public employee postconflict setting operational guideline n 13 bastick megan valasek kristin ed gender security sector reform toolkit dcaf osce odihr uninstraw 2008 available httpwwwdcafchgendersecuritysectorreform gssrtoolkitcfmnavsub137navsub23nav13 n 14 see greene owen simon rynn linking coordinating ddr ssr human security conflict issue experience priority centre international cooperation security safer world university bradford july 2008 n 15 recent study african security sector network assn provides valuable insight drawn analysis ssr peace agreement 8 state africa asia central america see annex b full detail n 16 see laurent banal vincenza scherrer onub importance local ownership case burundi security sector reform un integrated mission experience burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo ed h h\u00e4nggi v scherrer lit verlag 2008 n 17 un ssr resource may available un interagency taskforce ssr capacity includes guidance resource gap analysis backstopping field operation n 18 united nation report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society s2004616 23 august 2004 para 6 n 19 united nation report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration a60705 2 march 2006 para 9 n 20 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 21 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 22 report secretarygeneral securing peace development page 1 n 23 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 48 n 24 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 50 n 25 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008 n 26 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n 19 united nation report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration a60705 2 march 2006 para 9", "SentID": 10932 }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196806,16 +196806,16 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007.", + "Sentence": "\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007.", "newParagraph": "1 box included throughout module provide practical example suggestion specific case study box draw four fieldbased case study conducted afghanistan burundi central african republic democratic republic congo support module n 2 see statement president security council 5632nd meeting security council held 20 february 2007 sprst20073 21 february 2007 statement president security council maintenance international peace security role security council humanitarian crisis challenge lesson learned way ahead sprst200530 12 july 2005 united nation report secretarygeneral securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform s200839 23 january 2008 united nation general assembly report special committee peacekeeping opera tions working group 2008 substantive session a6219 10 march 4 april 3 july 2008 n 3 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 4 state periodically review reform security sector recognising ssr postconflict challenge module focus context relevant ddr ssr concern n 5 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 6 organisation economic cooperation development security system reform gover nance dac reference document 2005 council european union eu concept esdp support security sector reform ssr council document 12566405 13 october 2005 com mission european community concept european community support security sector reform sec2006 658 24 may 2006 ecowas ecowas conflict prevention framework ecpf enacted regulation mscreg10108 mediation security council ecowas 16 january 2008 united nation security council annex letter dated 20 november 2007 permanent representative slovakia south africa united nation addressed secretarygeneral statement cochairs international work shop enhancing united nation support security sector reform africa towards african perspective s2007687 29 november 2007 n 7 practical guidance supporting parliamentary civil society oversight security sector see born h fluri p johnsson ed parliamentary oversight security sector dcaf interparliamentary union 2003 cole e eppert k kinzelback k ed public oversight security sector dcafundp 2008 n 8 muggah robert ed security postconflict reconstruction dealing fighter math war routledge 2009 n 9 h\u00e4nggi h scherrer v ed 2008 security sector reform un integrated mission experi ence burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo lit verlag m\u00fcnster n 10 oecd dac handbook security system reform supporting security justice provides extensive guidance political technical aspect ssr different phase programme cycle organization economic cooperation development oecd dac hand book security system reform supporting security justice 2007 httpwwwoecdorg dataoecd432538406485pdf n 11 recommended interim report group expert democratic republic congo pursuant security council resolution 1698 2006 s200740 n 12 see undp bcpr 2006 vetting public employee postconflict setting operational guideline n 13 bastick megan valasek kristin ed gender security sector reform toolkit dcaf osce odihr uninstraw 2008 available httpwwwdcafchgendersecuritysectorreform gssrtoolkitcfmnavsub137navsub23nav13 n 14 see greene owen simon rynn linking coordinating ddr ssr human security conflict issue experience priority centre international cooperation security safer world university bradford july 2008 n 15 recent study african security sector network assn provides valuable insight drawn analysis ssr peace agreement 8 state africa asia central america see annex b full detail n 16 see laurent banal vincenza scherrer onub importance local ownership case burundi security sector reform un integrated mission experience burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo ed h h\u00e4nggi v scherrer lit verlag 2008 n 17 un ssr resource may available un interagency taskforce ssr capacity includes guidance resource gap analysis backstopping field operation n 18 united nation report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society s2004616 23 august 2004 para 6 n 19 united nation report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration a60705 2 march 2006 para 9 n 20 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 21 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 22 report secretarygeneral securing peace development page 1 n 23 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 48 n 24 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 50 n 25 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008 n 26 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n 20 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007", "SentID": 10933 }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196824,16 +196824,16 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007.", + "Sentence": "\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007.", "newParagraph": "1 box included throughout module provide practical example suggestion specific case study box draw four fieldbased case study conducted afghanistan burundi central african republic democratic republic congo support module n 2 see statement president security council 5632nd meeting security council held 20 february 2007 sprst20073 21 february 2007 statement president security council maintenance international peace security role security council humanitarian crisis challenge lesson learned way ahead sprst200530 12 july 2005 united nation report secretarygeneral securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform s200839 23 january 2008 united nation general assembly report special committee peacekeeping opera tions working group 2008 substantive session a6219 10 march 4 april 3 july 2008 n 3 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 4 state periodically review reform security sector recognising ssr postconflict challenge module focus context relevant ddr ssr concern n 5 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 6 organisation economic cooperation development security system reform gover nance dac reference document 2005 council european union eu concept esdp support security sector reform ssr council document 12566405 13 october 2005 com mission european community concept european community support security sector reform sec2006 658 24 may 2006 ecowas ecowas conflict prevention framework ecpf enacted regulation mscreg10108 mediation security council ecowas 16 january 2008 united nation security council annex letter dated 20 november 2007 permanent representative slovakia south africa united nation addressed secretarygeneral statement cochairs international work shop enhancing united nation support security sector reform africa towards african perspective s2007687 29 november 2007 n 7 practical guidance supporting parliamentary civil society oversight security sector see born h fluri p johnsson ed parliamentary oversight security sector dcaf interparliamentary union 2003 cole e eppert k kinzelback k ed public oversight security sector dcafundp 2008 n 8 muggah robert ed security postconflict reconstruction dealing fighter math war routledge 2009 n 9 h\u00e4nggi h scherrer v ed 2008 security sector reform un integrated mission experi ence burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo lit verlag m\u00fcnster n 10 oecd dac handbook security system reform supporting security justice provides extensive guidance political technical aspect ssr different phase programme cycle organization economic cooperation development oecd dac hand book security system reform supporting security justice 2007 httpwwwoecdorg dataoecd432538406485pdf n 11 recommended interim report group expert democratic republic congo pursuant security council resolution 1698 2006 s200740 n 12 see undp bcpr 2006 vetting public employee postconflict setting operational guideline n 13 bastick megan valasek kristin ed gender security sector reform toolkit dcaf osce odihr uninstraw 2008 available httpwwwdcafchgendersecuritysectorreform gssrtoolkitcfmnavsub137navsub23nav13 n 14 see greene owen simon rynn linking coordinating ddr ssr human security conflict issue experience priority centre international cooperation security safer world university bradford july 2008 n 15 recent study african security sector network assn provides valuable insight drawn analysis ssr peace agreement 8 state africa asia central america see annex b full detail n 16 see laurent banal vincenza scherrer onub importance local ownership case burundi security sector reform un integrated mission experience burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo ed h h\u00e4nggi v scherrer lit verlag 2008 n 17 un ssr resource may available un interagency taskforce ssr capacity includes guidance resource gap analysis backstopping field operation n 18 united nation report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society s2004616 23 august 2004 para 6 n 19 united nation report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration a60705 2 march 2006 para 9 n 20 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 21 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 22 report secretarygeneral securing peace development page 1 n 23 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 48 n 24 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 50 n 25 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008 n 26 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n 21 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007", "SentID": 10934 }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196842,16 +196842,16 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1.", + "Sentence": "\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1.", "newParagraph": "1 box included throughout module provide practical example suggestion specific case study box draw four fieldbased case study conducted afghanistan burundi central african republic democratic republic congo support module n 2 see statement president security council 5632nd meeting security council held 20 february 2007 sprst20073 21 february 2007 statement president security council maintenance international peace security role security council humanitarian crisis challenge lesson learned way ahead sprst200530 12 july 2005 united nation report secretarygeneral securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform s200839 23 january 2008 united nation general assembly report special committee peacekeeping opera tions working group 2008 substantive session a6219 10 march 4 april 3 july 2008 n 3 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 4 state periodically review reform security sector recognising ssr postconflict challenge module focus context relevant ddr ssr concern n 5 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 6 organisation economic cooperation development security system reform gover nance dac reference document 2005 council european union eu concept esdp support security sector reform ssr council document 12566405 13 october 2005 com mission european community concept european community support security sector reform sec2006 658 24 may 2006 ecowas ecowas conflict prevention framework ecpf enacted regulation mscreg10108 mediation security council ecowas 16 january 2008 united nation security council annex letter dated 20 november 2007 permanent representative slovakia south africa united nation addressed secretarygeneral statement cochairs international work shop enhancing united nation support security sector reform africa towards african perspective s2007687 29 november 2007 n 7 practical guidance supporting parliamentary civil society oversight security sector see born h fluri p johnsson ed parliamentary oversight security sector dcaf interparliamentary union 2003 cole e eppert k kinzelback k ed public oversight security sector dcafundp 2008 n 8 muggah robert ed security postconflict reconstruction dealing fighter math war routledge 2009 n 9 h\u00e4nggi h scherrer v ed 2008 security sector reform un integrated mission experi ence burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo lit verlag m\u00fcnster n 10 oecd dac handbook security system reform supporting security justice provides extensive guidance political technical aspect ssr different phase programme cycle organization economic cooperation development oecd dac hand book security system reform supporting security justice 2007 httpwwwoecdorg dataoecd432538406485pdf n 11 recommended interim report group expert democratic republic congo pursuant security council resolution 1698 2006 s200740 n 12 see undp bcpr 2006 vetting public employee postconflict setting operational guideline n 13 bastick megan valasek kristin ed gender security sector reform toolkit dcaf osce odihr uninstraw 2008 available httpwwwdcafchgendersecuritysectorreform gssrtoolkitcfmnavsub137navsub23nav13 n 14 see greene owen simon rynn linking coordinating ddr ssr human security conflict issue experience priority centre international cooperation security safer world university bradford july 2008 n 15 recent study african security sector network assn provides valuable insight drawn analysis ssr peace agreement 8 state africa asia central america see annex b full detail n 16 see laurent banal vincenza scherrer onub importance local ownership case burundi security sector reform un integrated mission experience burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo ed h h\u00e4nggi v scherrer lit verlag 2008 n 17 un ssr resource may available un interagency taskforce ssr capacity includes guidance resource gap analysis backstopping field operation n 18 united nation report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society s2004616 23 august 2004 para 6 n 19 united nation report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration a60705 2 march 2006 para 9 n 20 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 21 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 22 report secretarygeneral securing peace development page 1 n 23 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 48 n 24 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 50 n 25 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008 n 26 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n 22 report secretarygeneral securing peace development page 1", "SentID": 10935 }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196860,16 +196860,16 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48.", + "Sentence": "\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48.", "newParagraph": "1 box included throughout module provide practical example suggestion specific case study box draw four fieldbased case study conducted afghanistan burundi central african republic democratic republic congo support module n 2 see statement president security council 5632nd meeting security council held 20 february 2007 sprst20073 21 february 2007 statement president security council maintenance international peace security role security council humanitarian crisis challenge lesson learned way ahead sprst200530 12 july 2005 united nation report secretarygeneral securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform s200839 23 january 2008 united nation general assembly report special committee peacekeeping opera tions working group 2008 substantive session a6219 10 march 4 april 3 july 2008 n 3 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 4 state periodically review reform security sector recognising ssr postconflict challenge module focus context relevant ddr ssr concern n 5 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 6 organisation economic cooperation development security system reform gover nance dac reference document 2005 council european union eu concept esdp support security sector reform ssr council document 12566405 13 october 2005 com mission european community concept european community support security sector reform sec2006 658 24 may 2006 ecowas ecowas conflict prevention framework ecpf enacted regulation mscreg10108 mediation security council ecowas 16 january 2008 united nation security council annex letter dated 20 november 2007 permanent representative slovakia south africa united nation addressed secretarygeneral statement cochairs international work shop enhancing united nation support security sector reform africa towards african perspective s2007687 29 november 2007 n 7 practical guidance supporting parliamentary civil society oversight security sector see born h fluri p johnsson ed parliamentary oversight security sector dcaf interparliamentary union 2003 cole e eppert k kinzelback k ed public oversight security sector dcafundp 2008 n 8 muggah robert ed security postconflict reconstruction dealing fighter math war routledge 2009 n 9 h\u00e4nggi h scherrer v ed 2008 security sector reform un integrated mission experi ence burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo lit verlag m\u00fcnster n 10 oecd dac handbook security system reform supporting security justice provides extensive guidance political technical aspect ssr different phase programme cycle organization economic cooperation development oecd dac hand book security system reform supporting security justice 2007 httpwwwoecdorg dataoecd432538406485pdf n 11 recommended interim report group expert democratic republic congo pursuant security council resolution 1698 2006 s200740 n 12 see undp bcpr 2006 vetting public employee postconflict setting operational guideline n 13 bastick megan valasek kristin ed gender security sector reform toolkit dcaf osce odihr uninstraw 2008 available httpwwwdcafchgendersecuritysectorreform gssrtoolkitcfmnavsub137navsub23nav13 n 14 see greene owen simon rynn linking coordinating ddr ssr human security conflict issue experience priority centre international cooperation security safer world university bradford july 2008 n 15 recent study african security sector network assn provides valuable insight drawn analysis ssr peace agreement 8 state africa asia central america see annex b full detail n 16 see laurent banal vincenza scherrer onub importance local ownership case burundi security sector reform un integrated mission experience burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo ed h h\u00e4nggi v scherrer lit verlag 2008 n 17 un ssr resource may available un interagency taskforce ssr capacity includes guidance resource gap analysis backstopping field operation n 18 united nation report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society s2004616 23 august 2004 para 6 n 19 united nation report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration a60705 2 march 2006 para 9 n 20 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 21 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 22 report secretarygeneral securing peace development page 1 n 23 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 48 n 24 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 50 n 25 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008 n 26 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n 23 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 48", "SentID": 10936 }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196878,16 +196878,16 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50.", + "Sentence": "\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50.", "newParagraph": "1 box included throughout module provide practical example suggestion specific case study box draw four fieldbased case study conducted afghanistan burundi central african republic democratic republic congo support module n 2 see statement president security council 5632nd meeting security council held 20 february 2007 sprst20073 21 february 2007 statement president security council maintenance international peace security role security council humanitarian crisis challenge lesson learned way ahead sprst200530 12 july 2005 united nation report secretarygeneral securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform s200839 23 january 2008 united nation general assembly report special committee peacekeeping opera tions working group 2008 substantive session a6219 10 march 4 april 3 july 2008 n 3 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 4 state periodically review reform security sector recognising ssr postconflict challenge module focus context relevant ddr ssr concern n 5 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 6 organisation economic cooperation development security system reform gover nance dac reference document 2005 council european union eu concept esdp support security sector reform ssr council document 12566405 13 october 2005 com mission european community concept european community support security sector reform sec2006 658 24 may 2006 ecowas ecowas conflict prevention framework ecpf enacted regulation mscreg10108 mediation security council ecowas 16 january 2008 united nation security council annex letter dated 20 november 2007 permanent representative slovakia south africa united nation addressed secretarygeneral statement cochairs international work shop enhancing united nation support security sector reform africa towards african perspective s2007687 29 november 2007 n 7 practical guidance supporting parliamentary civil society oversight security sector see born h fluri p johnsson ed parliamentary oversight security sector dcaf interparliamentary union 2003 cole e eppert k kinzelback k ed public oversight security sector dcafundp 2008 n 8 muggah robert ed security postconflict reconstruction dealing fighter math war routledge 2009 n 9 h\u00e4nggi h scherrer v ed 2008 security sector reform un integrated mission experi ence burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo lit verlag m\u00fcnster n 10 oecd dac handbook security system reform supporting security justice provides extensive guidance political technical aspect ssr different phase programme cycle organization economic cooperation development oecd dac hand book security system reform supporting security justice 2007 httpwwwoecdorg dataoecd432538406485pdf n 11 recommended interim report group expert democratic republic congo pursuant security council resolution 1698 2006 s200740 n 12 see undp bcpr 2006 vetting public employee postconflict setting operational guideline n 13 bastick megan valasek kristin ed gender security sector reform toolkit dcaf osce odihr uninstraw 2008 available httpwwwdcafchgendersecuritysectorreform gssrtoolkitcfmnavsub137navsub23nav13 n 14 see greene owen simon rynn linking coordinating ddr ssr human security conflict issue experience priority centre international cooperation security safer world university bradford july 2008 n 15 recent study african security sector network assn provides valuable insight drawn analysis ssr peace agreement 8 state africa asia central america see annex b full detail n 16 see laurent banal vincenza scherrer onub importance local ownership case burundi security sector reform un integrated mission experience burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo ed h h\u00e4nggi v scherrer lit verlag 2008 n 17 un ssr resource may available un interagency taskforce ssr capacity includes guidance resource gap analysis backstopping field operation n 18 united nation report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society s2004616 23 august 2004 para 6 n 19 united nation report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration a60705 2 march 2006 para 9 n 20 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 21 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 22 report secretarygeneral securing peace development page 1 n 23 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 48 n 24 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 50 n 25 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008 n 26 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n 24 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 50", "SentID": 10937 }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196896,16 +196896,16 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Sentence": "\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "newParagraph": "1 box included throughout module provide practical example suggestion specific case study box draw four fieldbased case study conducted afghanistan burundi central african republic democratic republic congo support module n 2 see statement president security council 5632nd meeting security council held 20 february 2007 sprst20073 21 february 2007 statement president security council maintenance international peace security role security council humanitarian crisis challenge lesson learned way ahead sprst200530 12 july 2005 united nation report secretarygeneral securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform s200839 23 january 2008 united nation general assembly report special committee peacekeeping opera tions working group 2008 substantive session a6219 10 march 4 april 3 july 2008 n 3 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 4 state periodically review reform security sector recognising ssr postconflict challenge module focus context relevant ddr ssr concern n 5 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 6 organisation economic cooperation development security system reform gover nance dac reference document 2005 council european union eu concept esdp support security sector reform ssr council document 12566405 13 october 2005 com mission european community concept european community support security sector reform sec2006 658 24 may 2006 ecowas ecowas conflict prevention framework ecpf enacted regulation mscreg10108 mediation security council ecowas 16 january 2008 united nation security council annex letter dated 20 november 2007 permanent representative slovakia south africa united nation addressed secretarygeneral statement cochairs international work shop enhancing united nation support security sector reform africa towards african perspective s2007687 29 november 2007 n 7 practical guidance supporting parliamentary civil society oversight security sector see born h fluri p johnsson ed parliamentary oversight security sector dcaf interparliamentary union 2003 cole e eppert k kinzelback k ed public oversight security sector dcafundp 2008 n 8 muggah robert ed security postconflict reconstruction dealing fighter math war routledge 2009 n 9 h\u00e4nggi h scherrer v ed 2008 security sector reform un integrated mission experi ence burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo lit verlag m\u00fcnster n 10 oecd dac handbook security system reform supporting security justice provides extensive guidance political technical aspect ssr different phase programme cycle organization economic cooperation development oecd dac hand book security system reform supporting security justice 2007 httpwwwoecdorg dataoecd432538406485pdf n 11 recommended interim report group expert democratic republic congo pursuant security council resolution 1698 2006 s200740 n 12 see undp bcpr 2006 vetting public employee postconflict setting operational guideline n 13 bastick megan valasek kristin ed gender security sector reform toolkit dcaf osce odihr uninstraw 2008 available httpwwwdcafchgendersecuritysectorreform gssrtoolkitcfmnavsub137navsub23nav13 n 14 see greene owen simon rynn linking coordinating ddr ssr human security conflict issue experience priority centre international cooperation security safer world university bradford july 2008 n 15 recent study african security sector network assn provides valuable insight drawn analysis ssr peace agreement 8 state africa asia central america see annex b full detail n 16 see laurent banal vincenza scherrer onub importance local ownership case burundi security sector reform un integrated mission experience burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo ed h h\u00e4nggi v scherrer lit verlag 2008 n 17 un ssr resource may available un interagency taskforce ssr capacity includes guidance resource gap analysis backstopping field operation n 18 united nation report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society s2004616 23 august 2004 para 6 n 19 united nation report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration a60705 2 march 2006 para 9 n 20 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 21 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 22 report secretarygeneral securing peace development page 1 n 23 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 48 n 24 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 50 n 25 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008 n 26 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n 25 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008", "SentID": 10938 }, { "ParagraphID": 3076, - "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \\n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \\n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \\n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \\n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \\n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \\n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \\n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \\n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \\n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \\n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \\n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \\n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \\n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \\n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \\n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \\n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \\n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \\n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \\n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \\n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \\n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \\n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \\n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Paragraph": "1 Boxes included throughout the module provide practical examples and suggestions. Specific case study boxes draw on four field-based case studies conducted in Afghanistan, Burundi, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo in support of this module. \n 2 See: Statement by the President of the Security Council at the 5632nd meeting of the Security Council, held on 20 February 2007, S\/PRST\/2007\/3\/ (21 February 2007); Statement by the President of the Security Council, \u201cThe maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the Security Council in humanitarian crises: challenges, lessons learned and the way ahead,\u201d S\/PRST\/2005\/30, 12 July 2005; United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cSecuring peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform,\u201d S\/2008\/39, 23 January 2008; and, United Nations General Assembly, \u201cReport of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Opera- tions and its Working Group: 2008 substantive session,\u201d A\/62\/19, 10 March \u2013 4 April and 3 July 2008. \n 3 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development, para 17. \n 4 All States periodically review and reform their security sectors. While recognising that SSR is not only a post-conflict challenge, this module focuses on these contexts as most relevant to DDR and SSR concerns. \n 5 Report of the Secretary General, Securing Peace and development. Para 17. \n 6 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cSecurity System Reform and Gover- nance; A DAC Reference Document,\u201d 2005; Council of the European Union, \u201cEU Concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR),\u201d Council document 12566\/4\/05, 13 October 2005; Com- mission of the European Communities, \u201cA Concept for European Community Support for Security Sector Reform,\u201d SEC(2006) 658, 24 May 2006; ECOWAS, \u201cECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework (ECPF),\u201d enacted by Regulation MSC\/REG.1\/01\/08 of the Mediation and Security Council of ECOWAS, 16 January 2008; and, United Nations Security Council, \u201cAnnex to the letter dated 20 November 2007 from the Permanent Representatives of Slovakia and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. Statement of the Co-Chairs of the International Work- shop on Enhancing United Nations Support for Security Sector Reform in Africa: Towards an African Perspective,\u201d S\/2007\/687, 29 November 2007. \n 7 For practical guidance on supporting parliamentary and civil society oversight of the security sector see: Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnsson, A., (eds) Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/ Inter-Parliamentary Union: 2003; Cole, E., Eppert, K and Kinzelback, K., (eds) Public Oversight of the Security Sector, DCAF\/UNDP: 2008. \n 8 Muggah, Robert (ed), \u2018Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the After- math of War\u2019, Routledge: 2009. \n 9 H\u00e4nggi, H & Scherrer, V. (eds.), 2008, \u2018Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experi- ence from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo\u2019, Lit Verlag, M\u00fcnster. \n 10 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice provides extensive guidance on both political and technical aspects of SSR through the different phases of the programme cycle. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, \u201cOECD DAC Hand- book on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice,\u201d 2007: http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/ dataoecd\/43\/25\/38406485.pdf. \n 11 This is recommended in the interim report of the group of experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, pursuant to Security Council resolution 1698 (2006), S\/2007\/40. \n 12 See: UNDP BCPR, (2006) Vetting Public Employees in Post-Conflict Settings: Operational Guidelines. \n 13 Bastick, Megan & Valasek, Kristin (eds). Gender & Security Sector Reform Toolkit, DCAF, OSCE\/ ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW. 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.dcaf.ch\/gender-security-sector-reform\/ gssr-toolkit.cfm?navsub1=37&navsub2=3&nav1=3 \n 14 See: Greene, Owen and Simon Rynn, Linking and Co-ordinating DDR and SSR for Human Security after Conflict: Issues, Experience and Priorities, Centre for International Cooperation and Security, Safer- world and the University of Bradford, July 2008. \n 15 A recent study by the African Security Sector Network (ASSN) provides valuable insights drawn from analysis of SSR in peace agreements in 8 states from Africa, Asia and Central America (see Annex B for full details). \n 16 See Laurent Banal and Vincenza Scherrer, \u2018ONUB and the Importance of Local Ownership: The Case of Burundi\u2019 in Security Sector Reform and UN Integrated Missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, and Kosovo, eds. H. H\u00e4nggi & V. Scherrer, Lit Verlag, 2008. \n 17 UN SSR resources may be available through the UN Inter-Agency Taskforce on SSR. This capacity includes guidance, resources, gap analysis and backstopping to field operations. \n 18 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cThe rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies,\u201d S\/2004\/616, 23 August 2004, Para 6. \n 19 United Nations Report of the Secretary-General, \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration,\u201d A\/60\/705\/, 2 March 2006, Para 9. \n 20 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 21 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2007\/3, 21 February 2007. \n 22 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Page 1. \n 23 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 48. \n 24 Report of the Secretary-General, Securing Peace and Development, Para 50. \n 25 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008. \n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", - "Level": 6.0, + "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", "Title": "DDR and Security Sector Reform", "Module": "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform", @@ -196914,7 +196914,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", + "Sentence": "\n 26 United Nations, \u201cStatement by the President of the Security Council,\u201d S\/PRST\/2008\/14, 12 May 2008.", "newParagraph": "1 box included throughout module provide practical example suggestion specific case study box draw four fieldbased case study conducted afghanistan burundi central african republic democratic republic congo support module n 2 see statement president security council 5632nd meeting security council held 20 february 2007 sprst20073 21 february 2007 statement president security council maintenance international peace security role security council humanitarian crisis challenge lesson learned way ahead sprst200530 12 july 2005 united nation report secretarygeneral securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform s200839 23 january 2008 united nation general assembly report special committee peacekeeping opera tions working group 2008 substantive session a6219 10 march 4 april 3 july 2008 n 3 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 4 state periodically review reform security sector recognising ssr postconflict challenge module focus context relevant ddr ssr concern n 5 report secretary general securing peace development para 17 n 6 organisation economic cooperation development security system reform gover nance dac reference document 2005 council european union eu concept esdp support security sector reform ssr council document 12566405 13 october 2005 com mission european community concept european community support security sector reform sec2006 658 24 may 2006 ecowas ecowas conflict prevention framework ecpf enacted regulation mscreg10108 mediation security council ecowas 16 january 2008 united nation security council annex letter dated 20 november 2007 permanent representative slovakia south africa united nation addressed secretarygeneral statement cochairs international work shop enhancing united nation support security sector reform africa towards african perspective s2007687 29 november 2007 n 7 practical guidance supporting parliamentary civil society oversight security sector see born h fluri p johnsson ed parliamentary oversight security sector dcaf interparliamentary union 2003 cole e eppert k kinzelback k ed public oversight security sector dcafundp 2008 n 8 muggah robert ed security postconflict reconstruction dealing fighter math war routledge 2009 n 9 h\u00e4nggi h scherrer v ed 2008 security sector reform un integrated mission experi ence burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo lit verlag m\u00fcnster n 10 oecd dac handbook security system reform supporting security justice provides extensive guidance political technical aspect ssr different phase programme cycle organization economic cooperation development oecd dac hand book security system reform supporting security justice 2007 httpwwwoecdorg dataoecd432538406485pdf n 11 recommended interim report group expert democratic republic congo pursuant security council resolution 1698 2006 s200740 n 12 see undp bcpr 2006 vetting public employee postconflict setting operational guideline n 13 bastick megan valasek kristin ed gender security sector reform toolkit dcaf osce odihr uninstraw 2008 available httpwwwdcafchgendersecuritysectorreform gssrtoolkitcfmnavsub137navsub23nav13 n 14 see greene owen simon rynn linking coordinating ddr ssr human security conflict issue experience priority centre international cooperation security safer world university bradford july 2008 n 15 recent study african security sector network assn provides valuable insight drawn analysis ssr peace agreement 8 state africa asia central america see annex b full detail n 16 see laurent banal vincenza scherrer onub importance local ownership case burundi security sector reform un integrated mission experience burundi democratic republic congo haiti kosovo ed h h\u00e4nggi v scherrer lit verlag 2008 n 17 un ssr resource may available un interagency taskforce ssr capacity includes guidance resource gap analysis backstopping field operation n 18 united nation report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society s2004616 23 august 2004 para 6 n 19 united nation report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration a60705 2 march 2006 para 9 n 20 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 21 united nation statement president security council sprst20073 21 february 2007 n 22 report secretarygeneral securing peace development page 1 n 23 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 48 n 24 report secretarygeneral securing peace development para 50 n 25 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008 n 26 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n 26 united nation statement president security council sprst200814 12 may 2008", "SentID": 10939 @@ -197065,7 +197065,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3080, - "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -197083,7 +197083,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3080, - "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -197101,7 +197101,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3080, - "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -197119,7 +197119,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3080, - "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -197130,7 +197130,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "newParagraph": "annex contains list term definition abbreviation used standard com plete glossary term definition abbreviation used series integrated ddr standard iddrs given iddrs 120 iddrs series word shall may must used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "ProcessedSent": "use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "SentID": 10951 @@ -197407,7 +197407,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3085, - "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \\n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \\n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \\n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \\n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", + "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -197418,14 +197418,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \\n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice.", + "Sentence": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice.", "newParagraph": "box 1 primary approach transitional justice n prosecution conduct investigation judicial proceeding alleged perpetrator crime accordance international standard administration justice purpose module focus prosecution individual accused criminal conduct involving gross violation international human right law serious violation international humanitarian law violation international criminal law prosecution initiative vary broad scope aiming try many perpetrator narrowly focused bear responsibility crime committed n reparation set measure provides redress victim gross violation international human right law serious violation international humanitarian law violation international criminal law reparation take form restitution compensation rehabilitation satisfaction guarantee nonrepetition reparation program two goal first provide recognition victim reparation explicitly primarily carried behalf victim second encourage trust among citizen citizen state demonstrating past abuse regarded seriously new government n truth commission nonjudicial quasijudicial factfinding body primary purpose investigating reporting past abuse attempt understand extent pattern past violation well cause consequence work commission help society understand acknowledge contested denied history bring voice story victim public large also aim preventing abuse truth commission official local national conduct investigation hearing identify individual institution responsible abuse truth commission also empowered make policy prosecutorial recommendation n institutional reform changing public institution including may perpetuated conflict served repressive regime transforming institution effective accountable thus better able support transition sustain peace preserve rule law following period massive human right abuse building fair efficient public institution play critical role preventing future abuse also enables public institution particular security justice sector provide criminal accountability past abuse", "ProcessedSent": "box 1 primary approach transitional justice n prosecution conduct investigation judicial proceeding alleged perpetrator crime accordance international standard administration justice", "SentID": 10967 }, { "ParagraphID": 3085, - "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \\n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \\n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \\n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \\n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", + "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -197443,7 +197443,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3085, - "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \\n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \\n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \\n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \\n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", + "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -197461,7 +197461,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3085, - "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \\n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \\n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \\n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \\n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", + "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -197479,7 +197479,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3085, - "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \\n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \\n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \\n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \\n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", + "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -197490,14 +197490,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law.", + "Sentence": "\n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law.", "newParagraph": "box 1 primary approach transitional justice n prosecution conduct investigation judicial proceeding alleged perpetrator crime accordance international standard administration justice purpose module focus prosecution individual accused criminal conduct involving gross violation international human right law serious violation international humanitarian law violation international criminal law prosecution initiative vary broad scope aiming try many perpetrator narrowly focused bear responsibility crime committed n reparation set measure provides redress victim gross violation international human right law serious violation international humanitarian law violation international criminal law reparation take form restitution compensation rehabilitation satisfaction guarantee nonrepetition reparation program two goal first provide recognition victim reparation explicitly primarily carried behalf victim second encourage trust among citizen citizen state demonstrating past abuse regarded seriously new government n truth commission nonjudicial quasijudicial factfinding body primary purpose investigating reporting past abuse attempt understand extent pattern past violation well cause consequence work commission help society understand acknowledge contested denied history bring voice story victim public large also aim preventing abuse truth commission official local national conduct investigation hearing identify individual institution responsible abuse truth commission also empowered make policy prosecutorial recommendation n institutional reform changing public institution including may perpetuated conflict served repressive regime transforming institution effective accountable thus better able support transition sustain peace preserve rule law following period massive human right abuse building fair efficient public institution play critical role preventing future abuse also enables public institution particular security justice sector provide criminal accountability past abuse", "ProcessedSent": "n reparation set measure provides redress victim gross violation international human right law serious violation international humanitarian law violation international criminal law", "SentID": 10971 }, { "ParagraphID": 3085, - "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \\n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \\n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \\n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \\n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", + "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -197515,7 +197515,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3085, - "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \\n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \\n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \\n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \\n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", + "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -197533,7 +197533,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3085, - "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \\n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \\n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \\n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \\n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", + "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -197544,14 +197544,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies.", + "Sentence": "\n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies.", "newParagraph": "box 1 primary approach transitional justice n prosecution conduct investigation judicial proceeding alleged perpetrator crime accordance international standard administration justice purpose module focus prosecution individual accused criminal conduct involving gross violation international human right law serious violation international humanitarian law violation international criminal law prosecution initiative vary broad scope aiming try many perpetrator narrowly focused bear responsibility crime committed n reparation set measure provides redress victim gross violation international human right law serious violation international humanitarian law violation international criminal law reparation take form restitution compensation rehabilitation satisfaction guarantee nonrepetition reparation program two goal first provide recognition victim reparation explicitly primarily carried behalf victim second encourage trust among citizen citizen state demonstrating past abuse regarded seriously new government n truth commission nonjudicial quasijudicial factfinding body primary purpose investigating reporting past abuse attempt understand extent pattern past violation well cause consequence work commission help society understand acknowledge contested denied history bring voice story victim public large also aim preventing abuse truth commission official local national conduct investigation hearing identify individual institution responsible abuse truth commission also empowered make policy prosecutorial recommendation n institutional reform changing public institution including may perpetuated conflict served repressive regime transforming institution effective accountable thus better able support transition sustain peace preserve rule law following period massive human right abuse building fair efficient public institution play critical role preventing future abuse also enables public institution particular security justice sector provide criminal accountability past abuse", "ProcessedSent": "n truth commission nonjudicial quasijudicial factfinding body", "SentID": 10974 }, { "ParagraphID": 3085, - "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \\n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \\n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \\n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \\n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", + "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -197569,7 +197569,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3085, - "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \\n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \\n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \\n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \\n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", + "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -197587,7 +197587,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3085, - "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \\n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \\n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \\n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \\n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", + "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -197605,7 +197605,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3085, - "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \\n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \\n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \\n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \\n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", + "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -197623,7 +197623,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3085, - "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \\n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \\n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \\n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \\n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", + "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -197641,7 +197641,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3085, - "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \\n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \\n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \\n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \\n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", + "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -197659,7 +197659,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3085, - "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \\n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \\n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \\n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \\n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", + "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -197670,14 +197670,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law.", + "Sentence": "\n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law.", "newParagraph": "box 1 primary approach transitional justice n prosecution conduct investigation judicial proceeding alleged perpetrator crime accordance international standard administration justice purpose module focus prosecution individual accused criminal conduct involving gross violation international human right law serious violation international humanitarian law violation international criminal law prosecution initiative vary broad scope aiming try many perpetrator narrowly focused bear responsibility crime committed n reparation set measure provides redress victim gross violation international human right law serious violation international humanitarian law violation international criminal law reparation take form restitution compensation rehabilitation satisfaction guarantee nonrepetition reparation program two goal first provide recognition victim reparation explicitly primarily carried behalf victim second encourage trust among citizen citizen state demonstrating past abuse regarded seriously new government n truth commission nonjudicial quasijudicial factfinding body primary purpose investigating reporting past abuse attempt understand extent pattern past violation well cause consequence work commission help society understand acknowledge contested denied history bring voice story victim public large also aim preventing abuse truth commission official local national conduct investigation hearing identify individual institution responsible abuse truth commission also empowered make policy prosecutorial recommendation n institutional reform changing public institution including may perpetuated conflict served repressive regime transforming institution effective accountable thus better able support transition sustain peace preserve rule law following period massive human right abuse building fair efficient public institution play critical role preventing future abuse also enables public institution particular security justice sector provide criminal accountability past abuse", "ProcessedSent": "n institutional reform changing public institution including may perpetuated conflict served repressive regime transforming institution effective accountable thus better able support transition sustain peace preserve rule law", "SentID": 10981 }, { "ParagraphID": 3085, - "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \\n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \\n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \\n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \\n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", + "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -197695,7 +197695,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3085, - "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \\n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \\n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \\n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \\n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", + "Paragraph": "Box 1 Primary approaches to transitional justice \n Prosecutions \u2013 are the conduct of investigations and judicial proceedings against an alleged perpetrator of a crime in accordance with international standards for the administration of justice. For the purposes of this module, the focus is on the prosecution of individuals accused of criminal conduct involving gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Prosecutions initiatives can vary. They can be broad in scope, aiming to try many perpetrators, or they can be narrowly focused on those that bear the most responsibility for the crimes committed. \n Reparations \u2013 are a set of measures that provides redress for victims of gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and violations of international criminal law. Reparations can take the form of restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Reparations programs have two goals: first, to provide recognition for victims because reparation are explicitly and primarily carried out on behalf of victims; and, second, to encourage trust among citizens, and between citizens and the state, by demonstrating that past abuses are regarded seriously by the new government. \n Truth commissions \u2013 are non-judicial or quasi-judicial fact-finding bodies. They have the primary purpose of investigating and reporting on past abuses in an attempt to understand the extent and patterns of past violations, as well as their causes and consequences. The work of a commission is to help a society understand and acknowledge a contested or denied history, and bring the voices and stories of victims to the public at large. It also aims at preventing further abuses. Truth commissions can be official, local or national. They can conduct investigations and hearings, and can identify the individuals and institutions responsible for abuse. Truth commissions can also be empowered to make policy and prosecutorial recommendations. \n Institutional reform \u2013 is changing public institutions, including those that may have perpetuated a conflict or served a repressive regime, and transforming them into institutions that are more effective and accountable and thus better able to support the transition, sustain peace and preserve the rule of law. Following a period of massive human rights abuse, building fair and efficient public institutions play a critical role in preventing future abuses. It also enables public institutions, in particular in the security and justice sectors, to provide criminal accountability for past abuses.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -198775,7 +198775,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3102, - "Paragraph": "Do no harm: A first step in creating a constructive relationship between DDR and transitional justice is to understand how transitional justice and DDR can interact in ways that, at a minimum, do not obstruct their respective objectives of accountability and reconciliation and maintenance of peace and security. \\n Balanced approaches: While the imperative to maintain peace and security often de- mands a specific focus on ex-combatants in the short-term, long-term strategies should aim to provide reintegration opportunities to all war-affected populations, including victims.22 \\n Respect for international human rights law: DDR programmes shall respect and promote international human rights law. This includes supporting ways of preventing reprisal or discrimination against, or stigmatization of those who participate in DDR programmes as well as to protect the rights of the communities that are asked to receive ex-combatants, and members of the society at large. DDR processes shall provide for a commitment to gender, age and disability specific principles and shall comply with principles of non-discrimination. \\n Respect for international humanitarian law: DDR programmes shall respect and promote international humanitarian law, including the humane treatment of persons no longer actively engaged in combat. United Nations Peacekeeping Forces, includ- ing military members involved in administrative DDR programmes, are also subject to the fundamental principles and rules of international humanitarian law, and in cases of violation, are subject to prosecution in their national courts.23", + "Paragraph": "Do no harm: A first step in creating a constructive relationship between DDR and transitional justice is to understand how transitional justice and DDR can interact in ways that, at a minimum, do not obstruct their respective objectives of accountability and reconciliation and maintenance of peace and security. \n Balanced approaches: While the imperative to maintain peace and security often de- mands a specific focus on ex-combatants in the short-term, long-term strategies should aim to provide reintegration opportunities to all war-affected populations, including victims.22 \n Respect for international human rights law: DDR programmes shall respect and promote international human rights law. This includes supporting ways of preventing reprisal or discrimination against, or stigmatization of those who participate in DDR programmes as well as to protect the rights of the communities that are asked to receive ex-combatants, and members of the society at large. DDR processes shall provide for a commitment to gender, age and disability specific principles and shall comply with principles of non-discrimination. \n Respect for international humanitarian law: DDR programmes shall respect and promote international humanitarian law, including the humane treatment of persons no longer actively engaged in combat. United Nations Peacekeeping Forces, includ- ing military members involved in administrative DDR programmes, are also subject to the fundamental principles and rules of international humanitarian law, and in cases of violation, are subject to prosecution in their national courts.23", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -198793,7 +198793,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3102, - "Paragraph": "Do no harm: A first step in creating a constructive relationship between DDR and transitional justice is to understand how transitional justice and DDR can interact in ways that, at a minimum, do not obstruct their respective objectives of accountability and reconciliation and maintenance of peace and security. \\n Balanced approaches: While the imperative to maintain peace and security often de- mands a specific focus on ex-combatants in the short-term, long-term strategies should aim to provide reintegration opportunities to all war-affected populations, including victims.22 \\n Respect for international human rights law: DDR programmes shall respect and promote international human rights law. This includes supporting ways of preventing reprisal or discrimination against, or stigmatization of those who participate in DDR programmes as well as to protect the rights of the communities that are asked to receive ex-combatants, and members of the society at large. DDR processes shall provide for a commitment to gender, age and disability specific principles and shall comply with principles of non-discrimination. \\n Respect for international humanitarian law: DDR programmes shall respect and promote international humanitarian law, including the humane treatment of persons no longer actively engaged in combat. United Nations Peacekeeping Forces, includ- ing military members involved in administrative DDR programmes, are also subject to the fundamental principles and rules of international humanitarian law, and in cases of violation, are subject to prosecution in their national courts.23", + "Paragraph": "Do no harm: A first step in creating a constructive relationship between DDR and transitional justice is to understand how transitional justice and DDR can interact in ways that, at a minimum, do not obstruct their respective objectives of accountability and reconciliation and maintenance of peace and security. \n Balanced approaches: While the imperative to maintain peace and security often de- mands a specific focus on ex-combatants in the short-term, long-term strategies should aim to provide reintegration opportunities to all war-affected populations, including victims.22 \n Respect for international human rights law: DDR programmes shall respect and promote international human rights law. This includes supporting ways of preventing reprisal or discrimination against, or stigmatization of those who participate in DDR programmes as well as to protect the rights of the communities that are asked to receive ex-combatants, and members of the society at large. DDR processes shall provide for a commitment to gender, age and disability specific principles and shall comply with principles of non-discrimination. \n Respect for international humanitarian law: DDR programmes shall respect and promote international humanitarian law, including the humane treatment of persons no longer actively engaged in combat. United Nations Peacekeeping Forces, includ- ing military members involved in administrative DDR programmes, are also subject to the fundamental principles and rules of international humanitarian law, and in cases of violation, are subject to prosecution in their national courts.23", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -198804,14 +198804,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Balanced approaches: While the imperative to maintain peace and security often de- mands a specific focus on ex-combatants in the short-term, long-term strategies should aim to provide reintegration opportunities to all war-affected populations, including victims.22 \\n Respect for international human rights law: DDR programmes shall respect and promote international human rights law.", + "Sentence": "\n Balanced approaches: While the imperative to maintain peace and security often de- mands a specific focus on ex-combatants in the short-term, long-term strategies should aim to provide reintegration opportunities to all war-affected populations, including victims.22 \n Respect for international human rights law: DDR programmes shall respect and promote international human rights law.", "newParagraph": "harm first step creating constructive relationship ddr transitional justice understand transitional justice ddr interact way minimum obstruct respective objective accountability reconciliation maintenance peace security n balanced approach imperative maintain peace security often de mands specific focus excombatants shortterm longterm strategy aim provide reintegration opportunity waraffected population including victims22 n respect international human right law ddr programme shall respect promote international human right law includes supporting way preventing reprisal discrimination stigmatization participate ddr programme well protect right community asked receive excombatants member society large ddr process shall provide commitment gender age disability specific principle shall comply principle nondiscrimination n respect international humanitarian law ddr programme shall respect promote international humanitarian law including humane treatment person longer actively engaged combat united nation peacekeeping force includ ing military member involved administrative ddr programme also subject fundamental principle rule international humanitarian law case violation subject prosecution national courts23", "ProcessedSent": "n balanced approach imperative maintain peace security often de mands specific focus excombatants shortterm longterm strategy aim provide reintegration opportunity waraffected population including victims22 n respect international human right law ddr programme shall respect promote international human right law", "SentID": 11044 }, { "ParagraphID": 3102, - "Paragraph": "Do no harm: A first step in creating a constructive relationship between DDR and transitional justice is to understand how transitional justice and DDR can interact in ways that, at a minimum, do not obstruct their respective objectives of accountability and reconciliation and maintenance of peace and security. \\n Balanced approaches: While the imperative to maintain peace and security often de- mands a specific focus on ex-combatants in the short-term, long-term strategies should aim to provide reintegration opportunities to all war-affected populations, including victims.22 \\n Respect for international human rights law: DDR programmes shall respect and promote international human rights law. This includes supporting ways of preventing reprisal or discrimination against, or stigmatization of those who participate in DDR programmes as well as to protect the rights of the communities that are asked to receive ex-combatants, and members of the society at large. DDR processes shall provide for a commitment to gender, age and disability specific principles and shall comply with principles of non-discrimination. \\n Respect for international humanitarian law: DDR programmes shall respect and promote international humanitarian law, including the humane treatment of persons no longer actively engaged in combat. United Nations Peacekeeping Forces, includ- ing military members involved in administrative DDR programmes, are also subject to the fundamental principles and rules of international humanitarian law, and in cases of violation, are subject to prosecution in their national courts.23", + "Paragraph": "Do no harm: A first step in creating a constructive relationship between DDR and transitional justice is to understand how transitional justice and DDR can interact in ways that, at a minimum, do not obstruct their respective objectives of accountability and reconciliation and maintenance of peace and security. \n Balanced approaches: While the imperative to maintain peace and security often de- mands a specific focus on ex-combatants in the short-term, long-term strategies should aim to provide reintegration opportunities to all war-affected populations, including victims.22 \n Respect for international human rights law: DDR programmes shall respect and promote international human rights law. This includes supporting ways of preventing reprisal or discrimination against, or stigmatization of those who participate in DDR programmes as well as to protect the rights of the communities that are asked to receive ex-combatants, and members of the society at large. DDR processes shall provide for a commitment to gender, age and disability specific principles and shall comply with principles of non-discrimination. \n Respect for international humanitarian law: DDR programmes shall respect and promote international humanitarian law, including the humane treatment of persons no longer actively engaged in combat. United Nations Peacekeeping Forces, includ- ing military members involved in administrative DDR programmes, are also subject to the fundamental principles and rules of international humanitarian law, and in cases of violation, are subject to prosecution in their national courts.23", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -198829,7 +198829,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3102, - "Paragraph": "Do no harm: A first step in creating a constructive relationship between DDR and transitional justice is to understand how transitional justice and DDR can interact in ways that, at a minimum, do not obstruct their respective objectives of accountability and reconciliation and maintenance of peace and security. \\n Balanced approaches: While the imperative to maintain peace and security often de- mands a specific focus on ex-combatants in the short-term, long-term strategies should aim to provide reintegration opportunities to all war-affected populations, including victims.22 \\n Respect for international human rights law: DDR programmes shall respect and promote international human rights law. This includes supporting ways of preventing reprisal or discrimination against, or stigmatization of those who participate in DDR programmes as well as to protect the rights of the communities that are asked to receive ex-combatants, and members of the society at large. DDR processes shall provide for a commitment to gender, age and disability specific principles and shall comply with principles of non-discrimination. \\n Respect for international humanitarian law: DDR programmes shall respect and promote international humanitarian law, including the humane treatment of persons no longer actively engaged in combat. United Nations Peacekeeping Forces, includ- ing military members involved in administrative DDR programmes, are also subject to the fundamental principles and rules of international humanitarian law, and in cases of violation, are subject to prosecution in their national courts.23", + "Paragraph": "Do no harm: A first step in creating a constructive relationship between DDR and transitional justice is to understand how transitional justice and DDR can interact in ways that, at a minimum, do not obstruct their respective objectives of accountability and reconciliation and maintenance of peace and security. \n Balanced approaches: While the imperative to maintain peace and security often de- mands a specific focus on ex-combatants in the short-term, long-term strategies should aim to provide reintegration opportunities to all war-affected populations, including victims.22 \n Respect for international human rights law: DDR programmes shall respect and promote international human rights law. This includes supporting ways of preventing reprisal or discrimination against, or stigmatization of those who participate in DDR programmes as well as to protect the rights of the communities that are asked to receive ex-combatants, and members of the society at large. DDR processes shall provide for a commitment to gender, age and disability specific principles and shall comply with principles of non-discrimination. \n Respect for international humanitarian law: DDR programmes shall respect and promote international humanitarian law, including the humane treatment of persons no longer actively engaged in combat. United Nations Peacekeeping Forces, includ- ing military members involved in administrative DDR programmes, are also subject to the fundamental principles and rules of international humanitarian law, and in cases of violation, are subject to prosecution in their national courts.23", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -198847,7 +198847,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3102, - "Paragraph": "Do no harm: A first step in creating a constructive relationship between DDR and transitional justice is to understand how transitional justice and DDR can interact in ways that, at a minimum, do not obstruct their respective objectives of accountability and reconciliation and maintenance of peace and security. \\n Balanced approaches: While the imperative to maintain peace and security often de- mands a specific focus on ex-combatants in the short-term, long-term strategies should aim to provide reintegration opportunities to all war-affected populations, including victims.22 \\n Respect for international human rights law: DDR programmes shall respect and promote international human rights law. This includes supporting ways of preventing reprisal or discrimination against, or stigmatization of those who participate in DDR programmes as well as to protect the rights of the communities that are asked to receive ex-combatants, and members of the society at large. DDR processes shall provide for a commitment to gender, age and disability specific principles and shall comply with principles of non-discrimination. \\n Respect for international humanitarian law: DDR programmes shall respect and promote international humanitarian law, including the humane treatment of persons no longer actively engaged in combat. United Nations Peacekeeping Forces, includ- ing military members involved in administrative DDR programmes, are also subject to the fundamental principles and rules of international humanitarian law, and in cases of violation, are subject to prosecution in their national courts.23", + "Paragraph": "Do no harm: A first step in creating a constructive relationship between DDR and transitional justice is to understand how transitional justice and DDR can interact in ways that, at a minimum, do not obstruct their respective objectives of accountability and reconciliation and maintenance of peace and security. \n Balanced approaches: While the imperative to maintain peace and security often de- mands a specific focus on ex-combatants in the short-term, long-term strategies should aim to provide reintegration opportunities to all war-affected populations, including victims.22 \n Respect for international human rights law: DDR programmes shall respect and promote international human rights law. This includes supporting ways of preventing reprisal or discrimination against, or stigmatization of those who participate in DDR programmes as well as to protect the rights of the communities that are asked to receive ex-combatants, and members of the society at large. DDR processes shall provide for a commitment to gender, age and disability specific principles and shall comply with principles of non-discrimination. \n Respect for international humanitarian law: DDR programmes shall respect and promote international humanitarian law, including the humane treatment of persons no longer actively engaged in combat. United Nations Peacekeeping Forces, includ- ing military members involved in administrative DDR programmes, are also subject to the fundamental principles and rules of international humanitarian law, and in cases of violation, are subject to prosecution in their national courts.23", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -198858,14 +198858,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Respect for international humanitarian law: DDR programmes shall respect and promote international humanitarian law, including the humane treatment of persons no longer actively engaged in combat.", + "Sentence": "\n Respect for international humanitarian law: DDR programmes shall respect and promote international humanitarian law, including the humane treatment of persons no longer actively engaged in combat.", "newParagraph": "harm first step creating constructive relationship ddr transitional justice understand transitional justice ddr interact way minimum obstruct respective objective accountability reconciliation maintenance peace security n balanced approach imperative maintain peace security often de mands specific focus excombatants shortterm longterm strategy aim provide reintegration opportunity waraffected population including victims22 n respect international human right law ddr programme shall respect promote international human right law includes supporting way preventing reprisal discrimination stigmatization participate ddr programme well protect right community asked receive excombatants member society large ddr process shall provide commitment gender age disability specific principle shall comply principle nondiscrimination n respect international humanitarian law ddr programme shall respect promote international humanitarian law including humane treatment person longer actively engaged combat united nation peacekeeping force includ ing military member involved administrative ddr programme also subject fundamental principle rule international humanitarian law case violation subject prosecution national courts23", "ProcessedSent": "n respect international humanitarian law ddr programme shall respect promote international humanitarian law including humane treatment person longer actively engaged combat", "SentID": 11047 }, { "ParagraphID": 3102, - "Paragraph": "Do no harm: A first step in creating a constructive relationship between DDR and transitional justice is to understand how transitional justice and DDR can interact in ways that, at a minimum, do not obstruct their respective objectives of accountability and reconciliation and maintenance of peace and security. \\n Balanced approaches: While the imperative to maintain peace and security often de- mands a specific focus on ex-combatants in the short-term, long-term strategies should aim to provide reintegration opportunities to all war-affected populations, including victims.22 \\n Respect for international human rights law: DDR programmes shall respect and promote international human rights law. This includes supporting ways of preventing reprisal or discrimination against, or stigmatization of those who participate in DDR programmes as well as to protect the rights of the communities that are asked to receive ex-combatants, and members of the society at large. DDR processes shall provide for a commitment to gender, age and disability specific principles and shall comply with principles of non-discrimination. \\n Respect for international humanitarian law: DDR programmes shall respect and promote international humanitarian law, including the humane treatment of persons no longer actively engaged in combat. United Nations Peacekeeping Forces, includ- ing military members involved in administrative DDR programmes, are also subject to the fundamental principles and rules of international humanitarian law, and in cases of violation, are subject to prosecution in their national courts.23", + "Paragraph": "Do no harm: A first step in creating a constructive relationship between DDR and transitional justice is to understand how transitional justice and DDR can interact in ways that, at a minimum, do not obstruct their respective objectives of accountability and reconciliation and maintenance of peace and security. \n Balanced approaches: While the imperative to maintain peace and security often de- mands a specific focus on ex-combatants in the short-term, long-term strategies should aim to provide reintegration opportunities to all war-affected populations, including victims.22 \n Respect for international human rights law: DDR programmes shall respect and promote international human rights law. This includes supporting ways of preventing reprisal or discrimination against, or stigmatization of those who participate in DDR programmes as well as to protect the rights of the communities that are asked to receive ex-combatants, and members of the society at large. DDR processes shall provide for a commitment to gender, age and disability specific principles and shall comply with principles of non-discrimination. \n Respect for international humanitarian law: DDR programmes shall respect and promote international humanitarian law, including the humane treatment of persons no longer actively engaged in combat. United Nations Peacekeeping Forces, includ- ing military members involved in administrative DDR programmes, are also subject to the fundamental principles and rules of international humanitarian law, and in cases of violation, are subject to prosecution in their national courts.23", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -199693,7 +199693,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3113, - "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \\n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \\n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \\n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \\n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \\n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \\n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", + "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -199704,14 +199704,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2. Truth commissions", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \\n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal.", + "Sentence": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal.", "newParagraph": "box 2 sierra leone case study ddr context hybrid tribunal truth reconciliation commission n post conflict situation sierra leone distinctive ddr process national transitional justice initiative implemented closely coexistence truth commission criminal tribunal lom\u00e9 peace agreement stipulated mandate ddr truth reconciliation commission trc formal link however made two process peace document practice disarmament demobilization largely successful sierra leone yet research suggests lack accountability negative impact reintegration certain excombatants excombatants armed faction known committed abuse civilian population faced difficulty reintegration others n lom\u00e9 accord 1999 included cessation hostility initiation ddr program inclusion rebel force revolutionary united front ruf government blanket amnesty combatant ddr fighter signing accord representative secretary general united nation un peace negotiation included disclaimer stating un understood amnesty pardon provided agreement would cover international crime genocide crime humanity serious crime international humanitarian law active effort civil society leader sierra leone well international advocate lom\u00e9 accord also mandated truth reconciliation commission human right commission n progress made lom\u00e9 shattered may 2000 fighting resumed capital city freetown peace process put back track reinforcement un peacekeeping mission increased mediation effort resulting signing abuja protocol 2001 abuja protocol also marked abrupt change national approach accountability justice government formally requested un assistance establish court try member ruf involved war crime un supported initiative special court sierra leone scsl set august 2002 mandate try bear greatest responsibility atrocity committed sierra leone n ddr closing phase scsl trc established party lom\u00e9 peace agreement including national government ruf backed establishment trc began operation 2002 scsl stoked fear among excombatants possible criminal prosecution great deal hope trc would provide effective essential mechanism promoting reconciliation n although first concurrence tribunal truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding civil society effort provide information excombatants successful increasing latter understanding separate mandate institution support trc amongst excombatants rose 53 85 per cent excombatants understood design purpose believed would bring reconciliation rose 52 84 per cent excombatants admitted human right violation trc offered opportunity take responsibility action according one report want confess trc think enable return community n excerpted gibril sesay mohamed suma ddr transitional justice sierra leone case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n jeremy weinstein macartan humphreys disentangling determinant successful demobilization reintegration working paper 69 washington dc center global development 2005 n postconflict reintegration initiative development empowerment pride ictj excombatants view truth reconciliation commission special court sierra leone september 2002 httpwwwictjorgenwhereregion1141html", "ProcessedSent": "box 2 sierra leone case study ddr context hybrid tribunal truth reconciliation commission n post conflict situation sierra leone distinctive ddr process national transitional justice initiative implemented closely coexistence truth commission criminal tribunal", "SentID": 11094 }, { "ParagraphID": 3113, - "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \\n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \\n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \\n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \\n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \\n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \\n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", + "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -199729,7 +199729,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3113, - "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \\n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \\n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \\n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \\n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \\n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \\n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", + "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -199747,7 +199747,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3113, - "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \\n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \\n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \\n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \\n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \\n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \\n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", + "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -199765,7 +199765,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3113, - "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \\n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \\n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \\n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \\n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \\n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \\n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", + "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -199776,14 +199776,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2. Truth commissions", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "** \\n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters.", + "Sentence": "** \n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters.", "newParagraph": "box 2 sierra leone case study ddr context hybrid tribunal truth reconciliation commission n post conflict situation sierra leone distinctive ddr process national transitional justice initiative implemented closely coexistence truth commission criminal tribunal lom\u00e9 peace agreement stipulated mandate ddr truth reconciliation commission trc formal link however made two process peace document practice disarmament demobilization largely successful sierra leone yet research suggests lack accountability negative impact reintegration certain excombatants excombatants armed faction known committed abuse civilian population faced difficulty reintegration others n lom\u00e9 accord 1999 included cessation hostility initiation ddr program inclusion rebel force revolutionary united front ruf government blanket amnesty combatant ddr fighter signing accord representative secretary general united nation un peace negotiation included disclaimer stating un understood amnesty pardon provided agreement would cover international crime genocide crime humanity serious crime international humanitarian law active effort civil society leader sierra leone well international advocate lom\u00e9 accord also mandated truth reconciliation commission human right commission n progress made lom\u00e9 shattered may 2000 fighting resumed capital city freetown peace process put back track reinforcement un peacekeeping mission increased mediation effort resulting signing abuja protocol 2001 abuja protocol also marked abrupt change national approach accountability justice government formally requested un assistance establish court try member ruf involved war crime un supported initiative special court sierra leone scsl set august 2002 mandate try bear greatest responsibility atrocity committed sierra leone n ddr closing phase scsl trc established party lom\u00e9 peace agreement including national government ruf backed establishment trc began operation 2002 scsl stoked fear among excombatants possible criminal prosecution great deal hope trc would provide effective essential mechanism promoting reconciliation n although first concurrence tribunal truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding civil society effort provide information excombatants successful increasing latter understanding separate mandate institution support trc amongst excombatants rose 53 85 per cent excombatants understood design purpose believed would bring reconciliation rose 52 84 per cent excombatants admitted human right violation trc offered opportunity take responsibility action according one report want confess trc think enable return community n excerpted gibril sesay mohamed suma ddr transitional justice sierra leone case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n jeremy weinstein macartan humphreys disentangling determinant successful demobilization reintegration working paper 69 washington dc center global development 2005 n postconflict reintegration initiative development empowerment pride ictj excombatants view truth reconciliation commission special court sierra leone september 2002 httpwwwictjorgenwhereregion1141html", "ProcessedSent": " n lom\u00e9 accord 1999 included cessation hostility initiation ddr program inclusion rebel force revolutionary united front ruf government blanket amnesty combatant ddr fighter", "SentID": 11098 }, { "ParagraphID": 3113, - "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \\n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \\n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \\n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \\n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \\n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \\n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", + "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -199801,7 +199801,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3113, - "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \\n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \\n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \\n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \\n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \\n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \\n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", + "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -199819,7 +199819,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3113, - "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \\n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \\n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \\n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \\n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \\n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \\n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", + "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -199830,14 +199830,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2. Truth commissions", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown.", + "Sentence": "\n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown.", "newParagraph": "box 2 sierra leone case study ddr context hybrid tribunal truth reconciliation commission n post conflict situation sierra leone distinctive ddr process national transitional justice initiative implemented closely coexistence truth commission criminal tribunal lom\u00e9 peace agreement stipulated mandate ddr truth reconciliation commission trc formal link however made two process peace document practice disarmament demobilization largely successful sierra leone yet research suggests lack accountability negative impact reintegration certain excombatants excombatants armed faction known committed abuse civilian population faced difficulty reintegration others n lom\u00e9 accord 1999 included cessation hostility initiation ddr program inclusion rebel force revolutionary united front ruf government blanket amnesty combatant ddr fighter signing accord representative secretary general united nation un peace negotiation included disclaimer stating un understood amnesty pardon provided agreement would cover international crime genocide crime humanity serious crime international humanitarian law active effort civil society leader sierra leone well international advocate lom\u00e9 accord also mandated truth reconciliation commission human right commission n progress made lom\u00e9 shattered may 2000 fighting resumed capital city freetown peace process put back track reinforcement un peacekeeping mission increased mediation effort resulting signing abuja protocol 2001 abuja protocol also marked abrupt change national approach accountability justice government formally requested un assistance establish court try member ruf involved war crime un supported initiative special court sierra leone scsl set august 2002 mandate try bear greatest responsibility atrocity committed sierra leone n ddr closing phase scsl trc established party lom\u00e9 peace agreement including national government ruf backed establishment trc began operation 2002 scsl stoked fear among excombatants possible criminal prosecution great deal hope trc would provide effective essential mechanism promoting reconciliation n although first concurrence tribunal truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding civil society effort provide information excombatants successful increasing latter understanding separate mandate institution support trc amongst excombatants rose 53 85 per cent excombatants understood design purpose believed would bring reconciliation rose 52 84 per cent excombatants admitted human right violation trc offered opportunity take responsibility action according one report want confess trc think enable return community n excerpted gibril sesay mohamed suma ddr transitional justice sierra leone case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n jeremy weinstein macartan humphreys disentangling determinant successful demobilization reintegration working paper 69 washington dc center global development 2005 n postconflict reintegration initiative development empowerment pride ictj excombatants view truth reconciliation commission special court sierra leone september 2002 httpwwwictjorgenwhereregion1141html", "ProcessedSent": "n progress made lom\u00e9 shattered may 2000 fighting resumed capital city freetown", "SentID": 11101 }, { "ParagraphID": 3113, - "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \\n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \\n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \\n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \\n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \\n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \\n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", + "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -199855,7 +199855,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3113, - "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \\n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \\n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \\n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \\n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \\n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \\n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", + "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -199873,7 +199873,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3113, - "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \\n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \\n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \\n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \\n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \\n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \\n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", + "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -199891,7 +199891,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3113, - "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \\n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \\n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \\n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \\n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \\n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \\n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", + "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -199909,7 +199909,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3113, - "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \\n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \\n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \\n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \\n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \\n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \\n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", + "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -199920,14 +199920,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2. Truth commissions", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established.", + "Sentence": "\n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established.", "newParagraph": "box 2 sierra leone case study ddr context hybrid tribunal truth reconciliation commission n post conflict situation sierra leone distinctive ddr process national transitional justice initiative implemented closely coexistence truth commission criminal tribunal lom\u00e9 peace agreement stipulated mandate ddr truth reconciliation commission trc formal link however made two process peace document practice disarmament demobilization largely successful sierra leone yet research suggests lack accountability negative impact reintegration certain excombatants excombatants armed faction known committed abuse civilian population faced difficulty reintegration others n lom\u00e9 accord 1999 included cessation hostility initiation ddr program inclusion rebel force revolutionary united front ruf government blanket amnesty combatant ddr fighter signing accord representative secretary general united nation un peace negotiation included disclaimer stating un understood amnesty pardon provided agreement would cover international crime genocide crime humanity serious crime international humanitarian law active effort civil society leader sierra leone well international advocate lom\u00e9 accord also mandated truth reconciliation commission human right commission n progress made lom\u00e9 shattered may 2000 fighting resumed capital city freetown peace process put back track reinforcement un peacekeeping mission increased mediation effort resulting signing abuja protocol 2001 abuja protocol also marked abrupt change national approach accountability justice government formally requested un assistance establish court try member ruf involved war crime un supported initiative special court sierra leone scsl set august 2002 mandate try bear greatest responsibility atrocity committed sierra leone n ddr closing phase scsl trc established party lom\u00e9 peace agreement including national government ruf backed establishment trc began operation 2002 scsl stoked fear among excombatants possible criminal prosecution great deal hope trc would provide effective essential mechanism promoting reconciliation n although first concurrence tribunal truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding civil society effort provide information excombatants successful increasing latter understanding separate mandate institution support trc amongst excombatants rose 53 85 per cent excombatants understood design purpose believed would bring reconciliation rose 52 84 per cent excombatants admitted human right violation trc offered opportunity take responsibility action according one report want confess trc think enable return community n excerpted gibril sesay mohamed suma ddr transitional justice sierra leone case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n jeremy weinstein macartan humphreys disentangling determinant successful demobilization reintegration working paper 69 washington dc center global development 2005 n postconflict reintegration initiative development empowerment pride ictj excombatants view truth reconciliation commission special court sierra leone september 2002 httpwwwictjorgenwhereregion1141html", "ProcessedSent": "n ddr closing phase scsl trc established", "SentID": 11106 }, { "ParagraphID": 3113, - "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \\n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \\n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \\n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \\n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \\n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \\n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", + "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -199945,7 +199945,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3113, - "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \\n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \\n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \\n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \\n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \\n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \\n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", + "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -199963,7 +199963,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3113, - "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \\n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \\n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \\n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \\n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \\n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \\n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", + "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -199974,14 +199974,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2. Truth commissions", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution.", + "Sentence": "\n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution.", "newParagraph": "box 2 sierra leone case study ddr context hybrid tribunal truth reconciliation commission n post conflict situation sierra leone distinctive ddr process national transitional justice initiative implemented closely coexistence truth commission criminal tribunal lom\u00e9 peace agreement stipulated mandate ddr truth reconciliation commission trc formal link however made two process peace document practice disarmament demobilization largely successful sierra leone yet research suggests lack accountability negative impact reintegration certain excombatants excombatants armed faction known committed abuse civilian population faced difficulty reintegration others n lom\u00e9 accord 1999 included cessation hostility initiation ddr program inclusion rebel force revolutionary united front ruf government blanket amnesty combatant ddr fighter signing accord representative secretary general united nation un peace negotiation included disclaimer stating un understood amnesty pardon provided agreement would cover international crime genocide crime humanity serious crime international humanitarian law active effort civil society leader sierra leone well international advocate lom\u00e9 accord also mandated truth reconciliation commission human right commission n progress made lom\u00e9 shattered may 2000 fighting resumed capital city freetown peace process put back track reinforcement un peacekeeping mission increased mediation effort resulting signing abuja protocol 2001 abuja protocol also marked abrupt change national approach accountability justice government formally requested un assistance establish court try member ruf involved war crime un supported initiative special court sierra leone scsl set august 2002 mandate try bear greatest responsibility atrocity committed sierra leone n ddr closing phase scsl trc established party lom\u00e9 peace agreement including national government ruf backed establishment trc began operation 2002 scsl stoked fear among excombatants possible criminal prosecution great deal hope trc would provide effective essential mechanism promoting reconciliation n although first concurrence tribunal truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding civil society effort provide information excombatants successful increasing latter understanding separate mandate institution support trc amongst excombatants rose 53 85 per cent excombatants understood design purpose believed would bring reconciliation rose 52 84 per cent excombatants admitted human right violation trc offered opportunity take responsibility action according one report want confess trc think enable return community n excerpted gibril sesay mohamed suma ddr transitional justice sierra leone case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n jeremy weinstein macartan humphreys disentangling determinant successful demobilization reintegration working paper 69 washington dc center global development 2005 n postconflict reintegration initiative development empowerment pride ictj excombatants view truth reconciliation commission special court sierra leone september 2002 httpwwwictjorgenwhereregion1141html", "ProcessedSent": "n although first concurrence tribunal truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding civil society effort provide information excombatants successful increasing latter understanding separate mandate institution", "SentID": 11109 }, { "ParagraphID": 3113, - "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \\n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \\n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \\n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \\n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \\n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \\n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", + "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -199999,7 +199999,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3113, - "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \\n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \\n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \\n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \\n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \\n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \\n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", + "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -200017,7 +200017,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3113, - "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \\n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \\n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \\n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \\n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \\n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \\n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", + "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -200028,14 +200028,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2. Truth commissions", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \\n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming).", + "Sentence": "According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming).", "newParagraph": "box 2 sierra leone case study ddr context hybrid tribunal truth reconciliation commission n post conflict situation sierra leone distinctive ddr process national transitional justice initiative implemented closely coexistence truth commission criminal tribunal lom\u00e9 peace agreement stipulated mandate ddr truth reconciliation commission trc formal link however made two process peace document practice disarmament demobilization largely successful sierra leone yet research suggests lack accountability negative impact reintegration certain excombatants excombatants armed faction known committed abuse civilian population faced difficulty reintegration others n lom\u00e9 accord 1999 included cessation hostility initiation ddr program inclusion rebel force revolutionary united front ruf government blanket amnesty combatant ddr fighter signing accord representative secretary general united nation un peace negotiation included disclaimer stating un understood amnesty pardon provided agreement would cover international crime genocide crime humanity serious crime international humanitarian law active effort civil society leader sierra leone well international advocate lom\u00e9 accord also mandated truth reconciliation commission human right commission n progress made lom\u00e9 shattered may 2000 fighting resumed capital city freetown peace process put back track reinforcement un peacekeeping mission increased mediation effort resulting signing abuja protocol 2001 abuja protocol also marked abrupt change national approach accountability justice government formally requested un assistance establish court try member ruf involved war crime un supported initiative special court sierra leone scsl set august 2002 mandate try bear greatest responsibility atrocity committed sierra leone n ddr closing phase scsl trc established party lom\u00e9 peace agreement including national government ruf backed establishment trc began operation 2002 scsl stoked fear among excombatants possible criminal prosecution great deal hope trc would provide effective essential mechanism promoting reconciliation n although first concurrence tribunal truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding civil society effort provide information excombatants successful increasing latter understanding separate mandate institution support trc amongst excombatants rose 53 85 per cent excombatants understood design purpose believed would bring reconciliation rose 52 84 per cent excombatants admitted human right violation trc offered opportunity take responsibility action according one report want confess trc think enable return community n excerpted gibril sesay mohamed suma ddr transitional justice sierra leone case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n jeremy weinstein macartan humphreys disentangling determinant successful demobilization reintegration working paper 69 washington dc center global development 2005 n postconflict reintegration initiative development empowerment pride ictj excombatants view truth reconciliation commission special court sierra leone september 2002 httpwwwictjorgenwhereregion1141html", "ProcessedSent": "according one report want confess trc think enable return community n excerpted gibril sesay mohamed suma ddr transitional justice sierra leone case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming", "SentID": 11112 }, { "ParagraphID": 3113, - "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \\n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \\n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \\n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \\n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \\n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \\n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", + "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -200046,14 +200046,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2. Truth commissions", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No.", + "Sentence": "\n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No.", "newParagraph": "box 2 sierra leone case study ddr context hybrid tribunal truth reconciliation commission n post conflict situation sierra leone distinctive ddr process national transitional justice initiative implemented closely coexistence truth commission criminal tribunal lom\u00e9 peace agreement stipulated mandate ddr truth reconciliation commission trc formal link however made two process peace document practice disarmament demobilization largely successful sierra leone yet research suggests lack accountability negative impact reintegration certain excombatants excombatants armed faction known committed abuse civilian population faced difficulty reintegration others n lom\u00e9 accord 1999 included cessation hostility initiation ddr program inclusion rebel force revolutionary united front ruf government blanket amnesty combatant ddr fighter signing accord representative secretary general united nation un peace negotiation included disclaimer stating un understood amnesty pardon provided agreement would cover international crime genocide crime humanity serious crime international humanitarian law active effort civil society leader sierra leone well international advocate lom\u00e9 accord also mandated truth reconciliation commission human right commission n progress made lom\u00e9 shattered may 2000 fighting resumed capital city freetown peace process put back track reinforcement un peacekeeping mission increased mediation effort resulting signing abuja protocol 2001 abuja protocol also marked abrupt change national approach accountability justice government formally requested un assistance establish court try member ruf involved war crime un supported initiative special court sierra leone scsl set august 2002 mandate try bear greatest responsibility atrocity committed sierra leone n ddr closing phase scsl trc established party lom\u00e9 peace agreement including national government ruf backed establishment trc began operation 2002 scsl stoked fear among excombatants possible criminal prosecution great deal hope trc would provide effective essential mechanism promoting reconciliation n although first concurrence tribunal truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding civil society effort provide information excombatants successful increasing latter understanding separate mandate institution support trc amongst excombatants rose 53 85 per cent excombatants understood design purpose believed would bring reconciliation rose 52 84 per cent excombatants admitted human right violation trc offered opportunity take responsibility action according one report want confess trc think enable return community n excerpted gibril sesay mohamed suma ddr transitional justice sierra leone case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n jeremy weinstein macartan humphreys disentangling determinant successful demobilization reintegration working paper 69 washington dc center global development 2005 n postconflict reintegration initiative development empowerment pride ictj excombatants view truth reconciliation commission special court sierra leone september 2002 httpwwwictjorgenwhereregion1141html", "ProcessedSent": "n jeremy weinstein macartan humphreys disentangling determinant successful demobilization reintegration working paper", "SentID": 11113 }, { "ParagraphID": 3113, - "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \\n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \\n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \\n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \\n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \\n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \\n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", + "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -200071,7 +200071,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3113, - "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \\n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \\n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \\n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \\n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \\n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \\n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", + "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -200082,14 +200082,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2. Truth commissions", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002).", + "Sentence": "\n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002).", "newParagraph": "box 2 sierra leone case study ddr context hybrid tribunal truth reconciliation commission n post conflict situation sierra leone distinctive ddr process national transitional justice initiative implemented closely coexistence truth commission criminal tribunal lom\u00e9 peace agreement stipulated mandate ddr truth reconciliation commission trc formal link however made two process peace document practice disarmament demobilization largely successful sierra leone yet research suggests lack accountability negative impact reintegration certain excombatants excombatants armed faction known committed abuse civilian population faced difficulty reintegration others n lom\u00e9 accord 1999 included cessation hostility initiation ddr program inclusion rebel force revolutionary united front ruf government blanket amnesty combatant ddr fighter signing accord representative secretary general united nation un peace negotiation included disclaimer stating un understood amnesty pardon provided agreement would cover international crime genocide crime humanity serious crime international humanitarian law active effort civil society leader sierra leone well international advocate lom\u00e9 accord also mandated truth reconciliation commission human right commission n progress made lom\u00e9 shattered may 2000 fighting resumed capital city freetown peace process put back track reinforcement un peacekeeping mission increased mediation effort resulting signing abuja protocol 2001 abuja protocol also marked abrupt change national approach accountability justice government formally requested un assistance establish court try member ruf involved war crime un supported initiative special court sierra leone scsl set august 2002 mandate try bear greatest responsibility atrocity committed sierra leone n ddr closing phase scsl trc established party lom\u00e9 peace agreement including national government ruf backed establishment trc began operation 2002 scsl stoked fear among excombatants possible criminal prosecution great deal hope trc would provide effective essential mechanism promoting reconciliation n although first concurrence tribunal truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding civil society effort provide information excombatants successful increasing latter understanding separate mandate institution support trc amongst excombatants rose 53 85 per cent excombatants understood design purpose believed would bring reconciliation rose 52 84 per cent excombatants admitted human right violation trc offered opportunity take responsibility action according one report want confess trc think enable return community n excerpted gibril sesay mohamed suma ddr transitional justice sierra leone case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n jeremy weinstein macartan humphreys disentangling determinant successful demobilization reintegration working paper 69 washington dc center global development 2005 n postconflict reintegration initiative development empowerment pride ictj excombatants view truth reconciliation commission special court sierra leone september 2002 httpwwwictjorgenwhereregion1141html", "ProcessedSent": "n postconflict reintegration initiative development empowerment pride ictj excombatants view truth reconciliation commission special court sierra leone september 2002", "SentID": 11115 }, { "ParagraphID": 3113, - "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \\n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \\n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \\n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \\n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \\n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \\n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", + "Paragraph": "Box 2 Sierra Leone case study: DDR in the context of a hybrid tribunal and a truth and reconciliation commission* \n The post conflict situation in Sierra Leone was distinctive in that the DDR process and the national transitional justice initiatives were implemented very closely after each other, and because of the co-existence of both a truth commission and a criminal tribunal. The Lom\u00e9 Peace Agreement stipulated the mandates for DDR and for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), no formal links, however, were made between the two processes in the peace document or in practice. Disarmament and demobilization was largely successful in Sierra Leone, yet some research suggests that the lack of accountability had a negative impact on the reintegration of certain ex-combatants. Ex-combatants of armed factions that were known to have committed abuses against the civilian population have faced more difficulties in reintegration than others.** \n The Lom\u00e9 Accord of 1999 included a cessation of hostilities, the initiation of a DDR program, inclusion of the rebel force the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in government, a blanket amnesty for all combatants, and DDR for fighters. During the signing of the Accord, the representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN) to the peace negotiations included a disclaimer stating that the UN understood that the amnesty and pardon provided by the agreement would not cover international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and other serious crimes under international humanitarian law. Through the active efforts of civil society leaders in Sierra Leone, as well as international advocates, the Lom\u00e9 Accord also mandated a truth and reconciliation commission and a human rights commission. \n The progress made at Lom\u00e9 was shattered in May 2000 when fighting resumed in the capital city of Freetown. The peace process was put back on track after the reinforcement of the UN peacekeeping mission there and increased mediation efforts resulting in the signing of the Abuja Protocols in 2001. The Abuja Protocols also marked an abrupt change in the national approach to accountability and justice. The government formally requested the UN\u2019s assistance to establish a court to try members of the RUF involved in war crimes. The UN supported the initiative, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up in August 2002 with a mandate to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for the atrocities committed in Sierra Leone. \n The DDR was in its closing phases when the SCSL and TRC were established. All parties to the Lom\u00e9 peace agreement, including the national government and the RUF, backed the establishment of a TRC, which began operations in 2002. While the SCSL stoked fears among ex-combatants about their possible criminal prosecution, there was a great deal of hope that the TRC would provide an effective and essential mechanism for promoting reconciliation. \n Although, at first, the concurrence of a tribunal and a truth commission generated considerable misunderstanding, civil society efforts to provide information to ex-combatants were successful in increasing the latters understanding of the separate mandates of each institution. Support for the TRC amongst ex-combatants rose from 53 to 85 per cent after ex-combatants understood its design and purpose, while those who believed it would bring reconciliation rose from 52 to 84 per cent. For those ex-combatants who admitted to human rights violations the TRC offered an opportunity to take responsibility for their actions. According to one report, \u201cThey want to confess to the TRC because they think it will enable them to return to their communities.\u201d*** \n * This is excerpted from: Gibril Sesay and Mohamed Suma, \u201cDDR, Transitional Justice, and Sierra Leone,\u201d A Case Study on DDR and Transitional Justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n ** Jeremy Weinstein and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n *** The Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE) and ICTJ, \u201cEx-Combatants Views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone,\u201d (September 2002). http:\/\/www.ictj\/org\/en\/where\/region1\/141.html", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -200899,7 +200899,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3124, - "Paragraph": "Box 3 Vetting* One important aspect of institutional reform efforts in countries in transition is vetting processes to exclude from public institutions persons who lack integrity. Vetting may be defined as assessing integrity to determine suitability for public employment. Integrity refers to an employee\u2019s adherence to international standards of human rights and professional conduct, including a person\u2019s financial propriety. Public employees who are personally responsible for gross violations of human rights or serious crimes under international law reveal a basic lack of integrity and breach the trust of the citizens they were meant to serve. The citizens, in particular the victims of abuses, are unlikely to trust and rely on a public institution that retains or hires individuals with serious integrity deficits, which would fundamentally impair the institution\u2019s capacity to deliver its mandate. Vetting processes aim at excluding from public service persons with serious integrity deficits in order to (re-establish) civic trust and (re-) legitimize public institutions. \\n In many DDR programmes, ex-combatants are offered the possibility of reintegration in the national armed forces, other security sector positions such as police or border control. In these situations, coordination between DDR programs and institution reform initiatives such as SSR programmes on vetting strategies can be particularly critical. A coordinated strategy shall aim to ensure that individuals who have committed human rights violations are not employed in the public sector. \\n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", + "Paragraph": "Box 3 Vetting* One important aspect of institutional reform efforts in countries in transition is vetting processes to exclude from public institutions persons who lack integrity. Vetting may be defined as assessing integrity to determine suitability for public employment. Integrity refers to an employee\u2019s adherence to international standards of human rights and professional conduct, including a person\u2019s financial propriety. Public employees who are personally responsible for gross violations of human rights or serious crimes under international law reveal a basic lack of integrity and breach the trust of the citizens they were meant to serve. The citizens, in particular the victims of abuses, are unlikely to trust and rely on a public institution that retains or hires individuals with serious integrity deficits, which would fundamentally impair the institution\u2019s capacity to deliver its mandate. Vetting processes aim at excluding from public service persons with serious integrity deficits in order to (re-establish) civic trust and (re-) legitimize public institutions. \n In many DDR programmes, ex-combatants are offered the possibility of reintegration in the national armed forces, other security sector positions such as police or border control. In these situations, coordination between DDR programs and institution reform initiatives such as SSR programmes on vetting strategies can be particularly critical. A coordinated strategy shall aim to ensure that individuals who have committed human rights violations are not employed in the public sector. \n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -200917,7 +200917,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3124, - "Paragraph": "Box 3 Vetting* One important aspect of institutional reform efforts in countries in transition is vetting processes to exclude from public institutions persons who lack integrity. Vetting may be defined as assessing integrity to determine suitability for public employment. Integrity refers to an employee\u2019s adherence to international standards of human rights and professional conduct, including a person\u2019s financial propriety. Public employees who are personally responsible for gross violations of human rights or serious crimes under international law reveal a basic lack of integrity and breach the trust of the citizens they were meant to serve. The citizens, in particular the victims of abuses, are unlikely to trust and rely on a public institution that retains or hires individuals with serious integrity deficits, which would fundamentally impair the institution\u2019s capacity to deliver its mandate. Vetting processes aim at excluding from public service persons with serious integrity deficits in order to (re-establish) civic trust and (re-) legitimize public institutions. \\n In many DDR programmes, ex-combatants are offered the possibility of reintegration in the national armed forces, other security sector positions such as police or border control. In these situations, coordination between DDR programs and institution reform initiatives such as SSR programmes on vetting strategies can be particularly critical. A coordinated strategy shall aim to ensure that individuals who have committed human rights violations are not employed in the public sector. \\n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", + "Paragraph": "Box 3 Vetting* One important aspect of institutional reform efforts in countries in transition is vetting processes to exclude from public institutions persons who lack integrity. Vetting may be defined as assessing integrity to determine suitability for public employment. Integrity refers to an employee\u2019s adherence to international standards of human rights and professional conduct, including a person\u2019s financial propriety. Public employees who are personally responsible for gross violations of human rights or serious crimes under international law reveal a basic lack of integrity and breach the trust of the citizens they were meant to serve. The citizens, in particular the victims of abuses, are unlikely to trust and rely on a public institution that retains or hires individuals with serious integrity deficits, which would fundamentally impair the institution\u2019s capacity to deliver its mandate. Vetting processes aim at excluding from public service persons with serious integrity deficits in order to (re-establish) civic trust and (re-) legitimize public institutions. \n In many DDR programmes, ex-combatants are offered the possibility of reintegration in the national armed forces, other security sector positions such as police or border control. In these situations, coordination between DDR programs and institution reform initiatives such as SSR programmes on vetting strategies can be particularly critical. A coordinated strategy shall aim to ensure that individuals who have committed human rights violations are not employed in the public sector. \n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -200935,7 +200935,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3124, - "Paragraph": "Box 3 Vetting* One important aspect of institutional reform efforts in countries in transition is vetting processes to exclude from public institutions persons who lack integrity. Vetting may be defined as assessing integrity to determine suitability for public employment. Integrity refers to an employee\u2019s adherence to international standards of human rights and professional conduct, including a person\u2019s financial propriety. Public employees who are personally responsible for gross violations of human rights or serious crimes under international law reveal a basic lack of integrity and breach the trust of the citizens they were meant to serve. The citizens, in particular the victims of abuses, are unlikely to trust and rely on a public institution that retains or hires individuals with serious integrity deficits, which would fundamentally impair the institution\u2019s capacity to deliver its mandate. Vetting processes aim at excluding from public service persons with serious integrity deficits in order to (re-establish) civic trust and (re-) legitimize public institutions. \\n In many DDR programmes, ex-combatants are offered the possibility of reintegration in the national armed forces, other security sector positions such as police or border control. In these situations, coordination between DDR programs and institution reform initiatives such as SSR programmes on vetting strategies can be particularly critical. A coordinated strategy shall aim to ensure that individuals who have committed human rights violations are not employed in the public sector. \\n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", + "Paragraph": "Box 3 Vetting* One important aspect of institutional reform efforts in countries in transition is vetting processes to exclude from public institutions persons who lack integrity. Vetting may be defined as assessing integrity to determine suitability for public employment. Integrity refers to an employee\u2019s adherence to international standards of human rights and professional conduct, including a person\u2019s financial propriety. Public employees who are personally responsible for gross violations of human rights or serious crimes under international law reveal a basic lack of integrity and breach the trust of the citizens they were meant to serve. The citizens, in particular the victims of abuses, are unlikely to trust and rely on a public institution that retains or hires individuals with serious integrity deficits, which would fundamentally impair the institution\u2019s capacity to deliver its mandate. Vetting processes aim at excluding from public service persons with serious integrity deficits in order to (re-establish) civic trust and (re-) legitimize public institutions. \n In many DDR programmes, ex-combatants are offered the possibility of reintegration in the national armed forces, other security sector positions such as police or border control. In these situations, coordination between DDR programs and institution reform initiatives such as SSR programmes on vetting strategies can be particularly critical. A coordinated strategy shall aim to ensure that individuals who have committed human rights violations are not employed in the public sector. \n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -200953,7 +200953,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3124, - "Paragraph": "Box 3 Vetting* One important aspect of institutional reform efforts in countries in transition is vetting processes to exclude from public institutions persons who lack integrity. Vetting may be defined as assessing integrity to determine suitability for public employment. Integrity refers to an employee\u2019s adherence to international standards of human rights and professional conduct, including a person\u2019s financial propriety. Public employees who are personally responsible for gross violations of human rights or serious crimes under international law reveal a basic lack of integrity and breach the trust of the citizens they were meant to serve. The citizens, in particular the victims of abuses, are unlikely to trust and rely on a public institution that retains or hires individuals with serious integrity deficits, which would fundamentally impair the institution\u2019s capacity to deliver its mandate. Vetting processes aim at excluding from public service persons with serious integrity deficits in order to (re-establish) civic trust and (re-) legitimize public institutions. \\n In many DDR programmes, ex-combatants are offered the possibility of reintegration in the national armed forces, other security sector positions such as police or border control. In these situations, coordination between DDR programs and institution reform initiatives such as SSR programmes on vetting strategies can be particularly critical. A coordinated strategy shall aim to ensure that individuals who have committed human rights violations are not employed in the public sector. \\n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", + "Paragraph": "Box 3 Vetting* One important aspect of institutional reform efforts in countries in transition is vetting processes to exclude from public institutions persons who lack integrity. Vetting may be defined as assessing integrity to determine suitability for public employment. Integrity refers to an employee\u2019s adherence to international standards of human rights and professional conduct, including a person\u2019s financial propriety. Public employees who are personally responsible for gross violations of human rights or serious crimes under international law reveal a basic lack of integrity and breach the trust of the citizens they were meant to serve. The citizens, in particular the victims of abuses, are unlikely to trust and rely on a public institution that retains or hires individuals with serious integrity deficits, which would fundamentally impair the institution\u2019s capacity to deliver its mandate. Vetting processes aim at excluding from public service persons with serious integrity deficits in order to (re-establish) civic trust and (re-) legitimize public institutions. \n In many DDR programmes, ex-combatants are offered the possibility of reintegration in the national armed forces, other security sector positions such as police or border control. In these situations, coordination between DDR programs and institution reform initiatives such as SSR programmes on vetting strategies can be particularly critical. A coordinated strategy shall aim to ensure that individuals who have committed human rights violations are not employed in the public sector. \n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -200971,7 +200971,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3124, - "Paragraph": "Box 3 Vetting* One important aspect of institutional reform efforts in countries in transition is vetting processes to exclude from public institutions persons who lack integrity. Vetting may be defined as assessing integrity to determine suitability for public employment. Integrity refers to an employee\u2019s adherence to international standards of human rights and professional conduct, including a person\u2019s financial propriety. Public employees who are personally responsible for gross violations of human rights or serious crimes under international law reveal a basic lack of integrity and breach the trust of the citizens they were meant to serve. The citizens, in particular the victims of abuses, are unlikely to trust and rely on a public institution that retains or hires individuals with serious integrity deficits, which would fundamentally impair the institution\u2019s capacity to deliver its mandate. Vetting processes aim at excluding from public service persons with serious integrity deficits in order to (re-establish) civic trust and (re-) legitimize public institutions. \\n In many DDR programmes, ex-combatants are offered the possibility of reintegration in the national armed forces, other security sector positions such as police or border control. In these situations, coordination between DDR programs and institution reform initiatives such as SSR programmes on vetting strategies can be particularly critical. A coordinated strategy shall aim to ensure that individuals who have committed human rights violations are not employed in the public sector. \\n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", + "Paragraph": "Box 3 Vetting* One important aspect of institutional reform efforts in countries in transition is vetting processes to exclude from public institutions persons who lack integrity. Vetting may be defined as assessing integrity to determine suitability for public employment. Integrity refers to an employee\u2019s adherence to international standards of human rights and professional conduct, including a person\u2019s financial propriety. Public employees who are personally responsible for gross violations of human rights or serious crimes under international law reveal a basic lack of integrity and breach the trust of the citizens they were meant to serve. The citizens, in particular the victims of abuses, are unlikely to trust and rely on a public institution that retains or hires individuals with serious integrity deficits, which would fundamentally impair the institution\u2019s capacity to deliver its mandate. Vetting processes aim at excluding from public service persons with serious integrity deficits in order to (re-establish) civic trust and (re-) legitimize public institutions. \n In many DDR programmes, ex-combatants are offered the possibility of reintegration in the national armed forces, other security sector positions such as police or border control. In these situations, coordination between DDR programs and institution reform initiatives such as SSR programmes on vetting strategies can be particularly critical. A coordinated strategy shall aim to ensure that individuals who have committed human rights violations are not employed in the public sector. \n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -200989,7 +200989,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3124, - "Paragraph": "Box 3 Vetting* One important aspect of institutional reform efforts in countries in transition is vetting processes to exclude from public institutions persons who lack integrity. Vetting may be defined as assessing integrity to determine suitability for public employment. Integrity refers to an employee\u2019s adherence to international standards of human rights and professional conduct, including a person\u2019s financial propriety. Public employees who are personally responsible for gross violations of human rights or serious crimes under international law reveal a basic lack of integrity and breach the trust of the citizens they were meant to serve. The citizens, in particular the victims of abuses, are unlikely to trust and rely on a public institution that retains or hires individuals with serious integrity deficits, which would fundamentally impair the institution\u2019s capacity to deliver its mandate. Vetting processes aim at excluding from public service persons with serious integrity deficits in order to (re-establish) civic trust and (re-) legitimize public institutions. \\n In many DDR programmes, ex-combatants are offered the possibility of reintegration in the national armed forces, other security sector positions such as police or border control. In these situations, coordination between DDR programs and institution reform initiatives such as SSR programmes on vetting strategies can be particularly critical. A coordinated strategy shall aim to ensure that individuals who have committed human rights violations are not employed in the public sector. \\n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", + "Paragraph": "Box 3 Vetting* One important aspect of institutional reform efforts in countries in transition is vetting processes to exclude from public institutions persons who lack integrity. Vetting may be defined as assessing integrity to determine suitability for public employment. Integrity refers to an employee\u2019s adherence to international standards of human rights and professional conduct, including a person\u2019s financial propriety. Public employees who are personally responsible for gross violations of human rights or serious crimes under international law reveal a basic lack of integrity and breach the trust of the citizens they were meant to serve. The citizens, in particular the victims of abuses, are unlikely to trust and rely on a public institution that retains or hires individuals with serious integrity deficits, which would fundamentally impair the institution\u2019s capacity to deliver its mandate. Vetting processes aim at excluding from public service persons with serious integrity deficits in order to (re-establish) civic trust and (re-) legitimize public institutions. \n In many DDR programmes, ex-combatants are offered the possibility of reintegration in the national armed forces, other security sector positions such as police or border control. In these situations, coordination between DDR programs and institution reform initiatives such as SSR programmes on vetting strategies can be particularly critical. A coordinated strategy shall aim to ensure that individuals who have committed human rights violations are not employed in the public sector. \n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -201007,7 +201007,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3124, - "Paragraph": "Box 3 Vetting* One important aspect of institutional reform efforts in countries in transition is vetting processes to exclude from public institutions persons who lack integrity. Vetting may be defined as assessing integrity to determine suitability for public employment. Integrity refers to an employee\u2019s adherence to international standards of human rights and professional conduct, including a person\u2019s financial propriety. Public employees who are personally responsible for gross violations of human rights or serious crimes under international law reveal a basic lack of integrity and breach the trust of the citizens they were meant to serve. The citizens, in particular the victims of abuses, are unlikely to trust and rely on a public institution that retains or hires individuals with serious integrity deficits, which would fundamentally impair the institution\u2019s capacity to deliver its mandate. Vetting processes aim at excluding from public service persons with serious integrity deficits in order to (re-establish) civic trust and (re-) legitimize public institutions. \\n In many DDR programmes, ex-combatants are offered the possibility of reintegration in the national armed forces, other security sector positions such as police or border control. In these situations, coordination between DDR programs and institution reform initiatives such as SSR programmes on vetting strategies can be particularly critical. A coordinated strategy shall aim to ensure that individuals who have committed human rights violations are not employed in the public sector. \\n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", + "Paragraph": "Box 3 Vetting* One important aspect of institutional reform efforts in countries in transition is vetting processes to exclude from public institutions persons who lack integrity. Vetting may be defined as assessing integrity to determine suitability for public employment. Integrity refers to an employee\u2019s adherence to international standards of human rights and professional conduct, including a person\u2019s financial propriety. Public employees who are personally responsible for gross violations of human rights or serious crimes under international law reveal a basic lack of integrity and breach the trust of the citizens they were meant to serve. The citizens, in particular the victims of abuses, are unlikely to trust and rely on a public institution that retains or hires individuals with serious integrity deficits, which would fundamentally impair the institution\u2019s capacity to deliver its mandate. Vetting processes aim at excluding from public service persons with serious integrity deficits in order to (re-establish) civic trust and (re-) legitimize public institutions. \n In many DDR programmes, ex-combatants are offered the possibility of reintegration in the national armed forces, other security sector positions such as police or border control. In these situations, coordination between DDR programs and institution reform initiatives such as SSR programmes on vetting strategies can be particularly critical. A coordinated strategy shall aim to ensure that individuals who have committed human rights violations are not employed in the public sector. \n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -201018,14 +201018,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.4. Institutional reform", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n In many DDR programmes, ex-combatants are offered the possibility of reintegration in the national armed forces, other security sector positions such as police or border control.", + "Sentence": "\n In many DDR programmes, ex-combatants are offered the possibility of reintegration in the national armed forces, other security sector positions such as police or border control.", "newParagraph": "box 3 vetting one important aspect institutional reform effort country transition vetting process exclude public institution person lack integrity vetting may defined assessing integrity determine suitability public employment integrity refers employee adherence international standard human right professional conduct including person financial propriety public employee personally responsible gross violation human right serious crime international law reveal basic lack integrity breach trust citizen meant serve citizen particular victim abuse unlikely trust rely public institution retains hire individual serious integrity deficit would fundamentally impair institution capacity deliver mandate vetting process aim excluding public service person serious integrity deficit order reestablish civic trust legitimize public institution n many ddr programme excombatants offered possibility reintegration national armed force security sector position police border control situation coordination ddr program institution reform initiative ssr programme vetting strategy particularly critical coordinated strategy shall aim ensure individual committed human right violation employed public sector n text summarized ohchr rule law tool postconflict state vetting operational framework geneva new york ohchr 2006", "ProcessedSent": "n many ddr programme excombatants offered possibility reintegration national armed force security sector position police border control", "SentID": 11167 }, { "ParagraphID": 3124, - "Paragraph": "Box 3 Vetting* One important aspect of institutional reform efforts in countries in transition is vetting processes to exclude from public institutions persons who lack integrity. Vetting may be defined as assessing integrity to determine suitability for public employment. Integrity refers to an employee\u2019s adherence to international standards of human rights and professional conduct, including a person\u2019s financial propriety. Public employees who are personally responsible for gross violations of human rights or serious crimes under international law reveal a basic lack of integrity and breach the trust of the citizens they were meant to serve. The citizens, in particular the victims of abuses, are unlikely to trust and rely on a public institution that retains or hires individuals with serious integrity deficits, which would fundamentally impair the institution\u2019s capacity to deliver its mandate. Vetting processes aim at excluding from public service persons with serious integrity deficits in order to (re-establish) civic trust and (re-) legitimize public institutions. \\n In many DDR programmes, ex-combatants are offered the possibility of reintegration in the national armed forces, other security sector positions such as police or border control. In these situations, coordination between DDR programs and institution reform initiatives such as SSR programmes on vetting strategies can be particularly critical. A coordinated strategy shall aim to ensure that individuals who have committed human rights violations are not employed in the public sector. \\n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", + "Paragraph": "Box 3 Vetting* One important aspect of institutional reform efforts in countries in transition is vetting processes to exclude from public institutions persons who lack integrity. Vetting may be defined as assessing integrity to determine suitability for public employment. Integrity refers to an employee\u2019s adherence to international standards of human rights and professional conduct, including a person\u2019s financial propriety. Public employees who are personally responsible for gross violations of human rights or serious crimes under international law reveal a basic lack of integrity and breach the trust of the citizens they were meant to serve. The citizens, in particular the victims of abuses, are unlikely to trust and rely on a public institution that retains or hires individuals with serious integrity deficits, which would fundamentally impair the institution\u2019s capacity to deliver its mandate. Vetting processes aim at excluding from public service persons with serious integrity deficits in order to (re-establish) civic trust and (re-) legitimize public institutions. \n In many DDR programmes, ex-combatants are offered the possibility of reintegration in the national armed forces, other security sector positions such as police or border control. In these situations, coordination between DDR programs and institution reform initiatives such as SSR programmes on vetting strategies can be particularly critical. A coordinated strategy shall aim to ensure that individuals who have committed human rights violations are not employed in the public sector. \n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -201043,7 +201043,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3124, - "Paragraph": "Box 3 Vetting* One important aspect of institutional reform efforts in countries in transition is vetting processes to exclude from public institutions persons who lack integrity. Vetting may be defined as assessing integrity to determine suitability for public employment. Integrity refers to an employee\u2019s adherence to international standards of human rights and professional conduct, including a person\u2019s financial propriety. Public employees who are personally responsible for gross violations of human rights or serious crimes under international law reveal a basic lack of integrity and breach the trust of the citizens they were meant to serve. The citizens, in particular the victims of abuses, are unlikely to trust and rely on a public institution that retains or hires individuals with serious integrity deficits, which would fundamentally impair the institution\u2019s capacity to deliver its mandate. Vetting processes aim at excluding from public service persons with serious integrity deficits in order to (re-establish) civic trust and (re-) legitimize public institutions. \\n In many DDR programmes, ex-combatants are offered the possibility of reintegration in the national armed forces, other security sector positions such as police or border control. In these situations, coordination between DDR programs and institution reform initiatives such as SSR programmes on vetting strategies can be particularly critical. A coordinated strategy shall aim to ensure that individuals who have committed human rights violations are not employed in the public sector. \\n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", + "Paragraph": "Box 3 Vetting* One important aspect of institutional reform efforts in countries in transition is vetting processes to exclude from public institutions persons who lack integrity. Vetting may be defined as assessing integrity to determine suitability for public employment. Integrity refers to an employee\u2019s adherence to international standards of human rights and professional conduct, including a person\u2019s financial propriety. Public employees who are personally responsible for gross violations of human rights or serious crimes under international law reveal a basic lack of integrity and breach the trust of the citizens they were meant to serve. The citizens, in particular the victims of abuses, are unlikely to trust and rely on a public institution that retains or hires individuals with serious integrity deficits, which would fundamentally impair the institution\u2019s capacity to deliver its mandate. Vetting processes aim at excluding from public service persons with serious integrity deficits in order to (re-establish) civic trust and (re-) legitimize public institutions. \n In many DDR programmes, ex-combatants are offered the possibility of reintegration in the national armed forces, other security sector positions such as police or border control. In these situations, coordination between DDR programs and institution reform initiatives such as SSR programmes on vetting strategies can be particularly critical. A coordinated strategy shall aim to ensure that individuals who have committed human rights violations are not employed in the public sector. \n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -201061,7 +201061,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3124, - "Paragraph": "Box 3 Vetting* One important aspect of institutional reform efforts in countries in transition is vetting processes to exclude from public institutions persons who lack integrity. Vetting may be defined as assessing integrity to determine suitability for public employment. Integrity refers to an employee\u2019s adherence to international standards of human rights and professional conduct, including a person\u2019s financial propriety. Public employees who are personally responsible for gross violations of human rights or serious crimes under international law reveal a basic lack of integrity and breach the trust of the citizens they were meant to serve. The citizens, in particular the victims of abuses, are unlikely to trust and rely on a public institution that retains or hires individuals with serious integrity deficits, which would fundamentally impair the institution\u2019s capacity to deliver its mandate. Vetting processes aim at excluding from public service persons with serious integrity deficits in order to (re-establish) civic trust and (re-) legitimize public institutions. \\n In many DDR programmes, ex-combatants are offered the possibility of reintegration in the national armed forces, other security sector positions such as police or border control. In these situations, coordination between DDR programs and institution reform initiatives such as SSR programmes on vetting strategies can be particularly critical. A coordinated strategy shall aim to ensure that individuals who have committed human rights violations are not employed in the public sector. \\n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", + "Paragraph": "Box 3 Vetting* One important aspect of institutional reform efforts in countries in transition is vetting processes to exclude from public institutions persons who lack integrity. Vetting may be defined as assessing integrity to determine suitability for public employment. Integrity refers to an employee\u2019s adherence to international standards of human rights and professional conduct, including a person\u2019s financial propriety. Public employees who are personally responsible for gross violations of human rights or serious crimes under international law reveal a basic lack of integrity and breach the trust of the citizens they were meant to serve. The citizens, in particular the victims of abuses, are unlikely to trust and rely on a public institution that retains or hires individuals with serious integrity deficits, which would fundamentally impair the institution\u2019s capacity to deliver its mandate. Vetting processes aim at excluding from public service persons with serious integrity deficits in order to (re-establish) civic trust and (re-) legitimize public institutions. \n In many DDR programmes, ex-combatants are offered the possibility of reintegration in the national armed forces, other security sector positions such as police or border control. In these situations, coordination between DDR programs and institution reform initiatives such as SSR programmes on vetting strategies can be particularly critical. A coordinated strategy shall aim to ensure that individuals who have committed human rights violations are not employed in the public sector. \n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -201072,7 +201072,7 @@ "Heading2": "7.4. Institutional reform", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", + "Sentence": "\n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", "newParagraph": "box 3 vetting one important aspect institutional reform effort country transition vetting process exclude public institution person lack integrity vetting may defined assessing integrity determine suitability public employment integrity refers employee adherence international standard human right professional conduct including person financial propriety public employee personally responsible gross violation human right serious crime international law reveal basic lack integrity breach trust citizen meant serve citizen particular victim abuse unlikely trust rely public institution retains hire individual serious integrity deficit would fundamentally impair institution capacity deliver mandate vetting process aim excluding public service person serious integrity deficit order reestablish civic trust legitimize public institution n many ddr programme excombatants offered possibility reintegration national armed force security sector position police border control situation coordination ddr program institution reform initiative ssr programme vetting strategy particularly critical coordinated strategy shall aim ensure individual committed human right violation employed public sector n text summarized ohchr rule law tool postconflict state vetting operational framework geneva new york ohchr 2006", "ProcessedSent": "n text summarized ohchr rule law tool postconflict state vetting operational framework geneva new york ohchr 2006", "SentID": 11170 @@ -202051,7 +202051,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3138, - "Paragraph": "Children as victims and witnesses \\n The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict prohibits the compulsory recruitment and the direct participa- tion in hostilities of persons below 18 by armed forces (arts. 1 and 2). When it comes to armed groups distinct from regular armed forces, such recruitment is under any circum- stance prohibited (no matter whether voluntary or compulsory). Recruitment or use of children under the age of 15 is a recognized war crime in the Rome Statute of the ICC. The Special Court for Sierra Leone also considers child recruitment under the age of 15 as a war crime based on customary international law. A growing number of states have criminal- ized the recruitment of children (under 18) as reflected in the Optional Protocol of the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict. Of the 130 countries that have ratified the Optional Protocol, more than two thirds have adopted a minimum age of 18 for entry into the armed forces (the so called \u2018straight 18\u2019 standard.) Domestic proceedings following or during an armed conflict may also try adults for having recruited children, in which case the domestic legal standard would apply.", + "Paragraph": "Children as victims and witnesses \n The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict prohibits the compulsory recruitment and the direct participa- tion in hostilities of persons below 18 by armed forces (arts. 1 and 2). When it comes to armed groups distinct from regular armed forces, such recruitment is under any circum- stance prohibited (no matter whether voluntary or compulsory). Recruitment or use of children under the age of 15 is a recognized war crime in the Rome Statute of the ICC. The Special Court for Sierra Leone also considers child recruitment under the age of 15 as a war crime based on customary international law. A growing number of states have criminal- ized the recruitment of children (under 18) as reflected in the Optional Protocol of the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict. Of the 130 countries that have ratified the Optional Protocol, more than two thirds have adopted a minimum age of 18 for entry into the armed forces (the so called \u2018straight 18\u2019 standard.) Domestic proceedings following or during an armed conflict may also try adults for having recruited children, in which case the domestic legal standard would apply.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -202062,14 +202062,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.7. Justice for children recruited or used by armed groups and forces", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Children as victims and witnesses \\n The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict prohibits the compulsory recruitment and the direct participa- tion in hostilities of persons below 18 by armed forces (arts.", + "Sentence": "Children as victims and witnesses \n The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict prohibits the compulsory recruitment and the direct participa- tion in hostilities of persons below 18 by armed forces (arts.", "newParagraph": "child victim witness n optional protocol convention right child involvement child armed conflict prohibits compulsory recruitment direct participa tion hostility person 18 armed force art 1 2 come armed group distinct regular armed force recruitment circum stance prohibited matter whether voluntary compulsory recruitment use child age 15 recognized war crime rome statute icc special court sierra leone also considers child recruitment age 15 war crime based customary international law growing number state criminal ized recruitment child 18 reflected optional protocol convention right child involvement child armed conflict 130 country ratified optional protocol two third adopted minimum age 18 entry armed force called straight 18 standard domestic proceeding following armed conflict may also try adult recruited child case domestic legal standard would apply", "ProcessedSent": "child victim witness n optional protocol convention right child involvement child armed conflict prohibits compulsory recruitment direct participa tion hostility person 18 armed force art", "SentID": 11225 }, { "ParagraphID": 3138, - "Paragraph": "Children as victims and witnesses \\n The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict prohibits the compulsory recruitment and the direct participa- tion in hostilities of persons below 18 by armed forces (arts. 1 and 2). When it comes to armed groups distinct from regular armed forces, such recruitment is under any circum- stance prohibited (no matter whether voluntary or compulsory). Recruitment or use of children under the age of 15 is a recognized war crime in the Rome Statute of the ICC. The Special Court for Sierra Leone also considers child recruitment under the age of 15 as a war crime based on customary international law. A growing number of states have criminal- ized the recruitment of children (under 18) as reflected in the Optional Protocol of the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict. Of the 130 countries that have ratified the Optional Protocol, more than two thirds have adopted a minimum age of 18 for entry into the armed forces (the so called \u2018straight 18\u2019 standard.) Domestic proceedings following or during an armed conflict may also try adults for having recruited children, in which case the domestic legal standard would apply.", + "Paragraph": "Children as victims and witnesses \n The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict prohibits the compulsory recruitment and the direct participa- tion in hostilities of persons below 18 by armed forces (arts. 1 and 2). When it comes to armed groups distinct from regular armed forces, such recruitment is under any circum- stance prohibited (no matter whether voluntary or compulsory). Recruitment or use of children under the age of 15 is a recognized war crime in the Rome Statute of the ICC. The Special Court for Sierra Leone also considers child recruitment under the age of 15 as a war crime based on customary international law. A growing number of states have criminal- ized the recruitment of children (under 18) as reflected in the Optional Protocol of the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict. Of the 130 countries that have ratified the Optional Protocol, more than two thirds have adopted a minimum age of 18 for entry into the armed forces (the so called \u2018straight 18\u2019 standard.) Domestic proceedings following or during an armed conflict may also try adults for having recruited children, in which case the domestic legal standard would apply.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -202087,7 +202087,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3138, - "Paragraph": "Children as victims and witnesses \\n The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict prohibits the compulsory recruitment and the direct participa- tion in hostilities of persons below 18 by armed forces (arts. 1 and 2). When it comes to armed groups distinct from regular armed forces, such recruitment is under any circum- stance prohibited (no matter whether voluntary or compulsory). Recruitment or use of children under the age of 15 is a recognized war crime in the Rome Statute of the ICC. The Special Court for Sierra Leone also considers child recruitment under the age of 15 as a war crime based on customary international law. A growing number of states have criminal- ized the recruitment of children (under 18) as reflected in the Optional Protocol of the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict. Of the 130 countries that have ratified the Optional Protocol, more than two thirds have adopted a minimum age of 18 for entry into the armed forces (the so called \u2018straight 18\u2019 standard.) Domestic proceedings following or during an armed conflict may also try adults for having recruited children, in which case the domestic legal standard would apply.", + "Paragraph": "Children as victims and witnesses \n The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict prohibits the compulsory recruitment and the direct participa- tion in hostilities of persons below 18 by armed forces (arts. 1 and 2). When it comes to armed groups distinct from regular armed forces, such recruitment is under any circum- stance prohibited (no matter whether voluntary or compulsory). Recruitment or use of children under the age of 15 is a recognized war crime in the Rome Statute of the ICC. The Special Court for Sierra Leone also considers child recruitment under the age of 15 as a war crime based on customary international law. A growing number of states have criminal- ized the recruitment of children (under 18) as reflected in the Optional Protocol of the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict. Of the 130 countries that have ratified the Optional Protocol, more than two thirds have adopted a minimum age of 18 for entry into the armed forces (the so called \u2018straight 18\u2019 standard.) Domestic proceedings following or during an armed conflict may also try adults for having recruited children, in which case the domestic legal standard would apply.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -202105,7 +202105,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3138, - "Paragraph": "Children as victims and witnesses \\n The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict prohibits the compulsory recruitment and the direct participa- tion in hostilities of persons below 18 by armed forces (arts. 1 and 2). When it comes to armed groups distinct from regular armed forces, such recruitment is under any circum- stance prohibited (no matter whether voluntary or compulsory). Recruitment or use of children under the age of 15 is a recognized war crime in the Rome Statute of the ICC. The Special Court for Sierra Leone also considers child recruitment under the age of 15 as a war crime based on customary international law. A growing number of states have criminal- ized the recruitment of children (under 18) as reflected in the Optional Protocol of the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict. Of the 130 countries that have ratified the Optional Protocol, more than two thirds have adopted a minimum age of 18 for entry into the armed forces (the so called \u2018straight 18\u2019 standard.) Domestic proceedings following or during an armed conflict may also try adults for having recruited children, in which case the domestic legal standard would apply.", + "Paragraph": "Children as victims and witnesses \n The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict prohibits the compulsory recruitment and the direct participa- tion in hostilities of persons below 18 by armed forces (arts. 1 and 2). When it comes to armed groups distinct from regular armed forces, such recruitment is under any circum- stance prohibited (no matter whether voluntary or compulsory). Recruitment or use of children under the age of 15 is a recognized war crime in the Rome Statute of the ICC. The Special Court for Sierra Leone also considers child recruitment under the age of 15 as a war crime based on customary international law. A growing number of states have criminal- ized the recruitment of children (under 18) as reflected in the Optional Protocol of the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict. Of the 130 countries that have ratified the Optional Protocol, more than two thirds have adopted a minimum age of 18 for entry into the armed forces (the so called \u2018straight 18\u2019 standard.) Domestic proceedings following or during an armed conflict may also try adults for having recruited children, in which case the domestic legal standard would apply.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -202123,7 +202123,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3138, - "Paragraph": "Children as victims and witnesses \\n The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict prohibits the compulsory recruitment and the direct participa- tion in hostilities of persons below 18 by armed forces (arts. 1 and 2). When it comes to armed groups distinct from regular armed forces, such recruitment is under any circum- stance prohibited (no matter whether voluntary or compulsory). Recruitment or use of children under the age of 15 is a recognized war crime in the Rome Statute of the ICC. The Special Court for Sierra Leone also considers child recruitment under the age of 15 as a war crime based on customary international law. A growing number of states have criminal- ized the recruitment of children (under 18) as reflected in the Optional Protocol of the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict. Of the 130 countries that have ratified the Optional Protocol, more than two thirds have adopted a minimum age of 18 for entry into the armed forces (the so called \u2018straight 18\u2019 standard.) Domestic proceedings following or during an armed conflict may also try adults for having recruited children, in which case the domestic legal standard would apply.", + "Paragraph": "Children as victims and witnesses \n The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict prohibits the compulsory recruitment and the direct participa- tion in hostilities of persons below 18 by armed forces (arts. 1 and 2). When it comes to armed groups distinct from regular armed forces, such recruitment is under any circum- stance prohibited (no matter whether voluntary or compulsory). Recruitment or use of children under the age of 15 is a recognized war crime in the Rome Statute of the ICC. The Special Court for Sierra Leone also considers child recruitment under the age of 15 as a war crime based on customary international law. A growing number of states have criminal- ized the recruitment of children (under 18) as reflected in the Optional Protocol of the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict. Of the 130 countries that have ratified the Optional Protocol, more than two thirds have adopted a minimum age of 18 for entry into the armed forces (the so called \u2018straight 18\u2019 standard.) Domestic proceedings following or during an armed conflict may also try adults for having recruited children, in which case the domestic legal standard would apply.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -202141,7 +202141,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3138, - "Paragraph": "Children as victims and witnesses \\n The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict prohibits the compulsory recruitment and the direct participa- tion in hostilities of persons below 18 by armed forces (arts. 1 and 2). When it comes to armed groups distinct from regular armed forces, such recruitment is under any circum- stance prohibited (no matter whether voluntary or compulsory). Recruitment or use of children under the age of 15 is a recognized war crime in the Rome Statute of the ICC. The Special Court for Sierra Leone also considers child recruitment under the age of 15 as a war crime based on customary international law. A growing number of states have criminal- ized the recruitment of children (under 18) as reflected in the Optional Protocol of the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict. Of the 130 countries that have ratified the Optional Protocol, more than two thirds have adopted a minimum age of 18 for entry into the armed forces (the so called \u2018straight 18\u2019 standard.) Domestic proceedings following or during an armed conflict may also try adults for having recruited children, in which case the domestic legal standard would apply.", + "Paragraph": "Children as victims and witnesses \n The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict prohibits the compulsory recruitment and the direct participa- tion in hostilities of persons below 18 by armed forces (arts. 1 and 2). When it comes to armed groups distinct from regular armed forces, such recruitment is under any circum- stance prohibited (no matter whether voluntary or compulsory). Recruitment or use of children under the age of 15 is a recognized war crime in the Rome Statute of the ICC. The Special Court for Sierra Leone also considers child recruitment under the age of 15 as a war crime based on customary international law. A growing number of states have criminal- ized the recruitment of children (under 18) as reflected in the Optional Protocol of the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict. Of the 130 countries that have ratified the Optional Protocol, more than two thirds have adopted a minimum age of 18 for entry into the armed forces (the so called \u2018straight 18\u2019 standard.) Domestic proceedings following or during an armed conflict may also try adults for having recruited children, in which case the domestic legal standard would apply.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -202159,7 +202159,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3138, - "Paragraph": "Children as victims and witnesses \\n The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict prohibits the compulsory recruitment and the direct participa- tion in hostilities of persons below 18 by armed forces (arts. 1 and 2). When it comes to armed groups distinct from regular armed forces, such recruitment is under any circum- stance prohibited (no matter whether voluntary or compulsory). Recruitment or use of children under the age of 15 is a recognized war crime in the Rome Statute of the ICC. The Special Court for Sierra Leone also considers child recruitment under the age of 15 as a war crime based on customary international law. A growing number of states have criminal- ized the recruitment of children (under 18) as reflected in the Optional Protocol of the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict. Of the 130 countries that have ratified the Optional Protocol, more than two thirds have adopted a minimum age of 18 for entry into the armed forces (the so called \u2018straight 18\u2019 standard.) Domestic proceedings following or during an armed conflict may also try adults for having recruited children, in which case the domestic legal standard would apply.", + "Paragraph": "Children as victims and witnesses \n The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict prohibits the compulsory recruitment and the direct participa- tion in hostilities of persons below 18 by armed forces (arts. 1 and 2). When it comes to armed groups distinct from regular armed forces, such recruitment is under any circum- stance prohibited (no matter whether voluntary or compulsory). Recruitment or use of children under the age of 15 is a recognized war crime in the Rome Statute of the ICC. The Special Court for Sierra Leone also considers child recruitment under the age of 15 as a war crime based on customary international law. A growing number of states have criminal- ized the recruitment of children (under 18) as reflected in the Optional Protocol of the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict. Of the 130 countries that have ratified the Optional Protocol, more than two thirds have adopted a minimum age of 18 for entry into the armed forces (the so called \u2018straight 18\u2019 standard.) Domestic proceedings following or during an armed conflict may also try adults for having recruited children, in which case the domestic legal standard would apply.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -202177,7 +202177,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3138, - "Paragraph": "Children as victims and witnesses \\n The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict prohibits the compulsory recruitment and the direct participa- tion in hostilities of persons below 18 by armed forces (arts. 1 and 2). When it comes to armed groups distinct from regular armed forces, such recruitment is under any circum- stance prohibited (no matter whether voluntary or compulsory). Recruitment or use of children under the age of 15 is a recognized war crime in the Rome Statute of the ICC. The Special Court for Sierra Leone also considers child recruitment under the age of 15 as a war crime based on customary international law. A growing number of states have criminal- ized the recruitment of children (under 18) as reflected in the Optional Protocol of the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict. Of the 130 countries that have ratified the Optional Protocol, more than two thirds have adopted a minimum age of 18 for entry into the armed forces (the so called \u2018straight 18\u2019 standard.) Domestic proceedings following or during an armed conflict may also try adults for having recruited children, in which case the domestic legal standard would apply.", + "Paragraph": "Children as victims and witnesses \n The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict prohibits the compulsory recruitment and the direct participa- tion in hostilities of persons below 18 by armed forces (arts. 1 and 2). When it comes to armed groups distinct from regular armed forces, such recruitment is under any circum- stance prohibited (no matter whether voluntary or compulsory). Recruitment or use of children under the age of 15 is a recognized war crime in the Rome Statute of the ICC. The Special Court for Sierra Leone also considers child recruitment under the age of 15 as a war crime based on customary international law. A growing number of states have criminal- ized the recruitment of children (under 18) as reflected in the Optional Protocol of the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict. Of the 130 countries that have ratified the Optional Protocol, more than two thirds have adopted a minimum age of 18 for entry into the armed forces (the so called \u2018straight 18\u2019 standard.) Domestic proceedings following or during an armed conflict may also try adults for having recruited children, in which case the domestic legal standard would apply.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -202447,7 +202447,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3144, - "Paragraph": "Children as alleged perpetrators \\n Children who have been associated with armed forces or armed groups should not be prosecuted or punished solely for their membership in these forces or groups. Children accused of crimes under international law must be treated in accordance with the CRC, the Beijing Rules and related international juvenile justice and fair trial standards. Accounta- bility measures for alleged child perpetrators should be in the best interests of the child and should be conducted in a manner that takes into account their age at the time of the alleged commission of the crime, promotes their sense of dignity and worth, and supports their reintegration and potential to assume a constructive role in society. Wherever appropriate, alternatives to judicial proceedings should be pursued.", + "Paragraph": "Children as alleged perpetrators \n Children who have been associated with armed forces or armed groups should not be prosecuted or punished solely for their membership in these forces or groups. Children accused of crimes under international law must be treated in accordance with the CRC, the Beijing Rules and related international juvenile justice and fair trial standards. Accounta- bility measures for alleged child perpetrators should be in the best interests of the child and should be conducted in a manner that takes into account their age at the time of the alleged commission of the crime, promotes their sense of dignity and worth, and supports their reintegration and potential to assume a constructive role in society. Wherever appropriate, alternatives to judicial proceedings should be pursued.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -202458,14 +202458,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.7. Justice for children recruited or used by armed groups and forces", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Children as alleged perpetrators \\n Children who have been associated with armed forces or armed groups should not be prosecuted or punished solely for their membership in these forces or groups.", + "Sentence": "Children as alleged perpetrators \n Children who have been associated with armed forces or armed groups should not be prosecuted or punished solely for their membership in these forces or groups.", "newParagraph": "child alleged perpetrator n child associated armed force armed group prosecuted punished solely membership force group child accused crime international law must treated accordance crc beijing rule related international juvenile justice fair trial standard accounta bility measure alleged child perpetrator best interest child conducted manner take account age time alleged commission crime promotes sense dignity worth support reintegration potential assume constructive role society wherever appropriate alternative judicial proceeding pursued", "ProcessedSent": "child alleged perpetrator n child associated armed force armed group prosecuted punished solely membership force group", "SentID": 11247 }, { "ParagraphID": 3144, - "Paragraph": "Children as alleged perpetrators \\n Children who have been associated with armed forces or armed groups should not be prosecuted or punished solely for their membership in these forces or groups. Children accused of crimes under international law must be treated in accordance with the CRC, the Beijing Rules and related international juvenile justice and fair trial standards. Accounta- bility measures for alleged child perpetrators should be in the best interests of the child and should be conducted in a manner that takes into account their age at the time of the alleged commission of the crime, promotes their sense of dignity and worth, and supports their reintegration and potential to assume a constructive role in society. Wherever appropriate, alternatives to judicial proceedings should be pursued.", + "Paragraph": "Children as alleged perpetrators \n Children who have been associated with armed forces or armed groups should not be prosecuted or punished solely for their membership in these forces or groups. Children accused of crimes under international law must be treated in accordance with the CRC, the Beijing Rules and related international juvenile justice and fair trial standards. Accounta- bility measures for alleged child perpetrators should be in the best interests of the child and should be conducted in a manner that takes into account their age at the time of the alleged commission of the crime, promotes their sense of dignity and worth, and supports their reintegration and potential to assume a constructive role in society. Wherever appropriate, alternatives to judicial proceedings should be pursued.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -202483,7 +202483,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3144, - "Paragraph": "Children as alleged perpetrators \\n Children who have been associated with armed forces or armed groups should not be prosecuted or punished solely for their membership in these forces or groups. Children accused of crimes under international law must be treated in accordance with the CRC, the Beijing Rules and related international juvenile justice and fair trial standards. Accounta- bility measures for alleged child perpetrators should be in the best interests of the child and should be conducted in a manner that takes into account their age at the time of the alleged commission of the crime, promotes their sense of dignity and worth, and supports their reintegration and potential to assume a constructive role in society. Wherever appropriate, alternatives to judicial proceedings should be pursued.", + "Paragraph": "Children as alleged perpetrators \n Children who have been associated with armed forces or armed groups should not be prosecuted or punished solely for their membership in these forces or groups. Children accused of crimes under international law must be treated in accordance with the CRC, the Beijing Rules and related international juvenile justice and fair trial standards. Accounta- bility measures for alleged child perpetrators should be in the best interests of the child and should be conducted in a manner that takes into account their age at the time of the alleged commission of the crime, promotes their sense of dignity and worth, and supports their reintegration and potential to assume a constructive role in society. Wherever appropriate, alternatives to judicial proceedings should be pursued.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -202501,7 +202501,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3144, - "Paragraph": "Children as alleged perpetrators \\n Children who have been associated with armed forces or armed groups should not be prosecuted or punished solely for their membership in these forces or groups. Children accused of crimes under international law must be treated in accordance with the CRC, the Beijing Rules and related international juvenile justice and fair trial standards. Accounta- bility measures for alleged child perpetrators should be in the best interests of the child and should be conducted in a manner that takes into account their age at the time of the alleged commission of the crime, promotes their sense of dignity and worth, and supports their reintegration and potential to assume a constructive role in society. Wherever appropriate, alternatives to judicial proceedings should be pursued.", + "Paragraph": "Children as alleged perpetrators \n Children who have been associated with armed forces or armed groups should not be prosecuted or punished solely for their membership in these forces or groups. Children accused of crimes under international law must be treated in accordance with the CRC, the Beijing Rules and related international juvenile justice and fair trial standards. Accounta- bility measures for alleged child perpetrators should be in the best interests of the child and should be conducted in a manner that takes into account their age at the time of the alleged commission of the crime, promotes their sense of dignity and worth, and supports their reintegration and potential to assume a constructive role in society. Wherever appropriate, alternatives to judicial proceedings should be pursued.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -202681,7 +202681,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3148, - "Paragraph": "Box 4 The rule of law and transitional justice \\n Strategies for expediting a return to the rule of law must be integrated with plans to reintegrate both displaced civilians and former fighters. Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration processes are one of the keys to a transition out of conflict and back to normalcy. For populations traumatized by war, those processes are among the most visible signs of the gradual return of peace and security. Similarly, displaced persons must be the subject of dedicated programmes to facilitate return. Carefully crafted amnesties can help in the return and reintegration of both groups and should be encouraged, although, as noted above, these can never be permitted to excuse genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity or gross violations of human rights. \\n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", + "Paragraph": "Box 4 The rule of law and transitional justice \n Strategies for expediting a return to the rule of law must be integrated with plans to reintegrate both displaced civilians and former fighters. Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration processes are one of the keys to a transition out of conflict and back to normalcy. For populations traumatized by war, those processes are among the most visible signs of the gradual return of peace and security. Similarly, displaced persons must be the subject of dedicated programmes to facilitate return. Carefully crafted amnesties can help in the return and reintegration of both groups and should be encouraged, although, as noted above, these can never be permitted to excuse genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity or gross violations of human rights. \n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -202692,14 +202692,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.7. Justice for children recruited or used by armed groups and forces", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Box 4 The rule of law and transitional justice \\n Strategies for expediting a return to the rule of law must be integrated with plans to reintegrate both displaced civilians and former fighters.", + "Sentence": "Box 4 The rule of law and transitional justice \n Strategies for expediting a return to the rule of law must be integrated with plans to reintegrate both displaced civilians and former fighters.", "newParagraph": "box 4 rule law transitional justice n strategy expediting return rule law must integrated plan reintegrate displaced civilian former fighter disarmament demobilization reintegration process one key transition conflict back normalcy population traumatized war process among visible sign gradual return peace security similarly displaced person must subject dedicated programme facilitate return carefully crafted amnesty help return reintegration group encouraged although noted never permitted excuse genocide war crime crime humanity gross violation human right n text summarized ohchr rule law tool postconflict state vetting operational framework geneva new york ohchr 2006", "ProcessedSent": "box 4 rule law transitional justice n strategy expediting return rule law must integrated plan reintegrate displaced civilian former fighter", "SentID": 11260 }, { "ParagraphID": 3148, - "Paragraph": "Box 4 The rule of law and transitional justice \\n Strategies for expediting a return to the rule of law must be integrated with plans to reintegrate both displaced civilians and former fighters. Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration processes are one of the keys to a transition out of conflict and back to normalcy. For populations traumatized by war, those processes are among the most visible signs of the gradual return of peace and security. Similarly, displaced persons must be the subject of dedicated programmes to facilitate return. Carefully crafted amnesties can help in the return and reintegration of both groups and should be encouraged, although, as noted above, these can never be permitted to excuse genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity or gross violations of human rights. \\n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", + "Paragraph": "Box 4 The rule of law and transitional justice \n Strategies for expediting a return to the rule of law must be integrated with plans to reintegrate both displaced civilians and former fighters. Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration processes are one of the keys to a transition out of conflict and back to normalcy. For populations traumatized by war, those processes are among the most visible signs of the gradual return of peace and security. Similarly, displaced persons must be the subject of dedicated programmes to facilitate return. Carefully crafted amnesties can help in the return and reintegration of both groups and should be encouraged, although, as noted above, these can never be permitted to excuse genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity or gross violations of human rights. \n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -202717,7 +202717,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3148, - "Paragraph": "Box 4 The rule of law and transitional justice \\n Strategies for expediting a return to the rule of law must be integrated with plans to reintegrate both displaced civilians and former fighters. Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration processes are one of the keys to a transition out of conflict and back to normalcy. For populations traumatized by war, those processes are among the most visible signs of the gradual return of peace and security. Similarly, displaced persons must be the subject of dedicated programmes to facilitate return. Carefully crafted amnesties can help in the return and reintegration of both groups and should be encouraged, although, as noted above, these can never be permitted to excuse genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity or gross violations of human rights. \\n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", + "Paragraph": "Box 4 The rule of law and transitional justice \n Strategies for expediting a return to the rule of law must be integrated with plans to reintegrate both displaced civilians and former fighters. Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration processes are one of the keys to a transition out of conflict and back to normalcy. For populations traumatized by war, those processes are among the most visible signs of the gradual return of peace and security. Similarly, displaced persons must be the subject of dedicated programmes to facilitate return. Carefully crafted amnesties can help in the return and reintegration of both groups and should be encouraged, although, as noted above, these can never be permitted to excuse genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity or gross violations of human rights. \n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -202735,7 +202735,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3148, - "Paragraph": "Box 4 The rule of law and transitional justice \\n Strategies for expediting a return to the rule of law must be integrated with plans to reintegrate both displaced civilians and former fighters. Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration processes are one of the keys to a transition out of conflict and back to normalcy. For populations traumatized by war, those processes are among the most visible signs of the gradual return of peace and security. Similarly, displaced persons must be the subject of dedicated programmes to facilitate return. Carefully crafted amnesties can help in the return and reintegration of both groups and should be encouraged, although, as noted above, these can never be permitted to excuse genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity or gross violations of human rights. \\n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", + "Paragraph": "Box 4 The rule of law and transitional justice \n Strategies for expediting a return to the rule of law must be integrated with plans to reintegrate both displaced civilians and former fighters. Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration processes are one of the keys to a transition out of conflict and back to normalcy. For populations traumatized by war, those processes are among the most visible signs of the gradual return of peace and security. Similarly, displaced persons must be the subject of dedicated programmes to facilitate return. Carefully crafted amnesties can help in the return and reintegration of both groups and should be encouraged, although, as noted above, these can never be permitted to excuse genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity or gross violations of human rights. \n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -202753,7 +202753,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3148, - "Paragraph": "Box 4 The rule of law and transitional justice \\n Strategies for expediting a return to the rule of law must be integrated with plans to reintegrate both displaced civilians and former fighters. Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration processes are one of the keys to a transition out of conflict and back to normalcy. For populations traumatized by war, those processes are among the most visible signs of the gradual return of peace and security. Similarly, displaced persons must be the subject of dedicated programmes to facilitate return. Carefully crafted amnesties can help in the return and reintegration of both groups and should be encouraged, although, as noted above, these can never be permitted to excuse genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity or gross violations of human rights. \\n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", + "Paragraph": "Box 4 The rule of law and transitional justice \n Strategies for expediting a return to the rule of law must be integrated with plans to reintegrate both displaced civilians and former fighters. Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration processes are one of the keys to a transition out of conflict and back to normalcy. For populations traumatized by war, those processes are among the most visible signs of the gradual return of peace and security. Similarly, displaced persons must be the subject of dedicated programmes to facilitate return. Carefully crafted amnesties can help in the return and reintegration of both groups and should be encouraged, although, as noted above, these can never be permitted to excuse genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity or gross violations of human rights. \n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -202771,7 +202771,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3148, - "Paragraph": "Box 4 The rule of law and transitional justice \\n Strategies for expediting a return to the rule of law must be integrated with plans to reintegrate both displaced civilians and former fighters. Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration processes are one of the keys to a transition out of conflict and back to normalcy. For populations traumatized by war, those processes are among the most visible signs of the gradual return of peace and security. Similarly, displaced persons must be the subject of dedicated programmes to facilitate return. Carefully crafted amnesties can help in the return and reintegration of both groups and should be encouraged, although, as noted above, these can never be permitted to excuse genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity or gross violations of human rights. \\n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", + "Paragraph": "Box 4 The rule of law and transitional justice \n Strategies for expediting a return to the rule of law must be integrated with plans to reintegrate both displaced civilians and former fighters. Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration processes are one of the keys to a transition out of conflict and back to normalcy. For populations traumatized by war, those processes are among the most visible signs of the gradual return of peace and security. Similarly, displaced persons must be the subject of dedicated programmes to facilitate return. Carefully crafted amnesties can help in the return and reintegration of both groups and should be encouraged, although, as noted above, these can never be permitted to excuse genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity or gross violations of human rights. \n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -202782,7 +202782,7 @@ "Heading2": "7.7. Justice for children recruited or used by armed groups and forces", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", + "Sentence": "\n * This text is summarized from the OHCHR Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States, Vetting: an operational framework (Geneva and New York: OHCHR, 2006)", "newParagraph": "box 4 rule law transitional justice n strategy expediting return rule law must integrated plan reintegrate displaced civilian former fighter disarmament demobilization reintegration process one key transition conflict back normalcy population traumatized war process among visible sign gradual return peace security similarly displaced person must subject dedicated programme facilitate return carefully crafted amnesty help return reintegration group encouraged although noted never permitted excuse genocide war crime crime humanity gross violation human right n text summarized ohchr rule law tool postconflict state vetting operational framework geneva new york ohchr 2006", "ProcessedSent": "n text summarized ohchr rule law tool postconflict state vetting operational framework geneva new york ohchr 2006", "SentID": 11265 @@ -203023,7 +203023,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3152, - "Paragraph": "Box 5 Action points for mediators, donors, practitioners and national actors \\n\\n Action points for mediators and other participants in peacemaking \\n Include obligations for accountability, truth, reparation and guarantees of non-reoccurrence in peace agreements. \\n Include victims in peace negotiation processes. \\n Reject amnesties for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and gross violations of human rights. \\n\\n Action points for donors \\n Donors for DDR programmes may consider comparative commitments to reparations for victims before or while the DDR process proceeds. \\n\\n Action points for DDR practitioners \\n Integrate human rights and transitional justice components into the training programmes and support materials for UN mediators and DDR practitioners, including of national DDR commissions. \\n\\n Action points for national DDR actors \\n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of the DDR programme. \\n Ensure that the DDR programme meets national and international obligations concerning account-ability, truth, reparations and guarantees of non-repetition.", + "Paragraph": "Box 5 Action points for mediators, donors, practitioners and national actors \n\n Action points for mediators and other participants in peacemaking \n Include obligations for accountability, truth, reparation and guarantees of non-reoccurrence in peace agreements. \n Include victims in peace negotiation processes. \n Reject amnesties for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and gross violations of human rights. \n\n Action points for donors \n Donors for DDR programmes may consider comparative commitments to reparations for victims before or while the DDR process proceeds. \n\n Action points for DDR practitioners \n Integrate human rights and transitional justice components into the training programmes and support materials for UN mediators and DDR practitioners, including of national DDR commissions. \n\n Action points for national DDR actors \n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of the DDR programme. \n Ensure that the DDR programme meets national and international obligations concerning account-ability, truth, reparations and guarantees of non-repetition.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -203034,14 +203034,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.1. Ensuring DDR that complies with international standards .", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Box 5 Action points for mediators, donors, practitioners and national actors \\n\\n Action points for mediators and other participants in peacemaking \\n Include obligations for accountability, truth, reparation and guarantees of non-reoccurrence in peace agreements.", + "Sentence": "Box 5 Action points for mediators, donors, practitioners and national actors \n\n Action points for mediators and other participants in peacemaking \n Include obligations for accountability, truth, reparation and guarantees of non-reoccurrence in peace agreements.", "newParagraph": "box 5 action point mediator donor practitioner national actor nn action point mediator participant peacemaking n include obligation accountability truth reparation guarantee nonreoccurrence peace agreement n include victim peace negotiation process n reject amnesty genocide crime humanity war crime gross violation human right nn action point donor n donor ddr programme may consider comparative commitment reparation victim ddr process proceeds nn action point ddr practitioner n integrate human right transitional justice component training programme support material un mediator ddr practitioner including national ddr commission nn action point national ddr actor n incorporate commitment international humanitarian human right law design ddr programme n ensure ddr programme meet national international obligation concerning accountability truth reparation guarantee nonrepetition", "ProcessedSent": "box 5 action point mediator donor practitioner national actor nn action point mediator participant peacemaking n include obligation accountability truth reparation guarantee nonreoccurrence peace agreement", "SentID": 11279 }, { "ParagraphID": 3152, - "Paragraph": "Box 5 Action points for mediators, donors, practitioners and national actors \\n\\n Action points for mediators and other participants in peacemaking \\n Include obligations for accountability, truth, reparation and guarantees of non-reoccurrence in peace agreements. \\n Include victims in peace negotiation processes. \\n Reject amnesties for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and gross violations of human rights. \\n\\n Action points for donors \\n Donors for DDR programmes may consider comparative commitments to reparations for victims before or while the DDR process proceeds. \\n\\n Action points for DDR practitioners \\n Integrate human rights and transitional justice components into the training programmes and support materials for UN mediators and DDR practitioners, including of national DDR commissions. \\n\\n Action points for national DDR actors \\n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of the DDR programme. \\n Ensure that the DDR programme meets national and international obligations concerning account-ability, truth, reparations and guarantees of non-repetition.", + "Paragraph": "Box 5 Action points for mediators, donors, practitioners and national actors \n\n Action points for mediators and other participants in peacemaking \n Include obligations for accountability, truth, reparation and guarantees of non-reoccurrence in peace agreements. \n Include victims in peace negotiation processes. \n Reject amnesties for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and gross violations of human rights. \n\n Action points for donors \n Donors for DDR programmes may consider comparative commitments to reparations for victims before or while the DDR process proceeds. \n\n Action points for DDR practitioners \n Integrate human rights and transitional justice components into the training programmes and support materials for UN mediators and DDR practitioners, including of national DDR commissions. \n\n Action points for national DDR actors \n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of the DDR programme. \n Ensure that the DDR programme meets national and international obligations concerning account-ability, truth, reparations and guarantees of non-repetition.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -203052,14 +203052,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.1. Ensuring DDR that complies with international standards .", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Include victims in peace negotiation processes.", + "Sentence": "\n Include victims in peace negotiation processes.", "newParagraph": "box 5 action point mediator donor practitioner national actor nn action point mediator participant peacemaking n include obligation accountability truth reparation guarantee nonreoccurrence peace agreement n include victim peace negotiation process n reject amnesty genocide crime humanity war crime gross violation human right nn action point donor n donor ddr programme may consider comparative commitment reparation victim ddr process proceeds nn action point ddr practitioner n integrate human right transitional justice component training programme support material un mediator ddr practitioner including national ddr commission nn action point national ddr actor n incorporate commitment international humanitarian human right law design ddr programme n ensure ddr programme meet national international obligation concerning accountability truth reparation guarantee nonrepetition", "ProcessedSent": "n include victim peace negotiation process", "SentID": 11280 }, { "ParagraphID": 3152, - "Paragraph": "Box 5 Action points for mediators, donors, practitioners and national actors \\n\\n Action points for mediators and other participants in peacemaking \\n Include obligations for accountability, truth, reparation and guarantees of non-reoccurrence in peace agreements. \\n Include victims in peace negotiation processes. \\n Reject amnesties for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and gross violations of human rights. \\n\\n Action points for donors \\n Donors for DDR programmes may consider comparative commitments to reparations for victims before or while the DDR process proceeds. \\n\\n Action points for DDR practitioners \\n Integrate human rights and transitional justice components into the training programmes and support materials for UN mediators and DDR practitioners, including of national DDR commissions. \\n\\n Action points for national DDR actors \\n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of the DDR programme. \\n Ensure that the DDR programme meets national and international obligations concerning account-ability, truth, reparations and guarantees of non-repetition.", + "Paragraph": "Box 5 Action points for mediators, donors, practitioners and national actors \n\n Action points for mediators and other participants in peacemaking \n Include obligations for accountability, truth, reparation and guarantees of non-reoccurrence in peace agreements. \n Include victims in peace negotiation processes. \n Reject amnesties for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and gross violations of human rights. \n\n Action points for donors \n Donors for DDR programmes may consider comparative commitments to reparations for victims before or while the DDR process proceeds. \n\n Action points for DDR practitioners \n Integrate human rights and transitional justice components into the training programmes and support materials for UN mediators and DDR practitioners, including of national DDR commissions. \n\n Action points for national DDR actors \n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of the DDR programme. \n Ensure that the DDR programme meets national and international obligations concerning account-ability, truth, reparations and guarantees of non-repetition.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -203070,14 +203070,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.1. Ensuring DDR that complies with international standards .", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Reject amnesties for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and gross violations of human rights.", + "Sentence": "\n Reject amnesties for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and gross violations of human rights.", "newParagraph": "box 5 action point mediator donor practitioner national actor nn action point mediator participant peacemaking n include obligation accountability truth reparation guarantee nonreoccurrence peace agreement n include victim peace negotiation process n reject amnesty genocide crime humanity war crime gross violation human right nn action point donor n donor ddr programme may consider comparative commitment reparation victim ddr process proceeds nn action point ddr practitioner n integrate human right transitional justice component training programme support material un mediator ddr practitioner including national ddr commission nn action point national ddr actor n incorporate commitment international humanitarian human right law design ddr programme n ensure ddr programme meet national international obligation concerning accountability truth reparation guarantee nonrepetition", "ProcessedSent": "n reject amnesty genocide crime humanity war crime gross violation human right", "SentID": 11281 }, { "ParagraphID": 3152, - "Paragraph": "Box 5 Action points for mediators, donors, practitioners and national actors \\n\\n Action points for mediators and other participants in peacemaking \\n Include obligations for accountability, truth, reparation and guarantees of non-reoccurrence in peace agreements. \\n Include victims in peace negotiation processes. \\n Reject amnesties for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and gross violations of human rights. \\n\\n Action points for donors \\n Donors for DDR programmes may consider comparative commitments to reparations for victims before or while the DDR process proceeds. \\n\\n Action points for DDR practitioners \\n Integrate human rights and transitional justice components into the training programmes and support materials for UN mediators and DDR practitioners, including of national DDR commissions. \\n\\n Action points for national DDR actors \\n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of the DDR programme. \\n Ensure that the DDR programme meets national and international obligations concerning account-ability, truth, reparations and guarantees of non-repetition.", + "Paragraph": "Box 5 Action points for mediators, donors, practitioners and national actors \n\n Action points for mediators and other participants in peacemaking \n Include obligations for accountability, truth, reparation and guarantees of non-reoccurrence in peace agreements. \n Include victims in peace negotiation processes. \n Reject amnesties for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and gross violations of human rights. \n\n Action points for donors \n Donors for DDR programmes may consider comparative commitments to reparations for victims before or while the DDR process proceeds. \n\n Action points for DDR practitioners \n Integrate human rights and transitional justice components into the training programmes and support materials for UN mediators and DDR practitioners, including of national DDR commissions. \n\n Action points for national DDR actors \n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of the DDR programme. \n Ensure that the DDR programme meets national and international obligations concerning account-ability, truth, reparations and guarantees of non-repetition.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -203088,14 +203088,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.1. Ensuring DDR that complies with international standards .", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Action points for donors \\n Donors for DDR programmes may consider comparative commitments to reparations for victims before or while the DDR process proceeds.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Action points for donors \n Donors for DDR programmes may consider comparative commitments to reparations for victims before or while the DDR process proceeds.", "newParagraph": "box 5 action point mediator donor practitioner national actor nn action point mediator participant peacemaking n include obligation accountability truth reparation guarantee nonreoccurrence peace agreement n include victim peace negotiation process n reject amnesty genocide crime humanity war crime gross violation human right nn action point donor n donor ddr programme may consider comparative commitment reparation victim ddr process proceeds nn action point ddr practitioner n integrate human right transitional justice component training programme support material un mediator ddr practitioner including national ddr commission nn action point national ddr actor n incorporate commitment international humanitarian human right law design ddr programme n ensure ddr programme meet national international obligation concerning accountability truth reparation guarantee nonrepetition", "ProcessedSent": "nn action point donor n donor ddr programme may consider comparative commitment reparation victim ddr process proceeds", "SentID": 11282 }, { "ParagraphID": 3152, - "Paragraph": "Box 5 Action points for mediators, donors, practitioners and national actors \\n\\n Action points for mediators and other participants in peacemaking \\n Include obligations for accountability, truth, reparation and guarantees of non-reoccurrence in peace agreements. \\n Include victims in peace negotiation processes. \\n Reject amnesties for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and gross violations of human rights. \\n\\n Action points for donors \\n Donors for DDR programmes may consider comparative commitments to reparations for victims before or while the DDR process proceeds. \\n\\n Action points for DDR practitioners \\n Integrate human rights and transitional justice components into the training programmes and support materials for UN mediators and DDR practitioners, including of national DDR commissions. \\n\\n Action points for national DDR actors \\n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of the DDR programme. \\n Ensure that the DDR programme meets national and international obligations concerning account-ability, truth, reparations and guarantees of non-repetition.", + "Paragraph": "Box 5 Action points for mediators, donors, practitioners and national actors \n\n Action points for mediators and other participants in peacemaking \n Include obligations for accountability, truth, reparation and guarantees of non-reoccurrence in peace agreements. \n Include victims in peace negotiation processes. \n Reject amnesties for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and gross violations of human rights. \n\n Action points for donors \n Donors for DDR programmes may consider comparative commitments to reparations for victims before or while the DDR process proceeds. \n\n Action points for DDR practitioners \n Integrate human rights and transitional justice components into the training programmes and support materials for UN mediators and DDR practitioners, including of national DDR commissions. \n\n Action points for national DDR actors \n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of the DDR programme. \n Ensure that the DDR programme meets national and international obligations concerning account-ability, truth, reparations and guarantees of non-repetition.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -203106,14 +203106,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.1. Ensuring DDR that complies with international standards .", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Action points for DDR practitioners \\n Integrate human rights and transitional justice components into the training programmes and support materials for UN mediators and DDR practitioners, including of national DDR commissions.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Action points for DDR practitioners \n Integrate human rights and transitional justice components into the training programmes and support materials for UN mediators and DDR practitioners, including of national DDR commissions.", "newParagraph": "box 5 action point mediator donor practitioner national actor nn action point mediator participant peacemaking n include obligation accountability truth reparation guarantee nonreoccurrence peace agreement n include victim peace negotiation process n reject amnesty genocide crime humanity war crime gross violation human right nn action point donor n donor ddr programme may consider comparative commitment reparation victim ddr process proceeds nn action point ddr practitioner n integrate human right transitional justice component training programme support material un mediator ddr practitioner including national ddr commission nn action point national ddr actor n incorporate commitment international humanitarian human right law design ddr programme n ensure ddr programme meet national international obligation concerning accountability truth reparation guarantee nonrepetition", "ProcessedSent": "nn action point ddr practitioner n integrate human right transitional justice component training programme support material un mediator ddr practitioner including national ddr commission", "SentID": 11283 }, { "ParagraphID": 3152, - "Paragraph": "Box 5 Action points for mediators, donors, practitioners and national actors \\n\\n Action points for mediators and other participants in peacemaking \\n Include obligations for accountability, truth, reparation and guarantees of non-reoccurrence in peace agreements. \\n Include victims in peace negotiation processes. \\n Reject amnesties for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and gross violations of human rights. \\n\\n Action points for donors \\n Donors for DDR programmes may consider comparative commitments to reparations for victims before or while the DDR process proceeds. \\n\\n Action points for DDR practitioners \\n Integrate human rights and transitional justice components into the training programmes and support materials for UN mediators and DDR practitioners, including of national DDR commissions. \\n\\n Action points for national DDR actors \\n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of the DDR programme. \\n Ensure that the DDR programme meets national and international obligations concerning account-ability, truth, reparations and guarantees of non-repetition.", + "Paragraph": "Box 5 Action points for mediators, donors, practitioners and national actors \n\n Action points for mediators and other participants in peacemaking \n Include obligations for accountability, truth, reparation and guarantees of non-reoccurrence in peace agreements. \n Include victims in peace negotiation processes. \n Reject amnesties for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and gross violations of human rights. \n\n Action points for donors \n Donors for DDR programmes may consider comparative commitments to reparations for victims before or while the DDR process proceeds. \n\n Action points for DDR practitioners \n Integrate human rights and transitional justice components into the training programmes and support materials for UN mediators and DDR practitioners, including of national DDR commissions. \n\n Action points for national DDR actors \n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of the DDR programme. \n Ensure that the DDR programme meets national and international obligations concerning account-ability, truth, reparations and guarantees of non-repetition.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -203124,14 +203124,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.1. Ensuring DDR that complies with international standards .", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Action points for national DDR actors \\n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of the DDR programme.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Action points for national DDR actors \n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of the DDR programme.", "newParagraph": "box 5 action point mediator donor practitioner national actor nn action point mediator participant peacemaking n include obligation accountability truth reparation guarantee nonreoccurrence peace agreement n include victim peace negotiation process n reject amnesty genocide crime humanity war crime gross violation human right nn action point donor n donor ddr programme may consider comparative commitment reparation victim ddr process proceeds nn action point ddr practitioner n integrate human right transitional justice component training programme support material un mediator ddr practitioner including national ddr commission nn action point national ddr actor n incorporate commitment international humanitarian human right law design ddr programme n ensure ddr programme meet national international obligation concerning accountability truth reparation guarantee nonrepetition", "ProcessedSent": "nn action point national ddr actor n incorporate commitment international humanitarian human right law design ddr programme", "SentID": 11284 }, { "ParagraphID": 3152, - "Paragraph": "Box 5 Action points for mediators, donors, practitioners and national actors \\n\\n Action points for mediators and other participants in peacemaking \\n Include obligations for accountability, truth, reparation and guarantees of non-reoccurrence in peace agreements. \\n Include victims in peace negotiation processes. \\n Reject amnesties for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and gross violations of human rights. \\n\\n Action points for donors \\n Donors for DDR programmes may consider comparative commitments to reparations for victims before or while the DDR process proceeds. \\n\\n Action points for DDR practitioners \\n Integrate human rights and transitional justice components into the training programmes and support materials for UN mediators and DDR practitioners, including of national DDR commissions. \\n\\n Action points for national DDR actors \\n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of the DDR programme. \\n Ensure that the DDR programme meets national and international obligations concerning account-ability, truth, reparations and guarantees of non-repetition.", + "Paragraph": "Box 5 Action points for mediators, donors, practitioners and national actors \n\n Action points for mediators and other participants in peacemaking \n Include obligations for accountability, truth, reparation and guarantees of non-reoccurrence in peace agreements. \n Include victims in peace negotiation processes. \n Reject amnesties for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and gross violations of human rights. \n\n Action points for donors \n Donors for DDR programmes may consider comparative commitments to reparations for victims before or while the DDR process proceeds. \n\n Action points for DDR practitioners \n Integrate human rights and transitional justice components into the training programmes and support materials for UN mediators and DDR practitioners, including of national DDR commissions. \n\n Action points for national DDR actors \n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of the DDR programme. \n Ensure that the DDR programme meets national and international obligations concerning account-ability, truth, reparations and guarantees of non-repetition.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -203142,7 +203142,7 @@ "Heading2": "8.1. Ensuring DDR that complies with international standards .", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Ensure that the DDR programme meets national and international obligations concerning account-ability, truth, reparations and guarantees of non-repetition.", + "Sentence": "\n Ensure that the DDR programme meets national and international obligations concerning account-ability, truth, reparations and guarantees of non-repetition.", "newParagraph": "box 5 action point mediator donor practitioner national actor nn action point mediator participant peacemaking n include obligation accountability truth reparation guarantee nonreoccurrence peace agreement n include victim peace negotiation process n reject amnesty genocide crime humanity war crime gross violation human right nn action point donor n donor ddr programme may consider comparative commitment reparation victim ddr process proceeds nn action point ddr practitioner n integrate human right transitional justice component training programme support material un mediator ddr practitioner including national ddr commission nn action point national ddr actor n incorporate commitment international humanitarian human right law design ddr programme n ensure ddr programme meet national international obligation concerning accountability truth reparation guarantee nonrepetition", "ProcessedSent": "n ensure ddr programme meet national international obligation concerning accountability truth reparation guarantee nonrepetition", "SentID": 11285 @@ -203275,7 +203275,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3155, - "Paragraph": "It has been recognized that amnesties can play a valuable role in ending armed conflicts and reconciling divided communities, provided that they do not grant immunity to indi- viduals responsible for serious violations of international law. Under international law and UN policy, amnesties are impermissible if they: \\n prevent prosecution of those who may be responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and gross violations of human rights: \\n violate victims\u2019 rights to an effective remedy and to the truth; \\n Such broad amnesties may also undermine the law\u2019s function as a deterrent against crime and may create the impression that serious international crimes may be com- mitted with impunity.", + "Paragraph": "It has been recognized that amnesties can play a valuable role in ending armed conflicts and reconciling divided communities, provided that they do not grant immunity to indi- viduals responsible for serious violations of international law. Under international law and UN policy, amnesties are impermissible if they: \n prevent prosecution of those who may be responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and gross violations of human rights: \n violate victims\u2019 rights to an effective remedy and to the truth; \n Such broad amnesties may also undermine the law\u2019s function as a deterrent against crime and may create the impression that serious international crimes may be com- mitted with impunity.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -203293,7 +203293,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3155, - "Paragraph": "It has been recognized that amnesties can play a valuable role in ending armed conflicts and reconciling divided communities, provided that they do not grant immunity to indi- viduals responsible for serious violations of international law. Under international law and UN policy, amnesties are impermissible if they: \\n prevent prosecution of those who may be responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and gross violations of human rights: \\n violate victims\u2019 rights to an effective remedy and to the truth; \\n Such broad amnesties may also undermine the law\u2019s function as a deterrent against crime and may create the impression that serious international crimes may be com- mitted with impunity.", + "Paragraph": "It has been recognized that amnesties can play a valuable role in ending armed conflicts and reconciling divided communities, provided that they do not grant immunity to indi- viduals responsible for serious violations of international law. Under international law and UN policy, amnesties are impermissible if they: \n prevent prosecution of those who may be responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and gross violations of human rights: \n violate victims\u2019 rights to an effective remedy and to the truth; \n Such broad amnesties may also undermine the law\u2019s function as a deterrent against crime and may create the impression that serious international crimes may be com- mitted with impunity.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -203304,7 +203304,7 @@ "Heading2": "8.1. Ensuring DDR that complies with international standards .", "Heading3": "8.1.3. Reject amnesties for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and gross violations of human rights", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Under international law and UN policy, amnesties are impermissible if they: \\n prevent prosecution of those who may be responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and gross violations of human rights: \\n violate victims\u2019 rights to an effective remedy and to the truth; \\n Such broad amnesties may also undermine the law\u2019s function as a deterrent against crime and may create the impression that serious international crimes may be com- mitted with impunity.", + "Sentence": "Under international law and UN policy, amnesties are impermissible if they: \n prevent prosecution of those who may be responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and gross violations of human rights: \n violate victims\u2019 rights to an effective remedy and to the truth; \n Such broad amnesties may also undermine the law\u2019s function as a deterrent against crime and may create the impression that serious international crimes may be com- mitted with impunity.", "newParagraph": "recognized amnesty play valuable role ending armed conflict reconciling divided community provided grant immunity indi viduals responsible serious violation international law international law un policy amnesty impermissible n prevent prosecution may responsible genocide crime humanity war crime gross violation human right n violate victim right effective remedy truth n broad amnesty may also undermine law function deterrent crime may create impression serious international crime may com mitted impunity", "ProcessedSent": "international law un policy amnesty impermissible n prevent prosecution may responsible genocide crime humanity war crime gross violation human right n violate victim right effective remedy truth n broad amnesty may also undermine law function deterrent crime may create impression serious international crime may com mitted impunity", "SentID": 11294 @@ -203419,7 +203419,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3159, - "Paragraph": "Box 6 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \\n Action points for DDR practitioners \\n Integrate information on transitional justice measures into the field assessment. (See Annex B for a list of critical questions.) \\n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of DDR programmes. \\n Identify a transitional justice focal point in the DDR programme and plan regular briefings and meetings with UN and national authorities working on transitional justice measures. \\n Coordinate on public information and outreach. \\n Integrate information on transitional justice into the ex-combatant discharge awareness raising process. \\n Involve and prepare recipient communities. \\n Consider community based reintegration approaches. \\n Action points for TJ practitioners \\n Designate a DDR focal point \\n Integrate information on DDR in conflict analysis, assessments and evaluations undertaken to support or advance transitional justice initiatives.", + "Paragraph": "Box 6 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \n Action points for DDR practitioners \n Integrate information on transitional justice measures into the field assessment. (See Annex B for a list of critical questions.) \n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of DDR programmes. \n Identify a transitional justice focal point in the DDR programme and plan regular briefings and meetings with UN and national authorities working on transitional justice measures. \n Coordinate on public information and outreach. \n Integrate information on transitional justice into the ex-combatant discharge awareness raising process. \n Involve and prepare recipient communities. \n Consider community based reintegration approaches. \n Action points for TJ practitioners \n Designate a DDR focal point \n Integrate information on DDR in conflict analysis, assessments and evaluations undertaken to support or advance transitional justice initiatives.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -203430,14 +203430,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.2. Designing DDR programmes that \u201cdo no harm\u201d", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Box 6 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \\n Action points for DDR practitioners \\n Integrate information on transitional justice measures into the field assessment.", + "Sentence": "Box 6 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \n Action points for DDR practitioners \n Integrate information on transitional justice measures into the field assessment.", "newParagraph": "box 6 action point ddr tj practitioner n action point ddr practitioner n integrate information transitional justice measure field assessment see annex b list critical question n incorporate commitment international humanitarian human right law design ddr programme n identify transitional justice focal point ddr programme plan regular briefing meeting un national authority working transitional justice measure n coordinate public information outreach n integrate information transitional justice excombatant discharge awareness raising process n involve prepare recipient community n consider community based reintegration approach n action point tj practitioner n designate ddr focal point n integrate information ddr conflict analysis assessment evaluation undertaken support advance transitional justice initiative", "ProcessedSent": "box 6 action point ddr tj practitioner n action point ddr practitioner n integrate information transitional justice measure field assessment", "SentID": 11301 }, { "ParagraphID": 3159, - "Paragraph": "Box 6 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \\n Action points for DDR practitioners \\n Integrate information on transitional justice measures into the field assessment. (See Annex B for a list of critical questions.) \\n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of DDR programmes. \\n Identify a transitional justice focal point in the DDR programme and plan regular briefings and meetings with UN and national authorities working on transitional justice measures. \\n Coordinate on public information and outreach. \\n Integrate information on transitional justice into the ex-combatant discharge awareness raising process. \\n Involve and prepare recipient communities. \\n Consider community based reintegration approaches. \\n Action points for TJ practitioners \\n Designate a DDR focal point \\n Integrate information on DDR in conflict analysis, assessments and evaluations undertaken to support or advance transitional justice initiatives.", + "Paragraph": "Box 6 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \n Action points for DDR practitioners \n Integrate information on transitional justice measures into the field assessment. (See Annex B for a list of critical questions.) \n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of DDR programmes. \n Identify a transitional justice focal point in the DDR programme and plan regular briefings and meetings with UN and national authorities working on transitional justice measures. \n Coordinate on public information and outreach. \n Integrate information on transitional justice into the ex-combatant discharge awareness raising process. \n Involve and prepare recipient communities. \n Consider community based reintegration approaches. \n Action points for TJ practitioners \n Designate a DDR focal point \n Integrate information on DDR in conflict analysis, assessments and evaluations undertaken to support or advance transitional justice initiatives.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -203455,7 +203455,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3159, - "Paragraph": "Box 6 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \\n Action points for DDR practitioners \\n Integrate information on transitional justice measures into the field assessment. (See Annex B for a list of critical questions.) \\n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of DDR programmes. \\n Identify a transitional justice focal point in the DDR programme and plan regular briefings and meetings with UN and national authorities working on transitional justice measures. \\n Coordinate on public information and outreach. \\n Integrate information on transitional justice into the ex-combatant discharge awareness raising process. \\n Involve and prepare recipient communities. \\n Consider community based reintegration approaches. \\n Action points for TJ practitioners \\n Designate a DDR focal point \\n Integrate information on DDR in conflict analysis, assessments and evaluations undertaken to support or advance transitional justice initiatives.", + "Paragraph": "Box 6 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \n Action points for DDR practitioners \n Integrate information on transitional justice measures into the field assessment. (See Annex B for a list of critical questions.) \n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of DDR programmes. \n Identify a transitional justice focal point in the DDR programme and plan regular briefings and meetings with UN and national authorities working on transitional justice measures. \n Coordinate on public information and outreach. \n Integrate information on transitional justice into the ex-combatant discharge awareness raising process. \n Involve and prepare recipient communities. \n Consider community based reintegration approaches. \n Action points for TJ practitioners \n Designate a DDR focal point \n Integrate information on DDR in conflict analysis, assessments and evaluations undertaken to support or advance transitional justice initiatives.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -203466,14 +203466,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.2. Designing DDR programmes that \u201cdo no harm\u201d", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of DDR programmes.", + "Sentence": "\n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of DDR programmes.", "newParagraph": "box 6 action point ddr tj practitioner n action point ddr practitioner n integrate information transitional justice measure field assessment see annex b list critical question n incorporate commitment international humanitarian human right law design ddr programme n identify transitional justice focal point ddr programme plan regular briefing meeting un national authority working transitional justice measure n coordinate public information outreach n integrate information transitional justice excombatant discharge awareness raising process n involve prepare recipient community n consider community based reintegration approach n action point tj practitioner n designate ddr focal point n integrate information ddr conflict analysis assessment evaluation undertaken support advance transitional justice initiative", "ProcessedSent": "n incorporate commitment international humanitarian human right law design ddr programme", "SentID": 11303 }, { "ParagraphID": 3159, - "Paragraph": "Box 6 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \\n Action points for DDR practitioners \\n Integrate information on transitional justice measures into the field assessment. (See Annex B for a list of critical questions.) \\n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of DDR programmes. \\n Identify a transitional justice focal point in the DDR programme and plan regular briefings and meetings with UN and national authorities working on transitional justice measures. \\n Coordinate on public information and outreach. \\n Integrate information on transitional justice into the ex-combatant discharge awareness raising process. \\n Involve and prepare recipient communities. \\n Consider community based reintegration approaches. \\n Action points for TJ practitioners \\n Designate a DDR focal point \\n Integrate information on DDR in conflict analysis, assessments and evaluations undertaken to support or advance transitional justice initiatives.", + "Paragraph": "Box 6 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \n Action points for DDR practitioners \n Integrate information on transitional justice measures into the field assessment. (See Annex B for a list of critical questions.) \n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of DDR programmes. \n Identify a transitional justice focal point in the DDR programme and plan regular briefings and meetings with UN and national authorities working on transitional justice measures. \n Coordinate on public information and outreach. \n Integrate information on transitional justice into the ex-combatant discharge awareness raising process. \n Involve and prepare recipient communities. \n Consider community based reintegration approaches. \n Action points for TJ practitioners \n Designate a DDR focal point \n Integrate information on DDR in conflict analysis, assessments and evaluations undertaken to support or advance transitional justice initiatives.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -203484,14 +203484,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.2. Designing DDR programmes that \u201cdo no harm\u201d", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Identify a transitional justice focal point in the DDR programme and plan regular briefings and meetings with UN and national authorities working on transitional justice measures.", + "Sentence": "\n Identify a transitional justice focal point in the DDR programme and plan regular briefings and meetings with UN and national authorities working on transitional justice measures.", "newParagraph": "box 6 action point ddr tj practitioner n action point ddr practitioner n integrate information transitional justice measure field assessment see annex b list critical question n incorporate commitment international humanitarian human right law design ddr programme n identify transitional justice focal point ddr programme plan regular briefing meeting un national authority working transitional justice measure n coordinate public information outreach n integrate information transitional justice excombatant discharge awareness raising process n involve prepare recipient community n consider community based reintegration approach n action point tj practitioner n designate ddr focal point n integrate information ddr conflict analysis assessment evaluation undertaken support advance transitional justice initiative", "ProcessedSent": "n identify transitional justice focal point ddr programme plan regular briefing meeting un national authority working transitional justice measure", "SentID": 11304 }, { "ParagraphID": 3159, - "Paragraph": "Box 6 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \\n Action points for DDR practitioners \\n Integrate information on transitional justice measures into the field assessment. (See Annex B for a list of critical questions.) \\n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of DDR programmes. \\n Identify a transitional justice focal point in the DDR programme and plan regular briefings and meetings with UN and national authorities working on transitional justice measures. \\n Coordinate on public information and outreach. \\n Integrate information on transitional justice into the ex-combatant discharge awareness raising process. \\n Involve and prepare recipient communities. \\n Consider community based reintegration approaches. \\n Action points for TJ practitioners \\n Designate a DDR focal point \\n Integrate information on DDR in conflict analysis, assessments and evaluations undertaken to support or advance transitional justice initiatives.", + "Paragraph": "Box 6 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \n Action points for DDR practitioners \n Integrate information on transitional justice measures into the field assessment. (See Annex B for a list of critical questions.) \n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of DDR programmes. \n Identify a transitional justice focal point in the DDR programme and plan regular briefings and meetings with UN and national authorities working on transitional justice measures. \n Coordinate on public information and outreach. \n Integrate information on transitional justice into the ex-combatant discharge awareness raising process. \n Involve and prepare recipient communities. \n Consider community based reintegration approaches. \n Action points for TJ practitioners \n Designate a DDR focal point \n Integrate information on DDR in conflict analysis, assessments and evaluations undertaken to support or advance transitional justice initiatives.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -203502,14 +203502,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.2. Designing DDR programmes that \u201cdo no harm\u201d", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Coordinate on public information and outreach.", + "Sentence": "\n Coordinate on public information and outreach.", "newParagraph": "box 6 action point ddr tj practitioner n action point ddr practitioner n integrate information transitional justice measure field assessment see annex b list critical question n incorporate commitment international humanitarian human right law design ddr programme n identify transitional justice focal point ddr programme plan regular briefing meeting un national authority working transitional justice measure n coordinate public information outreach n integrate information transitional justice excombatant discharge awareness raising process n involve prepare recipient community n consider community based reintegration approach n action point tj practitioner n designate ddr focal point n integrate information ddr conflict analysis assessment evaluation undertaken support advance transitional justice initiative", "ProcessedSent": "n coordinate public information outreach", "SentID": 11305 }, { "ParagraphID": 3159, - "Paragraph": "Box 6 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \\n Action points for DDR practitioners \\n Integrate information on transitional justice measures into the field assessment. (See Annex B for a list of critical questions.) \\n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of DDR programmes. \\n Identify a transitional justice focal point in the DDR programme and plan regular briefings and meetings with UN and national authorities working on transitional justice measures. \\n Coordinate on public information and outreach. \\n Integrate information on transitional justice into the ex-combatant discharge awareness raising process. \\n Involve and prepare recipient communities. \\n Consider community based reintegration approaches. \\n Action points for TJ practitioners \\n Designate a DDR focal point \\n Integrate information on DDR in conflict analysis, assessments and evaluations undertaken to support or advance transitional justice initiatives.", + "Paragraph": "Box 6 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \n Action points for DDR practitioners \n Integrate information on transitional justice measures into the field assessment. (See Annex B for a list of critical questions.) \n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of DDR programmes. \n Identify a transitional justice focal point in the DDR programme and plan regular briefings and meetings with UN and national authorities working on transitional justice measures. \n Coordinate on public information and outreach. \n Integrate information on transitional justice into the ex-combatant discharge awareness raising process. \n Involve and prepare recipient communities. \n Consider community based reintegration approaches. \n Action points for TJ practitioners \n Designate a DDR focal point \n Integrate information on DDR in conflict analysis, assessments and evaluations undertaken to support or advance transitional justice initiatives.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -203520,14 +203520,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.2. Designing DDR programmes that \u201cdo no harm\u201d", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Integrate information on transitional justice into the ex-combatant discharge awareness raising process.", + "Sentence": "\n Integrate information on transitional justice into the ex-combatant discharge awareness raising process.", "newParagraph": "box 6 action point ddr tj practitioner n action point ddr practitioner n integrate information transitional justice measure field assessment see annex b list critical question n incorporate commitment international humanitarian human right law design ddr programme n identify transitional justice focal point ddr programme plan regular briefing meeting un national authority working transitional justice measure n coordinate public information outreach n integrate information transitional justice excombatant discharge awareness raising process n involve prepare recipient community n consider community based reintegration approach n action point tj practitioner n designate ddr focal point n integrate information ddr conflict analysis assessment evaluation undertaken support advance transitional justice initiative", "ProcessedSent": "n integrate information transitional justice excombatant discharge awareness raising process", "SentID": 11306 }, { "ParagraphID": 3159, - "Paragraph": "Box 6 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \\n Action points for DDR practitioners \\n Integrate information on transitional justice measures into the field assessment. (See Annex B for a list of critical questions.) \\n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of DDR programmes. \\n Identify a transitional justice focal point in the DDR programme and plan regular briefings and meetings with UN and national authorities working on transitional justice measures. \\n Coordinate on public information and outreach. \\n Integrate information on transitional justice into the ex-combatant discharge awareness raising process. \\n Involve and prepare recipient communities. \\n Consider community based reintegration approaches. \\n Action points for TJ practitioners \\n Designate a DDR focal point \\n Integrate information on DDR in conflict analysis, assessments and evaluations undertaken to support or advance transitional justice initiatives.", + "Paragraph": "Box 6 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \n Action points for DDR practitioners \n Integrate information on transitional justice measures into the field assessment. (See Annex B for a list of critical questions.) \n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of DDR programmes. \n Identify a transitional justice focal point in the DDR programme and plan regular briefings and meetings with UN and national authorities working on transitional justice measures. \n Coordinate on public information and outreach. \n Integrate information on transitional justice into the ex-combatant discharge awareness raising process. \n Involve and prepare recipient communities. \n Consider community based reintegration approaches. \n Action points for TJ practitioners \n Designate a DDR focal point \n Integrate information on DDR in conflict analysis, assessments and evaluations undertaken to support or advance transitional justice initiatives.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -203538,14 +203538,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.2. Designing DDR programmes that \u201cdo no harm\u201d", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Involve and prepare recipient communities.", + "Sentence": "\n Involve and prepare recipient communities.", "newParagraph": "box 6 action point ddr tj practitioner n action point ddr practitioner n integrate information transitional justice measure field assessment see annex b list critical question n incorporate commitment international humanitarian human right law design ddr programme n identify transitional justice focal point ddr programme plan regular briefing meeting un national authority working transitional justice measure n coordinate public information outreach n integrate information transitional justice excombatant discharge awareness raising process n involve prepare recipient community n consider community based reintegration approach n action point tj practitioner n designate ddr focal point n integrate information ddr conflict analysis assessment evaluation undertaken support advance transitional justice initiative", "ProcessedSent": "n involve prepare recipient community", "SentID": 11307 }, { "ParagraphID": 3159, - "Paragraph": "Box 6 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \\n Action points for DDR practitioners \\n Integrate information on transitional justice measures into the field assessment. (See Annex B for a list of critical questions.) \\n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of DDR programmes. \\n Identify a transitional justice focal point in the DDR programme and plan regular briefings and meetings with UN and national authorities working on transitional justice measures. \\n Coordinate on public information and outreach. \\n Integrate information on transitional justice into the ex-combatant discharge awareness raising process. \\n Involve and prepare recipient communities. \\n Consider community based reintegration approaches. \\n Action points for TJ practitioners \\n Designate a DDR focal point \\n Integrate information on DDR in conflict analysis, assessments and evaluations undertaken to support or advance transitional justice initiatives.", + "Paragraph": "Box 6 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \n Action points for DDR practitioners \n Integrate information on transitional justice measures into the field assessment. (See Annex B for a list of critical questions.) \n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of DDR programmes. \n Identify a transitional justice focal point in the DDR programme and plan regular briefings and meetings with UN and national authorities working on transitional justice measures. \n Coordinate on public information and outreach. \n Integrate information on transitional justice into the ex-combatant discharge awareness raising process. \n Involve and prepare recipient communities. \n Consider community based reintegration approaches. \n Action points for TJ practitioners \n Designate a DDR focal point \n Integrate information on DDR in conflict analysis, assessments and evaluations undertaken to support or advance transitional justice initiatives.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -203556,14 +203556,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.2. Designing DDR programmes that \u201cdo no harm\u201d", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Consider community based reintegration approaches.", + "Sentence": "\n Consider community based reintegration approaches.", "newParagraph": "box 6 action point ddr tj practitioner n action point ddr practitioner n integrate information transitional justice measure field assessment see annex b list critical question n incorporate commitment international humanitarian human right law design ddr programme n identify transitional justice focal point ddr programme plan regular briefing meeting un national authority working transitional justice measure n coordinate public information outreach n integrate information transitional justice excombatant discharge awareness raising process n involve prepare recipient community n consider community based reintegration approach n action point tj practitioner n designate ddr focal point n integrate information ddr conflict analysis assessment evaluation undertaken support advance transitional justice initiative", "ProcessedSent": "n consider community based reintegration approach", "SentID": 11308 }, { "ParagraphID": 3159, - "Paragraph": "Box 6 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \\n Action points for DDR practitioners \\n Integrate information on transitional justice measures into the field assessment. (See Annex B for a list of critical questions.) \\n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of DDR programmes. \\n Identify a transitional justice focal point in the DDR programme and plan regular briefings and meetings with UN and national authorities working on transitional justice measures. \\n Coordinate on public information and outreach. \\n Integrate information on transitional justice into the ex-combatant discharge awareness raising process. \\n Involve and prepare recipient communities. \\n Consider community based reintegration approaches. \\n Action points for TJ practitioners \\n Designate a DDR focal point \\n Integrate information on DDR in conflict analysis, assessments and evaluations undertaken to support or advance transitional justice initiatives.", + "Paragraph": "Box 6 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \n Action points for DDR practitioners \n Integrate information on transitional justice measures into the field assessment. (See Annex B for a list of critical questions.) \n Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human rights law into the design of DDR programmes. \n Identify a transitional justice focal point in the DDR programme and plan regular briefings and meetings with UN and national authorities working on transitional justice measures. \n Coordinate on public information and outreach. \n Integrate information on transitional justice into the ex-combatant discharge awareness raising process. \n Involve and prepare recipient communities. \n Consider community based reintegration approaches. \n Action points for TJ practitioners \n Designate a DDR focal point \n Integrate information on DDR in conflict analysis, assessments and evaluations undertaken to support or advance transitional justice initiatives.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -203574,7 +203574,7 @@ "Heading2": "8.2. Designing DDR programmes that \u201cdo no harm\u201d", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Action points for TJ practitioners \\n Designate a DDR focal point \\n Integrate information on DDR in conflict analysis, assessments and evaluations undertaken to support or advance transitional justice initiatives.", + "Sentence": "\n Action points for TJ practitioners \n Designate a DDR focal point \n Integrate information on DDR in conflict analysis, assessments and evaluations undertaken to support or advance transitional justice initiatives.", "newParagraph": "box 6 action point ddr tj practitioner n action point ddr practitioner n integrate information transitional justice measure field assessment see annex b list critical question n incorporate commitment international humanitarian human right law design ddr programme n identify transitional justice focal point ddr programme plan regular briefing meeting un national authority working transitional justice measure n coordinate public information outreach n integrate information transitional justice excombatant discharge awareness raising process n involve prepare recipient community n consider community based reintegration approach n action point tj practitioner n designate ddr focal point n integrate information ddr conflict analysis assessment evaluation undertaken support advance transitional justice initiative", "ProcessedSent": "n action point tj practitioner n designate ddr focal point n integrate information ddr conflict analysis assessment evaluation undertaken support advance transitional justice initiative", "SentID": 11309 @@ -203671,7 +203671,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3161, - "Paragraph": "DDR programmes supported by the UN are committed to respect, ensure respect for, and implement international humanitarian and human rights law (see Module 2.1, section 5.15). This means protecting the rights of those who participate in DDR programmes, as well as the rights of the members of the communities who are asked to receive and integrate ex-combatants. DDR programmes that uphold humanitarian and human rights law and hold accountable those who violate the law are likely to be perceived as more legitimate processes by both the ex-combatants, who are their immediate beneficiaries, and the society as a whole. Procedures that affirm this commitment may include the following: \\n 1. International and national staff shall be trained as to their obligations under international law; \\n 2. Rules and regulations aimed at protecting human rights and upholding international humanitarian law shall be developed, posted, and communicated to staff and all ex- combatants who participate in DDR. \\n 3.Additionally, an appropriate means of reporting and penalizing those who violate international or national law to the appropriate authorities shall be created and made available to staff, participating ex-combatants, and members of recipient communities.", + "Paragraph": "DDR programmes supported by the UN are committed to respect, ensure respect for, and implement international humanitarian and human rights law (see Module 2.1, section 5.15). This means protecting the rights of those who participate in DDR programmes, as well as the rights of the members of the communities who are asked to receive and integrate ex-combatants. DDR programmes that uphold humanitarian and human rights law and hold accountable those who violate the law are likely to be perceived as more legitimate processes by both the ex-combatants, who are their immediate beneficiaries, and the society as a whole. Procedures that affirm this commitment may include the following: \n 1. International and national staff shall be trained as to their obligations under international law; \n 2. Rules and regulations aimed at protecting human rights and upholding international humanitarian law shall be developed, posted, and communicated to staff and all ex- combatants who participate in DDR. \n 3.Additionally, an appropriate means of reporting and penalizing those who violate international or national law to the appropriate authorities shall be created and made available to staff, participating ex-combatants, and members of recipient communities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -203689,7 +203689,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3161, - "Paragraph": "DDR programmes supported by the UN are committed to respect, ensure respect for, and implement international humanitarian and human rights law (see Module 2.1, section 5.15). This means protecting the rights of those who participate in DDR programmes, as well as the rights of the members of the communities who are asked to receive and integrate ex-combatants. DDR programmes that uphold humanitarian and human rights law and hold accountable those who violate the law are likely to be perceived as more legitimate processes by both the ex-combatants, who are their immediate beneficiaries, and the society as a whole. Procedures that affirm this commitment may include the following: \\n 1. International and national staff shall be trained as to their obligations under international law; \\n 2. Rules and regulations aimed at protecting human rights and upholding international humanitarian law shall be developed, posted, and communicated to staff and all ex- combatants who participate in DDR. \\n 3.Additionally, an appropriate means of reporting and penalizing those who violate international or national law to the appropriate authorities shall be created and made available to staff, participating ex-combatants, and members of recipient communities.", + "Paragraph": "DDR programmes supported by the UN are committed to respect, ensure respect for, and implement international humanitarian and human rights law (see Module 2.1, section 5.15). This means protecting the rights of those who participate in DDR programmes, as well as the rights of the members of the communities who are asked to receive and integrate ex-combatants. DDR programmes that uphold humanitarian and human rights law and hold accountable those who violate the law are likely to be perceived as more legitimate processes by both the ex-combatants, who are their immediate beneficiaries, and the society as a whole. Procedures that affirm this commitment may include the following: \n 1. International and national staff shall be trained as to their obligations under international law; \n 2. Rules and regulations aimed at protecting human rights and upholding international humanitarian law shall be developed, posted, and communicated to staff and all ex- combatants who participate in DDR. \n 3.Additionally, an appropriate means of reporting and penalizing those who violate international or national law to the appropriate authorities shall be created and made available to staff, participating ex-combatants, and members of recipient communities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -203707,7 +203707,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3161, - "Paragraph": "DDR programmes supported by the UN are committed to respect, ensure respect for, and implement international humanitarian and human rights law (see Module 2.1, section 5.15). This means protecting the rights of those who participate in DDR programmes, as well as the rights of the members of the communities who are asked to receive and integrate ex-combatants. DDR programmes that uphold humanitarian and human rights law and hold accountable those who violate the law are likely to be perceived as more legitimate processes by both the ex-combatants, who are their immediate beneficiaries, and the society as a whole. Procedures that affirm this commitment may include the following: \\n 1. International and national staff shall be trained as to their obligations under international law; \\n 2. Rules and regulations aimed at protecting human rights and upholding international humanitarian law shall be developed, posted, and communicated to staff and all ex- combatants who participate in DDR. \\n 3.Additionally, an appropriate means of reporting and penalizing those who violate international or national law to the appropriate authorities shall be created and made available to staff, participating ex-combatants, and members of recipient communities.", + "Paragraph": "DDR programmes supported by the UN are committed to respect, ensure respect for, and implement international humanitarian and human rights law (see Module 2.1, section 5.15). This means protecting the rights of those who participate in DDR programmes, as well as the rights of the members of the communities who are asked to receive and integrate ex-combatants. DDR programmes that uphold humanitarian and human rights law and hold accountable those who violate the law are likely to be perceived as more legitimate processes by both the ex-combatants, who are their immediate beneficiaries, and the society as a whole. Procedures that affirm this commitment may include the following: \n 1. International and national staff shall be trained as to their obligations under international law; \n 2. Rules and regulations aimed at protecting human rights and upholding international humanitarian law shall be developed, posted, and communicated to staff and all ex- combatants who participate in DDR. \n 3.Additionally, an appropriate means of reporting and penalizing those who violate international or national law to the appropriate authorities shall be created and made available to staff, participating ex-combatants, and members of recipient communities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -203725,7 +203725,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3161, - "Paragraph": "DDR programmes supported by the UN are committed to respect, ensure respect for, and implement international humanitarian and human rights law (see Module 2.1, section 5.15). This means protecting the rights of those who participate in DDR programmes, as well as the rights of the members of the communities who are asked to receive and integrate ex-combatants. DDR programmes that uphold humanitarian and human rights law and hold accountable those who violate the law are likely to be perceived as more legitimate processes by both the ex-combatants, who are their immediate beneficiaries, and the society as a whole. Procedures that affirm this commitment may include the following: \\n 1. International and national staff shall be trained as to their obligations under international law; \\n 2. Rules and regulations aimed at protecting human rights and upholding international humanitarian law shall be developed, posted, and communicated to staff and all ex- combatants who participate in DDR. \\n 3.Additionally, an appropriate means of reporting and penalizing those who violate international or national law to the appropriate authorities shall be created and made available to staff, participating ex-combatants, and members of recipient communities.", + "Paragraph": "DDR programmes supported by the UN are committed to respect, ensure respect for, and implement international humanitarian and human rights law (see Module 2.1, section 5.15). This means protecting the rights of those who participate in DDR programmes, as well as the rights of the members of the communities who are asked to receive and integrate ex-combatants. DDR programmes that uphold humanitarian and human rights law and hold accountable those who violate the law are likely to be perceived as more legitimate processes by both the ex-combatants, who are their immediate beneficiaries, and the society as a whole. Procedures that affirm this commitment may include the following: \n 1. International and national staff shall be trained as to their obligations under international law; \n 2. Rules and regulations aimed at protecting human rights and upholding international humanitarian law shall be developed, posted, and communicated to staff and all ex- combatants who participate in DDR. \n 3.Additionally, an appropriate means of reporting and penalizing those who violate international or national law to the appropriate authorities shall be created and made available to staff, participating ex-combatants, and members of recipient communities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -203736,14 +203736,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.2. Designing DDR programmes that \u201cdo no harm\u201d", "Heading3": "8.2.2. Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human right law into the design of DDR programmes", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Procedures that affirm this commitment may include the following: \\n 1. International and national staff shall be trained as to their obligations under international law; \\n 2.", + "Sentence": "Procedures that affirm this commitment may include the following: \n 1. International and national staff shall be trained as to their obligations under international law; \n 2.", "newParagraph": "ddr programme supported un committed respect ensure respect implement international humanitarian human right law see module 21 section 515 mean protecting right participate ddr programme well right member community asked receive integrate excombatants ddr programme uphold humanitarian human right law hold accountable violate law likely perceived legitimate process excombatants immediate beneficiary society whole procedure affirm commitment may include following n 1 international national staff shall trained obligation international law n 2 rule regulation aimed protecting human right upholding international humanitarian law shall developed posted communicated staff ex combatant participate ddr n 3additionally appropriate mean reporting penalizing violate international national law appropriate authority shall created made available staff participating excombatants member recipient community", "ProcessedSent": "procedure affirm commitment may include following n 1 international national staff shall trained obligation international law n 2", "SentID": 11318 }, { "ParagraphID": 3161, - "Paragraph": "DDR programmes supported by the UN are committed to respect, ensure respect for, and implement international humanitarian and human rights law (see Module 2.1, section 5.15). This means protecting the rights of those who participate in DDR programmes, as well as the rights of the members of the communities who are asked to receive and integrate ex-combatants. DDR programmes that uphold humanitarian and human rights law and hold accountable those who violate the law are likely to be perceived as more legitimate processes by both the ex-combatants, who are their immediate beneficiaries, and the society as a whole. Procedures that affirm this commitment may include the following: \\n 1. International and national staff shall be trained as to their obligations under international law; \\n 2. Rules and regulations aimed at protecting human rights and upholding international humanitarian law shall be developed, posted, and communicated to staff and all ex- combatants who participate in DDR. \\n 3.Additionally, an appropriate means of reporting and penalizing those who violate international or national law to the appropriate authorities shall be created and made available to staff, participating ex-combatants, and members of recipient communities.", + "Paragraph": "DDR programmes supported by the UN are committed to respect, ensure respect for, and implement international humanitarian and human rights law (see Module 2.1, section 5.15). This means protecting the rights of those who participate in DDR programmes, as well as the rights of the members of the communities who are asked to receive and integrate ex-combatants. DDR programmes that uphold humanitarian and human rights law and hold accountable those who violate the law are likely to be perceived as more legitimate processes by both the ex-combatants, who are their immediate beneficiaries, and the society as a whole. Procedures that affirm this commitment may include the following: \n 1. International and national staff shall be trained as to their obligations under international law; \n 2. Rules and regulations aimed at protecting human rights and upholding international humanitarian law shall be developed, posted, and communicated to staff and all ex- combatants who participate in DDR. \n 3.Additionally, an appropriate means of reporting and penalizing those who violate international or national law to the appropriate authorities shall be created and made available to staff, participating ex-combatants, and members of recipient communities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -203761,7 +203761,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3161, - "Paragraph": "DDR programmes supported by the UN are committed to respect, ensure respect for, and implement international humanitarian and human rights law (see Module 2.1, section 5.15). This means protecting the rights of those who participate in DDR programmes, as well as the rights of the members of the communities who are asked to receive and integrate ex-combatants. DDR programmes that uphold humanitarian and human rights law and hold accountable those who violate the law are likely to be perceived as more legitimate processes by both the ex-combatants, who are their immediate beneficiaries, and the society as a whole. Procedures that affirm this commitment may include the following: \\n 1. International and national staff shall be trained as to their obligations under international law; \\n 2. Rules and regulations aimed at protecting human rights and upholding international humanitarian law shall be developed, posted, and communicated to staff and all ex- combatants who participate in DDR. \\n 3.Additionally, an appropriate means of reporting and penalizing those who violate international or national law to the appropriate authorities shall be created and made available to staff, participating ex-combatants, and members of recipient communities.", + "Paragraph": "DDR programmes supported by the UN are committed to respect, ensure respect for, and implement international humanitarian and human rights law (see Module 2.1, section 5.15). This means protecting the rights of those who participate in DDR programmes, as well as the rights of the members of the communities who are asked to receive and integrate ex-combatants. DDR programmes that uphold humanitarian and human rights law and hold accountable those who violate the law are likely to be perceived as more legitimate processes by both the ex-combatants, who are their immediate beneficiaries, and the society as a whole. Procedures that affirm this commitment may include the following: \n 1. International and national staff shall be trained as to their obligations under international law; \n 2. Rules and regulations aimed at protecting human rights and upholding international humanitarian law shall be developed, posted, and communicated to staff and all ex- combatants who participate in DDR. \n 3.Additionally, an appropriate means of reporting and penalizing those who violate international or national law to the appropriate authorities shall be created and made available to staff, participating ex-combatants, and members of recipient communities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -203772,7 +203772,7 @@ "Heading2": "8.2. Designing DDR programmes that \u201cdo no harm\u201d", "Heading3": "8.2.2. Incorporate a commitment to international humanitarian and human right law into the design of DDR programmes", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 3.Additionally, an appropriate means of reporting and penalizing those who violate international or national law to the appropriate authorities shall be created and made available to staff, participating ex-combatants, and members of recipient communities.", + "Sentence": "\n 3.Additionally, an appropriate means of reporting and penalizing those who violate international or national law to the appropriate authorities shall be created and made available to staff, participating ex-combatants, and members of recipient communities.", "newParagraph": "ddr programme supported un committed respect ensure respect implement international humanitarian human right law see module 21 section 515 mean protecting right participate ddr programme well right member community asked receive integrate excombatants ddr programme uphold humanitarian human right law hold accountable violate law likely perceived legitimate process excombatants immediate beneficiary society whole procedure affirm commitment may include following n 1 international national staff shall trained obligation international law n 2 rule regulation aimed protecting human right upholding international humanitarian law shall developed posted communicated staff ex combatant participate ddr n 3additionally appropriate mean reporting penalizing violate international national law appropriate authority shall created made available staff participating excombatants member recipient community", "ProcessedSent": "n 3additionally appropriate mean reporting penalizing violate international national law appropriate authority shall created made available staff participating excombatants member recipient community", "SentID": 11320 @@ -204211,7 +204211,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3170, - "Paragraph": "Box 7 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \\n Consider sharing programme information. \\n Consider developing a common approach to gathering information on children who leave armed forces and groups \\n Consider screening of human rights records of ex-combatants. \\n Collaborate on sequencing DDR and TJ efforts. \\n Coordinate on strategies to target spoilers. \\n Encourage ex-combatants to participate in transitional justice measures. \\n Consider how DDR may connect to and support legitimate locally based justice processes. \\n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of women associated with armed groups and forces. \\n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of children associated with armed groups and forces. \\n Consider how the design of the DDR programme contributes to the aims of institutional reform.", + "Paragraph": "Box 7 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \n Consider sharing programme information. \n Consider developing a common approach to gathering information on children who leave armed forces and groups \n Consider screening of human rights records of ex-combatants. \n Collaborate on sequencing DDR and TJ efforts. \n Coordinate on strategies to target spoilers. \n Encourage ex-combatants to participate in transitional justice measures. \n Consider how DDR may connect to and support legitimate locally based justice processes. \n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of women associated with armed groups and forces. \n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of children associated with armed groups and forces. \n Consider how the design of the DDR programme contributes to the aims of institutional reform.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -204222,14 +204222,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.3. Beyond \u201cdo no harm\u201d: Constructively connecting DDR and TJ .", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Box 7 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \\n Consider sharing programme information.", + "Sentence": "Box 7 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \n Consider sharing programme information.", "newParagraph": "box 7 action point ddr tj practitioner n consider sharing programme information n consider developing common approach gathering information child leave armed force group n consider screening human right record excombatants n collaborate sequencing ddr tj effort n coordinate strategy target spoiler n encourage excombatants participate transitional justice measure n consider ddr may connect support legitimate locally based justice process n consider ddr transitional justice measure may coordinate support reintegration woman associated armed group force n consider ddr transitional justice measure may coordinate support reintegration child associated armed group force n consider design ddr programme contributes aim institutional reform", "ProcessedSent": "box 7 action point ddr tj practitioner n consider sharing programme information", "SentID": 11345 }, { "ParagraphID": 3170, - "Paragraph": "Box 7 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \\n Consider sharing programme information. \\n Consider developing a common approach to gathering information on children who leave armed forces and groups \\n Consider screening of human rights records of ex-combatants. \\n Collaborate on sequencing DDR and TJ efforts. \\n Coordinate on strategies to target spoilers. \\n Encourage ex-combatants to participate in transitional justice measures. \\n Consider how DDR may connect to and support legitimate locally based justice processes. \\n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of women associated with armed groups and forces. \\n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of children associated with armed groups and forces. \\n Consider how the design of the DDR programme contributes to the aims of institutional reform.", + "Paragraph": "Box 7 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \n Consider sharing programme information. \n Consider developing a common approach to gathering information on children who leave armed forces and groups \n Consider screening of human rights records of ex-combatants. \n Collaborate on sequencing DDR and TJ efforts. \n Coordinate on strategies to target spoilers. \n Encourage ex-combatants to participate in transitional justice measures. \n Consider how DDR may connect to and support legitimate locally based justice processes. \n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of women associated with armed groups and forces. \n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of children associated with armed groups and forces. \n Consider how the design of the DDR programme contributes to the aims of institutional reform.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -204240,14 +204240,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.3. Beyond \u201cdo no harm\u201d: Constructively connecting DDR and TJ .", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Consider developing a common approach to gathering information on children who leave armed forces and groups \\n Consider screening of human rights records of ex-combatants.", + "Sentence": "\n Consider developing a common approach to gathering information on children who leave armed forces and groups \n Consider screening of human rights records of ex-combatants.", "newParagraph": "box 7 action point ddr tj practitioner n consider sharing programme information n consider developing common approach gathering information child leave armed force group n consider screening human right record excombatants n collaborate sequencing ddr tj effort n coordinate strategy target spoiler n encourage excombatants participate transitional justice measure n consider ddr may connect support legitimate locally based justice process n consider ddr transitional justice measure may coordinate support reintegration woman associated armed group force n consider ddr transitional justice measure may coordinate support reintegration child associated armed group force n consider design ddr programme contributes aim institutional reform", "ProcessedSent": "n consider developing common approach gathering information child leave armed force group n consider screening human right record excombatants", "SentID": 11346 }, { "ParagraphID": 3170, - "Paragraph": "Box 7 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \\n Consider sharing programme information. \\n Consider developing a common approach to gathering information on children who leave armed forces and groups \\n Consider screening of human rights records of ex-combatants. \\n Collaborate on sequencing DDR and TJ efforts. \\n Coordinate on strategies to target spoilers. \\n Encourage ex-combatants to participate in transitional justice measures. \\n Consider how DDR may connect to and support legitimate locally based justice processes. \\n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of women associated with armed groups and forces. \\n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of children associated with armed groups and forces. \\n Consider how the design of the DDR programme contributes to the aims of institutional reform.", + "Paragraph": "Box 7 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \n Consider sharing programme information. \n Consider developing a common approach to gathering information on children who leave armed forces and groups \n Consider screening of human rights records of ex-combatants. \n Collaborate on sequencing DDR and TJ efforts. \n Coordinate on strategies to target spoilers. \n Encourage ex-combatants to participate in transitional justice measures. \n Consider how DDR may connect to and support legitimate locally based justice processes. \n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of women associated with armed groups and forces. \n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of children associated with armed groups and forces. \n Consider how the design of the DDR programme contributes to the aims of institutional reform.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -204258,14 +204258,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.3. Beyond \u201cdo no harm\u201d: Constructively connecting DDR and TJ .", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Collaborate on sequencing DDR and TJ efforts.", + "Sentence": "\n Collaborate on sequencing DDR and TJ efforts.", "newParagraph": "box 7 action point ddr tj practitioner n consider sharing programme information n consider developing common approach gathering information child leave armed force group n consider screening human right record excombatants n collaborate sequencing ddr tj effort n coordinate strategy target spoiler n encourage excombatants participate transitional justice measure n consider ddr may connect support legitimate locally based justice process n consider ddr transitional justice measure may coordinate support reintegration woman associated armed group force n consider ddr transitional justice measure may coordinate support reintegration child associated armed group force n consider design ddr programme contributes aim institutional reform", "ProcessedSent": "n collaborate sequencing ddr tj effort", "SentID": 11347 }, { "ParagraphID": 3170, - "Paragraph": "Box 7 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \\n Consider sharing programme information. \\n Consider developing a common approach to gathering information on children who leave armed forces and groups \\n Consider screening of human rights records of ex-combatants. \\n Collaborate on sequencing DDR and TJ efforts. \\n Coordinate on strategies to target spoilers. \\n Encourage ex-combatants to participate in transitional justice measures. \\n Consider how DDR may connect to and support legitimate locally based justice processes. \\n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of women associated with armed groups and forces. \\n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of children associated with armed groups and forces. \\n Consider how the design of the DDR programme contributes to the aims of institutional reform.", + "Paragraph": "Box 7 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \n Consider sharing programme information. \n Consider developing a common approach to gathering information on children who leave armed forces and groups \n Consider screening of human rights records of ex-combatants. \n Collaborate on sequencing DDR and TJ efforts. \n Coordinate on strategies to target spoilers. \n Encourage ex-combatants to participate in transitional justice measures. \n Consider how DDR may connect to and support legitimate locally based justice processes. \n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of women associated with armed groups and forces. \n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of children associated with armed groups and forces. \n Consider how the design of the DDR programme contributes to the aims of institutional reform.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -204276,14 +204276,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.3. Beyond \u201cdo no harm\u201d: Constructively connecting DDR and TJ .", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Coordinate on strategies to target spoilers.", + "Sentence": "\n Coordinate on strategies to target spoilers.", "newParagraph": "box 7 action point ddr tj practitioner n consider sharing programme information n consider developing common approach gathering information child leave armed force group n consider screening human right record excombatants n collaborate sequencing ddr tj effort n coordinate strategy target spoiler n encourage excombatants participate transitional justice measure n consider ddr may connect support legitimate locally based justice process n consider ddr transitional justice measure may coordinate support reintegration woman associated armed group force n consider ddr transitional justice measure may coordinate support reintegration child associated armed group force n consider design ddr programme contributes aim institutional reform", "ProcessedSent": "n coordinate strategy target spoiler", "SentID": 11348 }, { "ParagraphID": 3170, - "Paragraph": "Box 7 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \\n Consider sharing programme information. \\n Consider developing a common approach to gathering information on children who leave armed forces and groups \\n Consider screening of human rights records of ex-combatants. \\n Collaborate on sequencing DDR and TJ efforts. \\n Coordinate on strategies to target spoilers. \\n Encourage ex-combatants to participate in transitional justice measures. \\n Consider how DDR may connect to and support legitimate locally based justice processes. \\n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of women associated with armed groups and forces. \\n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of children associated with armed groups and forces. \\n Consider how the design of the DDR programme contributes to the aims of institutional reform.", + "Paragraph": "Box 7 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \n Consider sharing programme information. \n Consider developing a common approach to gathering information on children who leave armed forces and groups \n Consider screening of human rights records of ex-combatants. \n Collaborate on sequencing DDR and TJ efforts. \n Coordinate on strategies to target spoilers. \n Encourage ex-combatants to participate in transitional justice measures. \n Consider how DDR may connect to and support legitimate locally based justice processes. \n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of women associated with armed groups and forces. \n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of children associated with armed groups and forces. \n Consider how the design of the DDR programme contributes to the aims of institutional reform.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -204294,14 +204294,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.3. Beyond \u201cdo no harm\u201d: Constructively connecting DDR and TJ .", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Encourage ex-combatants to participate in transitional justice measures.", + "Sentence": "\n Encourage ex-combatants to participate in transitional justice measures.", "newParagraph": "box 7 action point ddr tj practitioner n consider sharing programme information n consider developing common approach gathering information child leave armed force group n consider screening human right record excombatants n collaborate sequencing ddr tj effort n coordinate strategy target spoiler n encourage excombatants participate transitional justice measure n consider ddr may connect support legitimate locally based justice process n consider ddr transitional justice measure may coordinate support reintegration woman associated armed group force n consider ddr transitional justice measure may coordinate support reintegration child associated armed group force n consider design ddr programme contributes aim institutional reform", "ProcessedSent": "n encourage excombatants participate transitional justice measure", "SentID": 11349 }, { "ParagraphID": 3170, - "Paragraph": "Box 7 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \\n Consider sharing programme information. \\n Consider developing a common approach to gathering information on children who leave armed forces and groups \\n Consider screening of human rights records of ex-combatants. \\n Collaborate on sequencing DDR and TJ efforts. \\n Coordinate on strategies to target spoilers. \\n Encourage ex-combatants to participate in transitional justice measures. \\n Consider how DDR may connect to and support legitimate locally based justice processes. \\n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of women associated with armed groups and forces. \\n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of children associated with armed groups and forces. \\n Consider how the design of the DDR programme contributes to the aims of institutional reform.", + "Paragraph": "Box 7 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \n Consider sharing programme information. \n Consider developing a common approach to gathering information on children who leave armed forces and groups \n Consider screening of human rights records of ex-combatants. \n Collaborate on sequencing DDR and TJ efforts. \n Coordinate on strategies to target spoilers. \n Encourage ex-combatants to participate in transitional justice measures. \n Consider how DDR may connect to and support legitimate locally based justice processes. \n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of women associated with armed groups and forces. \n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of children associated with armed groups and forces. \n Consider how the design of the DDR programme contributes to the aims of institutional reform.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -204312,14 +204312,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.3. Beyond \u201cdo no harm\u201d: Constructively connecting DDR and TJ .", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Consider how DDR may connect to and support legitimate locally based justice processes.", + "Sentence": "\n Consider how DDR may connect to and support legitimate locally based justice processes.", "newParagraph": "box 7 action point ddr tj practitioner n consider sharing programme information n consider developing common approach gathering information child leave armed force group n consider screening human right record excombatants n collaborate sequencing ddr tj effort n coordinate strategy target spoiler n encourage excombatants participate transitional justice measure n consider ddr may connect support legitimate locally based justice process n consider ddr transitional justice measure may coordinate support reintegration woman associated armed group force n consider ddr transitional justice measure may coordinate support reintegration child associated armed group force n consider design ddr programme contributes aim institutional reform", "ProcessedSent": "n consider ddr may connect support legitimate locally based justice process", "SentID": 11350 }, { "ParagraphID": 3170, - "Paragraph": "Box 7 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \\n Consider sharing programme information. \\n Consider developing a common approach to gathering information on children who leave armed forces and groups \\n Consider screening of human rights records of ex-combatants. \\n Collaborate on sequencing DDR and TJ efforts. \\n Coordinate on strategies to target spoilers. \\n Encourage ex-combatants to participate in transitional justice measures. \\n Consider how DDR may connect to and support legitimate locally based justice processes. \\n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of women associated with armed groups and forces. \\n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of children associated with armed groups and forces. \\n Consider how the design of the DDR programme contributes to the aims of institutional reform.", + "Paragraph": "Box 7 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \n Consider sharing programme information. \n Consider developing a common approach to gathering information on children who leave armed forces and groups \n Consider screening of human rights records of ex-combatants. \n Collaborate on sequencing DDR and TJ efforts. \n Coordinate on strategies to target spoilers. \n Encourage ex-combatants to participate in transitional justice measures. \n Consider how DDR may connect to and support legitimate locally based justice processes. \n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of women associated with armed groups and forces. \n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of children associated with armed groups and forces. \n Consider how the design of the DDR programme contributes to the aims of institutional reform.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -204330,14 +204330,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.3. Beyond \u201cdo no harm\u201d: Constructively connecting DDR and TJ .", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of women associated with armed groups and forces.", + "Sentence": "\n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of women associated with armed groups and forces.", "newParagraph": "box 7 action point ddr tj practitioner n consider sharing programme information n consider developing common approach gathering information child leave armed force group n consider screening human right record excombatants n collaborate sequencing ddr tj effort n coordinate strategy target spoiler n encourage excombatants participate transitional justice measure n consider ddr may connect support legitimate locally based justice process n consider ddr transitional justice measure may coordinate support reintegration woman associated armed group force n consider ddr transitional justice measure may coordinate support reintegration child associated armed group force n consider design ddr programme contributes aim institutional reform", "ProcessedSent": "n consider ddr transitional justice measure may coordinate support reintegration woman associated armed group force", "SentID": 11351 }, { "ParagraphID": 3170, - "Paragraph": "Box 7 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \\n Consider sharing programme information. \\n Consider developing a common approach to gathering information on children who leave armed forces and groups \\n Consider screening of human rights records of ex-combatants. \\n Collaborate on sequencing DDR and TJ efforts. \\n Coordinate on strategies to target spoilers. \\n Encourage ex-combatants to participate in transitional justice measures. \\n Consider how DDR may connect to and support legitimate locally based justice processes. \\n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of women associated with armed groups and forces. \\n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of children associated with armed groups and forces. \\n Consider how the design of the DDR programme contributes to the aims of institutional reform.", + "Paragraph": "Box 7 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \n Consider sharing programme information. \n Consider developing a common approach to gathering information on children who leave armed forces and groups \n Consider screening of human rights records of ex-combatants. \n Collaborate on sequencing DDR and TJ efforts. \n Coordinate on strategies to target spoilers. \n Encourage ex-combatants to participate in transitional justice measures. \n Consider how DDR may connect to and support legitimate locally based justice processes. \n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of women associated with armed groups and forces. \n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of children associated with armed groups and forces. \n Consider how the design of the DDR programme contributes to the aims of institutional reform.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -204348,14 +204348,14 @@ "Heading2": "8.3. Beyond \u201cdo no harm\u201d: Constructively connecting DDR and TJ .", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of children associated with armed groups and forces.", + "Sentence": "\n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of children associated with armed groups and forces.", "newParagraph": "box 7 action point ddr tj practitioner n consider sharing programme information n consider developing common approach gathering information child leave armed force group n consider screening human right record excombatants n collaborate sequencing ddr tj effort n coordinate strategy target spoiler n encourage excombatants participate transitional justice measure n consider ddr may connect support legitimate locally based justice process n consider ddr transitional justice measure may coordinate support reintegration woman associated armed group force n consider ddr transitional justice measure may coordinate support reintegration child associated armed group force n consider design ddr programme contributes aim institutional reform", "ProcessedSent": "n consider ddr transitional justice measure may coordinate support reintegration child associated armed group force", "SentID": 11352 }, { "ParagraphID": 3170, - "Paragraph": "Box 7 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \\n Consider sharing programme information. \\n Consider developing a common approach to gathering information on children who leave armed forces and groups \\n Consider screening of human rights records of ex-combatants. \\n Collaborate on sequencing DDR and TJ efforts. \\n Coordinate on strategies to target spoilers. \\n Encourage ex-combatants to participate in transitional justice measures. \\n Consider how DDR may connect to and support legitimate locally based justice processes. \\n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of women associated with armed groups and forces. \\n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of children associated with armed groups and forces. \\n Consider how the design of the DDR programme contributes to the aims of institutional reform.", + "Paragraph": "Box 7 Action points for DDR and TJ practitioners \n Consider sharing programme information. \n Consider developing a common approach to gathering information on children who leave armed forces and groups \n Consider screening of human rights records of ex-combatants. \n Collaborate on sequencing DDR and TJ efforts. \n Coordinate on strategies to target spoilers. \n Encourage ex-combatants to participate in transitional justice measures. \n Consider how DDR may connect to and support legitimate locally based justice processes. \n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of women associated with armed groups and forces. \n Consider how DDR and transitional justice measures may coordinate to support the reintegration of children associated with armed groups and forces. \n Consider how the design of the DDR programme contributes to the aims of institutional reform.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -204366,7 +204366,7 @@ "Heading2": "8.3. Beyond \u201cdo no harm\u201d: Constructively connecting DDR and TJ .", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Consider how the design of the DDR programme contributes to the aims of institutional reform.", + "Sentence": "\n Consider how the design of the DDR programme contributes to the aims of institutional reform.", "newParagraph": "box 7 action point ddr tj practitioner n consider sharing programme information n consider developing common approach gathering information child leave armed force group n consider screening human right record excombatants n collaborate sequencing ddr tj effort n coordinate strategy target spoiler n encourage excombatants participate transitional justice measure n consider ddr may connect support legitimate locally based justice process n consider ddr transitional justice measure may coordinate support reintegration woman associated armed group force n consider ddr transitional justice measure may coordinate support reintegration child associated armed group force n consider design ddr programme contributes aim institutional reform", "ProcessedSent": "n consider design ddr programme contributes aim institutional reform", "SentID": 11353 @@ -206479,7 +206479,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3202, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to the overall human rights situation \\n What crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law were perpetrated by the different protagonists in the armed conflict? In what different ways were women involved in the conflict? Describe any specific forms of abuse to \\n \\n which women and girls were subjected during the conflict. \\n Describe any use of children by combatant groups. Was this abuse part of an orches- trated strategy, i.e. systematic and perpetrated by state and non-state security forces? If so, what were the institutional processes that facilitated such abuse?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to the overall human rights situation \n What crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law were perpetrated by the different protagonists in the armed conflict? In what different ways were women involved in the conflict? Describe any specific forms of abuse to \n \n which women and girls were subjected during the conflict. \n Describe any use of children by combatant groups. Was this abuse part of an orches- trated strategy, i.e. systematic and perpetrated by state and non-state security forces? If so, what were the institutional processes that facilitated such abuse?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -206490,14 +206490,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Questions related to the overall human rights situation \\n What crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law were perpetrated by the different protagonists in the armed conflict?", + "Sentence": "Questions related to the overall human rights situation \n What crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law were perpetrated by the different protagonists in the armed conflict?", "newParagraph": "question related overall human right situation n crime involving violation international human right law international humanitarian law perpetrated different protagonist armed conflict different way woman involved conflict describe specific form abuse n n woman girl subjected conflict n describe use child combatant group abuse part orches trated strategy ie systematic perpetrated state nonstate security force institutional process facilitated abuse", "ProcessedSent": "question related overall human right situation n crime involving violation international human right law international humanitarian law perpetrated different protagonist armed conflict", "SentID": 11471 }, { "ParagraphID": 3202, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to the overall human rights situation \\n What crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law were perpetrated by the different protagonists in the armed conflict? In what different ways were women involved in the conflict? Describe any specific forms of abuse to \\n \\n which women and girls were subjected during the conflict. \\n Describe any use of children by combatant groups. Was this abuse part of an orches- trated strategy, i.e. systematic and perpetrated by state and non-state security forces? If so, what were the institutional processes that facilitated such abuse?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to the overall human rights situation \n What crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law were perpetrated by the different protagonists in the armed conflict? In what different ways were women involved in the conflict? Describe any specific forms of abuse to \n \n which women and girls were subjected during the conflict. \n Describe any use of children by combatant groups. Was this abuse part of an orches- trated strategy, i.e. systematic and perpetrated by state and non-state security forces? If so, what were the institutional processes that facilitated such abuse?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -206515,7 +206515,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3202, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to the overall human rights situation \\n What crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law were perpetrated by the different protagonists in the armed conflict? In what different ways were women involved in the conflict? Describe any specific forms of abuse to \\n \\n which women and girls were subjected during the conflict. \\n Describe any use of children by combatant groups. Was this abuse part of an orches- trated strategy, i.e. systematic and perpetrated by state and non-state security forces? If so, what were the institutional processes that facilitated such abuse?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to the overall human rights situation \n What crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law were perpetrated by the different protagonists in the armed conflict? In what different ways were women involved in the conflict? Describe any specific forms of abuse to \n \n which women and girls were subjected during the conflict. \n Describe any use of children by combatant groups. Was this abuse part of an orches- trated strategy, i.e. systematic and perpetrated by state and non-state security forces? If so, what were the institutional processes that facilitated such abuse?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -206526,14 +206526,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Describe any specific forms of abuse to \\n \\n which women and girls were subjected during the conflict.", + "Sentence": "Describe any specific forms of abuse to \n \n which women and girls were subjected during the conflict.", "newParagraph": "question related overall human right situation n crime involving violation international human right law international humanitarian law perpetrated different protagonist armed conflict different way woman involved conflict describe specific form abuse n n woman girl subjected conflict n describe use child combatant group abuse part orches trated strategy ie systematic perpetrated state nonstate security force institutional process facilitated abuse", "ProcessedSent": "describe specific form abuse n n woman girl subjected conflict", "SentID": 11473 }, { "ParagraphID": 3202, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to the overall human rights situation \\n What crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law were perpetrated by the different protagonists in the armed conflict? In what different ways were women involved in the conflict? Describe any specific forms of abuse to \\n \\n which women and girls were subjected during the conflict. \\n Describe any use of children by combatant groups. Was this abuse part of an orches- trated strategy, i.e. systematic and perpetrated by state and non-state security forces? If so, what were the institutional processes that facilitated such abuse?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to the overall human rights situation \n What crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law were perpetrated by the different protagonists in the armed conflict? In what different ways were women involved in the conflict? Describe any specific forms of abuse to \n \n which women and girls were subjected during the conflict. \n Describe any use of children by combatant groups. Was this abuse part of an orches- trated strategy, i.e. systematic and perpetrated by state and non-state security forces? If so, what were the institutional processes that facilitated such abuse?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -206544,14 +206544,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Describe any use of children by combatant groups.", + "Sentence": "\n Describe any use of children by combatant groups.", "newParagraph": "question related overall human right situation n crime involving violation international human right law international humanitarian law perpetrated different protagonist armed conflict different way woman involved conflict describe specific form abuse n n woman girl subjected conflict n describe use child combatant group abuse part orches trated strategy ie systematic perpetrated state nonstate security force institutional process facilitated abuse", "ProcessedSent": "n describe use child combatant group", "SentID": 11474 }, { "ParagraphID": 3202, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to the overall human rights situation \\n What crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law were perpetrated by the different protagonists in the armed conflict? In what different ways were women involved in the conflict? Describe any specific forms of abuse to \\n \\n which women and girls were subjected during the conflict. \\n Describe any use of children by combatant groups. Was this abuse part of an orches- trated strategy, i.e. systematic and perpetrated by state and non-state security forces? If so, what were the institutional processes that facilitated such abuse?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to the overall human rights situation \n What crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law were perpetrated by the different protagonists in the armed conflict? In what different ways were women involved in the conflict? Describe any specific forms of abuse to \n \n which women and girls were subjected during the conflict. \n Describe any use of children by combatant groups. Was this abuse part of an orches- trated strategy, i.e. systematic and perpetrated by state and non-state security forces? If so, what were the institutional processes that facilitated such abuse?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -206569,7 +206569,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3202, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to the overall human rights situation \\n What crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law were perpetrated by the different protagonists in the armed conflict? In what different ways were women involved in the conflict? Describe any specific forms of abuse to \\n \\n which women and girls were subjected during the conflict. \\n Describe any use of children by combatant groups. Was this abuse part of an orches- trated strategy, i.e. systematic and perpetrated by state and non-state security forces? If so, what were the institutional processes that facilitated such abuse?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to the overall human rights situation \n What crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law were perpetrated by the different protagonists in the armed conflict? In what different ways were women involved in the conflict? Describe any specific forms of abuse to \n \n which women and girls were subjected during the conflict. \n Describe any use of children by combatant groups. Was this abuse part of an orches- trated strategy, i.e. systematic and perpetrated by state and non-state security forces? If so, what were the institutional processes that facilitated such abuse?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -206587,7 +206587,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3202, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to the overall human rights situation \\n What crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law were perpetrated by the different protagonists in the armed conflict? In what different ways were women involved in the conflict? Describe any specific forms of abuse to \\n \\n which women and girls were subjected during the conflict. \\n Describe any use of children by combatant groups. Was this abuse part of an orches- trated strategy, i.e. systematic and perpetrated by state and non-state security forces? If so, what were the institutional processes that facilitated such abuse?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to the overall human rights situation \n What crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law were perpetrated by the different protagonists in the armed conflict? In what different ways were women involved in the conflict? Describe any specific forms of abuse to \n \n which women and girls were subjected during the conflict. \n Describe any use of children by combatant groups. Was this abuse part of an orches- trated strategy, i.e. systematic and perpetrated by state and non-state security forces? If so, what were the institutional processes that facilitated such abuse?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -206605,7 +206605,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3203, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to the peace agreement \\n What were the key components of the final peace agreement? \\n Was amnesty offered as part of the peace process? What type of amnesty? And for what abuses (forced recruitment of children, sexual violence etc)? \\n Were there any transitional justice measures mandated in the peace agreement such as a truth commission, prosecutions process, reparations programme for victims, or insti- tutional reform aimed at preventing future human rights violations? \\n Did the peace agreement stipulate any connection between the DDR process and transitional justice measures? \\n How was information about the peace agreement disseminated to the general popu- lation, in particular to vulnerable and marginalized groups?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to the peace agreement \n What were the key components of the final peace agreement? \n Was amnesty offered as part of the peace process? What type of amnesty? And for what abuses (forced recruitment of children, sexual violence etc)? \n Were there any transitional justice measures mandated in the peace agreement such as a truth commission, prosecutions process, reparations programme for victims, or insti- tutional reform aimed at preventing future human rights violations? \n Did the peace agreement stipulate any connection between the DDR process and transitional justice measures? \n How was information about the peace agreement disseminated to the general popu- lation, in particular to vulnerable and marginalized groups?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -206616,14 +206616,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Questions related to the peace agreement \\n What were the key components of the final peace agreement?", + "Sentence": "Questions related to the peace agreement \n What were the key components of the final peace agreement?", "newParagraph": "question related peace agreement n key component final peace agreement n amnesty offered part peace process type amnesty abuse forced recruitment child sexual violence etc n transitional justice measure mandated peace agreement truth commission prosecution process reparation programme victim insti tutional reform aimed preventing future human right violation n peace agreement stipulate connection ddr process transitional justice measure n information peace agreement disseminated general popu lation particular vulnerable marginalized group", "ProcessedSent": "question related peace agreement n key component final peace agreement", "SentID": 11478 }, { "ParagraphID": 3203, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to the peace agreement \\n What were the key components of the final peace agreement? \\n Was amnesty offered as part of the peace process? What type of amnesty? And for what abuses (forced recruitment of children, sexual violence etc)? \\n Were there any transitional justice measures mandated in the peace agreement such as a truth commission, prosecutions process, reparations programme for victims, or insti- tutional reform aimed at preventing future human rights violations? \\n Did the peace agreement stipulate any connection between the DDR process and transitional justice measures? \\n How was information about the peace agreement disseminated to the general popu- lation, in particular to vulnerable and marginalized groups?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to the peace agreement \n What were the key components of the final peace agreement? \n Was amnesty offered as part of the peace process? What type of amnesty? And for what abuses (forced recruitment of children, sexual violence etc)? \n Were there any transitional justice measures mandated in the peace agreement such as a truth commission, prosecutions process, reparations programme for victims, or insti- tutional reform aimed at preventing future human rights violations? \n Did the peace agreement stipulate any connection between the DDR process and transitional justice measures? \n How was information about the peace agreement disseminated to the general popu- lation, in particular to vulnerable and marginalized groups?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -206634,14 +206634,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Was amnesty offered as part of the peace process?", + "Sentence": "\n Was amnesty offered as part of the peace process?", "newParagraph": "question related peace agreement n key component final peace agreement n amnesty offered part peace process type amnesty abuse forced recruitment child sexual violence etc n transitional justice measure mandated peace agreement truth commission prosecution process reparation programme victim insti tutional reform aimed preventing future human right violation n peace agreement stipulate connection ddr process transitional justice measure n information peace agreement disseminated general popu lation particular vulnerable marginalized group", "ProcessedSent": "n amnesty offered part peace process", "SentID": 11479 }, { "ParagraphID": 3203, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to the peace agreement \\n What were the key components of the final peace agreement? \\n Was amnesty offered as part of the peace process? What type of amnesty? And for what abuses (forced recruitment of children, sexual violence etc)? \\n Were there any transitional justice measures mandated in the peace agreement such as a truth commission, prosecutions process, reparations programme for victims, or insti- tutional reform aimed at preventing future human rights violations? \\n Did the peace agreement stipulate any connection between the DDR process and transitional justice measures? \\n How was information about the peace agreement disseminated to the general popu- lation, in particular to vulnerable and marginalized groups?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to the peace agreement \n What were the key components of the final peace agreement? \n Was amnesty offered as part of the peace process? What type of amnesty? And for what abuses (forced recruitment of children, sexual violence etc)? \n Were there any transitional justice measures mandated in the peace agreement such as a truth commission, prosecutions process, reparations programme for victims, or insti- tutional reform aimed at preventing future human rights violations? \n Did the peace agreement stipulate any connection between the DDR process and transitional justice measures? \n How was information about the peace agreement disseminated to the general popu- lation, in particular to vulnerable and marginalized groups?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -206659,7 +206659,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3203, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to the peace agreement \\n What were the key components of the final peace agreement? \\n Was amnesty offered as part of the peace process? What type of amnesty? And for what abuses (forced recruitment of children, sexual violence etc)? \\n Were there any transitional justice measures mandated in the peace agreement such as a truth commission, prosecutions process, reparations programme for victims, or insti- tutional reform aimed at preventing future human rights violations? \\n Did the peace agreement stipulate any connection between the DDR process and transitional justice measures? \\n How was information about the peace agreement disseminated to the general popu- lation, in particular to vulnerable and marginalized groups?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to the peace agreement \n What were the key components of the final peace agreement? \n Was amnesty offered as part of the peace process? What type of amnesty? And for what abuses (forced recruitment of children, sexual violence etc)? \n Were there any transitional justice measures mandated in the peace agreement such as a truth commission, prosecutions process, reparations programme for victims, or insti- tutional reform aimed at preventing future human rights violations? \n Did the peace agreement stipulate any connection between the DDR process and transitional justice measures? \n How was information about the peace agreement disseminated to the general popu- lation, in particular to vulnerable and marginalized groups?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -206677,7 +206677,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3203, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to the peace agreement \\n What were the key components of the final peace agreement? \\n Was amnesty offered as part of the peace process? What type of amnesty? And for what abuses (forced recruitment of children, sexual violence etc)? \\n Were there any transitional justice measures mandated in the peace agreement such as a truth commission, prosecutions process, reparations programme for victims, or insti- tutional reform aimed at preventing future human rights violations? \\n Did the peace agreement stipulate any connection between the DDR process and transitional justice measures? \\n How was information about the peace agreement disseminated to the general popu- lation, in particular to vulnerable and marginalized groups?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to the peace agreement \n What were the key components of the final peace agreement? \n Was amnesty offered as part of the peace process? What type of amnesty? And for what abuses (forced recruitment of children, sexual violence etc)? \n Were there any transitional justice measures mandated in the peace agreement such as a truth commission, prosecutions process, reparations programme for victims, or insti- tutional reform aimed at preventing future human rights violations? \n Did the peace agreement stipulate any connection between the DDR process and transitional justice measures? \n How was information about the peace agreement disseminated to the general popu- lation, in particular to vulnerable and marginalized groups?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -206688,14 +206688,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Were there any transitional justice measures mandated in the peace agreement such as a truth commission, prosecutions process, reparations programme for victims, or insti- tutional reform aimed at preventing future human rights violations?", + "Sentence": "\n Were there any transitional justice measures mandated in the peace agreement such as a truth commission, prosecutions process, reparations programme for victims, or insti- tutional reform aimed at preventing future human rights violations?", "newParagraph": "question related peace agreement n key component final peace agreement n amnesty offered part peace process type amnesty abuse forced recruitment child sexual violence etc n transitional justice measure mandated peace agreement truth commission prosecution process reparation programme victim insti tutional reform aimed preventing future human right violation n peace agreement stipulate connection ddr process transitional justice measure n information peace agreement disseminated general popu lation particular vulnerable marginalized group", "ProcessedSent": "n transitional justice measure mandated peace agreement truth commission prosecution process reparation programme victim insti tutional reform aimed preventing future human right violation", "SentID": 11482 }, { "ParagraphID": 3203, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to the peace agreement \\n What were the key components of the final peace agreement? \\n Was amnesty offered as part of the peace process? What type of amnesty? And for what abuses (forced recruitment of children, sexual violence etc)? \\n Were there any transitional justice measures mandated in the peace agreement such as a truth commission, prosecutions process, reparations programme for victims, or insti- tutional reform aimed at preventing future human rights violations? \\n Did the peace agreement stipulate any connection between the DDR process and transitional justice measures? \\n How was information about the peace agreement disseminated to the general popu- lation, in particular to vulnerable and marginalized groups?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to the peace agreement \n What were the key components of the final peace agreement? \n Was amnesty offered as part of the peace process? What type of amnesty? And for what abuses (forced recruitment of children, sexual violence etc)? \n Were there any transitional justice measures mandated in the peace agreement such as a truth commission, prosecutions process, reparations programme for victims, or insti- tutional reform aimed at preventing future human rights violations? \n Did the peace agreement stipulate any connection between the DDR process and transitional justice measures? \n How was information about the peace agreement disseminated to the general popu- lation, in particular to vulnerable and marginalized groups?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -206706,14 +206706,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Did the peace agreement stipulate any connection between the DDR process and transitional justice measures?", + "Sentence": "\n Did the peace agreement stipulate any connection between the DDR process and transitional justice measures?", "newParagraph": "question related peace agreement n key component final peace agreement n amnesty offered part peace process type amnesty abuse forced recruitment child sexual violence etc n transitional justice measure mandated peace agreement truth commission prosecution process reparation programme victim insti tutional reform aimed preventing future human right violation n peace agreement stipulate connection ddr process transitional justice measure n information peace agreement disseminated general popu lation particular vulnerable marginalized group", "ProcessedSent": "n peace agreement stipulate connection ddr process transitional justice measure", "SentID": 11483 }, { "ParagraphID": 3203, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to the peace agreement \\n What were the key components of the final peace agreement? \\n Was amnesty offered as part of the peace process? What type of amnesty? And for what abuses (forced recruitment of children, sexual violence etc)? \\n Were there any transitional justice measures mandated in the peace agreement such as a truth commission, prosecutions process, reparations programme for victims, or insti- tutional reform aimed at preventing future human rights violations? \\n Did the peace agreement stipulate any connection between the DDR process and transitional justice measures? \\n How was information about the peace agreement disseminated to the general popu- lation, in particular to vulnerable and marginalized groups?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to the peace agreement \n What were the key components of the final peace agreement? \n Was amnesty offered as part of the peace process? What type of amnesty? And for what abuses (forced recruitment of children, sexual violence etc)? \n Were there any transitional justice measures mandated in the peace agreement such as a truth commission, prosecutions process, reparations programme for victims, or insti- tutional reform aimed at preventing future human rights violations? \n Did the peace agreement stipulate any connection between the DDR process and transitional justice measures? \n How was information about the peace agreement disseminated to the general popu- lation, in particular to vulnerable and marginalized groups?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -206724,14 +206724,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n How was information about the peace agreement disseminated to the general popu- lation, in particular to vulnerable and marginalized groups?", + "Sentence": "\n How was information about the peace agreement disseminated to the general popu- lation, in particular to vulnerable and marginalized groups?", "newParagraph": "question related peace agreement n key component final peace agreement n amnesty offered part peace process type amnesty abuse forced recruitment child sexual violence etc n transitional justice measure mandated peace agreement truth commission prosecution process reparation programme victim insti tutional reform aimed preventing future human right violation n peace agreement stipulate connection ddr process transitional justice measure n information peace agreement disseminated general popu lation particular vulnerable marginalized group", "ProcessedSent": "n information peace agreement disseminated general popu lation particular vulnerable marginalized group", "SentID": 11484 }, { "ParagraphID": 3204, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to DDR \\n Is there any form of conditionality that links DDR and justice measures, for example, amnesty or the promise of reduced sentences for combatants that enter the DDR program? \\n What are the criteria for admittance into the DDR program? Do the criteria take into consideration the varied roles of women and children associated with armed forces and groups? \\n Will there be any stipulated differences between treatment of men, women or children in the DDR programme? \\n What kind of information will be gathered from combatants during the DDR process? Will the information collected be disaggregated by gender? Will it assess whether ex- combatants committed acts of sexual violence? \\n Will demobilized combatants have the opportunity to be reintegrated into a new army or police force? \\n Is the local community involved in the reintegration programme? \\n Will the reintegration programme consider or aim to provide benefits to the commu- nities where demobilized combatants will return?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to DDR \n Is there any form of conditionality that links DDR and justice measures, for example, amnesty or the promise of reduced sentences for combatants that enter the DDR program? \n What are the criteria for admittance into the DDR program? Do the criteria take into consideration the varied roles of women and children associated with armed forces and groups? \n Will there be any stipulated differences between treatment of men, women or children in the DDR programme? \n What kind of information will be gathered from combatants during the DDR process? Will the information collected be disaggregated by gender? Will it assess whether ex- combatants committed acts of sexual violence? \n Will demobilized combatants have the opportunity to be reintegrated into a new army or police force? \n Is the local community involved in the reintegration programme? \n Will the reintegration programme consider or aim to provide benefits to the commu- nities where demobilized combatants will return?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -206742,14 +206742,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Questions related to DDR \\n Is there any form of conditionality that links DDR and justice measures, for example, amnesty or the promise of reduced sentences for combatants that enter the DDR program?", + "Sentence": "Questions related to DDR \n Is there any form of conditionality that links DDR and justice measures, for example, amnesty or the promise of reduced sentences for combatants that enter the DDR program?", "newParagraph": "question related ddr n form conditionality link ddr justice measure example amnesty promise reduced sentence combatant enter ddr program n criterion admittance ddr program criterion take consideration varied role woman child associated armed force group n stipulated difference treatment men woman child ddr programme n kind information gathered combatant ddr process information collected disaggregated gender ass whether ex combatant committed act sexual violence n demobilized combatant opportunity reintegrated new army police force n local community involved reintegration programme n reintegration programme consider aim provide benefit commu nities demobilized combatant return", "ProcessedSent": "question related ddr n form conditionality link ddr justice measure example amnesty promise reduced sentence combatant enter ddr program", "SentID": 11485 }, { "ParagraphID": 3204, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to DDR \\n Is there any form of conditionality that links DDR and justice measures, for example, amnesty or the promise of reduced sentences for combatants that enter the DDR program? \\n What are the criteria for admittance into the DDR program? Do the criteria take into consideration the varied roles of women and children associated with armed forces and groups? \\n Will there be any stipulated differences between treatment of men, women or children in the DDR programme? \\n What kind of information will be gathered from combatants during the DDR process? Will the information collected be disaggregated by gender? Will it assess whether ex- combatants committed acts of sexual violence? \\n Will demobilized combatants have the opportunity to be reintegrated into a new army or police force? \\n Is the local community involved in the reintegration programme? \\n Will the reintegration programme consider or aim to provide benefits to the commu- nities where demobilized combatants will return?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to DDR \n Is there any form of conditionality that links DDR and justice measures, for example, amnesty or the promise of reduced sentences for combatants that enter the DDR program? \n What are the criteria for admittance into the DDR program? Do the criteria take into consideration the varied roles of women and children associated with armed forces and groups? \n Will there be any stipulated differences between treatment of men, women or children in the DDR programme? \n What kind of information will be gathered from combatants during the DDR process? Will the information collected be disaggregated by gender? Will it assess whether ex- combatants committed acts of sexual violence? \n Will demobilized combatants have the opportunity to be reintegrated into a new army or police force? \n Is the local community involved in the reintegration programme? \n Will the reintegration programme consider or aim to provide benefits to the commu- nities where demobilized combatants will return?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -206760,14 +206760,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are the criteria for admittance into the DDR program?", + "Sentence": "\n What are the criteria for admittance into the DDR program?", "newParagraph": "question related ddr n form conditionality link ddr justice measure example amnesty promise reduced sentence combatant enter ddr program n criterion admittance ddr program criterion take consideration varied role woman child associated armed force group n stipulated difference treatment men woman child ddr programme n kind information gathered combatant ddr process information collected disaggregated gender ass whether ex combatant committed act sexual violence n demobilized combatant opportunity reintegrated new army police force n local community involved reintegration programme n reintegration programme consider aim provide benefit commu nities demobilized combatant return", "ProcessedSent": "n criterion admittance ddr program", "SentID": 11486 }, { "ParagraphID": 3204, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to DDR \\n Is there any form of conditionality that links DDR and justice measures, for example, amnesty or the promise of reduced sentences for combatants that enter the DDR program? \\n What are the criteria for admittance into the DDR program? Do the criteria take into consideration the varied roles of women and children associated with armed forces and groups? \\n Will there be any stipulated differences between treatment of men, women or children in the DDR programme? \\n What kind of information will be gathered from combatants during the DDR process? Will the information collected be disaggregated by gender? Will it assess whether ex- combatants committed acts of sexual violence? \\n Will demobilized combatants have the opportunity to be reintegrated into a new army or police force? \\n Is the local community involved in the reintegration programme? \\n Will the reintegration programme consider or aim to provide benefits to the commu- nities where demobilized combatants will return?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to DDR \n Is there any form of conditionality that links DDR and justice measures, for example, amnesty or the promise of reduced sentences for combatants that enter the DDR program? \n What are the criteria for admittance into the DDR program? Do the criteria take into consideration the varied roles of women and children associated with armed forces and groups? \n Will there be any stipulated differences between treatment of men, women or children in the DDR programme? \n What kind of information will be gathered from combatants during the DDR process? Will the information collected be disaggregated by gender? Will it assess whether ex- combatants committed acts of sexual violence? \n Will demobilized combatants have the opportunity to be reintegrated into a new army or police force? \n Is the local community involved in the reintegration programme? \n Will the reintegration programme consider or aim to provide benefits to the commu- nities where demobilized combatants will return?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -206785,7 +206785,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3204, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to DDR \\n Is there any form of conditionality that links DDR and justice measures, for example, amnesty or the promise of reduced sentences for combatants that enter the DDR program? \\n What are the criteria for admittance into the DDR program? Do the criteria take into consideration the varied roles of women and children associated with armed forces and groups? \\n Will there be any stipulated differences between treatment of men, women or children in the DDR programme? \\n What kind of information will be gathered from combatants during the DDR process? Will the information collected be disaggregated by gender? Will it assess whether ex- combatants committed acts of sexual violence? \\n Will demobilized combatants have the opportunity to be reintegrated into a new army or police force? \\n Is the local community involved in the reintegration programme? \\n Will the reintegration programme consider or aim to provide benefits to the commu- nities where demobilized combatants will return?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to DDR \n Is there any form of conditionality that links DDR and justice measures, for example, amnesty or the promise of reduced sentences for combatants that enter the DDR program? \n What are the criteria for admittance into the DDR program? Do the criteria take into consideration the varied roles of women and children associated with armed forces and groups? \n Will there be any stipulated differences between treatment of men, women or children in the DDR programme? \n What kind of information will be gathered from combatants during the DDR process? Will the information collected be disaggregated by gender? Will it assess whether ex- combatants committed acts of sexual violence? \n Will demobilized combatants have the opportunity to be reintegrated into a new army or police force? \n Is the local community involved in the reintegration programme? \n Will the reintegration programme consider or aim to provide benefits to the commu- nities where demobilized combatants will return?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -206796,14 +206796,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Will there be any stipulated differences between treatment of men, women or children in the DDR programme?", + "Sentence": "\n Will there be any stipulated differences between treatment of men, women or children in the DDR programme?", "newParagraph": "question related ddr n form conditionality link ddr justice measure example amnesty promise reduced sentence combatant enter ddr program n criterion admittance ddr program criterion take consideration varied role woman child associated armed force group n stipulated difference treatment men woman child ddr programme n kind information gathered combatant ddr process information collected disaggregated gender ass whether ex combatant committed act sexual violence n demobilized combatant opportunity reintegrated new army police force n local community involved reintegration programme n reintegration programme consider aim provide benefit commu nities demobilized combatant return", "ProcessedSent": "n stipulated difference treatment men woman child ddr programme", "SentID": 11488 }, { "ParagraphID": 3204, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to DDR \\n Is there any form of conditionality that links DDR and justice measures, for example, amnesty or the promise of reduced sentences for combatants that enter the DDR program? \\n What are the criteria for admittance into the DDR program? Do the criteria take into consideration the varied roles of women and children associated with armed forces and groups? \\n Will there be any stipulated differences between treatment of men, women or children in the DDR programme? \\n What kind of information will be gathered from combatants during the DDR process? Will the information collected be disaggregated by gender? Will it assess whether ex- combatants committed acts of sexual violence? \\n Will demobilized combatants have the opportunity to be reintegrated into a new army or police force? \\n Is the local community involved in the reintegration programme? \\n Will the reintegration programme consider or aim to provide benefits to the commu- nities where demobilized combatants will return?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to DDR \n Is there any form of conditionality that links DDR and justice measures, for example, amnesty or the promise of reduced sentences for combatants that enter the DDR program? \n What are the criteria for admittance into the DDR program? Do the criteria take into consideration the varied roles of women and children associated with armed forces and groups? \n Will there be any stipulated differences between treatment of men, women or children in the DDR programme? \n What kind of information will be gathered from combatants during the DDR process? Will the information collected be disaggregated by gender? Will it assess whether ex- combatants committed acts of sexual violence? \n Will demobilized combatants have the opportunity to be reintegrated into a new army or police force? \n Is the local community involved in the reintegration programme? \n Will the reintegration programme consider or aim to provide benefits to the commu- nities where demobilized combatants will return?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -206814,14 +206814,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What kind of information will be gathered from combatants during the DDR process?", + "Sentence": "\n What kind of information will be gathered from combatants during the DDR process?", "newParagraph": "question related ddr n form conditionality link ddr justice measure example amnesty promise reduced sentence combatant enter ddr program n criterion admittance ddr program criterion take consideration varied role woman child associated armed force group n stipulated difference treatment men woman child ddr programme n kind information gathered combatant ddr process information collected disaggregated gender ass whether ex combatant committed act sexual violence n demobilized combatant opportunity reintegrated new army police force n local community involved reintegration programme n reintegration programme consider aim provide benefit commu nities demobilized combatant return", "ProcessedSent": "n kind information gathered combatant ddr process", "SentID": 11489 }, { "ParagraphID": 3204, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to DDR \\n Is there any form of conditionality that links DDR and justice measures, for example, amnesty or the promise of reduced sentences for combatants that enter the DDR program? \\n What are the criteria for admittance into the DDR program? Do the criteria take into consideration the varied roles of women and children associated with armed forces and groups? \\n Will there be any stipulated differences between treatment of men, women or children in the DDR programme? \\n What kind of information will be gathered from combatants during the DDR process? Will the information collected be disaggregated by gender? Will it assess whether ex- combatants committed acts of sexual violence? \\n Will demobilized combatants have the opportunity to be reintegrated into a new army or police force? \\n Is the local community involved in the reintegration programme? \\n Will the reintegration programme consider or aim to provide benefits to the commu- nities where demobilized combatants will return?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to DDR \n Is there any form of conditionality that links DDR and justice measures, for example, amnesty or the promise of reduced sentences for combatants that enter the DDR program? \n What are the criteria for admittance into the DDR program? Do the criteria take into consideration the varied roles of women and children associated with armed forces and groups? \n Will there be any stipulated differences between treatment of men, women or children in the DDR programme? \n What kind of information will be gathered from combatants during the DDR process? Will the information collected be disaggregated by gender? Will it assess whether ex- combatants committed acts of sexual violence? \n Will demobilized combatants have the opportunity to be reintegrated into a new army or police force? \n Is the local community involved in the reintegration programme? \n Will the reintegration programme consider or aim to provide benefits to the commu- nities where demobilized combatants will return?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -206839,7 +206839,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3204, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to DDR \\n Is there any form of conditionality that links DDR and justice measures, for example, amnesty or the promise of reduced sentences for combatants that enter the DDR program? \\n What are the criteria for admittance into the DDR program? Do the criteria take into consideration the varied roles of women and children associated with armed forces and groups? \\n Will there be any stipulated differences between treatment of men, women or children in the DDR programme? \\n What kind of information will be gathered from combatants during the DDR process? Will the information collected be disaggregated by gender? Will it assess whether ex- combatants committed acts of sexual violence? \\n Will demobilized combatants have the opportunity to be reintegrated into a new army or police force? \\n Is the local community involved in the reintegration programme? \\n Will the reintegration programme consider or aim to provide benefits to the commu- nities where demobilized combatants will return?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to DDR \n Is there any form of conditionality that links DDR and justice measures, for example, amnesty or the promise of reduced sentences for combatants that enter the DDR program? \n What are the criteria for admittance into the DDR program? Do the criteria take into consideration the varied roles of women and children associated with armed forces and groups? \n Will there be any stipulated differences between treatment of men, women or children in the DDR programme? \n What kind of information will be gathered from combatants during the DDR process? Will the information collected be disaggregated by gender? Will it assess whether ex- combatants committed acts of sexual violence? \n Will demobilized combatants have the opportunity to be reintegrated into a new army or police force? \n Is the local community involved in the reintegration programme? \n Will the reintegration programme consider or aim to provide benefits to the commu- nities where demobilized combatants will return?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -206857,7 +206857,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3204, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to DDR \\n Is there any form of conditionality that links DDR and justice measures, for example, amnesty or the promise of reduced sentences for combatants that enter the DDR program? \\n What are the criteria for admittance into the DDR program? Do the criteria take into consideration the varied roles of women and children associated with armed forces and groups? \\n Will there be any stipulated differences between treatment of men, women or children in the DDR programme? \\n What kind of information will be gathered from combatants during the DDR process? Will the information collected be disaggregated by gender? Will it assess whether ex- combatants committed acts of sexual violence? \\n Will demobilized combatants have the opportunity to be reintegrated into a new army or police force? \\n Is the local community involved in the reintegration programme? \\n Will the reintegration programme consider or aim to provide benefits to the commu- nities where demobilized combatants will return?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to DDR \n Is there any form of conditionality that links DDR and justice measures, for example, amnesty or the promise of reduced sentences for combatants that enter the DDR program? \n What are the criteria for admittance into the DDR program? Do the criteria take into consideration the varied roles of women and children associated with armed forces and groups? \n Will there be any stipulated differences between treatment of men, women or children in the DDR programme? \n What kind of information will be gathered from combatants during the DDR process? Will the information collected be disaggregated by gender? Will it assess whether ex- combatants committed acts of sexual violence? \n Will demobilized combatants have the opportunity to be reintegrated into a new army or police force? \n Is the local community involved in the reintegration programme? \n Will the reintegration programme consider or aim to provide benefits to the commu- nities where demobilized combatants will return?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -206868,14 +206868,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Will demobilized combatants have the opportunity to be reintegrated into a new army or police force?", + "Sentence": "\n Will demobilized combatants have the opportunity to be reintegrated into a new army or police force?", "newParagraph": "question related ddr n form conditionality link ddr justice measure example amnesty promise reduced sentence combatant enter ddr program n criterion admittance ddr program criterion take consideration varied role woman child associated armed force group n stipulated difference treatment men woman child ddr programme n kind information gathered combatant ddr process information collected disaggregated gender ass whether ex combatant committed act sexual violence n demobilized combatant opportunity reintegrated new army police force n local community involved reintegration programme n reintegration programme consider aim provide benefit commu nities demobilized combatant return", "ProcessedSent": "n demobilized combatant opportunity reintegrated new army police force", "SentID": 11492 }, { "ParagraphID": 3204, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to DDR \\n Is there any form of conditionality that links DDR and justice measures, for example, amnesty or the promise of reduced sentences for combatants that enter the DDR program? \\n What are the criteria for admittance into the DDR program? Do the criteria take into consideration the varied roles of women and children associated with armed forces and groups? \\n Will there be any stipulated differences between treatment of men, women or children in the DDR programme? \\n What kind of information will be gathered from combatants during the DDR process? Will the information collected be disaggregated by gender? Will it assess whether ex- combatants committed acts of sexual violence? \\n Will demobilized combatants have the opportunity to be reintegrated into a new army or police force? \\n Is the local community involved in the reintegration programme? \\n Will the reintegration programme consider or aim to provide benefits to the commu- nities where demobilized combatants will return?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to DDR \n Is there any form of conditionality that links DDR and justice measures, for example, amnesty or the promise of reduced sentences for combatants that enter the DDR program? \n What are the criteria for admittance into the DDR program? Do the criteria take into consideration the varied roles of women and children associated with armed forces and groups? \n Will there be any stipulated differences between treatment of men, women or children in the DDR programme? \n What kind of information will be gathered from combatants during the DDR process? Will the information collected be disaggregated by gender? Will it assess whether ex- combatants committed acts of sexual violence? \n Will demobilized combatants have the opportunity to be reintegrated into a new army or police force? \n Is the local community involved in the reintegration programme? \n Will the reintegration programme consider or aim to provide benefits to the commu- nities where demobilized combatants will return?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -206886,14 +206886,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Is the local community involved in the reintegration programme?", + "Sentence": "\n Is the local community involved in the reintegration programme?", "newParagraph": "question related ddr n form conditionality link ddr justice measure example amnesty promise reduced sentence combatant enter ddr program n criterion admittance ddr program criterion take consideration varied role woman child associated armed force group n stipulated difference treatment men woman child ddr programme n kind information gathered combatant ddr process information collected disaggregated gender ass whether ex combatant committed act sexual violence n demobilized combatant opportunity reintegrated new army police force n local community involved reintegration programme n reintegration programme consider aim provide benefit commu nities demobilized combatant return", "ProcessedSent": "n local community involved reintegration programme", "SentID": 11493 }, { "ParagraphID": 3204, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to DDR \\n Is there any form of conditionality that links DDR and justice measures, for example, amnesty or the promise of reduced sentences for combatants that enter the DDR program? \\n What are the criteria for admittance into the DDR program? Do the criteria take into consideration the varied roles of women and children associated with armed forces and groups? \\n Will there be any stipulated differences between treatment of men, women or children in the DDR programme? \\n What kind of information will be gathered from combatants during the DDR process? Will the information collected be disaggregated by gender? Will it assess whether ex- combatants committed acts of sexual violence? \\n Will demobilized combatants have the opportunity to be reintegrated into a new army or police force? \\n Is the local community involved in the reintegration programme? \\n Will the reintegration programme consider or aim to provide benefits to the commu- nities where demobilized combatants will return?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to DDR \n Is there any form of conditionality that links DDR and justice measures, for example, amnesty or the promise of reduced sentences for combatants that enter the DDR program? \n What are the criteria for admittance into the DDR program? Do the criteria take into consideration the varied roles of women and children associated with armed forces and groups? \n Will there be any stipulated differences between treatment of men, women or children in the DDR programme? \n What kind of information will be gathered from combatants during the DDR process? Will the information collected be disaggregated by gender? Will it assess whether ex- combatants committed acts of sexual violence? \n Will demobilized combatants have the opportunity to be reintegrated into a new army or police force? \n Is the local community involved in the reintegration programme? \n Will the reintegration programme consider or aim to provide benefits to the commu- nities where demobilized combatants will return?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -206904,14 +206904,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Will the reintegration programme consider or aim to provide benefits to the commu- nities where demobilized combatants will return?", + "Sentence": "\n Will the reintegration programme consider or aim to provide benefits to the commu- nities where demobilized combatants will return?", "newParagraph": "question related ddr n form conditionality link ddr justice measure example amnesty promise reduced sentence combatant enter ddr program n criterion admittance ddr program criterion take consideration varied role woman child associated armed force group n stipulated difference treatment men woman child ddr programme n kind information gathered combatant ddr process information collected disaggregated gender ass whether ex combatant committed act sexual violence n demobilized combatant opportunity reintegrated new army police force n local community involved reintegration programme n reintegration programme consider aim provide benefit commu nities demobilized combatant return", "ProcessedSent": "n reintegration programme consider aim provide benefit commu nities demobilized combatant return", "SentID": 11494 }, { "ParagraphID": 3205, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \\n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \\n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \\n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \\n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \\n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \\n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \\n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \\n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \\n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \\n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -206922,14 +206922,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Questions related to transitional justice \\n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues?", + "Sentence": "Questions related to transitional justice \n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues?", "newParagraph": "question related transitional justice n office united nation peacekeeping mission andor un agency focal point transitional justice human right rule law issue n government entity focal point transitional justice human right rule law issue n national truth commission truthseeking initiative example local regional level country n investigation andor prosecution perpetrator crime involving violation international human right law international humanitarian law occurred conflict n truth commission prosecution process specific outreach strategy dealing excombatants n truth commission prosecution process public information reach capacity kind information disseminated reaching vulnerable marginalized group including excombatants communicating mandate operation n plan offer reparation victim community ravaged conflict targeted beneficiary reparation woman survivor sexual violence considered reparation programme female excombatants waafg child reparation distributed reparation distributed funding could fund reparation programme n reparation tied transitional justice measure prosecution truthtelling institutional reform andor local justice initiative n institutional reform vetting mandated part peace agreement postconflict legal framework security sector institution targeted reform accountability mechanism set address integrity security sector personnel n justice reconciliation effort localcommunity level n involvement woman andor child locally based justice rec onciliation initiative n criterion determining could participate locally based justice reconciliation initiative n locally based justice reconciliation initiative linked tran sitional justice measure prosecution truthtelling andor reparation", "ProcessedSent": "question related transitional justice n office united nation peacekeeping mission andor un agency focal point transitional justice human right rule law issue", "SentID": 11495 }, { "ParagraphID": 3205, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \\n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \\n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \\n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \\n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \\n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \\n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \\n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \\n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \\n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \\n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -206940,14 +206940,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues?", + "Sentence": "\n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues?", "newParagraph": "question related transitional justice n office united nation peacekeeping mission andor un agency focal point transitional justice human right rule law issue n government entity focal point transitional justice human right rule law issue n national truth commission truthseeking initiative example local regional level country n investigation andor prosecution perpetrator crime involving violation international human right law international humanitarian law occurred conflict n truth commission prosecution process specific outreach strategy dealing excombatants n truth commission prosecution process public information reach capacity kind information disseminated reaching vulnerable marginalized group including excombatants communicating mandate operation n plan offer reparation victim community ravaged conflict targeted beneficiary reparation woman survivor sexual violence considered reparation programme female excombatants waafg child reparation distributed reparation distributed funding could fund reparation programme n reparation tied transitional justice measure prosecution truthtelling institutional reform andor local justice initiative n institutional reform vetting mandated part peace agreement postconflict legal framework security sector institution targeted reform accountability mechanism set address integrity security sector personnel n justice reconciliation effort localcommunity level n involvement woman andor child locally based justice rec onciliation initiative n criterion determining could participate locally based justice reconciliation initiative n locally based justice reconciliation initiative linked tran sitional justice measure prosecution truthtelling andor reparation", "ProcessedSent": "n government entity focal point transitional justice human right rule law issue", "SentID": 11496 }, { "ParagraphID": 3205, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \\n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \\n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \\n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \\n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \\n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \\n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \\n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \\n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \\n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \\n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -206958,14 +206958,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Is there a national truth commission?", + "Sentence": "\n Is there a national truth commission?", "newParagraph": "question related transitional justice n office united nation peacekeeping mission andor un agency focal point transitional justice human right rule law issue n government entity focal point transitional justice human right rule law issue n national truth commission truthseeking initiative example local regional level country n investigation andor prosecution perpetrator crime involving violation international human right law international humanitarian law occurred conflict n truth commission prosecution process specific outreach strategy dealing excombatants n truth commission prosecution process public information reach capacity kind information disseminated reaching vulnerable marginalized group including excombatants communicating mandate operation n plan offer reparation victim community ravaged conflict targeted beneficiary reparation woman survivor sexual violence considered reparation programme female excombatants waafg child reparation distributed reparation distributed funding could fund reparation programme n reparation tied transitional justice measure prosecution truthtelling institutional reform andor local justice initiative n institutional reform vetting mandated part peace agreement postconflict legal framework security sector institution targeted reform accountability mechanism set address integrity security sector personnel n justice reconciliation effort localcommunity level n involvement woman andor child locally based justice rec onciliation initiative n criterion determining could participate locally based justice reconciliation initiative n locally based justice reconciliation initiative linked tran sitional justice measure prosecution truthtelling andor reparation", "ProcessedSent": "n national truth commission", "SentID": 11497 }, { "ParagraphID": 3205, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \\n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \\n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \\n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \\n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \\n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \\n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \\n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \\n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \\n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \\n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -206983,7 +206983,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3205, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \\n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \\n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \\n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \\n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \\n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \\n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \\n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \\n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \\n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \\n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -206994,14 +206994,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict?", + "Sentence": "\n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict?", "newParagraph": "question related transitional justice n office united nation peacekeeping mission andor un agency focal point transitional justice human right rule law issue n government entity focal point transitional justice human right rule law issue n national truth commission truthseeking initiative example local regional level country n investigation andor prosecution perpetrator crime involving violation international human right law international humanitarian law occurred conflict n truth commission prosecution process specific outreach strategy dealing excombatants n truth commission prosecution process public information reach capacity kind information disseminated reaching vulnerable marginalized group including excombatants communicating mandate operation n plan offer reparation victim community ravaged conflict targeted beneficiary reparation woman survivor sexual violence considered reparation programme female excombatants waafg child reparation distributed reparation distributed funding could fund reparation programme n reparation tied transitional justice measure prosecution truthtelling institutional reform andor local justice initiative n institutional reform vetting mandated part peace agreement postconflict legal framework security sector institution targeted reform accountability mechanism set address integrity security sector personnel n justice reconciliation effort localcommunity level n involvement woman andor child locally based justice rec onciliation initiative n criterion determining could participate locally based justice reconciliation initiative n locally based justice reconciliation initiative linked tran sitional justice measure prosecution truthtelling andor reparation", "ProcessedSent": "n investigation andor prosecution perpetrator crime involving violation international human right law international humanitarian law occurred conflict", "SentID": 11499 }, { "ParagraphID": 3205, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \\n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \\n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \\n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \\n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \\n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \\n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \\n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \\n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \\n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \\n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207012,14 +207012,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants?", + "Sentence": "\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants?", "newParagraph": "question related transitional justice n office united nation peacekeeping mission andor un agency focal point transitional justice human right rule law issue n government entity focal point transitional justice human right rule law issue n national truth commission truthseeking initiative example local regional level country n investigation andor prosecution perpetrator crime involving violation international human right law international humanitarian law occurred conflict n truth commission prosecution process specific outreach strategy dealing excombatants n truth commission prosecution process public information reach capacity kind information disseminated reaching vulnerable marginalized group including excombatants communicating mandate operation n plan offer reparation victim community ravaged conflict targeted beneficiary reparation woman survivor sexual violence considered reparation programme female excombatants waafg child reparation distributed reparation distributed funding could fund reparation programme n reparation tied transitional justice measure prosecution truthtelling institutional reform andor local justice initiative n institutional reform vetting mandated part peace agreement postconflict legal framework security sector institution targeted reform accountability mechanism set address integrity security sector personnel n justice reconciliation effort localcommunity level n involvement woman andor child locally based justice rec onciliation initiative n criterion determining could participate locally based justice reconciliation initiative n locally based justice reconciliation initiative linked tran sitional justice measure prosecution truthtelling andor reparation", "ProcessedSent": "n truth commission prosecution process specific outreach strategy dealing excombatants", "SentID": 11500 }, { "ParagraphID": 3205, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \\n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \\n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \\n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \\n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \\n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \\n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \\n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \\n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \\n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \\n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207030,14 +207030,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity?", + "Sentence": "\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity?", "newParagraph": "question related transitional justice n office united nation peacekeeping mission andor un agency focal point transitional justice human right rule law issue n government entity focal point transitional justice human right rule law issue n national truth commission truthseeking initiative example local regional level country n investigation andor prosecution perpetrator crime involving violation international human right law international humanitarian law occurred conflict n truth commission prosecution process specific outreach strategy dealing excombatants n truth commission prosecution process public information reach capacity kind information disseminated reaching vulnerable marginalized group including excombatants communicating mandate operation n plan offer reparation victim community ravaged conflict targeted beneficiary reparation woman survivor sexual violence considered reparation programme female excombatants waafg child reparation distributed reparation distributed funding could fund reparation programme n reparation tied transitional justice measure prosecution truthtelling institutional reform andor local justice initiative n institutional reform vetting mandated part peace agreement postconflict legal framework security sector institution targeted reform accountability mechanism set address integrity security sector personnel n justice reconciliation effort localcommunity level n involvement woman andor child locally based justice rec onciliation initiative n criterion determining could participate locally based justice reconciliation initiative n locally based justice reconciliation initiative linked tran sitional justice measure prosecution truthtelling andor reparation", "ProcessedSent": "n truth commission prosecution process public information reach capacity", "SentID": 11501 }, { "ParagraphID": 3205, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \\n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \\n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \\n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \\n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \\n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \\n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \\n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \\n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \\n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \\n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207055,7 +207055,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3205, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \\n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \\n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \\n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \\n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \\n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \\n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \\n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \\n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \\n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \\n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207073,7 +207073,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3205, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \\n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \\n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \\n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \\n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \\n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \\n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \\n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \\n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \\n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \\n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207084,14 +207084,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict?", + "Sentence": "\n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict?", "newParagraph": "question related transitional justice n office united nation peacekeeping mission andor un agency focal point transitional justice human right rule law issue n government entity focal point transitional justice human right rule law issue n national truth commission truthseeking initiative example local regional level country n investigation andor prosecution perpetrator crime involving violation international human right law international humanitarian law occurred conflict n truth commission prosecution process specific outreach strategy dealing excombatants n truth commission prosecution process public information reach capacity kind information disseminated reaching vulnerable marginalized group including excombatants communicating mandate operation n plan offer reparation victim community ravaged conflict targeted beneficiary reparation woman survivor sexual violence considered reparation programme female excombatants waafg child reparation distributed reparation distributed funding could fund reparation programme n reparation tied transitional justice measure prosecution truthtelling institutional reform andor local justice initiative n institutional reform vetting mandated part peace agreement postconflict legal framework security sector institution targeted reform accountability mechanism set address integrity security sector personnel n justice reconciliation effort localcommunity level n involvement woman andor child locally based justice rec onciliation initiative n criterion determining could participate locally based justice reconciliation initiative n locally based justice reconciliation initiative linked tran sitional justice measure prosecution truthtelling andor reparation", "ProcessedSent": "n plan offer reparation victim community ravaged conflict", "SentID": 11504 }, { "ParagraphID": 3205, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \\n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \\n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \\n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \\n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \\n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \\n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \\n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \\n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \\n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \\n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207109,7 +207109,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3205, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \\n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \\n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \\n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \\n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \\n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \\n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \\n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \\n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \\n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \\n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207127,7 +207127,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3205, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \\n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \\n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \\n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \\n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \\n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \\n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \\n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \\n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \\n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \\n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207145,7 +207145,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3205, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \\n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \\n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \\n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \\n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \\n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \\n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \\n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \\n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \\n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \\n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207163,7 +207163,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3205, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \\n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \\n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \\n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \\n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \\n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \\n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \\n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \\n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \\n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \\n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207181,7 +207181,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3205, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \\n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \\n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \\n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \\n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \\n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \\n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \\n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \\n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \\n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \\n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207192,14 +207192,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives?", + "Sentence": "\n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives?", "newParagraph": "question related transitional justice n office united nation peacekeeping mission andor un agency focal point transitional justice human right rule law issue n government entity focal point transitional justice human right rule law issue n national truth commission truthseeking initiative example local regional level country n investigation andor prosecution perpetrator crime involving violation international human right law international humanitarian law occurred conflict n truth commission prosecution process specific outreach strategy dealing excombatants n truth commission prosecution process public information reach capacity kind information disseminated reaching vulnerable marginalized group including excombatants communicating mandate operation n plan offer reparation victim community ravaged conflict targeted beneficiary reparation woman survivor sexual violence considered reparation programme female excombatants waafg child reparation distributed reparation distributed funding could fund reparation programme n reparation tied transitional justice measure prosecution truthtelling institutional reform andor local justice initiative n institutional reform vetting mandated part peace agreement postconflict legal framework security sector institution targeted reform accountability mechanism set address integrity security sector personnel n justice reconciliation effort localcommunity level n involvement woman andor child locally based justice rec onciliation initiative n criterion determining could participate locally based justice reconciliation initiative n locally based justice reconciliation initiative linked tran sitional justice measure prosecution truthtelling andor reparation", "ProcessedSent": "n reparation tied transitional justice measure prosecution truthtelling institutional reform andor local justice initiative", "SentID": 11510 }, { "ParagraphID": 3205, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \\n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \\n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \\n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \\n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \\n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \\n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \\n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \\n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \\n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \\n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207210,14 +207210,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework?", + "Sentence": "\n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework?", "newParagraph": "question related transitional justice n office united nation peacekeeping mission andor un agency focal point transitional justice human right rule law issue n government entity focal point transitional justice human right rule law issue n national truth commission truthseeking initiative example local regional level country n investigation andor prosecution perpetrator crime involving violation international human right law international humanitarian law occurred conflict n truth commission prosecution process specific outreach strategy dealing excombatants n truth commission prosecution process public information reach capacity kind information disseminated reaching vulnerable marginalized group including excombatants communicating mandate operation n plan offer reparation victim community ravaged conflict targeted beneficiary reparation woman survivor sexual violence considered reparation programme female excombatants waafg child reparation distributed reparation distributed funding could fund reparation programme n reparation tied transitional justice measure prosecution truthtelling institutional reform andor local justice initiative n institutional reform vetting mandated part peace agreement postconflict legal framework security sector institution targeted reform accountability mechanism set address integrity security sector personnel n justice reconciliation effort localcommunity level n involvement woman andor child locally based justice rec onciliation initiative n criterion determining could participate locally based justice reconciliation initiative n locally based justice reconciliation initiative linked tran sitional justice measure prosecution truthtelling andor reparation", "ProcessedSent": "n institutional reform vetting mandated part peace agreement postconflict legal framework", "SentID": 11511 }, { "ParagraphID": 3205, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \\n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \\n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \\n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \\n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \\n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \\n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \\n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \\n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \\n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \\n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207235,7 +207235,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3205, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \\n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \\n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \\n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \\n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \\n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \\n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \\n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \\n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \\n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \\n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207253,7 +207253,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3205, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \\n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \\n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \\n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \\n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \\n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \\n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \\n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \\n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \\n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \\n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207264,14 +207264,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level?", + "Sentence": "\n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level?", "newParagraph": "question related transitional justice n office united nation peacekeeping mission andor un agency focal point transitional justice human right rule law issue n government entity focal point transitional justice human right rule law issue n national truth commission truthseeking initiative example local regional level country n investigation andor prosecution perpetrator crime involving violation international human right law international humanitarian law occurred conflict n truth commission prosecution process specific outreach strategy dealing excombatants n truth commission prosecution process public information reach capacity kind information disseminated reaching vulnerable marginalized group including excombatants communicating mandate operation n plan offer reparation victim community ravaged conflict targeted beneficiary reparation woman survivor sexual violence considered reparation programme female excombatants waafg child reparation distributed reparation distributed funding could fund reparation programme n reparation tied transitional justice measure prosecution truthtelling institutional reform andor local justice initiative n institutional reform vetting mandated part peace agreement postconflict legal framework security sector institution targeted reform accountability mechanism set address integrity security sector personnel n justice reconciliation effort localcommunity level n involvement woman andor child locally based justice rec onciliation initiative n criterion determining could participate locally based justice reconciliation initiative n locally based justice reconciliation initiative linked tran sitional justice measure prosecution truthtelling andor reparation", "ProcessedSent": "n justice reconciliation effort localcommunity level", "SentID": 11514 }, { "ParagraphID": 3205, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \\n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \\n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \\n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \\n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \\n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \\n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \\n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \\n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \\n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \\n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207282,14 +207282,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives?", + "Sentence": "\n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives?", "newParagraph": "question related transitional justice n office united nation peacekeeping mission andor un agency focal point transitional justice human right rule law issue n government entity focal point transitional justice human right rule law issue n national truth commission truthseeking initiative example local regional level country n investigation andor prosecution perpetrator crime involving violation international human right law international humanitarian law occurred conflict n truth commission prosecution process specific outreach strategy dealing excombatants n truth commission prosecution process public information reach capacity kind information disseminated reaching vulnerable marginalized group including excombatants communicating mandate operation n plan offer reparation victim community ravaged conflict targeted beneficiary reparation woman survivor sexual violence considered reparation programme female excombatants waafg child reparation distributed reparation distributed funding could fund reparation programme n reparation tied transitional justice measure prosecution truthtelling institutional reform andor local justice initiative n institutional reform vetting mandated part peace agreement postconflict legal framework security sector institution targeted reform accountability mechanism set address integrity security sector personnel n justice reconciliation effort localcommunity level n involvement woman andor child locally based justice rec onciliation initiative n criterion determining could participate locally based justice reconciliation initiative n locally based justice reconciliation initiative linked tran sitional justice measure prosecution truthtelling andor reparation", "ProcessedSent": "n involvement woman andor child locally based justice rec onciliation initiative", "SentID": 11515 }, { "ParagraphID": 3205, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \\n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \\n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \\n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \\n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \\n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \\n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \\n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \\n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \\n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \\n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207300,14 +207300,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives?", + "Sentence": "\n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives?", "newParagraph": "question related transitional justice n office united nation peacekeeping mission andor un agency focal point transitional justice human right rule law issue n government entity focal point transitional justice human right rule law issue n national truth commission truthseeking initiative example local regional level country n investigation andor prosecution perpetrator crime involving violation international human right law international humanitarian law occurred conflict n truth commission prosecution process specific outreach strategy dealing excombatants n truth commission prosecution process public information reach capacity kind information disseminated reaching vulnerable marginalized group including excombatants communicating mandate operation n plan offer reparation victim community ravaged conflict targeted beneficiary reparation woman survivor sexual violence considered reparation programme female excombatants waafg child reparation distributed reparation distributed funding could fund reparation programme n reparation tied transitional justice measure prosecution truthtelling institutional reform andor local justice initiative n institutional reform vetting mandated part peace agreement postconflict legal framework security sector institution targeted reform accountability mechanism set address integrity security sector personnel n justice reconciliation effort localcommunity level n involvement woman andor child locally based justice rec onciliation initiative n criterion determining could participate locally based justice reconciliation initiative n locally based justice reconciliation initiative linked tran sitional justice measure prosecution truthtelling andor reparation", "ProcessedSent": "n criterion determining could participate locally based justice reconciliation initiative", "SentID": 11516 }, { "ParagraphID": 3205, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \\n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \\n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \\n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \\n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \\n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \\n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \\n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \\n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \\n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \\n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \\n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to transitional justice \n What office in the United Nations peacekeeping mission and\/or what UN agency is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights, and rule of law issues? \n What government entity is the focal point on transitional justice, human rights and rule of law issues? \n Is there a national truth commission? Are there any other truth-seeking initiatives, for example at the local or regional level of the country? \n Are there any investigations and\/or prosecutions of perpetrators of crimes involving violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that occurred during the conflict? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have any specific outreach to, or strategy for dealing with, ex-combatants? \n Does the truth commission or prosecutions process have a public information or out- reach capacity? What kind of information is being disseminated? How are they reaching out to vulnerable, marginalized groups including ex-combatants in communicating mandate and operations? \n Are there plans to offer reparations to victims or communities ravaged by the conflict? Who are the targeted beneficiaries of the reparations? How are women survivors of sexual violence considered in reparations programmes, female ex-combatants, WAAFG, children? When will reparations be distributed? How will reparations distributed? Who is funding or could fund the reparation programme? \n Are reparations tied to any other transitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling, institutional reform and\/or local justice initiatives? \n Is institutional reform, such as vetting, mandated as part of the peace agreement or post-conflict legal framework? Are security sector institutions targeted for such reform? Are there any accountability mechanisms set up to address the integrity of the security sector personnel? \n Are there any justice or reconciliation efforts at the local\/community level? \n What is the involvement of women and\/or children in locally based justice and rec- onciliation initiatives? \n What is the criterion for determining who could participate in locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207318,14 +207318,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", + "Sentence": "\n Are these locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives linked to any other tran- sitional justice measures such as prosecutions, truth-telling and\/or reparations?", "newParagraph": "question related transitional justice n office united nation peacekeeping mission andor un agency focal point transitional justice human right rule law issue n government entity focal point transitional justice human right rule law issue n national truth commission truthseeking initiative example local regional level country n investigation andor prosecution perpetrator crime involving violation international human right law international humanitarian law occurred conflict n truth commission prosecution process specific outreach strategy dealing excombatants n truth commission prosecution process public information reach capacity kind information disseminated reaching vulnerable marginalized group including excombatants communicating mandate operation n plan offer reparation victim community ravaged conflict targeted beneficiary reparation woman survivor sexual violence considered reparation programme female excombatants waafg child reparation distributed reparation distributed funding could fund reparation programme n reparation tied transitional justice measure prosecution truthtelling institutional reform andor local justice initiative n institutional reform vetting mandated part peace agreement postconflict legal framework security sector institution targeted reform accountability mechanism set address integrity security sector personnel n justice reconciliation effort localcommunity level n involvement woman andor child locally based justice rec onciliation initiative n criterion determining could participate locally based justice reconciliation initiative n locally based justice reconciliation initiative linked tran sitional justice measure prosecution truthtelling andor reparation", "ProcessedSent": "n locally based justice reconciliation initiative linked tran sitional justice measure prosecution truthtelling andor reparation", "SentID": 11517 }, { "ParagraphID": 3206, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to possibilities for coordination \\n Will the planned timetable for the DDR programme overlap with planned transitional justice measures? \\n Are there opportunities to coordinate information strategies around DDR and transi- tional justice measures? \\n Will ex-combatants be screened on human rights criteria as part of the DDR programme? Can the DDR programme integrate human rights education and\/or information ses- sions that specifically provide information on transitional justice? \\n Can the DDR programme provide incentives for ex-combatants to participate in pros- ecutions processes or truth-seeking initiatives? \\n Will there be any screening on human rights criteria of those ex-combatants interested in staying in or joining the security forces? \\n How can the DDR programme support or coordinate with other initiatives that address justice for women and justice for children? \\n Can any information gathered during the DDR programme be shared with a truth com- mission or prosecutions process? \\n How do the benefits offered to ex-combatants in the DDR programme compare to any reparations offered to victims of the armed conflict? \\n Can the benefits provided to ex-combatants be considered in light of reparations offered to victims? Is coordination between these two mechanisms possible? \\n Are there opportunities to connect the reintegration programme with locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? For example, can any benefits provided to the community include support for locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Can the reintegration programme include a component that involves ex-combatants in efforts to rebuild communities that have been physically destroyed as a result of the armed conflict? \\n Does the monitoring and assessment of the DDR programme include assessment of the impact of the programme on human rights, justice, and rule of law?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to possibilities for coordination \n Will the planned timetable for the DDR programme overlap with planned transitional justice measures? \n Are there opportunities to coordinate information strategies around DDR and transi- tional justice measures? \n Will ex-combatants be screened on human rights criteria as part of the DDR programme? Can the DDR programme integrate human rights education and\/or information ses- sions that specifically provide information on transitional justice? \n Can the DDR programme provide incentives for ex-combatants to participate in pros- ecutions processes or truth-seeking initiatives? \n Will there be any screening on human rights criteria of those ex-combatants interested in staying in or joining the security forces? \n How can the DDR programme support or coordinate with other initiatives that address justice for women and justice for children? \n Can any information gathered during the DDR programme be shared with a truth com- mission or prosecutions process? \n How do the benefits offered to ex-combatants in the DDR programme compare to any reparations offered to victims of the armed conflict? \n Can the benefits provided to ex-combatants be considered in light of reparations offered to victims? Is coordination between these two mechanisms possible? \n Are there opportunities to connect the reintegration programme with locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? For example, can any benefits provided to the community include support for locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Can the reintegration programme include a component that involves ex-combatants in efforts to rebuild communities that have been physically destroyed as a result of the armed conflict? \n Does the monitoring and assessment of the DDR programme include assessment of the impact of the programme on human rights, justice, and rule of law?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207336,14 +207336,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Questions related to possibilities for coordination \\n Will the planned timetable for the DDR programme overlap with planned transitional justice measures?", + "Sentence": "Questions related to possibilities for coordination \n Will the planned timetable for the DDR programme overlap with planned transitional justice measures?", "newParagraph": "question related possibility coordination n planned timetable ddr programme overlap planned transitional justice measure n opportunity coordinate information strategy around ddr transi tional justice measure n excombatants screened human right criterion part ddr programme ddr programme integrate human right education andor information s sion specifically provide information transitional justice n ddr programme provide incentive excombatants participate pro ecutions process truthseeking initiative n screening human right criterion excombatants interested staying joining security force n ddr programme support coordinate initiative address justice woman justice child n information gathered ddr programme shared truth com mission prosecution process n benefit offered excombatants ddr programme compare reparation offered victim armed conflict n benefit provided excombatants considered light reparation offered victim coordination two mechanism possible n opportunity connect reintegration programme locally based justice reconciliation initiative example benefit provided community include support locally based justice reconciliation initiative n reintegration programme include component involves excombatants effort rebuild community physically destroyed result armed conflict n monitoring assessment ddr programme include assessment impact programme human right justice rule law", "ProcessedSent": "question related possibility coordination n planned timetable ddr programme overlap planned transitional justice measure", "SentID": 11518 }, { "ParagraphID": 3206, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to possibilities for coordination \\n Will the planned timetable for the DDR programme overlap with planned transitional justice measures? \\n Are there opportunities to coordinate information strategies around DDR and transi- tional justice measures? \\n Will ex-combatants be screened on human rights criteria as part of the DDR programme? Can the DDR programme integrate human rights education and\/or information ses- sions that specifically provide information on transitional justice? \\n Can the DDR programme provide incentives for ex-combatants to participate in pros- ecutions processes or truth-seeking initiatives? \\n Will there be any screening on human rights criteria of those ex-combatants interested in staying in or joining the security forces? \\n How can the DDR programme support or coordinate with other initiatives that address justice for women and justice for children? \\n Can any information gathered during the DDR programme be shared with a truth com- mission or prosecutions process? \\n How do the benefits offered to ex-combatants in the DDR programme compare to any reparations offered to victims of the armed conflict? \\n Can the benefits provided to ex-combatants be considered in light of reparations offered to victims? Is coordination between these two mechanisms possible? \\n Are there opportunities to connect the reintegration programme with locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? For example, can any benefits provided to the community include support for locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Can the reintegration programme include a component that involves ex-combatants in efforts to rebuild communities that have been physically destroyed as a result of the armed conflict? \\n Does the monitoring and assessment of the DDR programme include assessment of the impact of the programme on human rights, justice, and rule of law?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to possibilities for coordination \n Will the planned timetable for the DDR programme overlap with planned transitional justice measures? \n Are there opportunities to coordinate information strategies around DDR and transi- tional justice measures? \n Will ex-combatants be screened on human rights criteria as part of the DDR programme? Can the DDR programme integrate human rights education and\/or information ses- sions that specifically provide information on transitional justice? \n Can the DDR programme provide incentives for ex-combatants to participate in pros- ecutions processes or truth-seeking initiatives? \n Will there be any screening on human rights criteria of those ex-combatants interested in staying in or joining the security forces? \n How can the DDR programme support or coordinate with other initiatives that address justice for women and justice for children? \n Can any information gathered during the DDR programme be shared with a truth com- mission or prosecutions process? \n How do the benefits offered to ex-combatants in the DDR programme compare to any reparations offered to victims of the armed conflict? \n Can the benefits provided to ex-combatants be considered in light of reparations offered to victims? Is coordination between these two mechanisms possible? \n Are there opportunities to connect the reintegration programme with locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? For example, can any benefits provided to the community include support for locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Can the reintegration programme include a component that involves ex-combatants in efforts to rebuild communities that have been physically destroyed as a result of the armed conflict? \n Does the monitoring and assessment of the DDR programme include assessment of the impact of the programme on human rights, justice, and rule of law?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207354,14 +207354,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Are there opportunities to coordinate information strategies around DDR and transi- tional justice measures?", + "Sentence": "\n Are there opportunities to coordinate information strategies around DDR and transi- tional justice measures?", "newParagraph": "question related possibility coordination n planned timetable ddr programme overlap planned transitional justice measure n opportunity coordinate information strategy around ddr transi tional justice measure n excombatants screened human right criterion part ddr programme ddr programme integrate human right education andor information s sion specifically provide information transitional justice n ddr programme provide incentive excombatants participate pro ecutions process truthseeking initiative n screening human right criterion excombatants interested staying joining security force n ddr programme support coordinate initiative address justice woman justice child n information gathered ddr programme shared truth com mission prosecution process n benefit offered excombatants ddr programme compare reparation offered victim armed conflict n benefit provided excombatants considered light reparation offered victim coordination two mechanism possible n opportunity connect reintegration programme locally based justice reconciliation initiative example benefit provided community include support locally based justice reconciliation initiative n reintegration programme include component involves excombatants effort rebuild community physically destroyed result armed conflict n monitoring assessment ddr programme include assessment impact programme human right justice rule law", "ProcessedSent": "n opportunity coordinate information strategy around ddr transi tional justice measure", "SentID": 11519 }, { "ParagraphID": 3206, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to possibilities for coordination \\n Will the planned timetable for the DDR programme overlap with planned transitional justice measures? \\n Are there opportunities to coordinate information strategies around DDR and transi- tional justice measures? \\n Will ex-combatants be screened on human rights criteria as part of the DDR programme? Can the DDR programme integrate human rights education and\/or information ses- sions that specifically provide information on transitional justice? \\n Can the DDR programme provide incentives for ex-combatants to participate in pros- ecutions processes or truth-seeking initiatives? \\n Will there be any screening on human rights criteria of those ex-combatants interested in staying in or joining the security forces? \\n How can the DDR programme support or coordinate with other initiatives that address justice for women and justice for children? \\n Can any information gathered during the DDR programme be shared with a truth com- mission or prosecutions process? \\n How do the benefits offered to ex-combatants in the DDR programme compare to any reparations offered to victims of the armed conflict? \\n Can the benefits provided to ex-combatants be considered in light of reparations offered to victims? Is coordination between these two mechanisms possible? \\n Are there opportunities to connect the reintegration programme with locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? For example, can any benefits provided to the community include support for locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Can the reintegration programme include a component that involves ex-combatants in efforts to rebuild communities that have been physically destroyed as a result of the armed conflict? \\n Does the monitoring and assessment of the DDR programme include assessment of the impact of the programme on human rights, justice, and rule of law?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to possibilities for coordination \n Will the planned timetable for the DDR programme overlap with planned transitional justice measures? \n Are there opportunities to coordinate information strategies around DDR and transi- tional justice measures? \n Will ex-combatants be screened on human rights criteria as part of the DDR programme? Can the DDR programme integrate human rights education and\/or information ses- sions that specifically provide information on transitional justice? \n Can the DDR programme provide incentives for ex-combatants to participate in pros- ecutions processes or truth-seeking initiatives? \n Will there be any screening on human rights criteria of those ex-combatants interested in staying in or joining the security forces? \n How can the DDR programme support or coordinate with other initiatives that address justice for women and justice for children? \n Can any information gathered during the DDR programme be shared with a truth com- mission or prosecutions process? \n How do the benefits offered to ex-combatants in the DDR programme compare to any reparations offered to victims of the armed conflict? \n Can the benefits provided to ex-combatants be considered in light of reparations offered to victims? Is coordination between these two mechanisms possible? \n Are there opportunities to connect the reintegration programme with locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? For example, can any benefits provided to the community include support for locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Can the reintegration programme include a component that involves ex-combatants in efforts to rebuild communities that have been physically destroyed as a result of the armed conflict? \n Does the monitoring and assessment of the DDR programme include assessment of the impact of the programme on human rights, justice, and rule of law?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207372,14 +207372,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Will ex-combatants be screened on human rights criteria as part of the DDR programme?", + "Sentence": "\n Will ex-combatants be screened on human rights criteria as part of the DDR programme?", "newParagraph": "question related possibility coordination n planned timetable ddr programme overlap planned transitional justice measure n opportunity coordinate information strategy around ddr transi tional justice measure n excombatants screened human right criterion part ddr programme ddr programme integrate human right education andor information s sion specifically provide information transitional justice n ddr programme provide incentive excombatants participate pro ecutions process truthseeking initiative n screening human right criterion excombatants interested staying joining security force n ddr programme support coordinate initiative address justice woman justice child n information gathered ddr programme shared truth com mission prosecution process n benefit offered excombatants ddr programme compare reparation offered victim armed conflict n benefit provided excombatants considered light reparation offered victim coordination two mechanism possible n opportunity connect reintegration programme locally based justice reconciliation initiative example benefit provided community include support locally based justice reconciliation initiative n reintegration programme include component involves excombatants effort rebuild community physically destroyed result armed conflict n monitoring assessment ddr programme include assessment impact programme human right justice rule law", "ProcessedSent": "n excombatants screened human right criterion part ddr programme", "SentID": 11520 }, { "ParagraphID": 3206, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to possibilities for coordination \\n Will the planned timetable for the DDR programme overlap with planned transitional justice measures? \\n Are there opportunities to coordinate information strategies around DDR and transi- tional justice measures? \\n Will ex-combatants be screened on human rights criteria as part of the DDR programme? Can the DDR programme integrate human rights education and\/or information ses- sions that specifically provide information on transitional justice? \\n Can the DDR programme provide incentives for ex-combatants to participate in pros- ecutions processes or truth-seeking initiatives? \\n Will there be any screening on human rights criteria of those ex-combatants interested in staying in or joining the security forces? \\n How can the DDR programme support or coordinate with other initiatives that address justice for women and justice for children? \\n Can any information gathered during the DDR programme be shared with a truth com- mission or prosecutions process? \\n How do the benefits offered to ex-combatants in the DDR programme compare to any reparations offered to victims of the armed conflict? \\n Can the benefits provided to ex-combatants be considered in light of reparations offered to victims? Is coordination between these two mechanisms possible? \\n Are there opportunities to connect the reintegration programme with locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? For example, can any benefits provided to the community include support for locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Can the reintegration programme include a component that involves ex-combatants in efforts to rebuild communities that have been physically destroyed as a result of the armed conflict? \\n Does the monitoring and assessment of the DDR programme include assessment of the impact of the programme on human rights, justice, and rule of law?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to possibilities for coordination \n Will the planned timetable for the DDR programme overlap with planned transitional justice measures? \n Are there opportunities to coordinate information strategies around DDR and transi- tional justice measures? \n Will ex-combatants be screened on human rights criteria as part of the DDR programme? Can the DDR programme integrate human rights education and\/or information ses- sions that specifically provide information on transitional justice? \n Can the DDR programme provide incentives for ex-combatants to participate in pros- ecutions processes or truth-seeking initiatives? \n Will there be any screening on human rights criteria of those ex-combatants interested in staying in or joining the security forces? \n How can the DDR programme support or coordinate with other initiatives that address justice for women and justice for children? \n Can any information gathered during the DDR programme be shared with a truth com- mission or prosecutions process? \n How do the benefits offered to ex-combatants in the DDR programme compare to any reparations offered to victims of the armed conflict? \n Can the benefits provided to ex-combatants be considered in light of reparations offered to victims? Is coordination between these two mechanisms possible? \n Are there opportunities to connect the reintegration programme with locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? For example, can any benefits provided to the community include support for locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Can the reintegration programme include a component that involves ex-combatants in efforts to rebuild communities that have been physically destroyed as a result of the armed conflict? \n Does the monitoring and assessment of the DDR programme include assessment of the impact of the programme on human rights, justice, and rule of law?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207397,7 +207397,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3206, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to possibilities for coordination \\n Will the planned timetable for the DDR programme overlap with planned transitional justice measures? \\n Are there opportunities to coordinate information strategies around DDR and transi- tional justice measures? \\n Will ex-combatants be screened on human rights criteria as part of the DDR programme? Can the DDR programme integrate human rights education and\/or information ses- sions that specifically provide information on transitional justice? \\n Can the DDR programme provide incentives for ex-combatants to participate in pros- ecutions processes or truth-seeking initiatives? \\n Will there be any screening on human rights criteria of those ex-combatants interested in staying in or joining the security forces? \\n How can the DDR programme support or coordinate with other initiatives that address justice for women and justice for children? \\n Can any information gathered during the DDR programme be shared with a truth com- mission or prosecutions process? \\n How do the benefits offered to ex-combatants in the DDR programme compare to any reparations offered to victims of the armed conflict? \\n Can the benefits provided to ex-combatants be considered in light of reparations offered to victims? Is coordination between these two mechanisms possible? \\n Are there opportunities to connect the reintegration programme with locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? For example, can any benefits provided to the community include support for locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Can the reintegration programme include a component that involves ex-combatants in efforts to rebuild communities that have been physically destroyed as a result of the armed conflict? \\n Does the monitoring and assessment of the DDR programme include assessment of the impact of the programme on human rights, justice, and rule of law?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to possibilities for coordination \n Will the planned timetable for the DDR programme overlap with planned transitional justice measures? \n Are there opportunities to coordinate information strategies around DDR and transi- tional justice measures? \n Will ex-combatants be screened on human rights criteria as part of the DDR programme? Can the DDR programme integrate human rights education and\/or information ses- sions that specifically provide information on transitional justice? \n Can the DDR programme provide incentives for ex-combatants to participate in pros- ecutions processes or truth-seeking initiatives? \n Will there be any screening on human rights criteria of those ex-combatants interested in staying in or joining the security forces? \n How can the DDR programme support or coordinate with other initiatives that address justice for women and justice for children? \n Can any information gathered during the DDR programme be shared with a truth com- mission or prosecutions process? \n How do the benefits offered to ex-combatants in the DDR programme compare to any reparations offered to victims of the armed conflict? \n Can the benefits provided to ex-combatants be considered in light of reparations offered to victims? Is coordination between these two mechanisms possible? \n Are there opportunities to connect the reintegration programme with locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? For example, can any benefits provided to the community include support for locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Can the reintegration programme include a component that involves ex-combatants in efforts to rebuild communities that have been physically destroyed as a result of the armed conflict? \n Does the monitoring and assessment of the DDR programme include assessment of the impact of the programme on human rights, justice, and rule of law?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207408,14 +207408,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Can the DDR programme provide incentives for ex-combatants to participate in pros- ecutions processes or truth-seeking initiatives?", + "Sentence": "\n Can the DDR programme provide incentives for ex-combatants to participate in pros- ecutions processes or truth-seeking initiatives?", "newParagraph": "question related possibility coordination n planned timetable ddr programme overlap planned transitional justice measure n opportunity coordinate information strategy around ddr transi tional justice measure n excombatants screened human right criterion part ddr programme ddr programme integrate human right education andor information s sion specifically provide information transitional justice n ddr programme provide incentive excombatants participate pro ecutions process truthseeking initiative n screening human right criterion excombatants interested staying joining security force n ddr programme support coordinate initiative address justice woman justice child n information gathered ddr programme shared truth com mission prosecution process n benefit offered excombatants ddr programme compare reparation offered victim armed conflict n benefit provided excombatants considered light reparation offered victim coordination two mechanism possible n opportunity connect reintegration programme locally based justice reconciliation initiative example benefit provided community include support locally based justice reconciliation initiative n reintegration programme include component involves excombatants effort rebuild community physically destroyed result armed conflict n monitoring assessment ddr programme include assessment impact programme human right justice rule law", "ProcessedSent": "n ddr programme provide incentive excombatants participate pro ecutions process truthseeking initiative", "SentID": 11522 }, { "ParagraphID": 3206, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to possibilities for coordination \\n Will the planned timetable for the DDR programme overlap with planned transitional justice measures? \\n Are there opportunities to coordinate information strategies around DDR and transi- tional justice measures? \\n Will ex-combatants be screened on human rights criteria as part of the DDR programme? Can the DDR programme integrate human rights education and\/or information ses- sions that specifically provide information on transitional justice? \\n Can the DDR programme provide incentives for ex-combatants to participate in pros- ecutions processes or truth-seeking initiatives? \\n Will there be any screening on human rights criteria of those ex-combatants interested in staying in or joining the security forces? \\n How can the DDR programme support or coordinate with other initiatives that address justice for women and justice for children? \\n Can any information gathered during the DDR programme be shared with a truth com- mission or prosecutions process? \\n How do the benefits offered to ex-combatants in the DDR programme compare to any reparations offered to victims of the armed conflict? \\n Can the benefits provided to ex-combatants be considered in light of reparations offered to victims? Is coordination between these two mechanisms possible? \\n Are there opportunities to connect the reintegration programme with locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? For example, can any benefits provided to the community include support for locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Can the reintegration programme include a component that involves ex-combatants in efforts to rebuild communities that have been physically destroyed as a result of the armed conflict? \\n Does the monitoring and assessment of the DDR programme include assessment of the impact of the programme on human rights, justice, and rule of law?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to possibilities for coordination \n Will the planned timetable for the DDR programme overlap with planned transitional justice measures? \n Are there opportunities to coordinate information strategies around DDR and transi- tional justice measures? \n Will ex-combatants be screened on human rights criteria as part of the DDR programme? Can the DDR programme integrate human rights education and\/or information ses- sions that specifically provide information on transitional justice? \n Can the DDR programme provide incentives for ex-combatants to participate in pros- ecutions processes or truth-seeking initiatives? \n Will there be any screening on human rights criteria of those ex-combatants interested in staying in or joining the security forces? \n How can the DDR programme support or coordinate with other initiatives that address justice for women and justice for children? \n Can any information gathered during the DDR programme be shared with a truth com- mission or prosecutions process? \n How do the benefits offered to ex-combatants in the DDR programme compare to any reparations offered to victims of the armed conflict? \n Can the benefits provided to ex-combatants be considered in light of reparations offered to victims? Is coordination between these two mechanisms possible? \n Are there opportunities to connect the reintegration programme with locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? For example, can any benefits provided to the community include support for locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Can the reintegration programme include a component that involves ex-combatants in efforts to rebuild communities that have been physically destroyed as a result of the armed conflict? \n Does the monitoring and assessment of the DDR programme include assessment of the impact of the programme on human rights, justice, and rule of law?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207426,14 +207426,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Will there be any screening on human rights criteria of those ex-combatants interested in staying in or joining the security forces?", + "Sentence": "\n Will there be any screening on human rights criteria of those ex-combatants interested in staying in or joining the security forces?", "newParagraph": "question related possibility coordination n planned timetable ddr programme overlap planned transitional justice measure n opportunity coordinate information strategy around ddr transi tional justice measure n excombatants screened human right criterion part ddr programme ddr programme integrate human right education andor information s sion specifically provide information transitional justice n ddr programme provide incentive excombatants participate pro ecutions process truthseeking initiative n screening human right criterion excombatants interested staying joining security force n ddr programme support coordinate initiative address justice woman justice child n information gathered ddr programme shared truth com mission prosecution process n benefit offered excombatants ddr programme compare reparation offered victim armed conflict n benefit provided excombatants considered light reparation offered victim coordination two mechanism possible n opportunity connect reintegration programme locally based justice reconciliation initiative example benefit provided community include support locally based justice reconciliation initiative n reintegration programme include component involves excombatants effort rebuild community physically destroyed result armed conflict n monitoring assessment ddr programme include assessment impact programme human right justice rule law", "ProcessedSent": "n screening human right criterion excombatants interested staying joining security force", "SentID": 11523 }, { "ParagraphID": 3206, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to possibilities for coordination \\n Will the planned timetable for the DDR programme overlap with planned transitional justice measures? \\n Are there opportunities to coordinate information strategies around DDR and transi- tional justice measures? \\n Will ex-combatants be screened on human rights criteria as part of the DDR programme? Can the DDR programme integrate human rights education and\/or information ses- sions that specifically provide information on transitional justice? \\n Can the DDR programme provide incentives for ex-combatants to participate in pros- ecutions processes or truth-seeking initiatives? \\n Will there be any screening on human rights criteria of those ex-combatants interested in staying in or joining the security forces? \\n How can the DDR programme support or coordinate with other initiatives that address justice for women and justice for children? \\n Can any information gathered during the DDR programme be shared with a truth com- mission or prosecutions process? \\n How do the benefits offered to ex-combatants in the DDR programme compare to any reparations offered to victims of the armed conflict? \\n Can the benefits provided to ex-combatants be considered in light of reparations offered to victims? Is coordination between these two mechanisms possible? \\n Are there opportunities to connect the reintegration programme with locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? For example, can any benefits provided to the community include support for locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Can the reintegration programme include a component that involves ex-combatants in efforts to rebuild communities that have been physically destroyed as a result of the armed conflict? \\n Does the monitoring and assessment of the DDR programme include assessment of the impact of the programme on human rights, justice, and rule of law?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to possibilities for coordination \n Will the planned timetable for the DDR programme overlap with planned transitional justice measures? \n Are there opportunities to coordinate information strategies around DDR and transi- tional justice measures? \n Will ex-combatants be screened on human rights criteria as part of the DDR programme? Can the DDR programme integrate human rights education and\/or information ses- sions that specifically provide information on transitional justice? \n Can the DDR programme provide incentives for ex-combatants to participate in pros- ecutions processes or truth-seeking initiatives? \n Will there be any screening on human rights criteria of those ex-combatants interested in staying in or joining the security forces? \n How can the DDR programme support or coordinate with other initiatives that address justice for women and justice for children? \n Can any information gathered during the DDR programme be shared with a truth com- mission or prosecutions process? \n How do the benefits offered to ex-combatants in the DDR programme compare to any reparations offered to victims of the armed conflict? \n Can the benefits provided to ex-combatants be considered in light of reparations offered to victims? Is coordination between these two mechanisms possible? \n Are there opportunities to connect the reintegration programme with locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? For example, can any benefits provided to the community include support for locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Can the reintegration programme include a component that involves ex-combatants in efforts to rebuild communities that have been physically destroyed as a result of the armed conflict? \n Does the monitoring and assessment of the DDR programme include assessment of the impact of the programme on human rights, justice, and rule of law?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207444,14 +207444,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n How can the DDR programme support or coordinate with other initiatives that address justice for women and justice for children?", + "Sentence": "\n How can the DDR programme support or coordinate with other initiatives that address justice for women and justice for children?", "newParagraph": "question related possibility coordination n planned timetable ddr programme overlap planned transitional justice measure n opportunity coordinate information strategy around ddr transi tional justice measure n excombatants screened human right criterion part ddr programme ddr programme integrate human right education andor information s sion specifically provide information transitional justice n ddr programme provide incentive excombatants participate pro ecutions process truthseeking initiative n screening human right criterion excombatants interested staying joining security force n ddr programme support coordinate initiative address justice woman justice child n information gathered ddr programme shared truth com mission prosecution process n benefit offered excombatants ddr programme compare reparation offered victim armed conflict n benefit provided excombatants considered light reparation offered victim coordination two mechanism possible n opportunity connect reintegration programme locally based justice reconciliation initiative example benefit provided community include support locally based justice reconciliation initiative n reintegration programme include component involves excombatants effort rebuild community physically destroyed result armed conflict n monitoring assessment ddr programme include assessment impact programme human right justice rule law", "ProcessedSent": "n ddr programme support coordinate initiative address justice woman justice child", "SentID": 11524 }, { "ParagraphID": 3206, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to possibilities for coordination \\n Will the planned timetable for the DDR programme overlap with planned transitional justice measures? \\n Are there opportunities to coordinate information strategies around DDR and transi- tional justice measures? \\n Will ex-combatants be screened on human rights criteria as part of the DDR programme? Can the DDR programme integrate human rights education and\/or information ses- sions that specifically provide information on transitional justice? \\n Can the DDR programme provide incentives for ex-combatants to participate in pros- ecutions processes or truth-seeking initiatives? \\n Will there be any screening on human rights criteria of those ex-combatants interested in staying in or joining the security forces? \\n How can the DDR programme support or coordinate with other initiatives that address justice for women and justice for children? \\n Can any information gathered during the DDR programme be shared with a truth com- mission or prosecutions process? \\n How do the benefits offered to ex-combatants in the DDR programme compare to any reparations offered to victims of the armed conflict? \\n Can the benefits provided to ex-combatants be considered in light of reparations offered to victims? Is coordination between these two mechanisms possible? \\n Are there opportunities to connect the reintegration programme with locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? For example, can any benefits provided to the community include support for locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Can the reintegration programme include a component that involves ex-combatants in efforts to rebuild communities that have been physically destroyed as a result of the armed conflict? \\n Does the monitoring and assessment of the DDR programme include assessment of the impact of the programme on human rights, justice, and rule of law?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to possibilities for coordination \n Will the planned timetable for the DDR programme overlap with planned transitional justice measures? \n Are there opportunities to coordinate information strategies around DDR and transi- tional justice measures? \n Will ex-combatants be screened on human rights criteria as part of the DDR programme? Can the DDR programme integrate human rights education and\/or information ses- sions that specifically provide information on transitional justice? \n Can the DDR programme provide incentives for ex-combatants to participate in pros- ecutions processes or truth-seeking initiatives? \n Will there be any screening on human rights criteria of those ex-combatants interested in staying in or joining the security forces? \n How can the DDR programme support or coordinate with other initiatives that address justice for women and justice for children? \n Can any information gathered during the DDR programme be shared with a truth com- mission or prosecutions process? \n How do the benefits offered to ex-combatants in the DDR programme compare to any reparations offered to victims of the armed conflict? \n Can the benefits provided to ex-combatants be considered in light of reparations offered to victims? Is coordination between these two mechanisms possible? \n Are there opportunities to connect the reintegration programme with locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? For example, can any benefits provided to the community include support for locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Can the reintegration programme include a component that involves ex-combatants in efforts to rebuild communities that have been physically destroyed as a result of the armed conflict? \n Does the monitoring and assessment of the DDR programme include assessment of the impact of the programme on human rights, justice, and rule of law?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207462,14 +207462,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Can any information gathered during the DDR programme be shared with a truth com- mission or prosecutions process?", + "Sentence": "\n Can any information gathered during the DDR programme be shared with a truth com- mission or prosecutions process?", "newParagraph": "question related possibility coordination n planned timetable ddr programme overlap planned transitional justice measure n opportunity coordinate information strategy around ddr transi tional justice measure n excombatants screened human right criterion part ddr programme ddr programme integrate human right education andor information s sion specifically provide information transitional justice n ddr programme provide incentive excombatants participate pro ecutions process truthseeking initiative n screening human right criterion excombatants interested staying joining security force n ddr programme support coordinate initiative address justice woman justice child n information gathered ddr programme shared truth com mission prosecution process n benefit offered excombatants ddr programme compare reparation offered victim armed conflict n benefit provided excombatants considered light reparation offered victim coordination two mechanism possible n opportunity connect reintegration programme locally based justice reconciliation initiative example benefit provided community include support locally based justice reconciliation initiative n reintegration programme include component involves excombatants effort rebuild community physically destroyed result armed conflict n monitoring assessment ddr programme include assessment impact programme human right justice rule law", "ProcessedSent": "n information gathered ddr programme shared truth com mission prosecution process", "SentID": 11525 }, { "ParagraphID": 3206, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to possibilities for coordination \\n Will the planned timetable for the DDR programme overlap with planned transitional justice measures? \\n Are there opportunities to coordinate information strategies around DDR and transi- tional justice measures? \\n Will ex-combatants be screened on human rights criteria as part of the DDR programme? Can the DDR programme integrate human rights education and\/or information ses- sions that specifically provide information on transitional justice? \\n Can the DDR programme provide incentives for ex-combatants to participate in pros- ecutions processes or truth-seeking initiatives? \\n Will there be any screening on human rights criteria of those ex-combatants interested in staying in or joining the security forces? \\n How can the DDR programme support or coordinate with other initiatives that address justice for women and justice for children? \\n Can any information gathered during the DDR programme be shared with a truth com- mission or prosecutions process? \\n How do the benefits offered to ex-combatants in the DDR programme compare to any reparations offered to victims of the armed conflict? \\n Can the benefits provided to ex-combatants be considered in light of reparations offered to victims? Is coordination between these two mechanisms possible? \\n Are there opportunities to connect the reintegration programme with locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? For example, can any benefits provided to the community include support for locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Can the reintegration programme include a component that involves ex-combatants in efforts to rebuild communities that have been physically destroyed as a result of the armed conflict? \\n Does the monitoring and assessment of the DDR programme include assessment of the impact of the programme on human rights, justice, and rule of law?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to possibilities for coordination \n Will the planned timetable for the DDR programme overlap with planned transitional justice measures? \n Are there opportunities to coordinate information strategies around DDR and transi- tional justice measures? \n Will ex-combatants be screened on human rights criteria as part of the DDR programme? Can the DDR programme integrate human rights education and\/or information ses- sions that specifically provide information on transitional justice? \n Can the DDR programme provide incentives for ex-combatants to participate in pros- ecutions processes or truth-seeking initiatives? \n Will there be any screening on human rights criteria of those ex-combatants interested in staying in or joining the security forces? \n How can the DDR programme support or coordinate with other initiatives that address justice for women and justice for children? \n Can any information gathered during the DDR programme be shared with a truth com- mission or prosecutions process? \n How do the benefits offered to ex-combatants in the DDR programme compare to any reparations offered to victims of the armed conflict? \n Can the benefits provided to ex-combatants be considered in light of reparations offered to victims? Is coordination between these two mechanisms possible? \n Are there opportunities to connect the reintegration programme with locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? For example, can any benefits provided to the community include support for locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Can the reintegration programme include a component that involves ex-combatants in efforts to rebuild communities that have been physically destroyed as a result of the armed conflict? \n Does the monitoring and assessment of the DDR programme include assessment of the impact of the programme on human rights, justice, and rule of law?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207480,14 +207480,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n How do the benefits offered to ex-combatants in the DDR programme compare to any reparations offered to victims of the armed conflict?", + "Sentence": "\n How do the benefits offered to ex-combatants in the DDR programme compare to any reparations offered to victims of the armed conflict?", "newParagraph": "question related possibility coordination n planned timetable ddr programme overlap planned transitional justice measure n opportunity coordinate information strategy around ddr transi tional justice measure n excombatants screened human right criterion part ddr programme ddr programme integrate human right education andor information s sion specifically provide information transitional justice n ddr programme provide incentive excombatants participate pro ecutions process truthseeking initiative n screening human right criterion excombatants interested staying joining security force n ddr programme support coordinate initiative address justice woman justice child n information gathered ddr programme shared truth com mission prosecution process n benefit offered excombatants ddr programme compare reparation offered victim armed conflict n benefit provided excombatants considered light reparation offered victim coordination two mechanism possible n opportunity connect reintegration programme locally based justice reconciliation initiative example benefit provided community include support locally based justice reconciliation initiative n reintegration programme include component involves excombatants effort rebuild community physically destroyed result armed conflict n monitoring assessment ddr programme include assessment impact programme human right justice rule law", "ProcessedSent": "n benefit offered excombatants ddr programme compare reparation offered victim armed conflict", "SentID": 11526 }, { "ParagraphID": 3206, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to possibilities for coordination \\n Will the planned timetable for the DDR programme overlap with planned transitional justice measures? \\n Are there opportunities to coordinate information strategies around DDR and transi- tional justice measures? \\n Will ex-combatants be screened on human rights criteria as part of the DDR programme? Can the DDR programme integrate human rights education and\/or information ses- sions that specifically provide information on transitional justice? \\n Can the DDR programme provide incentives for ex-combatants to participate in pros- ecutions processes or truth-seeking initiatives? \\n Will there be any screening on human rights criteria of those ex-combatants interested in staying in or joining the security forces? \\n How can the DDR programme support or coordinate with other initiatives that address justice for women and justice for children? \\n Can any information gathered during the DDR programme be shared with a truth com- mission or prosecutions process? \\n How do the benefits offered to ex-combatants in the DDR programme compare to any reparations offered to victims of the armed conflict? \\n Can the benefits provided to ex-combatants be considered in light of reparations offered to victims? Is coordination between these two mechanisms possible? \\n Are there opportunities to connect the reintegration programme with locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? For example, can any benefits provided to the community include support for locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Can the reintegration programme include a component that involves ex-combatants in efforts to rebuild communities that have been physically destroyed as a result of the armed conflict? \\n Does the monitoring and assessment of the DDR programme include assessment of the impact of the programme on human rights, justice, and rule of law?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to possibilities for coordination \n Will the planned timetable for the DDR programme overlap with planned transitional justice measures? \n Are there opportunities to coordinate information strategies around DDR and transi- tional justice measures? \n Will ex-combatants be screened on human rights criteria as part of the DDR programme? Can the DDR programme integrate human rights education and\/or information ses- sions that specifically provide information on transitional justice? \n Can the DDR programme provide incentives for ex-combatants to participate in pros- ecutions processes or truth-seeking initiatives? \n Will there be any screening on human rights criteria of those ex-combatants interested in staying in or joining the security forces? \n How can the DDR programme support or coordinate with other initiatives that address justice for women and justice for children? \n Can any information gathered during the DDR programme be shared with a truth com- mission or prosecutions process? \n How do the benefits offered to ex-combatants in the DDR programme compare to any reparations offered to victims of the armed conflict? \n Can the benefits provided to ex-combatants be considered in light of reparations offered to victims? Is coordination between these two mechanisms possible? \n Are there opportunities to connect the reintegration programme with locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? For example, can any benefits provided to the community include support for locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Can the reintegration programme include a component that involves ex-combatants in efforts to rebuild communities that have been physically destroyed as a result of the armed conflict? \n Does the monitoring and assessment of the DDR programme include assessment of the impact of the programme on human rights, justice, and rule of law?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207498,14 +207498,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Can the benefits provided to ex-combatants be considered in light of reparations offered to victims?", + "Sentence": "\n Can the benefits provided to ex-combatants be considered in light of reparations offered to victims?", "newParagraph": "question related possibility coordination n planned timetable ddr programme overlap planned transitional justice measure n opportunity coordinate information strategy around ddr transi tional justice measure n excombatants screened human right criterion part ddr programme ddr programme integrate human right education andor information s sion specifically provide information transitional justice n ddr programme provide incentive excombatants participate pro ecutions process truthseeking initiative n screening human right criterion excombatants interested staying joining security force n ddr programme support coordinate initiative address justice woman justice child n information gathered ddr programme shared truth com mission prosecution process n benefit offered excombatants ddr programme compare reparation offered victim armed conflict n benefit provided excombatants considered light reparation offered victim coordination two mechanism possible n opportunity connect reintegration programme locally based justice reconciliation initiative example benefit provided community include support locally based justice reconciliation initiative n reintegration programme include component involves excombatants effort rebuild community physically destroyed result armed conflict n monitoring assessment ddr programme include assessment impact programme human right justice rule law", "ProcessedSent": "n benefit provided excombatants considered light reparation offered victim", "SentID": 11527 }, { "ParagraphID": 3206, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to possibilities for coordination \\n Will the planned timetable for the DDR programme overlap with planned transitional justice measures? \\n Are there opportunities to coordinate information strategies around DDR and transi- tional justice measures? \\n Will ex-combatants be screened on human rights criteria as part of the DDR programme? Can the DDR programme integrate human rights education and\/or information ses- sions that specifically provide information on transitional justice? \\n Can the DDR programme provide incentives for ex-combatants to participate in pros- ecutions processes or truth-seeking initiatives? \\n Will there be any screening on human rights criteria of those ex-combatants interested in staying in or joining the security forces? \\n How can the DDR programme support or coordinate with other initiatives that address justice for women and justice for children? \\n Can any information gathered during the DDR programme be shared with a truth com- mission or prosecutions process? \\n How do the benefits offered to ex-combatants in the DDR programme compare to any reparations offered to victims of the armed conflict? \\n Can the benefits provided to ex-combatants be considered in light of reparations offered to victims? Is coordination between these two mechanisms possible? \\n Are there opportunities to connect the reintegration programme with locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? For example, can any benefits provided to the community include support for locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Can the reintegration programme include a component that involves ex-combatants in efforts to rebuild communities that have been physically destroyed as a result of the armed conflict? \\n Does the monitoring and assessment of the DDR programme include assessment of the impact of the programme on human rights, justice, and rule of law?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to possibilities for coordination \n Will the planned timetable for the DDR programme overlap with planned transitional justice measures? \n Are there opportunities to coordinate information strategies around DDR and transi- tional justice measures? \n Will ex-combatants be screened on human rights criteria as part of the DDR programme? Can the DDR programme integrate human rights education and\/or information ses- sions that specifically provide information on transitional justice? \n Can the DDR programme provide incentives for ex-combatants to participate in pros- ecutions processes or truth-seeking initiatives? \n Will there be any screening on human rights criteria of those ex-combatants interested in staying in or joining the security forces? \n How can the DDR programme support or coordinate with other initiatives that address justice for women and justice for children? \n Can any information gathered during the DDR programme be shared with a truth com- mission or prosecutions process? \n How do the benefits offered to ex-combatants in the DDR programme compare to any reparations offered to victims of the armed conflict? \n Can the benefits provided to ex-combatants be considered in light of reparations offered to victims? Is coordination between these two mechanisms possible? \n Are there opportunities to connect the reintegration programme with locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? For example, can any benefits provided to the community include support for locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Can the reintegration programme include a component that involves ex-combatants in efforts to rebuild communities that have been physically destroyed as a result of the armed conflict? \n Does the monitoring and assessment of the DDR programme include assessment of the impact of the programme on human rights, justice, and rule of law?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207523,7 +207523,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3206, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to possibilities for coordination \\n Will the planned timetable for the DDR programme overlap with planned transitional justice measures? \\n Are there opportunities to coordinate information strategies around DDR and transi- tional justice measures? \\n Will ex-combatants be screened on human rights criteria as part of the DDR programme? Can the DDR programme integrate human rights education and\/or information ses- sions that specifically provide information on transitional justice? \\n Can the DDR programme provide incentives for ex-combatants to participate in pros- ecutions processes or truth-seeking initiatives? \\n Will there be any screening on human rights criteria of those ex-combatants interested in staying in or joining the security forces? \\n How can the DDR programme support or coordinate with other initiatives that address justice for women and justice for children? \\n Can any information gathered during the DDR programme be shared with a truth com- mission or prosecutions process? \\n How do the benefits offered to ex-combatants in the DDR programme compare to any reparations offered to victims of the armed conflict? \\n Can the benefits provided to ex-combatants be considered in light of reparations offered to victims? Is coordination between these two mechanisms possible? \\n Are there opportunities to connect the reintegration programme with locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? For example, can any benefits provided to the community include support for locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Can the reintegration programme include a component that involves ex-combatants in efforts to rebuild communities that have been physically destroyed as a result of the armed conflict? \\n Does the monitoring and assessment of the DDR programme include assessment of the impact of the programme on human rights, justice, and rule of law?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to possibilities for coordination \n Will the planned timetable for the DDR programme overlap with planned transitional justice measures? \n Are there opportunities to coordinate information strategies around DDR and transi- tional justice measures? \n Will ex-combatants be screened on human rights criteria as part of the DDR programme? Can the DDR programme integrate human rights education and\/or information ses- sions that specifically provide information on transitional justice? \n Can the DDR programme provide incentives for ex-combatants to participate in pros- ecutions processes or truth-seeking initiatives? \n Will there be any screening on human rights criteria of those ex-combatants interested in staying in or joining the security forces? \n How can the DDR programme support or coordinate with other initiatives that address justice for women and justice for children? \n Can any information gathered during the DDR programme be shared with a truth com- mission or prosecutions process? \n How do the benefits offered to ex-combatants in the DDR programme compare to any reparations offered to victims of the armed conflict? \n Can the benefits provided to ex-combatants be considered in light of reparations offered to victims? Is coordination between these two mechanisms possible? \n Are there opportunities to connect the reintegration programme with locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? For example, can any benefits provided to the community include support for locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Can the reintegration programme include a component that involves ex-combatants in efforts to rebuild communities that have been physically destroyed as a result of the armed conflict? \n Does the monitoring and assessment of the DDR programme include assessment of the impact of the programme on human rights, justice, and rule of law?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207534,14 +207534,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Are there opportunities to connect the reintegration programme with locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives?", + "Sentence": "\n Are there opportunities to connect the reintegration programme with locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives?", "newParagraph": "question related possibility coordination n planned timetable ddr programme overlap planned transitional justice measure n opportunity coordinate information strategy around ddr transi tional justice measure n excombatants screened human right criterion part ddr programme ddr programme integrate human right education andor information s sion specifically provide information transitional justice n ddr programme provide incentive excombatants participate pro ecutions process truthseeking initiative n screening human right criterion excombatants interested staying joining security force n ddr programme support coordinate initiative address justice woman justice child n information gathered ddr programme shared truth com mission prosecution process n benefit offered excombatants ddr programme compare reparation offered victim armed conflict n benefit provided excombatants considered light reparation offered victim coordination two mechanism possible n opportunity connect reintegration programme locally based justice reconciliation initiative example benefit provided community include support locally based justice reconciliation initiative n reintegration programme include component involves excombatants effort rebuild community physically destroyed result armed conflict n monitoring assessment ddr programme include assessment impact programme human right justice rule law", "ProcessedSent": "n opportunity connect reintegration programme locally based justice reconciliation initiative", "SentID": 11529 }, { "ParagraphID": 3206, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to possibilities for coordination \\n Will the planned timetable for the DDR programme overlap with planned transitional justice measures? \\n Are there opportunities to coordinate information strategies around DDR and transi- tional justice measures? \\n Will ex-combatants be screened on human rights criteria as part of the DDR programme? Can the DDR programme integrate human rights education and\/or information ses- sions that specifically provide information on transitional justice? \\n Can the DDR programme provide incentives for ex-combatants to participate in pros- ecutions processes or truth-seeking initiatives? \\n Will there be any screening on human rights criteria of those ex-combatants interested in staying in or joining the security forces? \\n How can the DDR programme support or coordinate with other initiatives that address justice for women and justice for children? \\n Can any information gathered during the DDR programme be shared with a truth com- mission or prosecutions process? \\n How do the benefits offered to ex-combatants in the DDR programme compare to any reparations offered to victims of the armed conflict? \\n Can the benefits provided to ex-combatants be considered in light of reparations offered to victims? Is coordination between these two mechanisms possible? \\n Are there opportunities to connect the reintegration programme with locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? For example, can any benefits provided to the community include support for locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Can the reintegration programme include a component that involves ex-combatants in efforts to rebuild communities that have been physically destroyed as a result of the armed conflict? \\n Does the monitoring and assessment of the DDR programme include assessment of the impact of the programme on human rights, justice, and rule of law?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to possibilities for coordination \n Will the planned timetable for the DDR programme overlap with planned transitional justice measures? \n Are there opportunities to coordinate information strategies around DDR and transi- tional justice measures? \n Will ex-combatants be screened on human rights criteria as part of the DDR programme? Can the DDR programme integrate human rights education and\/or information ses- sions that specifically provide information on transitional justice? \n Can the DDR programme provide incentives for ex-combatants to participate in pros- ecutions processes or truth-seeking initiatives? \n Will there be any screening on human rights criteria of those ex-combatants interested in staying in or joining the security forces? \n How can the DDR programme support or coordinate with other initiatives that address justice for women and justice for children? \n Can any information gathered during the DDR programme be shared with a truth com- mission or prosecutions process? \n How do the benefits offered to ex-combatants in the DDR programme compare to any reparations offered to victims of the armed conflict? \n Can the benefits provided to ex-combatants be considered in light of reparations offered to victims? Is coordination between these two mechanisms possible? \n Are there opportunities to connect the reintegration programme with locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? For example, can any benefits provided to the community include support for locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Can the reintegration programme include a component that involves ex-combatants in efforts to rebuild communities that have been physically destroyed as a result of the armed conflict? \n Does the monitoring and assessment of the DDR programme include assessment of the impact of the programme on human rights, justice, and rule of law?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207559,7 +207559,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3206, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to possibilities for coordination \\n Will the planned timetable for the DDR programme overlap with planned transitional justice measures? \\n Are there opportunities to coordinate information strategies around DDR and transi- tional justice measures? \\n Will ex-combatants be screened on human rights criteria as part of the DDR programme? Can the DDR programme integrate human rights education and\/or information ses- sions that specifically provide information on transitional justice? \\n Can the DDR programme provide incentives for ex-combatants to participate in pros- ecutions processes or truth-seeking initiatives? \\n Will there be any screening on human rights criteria of those ex-combatants interested in staying in or joining the security forces? \\n How can the DDR programme support or coordinate with other initiatives that address justice for women and justice for children? \\n Can any information gathered during the DDR programme be shared with a truth com- mission or prosecutions process? \\n How do the benefits offered to ex-combatants in the DDR programme compare to any reparations offered to victims of the armed conflict? \\n Can the benefits provided to ex-combatants be considered in light of reparations offered to victims? Is coordination between these two mechanisms possible? \\n Are there opportunities to connect the reintegration programme with locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? For example, can any benefits provided to the community include support for locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Can the reintegration programme include a component that involves ex-combatants in efforts to rebuild communities that have been physically destroyed as a result of the armed conflict? \\n Does the monitoring and assessment of the DDR programme include assessment of the impact of the programme on human rights, justice, and rule of law?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to possibilities for coordination \n Will the planned timetable for the DDR programme overlap with planned transitional justice measures? \n Are there opportunities to coordinate information strategies around DDR and transi- tional justice measures? \n Will ex-combatants be screened on human rights criteria as part of the DDR programme? Can the DDR programme integrate human rights education and\/or information ses- sions that specifically provide information on transitional justice? \n Can the DDR programme provide incentives for ex-combatants to participate in pros- ecutions processes or truth-seeking initiatives? \n Will there be any screening on human rights criteria of those ex-combatants interested in staying in or joining the security forces? \n How can the DDR programme support or coordinate with other initiatives that address justice for women and justice for children? \n Can any information gathered during the DDR programme be shared with a truth com- mission or prosecutions process? \n How do the benefits offered to ex-combatants in the DDR programme compare to any reparations offered to victims of the armed conflict? \n Can the benefits provided to ex-combatants be considered in light of reparations offered to victims? Is coordination between these two mechanisms possible? \n Are there opportunities to connect the reintegration programme with locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? For example, can any benefits provided to the community include support for locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Can the reintegration programme include a component that involves ex-combatants in efforts to rebuild communities that have been physically destroyed as a result of the armed conflict? \n Does the monitoring and assessment of the DDR programme include assessment of the impact of the programme on human rights, justice, and rule of law?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207570,14 +207570,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Can the reintegration programme include a component that involves ex-combatants in efforts to rebuild communities that have been physically destroyed as a result of the armed conflict?", + "Sentence": "\n Can the reintegration programme include a component that involves ex-combatants in efforts to rebuild communities that have been physically destroyed as a result of the armed conflict?", "newParagraph": "question related possibility coordination n planned timetable ddr programme overlap planned transitional justice measure n opportunity coordinate information strategy around ddr transi tional justice measure n excombatants screened human right criterion part ddr programme ddr programme integrate human right education andor information s sion specifically provide information transitional justice n ddr programme provide incentive excombatants participate pro ecutions process truthseeking initiative n screening human right criterion excombatants interested staying joining security force n ddr programme support coordinate initiative address justice woman justice child n information gathered ddr programme shared truth com mission prosecution process n benefit offered excombatants ddr programme compare reparation offered victim armed conflict n benefit provided excombatants considered light reparation offered victim coordination two mechanism possible n opportunity connect reintegration programme locally based justice reconciliation initiative example benefit provided community include support locally based justice reconciliation initiative n reintegration programme include component involves excombatants effort rebuild community physically destroyed result armed conflict n monitoring assessment ddr programme include assessment impact programme human right justice rule law", "ProcessedSent": "n reintegration programme include component involves excombatants effort rebuild community physically destroyed result armed conflict", "SentID": 11531 }, { "ParagraphID": 3206, - "Paragraph": "Questions related to possibilities for coordination \\n Will the planned timetable for the DDR programme overlap with planned transitional justice measures? \\n Are there opportunities to coordinate information strategies around DDR and transi- tional justice measures? \\n Will ex-combatants be screened on human rights criteria as part of the DDR programme? Can the DDR programme integrate human rights education and\/or information ses- sions that specifically provide information on transitional justice? \\n Can the DDR programme provide incentives for ex-combatants to participate in pros- ecutions processes or truth-seeking initiatives? \\n Will there be any screening on human rights criteria of those ex-combatants interested in staying in or joining the security forces? \\n How can the DDR programme support or coordinate with other initiatives that address justice for women and justice for children? \\n Can any information gathered during the DDR programme be shared with a truth com- mission or prosecutions process? \\n How do the benefits offered to ex-combatants in the DDR programme compare to any reparations offered to victims of the armed conflict? \\n Can the benefits provided to ex-combatants be considered in light of reparations offered to victims? Is coordination between these two mechanisms possible? \\n Are there opportunities to connect the reintegration programme with locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? For example, can any benefits provided to the community include support for locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \\n Can the reintegration programme include a component that involves ex-combatants in efforts to rebuild communities that have been physically destroyed as a result of the armed conflict? \\n Does the monitoring and assessment of the DDR programme include assessment of the impact of the programme on human rights, justice, and rule of law?", + "Paragraph": "Questions related to possibilities for coordination \n Will the planned timetable for the DDR programme overlap with planned transitional justice measures? \n Are there opportunities to coordinate information strategies around DDR and transi- tional justice measures? \n Will ex-combatants be screened on human rights criteria as part of the DDR programme? Can the DDR programme integrate human rights education and\/or information ses- sions that specifically provide information on transitional justice? \n Can the DDR programme provide incentives for ex-combatants to participate in pros- ecutions processes or truth-seeking initiatives? \n Will there be any screening on human rights criteria of those ex-combatants interested in staying in or joining the security forces? \n How can the DDR programme support or coordinate with other initiatives that address justice for women and justice for children? \n Can any information gathered during the DDR programme be shared with a truth com- mission or prosecutions process? \n How do the benefits offered to ex-combatants in the DDR programme compare to any reparations offered to victims of the armed conflict? \n Can the benefits provided to ex-combatants be considered in light of reparations offered to victims? Is coordination between these two mechanisms possible? \n Are there opportunities to connect the reintegration programme with locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? For example, can any benefits provided to the community include support for locally based justice and reconciliation initiatives? \n Can the reintegration programme include a component that involves ex-combatants in efforts to rebuild communities that have been physically destroyed as a result of the armed conflict? \n Does the monitoring and assessment of the DDR programme include assessment of the impact of the programme on human rights, justice, and rule of law?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207588,14 +207588,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Does the monitoring and assessment of the DDR programme include assessment of the impact of the programme on human rights, justice, and rule of law?", + "Sentence": "\n Does the monitoring and assessment of the DDR programme include assessment of the impact of the programme on human rights, justice, and rule of law?", "newParagraph": "question related possibility coordination n planned timetable ddr programme overlap planned transitional justice measure n opportunity coordinate information strategy around ddr transi tional justice measure n excombatants screened human right criterion part ddr programme ddr programme integrate human right education andor information s sion specifically provide information transitional justice n ddr programme provide incentive excombatants participate pro ecutions process truthseeking initiative n screening human right criterion excombatants interested staying joining security force n ddr programme support coordinate initiative address justice woman justice child n information gathered ddr programme shared truth com mission prosecution process n benefit offered excombatants ddr programme compare reparation offered victim armed conflict n benefit provided excombatants considered light reparation offered victim coordination two mechanism possible n opportunity connect reintegration programme locally based justice reconciliation initiative example benefit provided community include support locally based justice reconciliation initiative n reintegration programme include component involves excombatants effort rebuild community physically destroyed result armed conflict n monitoring assessment ddr programme include assessment impact programme human right justice rule law", "ProcessedSent": "n monitoring assessment ddr programme include assessment impact programme human right justice rule law", "SentID": 11532 }, { "ParagraphID": 3207, - "Paragraph": "International Standards and Resolutions \\n Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (\u201cThe Beijing Rules\u201d), 29 November 1985, UN Doc. A\/RES\/40\/33. \\n Guidelines on Justice Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses, 22 July 2005, Resolution 2005\/20 see UN Doc. E\/2005\/INF\/2\/Add.1. \\n Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparations for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, 21 March 2006, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post- conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2002\/616. \\n \u2014, Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, 31 October 2000, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1325. \\n \u2014, Resolution 1820 on Sexual Violence, 19 June 2008, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1820. ", + "Paragraph": "International Standards and Resolutions \n Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (\u201cThe Beijing Rules\u201d), 29 November 1985, UN Doc. A\/RES\/40\/33. \n Guidelines on Justice Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses, 22 July 2005, Resolution 2005\/20 see UN Doc. E\/2005\/INF\/2\/Add.1. \n Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparations for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, 21 March 2006, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post- conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2002\/616. \n \u2014, Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, 31 October 2000, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1325. \n \u2014, Resolution 1820 on Sexual Violence, 19 June 2008, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1820. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207606,14 +207606,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "International Standards and Resolutions \\n Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity, 8 February 2005, UN Doc.", + "Sentence": "International Standards and Resolutions \n Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity, 8 February 2005, UN Doc.", "newParagraph": "international standard resolution n updated set principle protection promotion human right action combat impunity 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102add1 n united nation standard minimum rule administration juvenile justice beijing rule 29 november 1985 un doc ares4033 n guideline justice matter involving child victim witness 22 july 2005 resolution 200520 see un doc e2005inf2add1 n basic principle guideline right remedy reparation victim gross violation international human right law international humanitarian law 21 march 2006 un doc ares60147 n report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict post conflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2002616 n resolution 1325 woman peace security 31 october 2000 un doc sres1325 n resolution 1820 sexual violence 19 june 2008 un doc sres1820 ", "ProcessedSent": "international standard resolution n updated set principle protection promotion human right action combat impunity 8 february 2005 un doc", "SentID": 11533 }, { "ParagraphID": 3207, - "Paragraph": "International Standards and Resolutions \\n Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (\u201cThe Beijing Rules\u201d), 29 November 1985, UN Doc. A\/RES\/40\/33. \\n Guidelines on Justice Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses, 22 July 2005, Resolution 2005\/20 see UN Doc. E\/2005\/INF\/2\/Add.1. \\n Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparations for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, 21 March 2006, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post- conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2002\/616. \\n \u2014, Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, 31 October 2000, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1325. \\n \u2014, Resolution 1820 on Sexual Violence, 19 June 2008, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1820. ", + "Paragraph": "International Standards and Resolutions \n Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (\u201cThe Beijing Rules\u201d), 29 November 1985, UN Doc. A\/RES\/40\/33. \n Guidelines on Justice Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses, 22 July 2005, Resolution 2005\/20 see UN Doc. E\/2005\/INF\/2\/Add.1. \n Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparations for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, 21 March 2006, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post- conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2002\/616. \n \u2014, Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, 31 October 2000, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1325. \n \u2014, Resolution 1820 on Sexual Violence, 19 June 2008, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1820. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207631,7 +207631,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3207, - "Paragraph": "International Standards and Resolutions \\n Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (\u201cThe Beijing Rules\u201d), 29 November 1985, UN Doc. A\/RES\/40\/33. \\n Guidelines on Justice Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses, 22 July 2005, Resolution 2005\/20 see UN Doc. E\/2005\/INF\/2\/Add.1. \\n Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparations for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, 21 March 2006, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post- conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2002\/616. \\n \u2014, Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, 31 October 2000, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1325. \\n \u2014, Resolution 1820 on Sexual Violence, 19 June 2008, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1820. ", + "Paragraph": "International Standards and Resolutions \n Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (\u201cThe Beijing Rules\u201d), 29 November 1985, UN Doc. A\/RES\/40\/33. \n Guidelines on Justice Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses, 22 July 2005, Resolution 2005\/20 see UN Doc. E\/2005\/INF\/2\/Add.1. \n Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparations for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, 21 March 2006, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post- conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2002\/616. \n \u2014, Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, 31 October 2000, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1325. \n \u2014, Resolution 1820 on Sexual Violence, 19 June 2008, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1820. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207642,14 +207642,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (\u201cThe Beijing Rules\u201d), 29 November 1985, UN Doc.", + "Sentence": "\n United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (\u201cThe Beijing Rules\u201d), 29 November 1985, UN Doc.", "newParagraph": "international standard resolution n updated set principle protection promotion human right action combat impunity 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102add1 n united nation standard minimum rule administration juvenile justice beijing rule 29 november 1985 un doc ares4033 n guideline justice matter involving child victim witness 22 july 2005 resolution 200520 see un doc e2005inf2add1 n basic principle guideline right remedy reparation victim gross violation international human right law international humanitarian law 21 march 2006 un doc ares60147 n report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict post conflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2002616 n resolution 1325 woman peace security 31 october 2000 un doc sres1325 n resolution 1820 sexual violence 19 june 2008 un doc sres1820 ", "ProcessedSent": "n united nation standard minimum rule administration juvenile justice beijing rule 29 november 1985 un doc", "SentID": 11535 }, { "ParagraphID": 3207, - "Paragraph": "International Standards and Resolutions \\n Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (\u201cThe Beijing Rules\u201d), 29 November 1985, UN Doc. A\/RES\/40\/33. \\n Guidelines on Justice Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses, 22 July 2005, Resolution 2005\/20 see UN Doc. E\/2005\/INF\/2\/Add.1. \\n Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparations for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, 21 March 2006, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post- conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2002\/616. \\n \u2014, Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, 31 October 2000, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1325. \\n \u2014, Resolution 1820 on Sexual Violence, 19 June 2008, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1820. ", + "Paragraph": "International Standards and Resolutions \n Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (\u201cThe Beijing Rules\u201d), 29 November 1985, UN Doc. A\/RES\/40\/33. \n Guidelines on Justice Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses, 22 July 2005, Resolution 2005\/20 see UN Doc. E\/2005\/INF\/2\/Add.1. \n Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparations for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, 21 March 2006, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post- conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2002\/616. \n \u2014, Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, 31 October 2000, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1325. \n \u2014, Resolution 1820 on Sexual Violence, 19 June 2008, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1820. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207667,7 +207667,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3207, - "Paragraph": "International Standards and Resolutions \\n Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (\u201cThe Beijing Rules\u201d), 29 November 1985, UN Doc. A\/RES\/40\/33. \\n Guidelines on Justice Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses, 22 July 2005, Resolution 2005\/20 see UN Doc. E\/2005\/INF\/2\/Add.1. \\n Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparations for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, 21 March 2006, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post- conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2002\/616. \\n \u2014, Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, 31 October 2000, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1325. \\n \u2014, Resolution 1820 on Sexual Violence, 19 June 2008, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1820. ", + "Paragraph": "International Standards and Resolutions \n Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (\u201cThe Beijing Rules\u201d), 29 November 1985, UN Doc. A\/RES\/40\/33. \n Guidelines on Justice Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses, 22 July 2005, Resolution 2005\/20 see UN Doc. E\/2005\/INF\/2\/Add.1. \n Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparations for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, 21 March 2006, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post- conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2002\/616. \n \u2014, Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, 31 October 2000, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1325. \n \u2014, Resolution 1820 on Sexual Violence, 19 June 2008, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1820. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207678,14 +207678,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Guidelines on Justice Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses, 22 July 2005, Resolution 2005\/20 see UN Doc.", + "Sentence": "\n Guidelines on Justice Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses, 22 July 2005, Resolution 2005\/20 see UN Doc.", "newParagraph": "international standard resolution n updated set principle protection promotion human right action combat impunity 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102add1 n united nation standard minimum rule administration juvenile justice beijing rule 29 november 1985 un doc ares4033 n guideline justice matter involving child victim witness 22 july 2005 resolution 200520 see un doc e2005inf2add1 n basic principle guideline right remedy reparation victim gross violation international human right law international humanitarian law 21 march 2006 un doc ares60147 n report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict post conflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2002616 n resolution 1325 woman peace security 31 october 2000 un doc sres1325 n resolution 1820 sexual violence 19 june 2008 un doc sres1820 ", "ProcessedSent": "n guideline justice matter involving child victim witness 22 july 2005 resolution 200520 see un doc", "SentID": 11537 }, { "ParagraphID": 3207, - "Paragraph": "International Standards and Resolutions \\n Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (\u201cThe Beijing Rules\u201d), 29 November 1985, UN Doc. A\/RES\/40\/33. \\n Guidelines on Justice Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses, 22 July 2005, Resolution 2005\/20 see UN Doc. E\/2005\/INF\/2\/Add.1. \\n Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparations for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, 21 March 2006, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post- conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2002\/616. \\n \u2014, Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, 31 October 2000, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1325. \\n \u2014, Resolution 1820 on Sexual Violence, 19 June 2008, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1820. ", + "Paragraph": "International Standards and Resolutions \n Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (\u201cThe Beijing Rules\u201d), 29 November 1985, UN Doc. A\/RES\/40\/33. \n Guidelines on Justice Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses, 22 July 2005, Resolution 2005\/20 see UN Doc. E\/2005\/INF\/2\/Add.1. \n Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparations for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, 21 March 2006, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post- conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2002\/616. \n \u2014, Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, 31 October 2000, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1325. \n \u2014, Resolution 1820 on Sexual Violence, 19 June 2008, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1820. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207703,7 +207703,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3207, - "Paragraph": "International Standards and Resolutions \\n Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (\u201cThe Beijing Rules\u201d), 29 November 1985, UN Doc. A\/RES\/40\/33. \\n Guidelines on Justice Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses, 22 July 2005, Resolution 2005\/20 see UN Doc. E\/2005\/INF\/2\/Add.1. \\n Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparations for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, 21 March 2006, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post- conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2002\/616. \\n \u2014, Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, 31 October 2000, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1325. \\n \u2014, Resolution 1820 on Sexual Violence, 19 June 2008, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1820. ", + "Paragraph": "International Standards and Resolutions \n Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (\u201cThe Beijing Rules\u201d), 29 November 1985, UN Doc. A\/RES\/40\/33. \n Guidelines on Justice Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses, 22 July 2005, Resolution 2005\/20 see UN Doc. E\/2005\/INF\/2\/Add.1. \n Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparations for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, 21 March 2006, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post- conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2002\/616. \n \u2014, Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, 31 October 2000, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1325. \n \u2014, Resolution 1820 on Sexual Violence, 19 June 2008, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1820. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207714,14 +207714,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparations for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, 21 March 2006, UN Doc.", + "Sentence": "\n Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparations for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, 21 March 2006, UN Doc.", "newParagraph": "international standard resolution n updated set principle protection promotion human right action combat impunity 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102add1 n united nation standard minimum rule administration juvenile justice beijing rule 29 november 1985 un doc ares4033 n guideline justice matter involving child victim witness 22 july 2005 resolution 200520 see un doc e2005inf2add1 n basic principle guideline right remedy reparation victim gross violation international human right law international humanitarian law 21 march 2006 un doc ares60147 n report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict post conflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2002616 n resolution 1325 woman peace security 31 october 2000 un doc sres1325 n resolution 1820 sexual violence 19 june 2008 un doc sres1820 ", "ProcessedSent": "n basic principle guideline right remedy reparation victim gross violation international human right law international humanitarian law 21 march 2006 un doc", "SentID": 11539 }, { "ParagraphID": 3207, - "Paragraph": "International Standards and Resolutions \\n Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (\u201cThe Beijing Rules\u201d), 29 November 1985, UN Doc. A\/RES\/40\/33. \\n Guidelines on Justice Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses, 22 July 2005, Resolution 2005\/20 see UN Doc. E\/2005\/INF\/2\/Add.1. \\n Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparations for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, 21 March 2006, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post- conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2002\/616. \\n \u2014, Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, 31 October 2000, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1325. \\n \u2014, Resolution 1820 on Sexual Violence, 19 June 2008, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1820. ", + "Paragraph": "International Standards and Resolutions \n Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (\u201cThe Beijing Rules\u201d), 29 November 1985, UN Doc. A\/RES\/40\/33. \n Guidelines on Justice Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses, 22 July 2005, Resolution 2005\/20 see UN Doc. E\/2005\/INF\/2\/Add.1. \n Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparations for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, 21 March 2006, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post- conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2002\/616. \n \u2014, Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, 31 October 2000, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1325. \n \u2014, Resolution 1820 on Sexual Violence, 19 June 2008, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1820. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207739,7 +207739,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3207, - "Paragraph": "International Standards and Resolutions \\n Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (\u201cThe Beijing Rules\u201d), 29 November 1985, UN Doc. A\/RES\/40\/33. \\n Guidelines on Justice Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses, 22 July 2005, Resolution 2005\/20 see UN Doc. E\/2005\/INF\/2\/Add.1. \\n Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparations for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, 21 March 2006, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post- conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2002\/616. \\n \u2014, Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, 31 October 2000, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1325. \\n \u2014, Resolution 1820 on Sexual Violence, 19 June 2008, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1820. ", + "Paragraph": "International Standards and Resolutions \n Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (\u201cThe Beijing Rules\u201d), 29 November 1985, UN Doc. A\/RES\/40\/33. \n Guidelines on Justice Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses, 22 July 2005, Resolution 2005\/20 see UN Doc. E\/2005\/INF\/2\/Add.1. \n Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparations for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, 21 March 2006, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post- conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2002\/616. \n \u2014, Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, 31 October 2000, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1325. \n \u2014, Resolution 1820 on Sexual Violence, 19 June 2008, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1820. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207750,14 +207750,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post- conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc.", + "Sentence": "\n Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post- conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc.", "newParagraph": "international standard resolution n updated set principle protection promotion human right action combat impunity 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102add1 n united nation standard minimum rule administration juvenile justice beijing rule 29 november 1985 un doc ares4033 n guideline justice matter involving child victim witness 22 july 2005 resolution 200520 see un doc e2005inf2add1 n basic principle guideline right remedy reparation victim gross violation international human right law international humanitarian law 21 march 2006 un doc ares60147 n report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict post conflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2002616 n resolution 1325 woman peace security 31 october 2000 un doc sres1325 n resolution 1820 sexual violence 19 june 2008 un doc sres1820 ", "ProcessedSent": "n report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict post conflict society 3 august 2004 un doc", "SentID": 11541 }, { "ParagraphID": 3207, - "Paragraph": "International Standards and Resolutions \\n Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (\u201cThe Beijing Rules\u201d), 29 November 1985, UN Doc. A\/RES\/40\/33. \\n Guidelines on Justice Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses, 22 July 2005, Resolution 2005\/20 see UN Doc. E\/2005\/INF\/2\/Add.1. \\n Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparations for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, 21 March 2006, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post- conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2002\/616. \\n \u2014, Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, 31 October 2000, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1325. \\n \u2014, Resolution 1820 on Sexual Violence, 19 June 2008, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1820. ", + "Paragraph": "International Standards and Resolutions \n Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (\u201cThe Beijing Rules\u201d), 29 November 1985, UN Doc. A\/RES\/40\/33. \n Guidelines on Justice Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses, 22 July 2005, Resolution 2005\/20 see UN Doc. E\/2005\/INF\/2\/Add.1. \n Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparations for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, 21 March 2006, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post- conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2002\/616. \n \u2014, Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, 31 October 2000, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1325. \n \u2014, Resolution 1820 on Sexual Violence, 19 June 2008, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1820. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207775,7 +207775,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3207, - "Paragraph": "International Standards and Resolutions \\n Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (\u201cThe Beijing Rules\u201d), 29 November 1985, UN Doc. A\/RES\/40\/33. \\n Guidelines on Justice Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses, 22 July 2005, Resolution 2005\/20 see UN Doc. E\/2005\/INF\/2\/Add.1. \\n Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparations for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, 21 March 2006, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post- conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2002\/616. \\n \u2014, Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, 31 October 2000, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1325. \\n \u2014, Resolution 1820 on Sexual Violence, 19 June 2008, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1820. ", + "Paragraph": "International Standards and Resolutions \n Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (\u201cThe Beijing Rules\u201d), 29 November 1985, UN Doc. A\/RES\/40\/33. \n Guidelines on Justice Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses, 22 July 2005, Resolution 2005\/20 see UN Doc. E\/2005\/INF\/2\/Add.1. \n Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparations for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, 21 March 2006, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post- conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2002\/616. \n \u2014, Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, 31 October 2000, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1325. \n \u2014, Resolution 1820 on Sexual Violence, 19 June 2008, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1820. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207786,14 +207786,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n \u2014, Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, 31 October 2000, UN Doc.", + "Sentence": "\n \u2014, Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, 31 October 2000, UN Doc.", "newParagraph": "international standard resolution n updated set principle protection promotion human right action combat impunity 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102add1 n united nation standard minimum rule administration juvenile justice beijing rule 29 november 1985 un doc ares4033 n guideline justice matter involving child victim witness 22 july 2005 resolution 200520 see un doc e2005inf2add1 n basic principle guideline right remedy reparation victim gross violation international human right law international humanitarian law 21 march 2006 un doc ares60147 n report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict post conflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2002616 n resolution 1325 woman peace security 31 october 2000 un doc sres1325 n resolution 1820 sexual violence 19 june 2008 un doc sres1820 ", "ProcessedSent": "n resolution 1325 woman peace security 31 october 2000 un doc", "SentID": 11543 }, { "ParagraphID": 3207, - "Paragraph": "International Standards and Resolutions \\n Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (\u201cThe Beijing Rules\u201d), 29 November 1985, UN Doc. A\/RES\/40\/33. \\n Guidelines on Justice Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses, 22 July 2005, Resolution 2005\/20 see UN Doc. E\/2005\/INF\/2\/Add.1. \\n Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparations for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, 21 March 2006, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post- conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2002\/616. \\n \u2014, Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, 31 October 2000, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1325. \\n \u2014, Resolution 1820 on Sexual Violence, 19 June 2008, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1820. ", + "Paragraph": "International Standards and Resolutions \n Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (\u201cThe Beijing Rules\u201d), 29 November 1985, UN Doc. A\/RES\/40\/33. \n Guidelines on Justice Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses, 22 July 2005, Resolution 2005\/20 see UN Doc. E\/2005\/INF\/2\/Add.1. \n Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparations for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, 21 March 2006, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post- conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2002\/616. \n \u2014, Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, 31 October 2000, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1325. \n \u2014, Resolution 1820 on Sexual Violence, 19 June 2008, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1820. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207811,7 +207811,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3207, - "Paragraph": "International Standards and Resolutions \\n Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (\u201cThe Beijing Rules\u201d), 29 November 1985, UN Doc. A\/RES\/40\/33. \\n Guidelines on Justice Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses, 22 July 2005, Resolution 2005\/20 see UN Doc. E\/2005\/INF\/2\/Add.1. \\n Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparations for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, 21 March 2006, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post- conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2002\/616. \\n \u2014, Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, 31 October 2000, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1325. \\n \u2014, Resolution 1820 on Sexual Violence, 19 June 2008, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1820. ", + "Paragraph": "International Standards and Resolutions \n Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (\u201cThe Beijing Rules\u201d), 29 November 1985, UN Doc. A\/RES\/40\/33. \n Guidelines on Justice Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses, 22 July 2005, Resolution 2005\/20 see UN Doc. E\/2005\/INF\/2\/Add.1. \n Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparations for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, 21 March 2006, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post- conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2002\/616. \n \u2014, Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, 31 October 2000, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1325. \n \u2014, Resolution 1820 on Sexual Violence, 19 June 2008, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1820. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207822,14 +207822,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n \u2014, Resolution 1820 on Sexual Violence, 19 June 2008, UN Doc.", + "Sentence": "\n \u2014, Resolution 1820 on Sexual Violence, 19 June 2008, UN Doc.", "newParagraph": "international standard resolution n updated set principle protection promotion human right action combat impunity 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102add1 n united nation standard minimum rule administration juvenile justice beijing rule 29 november 1985 un doc ares4033 n guideline justice matter involving child victim witness 22 july 2005 resolution 200520 see un doc e2005inf2add1 n basic principle guideline right remedy reparation victim gross violation international human right law international humanitarian law 21 march 2006 un doc ares60147 n report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict post conflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2002616 n resolution 1325 woman peace security 31 october 2000 un doc sres1325 n resolution 1820 sexual violence 19 june 2008 un doc sres1820 ", "ProcessedSent": "n resolution 1820 sexual violence 19 june 2008 un doc", "SentID": 11545 }, { "ParagraphID": 3207, - "Paragraph": "International Standards and Resolutions \\n Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (\u201cThe Beijing Rules\u201d), 29 November 1985, UN Doc. A\/RES\/40\/33. \\n Guidelines on Justice Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses, 22 July 2005, Resolution 2005\/20 see UN Doc. E\/2005\/INF\/2\/Add.1. \\n Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparations for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, 21 March 2006, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post- conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2002\/616. \\n \u2014, Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, 31 October 2000, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1325. \\n \u2014, Resolution 1820 on Sexual Violence, 19 June 2008, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1820. ", + "Paragraph": "International Standards and Resolutions \n Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (\u201cThe Beijing Rules\u201d), 29 November 1985, UN Doc. A\/RES\/40\/33. \n Guidelines on Justice Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses, 22 July 2005, Resolution 2005\/20 see UN Doc. E\/2005\/INF\/2\/Add.1. \n Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparations for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, 21 March 2006, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post- conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2002\/616. \n \u2014, Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, 31 October 2000, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1325. \n \u2014, Resolution 1820 on Sexual Violence, 19 June 2008, UN Doc. S\/RES\/1820. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207847,7 +207847,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3208, - "Paragraph": "Rule of Law Tools \\n Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Amnesties. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2009. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Maximizing the Legacy of Hybrid Courts. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Reparations Programmes. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Prosecutions Initiatives. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Truth Commissions. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Vetting: An Operational Framework. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006.", + "Paragraph": "Rule of Law Tools \n Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Amnesties. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2009. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Maximizing the Legacy of Hybrid Courts. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Reparations Programmes. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Prosecutions Initiatives. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Truth Commissions. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Vetting: An Operational Framework. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207858,14 +207858,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Rule of Law Tools \\n Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Amnesties.", + "Sentence": "Rule of Law Tools \n Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Amnesties.", "newParagraph": "rule law tool n office high commissioner human right rule law tool postconflict state amnesty united nation new york geneva 2009 n rule law tool postconflict state maximizing legacy hybrid court united nation new york geneva 2008 n rule law tool postconflict state reparation programme united nation new york geneva 2008 n rule law tool postconflict state prosecution initiative united nation new york geneva 2006 n rule law tool postconflict state truth commission united nation new york geneva 2006 n rule law tool postconflict state vetting operational framework united nation new york geneva 2006", "ProcessedSent": "rule law tool n office high commissioner human right rule law tool postconflict state amnesty", "SentID": 11547 }, { "ParagraphID": 3208, - "Paragraph": "Rule of Law Tools \\n Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Amnesties. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2009. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Maximizing the Legacy of Hybrid Courts. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Reparations Programmes. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Prosecutions Initiatives. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Truth Commissions. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Vetting: An Operational Framework. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006.", + "Paragraph": "Rule of Law Tools \n Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Amnesties. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2009. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Maximizing the Legacy of Hybrid Courts. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Reparations Programmes. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Prosecutions Initiatives. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Truth Commissions. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Vetting: An Operational Framework. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207883,7 +207883,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3208, - "Paragraph": "Rule of Law Tools \\n Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Amnesties. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2009. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Maximizing the Legacy of Hybrid Courts. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Reparations Programmes. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Prosecutions Initiatives. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Truth Commissions. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Vetting: An Operational Framework. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006.", + "Paragraph": "Rule of Law Tools \n Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Amnesties. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2009. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Maximizing the Legacy of Hybrid Courts. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Reparations Programmes. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Prosecutions Initiatives. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Truth Commissions. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Vetting: An Operational Framework. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207894,14 +207894,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Maximizing the Legacy of Hybrid Courts.", + "Sentence": "\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Maximizing the Legacy of Hybrid Courts.", "newParagraph": "rule law tool n office high commissioner human right rule law tool postconflict state amnesty united nation new york geneva 2009 n rule law tool postconflict state maximizing legacy hybrid court united nation new york geneva 2008 n rule law tool postconflict state reparation programme united nation new york geneva 2008 n rule law tool postconflict state prosecution initiative united nation new york geneva 2006 n rule law tool postconflict state truth commission united nation new york geneva 2006 n rule law tool postconflict state vetting operational framework united nation new york geneva 2006", "ProcessedSent": "n rule law tool postconflict state maximizing legacy hybrid court", "SentID": 11549 }, { "ParagraphID": 3208, - "Paragraph": "Rule of Law Tools \\n Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Amnesties. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2009. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Maximizing the Legacy of Hybrid Courts. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Reparations Programmes. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Prosecutions Initiatives. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Truth Commissions. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Vetting: An Operational Framework. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006.", + "Paragraph": "Rule of Law Tools \n Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Amnesties. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2009. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Maximizing the Legacy of Hybrid Courts. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Reparations Programmes. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Prosecutions Initiatives. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Truth Commissions. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Vetting: An Operational Framework. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207919,7 +207919,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3208, - "Paragraph": "Rule of Law Tools \\n Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Amnesties. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2009. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Maximizing the Legacy of Hybrid Courts. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Reparations Programmes. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Prosecutions Initiatives. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Truth Commissions. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Vetting: An Operational Framework. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006.", + "Paragraph": "Rule of Law Tools \n Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Amnesties. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2009. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Maximizing the Legacy of Hybrid Courts. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Reparations Programmes. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Prosecutions Initiatives. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Truth Commissions. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Vetting: An Operational Framework. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207930,14 +207930,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Reparations Programmes.", + "Sentence": "\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Reparations Programmes.", "newParagraph": "rule law tool n office high commissioner human right rule law tool postconflict state amnesty united nation new york geneva 2009 n rule law tool postconflict state maximizing legacy hybrid court united nation new york geneva 2008 n rule law tool postconflict state reparation programme united nation new york geneva 2008 n rule law tool postconflict state prosecution initiative united nation new york geneva 2006 n rule law tool postconflict state truth commission united nation new york geneva 2006 n rule law tool postconflict state vetting operational framework united nation new york geneva 2006", "ProcessedSent": "n rule law tool postconflict state reparation programme", "SentID": 11551 }, { "ParagraphID": 3208, - "Paragraph": "Rule of Law Tools \\n Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Amnesties. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2009. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Maximizing the Legacy of Hybrid Courts. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Reparations Programmes. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Prosecutions Initiatives. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Truth Commissions. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Vetting: An Operational Framework. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006.", + "Paragraph": "Rule of Law Tools \n Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Amnesties. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2009. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Maximizing the Legacy of Hybrid Courts. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Reparations Programmes. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Prosecutions Initiatives. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Truth Commissions. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Vetting: An Operational Framework. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207955,7 +207955,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3208, - "Paragraph": "Rule of Law Tools \\n Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Amnesties. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2009. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Maximizing the Legacy of Hybrid Courts. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Reparations Programmes. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Prosecutions Initiatives. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Truth Commissions. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Vetting: An Operational Framework. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006.", + "Paragraph": "Rule of Law Tools \n Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Amnesties. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2009. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Maximizing the Legacy of Hybrid Courts. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Reparations Programmes. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Prosecutions Initiatives. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Truth Commissions. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Vetting: An Operational Framework. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207966,14 +207966,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Prosecutions Initiatives.", + "Sentence": "\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Prosecutions Initiatives.", "newParagraph": "rule law tool n office high commissioner human right rule law tool postconflict state amnesty united nation new york geneva 2009 n rule law tool postconflict state maximizing legacy hybrid court united nation new york geneva 2008 n rule law tool postconflict state reparation programme united nation new york geneva 2008 n rule law tool postconflict state prosecution initiative united nation new york geneva 2006 n rule law tool postconflict state truth commission united nation new york geneva 2006 n rule law tool postconflict state vetting operational framework united nation new york geneva 2006", "ProcessedSent": "n rule law tool postconflict state prosecution initiative", "SentID": 11553 }, { "ParagraphID": 3208, - "Paragraph": "Rule of Law Tools \\n Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Amnesties. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2009. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Maximizing the Legacy of Hybrid Courts. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Reparations Programmes. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Prosecutions Initiatives. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Truth Commissions. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Vetting: An Operational Framework. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006.", + "Paragraph": "Rule of Law Tools \n Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Amnesties. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2009. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Maximizing the Legacy of Hybrid Courts. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Reparations Programmes. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Prosecutions Initiatives. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Truth Commissions. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Vetting: An Operational Framework. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -207991,7 +207991,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3208, - "Paragraph": "Rule of Law Tools \\n Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Amnesties. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2009. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Maximizing the Legacy of Hybrid Courts. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Reparations Programmes. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Prosecutions Initiatives. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Truth Commissions. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Vetting: An Operational Framework. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006.", + "Paragraph": "Rule of Law Tools \n Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Amnesties. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2009. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Maximizing the Legacy of Hybrid Courts. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Reparations Programmes. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Prosecutions Initiatives. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Truth Commissions. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Vetting: An Operational Framework. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208002,14 +208002,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Truth Commissions.", + "Sentence": "\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Truth Commissions.", "newParagraph": "rule law tool n office high commissioner human right rule law tool postconflict state amnesty united nation new york geneva 2009 n rule law tool postconflict state maximizing legacy hybrid court united nation new york geneva 2008 n rule law tool postconflict state reparation programme united nation new york geneva 2008 n rule law tool postconflict state prosecution initiative united nation new york geneva 2006 n rule law tool postconflict state truth commission united nation new york geneva 2006 n rule law tool postconflict state vetting operational framework united nation new york geneva 2006", "ProcessedSent": "n rule law tool postconflict state truth commission", "SentID": 11555 }, { "ParagraphID": 3208, - "Paragraph": "Rule of Law Tools \\n Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Amnesties. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2009. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Maximizing the Legacy of Hybrid Courts. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Reparations Programmes. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Prosecutions Initiatives. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Truth Commissions. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Vetting: An Operational Framework. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006.", + "Paragraph": "Rule of Law Tools \n Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Amnesties. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2009. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Maximizing the Legacy of Hybrid Courts. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Reparations Programmes. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Prosecutions Initiatives. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Truth Commissions. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Vetting: An Operational Framework. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208027,7 +208027,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3208, - "Paragraph": "Rule of Law Tools \\n Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Amnesties. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2009. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Maximizing the Legacy of Hybrid Courts. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Reparations Programmes. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Prosecutions Initiatives. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Truth Commissions. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Vetting: An Operational Framework. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006.", + "Paragraph": "Rule of Law Tools \n Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Amnesties. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2009. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Maximizing the Legacy of Hybrid Courts. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Reparations Programmes. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Prosecutions Initiatives. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Truth Commissions. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Vetting: An Operational Framework. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208038,14 +208038,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Vetting: An Operational Framework.", + "Sentence": "\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Vetting: An Operational Framework.", "newParagraph": "rule law tool n office high commissioner human right rule law tool postconflict state amnesty united nation new york geneva 2009 n rule law tool postconflict state maximizing legacy hybrid court united nation new york geneva 2008 n rule law tool postconflict state reparation programme united nation new york geneva 2008 n rule law tool postconflict state prosecution initiative united nation new york geneva 2006 n rule law tool postconflict state truth commission united nation new york geneva 2006 n rule law tool postconflict state vetting operational framework united nation new york geneva 2006", "ProcessedSent": "n rule law tool postconflict state vetting operational framework", "SentID": 11557 }, { "ParagraphID": 3208, - "Paragraph": "Rule of Law Tools \\n Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Amnesties. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2009. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Maximizing the Legacy of Hybrid Courts. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Reparations Programmes. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Prosecutions Initiatives. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Truth Commissions. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \\n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Vetting: An Operational Framework. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006.", + "Paragraph": "Rule of Law Tools \n Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Amnesties. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2009. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Maximizing the Legacy of Hybrid Courts. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Reparations Programmes. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Prosecutions Initiatives. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Truth Commissions. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006. \n \u2014, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Vetting: An Operational Framework. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2006.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208063,7 +208063,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3209, - "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \\n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \\n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \\n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \\n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \\n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", + "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208074,14 +208074,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Analysis and Case Studies \\n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d.", + "Sentence": "Analysis and Case Studies \n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d.", "newParagraph": "analysis case study n baptistalundin ira\u00ea peace process mozambique case study ddr transi tional justice new york international center transitional justice n de greiff pablo contributing peace justice finding balance ddr reparation paper presented conference building future peace justice nuremberg germany june 2527 2007 available httpwwwpeacejusticeconferenceinfodocumentsasp n de greiff p ed handbook reparation oxford university international center transitional justice 2006 n king jamesina gender reparation sierra leone wound war remain open happened woman gender reparation human right violation edited ruth rubiomarin new york social science research council international center transitional justice pp 246283 n mayerrieckh alexander preventing abuse vetting transitional form justice prevention vetting public employee transitional society edited alexander mayerrieckh pablo de greiff new york social science research council international center transitional justice 2007 pp 482521 n multicountry demobilization reintegration program resource available http wwwmdrporg n stockholm initiative disarmament demobilisation reintegration stockholm ministry foreign affair sweden 2006 final report background study available httpwwwswedengovsesbd4890 n van der merwe hugo guy lamb ddr transitional justice south africa case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n waldorf lars transitional justice ddr postgenocide rwanda case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n weinstein jeremy macartan humphreys disentangling determinant successful demobilization reintegration working paper 69 washington dc center global development 2005 n alie j reconciliation transitional justice traditionbased practice kpaa mende sierra leone huyse l n salter ed traditional justice reconciliation violent conflict learning african experience stockholm international idea 2008 p 142 n waldorf l mass justice mass atrocity rethinking local justice transitional justice temple law review 79 1 2006 pp 187 n van der mere h lamb g ddr transitional justice south africa case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n part 9 community reconciliation commission reception truth reconciliation east timor p 4 httpwwwictjorgstatictimorcavrenglish09communityreconciliation pdf accessed 12 august 2008", "ProcessedSent": "analysis case study n baptistalundin ira\u00ea peace process mozambique ", "SentID": 11559 }, { "ParagraphID": 3209, - "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \\n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \\n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \\n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \\n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \\n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", + "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208099,7 +208099,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3209, - "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \\n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \\n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \\n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \\n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \\n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", + "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208117,7 +208117,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3209, - "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \\n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \\n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \\n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \\n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \\n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", + "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208128,14 +208128,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007).", + "Sentence": "\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007).", "newParagraph": "analysis case study n baptistalundin ira\u00ea peace process mozambique case study ddr transi tional justice new york international center transitional justice n de greiff pablo contributing peace justice finding balance ddr reparation paper presented conference building future peace justice nuremberg germany june 2527 2007 available httpwwwpeacejusticeconferenceinfodocumentsasp n de greiff p ed handbook reparation oxford university international center transitional justice 2006 n king jamesina gender reparation sierra leone wound war remain open happened woman gender reparation human right violation edited ruth rubiomarin new york social science research council international center transitional justice pp 246283 n mayerrieckh alexander preventing abuse vetting transitional form justice prevention vetting public employee transitional society edited alexander mayerrieckh pablo de greiff new york social science research council international center transitional justice 2007 pp 482521 n multicountry demobilization reintegration program resource available http wwwmdrporg n stockholm initiative disarmament demobilisation reintegration stockholm ministry foreign affair sweden 2006 final report background study available httpwwwswedengovsesbd4890 n van der merwe hugo guy lamb ddr transitional justice south africa case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n waldorf lars transitional justice ddr postgenocide rwanda case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n weinstein jeremy macartan humphreys disentangling determinant successful demobilization reintegration working paper 69 washington dc center global development 2005 n alie j reconciliation transitional justice traditionbased practice kpaa mende sierra leone huyse l n salter ed traditional justice reconciliation violent conflict learning african experience stockholm international idea 2008 p 142 n waldorf l mass justice mass atrocity rethinking local justice transitional justice temple law review 79 1 2006 pp 187 n van der mere h lamb g ddr transitional justice south africa case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n part 9 community reconciliation commission reception truth reconciliation east timor p 4 httpwwwictjorgstatictimorcavrenglish09communityreconciliation pdf accessed 12 august 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n de greiff pablo contributing peace justice finding balance ddr reparation paper presented conference building future peace justice nuremberg germany june 2527 2007", "SentID": 11562 }, { "ParagraphID": 3209, - "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \\n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \\n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \\n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \\n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \\n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", + "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208146,14 +208146,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \\n De Greiff, P.", + "Sentence": "Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \n De Greiff, P.", "newParagraph": "analysis case study n baptistalundin ira\u00ea peace process mozambique case study ddr transi tional justice new york international center transitional justice n de greiff pablo contributing peace justice finding balance ddr reparation paper presented conference building future peace justice nuremberg germany june 2527 2007 available httpwwwpeacejusticeconferenceinfodocumentsasp n de greiff p ed handbook reparation oxford university international center transitional justice 2006 n king jamesina gender reparation sierra leone wound war remain open happened woman gender reparation human right violation edited ruth rubiomarin new york social science research council international center transitional justice pp 246283 n mayerrieckh alexander preventing abuse vetting transitional form justice prevention vetting public employee transitional society edited alexander mayerrieckh pablo de greiff new york social science research council international center transitional justice 2007 pp 482521 n multicountry demobilization reintegration program resource available http wwwmdrporg n stockholm initiative disarmament demobilisation reintegration stockholm ministry foreign affair sweden 2006 final report background study available httpwwwswedengovsesbd4890 n van der merwe hugo guy lamb ddr transitional justice south africa case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n waldorf lars transitional justice ddr postgenocide rwanda case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n weinstein jeremy macartan humphreys disentangling determinant successful demobilization reintegration working paper 69 washington dc center global development 2005 n alie j reconciliation transitional justice traditionbased practice kpaa mende sierra leone huyse l n salter ed traditional justice reconciliation violent conflict learning african experience stockholm international idea 2008 p 142 n waldorf l mass justice mass atrocity rethinking local justice transitional justice temple law review 79 1 2006 pp 187 n van der mere h lamb g ddr transitional justice south africa case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n part 9 community reconciliation commission reception truth reconciliation east timor p 4 httpwwwictjorgstatictimorcavrenglish09communityreconciliation pdf accessed 12 august 2008", "ProcessedSent": "available httpwwwpeacejusticeconferenceinfodocumentsasp n de greiff p", "SentID": 11563 }, { "ParagraphID": 3209, - "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \\n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \\n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \\n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \\n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \\n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", + "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208171,7 +208171,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3209, - "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \\n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \\n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \\n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \\n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \\n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", + "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208182,14 +208182,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \\n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin.", + "Sentence": "), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin.", "newParagraph": "analysis case study n baptistalundin ira\u00ea peace process mozambique case study ddr transi tional justice new york international center transitional justice n de greiff pablo contributing peace justice finding balance ddr reparation paper presented conference building future peace justice nuremberg germany june 2527 2007 available httpwwwpeacejusticeconferenceinfodocumentsasp n de greiff p ed handbook reparation oxford university international center transitional justice 2006 n king jamesina gender reparation sierra leone wound war remain open happened woman gender reparation human right violation edited ruth rubiomarin new york social science research council international center transitional justice pp 246283 n mayerrieckh alexander preventing abuse vetting transitional form justice prevention vetting public employee transitional society edited alexander mayerrieckh pablo de greiff new york social science research council international center transitional justice 2007 pp 482521 n multicountry demobilization reintegration program resource available http wwwmdrporg n stockholm initiative disarmament demobilisation reintegration stockholm ministry foreign affair sweden 2006 final report background study available httpwwwswedengovsesbd4890 n van der merwe hugo guy lamb ddr transitional justice south africa case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n waldorf lars transitional justice ddr postgenocide rwanda case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n weinstein jeremy macartan humphreys disentangling determinant successful demobilization reintegration working paper 69 washington dc center global development 2005 n alie j reconciliation transitional justice traditionbased practice kpaa mende sierra leone huyse l n salter ed traditional justice reconciliation violent conflict learning african experience stockholm international idea 2008 p 142 n waldorf l mass justice mass atrocity rethinking local justice transitional justice temple law review 79 1 2006 pp 187 n van der mere h lamb g ddr transitional justice south africa case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n part 9 community reconciliation commission reception truth reconciliation east timor p 4 httpwwwictjorgstatictimorcavrenglish09communityreconciliation pdf accessed 12 august 2008", "ProcessedSent": " handbook reparation oxford university international center transitional justice 2006 n king jamesina gender reparation sierra leone wound war remain open happened woman gender reparation human right violation edited ruth rubiomarin", "SentID": 11565 }, { "ParagraphID": 3209, - "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \\n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \\n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \\n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \\n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \\n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", + "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208207,7 +208207,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3209, - "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \\n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \\n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \\n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \\n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \\n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", + "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208225,7 +208225,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3209, - "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \\n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \\n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \\n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \\n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \\n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", + "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208236,14 +208236,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff.", + "Sentence": "\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff.", "newParagraph": "analysis case study n baptistalundin ira\u00ea peace process mozambique case study ddr transi tional justice new york international center transitional justice n de greiff pablo contributing peace justice finding balance ddr reparation paper presented conference building future peace justice nuremberg germany june 2527 2007 available httpwwwpeacejusticeconferenceinfodocumentsasp n de greiff p ed handbook reparation oxford university international center transitional justice 2006 n king jamesina gender reparation sierra leone wound war remain open happened woman gender reparation human right violation edited ruth rubiomarin new york social science research council international center transitional justice pp 246283 n mayerrieckh alexander preventing abuse vetting transitional form justice prevention vetting public employee transitional society edited alexander mayerrieckh pablo de greiff new york social science research council international center transitional justice 2007 pp 482521 n multicountry demobilization reintegration program resource available http wwwmdrporg n stockholm initiative disarmament demobilisation reintegration stockholm ministry foreign affair sweden 2006 final report background study available httpwwwswedengovsesbd4890 n van der merwe hugo guy lamb ddr transitional justice south africa case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n waldorf lars transitional justice ddr postgenocide rwanda case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n weinstein jeremy macartan humphreys disentangling determinant successful demobilization reintegration working paper 69 washington dc center global development 2005 n alie j reconciliation transitional justice traditionbased practice kpaa mende sierra leone huyse l n salter ed traditional justice reconciliation violent conflict learning african experience stockholm international idea 2008 p 142 n waldorf l mass justice mass atrocity rethinking local justice transitional justice temple law review 79 1 2006 pp 187 n van der mere h lamb g ddr transitional justice south africa case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n part 9 community reconciliation commission reception truth reconciliation east timor p 4 httpwwwictjorgstatictimorcavrenglish09communityreconciliation pdf accessed 12 august 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n mayerrieckh alexander preventing abuse vetting transitional form justice prevention vetting public employee transitional society edited alexander mayerrieckh pablo de greiff", "SentID": 11568 }, { "ParagraphID": 3209, - "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \\n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \\n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \\n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \\n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \\n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", + "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208261,7 +208261,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3209, - "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \\n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \\n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \\n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \\n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \\n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", + "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208279,7 +208279,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3209, - "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \\n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \\n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \\n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \\n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \\n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", + "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208290,14 +208290,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org.", + "Sentence": "\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org.", "newParagraph": "analysis case study n baptistalundin ira\u00ea peace process mozambique case study ddr transi tional justice new york international center transitional justice n de greiff pablo contributing peace justice finding balance ddr reparation paper presented conference building future peace justice nuremberg germany june 2527 2007 available httpwwwpeacejusticeconferenceinfodocumentsasp n de greiff p ed handbook reparation oxford university international center transitional justice 2006 n king jamesina gender reparation sierra leone wound war remain open happened woman gender reparation human right violation edited ruth rubiomarin new york social science research council international center transitional justice pp 246283 n mayerrieckh alexander preventing abuse vetting transitional form justice prevention vetting public employee transitional society edited alexander mayerrieckh pablo de greiff new york social science research council international center transitional justice 2007 pp 482521 n multicountry demobilization reintegration program resource available http wwwmdrporg n stockholm initiative disarmament demobilisation reintegration stockholm ministry foreign affair sweden 2006 final report background study available httpwwwswedengovsesbd4890 n van der merwe hugo guy lamb ddr transitional justice south africa case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n waldorf lars transitional justice ddr postgenocide rwanda case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n weinstein jeremy macartan humphreys disentangling determinant successful demobilization reintegration working paper 69 washington dc center global development 2005 n alie j reconciliation transitional justice traditionbased practice kpaa mende sierra leone huyse l n salter ed traditional justice reconciliation violent conflict learning african experience stockholm international idea 2008 p 142 n waldorf l mass justice mass atrocity rethinking local justice transitional justice temple law review 79 1 2006 pp 187 n van der mere h lamb g ddr transitional justice south africa case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n part 9 community reconciliation commission reception truth reconciliation east timor p 4 httpwwwictjorgstatictimorcavrenglish09communityreconciliation pdf accessed 12 august 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n multicountry demobilization reintegration program resource available http wwwmdrporg", "SentID": 11571 }, { "ParagraphID": 3209, - "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \\n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \\n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \\n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \\n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \\n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", + "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208308,14 +208308,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006.", + "Sentence": "\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006.", "newParagraph": "analysis case study n baptistalundin ira\u00ea peace process mozambique case study ddr transi tional justice new york international center transitional justice n de greiff pablo contributing peace justice finding balance ddr reparation paper presented conference building future peace justice nuremberg germany june 2527 2007 available httpwwwpeacejusticeconferenceinfodocumentsasp n de greiff p ed handbook reparation oxford university international center transitional justice 2006 n king jamesina gender reparation sierra leone wound war remain open happened woman gender reparation human right violation edited ruth rubiomarin new york social science research council international center transitional justice pp 246283 n mayerrieckh alexander preventing abuse vetting transitional form justice prevention vetting public employee transitional society edited alexander mayerrieckh pablo de greiff new york social science research council international center transitional justice 2007 pp 482521 n multicountry demobilization reintegration program resource available http wwwmdrporg n stockholm initiative disarmament demobilisation reintegration stockholm ministry foreign affair sweden 2006 final report background study available httpwwwswedengovsesbd4890 n van der merwe hugo guy lamb ddr transitional justice south africa case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n waldorf lars transitional justice ddr postgenocide rwanda case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n weinstein jeremy macartan humphreys disentangling determinant successful demobilization reintegration working paper 69 washington dc center global development 2005 n alie j reconciliation transitional justice traditionbased practice kpaa mende sierra leone huyse l n salter ed traditional justice reconciliation violent conflict learning african experience stockholm international idea 2008 p 142 n waldorf l mass justice mass atrocity rethinking local justice transitional justice temple law review 79 1 2006 pp 187 n van der mere h lamb g ddr transitional justice south africa case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n part 9 community reconciliation commission reception truth reconciliation east timor p 4 httpwwwictjorgstatictimorcavrenglish09communityreconciliation pdf accessed 12 august 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n stockholm initiative disarmament demobilisation reintegration stockholm ministry foreign affair sweden 2006", "SentID": 11572 }, { "ParagraphID": 3209, - "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \\n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \\n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \\n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \\n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \\n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", + "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208326,14 +208326,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \\n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d.", + "Sentence": "Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d.", "newParagraph": "analysis case study n baptistalundin ira\u00ea peace process mozambique case study ddr transi tional justice new york international center transitional justice n de greiff pablo contributing peace justice finding balance ddr reparation paper presented conference building future peace justice nuremberg germany june 2527 2007 available httpwwwpeacejusticeconferenceinfodocumentsasp n de greiff p ed handbook reparation oxford university international center transitional justice 2006 n king jamesina gender reparation sierra leone wound war remain open happened woman gender reparation human right violation edited ruth rubiomarin new york social science research council international center transitional justice pp 246283 n mayerrieckh alexander preventing abuse vetting transitional form justice prevention vetting public employee transitional society edited alexander mayerrieckh pablo de greiff new york social science research council international center transitional justice 2007 pp 482521 n multicountry demobilization reintegration program resource available http wwwmdrporg n stockholm initiative disarmament demobilisation reintegration stockholm ministry foreign affair sweden 2006 final report background study available httpwwwswedengovsesbd4890 n van der merwe hugo guy lamb ddr transitional justice south africa case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n waldorf lars transitional justice ddr postgenocide rwanda case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n weinstein jeremy macartan humphreys disentangling determinant successful demobilization reintegration working paper 69 washington dc center global development 2005 n alie j reconciliation transitional justice traditionbased practice kpaa mende sierra leone huyse l n salter ed traditional justice reconciliation violent conflict learning african experience stockholm international idea 2008 p 142 n waldorf l mass justice mass atrocity rethinking local justice transitional justice temple law review 79 1 2006 pp 187 n van der mere h lamb g ddr transitional justice south africa case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n part 9 community reconciliation commission reception truth reconciliation east timor p 4 httpwwwictjorgstatictimorcavrenglish09communityreconciliation pdf accessed 12 august 2008", "ProcessedSent": "final report background study available httpwwwswedengovsesbd4890 n van der merwe hugo guy lamb ddr transitional justice south africa ", "SentID": 11573 }, { "ParagraphID": 3209, - "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \\n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \\n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \\n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \\n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \\n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", + "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208351,7 +208351,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3209, - "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \\n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \\n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \\n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \\n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \\n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", + "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208369,7 +208369,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3209, - "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \\n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \\n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \\n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \\n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \\n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", + "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208380,14 +208380,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d.", + "Sentence": "\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d.", "newParagraph": "analysis case study n baptistalundin ira\u00ea peace process mozambique case study ddr transi tional justice new york international center transitional justice n de greiff pablo contributing peace justice finding balance ddr reparation paper presented conference building future peace justice nuremberg germany june 2527 2007 available httpwwwpeacejusticeconferenceinfodocumentsasp n de greiff p ed handbook reparation oxford university international center transitional justice 2006 n king jamesina gender reparation sierra leone wound war remain open happened woman gender reparation human right violation edited ruth rubiomarin new york social science research council international center transitional justice pp 246283 n mayerrieckh alexander preventing abuse vetting transitional form justice prevention vetting public employee transitional society edited alexander mayerrieckh pablo de greiff new york social science research council international center transitional justice 2007 pp 482521 n multicountry demobilization reintegration program resource available http wwwmdrporg n stockholm initiative disarmament demobilisation reintegration stockholm ministry foreign affair sweden 2006 final report background study available httpwwwswedengovsesbd4890 n van der merwe hugo guy lamb ddr transitional justice south africa case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n waldorf lars transitional justice ddr postgenocide rwanda case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n weinstein jeremy macartan humphreys disentangling determinant successful demobilization reintegration working paper 69 washington dc center global development 2005 n alie j reconciliation transitional justice traditionbased practice kpaa mende sierra leone huyse l n salter ed traditional justice reconciliation violent conflict learning african experience stockholm international idea 2008 p 142 n waldorf l mass justice mass atrocity rethinking local justice transitional justice temple law review 79 1 2006 pp 187 n van der mere h lamb g ddr transitional justice south africa case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n part 9 community reconciliation commission reception truth reconciliation east timor p 4 httpwwwictjorgstatictimorcavrenglish09communityreconciliation pdf accessed 12 august 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n waldorf lars transitional justice ddr postgenocide rwanda ", "SentID": 11576 }, { "ParagraphID": 3209, - "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \\n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \\n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \\n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \\n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \\n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", + "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208405,7 +208405,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3209, - "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \\n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \\n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \\n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \\n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \\n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", + "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208423,7 +208423,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3209, - "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \\n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \\n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \\n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \\n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \\n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", + "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208434,14 +208434,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No.", + "Sentence": "\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No.", "newParagraph": "analysis case study n baptistalundin ira\u00ea peace process mozambique case study ddr transi tional justice new york international center transitional justice n de greiff pablo contributing peace justice finding balance ddr reparation paper presented conference building future peace justice nuremberg germany june 2527 2007 available httpwwwpeacejusticeconferenceinfodocumentsasp n de greiff p ed handbook reparation oxford university international center transitional justice 2006 n king jamesina gender reparation sierra leone wound war remain open happened woman gender reparation human right violation edited ruth rubiomarin new york social science research council international center transitional justice pp 246283 n mayerrieckh alexander preventing abuse vetting transitional form justice prevention vetting public employee transitional society edited alexander mayerrieckh pablo de greiff new york social science research council international center transitional justice 2007 pp 482521 n multicountry demobilization reintegration program resource available http wwwmdrporg n stockholm initiative disarmament demobilisation reintegration stockholm ministry foreign affair sweden 2006 final report background study available httpwwwswedengovsesbd4890 n van der merwe hugo guy lamb ddr transitional justice south africa case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n waldorf lars transitional justice ddr postgenocide rwanda case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n weinstein jeremy macartan humphreys disentangling determinant successful demobilization reintegration working paper 69 washington dc center global development 2005 n alie j reconciliation transitional justice traditionbased practice kpaa mende sierra leone huyse l n salter ed traditional justice reconciliation violent conflict learning african experience stockholm international idea 2008 p 142 n waldorf l mass justice mass atrocity rethinking local justice transitional justice temple law review 79 1 2006 pp 187 n van der mere h lamb g ddr transitional justice south africa case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n part 9 community reconciliation commission reception truth reconciliation east timor p 4 httpwwwictjorgstatictimorcavrenglish09communityreconciliation pdf accessed 12 august 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n weinstein jeremy macartan humphreys disentangling determinant successful demobilization reintegration working paper", "SentID": 11579 }, { "ParagraphID": 3209, - "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \\n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \\n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \\n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \\n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \\n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", + "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208459,7 +208459,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3209, - "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \\n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \\n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \\n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \\n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \\n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", + "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208470,14 +208470,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Alie, J.", + "Sentence": "\n Alie, J.", "newParagraph": "analysis case study n baptistalundin ira\u00ea peace process mozambique case study ddr transi tional justice new york international center transitional justice n de greiff pablo contributing peace justice finding balance ddr reparation paper presented conference building future peace justice nuremberg germany june 2527 2007 available httpwwwpeacejusticeconferenceinfodocumentsasp n de greiff p ed handbook reparation oxford university international center transitional justice 2006 n king jamesina gender reparation sierra leone wound war remain open happened woman gender reparation human right violation edited ruth rubiomarin new york social science research council international center transitional justice pp 246283 n mayerrieckh alexander preventing abuse vetting transitional form justice prevention vetting public employee transitional society edited alexander mayerrieckh pablo de greiff new york social science research council international center transitional justice 2007 pp 482521 n multicountry demobilization reintegration program resource available http wwwmdrporg n stockholm initiative disarmament demobilisation reintegration stockholm ministry foreign affair sweden 2006 final report background study available httpwwwswedengovsesbd4890 n van der merwe hugo guy lamb ddr transitional justice south africa case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n waldorf lars transitional justice ddr postgenocide rwanda case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n weinstein jeremy macartan humphreys disentangling determinant successful demobilization reintegration working paper 69 washington dc center global development 2005 n alie j reconciliation transitional justice traditionbased practice kpaa mende sierra leone huyse l n salter ed traditional justice reconciliation violent conflict learning african experience stockholm international idea 2008 p 142 n waldorf l mass justice mass atrocity rethinking local justice transitional justice temple law review 79 1 2006 pp 187 n van der mere h lamb g ddr transitional justice south africa case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n part 9 community reconciliation commission reception truth reconciliation east timor p 4 httpwwwictjorgstatictimorcavrenglish09communityreconciliation pdf accessed 12 august 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n alie j", "SentID": 11581 }, { "ParagraphID": 3209, - "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \\n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \\n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \\n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \\n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \\n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", + "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208488,14 +208488,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \\n Salter, M.", + "Sentence": "\u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \n Salter, M.", "newParagraph": "analysis case study n baptistalundin ira\u00ea peace process mozambique case study ddr transi tional justice new york international center transitional justice n de greiff pablo contributing peace justice finding balance ddr reparation paper presented conference building future peace justice nuremberg germany june 2527 2007 available httpwwwpeacejusticeconferenceinfodocumentsasp n de greiff p ed handbook reparation oxford university international center transitional justice 2006 n king jamesina gender reparation sierra leone wound war remain open happened woman gender reparation human right violation edited ruth rubiomarin new york social science research council international center transitional justice pp 246283 n mayerrieckh alexander preventing abuse vetting transitional form justice prevention vetting public employee transitional society edited alexander mayerrieckh pablo de greiff new york social science research council international center transitional justice 2007 pp 482521 n multicountry demobilization reintegration program resource available http wwwmdrporg n stockholm initiative disarmament demobilisation reintegration stockholm ministry foreign affair sweden 2006 final report background study available httpwwwswedengovsesbd4890 n van der merwe hugo guy lamb ddr transitional justice south africa case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n waldorf lars transitional justice ddr postgenocide rwanda case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n weinstein jeremy macartan humphreys disentangling determinant successful demobilization reintegration working paper 69 washington dc center global development 2005 n alie j reconciliation transitional justice traditionbased practice kpaa mende sierra leone huyse l n salter ed traditional justice reconciliation violent conflict learning african experience stockholm international idea 2008 p 142 n waldorf l mass justice mass atrocity rethinking local justice transitional justice temple law review 79 1 2006 pp 187 n van der mere h lamb g ddr transitional justice south africa case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n part 9 community reconciliation commission reception truth reconciliation east timor p 4 httpwwwictjorgstatictimorcavrenglish09communityreconciliation pdf accessed 12 august 2008", "ProcessedSent": " reconciliation transitional justice traditionbased practice kpaa mende sierra leone huyse l n salter", "SentID": 11582 }, { "ParagraphID": 3209, - "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \\n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \\n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \\n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \\n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \\n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", + "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208513,7 +208513,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3209, - "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \\n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \\n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \\n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \\n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \\n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", + "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208531,7 +208531,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3209, - "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \\n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \\n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \\n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \\n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \\n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", + "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208542,14 +208542,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no.", + "Sentence": "\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no.", "newParagraph": "analysis case study n baptistalundin ira\u00ea peace process mozambique case study ddr transi tional justice new york international center transitional justice n de greiff pablo contributing peace justice finding balance ddr reparation paper presented conference building future peace justice nuremberg germany june 2527 2007 available httpwwwpeacejusticeconferenceinfodocumentsasp n de greiff p ed handbook reparation oxford university international center transitional justice 2006 n king jamesina gender reparation sierra leone wound war remain open happened woman gender reparation human right violation edited ruth rubiomarin new york social science research council international center transitional justice pp 246283 n mayerrieckh alexander preventing abuse vetting transitional form justice prevention vetting public employee transitional society edited alexander mayerrieckh pablo de greiff new york social science research council international center transitional justice 2007 pp 482521 n multicountry demobilization reintegration program resource available http wwwmdrporg n stockholm initiative disarmament demobilisation reintegration stockholm ministry foreign affair sweden 2006 final report background study available httpwwwswedengovsesbd4890 n van der merwe hugo guy lamb ddr transitional justice south africa case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n waldorf lars transitional justice ddr postgenocide rwanda case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n weinstein jeremy macartan humphreys disentangling determinant successful demobilization reintegration working paper 69 washington dc center global development 2005 n alie j reconciliation transitional justice traditionbased practice kpaa mende sierra leone huyse l n salter ed traditional justice reconciliation violent conflict learning african experience stockholm international idea 2008 p 142 n waldorf l mass justice mass atrocity rethinking local justice transitional justice temple law review 79 1 2006 pp 187 n van der mere h lamb g ddr transitional justice south africa case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n part 9 community reconciliation commission reception truth reconciliation east timor p 4 httpwwwictjorgstatictimorcavrenglish09communityreconciliation pdf accessed 12 august 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n waldorf l mass justice mass atrocity rethinking local justice transitional justice temple law review 79", "SentID": 11585 }, { "ParagraphID": 3209, - "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \\n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \\n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \\n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \\n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \\n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", + "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208567,7 +208567,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3209, - "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \\n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \\n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \\n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \\n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \\n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", + "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208585,7 +208585,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3209, - "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \\n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \\n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \\n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \\n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \\n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", + "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208596,14 +208596,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming).", + "Sentence": "\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming).", "newParagraph": "analysis case study n baptistalundin ira\u00ea peace process mozambique case study ddr transi tional justice new york international center transitional justice n de greiff pablo contributing peace justice finding balance ddr reparation paper presented conference building future peace justice nuremberg germany june 2527 2007 available httpwwwpeacejusticeconferenceinfodocumentsasp n de greiff p ed handbook reparation oxford university international center transitional justice 2006 n king jamesina gender reparation sierra leone wound war remain open happened woman gender reparation human right violation edited ruth rubiomarin new york social science research council international center transitional justice pp 246283 n mayerrieckh alexander preventing abuse vetting transitional form justice prevention vetting public employee transitional society edited alexander mayerrieckh pablo de greiff new york social science research council international center transitional justice 2007 pp 482521 n multicountry demobilization reintegration program resource available http wwwmdrporg n stockholm initiative disarmament demobilisation reintegration stockholm ministry foreign affair sweden 2006 final report background study available httpwwwswedengovsesbd4890 n van der merwe hugo guy lamb ddr transitional justice south africa case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n waldorf lars transitional justice ddr postgenocide rwanda case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n weinstein jeremy macartan humphreys disentangling determinant successful demobilization reintegration working paper 69 washington dc center global development 2005 n alie j reconciliation transitional justice traditionbased practice kpaa mende sierra leone huyse l n salter ed traditional justice reconciliation violent conflict learning african experience stockholm international idea 2008 p 142 n waldorf l mass justice mass atrocity rethinking local justice transitional justice temple law review 79 1 2006 pp 187 n van der mere h lamb g ddr transitional justice south africa case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n part 9 community reconciliation commission reception truth reconciliation east timor p 4 httpwwwictjorgstatictimorcavrenglish09communityreconciliation pdf accessed 12 august 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n van der mere h lamb g ddr transitional justice south africa case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming", "SentID": 11588 }, { "ParagraphID": 3209, - "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \\n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \\n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \\n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \\n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \\n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", + "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208614,14 +208614,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation.", + "Sentence": "\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation.", "newParagraph": "analysis case study n baptistalundin ira\u00ea peace process mozambique case study ddr transi tional justice new york international center transitional justice n de greiff pablo contributing peace justice finding balance ddr reparation paper presented conference building future peace justice nuremberg germany june 2527 2007 available httpwwwpeacejusticeconferenceinfodocumentsasp n de greiff p ed handbook reparation oxford university international center transitional justice 2006 n king jamesina gender reparation sierra leone wound war remain open happened woman gender reparation human right violation edited ruth rubiomarin new york social science research council international center transitional justice pp 246283 n mayerrieckh alexander preventing abuse vetting transitional form justice prevention vetting public employee transitional society edited alexander mayerrieckh pablo de greiff new york social science research council international center transitional justice 2007 pp 482521 n multicountry demobilization reintegration program resource available http wwwmdrporg n stockholm initiative disarmament demobilisation reintegration stockholm ministry foreign affair sweden 2006 final report background study available httpwwwswedengovsesbd4890 n van der merwe hugo guy lamb ddr transitional justice south africa case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n waldorf lars transitional justice ddr postgenocide rwanda case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n weinstein jeremy macartan humphreys disentangling determinant successful demobilization reintegration working paper 69 washington dc center global development 2005 n alie j reconciliation transitional justice traditionbased practice kpaa mende sierra leone huyse l n salter ed traditional justice reconciliation violent conflict learning african experience stockholm international idea 2008 p 142 n waldorf l mass justice mass atrocity rethinking local justice transitional justice temple law review 79 1 2006 pp 187 n van der mere h lamb g ddr transitional justice south africa case study ddr transitional justice new york international center transitional justice forthcoming n part 9 community reconciliation commission reception truth reconciliation east timor p 4 httpwwwictjorgstatictimorcavrenglish09communityreconciliation pdf accessed 12 august 2008", "ProcessedSent": "n part 9 community reconciliation commission reception truth reconciliation east timor p 4 httpwwwictjorgstatictimorcavrenglish09communityreconciliation", "SentID": 11589 }, { "ParagraphID": 3209, - "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \\n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \\n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \\n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \\n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \\n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \\n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \\n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \\n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \\n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \\n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \\n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \\n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \\n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \\n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", + "Paragraph": "Analysis and Case Studies \n Baptista-Lundin, Ira\u00ea, \u201cPeace Process in Mozambique\u201d. A case study on DDR and transi- tional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. \n de Greiff, Pablo, \u201cContributing to Peace and Justice\u2014Finding a Balance Between DDR and Reparations\u201d, a paper presented at the conference Building a Future on Peace and Justice, Nuremberg, Germany (June 25-27, 2007). Available at http:\/\/www.peace-justice-conference.info\/documents.asp \n De Greiff, P. (ed.), The Handbook for Reparations, (Oxford University and The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2006) \n King, Jamesina, \u201cGender and Reparations in Sierra Leone: The Wounds of War Remain Open\u201d in What Happened to the Women: Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations, edited by Ruth Rubio-Marin. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, pp. 246-283. \n Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander, \u201cOn Preventing Abuse: Vetting and Other Transitional Re- forms\u201d in Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies, edited by Alexander Mayer-Rieckh and Pablo de Greiff. New York: Social Science Research Council \/ International Center for Transitional Justice, 2007, pp. 482-521. \n Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Program resources available at http:\/\/ www.mdrp.org. \n Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilisation Reintegration, Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, 2006. Final Report and Background Studies available at http:\/\/www.sweden.gov.se\/sb\/d\/4890 \n van der Merwe, Hugo and Guy Lamb, \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Waldorf, Lars, \u201cTransitional Justice and DDR in Post-Genocide Rwanda\u201d. A case study on DDR and transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming. \n Weinstein, Jeremy and Macartan Humphreys, Disentangling the Determinants of Successful Demobilization and Reintegration, Working Paper No. 69, Washington DC: Center for Global Development, 2005. \n Alie, J. \u201cReconciliation and transitional justice: Tradition-based practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone,\u201d in Huyse, L. and \n Salter, M. (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2008), p. 142. \n Waldorf, L. \u201cMass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice\u201d, Temple Law Review 79, no. 1 (2006): pp. 1-87. \n van der Mere, H. and Lamb, G., \u201cDDR and Transitional Justice in South Africa\u201d, a case study on DDR and transitional justice (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, forthcoming). \n \u201cPart 9: Community Reconciliation\u201d, in Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, p. 4, http:\/\/www.ictj.org\/static\/Timor.CAVR.English\/09-Community-Reconciliation. pdf (accessed on 12 August 2008).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208639,7 +208639,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208657,7 +208657,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208675,7 +208675,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208686,14 +208686,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights.", + "Sentence": "\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights.", "newParagraph": "1 united nation security council report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2004616 n 2 formally defined generally assumed genocide slavery slave trade extra judicial summary arbitrary execution enforces disappearance torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment prolonged arbitrary detention deportation forcible trans fer population systematic racial discrimination fall category gross violation human right deliberate systematic deprivation essential foodstuff essential primary health care basic shelter housing may also amount gross violation human right n 3 security council resolution 1856 2 december 2008 un doc sres1856 n 4 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 5 1948 convention prevention punishment crime genocide international covenant civil political right 1984 convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment international convention protection per son enforced disappearance geneva convention 1949 1977 protocol additional noi geneva convention 12 august 1949 protocol additional noii n 6 un document ecn42005102add1 n 7 un document ares60147 n 8 united nation commission human right updated set principle protection promo tion human right action combat impunity hereafter updated set principle principle 32 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102ad1 n 9 un document s2004616 n 10 see updated principle principle 24 n 11 un document s2004616 n 12 rome statute international criminal court see preamble article 17 n 13 mary robinson foreword princeton principle universal jurisdiction princeton univer sity press princeton 2001 p 16 n 14 united nation general assembly 16 december 2005 un doc ares60147 n 15 ibid principle 15 n 16 ibid principle 16 n 17 ibid principle 19 n 18 see united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also principle 36 c e according civilian control military security force well intelligence agency must ensured necessary established restored end state establish effective institution civilian oversight military security force intelligence agency including legislative oversight body public official employee particular involved military security police intelligence judicial sector ceive comprehensive ongoing training human right applicable humanitarian law standard implementation standard n 19 vetting process aim exclude person serious integrity deficit public service important aspect institutional reform country transition united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also n 20 ohchr tool vetting page 4 n 21 updated set principle impunity principle 36 n 22 iddrs operation programme support social economic reintegration united nation new york august 2006 410 n 23 united nation secretarygeneral bulletin 6 august 1999 un doc stsgb199913 n 24 ibid p 2 n 25 pigou pier community reconciliation process commission reception truth reconciliation undp timorleste dili april 2004 n 26 multicountry demobilization reintegration program rwanda httpwwwmdrporgrwanda htm accessed 9 july 2008 n 27 united nation security council report secretary general securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform 23 january 2008 un doc a62659 s200839 n 28 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 29 paris principle 36 n 30 crc article 39 optional protocol convention right child involvement child armed conflict article 6 n 31 un guideline justice matter involving child victim witness crime n 32 protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim noninternational armed conflict protocol ii article 6 5", "ProcessedSent": "n 2 formally defined generally assumed genocide slavery slave trade extra judicial summary arbitrary execution enforces disappearance torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment prolonged arbitrary detention deportation forcible trans fer population systematic racial discrimination fall category gross violation human right", "SentID": 11593 }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208711,7 +208711,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208722,14 +208722,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc.", + "Sentence": "\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc.", "newParagraph": "1 united nation security council report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2004616 n 2 formally defined generally assumed genocide slavery slave trade extra judicial summary arbitrary execution enforces disappearance torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment prolonged arbitrary detention deportation forcible trans fer population systematic racial discrimination fall category gross violation human right deliberate systematic deprivation essential foodstuff essential primary health care basic shelter housing may also amount gross violation human right n 3 security council resolution 1856 2 december 2008 un doc sres1856 n 4 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 5 1948 convention prevention punishment crime genocide international covenant civil political right 1984 convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment international convention protection per son enforced disappearance geneva convention 1949 1977 protocol additional noi geneva convention 12 august 1949 protocol additional noii n 6 un document ecn42005102add1 n 7 un document ares60147 n 8 united nation commission human right updated set principle protection promo tion human right action combat impunity hereafter updated set principle principle 32 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102ad1 n 9 un document s2004616 n 10 see updated principle principle 24 n 11 un document s2004616 n 12 rome statute international criminal court see preamble article 17 n 13 mary robinson foreword princeton principle universal jurisdiction princeton univer sity press princeton 2001 p 16 n 14 united nation general assembly 16 december 2005 un doc ares60147 n 15 ibid principle 15 n 16 ibid principle 16 n 17 ibid principle 19 n 18 see united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also principle 36 c e according civilian control military security force well intelligence agency must ensured necessary established restored end state establish effective institution civilian oversight military security force intelligence agency including legislative oversight body public official employee particular involved military security police intelligence judicial sector ceive comprehensive ongoing training human right applicable humanitarian law standard implementation standard n 19 vetting process aim exclude person serious integrity deficit public service important aspect institutional reform country transition united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also n 20 ohchr tool vetting page 4 n 21 updated set principle impunity principle 36 n 22 iddrs operation programme support social economic reintegration united nation new york august 2006 410 n 23 united nation secretarygeneral bulletin 6 august 1999 un doc stsgb199913 n 24 ibid p 2 n 25 pigou pier community reconciliation process commission reception truth reconciliation undp timorleste dili april 2004 n 26 multicountry demobilization reintegration program rwanda httpwwwmdrporgrwanda htm accessed 9 july 2008 n 27 united nation security council report secretary general securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform 23 january 2008 un doc a62659 s200839 n 28 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 29 paris principle 36 n 30 crc article 39 optional protocol convention right child involvement child armed conflict article 6 n 31 un guideline justice matter involving child victim witness crime n 32 protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim noninternational armed conflict protocol ii article 6 5", "ProcessedSent": "n 3 security council resolution 1856 2 december 2008 un doc", "SentID": 11595 }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208740,14 +208740,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General.", + "Sentence": "S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General.", "newParagraph": "1 united nation security council report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2004616 n 2 formally defined generally assumed genocide slavery slave trade extra judicial summary arbitrary execution enforces disappearance torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment prolonged arbitrary detention deportation forcible trans fer population systematic racial discrimination fall category gross violation human right deliberate systematic deprivation essential foodstuff essential primary health care basic shelter housing may also amount gross violation human right n 3 security council resolution 1856 2 december 2008 un doc sres1856 n 4 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 5 1948 convention prevention punishment crime genocide international covenant civil political right 1984 convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment international convention protection per son enforced disappearance geneva convention 1949 1977 protocol additional noi geneva convention 12 august 1949 protocol additional noii n 6 un document ecn42005102add1 n 7 un document ares60147 n 8 united nation commission human right updated set principle protection promo tion human right action combat impunity hereafter updated set principle principle 32 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102ad1 n 9 un document s2004616 n 10 see updated principle principle 24 n 11 un document s2004616 n 12 rome statute international criminal court see preamble article 17 n 13 mary robinson foreword princeton principle universal jurisdiction princeton univer sity press princeton 2001 p 16 n 14 united nation general assembly 16 december 2005 un doc ares60147 n 15 ibid principle 15 n 16 ibid principle 16 n 17 ibid principle 19 n 18 see united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also principle 36 c e according civilian control military security force well intelligence agency must ensured necessary established restored end state establish effective institution civilian oversight military security force intelligence agency including legislative oversight body public official employee particular involved military security police intelligence judicial sector ceive comprehensive ongoing training human right applicable humanitarian law standard implementation standard n 19 vetting process aim exclude person serious integrity deficit public service important aspect institutional reform country transition united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also n 20 ohchr tool vetting page 4 n 21 updated set principle impunity principle 36 n 22 iddrs operation programme support social economic reintegration united nation new york august 2006 410 n 23 united nation secretarygeneral bulletin 6 august 1999 un doc stsgb199913 n 24 ibid p 2 n 25 pigou pier community reconciliation process commission reception truth reconciliation undp timorleste dili april 2004 n 26 multicountry demobilization reintegration program rwanda httpwwwmdrporgrwanda htm accessed 9 july 2008 n 27 united nation security council report secretary general securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform 23 january 2008 un doc a62659 s200839 n 28 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 29 paris principle 36 n 30 crc article 39 optional protocol convention right child involvement child armed conflict article 6 n 31 un guideline justice matter involving child victim witness crime n 32 protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim noninternational armed conflict protocol ii article 6 5", "ProcessedSent": "sres1856 n 4 united nation security council report secretarygeneral", "SentID": 11596 }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208758,14 +208758,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II).", + "Sentence": "\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II).", "newParagraph": "1 united nation security council report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2004616 n 2 formally defined generally assumed genocide slavery slave trade extra judicial summary arbitrary execution enforces disappearance torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment prolonged arbitrary detention deportation forcible trans fer population systematic racial discrimination fall category gross violation human right deliberate systematic deprivation essential foodstuff essential primary health care basic shelter housing may also amount gross violation human right n 3 security council resolution 1856 2 december 2008 un doc sres1856 n 4 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 5 1948 convention prevention punishment crime genocide international covenant civil political right 1984 convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment international convention protection per son enforced disappearance geneva convention 1949 1977 protocol additional noi geneva convention 12 august 1949 protocol additional noii n 6 un document ecn42005102add1 n 7 un document ares60147 n 8 united nation commission human right updated set principle protection promo tion human right action combat impunity hereafter updated set principle principle 32 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102ad1 n 9 un document s2004616 n 10 see updated principle principle 24 n 11 un document s2004616 n 12 rome statute international criminal court see preamble article 17 n 13 mary robinson foreword princeton principle universal jurisdiction princeton univer sity press princeton 2001 p 16 n 14 united nation general assembly 16 december 2005 un doc ares60147 n 15 ibid principle 15 n 16 ibid principle 16 n 17 ibid principle 19 n 18 see united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also principle 36 c e according civilian control military security force well intelligence agency must ensured necessary established restored end state establish effective institution civilian oversight military security force intelligence agency including legislative oversight body public official employee particular involved military security police intelligence judicial sector ceive comprehensive ongoing training human right applicable humanitarian law standard implementation standard n 19 vetting process aim exclude person serious integrity deficit public service important aspect institutional reform country transition united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also n 20 ohchr tool vetting page 4 n 21 updated set principle impunity principle 36 n 22 iddrs operation programme support social economic reintegration united nation new york august 2006 410 n 23 united nation secretarygeneral bulletin 6 august 1999 un doc stsgb199913 n 24 ibid p 2 n 25 pigou pier community reconciliation process commission reception truth reconciliation undp timorleste dili april 2004 n 26 multicountry demobilization reintegration program rwanda httpwwwmdrporgrwanda htm accessed 9 july 2008 n 27 united nation security council report secretary general securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform 23 january 2008 un doc a62659 s200839 n 28 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 29 paris principle 36 n 30 crc article 39 optional protocol convention right child involvement child armed conflict article 6 n 31 un guideline justice matter involving child victim witness crime n 32 protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim noninternational armed conflict protocol ii article 6 5", "ProcessedSent": "n 5 1948 convention prevention punishment crime genocide international covenant civil political right 1984 convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment international convention protection per son enforced disappearance geneva convention 1949 1977 protocol additional noi geneva convention 12 august 1949 protocol additional noii", "SentID": 11597 }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208776,14 +208776,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1.", + "Sentence": "\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1.", "newParagraph": "1 united nation security council report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2004616 n 2 formally defined generally assumed genocide slavery slave trade extra judicial summary arbitrary execution enforces disappearance torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment prolonged arbitrary detention deportation forcible trans fer population systematic racial discrimination fall category gross violation human right deliberate systematic deprivation essential foodstuff essential primary health care basic shelter housing may also amount gross violation human right n 3 security council resolution 1856 2 december 2008 un doc sres1856 n 4 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 5 1948 convention prevention punishment crime genocide international covenant civil political right 1984 convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment international convention protection per son enforced disappearance geneva convention 1949 1977 protocol additional noi geneva convention 12 august 1949 protocol additional noii n 6 un document ecn42005102add1 n 7 un document ares60147 n 8 united nation commission human right updated set principle protection promo tion human right action combat impunity hereafter updated set principle principle 32 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102ad1 n 9 un document s2004616 n 10 see updated principle principle 24 n 11 un document s2004616 n 12 rome statute international criminal court see preamble article 17 n 13 mary robinson foreword princeton principle universal jurisdiction princeton univer sity press princeton 2001 p 16 n 14 united nation general assembly 16 december 2005 un doc ares60147 n 15 ibid principle 15 n 16 ibid principle 16 n 17 ibid principle 19 n 18 see united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also principle 36 c e according civilian control military security force well intelligence agency must ensured necessary established restored end state establish effective institution civilian oversight military security force intelligence agency including legislative oversight body public official employee particular involved military security police intelligence judicial sector ceive comprehensive ongoing training human right applicable humanitarian law standard implementation standard n 19 vetting process aim exclude person serious integrity deficit public service important aspect institutional reform country transition united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also n 20 ohchr tool vetting page 4 n 21 updated set principle impunity principle 36 n 22 iddrs operation programme support social economic reintegration united nation new york august 2006 410 n 23 united nation secretarygeneral bulletin 6 august 1999 un doc stsgb199913 n 24 ibid p 2 n 25 pigou pier community reconciliation process commission reception truth reconciliation undp timorleste dili april 2004 n 26 multicountry demobilization reintegration program rwanda httpwwwmdrporgrwanda htm accessed 9 july 2008 n 27 united nation security council report secretary general securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform 23 january 2008 un doc a62659 s200839 n 28 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 29 paris principle 36 n 30 crc article 39 optional protocol convention right child involvement child armed conflict article 6 n 31 un guideline justice matter involving child victim witness crime n 32 protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim noninternational armed conflict protocol ii article 6 5", "ProcessedSent": "n 6 un document ecn42005102add1", "SentID": 11598 }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208794,14 +208794,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147.", + "Sentence": "\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147.", "newParagraph": "1 united nation security council report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2004616 n 2 formally defined generally assumed genocide slavery slave trade extra judicial summary arbitrary execution enforces disappearance torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment prolonged arbitrary detention deportation forcible trans fer population systematic racial discrimination fall category gross violation human right deliberate systematic deprivation essential foodstuff essential primary health care basic shelter housing may also amount gross violation human right n 3 security council resolution 1856 2 december 2008 un doc sres1856 n 4 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 5 1948 convention prevention punishment crime genocide international covenant civil political right 1984 convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment international convention protection per son enforced disappearance geneva convention 1949 1977 protocol additional noi geneva convention 12 august 1949 protocol additional noii n 6 un document ecn42005102add1 n 7 un document ares60147 n 8 united nation commission human right updated set principle protection promo tion human right action combat impunity hereafter updated set principle principle 32 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102ad1 n 9 un document s2004616 n 10 see updated principle principle 24 n 11 un document s2004616 n 12 rome statute international criminal court see preamble article 17 n 13 mary robinson foreword princeton principle universal jurisdiction princeton univer sity press princeton 2001 p 16 n 14 united nation general assembly 16 december 2005 un doc ares60147 n 15 ibid principle 15 n 16 ibid principle 16 n 17 ibid principle 19 n 18 see united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also principle 36 c e according civilian control military security force well intelligence agency must ensured necessary established restored end state establish effective institution civilian oversight military security force intelligence agency including legislative oversight body public official employee particular involved military security police intelligence judicial sector ceive comprehensive ongoing training human right applicable humanitarian law standard implementation standard n 19 vetting process aim exclude person serious integrity deficit public service important aspect institutional reform country transition united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also n 20 ohchr tool vetting page 4 n 21 updated set principle impunity principle 36 n 22 iddrs operation programme support social economic reintegration united nation new york august 2006 410 n 23 united nation secretarygeneral bulletin 6 august 1999 un doc stsgb199913 n 24 ibid p 2 n 25 pigou pier community reconciliation process commission reception truth reconciliation undp timorleste dili april 2004 n 26 multicountry demobilization reintegration program rwanda httpwwwmdrporgrwanda htm accessed 9 july 2008 n 27 united nation security council report secretary general securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform 23 january 2008 un doc a62659 s200839 n 28 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 29 paris principle 36 n 30 crc article 39 optional protocol convention right child involvement child armed conflict article 6 n 31 un guideline justice matter involving child victim witness crime n 32 protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim noninternational armed conflict protocol ii article 6 5", "ProcessedSent": "n 7 un document ares60147", "SentID": 11599 }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208812,14 +208812,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc.", + "Sentence": "\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc.", "newParagraph": "1 united nation security council report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2004616 n 2 formally defined generally assumed genocide slavery slave trade extra judicial summary arbitrary execution enforces disappearance torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment prolonged arbitrary detention deportation forcible trans fer population systematic racial discrimination fall category gross violation human right deliberate systematic deprivation essential foodstuff essential primary health care basic shelter housing may also amount gross violation human right n 3 security council resolution 1856 2 december 2008 un doc sres1856 n 4 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 5 1948 convention prevention punishment crime genocide international covenant civil political right 1984 convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment international convention protection per son enforced disappearance geneva convention 1949 1977 protocol additional noi geneva convention 12 august 1949 protocol additional noii n 6 un document ecn42005102add1 n 7 un document ares60147 n 8 united nation commission human right updated set principle protection promo tion human right action combat impunity hereafter updated set principle principle 32 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102ad1 n 9 un document s2004616 n 10 see updated principle principle 24 n 11 un document s2004616 n 12 rome statute international criminal court see preamble article 17 n 13 mary robinson foreword princeton principle universal jurisdiction princeton univer sity press princeton 2001 p 16 n 14 united nation general assembly 16 december 2005 un doc ares60147 n 15 ibid principle 15 n 16 ibid principle 16 n 17 ibid principle 19 n 18 see united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also principle 36 c e according civilian control military security force well intelligence agency must ensured necessary established restored end state establish effective institution civilian oversight military security force intelligence agency including legislative oversight body public official employee particular involved military security police intelligence judicial sector ceive comprehensive ongoing training human right applicable humanitarian law standard implementation standard n 19 vetting process aim exclude person serious integrity deficit public service important aspect institutional reform country transition united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also n 20 ohchr tool vetting page 4 n 21 updated set principle impunity principle 36 n 22 iddrs operation programme support social economic reintegration united nation new york august 2006 410 n 23 united nation secretarygeneral bulletin 6 august 1999 un doc stsgb199913 n 24 ibid p 2 n 25 pigou pier community reconciliation process commission reception truth reconciliation undp timorleste dili april 2004 n 26 multicountry demobilization reintegration program rwanda httpwwwmdrporgrwanda htm accessed 9 july 2008 n 27 united nation security council report secretary general securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform 23 january 2008 un doc a62659 s200839 n 28 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 29 paris principle 36 n 30 crc article 39 optional protocol convention right child involvement child armed conflict article 6 n 31 un guideline justice matter involving child victim witness crime n 32 protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim noninternational armed conflict protocol ii article 6 5", "ProcessedSent": "n 8 united nation commission human right updated set principle protection promo tion human right action combat impunity hereafter updated set principle principle 32 8 february 2005 un doc", "SentID": 11600 }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208837,7 +208837,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208848,14 +208848,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616.", + "Sentence": "\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616.", "newParagraph": "1 united nation security council report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2004616 n 2 formally defined generally assumed genocide slavery slave trade extra judicial summary arbitrary execution enforces disappearance torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment prolonged arbitrary detention deportation forcible trans fer population systematic racial discrimination fall category gross violation human right deliberate systematic deprivation essential foodstuff essential primary health care basic shelter housing may also amount gross violation human right n 3 security council resolution 1856 2 december 2008 un doc sres1856 n 4 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 5 1948 convention prevention punishment crime genocide international covenant civil political right 1984 convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment international convention protection per son enforced disappearance geneva convention 1949 1977 protocol additional noi geneva convention 12 august 1949 protocol additional noii n 6 un document ecn42005102add1 n 7 un document ares60147 n 8 united nation commission human right updated set principle protection promo tion human right action combat impunity hereafter updated set principle principle 32 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102ad1 n 9 un document s2004616 n 10 see updated principle principle 24 n 11 un document s2004616 n 12 rome statute international criminal court see preamble article 17 n 13 mary robinson foreword princeton principle universal jurisdiction princeton univer sity press princeton 2001 p 16 n 14 united nation general assembly 16 december 2005 un doc ares60147 n 15 ibid principle 15 n 16 ibid principle 16 n 17 ibid principle 19 n 18 see united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also principle 36 c e according civilian control military security force well intelligence agency must ensured necessary established restored end state establish effective institution civilian oversight military security force intelligence agency including legislative oversight body public official employee particular involved military security police intelligence judicial sector ceive comprehensive ongoing training human right applicable humanitarian law standard implementation standard n 19 vetting process aim exclude person serious integrity deficit public service important aspect institutional reform country transition united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also n 20 ohchr tool vetting page 4 n 21 updated set principle impunity principle 36 n 22 iddrs operation programme support social economic reintegration united nation new york august 2006 410 n 23 united nation secretarygeneral bulletin 6 august 1999 un doc stsgb199913 n 24 ibid p 2 n 25 pigou pier community reconciliation process commission reception truth reconciliation undp timorleste dili april 2004 n 26 multicountry demobilization reintegration program rwanda httpwwwmdrporgrwanda htm accessed 9 july 2008 n 27 united nation security council report secretary general securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform 23 january 2008 un doc a62659 s200839 n 28 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 29 paris principle 36 n 30 crc article 39 optional protocol convention right child involvement child armed conflict article 6 n 31 un guideline justice matter involving child victim witness crime n 32 protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim noninternational armed conflict protocol ii article 6 5", "ProcessedSent": "n 9 un document s2004616", "SentID": 11602 }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208866,14 +208866,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24.", + "Sentence": "\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24.", "newParagraph": "1 united nation security council report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2004616 n 2 formally defined generally assumed genocide slavery slave trade extra judicial summary arbitrary execution enforces disappearance torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment prolonged arbitrary detention deportation forcible trans fer population systematic racial discrimination fall category gross violation human right deliberate systematic deprivation essential foodstuff essential primary health care basic shelter housing may also amount gross violation human right n 3 security council resolution 1856 2 december 2008 un doc sres1856 n 4 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 5 1948 convention prevention punishment crime genocide international covenant civil political right 1984 convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment international convention protection per son enforced disappearance geneva convention 1949 1977 protocol additional noi geneva convention 12 august 1949 protocol additional noii n 6 un document ecn42005102add1 n 7 un document ares60147 n 8 united nation commission human right updated set principle protection promo tion human right action combat impunity hereafter updated set principle principle 32 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102ad1 n 9 un document s2004616 n 10 see updated principle principle 24 n 11 un document s2004616 n 12 rome statute international criminal court see preamble article 17 n 13 mary robinson foreword princeton principle universal jurisdiction princeton univer sity press princeton 2001 p 16 n 14 united nation general assembly 16 december 2005 un doc ares60147 n 15 ibid principle 15 n 16 ibid principle 16 n 17 ibid principle 19 n 18 see united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also principle 36 c e according civilian control military security force well intelligence agency must ensured necessary established restored end state establish effective institution civilian oversight military security force intelligence agency including legislative oversight body public official employee particular involved military security police intelligence judicial sector ceive comprehensive ongoing training human right applicable humanitarian law standard implementation standard n 19 vetting process aim exclude person serious integrity deficit public service important aspect institutional reform country transition united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also n 20 ohchr tool vetting page 4 n 21 updated set principle impunity principle 36 n 22 iddrs operation programme support social economic reintegration united nation new york august 2006 410 n 23 united nation secretarygeneral bulletin 6 august 1999 un doc stsgb199913 n 24 ibid p 2 n 25 pigou pier community reconciliation process commission reception truth reconciliation undp timorleste dili april 2004 n 26 multicountry demobilization reintegration program rwanda httpwwwmdrporgrwanda htm accessed 9 july 2008 n 27 united nation security council report secretary general securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform 23 january 2008 un doc a62659 s200839 n 28 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 29 paris principle 36 n 30 crc article 39 optional protocol convention right child involvement child armed conflict article 6 n 31 un guideline justice matter involving child victim witness crime n 32 protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim noninternational armed conflict protocol ii article 6 5", "ProcessedSent": "n 10 see updated principle principle 24", "SentID": 11603 }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208884,14 +208884,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17.", + "Sentence": "\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17.", "newParagraph": "1 united nation security council report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2004616 n 2 formally defined generally assumed genocide slavery slave trade extra judicial summary arbitrary execution enforces disappearance torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment prolonged arbitrary detention deportation forcible trans fer population systematic racial discrimination fall category gross violation human right deliberate systematic deprivation essential foodstuff essential primary health care basic shelter housing may also amount gross violation human right n 3 security council resolution 1856 2 december 2008 un doc sres1856 n 4 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 5 1948 convention prevention punishment crime genocide international covenant civil political right 1984 convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment international convention protection per son enforced disappearance geneva convention 1949 1977 protocol additional noi geneva convention 12 august 1949 protocol additional noii n 6 un document ecn42005102add1 n 7 un document ares60147 n 8 united nation commission human right updated set principle protection promo tion human right action combat impunity hereafter updated set principle principle 32 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102ad1 n 9 un document s2004616 n 10 see updated principle principle 24 n 11 un document s2004616 n 12 rome statute international criminal court see preamble article 17 n 13 mary robinson foreword princeton principle universal jurisdiction princeton univer sity press princeton 2001 p 16 n 14 united nation general assembly 16 december 2005 un doc ares60147 n 15 ibid principle 15 n 16 ibid principle 16 n 17 ibid principle 19 n 18 see united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also principle 36 c e according civilian control military security force well intelligence agency must ensured necessary established restored end state establish effective institution civilian oversight military security force intelligence agency including legislative oversight body public official employee particular involved military security police intelligence judicial sector ceive comprehensive ongoing training human right applicable humanitarian law standard implementation standard n 19 vetting process aim exclude person serious integrity deficit public service important aspect institutional reform country transition united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also n 20 ohchr tool vetting page 4 n 21 updated set principle impunity principle 36 n 22 iddrs operation programme support social economic reintegration united nation new york august 2006 410 n 23 united nation secretarygeneral bulletin 6 august 1999 un doc stsgb199913 n 24 ibid p 2 n 25 pigou pier community reconciliation process commission reception truth reconciliation undp timorleste dili april 2004 n 26 multicountry demobilization reintegration program rwanda httpwwwmdrporgrwanda htm accessed 9 july 2008 n 27 united nation security council report secretary general securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform 23 january 2008 un doc a62659 s200839 n 28 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 29 paris principle 36 n 30 crc article 39 optional protocol convention right child involvement child armed conflict article 6 n 31 un guideline justice matter involving child victim witness crime n 32 protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim noninternational armed conflict protocol ii article 6 5", "ProcessedSent": "n 11 un document s2004616 n 12 rome statute international criminal court see preamble article 17", "SentID": 11604 }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208902,14 +208902,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16.", + "Sentence": "\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16.", "newParagraph": "1 united nation security council report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2004616 n 2 formally defined generally assumed genocide slavery slave trade extra judicial summary arbitrary execution enforces disappearance torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment prolonged arbitrary detention deportation forcible trans fer population systematic racial discrimination fall category gross violation human right deliberate systematic deprivation essential foodstuff essential primary health care basic shelter housing may also amount gross violation human right n 3 security council resolution 1856 2 december 2008 un doc sres1856 n 4 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 5 1948 convention prevention punishment crime genocide international covenant civil political right 1984 convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment international convention protection per son enforced disappearance geneva convention 1949 1977 protocol additional noi geneva convention 12 august 1949 protocol additional noii n 6 un document ecn42005102add1 n 7 un document ares60147 n 8 united nation commission human right updated set principle protection promo tion human right action combat impunity hereafter updated set principle principle 32 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102ad1 n 9 un document s2004616 n 10 see updated principle principle 24 n 11 un document s2004616 n 12 rome statute international criminal court see preamble article 17 n 13 mary robinson foreword princeton principle universal jurisdiction princeton univer sity press princeton 2001 p 16 n 14 united nation general assembly 16 december 2005 un doc ares60147 n 15 ibid principle 15 n 16 ibid principle 16 n 17 ibid principle 19 n 18 see united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also principle 36 c e according civilian control military security force well intelligence agency must ensured necessary established restored end state establish effective institution civilian oversight military security force intelligence agency including legislative oversight body public official employee particular involved military security police intelligence judicial sector ceive comprehensive ongoing training human right applicable humanitarian law standard implementation standard n 19 vetting process aim exclude person serious integrity deficit public service important aspect institutional reform country transition united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also n 20 ohchr tool vetting page 4 n 21 updated set principle impunity principle 36 n 22 iddrs operation programme support social economic reintegration united nation new york august 2006 410 n 23 united nation secretarygeneral bulletin 6 august 1999 un doc stsgb199913 n 24 ibid p 2 n 25 pigou pier community reconciliation process commission reception truth reconciliation undp timorleste dili april 2004 n 26 multicountry demobilization reintegration program rwanda httpwwwmdrporgrwanda htm accessed 9 july 2008 n 27 united nation security council report secretary general securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform 23 january 2008 un doc a62659 s200839 n 28 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 29 paris principle 36 n 30 crc article 39 optional protocol convention right child involvement child armed conflict article 6 n 31 un guideline justice matter involving child victim witness crime n 32 protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim noninternational armed conflict protocol ii article 6 5", "ProcessedSent": "n 13 mary robinson foreword princeton principle universal jurisdiction princeton univer sity press princeton 2001 p 16", "SentID": 11605 }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208920,14 +208920,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc.", + "Sentence": "\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc.", "newParagraph": "1 united nation security council report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2004616 n 2 formally defined generally assumed genocide slavery slave trade extra judicial summary arbitrary execution enforces disappearance torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment prolonged arbitrary detention deportation forcible trans fer population systematic racial discrimination fall category gross violation human right deliberate systematic deprivation essential foodstuff essential primary health care basic shelter housing may also amount gross violation human right n 3 security council resolution 1856 2 december 2008 un doc sres1856 n 4 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 5 1948 convention prevention punishment crime genocide international covenant civil political right 1984 convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment international convention protection per son enforced disappearance geneva convention 1949 1977 protocol additional noi geneva convention 12 august 1949 protocol additional noii n 6 un document ecn42005102add1 n 7 un document ares60147 n 8 united nation commission human right updated set principle protection promo tion human right action combat impunity hereafter updated set principle principle 32 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102ad1 n 9 un document s2004616 n 10 see updated principle principle 24 n 11 un document s2004616 n 12 rome statute international criminal court see preamble article 17 n 13 mary robinson foreword princeton principle universal jurisdiction princeton univer sity press princeton 2001 p 16 n 14 united nation general assembly 16 december 2005 un doc ares60147 n 15 ibid principle 15 n 16 ibid principle 16 n 17 ibid principle 19 n 18 see united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also principle 36 c e according civilian control military security force well intelligence agency must ensured necessary established restored end state establish effective institution civilian oversight military security force intelligence agency including legislative oversight body public official employee particular involved military security police intelligence judicial sector ceive comprehensive ongoing training human right applicable humanitarian law standard implementation standard n 19 vetting process aim exclude person serious integrity deficit public service important aspect institutional reform country transition united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also n 20 ohchr tool vetting page 4 n 21 updated set principle impunity principle 36 n 22 iddrs operation programme support social economic reintegration united nation new york august 2006 410 n 23 united nation secretarygeneral bulletin 6 august 1999 un doc stsgb199913 n 24 ibid p 2 n 25 pigou pier community reconciliation process commission reception truth reconciliation undp timorleste dili april 2004 n 26 multicountry demobilization reintegration program rwanda httpwwwmdrporgrwanda htm accessed 9 july 2008 n 27 united nation security council report secretary general securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform 23 january 2008 un doc a62659 s200839 n 28 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 29 paris principle 36 n 30 crc article 39 optional protocol convention right child involvement child armed conflict article 6 n 31 un guideline justice matter involving child victim witness crime n 32 protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim noninternational armed conflict protocol ii article 6 5", "ProcessedSent": "n 14 united nation general assembly 16 december 2005 un doc", "SentID": 11606 }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208945,7 +208945,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208956,14 +208956,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15.", + "Sentence": "\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15.", "newParagraph": "1 united nation security council report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2004616 n 2 formally defined generally assumed genocide slavery slave trade extra judicial summary arbitrary execution enforces disappearance torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment prolonged arbitrary detention deportation forcible trans fer population systematic racial discrimination fall category gross violation human right deliberate systematic deprivation essential foodstuff essential primary health care basic shelter housing may also amount gross violation human right n 3 security council resolution 1856 2 december 2008 un doc sres1856 n 4 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 5 1948 convention prevention punishment crime genocide international covenant civil political right 1984 convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment international convention protection per son enforced disappearance geneva convention 1949 1977 protocol additional noi geneva convention 12 august 1949 protocol additional noii n 6 un document ecn42005102add1 n 7 un document ares60147 n 8 united nation commission human right updated set principle protection promo tion human right action combat impunity hereafter updated set principle principle 32 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102ad1 n 9 un document s2004616 n 10 see updated principle principle 24 n 11 un document s2004616 n 12 rome statute international criminal court see preamble article 17 n 13 mary robinson foreword princeton principle universal jurisdiction princeton univer sity press princeton 2001 p 16 n 14 united nation general assembly 16 december 2005 un doc ares60147 n 15 ibid principle 15 n 16 ibid principle 16 n 17 ibid principle 19 n 18 see united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also principle 36 c e according civilian control military security force well intelligence agency must ensured necessary established restored end state establish effective institution civilian oversight military security force intelligence agency including legislative oversight body public official employee particular involved military security police intelligence judicial sector ceive comprehensive ongoing training human right applicable humanitarian law standard implementation standard n 19 vetting process aim exclude person serious integrity deficit public service important aspect institutional reform country transition united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also n 20 ohchr tool vetting page 4 n 21 updated set principle impunity principle 36 n 22 iddrs operation programme support social economic reintegration united nation new york august 2006 410 n 23 united nation secretarygeneral bulletin 6 august 1999 un doc stsgb199913 n 24 ibid p 2 n 25 pigou pier community reconciliation process commission reception truth reconciliation undp timorleste dili april 2004 n 26 multicountry demobilization reintegration program rwanda httpwwwmdrporgrwanda htm accessed 9 july 2008 n 27 united nation security council report secretary general securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform 23 january 2008 un doc a62659 s200839 n 28 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 29 paris principle 36 n 30 crc article 39 optional protocol convention right child involvement child armed conflict article 6 n 31 un guideline justice matter involving child victim witness crime n 32 protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim noninternational armed conflict protocol ii article 6 5", "ProcessedSent": "n 15 ibid principle 15", "SentID": 11608 }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208974,14 +208974,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16.", + "Sentence": "\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16.", "newParagraph": "1 united nation security council report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2004616 n 2 formally defined generally assumed genocide slavery slave trade extra judicial summary arbitrary execution enforces disappearance torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment prolonged arbitrary detention deportation forcible trans fer population systematic racial discrimination fall category gross violation human right deliberate systematic deprivation essential foodstuff essential primary health care basic shelter housing may also amount gross violation human right n 3 security council resolution 1856 2 december 2008 un doc sres1856 n 4 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 5 1948 convention prevention punishment crime genocide international covenant civil political right 1984 convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment international convention protection per son enforced disappearance geneva convention 1949 1977 protocol additional noi geneva convention 12 august 1949 protocol additional noii n 6 un document ecn42005102add1 n 7 un document ares60147 n 8 united nation commission human right updated set principle protection promo tion human right action combat impunity hereafter updated set principle principle 32 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102ad1 n 9 un document s2004616 n 10 see updated principle principle 24 n 11 un document s2004616 n 12 rome statute international criminal court see preamble article 17 n 13 mary robinson foreword princeton principle universal jurisdiction princeton univer sity press princeton 2001 p 16 n 14 united nation general assembly 16 december 2005 un doc ares60147 n 15 ibid principle 15 n 16 ibid principle 16 n 17 ibid principle 19 n 18 see united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also principle 36 c e according civilian control military security force well intelligence agency must ensured necessary established restored end state establish effective institution civilian oversight military security force intelligence agency including legislative oversight body public official employee particular involved military security police intelligence judicial sector ceive comprehensive ongoing training human right applicable humanitarian law standard implementation standard n 19 vetting process aim exclude person serious integrity deficit public service important aspect institutional reform country transition united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also n 20 ohchr tool vetting page 4 n 21 updated set principle impunity principle 36 n 22 iddrs operation programme support social economic reintegration united nation new york august 2006 410 n 23 united nation secretarygeneral bulletin 6 august 1999 un doc stsgb199913 n 24 ibid p 2 n 25 pigou pier community reconciliation process commission reception truth reconciliation undp timorleste dili april 2004 n 26 multicountry demobilization reintegration program rwanda httpwwwmdrporgrwanda htm accessed 9 july 2008 n 27 united nation security council report secretary general securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform 23 january 2008 un doc a62659 s200839 n 28 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 29 paris principle 36 n 30 crc article 39 optional protocol convention right child involvement child armed conflict article 6 n 31 un guideline justice matter involving child victim witness crime n 32 protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim noninternational armed conflict protocol ii article 6 5", "ProcessedSent": "n 16 ibid principle 16", "SentID": 11609 }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -208992,14 +208992,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19.", + "Sentence": "\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19.", "newParagraph": "1 united nation security council report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2004616 n 2 formally defined generally assumed genocide slavery slave trade extra judicial summary arbitrary execution enforces disappearance torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment prolonged arbitrary detention deportation forcible trans fer population systematic racial discrimination fall category gross violation human right deliberate systematic deprivation essential foodstuff essential primary health care basic shelter housing may also amount gross violation human right n 3 security council resolution 1856 2 december 2008 un doc sres1856 n 4 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 5 1948 convention prevention punishment crime genocide international covenant civil political right 1984 convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment international convention protection per son enforced disappearance geneva convention 1949 1977 protocol additional noi geneva convention 12 august 1949 protocol additional noii n 6 un document ecn42005102add1 n 7 un document ares60147 n 8 united nation commission human right updated set principle protection promo tion human right action combat impunity hereafter updated set principle principle 32 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102ad1 n 9 un document s2004616 n 10 see updated principle principle 24 n 11 un document s2004616 n 12 rome statute international criminal court see preamble article 17 n 13 mary robinson foreword princeton principle universal jurisdiction princeton univer sity press princeton 2001 p 16 n 14 united nation general assembly 16 december 2005 un doc ares60147 n 15 ibid principle 15 n 16 ibid principle 16 n 17 ibid principle 19 n 18 see united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also principle 36 c e according civilian control military security force well intelligence agency must ensured necessary established restored end state establish effective institution civilian oversight military security force intelligence agency including legislative oversight body public official employee particular involved military security police intelligence judicial sector ceive comprehensive ongoing training human right applicable humanitarian law standard implementation standard n 19 vetting process aim exclude person serious integrity deficit public service important aspect institutional reform country transition united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also n 20 ohchr tool vetting page 4 n 21 updated set principle impunity principle 36 n 22 iddrs operation programme support social economic reintegration united nation new york august 2006 410 n 23 united nation secretarygeneral bulletin 6 august 1999 un doc stsgb199913 n 24 ibid p 2 n 25 pigou pier community reconciliation process commission reception truth reconciliation undp timorleste dili april 2004 n 26 multicountry demobilization reintegration program rwanda httpwwwmdrporgrwanda htm accessed 9 july 2008 n 27 united nation security council report secretary general securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform 23 january 2008 un doc a62659 s200839 n 28 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 29 paris principle 36 n 30 crc article 39 optional protocol convention right child involvement child armed conflict article 6 n 31 un guideline justice matter involving child victim witness crime n 32 protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim noninternational armed conflict protocol ii article 6 5", "ProcessedSent": "n 17 ibid principle 19", "SentID": 11610 }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -209010,14 +209010,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36.", + "Sentence": "\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36.", "newParagraph": "1 united nation security council report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2004616 n 2 formally defined generally assumed genocide slavery slave trade extra judicial summary arbitrary execution enforces disappearance torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment prolonged arbitrary detention deportation forcible trans fer population systematic racial discrimination fall category gross violation human right deliberate systematic deprivation essential foodstuff essential primary health care basic shelter housing may also amount gross violation human right n 3 security council resolution 1856 2 december 2008 un doc sres1856 n 4 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 5 1948 convention prevention punishment crime genocide international covenant civil political right 1984 convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment international convention protection per son enforced disappearance geneva convention 1949 1977 protocol additional noi geneva convention 12 august 1949 protocol additional noii n 6 un document ecn42005102add1 n 7 un document ares60147 n 8 united nation commission human right updated set principle protection promo tion human right action combat impunity hereafter updated set principle principle 32 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102ad1 n 9 un document s2004616 n 10 see updated principle principle 24 n 11 un document s2004616 n 12 rome statute international criminal court see preamble article 17 n 13 mary robinson foreword princeton principle universal jurisdiction princeton univer sity press princeton 2001 p 16 n 14 united nation general assembly 16 december 2005 un doc ares60147 n 15 ibid principle 15 n 16 ibid principle 16 n 17 ibid principle 19 n 18 see united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also principle 36 c e according civilian control military security force well intelligence agency must ensured necessary established restored end state establish effective institution civilian oversight military security force intelligence agency including legislative oversight body public official employee particular involved military security police intelligence judicial sector ceive comprehensive ongoing training human right applicable humanitarian law standard implementation standard n 19 vetting process aim exclude person serious integrity deficit public service important aspect institutional reform country transition united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also n 20 ohchr tool vetting page 4 n 21 updated set principle impunity principle 36 n 22 iddrs operation programme support social economic reintegration united nation new york august 2006 410 n 23 united nation secretarygeneral bulletin 6 august 1999 un doc stsgb199913 n 24 ibid p 2 n 25 pigou pier community reconciliation process commission reception truth reconciliation undp timorleste dili april 2004 n 26 multicountry demobilization reintegration program rwanda httpwwwmdrporgrwanda htm accessed 9 july 2008 n 27 united nation security council report secretary general securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform 23 january 2008 un doc a62659 s200839 n 28 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 29 paris principle 36 n 30 crc article 39 optional protocol convention right child involvement child armed conflict article 6 n 31 un guideline justice matter involving child victim witness crime n 32 protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim noninternational armed conflict protocol ii article 6 5", "ProcessedSent": "n 18 see united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36", "SentID": 11611 }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -209035,7 +209035,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -209053,7 +209053,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -209064,14 +209064,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": ". . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition.", + "Sentence": ". . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition.", "newParagraph": "1 united nation security council report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2004616 n 2 formally defined generally assumed genocide slavery slave trade extra judicial summary arbitrary execution enforces disappearance torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment prolonged arbitrary detention deportation forcible trans fer population systematic racial discrimination fall category gross violation human right deliberate systematic deprivation essential foodstuff essential primary health care basic shelter housing may also amount gross violation human right n 3 security council resolution 1856 2 december 2008 un doc sres1856 n 4 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 5 1948 convention prevention punishment crime genocide international covenant civil political right 1984 convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment international convention protection per son enforced disappearance geneva convention 1949 1977 protocol additional noi geneva convention 12 august 1949 protocol additional noii n 6 un document ecn42005102add1 n 7 un document ares60147 n 8 united nation commission human right updated set principle protection promo tion human right action combat impunity hereafter updated set principle principle 32 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102ad1 n 9 un document s2004616 n 10 see updated principle principle 24 n 11 un document s2004616 n 12 rome statute international criminal court see preamble article 17 n 13 mary robinson foreword princeton principle universal jurisdiction princeton univer sity press princeton 2001 p 16 n 14 united nation general assembly 16 december 2005 un doc ares60147 n 15 ibid principle 15 n 16 ibid principle 16 n 17 ibid principle 19 n 18 see united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also principle 36 c e according civilian control military security force well intelligence agency must ensured necessary established restored end state establish effective institution civilian oversight military security force intelligence agency including legislative oversight body public official employee particular involved military security police intelligence judicial sector ceive comprehensive ongoing training human right applicable humanitarian law standard implementation standard n 19 vetting process aim exclude person serious integrity deficit public service important aspect institutional reform country transition united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also n 20 ohchr tool vetting page 4 n 21 updated set principle impunity principle 36 n 22 iddrs operation programme support social economic reintegration united nation new york august 2006 410 n 23 united nation secretarygeneral bulletin 6 august 1999 un doc stsgb199913 n 24 ibid p 2 n 25 pigou pier community reconciliation process commission reception truth reconciliation undp timorleste dili april 2004 n 26 multicountry demobilization reintegration program rwanda httpwwwmdrporgrwanda htm accessed 9 july 2008 n 27 united nation security council report secretary general securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform 23 january 2008 un doc a62659 s200839 n 28 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 29 paris principle 36 n 30 crc article 39 optional protocol convention right child involvement child armed conflict article 6 n 31 un guideline justice matter involving child victim witness crime n 32 protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim noninternational armed conflict protocol ii article 6 5", "ProcessedSent": " public official employee particular involved military security police intelligence judicial sector ceive comprehensive ongoing training human right applicable humanitarian law standard implementation standard n 19 vetting process aim exclude person serious integrity deficit public service important aspect institutional reform country transition", "SentID": 11614 }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -209089,7 +209089,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -209100,14 +209100,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4.", + "Sentence": "See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4.", "newParagraph": "1 united nation security council report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2004616 n 2 formally defined generally assumed genocide slavery slave trade extra judicial summary arbitrary execution enforces disappearance torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment prolonged arbitrary detention deportation forcible trans fer population systematic racial discrimination fall category gross violation human right deliberate systematic deprivation essential foodstuff essential primary health care basic shelter housing may also amount gross violation human right n 3 security council resolution 1856 2 december 2008 un doc sres1856 n 4 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 5 1948 convention prevention punishment crime genocide international covenant civil political right 1984 convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment international convention protection per son enforced disappearance geneva convention 1949 1977 protocol additional noi geneva convention 12 august 1949 protocol additional noii n 6 un document ecn42005102add1 n 7 un document ares60147 n 8 united nation commission human right updated set principle protection promo tion human right action combat impunity hereafter updated set principle principle 32 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102ad1 n 9 un document s2004616 n 10 see updated principle principle 24 n 11 un document s2004616 n 12 rome statute international criminal court see preamble article 17 n 13 mary robinson foreword princeton principle universal jurisdiction princeton univer sity press princeton 2001 p 16 n 14 united nation general assembly 16 december 2005 un doc ares60147 n 15 ibid principle 15 n 16 ibid principle 16 n 17 ibid principle 19 n 18 see united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also principle 36 c e according civilian control military security force well intelligence agency must ensured necessary established restored end state establish effective institution civilian oversight military security force intelligence agency including legislative oversight body public official employee particular involved military security police intelligence judicial sector ceive comprehensive ongoing training human right applicable humanitarian law standard implementation standard n 19 vetting process aim exclude person serious integrity deficit public service important aspect institutional reform country transition united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also n 20 ohchr tool vetting page 4 n 21 updated set principle impunity principle 36 n 22 iddrs operation programme support social economic reintegration united nation new york august 2006 410 n 23 united nation secretarygeneral bulletin 6 august 1999 un doc stsgb199913 n 24 ibid p 2 n 25 pigou pier community reconciliation process commission reception truth reconciliation undp timorleste dili april 2004 n 26 multicountry demobilization reintegration program rwanda httpwwwmdrporgrwanda htm accessed 9 july 2008 n 27 united nation security council report secretary general securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform 23 january 2008 un doc a62659 s200839 n 28 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 29 paris principle 36 n 30 crc article 39 optional protocol convention right child involvement child armed conflict article 6 n 31 un guideline justice matter involving child victim witness crime n 32 protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim noninternational armed conflict protocol ii article 6 5", "ProcessedSent": "see also n 20 ohchr tool vetting page 4", "SentID": 11616 }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -209118,14 +209118,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36.", + "Sentence": "\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36.", "newParagraph": "1 united nation security council report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2004616 n 2 formally defined generally assumed genocide slavery slave trade extra judicial summary arbitrary execution enforces disappearance torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment prolonged arbitrary detention deportation forcible trans fer population systematic racial discrimination fall category gross violation human right deliberate systematic deprivation essential foodstuff essential primary health care basic shelter housing may also amount gross violation human right n 3 security council resolution 1856 2 december 2008 un doc sres1856 n 4 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 5 1948 convention prevention punishment crime genocide international covenant civil political right 1984 convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment international convention protection per son enforced disappearance geneva convention 1949 1977 protocol additional noi geneva convention 12 august 1949 protocol additional noii n 6 un document ecn42005102add1 n 7 un document ares60147 n 8 united nation commission human right updated set principle protection promo tion human right action combat impunity hereafter updated set principle principle 32 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102ad1 n 9 un document s2004616 n 10 see updated principle principle 24 n 11 un document s2004616 n 12 rome statute international criminal court see preamble article 17 n 13 mary robinson foreword princeton principle universal jurisdiction princeton univer sity press princeton 2001 p 16 n 14 united nation general assembly 16 december 2005 un doc ares60147 n 15 ibid principle 15 n 16 ibid principle 16 n 17 ibid principle 19 n 18 see united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also principle 36 c e according civilian control military security force well intelligence agency must ensured necessary established restored end state establish effective institution civilian oversight military security force intelligence agency including legislative oversight body public official employee particular involved military security police intelligence judicial sector ceive comprehensive ongoing training human right applicable humanitarian law standard implementation standard n 19 vetting process aim exclude person serious integrity deficit public service important aspect institutional reform country transition united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also n 20 ohchr tool vetting page 4 n 21 updated set principle impunity principle 36 n 22 iddrs operation programme support social economic reintegration united nation new york august 2006 410 n 23 united nation secretarygeneral bulletin 6 august 1999 un doc stsgb199913 n 24 ibid p 2 n 25 pigou pier community reconciliation process commission reception truth reconciliation undp timorleste dili april 2004 n 26 multicountry demobilization reintegration program rwanda httpwwwmdrporgrwanda htm accessed 9 july 2008 n 27 united nation security council report secretary general securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform 23 january 2008 un doc a62659 s200839 n 28 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 29 paris principle 36 n 30 crc article 39 optional protocol convention right child involvement child armed conflict article 6 n 31 un guideline justice matter involving child victim witness crime n 32 protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim noninternational armed conflict protocol ii article 6 5", "ProcessedSent": "n 21 updated set principle impunity principle 36", "SentID": 11617 }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -209136,14 +209136,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10.", + "Sentence": "\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10.", "newParagraph": "1 united nation security council report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2004616 n 2 formally defined generally assumed genocide slavery slave trade extra judicial summary arbitrary execution enforces disappearance torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment prolonged arbitrary detention deportation forcible trans fer population systematic racial discrimination fall category gross violation human right deliberate systematic deprivation essential foodstuff essential primary health care basic shelter housing may also amount gross violation human right n 3 security council resolution 1856 2 december 2008 un doc sres1856 n 4 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 5 1948 convention prevention punishment crime genocide international covenant civil political right 1984 convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment international convention protection per son enforced disappearance geneva convention 1949 1977 protocol additional noi geneva convention 12 august 1949 protocol additional noii n 6 un document ecn42005102add1 n 7 un document ares60147 n 8 united nation commission human right updated set principle protection promo tion human right action combat impunity hereafter updated set principle principle 32 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102ad1 n 9 un document s2004616 n 10 see updated principle principle 24 n 11 un document s2004616 n 12 rome statute international criminal court see preamble article 17 n 13 mary robinson foreword princeton principle universal jurisdiction princeton univer sity press princeton 2001 p 16 n 14 united nation general assembly 16 december 2005 un doc ares60147 n 15 ibid principle 15 n 16 ibid principle 16 n 17 ibid principle 19 n 18 see united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also principle 36 c e according civilian control military security force well intelligence agency must ensured necessary established restored end state establish effective institution civilian oversight military security force intelligence agency including legislative oversight body public official employee particular involved military security police intelligence judicial sector ceive comprehensive ongoing training human right applicable humanitarian law standard implementation standard n 19 vetting process aim exclude person serious integrity deficit public service important aspect institutional reform country transition united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also n 20 ohchr tool vetting page 4 n 21 updated set principle impunity principle 36 n 22 iddrs operation programme support social economic reintegration united nation new york august 2006 410 n 23 united nation secretarygeneral bulletin 6 august 1999 un doc stsgb199913 n 24 ibid p 2 n 25 pigou pier community reconciliation process commission reception truth reconciliation undp timorleste dili april 2004 n 26 multicountry demobilization reintegration program rwanda httpwwwmdrporgrwanda htm accessed 9 july 2008 n 27 united nation security council report secretary general securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform 23 january 2008 un doc a62659 s200839 n 28 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 29 paris principle 36 n 30 crc article 39 optional protocol convention right child involvement child armed conflict article 6 n 31 un guideline justice matter involving child victim witness crime n 32 protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim noninternational armed conflict protocol ii article 6 5", "ProcessedSent": "n 22 iddrs operation programme support social economic reintegration united nation new york august 2006 410", "SentID": 11618 }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -209154,14 +209154,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc.", + "Sentence": "\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc.", "newParagraph": "1 united nation security council report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2004616 n 2 formally defined generally assumed genocide slavery slave trade extra judicial summary arbitrary execution enforces disappearance torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment prolonged arbitrary detention deportation forcible trans fer population systematic racial discrimination fall category gross violation human right deliberate systematic deprivation essential foodstuff essential primary health care basic shelter housing may also amount gross violation human right n 3 security council resolution 1856 2 december 2008 un doc sres1856 n 4 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 5 1948 convention prevention punishment crime genocide international covenant civil political right 1984 convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment international convention protection per son enforced disappearance geneva convention 1949 1977 protocol additional noi geneva convention 12 august 1949 protocol additional noii n 6 un document ecn42005102add1 n 7 un document ares60147 n 8 united nation commission human right updated set principle protection promo tion human right action combat impunity hereafter updated set principle principle 32 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102ad1 n 9 un document s2004616 n 10 see updated principle principle 24 n 11 un document s2004616 n 12 rome statute international criminal court see preamble article 17 n 13 mary robinson foreword princeton principle universal jurisdiction princeton univer sity press princeton 2001 p 16 n 14 united nation general assembly 16 december 2005 un doc ares60147 n 15 ibid principle 15 n 16 ibid principle 16 n 17 ibid principle 19 n 18 see united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also principle 36 c e according civilian control military security force well intelligence agency must ensured necessary established restored end state establish effective institution civilian oversight military security force intelligence agency including legislative oversight body public official employee particular involved military security police intelligence judicial sector ceive comprehensive ongoing training human right applicable humanitarian law standard implementation standard n 19 vetting process aim exclude person serious integrity deficit public service important aspect institutional reform country transition united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also n 20 ohchr tool vetting page 4 n 21 updated set principle impunity principle 36 n 22 iddrs operation programme support social economic reintegration united nation new york august 2006 410 n 23 united nation secretarygeneral bulletin 6 august 1999 un doc stsgb199913 n 24 ibid p 2 n 25 pigou pier community reconciliation process commission reception truth reconciliation undp timorleste dili april 2004 n 26 multicountry demobilization reintegration program rwanda httpwwwmdrporgrwanda htm accessed 9 july 2008 n 27 united nation security council report secretary general securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform 23 january 2008 un doc a62659 s200839 n 28 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 29 paris principle 36 n 30 crc article 39 optional protocol convention right child involvement child armed conflict article 6 n 31 un guideline justice matter involving child victim witness crime n 32 protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim noninternational armed conflict protocol ii article 6 5", "ProcessedSent": "n 23 united nation secretarygeneral bulletin 6 august 1999 un doc", "SentID": 11619 }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -209179,7 +209179,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -209190,14 +209190,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 24 Ibid.", + "Sentence": "\n 24 Ibid.", "newParagraph": "1 united nation security council report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2004616 n 2 formally defined generally assumed genocide slavery slave trade extra judicial summary arbitrary execution enforces disappearance torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment prolonged arbitrary detention deportation forcible trans fer population systematic racial discrimination fall category gross violation human right deliberate systematic deprivation essential foodstuff essential primary health care basic shelter housing may also amount gross violation human right n 3 security council resolution 1856 2 december 2008 un doc sres1856 n 4 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 5 1948 convention prevention punishment crime genocide international covenant civil political right 1984 convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment international convention protection per son enforced disappearance geneva convention 1949 1977 protocol additional noi geneva convention 12 august 1949 protocol additional noii n 6 un document ecn42005102add1 n 7 un document ares60147 n 8 united nation commission human right updated set principle protection promo tion human right action combat impunity hereafter updated set principle principle 32 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102ad1 n 9 un document s2004616 n 10 see updated principle principle 24 n 11 un document s2004616 n 12 rome statute international criminal court see preamble article 17 n 13 mary robinson foreword princeton principle universal jurisdiction princeton univer sity press princeton 2001 p 16 n 14 united nation general assembly 16 december 2005 un doc ares60147 n 15 ibid principle 15 n 16 ibid principle 16 n 17 ibid principle 19 n 18 see united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also principle 36 c e according civilian control military security force well intelligence agency must ensured necessary established restored end state establish effective institution civilian oversight military security force intelligence agency including legislative oversight body public official employee particular involved military security police intelligence judicial sector ceive comprehensive ongoing training human right applicable humanitarian law standard implementation standard n 19 vetting process aim exclude person serious integrity deficit public service important aspect institutional reform country transition united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also n 20 ohchr tool vetting page 4 n 21 updated set principle impunity principle 36 n 22 iddrs operation programme support social economic reintegration united nation new york august 2006 410 n 23 united nation secretarygeneral bulletin 6 august 1999 un doc stsgb199913 n 24 ibid p 2 n 25 pigou pier community reconciliation process commission reception truth reconciliation undp timorleste dili april 2004 n 26 multicountry demobilization reintegration program rwanda httpwwwmdrporgrwanda htm accessed 9 july 2008 n 27 united nation security council report secretary general securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform 23 january 2008 un doc a62659 s200839 n 28 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 29 paris principle 36 n 30 crc article 39 optional protocol convention right child involvement child armed conflict article 6 n 31 un guideline justice matter involving child victim witness crime n 32 protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim noninternational armed conflict protocol ii article 6 5", "ProcessedSent": "n 24 ibid", "SentID": 11621 }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -209208,14 +209208,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004.", + "Sentence": "p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004.", "newParagraph": "1 united nation security council report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2004616 n 2 formally defined generally assumed genocide slavery slave trade extra judicial summary arbitrary execution enforces disappearance torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment prolonged arbitrary detention deportation forcible trans fer population systematic racial discrimination fall category gross violation human right deliberate systematic deprivation essential foodstuff essential primary health care basic shelter housing may also amount gross violation human right n 3 security council resolution 1856 2 december 2008 un doc sres1856 n 4 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 5 1948 convention prevention punishment crime genocide international covenant civil political right 1984 convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment international convention protection per son enforced disappearance geneva convention 1949 1977 protocol additional noi geneva convention 12 august 1949 protocol additional noii n 6 un document ecn42005102add1 n 7 un document ares60147 n 8 united nation commission human right updated set principle protection promo tion human right action combat impunity hereafter updated set principle principle 32 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102ad1 n 9 un document s2004616 n 10 see updated principle principle 24 n 11 un document s2004616 n 12 rome statute international criminal court see preamble article 17 n 13 mary robinson foreword princeton principle universal jurisdiction princeton univer sity press princeton 2001 p 16 n 14 united nation general assembly 16 december 2005 un doc ares60147 n 15 ibid principle 15 n 16 ibid principle 16 n 17 ibid principle 19 n 18 see united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also principle 36 c e according civilian control military security force well intelligence agency must ensured necessary established restored end state establish effective institution civilian oversight military security force intelligence agency including legislative oversight body public official employee particular involved military security police intelligence judicial sector ceive comprehensive ongoing training human right applicable humanitarian law standard implementation standard n 19 vetting process aim exclude person serious integrity deficit public service important aspect institutional reform country transition united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also n 20 ohchr tool vetting page 4 n 21 updated set principle impunity principle 36 n 22 iddrs operation programme support social economic reintegration united nation new york august 2006 410 n 23 united nation secretarygeneral bulletin 6 august 1999 un doc stsgb199913 n 24 ibid p 2 n 25 pigou pier community reconciliation process commission reception truth reconciliation undp timorleste dili april 2004 n 26 multicountry demobilization reintegration program rwanda httpwwwmdrporgrwanda htm accessed 9 july 2008 n 27 united nation security council report secretary general securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform 23 january 2008 un doc a62659 s200839 n 28 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 29 paris principle 36 n 30 crc article 39 optional protocol convention right child involvement child armed conflict article 6 n 31 un guideline justice matter involving child victim witness crime n 32 protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim noninternational armed conflict protocol ii article 6 5", "ProcessedSent": "p 2 n 25 pigou pier community reconciliation process commission reception truth reconciliation undp timorleste dili april 2004", "SentID": 11622 }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -209226,14 +209226,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda.", + "Sentence": "\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda.", "newParagraph": "1 united nation security council report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2004616 n 2 formally defined generally assumed genocide slavery slave trade extra judicial summary arbitrary execution enforces disappearance torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment prolonged arbitrary detention deportation forcible trans fer population systematic racial discrimination fall category gross violation human right deliberate systematic deprivation essential foodstuff essential primary health care basic shelter housing may also amount gross violation human right n 3 security council resolution 1856 2 december 2008 un doc sres1856 n 4 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 5 1948 convention prevention punishment crime genocide international covenant civil political right 1984 convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment international convention protection per son enforced disappearance geneva convention 1949 1977 protocol additional noi geneva convention 12 august 1949 protocol additional noii n 6 un document ecn42005102add1 n 7 un document ares60147 n 8 united nation commission human right updated set principle protection promo tion human right action combat impunity hereafter updated set principle principle 32 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102ad1 n 9 un document s2004616 n 10 see updated principle principle 24 n 11 un document s2004616 n 12 rome statute international criminal court see preamble article 17 n 13 mary robinson foreword princeton principle universal jurisdiction princeton univer sity press princeton 2001 p 16 n 14 united nation general assembly 16 december 2005 un doc ares60147 n 15 ibid principle 15 n 16 ibid principle 16 n 17 ibid principle 19 n 18 see united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also principle 36 c e according civilian control military security force well intelligence agency must ensured necessary established restored end state establish effective institution civilian oversight military security force intelligence agency including legislative oversight body public official employee particular involved military security police intelligence judicial sector ceive comprehensive ongoing training human right applicable humanitarian law standard implementation standard n 19 vetting process aim exclude person serious integrity deficit public service important aspect institutional reform country transition united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also n 20 ohchr tool vetting page 4 n 21 updated set principle impunity principle 36 n 22 iddrs operation programme support social economic reintegration united nation new york august 2006 410 n 23 united nation secretarygeneral bulletin 6 august 1999 un doc stsgb199913 n 24 ibid p 2 n 25 pigou pier community reconciliation process commission reception truth reconciliation undp timorleste dili april 2004 n 26 multicountry demobilization reintegration program rwanda httpwwwmdrporgrwanda htm accessed 9 july 2008 n 27 united nation security council report secretary general securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform 23 january 2008 un doc a62659 s200839 n 28 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 29 paris principle 36 n 30 crc article 39 optional protocol convention right child involvement child armed conflict article 6 n 31 un guideline justice matter involving child victim witness crime n 32 protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim noninternational armed conflict protocol ii article 6 5", "ProcessedSent": "n 26 multicountry demobilization reintegration program rwanda httpwwwmdrporgrwanda", "SentID": 11623 }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -209251,7 +209251,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -209262,14 +209262,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc.", + "Sentence": "\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc.", "newParagraph": "1 united nation security council report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2004616 n 2 formally defined generally assumed genocide slavery slave trade extra judicial summary arbitrary execution enforces disappearance torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment prolonged arbitrary detention deportation forcible trans fer population systematic racial discrimination fall category gross violation human right deliberate systematic deprivation essential foodstuff essential primary health care basic shelter housing may also amount gross violation human right n 3 security council resolution 1856 2 december 2008 un doc sres1856 n 4 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 5 1948 convention prevention punishment crime genocide international covenant civil political right 1984 convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment international convention protection per son enforced disappearance geneva convention 1949 1977 protocol additional noi geneva convention 12 august 1949 protocol additional noii n 6 un document ecn42005102add1 n 7 un document ares60147 n 8 united nation commission human right updated set principle protection promo tion human right action combat impunity hereafter updated set principle principle 32 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102ad1 n 9 un document s2004616 n 10 see updated principle principle 24 n 11 un document s2004616 n 12 rome statute international criminal court see preamble article 17 n 13 mary robinson foreword princeton principle universal jurisdiction princeton univer sity press princeton 2001 p 16 n 14 united nation general assembly 16 december 2005 un doc ares60147 n 15 ibid principle 15 n 16 ibid principle 16 n 17 ibid principle 19 n 18 see united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also principle 36 c e according civilian control military security force well intelligence agency must ensured necessary established restored end state establish effective institution civilian oversight military security force intelligence agency including legislative oversight body public official employee particular involved military security police intelligence judicial sector ceive comprehensive ongoing training human right applicable humanitarian law standard implementation standard n 19 vetting process aim exclude person serious integrity deficit public service important aspect institutional reform country transition united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also n 20 ohchr tool vetting page 4 n 21 updated set principle impunity principle 36 n 22 iddrs operation programme support social economic reintegration united nation new york august 2006 410 n 23 united nation secretarygeneral bulletin 6 august 1999 un doc stsgb199913 n 24 ibid p 2 n 25 pigou pier community reconciliation process commission reception truth reconciliation undp timorleste dili april 2004 n 26 multicountry demobilization reintegration program rwanda httpwwwmdrporgrwanda htm accessed 9 july 2008 n 27 united nation security council report secretary general securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform 23 january 2008 un doc a62659 s200839 n 28 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 29 paris principle 36 n 30 crc article 39 optional protocol convention right child involvement child armed conflict article 6 n 31 un guideline justice matter involving child victim witness crime n 32 protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim noninternational armed conflict protocol ii article 6 5", "ProcessedSent": "n 27 united nation security council report secretary general securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform 23 january 2008 un doc", "SentID": 11625 }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -209287,7 +209287,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -209298,14 +209298,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General.", + "Sentence": "\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General.", "newParagraph": "1 united nation security council report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2004616 n 2 formally defined generally assumed genocide slavery slave trade extra judicial summary arbitrary execution enforces disappearance torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment prolonged arbitrary detention deportation forcible trans fer population systematic racial discrimination fall category gross violation human right deliberate systematic deprivation essential foodstuff essential primary health care basic shelter housing may also amount gross violation human right n 3 security council resolution 1856 2 december 2008 un doc sres1856 n 4 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 5 1948 convention prevention punishment crime genocide international covenant civil political right 1984 convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment international convention protection per son enforced disappearance geneva convention 1949 1977 protocol additional noi geneva convention 12 august 1949 protocol additional noii n 6 un document ecn42005102add1 n 7 un document ares60147 n 8 united nation commission human right updated set principle protection promo tion human right action combat impunity hereafter updated set principle principle 32 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102ad1 n 9 un document s2004616 n 10 see updated principle principle 24 n 11 un document s2004616 n 12 rome statute international criminal court see preamble article 17 n 13 mary robinson foreword princeton principle universal jurisdiction princeton univer sity press princeton 2001 p 16 n 14 united nation general assembly 16 december 2005 un doc ares60147 n 15 ibid principle 15 n 16 ibid principle 16 n 17 ibid principle 19 n 18 see united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also principle 36 c e according civilian control military security force well intelligence agency must ensured necessary established restored end state establish effective institution civilian oversight military security force intelligence agency including legislative oversight body public official employee particular involved military security police intelligence judicial sector ceive comprehensive ongoing training human right applicable humanitarian law standard implementation standard n 19 vetting process aim exclude person serious integrity deficit public service important aspect institutional reform country transition united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also n 20 ohchr tool vetting page 4 n 21 updated set principle impunity principle 36 n 22 iddrs operation programme support social economic reintegration united nation new york august 2006 410 n 23 united nation secretarygeneral bulletin 6 august 1999 un doc stsgb199913 n 24 ibid p 2 n 25 pigou pier community reconciliation process commission reception truth reconciliation undp timorleste dili april 2004 n 26 multicountry demobilization reintegration program rwanda httpwwwmdrporgrwanda htm accessed 9 july 2008 n 27 united nation security council report secretary general securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform 23 january 2008 un doc a62659 s200839 n 28 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 29 paris principle 36 n 30 crc article 39 optional protocol convention right child involvement child armed conflict article 6 n 31 un guideline justice matter involving child victim witness crime n 32 protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim noninternational armed conflict protocol ii article 6 5", "ProcessedSent": "n 28 united nation security council report secretarygeneral", "SentID": 11627 }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -209316,14 +209316,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime.", + "Sentence": "\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime.", "newParagraph": "1 united nation security council report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2004616 n 2 formally defined generally assumed genocide slavery slave trade extra judicial summary arbitrary execution enforces disappearance torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment prolonged arbitrary detention deportation forcible trans fer population systematic racial discrimination fall category gross violation human right deliberate systematic deprivation essential foodstuff essential primary health care basic shelter housing may also amount gross violation human right n 3 security council resolution 1856 2 december 2008 un doc sres1856 n 4 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 5 1948 convention prevention punishment crime genocide international covenant civil political right 1984 convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment international convention protection per son enforced disappearance geneva convention 1949 1977 protocol additional noi geneva convention 12 august 1949 protocol additional noii n 6 un document ecn42005102add1 n 7 un document ares60147 n 8 united nation commission human right updated set principle protection promo tion human right action combat impunity hereafter updated set principle principle 32 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102ad1 n 9 un document s2004616 n 10 see updated principle principle 24 n 11 un document s2004616 n 12 rome statute international criminal court see preamble article 17 n 13 mary robinson foreword princeton principle universal jurisdiction princeton univer sity press princeton 2001 p 16 n 14 united nation general assembly 16 december 2005 un doc ares60147 n 15 ibid principle 15 n 16 ibid principle 16 n 17 ibid principle 19 n 18 see united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also principle 36 c e according civilian control military security force well intelligence agency must ensured necessary established restored end state establish effective institution civilian oversight military security force intelligence agency including legislative oversight body public official employee particular involved military security police intelligence judicial sector ceive comprehensive ongoing training human right applicable humanitarian law standard implementation standard n 19 vetting process aim exclude person serious integrity deficit public service important aspect institutional reform country transition united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also n 20 ohchr tool vetting page 4 n 21 updated set principle impunity principle 36 n 22 iddrs operation programme support social economic reintegration united nation new york august 2006 410 n 23 united nation secretarygeneral bulletin 6 august 1999 un doc stsgb199913 n 24 ibid p 2 n 25 pigou pier community reconciliation process commission reception truth reconciliation undp timorleste dili april 2004 n 26 multicountry demobilization reintegration program rwanda httpwwwmdrporgrwanda htm accessed 9 july 2008 n 27 united nation security council report secretary general securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform 23 january 2008 un doc a62659 s200839 n 28 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 29 paris principle 36 n 30 crc article 39 optional protocol convention right child involvement child armed conflict article 6 n 31 un guideline justice matter involving child victim witness crime n 32 protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim noninternational armed conflict protocol ii article 6 5", "ProcessedSent": "n 29 paris principle 36 n 30 crc article 39 optional protocol convention right child involvement child armed conflict article 6 n 31 un guideline justice matter involving child victim witness crime", "SentID": 11628 }, { "ParagraphID": 3210, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \\n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \\n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \\n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \\n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \\n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \\n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \\n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \\n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \\n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \\n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \\n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \\n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \\n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \\n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \\n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \\n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \\n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \\n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \\n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \\n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \\n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \\n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \\n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \\n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \\n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \\n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \\n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \\n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August 2004, UN Doc. S\/2004\/616. \n 2 While not formally defined, it is generally assumed that genocide, slavery and slave trade, extra- judicial, summary or arbitrary executions; enforces disappearances, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; prolonged arbitrary detention, deportation or forcible trans- fer of populations, and systematic racial discrimination fall into the category of gross violations of human rights. Deliberate and systematic deprivation of essential foodstuffs, essential primary health care or basic shelter and housing may also amount to gross violations of human rights. \n 3 Security Council, Resolution 1856, 2 December 2008, UN Doc. S\/Res\/1856 \n 4 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 5 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment; the International Convention for the Protection of All per- sons from Enforced Disappearance; the Geneva Conventions of 1949; the 1977 Protocol Additional (No.I) to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949; and the Protocol Additional (No.II). \n 6 UN document E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Add.1. \n 7 UN document A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 8 United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of principles for the protection and promo- tion of human rights through action to combat impunity (hereafter, Updated Set of Principles), Principle 32, 8 February 2005, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/2005\/102\/Ad.1. \n 9 UN document S\/2004\/616. \n 10 See the Updated Principles, principle 24. \n 11 UN document S\/2004\/616 \n 12 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, see Preamble and article 17. \n 13 Mary Robinson, \u2018Foreword\u2019, The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 2001, p. 16. \n 14 United Nations General Assembly, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A\/RES\/60\/147. \n 15 Ibid., Principle 15. \n 16 Ibid., Principle 16. \n 17 Ibid., Principle 19. \n 18 See United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also Principle 36 (c) and (e) according to which \u201cCivilian control of military and security forces as well as of intelligence agencies must be ensured and, where necessary, established or restored. To this end, States should establish effective institutions of civilian oversight over military and security forces and intelligence agencies, including legislative oversight bodies; . . . Public officials and employees, in particular those involved in military, security, police, intelligence and judicial sectors, should re- ceive comprehensive and ongoing training in human rights and, where applicable, humanitarian law standards and in implementation of those standards.\u201d \n 19 Vetting processes that aim to exclude persons with serious integrity deficits from public service have been an important aspect of institutional reform in countries in transition. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Updated Set of Principles, Principle 36. See also \n 20 OHCHR Tool on Vetting, page 4. \n 21 Updated Set of Principles on Impunity, principle 36. \n 22 IDDRS, \u201cOperations, Programmes and Support: Social and Economic Reintegration,\u201d (United Nations: New York, August 2006) 4.10. \n 23 United Nations, \u201cSecretary-General\u2019s Bulletin\u201d, 6 August 1999, UN Doc. ST\/SGB\/1999\/13. \n 24 Ibid. p. 2 \n 25 Pigou, Piers, The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation, UNDP Timor-Leste, Dili, April 2004. \n 26 Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program, \u201cRwanda\u201d, http:\/\/www.mdrp.org\/rwanda. htm (accessed 9 July 2008). \n 27 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary General on Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform, 23 January 2008, UN Doc. A\/62\/659\u2014 S\/2008\/39. \n 28 United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General. \n 29 Paris Principles, 3.6 \n 30 CRC, article 39 and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict, article 6 \n 31 UN Guidelines on Justice Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime. \n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -209334,7 +209334,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", + "Sentence": "\n 32 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), article 6 (5).", "newParagraph": "1 united nation security council report secretarygeneral rule law transitional justice conflict postconflict society 3 august 2004 un doc s2004616 n 2 formally defined generally assumed genocide slavery slave trade extra judicial summary arbitrary execution enforces disappearance torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment prolonged arbitrary detention deportation forcible trans fer population systematic racial discrimination fall category gross violation human right deliberate systematic deprivation essential foodstuff essential primary health care basic shelter housing may also amount gross violation human right n 3 security council resolution 1856 2 december 2008 un doc sres1856 n 4 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 5 1948 convention prevention punishment crime genocide international covenant civil political right 1984 convention torture cruel inhuman degrading treatment punishment international convention protection per son enforced disappearance geneva convention 1949 1977 protocol additional noi geneva convention 12 august 1949 protocol additional noii n 6 un document ecn42005102add1 n 7 un document ares60147 n 8 united nation commission human right updated set principle protection promo tion human right action combat impunity hereafter updated set principle principle 32 8 february 2005 un doc ecn42005102ad1 n 9 un document s2004616 n 10 see updated principle principle 24 n 11 un document s2004616 n 12 rome statute international criminal court see preamble article 17 n 13 mary robinson foreword princeton principle universal jurisdiction princeton univer sity press princeton 2001 p 16 n 14 united nation general assembly 16 december 2005 un doc ares60147 n 15 ibid principle 15 n 16 ibid principle 16 n 17 ibid principle 19 n 18 see united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also principle 36 c e according civilian control military security force well intelligence agency must ensured necessary established restored end state establish effective institution civilian oversight military security force intelligence agency including legislative oversight body public official employee particular involved military security police intelligence judicial sector ceive comprehensive ongoing training human right applicable humanitarian law standard implementation standard n 19 vetting process aim exclude person serious integrity deficit public service important aspect institutional reform country transition united nation commission human right updated set principle principle 36 see also n 20 ohchr tool vetting page 4 n 21 updated set principle impunity principle 36 n 22 iddrs operation programme support social economic reintegration united nation new york august 2006 410 n 23 united nation secretarygeneral bulletin 6 august 1999 un doc stsgb199913 n 24 ibid p 2 n 25 pigou pier community reconciliation process commission reception truth reconciliation undp timorleste dili april 2004 n 26 multicountry demobilization reintegration program rwanda httpwwwmdrporgrwanda htm accessed 9 july 2008 n 27 united nation security council report secretary general securing peace development role united nation supporting security sector reform 23 january 2008 un doc a62659 s200839 n 28 united nation security council report secretarygeneral n 29 paris principle 36 n 30 crc article 39 optional protocol convention right child involvement child armed conflict article 6 n 31 un guideline justice matter involving child victim witness crime n 32 protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim noninternational armed conflict protocol ii article 6 5", "ProcessedSent": "n 32 protocol additional geneva convention 12 august 1949 relating protection victim noninternational armed conflict protocol ii article 6 5", "SentID": 11629 @@ -209755,7 +209755,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3218, - "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -209773,7 +209773,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3218, - "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -209791,7 +209791,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3218, - "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -209809,7 +209809,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3218, - "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -209820,7 +209820,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "newParagraph": "annex contains list term definition abbreviation used standard com plete glossary term definition abbreviation used series integrated ddr standard iddrs given iddrs 120 iddrs series word shall may must used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "ProcessedSent": "use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "SentID": 11656 @@ -212095,7 +212095,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3262, - "Paragraph": "At the outset, there are several key risk factors to consider when looking to leverage natural resources to support DDR processes. Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \\n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development. With close attention to whether a robust framework is in place with respect to land rights, and sub-surface natural resource rights as a pre-cursor, engagement with private sector entities can help to facilitate these types of opportunities, whether for high-value natural resources or agricultural commodities with significant market value such as coffee, cocoa, grains or other soft commodities. The risk, however, is that the pressure to kick-start development and earn foreign exchange can lead to rapid, uncontrolled exploitation of such resources at sub-optimal prices, without due attention to land and sub-surface resource rights, environmental sustainability, employment creation and the equitable distribution of revenues. When the benefits are not shared, or when environmental degradation occurs as a consequence of exploitation, there could be serious potential for conflict to resume. \\n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base. Environmental damage caused by conflicts, coping strategies and chronic environmental problems (including climate change impacts) that undermine livelihoods must therefore be addressed from the outset. Minimizing vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change through the management of key natural resources and the introduction of appropriate technologies may also be addressed. Women and children are often disproportionally affected by environmental contamination economically, socially as well as in terms of their health and well-being. DDR practitioners should therefore seek to address the specific needs of women and children in relation to their dependence on natural resources and risks involved. Careful coordination and attention to issues of land access, tenure and the availability of agricultural inputs and access to financing are critical elements for ensuring success and sustainability. Women, and especially unmarried women and women who are not closely associated with a male relative, or those who face stigma or discrimination due to various other circumstances (i.e., sexual violence survivors, single mothers, unmarried women, etc.) are often disadvantaged in regard to access to capital assets as women\u2019s ownership rights are often based on de facto agreements through male community members and traditional gender roles may prevent women and girls from accessing education and capacity building. \\n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states. Such actions should aim to use an inclusive approach that seeks to consider and respond to the needs of the entire population, especially women and youth. Bringing communities together to discuss and resolve common challenges and concerns, such as access to water points and grazing lands, can be a powerful peacebuilding tool and can help to mitigate the risk of further conflict between competing natural resource user groups.", + "Paragraph": "At the outset, there are several key risk factors to consider when looking to leverage natural resources to support DDR processes. Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development. With close attention to whether a robust framework is in place with respect to land rights, and sub-surface natural resource rights as a pre-cursor, engagement with private sector entities can help to facilitate these types of opportunities, whether for high-value natural resources or agricultural commodities with significant market value such as coffee, cocoa, grains or other soft commodities. The risk, however, is that the pressure to kick-start development and earn foreign exchange can lead to rapid, uncontrolled exploitation of such resources at sub-optimal prices, without due attention to land and sub-surface resource rights, environmental sustainability, employment creation and the equitable distribution of revenues. When the benefits are not shared, or when environmental degradation occurs as a consequence of exploitation, there could be serious potential for conflict to resume. \n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base. Environmental damage caused by conflicts, coping strategies and chronic environmental problems (including climate change impacts) that undermine livelihoods must therefore be addressed from the outset. Minimizing vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change through the management of key natural resources and the introduction of appropriate technologies may also be addressed. Women and children are often disproportionally affected by environmental contamination economically, socially as well as in terms of their health and well-being. DDR practitioners should therefore seek to address the specific needs of women and children in relation to their dependence on natural resources and risks involved. Careful coordination and attention to issues of land access, tenure and the availability of agricultural inputs and access to financing are critical elements for ensuring success and sustainability. Women, and especially unmarried women and women who are not closely associated with a male relative, or those who face stigma or discrimination due to various other circumstances (i.e., sexual violence survivors, single mothers, unmarried women, etc.) are often disadvantaged in regard to access to capital assets as women\u2019s ownership rights are often based on de facto agreements through male community members and traditional gender roles may prevent women and girls from accessing education and capacity building. \n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states. Such actions should aim to use an inclusive approach that seeks to consider and respond to the needs of the entire population, especially women and youth. Bringing communities together to discuss and resolve common challenges and concerns, such as access to water points and grazing lands, can be a powerful peacebuilding tool and can help to mitigate the risk of further conflict between competing natural resource user groups.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -212113,7 +212113,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3262, - "Paragraph": "At the outset, there are several key risk factors to consider when looking to leverage natural resources to support DDR processes. Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \\n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development. With close attention to whether a robust framework is in place with respect to land rights, and sub-surface natural resource rights as a pre-cursor, engagement with private sector entities can help to facilitate these types of opportunities, whether for high-value natural resources or agricultural commodities with significant market value such as coffee, cocoa, grains or other soft commodities. The risk, however, is that the pressure to kick-start development and earn foreign exchange can lead to rapid, uncontrolled exploitation of such resources at sub-optimal prices, without due attention to land and sub-surface resource rights, environmental sustainability, employment creation and the equitable distribution of revenues. When the benefits are not shared, or when environmental degradation occurs as a consequence of exploitation, there could be serious potential for conflict to resume. \\n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base. Environmental damage caused by conflicts, coping strategies and chronic environmental problems (including climate change impacts) that undermine livelihoods must therefore be addressed from the outset. Minimizing vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change through the management of key natural resources and the introduction of appropriate technologies may also be addressed. Women and children are often disproportionally affected by environmental contamination economically, socially as well as in terms of their health and well-being. DDR practitioners should therefore seek to address the specific needs of women and children in relation to their dependence on natural resources and risks involved. Careful coordination and attention to issues of land access, tenure and the availability of agricultural inputs and access to financing are critical elements for ensuring success and sustainability. Women, and especially unmarried women and women who are not closely associated with a male relative, or those who face stigma or discrimination due to various other circumstances (i.e., sexual violence survivors, single mothers, unmarried women, etc.) are often disadvantaged in regard to access to capital assets as women\u2019s ownership rights are often based on de facto agreements through male community members and traditional gender roles may prevent women and girls from accessing education and capacity building. \\n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states. Such actions should aim to use an inclusive approach that seeks to consider and respond to the needs of the entire population, especially women and youth. Bringing communities together to discuss and resolve common challenges and concerns, such as access to water points and grazing lands, can be a powerful peacebuilding tool and can help to mitigate the risk of further conflict between competing natural resource user groups.", + "Paragraph": "At the outset, there are several key risk factors to consider when looking to leverage natural resources to support DDR processes. Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development. With close attention to whether a robust framework is in place with respect to land rights, and sub-surface natural resource rights as a pre-cursor, engagement with private sector entities can help to facilitate these types of opportunities, whether for high-value natural resources or agricultural commodities with significant market value such as coffee, cocoa, grains or other soft commodities. The risk, however, is that the pressure to kick-start development and earn foreign exchange can lead to rapid, uncontrolled exploitation of such resources at sub-optimal prices, without due attention to land and sub-surface resource rights, environmental sustainability, employment creation and the equitable distribution of revenues. When the benefits are not shared, or when environmental degradation occurs as a consequence of exploitation, there could be serious potential for conflict to resume. \n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base. Environmental damage caused by conflicts, coping strategies and chronic environmental problems (including climate change impacts) that undermine livelihoods must therefore be addressed from the outset. Minimizing vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change through the management of key natural resources and the introduction of appropriate technologies may also be addressed. Women and children are often disproportionally affected by environmental contamination economically, socially as well as in terms of their health and well-being. DDR practitioners should therefore seek to address the specific needs of women and children in relation to their dependence on natural resources and risks involved. Careful coordination and attention to issues of land access, tenure and the availability of agricultural inputs and access to financing are critical elements for ensuring success and sustainability. Women, and especially unmarried women and women who are not closely associated with a male relative, or those who face stigma or discrimination due to various other circumstances (i.e., sexual violence survivors, single mothers, unmarried women, etc.) are often disadvantaged in regard to access to capital assets as women\u2019s ownership rights are often based on de facto agreements through male community members and traditional gender roles may prevent women and girls from accessing education and capacity building. \n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states. Such actions should aim to use an inclusive approach that seeks to consider and respond to the needs of the entire population, especially women and youth. Bringing communities together to discuss and resolve common challenges and concerns, such as access to water points and grazing lands, can be a powerful peacebuilding tool and can help to mitigate the risk of further conflict between competing natural resource user groups.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -212124,14 +212124,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \\n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development.", + "Sentence": "Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development.", "newParagraph": "outset several key risk factor consider looking leverage natural resource support ddr process depending ddr practitioner working along peace continuum following three key area risk opportunity considered n supporting economic recovery natural resource properly governed carefully managed highvalue resource hydrocarbon mineral metal stone export timber form important basis employment creation budget revenue development close attention whether robust framework place respect land right subsurface natural resource right precursor engagement private sector entity help facilitate type opportunity whether highvalue natural resource agricultural commodity significant market value coffee cocoa grain soft commodity risk however pressure kickstart development earn foreign exchange lead rapid uncontrolled exploitation resource suboptimal price without due attention land subsurface resource right environmental sustainability employment creation equitable distribution revenue benefit shared environmental degradation occurs consequence exploitation could serious potential conflict resume n developing sustainable livelihood peace sustainable peace fundamentally hinge development sustainable livelihood provision basic service recovery sound management including equitable distribution related benefit natural resource base environmental damage caused conflict coping strategy chronic environmental problem including climate change impact undermine livelihood must therefore addressed outset minimizing vulnerability natural hazard climate change management key natural resource introduction appropriate technology may also addressed woman child often disproportionally affected environmental contamination economically socially well term health wellbeing ddr practitioner therefore seek address specific need woman child relation dependence natural resource risk involved careful coordination attention issue land access tenure availability agricultural input access financing critical element ensuring success sustainability woman especially unmarried woman woman closely associated male relative face stigma discrimination due various circumstance ie sexual violence survivor single mother unmarried woman etc often disadvantaged regard access capital asset woman ownership right often based de facto agreement male community member traditional gender role may prevent woman girl accessing education capacity building n contributing dialogue reconciliation confidence building natural resource neutral entry point catalyst enhancing dialogue building confidence exploring shared interest broadening cooperation divided community well within state action aim use inclusive approach seek consider respond need entire population especially woman youth bringing community together discus resolve common challenge concern access water point grazing land powerful peacebuilding tool help mitigate risk conflict competing natural resource user group", "ProcessedSent": "depending ddr practitioner working along peace continuum following three key area risk opportunity considered n supporting economic recovery natural resource properly governed carefully managed highvalue resource hydrocarbon mineral metal stone export timber form important basis employment creation budget revenue development", "SentID": 11784 }, { "ParagraphID": 3262, - "Paragraph": "At the outset, there are several key risk factors to consider when looking to leverage natural resources to support DDR processes. Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \\n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development. With close attention to whether a robust framework is in place with respect to land rights, and sub-surface natural resource rights as a pre-cursor, engagement with private sector entities can help to facilitate these types of opportunities, whether for high-value natural resources or agricultural commodities with significant market value such as coffee, cocoa, grains or other soft commodities. The risk, however, is that the pressure to kick-start development and earn foreign exchange can lead to rapid, uncontrolled exploitation of such resources at sub-optimal prices, without due attention to land and sub-surface resource rights, environmental sustainability, employment creation and the equitable distribution of revenues. When the benefits are not shared, or when environmental degradation occurs as a consequence of exploitation, there could be serious potential for conflict to resume. \\n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base. Environmental damage caused by conflicts, coping strategies and chronic environmental problems (including climate change impacts) that undermine livelihoods must therefore be addressed from the outset. Minimizing vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change through the management of key natural resources and the introduction of appropriate technologies may also be addressed. Women and children are often disproportionally affected by environmental contamination economically, socially as well as in terms of their health and well-being. DDR practitioners should therefore seek to address the specific needs of women and children in relation to their dependence on natural resources and risks involved. Careful coordination and attention to issues of land access, tenure and the availability of agricultural inputs and access to financing are critical elements for ensuring success and sustainability. Women, and especially unmarried women and women who are not closely associated with a male relative, or those who face stigma or discrimination due to various other circumstances (i.e., sexual violence survivors, single mothers, unmarried women, etc.) are often disadvantaged in regard to access to capital assets as women\u2019s ownership rights are often based on de facto agreements through male community members and traditional gender roles may prevent women and girls from accessing education and capacity building. \\n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states. Such actions should aim to use an inclusive approach that seeks to consider and respond to the needs of the entire population, especially women and youth. Bringing communities together to discuss and resolve common challenges and concerns, such as access to water points and grazing lands, can be a powerful peacebuilding tool and can help to mitigate the risk of further conflict between competing natural resource user groups.", + "Paragraph": "At the outset, there are several key risk factors to consider when looking to leverage natural resources to support DDR processes. Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development. With close attention to whether a robust framework is in place with respect to land rights, and sub-surface natural resource rights as a pre-cursor, engagement with private sector entities can help to facilitate these types of opportunities, whether for high-value natural resources or agricultural commodities with significant market value such as coffee, cocoa, grains or other soft commodities. The risk, however, is that the pressure to kick-start development and earn foreign exchange can lead to rapid, uncontrolled exploitation of such resources at sub-optimal prices, without due attention to land and sub-surface resource rights, environmental sustainability, employment creation and the equitable distribution of revenues. When the benefits are not shared, or when environmental degradation occurs as a consequence of exploitation, there could be serious potential for conflict to resume. \n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base. Environmental damage caused by conflicts, coping strategies and chronic environmental problems (including climate change impacts) that undermine livelihoods must therefore be addressed from the outset. Minimizing vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change through the management of key natural resources and the introduction of appropriate technologies may also be addressed. Women and children are often disproportionally affected by environmental contamination economically, socially as well as in terms of their health and well-being. DDR practitioners should therefore seek to address the specific needs of women and children in relation to their dependence on natural resources and risks involved. Careful coordination and attention to issues of land access, tenure and the availability of agricultural inputs and access to financing are critical elements for ensuring success and sustainability. Women, and especially unmarried women and women who are not closely associated with a male relative, or those who face stigma or discrimination due to various other circumstances (i.e., sexual violence survivors, single mothers, unmarried women, etc.) are often disadvantaged in regard to access to capital assets as women\u2019s ownership rights are often based on de facto agreements through male community members and traditional gender roles may prevent women and girls from accessing education and capacity building. \n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states. Such actions should aim to use an inclusive approach that seeks to consider and respond to the needs of the entire population, especially women and youth. Bringing communities together to discuss and resolve common challenges and concerns, such as access to water points and grazing lands, can be a powerful peacebuilding tool and can help to mitigate the risk of further conflict between competing natural resource user groups.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -212149,7 +212149,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3262, - "Paragraph": "At the outset, there are several key risk factors to consider when looking to leverage natural resources to support DDR processes. Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \\n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development. With close attention to whether a robust framework is in place with respect to land rights, and sub-surface natural resource rights as a pre-cursor, engagement with private sector entities can help to facilitate these types of opportunities, whether for high-value natural resources or agricultural commodities with significant market value such as coffee, cocoa, grains or other soft commodities. The risk, however, is that the pressure to kick-start development and earn foreign exchange can lead to rapid, uncontrolled exploitation of such resources at sub-optimal prices, without due attention to land and sub-surface resource rights, environmental sustainability, employment creation and the equitable distribution of revenues. When the benefits are not shared, or when environmental degradation occurs as a consequence of exploitation, there could be serious potential for conflict to resume. \\n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base. Environmental damage caused by conflicts, coping strategies and chronic environmental problems (including climate change impacts) that undermine livelihoods must therefore be addressed from the outset. Minimizing vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change through the management of key natural resources and the introduction of appropriate technologies may also be addressed. Women and children are often disproportionally affected by environmental contamination economically, socially as well as in terms of their health and well-being. DDR practitioners should therefore seek to address the specific needs of women and children in relation to their dependence on natural resources and risks involved. Careful coordination and attention to issues of land access, tenure and the availability of agricultural inputs and access to financing are critical elements for ensuring success and sustainability. Women, and especially unmarried women and women who are not closely associated with a male relative, or those who face stigma or discrimination due to various other circumstances (i.e., sexual violence survivors, single mothers, unmarried women, etc.) are often disadvantaged in regard to access to capital assets as women\u2019s ownership rights are often based on de facto agreements through male community members and traditional gender roles may prevent women and girls from accessing education and capacity building. \\n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states. Such actions should aim to use an inclusive approach that seeks to consider and respond to the needs of the entire population, especially women and youth. Bringing communities together to discuss and resolve common challenges and concerns, such as access to water points and grazing lands, can be a powerful peacebuilding tool and can help to mitigate the risk of further conflict between competing natural resource user groups.", + "Paragraph": "At the outset, there are several key risk factors to consider when looking to leverage natural resources to support DDR processes. Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development. With close attention to whether a robust framework is in place with respect to land rights, and sub-surface natural resource rights as a pre-cursor, engagement with private sector entities can help to facilitate these types of opportunities, whether for high-value natural resources or agricultural commodities with significant market value such as coffee, cocoa, grains or other soft commodities. The risk, however, is that the pressure to kick-start development and earn foreign exchange can lead to rapid, uncontrolled exploitation of such resources at sub-optimal prices, without due attention to land and sub-surface resource rights, environmental sustainability, employment creation and the equitable distribution of revenues. When the benefits are not shared, or when environmental degradation occurs as a consequence of exploitation, there could be serious potential for conflict to resume. \n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base. Environmental damage caused by conflicts, coping strategies and chronic environmental problems (including climate change impacts) that undermine livelihoods must therefore be addressed from the outset. Minimizing vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change through the management of key natural resources and the introduction of appropriate technologies may also be addressed. Women and children are often disproportionally affected by environmental contamination economically, socially as well as in terms of their health and well-being. DDR practitioners should therefore seek to address the specific needs of women and children in relation to their dependence on natural resources and risks involved. Careful coordination and attention to issues of land access, tenure and the availability of agricultural inputs and access to financing are critical elements for ensuring success and sustainability. Women, and especially unmarried women and women who are not closely associated with a male relative, or those who face stigma or discrimination due to various other circumstances (i.e., sexual violence survivors, single mothers, unmarried women, etc.) are often disadvantaged in regard to access to capital assets as women\u2019s ownership rights are often based on de facto agreements through male community members and traditional gender roles may prevent women and girls from accessing education and capacity building. \n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states. Such actions should aim to use an inclusive approach that seeks to consider and respond to the needs of the entire population, especially women and youth. Bringing communities together to discuss and resolve common challenges and concerns, such as access to water points and grazing lands, can be a powerful peacebuilding tool and can help to mitigate the risk of further conflict between competing natural resource user groups.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -212167,7 +212167,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3262, - "Paragraph": "At the outset, there are several key risk factors to consider when looking to leverage natural resources to support DDR processes. Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \\n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development. With close attention to whether a robust framework is in place with respect to land rights, and sub-surface natural resource rights as a pre-cursor, engagement with private sector entities can help to facilitate these types of opportunities, whether for high-value natural resources or agricultural commodities with significant market value such as coffee, cocoa, grains or other soft commodities. The risk, however, is that the pressure to kick-start development and earn foreign exchange can lead to rapid, uncontrolled exploitation of such resources at sub-optimal prices, without due attention to land and sub-surface resource rights, environmental sustainability, employment creation and the equitable distribution of revenues. When the benefits are not shared, or when environmental degradation occurs as a consequence of exploitation, there could be serious potential for conflict to resume. \\n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base. Environmental damage caused by conflicts, coping strategies and chronic environmental problems (including climate change impacts) that undermine livelihoods must therefore be addressed from the outset. Minimizing vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change through the management of key natural resources and the introduction of appropriate technologies may also be addressed. Women and children are often disproportionally affected by environmental contamination economically, socially as well as in terms of their health and well-being. DDR practitioners should therefore seek to address the specific needs of women and children in relation to their dependence on natural resources and risks involved. Careful coordination and attention to issues of land access, tenure and the availability of agricultural inputs and access to financing are critical elements for ensuring success and sustainability. Women, and especially unmarried women and women who are not closely associated with a male relative, or those who face stigma or discrimination due to various other circumstances (i.e., sexual violence survivors, single mothers, unmarried women, etc.) are often disadvantaged in regard to access to capital assets as women\u2019s ownership rights are often based on de facto agreements through male community members and traditional gender roles may prevent women and girls from accessing education and capacity building. \\n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states. Such actions should aim to use an inclusive approach that seeks to consider and respond to the needs of the entire population, especially women and youth. Bringing communities together to discuss and resolve common challenges and concerns, such as access to water points and grazing lands, can be a powerful peacebuilding tool and can help to mitigate the risk of further conflict between competing natural resource user groups.", + "Paragraph": "At the outset, there are several key risk factors to consider when looking to leverage natural resources to support DDR processes. Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development. With close attention to whether a robust framework is in place with respect to land rights, and sub-surface natural resource rights as a pre-cursor, engagement with private sector entities can help to facilitate these types of opportunities, whether for high-value natural resources or agricultural commodities with significant market value such as coffee, cocoa, grains or other soft commodities. The risk, however, is that the pressure to kick-start development and earn foreign exchange can lead to rapid, uncontrolled exploitation of such resources at sub-optimal prices, without due attention to land and sub-surface resource rights, environmental sustainability, employment creation and the equitable distribution of revenues. When the benefits are not shared, or when environmental degradation occurs as a consequence of exploitation, there could be serious potential for conflict to resume. \n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base. Environmental damage caused by conflicts, coping strategies and chronic environmental problems (including climate change impacts) that undermine livelihoods must therefore be addressed from the outset. Minimizing vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change through the management of key natural resources and the introduction of appropriate technologies may also be addressed. Women and children are often disproportionally affected by environmental contamination economically, socially as well as in terms of their health and well-being. DDR practitioners should therefore seek to address the specific needs of women and children in relation to their dependence on natural resources and risks involved. Careful coordination and attention to issues of land access, tenure and the availability of agricultural inputs and access to financing are critical elements for ensuring success and sustainability. Women, and especially unmarried women and women who are not closely associated with a male relative, or those who face stigma or discrimination due to various other circumstances (i.e., sexual violence survivors, single mothers, unmarried women, etc.) are often disadvantaged in regard to access to capital assets as women\u2019s ownership rights are often based on de facto agreements through male community members and traditional gender roles may prevent women and girls from accessing education and capacity building. \n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states. Such actions should aim to use an inclusive approach that seeks to consider and respond to the needs of the entire population, especially women and youth. Bringing communities together to discuss and resolve common challenges and concerns, such as access to water points and grazing lands, can be a powerful peacebuilding tool and can help to mitigate the risk of further conflict between competing natural resource user groups.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -212185,7 +212185,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3262, - "Paragraph": "At the outset, there are several key risk factors to consider when looking to leverage natural resources to support DDR processes. Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \\n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development. With close attention to whether a robust framework is in place with respect to land rights, and sub-surface natural resource rights as a pre-cursor, engagement with private sector entities can help to facilitate these types of opportunities, whether for high-value natural resources or agricultural commodities with significant market value such as coffee, cocoa, grains or other soft commodities. The risk, however, is that the pressure to kick-start development and earn foreign exchange can lead to rapid, uncontrolled exploitation of such resources at sub-optimal prices, without due attention to land and sub-surface resource rights, environmental sustainability, employment creation and the equitable distribution of revenues. When the benefits are not shared, or when environmental degradation occurs as a consequence of exploitation, there could be serious potential for conflict to resume. \\n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base. Environmental damage caused by conflicts, coping strategies and chronic environmental problems (including climate change impacts) that undermine livelihoods must therefore be addressed from the outset. Minimizing vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change through the management of key natural resources and the introduction of appropriate technologies may also be addressed. Women and children are often disproportionally affected by environmental contamination economically, socially as well as in terms of their health and well-being. DDR practitioners should therefore seek to address the specific needs of women and children in relation to their dependence on natural resources and risks involved. Careful coordination and attention to issues of land access, tenure and the availability of agricultural inputs and access to financing are critical elements for ensuring success and sustainability. Women, and especially unmarried women and women who are not closely associated with a male relative, or those who face stigma or discrimination due to various other circumstances (i.e., sexual violence survivors, single mothers, unmarried women, etc.) are often disadvantaged in regard to access to capital assets as women\u2019s ownership rights are often based on de facto agreements through male community members and traditional gender roles may prevent women and girls from accessing education and capacity building. \\n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states. Such actions should aim to use an inclusive approach that seeks to consider and respond to the needs of the entire population, especially women and youth. Bringing communities together to discuss and resolve common challenges and concerns, such as access to water points and grazing lands, can be a powerful peacebuilding tool and can help to mitigate the risk of further conflict between competing natural resource user groups.", + "Paragraph": "At the outset, there are several key risk factors to consider when looking to leverage natural resources to support DDR processes. Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development. With close attention to whether a robust framework is in place with respect to land rights, and sub-surface natural resource rights as a pre-cursor, engagement with private sector entities can help to facilitate these types of opportunities, whether for high-value natural resources or agricultural commodities with significant market value such as coffee, cocoa, grains or other soft commodities. The risk, however, is that the pressure to kick-start development and earn foreign exchange can lead to rapid, uncontrolled exploitation of such resources at sub-optimal prices, without due attention to land and sub-surface resource rights, environmental sustainability, employment creation and the equitable distribution of revenues. When the benefits are not shared, or when environmental degradation occurs as a consequence of exploitation, there could be serious potential for conflict to resume. \n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base. Environmental damage caused by conflicts, coping strategies and chronic environmental problems (including climate change impacts) that undermine livelihoods must therefore be addressed from the outset. Minimizing vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change through the management of key natural resources and the introduction of appropriate technologies may also be addressed. Women and children are often disproportionally affected by environmental contamination economically, socially as well as in terms of their health and well-being. DDR practitioners should therefore seek to address the specific needs of women and children in relation to their dependence on natural resources and risks involved. Careful coordination and attention to issues of land access, tenure and the availability of agricultural inputs and access to financing are critical elements for ensuring success and sustainability. Women, and especially unmarried women and women who are not closely associated with a male relative, or those who face stigma or discrimination due to various other circumstances (i.e., sexual violence survivors, single mothers, unmarried women, etc.) are often disadvantaged in regard to access to capital assets as women\u2019s ownership rights are often based on de facto agreements through male community members and traditional gender roles may prevent women and girls from accessing education and capacity building. \n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states. Such actions should aim to use an inclusive approach that seeks to consider and respond to the needs of the entire population, especially women and youth. Bringing communities together to discuss and resolve common challenges and concerns, such as access to water points and grazing lands, can be a powerful peacebuilding tool and can help to mitigate the risk of further conflict between competing natural resource user groups.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -212196,14 +212196,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base.", + "Sentence": "\n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base.", "newParagraph": "outset several key risk factor consider looking leverage natural resource support ddr process depending ddr practitioner working along peace continuum following three key area risk opportunity considered n supporting economic recovery natural resource properly governed carefully managed highvalue resource hydrocarbon mineral metal stone export timber form important basis employment creation budget revenue development close attention whether robust framework place respect land right subsurface natural resource right precursor engagement private sector entity help facilitate type opportunity whether highvalue natural resource agricultural commodity significant market value coffee cocoa grain soft commodity risk however pressure kickstart development earn foreign exchange lead rapid uncontrolled exploitation resource suboptimal price without due attention land subsurface resource right environmental sustainability employment creation equitable distribution revenue benefit shared environmental degradation occurs consequence exploitation could serious potential conflict resume n developing sustainable livelihood peace sustainable peace fundamentally hinge development sustainable livelihood provision basic service recovery sound management including equitable distribution related benefit natural resource base environmental damage caused conflict coping strategy chronic environmental problem including climate change impact undermine livelihood must therefore addressed outset minimizing vulnerability natural hazard climate change management key natural resource introduction appropriate technology may also addressed woman child often disproportionally affected environmental contamination economically socially well term health wellbeing ddr practitioner therefore seek address specific need woman child relation dependence natural resource risk involved careful coordination attention issue land access tenure availability agricultural input access financing critical element ensuring success sustainability woman especially unmarried woman woman closely associated male relative face stigma discrimination due various circumstance ie sexual violence survivor single mother unmarried woman etc often disadvantaged regard access capital asset woman ownership right often based de facto agreement male community member traditional gender role may prevent woman girl accessing education capacity building n contributing dialogue reconciliation confidence building natural resource neutral entry point catalyst enhancing dialogue building confidence exploring shared interest broadening cooperation divided community well within state action aim use inclusive approach seek consider respond need entire population especially woman youth bringing community together discus resolve common challenge concern access water point grazing land powerful peacebuilding tool help mitigate risk conflict competing natural resource user group", "ProcessedSent": "n developing sustainable livelihood peace sustainable peace fundamentally hinge development sustainable livelihood provision basic service recovery sound management including equitable distribution related benefit natural resource base", "SentID": 11788 }, { "ParagraphID": 3262, - "Paragraph": "At the outset, there are several key risk factors to consider when looking to leverage natural resources to support DDR processes. Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \\n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development. With close attention to whether a robust framework is in place with respect to land rights, and sub-surface natural resource rights as a pre-cursor, engagement with private sector entities can help to facilitate these types of opportunities, whether for high-value natural resources or agricultural commodities with significant market value such as coffee, cocoa, grains or other soft commodities. The risk, however, is that the pressure to kick-start development and earn foreign exchange can lead to rapid, uncontrolled exploitation of such resources at sub-optimal prices, without due attention to land and sub-surface resource rights, environmental sustainability, employment creation and the equitable distribution of revenues. When the benefits are not shared, or when environmental degradation occurs as a consequence of exploitation, there could be serious potential for conflict to resume. \\n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base. Environmental damage caused by conflicts, coping strategies and chronic environmental problems (including climate change impacts) that undermine livelihoods must therefore be addressed from the outset. Minimizing vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change through the management of key natural resources and the introduction of appropriate technologies may also be addressed. Women and children are often disproportionally affected by environmental contamination economically, socially as well as in terms of their health and well-being. DDR practitioners should therefore seek to address the specific needs of women and children in relation to their dependence on natural resources and risks involved. Careful coordination and attention to issues of land access, tenure and the availability of agricultural inputs and access to financing are critical elements for ensuring success and sustainability. Women, and especially unmarried women and women who are not closely associated with a male relative, or those who face stigma or discrimination due to various other circumstances (i.e., sexual violence survivors, single mothers, unmarried women, etc.) are often disadvantaged in regard to access to capital assets as women\u2019s ownership rights are often based on de facto agreements through male community members and traditional gender roles may prevent women and girls from accessing education and capacity building. \\n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states. Such actions should aim to use an inclusive approach that seeks to consider and respond to the needs of the entire population, especially women and youth. Bringing communities together to discuss and resolve common challenges and concerns, such as access to water points and grazing lands, can be a powerful peacebuilding tool and can help to mitigate the risk of further conflict between competing natural resource user groups.", + "Paragraph": "At the outset, there are several key risk factors to consider when looking to leverage natural resources to support DDR processes. Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development. With close attention to whether a robust framework is in place with respect to land rights, and sub-surface natural resource rights as a pre-cursor, engagement with private sector entities can help to facilitate these types of opportunities, whether for high-value natural resources or agricultural commodities with significant market value such as coffee, cocoa, grains or other soft commodities. The risk, however, is that the pressure to kick-start development and earn foreign exchange can lead to rapid, uncontrolled exploitation of such resources at sub-optimal prices, without due attention to land and sub-surface resource rights, environmental sustainability, employment creation and the equitable distribution of revenues. When the benefits are not shared, or when environmental degradation occurs as a consequence of exploitation, there could be serious potential for conflict to resume. \n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base. Environmental damage caused by conflicts, coping strategies and chronic environmental problems (including climate change impacts) that undermine livelihoods must therefore be addressed from the outset. Minimizing vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change through the management of key natural resources and the introduction of appropriate technologies may also be addressed. Women and children are often disproportionally affected by environmental contamination economically, socially as well as in terms of their health and well-being. DDR practitioners should therefore seek to address the specific needs of women and children in relation to their dependence on natural resources and risks involved. Careful coordination and attention to issues of land access, tenure and the availability of agricultural inputs and access to financing are critical elements for ensuring success and sustainability. Women, and especially unmarried women and women who are not closely associated with a male relative, or those who face stigma or discrimination due to various other circumstances (i.e., sexual violence survivors, single mothers, unmarried women, etc.) are often disadvantaged in regard to access to capital assets as women\u2019s ownership rights are often based on de facto agreements through male community members and traditional gender roles may prevent women and girls from accessing education and capacity building. \n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states. Such actions should aim to use an inclusive approach that seeks to consider and respond to the needs of the entire population, especially women and youth. Bringing communities together to discuss and resolve common challenges and concerns, such as access to water points and grazing lands, can be a powerful peacebuilding tool and can help to mitigate the risk of further conflict between competing natural resource user groups.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -212221,7 +212221,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3262, - "Paragraph": "At the outset, there are several key risk factors to consider when looking to leverage natural resources to support DDR processes. Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \\n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development. With close attention to whether a robust framework is in place with respect to land rights, and sub-surface natural resource rights as a pre-cursor, engagement with private sector entities can help to facilitate these types of opportunities, whether for high-value natural resources or agricultural commodities with significant market value such as coffee, cocoa, grains or other soft commodities. The risk, however, is that the pressure to kick-start development and earn foreign exchange can lead to rapid, uncontrolled exploitation of such resources at sub-optimal prices, without due attention to land and sub-surface resource rights, environmental sustainability, employment creation and the equitable distribution of revenues. When the benefits are not shared, or when environmental degradation occurs as a consequence of exploitation, there could be serious potential for conflict to resume. \\n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base. Environmental damage caused by conflicts, coping strategies and chronic environmental problems (including climate change impacts) that undermine livelihoods must therefore be addressed from the outset. Minimizing vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change through the management of key natural resources and the introduction of appropriate technologies may also be addressed. Women and children are often disproportionally affected by environmental contamination economically, socially as well as in terms of their health and well-being. DDR practitioners should therefore seek to address the specific needs of women and children in relation to their dependence on natural resources and risks involved. Careful coordination and attention to issues of land access, tenure and the availability of agricultural inputs and access to financing are critical elements for ensuring success and sustainability. Women, and especially unmarried women and women who are not closely associated with a male relative, or those who face stigma or discrimination due to various other circumstances (i.e., sexual violence survivors, single mothers, unmarried women, etc.) are often disadvantaged in regard to access to capital assets as women\u2019s ownership rights are often based on de facto agreements through male community members and traditional gender roles may prevent women and girls from accessing education and capacity building. \\n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states. Such actions should aim to use an inclusive approach that seeks to consider and respond to the needs of the entire population, especially women and youth. Bringing communities together to discuss and resolve common challenges and concerns, such as access to water points and grazing lands, can be a powerful peacebuilding tool and can help to mitigate the risk of further conflict between competing natural resource user groups.", + "Paragraph": "At the outset, there are several key risk factors to consider when looking to leverage natural resources to support DDR processes. Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development. With close attention to whether a robust framework is in place with respect to land rights, and sub-surface natural resource rights as a pre-cursor, engagement with private sector entities can help to facilitate these types of opportunities, whether for high-value natural resources or agricultural commodities with significant market value such as coffee, cocoa, grains or other soft commodities. The risk, however, is that the pressure to kick-start development and earn foreign exchange can lead to rapid, uncontrolled exploitation of such resources at sub-optimal prices, without due attention to land and sub-surface resource rights, environmental sustainability, employment creation and the equitable distribution of revenues. When the benefits are not shared, or when environmental degradation occurs as a consequence of exploitation, there could be serious potential for conflict to resume. \n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base. Environmental damage caused by conflicts, coping strategies and chronic environmental problems (including climate change impacts) that undermine livelihoods must therefore be addressed from the outset. Minimizing vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change through the management of key natural resources and the introduction of appropriate technologies may also be addressed. Women and children are often disproportionally affected by environmental contamination economically, socially as well as in terms of their health and well-being. DDR practitioners should therefore seek to address the specific needs of women and children in relation to their dependence on natural resources and risks involved. Careful coordination and attention to issues of land access, tenure and the availability of agricultural inputs and access to financing are critical elements for ensuring success and sustainability. Women, and especially unmarried women and women who are not closely associated with a male relative, or those who face stigma or discrimination due to various other circumstances (i.e., sexual violence survivors, single mothers, unmarried women, etc.) are often disadvantaged in regard to access to capital assets as women\u2019s ownership rights are often based on de facto agreements through male community members and traditional gender roles may prevent women and girls from accessing education and capacity building. \n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states. Such actions should aim to use an inclusive approach that seeks to consider and respond to the needs of the entire population, especially women and youth. Bringing communities together to discuss and resolve common challenges and concerns, such as access to water points and grazing lands, can be a powerful peacebuilding tool and can help to mitigate the risk of further conflict between competing natural resource user groups.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -212239,7 +212239,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3262, - "Paragraph": "At the outset, there are several key risk factors to consider when looking to leverage natural resources to support DDR processes. Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \\n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development. With close attention to whether a robust framework is in place with respect to land rights, and sub-surface natural resource rights as a pre-cursor, engagement with private sector entities can help to facilitate these types of opportunities, whether for high-value natural resources or agricultural commodities with significant market value such as coffee, cocoa, grains or other soft commodities. The risk, however, is that the pressure to kick-start development and earn foreign exchange can lead to rapid, uncontrolled exploitation of such resources at sub-optimal prices, without due attention to land and sub-surface resource rights, environmental sustainability, employment creation and the equitable distribution of revenues. When the benefits are not shared, or when environmental degradation occurs as a consequence of exploitation, there could be serious potential for conflict to resume. \\n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base. Environmental damage caused by conflicts, coping strategies and chronic environmental problems (including climate change impacts) that undermine livelihoods must therefore be addressed from the outset. Minimizing vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change through the management of key natural resources and the introduction of appropriate technologies may also be addressed. Women and children are often disproportionally affected by environmental contamination economically, socially as well as in terms of their health and well-being. DDR practitioners should therefore seek to address the specific needs of women and children in relation to their dependence on natural resources and risks involved. Careful coordination and attention to issues of land access, tenure and the availability of agricultural inputs and access to financing are critical elements for ensuring success and sustainability. Women, and especially unmarried women and women who are not closely associated with a male relative, or those who face stigma or discrimination due to various other circumstances (i.e., sexual violence survivors, single mothers, unmarried women, etc.) are often disadvantaged in regard to access to capital assets as women\u2019s ownership rights are often based on de facto agreements through male community members and traditional gender roles may prevent women and girls from accessing education and capacity building. \\n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states. Such actions should aim to use an inclusive approach that seeks to consider and respond to the needs of the entire population, especially women and youth. Bringing communities together to discuss and resolve common challenges and concerns, such as access to water points and grazing lands, can be a powerful peacebuilding tool and can help to mitigate the risk of further conflict between competing natural resource user groups.", + "Paragraph": "At the outset, there are several key risk factors to consider when looking to leverage natural resources to support DDR processes. Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development. With close attention to whether a robust framework is in place with respect to land rights, and sub-surface natural resource rights as a pre-cursor, engagement with private sector entities can help to facilitate these types of opportunities, whether for high-value natural resources or agricultural commodities with significant market value such as coffee, cocoa, grains or other soft commodities. The risk, however, is that the pressure to kick-start development and earn foreign exchange can lead to rapid, uncontrolled exploitation of such resources at sub-optimal prices, without due attention to land and sub-surface resource rights, environmental sustainability, employment creation and the equitable distribution of revenues. When the benefits are not shared, or when environmental degradation occurs as a consequence of exploitation, there could be serious potential for conflict to resume. \n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base. Environmental damage caused by conflicts, coping strategies and chronic environmental problems (including climate change impacts) that undermine livelihoods must therefore be addressed from the outset. Minimizing vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change through the management of key natural resources and the introduction of appropriate technologies may also be addressed. Women and children are often disproportionally affected by environmental contamination economically, socially as well as in terms of their health and well-being. DDR practitioners should therefore seek to address the specific needs of women and children in relation to their dependence on natural resources and risks involved. Careful coordination and attention to issues of land access, tenure and the availability of agricultural inputs and access to financing are critical elements for ensuring success and sustainability. Women, and especially unmarried women and women who are not closely associated with a male relative, or those who face stigma or discrimination due to various other circumstances (i.e., sexual violence survivors, single mothers, unmarried women, etc.) are often disadvantaged in regard to access to capital assets as women\u2019s ownership rights are often based on de facto agreements through male community members and traditional gender roles may prevent women and girls from accessing education and capacity building. \n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states. Such actions should aim to use an inclusive approach that seeks to consider and respond to the needs of the entire population, especially women and youth. Bringing communities together to discuss and resolve common challenges and concerns, such as access to water points and grazing lands, can be a powerful peacebuilding tool and can help to mitigate the risk of further conflict between competing natural resource user groups.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -212257,7 +212257,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3262, - "Paragraph": "At the outset, there are several key risk factors to consider when looking to leverage natural resources to support DDR processes. Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \\n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development. With close attention to whether a robust framework is in place with respect to land rights, and sub-surface natural resource rights as a pre-cursor, engagement with private sector entities can help to facilitate these types of opportunities, whether for high-value natural resources or agricultural commodities with significant market value such as coffee, cocoa, grains or other soft commodities. The risk, however, is that the pressure to kick-start development and earn foreign exchange can lead to rapid, uncontrolled exploitation of such resources at sub-optimal prices, without due attention to land and sub-surface resource rights, environmental sustainability, employment creation and the equitable distribution of revenues. When the benefits are not shared, or when environmental degradation occurs as a consequence of exploitation, there could be serious potential for conflict to resume. \\n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base. Environmental damage caused by conflicts, coping strategies and chronic environmental problems (including climate change impacts) that undermine livelihoods must therefore be addressed from the outset. Minimizing vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change through the management of key natural resources and the introduction of appropriate technologies may also be addressed. Women and children are often disproportionally affected by environmental contamination economically, socially as well as in terms of their health and well-being. DDR practitioners should therefore seek to address the specific needs of women and children in relation to their dependence on natural resources and risks involved. Careful coordination and attention to issues of land access, tenure and the availability of agricultural inputs and access to financing are critical elements for ensuring success and sustainability. Women, and especially unmarried women and women who are not closely associated with a male relative, or those who face stigma or discrimination due to various other circumstances (i.e., sexual violence survivors, single mothers, unmarried women, etc.) are often disadvantaged in regard to access to capital assets as women\u2019s ownership rights are often based on de facto agreements through male community members and traditional gender roles may prevent women and girls from accessing education and capacity building. \\n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states. Such actions should aim to use an inclusive approach that seeks to consider and respond to the needs of the entire population, especially women and youth. Bringing communities together to discuss and resolve common challenges and concerns, such as access to water points and grazing lands, can be a powerful peacebuilding tool and can help to mitigate the risk of further conflict between competing natural resource user groups.", + "Paragraph": "At the outset, there are several key risk factors to consider when looking to leverage natural resources to support DDR processes. Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development. With close attention to whether a robust framework is in place with respect to land rights, and sub-surface natural resource rights as a pre-cursor, engagement with private sector entities can help to facilitate these types of opportunities, whether for high-value natural resources or agricultural commodities with significant market value such as coffee, cocoa, grains or other soft commodities. The risk, however, is that the pressure to kick-start development and earn foreign exchange can lead to rapid, uncontrolled exploitation of such resources at sub-optimal prices, without due attention to land and sub-surface resource rights, environmental sustainability, employment creation and the equitable distribution of revenues. When the benefits are not shared, or when environmental degradation occurs as a consequence of exploitation, there could be serious potential for conflict to resume. \n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base. Environmental damage caused by conflicts, coping strategies and chronic environmental problems (including climate change impacts) that undermine livelihoods must therefore be addressed from the outset. Minimizing vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change through the management of key natural resources and the introduction of appropriate technologies may also be addressed. Women and children are often disproportionally affected by environmental contamination economically, socially as well as in terms of their health and well-being. DDR practitioners should therefore seek to address the specific needs of women and children in relation to their dependence on natural resources and risks involved. Careful coordination and attention to issues of land access, tenure and the availability of agricultural inputs and access to financing are critical elements for ensuring success and sustainability. Women, and especially unmarried women and women who are not closely associated with a male relative, or those who face stigma or discrimination due to various other circumstances (i.e., sexual violence survivors, single mothers, unmarried women, etc.) are often disadvantaged in regard to access to capital assets as women\u2019s ownership rights are often based on de facto agreements through male community members and traditional gender roles may prevent women and girls from accessing education and capacity building. \n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states. Such actions should aim to use an inclusive approach that seeks to consider and respond to the needs of the entire population, especially women and youth. Bringing communities together to discuss and resolve common challenges and concerns, such as access to water points and grazing lands, can be a powerful peacebuilding tool and can help to mitigate the risk of further conflict between competing natural resource user groups.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -212275,7 +212275,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3262, - "Paragraph": "At the outset, there are several key risk factors to consider when looking to leverage natural resources to support DDR processes. Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \\n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development. With close attention to whether a robust framework is in place with respect to land rights, and sub-surface natural resource rights as a pre-cursor, engagement with private sector entities can help to facilitate these types of opportunities, whether for high-value natural resources or agricultural commodities with significant market value such as coffee, cocoa, grains or other soft commodities. The risk, however, is that the pressure to kick-start development and earn foreign exchange can lead to rapid, uncontrolled exploitation of such resources at sub-optimal prices, without due attention to land and sub-surface resource rights, environmental sustainability, employment creation and the equitable distribution of revenues. When the benefits are not shared, or when environmental degradation occurs as a consequence of exploitation, there could be serious potential for conflict to resume. \\n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base. Environmental damage caused by conflicts, coping strategies and chronic environmental problems (including climate change impacts) that undermine livelihoods must therefore be addressed from the outset. Minimizing vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change through the management of key natural resources and the introduction of appropriate technologies may also be addressed. Women and children are often disproportionally affected by environmental contamination economically, socially as well as in terms of their health and well-being. DDR practitioners should therefore seek to address the specific needs of women and children in relation to their dependence on natural resources and risks involved. Careful coordination and attention to issues of land access, tenure and the availability of agricultural inputs and access to financing are critical elements for ensuring success and sustainability. Women, and especially unmarried women and women who are not closely associated with a male relative, or those who face stigma or discrimination due to various other circumstances (i.e., sexual violence survivors, single mothers, unmarried women, etc.) are often disadvantaged in regard to access to capital assets as women\u2019s ownership rights are often based on de facto agreements through male community members and traditional gender roles may prevent women and girls from accessing education and capacity building. \\n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states. Such actions should aim to use an inclusive approach that seeks to consider and respond to the needs of the entire population, especially women and youth. Bringing communities together to discuss and resolve common challenges and concerns, such as access to water points and grazing lands, can be a powerful peacebuilding tool and can help to mitigate the risk of further conflict between competing natural resource user groups.", + "Paragraph": "At the outset, there are several key risk factors to consider when looking to leverage natural resources to support DDR processes. Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development. With close attention to whether a robust framework is in place with respect to land rights, and sub-surface natural resource rights as a pre-cursor, engagement with private sector entities can help to facilitate these types of opportunities, whether for high-value natural resources or agricultural commodities with significant market value such as coffee, cocoa, grains or other soft commodities. The risk, however, is that the pressure to kick-start development and earn foreign exchange can lead to rapid, uncontrolled exploitation of such resources at sub-optimal prices, without due attention to land and sub-surface resource rights, environmental sustainability, employment creation and the equitable distribution of revenues. When the benefits are not shared, or when environmental degradation occurs as a consequence of exploitation, there could be serious potential for conflict to resume. \n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base. Environmental damage caused by conflicts, coping strategies and chronic environmental problems (including climate change impacts) that undermine livelihoods must therefore be addressed from the outset. Minimizing vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change through the management of key natural resources and the introduction of appropriate technologies may also be addressed. Women and children are often disproportionally affected by environmental contamination economically, socially as well as in terms of their health and well-being. DDR practitioners should therefore seek to address the specific needs of women and children in relation to their dependence on natural resources and risks involved. Careful coordination and attention to issues of land access, tenure and the availability of agricultural inputs and access to financing are critical elements for ensuring success and sustainability. Women, and especially unmarried women and women who are not closely associated with a male relative, or those who face stigma or discrimination due to various other circumstances (i.e., sexual violence survivors, single mothers, unmarried women, etc.) are often disadvantaged in regard to access to capital assets as women\u2019s ownership rights are often based on de facto agreements through male community members and traditional gender roles may prevent women and girls from accessing education and capacity building. \n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states. Such actions should aim to use an inclusive approach that seeks to consider and respond to the needs of the entire population, especially women and youth. Bringing communities together to discuss and resolve common challenges and concerns, such as access to water points and grazing lands, can be a powerful peacebuilding tool and can help to mitigate the risk of further conflict between competing natural resource user groups.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -212293,7 +212293,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3262, - "Paragraph": "At the outset, there are several key risk factors to consider when looking to leverage natural resources to support DDR processes. Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \\n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development. With close attention to whether a robust framework is in place with respect to land rights, and sub-surface natural resource rights as a pre-cursor, engagement with private sector entities can help to facilitate these types of opportunities, whether for high-value natural resources or agricultural commodities with significant market value such as coffee, cocoa, grains or other soft commodities. The risk, however, is that the pressure to kick-start development and earn foreign exchange can lead to rapid, uncontrolled exploitation of such resources at sub-optimal prices, without due attention to land and sub-surface resource rights, environmental sustainability, employment creation and the equitable distribution of revenues. When the benefits are not shared, or when environmental degradation occurs as a consequence of exploitation, there could be serious potential for conflict to resume. \\n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base. Environmental damage caused by conflicts, coping strategies and chronic environmental problems (including climate change impacts) that undermine livelihoods must therefore be addressed from the outset. Minimizing vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change through the management of key natural resources and the introduction of appropriate technologies may also be addressed. Women and children are often disproportionally affected by environmental contamination economically, socially as well as in terms of their health and well-being. DDR practitioners should therefore seek to address the specific needs of women and children in relation to their dependence on natural resources and risks involved. Careful coordination and attention to issues of land access, tenure and the availability of agricultural inputs and access to financing are critical elements for ensuring success and sustainability. Women, and especially unmarried women and women who are not closely associated with a male relative, or those who face stigma or discrimination due to various other circumstances (i.e., sexual violence survivors, single mothers, unmarried women, etc.) are often disadvantaged in regard to access to capital assets as women\u2019s ownership rights are often based on de facto agreements through male community members and traditional gender roles may prevent women and girls from accessing education and capacity building. \\n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states. Such actions should aim to use an inclusive approach that seeks to consider and respond to the needs of the entire population, especially women and youth. Bringing communities together to discuss and resolve common challenges and concerns, such as access to water points and grazing lands, can be a powerful peacebuilding tool and can help to mitigate the risk of further conflict between competing natural resource user groups.", + "Paragraph": "At the outset, there are several key risk factors to consider when looking to leverage natural resources to support DDR processes. Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development. With close attention to whether a robust framework is in place with respect to land rights, and sub-surface natural resource rights as a pre-cursor, engagement with private sector entities can help to facilitate these types of opportunities, whether for high-value natural resources or agricultural commodities with significant market value such as coffee, cocoa, grains or other soft commodities. The risk, however, is that the pressure to kick-start development and earn foreign exchange can lead to rapid, uncontrolled exploitation of such resources at sub-optimal prices, without due attention to land and sub-surface resource rights, environmental sustainability, employment creation and the equitable distribution of revenues. When the benefits are not shared, or when environmental degradation occurs as a consequence of exploitation, there could be serious potential for conflict to resume. \n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base. Environmental damage caused by conflicts, coping strategies and chronic environmental problems (including climate change impacts) that undermine livelihoods must therefore be addressed from the outset. Minimizing vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change through the management of key natural resources and the introduction of appropriate technologies may also be addressed. Women and children are often disproportionally affected by environmental contamination economically, socially as well as in terms of their health and well-being. DDR practitioners should therefore seek to address the specific needs of women and children in relation to their dependence on natural resources and risks involved. Careful coordination and attention to issues of land access, tenure and the availability of agricultural inputs and access to financing are critical elements for ensuring success and sustainability. Women, and especially unmarried women and women who are not closely associated with a male relative, or those who face stigma or discrimination due to various other circumstances (i.e., sexual violence survivors, single mothers, unmarried women, etc.) are often disadvantaged in regard to access to capital assets as women\u2019s ownership rights are often based on de facto agreements through male community members and traditional gender roles may prevent women and girls from accessing education and capacity building. \n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states. Such actions should aim to use an inclusive approach that seeks to consider and respond to the needs of the entire population, especially women and youth. Bringing communities together to discuss and resolve common challenges and concerns, such as access to water points and grazing lands, can be a powerful peacebuilding tool and can help to mitigate the risk of further conflict between competing natural resource user groups.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -212311,7 +212311,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3262, - "Paragraph": "At the outset, there are several key risk factors to consider when looking to leverage natural resources to support DDR processes. Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \\n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development. With close attention to whether a robust framework is in place with respect to land rights, and sub-surface natural resource rights as a pre-cursor, engagement with private sector entities can help to facilitate these types of opportunities, whether for high-value natural resources or agricultural commodities with significant market value such as coffee, cocoa, grains or other soft commodities. The risk, however, is that the pressure to kick-start development and earn foreign exchange can lead to rapid, uncontrolled exploitation of such resources at sub-optimal prices, without due attention to land and sub-surface resource rights, environmental sustainability, employment creation and the equitable distribution of revenues. When the benefits are not shared, or when environmental degradation occurs as a consequence of exploitation, there could be serious potential for conflict to resume. \\n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base. Environmental damage caused by conflicts, coping strategies and chronic environmental problems (including climate change impacts) that undermine livelihoods must therefore be addressed from the outset. Minimizing vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change through the management of key natural resources and the introduction of appropriate technologies may also be addressed. Women and children are often disproportionally affected by environmental contamination economically, socially as well as in terms of their health and well-being. DDR practitioners should therefore seek to address the specific needs of women and children in relation to their dependence on natural resources and risks involved. Careful coordination and attention to issues of land access, tenure and the availability of agricultural inputs and access to financing are critical elements for ensuring success and sustainability. Women, and especially unmarried women and women who are not closely associated with a male relative, or those who face stigma or discrimination due to various other circumstances (i.e., sexual violence survivors, single mothers, unmarried women, etc.) are often disadvantaged in regard to access to capital assets as women\u2019s ownership rights are often based on de facto agreements through male community members and traditional gender roles may prevent women and girls from accessing education and capacity building. \\n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states. Such actions should aim to use an inclusive approach that seeks to consider and respond to the needs of the entire population, especially women and youth. Bringing communities together to discuss and resolve common challenges and concerns, such as access to water points and grazing lands, can be a powerful peacebuilding tool and can help to mitigate the risk of further conflict between competing natural resource user groups.", + "Paragraph": "At the outset, there are several key risk factors to consider when looking to leverage natural resources to support DDR processes. Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development. With close attention to whether a robust framework is in place with respect to land rights, and sub-surface natural resource rights as a pre-cursor, engagement with private sector entities can help to facilitate these types of opportunities, whether for high-value natural resources or agricultural commodities with significant market value such as coffee, cocoa, grains or other soft commodities. The risk, however, is that the pressure to kick-start development and earn foreign exchange can lead to rapid, uncontrolled exploitation of such resources at sub-optimal prices, without due attention to land and sub-surface resource rights, environmental sustainability, employment creation and the equitable distribution of revenues. When the benefits are not shared, or when environmental degradation occurs as a consequence of exploitation, there could be serious potential for conflict to resume. \n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base. Environmental damage caused by conflicts, coping strategies and chronic environmental problems (including climate change impacts) that undermine livelihoods must therefore be addressed from the outset. Minimizing vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change through the management of key natural resources and the introduction of appropriate technologies may also be addressed. Women and children are often disproportionally affected by environmental contamination economically, socially as well as in terms of their health and well-being. DDR practitioners should therefore seek to address the specific needs of women and children in relation to their dependence on natural resources and risks involved. Careful coordination and attention to issues of land access, tenure and the availability of agricultural inputs and access to financing are critical elements for ensuring success and sustainability. Women, and especially unmarried women and women who are not closely associated with a male relative, or those who face stigma or discrimination due to various other circumstances (i.e., sexual violence survivors, single mothers, unmarried women, etc.) are often disadvantaged in regard to access to capital assets as women\u2019s ownership rights are often based on de facto agreements through male community members and traditional gender roles may prevent women and girls from accessing education and capacity building. \n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states. Such actions should aim to use an inclusive approach that seeks to consider and respond to the needs of the entire population, especially women and youth. Bringing communities together to discuss and resolve common challenges and concerns, such as access to water points and grazing lands, can be a powerful peacebuilding tool and can help to mitigate the risk of further conflict between competing natural resource user groups.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -212329,7 +212329,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3262, - "Paragraph": "At the outset, there are several key risk factors to consider when looking to leverage natural resources to support DDR processes. Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \\n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development. With close attention to whether a robust framework is in place with respect to land rights, and sub-surface natural resource rights as a pre-cursor, engagement with private sector entities can help to facilitate these types of opportunities, whether for high-value natural resources or agricultural commodities with significant market value such as coffee, cocoa, grains or other soft commodities. The risk, however, is that the pressure to kick-start development and earn foreign exchange can lead to rapid, uncontrolled exploitation of such resources at sub-optimal prices, without due attention to land and sub-surface resource rights, environmental sustainability, employment creation and the equitable distribution of revenues. When the benefits are not shared, or when environmental degradation occurs as a consequence of exploitation, there could be serious potential for conflict to resume. \\n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base. Environmental damage caused by conflicts, coping strategies and chronic environmental problems (including climate change impacts) that undermine livelihoods must therefore be addressed from the outset. Minimizing vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change through the management of key natural resources and the introduction of appropriate technologies may also be addressed. Women and children are often disproportionally affected by environmental contamination economically, socially as well as in terms of their health and well-being. DDR practitioners should therefore seek to address the specific needs of women and children in relation to their dependence on natural resources and risks involved. Careful coordination and attention to issues of land access, tenure and the availability of agricultural inputs and access to financing are critical elements for ensuring success and sustainability. Women, and especially unmarried women and women who are not closely associated with a male relative, or those who face stigma or discrimination due to various other circumstances (i.e., sexual violence survivors, single mothers, unmarried women, etc.) are often disadvantaged in regard to access to capital assets as women\u2019s ownership rights are often based on de facto agreements through male community members and traditional gender roles may prevent women and girls from accessing education and capacity building. \\n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states. Such actions should aim to use an inclusive approach that seeks to consider and respond to the needs of the entire population, especially women and youth. Bringing communities together to discuss and resolve common challenges and concerns, such as access to water points and grazing lands, can be a powerful peacebuilding tool and can help to mitigate the risk of further conflict between competing natural resource user groups.", + "Paragraph": "At the outset, there are several key risk factors to consider when looking to leverage natural resources to support DDR processes. Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development. With close attention to whether a robust framework is in place with respect to land rights, and sub-surface natural resource rights as a pre-cursor, engagement with private sector entities can help to facilitate these types of opportunities, whether for high-value natural resources or agricultural commodities with significant market value such as coffee, cocoa, grains or other soft commodities. The risk, however, is that the pressure to kick-start development and earn foreign exchange can lead to rapid, uncontrolled exploitation of such resources at sub-optimal prices, without due attention to land and sub-surface resource rights, environmental sustainability, employment creation and the equitable distribution of revenues. When the benefits are not shared, or when environmental degradation occurs as a consequence of exploitation, there could be serious potential for conflict to resume. \n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base. Environmental damage caused by conflicts, coping strategies and chronic environmental problems (including climate change impacts) that undermine livelihoods must therefore be addressed from the outset. Minimizing vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change through the management of key natural resources and the introduction of appropriate technologies may also be addressed. Women and children are often disproportionally affected by environmental contamination economically, socially as well as in terms of their health and well-being. DDR practitioners should therefore seek to address the specific needs of women and children in relation to their dependence on natural resources and risks involved. Careful coordination and attention to issues of land access, tenure and the availability of agricultural inputs and access to financing are critical elements for ensuring success and sustainability. Women, and especially unmarried women and women who are not closely associated with a male relative, or those who face stigma or discrimination due to various other circumstances (i.e., sexual violence survivors, single mothers, unmarried women, etc.) are often disadvantaged in regard to access to capital assets as women\u2019s ownership rights are often based on de facto agreements through male community members and traditional gender roles may prevent women and girls from accessing education and capacity building. \n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states. Such actions should aim to use an inclusive approach that seeks to consider and respond to the needs of the entire population, especially women and youth. Bringing communities together to discuss and resolve common challenges and concerns, such as access to water points and grazing lands, can be a powerful peacebuilding tool and can help to mitigate the risk of further conflict between competing natural resource user groups.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -212340,14 +212340,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states.", + "Sentence": "\n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states.", "newParagraph": "outset several key risk factor consider looking leverage natural resource support ddr process depending ddr practitioner working along peace continuum following three key area risk opportunity considered n supporting economic recovery natural resource properly governed carefully managed highvalue resource hydrocarbon mineral metal stone export timber form important basis employment creation budget revenue development close attention whether robust framework place respect land right subsurface natural resource right precursor engagement private sector entity help facilitate type opportunity whether highvalue natural resource agricultural commodity significant market value coffee cocoa grain soft commodity risk however pressure kickstart development earn foreign exchange lead rapid uncontrolled exploitation resource suboptimal price without due attention land subsurface resource right environmental sustainability employment creation equitable distribution revenue benefit shared environmental degradation occurs consequence exploitation could serious potential conflict resume n developing sustainable livelihood peace sustainable peace fundamentally hinge development sustainable livelihood provision basic service recovery sound management including equitable distribution related benefit natural resource base environmental damage caused conflict coping strategy chronic environmental problem including climate change impact undermine livelihood must therefore addressed outset minimizing vulnerability natural hazard climate change management key natural resource introduction appropriate technology may also addressed woman child often disproportionally affected environmental contamination economically socially well term health wellbeing ddr practitioner therefore seek address specific need woman child relation dependence natural resource risk involved careful coordination attention issue land access tenure availability agricultural input access financing critical element ensuring success sustainability woman especially unmarried woman woman closely associated male relative face stigma discrimination due various circumstance ie sexual violence survivor single mother unmarried woman etc often disadvantaged regard access capital asset woman ownership right often based de facto agreement male community member traditional gender role may prevent woman girl accessing education capacity building n contributing dialogue reconciliation confidence building natural resource neutral entry point catalyst enhancing dialogue building confidence exploring shared interest broadening cooperation divided community well within state action aim use inclusive approach seek consider respond need entire population especially woman youth bringing community together discus resolve common challenge concern access water point grazing land powerful peacebuilding tool help mitigate risk conflict competing natural resource user group", "ProcessedSent": "n contributing dialogue reconciliation confidence building natural resource neutral entry point catalyst enhancing dialogue building confidence exploring shared interest broadening cooperation divided community well within state", "SentID": 11796 }, { "ParagraphID": 3262, - "Paragraph": "At the outset, there are several key risk factors to consider when looking to leverage natural resources to support DDR processes. Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \\n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development. With close attention to whether a robust framework is in place with respect to land rights, and sub-surface natural resource rights as a pre-cursor, engagement with private sector entities can help to facilitate these types of opportunities, whether for high-value natural resources or agricultural commodities with significant market value such as coffee, cocoa, grains or other soft commodities. The risk, however, is that the pressure to kick-start development and earn foreign exchange can lead to rapid, uncontrolled exploitation of such resources at sub-optimal prices, without due attention to land and sub-surface resource rights, environmental sustainability, employment creation and the equitable distribution of revenues. When the benefits are not shared, or when environmental degradation occurs as a consequence of exploitation, there could be serious potential for conflict to resume. \\n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base. Environmental damage caused by conflicts, coping strategies and chronic environmental problems (including climate change impacts) that undermine livelihoods must therefore be addressed from the outset. Minimizing vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change through the management of key natural resources and the introduction of appropriate technologies may also be addressed. Women and children are often disproportionally affected by environmental contamination economically, socially as well as in terms of their health and well-being. DDR practitioners should therefore seek to address the specific needs of women and children in relation to their dependence on natural resources and risks involved. Careful coordination and attention to issues of land access, tenure and the availability of agricultural inputs and access to financing are critical elements for ensuring success and sustainability. Women, and especially unmarried women and women who are not closely associated with a male relative, or those who face stigma or discrimination due to various other circumstances (i.e., sexual violence survivors, single mothers, unmarried women, etc.) are often disadvantaged in regard to access to capital assets as women\u2019s ownership rights are often based on de facto agreements through male community members and traditional gender roles may prevent women and girls from accessing education and capacity building. \\n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states. Such actions should aim to use an inclusive approach that seeks to consider and respond to the needs of the entire population, especially women and youth. Bringing communities together to discuss and resolve common challenges and concerns, such as access to water points and grazing lands, can be a powerful peacebuilding tool and can help to mitigate the risk of further conflict between competing natural resource user groups.", + "Paragraph": "At the outset, there are several key risk factors to consider when looking to leverage natural resources to support DDR processes. Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development. With close attention to whether a robust framework is in place with respect to land rights, and sub-surface natural resource rights as a pre-cursor, engagement with private sector entities can help to facilitate these types of opportunities, whether for high-value natural resources or agricultural commodities with significant market value such as coffee, cocoa, grains or other soft commodities. The risk, however, is that the pressure to kick-start development and earn foreign exchange can lead to rapid, uncontrolled exploitation of such resources at sub-optimal prices, without due attention to land and sub-surface resource rights, environmental sustainability, employment creation and the equitable distribution of revenues. When the benefits are not shared, or when environmental degradation occurs as a consequence of exploitation, there could be serious potential for conflict to resume. \n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base. Environmental damage caused by conflicts, coping strategies and chronic environmental problems (including climate change impacts) that undermine livelihoods must therefore be addressed from the outset. Minimizing vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change through the management of key natural resources and the introduction of appropriate technologies may also be addressed. Women and children are often disproportionally affected by environmental contamination economically, socially as well as in terms of their health and well-being. DDR practitioners should therefore seek to address the specific needs of women and children in relation to their dependence on natural resources and risks involved. Careful coordination and attention to issues of land access, tenure and the availability of agricultural inputs and access to financing are critical elements for ensuring success and sustainability. Women, and especially unmarried women and women who are not closely associated with a male relative, or those who face stigma or discrimination due to various other circumstances (i.e., sexual violence survivors, single mothers, unmarried women, etc.) are often disadvantaged in regard to access to capital assets as women\u2019s ownership rights are often based on de facto agreements through male community members and traditional gender roles may prevent women and girls from accessing education and capacity building. \n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states. Such actions should aim to use an inclusive approach that seeks to consider and respond to the needs of the entire population, especially women and youth. Bringing communities together to discuss and resolve common challenges and concerns, such as access to water points and grazing lands, can be a powerful peacebuilding tool and can help to mitigate the risk of further conflict between competing natural resource user groups.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -212365,7 +212365,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3262, - "Paragraph": "At the outset, there are several key risk factors to consider when looking to leverage natural resources to support DDR processes. Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \\n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development. With close attention to whether a robust framework is in place with respect to land rights, and sub-surface natural resource rights as a pre-cursor, engagement with private sector entities can help to facilitate these types of opportunities, whether for high-value natural resources or agricultural commodities with significant market value such as coffee, cocoa, grains or other soft commodities. The risk, however, is that the pressure to kick-start development and earn foreign exchange can lead to rapid, uncontrolled exploitation of such resources at sub-optimal prices, without due attention to land and sub-surface resource rights, environmental sustainability, employment creation and the equitable distribution of revenues. When the benefits are not shared, or when environmental degradation occurs as a consequence of exploitation, there could be serious potential for conflict to resume. \\n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base. Environmental damage caused by conflicts, coping strategies and chronic environmental problems (including climate change impacts) that undermine livelihoods must therefore be addressed from the outset. Minimizing vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change through the management of key natural resources and the introduction of appropriate technologies may also be addressed. Women and children are often disproportionally affected by environmental contamination economically, socially as well as in terms of their health and well-being. DDR practitioners should therefore seek to address the specific needs of women and children in relation to their dependence on natural resources and risks involved. Careful coordination and attention to issues of land access, tenure and the availability of agricultural inputs and access to financing are critical elements for ensuring success and sustainability. Women, and especially unmarried women and women who are not closely associated with a male relative, or those who face stigma or discrimination due to various other circumstances (i.e., sexual violence survivors, single mothers, unmarried women, etc.) are often disadvantaged in regard to access to capital assets as women\u2019s ownership rights are often based on de facto agreements through male community members and traditional gender roles may prevent women and girls from accessing education and capacity building. \\n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states. Such actions should aim to use an inclusive approach that seeks to consider and respond to the needs of the entire population, especially women and youth. Bringing communities together to discuss and resolve common challenges and concerns, such as access to water points and grazing lands, can be a powerful peacebuilding tool and can help to mitigate the risk of further conflict between competing natural resource user groups.", + "Paragraph": "At the outset, there are several key risk factors to consider when looking to leverage natural resources to support DDR processes. Depending on where DDR practitioners are working along the peace continuum, the following are three key areas where risks and opportunities should be considered: \n Supporting economic recovery: When natural resources are properly governed and carefully managed, \u201chigh-value\u201d resources (such as hydrocarbons, minerals, metals, stones and export timber) can form an important basis for employment creation and budget revenue for development. With close attention to whether a robust framework is in place with respect to land rights, and sub-surface natural resource rights as a pre-cursor, engagement with private sector entities can help to facilitate these types of opportunities, whether for high-value natural resources or agricultural commodities with significant market value such as coffee, cocoa, grains or other soft commodities. The risk, however, is that the pressure to kick-start development and earn foreign exchange can lead to rapid, uncontrolled exploitation of such resources at sub-optimal prices, without due attention to land and sub-surface resource rights, environmental sustainability, employment creation and the equitable distribution of revenues. When the benefits are not shared, or when environmental degradation occurs as a consequence of exploitation, there could be serious potential for conflict to resume. \n Developing sustainable livelihoods for peace: Sustainable peace fundamentally hinges on the development of sustainable livelihoods, the provision of basic services, and on the recovery and sound management (including equitable distribution of related benefits) of the natural resource base. Environmental damage caused by conflicts, coping strategies and chronic environmental problems (including climate change impacts) that undermine livelihoods must therefore be addressed from the outset. Minimizing vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change through the management of key natural resources and the introduction of appropriate technologies may also be addressed. Women and children are often disproportionally affected by environmental contamination economically, socially as well as in terms of their health and well-being. DDR practitioners should therefore seek to address the specific needs of women and children in relation to their dependence on natural resources and risks involved. Careful coordination and attention to issues of land access, tenure and the availability of agricultural inputs and access to financing are critical elements for ensuring success and sustainability. Women, and especially unmarried women and women who are not closely associated with a male relative, or those who face stigma or discrimination due to various other circumstances (i.e., sexual violence survivors, single mothers, unmarried women, etc.) are often disadvantaged in regard to access to capital assets as women\u2019s ownership rights are often based on de facto agreements through male community members and traditional gender roles may prevent women and girls from accessing education and capacity building. \n Contributing to dialogue, reconciliation and confidence building: Natural resources can be a neutral entry point or catalyst for enhancing dialogue, building confidence, exploring shared interests and broadening cooperation between divided communities as well as within and between states. Such actions should aim to use an inclusive approach that seeks to consider and respond to the needs of the entire population, especially women and youth. Bringing communities together to discuss and resolve common challenges and concerns, such as access to water points and grazing lands, can be a powerful peacebuilding tool and can help to mitigate the risk of further conflict between competing natural resource user groups.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -212689,7 +212689,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3267, - "Paragraph": "In order to determine if natural resources have played (or continue to play) a critical role in armed conflict, assessments should seek to understand the key actors in the conflict and their linkages to natural resources (see Table 1). Assessments should also identify: \\n Key financial and strategic benefits and drawbacks of the identified resources on all warring parties and civilian populations affected by the conflict. \\n The nature and extent of grievances over the identified natural resources (real and perceived), if any. \\n The location of implicated resources and overlap with territories under the control of armed forces and groups. \\n The role of sanctions in deterring illegal exploitation of natural resources. \\n The extent and type of resource depletion and environmental damage caused as a result of mismanagement of natural resources during the conflict. \\n Displacement of local populations and their potential loss of access to natural resources. \\n Cross-border activities regarding natural resources. \\n Linkages to organized criminal groups (see IDDRS 6.40 on DDR and Organized Crime). \\n Linkages to armed groups designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 6.50 on DDR and Armed Groups Designated as Terrorist Organizations) \\n Analyses of different actors in the conflict and their relationship with natural resources.", + "Paragraph": "In order to determine if natural resources have played (or continue to play) a critical role in armed conflict, assessments should seek to understand the key actors in the conflict and their linkages to natural resources (see Table 1). Assessments should also identify: \n Key financial and strategic benefits and drawbacks of the identified resources on all warring parties and civilian populations affected by the conflict. \n The nature and extent of grievances over the identified natural resources (real and perceived), if any. \n The location of implicated resources and overlap with territories under the control of armed forces and groups. \n The role of sanctions in deterring illegal exploitation of natural resources. \n The extent and type of resource depletion and environmental damage caused as a result of mismanagement of natural resources during the conflict. \n Displacement of local populations and their potential loss of access to natural resources. \n Cross-border activities regarding natural resources. \n Linkages to organized criminal groups (see IDDRS 6.40 on DDR and Organized Crime). \n Linkages to armed groups designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 6.50 on DDR and Armed Groups Designated as Terrorist Organizations) \n Analyses of different actors in the conflict and their relationship with natural resources.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -212707,7 +212707,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3267, - "Paragraph": "In order to determine if natural resources have played (or continue to play) a critical role in armed conflict, assessments should seek to understand the key actors in the conflict and their linkages to natural resources (see Table 1). Assessments should also identify: \\n Key financial and strategic benefits and drawbacks of the identified resources on all warring parties and civilian populations affected by the conflict. \\n The nature and extent of grievances over the identified natural resources (real and perceived), if any. \\n The location of implicated resources and overlap with territories under the control of armed forces and groups. \\n The role of sanctions in deterring illegal exploitation of natural resources. \\n The extent and type of resource depletion and environmental damage caused as a result of mismanagement of natural resources during the conflict. \\n Displacement of local populations and their potential loss of access to natural resources. \\n Cross-border activities regarding natural resources. \\n Linkages to organized criminal groups (see IDDRS 6.40 on DDR and Organized Crime). \\n Linkages to armed groups designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 6.50 on DDR and Armed Groups Designated as Terrorist Organizations) \\n Analyses of different actors in the conflict and their relationship with natural resources.", + "Paragraph": "In order to determine if natural resources have played (or continue to play) a critical role in armed conflict, assessments should seek to understand the key actors in the conflict and their linkages to natural resources (see Table 1). Assessments should also identify: \n Key financial and strategic benefits and drawbacks of the identified resources on all warring parties and civilian populations affected by the conflict. \n The nature and extent of grievances over the identified natural resources (real and perceived), if any. \n The location of implicated resources and overlap with territories under the control of armed forces and groups. \n The role of sanctions in deterring illegal exploitation of natural resources. \n The extent and type of resource depletion and environmental damage caused as a result of mismanagement of natural resources during the conflict. \n Displacement of local populations and their potential loss of access to natural resources. \n Cross-border activities regarding natural resources. \n Linkages to organized criminal groups (see IDDRS 6.40 on DDR and Organized Crime). \n Linkages to armed groups designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 6.50 on DDR and Armed Groups Designated as Terrorist Organizations) \n Analyses of different actors in the conflict and their relationship with natural resources.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -212718,14 +212718,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "6.1.1 Natural resources and conflict linkages", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Assessments should also identify: \\n Key financial and strategic benefits and drawbacks of the identified resources on all warring parties and civilian populations affected by the conflict.", + "Sentence": "Assessments should also identify: \n Key financial and strategic benefits and drawbacks of the identified resources on all warring parties and civilian populations affected by the conflict.", "newParagraph": "order determine natural resource played continue play critical role armed conflict assessment seek understand key actor conflict linkage natural resource see table 1 assessment also identify n key financial strategic benefit drawback identified resource warring party civilian population affected conflict n nature extent grievance identified natural resource real perceived n location implicated resource overlap territory control armed force group n role sanction deterring illegal exploitation natural resource n extent type resource depletion environmental damage caused result mismanagement natural resource conflict n displacement local population potential loss access natural resource n crossborder activity regarding natural resource n linkage organized criminal group see iddrs 640 ddr organized crime n linkage armed group designated terrorist organization see iddrs 650 ddr armed group designated terrorist organization n analysis different actor conflict relationship natural resource", "ProcessedSent": "assessment also identify n key financial strategic benefit drawback identified resource warring party civilian population affected conflict", "SentID": 11817 }, { "ParagraphID": 3267, - "Paragraph": "In order to determine if natural resources have played (or continue to play) a critical role in armed conflict, assessments should seek to understand the key actors in the conflict and their linkages to natural resources (see Table 1). Assessments should also identify: \\n Key financial and strategic benefits and drawbacks of the identified resources on all warring parties and civilian populations affected by the conflict. \\n The nature and extent of grievances over the identified natural resources (real and perceived), if any. \\n The location of implicated resources and overlap with territories under the control of armed forces and groups. \\n The role of sanctions in deterring illegal exploitation of natural resources. \\n The extent and type of resource depletion and environmental damage caused as a result of mismanagement of natural resources during the conflict. \\n Displacement of local populations and their potential loss of access to natural resources. \\n Cross-border activities regarding natural resources. \\n Linkages to organized criminal groups (see IDDRS 6.40 on DDR and Organized Crime). \\n Linkages to armed groups designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 6.50 on DDR and Armed Groups Designated as Terrorist Organizations) \\n Analyses of different actors in the conflict and their relationship with natural resources.", + "Paragraph": "In order to determine if natural resources have played (or continue to play) a critical role in armed conflict, assessments should seek to understand the key actors in the conflict and their linkages to natural resources (see Table 1). Assessments should also identify: \n Key financial and strategic benefits and drawbacks of the identified resources on all warring parties and civilian populations affected by the conflict. \n The nature and extent of grievances over the identified natural resources (real and perceived), if any. \n The location of implicated resources and overlap with territories under the control of armed forces and groups. \n The role of sanctions in deterring illegal exploitation of natural resources. \n The extent and type of resource depletion and environmental damage caused as a result of mismanagement of natural resources during the conflict. \n Displacement of local populations and their potential loss of access to natural resources. \n Cross-border activities regarding natural resources. \n Linkages to organized criminal groups (see IDDRS 6.40 on DDR and Organized Crime). \n Linkages to armed groups designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 6.50 on DDR and Armed Groups Designated as Terrorist Organizations) \n Analyses of different actors in the conflict and their relationship with natural resources.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -212736,14 +212736,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "6.1.1 Natural resources and conflict linkages", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The nature and extent of grievances over the identified natural resources (real and perceived), if any.", + "Sentence": "\n The nature and extent of grievances over the identified natural resources (real and perceived), if any.", "newParagraph": "order determine natural resource played continue play critical role armed conflict assessment seek understand key actor conflict linkage natural resource see table 1 assessment also identify n key financial strategic benefit drawback identified resource warring party civilian population affected conflict n nature extent grievance identified natural resource real perceived n location implicated resource overlap territory control armed force group n role sanction deterring illegal exploitation natural resource n extent type resource depletion environmental damage caused result mismanagement natural resource conflict n displacement local population potential loss access natural resource n crossborder activity regarding natural resource n linkage organized criminal group see iddrs 640 ddr organized crime n linkage armed group designated terrorist organization see iddrs 650 ddr armed group designated terrorist organization n analysis different actor conflict relationship natural resource", "ProcessedSent": "n nature extent grievance identified natural resource real perceived", "SentID": 11818 }, { "ParagraphID": 3267, - "Paragraph": "In order to determine if natural resources have played (or continue to play) a critical role in armed conflict, assessments should seek to understand the key actors in the conflict and their linkages to natural resources (see Table 1). Assessments should also identify: \\n Key financial and strategic benefits and drawbacks of the identified resources on all warring parties and civilian populations affected by the conflict. \\n The nature and extent of grievances over the identified natural resources (real and perceived), if any. \\n The location of implicated resources and overlap with territories under the control of armed forces and groups. \\n The role of sanctions in deterring illegal exploitation of natural resources. \\n The extent and type of resource depletion and environmental damage caused as a result of mismanagement of natural resources during the conflict. \\n Displacement of local populations and their potential loss of access to natural resources. \\n Cross-border activities regarding natural resources. \\n Linkages to organized criminal groups (see IDDRS 6.40 on DDR and Organized Crime). \\n Linkages to armed groups designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 6.50 on DDR and Armed Groups Designated as Terrorist Organizations) \\n Analyses of different actors in the conflict and their relationship with natural resources.", + "Paragraph": "In order to determine if natural resources have played (or continue to play) a critical role in armed conflict, assessments should seek to understand the key actors in the conflict and their linkages to natural resources (see Table 1). Assessments should also identify: \n Key financial and strategic benefits and drawbacks of the identified resources on all warring parties and civilian populations affected by the conflict. \n The nature and extent of grievances over the identified natural resources (real and perceived), if any. \n The location of implicated resources and overlap with territories under the control of armed forces and groups. \n The role of sanctions in deterring illegal exploitation of natural resources. \n The extent and type of resource depletion and environmental damage caused as a result of mismanagement of natural resources during the conflict. \n Displacement of local populations and their potential loss of access to natural resources. \n Cross-border activities regarding natural resources. \n Linkages to organized criminal groups (see IDDRS 6.40 on DDR and Organized Crime). \n Linkages to armed groups designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 6.50 on DDR and Armed Groups Designated as Terrorist Organizations) \n Analyses of different actors in the conflict and their relationship with natural resources.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -212754,14 +212754,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "6.1.1 Natural resources and conflict linkages", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The location of implicated resources and overlap with territories under the control of armed forces and groups.", + "Sentence": "\n The location of implicated resources and overlap with territories under the control of armed forces and groups.", "newParagraph": "order determine natural resource played continue play critical role armed conflict assessment seek understand key actor conflict linkage natural resource see table 1 assessment also identify n key financial strategic benefit drawback identified resource warring party civilian population affected conflict n nature extent grievance identified natural resource real perceived n location implicated resource overlap territory control armed force group n role sanction deterring illegal exploitation natural resource n extent type resource depletion environmental damage caused result mismanagement natural resource conflict n displacement local population potential loss access natural resource n crossborder activity regarding natural resource n linkage organized criminal group see iddrs 640 ddr organized crime n linkage armed group designated terrorist organization see iddrs 650 ddr armed group designated terrorist organization n analysis different actor conflict relationship natural resource", "ProcessedSent": "n location implicated resource overlap territory control armed force group", "SentID": 11819 }, { "ParagraphID": 3267, - "Paragraph": "In order to determine if natural resources have played (or continue to play) a critical role in armed conflict, assessments should seek to understand the key actors in the conflict and their linkages to natural resources (see Table 1). Assessments should also identify: \\n Key financial and strategic benefits and drawbacks of the identified resources on all warring parties and civilian populations affected by the conflict. \\n The nature and extent of grievances over the identified natural resources (real and perceived), if any. \\n The location of implicated resources and overlap with territories under the control of armed forces and groups. \\n The role of sanctions in deterring illegal exploitation of natural resources. \\n The extent and type of resource depletion and environmental damage caused as a result of mismanagement of natural resources during the conflict. \\n Displacement of local populations and their potential loss of access to natural resources. \\n Cross-border activities regarding natural resources. \\n Linkages to organized criminal groups (see IDDRS 6.40 on DDR and Organized Crime). \\n Linkages to armed groups designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 6.50 on DDR and Armed Groups Designated as Terrorist Organizations) \\n Analyses of different actors in the conflict and their relationship with natural resources.", + "Paragraph": "In order to determine if natural resources have played (or continue to play) a critical role in armed conflict, assessments should seek to understand the key actors in the conflict and their linkages to natural resources (see Table 1). Assessments should also identify: \n Key financial and strategic benefits and drawbacks of the identified resources on all warring parties and civilian populations affected by the conflict. \n The nature and extent of grievances over the identified natural resources (real and perceived), if any. \n The location of implicated resources and overlap with territories under the control of armed forces and groups. \n The role of sanctions in deterring illegal exploitation of natural resources. \n The extent and type of resource depletion and environmental damage caused as a result of mismanagement of natural resources during the conflict. \n Displacement of local populations and their potential loss of access to natural resources. \n Cross-border activities regarding natural resources. \n Linkages to organized criminal groups (see IDDRS 6.40 on DDR and Organized Crime). \n Linkages to armed groups designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 6.50 on DDR and Armed Groups Designated as Terrorist Organizations) \n Analyses of different actors in the conflict and their relationship with natural resources.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -212772,14 +212772,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "6.1.1 Natural resources and conflict linkages", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The role of sanctions in deterring illegal exploitation of natural resources.", + "Sentence": "\n The role of sanctions in deterring illegal exploitation of natural resources.", "newParagraph": "order determine natural resource played continue play critical role armed conflict assessment seek understand key actor conflict linkage natural resource see table 1 assessment also identify n key financial strategic benefit drawback identified resource warring party civilian population affected conflict n nature extent grievance identified natural resource real perceived n location implicated resource overlap territory control armed force group n role sanction deterring illegal exploitation natural resource n extent type resource depletion environmental damage caused result mismanagement natural resource conflict n displacement local population potential loss access natural resource n crossborder activity regarding natural resource n linkage organized criminal group see iddrs 640 ddr organized crime n linkage armed group designated terrorist organization see iddrs 650 ddr armed group designated terrorist organization n analysis different actor conflict relationship natural resource", "ProcessedSent": "n role sanction deterring illegal exploitation natural resource", "SentID": 11820 }, { "ParagraphID": 3267, - "Paragraph": "In order to determine if natural resources have played (or continue to play) a critical role in armed conflict, assessments should seek to understand the key actors in the conflict and their linkages to natural resources (see Table 1). Assessments should also identify: \\n Key financial and strategic benefits and drawbacks of the identified resources on all warring parties and civilian populations affected by the conflict. \\n The nature and extent of grievances over the identified natural resources (real and perceived), if any. \\n The location of implicated resources and overlap with territories under the control of armed forces and groups. \\n The role of sanctions in deterring illegal exploitation of natural resources. \\n The extent and type of resource depletion and environmental damage caused as a result of mismanagement of natural resources during the conflict. \\n Displacement of local populations and their potential loss of access to natural resources. \\n Cross-border activities regarding natural resources. \\n Linkages to organized criminal groups (see IDDRS 6.40 on DDR and Organized Crime). \\n Linkages to armed groups designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 6.50 on DDR and Armed Groups Designated as Terrorist Organizations) \\n Analyses of different actors in the conflict and their relationship with natural resources.", + "Paragraph": "In order to determine if natural resources have played (or continue to play) a critical role in armed conflict, assessments should seek to understand the key actors in the conflict and their linkages to natural resources (see Table 1). Assessments should also identify: \n Key financial and strategic benefits and drawbacks of the identified resources on all warring parties and civilian populations affected by the conflict. \n The nature and extent of grievances over the identified natural resources (real and perceived), if any. \n The location of implicated resources and overlap with territories under the control of armed forces and groups. \n The role of sanctions in deterring illegal exploitation of natural resources. \n The extent and type of resource depletion and environmental damage caused as a result of mismanagement of natural resources during the conflict. \n Displacement of local populations and their potential loss of access to natural resources. \n Cross-border activities regarding natural resources. \n Linkages to organized criminal groups (see IDDRS 6.40 on DDR and Organized Crime). \n Linkages to armed groups designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 6.50 on DDR and Armed Groups Designated as Terrorist Organizations) \n Analyses of different actors in the conflict and their relationship with natural resources.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -212790,14 +212790,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "6.1.1 Natural resources and conflict linkages", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n The extent and type of resource depletion and environmental damage caused as a result of mismanagement of natural resources during the conflict.", + "Sentence": "\n The extent and type of resource depletion and environmental damage caused as a result of mismanagement of natural resources during the conflict.", "newParagraph": "order determine natural resource played continue play critical role armed conflict assessment seek understand key actor conflict linkage natural resource see table 1 assessment also identify n key financial strategic benefit drawback identified resource warring party civilian population affected conflict n nature extent grievance identified natural resource real perceived n location implicated resource overlap territory control armed force group n role sanction deterring illegal exploitation natural resource n extent type resource depletion environmental damage caused result mismanagement natural resource conflict n displacement local population potential loss access natural resource n crossborder activity regarding natural resource n linkage organized criminal group see iddrs 640 ddr organized crime n linkage armed group designated terrorist organization see iddrs 650 ddr armed group designated terrorist organization n analysis different actor conflict relationship natural resource", "ProcessedSent": "n extent type resource depletion environmental damage caused result mismanagement natural resource conflict", "SentID": 11821 }, { "ParagraphID": 3267, - "Paragraph": "In order to determine if natural resources have played (or continue to play) a critical role in armed conflict, assessments should seek to understand the key actors in the conflict and their linkages to natural resources (see Table 1). Assessments should also identify: \\n Key financial and strategic benefits and drawbacks of the identified resources on all warring parties and civilian populations affected by the conflict. \\n The nature and extent of grievances over the identified natural resources (real and perceived), if any. \\n The location of implicated resources and overlap with territories under the control of armed forces and groups. \\n The role of sanctions in deterring illegal exploitation of natural resources. \\n The extent and type of resource depletion and environmental damage caused as a result of mismanagement of natural resources during the conflict. \\n Displacement of local populations and their potential loss of access to natural resources. \\n Cross-border activities regarding natural resources. \\n Linkages to organized criminal groups (see IDDRS 6.40 on DDR and Organized Crime). \\n Linkages to armed groups designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 6.50 on DDR and Armed Groups Designated as Terrorist Organizations) \\n Analyses of different actors in the conflict and their relationship with natural resources.", + "Paragraph": "In order to determine if natural resources have played (or continue to play) a critical role in armed conflict, assessments should seek to understand the key actors in the conflict and their linkages to natural resources (see Table 1). Assessments should also identify: \n Key financial and strategic benefits and drawbacks of the identified resources on all warring parties and civilian populations affected by the conflict. \n The nature and extent of grievances over the identified natural resources (real and perceived), if any. \n The location of implicated resources and overlap with territories under the control of armed forces and groups. \n The role of sanctions in deterring illegal exploitation of natural resources. \n The extent and type of resource depletion and environmental damage caused as a result of mismanagement of natural resources during the conflict. \n Displacement of local populations and their potential loss of access to natural resources. \n Cross-border activities regarding natural resources. \n Linkages to organized criminal groups (see IDDRS 6.40 on DDR and Organized Crime). \n Linkages to armed groups designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 6.50 on DDR and Armed Groups Designated as Terrorist Organizations) \n Analyses of different actors in the conflict and their relationship with natural resources.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -212808,14 +212808,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "6.1.1 Natural resources and conflict linkages", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Displacement of local populations and their potential loss of access to natural resources.", + "Sentence": "\n Displacement of local populations and their potential loss of access to natural resources.", "newParagraph": "order determine natural resource played continue play critical role armed conflict assessment seek understand key actor conflict linkage natural resource see table 1 assessment also identify n key financial strategic benefit drawback identified resource warring party civilian population affected conflict n nature extent grievance identified natural resource real perceived n location implicated resource overlap territory control armed force group n role sanction deterring illegal exploitation natural resource n extent type resource depletion environmental damage caused result mismanagement natural resource conflict n displacement local population potential loss access natural resource n crossborder activity regarding natural resource n linkage organized criminal group see iddrs 640 ddr organized crime n linkage armed group designated terrorist organization see iddrs 650 ddr armed group designated terrorist organization n analysis different actor conflict relationship natural resource", "ProcessedSent": "n displacement local population potential loss access natural resource", "SentID": 11822 }, { "ParagraphID": 3267, - "Paragraph": "In order to determine if natural resources have played (or continue to play) a critical role in armed conflict, assessments should seek to understand the key actors in the conflict and their linkages to natural resources (see Table 1). Assessments should also identify: \\n Key financial and strategic benefits and drawbacks of the identified resources on all warring parties and civilian populations affected by the conflict. \\n The nature and extent of grievances over the identified natural resources (real and perceived), if any. \\n The location of implicated resources and overlap with territories under the control of armed forces and groups. \\n The role of sanctions in deterring illegal exploitation of natural resources. \\n The extent and type of resource depletion and environmental damage caused as a result of mismanagement of natural resources during the conflict. \\n Displacement of local populations and their potential loss of access to natural resources. \\n Cross-border activities regarding natural resources. \\n Linkages to organized criminal groups (see IDDRS 6.40 on DDR and Organized Crime). \\n Linkages to armed groups designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 6.50 on DDR and Armed Groups Designated as Terrorist Organizations) \\n Analyses of different actors in the conflict and their relationship with natural resources.", + "Paragraph": "In order to determine if natural resources have played (or continue to play) a critical role in armed conflict, assessments should seek to understand the key actors in the conflict and their linkages to natural resources (see Table 1). Assessments should also identify: \n Key financial and strategic benefits and drawbacks of the identified resources on all warring parties and civilian populations affected by the conflict. \n The nature and extent of grievances over the identified natural resources (real and perceived), if any. \n The location of implicated resources and overlap with territories under the control of armed forces and groups. \n The role of sanctions in deterring illegal exploitation of natural resources. \n The extent and type of resource depletion and environmental damage caused as a result of mismanagement of natural resources during the conflict. \n Displacement of local populations and their potential loss of access to natural resources. \n Cross-border activities regarding natural resources. \n Linkages to organized criminal groups (see IDDRS 6.40 on DDR and Organized Crime). \n Linkages to armed groups designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 6.50 on DDR and Armed Groups Designated as Terrorist Organizations) \n Analyses of different actors in the conflict and their relationship with natural resources.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -212826,14 +212826,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "6.1.1 Natural resources and conflict linkages", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Cross-border activities regarding natural resources.", + "Sentence": "\n Cross-border activities regarding natural resources.", "newParagraph": "order determine natural resource played continue play critical role armed conflict assessment seek understand key actor conflict linkage natural resource see table 1 assessment also identify n key financial strategic benefit drawback identified resource warring party civilian population affected conflict n nature extent grievance identified natural resource real perceived n location implicated resource overlap territory control armed force group n role sanction deterring illegal exploitation natural resource n extent type resource depletion environmental damage caused result mismanagement natural resource conflict n displacement local population potential loss access natural resource n crossborder activity regarding natural resource n linkage organized criminal group see iddrs 640 ddr organized crime n linkage armed group designated terrorist organization see iddrs 650 ddr armed group designated terrorist organization n analysis different actor conflict relationship natural resource", "ProcessedSent": "n crossborder activity regarding natural resource", "SentID": 11823 }, { "ParagraphID": 3267, - "Paragraph": "In order to determine if natural resources have played (or continue to play) a critical role in armed conflict, assessments should seek to understand the key actors in the conflict and their linkages to natural resources (see Table 1). Assessments should also identify: \\n Key financial and strategic benefits and drawbacks of the identified resources on all warring parties and civilian populations affected by the conflict. \\n The nature and extent of grievances over the identified natural resources (real and perceived), if any. \\n The location of implicated resources and overlap with territories under the control of armed forces and groups. \\n The role of sanctions in deterring illegal exploitation of natural resources. \\n The extent and type of resource depletion and environmental damage caused as a result of mismanagement of natural resources during the conflict. \\n Displacement of local populations and their potential loss of access to natural resources. \\n Cross-border activities regarding natural resources. \\n Linkages to organized criminal groups (see IDDRS 6.40 on DDR and Organized Crime). \\n Linkages to armed groups designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 6.50 on DDR and Armed Groups Designated as Terrorist Organizations) \\n Analyses of different actors in the conflict and their relationship with natural resources.", + "Paragraph": "In order to determine if natural resources have played (or continue to play) a critical role in armed conflict, assessments should seek to understand the key actors in the conflict and their linkages to natural resources (see Table 1). Assessments should also identify: \n Key financial and strategic benefits and drawbacks of the identified resources on all warring parties and civilian populations affected by the conflict. \n The nature and extent of grievances over the identified natural resources (real and perceived), if any. \n The location of implicated resources and overlap with territories under the control of armed forces and groups. \n The role of sanctions in deterring illegal exploitation of natural resources. \n The extent and type of resource depletion and environmental damage caused as a result of mismanagement of natural resources during the conflict. \n Displacement of local populations and their potential loss of access to natural resources. \n Cross-border activities regarding natural resources. \n Linkages to organized criminal groups (see IDDRS 6.40 on DDR and Organized Crime). \n Linkages to armed groups designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 6.50 on DDR and Armed Groups Designated as Terrorist Organizations) \n Analyses of different actors in the conflict and their relationship with natural resources.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -212844,14 +212844,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "6.1.1 Natural resources and conflict linkages", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Linkages to organized criminal groups (see IDDRS 6.40 on DDR and Organized Crime).", + "Sentence": "\n Linkages to organized criminal groups (see IDDRS 6.40 on DDR and Organized Crime).", "newParagraph": "order determine natural resource played continue play critical role armed conflict assessment seek understand key actor conflict linkage natural resource see table 1 assessment also identify n key financial strategic benefit drawback identified resource warring party civilian population affected conflict n nature extent grievance identified natural resource real perceived n location implicated resource overlap territory control armed force group n role sanction deterring illegal exploitation natural resource n extent type resource depletion environmental damage caused result mismanagement natural resource conflict n displacement local population potential loss access natural resource n crossborder activity regarding natural resource n linkage organized criminal group see iddrs 640 ddr organized crime n linkage armed group designated terrorist organization see iddrs 650 ddr armed group designated terrorist organization n analysis different actor conflict relationship natural resource", "ProcessedSent": "n linkage organized criminal group see iddrs 640 ddr organized crime", "SentID": 11824 }, { "ParagraphID": 3267, - "Paragraph": "In order to determine if natural resources have played (or continue to play) a critical role in armed conflict, assessments should seek to understand the key actors in the conflict and their linkages to natural resources (see Table 1). Assessments should also identify: \\n Key financial and strategic benefits and drawbacks of the identified resources on all warring parties and civilian populations affected by the conflict. \\n The nature and extent of grievances over the identified natural resources (real and perceived), if any. \\n The location of implicated resources and overlap with territories under the control of armed forces and groups. \\n The role of sanctions in deterring illegal exploitation of natural resources. \\n The extent and type of resource depletion and environmental damage caused as a result of mismanagement of natural resources during the conflict. \\n Displacement of local populations and their potential loss of access to natural resources. \\n Cross-border activities regarding natural resources. \\n Linkages to organized criminal groups (see IDDRS 6.40 on DDR and Organized Crime). \\n Linkages to armed groups designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 6.50 on DDR and Armed Groups Designated as Terrorist Organizations) \\n Analyses of different actors in the conflict and their relationship with natural resources.", + "Paragraph": "In order to determine if natural resources have played (or continue to play) a critical role in armed conflict, assessments should seek to understand the key actors in the conflict and their linkages to natural resources (see Table 1). Assessments should also identify: \n Key financial and strategic benefits and drawbacks of the identified resources on all warring parties and civilian populations affected by the conflict. \n The nature and extent of grievances over the identified natural resources (real and perceived), if any. \n The location of implicated resources and overlap with territories under the control of armed forces and groups. \n The role of sanctions in deterring illegal exploitation of natural resources. \n The extent and type of resource depletion and environmental damage caused as a result of mismanagement of natural resources during the conflict. \n Displacement of local populations and their potential loss of access to natural resources. \n Cross-border activities regarding natural resources. \n Linkages to organized criminal groups (see IDDRS 6.40 on DDR and Organized Crime). \n Linkages to armed groups designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 6.50 on DDR and Armed Groups Designated as Terrorist Organizations) \n Analyses of different actors in the conflict and their relationship with natural resources.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -212862,7 +212862,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "6.1.1 Natural resources and conflict linkages", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Linkages to armed groups designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 6.50 on DDR and Armed Groups Designated as Terrorist Organizations) \\n Analyses of different actors in the conflict and their relationship with natural resources.", + "Sentence": "\n Linkages to armed groups designated as terrorist organizations (see IDDRS 6.50 on DDR and Armed Groups Designated as Terrorist Organizations) \n Analyses of different actors in the conflict and their relationship with natural resources.", "newParagraph": "order determine natural resource played continue play critical role armed conflict assessment seek understand key actor conflict linkage natural resource see table 1 assessment also identify n key financial strategic benefit drawback identified resource warring party civilian population affected conflict n nature extent grievance identified natural resource real perceived n location implicated resource overlap territory control armed force group n role sanction deterring illegal exploitation natural resource n extent type resource depletion environmental damage caused result mismanagement natural resource conflict n displacement local population potential loss access natural resource n crossborder activity regarding natural resource n linkage organized criminal group see iddrs 640 ddr organized crime n linkage armed group designated terrorist organization see iddrs 650 ddr armed group designated terrorist organization n analysis different actor conflict relationship natural resource", "ProcessedSent": "n linkage armed group designated terrorist organization see iddrs 650 ddr armed group designated terrorist organization n analysis different actor conflict relationship natural resource", "SentID": 11825 @@ -212995,7 +212995,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3269, - "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \\n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \\n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \\n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \\n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \\n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \\n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \\n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \\n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \\n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \\n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \\n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \\n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \\n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \\n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \\n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \\n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", + "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213013,7 +213013,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3269, - "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \\n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \\n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \\n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \\n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \\n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \\n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \\n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \\n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \\n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \\n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \\n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \\n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \\n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \\n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \\n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \\n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", + "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213031,7 +213031,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3269, - "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \\n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \\n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \\n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \\n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \\n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \\n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \\n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \\n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \\n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \\n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \\n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \\n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \\n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \\n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \\n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \\n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", + "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213049,7 +213049,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3269, - "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \\n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \\n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \\n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \\n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \\n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \\n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \\n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \\n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \\n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \\n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \\n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \\n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \\n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \\n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \\n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \\n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", + "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213060,14 +213060,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "6.1.1 Natural resources and conflict linkages", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \\n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue?", + "Sentence": "Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue?", "newParagraph": "box 1 conflict security analysis natural resource conflict sample question force group particular woman youth peace agreement ceasefire signed grievance addressed conflict ended peace agreementbox 1 conflict security analysis natural resource conflict sample question n scarcity natural resource unequal distribution related benefit issue different social group able access natural resource differently n role land tenure land governance contributing conflict potentially conflict relapse ddr effort n role priority grievance woman men different age regard management natural resource n protection concern related natural resource conflict group risk men woman child minority group youth elder etc n grievance natural resource originally lead individual join recruited armed force group grievance person associated armed force group particular woman youth peace agreement ceasefire signed grievance addressed conflict ended peace agreement n political position one party conflict related access natural resource benefit derived n access natural resource supported chain command armed force group natural resource control allowed political social gain community state n main local global actor including private sector organized crime involved conflict relationship natural resource n armed force group maintained splintered supporting natural resource factor market accessing achieve n natural resource leveraged control civilian population n conflict stopped seriously impeded economic activity natural resource sector including agricultural production forestry fishery extractive industry issue parallel taxation smuggling militarization supply chain population affected n conflict involved landgrabbing appropriation land natural resource group specific need including woman youth person disability particularly affected n degradation exploitation natural resource conflict socially impacted affected population n conflict activity led degradation key natural resource example deforestation pollution erosion topsoil contamination depletion water source destruction sanitation facility infrastructure interruption energy supply n risk climate change natural disaster exacerbated way natural resource used conflict opportunity address risk ddr process n foreseeable specific effect ie risk opportunity natural resource management female excombatants woman formerly associated armed force group youth", "ProcessedSent": "conflict security analysis natural resource conflict sample question n scarcity natural resource unequal distribution related benefit issue", "SentID": 11836 }, { "ParagraphID": 3269, - "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \\n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \\n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \\n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \\n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \\n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \\n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \\n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \\n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \\n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \\n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \\n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \\n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \\n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \\n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \\n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \\n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", + "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213085,7 +213085,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3269, - "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \\n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \\n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \\n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \\n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \\n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \\n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \\n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \\n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \\n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \\n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \\n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \\n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \\n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \\n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \\n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \\n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", + "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213096,14 +213096,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "6.1.1 Natural resources and conflict linkages", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts?", + "Sentence": "\n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts?", "newParagraph": "box 1 conflict security analysis natural resource conflict sample question force group particular woman youth peace agreement ceasefire signed grievance addressed conflict ended peace agreementbox 1 conflict security analysis natural resource conflict sample question n scarcity natural resource unequal distribution related benefit issue different social group able access natural resource differently n role land tenure land governance contributing conflict potentially conflict relapse ddr effort n role priority grievance woman men different age regard management natural resource n protection concern related natural resource conflict group risk men woman child minority group youth elder etc n grievance natural resource originally lead individual join recruited armed force group grievance person associated armed force group particular woman youth peace agreement ceasefire signed grievance addressed conflict ended peace agreement n political position one party conflict related access natural resource benefit derived n access natural resource supported chain command armed force group natural resource control allowed political social gain community state n main local global actor including private sector organized crime involved conflict relationship natural resource n armed force group maintained splintered supporting natural resource factor market accessing achieve n natural resource leveraged control civilian population n conflict stopped seriously impeded economic activity natural resource sector including agricultural production forestry fishery extractive industry issue parallel taxation smuggling militarization supply chain population affected n conflict involved landgrabbing appropriation land natural resource group specific need including woman youth person disability particularly affected n degradation exploitation natural resource conflict socially impacted affected population n conflict activity led degradation key natural resource example deforestation pollution erosion topsoil contamination depletion water source destruction sanitation facility infrastructure interruption energy supply n risk climate change natural disaster exacerbated way natural resource used conflict opportunity address risk ddr process n foreseeable specific effect ie risk opportunity natural resource management female excombatants woman formerly associated armed force group youth", "ProcessedSent": "n role land tenure land governance contributing conflict potentially conflict relapse ddr effort", "SentID": 11838 }, { "ParagraphID": 3269, - "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \\n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \\n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \\n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \\n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \\n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \\n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \\n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \\n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \\n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \\n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \\n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \\n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \\n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \\n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \\n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \\n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", + "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213114,14 +213114,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "6.1.1 Natural resources and conflict linkages", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources?", + "Sentence": "\n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources?", "newParagraph": "box 1 conflict security analysis natural resource conflict sample question force group particular woman youth peace agreement ceasefire signed grievance addressed conflict ended peace agreementbox 1 conflict security analysis natural resource conflict sample question n scarcity natural resource unequal distribution related benefit issue different social group able access natural resource differently n role land tenure land governance contributing conflict potentially conflict relapse ddr effort n role priority grievance woman men different age regard management natural resource n protection concern related natural resource conflict group risk men woman child minority group youth elder etc n grievance natural resource originally lead individual join recruited armed force group grievance person associated armed force group particular woman youth peace agreement ceasefire signed grievance addressed conflict ended peace agreement n political position one party conflict related access natural resource benefit derived n access natural resource supported chain command armed force group natural resource control allowed political social gain community state n main local global actor including private sector organized crime involved conflict relationship natural resource n armed force group maintained splintered supporting natural resource factor market accessing achieve n natural resource leveraged control civilian population n conflict stopped seriously impeded economic activity natural resource sector including agricultural production forestry fishery extractive industry issue parallel taxation smuggling militarization supply chain population affected n conflict involved landgrabbing appropriation land natural resource group specific need including woman youth person disability particularly affected n degradation exploitation natural resource conflict socially impacted affected population n conflict activity led degradation key natural resource example deforestation pollution erosion topsoil contamination depletion water source destruction sanitation facility infrastructure interruption energy supply n risk climate change natural disaster exacerbated way natural resource used conflict opportunity address risk ddr process n foreseeable specific effect ie risk opportunity natural resource management female excombatants woman formerly associated armed force group youth", "ProcessedSent": "n role priority grievance woman men different age regard management natural resource", "SentID": 11839 }, { "ParagraphID": 3269, - "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \\n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \\n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \\n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \\n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \\n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \\n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \\n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \\n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \\n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \\n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \\n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \\n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \\n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \\n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \\n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \\n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", + "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213132,14 +213132,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "6.1.1 Natural resources and conflict linkages", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)?", + "Sentence": "\n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)?", "newParagraph": "box 1 conflict security analysis natural resource conflict sample question force group particular woman youth peace agreement ceasefire signed grievance addressed conflict ended peace agreementbox 1 conflict security analysis natural resource conflict sample question n scarcity natural resource unequal distribution related benefit issue different social group able access natural resource differently n role land tenure land governance contributing conflict potentially conflict relapse ddr effort n role priority grievance woman men different age regard management natural resource n protection concern related natural resource conflict group risk men woman child minority group youth elder etc n grievance natural resource originally lead individual join recruited armed force group grievance person associated armed force group particular woman youth peace agreement ceasefire signed grievance addressed conflict ended peace agreement n political position one party conflict related access natural resource benefit derived n access natural resource supported chain command armed force group natural resource control allowed political social gain community state n main local global actor including private sector organized crime involved conflict relationship natural resource n armed force group maintained splintered supporting natural resource factor market accessing achieve n natural resource leveraged control civilian population n conflict stopped seriously impeded economic activity natural resource sector including agricultural production forestry fishery extractive industry issue parallel taxation smuggling militarization supply chain population affected n conflict involved landgrabbing appropriation land natural resource group specific need including woman youth person disability particularly affected n degradation exploitation natural resource conflict socially impacted affected population n conflict activity led degradation key natural resource example deforestation pollution erosion topsoil contamination depletion water source destruction sanitation facility infrastructure interruption energy supply n risk climate change natural disaster exacerbated way natural resource used conflict opportunity address risk ddr process n foreseeable specific effect ie risk opportunity natural resource management female excombatants woman formerly associated armed force group youth", "ProcessedSent": "n protection concern related natural resource conflict group risk men woman child minority group youth elder etc", "SentID": 11840 }, { "ParagraphID": 3269, - "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \\n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \\n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \\n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \\n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \\n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \\n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \\n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \\n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \\n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \\n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \\n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \\n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \\n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \\n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \\n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \\n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", + "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213150,14 +213150,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "6.1.1 Natural resources and conflict linkages", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups?", + "Sentence": "\n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups?", "newParagraph": "box 1 conflict security analysis natural resource conflict sample question force group particular woman youth peace agreement ceasefire signed grievance addressed conflict ended peace agreementbox 1 conflict security analysis natural resource conflict sample question n scarcity natural resource unequal distribution related benefit issue different social group able access natural resource differently n role land tenure land governance contributing conflict potentially conflict relapse ddr effort n role priority grievance woman men different age regard management natural resource n protection concern related natural resource conflict group risk men woman child minority group youth elder etc n grievance natural resource originally lead individual join recruited armed force group grievance person associated armed force group particular woman youth peace agreement ceasefire signed grievance addressed conflict ended peace agreement n political position one party conflict related access natural resource benefit derived n access natural resource supported chain command armed force group natural resource control allowed political social gain community state n main local global actor including private sector organized crime involved conflict relationship natural resource n armed force group maintained splintered supporting natural resource factor market accessing achieve n natural resource leveraged control civilian population n conflict stopped seriously impeded economic activity natural resource sector including agricultural production forestry fishery extractive industry issue parallel taxation smuggling militarization supply chain population affected n conflict involved landgrabbing appropriation land natural resource group specific need including woman youth person disability particularly affected n degradation exploitation natural resource conflict socially impacted affected population n conflict activity led degradation key natural resource example deforestation pollution erosion topsoil contamination depletion water source destruction sanitation facility infrastructure interruption energy supply n risk climate change natural disaster exacerbated way natural resource used conflict opportunity address risk ddr process n foreseeable specific effect ie risk opportunity natural resource management female excombatants woman formerly associated armed force group youth", "ProcessedSent": "n grievance natural resource originally lead individual join recruited armed force group", "SentID": 11841 }, { "ParagraphID": 3269, - "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \\n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \\n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \\n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \\n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \\n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \\n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \\n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \\n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \\n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \\n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \\n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \\n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \\n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \\n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \\n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \\n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", + "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213175,7 +213175,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3269, - "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \\n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \\n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \\n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \\n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \\n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \\n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \\n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \\n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \\n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \\n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \\n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \\n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \\n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \\n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \\n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \\n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", + "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213193,7 +213193,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3269, - "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \\n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \\n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \\n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \\n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \\n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \\n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \\n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \\n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \\n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \\n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \\n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \\n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \\n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \\n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \\n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \\n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", + "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213204,14 +213204,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "6.1.1 Natural resources and conflict linkages", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them?", + "Sentence": "\n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them?", "newParagraph": "box 1 conflict security analysis natural resource conflict sample question force group particular woman youth peace agreement ceasefire signed grievance addressed conflict ended peace agreementbox 1 conflict security analysis natural resource conflict sample question n scarcity natural resource unequal distribution related benefit issue different social group able access natural resource differently n role land tenure land governance contributing conflict potentially conflict relapse ddr effort n role priority grievance woman men different age regard management natural resource n protection concern related natural resource conflict group risk men woman child minority group youth elder etc n grievance natural resource originally lead individual join recruited armed force group grievance person associated armed force group particular woman youth peace agreement ceasefire signed grievance addressed conflict ended peace agreement n political position one party conflict related access natural resource benefit derived n access natural resource supported chain command armed force group natural resource control allowed political social gain community state n main local global actor including private sector organized crime involved conflict relationship natural resource n armed force group maintained splintered supporting natural resource factor market accessing achieve n natural resource leveraged control civilian population n conflict stopped seriously impeded economic activity natural resource sector including agricultural production forestry fishery extractive industry issue parallel taxation smuggling militarization supply chain population affected n conflict involved landgrabbing appropriation land natural resource group specific need including woman youth person disability particularly affected n degradation exploitation natural resource conflict socially impacted affected population n conflict activity led degradation key natural resource example deforestation pollution erosion topsoil contamination depletion water source destruction sanitation facility infrastructure interruption energy supply n risk climate change natural disaster exacerbated way natural resource used conflict opportunity address risk ddr process n foreseeable specific effect ie risk opportunity natural resource management female excombatants woman formerly associated armed force group youth", "ProcessedSent": "n political position one party conflict related access natural resource benefit derived", "SentID": 11844 }, { "ParagraphID": 3269, - "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \\n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \\n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \\n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \\n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \\n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \\n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \\n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \\n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \\n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \\n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \\n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \\n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \\n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \\n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \\n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \\n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", + "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213222,14 +213222,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "6.1.1 Natural resources and conflict linkages", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups?", + "Sentence": "\n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups?", "newParagraph": "box 1 conflict security analysis natural resource conflict sample question force group particular woman youth peace agreement ceasefire signed grievance addressed conflict ended peace agreementbox 1 conflict security analysis natural resource conflict sample question n scarcity natural resource unequal distribution related benefit issue different social group able access natural resource differently n role land tenure land governance contributing conflict potentially conflict relapse ddr effort n role priority grievance woman men different age regard management natural resource n protection concern related natural resource conflict group risk men woman child minority group youth elder etc n grievance natural resource originally lead individual join recruited armed force group grievance person associated armed force group particular woman youth peace agreement ceasefire signed grievance addressed conflict ended peace agreement n political position one party conflict related access natural resource benefit derived n access natural resource supported chain command armed force group natural resource control allowed political social gain community state n main local global actor including private sector organized crime involved conflict relationship natural resource n armed force group maintained splintered supporting natural resource factor market accessing achieve n natural resource leveraged control civilian population n conflict stopped seriously impeded economic activity natural resource sector including agricultural production forestry fishery extractive industry issue parallel taxation smuggling militarization supply chain population affected n conflict involved landgrabbing appropriation land natural resource group specific need including woman youth person disability particularly affected n degradation exploitation natural resource conflict socially impacted affected population n conflict activity led degradation key natural resource example deforestation pollution erosion topsoil contamination depletion water source destruction sanitation facility infrastructure interruption energy supply n risk climate change natural disaster exacerbated way natural resource used conflict opportunity address risk ddr process n foreseeable specific effect ie risk opportunity natural resource management female excombatants woman formerly associated armed force group youth", "ProcessedSent": "n access natural resource supported chain command armed force group", "SentID": 11845 }, { "ParagraphID": 3269, - "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \\n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \\n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \\n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \\n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \\n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \\n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \\n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \\n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \\n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \\n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \\n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \\n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \\n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \\n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \\n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \\n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", + "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213247,7 +213247,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3269, - "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \\n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \\n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \\n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \\n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \\n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \\n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \\n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \\n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \\n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \\n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \\n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \\n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \\n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \\n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \\n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \\n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", + "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213258,14 +213258,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "6.1.1 Natural resources and conflict linkages", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources?", + "Sentence": "\n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources?", "newParagraph": "box 1 conflict security analysis natural resource conflict sample question force group particular woman youth peace agreement ceasefire signed grievance addressed conflict ended peace agreementbox 1 conflict security analysis natural resource conflict sample question n scarcity natural resource unequal distribution related benefit issue different social group able access natural resource differently n role land tenure land governance contributing conflict potentially conflict relapse ddr effort n role priority grievance woman men different age regard management natural resource n protection concern related natural resource conflict group risk men woman child minority group youth elder etc n grievance natural resource originally lead individual join recruited armed force group grievance person associated armed force group particular woman youth peace agreement ceasefire signed grievance addressed conflict ended peace agreement n political position one party conflict related access natural resource benefit derived n access natural resource supported chain command armed force group natural resource control allowed political social gain community state n main local global actor including private sector organized crime involved conflict relationship natural resource n armed force group maintained splintered supporting natural resource factor market accessing achieve n natural resource leveraged control civilian population n conflict stopped seriously impeded economic activity natural resource sector including agricultural production forestry fishery extractive industry issue parallel taxation smuggling militarization supply chain population affected n conflict involved landgrabbing appropriation land natural resource group specific need including woman youth person disability particularly affected n degradation exploitation natural resource conflict socially impacted affected population n conflict activity led degradation key natural resource example deforestation pollution erosion topsoil contamination depletion water source destruction sanitation facility infrastructure interruption energy supply n risk climate change natural disaster exacerbated way natural resource used conflict opportunity address risk ddr process n foreseeable specific effect ie risk opportunity natural resource management female excombatants woman formerly associated armed force group youth", "ProcessedSent": "n main local global actor including private sector organized crime involved conflict relationship natural resource", "SentID": 11847 }, { "ParagraphID": 3269, - "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \\n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \\n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \\n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \\n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \\n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \\n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \\n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \\n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \\n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \\n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \\n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \\n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \\n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \\n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \\n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \\n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", + "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213276,14 +213276,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "6.1.1 Natural resources and conflict linkages", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered?", + "Sentence": "\n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered?", "newParagraph": "box 1 conflict security analysis natural resource conflict sample question force group particular woman youth peace agreement ceasefire signed grievance addressed conflict ended peace agreementbox 1 conflict security analysis natural resource conflict sample question n scarcity natural resource unequal distribution related benefit issue different social group able access natural resource differently n role land tenure land governance contributing conflict potentially conflict relapse ddr effort n role priority grievance woman men different age regard management natural resource n protection concern related natural resource conflict group risk men woman child minority group youth elder etc n grievance natural resource originally lead individual join recruited armed force group grievance person associated armed force group particular woman youth peace agreement ceasefire signed grievance addressed conflict ended peace agreement n political position one party conflict related access natural resource benefit derived n access natural resource supported chain command armed force group natural resource control allowed political social gain community state n main local global actor including private sector organized crime involved conflict relationship natural resource n armed force group maintained splintered supporting natural resource factor market accessing achieve n natural resource leveraged control civilian population n conflict stopped seriously impeded economic activity natural resource sector including agricultural production forestry fishery extractive industry issue parallel taxation smuggling militarization supply chain population affected n conflict involved landgrabbing appropriation land natural resource group specific need including woman youth person disability particularly affected n degradation exploitation natural resource conflict socially impacted affected population n conflict activity led degradation key natural resource example deforestation pollution erosion topsoil contamination depletion water source destruction sanitation facility infrastructure interruption energy supply n risk climate change natural disaster exacerbated way natural resource used conflict opportunity address risk ddr process n foreseeable specific effect ie risk opportunity natural resource management female excombatants woman formerly associated armed force group youth", "ProcessedSent": "n armed force group maintained splintered", "SentID": 11848 }, { "ParagraphID": 3269, - "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \\n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \\n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \\n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \\n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \\n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \\n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \\n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \\n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \\n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \\n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \\n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \\n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \\n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \\n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \\n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \\n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", + "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213301,7 +213301,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3269, - "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \\n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \\n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \\n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \\n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \\n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \\n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \\n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \\n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \\n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \\n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \\n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \\n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \\n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \\n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \\n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \\n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", + "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213319,7 +213319,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3269, - "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \\n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \\n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \\n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \\n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \\n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \\n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \\n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \\n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \\n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \\n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \\n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \\n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \\n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \\n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \\n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \\n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", + "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213330,14 +213330,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "6.1.1 Natural resources and conflict linkages", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population?", + "Sentence": "\n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population?", "newParagraph": "box 1 conflict security analysis natural resource conflict sample question force group particular woman youth peace agreement ceasefire signed grievance addressed conflict ended peace agreementbox 1 conflict security analysis natural resource conflict sample question n scarcity natural resource unequal distribution related benefit issue different social group able access natural resource differently n role land tenure land governance contributing conflict potentially conflict relapse ddr effort n role priority grievance woman men different age regard management natural resource n protection concern related natural resource conflict group risk men woman child minority group youth elder etc n grievance natural resource originally lead individual join recruited armed force group grievance person associated armed force group particular woman youth peace agreement ceasefire signed grievance addressed conflict ended peace agreement n political position one party conflict related access natural resource benefit derived n access natural resource supported chain command armed force group natural resource control allowed political social gain community state n main local global actor including private sector organized crime involved conflict relationship natural resource n armed force group maintained splintered supporting natural resource factor market accessing achieve n natural resource leveraged control civilian population n conflict stopped seriously impeded economic activity natural resource sector including agricultural production forestry fishery extractive industry issue parallel taxation smuggling militarization supply chain population affected n conflict involved landgrabbing appropriation land natural resource group specific need including woman youth person disability particularly affected n degradation exploitation natural resource conflict socially impacted affected population n conflict activity led degradation key natural resource example deforestation pollution erosion topsoil contamination depletion water source destruction sanitation facility infrastructure interruption energy supply n risk climate change natural disaster exacerbated way natural resource used conflict opportunity address risk ddr process n foreseeable specific effect ie risk opportunity natural resource management female excombatants woman formerly associated armed force group youth", "ProcessedSent": "n natural resource leveraged control civilian population", "SentID": 11851 }, { "ParagraphID": 3269, - "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \\n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \\n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \\n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \\n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \\n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \\n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \\n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \\n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \\n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \\n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \\n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \\n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \\n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \\n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \\n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \\n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", + "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213348,14 +213348,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "6.1.1 Natural resources and conflict linkages", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries?", + "Sentence": "\n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries?", "newParagraph": "box 1 conflict security analysis natural resource conflict sample question force group particular woman youth peace agreement ceasefire signed grievance addressed conflict ended peace agreementbox 1 conflict security analysis natural resource conflict sample question n scarcity natural resource unequal distribution related benefit issue different social group able access natural resource differently n role land tenure land governance contributing conflict potentially conflict relapse ddr effort n role priority grievance woman men different age regard management natural resource n protection concern related natural resource conflict group risk men woman child minority group youth elder etc n grievance natural resource originally lead individual join recruited armed force group grievance person associated armed force group particular woman youth peace agreement ceasefire signed grievance addressed conflict ended peace agreement n political position one party conflict related access natural resource benefit derived n access natural resource supported chain command armed force group natural resource control allowed political social gain community state n main local global actor including private sector organized crime involved conflict relationship natural resource n armed force group maintained splintered supporting natural resource factor market accessing achieve n natural resource leveraged control civilian population n conflict stopped seriously impeded economic activity natural resource sector including agricultural production forestry fishery extractive industry issue parallel taxation smuggling militarization supply chain population affected n conflict involved landgrabbing appropriation land natural resource group specific need including woman youth person disability particularly affected n degradation exploitation natural resource conflict socially impacted affected population n conflict activity led degradation key natural resource example deforestation pollution erosion topsoil contamination depletion water source destruction sanitation facility infrastructure interruption energy supply n risk climate change natural disaster exacerbated way natural resource used conflict opportunity address risk ddr process n foreseeable specific effect ie risk opportunity natural resource management female excombatants woman formerly associated armed force group youth", "ProcessedSent": "n conflict stopped seriously impeded economic activity natural resource sector including agricultural production forestry fishery extractive industry", "SentID": 11852 }, { "ParagraphID": 3269, - "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \\n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \\n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \\n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \\n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \\n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \\n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \\n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \\n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \\n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \\n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \\n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \\n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \\n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \\n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \\n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \\n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", + "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213373,7 +213373,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3269, - "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \\n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \\n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \\n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \\n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \\n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \\n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \\n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \\n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \\n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \\n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \\n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \\n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \\n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \\n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \\n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \\n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", + "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213391,7 +213391,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3269, - "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \\n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \\n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \\n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \\n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \\n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \\n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \\n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \\n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \\n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \\n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \\n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \\n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \\n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \\n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \\n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \\n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", + "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213402,14 +213402,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "6.1.1 Natural resources and conflict linkages", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources?", + "Sentence": "\n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources?", "newParagraph": "box 1 conflict security analysis natural resource conflict sample question force group particular woman youth peace agreement ceasefire signed grievance addressed conflict ended peace agreementbox 1 conflict security analysis natural resource conflict sample question n scarcity natural resource unequal distribution related benefit issue different social group able access natural resource differently n role land tenure land governance contributing conflict potentially conflict relapse ddr effort n role priority grievance woman men different age regard management natural resource n protection concern related natural resource conflict group risk men woman child minority group youth elder etc n grievance natural resource originally lead individual join recruited armed force group grievance person associated armed force group particular woman youth peace agreement ceasefire signed grievance addressed conflict ended peace agreement n political position one party conflict related access natural resource benefit derived n access natural resource supported chain command armed force group natural resource control allowed political social gain community state n main local global actor including private sector organized crime involved conflict relationship natural resource n armed force group maintained splintered supporting natural resource factor market accessing achieve n natural resource leveraged control civilian population n conflict stopped seriously impeded economic activity natural resource sector including agricultural production forestry fishery extractive industry issue parallel taxation smuggling militarization supply chain population affected n conflict involved landgrabbing appropriation land natural resource group specific need including woman youth person disability particularly affected n degradation exploitation natural resource conflict socially impacted affected population n conflict activity led degradation key natural resource example deforestation pollution erosion topsoil contamination depletion water source destruction sanitation facility infrastructure interruption energy supply n risk climate change natural disaster exacerbated way natural resource used conflict opportunity address risk ddr process n foreseeable specific effect ie risk opportunity natural resource management female excombatants woman formerly associated armed force group youth", "ProcessedSent": "n conflict involved landgrabbing appropriation land natural resource", "SentID": 11855 }, { "ParagraphID": 3269, - "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \\n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \\n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \\n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \\n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \\n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \\n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \\n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \\n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \\n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \\n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \\n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \\n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \\n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \\n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \\n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \\n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", + "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213427,7 +213427,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3269, - "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \\n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \\n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \\n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \\n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \\n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \\n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \\n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \\n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \\n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \\n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \\n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \\n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \\n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \\n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \\n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \\n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", + "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213438,14 +213438,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "6.1.1 Natural resources and conflict linkages", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations?", + "Sentence": "\n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations?", "newParagraph": "box 1 conflict security analysis natural resource conflict sample question force group particular woman youth peace agreement ceasefire signed grievance addressed conflict ended peace agreementbox 1 conflict security analysis natural resource conflict sample question n scarcity natural resource unequal distribution related benefit issue different social group able access natural resource differently n role land tenure land governance contributing conflict potentially conflict relapse ddr effort n role priority grievance woman men different age regard management natural resource n protection concern related natural resource conflict group risk men woman child minority group youth elder etc n grievance natural resource originally lead individual join recruited armed force group grievance person associated armed force group particular woman youth peace agreement ceasefire signed grievance addressed conflict ended peace agreement n political position one party conflict related access natural resource benefit derived n access natural resource supported chain command armed force group natural resource control allowed political social gain community state n main local global actor including private sector organized crime involved conflict relationship natural resource n armed force group maintained splintered supporting natural resource factor market accessing achieve n natural resource leveraged control civilian population n conflict stopped seriously impeded economic activity natural resource sector including agricultural production forestry fishery extractive industry issue parallel taxation smuggling militarization supply chain population affected n conflict involved landgrabbing appropriation land natural resource group specific need including woman youth person disability particularly affected n degradation exploitation natural resource conflict socially impacted affected population n conflict activity led degradation key natural resource example deforestation pollution erosion topsoil contamination depletion water source destruction sanitation facility infrastructure interruption energy supply n risk climate change natural disaster exacerbated way natural resource used conflict opportunity address risk ddr process n foreseeable specific effect ie risk opportunity natural resource management female excombatants woman formerly associated armed force group youth", "ProcessedSent": "n degradation exploitation natural resource conflict socially impacted affected population", "SentID": 11857 }, { "ParagraphID": 3269, - "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \\n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \\n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \\n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \\n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \\n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \\n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \\n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \\n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \\n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \\n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \\n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \\n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \\n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \\n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \\n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \\n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", + "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213456,14 +213456,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "6.1.1 Natural resources and conflict linkages", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies?", + "Sentence": "\n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies?", "newParagraph": "box 1 conflict security analysis natural resource conflict sample question force group particular woman youth peace agreement ceasefire signed grievance addressed conflict ended peace agreementbox 1 conflict security analysis natural resource conflict sample question n scarcity natural resource unequal distribution related benefit issue different social group able access natural resource differently n role land tenure land governance contributing conflict potentially conflict relapse ddr effort n role priority grievance woman men different age regard management natural resource n protection concern related natural resource conflict group risk men woman child minority group youth elder etc n grievance natural resource originally lead individual join recruited armed force group grievance person associated armed force group particular woman youth peace agreement ceasefire signed grievance addressed conflict ended peace agreement n political position one party conflict related access natural resource benefit derived n access natural resource supported chain command armed force group natural resource control allowed political social gain community state n main local global actor including private sector organized crime involved conflict relationship natural resource n armed force group maintained splintered supporting natural resource factor market accessing achieve n natural resource leveraged control civilian population n conflict stopped seriously impeded economic activity natural resource sector including agricultural production forestry fishery extractive industry issue parallel taxation smuggling militarization supply chain population affected n conflict involved landgrabbing appropriation land natural resource group specific need including woman youth person disability particularly affected n degradation exploitation natural resource conflict socially impacted affected population n conflict activity led degradation key natural resource example deforestation pollution erosion topsoil contamination depletion water source destruction sanitation facility infrastructure interruption energy supply n risk climate change natural disaster exacerbated way natural resource used conflict opportunity address risk ddr process n foreseeable specific effect ie risk opportunity natural resource management female excombatants woman formerly associated armed force group youth", "ProcessedSent": "n conflict activity led degradation key natural resource example deforestation pollution erosion topsoil contamination depletion water source destruction sanitation facility infrastructure interruption energy supply", "SentID": 11858 }, { "ParagraphID": 3269, - "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \\n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \\n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \\n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \\n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \\n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \\n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \\n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \\n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \\n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \\n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \\n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \\n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \\n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \\n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \\n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \\n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", + "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213474,14 +213474,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "6.1.1 Natural resources and conflict linkages", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict?", + "Sentence": "\n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict?", "newParagraph": "box 1 conflict security analysis natural resource conflict sample question force group particular woman youth peace agreement ceasefire signed grievance addressed conflict ended peace agreementbox 1 conflict security analysis natural resource conflict sample question n scarcity natural resource unequal distribution related benefit issue different social group able access natural resource differently n role land tenure land governance contributing conflict potentially conflict relapse ddr effort n role priority grievance woman men different age regard management natural resource n protection concern related natural resource conflict group risk men woman child minority group youth elder etc n grievance natural resource originally lead individual join recruited armed force group grievance person associated armed force group particular woman youth peace agreement ceasefire signed grievance addressed conflict ended peace agreement n political position one party conflict related access natural resource benefit derived n access natural resource supported chain command armed force group natural resource control allowed political social gain community state n main local global actor including private sector organized crime involved conflict relationship natural resource n armed force group maintained splintered supporting natural resource factor market accessing achieve n natural resource leveraged control civilian population n conflict stopped seriously impeded economic activity natural resource sector including agricultural production forestry fishery extractive industry issue parallel taxation smuggling militarization supply chain population affected n conflict involved landgrabbing appropriation land natural resource group specific need including woman youth person disability particularly affected n degradation exploitation natural resource conflict socially impacted affected population n conflict activity led degradation key natural resource example deforestation pollution erosion topsoil contamination depletion water source destruction sanitation facility infrastructure interruption energy supply n risk climate change natural disaster exacerbated way natural resource used conflict opportunity address risk ddr process n foreseeable specific effect ie risk opportunity natural resource management female excombatants woman formerly associated armed force group youth", "ProcessedSent": "n risk climate change natural disaster exacerbated way natural resource used conflict", "SentID": 11859 }, { "ParagraphID": 3269, - "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \\n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \\n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \\n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \\n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \\n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \\n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \\n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \\n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \\n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \\n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \\n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \\n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \\n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \\n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \\n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \\n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", + "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213499,7 +213499,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3269, - "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \\n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \\n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \\n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \\n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \\n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \\n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \\n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \\n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \\n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \\n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \\n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \\n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \\n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \\n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \\n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \\n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", + "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213510,14 +213510,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "6.1.1 Natural resources and conflict linkages", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups?", + "Sentence": "\n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups?", "newParagraph": "box 1 conflict security analysis natural resource conflict sample question force group particular woman youth peace agreement ceasefire signed grievance addressed conflict ended peace agreementbox 1 conflict security analysis natural resource conflict sample question n scarcity natural resource unequal distribution related benefit issue different social group able access natural resource differently n role land tenure land governance contributing conflict potentially conflict relapse ddr effort n role priority grievance woman men different age regard management natural resource n protection concern related natural resource conflict group risk men woman child minority group youth elder etc n grievance natural resource originally lead individual join recruited armed force group grievance person associated armed force group particular woman youth peace agreement ceasefire signed grievance addressed conflict ended peace agreement n political position one party conflict related access natural resource benefit derived n access natural resource supported chain command armed force group natural resource control allowed political social gain community state n main local global actor including private sector organized crime involved conflict relationship natural resource n armed force group maintained splintered supporting natural resource factor market accessing achieve n natural resource leveraged control civilian population n conflict stopped seriously impeded economic activity natural resource sector including agricultural production forestry fishery extractive industry issue parallel taxation smuggling militarization supply chain population affected n conflict involved landgrabbing appropriation land natural resource group specific need including woman youth person disability particularly affected n degradation exploitation natural resource conflict socially impacted affected population n conflict activity led degradation key natural resource example deforestation pollution erosion topsoil contamination depletion water source destruction sanitation facility infrastructure interruption energy supply n risk climate change natural disaster exacerbated way natural resource used conflict opportunity address risk ddr process n foreseeable specific effect ie risk opportunity natural resource management female excombatants woman formerly associated armed force group youth", "ProcessedSent": "n foreseeable specific effect ie risk opportunity natural resource management female excombatants woman formerly associated armed force group", "SentID": 11861 }, { "ParagraphID": 3269, - "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \\n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \\n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \\n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \\n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \\n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \\n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \\n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \\n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \\n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \\n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \\n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \\n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \\n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \\n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \\n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \\n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", + "Paragraph": "Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement?Box 1. Conflict and security analysis for natural resources and conflict: sample questions \n Is scarcity of natural resources or unequal distribution of related benefits an issue? How are different social groups able to access natural resources differently? \n What is the role of land tenure and land governance in contributing to conflict - and potentially to conflict relapse - during DDR efforts? \n What are the roles, priorities and grievances of women and men of different ages in regard to management of natural resources? \n What are the protection concerns related to natural resources and conflict and which groups are most at risk (men, women, children, minority groups, youth, elders, etc.)? \n Did grievances over natural resources originally lead individuals to join \u2013 or to be recruited into \u2013 armed forces or groups? What about the grievances of persons associated with armed forces or groups, in particular women and youth? If a peace agreement or ceasefire has been signed, were these grievances addressed when the conflict ended or in the peace agreement? \n Is the political position of one or more of the parties to the conflict related to access to natural resources or to the benefits derived from them? \n Has access to natural resources supported the chain of command in armed forces or groups? How has natural resource control allowed for political or social gain over communities and the State? \n Who are the main local and global actors (including private sector and organized crime) involved in the conflict and what is their relationship to natural resources? \n Have armed forces and groups maintained or splintered? How are they supporting themselves? Do natural resources factor in and what markets are they accessing to achieve this? \n How have natural resources been leveraged to control the civilian population? \n Has the conflict stopped or seriously impeded economic activities in natural resource sectors, including agricultural production, forestry, fisheries, or extractive industries? Are there issues with parallel taxation, smuggling, or militarization of supply chains? What populations have been most affected by this? \n Has the conflict involved land-grabbing or other appropriation of land and natural resources? Have groups with specific needs, including women, youth and persons with disabilities, been particularly affected? \n How has the degradation or exploitation of natural resources during conflict socially impacted affected populations? \n Have conflict activities led to the degradation of key natural resources, for example through deforestation, pollution or erosion of topsoil, contamination or depletion of water sources, destruction of sanitation facilities and infrastructure, or interruption of energy supplies? \n Are risks of climate change or natural disasters exacerbated by the ways that natural resources are being used before, during or after the conflict? Are there opportunities to address these risks through DDR processes? \n Are there foreseeable, specific effects (i.e., risks and opportunities) of natural resource management on female ex-combatants and women formerly associated with armed forces and groups? And for youth?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213859,7 +213859,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3274, - "Paragraph": "Box 2. Sample questions for the profiling of male and female members of armed forces and groups: \\n - Motivations for joining armed forces and groups linked to natural resources? \\n - Potential areas of return and likely livelihoods options to identify potential natural resource sectors to support? Seasonality of these occupations and related migration patterns? Are there communal natural resources in question in the area of return? Will DDR participants have access to these? \\n - The use of natural resources by the members of armed forces and groups to identify potential hot spots? \\n - Possibility to employ job\/vocational skills in natural resource management? \\n - Economic activities already undertaken prior to joining or while with armed forces and groups in different natural resource sectors? \\n - Interest to undertake economic activities in natural resource sectors?", + "Paragraph": "Box 2. Sample questions for the profiling of male and female members of armed forces and groups: \n - Motivations for joining armed forces and groups linked to natural resources? \n - Potential areas of return and likely livelihoods options to identify potential natural resource sectors to support? Seasonality of these occupations and related migration patterns? Are there communal natural resources in question in the area of return? Will DDR participants have access to these? \n - The use of natural resources by the members of armed forces and groups to identify potential hot spots? \n - Possibility to employ job\/vocational skills in natural resource management? \n - Economic activities already undertaken prior to joining or while with armed forces and groups in different natural resource sectors? \n - Interest to undertake economic activities in natural resource sectors?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213877,7 +213877,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3274, - "Paragraph": "Box 2. Sample questions for the profiling of male and female members of armed forces and groups: \\n - Motivations for joining armed forces and groups linked to natural resources? \\n - Potential areas of return and likely livelihoods options to identify potential natural resource sectors to support? Seasonality of these occupations and related migration patterns? Are there communal natural resources in question in the area of return? Will DDR participants have access to these? \\n - The use of natural resources by the members of armed forces and groups to identify potential hot spots? \\n - Possibility to employ job\/vocational skills in natural resource management? \\n - Economic activities already undertaken prior to joining or while with armed forces and groups in different natural resource sectors? \\n - Interest to undertake economic activities in natural resource sectors?", + "Paragraph": "Box 2. Sample questions for the profiling of male and female members of armed forces and groups: \n - Motivations for joining armed forces and groups linked to natural resources? \n - Potential areas of return and likely livelihoods options to identify potential natural resource sectors to support? Seasonality of these occupations and related migration patterns? Are there communal natural resources in question in the area of return? Will DDR participants have access to these? \n - The use of natural resources by the members of armed forces and groups to identify potential hot spots? \n - Possibility to employ job\/vocational skills in natural resource management? \n - Economic activities already undertaken prior to joining or while with armed forces and groups in different natural resource sectors? \n - Interest to undertake economic activities in natural resource sectors?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213888,14 +213888,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "6.1.2 Employment and livelihood opportunities", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Sample questions for the profiling of male and female members of armed forces and groups: \\n - Motivations for joining armed forces and groups linked to natural resources?", + "Sentence": "Sample questions for the profiling of male and female members of armed forces and groups: \n - Motivations for joining armed forces and groups linked to natural resources?", "newParagraph": "box 2 sample question profiling male female member armed force group n motivation joining armed force group linked natural resource n potential area return likely livelihood option identify potential natural resource sector support seasonality occupation related migration pattern communal natural resource question area return ddr participant access n use natural resource member armed force group identify potential hot spot n possibility employ jobvocational skill natural resource management n economic activity already undertaken prior joining armed force group different natural resource sector n interest undertake economic activity natural resource sector", "ProcessedSent": "sample question profiling male female member armed force group n motivation joining armed force group linked natural resource", "SentID": 11882 }, { "ParagraphID": 3274, - "Paragraph": "Box 2. Sample questions for the profiling of male and female members of armed forces and groups: \\n - Motivations for joining armed forces and groups linked to natural resources? \\n - Potential areas of return and likely livelihoods options to identify potential natural resource sectors to support? Seasonality of these occupations and related migration patterns? Are there communal natural resources in question in the area of return? Will DDR participants have access to these? \\n - The use of natural resources by the members of armed forces and groups to identify potential hot spots? \\n - Possibility to employ job\/vocational skills in natural resource management? \\n - Economic activities already undertaken prior to joining or while with armed forces and groups in different natural resource sectors? \\n - Interest to undertake economic activities in natural resource sectors?", + "Paragraph": "Box 2. Sample questions for the profiling of male and female members of armed forces and groups: \n - Motivations for joining armed forces and groups linked to natural resources? \n - Potential areas of return and likely livelihoods options to identify potential natural resource sectors to support? Seasonality of these occupations and related migration patterns? Are there communal natural resources in question in the area of return? Will DDR participants have access to these? \n - The use of natural resources by the members of armed forces and groups to identify potential hot spots? \n - Possibility to employ job\/vocational skills in natural resource management? \n - Economic activities already undertaken prior to joining or while with armed forces and groups in different natural resource sectors? \n - Interest to undertake economic activities in natural resource sectors?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213906,14 +213906,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "6.1.2 Employment and livelihood opportunities", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n - Potential areas of return and likely livelihoods options to identify potential natural resource sectors to support?", + "Sentence": "\n - Potential areas of return and likely livelihoods options to identify potential natural resource sectors to support?", "newParagraph": "box 2 sample question profiling male female member armed force group n motivation joining armed force group linked natural resource n potential area return likely livelihood option identify potential natural resource sector support seasonality occupation related migration pattern communal natural resource question area return ddr participant access n use natural resource member armed force group identify potential hot spot n possibility employ jobvocational skill natural resource management n economic activity already undertaken prior joining armed force group different natural resource sector n interest undertake economic activity natural resource sector", "ProcessedSent": "n potential area return likely livelihood option identify potential natural resource sector support", "SentID": 11883 }, { "ParagraphID": 3274, - "Paragraph": "Box 2. Sample questions for the profiling of male and female members of armed forces and groups: \\n - Motivations for joining armed forces and groups linked to natural resources? \\n - Potential areas of return and likely livelihoods options to identify potential natural resource sectors to support? Seasonality of these occupations and related migration patterns? Are there communal natural resources in question in the area of return? Will DDR participants have access to these? \\n - The use of natural resources by the members of armed forces and groups to identify potential hot spots? \\n - Possibility to employ job\/vocational skills in natural resource management? \\n - Economic activities already undertaken prior to joining or while with armed forces and groups in different natural resource sectors? \\n - Interest to undertake economic activities in natural resource sectors?", + "Paragraph": "Box 2. Sample questions for the profiling of male and female members of armed forces and groups: \n - Motivations for joining armed forces and groups linked to natural resources? \n - Potential areas of return and likely livelihoods options to identify potential natural resource sectors to support? Seasonality of these occupations and related migration patterns? Are there communal natural resources in question in the area of return? Will DDR participants have access to these? \n - The use of natural resources by the members of armed forces and groups to identify potential hot spots? \n - Possibility to employ job\/vocational skills in natural resource management? \n - Economic activities already undertaken prior to joining or while with armed forces and groups in different natural resource sectors? \n - Interest to undertake economic activities in natural resource sectors?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213931,7 +213931,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3274, - "Paragraph": "Box 2. Sample questions for the profiling of male and female members of armed forces and groups: \\n - Motivations for joining armed forces and groups linked to natural resources? \\n - Potential areas of return and likely livelihoods options to identify potential natural resource sectors to support? Seasonality of these occupations and related migration patterns? Are there communal natural resources in question in the area of return? Will DDR participants have access to these? \\n - The use of natural resources by the members of armed forces and groups to identify potential hot spots? \\n - Possibility to employ job\/vocational skills in natural resource management? \\n - Economic activities already undertaken prior to joining or while with armed forces and groups in different natural resource sectors? \\n - Interest to undertake economic activities in natural resource sectors?", + "Paragraph": "Box 2. Sample questions for the profiling of male and female members of armed forces and groups: \n - Motivations for joining armed forces and groups linked to natural resources? \n - Potential areas of return and likely livelihoods options to identify potential natural resource sectors to support? Seasonality of these occupations and related migration patterns? Are there communal natural resources in question in the area of return? Will DDR participants have access to these? \n - The use of natural resources by the members of armed forces and groups to identify potential hot spots? \n - Possibility to employ job\/vocational skills in natural resource management? \n - Economic activities already undertaken prior to joining or while with armed forces and groups in different natural resource sectors? \n - Interest to undertake economic activities in natural resource sectors?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213949,7 +213949,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3274, - "Paragraph": "Box 2. Sample questions for the profiling of male and female members of armed forces and groups: \\n - Motivations for joining armed forces and groups linked to natural resources? \\n - Potential areas of return and likely livelihoods options to identify potential natural resource sectors to support? Seasonality of these occupations and related migration patterns? Are there communal natural resources in question in the area of return? Will DDR participants have access to these? \\n - The use of natural resources by the members of armed forces and groups to identify potential hot spots? \\n - Possibility to employ job\/vocational skills in natural resource management? \\n - Economic activities already undertaken prior to joining or while with armed forces and groups in different natural resource sectors? \\n - Interest to undertake economic activities in natural resource sectors?", + "Paragraph": "Box 2. Sample questions for the profiling of male and female members of armed forces and groups: \n - Motivations for joining armed forces and groups linked to natural resources? \n - Potential areas of return and likely livelihoods options to identify potential natural resource sectors to support? Seasonality of these occupations and related migration patterns? Are there communal natural resources in question in the area of return? Will DDR participants have access to these? \n - The use of natural resources by the members of armed forces and groups to identify potential hot spots? \n - Possibility to employ job\/vocational skills in natural resource management? \n - Economic activities already undertaken prior to joining or while with armed forces and groups in different natural resource sectors? \n - Interest to undertake economic activities in natural resource sectors?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213967,7 +213967,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3274, - "Paragraph": "Box 2. Sample questions for the profiling of male and female members of armed forces and groups: \\n - Motivations for joining armed forces and groups linked to natural resources? \\n - Potential areas of return and likely livelihoods options to identify potential natural resource sectors to support? Seasonality of these occupations and related migration patterns? Are there communal natural resources in question in the area of return? Will DDR participants have access to these? \\n - The use of natural resources by the members of armed forces and groups to identify potential hot spots? \\n - Possibility to employ job\/vocational skills in natural resource management? \\n - Economic activities already undertaken prior to joining or while with armed forces and groups in different natural resource sectors? \\n - Interest to undertake economic activities in natural resource sectors?", + "Paragraph": "Box 2. Sample questions for the profiling of male and female members of armed forces and groups: \n - Motivations for joining armed forces and groups linked to natural resources? \n - Potential areas of return and likely livelihoods options to identify potential natural resource sectors to support? Seasonality of these occupations and related migration patterns? Are there communal natural resources in question in the area of return? Will DDR participants have access to these? \n - The use of natural resources by the members of armed forces and groups to identify potential hot spots? \n - Possibility to employ job\/vocational skills in natural resource management? \n - Economic activities already undertaken prior to joining or while with armed forces and groups in different natural resource sectors? \n - Interest to undertake economic activities in natural resource sectors?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213978,14 +213978,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "6.1.2 Employment and livelihood opportunities", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n - The use of natural resources by the members of armed forces and groups to identify potential hot spots?", + "Sentence": "\n - The use of natural resources by the members of armed forces and groups to identify potential hot spots?", "newParagraph": "box 2 sample question profiling male female member armed force group n motivation joining armed force group linked natural resource n potential area return likely livelihood option identify potential natural resource sector support seasonality occupation related migration pattern communal natural resource question area return ddr participant access n use natural resource member armed force group identify potential hot spot n possibility employ jobvocational skill natural resource management n economic activity already undertaken prior joining armed force group different natural resource sector n interest undertake economic activity natural resource sector", "ProcessedSent": "n use natural resource member armed force group identify potential hot spot", "SentID": 11887 }, { "ParagraphID": 3274, - "Paragraph": "Box 2. Sample questions for the profiling of male and female members of armed forces and groups: \\n - Motivations for joining armed forces and groups linked to natural resources? \\n - Potential areas of return and likely livelihoods options to identify potential natural resource sectors to support? Seasonality of these occupations and related migration patterns? Are there communal natural resources in question in the area of return? Will DDR participants have access to these? \\n - The use of natural resources by the members of armed forces and groups to identify potential hot spots? \\n - Possibility to employ job\/vocational skills in natural resource management? \\n - Economic activities already undertaken prior to joining or while with armed forces and groups in different natural resource sectors? \\n - Interest to undertake economic activities in natural resource sectors?", + "Paragraph": "Box 2. Sample questions for the profiling of male and female members of armed forces and groups: \n - Motivations for joining armed forces and groups linked to natural resources? \n - Potential areas of return and likely livelihoods options to identify potential natural resource sectors to support? Seasonality of these occupations and related migration patterns? Are there communal natural resources in question in the area of return? Will DDR participants have access to these? \n - The use of natural resources by the members of armed forces and groups to identify potential hot spots? \n - Possibility to employ job\/vocational skills in natural resource management? \n - Economic activities already undertaken prior to joining or while with armed forces and groups in different natural resource sectors? \n - Interest to undertake economic activities in natural resource sectors?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -213996,14 +213996,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "6.1.2 Employment and livelihood opportunities", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n - Possibility to employ job\/vocational skills in natural resource management?", + "Sentence": "\n - Possibility to employ job\/vocational skills in natural resource management?", "newParagraph": "box 2 sample question profiling male female member armed force group n motivation joining armed force group linked natural resource n potential area return likely livelihood option identify potential natural resource sector support seasonality occupation related migration pattern communal natural resource question area return ddr participant access n use natural resource member armed force group identify potential hot spot n possibility employ jobvocational skill natural resource management n economic activity already undertaken prior joining armed force group different natural resource sector n interest undertake economic activity natural resource sector", "ProcessedSent": "n possibility employ jobvocational skill natural resource management", "SentID": 11888 }, { "ParagraphID": 3274, - "Paragraph": "Box 2. Sample questions for the profiling of male and female members of armed forces and groups: \\n - Motivations for joining armed forces and groups linked to natural resources? \\n - Potential areas of return and likely livelihoods options to identify potential natural resource sectors to support? Seasonality of these occupations and related migration patterns? Are there communal natural resources in question in the area of return? Will DDR participants have access to these? \\n - The use of natural resources by the members of armed forces and groups to identify potential hot spots? \\n - Possibility to employ job\/vocational skills in natural resource management? \\n - Economic activities already undertaken prior to joining or while with armed forces and groups in different natural resource sectors? \\n - Interest to undertake economic activities in natural resource sectors?", + "Paragraph": "Box 2. Sample questions for the profiling of male and female members of armed forces and groups: \n - Motivations for joining armed forces and groups linked to natural resources? \n - Potential areas of return and likely livelihoods options to identify potential natural resource sectors to support? Seasonality of these occupations and related migration patterns? Are there communal natural resources in question in the area of return? Will DDR participants have access to these? \n - The use of natural resources by the members of armed forces and groups to identify potential hot spots? \n - Possibility to employ job\/vocational skills in natural resource management? \n - Economic activities already undertaken prior to joining or while with armed forces and groups in different natural resource sectors? \n - Interest to undertake economic activities in natural resource sectors?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -214014,14 +214014,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "6.1.2 Employment and livelihood opportunities", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n - Economic activities already undertaken prior to joining or while with armed forces and groups in different natural resource sectors?", + "Sentence": "\n - Economic activities already undertaken prior to joining or while with armed forces and groups in different natural resource sectors?", "newParagraph": "box 2 sample question profiling male female member armed force group n motivation joining armed force group linked natural resource n potential area return likely livelihood option identify potential natural resource sector support seasonality occupation related migration pattern communal natural resource question area return ddr participant access n use natural resource member armed force group identify potential hot spot n possibility employ jobvocational skill natural resource management n economic activity already undertaken prior joining armed force group different natural resource sector n interest undertake economic activity natural resource sector", "ProcessedSent": "n economic activity already undertaken prior joining armed force group different natural resource sector", "SentID": 11889 }, { "ParagraphID": 3274, - "Paragraph": "Box 2. Sample questions for the profiling of male and female members of armed forces and groups: \\n - Motivations for joining armed forces and groups linked to natural resources? \\n - Potential areas of return and likely livelihoods options to identify potential natural resource sectors to support? Seasonality of these occupations and related migration patterns? Are there communal natural resources in question in the area of return? Will DDR participants have access to these? \\n - The use of natural resources by the members of armed forces and groups to identify potential hot spots? \\n - Possibility to employ job\/vocational skills in natural resource management? \\n - Economic activities already undertaken prior to joining or while with armed forces and groups in different natural resource sectors? \\n - Interest to undertake economic activities in natural resource sectors?", + "Paragraph": "Box 2. Sample questions for the profiling of male and female members of armed forces and groups: \n - Motivations for joining armed forces and groups linked to natural resources? \n - Potential areas of return and likely livelihoods options to identify potential natural resource sectors to support? Seasonality of these occupations and related migration patterns? Are there communal natural resources in question in the area of return? Will DDR participants have access to these? \n - The use of natural resources by the members of armed forces and groups to identify potential hot spots? \n - Possibility to employ job\/vocational skills in natural resource management? \n - Economic activities already undertaken prior to joining or while with armed forces and groups in different natural resource sectors? \n - Interest to undertake economic activities in natural resource sectors?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -214032,7 +214032,7 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "6.1.2 Employment and livelihood opportunities", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n - Interest to undertake economic activities in natural resource sectors?", + "Sentence": "\n - Interest to undertake economic activities in natural resource sectors?", "newParagraph": "box 2 sample question profiling male female member armed force group n motivation joining armed force group linked natural resource n potential area return likely livelihood option identify potential natural resource sector support seasonality occupation related migration pattern communal natural resource question area return ddr participant access n use natural resource member armed force group identify potential hot spot n possibility employ jobvocational skill natural resource management n economic activity already undertaken prior joining armed force group different natural resource sector n interest undertake economic activity natural resource sector", "ProcessedSent": "n interest undertake economic activity natural resource sector", "SentID": 11890 @@ -215281,7 +215281,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3289, - "Paragraph": "Disarmament: Key questions \\n - How are weapons and ammunition being acquired? Are natural resource exploited to finance this? \\n - What steps can be taken to prevent the trade and trafficking of natural resources by armed forces and groups and\/or by organized criminal groups? \\n - In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of trafficked weapons in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and save lives? \\n - How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or conflict? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \\n - How can DDR programmes address the presence of children associated with armed forces and groups whom may have been used in the exploitation of natural resources? \\n - To what extent would the removal of weapons jeopardize security and economic opportunities for male and female ex-combatants and communities, including land tenure and access to critical livelihoods resources? \\n - When disarmament is currently impossible, can DDR related tools, such as transitional WAM be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the relinquishment of weapons? \\n - Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities? \\n - Is there evidence of armed forces engaging in criminal activities related to natural resources, including illicit trafficking of natural resources, related crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious human rights violations, and what are the risks of incorporating weapons and ammunition collected during disarmament into national stockpiles?", + "Paragraph": "Disarmament: Key questions \n - How are weapons and ammunition being acquired? Are natural resource exploited to finance this? \n - What steps can be taken to prevent the trade and trafficking of natural resources by armed forces and groups and\/or by organized criminal groups? \n - In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of trafficked weapons in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and save lives? \n - How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or conflict? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \n - How can DDR programmes address the presence of children associated with armed forces and groups whom may have been used in the exploitation of natural resources? \n - To what extent would the removal of weapons jeopardize security and economic opportunities for male and female ex-combatants and communities, including land tenure and access to critical livelihoods resources? \n - When disarmament is currently impossible, can DDR related tools, such as transitional WAM be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the relinquishment of weapons? \n - Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities? \n - Is there evidence of armed forces engaging in criminal activities related to natural resources, including illicit trafficking of natural resources, related crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious human rights violations, and what are the risks of incorporating weapons and ammunition collected during disarmament into national stockpiles?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -215292,14 +215292,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1 Disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Disarmament: Key questions \\n - How are weapons and ammunition being acquired?", + "Sentence": "Disarmament: Key questions \n - How are weapons and ammunition being acquired?", "newParagraph": "disarmament key question n weapon ammunition acquired natural resource exploited finance n step taken prevent trade trafficking natural resource armed force group andor organized criminal group n conflict setting step taken disrupt flow trafficked weapon order reduce capacity individual group engage armed conflict save life n ddr programme highlight constructive role woman may engaged illicit trafficking weapon andor conflict precaution taken avoid reinforcing creating genderbased inequality n ddr programme address presence child associated armed force group may used exploitation natural resource n extent would removal weapon jeopardize security economic opportunity male female excombatants community including land tenure access critical livelihood resource n disarmament currently impossible ddr related tool transitional wam implemented alternative stage demobilization reintegration offered prior disarmament gain trust contribute relinquishment weapon n proposed disarmament operation sufficient resource safely store weapon ammunition prevent diversion armed group engaged criminal activity n evidence armed force engaging criminal activity related natural resource including illicit trafficking natural resource related crime humanity war crime serious human right violation risk incorporating weapon ammunition collected disarmament national stockpile", "ProcessedSent": "disarmament key question n weapon ammunition acquired", "SentID": 11960 }, { "ParagraphID": 3289, - "Paragraph": "Disarmament: Key questions \\n - How are weapons and ammunition being acquired? Are natural resource exploited to finance this? \\n - What steps can be taken to prevent the trade and trafficking of natural resources by armed forces and groups and\/or by organized criminal groups? \\n - In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of trafficked weapons in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and save lives? \\n - How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or conflict? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \\n - How can DDR programmes address the presence of children associated with armed forces and groups whom may have been used in the exploitation of natural resources? \\n - To what extent would the removal of weapons jeopardize security and economic opportunities for male and female ex-combatants and communities, including land tenure and access to critical livelihoods resources? \\n - When disarmament is currently impossible, can DDR related tools, such as transitional WAM be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the relinquishment of weapons? \\n - Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities? \\n - Is there evidence of armed forces engaging in criminal activities related to natural resources, including illicit trafficking of natural resources, related crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious human rights violations, and what are the risks of incorporating weapons and ammunition collected during disarmament into national stockpiles?", + "Paragraph": "Disarmament: Key questions \n - How are weapons and ammunition being acquired? Are natural resource exploited to finance this? \n - What steps can be taken to prevent the trade and trafficking of natural resources by armed forces and groups and\/or by organized criminal groups? \n - In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of trafficked weapons in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and save lives? \n - How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or conflict? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \n - How can DDR programmes address the presence of children associated with armed forces and groups whom may have been used in the exploitation of natural resources? \n - To what extent would the removal of weapons jeopardize security and economic opportunities for male and female ex-combatants and communities, including land tenure and access to critical livelihoods resources? \n - When disarmament is currently impossible, can DDR related tools, such as transitional WAM be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the relinquishment of weapons? \n - Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities? \n - Is there evidence of armed forces engaging in criminal activities related to natural resources, including illicit trafficking of natural resources, related crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious human rights violations, and what are the risks of incorporating weapons and ammunition collected during disarmament into national stockpiles?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -215317,7 +215317,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3289, - "Paragraph": "Disarmament: Key questions \\n - How are weapons and ammunition being acquired? Are natural resource exploited to finance this? \\n - What steps can be taken to prevent the trade and trafficking of natural resources by armed forces and groups and\/or by organized criminal groups? \\n - In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of trafficked weapons in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and save lives? \\n - How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or conflict? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \\n - How can DDR programmes address the presence of children associated with armed forces and groups whom may have been used in the exploitation of natural resources? \\n - To what extent would the removal of weapons jeopardize security and economic opportunities for male and female ex-combatants and communities, including land tenure and access to critical livelihoods resources? \\n - When disarmament is currently impossible, can DDR related tools, such as transitional WAM be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the relinquishment of weapons? \\n - Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities? \\n - Is there evidence of armed forces engaging in criminal activities related to natural resources, including illicit trafficking of natural resources, related crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious human rights violations, and what are the risks of incorporating weapons and ammunition collected during disarmament into national stockpiles?", + "Paragraph": "Disarmament: Key questions \n - How are weapons and ammunition being acquired? Are natural resource exploited to finance this? \n - What steps can be taken to prevent the trade and trafficking of natural resources by armed forces and groups and\/or by organized criminal groups? \n - In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of trafficked weapons in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and save lives? \n - How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or conflict? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \n - How can DDR programmes address the presence of children associated with armed forces and groups whom may have been used in the exploitation of natural resources? \n - To what extent would the removal of weapons jeopardize security and economic opportunities for male and female ex-combatants and communities, including land tenure and access to critical livelihoods resources? \n - When disarmament is currently impossible, can DDR related tools, such as transitional WAM be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the relinquishment of weapons? \n - Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities? \n - Is there evidence of armed forces engaging in criminal activities related to natural resources, including illicit trafficking of natural resources, related crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious human rights violations, and what are the risks of incorporating weapons and ammunition collected during disarmament into national stockpiles?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -215328,14 +215328,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1 Disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n - What steps can be taken to prevent the trade and trafficking of natural resources by armed forces and groups and\/or by organized criminal groups?", + "Sentence": "\n - What steps can be taken to prevent the trade and trafficking of natural resources by armed forces and groups and\/or by organized criminal groups?", "newParagraph": "disarmament key question n weapon ammunition acquired natural resource exploited finance n step taken prevent trade trafficking natural resource armed force group andor organized criminal group n conflict setting step taken disrupt flow trafficked weapon order reduce capacity individual group engage armed conflict save life n ddr programme highlight constructive role woman may engaged illicit trafficking weapon andor conflict precaution taken avoid reinforcing creating genderbased inequality n ddr programme address presence child associated armed force group may used exploitation natural resource n extent would removal weapon jeopardize security economic opportunity male female excombatants community including land tenure access critical livelihood resource n disarmament currently impossible ddr related tool transitional wam implemented alternative stage demobilization reintegration offered prior disarmament gain trust contribute relinquishment weapon n proposed disarmament operation sufficient resource safely store weapon ammunition prevent diversion armed group engaged criminal activity n evidence armed force engaging criminal activity related natural resource including illicit trafficking natural resource related crime humanity war crime serious human right violation risk incorporating weapon ammunition collected disarmament national stockpile", "ProcessedSent": "n step taken prevent trade trafficking natural resource armed force group andor organized criminal group", "SentID": 11962 }, { "ParagraphID": 3289, - "Paragraph": "Disarmament: Key questions \\n - How are weapons and ammunition being acquired? Are natural resource exploited to finance this? \\n - What steps can be taken to prevent the trade and trafficking of natural resources by armed forces and groups and\/or by organized criminal groups? \\n - In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of trafficked weapons in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and save lives? \\n - How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or conflict? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \\n - How can DDR programmes address the presence of children associated with armed forces and groups whom may have been used in the exploitation of natural resources? \\n - To what extent would the removal of weapons jeopardize security and economic opportunities for male and female ex-combatants and communities, including land tenure and access to critical livelihoods resources? \\n - When disarmament is currently impossible, can DDR related tools, such as transitional WAM be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the relinquishment of weapons? \\n - Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities? \\n - Is there evidence of armed forces engaging in criminal activities related to natural resources, including illicit trafficking of natural resources, related crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious human rights violations, and what are the risks of incorporating weapons and ammunition collected during disarmament into national stockpiles?", + "Paragraph": "Disarmament: Key questions \n - How are weapons and ammunition being acquired? Are natural resource exploited to finance this? \n - What steps can be taken to prevent the trade and trafficking of natural resources by armed forces and groups and\/or by organized criminal groups? \n - In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of trafficked weapons in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and save lives? \n - How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or conflict? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \n - How can DDR programmes address the presence of children associated with armed forces and groups whom may have been used in the exploitation of natural resources? \n - To what extent would the removal of weapons jeopardize security and economic opportunities for male and female ex-combatants and communities, including land tenure and access to critical livelihoods resources? \n - When disarmament is currently impossible, can DDR related tools, such as transitional WAM be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the relinquishment of weapons? \n - Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities? \n - Is there evidence of armed forces engaging in criminal activities related to natural resources, including illicit trafficking of natural resources, related crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious human rights violations, and what are the risks of incorporating weapons and ammunition collected during disarmament into national stockpiles?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -215346,14 +215346,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1 Disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n - In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of trafficked weapons in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and save lives?", + "Sentence": "\n - In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of trafficked weapons in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and save lives?", "newParagraph": "disarmament key question n weapon ammunition acquired natural resource exploited finance n step taken prevent trade trafficking natural resource armed force group andor organized criminal group n conflict setting step taken disrupt flow trafficked weapon order reduce capacity individual group engage armed conflict save life n ddr programme highlight constructive role woman may engaged illicit trafficking weapon andor conflict precaution taken avoid reinforcing creating genderbased inequality n ddr programme address presence child associated armed force group may used exploitation natural resource n extent would removal weapon jeopardize security economic opportunity male female excombatants community including land tenure access critical livelihood resource n disarmament currently impossible ddr related tool transitional wam implemented alternative stage demobilization reintegration offered prior disarmament gain trust contribute relinquishment weapon n proposed disarmament operation sufficient resource safely store weapon ammunition prevent diversion armed group engaged criminal activity n evidence armed force engaging criminal activity related natural resource including illicit trafficking natural resource related crime humanity war crime serious human right violation risk incorporating weapon ammunition collected disarmament national stockpile", "ProcessedSent": "n conflict setting step taken disrupt flow trafficked weapon order reduce capacity individual group engage armed conflict save life", "SentID": 11963 }, { "ParagraphID": 3289, - "Paragraph": "Disarmament: Key questions \\n - How are weapons and ammunition being acquired? Are natural resource exploited to finance this? \\n - What steps can be taken to prevent the trade and trafficking of natural resources by armed forces and groups and\/or by organized criminal groups? \\n - In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of trafficked weapons in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and save lives? \\n - How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or conflict? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \\n - How can DDR programmes address the presence of children associated with armed forces and groups whom may have been used in the exploitation of natural resources? \\n - To what extent would the removal of weapons jeopardize security and economic opportunities for male and female ex-combatants and communities, including land tenure and access to critical livelihoods resources? \\n - When disarmament is currently impossible, can DDR related tools, such as transitional WAM be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the relinquishment of weapons? \\n - Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities? \\n - Is there evidence of armed forces engaging in criminal activities related to natural resources, including illicit trafficking of natural resources, related crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious human rights violations, and what are the risks of incorporating weapons and ammunition collected during disarmament into national stockpiles?", + "Paragraph": "Disarmament: Key questions \n - How are weapons and ammunition being acquired? Are natural resource exploited to finance this? \n - What steps can be taken to prevent the trade and trafficking of natural resources by armed forces and groups and\/or by organized criminal groups? \n - In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of trafficked weapons in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and save lives? \n - How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or conflict? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \n - How can DDR programmes address the presence of children associated with armed forces and groups whom may have been used in the exploitation of natural resources? \n - To what extent would the removal of weapons jeopardize security and economic opportunities for male and female ex-combatants and communities, including land tenure and access to critical livelihoods resources? \n - When disarmament is currently impossible, can DDR related tools, such as transitional WAM be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the relinquishment of weapons? \n - Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities? \n - Is there evidence of armed forces engaging in criminal activities related to natural resources, including illicit trafficking of natural resources, related crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious human rights violations, and what are the risks of incorporating weapons and ammunition collected during disarmament into national stockpiles?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -215364,14 +215364,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1 Disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n - How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or conflict?", + "Sentence": "\n - How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or conflict?", "newParagraph": "disarmament key question n weapon ammunition acquired natural resource exploited finance n step taken prevent trade trafficking natural resource armed force group andor organized criminal group n conflict setting step taken disrupt flow trafficked weapon order reduce capacity individual group engage armed conflict save life n ddr programme highlight constructive role woman may engaged illicit trafficking weapon andor conflict precaution taken avoid reinforcing creating genderbased inequality n ddr programme address presence child associated armed force group may used exploitation natural resource n extent would removal weapon jeopardize security economic opportunity male female excombatants community including land tenure access critical livelihood resource n disarmament currently impossible ddr related tool transitional wam implemented alternative stage demobilization reintegration offered prior disarmament gain trust contribute relinquishment weapon n proposed disarmament operation sufficient resource safely store weapon ammunition prevent diversion armed group engaged criminal activity n evidence armed force engaging criminal activity related natural resource including illicit trafficking natural resource related crime humanity war crime serious human right violation risk incorporating weapon ammunition collected disarmament national stockpile", "ProcessedSent": "n ddr programme highlight constructive role woman may engaged illicit trafficking weapon andor conflict", "SentID": 11964 }, { "ParagraphID": 3289, - "Paragraph": "Disarmament: Key questions \\n - How are weapons and ammunition being acquired? Are natural resource exploited to finance this? \\n - What steps can be taken to prevent the trade and trafficking of natural resources by armed forces and groups and\/or by organized criminal groups? \\n - In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of trafficked weapons in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and save lives? \\n - How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or conflict? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \\n - How can DDR programmes address the presence of children associated with armed forces and groups whom may have been used in the exploitation of natural resources? \\n - To what extent would the removal of weapons jeopardize security and economic opportunities for male and female ex-combatants and communities, including land tenure and access to critical livelihoods resources? \\n - When disarmament is currently impossible, can DDR related tools, such as transitional WAM be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the relinquishment of weapons? \\n - Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities? \\n - Is there evidence of armed forces engaging in criminal activities related to natural resources, including illicit trafficking of natural resources, related crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious human rights violations, and what are the risks of incorporating weapons and ammunition collected during disarmament into national stockpiles?", + "Paragraph": "Disarmament: Key questions \n - How are weapons and ammunition being acquired? Are natural resource exploited to finance this? \n - What steps can be taken to prevent the trade and trafficking of natural resources by armed forces and groups and\/or by organized criminal groups? \n - In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of trafficked weapons in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and save lives? \n - How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or conflict? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \n - How can DDR programmes address the presence of children associated with armed forces and groups whom may have been used in the exploitation of natural resources? \n - To what extent would the removal of weapons jeopardize security and economic opportunities for male and female ex-combatants and communities, including land tenure and access to critical livelihoods resources? \n - When disarmament is currently impossible, can DDR related tools, such as transitional WAM be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the relinquishment of weapons? \n - Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities? \n - Is there evidence of armed forces engaging in criminal activities related to natural resources, including illicit trafficking of natural resources, related crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious human rights violations, and what are the risks of incorporating weapons and ammunition collected during disarmament into national stockpiles?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -215389,7 +215389,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3289, - "Paragraph": "Disarmament: Key questions \\n - How are weapons and ammunition being acquired? Are natural resource exploited to finance this? \\n - What steps can be taken to prevent the trade and trafficking of natural resources by armed forces and groups and\/or by organized criminal groups? \\n - In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of trafficked weapons in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and save lives? \\n - How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or conflict? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \\n - How can DDR programmes address the presence of children associated with armed forces and groups whom may have been used in the exploitation of natural resources? \\n - To what extent would the removal of weapons jeopardize security and economic opportunities for male and female ex-combatants and communities, including land tenure and access to critical livelihoods resources? \\n - When disarmament is currently impossible, can DDR related tools, such as transitional WAM be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the relinquishment of weapons? \\n - Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities? \\n - Is there evidence of armed forces engaging in criminal activities related to natural resources, including illicit trafficking of natural resources, related crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious human rights violations, and what are the risks of incorporating weapons and ammunition collected during disarmament into national stockpiles?", + "Paragraph": "Disarmament: Key questions \n - How are weapons and ammunition being acquired? Are natural resource exploited to finance this? \n - What steps can be taken to prevent the trade and trafficking of natural resources by armed forces and groups and\/or by organized criminal groups? \n - In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of trafficked weapons in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and save lives? \n - How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or conflict? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \n - How can DDR programmes address the presence of children associated with armed forces and groups whom may have been used in the exploitation of natural resources? \n - To what extent would the removal of weapons jeopardize security and economic opportunities for male and female ex-combatants and communities, including land tenure and access to critical livelihoods resources? \n - When disarmament is currently impossible, can DDR related tools, such as transitional WAM be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the relinquishment of weapons? \n - Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities? \n - Is there evidence of armed forces engaging in criminal activities related to natural resources, including illicit trafficking of natural resources, related crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious human rights violations, and what are the risks of incorporating weapons and ammunition collected during disarmament into national stockpiles?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -215400,14 +215400,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1 Disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n - How can DDR programmes address the presence of children associated with armed forces and groups whom may have been used in the exploitation of natural resources?", + "Sentence": "\n - How can DDR programmes address the presence of children associated with armed forces and groups whom may have been used in the exploitation of natural resources?", "newParagraph": "disarmament key question n weapon ammunition acquired natural resource exploited finance n step taken prevent trade trafficking natural resource armed force group andor organized criminal group n conflict setting step taken disrupt flow trafficked weapon order reduce capacity individual group engage armed conflict save life n ddr programme highlight constructive role woman may engaged illicit trafficking weapon andor conflict precaution taken avoid reinforcing creating genderbased inequality n ddr programme address presence child associated armed force group may used exploitation natural resource n extent would removal weapon jeopardize security economic opportunity male female excombatants community including land tenure access critical livelihood resource n disarmament currently impossible ddr related tool transitional wam implemented alternative stage demobilization reintegration offered prior disarmament gain trust contribute relinquishment weapon n proposed disarmament operation sufficient resource safely store weapon ammunition prevent diversion armed group engaged criminal activity n evidence armed force engaging criminal activity related natural resource including illicit trafficking natural resource related crime humanity war crime serious human right violation risk incorporating weapon ammunition collected disarmament national stockpile", "ProcessedSent": "n ddr programme address presence child associated armed force group may used exploitation natural resource", "SentID": 11966 }, { "ParagraphID": 3289, - "Paragraph": "Disarmament: Key questions \\n - How are weapons and ammunition being acquired? Are natural resource exploited to finance this? \\n - What steps can be taken to prevent the trade and trafficking of natural resources by armed forces and groups and\/or by organized criminal groups? \\n - In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of trafficked weapons in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and save lives? \\n - How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or conflict? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \\n - How can DDR programmes address the presence of children associated with armed forces and groups whom may have been used in the exploitation of natural resources? \\n - To what extent would the removal of weapons jeopardize security and economic opportunities for male and female ex-combatants and communities, including land tenure and access to critical livelihoods resources? \\n - When disarmament is currently impossible, can DDR related tools, such as transitional WAM be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the relinquishment of weapons? \\n - Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities? \\n - Is there evidence of armed forces engaging in criminal activities related to natural resources, including illicit trafficking of natural resources, related crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious human rights violations, and what are the risks of incorporating weapons and ammunition collected during disarmament into national stockpiles?", + "Paragraph": "Disarmament: Key questions \n - How are weapons and ammunition being acquired? Are natural resource exploited to finance this? \n - What steps can be taken to prevent the trade and trafficking of natural resources by armed forces and groups and\/or by organized criminal groups? \n - In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of trafficked weapons in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and save lives? \n - How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or conflict? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \n - How can DDR programmes address the presence of children associated with armed forces and groups whom may have been used in the exploitation of natural resources? \n - To what extent would the removal of weapons jeopardize security and economic opportunities for male and female ex-combatants and communities, including land tenure and access to critical livelihoods resources? \n - When disarmament is currently impossible, can DDR related tools, such as transitional WAM be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the relinquishment of weapons? \n - Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities? \n - Is there evidence of armed forces engaging in criminal activities related to natural resources, including illicit trafficking of natural resources, related crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious human rights violations, and what are the risks of incorporating weapons and ammunition collected during disarmament into national stockpiles?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -215418,14 +215418,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1 Disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n - To what extent would the removal of weapons jeopardize security and economic opportunities for male and female ex-combatants and communities, including land tenure and access to critical livelihoods resources?", + "Sentence": "\n - To what extent would the removal of weapons jeopardize security and economic opportunities for male and female ex-combatants and communities, including land tenure and access to critical livelihoods resources?", "newParagraph": "disarmament key question n weapon ammunition acquired natural resource exploited finance n step taken prevent trade trafficking natural resource armed force group andor organized criminal group n conflict setting step taken disrupt flow trafficked weapon order reduce capacity individual group engage armed conflict save life n ddr programme highlight constructive role woman may engaged illicit trafficking weapon andor conflict precaution taken avoid reinforcing creating genderbased inequality n ddr programme address presence child associated armed force group may used exploitation natural resource n extent would removal weapon jeopardize security economic opportunity male female excombatants community including land tenure access critical livelihood resource n disarmament currently impossible ddr related tool transitional wam implemented alternative stage demobilization reintegration offered prior disarmament gain trust contribute relinquishment weapon n proposed disarmament operation sufficient resource safely store weapon ammunition prevent diversion armed group engaged criminal activity n evidence armed force engaging criminal activity related natural resource including illicit trafficking natural resource related crime humanity war crime serious human right violation risk incorporating weapon ammunition collected disarmament national stockpile", "ProcessedSent": "n extent would removal weapon jeopardize security economic opportunity male female excombatants community including land tenure access critical livelihood resource", "SentID": 11967 }, { "ParagraphID": 3289, - "Paragraph": "Disarmament: Key questions \\n - How are weapons and ammunition being acquired? Are natural resource exploited to finance this? \\n - What steps can be taken to prevent the trade and trafficking of natural resources by armed forces and groups and\/or by organized criminal groups? \\n - In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of trafficked weapons in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and save lives? \\n - How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or conflict? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \\n - How can DDR programmes address the presence of children associated with armed forces and groups whom may have been used in the exploitation of natural resources? \\n - To what extent would the removal of weapons jeopardize security and economic opportunities for male and female ex-combatants and communities, including land tenure and access to critical livelihoods resources? \\n - When disarmament is currently impossible, can DDR related tools, such as transitional WAM be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the relinquishment of weapons? \\n - Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities? \\n - Is there evidence of armed forces engaging in criminal activities related to natural resources, including illicit trafficking of natural resources, related crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious human rights violations, and what are the risks of incorporating weapons and ammunition collected during disarmament into national stockpiles?", + "Paragraph": "Disarmament: Key questions \n - How are weapons and ammunition being acquired? Are natural resource exploited to finance this? \n - What steps can be taken to prevent the trade and trafficking of natural resources by armed forces and groups and\/or by organized criminal groups? \n - In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of trafficked weapons in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and save lives? \n - How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or conflict? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \n - How can DDR programmes address the presence of children associated with armed forces and groups whom may have been used in the exploitation of natural resources? \n - To what extent would the removal of weapons jeopardize security and economic opportunities for male and female ex-combatants and communities, including land tenure and access to critical livelihoods resources? \n - When disarmament is currently impossible, can DDR related tools, such as transitional WAM be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the relinquishment of weapons? \n - Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities? \n - Is there evidence of armed forces engaging in criminal activities related to natural resources, including illicit trafficking of natural resources, related crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious human rights violations, and what are the risks of incorporating weapons and ammunition collected during disarmament into national stockpiles?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -215436,14 +215436,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1 Disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n - When disarmament is currently impossible, can DDR related tools, such as transitional WAM be implemented?", + "Sentence": "\n - When disarmament is currently impossible, can DDR related tools, such as transitional WAM be implemented?", "newParagraph": "disarmament key question n weapon ammunition acquired natural resource exploited finance n step taken prevent trade trafficking natural resource armed force group andor organized criminal group n conflict setting step taken disrupt flow trafficked weapon order reduce capacity individual group engage armed conflict save life n ddr programme highlight constructive role woman may engaged illicit trafficking weapon andor conflict precaution taken avoid reinforcing creating genderbased inequality n ddr programme address presence child associated armed force group may used exploitation natural resource n extent would removal weapon jeopardize security economic opportunity male female excombatants community including land tenure access critical livelihood resource n disarmament currently impossible ddr related tool transitional wam implemented alternative stage demobilization reintegration offered prior disarmament gain trust contribute relinquishment weapon n proposed disarmament operation sufficient resource safely store weapon ammunition prevent diversion armed group engaged criminal activity n evidence armed force engaging criminal activity related natural resource including illicit trafficking natural resource related crime humanity war crime serious human right violation risk incorporating weapon ammunition collected disarmament national stockpile", "ProcessedSent": "n disarmament currently impossible ddr related tool transitional wam implemented", "SentID": 11968 }, { "ParagraphID": 3289, - "Paragraph": "Disarmament: Key questions \\n - How are weapons and ammunition being acquired? Are natural resource exploited to finance this? \\n - What steps can be taken to prevent the trade and trafficking of natural resources by armed forces and groups and\/or by organized criminal groups? \\n - In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of trafficked weapons in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and save lives? \\n - How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or conflict? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \\n - How can DDR programmes address the presence of children associated with armed forces and groups whom may have been used in the exploitation of natural resources? \\n - To what extent would the removal of weapons jeopardize security and economic opportunities for male and female ex-combatants and communities, including land tenure and access to critical livelihoods resources? \\n - When disarmament is currently impossible, can DDR related tools, such as transitional WAM be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the relinquishment of weapons? \\n - Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities? \\n - Is there evidence of armed forces engaging in criminal activities related to natural resources, including illicit trafficking of natural resources, related crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious human rights violations, and what are the risks of incorporating weapons and ammunition collected during disarmament into national stockpiles?", + "Paragraph": "Disarmament: Key questions \n - How are weapons and ammunition being acquired? Are natural resource exploited to finance this? \n - What steps can be taken to prevent the trade and trafficking of natural resources by armed forces and groups and\/or by organized criminal groups? \n - In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of trafficked weapons in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and save lives? \n - How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or conflict? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \n - How can DDR programmes address the presence of children associated with armed forces and groups whom may have been used in the exploitation of natural resources? \n - To what extent would the removal of weapons jeopardize security and economic opportunities for male and female ex-combatants and communities, including land tenure and access to critical livelihoods resources? \n - When disarmament is currently impossible, can DDR related tools, such as transitional WAM be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the relinquishment of weapons? \n - Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities? \n - Is there evidence of armed forces engaging in criminal activities related to natural resources, including illicit trafficking of natural resources, related crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious human rights violations, and what are the risks of incorporating weapons and ammunition collected during disarmament into national stockpiles?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -215461,7 +215461,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3289, - "Paragraph": "Disarmament: Key questions \\n - How are weapons and ammunition being acquired? Are natural resource exploited to finance this? \\n - What steps can be taken to prevent the trade and trafficking of natural resources by armed forces and groups and\/or by organized criminal groups? \\n - In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of trafficked weapons in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and save lives? \\n - How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or conflict? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \\n - How can DDR programmes address the presence of children associated with armed forces and groups whom may have been used in the exploitation of natural resources? \\n - To what extent would the removal of weapons jeopardize security and economic opportunities for male and female ex-combatants and communities, including land tenure and access to critical livelihoods resources? \\n - When disarmament is currently impossible, can DDR related tools, such as transitional WAM be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the relinquishment of weapons? \\n - Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities? \\n - Is there evidence of armed forces engaging in criminal activities related to natural resources, including illicit trafficking of natural resources, related crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious human rights violations, and what are the risks of incorporating weapons and ammunition collected during disarmament into national stockpiles?", + "Paragraph": "Disarmament: Key questions \n - How are weapons and ammunition being acquired? Are natural resource exploited to finance this? \n - What steps can be taken to prevent the trade and trafficking of natural resources by armed forces and groups and\/or by organized criminal groups? \n - In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of trafficked weapons in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and save lives? \n - How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or conflict? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \n - How can DDR programmes address the presence of children associated with armed forces and groups whom may have been used in the exploitation of natural resources? \n - To what extent would the removal of weapons jeopardize security and economic opportunities for male and female ex-combatants and communities, including land tenure and access to critical livelihoods resources? \n - When disarmament is currently impossible, can DDR related tools, such as transitional WAM be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the relinquishment of weapons? \n - Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities? \n - Is there evidence of armed forces engaging in criminal activities related to natural resources, including illicit trafficking of natural resources, related crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious human rights violations, and what are the risks of incorporating weapons and ammunition collected during disarmament into national stockpiles?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -215472,14 +215472,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1 Disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n - Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities?", + "Sentence": "\n - Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities?", "newParagraph": "disarmament key question n weapon ammunition acquired natural resource exploited finance n step taken prevent trade trafficking natural resource armed force group andor organized criminal group n conflict setting step taken disrupt flow trafficked weapon order reduce capacity individual group engage armed conflict save life n ddr programme highlight constructive role woman may engaged illicit trafficking weapon andor conflict precaution taken avoid reinforcing creating genderbased inequality n ddr programme address presence child associated armed force group may used exploitation natural resource n extent would removal weapon jeopardize security economic opportunity male female excombatants community including land tenure access critical livelihood resource n disarmament currently impossible ddr related tool transitional wam implemented alternative stage demobilization reintegration offered prior disarmament gain trust contribute relinquishment weapon n proposed disarmament operation sufficient resource safely store weapon ammunition prevent diversion armed group engaged criminal activity n evidence armed force engaging criminal activity related natural resource including illicit trafficking natural resource related crime humanity war crime serious human right violation risk incorporating weapon ammunition collected disarmament national stockpile", "ProcessedSent": "n proposed disarmament operation sufficient resource safely store weapon ammunition prevent diversion armed group engaged criminal activity", "SentID": 11970 }, { "ParagraphID": 3289, - "Paragraph": "Disarmament: Key questions \\n - How are weapons and ammunition being acquired? Are natural resource exploited to finance this? \\n - What steps can be taken to prevent the trade and trafficking of natural resources by armed forces and groups and\/or by organized criminal groups? \\n - In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of trafficked weapons in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and save lives? \\n - How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or conflict? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \\n - How can DDR programmes address the presence of children associated with armed forces and groups whom may have been used in the exploitation of natural resources? \\n - To what extent would the removal of weapons jeopardize security and economic opportunities for male and female ex-combatants and communities, including land tenure and access to critical livelihoods resources? \\n - When disarmament is currently impossible, can DDR related tools, such as transitional WAM be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the relinquishment of weapons? \\n - Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities? \\n - Is there evidence of armed forces engaging in criminal activities related to natural resources, including illicit trafficking of natural resources, related crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious human rights violations, and what are the risks of incorporating weapons and ammunition collected during disarmament into national stockpiles?", + "Paragraph": "Disarmament: Key questions \n - How are weapons and ammunition being acquired? Are natural resource exploited to finance this? \n - What steps can be taken to prevent the trade and trafficking of natural resources by armed forces and groups and\/or by organized criminal groups? \n - In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of trafficked weapons in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and save lives? \n - How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or conflict? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \n - How can DDR programmes address the presence of children associated with armed forces and groups whom may have been used in the exploitation of natural resources? \n - To what extent would the removal of weapons jeopardize security and economic opportunities for male and female ex-combatants and communities, including land tenure and access to critical livelihoods resources? \n - When disarmament is currently impossible, can DDR related tools, such as transitional WAM be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the relinquishment of weapons? \n - Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities? \n - Is there evidence of armed forces engaging in criminal activities related to natural resources, including illicit trafficking of natural resources, related crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious human rights violations, and what are the risks of incorporating weapons and ammunition collected during disarmament into national stockpiles?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -215490,7 +215490,7 @@ "Heading2": "7.1 Disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n - Is there evidence of armed forces engaging in criminal activities related to natural resources, including illicit trafficking of natural resources, related crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious human rights violations, and what are the risks of incorporating weapons and ammunition collected during disarmament into national stockpiles?", + "Sentence": "\n - Is there evidence of armed forces engaging in criminal activities related to natural resources, including illicit trafficking of natural resources, related crimes against humanity, war crimes and serious human rights violations, and what are the risks of incorporating weapons and ammunition collected during disarmament into national stockpiles?", "newParagraph": "disarmament key question n weapon ammunition acquired natural resource exploited finance n step taken prevent trade trafficking natural resource armed force group andor organized criminal group n conflict setting step taken disrupt flow trafficked weapon order reduce capacity individual group engage armed conflict save life n ddr programme highlight constructive role woman may engaged illicit trafficking weapon andor conflict precaution taken avoid reinforcing creating genderbased inequality n ddr programme address presence child associated armed force group may used exploitation natural resource n extent would removal weapon jeopardize security economic opportunity male female excombatants community including land tenure access critical livelihood resource n disarmament currently impossible ddr related tool transitional wam implemented alternative stage demobilization reintegration offered prior disarmament gain trust contribute relinquishment weapon n proposed disarmament operation sufficient resource safely store weapon ammunition prevent diversion armed group engaged criminal activity n evidence armed force engaging criminal activity related natural resource including illicit trafficking natural resource related crime humanity war crime serious human right violation risk incorporating weapon ammunition collected disarmament national stockpile", "ProcessedSent": "n evidence armed force engaging criminal activity related natural resource including illicit trafficking natural resource related crime humanity war crime serious human right violation risk incorporating weapon ammunition collected disarmament national stockpile", "SentID": 11971 @@ -215623,7 +215623,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3292, - "Paragraph": "Box 4. Sample quick-impact projects Soil conservation and stabilization \\n - the construction of soil conservation structures, including terracing or planting of soil stabilizing vegetation \\n - stabilization of riverbanks and other natural flood control structures through increased vegetation Restoration of degraded or deforested lands \\n - reforestation or afforestation of degraded sites, where determined to be ecologically appropriate, ideally with native species \\n - establishment of renewable wood lots for firewood and charcoal \\n - restoration of riverine vegetation Reparation of critical public infrastructures for sanitation, water and transportation \\n - desilting of irrigation canals and construction of rainwater catchments or earth dams \\n - reparation of roads, drainage canals, groundwater wells, irrigation canals and sanitation infrastructure \\n - development of systems for municipal sanitation, including recycling and creation of designated areas for waste", + "Paragraph": "Box 4. Sample quick-impact projects Soil conservation and stabilization \n - the construction of soil conservation structures, including terracing or planting of soil stabilizing vegetation \n - stabilization of riverbanks and other natural flood control structures through increased vegetation Restoration of degraded or deforested lands \n - reforestation or afforestation of degraded sites, where determined to be ecologically appropriate, ideally with native species \n - establishment of renewable wood lots for firewood and charcoal \n - restoration of riverine vegetation Reparation of critical public infrastructures for sanitation, water and transportation \n - desilting of irrigation canals and construction of rainwater catchments or earth dams \n - reparation of roads, drainage canals, groundwater wells, irrigation canals and sanitation infrastructure \n - development of systems for municipal sanitation, including recycling and creation of designated areas for waste", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -215641,7 +215641,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3292, - "Paragraph": "Box 4. Sample quick-impact projects Soil conservation and stabilization \\n - the construction of soil conservation structures, including terracing or planting of soil stabilizing vegetation \\n - stabilization of riverbanks and other natural flood control structures through increased vegetation Restoration of degraded or deforested lands \\n - reforestation or afforestation of degraded sites, where determined to be ecologically appropriate, ideally with native species \\n - establishment of renewable wood lots for firewood and charcoal \\n - restoration of riverine vegetation Reparation of critical public infrastructures for sanitation, water and transportation \\n - desilting of irrigation canals and construction of rainwater catchments or earth dams \\n - reparation of roads, drainage canals, groundwater wells, irrigation canals and sanitation infrastructure \\n - development of systems for municipal sanitation, including recycling and creation of designated areas for waste", + "Paragraph": "Box 4. Sample quick-impact projects Soil conservation and stabilization \n - the construction of soil conservation structures, including terracing or planting of soil stabilizing vegetation \n - stabilization of riverbanks and other natural flood control structures through increased vegetation Restoration of degraded or deforested lands \n - reforestation or afforestation of degraded sites, where determined to be ecologically appropriate, ideally with native species \n - establishment of renewable wood lots for firewood and charcoal \n - restoration of riverine vegetation Reparation of critical public infrastructures for sanitation, water and transportation \n - desilting of irrigation canals and construction of rainwater catchments or earth dams \n - reparation of roads, drainage canals, groundwater wells, irrigation canals and sanitation infrastructure \n - development of systems for municipal sanitation, including recycling and creation of designated areas for waste", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -215652,7 +215652,7 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Demobilization", "Heading3": "7.2.1 Quick-impact projects in natural resource management", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Sample quick-impact projects Soil conservation and stabilization \\n - the construction of soil conservation structures, including terracing or planting of soil stabilizing vegetation \\n - stabilization of riverbanks and other natural flood control structures through increased vegetation Restoration of degraded or deforested lands \\n - reforestation or afforestation of degraded sites, where determined to be ecologically appropriate, ideally with native species \\n - establishment of renewable wood lots for firewood and charcoal \\n - restoration of riverine vegetation Reparation of critical public infrastructures for sanitation, water and transportation \\n - desilting of irrigation canals and construction of rainwater catchments or earth dams \\n - reparation of roads, drainage canals, groundwater wells, irrigation canals and sanitation infrastructure \\n - development of systems for municipal sanitation, including recycling and creation of designated areas for waste", + "Sentence": "Sample quick-impact projects Soil conservation and stabilization \n - the construction of soil conservation structures, including terracing or planting of soil stabilizing vegetation \n - stabilization of riverbanks and other natural flood control structures through increased vegetation Restoration of degraded or deforested lands \n - reforestation or afforestation of degraded sites, where determined to be ecologically appropriate, ideally with native species \n - establishment of renewable wood lots for firewood and charcoal \n - restoration of riverine vegetation Reparation of critical public infrastructures for sanitation, water and transportation \n - desilting of irrigation canals and construction of rainwater catchments or earth dams \n - reparation of roads, drainage canals, groundwater wells, irrigation canals and sanitation infrastructure \n - development of systems for municipal sanitation, including recycling and creation of designated areas for waste", "newParagraph": "box 4 sample quickimpact project soil conservation stabilization n construction soil conservation structure including terracing planting soil stabilizing vegetation n stabilization riverbank natural flood control structure increased vegetation restoration degraded deforested land n reforestation afforestation degraded site determined ecologically appropriate ideally native specie n establishment renewable wood lot firewood charcoal n restoration riverine vegetation reparation critical public infrastructure sanitation water transportation n desilting irrigation canal construction rainwater catchment earth dam n reparation road drainage canal groundwater well irrigation canal sanitation infrastructure n development system municipal sanitation including recycling creation designated area waste", "ProcessedSent": "sample quickimpact project soil conservation stabilization n construction soil conservation structure including terracing planting soil stabilizing vegetation n stabilization riverbank natural flood control structure increased vegetation restoration degraded deforested land n reforestation afforestation degraded site determined ecologically appropriate ideally native specie n establishment renewable wood lot firewood charcoal n restoration riverine vegetation reparation critical public infrastructure sanitation water transportation n desilting irrigation canal construction rainwater catchment earth dam n reparation road drainage canal groundwater well irrigation canal sanitation infrastructure n development system municipal sanitation including recycling creation designated area waste", "SentID": 11980 @@ -215983,7 +215983,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3297, - "Paragraph": "Demobilization: Key questions \\n - What is the risk (if any) that reinsertion assistance will equip former members of armed forces and groups with skills that can be used to further exploit natural resources or engage in criminal activities? \\n - If skills training and catch-up education are provided as part of short-term reinsertion assistance, do they adequately initiate former members of armed forces and groups in the realities of the lawful economic and social environment, including as it pertains to natural resources? \\n - What safeguards can be put in place to prevent former members of armed forces and groups from continuing to engage in any illicit or licit exploitation, control over and\/or trade in natural resources linked to the conflict? \\n - What does demobilization offer that membership in armed forces and groups that are controlling or exploiting natural resources does not? Conversely, what does such membership in armed forces and groups offer that demobilization does not? What are the (perceived) benefits of continued engagement in illicit activities? \\n - How does demobilization address the specific needs of certain groups such as women and children who may have been recruited and used and\/or been victims of armed forces and groups involved in natural resource exploitation, control or trafficking in conflict?", + "Paragraph": "Demobilization: Key questions \n - What is the risk (if any) that reinsertion assistance will equip former members of armed forces and groups with skills that can be used to further exploit natural resources or engage in criminal activities? \n - If skills training and catch-up education are provided as part of short-term reinsertion assistance, do they adequately initiate former members of armed forces and groups in the realities of the lawful economic and social environment, including as it pertains to natural resources? \n - What safeguards can be put in place to prevent former members of armed forces and groups from continuing to engage in any illicit or licit exploitation, control over and\/or trade in natural resources linked to the conflict? \n - What does demobilization offer that membership in armed forces and groups that are controlling or exploiting natural resources does not? Conversely, what does such membership in armed forces and groups offer that demobilization does not? What are the (perceived) benefits of continued engagement in illicit activities? \n - How does demobilization address the specific needs of certain groups such as women and children who may have been recruited and used and\/or been victims of armed forces and groups involved in natural resource exploitation, control or trafficking in conflict?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -215994,14 +215994,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Demobilization", "Heading3": "7.2.3 Disposal and management of waste from conflict", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Demobilization: Key questions \\n - What is the risk (if any) that reinsertion assistance will equip former members of armed forces and groups with skills that can be used to further exploit natural resources or engage in criminal activities?", + "Sentence": "Demobilization: Key questions \n - What is the risk (if any) that reinsertion assistance will equip former members of armed forces and groups with skills that can be used to further exploit natural resources or engage in criminal activities?", "newParagraph": "demobilization key question n risk reinsertion assistance equip former member armed force group skill used exploit natural resource engage criminal activity n skill training catchup education provided part shortterm reinsertion assistance adequately initiate former member armed force group reality lawful economic social environment including pertains natural resource n safeguard put place prevent former member armed force group continuing engage illicit licit exploitation control andor trade natural resource linked conflict n demobilization offer membership armed force group controlling exploiting natural resource conversely membership armed force group offer demobilization perceived benefit continued engagement illicit activity n demobilization address specific need certain group woman child may recruited used andor victim armed force group involved natural resource exploitation control trafficking conflict", "ProcessedSent": "demobilization key question n risk reinsertion assistance equip former member armed force group skill used exploit natural resource engage criminal activity", "SentID": 11999 }, { "ParagraphID": 3297, - "Paragraph": "Demobilization: Key questions \\n - What is the risk (if any) that reinsertion assistance will equip former members of armed forces and groups with skills that can be used to further exploit natural resources or engage in criminal activities? \\n - If skills training and catch-up education are provided as part of short-term reinsertion assistance, do they adequately initiate former members of armed forces and groups in the realities of the lawful economic and social environment, including as it pertains to natural resources? \\n - What safeguards can be put in place to prevent former members of armed forces and groups from continuing to engage in any illicit or licit exploitation, control over and\/or trade in natural resources linked to the conflict? \\n - What does demobilization offer that membership in armed forces and groups that are controlling or exploiting natural resources does not? Conversely, what does such membership in armed forces and groups offer that demobilization does not? What are the (perceived) benefits of continued engagement in illicit activities? \\n - How does demobilization address the specific needs of certain groups such as women and children who may have been recruited and used and\/or been victims of armed forces and groups involved in natural resource exploitation, control or trafficking in conflict?", + "Paragraph": "Demobilization: Key questions \n - What is the risk (if any) that reinsertion assistance will equip former members of armed forces and groups with skills that can be used to further exploit natural resources or engage in criminal activities? \n - If skills training and catch-up education are provided as part of short-term reinsertion assistance, do they adequately initiate former members of armed forces and groups in the realities of the lawful economic and social environment, including as it pertains to natural resources? \n - What safeguards can be put in place to prevent former members of armed forces and groups from continuing to engage in any illicit or licit exploitation, control over and\/or trade in natural resources linked to the conflict? \n - What does demobilization offer that membership in armed forces and groups that are controlling or exploiting natural resources does not? Conversely, what does such membership in armed forces and groups offer that demobilization does not? What are the (perceived) benefits of continued engagement in illicit activities? \n - How does demobilization address the specific needs of certain groups such as women and children who may have been recruited and used and\/or been victims of armed forces and groups involved in natural resource exploitation, control or trafficking in conflict?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -216012,14 +216012,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Demobilization", "Heading3": "7.2.3 Disposal and management of waste from conflict", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n - If skills training and catch-up education are provided as part of short-term reinsertion assistance, do they adequately initiate former members of armed forces and groups in the realities of the lawful economic and social environment, including as it pertains to natural resources?", + "Sentence": "\n - If skills training and catch-up education are provided as part of short-term reinsertion assistance, do they adequately initiate former members of armed forces and groups in the realities of the lawful economic and social environment, including as it pertains to natural resources?", "newParagraph": "demobilization key question n risk reinsertion assistance equip former member armed force group skill used exploit natural resource engage criminal activity n skill training catchup education provided part shortterm reinsertion assistance adequately initiate former member armed force group reality lawful economic social environment including pertains natural resource n safeguard put place prevent former member armed force group continuing engage illicit licit exploitation control andor trade natural resource linked conflict n demobilization offer membership armed force group controlling exploiting natural resource conversely membership armed force group offer demobilization perceived benefit continued engagement illicit activity n demobilization address specific need certain group woman child may recruited used andor victim armed force group involved natural resource exploitation control trafficking conflict", "ProcessedSent": "n skill training catchup education provided part shortterm reinsertion assistance adequately initiate former member armed force group reality lawful economic social environment including pertains natural resource", "SentID": 12000 }, { "ParagraphID": 3297, - "Paragraph": "Demobilization: Key questions \\n - What is the risk (if any) that reinsertion assistance will equip former members of armed forces and groups with skills that can be used to further exploit natural resources or engage in criminal activities? \\n - If skills training and catch-up education are provided as part of short-term reinsertion assistance, do they adequately initiate former members of armed forces and groups in the realities of the lawful economic and social environment, including as it pertains to natural resources? \\n - What safeguards can be put in place to prevent former members of armed forces and groups from continuing to engage in any illicit or licit exploitation, control over and\/or trade in natural resources linked to the conflict? \\n - What does demobilization offer that membership in armed forces and groups that are controlling or exploiting natural resources does not? Conversely, what does such membership in armed forces and groups offer that demobilization does not? What are the (perceived) benefits of continued engagement in illicit activities? \\n - How does demobilization address the specific needs of certain groups such as women and children who may have been recruited and used and\/or been victims of armed forces and groups involved in natural resource exploitation, control or trafficking in conflict?", + "Paragraph": "Demobilization: Key questions \n - What is the risk (if any) that reinsertion assistance will equip former members of armed forces and groups with skills that can be used to further exploit natural resources or engage in criminal activities? \n - If skills training and catch-up education are provided as part of short-term reinsertion assistance, do they adequately initiate former members of armed forces and groups in the realities of the lawful economic and social environment, including as it pertains to natural resources? \n - What safeguards can be put in place to prevent former members of armed forces and groups from continuing to engage in any illicit or licit exploitation, control over and\/or trade in natural resources linked to the conflict? \n - What does demobilization offer that membership in armed forces and groups that are controlling or exploiting natural resources does not? Conversely, what does such membership in armed forces and groups offer that demobilization does not? What are the (perceived) benefits of continued engagement in illicit activities? \n - How does demobilization address the specific needs of certain groups such as women and children who may have been recruited and used and\/or been victims of armed forces and groups involved in natural resource exploitation, control or trafficking in conflict?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -216030,14 +216030,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Demobilization", "Heading3": "7.2.3 Disposal and management of waste from conflict", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n - What safeguards can be put in place to prevent former members of armed forces and groups from continuing to engage in any illicit or licit exploitation, control over and\/or trade in natural resources linked to the conflict?", + "Sentence": "\n - What safeguards can be put in place to prevent former members of armed forces and groups from continuing to engage in any illicit or licit exploitation, control over and\/or trade in natural resources linked to the conflict?", "newParagraph": "demobilization key question n risk reinsertion assistance equip former member armed force group skill used exploit natural resource engage criminal activity n skill training catchup education provided part shortterm reinsertion assistance adequately initiate former member armed force group reality lawful economic social environment including pertains natural resource n safeguard put place prevent former member armed force group continuing engage illicit licit exploitation control andor trade natural resource linked conflict n demobilization offer membership armed force group controlling exploiting natural resource conversely membership armed force group offer demobilization perceived benefit continued engagement illicit activity n demobilization address specific need certain group woman child may recruited used andor victim armed force group involved natural resource exploitation control trafficking conflict", "ProcessedSent": "n safeguard put place prevent former member armed force group continuing engage illicit licit exploitation control andor trade natural resource linked conflict", "SentID": 12001 }, { "ParagraphID": 3297, - "Paragraph": "Demobilization: Key questions \\n - What is the risk (if any) that reinsertion assistance will equip former members of armed forces and groups with skills that can be used to further exploit natural resources or engage in criminal activities? \\n - If skills training and catch-up education are provided as part of short-term reinsertion assistance, do they adequately initiate former members of armed forces and groups in the realities of the lawful economic and social environment, including as it pertains to natural resources? \\n - What safeguards can be put in place to prevent former members of armed forces and groups from continuing to engage in any illicit or licit exploitation, control over and\/or trade in natural resources linked to the conflict? \\n - What does demobilization offer that membership in armed forces and groups that are controlling or exploiting natural resources does not? Conversely, what does such membership in armed forces and groups offer that demobilization does not? What are the (perceived) benefits of continued engagement in illicit activities? \\n - How does demobilization address the specific needs of certain groups such as women and children who may have been recruited and used and\/or been victims of armed forces and groups involved in natural resource exploitation, control or trafficking in conflict?", + "Paragraph": "Demobilization: Key questions \n - What is the risk (if any) that reinsertion assistance will equip former members of armed forces and groups with skills that can be used to further exploit natural resources or engage in criminal activities? \n - If skills training and catch-up education are provided as part of short-term reinsertion assistance, do they adequately initiate former members of armed forces and groups in the realities of the lawful economic and social environment, including as it pertains to natural resources? \n - What safeguards can be put in place to prevent former members of armed forces and groups from continuing to engage in any illicit or licit exploitation, control over and\/or trade in natural resources linked to the conflict? \n - What does demobilization offer that membership in armed forces and groups that are controlling or exploiting natural resources does not? Conversely, what does such membership in armed forces and groups offer that demobilization does not? What are the (perceived) benefits of continued engagement in illicit activities? \n - How does demobilization address the specific needs of certain groups such as women and children who may have been recruited and used and\/or been victims of armed forces and groups involved in natural resource exploitation, control or trafficking in conflict?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -216048,14 +216048,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Demobilization", "Heading3": "7.2.3 Disposal and management of waste from conflict", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n - What does demobilization offer that membership in armed forces and groups that are controlling or exploiting natural resources does not?", + "Sentence": "\n - What does demobilization offer that membership in armed forces and groups that are controlling or exploiting natural resources does not?", "newParagraph": "demobilization key question n risk reinsertion assistance equip former member armed force group skill used exploit natural resource engage criminal activity n skill training catchup education provided part shortterm reinsertion assistance adequately initiate former member armed force group reality lawful economic social environment including pertains natural resource n safeguard put place prevent former member armed force group continuing engage illicit licit exploitation control andor trade natural resource linked conflict n demobilization offer membership armed force group controlling exploiting natural resource conversely membership armed force group offer demobilization perceived benefit continued engagement illicit activity n demobilization address specific need certain group woman child may recruited used andor victim armed force group involved natural resource exploitation control trafficking conflict", "ProcessedSent": "n demobilization offer membership armed force group controlling exploiting natural resource", "SentID": 12002 }, { "ParagraphID": 3297, - "Paragraph": "Demobilization: Key questions \\n - What is the risk (if any) that reinsertion assistance will equip former members of armed forces and groups with skills that can be used to further exploit natural resources or engage in criminal activities? \\n - If skills training and catch-up education are provided as part of short-term reinsertion assistance, do they adequately initiate former members of armed forces and groups in the realities of the lawful economic and social environment, including as it pertains to natural resources? \\n - What safeguards can be put in place to prevent former members of armed forces and groups from continuing to engage in any illicit or licit exploitation, control over and\/or trade in natural resources linked to the conflict? \\n - What does demobilization offer that membership in armed forces and groups that are controlling or exploiting natural resources does not? Conversely, what does such membership in armed forces and groups offer that demobilization does not? What are the (perceived) benefits of continued engagement in illicit activities? \\n - How does demobilization address the specific needs of certain groups such as women and children who may have been recruited and used and\/or been victims of armed forces and groups involved in natural resource exploitation, control or trafficking in conflict?", + "Paragraph": "Demobilization: Key questions \n - What is the risk (if any) that reinsertion assistance will equip former members of armed forces and groups with skills that can be used to further exploit natural resources or engage in criminal activities? \n - If skills training and catch-up education are provided as part of short-term reinsertion assistance, do they adequately initiate former members of armed forces and groups in the realities of the lawful economic and social environment, including as it pertains to natural resources? \n - What safeguards can be put in place to prevent former members of armed forces and groups from continuing to engage in any illicit or licit exploitation, control over and\/or trade in natural resources linked to the conflict? \n - What does demobilization offer that membership in armed forces and groups that are controlling or exploiting natural resources does not? Conversely, what does such membership in armed forces and groups offer that demobilization does not? What are the (perceived) benefits of continued engagement in illicit activities? \n - How does demobilization address the specific needs of certain groups such as women and children who may have been recruited and used and\/or been victims of armed forces and groups involved in natural resource exploitation, control or trafficking in conflict?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -216073,7 +216073,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3297, - "Paragraph": "Demobilization: Key questions \\n - What is the risk (if any) that reinsertion assistance will equip former members of armed forces and groups with skills that can be used to further exploit natural resources or engage in criminal activities? \\n - If skills training and catch-up education are provided as part of short-term reinsertion assistance, do they adequately initiate former members of armed forces and groups in the realities of the lawful economic and social environment, including as it pertains to natural resources? \\n - What safeguards can be put in place to prevent former members of armed forces and groups from continuing to engage in any illicit or licit exploitation, control over and\/or trade in natural resources linked to the conflict? \\n - What does demobilization offer that membership in armed forces and groups that are controlling or exploiting natural resources does not? Conversely, what does such membership in armed forces and groups offer that demobilization does not? What are the (perceived) benefits of continued engagement in illicit activities? \\n - How does demobilization address the specific needs of certain groups such as women and children who may have been recruited and used and\/or been victims of armed forces and groups involved in natural resource exploitation, control or trafficking in conflict?", + "Paragraph": "Demobilization: Key questions \n - What is the risk (if any) that reinsertion assistance will equip former members of armed forces and groups with skills that can be used to further exploit natural resources or engage in criminal activities? \n - If skills training and catch-up education are provided as part of short-term reinsertion assistance, do they adequately initiate former members of armed forces and groups in the realities of the lawful economic and social environment, including as it pertains to natural resources? \n - What safeguards can be put in place to prevent former members of armed forces and groups from continuing to engage in any illicit or licit exploitation, control over and\/or trade in natural resources linked to the conflict? \n - What does demobilization offer that membership in armed forces and groups that are controlling or exploiting natural resources does not? Conversely, what does such membership in armed forces and groups offer that demobilization does not? What are the (perceived) benefits of continued engagement in illicit activities? \n - How does demobilization address the specific needs of certain groups such as women and children who may have been recruited and used and\/or been victims of armed forces and groups involved in natural resource exploitation, control or trafficking in conflict?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -216091,7 +216091,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3297, - "Paragraph": "Demobilization: Key questions \\n - What is the risk (if any) that reinsertion assistance will equip former members of armed forces and groups with skills that can be used to further exploit natural resources or engage in criminal activities? \\n - If skills training and catch-up education are provided as part of short-term reinsertion assistance, do they adequately initiate former members of armed forces and groups in the realities of the lawful economic and social environment, including as it pertains to natural resources? \\n - What safeguards can be put in place to prevent former members of armed forces and groups from continuing to engage in any illicit or licit exploitation, control over and\/or trade in natural resources linked to the conflict? \\n - What does demobilization offer that membership in armed forces and groups that are controlling or exploiting natural resources does not? Conversely, what does such membership in armed forces and groups offer that demobilization does not? What are the (perceived) benefits of continued engagement in illicit activities? \\n - How does demobilization address the specific needs of certain groups such as women and children who may have been recruited and used and\/or been victims of armed forces and groups involved in natural resource exploitation, control or trafficking in conflict?", + "Paragraph": "Demobilization: Key questions \n - What is the risk (if any) that reinsertion assistance will equip former members of armed forces and groups with skills that can be used to further exploit natural resources or engage in criminal activities? \n - If skills training and catch-up education are provided as part of short-term reinsertion assistance, do they adequately initiate former members of armed forces and groups in the realities of the lawful economic and social environment, including as it pertains to natural resources? \n - What safeguards can be put in place to prevent former members of armed forces and groups from continuing to engage in any illicit or licit exploitation, control over and\/or trade in natural resources linked to the conflict? \n - What does demobilization offer that membership in armed forces and groups that are controlling or exploiting natural resources does not? Conversely, what does such membership in armed forces and groups offer that demobilization does not? What are the (perceived) benefits of continued engagement in illicit activities? \n - How does demobilization address the specific needs of certain groups such as women and children who may have been recruited and used and\/or been victims of armed forces and groups involved in natural resource exploitation, control or trafficking in conflict?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -216102,7 +216102,7 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Demobilization", "Heading3": "7.2.3 Disposal and management of waste from conflict", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n - How does demobilization address the specific needs of certain groups such as women and children who may have been recruited and used and\/or been victims of armed forces and groups involved in natural resource exploitation, control or trafficking in conflict?", + "Sentence": "\n - How does demobilization address the specific needs of certain groups such as women and children who may have been recruited and used and\/or been victims of armed forces and groups involved in natural resource exploitation, control or trafficking in conflict?", "newParagraph": "demobilization key question n risk reinsertion assistance equip former member armed force group skill used exploit natural resource engage criminal activity n skill training catchup education provided part shortterm reinsertion assistance adequately initiate former member armed force group reality lawful economic social environment including pertains natural resource n safeguard put place prevent former member armed force group continuing engage illicit licit exploitation control andor trade natural resource linked conflict n demobilization offer membership armed force group controlling exploiting natural resource conversely membership armed force group offer demobilization perceived benefit continued engagement illicit activity n demobilization address specific need certain group woman child may recruited used andor victim armed force group involved natural resource exploitation control trafficking conflict", "ProcessedSent": "n demobilization address specific need certain group woman child may recruited used andor victim armed force group involved natural resource exploitation control trafficking conflict", "SentID": 12005 @@ -216847,7 +216847,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3308, - "Paragraph": "Box 5. Considerations to improve reconciliation and dialogue through CBNRM CBNRM can also contribute to social cohesion, dialogue and reconciliation, where these are considered as an explicit outcome of the reintegration programme. To achieve this, DDR practitioners should analyse the following opportunities during the design phase: \\n - Identification of shared natural resources, such as communal lands, water resources, or forests during the assessment phase, including analysis of which groups may be seen as the legitimate authorities and decision-makers over the particular resource. \\n - Establishment of decision-making bodies to manage communal natural resources through participatory and inclusive processes, with the inclusion of women, youth, and 36 marginalized groups. Special attention paid to the safety of women and girls when accessing these resources. \\n - Outreach to indigenous peoples and local communities, or other groups with local knowledge on natural resource management to inform the design of any interventions and integration of these groups for technical assistance or overall support to reintegration efforts. \\n - At the outset of the DDR programme and during the assessment and analysis phases, identify locations or potential \u201chotspots\u201d where natural resources may create tensions between groups, as well as opportunities for environmental cooperation and joint planning to complement and reinforce reconciliation and peacebuilding efforts. \\n - Make dialogue and confidence-building between DDR participants and communities an integral part of environmental projects during reintegration. \\n - Build reintegration options on existing community-based systems and traditions of natural resource management as potential sources for post-conflict peacebuilding, while working to ensure that they are broadly inclusive of different specific needs groups, including women, youth and persons with disabilities.", + "Paragraph": "Box 5. Considerations to improve reconciliation and dialogue through CBNRM CBNRM can also contribute to social cohesion, dialogue and reconciliation, where these are considered as an explicit outcome of the reintegration programme. To achieve this, DDR practitioners should analyse the following opportunities during the design phase: \n - Identification of shared natural resources, such as communal lands, water resources, or forests during the assessment phase, including analysis of which groups may be seen as the legitimate authorities and decision-makers over the particular resource. \n - Establishment of decision-making bodies to manage communal natural resources through participatory and inclusive processes, with the inclusion of women, youth, and 36 marginalized groups. Special attention paid to the safety of women and girls when accessing these resources. \n - Outreach to indigenous peoples and local communities, or other groups with local knowledge on natural resource management to inform the design of any interventions and integration of these groups for technical assistance or overall support to reintegration efforts. \n - At the outset of the DDR programme and during the assessment and analysis phases, identify locations or potential \u201chotspots\u201d where natural resources may create tensions between groups, as well as opportunities for environmental cooperation and joint planning to complement and reinforce reconciliation and peacebuilding efforts. \n - Make dialogue and confidence-building between DDR participants and communities an integral part of environmental projects during reintegration. \n - Build reintegration options on existing community-based systems and traditions of natural resource management as potential sources for post-conflict peacebuilding, while working to ensure that they are broadly inclusive of different specific needs groups, including women, youth and persons with disabilities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -216865,7 +216865,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3308, - "Paragraph": "Box 5. Considerations to improve reconciliation and dialogue through CBNRM CBNRM can also contribute to social cohesion, dialogue and reconciliation, where these are considered as an explicit outcome of the reintegration programme. To achieve this, DDR practitioners should analyse the following opportunities during the design phase: \\n - Identification of shared natural resources, such as communal lands, water resources, or forests during the assessment phase, including analysis of which groups may be seen as the legitimate authorities and decision-makers over the particular resource. \\n - Establishment of decision-making bodies to manage communal natural resources through participatory and inclusive processes, with the inclusion of women, youth, and 36 marginalized groups. Special attention paid to the safety of women and girls when accessing these resources. \\n - Outreach to indigenous peoples and local communities, or other groups with local knowledge on natural resource management to inform the design of any interventions and integration of these groups for technical assistance or overall support to reintegration efforts. \\n - At the outset of the DDR programme and during the assessment and analysis phases, identify locations or potential \u201chotspots\u201d where natural resources may create tensions between groups, as well as opportunities for environmental cooperation and joint planning to complement and reinforce reconciliation and peacebuilding efforts. \\n - Make dialogue and confidence-building between DDR participants and communities an integral part of environmental projects during reintegration. \\n - Build reintegration options on existing community-based systems and traditions of natural resource management as potential sources for post-conflict peacebuilding, while working to ensure that they are broadly inclusive of different specific needs groups, including women, youth and persons with disabilities.", + "Paragraph": "Box 5. Considerations to improve reconciliation and dialogue through CBNRM CBNRM can also contribute to social cohesion, dialogue and reconciliation, where these are considered as an explicit outcome of the reintegration programme. To achieve this, DDR practitioners should analyse the following opportunities during the design phase: \n - Identification of shared natural resources, such as communal lands, water resources, or forests during the assessment phase, including analysis of which groups may be seen as the legitimate authorities and decision-makers over the particular resource. \n - Establishment of decision-making bodies to manage communal natural resources through participatory and inclusive processes, with the inclusion of women, youth, and 36 marginalized groups. Special attention paid to the safety of women and girls when accessing these resources. \n - Outreach to indigenous peoples and local communities, or other groups with local knowledge on natural resource management to inform the design of any interventions and integration of these groups for technical assistance or overall support to reintegration efforts. \n - At the outset of the DDR programme and during the assessment and analysis phases, identify locations or potential \u201chotspots\u201d where natural resources may create tensions between groups, as well as opportunities for environmental cooperation and joint planning to complement and reinforce reconciliation and peacebuilding efforts. \n - Make dialogue and confidence-building between DDR participants and communities an integral part of environmental projects during reintegration. \n - Build reintegration options on existing community-based systems and traditions of natural resource management as potential sources for post-conflict peacebuilding, while working to ensure that they are broadly inclusive of different specific needs groups, including women, youth and persons with disabilities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -216883,7 +216883,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3308, - "Paragraph": "Box 5. Considerations to improve reconciliation and dialogue through CBNRM CBNRM can also contribute to social cohesion, dialogue and reconciliation, where these are considered as an explicit outcome of the reintegration programme. To achieve this, DDR practitioners should analyse the following opportunities during the design phase: \\n - Identification of shared natural resources, such as communal lands, water resources, or forests during the assessment phase, including analysis of which groups may be seen as the legitimate authorities and decision-makers over the particular resource. \\n - Establishment of decision-making bodies to manage communal natural resources through participatory and inclusive processes, with the inclusion of women, youth, and 36 marginalized groups. Special attention paid to the safety of women and girls when accessing these resources. \\n - Outreach to indigenous peoples and local communities, or other groups with local knowledge on natural resource management to inform the design of any interventions and integration of these groups for technical assistance or overall support to reintegration efforts. \\n - At the outset of the DDR programme and during the assessment and analysis phases, identify locations or potential \u201chotspots\u201d where natural resources may create tensions between groups, as well as opportunities for environmental cooperation and joint planning to complement and reinforce reconciliation and peacebuilding efforts. \\n - Make dialogue and confidence-building between DDR participants and communities an integral part of environmental projects during reintegration. \\n - Build reintegration options on existing community-based systems and traditions of natural resource management as potential sources for post-conflict peacebuilding, while working to ensure that they are broadly inclusive of different specific needs groups, including women, youth and persons with disabilities.", + "Paragraph": "Box 5. Considerations to improve reconciliation and dialogue through CBNRM CBNRM can also contribute to social cohesion, dialogue and reconciliation, where these are considered as an explicit outcome of the reintegration programme. To achieve this, DDR practitioners should analyse the following opportunities during the design phase: \n - Identification of shared natural resources, such as communal lands, water resources, or forests during the assessment phase, including analysis of which groups may be seen as the legitimate authorities and decision-makers over the particular resource. \n - Establishment of decision-making bodies to manage communal natural resources through participatory and inclusive processes, with the inclusion of women, youth, and 36 marginalized groups. Special attention paid to the safety of women and girls when accessing these resources. \n - Outreach to indigenous peoples and local communities, or other groups with local knowledge on natural resource management to inform the design of any interventions and integration of these groups for technical assistance or overall support to reintegration efforts. \n - At the outset of the DDR programme and during the assessment and analysis phases, identify locations or potential \u201chotspots\u201d where natural resources may create tensions between groups, as well as opportunities for environmental cooperation and joint planning to complement and reinforce reconciliation and peacebuilding efforts. \n - Make dialogue and confidence-building between DDR participants and communities an integral part of environmental projects during reintegration. \n - Build reintegration options on existing community-based systems and traditions of natural resource management as potential sources for post-conflict peacebuilding, while working to ensure that they are broadly inclusive of different specific needs groups, including women, youth and persons with disabilities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -216894,14 +216894,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3 Reintegration", "Heading3": "7.3.1 Value chain approaches and community-based natural resource management", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "To achieve this, DDR practitioners should analyse the following opportunities during the design phase: \\n - Identification of shared natural resources, such as communal lands, water resources, or forests during the assessment phase, including analysis of which groups may be seen as the legitimate authorities and decision-makers over the particular resource.", + "Sentence": "To achieve this, DDR practitioners should analyse the following opportunities during the design phase: \n - Identification of shared natural resources, such as communal lands, water resources, or forests during the assessment phase, including analysis of which groups may be seen as the legitimate authorities and decision-makers over the particular resource.", "newParagraph": "box 5 consideration improve reconciliation dialogue cbnrm cbnrm also contribute social cohesion dialogue reconciliation considered explicit outcome reintegration programme achieve ddr practitioner analyse following opportunity design phase n identification shared natural resource communal land water resource forest assessment phase including analysis group may seen legitimate authority decisionmakers particular resource n establishment decisionmaking body manage communal natural resource participatory inclusive process inclusion woman youth 36 marginalized group special attention paid safety woman girl accessing resource n outreach indigenous people local community group local knowledge natural resource management inform design intervention integration group technical assistance overall support reintegration effort n outset ddr programme assessment analysis phase identify location potential hotspot natural resource may create tension group well opportunity environmental cooperation joint planning complement reinforce reconciliation peacebuilding effort n make dialogue confidencebuilding ddr participant community integral part environmental project reintegration n build reintegration option existing communitybased system tradition natural resource management potential source postconflict peacebuilding working ensure broadly inclusive different specific need group including woman youth person disability", "ProcessedSent": "achieve ddr practitioner analyse following opportunity design phase n identification shared natural resource communal land water resource forest assessment phase including analysis group may seen legitimate authority decisionmakers particular resource", "SentID": 12049 }, { "ParagraphID": 3308, - "Paragraph": "Box 5. Considerations to improve reconciliation and dialogue through CBNRM CBNRM can also contribute to social cohesion, dialogue and reconciliation, where these are considered as an explicit outcome of the reintegration programme. To achieve this, DDR practitioners should analyse the following opportunities during the design phase: \\n - Identification of shared natural resources, such as communal lands, water resources, or forests during the assessment phase, including analysis of which groups may be seen as the legitimate authorities and decision-makers over the particular resource. \\n - Establishment of decision-making bodies to manage communal natural resources through participatory and inclusive processes, with the inclusion of women, youth, and 36 marginalized groups. Special attention paid to the safety of women and girls when accessing these resources. \\n - Outreach to indigenous peoples and local communities, or other groups with local knowledge on natural resource management to inform the design of any interventions and integration of these groups for technical assistance or overall support to reintegration efforts. \\n - At the outset of the DDR programme and during the assessment and analysis phases, identify locations or potential \u201chotspots\u201d where natural resources may create tensions between groups, as well as opportunities for environmental cooperation and joint planning to complement and reinforce reconciliation and peacebuilding efforts. \\n - Make dialogue and confidence-building between DDR participants and communities an integral part of environmental projects during reintegration. \\n - Build reintegration options on existing community-based systems and traditions of natural resource management as potential sources for post-conflict peacebuilding, while working to ensure that they are broadly inclusive of different specific needs groups, including women, youth and persons with disabilities.", + "Paragraph": "Box 5. Considerations to improve reconciliation and dialogue through CBNRM CBNRM can also contribute to social cohesion, dialogue and reconciliation, where these are considered as an explicit outcome of the reintegration programme. To achieve this, DDR practitioners should analyse the following opportunities during the design phase: \n - Identification of shared natural resources, such as communal lands, water resources, or forests during the assessment phase, including analysis of which groups may be seen as the legitimate authorities and decision-makers over the particular resource. \n - Establishment of decision-making bodies to manage communal natural resources through participatory and inclusive processes, with the inclusion of women, youth, and 36 marginalized groups. Special attention paid to the safety of women and girls when accessing these resources. \n - Outreach to indigenous peoples and local communities, or other groups with local knowledge on natural resource management to inform the design of any interventions and integration of these groups for technical assistance or overall support to reintegration efforts. \n - At the outset of the DDR programme and during the assessment and analysis phases, identify locations or potential \u201chotspots\u201d where natural resources may create tensions between groups, as well as opportunities for environmental cooperation and joint planning to complement and reinforce reconciliation and peacebuilding efforts. \n - Make dialogue and confidence-building between DDR participants and communities an integral part of environmental projects during reintegration. \n - Build reintegration options on existing community-based systems and traditions of natural resource management as potential sources for post-conflict peacebuilding, while working to ensure that they are broadly inclusive of different specific needs groups, including women, youth and persons with disabilities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -216912,14 +216912,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3 Reintegration", "Heading3": "7.3.1 Value chain approaches and community-based natural resource management", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n - Establishment of decision-making bodies to manage communal natural resources through participatory and inclusive processes, with the inclusion of women, youth, and 36 marginalized groups.", + "Sentence": "\n - Establishment of decision-making bodies to manage communal natural resources through participatory and inclusive processes, with the inclusion of women, youth, and 36 marginalized groups.", "newParagraph": "box 5 consideration improve reconciliation dialogue cbnrm cbnrm also contribute social cohesion dialogue reconciliation considered explicit outcome reintegration programme achieve ddr practitioner analyse following opportunity design phase n identification shared natural resource communal land water resource forest assessment phase including analysis group may seen legitimate authority decisionmakers particular resource n establishment decisionmaking body manage communal natural resource participatory inclusive process inclusion woman youth 36 marginalized group special attention paid safety woman girl accessing resource n outreach indigenous people local community group local knowledge natural resource management inform design intervention integration group technical assistance overall support reintegration effort n outset ddr programme assessment analysis phase identify location potential hotspot natural resource may create tension group well opportunity environmental cooperation joint planning complement reinforce reconciliation peacebuilding effort n make dialogue confidencebuilding ddr participant community integral part environmental project reintegration n build reintegration option existing communitybased system tradition natural resource management potential source postconflict peacebuilding working ensure broadly inclusive different specific need group including woman youth person disability", "ProcessedSent": "n establishment decisionmaking body manage communal natural resource participatory inclusive process inclusion woman youth 36 marginalized group", "SentID": 12050 }, { "ParagraphID": 3308, - "Paragraph": "Box 5. Considerations to improve reconciliation and dialogue through CBNRM CBNRM can also contribute to social cohesion, dialogue and reconciliation, where these are considered as an explicit outcome of the reintegration programme. To achieve this, DDR practitioners should analyse the following opportunities during the design phase: \\n - Identification of shared natural resources, such as communal lands, water resources, or forests during the assessment phase, including analysis of which groups may be seen as the legitimate authorities and decision-makers over the particular resource. \\n - Establishment of decision-making bodies to manage communal natural resources through participatory and inclusive processes, with the inclusion of women, youth, and 36 marginalized groups. Special attention paid to the safety of women and girls when accessing these resources. \\n - Outreach to indigenous peoples and local communities, or other groups with local knowledge on natural resource management to inform the design of any interventions and integration of these groups for technical assistance or overall support to reintegration efforts. \\n - At the outset of the DDR programme and during the assessment and analysis phases, identify locations or potential \u201chotspots\u201d where natural resources may create tensions between groups, as well as opportunities for environmental cooperation and joint planning to complement and reinforce reconciliation and peacebuilding efforts. \\n - Make dialogue and confidence-building between DDR participants and communities an integral part of environmental projects during reintegration. \\n - Build reintegration options on existing community-based systems and traditions of natural resource management as potential sources for post-conflict peacebuilding, while working to ensure that they are broadly inclusive of different specific needs groups, including women, youth and persons with disabilities.", + "Paragraph": "Box 5. Considerations to improve reconciliation and dialogue through CBNRM CBNRM can also contribute to social cohesion, dialogue and reconciliation, where these are considered as an explicit outcome of the reintegration programme. To achieve this, DDR practitioners should analyse the following opportunities during the design phase: \n - Identification of shared natural resources, such as communal lands, water resources, or forests during the assessment phase, including analysis of which groups may be seen as the legitimate authorities and decision-makers over the particular resource. \n - Establishment of decision-making bodies to manage communal natural resources through participatory and inclusive processes, with the inclusion of women, youth, and 36 marginalized groups. Special attention paid to the safety of women and girls when accessing these resources. \n - Outreach to indigenous peoples and local communities, or other groups with local knowledge on natural resource management to inform the design of any interventions and integration of these groups for technical assistance or overall support to reintegration efforts. \n - At the outset of the DDR programme and during the assessment and analysis phases, identify locations or potential \u201chotspots\u201d where natural resources may create tensions between groups, as well as opportunities for environmental cooperation and joint planning to complement and reinforce reconciliation and peacebuilding efforts. \n - Make dialogue and confidence-building between DDR participants and communities an integral part of environmental projects during reintegration. \n - Build reintegration options on existing community-based systems and traditions of natural resource management as potential sources for post-conflict peacebuilding, while working to ensure that they are broadly inclusive of different specific needs groups, including women, youth and persons with disabilities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -216937,7 +216937,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3308, - "Paragraph": "Box 5. Considerations to improve reconciliation and dialogue through CBNRM CBNRM can also contribute to social cohesion, dialogue and reconciliation, where these are considered as an explicit outcome of the reintegration programme. To achieve this, DDR practitioners should analyse the following opportunities during the design phase: \\n - Identification of shared natural resources, such as communal lands, water resources, or forests during the assessment phase, including analysis of which groups may be seen as the legitimate authorities and decision-makers over the particular resource. \\n - Establishment of decision-making bodies to manage communal natural resources through participatory and inclusive processes, with the inclusion of women, youth, and 36 marginalized groups. Special attention paid to the safety of women and girls when accessing these resources. \\n - Outreach to indigenous peoples and local communities, or other groups with local knowledge on natural resource management to inform the design of any interventions and integration of these groups for technical assistance or overall support to reintegration efforts. \\n - At the outset of the DDR programme and during the assessment and analysis phases, identify locations or potential \u201chotspots\u201d where natural resources may create tensions between groups, as well as opportunities for environmental cooperation and joint planning to complement and reinforce reconciliation and peacebuilding efforts. \\n - Make dialogue and confidence-building between DDR participants and communities an integral part of environmental projects during reintegration. \\n - Build reintegration options on existing community-based systems and traditions of natural resource management as potential sources for post-conflict peacebuilding, while working to ensure that they are broadly inclusive of different specific needs groups, including women, youth and persons with disabilities.", + "Paragraph": "Box 5. Considerations to improve reconciliation and dialogue through CBNRM CBNRM can also contribute to social cohesion, dialogue and reconciliation, where these are considered as an explicit outcome of the reintegration programme. To achieve this, DDR practitioners should analyse the following opportunities during the design phase: \n - Identification of shared natural resources, such as communal lands, water resources, or forests during the assessment phase, including analysis of which groups may be seen as the legitimate authorities and decision-makers over the particular resource. \n - Establishment of decision-making bodies to manage communal natural resources through participatory and inclusive processes, with the inclusion of women, youth, and 36 marginalized groups. Special attention paid to the safety of women and girls when accessing these resources. \n - Outreach to indigenous peoples and local communities, or other groups with local knowledge on natural resource management to inform the design of any interventions and integration of these groups for technical assistance or overall support to reintegration efforts. \n - At the outset of the DDR programme and during the assessment and analysis phases, identify locations or potential \u201chotspots\u201d where natural resources may create tensions between groups, as well as opportunities for environmental cooperation and joint planning to complement and reinforce reconciliation and peacebuilding efforts. \n - Make dialogue and confidence-building between DDR participants and communities an integral part of environmental projects during reintegration. \n - Build reintegration options on existing community-based systems and traditions of natural resource management as potential sources for post-conflict peacebuilding, while working to ensure that they are broadly inclusive of different specific needs groups, including women, youth and persons with disabilities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -216948,14 +216948,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3 Reintegration", "Heading3": "7.3.1 Value chain approaches and community-based natural resource management", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n - Outreach to indigenous peoples and local communities, or other groups with local knowledge on natural resource management to inform the design of any interventions and integration of these groups for technical assistance or overall support to reintegration efforts.", + "Sentence": "\n - Outreach to indigenous peoples and local communities, or other groups with local knowledge on natural resource management to inform the design of any interventions and integration of these groups for technical assistance or overall support to reintegration efforts.", "newParagraph": "box 5 consideration improve reconciliation dialogue cbnrm cbnrm also contribute social cohesion dialogue reconciliation considered explicit outcome reintegration programme achieve ddr practitioner analyse following opportunity design phase n identification shared natural resource communal land water resource forest assessment phase including analysis group may seen legitimate authority decisionmakers particular resource n establishment decisionmaking body manage communal natural resource participatory inclusive process inclusion woman youth 36 marginalized group special attention paid safety woman girl accessing resource n outreach indigenous people local community group local knowledge natural resource management inform design intervention integration group technical assistance overall support reintegration effort n outset ddr programme assessment analysis phase identify location potential hotspot natural resource may create tension group well opportunity environmental cooperation joint planning complement reinforce reconciliation peacebuilding effort n make dialogue confidencebuilding ddr participant community integral part environmental project reintegration n build reintegration option existing communitybased system tradition natural resource management potential source postconflict peacebuilding working ensure broadly inclusive different specific need group including woman youth person disability", "ProcessedSent": "n outreach indigenous people local community group local knowledge natural resource management inform design intervention integration group technical assistance overall support reintegration effort", "SentID": 12052 }, { "ParagraphID": 3308, - "Paragraph": "Box 5. Considerations to improve reconciliation and dialogue through CBNRM CBNRM can also contribute to social cohesion, dialogue and reconciliation, where these are considered as an explicit outcome of the reintegration programme. To achieve this, DDR practitioners should analyse the following opportunities during the design phase: \\n - Identification of shared natural resources, such as communal lands, water resources, or forests during the assessment phase, including analysis of which groups may be seen as the legitimate authorities and decision-makers over the particular resource. \\n - Establishment of decision-making bodies to manage communal natural resources through participatory and inclusive processes, with the inclusion of women, youth, and 36 marginalized groups. Special attention paid to the safety of women and girls when accessing these resources. \\n - Outreach to indigenous peoples and local communities, or other groups with local knowledge on natural resource management to inform the design of any interventions and integration of these groups for technical assistance or overall support to reintegration efforts. \\n - At the outset of the DDR programme and during the assessment and analysis phases, identify locations or potential \u201chotspots\u201d where natural resources may create tensions between groups, as well as opportunities for environmental cooperation and joint planning to complement and reinforce reconciliation and peacebuilding efforts. \\n - Make dialogue and confidence-building between DDR participants and communities an integral part of environmental projects during reintegration. \\n - Build reintegration options on existing community-based systems and traditions of natural resource management as potential sources for post-conflict peacebuilding, while working to ensure that they are broadly inclusive of different specific needs groups, including women, youth and persons with disabilities.", + "Paragraph": "Box 5. Considerations to improve reconciliation and dialogue through CBNRM CBNRM can also contribute to social cohesion, dialogue and reconciliation, where these are considered as an explicit outcome of the reintegration programme. To achieve this, DDR practitioners should analyse the following opportunities during the design phase: \n - Identification of shared natural resources, such as communal lands, water resources, or forests during the assessment phase, including analysis of which groups may be seen as the legitimate authorities and decision-makers over the particular resource. \n - Establishment of decision-making bodies to manage communal natural resources through participatory and inclusive processes, with the inclusion of women, youth, and 36 marginalized groups. Special attention paid to the safety of women and girls when accessing these resources. \n - Outreach to indigenous peoples and local communities, or other groups with local knowledge on natural resource management to inform the design of any interventions and integration of these groups for technical assistance or overall support to reintegration efforts. \n - At the outset of the DDR programme and during the assessment and analysis phases, identify locations or potential \u201chotspots\u201d where natural resources may create tensions between groups, as well as opportunities for environmental cooperation and joint planning to complement and reinforce reconciliation and peacebuilding efforts. \n - Make dialogue and confidence-building between DDR participants and communities an integral part of environmental projects during reintegration. \n - Build reintegration options on existing community-based systems and traditions of natural resource management as potential sources for post-conflict peacebuilding, while working to ensure that they are broadly inclusive of different specific needs groups, including women, youth and persons with disabilities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -216966,14 +216966,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3 Reintegration", "Heading3": "7.3.1 Value chain approaches and community-based natural resource management", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n - At the outset of the DDR programme and during the assessment and analysis phases, identify locations or potential \u201chotspots\u201d where natural resources may create tensions between groups, as well as opportunities for environmental cooperation and joint planning to complement and reinforce reconciliation and peacebuilding efforts.", + "Sentence": "\n - At the outset of the DDR programme and during the assessment and analysis phases, identify locations or potential \u201chotspots\u201d where natural resources may create tensions between groups, as well as opportunities for environmental cooperation and joint planning to complement and reinforce reconciliation and peacebuilding efforts.", "newParagraph": "box 5 consideration improve reconciliation dialogue cbnrm cbnrm also contribute social cohesion dialogue reconciliation considered explicit outcome reintegration programme achieve ddr practitioner analyse following opportunity design phase n identification shared natural resource communal land water resource forest assessment phase including analysis group may seen legitimate authority decisionmakers particular resource n establishment decisionmaking body manage communal natural resource participatory inclusive process inclusion woman youth 36 marginalized group special attention paid safety woman girl accessing resource n outreach indigenous people local community group local knowledge natural resource management inform design intervention integration group technical assistance overall support reintegration effort n outset ddr programme assessment analysis phase identify location potential hotspot natural resource may create tension group well opportunity environmental cooperation joint planning complement reinforce reconciliation peacebuilding effort n make dialogue confidencebuilding ddr participant community integral part environmental project reintegration n build reintegration option existing communitybased system tradition natural resource management potential source postconflict peacebuilding working ensure broadly inclusive different specific need group including woman youth person disability", "ProcessedSent": "n outset ddr programme assessment analysis phase identify location potential hotspot natural resource may create tension group well opportunity environmental cooperation joint planning complement reinforce reconciliation peacebuilding effort", "SentID": 12053 }, { "ParagraphID": 3308, - "Paragraph": "Box 5. Considerations to improve reconciliation and dialogue through CBNRM CBNRM can also contribute to social cohesion, dialogue and reconciliation, where these are considered as an explicit outcome of the reintegration programme. To achieve this, DDR practitioners should analyse the following opportunities during the design phase: \\n - Identification of shared natural resources, such as communal lands, water resources, or forests during the assessment phase, including analysis of which groups may be seen as the legitimate authorities and decision-makers over the particular resource. \\n - Establishment of decision-making bodies to manage communal natural resources through participatory and inclusive processes, with the inclusion of women, youth, and 36 marginalized groups. Special attention paid to the safety of women and girls when accessing these resources. \\n - Outreach to indigenous peoples and local communities, or other groups with local knowledge on natural resource management to inform the design of any interventions and integration of these groups for technical assistance or overall support to reintegration efforts. \\n - At the outset of the DDR programme and during the assessment and analysis phases, identify locations or potential \u201chotspots\u201d where natural resources may create tensions between groups, as well as opportunities for environmental cooperation and joint planning to complement and reinforce reconciliation and peacebuilding efforts. \\n - Make dialogue and confidence-building between DDR participants and communities an integral part of environmental projects during reintegration. \\n - Build reintegration options on existing community-based systems and traditions of natural resource management as potential sources for post-conflict peacebuilding, while working to ensure that they are broadly inclusive of different specific needs groups, including women, youth and persons with disabilities.", + "Paragraph": "Box 5. Considerations to improve reconciliation and dialogue through CBNRM CBNRM can also contribute to social cohesion, dialogue and reconciliation, where these are considered as an explicit outcome of the reintegration programme. To achieve this, DDR practitioners should analyse the following opportunities during the design phase: \n - Identification of shared natural resources, such as communal lands, water resources, or forests during the assessment phase, including analysis of which groups may be seen as the legitimate authorities and decision-makers over the particular resource. \n - Establishment of decision-making bodies to manage communal natural resources through participatory and inclusive processes, with the inclusion of women, youth, and 36 marginalized groups. Special attention paid to the safety of women and girls when accessing these resources. \n - Outreach to indigenous peoples and local communities, or other groups with local knowledge on natural resource management to inform the design of any interventions and integration of these groups for technical assistance or overall support to reintegration efforts. \n - At the outset of the DDR programme and during the assessment and analysis phases, identify locations or potential \u201chotspots\u201d where natural resources may create tensions between groups, as well as opportunities for environmental cooperation and joint planning to complement and reinforce reconciliation and peacebuilding efforts. \n - Make dialogue and confidence-building between DDR participants and communities an integral part of environmental projects during reintegration. \n - Build reintegration options on existing community-based systems and traditions of natural resource management as potential sources for post-conflict peacebuilding, while working to ensure that they are broadly inclusive of different specific needs groups, including women, youth and persons with disabilities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -216984,14 +216984,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3 Reintegration", "Heading3": "7.3.1 Value chain approaches and community-based natural resource management", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n - Make dialogue and confidence-building between DDR participants and communities an integral part of environmental projects during reintegration.", + "Sentence": "\n - Make dialogue and confidence-building between DDR participants and communities an integral part of environmental projects during reintegration.", "newParagraph": "box 5 consideration improve reconciliation dialogue cbnrm cbnrm also contribute social cohesion dialogue reconciliation considered explicit outcome reintegration programme achieve ddr practitioner analyse following opportunity design phase n identification shared natural resource communal land water resource forest assessment phase including analysis group may seen legitimate authority decisionmakers particular resource n establishment decisionmaking body manage communal natural resource participatory inclusive process inclusion woman youth 36 marginalized group special attention paid safety woman girl accessing resource n outreach indigenous people local community group local knowledge natural resource management inform design intervention integration group technical assistance overall support reintegration effort n outset ddr programme assessment analysis phase identify location potential hotspot natural resource may create tension group well opportunity environmental cooperation joint planning complement reinforce reconciliation peacebuilding effort n make dialogue confidencebuilding ddr participant community integral part environmental project reintegration n build reintegration option existing communitybased system tradition natural resource management potential source postconflict peacebuilding working ensure broadly inclusive different specific need group including woman youth person disability", "ProcessedSent": "n make dialogue confidencebuilding ddr participant community integral part environmental project reintegration", "SentID": 12054 }, { "ParagraphID": 3308, - "Paragraph": "Box 5. Considerations to improve reconciliation and dialogue through CBNRM CBNRM can also contribute to social cohesion, dialogue and reconciliation, where these are considered as an explicit outcome of the reintegration programme. To achieve this, DDR practitioners should analyse the following opportunities during the design phase: \\n - Identification of shared natural resources, such as communal lands, water resources, or forests during the assessment phase, including analysis of which groups may be seen as the legitimate authorities and decision-makers over the particular resource. \\n - Establishment of decision-making bodies to manage communal natural resources through participatory and inclusive processes, with the inclusion of women, youth, and 36 marginalized groups. Special attention paid to the safety of women and girls when accessing these resources. \\n - Outreach to indigenous peoples and local communities, or other groups with local knowledge on natural resource management to inform the design of any interventions and integration of these groups for technical assistance or overall support to reintegration efforts. \\n - At the outset of the DDR programme and during the assessment and analysis phases, identify locations or potential \u201chotspots\u201d where natural resources may create tensions between groups, as well as opportunities for environmental cooperation and joint planning to complement and reinforce reconciliation and peacebuilding efforts. \\n - Make dialogue and confidence-building between DDR participants and communities an integral part of environmental projects during reintegration. \\n - Build reintegration options on existing community-based systems and traditions of natural resource management as potential sources for post-conflict peacebuilding, while working to ensure that they are broadly inclusive of different specific needs groups, including women, youth and persons with disabilities.", + "Paragraph": "Box 5. Considerations to improve reconciliation and dialogue through CBNRM CBNRM can also contribute to social cohesion, dialogue and reconciliation, where these are considered as an explicit outcome of the reintegration programme. To achieve this, DDR practitioners should analyse the following opportunities during the design phase: \n - Identification of shared natural resources, such as communal lands, water resources, or forests during the assessment phase, including analysis of which groups may be seen as the legitimate authorities and decision-makers over the particular resource. \n - Establishment of decision-making bodies to manage communal natural resources through participatory and inclusive processes, with the inclusion of women, youth, and 36 marginalized groups. Special attention paid to the safety of women and girls when accessing these resources. \n - Outreach to indigenous peoples and local communities, or other groups with local knowledge on natural resource management to inform the design of any interventions and integration of these groups for technical assistance or overall support to reintegration efforts. \n - At the outset of the DDR programme and during the assessment and analysis phases, identify locations or potential \u201chotspots\u201d where natural resources may create tensions between groups, as well as opportunities for environmental cooperation and joint planning to complement and reinforce reconciliation and peacebuilding efforts. \n - Make dialogue and confidence-building between DDR participants and communities an integral part of environmental projects during reintegration. \n - Build reintegration options on existing community-based systems and traditions of natural resource management as potential sources for post-conflict peacebuilding, while working to ensure that they are broadly inclusive of different specific needs groups, including women, youth and persons with disabilities.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -217002,7 +217002,7 @@ "Heading2": "7.3 Reintegration", "Heading3": "7.3.1 Value chain approaches and community-based natural resource management", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n - Build reintegration options on existing community-based systems and traditions of natural resource management as potential sources for post-conflict peacebuilding, while working to ensure that they are broadly inclusive of different specific needs groups, including women, youth and persons with disabilities.", + "Sentence": "\n - Build reintegration options on existing community-based systems and traditions of natural resource management as potential sources for post-conflict peacebuilding, while working to ensure that they are broadly inclusive of different specific needs groups, including women, youth and persons with disabilities.", "newParagraph": "box 5 consideration improve reconciliation dialogue cbnrm cbnrm also contribute social cohesion dialogue reconciliation considered explicit outcome reintegration programme achieve ddr practitioner analyse following opportunity design phase n identification shared natural resource communal land water resource forest assessment phase including analysis group may seen legitimate authority decisionmakers particular resource n establishment decisionmaking body manage communal natural resource participatory inclusive process inclusion woman youth 36 marginalized group special attention paid safety woman girl accessing resource n outreach indigenous people local community group local knowledge natural resource management inform design intervention integration group technical assistance overall support reintegration effort n outset ddr programme assessment analysis phase identify location potential hotspot natural resource may create tension group well opportunity environmental cooperation joint planning complement reinforce reconciliation peacebuilding effort n make dialogue confidencebuilding ddr participant community integral part environmental project reintegration n build reintegration option existing communitybased system tradition natural resource management potential source postconflict peacebuilding working ensure broadly inclusive different specific need group including woman youth person disability", "ProcessedSent": "n build reintegration option existing communitybased system tradition natural resource management potential source postconflict peacebuilding working ensure broadly inclusive different specific need group including woman youth person disability", "SentID": 12055 @@ -218125,7 +218125,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3326, - "Paragraph": "Reintegration: Key questions \\n- Has data been collected and analysed on natural resource management, including formal and informal, licit and illicit activities, through relevant assessments, to inform reintegration options? \\n- What opportunities exist for reintegration activities in natural resource management to address the root causes and grievances that led to conflict? \\n- Have the risks and opportunities associated with natural resource management as relevant to armed forces and groups or organized criminal groups been analysed (through conflict analysis) when determining effective approaches to reintegration that will avoid the risk of future conflict? \\n- Have the cultural and social dimensions of natural resources in livelihoods and employment, including the gender dimensions of resource access and use, been addressed? \\n- Have all relevant actors in the government, civil society, NGOs, international organizations and local and international private sector entities been engaged and consulted? \\n- Have a selection of environmental and natural resource indicators to monitor DDR and any potential destabilizing trends been included? \\n- Have the impact of government proposals and concession negotiations for extractive industries and any risks for security and durable peace been analysed and considered?", + "Paragraph": "Reintegration: Key questions \n- Has data been collected and analysed on natural resource management, including formal and informal, licit and illicit activities, through relevant assessments, to inform reintegration options? \n- What opportunities exist for reintegration activities in natural resource management to address the root causes and grievances that led to conflict? \n- Have the risks and opportunities associated with natural resource management as relevant to armed forces and groups or organized criminal groups been analysed (through conflict analysis) when determining effective approaches to reintegration that will avoid the risk of future conflict? \n- Have the cultural and social dimensions of natural resources in livelihoods and employment, including the gender dimensions of resource access and use, been addressed? \n- Have all relevant actors in the government, civil society, NGOs, international organizations and local and international private sector entities been engaged and consulted? \n- Have a selection of environmental and natural resource indicators to monitor DDR and any potential destabilizing trends been included? \n- Have the impact of government proposals and concession negotiations for extractive industries and any risks for security and durable peace been analysed and considered?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -218136,14 +218136,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3 Reintegration", "Heading3": "7.3.8 Reintegration support and waste management", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Reintegration: Key questions \\n- Has data been collected and analysed on natural resource management, including formal and informal, licit and illicit activities, through relevant assessments, to inform reintegration options?", + "Sentence": "Reintegration: Key questions \n- Has data been collected and analysed on natural resource management, including formal and informal, licit and illicit activities, through relevant assessments, to inform reintegration options?", "newParagraph": "reintegration key question n data collected analysed natural resource management including formal informal licit illicit activity relevant assessment inform reintegration option n opportunity exist reintegration activity natural resource management address root cause grievance led conflict n risk opportunity associated natural resource management relevant armed force group organized criminal group analysed conflict analysis determining effective approach reintegration avoid risk future conflict n cultural social dimension natural resource livelihood employment including gender dimension resource access use addressed n relevant actor government civil society ngo international organization local international private sector entity engaged consulted n selection environmental natural resource indicator monitor ddr potential destabilizing trend included n impact government proposal concession negotiation extractive industry risk security durable peace analysed considered", "ProcessedSent": "reintegration key question n data collected analysed natural resource management including formal informal licit illicit activity relevant assessment inform reintegration option", "SentID": 12118 }, { "ParagraphID": 3326, - "Paragraph": "Reintegration: Key questions \\n- Has data been collected and analysed on natural resource management, including formal and informal, licit and illicit activities, through relevant assessments, to inform reintegration options? \\n- What opportunities exist for reintegration activities in natural resource management to address the root causes and grievances that led to conflict? \\n- Have the risks and opportunities associated with natural resource management as relevant to armed forces and groups or organized criminal groups been analysed (through conflict analysis) when determining effective approaches to reintegration that will avoid the risk of future conflict? \\n- Have the cultural and social dimensions of natural resources in livelihoods and employment, including the gender dimensions of resource access and use, been addressed? \\n- Have all relevant actors in the government, civil society, NGOs, international organizations and local and international private sector entities been engaged and consulted? \\n- Have a selection of environmental and natural resource indicators to monitor DDR and any potential destabilizing trends been included? \\n- Have the impact of government proposals and concession negotiations for extractive industries and any risks for security and durable peace been analysed and considered?", + "Paragraph": "Reintegration: Key questions \n- Has data been collected and analysed on natural resource management, including formal and informal, licit and illicit activities, through relevant assessments, to inform reintegration options? \n- What opportunities exist for reintegration activities in natural resource management to address the root causes and grievances that led to conflict? \n- Have the risks and opportunities associated with natural resource management as relevant to armed forces and groups or organized criminal groups been analysed (through conflict analysis) when determining effective approaches to reintegration that will avoid the risk of future conflict? \n- Have the cultural and social dimensions of natural resources in livelihoods and employment, including the gender dimensions of resource access and use, been addressed? \n- Have all relevant actors in the government, civil society, NGOs, international organizations and local and international private sector entities been engaged and consulted? \n- Have a selection of environmental and natural resource indicators to monitor DDR and any potential destabilizing trends been included? \n- Have the impact of government proposals and concession negotiations for extractive industries and any risks for security and durable peace been analysed and considered?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -218154,14 +218154,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3 Reintegration", "Heading3": "7.3.8 Reintegration support and waste management", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n- What opportunities exist for reintegration activities in natural resource management to address the root causes and grievances that led to conflict?", + "Sentence": "\n- What opportunities exist for reintegration activities in natural resource management to address the root causes and grievances that led to conflict?", "newParagraph": "reintegration key question n data collected analysed natural resource management including formal informal licit illicit activity relevant assessment inform reintegration option n opportunity exist reintegration activity natural resource management address root cause grievance led conflict n risk opportunity associated natural resource management relevant armed force group organized criminal group analysed conflict analysis determining effective approach reintegration avoid risk future conflict n cultural social dimension natural resource livelihood employment including gender dimension resource access use addressed n relevant actor government civil society ngo international organization local international private sector entity engaged consulted n selection environmental natural resource indicator monitor ddr potential destabilizing trend included n impact government proposal concession negotiation extractive industry risk security durable peace analysed considered", "ProcessedSent": "n opportunity exist reintegration activity natural resource management address root cause grievance led conflict", "SentID": 12119 }, { "ParagraphID": 3326, - "Paragraph": "Reintegration: Key questions \\n- Has data been collected and analysed on natural resource management, including formal and informal, licit and illicit activities, through relevant assessments, to inform reintegration options? \\n- What opportunities exist for reintegration activities in natural resource management to address the root causes and grievances that led to conflict? \\n- Have the risks and opportunities associated with natural resource management as relevant to armed forces and groups or organized criminal groups been analysed (through conflict analysis) when determining effective approaches to reintegration that will avoid the risk of future conflict? \\n- Have the cultural and social dimensions of natural resources in livelihoods and employment, including the gender dimensions of resource access and use, been addressed? \\n- Have all relevant actors in the government, civil society, NGOs, international organizations and local and international private sector entities been engaged and consulted? \\n- Have a selection of environmental and natural resource indicators to monitor DDR and any potential destabilizing trends been included? \\n- Have the impact of government proposals and concession negotiations for extractive industries and any risks for security and durable peace been analysed and considered?", + "Paragraph": "Reintegration: Key questions \n- Has data been collected and analysed on natural resource management, including formal and informal, licit and illicit activities, through relevant assessments, to inform reintegration options? \n- What opportunities exist for reintegration activities in natural resource management to address the root causes and grievances that led to conflict? \n- Have the risks and opportunities associated with natural resource management as relevant to armed forces and groups or organized criminal groups been analysed (through conflict analysis) when determining effective approaches to reintegration that will avoid the risk of future conflict? \n- Have the cultural and social dimensions of natural resources in livelihoods and employment, including the gender dimensions of resource access and use, been addressed? \n- Have all relevant actors in the government, civil society, NGOs, international organizations and local and international private sector entities been engaged and consulted? \n- Have a selection of environmental and natural resource indicators to monitor DDR and any potential destabilizing trends been included? \n- Have the impact of government proposals and concession negotiations for extractive industries and any risks for security and durable peace been analysed and considered?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -218172,14 +218172,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3 Reintegration", "Heading3": "7.3.8 Reintegration support and waste management", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n- Have the risks and opportunities associated with natural resource management as relevant to armed forces and groups or organized criminal groups been analysed (through conflict analysis) when determining effective approaches to reintegration that will avoid the risk of future conflict?", + "Sentence": "\n- Have the risks and opportunities associated with natural resource management as relevant to armed forces and groups or organized criminal groups been analysed (through conflict analysis) when determining effective approaches to reintegration that will avoid the risk of future conflict?", "newParagraph": "reintegration key question n data collected analysed natural resource management including formal informal licit illicit activity relevant assessment inform reintegration option n opportunity exist reintegration activity natural resource management address root cause grievance led conflict n risk opportunity associated natural resource management relevant armed force group organized criminal group analysed conflict analysis determining effective approach reintegration avoid risk future conflict n cultural social dimension natural resource livelihood employment including gender dimension resource access use addressed n relevant actor government civil society ngo international organization local international private sector entity engaged consulted n selection environmental natural resource indicator monitor ddr potential destabilizing trend included n impact government proposal concession negotiation extractive industry risk security durable peace analysed considered", "ProcessedSent": "n risk opportunity associated natural resource management relevant armed force group organized criminal group analysed conflict analysis determining effective approach reintegration avoid risk future conflict", "SentID": 12120 }, { "ParagraphID": 3326, - "Paragraph": "Reintegration: Key questions \\n- Has data been collected and analysed on natural resource management, including formal and informal, licit and illicit activities, through relevant assessments, to inform reintegration options? \\n- What opportunities exist for reintegration activities in natural resource management to address the root causes and grievances that led to conflict? \\n- Have the risks and opportunities associated with natural resource management as relevant to armed forces and groups or organized criminal groups been analysed (through conflict analysis) when determining effective approaches to reintegration that will avoid the risk of future conflict? \\n- Have the cultural and social dimensions of natural resources in livelihoods and employment, including the gender dimensions of resource access and use, been addressed? \\n- Have all relevant actors in the government, civil society, NGOs, international organizations and local and international private sector entities been engaged and consulted? \\n- Have a selection of environmental and natural resource indicators to monitor DDR and any potential destabilizing trends been included? \\n- Have the impact of government proposals and concession negotiations for extractive industries and any risks for security and durable peace been analysed and considered?", + "Paragraph": "Reintegration: Key questions \n- Has data been collected and analysed on natural resource management, including formal and informal, licit and illicit activities, through relevant assessments, to inform reintegration options? \n- What opportunities exist for reintegration activities in natural resource management to address the root causes and grievances that led to conflict? \n- Have the risks and opportunities associated with natural resource management as relevant to armed forces and groups or organized criminal groups been analysed (through conflict analysis) when determining effective approaches to reintegration that will avoid the risk of future conflict? \n- Have the cultural and social dimensions of natural resources in livelihoods and employment, including the gender dimensions of resource access and use, been addressed? \n- Have all relevant actors in the government, civil society, NGOs, international organizations and local and international private sector entities been engaged and consulted? \n- Have a selection of environmental and natural resource indicators to monitor DDR and any potential destabilizing trends been included? \n- Have the impact of government proposals and concession negotiations for extractive industries and any risks for security and durable peace been analysed and considered?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -218190,14 +218190,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3 Reintegration", "Heading3": "7.3.8 Reintegration support and waste management", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n- Have the cultural and social dimensions of natural resources in livelihoods and employment, including the gender dimensions of resource access and use, been addressed?", + "Sentence": "\n- Have the cultural and social dimensions of natural resources in livelihoods and employment, including the gender dimensions of resource access and use, been addressed?", "newParagraph": "reintegration key question n data collected analysed natural resource management including formal informal licit illicit activity relevant assessment inform reintegration option n opportunity exist reintegration activity natural resource management address root cause grievance led conflict n risk opportunity associated natural resource management relevant armed force group organized criminal group analysed conflict analysis determining effective approach reintegration avoid risk future conflict n cultural social dimension natural resource livelihood employment including gender dimension resource access use addressed n relevant actor government civil society ngo international organization local international private sector entity engaged consulted n selection environmental natural resource indicator monitor ddr potential destabilizing trend included n impact government proposal concession negotiation extractive industry risk security durable peace analysed considered", "ProcessedSent": "n cultural social dimension natural resource livelihood employment including gender dimension resource access use addressed", "SentID": 12121 }, { "ParagraphID": 3326, - "Paragraph": "Reintegration: Key questions \\n- Has data been collected and analysed on natural resource management, including formal and informal, licit and illicit activities, through relevant assessments, to inform reintegration options? \\n- What opportunities exist for reintegration activities in natural resource management to address the root causes and grievances that led to conflict? \\n- Have the risks and opportunities associated with natural resource management as relevant to armed forces and groups or organized criminal groups been analysed (through conflict analysis) when determining effective approaches to reintegration that will avoid the risk of future conflict? \\n- Have the cultural and social dimensions of natural resources in livelihoods and employment, including the gender dimensions of resource access and use, been addressed? \\n- Have all relevant actors in the government, civil society, NGOs, international organizations and local and international private sector entities been engaged and consulted? \\n- Have a selection of environmental and natural resource indicators to monitor DDR and any potential destabilizing trends been included? \\n- Have the impact of government proposals and concession negotiations for extractive industries and any risks for security and durable peace been analysed and considered?", + "Paragraph": "Reintegration: Key questions \n- Has data been collected and analysed on natural resource management, including formal and informal, licit and illicit activities, through relevant assessments, to inform reintegration options? \n- What opportunities exist for reintegration activities in natural resource management to address the root causes and grievances that led to conflict? \n- Have the risks and opportunities associated with natural resource management as relevant to armed forces and groups or organized criminal groups been analysed (through conflict analysis) when determining effective approaches to reintegration that will avoid the risk of future conflict? \n- Have the cultural and social dimensions of natural resources in livelihoods and employment, including the gender dimensions of resource access and use, been addressed? \n- Have all relevant actors in the government, civil society, NGOs, international organizations and local and international private sector entities been engaged and consulted? \n- Have a selection of environmental and natural resource indicators to monitor DDR and any potential destabilizing trends been included? \n- Have the impact of government proposals and concession negotiations for extractive industries and any risks for security and durable peace been analysed and considered?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -218208,14 +218208,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3 Reintegration", "Heading3": "7.3.8 Reintegration support and waste management", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n- Have all relevant actors in the government, civil society, NGOs, international organizations and local and international private sector entities been engaged and consulted?", + "Sentence": "\n- Have all relevant actors in the government, civil society, NGOs, international organizations and local and international private sector entities been engaged and consulted?", "newParagraph": "reintegration key question n data collected analysed natural resource management including formal informal licit illicit activity relevant assessment inform reintegration option n opportunity exist reintegration activity natural resource management address root cause grievance led conflict n risk opportunity associated natural resource management relevant armed force group organized criminal group analysed conflict analysis determining effective approach reintegration avoid risk future conflict n cultural social dimension natural resource livelihood employment including gender dimension resource access use addressed n relevant actor government civil society ngo international organization local international private sector entity engaged consulted n selection environmental natural resource indicator monitor ddr potential destabilizing trend included n impact government proposal concession negotiation extractive industry risk security durable peace analysed considered", "ProcessedSent": "n relevant actor government civil society ngo international organization local international private sector entity engaged consulted", "SentID": 12122 }, { "ParagraphID": 3326, - "Paragraph": "Reintegration: Key questions \\n- Has data been collected and analysed on natural resource management, including formal and informal, licit and illicit activities, through relevant assessments, to inform reintegration options? \\n- What opportunities exist for reintegration activities in natural resource management to address the root causes and grievances that led to conflict? \\n- Have the risks and opportunities associated with natural resource management as relevant to armed forces and groups or organized criminal groups been analysed (through conflict analysis) when determining effective approaches to reintegration that will avoid the risk of future conflict? \\n- Have the cultural and social dimensions of natural resources in livelihoods and employment, including the gender dimensions of resource access and use, been addressed? \\n- Have all relevant actors in the government, civil society, NGOs, international organizations and local and international private sector entities been engaged and consulted? \\n- Have a selection of environmental and natural resource indicators to monitor DDR and any potential destabilizing trends been included? \\n- Have the impact of government proposals and concession negotiations for extractive industries and any risks for security and durable peace been analysed and considered?", + "Paragraph": "Reintegration: Key questions \n- Has data been collected and analysed on natural resource management, including formal and informal, licit and illicit activities, through relevant assessments, to inform reintegration options? \n- What opportunities exist for reintegration activities in natural resource management to address the root causes and grievances that led to conflict? \n- Have the risks and opportunities associated with natural resource management as relevant to armed forces and groups or organized criminal groups been analysed (through conflict analysis) when determining effective approaches to reintegration that will avoid the risk of future conflict? \n- Have the cultural and social dimensions of natural resources in livelihoods and employment, including the gender dimensions of resource access and use, been addressed? \n- Have all relevant actors in the government, civil society, NGOs, international organizations and local and international private sector entities been engaged and consulted? \n- Have a selection of environmental and natural resource indicators to monitor DDR and any potential destabilizing trends been included? \n- Have the impact of government proposals and concession negotiations for extractive industries and any risks for security and durable peace been analysed and considered?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -218226,14 +218226,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3 Reintegration", "Heading3": "7.3.8 Reintegration support and waste management", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n- Have a selection of environmental and natural resource indicators to monitor DDR and any potential destabilizing trends been included?", + "Sentence": "\n- Have a selection of environmental and natural resource indicators to monitor DDR and any potential destabilizing trends been included?", "newParagraph": "reintegration key question n data collected analysed natural resource management including formal informal licit illicit activity relevant assessment inform reintegration option n opportunity exist reintegration activity natural resource management address root cause grievance led conflict n risk opportunity associated natural resource management relevant armed force group organized criminal group analysed conflict analysis determining effective approach reintegration avoid risk future conflict n cultural social dimension natural resource livelihood employment including gender dimension resource access use addressed n relevant actor government civil society ngo international organization local international private sector entity engaged consulted n selection environmental natural resource indicator monitor ddr potential destabilizing trend included n impact government proposal concession negotiation extractive industry risk security durable peace analysed considered", "ProcessedSent": "n selection environmental natural resource indicator monitor ddr potential destabilizing trend included", "SentID": 12123 }, { "ParagraphID": 3326, - "Paragraph": "Reintegration: Key questions \\n- Has data been collected and analysed on natural resource management, including formal and informal, licit and illicit activities, through relevant assessments, to inform reintegration options? \\n- What opportunities exist for reintegration activities in natural resource management to address the root causes and grievances that led to conflict? \\n- Have the risks and opportunities associated with natural resource management as relevant to armed forces and groups or organized criminal groups been analysed (through conflict analysis) when determining effective approaches to reintegration that will avoid the risk of future conflict? \\n- Have the cultural and social dimensions of natural resources in livelihoods and employment, including the gender dimensions of resource access and use, been addressed? \\n- Have all relevant actors in the government, civil society, NGOs, international organizations and local and international private sector entities been engaged and consulted? \\n- Have a selection of environmental and natural resource indicators to monitor DDR and any potential destabilizing trends been included? \\n- Have the impact of government proposals and concession negotiations for extractive industries and any risks for security and durable peace been analysed and considered?", + "Paragraph": "Reintegration: Key questions \n- Has data been collected and analysed on natural resource management, including formal and informal, licit and illicit activities, through relevant assessments, to inform reintegration options? \n- What opportunities exist for reintegration activities in natural resource management to address the root causes and grievances that led to conflict? \n- Have the risks and opportunities associated with natural resource management as relevant to armed forces and groups or organized criminal groups been analysed (through conflict analysis) when determining effective approaches to reintegration that will avoid the risk of future conflict? \n- Have the cultural and social dimensions of natural resources in livelihoods and employment, including the gender dimensions of resource access and use, been addressed? \n- Have all relevant actors in the government, civil society, NGOs, international organizations and local and international private sector entities been engaged and consulted? \n- Have a selection of environmental and natural resource indicators to monitor DDR and any potential destabilizing trends been included? \n- Have the impact of government proposals and concession negotiations for extractive industries and any risks for security and durable peace been analysed and considered?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -218244,7 +218244,7 @@ "Heading2": "7.3 Reintegration", "Heading3": "7.3.8 Reintegration support and waste management", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n- Have the impact of government proposals and concession negotiations for extractive industries and any risks for security and durable peace been analysed and considered?", + "Sentence": "\n- Have the impact of government proposals and concession negotiations for extractive industries and any risks for security and durable peace been analysed and considered?", "newParagraph": "reintegration key question n data collected analysed natural resource management including formal informal licit illicit activity relevant assessment inform reintegration option n opportunity exist reintegration activity natural resource management address root cause grievance led conflict n risk opportunity associated natural resource management relevant armed force group organized criminal group analysed conflict analysis determining effective approach reintegration avoid risk future conflict n cultural social dimension natural resource livelihood employment including gender dimension resource access use addressed n relevant actor government civil society ngo international organization local international private sector entity engaged consulted n selection environmental natural resource indicator monitor ddr potential destabilizing trend included n impact government proposal concession negotiation extractive industry risk security durable peace analysed considered", "ProcessedSent": "n impact government proposal concession negotiation extractive industry risk security durable peace analysed considered", "SentID": 12124 @@ -219097,7 +219097,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3336, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for conflict and security analysis: \\n Who in the communities\/society\/government\/armed groups benefits from the natural resources that were implicated in the conflict? How do men, women, boys, girls and people with disabilities benefit specifically? \\n Who has access to and control over natural resources? What is the role of armed groups in this? \\n What trends and changes in natural resources are being affected by climate change, and how is access and control over natural resources impacted by climate change? \\n Who has access to and control over land, water and non-extractive resources disaggregated by sex, age, ethnic and\/or religion? What is the role of armed groups in this? \\n What are the implications for those who do not carry arms (e.g., security and access to control over resources)? \\n Who are the most vulnerable people in regard to depletion of natural resources or contamination? \\n Who is vulnerable people in terms of safety and security regarding access to natural resources and what are the specific vulnerabilities of men, women, and minorities? \\n Which groups face constraints in regard to access to and ownership of capital assets?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for conflict and security analysis: \n Who in the communities\/society\/government\/armed groups benefits from the natural resources that were implicated in the conflict? How do men, women, boys, girls and people with disabilities benefit specifically? \n Who has access to and control over natural resources? What is the role of armed groups in this? \n What trends and changes in natural resources are being affected by climate change, and how is access and control over natural resources impacted by climate change? \n Who has access to and control over land, water and non-extractive resources disaggregated by sex, age, ethnic and\/or religion? What is the role of armed groups in this? \n What are the implications for those who do not carry arms (e.g., security and access to control over resources)? \n Who are the most vulnerable people in regard to depletion of natural resources or contamination? \n Who is vulnerable people in terms of safety and security regarding access to natural resources and what are the specific vulnerabilities of men, women, and minorities? \n Which groups face constraints in regard to access to and ownership of capital assets?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219108,14 +219108,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Sample questions for conflict and security analysis: \\n Who in the communities\/society\/government\/armed groups benefits from the natural resources that were implicated in the conflict?", + "Sentence": "Sample questions for conflict and security analysis: \n Who in the communities\/society\/government\/armed groups benefits from the natural resources that were implicated in the conflict?", "newParagraph": "sample question conflict security analysis n communitiessocietygovernmentarmed group benefit natural resource implicated conflict men woman boy girl people disability benefit specifically n access control natural resource role armed group n trend change natural resource affected climate change access control natural resource impacted climate change n access control land water nonextractive resource disaggregated sex age ethnic andor religion role armed group n implication carry arm eg security access control resource n vulnerable people regard depletion natural resource contamination n vulnerable people term safety security regarding access natural resource specific vulnerability men woman minority n group face constraint regard access ownership capital asset", "ProcessedSent": "sample question conflict security analysis n communitiessocietygovernmentarmed group benefit natural resource implicated conflict", "SentID": 12172 }, { "ParagraphID": 3336, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for conflict and security analysis: \\n Who in the communities\/society\/government\/armed groups benefits from the natural resources that were implicated in the conflict? How do men, women, boys, girls and people with disabilities benefit specifically? \\n Who has access to and control over natural resources? What is the role of armed groups in this? \\n What trends and changes in natural resources are being affected by climate change, and how is access and control over natural resources impacted by climate change? \\n Who has access to and control over land, water and non-extractive resources disaggregated by sex, age, ethnic and\/or religion? What is the role of armed groups in this? \\n What are the implications for those who do not carry arms (e.g., security and access to control over resources)? \\n Who are the most vulnerable people in regard to depletion of natural resources or contamination? \\n Who is vulnerable people in terms of safety and security regarding access to natural resources and what are the specific vulnerabilities of men, women, and minorities? \\n Which groups face constraints in regard to access to and ownership of capital assets?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for conflict and security analysis: \n Who in the communities\/society\/government\/armed groups benefits from the natural resources that were implicated in the conflict? How do men, women, boys, girls and people with disabilities benefit specifically? \n Who has access to and control over natural resources? What is the role of armed groups in this? \n What trends and changes in natural resources are being affected by climate change, and how is access and control over natural resources impacted by climate change? \n Who has access to and control over land, water and non-extractive resources disaggregated by sex, age, ethnic and\/or religion? What is the role of armed groups in this? \n What are the implications for those who do not carry arms (e.g., security and access to control over resources)? \n Who are the most vulnerable people in regard to depletion of natural resources or contamination? \n Who is vulnerable people in terms of safety and security regarding access to natural resources and what are the specific vulnerabilities of men, women, and minorities? \n Which groups face constraints in regard to access to and ownership of capital assets?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219133,7 +219133,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3336, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for conflict and security analysis: \\n Who in the communities\/society\/government\/armed groups benefits from the natural resources that were implicated in the conflict? How do men, women, boys, girls and people with disabilities benefit specifically? \\n Who has access to and control over natural resources? What is the role of armed groups in this? \\n What trends and changes in natural resources are being affected by climate change, and how is access and control over natural resources impacted by climate change? \\n Who has access to and control over land, water and non-extractive resources disaggregated by sex, age, ethnic and\/or religion? What is the role of armed groups in this? \\n What are the implications for those who do not carry arms (e.g., security and access to control over resources)? \\n Who are the most vulnerable people in regard to depletion of natural resources or contamination? \\n Who is vulnerable people in terms of safety and security regarding access to natural resources and what are the specific vulnerabilities of men, women, and minorities? \\n Which groups face constraints in regard to access to and ownership of capital assets?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for conflict and security analysis: \n Who in the communities\/society\/government\/armed groups benefits from the natural resources that were implicated in the conflict? How do men, women, boys, girls and people with disabilities benefit specifically? \n Who has access to and control over natural resources? What is the role of armed groups in this? \n What trends and changes in natural resources are being affected by climate change, and how is access and control over natural resources impacted by climate change? \n Who has access to and control over land, water and non-extractive resources disaggregated by sex, age, ethnic and\/or religion? What is the role of armed groups in this? \n What are the implications for those who do not carry arms (e.g., security and access to control over resources)? \n Who are the most vulnerable people in regard to depletion of natural resources or contamination? \n Who is vulnerable people in terms of safety and security regarding access to natural resources and what are the specific vulnerabilities of men, women, and minorities? \n Which groups face constraints in regard to access to and ownership of capital assets?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219144,14 +219144,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Who has access to and control over natural resources?", + "Sentence": "\n Who has access to and control over natural resources?", "newParagraph": "sample question conflict security analysis n communitiessocietygovernmentarmed group benefit natural resource implicated conflict men woman boy girl people disability benefit specifically n access control natural resource role armed group n trend change natural resource affected climate change access control natural resource impacted climate change n access control land water nonextractive resource disaggregated sex age ethnic andor religion role armed group n implication carry arm eg security access control resource n vulnerable people regard depletion natural resource contamination n vulnerable people term safety security regarding access natural resource specific vulnerability men woman minority n group face constraint regard access ownership capital asset", "ProcessedSent": "n access control natural resource", "SentID": 12174 }, { "ParagraphID": 3336, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for conflict and security analysis: \\n Who in the communities\/society\/government\/armed groups benefits from the natural resources that were implicated in the conflict? How do men, women, boys, girls and people with disabilities benefit specifically? \\n Who has access to and control over natural resources? What is the role of armed groups in this? \\n What trends and changes in natural resources are being affected by climate change, and how is access and control over natural resources impacted by climate change? \\n Who has access to and control over land, water and non-extractive resources disaggregated by sex, age, ethnic and\/or religion? What is the role of armed groups in this? \\n What are the implications for those who do not carry arms (e.g., security and access to control over resources)? \\n Who are the most vulnerable people in regard to depletion of natural resources or contamination? \\n Who is vulnerable people in terms of safety and security regarding access to natural resources and what are the specific vulnerabilities of men, women, and minorities? \\n Which groups face constraints in regard to access to and ownership of capital assets?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for conflict and security analysis: \n Who in the communities\/society\/government\/armed groups benefits from the natural resources that were implicated in the conflict? How do men, women, boys, girls and people with disabilities benefit specifically? \n Who has access to and control over natural resources? What is the role of armed groups in this? \n What trends and changes in natural resources are being affected by climate change, and how is access and control over natural resources impacted by climate change? \n Who has access to and control over land, water and non-extractive resources disaggregated by sex, age, ethnic and\/or religion? What is the role of armed groups in this? \n What are the implications for those who do not carry arms (e.g., security and access to control over resources)? \n Who are the most vulnerable people in regard to depletion of natural resources or contamination? \n Who is vulnerable people in terms of safety and security regarding access to natural resources and what are the specific vulnerabilities of men, women, and minorities? \n Which groups face constraints in regard to access to and ownership of capital assets?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219169,7 +219169,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3336, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for conflict and security analysis: \\n Who in the communities\/society\/government\/armed groups benefits from the natural resources that were implicated in the conflict? How do men, women, boys, girls and people with disabilities benefit specifically? \\n Who has access to and control over natural resources? What is the role of armed groups in this? \\n What trends and changes in natural resources are being affected by climate change, and how is access and control over natural resources impacted by climate change? \\n Who has access to and control over land, water and non-extractive resources disaggregated by sex, age, ethnic and\/or religion? What is the role of armed groups in this? \\n What are the implications for those who do not carry arms (e.g., security and access to control over resources)? \\n Who are the most vulnerable people in regard to depletion of natural resources or contamination? \\n Who is vulnerable people in terms of safety and security regarding access to natural resources and what are the specific vulnerabilities of men, women, and minorities? \\n Which groups face constraints in regard to access to and ownership of capital assets?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for conflict and security analysis: \n Who in the communities\/society\/government\/armed groups benefits from the natural resources that were implicated in the conflict? How do men, women, boys, girls and people with disabilities benefit specifically? \n Who has access to and control over natural resources? What is the role of armed groups in this? \n What trends and changes in natural resources are being affected by climate change, and how is access and control over natural resources impacted by climate change? \n Who has access to and control over land, water and non-extractive resources disaggregated by sex, age, ethnic and\/or religion? What is the role of armed groups in this? \n What are the implications for those who do not carry arms (e.g., security and access to control over resources)? \n Who are the most vulnerable people in regard to depletion of natural resources or contamination? \n Who is vulnerable people in terms of safety and security regarding access to natural resources and what are the specific vulnerabilities of men, women, and minorities? \n Which groups face constraints in regard to access to and ownership of capital assets?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219180,14 +219180,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What trends and changes in natural resources are being affected by climate change, and how is access and control over natural resources impacted by climate change?", + "Sentence": "\n What trends and changes in natural resources are being affected by climate change, and how is access and control over natural resources impacted by climate change?", "newParagraph": "sample question conflict security analysis n communitiessocietygovernmentarmed group benefit natural resource implicated conflict men woman boy girl people disability benefit specifically n access control natural resource role armed group n trend change natural resource affected climate change access control natural resource impacted climate change n access control land water nonextractive resource disaggregated sex age ethnic andor religion role armed group n implication carry arm eg security access control resource n vulnerable people regard depletion natural resource contamination n vulnerable people term safety security regarding access natural resource specific vulnerability men woman minority n group face constraint regard access ownership capital asset", "ProcessedSent": "n trend change natural resource affected climate change access control natural resource impacted climate change", "SentID": 12176 }, { "ParagraphID": 3336, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for conflict and security analysis: \\n Who in the communities\/society\/government\/armed groups benefits from the natural resources that were implicated in the conflict? How do men, women, boys, girls and people with disabilities benefit specifically? \\n Who has access to and control over natural resources? What is the role of armed groups in this? \\n What trends and changes in natural resources are being affected by climate change, and how is access and control over natural resources impacted by climate change? \\n Who has access to and control over land, water and non-extractive resources disaggregated by sex, age, ethnic and\/or religion? What is the role of armed groups in this? \\n What are the implications for those who do not carry arms (e.g., security and access to control over resources)? \\n Who are the most vulnerable people in regard to depletion of natural resources or contamination? \\n Who is vulnerable people in terms of safety and security regarding access to natural resources and what are the specific vulnerabilities of men, women, and minorities? \\n Which groups face constraints in regard to access to and ownership of capital assets?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for conflict and security analysis: \n Who in the communities\/society\/government\/armed groups benefits from the natural resources that were implicated in the conflict? How do men, women, boys, girls and people with disabilities benefit specifically? \n Who has access to and control over natural resources? What is the role of armed groups in this? \n What trends and changes in natural resources are being affected by climate change, and how is access and control over natural resources impacted by climate change? \n Who has access to and control over land, water and non-extractive resources disaggregated by sex, age, ethnic and\/or religion? What is the role of armed groups in this? \n What are the implications for those who do not carry arms (e.g., security and access to control over resources)? \n Who are the most vulnerable people in regard to depletion of natural resources or contamination? \n Who is vulnerable people in terms of safety and security regarding access to natural resources and what are the specific vulnerabilities of men, women, and minorities? \n Which groups face constraints in regard to access to and ownership of capital assets?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219198,14 +219198,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Who has access to and control over land, water and non-extractive resources disaggregated by sex, age, ethnic and\/or religion?", + "Sentence": "\n Who has access to and control over land, water and non-extractive resources disaggregated by sex, age, ethnic and\/or religion?", "newParagraph": "sample question conflict security analysis n communitiessocietygovernmentarmed group benefit natural resource implicated conflict men woman boy girl people disability benefit specifically n access control natural resource role armed group n trend change natural resource affected climate change access control natural resource impacted climate change n access control land water nonextractive resource disaggregated sex age ethnic andor religion role armed group n implication carry arm eg security access control resource n vulnerable people regard depletion natural resource contamination n vulnerable people term safety security regarding access natural resource specific vulnerability men woman minority n group face constraint regard access ownership capital asset", "ProcessedSent": "n access control land water nonextractive resource disaggregated sex age ethnic andor religion", "SentID": 12177 }, { "ParagraphID": 3336, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for conflict and security analysis: \\n Who in the communities\/society\/government\/armed groups benefits from the natural resources that were implicated in the conflict? How do men, women, boys, girls and people with disabilities benefit specifically? \\n Who has access to and control over natural resources? What is the role of armed groups in this? \\n What trends and changes in natural resources are being affected by climate change, and how is access and control over natural resources impacted by climate change? \\n Who has access to and control over land, water and non-extractive resources disaggregated by sex, age, ethnic and\/or religion? What is the role of armed groups in this? \\n What are the implications for those who do not carry arms (e.g., security and access to control over resources)? \\n Who are the most vulnerable people in regard to depletion of natural resources or contamination? \\n Who is vulnerable people in terms of safety and security regarding access to natural resources and what are the specific vulnerabilities of men, women, and minorities? \\n Which groups face constraints in regard to access to and ownership of capital assets?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for conflict and security analysis: \n Who in the communities\/society\/government\/armed groups benefits from the natural resources that were implicated in the conflict? How do men, women, boys, girls and people with disabilities benefit specifically? \n Who has access to and control over natural resources? What is the role of armed groups in this? \n What trends and changes in natural resources are being affected by climate change, and how is access and control over natural resources impacted by climate change? \n Who has access to and control over land, water and non-extractive resources disaggregated by sex, age, ethnic and\/or religion? What is the role of armed groups in this? \n What are the implications for those who do not carry arms (e.g., security and access to control over resources)? \n Who are the most vulnerable people in regard to depletion of natural resources or contamination? \n Who is vulnerable people in terms of safety and security regarding access to natural resources and what are the specific vulnerabilities of men, women, and minorities? \n Which groups face constraints in regard to access to and ownership of capital assets?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219223,7 +219223,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3336, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for conflict and security analysis: \\n Who in the communities\/society\/government\/armed groups benefits from the natural resources that were implicated in the conflict? How do men, women, boys, girls and people with disabilities benefit specifically? \\n Who has access to and control over natural resources? What is the role of armed groups in this? \\n What trends and changes in natural resources are being affected by climate change, and how is access and control over natural resources impacted by climate change? \\n Who has access to and control over land, water and non-extractive resources disaggregated by sex, age, ethnic and\/or religion? What is the role of armed groups in this? \\n What are the implications for those who do not carry arms (e.g., security and access to control over resources)? \\n Who are the most vulnerable people in regard to depletion of natural resources or contamination? \\n Who is vulnerable people in terms of safety and security regarding access to natural resources and what are the specific vulnerabilities of men, women, and minorities? \\n Which groups face constraints in regard to access to and ownership of capital assets?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for conflict and security analysis: \n Who in the communities\/society\/government\/armed groups benefits from the natural resources that were implicated in the conflict? How do men, women, boys, girls and people with disabilities benefit specifically? \n Who has access to and control over natural resources? What is the role of armed groups in this? \n What trends and changes in natural resources are being affected by climate change, and how is access and control over natural resources impacted by climate change? \n Who has access to and control over land, water and non-extractive resources disaggregated by sex, age, ethnic and\/or religion? What is the role of armed groups in this? \n What are the implications for those who do not carry arms (e.g., security and access to control over resources)? \n Who are the most vulnerable people in regard to depletion of natural resources or contamination? \n Who is vulnerable people in terms of safety and security regarding access to natural resources and what are the specific vulnerabilities of men, women, and minorities? \n Which groups face constraints in regard to access to and ownership of capital assets?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219234,14 +219234,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are the implications for those who do not carry arms (e.g., security and access to control over resources)?", + "Sentence": "\n What are the implications for those who do not carry arms (e.g., security and access to control over resources)?", "newParagraph": "sample question conflict security analysis n communitiessocietygovernmentarmed group benefit natural resource implicated conflict men woman boy girl people disability benefit specifically n access control natural resource role armed group n trend change natural resource affected climate change access control natural resource impacted climate change n access control land water nonextractive resource disaggregated sex age ethnic andor religion role armed group n implication carry arm eg security access control resource n vulnerable people regard depletion natural resource contamination n vulnerable people term safety security regarding access natural resource specific vulnerability men woman minority n group face constraint regard access ownership capital asset", "ProcessedSent": "n implication carry arm eg security access control resource", "SentID": 12179 }, { "ParagraphID": 3336, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for conflict and security analysis: \\n Who in the communities\/society\/government\/armed groups benefits from the natural resources that were implicated in the conflict? How do men, women, boys, girls and people with disabilities benefit specifically? \\n Who has access to and control over natural resources? What is the role of armed groups in this? \\n What trends and changes in natural resources are being affected by climate change, and how is access and control over natural resources impacted by climate change? \\n Who has access to and control over land, water and non-extractive resources disaggregated by sex, age, ethnic and\/or religion? What is the role of armed groups in this? \\n What are the implications for those who do not carry arms (e.g., security and access to control over resources)? \\n Who are the most vulnerable people in regard to depletion of natural resources or contamination? \\n Who is vulnerable people in terms of safety and security regarding access to natural resources and what are the specific vulnerabilities of men, women, and minorities? \\n Which groups face constraints in regard to access to and ownership of capital assets?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for conflict and security analysis: \n Who in the communities\/society\/government\/armed groups benefits from the natural resources that were implicated in the conflict? How do men, women, boys, girls and people with disabilities benefit specifically? \n Who has access to and control over natural resources? What is the role of armed groups in this? \n What trends and changes in natural resources are being affected by climate change, and how is access and control over natural resources impacted by climate change? \n Who has access to and control over land, water and non-extractive resources disaggregated by sex, age, ethnic and\/or religion? What is the role of armed groups in this? \n What are the implications for those who do not carry arms (e.g., security and access to control over resources)? \n Who are the most vulnerable people in regard to depletion of natural resources or contamination? \n Who is vulnerable people in terms of safety and security regarding access to natural resources and what are the specific vulnerabilities of men, women, and minorities? \n Which groups face constraints in regard to access to and ownership of capital assets?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219252,14 +219252,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Who are the most vulnerable people in regard to depletion of natural resources or contamination?", + "Sentence": "\n Who are the most vulnerable people in regard to depletion of natural resources or contamination?", "newParagraph": "sample question conflict security analysis n communitiessocietygovernmentarmed group benefit natural resource implicated conflict men woman boy girl people disability benefit specifically n access control natural resource role armed group n trend change natural resource affected climate change access control natural resource impacted climate change n access control land water nonextractive resource disaggregated sex age ethnic andor religion role armed group n implication carry arm eg security access control resource n vulnerable people regard depletion natural resource contamination n vulnerable people term safety security regarding access natural resource specific vulnerability men woman minority n group face constraint regard access ownership capital asset", "ProcessedSent": "n vulnerable people regard depletion natural resource contamination", "SentID": 12180 }, { "ParagraphID": 3336, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for conflict and security analysis: \\n Who in the communities\/society\/government\/armed groups benefits from the natural resources that were implicated in the conflict? How do men, women, boys, girls and people with disabilities benefit specifically? \\n Who has access to and control over natural resources? What is the role of armed groups in this? \\n What trends and changes in natural resources are being affected by climate change, and how is access and control over natural resources impacted by climate change? \\n Who has access to and control over land, water and non-extractive resources disaggregated by sex, age, ethnic and\/or religion? What is the role of armed groups in this? \\n What are the implications for those who do not carry arms (e.g., security and access to control over resources)? \\n Who are the most vulnerable people in regard to depletion of natural resources or contamination? \\n Who is vulnerable people in terms of safety and security regarding access to natural resources and what are the specific vulnerabilities of men, women, and minorities? \\n Which groups face constraints in regard to access to and ownership of capital assets?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for conflict and security analysis: \n Who in the communities\/society\/government\/armed groups benefits from the natural resources that were implicated in the conflict? How do men, women, boys, girls and people with disabilities benefit specifically? \n Who has access to and control over natural resources? What is the role of armed groups in this? \n What trends and changes in natural resources are being affected by climate change, and how is access and control over natural resources impacted by climate change? \n Who has access to and control over land, water and non-extractive resources disaggregated by sex, age, ethnic and\/or religion? What is the role of armed groups in this? \n What are the implications for those who do not carry arms (e.g., security and access to control over resources)? \n Who are the most vulnerable people in regard to depletion of natural resources or contamination? \n Who is vulnerable people in terms of safety and security regarding access to natural resources and what are the specific vulnerabilities of men, women, and minorities? \n Which groups face constraints in regard to access to and ownership of capital assets?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219270,14 +219270,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Who is vulnerable people in terms of safety and security regarding access to natural resources and what are the specific vulnerabilities of men, women, and minorities?", + "Sentence": "\n Who is vulnerable people in terms of safety and security regarding access to natural resources and what are the specific vulnerabilities of men, women, and minorities?", "newParagraph": "sample question conflict security analysis n communitiessocietygovernmentarmed group benefit natural resource implicated conflict men woman boy girl people disability benefit specifically n access control natural resource role armed group n trend change natural resource affected climate change access control natural resource impacted climate change n access control land water nonextractive resource disaggregated sex age ethnic andor religion role armed group n implication carry arm eg security access control resource n vulnerable people regard depletion natural resource contamination n vulnerable people term safety security regarding access natural resource specific vulnerability men woman minority n group face constraint regard access ownership capital asset", "ProcessedSent": "n vulnerable people term safety security regarding access natural resource specific vulnerability men woman minority", "SentID": 12181 }, { "ParagraphID": 3336, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for conflict and security analysis: \\n Who in the communities\/society\/government\/armed groups benefits from the natural resources that were implicated in the conflict? How do men, women, boys, girls and people with disabilities benefit specifically? \\n Who has access to and control over natural resources? What is the role of armed groups in this? \\n What trends and changes in natural resources are being affected by climate change, and how is access and control over natural resources impacted by climate change? \\n Who has access to and control over land, water and non-extractive resources disaggregated by sex, age, ethnic and\/or religion? What is the role of armed groups in this? \\n What are the implications for those who do not carry arms (e.g., security and access to control over resources)? \\n Who are the most vulnerable people in regard to depletion of natural resources or contamination? \\n Who is vulnerable people in terms of safety and security regarding access to natural resources and what are the specific vulnerabilities of men, women, and minorities? \\n Which groups face constraints in regard to access to and ownership of capital assets?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for conflict and security analysis: \n Who in the communities\/society\/government\/armed groups benefits from the natural resources that were implicated in the conflict? How do men, women, boys, girls and people with disabilities benefit specifically? \n Who has access to and control over natural resources? What is the role of armed groups in this? \n What trends and changes in natural resources are being affected by climate change, and how is access and control over natural resources impacted by climate change? \n Who has access to and control over land, water and non-extractive resources disaggregated by sex, age, ethnic and\/or religion? What is the role of armed groups in this? \n What are the implications for those who do not carry arms (e.g., security and access to control over resources)? \n Who are the most vulnerable people in regard to depletion of natural resources or contamination? \n Who is vulnerable people in terms of safety and security regarding access to natural resources and what are the specific vulnerabilities of men, women, and minorities? \n Which groups face constraints in regard to access to and ownership of capital assets?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219288,14 +219288,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Which groups face constraints in regard to access to and ownership of capital assets?", + "Sentence": "\n Which groups face constraints in regard to access to and ownership of capital assets?", "newParagraph": "sample question conflict security analysis n communitiessocietygovernmentarmed group benefit natural resource implicated conflict men woman boy girl people disability benefit specifically n access control natural resource role armed group n trend change natural resource affected climate change access control natural resource impacted climate change n access control land water nonextractive resource disaggregated sex age ethnic andor religion role armed group n implication carry arm eg security access control resource n vulnerable people regard depletion natural resource contamination n vulnerable people term safety security regarding access natural resource specific vulnerability men woman minority n group face constraint regard access ownership capital asset", "ProcessedSent": "n group face constraint regard access ownership capital asset", "SentID": 12182 }, { "ParagraphID": 3337, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for disarmament operations and transitional weapons and ammunition management: \\n Who within the armed groups or in the communities carry arms? Do they use these to control natural resources or specific territories? \\n What are the implications of disarmament and stockpile management sites for local communities\u2019 livelihoods and access to natural resources? Are the implications different for women and men? \\n What are the reasons for male and female members of armed groups to hold arms and ammunition (e.g., lack of alternative livelihoods, lootability of natural resources, status)? \\n What are the reasons for male and female community members to possess arms and ammunition (e.g. access to natural resources, protection, status)?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for disarmament operations and transitional weapons and ammunition management: \n Who within the armed groups or in the communities carry arms? Do they use these to control natural resources or specific territories? \n What are the implications of disarmament and stockpile management sites for local communities\u2019 livelihoods and access to natural resources? Are the implications different for women and men? \n What are the reasons for male and female members of armed groups to hold arms and ammunition (e.g., lack of alternative livelihoods, lootability of natural resources, status)? \n What are the reasons for male and female community members to possess arms and ammunition (e.g. access to natural resources, protection, status)?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219306,14 +219306,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Sample questions for disarmament operations and transitional weapons and ammunition management: \\n Who within the armed groups or in the communities carry arms?", + "Sentence": "Sample questions for disarmament operations and transitional weapons and ammunition management: \n Who within the armed groups or in the communities carry arms?", "newParagraph": "sample question disarmament operation transitional weapon ammunition management n within armed group community carry arm use control natural resource specific territory n implication disarmament stockpile management site local community livelihood access natural resource implication different woman men n reason male female member armed group hold arm ammunition eg lack alternative livelihood lootability natural resource status n reason male female community member posse arm ammunition eg access natural resource protection status", "ProcessedSent": "sample question disarmament operation transitional weapon ammunition management n within armed group community carry arm", "SentID": 12183 }, { "ParagraphID": 3337, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for disarmament operations and transitional weapons and ammunition management: \\n Who within the armed groups or in the communities carry arms? Do they use these to control natural resources or specific territories? \\n What are the implications of disarmament and stockpile management sites for local communities\u2019 livelihoods and access to natural resources? Are the implications different for women and men? \\n What are the reasons for male and female members of armed groups to hold arms and ammunition (e.g., lack of alternative livelihoods, lootability of natural resources, status)? \\n What are the reasons for male and female community members to possess arms and ammunition (e.g. access to natural resources, protection, status)?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for disarmament operations and transitional weapons and ammunition management: \n Who within the armed groups or in the communities carry arms? Do they use these to control natural resources or specific territories? \n What are the implications of disarmament and stockpile management sites for local communities\u2019 livelihoods and access to natural resources? Are the implications different for women and men? \n What are the reasons for male and female members of armed groups to hold arms and ammunition (e.g., lack of alternative livelihoods, lootability of natural resources, status)? \n What are the reasons for male and female community members to possess arms and ammunition (e.g. access to natural resources, protection, status)?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219331,7 +219331,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3337, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for disarmament operations and transitional weapons and ammunition management: \\n Who within the armed groups or in the communities carry arms? Do they use these to control natural resources or specific territories? \\n What are the implications of disarmament and stockpile management sites for local communities\u2019 livelihoods and access to natural resources? Are the implications different for women and men? \\n What are the reasons for male and female members of armed groups to hold arms and ammunition (e.g., lack of alternative livelihoods, lootability of natural resources, status)? \\n What are the reasons for male and female community members to possess arms and ammunition (e.g. access to natural resources, protection, status)?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for disarmament operations and transitional weapons and ammunition management: \n Who within the armed groups or in the communities carry arms? Do they use these to control natural resources or specific territories? \n What are the implications of disarmament and stockpile management sites for local communities\u2019 livelihoods and access to natural resources? Are the implications different for women and men? \n What are the reasons for male and female members of armed groups to hold arms and ammunition (e.g., lack of alternative livelihoods, lootability of natural resources, status)? \n What are the reasons for male and female community members to possess arms and ammunition (e.g. access to natural resources, protection, status)?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219342,14 +219342,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are the implications of disarmament and stockpile management sites for local communities\u2019 livelihoods and access to natural resources?", + "Sentence": "\n What are the implications of disarmament and stockpile management sites for local communities\u2019 livelihoods and access to natural resources?", "newParagraph": "sample question disarmament operation transitional weapon ammunition management n within armed group community carry arm use control natural resource specific territory n implication disarmament stockpile management site local community livelihood access natural resource implication different woman men n reason male female member armed group hold arm ammunition eg lack alternative livelihood lootability natural resource status n reason male female community member posse arm ammunition eg access natural resource protection status", "ProcessedSent": "n implication disarmament stockpile management site local community livelihood access natural resource", "SentID": 12185 }, { "ParagraphID": 3337, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for disarmament operations and transitional weapons and ammunition management: \\n Who within the armed groups or in the communities carry arms? Do they use these to control natural resources or specific territories? \\n What are the implications of disarmament and stockpile management sites for local communities\u2019 livelihoods and access to natural resources? Are the implications different for women and men? \\n What are the reasons for male and female members of armed groups to hold arms and ammunition (e.g., lack of alternative livelihoods, lootability of natural resources, status)? \\n What are the reasons for male and female community members to possess arms and ammunition (e.g. access to natural resources, protection, status)?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for disarmament operations and transitional weapons and ammunition management: \n Who within the armed groups or in the communities carry arms? Do they use these to control natural resources or specific territories? \n What are the implications of disarmament and stockpile management sites for local communities\u2019 livelihoods and access to natural resources? Are the implications different for women and men? \n What are the reasons for male and female members of armed groups to hold arms and ammunition (e.g., lack of alternative livelihoods, lootability of natural resources, status)? \n What are the reasons for male and female community members to possess arms and ammunition (e.g. access to natural resources, protection, status)?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219367,7 +219367,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3337, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for disarmament operations and transitional weapons and ammunition management: \\n Who within the armed groups or in the communities carry arms? Do they use these to control natural resources or specific territories? \\n What are the implications of disarmament and stockpile management sites for local communities\u2019 livelihoods and access to natural resources? Are the implications different for women and men? \\n What are the reasons for male and female members of armed groups to hold arms and ammunition (e.g., lack of alternative livelihoods, lootability of natural resources, status)? \\n What are the reasons for male and female community members to possess arms and ammunition (e.g. access to natural resources, protection, status)?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for disarmament operations and transitional weapons and ammunition management: \n Who within the armed groups or in the communities carry arms? Do they use these to control natural resources or specific territories? \n What are the implications of disarmament and stockpile management sites for local communities\u2019 livelihoods and access to natural resources? Are the implications different for women and men? \n What are the reasons for male and female members of armed groups to hold arms and ammunition (e.g., lack of alternative livelihoods, lootability of natural resources, status)? \n What are the reasons for male and female community members to possess arms and ammunition (e.g. access to natural resources, protection, status)?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219378,14 +219378,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are the reasons for male and female members of armed groups to hold arms and ammunition (e.g., lack of alternative livelihoods, lootability of natural resources, status)?", + "Sentence": "\n What are the reasons for male and female members of armed groups to hold arms and ammunition (e.g., lack of alternative livelihoods, lootability of natural resources, status)?", "newParagraph": "sample question disarmament operation transitional weapon ammunition management n within armed group community carry arm use control natural resource specific territory n implication disarmament stockpile management site local community livelihood access natural resource implication different woman men n reason male female member armed group hold arm ammunition eg lack alternative livelihood lootability natural resource status n reason male female community member posse arm ammunition eg access natural resource protection status", "ProcessedSent": "n reason male female member armed group hold arm ammunition eg lack alternative livelihood lootability natural resource status", "SentID": 12187 }, { "ParagraphID": 3337, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for disarmament operations and transitional weapons and ammunition management: \\n Who within the armed groups or in the communities carry arms? Do they use these to control natural resources or specific territories? \\n What are the implications of disarmament and stockpile management sites for local communities\u2019 livelihoods and access to natural resources? Are the implications different for women and men? \\n What are the reasons for male and female members of armed groups to hold arms and ammunition (e.g., lack of alternative livelihoods, lootability of natural resources, status)? \\n What are the reasons for male and female community members to possess arms and ammunition (e.g. access to natural resources, protection, status)?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for disarmament operations and transitional weapons and ammunition management: \n Who within the armed groups or in the communities carry arms? Do they use these to control natural resources or specific territories? \n What are the implications of disarmament and stockpile management sites for local communities\u2019 livelihoods and access to natural resources? Are the implications different for women and men? \n What are the reasons for male and female members of armed groups to hold arms and ammunition (e.g., lack of alternative livelihoods, lootability of natural resources, status)? \n What are the reasons for male and female community members to possess arms and ammunition (e.g. access to natural resources, protection, status)?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219396,14 +219396,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are the reasons for male and female community members to possess arms and ammunition (e.g.", + "Sentence": "\n What are the reasons for male and female community members to possess arms and ammunition (e.g.", "newParagraph": "sample question disarmament operation transitional weapon ammunition management n within armed group community carry arm use control natural resource specific territory n implication disarmament stockpile management site local community livelihood access natural resource implication different woman men n reason male female member armed group hold arm ammunition eg lack alternative livelihood lootability natural resource status n reason male female community member posse arm ammunition eg access natural resource protection status", "ProcessedSent": "n reason male female community member posse arm ammunition eg", "SentID": 12188 }, { "ParagraphID": 3337, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for disarmament operations and transitional weapons and ammunition management: \\n Who within the armed groups or in the communities carry arms? Do they use these to control natural resources or specific territories? \\n What are the implications of disarmament and stockpile management sites for local communities\u2019 livelihoods and access to natural resources? Are the implications different for women and men? \\n What are the reasons for male and female members of armed groups to hold arms and ammunition (e.g., lack of alternative livelihoods, lootability of natural resources, status)? \\n What are the reasons for male and female community members to possess arms and ammunition (e.g. access to natural resources, protection, status)?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for disarmament operations and transitional weapons and ammunition management: \n Who within the armed groups or in the communities carry arms? Do they use these to control natural resources or specific territories? \n What are the implications of disarmament and stockpile management sites for local communities\u2019 livelihoods and access to natural resources? Are the implications different for women and men? \n What are the reasons for male and female members of armed groups to hold arms and ammunition (e.g., lack of alternative livelihoods, lootability of natural resources, status)? \n What are the reasons for male and female community members to possess arms and ammunition (e.g. access to natural resources, protection, status)?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219421,7 +219421,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3338, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for demobilization (including reinsertion): \\n How do cantonments or other demobilization sites affect local communities\u2019 access to natural resources? \\n How are women and men affected differently? \\n What are the infrastructure needs of local communities? \\n What are the differences of women and men\u2019s priorities? \\n In order to act in a manner inclusive of all relevant stakeholders, whose voices should be heard in the process of planning and implementing reinsertion activities with local communities? \\n What are the traditional roles of women and men in labour market participation? What are the differences between different age groups? \\n Do women or men have cultural roles that affect their participation (e.g. child care roles, cultural beliefs, time poverty)? \\n What skills and abilities are required from participants of the planned reinsertion activities? \\n Are there groups that require special support to be able to participate in reinsertion activities?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for demobilization (including reinsertion): \n How do cantonments or other demobilization sites affect local communities\u2019 access to natural resources? \n How are women and men affected differently? \n What are the infrastructure needs of local communities? \n What are the differences of women and men\u2019s priorities? \n In order to act in a manner inclusive of all relevant stakeholders, whose voices should be heard in the process of planning and implementing reinsertion activities with local communities? \n What are the traditional roles of women and men in labour market participation? What are the differences between different age groups? \n Do women or men have cultural roles that affect their participation (e.g. child care roles, cultural beliefs, time poverty)? \n What skills and abilities are required from participants of the planned reinsertion activities? \n Are there groups that require special support to be able to participate in reinsertion activities?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219432,14 +219432,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Sample questions for demobilization (including reinsertion): \\n How do cantonments or other demobilization sites affect local communities\u2019 access to natural resources?", + "Sentence": "Sample questions for demobilization (including reinsertion): \n How do cantonments or other demobilization sites affect local communities\u2019 access to natural resources?", "newParagraph": "sample question demobilization including reinsertion n cantonment demobilization site affect local community access natural resource n woman men affected differently n infrastructure need local community n difference woman men priority n order act manner inclusive relevant stakeholder whose voice heard process planning implementing reinsertion activity local community n traditional role woman men labour market participation difference different age group n woman men cultural role affect participation eg child care role cultural belief time poverty n skill ability required participant planned reinsertion activity n group require special support able participate reinsertion activity", "ProcessedSent": "sample question demobilization including reinsertion n cantonment demobilization site affect local community access natural resource", "SentID": 12190 }, { "ParagraphID": 3338, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for demobilization (including reinsertion): \\n How do cantonments or other demobilization sites affect local communities\u2019 access to natural resources? \\n How are women and men affected differently? \\n What are the infrastructure needs of local communities? \\n What are the differences of women and men\u2019s priorities? \\n In order to act in a manner inclusive of all relevant stakeholders, whose voices should be heard in the process of planning and implementing reinsertion activities with local communities? \\n What are the traditional roles of women and men in labour market participation? What are the differences between different age groups? \\n Do women or men have cultural roles that affect their participation (e.g. child care roles, cultural beliefs, time poverty)? \\n What skills and abilities are required from participants of the planned reinsertion activities? \\n Are there groups that require special support to be able to participate in reinsertion activities?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for demobilization (including reinsertion): \n How do cantonments or other demobilization sites affect local communities\u2019 access to natural resources? \n How are women and men affected differently? \n What are the infrastructure needs of local communities? \n What are the differences of women and men\u2019s priorities? \n In order to act in a manner inclusive of all relevant stakeholders, whose voices should be heard in the process of planning and implementing reinsertion activities with local communities? \n What are the traditional roles of women and men in labour market participation? What are the differences between different age groups? \n Do women or men have cultural roles that affect their participation (e.g. child care roles, cultural beliefs, time poverty)? \n What skills and abilities are required from participants of the planned reinsertion activities? \n Are there groups that require special support to be able to participate in reinsertion activities?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219450,14 +219450,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n How are women and men affected differently?", + "Sentence": "\n How are women and men affected differently?", "newParagraph": "sample question demobilization including reinsertion n cantonment demobilization site affect local community access natural resource n woman men affected differently n infrastructure need local community n difference woman men priority n order act manner inclusive relevant stakeholder whose voice heard process planning implementing reinsertion activity local community n traditional role woman men labour market participation difference different age group n woman men cultural role affect participation eg child care role cultural belief time poverty n skill ability required participant planned reinsertion activity n group require special support able participate reinsertion activity", "ProcessedSent": "n woman men affected differently", "SentID": 12191 }, { "ParagraphID": 3338, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for demobilization (including reinsertion): \\n How do cantonments or other demobilization sites affect local communities\u2019 access to natural resources? \\n How are women and men affected differently? \\n What are the infrastructure needs of local communities? \\n What are the differences of women and men\u2019s priorities? \\n In order to act in a manner inclusive of all relevant stakeholders, whose voices should be heard in the process of planning and implementing reinsertion activities with local communities? \\n What are the traditional roles of women and men in labour market participation? What are the differences between different age groups? \\n Do women or men have cultural roles that affect their participation (e.g. child care roles, cultural beliefs, time poverty)? \\n What skills and abilities are required from participants of the planned reinsertion activities? \\n Are there groups that require special support to be able to participate in reinsertion activities?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for demobilization (including reinsertion): \n How do cantonments or other demobilization sites affect local communities\u2019 access to natural resources? \n How are women and men affected differently? \n What are the infrastructure needs of local communities? \n What are the differences of women and men\u2019s priorities? \n In order to act in a manner inclusive of all relevant stakeholders, whose voices should be heard in the process of planning and implementing reinsertion activities with local communities? \n What are the traditional roles of women and men in labour market participation? What are the differences between different age groups? \n Do women or men have cultural roles that affect their participation (e.g. child care roles, cultural beliefs, time poverty)? \n What skills and abilities are required from participants of the planned reinsertion activities? \n Are there groups that require special support to be able to participate in reinsertion activities?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219468,14 +219468,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are the infrastructure needs of local communities?", + "Sentence": "\n What are the infrastructure needs of local communities?", "newParagraph": "sample question demobilization including reinsertion n cantonment demobilization site affect local community access natural resource n woman men affected differently n infrastructure need local community n difference woman men priority n order act manner inclusive relevant stakeholder whose voice heard process planning implementing reinsertion activity local community n traditional role woman men labour market participation difference different age group n woman men cultural role affect participation eg child care role cultural belief time poverty n skill ability required participant planned reinsertion activity n group require special support able participate reinsertion activity", "ProcessedSent": "n infrastructure need local community", "SentID": 12192 }, { "ParagraphID": 3338, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for demobilization (including reinsertion): \\n How do cantonments or other demobilization sites affect local communities\u2019 access to natural resources? \\n How are women and men affected differently? \\n What are the infrastructure needs of local communities? \\n What are the differences of women and men\u2019s priorities? \\n In order to act in a manner inclusive of all relevant stakeholders, whose voices should be heard in the process of planning and implementing reinsertion activities with local communities? \\n What are the traditional roles of women and men in labour market participation? What are the differences between different age groups? \\n Do women or men have cultural roles that affect their participation (e.g. child care roles, cultural beliefs, time poverty)? \\n What skills and abilities are required from participants of the planned reinsertion activities? \\n Are there groups that require special support to be able to participate in reinsertion activities?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for demobilization (including reinsertion): \n How do cantonments or other demobilization sites affect local communities\u2019 access to natural resources? \n How are women and men affected differently? \n What are the infrastructure needs of local communities? \n What are the differences of women and men\u2019s priorities? \n In order to act in a manner inclusive of all relevant stakeholders, whose voices should be heard in the process of planning and implementing reinsertion activities with local communities? \n What are the traditional roles of women and men in labour market participation? What are the differences between different age groups? \n Do women or men have cultural roles that affect their participation (e.g. child care roles, cultural beliefs, time poverty)? \n What skills and abilities are required from participants of the planned reinsertion activities? \n Are there groups that require special support to be able to participate in reinsertion activities?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219486,14 +219486,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are the differences of women and men\u2019s priorities?", + "Sentence": "\n What are the differences of women and men\u2019s priorities?", "newParagraph": "sample question demobilization including reinsertion n cantonment demobilization site affect local community access natural resource n woman men affected differently n infrastructure need local community n difference woman men priority n order act manner inclusive relevant stakeholder whose voice heard process planning implementing reinsertion activity local community n traditional role woman men labour market participation difference different age group n woman men cultural role affect participation eg child care role cultural belief time poverty n skill ability required participant planned reinsertion activity n group require special support able participate reinsertion activity", "ProcessedSent": "n difference woman men priority", "SentID": 12193 }, { "ParagraphID": 3338, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for demobilization (including reinsertion): \\n How do cantonments or other demobilization sites affect local communities\u2019 access to natural resources? \\n How are women and men affected differently? \\n What are the infrastructure needs of local communities? \\n What are the differences of women and men\u2019s priorities? \\n In order to act in a manner inclusive of all relevant stakeholders, whose voices should be heard in the process of planning and implementing reinsertion activities with local communities? \\n What are the traditional roles of women and men in labour market participation? What are the differences between different age groups? \\n Do women or men have cultural roles that affect their participation (e.g. child care roles, cultural beliefs, time poverty)? \\n What skills and abilities are required from participants of the planned reinsertion activities? \\n Are there groups that require special support to be able to participate in reinsertion activities?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for demobilization (including reinsertion): \n How do cantonments or other demobilization sites affect local communities\u2019 access to natural resources? \n How are women and men affected differently? \n What are the infrastructure needs of local communities? \n What are the differences of women and men\u2019s priorities? \n In order to act in a manner inclusive of all relevant stakeholders, whose voices should be heard in the process of planning and implementing reinsertion activities with local communities? \n What are the traditional roles of women and men in labour market participation? What are the differences between different age groups? \n Do women or men have cultural roles that affect their participation (e.g. child care roles, cultural beliefs, time poverty)? \n What skills and abilities are required from participants of the planned reinsertion activities? \n Are there groups that require special support to be able to participate in reinsertion activities?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219504,14 +219504,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n In order to act in a manner inclusive of all relevant stakeholders, whose voices should be heard in the process of planning and implementing reinsertion activities with local communities?", + "Sentence": "\n In order to act in a manner inclusive of all relevant stakeholders, whose voices should be heard in the process of planning and implementing reinsertion activities with local communities?", "newParagraph": "sample question demobilization including reinsertion n cantonment demobilization site affect local community access natural resource n woman men affected differently n infrastructure need local community n difference woman men priority n order act manner inclusive relevant stakeholder whose voice heard process planning implementing reinsertion activity local community n traditional role woman men labour market participation difference different age group n woman men cultural role affect participation eg child care role cultural belief time poverty n skill ability required participant planned reinsertion activity n group require special support able participate reinsertion activity", "ProcessedSent": "n order act manner inclusive relevant stakeholder whose voice heard process planning implementing reinsertion activity local community", "SentID": 12194 }, { "ParagraphID": 3338, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for demobilization (including reinsertion): \\n How do cantonments or other demobilization sites affect local communities\u2019 access to natural resources? \\n How are women and men affected differently? \\n What are the infrastructure needs of local communities? \\n What are the differences of women and men\u2019s priorities? \\n In order to act in a manner inclusive of all relevant stakeholders, whose voices should be heard in the process of planning and implementing reinsertion activities with local communities? \\n What are the traditional roles of women and men in labour market participation? What are the differences between different age groups? \\n Do women or men have cultural roles that affect their participation (e.g. child care roles, cultural beliefs, time poverty)? \\n What skills and abilities are required from participants of the planned reinsertion activities? \\n Are there groups that require special support to be able to participate in reinsertion activities?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for demobilization (including reinsertion): \n How do cantonments or other demobilization sites affect local communities\u2019 access to natural resources? \n How are women and men affected differently? \n What are the infrastructure needs of local communities? \n What are the differences of women and men\u2019s priorities? \n In order to act in a manner inclusive of all relevant stakeholders, whose voices should be heard in the process of planning and implementing reinsertion activities with local communities? \n What are the traditional roles of women and men in labour market participation? What are the differences between different age groups? \n Do women or men have cultural roles that affect their participation (e.g. child care roles, cultural beliefs, time poverty)? \n What skills and abilities are required from participants of the planned reinsertion activities? \n Are there groups that require special support to be able to participate in reinsertion activities?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219522,14 +219522,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are the traditional roles of women and men in labour market participation?", + "Sentence": "\n What are the traditional roles of women and men in labour market participation?", "newParagraph": "sample question demobilization including reinsertion n cantonment demobilization site affect local community access natural resource n woman men affected differently n infrastructure need local community n difference woman men priority n order act manner inclusive relevant stakeholder whose voice heard process planning implementing reinsertion activity local community n traditional role woman men labour market participation difference different age group n woman men cultural role affect participation eg child care role cultural belief time poverty n skill ability required participant planned reinsertion activity n group require special support able participate reinsertion activity", "ProcessedSent": "n traditional role woman men labour market participation", "SentID": 12195 }, { "ParagraphID": 3338, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for demobilization (including reinsertion): \\n How do cantonments or other demobilization sites affect local communities\u2019 access to natural resources? \\n How are women and men affected differently? \\n What are the infrastructure needs of local communities? \\n What are the differences of women and men\u2019s priorities? \\n In order to act in a manner inclusive of all relevant stakeholders, whose voices should be heard in the process of planning and implementing reinsertion activities with local communities? \\n What are the traditional roles of women and men in labour market participation? What are the differences between different age groups? \\n Do women or men have cultural roles that affect their participation (e.g. child care roles, cultural beliefs, time poverty)? \\n What skills and abilities are required from participants of the planned reinsertion activities? \\n Are there groups that require special support to be able to participate in reinsertion activities?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for demobilization (including reinsertion): \n How do cantonments or other demobilization sites affect local communities\u2019 access to natural resources? \n How are women and men affected differently? \n What are the infrastructure needs of local communities? \n What are the differences of women and men\u2019s priorities? \n In order to act in a manner inclusive of all relevant stakeholders, whose voices should be heard in the process of planning and implementing reinsertion activities with local communities? \n What are the traditional roles of women and men in labour market participation? What are the differences between different age groups? \n Do women or men have cultural roles that affect their participation (e.g. child care roles, cultural beliefs, time poverty)? \n What skills and abilities are required from participants of the planned reinsertion activities? \n Are there groups that require special support to be able to participate in reinsertion activities?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219547,7 +219547,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3338, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for demobilization (including reinsertion): \\n How do cantonments or other demobilization sites affect local communities\u2019 access to natural resources? \\n How are women and men affected differently? \\n What are the infrastructure needs of local communities? \\n What are the differences of women and men\u2019s priorities? \\n In order to act in a manner inclusive of all relevant stakeholders, whose voices should be heard in the process of planning and implementing reinsertion activities with local communities? \\n What are the traditional roles of women and men in labour market participation? What are the differences between different age groups? \\n Do women or men have cultural roles that affect their participation (e.g. child care roles, cultural beliefs, time poverty)? \\n What skills and abilities are required from participants of the planned reinsertion activities? \\n Are there groups that require special support to be able to participate in reinsertion activities?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for demobilization (including reinsertion): \n How do cantonments or other demobilization sites affect local communities\u2019 access to natural resources? \n How are women and men affected differently? \n What are the infrastructure needs of local communities? \n What are the differences of women and men\u2019s priorities? \n In order to act in a manner inclusive of all relevant stakeholders, whose voices should be heard in the process of planning and implementing reinsertion activities with local communities? \n What are the traditional roles of women and men in labour market participation? What are the differences between different age groups? \n Do women or men have cultural roles that affect their participation (e.g. child care roles, cultural beliefs, time poverty)? \n What skills and abilities are required from participants of the planned reinsertion activities? \n Are there groups that require special support to be able to participate in reinsertion activities?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219558,14 +219558,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Do women or men have cultural roles that affect their participation (e.g.", + "Sentence": "\n Do women or men have cultural roles that affect their participation (e.g.", "newParagraph": "sample question demobilization including reinsertion n cantonment demobilization site affect local community access natural resource n woman men affected differently n infrastructure need local community n difference woman men priority n order act manner inclusive relevant stakeholder whose voice heard process planning implementing reinsertion activity local community n traditional role woman men labour market participation difference different age group n woman men cultural role affect participation eg child care role cultural belief time poverty n skill ability required participant planned reinsertion activity n group require special support able participate reinsertion activity", "ProcessedSent": "n woman men cultural role affect participation eg", "SentID": 12197 }, { "ParagraphID": 3338, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for demobilization (including reinsertion): \\n How do cantonments or other demobilization sites affect local communities\u2019 access to natural resources? \\n How are women and men affected differently? \\n What are the infrastructure needs of local communities? \\n What are the differences of women and men\u2019s priorities? \\n In order to act in a manner inclusive of all relevant stakeholders, whose voices should be heard in the process of planning and implementing reinsertion activities with local communities? \\n What are the traditional roles of women and men in labour market participation? What are the differences between different age groups? \\n Do women or men have cultural roles that affect their participation (e.g. child care roles, cultural beliefs, time poverty)? \\n What skills and abilities are required from participants of the planned reinsertion activities? \\n Are there groups that require special support to be able to participate in reinsertion activities?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for demobilization (including reinsertion): \n How do cantonments or other demobilization sites affect local communities\u2019 access to natural resources? \n How are women and men affected differently? \n What are the infrastructure needs of local communities? \n What are the differences of women and men\u2019s priorities? \n In order to act in a manner inclusive of all relevant stakeholders, whose voices should be heard in the process of planning and implementing reinsertion activities with local communities? \n What are the traditional roles of women and men in labour market participation? What are the differences between different age groups? \n Do women or men have cultural roles that affect their participation (e.g. child care roles, cultural beliefs, time poverty)? \n What skills and abilities are required from participants of the planned reinsertion activities? \n Are there groups that require special support to be able to participate in reinsertion activities?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219583,7 +219583,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3338, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for demobilization (including reinsertion): \\n How do cantonments or other demobilization sites affect local communities\u2019 access to natural resources? \\n How are women and men affected differently? \\n What are the infrastructure needs of local communities? \\n What are the differences of women and men\u2019s priorities? \\n In order to act in a manner inclusive of all relevant stakeholders, whose voices should be heard in the process of planning and implementing reinsertion activities with local communities? \\n What are the traditional roles of women and men in labour market participation? What are the differences between different age groups? \\n Do women or men have cultural roles that affect their participation (e.g. child care roles, cultural beliefs, time poverty)? \\n What skills and abilities are required from participants of the planned reinsertion activities? \\n Are there groups that require special support to be able to participate in reinsertion activities?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for demobilization (including reinsertion): \n How do cantonments or other demobilization sites affect local communities\u2019 access to natural resources? \n How are women and men affected differently? \n What are the infrastructure needs of local communities? \n What are the differences of women and men\u2019s priorities? \n In order to act in a manner inclusive of all relevant stakeholders, whose voices should be heard in the process of planning and implementing reinsertion activities with local communities? \n What are the traditional roles of women and men in labour market participation? What are the differences between different age groups? \n Do women or men have cultural roles that affect their participation (e.g. child care roles, cultural beliefs, time poverty)? \n What skills and abilities are required from participants of the planned reinsertion activities? \n Are there groups that require special support to be able to participate in reinsertion activities?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219594,14 +219594,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What skills and abilities are required from participants of the planned reinsertion activities?", + "Sentence": "\n What skills and abilities are required from participants of the planned reinsertion activities?", "newParagraph": "sample question demobilization including reinsertion n cantonment demobilization site affect local community access natural resource n woman men affected differently n infrastructure need local community n difference woman men priority n order act manner inclusive relevant stakeholder whose voice heard process planning implementing reinsertion activity local community n traditional role woman men labour market participation difference different age group n woman men cultural role affect participation eg child care role cultural belief time poverty n skill ability required participant planned reinsertion activity n group require special support able participate reinsertion activity", "ProcessedSent": "n skill ability required participant planned reinsertion activity", "SentID": 12199 }, { "ParagraphID": 3338, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for demobilization (including reinsertion): \\n How do cantonments or other demobilization sites affect local communities\u2019 access to natural resources? \\n How are women and men affected differently? \\n What are the infrastructure needs of local communities? \\n What are the differences of women and men\u2019s priorities? \\n In order to act in a manner inclusive of all relevant stakeholders, whose voices should be heard in the process of planning and implementing reinsertion activities with local communities? \\n What are the traditional roles of women and men in labour market participation? What are the differences between different age groups? \\n Do women or men have cultural roles that affect their participation (e.g. child care roles, cultural beliefs, time poverty)? \\n What skills and abilities are required from participants of the planned reinsertion activities? \\n Are there groups that require special support to be able to participate in reinsertion activities?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for demobilization (including reinsertion): \n How do cantonments or other demobilization sites affect local communities\u2019 access to natural resources? \n How are women and men affected differently? \n What are the infrastructure needs of local communities? \n What are the differences of women and men\u2019s priorities? \n In order to act in a manner inclusive of all relevant stakeholders, whose voices should be heard in the process of planning and implementing reinsertion activities with local communities? \n What are the traditional roles of women and men in labour market participation? What are the differences between different age groups? \n Do women or men have cultural roles that affect their participation (e.g. child care roles, cultural beliefs, time poverty)? \n What skills and abilities are required from participants of the planned reinsertion activities? \n Are there groups that require special support to be able to participate in reinsertion activities?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219612,14 +219612,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Are there groups that require special support to be able to participate in reinsertion activities?", + "Sentence": "\n Are there groups that require special support to be able to participate in reinsertion activities?", "newParagraph": "sample question demobilization including reinsertion n cantonment demobilization site affect local community access natural resource n woman men affected differently n infrastructure need local community n difference woman men priority n order act manner inclusive relevant stakeholder whose voice heard process planning implementing reinsertion activity local community n traditional role woman men labour market participation difference different age group n woman men cultural role affect participation eg child care role cultural belief time poverty n skill ability required participant planned reinsertion activity n group require special support able participate reinsertion activity", "ProcessedSent": "n group require special support able participate reinsertion activity", "SentID": 12200 }, { "ParagraphID": 3339, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \\n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \\n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \\n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \\n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \\n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \\n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \\n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \\n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \\n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \\n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \\n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \\n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \\n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219630,14 +219630,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \\n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community?", + "Sentence": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community?", "newParagraph": "sample question reintegration community violence reduction programme n gender role woman men different age group community n decision men woman make family community n within household carry task eg subsistencebreadwinning decision making income spending child care household chore n incentive economic opportunity different family member receives n expenditure men woman responsible n rigid gendered division labour n daily seasonal variation woman men labour supply n access control enabling asset productive resource eg land finance credit n access control human capital resource eg education knowledge time mobility n implication limited access control risk safety security access natural resource n constraint men woman different age group operate differ n especially vulnerable group term access natural resource eg woman without male relative internally displaced people femaleheaded household youth person disability n support need group eg legal aid awareness raising stigmatization protection barrier full participation group mitigated", "ProcessedSent": "sample question reintegration community violence reduction programme n gender role woman men different age group community", "SentID": 12201 }, { "ParagraphID": 3339, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \\n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \\n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \\n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \\n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \\n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \\n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \\n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \\n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \\n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \\n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \\n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \\n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \\n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219648,14 +219648,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community?", + "Sentence": "\n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community?", "newParagraph": "sample question reintegration community violence reduction programme n gender role woman men different age group community n decision men woman make family community n within household carry task eg subsistencebreadwinning decision making income spending child care household chore n incentive economic opportunity different family member receives n expenditure men woman responsible n rigid gendered division labour n daily seasonal variation woman men labour supply n access control enabling asset productive resource eg land finance credit n access control human capital resource eg education knowledge time mobility n implication limited access control risk safety security access natural resource n constraint men woman different age group operate differ n especially vulnerable group term access natural resource eg woman without male relative internally displaced people femaleheaded household youth person disability n support need group eg legal aid awareness raising stigmatization protection barrier full participation group mitigated", "ProcessedSent": "n decision men woman make family community", "SentID": 12202 }, { "ParagraphID": 3339, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \\n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \\n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \\n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \\n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \\n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \\n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \\n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \\n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \\n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \\n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \\n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \\n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \\n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219666,14 +219666,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g.", + "Sentence": "\n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g.", "newParagraph": "sample question reintegration community violence reduction programme n gender role woman men different age group community n decision men woman make family community n within household carry task eg subsistencebreadwinning decision making income spending child care household chore n incentive economic opportunity different family member receives n expenditure men woman responsible n rigid gendered division labour n daily seasonal variation woman men labour supply n access control enabling asset productive resource eg land finance credit n access control human capital resource eg education knowledge time mobility n implication limited access control risk safety security access natural resource n constraint men woman different age group operate differ n especially vulnerable group term access natural resource eg woman without male relative internally displaced people femaleheaded household youth person disability n support need group eg legal aid awareness raising stigmatization protection barrier full participation group mitigated", "ProcessedSent": "n within household carry task eg", "SentID": 12203 }, { "ParagraphID": 3339, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \\n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \\n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \\n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \\n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \\n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \\n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \\n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \\n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \\n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \\n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \\n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \\n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \\n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219691,7 +219691,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3339, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \\n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \\n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \\n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \\n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \\n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \\n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \\n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \\n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \\n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \\n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \\n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \\n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \\n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219702,14 +219702,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them?", + "Sentence": "\n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them?", "newParagraph": "sample question reintegration community violence reduction programme n gender role woman men different age group community n decision men woman make family community n within household carry task eg subsistencebreadwinning decision making income spending child care household chore n incentive economic opportunity different family member receives n expenditure men woman responsible n rigid gendered division labour n daily seasonal variation woman men labour supply n access control enabling asset productive resource eg land finance credit n access control human capital resource eg education knowledge time mobility n implication limited access control risk safety security access natural resource n constraint men woman different age group operate differ n especially vulnerable group term access natural resource eg woman without male relative internally displaced people femaleheaded household youth person disability n support need group eg legal aid awareness raising stigmatization protection barrier full participation group mitigated", "ProcessedSent": "n incentive economic opportunity different family member receives", "SentID": 12205 }, { "ParagraphID": 3339, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \\n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \\n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \\n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \\n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \\n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \\n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \\n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \\n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \\n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \\n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \\n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \\n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \\n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219720,14 +219720,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for?", + "Sentence": "\n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for?", "newParagraph": "sample question reintegration community violence reduction programme n gender role woman men different age group community n decision men woman make family community n within household carry task eg subsistencebreadwinning decision making income spending child care household chore n incentive economic opportunity different family member receives n expenditure men woman responsible n rigid gendered division labour n daily seasonal variation woman men labour supply n access control enabling asset productive resource eg land finance credit n access control human capital resource eg education knowledge time mobility n implication limited access control risk safety security access natural resource n constraint men woman different age group operate differ n especially vulnerable group term access natural resource eg woman without male relative internally displaced people femaleheaded household youth person disability n support need group eg legal aid awareness raising stigmatization protection barrier full participation group mitigated", "ProcessedSent": "n expenditure men woman responsible", "SentID": 12206 }, { "ParagraphID": 3339, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \\n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \\n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \\n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \\n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \\n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \\n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \\n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \\n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \\n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \\n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \\n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \\n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \\n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219738,14 +219738,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n How rigid is the gendered division of labour?", + "Sentence": "\n How rigid is the gendered division of labour?", "newParagraph": "sample question reintegration community violence reduction programme n gender role woman men different age group community n decision men woman make family community n within household carry task eg subsistencebreadwinning decision making income spending child care household chore n incentive economic opportunity different family member receives n expenditure men woman responsible n rigid gendered division labour n daily seasonal variation woman men labour supply n access control enabling asset productive resource eg land finance credit n access control human capital resource eg education knowledge time mobility n implication limited access control risk safety security access natural resource n constraint men woman different age group operate differ n especially vulnerable group term access natural resource eg woman without male relative internally displaced people femaleheaded household youth person disability n support need group eg legal aid awareness raising stigmatization protection barrier full participation group mitigated", "ProcessedSent": "n rigid gendered division labour", "SentID": 12207 }, { "ParagraphID": 3339, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \\n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \\n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \\n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \\n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \\n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \\n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \\n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \\n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \\n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \\n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \\n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \\n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \\n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219756,14 +219756,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply?", + "Sentence": "\n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply?", "newParagraph": "sample question reintegration community violence reduction programme n gender role woman men different age group community n decision men woman make family community n within household carry task eg subsistencebreadwinning decision making income spending child care household chore n incentive economic opportunity different family member receives n expenditure men woman responsible n rigid gendered division labour n daily seasonal variation woman men labour supply n access control enabling asset productive resource eg land finance credit n access control human capital resource eg education knowledge time mobility n implication limited access control risk safety security access natural resource n constraint men woman different age group operate differ n especially vulnerable group term access natural resource eg woman without male relative internally displaced people femaleheaded household youth person disability n support need group eg legal aid awareness raising stigmatization protection barrier full participation group mitigated", "ProcessedSent": "n daily seasonal variation woman men labour supply", "SentID": 12208 }, { "ParagraphID": 3339, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \\n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \\n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \\n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \\n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \\n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \\n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \\n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \\n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \\n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \\n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \\n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \\n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \\n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219774,14 +219774,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)?", + "Sentence": "\n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)?", "newParagraph": "sample question reintegration community violence reduction programme n gender role woman men different age group community n decision men woman make family community n within household carry task eg subsistencebreadwinning decision making income spending child care household chore n incentive economic opportunity different family member receives n expenditure men woman responsible n rigid gendered division labour n daily seasonal variation woman men labour supply n access control enabling asset productive resource eg land finance credit n access control human capital resource eg education knowledge time mobility n implication limited access control risk safety security access natural resource n constraint men woman different age group operate differ n especially vulnerable group term access natural resource eg woman without male relative internally displaced people femaleheaded household youth person disability n support need group eg legal aid awareness raising stigmatization protection barrier full participation group mitigated", "ProcessedSent": "n access control enabling asset productive resource eg land finance credit", "SentID": 12209 }, { "ParagraphID": 3339, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \\n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \\n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \\n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \\n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \\n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \\n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \\n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \\n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \\n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \\n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \\n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \\n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \\n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219792,14 +219792,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)?", + "Sentence": "\n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)?", "newParagraph": "sample question reintegration community violence reduction programme n gender role woman men different age group community n decision men woman make family community n within household carry task eg subsistencebreadwinning decision making income spending child care household chore n incentive economic opportunity different family member receives n expenditure men woman responsible n rigid gendered division labour n daily seasonal variation woman men labour supply n access control enabling asset productive resource eg land finance credit n access control human capital resource eg education knowledge time mobility n implication limited access control risk safety security access natural resource n constraint men woman different age group operate differ n especially vulnerable group term access natural resource eg woman without male relative internally displaced people femaleheaded household youth person disability n support need group eg legal aid awareness raising stigmatization protection barrier full participation group mitigated", "ProcessedSent": "n access control human capital resource eg education knowledge time mobility", "SentID": 12210 }, { "ParagraphID": 3339, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \\n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \\n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \\n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \\n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \\n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \\n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \\n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \\n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \\n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \\n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \\n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \\n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \\n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219810,14 +219810,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are the implications for those with limited access or control?", + "Sentence": "\n What are the implications for those with limited access or control?", "newParagraph": "sample question reintegration community violence reduction programme n gender role woman men different age group community n decision men woman make family community n within household carry task eg subsistencebreadwinning decision making income spending child care household chore n incentive economic opportunity different family member receives n expenditure men woman responsible n rigid gendered division labour n daily seasonal variation woman men labour supply n access control enabling asset productive resource eg land finance credit n access control human capital resource eg education knowledge time mobility n implication limited access control risk safety security access natural resource n constraint men woman different age group operate differ n especially vulnerable group term access natural resource eg woman without male relative internally displaced people femaleheaded household youth person disability n support need group eg legal aid awareness raising stigmatization protection barrier full participation group mitigated", "ProcessedSent": "n implication limited access control", "SentID": 12211 }, { "ParagraphID": 3339, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \\n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \\n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \\n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \\n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \\n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \\n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \\n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \\n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \\n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \\n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \\n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \\n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \\n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219835,7 +219835,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3339, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \\n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \\n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \\n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \\n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \\n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \\n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \\n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \\n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \\n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \\n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \\n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \\n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \\n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219846,14 +219846,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ?", + "Sentence": "\n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ?", "newParagraph": "sample question reintegration community violence reduction programme n gender role woman men different age group community n decision men woman make family community n within household carry task eg subsistencebreadwinning decision making income spending child care household chore n incentive economic opportunity different family member receives n expenditure men woman responsible n rigid gendered division labour n daily seasonal variation woman men labour supply n access control enabling asset productive resource eg land finance credit n access control human capital resource eg education knowledge time mobility n implication limited access control risk safety security access natural resource n constraint men woman different age group operate differ n especially vulnerable group term access natural resource eg woman without male relative internally displaced people femaleheaded household youth person disability n support need group eg legal aid awareness raising stigmatization protection barrier full participation group mitigated", "ProcessedSent": "n constraint men woman different age group operate differ", "SentID": 12213 }, { "ParagraphID": 3339, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \\n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \\n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \\n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \\n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \\n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \\n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \\n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \\n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \\n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \\n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \\n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \\n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \\n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219864,14 +219864,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)?", + "Sentence": "\n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)?", "newParagraph": "sample question reintegration community violence reduction programme n gender role woman men different age group community n decision men woman make family community n within household carry task eg subsistencebreadwinning decision making income spending child care household chore n incentive economic opportunity different family member receives n expenditure men woman responsible n rigid gendered division labour n daily seasonal variation woman men labour supply n access control enabling asset productive resource eg land finance credit n access control human capital resource eg education knowledge time mobility n implication limited access control risk safety security access natural resource n constraint men woman different age group operate differ n especially vulnerable group term access natural resource eg woman without male relative internally displaced people femaleheaded household youth person disability n support need group eg legal aid awareness raising stigmatization protection barrier full participation group mitigated", "ProcessedSent": "n especially vulnerable group term access natural resource eg woman without male relative internally displaced people femaleheaded household youth person disability", "SentID": 12214 }, { "ParagraphID": 3339, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \\n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \\n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \\n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \\n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \\n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \\n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \\n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \\n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \\n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \\n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \\n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \\n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \\n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219882,14 +219882,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g.", + "Sentence": "\n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g.", "newParagraph": "sample question reintegration community violence reduction programme n gender role woman men different age group community n decision men woman make family community n within household carry task eg subsistencebreadwinning decision making income spending child care household chore n incentive economic opportunity different family member receives n expenditure men woman responsible n rigid gendered division labour n daily seasonal variation woman men labour supply n access control enabling asset productive resource eg land finance credit n access control human capital resource eg education knowledge time mobility n implication limited access control risk safety security access natural resource n constraint men woman different age group operate differ n especially vulnerable group term access natural resource eg woman without male relative internally displaced people femaleheaded household youth person disability n support need group eg legal aid awareness raising stigmatization protection barrier full participation group mitigated", "ProcessedSent": "n support need group eg", "SentID": 12215 }, { "ParagraphID": 3339, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \\n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \\n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \\n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \\n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \\n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \\n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \\n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \\n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \\n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \\n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \\n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \\n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \\n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219907,7 +219907,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3339, - "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \\n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \\n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \\n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \\n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \\n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \\n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \\n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \\n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \\n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \\n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \\n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \\n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \\n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", + "Paragraph": "Sample questions for reintegration and community violence reduction programmes: \n What are the gender roles of women and men of different age groups in the community? \n What decisions do men and women make in the family and community? \n Who within the household carries out which tasks (e.g. subsistence\/breadwinning, decision making over income spending, child care, household chores)? \n What are the incentives of economic opportunities for different family members and who receives them? \n Which expenditures are men and women responsible for? \n How rigid is the gendered division of labour? \n What are the daily and seasonal variations in women and men\u2019s labour supply? \n Who has access to and control over enabling assets for productive resources (e.g., land, finances, credit)? \n Who has access to and control over human capital resources (e.g., education, knowledge, time, mobility)? \n What are the implications for those with limited access or control? For those who risk their safety and security to access natural resources? \n How do constraints under which men and women of different age groups operate differ? \n Who are the especially vulnerable groups in terms of access to natural resources (e.g., women without male relatives, internally displaced people, female-headed households, youth, persons with disabilities)? \n What are the support needs of these groups (e.g. legal aid, awareness raising against stigmatization, protection)? How can barriers to the full participation of these groups be mitigated?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219925,7 +219925,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3340, - "Paragraph": "Second Report on protection of the environment in relation to armed conflicts of 2019 (A\/CN.4\/728) by Special Rapporteur Marja Lehto \\n The present report considers certain questions of the protection of the environment in non- international armed conflicts, with a focus on how the international rules and practices concerning natural resources may enhance the protection of the environment during and after such conflicts. It should be underlined here that the two questions considered\u2013 illegal exploitation of natural resources and unintended environmental effects of human displacement \u2013 are not exclusive to non-international armed conflicts. Nor do they provide a basis for a comprehensive consideration of environmental issues relating to non-international conflicts. At the same time, they are representative of problems that have been prevalent in current non-international armed conflicts and have caused severe stress to the environment. The present report will lay the basis for finalizing work on the topic by the International Law Commission, so that a complete set of draft principles together with the accompanying commentaries could be adopted.", + "Paragraph": "Second Report on protection of the environment in relation to armed conflicts of 2019 (A\/CN.4\/728) by Special Rapporteur Marja Lehto \n The present report considers certain questions of the protection of the environment in non- international armed conflicts, with a focus on how the international rules and practices concerning natural resources may enhance the protection of the environment during and after such conflicts. It should be underlined here that the two questions considered\u2013 illegal exploitation of natural resources and unintended environmental effects of human displacement \u2013 are not exclusive to non-international armed conflicts. Nor do they provide a basis for a comprehensive consideration of environmental issues relating to non-international conflicts. At the same time, they are representative of problems that have been prevalent in current non-international armed conflicts and have caused severe stress to the environment. The present report will lay the basis for finalizing work on the topic by the International Law Commission, so that a complete set of draft principles together with the accompanying commentaries could be adopted.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219936,14 +219936,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Second Report on protection of the environment in relation to armed conflicts of 2019 (A\/CN.4\/728) by Special Rapporteur Marja Lehto \\n The present report considers certain questions of the protection of the environment in non- international armed conflicts, with a focus on how the international rules and practices concerning natural resources may enhance the protection of the environment during and after such conflicts.", + "Sentence": "Second Report on protection of the environment in relation to armed conflicts of 2019 (A\/CN.4\/728) by Special Rapporteur Marja Lehto \n The present report considers certain questions of the protection of the environment in non- international armed conflicts, with a focus on how the international rules and practices concerning natural resources may enhance the protection of the environment during and after such conflicts.", "newParagraph": "second report protection environment relation armed conflict 2019 acn4728 special rapporteur marja lehto n present report considers certain question protection environment non international armed conflict focus international rule practice concerning natural resource may enhance protection environment conflict underlined two question considered illegal exploitation natural resource unintended environmental effect human displacement exclusive noninternational armed conflict provide basis comprehensive consideration environmental issue relating noninternational conflict time representative problem prevalent current noninternational armed conflict caused severe stress environment present report lay basis finalizing work topic international law commission complete set draft principle together accompanying commentary could adopted", "ProcessedSent": "second report protection environment relation armed conflict 2019 acn4728 special rapporteur marja lehto n present report considers certain question protection environment non international armed conflict focus international rule practice concerning natural resource may enhance protection environment conflict", "SentID": 12218 }, { "ParagraphID": 3340, - "Paragraph": "Second Report on protection of the environment in relation to armed conflicts of 2019 (A\/CN.4\/728) by Special Rapporteur Marja Lehto \\n The present report considers certain questions of the protection of the environment in non- international armed conflicts, with a focus on how the international rules and practices concerning natural resources may enhance the protection of the environment during and after such conflicts. It should be underlined here that the two questions considered\u2013 illegal exploitation of natural resources and unintended environmental effects of human displacement \u2013 are not exclusive to non-international armed conflicts. Nor do they provide a basis for a comprehensive consideration of environmental issues relating to non-international conflicts. At the same time, they are representative of problems that have been prevalent in current non-international armed conflicts and have caused severe stress to the environment. The present report will lay the basis for finalizing work on the topic by the International Law Commission, so that a complete set of draft principles together with the accompanying commentaries could be adopted.", + "Paragraph": "Second Report on protection of the environment in relation to armed conflicts of 2019 (A\/CN.4\/728) by Special Rapporteur Marja Lehto \n The present report considers certain questions of the protection of the environment in non- international armed conflicts, with a focus on how the international rules and practices concerning natural resources may enhance the protection of the environment during and after such conflicts. It should be underlined here that the two questions considered\u2013 illegal exploitation of natural resources and unintended environmental effects of human displacement \u2013 are not exclusive to non-international armed conflicts. Nor do they provide a basis for a comprehensive consideration of environmental issues relating to non-international conflicts. At the same time, they are representative of problems that have been prevalent in current non-international armed conflicts and have caused severe stress to the environment. The present report will lay the basis for finalizing work on the topic by the International Law Commission, so that a complete set of draft principles together with the accompanying commentaries could be adopted.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219961,7 +219961,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3340, - "Paragraph": "Second Report on protection of the environment in relation to armed conflicts of 2019 (A\/CN.4\/728) by Special Rapporteur Marja Lehto \\n The present report considers certain questions of the protection of the environment in non- international armed conflicts, with a focus on how the international rules and practices concerning natural resources may enhance the protection of the environment during and after such conflicts. It should be underlined here that the two questions considered\u2013 illegal exploitation of natural resources and unintended environmental effects of human displacement \u2013 are not exclusive to non-international armed conflicts. Nor do they provide a basis for a comprehensive consideration of environmental issues relating to non-international conflicts. At the same time, they are representative of problems that have been prevalent in current non-international armed conflicts and have caused severe stress to the environment. The present report will lay the basis for finalizing work on the topic by the International Law Commission, so that a complete set of draft principles together with the accompanying commentaries could be adopted.", + "Paragraph": "Second Report on protection of the environment in relation to armed conflicts of 2019 (A\/CN.4\/728) by Special Rapporteur Marja Lehto \n The present report considers certain questions of the protection of the environment in non- international armed conflicts, with a focus on how the international rules and practices concerning natural resources may enhance the protection of the environment during and after such conflicts. It should be underlined here that the two questions considered\u2013 illegal exploitation of natural resources and unintended environmental effects of human displacement \u2013 are not exclusive to non-international armed conflicts. Nor do they provide a basis for a comprehensive consideration of environmental issues relating to non-international conflicts. At the same time, they are representative of problems that have been prevalent in current non-international armed conflicts and have caused severe stress to the environment. The present report will lay the basis for finalizing work on the topic by the International Law Commission, so that a complete set of draft principles together with the accompanying commentaries could be adopted.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219979,7 +219979,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3340, - "Paragraph": "Second Report on protection of the environment in relation to armed conflicts of 2019 (A\/CN.4\/728) by Special Rapporteur Marja Lehto \\n The present report considers certain questions of the protection of the environment in non- international armed conflicts, with a focus on how the international rules and practices concerning natural resources may enhance the protection of the environment during and after such conflicts. It should be underlined here that the two questions considered\u2013 illegal exploitation of natural resources and unintended environmental effects of human displacement \u2013 are not exclusive to non-international armed conflicts. Nor do they provide a basis for a comprehensive consideration of environmental issues relating to non-international conflicts. At the same time, they are representative of problems that have been prevalent in current non-international armed conflicts and have caused severe stress to the environment. The present report will lay the basis for finalizing work on the topic by the International Law Commission, so that a complete set of draft principles together with the accompanying commentaries could be adopted.", + "Paragraph": "Second Report on protection of the environment in relation to armed conflicts of 2019 (A\/CN.4\/728) by Special Rapporteur Marja Lehto \n The present report considers certain questions of the protection of the environment in non- international armed conflicts, with a focus on how the international rules and practices concerning natural resources may enhance the protection of the environment during and after such conflicts. It should be underlined here that the two questions considered\u2013 illegal exploitation of natural resources and unintended environmental effects of human displacement \u2013 are not exclusive to non-international armed conflicts. Nor do they provide a basis for a comprehensive consideration of environmental issues relating to non-international conflicts. At the same time, they are representative of problems that have been prevalent in current non-international armed conflicts and have caused severe stress to the environment. The present report will lay the basis for finalizing work on the topic by the International Law Commission, so that a complete set of draft principles together with the accompanying commentaries could be adopted.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -219997,7 +219997,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3340, - "Paragraph": "Second Report on protection of the environment in relation to armed conflicts of 2019 (A\/CN.4\/728) by Special Rapporteur Marja Lehto \\n The present report considers certain questions of the protection of the environment in non- international armed conflicts, with a focus on how the international rules and practices concerning natural resources may enhance the protection of the environment during and after such conflicts. It should be underlined here that the two questions considered\u2013 illegal exploitation of natural resources and unintended environmental effects of human displacement \u2013 are not exclusive to non-international armed conflicts. Nor do they provide a basis for a comprehensive consideration of environmental issues relating to non-international conflicts. At the same time, they are representative of problems that have been prevalent in current non-international armed conflicts and have caused severe stress to the environment. The present report will lay the basis for finalizing work on the topic by the International Law Commission, so that a complete set of draft principles together with the accompanying commentaries could be adopted.", + "Paragraph": "Second Report on protection of the environment in relation to armed conflicts of 2019 (A\/CN.4\/728) by Special Rapporteur Marja Lehto \n The present report considers certain questions of the protection of the environment in non- international armed conflicts, with a focus on how the international rules and practices concerning natural resources may enhance the protection of the environment during and after such conflicts. It should be underlined here that the two questions considered\u2013 illegal exploitation of natural resources and unintended environmental effects of human displacement \u2013 are not exclusive to non-international armed conflicts. Nor do they provide a basis for a comprehensive consideration of environmental issues relating to non-international conflicts. At the same time, they are representative of problems that have been prevalent in current non-international armed conflicts and have caused severe stress to the environment. The present report will lay the basis for finalizing work on the topic by the International Law Commission, so that a complete set of draft principles together with the accompanying commentaries could be adopted.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220015,7 +220015,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3341, - "Paragraph": "The Sustaining Peace Approach and twin resolutions on the review of the UN Peacebuilding Architecture of 2018 (GA resolution 70\/262 and SC resolution 2282 (2016)) \\n The concept of \u2018Sustaining Peace\u2019 has emerged as a new and comprehensive approach to preventing the outbreak, continuation and recurrence of conflict. It marks a clear break from the past where efforts to build peace were perceived to be mainly restricted to post-conflict contexts. The concept, framed by the twin sustaining peace resolutions and the United Nations (UN) Secretary General Report on peacebuilding and sustaining peace, recognises that a comprehensive approach is required across the peace continuum, from conflict prevention, through peace-making, peacekeeping and longer-term development. It therefore necessitates an 'integrated and coherent approach among relevant political, security and developmental actors, within and outside of the United Nations system.", + "Paragraph": "The Sustaining Peace Approach and twin resolutions on the review of the UN Peacebuilding Architecture of 2018 (GA resolution 70\/262 and SC resolution 2282 (2016)) \n The concept of \u2018Sustaining Peace\u2019 has emerged as a new and comprehensive approach to preventing the outbreak, continuation and recurrence of conflict. It marks a clear break from the past where efforts to build peace were perceived to be mainly restricted to post-conflict contexts. The concept, framed by the twin sustaining peace resolutions and the United Nations (UN) Secretary General Report on peacebuilding and sustaining peace, recognises that a comprehensive approach is required across the peace continuum, from conflict prevention, through peace-making, peacekeeping and longer-term development. It therefore necessitates an 'integrated and coherent approach among relevant political, security and developmental actors, within and outside of the United Nations system.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220026,14 +220026,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "The Sustaining Peace Approach and twin resolutions on the review of the UN Peacebuilding Architecture of 2018 (GA resolution 70\/262 and SC resolution 2282 (2016)) \\n The concept of \u2018Sustaining Peace\u2019 has emerged as a new and comprehensive approach to preventing the outbreak, continuation and recurrence of conflict.", + "Sentence": "The Sustaining Peace Approach and twin resolutions on the review of the UN Peacebuilding Architecture of 2018 (GA resolution 70\/262 and SC resolution 2282 (2016)) \n The concept of \u2018Sustaining Peace\u2019 has emerged as a new and comprehensive approach to preventing the outbreak, continuation and recurrence of conflict.", "newParagraph": "sustaining peace approach twin resolution review un peacebuilding architecture 2018 ga resolution 70262 sc resolution 2282 2016 n concept sustaining peace emerged new comprehensive approach preventing outbreak continuation recurrence conflict mark clear break past effort build peace perceived mainly restricted postconflict context concept framed twin sustaining peace resolution united nation un secretary general report peacebuilding sustaining peace recognises comprehensive approach required across peace continuum conflict prevention peacemaking peacekeeping longerterm development therefore necessitates integrated coherent approach among relevant political security developmental actor within outside united nation system", "ProcessedSent": "sustaining peace approach twin resolution review un peacebuilding architecture 2018 ga resolution 70262 sc resolution 2282 2016 n concept sustaining peace emerged new comprehensive approach preventing outbreak continuation recurrence conflict", "SentID": 12223 }, { "ParagraphID": 3341, - "Paragraph": "The Sustaining Peace Approach and twin resolutions on the review of the UN Peacebuilding Architecture of 2018 (GA resolution 70\/262 and SC resolution 2282 (2016)) \\n The concept of \u2018Sustaining Peace\u2019 has emerged as a new and comprehensive approach to preventing the outbreak, continuation and recurrence of conflict. It marks a clear break from the past where efforts to build peace were perceived to be mainly restricted to post-conflict contexts. The concept, framed by the twin sustaining peace resolutions and the United Nations (UN) Secretary General Report on peacebuilding and sustaining peace, recognises that a comprehensive approach is required across the peace continuum, from conflict prevention, through peace-making, peacekeeping and longer-term development. It therefore necessitates an 'integrated and coherent approach among relevant political, security and developmental actors, within and outside of the United Nations system.", + "Paragraph": "The Sustaining Peace Approach and twin resolutions on the review of the UN Peacebuilding Architecture of 2018 (GA resolution 70\/262 and SC resolution 2282 (2016)) \n The concept of \u2018Sustaining Peace\u2019 has emerged as a new and comprehensive approach to preventing the outbreak, continuation and recurrence of conflict. It marks a clear break from the past where efforts to build peace were perceived to be mainly restricted to post-conflict contexts. The concept, framed by the twin sustaining peace resolutions and the United Nations (UN) Secretary General Report on peacebuilding and sustaining peace, recognises that a comprehensive approach is required across the peace continuum, from conflict prevention, through peace-making, peacekeeping and longer-term development. It therefore necessitates an 'integrated and coherent approach among relevant political, security and developmental actors, within and outside of the United Nations system.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220051,7 +220051,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3341, - "Paragraph": "The Sustaining Peace Approach and twin resolutions on the review of the UN Peacebuilding Architecture of 2018 (GA resolution 70\/262 and SC resolution 2282 (2016)) \\n The concept of \u2018Sustaining Peace\u2019 has emerged as a new and comprehensive approach to preventing the outbreak, continuation and recurrence of conflict. It marks a clear break from the past where efforts to build peace were perceived to be mainly restricted to post-conflict contexts. The concept, framed by the twin sustaining peace resolutions and the United Nations (UN) Secretary General Report on peacebuilding and sustaining peace, recognises that a comprehensive approach is required across the peace continuum, from conflict prevention, through peace-making, peacekeeping and longer-term development. It therefore necessitates an 'integrated and coherent approach among relevant political, security and developmental actors, within and outside of the United Nations system.", + "Paragraph": "The Sustaining Peace Approach and twin resolutions on the review of the UN Peacebuilding Architecture of 2018 (GA resolution 70\/262 and SC resolution 2282 (2016)) \n The concept of \u2018Sustaining Peace\u2019 has emerged as a new and comprehensive approach to preventing the outbreak, continuation and recurrence of conflict. It marks a clear break from the past where efforts to build peace were perceived to be mainly restricted to post-conflict contexts. The concept, framed by the twin sustaining peace resolutions and the United Nations (UN) Secretary General Report on peacebuilding and sustaining peace, recognises that a comprehensive approach is required across the peace continuum, from conflict prevention, through peace-making, peacekeeping and longer-term development. It therefore necessitates an 'integrated and coherent approach among relevant political, security and developmental actors, within and outside of the United Nations system.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220069,7 +220069,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3341, - "Paragraph": "The Sustaining Peace Approach and twin resolutions on the review of the UN Peacebuilding Architecture of 2018 (GA resolution 70\/262 and SC resolution 2282 (2016)) \\n The concept of \u2018Sustaining Peace\u2019 has emerged as a new and comprehensive approach to preventing the outbreak, continuation and recurrence of conflict. It marks a clear break from the past where efforts to build peace were perceived to be mainly restricted to post-conflict contexts. The concept, framed by the twin sustaining peace resolutions and the United Nations (UN) Secretary General Report on peacebuilding and sustaining peace, recognises that a comprehensive approach is required across the peace continuum, from conflict prevention, through peace-making, peacekeeping and longer-term development. It therefore necessitates an 'integrated and coherent approach among relevant political, security and developmental actors, within and outside of the United Nations system.", + "Paragraph": "The Sustaining Peace Approach and twin resolutions on the review of the UN Peacebuilding Architecture of 2018 (GA resolution 70\/262 and SC resolution 2282 (2016)) \n The concept of \u2018Sustaining Peace\u2019 has emerged as a new and comprehensive approach to preventing the outbreak, continuation and recurrence of conflict. It marks a clear break from the past where efforts to build peace were perceived to be mainly restricted to post-conflict contexts. The concept, framed by the twin sustaining peace resolutions and the United Nations (UN) Secretary General Report on peacebuilding and sustaining peace, recognises that a comprehensive approach is required across the peace continuum, from conflict prevention, through peace-making, peacekeeping and longer-term development. It therefore necessitates an 'integrated and coherent approach among relevant political, security and developmental actors, within and outside of the United Nations system.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220087,7 +220087,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3342, - "Paragraph": "SG Action for Peacekeeping (A4P) initiative and Declaration of Shared Commitments (2018) \\n\\n Through his Action for Peacekeeping (A4P) initiative, the Secretary-General called on Member States, the Security Council, host countries, troop- and police- contributing countries, regional partners and financial contributors to renew our collective engagement with UN peacekeeping and mutually commit to reach for excellence. The Declaration commitments focus on a set of key priorities that build on both new commitments and existing workstreams. Implementation goals are centered on eight priority commitment areas: \\n politics \\n women, peace and security \\n protection \\n safety and security \\n performance and accountability \\n peacebuilding and sustaining peace \\n partnerships \\n conduct of peacekeepers and peacekeeping operations", + "Paragraph": "SG Action for Peacekeeping (A4P) initiative and Declaration of Shared Commitments (2018) \n\n Through his Action for Peacekeeping (A4P) initiative, the Secretary-General called on Member States, the Security Council, host countries, troop- and police- contributing countries, regional partners and financial contributors to renew our collective engagement with UN peacekeeping and mutually commit to reach for excellence. The Declaration commitments focus on a set of key priorities that build on both new commitments and existing workstreams. Implementation goals are centered on eight priority commitment areas: \n politics \n women, peace and security \n protection \n safety and security \n performance and accountability \n peacebuilding and sustaining peace \n partnerships \n conduct of peacekeepers and peacekeeping operations", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220098,14 +220098,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "SG Action for Peacekeeping (A4P) initiative and Declaration of Shared Commitments (2018) \\n\\n Through his Action for Peacekeeping (A4P) initiative, the Secretary-General called on Member States, the Security Council, host countries, troop- and police- contributing countries, regional partners and financial contributors to renew our collective engagement with UN peacekeeping and mutually commit to reach for excellence.", + "Sentence": "SG Action for Peacekeeping (A4P) initiative and Declaration of Shared Commitments (2018) \n\n Through his Action for Peacekeeping (A4P) initiative, the Secretary-General called on Member States, the Security Council, host countries, troop- and police- contributing countries, regional partners and financial contributors to renew our collective engagement with UN peacekeeping and mutually commit to reach for excellence.", "newParagraph": "sg action peacekeeping a4p initiative declaration shared commitment 2018 nn action peacekeeping a4p initiative secretarygeneral called member state security council host country troop police contributing country regional partner financial contributor renew collective engagement un peacekeeping mutually commit reach excellence declaration commitment focus set key priority build new commitment existing workstreams implementation goal centered eight priority commitment area n politics n woman peace security n protection n safety security n performance accountability n peacebuilding sustaining peace n partnership n conduct peacekeeper peacekeeping operation", "ProcessedSent": "sg action peacekeeping a4p initiative declaration shared commitment 2018 nn action peacekeeping a4p initiative secretarygeneral called member state security council host country troop police contributing country regional partner financial contributor renew collective engagement un peacekeeping mutually commit reach excellence", "SentID": 12227 }, { "ParagraphID": 3342, - "Paragraph": "SG Action for Peacekeeping (A4P) initiative and Declaration of Shared Commitments (2018) \\n\\n Through his Action for Peacekeeping (A4P) initiative, the Secretary-General called on Member States, the Security Council, host countries, troop- and police- contributing countries, regional partners and financial contributors to renew our collective engagement with UN peacekeeping and mutually commit to reach for excellence. The Declaration commitments focus on a set of key priorities that build on both new commitments and existing workstreams. Implementation goals are centered on eight priority commitment areas: \\n politics \\n women, peace and security \\n protection \\n safety and security \\n performance and accountability \\n peacebuilding and sustaining peace \\n partnerships \\n conduct of peacekeepers and peacekeeping operations", + "Paragraph": "SG Action for Peacekeeping (A4P) initiative and Declaration of Shared Commitments (2018) \n\n Through his Action for Peacekeeping (A4P) initiative, the Secretary-General called on Member States, the Security Council, host countries, troop- and police- contributing countries, regional partners and financial contributors to renew our collective engagement with UN peacekeeping and mutually commit to reach for excellence. The Declaration commitments focus on a set of key priorities that build on both new commitments and existing workstreams. Implementation goals are centered on eight priority commitment areas: \n politics \n women, peace and security \n protection \n safety and security \n performance and accountability \n peacebuilding and sustaining peace \n partnerships \n conduct of peacekeepers and peacekeeping operations", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220123,7 +220123,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3342, - "Paragraph": "SG Action for Peacekeeping (A4P) initiative and Declaration of Shared Commitments (2018) \\n\\n Through his Action for Peacekeeping (A4P) initiative, the Secretary-General called on Member States, the Security Council, host countries, troop- and police- contributing countries, regional partners and financial contributors to renew our collective engagement with UN peacekeeping and mutually commit to reach for excellence. The Declaration commitments focus on a set of key priorities that build on both new commitments and existing workstreams. Implementation goals are centered on eight priority commitment areas: \\n politics \\n women, peace and security \\n protection \\n safety and security \\n performance and accountability \\n peacebuilding and sustaining peace \\n partnerships \\n conduct of peacekeepers and peacekeeping operations", + "Paragraph": "SG Action for Peacekeeping (A4P) initiative and Declaration of Shared Commitments (2018) \n\n Through his Action for Peacekeeping (A4P) initiative, the Secretary-General called on Member States, the Security Council, host countries, troop- and police- contributing countries, regional partners and financial contributors to renew our collective engagement with UN peacekeeping and mutually commit to reach for excellence. The Declaration commitments focus on a set of key priorities that build on both new commitments and existing workstreams. Implementation goals are centered on eight priority commitment areas: \n politics \n women, peace and security \n protection \n safety and security \n performance and accountability \n peacebuilding and sustaining peace \n partnerships \n conduct of peacekeepers and peacekeeping operations", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220134,14 +220134,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Implementation goals are centered on eight priority commitment areas: \\n politics \\n women, peace and security \\n protection \\n safety and security \\n performance and accountability \\n peacebuilding and sustaining peace \\n partnerships \\n conduct of peacekeepers and peacekeeping operations", + "Sentence": "Implementation goals are centered on eight priority commitment areas: \n politics \n women, peace and security \n protection \n safety and security \n performance and accountability \n peacebuilding and sustaining peace \n partnerships \n conduct of peacekeepers and peacekeeping operations", "newParagraph": "sg action peacekeeping a4p initiative declaration shared commitment 2018 nn action peacekeeping a4p initiative secretarygeneral called member state security council host country troop police contributing country regional partner financial contributor renew collective engagement un peacekeeping mutually commit reach excellence declaration commitment focus set key priority build new commitment existing workstreams implementation goal centered eight priority commitment area n politics n woman peace security n protection n safety security n performance accountability n peacebuilding sustaining peace n partnership n conduct peacekeeper peacekeeping operation", "ProcessedSent": "implementation goal centered eight priority commitment area n politics n woman peace security n protection n safety security n performance accountability n peacebuilding sustaining peace n partnership n conduct peacekeeper peacekeeping operation", "SentID": 12229 }, { "ParagraphID": 3343, - "Paragraph": "2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) \\n The SDGs include elements that pertain to DDR, gender and natural resources. A comprehensive approach to achieving them requires humanitarian and development practitioners, including those working in DDR processes, to take into account each of these goals when planning and designing interventions. _____ Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cWomen\u2019s participation in peacebuilding\u201d of 7 September 2010 (A\/65\/354 - S\/2010\/466) \\n The report calls on all peacebuilding actors to \u201censure gender-responsive economic recovery\u201d through \u201cthe promotion of women as \u2018front-line\u2019 service-delivery agents,\u201d including in the areas of \u201cagricultural extension and natural resource management.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) \n The SDGs include elements that pertain to DDR, gender and natural resources. A comprehensive approach to achieving them requires humanitarian and development practitioners, including those working in DDR processes, to take into account each of these goals when planning and designing interventions. _____ Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cWomen\u2019s participation in peacebuilding\u201d of 7 September 2010 (A\/65\/354 - S\/2010\/466) \n The report calls on all peacebuilding actors to \u201censure gender-responsive economic recovery\u201d through \u201cthe promotion of women as \u2018front-line\u2019 service-delivery agents,\u201d including in the areas of \u201cagricultural extension and natural resource management.\u201d", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220152,14 +220152,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) \\n The SDGs include elements that pertain to DDR, gender and natural resources.", + "Sentence": "2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) \n The SDGs include elements that pertain to DDR, gender and natural resources.", "newParagraph": "2030 agenda sustainable development sustainable development goal sdgs n sdgs include element pertain ddr gender natural resource comprehensive approach achieving requires humanitarian development practitioner including working ddr process take account goal planning designing intervention report secretarygeneral woman participation peacebuilding 7 september 2010 a65354 s2010466 n report call peacebuilding actor ensure genderresponsive economic recovery promotion woman frontline servicedelivery agent including area agricultural extension natural resource management ", "ProcessedSent": "2030 agenda sustainable development sustainable development goal sdgs n sdgs include element pertain ddr gender natural resource", "SentID": 12230 }, { "ParagraphID": 3343, - "Paragraph": "2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) \\n The SDGs include elements that pertain to DDR, gender and natural resources. A comprehensive approach to achieving them requires humanitarian and development practitioners, including those working in DDR processes, to take into account each of these goals when planning and designing interventions. _____ Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cWomen\u2019s participation in peacebuilding\u201d of 7 September 2010 (A\/65\/354 - S\/2010\/466) \\n The report calls on all peacebuilding actors to \u201censure gender-responsive economic recovery\u201d through \u201cthe promotion of women as \u2018front-line\u2019 service-delivery agents,\u201d including in the areas of \u201cagricultural extension and natural resource management.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) \n The SDGs include elements that pertain to DDR, gender and natural resources. A comprehensive approach to achieving them requires humanitarian and development practitioners, including those working in DDR processes, to take into account each of these goals when planning and designing interventions. _____ Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cWomen\u2019s participation in peacebuilding\u201d of 7 September 2010 (A\/65\/354 - S\/2010\/466) \n The report calls on all peacebuilding actors to \u201censure gender-responsive economic recovery\u201d through \u201cthe promotion of women as \u2018front-line\u2019 service-delivery agents,\u201d including in the areas of \u201cagricultural extension and natural resource management.\u201d", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220177,7 +220177,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3343, - "Paragraph": "2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) \\n The SDGs include elements that pertain to DDR, gender and natural resources. A comprehensive approach to achieving them requires humanitarian and development practitioners, including those working in DDR processes, to take into account each of these goals when planning and designing interventions. _____ Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cWomen\u2019s participation in peacebuilding\u201d of 7 September 2010 (A\/65\/354 - S\/2010\/466) \\n The report calls on all peacebuilding actors to \u201censure gender-responsive economic recovery\u201d through \u201cthe promotion of women as \u2018front-line\u2019 service-delivery agents,\u201d including in the areas of \u201cagricultural extension and natural resource management.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) \n The SDGs include elements that pertain to DDR, gender and natural resources. A comprehensive approach to achieving them requires humanitarian and development practitioners, including those working in DDR processes, to take into account each of these goals when planning and designing interventions. _____ Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cWomen\u2019s participation in peacebuilding\u201d of 7 September 2010 (A\/65\/354 - S\/2010\/466) \n The report calls on all peacebuilding actors to \u201censure gender-responsive economic recovery\u201d through \u201cthe promotion of women as \u2018front-line\u2019 service-delivery agents,\u201d including in the areas of \u201cagricultural extension and natural resource management.\u201d", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220188,14 +220188,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "_____ Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cWomen\u2019s participation in peacebuilding\u201d of 7 September 2010 (A\/65\/354 - S\/2010\/466) \\n The report calls on all peacebuilding actors to \u201censure gender-responsive economic recovery\u201d through \u201cthe promotion of women as \u2018front-line\u2019 service-delivery agents,\u201d including in the areas of \u201cagricultural extension and natural resource management.\u201d", + "Sentence": "_____ Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cWomen\u2019s participation in peacebuilding\u201d of 7 September 2010 (A\/65\/354 - S\/2010\/466) \n The report calls on all peacebuilding actors to \u201censure gender-responsive economic recovery\u201d through \u201cthe promotion of women as \u2018front-line\u2019 service-delivery agents,\u201d including in the areas of \u201cagricultural extension and natural resource management.\u201d", "newParagraph": "2030 agenda sustainable development sustainable development goal sdgs n sdgs include element pertain ddr gender natural resource comprehensive approach achieving requires humanitarian development practitioner including working ddr process take account goal planning designing intervention report secretarygeneral woman participation peacebuilding 7 september 2010 a65354 s2010466 n report call peacebuilding actor ensure genderresponsive economic recovery promotion woman frontline servicedelivery agent including area agricultural extension natural resource management ", "ProcessedSent": " report secretarygeneral woman participation peacebuilding 7 september 2010 a65354 s2010466 n report call peacebuilding actor ensure genderresponsive economic recovery promotion woman frontline servicedelivery agent including area agricultural extension natural resource management ", "SentID": 12232 }, { "ParagraphID": 3344, - "Paragraph": "Third Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration\u201d of 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741) \\n The 2011 Report of the Secretary-General on DDR identifies trafficking in natural resources as a \u201ckey regional issue affecting the reintegration of ex-combatants,\u201d and specifically refers to natural resource management as an emerging issue that can contribute to the sustainability of reintegration programmes if properly addressed.", + "Paragraph": "Third Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration\u201d of 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741) \n The 2011 Report of the Secretary-General on DDR identifies trafficking in natural resources as a \u201ckey regional issue affecting the reintegration of ex-combatants,\u201d and specifically refers to natural resource management as an emerging issue that can contribute to the sustainability of reintegration programmes if properly addressed.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220206,14 +220206,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Third Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration\u201d of 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741) \\n The 2011 Report of the Secretary-General on DDR identifies trafficking in natural resources as a \u201ckey regional issue affecting the reintegration of ex-combatants,\u201d and specifically refers to natural resource management as an emerging issue that can contribute to the sustainability of reintegration programmes if properly addressed.", + "Sentence": "Third Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cDisarmament, demobilization and reintegration\u201d of 21 March 2011 (A\/65\/741) \n The 2011 Report of the Secretary-General on DDR identifies trafficking in natural resources as a \u201ckey regional issue affecting the reintegration of ex-combatants,\u201d and specifically refers to natural resource management as an emerging issue that can contribute to the sustainability of reintegration programmes if properly addressed.", "newParagraph": "third report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration 21 march 2011 a65741 n 2011 report secretarygeneral ddr identifies trafficking natural resource key regional issue affecting reintegration excombatants specifically refers natural resource management emerging issue contribute sustainability reintegration programme properly addressed", "ProcessedSent": "third report secretarygeneral disarmament demobilization reintegration 21 march 2011 a65741 n 2011 report secretarygeneral ddr identifies trafficking natural resource key regional issue affecting reintegration excombatants specifically refers natural resource management emerging issue contribute sustainability reintegration programme properly addressed", "SentID": 12233 }, { "ParagraphID": 3345, - "Paragraph": "Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on \u201cObservance of environmental norms in the drafting and implementation of agreements on disarmament and arms control\u201d of 13 January 2011 (A\/RES\/65\/53) \\n This General Assembly resolution underlines \u201cthe importance of the observance of environmental norms in the preparation and implementation of disarmament and arms limitation agreements\u201d and reaffirms that the international community should contribute to ensuring compliance with relevant environmental norms in negotiating treaties and agreements on disarmament and arms limitation. It further calls on \u201call States to adopt unilateral, bilateral, regional and multilateral measures so as to contribute to ensuring the application of scientific and technological progress within the framework of international security, disarmament and other related spheres, without detriment to the environment or to its effective contribution to attaining sustainable development.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on \u201cObservance of environmental norms in the drafting and implementation of agreements on disarmament and arms control\u201d of 13 January 2011 (A\/RES\/65\/53) \n This General Assembly resolution underlines \u201cthe importance of the observance of environmental norms in the preparation and implementation of disarmament and arms limitation agreements\u201d and reaffirms that the international community should contribute to ensuring compliance with relevant environmental norms in negotiating treaties and agreements on disarmament and arms limitation. It further calls on \u201call States to adopt unilateral, bilateral, regional and multilateral measures so as to contribute to ensuring the application of scientific and technological progress within the framework of international security, disarmament and other related spheres, without detriment to the environment or to its effective contribution to attaining sustainable development.\u201d", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220224,14 +220224,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on \u201cObservance of environmental norms in the drafting and implementation of agreements on disarmament and arms control\u201d of 13 January 2011 (A\/RES\/65\/53) \\n This General Assembly resolution underlines \u201cthe importance of the observance of environmental norms in the preparation and implementation of disarmament and arms limitation agreements\u201d and reaffirms that the international community should contribute to ensuring compliance with relevant environmental norms in negotiating treaties and agreements on disarmament and arms limitation.", + "Sentence": "Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on \u201cObservance of environmental norms in the drafting and implementation of agreements on disarmament and arms control\u201d of 13 January 2011 (A\/RES\/65\/53) \n This General Assembly resolution underlines \u201cthe importance of the observance of environmental norms in the preparation and implementation of disarmament and arms limitation agreements\u201d and reaffirms that the international community should contribute to ensuring compliance with relevant environmental norms in negotiating treaties and agreements on disarmament and arms limitation.", "newParagraph": "resolution adopted general assembly observance environmental norm drafting implementation agreement disarmament arm control 13 january 2011 ares6553 n general assembly resolution underline importance observance environmental norm preparation implementation disarmament arm limitation agreement reaffirms international community contribute ensuring compliance relevant environmental norm negotiating treaty agreement disarmament arm limitation call state adopt unilateral bilateral regional multilateral measure contribute ensuring application scientific technological progress within framework international security disarmament related sphere without detriment environment effective contribution attaining sustainable development ", "ProcessedSent": "resolution adopted general assembly observance environmental norm drafting implementation agreement disarmament arm control 13 january 2011 ares6553 n general assembly resolution underline importance observance environmental norm preparation implementation disarmament arm limitation agreement reaffirms international community contribute ensuring compliance relevant environmental norm negotiating treaty agreement disarmament arm limitation", "SentID": 12234 }, { "ParagraphID": 3345, - "Paragraph": "Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on \u201cObservance of environmental norms in the drafting and implementation of agreements on disarmament and arms control\u201d of 13 January 2011 (A\/RES\/65\/53) \\n This General Assembly resolution underlines \u201cthe importance of the observance of environmental norms in the preparation and implementation of disarmament and arms limitation agreements\u201d and reaffirms that the international community should contribute to ensuring compliance with relevant environmental norms in negotiating treaties and agreements on disarmament and arms limitation. It further calls on \u201call States to adopt unilateral, bilateral, regional and multilateral measures so as to contribute to ensuring the application of scientific and technological progress within the framework of international security, disarmament and other related spheres, without detriment to the environment or to its effective contribution to attaining sustainable development.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on \u201cObservance of environmental norms in the drafting and implementation of agreements on disarmament and arms control\u201d of 13 January 2011 (A\/RES\/65\/53) \n This General Assembly resolution underlines \u201cthe importance of the observance of environmental norms in the preparation and implementation of disarmament and arms limitation agreements\u201d and reaffirms that the international community should contribute to ensuring compliance with relevant environmental norms in negotiating treaties and agreements on disarmament and arms limitation. It further calls on \u201call States to adopt unilateral, bilateral, regional and multilateral measures so as to contribute to ensuring the application of scientific and technological progress within the framework of international security, disarmament and other related spheres, without detriment to the environment or to its effective contribution to attaining sustainable development.\u201d", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220249,7 +220249,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3346, - "Paragraph": "Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cPeacebuilding in the immediate aftermath of conflict\u201d of 16 July 2010 (A\/64\/866\u2013S\/2010\/386) \\n In this report, the Secretary-General notes that \u201cgreater efforts will be needed to deliver a more effective United Nations response\u201d in the area of natural resources, and he \u201ccall[s] on Member States and the United Nations system to make questions of natural resource allocation, ownership and access an integral part of peacebuilding strategies.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cPeacebuilding in the immediate aftermath of conflict\u201d of 16 July 2010 (A\/64\/866\u2013S\/2010\/386) \n In this report, the Secretary-General notes that \u201cgreater efforts will be needed to deliver a more effective United Nations response\u201d in the area of natural resources, and he \u201ccall[s] on Member States and the United Nations system to make questions of natural resource allocation, ownership and access an integral part of peacebuilding strategies.\u201d", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220260,14 +220260,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cPeacebuilding in the immediate aftermath of conflict\u201d of 16 July 2010 (A\/64\/866\u2013S\/2010\/386) \\n In this report, the Secretary-General notes that \u201cgreater efforts will be needed to deliver a more effective United Nations response\u201d in the area of natural resources, and he \u201ccall[s] on Member States and the United Nations system to make questions of natural resource allocation, ownership and access an integral part of peacebuilding strategies.\u201d", + "Sentence": "Report of the Secretary-General on \u201cPeacebuilding in the immediate aftermath of conflict\u201d of 16 July 2010 (A\/64\/866\u2013S\/2010\/386) \n In this report, the Secretary-General notes that \u201cgreater efforts will be needed to deliver a more effective United Nations response\u201d in the area of natural resources, and he \u201ccall[s] on Member States and the United Nations system to make questions of natural resource allocation, ownership and access an integral part of peacebuilding strategies.\u201d", "newParagraph": "report secretarygeneral peacebuilding immediate aftermath conflict 16 july 2010 a64866 s2010386 n report secretarygeneral note greater effort needed deliver effective united nation response area natural resource call member state united nation system make question natural resource allocation ownership access integral part peacebuilding strategy ", "ProcessedSent": "report secretarygeneral peacebuilding immediate aftermath conflict 16 july 2010 a64866 s2010386 n report secretarygeneral note greater effort needed deliver effective united nation response area natural resource call member state united nation system make question natural resource allocation ownership access integral part peacebuilding strategy ", "SentID": 12236 }, { "ParagraphID": 3347, - "Paragraph": "United Nations Policy for Post-Conflict Employment Creation, Income Generation and Reintegration (2009) \\n The Policy notes the importance of addressing \u201croot causes of conflict such as inequitable access to land and natural resources\u201d through the use of \u201cfiscal and redistributive incentives to minimize social tensions\u201d during the reintegration process. It further suggests: \\n diversifying away from natural resource exports by expanding labour-intensive exports and tourism; \\n implementing cash-for-work projects in relevant agricultural and natural resource sectors in rural areas; \\n engaging traditional authorities in dispute resolution, particularly with regard to access to property and other natural resources (such as forestry, fishing and grazing land); and \\n implementing labour-intensive infrastructure programmes to promote sustainable agriculture, including restoration of the natural resource base, while simultaneously emphasizing social acceptance and community participation. ", + "Paragraph": "United Nations Policy for Post-Conflict Employment Creation, Income Generation and Reintegration (2009) \n The Policy notes the importance of addressing \u201croot causes of conflict such as inequitable access to land and natural resources\u201d through the use of \u201cfiscal and redistributive incentives to minimize social tensions\u201d during the reintegration process. It further suggests: \n diversifying away from natural resource exports by expanding labour-intensive exports and tourism; \n implementing cash-for-work projects in relevant agricultural and natural resource sectors in rural areas; \n engaging traditional authorities in dispute resolution, particularly with regard to access to property and other natural resources (such as forestry, fishing and grazing land); and \n implementing labour-intensive infrastructure programmes to promote sustainable agriculture, including restoration of the natural resource base, while simultaneously emphasizing social acceptance and community participation. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220278,14 +220278,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "United Nations Policy for Post-Conflict Employment Creation, Income Generation and Reintegration (2009) \\n The Policy notes the importance of addressing \u201croot causes of conflict such as inequitable access to land and natural resources\u201d through the use of \u201cfiscal and redistributive incentives to minimize social tensions\u201d during the reintegration process.", + "Sentence": "United Nations Policy for Post-Conflict Employment Creation, Income Generation and Reintegration (2009) \n The Policy notes the importance of addressing \u201croot causes of conflict such as inequitable access to land and natural resources\u201d through the use of \u201cfiscal and redistributive incentives to minimize social tensions\u201d during the reintegration process.", "newParagraph": "united nation policy postconflict employment creation income generation reintegration 2009 n policy note importance addressing root cause conflict inequitable access land natural resource use fiscal redistributive incentive minimize social tension reintegration process suggests n diversifying away natural resource export expanding labourintensive export tourism n implementing cashforwork project relevant agricultural natural resource sector rural area n engaging traditional authority dispute resolution particularly regard access property natural resource forestry fishing grazing land n implementing labourintensive infrastructure programme promote sustainable agriculture including restoration natural resource base simultaneously emphasizing social acceptance community participation ", "ProcessedSent": "united nation policy postconflict employment creation income generation reintegration 2009 n policy note importance addressing root cause conflict inequitable access land natural resource use fiscal redistributive incentive minimize social tension reintegration process", "SentID": 12237 }, { "ParagraphID": 3347, - "Paragraph": "United Nations Policy for Post-Conflict Employment Creation, Income Generation and Reintegration (2009) \\n The Policy notes the importance of addressing \u201croot causes of conflict such as inequitable access to land and natural resources\u201d through the use of \u201cfiscal and redistributive incentives to minimize social tensions\u201d during the reintegration process. It further suggests: \\n diversifying away from natural resource exports by expanding labour-intensive exports and tourism; \\n implementing cash-for-work projects in relevant agricultural and natural resource sectors in rural areas; \\n engaging traditional authorities in dispute resolution, particularly with regard to access to property and other natural resources (such as forestry, fishing and grazing land); and \\n implementing labour-intensive infrastructure programmes to promote sustainable agriculture, including restoration of the natural resource base, while simultaneously emphasizing social acceptance and community participation. ", + "Paragraph": "United Nations Policy for Post-Conflict Employment Creation, Income Generation and Reintegration (2009) \n The Policy notes the importance of addressing \u201croot causes of conflict such as inequitable access to land and natural resources\u201d through the use of \u201cfiscal and redistributive incentives to minimize social tensions\u201d during the reintegration process. It further suggests: \n diversifying away from natural resource exports by expanding labour-intensive exports and tourism; \n implementing cash-for-work projects in relevant agricultural and natural resource sectors in rural areas; \n engaging traditional authorities in dispute resolution, particularly with regard to access to property and other natural resources (such as forestry, fishing and grazing land); and \n implementing labour-intensive infrastructure programmes to promote sustainable agriculture, including restoration of the natural resource base, while simultaneously emphasizing social acceptance and community participation. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220296,14 +220296,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "It further suggests: \\n diversifying away from natural resource exports by expanding labour-intensive exports and tourism; \\n implementing cash-for-work projects in relevant agricultural and natural resource sectors in rural areas; \\n engaging traditional authorities in dispute resolution, particularly with regard to access to property and other natural resources (such as forestry, fishing and grazing land); and \\n implementing labour-intensive infrastructure programmes to promote sustainable agriculture, including restoration of the natural resource base, while simultaneously emphasizing social acceptance and community participation.", + "Sentence": "It further suggests: \n diversifying away from natural resource exports by expanding labour-intensive exports and tourism; \n implementing cash-for-work projects in relevant agricultural and natural resource sectors in rural areas; \n engaging traditional authorities in dispute resolution, particularly with regard to access to property and other natural resources (such as forestry, fishing and grazing land); and \n implementing labour-intensive infrastructure programmes to promote sustainable agriculture, including restoration of the natural resource base, while simultaneously emphasizing social acceptance and community participation.", "newParagraph": "united nation policy postconflict employment creation income generation reintegration 2009 n policy note importance addressing root cause conflict inequitable access land natural resource use fiscal redistributive incentive minimize social tension reintegration process suggests n diversifying away natural resource export expanding labourintensive export tourism n implementing cashforwork project relevant agricultural natural resource sector rural area n engaging traditional authority dispute resolution particularly regard access property natural resource forestry fishing grazing land n implementing labourintensive infrastructure programme promote sustainable agriculture including restoration natural resource base simultaneously emphasizing social acceptance community participation ", "ProcessedSent": "suggests n diversifying away natural resource export expanding labourintensive export tourism n implementing cashforwork project relevant agricultural natural resource sector rural area n engaging traditional authority dispute resolution particularly regard access property natural resource forestry fishing grazing land n implementing labourintensive infrastructure programme promote sustainable agriculture including restoration natural resource base simultaneously emphasizing social acceptance community participation", "SentID": 12238 }, { "ParagraphID": 3348, - "Paragraph": "ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989 (No. 169) \\n Convention No. 169 offers a unique framework for the protection of the rights of indigenous peoples as an integral aspect of inclusive and sustainable development. As the only international treaty on the subject, it contains specific provisions promoting the improvement of the standards of living of indigenous peoples from an inclusive perspective, and includes their participation from the initial stages in the planning of public policies that affect them, including labour policies. Regarding the rights of ownership and possession over the lands which they traditionally occupy shall be recognized.", + "Paragraph": "ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989 (No. 169) \n Convention No. 169 offers a unique framework for the protection of the rights of indigenous peoples as an integral aspect of inclusive and sustainable development. As the only international treaty on the subject, it contains specific provisions promoting the improvement of the standards of living of indigenous peoples from an inclusive perspective, and includes their participation from the initial stages in the planning of public policies that affect them, including labour policies. Regarding the rights of ownership and possession over the lands which they traditionally occupy shall be recognized.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220321,7 +220321,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3348, - "Paragraph": "ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989 (No. 169) \\n Convention No. 169 offers a unique framework for the protection of the rights of indigenous peoples as an integral aspect of inclusive and sustainable development. As the only international treaty on the subject, it contains specific provisions promoting the improvement of the standards of living of indigenous peoples from an inclusive perspective, and includes their participation from the initial stages in the planning of public policies that affect them, including labour policies. Regarding the rights of ownership and possession over the lands which they traditionally occupy shall be recognized.", + "Paragraph": "ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989 (No. 169) \n Convention No. 169 offers a unique framework for the protection of the rights of indigenous peoples as an integral aspect of inclusive and sustainable development. As the only international treaty on the subject, it contains specific provisions promoting the improvement of the standards of living of indigenous peoples from an inclusive perspective, and includes their participation from the initial stages in the planning of public policies that affect them, including labour policies. Regarding the rights of ownership and possession over the lands which they traditionally occupy shall be recognized.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220332,14 +220332,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "169) \\n Convention No.", + "Sentence": "169) \n Convention No.", "newParagraph": "ilo indigenous tribal people convention 1989 169 n convention 169 offer unique framework protection right indigenous people integral aspect inclusive sustainable development international treaty subject contains specific provision promoting improvement standard living indigenous people inclusive perspective includes participation initial stage planning public policy affect including labour policy regarding right ownership possession land traditionally occupy shall recognized", "ProcessedSent": "169 n convention", "SentID": 12240 }, { "ParagraphID": 3348, - "Paragraph": "ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989 (No. 169) \\n Convention No. 169 offers a unique framework for the protection of the rights of indigenous peoples as an integral aspect of inclusive and sustainable development. As the only international treaty on the subject, it contains specific provisions promoting the improvement of the standards of living of indigenous peoples from an inclusive perspective, and includes their participation from the initial stages in the planning of public policies that affect them, including labour policies. Regarding the rights of ownership and possession over the lands which they traditionally occupy shall be recognized.", + "Paragraph": "ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989 (No. 169) \n Convention No. 169 offers a unique framework for the protection of the rights of indigenous peoples as an integral aspect of inclusive and sustainable development. As the only international treaty on the subject, it contains specific provisions promoting the improvement of the standards of living of indigenous peoples from an inclusive perspective, and includes their participation from the initial stages in the planning of public policies that affect them, including labour policies. Regarding the rights of ownership and possession over the lands which they traditionally occupy shall be recognized.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220357,7 +220357,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3348, - "Paragraph": "ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989 (No. 169) \\n Convention No. 169 offers a unique framework for the protection of the rights of indigenous peoples as an integral aspect of inclusive and sustainable development. As the only international treaty on the subject, it contains specific provisions promoting the improvement of the standards of living of indigenous peoples from an inclusive perspective, and includes their participation from the initial stages in the planning of public policies that affect them, including labour policies. Regarding the rights of ownership and possession over the lands which they traditionally occupy shall be recognized.", + "Paragraph": "ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989 (No. 169) \n Convention No. 169 offers a unique framework for the protection of the rights of indigenous peoples as an integral aspect of inclusive and sustainable development. As the only international treaty on the subject, it contains specific provisions promoting the improvement of the standards of living of indigenous peoples from an inclusive perspective, and includes their participation from the initial stages in the planning of public policies that affect them, including labour policies. Regarding the rights of ownership and possession over the lands which they traditionally occupy shall be recognized.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220375,7 +220375,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3348, - "Paragraph": "ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989 (No. 169) \\n Convention No. 169 offers a unique framework for the protection of the rights of indigenous peoples as an integral aspect of inclusive and sustainable development. As the only international treaty on the subject, it contains specific provisions promoting the improvement of the standards of living of indigenous peoples from an inclusive perspective, and includes their participation from the initial stages in the planning of public policies that affect them, including labour policies. Regarding the rights of ownership and possession over the lands which they traditionally occupy shall be recognized.", + "Paragraph": "ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989 (No. 169) \n Convention No. 169 offers a unique framework for the protection of the rights of indigenous peoples as an integral aspect of inclusive and sustainable development. As the only international treaty on the subject, it contains specific provisions promoting the improvement of the standards of living of indigenous peoples from an inclusive perspective, and includes their participation from the initial stages in the planning of public policies that affect them, including labour policies. Regarding the rights of ownership and possession over the lands which they traditionally occupy shall be recognized.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220393,7 +220393,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3349, - "Paragraph": "ILO Recommendation on Employment and Decent Work for Peace and Resilience (No 205) 2017 This policy builds on ILO recommendation 77 \\n Transition from War to peace and features an expanded scope including internal conflicts and disasters. It broadens and updates the guidance on employment and several other elements of the Decent Work Agenda, taking into account the current global context and the complex and evolving nature of contemporary crises as well as the experience gained by the ILO and the international community in crisis response over the last decades. It also focuses on recovery and reconstruction in post-conflict and disaster situations, as well as on addressing root causes of fragility and taking preventive measures for building resilience.", + "Paragraph": "ILO Recommendation on Employment and Decent Work for Peace and Resilience (No 205) 2017 This policy builds on ILO recommendation 77 \n Transition from War to peace and features an expanded scope including internal conflicts and disasters. It broadens and updates the guidance on employment and several other elements of the Decent Work Agenda, taking into account the current global context and the complex and evolving nature of contemporary crises as well as the experience gained by the ILO and the international community in crisis response over the last decades. It also focuses on recovery and reconstruction in post-conflict and disaster situations, as well as on addressing root causes of fragility and taking preventive measures for building resilience.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220404,14 +220404,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "ILO Recommendation on Employment and Decent Work for Peace and Resilience (No 205) 2017 This policy builds on ILO recommendation 77 \\n Transition from War to peace and features an expanded scope including internal conflicts and disasters.", + "Sentence": "ILO Recommendation on Employment and Decent Work for Peace and Resilience (No 205) 2017 This policy builds on ILO recommendation 77 \n Transition from War to peace and features an expanded scope including internal conflicts and disasters.", "newParagraph": "ilo recommendation employment decent work peace resilience 205 2017 policy build ilo recommendation 77 n transition war peace feature expanded scope including internal conflict disaster broadens update guidance employment several element decent work agenda taking account current global context complex evolving nature contemporary crisis well experience gained ilo international community crisis response last decade also focus recovery reconstruction postconflict disaster situation well addressing root cause fragility taking preventive measure building resilience", "ProcessedSent": "ilo recommendation employment decent work peace resilience 205 2017 policy build ilo recommendation 77 n transition war peace feature expanded scope including internal conflict disaster", "SentID": 12244 }, { "ParagraphID": 3349, - "Paragraph": "ILO Recommendation on Employment and Decent Work for Peace and Resilience (No 205) 2017 This policy builds on ILO recommendation 77 \\n Transition from War to peace and features an expanded scope including internal conflicts and disasters. It broadens and updates the guidance on employment and several other elements of the Decent Work Agenda, taking into account the current global context and the complex and evolving nature of contemporary crises as well as the experience gained by the ILO and the international community in crisis response over the last decades. It also focuses on recovery and reconstruction in post-conflict and disaster situations, as well as on addressing root causes of fragility and taking preventive measures for building resilience.", + "Paragraph": "ILO Recommendation on Employment and Decent Work for Peace and Resilience (No 205) 2017 This policy builds on ILO recommendation 77 \n Transition from War to peace and features an expanded scope including internal conflicts and disasters. It broadens and updates the guidance on employment and several other elements of the Decent Work Agenda, taking into account the current global context and the complex and evolving nature of contemporary crises as well as the experience gained by the ILO and the international community in crisis response over the last decades. It also focuses on recovery and reconstruction in post-conflict and disaster situations, as well as on addressing root causes of fragility and taking preventive measures for building resilience.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220429,7 +220429,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3349, - "Paragraph": "ILO Recommendation on Employment and Decent Work for Peace and Resilience (No 205) 2017 This policy builds on ILO recommendation 77 \\n Transition from War to peace and features an expanded scope including internal conflicts and disasters. It broadens and updates the guidance on employment and several other elements of the Decent Work Agenda, taking into account the current global context and the complex and evolving nature of contemporary crises as well as the experience gained by the ILO and the international community in crisis response over the last decades. It also focuses on recovery and reconstruction in post-conflict and disaster situations, as well as on addressing root causes of fragility and taking preventive measures for building resilience.", + "Paragraph": "ILO Recommendation on Employment and Decent Work for Peace and Resilience (No 205) 2017 This policy builds on ILO recommendation 77 \n Transition from War to peace and features an expanded scope including internal conflicts and disasters. It broadens and updates the guidance on employment and several other elements of the Decent Work Agenda, taking into account the current global context and the complex and evolving nature of contemporary crises as well as the experience gained by the ILO and the international community in crisis response over the last decades. It also focuses on recovery and reconstruction in post-conflict and disaster situations, as well as on addressing root causes of fragility and taking preventive measures for building resilience.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220447,7 +220447,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3350, - "Paragraph": "Security Council \u201cResolution 1509 (2003)\u201d on Liberia (S\/RES\/1509); \u201cResolution 1565 (2004)\u201d on DRC (S\/RES\/1565); and \u201cResolution 1856 (2008)\u201d on DRC (S\/RES\/1856) \\n\\n These resolutions share an emphasis on the link between armed conflict and the illicit exploitation and trade of natural resources, categorically condemning the illegal exploitation of these resources and other sources of wealth: \\n In resolution 1509 (2003), the UN Peacekeeping Mission in Liberia was called upon to assist the transitional government in restoring the proper administration of natural resources; \\n Resolution 1565 (2004) \u201curge[s] all States, especially those in the region including the Democratic Republic of the Congo itself, to take appropriate steps in order to end these illegal activities, including if necessary, through judicial means \u2026 and exhort[ed] the international financial institutions to assist the Government of National Unity and Transition in establishing efficient and transparent control of the exploitation of natural resources;\u201d \\n \u201cRecognizing the link between the illegal exploitation of natural resources, the illicit trade in such resources and the proliferation and trafficking of arms as one of the major factors fuelling and exacerbating conflicts in the Great Lakes region of Africa, and in particular in the Democratic Republic of the Congo,\u201d Security Council Resolution 1856 (2008) decided that the UN Peacekeeping Mission would work in close cooperation with the Government in order to, among other things, execute the \u201cdisarmament, demobilization, monitoring of resources of foreign and Congolese armed groups,\u201d and more specifically, \u201cuse its monitoring and inspection capacities to curtail the provision of support to illegal armed groups derived from illicit trade in natural resources.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "Security Council \u201cResolution 1509 (2003)\u201d on Liberia (S\/RES\/1509); \u201cResolution 1565 (2004)\u201d on DRC (S\/RES\/1565); and \u201cResolution 1856 (2008)\u201d on DRC (S\/RES\/1856) \n\n These resolutions share an emphasis on the link between armed conflict and the illicit exploitation and trade of natural resources, categorically condemning the illegal exploitation of these resources and other sources of wealth: \n In resolution 1509 (2003), the UN Peacekeeping Mission in Liberia was called upon to assist the transitional government in restoring the proper administration of natural resources; \n Resolution 1565 (2004) \u201curge[s] all States, especially those in the region including the Democratic Republic of the Congo itself, to take appropriate steps in order to end these illegal activities, including if necessary, through judicial means \u2026 and exhort[ed] the international financial institutions to assist the Government of National Unity and Transition in establishing efficient and transparent control of the exploitation of natural resources;\u201d \n \u201cRecognizing the link between the illegal exploitation of natural resources, the illicit trade in such resources and the proliferation and trafficking of arms as one of the major factors fuelling and exacerbating conflicts in the Great Lakes region of Africa, and in particular in the Democratic Republic of the Congo,\u201d Security Council Resolution 1856 (2008) decided that the UN Peacekeeping Mission would work in close cooperation with the Government in order to, among other things, execute the \u201cdisarmament, demobilization, monitoring of resources of foreign and Congolese armed groups,\u201d and more specifically, \u201cuse its monitoring and inspection capacities to curtail the provision of support to illegal armed groups derived from illicit trade in natural resources.\u201d", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220458,14 +220458,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Security Council \u201cResolution 1509 (2003)\u201d on Liberia (S\/RES\/1509); \u201cResolution 1565 (2004)\u201d on DRC (S\/RES\/1565); and \u201cResolution 1856 (2008)\u201d on DRC (S\/RES\/1856) \\n\\n These resolutions share an emphasis on the link between armed conflict and the illicit exploitation and trade of natural resources, categorically condemning the illegal exploitation of these resources and other sources of wealth: \\n In resolution 1509 (2003), the UN Peacekeeping Mission in Liberia was called upon to assist the transitional government in restoring the proper administration of natural resources; \\n Resolution 1565 (2004) \u201curge[s] all States, especially those in the region including the Democratic Republic of the Congo itself, to take appropriate steps in order to end these illegal activities, including if necessary, through judicial means \u2026 and exhort[ed] the international financial institutions to assist the Government of National Unity and Transition in establishing efficient and transparent control of the exploitation of natural resources;\u201d \\n \u201cRecognizing the link between the illegal exploitation of natural resources, the illicit trade in such resources and the proliferation and trafficking of arms as one of the major factors fuelling and exacerbating conflicts in the Great Lakes region of Africa, and in particular in the Democratic Republic of the Congo,\u201d Security Council Resolution 1856 (2008) decided that the UN Peacekeeping Mission would work in close cooperation with the Government in order to, among other things, execute the \u201cdisarmament, demobilization, monitoring of resources of foreign and Congolese armed groups,\u201d and more specifically, \u201cuse its monitoring and inspection capacities to curtail the provision of support to illegal armed groups derived from illicit trade in natural resources.\u201d", + "Sentence": "Security Council \u201cResolution 1509 (2003)\u201d on Liberia (S\/RES\/1509); \u201cResolution 1565 (2004)\u201d on DRC (S\/RES\/1565); and \u201cResolution 1856 (2008)\u201d on DRC (S\/RES\/1856) \n\n These resolutions share an emphasis on the link between armed conflict and the illicit exploitation and trade of natural resources, categorically condemning the illegal exploitation of these resources and other sources of wealth: \n In resolution 1509 (2003), the UN Peacekeeping Mission in Liberia was called upon to assist the transitional government in restoring the proper administration of natural resources; \n Resolution 1565 (2004) \u201curge[s] all States, especially those in the region including the Democratic Republic of the Congo itself, to take appropriate steps in order to end these illegal activities, including if necessary, through judicial means \u2026 and exhort[ed] the international financial institutions to assist the Government of National Unity and Transition in establishing efficient and transparent control of the exploitation of natural resources;\u201d \n \u201cRecognizing the link between the illegal exploitation of natural resources, the illicit trade in such resources and the proliferation and trafficking of arms as one of the major factors fuelling and exacerbating conflicts in the Great Lakes region of Africa, and in particular in the Democratic Republic of the Congo,\u201d Security Council Resolution 1856 (2008) decided that the UN Peacekeeping Mission would work in close cooperation with the Government in order to, among other things, execute the \u201cdisarmament, demobilization, monitoring of resources of foreign and Congolese armed groups,\u201d and more specifically, \u201cuse its monitoring and inspection capacities to curtail the provision of support to illegal armed groups derived from illicit trade in natural resources.\u201d", "newParagraph": "security council resolution 1509 2003 liberia sres1509 resolution 1565 2004 drc sres1565 resolution 1856 2008 drc sres1856 nn resolution share emphasis link armed conflict illicit exploitation trade natural resource categorically condemning illegal exploitation resource source wealth n resolution 1509 2003 un peacekeeping mission liberia called upon assist transitional government restoring proper administration natural resource n resolution 1565 2004 urge state especially region including democratic republic congo take appropriate step order end illegal activity including necessary judicial mean exhorted international financial institution assist government national unity transition establishing efficient transparent control exploitation natural resource n recognizing link illegal exploitation natural resource illicit trade resource proliferation trafficking arm one major factor fuelling exacerbating conflict great lake region africa particular democratic republic congo security council resolution 1856 2008 decided un peacekeeping mission would work close cooperation government order among thing execute disarmament demobilization monitoring resource foreign congolese armed group specifically use monitoring inspection capacity curtail provision support illegal armed group derived illicit trade natural resource ", "ProcessedSent": "security council resolution 1509 2003 liberia sres1509 resolution 1565 2004 drc sres1565 resolution 1856 2008 drc sres1856 nn resolution share emphasis link armed conflict illicit exploitation trade natural resource categorically condemning illegal exploitation resource source wealth n resolution 1509 2003 un peacekeeping mission liberia called upon assist transitional government restoring proper administration natural resource n resolution 1565 2004 urge state especially region including democratic republic congo take appropriate step order end illegal activity including necessary judicial mean exhorted international financial institution assist government national unity transition establishing efficient transparent control exploitation natural resource n recognizing link illegal exploitation natural resource illicit trade resource proliferation trafficking arm one major factor fuelling exacerbating conflict great lake region africa particular democratic republic congo security council resolution 1856 2008 decided un peacekeeping mission would work close cooperation government order among thing execute disarmament demobilization monitoring resource foreign congolese armed group specifically use monitoring inspection capacity curtail provision support illegal armed group derived illicit trade natural resource ", "SentID": 12247 }, { "ParagraphID": 3351, - "Paragraph": "Report of the Secretary-General entitled Progress report on the prevention of armed conflict of 18 July 2006 (A\/60\/891) \\n The Secretary-General\u2019s progress report notes that \u201cThe most effective way to prevent crisis is to reduce the impact of risk factors \u2026 These include, for instance, international efforts to regulate trade in resources that fuel conflict, such as diamonds \u2026 efforts to combat narcotics cultivation, trafficking and addiction \u2026 and steps to reduce environmental degradation, with its associated economic and political fallout. Many of these endeavours include international regulatory frameworks and the building of national capacities.\u201d In addition, he emphasizes more specifically that, \u201cEnvironmental degradation has the potential to destabilize already conflict-prone regions, especially when compounded by inequitable access or politicization of access to scarce resources,\u201d and \u201curge[s] Member States to renew their efforts to agree on ways that allow all of us to live sustainably within the planet\u2019s means.\u201d He encourages, among other things, implementing programmes that \u201ccan also have a positive impact locally by promoting dialogue around shared resources and enabling opposing groups to focus on common problems.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "Report of the Secretary-General entitled Progress report on the prevention of armed conflict of 18 July 2006 (A\/60\/891) \n The Secretary-General\u2019s progress report notes that \u201cThe most effective way to prevent crisis is to reduce the impact of risk factors \u2026 These include, for instance, international efforts to regulate trade in resources that fuel conflict, such as diamonds \u2026 efforts to combat narcotics cultivation, trafficking and addiction \u2026 and steps to reduce environmental degradation, with its associated economic and political fallout. Many of these endeavours include international regulatory frameworks and the building of national capacities.\u201d In addition, he emphasizes more specifically that, \u201cEnvironmental degradation has the potential to destabilize already conflict-prone regions, especially when compounded by inequitable access or politicization of access to scarce resources,\u201d and \u201curge[s] Member States to renew their efforts to agree on ways that allow all of us to live sustainably within the planet\u2019s means.\u201d He encourages, among other things, implementing programmes that \u201ccan also have a positive impact locally by promoting dialogue around shared resources and enabling opposing groups to focus on common problems.\u201d", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220476,14 +220476,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Report of the Secretary-General entitled Progress report on the prevention of armed conflict of 18 July 2006 (A\/60\/891) \\n The Secretary-General\u2019s progress report notes that \u201cThe most effective way to prevent crisis is to reduce the impact of risk factors \u2026 These include, for instance, international efforts to regulate trade in resources that fuel conflict, such as diamonds \u2026 efforts to combat narcotics cultivation, trafficking and addiction \u2026 and steps to reduce environmental degradation, with its associated economic and political fallout.", + "Sentence": "Report of the Secretary-General entitled Progress report on the prevention of armed conflict of 18 July 2006 (A\/60\/891) \n The Secretary-General\u2019s progress report notes that \u201cThe most effective way to prevent crisis is to reduce the impact of risk factors \u2026 These include, for instance, international efforts to regulate trade in resources that fuel conflict, such as diamonds \u2026 efforts to combat narcotics cultivation, trafficking and addiction \u2026 and steps to reduce environmental degradation, with its associated economic and political fallout.", "newParagraph": "report secretarygeneral entitled progress report prevention armed conflict 18 july 2006 a60891 n secretarygeneral progress report note effective way prevent crisis reduce impact risk factor include instance international effort regulate trade resource fuel conflict diamond effort combat narcotic cultivation trafficking addiction step reduce environmental degradation associated economic political fallout many endeavour include international regulatory framework building national capacity addition emphasizes specifically environmental degradation potential destabilize already conflictprone region especially compounded inequitable access politicization access scarce resource urge member state renew effort agree way allow u live sustainably within planet mean encourages among thing implementing programme also positive impact locally promoting dialogue around shared resource enabling opposing group focus common problem ", "ProcessedSent": "report secretarygeneral entitled progress report prevention armed conflict 18 july 2006 a60891 n secretarygeneral progress report note effective way prevent crisis reduce impact risk factor include instance international effort regulate trade resource fuel conflict diamond effort combat narcotic cultivation trafficking addiction step reduce environmental degradation associated economic political fallout", "SentID": 12248 }, { "ParagraphID": 3351, - "Paragraph": "Report of the Secretary-General entitled Progress report on the prevention of armed conflict of 18 July 2006 (A\/60\/891) \\n The Secretary-General\u2019s progress report notes that \u201cThe most effective way to prevent crisis is to reduce the impact of risk factors \u2026 These include, for instance, international efforts to regulate trade in resources that fuel conflict, such as diamonds \u2026 efforts to combat narcotics cultivation, trafficking and addiction \u2026 and steps to reduce environmental degradation, with its associated economic and political fallout. Many of these endeavours include international regulatory frameworks and the building of national capacities.\u201d In addition, he emphasizes more specifically that, \u201cEnvironmental degradation has the potential to destabilize already conflict-prone regions, especially when compounded by inequitable access or politicization of access to scarce resources,\u201d and \u201curge[s] Member States to renew their efforts to agree on ways that allow all of us to live sustainably within the planet\u2019s means.\u201d He encourages, among other things, implementing programmes that \u201ccan also have a positive impact locally by promoting dialogue around shared resources and enabling opposing groups to focus on common problems.\u201d", + "Paragraph": "Report of the Secretary-General entitled Progress report on the prevention of armed conflict of 18 July 2006 (A\/60\/891) \n The Secretary-General\u2019s progress report notes that \u201cThe most effective way to prevent crisis is to reduce the impact of risk factors \u2026 These include, for instance, international efforts to regulate trade in resources that fuel conflict, such as diamonds \u2026 efforts to combat narcotics cultivation, trafficking and addiction \u2026 and steps to reduce environmental degradation, with its associated economic and political fallout. Many of these endeavours include international regulatory frameworks and the building of national capacities.\u201d In addition, he emphasizes more specifically that, \u201cEnvironmental degradation has the potential to destabilize already conflict-prone regions, especially when compounded by inequitable access or politicization of access to scarce resources,\u201d and \u201curge[s] Member States to renew their efforts to agree on ways that allow all of us to live sustainably within the planet\u2019s means.\u201d He encourages, among other things, implementing programmes that \u201ccan also have a positive impact locally by promoting dialogue around shared resources and enabling opposing groups to focus on common problems.\u201d", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220501,7 +220501,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3352, - "Paragraph": "UNDG-ECHA Guidance Note on Natural Resource Management in Transition Settings (January 2013) \\n This note provides guidance on policy anchors for natural resource management in transition settings, key guiding questions for extractive industries, renewable resources and land to help understand their existing and potential contribution to conflict and peacebuilding and describes entry points where these issues should be considered within existing UN processes and tools. It also includes annexes, which highlight tools, resources and sources of best practice and other guidance for addressing natural resource management challenges in transition settings.", + "Paragraph": "UNDG-ECHA Guidance Note on Natural Resource Management in Transition Settings (January 2013) \n This note provides guidance on policy anchors for natural resource management in transition settings, key guiding questions for extractive industries, renewable resources and land to help understand their existing and potential contribution to conflict and peacebuilding and describes entry points where these issues should be considered within existing UN processes and tools. It also includes annexes, which highlight tools, resources and sources of best practice and other guidance for addressing natural resource management challenges in transition settings.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220512,14 +220512,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "UNDG-ECHA Guidance Note on Natural Resource Management in Transition Settings (January 2013) \\n This note provides guidance on policy anchors for natural resource management in transition settings, key guiding questions for extractive industries, renewable resources and land to help understand their existing and potential contribution to conflict and peacebuilding and describes entry points where these issues should be considered within existing UN processes and tools.", + "Sentence": "UNDG-ECHA Guidance Note on Natural Resource Management in Transition Settings (January 2013) \n This note provides guidance on policy anchors for natural resource management in transition settings, key guiding questions for extractive industries, renewable resources and land to help understand their existing and potential contribution to conflict and peacebuilding and describes entry points where these issues should be considered within existing UN processes and tools.", "newParagraph": "undgecha guidance note natural resource management transition setting january 2013 n note provides guidance policy anchor natural resource management transition setting key guiding question extractive industry renewable resource land help understand existing potential contribution conflict peacebuilding describes entry point issue considered within existing un process tool also includes annex highlight tool resource source best practice guidance addressing natural resource management challenge transition setting", "ProcessedSent": "undgecha guidance note natural resource management transition setting january 2013 n note provides guidance policy anchor natural resource management transition setting key guiding question extractive industry renewable resource land help understand existing potential contribution conflict peacebuilding describes entry point issue considered within existing un process tool", "SentID": 12250 }, { "ParagraphID": 3352, - "Paragraph": "UNDG-ECHA Guidance Note on Natural Resource Management in Transition Settings (January 2013) \\n This note provides guidance on policy anchors for natural resource management in transition settings, key guiding questions for extractive industries, renewable resources and land to help understand their existing and potential contribution to conflict and peacebuilding and describes entry points where these issues should be considered within existing UN processes and tools. It also includes annexes, which highlight tools, resources and sources of best practice and other guidance for addressing natural resource management challenges in transition settings.", + "Paragraph": "UNDG-ECHA Guidance Note on Natural Resource Management in Transition Settings (January 2013) \n This note provides guidance on policy anchors for natural resource management in transition settings, key guiding questions for extractive industries, renewable resources and land to help understand their existing and potential contribution to conflict and peacebuilding and describes entry points where these issues should be considered within existing UN processes and tools. It also includes annexes, which highlight tools, resources and sources of best practice and other guidance for addressing natural resource management challenges in transition settings.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220537,7 +220537,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3353, - "Paragraph": "Examples of relevant Certification Schemes, Standards, Guidelines and Principles \\n Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) The EITI is a coalition of governments, companies, civil society groups, investors and international organizations that has developed an international standard for transparent reporting on revenues from natural resources. With the EITI, companies publish what they pay and governments publish what they receive in order to encourage transparency and accountability on both sides. The process is overseen by a multi stakeholder group of governments, civil society and companies that provides a forum for dialogue and a platform for broader reforms along the natural resources value chain.", + "Paragraph": "Examples of relevant Certification Schemes, Standards, Guidelines and Principles \n Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) The EITI is a coalition of governments, companies, civil society groups, investors and international organizations that has developed an international standard for transparent reporting on revenues from natural resources. With the EITI, companies publish what they pay and governments publish what they receive in order to encourage transparency and accountability on both sides. The process is overseen by a multi stakeholder group of governments, civil society and companies that provides a forum for dialogue and a platform for broader reforms along the natural resources value chain.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220548,14 +220548,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Examples of relevant Certification Schemes, Standards, Guidelines and Principles \\n Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) The EITI is a coalition of governments, companies, civil society groups, investors and international organizations that has developed an international standard for transparent reporting on revenues from natural resources.", + "Sentence": "Examples of relevant Certification Schemes, Standards, Guidelines and Principles \n Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) The EITI is a coalition of governments, companies, civil society groups, investors and international organizations that has developed an international standard for transparent reporting on revenues from natural resources.", "newParagraph": "example relevant certification scheme standard guideline principle n extractive industry transparency initiative eiti eiti coalition government company civil society group investor international organization developed international standard transparent reporting revenue natural resource eiti company publish pay government publish receive order encourage transparency accountability side process overseen multi stakeholder group government civil society company provides forum dialogue platform broader reform along natural resource value chain", "ProcessedSent": "example relevant certification scheme standard guideline principle n extractive industry transparency initiative eiti eiti coalition government company civil society group investor international organization developed international standard transparent reporting revenue natural resource", "SentID": 12252 }, { "ParagraphID": 3353, - "Paragraph": "Examples of relevant Certification Schemes, Standards, Guidelines and Principles \\n Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) The EITI is a coalition of governments, companies, civil society groups, investors and international organizations that has developed an international standard for transparent reporting on revenues from natural resources. With the EITI, companies publish what they pay and governments publish what they receive in order to encourage transparency and accountability on both sides. The process is overseen by a multi stakeholder group of governments, civil society and companies that provides a forum for dialogue and a platform for broader reforms along the natural resources value chain.", + "Paragraph": "Examples of relevant Certification Schemes, Standards, Guidelines and Principles \n Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) The EITI is a coalition of governments, companies, civil society groups, investors and international organizations that has developed an international standard for transparent reporting on revenues from natural resources. With the EITI, companies publish what they pay and governments publish what they receive in order to encourage transparency and accountability on both sides. The process is overseen by a multi stakeholder group of governments, civil society and companies that provides a forum for dialogue and a platform for broader reforms along the natural resources value chain.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220573,7 +220573,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3353, - "Paragraph": "Examples of relevant Certification Schemes, Standards, Guidelines and Principles \\n Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) The EITI is a coalition of governments, companies, civil society groups, investors and international organizations that has developed an international standard for transparent reporting on revenues from natural resources. With the EITI, companies publish what they pay and governments publish what they receive in order to encourage transparency and accountability on both sides. The process is overseen by a multi stakeholder group of governments, civil society and companies that provides a forum for dialogue and a platform for broader reforms along the natural resources value chain.", + "Paragraph": "Examples of relevant Certification Schemes, Standards, Guidelines and Principles \n Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) The EITI is a coalition of governments, companies, civil society groups, investors and international organizations that has developed an international standard for transparent reporting on revenues from natural resources. With the EITI, companies publish what they pay and governments publish what they receive in order to encourage transparency and accountability on both sides. The process is overseen by a multi stakeholder group of governments, civil society and companies that provides a forum for dialogue and a platform for broader reforms along the natural resources value chain.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220591,7 +220591,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3354, - "Paragraph": "Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Land Tenure Guidelines \\n The purpose of these guidelines is to serve as a reference and provide guidance to improve the governance of tenure of land, fisheries and forests with the overarching goal of achieving food security for all. The Guidelines have a particular focus on the linkages between tenure of land, fisheries and forests with poverty eradication, food security and sustainable livelihoods, with an emphasis on vulnerable and marginalized people. They mention specific actions that can be taken in order to improve tenure for land, fisheries and forests, especially for women, children, youth and indigenous peoples, as well as for the resolution of disputes, conflicts over tenure, and cooperation on transboundary matters. The Guidelines are voluntary.", + "Paragraph": "Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Land Tenure Guidelines \n The purpose of these guidelines is to serve as a reference and provide guidance to improve the governance of tenure of land, fisheries and forests with the overarching goal of achieving food security for all. The Guidelines have a particular focus on the linkages between tenure of land, fisheries and forests with poverty eradication, food security and sustainable livelihoods, with an emphasis on vulnerable and marginalized people. They mention specific actions that can be taken in order to improve tenure for land, fisheries and forests, especially for women, children, youth and indigenous peoples, as well as for the resolution of disputes, conflicts over tenure, and cooperation on transboundary matters. The Guidelines are voluntary.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220602,14 +220602,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Land Tenure Guidelines \\n The purpose of these guidelines is to serve as a reference and provide guidance to improve the governance of tenure of land, fisheries and forests with the overarching goal of achieving food security for all.", + "Sentence": "Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Land Tenure Guidelines \n The purpose of these guidelines is to serve as a reference and provide guidance to improve the governance of tenure of land, fisheries and forests with the overarching goal of achieving food security for all.", "newParagraph": "food agriculture organization united nation land tenure guideline n purpose guideline serve reference provide guidance improve governance tenure land fishery forest overarching goal achieving food security guideline particular focus linkage tenure land fishery forest poverty eradication food security sustainable livelihood emphasis vulnerable marginalized people mention specific action taken order improve tenure land fishery forest especially woman child youth indigenous people well resolution dispute conflict tenure cooperation transboundary matter guideline voluntary", "ProcessedSent": "food agriculture organization united nation land tenure guideline n purpose guideline serve reference provide guidance improve governance tenure land fishery forest overarching goal achieving food security", "SentID": 12255 }, { "ParagraphID": 3354, - "Paragraph": "Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Land Tenure Guidelines \\n The purpose of these guidelines is to serve as a reference and provide guidance to improve the governance of tenure of land, fisheries and forests with the overarching goal of achieving food security for all. The Guidelines have a particular focus on the linkages between tenure of land, fisheries and forests with poverty eradication, food security and sustainable livelihoods, with an emphasis on vulnerable and marginalized people. They mention specific actions that can be taken in order to improve tenure for land, fisheries and forests, especially for women, children, youth and indigenous peoples, as well as for the resolution of disputes, conflicts over tenure, and cooperation on transboundary matters. The Guidelines are voluntary.", + "Paragraph": "Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Land Tenure Guidelines \n The purpose of these guidelines is to serve as a reference and provide guidance to improve the governance of tenure of land, fisheries and forests with the overarching goal of achieving food security for all. The Guidelines have a particular focus on the linkages between tenure of land, fisheries and forests with poverty eradication, food security and sustainable livelihoods, with an emphasis on vulnerable and marginalized people. They mention specific actions that can be taken in order to improve tenure for land, fisheries and forests, especially for women, children, youth and indigenous peoples, as well as for the resolution of disputes, conflicts over tenure, and cooperation on transboundary matters. The Guidelines are voluntary.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220627,7 +220627,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3354, - "Paragraph": "Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Land Tenure Guidelines \\n The purpose of these guidelines is to serve as a reference and provide guidance to improve the governance of tenure of land, fisheries and forests with the overarching goal of achieving food security for all. The Guidelines have a particular focus on the linkages between tenure of land, fisheries and forests with poverty eradication, food security and sustainable livelihoods, with an emphasis on vulnerable and marginalized people. They mention specific actions that can be taken in order to improve tenure for land, fisheries and forests, especially for women, children, youth and indigenous peoples, as well as for the resolution of disputes, conflicts over tenure, and cooperation on transboundary matters. The Guidelines are voluntary.", + "Paragraph": "Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Land Tenure Guidelines \n The purpose of these guidelines is to serve as a reference and provide guidance to improve the governance of tenure of land, fisheries and forests with the overarching goal of achieving food security for all. The Guidelines have a particular focus on the linkages between tenure of land, fisheries and forests with poverty eradication, food security and sustainable livelihoods, with an emphasis on vulnerable and marginalized people. They mention specific actions that can be taken in order to improve tenure for land, fisheries and forests, especially for women, children, youth and indigenous peoples, as well as for the resolution of disputes, conflicts over tenure, and cooperation on transboundary matters. The Guidelines are voluntary.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220645,7 +220645,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3354, - "Paragraph": "Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Land Tenure Guidelines \\n The purpose of these guidelines is to serve as a reference and provide guidance to improve the governance of tenure of land, fisheries and forests with the overarching goal of achieving food security for all. The Guidelines have a particular focus on the linkages between tenure of land, fisheries and forests with poverty eradication, food security and sustainable livelihoods, with an emphasis on vulnerable and marginalized people. They mention specific actions that can be taken in order to improve tenure for land, fisheries and forests, especially for women, children, youth and indigenous peoples, as well as for the resolution of disputes, conflicts over tenure, and cooperation on transboundary matters. The Guidelines are voluntary.", + "Paragraph": "Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Land Tenure Guidelines \n The purpose of these guidelines is to serve as a reference and provide guidance to improve the governance of tenure of land, fisheries and forests with the overarching goal of achieving food security for all. The Guidelines have a particular focus on the linkages between tenure of land, fisheries and forests with poverty eradication, food security and sustainable livelihoods, with an emphasis on vulnerable and marginalized people. They mention specific actions that can be taken in order to improve tenure for land, fisheries and forests, especially for women, children, youth and indigenous peoples, as well as for the resolution of disputes, conflicts over tenure, and cooperation on transboundary matters. The Guidelines are voluntary.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220663,7 +220663,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3355, - "Paragraph": "Pinheiro Principles on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons \\n The Pinheiro Principles on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons were endorsed by the United Nations Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights on 11 August 2005 and are firmly established on the basis of international humanitarian and human rights law. The Principles provide restitution practitioners, as well as States and UN agencies, with specific policy guidance relating to the legal, policy, procedural, institutional and technical implementation mechanisms for housing and property restitution following conflicts, disasters or complex emergencies. While the principles are focused on housing, land and property (HLP) rights, they also refer to commercial properties, including agricultural and pastoral land. They also advocate for the inclusion of HLP issues in peace agreements and for appeals or other humanitarian budgets.", + "Paragraph": "Pinheiro Principles on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons \n The Pinheiro Principles on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons were endorsed by the United Nations Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights on 11 August 2005 and are firmly established on the basis of international humanitarian and human rights law. The Principles provide restitution practitioners, as well as States and UN agencies, with specific policy guidance relating to the legal, policy, procedural, institutional and technical implementation mechanisms for housing and property restitution following conflicts, disasters or complex emergencies. While the principles are focused on housing, land and property (HLP) rights, they also refer to commercial properties, including agricultural and pastoral land. They also advocate for the inclusion of HLP issues in peace agreements and for appeals or other humanitarian budgets.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220674,14 +220674,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Pinheiro Principles on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons \\n The Pinheiro Principles on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons were endorsed by the United Nations Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights on 11 August 2005 and are firmly established on the basis of international humanitarian and human rights law.", + "Sentence": "Pinheiro Principles on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons \n The Pinheiro Principles on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons were endorsed by the United Nations Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights on 11 August 2005 and are firmly established on the basis of international humanitarian and human rights law.", "newParagraph": "pinheiro principle housing property restitution refugee displaced person n pinheiro principle housing property restitution refugee displaced person endorsed united nation subcommission promotion protection human right 11 august 2005 firmly established basis international humanitarian human right law principle provide restitution practitioner well state un agency specific policy guidance relating legal policy procedural institutional technical implementation mechanism housing property restitution following conflict disaster complex emergency principle focused housing land property hlp right also refer commercial property including agricultural pastoral land also advocate inclusion hlp issue peace agreement appeal humanitarian budget", "ProcessedSent": "pinheiro principle housing property restitution refugee displaced person n pinheiro principle housing property restitution refugee displaced person endorsed united nation subcommission promotion protection human right 11 august 2005 firmly established basis international humanitarian human right law", "SentID": 12259 }, { "ParagraphID": 3355, - "Paragraph": "Pinheiro Principles on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons \\n The Pinheiro Principles on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons were endorsed by the United Nations Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights on 11 August 2005 and are firmly established on the basis of international humanitarian and human rights law. The Principles provide restitution practitioners, as well as States and UN agencies, with specific policy guidance relating to the legal, policy, procedural, institutional and technical implementation mechanisms for housing and property restitution following conflicts, disasters or complex emergencies. While the principles are focused on housing, land and property (HLP) rights, they also refer to commercial properties, including agricultural and pastoral land. They also advocate for the inclusion of HLP issues in peace agreements and for appeals or other humanitarian budgets.", + "Paragraph": "Pinheiro Principles on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons \n The Pinheiro Principles on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons were endorsed by the United Nations Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights on 11 August 2005 and are firmly established on the basis of international humanitarian and human rights law. The Principles provide restitution practitioners, as well as States and UN agencies, with specific policy guidance relating to the legal, policy, procedural, institutional and technical implementation mechanisms for housing and property restitution following conflicts, disasters or complex emergencies. While the principles are focused on housing, land and property (HLP) rights, they also refer to commercial properties, including agricultural and pastoral land. They also advocate for the inclusion of HLP issues in peace agreements and for appeals or other humanitarian budgets.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220699,7 +220699,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3355, - "Paragraph": "Pinheiro Principles on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons \\n The Pinheiro Principles on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons were endorsed by the United Nations Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights on 11 August 2005 and are firmly established on the basis of international humanitarian and human rights law. The Principles provide restitution practitioners, as well as States and UN agencies, with specific policy guidance relating to the legal, policy, procedural, institutional and technical implementation mechanisms for housing and property restitution following conflicts, disasters or complex emergencies. While the principles are focused on housing, land and property (HLP) rights, they also refer to commercial properties, including agricultural and pastoral land. They also advocate for the inclusion of HLP issues in peace agreements and for appeals or other humanitarian budgets.", + "Paragraph": "Pinheiro Principles on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons \n The Pinheiro Principles on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons were endorsed by the United Nations Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights on 11 August 2005 and are firmly established on the basis of international humanitarian and human rights law. The Principles provide restitution practitioners, as well as States and UN agencies, with specific policy guidance relating to the legal, policy, procedural, institutional and technical implementation mechanisms for housing and property restitution following conflicts, disasters or complex emergencies. While the principles are focused on housing, land and property (HLP) rights, they also refer to commercial properties, including agricultural and pastoral land. They also advocate for the inclusion of HLP issues in peace agreements and for appeals or other humanitarian budgets.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220717,7 +220717,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3355, - "Paragraph": "Pinheiro Principles on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons \\n The Pinheiro Principles on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons were endorsed by the United Nations Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights on 11 August 2005 and are firmly established on the basis of international humanitarian and human rights law. The Principles provide restitution practitioners, as well as States and UN agencies, with specific policy guidance relating to the legal, policy, procedural, institutional and technical implementation mechanisms for housing and property restitution following conflicts, disasters or complex emergencies. While the principles are focused on housing, land and property (HLP) rights, they also refer to commercial properties, including agricultural and pastoral land. They also advocate for the inclusion of HLP issues in peace agreements and for appeals or other humanitarian budgets.", + "Paragraph": "Pinheiro Principles on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons \n The Pinheiro Principles on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons were endorsed by the United Nations Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights on 11 August 2005 and are firmly established on the basis of international humanitarian and human rights law. The Principles provide restitution practitioners, as well as States and UN agencies, with specific policy guidance relating to the legal, policy, procedural, institutional and technical implementation mechanisms for housing and property restitution following conflicts, disasters or complex emergencies. While the principles are focused on housing, land and property (HLP) rights, they also refer to commercial properties, including agricultural and pastoral land. They also advocate for the inclusion of HLP issues in peace agreements and for appeals or other humanitarian budgets.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220735,7 +220735,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3356, - "Paragraph": "Natural Resources Charter \\n The Natural Resource Charter is a set of principles for governments and societies on how to best harness the opportunities created by extractive resources for development. It outlines tools and policy options designed to avoid the mismanagement of diminishing natural riches and ensure their ongoing benefits. The charter is organized around 12 core precepts offering guidance on key decisions governments face, beginning with whether to extract resources and ending with how generated revenue can produce maximum good for citizens. It is not a recipe or blueprint for the policies and institutions countries must build, but rather a set of principles to guide decision making processes. First launched in 2010 at the annual meetings of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, the charter was written by an independent group of practitioners and academics under the governance of an oversight board composed of distinguished international figures with first-hand experience of the challenges faced by resource-rich countries.", + "Paragraph": "Natural Resources Charter \n The Natural Resource Charter is a set of principles for governments and societies on how to best harness the opportunities created by extractive resources for development. It outlines tools and policy options designed to avoid the mismanagement of diminishing natural riches and ensure their ongoing benefits. The charter is organized around 12 core precepts offering guidance on key decisions governments face, beginning with whether to extract resources and ending with how generated revenue can produce maximum good for citizens. It is not a recipe or blueprint for the policies and institutions countries must build, but rather a set of principles to guide decision making processes. First launched in 2010 at the annual meetings of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, the charter was written by an independent group of practitioners and academics under the governance of an oversight board composed of distinguished international figures with first-hand experience of the challenges faced by resource-rich countries.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220746,14 +220746,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Natural Resources Charter \\n The Natural Resource Charter is a set of principles for governments and societies on how to best harness the opportunities created by extractive resources for development.", + "Sentence": "Natural Resources Charter \n The Natural Resource Charter is a set of principles for governments and societies on how to best harness the opportunities created by extractive resources for development.", "newParagraph": "natural resource charter n natural resource charter set principle government society best harness opportunity created extractive resource development outline tool policy option designed avoid mismanagement diminishing natural rich ensure ongoing benefit charter organized around 12 core precept offering guidance key decision government face beginning whether extract resource ending generated revenue produce maximum good citizen recipe blueprint policy institution country must build rather set principle guide decision making process first launched 2010 annual meeting international monetary fund world bank charter written independent group practitioner academic governance oversight board composed distinguished international figure firsthand experience challenge faced resourcerich country", "ProcessedSent": "natural resource charter n natural resource charter set principle government society best harness opportunity created extractive resource development", "SentID": 12263 }, { "ParagraphID": 3356, - "Paragraph": "Natural Resources Charter \\n The Natural Resource Charter is a set of principles for governments and societies on how to best harness the opportunities created by extractive resources for development. It outlines tools and policy options designed to avoid the mismanagement of diminishing natural riches and ensure their ongoing benefits. The charter is organized around 12 core precepts offering guidance on key decisions governments face, beginning with whether to extract resources and ending with how generated revenue can produce maximum good for citizens. It is not a recipe or blueprint for the policies and institutions countries must build, but rather a set of principles to guide decision making processes. First launched in 2010 at the annual meetings of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, the charter was written by an independent group of practitioners and academics under the governance of an oversight board composed of distinguished international figures with first-hand experience of the challenges faced by resource-rich countries.", + "Paragraph": "Natural Resources Charter \n The Natural Resource Charter is a set of principles for governments and societies on how to best harness the opportunities created by extractive resources for development. It outlines tools and policy options designed to avoid the mismanagement of diminishing natural riches and ensure their ongoing benefits. The charter is organized around 12 core precepts offering guidance on key decisions governments face, beginning with whether to extract resources and ending with how generated revenue can produce maximum good for citizens. It is not a recipe or blueprint for the policies and institutions countries must build, but rather a set of principles to guide decision making processes. First launched in 2010 at the annual meetings of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, the charter was written by an independent group of practitioners and academics under the governance of an oversight board composed of distinguished international figures with first-hand experience of the challenges faced by resource-rich countries.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220771,7 +220771,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3356, - "Paragraph": "Natural Resources Charter \\n The Natural Resource Charter is a set of principles for governments and societies on how to best harness the opportunities created by extractive resources for development. It outlines tools and policy options designed to avoid the mismanagement of diminishing natural riches and ensure their ongoing benefits. The charter is organized around 12 core precepts offering guidance on key decisions governments face, beginning with whether to extract resources and ending with how generated revenue can produce maximum good for citizens. It is not a recipe or blueprint for the policies and institutions countries must build, but rather a set of principles to guide decision making processes. First launched in 2010 at the annual meetings of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, the charter was written by an independent group of practitioners and academics under the governance of an oversight board composed of distinguished international figures with first-hand experience of the challenges faced by resource-rich countries.", + "Paragraph": "Natural Resources Charter \n The Natural Resource Charter is a set of principles for governments and societies on how to best harness the opportunities created by extractive resources for development. It outlines tools and policy options designed to avoid the mismanagement of diminishing natural riches and ensure their ongoing benefits. The charter is organized around 12 core precepts offering guidance on key decisions governments face, beginning with whether to extract resources and ending with how generated revenue can produce maximum good for citizens. It is not a recipe or blueprint for the policies and institutions countries must build, but rather a set of principles to guide decision making processes. First launched in 2010 at the annual meetings of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, the charter was written by an independent group of practitioners and academics under the governance of an oversight board composed of distinguished international figures with first-hand experience of the challenges faced by resource-rich countries.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220789,7 +220789,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3356, - "Paragraph": "Natural Resources Charter \\n The Natural Resource Charter is a set of principles for governments and societies on how to best harness the opportunities created by extractive resources for development. It outlines tools and policy options designed to avoid the mismanagement of diminishing natural riches and ensure their ongoing benefits. The charter is organized around 12 core precepts offering guidance on key decisions governments face, beginning with whether to extract resources and ending with how generated revenue can produce maximum good for citizens. It is not a recipe or blueprint for the policies and institutions countries must build, but rather a set of principles to guide decision making processes. First launched in 2010 at the annual meetings of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, the charter was written by an independent group of practitioners and academics under the governance of an oversight board composed of distinguished international figures with first-hand experience of the challenges faced by resource-rich countries.", + "Paragraph": "Natural Resources Charter \n The Natural Resource Charter is a set of principles for governments and societies on how to best harness the opportunities created by extractive resources for development. It outlines tools and policy options designed to avoid the mismanagement of diminishing natural riches and ensure their ongoing benefits. The charter is organized around 12 core precepts offering guidance on key decisions governments face, beginning with whether to extract resources and ending with how generated revenue can produce maximum good for citizens. It is not a recipe or blueprint for the policies and institutions countries must build, but rather a set of principles to guide decision making processes. First launched in 2010 at the annual meetings of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, the charter was written by an independent group of practitioners and academics under the governance of an oversight board composed of distinguished international figures with first-hand experience of the challenges faced by resource-rich countries.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220807,7 +220807,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3356, - "Paragraph": "Natural Resources Charter \\n The Natural Resource Charter is a set of principles for governments and societies on how to best harness the opportunities created by extractive resources for development. It outlines tools and policy options designed to avoid the mismanagement of diminishing natural riches and ensure their ongoing benefits. The charter is organized around 12 core precepts offering guidance on key decisions governments face, beginning with whether to extract resources and ending with how generated revenue can produce maximum good for citizens. It is not a recipe or blueprint for the policies and institutions countries must build, but rather a set of principles to guide decision making processes. First launched in 2010 at the annual meetings of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, the charter was written by an independent group of practitioners and academics under the governance of an oversight board composed of distinguished international figures with first-hand experience of the challenges faced by resource-rich countries.", + "Paragraph": "Natural Resources Charter \n The Natural Resource Charter is a set of principles for governments and societies on how to best harness the opportunities created by extractive resources for development. It outlines tools and policy options designed to avoid the mismanagement of diminishing natural riches and ensure their ongoing benefits. The charter is organized around 12 core precepts offering guidance on key decisions governments face, beginning with whether to extract resources and ending with how generated revenue can produce maximum good for citizens. It is not a recipe or blueprint for the policies and institutions countries must build, but rather a set of principles to guide decision making processes. First launched in 2010 at the annual meetings of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, the charter was written by an independent group of practitioners and academics under the governance of an oversight board composed of distinguished international figures with first-hand experience of the challenges faced by resource-rich countries.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220825,7 +220825,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3357, - "Paragraph": "OECD due diligence guidance for responsible supply chains of minerals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas \\n The OECD Due Diligence Guidance provides detailed recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. This Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas. The OECD Guidance is global in scope and applies to all mineral supply chains. ", + "Paragraph": "OECD due diligence guidance for responsible supply chains of minerals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas \n The OECD Due Diligence Guidance provides detailed recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. This Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas. The OECD Guidance is global in scope and applies to all mineral supply chains. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220836,14 +220836,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "OECD due diligence guidance for responsible supply chains of minerals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas \\n The OECD Due Diligence Guidance provides detailed recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices.", + "Sentence": "OECD due diligence guidance for responsible supply chains of minerals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas \n The OECD Due Diligence Guidance provides detailed recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices.", "newParagraph": "oecd due diligence guidance responsible supply chain mineral conflictaffected highrisk area n oecd due diligence guidance provides detailed recommendation help company respect human right avoid contributing conflict mineral purchasing decision practice guidance use company potentially sourcing mineral metal conflictaffected highrisk area oecd guidance global scope applies mineral supply chain ", "ProcessedSent": "oecd due diligence guidance responsible supply chain mineral conflictaffected highrisk area n oecd due diligence guidance provides detailed recommendation help company respect human right avoid contributing conflict mineral purchasing decision practice", "SentID": 12268 }, { "ParagraphID": 3357, - "Paragraph": "OECD due diligence guidance for responsible supply chains of minerals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas \\n The OECD Due Diligence Guidance provides detailed recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. This Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas. The OECD Guidance is global in scope and applies to all mineral supply chains. ", + "Paragraph": "OECD due diligence guidance for responsible supply chains of minerals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas \n The OECD Due Diligence Guidance provides detailed recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. This Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas. The OECD Guidance is global in scope and applies to all mineral supply chains. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220861,7 +220861,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3357, - "Paragraph": "OECD due diligence guidance for responsible supply chains of minerals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas \\n The OECD Due Diligence Guidance provides detailed recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. This Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas. The OECD Guidance is global in scope and applies to all mineral supply chains. ", + "Paragraph": "OECD due diligence guidance for responsible supply chains of minerals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas \n The OECD Due Diligence Guidance provides detailed recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. This Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas. The OECD Guidance is global in scope and applies to all mineral supply chains. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220879,7 +220879,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3358, - "Paragraph": "Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Act \\n The \u201cconflict minerals\u201d provision\u2014commonly known as Section 1502 of the Dodd Frank Act\u2014 requires U.S. publicly-listed companies to check their supply chains for tin, tungsten, tantalum and gold, if they might originate in Congo or its neighbors, take steps to address any risks they find, and to report on their efforts every year to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Companies are not encouraged to stop sourcing from this region but are required to show they are working with the appropriate care\u2014what is now known as \u201cdue diligence\u201d\u2014to make sure they are not funding armed groups or human rights abuses.", + "Paragraph": "Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Act \n The \u201cconflict minerals\u201d provision\u2014commonly known as Section 1502 of the Dodd Frank Act\u2014 requires U.S. publicly-listed companies to check their supply chains for tin, tungsten, tantalum and gold, if they might originate in Congo or its neighbors, take steps to address any risks they find, and to report on their efforts every year to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Companies are not encouraged to stop sourcing from this region but are required to show they are working with the appropriate care\u2014what is now known as \u201cdue diligence\u201d\u2014to make sure they are not funding armed groups or human rights abuses.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220890,14 +220890,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Act \\n The \u201cconflict minerals\u201d provision\u2014commonly known as Section 1502 of the Dodd Frank Act\u2014 requires U.S. publicly-listed companies to check their supply chains for tin, tungsten, tantalum and gold, if they might originate in Congo or its neighbors, take steps to address any risks they find, and to report on their efforts every year to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).", + "Sentence": "Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Act \n The \u201cconflict minerals\u201d provision\u2014commonly known as Section 1502 of the Dodd Frank Act\u2014 requires U.S. publicly-listed companies to check their supply chains for tin, tungsten, tantalum and gold, if they might originate in Congo or its neighbors, take steps to address any risks they find, and to report on their efforts every year to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).", "newParagraph": "section 1502 doddfrank act n conflict mineral provision commonly known section 1502 dodd frank act requires u publiclylisted company check supply chain tin tungsten tantalum gold might originate congo neighbor take step address risk find report effort every year u security exchange commission sec company encouraged stop sourcing region required show working appropriate care known due diligence make sure funding armed group human right abuse", "ProcessedSent": "section 1502 doddfrank act n conflict mineral provision commonly known section 1502 dodd frank act requires u publiclylisted company check supply chain tin tungsten tantalum gold might originate congo neighbor take step address risk find report effort every year u security exchange commission sec", "SentID": 12271 }, { "ParagraphID": 3358, - "Paragraph": "Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Act \\n The \u201cconflict minerals\u201d provision\u2014commonly known as Section 1502 of the Dodd Frank Act\u2014 requires U.S. publicly-listed companies to check their supply chains for tin, tungsten, tantalum and gold, if they might originate in Congo or its neighbors, take steps to address any risks they find, and to report on their efforts every year to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Companies are not encouraged to stop sourcing from this region but are required to show they are working with the appropriate care\u2014what is now known as \u201cdue diligence\u201d\u2014to make sure they are not funding armed groups or human rights abuses.", + "Paragraph": "Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Act \n The \u201cconflict minerals\u201d provision\u2014commonly known as Section 1502 of the Dodd Frank Act\u2014 requires U.S. publicly-listed companies to check their supply chains for tin, tungsten, tantalum and gold, if they might originate in Congo or its neighbors, take steps to address any risks they find, and to report on their efforts every year to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Companies are not encouraged to stop sourcing from this region but are required to show they are working with the appropriate care\u2014what is now known as \u201cdue diligence\u201d\u2014to make sure they are not funding armed groups or human rights abuses.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220915,7 +220915,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3359, - "Paragraph": "Kimberley Process \\n The Kimberley Process Certification Scheme (KPCS) imposes extensive requirements on its members to enable them to certify shipments of rough diamonds as \u2018conflict-free' and prevent conflict diamonds from entering the legitimate trade. Under the terms of the KPCS, participating states must meet \u2018minimum requirements' and must put in place national legislation and institutions; export, import and internal controls; and also commit to transparency and the exchange of statistical data. Participants can only legally trade with other participants who have also met the minimum requirements of the scheme, and international shipments of rough diamonds must be accompanied by a KP certificate guaranteeing that they are conflict-free.", + "Paragraph": "Kimberley Process \n The Kimberley Process Certification Scheme (KPCS) imposes extensive requirements on its members to enable them to certify shipments of rough diamonds as \u2018conflict-free' and prevent conflict diamonds from entering the legitimate trade. Under the terms of the KPCS, participating states must meet \u2018minimum requirements' and must put in place national legislation and institutions; export, import and internal controls; and also commit to transparency and the exchange of statistical data. Participants can only legally trade with other participants who have also met the minimum requirements of the scheme, and international shipments of rough diamonds must be accompanied by a KP certificate guaranteeing that they are conflict-free.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220926,14 +220926,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Kimberley Process \\n The Kimberley Process Certification Scheme (KPCS) imposes extensive requirements on its members to enable them to certify shipments of rough diamonds as \u2018conflict-free' and prevent conflict diamonds from entering the legitimate trade.", + "Sentence": "Kimberley Process \n The Kimberley Process Certification Scheme (KPCS) imposes extensive requirements on its members to enable them to certify shipments of rough diamonds as \u2018conflict-free' and prevent conflict diamonds from entering the legitimate trade.", "newParagraph": "kimberley process n kimberley process certification scheme kpcs imposes extensive requirement member enable certify shipment rough diamond conflictfree prevent conflict diamond entering legitimate trade term kpcs participating state must meet minimum requirement must put place national legislation institution export import internal control also commit transparency exchange statistical data participant legally trade participant also met minimum requirement scheme international shipment rough diamond must accompanied kp certificate guaranteeing conflictfree", "ProcessedSent": "kimberley process n kimberley process certification scheme kpcs imposes extensive requirement member enable certify shipment rough diamond conflictfree prevent conflict diamond entering legitimate trade", "SentID": 12273 }, { "ParagraphID": 3359, - "Paragraph": "Kimberley Process \\n The Kimberley Process Certification Scheme (KPCS) imposes extensive requirements on its members to enable them to certify shipments of rough diamonds as \u2018conflict-free' and prevent conflict diamonds from entering the legitimate trade. Under the terms of the KPCS, participating states must meet \u2018minimum requirements' and must put in place national legislation and institutions; export, import and internal controls; and also commit to transparency and the exchange of statistical data. Participants can only legally trade with other participants who have also met the minimum requirements of the scheme, and international shipments of rough diamonds must be accompanied by a KP certificate guaranteeing that they are conflict-free.", + "Paragraph": "Kimberley Process \n The Kimberley Process Certification Scheme (KPCS) imposes extensive requirements on its members to enable them to certify shipments of rough diamonds as \u2018conflict-free' and prevent conflict diamonds from entering the legitimate trade. Under the terms of the KPCS, participating states must meet \u2018minimum requirements' and must put in place national legislation and institutions; export, import and internal controls; and also commit to transparency and the exchange of statistical data. Participants can only legally trade with other participants who have also met the minimum requirements of the scheme, and international shipments of rough diamonds must be accompanied by a KP certificate guaranteeing that they are conflict-free.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220951,7 +220951,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3359, - "Paragraph": "Kimberley Process \\n The Kimberley Process Certification Scheme (KPCS) imposes extensive requirements on its members to enable them to certify shipments of rough diamonds as \u2018conflict-free' and prevent conflict diamonds from entering the legitimate trade. Under the terms of the KPCS, participating states must meet \u2018minimum requirements' and must put in place national legislation and institutions; export, import and internal controls; and also commit to transparency and the exchange of statistical data. Participants can only legally trade with other participants who have also met the minimum requirements of the scheme, and international shipments of rough diamonds must be accompanied by a KP certificate guaranteeing that they are conflict-free.", + "Paragraph": "Kimberley Process \n The Kimberley Process Certification Scheme (KPCS) imposes extensive requirements on its members to enable them to certify shipments of rough diamonds as \u2018conflict-free' and prevent conflict diamonds from entering the legitimate trade. Under the terms of the KPCS, participating states must meet \u2018minimum requirements' and must put in place national legislation and institutions; export, import and internal controls; and also commit to transparency and the exchange of statistical data. Participants can only legally trade with other participants who have also met the minimum requirements of the scheme, and international shipments of rough diamonds must be accompanied by a KP certificate guaranteeing that they are conflict-free.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220969,7 +220969,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3360, - "Paragraph": "UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights \\n The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights are a set of guidelines for States and companies to prevent, address and remedy human rights abuses committed in business operations. The Principles are organized under three main tenets: Protect, Respect and Remedy. Companies worldwide are expected to comply with these norms, which underpin existing movements to create due diligence legislation for company supply chain operations worldwide. ", + "Paragraph": "UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights \n The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights are a set of guidelines for States and companies to prevent, address and remedy human rights abuses committed in business operations. The Principles are organized under three main tenets: Protect, Respect and Remedy. Companies worldwide are expected to comply with these norms, which underpin existing movements to create due diligence legislation for company supply chain operations worldwide. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -220980,14 +220980,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights \\n The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights are a set of guidelines for States and companies to prevent, address and remedy human rights abuses committed in business operations.", + "Sentence": "UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights \n The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights are a set of guidelines for States and companies to prevent, address and remedy human rights abuses committed in business operations.", "newParagraph": "un guiding principle business human right n un guiding principle business human right set guideline state company prevent address remedy human right abuse committed business operation principle organized three main tenet protect respect remedy company worldwide expected comply norm underpin existing movement create due diligence legislation company supply chain operation worldwide ", "ProcessedSent": "un guiding principle business human right n un guiding principle business human right set guideline state company prevent address remedy human right abuse committed business operation", "SentID": 12276 }, { "ParagraphID": 3360, - "Paragraph": "UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights \\n The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights are a set of guidelines for States and companies to prevent, address and remedy human rights abuses committed in business operations. The Principles are organized under three main tenets: Protect, Respect and Remedy. Companies worldwide are expected to comply with these norms, which underpin existing movements to create due diligence legislation for company supply chain operations worldwide. ", + "Paragraph": "UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights \n The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights are a set of guidelines for States and companies to prevent, address and remedy human rights abuses committed in business operations. The Principles are organized under three main tenets: Protect, Respect and Remedy. Companies worldwide are expected to comply with these norms, which underpin existing movements to create due diligence legislation for company supply chain operations worldwide. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -221005,7 +221005,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3360, - "Paragraph": "UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights \\n The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights are a set of guidelines for States and companies to prevent, address and remedy human rights abuses committed in business operations. The Principles are organized under three main tenets: Protect, Respect and Remedy. Companies worldwide are expected to comply with these norms, which underpin existing movements to create due diligence legislation for company supply chain operations worldwide. ", + "Paragraph": "UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights \n The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights are a set of guidelines for States and companies to prevent, address and remedy human rights abuses committed in business operations. The Principles are organized under three main tenets: Protect, Respect and Remedy. Companies worldwide are expected to comply with these norms, which underpin existing movements to create due diligence legislation for company supply chain operations worldwide. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -221023,7 +221023,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3361, - "Paragraph": "Land Governance Assessment Framework (LGAF) \\n Development practitioners of all persuasions recognize that a well-functioning land sector can boost a country's economic growth, foster social development, shield the rights of vulnerable groups, and help with environmental protection. The World Bank\u2019s LGAF is a diagnostic instrument to assess the state of land governance at the national or sub-national level. Local experts rate the quality of a country's land governance along a comprehensive set of dimensions. These ratings and an accompanying report serve as the basis for policy dialogue at the national or sub-national level.", + "Paragraph": "Land Governance Assessment Framework (LGAF) \n Development practitioners of all persuasions recognize that a well-functioning land sector can boost a country's economic growth, foster social development, shield the rights of vulnerable groups, and help with environmental protection. The World Bank\u2019s LGAF is a diagnostic instrument to assess the state of land governance at the national or sub-national level. Local experts rate the quality of a country's land governance along a comprehensive set of dimensions. These ratings and an accompanying report serve as the basis for policy dialogue at the national or sub-national level.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -221034,14 +221034,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Land Governance Assessment Framework (LGAF) \\n Development practitioners of all persuasions recognize that a well-functioning land sector can boost a country's economic growth, foster social development, shield the rights of vulnerable groups, and help with environmental protection.", + "Sentence": "Land Governance Assessment Framework (LGAF) \n Development practitioners of all persuasions recognize that a well-functioning land sector can boost a country's economic growth, foster social development, shield the rights of vulnerable groups, and help with environmental protection.", "newParagraph": "land governance assessment framework lgaf n development practitioner persuasion recognize wellfunctioning land sector boost country economic growth foster social development shield right vulnerable group help environmental protection world bank lgaf diagnostic instrument ass state land governance national subnational level local expert rate quality country land governance along comprehensive set dimension rating accompanying report serve basis policy dialogue national subnational level", "ProcessedSent": "land governance assessment framework lgaf n development practitioner persuasion recognize wellfunctioning land sector boost country economic growth foster social development shield right vulnerable group help environmental protection", "SentID": 12279 }, { "ParagraphID": 3361, - "Paragraph": "Land Governance Assessment Framework (LGAF) \\n Development practitioners of all persuasions recognize that a well-functioning land sector can boost a country's economic growth, foster social development, shield the rights of vulnerable groups, and help with environmental protection. The World Bank\u2019s LGAF is a diagnostic instrument to assess the state of land governance at the national or sub-national level. Local experts rate the quality of a country's land governance along a comprehensive set of dimensions. These ratings and an accompanying report serve as the basis for policy dialogue at the national or sub-national level.", + "Paragraph": "Land Governance Assessment Framework (LGAF) \n Development practitioners of all persuasions recognize that a well-functioning land sector can boost a country's economic growth, foster social development, shield the rights of vulnerable groups, and help with environmental protection. The World Bank\u2019s LGAF is a diagnostic instrument to assess the state of land governance at the national or sub-national level. Local experts rate the quality of a country's land governance along a comprehensive set of dimensions. These ratings and an accompanying report serve as the basis for policy dialogue at the national or sub-national level.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -221059,7 +221059,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3361, - "Paragraph": "Land Governance Assessment Framework (LGAF) \\n Development practitioners of all persuasions recognize that a well-functioning land sector can boost a country's economic growth, foster social development, shield the rights of vulnerable groups, and help with environmental protection. The World Bank\u2019s LGAF is a diagnostic instrument to assess the state of land governance at the national or sub-national level. Local experts rate the quality of a country's land governance along a comprehensive set of dimensions. These ratings and an accompanying report serve as the basis for policy dialogue at the national or sub-national level.", + "Paragraph": "Land Governance Assessment Framework (LGAF) \n Development practitioners of all persuasions recognize that a well-functioning land sector can boost a country's economic growth, foster social development, shield the rights of vulnerable groups, and help with environmental protection. The World Bank\u2019s LGAF is a diagnostic instrument to assess the state of land governance at the national or sub-national level. Local experts rate the quality of a country's land governance along a comprehensive set of dimensions. These ratings and an accompanying report serve as the basis for policy dialogue at the national or sub-national level.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -221077,7 +221077,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3361, - "Paragraph": "Land Governance Assessment Framework (LGAF) \\n Development practitioners of all persuasions recognize that a well-functioning land sector can boost a country's economic growth, foster social development, shield the rights of vulnerable groups, and help with environmental protection. The World Bank\u2019s LGAF is a diagnostic instrument to assess the state of land governance at the national or sub-national level. Local experts rate the quality of a country's land governance along a comprehensive set of dimensions. These ratings and an accompanying report serve as the basis for policy dialogue at the national or sub-national level.", + "Paragraph": "Land Governance Assessment Framework (LGAF) \n Development practitioners of all persuasions recognize that a well-functioning land sector can boost a country's economic growth, foster social development, shield the rights of vulnerable groups, and help with environmental protection. The World Bank\u2019s LGAF is a diagnostic instrument to assess the state of land governance at the national or sub-national level. Local experts rate the quality of a country's land governance along a comprehensive set of dimensions. These ratings and an accompanying report serve as the basis for policy dialogue at the national or sub-national level.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -221419,7 +221419,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3366, - "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -221437,7 +221437,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3366, - "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -221455,7 +221455,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3366, - "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -221473,7 +221473,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3366, - "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Paragraph": "Annex A contains a list of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this standard. A com\u00ad plete glossary of all the terms, definitions and abbreviations used in the series of integrated DDR standards (IDDRS) is given in IDDRS 1.20. In the IDDRS series, the words \u2018shall\u2019, \u2018should\u2019, \u2018may\u2019, \u2018can\u2019 and \u2018must\u2019 are used to indicate the intended degree of compliance with the standards laid down. This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -221484,7 +221484,7 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \\n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \\n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \\n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \\n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \\n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", + "Sentence": "This use is consistent with the language used in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and guidelines: \n a) \u2018shall\u2019 is used to indicate requirements, methods or specifications that are to be applied in order to conform to the standard; \n b) \u2018should\u2019 is used to indicate the preferred requirements, methods or specifications; \n c) \u2018may\u2019 is used to indicate a possible method or course of action; \n d) \u2018can\u2019 is used to indicate a possibility and capability; and, \n e) \u2018must\u2019 is used to indicate an external constraint or obligation.", "newParagraph": "annex contains list term definition abbreviation used standard com plete glossary term definition abbreviation used series integrated ddr standard iddrs given iddrs 120 iddrs series word shall may must used indicate intended degree compliance standard laid use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "ProcessedSent": "use consistent language used international organization standardization iso standard guideline n shall used indicate requirement method specification applied order conform standard n b used indicate preferred requirement method specification n c may used indicate possible method course action n used indicate possibility capability n e must used indicate external constraint obligation", "SentID": 12304 @@ -224911,7 +224911,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3420, - "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \\n\\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \\n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \\n\\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \\n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \\n\\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \\n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", + "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \n\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \n\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \n\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -224922,14 +224922,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \\n\\n 1.", + "Sentence": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \n\n 1.", "newParagraph": "crime conflict postconflict setting mean ddr must planned three major overlapping factor mind nn 1 actor organized crime conflict converge several actor may involved including combatant criminal group well state actor fuelled particular often overlapping motif engagement similar activity moreover blurring motivation whether political social economic mean membership across group may fluid context success sustainability ddr rest treating armed group monolithic entity separate state armed force rather making alliance benefit adopting ruleoflaw procedure labelling legal illegal legitimate illegitimate done state actor normative decision definition privilege state particularly conflict setting state governance weak corrupt contested binary choice good versus bad arbitrary often reflect view population labelling actor organized criminal group potential partner peace process may discouraged engaging become spoiler instead n ddr planning economic social political motif persuade individual partake organized criminal activity identified understood ddr practitioner also recognize organized crime conflict affect particular group actor woman child differently nn 2 criminal activity type criminal activity given conflict setting may implication planning ddr process organized crime encompasses wide range activity certain criminal market frequently arise conflict setting including illegal exploitation natural resource weapon ammunition trafficking drug trafficking trafficking human being recent conflict also show conflict actor profiting protection extortion payment well kidnapping ransom exploitationbased crime organized crime similar nature example organized crime guided personal greed profit others receive local legitimacy address need local community amid infrastructural political collapse instance trafficking licit good subsidized food product form integral part economic livelihood strategy context rather seen criminal conduct activity organized criminal network may viewed way build parallel informal economy greater resilience15 n number factor relating given criminal economy considered planning ddr process including pervasiveness criminal economy whether evolved conflict violence link criminal activity armed conflict whether criminal activity carried reach threshold serious crime international law linkage organized crime terrorist andor terrorist group labour intensiveness criminal activity nn 3 context local context serf driver spoiler peacebuilding effort central planning ddr process particularly reintegration social factor including local culture perceived legitimacy criminal activity individual combatant general notion support hostility towards ddr shape way ddr approached moreover understanding broader economic andor political environment armed conflict begin end allows ddr practitioner identify entry point potential obstacle projection sustainability although ddr process deal member armed force group rather criminal important understand local circumstance beyond war context affect reintegration role reintegration play preventing former combatant person formerly associated armed group falling organized crime includes assessing state role either contributing deterring engagement illicit activity ability criminal group infiltrate conflict setting appealing former combatant n un peace operation may inadvertently contribute criminal flow misguided intervention indirect consequence presence intervention guided harm principle ddr practitioner support formulation context specific ddr process based sound analysis local factor vulnerability risk rather replicating past experience political analysis local context consider nonexhaustive list element listed table 1 extent possible identify gender dimension applicable", "ProcessedSent": "crime conflict postconflict setting mean ddr must planned three major overlapping factor mind nn 1", "SentID": 12495 }, { "ParagraphID": 3420, - "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \\n\\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \\n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \\n\\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \\n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \\n\\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \\n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", + "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \n\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \n\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \n\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -224947,7 +224947,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3420, - "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \\n\\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \\n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \\n\\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \\n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \\n\\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \\n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", + "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \n\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \n\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \n\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -224965,7 +224965,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3420, - "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \\n\\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \\n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \\n\\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \\n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \\n\\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \\n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", + "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \n\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \n\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \n\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -224983,7 +224983,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3420, - "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \\n\\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \\n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \\n\\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \\n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \\n\\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \\n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", + "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \n\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \n\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \n\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225001,7 +225001,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3420, - "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \\n\\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \\n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \\n\\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \\n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \\n\\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \\n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", + "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \n\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \n\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \n\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225019,7 +225019,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3420, - "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \\n\\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \\n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \\n\\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \\n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \\n\\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \\n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", + "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \n\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \n\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \n\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225037,7 +225037,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3420, - "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \\n\\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \\n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \\n\\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \\n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \\n\\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \\n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", + "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \n\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \n\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \n\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225048,14 +225048,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood.", + "Sentence": "\n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood.", "newParagraph": "crime conflict postconflict setting mean ddr must planned three major overlapping factor mind nn 1 actor organized crime conflict converge several actor may involved including combatant criminal group well state actor fuelled particular often overlapping motif engagement similar activity moreover blurring motivation whether political social economic mean membership across group may fluid context success sustainability ddr rest treating armed group monolithic entity separate state armed force rather making alliance benefit adopting ruleoflaw procedure labelling legal illegal legitimate illegitimate done state actor normative decision definition privilege state particularly conflict setting state governance weak corrupt contested binary choice good versus bad arbitrary often reflect view population labelling actor organized criminal group potential partner peace process may discouraged engaging become spoiler instead n ddr planning economic social political motif persuade individual partake organized criminal activity identified understood ddr practitioner also recognize organized crime conflict affect particular group actor woman child differently nn 2 criminal activity type criminal activity given conflict setting may implication planning ddr process organized crime encompasses wide range activity certain criminal market frequently arise conflict setting including illegal exploitation natural resource weapon ammunition trafficking drug trafficking trafficking human being recent conflict also show conflict actor profiting protection extortion payment well kidnapping ransom exploitationbased crime organized crime similar nature example organized crime guided personal greed profit others receive local legitimacy address need local community amid infrastructural political collapse instance trafficking licit good subsidized food product form integral part economic livelihood strategy context rather seen criminal conduct activity organized criminal network may viewed way build parallel informal economy greater resilience15 n number factor relating given criminal economy considered planning ddr process including pervasiveness criminal economy whether evolved conflict violence link criminal activity armed conflict whether criminal activity carried reach threshold serious crime international law linkage organized crime terrorist andor terrorist group labour intensiveness criminal activity nn 3 context local context serf driver spoiler peacebuilding effort central planning ddr process particularly reintegration social factor including local culture perceived legitimacy criminal activity individual combatant general notion support hostility towards ddr shape way ddr approached moreover understanding broader economic andor political environment armed conflict begin end allows ddr practitioner identify entry point potential obstacle projection sustainability although ddr process deal member armed force group rather criminal important understand local circumstance beyond war context affect reintegration role reintegration play preventing former combatant person formerly associated armed group falling organized crime includes assessing state role either contributing deterring engagement illicit activity ability criminal group infiltrate conflict setting appealing former combatant n un peace operation may inadvertently contribute criminal flow misguided intervention indirect consequence presence intervention guided harm principle ddr practitioner support formulation context specific ddr process based sound analysis local factor vulnerability risk rather replicating past experience political analysis local context consider nonexhaustive list element listed table 1 extent possible identify gender dimension applicable", "ProcessedSent": "n ddr planning economic social political motif persuade individual partake organized criminal activity identified understood", "SentID": 12502 }, { "ParagraphID": 3420, - "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \\n\\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \\n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \\n\\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \\n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \\n\\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \\n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", + "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \n\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \n\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \n\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225073,7 +225073,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3420, - "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \\n\\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \\n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \\n\\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \\n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \\n\\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \\n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", + "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \n\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \n\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \n\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225084,14 +225084,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n 2.", + "Sentence": "\n\n 2.", "newParagraph": "crime conflict postconflict setting mean ddr must planned three major overlapping factor mind nn 1 actor organized crime conflict converge several actor may involved including combatant criminal group well state actor fuelled particular often overlapping motif engagement similar activity moreover blurring motivation whether political social economic mean membership across group may fluid context success sustainability ddr rest treating armed group monolithic entity separate state armed force rather making alliance benefit adopting ruleoflaw procedure labelling legal illegal legitimate illegitimate done state actor normative decision definition privilege state particularly conflict setting state governance weak corrupt contested binary choice good versus bad arbitrary often reflect view population labelling actor organized criminal group potential partner peace process may discouraged engaging become spoiler instead n ddr planning economic social political motif persuade individual partake organized criminal activity identified understood ddr practitioner also recognize organized crime conflict affect particular group actor woman child differently nn 2 criminal activity type criminal activity given conflict setting may implication planning ddr process organized crime encompasses wide range activity certain criminal market frequently arise conflict setting including illegal exploitation natural resource weapon ammunition trafficking drug trafficking trafficking human being recent conflict also show conflict actor profiting protection extortion payment well kidnapping ransom exploitationbased crime organized crime similar nature example organized crime guided personal greed profit others receive local legitimacy address need local community amid infrastructural political collapse instance trafficking licit good subsidized food product form integral part economic livelihood strategy context rather seen criminal conduct activity organized criminal network may viewed way build parallel informal economy greater resilience15 n number factor relating given criminal economy considered planning ddr process including pervasiveness criminal economy whether evolved conflict violence link criminal activity armed conflict whether criminal activity carried reach threshold serious crime international law linkage organized crime terrorist andor terrorist group labour intensiveness criminal activity nn 3 context local context serf driver spoiler peacebuilding effort central planning ddr process particularly reintegration social factor including local culture perceived legitimacy criminal activity individual combatant general notion support hostility towards ddr shape way ddr approached moreover understanding broader economic andor political environment armed conflict begin end allows ddr practitioner identify entry point potential obstacle projection sustainability although ddr process deal member armed force group rather criminal important understand local circumstance beyond war context affect reintegration role reintegration play preventing former combatant person formerly associated armed group falling organized crime includes assessing state role either contributing deterring engagement illicit activity ability criminal group infiltrate conflict setting appealing former combatant n un peace operation may inadvertently contribute criminal flow misguided intervention indirect consequence presence intervention guided harm principle ddr practitioner support formulation context specific ddr process based sound analysis local factor vulnerability risk rather replicating past experience political analysis local context consider nonexhaustive list element listed table 1 extent possible identify gender dimension applicable", "ProcessedSent": "nn 2", "SentID": 12504 }, { "ParagraphID": 3420, - "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \\n\\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \\n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \\n\\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \\n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \\n\\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \\n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", + "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \n\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \n\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \n\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225109,7 +225109,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3420, - "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \\n\\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \\n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \\n\\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \\n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \\n\\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \\n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", + "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \n\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \n\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \n\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225127,7 +225127,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3420, - "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \\n\\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \\n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \\n\\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \\n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \\n\\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \\n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", + "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \n\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \n\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \n\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225145,7 +225145,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3420, - "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \\n\\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \\n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \\n\\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \\n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \\n\\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \\n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", + "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \n\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \n\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \n\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225163,7 +225163,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3420, - "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \\n\\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \\n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \\n\\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \\n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \\n\\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \\n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", + "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \n\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \n\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \n\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225181,7 +225181,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3420, - "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \\n\\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \\n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \\n\\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \\n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \\n\\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \\n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", + "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \n\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \n\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \n\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225199,7 +225199,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3420, - "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \\n\\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \\n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \\n\\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \\n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \\n\\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \\n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", + "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \n\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \n\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \n\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225210,14 +225210,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \\n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities.", + "Sentence": "In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities.", "newParagraph": "crime conflict postconflict setting mean ddr must planned three major overlapping factor mind nn 1 actor organized crime conflict converge several actor may involved including combatant criminal group well state actor fuelled particular often overlapping motif engagement similar activity moreover blurring motivation whether political social economic mean membership across group may fluid context success sustainability ddr rest treating armed group monolithic entity separate state armed force rather making alliance benefit adopting ruleoflaw procedure labelling legal illegal legitimate illegitimate done state actor normative decision definition privilege state particularly conflict setting state governance weak corrupt contested binary choice good versus bad arbitrary often reflect view population labelling actor organized criminal group potential partner peace process may discouraged engaging become spoiler instead n ddr planning economic social political motif persuade individual partake organized criminal activity identified understood ddr practitioner also recognize organized crime conflict affect particular group actor woman child differently nn 2 criminal activity type criminal activity given conflict setting may implication planning ddr process organized crime encompasses wide range activity certain criminal market frequently arise conflict setting including illegal exploitation natural resource weapon ammunition trafficking drug trafficking trafficking human being recent conflict also show conflict actor profiting protection extortion payment well kidnapping ransom exploitationbased crime organized crime similar nature example organized crime guided personal greed profit others receive local legitimacy address need local community amid infrastructural political collapse instance trafficking licit good subsidized food product form integral part economic livelihood strategy context rather seen criminal conduct activity organized criminal network may viewed way build parallel informal economy greater resilience15 n number factor relating given criminal economy considered planning ddr process including pervasiveness criminal economy whether evolved conflict violence link criminal activity armed conflict whether criminal activity carried reach threshold serious crime international law linkage organized crime terrorist andor terrorist group labour intensiveness criminal activity nn 3 context local context serf driver spoiler peacebuilding effort central planning ddr process particularly reintegration social factor including local culture perceived legitimacy criminal activity individual combatant general notion support hostility towards ddr shape way ddr approached moreover understanding broader economic andor political environment armed conflict begin end allows ddr practitioner identify entry point potential obstacle projection sustainability although ddr process deal member armed force group rather criminal important understand local circumstance beyond war context affect reintegration role reintegration play preventing former combatant person formerly associated armed group falling organized crime includes assessing state role either contributing deterring engagement illicit activity ability criminal group infiltrate conflict setting appealing former combatant n un peace operation may inadvertently contribute criminal flow misguided intervention indirect consequence presence intervention guided harm principle ddr practitioner support formulation context specific ddr process based sound analysis local factor vulnerability risk rather replicating past experience political analysis local context consider nonexhaustive list element listed table 1 extent possible identify gender dimension applicable", "ProcessedSent": "context rather seen criminal conduct activity organized criminal network may viewed way build parallel informal economy greater resilience15 n number factor relating given criminal economy considered planning ddr process including pervasiveness criminal economy whether evolved conflict violence link criminal activity armed conflict whether criminal activity carried reach threshold serious crime international law linkage organized crime terrorist andor terrorist group labour intensiveness criminal activity", "SentID": 12511 }, { "ParagraphID": 3420, - "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \\n\\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \\n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \\n\\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \\n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \\n\\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \\n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", + "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \n\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \n\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \n\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225228,14 +225228,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n 3.", + "Sentence": "\n\n 3.", "newParagraph": "crime conflict postconflict setting mean ddr must planned three major overlapping factor mind nn 1 actor organized crime conflict converge several actor may involved including combatant criminal group well state actor fuelled particular often overlapping motif engagement similar activity moreover blurring motivation whether political social economic mean membership across group may fluid context success sustainability ddr rest treating armed group monolithic entity separate state armed force rather making alliance benefit adopting ruleoflaw procedure labelling legal illegal legitimate illegitimate done state actor normative decision definition privilege state particularly conflict setting state governance weak corrupt contested binary choice good versus bad arbitrary often reflect view population labelling actor organized criminal group potential partner peace process may discouraged engaging become spoiler instead n ddr planning economic social political motif persuade individual partake organized criminal activity identified understood ddr practitioner also recognize organized crime conflict affect particular group actor woman child differently nn 2 criminal activity type criminal activity given conflict setting may implication planning ddr process organized crime encompasses wide range activity certain criminal market frequently arise conflict setting including illegal exploitation natural resource weapon ammunition trafficking drug trafficking trafficking human being recent conflict also show conflict actor profiting protection extortion payment well kidnapping ransom exploitationbased crime organized crime similar nature example organized crime guided personal greed profit others receive local legitimacy address need local community amid infrastructural political collapse instance trafficking licit good subsidized food product form integral part economic livelihood strategy context rather seen criminal conduct activity organized criminal network may viewed way build parallel informal economy greater resilience15 n number factor relating given criminal economy considered planning ddr process including pervasiveness criminal economy whether evolved conflict violence link criminal activity armed conflict whether criminal activity carried reach threshold serious crime international law linkage organized crime terrorist andor terrorist group labour intensiveness criminal activity nn 3 context local context serf driver spoiler peacebuilding effort central planning ddr process particularly reintegration social factor including local culture perceived legitimacy criminal activity individual combatant general notion support hostility towards ddr shape way ddr approached moreover understanding broader economic andor political environment armed conflict begin end allows ddr practitioner identify entry point potential obstacle projection sustainability although ddr process deal member armed force group rather criminal important understand local circumstance beyond war context affect reintegration role reintegration play preventing former combatant person formerly associated armed group falling organized crime includes assessing state role either contributing deterring engagement illicit activity ability criminal group infiltrate conflict setting appealing former combatant n un peace operation may inadvertently contribute criminal flow misguided intervention indirect consequence presence intervention guided harm principle ddr practitioner support formulation context specific ddr process based sound analysis local factor vulnerability risk rather replicating past experience political analysis local context consider nonexhaustive list element listed table 1 extent possible identify gender dimension applicable", "ProcessedSent": "nn 3", "SentID": 12512 }, { "ParagraphID": 3420, - "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \\n\\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \\n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \\n\\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \\n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \\n\\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \\n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", + "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \n\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \n\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \n\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225253,7 +225253,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3420, - "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \\n\\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \\n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \\n\\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \\n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \\n\\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \\n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", + "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \n\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \n\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \n\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225271,7 +225271,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3420, - "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \\n\\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \\n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \\n\\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \\n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \\n\\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \\n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", + "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \n\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \n\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \n\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225289,7 +225289,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3420, - "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \\n\\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \\n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \\n\\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \\n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \\n\\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \\n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", + "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \n\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \n\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \n\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225307,7 +225307,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3420, - "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \\n\\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \\n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \\n\\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \\n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \\n\\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \\n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", + "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \n\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \n\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \n\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225325,7 +225325,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3420, - "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \\n\\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \\n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \\n\\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \\n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \\n\\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \\n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", + "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \n\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \n\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \n\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225336,14 +225336,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.1 Assessments and design", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence.", + "Sentence": "\n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence.", "newParagraph": "crime conflict postconflict setting mean ddr must planned three major overlapping factor mind nn 1 actor organized crime conflict converge several actor may involved including combatant criminal group well state actor fuelled particular often overlapping motif engagement similar activity moreover blurring motivation whether political social economic mean membership across group may fluid context success sustainability ddr rest treating armed group monolithic entity separate state armed force rather making alliance benefit adopting ruleoflaw procedure labelling legal illegal legitimate illegitimate done state actor normative decision definition privilege state particularly conflict setting state governance weak corrupt contested binary choice good versus bad arbitrary often reflect view population labelling actor organized criminal group potential partner peace process may discouraged engaging become spoiler instead n ddr planning economic social political motif persuade individual partake organized criminal activity identified understood ddr practitioner also recognize organized crime conflict affect particular group actor woman child differently nn 2 criminal activity type criminal activity given conflict setting may implication planning ddr process organized crime encompasses wide range activity certain criminal market frequently arise conflict setting including illegal exploitation natural resource weapon ammunition trafficking drug trafficking trafficking human being recent conflict also show conflict actor profiting protection extortion payment well kidnapping ransom exploitationbased crime organized crime similar nature example organized crime guided personal greed profit others receive local legitimacy address need local community amid infrastructural political collapse instance trafficking licit good subsidized food product form integral part economic livelihood strategy context rather seen criminal conduct activity organized criminal network may viewed way build parallel informal economy greater resilience15 n number factor relating given criminal economy considered planning ddr process including pervasiveness criminal economy whether evolved conflict violence link criminal activity armed conflict whether criminal activity carried reach threshold serious crime international law linkage organized crime terrorist andor terrorist group labour intensiveness criminal activity nn 3 context local context serf driver spoiler peacebuilding effort central planning ddr process particularly reintegration social factor including local culture perceived legitimacy criminal activity individual combatant general notion support hostility towards ddr shape way ddr approached moreover understanding broader economic andor political environment armed conflict begin end allows ddr practitioner identify entry point potential obstacle projection sustainability although ddr process deal member armed force group rather criminal important understand local circumstance beyond war context affect reintegration role reintegration play preventing former combatant person formerly associated armed group falling organized crime includes assessing state role either contributing deterring engagement illicit activity ability criminal group infiltrate conflict setting appealing former combatant n un peace operation may inadvertently contribute criminal flow misguided intervention indirect consequence presence intervention guided harm principle ddr practitioner support formulation context specific ddr process based sound analysis local factor vulnerability risk rather replicating past experience political analysis local context consider nonexhaustive list element listed table 1 extent possible identify gender dimension applicable", "ProcessedSent": "n un peace operation may inadvertently contribute criminal flow misguided intervention indirect consequence presence", "SentID": 12518 }, { "ParagraphID": 3420, - "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \\n\\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \\n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \\n\\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \\n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \\n\\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \\n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", + "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \n\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \n\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \n\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225361,7 +225361,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3420, - "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \\n\\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \\n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \\n\\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \\n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \\n\\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \\n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", + "Paragraph": "Crime in conflict and post-conflict settings means that DDR must be planned with three major overlapping factors in mind: \n\n 1. Actors: When organized crime and conflict converge, several actors may be involved, including combatants and criminal groups as well as State actors, each fuelled by particular and often overlapping motives and engagement in similar activities. Moreover, the blurring of motivations, whether they be political, social or economic, means that membership across these groups may be fluid. In this context, the success and sustainability of DDR rests not in treating armed groups as monolithic entities separate from State armed forces, but rather in making alliances with those who benefit from adopting rule-of-law procedures. The labelling of what is legal and illegal, or legitimate and illegitimate, is done by State actors and, as this is a normative decision, the definition privileges the State. Particularly in conflict settings in which State governance is weak, corrupt or contested, the binary choice of good versus bad is arbitrary and often does not reflect the views of the population. In labelling actors as organized criminal groups, potential partners in peace processes may be discouraged from engaging and become spoilers instead. \n In DDR planning, the economic, social and political motives that persuade individuals to partake in organized criminal activities should be identified and understood. DDR practitioners should also recognize how organized crime and conflict affect particular groups of actors, such as women and children, differently. \n\n 2. Criminal activities: The type of criminal activity in a given conflict setting may have implications for the planning of DDR processes. While organized crime encompasses a wide range of activities, certain criminal markets frequently arise in conflict settings, including the illegal exploitation of natural resources, weapons and ammunition trafficking, drug trafficking and the trafficking of human beings. Recent conflicts also show conflict actors profiting from protection and extortion payments, as well as kidnapping for ransom and other exploitation-based crimes. Not all organized crimes are similar in nature. For example, while some organized crimes are guided by personal greed and profit, others receive local legitimacy because they address the needs of the local community amid an infrastructural and political collapse. For instance, the trafficking of licit goods, such as subsidized food products, can form an integral part of economic and livelihoods strategies. In this context, rather than being seen as criminal conduct, the activities of organized criminal networks may be viewed as a way to build parallel informal economies and greater resilience.15 \n A number of factors relating to any given criminal economy should be considered when planning a DDR process, including the pervasiveness of the criminal economy; whether it evolved before, during or after the conflict; how violence links criminal activities to armed conflict; whether criminal activities carried out reach the threshold of the most serious crimes under international law; linkages between organized crime and terrorists and\/or terrorist groups; and the labour intensiveness of criminal activities. \n\n 3. Context: How the local context serves as both a driver and spoiler of peacebuilding efforts is central to the planning of DDR processes, particularly reintegration. Social factors, including local culture, the perceived legitimacy of criminal activities and individual combatants, and general notions of support or hostility towards DDR itself, shape the way that DDR should be approached. Moreover, understanding the broader economic and\/or political environment in which armed conflict begins and ends allows DDR practitioners to identify entry points, potential obstacles and projections for sustainability. Although DDR processes deal with members of armed forces and groups rather than criminals, it is important to understand how local circumstances beyond the war context can affect reintegration, and the role that reintegration can play in preventing former combatants and persons formerly associated with armed groups from falling into organized crime. This includes assessing the State\u2019s role in either contributing to or deterring engagement in illicit activities, and the abilities of criminal groups to infiltrate conflict settings by appealing to former combatants. \n UN peace operations may inadvertently contribute to criminal flows because of misguided interventions or as an indirect consequence of their presence. Interventions should be guided by the \u2018do no harm\u2019 principle, and DDR practitioners should support the formulation of context- specific DDR processes based on a sound analysis of local factors, vulnerabilities and risks, rather than by replicating past experiences. A political analysis of the local context should consider the non-exhaustive list of elements listed in table 1 and, to the extent possible, identify gender dimensions where applicable.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225379,7 +225379,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3421, - "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \\n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \\n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \\n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \\n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \\n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", + "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225397,7 +225397,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3421, - "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \\n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \\n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \\n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \\n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \\n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", + "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225415,7 +225415,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3421, - "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \\n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \\n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \\n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \\n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \\n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", + "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225426,14 +225426,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.2 Risk management and implementation", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains.", + "Sentence": "\n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains.", "newParagraph": "planning design implementation monitoring ddr process organized crime context practitioner shall undertake comprehensive risk management scheme following list organized crime related risk intended assist ddr practitioner ass manage vulnerability context order prevent negative consequence n programmatic risk context ongoing conflict organized crime activity used economic powerseeking gain risk excombatants recruited continue engage criminal activity higher conflict ongoing protracted financed organized crime absence formal peace agreement ddr participant may reluctant give perceived opportunity illicit activity offer particularly reintegration opportunity limited formal informal economy overlap unresolved grievance persist n harm risk ddr process present risk reinforcing illicit activity flow may also vulnerable corruption capture ddr practitioner shall ensure process implemented manner avoids inadvertently contributing illicit flow andor retaliation armed force group engage criminal activity includes careful selection partnering institution group implement ddr process within organized crime conflict context ddr process may also present risk reinforcing extortion scheme payment cashstipends ddr participant part reinsertion assistance practitioner consider distribution payment issuance prepaid card voucher digital transfer possible reduce risk participant extorted engaged criminal activity including armed force group n security risk possibility armed group directly targeting staffprogrammes may perceive hostile high ongoing conflict context particularly ddr process perceived associated removal livelihood social status conversely ddr practitioner perceived supporting individual formerly associated criminal activity particularly engaged violence local population also risk reprisal certain community national actor also important potential risk community civil society group may arise consequence engagement ddr process properly assessed managed mitigated n reputational risk ddr practitioner aware risk seen promoting impunity lenient towards individual may engaged scheme violent governance community ddr practitioner also aware risk may seen complicit abusive state policy andor behaviour particularly armed force known engage organized criminal activity pervasive corruption due diligence appropriate framework safeguard mechanism shall applied continuously address complex issue n legal risk ddr practitioner rely government donor may face additional challenge government insert condition clause grant agreement order comply security council resolution stated iddrs 211 legal framework un ddr ddr practitioner consult legal adviser applicable host state national legislation criminalizes provision support including suspected terrorist armed group designated terrorist organization information legal issue risk see section 53 module", "ProcessedSent": "n programmatic risk context ongoing conflict organized crime activity used economic powerseeking gain", "SentID": 12523 }, { "ParagraphID": 3421, - "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \\n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \\n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \\n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \\n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \\n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", + "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225451,7 +225451,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3421, - "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \\n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \\n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \\n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \\n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \\n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", + "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225469,7 +225469,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3421, - "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \\n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \\n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \\n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \\n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \\n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", + "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225480,14 +225480,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.2 Risk management and implementation", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities.", + "Sentence": "\n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities.", "newParagraph": "planning design implementation monitoring ddr process organized crime context practitioner shall undertake comprehensive risk management scheme following list organized crime related risk intended assist ddr practitioner ass manage vulnerability context order prevent negative consequence n programmatic risk context ongoing conflict organized crime activity used economic powerseeking gain risk excombatants recruited continue engage criminal activity higher conflict ongoing protracted financed organized crime absence formal peace agreement ddr participant may reluctant give perceived opportunity illicit activity offer particularly reintegration opportunity limited formal informal economy overlap unresolved grievance persist n harm risk ddr process present risk reinforcing illicit activity flow may also vulnerable corruption capture ddr practitioner shall ensure process implemented manner avoids inadvertently contributing illicit flow andor retaliation armed force group engage criminal activity includes careful selection partnering institution group implement ddr process within organized crime conflict context ddr process may also present risk reinforcing extortion scheme payment cashstipends ddr participant part reinsertion assistance practitioner consider distribution payment issuance prepaid card voucher digital transfer possible reduce risk participant extorted engaged criminal activity including armed force group n security risk possibility armed group directly targeting staffprogrammes may perceive hostile high ongoing conflict context particularly ddr process perceived associated removal livelihood social status conversely ddr practitioner perceived supporting individual formerly associated criminal activity particularly engaged violence local population also risk reprisal certain community national actor also important potential risk community civil society group may arise consequence engagement ddr process properly assessed managed mitigated n reputational risk ddr practitioner aware risk seen promoting impunity lenient towards individual may engaged scheme violent governance community ddr practitioner also aware risk may seen complicit abusive state policy andor behaviour particularly armed force known engage organized criminal activity pervasive corruption due diligence appropriate framework safeguard mechanism shall applied continuously address complex issue n legal risk ddr practitioner rely government donor may face additional challenge government insert condition clause grant agreement order comply security council resolution stated iddrs 211 legal framework un ddr ddr practitioner consult legal adviser applicable host state national legislation criminalizes provision support including suspected terrorist armed group designated terrorist organization information legal issue risk see section 53 module", "ProcessedSent": "n harm risk ddr process present risk reinforcing illicit activity flow may also vulnerable corruption capture ddr practitioner shall ensure process implemented manner avoids inadvertently contributing illicit flow andor retaliation armed force group engage criminal activity", "SentID": 12526 }, { "ParagraphID": 3421, - "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \\n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \\n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \\n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \\n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \\n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", + "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225505,7 +225505,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3421, - "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \\n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \\n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \\n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \\n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \\n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", + "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225523,7 +225523,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3421, - "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \\n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \\n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \\n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \\n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \\n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", + "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225541,7 +225541,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3421, - "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \\n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \\n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \\n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \\n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \\n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", + "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225552,14 +225552,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.2 Risk management and implementation", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status.", + "Sentence": "\n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status.", "newParagraph": "planning design implementation monitoring ddr process organized crime context practitioner shall undertake comprehensive risk management scheme following list organized crime related risk intended assist ddr practitioner ass manage vulnerability context order prevent negative consequence n programmatic risk context ongoing conflict organized crime activity used economic powerseeking gain risk excombatants recruited continue engage criminal activity higher conflict ongoing protracted financed organized crime absence formal peace agreement ddr participant may reluctant give perceived opportunity illicit activity offer particularly reintegration opportunity limited formal informal economy overlap unresolved grievance persist n harm risk ddr process present risk reinforcing illicit activity flow may also vulnerable corruption capture ddr practitioner shall ensure process implemented manner avoids inadvertently contributing illicit flow andor retaliation armed force group engage criminal activity includes careful selection partnering institution group implement ddr process within organized crime conflict context ddr process may also present risk reinforcing extortion scheme payment cashstipends ddr participant part reinsertion assistance practitioner consider distribution payment issuance prepaid card voucher digital transfer possible reduce risk participant extorted engaged criminal activity including armed force group n security risk possibility armed group directly targeting staffprogrammes may perceive hostile high ongoing conflict context particularly ddr process perceived associated removal livelihood social status conversely ddr practitioner perceived supporting individual formerly associated criminal activity particularly engaged violence local population also risk reprisal certain community national actor also important potential risk community civil society group may arise consequence engagement ddr process properly assessed managed mitigated n reputational risk ddr practitioner aware risk seen promoting impunity lenient towards individual may engaged scheme violent governance community ddr practitioner also aware risk may seen complicit abusive state policy andor behaviour particularly armed force known engage organized criminal activity pervasive corruption due diligence appropriate framework safeguard mechanism shall applied continuously address complex issue n legal risk ddr practitioner rely government donor may face additional challenge government insert condition clause grant agreement order comply security council resolution stated iddrs 211 legal framework un ddr ddr practitioner consult legal adviser applicable host state national legislation criminalizes provision support including suspected terrorist armed group designated terrorist organization information legal issue risk see section 53 module", "ProcessedSent": "n security risk possibility armed group directly targeting staffprogrammes may perceive hostile high ongoing conflict context particularly ddr process perceived associated removal livelihood social status", "SentID": 12530 }, { "ParagraphID": 3421, - "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \\n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \\n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \\n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \\n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \\n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", + "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225577,7 +225577,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3421, - "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \\n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \\n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \\n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \\n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \\n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", + "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225595,7 +225595,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3421, - "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \\n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \\n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \\n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \\n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \\n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", + "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225606,14 +225606,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.2 Risk management and implementation", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities.", + "Sentence": "\n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities.", "newParagraph": "planning design implementation monitoring ddr process organized crime context practitioner shall undertake comprehensive risk management scheme following list organized crime related risk intended assist ddr practitioner ass manage vulnerability context order prevent negative consequence n programmatic risk context ongoing conflict organized crime activity used economic powerseeking gain risk excombatants recruited continue engage criminal activity higher conflict ongoing protracted financed organized crime absence formal peace agreement ddr participant may reluctant give perceived opportunity illicit activity offer particularly reintegration opportunity limited formal informal economy overlap unresolved grievance persist n harm risk ddr process present risk reinforcing illicit activity flow may also vulnerable corruption capture ddr practitioner shall ensure process implemented manner avoids inadvertently contributing illicit flow andor retaliation armed force group engage criminal activity includes careful selection partnering institution group implement ddr process within organized crime conflict context ddr process may also present risk reinforcing extortion scheme payment cashstipends ddr participant part reinsertion assistance practitioner consider distribution payment issuance prepaid card voucher digital transfer possible reduce risk participant extorted engaged criminal activity including armed force group n security risk possibility armed group directly targeting staffprogrammes may perceive hostile high ongoing conflict context particularly ddr process perceived associated removal livelihood social status conversely ddr practitioner perceived supporting individual formerly associated criminal activity particularly engaged violence local population also risk reprisal certain community national actor also important potential risk community civil society group may arise consequence engagement ddr process properly assessed managed mitigated n reputational risk ddr practitioner aware risk seen promoting impunity lenient towards individual may engaged scheme violent governance community ddr practitioner also aware risk may seen complicit abusive state policy andor behaviour particularly armed force known engage organized criminal activity pervasive corruption due diligence appropriate framework safeguard mechanism shall applied continuously address complex issue n legal risk ddr practitioner rely government donor may face additional challenge government insert condition clause grant agreement order comply security council resolution stated iddrs 211 legal framework un ddr ddr practitioner consult legal adviser applicable host state national legislation criminalizes provision support including suspected terrorist armed group designated terrorist organization information legal issue risk see section 53 module", "ProcessedSent": "n reputational risk ddr practitioner aware risk seen promoting impunity lenient towards individual may engaged scheme violent governance community", "SentID": 12533 }, { "ParagraphID": 3421, - "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \\n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \\n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \\n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \\n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \\n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", + "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225631,7 +225631,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3421, - "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \\n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \\n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \\n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \\n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \\n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", + "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225649,7 +225649,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3421, - "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \\n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \\n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \\n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \\n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \\n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", + "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225660,14 +225660,14 @@ "Heading2": "6.2 Risk management and implementation", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions.", + "Sentence": "\n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions.", "newParagraph": "planning design implementation monitoring ddr process organized crime context practitioner shall undertake comprehensive risk management scheme following list organized crime related risk intended assist ddr practitioner ass manage vulnerability context order prevent negative consequence n programmatic risk context ongoing conflict organized crime activity used economic powerseeking gain risk excombatants recruited continue engage criminal activity higher conflict ongoing protracted financed organized crime absence formal peace agreement ddr participant may reluctant give perceived opportunity illicit activity offer particularly reintegration opportunity limited formal informal economy overlap unresolved grievance persist n harm risk ddr process present risk reinforcing illicit activity flow may also vulnerable corruption capture ddr practitioner shall ensure process implemented manner avoids inadvertently contributing illicit flow andor retaliation armed force group engage criminal activity includes careful selection partnering institution group implement ddr process within organized crime conflict context ddr process may also present risk reinforcing extortion scheme payment cashstipends ddr participant part reinsertion assistance practitioner consider distribution payment issuance prepaid card voucher digital transfer possible reduce risk participant extorted engaged criminal activity including armed force group n security risk possibility armed group directly targeting staffprogrammes may perceive hostile high ongoing conflict context particularly ddr process perceived associated removal livelihood social status conversely ddr practitioner perceived supporting individual formerly associated criminal activity particularly engaged violence local population also risk reprisal certain community national actor also important potential risk community civil society group may arise consequence engagement ddr process properly assessed managed mitigated n reputational risk ddr practitioner aware risk seen promoting impunity lenient towards individual may engaged scheme violent governance community ddr practitioner also aware risk may seen complicit abusive state policy andor behaviour particularly armed force known engage organized criminal activity pervasive corruption due diligence appropriate framework safeguard mechanism shall applied continuously address complex issue n legal risk ddr practitioner rely government donor may face additional challenge government insert condition clause grant agreement order comply security council resolution stated iddrs 211 legal framework un ddr ddr practitioner consult legal adviser applicable host state national legislation criminalizes provision support including suspected terrorist armed group designated terrorist organization information legal issue risk see section 53 module", "ProcessedSent": "n legal risk ddr practitioner rely government donor may face additional challenge government insert condition clause grant agreement order comply security council resolution", "SentID": 12536 }, { "ParagraphID": 3421, - "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \\n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \\n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \\n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \\n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \\n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", + "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -225685,7 +225685,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3421, - "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \\n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \\n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \\n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \\n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \\n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", + "Paragraph": "In the planning, design, implementation and monitoring of DDR processes in organized crime contexts, practitioners shall undertake a comprehensive risk management scheme. The following list of organized crime\u2013related risks is intended to assist DDR practitioners to assess and manage vulnerabilities in such contexts in order to prevent negative consequences. \n Programmatic risk: In contexts of ongoing conflict, organized crime activities can be used to further both economic and power-seeking gains. The risk that ex-combatants will be re- recruited or (continue to) engage in criminal activity is higher when conflict is ongoing, protracted or financed through organized crime. In the absence of a formal peace agreement, DDR participants may be more reluctant to give up the perceived opportunities that illicit activities offer, particularly when reintegration opportunities are limited, formal and informal economies overlap, and unresolved grievances persist. \n \u2018Do no harm\u2019 risk: Because DDR processes not only present the risk of reinforcing illicit activities and flows, but may also be vulnerable to corruption and capture, DDR practitioners shall ensure that processes are implemented in a manner that avoids inadvertently contributing to illicit flows and\/or retaliation by armed forces and groups that engage in criminal activities. This includes the careful selection of partnering institutions and groups to implement DDR processes. Within an organized crime\u2013conflict context, DDR processes may also present the risk of reinforcing extortion schemes through the payment of cash\/stipends to DDR participants as part of reinsertion assistance. Practitioners should consider the distribution of payments through the issuance of pre-paid cards, vouchers or digital transfers where possible, to reduce the risk that participants will be extorted by those engaged in criminal activities, including armed forces and groups. \n Security risk: The possibility of armed groups directly targeting staff\/programmes they may perceive as hostile is high in ongoing conflict contexts, particularly if DDR processes are perceived to be associated with the removal of livelihoods and social status. Conversely, DDR practitioners who are perceived to be supporting individuals (formerly) associated with criminal activities, particularly those who engaged in violence against local populations, can also be at risk of reprisals by certain communities or national actors. It is also important that potential risks to communities and civil society groups that may arise as a consequence of their engagement with DDR processes be properly assessed, managed and mitigated. \n Reputational risk: DDR practitioners should be aware of the risk of being seen as promoting impunity or being lenient towards individuals who may have engaged in schemes of violent governance against communities. DDR practitioners should also be aware of the risk that they may be seen as being complicit in abusive State policies and\/or behaviour, particularly if armed forces are known to engage in organized criminal activities and pervasive corruption. Due diligence and appropriate frameworks, safeguards and mechanisms shall be applied to continuously address these complex issues. \n Legal risks: DDR practitioners who rely on Government donors may face additional challenges if these Governments insert conditions or clauses into their grant agreements in order to comply with Security Council resolutions. As stated in IDDRS 2.11 on The Legal Framework for UN DDR, DDR practitioners should consult with their legal adviser if applicable host State national legislation criminalizes the provision of support, including to suspected terrorists or armed groups designated as terrorist organizations. For more information on legal issues and risks, see section 5.3 of this module.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -226225,7 +226225,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3429, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the considerations laid out in IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, DDR practitioners should consider the following key factors when developing disarmament operations as part of DDR programmes in contexts of organized crime: \\nTransparency mechanisms: Specifically, the collection and destruction of weapons, ammunition and explosives should have accounting and monitoring measures in place to prevent diversion. This includes recordkeeping of weapons, ammunition and explosives collected during the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Transparency in the disposal of weapons and ammunition collected from former conflict parties is key to building trust in the DDR programme. Destruction should not take place if there is a risk that judicial evidence may be lost as a result of the disposal, and especially where there is a risk of linkages to organized crime activities. Recordkeeping and tracing of weapons should be mandatory, and of ammunition where feasible. The use of digital technology should be deployed during recordkeeping, where possible, to allow for weapons tracing from the time of retrieval and throughout the management chain, enhancing accountability. For further information, see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament. \\nLink to wider SSR and arms control: Law enforcement agencies in conflict-affected countries often lack the capacity to investigate and prosecute weapons trafficking offenders and to collect and secure illegal weapons and ammunition. DDR practitioners should therefore align their efforts with broader arms control initiatives to ensure that weapons and ammunition management capacity deficits do not further contribute to illicit flows and the perpetration of armed violence. Understanding arms trafficking dynamics, achieved by ensuring collected weapons are marked and thus traceable, is critical to countering illicit arms flows. In the absence of this understanding, illicit flows may continue to provide arms to conflict parties and may continue to provide traffickers with incentives to fuel armed conflicts in order to create or expand their illicit arms market. For further information, see IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammunition Management and IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the considerations laid out in IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, DDR practitioners should consider the following key factors when developing disarmament operations as part of DDR programmes in contexts of organized crime: \nTransparency mechanisms: Specifically, the collection and destruction of weapons, ammunition and explosives should have accounting and monitoring measures in place to prevent diversion. This includes recordkeeping of weapons, ammunition and explosives collected during the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Transparency in the disposal of weapons and ammunition collected from former conflict parties is key to building trust in the DDR programme. Destruction should not take place if there is a risk that judicial evidence may be lost as a result of the disposal, and especially where there is a risk of linkages to organized crime activities. Recordkeeping and tracing of weapons should be mandatory, and of ammunition where feasible. The use of digital technology should be deployed during recordkeeping, where possible, to allow for weapons tracing from the time of retrieval and throughout the management chain, enhancing accountability. For further information, see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament. \nLink to wider SSR and arms control: Law enforcement agencies in conflict-affected countries often lack the capacity to investigate and prosecute weapons trafficking offenders and to collect and secure illegal weapons and ammunition. DDR practitioners should therefore align their efforts with broader arms control initiatives to ensure that weapons and ammunition management capacity deficits do not further contribute to illicit flows and the perpetration of armed violence. Understanding arms trafficking dynamics, achieved by ensuring collected weapons are marked and thus traceable, is critical to countering illicit arms flows. In the absence of this understanding, illicit flows may continue to provide arms to conflict parties and may continue to provide traffickers with incentives to fuel armed conflicts in order to create or expand their illicit arms market. For further information, see IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammunition Management and IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -226236,14 +226236,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1 Disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "In addition to the considerations laid out in IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, DDR practitioners should consider the following key factors when developing disarmament operations as part of DDR programmes in contexts of organized crime: \\nTransparency mechanisms: Specifically, the collection and destruction of weapons, ammunition and explosives should have accounting and monitoring measures in place to prevent diversion.", + "Sentence": "In addition to the considerations laid out in IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, DDR practitioners should consider the following key factors when developing disarmament operations as part of DDR programmes in contexts of organized crime: \nTransparency mechanisms: Specifically, the collection and destruction of weapons, ammunition and explosives should have accounting and monitoring measures in place to prevent diversion.", "newParagraph": "addition consideration laid iddrs 410 disarmament ddr practitioner consider following key factor developing disarmament operation part ddr programme context organized crime ntransparency mechanism specifically collection destruction weapon ammunition explosive accounting monitoring measure place prevent diversion includes recordkeeping weapon ammunition explosive collected disarmament phase ddr programme transparency disposal weapon ammunition collected former conflict party key building trust ddr programme destruction take place risk judicial evidence may lost result disposal especially risk linkage organized crime activity recordkeeping tracing weapon mandatory ammunition feasible use digital technology deployed recordkeeping possible allow weapon tracing time retrieval throughout management chain enhancing accountability information see iddrs 410 disarmament nlink wider ssr arm control law enforcement agency conflictaffected country often lack capacity investigate prosecute weapon trafficking offender collect secure illegal weapon ammunition ddr practitioner therefore align effort broader arm control initiative ensure weapon ammunition management capacity deficit contribute illicit flow perpetration armed violence understanding arm trafficking dynamic achieved ensuring collected weapon marked thus traceable critical countering illicit arm flow absence understanding illicit flow may continue provide arm conflict party may continue provide trafficker incentive fuel armed conflict order create expand illicit arm market information see iddrs 411 transitional weapon ammunition management iddrs 610 ddr security sector reform", "ProcessedSent": "addition consideration laid iddrs 410 disarmament ddr practitioner consider following key factor developing disarmament operation part ddr programme context organized crime ntransparency mechanism specifically collection destruction weapon ammunition explosive accounting monitoring measure place prevent diversion", "SentID": 12568 }, { "ParagraphID": 3429, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the considerations laid out in IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, DDR practitioners should consider the following key factors when developing disarmament operations as part of DDR programmes in contexts of organized crime: \\nTransparency mechanisms: Specifically, the collection and destruction of weapons, ammunition and explosives should have accounting and monitoring measures in place to prevent diversion. This includes recordkeeping of weapons, ammunition and explosives collected during the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Transparency in the disposal of weapons and ammunition collected from former conflict parties is key to building trust in the DDR programme. Destruction should not take place if there is a risk that judicial evidence may be lost as a result of the disposal, and especially where there is a risk of linkages to organized crime activities. Recordkeeping and tracing of weapons should be mandatory, and of ammunition where feasible. The use of digital technology should be deployed during recordkeeping, where possible, to allow for weapons tracing from the time of retrieval and throughout the management chain, enhancing accountability. For further information, see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament. \\nLink to wider SSR and arms control: Law enforcement agencies in conflict-affected countries often lack the capacity to investigate and prosecute weapons trafficking offenders and to collect and secure illegal weapons and ammunition. DDR practitioners should therefore align their efforts with broader arms control initiatives to ensure that weapons and ammunition management capacity deficits do not further contribute to illicit flows and the perpetration of armed violence. Understanding arms trafficking dynamics, achieved by ensuring collected weapons are marked and thus traceable, is critical to countering illicit arms flows. In the absence of this understanding, illicit flows may continue to provide arms to conflict parties and may continue to provide traffickers with incentives to fuel armed conflicts in order to create or expand their illicit arms market. For further information, see IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammunition Management and IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the considerations laid out in IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, DDR practitioners should consider the following key factors when developing disarmament operations as part of DDR programmes in contexts of organized crime: \nTransparency mechanisms: Specifically, the collection and destruction of weapons, ammunition and explosives should have accounting and monitoring measures in place to prevent diversion. This includes recordkeeping of weapons, ammunition and explosives collected during the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Transparency in the disposal of weapons and ammunition collected from former conflict parties is key to building trust in the DDR programme. Destruction should not take place if there is a risk that judicial evidence may be lost as a result of the disposal, and especially where there is a risk of linkages to organized crime activities. Recordkeeping and tracing of weapons should be mandatory, and of ammunition where feasible. The use of digital technology should be deployed during recordkeeping, where possible, to allow for weapons tracing from the time of retrieval and throughout the management chain, enhancing accountability. For further information, see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament. \nLink to wider SSR and arms control: Law enforcement agencies in conflict-affected countries often lack the capacity to investigate and prosecute weapons trafficking offenders and to collect and secure illegal weapons and ammunition. DDR practitioners should therefore align their efforts with broader arms control initiatives to ensure that weapons and ammunition management capacity deficits do not further contribute to illicit flows and the perpetration of armed violence. Understanding arms trafficking dynamics, achieved by ensuring collected weapons are marked and thus traceable, is critical to countering illicit arms flows. In the absence of this understanding, illicit flows may continue to provide arms to conflict parties and may continue to provide traffickers with incentives to fuel armed conflicts in order to create or expand their illicit arms market. For further information, see IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammunition Management and IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -226261,7 +226261,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3429, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the considerations laid out in IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, DDR practitioners should consider the following key factors when developing disarmament operations as part of DDR programmes in contexts of organized crime: \\nTransparency mechanisms: Specifically, the collection and destruction of weapons, ammunition and explosives should have accounting and monitoring measures in place to prevent diversion. This includes recordkeeping of weapons, ammunition and explosives collected during the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Transparency in the disposal of weapons and ammunition collected from former conflict parties is key to building trust in the DDR programme. Destruction should not take place if there is a risk that judicial evidence may be lost as a result of the disposal, and especially where there is a risk of linkages to organized crime activities. Recordkeeping and tracing of weapons should be mandatory, and of ammunition where feasible. The use of digital technology should be deployed during recordkeeping, where possible, to allow for weapons tracing from the time of retrieval and throughout the management chain, enhancing accountability. For further information, see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament. \\nLink to wider SSR and arms control: Law enforcement agencies in conflict-affected countries often lack the capacity to investigate and prosecute weapons trafficking offenders and to collect and secure illegal weapons and ammunition. DDR practitioners should therefore align their efforts with broader arms control initiatives to ensure that weapons and ammunition management capacity deficits do not further contribute to illicit flows and the perpetration of armed violence. Understanding arms trafficking dynamics, achieved by ensuring collected weapons are marked and thus traceable, is critical to countering illicit arms flows. In the absence of this understanding, illicit flows may continue to provide arms to conflict parties and may continue to provide traffickers with incentives to fuel armed conflicts in order to create or expand their illicit arms market. For further information, see IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammunition Management and IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the considerations laid out in IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, DDR practitioners should consider the following key factors when developing disarmament operations as part of DDR programmes in contexts of organized crime: \nTransparency mechanisms: Specifically, the collection and destruction of weapons, ammunition and explosives should have accounting and monitoring measures in place to prevent diversion. This includes recordkeeping of weapons, ammunition and explosives collected during the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Transparency in the disposal of weapons and ammunition collected from former conflict parties is key to building trust in the DDR programme. Destruction should not take place if there is a risk that judicial evidence may be lost as a result of the disposal, and especially where there is a risk of linkages to organized crime activities. Recordkeeping and tracing of weapons should be mandatory, and of ammunition where feasible. The use of digital technology should be deployed during recordkeeping, where possible, to allow for weapons tracing from the time of retrieval and throughout the management chain, enhancing accountability. For further information, see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament. \nLink to wider SSR and arms control: Law enforcement agencies in conflict-affected countries often lack the capacity to investigate and prosecute weapons trafficking offenders and to collect and secure illegal weapons and ammunition. DDR practitioners should therefore align their efforts with broader arms control initiatives to ensure that weapons and ammunition management capacity deficits do not further contribute to illicit flows and the perpetration of armed violence. Understanding arms trafficking dynamics, achieved by ensuring collected weapons are marked and thus traceable, is critical to countering illicit arms flows. In the absence of this understanding, illicit flows may continue to provide arms to conflict parties and may continue to provide traffickers with incentives to fuel armed conflicts in order to create or expand their illicit arms market. For further information, see IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammunition Management and IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -226279,7 +226279,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3429, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the considerations laid out in IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, DDR practitioners should consider the following key factors when developing disarmament operations as part of DDR programmes in contexts of organized crime: \\nTransparency mechanisms: Specifically, the collection and destruction of weapons, ammunition and explosives should have accounting and monitoring measures in place to prevent diversion. This includes recordkeeping of weapons, ammunition and explosives collected during the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Transparency in the disposal of weapons and ammunition collected from former conflict parties is key to building trust in the DDR programme. Destruction should not take place if there is a risk that judicial evidence may be lost as a result of the disposal, and especially where there is a risk of linkages to organized crime activities. Recordkeeping and tracing of weapons should be mandatory, and of ammunition where feasible. The use of digital technology should be deployed during recordkeeping, where possible, to allow for weapons tracing from the time of retrieval and throughout the management chain, enhancing accountability. For further information, see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament. \\nLink to wider SSR and arms control: Law enforcement agencies in conflict-affected countries often lack the capacity to investigate and prosecute weapons trafficking offenders and to collect and secure illegal weapons and ammunition. DDR practitioners should therefore align their efforts with broader arms control initiatives to ensure that weapons and ammunition management capacity deficits do not further contribute to illicit flows and the perpetration of armed violence. Understanding arms trafficking dynamics, achieved by ensuring collected weapons are marked and thus traceable, is critical to countering illicit arms flows. In the absence of this understanding, illicit flows may continue to provide arms to conflict parties and may continue to provide traffickers with incentives to fuel armed conflicts in order to create or expand their illicit arms market. For further information, see IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammunition Management and IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the considerations laid out in IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, DDR practitioners should consider the following key factors when developing disarmament operations as part of DDR programmes in contexts of organized crime: \nTransparency mechanisms: Specifically, the collection and destruction of weapons, ammunition and explosives should have accounting and monitoring measures in place to prevent diversion. This includes recordkeeping of weapons, ammunition and explosives collected during the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Transparency in the disposal of weapons and ammunition collected from former conflict parties is key to building trust in the DDR programme. Destruction should not take place if there is a risk that judicial evidence may be lost as a result of the disposal, and especially where there is a risk of linkages to organized crime activities. Recordkeeping and tracing of weapons should be mandatory, and of ammunition where feasible. The use of digital technology should be deployed during recordkeeping, where possible, to allow for weapons tracing from the time of retrieval and throughout the management chain, enhancing accountability. For further information, see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament. \nLink to wider SSR and arms control: Law enforcement agencies in conflict-affected countries often lack the capacity to investigate and prosecute weapons trafficking offenders and to collect and secure illegal weapons and ammunition. DDR practitioners should therefore align their efforts with broader arms control initiatives to ensure that weapons and ammunition management capacity deficits do not further contribute to illicit flows and the perpetration of armed violence. Understanding arms trafficking dynamics, achieved by ensuring collected weapons are marked and thus traceable, is critical to countering illicit arms flows. In the absence of this understanding, illicit flows may continue to provide arms to conflict parties and may continue to provide traffickers with incentives to fuel armed conflicts in order to create or expand their illicit arms market. For further information, see IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammunition Management and IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -226297,7 +226297,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3429, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the considerations laid out in IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, DDR practitioners should consider the following key factors when developing disarmament operations as part of DDR programmes in contexts of organized crime: \\nTransparency mechanisms: Specifically, the collection and destruction of weapons, ammunition and explosives should have accounting and monitoring measures in place to prevent diversion. This includes recordkeeping of weapons, ammunition and explosives collected during the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Transparency in the disposal of weapons and ammunition collected from former conflict parties is key to building trust in the DDR programme. Destruction should not take place if there is a risk that judicial evidence may be lost as a result of the disposal, and especially where there is a risk of linkages to organized crime activities. Recordkeeping and tracing of weapons should be mandatory, and of ammunition where feasible. The use of digital technology should be deployed during recordkeeping, where possible, to allow for weapons tracing from the time of retrieval and throughout the management chain, enhancing accountability. For further information, see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament. \\nLink to wider SSR and arms control: Law enforcement agencies in conflict-affected countries often lack the capacity to investigate and prosecute weapons trafficking offenders and to collect and secure illegal weapons and ammunition. DDR practitioners should therefore align their efforts with broader arms control initiatives to ensure that weapons and ammunition management capacity deficits do not further contribute to illicit flows and the perpetration of armed violence. Understanding arms trafficking dynamics, achieved by ensuring collected weapons are marked and thus traceable, is critical to countering illicit arms flows. In the absence of this understanding, illicit flows may continue to provide arms to conflict parties and may continue to provide traffickers with incentives to fuel armed conflicts in order to create or expand their illicit arms market. For further information, see IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammunition Management and IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the considerations laid out in IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, DDR practitioners should consider the following key factors when developing disarmament operations as part of DDR programmes in contexts of organized crime: \nTransparency mechanisms: Specifically, the collection and destruction of weapons, ammunition and explosives should have accounting and monitoring measures in place to prevent diversion. This includes recordkeeping of weapons, ammunition and explosives collected during the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Transparency in the disposal of weapons and ammunition collected from former conflict parties is key to building trust in the DDR programme. Destruction should not take place if there is a risk that judicial evidence may be lost as a result of the disposal, and especially where there is a risk of linkages to organized crime activities. Recordkeeping and tracing of weapons should be mandatory, and of ammunition where feasible. The use of digital technology should be deployed during recordkeeping, where possible, to allow for weapons tracing from the time of retrieval and throughout the management chain, enhancing accountability. For further information, see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament. \nLink to wider SSR and arms control: Law enforcement agencies in conflict-affected countries often lack the capacity to investigate and prosecute weapons trafficking offenders and to collect and secure illegal weapons and ammunition. DDR practitioners should therefore align their efforts with broader arms control initiatives to ensure that weapons and ammunition management capacity deficits do not further contribute to illicit flows and the perpetration of armed violence. Understanding arms trafficking dynamics, achieved by ensuring collected weapons are marked and thus traceable, is critical to countering illicit arms flows. In the absence of this understanding, illicit flows may continue to provide arms to conflict parties and may continue to provide traffickers with incentives to fuel armed conflicts in order to create or expand their illicit arms market. For further information, see IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammunition Management and IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -226315,7 +226315,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3429, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the considerations laid out in IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, DDR practitioners should consider the following key factors when developing disarmament operations as part of DDR programmes in contexts of organized crime: \\nTransparency mechanisms: Specifically, the collection and destruction of weapons, ammunition and explosives should have accounting and monitoring measures in place to prevent diversion. This includes recordkeeping of weapons, ammunition and explosives collected during the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Transparency in the disposal of weapons and ammunition collected from former conflict parties is key to building trust in the DDR programme. Destruction should not take place if there is a risk that judicial evidence may be lost as a result of the disposal, and especially where there is a risk of linkages to organized crime activities. Recordkeeping and tracing of weapons should be mandatory, and of ammunition where feasible. The use of digital technology should be deployed during recordkeeping, where possible, to allow for weapons tracing from the time of retrieval and throughout the management chain, enhancing accountability. For further information, see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament. \\nLink to wider SSR and arms control: Law enforcement agencies in conflict-affected countries often lack the capacity to investigate and prosecute weapons trafficking offenders and to collect and secure illegal weapons and ammunition. DDR practitioners should therefore align their efforts with broader arms control initiatives to ensure that weapons and ammunition management capacity deficits do not further contribute to illicit flows and the perpetration of armed violence. Understanding arms trafficking dynamics, achieved by ensuring collected weapons are marked and thus traceable, is critical to countering illicit arms flows. In the absence of this understanding, illicit flows may continue to provide arms to conflict parties and may continue to provide traffickers with incentives to fuel armed conflicts in order to create or expand their illicit arms market. For further information, see IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammunition Management and IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the considerations laid out in IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, DDR practitioners should consider the following key factors when developing disarmament operations as part of DDR programmes in contexts of organized crime: \nTransparency mechanisms: Specifically, the collection and destruction of weapons, ammunition and explosives should have accounting and monitoring measures in place to prevent diversion. This includes recordkeeping of weapons, ammunition and explosives collected during the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Transparency in the disposal of weapons and ammunition collected from former conflict parties is key to building trust in the DDR programme. Destruction should not take place if there is a risk that judicial evidence may be lost as a result of the disposal, and especially where there is a risk of linkages to organized crime activities. Recordkeeping and tracing of weapons should be mandatory, and of ammunition where feasible. The use of digital technology should be deployed during recordkeeping, where possible, to allow for weapons tracing from the time of retrieval and throughout the management chain, enhancing accountability. For further information, see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament. \nLink to wider SSR and arms control: Law enforcement agencies in conflict-affected countries often lack the capacity to investigate and prosecute weapons trafficking offenders and to collect and secure illegal weapons and ammunition. DDR practitioners should therefore align their efforts with broader arms control initiatives to ensure that weapons and ammunition management capacity deficits do not further contribute to illicit flows and the perpetration of armed violence. Understanding arms trafficking dynamics, achieved by ensuring collected weapons are marked and thus traceable, is critical to countering illicit arms flows. In the absence of this understanding, illicit flows may continue to provide arms to conflict parties and may continue to provide traffickers with incentives to fuel armed conflicts in order to create or expand their illicit arms market. For further information, see IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammunition Management and IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -226333,7 +226333,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3429, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the considerations laid out in IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, DDR practitioners should consider the following key factors when developing disarmament operations as part of DDR programmes in contexts of organized crime: \\nTransparency mechanisms: Specifically, the collection and destruction of weapons, ammunition and explosives should have accounting and monitoring measures in place to prevent diversion. This includes recordkeeping of weapons, ammunition and explosives collected during the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Transparency in the disposal of weapons and ammunition collected from former conflict parties is key to building trust in the DDR programme. Destruction should not take place if there is a risk that judicial evidence may be lost as a result of the disposal, and especially where there is a risk of linkages to organized crime activities. Recordkeeping and tracing of weapons should be mandatory, and of ammunition where feasible. The use of digital technology should be deployed during recordkeeping, where possible, to allow for weapons tracing from the time of retrieval and throughout the management chain, enhancing accountability. For further information, see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament. \\nLink to wider SSR and arms control: Law enforcement agencies in conflict-affected countries often lack the capacity to investigate and prosecute weapons trafficking offenders and to collect and secure illegal weapons and ammunition. DDR practitioners should therefore align their efforts with broader arms control initiatives to ensure that weapons and ammunition management capacity deficits do not further contribute to illicit flows and the perpetration of armed violence. Understanding arms trafficking dynamics, achieved by ensuring collected weapons are marked and thus traceable, is critical to countering illicit arms flows. In the absence of this understanding, illicit flows may continue to provide arms to conflict parties and may continue to provide traffickers with incentives to fuel armed conflicts in order to create or expand their illicit arms market. For further information, see IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammunition Management and IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the considerations laid out in IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, DDR practitioners should consider the following key factors when developing disarmament operations as part of DDR programmes in contexts of organized crime: \nTransparency mechanisms: Specifically, the collection and destruction of weapons, ammunition and explosives should have accounting and monitoring measures in place to prevent diversion. This includes recordkeeping of weapons, ammunition and explosives collected during the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Transparency in the disposal of weapons and ammunition collected from former conflict parties is key to building trust in the DDR programme. Destruction should not take place if there is a risk that judicial evidence may be lost as a result of the disposal, and especially where there is a risk of linkages to organized crime activities. Recordkeeping and tracing of weapons should be mandatory, and of ammunition where feasible. The use of digital technology should be deployed during recordkeeping, where possible, to allow for weapons tracing from the time of retrieval and throughout the management chain, enhancing accountability. For further information, see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament. \nLink to wider SSR and arms control: Law enforcement agencies in conflict-affected countries often lack the capacity to investigate and prosecute weapons trafficking offenders and to collect and secure illegal weapons and ammunition. DDR practitioners should therefore align their efforts with broader arms control initiatives to ensure that weapons and ammunition management capacity deficits do not further contribute to illicit flows and the perpetration of armed violence. Understanding arms trafficking dynamics, achieved by ensuring collected weapons are marked and thus traceable, is critical to countering illicit arms flows. In the absence of this understanding, illicit flows may continue to provide arms to conflict parties and may continue to provide traffickers with incentives to fuel armed conflicts in order to create or expand their illicit arms market. For further information, see IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammunition Management and IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -226351,7 +226351,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3429, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the considerations laid out in IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, DDR practitioners should consider the following key factors when developing disarmament operations as part of DDR programmes in contexts of organized crime: \\nTransparency mechanisms: Specifically, the collection and destruction of weapons, ammunition and explosives should have accounting and monitoring measures in place to prevent diversion. This includes recordkeeping of weapons, ammunition and explosives collected during the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Transparency in the disposal of weapons and ammunition collected from former conflict parties is key to building trust in the DDR programme. Destruction should not take place if there is a risk that judicial evidence may be lost as a result of the disposal, and especially where there is a risk of linkages to organized crime activities. Recordkeeping and tracing of weapons should be mandatory, and of ammunition where feasible. The use of digital technology should be deployed during recordkeeping, where possible, to allow for weapons tracing from the time of retrieval and throughout the management chain, enhancing accountability. For further information, see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament. \\nLink to wider SSR and arms control: Law enforcement agencies in conflict-affected countries often lack the capacity to investigate and prosecute weapons trafficking offenders and to collect and secure illegal weapons and ammunition. DDR practitioners should therefore align their efforts with broader arms control initiatives to ensure that weapons and ammunition management capacity deficits do not further contribute to illicit flows and the perpetration of armed violence. Understanding arms trafficking dynamics, achieved by ensuring collected weapons are marked and thus traceable, is critical to countering illicit arms flows. In the absence of this understanding, illicit flows may continue to provide arms to conflict parties and may continue to provide traffickers with incentives to fuel armed conflicts in order to create or expand their illicit arms market. For further information, see IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammunition Management and IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the considerations laid out in IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, DDR practitioners should consider the following key factors when developing disarmament operations as part of DDR programmes in contexts of organized crime: \nTransparency mechanisms: Specifically, the collection and destruction of weapons, ammunition and explosives should have accounting and monitoring measures in place to prevent diversion. This includes recordkeeping of weapons, ammunition and explosives collected during the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Transparency in the disposal of weapons and ammunition collected from former conflict parties is key to building trust in the DDR programme. Destruction should not take place if there is a risk that judicial evidence may be lost as a result of the disposal, and especially where there is a risk of linkages to organized crime activities. Recordkeeping and tracing of weapons should be mandatory, and of ammunition where feasible. The use of digital technology should be deployed during recordkeeping, where possible, to allow for weapons tracing from the time of retrieval and throughout the management chain, enhancing accountability. For further information, see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament. \nLink to wider SSR and arms control: Law enforcement agencies in conflict-affected countries often lack the capacity to investigate and prosecute weapons trafficking offenders and to collect and secure illegal weapons and ammunition. DDR practitioners should therefore align their efforts with broader arms control initiatives to ensure that weapons and ammunition management capacity deficits do not further contribute to illicit flows and the perpetration of armed violence. Understanding arms trafficking dynamics, achieved by ensuring collected weapons are marked and thus traceable, is critical to countering illicit arms flows. In the absence of this understanding, illicit flows may continue to provide arms to conflict parties and may continue to provide traffickers with incentives to fuel armed conflicts in order to create or expand their illicit arms market. For further information, see IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammunition Management and IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -226362,14 +226362,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1 Disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\nLink to wider SSR and arms control: Law enforcement agencies in conflict-affected countries often lack the capacity to investigate and prosecute weapons trafficking offenders and to collect and secure illegal weapons and ammunition.", + "Sentence": "\nLink to wider SSR and arms control: Law enforcement agencies in conflict-affected countries often lack the capacity to investigate and prosecute weapons trafficking offenders and to collect and secure illegal weapons and ammunition.", "newParagraph": "addition consideration laid iddrs 410 disarmament ddr practitioner consider following key factor developing disarmament operation part ddr programme context organized crime ntransparency mechanism specifically collection destruction weapon ammunition explosive accounting monitoring measure place prevent diversion includes recordkeeping weapon ammunition explosive collected disarmament phase ddr programme transparency disposal weapon ammunition collected former conflict party key building trust ddr programme destruction take place risk judicial evidence may lost result disposal especially risk linkage organized crime activity recordkeeping tracing weapon mandatory ammunition feasible use digital technology deployed recordkeeping possible allow weapon tracing time retrieval throughout management chain enhancing accountability information see iddrs 410 disarmament nlink wider ssr arm control law enforcement agency conflictaffected country often lack capacity investigate prosecute weapon trafficking offender collect secure illegal weapon ammunition ddr practitioner therefore align effort broader arm control initiative ensure weapon ammunition management capacity deficit contribute illicit flow perpetration armed violence understanding arm trafficking dynamic achieved ensuring collected weapon marked thus traceable critical countering illicit arm flow absence understanding illicit flow may continue provide arm conflict party may continue provide trafficker incentive fuel armed conflict order create expand illicit arm market information see iddrs 411 transitional weapon ammunition management iddrs 610 ddr security sector reform", "ProcessedSent": "nlink wider ssr arm control law enforcement agency conflictaffected country often lack capacity investigate prosecute weapon trafficking offender collect secure illegal weapon ammunition", "SentID": 12575 }, { "ParagraphID": 3429, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the considerations laid out in IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, DDR practitioners should consider the following key factors when developing disarmament operations as part of DDR programmes in contexts of organized crime: \\nTransparency mechanisms: Specifically, the collection and destruction of weapons, ammunition and explosives should have accounting and monitoring measures in place to prevent diversion. This includes recordkeeping of weapons, ammunition and explosives collected during the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Transparency in the disposal of weapons and ammunition collected from former conflict parties is key to building trust in the DDR programme. Destruction should not take place if there is a risk that judicial evidence may be lost as a result of the disposal, and especially where there is a risk of linkages to organized crime activities. Recordkeeping and tracing of weapons should be mandatory, and of ammunition where feasible. The use of digital technology should be deployed during recordkeeping, where possible, to allow for weapons tracing from the time of retrieval and throughout the management chain, enhancing accountability. For further information, see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament. \\nLink to wider SSR and arms control: Law enforcement agencies in conflict-affected countries often lack the capacity to investigate and prosecute weapons trafficking offenders and to collect and secure illegal weapons and ammunition. DDR practitioners should therefore align their efforts with broader arms control initiatives to ensure that weapons and ammunition management capacity deficits do not further contribute to illicit flows and the perpetration of armed violence. Understanding arms trafficking dynamics, achieved by ensuring collected weapons are marked and thus traceable, is critical to countering illicit arms flows. In the absence of this understanding, illicit flows may continue to provide arms to conflict parties and may continue to provide traffickers with incentives to fuel armed conflicts in order to create or expand their illicit arms market. For further information, see IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammunition Management and IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the considerations laid out in IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, DDR practitioners should consider the following key factors when developing disarmament operations as part of DDR programmes in contexts of organized crime: \nTransparency mechanisms: Specifically, the collection and destruction of weapons, ammunition and explosives should have accounting and monitoring measures in place to prevent diversion. This includes recordkeeping of weapons, ammunition and explosives collected during the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Transparency in the disposal of weapons and ammunition collected from former conflict parties is key to building trust in the DDR programme. Destruction should not take place if there is a risk that judicial evidence may be lost as a result of the disposal, and especially where there is a risk of linkages to organized crime activities. Recordkeeping and tracing of weapons should be mandatory, and of ammunition where feasible. The use of digital technology should be deployed during recordkeeping, where possible, to allow for weapons tracing from the time of retrieval and throughout the management chain, enhancing accountability. For further information, see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament. \nLink to wider SSR and arms control: Law enforcement agencies in conflict-affected countries often lack the capacity to investigate and prosecute weapons trafficking offenders and to collect and secure illegal weapons and ammunition. DDR practitioners should therefore align their efforts with broader arms control initiatives to ensure that weapons and ammunition management capacity deficits do not further contribute to illicit flows and the perpetration of armed violence. Understanding arms trafficking dynamics, achieved by ensuring collected weapons are marked and thus traceable, is critical to countering illicit arms flows. In the absence of this understanding, illicit flows may continue to provide arms to conflict parties and may continue to provide traffickers with incentives to fuel armed conflicts in order to create or expand their illicit arms market. For further information, see IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammunition Management and IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -226387,7 +226387,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3429, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the considerations laid out in IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, DDR practitioners should consider the following key factors when developing disarmament operations as part of DDR programmes in contexts of organized crime: \\nTransparency mechanisms: Specifically, the collection and destruction of weapons, ammunition and explosives should have accounting and monitoring measures in place to prevent diversion. This includes recordkeeping of weapons, ammunition and explosives collected during the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Transparency in the disposal of weapons and ammunition collected from former conflict parties is key to building trust in the DDR programme. Destruction should not take place if there is a risk that judicial evidence may be lost as a result of the disposal, and especially where there is a risk of linkages to organized crime activities. Recordkeeping and tracing of weapons should be mandatory, and of ammunition where feasible. The use of digital technology should be deployed during recordkeeping, where possible, to allow for weapons tracing from the time of retrieval and throughout the management chain, enhancing accountability. For further information, see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament. \\nLink to wider SSR and arms control: Law enforcement agencies in conflict-affected countries often lack the capacity to investigate and prosecute weapons trafficking offenders and to collect and secure illegal weapons and ammunition. DDR practitioners should therefore align their efforts with broader arms control initiatives to ensure that weapons and ammunition management capacity deficits do not further contribute to illicit flows and the perpetration of armed violence. Understanding arms trafficking dynamics, achieved by ensuring collected weapons are marked and thus traceable, is critical to countering illicit arms flows. In the absence of this understanding, illicit flows may continue to provide arms to conflict parties and may continue to provide traffickers with incentives to fuel armed conflicts in order to create or expand their illicit arms market. For further information, see IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammunition Management and IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the considerations laid out in IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, DDR practitioners should consider the following key factors when developing disarmament operations as part of DDR programmes in contexts of organized crime: \nTransparency mechanisms: Specifically, the collection and destruction of weapons, ammunition and explosives should have accounting and monitoring measures in place to prevent diversion. This includes recordkeeping of weapons, ammunition and explosives collected during the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Transparency in the disposal of weapons and ammunition collected from former conflict parties is key to building trust in the DDR programme. Destruction should not take place if there is a risk that judicial evidence may be lost as a result of the disposal, and especially where there is a risk of linkages to organized crime activities. Recordkeeping and tracing of weapons should be mandatory, and of ammunition where feasible. The use of digital technology should be deployed during recordkeeping, where possible, to allow for weapons tracing from the time of retrieval and throughout the management chain, enhancing accountability. For further information, see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament. \nLink to wider SSR and arms control: Law enforcement agencies in conflict-affected countries often lack the capacity to investigate and prosecute weapons trafficking offenders and to collect and secure illegal weapons and ammunition. DDR practitioners should therefore align their efforts with broader arms control initiatives to ensure that weapons and ammunition management capacity deficits do not further contribute to illicit flows and the perpetration of armed violence. Understanding arms trafficking dynamics, achieved by ensuring collected weapons are marked and thus traceable, is critical to countering illicit arms flows. In the absence of this understanding, illicit flows may continue to provide arms to conflict parties and may continue to provide traffickers with incentives to fuel armed conflicts in order to create or expand their illicit arms market. For further information, see IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammunition Management and IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -226405,7 +226405,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3429, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the considerations laid out in IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, DDR practitioners should consider the following key factors when developing disarmament operations as part of DDR programmes in contexts of organized crime: \\nTransparency mechanisms: Specifically, the collection and destruction of weapons, ammunition and explosives should have accounting and monitoring measures in place to prevent diversion. This includes recordkeeping of weapons, ammunition and explosives collected during the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Transparency in the disposal of weapons and ammunition collected from former conflict parties is key to building trust in the DDR programme. Destruction should not take place if there is a risk that judicial evidence may be lost as a result of the disposal, and especially where there is a risk of linkages to organized crime activities. Recordkeeping and tracing of weapons should be mandatory, and of ammunition where feasible. The use of digital technology should be deployed during recordkeeping, where possible, to allow for weapons tracing from the time of retrieval and throughout the management chain, enhancing accountability. For further information, see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament. \\nLink to wider SSR and arms control: Law enforcement agencies in conflict-affected countries often lack the capacity to investigate and prosecute weapons trafficking offenders and to collect and secure illegal weapons and ammunition. DDR practitioners should therefore align their efforts with broader arms control initiatives to ensure that weapons and ammunition management capacity deficits do not further contribute to illicit flows and the perpetration of armed violence. Understanding arms trafficking dynamics, achieved by ensuring collected weapons are marked and thus traceable, is critical to countering illicit arms flows. In the absence of this understanding, illicit flows may continue to provide arms to conflict parties and may continue to provide traffickers with incentives to fuel armed conflicts in order to create or expand their illicit arms market. For further information, see IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammunition Management and IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the considerations laid out in IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, DDR practitioners should consider the following key factors when developing disarmament operations as part of DDR programmes in contexts of organized crime: \nTransparency mechanisms: Specifically, the collection and destruction of weapons, ammunition and explosives should have accounting and monitoring measures in place to prevent diversion. This includes recordkeeping of weapons, ammunition and explosives collected during the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Transparency in the disposal of weapons and ammunition collected from former conflict parties is key to building trust in the DDR programme. Destruction should not take place if there is a risk that judicial evidence may be lost as a result of the disposal, and especially where there is a risk of linkages to organized crime activities. Recordkeeping and tracing of weapons should be mandatory, and of ammunition where feasible. The use of digital technology should be deployed during recordkeeping, where possible, to allow for weapons tracing from the time of retrieval and throughout the management chain, enhancing accountability. For further information, see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament. \nLink to wider SSR and arms control: Law enforcement agencies in conflict-affected countries often lack the capacity to investigate and prosecute weapons trafficking offenders and to collect and secure illegal weapons and ammunition. DDR practitioners should therefore align their efforts with broader arms control initiatives to ensure that weapons and ammunition management capacity deficits do not further contribute to illicit flows and the perpetration of armed violence. Understanding arms trafficking dynamics, achieved by ensuring collected weapons are marked and thus traceable, is critical to countering illicit arms flows. In the absence of this understanding, illicit flows may continue to provide arms to conflict parties and may continue to provide traffickers with incentives to fuel armed conflicts in order to create or expand their illicit arms market. For further information, see IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammunition Management and IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -226423,7 +226423,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3429, - "Paragraph": "In addition to the considerations laid out in IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, DDR practitioners should consider the following key factors when developing disarmament operations as part of DDR programmes in contexts of organized crime: \\nTransparency mechanisms: Specifically, the collection and destruction of weapons, ammunition and explosives should have accounting and monitoring measures in place to prevent diversion. This includes recordkeeping of weapons, ammunition and explosives collected during the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Transparency in the disposal of weapons and ammunition collected from former conflict parties is key to building trust in the DDR programme. Destruction should not take place if there is a risk that judicial evidence may be lost as a result of the disposal, and especially where there is a risk of linkages to organized crime activities. Recordkeeping and tracing of weapons should be mandatory, and of ammunition where feasible. The use of digital technology should be deployed during recordkeeping, where possible, to allow for weapons tracing from the time of retrieval and throughout the management chain, enhancing accountability. For further information, see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament. \\nLink to wider SSR and arms control: Law enforcement agencies in conflict-affected countries often lack the capacity to investigate and prosecute weapons trafficking offenders and to collect and secure illegal weapons and ammunition. DDR practitioners should therefore align their efforts with broader arms control initiatives to ensure that weapons and ammunition management capacity deficits do not further contribute to illicit flows and the perpetration of armed violence. Understanding arms trafficking dynamics, achieved by ensuring collected weapons are marked and thus traceable, is critical to countering illicit arms flows. In the absence of this understanding, illicit flows may continue to provide arms to conflict parties and may continue to provide traffickers with incentives to fuel armed conflicts in order to create or expand their illicit arms market. For further information, see IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammunition Management and IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform.", + "Paragraph": "In addition to the considerations laid out in IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament, DDR practitioners should consider the following key factors when developing disarmament operations as part of DDR programmes in contexts of organized crime: \nTransparency mechanisms: Specifically, the collection and destruction of weapons, ammunition and explosives should have accounting and monitoring measures in place to prevent diversion. This includes recordkeeping of weapons, ammunition and explosives collected during the disarmament phase of a DDR programme. Transparency in the disposal of weapons and ammunition collected from former conflict parties is key to building trust in the DDR programme. Destruction should not take place if there is a risk that judicial evidence may be lost as a result of the disposal, and especially where there is a risk of linkages to organized crime activities. Recordkeeping and tracing of weapons should be mandatory, and of ammunition where feasible. The use of digital technology should be deployed during recordkeeping, where possible, to allow for weapons tracing from the time of retrieval and throughout the management chain, enhancing accountability. For further information, see IDDRS 4.10 on Disarmament. \nLink to wider SSR and arms control: Law enforcement agencies in conflict-affected countries often lack the capacity to investigate and prosecute weapons trafficking offenders and to collect and secure illegal weapons and ammunition. DDR practitioners should therefore align their efforts with broader arms control initiatives to ensure that weapons and ammunition management capacity deficits do not further contribute to illicit flows and the perpetration of armed violence. Understanding arms trafficking dynamics, achieved by ensuring collected weapons are marked and thus traceable, is critical to countering illicit arms flows. In the absence of this understanding, illicit flows may continue to provide arms to conflict parties and may continue to provide traffickers with incentives to fuel armed conflicts in order to create or expand their illicit arms market. For further information, see IDDRS 4.11 on Transitional Weapons and Ammunition Management and IDDRS 6.10 on DDR and Security Sector Reform.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -226441,7 +226441,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3430, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: DISARMAMENT: KEY QUESTIONS \\n What are the roles of weapons and ammunition in the commission of crime, including organized crime? \\n What are the social perspectives of conflict actors and communities on weapons and ammunition? What steps can be taken to develop local norms against the illegal use of weapons and ammunition? \\n What are the sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes? \\n In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of illicit weapons and ammunition in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and criminal activities? \\n How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have previously engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or ammunition? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \\n To what extent would the removal of weapons and ammunition jeopardize security and economic opportunities for ex-combatants and communities? \\n When disarmament is not appropriate, can DDR-related tools, such as transitional weapons and ammunition management, be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the hand over of weapons and ammunition? \\n Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: DISARMAMENT: KEY QUESTIONS \n What are the roles of weapons and ammunition in the commission of crime, including organized crime? \n What are the social perspectives of conflict actors and communities on weapons and ammunition? What steps can be taken to develop local norms against the illegal use of weapons and ammunition? \n What are the sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes? \n In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of illicit weapons and ammunition in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and criminal activities? \n How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have previously engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or ammunition? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \n To what extent would the removal of weapons and ammunition jeopardize security and economic opportunities for ex-combatants and communities? \n When disarmament is not appropriate, can DDR-related tools, such as transitional weapons and ammunition management, be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the hand over of weapons and ammunition? \n Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -226452,14 +226452,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1 Disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "BOX 1: DISARMAMENT: KEY QUESTIONS \\n What are the roles of weapons and ammunition in the commission of crime, including organized crime?", + "Sentence": "BOX 1: DISARMAMENT: KEY QUESTIONS \n What are the roles of weapons and ammunition in the commission of crime, including organized crime?", "newParagraph": "box 1 disarmament key question n role weapon ammunition commission crime including organized crime n social perspective conflict actor community weapon ammunition step taken develop local norm illegal use weapon ammunition n source illicit weapon ammunition possible trafficking route n conflict setting step taken disrupt flow illicit weapon ammunition order reduce capacity individual group engage armed conflict criminal activity n ddr programme highlight constructive role woman may previously engaged illicit trafficking weapon andor ammunition precaution taken avoid reinforcing creating genderbased inequality n extent would removal weapon ammunition jeopardize security economic opportunity excombatants community n disarmament appropriate ddrrelated tool transitional weapon ammunition management implemented alternative stage demobilization reintegration offered prior disarmament gain trust contribute hand weapon ammunition n proposed disarmament operation sufficient resource safely store weapon ammunition prevent diversion armed group engaged criminal activity", "ProcessedSent": "box 1 disarmament key question n role weapon ammunition commission crime including organized crime", "SentID": 12580 }, { "ParagraphID": 3430, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: DISARMAMENT: KEY QUESTIONS \\n What are the roles of weapons and ammunition in the commission of crime, including organized crime? \\n What are the social perspectives of conflict actors and communities on weapons and ammunition? What steps can be taken to develop local norms against the illegal use of weapons and ammunition? \\n What are the sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes? \\n In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of illicit weapons and ammunition in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and criminal activities? \\n How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have previously engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or ammunition? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \\n To what extent would the removal of weapons and ammunition jeopardize security and economic opportunities for ex-combatants and communities? \\n When disarmament is not appropriate, can DDR-related tools, such as transitional weapons and ammunition management, be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the hand over of weapons and ammunition? \\n Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: DISARMAMENT: KEY QUESTIONS \n What are the roles of weapons and ammunition in the commission of crime, including organized crime? \n What are the social perspectives of conflict actors and communities on weapons and ammunition? What steps can be taken to develop local norms against the illegal use of weapons and ammunition? \n What are the sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes? \n In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of illicit weapons and ammunition in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and criminal activities? \n How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have previously engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or ammunition? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \n To what extent would the removal of weapons and ammunition jeopardize security and economic opportunities for ex-combatants and communities? \n When disarmament is not appropriate, can DDR-related tools, such as transitional weapons and ammunition management, be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the hand over of weapons and ammunition? \n Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -226470,14 +226470,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1 Disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are the social perspectives of conflict actors and communities on weapons and ammunition?", + "Sentence": "\n What are the social perspectives of conflict actors and communities on weapons and ammunition?", "newParagraph": "box 1 disarmament key question n role weapon ammunition commission crime including organized crime n social perspective conflict actor community weapon ammunition step taken develop local norm illegal use weapon ammunition n source illicit weapon ammunition possible trafficking route n conflict setting step taken disrupt flow illicit weapon ammunition order reduce capacity individual group engage armed conflict criminal activity n ddr programme highlight constructive role woman may previously engaged illicit trafficking weapon andor ammunition precaution taken avoid reinforcing creating genderbased inequality n extent would removal weapon ammunition jeopardize security economic opportunity excombatants community n disarmament appropriate ddrrelated tool transitional weapon ammunition management implemented alternative stage demobilization reintegration offered prior disarmament gain trust contribute hand weapon ammunition n proposed disarmament operation sufficient resource safely store weapon ammunition prevent diversion armed group engaged criminal activity", "ProcessedSent": "n social perspective conflict actor community weapon ammunition", "SentID": 12581 }, { "ParagraphID": 3430, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: DISARMAMENT: KEY QUESTIONS \\n What are the roles of weapons and ammunition in the commission of crime, including organized crime? \\n What are the social perspectives of conflict actors and communities on weapons and ammunition? What steps can be taken to develop local norms against the illegal use of weapons and ammunition? \\n What are the sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes? \\n In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of illicit weapons and ammunition in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and criminal activities? \\n How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have previously engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or ammunition? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \\n To what extent would the removal of weapons and ammunition jeopardize security and economic opportunities for ex-combatants and communities? \\n When disarmament is not appropriate, can DDR-related tools, such as transitional weapons and ammunition management, be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the hand over of weapons and ammunition? \\n Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: DISARMAMENT: KEY QUESTIONS \n What are the roles of weapons and ammunition in the commission of crime, including organized crime? \n What are the social perspectives of conflict actors and communities on weapons and ammunition? What steps can be taken to develop local norms against the illegal use of weapons and ammunition? \n What are the sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes? \n In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of illicit weapons and ammunition in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and criminal activities? \n How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have previously engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or ammunition? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \n To what extent would the removal of weapons and ammunition jeopardize security and economic opportunities for ex-combatants and communities? \n When disarmament is not appropriate, can DDR-related tools, such as transitional weapons and ammunition management, be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the hand over of weapons and ammunition? \n Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -226495,7 +226495,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3430, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: DISARMAMENT: KEY QUESTIONS \\n What are the roles of weapons and ammunition in the commission of crime, including organized crime? \\n What are the social perspectives of conflict actors and communities on weapons and ammunition? What steps can be taken to develop local norms against the illegal use of weapons and ammunition? \\n What are the sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes? \\n In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of illicit weapons and ammunition in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and criminal activities? \\n How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have previously engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or ammunition? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \\n To what extent would the removal of weapons and ammunition jeopardize security and economic opportunities for ex-combatants and communities? \\n When disarmament is not appropriate, can DDR-related tools, such as transitional weapons and ammunition management, be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the hand over of weapons and ammunition? \\n Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: DISARMAMENT: KEY QUESTIONS \n What are the roles of weapons and ammunition in the commission of crime, including organized crime? \n What are the social perspectives of conflict actors and communities on weapons and ammunition? What steps can be taken to develop local norms against the illegal use of weapons and ammunition? \n What are the sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes? \n In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of illicit weapons and ammunition in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and criminal activities? \n How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have previously engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or ammunition? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \n To what extent would the removal of weapons and ammunition jeopardize security and economic opportunities for ex-combatants and communities? \n When disarmament is not appropriate, can DDR-related tools, such as transitional weapons and ammunition management, be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the hand over of weapons and ammunition? \n Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -226506,14 +226506,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1 Disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What are the sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes?", + "Sentence": "\n What are the sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes?", "newParagraph": "box 1 disarmament key question n role weapon ammunition commission crime including organized crime n social perspective conflict actor community weapon ammunition step taken develop local norm illegal use weapon ammunition n source illicit weapon ammunition possible trafficking route n conflict setting step taken disrupt flow illicit weapon ammunition order reduce capacity individual group engage armed conflict criminal activity n ddr programme highlight constructive role woman may previously engaged illicit trafficking weapon andor ammunition precaution taken avoid reinforcing creating genderbased inequality n extent would removal weapon ammunition jeopardize security economic opportunity excombatants community n disarmament appropriate ddrrelated tool transitional weapon ammunition management implemented alternative stage demobilization reintegration offered prior disarmament gain trust contribute hand weapon ammunition n proposed disarmament operation sufficient resource safely store weapon ammunition prevent diversion armed group engaged criminal activity", "ProcessedSent": "n source illicit weapon ammunition possible trafficking route", "SentID": 12583 }, { "ParagraphID": 3430, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: DISARMAMENT: KEY QUESTIONS \\n What are the roles of weapons and ammunition in the commission of crime, including organized crime? \\n What are the social perspectives of conflict actors and communities on weapons and ammunition? What steps can be taken to develop local norms against the illegal use of weapons and ammunition? \\n What are the sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes? \\n In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of illicit weapons and ammunition in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and criminal activities? \\n How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have previously engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or ammunition? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \\n To what extent would the removal of weapons and ammunition jeopardize security and economic opportunities for ex-combatants and communities? \\n When disarmament is not appropriate, can DDR-related tools, such as transitional weapons and ammunition management, be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the hand over of weapons and ammunition? \\n Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: DISARMAMENT: KEY QUESTIONS \n What are the roles of weapons and ammunition in the commission of crime, including organized crime? \n What are the social perspectives of conflict actors and communities on weapons and ammunition? What steps can be taken to develop local norms against the illegal use of weapons and ammunition? \n What are the sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes? \n In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of illicit weapons and ammunition in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and criminal activities? \n How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have previously engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or ammunition? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \n To what extent would the removal of weapons and ammunition jeopardize security and economic opportunities for ex-combatants and communities? \n When disarmament is not appropriate, can DDR-related tools, such as transitional weapons and ammunition management, be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the hand over of weapons and ammunition? \n Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -226524,14 +226524,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1 Disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of illicit weapons and ammunition in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and criminal activities?", + "Sentence": "\n In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of illicit weapons and ammunition in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and criminal activities?", "newParagraph": "box 1 disarmament key question n role weapon ammunition commission crime including organized crime n social perspective conflict actor community weapon ammunition step taken develop local norm illegal use weapon ammunition n source illicit weapon ammunition possible trafficking route n conflict setting step taken disrupt flow illicit weapon ammunition order reduce capacity individual group engage armed conflict criminal activity n ddr programme highlight constructive role woman may previously engaged illicit trafficking weapon andor ammunition precaution taken avoid reinforcing creating genderbased inequality n extent would removal weapon ammunition jeopardize security economic opportunity excombatants community n disarmament appropriate ddrrelated tool transitional weapon ammunition management implemented alternative stage demobilization reintegration offered prior disarmament gain trust contribute hand weapon ammunition n proposed disarmament operation sufficient resource safely store weapon ammunition prevent diversion armed group engaged criminal activity", "ProcessedSent": "n conflict setting step taken disrupt flow illicit weapon ammunition order reduce capacity individual group engage armed conflict criminal activity", "SentID": 12584 }, { "ParagraphID": 3430, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: DISARMAMENT: KEY QUESTIONS \\n What are the roles of weapons and ammunition in the commission of crime, including organized crime? \\n What are the social perspectives of conflict actors and communities on weapons and ammunition? What steps can be taken to develop local norms against the illegal use of weapons and ammunition? \\n What are the sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes? \\n In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of illicit weapons and ammunition in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and criminal activities? \\n How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have previously engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or ammunition? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \\n To what extent would the removal of weapons and ammunition jeopardize security and economic opportunities for ex-combatants and communities? \\n When disarmament is not appropriate, can DDR-related tools, such as transitional weapons and ammunition management, be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the hand over of weapons and ammunition? \\n Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: DISARMAMENT: KEY QUESTIONS \n What are the roles of weapons and ammunition in the commission of crime, including organized crime? \n What are the social perspectives of conflict actors and communities on weapons and ammunition? What steps can be taken to develop local norms against the illegal use of weapons and ammunition? \n What are the sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes? \n In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of illicit weapons and ammunition in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and criminal activities? \n How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have previously engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or ammunition? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \n To what extent would the removal of weapons and ammunition jeopardize security and economic opportunities for ex-combatants and communities? \n When disarmament is not appropriate, can DDR-related tools, such as transitional weapons and ammunition management, be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the hand over of weapons and ammunition? \n Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -226542,14 +226542,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1 Disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have previously engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or ammunition?", + "Sentence": "\n How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have previously engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or ammunition?", "newParagraph": "box 1 disarmament key question n role weapon ammunition commission crime including organized crime n social perspective conflict actor community weapon ammunition step taken develop local norm illegal use weapon ammunition n source illicit weapon ammunition possible trafficking route n conflict setting step taken disrupt flow illicit weapon ammunition order reduce capacity individual group engage armed conflict criminal activity n ddr programme highlight constructive role woman may previously engaged illicit trafficking weapon andor ammunition precaution taken avoid reinforcing creating genderbased inequality n extent would removal weapon ammunition jeopardize security economic opportunity excombatants community n disarmament appropriate ddrrelated tool transitional weapon ammunition management implemented alternative stage demobilization reintegration offered prior disarmament gain trust contribute hand weapon ammunition n proposed disarmament operation sufficient resource safely store weapon ammunition prevent diversion armed group engaged criminal activity", "ProcessedSent": "n ddr programme highlight constructive role woman may previously engaged illicit trafficking weapon andor ammunition", "SentID": 12585 }, { "ParagraphID": 3430, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: DISARMAMENT: KEY QUESTIONS \\n What are the roles of weapons and ammunition in the commission of crime, including organized crime? \\n What are the social perspectives of conflict actors and communities on weapons and ammunition? What steps can be taken to develop local norms against the illegal use of weapons and ammunition? \\n What are the sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes? \\n In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of illicit weapons and ammunition in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and criminal activities? \\n How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have previously engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or ammunition? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \\n To what extent would the removal of weapons and ammunition jeopardize security and economic opportunities for ex-combatants and communities? \\n When disarmament is not appropriate, can DDR-related tools, such as transitional weapons and ammunition management, be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the hand over of weapons and ammunition? \\n Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: DISARMAMENT: KEY QUESTIONS \n What are the roles of weapons and ammunition in the commission of crime, including organized crime? \n What are the social perspectives of conflict actors and communities on weapons and ammunition? What steps can be taken to develop local norms against the illegal use of weapons and ammunition? \n What are the sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes? \n In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of illicit weapons and ammunition in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and criminal activities? \n How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have previously engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or ammunition? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \n To what extent would the removal of weapons and ammunition jeopardize security and economic opportunities for ex-combatants and communities? \n When disarmament is not appropriate, can DDR-related tools, such as transitional weapons and ammunition management, be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the hand over of weapons and ammunition? \n Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -226567,7 +226567,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3430, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: DISARMAMENT: KEY QUESTIONS \\n What are the roles of weapons and ammunition in the commission of crime, including organized crime? \\n What are the social perspectives of conflict actors and communities on weapons and ammunition? What steps can be taken to develop local norms against the illegal use of weapons and ammunition? \\n What are the sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes? \\n In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of illicit weapons and ammunition in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and criminal activities? \\n How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have previously engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or ammunition? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \\n To what extent would the removal of weapons and ammunition jeopardize security and economic opportunities for ex-combatants and communities? \\n When disarmament is not appropriate, can DDR-related tools, such as transitional weapons and ammunition management, be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the hand over of weapons and ammunition? \\n Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: DISARMAMENT: KEY QUESTIONS \n What are the roles of weapons and ammunition in the commission of crime, including organized crime? \n What are the social perspectives of conflict actors and communities on weapons and ammunition? What steps can be taken to develop local norms against the illegal use of weapons and ammunition? \n What are the sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes? \n In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of illicit weapons and ammunition in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and criminal activities? \n How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have previously engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or ammunition? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \n To what extent would the removal of weapons and ammunition jeopardize security and economic opportunities for ex-combatants and communities? \n When disarmament is not appropriate, can DDR-related tools, such as transitional weapons and ammunition management, be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the hand over of weapons and ammunition? \n Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -226578,14 +226578,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1 Disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n To what extent would the removal of weapons and ammunition jeopardize security and economic opportunities for ex-combatants and communities?", + "Sentence": "\n To what extent would the removal of weapons and ammunition jeopardize security and economic opportunities for ex-combatants and communities?", "newParagraph": "box 1 disarmament key question n role weapon ammunition commission crime including organized crime n social perspective conflict actor community weapon ammunition step taken develop local norm illegal use weapon ammunition n source illicit weapon ammunition possible trafficking route n conflict setting step taken disrupt flow illicit weapon ammunition order reduce capacity individual group engage armed conflict criminal activity n ddr programme highlight constructive role woman may previously engaged illicit trafficking weapon andor ammunition precaution taken avoid reinforcing creating genderbased inequality n extent would removal weapon ammunition jeopardize security economic opportunity excombatants community n disarmament appropriate ddrrelated tool transitional weapon ammunition management implemented alternative stage demobilization reintegration offered prior disarmament gain trust contribute hand weapon ammunition n proposed disarmament operation sufficient resource safely store weapon ammunition prevent diversion armed group engaged criminal activity", "ProcessedSent": "n extent would removal weapon ammunition jeopardize security economic opportunity excombatants community", "SentID": 12587 }, { "ParagraphID": 3430, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: DISARMAMENT: KEY QUESTIONS \\n What are the roles of weapons and ammunition in the commission of crime, including organized crime? \\n What are the social perspectives of conflict actors and communities on weapons and ammunition? What steps can be taken to develop local norms against the illegal use of weapons and ammunition? \\n What are the sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes? \\n In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of illicit weapons and ammunition in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and criminal activities? \\n How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have previously engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or ammunition? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \\n To what extent would the removal of weapons and ammunition jeopardize security and economic opportunities for ex-combatants and communities? \\n When disarmament is not appropriate, can DDR-related tools, such as transitional weapons and ammunition management, be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the hand over of weapons and ammunition? \\n Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: DISARMAMENT: KEY QUESTIONS \n What are the roles of weapons and ammunition in the commission of crime, including organized crime? \n What are the social perspectives of conflict actors and communities on weapons and ammunition? What steps can be taken to develop local norms against the illegal use of weapons and ammunition? \n What are the sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes? \n In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of illicit weapons and ammunition in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and criminal activities? \n How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have previously engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or ammunition? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \n To what extent would the removal of weapons and ammunition jeopardize security and economic opportunities for ex-combatants and communities? \n When disarmament is not appropriate, can DDR-related tools, such as transitional weapons and ammunition management, be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the hand over of weapons and ammunition? \n Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -226596,14 +226596,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.1 Disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n When disarmament is not appropriate, can DDR-related tools, such as transitional weapons and ammunition management, be implemented?", + "Sentence": "\n When disarmament is not appropriate, can DDR-related tools, such as transitional weapons and ammunition management, be implemented?", "newParagraph": "box 1 disarmament key question n role weapon ammunition commission crime including organized crime n social perspective conflict actor community weapon ammunition step taken develop local norm illegal use weapon ammunition n source illicit weapon ammunition possible trafficking route n conflict setting step taken disrupt flow illicit weapon ammunition order reduce capacity individual group engage armed conflict criminal activity n ddr programme highlight constructive role woman may previously engaged illicit trafficking weapon andor ammunition precaution taken avoid reinforcing creating genderbased inequality n extent would removal weapon ammunition jeopardize security economic opportunity excombatants community n disarmament appropriate ddrrelated tool transitional weapon ammunition management implemented alternative stage demobilization reintegration offered prior disarmament gain trust contribute hand weapon ammunition n proposed disarmament operation sufficient resource safely store weapon ammunition prevent diversion armed group engaged criminal activity", "ProcessedSent": "n disarmament appropriate ddrrelated tool transitional weapon ammunition management implemented", "SentID": 12588 }, { "ParagraphID": 3430, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: DISARMAMENT: KEY QUESTIONS \\n What are the roles of weapons and ammunition in the commission of crime, including organized crime? \\n What are the social perspectives of conflict actors and communities on weapons and ammunition? What steps can be taken to develop local norms against the illegal use of weapons and ammunition? \\n What are the sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes? \\n In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of illicit weapons and ammunition in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and criminal activities? \\n How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have previously engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or ammunition? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \\n To what extent would the removal of weapons and ammunition jeopardize security and economic opportunities for ex-combatants and communities? \\n When disarmament is not appropriate, can DDR-related tools, such as transitional weapons and ammunition management, be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the hand over of weapons and ammunition? \\n Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: DISARMAMENT: KEY QUESTIONS \n What are the roles of weapons and ammunition in the commission of crime, including organized crime? \n What are the social perspectives of conflict actors and communities on weapons and ammunition? What steps can be taken to develop local norms against the illegal use of weapons and ammunition? \n What are the sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes? \n In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of illicit weapons and ammunition in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and criminal activities? \n How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have previously engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or ammunition? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \n To what extent would the removal of weapons and ammunition jeopardize security and economic opportunities for ex-combatants and communities? \n When disarmament is not appropriate, can DDR-related tools, such as transitional weapons and ammunition management, be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the hand over of weapons and ammunition? \n Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -226621,7 +226621,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3430, - "Paragraph": "BOX 1: DISARMAMENT: KEY QUESTIONS \\n What are the roles of weapons and ammunition in the commission of crime, including organized crime? \\n What are the social perspectives of conflict actors and communities on weapons and ammunition? What steps can be taken to develop local norms against the illegal use of weapons and ammunition? \\n What are the sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes? \\n In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of illicit weapons and ammunition in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and criminal activities? \\n How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have previously engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or ammunition? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \\n To what extent would the removal of weapons and ammunition jeopardize security and economic opportunities for ex-combatants and communities? \\n When disarmament is not appropriate, can DDR-related tools, such as transitional weapons and ammunition management, be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the hand over of weapons and ammunition? \\n Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 1: DISARMAMENT: KEY QUESTIONS \n What are the roles of weapons and ammunition in the commission of crime, including organized crime? \n What are the social perspectives of conflict actors and communities on weapons and ammunition? What steps can be taken to develop local norms against the illegal use of weapons and ammunition? \n What are the sources of illicit weapons and ammunition and possible trafficking routes? \n In conflict settings, what steps can be taken to disrupt the flow of illicit weapons and ammunition in order to reduce the capacity of individuals and groups to engage in armed conflict and criminal activities? \n How can DDR programmes highlight the constructive roles of women who may have previously engaged in the illicit trafficking of weapons and\/or ammunition? What precautions can be taken to avoid reinforcing or creating gender-based inequalities? \n To what extent would the removal of weapons and ammunition jeopardize security and economic opportunities for ex-combatants and communities? \n When disarmament is not appropriate, can DDR-related tools, such as transitional weapons and ammunition management, be implemented? Can alternative stages (demobilization and reintegration) be offered prior to disarmament to gain trust and contribute to the hand over of weapons and ammunition? \n Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -226632,7 +226632,7 @@ "Heading2": "7.1 Disarmament", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities?", + "Sentence": "\n Does the proposed disarmament operation have sufficient resources to safely store weapons and ammunition and prevent diversion to armed groups engaged in criminal activities?", "newParagraph": "box 1 disarmament key question n role weapon ammunition commission crime including organized crime n social perspective conflict actor community weapon ammunition step taken develop local norm illegal use weapon ammunition n source illicit weapon ammunition possible trafficking route n conflict setting step taken disrupt flow illicit weapon ammunition order reduce capacity individual group engage armed conflict criminal activity n ddr programme highlight constructive role woman may previously engaged illicit trafficking weapon andor ammunition precaution taken avoid reinforcing creating genderbased inequality n extent would removal weapon ammunition jeopardize security economic opportunity excombatants community n disarmament appropriate ddrrelated tool transitional weapon ammunition management implemented alternative stage demobilization reintegration offered prior disarmament gain trust contribute hand weapon ammunition n proposed disarmament operation sufficient resource safely store weapon ammunition prevent diversion armed group engaged criminal activity", "ProcessedSent": "n proposed disarmament operation sufficient resource safely store weapon ammunition prevent diversion armed group engaged criminal activity", "SentID": 12590 @@ -226963,7 +226963,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3435, - "Paragraph": "BOX 2: DEMOBILIZATION: KEY QUESTIONS \\n What is the risk (if any) that reinsertion assistance will equip former members of armed forces and groups with skills that can be used in criminal activities? \\n If skills training and catch-up education are provided as part of short-term reinsertion assistance, do they adequately initiate former members of armed forces and groups into the realities of the lawful economic and social environment? \\n What safeguards can be put into place to prevent former members of armed forces and groups from being recruited by criminal actors? \\n What does demobilization offer that organized crime does not? Conversely, what does organized crime offer that demobilization does not? What are the (perceived) benefits of continued engagement in illicit activities? \\n How does demobilization address the specific needs of certain groups, such as women and children, who may have engaged in and\/or been victims of organized crime in conflict?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 2: DEMOBILIZATION: KEY QUESTIONS \n What is the risk (if any) that reinsertion assistance will equip former members of armed forces and groups with skills that can be used in criminal activities? \n If skills training and catch-up education are provided as part of short-term reinsertion assistance, do they adequately initiate former members of armed forces and groups into the realities of the lawful economic and social environment? \n What safeguards can be put into place to prevent former members of armed forces and groups from being recruited by criminal actors? \n What does demobilization offer that organized crime does not? Conversely, what does organized crime offer that demobilization does not? What are the (perceived) benefits of continued engagement in illicit activities? \n How does demobilization address the specific needs of certain groups, such as women and children, who may have engaged in and\/or been victims of organized crime in conflict?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -226974,14 +226974,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Demobilization", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "BOX 2: DEMOBILIZATION: KEY QUESTIONS \\n What is the risk (if any) that reinsertion assistance will equip former members of armed forces and groups with skills that can be used in criminal activities?", + "Sentence": "BOX 2: DEMOBILIZATION: KEY QUESTIONS \n What is the risk (if any) that reinsertion assistance will equip former members of armed forces and groups with skills that can be used in criminal activities?", "newParagraph": "box 2 demobilization key question n risk reinsertion assistance equip former member armed force group skill used criminal activity n skill training catchup education provided part shortterm reinsertion assistance adequately initiate former member armed force group reality lawful economic social environment n safeguard put place prevent former member armed force group recruited criminal actor n demobilization offer organized crime conversely organized crime offer demobilization perceived benefit continued engagement illicit activity n demobilization address specific need certain group woman child may engaged andor victim organized crime conflict", "ProcessedSent": "box 2 demobilization key question n risk reinsertion assistance equip former member armed force group skill used criminal activity", "SentID": 12609 }, { "ParagraphID": 3435, - "Paragraph": "BOX 2: DEMOBILIZATION: KEY QUESTIONS \\n What is the risk (if any) that reinsertion assistance will equip former members of armed forces and groups with skills that can be used in criminal activities? \\n If skills training and catch-up education are provided as part of short-term reinsertion assistance, do they adequately initiate former members of armed forces and groups into the realities of the lawful economic and social environment? \\n What safeguards can be put into place to prevent former members of armed forces and groups from being recruited by criminal actors? \\n What does demobilization offer that organized crime does not? Conversely, what does organized crime offer that demobilization does not? What are the (perceived) benefits of continued engagement in illicit activities? \\n How does demobilization address the specific needs of certain groups, such as women and children, who may have engaged in and\/or been victims of organized crime in conflict?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 2: DEMOBILIZATION: KEY QUESTIONS \n What is the risk (if any) that reinsertion assistance will equip former members of armed forces and groups with skills that can be used in criminal activities? \n If skills training and catch-up education are provided as part of short-term reinsertion assistance, do they adequately initiate former members of armed forces and groups into the realities of the lawful economic and social environment? \n What safeguards can be put into place to prevent former members of armed forces and groups from being recruited by criminal actors? \n What does demobilization offer that organized crime does not? Conversely, what does organized crime offer that demobilization does not? What are the (perceived) benefits of continued engagement in illicit activities? \n How does demobilization address the specific needs of certain groups, such as women and children, who may have engaged in and\/or been victims of organized crime in conflict?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -226992,14 +226992,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Demobilization", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n If skills training and catch-up education are provided as part of short-term reinsertion assistance, do they adequately initiate former members of armed forces and groups into the realities of the lawful economic and social environment?", + "Sentence": "\n If skills training and catch-up education are provided as part of short-term reinsertion assistance, do they adequately initiate former members of armed forces and groups into the realities of the lawful economic and social environment?", "newParagraph": "box 2 demobilization key question n risk reinsertion assistance equip former member armed force group skill used criminal activity n skill training catchup education provided part shortterm reinsertion assistance adequately initiate former member armed force group reality lawful economic social environment n safeguard put place prevent former member armed force group recruited criminal actor n demobilization offer organized crime conversely organized crime offer demobilization perceived benefit continued engagement illicit activity n demobilization address specific need certain group woman child may engaged andor victim organized crime conflict", "ProcessedSent": "n skill training catchup education provided part shortterm reinsertion assistance adequately initiate former member armed force group reality lawful economic social environment", "SentID": 12610 }, { "ParagraphID": 3435, - "Paragraph": "BOX 2: DEMOBILIZATION: KEY QUESTIONS \\n What is the risk (if any) that reinsertion assistance will equip former members of armed forces and groups with skills that can be used in criminal activities? \\n If skills training and catch-up education are provided as part of short-term reinsertion assistance, do they adequately initiate former members of armed forces and groups into the realities of the lawful economic and social environment? \\n What safeguards can be put into place to prevent former members of armed forces and groups from being recruited by criminal actors? \\n What does demobilization offer that organized crime does not? Conversely, what does organized crime offer that demobilization does not? What are the (perceived) benefits of continued engagement in illicit activities? \\n How does demobilization address the specific needs of certain groups, such as women and children, who may have engaged in and\/or been victims of organized crime in conflict?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 2: DEMOBILIZATION: KEY QUESTIONS \n What is the risk (if any) that reinsertion assistance will equip former members of armed forces and groups with skills that can be used in criminal activities? \n If skills training and catch-up education are provided as part of short-term reinsertion assistance, do they adequately initiate former members of armed forces and groups into the realities of the lawful economic and social environment? \n What safeguards can be put into place to prevent former members of armed forces and groups from being recruited by criminal actors? \n What does demobilization offer that organized crime does not? Conversely, what does organized crime offer that demobilization does not? What are the (perceived) benefits of continued engagement in illicit activities? \n How does demobilization address the specific needs of certain groups, such as women and children, who may have engaged in and\/or been victims of organized crime in conflict?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -227010,14 +227010,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Demobilization", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What safeguards can be put into place to prevent former members of armed forces and groups from being recruited by criminal actors?", + "Sentence": "\n What safeguards can be put into place to prevent former members of armed forces and groups from being recruited by criminal actors?", "newParagraph": "box 2 demobilization key question n risk reinsertion assistance equip former member armed force group skill used criminal activity n skill training catchup education provided part shortterm reinsertion assistance adequately initiate former member armed force group reality lawful economic social environment n safeguard put place prevent former member armed force group recruited criminal actor n demobilization offer organized crime conversely organized crime offer demobilization perceived benefit continued engagement illicit activity n demobilization address specific need certain group woman child may engaged andor victim organized crime conflict", "ProcessedSent": "n safeguard put place prevent former member armed force group recruited criminal actor", "SentID": 12611 }, { "ParagraphID": 3435, - "Paragraph": "BOX 2: DEMOBILIZATION: KEY QUESTIONS \\n What is the risk (if any) that reinsertion assistance will equip former members of armed forces and groups with skills that can be used in criminal activities? \\n If skills training and catch-up education are provided as part of short-term reinsertion assistance, do they adequately initiate former members of armed forces and groups into the realities of the lawful economic and social environment? \\n What safeguards can be put into place to prevent former members of armed forces and groups from being recruited by criminal actors? \\n What does demobilization offer that organized crime does not? Conversely, what does organized crime offer that demobilization does not? What are the (perceived) benefits of continued engagement in illicit activities? \\n How does demobilization address the specific needs of certain groups, such as women and children, who may have engaged in and\/or been victims of organized crime in conflict?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 2: DEMOBILIZATION: KEY QUESTIONS \n What is the risk (if any) that reinsertion assistance will equip former members of armed forces and groups with skills that can be used in criminal activities? \n If skills training and catch-up education are provided as part of short-term reinsertion assistance, do they adequately initiate former members of armed forces and groups into the realities of the lawful economic and social environment? \n What safeguards can be put into place to prevent former members of armed forces and groups from being recruited by criminal actors? \n What does demobilization offer that organized crime does not? Conversely, what does organized crime offer that demobilization does not? What are the (perceived) benefits of continued engagement in illicit activities? \n How does demobilization address the specific needs of certain groups, such as women and children, who may have engaged in and\/or been victims of organized crime in conflict?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -227028,14 +227028,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Demobilization", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What does demobilization offer that organized crime does not?", + "Sentence": "\n What does demobilization offer that organized crime does not?", "newParagraph": "box 2 demobilization key question n risk reinsertion assistance equip former member armed force group skill used criminal activity n skill training catchup education provided part shortterm reinsertion assistance adequately initiate former member armed force group reality lawful economic social environment n safeguard put place prevent former member armed force group recruited criminal actor n demobilization offer organized crime conversely organized crime offer demobilization perceived benefit continued engagement illicit activity n demobilization address specific need certain group woman child may engaged andor victim organized crime conflict", "ProcessedSent": "n demobilization offer organized crime", "SentID": 12612 }, { "ParagraphID": 3435, - "Paragraph": "BOX 2: DEMOBILIZATION: KEY QUESTIONS \\n What is the risk (if any) that reinsertion assistance will equip former members of armed forces and groups with skills that can be used in criminal activities? \\n If skills training and catch-up education are provided as part of short-term reinsertion assistance, do they adequately initiate former members of armed forces and groups into the realities of the lawful economic and social environment? \\n What safeguards can be put into place to prevent former members of armed forces and groups from being recruited by criminal actors? \\n What does demobilization offer that organized crime does not? Conversely, what does organized crime offer that demobilization does not? What are the (perceived) benefits of continued engagement in illicit activities? \\n How does demobilization address the specific needs of certain groups, such as women and children, who may have engaged in and\/or been victims of organized crime in conflict?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 2: DEMOBILIZATION: KEY QUESTIONS \n What is the risk (if any) that reinsertion assistance will equip former members of armed forces and groups with skills that can be used in criminal activities? \n If skills training and catch-up education are provided as part of short-term reinsertion assistance, do they adequately initiate former members of armed forces and groups into the realities of the lawful economic and social environment? \n What safeguards can be put into place to prevent former members of armed forces and groups from being recruited by criminal actors? \n What does demobilization offer that organized crime does not? Conversely, what does organized crime offer that demobilization does not? What are the (perceived) benefits of continued engagement in illicit activities? \n How does demobilization address the specific needs of certain groups, such as women and children, who may have engaged in and\/or been victims of organized crime in conflict?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -227053,7 +227053,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3435, - "Paragraph": "BOX 2: DEMOBILIZATION: KEY QUESTIONS \\n What is the risk (if any) that reinsertion assistance will equip former members of armed forces and groups with skills that can be used in criminal activities? \\n If skills training and catch-up education are provided as part of short-term reinsertion assistance, do they adequately initiate former members of armed forces and groups into the realities of the lawful economic and social environment? \\n What safeguards can be put into place to prevent former members of armed forces and groups from being recruited by criminal actors? \\n What does demobilization offer that organized crime does not? Conversely, what does organized crime offer that demobilization does not? What are the (perceived) benefits of continued engagement in illicit activities? \\n How does demobilization address the specific needs of certain groups, such as women and children, who may have engaged in and\/or been victims of organized crime in conflict?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 2: DEMOBILIZATION: KEY QUESTIONS \n What is the risk (if any) that reinsertion assistance will equip former members of armed forces and groups with skills that can be used in criminal activities? \n If skills training and catch-up education are provided as part of short-term reinsertion assistance, do they adequately initiate former members of armed forces and groups into the realities of the lawful economic and social environment? \n What safeguards can be put into place to prevent former members of armed forces and groups from being recruited by criminal actors? \n What does demobilization offer that organized crime does not? Conversely, what does organized crime offer that demobilization does not? What are the (perceived) benefits of continued engagement in illicit activities? \n How does demobilization address the specific needs of certain groups, such as women and children, who may have engaged in and\/or been victims of organized crime in conflict?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -227071,7 +227071,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3435, - "Paragraph": "BOX 2: DEMOBILIZATION: KEY QUESTIONS \\n What is the risk (if any) that reinsertion assistance will equip former members of armed forces and groups with skills that can be used in criminal activities? \\n If skills training and catch-up education are provided as part of short-term reinsertion assistance, do they adequately initiate former members of armed forces and groups into the realities of the lawful economic and social environment? \\n What safeguards can be put into place to prevent former members of armed forces and groups from being recruited by criminal actors? \\n What does demobilization offer that organized crime does not? Conversely, what does organized crime offer that demobilization does not? What are the (perceived) benefits of continued engagement in illicit activities? \\n How does demobilization address the specific needs of certain groups, such as women and children, who may have engaged in and\/or been victims of organized crime in conflict?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 2: DEMOBILIZATION: KEY QUESTIONS \n What is the risk (if any) that reinsertion assistance will equip former members of armed forces and groups with skills that can be used in criminal activities? \n If skills training and catch-up education are provided as part of short-term reinsertion assistance, do they adequately initiate former members of armed forces and groups into the realities of the lawful economic and social environment? \n What safeguards can be put into place to prevent former members of armed forces and groups from being recruited by criminal actors? \n What does demobilization offer that organized crime does not? Conversely, what does organized crime offer that demobilization does not? What are the (perceived) benefits of continued engagement in illicit activities? \n How does demobilization address the specific needs of certain groups, such as women and children, who may have engaged in and\/or been victims of organized crime in conflict?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -227082,7 +227082,7 @@ "Heading2": "7.2 Demobilization", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n How does demobilization address the specific needs of certain groups, such as women and children, who may have engaged in and\/or been victims of organized crime in conflict?", + "Sentence": "\n How does demobilization address the specific needs of certain groups, such as women and children, who may have engaged in and\/or been victims of organized crime in conflict?", "newParagraph": "box 2 demobilization key question n risk reinsertion assistance equip former member armed force group skill used criminal activity n skill training catchup education provided part shortterm reinsertion assistance adequately initiate former member armed force group reality lawful economic social environment n safeguard put place prevent former member armed force group recruited criminal actor n demobilization offer organized crime conversely organized crime offer demobilization perceived benefit continued engagement illicit activity n demobilization address specific need certain group woman child may engaged andor victim organized crime conflict", "ProcessedSent": "n demobilization address specific need certain group woman child may engaged andor victim organized crime conflict", "SentID": 12615 @@ -227359,7 +227359,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3441, - "Paragraph": "BOX 3: REINTEGRATION: KEY QUESTIONS \\n What are the risks and benefits involved in disrupting the illicit economies upon which communities depend? \\n How can support be distributed between former members of armed forces and groups, communities and victims in ways that are fair, facilitate reintegration, and avoid re-recruitment by organized criminal actors? \\n What steps can be taken when the reintegration support offered cannot outweigh the benefits offered through illicit activities? \\n What community-based monitoring initiatives can be put in place to ensure the sustained reintegration of former members of armed forces and groups and their continued non-involvement in criminal activities? \\n How can reintegration efforts work to address the motives and incentives of conflict actors through non-violent means, and what are the associated risks? \\n Which actors should contribute to addressing the conflict-crime nexus during reintegration, and in which capacity (including, among others, international agencies, public institutions, civil society and the private sector)?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 3: REINTEGRATION: KEY QUESTIONS \n What are the risks and benefits involved in disrupting the illicit economies upon which communities depend? \n How can support be distributed between former members of armed forces and groups, communities and victims in ways that are fair, facilitate reintegration, and avoid re-recruitment by organized criminal actors? \n What steps can be taken when the reintegration support offered cannot outweigh the benefits offered through illicit activities? \n What community-based monitoring initiatives can be put in place to ensure the sustained reintegration of former members of armed forces and groups and their continued non-involvement in criminal activities? \n How can reintegration efforts work to address the motives and incentives of conflict actors through non-violent means, and what are the associated risks? \n Which actors should contribute to addressing the conflict-crime nexus during reintegration, and in which capacity (including, among others, international agencies, public institutions, civil society and the private sector)?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -227370,14 +227370,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3 Reintegration", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "BOX 3: REINTEGRATION: KEY QUESTIONS \\n What are the risks and benefits involved in disrupting the illicit economies upon which communities depend?", + "Sentence": "BOX 3: REINTEGRATION: KEY QUESTIONS \n What are the risks and benefits involved in disrupting the illicit economies upon which communities depend?", "newParagraph": "box 3 reintegration key question n risk benefit involved disrupting illicit economy upon community depend n support distributed former member armed force group community victim way fair facilitate reintegration avoid rerecruitment organized criminal actor n step taken reintegration support offered cannot outweigh benefit offered illicit activity n communitybased monitoring initiative put place ensure sustained reintegration former member armed force group continued noninvolvement criminal activity n reintegration effort work address motif incentive conflict actor nonviolent mean associated risk n actor contribute addressing conflictcrime nexus reintegration capacity including among others international agency public institution civil society private sector", "ProcessedSent": "box 3 reintegration key question n risk benefit involved disrupting illicit economy upon community depend", "SentID": 12631 }, { "ParagraphID": 3441, - "Paragraph": "BOX 3: REINTEGRATION: KEY QUESTIONS \\n What are the risks and benefits involved in disrupting the illicit economies upon which communities depend? \\n How can support be distributed between former members of armed forces and groups, communities and victims in ways that are fair, facilitate reintegration, and avoid re-recruitment by organized criminal actors? \\n What steps can be taken when the reintegration support offered cannot outweigh the benefits offered through illicit activities? \\n What community-based monitoring initiatives can be put in place to ensure the sustained reintegration of former members of armed forces and groups and their continued non-involvement in criminal activities? \\n How can reintegration efforts work to address the motives and incentives of conflict actors through non-violent means, and what are the associated risks? \\n Which actors should contribute to addressing the conflict-crime nexus during reintegration, and in which capacity (including, among others, international agencies, public institutions, civil society and the private sector)?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 3: REINTEGRATION: KEY QUESTIONS \n What are the risks and benefits involved in disrupting the illicit economies upon which communities depend? \n How can support be distributed between former members of armed forces and groups, communities and victims in ways that are fair, facilitate reintegration, and avoid re-recruitment by organized criminal actors? \n What steps can be taken when the reintegration support offered cannot outweigh the benefits offered through illicit activities? \n What community-based monitoring initiatives can be put in place to ensure the sustained reintegration of former members of armed forces and groups and their continued non-involvement in criminal activities? \n How can reintegration efforts work to address the motives and incentives of conflict actors through non-violent means, and what are the associated risks? \n Which actors should contribute to addressing the conflict-crime nexus during reintegration, and in which capacity (including, among others, international agencies, public institutions, civil society and the private sector)?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -227388,14 +227388,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3 Reintegration", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n How can support be distributed between former members of armed forces and groups, communities and victims in ways that are fair, facilitate reintegration, and avoid re-recruitment by organized criminal actors?", + "Sentence": "\n How can support be distributed between former members of armed forces and groups, communities and victims in ways that are fair, facilitate reintegration, and avoid re-recruitment by organized criminal actors?", "newParagraph": "box 3 reintegration key question n risk benefit involved disrupting illicit economy upon community depend n support distributed former member armed force group community victim way fair facilitate reintegration avoid rerecruitment organized criminal actor n step taken reintegration support offered cannot outweigh benefit offered illicit activity n communitybased monitoring initiative put place ensure sustained reintegration former member armed force group continued noninvolvement criminal activity n reintegration effort work address motif incentive conflict actor nonviolent mean associated risk n actor contribute addressing conflictcrime nexus reintegration capacity including among others international agency public institution civil society private sector", "ProcessedSent": "n support distributed former member armed force group community victim way fair facilitate reintegration avoid rerecruitment organized criminal actor", "SentID": 12632 }, { "ParagraphID": 3441, - "Paragraph": "BOX 3: REINTEGRATION: KEY QUESTIONS \\n What are the risks and benefits involved in disrupting the illicit economies upon which communities depend? \\n How can support be distributed between former members of armed forces and groups, communities and victims in ways that are fair, facilitate reintegration, and avoid re-recruitment by organized criminal actors? \\n What steps can be taken when the reintegration support offered cannot outweigh the benefits offered through illicit activities? \\n What community-based monitoring initiatives can be put in place to ensure the sustained reintegration of former members of armed forces and groups and their continued non-involvement in criminal activities? \\n How can reintegration efforts work to address the motives and incentives of conflict actors through non-violent means, and what are the associated risks? \\n Which actors should contribute to addressing the conflict-crime nexus during reintegration, and in which capacity (including, among others, international agencies, public institutions, civil society and the private sector)?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 3: REINTEGRATION: KEY QUESTIONS \n What are the risks and benefits involved in disrupting the illicit economies upon which communities depend? \n How can support be distributed between former members of armed forces and groups, communities and victims in ways that are fair, facilitate reintegration, and avoid re-recruitment by organized criminal actors? \n What steps can be taken when the reintegration support offered cannot outweigh the benefits offered through illicit activities? \n What community-based monitoring initiatives can be put in place to ensure the sustained reintegration of former members of armed forces and groups and their continued non-involvement in criminal activities? \n How can reintegration efforts work to address the motives and incentives of conflict actors through non-violent means, and what are the associated risks? \n Which actors should contribute to addressing the conflict-crime nexus during reintegration, and in which capacity (including, among others, international agencies, public institutions, civil society and the private sector)?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -227406,14 +227406,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3 Reintegration", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What steps can be taken when the reintegration support offered cannot outweigh the benefits offered through illicit activities?", + "Sentence": "\n What steps can be taken when the reintegration support offered cannot outweigh the benefits offered through illicit activities?", "newParagraph": "box 3 reintegration key question n risk benefit involved disrupting illicit economy upon community depend n support distributed former member armed force group community victim way fair facilitate reintegration avoid rerecruitment organized criminal actor n step taken reintegration support offered cannot outweigh benefit offered illicit activity n communitybased monitoring initiative put place ensure sustained reintegration former member armed force group continued noninvolvement criminal activity n reintegration effort work address motif incentive conflict actor nonviolent mean associated risk n actor contribute addressing conflictcrime nexus reintegration capacity including among others international agency public institution civil society private sector", "ProcessedSent": "n step taken reintegration support offered cannot outweigh benefit offered illicit activity", "SentID": 12633 }, { "ParagraphID": 3441, - "Paragraph": "BOX 3: REINTEGRATION: KEY QUESTIONS \\n What are the risks and benefits involved in disrupting the illicit economies upon which communities depend? \\n How can support be distributed between former members of armed forces and groups, communities and victims in ways that are fair, facilitate reintegration, and avoid re-recruitment by organized criminal actors? \\n What steps can be taken when the reintegration support offered cannot outweigh the benefits offered through illicit activities? \\n What community-based monitoring initiatives can be put in place to ensure the sustained reintegration of former members of armed forces and groups and their continued non-involvement in criminal activities? \\n How can reintegration efforts work to address the motives and incentives of conflict actors through non-violent means, and what are the associated risks? \\n Which actors should contribute to addressing the conflict-crime nexus during reintegration, and in which capacity (including, among others, international agencies, public institutions, civil society and the private sector)?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 3: REINTEGRATION: KEY QUESTIONS \n What are the risks and benefits involved in disrupting the illicit economies upon which communities depend? \n How can support be distributed between former members of armed forces and groups, communities and victims in ways that are fair, facilitate reintegration, and avoid re-recruitment by organized criminal actors? \n What steps can be taken when the reintegration support offered cannot outweigh the benefits offered through illicit activities? \n What community-based monitoring initiatives can be put in place to ensure the sustained reintegration of former members of armed forces and groups and their continued non-involvement in criminal activities? \n How can reintegration efforts work to address the motives and incentives of conflict actors through non-violent means, and what are the associated risks? \n Which actors should contribute to addressing the conflict-crime nexus during reintegration, and in which capacity (including, among others, international agencies, public institutions, civil society and the private sector)?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -227424,14 +227424,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3 Reintegration", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n What community-based monitoring initiatives can be put in place to ensure the sustained reintegration of former members of armed forces and groups and their continued non-involvement in criminal activities?", + "Sentence": "\n What community-based monitoring initiatives can be put in place to ensure the sustained reintegration of former members of armed forces and groups and their continued non-involvement in criminal activities?", "newParagraph": "box 3 reintegration key question n risk benefit involved disrupting illicit economy upon community depend n support distributed former member armed force group community victim way fair facilitate reintegration avoid rerecruitment organized criminal actor n step taken reintegration support offered cannot outweigh benefit offered illicit activity n communitybased monitoring initiative put place ensure sustained reintegration former member armed force group continued noninvolvement criminal activity n reintegration effort work address motif incentive conflict actor nonviolent mean associated risk n actor contribute addressing conflictcrime nexus reintegration capacity including among others international agency public institution civil society private sector", "ProcessedSent": "n communitybased monitoring initiative put place ensure sustained reintegration former member armed force group continued noninvolvement criminal activity", "SentID": 12634 }, { "ParagraphID": 3441, - "Paragraph": "BOX 3: REINTEGRATION: KEY QUESTIONS \\n What are the risks and benefits involved in disrupting the illicit economies upon which communities depend? \\n How can support be distributed between former members of armed forces and groups, communities and victims in ways that are fair, facilitate reintegration, and avoid re-recruitment by organized criminal actors? \\n What steps can be taken when the reintegration support offered cannot outweigh the benefits offered through illicit activities? \\n What community-based monitoring initiatives can be put in place to ensure the sustained reintegration of former members of armed forces and groups and their continued non-involvement in criminal activities? \\n How can reintegration efforts work to address the motives and incentives of conflict actors through non-violent means, and what are the associated risks? \\n Which actors should contribute to addressing the conflict-crime nexus during reintegration, and in which capacity (including, among others, international agencies, public institutions, civil society and the private sector)?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 3: REINTEGRATION: KEY QUESTIONS \n What are the risks and benefits involved in disrupting the illicit economies upon which communities depend? \n How can support be distributed between former members of armed forces and groups, communities and victims in ways that are fair, facilitate reintegration, and avoid re-recruitment by organized criminal actors? \n What steps can be taken when the reintegration support offered cannot outweigh the benefits offered through illicit activities? \n What community-based monitoring initiatives can be put in place to ensure the sustained reintegration of former members of armed forces and groups and their continued non-involvement in criminal activities? \n How can reintegration efforts work to address the motives and incentives of conflict actors through non-violent means, and what are the associated risks? \n Which actors should contribute to addressing the conflict-crime nexus during reintegration, and in which capacity (including, among others, international agencies, public institutions, civil society and the private sector)?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -227442,14 +227442,14 @@ "Heading2": "7.3 Reintegration", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n How can reintegration efforts work to address the motives and incentives of conflict actors through non-violent means, and what are the associated risks?", + "Sentence": "\n How can reintegration efforts work to address the motives and incentives of conflict actors through non-violent means, and what are the associated risks?", "newParagraph": "box 3 reintegration key question n risk benefit involved disrupting illicit economy upon community depend n support distributed former member armed force group community victim way fair facilitate reintegration avoid rerecruitment organized criminal actor n step taken reintegration support offered cannot outweigh benefit offered illicit activity n communitybased monitoring initiative put place ensure sustained reintegration former member armed force group continued noninvolvement criminal activity n reintegration effort work address motif incentive conflict actor nonviolent mean associated risk n actor contribute addressing conflictcrime nexus reintegration capacity including among others international agency public institution civil society private sector", "ProcessedSent": "n reintegration effort work address motif incentive conflict actor nonviolent mean associated risk", "SentID": 12635 }, { "ParagraphID": 3441, - "Paragraph": "BOX 3: REINTEGRATION: KEY QUESTIONS \\n What are the risks and benefits involved in disrupting the illicit economies upon which communities depend? \\n How can support be distributed between former members of armed forces and groups, communities and victims in ways that are fair, facilitate reintegration, and avoid re-recruitment by organized criminal actors? \\n What steps can be taken when the reintegration support offered cannot outweigh the benefits offered through illicit activities? \\n What community-based monitoring initiatives can be put in place to ensure the sustained reintegration of former members of armed forces and groups and their continued non-involvement in criminal activities? \\n How can reintegration efforts work to address the motives and incentives of conflict actors through non-violent means, and what are the associated risks? \\n Which actors should contribute to addressing the conflict-crime nexus during reintegration, and in which capacity (including, among others, international agencies, public institutions, civil society and the private sector)?", + "Paragraph": "BOX 3: REINTEGRATION: KEY QUESTIONS \n What are the risks and benefits involved in disrupting the illicit economies upon which communities depend? \n How can support be distributed between former members of armed forces and groups, communities and victims in ways that are fair, facilitate reintegration, and avoid re-recruitment by organized criminal actors? \n What steps can be taken when the reintegration support offered cannot outweigh the benefits offered through illicit activities? \n What community-based monitoring initiatives can be put in place to ensure the sustained reintegration of former members of armed forces and groups and their continued non-involvement in criminal activities? \n How can reintegration efforts work to address the motives and incentives of conflict actors through non-violent means, and what are the associated risks? \n Which actors should contribute to addressing the conflict-crime nexus during reintegration, and in which capacity (including, among others, international agencies, public institutions, civil society and the private sector)?", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -227460,7 +227460,7 @@ "Heading2": "7.3 Reintegration", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n Which actors should contribute to addressing the conflict-crime nexus during reintegration, and in which capacity (including, among others, international agencies, public institutions, civil society and the private sector)?", + "Sentence": "\n Which actors should contribute to addressing the conflict-crime nexus during reintegration, and in which capacity (including, among others, international agencies, public institutions, civil society and the private sector)?", "newParagraph": "box 3 reintegration key question n risk benefit involved disrupting illicit economy upon community depend n support distributed former member armed force group community victim way fair facilitate reintegration avoid rerecruitment organized criminal actor n step taken reintegration support offered cannot outweigh benefit offered illicit activity n communitybased monitoring initiative put place ensure sustained reintegration former member armed force group continued noninvolvement criminal activity n reintegration effort work address motif incentive conflict actor nonviolent mean associated risk n actor contribute addressing conflictcrime nexus reintegration capacity including among others international agency public institution civil society private sector", "ProcessedSent": "n actor contribute addressing conflictcrime nexus reintegration capacity including among others international agency public institution civil society private sector", "SentID": 12636 @@ -229699,7 +229699,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3475, - "Paragraph": "United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2000) \\n The UNTOC is the main international instrument in the fight against transnational organized crime. States that ratify this instrument commit themselves to taking a series of measures against transnational organized crime, including creating domestic criminal offences (participation in an organized criminal group, money laundering, corruption and obstruction of justice); adopting new and sweeping frameworks for extradition, mutual legal assistance and law enforcement cooperation; and promoting training and technical assistance for building or upgrading the necessary capacity of national authorities. The UNTOC defines the terms \u2018organized criminal group\u2019, \u2018serious crime\u2019, and \u2018structured group\u2019 (as per section 3 of this module).", + "Paragraph": "United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2000) \n The UNTOC is the main international instrument in the fight against transnational organized crime. States that ratify this instrument commit themselves to taking a series of measures against transnational organized crime, including creating domestic criminal offences (participation in an organized criminal group, money laundering, corruption and obstruction of justice); adopting new and sweeping frameworks for extradition, mutual legal assistance and law enforcement cooperation; and promoting training and technical assistance for building or upgrading the necessary capacity of national authorities. The UNTOC defines the terms \u2018organized criminal group\u2019, \u2018serious crime\u2019, and \u2018structured group\u2019 (as per section 3 of this module).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -229710,14 +229710,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2000) \\n The UNTOC is the main international instrument in the fight against transnational organized crime.", + "Sentence": "United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2000) \n The UNTOC is the main international instrument in the fight against transnational organized crime.", "newParagraph": "united nation convention transnational organized crime 2000 n untoc main international instrument fight transnational organized crime state ratify instrument commit taking series measure transnational organized crime including creating domestic criminal offence participation organized criminal group money laundering corruption obstruction justice adopting new sweeping framework extradition mutual legal assistance law enforcement cooperation promoting training technical assistance building upgrading necessary capacity national authority untoc defines term organized criminal group serious crime structured group per section 3 module", "ProcessedSent": "united nation convention transnational organized crime 2000 n untoc main international instrument fight transnational organized crime", "SentID": 12761 }, { "ParagraphID": 3475, - "Paragraph": "United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2000) \\n The UNTOC is the main international instrument in the fight against transnational organized crime. States that ratify this instrument commit themselves to taking a series of measures against transnational organized crime, including creating domestic criminal offences (participation in an organized criminal group, money laundering, corruption and obstruction of justice); adopting new and sweeping frameworks for extradition, mutual legal assistance and law enforcement cooperation; and promoting training and technical assistance for building or upgrading the necessary capacity of national authorities. The UNTOC defines the terms \u2018organized criminal group\u2019, \u2018serious crime\u2019, and \u2018structured group\u2019 (as per section 3 of this module).", + "Paragraph": "United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2000) \n The UNTOC is the main international instrument in the fight against transnational organized crime. States that ratify this instrument commit themselves to taking a series of measures against transnational organized crime, including creating domestic criminal offences (participation in an organized criminal group, money laundering, corruption and obstruction of justice); adopting new and sweeping frameworks for extradition, mutual legal assistance and law enforcement cooperation; and promoting training and technical assistance for building or upgrading the necessary capacity of national authorities. The UNTOC defines the terms \u2018organized criminal group\u2019, \u2018serious crime\u2019, and \u2018structured group\u2019 (as per section 3 of this module).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -229735,7 +229735,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3475, - "Paragraph": "United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2000) \\n The UNTOC is the main international instrument in the fight against transnational organized crime. States that ratify this instrument commit themselves to taking a series of measures against transnational organized crime, including creating domestic criminal offences (participation in an organized criminal group, money laundering, corruption and obstruction of justice); adopting new and sweeping frameworks for extradition, mutual legal assistance and law enforcement cooperation; and promoting training and technical assistance for building or upgrading the necessary capacity of national authorities. The UNTOC defines the terms \u2018organized criminal group\u2019, \u2018serious crime\u2019, and \u2018structured group\u2019 (as per section 3 of this module).", + "Paragraph": "United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2000) \n The UNTOC is the main international instrument in the fight against transnational organized crime. States that ratify this instrument commit themselves to taking a series of measures against transnational organized crime, including creating domestic criminal offences (participation in an organized criminal group, money laundering, corruption and obstruction of justice); adopting new and sweeping frameworks for extradition, mutual legal assistance and law enforcement cooperation; and promoting training and technical assistance for building or upgrading the necessary capacity of national authorities. The UNTOC defines the terms \u2018organized criminal group\u2019, \u2018serious crime\u2019, and \u2018structured group\u2019 (as per section 3 of this module).", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -229753,7 +229753,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3476, - "Paragraph": "Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2000) \\n This is the first global legally binding instrument with an agreed definition on trafficking in persons. This definition is intended to facilitate convergence in national approaches with regard to the establishment of domestic criminal offences that would support efficient international cooperation in investigating and prosecuting trafficking in persons cases. An additional objective of the Protocol is to protect and assist the victims of trafficking with full respect for their human rights. ", + "Paragraph": "Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2000) \n This is the first global legally binding instrument with an agreed definition on trafficking in persons. This definition is intended to facilitate convergence in national approaches with regard to the establishment of domestic criminal offences that would support efficient international cooperation in investigating and prosecuting trafficking in persons cases. An additional objective of the Protocol is to protect and assist the victims of trafficking with full respect for their human rights. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -229764,14 +229764,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2000) \\n This is the first global legally binding instrument with an agreed definition on trafficking in persons.", + "Sentence": "Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2000) \n This is the first global legally binding instrument with an agreed definition on trafficking in persons.", "newParagraph": "protocol prevent suppress punish trafficking person especially woman child supplementing united nation convention transnational organized crime 2000 n first global legally binding instrument agreed definition trafficking person definition intended facilitate convergence national approach regard establishment domestic criminal offence would support efficient international cooperation investigating prosecuting trafficking person case additional objective protocol protect assist victim trafficking full respect human right ", "ProcessedSent": "protocol prevent suppress punish trafficking person especially woman child supplementing united nation convention transnational organized crime 2000 n first global legally binding instrument agreed definition trafficking person", "SentID": 12764 }, { "ParagraphID": 3476, - "Paragraph": "Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2000) \\n This is the first global legally binding instrument with an agreed definition on trafficking in persons. This definition is intended to facilitate convergence in national approaches with regard to the establishment of domestic criminal offences that would support efficient international cooperation in investigating and prosecuting trafficking in persons cases. An additional objective of the Protocol is to protect and assist the victims of trafficking with full respect for their human rights. ", + "Paragraph": "Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2000) \n This is the first global legally binding instrument with an agreed definition on trafficking in persons. This definition is intended to facilitate convergence in national approaches with regard to the establishment of domestic criminal offences that would support efficient international cooperation in investigating and prosecuting trafficking in persons cases. An additional objective of the Protocol is to protect and assist the victims of trafficking with full respect for their human rights. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -229789,7 +229789,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3476, - "Paragraph": "Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2000) \\n This is the first global legally binding instrument with an agreed definition on trafficking in persons. This definition is intended to facilitate convergence in national approaches with regard to the establishment of domestic criminal offences that would support efficient international cooperation in investigating and prosecuting trafficking in persons cases. An additional objective of the Protocol is to protect and assist the victims of trafficking with full respect for their human rights. ", + "Paragraph": "Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2000) \n This is the first global legally binding instrument with an agreed definition on trafficking in persons. This definition is intended to facilitate convergence in national approaches with regard to the establishment of domestic criminal offences that would support efficient international cooperation in investigating and prosecuting trafficking in persons cases. An additional objective of the Protocol is to protect and assist the victims of trafficking with full respect for their human rights. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -229807,7 +229807,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3477, - "Paragraph": "Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2000) \\n The Protocol deals with the growing problem of organized criminal groups who smuggle migrants. It marks the first time that a definition of smuggling of migrants was developed and agreed upon in a global international instrument. The Protocol aims at preventing and combating the smuggling of migrants, as well as promoting cooperation among States parties, while protecting the rights of smuggled migrants and preventing the worst forms of their exploitation, which often characterize the smuggling process. ", + "Paragraph": "Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2000) \n The Protocol deals with the growing problem of organized criminal groups who smuggle migrants. It marks the first time that a definition of smuggling of migrants was developed and agreed upon in a global international instrument. The Protocol aims at preventing and combating the smuggling of migrants, as well as promoting cooperation among States parties, while protecting the rights of smuggled migrants and preventing the worst forms of their exploitation, which often characterize the smuggling process. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -229818,14 +229818,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2000) \\n The Protocol deals with the growing problem of organized criminal groups who smuggle migrants.", + "Sentence": "Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2000) \n The Protocol deals with the growing problem of organized criminal groups who smuggle migrants.", "newParagraph": "protocol smuggling migrant land sea air supplementing united nation convention transnational organized crime 2000 n protocol deal growing problem organized criminal group smuggle migrant mark first time definition smuggling migrant developed agreed upon global international instrument protocol aim preventing combating smuggling migrant well promoting cooperation among state party protecting right smuggled migrant preventing worst form exploitation often characterize smuggling process ", "ProcessedSent": "protocol smuggling migrant land sea air supplementing united nation convention transnational organized crime 2000 n protocol deal growing problem organized criminal group smuggle migrant", "SentID": 12767 }, { "ParagraphID": 3477, - "Paragraph": "Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2000) \\n The Protocol deals with the growing problem of organized criminal groups who smuggle migrants. It marks the first time that a definition of smuggling of migrants was developed and agreed upon in a global international instrument. The Protocol aims at preventing and combating the smuggling of migrants, as well as promoting cooperation among States parties, while protecting the rights of smuggled migrants and preventing the worst forms of their exploitation, which often characterize the smuggling process. ", + "Paragraph": "Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2000) \n The Protocol deals with the growing problem of organized criminal groups who smuggle migrants. It marks the first time that a definition of smuggling of migrants was developed and agreed upon in a global international instrument. The Protocol aims at preventing and combating the smuggling of migrants, as well as promoting cooperation among States parties, while protecting the rights of smuggled migrants and preventing the worst forms of their exploitation, which often characterize the smuggling process. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -229843,7 +229843,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3477, - "Paragraph": "Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2000) \\n The Protocol deals with the growing problem of organized criminal groups who smuggle migrants. It marks the first time that a definition of smuggling of migrants was developed and agreed upon in a global international instrument. The Protocol aims at preventing and combating the smuggling of migrants, as well as promoting cooperation among States parties, while protecting the rights of smuggled migrants and preventing the worst forms of their exploitation, which often characterize the smuggling process. ", + "Paragraph": "Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2000) \n The Protocol deals with the growing problem of organized criminal groups who smuggle migrants. It marks the first time that a definition of smuggling of migrants was developed and agreed upon in a global international instrument. The Protocol aims at preventing and combating the smuggling of migrants, as well as promoting cooperation among States parties, while protecting the rights of smuggled migrants and preventing the worst forms of their exploitation, which often characterize the smuggling process. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -229861,7 +229861,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3478, - "Paragraph": "Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, supplementing the \\n United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2001) The objective of the Protocol, the first legally binding instrument on small arms adopted at the global level, is to promote, facilitate and strengthen cooperation among States parties in order to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. By ratifying the Protocol, States make a commitment to adopt a series of crime-control measures and implement in their domestic legal order three sets of normative provisions: the first one relates to the establishment of criminal offences related to illegal manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms on the basis of the Protocol requirements and definitions; the second to a system of Government authorizations or licencing intended to ensure legitimate manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms; and the third one to the marking and tracing of firearms. In addition to the Protocol, a number of non-legally binding instruments also apply to the illicit trade of small arms and light weapons.18", + "Paragraph": "Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, supplementing the \n United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2001) The objective of the Protocol, the first legally binding instrument on small arms adopted at the global level, is to promote, facilitate and strengthen cooperation among States parties in order to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. By ratifying the Protocol, States make a commitment to adopt a series of crime-control measures and implement in their domestic legal order three sets of normative provisions: the first one relates to the establishment of criminal offences related to illegal manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms on the basis of the Protocol requirements and definitions; the second to a system of Government authorizations or licencing intended to ensure legitimate manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms; and the third one to the marking and tracing of firearms. In addition to the Protocol, a number of non-legally binding instruments also apply to the illicit trade of small arms and light weapons.18", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -229872,14 +229872,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, supplementing the \\n United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2001) The objective of the Protocol, the first legally binding instrument on small arms adopted at the global level, is to promote, facilitate and strengthen cooperation among States parties in order to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition.", + "Sentence": "Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, supplementing the \n United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2001) The objective of the Protocol, the first legally binding instrument on small arms adopted at the global level, is to promote, facilitate and strengthen cooperation among States parties in order to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition.", "newParagraph": "protocol illicit manufacturing trafficking firearm part component ammunition supplementing n united nation convention transnational organized crime 2001 objective protocol first legally binding instrument small arm adopted global level promote facilitate strengthen cooperation among state party order prevent combat eradicate illicit manufacturing trafficking firearm part component ammunition ratifying protocol state make commitment adopt series crimecontrol measure implement domestic legal order three set normative provision first one relates establishment criminal offence related illegal manufacturing trafficking firearm basis protocol requirement definition second system government authorization licencing intended ensure legitimate manufacturing trafficking firearm third one marking tracing firearm addition protocol number nonlegally binding instrument also apply illicit trade small arm light weapons18", "ProcessedSent": "protocol illicit manufacturing trafficking firearm part component ammunition supplementing n united nation convention transnational organized crime 2001 objective protocol first legally binding instrument small arm adopted global level promote facilitate strengthen cooperation among state party order prevent combat eradicate illicit manufacturing trafficking firearm part component ammunition", "SentID": 12770 }, { "ParagraphID": 3478, - "Paragraph": "Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, supplementing the \\n United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2001) The objective of the Protocol, the first legally binding instrument on small arms adopted at the global level, is to promote, facilitate and strengthen cooperation among States parties in order to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. By ratifying the Protocol, States make a commitment to adopt a series of crime-control measures and implement in their domestic legal order three sets of normative provisions: the first one relates to the establishment of criminal offences related to illegal manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms on the basis of the Protocol requirements and definitions; the second to a system of Government authorizations or licencing intended to ensure legitimate manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms; and the third one to the marking and tracing of firearms. In addition to the Protocol, a number of non-legally binding instruments also apply to the illicit trade of small arms and light weapons.18", + "Paragraph": "Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, supplementing the \n United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2001) The objective of the Protocol, the first legally binding instrument on small arms adopted at the global level, is to promote, facilitate and strengthen cooperation among States parties in order to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. By ratifying the Protocol, States make a commitment to adopt a series of crime-control measures and implement in their domestic legal order three sets of normative provisions: the first one relates to the establishment of criminal offences related to illegal manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms on the basis of the Protocol requirements and definitions; the second to a system of Government authorizations or licencing intended to ensure legitimate manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms; and the third one to the marking and tracing of firearms. In addition to the Protocol, a number of non-legally binding instruments also apply to the illicit trade of small arms and light weapons.18", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -229897,7 +229897,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3478, - "Paragraph": "Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, supplementing the \\n United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2001) The objective of the Protocol, the first legally binding instrument on small arms adopted at the global level, is to promote, facilitate and strengthen cooperation among States parties in order to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. By ratifying the Protocol, States make a commitment to adopt a series of crime-control measures and implement in their domestic legal order three sets of normative provisions: the first one relates to the establishment of criminal offences related to illegal manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms on the basis of the Protocol requirements and definitions; the second to a system of Government authorizations or licencing intended to ensure legitimate manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms; and the third one to the marking and tracing of firearms. In addition to the Protocol, a number of non-legally binding instruments also apply to the illicit trade of small arms and light weapons.18", + "Paragraph": "Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, supplementing the \n United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2001) The objective of the Protocol, the first legally binding instrument on small arms adopted at the global level, is to promote, facilitate and strengthen cooperation among States parties in order to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition. By ratifying the Protocol, States make a commitment to adopt a series of crime-control measures and implement in their domestic legal order three sets of normative provisions: the first one relates to the establishment of criminal offences related to illegal manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms on the basis of the Protocol requirements and definitions; the second to a system of Government authorizations or licencing intended to ensure legitimate manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms; and the third one to the marking and tracing of firearms. In addition to the Protocol, a number of non-legally binding instruments also apply to the illicit trade of small arms and light weapons.18", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -229915,7 +229915,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3479, - "Paragraph": "Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961 as amended by the 1972 Protocol \\n This Convention aims to combat drug abuse by coordinated international action. There are two forms of intervention and control that work together. First, the Convention seeks to limit the possession, use, trade, distribution, import, export, manufacture and production of drugs exclusively to medical and scientific purposes. Second, it combats drug trafficking through international cooperation to deter and discourage drug traffickers.", + "Paragraph": "Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961 as amended by the 1972 Protocol \n This Convention aims to combat drug abuse by coordinated international action. There are two forms of intervention and control that work together. First, the Convention seeks to limit the possession, use, trade, distribution, import, export, manufacture and production of drugs exclusively to medical and scientific purposes. Second, it combats drug trafficking through international cooperation to deter and discourage drug traffickers.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -229926,14 +229926,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961 as amended by the 1972 Protocol \\n This Convention aims to combat drug abuse by coordinated international action.", + "Sentence": "Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961 as amended by the 1972 Protocol \n This Convention aims to combat drug abuse by coordinated international action.", "newParagraph": "single convention narcotic drug 1961 amended 1972 protocol n convention aim combat drug abuse coordinated international action two form intervention control work together first convention seek limit possession use trade distribution import export manufacture production drug exclusively medical scientific purpose second combat drug trafficking international cooperation deter discourage drug trafficker", "ProcessedSent": "single convention narcotic drug 1961 amended 1972 protocol n convention aim combat drug abuse coordinated international action", "SentID": 12773 }, { "ParagraphID": 3479, - "Paragraph": "Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961 as amended by the 1972 Protocol \\n This Convention aims to combat drug abuse by coordinated international action. There are two forms of intervention and control that work together. First, the Convention seeks to limit the possession, use, trade, distribution, import, export, manufacture and production of drugs exclusively to medical and scientific purposes. Second, it combats drug trafficking through international cooperation to deter and discourage drug traffickers.", + "Paragraph": "Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961 as amended by the 1972 Protocol \n This Convention aims to combat drug abuse by coordinated international action. There are two forms of intervention and control that work together. First, the Convention seeks to limit the possession, use, trade, distribution, import, export, manufacture and production of drugs exclusively to medical and scientific purposes. Second, it combats drug trafficking through international cooperation to deter and discourage drug traffickers.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -229951,7 +229951,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3479, - "Paragraph": "Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961 as amended by the 1972 Protocol \\n This Convention aims to combat drug abuse by coordinated international action. There are two forms of intervention and control that work together. First, the Convention seeks to limit the possession, use, trade, distribution, import, export, manufacture and production of drugs exclusively to medical and scientific purposes. Second, it combats drug trafficking through international cooperation to deter and discourage drug traffickers.", + "Paragraph": "Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961 as amended by the 1972 Protocol \n This Convention aims to combat drug abuse by coordinated international action. There are two forms of intervention and control that work together. First, the Convention seeks to limit the possession, use, trade, distribution, import, export, manufacture and production of drugs exclusively to medical and scientific purposes. Second, it combats drug trafficking through international cooperation to deter and discourage drug traffickers.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -229969,7 +229969,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3479, - "Paragraph": "Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961 as amended by the 1972 Protocol \\n This Convention aims to combat drug abuse by coordinated international action. There are two forms of intervention and control that work together. First, the Convention seeks to limit the possession, use, trade, distribution, import, export, manufacture and production of drugs exclusively to medical and scientific purposes. Second, it combats drug trafficking through international cooperation to deter and discourage drug traffickers.", + "Paragraph": "Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961 as amended by the 1972 Protocol \n This Convention aims to combat drug abuse by coordinated international action. There are two forms of intervention and control that work together. First, the Convention seeks to limit the possession, use, trade, distribution, import, export, manufacture and production of drugs exclusively to medical and scientific purposes. Second, it combats drug trafficking through international cooperation to deter and discourage drug traffickers.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -229987,7 +229987,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3480, - "Paragraph": "Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971 \\n The Convention establishes an international control system for psychotropic substances in response to the diversification and expansion of the spectrum of drugs of abuse. The Convention introduces controls over a number of synthetic drugs, balancing their abuse against their therapeutic value.", + "Paragraph": "Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971 \n The Convention establishes an international control system for psychotropic substances in response to the diversification and expansion of the spectrum of drugs of abuse. The Convention introduces controls over a number of synthetic drugs, balancing their abuse against their therapeutic value.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -229998,14 +229998,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971 \\n The Convention establishes an international control system for psychotropic substances in response to the diversification and expansion of the spectrum of drugs of abuse.", + "Sentence": "Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971 \n The Convention establishes an international control system for psychotropic substances in response to the diversification and expansion of the spectrum of drugs of abuse.", "newParagraph": "convention psychotropic substance 1971 n convention establishes international control system psychotropic substance response diversification expansion spectrum drug abuse convention introduces control number synthetic drug balancing abuse therapeutic value", "ProcessedSent": "convention psychotropic substance 1971 n convention establishes international control system psychotropic substance response diversification expansion spectrum drug abuse", "SentID": 12777 }, { "ParagraphID": 3480, - "Paragraph": "Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971 \\n The Convention establishes an international control system for psychotropic substances in response to the diversification and expansion of the spectrum of drugs of abuse. The Convention introduces controls over a number of synthetic drugs, balancing their abuse against their therapeutic value.", + "Paragraph": "Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971 \n The Convention establishes an international control system for psychotropic substances in response to the diversification and expansion of the spectrum of drugs of abuse. The Convention introduces controls over a number of synthetic drugs, balancing their abuse against their therapeutic value.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230023,7 +230023,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3481, - "Paragraph": "United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances of 1988 \\n This Convention provides comprehensive measures against drug trafficking, including provisions against money laundering and the diversion of precursor chemicals. It provides for international cooperation through, for example, extradition of drug traffickers, controlled deliveries and transfer of proceedings.", + "Paragraph": "United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances of 1988 \n This Convention provides comprehensive measures against drug trafficking, including provisions against money laundering and the diversion of precursor chemicals. It provides for international cooperation through, for example, extradition of drug traffickers, controlled deliveries and transfer of proceedings.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230034,14 +230034,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances of 1988 \\n This Convention provides comprehensive measures against drug trafficking, including provisions against money laundering and the diversion of precursor chemicals.", + "Sentence": "United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances of 1988 \n This Convention provides comprehensive measures against drug trafficking, including provisions against money laundering and the diversion of precursor chemicals.", "newParagraph": "united nation convention illicit traffic narcotic drug psychotropic substance 1988 n convention provides comprehensive measure drug trafficking including provision money laundering diversion precursor chemical provides international cooperation example extradition drug trafficker controlled delivery transfer proceeding", "ProcessedSent": "united nation convention illicit traffic narcotic drug psychotropic substance 1988 n convention provides comprehensive measure drug trafficking including provision money laundering diversion precursor chemical", "SentID": 12779 }, { "ParagraphID": 3481, - "Paragraph": "United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances of 1988 \\n This Convention provides comprehensive measures against drug trafficking, including provisions against money laundering and the diversion of precursor chemicals. It provides for international cooperation through, for example, extradition of drug traffickers, controlled deliveries and transfer of proceedings.", + "Paragraph": "United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances of 1988 \n This Convention provides comprehensive measures against drug trafficking, including provisions against money laundering and the diversion of precursor chemicals. It provides for international cooperation through, for example, extradition of drug traffickers, controlled deliveries and transfer of proceedings.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230059,7 +230059,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3482, - "Paragraph": "United Nations Convention against Corruption (2003) \\n This Convention is the only legally binding universal anti-corruption instrument. It covers five main areas: preventive measures, criminalization and law enforcement, international cooperation, asset recovery, and technical assistance and information exchange. The Convention covers many different forms of corruption, such as bribery, trading in influence and abuse of functions.", + "Paragraph": "United Nations Convention against Corruption (2003) \n This Convention is the only legally binding universal anti-corruption instrument. It covers five main areas: preventive measures, criminalization and law enforcement, international cooperation, asset recovery, and technical assistance and information exchange. The Convention covers many different forms of corruption, such as bribery, trading in influence and abuse of functions.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230070,14 +230070,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "United Nations Convention against Corruption (2003) \\n This Convention is the only legally binding universal anti-corruption instrument.", + "Sentence": "United Nations Convention against Corruption (2003) \n This Convention is the only legally binding universal anti-corruption instrument.", "newParagraph": "united nation convention corruption 2003 n convention legally binding universal anticorruption instrument cover five main area preventive measure criminalization law enforcement international cooperation asset recovery technical assistance information exchange convention cover many different form corruption bribery trading influence abuse function", "ProcessedSent": "united nation convention corruption 2003 n convention legally binding universal anticorruption instrument", "SentID": 12781 }, { "ParagraphID": 3482, - "Paragraph": "United Nations Convention against Corruption (2003) \\n This Convention is the only legally binding universal anti-corruption instrument. It covers five main areas: preventive measures, criminalization and law enforcement, international cooperation, asset recovery, and technical assistance and information exchange. The Convention covers many different forms of corruption, such as bribery, trading in influence and abuse of functions.", + "Paragraph": "United Nations Convention against Corruption (2003) \n This Convention is the only legally binding universal anti-corruption instrument. It covers five main areas: preventive measures, criminalization and law enforcement, international cooperation, asset recovery, and technical assistance and information exchange. The Convention covers many different forms of corruption, such as bribery, trading in influence and abuse of functions.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230095,7 +230095,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3482, - "Paragraph": "United Nations Convention against Corruption (2003) \\n This Convention is the only legally binding universal anti-corruption instrument. It covers five main areas: preventive measures, criminalization and law enforcement, international cooperation, asset recovery, and technical assistance and information exchange. The Convention covers many different forms of corruption, such as bribery, trading in influence and abuse of functions.", + "Paragraph": "United Nations Convention against Corruption (2003) \n This Convention is the only legally binding universal anti-corruption instrument. It covers five main areas: preventive measures, criminalization and law enforcement, international cooperation, asset recovery, and technical assistance and information exchange. The Convention covers many different forms of corruption, such as bribery, trading in influence and abuse of functions.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230113,7 +230113,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3483, - "Paragraph": "Security Council Resolutions \\n The United Nations Security Council has increasingly recognized the role that organized crime and illicit markets play in sustaining and fuelling contemporary conflicts. Since the UNTOC was adopted in 2000, the UN Security Council has passed hundreds of resolutions on organized crime in specific countries, missions or regions. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2220 (2015) on small arms \\n The Council emphasizes that the illicit trafficking in small arms and light weapons can aid terrorism and illegal armed groups and facilitate increasing levels of transnational organized crime, and underscores that such illicit trafficking could harm civilians, including women and children, create instability and long-term governance challenges, and complicate conflict resolution. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2331 (2016) on trafficking in persons in conflict situations, including linkages with the activities of armed groups, terrorism and sexual violence in conflict \\n The Security Council recognizes the connection between trafficking in persons, sexual violence, terrorism and other transnational organized criminal activities that can prolong and exacerbate conflict and instability or intensify its impact on civilian populations. The Council condemns all acts of trafficking, particularly the sale or trade in persons undertaken by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as Da\u2019esh), and recognizes the importance of collecting and preserving evidence relating to such acts to ensure that those responsible can be held accountable. \\n\\n Security Council Resolution 2388 (2017) on trafficking in persons in armed conflict \\n This resolution recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons in areas affected by armed conflict and post- conflict situations can be for the purpose of various forms of exploitation\u201d, including sexual exploitation and the recruitment of child soldiers. The resolution underlines the importance of providing \u201cappropriate care, assistance and services for their physical, psychological and social recovery, rehabilitation and reintegration, in full respect of their human rights\u201d. The resolution also recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons entails the violation or abuse of human rights\u201d and underscores \u201cthat certain acts or offences associated with trafficking in persons in the context of armed conflict may constitute war crimes\u201d, and it notes States\u2019 responsibility to \u201cprosecute those responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes as well as other crimes\u201d. The resolution calls for the \u201ctraining of relevant personnel of special political and peacekeeping missions\u201d. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2462 (2019) on the financing of terrorism through illicit activities and sanctions lists \\n This resolution reaffirms the Security Council\u2019s decision in its resolution 1373 (2001) that all States shall prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts, including through organized criminal activity, and shall refrain from providing support to those involved in them. Furthermore, the resolution urges all States to participate actively in implementing and updating the ISIL (Da\u2019esh) and Al-Qaida Sanctions List and to consider including, when submitting new listing requests, individuals and entities involved in the financing of terrorism. \\n\\n Security Council Resolution 2482 (2019) on threats to international peace and security caused by international terrorism and organized crime \\n This resolution underlines that organized crime, along with terrorism and violent extremism, whether domestic or transnational, \u201cmay exacerbate conflicts in affected regions, and may contribute to undermining affected States, specifically their security, stability, governance, social and economic development\u201d and notes that organized criminal groups \u201ccan, in some cases and in some regions, complicate conflict prevention and resolution efforts\u201d. The resolution also notes the impact of the illicit drug trade, trafficking in persons and arms trafficking, and their links to corruption in furthering the financing of terrorism and fuelling conflict. ", + "Paragraph": "Security Council Resolutions \n The United Nations Security Council has increasingly recognized the role that organized crime and illicit markets play in sustaining and fuelling contemporary conflicts. Since the UNTOC was adopted in 2000, the UN Security Council has passed hundreds of resolutions on organized crime in specific countries, missions or regions. \n\n Security Council resolution 2220 (2015) on small arms \n The Council emphasizes that the illicit trafficking in small arms and light weapons can aid terrorism and illegal armed groups and facilitate increasing levels of transnational organized crime, and underscores that such illicit trafficking could harm civilians, including women and children, create instability and long-term governance challenges, and complicate conflict resolution. \n\n Security Council resolution 2331 (2016) on trafficking in persons in conflict situations, including linkages with the activities of armed groups, terrorism and sexual violence in conflict \n The Security Council recognizes the connection between trafficking in persons, sexual violence, terrorism and other transnational organized criminal activities that can prolong and exacerbate conflict and instability or intensify its impact on civilian populations. The Council condemns all acts of trafficking, particularly the sale or trade in persons undertaken by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as Da\u2019esh), and recognizes the importance of collecting and preserving evidence relating to such acts to ensure that those responsible can be held accountable. \n\n Security Council Resolution 2388 (2017) on trafficking in persons in armed conflict \n This resolution recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons in areas affected by armed conflict and post- conflict situations can be for the purpose of various forms of exploitation\u201d, including sexual exploitation and the recruitment of child soldiers. The resolution underlines the importance of providing \u201cappropriate care, assistance and services for their physical, psychological and social recovery, rehabilitation and reintegration, in full respect of their human rights\u201d. The resolution also recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons entails the violation or abuse of human rights\u201d and underscores \u201cthat certain acts or offences associated with trafficking in persons in the context of armed conflict may constitute war crimes\u201d, and it notes States\u2019 responsibility to \u201cprosecute those responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes as well as other crimes\u201d. The resolution calls for the \u201ctraining of relevant personnel of special political and peacekeeping missions\u201d. \n\n Security Council resolution 2462 (2019) on the financing of terrorism through illicit activities and sanctions lists \n This resolution reaffirms the Security Council\u2019s decision in its resolution 1373 (2001) that all States shall prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts, including through organized criminal activity, and shall refrain from providing support to those involved in them. Furthermore, the resolution urges all States to participate actively in implementing and updating the ISIL (Da\u2019esh) and Al-Qaida Sanctions List and to consider including, when submitting new listing requests, individuals and entities involved in the financing of terrorism. \n\n Security Council Resolution 2482 (2019) on threats to international peace and security caused by international terrorism and organized crime \n This resolution underlines that organized crime, along with terrorism and violent extremism, whether domestic or transnational, \u201cmay exacerbate conflicts in affected regions, and may contribute to undermining affected States, specifically their security, stability, governance, social and economic development\u201d and notes that organized criminal groups \u201ccan, in some cases and in some regions, complicate conflict prevention and resolution efforts\u201d. The resolution also notes the impact of the illicit drug trade, trafficking in persons and arms trafficking, and their links to corruption in furthering the financing of terrorism and fuelling conflict. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230124,14 +230124,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Security Council Resolutions \\n The United Nations Security Council has increasingly recognized the role that organized crime and illicit markets play in sustaining and fuelling contemporary conflicts.", + "Sentence": "Security Council Resolutions \n The United Nations Security Council has increasingly recognized the role that organized crime and illicit markets play in sustaining and fuelling contemporary conflicts.", "newParagraph": "security council resolution n united nation security council increasingly recognized role organized crime illicit market play sustaining fuelling contemporary conflict since untoc adopted 2000 un security council passed hundred resolution organized crime specific country mission region nn security council resolution 2220 2015 small arm n council emphasizes illicit trafficking small arm light weapon aid terrorism illegal armed group facilitate increasing level transnational organized crime underscore illicit trafficking could harm civilian including woman child create instability longterm governance challenge complicate conflict resolution nn security council resolution 2331 2016 trafficking person conflict situation including linkage activity armed group terrorism sexual violence conflict n security council recognizes connection trafficking person sexual violence terrorism transnational organized criminal activity prolong exacerbate conflict instability intensify impact civilian population council condemns act trafficking particularly sale trade person undertaken islamic state iraq levant isil also known da esh recognizes importance collecting preserving evidence relating act ensure responsible held accountable nn security council resolution 2388 2017 trafficking person armed conflict n resolution recognizes trafficking person area affected armed conflict post conflict situation purpose various form exploitation including sexual exploitation recruitment child soldier resolution underline importance providing appropriate care assistance service physical psychological social recovery rehabilitation reintegration full respect human right resolution also recognizes trafficking person entail violation abuse human right underscore certain act offence associated trafficking person context armed conflict may constitute war crime note state responsibility prosecute responsible genocide crime humanity war crime well crime resolution call training relevant personnel special political peacekeeping mission nn security council resolution 2462 2019 financing terrorism illicit activity sanction list n resolution reaffirms security council decision resolution 1373 2001 state shall prevent suppress financing terrorist act including organized criminal activity shall refrain providing support involved furthermore resolution urge state participate actively implementing updating isil da esh alqaida sanction list consider including submitting new listing request individual entity involved financing terrorism nn security council resolution 2482 2019 threat international peace security caused international terrorism organized crime n resolution underline organized crime along terrorism violent extremism whether domestic transnational may exacerbate conflict affected region may contribute undermining affected state specifically security stability governance social economic development note organized criminal group case region complicate conflict prevention resolution effort resolution also note impact illicit drug trade trafficking person arm trafficking link corruption furthering financing terrorism fuelling conflict ", "ProcessedSent": "security council resolution n united nation security council increasingly recognized role organized crime illicit market play sustaining fuelling contemporary conflict", "SentID": 12784 }, { "ParagraphID": 3483, - "Paragraph": "Security Council Resolutions \\n The United Nations Security Council has increasingly recognized the role that organized crime and illicit markets play in sustaining and fuelling contemporary conflicts. Since the UNTOC was adopted in 2000, the UN Security Council has passed hundreds of resolutions on organized crime in specific countries, missions or regions. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2220 (2015) on small arms \\n The Council emphasizes that the illicit trafficking in small arms and light weapons can aid terrorism and illegal armed groups and facilitate increasing levels of transnational organized crime, and underscores that such illicit trafficking could harm civilians, including women and children, create instability and long-term governance challenges, and complicate conflict resolution. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2331 (2016) on trafficking in persons in conflict situations, including linkages with the activities of armed groups, terrorism and sexual violence in conflict \\n The Security Council recognizes the connection between trafficking in persons, sexual violence, terrorism and other transnational organized criminal activities that can prolong and exacerbate conflict and instability or intensify its impact on civilian populations. The Council condemns all acts of trafficking, particularly the sale or trade in persons undertaken by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as Da\u2019esh), and recognizes the importance of collecting and preserving evidence relating to such acts to ensure that those responsible can be held accountable. \\n\\n Security Council Resolution 2388 (2017) on trafficking in persons in armed conflict \\n This resolution recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons in areas affected by armed conflict and post- conflict situations can be for the purpose of various forms of exploitation\u201d, including sexual exploitation and the recruitment of child soldiers. The resolution underlines the importance of providing \u201cappropriate care, assistance and services for their physical, psychological and social recovery, rehabilitation and reintegration, in full respect of their human rights\u201d. The resolution also recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons entails the violation or abuse of human rights\u201d and underscores \u201cthat certain acts or offences associated with trafficking in persons in the context of armed conflict may constitute war crimes\u201d, and it notes States\u2019 responsibility to \u201cprosecute those responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes as well as other crimes\u201d. The resolution calls for the \u201ctraining of relevant personnel of special political and peacekeeping missions\u201d. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2462 (2019) on the financing of terrorism through illicit activities and sanctions lists \\n This resolution reaffirms the Security Council\u2019s decision in its resolution 1373 (2001) that all States shall prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts, including through organized criminal activity, and shall refrain from providing support to those involved in them. Furthermore, the resolution urges all States to participate actively in implementing and updating the ISIL (Da\u2019esh) and Al-Qaida Sanctions List and to consider including, when submitting new listing requests, individuals and entities involved in the financing of terrorism. \\n\\n Security Council Resolution 2482 (2019) on threats to international peace and security caused by international terrorism and organized crime \\n This resolution underlines that organized crime, along with terrorism and violent extremism, whether domestic or transnational, \u201cmay exacerbate conflicts in affected regions, and may contribute to undermining affected States, specifically their security, stability, governance, social and economic development\u201d and notes that organized criminal groups \u201ccan, in some cases and in some regions, complicate conflict prevention and resolution efforts\u201d. The resolution also notes the impact of the illicit drug trade, trafficking in persons and arms trafficking, and their links to corruption in furthering the financing of terrorism and fuelling conflict. ", + "Paragraph": "Security Council Resolutions \n The United Nations Security Council has increasingly recognized the role that organized crime and illicit markets play in sustaining and fuelling contemporary conflicts. Since the UNTOC was adopted in 2000, the UN Security Council has passed hundreds of resolutions on organized crime in specific countries, missions or regions. \n\n Security Council resolution 2220 (2015) on small arms \n The Council emphasizes that the illicit trafficking in small arms and light weapons can aid terrorism and illegal armed groups and facilitate increasing levels of transnational organized crime, and underscores that such illicit trafficking could harm civilians, including women and children, create instability and long-term governance challenges, and complicate conflict resolution. \n\n Security Council resolution 2331 (2016) on trafficking in persons in conflict situations, including linkages with the activities of armed groups, terrorism and sexual violence in conflict \n The Security Council recognizes the connection between trafficking in persons, sexual violence, terrorism and other transnational organized criminal activities that can prolong and exacerbate conflict and instability or intensify its impact on civilian populations. The Council condemns all acts of trafficking, particularly the sale or trade in persons undertaken by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as Da\u2019esh), and recognizes the importance of collecting and preserving evidence relating to such acts to ensure that those responsible can be held accountable. \n\n Security Council Resolution 2388 (2017) on trafficking in persons in armed conflict \n This resolution recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons in areas affected by armed conflict and post- conflict situations can be for the purpose of various forms of exploitation\u201d, including sexual exploitation and the recruitment of child soldiers. The resolution underlines the importance of providing \u201cappropriate care, assistance and services for their physical, psychological and social recovery, rehabilitation and reintegration, in full respect of their human rights\u201d. The resolution also recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons entails the violation or abuse of human rights\u201d and underscores \u201cthat certain acts or offences associated with trafficking in persons in the context of armed conflict may constitute war crimes\u201d, and it notes States\u2019 responsibility to \u201cprosecute those responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes as well as other crimes\u201d. The resolution calls for the \u201ctraining of relevant personnel of special political and peacekeeping missions\u201d. \n\n Security Council resolution 2462 (2019) on the financing of terrorism through illicit activities and sanctions lists \n This resolution reaffirms the Security Council\u2019s decision in its resolution 1373 (2001) that all States shall prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts, including through organized criminal activity, and shall refrain from providing support to those involved in them. Furthermore, the resolution urges all States to participate actively in implementing and updating the ISIL (Da\u2019esh) and Al-Qaida Sanctions List and to consider including, when submitting new listing requests, individuals and entities involved in the financing of terrorism. \n\n Security Council Resolution 2482 (2019) on threats to international peace and security caused by international terrorism and organized crime \n This resolution underlines that organized crime, along with terrorism and violent extremism, whether domestic or transnational, \u201cmay exacerbate conflicts in affected regions, and may contribute to undermining affected States, specifically their security, stability, governance, social and economic development\u201d and notes that organized criminal groups \u201ccan, in some cases and in some regions, complicate conflict prevention and resolution efforts\u201d. The resolution also notes the impact of the illicit drug trade, trafficking in persons and arms trafficking, and their links to corruption in furthering the financing of terrorism and fuelling conflict. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230149,7 +230149,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3483, - "Paragraph": "Security Council Resolutions \\n The United Nations Security Council has increasingly recognized the role that organized crime and illicit markets play in sustaining and fuelling contemporary conflicts. Since the UNTOC was adopted in 2000, the UN Security Council has passed hundreds of resolutions on organized crime in specific countries, missions or regions. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2220 (2015) on small arms \\n The Council emphasizes that the illicit trafficking in small arms and light weapons can aid terrorism and illegal armed groups and facilitate increasing levels of transnational organized crime, and underscores that such illicit trafficking could harm civilians, including women and children, create instability and long-term governance challenges, and complicate conflict resolution. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2331 (2016) on trafficking in persons in conflict situations, including linkages with the activities of armed groups, terrorism and sexual violence in conflict \\n The Security Council recognizes the connection between trafficking in persons, sexual violence, terrorism and other transnational organized criminal activities that can prolong and exacerbate conflict and instability or intensify its impact on civilian populations. The Council condemns all acts of trafficking, particularly the sale or trade in persons undertaken by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as Da\u2019esh), and recognizes the importance of collecting and preserving evidence relating to such acts to ensure that those responsible can be held accountable. \\n\\n Security Council Resolution 2388 (2017) on trafficking in persons in armed conflict \\n This resolution recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons in areas affected by armed conflict and post- conflict situations can be for the purpose of various forms of exploitation\u201d, including sexual exploitation and the recruitment of child soldiers. The resolution underlines the importance of providing \u201cappropriate care, assistance and services for their physical, psychological and social recovery, rehabilitation and reintegration, in full respect of their human rights\u201d. The resolution also recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons entails the violation or abuse of human rights\u201d and underscores \u201cthat certain acts or offences associated with trafficking in persons in the context of armed conflict may constitute war crimes\u201d, and it notes States\u2019 responsibility to \u201cprosecute those responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes as well as other crimes\u201d. The resolution calls for the \u201ctraining of relevant personnel of special political and peacekeeping missions\u201d. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2462 (2019) on the financing of terrorism through illicit activities and sanctions lists \\n This resolution reaffirms the Security Council\u2019s decision in its resolution 1373 (2001) that all States shall prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts, including through organized criminal activity, and shall refrain from providing support to those involved in them. Furthermore, the resolution urges all States to participate actively in implementing and updating the ISIL (Da\u2019esh) and Al-Qaida Sanctions List and to consider including, when submitting new listing requests, individuals and entities involved in the financing of terrorism. \\n\\n Security Council Resolution 2482 (2019) on threats to international peace and security caused by international terrorism and organized crime \\n This resolution underlines that organized crime, along with terrorism and violent extremism, whether domestic or transnational, \u201cmay exacerbate conflicts in affected regions, and may contribute to undermining affected States, specifically their security, stability, governance, social and economic development\u201d and notes that organized criminal groups \u201ccan, in some cases and in some regions, complicate conflict prevention and resolution efforts\u201d. The resolution also notes the impact of the illicit drug trade, trafficking in persons and arms trafficking, and their links to corruption in furthering the financing of terrorism and fuelling conflict. ", + "Paragraph": "Security Council Resolutions \n The United Nations Security Council has increasingly recognized the role that organized crime and illicit markets play in sustaining and fuelling contemporary conflicts. Since the UNTOC was adopted in 2000, the UN Security Council has passed hundreds of resolutions on organized crime in specific countries, missions or regions. \n\n Security Council resolution 2220 (2015) on small arms \n The Council emphasizes that the illicit trafficking in small arms and light weapons can aid terrorism and illegal armed groups and facilitate increasing levels of transnational organized crime, and underscores that such illicit trafficking could harm civilians, including women and children, create instability and long-term governance challenges, and complicate conflict resolution. \n\n Security Council resolution 2331 (2016) on trafficking in persons in conflict situations, including linkages with the activities of armed groups, terrorism and sexual violence in conflict \n The Security Council recognizes the connection between trafficking in persons, sexual violence, terrorism and other transnational organized criminal activities that can prolong and exacerbate conflict and instability or intensify its impact on civilian populations. The Council condemns all acts of trafficking, particularly the sale or trade in persons undertaken by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as Da\u2019esh), and recognizes the importance of collecting and preserving evidence relating to such acts to ensure that those responsible can be held accountable. \n\n Security Council Resolution 2388 (2017) on trafficking in persons in armed conflict \n This resolution recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons in areas affected by armed conflict and post- conflict situations can be for the purpose of various forms of exploitation\u201d, including sexual exploitation and the recruitment of child soldiers. The resolution underlines the importance of providing \u201cappropriate care, assistance and services for their physical, psychological and social recovery, rehabilitation and reintegration, in full respect of their human rights\u201d. The resolution also recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons entails the violation or abuse of human rights\u201d and underscores \u201cthat certain acts or offences associated with trafficking in persons in the context of armed conflict may constitute war crimes\u201d, and it notes States\u2019 responsibility to \u201cprosecute those responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes as well as other crimes\u201d. The resolution calls for the \u201ctraining of relevant personnel of special political and peacekeeping missions\u201d. \n\n Security Council resolution 2462 (2019) on the financing of terrorism through illicit activities and sanctions lists \n This resolution reaffirms the Security Council\u2019s decision in its resolution 1373 (2001) that all States shall prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts, including through organized criminal activity, and shall refrain from providing support to those involved in them. Furthermore, the resolution urges all States to participate actively in implementing and updating the ISIL (Da\u2019esh) and Al-Qaida Sanctions List and to consider including, when submitting new listing requests, individuals and entities involved in the financing of terrorism. \n\n Security Council Resolution 2482 (2019) on threats to international peace and security caused by international terrorism and organized crime \n This resolution underlines that organized crime, along with terrorism and violent extremism, whether domestic or transnational, \u201cmay exacerbate conflicts in affected regions, and may contribute to undermining affected States, specifically their security, stability, governance, social and economic development\u201d and notes that organized criminal groups \u201ccan, in some cases and in some regions, complicate conflict prevention and resolution efforts\u201d. The resolution also notes the impact of the illicit drug trade, trafficking in persons and arms trafficking, and their links to corruption in furthering the financing of terrorism and fuelling conflict. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230160,14 +230160,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Security Council resolution 2220 (2015) on small arms \\n The Council emphasizes that the illicit trafficking in small arms and light weapons can aid terrorism and illegal armed groups and facilitate increasing levels of transnational organized crime, and underscores that such illicit trafficking could harm civilians, including women and children, create instability and long-term governance challenges, and complicate conflict resolution.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Security Council resolution 2220 (2015) on small arms \n The Council emphasizes that the illicit trafficking in small arms and light weapons can aid terrorism and illegal armed groups and facilitate increasing levels of transnational organized crime, and underscores that such illicit trafficking could harm civilians, including women and children, create instability and long-term governance challenges, and complicate conflict resolution.", "newParagraph": "security council resolution n united nation security council increasingly recognized role organized crime illicit market play sustaining fuelling contemporary conflict since untoc adopted 2000 un security council passed hundred resolution organized crime specific country mission region nn security council resolution 2220 2015 small arm n council emphasizes illicit trafficking small arm light weapon aid terrorism illegal armed group facilitate increasing level transnational organized crime underscore illicit trafficking could harm civilian including woman child create instability longterm governance challenge complicate conflict resolution nn security council resolution 2331 2016 trafficking person conflict situation including linkage activity armed group terrorism sexual violence conflict n security council recognizes connection trafficking person sexual violence terrorism transnational organized criminal activity prolong exacerbate conflict instability intensify impact civilian population council condemns act trafficking particularly sale trade person undertaken islamic state iraq levant isil also known da esh recognizes importance collecting preserving evidence relating act ensure responsible held accountable nn security council resolution 2388 2017 trafficking person armed conflict n resolution recognizes trafficking person area affected armed conflict post conflict situation purpose various form exploitation including sexual exploitation recruitment child soldier resolution underline importance providing appropriate care assistance service physical psychological social recovery rehabilitation reintegration full respect human right resolution also recognizes trafficking person entail violation abuse human right underscore certain act offence associated trafficking person context armed conflict may constitute war crime note state responsibility prosecute responsible genocide crime humanity war crime well crime resolution call training relevant personnel special political peacekeeping mission nn security council resolution 2462 2019 financing terrorism illicit activity sanction list n resolution reaffirms security council decision resolution 1373 2001 state shall prevent suppress financing terrorist act including organized criminal activity shall refrain providing support involved furthermore resolution urge state participate actively implementing updating isil da esh alqaida sanction list consider including submitting new listing request individual entity involved financing terrorism nn security council resolution 2482 2019 threat international peace security caused international terrorism organized crime n resolution underline organized crime along terrorism violent extremism whether domestic transnational may exacerbate conflict affected region may contribute undermining affected state specifically security stability governance social economic development note organized criminal group case region complicate conflict prevention resolution effort resolution also note impact illicit drug trade trafficking person arm trafficking link corruption furthering financing terrorism fuelling conflict ", "ProcessedSent": "nn security council resolution 2220 2015 small arm n council emphasizes illicit trafficking small arm light weapon aid terrorism illegal armed group facilitate increasing level transnational organized crime underscore illicit trafficking could harm civilian including woman child create instability longterm governance challenge complicate conflict resolution", "SentID": 12786 }, { "ParagraphID": 3483, - "Paragraph": "Security Council Resolutions \\n The United Nations Security Council has increasingly recognized the role that organized crime and illicit markets play in sustaining and fuelling contemporary conflicts. Since the UNTOC was adopted in 2000, the UN Security Council has passed hundreds of resolutions on organized crime in specific countries, missions or regions. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2220 (2015) on small arms \\n The Council emphasizes that the illicit trafficking in small arms and light weapons can aid terrorism and illegal armed groups and facilitate increasing levels of transnational organized crime, and underscores that such illicit trafficking could harm civilians, including women and children, create instability and long-term governance challenges, and complicate conflict resolution. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2331 (2016) on trafficking in persons in conflict situations, including linkages with the activities of armed groups, terrorism and sexual violence in conflict \\n The Security Council recognizes the connection between trafficking in persons, sexual violence, terrorism and other transnational organized criminal activities that can prolong and exacerbate conflict and instability or intensify its impact on civilian populations. The Council condemns all acts of trafficking, particularly the sale or trade in persons undertaken by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as Da\u2019esh), and recognizes the importance of collecting and preserving evidence relating to such acts to ensure that those responsible can be held accountable. \\n\\n Security Council Resolution 2388 (2017) on trafficking in persons in armed conflict \\n This resolution recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons in areas affected by armed conflict and post- conflict situations can be for the purpose of various forms of exploitation\u201d, including sexual exploitation and the recruitment of child soldiers. The resolution underlines the importance of providing \u201cappropriate care, assistance and services for their physical, psychological and social recovery, rehabilitation and reintegration, in full respect of their human rights\u201d. The resolution also recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons entails the violation or abuse of human rights\u201d and underscores \u201cthat certain acts or offences associated with trafficking in persons in the context of armed conflict may constitute war crimes\u201d, and it notes States\u2019 responsibility to \u201cprosecute those responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes as well as other crimes\u201d. The resolution calls for the \u201ctraining of relevant personnel of special political and peacekeeping missions\u201d. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2462 (2019) on the financing of terrorism through illicit activities and sanctions lists \\n This resolution reaffirms the Security Council\u2019s decision in its resolution 1373 (2001) that all States shall prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts, including through organized criminal activity, and shall refrain from providing support to those involved in them. Furthermore, the resolution urges all States to participate actively in implementing and updating the ISIL (Da\u2019esh) and Al-Qaida Sanctions List and to consider including, when submitting new listing requests, individuals and entities involved in the financing of terrorism. \\n\\n Security Council Resolution 2482 (2019) on threats to international peace and security caused by international terrorism and organized crime \\n This resolution underlines that organized crime, along with terrorism and violent extremism, whether domestic or transnational, \u201cmay exacerbate conflicts in affected regions, and may contribute to undermining affected States, specifically their security, stability, governance, social and economic development\u201d and notes that organized criminal groups \u201ccan, in some cases and in some regions, complicate conflict prevention and resolution efforts\u201d. The resolution also notes the impact of the illicit drug trade, trafficking in persons and arms trafficking, and their links to corruption in furthering the financing of terrorism and fuelling conflict. ", + "Paragraph": "Security Council Resolutions \n The United Nations Security Council has increasingly recognized the role that organized crime and illicit markets play in sustaining and fuelling contemporary conflicts. Since the UNTOC was adopted in 2000, the UN Security Council has passed hundreds of resolutions on organized crime in specific countries, missions or regions. \n\n Security Council resolution 2220 (2015) on small arms \n The Council emphasizes that the illicit trafficking in small arms and light weapons can aid terrorism and illegal armed groups and facilitate increasing levels of transnational organized crime, and underscores that such illicit trafficking could harm civilians, including women and children, create instability and long-term governance challenges, and complicate conflict resolution. \n\n Security Council resolution 2331 (2016) on trafficking in persons in conflict situations, including linkages with the activities of armed groups, terrorism and sexual violence in conflict \n The Security Council recognizes the connection between trafficking in persons, sexual violence, terrorism and other transnational organized criminal activities that can prolong and exacerbate conflict and instability or intensify its impact on civilian populations. The Council condemns all acts of trafficking, particularly the sale or trade in persons undertaken by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as Da\u2019esh), and recognizes the importance of collecting and preserving evidence relating to such acts to ensure that those responsible can be held accountable. \n\n Security Council Resolution 2388 (2017) on trafficking in persons in armed conflict \n This resolution recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons in areas affected by armed conflict and post- conflict situations can be for the purpose of various forms of exploitation\u201d, including sexual exploitation and the recruitment of child soldiers. The resolution underlines the importance of providing \u201cappropriate care, assistance and services for their physical, psychological and social recovery, rehabilitation and reintegration, in full respect of their human rights\u201d. The resolution also recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons entails the violation or abuse of human rights\u201d and underscores \u201cthat certain acts or offences associated with trafficking in persons in the context of armed conflict may constitute war crimes\u201d, and it notes States\u2019 responsibility to \u201cprosecute those responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes as well as other crimes\u201d. The resolution calls for the \u201ctraining of relevant personnel of special political and peacekeeping missions\u201d. \n\n Security Council resolution 2462 (2019) on the financing of terrorism through illicit activities and sanctions lists \n This resolution reaffirms the Security Council\u2019s decision in its resolution 1373 (2001) that all States shall prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts, including through organized criminal activity, and shall refrain from providing support to those involved in them. Furthermore, the resolution urges all States to participate actively in implementing and updating the ISIL (Da\u2019esh) and Al-Qaida Sanctions List and to consider including, when submitting new listing requests, individuals and entities involved in the financing of terrorism. \n\n Security Council Resolution 2482 (2019) on threats to international peace and security caused by international terrorism and organized crime \n This resolution underlines that organized crime, along with terrorism and violent extremism, whether domestic or transnational, \u201cmay exacerbate conflicts in affected regions, and may contribute to undermining affected States, specifically their security, stability, governance, social and economic development\u201d and notes that organized criminal groups \u201ccan, in some cases and in some regions, complicate conflict prevention and resolution efforts\u201d. The resolution also notes the impact of the illicit drug trade, trafficking in persons and arms trafficking, and their links to corruption in furthering the financing of terrorism and fuelling conflict. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230178,14 +230178,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Security Council resolution 2331 (2016) on trafficking in persons in conflict situations, including linkages with the activities of armed groups, terrorism and sexual violence in conflict \\n The Security Council recognizes the connection between trafficking in persons, sexual violence, terrorism and other transnational organized criminal activities that can prolong and exacerbate conflict and instability or intensify its impact on civilian populations.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Security Council resolution 2331 (2016) on trafficking in persons in conflict situations, including linkages with the activities of armed groups, terrorism and sexual violence in conflict \n The Security Council recognizes the connection between trafficking in persons, sexual violence, terrorism and other transnational organized criminal activities that can prolong and exacerbate conflict and instability or intensify its impact on civilian populations.", "newParagraph": "security council resolution n united nation security council increasingly recognized role organized crime illicit market play sustaining fuelling contemporary conflict since untoc adopted 2000 un security council passed hundred resolution organized crime specific country mission region nn security council resolution 2220 2015 small arm n council emphasizes illicit trafficking small arm light weapon aid terrorism illegal armed group facilitate increasing level transnational organized crime underscore illicit trafficking could harm civilian including woman child create instability longterm governance challenge complicate conflict resolution nn security council resolution 2331 2016 trafficking person conflict situation including linkage activity armed group terrorism sexual violence conflict n security council recognizes connection trafficking person sexual violence terrorism transnational organized criminal activity prolong exacerbate conflict instability intensify impact civilian population council condemns act trafficking particularly sale trade person undertaken islamic state iraq levant isil also known da esh recognizes importance collecting preserving evidence relating act ensure responsible held accountable nn security council resolution 2388 2017 trafficking person armed conflict n resolution recognizes trafficking person area affected armed conflict post conflict situation purpose various form exploitation including sexual exploitation recruitment child soldier resolution underline importance providing appropriate care assistance service physical psychological social recovery rehabilitation reintegration full respect human right resolution also recognizes trafficking person entail violation abuse human right underscore certain act offence associated trafficking person context armed conflict may constitute war crime note state responsibility prosecute responsible genocide crime humanity war crime well crime resolution call training relevant personnel special political peacekeeping mission nn security council resolution 2462 2019 financing terrorism illicit activity sanction list n resolution reaffirms security council decision resolution 1373 2001 state shall prevent suppress financing terrorist act including organized criminal activity shall refrain providing support involved furthermore resolution urge state participate actively implementing updating isil da esh alqaida sanction list consider including submitting new listing request individual entity involved financing terrorism nn security council resolution 2482 2019 threat international peace security caused international terrorism organized crime n resolution underline organized crime along terrorism violent extremism whether domestic transnational may exacerbate conflict affected region may contribute undermining affected state specifically security stability governance social economic development note organized criminal group case region complicate conflict prevention resolution effort resolution also note impact illicit drug trade trafficking person arm trafficking link corruption furthering financing terrorism fuelling conflict ", "ProcessedSent": "nn security council resolution 2331 2016 trafficking person conflict situation including linkage activity armed group terrorism sexual violence conflict n security council recognizes connection trafficking person sexual violence terrorism transnational organized criminal activity prolong exacerbate conflict instability intensify impact civilian population", "SentID": 12787 }, { "ParagraphID": 3483, - "Paragraph": "Security Council Resolutions \\n The United Nations Security Council has increasingly recognized the role that organized crime and illicit markets play in sustaining and fuelling contemporary conflicts. Since the UNTOC was adopted in 2000, the UN Security Council has passed hundreds of resolutions on organized crime in specific countries, missions or regions. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2220 (2015) on small arms \\n The Council emphasizes that the illicit trafficking in small arms and light weapons can aid terrorism and illegal armed groups and facilitate increasing levels of transnational organized crime, and underscores that such illicit trafficking could harm civilians, including women and children, create instability and long-term governance challenges, and complicate conflict resolution. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2331 (2016) on trafficking in persons in conflict situations, including linkages with the activities of armed groups, terrorism and sexual violence in conflict \\n The Security Council recognizes the connection between trafficking in persons, sexual violence, terrorism and other transnational organized criminal activities that can prolong and exacerbate conflict and instability or intensify its impact on civilian populations. The Council condemns all acts of trafficking, particularly the sale or trade in persons undertaken by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as Da\u2019esh), and recognizes the importance of collecting and preserving evidence relating to such acts to ensure that those responsible can be held accountable. \\n\\n Security Council Resolution 2388 (2017) on trafficking in persons in armed conflict \\n This resolution recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons in areas affected by armed conflict and post- conflict situations can be for the purpose of various forms of exploitation\u201d, including sexual exploitation and the recruitment of child soldiers. The resolution underlines the importance of providing \u201cappropriate care, assistance and services for their physical, psychological and social recovery, rehabilitation and reintegration, in full respect of their human rights\u201d. The resolution also recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons entails the violation or abuse of human rights\u201d and underscores \u201cthat certain acts or offences associated with trafficking in persons in the context of armed conflict may constitute war crimes\u201d, and it notes States\u2019 responsibility to \u201cprosecute those responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes as well as other crimes\u201d. The resolution calls for the \u201ctraining of relevant personnel of special political and peacekeeping missions\u201d. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2462 (2019) on the financing of terrorism through illicit activities and sanctions lists \\n This resolution reaffirms the Security Council\u2019s decision in its resolution 1373 (2001) that all States shall prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts, including through organized criminal activity, and shall refrain from providing support to those involved in them. Furthermore, the resolution urges all States to participate actively in implementing and updating the ISIL (Da\u2019esh) and Al-Qaida Sanctions List and to consider including, when submitting new listing requests, individuals and entities involved in the financing of terrorism. \\n\\n Security Council Resolution 2482 (2019) on threats to international peace and security caused by international terrorism and organized crime \\n This resolution underlines that organized crime, along with terrorism and violent extremism, whether domestic or transnational, \u201cmay exacerbate conflicts in affected regions, and may contribute to undermining affected States, specifically their security, stability, governance, social and economic development\u201d and notes that organized criminal groups \u201ccan, in some cases and in some regions, complicate conflict prevention and resolution efforts\u201d. The resolution also notes the impact of the illicit drug trade, trafficking in persons and arms trafficking, and their links to corruption in furthering the financing of terrorism and fuelling conflict. ", + "Paragraph": "Security Council Resolutions \n The United Nations Security Council has increasingly recognized the role that organized crime and illicit markets play in sustaining and fuelling contemporary conflicts. Since the UNTOC was adopted in 2000, the UN Security Council has passed hundreds of resolutions on organized crime in specific countries, missions or regions. \n\n Security Council resolution 2220 (2015) on small arms \n The Council emphasizes that the illicit trafficking in small arms and light weapons can aid terrorism and illegal armed groups and facilitate increasing levels of transnational organized crime, and underscores that such illicit trafficking could harm civilians, including women and children, create instability and long-term governance challenges, and complicate conflict resolution. \n\n Security Council resolution 2331 (2016) on trafficking in persons in conflict situations, including linkages with the activities of armed groups, terrorism and sexual violence in conflict \n The Security Council recognizes the connection between trafficking in persons, sexual violence, terrorism and other transnational organized criminal activities that can prolong and exacerbate conflict and instability or intensify its impact on civilian populations. The Council condemns all acts of trafficking, particularly the sale or trade in persons undertaken by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as Da\u2019esh), and recognizes the importance of collecting and preserving evidence relating to such acts to ensure that those responsible can be held accountable. \n\n Security Council Resolution 2388 (2017) on trafficking in persons in armed conflict \n This resolution recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons in areas affected by armed conflict and post- conflict situations can be for the purpose of various forms of exploitation\u201d, including sexual exploitation and the recruitment of child soldiers. The resolution underlines the importance of providing \u201cappropriate care, assistance and services for their physical, psychological and social recovery, rehabilitation and reintegration, in full respect of their human rights\u201d. The resolution also recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons entails the violation or abuse of human rights\u201d and underscores \u201cthat certain acts or offences associated with trafficking in persons in the context of armed conflict may constitute war crimes\u201d, and it notes States\u2019 responsibility to \u201cprosecute those responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes as well as other crimes\u201d. The resolution calls for the \u201ctraining of relevant personnel of special political and peacekeeping missions\u201d. \n\n Security Council resolution 2462 (2019) on the financing of terrorism through illicit activities and sanctions lists \n This resolution reaffirms the Security Council\u2019s decision in its resolution 1373 (2001) that all States shall prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts, including through organized criminal activity, and shall refrain from providing support to those involved in them. Furthermore, the resolution urges all States to participate actively in implementing and updating the ISIL (Da\u2019esh) and Al-Qaida Sanctions List and to consider including, when submitting new listing requests, individuals and entities involved in the financing of terrorism. \n\n Security Council Resolution 2482 (2019) on threats to international peace and security caused by international terrorism and organized crime \n This resolution underlines that organized crime, along with terrorism and violent extremism, whether domestic or transnational, \u201cmay exacerbate conflicts in affected regions, and may contribute to undermining affected States, specifically their security, stability, governance, social and economic development\u201d and notes that organized criminal groups \u201ccan, in some cases and in some regions, complicate conflict prevention and resolution efforts\u201d. The resolution also notes the impact of the illicit drug trade, trafficking in persons and arms trafficking, and their links to corruption in furthering the financing of terrorism and fuelling conflict. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230203,7 +230203,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3483, - "Paragraph": "Security Council Resolutions \\n The United Nations Security Council has increasingly recognized the role that organized crime and illicit markets play in sustaining and fuelling contemporary conflicts. Since the UNTOC was adopted in 2000, the UN Security Council has passed hundreds of resolutions on organized crime in specific countries, missions or regions. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2220 (2015) on small arms \\n The Council emphasizes that the illicit trafficking in small arms and light weapons can aid terrorism and illegal armed groups and facilitate increasing levels of transnational organized crime, and underscores that such illicit trafficking could harm civilians, including women and children, create instability and long-term governance challenges, and complicate conflict resolution. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2331 (2016) on trafficking in persons in conflict situations, including linkages with the activities of armed groups, terrorism and sexual violence in conflict \\n The Security Council recognizes the connection between trafficking in persons, sexual violence, terrorism and other transnational organized criminal activities that can prolong and exacerbate conflict and instability or intensify its impact on civilian populations. The Council condemns all acts of trafficking, particularly the sale or trade in persons undertaken by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as Da\u2019esh), and recognizes the importance of collecting and preserving evidence relating to such acts to ensure that those responsible can be held accountable. \\n\\n Security Council Resolution 2388 (2017) on trafficking in persons in armed conflict \\n This resolution recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons in areas affected by armed conflict and post- conflict situations can be for the purpose of various forms of exploitation\u201d, including sexual exploitation and the recruitment of child soldiers. The resolution underlines the importance of providing \u201cappropriate care, assistance and services for their physical, psychological and social recovery, rehabilitation and reintegration, in full respect of their human rights\u201d. The resolution also recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons entails the violation or abuse of human rights\u201d and underscores \u201cthat certain acts or offences associated with trafficking in persons in the context of armed conflict may constitute war crimes\u201d, and it notes States\u2019 responsibility to \u201cprosecute those responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes as well as other crimes\u201d. The resolution calls for the \u201ctraining of relevant personnel of special political and peacekeeping missions\u201d. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2462 (2019) on the financing of terrorism through illicit activities and sanctions lists \\n This resolution reaffirms the Security Council\u2019s decision in its resolution 1373 (2001) that all States shall prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts, including through organized criminal activity, and shall refrain from providing support to those involved in them. Furthermore, the resolution urges all States to participate actively in implementing and updating the ISIL (Da\u2019esh) and Al-Qaida Sanctions List and to consider including, when submitting new listing requests, individuals and entities involved in the financing of terrorism. \\n\\n Security Council Resolution 2482 (2019) on threats to international peace and security caused by international terrorism and organized crime \\n This resolution underlines that organized crime, along with terrorism and violent extremism, whether domestic or transnational, \u201cmay exacerbate conflicts in affected regions, and may contribute to undermining affected States, specifically their security, stability, governance, social and economic development\u201d and notes that organized criminal groups \u201ccan, in some cases and in some regions, complicate conflict prevention and resolution efforts\u201d. The resolution also notes the impact of the illicit drug trade, trafficking in persons and arms trafficking, and their links to corruption in furthering the financing of terrorism and fuelling conflict. ", + "Paragraph": "Security Council Resolutions \n The United Nations Security Council has increasingly recognized the role that organized crime and illicit markets play in sustaining and fuelling contemporary conflicts. Since the UNTOC was adopted in 2000, the UN Security Council has passed hundreds of resolutions on organized crime in specific countries, missions or regions. \n\n Security Council resolution 2220 (2015) on small arms \n The Council emphasizes that the illicit trafficking in small arms and light weapons can aid terrorism and illegal armed groups and facilitate increasing levels of transnational organized crime, and underscores that such illicit trafficking could harm civilians, including women and children, create instability and long-term governance challenges, and complicate conflict resolution. \n\n Security Council resolution 2331 (2016) on trafficking in persons in conflict situations, including linkages with the activities of armed groups, terrorism and sexual violence in conflict \n The Security Council recognizes the connection between trafficking in persons, sexual violence, terrorism and other transnational organized criminal activities that can prolong and exacerbate conflict and instability or intensify its impact on civilian populations. The Council condemns all acts of trafficking, particularly the sale or trade in persons undertaken by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as Da\u2019esh), and recognizes the importance of collecting and preserving evidence relating to such acts to ensure that those responsible can be held accountable. \n\n Security Council Resolution 2388 (2017) on trafficking in persons in armed conflict \n This resolution recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons in areas affected by armed conflict and post- conflict situations can be for the purpose of various forms of exploitation\u201d, including sexual exploitation and the recruitment of child soldiers. The resolution underlines the importance of providing \u201cappropriate care, assistance and services for their physical, psychological and social recovery, rehabilitation and reintegration, in full respect of their human rights\u201d. The resolution also recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons entails the violation or abuse of human rights\u201d and underscores \u201cthat certain acts or offences associated with trafficking in persons in the context of armed conflict may constitute war crimes\u201d, and it notes States\u2019 responsibility to \u201cprosecute those responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes as well as other crimes\u201d. The resolution calls for the \u201ctraining of relevant personnel of special political and peacekeeping missions\u201d. \n\n Security Council resolution 2462 (2019) on the financing of terrorism through illicit activities and sanctions lists \n This resolution reaffirms the Security Council\u2019s decision in its resolution 1373 (2001) that all States shall prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts, including through organized criminal activity, and shall refrain from providing support to those involved in them. Furthermore, the resolution urges all States to participate actively in implementing and updating the ISIL (Da\u2019esh) and Al-Qaida Sanctions List and to consider including, when submitting new listing requests, individuals and entities involved in the financing of terrorism. \n\n Security Council Resolution 2482 (2019) on threats to international peace and security caused by international terrorism and organized crime \n This resolution underlines that organized crime, along with terrorism and violent extremism, whether domestic or transnational, \u201cmay exacerbate conflicts in affected regions, and may contribute to undermining affected States, specifically their security, stability, governance, social and economic development\u201d and notes that organized criminal groups \u201ccan, in some cases and in some regions, complicate conflict prevention and resolution efforts\u201d. The resolution also notes the impact of the illicit drug trade, trafficking in persons and arms trafficking, and their links to corruption in furthering the financing of terrorism and fuelling conflict. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230214,14 +230214,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Security Council Resolution 2388 (2017) on trafficking in persons in armed conflict \\n This resolution recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons in areas affected by armed conflict and post- conflict situations can be for the purpose of various forms of exploitation\u201d, including sexual exploitation and the recruitment of child soldiers.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Security Council Resolution 2388 (2017) on trafficking in persons in armed conflict \n This resolution recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons in areas affected by armed conflict and post- conflict situations can be for the purpose of various forms of exploitation\u201d, including sexual exploitation and the recruitment of child soldiers.", "newParagraph": "security council resolution n united nation security council increasingly recognized role organized crime illicit market play sustaining fuelling contemporary conflict since untoc adopted 2000 un security council passed hundred resolution organized crime specific country mission region nn security council resolution 2220 2015 small arm n council emphasizes illicit trafficking small arm light weapon aid terrorism illegal armed group facilitate increasing level transnational organized crime underscore illicit trafficking could harm civilian including woman child create instability longterm governance challenge complicate conflict resolution nn security council resolution 2331 2016 trafficking person conflict situation including linkage activity armed group terrorism sexual violence conflict n security council recognizes connection trafficking person sexual violence terrorism transnational organized criminal activity prolong exacerbate conflict instability intensify impact civilian population council condemns act trafficking particularly sale trade person undertaken islamic state iraq levant isil also known da esh recognizes importance collecting preserving evidence relating act ensure responsible held accountable nn security council resolution 2388 2017 trafficking person armed conflict n resolution recognizes trafficking person area affected armed conflict post conflict situation purpose various form exploitation including sexual exploitation recruitment child soldier resolution underline importance providing appropriate care assistance service physical psychological social recovery rehabilitation reintegration full respect human right resolution also recognizes trafficking person entail violation abuse human right underscore certain act offence associated trafficking person context armed conflict may constitute war crime note state responsibility prosecute responsible genocide crime humanity war crime well crime resolution call training relevant personnel special political peacekeeping mission nn security council resolution 2462 2019 financing terrorism illicit activity sanction list n resolution reaffirms security council decision resolution 1373 2001 state shall prevent suppress financing terrorist act including organized criminal activity shall refrain providing support involved furthermore resolution urge state participate actively implementing updating isil da esh alqaida sanction list consider including submitting new listing request individual entity involved financing terrorism nn security council resolution 2482 2019 threat international peace security caused international terrorism organized crime n resolution underline organized crime along terrorism violent extremism whether domestic transnational may exacerbate conflict affected region may contribute undermining affected state specifically security stability governance social economic development note organized criminal group case region complicate conflict prevention resolution effort resolution also note impact illicit drug trade trafficking person arm trafficking link corruption furthering financing terrorism fuelling conflict ", "ProcessedSent": "nn security council resolution 2388 2017 trafficking person armed conflict n resolution recognizes trafficking person area affected armed conflict post conflict situation purpose various form exploitation including sexual exploitation recruitment child soldier", "SentID": 12789 }, { "ParagraphID": 3483, - "Paragraph": "Security Council Resolutions \\n The United Nations Security Council has increasingly recognized the role that organized crime and illicit markets play in sustaining and fuelling contemporary conflicts. Since the UNTOC was adopted in 2000, the UN Security Council has passed hundreds of resolutions on organized crime in specific countries, missions or regions. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2220 (2015) on small arms \\n The Council emphasizes that the illicit trafficking in small arms and light weapons can aid terrorism and illegal armed groups and facilitate increasing levels of transnational organized crime, and underscores that such illicit trafficking could harm civilians, including women and children, create instability and long-term governance challenges, and complicate conflict resolution. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2331 (2016) on trafficking in persons in conflict situations, including linkages with the activities of armed groups, terrorism and sexual violence in conflict \\n The Security Council recognizes the connection between trafficking in persons, sexual violence, terrorism and other transnational organized criminal activities that can prolong and exacerbate conflict and instability or intensify its impact on civilian populations. The Council condemns all acts of trafficking, particularly the sale or trade in persons undertaken by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as Da\u2019esh), and recognizes the importance of collecting and preserving evidence relating to such acts to ensure that those responsible can be held accountable. \\n\\n Security Council Resolution 2388 (2017) on trafficking in persons in armed conflict \\n This resolution recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons in areas affected by armed conflict and post- conflict situations can be for the purpose of various forms of exploitation\u201d, including sexual exploitation and the recruitment of child soldiers. The resolution underlines the importance of providing \u201cappropriate care, assistance and services for their physical, psychological and social recovery, rehabilitation and reintegration, in full respect of their human rights\u201d. The resolution also recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons entails the violation or abuse of human rights\u201d and underscores \u201cthat certain acts or offences associated with trafficking in persons in the context of armed conflict may constitute war crimes\u201d, and it notes States\u2019 responsibility to \u201cprosecute those responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes as well as other crimes\u201d. The resolution calls for the \u201ctraining of relevant personnel of special political and peacekeeping missions\u201d. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2462 (2019) on the financing of terrorism through illicit activities and sanctions lists \\n This resolution reaffirms the Security Council\u2019s decision in its resolution 1373 (2001) that all States shall prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts, including through organized criminal activity, and shall refrain from providing support to those involved in them. Furthermore, the resolution urges all States to participate actively in implementing and updating the ISIL (Da\u2019esh) and Al-Qaida Sanctions List and to consider including, when submitting new listing requests, individuals and entities involved in the financing of terrorism. \\n\\n Security Council Resolution 2482 (2019) on threats to international peace and security caused by international terrorism and organized crime \\n This resolution underlines that organized crime, along with terrorism and violent extremism, whether domestic or transnational, \u201cmay exacerbate conflicts in affected regions, and may contribute to undermining affected States, specifically their security, stability, governance, social and economic development\u201d and notes that organized criminal groups \u201ccan, in some cases and in some regions, complicate conflict prevention and resolution efforts\u201d. The resolution also notes the impact of the illicit drug trade, trafficking in persons and arms trafficking, and their links to corruption in furthering the financing of terrorism and fuelling conflict. ", + "Paragraph": "Security Council Resolutions \n The United Nations Security Council has increasingly recognized the role that organized crime and illicit markets play in sustaining and fuelling contemporary conflicts. Since the UNTOC was adopted in 2000, the UN Security Council has passed hundreds of resolutions on organized crime in specific countries, missions or regions. \n\n Security Council resolution 2220 (2015) on small arms \n The Council emphasizes that the illicit trafficking in small arms and light weapons can aid terrorism and illegal armed groups and facilitate increasing levels of transnational organized crime, and underscores that such illicit trafficking could harm civilians, including women and children, create instability and long-term governance challenges, and complicate conflict resolution. \n\n Security Council resolution 2331 (2016) on trafficking in persons in conflict situations, including linkages with the activities of armed groups, terrorism and sexual violence in conflict \n The Security Council recognizes the connection between trafficking in persons, sexual violence, terrorism and other transnational organized criminal activities that can prolong and exacerbate conflict and instability or intensify its impact on civilian populations. The Council condemns all acts of trafficking, particularly the sale or trade in persons undertaken by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as Da\u2019esh), and recognizes the importance of collecting and preserving evidence relating to such acts to ensure that those responsible can be held accountable. \n\n Security Council Resolution 2388 (2017) on trafficking in persons in armed conflict \n This resolution recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons in areas affected by armed conflict and post- conflict situations can be for the purpose of various forms of exploitation\u201d, including sexual exploitation and the recruitment of child soldiers. The resolution underlines the importance of providing \u201cappropriate care, assistance and services for their physical, psychological and social recovery, rehabilitation and reintegration, in full respect of their human rights\u201d. The resolution also recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons entails the violation or abuse of human rights\u201d and underscores \u201cthat certain acts or offences associated with trafficking in persons in the context of armed conflict may constitute war crimes\u201d, and it notes States\u2019 responsibility to \u201cprosecute those responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes as well as other crimes\u201d. The resolution calls for the \u201ctraining of relevant personnel of special political and peacekeeping missions\u201d. \n\n Security Council resolution 2462 (2019) on the financing of terrorism through illicit activities and sanctions lists \n This resolution reaffirms the Security Council\u2019s decision in its resolution 1373 (2001) that all States shall prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts, including through organized criminal activity, and shall refrain from providing support to those involved in them. Furthermore, the resolution urges all States to participate actively in implementing and updating the ISIL (Da\u2019esh) and Al-Qaida Sanctions List and to consider including, when submitting new listing requests, individuals and entities involved in the financing of terrorism. \n\n Security Council Resolution 2482 (2019) on threats to international peace and security caused by international terrorism and organized crime \n This resolution underlines that organized crime, along with terrorism and violent extremism, whether domestic or transnational, \u201cmay exacerbate conflicts in affected regions, and may contribute to undermining affected States, specifically their security, stability, governance, social and economic development\u201d and notes that organized criminal groups \u201ccan, in some cases and in some regions, complicate conflict prevention and resolution efforts\u201d. The resolution also notes the impact of the illicit drug trade, trafficking in persons and arms trafficking, and their links to corruption in furthering the financing of terrorism and fuelling conflict. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230239,7 +230239,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3483, - "Paragraph": "Security Council Resolutions \\n The United Nations Security Council has increasingly recognized the role that organized crime and illicit markets play in sustaining and fuelling contemporary conflicts. Since the UNTOC was adopted in 2000, the UN Security Council has passed hundreds of resolutions on organized crime in specific countries, missions or regions. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2220 (2015) on small arms \\n The Council emphasizes that the illicit trafficking in small arms and light weapons can aid terrorism and illegal armed groups and facilitate increasing levels of transnational organized crime, and underscores that such illicit trafficking could harm civilians, including women and children, create instability and long-term governance challenges, and complicate conflict resolution. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2331 (2016) on trafficking in persons in conflict situations, including linkages with the activities of armed groups, terrorism and sexual violence in conflict \\n The Security Council recognizes the connection between trafficking in persons, sexual violence, terrorism and other transnational organized criminal activities that can prolong and exacerbate conflict and instability or intensify its impact on civilian populations. The Council condemns all acts of trafficking, particularly the sale or trade in persons undertaken by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as Da\u2019esh), and recognizes the importance of collecting and preserving evidence relating to such acts to ensure that those responsible can be held accountable. \\n\\n Security Council Resolution 2388 (2017) on trafficking in persons in armed conflict \\n This resolution recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons in areas affected by armed conflict and post- conflict situations can be for the purpose of various forms of exploitation\u201d, including sexual exploitation and the recruitment of child soldiers. The resolution underlines the importance of providing \u201cappropriate care, assistance and services for their physical, psychological and social recovery, rehabilitation and reintegration, in full respect of their human rights\u201d. The resolution also recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons entails the violation or abuse of human rights\u201d and underscores \u201cthat certain acts or offences associated with trafficking in persons in the context of armed conflict may constitute war crimes\u201d, and it notes States\u2019 responsibility to \u201cprosecute those responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes as well as other crimes\u201d. The resolution calls for the \u201ctraining of relevant personnel of special political and peacekeeping missions\u201d. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2462 (2019) on the financing of terrorism through illicit activities and sanctions lists \\n This resolution reaffirms the Security Council\u2019s decision in its resolution 1373 (2001) that all States shall prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts, including through organized criminal activity, and shall refrain from providing support to those involved in them. Furthermore, the resolution urges all States to participate actively in implementing and updating the ISIL (Da\u2019esh) and Al-Qaida Sanctions List and to consider including, when submitting new listing requests, individuals and entities involved in the financing of terrorism. \\n\\n Security Council Resolution 2482 (2019) on threats to international peace and security caused by international terrorism and organized crime \\n This resolution underlines that organized crime, along with terrorism and violent extremism, whether domestic or transnational, \u201cmay exacerbate conflicts in affected regions, and may contribute to undermining affected States, specifically their security, stability, governance, social and economic development\u201d and notes that organized criminal groups \u201ccan, in some cases and in some regions, complicate conflict prevention and resolution efforts\u201d. The resolution also notes the impact of the illicit drug trade, trafficking in persons and arms trafficking, and their links to corruption in furthering the financing of terrorism and fuelling conflict. ", + "Paragraph": "Security Council Resolutions \n The United Nations Security Council has increasingly recognized the role that organized crime and illicit markets play in sustaining and fuelling contemporary conflicts. Since the UNTOC was adopted in 2000, the UN Security Council has passed hundreds of resolutions on organized crime in specific countries, missions or regions. \n\n Security Council resolution 2220 (2015) on small arms \n The Council emphasizes that the illicit trafficking in small arms and light weapons can aid terrorism and illegal armed groups and facilitate increasing levels of transnational organized crime, and underscores that such illicit trafficking could harm civilians, including women and children, create instability and long-term governance challenges, and complicate conflict resolution. \n\n Security Council resolution 2331 (2016) on trafficking in persons in conflict situations, including linkages with the activities of armed groups, terrorism and sexual violence in conflict \n The Security Council recognizes the connection between trafficking in persons, sexual violence, terrorism and other transnational organized criminal activities that can prolong and exacerbate conflict and instability or intensify its impact on civilian populations. The Council condemns all acts of trafficking, particularly the sale or trade in persons undertaken by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as Da\u2019esh), and recognizes the importance of collecting and preserving evidence relating to such acts to ensure that those responsible can be held accountable. \n\n Security Council Resolution 2388 (2017) on trafficking in persons in armed conflict \n This resolution recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons in areas affected by armed conflict and post- conflict situations can be for the purpose of various forms of exploitation\u201d, including sexual exploitation and the recruitment of child soldiers. The resolution underlines the importance of providing \u201cappropriate care, assistance and services for their physical, psychological and social recovery, rehabilitation and reintegration, in full respect of their human rights\u201d. The resolution also recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons entails the violation or abuse of human rights\u201d and underscores \u201cthat certain acts or offences associated with trafficking in persons in the context of armed conflict may constitute war crimes\u201d, and it notes States\u2019 responsibility to \u201cprosecute those responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes as well as other crimes\u201d. The resolution calls for the \u201ctraining of relevant personnel of special political and peacekeeping missions\u201d. \n\n Security Council resolution 2462 (2019) on the financing of terrorism through illicit activities and sanctions lists \n This resolution reaffirms the Security Council\u2019s decision in its resolution 1373 (2001) that all States shall prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts, including through organized criminal activity, and shall refrain from providing support to those involved in them. Furthermore, the resolution urges all States to participate actively in implementing and updating the ISIL (Da\u2019esh) and Al-Qaida Sanctions List and to consider including, when submitting new listing requests, individuals and entities involved in the financing of terrorism. \n\n Security Council Resolution 2482 (2019) on threats to international peace and security caused by international terrorism and organized crime \n This resolution underlines that organized crime, along with terrorism and violent extremism, whether domestic or transnational, \u201cmay exacerbate conflicts in affected regions, and may contribute to undermining affected States, specifically their security, stability, governance, social and economic development\u201d and notes that organized criminal groups \u201ccan, in some cases and in some regions, complicate conflict prevention and resolution efforts\u201d. The resolution also notes the impact of the illicit drug trade, trafficking in persons and arms trafficking, and their links to corruption in furthering the financing of terrorism and fuelling conflict. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230257,7 +230257,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3483, - "Paragraph": "Security Council Resolutions \\n The United Nations Security Council has increasingly recognized the role that organized crime and illicit markets play in sustaining and fuelling contemporary conflicts. Since the UNTOC was adopted in 2000, the UN Security Council has passed hundreds of resolutions on organized crime in specific countries, missions or regions. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2220 (2015) on small arms \\n The Council emphasizes that the illicit trafficking in small arms and light weapons can aid terrorism and illegal armed groups and facilitate increasing levels of transnational organized crime, and underscores that such illicit trafficking could harm civilians, including women and children, create instability and long-term governance challenges, and complicate conflict resolution. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2331 (2016) on trafficking in persons in conflict situations, including linkages with the activities of armed groups, terrorism and sexual violence in conflict \\n The Security Council recognizes the connection between trafficking in persons, sexual violence, terrorism and other transnational organized criminal activities that can prolong and exacerbate conflict and instability or intensify its impact on civilian populations. The Council condemns all acts of trafficking, particularly the sale or trade in persons undertaken by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as Da\u2019esh), and recognizes the importance of collecting and preserving evidence relating to such acts to ensure that those responsible can be held accountable. \\n\\n Security Council Resolution 2388 (2017) on trafficking in persons in armed conflict \\n This resolution recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons in areas affected by armed conflict and post- conflict situations can be for the purpose of various forms of exploitation\u201d, including sexual exploitation and the recruitment of child soldiers. The resolution underlines the importance of providing \u201cappropriate care, assistance and services for their physical, psychological and social recovery, rehabilitation and reintegration, in full respect of their human rights\u201d. The resolution also recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons entails the violation or abuse of human rights\u201d and underscores \u201cthat certain acts or offences associated with trafficking in persons in the context of armed conflict may constitute war crimes\u201d, and it notes States\u2019 responsibility to \u201cprosecute those responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes as well as other crimes\u201d. The resolution calls for the \u201ctraining of relevant personnel of special political and peacekeeping missions\u201d. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2462 (2019) on the financing of terrorism through illicit activities and sanctions lists \\n This resolution reaffirms the Security Council\u2019s decision in its resolution 1373 (2001) that all States shall prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts, including through organized criminal activity, and shall refrain from providing support to those involved in them. Furthermore, the resolution urges all States to participate actively in implementing and updating the ISIL (Da\u2019esh) and Al-Qaida Sanctions List and to consider including, when submitting new listing requests, individuals and entities involved in the financing of terrorism. \\n\\n Security Council Resolution 2482 (2019) on threats to international peace and security caused by international terrorism and organized crime \\n This resolution underlines that organized crime, along with terrorism and violent extremism, whether domestic or transnational, \u201cmay exacerbate conflicts in affected regions, and may contribute to undermining affected States, specifically their security, stability, governance, social and economic development\u201d and notes that organized criminal groups \u201ccan, in some cases and in some regions, complicate conflict prevention and resolution efforts\u201d. The resolution also notes the impact of the illicit drug trade, trafficking in persons and arms trafficking, and their links to corruption in furthering the financing of terrorism and fuelling conflict. ", + "Paragraph": "Security Council Resolutions \n The United Nations Security Council has increasingly recognized the role that organized crime and illicit markets play in sustaining and fuelling contemporary conflicts. Since the UNTOC was adopted in 2000, the UN Security Council has passed hundreds of resolutions on organized crime in specific countries, missions or regions. \n\n Security Council resolution 2220 (2015) on small arms \n The Council emphasizes that the illicit trafficking in small arms and light weapons can aid terrorism and illegal armed groups and facilitate increasing levels of transnational organized crime, and underscores that such illicit trafficking could harm civilians, including women and children, create instability and long-term governance challenges, and complicate conflict resolution. \n\n Security Council resolution 2331 (2016) on trafficking in persons in conflict situations, including linkages with the activities of armed groups, terrorism and sexual violence in conflict \n The Security Council recognizes the connection between trafficking in persons, sexual violence, terrorism and other transnational organized criminal activities that can prolong and exacerbate conflict and instability or intensify its impact on civilian populations. The Council condemns all acts of trafficking, particularly the sale or trade in persons undertaken by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as Da\u2019esh), and recognizes the importance of collecting and preserving evidence relating to such acts to ensure that those responsible can be held accountable. \n\n Security Council Resolution 2388 (2017) on trafficking in persons in armed conflict \n This resolution recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons in areas affected by armed conflict and post- conflict situations can be for the purpose of various forms of exploitation\u201d, including sexual exploitation and the recruitment of child soldiers. The resolution underlines the importance of providing \u201cappropriate care, assistance and services for their physical, psychological and social recovery, rehabilitation and reintegration, in full respect of their human rights\u201d. The resolution also recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons entails the violation or abuse of human rights\u201d and underscores \u201cthat certain acts or offences associated with trafficking in persons in the context of armed conflict may constitute war crimes\u201d, and it notes States\u2019 responsibility to \u201cprosecute those responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes as well as other crimes\u201d. The resolution calls for the \u201ctraining of relevant personnel of special political and peacekeeping missions\u201d. \n\n Security Council resolution 2462 (2019) on the financing of terrorism through illicit activities and sanctions lists \n This resolution reaffirms the Security Council\u2019s decision in its resolution 1373 (2001) that all States shall prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts, including through organized criminal activity, and shall refrain from providing support to those involved in them. Furthermore, the resolution urges all States to participate actively in implementing and updating the ISIL (Da\u2019esh) and Al-Qaida Sanctions List and to consider including, when submitting new listing requests, individuals and entities involved in the financing of terrorism. \n\n Security Council Resolution 2482 (2019) on threats to international peace and security caused by international terrorism and organized crime \n This resolution underlines that organized crime, along with terrorism and violent extremism, whether domestic or transnational, \u201cmay exacerbate conflicts in affected regions, and may contribute to undermining affected States, specifically their security, stability, governance, social and economic development\u201d and notes that organized criminal groups \u201ccan, in some cases and in some regions, complicate conflict prevention and resolution efforts\u201d. The resolution also notes the impact of the illicit drug trade, trafficking in persons and arms trafficking, and their links to corruption in furthering the financing of terrorism and fuelling conflict. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230275,7 +230275,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3483, - "Paragraph": "Security Council Resolutions \\n The United Nations Security Council has increasingly recognized the role that organized crime and illicit markets play in sustaining and fuelling contemporary conflicts. Since the UNTOC was adopted in 2000, the UN Security Council has passed hundreds of resolutions on organized crime in specific countries, missions or regions. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2220 (2015) on small arms \\n The Council emphasizes that the illicit trafficking in small arms and light weapons can aid terrorism and illegal armed groups and facilitate increasing levels of transnational organized crime, and underscores that such illicit trafficking could harm civilians, including women and children, create instability and long-term governance challenges, and complicate conflict resolution. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2331 (2016) on trafficking in persons in conflict situations, including linkages with the activities of armed groups, terrorism and sexual violence in conflict \\n The Security Council recognizes the connection between trafficking in persons, sexual violence, terrorism and other transnational organized criminal activities that can prolong and exacerbate conflict and instability or intensify its impact on civilian populations. The Council condemns all acts of trafficking, particularly the sale or trade in persons undertaken by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as Da\u2019esh), and recognizes the importance of collecting and preserving evidence relating to such acts to ensure that those responsible can be held accountable. \\n\\n Security Council Resolution 2388 (2017) on trafficking in persons in armed conflict \\n This resolution recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons in areas affected by armed conflict and post- conflict situations can be for the purpose of various forms of exploitation\u201d, including sexual exploitation and the recruitment of child soldiers. The resolution underlines the importance of providing \u201cappropriate care, assistance and services for their physical, psychological and social recovery, rehabilitation and reintegration, in full respect of their human rights\u201d. The resolution also recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons entails the violation or abuse of human rights\u201d and underscores \u201cthat certain acts or offences associated with trafficking in persons in the context of armed conflict may constitute war crimes\u201d, and it notes States\u2019 responsibility to \u201cprosecute those responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes as well as other crimes\u201d. The resolution calls for the \u201ctraining of relevant personnel of special political and peacekeeping missions\u201d. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2462 (2019) on the financing of terrorism through illicit activities and sanctions lists \\n This resolution reaffirms the Security Council\u2019s decision in its resolution 1373 (2001) that all States shall prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts, including through organized criminal activity, and shall refrain from providing support to those involved in them. Furthermore, the resolution urges all States to participate actively in implementing and updating the ISIL (Da\u2019esh) and Al-Qaida Sanctions List and to consider including, when submitting new listing requests, individuals and entities involved in the financing of terrorism. \\n\\n Security Council Resolution 2482 (2019) on threats to international peace and security caused by international terrorism and organized crime \\n This resolution underlines that organized crime, along with terrorism and violent extremism, whether domestic or transnational, \u201cmay exacerbate conflicts in affected regions, and may contribute to undermining affected States, specifically their security, stability, governance, social and economic development\u201d and notes that organized criminal groups \u201ccan, in some cases and in some regions, complicate conflict prevention and resolution efforts\u201d. The resolution also notes the impact of the illicit drug trade, trafficking in persons and arms trafficking, and their links to corruption in furthering the financing of terrorism and fuelling conflict. ", + "Paragraph": "Security Council Resolutions \n The United Nations Security Council has increasingly recognized the role that organized crime and illicit markets play in sustaining and fuelling contemporary conflicts. Since the UNTOC was adopted in 2000, the UN Security Council has passed hundreds of resolutions on organized crime in specific countries, missions or regions. \n\n Security Council resolution 2220 (2015) on small arms \n The Council emphasizes that the illicit trafficking in small arms and light weapons can aid terrorism and illegal armed groups and facilitate increasing levels of transnational organized crime, and underscores that such illicit trafficking could harm civilians, including women and children, create instability and long-term governance challenges, and complicate conflict resolution. \n\n Security Council resolution 2331 (2016) on trafficking in persons in conflict situations, including linkages with the activities of armed groups, terrorism and sexual violence in conflict \n The Security Council recognizes the connection between trafficking in persons, sexual violence, terrorism and other transnational organized criminal activities that can prolong and exacerbate conflict and instability or intensify its impact on civilian populations. The Council condemns all acts of trafficking, particularly the sale or trade in persons undertaken by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as Da\u2019esh), and recognizes the importance of collecting and preserving evidence relating to such acts to ensure that those responsible can be held accountable. \n\n Security Council Resolution 2388 (2017) on trafficking in persons in armed conflict \n This resolution recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons in areas affected by armed conflict and post- conflict situations can be for the purpose of various forms of exploitation\u201d, including sexual exploitation and the recruitment of child soldiers. The resolution underlines the importance of providing \u201cappropriate care, assistance and services for their physical, psychological and social recovery, rehabilitation and reintegration, in full respect of their human rights\u201d. The resolution also recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons entails the violation or abuse of human rights\u201d and underscores \u201cthat certain acts or offences associated with trafficking in persons in the context of armed conflict may constitute war crimes\u201d, and it notes States\u2019 responsibility to \u201cprosecute those responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes as well as other crimes\u201d. The resolution calls for the \u201ctraining of relevant personnel of special political and peacekeeping missions\u201d. \n\n Security Council resolution 2462 (2019) on the financing of terrorism through illicit activities and sanctions lists \n This resolution reaffirms the Security Council\u2019s decision in its resolution 1373 (2001) that all States shall prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts, including through organized criminal activity, and shall refrain from providing support to those involved in them. Furthermore, the resolution urges all States to participate actively in implementing and updating the ISIL (Da\u2019esh) and Al-Qaida Sanctions List and to consider including, when submitting new listing requests, individuals and entities involved in the financing of terrorism. \n\n Security Council Resolution 2482 (2019) on threats to international peace and security caused by international terrorism and organized crime \n This resolution underlines that organized crime, along with terrorism and violent extremism, whether domestic or transnational, \u201cmay exacerbate conflicts in affected regions, and may contribute to undermining affected States, specifically their security, stability, governance, social and economic development\u201d and notes that organized criminal groups \u201ccan, in some cases and in some regions, complicate conflict prevention and resolution efforts\u201d. The resolution also notes the impact of the illicit drug trade, trafficking in persons and arms trafficking, and their links to corruption in furthering the financing of terrorism and fuelling conflict. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230286,14 +230286,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Security Council resolution 2462 (2019) on the financing of terrorism through illicit activities and sanctions lists \\n This resolution reaffirms the Security Council\u2019s decision in its resolution 1373 (2001) that all States shall prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts, including through organized criminal activity, and shall refrain from providing support to those involved in them.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Security Council resolution 2462 (2019) on the financing of terrorism through illicit activities and sanctions lists \n This resolution reaffirms the Security Council\u2019s decision in its resolution 1373 (2001) that all States shall prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts, including through organized criminal activity, and shall refrain from providing support to those involved in them.", "newParagraph": "security council resolution n united nation security council increasingly recognized role organized crime illicit market play sustaining fuelling contemporary conflict since untoc adopted 2000 un security council passed hundred resolution organized crime specific country mission region nn security council resolution 2220 2015 small arm n council emphasizes illicit trafficking small arm light weapon aid terrorism illegal armed group facilitate increasing level transnational organized crime underscore illicit trafficking could harm civilian including woman child create instability longterm governance challenge complicate conflict resolution nn security council resolution 2331 2016 trafficking person conflict situation including linkage activity armed group terrorism sexual violence conflict n security council recognizes connection trafficking person sexual violence terrorism transnational organized criminal activity prolong exacerbate conflict instability intensify impact civilian population council condemns act trafficking particularly sale trade person undertaken islamic state iraq levant isil also known da esh recognizes importance collecting preserving evidence relating act ensure responsible held accountable nn security council resolution 2388 2017 trafficking person armed conflict n resolution recognizes trafficking person area affected armed conflict post conflict situation purpose various form exploitation including sexual exploitation recruitment child soldier resolution underline importance providing appropriate care assistance service physical psychological social recovery rehabilitation reintegration full respect human right resolution also recognizes trafficking person entail violation abuse human right underscore certain act offence associated trafficking person context armed conflict may constitute war crime note state responsibility prosecute responsible genocide crime humanity war crime well crime resolution call training relevant personnel special political peacekeeping mission nn security council resolution 2462 2019 financing terrorism illicit activity sanction list n resolution reaffirms security council decision resolution 1373 2001 state shall prevent suppress financing terrorist act including organized criminal activity shall refrain providing support involved furthermore resolution urge state participate actively implementing updating isil da esh alqaida sanction list consider including submitting new listing request individual entity involved financing terrorism nn security council resolution 2482 2019 threat international peace security caused international terrorism organized crime n resolution underline organized crime along terrorism violent extremism whether domestic transnational may exacerbate conflict affected region may contribute undermining affected state specifically security stability governance social economic development note organized criminal group case region complicate conflict prevention resolution effort resolution also note impact illicit drug trade trafficking person arm trafficking link corruption furthering financing terrorism fuelling conflict ", "ProcessedSent": "nn security council resolution 2462 2019 financing terrorism illicit activity sanction list n resolution reaffirms security council decision resolution 1373 2001 state shall prevent suppress financing terrorist act including organized criminal activity shall refrain providing support involved", "SentID": 12793 }, { "ParagraphID": 3483, - "Paragraph": "Security Council Resolutions \\n The United Nations Security Council has increasingly recognized the role that organized crime and illicit markets play in sustaining and fuelling contemporary conflicts. Since the UNTOC was adopted in 2000, the UN Security Council has passed hundreds of resolutions on organized crime in specific countries, missions or regions. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2220 (2015) on small arms \\n The Council emphasizes that the illicit trafficking in small arms and light weapons can aid terrorism and illegal armed groups and facilitate increasing levels of transnational organized crime, and underscores that such illicit trafficking could harm civilians, including women and children, create instability and long-term governance challenges, and complicate conflict resolution. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2331 (2016) on trafficking in persons in conflict situations, including linkages with the activities of armed groups, terrorism and sexual violence in conflict \\n The Security Council recognizes the connection between trafficking in persons, sexual violence, terrorism and other transnational organized criminal activities that can prolong and exacerbate conflict and instability or intensify its impact on civilian populations. The Council condemns all acts of trafficking, particularly the sale or trade in persons undertaken by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as Da\u2019esh), and recognizes the importance of collecting and preserving evidence relating to such acts to ensure that those responsible can be held accountable. \\n\\n Security Council Resolution 2388 (2017) on trafficking in persons in armed conflict \\n This resolution recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons in areas affected by armed conflict and post- conflict situations can be for the purpose of various forms of exploitation\u201d, including sexual exploitation and the recruitment of child soldiers. The resolution underlines the importance of providing \u201cappropriate care, assistance and services for their physical, psychological and social recovery, rehabilitation and reintegration, in full respect of their human rights\u201d. The resolution also recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons entails the violation or abuse of human rights\u201d and underscores \u201cthat certain acts or offences associated with trafficking in persons in the context of armed conflict may constitute war crimes\u201d, and it notes States\u2019 responsibility to \u201cprosecute those responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes as well as other crimes\u201d. The resolution calls for the \u201ctraining of relevant personnel of special political and peacekeeping missions\u201d. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2462 (2019) on the financing of terrorism through illicit activities and sanctions lists \\n This resolution reaffirms the Security Council\u2019s decision in its resolution 1373 (2001) that all States shall prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts, including through organized criminal activity, and shall refrain from providing support to those involved in them. Furthermore, the resolution urges all States to participate actively in implementing and updating the ISIL (Da\u2019esh) and Al-Qaida Sanctions List and to consider including, when submitting new listing requests, individuals and entities involved in the financing of terrorism. \\n\\n Security Council Resolution 2482 (2019) on threats to international peace and security caused by international terrorism and organized crime \\n This resolution underlines that organized crime, along with terrorism and violent extremism, whether domestic or transnational, \u201cmay exacerbate conflicts in affected regions, and may contribute to undermining affected States, specifically their security, stability, governance, social and economic development\u201d and notes that organized criminal groups \u201ccan, in some cases and in some regions, complicate conflict prevention and resolution efforts\u201d. The resolution also notes the impact of the illicit drug trade, trafficking in persons and arms trafficking, and their links to corruption in furthering the financing of terrorism and fuelling conflict. ", + "Paragraph": "Security Council Resolutions \n The United Nations Security Council has increasingly recognized the role that organized crime and illicit markets play in sustaining and fuelling contemporary conflicts. Since the UNTOC was adopted in 2000, the UN Security Council has passed hundreds of resolutions on organized crime in specific countries, missions or regions. \n\n Security Council resolution 2220 (2015) on small arms \n The Council emphasizes that the illicit trafficking in small arms and light weapons can aid terrorism and illegal armed groups and facilitate increasing levels of transnational organized crime, and underscores that such illicit trafficking could harm civilians, including women and children, create instability and long-term governance challenges, and complicate conflict resolution. \n\n Security Council resolution 2331 (2016) on trafficking in persons in conflict situations, including linkages with the activities of armed groups, terrorism and sexual violence in conflict \n The Security Council recognizes the connection between trafficking in persons, sexual violence, terrorism and other transnational organized criminal activities that can prolong and exacerbate conflict and instability or intensify its impact on civilian populations. The Council condemns all acts of trafficking, particularly the sale or trade in persons undertaken by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as Da\u2019esh), and recognizes the importance of collecting and preserving evidence relating to such acts to ensure that those responsible can be held accountable. \n\n Security Council Resolution 2388 (2017) on trafficking in persons in armed conflict \n This resolution recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons in areas affected by armed conflict and post- conflict situations can be for the purpose of various forms of exploitation\u201d, including sexual exploitation and the recruitment of child soldiers. The resolution underlines the importance of providing \u201cappropriate care, assistance and services for their physical, psychological and social recovery, rehabilitation and reintegration, in full respect of their human rights\u201d. The resolution also recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons entails the violation or abuse of human rights\u201d and underscores \u201cthat certain acts or offences associated with trafficking in persons in the context of armed conflict may constitute war crimes\u201d, and it notes States\u2019 responsibility to \u201cprosecute those responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes as well as other crimes\u201d. The resolution calls for the \u201ctraining of relevant personnel of special political and peacekeeping missions\u201d. \n\n Security Council resolution 2462 (2019) on the financing of terrorism through illicit activities and sanctions lists \n This resolution reaffirms the Security Council\u2019s decision in its resolution 1373 (2001) that all States shall prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts, including through organized criminal activity, and shall refrain from providing support to those involved in them. Furthermore, the resolution urges all States to participate actively in implementing and updating the ISIL (Da\u2019esh) and Al-Qaida Sanctions List and to consider including, when submitting new listing requests, individuals and entities involved in the financing of terrorism. \n\n Security Council Resolution 2482 (2019) on threats to international peace and security caused by international terrorism and organized crime \n This resolution underlines that organized crime, along with terrorism and violent extremism, whether domestic or transnational, \u201cmay exacerbate conflicts in affected regions, and may contribute to undermining affected States, specifically their security, stability, governance, social and economic development\u201d and notes that organized criminal groups \u201ccan, in some cases and in some regions, complicate conflict prevention and resolution efforts\u201d. The resolution also notes the impact of the illicit drug trade, trafficking in persons and arms trafficking, and their links to corruption in furthering the financing of terrorism and fuelling conflict. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230311,7 +230311,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3483, - "Paragraph": "Security Council Resolutions \\n The United Nations Security Council has increasingly recognized the role that organized crime and illicit markets play in sustaining and fuelling contemporary conflicts. Since the UNTOC was adopted in 2000, the UN Security Council has passed hundreds of resolutions on organized crime in specific countries, missions or regions. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2220 (2015) on small arms \\n The Council emphasizes that the illicit trafficking in small arms and light weapons can aid terrorism and illegal armed groups and facilitate increasing levels of transnational organized crime, and underscores that such illicit trafficking could harm civilians, including women and children, create instability and long-term governance challenges, and complicate conflict resolution. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2331 (2016) on trafficking in persons in conflict situations, including linkages with the activities of armed groups, terrorism and sexual violence in conflict \\n The Security Council recognizes the connection between trafficking in persons, sexual violence, terrorism and other transnational organized criminal activities that can prolong and exacerbate conflict and instability or intensify its impact on civilian populations. The Council condemns all acts of trafficking, particularly the sale or trade in persons undertaken by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as Da\u2019esh), and recognizes the importance of collecting and preserving evidence relating to such acts to ensure that those responsible can be held accountable. \\n\\n Security Council Resolution 2388 (2017) on trafficking in persons in armed conflict \\n This resolution recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons in areas affected by armed conflict and post- conflict situations can be for the purpose of various forms of exploitation\u201d, including sexual exploitation and the recruitment of child soldiers. The resolution underlines the importance of providing \u201cappropriate care, assistance and services for their physical, psychological and social recovery, rehabilitation and reintegration, in full respect of their human rights\u201d. The resolution also recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons entails the violation or abuse of human rights\u201d and underscores \u201cthat certain acts or offences associated with trafficking in persons in the context of armed conflict may constitute war crimes\u201d, and it notes States\u2019 responsibility to \u201cprosecute those responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes as well as other crimes\u201d. The resolution calls for the \u201ctraining of relevant personnel of special political and peacekeeping missions\u201d. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2462 (2019) on the financing of terrorism through illicit activities and sanctions lists \\n This resolution reaffirms the Security Council\u2019s decision in its resolution 1373 (2001) that all States shall prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts, including through organized criminal activity, and shall refrain from providing support to those involved in them. Furthermore, the resolution urges all States to participate actively in implementing and updating the ISIL (Da\u2019esh) and Al-Qaida Sanctions List and to consider including, when submitting new listing requests, individuals and entities involved in the financing of terrorism. \\n\\n Security Council Resolution 2482 (2019) on threats to international peace and security caused by international terrorism and organized crime \\n This resolution underlines that organized crime, along with terrorism and violent extremism, whether domestic or transnational, \u201cmay exacerbate conflicts in affected regions, and may contribute to undermining affected States, specifically their security, stability, governance, social and economic development\u201d and notes that organized criminal groups \u201ccan, in some cases and in some regions, complicate conflict prevention and resolution efforts\u201d. The resolution also notes the impact of the illicit drug trade, trafficking in persons and arms trafficking, and their links to corruption in furthering the financing of terrorism and fuelling conflict. ", + "Paragraph": "Security Council Resolutions \n The United Nations Security Council has increasingly recognized the role that organized crime and illicit markets play in sustaining and fuelling contemporary conflicts. Since the UNTOC was adopted in 2000, the UN Security Council has passed hundreds of resolutions on organized crime in specific countries, missions or regions. \n\n Security Council resolution 2220 (2015) on small arms \n The Council emphasizes that the illicit trafficking in small arms and light weapons can aid terrorism and illegal armed groups and facilitate increasing levels of transnational organized crime, and underscores that such illicit trafficking could harm civilians, including women and children, create instability and long-term governance challenges, and complicate conflict resolution. \n\n Security Council resolution 2331 (2016) on trafficking in persons in conflict situations, including linkages with the activities of armed groups, terrorism and sexual violence in conflict \n The Security Council recognizes the connection between trafficking in persons, sexual violence, terrorism and other transnational organized criminal activities that can prolong and exacerbate conflict and instability or intensify its impact on civilian populations. The Council condemns all acts of trafficking, particularly the sale or trade in persons undertaken by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as Da\u2019esh), and recognizes the importance of collecting and preserving evidence relating to such acts to ensure that those responsible can be held accountable. \n\n Security Council Resolution 2388 (2017) on trafficking in persons in armed conflict \n This resolution recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons in areas affected by armed conflict and post- conflict situations can be for the purpose of various forms of exploitation\u201d, including sexual exploitation and the recruitment of child soldiers. The resolution underlines the importance of providing \u201cappropriate care, assistance and services for their physical, psychological and social recovery, rehabilitation and reintegration, in full respect of their human rights\u201d. The resolution also recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons entails the violation or abuse of human rights\u201d and underscores \u201cthat certain acts or offences associated with trafficking in persons in the context of armed conflict may constitute war crimes\u201d, and it notes States\u2019 responsibility to \u201cprosecute those responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes as well as other crimes\u201d. The resolution calls for the \u201ctraining of relevant personnel of special political and peacekeeping missions\u201d. \n\n Security Council resolution 2462 (2019) on the financing of terrorism through illicit activities and sanctions lists \n This resolution reaffirms the Security Council\u2019s decision in its resolution 1373 (2001) that all States shall prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts, including through organized criminal activity, and shall refrain from providing support to those involved in them. Furthermore, the resolution urges all States to participate actively in implementing and updating the ISIL (Da\u2019esh) and Al-Qaida Sanctions List and to consider including, when submitting new listing requests, individuals and entities involved in the financing of terrorism. \n\n Security Council Resolution 2482 (2019) on threats to international peace and security caused by international terrorism and organized crime \n This resolution underlines that organized crime, along with terrorism and violent extremism, whether domestic or transnational, \u201cmay exacerbate conflicts in affected regions, and may contribute to undermining affected States, specifically their security, stability, governance, social and economic development\u201d and notes that organized criminal groups \u201ccan, in some cases and in some regions, complicate conflict prevention and resolution efforts\u201d. The resolution also notes the impact of the illicit drug trade, trafficking in persons and arms trafficking, and their links to corruption in furthering the financing of terrorism and fuelling conflict. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230322,14 +230322,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n\\n Security Council Resolution 2482 (2019) on threats to international peace and security caused by international terrorism and organized crime \\n This resolution underlines that organized crime, along with terrorism and violent extremism, whether domestic or transnational, \u201cmay exacerbate conflicts in affected regions, and may contribute to undermining affected States, specifically their security, stability, governance, social and economic development\u201d and notes that organized criminal groups \u201ccan, in some cases and in some regions, complicate conflict prevention and resolution efforts\u201d.", + "Sentence": "\n\n Security Council Resolution 2482 (2019) on threats to international peace and security caused by international terrorism and organized crime \n This resolution underlines that organized crime, along with terrorism and violent extremism, whether domestic or transnational, \u201cmay exacerbate conflicts in affected regions, and may contribute to undermining affected States, specifically their security, stability, governance, social and economic development\u201d and notes that organized criminal groups \u201ccan, in some cases and in some regions, complicate conflict prevention and resolution efforts\u201d.", "newParagraph": "security council resolution n united nation security council increasingly recognized role organized crime illicit market play sustaining fuelling contemporary conflict since untoc adopted 2000 un security council passed hundred resolution organized crime specific country mission region nn security council resolution 2220 2015 small arm n council emphasizes illicit trafficking small arm light weapon aid terrorism illegal armed group facilitate increasing level transnational organized crime underscore illicit trafficking could harm civilian including woman child create instability longterm governance challenge complicate conflict resolution nn security council resolution 2331 2016 trafficking person conflict situation including linkage activity armed group terrorism sexual violence conflict n security council recognizes connection trafficking person sexual violence terrorism transnational organized criminal activity prolong exacerbate conflict instability intensify impact civilian population council condemns act trafficking particularly sale trade person undertaken islamic state iraq levant isil also known da esh recognizes importance collecting preserving evidence relating act ensure responsible held accountable nn security council resolution 2388 2017 trafficking person armed conflict n resolution recognizes trafficking person area affected armed conflict post conflict situation purpose various form exploitation including sexual exploitation recruitment child soldier resolution underline importance providing appropriate care assistance service physical psychological social recovery rehabilitation reintegration full respect human right resolution also recognizes trafficking person entail violation abuse human right underscore certain act offence associated trafficking person context armed conflict may constitute war crime note state responsibility prosecute responsible genocide crime humanity war crime well crime resolution call training relevant personnel special political peacekeeping mission nn security council resolution 2462 2019 financing terrorism illicit activity sanction list n resolution reaffirms security council decision resolution 1373 2001 state shall prevent suppress financing terrorist act including organized criminal activity shall refrain providing support involved furthermore resolution urge state participate actively implementing updating isil da esh alqaida sanction list consider including submitting new listing request individual entity involved financing terrorism nn security council resolution 2482 2019 threat international peace security caused international terrorism organized crime n resolution underline organized crime along terrorism violent extremism whether domestic transnational may exacerbate conflict affected region may contribute undermining affected state specifically security stability governance social economic development note organized criminal group case region complicate conflict prevention resolution effort resolution also note impact illicit drug trade trafficking person arm trafficking link corruption furthering financing terrorism fuelling conflict ", "ProcessedSent": "nn security council resolution 2482 2019 threat international peace security caused international terrorism organized crime n resolution underline organized crime along terrorism violent extremism whether domestic transnational may exacerbate conflict affected region may contribute undermining affected state specifically security stability governance social economic development note organized criminal group case region complicate conflict prevention resolution effort ", "SentID": 12795 }, { "ParagraphID": 3483, - "Paragraph": "Security Council Resolutions \\n The United Nations Security Council has increasingly recognized the role that organized crime and illicit markets play in sustaining and fuelling contemporary conflicts. Since the UNTOC was adopted in 2000, the UN Security Council has passed hundreds of resolutions on organized crime in specific countries, missions or regions. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2220 (2015) on small arms \\n The Council emphasizes that the illicit trafficking in small arms and light weapons can aid terrorism and illegal armed groups and facilitate increasing levels of transnational organized crime, and underscores that such illicit trafficking could harm civilians, including women and children, create instability and long-term governance challenges, and complicate conflict resolution. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2331 (2016) on trafficking in persons in conflict situations, including linkages with the activities of armed groups, terrorism and sexual violence in conflict \\n The Security Council recognizes the connection between trafficking in persons, sexual violence, terrorism and other transnational organized criminal activities that can prolong and exacerbate conflict and instability or intensify its impact on civilian populations. The Council condemns all acts of trafficking, particularly the sale or trade in persons undertaken by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as Da\u2019esh), and recognizes the importance of collecting and preserving evidence relating to such acts to ensure that those responsible can be held accountable. \\n\\n Security Council Resolution 2388 (2017) on trafficking in persons in armed conflict \\n This resolution recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons in areas affected by armed conflict and post- conflict situations can be for the purpose of various forms of exploitation\u201d, including sexual exploitation and the recruitment of child soldiers. The resolution underlines the importance of providing \u201cappropriate care, assistance and services for their physical, psychological and social recovery, rehabilitation and reintegration, in full respect of their human rights\u201d. The resolution also recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons entails the violation or abuse of human rights\u201d and underscores \u201cthat certain acts or offences associated with trafficking in persons in the context of armed conflict may constitute war crimes\u201d, and it notes States\u2019 responsibility to \u201cprosecute those responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes as well as other crimes\u201d. The resolution calls for the \u201ctraining of relevant personnel of special political and peacekeeping missions\u201d. \\n\\n Security Council resolution 2462 (2019) on the financing of terrorism through illicit activities and sanctions lists \\n This resolution reaffirms the Security Council\u2019s decision in its resolution 1373 (2001) that all States shall prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts, including through organized criminal activity, and shall refrain from providing support to those involved in them. Furthermore, the resolution urges all States to participate actively in implementing and updating the ISIL (Da\u2019esh) and Al-Qaida Sanctions List and to consider including, when submitting new listing requests, individuals and entities involved in the financing of terrorism. \\n\\n Security Council Resolution 2482 (2019) on threats to international peace and security caused by international terrorism and organized crime \\n This resolution underlines that organized crime, along with terrorism and violent extremism, whether domestic or transnational, \u201cmay exacerbate conflicts in affected regions, and may contribute to undermining affected States, specifically their security, stability, governance, social and economic development\u201d and notes that organized criminal groups \u201ccan, in some cases and in some regions, complicate conflict prevention and resolution efforts\u201d. The resolution also notes the impact of the illicit drug trade, trafficking in persons and arms trafficking, and their links to corruption in furthering the financing of terrorism and fuelling conflict. ", + "Paragraph": "Security Council Resolutions \n The United Nations Security Council has increasingly recognized the role that organized crime and illicit markets play in sustaining and fuelling contemporary conflicts. Since the UNTOC was adopted in 2000, the UN Security Council has passed hundreds of resolutions on organized crime in specific countries, missions or regions. \n\n Security Council resolution 2220 (2015) on small arms \n The Council emphasizes that the illicit trafficking in small arms and light weapons can aid terrorism and illegal armed groups and facilitate increasing levels of transnational organized crime, and underscores that such illicit trafficking could harm civilians, including women and children, create instability and long-term governance challenges, and complicate conflict resolution. \n\n Security Council resolution 2331 (2016) on trafficking in persons in conflict situations, including linkages with the activities of armed groups, terrorism and sexual violence in conflict \n The Security Council recognizes the connection between trafficking in persons, sexual violence, terrorism and other transnational organized criminal activities that can prolong and exacerbate conflict and instability or intensify its impact on civilian populations. The Council condemns all acts of trafficking, particularly the sale or trade in persons undertaken by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as Da\u2019esh), and recognizes the importance of collecting and preserving evidence relating to such acts to ensure that those responsible can be held accountable. \n\n Security Council Resolution 2388 (2017) on trafficking in persons in armed conflict \n This resolution recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons in areas affected by armed conflict and post- conflict situations can be for the purpose of various forms of exploitation\u201d, including sexual exploitation and the recruitment of child soldiers. The resolution underlines the importance of providing \u201cappropriate care, assistance and services for their physical, psychological and social recovery, rehabilitation and reintegration, in full respect of their human rights\u201d. The resolution also recognizes \u201cthat trafficking in persons entails the violation or abuse of human rights\u201d and underscores \u201cthat certain acts or offences associated with trafficking in persons in the context of armed conflict may constitute war crimes\u201d, and it notes States\u2019 responsibility to \u201cprosecute those responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes as well as other crimes\u201d. The resolution calls for the \u201ctraining of relevant personnel of special political and peacekeeping missions\u201d. \n\n Security Council resolution 2462 (2019) on the financing of terrorism through illicit activities and sanctions lists \n This resolution reaffirms the Security Council\u2019s decision in its resolution 1373 (2001) that all States shall prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts, including through organized criminal activity, and shall refrain from providing support to those involved in them. Furthermore, the resolution urges all States to participate actively in implementing and updating the ISIL (Da\u2019esh) and Al-Qaida Sanctions List and to consider including, when submitting new listing requests, individuals and entities involved in the financing of terrorism. \n\n Security Council Resolution 2482 (2019) on threats to international peace and security caused by international terrorism and organized crime \n This resolution underlines that organized crime, along with terrorism and violent extremism, whether domestic or transnational, \u201cmay exacerbate conflicts in affected regions, and may contribute to undermining affected States, specifically their security, stability, governance, social and economic development\u201d and notes that organized criminal groups \u201ccan, in some cases and in some regions, complicate conflict prevention and resolution efforts\u201d. The resolution also notes the impact of the illicit drug trade, trafficking in persons and arms trafficking, and their links to corruption in furthering the financing of terrorism and fuelling conflict. ", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230347,7 +230347,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3484, - "Paragraph": "Environmental Crime \\n A number of General Assembly and Security Council documents highlight the intersection between conflict, criminality and the illicit exploitation of natural resources. Crimes against the environment, such as deforestation, illegal logging, fishing and the illicit wildlife trade have a more fragmented legal framework. For more information on specific natural resources policy frameworks and legal instruments, refer to IDDRS 6.30 on DDR and Natural Resources.", + "Paragraph": "Environmental Crime \n A number of General Assembly and Security Council documents highlight the intersection between conflict, criminality and the illicit exploitation of natural resources. Crimes against the environment, such as deforestation, illegal logging, fishing and the illicit wildlife trade have a more fragmented legal framework. For more information on specific natural resources policy frameworks and legal instruments, refer to IDDRS 6.30 on DDR and Natural Resources.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230358,14 +230358,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "Environmental Crime \\n A number of General Assembly and Security Council documents highlight the intersection between conflict, criminality and the illicit exploitation of natural resources.", + "Sentence": "Environmental Crime \n A number of General Assembly and Security Council documents highlight the intersection between conflict, criminality and the illicit exploitation of natural resources.", "newParagraph": "environmental crime n number general assembly security council document highlight intersection conflict criminality illicit exploitation natural resource crime environment deforestation illegal logging fishing illicit wildlife trade fragmented legal framework information specific natural resource policy framework legal instrument refer iddrs 630 ddr natural resource", "ProcessedSent": "environmental crime n number general assembly security council document highlight intersection conflict criminality illicit exploitation natural resource", "SentID": 12797 }, { "ParagraphID": 3484, - "Paragraph": "Environmental Crime \\n A number of General Assembly and Security Council documents highlight the intersection between conflict, criminality and the illicit exploitation of natural resources. Crimes against the environment, such as deforestation, illegal logging, fishing and the illicit wildlife trade have a more fragmented legal framework. For more information on specific natural resources policy frameworks and legal instruments, refer to IDDRS 6.30 on DDR and Natural Resources.", + "Paragraph": "Environmental Crime \n A number of General Assembly and Security Council documents highlight the intersection between conflict, criminality and the illicit exploitation of natural resources. Crimes against the environment, such as deforestation, illegal logging, fishing and the illicit wildlife trade have a more fragmented legal framework. For more information on specific natural resources policy frameworks and legal instruments, refer to IDDRS 6.30 on DDR and Natural Resources.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230383,7 +230383,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3484, - "Paragraph": "Environmental Crime \\n A number of General Assembly and Security Council documents highlight the intersection between conflict, criminality and the illicit exploitation of natural resources. Crimes against the environment, such as deforestation, illegal logging, fishing and the illicit wildlife trade have a more fragmented legal framework. For more information on specific natural resources policy frameworks and legal instruments, refer to IDDRS 6.30 on DDR and Natural Resources.", + "Paragraph": "Environmental Crime \n A number of General Assembly and Security Council documents highlight the intersection between conflict, criminality and the illicit exploitation of natural resources. Crimes against the environment, such as deforestation, illegal logging, fishing and the illicit wildlife trade have a more fragmented legal framework. For more information on specific natural resources policy frameworks and legal instruments, refer to IDDRS 6.30 on DDR and Natural Resources.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230401,7 +230401,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3485, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \\n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \\n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \\n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \\n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \\n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \\n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \\n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \\n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \\n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \\n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \\n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \\n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \\n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \\n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \\n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230419,7 +230419,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3485, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \\n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \\n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \\n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \\n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \\n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \\n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \\n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \\n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \\n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \\n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \\n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \\n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \\n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \\n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \\n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230430,14 +230430,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b).", + "Sentence": "\n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b).", "newParagraph": "1 united nation convention transnational crime article 2a n 2 united nation convention transnational crime article 2b n 3 united nation convention transnational crime article 2 c n 4 christina steenkamp crimeconflict nexus civil war syria stability vol 6 1 2017 n 5 marina caparini un police challenge organized crime discussion paper sipri april 2019 n 6 ibid n 7 steenkamp crimeconflict nexus n 8 see instance unsc resolution 2482 2019 n 9 philip gounev tihomir bezlov examining link organized crime corruption centre study democracy 2010 n 10 mark shaw tuesday reitano global illicit flow local conflict dynamic case preemptive analysis experimental policy option crimeconflict nexus series 2 united nation university 2017 n 11 caparini un police n 12 heiko nitzschke transforming war economy challenge peacemaking peacebuilding new york international peace academy december 2003 n 13 virginia comolli ed organized crime illicit trade respond strategic challenge old new domain cham switzerland springer international 2018 n 14 united nation office drug crime global report trafficking person 2018 booklet 2 trafficking person context armed conflict new york 2018 n 15 international alert organised crime mali matter peaceful transition conflict policy brief 2016 n 16 matt herbert el salvador gang truce durable model global initiative transnational organized crime july 2013 charles katz e c hedberg luis enrique amaya gang truce violence prevention el salvador bulletin world health organization june 2016 n 17 united nation environmental programme unep rise environmental crime growing threat natural resource peace development security unepinterpol rapid response assessment 2016 unep united nation development programme role natural resource disarmament demobilization reintegration addressing risk seizing opportunity 2013 n 18 programme action illicit trade small arm light weapon legally binding instrument universal political framework measure tackle illicit trade including context organized crime information programme action well related international tracing instrument see httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmssalwprogrammeofaction", "ProcessedSent": "n 2 united nation convention transnational crime article 2b", "SentID": 12801 }, { "ParagraphID": 3485, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \\n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \\n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \\n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \\n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \\n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \\n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \\n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \\n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \\n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \\n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \\n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \\n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \\n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \\n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \\n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230448,14 +230448,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c).", + "Sentence": "\n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c).", "newParagraph": "1 united nation convention transnational crime article 2a n 2 united nation convention transnational crime article 2b n 3 united nation convention transnational crime article 2 c n 4 christina steenkamp crimeconflict nexus civil war syria stability vol 6 1 2017 n 5 marina caparini un police challenge organized crime discussion paper sipri april 2019 n 6 ibid n 7 steenkamp crimeconflict nexus n 8 see instance unsc resolution 2482 2019 n 9 philip gounev tihomir bezlov examining link organized crime corruption centre study democracy 2010 n 10 mark shaw tuesday reitano global illicit flow local conflict dynamic case preemptive analysis experimental policy option crimeconflict nexus series 2 united nation university 2017 n 11 caparini un police n 12 heiko nitzschke transforming war economy challenge peacemaking peacebuilding new york international peace academy december 2003 n 13 virginia comolli ed organized crime illicit trade respond strategic challenge old new domain cham switzerland springer international 2018 n 14 united nation office drug crime global report trafficking person 2018 booklet 2 trafficking person context armed conflict new york 2018 n 15 international alert organised crime mali matter peaceful transition conflict policy brief 2016 n 16 matt herbert el salvador gang truce durable model global initiative transnational organized crime july 2013 charles katz e c hedberg luis enrique amaya gang truce violence prevention el salvador bulletin world health organization june 2016 n 17 united nation environmental programme unep rise environmental crime growing threat natural resource peace development security unepinterpol rapid response assessment 2016 unep united nation development programme role natural resource disarmament demobilization reintegration addressing risk seizing opportunity 2013 n 18 programme action illicit trade small arm light weapon legally binding instrument universal political framework measure tackle illicit trade including context organized crime information programme action well related international tracing instrument see httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmssalwprogrammeofaction", "ProcessedSent": "n 3 united nation convention transnational crime article 2 c", "SentID": 12802 }, { "ParagraphID": 3485, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \\n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \\n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \\n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \\n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \\n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \\n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \\n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \\n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \\n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \\n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \\n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \\n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \\n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \\n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \\n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230466,14 +230466,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol.", + "Sentence": "\n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol.", "newParagraph": "1 united nation convention transnational crime article 2a n 2 united nation convention transnational crime article 2b n 3 united nation convention transnational crime article 2 c n 4 christina steenkamp crimeconflict nexus civil war syria stability vol 6 1 2017 n 5 marina caparini un police challenge organized crime discussion paper sipri april 2019 n 6 ibid n 7 steenkamp crimeconflict nexus n 8 see instance unsc resolution 2482 2019 n 9 philip gounev tihomir bezlov examining link organized crime corruption centre study democracy 2010 n 10 mark shaw tuesday reitano global illicit flow local conflict dynamic case preemptive analysis experimental policy option crimeconflict nexus series 2 united nation university 2017 n 11 caparini un police n 12 heiko nitzschke transforming war economy challenge peacemaking peacebuilding new york international peace academy december 2003 n 13 virginia comolli ed organized crime illicit trade respond strategic challenge old new domain cham switzerland springer international 2018 n 14 united nation office drug crime global report trafficking person 2018 booklet 2 trafficking person context armed conflict new york 2018 n 15 international alert organised crime mali matter peaceful transition conflict policy brief 2016 n 16 matt herbert el salvador gang truce durable model global initiative transnational organized crime july 2013 charles katz e c hedberg luis enrique amaya gang truce violence prevention el salvador bulletin world health organization june 2016 n 17 united nation environmental programme unep rise environmental crime growing threat natural resource peace development security unepinterpol rapid response assessment 2016 unep united nation development programme role natural resource disarmament demobilization reintegration addressing risk seizing opportunity 2013 n 18 programme action illicit trade small arm light weapon legally binding instrument universal political framework measure tackle illicit trade including context organized crime information programme action well related international tracing instrument see httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmssalwprogrammeofaction", "ProcessedSent": "n 4 christina steenkamp crimeconflict nexus civil war syria stability vol", "SentID": 12803 }, { "ParagraphID": 3485, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \\n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \\n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \\n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \\n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \\n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \\n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \\n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \\n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \\n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \\n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \\n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \\n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \\n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \\n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \\n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230491,7 +230491,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3485, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \\n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \\n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \\n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \\n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \\n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \\n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \\n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \\n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \\n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \\n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \\n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \\n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \\n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \\n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \\n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230509,7 +230509,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3485, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \\n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \\n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \\n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \\n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \\n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \\n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \\n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \\n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \\n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \\n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \\n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \\n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \\n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \\n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \\n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230520,14 +230520,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019).", + "Sentence": "\n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019).", "newParagraph": "1 united nation convention transnational crime article 2a n 2 united nation convention transnational crime article 2b n 3 united nation convention transnational crime article 2 c n 4 christina steenkamp crimeconflict nexus civil war syria stability vol 6 1 2017 n 5 marina caparini un police challenge organized crime discussion paper sipri april 2019 n 6 ibid n 7 steenkamp crimeconflict nexus n 8 see instance unsc resolution 2482 2019 n 9 philip gounev tihomir bezlov examining link organized crime corruption centre study democracy 2010 n 10 mark shaw tuesday reitano global illicit flow local conflict dynamic case preemptive analysis experimental policy option crimeconflict nexus series 2 united nation university 2017 n 11 caparini un police n 12 heiko nitzschke transforming war economy challenge peacemaking peacebuilding new york international peace academy december 2003 n 13 virginia comolli ed organized crime illicit trade respond strategic challenge old new domain cham switzerland springer international 2018 n 14 united nation office drug crime global report trafficking person 2018 booklet 2 trafficking person context armed conflict new york 2018 n 15 international alert organised crime mali matter peaceful transition conflict policy brief 2016 n 16 matt herbert el salvador gang truce durable model global initiative transnational organized crime july 2013 charles katz e c hedberg luis enrique amaya gang truce violence prevention el salvador bulletin world health organization june 2016 n 17 united nation environmental programme unep rise environmental crime growing threat natural resource peace development security unepinterpol rapid response assessment 2016 unep united nation development programme role natural resource disarmament demobilization reintegration addressing risk seizing opportunity 2013 n 18 programme action illicit trade small arm light weapon legally binding instrument universal political framework measure tackle illicit trade including context organized crime information programme action well related international tracing instrument see httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmssalwprogrammeofaction", "ProcessedSent": "n 5 marina caparini un police challenge organized crime discussion paper sipri april 2019", "SentID": 12806 }, { "ParagraphID": 3485, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \\n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \\n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \\n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \\n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \\n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \\n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \\n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \\n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \\n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \\n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \\n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \\n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \\n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \\n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \\n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230538,14 +230538,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 6 Ibid.", + "Sentence": "\n 6 Ibid.", "newParagraph": "1 united nation convention transnational crime article 2a n 2 united nation convention transnational crime article 2b n 3 united nation convention transnational crime article 2 c n 4 christina steenkamp crimeconflict nexus civil war syria stability vol 6 1 2017 n 5 marina caparini un police challenge organized crime discussion paper sipri april 2019 n 6 ibid n 7 steenkamp crimeconflict nexus n 8 see instance unsc resolution 2482 2019 n 9 philip gounev tihomir bezlov examining link organized crime corruption centre study democracy 2010 n 10 mark shaw tuesday reitano global illicit flow local conflict dynamic case preemptive analysis experimental policy option crimeconflict nexus series 2 united nation university 2017 n 11 caparini un police n 12 heiko nitzschke transforming war economy challenge peacemaking peacebuilding new york international peace academy december 2003 n 13 virginia comolli ed organized crime illicit trade respond strategic challenge old new domain cham switzerland springer international 2018 n 14 united nation office drug crime global report trafficking person 2018 booklet 2 trafficking person context armed conflict new york 2018 n 15 international alert organised crime mali matter peaceful transition conflict policy brief 2016 n 16 matt herbert el salvador gang truce durable model global initiative transnational organized crime july 2013 charles katz e c hedberg luis enrique amaya gang truce violence prevention el salvador bulletin world health organization june 2016 n 17 united nation environmental programme unep rise environmental crime growing threat natural resource peace development security unepinterpol rapid response assessment 2016 unep united nation development programme role natural resource disarmament demobilization reintegration addressing risk seizing opportunity 2013 n 18 programme action illicit trade small arm light weapon legally binding instrument universal political framework measure tackle illicit trade including context organized crime information programme action well related international tracing instrument see httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmssalwprogrammeofaction", "ProcessedSent": "n 6 ibid", "SentID": 12807 }, { "ParagraphID": 3485, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \\n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \\n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \\n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \\n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \\n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \\n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \\n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \\n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \\n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \\n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \\n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \\n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \\n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \\n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \\n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230556,14 +230556,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d.", + "Sentence": "\n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d.", "newParagraph": "1 united nation convention transnational crime article 2a n 2 united nation convention transnational crime article 2b n 3 united nation convention transnational crime article 2 c n 4 christina steenkamp crimeconflict nexus civil war syria stability vol 6 1 2017 n 5 marina caparini un police challenge organized crime discussion paper sipri april 2019 n 6 ibid n 7 steenkamp crimeconflict nexus n 8 see instance unsc resolution 2482 2019 n 9 philip gounev tihomir bezlov examining link organized crime corruption centre study democracy 2010 n 10 mark shaw tuesday reitano global illicit flow local conflict dynamic case preemptive analysis experimental policy option crimeconflict nexus series 2 united nation university 2017 n 11 caparini un police n 12 heiko nitzschke transforming war economy challenge peacemaking peacebuilding new york international peace academy december 2003 n 13 virginia comolli ed organized crime illicit trade respond strategic challenge old new domain cham switzerland springer international 2018 n 14 united nation office drug crime global report trafficking person 2018 booklet 2 trafficking person context armed conflict new york 2018 n 15 international alert organised crime mali matter peaceful transition conflict policy brief 2016 n 16 matt herbert el salvador gang truce durable model global initiative transnational organized crime july 2013 charles katz e c hedberg luis enrique amaya gang truce violence prevention el salvador bulletin world health organization june 2016 n 17 united nation environmental programme unep rise environmental crime growing threat natural resource peace development security unepinterpol rapid response assessment 2016 unep united nation development programme role natural resource disarmament demobilization reintegration addressing risk seizing opportunity 2013 n 18 programme action illicit trade small arm light weapon legally binding instrument universal political framework measure tackle illicit trade including context organized crime information programme action well related international tracing instrument see httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmssalwprogrammeofaction", "ProcessedSent": "n 7 steenkamp crimeconflict nexus ", "SentID": 12808 }, { "ParagraphID": 3485, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \\n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \\n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \\n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \\n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \\n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \\n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \\n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \\n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \\n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \\n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \\n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \\n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \\n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \\n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \\n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230574,14 +230574,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019).", + "Sentence": "\n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019).", "newParagraph": "1 united nation convention transnational crime article 2a n 2 united nation convention transnational crime article 2b n 3 united nation convention transnational crime article 2 c n 4 christina steenkamp crimeconflict nexus civil war syria stability vol 6 1 2017 n 5 marina caparini un police challenge organized crime discussion paper sipri april 2019 n 6 ibid n 7 steenkamp crimeconflict nexus n 8 see instance unsc resolution 2482 2019 n 9 philip gounev tihomir bezlov examining link organized crime corruption centre study democracy 2010 n 10 mark shaw tuesday reitano global illicit flow local conflict dynamic case preemptive analysis experimental policy option crimeconflict nexus series 2 united nation university 2017 n 11 caparini un police n 12 heiko nitzschke transforming war economy challenge peacemaking peacebuilding new york international peace academy december 2003 n 13 virginia comolli ed organized crime illicit trade respond strategic challenge old new domain cham switzerland springer international 2018 n 14 united nation office drug crime global report trafficking person 2018 booklet 2 trafficking person context armed conflict new york 2018 n 15 international alert organised crime mali matter peaceful transition conflict policy brief 2016 n 16 matt herbert el salvador gang truce durable model global initiative transnational organized crime july 2013 charles katz e c hedberg luis enrique amaya gang truce violence prevention el salvador bulletin world health organization june 2016 n 17 united nation environmental programme unep rise environmental crime growing threat natural resource peace development security unepinterpol rapid response assessment 2016 unep united nation development programme role natural resource disarmament demobilization reintegration addressing risk seizing opportunity 2013 n 18 programme action illicit trade small arm light weapon legally binding instrument universal political framework measure tackle illicit trade including context organized crime information programme action well related international tracing instrument see httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmssalwprogrammeofaction", "ProcessedSent": "n 8 see instance unsc resolution 2482 2019", "SentID": 12809 }, { "ParagraphID": 3485, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \\n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \\n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \\n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \\n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \\n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \\n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \\n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \\n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \\n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \\n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \\n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \\n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \\n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \\n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \\n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230592,14 +230592,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010).", + "Sentence": "\n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010).", "newParagraph": "1 united nation convention transnational crime article 2a n 2 united nation convention transnational crime article 2b n 3 united nation convention transnational crime article 2 c n 4 christina steenkamp crimeconflict nexus civil war syria stability vol 6 1 2017 n 5 marina caparini un police challenge organized crime discussion paper sipri april 2019 n 6 ibid n 7 steenkamp crimeconflict nexus n 8 see instance unsc resolution 2482 2019 n 9 philip gounev tihomir bezlov examining link organized crime corruption centre study democracy 2010 n 10 mark shaw tuesday reitano global illicit flow local conflict dynamic case preemptive analysis experimental policy option crimeconflict nexus series 2 united nation university 2017 n 11 caparini un police n 12 heiko nitzschke transforming war economy challenge peacemaking peacebuilding new york international peace academy december 2003 n 13 virginia comolli ed organized crime illicit trade respond strategic challenge old new domain cham switzerland springer international 2018 n 14 united nation office drug crime global report trafficking person 2018 booklet 2 trafficking person context armed conflict new york 2018 n 15 international alert organised crime mali matter peaceful transition conflict policy brief 2016 n 16 matt herbert el salvador gang truce durable model global initiative transnational organized crime july 2013 charles katz e c hedberg luis enrique amaya gang truce violence prevention el salvador bulletin world health organization june 2016 n 17 united nation environmental programme unep rise environmental crime growing threat natural resource peace development security unepinterpol rapid response assessment 2016 unep united nation development programme role natural resource disarmament demobilization reintegration addressing risk seizing opportunity 2013 n 18 programme action illicit trade small arm light weapon legally binding instrument universal political framework measure tackle illicit trade including context organized crime information programme action well related international tracing instrument see httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmssalwprogrammeofaction", "ProcessedSent": "n 9 philip gounev tihomir bezlov examining link organized crime corruption centre study democracy 2010", "SentID": 12810 }, { "ParagraphID": 3485, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \\n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \\n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \\n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \\n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \\n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \\n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \\n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \\n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \\n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \\n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \\n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \\n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \\n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \\n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \\n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230610,14 +230610,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No.", + "Sentence": "\n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No.", "newParagraph": "1 united nation convention transnational crime article 2a n 2 united nation convention transnational crime article 2b n 3 united nation convention transnational crime article 2 c n 4 christina steenkamp crimeconflict nexus civil war syria stability vol 6 1 2017 n 5 marina caparini un police challenge organized crime discussion paper sipri april 2019 n 6 ibid n 7 steenkamp crimeconflict nexus n 8 see instance unsc resolution 2482 2019 n 9 philip gounev tihomir bezlov examining link organized crime corruption centre study democracy 2010 n 10 mark shaw tuesday reitano global illicit flow local conflict dynamic case preemptive analysis experimental policy option crimeconflict nexus series 2 united nation university 2017 n 11 caparini un police n 12 heiko nitzschke transforming war economy challenge peacemaking peacebuilding new york international peace academy december 2003 n 13 virginia comolli ed organized crime illicit trade respond strategic challenge old new domain cham switzerland springer international 2018 n 14 united nation office drug crime global report trafficking person 2018 booklet 2 trafficking person context armed conflict new york 2018 n 15 international alert organised crime mali matter peaceful transition conflict policy brief 2016 n 16 matt herbert el salvador gang truce durable model global initiative transnational organized crime july 2013 charles katz e c hedberg luis enrique amaya gang truce violence prevention el salvador bulletin world health organization june 2016 n 17 united nation environmental programme unep rise environmental crime growing threat natural resource peace development security unepinterpol rapid response assessment 2016 unep united nation development programme role natural resource disarmament demobilization reintegration addressing risk seizing opportunity 2013 n 18 programme action illicit trade small arm light weapon legally binding instrument universal political framework measure tackle illicit trade including context organized crime information programme action well related international tracing instrument see httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmssalwprogrammeofaction", "ProcessedSent": "n 10 mark shaw tuesday reitano global illicit flow local conflict dynamic case preemptive analysis experimental policy option crimeconflict nexus series", "SentID": 12811 }, { "ParagraphID": 3485, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \\n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \\n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \\n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \\n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \\n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \\n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \\n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \\n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \\n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \\n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \\n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \\n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \\n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \\n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \\n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230635,7 +230635,7 @@ }, { "ParagraphID": 3485, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \\n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \\n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \\n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \\n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \\n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \\n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \\n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \\n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \\n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \\n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \\n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \\n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \\n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \\n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \\n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230646,14 +230646,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d.", + "Sentence": "\n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d.", "newParagraph": "1 united nation convention transnational crime article 2a n 2 united nation convention transnational crime article 2b n 3 united nation convention transnational crime article 2 c n 4 christina steenkamp crimeconflict nexus civil war syria stability vol 6 1 2017 n 5 marina caparini un police challenge organized crime discussion paper sipri april 2019 n 6 ibid n 7 steenkamp crimeconflict nexus n 8 see instance unsc resolution 2482 2019 n 9 philip gounev tihomir bezlov examining link organized crime corruption centre study democracy 2010 n 10 mark shaw tuesday reitano global illicit flow local conflict dynamic case preemptive analysis experimental policy option crimeconflict nexus series 2 united nation university 2017 n 11 caparini un police n 12 heiko nitzschke transforming war economy challenge peacemaking peacebuilding new york international peace academy december 2003 n 13 virginia comolli ed organized crime illicit trade respond strategic challenge old new domain cham switzerland springer international 2018 n 14 united nation office drug crime global report trafficking person 2018 booklet 2 trafficking person context armed conflict new york 2018 n 15 international alert organised crime mali matter peaceful transition conflict policy brief 2016 n 16 matt herbert el salvador gang truce durable model global initiative transnational organized crime july 2013 charles katz e c hedberg luis enrique amaya gang truce violence prevention el salvador bulletin world health organization june 2016 n 17 united nation environmental programme unep rise environmental crime growing threat natural resource peace development security unepinterpol rapid response assessment 2016 unep united nation development programme role natural resource disarmament demobilization reintegration addressing risk seizing opportunity 2013 n 18 programme action illicit trade small arm light weapon legally binding instrument universal political framework measure tackle illicit trade including context organized crime information programme action well related international tracing instrument see httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmssalwprogrammeofaction", "ProcessedSent": "n 11 caparini un police ", "SentID": 12813 }, { "ParagraphID": 3485, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \\n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \\n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \\n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \\n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \\n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \\n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \\n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \\n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \\n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \\n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \\n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \\n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \\n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \\n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \\n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230664,14 +230664,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003).", + "Sentence": "\n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003).", "newParagraph": "1 united nation convention transnational crime article 2a n 2 united nation convention transnational crime article 2b n 3 united nation convention transnational crime article 2 c n 4 christina steenkamp crimeconflict nexus civil war syria stability vol 6 1 2017 n 5 marina caparini un police challenge organized crime discussion paper sipri april 2019 n 6 ibid n 7 steenkamp crimeconflict nexus n 8 see instance unsc resolution 2482 2019 n 9 philip gounev tihomir bezlov examining link organized crime corruption centre study democracy 2010 n 10 mark shaw tuesday reitano global illicit flow local conflict dynamic case preemptive analysis experimental policy option crimeconflict nexus series 2 united nation university 2017 n 11 caparini un police n 12 heiko nitzschke transforming war economy challenge peacemaking peacebuilding new york international peace academy december 2003 n 13 virginia comolli ed organized crime illicit trade respond strategic challenge old new domain cham switzerland springer international 2018 n 14 united nation office drug crime global report trafficking person 2018 booklet 2 trafficking person context armed conflict new york 2018 n 15 international alert organised crime mali matter peaceful transition conflict policy brief 2016 n 16 matt herbert el salvador gang truce durable model global initiative transnational organized crime july 2013 charles katz e c hedberg luis enrique amaya gang truce violence prevention el salvador bulletin world health organization june 2016 n 17 united nation environmental programme unep rise environmental crime growing threat natural resource peace development security unepinterpol rapid response assessment 2016 unep united nation development programme role natural resource disarmament demobilization reintegration addressing risk seizing opportunity 2013 n 18 programme action illicit trade small arm light weapon legally binding instrument universal political framework measure tackle illicit trade including context organized crime information programme action well related international tracing instrument see httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmssalwprogrammeofaction", "ProcessedSent": "n 12 heiko nitzschke transforming war economy challenge peacemaking peacebuilding new york international peace academy december 2003", "SentID": 12814 }, { "ParagraphID": 3485, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \\n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \\n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \\n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \\n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \\n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \\n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \\n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \\n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \\n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \\n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \\n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \\n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \\n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \\n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \\n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230682,14 +230682,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018).", + "Sentence": "\n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018).", "newParagraph": "1 united nation convention transnational crime article 2a n 2 united nation convention transnational crime article 2b n 3 united nation convention transnational crime article 2 c n 4 christina steenkamp crimeconflict nexus civil war syria stability vol 6 1 2017 n 5 marina caparini un police challenge organized crime discussion paper sipri april 2019 n 6 ibid n 7 steenkamp crimeconflict nexus n 8 see instance unsc resolution 2482 2019 n 9 philip gounev tihomir bezlov examining link organized crime corruption centre study democracy 2010 n 10 mark shaw tuesday reitano global illicit flow local conflict dynamic case preemptive analysis experimental policy option crimeconflict nexus series 2 united nation university 2017 n 11 caparini un police n 12 heiko nitzschke transforming war economy challenge peacemaking peacebuilding new york international peace academy december 2003 n 13 virginia comolli ed organized crime illicit trade respond strategic challenge old new domain cham switzerland springer international 2018 n 14 united nation office drug crime global report trafficking person 2018 booklet 2 trafficking person context armed conflict new york 2018 n 15 international alert organised crime mali matter peaceful transition conflict policy brief 2016 n 16 matt herbert el salvador gang truce durable model global initiative transnational organized crime july 2013 charles katz e c hedberg luis enrique amaya gang truce violence prevention el salvador bulletin world health organization june 2016 n 17 united nation environmental programme unep rise environmental crime growing threat natural resource peace development security unepinterpol rapid response assessment 2016 unep united nation development programme role natural resource disarmament demobilization reintegration addressing risk seizing opportunity 2013 n 18 programme action illicit trade small arm light weapon legally binding instrument universal political framework measure tackle illicit trade including context organized crime information programme action well related international tracing instrument see httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmssalwprogrammeofaction", "ProcessedSent": "n 13 virginia comolli ed organized crime illicit trade respond strategic challenge old new domain cham switzerland springer international 2018", "SentID": 12815 }, { "ParagraphID": 3485, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \\n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \\n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \\n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \\n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \\n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \\n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \\n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \\n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \\n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \\n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \\n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \\n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \\n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \\n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \\n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230700,14 +230700,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018).", + "Sentence": "\n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018).", "newParagraph": "1 united nation convention transnational crime article 2a n 2 united nation convention transnational crime article 2b n 3 united nation convention transnational crime article 2 c n 4 christina steenkamp crimeconflict nexus civil war syria stability vol 6 1 2017 n 5 marina caparini un police challenge organized crime discussion paper sipri april 2019 n 6 ibid n 7 steenkamp crimeconflict nexus n 8 see instance unsc resolution 2482 2019 n 9 philip gounev tihomir bezlov examining link organized crime corruption centre study democracy 2010 n 10 mark shaw tuesday reitano global illicit flow local conflict dynamic case preemptive analysis experimental policy option crimeconflict nexus series 2 united nation university 2017 n 11 caparini un police n 12 heiko nitzschke transforming war economy challenge peacemaking peacebuilding new york international peace academy december 2003 n 13 virginia comolli ed organized crime illicit trade respond strategic challenge old new domain cham switzerland springer international 2018 n 14 united nation office drug crime global report trafficking person 2018 booklet 2 trafficking person context armed conflict new york 2018 n 15 international alert organised crime mali matter peaceful transition conflict policy brief 2016 n 16 matt herbert el salvador gang truce durable model global initiative transnational organized crime july 2013 charles katz e c hedberg luis enrique amaya gang truce violence prevention el salvador bulletin world health organization june 2016 n 17 united nation environmental programme unep rise environmental crime growing threat natural resource peace development security unepinterpol rapid response assessment 2016 unep united nation development programme role natural resource disarmament demobilization reintegration addressing risk seizing opportunity 2013 n 18 programme action illicit trade small arm light weapon legally binding instrument universal political framework measure tackle illicit trade including context organized crime information programme action well related international tracing instrument see httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmssalwprogrammeofaction", "ProcessedSent": "n 14 united nation office drug crime global report trafficking person 2018 booklet 2 trafficking person context armed conflict new york 2018", "SentID": 12816 }, { "ParagraphID": 3485, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \\n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \\n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \\n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \\n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \\n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \\n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \\n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \\n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \\n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \\n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \\n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \\n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \\n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \\n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \\n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230718,14 +230718,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016).", + "Sentence": "\n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016).", "newParagraph": "1 united nation convention transnational crime article 2a n 2 united nation convention transnational crime article 2b n 3 united nation convention transnational crime article 2 c n 4 christina steenkamp crimeconflict nexus civil war syria stability vol 6 1 2017 n 5 marina caparini un police challenge organized crime discussion paper sipri april 2019 n 6 ibid n 7 steenkamp crimeconflict nexus n 8 see instance unsc resolution 2482 2019 n 9 philip gounev tihomir bezlov examining link organized crime corruption centre study democracy 2010 n 10 mark shaw tuesday reitano global illicit flow local conflict dynamic case preemptive analysis experimental policy option crimeconflict nexus series 2 united nation university 2017 n 11 caparini un police n 12 heiko nitzschke transforming war economy challenge peacemaking peacebuilding new york international peace academy december 2003 n 13 virginia comolli ed organized crime illicit trade respond strategic challenge old new domain cham switzerland springer international 2018 n 14 united nation office drug crime global report trafficking person 2018 booklet 2 trafficking person context armed conflict new york 2018 n 15 international alert organised crime mali matter peaceful transition conflict policy brief 2016 n 16 matt herbert el salvador gang truce durable model global initiative transnational organized crime july 2013 charles katz e c hedberg luis enrique amaya gang truce violence prevention el salvador bulletin world health organization june 2016 n 17 united nation environmental programme unep rise environmental crime growing threat natural resource peace development security unepinterpol rapid response assessment 2016 unep united nation development programme role natural resource disarmament demobilization reintegration addressing risk seizing opportunity 2013 n 18 programme action illicit trade small arm light weapon legally binding instrument universal political framework measure tackle illicit trade including context organized crime information programme action well related international tracing instrument see httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmssalwprogrammeofaction", "ProcessedSent": "n 15 international alert organised crime mali matter peaceful transition conflict policy brief 2016", "SentID": 12817 }, { "ParagraphID": 3485, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \\n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \\n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \\n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \\n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \\n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \\n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \\n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \\n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \\n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \\n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \\n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \\n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \\n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \\n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \\n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230736,14 +230736,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016).", + "Sentence": "\n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016).", "newParagraph": "1 united nation convention transnational crime article 2a n 2 united nation convention transnational crime article 2b n 3 united nation convention transnational crime article 2 c n 4 christina steenkamp crimeconflict nexus civil war syria stability vol 6 1 2017 n 5 marina caparini un police challenge organized crime discussion paper sipri april 2019 n 6 ibid n 7 steenkamp crimeconflict nexus n 8 see instance unsc resolution 2482 2019 n 9 philip gounev tihomir bezlov examining link organized crime corruption centre study democracy 2010 n 10 mark shaw tuesday reitano global illicit flow local conflict dynamic case preemptive analysis experimental policy option crimeconflict nexus series 2 united nation university 2017 n 11 caparini un police n 12 heiko nitzschke transforming war economy challenge peacemaking peacebuilding new york international peace academy december 2003 n 13 virginia comolli ed organized crime illicit trade respond strategic challenge old new domain cham switzerland springer international 2018 n 14 united nation office drug crime global report trafficking person 2018 booklet 2 trafficking person context armed conflict new york 2018 n 15 international alert organised crime mali matter peaceful transition conflict policy brief 2016 n 16 matt herbert el salvador gang truce durable model global initiative transnational organized crime july 2013 charles katz e c hedberg luis enrique amaya gang truce violence prevention el salvador bulletin world health organization june 2016 n 17 united nation environmental programme unep rise environmental crime growing threat natural resource peace development security unepinterpol rapid response assessment 2016 unep united nation development programme role natural resource disarmament demobilization reintegration addressing risk seizing opportunity 2013 n 18 programme action illicit trade small arm light weapon legally binding instrument universal political framework measure tackle illicit trade including context organized crime information programme action well related international tracing instrument see httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmssalwprogrammeofaction", "ProcessedSent": "n 16 matt herbert el salvador gang truce durable model global initiative transnational organized crime july 2013 charles katz e c hedberg luis enrique amaya gang truce violence prevention el salvador bulletin world health organization june 2016", "SentID": 12818 }, { "ParagraphID": 3485, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \\n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \\n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \\n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \\n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \\n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \\n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \\n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \\n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \\n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \\n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \\n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \\n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \\n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \\n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \\n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230754,14 +230754,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013).", + "Sentence": "\n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013).", "newParagraph": "1 united nation convention transnational crime article 2a n 2 united nation convention transnational crime article 2b n 3 united nation convention transnational crime article 2 c n 4 christina steenkamp crimeconflict nexus civil war syria stability vol 6 1 2017 n 5 marina caparini un police challenge organized crime discussion paper sipri april 2019 n 6 ibid n 7 steenkamp crimeconflict nexus n 8 see instance unsc resolution 2482 2019 n 9 philip gounev tihomir bezlov examining link organized crime corruption centre study democracy 2010 n 10 mark shaw tuesday reitano global illicit flow local conflict dynamic case preemptive analysis experimental policy option crimeconflict nexus series 2 united nation university 2017 n 11 caparini un police n 12 heiko nitzschke transforming war economy challenge peacemaking peacebuilding new york international peace academy december 2003 n 13 virginia comolli ed organized crime illicit trade respond strategic challenge old new domain cham switzerland springer international 2018 n 14 united nation office drug crime global report trafficking person 2018 booklet 2 trafficking person context armed conflict new york 2018 n 15 international alert organised crime mali matter peaceful transition conflict policy brief 2016 n 16 matt herbert el salvador gang truce durable model global initiative transnational organized crime july 2013 charles katz e c hedberg luis enrique amaya gang truce violence prevention el salvador bulletin world health organization june 2016 n 17 united nation environmental programme unep rise environmental crime growing threat natural resource peace development security unepinterpol rapid response assessment 2016 unep united nation development programme role natural resource disarmament demobilization reintegration addressing risk seizing opportunity 2013 n 18 programme action illicit trade small arm light weapon legally binding instrument universal political framework measure tackle illicit trade including context organized crime information programme action well related international tracing instrument see httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmssalwprogrammeofaction", "ProcessedSent": "n 17 united nation environmental programme unep rise environmental crime growing threat natural resource peace development security unepinterpol rapid response assessment 2016 unep united nation development programme role natural resource disarmament demobilization reintegration addressing risk seizing opportunity 2013", "SentID": 12819 }, { "ParagraphID": 3485, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \\n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \\n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \\n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \\n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \\n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \\n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \\n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \\n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \\n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \\n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \\n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \\n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \\n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \\n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \\n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", @@ -230772,14 +230772,14 @@ "Heading2": "", "Heading3": "", "Heading4": "", - "Sentence": "\\n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime.", + "Sentence": "\n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime.", "newParagraph": "1 united nation convention transnational crime article 2a n 2 united nation convention transnational crime article 2b n 3 united nation convention transnational crime article 2 c n 4 christina steenkamp crimeconflict nexus civil war syria stability vol 6 1 2017 n 5 marina caparini un police challenge organized crime discussion paper sipri april 2019 n 6 ibid n 7 steenkamp crimeconflict nexus n 8 see instance unsc resolution 2482 2019 n 9 philip gounev tihomir bezlov examining link organized crime corruption centre study democracy 2010 n 10 mark shaw tuesday reitano global illicit flow local conflict dynamic case preemptive analysis experimental policy option crimeconflict nexus series 2 united nation university 2017 n 11 caparini un police n 12 heiko nitzschke transforming war economy challenge peacemaking peacebuilding new york international peace academy december 2003 n 13 virginia comolli ed organized crime illicit trade respond strategic challenge old new domain cham switzerland springer international 2018 n 14 united nation office drug crime global report trafficking person 2018 booklet 2 trafficking person context armed conflict new york 2018 n 15 international alert organised crime mali matter peaceful transition conflict policy brief 2016 n 16 matt herbert el salvador gang truce durable model global initiative transnational organized crime july 2013 charles katz e c hedberg luis enrique amaya gang truce violence prevention el salvador bulletin world health organization june 2016 n 17 united nation environmental programme unep rise environmental crime growing threat natural resource peace development security unepinterpol rapid response assessment 2016 unep united nation development programme role natural resource disarmament demobilization reintegration addressing risk seizing opportunity 2013 n 18 programme action illicit trade small arm light weapon legally binding instrument universal political framework measure tackle illicit trade including context organized crime information programme action well related international tracing instrument see httpswwwunorgdisarmamentconvarmssalwprogrammeofaction", "ProcessedSent": "n 18 programme action illicit trade small arm light weapon legally binding instrument universal political framework measure tackle illicit trade including context organized crime", "SentID": 12820 }, { "ParagraphID": 3485, - "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \\n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \\n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \\n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \\n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \\n 6 Ibid. \\n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \\n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \\n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \\n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \\n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \\n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \\n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \\n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \\n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \\n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \\n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \\n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", + "Paragraph": "1 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(a). \n 2 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2(b). \n 3 United Nations Convention on Transnational Crime, Article 2 (c). \n 4 Christina Steenkamp, \u201cThe Crime-Conflict Nexus and the Civil War in Syria\u201d, Stability, vol. 6, no. 1 (2017). \n 5 Marina Caparini, \u201cUN Police and the Challenges of Organized Crime\u201d, Discussion Paper (SIPRI, April 2019). \n 6 Ibid. \n 7 Steenkamp, \u201cCrime-Conflict Nexus\u201d. \n 8 See, for instance, UNSC resolution 2482 (2019). \n 9 Philip Gounev and Tihomir Bezlov, Examining the Links between Organized Crime and Corruption (Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2010). \n 10 Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, \u201cGlobal Illicit Flows and Local Conflict Dynamics: The Case for Pre-Emptive Analysis and Experimental Policy Options\u201d, Crime-Conflict Nexus Series No. 2 (United Nations University, 2017). \n 11 Caparini, \u201cUN Police\u201d. \n 12 Heiko Nitzschke, \u201cTransforming War Economies: Challenges for Peacemaking and Peacebuilding\u201d (New York, International Peace Academy, December 2003). \n 13 Virginia Comolli, ed., Organized Crime and Illicit Trade: How to Respond to This Strategic Challenge in Old and New Domains (Cham, Switzerland, Springer International, 2018). \n 14 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, \u201cGlobal Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018, Booklet 2: Trafficking in Persons in the Context of Armed Conflict\u201d (New York, 2018). \n 15 International Alert, \u201cOrganised Crime in Mali: Why It Matters for a Peaceful Transition from Conflict\u201d, Policy Brief (2016). \n 16 Matt Herbert, \u201cEl Salvador\u2019s Gang Truce: A Durable Model?\u201d (Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime, July 2013); Charles M. Katz, E. C. Hedberg and Luis Enrique Amaya, \u201cGang Truce for Violence Prevention, El Salvador\u201d, Bulletin of the World Health Organization (June 2016). \n 17 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), \u201cThe Rise of Environmental Crime \u2013 A Growing Threat to Natural Resources, Peace, Development and Security\u201d, a UNEP-INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment (2016); UNEP and United Nations Development Programme, \u201cThe Role of Natural Resources in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration: Addressing Risks and Seizing Opportunities\u201d, (2013). \n 18 While the Programme of Action on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons is not a legally binding instrument, it is the only universal political framework on measures to tackle illicit trade, including in the context of organized crime. For more information about the Programme of Action, as well as the related International Tracing Instrument, see https:\/\/www.un.org\/disarmament\/convarms\/salw\/programme-of-action\/.", "Color": "#CF7AB2", "Level": 6, "LevelName": "IDDRS FRAMEWORK", diff --git a/App/templates/base.html b/App/templates/base.html index e2708e9..44448bc 100644 --- a/App/templates/base.html +++ b/App/templates/base.html @@ -48,9 +48,9 @@ United Nation
- The Integrated Disarmament + The Integrated Disarmament Demobilization and - Reintegration Standards + Reintegration Standards
@@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ + diff --git a/App/templates/home.html b/App/templates/home.html index 9f33bcf..4d3b26a 100644 --- a/App/templates/home.html +++ b/App/templates/home.html @@ -109,12 +109,12 @@
-

Standard: {{standard.stamdardNumber}}

+

IDDRS {{standard.stamdardNumber}}

{{standard.standardTitle}}

{% with 'IDDRSStandards/'|add:standard.standardPath as filePath %} - Open Standard + Open Module {% endwith %}
diff --git a/App/templates/tfidf.html b/App/templates/tfidf.html index f3cbe87..ae36406 100644 --- a/App/templates/tfidf.html +++ b/App/templates/tfidf.html @@ -6,13 +6,14 @@
- +
- +{% if results %}
{% for level in levels %} @@ -25,10 +26,11 @@ {% for standard in standards %} {% if standard.standardLevel == level.levelNumber %}
-
{% endif %} @@ -37,22 +39,36 @@
{% endfor %}
- + - - - +{% endif %}
+ {% if results %}

Results for: {{ phrase }}

{% endif %} + + {% if selectedChoices %} +
Based on the following filter/s:
+ +
+ {% for choice in selectedChoices %} +
{{choice}}
+ {% endfor %} + + +
+ {% endif %} {% for result in results %}
- Level {{ result.level|make_list|first }}, Standard {{result.module}}, Page {{result.pageNumber}} + Level {{ result.level|make_list|first }}, IDDRS {{result.module}}, Page + {{result.pageNumber}}
@@ -66,23 +82,53 @@ {% endfor %}
+ + {% if results %} {% endif %} -
- + + +
+
+

Featured Questions About IDDRS Framework

+
    +
  • +
    Featured Questions About IDDRS Framework
    +
    • +
  • +
    Featured Questions About IDDRS Framework
    +
    • +
  • +
    Featured Questions About IDDRS Framework
    +
    • +
  • +
    Featured Questions About IDDRS Framework
    +
    • +
  • +
    Featured Questions About IDDRS Framework
    +
    • + +
+
+
+
+
+
@@ -94,8 +140,9 @@
-

Level {{result.level}}

-

Standard {{result.module}}

+

Level {{result.level}} {{ + result.levelName }}

+

IDDRS {{result.module}}

{{result.heading1}}

{{result.heading2}}

{{result.heading3}}

@@ -108,7 +155,7 @@
-

{{ result.paragraph|highlight_search:result.sentence|safe }}

+

{{ result.paragraph|highlight_search:result.sentence|safe|linebreaks }}

Page: {{result.pageNumber}}

@@ -120,4 +167,5 @@ {% endfor %} -{% endblock %} \ No newline at end of file +{% endblock %} + diff --git a/App/views.py b/App/views.py index 63a997c..e2b7136 100644 --- a/App/views.py +++ b/App/views.py @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ import os import pandas as pd from .similarity import phrase_preprocessing, similarityCheck from .tfidfSimilarity import cosine_similarity - +import json from django.shortcuts import redirect from django.core.paginator import Paginator @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ from .filters import StandardsFilter import uuid from datetime import date, timedelta + +from django.core import serializers # Create your views here. @@ -85,7 +87,7 @@ def tfidf(request): else: phrase = form.cleaned_data["phrase"] - searchResults = cosine_similarity(20, phrase) + searchResults = cosine_similarity(30, phrase) uid = str(uuid.uuid1())[:8]+phrase for result in searchResults: searchedData = SearchResults( @@ -111,6 +113,7 @@ def tfidf(request): results = SearchResults.objects.filter(uniqueID=uid) + if selectedChoices: results = SearchResults.objects.filter(uniqueID=uid) myFilter = StandardsFilter(request.GET, queryset=results) @@ -120,7 +123,7 @@ def tfidf(request): form = searchForm() # Create pagination for results - paginator = Paginator(results, per_page=5) + paginator = Paginator(results, per_page=10) pageNumber = request.GET.get('page', 1) page_obj = paginator.get_page(pageNumber) diff --git a/mydb.sqlite3 b/mydb.sqlite3 index 0fc8294..d9a6b65 100644 Binary files a/mydb.sqlite3 and b/mydb.sqlite3 differ